HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-02-27 GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
February 21, 2002
,bone; NOTICE OF MEETING
(714)962-2411
fax
(714)952a356 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
" ...ad.ccm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
nolnne address:
failures n Valle'2
4 WEDNESDAY, February 27, 2002 — 7:00 P.M.
9272B-B127
avast aaaress:
1OB44 Ellis Avenue
Fountain valley. CA DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
92706 7016
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Agencies
• The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
cities District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Perk
FountaiUalley 6� '/0y�_
Fullerton
Garden Brave Bo rd Secre
Huntington Beech �.
Irvine
Le Habre
Le Palms
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange
Platanba Tentatively - Scheduled UocominG Meetinos
Sancta Ana
Best Beech
Stanton
Tustin JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
mile Perk SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday, February 25,2002 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD
Yorbe Linda
County of orange SARI PROTECTION/RELOCATION JMC -Tuesday, February 26, 2002 at 12:00 p.m.
@ Yorba Linda Community Center Room B
sanitary oiatricta
Css[e Mese AD HOC COMMITTEE re URBAN RUNOFF -Thursday, February 2B, 2002 at 3:00 p.m.
Midway city
OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, March 6,2002 at 5:00 p.m.
Water oi.vmt.
lrvme Flanch PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, March 7,2002 at 5:00 p.m.
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, March 11, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD
FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, March 13,2002 at 5:00 p.m.
STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 5:00 p.m.
ID maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management.
m
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
March March 27, 2002
April April 24, 2002
May May 22, 2002
June June 26, 2002
July `July 17, 2002
August August 28, 2002
September September25, 2002
October October 23, 2002
November November 20 2002
December 'December 18, 2002
January January 22, 2003
February February 26, 2003
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
\badonWaMil wp.dtaladmin�BSWgendat2002 Meeting NoUwX 1N2.2.doo
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 2/27/02 TINIE: 7.00 p.m.
(MURPHY)........................ ALVAREZ......................
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................��
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD....................
(LARSON) ....................... BOYD............................ Gatr�
(MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................ ✓
(BOARDMAN) .................`e661E, DEBBfE.............. ✓
(CRANDALL).................... COOK, LAURANN.......... ✓ ✓
(SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... 2 . —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ —
(SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... —
(DUVALL)......................... GUL1IXSQN...................� ✓
(DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... ✓ aooq
(WORLEY)........................ IKAWASHIMA............... ✓ ✓ —
(SMITH)............................ KROM........................ c _
(BROADWATER)............. LEYES.......................... —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ _
(CHRISTY) ....................... MCGUIGAN..................
�G �L —
(SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ —
(EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. . —
(FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON.................
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................
�_ ✓ _
(ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY...................
�t �G —
(DOW).............................. SIGLER.........................
_L —
(SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... ✓ a4.tx, _
mini KE ...................... .�
STAFF: ";)u 4 )nd4'�
Anderson ✓ �� `,
Ghirelli
Kyle
Ludwin ✓ 777��� � 0��
Mathews ✓ �
Miles ✓ �j n
Murphy ✓ (/
Ooten
Tomko ✓
Streed ✓
OTHERS:
Woodruff
Andrus
Nixon
01/23/02
G1wp.dta\admin\BS\DIRECT0R0ireclars Roll Call.doo
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
/71 AfF i n Z
Tic
ZAAM I
Cs 0
(lL And Z9
O
i// 0
nv+ V) IYYi S �V Lr-e"-a- r MA Ok-e
�e OuCo
rz
OU
Oarith4hu
H:\WP.DTAUWlWSS\FORMSMlGN.IN FORM.DOO
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: 2 -Z7-0 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) 296; v""O� m //Yip/y�ri v r.✓�/t'
HOME ADDRESS: 8?/ W '-,/ 70� wvod'
(number/street) pp
4 GA'1 Pi✓v1 91280 5
(city/zip code) pp
TELEPHONE: (7iy)
REPRESENTING: 5e'15
(self/name of organization)
G:\wp.dWadmin\BS\FORMS\Request to Spaak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All perknswishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Bard Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: ` L
(number/street) q2,b
(city/zip code) Y
TELEPHONE: ,_ / 6-- '
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of ganization) /
Gdwp.dta\admin0S\F0RMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/II persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: I .. AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) v
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
(city/zip code .
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G9wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution
DATE: Fet2 7 ,. AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: 0 2-0
(number/street)
,T-e a&
(city/z�ip/code)
TELEPHONE: ) D2- -'3d -2 q
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G1w AWd adman\BSFORMS\Request to Speak.doc
/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: Q 7 rQ,b -O 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) aR R �l M n IZ l I )d E 4-
HOME ADDRESS: 1674 AEU S O- A 2 6 4-
(number/street)
AA
V- A-Ct FUDA
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: (( W 33
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G9wp.dtMadmin\BSSPORMSVRequest to Speak.doc
1 / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
V All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: a 6 AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (p se print)
E ADDRESS: VI 7 5 to N tW Pulk< U L� 2l9
(number/street)
� Pyv Pull' �earG� r.4-viz b �3
(city/zip^code)
TELEPHONE: "1 `I "I —, ? 2Z.
REPRESENTING: q) IiP""r/
2�,, 3
(self/name of organizatiory
GSWp.dtatadmW8&F0RM$\Request b Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
\ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: , — _ AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) qq� E o V��' LA Gt
HOME ADDRESS: o'., Q ) �, ( ARY .
(number/street)
A-
(city/zip code)TELEPHONE: ��Yl 6
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G:\wp.&Madmin\BSTORMSRequest to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS:
(nu bed/ treet)
���7�V 4 /2 4
(city/zip/code) (yam
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: - Z �K�(t' U(,- �/Cl'J1,C./�FT •
(self/name of organization)
G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: J�� I- �-Y/� Z AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
(citylzi�p y cod )/(/`'-7 q
TELEPHONE: ` I I
REPRESENTING: n ,.
(self/name of organization)
G:%wp.dta�dmin\BSI ORMSM2equest to Speak.doc
/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: 2— AGENDA ITEM NO.
%//Y
NAME: (please print) e( e 2
HOME ADDRESS: 2070 1� iJ
(num(b�er/(street) G,
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: 2 - Z 7- 0 7 AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) —Trt ^j yn0"��� 5
HOME ADDRESS: 22ZI E-16 �Z_
(number/street)
(city/zip code) .
TELEPHONE:REPRESENTING: 6ce'6ur
(self/name of organization)
G1wp.dtM@dmKBSIF0RM&Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
A('40rvi
DATE: 2 .27'O AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) 'PAy L AR/A -S
HOME ADDRESS: la( 31ffOnwC-
(number/street)
HIc.Hrl"GTcv AcA'H CA 'i;,264 f
(city/zip code) .
TELEPHONE: 71y 9C0 -e!;SY
REPRESENTING: SILF
(self/name of organization)
G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
@AI pergons•wishin'g to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) I Vi .uJ vtn- y—�Z�c
HOME ADDRESS: CIS (a ApA ✓WMLyN4y' Cjy2
(number/street)
(city— /zip diode)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/na a of organization)
G9wp.dt %dminOSSFORMSRequest to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
G 0/ui^,g ?e c , C�1
(city/zip code) � 2 Z�`
TELEPHONE: /� G `
REPRESENTING: - 6 CIO
(self/name of organization)
G9wp.dte\adm1n\BS\F0RMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JAll person s•wishIng to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: o a27 AGENDA ITEM NO. eN t5cv /aJ
NAME: (please print) &bP,,-T 5n 5; d
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: ��tietorS-
(self/name of organization)
G.\.p.d� dmmn BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
./AII persons'wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
VV should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: d0 _ AGENDA ITEM NO. OOZ1✓
NAME: (please print) vl /J Cl C4aJ
HOME ADDRESS: `� l.o Aef t 2 e-
(number/stree
( Q�
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: v
REPRESENTING: S La 54 0-0
(self/name V organization)
6Nj t= Nece55a,V
G:\wp.dt \admin\BSWORMS\Request to SpeakAoc /
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: '27 AGENDA ITEM N / ( d '
NAME: (please print) « « . CAWk
HP ADDRESS: bLD Nfit) W 9J 9l4
(/ (number/street)
N t' "igyt (?i-
(city/zipcode) 2
TELEPHONE: C?I g 1 �
REPRESENTING: U 2 ofiv
(sew a of organization) - I
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons.wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
I
DATE: � �1-- AGENDA ITEM NO. � 2
&tq`
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
+
(city/zipgco )
TELEPHONE: LV (
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G.Nwp,dta\admin\BS\FORMS%Request b Speak.doc
KMWUI=II 1V AUUKrO* IKC r3UAKU Vt UMM,IUKS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the oard Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: ai, � lal AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: L /
(number street)
(city/zip code) _ --
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
G1wp.dWWdmW3ST0RMS1Request to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution,
/ Pm (S
DATE: Z/z- AGENDAITEMNO.
NAME: (please print) I�' u
HOME ADDRESS: 704. 9666,1A
(number/street)
<fOAD/,+ P,;6 hA2 5262,S1
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: ODU
(self/name of organization)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: L)4y" nC 'ZL tJ
(number/street)
�- Ql 4
(city/zip// e)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name organization)
KCUUCA1 IU AUUKt„ 1Kt tfUAKU OF UIKt[iIVKU
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should corriplete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to t`le Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.
DATE: 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) �ft��- ARrt
HOME ADDRESS: _
(number/street)
/av N r'N:; Tc SAct{ c%
(city/zip code) .
TELEPHONE: fd o- 8 S5 {� ,
REPRESENTING: L.'P
(self/name of organization)
GAwp.dLMadminWStFORMSXRequest to Speak.aoc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board
meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED)
must be given to the BoardSecretary prior to the meeting for distribution..
DATE: yFa'OZ AGENDA ITEM NO. /U e
NAME: (please print)
HOME ADDRESS: T�s si!ree
(numb //stt)
.�r e/r �
(city/zip
TELEPHONE: ! G 9f —
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
#2
CHAIR'S REPORT TO THE BOARD
FEBRUARY 27, 2002
BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENTS AT THE GWRS JOINT
l COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM NO. 18.D. REGARDING THE
APPROVAL OF THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT AND TO CONSIDER IT AT A LATER DATE.
I RECOMMEND WE DO SO TO FURTHER REFINE THE
AGREEMENT.
1 AM PLEASED TO REPORT THAT JEFF BROWN, A
SENIOR ENGINEER IN THE AIR QUALITY DIVISION HAS
BEEN APPOINTED TO THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT. THIS IS THE THIRD
LARGEST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT IN
CALIFORNIA WITH OVER 68,000 STUDENTS IN
FULLERTON COLLEGE, CYPRESS COLLEGE AND THE
SCHOOL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION. JEFF HAS
INDICATED THAT HE WILL RUN FOR A FULL FOUR-
1
YEAR TERM WHEN HIS APPOINTMENT EXPIRES IN
NOVEMBER.
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE QUALITY OF EMPLOYEES
WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE HERE.
(3i THE SCHEDULE FOR THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN
MARCH IS:
OMTS COMMITTEE MEETING: WEDNESDAY, MARCH
6TH
PDC COMMITTEE MEETING: THURSDAY, MARCH
7TH
FAHR COMMITTEE MEETING: WEDNESDAY, MARCH
13TH
AND THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON URBAN RUNOFF
WILL MEET TOMORROW AFTERNOON, THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 28TH, AT 3 P.M. IF A MEETING IS REQUIRED
IN MARCH, IT WILL BE HELD ON THE 28TH BEGINNING
AT 3 P.M.
4— RESOLUflO--V FOR PETER-GREEN=ifhe sh6ws
2
vigERT� McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. ��
RANa-
February 5,2002
Mr. Norman Eckenrode SENT CERTIFIED MAIL—
Chairman of the Board #7000-0520-0021-9639-4381
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
SUBJECT: Biosolids Management Options
Dear Mr. Eckenrode,
As you are probably aware,the biosolids reuse industry has taken several `hits on the chin' in the
past few years. County upon county have enacted ordinances regulating biosolids reuse that have
drastically reduced the viable options for municipalities like the Orange County Sanitation
District(OCSD). The question becomes simply, `Where will all this material goT With that in
mind, we want you to know that there are still cost effective options available to OCSD and the
other generators in Southern California that do not require any capital investments(long term or
otherwise)on the part of the generators and that provide technology that is proven. Here is what
is available to Orange County right now.
McCarthy Family Farms, htc. (MFF) and our wholly owned subsidiary, San Joaquin Composting,
Inc. (SJC) handle more biosolids in California than any other contractor. Our facilities, located
in Kings County and Kern County respectively, have been relatively unaffected by the movement
banning biosolids reuse that has plagued the state. We are aware however, that these prohibitions
have drastically affected the operations of other biosolids management companies including
those that service OCSD. But please be aware,they are not the only game in town.
McCarthy Family Farms land application site is located in one of the most remote regions of the
Central Valley,with the nearest residential neighbor some 15 miles away. The site is permitted
through the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and Kings County for a total
acreage exceeding some 19,000 acres. Being a family run operation,we do what is best for our
soil. This farm, which has been an active farm for over 90 years, has incorporated the reuse of
biosolids as one of the elements in a total program. This combined with sensible crop rotations
and agronomic application rates, create one of the best run programs in the country. Yes, we are
concerned about the Kings County Ordinance which bans the use of Class B biosolids at the end
of 2002,but we are working diligently with their staff to secure an extension which is provided
within the framework of the Ordinance. We feel confident that our request will be granted.
San Joaquin Composting works in conjunction with MFF. While SJC is a stand-alone company,
1601 Skyway Drive,Suite 205 • P.O. Box 80727
Bakersfield,CA 93380-0727
(661)391-5840 (661)391-5844(Fax)
www mrrarthvflarmc rnm
i
Mr. Norman Eckenrode
February 5, 2002
Page 2
many of our clients enter into contracts that allow for their material to be shipped to either
facility. SJC,which is the largest permitted biosolids composting facility in the Western U.S.,
has a capacity of 786,000 tons annually and has been in operation for over I I years. Current
contractual obligations place SJC at just over half capacity, leaving plenty of room for the many
treatment plant operators such as Orange County. Like the farm location, SJC is virtually in the
middle of no when:. With the nearest residence or business being over 9 miles away, SJC takes
pride is stating that we have never had an odor complaint and has had proven success in selling
our finished product. No other compost facility in the state can make such statements.
The operations of our two companies are unique to the biosolids industry. With both land
application and composting,we present to our clients a 365 day per year service,guaranteed.
When more biosolids are needed at the farm,or more land is available, loads are diverted for land
application. Concurrently,when more material is needed at the compost site or during times of
rain fall at the fans, material is shipped to be composted. No other company in the state can
offer such dependable services during such times of uncertainty.
However, this level of service and commitment seems to run contrary to OCSD staffs desires.
In a report that was commissioned by OCSD staff from Carollo Engineers in July 2001, it is
stated that MFF/SJC are"not compatible with District philosophy"(excerpts from this report are
enclosed). Frankly Mr. Eckenrode, we are at a loss to understand how sites that operate with
such impeccable records and offer available capacity at a reasonable price could not be
compatible with the District. The emergency backup option recommended by Carollo (a land-fill
in Arizona at$56 per ton)hardly seems to fall within the `focally responsible solutions'noted in
the OCSD Mission Statement. Surely, other options exist.
We hope that you will agree that what we have brought forth makes sense(and certainly,some
does not). There are other options available to OCSD at a cost that is certainly within reason,
and that would not place a financial burden on the District or your rate payers. We hope your
board will consider these alternatives. 1 would be glad to discuss what options we can provide to
Orange County Sanitation District and can be easily reached in our Bakersfield office @
661.391.5940 or you can visit us on the web @ mccarthvfarms.com for additional information. I
look forward to hearing from you soon.
Reg" ds,/
4
. Patrick McCarthy
McCarthy Family Fartns, Inc.
cc: OCSD Board of Directors
Enc.
9
I '
Table 5 Screenings Analysis Results
Blosollds Alternatives EvalOation
Orange County Sanitation District
Alternatives FurtherCpnsideration ::Reason
I Composting
Westlake Farms No Not Operational,Permits not
obtained
_ Synagro Yea
Icon Yes
McCarthy Farms/SX Va. Not compatible with District
philosophy
Vermlouaure ;No. No US Installations
F Chemical Fixation
California Soil Products Yes
r Tule Rench - Yes
N-Vlro ;NO High pH product, odorous process
RDP En-Vessel :Yes
r
Hondo : No Too costly, questionable product
sales
Ir Transitional Environmental No Unproven technology
Waste Conversion : No Unproven technology
t, Industries
Heat Treatment
Zimpto No Excessive odors
Problems at existing facilities
Ver-Tech No Mlle deep tubes not feasible
Pasteurization
f Cambl No Unproven technology
t" EMWD Process No Unproven technology
Incineration No SCAQMD permitting unlikely
LOther Alternatives
STORS/ARP No Unproven technology
`- Enertech No " Unproven technology
L Mlnergy No Jnproven technology ;
aI
JUIy?20 snarrax<enaunv�m"°v
,9
Table 6 Screenings Analysis Results
Blosollds Alternatives Evaluation
Orange County Sanitation District
Aftemattms Further Consideration - ,Reason
Zeombc No Unproven tectmblogy
' Air Drying 'No High odorklaadIntensive
Cement Igln Injection Jdo UmIted.CapACily-
Class B Alternatives
Landfill ING No Class A'tilosopds
r. Out of State Rail Haul Yes
Land Purchase No No Cleas=
High capital sbets
r
Deep Well Injection :No No Cleve A blosoilds
Mlle deep wells not feasible
r' Digestion
Anaerobic No No Class A blosolids
r Two Phase No No Class A blosollds—pursue if
cost effective on its jown
r Thermophtiic Anaerobic No No Class A blosords
ATAD No Odors,foaming, not compatible
l Temperature Phased No No Class A blosolids
Anaerobic
Heat Drying
VA Tech : No Direct heat drier. Large air volume
required for bad fluidization and
r drying
F Swiss Comb] ' Yes
4 US Filter Dragon Dryer No Problems%Mt i existing facillies
Seghers Better Technology Yes
USA
Carver Greenfield No Problems with existing facilities
r
Jury 2001
+.+ce.nrov,d.s.�oxres�uoo+NKmm.aoc
l
�. The treatment facilities are located In an industrial area of Los Angeles that is approved for fertiBze,
production. The facility will be totally enclosed and the air removed from the process area will be
scrubbed. The use of venture capital makes this the least costly option on a present worth basis,
which eliminates the need for District investment.
10.Y2 Tule Ranch
Addition of enough alkaline chemicals to the Districts biosolids at the Tule Ranch silo offers the
capability to produce Class A biosolids on the site owned or controlled by the District.Working with
4- the Site Manager,a relatively inexpensive source of alkaline byproduct has been ascertained. Use
of this she has the advantage of being remote and already permitted for lend application.Since the
site is already owned and a source of chemical has been determined, chemical addition could be
rapidly implemented at this site with very little capital Investment. Based on these factors the use of
chemical addition on this site should be pursued further.
10.3 Out-of-State Rail Haul
The out of state rall haul alemative was considered even though this alternative does not produce
Class A blosolkis. Land application of Class B biosolids in Arizona may be feasible as a long tern
solution.The project would require the long-term contract of a sizeable portion (-300 wet tons per
day)of the Districts blosolids. The project would then use the secured contracts from the District
and LACSD to obtain venture capital to finance the purchase of 65,000 acres in Arizona.This land
■ would then be used for the land application of the blosolids. The project may provide the District
4 with an alternative or a back-up to process in 11eu of complying with Class A criteria of the short
term blosolids management plan.Additionally,the export of"sludge'across stale lines could
1 become a political concern. It is uncertain in light of recent events,whether US EPA will add further
r restrictions of ban the land application of Class B solids in the future.This alternative is also
f relatively expensive on a present worth basis.
r 10.4 Heat Dryers
Dryer technology provides the advantages of reduced truck traffic from the site, ability to provide a
product for reuse In Orange County and ability to easily control the amount of Class A biosolids
generated at the site. However, it is very doubtful that given the Distdcts construction and
purchasing constraints these faclll8es could not be completed by January 2003.These aftomativer
will be further considered in a long-term plan.
4 10.6 Emergency/Backup Option
During the next 18 months the District is very vulnerable to forces beyond Its control.With all
produced blosolids going to land application in areas where there are ongoing regulatory changes
or concerns, it is prudent to provide a backup or emergency option.Waste Markets has landfill
space available in Arizona and can provide transportation of the biosolids as an emergency
biosoBtls management option. The option allows up to 400 wet tons of biosolids per day to be
L
4 July 2001
r disposed of for a fee of$56.50 per wet ton, In order to guarantee thli.. 1h91}landfill,an
access fee of$600 per month Is required. this"Insurance policy is.
�¢": at We time.
��drtdetl
3
x
`• . o t' e f a ti }'. ti�i .l�i a 1
K T".C,
j .
AM
`it �yl rY
e� 3ry .l fF`
r. eta:;•
r ..
July 2001
• ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
February 19. 2002 Board Secretary
phone:
1714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members
ram° of the Board of Directors
(714)962M56
.n"a.wm Subject: Board Letter
m.iiinp soot..,:
P.4 Boa 8127
r rcain Valley.C4
9272e-8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
..aatams: information on any of the items, please call me.
10644 alit Awrus
Pounti in Valley.CA
92705-7019 Now is the Time for Respectful and Orderly and Complete Discernment
Member Several city councils have recently taken positions on the treatment level issue, well
Avent a in advance of being able to consider the results of the ocean science studies and
other research work surrounding this important public policy decision. City council
Cities study sessions are scheduled and draft resolutions are under preparation in other
anaherh cities that would urge the Sanitation District to construct full secondary treatment
area facilities at an estimated cost of$400,000,600.
Buena Park
GyPress
Fountsin th rley I would like to make the case that all elected public bodies in Orange County should
�it
h tee withhold judgment until after the Sanitation District's Board of Directors and the
0,nattng4m Beach general public have had time to review the considerable amount of information that is
labra underpreparation. I believe that for anyone to make an informed judgment on this
La Habra y l 9
1-a Palma important public policy decision it is imperative that they consider all of the salient
Los aanliroe information that is now available and that will soon become available. That's just
Ah wdort Beach
=i orange good government.
Placenta
slow Said Batch The independent scientific review panel that is now reviewing our ocean studies
Seal Beach P P 9
stern believes its work will be completed in April. For this reason, it would be timely and
r'T'n appropriate for interested public bodies to conduct workshops to hear the results of
Vllle Park
roan Linda our studies after that Simply put, now is the time to allow the 25 members of the
c,unty a or,nv, Sanitation District Board of Directors to conduct an orderly process of discernment.
We are developing information in five area:
Series" Districts
costs Mesa Ocean Science
Midway oty
water District. The Sanitation District completed a $5.1 million monitoring program during the
summer of 2001. Designed by 30-person independent committee of ocean experts
lrnna Panch and local interested parties, this is the single most extensive (and expensive)ocean
monitoring program ever conducted in the United States over such a short period of
time to answer a specific question,which is,"Is the discharge plume of the Sanitation
District reaching shore and influencing the bacterial contamination of Huntington
Beach?" Waiting for the answer to this question is reason enough to delay taking an
early position on this matter.
To maintain world class leadership in wastewater and water resource management.
Members of the Board
Page 2
February 19, 2002
You might ask this question: "Is there any preliminary data that has emerged that
points to the Sanitation District's ocean discharge as the culprit? If so, then isn't it
better to not delay a decision and to instead just get on with it?" Well, my response is
simply this. The data so far do not point to the Sanitation District as the source of
beach bacterial pollution. On the contrary. It seems that the bacteria are coming from
land-based sources—not from contaminated ocean water. For this reason there's no
downside to waiting. There's no reason to believe that there's urgency in the matter.
Treatment Technology Options
There are studies now underway to determine whether microfiltration is an effective
technology for upgrading the Sanitation District's treatment. Preliminary results,
obtained from previous studies here and next door at the Water District, are that
microfiltration is very effective in removing pathogens and suspended solids. It has
the distinct advantage over conventional secondary treatment methodology(which is
being advocated by the Ocean Outfall Group)of using far less energy and producing
far less sludge. The studies now underway will help to confirm projected operational
performance and costs. Another reason to wait: what's the best technology to use in
the future?
Financial Impacts and User Fees
We are developing better budgeting numbers for various treatment alternatives. This
includes both operating and capital costs. Once we have good estimates in hand we
can then calculate the expected increases in user fees for the homes, factories
businesses, schools, and the other customers that represent the 2.2 million people
we serve. Another reason to wait: what is the user fee impact on the citizens and
businesses in our service area? We have a fiduciary duty to provide a clear answer.
Regulatory and Permitting Issues
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board have jointly issued our existing ocean discharge permit.
1 can say with complete confidence that they issued the permit with unequivocal
certainty that we have met all of the relevant requirements of the federal Clean Water
Act and the California Ocean Plan. If they couldn't have concluded that, then they
would have been prohibited under law from issuing us the 301(h)waiver permit in the
first place. Actually, they've issued us such a permit twice: in 1985 and in 1998.
We will have to demonstrate to them all over again that we are sufficiently protective
of public health and the environment no matter what kind of a permit we apply for. It
Members of the Board
Page 3
February 19, 2002
will take them six months or more to complete their own scientific analyses and policy
deliberations, once they receive our permit application during the latter half of 2002.
Their deliberations have included and will include extensive public commentary.
Public Input and Public Participation
The Sanitation District Board of Directors will be hearing what the public wants
through several legitimate and well thought-out means. We have conducted 2 public
workshops and will conduct several more. We have formed a 30-member public
advisory committee that has met and will meet a number of times. We have
conducted one public opinion poll. We will conduct at least one more. Extensive
written public input that is required under the California Environmental Quality Act
(better known as "CEQA")will be received and reported in full accordance with state
law.
It is our desire to provide a comprehensive and balanced report of the opinions of the
community at large. It is our hope that the point of view of one segment of the
population does not dominate over the points of view of the many. This is another
reason to wait: to give everyone time to be listened to respectfully.
Today, I'm not asking for anyone's judgment one way or the other. All I'm asking for
is time so that this Board of Directors can complete an open and transparent process
of discernment that is respectful and orderly and complete.
The Infamous Effluent Turbidity Meter Caper
You may have seen the January 27 article (copy attached) in the Los Angeles Times
that implied that there is reason to be concerned that the District's effluent turbidity
has caused adverse environmental consequences on the marine environment. The
January 27 article was followed by an editorial on February 3, along with five letters to
the Editor on the issue,which are also attached. On February 5 I prepared an e-mail
response that was widely distributed. I have also attached a copy of my response in
case you did not receive it.
Please give me a call at 714 593-7110 if you have any questions. I'd be happy to
answer them for you.
EPA Tentatively Approves San Diego Ocean Waiver
The US EPA recently gave its tentative approval to San Diego for another five-year
Clean Water Act Section 301(h)waiver. San Diego provides primary treatment to its
ocean discharge. See the attached article.
Members of the Board
Page 4
February 19, 2002
Assemblyman Maddox Proposes Ocean Discharge Bill
Assembly Bill 1969, authored by Assemblyman Ken Maddox of Garden Grove and
introduced on February 14, is an effort to amend Section 13269 of the Water Code.
"The bill would provide that the water code be amended to included requirements
resulting to densities of total coliform,fecal coliforrn and enterococcus bacteria that
exceed certain sanitation standards or standards set forth in the California Ocean
Plan." See a copy of the bill attached.
Staff is currently analyzing the bill.
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Prepares to Adopt Waste
Discharge Requirements for the District and Member Cities
The Regional Board has held two workshops and numerous informal meetings with
the District and its member cities in preparing its tentative order(permit)for local and
regional sanitary sewer collection systems. This is the first order in the state that will
employ the federal Capacity, Management, Operation and Maintenance (CMOM)
program. This is referred to as the Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) in the
order. Since EPA has not yet issued its sanitary sewer overflow(SSO)-CMOM
regulations, the Regional Board has decided to issue this first permit as Stale Waste
Discharge Requirements (W DRs)and not as a Clean Water Act National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. EPA, Region IX initially opposed this
approach, but they have since indicated that they won't insist on an NPDES permit.
Technical Services, Engineering, Operations, and the District's General Counsel
reviewed the Tentative W DR. The Regional Board staff made numerous changes to
the draft order based on the comments generated by the District's staff and others.
Overall, the District's staff has focused on developing a workable permit that
recognizes the strengths of our existing programs here in Orange County. Our
concerns have included the strict discharge prohibition and unreasonable capacity
requirements. We were also concerned about the role of the District in relation to our
member cities. As now drafted, the District will lead a steering committee of self-
selected (voluntary)cities to address the development of the SSMP including a
grease control program. The tentative order is scheduled for adoption in March.
District-Wide Classification and'Compensation Study
Douglas Johnson presented recommendations for the compensation phase of the
classification study to the FAHR committee in closed session on February 13. Mr.
Johnson reviewed the objectives of the District's compensation plan, labor market
definition, labor market position, survey class selection, market data collection
Members of the Board
Page 5
February 19, 2002
process, market pricing versus internal equity, internal salary relationships and salary
recommendations. A proposed range matrix allocating every classification to a pay
range was reviewed. Steve Filarsky, District Labor Counsel, and Human Resources
staff were available for questions and answers. The FAHR committee approved the
compensation phase recommendations and directed Steve Filarsky and staff to begin
to meet with our employees.
On January 30, meetings were held with the bargaining units (501, SPMT and OCEA)
as well as the unrepresented employees to discuss the classification phase of the
study. Douglas Johnson presented information on the classification phase and the
meeting was opened to questions from the business agents and employees. Human
Resources staff was present at both meetings and Steve Filarsky attended the
bargaining unit meeting.
Discussions with the bargaining units on the compensation phase will begin in the
last two weeks of February.
Seminar on Bacterial Source Trackina
On February 5, a conference, sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, the National Water
Research Institute and the California State Water Resources Board, was held on the
subject of Bacterial Source Tracking. Approximately 250 water quality professionals
attended, including several members of the technical staff from the District's
Environmental Sciences Laboratory and the Environmental Compliance and
Monitoring divisions. The objective of Bacterial Source Tracking (BST) is to develop
methods to determine the source(s)of bacterial contamination in environmental
samples (e.g. from human, livestock, or wildlife origins). Linking the major
contributing sources of indicator bacteria with land use will aid decision-makers in
making the best decisions for changing public policies and practices.
Fifteen researchers presented the results of BST methods used in their laboratories.
Following the public presentations, a team of reviewers met for the next 1 1/2 days to
discuss the results, assess where to go from here and prepare a summary report and
conclusions.
In summary, it appears that BST may be possible using some combination of
technologies such as specialized types of gene analysis, antibiotic resistance
patterns, biochemical profiles and immunological methods, all of which are already in
common use in clinical settings. With proven methods of BST in hand, it may
become possible to determine the origin of bacteria that are creating problems in
places like Huntington Beach and Newport Bay.
Members of the Board
Page 6
February 19, 2002
Proposed Pre-Annexation Agreement for El Morro Elementary School (Laguna
Beach Unified School District)
On February 11, 2002, the District received a letter from Laguna Beach Unified
School District(LBUSD) requesting the preparation and processing of a Pre-
Annexation I Service Agreement between OCSD and LBUSD for future annexation of
El Morro Elementary School and the ability for the school to receive sewer service
from OCSD via Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD).
EI Morro Elementary School occupies about 10 acres of territory along Pacific Coast
Highway outside of the current sphere of influence of OCSD, IRWD, and the City of
Laguna Beach. Recently the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board has
issued a cease and desist order to both the El Morro School and the El Morro portion
of the Crystal Cove State Park from continuing on septic tank sewer service. Both
entities have attended meetings with OCSD and IRWD and wish to pursue some kind
of sewer service agreement and connection to the OCSD sewerage system.
State Parks has not yet come forward with specific detailed information to determine
precise acreage or connection fees. LBUSD has submitted details in writing and are
willing to proceed with an annexation, including payment of all fees, should the Board
of Directors approve such an agreement and subsequent annexation. El Morro
School currently has about 700 students, faculty and other employees and produces
about 10,000 gallons per day(0.01 MGD)of sewage when the school is in session.
This sewage flow will have a negligible impact on the existing OCSD sewerage
system. Our South Coast Trunk Sewer comes within a quarter mile of El Morro
School at this time.
The proposal from LBUSD for annexation and future connection to the OCSD
sewerage system is supported by IRWD and the Orange County Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO). IRWD has informally agreed to be the local
sewering agency and will maintain a new pump station and force main next to the
school to convey sewage to OCSD. This proposed annexation would facilitate the
correction of environmental deficiencies in a failing septic tank system.
The District's Steering Committee will consider this issue at a future meeting.
Odor Complaints
I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control
Center.
Members of the Board
Page 7
February 19, 2002
Published Articles of Interest
I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I
would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so
many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
A&-,
Blake P. Anderson
General Manager
BPA:jt
G%WROTA4DI "WL51EHS TO THE ROAN M22702B OLETTER OOC
Attachments
Memorandum(email) from Blake Anderson to Everyone, Board of Directors (with copies... Page 1 of 4
Tappan, Jean
From: Anderson, Blake
Sent: Tuesday, February 05,2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Orange County Sanitation District response to recent Times article and editorials
Response by Blake Anderson, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District, regarding
the recent LA Times articles and editorial comments regarding the Sanitation District's effluent
turbidity meter
Like many of you, I opened the January 27, Sunday Metro Section of the Times and was
surprised to find an article about the Sanitation District. The following Sunday the Times
published an editorial and five letters to the editor. Its time you heard from me.
Most of the substance of the article was news to me at the time I first read it. . Since
then, I have talked to the people directly involved in the facts of the matter and I am left
with the clear impression that it was not a balanced report and, in fact, substantive and
salient information that was in the possession of the reporter and that would have left the
reader with an entirely different impression were not included in the article. I do not know
why the information was not included. However, it is my opinion that one reason for the
bitter harvest of editorial comment that followed the report a week later is partly
attributable to the overall content of the report of the Times. A look at the layout
and content of the editorial comments that following Sunday is direct evidence of the
point-of-view that the Times has taken on this matter. The Times can and should take
positions on important public policy issues—that's an important role of a free press. But
the reader should also understand that the Times looks through that lens every time it
encounters us.
The article reported that we improperly removed a monitoring device used to test the
turbidity of our effluent. We don't believe this is true and we have reason to believe so.
The article implied that there is reason to be concerned that the District's effluent turbidity
has caused adverse environmental consequences on the marine environment. This is
untrue and is simply unsubstantiated by the facts.
The article is correct in stating that a turbidity meter was installed in 1996. Our
Operations and Maintenance Department installed the meter as a diagnostic tool to
understand better the reason for variations in our effluent settleable solids concentration.
They were trying to understand the factors that might have contributed to an occasion
of elevated settleable solids in the effluent (May 1994) and the one-time instantaneous
exceedance of our effluent standard for settleable solids that occurred in February 1996.
The O&M Department ordered the installation of a continuously reading (and recording)
turbidity meter as a surrogate to settleable solids because it was the only available
technology that could potentially provide a continuous reading that would serve as a
reasonably useful diagnostic tool. It would also provide additional turbidity data during
the period it was connected —assuming that it was properly maintained and monitored.
This was a proactive and creative attempt to better understand our treatment systems
and improve compliance consistency.
02/14/2002
Memorandum(email)from Blake Anderson to Everyone,Board of Directors (with copies... Page 2 of 4
Unfortunately, the meters installation was delayed and it did not prove to be a useful
tool for O&M's diagnostic purposes. For this reason, further and active attention to the
meter was forgotten. All the while, the District continued to measure, analyze, and report
the results of turbidity samples analyzed in the laboratory as dictated in our ocean
discharge permit. We were always in full compliance with the turbidity requirement of
our ocean discharge permit. What is important to note here (and which the article fails to
mention) is that the U.S. EPA and the Regional Water Quality Board require that
turbidity be measured using specifically prescribed laboratory methods, not by a meter,
for determining compliance with turbidity limits specified in the District's ocean discharge
permit. That's exactly what we have done and continue to do.
Had the turbidity meter remained in service and worked reasonably well, it could have
also been an additional check on the quality of our effluent—but as another set of data
points, not a substitute for what is required by the terms of our permit.
The turbidity meter turned out not to be placed into full use as a diagnostic or reporting
tool for settleable solids. The story should have ended there. However, the intent of the
diagnostic study was better thought out than the implementation of the study.
Regrettably, by the time the meter was installed (2 years after the original high settleable
solids research was done and the recommendation to install it had occurred), the
original purpose of the meter was lost— basically, responsible operations staff was
unclear about the intent, purpose and maintenance parameters for the device. For this
reason, proper maintenance was never established for the meter. Once it was there, it
was hooked up to the plant's computerized system with the rest of the final effluent
sampling system 'just in case" someone wanted to look at the data. So it remained
plugged into our computer system cranking out inaccurate data for over five years while
no one took any discerning note or interest in its operational condition or efficacy of its
data. This condition was inadvertently discovered by our chief operator in October when
he opened up a computer screen and randomly picked the meter's data stream to
demonstrate to a visiting Regional Water Quality Control Board compliance inspector
how easily our computerized system provides data on all assets in our facilities. The
data stream looked strange because the meter had been effectively abandoned and
unmaintained. But it continued to send a mindless computer signal to the plant's central
computerized data bank.
At this point in the story you have reason to wonder why staff failed to adequately follow
through with the original intent and failed to cause the meter to be maintained
competently. I'm asking this myself. I conclude that it was simply the consequence of
poor communication and a lack of attention to detail by the staff originally requesting the
installation of the meter. But the implications made by the Times and others that the
motivation was to avoid unfavorable data is just not true. If that was, indeed,the
motivation, then why would the meter have remained connected to the effluent stream
and to our central computer? If that had been our intention, then the meter would have
quietly removed years ago.
02/14/2002
Memorandum(email) from Blake Anderson to Everyone,Board of Directors (with copies... Page 3 of 4
A quick note here on how a turbidity meter works. A light beam of known intensity travels
a known distance through a narrow stream of water and to a light meter that reads the
resultant intensity of the light beam. The difference in the beginning and ending intensity
is calibrated to provide the turbidity of the water. More turbidity blocks more light and the
resultant intensity is less. Very clear water blocks very little light and the resultant
intensity is greater. That's how the meter works in theory. The biggest problem with a
continuous reading turbidity meter is that the glass surfaces that protect the light and
protect the meter must be absolutely clean. Any accumulation of material on the glass
surfaces blocks light and causes the readings to be inaccurate. In this case, the meter
was not being adequately maintained for years. The more material that accumulated on
the glass, the more light was blocked and the higher the apparent turbidity. (This is akin
to never washing a window for 5 years and forming the impression that the outside world
is constantly gray). This is the reason for the high level shown in the chart accompanying
the article. The reporter was told this but this important information was not reported in
the article.
The article infers that turbid effluent from the District could be having an adverse effect
on ocean water quality and marine life. This is untrue and we told the reporter so. In
fact, we consistently meet the ambient ocean water limitations specified in the permit
issued by EPA and the RWQCB. In fact, our effluent turbidity compliance record has
been so uniformly consistent, the Regional Water Quality Control Board reduced the
sampling frequency for turbidity in 1998 when our ocean discharge permit was re-issued
to us. In fact, there have been no turbidity exceedances as far back as anyone can
remember.
As a practical matter, think also about this. It's one thing to discharge turbid water in a
lake or stream at a 10 feet depth where sunlight could be blocked. Its an entirely different
matter in the darkness that exists at the 200-foot depth of our ocean outfall pipe. No
sunlight ever reaches the area in which we discharge. Its pitch black down there. So the
concern expressed in the article about reduced light penetration is simply irrelevant in our
case. The reporter knew this, but failed to mention it.
Water clarity around our outfall in the uppermost portion of the water column where sun
light naturally penetrates is good. Our ocean monitoring program routinely measures
transparency in the ocean water. Our marine scientists consistently observe good
productivity in the shallow waters of Huntington Beach in the depths known as the photic
zone. There simply are no observable consequences associated with effluent turbidity
in the marine waters off our coastline. In fact we routinely find quite the opposite. Our
ocean monitoring program consistently finds higher diversity of marine life (an Important
measure of the health of the ecosystem) around the outfall with our most recent quarterly
sampling showing some of the highest diversity that we've ever seen. We have, on
numerous occasions, conveyed this kind of information to the reporter.
02/14/2002
Memorandum (email) from Blake Anderson to Everyone,Board of Directors (with copies... Page 4 of 4
The bottom line here is that the District's treatment processes are constantly monitored
for a large number of parameters. If there were to be a problem with the treatment
system our highly-skilled operators (who, incidentally, are licensed by the State of
California after completing rigorous written tests and experience requirements) will see it
first in one of several areas. For example, settleable solids, one measure of process
reliability, is sampled every day, 7 days a week, at high flow (the most conservative time
to measure—the "worst-case" conditions possible during the day). Total suspended
solids, another process control measure, is also measured daily as a 24-hour composite
sample. The District uses multiple tools to ensure that the sewage processed at our
facilities is treated adequately and meets the terms and conditions of our ocean
discharge permit.
I want to assure everyone that OCSD takes seriously its obligation to meet all of the
terms and conditions in our permit, in the accuracy of its reporting to the regulatory
agencies and the public, and, above all, in protecting the health of the public and the
environment. We welcome the oversight of the Regional Water Quality Board, EPA, and
the health care agency, to ensure we are meeting our requirements. All of our records
are open to public scrutiny. Many of our records are available through our web site.
In the end, simply taking our word for it may not be enough for you. If that is the case,
then I urge you to talk directly to EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Call Janet Hashimoto or Terry Fleming at EPA at (415) 744-1905 and call Julio Lara at
the RWQCB at(909) 782-4901 and find out what they think about this issue.
Blake P.Anderson
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Ave.
Fountain Valley,CA
Office 714.593.7110 Fax 714.962.0356 Cell 714.801.3931
fmailto:BANDERSON@CCSD.COMI
The Essence of Unity is Respect for Diversity
02/14/2002
Los Angeles Times: Sewage Issue Murky With Gauge Gone Pagel of 3
Coo Angeles Mutes
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-000006837ia )7 story
THE REGION
Sewage Issue Murky With Gauge Gone
Environment: Accuracy of monitor that showed acceptable
outflow from Huntington Beach treatment plant was questioned.
New device may be required.
By CHRISTINE HANLEY and SEEMA MEHTA
TIMES STAFF WRITERS
January 27 2002
The Orange County Sanitation District removed a pollution monitoring device after a state inspector said
it was generating questionable readings,making him suspect that sewage flowing into the ocean
exceeded legal limits for water clarity, documents and interviews show.
The device, installed voluntarily in 1996,was pulled out of a Huntington Beach treatment plant in
October, shortly after a meeting with the water-quality inspector,who raised questions about
miscalibrations and apparent false readings,his reports show.
The device, a turbidity analyzer, is not required. But it has become a popular round-the-clock monitoring
tool at public and private sewer plants across the nation because it can signal trouble in the treatment
process. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the area's primary enforcer of federal
and state discharge permits, is exploring whether to require the Orange County agency to reinstall such a
monitor.
Sanitation officials oppose this, arguing that the daily laboratory samples they take under current
regulations are enough to ensure that the partially treated sewage meets clean-water standards. Because
those samples show no violations,they said, another level of monitoring is unnecessary. In any case,
they said the system never worked properly and was never relied upon for official readings.
"It was something that was in place,like a clock on the wall.You look at it when you want to know the
time,and when you don't,you don't look at it," said Lisa Murphy, spokeswoman for the agency,which
serves more than 2 million households and businesses in north and central Orange County.
"It's something we put in place originally thinking we could use it.... And it was not being used,"
Murphy said. "So there's really no magical explanation as to why it stayed there unused."
Questions about the monitor emerge as the sanitation district seeks to extend a federal permit allowing it
to discharge 243 million gallons a day of partially treated waste water 4 1/2 miles off Huntington Beach.
http://www.latimes.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=la"/o2D000006837jan27 02/15/2002
Los Angeles Times: Sewage Issue Murky With Gauge Gone Page 2 of 3
The district is the largest of 36 public agencies in the country--and one of four remaining in California--
with a waiver to the 1972 Clean Water Act,which mandates that sewage released into waterways
receive rigorous treatment to kill most bacteria,viruses and other disease-causing organisms.
The monitor was intended to measure turbidity--cloudiness in the water--which is one of more than 120
variables the sanitation district must track under restrictions established by California's Ocean Plan and
federal law.
Turbidity violations could cost up to $11,000 a day,depending on the severity and duration.They also
could jeopardize renewal of the waiver. To date,the district has not been cited.
Turbid water blocks out light, decreasing vegetation,which provides food and shelter to marine life.
"As it reduces light,it decreases photosynthesis," said Clint Winant, a professor of oceanography at the
Scripps Institute of Oceanography. "Generally, you would decrease the productivity of waters."
While turbidity itself doesn't affect human health, experts said its presence can indicate more significant
problems elsewhere in the treatment flow,including concentrations of bacteria-laden solid waste.
Proponents of turbidity analyzers say they provide quicker feedback than lab samples. In California,
they have been approved for use at some public and private treatment plants that discharge into streams
and rivers that are more sensitive to, and less able to dilute,highly turbid waste water.
Initially, sanitation district officials told the inspector the$5,400 monitor was used for a short-term
research project after the agency recorded an over-the-limit turbidity reading in 1994. When asked for
findings of the research project,officials told The Times the system actually was installed in 1996 as
part of an upgrade to the Huntington Beach sampling station. They said it was never used for research
and was abandoned after tests showed turbidity readings that did not correspond with lab samples.
A series of water board inspection reports reviewed by The Times shows that water regulators got
involved in January 2001,when inspector Julio Lars noticed a pinkish tint to the waste water at the
sampling station, along with high turbidity readings. After visiting the plant several times over the next
10 months,he discovered the system's calibration scales were set at levels lower than the legal limits.
Sometimes, he noted, the meter would flat-line at the top of that preset limit for hours.
"The turbidity trend resembled a horizontal line with occasional downward peaks," Lara wrote in one of
his reports. "These findings may indicate that[the sanitation district] may be exceeding effluent turbidity
limitations."
However,the agency's own reports,based on daily laboratory samples, showed no violations during the
same period, Lara noted.
During the course of his inquiry, Lam said he was assured that technicians were trying to correct the
problem. He also reported that a work order was issued to repair, clean and recalibmte the system in
February 2001,and that the technician assigned the task told him in September 2001 that the equipment
"normally worked without problem and that the instrument's output turbidity signal was accurate to the
best of his knowledge."
The system was removed shortly after sanitation officials met privately with Lara on Oct. 16 to discuss
his findings and his recommendation that the monitor be fixed and incorporated by the agency as a
http://www.latimes.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=la"/o2D000006837jan27 02/15/2002
Los Angeles Times: Sewage Issue Murky With Gauge Gone Page 3 of 3
permanent,mandatory measurement tool
During that meeting, sanitation officials argued strongly against Lara's proposed new requirements.
They characterized the use of the analyzer as "merely an unsuccessful experiment," saying that it was
"abandoned and inexplicably... left operating and generating and storing data. "
Late,who apparently was dissatisfied with that answer,wrote a report after the meeting in which he said
he was studying the issue and may urge the water board to require the sanitation district to install a
permanent turbidity analyzer.
The inquiry might seem a relatively minor matter,but for the waiver issue.Environmentalists want the
district to treat the waste water it pipes offshore to the same standard required of the vast majority of the
nation's 16,000 sanitation agencies.
But district officials estimate it would cost an additional$400 million or more annually if they lose the
waiver,which expires next year. They maintain that the discharged sewage,known as a plume, does not
harm the environment or public health.
However, environmentalists and other critics have long derided the agency's monitoring practices as
self-serving. They note that sanitation officials,after saying consistently that the plume never comes
closer than a mile off the coast,revealed last year that their own data show it regularly coming within a
half mile of Newport Beach since 1987. Some scientists have theorized the plume may have contributed
to the closure of large stretches of the Huntington Beach shoreline in the summer of 1999.
Opponents of the waiver hope they can persuade a majority of the 25-member sanitation district board to
abandon any pursuit of a new five-year waiver.
Ifyou want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.convarchives. For information
about reprinting this article, go to w .lats.comhlehts.
MAA Relax... Have fun...
Let us help around the house.
http://www.latimes.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=la°/"2D000006837jan27 02/15/2002
Los Angeles Times: Stirring Up the Water Page I of 2
j�Cooss�Angolesdimes ;-fiF_
� - . . - .
ball COM.
Qni '
h '/ttp /www.latimes.com/editions/orange/1Q0008503febO3.story
ORANGE COUNTY PERSPECTIVE
Stirring Up the Water
February 3 2002
Concern about water quality off Huntington Beach has dominated the public debate in Surf City in
recent years. Beach closings in past summers have cast a shadow over an entire recreation industry.
Also, the Orange County Sanitation District's waiver from the Clean Water Act,permitting the discharge
of sewage offshore that is only partially treated, has stirred a storm of controversy.
One would think that clean,clear water would be getting all the attention it could. But now we learn that
last fall,the district took a monitoring device that measures the cloudiness of water out of a Huntington
Beach treatment plant shortly after a meeting with a state water-quality inspector. The inspector
questioned whether the device,which is voluntary,was improperly calibrated and was giving false
readings.
The inspector thus wondered whether the sewage that was going into the ocean actually exceeded legal
limits for turbidity.Though not required, such monitors can provide an extra layer of feedback,
something this district in particular should want to have,given the scrutiny it is under. The Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Control Board apparently agrees. As the chief enforcement arm for federal and
state discharge permits,it is looking at requiring the district to reinstall the device.
When faced with the possibility of being required to reinstall the monitor, the district signaled its
opposition. It argued that its current daily lab samples are enough to be sure that partially treated sewage
passes muster under clean-water guidelines, and, in general, seems to regard having the additional layer
of monitoring as something in the realm of an experiment.
This type of monitoring no doubt measures only one of many variables in water quality. But these are
important times for the district when sending the right signal on its resolve to thoroughly test water is
important. There is a lot of pressure for the district to treat the wastewater to the same standard as other
agencies across the nation, and the case for not renewing the waiver is strong.
Given that the waiver renewal is on the table,the district ought to be taking any extra steps to be sure
there is public confidence in the current level of treatment. The district,after all, is the largest public
agency in the country with a Clean Water Act waiver and discharges 243 million gallons a day of
partially treated waste water 41/2 miles offshore.
Meanwhile,with all this on its plate,the district is asking the state to allow it to take on urban runoff.It's
a nice sentiment,but changing the district's charter to broaden its work seems like too much to take on at
this particular time. What it really needs to do is get its house in order, and prepare for the likelihood of
having to meet a tougher clean-water standard.
http://www.latimes.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=la%2D000008503febO3 02/14/2002
Los Angeles Times: Stirring Up the Water Page 2 of 2
Ifyou want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. For information
about reprinting this article, go to w .lats.com/rit:hts.
http://www.latimes.com/templates/misc/printstary.jsp?slug=la"/n2D000008503febO3 02/14/2002
For Sanitation District's Critics,the Issue Is Clear Page 1 of 4
EE Greek National Toodsm Orgill tian
SSI I
F.Irnl.IBg2 -'I Talk about 4 S-mail `Print edit
-Caswort weeOO�Bde LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Homes
Rentals
lealospaper Ms For Sanitation District's Critics, the
calenclarlhits
Issue Is Clear
moyies.Musk.�,Dining Re "Sewage Issue Gets Murky,"Jan.27:
CaliforniaTimes Headlines
The stale I'm not surprised at all that the Orange County
Lae Angelee Sanitation District removed a turbidityslate water Boats oo
Orange County meter--a Tough Runoff Rules for
Thn Valley pollution monitoring device--when the readings Southern O.C. _
Vaawra co"iy showed the treated sewage to be cloudier than
$ King of Tecales Is Deposed XXXXX
°J allowed.
Steve Harvey Shah's Son to Speak in Irvine
Paler H.King
sine taaax It should be expected that when the sewage is Residence Issue Hits Boyd
Pan Mormon Foe
George Skelton only treated halfway that the sewage would be
Good Tim cloudy. This should be a wake-up call to the Me Held in Fatal Beating
Inside Politics public. Demand the sanitation district treat the more>
hie Classroom
s wheel
In me C sewage to full secondary standards before
In
surroundingsreleasing it into the ocean. Demand the SUBSEMBS to the
othe,mew sanitation district give up its waiver,which to s AnyelesTimes.
lick here
"=_ allows halfway treatment. I know what makes
aurbank teeder
Daly nkPilot that sewage cloudy' It's toilet water. I want a clean ocean, one that is not
Huntington 6sacn polluted by sewage.
independent
Inland valley
News press Karin Moran
The world
The Nation Surfrider Foundation
WlNornla/Local _
Business politics San Clemente
_Sp_aem _._.____
Tachnolopy________ e
Travel
Editorials O -Ed
;isictlopq'�;. Evidence continues to mount that the Orange County Sanitation District is
Ads a Entertainment putting its own interests above the public's health and welfare. Once again,
Books P B P $
Columns data is suppressed that points toward potential health effects from the
Education district's sewage discharges into the ocean.
Health
Highway 1
Moral This time, a turbidity monitor has been rigged such that it cannot give high
Obituaries readings,even if the water being tested is fully contaminated. This is akin
Real Estate
Religion to rigging a thermometer to go no higher than 98.6 degrees,regardless of
Science So.cal.living the the health of the patient.
Sunday Opinion
ForM Poll
Far the Record Turbidity is an indirect test for fecal matter in water. The more fecal
k +TRu:>T:' Tt
http://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/la-000008505feb03.story 02/14/2002
For Sanitation District's Critics, the Issue Is Clear Page 2 of 4
Editions articles, the murkier the water and the higher the turbidity levels. It is a
F -c,ti,r P gh tY
"., ,,, testing requirement under both California and federal law,despite the
Ut . � district's protestations that their testing is voluntary and not pertinent to the
Extras
c Coeneabm water quality of their discharge.
B"weepepsmkes
DiscLssion Boards /
Crd.om Based on their history of cover-ups and obfuscation, their assurances that
Lottery°a there are no ill health effects at our swimming beaches are not worth the
Traffic paper their press releases are written on.
weather
_Multimedia
Enter Keywo This type of action is a reflection of the attitude of top management and is
F-- ® unacceptable. It is time for change at the district. Top management should
Detailed search _ be thrown out along with their 301(h)waiver. » a
SITE MAP
Coo Andco Matra Orange County deserves full sewage treatment and disinfection prior to
Subscription Se"eces discharge into our ocean.
DesiveryStAoscriptiors
Gift Subscription College Discount
Robert J. Caustin
Mail Subscriptions
Additional Subscription
Founding Director,
MARKETPLAa
classineds and mums Defend the Bay,Newport BeachHomes
Rentals
y
cars
r I
"sea,per Ads
Shopping
In a medical laboratory,the instruments that run tests are calibrated daily
Times Guides
with an industry standard.
to Times Initiatives
T'-es'n Education Then commercial samples with known concentrations are run through as
Fcaoms by e
u Times Books test samples. If the reading on these samples is not within the given range,
Summer camp program a new batch of standard material is used to recalibrate and a new batch of
Times-Minor Foundation
Community Events samples is run. If the samples don't fall within the given range again, then
Insidethaide theme you can deduce that the instrument is not working and send someone to fix
it.
- - Of course this is all recorded and documented because the laboratory has
J_ J
I a Opin162111, many inspections during the year for quality assurance.
In their inspection,it was noted that Orange County Sanitation District did
not properly calibrate its instrument.If the district was using that
instrument to monitor turbidity as one of the 120 indices required under
the Clean Water Act for having the 301(h) waiver permit to discharge
partially treated sewage into the ocean,then they were in violation of that
requirement. They should not be allowed to renew the waiver.
Kris Hardeman
Fullerton
r
Orange County Sanitation District doesn't like what their turbidity gauge
http://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/la-000008505febO3.story 02/14/2002
For Sanitation District's Critics, the Issue Is Clear Page 3 of 4
indicates, so it gets rid of the gauge.
They don't like what their own 1996 20-meter study found, so they don't
publish the report. They don't like the public outcry opposing the waiver
allowing the ocean dumping of partially treated sewage, so they ignore the
public.
The issue may be murky,but the pattern is clear.
Dennis Baker
Corona del Mar
w
News that the Orange County Sanitation District dismissed data from, and
ultimately removed, a turbidity meter that was showing readings
indicating excessive turbidity of treated sewage is not totally out of
character.
In 1996,scientists at the district did a 20-meter study,which showed
elevated fecal bacteria in the water column that would have jeopardized
their ocean discharge permit,had it been known. However, this study was
not released to the public until 2000, well after the permit renewal period,
and well after the sanitation district got the rules changed in 1997 to
accommodate the data.
Even to this day,a formal report on this study has never been released,
despite promises by the district over seven months ago to do so. It is this
lack of candor and openness that casts doubt on the sanitation district's
ability to monitor itself. The simple and elegant solution to this dilemma is
to require the sanitation district to give up its waiver from full secondary
treatment requirements of the Clean Water Act.
At an estimated$50 a year for the average family in Orange County,this
is an affordable safeguard that when people go to the beach, they can be
confident that sewage particles from the sanitation district's ocean outfall
won't come back to haunt them.
]an D. Vandersloot
Newport Beach
If you want other stories on this topic,search the Archives at latimes.com/archives.For
Information about reprinting this article,go to ~.lats.commights. -�,1�
THOUSANDS OF PLACES 'TO SEE._�„rW,,'
- r
http://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/la-000008505febO3.story 02/14/2002
EPA backs renewal of S.D. sewage waiver
city seeks to continue lessstdngent treatment
Lay Terry Rodgers
STAFF VAaTFR
Fab(uary 12,2e02
The U.S.Eovironmental protection Agency yesterday said it supports allowing San Diego to
coutinue treating its sewage at a less-stringent level than required by the federal Clean Water
Acf.
The EPA's intentions were contained in a draft wastewater permit that would grant the city's
request to mnew San Diego's waiver from tougher federal requirements for five more years
The Metropolitan Wastewater Department has been operating under a waiver since the sarly
1980s.
If the perneit is approved later this year,San Diego would be able to continue using advanced
primary treatment—which is far less costly and removes about 85 percent of solids—at its
Point lama sewer plant.
The Clear Water Act requires most sewer agencies to use secondary treatment,which
removes more solids and more chemical and biological agents that deplete oxygen in water.
Oxygen depletion from sewage effluent is less of a danger To marine life than to species in
fresh water.
The cities and counties of Las Angeles and San Francisco have secondary sewage uratmeut
systems.Goleta,near Santa Barbara,and Orange County also have sewer agencies that have
waivers from the requirement
AlthoughSan Diego officials haven't examined the EPA's draft permit in detad,they said they
believe the ruling may signal a new em of cooperation with federal regulators.
'The EPA's draft permit is fair and reasonable,"said San Diego Mayor Dick Murphy."I think
it will protect our ocean environment without impinang undue financial burdens on city
ratepayers."
The waiver from secondary treatment is important because it allows San Diego to
accommodate the region's growth and increases in sewage,including those caused by rain
stories,without having to expand plant capacity.
The Point Lama treaunent plant currently discharges an average of t9n million gallons of
effluent per day,bat the plant is capable of treating up to 24o million gallons per day.
If San Diego had to upgrade to secondary treatment,the Point Lama plant wouldn't be able
to treat as much sewage and it would be more costly to operate,said Scot Tu➢och,director of
The Metropolitan Wastewater Department
A key issue in the proposed discharge permit is how regulators would apply Provisions of the
Oeean pollution Reduction Act—legislation that in t995 gave San Diego an opportunity to
apply for The waiver despite missing the deadline.
The law,which was an amendment to the Clean water Act.requires the city in remove So
percent or more of suspended solids from its sewage and To build Peru treatment planes that
would create 45 million gallons per day of reclaimed water.It also puts a tap of 12 metric
ions per year on sewage solids released from the caps outfa➢pipe 41/2 miles Tom the axon.
The city insists that the law and its sewage-matmem requirements expired after one year,
the EPAmntends otherwise.
Alexis Straus of the EPA's Regional Office in San Ftanuasco said the language in the draft
discharge permit shnuldn't create a confrontation with the city over the Oscan Pollution
Reduction Act.
"I don't Think ifs an issue at this time,but at some point the city will wish to have that
clarified,"said Strauss.
Robert Simmons,a lawyer and executive board member for the San Diego Sierra Chub,said
he will read the draft permit closely to e=Are that the EPA isnt allowing San Diego's sewage
treatment To,be anything less than required by the Ocean Pollution Reduction Act.
"We're prepared To go To couar to ensure that the law is enforced,"said Simmons."The
requirements of the ocean Pollution Reduction Act are important in protecting the marine
and human environment."
Dade: Jamrary 21.2W2
Orange Cwnty Sanilalbn Distr
Monthly Log or Odor Complaints-2002
•__________________________________________________________'____'
PIANT NO.t
Jan Feb Mar Ma Jun Jul s 1 Oct If Kw n Dec
tM ro Y4 n0
P15 nD
]I6 n0
WN
n1Mtl
To a: D D
PLANT N0.2
Jan yl Fab Mar i M Jun Jul Aa Sep 0. I Now 1 Dec I
ire nD
1/1]nD
WN
rWIeU
TDW: 0
Jan H Feb Mar Aur 11 htgru jan Jul I Au sa Oct 11 aw Oaa If
ynm Y1
,.am 2/1
rz2 re N w
1rzs nD za
1R6
1R9 110
IRD M
llap 110
CLYYI
�NaW
W, , 3 M�- - "T. TDYI Ttlal Tebl TObI TMN TMN Tdtl Tpbl TOItl
IH=IrvHoaae mmDWIM.are rot wuntetl as plant relatetl(InNcelBp beglnN�p Meml12001).
1u0:ysH:d:11
g:de=atdtal mtDdm Complaints. gAs
$oWo L�r fEL
February 15,2002
Stephen Burgard
Los Angeles Times
Dear Mr. Burgaed;
Re:Ken Maddox secondary sewage treatment legislation
Crying"near all the sewage fully now"rakes great headlines for politicians to beech
cities and Sacramento. Wow,citizens think my guy is great,be is an environmentalist-
However,unlike politicians in Sacramento,the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Sanitation District wants evidence,prior to voting,that the expenditure of tax dollars will
yield benefit. This issue risks a capital expense of 400 million dollars and an anmW
operating cost of 15 million dollars. Presently scientists are testing the ocean to find a
link between the bacteria on the beach and the ocean outfall pipe 4 miles off shore. A
definitive link between the two has never been found. The sanitation district is spending
5 million dollars in research on this matter. A report will be completed in March. Should
any link be found,the Board of Directors will immediately institute the proper policy to
solve the problem Positive evidence of the environmental benefit needs to precede any
taxpayer expense of hundreds of millions of dollars. There is no documented
improvement in ocean water quality tests in the South Bay since full secondary treatment
was instituted by the City of Los Angeles. A more likely culprit of bacteria in the surf is
urban run off from the storm drams, Talbert Marsh and Sama Ana River.
Presently all the sewage m fully trceded. One half a treated once and blended with the
other balf that is treated twice.Fully treatmg all the sewage twice will have a significant
adverse impact on the environment. More sludge will be hauled to inland counties for
agricultural usage. This will require more energy to process, increase truck traffic and air
pollution.
Orange County Sanitation District is in compliance with all state and federal laws. The
State Water Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency must
approve the discharge permit renewal.Professionals whose job is to protect the marine
ecosystem and water quality at our beaches accomplish this oversight. This is not Arthur
Anderson overseeing Enron.
Ken Maddox has not spoken recently with the sanitation district. Chireus are best served
by politicians knowing all the facts before introducing legislation. Especially legislation
that has no chance of passmg and merely gams the author a newspaper story.
Russell Patterson,
City Council Member, City of Villa Park
Member Board of Directors,
Orange County Sanitation District
Day 714 282 7292,Eve 714 538 2731,Cell 714 624 4569
a Ztf3-0766 PArrERSON (n
PAGE 03
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0� $ NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS M zk Z9-
Name of Paper 'T!';mmitmenttoiHealth,
Subject
L. A. Times Sanitation Dct
Ecology Unfairly Slighted
• On June 18 You published a commentary With regard in the removal of lode 1n an cra of diminishing natural reaure-
. by Patrick C. Wall cancerpmg Ne county Materials (runt otm discharge. industrial. el,inaee®ng oil dmpmd.atr-malitY con.
MOO tattoo dutrieu'application for Comm- source control of modes Is the correlamn, terns from energy genenuoq the gteen-
uation of their ocean dunhnrge waiver of our pregam We have successfully bottom effect sod regional trmspartauon
r',Movtng the World Is a Ioaer's lob"). ..=tied the discharge of pollutants to problems (trucking sludge, for example),
Mr.Wall's opponent dkmrterest in the truth levels that are an I"that the nw sewage there is a heed to took at the national and
and hw oisiepreamtauan of the facet are a entering cur wane-water treatment facto- global picture in put things into petspec.
real doceanate,On any ecologically minded m is amd1Y better than the effluent live. The basic Law of ecology mindam
mien sir organuatmn havoc a sincere thalostri a standards for full secondary, that we look at the macro consequences of
interest in and dedo scion to eespowible treatment imposed by the EPA and the our azuooe—ompw NetWmo effects.
overall etfsirorrrnenul management and star of California ten on,ocean diwharge. The gavmmng (eddy of the tanidtion
protection. Over the Last Id Years. we lave reduced district v composed of dedicated mmmu-
First. the article meorrerdy slates that the discharge of todc Materials by ge%- any leaden. council members and board
the districts dump partially treated sewage Me. Wall also, eevneauly mtphea that otmibes reineaenong the 24 rot®mitlea
offshore. We provide a Wend of 59% fed we will expand our treatment capacity only and mrrurp=tcd IernmrY and the 21
secondary treaeveet and e7% advanced it regtde"in provide aim meo dar,teat- ®Ilion nmieumend ecrvN b➢the districts.
Primary onsatmmt,which rneets the aura teem to an of our lbw. We have an 1 can, Maine you Net they take their
Californiaushed the 1]Ivtronmmtel fio or- Meet the en mWp�=it sewage eeds a in designed to roP Preponderance of mm wry Aftiom�. only �
'Agency under the provwmu of Sec- Mour service aroa andetMrenuY have e205 engineering and ecnmrom evidence com-
aon Sat(b1 of the federel Clean W mer Act, mnlion worth of facilities under eontornc- pned by an uWepeMsnt team of consu Ling
which allow. the ocean discharge of a riet. arrorher $170 rodimu worth under eqp did the mmetrutbowd m u of reemxs
hlgb-quality but leas than full seeandary design, including additional secondary determine that mnunuatim of Neu erist-
effluent for only these trea®errt planet tea®enL and 8112 million worth In the Ing warm-water management Progan.
that can prove their discharge Will an - plannlgsages The program will Mitt$1.5 winch operates pmatant to the Met
adversely affect marine water quality. bWlnnbytheyear200. provislmd of the federal Clean Water Am
Contrary to the sutemrrn in the atomic Who de u ing if we should mmtruct b in the best overall inf6E+ta of the
thedfsincahaveneverallowedthedirgr_ toll seeoodarY ne.Weett faolitim. we ,,oars of Orange County.It will enable us
Mg of mttreated sewage min cow al ins- ca tint conscientiously livery to On, tax- to commove W maintain fishable and swum-
ter:P'urtber.W ere is absolutely on build- PSYMrs an additional SIA-buuon ripen- noble m—W water in an efficient eflec-
up of mud resrltnds on the ocean floor.and toe (more than dnuhlmf the residents' live mantter.
Wee Is no vivbde damage arntad the wets)fen a nominal me.eare in mmvul of The doo icd' duretos and staff take
a Wan. as Mr. Wan mntm3s. In fact. the organic aonda when acentmc data gath- great pride on our Many mcmopus necom
outrW ittelf is meeting with MMne fife eyed over the past five years through a We are roengnbrd ar one sl the loading
Red --Mtdo an underwater reef. Piah f10-million ocean monitoring Program We are
razed u n agencies the l a the
caught Pool and Orange County s exist Meet all l o>`'dro evideroce Indicating, that public
$fig Administration standards, health and the Marine mvtrmment ere mmdry. The cuoMesa of Our programs in
Likewe-the emmmem=plying a prof- now being protected The Irwa✓ marae protecting Public health and the onion
ranee for AsPnanR of sludge at tandnlla w oaya"Mit slmply a rot threatened by the � off (range Camty's emstnne
over recycling a macro Just a few dinned'p*egivot Ente eot zrmn s fine and providing balanced alai emironmen-
short Years ago. so, of on, sludge way the Scripps InnoNuob of Oceanography tat matagement is supported by the mulls
trucked to a landfill Today. almost two- - have signed that full seoadary u,,nent of ter orgoing ocean roolotori g and
thirds ofit w sa re fely eyeled by composition for deEp-ocean dischargers would be a maearch programs and is exe opitf di by
ar direct agricultural land app4cauon. We waafeaf l2XP y s'fund& the r umeoas federal. sum and regional
elPect N reach our goal of 100% recycling FWI —dory treatmem arc low rig- awards of e¢ellence the dMm,, have
M the near fntMee Incidentally. the mar- niflrard adverm, emfmnmmul a feti& received
ke[place does net pry for sludge sludge These include more etteea on land frcan
casts t)le d mare
dtaptaal istricts Nan S93 sludge disPaaat Increased energy use. A.B.CATLIN
Mi
llion per Year.Then reality is that Ili,row much greater deimutin of month reroute- - Chanm Boston of l)itectoo Znsport and poea e sludge means we mind ntmeav emuWam, ]Dint
c t 1e11 It fen rit 6 pro Therefore. an Orange CotmysamtatimDaoims
id, a.e in sludge quantitrea rtsultm Cmmtal FUllerum City Council
full g4oln Orange County i�ttefs
aeeorudry treatment would azo,aay
IneRa.m radpgyerf m06[p. a110el mr40 Y .der wed ea nyfatl w
fvEnaalb�Te.P m6i erdere sbMue vC
eat a Nlaev.we.far klren W�131]a]-TevY9 p
.iJtn
1/Inw to tro Edta,tot MOew ierea (�aacai0ntmr. UWvp¢d. ;
Time9MvwrSarrt,w]ardeaa gp�,a ..:
Ierlwr en Ownae m,n[Y iwvrmrye.Anti s]axENagcsan ae.s.T1gessssm laneaata F6w,tie Terp,orsye rimy " ..r�wfi� oare�T a.e&ntt
�3rxawnuna.e..Mecaaw pp.X
M V SXXIII)10
to questions about...
Buena Park Construction Project:
Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer
• Background The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)will install
approximately 2,700 feet of sewer pipe and manholes in Crescent Avenue,
between Western Avenue and Knott Avenue in the City of Buena Park.
The project is scheduled to begin in February 2002 and end in June 2002.
--4= Due to planned future developments, including hotel and resort facilities and the
recently opened Knott's Berry Farm water theme park,the existing Western
Avenue sewer is no longer big enough to serve the area.
The new sewer is designed to allow sewage to flow quicker, preventing the
_ v c production of gases,which can result in odors and corrosion of the sewer pipe.
The existing sewer on Western Avenue will remain fully operational during
construction.After completion of the new sewer pipe, a portion of the existing
wastewater flow will be diverted to the new pipe.
• Construction Process A new 21-inch diameter sewer pipeline will be
constructed in the two center lanes of Crescent Avenue, using open trench
excavation. Construction will begin at the intersection of Crescent Avenue and
Knott Avenue and travel eastward along Crescent Avenue to the intersection
at Western Avenue. The open cut method of laying pipe will require periodic
r street closures.
e
Open trench excavation is done by digging and reinforcing a trench for safety.
They lay the pipe in the trench, remove the reinforcements and back-fill the trench
and the affected streets in the area will be repaved when the project is complete,
DistrictOrange County
Sanitation The trench will be approximately 5 feet wide and 14 feet deep and will be
protected 24 hours a day with concrete barriers on both sides(see Figure 1).
Vision— The trench will be covered with steel plating during non-working hours.
To maintain world-class Equipment will be stored within the concrete barriers to prevent any disruption
of traffic during non-working hours. Security fencing will be used to further
and water resource protect the construction site and equipment.
aranagenjent • Traffic Impacts Construction occurring along Crescent Avenue will be
completed in the first two phases. Each phase will last approximately two
months. During construction,traffic on Crescent Avenue will be reduced to one
lane in each direction.The first phase will be constructed from Knott Avenue,
eastward to slightly west of Pierce Drive.The second phase will continue from
west of Pierce Drive to Western Avenue. During construction along Crescent
Avenue, access to Santa Fe Drive, Pierce Drive, Santa Berta Way and Santa
Domingo Way will be from westbound Crescent Avenue only.
Construction occurring at the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Knott Avenue
1;44 Ellis Avenue and at the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Western Avenue will be limited
Fountain to 10 days at each intersection. During these phases of construction,traffic
1 : 118 Valley, on Crescent Avenue will be diverted onto Knott Avenue and Western Avenue.
for more information Maps showing detours(see Figure 2)will be posted locally and on OCSD's
website at www.ocsd.com.
or visit our web site ...continued on other side
OCSD/011202/0range-Mate,Relief Sewecad, page
Each day, dirt from the trench will be removed from the site. Dust prevention measures
will be in place,including covering all trucks and sweeping and watering Construction areas.
The contractor will use preventative measures to assist in eliminating the discharge of odors
and noise from its operations. Since the Orange-Western Sewer is a new sewer line, residents
will not smell odors during the construction of this project.
• Construdion Hours Construction will occur between 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM,with the
exception of work within the intersections of Crescent and Western Avenues and Crescent
and Knott Avenues.At those intersections regular work hours will be between 7:00 AM and
9:00 PM.No work shall be performed on weekends or federal holidays.
• For More Information Additional information is available about the Orange-Westem
Sewer Project. Please contact Sonja Wassgren, public information coordinator,Orange County
Sanitation District at(714)593-7122. During the construction process, information can also be
obtained from the City of Buena Park at(714)5623902.
Fgure 1: Construction Detail
q Neighborhood access street
k ri traffic will not be able to
cross construction to tum Trench surrounded
y{, - left(Ent)an Crescent Am.`, l by cement barriers
9lti �
During Intersection work,eastbound
traffic will not be able to cross
,* Intersection and w0 be detoured
NOTE:During street construction,Crescent Avenue will have
one traffic lane open to East and Westbound traffic at all times.
Figure 2: Detour Map and Directions
Construdian scheduled to begin February 2002 and end in Janro 2002
La Palma Ave. N • PhowI Intersection:Eastbound traffic on Crescent Ave.-go
Q� a W+E .--). (opprox 10 days) South on Knott Ave..East on Lincoln Ave..
�. S Nonh on western Ave.to Crescent Ave.
OG�jB ,`m E Sena nano y Phase 2 street work: Neighborhood access street traffic going
ante or. m -J� (approx 2 months) eastbound on Crescent Ave.-go North on
Santa Fe Dr.,East on Santa Clare St..
P " South on Pierce Dr.to Crescent Ave.
Crescent Ave.
sane o phase 3 street work: Neighborhood access street going
ww
ammo .-► (approx 2 mender) eastbound Crescent Ave:go North on v m Santa Domingo
go Nin go Way,or North on Recce Dr.
and Easton Santa Elena Dr..then South
nimmm u o a on Western Ave.to Crescent Ave.
Neighborhood n access street traffic going
Pierce Dr.tl on Crescent Ave.-go South on
PieNorth n and West on Crescenumorst
Dr.,Nan
Lincan Ave. I North on Knott Ave.[o Crescent Ave.
Phase a 1ntersedion: Eastbound mffican Crescent Ave.-go
topprox 10 days) South on western Ave..Feet an Lincoln
Ave..North on Grand Ave.to Crescent Ave.
OCSD/01170210rva,-Wnlsr Relld 5ermcdr M.2
Public Advisory Committee (PAC2) Workshop Meeting Minutes
Interim Strategic Plan Update-Workshop#1
November 7,2001
Administrative Offices
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,California 92708-7018
Attendees:
OCSD Staff: Blake Anderson,Dave Ludwin,Bob Ghirelli,Bob Ooten,Lisa
Murphy,Jim Herberg
Consultants: Kellene Bum-Roy(CDM),Heather Boyle(CDM), Paul Gustafson
(CDM), Steve Hough(Carollo),Doug Lanning(Carollo), Michelle
Tuchman(NCG Porter Novelli)
PAC2 members: List attached
Introduction
Kelli Bum-Roy opened Workshop#1 and acted as facilitator. Each of the PAC2 members
introduced themselves.
She gave a brief introduction of the new Interim Strategic Plan Update project. The project will
be conducted on two separate yet concurrent"tracks":
• Two-track process
• Technical information
• Stakeholder input
In this manner,the technical.development of the project can proceed and, at the same time,
receive comments, suggestions and assistance from the PAC2 members. Kelli then reviewed the
agenda.
History and Objectives
Blake Anderson,Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD or District) General Manager,
welcomed the PAC2 members Plan. In that effort, two advisory committees reviewed the
planning and rate development processes. With advice from these committees, the District's
Board of Directors (Board) selected a planning direction,and they developed a rate structure
based on flow and strength of sewage.
In this project,these two committees have been combined into a single group to form PAC2.
The PAC2 members have three main roles in facilities planning under this project:
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7,2001
Page 2 of 7
• Help develop criteria for decision-making
• Provide independent input and review
• Help staff craft recommendations to the Board
Blake emphasized that the Board will make all decisions; the work done under this project will
help them make the final planning direction decisions.
The PAC2 members raised a number of questions:
Q: Will rate structure be reviewed now?
A: No, the recommendation remains a Board decision. OCSD must adhere to Proposition
218 regarding allocation of costs for services
Q: Does this impact the charges in cities' labor rates?
A: No,this work is not connected to cities' labor rates.
Q: Is cost the only factor?
A: No. We will use a range of criteria, and PAC2 will help define these criteria.
Q: Will the Board understand the range of opinions?
A: Yes. We hope for a measure of consensus,but consensus is not a goal.
Review of the 1999 Strategic Plan
Jim Herberg, OCSD Engineering Manager,noted that the first Master Plan was prepared for
OCSD in 1946. Since that time, a plan has been prepared approximately every 7 years. He then
reviewed the 1999 Strategic Plan and summarized the key elements and recommendations that
were made in that work, including the large number of possible alternatives considered in the
Strategic Plan development.
Based on the results of the Strategic Plan, the Board decided to(1)treat wastewater to secondary
level for use in the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR)Project; scheduled to go on-line in
November 2005,and(2) produce a blend of primary and secondary effluent that would meet the
discharge permit requirements. Alternatives were favored that limited the use of the 78-inch
outfall to once every three years.
The PAC2 members raised the following questions:
Q: Since the Groundwater Replenishment System was an option in some of the original
Strategic Plan alternatives, and since the Groundwater Replenishment System is now a
reality, does this indicate that some of the original alternatives are no longer valid?
A: Correct.
Q: Is the plan to use the 78-inch outfall once every 3 years consistent with Regional Water
Quality Control Board?
NeadWatallwp.dtaWdminN30\PAC 2TAC 2 11.07.01 Workshop minutes-Revised 1-15.02.doc
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7, 2001
Page 3 of 7
A: Yes, it is consistent with their definition of"emergency use.
Q: Will the amount of sewage flows be reviewed again and updated?
A: Yes,as a part of the next phase. A lot has happened to reduce flows(conservation,slow
economic growth--industries,etc.),and this information needs to be considered.
Q: Concern with an environmental health aspect; specifically,the plan to use the 78-inch
outfall once every 3 years(projected storm period)is too short—should it be 60 or 100
years?
A: We will address this in the Strategic Plan Update.
Q: What about reducing rainfall effects?
A: Flows in the wastewater system can double during a rainstorm event. Some inflow and
infiltration reduction can be expected through the District's Cooperative Projects
Program; now funded at$3M,and want to go to$10M. Also,water conservation is an
important factor(through toilet retrofits,etc.).
Q: How much of a flow reduction is there?
A: Flow monitors are being installed to measure flow before and after a rainstorm event to
quantify changes.
Q: How many cross-connections are there with storm drains?
A: Unknown at this time.
Q: Are you managing dry weather flows? What are the quantities?
A: Yes. The District is currently diverting dry weather flows. A flow-monitoring program
will measure the amount of flow over the next 5 years.
Q: Did the Board adopt a recommended alternative?
A: Yes, they did. They adopted both the 1999 Strategic Plan and the associated
Environmental Impact Report(EIR).
Q: Are new developers using low flow equipment?
A: Yes. Developers are required to do so by county plumbing codes.
Purpose of the Strategic Plan Update
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, reviewed the reasons for updating the Strategic Plan:
• Existing Strategic Plan is 5 years old;must address to meet future needs
• Changes in size of population/service area and regulations
• Permit renewal next 12-14 months
The District is currently maintaining a blend of effluent to the ocean better than the permit
requirements; the current effluent is a 50:50 blend of primary and secondary treated effluent. It
is important to note that the current discharge permit does not exclude the District from
1VeadWaU,11Wp.dle1admin11301PAC 21PAC 211.07.01 Worksrpp mimdes-Revised 1-15.02.doc
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7,2001
Page 4 of 7
complying with federal discharge regulations regarding water quality;the permit"waiver"
requires the District to produce effluent that is consistent with appropriate discharge limits.
The District is conducting studies on beach closures;the results of these studies should be
completed and available next year.
Dave also pointed out that the Groundwater Replenishment System is a reality—an important
part of flow relief. The first phase will use 70 mgd of secondary effluent(initially in 2005),so
we need to understand the implication of diverting to the Groundwater Replenishment System
while maintaining our commitment to the current effluent quality target.
The PAC2 members had several questions:
Q: What happens with Reverse Osmosis backwash?
A: Microfiltration removes organics,RO the salts (brine). The brine from Reverse Osmosis
will go to the ocean
Q: Suspended solids concentration is 60 mg/I; currently at 55 mg/1. What about the
concentration? How about a higher level of treatment?
A: A range of treatment options will be considered and this data will be discussed with
stakeholders(PAC2)in the future.
Q: Brine is misleading as stating"only salt"It may be toxic to turtles.
A: The District is researching the effects of brines. Will discuss toxicity testing in the
future.
Q: How much sludge is removed from wastewater?
A: Currently,300,000 lbs/day is removed. This amount represents about 75%of the
installed capacity at both treatment plants.
Q: In the 1999 Strategic Environmental Impact Report Plan Scenario 2 the preferred
alternative. Will Environmental Impact Report need to be revised?
A: No revisions are required at this time. If an additional EIR is needed based on future
decisions,we will address then.
Dave noted that the District is looking at providing 70 mgd of secondary to the Groundwater
Replenishment System while maintaining a 50:50 blend of effluent to the ocean. However,the
Board has not adopted this particular scenario. This work with PAC2 will help Board make a
decision.
Q: Will one of the alternatives under consideration be full secondary?
A: Yes.
Q: The Orange County Register talked about additional fees?
Neadwaullwp.dtaladmin11301PAC ZPAC 211.07.01 Workshop minulesRevisee 1.15.02.doc
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7, 2001
Page 5 of 7
A: Not charging anything right now.
Q: Is an effluent less salty than the sea?
A: Yes. Seawater is about 5,000 ppm versus 1,100 ppm found in treated effluent.
Dave noted that Beach closures are an issue. Urban runoff is contributing to closures. Dry
weather flows are currently being diverted to the District for further treatment; 2.3 mgd is being
diverted at 6 locations (9 in Huntington Beach,4 OCFCD, 1 Newport), and an additional 0.6
mgd is to be added. Beach closures are now reduced by 50%based on postings. Bob Ghirelli,
stated that exceedances before 1999 were two times the current values, but could be influenced
by other factors also.
Q: What about rating the efficiency of diversions?
A: The District is working in conjunction with the Orange County Flood Control District
(OCFCD)to develop standard criteria. The OCFCD will determine priority of action and
the District will act accordingly to provide the diversions.
Q: Regarding the Talbert Marsh: currently accepting a 100% of the storm water.
A: Yes. The District has observed a total flushing, including bird wastes, etc. Diverting to
the pump station at Yorktown Avenue captures about-97%of this flow.
Q: What about diverting the Wintersburg flood control channel?
A: OCSD considering options for diverting this flow? OCSD will get information on dry
weather diversions. A task force is reviewing these issues.
Regarding biosolids, Dave Ludwin noted that OCSD is currently:
• Sending 24e/u to Kem Co.—Ban on Class B in 2003
• Sending 65%to King Co.—Ban on Class B in January 2003 (Looking for an extension)
• Sending 0% to Riverside Co.—Ban in force now
• Sending 11%to San Diego Co. —Currently, no plans to ban
Dave explained that OCSD is looking at Class A biosolids; he explained the differences between
Class A and Class B biosolids.
Q: How much Class B biosolids is the District generating now?
A: Class B volume= 625 tons/day (35 truck loads/day)
Q: Is Class B used in Orange County?
A: Only in landfills or for agricultural use. There's not much land available in Orange
County for use of biosolids.
Q: What is the cost difference between Class A and Class B biosolids?
A: Roughly, Class B costs $25/ton to produce and dispose,while Class A costs between
$40-$50/ton.
\VeadWata1\wp.dta\admin\130\PAC 2\PAC 2 11.07.01 Workshop minutes-Revised 1.15.02.doc
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7,2001
Page 6 of 7
Q: Are there options on-site at treatment plants to produce Class A biosolids?
A: Yes, and we are looking at these options.
Dave also discussed receiving lower flows than projected by the 1999 Strategic Plan. The
Strategic Plan projected the District to receive approximately 272 mgd in 2002,but the District is
actually treating about 241 mgd now. Possible reasons for the reduction in the wastewater flow:
• Effective water conservation program
• Infiltration and inflow reduction impacts
• Cultural changes; changes in business industry
Dave noted that the 2020 flow projection was 352 mgd.
Dave next reviewed the elements of the Interim Strategic Plan Update, and he looked at
opportunities for treatment technologies,pathogen reduction, and environmental tradeoffs.
Q: How are pathogens defined?
A: Virus and bacteria. Not looking at pharmacological impacts. The District will use permit
definition of pathogens.
Q: Will we do disinfection?
A: Disinfection will be considered for all treatment options
Q: Will you address different pathogen reduction options?
A: Yes,we will address pathogen reduction options.
Q: Will full secondary treatment reduce pathogens more than primary treatment?
A: Yes. Primary treatment reduces to 20m/l Oml,while secondary treatment reduces to
around 3.5m/l Oml. Pathogen reduction improves the end results even further.
Dave noted that other environmental issues,such as truck traffic, chemical usage,energy user,
and air issues would also be considered.
Regarding costs, Dave pointed out that both capital and O&M costs will be considered. The
District will need public input—help guide staff, using PAC2 values.
As noted,the District will be looking at different technologies:
• Traditional treatment(typical secondary)
• Alternative technologies Microfiltration(W)
• Pathogen reduction technologies -bleach,ozone, ultra violet(UV)
Lastly, Dave discussed the project schedule. The permitting process requires five workshops.
For this project,there will be several PAC2 workshops. OCSD will send out a letter that outlines
1VeadWalallwp.dtaladmi030WAC 2WAC 2 11.07.01 Wadoenop minutesRevBed 1-15.02.doc
PAC2-Workshop#1 Meeting Minutes
November 7, 2001
Page 7 of 7
the entire workshop schedule. In general, workshops will be conducted in the mornings from
8:00 am until 11:00 am, and they will be schedule to complete by the end of May 2002.
Q: Will a new EIR be needed?
A: Will need to assess the issue as we move forward
Q: Where is microfiltration used elsewhere in the wastewater industry?
A: Probably in Australia—Will provide a list,but small flows. Will present technical
information as it develops. Using it at West Basin Municipal Water District in Carson,
California.
Q: When does the District's current discharge permit expire?
A: Permit expires in June 2003. We have to submit a renewal application by December,
2002.
A: Please consider maximizing use of existing resources.
A: Need clear delineation of the options to make a sound decision on the parameters,effects
(impacts quantify)and costs
Q: Is this work a full feasibility study?
A: Yes,you can consider it as such—including impact on rates.
Q: Are there any economic input on coastal use/recreation use?
A: The District will research to find out if this information exists.
Q: Where do we get the expertise?
A: Consultants will provide the expertise..
Workshop#1 was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. Workshop#2 is scheduled for Thursday, January 29,
2002 at 8:00 a.m.
Distribution List:
All listed attendees
Sonja Wassgren
Angie Anderson
\11ead1data1\wp.dta\admtMi 30\PAC 21PAC 211.07.01 Workshop minutes-Revised 1-15.02.doc
Question Feedback Report
This"Question Feedback Report"contains responses to questions and concems from the November
PAC2 workshop.
1.) How often is the 78-inch outfall to be used?
The currently adopted Strategic Plan has a calculated need to use the outfall once every three years
at 2020 flows. In the past 25 years,the Orange County Sanitation District(District)has not used this
ouffall. The District continues to investigate additional ways to further mitigate peak flows to avoid the
usage of its emergency outfall facilities. The most current effort to potential use of our emergency
outfall is the Peak Flow Management Project,Job No.J-67. This project will install additional facilities
for the storage of more wastewater and in-plant storm water during peak flow events.
2.) What are the estimated Total Suspended Solids(TSS)in the oulfall effluent before and after the
Groundwater Replenishment System(GWRS)comes on-line?
TSS Values
52 mg/I 2000 Average(Source:on-file OCSD Operational Data)
53 mg/I estimated 2003 Average w/o GWRS(Source:Figure 16-4 Volume 4 1999 Strategic Plan)
58 mg/1 estimated 2003 Average w/GWRS(Source: Figure 16-4 Volume 4 1999 Strategic Plan)
57 mgfl estimated in 2020 Year with an Ocean Plan Level of Treatment(Preferred Altemative)with
Phase 3 GWRS(Source: Figure 16-4 Volume 4 1999 Strategic Plan)
3.) Is the District's 301(h)pefmit compliant with the Clean Water Act?
Yes,the Clean Water Act contains section 301(h)that governs deep water ocean discharges. This
topic will also be discussed at a future PAC2 workshop.
4.) What impact to effluent toxicity will GWRS have?
The Disrct is conducting bench-scale testing to determine toxicity with and without GWRS brine.
This topic is one of the many reasons that the District is conducting the Interim Strategic Plan Update.
5.) Is there more information about the urban runoff diversions?
Yes,see attachment"A"to this Feedback Form.
6.) Can we have information about the beach studies done to date?
The District,UCI, and USC have completed collecting data and are preparing the project report. The
report will be released in March 2001.
7.) Define the terms"Disinfection"and"Pathogen Reduction'
As being used at the PAC2 workshop, "Disinfection"means the inactivation(killing)of disease
causing microbes. Pathogen Reduction means reducing the number of viable disease causing
microbes. Thus,they are being used in the same context.
8.) Where is microfiltralion being used? What are the wastewater flows being treated?
See attachment"B"to this feedback form.
9.) Can the PAC2 information be posted on the Internet?
The District is working to have the PAC2 materials posted on the District's websile. These materials
are to include meeting agenda's, minutes,and documents distributed at the PAC2 workshops.
10.) Are you considering more efficient/effective use of current facilities?
The basic tenet of the 1999 Strategic Plan was to maximize the usage of existing facilities before
constructing new facilities. This will also be a basic tenet of Interim Strategic Plan.We will discuss
the use of existing facilities at future Workshops.
11.) Provide a clear delineation of options to PAC2 on the effects and costs?
The District continues to try to provide clear information for the public regarding all decision making
processes. During the PAC2 process, Staff will continue to try to provide clear information regarding
the potential options,effects and costs.
12.) Is the Interim Strategic Plan update a full feasibility study?
The Interim Strategic Plan Update will only contain feasible technologies and feasible treatment
options to meet each treatment goal. Thus, the project is a feasibility study.
13.) For future feedback on technical questions of concern during this process please feel free to
contact District Staff using the forth contained in Attachment C.
Attachment A
FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS AND PUMPING STATIONS
LOCATED WITHIN D, E, G & H WATERSHEDS
. Uninc. SANTA
ANA
_ WESTMINSTER ^r - Uninc.
SANrA - - TUS71N
-_ FOUN - �j ANA
VA
as �sssi eiNe. , t„ ••
HU C:R7N BEACH
BEACHamrw, nd
—� J Ldli 9321 AOWp4kA
Y 4o-'n R11 YOL
3W uUagln
.-6613Nm[m9
(�' cl WneadKnm 1]14rl flr d
_ vio L c.v os
CO6T am nrwr<iemi 'reembe raramvraw
MESA da.wee.mna a.ma .vameAwrue
Fl T ylryJunctictlon
. _L.1S lM0jp5h¢t L6ca19reet
-17 � IJ lMalamw9e'I,quEeS:
L
IRVINE
Uninc
AREA _ Cf, .�F q� a I�
OF p
INTEREST
Watershed Boundaries �`i_�{ 3` =Av
II-GREEWIUE-BANNNG CHANNEL \�.
LACUNA
V-THELONESTRORTKNI OF THE LCVvER SWTAAWRNERNATERSHED -
G-EAST COSTA MESAME4 MT BEACH tee• BEACH
H-LOS TRANCOSIMUDDY CREEK ter`. -
DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF county of orange, CA
DRY WEATHER URBAN
RUNOFF PUMP RATES :.
Urban Runoff Diversion Location Maximum Pump Maximum Pump Rate in Connection
Systems Design (GPM) GPM-Authorized by
OCSD
City of Huntington Beach(No permit has been issued yet). Flows are subject to change based upon signed
agreement -
Adams Pump Station 19661 Chesapeake Verifying 50 Plant 2 (Verifying
Lane Discharge Points.
Banning Pump Station 2201 Malibu Lane Verifying 263
Atlanta Pump Station 8151 Atlanta Avenue Verifying 110
Flounder Pump Station 9731 Flounder Drive erifvInq 30
Indianapolis Pump Station 9221 Indianapolis Verifying 30
Yorktown Pump Station 9211 Yorktown Avenue Verifying 40
Meredith Pump Station 20192 Mainland Lane Verifying 40
Hamilton Station 10101 Hamilton Avenue Verifying - 70
Newland Pump Station 18612 Hamilton Street lVerifying 1 128
City of Newport-Beach(No permit has'beeh issued yet);Flows are subject to change based upon signed
agreement.
Newport Dunes (Online Newport Back Bay Drive 36 21 Coast HWY
DuringWinter Trunk
IRWD. Permit Issued
Los Trancos CPCH across Crystal 200 200 Crystal Cove
ove Pump Station
Muddy Canyon PCH across Crystal 200 200 Crystal Cove
Cove Pump Station
County of Orange(Agreement authorized 1.4MGD total flows from all diversions)-Permit has notbeem issued
Huntington Beach Adams Avenue 1300 972 (Cumulative for all OCSD 24"VCP
County Dischargers) sewerline on
Adams Avenue
Greenville-Banning 2500 Feet Downstream '2 Pumps, 500 each OCSD 94"Q
Channel from Adams Avenue Brookhurst Street
Santa Ana River Channel Within OCSD '2 Pumps, 500 each OCSD 84" RCP
Sunflower Trunk
Talbert Channel Yorktown Avenue '2 Pumps, 300 each OCSD 72"Q
Magnolia
'Second Pump is a Backup
Flow subject to change (An Agreement has not been finalized with City of HBand NB)
"v
Attachment B
Prepared for
South Australia Water Corporation
Survey of Immersed Membrane Bioreactor
Technology
For the Victor Harbour Wastewater Treatment Plant
Final
August2001 Reference: 110254
SouN Australia Water Corporation
Survey M Immersed Membrane Bb acWr Tachnalm
For the V1 or Hn r Wastewater TmaM MPWrA CH2MHILL
Table la—IMB Comparison
Capacity Flux
Location Application Plant Style Status (nWday) (Ilmr/h) SRT Cost'
Ave Peak Ave Peak (days) (Slmr)
Cohasset.USA Coastal discharge Retrofit&upgrade Commissioned 1090 2160 15.3 30.6 A00 9.259
June 2000
Porlock,UK Coastal discharge New plant Commissioned 660 1900 13 34 50 16.666
February 1998
Swanage,UK Costal discharge New plant Commissioned 4800 13000 10 27 s0 9,800
June 2000
Powell River,Canada Coastal discharge Retrofit Commissioned June 1998 5,350 7.000 18.9 24.9 30 1.471
Port McNicol,Canada Coastal discharge New Plant Under Comhuction 1100 LOW ND ND ND 7,045
American Canyon, Brackish water discharge New plant Under ConanVeilon 9.450 13.000 24.3 35.2 30 2.443
USA &reuse
Creemore.Canada Surface discharge with P New plant Under Construction 1400 . 2900 16 27 25 3.214
removal
Milton,Canada Surface discharge with P Stand alone expansion Commissioned 1000 2000 14.8 29.5 15 2.250
removal June 1997
Arapahoe.USA Surface discharge with P Retrofit Commissioned 4.530 6.800 22.4 32 20 962
removal August 1998
Anthem.USA Urban reuse New plant Commissioned 945 2835 24.5 39.7 30 2,632
January 1999
Autaat 2001 Ref 1102 8
South AustralW WaW Comora0on
FmaWastnae tm�mam'0Yor ft Victor Mtrstewattei CH2MHILL
Capacity Flux
Location Application Plant Style Status (ms/day) (L/mr/h) SRT Cost,
Ave Peak Ave Peak (days) ($/ma)
Lehigh Acres,USA Urban reuse Retrofit expansion Commissioned 1900 2,900 30 45 15 ND
May 1999
Colts Neck.USA Urban reuse New plant Commissioned 15
Mid I986 NA 10.7 NA 200+ 20,800
Laguna County,USA Reclamation with salinity Retrofit expansion Design 1890 1890 35 35 TBD 946
control
Key Colony.USA Reclamation with salinity Retrofit rehabilitation Commissioned 1300 3200 18 45 90 4195
control July 1999
Dry weather runo
Santa Monica,USA runoff 1890
Plant In commissioning 1890 2935 43 64 NA 9140
treatment
Nato.
1. Capital cost for the rompiee project k epresud as Australian dollars pa'cuhk metr,Mated perday'heard on current avenge Bow.
2. NA-Nacapplicahle
3. ND-Not ditched by owners mpr ntedw
4. TBD-To bedet"Ined during start-up
5. it must be meted that flux k a function ol0uki Wcasity,hence Is temperature dependent. Warrmu climates therefore heo0t Bom higher dalgn flux rates ffetw namhmnes for a gim
Bow)
August 2001 Rah.1102M 9
South Austmtia Waler Comomtion
Survey of Immerses Membrane Sioreactor Technology
For the vd«FmbourWost w tsrTreaunentPlant CH2MHILL
Table I - IMB Comparison
MLSS HRT at B/Wash B/Wash Chemical Effluent Quality
Location (mgA') peak Interval Duration Clean (mg/L)
Interval
Design Actual (hrs) (mins) (sec) (weeks) TSS BOD NH4 NO. I TP
Cohasset,USA 10-15.000 12,000 3.5 60 60 TBD l 2 - - -
Porlock.UK 12-18.000 12-18.000 5.5 Not used Not used 26 <I 44 - -
Swanage,UK 12-18,000 12-18.000 3 Not used Not used 26 <5 <10 0.6 - 3
Powell River,Canada 16,000 10,000 3.5 10 35 3 <I <5 - - -
PortMcNicol.Cenada 14-15.000 TBD 2.6 1S 30 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TED
American Canyon, 10.000 TBD 5.3 15 30 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Creemore.Canada 10-15.000 12,000 3 IS 60 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Milton.Canada 15-20.000 15,000 1.5 IS 30 52 for ex-sltul 0,95 <2.2 <0.84 <0.07
Arapahoe.USA 15.000 13-15.000 3 15 30 6 3 3.2 0.5 4.4 0.06
Anthem,USA 10.000 10.000 3.5 15 30 >52 for ex-situ] <1 <2 - 10
Lehigh Acres.USA 15.000 13.000 4.6 10-15 10-15 16 0.54 <2 0.05 4.4 1.15
Colts Neck,USA 16-I8.000 16-18AW 33 IS 90 TBD <5 <5 -
Laguna County,USA 10-15.000 10.15,000 2.6 15 30 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Key Colony.USA 13-15.000 13-15.000 5 9 30 I6 for ex-a1tut 1.7 2.2 0.5 1.3 -
Santa Monica,USA N/A N/A N/A 20 30 TBD <5 -
1. In-situ chemkal dean(slow hackpulse. i hour)performed 3 0rnesper week
Au9ua12001 Rat.110Ad1 10
Attachment C
PAC2 FEEDBACK FORM
NAME:
GROUP REPRESENTING:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
QUESTION:
Please fax to Jim Burror at 714-593-7859.
CO�TQ� TGS abg «t
r E.,
BOARD' OFfTPs1VISORS
COVERNK MCENT6iS~ .` , 2oN �::" '.>.,/ CALn=OR 93M
JON RACMW 559-SBD2211ECr"U FAX 559-585.59n CHAIR
touauruvw.LLwn.0 \f `�-,.-�/ TOWOLN
TONYu BMBrunlnrc �`��r •l '�• .". �� xonxiomucoar.m
VICE-CHAIR
ALENE TAY R IOENEVES
x.1xlOW.DIRv S1RAliOWIFl1OMEY6.1
ROSE RT
CIFIS OiIf@BDMO
January 14,2002
Orange County Sanitation District
Attention: Blake P.Anderson,
General Manager
P.O.Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 927284127
Re.,Decision and Findings
Dear Mr.Anderson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Decision and Findings in the Matter of Application of Orange
County Sanitation District for an Eight-Year Extension Beyond the Two-Year Limitation
Set Forth in Section 14B-3 of Kings County Ordinance No. 592.
S4— eiFl y,
Susan M.Hindman
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: Larry Spikes,CAO
Stephen D.Schuett,Kern County Asst.County Counsel
Denis Eymil,Kings County Counsel
1
2
3
4
5
6 BEFORE THE KINGS COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
7
8 In the Matter of Application of the ) APPEAL NO. 01-01
Orange County Sanitation District for )
9 An Eight-Year Extension beyond the )
Two-Year Class B Biosolids Limitation ) WRITTEN DECISION AND FINDINGS
10 Set Forth in Section 148-3 of Kings )
County Ordinance No. 592 )
11 )
Applicant. )
12 1
13
14 This matter came before this Board for hearing on December 18, 2001. The
15 appellant, Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") was represented by Thomas L.
16 Woodruff, Esq; the Kings County Administrative Officer Larry Spikes was represented by
17 Peter D. Moock, Assistant County Counsel. Each side having submitted written briefs
18 and such documentary and oral evidence and argument as they deemed appropriate,
19 the matter was submitted to the Board for consideration.
20 During the hearing OCSD requested that all materials in the administrative record
21 relating to adoption of Ordinance No. 592 and all other Kings County file materials
22 relating to Ordinance No. 592 be entered into the record of this appeal. This request is
23 denied in that the proceedings prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 592, which
24 enacted Chapter 14B of the Kings County Ordinance Code, are not relevant to the
25 issues raised by this appeal.
26 In reaching its determination on the appeal of OCSD, this Board makes the
27 following findings:
28 1
Title: WRITTEN DECISION AND FINDINGS
1 1. OCSD is a "person" under Chapter 14B, and as an owner of property
2 affected by the application of Chapter 14B has standing to bring this appeal.
3 2. The authorization from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control
4 Board to land apply sewage sludge to the property owned by OCSD does not come
5 within the classification of "permanent improvements related to the land application of
6 Sewage Sludge" as required by Section 148-23 of the Ordinance Code.
7 3. The application of Chapter 14B of the Ordinance Code to the property
8 owned by OCSO will not prevent the continued use of the property for its highest and
9 best use for agricultural production.
10 4. The application of Chapter 14B of the Ordinance Code to the property
11 owned by OCSD will not prevent the continued application of Class A or Exceptional
12 Quality Sewage Sludge as permitted by the authorization from the Central Valley
13 Regional Water Quality Control Board to land apply sewage sludge to the property
14 owned by OCSD.
15 5. OCSD has failed to identify any other permanent improvements that have
16 been installed or constructed on its property related to the land application of sewage
17 sludge. OCSD has identified that other permanent improvements have been made to
18 the property, but has failed to establish the value of the improvements or to establish
19 that the improvements cannot be used, and therefore the costs not amortized, beyond
20 the date for the phase out of Class B Sewage Sludge or Class A Sewage Sludge.
21 THEREFORE, this Board denies the appeal of the Orange County Sanitation
22 District for an extension of time to apply Class B Sewage Sludge to its property.
23
24 Dated: January 8, 2002
anrrYann rba
25 a
Kings County Board of Supervisors
26 SDS:wl
#73836
27
28 2
Title: WRITTEN DECISION AND FINDINGS
Regulatory Bulletin
=T California Association of Sanitation Agencies
Volume 11,Number 1 January 2002
REVISED WATER QUALITY • Seiner Spill Reporting.. The policy would require
ENFORCEMENT POLICY TO TARGET reporting of all sewer spills, regardless of volume,
"PRIORITY"VIOLATIONS final destination, whether the spills reached sur-
face waters or whether the spill was completely
At its meeting later this month, the State Water Re- contained. This approach is far broader than ex-
sources Control Board (SWRCB) will consider adop- isting statutory and regulatory reporting require-
tion of a revised Water Quality Enforcement Policy. meras. CASA maintains that the Enforcement Policy
The policy,which has been in development for over a is not the appropriate mechanism to establish new
year, is intended to guide the regional water quality sanitary sewer overflow reporting requirements.
control boards in exercising their enforcement author- Including these sweeping reporting provisions in
ity. The stated goal of the policy is "fair, firm and the Policy is in essence a "back door" attempt to
consistent" enforcement actions. impose an "all-spills" reporting requirement with.
In January of 2001, CASA and Tri-TAC submitted de- out going through a general permit process. CASA
raged comments on an earlier daft of the polity,mis- has urged the SWRCB to pursue any revisions to
ing a number of significant issues. The revised policy reporting requirements through the appropriate
responds to many of the POTW comments, and is regulatory and legislative processes.
greatly improved in terms of its clarity and internal The SWRCB held a public hearing on the proposed
consistency. The revised draft reflects an emphasis on revised policy on January 10,2002:As of this writing,
compliance assurance rather than "bean counting" of it is unknown what changes, if any, the SWRCB will.
violations. However, the revised policy also contains make to the policy prior to adoption.
new provisions that are of significant concern to CASA
and Tri-TAC, and that were highlighted in comments ORANGE COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
submitted to the SWRCB in December. The major re- GENERAL PERMIT MAY SET PRECEDENT
training issues are:
Continuing concern regarding beach closures has
• Calculation ofEconomic Benefit. The Water Code prompted the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Con-
requires that the amount of a discretionary admin-_ trot Board to propose general Waste Discharge Require-
isttative civil liability assessed by a regional board ments(WDRs)for collection system entities in Orange
most recover,at a minimum,the economic benefit County. The draft WDRs would prohibit sanitary sewer
to the,violator. Under the proposed policy, eco- overflows (SSOs), pursuant to a Basin Plan provision
nomic benefit would be calculated by determining barring the discharge of untreated sewage to"any sur-
whether there are any actions that a discharger - face water stream,natural or man-made,or to my twin.
"could have taken"to prevent the violation. CASA age system intended to convey storm water runoff to
argued that this definition is overly broad;if a treat- surface water streams." The WDRs would also require
mew technology exists that could have prevented each collection system operator to prepare a Sewer
the violation—for example, reverse osmosis or System Management Plan(SSMP), which is very simi-
microfdtration—the economic benefit would be the ]at to the Capacity,Management,Operation and Main-
millions of dollars the POTW"saved"by not imple- tenance (CMOM) requirement contained in the daft
menting this treatment. CASA has urged the SWRCB federal SSO regulations.
to revise the policy to clarify that the regional board
should consider only those improvements that The Santa Ana proposed general WDRs are the most
should reasonably have been installed,taking into comprehensive approach to date to addressing 550s
account economic considerations and environmen- from satellite collection systerns. Given that the WDRs
tal impacts. will likely set a precedent that will he followed by
Volume 11,Number 1 2 January 20M
other regional boards or even the SWRCB, Tri-TAC tion in California's environment resulting from disposal
submitted comments to the Santa Ana Regional Board of mercury-containing wastes that are not currently
regarding the proposal. Tri-TAC noted its support for regulated as hazardous waste. Tri-TAC also endorsed
the general permit approach to address satellite col- pollution prevention, recycling, and promotion of the
lection systems, and highlighted the following aspects use of mercury almmatives as methods to provide ad-
of the WDRs as drafted: ditional environmental and public health safeguard
from the discharge of mercury. CASA was a co-spon-
• The draft WDRs are based on the premise that sari- sor of SE 633 (Sher), signed into law last year, which
tary sewer collection systems can be constructed bans the sale and use of mercury-containing fever ther-
and operated in such a manner as to prevent all mometers and novelty items and restricts use of mer-
overflows. Tri-TAC noted that this premise is cury in K-12 schools.
flawed, as even the most optimally operated and
maintained systems can and will experience un- The DTSC report discusses the health and envim men-
avoidable SSOs. Tri-TAC argued that the prohibi- tal problems posed by mercury,and identifies five regu-
tion on SSOs should be deleted and that the Board latory options:
should focus on the SSMFs as the vehicle for pre-
venting overflows. 1. Regulate all mercury-containing waste as a hazard-
ous waste (identified as the preferred alternative.)
• Tri-TAC supported the approach to satellite sys-
tems contained in the WDRs, wherein the pub- 2. Regulate all waste with intentionally added mer-
liclyowned treatment works (POTWs) currently cury as hazardous waste
holding the NPDES permit is not a principle per- 3. Regulate all mercury-containing consumer products
mittee responsible for the SSOs of the indepen- when they are discarded as hazardous waste
dent satellites. Rather, under the proposed per-
mit, each satellite entity is named in the WDRs 4. Develop a new hazardous waste regulatory thresh-
and has its own compliance and reporting respon- old number
sibility.
5:"Status quo
• Tri-TAC noted that additional clarity regarding the
exercise of enforcement discretion is needed. For Tri-TAC expressed concern about the broad sweep of
example, many SSOs are completely contained in Option 1. Class I hazardous waste landfill capacity
streets or channels and returned to the sewer. would be tremendously burdened at an unwarranted
These spills have no public health or envimnmen- cost if DTSC regulates all mercury-containing waste,
tal impacts and should not be subject to enforce- including blosolids, manure, municipal solid waste,
ment action. green wastes,and so on. as hazardous waste. Instead,
Tri-TAC endorsed Options 3 and 4. Option 4 would
The Santa Ana Regional Board will hold a workshop require the development of a new hazardous waste
on the draft WDRs in late January, and the Board will regulatory threshold number,based on current sound
consider adoption of the proposal in March or April. science. Option 3, the regulation of all mercury-con-
taining consumer products when they are discarded as
hazardous waste,would address products to which mer-
PROMFCS CONCERN REGARDING cury was intentionally added. Option 3 is the right
RIOSOLIDS LAND APPWCATION approach for many products where mercury testing is
In October, 2001, the State Department of Toxic Sub- difficult or unnecessary(due to high mercury contend.
stances Control(DTSC)issued a draft Mercury Report, Thy products should be "listed" hazardous wastes
outlining alternative approaches to reducing mercury when discarded.
pollution. Tri-TAC prepared written comments on the DISC is re-evaluating its Mercury Report in light of the
draft report, and provided testimony at a public work- comments received. Department representatives have
shop regarding the potential impact of the preferred indicated that is not their intent to preclude bmolids
alternatives on the land application of bisolids in Cali- land application and that approaches other than Op-
fomia. Tri-TAC indicated that POTWS share DTSC's tion 1 are currently being explored.
concern regarding the problem of mercury contamina-
Volumg4l,Number 1 3 January 2002
POTW ANNUAL MEETING ing for adoption of a policy that implements the rec-
WPPH AIR REGULATORS WILL FOCUS ommendations of the National Academy of Sciences in
ON DIESEL ENGINES its 2001 review of the TMDL program. Specifically,
The annual meting between POTWs and staff a[ the CASA advocates that California's Listing and De-Listing
Policy must:
California Air Resources Board(CARE) will be sched-
uled for April of 2002. The meeting was pushed back • Employ a "two-dered" listing methodology. The
from the usual January/February time frame to allow SWRCB should develop a"planning list"and a•veri-
time to gather and evaluate the results of the Tri-TAC Ned list." The verified list would consist of those
diesel engine survey. The Tri-TAC Air Committee has waters where there is sufficient data to demon-
distributed the survey to water and sewer agencies strate that water quality standards are not being
throughout the state in order to gather data regarding attained. TMDLs would be developed for the we-
the impact of anticipated new requirements that CARE tern on the verified list. The planning list would
Is drafting. Completed survey forms are due to the Tri- be used to track waters where additional investi-
TAC Air Committee by February 4, 2002. gation,monitoring or assessment is needed in or-
der to determine whether an impairment exists.
In October, 2000, CARE adopted a Diesel Risk Reduc- The planning list should not be used for any regu-
tion Plan aimed at reducing emissions from diesel en- [story purpose and should be submitted to USEPA
gins. According to CARE,70%of statewide risk from for information only.
air toxics comes from diesel exhaust. The plan lays
the groundwork for new requirements on stationary • Specify the minimum data standards required to
engines, portable engines, and on-road and off-road list and de-list waters.
mobile engines. The cost to POTWs to retrofit or re-
place diesel engines with lower emission engines is • Require listing only those waters Impaired by dis-
expected to be significant. For example,the estimated charges of pollutants from point and nonpolm
retrofit cost for a 108 bhp portable pump would be sources, not those that do not meet water quality
$5,400; the cost to retrofit a stationary 1337 bhp gen- criteria solely due to natural conditions or physi-
erator would be approximately $167,000. Given the cal alterations.
widespread impact of the new diesel controls,Tri-TAC . identify, for each listing, (a)the numeric or narra-
has decided to focus on this key issue in its annual Live water quality standard exceeded and the source
meeting with the air regulators. of the water quality standard(e.g.California Toxim
SWRCB BEGINS WORK ON 303(d) Rule, Basin Plan, etc.); (b) the specific data used
LISnNG POLICY; 2002 LIST WILL BE - to conclude the water is Impaired;and(c)the meth-
COMPILED WITH NO FORMAL GUIDELINES odology used to determine that the water quality
standard was exceeded.
SWRCB staff has begun its review of the revised 303(d)
lists submitted by the regional boards. Under regula- In support of our efforts to ensure a workable 303(d)
bons adopted last fall, the states have until October, Listing Policy that meets the requirements of the Clean
2002 to submit their 2002 lists of impaired waters to Water Act,CASA is reviewing listing regulations adopted
the United States Environmental Protection Agency by other states, including Florida and Arizona,as well
(USEPA)for approval. The SWRCB has Indicated that as the federal Consolidated Assessment and Listing
it intends to take a more "active" role in reviewing Methodology(CALM)under development by USEPA.
regional board listings than it has in pas[years. TRI-TAC CHALLENGES USEPA S COST
In the meantime, SWRCB staff have begun work on a ESTIMATES FOR THE TMDL PROGRAM
formal policy to govern 303(d) listing and de-listing
In conjunction with the VA/HUD/Independent Agen-
decisions in future listing cycles. Members of the AB ties spending bill, Congress directed USEPA to con-
982Public Advisory Group arc meeting with key duct:"comprehensive assessment"of the national costs
SWRCB staff to Identify elements they consider essea- of developing and implementing the total maximum
tial to a valid and workable listing polity. CASA is daily loads(TMDL)program. USEPA released its draft
actively involved in these discussions, and along with
other representatives of the Regulated Caucus,is argu- cost estimates last summer and requested comment by
December 7, 2001. Td-TAC submitted detailed com-
Volume 11,Number 1 4 January 2002
ments to support its view that the USEPA report is not
comprehensive and does not present the complete
package of information requested by Congress. CASA STAFF:
Tri-TAC noted that a "comprehensive assessment* of Michael E Dillon
TMDL program costs should include an assessment of Executive Director and Lobbyist
all of the following categories of costs: (1) Ambient
water and pollutant source monitoring, (2) Section Roberta L. Larson
Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs
303(d)listing,(3)TMDL development,(4)TMDL imple-
mentation, and (5) TMDL follow-up. The USEPA re- Eric Sapirstein
port does not present cost estimates for 303(d) listing Federal Legislative Advocate
or TMDL follow-up activities(e.g.,monitoring,permit- Christina Dillon
ting, legal actions, TMDL modification), and costs for Lobbyist
other program activities are significantly underestimated. Debbie Welch
The letter cautioned that that decision-makers will de- Conference Coordinator
rive misperceptions from the results presented in the Valerie Darby
USEPA report,and expressed concern that TMDL imple- Legislative Clerk
mention costs will be bome almost entirely by local
public agencies and private citizerss. Tri-TAC recom-
mended that USEPA significantly revise the report to
portray a more realistic view of typical and potential TECHNICAL ISSUE CHAIRS:
high-end costs of the TMDL program.
Alexander R. Coate
Cbair,Air Issues Forum
Bast Bay Municipal Utility District
Ed McCormick
Cbair, Land Issues Forum
_ Bast Bay Municipal Utility District
James Kelly
Cbair, Waterlssues Forum
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
California Association of Sanitation Agencies FirabClas6 Mail
925 L Street,Suite 1400 U.S.Postage
Sacramento, California 95814 PAID
Permit 2550
Sacramento,CA
$aksea 1.7-rf tk
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,IRVINE
BERKELEV•OAVIS-IRVINE-LOS ANOBLES•MERCED-RIVERSIDE•SAN OIE00•SAN PEAK C19C0 R i SANTA BARIIARA•SANTACRUZ
r
The Henry Samueli School of Engineering Irvine,CA 92697-2175
Department of Civil&Environmental Engineering (949)824-5333
(949)824-2117
January 22, 2002
Mr. Blake Anderson, General Manager
O.C. Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92778
Dear Mr.Anderson:
I would like to thank you and the O.C. Sanitation District for joining the Civil and Environmental
Engineering Affiliates at the Public Agency level and for your generous contribution of$500.00.
Support from our friends is deeply appreciated, as it helps provide us with the funding necessary
to assure the highest quality educational and research environment for our students and faculty.
I am most grateful for your commitment to the Department and to its outstanding students and
programs. As we strive to build one of the finest Departments in the country, I hope that we can
count on your continued support.
The CEE Affiliate Steering Committee meets the second Wednesday of every month from 7:30—
9:00 a.m. and we welcome your participation. The next meeting will be Wednesday, Febmary
13, 2002 in the CEE Conference Room located in the Engineering Gateway Building, CEE Suite
on the fourth floor. Current projects include planning the Winter and Spring Quarterly Meetings
(March 15, 2002 at the University Club—"Infrastructure—Reliability and Security and May 17,
2002 at the Beckman Center—"Southern California Infrastructure Report Card"), Student
Mentor Program,and Department Development. We hope you can join us.
Sincerely yours,
'a .
Scherfi 1
ofessor and Vice Chair
�dRD e_E.TT2rr'� .
CONTROVERSIAL COMPOSTING PLANT waste plant 3
A proposed composling plant In Calton would process 1,7gg tons of "-' m
bbsollds tlelly Irom the Inland Empire end Orenye County. II done I l r • m
correcti ,the plant should produce no odor,officials Said.Odors will tv I 0
be contryoAetl through the use of hlohlters proven to reduce odor, �y .. ' J causes stink 0
signlAcantiy. Bloflltretlon Is the use of micro-organisms to remove
and oxidize compounds. s • J
Aeration°bnorwelmostl°ompost plinn ,Pa,; .._ in Colton W
p ... r
aam I " I 'b&'""'f" ■ Indoor composting plant would
prooeas 1,700 tons of sewage
blosollds dally, 300 tons of that from y
Orange County. y
a s
By EMILY SACKS
m
Ma attn Mr 11 aCa1 An Orange Cow sanitation agency is read A U
I lav° a B y 6 Y Y
a uan awenoo y/j;•+a, tit' to built i C the to collier cost of a plant t- a
M' fN exearr he built d Colton to convert wastewater treat-
lisp o
HA. by ntaP ??r!4sM man solids, restaurant waste and r landscapers
bio-
5a to
construct
a com,aaepl or reJect memnas. degradable waste into PoM1ilizer for landscapers 0
■Construct a composting recipe Wing bad stocks 6biosdids,green waste, and gardeners. 0
wood materiel)an adjus for carbon/narogen ratio. Lik densty and moisture. The battle to keep another wunty's wastes
■ForBle 2 recipe and piece within the i through system. from being trucked to Colton has already started. +•Forgo tled f negative air will peas moisture,
the pax and will b Y
is After
20 days,
for lampamle mure end moisture. Anonymous cam sent were
Grand ins our mining
process f rays,it will have met re uiremenl lur dents in mid-December were omitmus, wdmiig
process for lusher reduction of pelRogens. / 1 of a vile stench that would arise from sewage21
■Could be shipped as a finished product as - h am
processing or other compost,or pN thmugn ludner /pat waste dumped near the city. u
processing for other uses _ Home values would plummet, the fliers
.a t ft t, f warned, and the hard-fmlghl pmposed high
3
school
„ hool would be run out of the area.
blab.pw � ' 9 ' '�'� Those backing the indoor composting plant in y
i south Colton disagree
r i The operation under review by the city would N
r j 7 ldlnp°atlnH
L .Yal.m nun heated sewage residue into hig
h-quality far-
"It's lih
misinformation," said rim Bulliven, ro
e c ti[- G uQ owner of Inland Composting and Organic Racy.
cling in Calton. 1 fat that once people under-
?j0 d'p �°0 o�P.Ap V stand,they'll have a different faling about it"
nb SR o o M Sullivan's proposal was officially tamed in to
l a . gp•
m^el the city of Colton lest wok.
It could take months for an rnvironmenml re-
view to be completed before the application is
considered by the Planning Commission,said AI ro
Holliman,assistant city manager.
Meanwhile, Cotton, Orange County m
510 oraphic by CHHIS MARCH See WASTEIAS
Waste
p m� The indoor process ollowa d- "My pmjm does not anal 'Ter sans to me to be A better ie Colton, sold spokeswoman no Colors City Council Also
r��■/ emen6 N be mnnalI enebli4 the achoal, and the aclxrol dots lomtion, 6rther away hate our EI®begt Opaio . has lidded sane tmvplain6 v
Sullivan to speed up namml do- not have any effect on my Dml• neighborhood father from A If it Is approved by the dry, ficen neighbor. Maya Dated.
attnpning ofthe wasw brought ec4"he said proposed shoal. ...It seema m Sullivan4 his will be the first Hemet said.Sullivan has heard 2
Datlnued from At there. Sullivan plans In surround Ids me ro make a lot of sense," be fully indoor processing built in from them AM said each firm the
Sanitation District officials And Some of the resulting am- I"20owiU alaweandtreesm said California. cancems wee addermed, m
the eonpaxami;that plan A series post will be returned W(hinge shield it From view, although it California has few choices About 5,000 tons of Raalids lust As the Mom would be no
of public mecgngs stating As County fa us in hinedmping. will bA open to the public for when it comes disposing of row- are caned daily in the greeter limited at We new Inalian, Ie O
mty As February to combat con- Much of the remaining twmpmt compeer ales end educational eke bypmducs. landfill diver, I.n Angeles area O
ems. would be cold to famlirer tees- programs He plans to build A stet requirements mandate the said imits& T would be eves N
c1assroom at the site. with the population he Alan more limited The site h ns
The Orange roposin Boris pa'If r AT1111 oft lest 5o pedant of c rim by millione she slate bared by a Peking desk utm�,ea `I
Lion he Pict s which
rug to tax,
"If this innmmsmty was mom As for job.
myou "If we're mammals that can be mined. could end g m the come jam wider Amounts facility AM a
for the plan4 which woWd pm forward-Thinking, they'd rmliro able doing amr corN neat rootsm building simuld e Dumping biawlit6 in the that the ongoing energy crisis necking Sim ..
two 1,700 Tom of"Age biosd- they're whore Orange County ocean is no longer allowed mod it hm umed,Osmich mid .p
lids daily,3D0 tons of that from was 15 ymra ego...In M year, and have no Mot."Sullivan aid, would be rnpoatble to get per, "We're going to end up with Ultimately,Sullivan, a sties =
Orange County. Than won't be any mom for '17ut hwan't slopped the oppo- mite to bum drum. Mot chin the populmon growth end m ofBloaningma aid he woasm
The remaining waste would This." Sullivan aid. "This will tents from raising a stink. transport the mannent wane to way he handle the Activity,-de be agood neighbor and wards
come flnm the Inland Empire, enure the growth and preseetion After the monymous giant Other Arms, en option that is laid find a way for the project to be
were received in Csrand Terim, QORIY and poses wear An made acisvied. _
SulHehaid' o(tThe cud Empire" The fining of Sullivan's limited
v
He h to eta vat the Orange Coucryabout
t 15a its That ch h treating the net end them me end limited "I'm not a giant oarpaadpa
� 6 PPro by The wrtcnt site is next ro Dfenict received about IS ells ni eatcM1 birsolids so th � r
June m sat you,-.1d iOu and their hills that Sullivan mid is tlOS %' land available to a has County I'm a camamM Individual will
move his I om aeon outdoor he p uposed location of a Nme oho ,mid flvm wvried evil an be tiro c egriein in Smakestearn molten me has option, of envimamenteliy beve(del W
green waste m bn balsas dents,aid district environmental whether dwugh comporting a Stearns said. burin An -a the g high school in the Colson Joint ea;"he aid m
oe Rey Steel in the Agoa Mee Unified Scheel Ohtric6 specWe an aware
Sterns. additive.Are Are bad or California's
's acidic Sullivan bee a renewable Bennett aid Abu worms the A
As lndusttal Rerysling Zone Tor proposed site for the comeoed ands we that people
pin ad- soils and directlylao applying blase- compom ack oed with i which Wars,ves city to be viewed m a good m
The city approved the pm- eompeAting plant is About ore dress time aresms for " lids to farmlan is n g comporting site, which serves neighbaaswell.
posed project in 19"os 72 saes mile npthwal in a recessed arm ' sty - Noes fran Yunipa ro Devote
t wtdow cam nA. A:tries sic said. Jared AM Fontana mparts of Riverside '7 believe that ea a city it's W
on the teth side of the Senor
of lawstm a led t p jam, The disme's board will con- Until now, composting in County. oa obligation m let thA public N
but courts olgrtomly fount in Ana Ibver. eider the project et its Feb.27 Culif Ana has been done outside, The South Coast Air Quality have ao opportunity he hour O
Sullivan's favor,he said School district officials would meeting Missing ammonia odor into the Manegamet Dimict has so- what's going act"ahe aid"Ibb
His proposel befoe Ile city not ODn irm if the location is As' Ornd Terrace Meyer Den air. gymgro in Riverside wss m poly one camplum fran is theircotmnuniy and they have
sska for An addilionel 23 ecrca der negotiation far a school end tluchemn avid he Ice mom wars- toed H nnphbodng sidms a miehbor about radon. Sulk- a My over WIM'e going in scar
on which a stas-of--Mean rr- whether the NNre composing red about his raiders being over the adorrtpmduced. rrr son trot tired Reuse Mdrlame."
door compose would be built. epeation would affect IL dragged into a amour pmpaign 5ynagro is now working an the odor did met extend beyond certain wtter amry Sachs at
The building would he the sin Sullivan said neither project is Den the project's impact An his building an Indoor composting his property lice, raid dinner (on) amoae in vie amea At
of3%football fields. impacted city, plant similar to the one proposed spokeswoman Lithe Smith ,m,ny.wehe6abwn...
1.
'p
m
Jan-21-02 03: 15P USC SPPO Sacramento Ctr- 915 444 7712 P_02
9
CALIFORNIA
N e nFBU1LM8nle11
COalI A
�w.d dun••nl.. N, ••u:..�u.a...Flnav
wa +•nn I?mn I va n„�..LI,,., . :•u.edu
I \ no . {ni.m..�lu �.•,. n.l
Inimmy 21,2002
The Honorable John Burton
California State Senate
State Capitol,Room 205
Sacramento,CA 95814
Ile:Investing in California Infrastructure
Dear Senator Burton.
on behalf of the California Rebuild America Coalition(CaIRAC),a non-profit,broad-based organization
working to build support for dedicated and Consistent sourer of funding su(ficicm to sustain Califomiis
vital iufiattmclure facilities and systems, I wish to Commend you for your leadership in the wake of the
events of September 1 Ii°and respectfully ruluat your sound leadership in seeking Continued investment in
California's infrastructure,
investment in public infrastructure-roads,bridges,mass transit,drinking water and wulewater systems.
airports,parks,schools and universities,ports and energy-is a proven economic stimulus. It creates a
sigrdficrit number of jobs and generates munediatc and sustained economic growth m Communities
throughout the state. For every S I billion invested in inimLiructurc tens of thousands of jobs arc generated.
Moreover,these investments yield significant short-term as well as long-term benefits in the form of
improved efdoncics,security,safety and reliability.
As you may knmv,them is an enormous backlog of infrastructure needs in our state. Decades old public
faciities and systems are aging and need repair,and more building is vital to meet the demands of a
growing population. California's need for new Capital investments in public works adds up to billions of
dollars. A report published by the Califomin Business Roundtable estimated California's ten-year Capital
facilities need at mom;than$90 billion,about$10 billion more than reported by the Department of Finance
in 1997.
Given the enmmous infrastmeture needs facing Our state,and the inability of the state to satisfy every one
of those needs under even the most optimistic of circenhstslmes,it is essemial that the state's financing
efforts be directed to the highest priority rtcods. Policymakers need to undertake a comprehensive review of
California's Capital facilities needs,establish a clear set of priorities and adopt at ongoing annual plan for
financing those priorities.
The members of CalRAC am pleased to hear that Guvcmur Davis'budget proposes$67g million dollars in
lease revenue bonds to accelerate new public works projects that are ready to go. Though important,one-
time espoedituns aren't enough to achieve mfra_ttructum facilities and systems capable of meeting
California's current and future needs. It is critical that California rnakc maximum use of surplus-a-venuc
cycles to invest in its physical infrastructure. lust as it took years of neglect to creak;our Cared
infrai tructam crisis,it will take many years of ueady coninutme t and long-term vision to repair the
damage and rebuild our state.
over-
Jan-21-02 03: 15P USC SPPD Sacramento Ctr. 916 444 7712 P.03
P
Investing in California Infrastructure
Page 2
California's physical infraswcture facilities and systems are public assets,intricately tied to quality of life
and economic vitality. As you enter this legislative session and consider measures to address our current
economic slowdown and budget deficit,we urge you to consider increased investments in our state's public
infrastructure.Please do not hesimte to contact our office with any questions you may have. We appreciate
your it=and consideration,and look forward to working with you and your staff as we continue to address
our slate's growing infrastructure needs.
sincerely,
Michael Bowmen
Director of Public Affairs
Southern
a
_ 1y SIERRA
CLUB
Published by the Angela Chapter of the Sicria aub.ServiagGis Angeles and Orange Counties
Vol. 58 No, 2 Eebmary 2002
OC activist never wavers in his
fight against sewageig
Jan Vandersloot and legally dumps m nimally Tmd he ha gone. she attention of local
se wage mto theownoBofHunong- govanmepn and the press, not to
OOG crusade against ton Beach-240 million gallons of it mend.. a citiremy tired of wonder-
the 301(h) waiver aday. ing if thry71 mach more than waves
when diry swim at dmirlocal beaches.
By Paul Arms OOG,OOG,yuck,yuck .
OOG!It rounds Eke the grunting and the 301(h) waiver
of a hairy Neanderthal,but it's really The story behind Orange
the name of a group dedicated to Counry's orator--qquality woes is not a
ending Neanderthal practices of plcasant one. If you have a weak
dumppi.g live sewage into$.nth= stomach or like to swim in the
Cali(orniai wasd wamrs. That's «eon, be forewamed. But it's a
right: into the ocean—your own, story that needs to be told, and one
our ocean. , µ that may still have a happy ending.
OOG stands for Own Outfall iyQ-' Think of the OCSD as a gigantic
Group.Why name your group after va oudaouse. Instead of dropping its
a sewage pipe?Ask Dr.Jan Vander- waste in a hole in the ground,like she
door,one of Orange Countys lead- usual outhouse, it dumps it in the
ing environmental activists and a '* own offshore of Huntington Beach.
Sierra Club member.The physician, t' (One almost spats to sce a assrent
a resident of Newport Beach,is soft- moon painted on the from gate of the
spoken,but he has been relentless in facilities.) The disvict treats sewage
his drive to educate the government from more than 20 cities in central
and the public about the serious - and northwest Orange County, dis-
health and environmental harardt posing of the waste of more than 2.2
posed by Orange Cowry's method - rmsaatu million people from Yorba Unda to
of handing its sewage. Jan and Cheryl Vandersloot Fullerton, Newsom[ Bach to
In the summer of 2000,after high were feted at a dinner parry at Huntington Bach. The pipe that
level of baaerial contamination which Jan received the Silver dumps she sewage in the ocean is
caused a series of beach closures in plunger Award—an apropos gift located four and a half miles off the
Huntington Beach, people started for an activist dedicated to shoreline of Huntington Beach.
snitching their heads.The fact that cleaning up the Orange County From the pipe emanates a large
the affected beaches were near to Sanitation District's act. sewage plume—six miles long, three
where the Orange County Sanitation miles wide and a hundred fee[chick
District (OCSDI dumps sewage Vandenloot and OOG went to It comes near shore in Newport
scored mongovemment offs- ,top the Bow. He u a man on a m;t- ��and Huntington Beach.
seal. Thry though` that
d sewage sion, armed With a silver tongue ... The OCSD 6 able m dump this
was [reared eo acceptable levels. and a silver Plungermot, on that sewage become it has a 301(h)wvvem
Vand<nloot said, "Think again!'He later) Workin wih die Siem Club, The 301(h)waiver is a legal=mp-
and fellow....Joey Bacamo and the Surfrider Foundation, Newport Lion to puts of the 1972 Federal
Doug Korthof had discovered the Beach's Defend the Bay and [he Gan Water Act.This waiver allows
"swop on she poop': the OCSD Namnl Resattrta Defense Cauncil PROP,40/PAGE 10
Waiver/FROM PAGE 1 dinner parry at a Huntington Beachderslo restaurant to honor Jan Vanot
the OCSD to dump large
aountsand his wife, Cheryl. (If you ever
of live Feral bacteria and chemicals _lfi, y.' mat Jan, ask him about the "two
into the oceast. (And we thought :y - meetings a week maximum rule"laid
Sierra Club outings waivers were down by Cheryl.)At[he event there
ridiculous!) While the sewage Bows s s was good food and good company.
into the omn daily, the OCSD r s:= ' Many Onor County activists
board of directors meert once a e t ri were there. Therm Sears, Chris
month. This ggoovverning board cons Koontz, Ala and Carole Minter,
the nmtation d'is, and it indudn r Eileen Murphy,Ninry Donavm and
one city council representative from a Don McGee.Angela Chapter Chair
each municipality in the district. �s' " Gordon LabedS and wife Diana
•I• l s ti Mann,another Chapter activist.were
Waving goodbye to the waiver ` there also. OOG member Joey
"Catch a wave and you're sitting , r Raano had a music gig at the restae-
on top of the wodd;sing the Beach •'?,,,-.`.�.,r sane, and he performed songs.
Boys in the mid-1960s. Well, now :"t':.,"`'�''� (Raano is the creator of the "Surf.
there is something nary in that Swim,Play,Get Hepatitis A"slogan.)
wave. Any`Surfin' Safari"in Orange To honor all of his hard work,
County will require hepatitis short. Vandersloot was given a high-class,
To Fight back, Vandersloot and wutaaas custom-made Silver Plunger. (Okay,
COG arc-taking a cue from rock OOG member Joey Racano it was not a solid silver plunger. It
bands. They're embarking on their serenaded the guests at the was a $2.99 plunger spray-painted
own mad trip: the Great City-to- Party where Jan Vandersloot with a$2 ran ofsil«r ppainr.Orange
City Plunger Tour. As leader of the received his Silver Plunger. County awironmentilins ace fiscal
charge to stop the sewage dumping, conservatives.) Cheryl was given
COG vol meetings g o to individual
du Placentia, suppors the dumping. In moodflowerswu light a).fun.
evening'
countYi fact, this strategy her worked well th
members and convince them to vote for a city like Yorba Linda, which at ace vistsre Vanders[l000 the
against the sewage waiver.And Sierra has been on a building spree.Coun-
Club members an help. cil members can approve develo OOG give vosn to our envimn-
To force the OCSD to stop using meat after de«lopmenc and then men[,our future and our children.
Else 301(h)waiver,all thus needed is come ro the Orange County Sanity- Vandersloot and OOG w81 con-
13 votes against it from the 25 mcm- tion District and yore to dump the ^^ace their tour. Nat up arc [he
tiers of the board of dircnors. The resulting sewage in the ocean. Since cities of Fullerton, Irvine and
purpose of the Great Plunger Tour is the nAy 19GOs,[he OCSD her fol- Orange.IFyou ie a resident of[hose
to line up [hose crucial votes from lowed a short-sighted consolidation 01da,send a It[ma.
to your council-
amongthe chin served b OCSD. man wday. Do OOG a favor...help
Y strategy,dosing inland sewage trot- ct'id of the waiver.
All that's needed is a simple majori- men[ plants and centralizing opera- B
ry, but it will be far from simple to bons on the coast. In effect, this
g«and the risk most be completed allows inland cities to ignore the
by the end of the year. problems crated by urban sprawl a
So far, the cities of Huntington Out of sight,out oFmind.
Bach, Newport Bach, Sal Bach While many Orange County city Is your dry put of the
and Cosa Mesa have voted against governments are trying to ^rBer Orange County Sanitation
renewing the 301(h)waiver.And in about what happens to the stuff District?
November, Irvine City Council they flush down the toilet, The cities of Anaheim,
members had Strongwords against Huntington Brach is trying to fig- Brea, Buena Park, Costa
the waiver,but u of presstime have ure out how to keep in tourist Mesa. Cyppress, Fountain
yet to Sake action on the issue. On industry alive. Enter Debbie Cook. Valley, Fullerton, Garden
February G, Fullerton City Council On December 3, Cook an envi-
will weigh the waiver issue. (See ronmenal Schisms. and a former Grove, Irvine, La Habra, ,
action box for how to get involved.) member of the Angeles Chapter _Palm., Los Alamitos, Orange,
Ic will be'a tough fight Powerful Executive Committee, became Placentia,Santa Ma,Stanton,
West-
business interests will oppose any mayor of Huntington Brach. Cook Tustin, Villa Park, Wes efforts to get rid of the waiver, is not afraid to spok up.One of her minister and Yorba Linda me
D.
benme it will nice costs for sewage floc moves was ro Point" like the ill part a the p o f volunteers
services(even though the cost a Idle- place of Councilman Pert' Green, s cort group of volunt«rs
ly to be only 14 cents a day per the Huntington Beach rep'aenn- her powered the fight against
household).Building industry assod- rive on the OCSD board and a the waiver, but they need
ations have already been quoted in the longtime supporter of the sewage more help.To get involved in
media saying that the 301(h) waiver dumping. He is gone. She is in. stopping the seyng'dumping
Should stay in place.And that inter- What nad Stay coned and getting rid of the 301(h)
an are likely to have a heavy influ- waiver, all or email Angela
ence on many Ciry councils. The story of the Silver Plunger Chapter c^nsemtion cesor-
While some cities are starting to Sometimes Orange County dumnit Martin Schlageter
rally against the waiver,most inland activists will kick off the hiking boors; (213-3874287, at. 204;
cities arc ignoring [he issue. Other put on the flip-flops and just have mds@kxsp.mm).
cities, such as Yorba Linda and fun. Recently some of them honed a
30� csrt�
CALIFORNIA
WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION y 5
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 525, Oakland, CA 94621.1935 p p
Fax (510) 382-7810 a Phone (510) 382.7800 a Website: www.cwea.org
February 4, 2002
Blake Anderson
Orange County SD
PO Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Anderson:
I just wanted to lake a few minutes to let you know how much CWEA appreciates the new
CWEA Publication that the Orange County Sanitation District and its Collection Systems
workers helped to develop.
The CWEA Collection Systems Committee and its supporters have always been an excellent
group of volunteers, who have done a great job for the Association and the wastewater
profession. Not only does it produce quality manuals, but its support of the technical certification
program and conferences is key to the growth of professionalism throughout the wastewater
industry.
I want to thank you for your support of this work, and express my appreciation for allowing your
staff the time and energy to participate in the work of the California Collection System
Collaborative Benchmarking Group's Best Practices Manual:Hydro/lush Cleaning of Small-
Diameter Sewers. It is a great resource for collection systems personnel across California.
Enclosed is a copy of the manual for your use.
Thanks and best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
Ad R o C s
y o CAE
Executive Di for
SAWORO_DOC)Publicagc ICSManwAThankYmLet*Agenrydoc
-tom
A t arv-qE,rL
resources re STATE OF CALIFORNIA
J GJJ CRAY o.eyli, oeverne.
AG E N C Y MARY C. NICHOLS. .eereterY
1416 Ninth Street. Suite 1311
SaiYantenta CA 95614
http://reso RSCSgov
Ph. 916.653.5656
FAX 916.653.6102
January 24,2002
Blake Anderson
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018
Dear Blake:
Thank you for participating in the California Biodiversity Council meeting in
Ontario on January 10 and 11. Your involvement added to the Coma's
understanding of the pressures and challenges facing the Santa Ana River
Watershed.
The watershed tour by helicopter certainly helped me get a good feel for the
issues impacting this watershed. On behalf of the other members of the
Council, I want to say that I was impressed with the work, planning and
programs in the agricultural and urban areas of Santa Ana. I commend you
for your efforts to preserve open space, to plan development carefully, and
to manage your stomr water and waste water runoff. It is heartening to see
so many stakeholders working together, and you are all a tremendous
example of responsible watershed management for the State.
I appreciate the importance of the SARI line. The technology that you are
using to dispose of saline stormwater runoff is remarkable.
I appreciate the time and effort you contributed to this meeting, as well as
your perspective on these very important issues. Your involvement helped
make the meeting a success.
Sincerely,
ary rc
Sea tary of Resources
The California Resources Agency
Cali/ombCmiervplpn CaptCrygmMnt Wbmrin9R WOMney Ceprlmm(WCuyerwpm.peperlmenfo/FiSlibGameOeparrynmrdrveilry8firefl0le(lian Cepammenlo/PoM1ybRe[rtplgn Oeparcmmlo/4Ya�Pr Peiwrtef•[aYlomq Coailol Cammillion•Cafilgrva rMceCMrmanryCox�ePa Vallry Moumolm Can[erranry5nn lapuln Piver[amervomySpnlo AYm¢o Mounlaint[m,emnry CokryLO Purer PoeNalCnli/iaaMgY PelWnes,Canurwlipnb0ercbpmmirpmmlMian`ranrm�el(a BaYCwrernalim80[relopmeMCPnmlrvon SonW6,ielb Loner LorPn]eb Pirertd Mcunlam Cmurvomy
MMNn Wll[CMfervanry SM�e C[aROl ComnM,Ky Stale Lon41 Commlaam Stale Pttbmotm BaarJ Ab1im Pmen[an NerNogeCdnminion
1 4;0SYNAGRO A Raidwis Management Company
January 11, 2002
Dear Valued Customer,
I am very pleased to advise you that our Company, Synagro Technologies, Inc., has
reached a favorable settlement of a legal matter that has been important not only to our
organization, but to our customers in local government and the entire wastewater
treatment and residuals management industry. The matter I am referring to is the so-
called Marshall case, which alleged that an individual's death resulted from the land
application of biosolids by a company we acquired. Over the last few years this case
has from time to time bee the sub'ect of natiol3ill publicity that raised questions
the sa ety of biosolids recycling.
The litigation was filed in New Hampshire in February 1999 by the estate of a young
man named Shayne Conner, who died suddenly in his sleep in November 1995
approximately one month after biosolids were applied as fertilizer to a hay field near his
home. While Mr. Conners death was tragic we knew from the beginning that the land
application of biosolids had nothing to do with It.
I am pleased to tell you that in settling this matter, plaintiffs stated specifically that the
science they developed to pursue the case did not prove that biosolids caused or
contributed to the death, nor any of the alleged injuries or illnesses of other residents in
the area. Throughout the suit, we maintained, based on well-accepted independent
scientific research and voluminous expert opinions, that there was no evidence that
linked the death to biosolids applied on fans fields. We denied all of the claims alleged
by the plaintiffs and their primary expert, Dr. David Lewis. We pointed out that, in direct
contradiction to the plaintiffs' experts, the Acting Chiet Medical Examiner of New
Hampshire who conducted Mr Conners autopsy concluded that "Mr. Conners death
was not the result of possible environmental conditions created by the use of such
feer iTizer— no Uii-d suc matena ski contribute two his deeath. t is tmp to note that other
mem amt w o resi a wrt im a e same rest ence, inc u tng is ro er
an d mo er, were completely unaffected by environmental con ttions on t
S avne onners ea Two�ndepepdentpathoingists_who together have performed
more than 15 000 autopsies rh i ring th_Eil careers also concluded the death was
unrelated to biosolids.
We know that the land application of biosolids is safe and we were pursuing a vigorous
defense of our Company and the biosolids industry. The settlement, however, was the
right thing for our Company because it provided a means to end a lawsuit that had no
clear end in sight, avoid the expense of protracted litigation and resolve an ongoing
distraction to our management team.
1800 Bering Drive,Suite 1000,Houston,TX 77057 • Ph: (713)369-1700 • Toll Free:(800)370-0035
tr
Most important, I want to assure you that this case never had a scientific or medical
basis. We were able to establish this through the swom testimony of the plaintiffs' own
expert. Dr. David Lewis, on whose novel theories the case was largely developed. In
the end, even the plaintiffs-the very family members who brought the suit after
suffering the loss of their son -agreed no case could be made.
In a statement incorporated into the settlement agreement, Joanne Marshall, mother of
the deceased, and her husband, Thomas, stated: "The science developed in this case
did not prove that the sewage sludge Synagro's predecessor applied on the Hughes
Field in Greenland, New Hampshire in October 1995 caused or contributed to Shayne
Conner's death, nor did the science prove that the sewage sludge caused any of the
injuries or illnesses the other residents of Tuttle Lane allegedly suffered."
In defending our Company, we were able to depose under oath the plaintiffs' expert
witness, Dr. Lewis, on whose theories the case had been constructed. This exercise
was eye-opening, to say the least. By Lewis' own admissions, we were able to
establish that he has neither the scientific background nor professional credentials to
speak authoritatively on biosolids management. We came to find that his opinions are
based almost solely on anecdotal reports of health effects- not proven scientific
evidence- and as a result, his claims are totally without merit. We learned that while
he is an employee of the Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA has divorced itself
from Lewis' views on biosolids and directed him to make clear that his work is not
endorsed by the agency.
Biosolids recycling has been practiced safety in the United States for more than 150
years and has never been shown to cause illness or public health problems when
handled within the federal regulatory framework, even to those closely exposed to it in
their daily work in wastewater treatment plants across the country. Biosolids recycling
has been scientifically established as beneficial to agriculture and provides an
environmentally sound means to manage the nation's treated biosolids. It has been
highly studied and is tightly regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
under the Clean Water Act. Practiced in accordance with federal regulations, it is safe
and beneficial.
As you might imagine, we are very pleased with this outcome-for our Company and
our customers, and we wanted to share this news with you. If you would like additional
information, please do not hesitate to call on me or any of our Synagro representatives.
Sincerely,
Ross M. Patten t
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer -
1800 Bering Drive,Suite 1000,Houston,TX 77057 • Ph: (713).369-17IIf0*To11Frw(WM 370.0035
SYNAGRO
A Raidna4 Management Company
CONTACT: Alvin L.Thomas
General Counsel
(713)369-1700
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 8, 2002
SYNAGRO ANNOUNCES FAVORABLE SETTLEMENT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
LITIGATION
HOUSTON,TEXAS,January 8,2002—Synagro Technologies,Inc. (NASDAQ Small
Cap: SYGR),a full service provider of residuals management services,today announced that it
reached a favorable settlement of a lawsuit in New Hampshire that alleged the death of an
individual resulted from the land application of biosolids by a company Synagro later acquired.
As part of the settlement, plaintiffs stated specifically that the science they developed to pursue
the case did not prove that biosolids applied on a farm field caused or contributed to the death,
nor did it cause any of the alleged injuries or illnesses of other residents in the area. The suit was
brought in February 1999 by the estate of Shayne Conner,who died suddenly in his sleep in
November 1995 approximately one month after biosolids were applied as fertilizer to a field near
his neighborhood. The case arose before Synagro acquired the business against which the suit
was filed.
Throughout the suit,Synagro maintained,based on well-accepted independent scientific research
and voluminous expert opinions,that there was no evidence that linked the death to biosolids
land applied on farm fields. Synagro repeatedly denied all of the claims alleged by the plaintiffs
and their primary expert,Dr. David Lewis. Synagro pointed out that,in direct contradiction to
the plaintiffs' experts, the Acting Chief Medical Examiner of New Hampshire who conducted
Mr. Conner's autopsy concluded that"Mr. Conner's death was not the result of possible
environmental conditions created by the use of such fertilizer,nor did such materials contribute
to his death. It is important to note that other members of his family who resided with him at the
same residence, including his brother and mother,were completely unaffected by environmental
conditions on the night of Shayne Conner's death." Two independent pathologists who together
have performed more than 15,000 autopsies during their careers also concluded the death was
unrelated to biosolids.
The specific terms of the settlement agreement are confidential and are not being disclosed. The
Company,however,indicated that the settlement would have no significant impact on the
Company's earnings or financial position.
'"this is a very good result for our Company and the residuals management industry overall,and
it was in the best interest of both parties to bring the matter to a close," said Ross M. Patten,
Synagro's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "While the young man's death was tragic, the
land application of biosolids had nothing to do with it. We know that the land application of
treated biosolids is safe, and we were pursuing a vigorous defense of our Company and the
biosolids industry. This settlement provided a means to end a lawsuit that had no clear end in
sight, avoid the expense of protracted litigation, and resolve an on-going distraction to our
management team."
Mr. Patten added, "Most important, we want the public to know this case never had a sound
scientific or medical basis. We were able to establish this through the sworn testimony of the
plaintiffs' own expert, Dr. David Lewis, on whose novel theories the case was largely based. In
the end,even the plaintiffs—the very family members who brought the suit after suffering the
loss of their son -- agreed no case could be made."
In a statement incorporated into the settlement agreement,Joanne Marshall,mother of the
deceased, and her husband,Thomas, stated: "The science developed in this case did not prove
that the sewage sludge Synagro's predecessor applied on the Hughes Field in Greenland,New
Hampshire,in October 1995 caused or contributed to Shayne Conner's death, nor did the science
prove that the sewage sludge caused any of the injuries or illnesses the other residents of Tuttle
Lane allegedly suffered."
Mr. Patten also noted that, "Biosolids recycling has been practiced safely in the United States for
more than 150 years and has never been shown to cause illness or public health problems when
handled within the federal regulatory framework,even to those closely exposed to it in their
daily work in wastewater treatment plants across the country. And that remains we today.
Biosolids recycling has been scientifically established as beneficial to agriculture and provides
an environmentally sound means to manage the nation's treated biosolids. It has been highly
studied and is tightly regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean
Water Act. Practiced in accordance with federal regulations,it is safe and beneficial."
Synagro is focused exclusively on organic residuals management services, and has operations in
38 states located throughout the country. The Company has positioned itself as the leading
national provider of organic residuals management services to municipal, industrial, and
agricultural generators throughout North America.
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties or other factors not under the
Company's control which may cause the actual results, performance or achievement of the Company to be
materially different from the results, performance or other expectations implied by these forward-looking
statements. These factors include, but are not limited to (1) unseasonable weather, (2) changes in government
regulations, and(3)the ability to access debt and equity financing when needed. Other factors are discussed in the
Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
$OAeh t£.revt
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
1 6
January 16,2002
Dear Colleague:
'bane:
(714)962.2411
p141962-oaSS 1 am writing to inform you of an important effort that is underway to help raise awareness of the need for
increased investment in California's physical inGastructme. This is a personal invitation to you tojoin
with the Orange County Sanitation District and others to make the vision of dedicated and consistent
aemna i4tlr ss' funding for wastewater infrastructure a reality.
P.Q 8.6127
Fountain vale,G
92726-6127 Our wastewater facilities and systems are not only falling short on funds,they are being overwhelmed as
.v..x.tlarnc California experiences rapid population and industrial growth. Moreover,environmental regulations and
low Sam Ave Lie compliance continue to increase our operating costs. Even though local governments and the state have
rou°rem vasar.ra 92]0e-]016 invested billions of dollars to create a vast network of sewers and treatment plants,the State Water
Resources Board estimates a gross need of S2.8 billion to continue to support state-funded local
infrastructure programs over the next ten years.
atember
ftanchut
0 Unless our sewer infrastructure assets are properly maintained and new systems are added to meet
projected growth,the value of am current investment in wastewater infrastructure will be diminished as
aaas the entire system deteriorates before our eyes. The need for increased investment in our state's wastewater
Mahelm infrastructure demands enhanced visibility of California policymakers,residents and community leaders.
area
Buena Park The California Rebuild America Coalition(CalRAC)is a non-profit,broad-based organization whose
Fountam`m Y.y mission is to build support for dedicated and consistent sources of funding for California infrastructure
Fofianp" facilities and systems at levels sufficient to sustain them. Based in Sacramento,Ca1RAC is an independent
Garden Grove
Huntington aeach partner of the national Rebuild America Coalition located in Washington,D.C.
Irvine
Le Habra Le Palma g g g CaIRAC reconm ends a combination of federal,state,regional and local funding strategies to address
I.os aernw. California's wastmvater infrastructure. Enclosed you will find some background materials outlining these
Newnan Beach recommendations as well as a copy of the Coalition's recently released communications piece,"Focus on
�taa
wecerde California Infrastructure: Wastewater Collection&Treatment",which highlights California's wastewater
,ante are infrastructure and its funding needs.
Seal Beach
Benton As our organization plans for the coming year,I encourage you to join us in supporting the critical efforts
rusvn Y g P g Y g Y 1 PPo g
Woo Park of the California Rebuild America Coalition by becoming a contributing member. Your perspective and
Yorbe Linda support will be a welcome contribution to the ongoing dialogue of California's infrastructure investment
ea." a or.nae needs. Together we can help California policy makers,community leaders and the public tackle the
difficult task of rebuilding,upgrading, replacing or expanding infrastructure facilities and systems
s.rlca" ur.ulct. to meet the challenges of the new century.
Costs Arlene Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. You may also contact Mike
Nueway rxr Bowman at 916-442-6911,Ext.20,or visit the Coalition's website at www.calrac.ore for more
•rarer mseNas information. Thank you for you time and consideration.
IMne Ranch
Blake Anderson
General Manager
to maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management.
FOCUS
,�r CALIFORNIA Wastewater Collection &
REBUILD AMERICA
ri�,_,�+.Ij�1 C,�OALITION Treatment
Wastewater collection and treatment:it's doubtful that many Californians ever
The California Rebuild America think about it.Yet it directly affects each of us,and is vital to the health of the
Coalition(CalRAC)is a broad-based, states environment and economy.
nonprofit organization whose The wastewater infrastructure is the system that handles the statess raw sewage:
mission is to build support for a surprisingly complex process that moves wastewater through a vast web of pipes,
dedicated,consistent sources of into treatment facilities and safely into our screams,riven and the Pacific Ocean.
funding for California infrastructure The good news is that our wastewater infrastructure has been generally
facilities and systems,at levels reliable over the years.
sufficient to sustain them.
The bad news is that it won't continue to be,without increased investment.Why?
For more information,e-mail CaIRAC ■ The states population has boomed and continues to grow
at udorwcdh ac.m 9,of visit the Weh shr-
www.calrac.org. ■ Much of our wastewater system is old and deteriorating
■ There are new environmental mandates to honor
• Maintenance and operations Costs have escalated
Infrastructure Today
How big is California's wastewater infrastructure?The numbers arc staggering.
■ In Orange County,7,000 miles of privately owned sewer line,7,000 miles of
city-owned sewer line and 400 miles of trunk line carry 243 million gallons of
wastewater per day.
■ In Sacramento County,3,000 miles of sewer line and 90 miles of interceptors
serve one million customers across a 250-square-mile area.
Not surprisingly,in recent years there have been signs that the states aging
wastewater infrastructure has begun to erode.Because of increased flow volume,
pipe diameter is no longer sufficient.To make matters worse,tree roots have
invaded lines,household grease has dogged pipes and pumps have failed.As a
result,there have been sewer overflows,sometimes with serious consequences
such as beach closures.And with Californias population projected to grow about
70 percent in the near 40 years, matters will only worsen.
FOCUS ON INFRASTRUCTURE
At the policy laved.there has been growing attention to Recommendations
the need for maintaining our existing infrastructure assets
and expanding capacity. CaIRAC recommends a combination of federal,state.
regional and local funding strategies to address Califomiat
The American Society of Civil wasEngtewateers'r
infrastructure
trporrre Wastewatermfastma.m.
forAmrrirai Infiarrrurmm gave wazrcwater infrasrtuaurc
a'D,"estimating an annual S 12 billion shortfall in funding The Water Infrastructure Network(WIN)Report Water
needs nationally. In/rasrmauve Nmocalls for an initial S57 billion federal
Findings of a report commissioned in 1999 by the City investment for a five-year period.Thiswlll address a shortfall
and County of San Francisco paint a similar picture: of an annual S73 billion gap between current spending
- Between 1991 and 1996,sewer backlogs grew from and projected needs forwater and wastewater Infrastructure
$3 million to over S35 million,largely because the and compliance funding.
city's 894 miles of sewer lines arc close to 100 years old.
As an active member of the WIN Coalition,CdIRAC endorses
_ During the nest 30 Mrs,a 33 percent increase in Water Infrastructure Now s recommendations for.
the number of sewer failures is likely.
r To reduce the sewer backlog and keep pace with sewer = Sustained and reliable long-term federal landing
failures,about 7.1 miles of sewer line needs replacing r: Capitalization of state financing authorities to distribute
each year—at air approximate cost of S15 million. funds in fiscally responsible and Flexible ways
In the early days of the Clean Water Act,up to 90 percent r Focus on critical'core'infrastructure needs and
of clean water funding came from the federal government. non-point source pollution
Now,the situation is reversed.with local resources account-
able for 90 percent.The decline continues. s Streamlined federal administration of the
It is imperative that policy-makers and community leaders funding program
respond quickly to this ineressingly urgent issue.The a Adequately financed state programs to diminish
health and well-being of Californians arc at stake.
the impact of-unfunded mandates'
c Funds for technology and management innovation to
improve productivity
= Expanded assistance to communities most in need
1112e306o easeetca
COALITION With diminishing federal supportlocal dollars will
account for some 80 percent of wastewater funding.
www.calracorg Therefore,in addition to supporting the WIN agenda.
we must be willing to explore and implement state,
Development and printing of this brochure were donated by regional and local funding strategies such as:increasing
the availability of low-interest and interest-free loans from
V iv7 the California Infrastructure and Economic Development
URS Corporation. Bank:issuing bonds and raising sewer fees to better reflect
the cost of service.
SCAP
MONTHLY UPDATE
February 2002
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF A Message from the Executive Director...
PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS There have been times since September 11, and I'm sure
you've felt the same, that I've looked at issues in our industry and haven't felt the same, well, "fire in the
belly," that usually comes rushing up the old intestines upon hearing
the latest about some hot-button issue. [Editorial Note: Those hot IMPORTANT!
button issues would include anything related to a Notre Dame loss or
three-digit scores an the golf course]. February 2 PI: 10:30 am-
12:30 pm of the City of Los
And so it was with a sense of almost relief that I felt the familiar Angeles' Hyperion Plant:
adrenaline surge in my stomach when I read about the bacterial
TMDL that was recently approved by the Los Angeles Regional Craig Wilson-The SWRCs's
Water Quality Control Board. Now, by no means do I think that the head of 303(d) policy has
threat to our nation's security has been alleviated. In fact, after the agreed to meet with SCAP
President's State of the Union address the other night, I am members and answer
convinced of two things: 1) Presidents don't idly call three countries questions about the process
the "axis of evil"in a speech that is broadcast around the world he is proposing for the
without some kind of really good reason and, 2) that really good policy. It's a good time to
reason makes me long for the days when I would get really ticked off bring up any questions you
about Kern farmers calling our biosolids "toxic." Oh, how innocent may have on data used by
we all were. your Region to develop
their 303(d) list.
But life has a wonderful, if at times irritating, way of going on, and please rsvp by February 14th
so my dear readers, this month I offer up the "Tale of Two TMDLs" to the SCAP office if you
and after you read it-you tell me if I'm getting worked up over plan to attend.
nothing.
Upcoming Meetings It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. [Editorial
Note: Before I find Mr. Miller's name plastered all over Plagiarism
Joint Meeting:Air& Masotti Monthly, for the record, that line was even better the first time I read it
Committees—Tuesday,February in Mr. Charles Dickens' novel]. And in a city that was home to a lot of
5,2002 10:00-Noon. LACSD. people, many of them famous, a lot of waste was being generated.
This city was like any other big city in America except for two things:
All members of the Biosolids it was located next to some formerly nice beaches, and it had no
Committee are invited to join the professional football team.
Air Quality Committee on the 5
February to discuss the South C Now, while the majority of the waste being generated was being
Coast Air Quality Management taken care of in a safe way, some of it was making its way down
District's (SCe (PR 1 proposed creeks and rivers and right into the waterfront, bringing lots of germs
composting role (PR 1133) aimed9 9
at controlling ammonia and VOC to the beaches; beaches which had been immortalized in award-
air emissions emanating from winning documentaries such as "Bikini Beach" and "Beach Blanket
composting facilities. Bingo," and classical tunes such as "Sulfin' USA." But I digress.
What is important is to know that millions of people (actually around
60 million) use these beaches each summer. About 1 million use
30200 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE S"SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675"
EMAIL: krisialscao.occoxmail com"PHONE:(949)489-7676•FAX:(949)489-0150
Monthly Update 2 February 2002
them during the winter, and sometimes they were swimming in some yucky stuff. [Editorial Note:
You'll never see this kind of colorful and incisive prose from the British literary establishment].
One day, the local officials whose job it was to make sure that the water was for drinkin' and that
whiskey didn't contaminate it, decided that it was time to clean up those beaches. And in the
inimitable way that only democratic governments can do, they made a decision that was both good
and bad.
On the good side, instead of just requiring a few people to clean up their act like they had been
doing, they looked at everybody and said, "Quit using the great outdoors as a trash can," or words to
that effect. They developed a Trash TMDL that made the city responsible for removing trash from
waterways.
On the bad side, the water officials also said, "Money is no object"— literally. When the city told
the water officials that the Trash TMDL would cost$1 billion dollars, the water officials said the
benefits outweigh the costs.
One year later, the water officials decided it was time to look at the second way they would clean
up the water—a Bacterial TMDL for dry weather and one for wet weather. Good so far. But then the
city pointed out that to comply with the wet weather TMDL, it would cost over$5,000 for each winter
beach user— per visit. The water officials said the benefits outweigh the costs.
There are 65 more TMDLs to come and the city will spend over$1 billion and probably much
more to comply with just two. There is no joy in Mudville.
But Ray, you say, this is storm water stuff— how does this affect me? Precedent, chums, precedent.
Soon, the Nitrogen TMDL will be formulated, and guess who will be affected by that one—probably
every inland discharger within the LARWQCB's territory. Based upon the model of decision making
utilized to-date, it would be fair to anticipate that the benefits will again outweigh the costs to POTWs.
And, of course, the larger issues are: Where does the money come from? Will POTWs end up taking
dry and wet weather Flows for treatment? What level of treatment is sufficient? Should all Flows be R/O'd
and reused for potable purposes?
So I ask you —am I off base here? Or am I just resistant to any kind of change and should just save my
intestinal trauma for biosolids issues?
Let me know. And just in case you think I've got a bad case of the grumbles, read about the issues
forum Mary Jane Forster Foley set up with EPA Region 9 Administrator Wayne Nastri last month in
Orange County. Very positive, very timely and very much what SCAP will be expanding upon in the
coming months.
Rhetorically,
Ray Miller
Monthly Update 3 February 2002
Water Issues
Los Angeles RWQCB Adopts Bacterial Indicator TMDL
On January 24, the LARWQCB adopted a bacterial indicator TMDL that covers 44 beaches rimming the
Santa Monica Bay. This action comes on the heels of a trash TMDL that was adopted last year and
precedes metals and organic pollutant TMDLs that are expected in the next few years.
The TMDL process is required by the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act, but pressures to implement the
TMDL Program are an outgrowth of a consent decree settlement reached in a lawsuit filed by
environmental organizations in the late 1990s; the decree required that the TMDL be adopted by March
2002. Based upon a 1995 epidemiological study conducted in the Santa Monica Bay, links between poor
water quality and health effects were established. The study further concluded that the source of high
indicator bacteria counts was primarily urban runoff.
Using four indicator organisms (Total Colifonn, Fecal-to-Total ratio, Fecal Coliform and Enterococcus),
numeric targets were selected based upon their ability to protect Rec-1 beneficial use and AB411 and
Basin Plan requirements. The numeric targets are to be met at"point zero" (the 'Wave wash" area of the
beach), during summer dry-weather and winter dry-weather flows (Note: Winter wet-weather
determinations were bifurcated from this TMDL and will be proposed in a future action).
Based upon this data, the three POTWs that discharge to the Santa Monica Bay (LACSD, City of Los
Angeles and Las Virgenes Municipal Water District), were assigned waste load allocations of zero (0)
exceedence days during dry-weather. This action means,that POTWs are not allowed to cause any
exceedence days at any of the beaches during the dry-weather periods year round. Municipalities that
discharge storm water through drains into Santa Monica Bay must comply with zero exceedence days
during the summer dry-weather period and no more than 3 exceedence days during winter dry-weather.
Municipalities have three years to comply with summer dry-weather requirements (some agencies will
divert flows into the POTWs), and six years to comply with winter dry-weather requirements.
Several agencies requested that the technical and physical feasibility of the requirements be evaluated.
Agencies are concerned about the cost of treating winter flows for a relatively small population of beach
users, the availability of land for treatment facilities, the operational capabilities, the lack of funding
sources and the shortness of the compliance schedule. The Board declined to address these issues.
SCAP Coordinates Forum with EPA Region 9 Administrator Wayne Nastri
In the first of what is hoped will be a series of local meetings, EPA Region 9 Administrator Wayne
Nastri met with a consortium of Orange County public agencies to be briefed on issues of importance to
them, and to hear Mr. Nastri's initial impressions and thoughts regarding EPA and Orange County.
Mary Jane Forster Foley, in coordination with Lisa Murphy of Orange County Sanitation District and
Joyce Gwidt of Irvine Ranch Water District, arranged for Mr. Nastri to hear 10-minute briefings from the
Municipal Water District of Orange County, the Orange County Water District, County of Orange, Orange
County Sanitation District and Irvine Ranch Water District.
Mr. Nastri expressed his appreciation for the concise information he had received, and related his top
three priorities for his administration:
Monthly Update 4 February 2002
• Support decision making at the state and local levels by improving communication between EPA
and local agencies;
• Support innovative technology and communications that will allow information to be compiled and
will answer the questions: Is the air cleaner? Is the water cleaner? Is the land protected?
• Determine what is EPA's role in countering terrorism —that is, compiling information, heading off an
attack, restricting sensitive information from their website.
Similar meetings with Mr. Nastri are proposed for other counties over the coming year.
TMDL Chief Meets with Tri-TACISCAP Reps
[Note: Please see related Meeting Notice on Page 1]
Water Committee Member Sharon Green submitted the following report on a meeting held with Craig J.
Wilson, the SWRCB chief staff member for the 303d listing process:
• SWRCB has received the staff reports from all Regional Boards, but not the complete
administrative records.
• They are just developing a proposal for how they are going to evaluate all of the lists. They plan to
explain all of the factors that go into the judgment calls being made. They state that their goals are
consistency and technical rigor; they want to avoid listings without a valid basis.
• They anticipate having the proposed list ready to go out for public review in March, with a public
hearing to follow in May. They will definitely have a public hearing in Northern California and are
still considering whether to also have one in Southern California.
• They then anticipate that they would bring the final list back to the Board for adoption 2-3 months
later; depending on how many comments they receive.
• Their final deadline is to have it adopted and submitted to EPA by October 2002.
• They are not yet sure what they are going to do about the 305(b) report, but it sounded like they
may postpone doing it.
• They do not plan to put all of the supporting data on their website because it would be too much
work, but any interested party will be welcome to come and look through the entire administrative
record and get copies of whatever they want.
On a related note, LACSD has requested and will receive, detailed data on a CD from the Los Angeles
Regional Board. Sharon suggests that other SCAP members keep requesting the data that they want
from their Regional Boards, because it will probably be easier than trying to get it from the SWRCB.
EPA Released Load Allocation Guidelines
States are responsible for allocating loads among point and nonpoint sources identified under each
TMDL. On January 16, EPA released a new water quality model: Allocating Loads and Wasteloads for
Watersheds and TMDLs. The new model encourages that during the allocation process authorities
consider a range of allocation options that are technically feasible and demonstrate programmatic
consistency.
Monthly Update 5 February 2002
According to EPA: "Allocations for a particular watershed or TMDL are likely to be based on competing
measures of desirability, such as cost effectiveness and equity. Final allocation determinations are policy
decisions and should reflect public perceptions about acceptable tradeoffs between these measures. As
an example, allocation strategies that minimize costs may be deemed unfair if particular sources are
burdened with most of the cost, while allocations based on equal load reductions may be more costly."
EPA's website model demonstrates cost-minimization frameworks and provides examples of load
allocations and cost distributions for a case study watershed. For more information go to:
http://www.epa.govtwaterscience/models/allocation/.
SARBS Sponsors Collections and SCADA Systems Seminar
The Santa Ana River Basin Section of the California Water Environment Association is sponsoring two
upcoming seminars:
• Regulatory Update and Sewer System Maintenance Seminar that will address storm drain rules
and regulations, CMOM, root control, urban run-off and environmental crimes. The seminar will be
held on Thursday, February 28, 2002, from 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the El Toro Water District
Wastewater Reclamation Plant, 23542 Moulton Parkway in Laguna Woods. For further
information contact: Stacy Mercurio, Water 3— (949)888-8597, Ralph Palomares, ETWD—(949)
837-7050 ext 104 or Henry Williams—(760) 947-2487.
• Evolving SCADA And Data Management Systems For Wastewater Facilities that will address
selecting, developing and upgrading a SCADA system, collection system electronic mapping for
improved maintenance, developing a district-wide data management system, maintaining and
upgrading your SCADA system. The seminar will be held on Wednesday, March 13, from 8:00
a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at the Sheraton Anaheim Hotel, 900 South Disneyland Drive, Anaheim, California.
For further information contact Brian Peck at (949)234-5411 or bpeck@socwa.com.
Air Quality
Proposed Rule 1133 Composting Emissions Study RFP Nears Completion
Air Quality Committee Vice-Chair Greg Adams reports that Committee members have met with
SCAQMD staff several times to define the scope of work for the Request for Proposals for the Composting
Study. Six agencies—LACSD, the City of Los Angeles, the City of San Diego, OCSD, Eastern MW D and
Inland Empire Utilities Agency- have each contributed $25,000 to fund the study. The RFP will be sent to
10-12 firms by the first week of February.
The City of Los Angeles has made available its static pile composting facility In Griffith Park as the test
facility for producing mesophilically digested compost. The purpose of the study is to quantify the life
cycle emissions coming off anaerobically digested sludge as It goes through an active 28-day composting
phase, and a 28-day curing phase using"aerated static pile" technology. RFPs are due back by February
15 (a recommended job walk will be held on February 7). with a contractor selected and on-site by March
11. A final report is due by June 6.
Monthly Update 6 February 2002
Based upon the pending study, the Air Committee is optimistic that SCAQMD staff will present
alternatives to their Board for Rule 1133 that will include something other than covering all of the
composting facilities (both active and curing).
Coatings Testing Proaram Releases Interim Report
The project that was begun in 2000 to test architectural coatings that will be reformulated to comply with
new SCAQMD and CARB VOC emissions reductions has released an interim report. Agencies interested
in obtaining a copy of the report should contact Kris or Linda at the SCAP office at (949)489-7676.
EPA to Require Title V Emissions Offset Bank
The Title V Ad Hoc Committee that was formed by SCAQMD and is comprised of Title V permit
holders, including some SCAP members, met with SCAQMD staff recently. Currently Title V provides for
variances from emissions limits if equipment breaks down. EPA is now requiring that an offset bank of
emissions credits be established to cover the emissions that will be discharged in the event of a
breakdown. It is very difficult to find credits, and when found, they are very expensive. The Committee
will be actively involved in this issue.
CARB to Release California Air Plan
The California Air Resources Board is due to release the California Air Plan in February; the Plan will
have a big impact on portable and stationary diesel equipment. The Committee will report on this issue at
their March meeting.
New Report Examines Environmental Justice in Environmental Permitting
A new report, issued by the National Academy of Public Administration, identifies how environmental
justice could be incorporated into the EPA's air, water, and waste permitting programs. The study was
designed to further the ability of environmental justice groups, academics, regulated industries, and state,
tribal and local governments to understand how to effectively bring environmental justice considerations to
the attention of environmental permitting authorities. For more information, click on the following LIRL:
http://www.Igean.org/html/whatsnew.dm?id=321
Biosolids
Biosolids Committee Sets Meetino Dates and Goals
Biosolids Committee Chair Diane Gilbert reports that the Committee held its first meeting of the year on
January 16. The Committee's newly appointed Chair and Vice-Chair, along with other committee
members, discussed the scheduling of meetings and a number of biosolids regulatory issues facing the
membership that will be placed on upcoming agendas. Suggestions under consideration include
presentations of biosolids management options, a communications program,workshops on specific
subjects, and inviting guest speakers with related expertise to participate.
Regular meetings will be held in March, July and December, usually at LACSD in Whittier, or at another
location that will be announced by the SCAP office three-to-four weeks ahead of time. The Committee will
Monthly Update 7 February 2002
also meet jointly with Tri-TAC's Land Committee when meetings are held in southern California, usually in
January, May and October, meeting most of the time near the Ontario airport.
Special called meetings will be held as necessary, as in the instance of the previously announced
combined meeting of the Air Quality and Biosolids Quality Committees on February 5 at LACSD to discuss
the SCAQMD proposed composting rule, PR 1133. For further information, you may contact the SCAP
office or the Chair or Vice-Chair as follows:
Chairperson: Diane Gilbert
Address: Hyperion Treatment Plant, Harrington Building 0 Floor, 12000 Vista del Mar, Playa del Rey, CA
90293 Telephone* 310-648-5248, FAX#: 310-648-5114 Email:DXG(alsan.ci.la.ca.us
Co-Chairperson: Gary Hackney
Address: Inland Empire Utilities Agency, 9400 Cherry Avenue. Bldg. A, Fontana, CA 92335 Telephone#.,
909-357-0241, FAX#:909-357-3884 Email:ghacknev(Wieua.org
National Blosolids Partnership(NBPI Releases 2001.2002 Annual Report
The NBP 2001-2002 Annual Report has been released and is available for viewing on the Partnership's
web site. The report highlights the NBP's accomplishments during 2001, action plan for 2002, how the
EMS program is benefiting the demonstration agencies, and other related information. To view the
report, click on http://biosolids.policy.netttoolboxinbp report 2002. Note: The PDF file is 2 MB in size and
takes a couple of minutes to load.
Alleged Death from Blosolids Lawsuit Settled (courtesy NeP1
Synagro Technologies announced that it reached a favorable settlement in a lawsuit in New
Hampshire that alleged the death of an individual resulted from the land application of biosolids by a
company Synagro later acquired. As part of the settlement, plaintiffs stated specifically that the science
they developed to pursue the case did not prove that biosolids applied on a farm field caused or
contributed to the death, nor did it cause any of the alleged injuries or illnesses of other residents in the
area.
The suit was brought in February 1999 by the estate of Shayne Conner, who died suddenly in his sleep
in November 1995, approximately one month after biosolids were applied as fertilizer to a field near his
neighborhood. Synagro maintained, based on independent scientific research and expert opinions,that
there was no evidence that linked the death to biosolids land applied on fans fields. Synagro denied all of
the claims alleged by the plaintiffs and their primary expert, Dr. David Lewis. Two independent
pathologists (who together have performed more than 15,000 autopsies during their careers) also
concluded the death was unrelated to biosolids.
In a statement incorporated into the settlement agreement, Joanne Marshall, mother of Shayne, and
her husband, Thomas, stated: "The science developed in this case did not prove that the sewage sludge
Synagro's predecessor applied on the Hughes Field in Greenland, NH, in October 1995 caused or
contributed to Shayne Conner's death, nor did the science prove that the sewage sludge caused any of
the injuries or illnesses the other residents of Tuttle Lane allegedly suffered."
Monthly Update 8 February 2002
WEF Biosolids Specialty Conference Set for March rwurtesv Navy
The WEF Biosolids Specialty Conference— "Privatization, Innovation and Optimization:How to Do
More for Less"—will be held in Austin, TX from March 3-6, 2002. This year's technical program features
19 sessions focusing on both international and domestic issues facing the residuals and biosolids
profession, including topics on: land application, composting, storage and handling, odor control,
regulatory issues, privatization, thickening and dewatering, biosolids success stories, stabilization and
thermal processes. Three pre-conference workshops will also explore subjects such as the latest news
and happenings on pathogens, designing real automation systems, and dewatering and digestion basics.
All registration forms received by February 1, 2002 will qualify for a discounted registration fee of up to
$110. To register, visit the National Biosolids Partnership (NPB)Web site:
hftp://biosolids.policy.net/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=24501 or the WEF web site:
hftp://www.wef.org/conferences/Biosolids2002/registraton.ihtmi.
Washington State Provides P2 Cost/Benefit Checklist
Environmental managers know that, in most cases, pollution prevention measures can end up saving
their agencies money in the long run. But it can be difficult to figure out exactly how much money will be
saved, and when the agency can expect to see a return on its investment. A fact sheet from the
Washington State Department of Ecology can help make that determination, as well as point out the rare
instances when costs outweigh the benefits. To view the checklist, visit:
hftp:/Avwm.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/95400.pdf.
Non Sequitur
If the Creator had a purpose in equipping us with a neck,
He surely meant us to stick it out.
-Arthur Koesder
GOT
•
\U
How environmental lawyer Luke Cole brought dairy construction
in the San Joaquin Valley to a standstill
Hot¢ : tar.l� of ?tom R fS Z-CM CdeeA�b 004L'lRGS
A-S Q.,A� f45 T%,L- ?-a
hen Luke W.Cole traveled to the stroll San Joaquin Valley town of Hanford 17 months
ago he had a lot of interesting things to say about cow, manum.Who would have
guessed that the typical dairy cow produces about as much waste as 20 people? (rhat
means 1,000 cows produce the same amoum of sewage as a city of 20,000 people.) Or
that, taken together, the dairies now dotting the Central Valley generate more waste
than every man,woman,and child in Texas?
Cole recited these numbers before a group of state leg- directly,and,according to a recent industry-sponsored study,
islators looking into dairy-siring issues,and the response generates 122,000 jobs statewide—in everything from dairy
he got was rather hostile."Oh,you live in San Francisco;' construction to ice cream plants.
said one state senator after listening to Cole's opening The plains of the southern San Joaquin Valley are check-
remarks."You don't have any air pollution problems in esed with 649 dairies,which together produce 44 percent of
San Francisco?" the rates total milk production, nearly double the amount
"Your actions,as it relates to race and poverty,in my opin- produced by the region in the late 1970s.Here,as ehewhere
ion,appear to be directly contradictory toward providing in California,mom-and-pop farm have been almost entirely
employment opportunities:"said mother.And still another replaced by large,highly mechanized operations.During the
asked whether the 39-year-old public interest amomey had 1990s the mute's average herd size increased from 250 cows to
received airy funds from Shamrock Foods, 696,and the number of dames declined
_ a competing enterprise in Ar mom. h from about 4,500 to 2,195.
By Matthew Heller
But perhaps the harshest comment of With an avenge herd size of 1,669,
all Came from state Assemblyman Roy Kern Cowry boasts some of the largest
Ashburn (R-Bakersfield),who suggested photo by Gary Laufman dairies of all, and the county has been
to the applause of the amending audience Especially receptive to dairy developers.In
that Cole was rung the dairy wire as a fi.ndrassing tool-"1 1994, for example, the county, enacted an ordinance that
think thetes a morn going on:'Ashbum said,"and you are at allowed certain dairies to be approved "by right;'that is,
the center of it:' without a perm4 let alone an environmental impact report
"I think the scam is that ...you defend the dairy farms under the California Environmemzl Quality Act (CEQA,
while taking their money,"Cole retorted Pub Res C §§21000 et seq.).Around the same time, the
county hosted a barbecue for dairy farmers from western
Statistically speaking,California is now"America's San Bernardino County looking to relomm.Among those in
Dairyhnd:'a distinction secured several years ago when it attendance was James Borba.
overtook VFmonsirs as the nations largest milk producer.In James and his cousin, George Botha Jr.,started thinking
2000 the starts dairies churned out 32 billion pounds of about the Central Valley after urban encroachment left them
milk The$3.7 billion industry employs about 12,000 people without room to expand their 3,000-bead,140-aae dairy in
China They eventually selected a six in Kim County that
Merdrm HAY is a mparmfor the I.m Angeles Daily Journal. had been slated for a housing project. Several dairies were
itaRUARY 200E 1g CALIFORNIA LAWYER
already in the vicinity,and George Botha got positive feed- secretary and a community outreach worker. Cole, a tall, '
back from local officials, bearded man who sports wire-rimmed glasses and an earring,
The Borbas applied for a two-dairy, complex that would visits at least once a month.
have increased Kern County's cow population by 25 per- The Delano office serves as the nerve center of CRPEs
cent.Each dairy would have about 7,000 milk cows plus an dairy battles.But even before CRPE took on big agriculture,
equivalent number of support cows to replace aging or Cole and his crew were active in the San Joaquin Valley.One
slaughtered animals. In September 1998 the Kern County of their early battles was against a toxic-waste incinerator in
Board of Supervisors rescinded its community develop- Kettleman City.The case,El Pueblo Pam Aire YAgua L'mpia
ment housing plan, effectively giving the Borbas a clear v King'r County (Sacramento County Super Ct, Civ No.
runway.The board also filed a notice of exemption from 366045),ended in 1993 when the defendant abandoned the
CEQA, stating there was no possibility that the dairies pmject.Another case began in 1994, after a Canadian com-
would have "a significant effect on the envimnment:'But pany proposed expanding its toxic-waste dump in the Kern
then the county---and the Borbas—ran into Luke Cole. County town ofButtonwilim,,a community of mostly low-
income Latinos. CRPE's legal actions on behalf of a local
The son of an art history professor and an archi- group included civil rights and CEQA claims. But after a
recturs] preservationist, Cole grew up in Santa Barbara and three-year battle,the Fi@h District Court of Appeal in Fresno
came to his environmental activism ruled in favor of the dump's expan-
early in life.In fact,he attended his lion. Padres Hada Una Vida Mejor v
first antinuclear ally when he was County of Kem,Civ No.F-026488.
twelve years old.After graduating Because For Cole this was a sobering
from Stanford University,he spent adefeat."Because environmental jus-
couple of years with Ralph Nader lice struggles ate political and eco-
in Washington,D.C.,working on a effectivelyexempted a nomic struggles, legal responses
voter-education project and edit- have fdlen woefully short of aid-
ing a consumer newsletter.He then ing communities and in some cases
went on to Harvard Law School. from the Clean Air have hurt their struggles:'he wrote
"I thought I would get my legal in his book, From the Ground Up:
education,go back to Washington, Environmental RKhM and the Rise of
•
and impose policy on people:" he the
state does the Environmental justice Movement
recalls. During a summer intern- (New York University Press,2000).
ship aiding migrant farmworkers in • • • Cole also says he realized that Kern
Newton Grove, North Carolina, County was never going to take
however, Cole found his calling. steps to protect the environment
There,while observing a battle over emissions. without a fight.
a local plant closure that turned on Cole returned to Kern County
an environmental-contamination in 1998 to meet with a group of
issue, Cole saw the way the issue migrant farrrworkers who lived in
galvanized the community across the town of Arvin,just south of
both race and class lines and wanted to get involved. Bakersfield.The workers had contacted CRPE about an
Cole got the opportunity to do just that when the application filed by Richmar Farms of Corona to build a
late Ralph Abascal, who was general counsel of California 2,400-cow dairy in their community.During a meeting at a
Rural Legal Assistance and a man who had brought emi- school auditorium in Arvin,the workers complained to Cole
ronmental justice cases to court since the 1960s, invited that pollution from existing dairies in the area had made
Cole to come to California,with the help of a$5,000 gran[ them sick.The Bmell,they said,was awful,and the swarms of
from the Harvard Fellowship in Public Interest Law.Then, flies a constant irritant."That's when dairy farms hit our radar
in 1989, Cole started the Environmental Justice Project, screen:'Cole says.
which two years later became the Center on Race,Poverty Cole turned down that case because at the time he felt he
and the Environment (CRPE), an organization that's now didn't know enough about the industry. But over the next
made up of three lawyers, two community organizers,and few months he and his associates undertook what might be
one paralegal. Based in San Francisco, CRPE promotes described as a crash course in cow,manure.They learned,for
itself as an agency that"attacks head-on the disproportionate example, that manure emits a number of noxious gases—
burden of pollution and environmental hazards borne by primarily ammonia—and that,kept in open lagoons,manure-
the poor and people of color by providing technical and contaminated water has a way of seeping into groundwater.
legal assistance:' They also learned that there wasn't much the government
In addition to its San Francisco office,CRPE has a four- was doing about it. In fact,because agriculture is effectively
year-old Kern County office in downtown Delano.There, exempted from the Clean Air Act, the state does not even
amid a collection of dime stores,Mexican eateries,and gov- monitor dairy emissions.
ernment offices, CRPE staff attorneys Caroline Farrell and Later in 1998 Cole was reviewing a list of pending devel-
Brent J. Newell share a cluttered second-floor suite with a opment approvals in Kern County when he came across the
FEBRUARY 2002 20 CA4rORMA LAWYER
5
Bolas'proposed 28,000-cow project.Cole calculated that an (filed May 2,2000).Then,on the dry CRPE filed is open-
operation this large would produce a million gallons of liquid ing brief in the case,the company announced that it was
manure a day and thousands of tons of methane,hydrogen abandoning the project, citing business considerations. But
sulfide,and ammonia—an egregious aaault on the emlon- Kings County supervisors blamed the project's demise
men,he concluded. squarely on the litigation The Arroyos felt vindicated"I was
So, in October 1998, Cole lined up a couple of Kern happy because we were able to do something:'says Ester,
County residents,Juan and Aaasusia Cruz,to ace as named who Continues to get the cold shoulder around Corcoran.
plaintif ; and filed a complaint.The suit alleged that the More recently,Cole claimed a victory in'fhlare County,
Borbas'dairy proposal violated CEQA because,among other where CRPE challenged a countywide report on the impact
things, it did not include an environmental impact report confined-animal facilities Batch as dairies would have on air
(EIR).Center on Rot;Poverty and the Environment v County of and water quality.As pan of the setdemen4 the county agreed
Kent, Civ No.237426."It was:'says Cole,"litre shooting fish to analyze cumulative impacts throughout the valley.CRPE v
in a barrel.' County of Tulare, Civ No.00-0190939 (filed May 10,2000).
Apparently so.A few months after the suit was filed,both The cue effectively stopped 60 dairy projects in their tracks.
the county and the Botbas seeded with Cole by agreeing to "Central Valley Counties treat CEQA like driven On Interstate
prepare an EIR,a draft of which Was issued in September 5 treat the speed 1utd4'Cole reflects."Nobody,obeys the Lw.
+�•^ti• . 1999.Meanwhile,media coverage galvanized the opposition. But when you know a cops around, you come closer to
For example,one group (Kern County Neighbors for Qua]. obeying the law,and,every once in a while,you get pulled
icy Air,Water,and Growth) claimed 140 paid members and carer.Well,were the cops:'
400 supporters. But despite the opposition, the board of As a"cap:'though,Cole himself has also been subjected to
supervisor certified the EIR in July 2000. an extraordinary amount of scrutiny in recent years."Hes cre-
Cole promptly filed another lawsuit,this one alleging that ated a lot of antipathy toward himself and his group:'says
the EIR violated California's environmental law by limiting Michael Marsh,who is CEO of the Western United Dairy-
in analysis to the cumulative impacts of the project inside men— n organization that represent more than half of all
Kern County.This was an unreasonable stricture, the cons- the dairies in California—and has called fm investigations of
plaint alleged,since"air pollution is a valley-wide pmblern" CRPEs finances. One charge is that the organization is ille-
Cmrer on Rae,Pomfy and she Envronment v County of Kern, gaily receiving federal funds diverted from California Rural
Civ No.242336(filedAugmt 2000). Leo Assistance (CRLA).Another suspicion is that Arizona
The county responded that data for a regional analysis was dairy interests such as Shamrock,which are looking to make
not readily available,in part because of the sum's lack of mom inmads in California,have supported CRPE.In response to a
raring. Nevertheless,in May 2001 Kern County Superior .,request from Congressman Cal Dooley(D-W..),the federal
Court Judge Roger D.Randall found Kern Countys EIR Legal Services Corp.began an audit of CRLA in January.
"deficient"and ordered the defendants to conduct a study,that According to Cole, CRLA serves only as a source of
covered all of the San Joaquin Valley Basins eight counties. referrals, while CRPE's annual budget of about $400,000
comes primarily from private philanthropic foundations and
By the time Judge Randall issued that order,Cole attorneys fees from successful cases."We're totally clean:'
had a couple more dairy-related victoria under his belt. In Cole declares.
1999 he blocked a 47,700-cow dairy complex that was to Sacramento atmmey Michael H.Remy of Remy,Thorrru
be built on 6,000 acres in Kings County,near the town of & Moose, who has battled Cole in both the Botha and
Comorut.JG Boswell Co.planned to Bell the land to farmers Boswell cases,acknowledges that there is no proof that his
y+'�y'sy'ti who would develop it into four daiia.CRPE filed a lawsuit adversary has"an agenda that's other than environmental"But
t •;':'`.• alleging CEQA violations on behalf of Ester Arroyo and her the concerns of dairy farmers have been exacerbated,he says,
husband. CRPE v County of)Gags, Civ No.99CO656 (filed because there are simply no precise environmental standards
April 13,1999). for them to aria to.And Cole,he adds,has been able to take
The Arroyos,who have nine children,came to Corcoran advantage of this ambiguity to wreak havoc on the industry.
20 years earlier and live in a tidy, rnmped cottage on the "It will take the economies of some of these counties years
outskirts of town.They had a neighbor once whose cows to get back on their feet:' complains Marsh,and he notes,
drew thick clouds of fhies,which made them highly recep- smaller,family dairies are particularly vulnerable.Remy esd-
rive to the idea of serving as plaintiffs when a CRPE orp- mates that the Borbas o far have spent mound $500,000 on
nizer briefed them on Boswells planned project.But they EIRE,which smaller operations couldnt possibly afford."If
didn't fully appreciate how getting involved would put them Botha can't survive,we cant survive;'he says. Kern County
in hot water.'People said,'Why are,you doing this?"'Ester Counsel Bernard C.Bamunn agrees."There);a lot of risk in
Arroyo recalls." 'Dora[ you know this project is going to developing a dairy in the Centel Valley.Botha is the poster
help the economy of Corcoran? "Still,she wouldn't back dairy of what can happen''
down."Something deep inside kept telling me,'Dont smp" For hispart,Cole scoffs at claim that he's Out to destroy
she says. the dairy industry."That's totally specious," he says of the
Like the Borbas.Boswell eventually compiled an EIR. allegcdjob karts."If the dairy operators do what we are asking,
And as in Kern County,Cole wed again,calling the report it may cost a little more,but it will actually create morejobs:'
inadequate. CRPE v County of Kings, Civ No. 0OC10131 Conrinuedonpage55
CALIFORNIA LAWYER 21 FEBRUARY 1002
��'t . -.'PW3 .:Y.:LC.gM4.Y-.:�.Mi Y+4A.�+f,::i.. 8�' .&Q 9i]fl.;�.'.6.'a Sr O!"i- ...,',: :•L 4T.:9MMf .:!`N".H!.Y1,9i51e" ii.' fa!41Y :.:Tw.
Technicalities
ROS1E'S RAMBLINGS M. L, XL, and XXL; the microfnber
Cre�bsg a cu tem' eVEST Version 2.0 with zip-aff deeves is
see Valle .. CondRu dJmNi pose 31 about$150 in mms sizes XS (suitable for
'Thiss'asu'weria vmth both not watertight.)You supply the recorder, small women), S. M. L, XL, and XXL
Neanpe and Intetva plug the microphone cable into the inside (should be available this spring).866/909-
e 'PaRbsv.Open a new 9e of the cover,dose the box,turn it on,and 8378(www scorteveu.comn.
Ito Woos,den choose Taos, forget about itan innocuous little pack-
A®BCovet;avdt6m.�. Back to the big—
r age easy to ignore. It's especially good �� �.Nons
fAomP>miuABYw7ype for conferences, courtrooms, and other Board
p° � �OTOOk' group therapy. What would you think if someone
A�oCa r Getting too 6nry for you? How about offered you a Lapdog or Doggie Bags? I
small, innocuous, plain-ol' omnidirec- doubt you would think of computer cases.
V-ner aodnemeokpa�s,nuih. tional mike embedded in soft,shock-and- (You did? Prove it.) Maybe manufacturer
hypeiCude.l�yemadnmp noise absorbing black rubber nuts only a Shaun Jackson's problem was that these
a�d!<tJRGYor little larger than a Lego rank's tires? Its so Casa are difficult so explain.Folded up,the
s h' small that, even though they are in plain Lapdog looks like a ballistic fabric brief-
. sight,most people will hardy notice them. case,but unfolded, its a lap ortray-table
Yei You have a choice of an easy-to-aim desk with your laptop in the middle and
-rr - gooseneck (like a tnry replica of a sixties the various protective fold-over Flaps hold-
; lamp) or Unobtrusive omnidirectional stub. ing your cables, CDs,and other comput-
.>i>®aLNoaau Or just go for thew standardT microphone ing accoutrements. Everything in one
s)✓iaeliiyemdo dymjher (y99)—rho cable,jUn a one-inch stick with package.Unless, of course, you need to
m 1Ve61omemyoZ;, a trumping at one end and two mikes at carry more—say more files, a portable
N �4 : the other.Just plug it into your MiniDisc printer,a change of underwear.Then you
° recorder, assuming it has the afomnen- slip a pair of Doggie Bags (think Pony
t .srua)Oncvusopm tioned input settings,and that's it.Ask for Express saddlebags) over the Lapdog.
o , eg°W a lavaliere dip if you want to attach it to When you cede onm the plane or into a
7W =w yomjacket. rent-m-ofce, turn the Doggie Baps into
` Eor more info on MiniDiscs, go to a vertical filing system simply by hanging
wwwminidisco.cum. For enough info to them from their top hook. Only draw-
turn you into a Bound professional, go back. No wheels.Lapdog portable work-
��., � m wwwwnmdpmfesaomlLw place, S139.95; Doggie Bags, f59.95.
Shaun Jackson Design, 888/662-4300
MeetYeor aoa NOW h'Mr OwB dII"BmmC11" (wwwrjdedgn.com).
?u?$Yo?udseroehie i You may have seen the SCOTT
yO° eVEST all over the television news in tliam6451"Sim UM MO
to kvowvahxrfnlFn)ee- - December, but until you try it, it looks So,here's this cute silvery box, about
f'OOI'*e hokey--especially if Dan Radher's wearing the she of a stack of four credit cards.OK.
Y
r �0 ss oeech it instead of his "What's the frequency, maybe five. Probably nothing in your
Kenneth"safari jukes In fact,the eVISJ' Lapdog takes up less room. And yet
looks very much like one of those pho- Keyspam s USB 4-Port MiniHub does
tognphers khaki safari jackets,except that everything the larger hubs do. Plus it
sympiccm/mtbemlta,- it also comes in black.The point of the works the very first time. I tested it by
� )' eVEST (and in new sibling,a jacket they switching it from laptop to laptop,all of
B(OS Sambal C''�` // call the eVEST Version 2.0) is not in 15 [hem already running.The first time it
-- 6mishsonscoklbee►sZ.
/ obvious and hidden pockets.It's the than- suer a new laptop,windows 98. 2000,to bor
e
biea�Bho� �Tom•= sues for you tom corral all the wires fio XP warned me [Fi the
e hub needed [o be
Hardware Garde tan The - your cell phone to your ear bud, from self-powered an I plugged the power cable
BIOS(wwe,•y,iom+h+n! your handheld to your cell phone, in(by far the bulkiest put of the product).
wue.com/m mbo.V99g1/ from your MiniDisc player to your micro- Then I plugged in a keyboard and the
990208/indechmd).From phone, from your CD Walkman to your CardScam business card scanner.Windows
C-vBur,nfs:ompei-- headset.Not a simg)e wire dang)a outside informed me it had installed the new
the vest. Best of all, wear the eVEST on devices (even though they were old
;GoTA QuEmoW the plamrit becomes a third carry-on devices) and so had m nebOOL It rebooted
GOTANAtawm? (although you have to, divest yourself of I installed a USB mo se,Windows asked
Stud it m; the eVest to go through securiry).The ro was t- again to reboot, and that w all there
Lmm ton and nylon eVEST with vented neck was to it. $49. Keyspan, 510/222-0131
and back runs about $100 in men's sizes (www.keyspam.com). O
r[BRUARY 202 56 CALIFORNIA NwY[R
FINMOR-MON. -
LF r(Cci �R --WbTHE COASTKEEPEWS
ORA E� WA T C H Winter 2002
COASTREEPER volume 4, Issue
From Orange County CoastKeeper Garry
Brown:
The year holds many potential wa R N 1 N C
� milestones forr Orange County
CoastKeeper and our county's environ- - - .a TER C
menial health. The following is only a COMA CT MA+
partial list of the decisions that will be :.AUSE 1LtNESS
made this year.Each decision will impact BACTERIA LEVELS,E1(CEED
us for many years into the future: HEALTH STANDARDS
Early this year the Regional Water _
Quality Control Boards will adopt a
County Storm Water Permit(MS4).
Southern Orange County falls into the
jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional
Water Quality Control Board. The pro-
posed permit-for South County is one of -
the bCsst in the state for protecting and
ensuring definite improvements in storm
water management. West and Nort
h ' ��f
Orange County are under the jurisdiction IS O'
of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board. That proposed permit is EL COWACTO
definitely the'•weakest link^. PUyE�DE C�A�USrAR ENF���1
Both Los Angeles and San Diego real- cps""�W DE
ize,over objections, the need to strengthen k e
the 5-year permits to curtail storm water DS EST "�W
pollution discharging into our harbors and 'U'IpAREs
coastal waters. The Santa Ana Regional ® •i n.iy �rMaigys
Board is bowing In the majority of cities,
who are"committed to water quality as
long as it does not cost them money".The Orange County is unique in that the 21 Would not think it necessary,would you.
building industry is loudly against any cities served by OCSD own their sewer collet- CoastKeeper supports this first ever per-
strongerpermit as it may cost developers tion systems(pipes)—not the sanitation dis- mit in California and applauds the
more, trier.In past years,there has not been a good Regional Board for doing the right thing
The environmental community is the handle to force the cities to maintain their here. This permit is up for adoption
only voice advocating tougher standards sewage collection systems. OCSD has offered early this year.
and more inspections from the County and to pay 50%of the expense in repairing these Irvine Ranch Water District has
Cities. Ty—stems—me cities claim they do not even obtained special legislation
Congratulations11 In 2001,we broke ave t eir 50%share. Obviously, maintaining (CoastKeeper supported)to include in
the record for the highest number of sewage pipes has not been a priority for their list
sewage spills over previous years. Most decades. of services the management of storm
sewage spills are caused by restaurants The Santa Ana Regional Board has pro- water runoff in their 152 square miles of
with no grease traps in their sewer lines or posed a new NPDES permit applicable to any service area. That really means they can
tree roots growing into sewage lines. city that owns a sewer collection system, but plan smrm water runoff management
Sewage backs up the manhole into the no treatment facility.The purpose is to give facilities in both new development areas,
street and proceeds in go into the storm the Regional Board an enforcement tool to as well as older built-out cities.
drain.From there,it is a short distance to force cities to do theirjob—maintain their-
This will include building bio-filtration OCSD is by far the largest sewage treat- There am large coastal development proj-
basins along parks and flood control chan- ment facility in the entire country operating ects that will come up for approval this year
nels to"treat"urban and storm water runoff on a"waiver". The waiver has been possible -Marblehead in San Clemente and The
in the older built-out cities. The legislation due to OCSD's long discharge pipe-4.5 miles. Headlands in Dana Point. CoastKeeper has
also allows the District to charge ratepayers We have been told in the past,there is no met with both developers and made recom-
for the service.In our strong opinion, problem,as the sewage plume will not come mendations to the water quality portions of
Developers must pay their fair share by close to shore and impact swimmers. Studies the projects. Both projects have incorpomt-
installing natural treatment facilities on their this past year and"uncovered"earlier studies ed our recommendations into their water
projects or pay into a fund that provides for show the"plume of pathogens"is frequently quality plans. What a difference a couple
storm water management on a more regional less than a mile from shore. The technology of years makes. Two years ago,our recom-
basis. is available,the money is available,and peo- mendations would not have been seriously
We have not seen a specific plan detail- pie ask then,"What is the issue?" considered.
ing how this is to be accomplished. It must CoastKeeper feels Orange County should These are enough to pmvoke serious
be equitable to the existing ratepayer and to be on the cutting edge of water quality protec- thought for now. I will keep this list going
new developments—not loaded to one side. tioncertainly not the largest of 34 waivers in upcoming editions. If you have any ques-
Conceptually, we support regional plan- that exist out of over 16,000 sewage treatment tions or want to discuss any of these issues
ning—it only makes good sense. facilities in the country. We must do better. further,please call me at(949)723-5424.
The Orange County Sanitation District Look for a lively campaign against the contin-
(OCSD)will decide if they are going to uation of the waiver.The ball is definitely in
once again apply for a 30Ih waiver that enli- OCSD's court to prove either an acceptable
ties them to circumvent the"law of the a temauve that uamnices NO Pathogens drs-
SEE US ON THE WEB
land" that requires treatment of all dis- charged into the ocean,or go to full second- __ _
charged sewage to at least a secondary level. ary treatment wt tsm ecnon. o' a g
rlieP Ple are C/ry BOARD L--K
p GEp�
Mayor V CouONST NCEU
CMRISTOPMER A LOWE Q NORMAN ZE UNDERNILL
NORMAN Z ECKENRODE
CFly Adm/nls r SCOTT P.BRADY
ROBERT D'AMATO ✓ ' JUDY A.DICKINSON
'�.AYEPM♦CRT
40f Easl Chapman Avenue-P/ecende, Cefi ,,91970
January 28, 2002
Blake Anderson, General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear General Manager Anderson:
I want to take this opportunity to thank you for inviting me to be a part of the Orange
County Leadership Symposium held in Lake Arrowhead. I enjoyed the opportunity to
get to know other elected local government officials. I would also like to apologize for
the fact that a Council meeting on Tuesday precluded me from attending the final 'wrap
up" meeting.
As I mentioned in my introduction on the first day, it was an honor to be a part of the
Symposium and I felt it was a strong step in the right direction for our county. In my
opinion, you and the rest of the planning committee demonstrated true leadership by
having the confidence and comfort to bring our various boards together.
My only suggestion for the Symposium would be to engage the group in a local vision
and !ssuc d!scuss!cn. ! vtould have enjoyed an open dialog on some of the key regional
issues our different Boards are dealing with. I know there is sensitivity to the Brown Act,
but I still believe under the right circumstances we could have had a healthy
conversation about Orange County's future.
I used to work for a man who would say, "You have to sail beyond the site of friendly
ports in order to discover new lands." Thank you for giving us an opportunity to work
together and for having the courage to discover new opportunities.
Sincerely,
Chris Lowe,
Mayor
CUjld
UPCOMING SEMINARS
held at:
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
All seminars begin at 11:00 a.m.
Map and seminar updates available at www.sccwrp.org
U Friday,February 1,2002:
Adrenal and Sex Steroid Evolution:
Environmental Implications
Dr.Michael Baker
University of California, San Diego
Friday,March 1, 2002:
Remote sensing of the Coastal Zone:
Applications of Aerial and Satellite Imaging
for Resource Monitoring and Mappinga
Dr.Jan Svejovsky and
Dr.Larry Dysher
Ocean Imaging
Friday,April 5,2002: —�
Assessment of Risk Associated with
Body-Contact Recreation
Dr.Marylyn Yates
University of California, Riverside
Friday,May 3,2002:
Update on Marine Life
Protection Acts
John z
Californiaalif Fishish and Game
r
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
www.ocsd.com
REGULAR MEETING
February 27, 2002—7:00 p.m.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than
72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda Rem are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation
District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please
navigate to the Board of Directors section.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, R any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, If necessary
5. Item removed
6. Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or
matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the spec item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to three minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
02/27/02
Page 2
7. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on
January 23, 2002 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 01115/02 01/31/02
Totals $4,257.294.08 $15.001,835.49
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member,there will be no separate discussion of these
items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items
removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar
not specifically removed from same, as follows:
a. (1) Receive and file petition from Allen Brian requesting annexation of 1.343
acres to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Rangeview Drive
in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 02-03, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to
the District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-22-Brian Annexation).
b. Receive and file Summons and Complaint re Brown and Caldwell v. Orange
County Sanitation District, et. al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case
No. C-02-0033,and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the
interests of the District.
02/27/02
Page 3
C. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100536.013, issued to OCB
Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of
$10,000, for a total amount not to exceed $110,000, providing for additional
copying services.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re February 27, 2002 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on January 23, 2002 to be filed.
C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering
Committee re the February 27, 2002 meeting.
d. Verbal report by Chair of Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee re January 24, 2002
meeting.
e. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION
REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Urban Runoff Ad
Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2002 to be filed.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re the February 6, 2002 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 6, 2002 to be filed.
C. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Black and Veatch to provide
engineering services for the design and installation support of Primary Clarifier
Drive Replacement, Job No. 132-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation,
Job No. SP-73, for an amount not to exceed $353,000.
d. Award a sole source contract with Hill Brothers Chemical Company for the
Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, for the period of March 18, 2002
through June 30, 2002,for an estimated amount not to exceed $95,000.
02/27/02
Page 4
e. Approve additional funding for Cooperative Projects for FY2001-02 Phase II
related to inflow and infiltration reduction in the amount of$3,480,206, increasing
the total FY2001-02 funding amount from $2,555,213 to$6,035,419, as
recommended by the Guidance Review Committee.
f. Approve an increase in Cooperative Projects funding for sewer rehabilitation
work with Sunset Beach Sanitary District, Contract No. CP-0118, in the amount
of$21,920, increasing the project from $47,800 to an amount not to exceed
$69,720.
g. (1) Suspend the payment of$15,500 per month for an escrow extension into an
account(ADAM431)with First American Title Company for lost opportunity
compensation during the performance of due diligence on ICOR; and (2)
Continue to conduct due diligence research of the ICOR site for the use as a
biosolids composting option.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the
February 7, 2002 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
February 7, 2002 to be filed.
C. Accept Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation,Job No. SP2000-41,with Olsson
Construction Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job
No. SP19990022,with MVP Commercial, Inc., authorizing an addition of$7,215,
increasing the total contract amount to$93,715; and (2)Accept Tenant
Improvements to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022, as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement with MVP Commercial, Inc.
e. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$190,000 to Junction Structure Upgrade,
Job No. SP2000-29, for a total budget of$472,200; and (2) Ratify Change Order
No. 1 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, with Mike Prlich and
Sons, Inc., authorizing an addition of$163,552.97 and a time extension of 44
days, increasing the total contract amount to$352,252.97.
f. Approve Addendum No. 10 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons
Engineering Science, Inc.,for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job
No. J-42, providing additional engineering services for reinvention idea
benefit/cost evaluation for an additional amount of$106,218, increasing the total
amount not to exceed $9,468,816.
g. Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown
and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job
02/27/02
Page 5
No. P1-37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of
$1,602,797 for a total amount not to exceed $5,205,904.
h. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,
Job No. 132-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (2)Authorize the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Landscape and
Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84.
I. Approve a sole source purchase order with OCB for reprographics services for
Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, in the amount of
$200,000.
j. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$2,480,000 for a total budget of
$36,186,000 for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; and (2)
Approve Addendum No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4,
providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of
$237,567, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,205,475.
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee re the February 13, 2002 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 13, 2002 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2002.
d. Receive and file the Mid-Year Financial Report for the period ending
December 31, 2001.
e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period October 1,2001 through December 31, 2001.
f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-04, Establishing a Business Mentor Program In
Cooperation with the Orangewood Children's Foundation.
g. Adopt Resolution No. 02-05,Adopting Policies and Procedures for Establishing
the District's Written Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy, SAFETY-POL-
101, and Subsequent Safety Policies Named Therein.
h. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-06, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,
Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for
immediate reinstatement of a Safety Supervisor classification at pay range El
($65,164-$92,192).
02/27/02
Page 6
16. Authorize the General Manager to execute contract amendments to the existing"As
Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreements"with Southern California
Edison, as follows, providing for the method of payment by Edison of money owned to
the District for power sold to Edison from November 2000 through March 2001,in a form
approved by General Counsel:
• Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1 to
Power Purchase Agreement—QFlD 2640(for Plant 1). including Conditional
Release and Waiver
• Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1 to
Power Purchase Agreement—QFlD 1098 (for Plant 2), including Conditional
Release and Waiver
17. Approve plans and specifications for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls,
Job No. J-39, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1
to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and
Recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Connolly-Pacific Company for
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for an amount not to exceed
$4,873.000.
18. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re January 14, 2002 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meetings held on January 14, 2002 and January 28,
2002 to be filed.
C. Approve Professional Services Agreement between Orange County Water
District and Montgomery Watson Harza to provide construction management
services for four years for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job
No. J-36,for a total amount not to exceed $10,993,038,with Orange County
Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares not to
exceed $5,496,519.
d. Approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development,
Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job
No. J-36, and the Green Acres Project between the Orange County Sanitation
District and the Orange County Water District, in a form approved by General
Counsel.
02/27/02
Page 7
19.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes
final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures
of information.
a. Convene in dosed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re existing litigation, Orange County
Sanitation District, at al.v. County of Kem, at al., Tulare County
Superior Court Case No. 189564. (Government Code Section 54956.9)
2. Confer with General Counsel re existing litigation,Train, at al. v.
Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court
Case No. OOCC05306. (Government Code Section 54956.9)
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
22. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for
March 27, 2002.
23. Adjournment
02/27/02
Page 8
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14
days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal
communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
714 952-2411, ext. 7130
G:\wp.db\admin\BSWgenda\022702 draft agendaAm
1
4
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 233 2002
OJa� SANITgl� 9
2 U 9
� ea
0
Fcr'N� E EN`��
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 2
01/23/02
t
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on January 23, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill
X Shirley McCracken,Vice Chair Tom Daly
X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd John Larson
X Brian Brady Darryl Miller
X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman
X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall
A Brian Donahue David Shawver
X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer
A John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall
X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt
X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley
X Beth Krom Greg Smith
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy
X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff
X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams
X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow
A Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary; Bob Ghireili; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten;
Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Mike Moore; Juanita Skillman
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel;Alternate Director Alberta Christy;
Irwin Haydock;Jan Vandersloot;Terry Lane; Larry Porter, Randy Fuhnnan; Joey Racano;
Dennis Baker, Doug Korthoff; Don McGee; Chris Hillman;Art Perry; Curtis Zvodny; Paul
Skager;David Wielenga
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 3
r 01/23/02
3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the
following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Aaencv Active Director Alternate Director
Fountain Valley Laurann Cook' Larry R. Crandall
La Palma Paul Walker' Kenneth Blake
Newport Beach Tod Ridgeway` Gary Adams
Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
Stanton Brian Donahue' David Shawver
Midway City
Sanitary District Joy L. Neugebauer Grace Epperson
5. NOMINATIONS AND ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR
The Chair announced that the office of Vice Chair had been vacated by a change in Board
representation and that election of a new Vice Chair would, therefore, be in order.
It was then moved: That Directors Shirley McCracken and Brian Brady be nominated as
candidates for the office of Vice Chair. There being no other nominations, a motion was made,
seconded and duly carried to close nominations. The vote was then polled by written ballot,
following which the Board Secretary announced that Director McCracken had been elected Vice
Chair by a vote of 14/8.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed thelf opposition to
the waiver: Doug Korthoff; Irwin Haydock; Curtis Zvodny; Larry Porter; Jan Vandersloot; Don
McGee; Joey Racano; Chris Hillman.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Eckenrode reported that he and Director Silva attended the CASA Conference held
January 16-19'in Palm Springs. He recommended the Directors to attend the next CASA
conference which would be held April 30'-May 3n' at Yosemite.
Mr. Eckenrode also reported on a meeting held on January 22nd at Irvine Ranch Water District
(IRWD)with Wayne Nestri, the new EPA Region IX administrator. This meeting offered an
opportunity to discuss issues of importance to local agencies. Participants Included
representatives from the Orange County Water District, IRWD and the County of Orange.
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 4
01/23/02
v
P
It was announced that committee appointments were being reviewed and announcements of
assignments would be made soon.
Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that if they left the Board Room during the meeting for
conflict of interest or similar purposes during a vote,they must notify the Board Secretary or
other minute taker that their action should be reflected in the minutes. Otherwise, temporarily
leaving the room will not be noted in the minutes.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The Directors were presented with the District's new public information video that would be used
as a tool for the speakers' bureau. Every Director and council member would be receiving
copies of the video, as well as cable television stations, city managers and public libraries. The
Directors requested some of the language be re-stated regarding the method of how the
Directors become members of the Board and projected costs should the District go to full
secondary treatment of its effluent. Directors also requested that the video, when modified, be
given to local colleges.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported on the County of Orange assessment appeals
case that could have adverse financial impacts to local cities, agencies and special districts.
The lawsuit is the result of the Assessment Appeals Board ruling in favor of a property owner
over a $100 assessment/tax bill, whereby the County saw fit to sue which in turn gave the
property owner the opportunity to cross-complain. The cross-complaint is for declaratory relief
and includes a petition to turn it into a class action lawsuit. This has the potential to develop into
a few hundred thousand plaintiffs to the lawsuit involving millions of dollars. The Board of
Supervisors recently decided that it was not going to take any legal action to appeal or to file a
Writ with the Court of Appeal, but the County Assessor could if he chose to. Mr.Woodruff
stated he would keep the Directors apprised on the issue as it continues to develop.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held December 19, 2001 be deemed
approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/01 12/31l01
Totals $5,896.761.03 $6,196,694.66
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 5
01/23/02
i
Director Boyd abstained on Warrant No. 40845. Director Leyes abstained on Warrant Nos.
40622 and 40994. Director Patterson abstained on Warrant No.40732. Directors Debbie Cook
and Laurann Cook abstained.
CONSENT CALENDAR
10. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a second time extension
of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0020, with the
City of Seal Beach.
b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Receive and file petition from
Vahe Hovnanian requesting annexation of 0.577 acres to the District in the
vicinity of Highcltff Drive and Miramar Circle in the unincorporated area of Orange
County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No.OCSD 02-01, authorizing initiation of
proceedings to annex said territory to the District(Proposed Annexation No.
OCSD-23-Hovnanian Annexation).
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve agreement for
reimbursement with the Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD) providing
for payment of$75,000 to OCFCD as a deposit for Protection of Newland Street
Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 11-14, in conjunction with OCFCD's
improvements to the Huntington Beach Channel from Magnolia Street to
Newland Avenue.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the January 23, 2002 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
November 28, 2001 to be filed.
13. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the January 9, 2002 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 9, 2002 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of December 2001.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-
02, A Resolution of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District
Adopting Policies and Procedures for District's Records Management Program,
Minutes for Board Meeting ,
Page 6
01/23/02
r
Records Retention,and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing
Resolution No. OCSD 00-26
14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify use of General Manager's
emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No.
30319, issued to Matrix Engineering Services,for a total amount not to exceed
$200,000; and Purchase Order No. 31251 issued to Techno Coatings for a total amount
not to exceed $130,000, for Emergency Repair of the Low Pressure Digester Gas Holder
Tank at Treatment Plant No. 2,for a total amount not to exceed $330,000; and,
FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: The motion be amended to
include authorizing issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 30319,
issued to Matrix Engineering Services, for an additional amount of$80,000, for
additional repairs, and authorize issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No.
31251 issued to Techno Coatings for an additional amount of$20,000,for a total amount
for the emergency repairs not to exceed $430,000.
15. Blake Anderson, General Manager, gave a slide presentation reviewing the issues
related to urban runoff diversion, and the arguments and advantages of expanding the
current charter for the District.
The Directors then entered into discussion on the benefits and liability of expanding the
charter.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Counsel to prepare
draft legislation to expand the agency's charter to include permissive language
authorizing the diversion and management of dry weather urban runoff flows and to
pursue legislation through the California Legislature.
16. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson,
representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee, re the meeting held on January 14, 2002.
The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 10, 2001 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Find that pursuant to California
Environment Quality Act Guidelines Section 15164, that some minor changes or
additions to the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
(EIR/EIS)on the Groundwater Replenishment System certified in March 1999,
are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code
Section 21166 and/or in Section 15162 have occurred that would require the
preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative
Declaration; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the EIR/EIS prepared by
Environmental Science Associates.
' Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 7
01/23/02
17. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
54956.9 and 54956.9(c): The Board convened In closed session at 9:01 p.m., pursuant
to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9(c),to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 17
(a)(1), (2) and (3). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section
54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re
Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1)and (3). A report of the action taken will be publicly reported
at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(2).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 9:30 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular
session.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Azoa
Secretary o tl er Board of qi ctors of
Orange Counly Sanitati060istrid
GAw ft %dmin%BSW1nuWs1012302 draft minutm.dm
Claims Paid From 12101/01 to 12115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
40591 Air Products It Chemicals $ 25,039.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89
40592 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 111,949.84 Professional Services J-73-2
40593 Black&Veatch Corporation 321,868.77 Professional Services P146,J-77
40594 Brown&Caldwell 185.682.15 Professional Services P1.98
40595 BP Energy Company 135.311.15 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28
40596 FileNET Corporation 25.834.40 Software Maintenance
40597 Kernm n Pacific, Inc. 95.092.95 Ferric Chlorlde MO 9-27-95
40598 Lee&Ro,Inc. 52,457.73 Professional Services J-71-7,P2-39&P247-1
40599 Orange County Water District 434,686.51 GWRS Joint Project-J-36
406DO Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 80,943.42 Engineering Services J-42
40601 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 146.702.65 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
40602 Southern California Edison 67.600.66 Power
40603 Tetra Tech, Inc. 67.296.09 Professional Services-Warner Avenue Relief Sewer
40804 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 126,345.78 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
40605 U.S.Peroxide 59,008.25 Professional Services&Chemicals-SP-90
40606 UC Riverside 60,000.00 Professional Services-Biotrickling Test
40607 Waste Markets Corp. 32,178.50 Maintenance Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal
40608 The Vaklma Company 78,381.27 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
40609 Ken Thompson,Inc. 651.325.00 Construction 546 MO 6-27-01
40610 Action Instruments 1.049.79 Electrical Supplies
40611 Action Instruments r/o Goldn.State Chid. 1.398.73 Electrical Supplies
40612 Air Liquids America Corp. 987.79 Specialty Gasses
40613 Airborne Express 39.57 Air Freight
40614 Airgas Safety 758.82 Safety Equipment
40615 Appleone Employment Service 766.90 Temporary Employment Services
40616 Aquatic Bioassay AM Consulting Labs,Inc. 1.850.00 Toxicity Testing
40617 Ark Construction Company 18,234.50 Construction-Enclose Open Bay at Pit. 1 Warehouse Storage Area
40618 Asbury Environmental Services 275.00 Waste Oil Removal
40618 ABBE American Sm.of Safety Engineers 645.00 Safety&Emergency Response Meeting Registration
40620 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,366.55 Long Distance Telephone Service
40621 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 86.37 Telephone Service
40622 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,825.68 Cellular Telephone Service
40623 Battery Specialties 348.30 Batteries
40624 Brenntag West, Inc. 995.56 Janitorial Supplies
40825 Bush&Associates,Inc. 6,850.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97
40626 California Automatic Gate 110.00 Service Agreement
40627 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor
40628 Camillo Engineers 4,489.00 Professional Services P1-60,P2.60
40629 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1279.23 Copier Lease
40630 City of Irvine 7,200.00 Manhole Grading-Campus Drive,Irvine
40631 City of La Habra 4,771.50 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73
40632 Coast Fire Equipment 503.90 Service Agreement
40633 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 27.95 Stationery&Office Supplies
40634 Myers Power Products, Inc. 86.52 Computer Supplies
40635 Comus International 160.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
Claims Paid From 12f01f01 to 12/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40636 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 1,065.96 Electrical Supplies
40637 Cooper Energy Services 310A7 Engine Supplies
40638 Core laboratories,Inc. 500.00 Lab Analyses
40639 Corporate Express Imaging 86.26 Computer Supplies
40640 Corporate Express 1.277.86 Office Supplies
40641 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 591.13 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40642 County Wholesale Electric Co. 14,703.95 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
40643 Crane America Services,Inc. 696.67 Contractor Damage Repairs
40544 CASA 300.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration
40645 CMAA 200.00 Membership-Construction Management Assoc.of America
40846 CSMFO 2001 Annual Conference 725.00 Aocoun irg Meeting Registration
40647 CWEA Membership 308.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
40648 CWEA-TCP 91.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
40649 Del Mar Ani lylical 2,107.00 Blosolids Analysis
40650 DeZudk c/o MlscofSouthWest 1.493.18 Valves
40651 Diamond H Recognition 220.78 Employee Service Awards
40652 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 463.80 Stationery 8 Office Supplies
40653 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 213.26 Paint Supplies
40654 Electna-Bond 24,354.88 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40655 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
40856 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 102.53 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies
40657 Expenune 6D3.00 Software Upgrade
40658 FedEx Corporation 114.67 Air Freight
4065E Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,539.92 Lab Supplies
40680 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company 20,525.41 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium
40661 Franklin Covey -128.66 Offs Supplies
40662 Fr/s Electronics 124.59 Computer Supplies
40663 City of Fullerton 254.61 Water Use
4DS64 FLW,Inc. 494.31 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40665 FM International,Inc 11,048.22 Professional Services 3.25.1
40666 Ganshl Lumber Company 75.24 Lumber/Hardware
40667 General Petroleum 8.574.63 Unleaded Gasoline
40668 Gierlich-Mkchell, Inc. 1.727.53 Belt Filter Press Supplies
40669 Gold Systems,Inc. 12,312.50 Professional Services-Date Migration 6 STORET Interface Application
40670 Government Finance Officers Association 55.00 Publication
40671 W W Grainger, Inc. 667.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40672 Graphic Distributors 57.62 Photographic Supplies
40673 Graybar 844.97 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40674 Robert Greene 1.034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40675 H F Scientific 129.65 Lab Supplies
40676 Hach Jo Ponton Industries 986.42 Instrument Pans&Supplies
40677 Huntngton Industrial Plastics,Inc. 977.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40678 Holmes 8 Narver,Inc. 3.486.57 Professional Services Pl44 8 P2.53
40679 Voided Check -
40680 Hani Houranl 162.37 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40681 City of Huntington Beach 18,788.09 Water Use
Claims Paid From 12/01/01 to 12/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40682 Imaging Plus, Inc. 2,765.34 Printing Service
40683 Industrial Distribution Group 1,837.69 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
40684 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 289.56 Lab Parts&Supplies
40685 Interstate Battery Systems 742.07 Batteries
40686 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,361.17 Instrument Supplies
40687 Iran Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 290.00 Offstle Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server
40688 J&L Industrial Supply 1,764.01 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
40689 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 767.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40690 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services, Inc. 107.50 Maintenance Agreement-Fuel Management System
4GB91 Voided Check -
40692 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 960.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
40693 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,625.00 FIS Support Services
40694 Ms.R.Krueger 81.57 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40695 Lab Support 759.00 Temporary Employment Services
40696 Lexis-Nexis 23.78 Books&Publications
40697 Richard L.Longwith 858.41 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40698 Manatt,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy
40699 MarVac Electronics 131.83 Electrical Pans&Supplies
40700 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 863.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40701 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc, 1,516.80 Mechanical Pars&Supplies
40702 John Meulmesler 1.034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40703 Michael's Stores,Inc. 64.37 Custom Framing&Graphic Supplies
40704 Midway Mfg&Machining Go. 15,123.74 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
40705 Mlllitronics Go RMB Engineering 1.736.08 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance
40706 Mission Uniform Service 4,319.70 Uniform Rentals
40707 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 15,441.60 Lab Services
40708 MCR Tmirnologles,Inc. 794.05 Electrical Pans&Supplies
40709 MSA CIO Mag Systems 243.26 Instrument Maint.Services
40710 National Plant Services,Inc. 1,787.50 Vacuum Truck Services
40711 Neal Supply Co. 4,246.25 Discharge Valve Replacement at Seal Beach Pump Station
40712 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Administrative Services Training Registration
40713 Newark Electronics 47.55 Instrument Supplies
40714 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 17.974.51 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO&24-98
40715 The Norco Companies 155.20 Mail Delivery Service
40716 Norms;Refrigeration 264.58 Electric Parts
40717 Orange County Winwater Works 143.94 Mechanical Tools&Supplies
40718 OfBm Depot Business Services Div. 398.62 Office Supplies
40710 Olsson Construction,Inc. 2.430.00 Constmction-Installation of High Rate Chopper Pump on Digester R
40720 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 1,232.89 Electrical Pars&Supplies
40721 Orange County Hose Company 264.62 Hydraulic Hose Supplies
40722 Orange Valves&Filling Company, 303.69 Fillings
40723 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Service Agreement
40724 Oxygen Service Company 148.40 Specialty Gases
40725 OCS Reprographics 5.952.87 Printing Service-MO 1/26100
40725 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equlpment Make.
40727 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 715.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies
Para 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 12/01/01 to 12115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40728 Pacific Bell 43.67 Telephone Services
40729 Pacific Bell Intemet Services 324.00 Internet Service
40730 Pacific Mechanical Supply _ 1,940.67 Plumbing Supplies
40731 Parts Unlimited 242.42 Truck&Aida Supplies
40732 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 21,596.00 Construction-Saver Lateral Repairs
40733 Pictometry International Corp. 22,413.76 Shcware,Licensing,Installation&Training
40734 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 24,715.68 Sodium Hypochlorile
40735 Polydyne.Inc. 13,317A6 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
40736 Power Pumps,Inc. 302.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40737 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium
40738 Projects Partners 21,043.01 Temporary Employment Services
40739 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 3.273.38 Pumps
40740 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service
40741 PWERPIMCC-South Coast L.L.C. 11,499.09 Reconciliation User Fee Program
40742 COOS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service
40743 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kam County Blosolids Consulting Services
40744 Red Wing Shoes 73.53 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
40745 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,333.78 Employee Life Insurance Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer
40746 Kenley Ries 1,374.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40747 Craig Rose 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40746 RPM Electric Motors 7,700.05 Mechanical Repairs
40749 Eugene C Schluter Jr. 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40750 Schwing America,Inc. 72.36 Pump Supplies
40751 Sears Industrial Sales 78.86 Instrument Parts&Supplies
40752 Seavenlums 5,250.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
40753 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 694.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40754 Sigma Chemical Co. 2,648.71 Lab Parts&Supplies
40756 SoflCholce 4,066.40 Software
40756 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 4,202.78 Permit Fees for Retrofit of Caustic Scrubbers&Biotrickling Filters
40757 Steven Enterprises.Inc. 62.06 Stationery&Office Supplies
40758 Summit Steel 185.29 Metal
40759 SUN-SRI 339.87 Lab Parts&Supplies
40760 Sunset Industrial Parts 725.31 Plumbing&Electrical Paris&Supplies
40761 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 2,298.00 Lab Analytical Service
40762 Textile Engineering Associates 1,599.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40763 The Lewis Group 23,677.11 Consulting Service-Project Management Process
40764 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,869.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40785 Thmedom 2,316.64 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40766 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,478.00 Elevator Maintenance
40767 Daily Pilot 262.50 Notices&Ads
40768 Tags Lock&Safe Service&Sales 176.15 Locks&Keys
40769 Then Consulting Engineers 8,854.00 Engineering Services 7-21&1-17
40770 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8.440.00 Contract Groundakeeping MO 5.11-94
40711 Tnresdail Laboratories,Inc. 2,010.00 Lab Services
40772 Tyco Valves&Controls L.P. 10,625.30 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40773 7eksystems 4.264.00 Temporary Employment Services
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 12/01/01 to 12/15/O1
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40774 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,401.38 Lab Service Agreement-Water Purification System
40775 The Unisouroe Corporation 6,806.02 Office Supplies
40776 Naval Post Graduate School 1,742.11 Professional Services J-85
40777 Valley Cities Supply Company 224.89 Plumbing Supplies
40778 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 11.600.00 Temporary Employment Service
40779 Vedzon California 809.70 Telephone Services
40780 Veme's Plumbing 97.50 Plumbing Equipment Service
40781 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 18,590.13 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
40782 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5.433.81 Lab Parts&Supplies
40783 Waters Corporation 1,231.15 Lab Parts&Supplies
40784 IMRI 4,400.00 Temporary Employment Services
40785 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 801.63 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40786 Xerox Corporation 8,274.18 Copier&Fax Leases
40787 Zee Medlwl 2.043.74 First Aid Supplies
40788 Blake Anderson 300.16 MeetingRreining Expense Reimbursement
40789 Shabbir S.Basrai 189.20 Mesting/imining Expense Reimbursement
40790 CSMFO 2001 Annual Conference 225.00 Accounting Meeting Registration
40791 Frank A.Leong 474.11 Meetingfrraming Expense Reimbursement
40792 Hal Nguyen 476.30 MeetingRmining Expense Reimbursement
40793 George L Robertson 792.69 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement
40794 Ken A.Sakamotc 135.40 Meeting?mining Expense Reimbursement
40795 Donald S.Van Voorst 459.84 Meeting/rmintng Expense Reimbursement
40796 Joven E.Alop 2.889.04 Employee Computer Loan Program
40797 Jose L.Erodes 798.20 Employee Computer Loan Program
40798 Janet L.Gray 1,994.30 Employee Computer Loan Pmgmm
40799 David P.Halverson 1,500.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
40800 Henry Lorimer and CompUSA 2,89029 Employee Computer Loan Program
40801 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees
40802 Louie Eroles and eBargainEleclronics.com 116.10 Employee Computer Loan Progmm
408M Louie Erodes and MICROTIX 1.100.66 Employee Computer Loan Program
40804 RPIIBio Gro 49.022-25 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
40805 Church Mutual Insurance 35,000.00 Claim Settlement
40806 IPI GrammTech,Inc. 33.000.00 Software Maint.Agreement
40807 Orange County Sanitation District 625,892.96 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
40808 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 40,695.85 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
40809 Rwan&Tucker L.L.P. $2,087.32 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
40810 Symitm Technologies,Inc. 72,178.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-2945
40811 Orange County Sanitation District 33,216.46 Worker's Comp.Reimb.
40812 Asaro Company 1,564.00 Safety Supplies
40813 Airgas Safety 350.18 Safety Supplies
40814 American Airlines 3.595.84 Travel Services
40815 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 26.75 Telephone Service
40816 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment
40817 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
40818 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 328.54 Electrical Supplies
40819 CASA 300.00 Communications Meeting Registration
Page 5 of 7 `
Claims Paid From 12/01/01 to 12/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40820 CRBR.Inc. 848.92 Container Rentals
40821 CWEA-TCP 33.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
40822 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
4DB23 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
40824 Home Depot 221.87 Small Hardware
40825 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Loral 501 1,531.17 Dues Deduction
40826 Irvine Ranch Water District 7.08 Water Use
40827 IONIA,Inc. 225.63 Publication
40828 J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company 3,825.00 Information Technology Training Registration
40829 Law Offices of Klnkle.Rodger 8 Spriggs 4,809.70 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
40830 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 514.74 Plumbing 8 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40831 Mulliforce Systems Corp. 7,764.00 Computer Maintenance-Hardware/Software
40832 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
40833 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1,618.12 Fittings
40834 OCEA 448.07 Dues Deduction
40835 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
40836 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
40837 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction
40838 Chadeen Powers 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
40839 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 5,004.50 Video Production Service
40840 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 2,021.15 Tools 8 Mechanical Supplies
40841 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1.358.80 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40842 Blanton.Larsen 8 Marsh 1,241.80 Professional Services-AMSA Law Seminar Re Watershed Issues
40843 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
4DB44 So.Col.Gas Company 14,082.60 Natural Gas
40845 Southern California Edison 8.191.63 Power
40846 Stale Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4.242.50 COP Trustee Services
4D847 SARBS-CWFA 20.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc.
40848 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 109.58 Mechanical Supplies
40849 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
40850 Utility Communicators International 350.00 Membership
40851 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10,240.00 Temporary Employment Service
40852 Venom California 2.329.96 Telephone Services
40853 Weather Services International 3,459.00 Software Main.-Weather for Windows
40854 IMRI 4,255.00 Temporary Employment Services
40855 World Citrus West 2,027.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
40856 Xerox Corporation 5,126.70 Copier 8 Fax Leases
40857 Angela D.Ball 407.50 Meeti g77ralning Expense Reimbursement
40858 Patrick B.Carnahan 568.33 Meelig772ining Expense Reimbursement
40859 Fred J.O'Brien 913.86 Meating/Rainlrg Expense Reimbursement
40860 Jeffrey T. Read 625.35 Meeting7l-raining Expense Reimbursement
40861 Jean E.Tappan 116.67 Meelirg?raining Expense Reimbursement
40862 Michael I.Zedek 478.41 Meeting/raining Expense Reimbursement
40863 Concord Escrow 20,000.00 Newport Beach Property Purchase
40864 Orange County Sanitation District 442.14 Patty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants 3 4,470,988.09
Page 6 of 7
Claims Paid From 12/01/01 to 12/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Payroll Dlabursements
25049.25214 Interim Paychecks $ 315,037.57 Annual Payouts
25215-25215 Interim Paycheck $ 1.010.08 Name Correction
25216-25300 Employee Paychecks $ 178,540.24 Biweekly Payroll 12/12/01
25361 -25W Interim Paychecks 10.041.77 Annual Payouts 8 Adjustments
67690-68142 Direct Deposit Statements 756,980.06 Biweekly Payroll 12J12/01
Total Payroll Disbursement$ $ 1,261,609.72
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas $ 112.094.55 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas 52,068.67 November Interest Payment on Sense 1993 Certificates of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164,163.22
Total Claims Paid 12/01/01 -12/15/01 $ 5,898,781.03
Page 7 of 7 '
Claim Paid From 12116/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
40865 ADS Environmental Services.Inc. $ 110.682.77 Professional Services J-73-2
40866 Blue Cross of California 224,447.88 Medical Insurance Premium
40867 Boyle Engineering Corporation 96.753.63 Professional Services 1.2-4,6-13
40868 Brown 8 Caldwell 69,223.30 Professional Services 241
408M Carollo Engineers 417.734.05 Professional Services P2-66 8 Microfiltralion Demonstration Scale Project
40870 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 91.248.15 (40)Computers 8 Hardware
40871 Della Dental _ 51,581.37 Dental Insurance Plan
40872 Legal Section Div.of Standards Enforcement 35,893.30 Construction J-31-3,Release of Slop Notice
40873 Heat Technology Products 51,873.27 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40874 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33.226.80 Medical Insurance Premium
40B75 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 80,528.72 Feric Chloride MO 9-27-95
40876 Mike Prlich 8 Sons 343.874.81 Construction-Repairs to Force Main at Bitter Point Pump Station
40877 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 53,456.62 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99
40878 OBE Technologies,Inc. 73,906.25 Business Objects Infoview Server License 8 Support
40879 Polydyne.Inc. 33,345.28 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
40OW Projects Partners 39,597.98 Temporary Employment Services
40881 Southern California Edison 47.721.49 Power
40882 Southern California Edison 51,074.64 Power
40883 Tula RanchrMagan Farms 112,762.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
40684 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 74,136.13 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
40885 The Yakima Company 34.853.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
40886 Ark Construction Company 35,995.50 Construction PI-62
40887 Castillo Western Industrial Conslrucrors 25,641.18 Construction-Clarifiers P8O Retaining Walls at Plant 2
40688 J W Contracting Corporation 152.919.00 Construction P2-60
40889 Jamison Engineering Contractors.Inc. 99.954.00 Construction 2.41-2
40890 Margate ConstruClbn,Inc. 119,431.00 Construction P2-39
40891 Southern Contracting Company 25,999.00 Construction J-33-IA
40892 A-Plus Systems 1,909.04 Notices 8 Ads
40893 Abesco 67.32 Hardware
40894 Great American Printing Co. 127.67 Stationery 8 Office Supplies
40895 Advanced Cooling Technologies 827.75 Air Conditioning Microcomputer Panel
40896 Advanced Sealing 8 Supply Co., Inc. 184.68 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies
40897 Aearo Company 2,393.00 Safety Supplies
40898 Air Liquide America Corp. 2.458.78 Specialty Gasses
40899 Airbome Express 44.69 Air Freight
40900 Airgas Safely 2,366.62 Safely Supplies
40901 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 178.72 Instrument Supplies
40902 American Society For Microbiology 324.00 Publications
40903 A rml Control Corporation 989.91 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
40904 Amrican Air Filter,Inc. 1,451.79 Filter
40905 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 735.00 Service Agreement-Peet Control
40906 Appleone Employment Service 4,804.82 Temporary Employment Services
40907 Artistic Blinds 75.00 Valance 8 Vane Repairs
40908 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 108.04 Plaques
40909 ABS Group.Inc. 927.00 Publications
Page 1 of 8 '
Claims Paid From 12/16/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40910 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 175.08 Telephone Service
40911 AWSI 249.00 Department of Transportation Testing Program
40912 Barton Instruments,L.L.C. 440.14 Electrical Pans&Supplies
40913 Battery Specialties 641.22 Batteries
40914 Bauer Compressors 3.300.18 Safety Supplies&Equipment
40915 BtoMerieux Vitek,Inc. 565.13 Lab Supplies
40916 Borthwick,Guy,Betlenhausen 6,924.32 Professional Services P2-84
40917 Brithlnee Electric 119.47 Electrical Supplies
40918 Bush&Associates, Inc. 766,00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
40919 California Auto Collision 688.39 Vehicle Repairs
40920 California Automatic Gate 126.88 Service Agreement
40921 Southern California Marine Institute 6.412,50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support
40922 Certified Labs 499.14 Lab Supplies
40923 City of Huntington Beach 920.00 Permit Fee for Busharo Trunk Sewer 1-2-4
40924 Coast Rubber Stamp Mfg. 1,5D0.70 Office Supplies
40925 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 325.14 Electrical Supplies
40926 Cooper Energy Services 522.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40927 Cooper Energy Systems 15,342.10 Mechanical Paris&Supplies
40928 Corporate Express Imaging 683.72 Computer Supplies
40929 Corporate Express 1.435.99 Office Supplies
40930 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 460.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
40931 CorDaxlBentiey Systems.Inc. 1,172.50 Software&Support
40932 Cost Containment Solutions 547.79 Worker's Comp.Services
40933 County of Orange-Auditor/CommIler 70.00 Impaction Fees for Encroachment Permit
40934 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,730.19 Electrical Pam&Supplies
40935 Crane America Services,Inc. 758.38 Crane Services
40936 Culligan of Orange County 100.70 Soft Water Service
40937 Cylec Industries 14.465.25 Anionlc Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
40938 CALPERLA 390.00 Membership-California Public Employers Labor Relations Assoc.
40939 CEPA Company 1,300.00 Lab Equipment Maim.Service
40940 Certified Insulated Products 682.08 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40941 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 1.010.00 Lab Pam&Supplies
40942 CR&R,Inc. 3,120.00 Container Rentals
40943 CWEA San Diego 305.00 O&M Meeting Registration
40944 Dapper Tire Co. 293.30 Truck Tires
40945 David's Tree Service 10,800.00 Tree Maim.Service
40946 De Guelle Glass Co.,Inc. 107.04 Safely Glass
40947 Del Mar Analytical 672.00 Biosollds Analysis
40948 Diamond H Recognition 576.85 Employee Service Awards
40949 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 177.05 Paint Supplies
40950 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 828.65 Electrical Supplies
40951 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 3,123.73 Medical Screening
40952 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 6,241.44 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-Nov.2001
40953 Enchanter,Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
40954 Envlro Products,Inc. 235.74 Ins.Parts&Supplies
40955 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,021.30 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From 12116/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
40956 FedEx Corporation 100.08 Air Freight
40957 Filarsky&Watt L.L.P. 2,707.50 Professional Services-SPMT Labor Negotiator
40M Fker Supply Company 325.59 Filters
40959 First American Real Estate Solutions _ 423.20 Orange County Property Information
40960 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,032.68 Lab Pans&Supplies
40961 Flo-Systems,Inc. 14.676.10 Pump Supplies
40962 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 493.23 Meeting Supplies
40963 Fountain Valley Camera 81.44 Photo Supplies
40964 Franklin Covey 1,509.41 Office Supplies
40965 Fry's Electronics 405.11 Computer Supplies
409M FLW,Inc. 185.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40967 Garralt-Callahan Company 586.95 Chemicals
409M General Petroleum 8.473.93 Unleaded Gasoline
40969 George Yardley Co. 1.186.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40970 Goldenwest Window Service 50.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.a990015
40971 W W Grainger,Inc. 994.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies
40972 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 701.75 Janitorial Supplies
40973 H F Scientific 86.14 Chemicals
40974 Hach do Ponlon Industries 5,263.83 Lab Para&Supplies
40975 Herb's Blackforasl Bakery&Deli 22220 Meeting Expenses
40976 Home Depot 183.48 Small Hardware
40977 Hopkins Technical Products 6,685.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40978 Hub Auto Supply 200.06 Truck Parts
40979 HI Standard Automotive 2,856.40 Automotive Supplies&Instala0on
409M HPC Technologies 3,085.00 O&M Meeting Registration
40901 L D.Industries.Inc. 349.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40982 Imaging Express 497.91 Printer Maintenance
40983 Industrial Distribution Group 1,877.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
40964 Industrial Metal Supply 15029 Metal
40985 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 19.31 Mechanical Para&Supplies
40986 Infinity Technology USA 5,009.77 Computer Supplies
40987 Interstate Battery Systems 64323 Batteries
40988 Invensys Systems,Inc. 92.65 Circular Charts
40989 Irvine Ranch Water District 49.04 Water Use
40990 Voided Check - -
40991 Jack Higgins 3,000.00 Professional Consulting Services-Business Coaching
40992 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 19,607.58 Professional Services-Manhole Location&Inspection
40993 Jana Contracting Corp. 22,268.93 Construction-Newport Beach Emergency Sewer Repairs
40994 Jays Catering 2,448.15 Meeting Expenses
40995 John's Phllly Grille 159.57 Engineering Meeting Expenses-Red Task Force Group
40996 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 8,636.65 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study
40997 Johnstone Supply 93.68 Electrical Supplies
40998 JPR Systems, Inc. 3.250.78 Mechanical Paris&Supplies
40M Karen Monaco&Associates 6.028.75 FIS Support Services
41000 Kelly Paper 348.62 Paper
41001 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 346.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
Page 3 of 8 �'
Claims Paid From 12/16/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41002 Lab Support 5,242.71 Temporary Employment Services
41003 Usbert Cassidy 1,745.00 Membership
41004 Larder Company do Gerald Jones 8,520.21 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
41005 Long Beach Una% 656.00 Truck Bed Liner
41006 Lorman Education Services 239.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration
41007 LIMS/Lefler 139.00 Subscription
41008 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 412.50 Emissions Testing
41009 Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp 582.22 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41010 McCromsler,Inc. 50943 Flow Meter Repairs
41011 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.514.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41012 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 13.013.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41013 Merck&Co.,Inc. 300.00 Publications
41014 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,0W.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study
41015 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,994.62 (2)Truck Loading Augers&Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41016 Mission Abrasive B Janitorial Supplies 120.80 Janitorial Supplies
41017 Mission Uniform Service 4,454.11 Uniform Rentals
41018 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.55 Storage Bins Rental
41019 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 650.32 Vehicle Painting
41020 MCR Technologies, Inc. 559.00 Electrical Paris&Supplies
41021 MDS Consulting %180.00 Surveying Services
41022 MGD Technologies,Inc, 4,800.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring
41023 Mine Safety Appliances Company 389.91 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41024 National Fire Protection Assoclalion 290.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration
41025 National Mlcrocomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
41026 National Plant Services,Inc. 1.650.00 Vacuum Truck Services
41027 Neal Supply Co. 452.30 Plumbing Supplies
41028 NelVereenl of Southern California 4,388.33 (2)Security Doors&Hardware
41029 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 6,028.22 Lubricant'Diesel Fuel
41030 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 3,620.W Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
41031 NCG Porter Novella 16.682.33 Professional Services•Public Relations
41032 NETSDUNelamrk Solution 3,600.00 Engineering Services-Plant 2 Retrofit Project
41033 NST Network Support Team 997.50 Intemet/Inirenet Software Support
41034 O.C.W Industrial Co. 645.02 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41035 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.290.48 Office Supplies
41036 On Line Controls 892.50 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41037 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 880.63 Fittings
41038 Oxygen Service Company 293.00 Specialty Gases
41039 OCB Reprographics 3.819.03 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00
41040 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 89.91 Air Conditioner Filter
41041 Pacific Bell 1,256.66 Telephone Services
41042 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,056.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41043 Pacific Parts&Controls 944.91 Electrical Supplies
41044 Pacific Publishers 97.00 Publication
41045 Parker Hannifin Corporation 110.60 Mechanical Supplies
41046 Parker Supply Company 4,764.27 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41047 Parts Unlimited 592.93 Truck Supplies
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 12/16/01 to 12/31/O1
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41048 Palnot Video Productions 64.50 Video Services
41049 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,125.00 Refrigerator Repairs
41050 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 14.463.11 Plumbing Pans S Supplies
41051 Plaza Copy and Imaging.L.L.C. 1,770.99 Printing
41052 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 80.60 Electrical Supplies
410M Prazair,Inc. 9.31 Lab Supplies
41054 Prawn Products 447.20 Concrete 8 Hardscape Materials
41055 Primary Source 4,165.02 Office Furniture
41056 PCS Express 110.00 Couner Service
41057 R.L.Abbott 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
41058 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2289.70 Trash Removal
41059 Regents of Univ.of California 5,T78.47 Professional Services J-85
41060 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8.439.78 Employee We Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability 8 Cancer
41061 Royal Truck Body 6.150.08 (1)8 Ft.Wilily Service Truck Body 8 Installation
41052 Ryan Hemo Products Corp. 3.523.24 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
41003 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 1.670.00 Engineering Services-Addition to Fleet Services 8 Rebuild Shop 8 HR Window
41064 RS Hughes Co.Inc. 241.64 Paint Supplies
41065 Safely-Kleen 223.75 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement
41066 Schwing America.Inc. 4,003.89 Pump Supplies
41067 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 7,312.92 Tools
41088 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 2.146.58 Mechanical Parts 3 Supplies
41069 Supeloo.Inc. 1.937.07 Lab Paris 8 Supplies
41070 Skalar,Inc. 2,822.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
41071 So.Cal.Gas Company 15,558.97 Natural Gas
41072 Sarah Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 174.80 Permll Fees for Annual Emissions,Operation 8 Misc.
41073 SPartdetts 1,792.67 Drinking Water/Coder Rentals
41074 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 115.20 Carpel Cleaning Service
41075 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Chemicals
41076 Summit Steel 56.20 Metal
41077 Sunset Industrial Parts 309.19 Plumbing Pans 8 Supplies
41078 SAW PA 6,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Are River Watershed Group
41079 SBC DalaComm 9,601.59 Cisco Software Upgrade 8 Support
41080 Southern California Edison 2.113.18 Power
41081 SPEC Services.Inc. 6,262.81 Engineering Services J-33-1
41082 Tasew.Inc. 2,799.30 Valves
41083 Taylor 8 Francis 228.80 Publication
41084 Tetra Tech,Inc. 4.423.00 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
41085 The Orange County Register 2,522.88 Notices 8 Ads
41086 Thermo Elemental 399.78 Lab Parts 8 Supplies
41087 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6.128.00 Mechanical Parts,Supplies 8 Repairs
41088 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services
41089 Daly Pilot 281.25 Notices 8 Ads
41090 Tongs Lock 8 Safe Service 6 Sales 203.60 Locks 8 Keys
41091 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 548.25 Traffic Safety Equipment Remal
41092 Tran Consulting Engineers 8.128.00 Engineering Services-Sewer Pipeline Inspection-Various Locations
41093 TransCom USA 246.40 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
Page 5of8 �'
Claims Paid From 12116/01 to 12131/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41094 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 50.00 Contract Groundskeepirg MO 5.11-94
41095 Track&Auto Supply, Inc. 124.20 Truck Supplies
41096 Truesdell Laboratodes, Inc. 360.00 Lab Services
41097 Teksystems 17,761.00 Temporary Employment Services
41098 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System
41099 U.S.Peroxide 17.783.08 Professional Services-Collection System Odor&Corrosion Control and Chemicals
41100 United Parcel Service 967.62 Parcel Services
41101 Naval Post Graduate School 11.681.02 Professional Services J-85
41102 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 19.720.00 Temporary Employment Service
41103 Vapex,Inc. 5.067.00 Computer,Hardware/Software&Support
41104 Varian Associates, Inc. 2.748.31 Lab Parts&Supplies
41105 Vedzon California 3,446.37 Telephone Services
41106 Verve's Plumbing 2.612.48 Plumbing Service
41107 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,320.96 Vision Service Premium
41108 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 2.037.77 Lab Parts&Supplies
41109 The Wackenhut Corporation 16.552.94 Security Guards
41110 Waste Markets Corp. 15,219.87 Maintenance Agreement-Got&Screenings Removal&Disposal
41111 Water Education Foundation 287.00 Sponsorship 2002-Water Environment Foundation
41112 IMRI 7,040.00 Temporary Employment Services
41113 Western City 63.00 Subscription
41114 WEF 250.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation
41115 Xerox Corporation 14.356.86 Copier&Fax Leases
41116 4 imprint Inc. 5,203.80 Priming
41117 California Bank&Trust 2.889.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention
41118 Mlke Pr ich&Sons 21.899.98 Construcllon-Juncton Structure Upgrades
41119 Puncmist Contracts 14,146.20 Construction-Purchasing Bldg.Conference Room
41120 Union Bank of California 16,991.00 Construction P2-60,Retention
41121 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 1,115.88 Mesting/fralning Expense Reimbursement
41122 Angela D.Bell 209.24 Meelinglrmining Expense Reimbursement
41123 Mark Castillo 763.84 Meeline/7mining Expense Reimbursement
41124 Fred J.O'Brien 844.15 Meeline/7raining Expense Reimbursement
41125 Ken A.Sakamoto 1,149.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
41126 Rosa L.Aguilar 920.29 Employee Computer Loan Program
41127 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 270.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration
41128 County Clerk 43.00 Annexation Fee
41129 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 2,633.57 Employee Computer Loan Program
41130 Employee Activity Committee 110.00 Service Award Expense
41131 Henry Lorimer and CompUSA 2,890.29 Employee Computer Loan Program
41132 Jahn Kavoklis&Fry's Electronics 2,129.52 Employee Computer Loan Pogram
41133 Ddaze Phuong 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Pogmm
41134 State Board of Equalization 1.200.00 Annexa8on Fee
41135 County of Orange 1.293.00 Filing Fee-Mitigated Negative Declaration,5-51
41136 American Express 25.825.91 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services
41137 IBM Corporation 73,342.95 AS/400 Lease Buyout
41138 Orange County Sanitation District 472.518.74 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
41139 Orange County Water District 720,106,48 GWRS Joint Project
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 12I16/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41140 Concord Escrow 386.000.00 Newport Beach Property Purchase,5,51
41141 Abesco 24.41 Hardware
41142 Airgas Safety 358.87 Safety Supplies
41143 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. _ $9.35 Interstate Freight
411" American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 350.00 Telephone Service
41145 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.13 Telephone Service
41146 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment
41147 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
41 W Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 540.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41149 Cam Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
41150 First American Title Company 15,500.00 Escrow Deposit for Due Diligence-Inland Composting&Organic Recycling Site
41151 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 20,525.39 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
41152 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
41153 Industrial Metal Supply 191.70 Metal
41154 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 2,563.53 Dues Deduction
41155 lab Safety Supply,Inc. 329.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41155 Luccys 11625 Meeting Expense
41157 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 157.38 Mechanical Pants&Supplies
41158 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
41159 OCEA 458.12 Dues Deduction
41160 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
41161 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
41162 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction
41163 Pmpipe 8,936.25 Sewedine Cleaning&CCTV Inspection-Balboa
41164 RS Hughes Cc, Inc. 241.40 Paint Supplies
41155 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
41165 Sy Nielson Service,Inc. 816.00 Lab Calibration Service
41167 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 6,825.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41168 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
41169 Varian,Inc. 2,000.00 Lab Training Registration
41170 Verizon California 564.47 Telephone Services
41171 Patrick B.Carnahan 436.50 Meeting/Tainin9 Expense Reimbursement
41172 Robert P.Ghirelli 13.91 Mealing/Taining Expense Reimbursement
41173 James R.Hams 548.76 Meeting/Taining Expense Reimbursement
41174 W.Doug Hauser 200.00 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement
41175 David A.Ludwin 189.30 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,081,224.06
Payroll Disbursements
25368-25368 Interim Paycheck $ 956.21 Reissue of Lost Check
25369-25485 Employee Paychecks 174,735.91 Biweekly Payroll 12/26/01
68143-68594 Direct Deposit Statements 822,624.58 Biweekly Payroll 12r26101
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 998.316.70
Page 7 018
Claims Paid From 12/16/01 to 12/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Wire Transfer Payments
State Street Bank$Trust Co.of CA $ 117,153.90 December Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B COPS
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 117,153.9D
Total Claims Paid 12/16/01 .12131/01 $ 6,196,594.66
Page 8 of 6
i
BOARD OF DIRECTORS weennv oae TOZ/27/ Dr.
oyn/oz
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
9
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Copies of Claims Paid reports from 01/01/02- 01/15/02 and 01/16/02 - 01/31/02
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
41176 Air Products&Chemicals & 25.039.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8-89
41177 Blue Cross of California 222.523.23 Medical Insurance Premium
41178 Brown&Caldwell 54.627.01 Engineering Services P2-35-3,J-25-6&241
41179 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 40,043.69 Engineering Services P2-82
41180 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 159,517.14 (8)Servers,(2)PCs.Hardware/SpBware
41181 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 72.356.24 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
41182 Lee&Ro,Inc. 41,037.37 Engineering Services 5-49,5.50.5-51 &5.52
41183 Orange County Water District 65,495.70 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
41184 Painewebber Incorporated 39.977.68 COP Remarketing Agreement
41185 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 123.221.85 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
41186 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 97,436.69 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94
41187 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 107,015.78 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
41188 The Lewis Group 26,622.50 Consulting Service-Project Management Process
41189 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 102,870A9 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95
41190 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 112,864.55 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
41191 The Yakima Company 60,363.79 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
41192 Ken Thompson,Inc. 600,495.00 Construction 5.46
41193 R.Fox Construction, Inc. 55,864.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit. 1
41194 Urbanlec Engineering,Inc. 52,830.00 Construction J-66
41195 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 233.62 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
41196 Acoustical Material Services 644.20 Ceiling Tile
41197 Action Instruments Go Goldin.Stale Ctd. 1,514.61 Instrument Pans&Supplies
41198 Great American Printing Co. 2.032.82 Paper
41199 Airborne Express 83.35 Air Freight
41200 Aegas Safety 1.758.61 Barely Supplies
41201 Alder's Carpel&Drapes 1.194.12 Floor Tile Replacement
41202 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 99.14 Instrument Supplies
41203 Artistic Blinds 1,641.86 Mini Blinds&Installation
41204 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 1,952.41 (3)Pumps,Repairs&Testing
41205 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,017.09 Long Distance Telephone Service
41206 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.36 Telephone Service
41207 Basic Chemical Solutions 331.12 Chemicals
41208 Battery Specialties 1,207.23 Batteries
41209 Backman Coulter,Inc. 123.41 Lab Parts&Supplies
41210 BloVir Laboratories 3.561.00 Lab Services
41211 Boznanski&Co.,Inc. 1,500.D0 Appraisal Services
41212 Westport Aparalus DBA Breaker Supply 1.004.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41213 Brian A. Ewald,M.D.,Inc. 5,675.00 Medical Services-Claim of Tran vs. Kovacs
41214 Bush&Associales, Inc. 3,142.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97
41216 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims
41216 Cameron Welding Supply 1,345.73 Welding&Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41217 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 5.593.00 Engineering Services J-40-3,7.36.7-39&7-41
41218 Carollo Engineers 7.444.43 Professional Services P2-60
41219 Century Business Solutions,Inc. 8,150.11 Office Supplies
41220 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1.279.23 Copier Lease
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41221 Coast Fire Equipment 1,501.89 (20)Fire Extinguishers
41222 Coast Rubber Stamp Mfg. 25.80 Stationery&Offce Supplies
41223 Coastline Equipment 930.77 Wheel Loader Repairs
41224 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 3,875.47 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41225 Consolidated Plastics Company 115.95 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41226 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-Management Training
41227 Corporate Express Imaging 870.75 Computer Supplies
41228 Corporate Express 915.01 Office Supplies
41229 County Wholesale Electric Co. 849.09 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41230 Crane America Services, Inc. 291.13 Crane Services
41231 Cylec Industries 20,182.69 Anionic Polymer Spec,No.9798-18
41232 CWEA Membership 140,00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
41233 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Blosolkis Analysis
41234 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 56.89 Paint Supplies
41235 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 462.90 Electrical Supplies
41236 Elliott Bay Design Group 10,140.57 Professional Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel
41237 Enchanter, Inc. 1.600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
41238 Environmental Resource Association 1,328.70 Lab Parts&Supplies
41239 EFA,Inc. 2,886.00 Legal Services-Tran vs. Kovacs
41240 FedEx Corporation 41.62 Air Freight
41241 Fllarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 997.50 Professional Services-SPMT Negotiations
41242 First American Real Estate Solutions 222.05 Orange County Property Information
41243 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,996.56 Lab Pans&Supplies
41244 Flo-Systems, Inc. 210.99 Pump Supplies
41245 Fountain Valley Camera 154.72 Photo Supplies
41246 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 345.89 Truck Wash Tickets
41247 Fys Electronics 205.15 Computer Supplies
41248 General Petroleum 8.199.95 Unleaded Gasoline
41249 George Yardley Co. 534.28 Lab Supplies
41250 Geoffrey Gibbs 1.123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
41251 Gold Systems,Inc. 14.596.25 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application
41252 Goldenwest Window Service 220.00 Professional Cleaning Services
41253 Governing Magazine 15.00 Subscription Postage
41254 WIN Grainger,Inc. 309.21 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41255 Graphic Distributors 546.53 Photographic Supplies
41258 Grating Pacific,Inc. 2,538.04 Fiberglass Grating
41257 Greybar 351.79 Electrical Supplies
41258 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 124.36 Janitorial Supplies
41259 GRC Electronics 530.38 Repair of VCRIDubbing Equipment
41260 Hach Company 2,893.42 Lab Supplies
41261 Harold Pdmmse Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples
41262 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 176.57 Engine Generator Control Supplies
41263 HIM.Inc. 1,618.70 Tools
41264 The Holman Group 715,68 Employee Assistance Program Premium
41265 Home Depot 89.01 Small Hardware
41266 Hopkins Technical Products 88,45 Instrument Parts&Supplies
Page 2 of 7
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to O1115/02
Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description
41267 Hub Auto Supply 21.54 Automotive Parts&Supplies
41268 City of Huntington Beach 18,841.40 Water Use
41269 HPC Technologies 1,095.00 O&M Training Registration
41270 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,543.07 Printing Service
41271 Industrial Distribution Group 4,614.71 Tools&Mechanical Supplies
41272 Industrial Metal Supply 2.809.90 Metal
41273 Infinity Technology USA 499.92 Computer Supplies
41274 Inside EPA 300.00 Subscription
41275 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,813.08 Instrument Supplies
41276 Ionics Instrument Business Group 421.76 Lab Parts&Supplies
41277 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 Offsfte Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server
41278 IABC 227.00 Membership-International Association of Business Co.
41279 IDMS:Imaging Document Mgmt.Solutions 10.991.00 Professional Services J-25-1
41280 ISA 120.00 Membership
41281 J&L Industrial Supply 439.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41282 JE Msmhard Associates 835.75 Lab Parts&Supplies
41283 J.D.Edwards 500.00 Accounting Training Registration
41284 Jays Catering 40.74 Meeting Expenses
41285 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services, Inc. 402.49 Software Maintenance
41286 Johnstone Supply 146.68 Electrical Supplies
41207 JPR Systems,Inc 97.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41288 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,757-50 FIS Support Services
41289 Kelly Lassig or Doris Scobie 1,147.94 Vehicle Damage Claim Settlement
41290 Kroll Laboratory,Inc. 2.682.60 Lab Services-Claim of Tmn vs.Kovacs
41291 David Koren 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
41292 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 43.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41293 La Mode Chemical Products 153.87 Lab Pans&Supplies
41294 Leadership Directories 308.75 Subscription
41295 Lexis-Nexis 232.75 Books&Publications
41296 Unjer Company do Gerald Jones 4.328.65 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
41297 Lustre-Cal 554.70 CCSD Decals for Wastehauler Trucks
41298 Lutheran High School 2,244.00 Reconciliation User Fee Program
41299 Maintenance Technology Corp. 319.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41300 Memce International 1,419.00 Janitorial Supplies
41301 MarVac Electronics 67.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41302 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 347.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41303 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 2,646.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41304 Medlin Controls Co. 3,224.64 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41305 Mid-West Associates 15,257.58 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41306 Mission Uniform Service 2,815.36 Uniform Rentals
41307 Moody's Investors Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees
41308 MCR Technologies, Inc. 608.47 (30)Strip Charts
41309 National Institute of Bids.&Technology 1,503.00 Lab Pans&Supplies
41310 Neal Supply Co. 239.99 Plumbing Supplies
41311 NetVemam of Silicone Valley 5.542.30 Security System Maintenance
41312 r ''Wctromcs 737.62 Electrical Pans&Supplies
e
Page 3of7 �
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41313 City of Newport Beach 91.18 Water Use
41314 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 5.619.66 LubricenUDiesel Fuel
41315 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,325.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-96
41316 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service
41317 NCG Porter Novelli 8,119.34 Professional Services-Public Relations
41316 O.C.Wlndustrial Co. 401.15 Plumbing&Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41319 Ocean Blue Environmental Services 6,526.00 Sewer Spill Cleanup-Bitter Point Pump Station
41320 Of0ce Depot Business Services Div. 1,483.61 Office Supplies
41321 OnsSouroe Distributors,Inc. 1,470.79 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41322 Orange County Hose Company 538.58 Hose
41323 Orange County Pump Co. 219.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41324 Orange County Wimvater Works 12.97 Plumbing Supplies
41325 Orangewood Business Center,Inc. 11,209.34 Reconciliation User Fee Program
41326 Oxygen Service Company 79.01 Specialty Gases
41327 OCB Reprographics WAS Printing Service-MO 1/26100
41328 Pacific Bell 25.23 Telephone Services
41329 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
41330 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,613.39 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41331 Danny Parker 1.123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
41332 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 720.25 Janitorial Supplies
41333 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 3,448.42 Lab Parts&Supplies
41334 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 10,490.44 Sodium Hypochlonte
41335 Polydyne, Inc. 15,875.68 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
41336 Hach cdo Ponton Industries 425.50 Lab Parts&Supplies
41337 Port Supply 35.75 Lab Pans&Supplies
41338 Posh Parties&Special Events 135.52 Meeting Supplies
41339 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium
41340 Process Equipment Company 1,086.92 Pump Supplies
41341 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 3,273.38 (10)Pumps
41342 PRIMA: Pudic Risk Management Assoc. 295.00 Membership
41343 GOS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service
41344 Realtime Systems Corporation 21,375.00 Software Maintenance
41345 Regents of Univ.of California 2,572.66 Professional Services J-85
41346 Reliastar 8,485.00 Employee Medical Health Premium
41347 Relisstar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8.439.78 Ufe Insurance Premium
41348 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 1,50225 Video Services
41349 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 608.77 Pump Supplies
41350 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 112.28 Paint Supplies
41351 S&J Supply Co Inc 681.55 Plumbing Supplies
41352 Schwing America, Inc. 548.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41353 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 124214 Lab Pans&Supplies
41354 Sears Industrial Sales 88.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41355 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,949.00 Pump Supplies
41356 Supelce,Inc. 414.91 Lab Parts&Supplies
41357 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 2,929.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41358 So. Cal.Gas Company 840.00 Natural Gas
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 01/O1/02 to O1/15102
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41359 SoftChoice 7,901.25 Software
41360 Southern California Edison 22,342.85 Power
41361 Slate Strait Bank and Trust Go.of Ca. 4.747.60 COP Trustee Services
41362 Rudolph Stewart 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
41363 SUN-SRI 170.75 Lab Pars&Supplies
41364 Sunset Ford 181.46 Vehicle Supplies
41365 Sunset Industrial Parts 2.158.09 Mechanical Pars&Supplies
41366 Super Chem Corporation 486.50 Chemicals
41367 SAWPA 3.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
41368 Team.Inc. 1,644.75 Valves
41369 Taylor-Dunn 86.20 Electric Car Parts
41370 Textile Engineering Associates 1,128.75 Mechanical Pars&Supplies
41371 Thermo Finnigan,L.L.C. 1,588.25 Lab Pars&Supplies
41372 ThemloGaslec,Inc. 515.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41373 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 704.28 Mechanical Supplies
41374 Toms Lock&Safe Service&Sales 14.92 Locks&Keys
41375 Tran Consulting Engineers 8.981.00 Engineering Services J-66&7-21
41376 Tropical PWza Nursery,Inc. 1.064.82 Contract Groundskeepirg MO 5-11-94
41377 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 87.09 Track Supplies
41378 Tekeystems 4,781.00 Temporary Employment Services
41379 U.S.Geological Survey 2.300.00 Ocean Monitoring Program J-85
41380 United Parcel Service 44.08 Parcel Services
41381 Unocal 76 184.44 Fuel for Vehicles
41382 Vallen Safety Supply Company 90.78 Safety Supplies
41383 Valley Cities Supply Company 72.90 Plumbing Supplies
41384 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 112.54 Mechanical Supplies
41385 Versed 5,000.00 Software Maintenance
41386 Verizon California 798.30 Telephone Services
41387 Veme's Plumbing 50.00 Testing&Certification for all Backilow Devices Q PIM. 1 2 and Pump Stations
41388 Village Nurseries 327.01 Landscaping Supplies
41389 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 23.559.87 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
41390 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1,456.48 Lab Parts&Supplies
41391 The Wackenhut Corporation 4.953.92 Security Guards
41392 Water Environmenl Federation 72.75 Publication
41393 WaterReuse Association 2,750.00 Membership
41394 Wabe Sanitary Supply 323.88 Janitorial Supplies
41395 Westbay Solutions Group 1,650.00 Information Technology Training Registration
41396 Xerox Corporation 6,927.84 Copier&Fax Losses
41397 Vokogawa Corp.of America - 874.00 Chars
41398 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Ix. 18,340.20 Construction 2-41-2
41399 Dean M.Carrico 260.58 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement
41400 Larry Gibson 314.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
41401 James D. Heiberg 468.55 MeetingRwining Expense Reimbursement
41402 Matthew P.Smith 550.98 Meetfng/fmining Expense Reimbursement
41403 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee
41404 NAFA, Inc. 35.00 O&M Meeting Registration
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to O1/15/02
Warrant Na. Vendor Amount Description
41405 NAFA,Inc. 35.00 O&M Meeting Registration
41406 Orange County Sanitation District 1,277.34 Petty Cash Ralmb.
41407 24 Hour Fitness 1,875.DD Corporate Membership
41408 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
41409 Orange County Sanitation District 474,540.65 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
41410 U.S.Peroxide 45.249.92 Professional Services-Collection System Odor&Corrosion Control Study&Chemicals
41411 American Airlines 1,485.75 Travel Services
41412 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 67.81 Telephone Service
41413 AT&T Wireless Services-Aidime 4,595.3e Cellular Telephone Service
41414 Could Order 625.20 Wage Garnishment
41415 Center for Creative Growth 1,250.00 Professional Services-Management Coaching
41416 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
41417 CASA 300.D0 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Meeting Registration
41418 CCP Industries 11,009.56 Janitorial Supplies
41419 CSMFO 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration
41420 Dawson Company 6,845.82 Hot Water Loop Expansion Tank&Mechanical Parts
41421 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 77.37 Stationery&Office Supplies
41422 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
41423 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 778.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41424 Flat and Ventral,Inc. 336.00 Concrete Culling
41425 Franklin Covey 563.00 Office Supplies
41426 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
41427 FLW,Inc. 2.915.76 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41428 G.F.O.A. 275.00 Flmnce Meeting Registration
41429 HPC Technologies 1,095.00 0&M Training Registration
41430 Ind.Union of Oper.Erg.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,563.53 Dues Deduction
41431 IDM Controls,Inc. 5,675.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41432 Kelly Pipe Co.,L.L.C. 2,389.60 Plumbing Pans&Supplies
41433 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.546.45 Mechanical Supplies
41434 McMaster-Care Supply Co. 290.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41435 City of Newport Beach 23.24 Water Use
41436 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
41437 Orange Valve&Filing Company 696.71 Fillings
41438 OCEA 448.87 Dues Deduction
41439 Pacific Mechanical Supply 370.19 Plumbing Supplies
41440 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
41441 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
41442 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction
41443 Projects Partners 8,338.04 Temporary Employment Services
41444 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 604.42 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41445 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 253.09 Lab Parts&Supplies
41446 Sharon.Larsen&Marsh 110.00 Administration Meeting Registration
41447 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
41448 So.Col.Gas Company 2.497.59 Natural Gas
41449 Southern California Water 69.07 Water Use
41450 Summit Steel 259.44 Metal
Page 6 of 7
Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to O1/15102
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41451 U.S.Composting Council 250.00 Membership
41452 United States Postal Service 87.50 P.O,Box Fee
41453 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions
41454 Verizon California 1,250.85 Telephone Services
41455 Tod E.Haynes 553.64 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
41456 Vann Phonsid 321.39 MeetingRrelning Expense Reimbursement
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,163,778.00
Payroll Disbursements
25486-25621 Employee Paychecks $ 173.411.16 Bleakly Payroll 01/09/02
25622-25622 Interim Paycheck 188.16 Adjustment
68595-69048 Direct Deposit Statements 755,762.29 Biweekly Payroll O1/09/02
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 929,361.63
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas $ 116,360.28 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas 47,794.17 December Interest Payment an Sense 1993 Cenlfimtes of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164,154.45
Total Claims Paid 01101102-01115102 $ 4,257,284.08
Page 7 of 7 " '
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31102
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warnsnta
41457 American Express 29,234.96 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services
41458 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 99,368.89 Professional Services J-73-2
41459 AKM Consulting Engineers 37,460.47 Professional Services 7-36,7-39&741
41460 ASAP Software Express 137,094.76 Software Maintenance Agreement-650 Computers
41461 Black&Veatch Corporation 187,467.39 Engineering Services P1-46-2,P1-76,P1-76&J-70
41462 Brown&Caldwell 44,166.24 Engineering Services 1.98
41463 Carollo Engineers 378,228.90 Professional Services P2-66&Micm08ration Demonstration Study
41464 Delta Dental 51,813.02 Denial Insurance Plan
41465 Harbour Engineering Group 32,364.00 (4)Impellers&Pump Paris&Supplies
41466 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 34,055.15 Medical Insurance Premium
41467 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 106,374.11 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
41468 Lightin c/o Leonard Engineered Products 39,128.93 Mechanical Repairs-Gear Aerators
41469 Mike Pdich&Sons 224Z&78 Const.-Farce Main Repairs,Potholing,Cleaning&Video Insp.at Bitter Pump Ste.
41470 Orange County Water District 1,538,249.50 Join GW RS Project-J-36
41471 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 140.889.13 Engineering Services J-42&2-41
41472 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 30,165.40 Sodium Hypochlodle
41473 Polydyne,Inc. 33,409.54 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
41474 Projects Partners 33.085.94 Temporary Employment Services
41475 Rain for Rent 25,484.66 (1)Trailer Mounted Diesel Pump
41476 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 74.191.76 Ccean Monitoring J-85
41477 Sopp Chevrolet 25,210.80 (1)2002 Chevy Silverado
41478 Tule Ranch/Magan Fame 99,232.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
41479 U.S.Geological Survey 181.686.87 Ocean Monitoring Program J-85,HB 111
41480 U.S.Peroxide 88,016.00 Prof.Services&Chemical-Coll.Sys.Odor&Corrosion Control Phase II
41481 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 30,997.77 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
41482 Waste Markets Corp. 57,978.40 Maim.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Materials Removal
41483 The Yakima Company 41,393.54 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00
41484 Ark Construction Company 100,800.00 Construction Pi-62
41485 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,432,074.88 Construction J-71A.J-71-2.Pt-37&P2-39
41406 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 49.615.13 Construction P148.2&J-53
41487 Southern Contracting Company 59,912.00 Construction J-33-1-A
41488 Orange County Sanitation District 26,943.43 Worker's Comp. Reimb.
41489 A.B.I./V.I.P.Attorney Service 515.17 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
41490 Able Scale Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection
41491 Action Instruments c/o Goldin State Cntd 1,754.30 Instrument Parts&Supplies
41492 Advanced Power&Controls,L.L.C. 10,110.27 Electrical Control Panels for(2)Pumps @ Pit,2 Truck Loading Facilities
41493 Air Products&Chemicals 332.36 Lab Paris&Supplies
41494 Airborne Express 66.58 Air Freight
41495 Airgas Safety 671.73 Safety Supplies
41496 Alden's Carpet&Drapes 160.46 Floor Tile Replacement
41497 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 352.72 Instrument Supplies
41498 American Public Works Association 167.00 Publication
41499 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,171.75 Safety Vklece
41500 Appleone Employment Service 8,151.32 Temporary Employment Services
41501 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 1,8D0.00 Toxicity Testing
Page 1 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41502 Pagenet 2,634.84 Pagers,Service&Aldime
41503 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 4,337.96 Pump Repairs&Testing
41504 AMSA 1.325.00 O&M Meeting Registration
41505 ASF User Services Office 1.800.00 Satellite Maps
41506 American Telephone and Telegraph Corp. 76.27 Telephone Service
41507 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.15 Cellular Telephone Service
41508 AWSI 233.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
41509 BloMeneux Vitek,Inc. 894.56 Lab Parts&Supplies
41510 Bloomberg L.P. 4,472.91 Financial Monitoring MO4-14-93
41511 Borden Decal Company 861.61 Employee Hang Tag Parking Permits
41512 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1.329.76 Professional Services 2-31
41513 Bush&Associates,Inc. 5,566.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
41514 Business Objects Americas 8,062.50 Software Maintenance-Business Objects
41515 BEX Incorporated 90.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41516 California Auto Collision 494.53 Truck Repair
41517 Cad Warren&Co. 114.91 Insurance Claims Administrator
41518 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 150.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality Management
41519 Cayman Chemical Company 286.50 Lab Parts&Supplies
41520 Clayton Controls 53.98 Mechanical Paris&Supplies
41521 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3,614.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41522 Conveyor Components Co. 304.74 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41523 Cooper Energy Services 307.44 Engine Supplies
4162A Core Laboratories,Inc. 500.00 Lab Analyses
41525 CoreMedla 510.00 Safely Video
41526 Corporate Express 1.386.95 Office Supplies
41627 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13.639.00 Custodial Services Spec No.9890-09
41528 Cost Containment Solutions 1,007.82 Worker's Comp.Services
41529 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,358.85 Maim.Agreement -Repairs/Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios
41530 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,151.79 Instrument Parts&Supplies
41531 Crane America Services,Inc. 965.72 Repairs&Maintenance Service
41632 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Service Agreement-Can.Gen.Water Softener Systems
41533 Cytec Industries 319.50 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
41534 CASA 11,000.00 Membership
41535 CASA 600.00 Admin.Meeting Registration
41536 CELSOC 50.64 Publications
41537 CR&R,Inc. 4,704.32 Container Rentals
41538 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
41539 DTI 735.00 Chemicals
41540 Del Mar Analytical 280.00 Slosollds Analysis
41541 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription
41542 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 3,122.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41543 Electra-Bond,Inc. 7,483.62 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs
41544 Ellidl Bay Design Group 10,140.57 Professional Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel
41545 Enchanter,Inc. 1,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
41546 Environmental Science Associates 22,624.11 Professional Services JA0-5
41547 Equipco Sales&Service 1,883.90 Inst.Parts,Supplies&Repairs
Page 2 of 13 �'
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41548 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,752.75 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
41549 FedEx Corporation 94.12 Air Freight
41550 Filarsky&Wall,L.L.P. 1,330.00 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations
41551 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3.134.23 Lab Parts&Supplies
41552 Fountain Valley Camera 16.32 Photo Supplies
41553 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 341.99 Truck Wash Tickets
41554 Bloomberg L.P. 816.09 Financing Monitoring MO4-14-93
415W Franklin Covey Co. 301.40 Once Supplies
41556 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 242.44 Paint Supplies
41557 Frederick Pump&Engineering 7.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41568 FMs Electronics 702.34 Computer Supplies
41559 FLW,Inc. 1,669.89 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance
41560 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 420.63 Maintenance Materials
41561 Ganahl Lumber Company 47.83 Lumber/Hardware
41562 Glenlch-Mitchell,Inc. 940.63 Bell Filler Press Supplies
41563 Golden Bell Products 12,540.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes
41564 Goldenwavt Window Service 2.462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990016
41565 Grafix Training&Consulting 3,893.00 Information Technology Training Registration
41566 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,046.29 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41567 Graybar 1,18242 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41568 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 399.90 Janitorial Supplies
41569 American Sigma,Inc. 3,019.24 Ins.Pans&Supplies
41570 Harold Primrose Ice 66.50 Ice For Samples
41571 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 23.00 Meeting Expenses
41572 Hill Brothers 4,876.71 Chemicals
41573 HIM, Inc. 708.81 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41574 Home Depot 76.93 Small Hardware
41575 How Magazine 74.96 Subscription
41576 Hub Auto Supply 123.37 Truck Paris
41577 Imaging Express 68.21 Printer Maintenance
41578 Industrial Distribution Group 328.52 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41579 Industrial Metal Supply 2,273.24 Metal
41580 Information Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service
41581 Interstate Battery Systems 63.37 Batteries
41582 Imensys Systems,Inc. 1,335.37 Electrical Pans&Supplies
41683 Irvine Ranch Water District 32.54 Water Use
41584 J&B Auto Paris 355.19 Auto Pans&Supplies
41585 J&L Industrial Supply 402.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41566 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5,249.59 Instrument Parts&Supplies
41587 J.D.Edwards 3,825.00 On-Site Training
41588 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3,527.77 Construction-Installation&Maint.of Gas Flaps for Collection System
41589 Jana Contracting Corp 7,958.27 Construction-Sewer Lateral Repairs at Crawford Canyon
41590 Jays Catering 527.66 Meeting Expenses
41591 Jensen Instrument Co. 779.97 Instrument Pans&Supplies
41592 Johnstone Supply 12.29 Electrical Supplies
41593 Karen Monaco&Asso sales 6,896.25 FIS Support Services
Page 3 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41594 Kelly Paper 115.09 Paper
41595 Kensington Electroncs 975.21 Electrical Supplies
41596 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 5,227.48 (2)Workstations
41597 Knowledge Point 2.418.75 Software Mall
41598 Lab Support 2.839.50 Temporary Employment Services
41599 Law/Crandall 2,631.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182
41600 La Motto Chemical Products 220.49 Chemicals
41501 Lee&Ro,Inc. 11,976.86 Engineering Services-Pit.2,Power Bldg.2-Cable Troy Improvements
41602 Lessons in Leadership 1,769.45 Compliance and Information Technology Meeting&Training Registration
41603 Lessons in Leadership 49.95 Compliance Training Supplies
41604 Lln)er Company Up Gerald Jones 4,244.95 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
41605 Long Beach Lins-X 1.450.78 Truck Liner and Fiberglass Truck Lid
41606 Luccrs 75.00 Meeting Expense
41607 ManaB,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy
41608 MarVac Electronics 66.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41609 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 178.91 Tools
41610 Mac Analytical System 8,975.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis
41611 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 2,138.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41612 Medlin Controls Co. 484.90 Instrument Supplies
41613 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,750.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41614 Mission Uniform Service 5,80127 Uniform Rentals
41615 MotoPholo 71.47 Photographic Services
41616 MGD Technologies,Inc. 7,100.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring
41617 National Micr000mp Services 1,212A0 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
41618 Neal Supply Co. 1,003.82 Plumbing Supplies
41619 NatVersanl of Southern California 10,708.45 Human Resources Security System Improvements
41620 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 6,213.82 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
41621 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.730.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
41622 Northern Tool&Equipment Company,Inc. 7,720.27 (3)Honda Generators
41623 O.C.Windustrial Co. 1,680.90 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41024 Office Depot Business Services Div. 892.47 Office Supplies
41625 Omnlmaric Instrument Corp. 6,713.38 Instrument-Moisture Analyzer
41626 OneSource Distributors,Ina 2.114.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41627 Orange County Hose Company 143.27 Hose Supplies&Repairs
41628 Orco Door Closer Services 448.82 Door Maintenance
41629 Oxygen Service Company 2,971.35 Specialty Gases
41630 OCB Reprographics 3,501.54 Printing Service-MO 1126/00
41631 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Malnt.
41632 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 75.59 A/C Filters
41633 Pacific Bell 1,132.89 Telephone Services
41634 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
41635 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,493.15 Plumbing Supplies
41636 Parts Unlimited 89.47 Truck Supplies
41637 Pave West 2.612.00 Construction-Repairs to Asphalt at Fac.Maint Shops A&B
41638 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 846.57 Lab Instrument Repair
41639 Practitioners Publishing 188.13 Publications
Page 4 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41640 Primary Source 2,321.38 Office Furniture
41641 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 15,734.01 Sewer Line Cleaning Contract
41642 Putxmelster 4,908.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41643 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service
41644 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
41W Radius Maps 2,100.00 Professional Services 1-24
41646 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,289.70 Trash Removal
41647 Reliastar 8,553,55 Employee Medical Health Premium
41648 Roto Rooter 323.25 Sewer Line Clearing
41649 Ryan Hem Products Corp. 974.51 Plumbing Supplies
41650 RJN Group,Inc. 11,287.50 CMMS Consulting Services
41651 RPM Electric Motors 1,049.35 Mechanical Repairs&Testing
41652 Safety-Kleen 5,269.38 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement
41653 Sencon Engineering, Inc. 8,932.50 Construction-Manhole Repairs&Rehabilitation of Concrete Surfaces
41654 Schneider Electric 226.20 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance
41655 Schwing America, Inc. 2,256.32 Pump Supplies
41656 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 29.99 Specially Gases
41657 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 3,474.00 Lab Equipment Pens&Service
41658 Self-insurance Plans 1.953.68 Stale Workers'Compensation User Funding&Assessment
41659 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 449.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41660 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.356.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41661 Aldrich Chemical Co. 83.97 Lab Paris It Supplies
41662 Skylights Unlimited 3.250.00 Skylights Replacement&Removal
41663 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.817.58 Natural Gas
41664 SmAhem California Edison 17,215.78 Power
41665 Southern California Edison 9,265.52 Power
41666 Sparkleffs 1,885.45 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
41667 Strata international,Inc. 505A6 Chemicals
41668 Summit Steel 070.16 Metal
41669 Sunset Industrial Paris 371.43 Mechanical Supplies
41670 Super Power Products 387.00 Janitorial Supplies
41671 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 15,289.27 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
41672 SAWPA 3,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
41673 SCCWRP 320.00 Lab Meeting Registration
41674 SCP Science 11.00 Lab Supplies
41675 SPEC Services, Inc 11,325.96 Engineering Services J-33-1
41676 Tasew, Inc. 1.691.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41677 Taylor-Dunn 1.848.56 Electric Cart Parts
41678 Terminiz International Co. 375.00 Past Control
41679 Tetra Tech, Inc. 5,797.28 Professional Services 11-22
41680 The Orange County Register 1,612.80 Notices&Ads
41681 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 7,047.91 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41682 Thomson Financial 646.50 Subscription
41683 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance
41684 Daily Pilot 168.75 Notices&Ads
41685 Tran Consulting Engineers 3,525.00 Prof.Sew.-Fiber Oplica Ext.at Pit. 1 &Clarifiers N&P Retaining Well Eat.at Pit.2
Page 5 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41686 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 24.953.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
41687 Truk&Auto Supply,Inc. 271.87 Truck Supplies
41688 Teksystems 8.068.50 Temporary Employment Services
41689 The Unisource Corporation 75272 Office Supplies
416M United Parcel Service 113.65 Parcel Services
41691 Naval Post Graduate School 5,819.46 Professional Services J-85
41692 UC Regents 500.00 Membership
41693 URS Corporation 3,254.17 Professional Services-Air Toxics Emissions Testing for CGS System
41694 US Equipment Co., Inc. 3,122.14 A/C Supplies
41695 Valley Cities Supply Company 463.95 Mechanical Paris&Supplies
41696 Vedzon California 4,040.84 Telephone Services
41697 Veme's Plumbing 975.00 Testing&Certifications for Backllow Devices at Pits. 1 &2&Pump Stations
41698 Village Nurseries 8,220.00 Zoning&Application Fee Reimbursement
41699 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,394.76 Vision Service Premium
41700 Vocam USA,L.L.C. 357.65 Safety Video
41701 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,982.40 Door Repair&Installation of(2)Windows at Warehouse File Room
41702 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,150.40 Lab Pans&Supplies
41703 The Wackenhut Corporation 11,628.78 Security Guards
41704 The Wall Street Journal 321.43 Subscription
41705 IMRI 8,805.00 Temporary Employment Services
41706 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 377.33 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41707 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 97200 Construction-Pothole(3)Boring Sites
41708 Xerox Corporation 9,398.39 Copier&Fax Machine Leases
41709 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 440.70 Office Supplies
41710 Zumar industries 154.80 Reflective Signs
41711 Zymark Corporation 4,5W.00 Lab Instrument Service Contract
41712 California Bank&Trust 6,65&00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention
41713 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3.459.60 Construction 241-2
41714 MMC,Inc. 5,387.40 Construction-Ventilation System Upgrades at Main SL Pump Station
41715 Union Bank of California 2.61132 Construction P7-46.2&J-53,Retention
41716 Los Angeles Air Conditioning, Inc. 7,720.00 Retention Release-Dust Collection Sys.At Pits. 1 &2 Carpenter Shops
41717 James G.Tinfle 376.16 Meeting/frainirg Expense Reimbursement
41718 Employee Activity Committee 95.00 Service Award Expense
41719 Robert Michna 658.88 Employee Computer Loan Program
41720 U.S.Customs 2,488.13 Customs Fee-Foam Media Shipped from Germany
41721 OCDM Marketing 2,398.10 Public Notices and Postage
41722 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 41,191.17 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium
417M Orange County Sanitation District 505,45925 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
41724 Southern California Edison 32,245.58 Prover
41725 J W Contacting Corporation 200,646.00 Construction P2-60
41726 Union Bank of California 32,294.00 Construction P2-60,Retention
41727 Airgas Safety 1.414.28 Safety Supplies&Equipment
41728 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 735.99 Telephone Service
41729 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.98 Telephone Service
41730 Court Order 62&20 Wage Garnishment
41731 ..a, I ountaln Valley 14,791.54 Water Use
Page 6 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to O1131/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41824 California Auto Collision 359.55 Truck Repair
41M California Dept.of Fish and Game 772.75 Project I-2-4 Permit Fees
41826 Callrol,Inc. 608.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41827 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2.083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims
41828 Cambridge Isotope Labs 772.82 Lab Supplies
41829 C.R.Nelson P.E. 1,200.00 Engineering Consultant 241
41830 Cad Warren&Co. 624.21 Insurance Claims Administrator
41831 Carollo Engineers 7.890.57 Professional Services J-39
41832 Cerullo Engineers 5,896.60 Engineering Services Pi-71
41833 Copelce Capital, Inc. 3,334.14 Copier Lease
41834 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 23.71 Office Supplies
41835 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 386.56 Lab Parts&Supplies
41836 Computer Sciences Corp. 11,545.53 Consulting&Lab Services.Assay Pilot Project
41837 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3,214.07 Electrical Pads&Supplies
41838 Consolidated Freghtways 1,049.47 Freight
41839 Cooper Energy Services 1.788.48 Engine Supplies
41840 Corporate Express Imaging 872.79 Computer Supplies
41841 Corporate Express 401.34 Office Supplies
41842 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
41843 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 761.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41844 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,464.80 Ins.Pads&Supplies
41845 Cyclus Enwrosystems,Inc. 0,791.89 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
41846 California Capacitor Inc. 390.18 Ins.Pads&Supplies
41847 CALIOSHA 4,800.00 Penalty Fees
41848 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 163.00 Lab Supplies
41849 CWEA Membership 112.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
41850 David's Tree Service 5,225.00 Tree Mainl.Service
41851 Del Mar Analytical 1,630.00 Blosolld3 Analysis
41852 Department of Motor Vehicles 8.00 Venda Decal for High Occupancy Vehicle
41853 Deleeuw Instruments Corporation 7,915.76 Gas Data Logger
41864 Dionex Corporation 1,427.00 Lab Equipment Make.
41855 Duhg&Company,Inc. 91.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41856 DunnEdwards Corporation 416.06 Paint Supplies
41857 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription
41858 E,Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 474.69 Electrical Supplies
41859 Edwin M.Perkins 11,161.01 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance
41860 Elliot Bay Design Group 7,043.35 Professional Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel
41861 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 10.168.73 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-December 2001
41862 Enchanter,Inc. 5,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
41863 FedEx Corporation 92.65 Air Freight
41864 Fisher Scientific 5,454.00 Lab Parts&Supplies
41865 Foodcrafl Coffee&Refreshment Services 351.57 Meeting Supplies
41866 FooteJones/lllin ois Gear 2,g09.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41867 Fountain Valley Camera 28.95 Photo Supplies
41668 Franklin Covey 59.48 Office Supplies
41869 FLW,Inc. 589.19 Ins.Parts&Supplies
Page 9 of 13
Claims Paid From 01t16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41870 Ganahl Lumber Company 58.69 Lumber/Hardware
41871 General Petroleum 8,894.41 Unleaded Gasoline
41872 George Yardley Co. 1,922.26 lab Pans&Supplies
41873 Goldatwest Fexe Company _ 924.00 Chain Link Fencing
41874 W W Grainger,Inc. 651.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41875 Great Westem Sanitary Supplies 53.85 Janitorial Supplies
41876 Westmark Sales,ix./GLI International 593.51 Mechanics[Parts&Supplies
41877 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 156.90 Meeting Expenses
41878 HIM,Inc. 7,926.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41879 Home Depot 292.67 Small Han ware
41880 Horizon Technology 224.00 Lab Parts&Supplies
41881 City of Huntington Beach 18,814.43 Water Use
41882 Idm 2.583.00 Lab Equipment Maint.
41883 Imaging Express 410.26 Printer Maintenance
41884 Imaging Plus.Inc. 2,402.44 Printing Service
41885 Industrial Distribution Group 561.09 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41886 Industrial Metal Supply 1,394.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41887 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 Offete Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server
41888 Irvine Photo Graphics 126.07 Photographic Services
41889 J&L Industrial Supply 290.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41890 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1,299.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41891 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 1.953.97 Construction-Plant 2 Gate Repairs
41892 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 5.365.75 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study
41893 Johnstone Supply 172.63 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41894 Karen Monaco&Associates 4,770.00 FIS Support Services
41895 Lab Support 3.303.50 Temporary Employment Services
41896 Law Journal Press 154.32 Publication
41897 Lee&Ro,Inc. 9,148.24 Engineering Consulting Services J-71-7
41898 Leds-Nerds 141.38 Books&Publications
41899 Unkr Cornpany c/o Gerekl Jones 3,935.00 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99
41900 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 1,918.40 Professional Services-Corrosion Study
41901 Maintenance Technology Corp. 515.89 Mechanical Supplies
41902 Manleys Boiler Repair Company,Inn 660.00 Emissions Testing
41903 Market Lab 152.03 Lab Parts&Supplies
41904 McBain Instruments 625.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
41905 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,683.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
419N Mec Analytical System 5,286.16 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis
41907 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 82.28 Janitorial Supplies
41908 Mission Uniform Service 4,373.06 Uniform Rentals
41909 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental
41910 MCR Technologies,Inc. 598.83 Charts
41911 MDS Consulting 2,520.00 Professional Services-Surveying Services
41912 National Plant Services,Inc. 12.896.74 Vacuum Truck Services
41913 Neal Supply Co. 57.11 Plumbing Supplies
41914 NelVersant of Silicone Valley 1,178.13 Security System Maintenance
41915 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 9,258.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
Page 10 of 13 -'
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41916 The Norm Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service
41917 NAFA,Inc. 84.00 Printing
41918 NOG Porter Novella 6,384.19 Prof.Services-Pudic Relations
41919 O.C.Windustdal Co. 397.85 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
41020 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,388.77 Office Supplies
41921 Omnimark Instrument Corp $49.57 Instrument Rental
41922 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 121.23 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41923 Oxygen Service Company 867.46 Specially Gases
41924 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maint.
41925 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 343.45 A/C Filters
41926 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3.749.31 Plumbing Supplies
41927 Pacific Pads&Controls 77.88 Instrument Supplies
41928 Parker Supply Company 10,117.54 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41929 Patriot Video Productions 1,688.10 Vldm Services
41930 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 246.33 Lab Supplies
41931 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 11,521.37 Sodium Hypochlorlte
41932 Polydyne,Inc. 24,533.22 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
41933 Hach clo Ponton Industries 1.886.56 Instrument Supplies
41934 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 550.00 Mechanical Maim.
41935 Primedia Business 431.63 Publications
419M PAPA-Pesticide Applicator Seminar 110.00 Administration Meeting Registration
41937 PSOC Pool Supply of Orange County,Inc. 19.04 Electrical Supplies
41938 O08.L.L:C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service
41939 Ralnin Instrument Co.,Inc. 124.56 Instrument Repairs&Maint.Service
41940 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 592.50 Accounting Training Registration
41941 Ryan Herod Products Corp. 1,62&35 Plumbing Supplies
41942 Santa Ana Reg.Water Quality Control 4,500.00 Permit&Certi0cation for J-39
41943 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 2,507.00 lab Equipment Parts&Service
41944 City of Seal Beach 113.65 Water Use
41945 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 1,207.36 Mechanical Supplies
41946 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 153.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41947 Supelm,Inc. 352.87 Lab Supplies
41948 Snap On Industrial 331.51 Tools
41949 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1.050.70 FY 2000.01 Emissions,Operating&Misc.Permit Fees
41M Southern Cold Coastal Water Research 20,375.00 Professional Services-Spill Impact Modeling Project-Newport Bay Watershed
41951 Spherion Corporation 100.00 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
41952 Summit Information Resources 8,720.00 Computers-(4)Vaxstalions
41953 Sunset Industrial Parts 567.15 Mechanical Supplies
41954 BARBS 285.00 Information Technology Meeting&Training Registration
41955 SARBS-CWFA 10.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc.
41956 SCCWRP 80.00 Compliance Meeting Registration
41957 Techpro Sales&Service,Inc. 144.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
41958 Tekdraulics,Inc. 1,577.05 Pump Supplies
41959 Tetra Tech,Inc. 2,088.65 Professional Service 11-22
41960 The Pittsburgh Conference 1,160.00 Lab Meeting Registration
41961 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,860.65 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
Page 11 of 13
Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
41962 ThyscanKrupp Elevator 1.280.00 Elevator Maintenance
41963 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services
41964 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 99.39 Locks&Keys
41965 The Trans Company 944.71 A/C Pans
41966 Transcat 822.74 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41967 Tropical Plena Nursery,Inc. 150.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
41968 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 473.92 Truck Supplies
41969 Truasdali Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services
41970 Tuthill Energy Systems,Uo Mckenna 858.55 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
41971 Teksystems 6,133.00 Temporary Employment Services
41972 Ugra Scientific 495.99 Lab Supplies
41073 Union Bank of California 3,955.73 Banking Services
41974 United Parcel Service 1.106.00 Parcel Services
41975 Unocal 76 57.32 Fuel for Vehicles
41976 UC Regents 790.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration
41977 U-Line 107.22 Office Supplies
41978 Vallen Safely Supply Company $4.05 Safety Supplies
41979 Valley Cities Supply Company 678.26 Plumbing Supplies
41980 Verimn California 33.97 Telephone Services
41D81 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 467.42 Lab Supplies
41982 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,936.97 Security Guards
41983 Waste Markets Corp. 21.259.91 Maintenance Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Material Removal
41984 Watson Bros,Inc. 564.38 Lab Parrs&Supplies
41985 Waxle Sanitary Supply 379.63 Janitorial Supplies
41986 IMRI 6,387.60 Temporary Employment Services
41987 Westport Aparetus DBA Breaker Supply 808.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies
41988 WEF 112.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation
41989 Xerox Corporation 4,848.74 Copier&Fax Machine Leases
41990 YokogaWa Corp.of America 1.888.97 Instrument Supplies
41991 Olsson Construction,Inc. 2,092.00 Construction-Fuzzy Fitter Pipe Installation
41992 South Coast Air Quality Management Diet. 14,532.15 FY 2000-01 Emissions,Operating&Misc.Permit Fees
41993 Emilio Adston 805.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
41994 Lisa Arosteguy 105.66 Mestingr7relning Expense Reimbursement
41995 Antonio Briseno 554.18 Meating?mining Expense Reimbursement
41996 Jeffrey Bmwn 703.49 Meelingrrreining Expense Reimbursement
41997 Daniel C. Fontela 461.74 Meelingrrralning Expanse Reimbursement
41998 Randy E.Harris 110.63 MeelingRramirg Expense Reimbursement
41999 Tod E. Haynes 443.50 Mestingrrmining Expense Reimbursement
4200D Lisa Murphy 352.43 Meeting/ Taming Expense Reimbursement
42001 Robert Oaten 139.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
42002 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 20,500.91 FY 2000-01 Emissions,Operating&Misc.Permit Fees
42003 Marla Becerra 1,373.81 Employee Computer Loan Program
42004 Boeing-Anaheim 13,064.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program
42005 Centex Homes 16,359.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program
42006 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatire) 296.69 Parcel Maps
42007 Frederick Dunmore and Galeway 2,332.80 Employee Computer Loan Program
Page 12 of 13 -
Claims Paid From 01116/02 to 01131/02
Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description
42008 ICN Biomedicals 1,853.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program
42009 Orange County Sanitation District 585.00 Petty Cash Relmb.
42010 State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annexation Fee
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 11,095,753.94
Payroll Disbursements
25623-25646 Interim Paychecks $ 30.179.65 Mandatory Payouts
25647-25755 Employee Paychecks 171,466.40 Biweekly Payroll 01/23/02
25766-25766 Interim Paycheck 2,708.34 Reissue Voided Check
69049-69502 Direct Deposit Statements 772,159.80 Biweekly Payroll 01/23/02
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 976,514A9
Wire Transfer Payments
Stale Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 104.143.75 January Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation
State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA 2,825,423.61 January Interest Payment on Series 1990-92 Advanoe Refund Certificates of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 2,929,567.36
Total Claims Paid 01116/02.01131102 $ 15,001,835.49
Page 13 of 13
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mewing Date TOBd.af Dir.
z2
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Ie 10(a) r
Nu
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bob Chenowith, Principal Engineering Associate
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-22 - BRIAN ANNEXATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Receive and file petition from Allen Brian requesting annexation of 1.343 acres to
the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive
and Rangeview Drive in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt
Resolution No. OCSD 02-03, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory
to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-22 - Brian Annexation).
SUMMARY
• OCSD received a request from Allen Brian to annex 1.343 acres to OCSD.
This property will be annexed into OCSD (Revenue Area 7).
• The property is currently vacant and the owner would like to build a single family
home and wishes to connect to a public sewer.
• The property owner will extend an existing OCSD sewer and connect his new
4-inch sewer lateral to this system. The homeowner will pay his house connection
permit fee to OCSD.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the
County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties, Board
approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, OCSD does not
receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee.
The fee of$9,922 includes the following:
OCSD Processing $ 500
LAFCO Processing Fee 1,150
State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 350
Revenue Area 7 Planning Study Fee 134
CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43
Annexation Acreage Fee (1.34 acre) 5,215
House Sewer Connection Fee (5 bedrooms) ZOO
TOTAL ANNEXATION AND SEWER CONNECTION FEE $ 9,922
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
Notice of Exemption will be filed.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Exhibit A Legal Description
2. Exhibit B Map
RLC:jo
m..meaumiymawa,m uan nrowuum eoaasva a nw,iw.oum mnazm
,�„ „ , Page 2
I Block 5859
v 2 Module 78,79, 88,89
3 EXHIBIT 'A'
4 OCSD-22 Brian Annexation No. DA 01-09
5 To the Orange County Sanitation District
6
7 Those portions of Block 15 of Irvine's Subdivision,in the Unincorporated Territory,County of
8 Orange, State of California as shown on a map recorded in Book 1,page 88 of Miscellaneous
9 Maps,Records of said County described as follows:
f0
11 Beginning at the an angle point on the Northerly boundary of the existing Orange County
12 Sanitation District(OCSD)as established by the"O'Sullivan Annexation to Orange County
13 Sanitation District No.7(Annexation No. 19)", said angle point being at the Northeasterly
14 terminus of that certain course shown as a 108.38 fcotcurve concave Northwesterly,having a
15 radius of 247.00 feet and a central angle of 25'08'26", a radial bearing to said curve bears North
16 77'38'26"West,said point being distant South 20'09 WI East,262.11 feet from Orange County
17 Surveyor's Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 3237,having a coordinate value (U.S. Survey
18 foot)of North 2229707.794 and East 6099373.821,based upon the California Coordinate System
19 (CCS83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD (1991.35 epoch O.C.S.GPS Adjustment)as said centerline and
20 GPS point is shown on Record of Survey 92-1033,filed in Book 150,Pages 24 through 35,
21 inclusive,of Records of Survey,in the Office of the County Recorder of said County;
22 THENCE along said existing OCSD boundary line per said annexation the following described
23 courses: Southeasterly along said 247.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 25'08'26"
24 an are distance of 108.38 feet to a point that is South 16'00'33"East, 60.98 feet from the
25 Southwesterly comer of a parcel of land described in a deed,recorded as Instrument No.
20000234112 in the Office of the Recorder of said County; ,
Page 1 of 3
2
3 EXHIBIT `A'
4 OCSD-22 Brian Annexation No. DA O1-09
5 To the Orange County Sanitation District
6
7 THENCE leaving said existing OCSD boundary North 16'00'33"West,60.98 feet.to said
8 Southeasterly comer of said Instrument;
9 THENCE following along said Insmunent the following described courses: North 78'48'23"
10 West,238.00 feet;
11 THENCE North 13'42'12"East, 169.89 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Tract No. 3021,
12 recorded in Book 92,pages 5 through 9 inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps,records of said County
13 on a course shown as North 85'44'27"East,203.78 feet, said point being 125.03 feet from its
14 Northeasterly terminus;
15 THENCE along said Southerly Tract 3021 boundary the following described courses:North
16 85-44'27"East, 125.03 feet;
17 THENCE North 60'14'26"East, 87.06;
18 THENCE South 29'45'34"East, 56.91 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Westerly
19 and having a radius of 247.00 feet;
20 THENCE Southerly and Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 42'07'08 an
21 arc distance of 181.57 feet to the Point of Beginning.
22
23 The above described parcel of land contains 1.343 acres more or less.
24
25
Page 2 of 3
2
3 EXHIBIT 'A'
4 OCSD-22 Brian Annexation No.DA 01-09
5 To the Orange County Sanitation District
6
7 This document was prepared by me or
8 under my direction and supervision.
9
10 Dated thisay Of 2001 yet J�,yR�PF}OD
12 �• c
RobertJe ' ek,L.S. 6803 # µo• ?_
13 My license expires 9/302004 STq OF CpJ``O
14
15
16
17 This document does meet the approval of
18 the Orange County Surveyor's Office
19 --t�--
20 Dated this M day oT� ,2001 -
�OIANDSG
21 Jo�P CNN9`0
� a um 7
22 John anal, o eyor L.S. 4408
23 MyPyense expires 9/30/2001 sr NO.Ypa 3
24
�OFCA\.\FOP
25
Page 3 of 3
!'t
OLOER& a959 EXHIBIT "B" SKEET I OF I
MOOLLE: 78.79.69,89 OCSO-22, BRIAN ANNEXATION NO.DAO1-09
TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
® e ,C id 1 I
TRNCLJn Wi 3vav1%1J1Ji`1
MY.92/59 f 89
R0.CPR 723T
(,j PER RS 92.1037 , \
7.794
�. ` E6099]l3 B21
160' ....... "- •..� Sty. LINE ` :�•
TR. 3021 S29-45'34•E....... 56.91\•
GRAPHIC SCALE ;`., •.Ozp '.,�
LEGEND _. __
A
N85• A'2T•E 2003.78 - •I %•f
ANNEXATION BOUNDARY . .. ' •..`'` ` .Gp`
EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY
A•oz•eree•
IJ43- ACRES , r-,A A 24700'
APx.50-10* \p' �•
TNJ nbp wds pgNM q JR d wr W
JYIkIY/JIM NI)2•
INST. N0. PER •0'SIXI.IV•R CRAG,
RoeMr nrrm.LSAB0.T QP 2BB002]<n2 x))j9'1fi=i NRaO-iE-Xrl. P.O.B.
Rrl/an"edIJJ.9/3o/voa
SW. OR. / �/
INST.x0. A•1083r '
20800234112 �' R-247.00
TMS Jtlp d.a xO WONW I Ih O, g Cau4y S.,ww,OT//J6 a.zo).ee•
Lyly yxy, xl6.009]• i
-� base asuct rvCS nNciex
i N' r I+u edIJJ.9/Io/zaa � t 1 1 TO OCSD /7
I g� Ro.wIM r
I �c.c
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To Btl.of Dir.
z/nroz
AGENDA REPORT ien Number iem Wen e
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Risk Manager
SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE BROWN & CALDWELL V. ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file summons and complaint re Brown and Caldwell v. Orange County
Sanitation District, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C-02-0033, and
authorize General Counsel, to appear and defend the interests of the District.
SUMMARY
Please see attached memo dated 2/19/02 from General Counsel.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
Memo from General Counsel.
GGS:MW:BG
Page 1
LAW OFFICES OF
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: General Counsel
DATE: February 19, 2002
RE: Brown and Caldwell v. Orange County Sanitation District,
Comerica Bank, at al., Contra Costa County Superior Court No. C-02-0033
On February 12, 2002, our office was served, on behalf of the District, with the above-
referenced summons and complaint. This litigation arises out of a Professional Services
Agreement between the District and Computerized Facility Integration ("CFI"), wherein CFI was
engaged to design and implement an Electronic Document Management System, Workflow
System, and Facility Atlas for the District's Engineering Department, Contract J-25-1. Pursuant
to that Agreement, CFI subcontracted with Plaintiff Brown and Caldwell to perform consulting,
design, implementation, and related services for CFI.
In May, 2001, CFI filed in the Michigan Federal Court, a Voluntary Petition for
Bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, which was subsequently converted to a
Chapter 7 proceeding. Prior to that time, payment of invoices for services performed under the
Professional Services Agreement were made by the District to CFI, which were deposited into
its account with Comerica Bank. Funds, however, were withdrawn by Comerica from CFI's
account to offset indebtedness from CFI to the Bank.
The District conducted an audit of the contract with CFI and the remaining services to be
performed thereunder. In light of the Bankruptcy action, the District determined that CFI was
unable to perform further. Thus, the contract was terminated in September, 2001. An
outstanding balance remains owing to CFI by the District for services rendered prior to
termination of the Agreement. Despite numerous requests for satisfactory proof of ownership of
those monies, including authorization of said payment by the appropriate order of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, the District has not received those, and thus continues to hold the monies
due. In the present Superior Court action, the District has been named as a Defendant, and its
best recourse is to interplead those funds, which will allow all competing parties to exercise their
legal rights to claim the monies. The District will essentially be removed from further
proceedings.
The action before your Board at this time is to authorize General Counsel to appear and
defend the interests of the District by interpleading the funds.
THOMAS L.WOODRUFF
GENERAL COUNSEL
TLw:pi
isUMLocal
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.Or oil.
ynlo2
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
Io(c)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: SPECIFICATION NO. 9900-05
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100536-OB, issued to OCB
Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of$10,000, for a total
amount not to exceed $110,000, providing for additional copying services.
SUMMARY
• Outside blueprinting, photocopying, and related services are used for the purposes of
high-volume reproduction of engineering construction project plans for bidding, and
various reports and binding services required during the year that cannot be performed
as economically with the District's copying equipment.
• Consolidating purchase of copy services and awarding an annual contract to a single
vendor through the formal bidding process has resulted in a reduction of staff time, and
paperwork in individual ordering and invoice processing for payment of these services
each time they are required.
• OCB Reprographics was awarded a one-year contract by the Board of Directors on
January 26, 2000, for a gross annual amount not to exceed $100,000 for all services bid
under Specification No. 9900-05, with an option to renew up to four, one-year
extensions.
• OCB Reprographics has just finished the first year of a four-year time extension that
expired on January 31, 2002.
• Due to unanticipated printing costs, staff recommends that the Blanket P.O be Increased
by $10,000 to cover printing costs through January 31, 2002. This is a one-time
increase in the Blanket P.O. amount for that year's contract.
• OCB Reprographics has been issued a second time extension under Blanket
P.O No. 100536-OB for the period February 1, 2002 through January 31, 2003 by the
Purchasing Department for an amount not to exceed $100,000, as previously approved
by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2000.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The contract for reprographic services is a Blanket Purchase Order and is charged initially
to the Joint Operating fund. The Budget allocation is reassigned to the project or overhead
number for which the work is requested at the time service is provided.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
There are no known cost efficient alternatives.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
None
PK:sa
GWglob MgeWa Draft RepoN Uoint BoaMS\spec No.9900-05 Pnneng pR 022102.d.
Page 2
9
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, January 23, 2002
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, January 23, 2002 at 5 p.m., In the Districts Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Randy Fuhnnen
Vacant,Vice Chair Joey Racano
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Doug Korthof
Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Chris Hillman
Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee
STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, General Manager
Jim Silva, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General
Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Joey Racano and Doug Korthof spoke against the renewal of the waiver.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
The minutes of the October 24 and November 28, 2001 Steering Committee meetings were
approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Y Page 2
January 23, 2002
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Eckenrode reported on the annual CASA Mid-winter conference that was held
January 16-19 in Palm Springs. Director Silva also attended this conference. The spring conference
will be held at Sierra Peak in Lake Tahoe. Chair Eckenrode also reported on the annual meeting of
the Santa Ana River Watershed Group in Ontario. CA on January 9-10, and a meeting that he
attended with Bill Mills and Iry Pickier from OCWD with former Senator Hannigan in Sacramento to
discuss the GWRS project and additional funding. He announced that he would be attending the
annual Orange County legislators'luncheon in Washington, DC on February 13. The District
sponsors this event with the OCW D.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Blake Anderson on several issues.
A. Report on Orange County Leadership Symposium held at Lake Arrowhead January 13-15.
Mr.Anderson reported that over 60 county leaders attended, including Directors Pat
McGuigan, Mark Leyes,Jim Silva, Debbie Cook, Jim Ferryman, Laurann Cook?. This was
the beginning of a process and additional one-day issue-specific workshops are anticipated.
Director McGuigan said that it was a great learning experience and offered an opportunity to
interface and inter-relate with people from other agencies. Mr. Anderson indicated that
different activities are being planned over the next year and another symposium planned for
January 2003.
B. Update on actions of OCSD/SAWPA Joint Management Committee re SARI.
Mr.Anderson said that staff is reviewing another version of the MOU. SAWPA has
suggested that the JMC not meet until the terms of the MOU are agreed on. The next
meeting is tentatively scheduled for February 26. The draft study on additional alternatives for
the SARI line relocation has been received and a workshop to review the alternatives is
scheduled for January 31. Director McGuigan suggested that the working committees view
the video that has been produced about SAWPA to help the directors understand that
agency's responsibilities.
C. Biosolids Update.
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported on the due diligence findings on the
ICDR composting facility in Colton. The consulting auditor has raised some issues of
concern. A report will be presented on the auditor's findings at the February 6 OMTS
Committee meeting. Mr. Ghirelli also reported that General Counsel and staff are discussing
whether to pursue litigation against Kings County. Biosolids are now being delivered to
Mojave Indian land to be used as land application for feed crops for the dairy industry in
Chino. Mike Moore reported that before the District agreed to using this site, he visited the
property four times to ensure that the District's standards and permit requirements would be
met An extensive monitoring program has been implemented on the farm to monitor the
depth to groundwater limits are met.
D. January 24 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Urban Runoff.
Bob Ghirelli explained the need to amend the District's charter to allow the acceptance and
treatment of urban runoff. The language is the same as IRWD used in its request to the
legislature to amend its charter. This will just legitimize what we are doing with dry weather
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
January 23, 2002
runoff flows. He mentioned that several agencies expressed concern at the CASA meeting
about our intentions to accept these flows,that it could be conceived as a precursor of future
required changes for other agencies.
E. Security Issues.
Greg Mathews reported on changes in security since September 11. Director Silva requested
an evaluation of the 1998 security report. They will be discussed at the next meeting.
F. Ball Road Sewer Relocation.
Mr. Anderson reported on continuing negotiations with the City of Anaheim on the cost
sharing for this relocation.
G. Repairs to Digester Gas Holder at Plant 2.
Mr. Anderson reported that the costs Identified in Board Agenda Item 14 have been revised
because additional work will be required on the structure as well as replacing the bladder.
The amount requested is being increased to $430,000.
H. Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported that copies of a new video would be given
to all directors, cities, and agencies in the service area as well as local television stations. It
provides a general overview of the treatment level issues and calls for public input. It will be
shown at the Board meeting for the first time.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on possible wide-ranging financial impacts to the District
and the cities of a successful appeal of a court case by a property owner on property tax assessment
practices. The Committee requested that Mr.Woodruff update them as additional information is
received.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C)
A. Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Committee Business
Chair Eckenrode Indicated that he would be making changes to the makeup of the
committees. It may require a change to the resolution if any of the beach cities
representatives do not want to serve on the OMTS Committee.
Moved, seconded and duty carried to approve and adopt Rules of Procedure, as set forth in
District Resolution No. OCSD 01-23,as the Rules of Procedure of the Steering Committee.
B. The Agenda items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in February
were reviewed. Mr. Ghirelli reported that the items listed as 1 and 2 would be reviewed in
March. The SAWPA video will be included on all the committees'agendas.
C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were
reviewed.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4
January 23, 2002
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2002 at 5 p.m.
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2002 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened at 6:15 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code
Sections 54956.9,to discuss three cases of existing or anticipated litigation. Minutes of the
Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session
held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be
publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final.
At 6:50 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
S mitted by:
J a Tappan
Stabring Committee Secretary
0:dy.malypffil4roM1p SC MM<ei.LLc
V�
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, January 24, 2002 .
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Thursday, January 24, 2002 at 3 p.m., in the Districts
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel
Shawn Boyd,Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don Hughes
Steve Anderson, Director Larry Paul, County of Orange
Don Bankhead, Director Vicki Wilson, County of Orange
Beth Krom, Director Mike Wellborn, County of Orange
Tod Ridgeway, Director Bob Beardsley, City of Huntington Beach
Norm Eckenrode, Director Scott Baugh, Legislative Consultant
June Nguyen, LACSD
Directors Absent: Rice Alderton
Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor Seems Mehte
Randy Fuhrman
STAFF PRESENT:
Blake Anderson, General Manager
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Bob Ooten, Director of O&M
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager
Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist
Jean Tappan, Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
V
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting
Page 2
January 24, 2002
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the of the August 29, 2001Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Shawn Boyd welcomed the attendees.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, provided an overview of why the committee is meeting
and a PowerPoint presentation was made on steps that have been taken since the beach closures of
1999 and what still needs to be accomplished. The current voluntary policy for treating urban runoff
is for dry weather flows only and a daily limit of 10 million gallons. All diversions require a permit.
The discharge through the outfall continues to be monitored to maintain regulatory permit limits, as
the environmental community is most concerned about the quality of the discharge.
The members of the committee discussed and raised questions on the impacts of a full-blown urban
runoff program, including costs to the cities,and the role of the county through its Storm Water
Permit. The Regional Board's decision to impose storm water permits on the cities will have a major
impact on the program.
Mr. Anderson said that he thought it was important that the District take an active part in the
development of this county-wide program before it was forced on the agency.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS—Items (A-D)
A. Status of Orange County's Storm Water Permit.
This item will be discussed at the next Ad Hoc Committee meeting on
February 28, 2002.
B. Discussion on the District's Cooperative Projects Program to Fund Urban Runoff
Diversion and Treatment Projects.
This program could be a possible funding source, but only if there are impacts to
1/I. Changes to the program would require a policy change by the District's Board
of Directors. This item will be discussed further at the next Ad Hoc Committee
meeting.
C. Proposition 218,"Right to Vote on Taxes Act"—Overview and Impacts to
Proposed Charter.
Scott Baugh, legislative consultant,discussed the consequences of the wording
change to the charter and impacts of Proposition 218 on this program. At this
time it is unclear whether Proposition 218 applies to charging a fee for treating
urban runoff. A ruling would be required to determine whether any fee was a
4
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting
Page 3
January 24, 2002
'regulatory' or a 'property' (ownership)fee. There could be challenges to the
District's treating urban runoff as it is not now allowed by charter. An amendment
to the charter would be required, and because of the timing,a bill would have to
be introduced within the next week to get on this year's legislative calendar.
C. Recommend a Legislative Proposal to Change District's Charter to Address
Urban Runoff.
At the January 23, 2002 Board Meeting,the Directors authorized the Ad Hoc
Committee to review the proposed wording of the charter change and the
ramifications of the program. While the amended wording provides for the
authorization to provide urban runoff treatment, it does not require the District to
implement the program. How the program is dealt with can be determined at a
later date. The pros and cons of the wording were discussed.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Authorize legislative consultant to
submit amended charter language as proposed for inclusion in the District's
charter.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting is scheduled for February 28, 2002 at 3 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting `
Page 4
January 24,2002
S mitted by:
J Tappan, Cornet to Secretary
G:W EIeMWnW Wtllbe(Mxn4NslUrean PoxwTOfYI02 ba�AJNa CarvM�Ba Mlwbidx
Draft
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2002 - 5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on February 6, 2002, in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager
James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Tony Kawashima Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager
Anna Piercy Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Tod Ridgeway Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager
Paul Walker Rob Thompson, Process Controls Manager
Vicki Henn, Engineer
Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
Don Bankhead Others:
Debbie Cook
Brad Hogin, General Counsel
Randy Fuhrrnan
Doug Korthoff
Joey Racano
Jan Vandersloot
Lori Lowder
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Doug Korthoff and Joey Racano addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues and
opposition to the waiver.
r
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
February 6, 2002
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the December 5, 2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed.
Directors Pat McGuigan, Anna Piercy, Tod Ridgeway and Shirley McCracken abstained.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager had no report. However, he briefly responded to inaccurate statements
made under public comments with regard to the Districrs monitoring program and turbidity
meters.
(7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
a. OMTS02-01 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on
regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical
Services Department.
b. OMTS02-02 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report,which
focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for
Operations and Maintenance Department.
C. OMTS02-03 Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Committee Business:A motion to
approve and adopt Rules of Procedure, as set forth in District Resolution
No. OCSD 01-23, as the Rules of Procedure of the Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee.
d. OMTS02-04 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a Professional Services
Agreement with Black and Veatch to provide engineering services for the
design and installation support of Primary Clarifier Drive Replacement,
Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation, Job No. SP-73,
for an amount not to exceed $353,000.
e. OMTS02-05 Recommend to the Board of Directors to award a sole source contract
with Hill Brothers Chemical Company for the Purchase of Magnesium
Hydroxide Solution,for the period of March 18, 2002 through June 30,
2002,for an estimated amount not to exceed $95,000.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to approve the recommended
actions for items speed as 7(a)through (e)under Consent Calendar.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
t Page 3
February 6, 2002
(8) ACTION ITEMS
a. OMTS02-06 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve additional funding for
Cooperative Projects for FY2001-02 Phase II related to inflow and
infiltration reduction in the amount of$3,480,206, increasing the total
FY2001-02 funding amount from $2,555,213 to$6,035,419, as
recommended by the Guidance Review Committee
Director McGuigan gave a brief report on the need for additional funding
for projects that required immediate attention.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
b. OMTS02-07 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve an Increase in
Cooperative Projects funding for sewer rehabilitation work with Sunset
Beach Sanitary District, Contract No. CP-0118, in the amount of$21,920,
increasing the project from $47,800 to an amount not to exceed $69,720.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
C. OMTS02-08 Recommend to the Board of Directors to:
(1) Suspend the payment of$15,500 per month for an escrow
extension into an account(ADAM431)with First American Title
Company for lost opportunity compensation during the
performance of due diligence on ICOR; and,
(2) Continue to conduct due diligence research of the ICOR site for
the use as a biosolids composting option.
Mike Moore, ECM Manager,gave a brief report on the reasons for not
going forward at this time with a recommendation for the purchase of the
ICOR site. The report prepared by Arthur Anderson raised concerns with
a low rate of return on the investment dollars. However, due diligence
research would continue and the Directors would be kept apprised of the
findings. Also discussed was the need for a development agreement with
the City of Colton.
Mr. Moore also gave a brief update on the District's biosolids application
at the Ave Kwa'Ame Farms in Imperial County.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
Director Kawashima abstained on Item 8(c)(1).
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee 9
Page 4
February 6, 2002
(9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. OMTS02-09 Ocean Discharge Issues Update
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported the data from the testing should be
available to the Directors in April. A request for proposals had been sent out for an
independent review of all of the collected data.
b. OMTS02-10 Update on District's Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System
(SCADA)
Rob Thompson, Process Controls manager, gave a brief presentation and overview of
the District's Process Control System and the interaction with the District's networking
infrastructure. The system is highly reliable for the operation of both treatment plants.
C. OMTS02-11 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement re Groundwater Replenishment
System, Job No. J-36
Brad Hogin, General Counsel, gave an overview of key components of the proposed
development, operation and maintenance agreement with Orange County Water District.
Directors requested a copy of his presentation material for reference.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Patrick Miles, Director of InformationTechnology, reported Interviews with prospective
consultants for the JD Edwards system would begin the following day. He also reported
last year the Directors had authorized $400,000 for the purchase of an IBM AS400
Model 820. Bids had been received with the low bid coming in at$270,000.
(11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported the American Taxi
Company had lost their contract with the airport. Therefore,the sale of compressed
natural gas was minimal at the District's facility. Staff was looking into ways to draw in
new customers.
Mr. Dolan also reported that there Is an"El Nino" prediction for a few months from now
which could cause an increase in plant flows.
(12) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
The Director of Technical Services had no report.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
February 6,2002
(13) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
Use Murphy, Communications Manager, reported on the study session with the Fullerton
City Council regarding the ocean discharge issues. She reported the council requested
a resolution supporting secondary treatment be agendized for their next meeting.
Ms. Murphy also reported a meeting was held earlier that day with public information
officers and other key staff members of the various cities and agencies within the
District's jurisdiction, providing them with information on the ocean discharge issues.
The Directors were given videos produced by Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
that Director McGuigan had seen on cable television recently. The documentary is
hosted by Huell Howser.
(14) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel had no report.
(15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
March 6, 2002 at 5 p.m.
(16) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee b
Page 6
February 6, 2002
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Submitted by: -
L�' g
Penny M. Kyle
Operations, Maintenance abd Technical Services
Committee Secretary
GMvp.dtMaWda\0MTSX200112001 OMrS Mlnulest720501 mtnules.dw
OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date ToBd.ofDir.
2/6/02 2/27/02
AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe Item Number
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert J. Doter, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Victoria Henn, Engineer
SUBJECT: PLANT NO. 2 PRIMARY CLARIFIER DRIVE REPLACEMENT, JOB NO.
P2-85, AND SLUDGE BLANKET INDICATOR INSTALLATION, JOB
NO. SP-73.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Black and Veatch to provide
engineering services for the design and installation support of the Primary Clarifier Drive
Replacement, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation, Job No. SP-73,
for an amount not to exceed $353,000.
SUMMARY
• Staff recommends installation of new clarifier drives to replace failing equipment
and the installation and automation of the sludge level sensing equipment in
fourteen primary clarifiers at plant No. 2.
• The two capital project budgets, 132-85 and SP-73, were approved in the FY
2001/02 Budget.
• The Professional Service Agreement includes preparation of design reports, bid
documents and engineering support services during equipment installation.
• Requests for proposals were sent to four consulting firms. Three firms submitted
proposals: Black and Veatch, Damon S. Williams Associates, and R. W. Beck.
The fourth declined to propose.
• A team of District engineers and managers reviewed, evaluated, and ranked the
three proposals.
• Staff recommends approval of the PSA with Black and Veatch for a total amount
not to exceed $353,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The engineering services will not exceed $353,000. The total project budget is
$5,840,000 and $364,000 for Capital Projects P2-85 and SP-73, respectively. This PSA
is an anticipated expense and there is sufficient funding for this agreement.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 Budget section B. page 7 Protect Nos.
P2-85 and SP-73)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Plant No. 2 has fourteen (14) circular primary clarifiers labeled Basins D through Q. The
mechanical drives operating the sludge and scum collectors in the circular clarifiers are
beyond their useful life and are showing signs of significant wear and several have
experienced failure. Basin F is now out of service and is being repaired.
The clarifier drive replacement project consists of:
A. An initial survey of facilities to perform an assessment of the physical condition of
each primary basin drive, and prioritize replacement of the clarifier drives. The
Consultant will evaluate drives of various manufacture and recommend replacement
units.
B. Design of sludge blanket level indicators, including electrical, instrumentation, and
coordination of programming changes to the existing Plant Automation System. The
indicators will be used initially for level indication and alarms monitored at a central
location. Future projects may provide automatic sludge pumping control using the
sludge blanket indicator.
C. A summary Preliminary Design Report will be prepared.
D. Plans, specifications and construction cost estimates will be prepared.
E. Bid phase and construction phase services will be provided.
F. During construction, while each clarifier is empty, a detailed evaluation of other
existing clarifier components is to be performed, and a report submitted. This report
will be used as base information for scoping future primary treatment projects.
Staff received proposals from three firms on November 30, 2001: Black and Veatch, R.
W. Beck, and Damon S. Williams Associates. Carollo Engineers declined to submit.
Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals on December 21, 2001. No interviews were
conducted. Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with
Black and Veatch for the design and construction support of the Drive Replacement and
Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation at Plant No. 2, for an amount not to exceed
$353,000.
G:�. dW�Wdaa dAun Repn=2e ,r nM.Repauexoziinn»(c)ax VnM.adc
Ruud. ..' Page 2
Black and Veach was ranked the highest technically by the proposal review team. They
have a well developed understanding of the work and described detailed approaches for
performing the work elements. They included measures in their proposal that have
potential construction cost savings. For example,they elaborated on a
rebuild/rehabilitation cycle versus purchasing all new units outright.
The proposed team members have specific experience with clarifiers and sludge/scum
removal, etc., and specialty services such as structural and corrosion components are
well covered.
As information, the Black and Veatch team also had the lowest fee proposal. Fee
proposals ranged from $353,000 to $668,676. Because several proposed team
members are familiar with the Plant 2 facilities and the Districts design guidelines, the
review team feels that the fee proposed by Black and Veatch is comprehensive and
realistic.
Design will take approximately seven months and will begin within two weeks after the
approval. The completion of construction is estimated to be June of 2003.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not replace the clarifier drive equipment. This alternative would leave an increasing
number of secondary clarifiers at Plant No. 2 unavailable while being repaired by the
maintenance staff.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is a maintenance type capital project for an existing facility and is exempt
from CEQA per Section 15301 (b).
ATTACHMENTS
Staff Evaluation of Proposals.
G:My.ElclyenEe�BomO A Ufbpontl3ao]mem gpenm wpamNxoanem�Nq.�ei*vnw.aa
W"+ Page 3
TABLE 1.0
Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement and SBI design (P2-85, SP-73)
STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
FIRM MSE-RW Beck B&V DSWA
Reviewer 1 229 279 285
Reviewer 2 199 280 248
Reviewer 3 231 233 214
Reviewer 248 227 238
Total Score (1400 Points Max.) 907 1019 985
Average Score (350 Points Max.) 227 255 246
Proposed Construction Completion Date Mar-03 May-03 Jan-04
Proposed Person Hours 4316 3046 6102
Proposed not to exceed Fee $476,455 $353,000 $668,676
CADocumenls and SetlingsWyle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK10\[Tabulation of Staff Evaluation of Proposals.zls]Sheetl
OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date Toad.of Dir.
22 2 I127102
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number
oMrs02-0s is
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Originator: MarcoPolo S. Velasco, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE FOR CORROSION AND
ODOR CONTROL IN THE NEWPORT TRUNKLINE
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Award a sole source contract with Hill Brothers Chemical Company, for the purchase of
Magnesium Hydroxide solution, for the period of March 18, 2002 through June 30,
2002, for an estimated amount not to exceed $95,000,00.
SUMMARY
• Because of the high hydrogen sulfide levels, which cause odor and pipeline
corrosion and the recent structural failures in two of the Newport trunklines, staff
recommends that we implement continuous treatment in that system to control
hydrogen sulfide. This treatment will significantly reduce corrosion in the 8 miles of
sewer pipe being treated, as well as control odor complaints for less cost than
current downstream treatment.
• The Districts current collection system odor and sulfide control program consists of
periodic slug dosing with caustic soda, which does not provide complete or
continuous protection of the trunklines.
• Staff has done field research to select appropriate chemicals for collections trunk
sewer application.
• Implementing upstream treatment with magnesium hydroxide will offset caustic soda
dosing in that trunkline system and hydrogen peroxide treatment as the trunkline
enters Plant No. 2. The estimated cost saving for these two chemicals is
approximately $135,000, which completely offsets the cost of the new chemical.
• Staff recommends the sole source purchase of magnesium hydroxide for odor and
corrosion control in the Newport trunkline because it represents the lowest cost
option of the three applicable chemicals researched. In addition the chemical is the
least costly to site, and poses the lowest risk to the environment.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The General Manager is seeking Board approval to award the magnesium hydroxide
solution contract to Hill Brothers Chemical Company, for an estimated amount not to
exceed $95,000.00; which includes the cost of chemicals, chemical feed equipment
installation and removal and monitoring.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As part of a continuing effort to improve the collection system odor and corrosion control
program, the District evaluated in the summers of 2000 and 2001, the odor control
treatment effectiveness of six chemicals in four of our problem trunklines (including the
Newport system). The results of the study showed that only three of the six chemicals
would be good candidates for odor and corrosion control in the four sewer trunk lines
evaluated, based upon their ability to treat to desired levels. These three chemicals are
calcium nitrate (Bioxide), magnesium hydroxide and combination of ferrous
chloride/hydrogen peroxide.
Once a contract is awarded, chemical treatment with magnesium hydroxide should
begin in approximately 7 days. Table 1 below provides a summary of the chemical
usage and costs for the 3 chemicals that were considered for this treatment location.
Chemical Daily Usage Unit Cost for Daily Cost Annual Cost Hazard
(gpd) Chemical ($/day) ($/year)
$I al.
Magnesium 600 1.25 750 274,000 Non-
Hydroxide hazardous
Calcium 600 1.75 1,400 511,000 Mild
Nitrate Oxidizer
Ferrous 1250, 110 0.45, 1.72 750 274,000 Acid, Strong
Chloride & Oxidizer
Hydrogen
Peroxide
The contract period for this chemical is recommended to end on June 30. 2002 to co-
incide with the beginning of a new 1-year contract period (July 1, 2002—June 30, 2003)
for odor & corrosion control in the collection system, including the Newport system.
GM,yAbupvds�M �m Aq/ e�W30 13(d)-MIP dlien.Yac
ftwm:wmai Page 2
ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives include selecting one of the other chemicals listed above or do nothing.
The other chemicals do not provide the equivalent cost effectiveness, or present siting
and safety concerns that need to be addressed. The do nothing option results in further
corrosion to the system and likely future structural failures of the trunklines in this
system.
CiEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
None
G:\'^ AW%geMeIBmN AMU 110WI DJ3B MA .PoMIIWI)Me I3I01WII Brt M M
FUNSM: WWI Page 3
OMTS COMMITTEE Meetln1Date Toae.otoo-.
2/6/02 2/27/02
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
OKTS02-06 _13[e] _
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve additional funding for Cooperative Projects for FY2001-02 Phase It related to
inflow and infiltration reduction in the amount of$3,480,206, increasing the total
FY2001-02 funding amount from $2,555,213 to $6,035,419, as recommended by the
Guidance Review Committee.
SUMMARY
• In November 2001, 23 proposals were received from cities and sanitary districts for
Orange County Sanitation District (District)funding of Cooperative Projects, with
requests totaling, approximately $6,000,000.
• The Guidance Review Committee (GRC) has reviewed the requests and
recommends funding 17out of 23 projects submitted for a total of$3,480,206. These
projects include 8 projects in the construction category and 9 projects in the study
category. The remaining projects were not recommended for approval by the GRC.
• The GRC evaluated the proposals based on potential benefits to the District,
including: (1) Savings to the District due to reduced infiltration flow; (2) Reduction in
peak flow (inflow); (3) Environmental benefits; and (4) Development of information to
aid the District in evaluating future Cooperative Projects applications.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See the attached Budget Information Table and Program Approved and Proposed
Budget Summary Table.
Fifty-six projects totaling approximately$8.8 Million were approved for funding through
September 2001. At this time, authorization for expenditure of$3,480,206 is being
requested for the 17 projects recommended for funding by the Guidance Review
Committee. If approved, the total approved funding would increase to $12,325,493 as
shown on the attached Budget Information Table.
a:Nyaia�gendM, rd Agen Aew s=026oamn me FeWdaN Zl0 13(e),Go mue v Ire sd«
aa.,:ea: a DW Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: Section 8—Page 154)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The attached Budget Information Table indicates a transfer of$5,722 from the Design
staff line to the Consultant PSA line to cover additional flow monitoring efforts. The
overall budget total remains unchanged.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Cooperative Projects Program (Program)was established in 1998 to realize the
Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Strategic Plan goal for inflow and
infiltration (1&1) reduction. The Program is generally focused on reducing peak flows
experienced at the District's treatment plants. The I&I element in the Strategic Plan has
a goal to reduce wet weather peaks experienced at the District's two wastewater
treatment facilities by 20% over the next 20 years.
Once a year, the local agencies have an opportunity to apply for Program funds.
Funding includes grants and low interest loans for up to 50%of the total project cost for
projects that help reduce flows into the District's system. Currently, the Guidance
Review Committee (GRC) oversees the implementation of the Program. The GRC is
comprised of the following members: District Board of Directors Steve Anderson, Jim
Ferryman, and Pat McGuigan; District General Manager Blake Anderson, and Design
Manager Jim Herberg; Seal Beach City Manager John Bahorski; Garden Grove City
Manager George Tindall; and Midway City Sanitary District General Manager Ron
Briles. Applications are first reviewed by the GRC and projects with merit are forwarded
to the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services (OMTS) Committee for funding
consideration. Upon receiving a recommendation for approval by the OMTS, the
applications are moved to the District's Board of Directors for approval.
At the December 2001 meeting of the GRC, applications for FY2001-02 Phase 11 were
presented for review. The attached District Program 2001-2002 Phase 11 Application
Summary Table lists the local agencies and their proposed cooperative projects. The
table lists the local agency, a brief project description, project funding request,
estimated 1/1 reduction, estimated financial benefit to the District, evaluation score and
anticipated payment period. Financial benefits are calculated for I&I reduction projects.
Infiltration reduction project benefits are based on estimated rates of groundwater
infiltration into the sewer multiplied by the District's estimated annual savings of$0.11
per gallon, per day, per year. Inflow reduction project benefits are based on the
District's estimated avoided capital construction costs at $0.90 per gallon of peak flow
capacity. The savings estimate and other factors listed in the table were taken into
account by the GRC in determining which projects would be eligible for District funding.
The project recommendations are noted in the Application Summary Table.
Purchase of flow metering equipment was added to the list of approved projects by the
GRC at the December meeting.
G\p.EbNOenEe10wr0 A,e .Rey t..Board A,.ReGw1YO30Ml lNfl Ccg ', -Pr ,d-
Re„. WOM8 Page 2
ALTERNATIVES
Reject some or all submitted applications. This alternative may not allow for the
implementation of the Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) reducing measures identified in the
Strategic Plan. Ultimately, rejecting all projects could hinder the long-term goal of
reducing I&I by 20% and cause additional treatment costs avoided in the Strategic Plan.
CEQA FINDINGS
The local agencies are responsible for compliance with CEQA as part of the
Cooperative Projects Program.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. OCSD Cooperative Projects Program Approved and Proposed Budget Summary
Table
3. OCSD Cooperative Projects Program Evaluation Criteria
4. OCSD Cooperative Projects Program FY 2001-02 Phase II Application Summary
Table
PK:jo:sa
G:wq.44`+panEe�Beara q�nN PepW�['W2 BouO FBeMa PepoMc'�Nlwn f3(aF�we+euw hgeds.Eac
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM
JOB NO. J-73
W,
0FUGlY,A.L, CO NI
PROJECTI'M41K. 'A
iU6
. .... n-1
Project Development $ 49.560 $ 49,560 $ 49,660 $ 49,560 $ 42,702 86%
Design Staff $ 340,000 $ 471.440 $ 471,440 $ 471.440 $ (5.722) $ 465,718 .$ 164,928 35%
Consultant PSA $ 480.000 $ 299.000 $ 299.000 $ 74,235 It 5.722 $ 79.957 1$ 79,957 100%
Construction Contract $ $ $ - $ - 0%
Construction(Other) $ 149,170,000 $ 141,855,600 $ 141.855.600 $ 8,845,287 $ 3,480.206 $ 12.326,493 2,381,000 0%
Construction Staff $ $ $ 0%
lContingency 1 $ - $ $ - 0%
ITOTAL $ 149.990,000 $ 142,675.600 $ 1-42.675.600 1 $ 9,440.5221 $ 3,480,2081 $ 12920728 $ 2.668.587
C:THeNeWPjJ-73 BWgetlratA Feb 2002 OMTS010402AS]015b0.
OCSD COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM r
Approved and Proposed Agency Funding Summary `
Program Approved Anticipated Year of Reimbursement
Year Funding 99100 00101 01102 02/03 03104
FY 99/00 $2,257,656 $147,5D0 $1,010,664 .$1,099,492
FY 00/01 $4,032,418 $2,459,818 $1,572,600
FY 01/02 PHASE 1 $2,555,213 $318.250 $2,236,963
FY 01102 PHASE II $3,480,206 $1,662,940 $1,817,266
TOTAL $12,325,493 $147,500 $1,010,664 $3,877,560 $5,472,503 $1,817,266
(')Proposed
OCSD COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM
Evaluation Criteria
Agency Application# Project Category
Cost Benefit: Reduction of Flow Total Points
Payback less than 7 Years (infiltration projects) 150
Payback between 7 and 20 Years (infiltration projects) 75
Peak Flow Reduction greater than 10 MGD (infiltration, peak shaving) 150
Peak Flow Reduction between 1 MGD and 10 MGD (infikration,peak shaving) 75
Peak Flow Reduction under$0.90/gallon 50
Payback over 20 years or Peak Reduction over$0.90/gallon 0
Funding Requested
Grant Funding 0
Combination— Low Interest Loan and Grant 25
Low Interest Loan 50
Environmental Benefit
Reduces Sewage Leakage Potential 25
Identification/Elimination of Illegal Connections 25
Sewer Maintenance Program 25
Studies/Investigations
GIS Mapping 50
Sewer Master Plan with 1/1 Element 50
1/1 Identification Equipment (CCTV, Smoke testing, etc.) 50
Water Conservation Programs 50
Other OCSD Program Goals and Objectives
Are there other overriding considerations for this project?
Description:
Yes
No p
TOTAL PROJECT POINTS
Revised:January 2001
G:Wp.ftWnVOSS&00N GTSUJW-73 FROGR ANn FORM512000 Eval.b.F..fy014122-1-01.d.
OCSO COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM
FY 2001-2002 PHASE II APPLICATION SUMMARY
AGENCY PROJECT PROJECTDESCRIPRON FUNDING 0 PAYBACK ANNUAL TOTAL RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED DISTRIBUTION
NO REQUEST REDUCTION YEARS SAVINGS SCORE FCR FUNDING YEAR
GPO $NyJ,R FUNDING
Construction Projects
City of Buena Park 1 Sewer Rehabilitation $8,250 75M 9.7 848 100 Yes $8.250 FY 02-03
City of Buena Park 3Sewer lining $193.000 2175DO 15.7 24578 100 Yes $193,0D0 FY 02.03
City of Huntington Beach 5Sewer Lining 3581,139 UK UK UK UK Yes $581,139 FY 03-04
City of Huntington Beach(1) 6 Storm Drain Replacement $2,102,136 336570 $8.250GAL NA 0 No $0 NA
City of La Habra B Sawer Replacement $125,000 UK UK UK UK Yes $125.000 FY 02-03
City of La Habra 9 Sewer Lining and Replacement $385.500 UK UK UK UK Yes $355.500 FY 03-04
City of Orange 11 Storm Drain Replacement $132,OD095.300 GAL III.36fOAL NA 25 Yes $132.000 FY 03-04
City of Orange 12 Storm Drain Replacement $100.500 14200 GAL $0.881GAL NA 25 Yes 5100,50D FY 03-04
Rossmoodi-os Alamitos SO 14 Sewer Rehabilitation $108.100 0 NA NA 0 No $0 NA
City of Santa Ana 19 Sewer Replacement $262.500 0 NA NA 0 No $0 NA
CRY of Santa Ana 20 Sewer Lining $42.000 0 NA NA 0 No $0 NA
City of Seal IN arh 22 Pump Station Replacement $65,000 0 NA NA 0 No $0 NA
City of Seal Beach 23 Sewer Replacement $226,875 30,800 82 2784 25 Yes 5228,875 FY 03-04
Subtotal $4.332,000 $1.752264
SludieslOMer
City of Buena Park 2New Flow Meters SI0,000 NA NA NA UK Yes 670,000 FY 02-03
CRY of Cypress 4 Flow Monitoring $25,000 NA NA NA 50 Yes $25.000 FY 02-03
City of La Habra 7 New Flow Meters 54.500 NA NA NA UK Yes $4,500 FY D2-03
Midway City SD 10 Master Plan,CCTV,Flaw Monitoring $1270.000 NA NA NA 100 Yes $1270.000 FY 02-03
City of Placentia 13 Master Plan,CCTV,Flow Monitoring $95.002 NA NA NA 50 Yes $95,002 FY 03-04
Roasmoorkas Alamitos SO 15 Flow Monitoring $21250 NA NA NA 50 Yes $21,250 FY 03.04
RossmoorA.w Alamitos SO 16 CCTV $27,190 NA NA NA 50 Yes $27.190 FY 02-03
RossmoorlLos Alamilos ED 17 Website $4.000 NA NA NA 0 No s0 NA
City of Santa Ana 18 CCTV $75.000 NA NA NA 50 Yes $76.000 FY03-04
COY of Santa Ana 21 GIS Mapping $200,000 NA NA NA 50 Yes $200,000 FY 03-04
Subtotal $1.731.942 57.727,992
TOTAL $8,063,542 $3,45111,306
Notes:
NA-Not Appkceble
UK-Unknown
(1)-Anaysis based on 1 year,30 mounts storm
1
OMTS COMMITTEE MeeOng Date To9O.of Dir.
2/O6/02 2/27102
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
OMT502-07 13
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve an increase in Cooperative projects funding for sewer rehabilitation work with
Sunset Beach Sanitary District Contract No. CP-0118, in the amount of$21,920, increasing
the project from $47,800 to an amount not to exceed $69,720.
SUMMARY
• The Orange County Sanitation District (District) implemented the Cooperative Projects
Program in 1999.
• The program provides funds to the local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate
inflow and infiltration (I/1) to the sewer collection system.
• The Board of Directors approved a funding request of$47,800 for Contract No. CP-0118
on June 27, 2001. When bids were taken for the project on November 8, 2001, the
costs were higher than expected. It is now requested that District funding be increased
by$21,920 to $69,720.
• Although the payback period is longer, the Guidance Review Committee (GRC) still
believes the project is viable for environmental reasons.
• The GRC recommends approval of the funding increase.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See the attached Budget Information Table. At this time, authorization for expenditure of
$21,920 is being requested. If approved, the total approved funding would Increase to
$12,347,413 provided OMTS Committee Agenda Item No. 8(a) is also approved by the
Board of Directors.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section e, Page 164)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is$142,675,600, and
will be spent over the next 18 years on projects that reduce inflow/infiltration (1/1) throughout
the Orange County Sanitation District(District). The proposed project change does not
impact the project budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0118 was sent to Sunset Beach Sanitary
District (SBSD) on October 3, 2001 for signature. This project includes lining of 1,620 feet
of 6-inch sewer in alleyways that are in close proximity to the beach. Prior to signing the
contract, SBSD advertised the project and received bids on November 8, 2001. Due to an
unfavorable bidding environment, the bids came in higher than had previously been
experienced on other sewer lining projects by this agency. Limited funding sources within
the community would make it difficult for SBSD to proceed with this project. As such, the
SBSD Board of Directors is requesting that the District increase the funding for this project.
The funding increase would increase the payback period from 25 to 37 years. Although the
payback is higher than the 20-year benchmark, it is recommended for approval based on
overriding environmental considerations. The existing sewer system is quite old and is in
poor condition. The observed high infiltration/Inflow(1/1) in the proposed project represents
a source of pollution that could result in beach closures due to its close proximity to the
ocean. Other projects in coastal communities have been approved for the same reasons at
payback periods that were substantially greater than the payback period for this project.
One of the District's goals is to reduce sources of pollution that could result in beach
contamination. The Cooperative Projects Program provides a mechanism to reach this
goal. Approval of this timely project will help the District in meeting its goal.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the funding increase. Not approving the funding increase would make it
financially difficult for Sunset Beach Sanitary District to proceed with the proposed project of
reducing 1/1 within Sunset Beach Sanitary District.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable. Local agencies are responsible for CEQA compliance.
ATTACHMENT
Budget Information Table
PK:jo:jak:sa
G:Wq.d.I.M.�Id Al-.Reg =2E Id A1.1de Re ft=DMt S(l)Su dBeatl,Snn D.d.
Ren en:dead, Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM
JOB NO. J-73
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 49.560 $ 49,560 $ 49,560 $ 49,560 $ 42,702 86%
Design Staff $ 340,000 $ 471.440 $ 471,440 $ 465,718 $ 465.718 $ 164.928 35%
Consultant PSA $ 480,000 $ 299,000 $ 299.000 $ 79.957 $ 79,957 $ 79,957 1D0%
Construction Contract $ $ $ - $ 0%
Construction(Other) $ 149,170.0D0 $ 141,855.600 $ 141,855,600 $ 12,325.493 $ 21.920 $ 12.347,413 $ 2,381,000 0%
Construction Staff $ $ $ 0%
Contingency $ $ $ 0%
TOTAL $ 149.990,000 $ 142,675.600 $ - $ 142.675.600 $ 12,920,72. 1 21.920 $ 12,942,648 IS 2,668.587 21%
C Tib iMVIPXJ 73 Budget Tanta Fat 20020MTS SB 01 W0].FIslCisb
OMTS COMMITTEE Mee Ung Date To ad.or Dir.
2/6/02 02/27/02
AGENDA REPORT item Number Item Number
OWS02-08 DIM
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Layne T. Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist
SUBJECT: Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Suspend the payment of$15,500 per month for an escrow extension into an account
(ADAM431)with First American Title Company for lost opportunity compensation
during the performance of due diligence on ICOR.
2. Continue to conduct due diligence research of the ICOR site for the use as a
biosolids composting option.
SUMMARY
Staff contracted with the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen to perform a financial
analysis of the proposed deal points and the detailed business plan for the ICOR
project. Arthur Andersen issued a Draft Report that determined that the District's
participation in the ICOR joint venture had "several significant economic issues that
should be addressed prior to approving the proposed investment." These issues
included the reliability of green waste feedstocks and markets for end products, the
likelihood of initial operating losses and profitability of the venture, and unaccounted for
host fees and property taxes.
Arthur Andersen concluded that these issues were important enough to require that the
proposed ICOR venture be rethought or renegotiated by the District. In light of the
Arthur Andersen report, staff recommends that the District suspend the "lost
opportunity" payment of$15,500 per month for an escrow extension into an account
with First American Title Company. The District has paid into this account since
September 2001. Staff proposes to continue to conduct due diligence research on the
issues raised by Arthur Andersen. Staff strongly believes that ICOR still provides the
District with a viable biosolids composting option but that more information and
permitting is needed before we are ready to recommend this project to the Board of
Directors. One possible outcome of the decision to suspend payment is that ]CDR may
seek private funding for the project and the District may lose the opportunity to partner
on the project.
n I.AW%,e .,...re n,N.Peoons¢aox ewre naeea aepcM1SWzo3leem f 3101 COR eac
a"... a OV Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY ,
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: #86, Joint Operating Fund Budget)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
The Board may direct staff to continue to pay the escrow fee in order to keep the ICOR
option open or to consider options for proceeding with the project. Staff recognizes that
this action poses significant risk to the project and that OCSD may very well lose the
opportunity to participate in the ICOR project as it is currently structured. In the
meantime, staff has identified enough capacity for managing the District's biosolids for
the next few years. The District is embarking on a strategic planning effort to evaluate
long-term options, both on-site and off-site, for managing its biosolids.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA review in the form of an addendum to an existing Environmental Impact Report
will have to be performed on the 22.74-acre.
ATTACHMENTS
> Staff Report
G.%yUWb g Wn WAge R�QM Ba A,.R¢p S0nVl 1] )ICORE
ae,« �1 Page 2
January 25, 2002
STAFF REPORT
Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR)
Background
The viability of the land application of Class B biosolids' in California beyond January
2003 is in serious doubt. These regulatory developments resulted in the District
retaining the services of Carollo Engineers to assist in the development of a short-tens
biosolids management plan (Plan)to meet the impending Class B phaseout. On
July 20, 2001, Carollo Engineers submitted the Plan that analyzed numerous different
biosolids management technologies so that the District could maintain its policy of
providing environmentally sound biosolids management with an emphasis on
maintaining multiple, independent reuse alternatives. The Plan recommended the
following technologies as having the most apparent probability of success:
• Composting,
• Chemical Stabilization,
• Out of State Land Application, and
• Thermal Drying.
These technologies were then evaluated in greater detail in order to develop the
recommendations for the Plan. The following criteria were used to evaluate the
conceptual treatment, hauling, and beneficial use/disposal processes of each of the
technologies:
• Proven technology
• Cost-effectiveness
• Political and public acceptability
• Reduced environmental impacts
• Marketability of final product
• Compatibility with existing District processes
• Energy utilization
• Capability of being operational before January 2003
As a result of this Plan, the District has entered into a contract with California Soil
Products to chemically stabilize biosolids and modified contracts with the Yakima
Company and Synagro to land apply Class B biosolids in Arizona. The Plan
recommended composting, and specifically ICOR, as the biosolids management
process that had the highest probability of successful implementation.
' Class B biosoiids are biosolids that have been processed to achieve a significant pathogen reduction
(e.g., using anaerobic digestion as performed at the District)and meets vector attraction reduction
requirements.
o+.v er•aa��Ae•m na xs�xom emm�mm w�awxanuem�Het�a:
"^' ° Page 3
The District, and its consultants, has been performing due diligence on an offer to join
as a partner in a composting operation with ICOR. ICOR is corporate entity with
established entitlements including a Conditional Use Permit and a certified
Environmental Impact Report, permits in process, and business markets. ICOR has
been in development and planning since 1995 when the 72 acres of real property, that
is the core of the facility; an additional 23 acres is needed for an enclosed biosolids
composting facility. Carollo Engineers has reviewed the engineering of the proposed
facility, CB Richard Ellis, Inc. has appraised the property and Arthur Andersen has
performed a financial analysis of the proposed deal points.
Proposed ICOR Deal Points Analyzed
The 72-acre ICOR site consists of two parcels of 17 and 55 acres respectively. An
additional parcel of 22.74 acres that is essential for the siting and construction of the
enclosed compost building is currently in escrow. This property has been in escrow
with ICOR since January 2001 and the escrow was scheduled to close on September 1,
2001. The escrow has been extended for a $500 per day "lost opportunity fee". The
District has been paying this fee since September 1, 2001 to keep the option open on
this parcel during the due diligence process. This additional land will be subject to
CEQA and permitting and will increase the total facility size to just under 95 acres.
Development of the ICOR composting facility would require that the District purchase
the 22.74 acre parcel for the construction of an enclosed composting building and
support facilities, and purchase 17-acres of the existing 72acre site for the construction
of compost curing and storage facilities.
Under the proposal, the District would own two of the three parcels (the 17-acre and
22.74-acre parcels)that will comprise the composting site. This would provide the
District with land and the vast majority of the capital improvements that are to be built on
the site. The District's investment of$5.8 million for the purchase of the17-acre and
22.74-acre parcels would be secured not only by its own value, but also by the
remaining 55 acres of the proposed compost site. Valuation services provided by CB
Richards Ellis, Inc, appraisal the 17-acre and 22.74-acre parcels at$5.1 million,
excluding the value of the permits.
District's staff and Carollo Engineers have reviewed the compost facility design. The
design is for a fully enclosed active composting facility with the ability to process
approximately 700 tons per day of biosolids, and 1,000 tons per day of greenwaste for a
total of 1,700 tons per day. Table 1 summarizes the costs for an enclosed composting
facility that has been reviewed for accuracy by District's staff and Carollo Engineers:
Table 1: Cost for an Enclosed Active Compost Facility
Purchase of 22.74 acres for expansion and buildings $ 1,800,000
Purchase of 17-acre parcel from Ague Manse River Fames, LLP $ 4,000,000
Improvements on the 72-acre site $ 11,061.000
Building and improvements on the 22.74-acre site $ 26,430,000
A 30% contingency on building and improvements $ 11,247,000
Total Cost $ 54.538,000
O:YpYY"tlMOYUIpn!RpaV➢OOtBnk APMRpp4Utl(OTLen 1]rWNAH<oc
nm.a mum Page 4
The proposed annual management cost (not including the capital expense or product
sales income rebate)would start at$22 per wet ton of biosolids for the first two years,
$18 for the next two years, then $15 thereafter adjusted by CPI for the anticipated 300
wet tons of biosolids per day to be managed at ICOR.
Arthur Andersen Financial Analysis
Arthur Andersen performed a financial analysis of the proposed deal points (Table 2),
and the detailed business plan profonna (Model) provided by ICOR. Arthur Andersen
issued a Draft Report that determined that the Distric's participation in the ICOR joint
venture had "several significant economic issues that should be addressed prior to
approving the proposed investment." These issues included:
➢ The capacity of the facility
➢ The future control and supply of green waste
➢ Permitting (See Tables 3 & 4)
➢ Improvement of the 55 acres owned by ICOR
➢ Initial operating losses until the facility reaches its break-even point
➢ Unaccounted for potential host fees and property taxes
➢ Possibility of regulatory change
➢ Ability to sell Class A compost
Arthur Andersen concluded that these issues were important enough to require that the
proposed ICOR venture be rethought and/or renegotiated by the District. Please note
that future biosolids management options and costs are unavailable and may be
considerably more costly. If so, their assessment did not reflect such an assessment.
District's staff believes that the future biosolids management options and costs will be
significantly higher than the current use of our existing Class B operations in both
California and Arizona.
Biosolids Management Alternatives
The District must manage approximately 540 wet tons of biosolids produced every day
from our facilities. Other existing and potentially"sustainable" biosolids management
options were reviewed by District's staff and Carollo Engineers during the development
of the Plan. Figure 1 provides a graphic depiction of each of the biosolids management
options cost and dates of availability for implementation.
Figure 1: Existing and Potential Biosolids Management Option Costs (per wet ton)
GM .ftMpnNBImU ABantle B¢pW1MBY BmNABzxN NWNW]UNlem t]IBI.IL00.tic
ft m.�1 Page 5
$40
i . .
$37 Ban Joel-uin,com n
$35
$34
$33
$32 A P u
I
$28 -rule•R - ' Ke "Oou
$26 7 le a
Nov Feb Jun Jan Jul Jan
2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004
Since the development of the Plan additional potential biosolids management options
identified include:
➢ Disposal of a limited amount of biosolids (anticipated to be in the range of 200 tons
per day)at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in south Orange County for approximately
$33.00 per wet ton
➢ Chemical stabilization at Tule Ranch for approximately$35.00 per wet ton
Conclusion
In light of the Arthur Andersen Report, staff recommends that the District suspend the
payment of$15,000 per month for an escrow extension into an account with First
American Title Company for lost opportunity. Staff also proposes to continue to conduct
due diligence research on the issues raised by Arthur Andersen. Staff strongly believes
that ICOR still provides the District with a viable biosolids composting option. ICOR
staff may seek private funding for the project and offer composting services to the
District at a higher operations and maintenance rate.
The proximity of ICOR to the District and the location within the Santa Ana Watershed
area would provide for local solutions to locally generated wastes and water quality
issues.
c NgCsapenmBm•E aumm FeponS3m1 Bwro aynm aepaYbMSnu•n IN91 CORAoc
Page 6
Table 2: Deal Point Summary Analyzed by Arthur Andersen
OCSD provides $54.5M, of which $5.8M is for 39.74 (22.74 & 17) acres that is secured
by the remaining 55 acres owned by ICOR:
• Purchase of a 22.74acre parcel for$1,800,000
➢ Purchase of a 17-acre parcel from Ague Manse River Fames, LLP for$4,000,00
• Funding for site improvements on the proposed 72-acre ICOR compost site for
$11,061,000
• Funding for improvements on the 22.74-acre enclosed compost site for$26,430,000
• Funding for a 30% contingency for the improvements for an amount not to exceed
$11,247,000
ICOR will design, build and operate the facility for the term of the Agreement
The facility will have a capacity of 700 tons per day(tpd)of biosolids and 1,000 tons per
day of greenwaste in an enclosed active composting facility
OCSD's daily base tonnage for composting will be 300 tpd at a management cost per
ton of$22 for the first two years, $18 for the next two years, then $15 thereafter
adjusted by CPI
The management cost shall be renegotiated in the event regulations materially effect
the unit cost per ton of processing biosolids
OCSD will have additional biosolids composting capacity up the extent of its production
or the facility's capacity at market price
ICOR shall market unused capacity at market price
Market price is defined as $42 per ton or actual if higher than $42
For all tons received over the OCSD's base tonnage of 300 tpd, ICOR shall rebate
OCSD half the difference between the price received and the cost to process
Rebates received from ICOR shall be considered as rent for the land owned by OCSD
OCSD, or its designee, is to have one seat on ICOR's board of directors
No interest shall be charged or paid to either party
A Lease Agreement for the 39.74-acres giving ICOR exclusive use of the land and
improvements for 20 years, with the option of four(4) additional five(5)year options for
the purpose of carrying out its obligations under this Agreement
OCSD will make a good faith effort to provide ICOR an access agreement providing
entry right for the SARI Line to facilitate wastewater discharge requirements
Enter into a Buy/Sell Agreement including giving either party the first right of refusal to
purchase the interests of the other party
Enter into a Biosolids Management Service Agreement for a tens of 20 years plus four
4 five 5 ears extension by mutual agreement
ICOR provides all operating ui ment for biosolids and greenwaste
OCSD agrees to take back and reuse 15% of the co-compost produced and attributable
to OCSD's tonnage of biosolids processed
G WgLblgaW&aE/,pW f4yvn2t02 2�eN apn' DeNMMvn UI911LOR0¢
�^ Page 7
I
ii
Required Entitlements and Permits
Local entitlements are governed and issued by the City of Colton, and with the
exception of the building permits will run concurrently with one another. The process
that requires the longest time frame for completion would determine the time for the
project; therefore CEQA and the addendum to the Elk would dictate the schedule. This
would require a minimum of four to six months, with six months being the most likely
time required.
The application for the permits and entitlements including a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) a variance for an over height building and building permits have been submitted
to and accepted by the City of Colton. Completion of the permitting process should be
before June 2002.
Table 3: ICOR's Development Requirements
City of Colton California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)—Addendum to the
existing Environmental Impact Report EIR
Conditional Use Permit CUP
Variance, for over height building
Development Agreement with Colton —OCSD - ICOR
Building Permits
State of Solid Waste Facility Permit, California Integrated Waste Management
California Board (CIWMB). ICOR has received a Solid Waste Facility Permit
(SWFP)for composting biosolids on the larger 72-acre site and is in
the application process for an expanded permit on the 23 acres.
Wastewater Discharge Requirement, Regional Water Quality Control
Board RWQCB
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) air quality
permits
Table 4: ICOR's Development Time Line for the 23-Acre Site
Addendum to 30 days notice and selection of Consultant(January 15, 2001)
the EIR 60 days completion of data and document
Possible 30 days public comment circulation state clearing house
Possible 30 days response and approval of mitigation measures
CUP Submission of project application
Review by Development Review Committee
Consideration by Planning Commission
Variance Submission of Application
Findings of Fact and consideration by Planning Commission
Development Defined by City Attorney and Staff in direct communication with OCSD
Agreement and ICOR and their respective counsel
CIWMB, California agencies CIWMB, RWQCB and SCAQMD will begin to
RWQCB, process the respective permits upon completion of the CEQA and
SCAQMD CUP. This is a concurrent 120-day process.
OW/p9 ,nftB Aoe Rapwb, B MApeMe Repa4NNNlbn 1]�BIICgPErc
Page 8
11�
' DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Thursday, February 7,2002,at 5 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager
Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Russell Patterson, Vice Chair John Linder, Construction Manager
Laurann Cook Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager
Alice Jempsa Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Beth Krom Jon Thomsic, Project Manager
Jerry Sigler Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair
Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT:
Brad Hogin, General Counsel's Office
Directors Absent: Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor
Mike Alvarez Dennis Kasper
RandyFuhnnan
Bill Butler
Abdul Rashidi
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the December 6, 2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Directors
Sigler, Patterson and Cook abstained.
Y
m
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 2
February 7,2002
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Steve Anderson introduced the new members of the committees, Directors
Mike Alvarez, Laurann Cook, and Jerry Sigler. Director Shirley McCracken, newly elected Vice
Chair, is also a new member of the PDC Committee.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report.
(7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported that the Orange County Water District board of
directors did not have the required six'yes'votes to approve the Construction Management contract
for GWRS. The absence of a signed operations and maintenance agreement was cited as one
reason. Chair Steve Anderson suggested that staff and counsel consider a joint powers agreement
(JPA)agreement in lieu of the operations and maintenance agreement.
(8) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
Lisa Murphy reported on the outreach efforts on the SARI, Backbay, Bushard Trunk and ballast
projects. The SAWPA video was made available to any director that wanted a copy.
(8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel's representative Brad Hogin did not make a report.
(10) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-)
It was moved by Director Sigler that Item j be removed from the Consent Calendar. The motion was
seconded and duly carried.
a. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with
Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on
change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately.
There are two change orders this month for PDC Committee approval.
b. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT
PSA and Addenda Report. This is an Information only item. Action on PSAs and
Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There
were three PSAs and three Addenda approved by the General Manager from
November 23, 2001 through January 24, 2002.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
February 7, 2002
C. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT
Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item.
d. QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT
Quarterly Contract Staffing Assignments Report. This is an information only item.
e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS
REPORT
A Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is
an information only item.
f. QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS)STATUS
REPORT
Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)Status Report. This is an information only
item.
g. PDCO2-01 Recommend to the Board of Directors to accept Fuzzy Filter Pipe
Installation, Job No. SP2000-41,with Olsson Construction Company as
complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and
approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
h. PDCO2-02 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to
Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services,Job No. SP19990022,with MVP
Commercial, Inc.,authorizing an addition of$7,215, increasing the total
contract amount to$93,715;and (2)Accept Tenant Improvements to Fleet
Services,Job No. SP19990022,as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with MVP
Commercial, Inc.
I. PDCO2-03 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment of
$190,000 to Junction Structure Upgrade,Job No. SP2000-29,for a total
budget of$472,200; and (2)Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Junction Structure
Upgrade,Job No. SP2000-29,with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc., authorizing an
addition of$163,552.97 and a time extension of 44 days, increasing the total
contract amount to$352,252.97.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended
actions for items specified as 10(a)through (i) under Consent Calendar.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
i
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 4
February 7, 2002
j. PDCO2-04 Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Committee Business: A motion to
approve and adopt Rules of Procedure, as set forth in District Resolution No.
OCSD-01-23, as the Rules of Procedure of the Planning, Design, and
Construction Committee.
Director Sigler asked that the committee members consider removing the time
limitations for directors'comments from Res. No. OCSD 01-23, in Section 1,
paragraph E.(4)(d),-(f)and the second sentence in E.(6). The concern was
the possibility that free and open discussions might be curtailed, and it could
limit the full exploration of issues. Counsel Hogin discussed the reasons for
including the wording in the resolution and mentioned that limitations are
common in these types of resolutions.
Moved,seconded and duly carried to: Approve and adopt the Rules of
Procedure as set forth in District Resolution No. OCSD-01-23, as the Rules of
Procedure of the Planning, Design,and Construction Committee, as amended
to eliminate discussion limitations.
(11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-f)
a. PDCO2-05 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of
the Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36, and the Green
Acres Project between the Orange County Sanitation District and the
Orange County Water District, in a form approved by General Counsel.
Brad Hogin made a presentation on Draft 27 of the agreement, explaining
the recent changes and concerns. If agreement has not been reached
when the agreement is presented to the Board, the item will be pulled
from the agenda.
Moved, seconded,and duly carried to approve the recommended action.
b. PDCO2-06 Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of
Directors to approve Addendum No. 10 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Plant
Reinvention/Automation Project, Job. No. J-42, providing additional
engineering services for reinvention idea benefit/cost evaluation for an
additional amount of$106,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed
$9,468,816.
C. PDCO2-07 Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of
Directors to approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers 16-31
and Related Facilities, Job No. 131-37, providing for additional engineering
services in the amount of$1,602,797 for a total amount not to exceed
$5,205,904.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
February 7, 2002
d. PDCO2-08 Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of
Directors to(1)Approve plans and specifications for Landscape and
Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board
Secretary;and (2)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-84.
e. PDCO2-09 Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of
Directors to approve a sole source purchase order with OCB for
reprographics services for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-66, in the amount of$200,000.
f. PDCO2-10 Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of
Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment of$2,480,000 for a total
budget of$36,186,000 for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No.
1-2-4;and (2)Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer
Rehabilitation,Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering
services for an additional amount of$237,567, increasing the total amount
not to exceed $1,205,475.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY
There were none.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
March 7, 2002 at 5 p.m.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 6
February 7, 2002
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Submitted by:
1160 Tappan
C Committee Secretary
G:M9<leeoe^aawOLla'WNNw�nbA)M OiaR PM M1M A=
PDC COMMITTEE Meebng Date TO BE.01Dr.
oz/07102 oz/nioz
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDCO2-01 14(C)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Dean Fisher, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: FUZZY FILTER PIPE INSTALLATION, JOB NO. SP2000-41
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Accept Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation, Job No. SP2000-41, with Olsson Construction
Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving
the Final Closeout Agreement.
SUMMARY
Background
• Job No. SP2000-41, Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation, includes installing piping and
electrical work to support District provided filtering equipment and pumps.
• MacDonald Stephens Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the
contract was awarded to Olsson Construction on September 7, 2000.
Contract Schedule
Contract Start Date October 16, 2000
Original Contract Completion Date December 14, 2000
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2
Current Contract Completion Date August 13, 2001
Final Completion Date August 13, 2001
Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damages Assessment 0
Job Completion
9 The project is 100% complete and ready for closeout
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 119,646.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 14,798.00
This Change (Add) $ 0.00
Change Orders to Date $ 14,798.00
Percentage Increase to Date 12.37 %
Amended Contract Price $ 134,444.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Facilities Engineering Plant No. 2)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
None
c we.dvacenda� Nende news Q002 a W fend.eeomu=Zlu u(e).sKd l dm
ae.em. anadi 2
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBd.of Dir.
02/07/02 02/27/02
AGENDA REPORT Iem 02-02Numb Item14(d) r
PDCO2-02 14 d
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO FLEET SERVICES, JOB
NO. SP19990022
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job
No. SP19990022, with MVP Commercial, Inc., authorizing an addition of$7,215,
increasing the total contract amount to $93,715; and (2)Accept Tenant Improvements
to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022, as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with MVP
Commercial, Inc.
SUMMARY
Background
• Job No. SP19990022, Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, includes the
installation of a handicapped access ramp and a lunch and locker room inside the
Fleet Services Building at Plant No. 1.
• RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications, and the
contract was awarded to MVP Commercial, Inc. on July 30, 2001.
Contract Schedule
Contract Start Date July 30, 2001
Original Contract Completion Date November 26, 2001
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date November 26, 2001
Actual Completion Date November 20, 2001
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damages Assessment 0
• Change Order No. 1 Content
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Miscellaneous Improvements $ 6,630.00 0 Design Change
2 Additional FramingLumber& Hardware $ 585.00 0 Omission
Total Change Order No. 1 1 $ 7,215.00 0
A
I
• This project is complete and ready for closeout.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Prize $ 86,500.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change Order (CO No. 1, Add) $ 7,215.00
Change Orders to Date $ 7,215.00
Percent Increase to Date 8.34%
Final Contract Prize $ 93,715.00
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (General pool for all Small Projects, FE-J, page 136)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order No. 1
G MAWNgw,Eel Age PepAtOS AberU PgMs Pe WNVN 14(E).SPISS M.O
raawW WOMI Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO FLEET SERVICES
JOB NO. SP19990022
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 368 $ 368 $ 366 $ 368 $ 368 100%
Studies/Permitting $ 1,000 S 7,584 $ 8,584 $ 1,000 $ 7.584 $ 8,584 $ 8,584 100%
Consultant PSA $ 10,000 $ 37,000 $ 4,000 $ 33,000 $ 37,000 $ 4,000 $ 33,000 $ 32,648 99%
Design Staff $ 5.400 $ 10,700 $ 34.300 $ 45,000 $ 10,700 $ 34,300 $ 45,000 $ 43,580 97%
Construction Contract $ 54,000 $ 86,500 $ 7,215 S 93.715 $ 86.500 $ 7215 $ 93,715 $ 86,500 92%
Construction
Administration $ 2.100 $ 4,000 $ 31,000 $ 35,000 $ 4,000 $ 31,000 $ 35000 $ 30,319 87%
Construction
Inspection $ 2.000 $ 4.800 $ 28.000 $ 32.800 $ 4.800 $ 28,000 $ 32,800 $ 30,661 93%
lConfingency I $ 8,700 1 $ 8,700 $ $
PROJECT TOTAL $ 73.500 $ 152.700 $ 95,767 $ 248,467 $ 144,000 $ 104467 $ 248,467 $ 232.660 94%
Reimbursable Costs
PROJECT NET 1 $ 73,500 $ 152,700 $ 95,767 $ 248,467 1 S 144,000 1 $ 104,467 $ 248,467 $ 232,660 1 94%
EDMSI .O.WCIas5Rem01 .IJob 8.d,.V8udga1 lnlor 0a n Table(003 71 7 909)
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services
Job No. SP19990022
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 217102 E 86,500.00 $ 86,500.00 0.00% 120 120
CO NO. 1 Pending $ 7,215.00 $ 93,715.00 8.34% 0 120
H rwp dta�engyobs and conlracls\P1- -2\Cbange OrderMCOI status AS
1
Page 1 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. MVP Commercial, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1
Date: February 7. 2002
Job: Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022
Consultant: RMS Enoineerinn & Design, Inc.
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduct) $7,215.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract andfor contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 — MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS
This item is for the following improvements:
• Improved flooring and cabinets, and installation of handrail for a loft loading pad
• Existing water healer upgrades and installation of drain pipe enclosure
• Miscellaneous improvements for handicapped access
• Improvements to building sign
• Modifications to interior wall footings
• Modification to waterline routing
• Installation of new thermostat
• Electrical Improvements
Some of the improvements and changes originated from District Maintenance and City of Fountain
Valley requests. This hem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 39 (B) 1 of the
General Requirements.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,630.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 —ADDITIONAL FRAMING LUMBER AND HARDWARE
This item is for the installation of additional ceiling joist and framing hardware. Additional ceiling joist
and framing hardware were required but not shown on the drawings. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 39 (B) 1 of the General Requirements.
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 585.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 7,215.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3 e
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. MVP Commercial, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1
Date: February 7. 2002
Job: Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022
Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design. Inc.
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by
this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: July 30, 2001
Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: November 26. 2001
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 26, 2001
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A
Actual Final Completion Date: November 20, 2001
Original Contract Price $86,500.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Pedro $ 7,215.00
Amended Contract Price $ 93,715.00
a
Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: MVP Commercial, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1
Date: February 7. 2002
Job: Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022
Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design. Inc.
Board Authorization Date: February 27, 2002
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
MVP Commercial, Inc.
Contractor Dale
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.Of Dlr.
Dzfmioa 02/27/02
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Ne)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Manager
SUBJECT: JUNCTION STRUCTURE UPGRADE, JOB NO. SP2000-29
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve a budget amendment of$190,000 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job
No. SP2000-29, for a total budget of$472,200; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to
Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc.,
authorizing an addition of$163,552.97 and a time extension of 44 days, increasing the
total contract amount to $352,252.97
SUMMARY
Background
• Job No. SP2000-29, Junction Structure Upgrade includes removing and replacing
two siphon sluice gate assemblies, rehabilitation of PVC lining, and demolition,
upsizing, and replacement of three manhole frames and covers. This project is
adjacent to the east levee of the Santa Ana River across from Plant No. 2, located in
the City of Newport Beach.
• The plans and specifications were prepared in-house and the contract was awarded
to Mike Prich on February 28, 2001.
Contract Schedule
Contract Start Date May 30, 2001
Original Contract Completion Date September 26, 2001
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date November 9, 2001
Anticipated Completion Date February 9, 2002
Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damages Assessment 0
• Change Order No. 1 Content
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Perform odor control measures $ 3,425.20 12 Design Change
at Junction Structures 5 & 6
2 Clean 42-inch siphons of 111,821.03 22 Design Change
Junction Structures 5 & 6
3 Repair break in south 42-inch 48,306.74 10 Changed
siphon, investigate by video the Condition
36-inch force main into
Junction Structures 5 & 6
TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 1 $163,552.97 44
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 188,700.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) $ 163,552.97
Change Orders to Date $ 163,552.97
Percentage Increase to Date 87.00 %
Amended Contract Price $ 352.252.97
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Facilities Engineering Plant No. 2)
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Additional budget is required to provide funds for construction contract change order,
construction staff costs, operations staff costs, and air quality and special projects staff
costs associated with mitigating odors and harsh chemicals, cleaning two 42-inch
siphons and video inspection/investigation of 36-inch DI force main into the Junction
Structure. Refer to attached Budget Information table for breakdown of the proposed
budget amount.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
G 11EUapenda\Board PQenEa R.p M20025aarG Apes.R,,O.A20 'Ot 1(0)SKM29 dx
Revised. MOM' 2
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is categorically exempt. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 2,
2000.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order
G?pLb,epv W 1B®d/nab R ryvb,MR Bpatl RppuY Xe�upDANmn 111a). A Yx
�..ee:vxia 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
JUNCTION STRUCTURE UPGRADE
JOB NO. SP2000-29
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ - $ 2,032
Studies/Permitting E $ - $ 7,200
Consultant PSA $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 1 $ 20,000 1 0%
Des! n Staff $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ 43,887 309%
Construction Contract $ 213.000 S 213.000 $ 190.000 $ 403,000 $ 213,000 $ 163,552 $ 376,552 $ 183.349 49%
Construction
Administration $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 15000 $ 70,699 471%
Construction
Ins action $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 20,000 $ 5,000 $ 15000 $ 20,000 $ 46,231 231%
Contingency $ 25,000 $ 25,000 E 25,000 $
PROJECT TOTAL $ 282,200 $ 282,200 $ 190,000 $ 472,200 $ 257,200 $ 188,552 $ 445.752 $ 353,398 79%
Reimbursable Costs
PROJECT NET $ 282,200 1 $ 282,200 1 $ 190,000 1 $ 472,200 $ 257,200 S 188,552 $ 445.752 $ 353,398 79%
cxv4.u,�nsumcrgarn�000-xsuuesm l,eie cwt
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Junction Structure Upgrade
Job No. SP2000.29
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(CUMULATIVE( (DAYS( (DAYS(
CONTRACT 4/30101 $ 188,700.00 $ 188,700.00 0.00% 120 120
TO
H'\wp.dta\engyobs and contracts\Pl- -2\Change Orders\COt.slalus.als
r -
Page 1 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: February 6. 2002
Job: Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP200029
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduef) $163,552.97
In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —PERFORM ODOR CONTROL AT STRUCTURES 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to work with Division 880,Air Quality and Special Projects, to monitor and
mitigate the odors and sources of harsh chemicals entering the junction structure. This work was not
part of the contract work and was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 48
of the General Requirements of the Specifications. (Reference FCO SP200029-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,425.20
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—CLEAN THE NORTH 42-INCH SIPHON AT STRUCTURS 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to dean both 42-inch siphons. The following effort was put forth to begin
cleaning the north siphon:
• Subcontractor with special Weaning equipment
• Supply confined space entry equipment for support
• Maintaining 3-inch dewatering pumps and fuel on-site equipment
• Set pillow plug and stop-logs, as required, to isolate siphon for cleaning
• Provide support service to assist cleaning effort
Work was accomplished by Contractor's force account work, pursuant to Section 48 of the General
Requirements of the Specifications. (Reference FCO SP200020-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $111.821.03
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 22 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: February 6 2002
Job: Junction Structure Uoorade Job No. SP200029
ITEM 3 —REPAIR BREAK IN SOUTH 42-INCH SIPHON,TV 36-INCH FORCE MAIN
The Contractor made repairs to seal the large hole in the siphon pipe, 10-feet from the structure.
Cleaning could not begin until water infiltration in the siphon was stopped. Two well points were
installed to dewater the point of repair. In addition, the Contractor TV'd the south 36-inch force main to
investigate the condition of the pipe. Work was accomplished by Contractor's force account work
pursuant to Section 48 of the General Requirements of the Specifications. (Reference FCO
SP200029-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $48, 306.74
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $163,552.97
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 44 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mike Pdich and Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: February 6. 2002
Job: Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP200029
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 44 calendar day
extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect,
incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: May 30, 2001
Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: September 26, 2001
Time Extension this C.O.: 44 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 44 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 164 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 9, 2001
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 188,700.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 163,552.97
Amended Contract Price $ 352,252.97
i�
Page 4 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: February 6, 2002
Job: Junction Structure Uocrade. Job No. SP200029
Board Authorization Date: February 27, 2002
ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT
Submitted by
Construction Manager Date
Approved by.
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
MIKE PRLICH AND SONS
Contractor Date
i!
/
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TeBd.ofoo-.
zn/Dz 2 27o
AGENDA REPORT I Number Item Number PD
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-42
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 10, to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering
Science, Inc., for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing additional
engineering services for reinvention idea benefit/cost evaluation for an additional amount of
$106,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,468,816.
SUMMARY
Background:
• Job No. J-42, the Plant Automation and Reinvention Project,was created to capture and
implement good ideas for reinventing and automating our treatment plants. Reinvention is
expected to solve several operations, maintenance, and regulatory compliance problems as
well as reduce costs and increase reliability.
• The Plant Automation/Reinvention Project is divided into four phases: Phase 1 collected the
reinvention ideas; this phase is complete. Phase 2 evaluates the reinvention ideas and
selects the ideas with an acceptable payback for implementation.
• This proposed Addendum No. 10 to Job No. J-42 will complete Phase 2 of the project.
Phase 3 and 4 are the design phase and construction phase; these phases will start when
all good reinvention ideas are identified.
• The project was planned and budgeted with several addenda because of the uncertainty of
the quantity and nature of reinvention ideas that would come forth from the reinvention
workshops; and to allow the Board close and periodic oversight of progress over the long
term of the project.
• Job No. J-42 must select only the cost-effective plant improvement ideas generated during
reinvention workshops for implementation or construction. Of the 512 ideas generated in
the CenGen/Utilities reinvention workshop, 471 have been resolved by other means. The
41 remaining CenGen/Utilities process area reinvention ideas need to be evaluated at this
time using the BenefiUCost evaluation procedure. These 41 reinvention ideas fall in three
general categories:
• Sixteen ideas involve installing either tighter controls or automated controls to allow
reduced chemical and solid disposal costs
-1-
1
• Fifteen ideas are for changes to mechanical systems to reduce or eliminate maintenance
problems
• Ten ideas are way to increase treatment reliability.
Proposed Addendum No. 10
• Evaluates 41 reinvention ideas and selects the ideas meeting the Orange County Sanitation
District minimum benefiittcost requirements for construction. The good ideas will be built; the
ideas with inadequate payback will be rejected. Evaluation and development cost is
$106,218.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Authorization of an additional $106,218 for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement
budget is being requested, increasing the total authorization to $9,468,816.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CAA)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item) -
An increase in the Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA) budget from $9,362,598
to$9,468,816 is being requested by transferring $106,218 from the Contingency budget. No
increase in the overall project budget is necessary. See the attached Budget Information Table
for further information.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Project Overview
The Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, was created to: (1) Develop
documentation for the existing automation and controls systems; (2) Provide a workshop format
for the reinvention of plant operation and automation; and (3) Develop and implement plant
automation to an optimum level. Through this project, the operation and maintenance of the
Orange County Sanitation District's two treatment plants will be reinvented to:
• Provide Operations with data that is currently not available, which will allow optimal process
control and operation.
• Provide Maintenance with information to better manage and maintain plant equipment and
controls.
• Reduce operating costs through more efficient chemical usage and reduced staffing levels
by application of automation and centralized monitoring and control.
• Provide for a more efficient and cost-effective design process due to the development of
accurate and up-to-date information about existing plant conditions.
• Bring the Orange County Sanitation District(District) in compliance with OSHA regulatory
requirements for lockout, tag-out documentation requirements.
-2-
The Plant Automation/Reinvention Project is divided into four phases:
• Phase 1 gathers reinvention/automation ideas. The plant control system is documented and
reinvention ideas are compiled in this phase. Phase 1 is complete; over 2,000 ideas for
improvements have been generated and categorized in Phase 1.
• Phase 2 evaluates the ideas and selects the ideas that provide an acceptable benefit for the
cost. The Benefit/Cost Process was defined earlier by Addendum No. 6; Proposed
Addendum No. 10 funds the Benefit/Cost Process for ideas related to the CenGen/Utilities
process areas. This addendum will complete Phase 2.
NxRux♦ capr•R,q'YA emM Rry•n
J42 Phase 1 cY.,n,mm cwYFmm arosMna..
Mni NbM1Yv+p
WaM1YwW Ne., OpnWYm N3 M,.tl WIW Pm�q SmtlRalN-
aRT aW^ Cwy^
t1pM
R.Nwnkw
O{WNAW
J42 Phase 2
s.m
wm u�Y.. noRx
NxM6 Jix Eru.plvw Rq
LMX aNGp BFYNCOYRNa
0.YT emYl Da'.IR RYPnY..
^ aLLhF., R9w R RKonmFNnn.B
VMYMW> SOW.
RW4.&C
Bytlry FaeYy
ulm. Tq.a.
arM,O RV41q.6 FF.hsW tinG.d
oM�
GupWaen
GurvNCw
J-42 Automation/Reinvention Project
• Phase 3 and 4 include the detailed design and construction of ideas that yield a payback of
5 to 7 years.
Phase 1 Documentation and Reinvention Workshops: The control systems are field-
checked and documented in drawings called Process & Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs),
Instrumentation Loop Diagrams (ILDs), Control Logic Diagrams (CLDs), and Instrumentation
and Equipment Data Sheets. Next, the District teams responsible for an area are brought
together with outside experts in a series of workshops to generate as many improvement ideas
for the area as possible. The workshop approach has been far more successful in creating
ideas than was anticipated —over 2,000 reinvention ideas came out of Phase 1. Phase 1 is
complete.
Idea Categorization Process: All workshop ideas are then submitted to the District
Categorization Committee for categorization. The Categorization Committee groups ideas in
one of ten categories: (1) General ideas affecting a department policy or procedure are sent to
the appropriate department for action; (2) Ideas involving health or safety matters are sent to the
Safety Department; (3) and (4) Some ideas are not practical to implement on existing facilities
but are valid for future projects; these are embedded in the District Design Guidelines or the
-3-
District Master Specifications; (5) Ideas that are unclear, unlikely to have a 7-year payback,or
are comments are categorized "NO-GO"and are returned to the originating group; (6) Ideas
that affect an area with a planned project or; (7) Ideas that affect an area with an existing
construction project are dropped into those projects to be evaluated as part of the project design
process; Low-cost ideas that clearly meet the 7-year payback criteria are sent to the District
Small Projects group for immediate implementation or(8)through the work order system for
implementation by the District maintenance crews; and (9) Ideas where the payback is uncertain
or(10) Ideas that need further study to clarify them are processed by the J-42 Benefit/Cost
Process.
Phase 2 Benefit/Cost Process: The benefittoost process enables the District to define and
select the most cost-effective ideas that have a payback of 5 to 7 years or less. Ideas with an
acceptable payback are developed by this process into Preliminary Engineering Assessment
Reports (PEARS). The PEARS are roughly equivalent to the Preliminary Design Reports (PDR)
required of all design projects and support the Phase 3 Design and Phase 4 Construction of the
J-42 project. This Addendum No. 10 provides funding to Benefit/Cost the 41 CenGen/Utilities
reinvention ideas for both Plant Nos.1 and 2. The negotiated cost for the Benefit/Cost
evaluation of the 41 CenGen/Utilities reinvention ideas is $106,218. An additional two months
will be added to the schedule to accomplish the additional work.
Design and Construction: The Preliminary Engineering Assessment Reports (PEAR)provide
enough detail for the District consultants to proceed with detailed design, and then construction,
via the normal District design and construction mechanisms. The PEAR replaces the
engineering design effort that normally culminates in the Preliminary Design Reports(PDR).
This reduces the overall design cost by approximately 10% by eliminating the preliminary
engineering effort required to generate the PDR. Funding for the design and construction is
available in the J-42 budget.
ALTERNATIVES
No other alternatives have been identified as this project represents the recommendations of
the DART process.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is included in the Strategic Plan EIR, certified by the Orange County Sanitation
District's Board on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on
October 29, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. PSA Status Report
JKT:nc:jo
G:tntg1obaMgenda Deft Reporis\PDCV 42-122601 Addendum 10 Agenda ReporLi xoc
-4-
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Addendum No. 10
Job No. J-42
xj
Yf si + I ', RIGINAL CURRENT`., PROPOSED s PROPOSED(t I t ' FUNDS .PROPO.$ED EBTI ATED ESTiMAfEtl
PROJECTITASPCiS; B(UITHORIZED' PROJECT BUDGET 'RENSED trw tgI1T-HORQED AUTfIO-N,` ^ (OII; TOTAIi. E7ZPE, (TURF F7(FEN{SSS'
` BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET ` ",TO DATE :YtEhUEBT AUTHORIZATION 1 TO DATE To bATEIS:).
Project Development $ 185,180 $ 258.000 $ 258,000 $ 258,DD0 $ 258.000 $ 229,715 89%
Studies/PeimiBln $ 2,DD0,0D0 $ 2.219.276 S 2.219.276 $ 2.219.276 $ 2.219.276 $ 1,959,887 88%
Consultant PSA $ 4,383.400 $ 9.362.598 $106218 $ 9,468.816 $ 9,362.598 S10621I8 $ 9,468816 $ 8,042,235 85%
Design Staff $ 2.961,531 S 1,145,000 $ 1,145,000 $ 0%
Construction Connect $ 8,696.472 $ 9,844 000 $ 9,844,000 $ 0%
Construction
Administration $ 600,000 $ 785,000 $ 785,000 $ 0%
Construflbn
Inspection $ 2,030.000 $ 597.000 1 $ 597,0D0 $ D%
Contingency $ 4,903417 $ 1,649,126 $ 106,218 $ 1,442,908 $ 0%
PROJECTTOTAL $ 25,760,000 $ 25,760,000 $ - $ 25.760,000 .' $ 11,839,874 $ 106,218 $ 11,946,092 $ 10.231.837 86%
Reimbumble Costs
PROJECT NET 1 $ 25.760,000 $ 25,760,000 $ - $ 25,760,0D0 $ 11,839,874 $ 106,218 $ 11,946,092 1 $ 10,231,837 86%
h.V yd %SrQV Vxw pt,sG
Form ILNse f Oot 4.2000
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT
JOB NO. J-42
Total Project Budget: $25.760,000
Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
Start Date of Project: May 27, 1998
Date Addendum Description cost Accumulated
costs
5/27/98 Original PSA J-42 is the Plant Reinvention and Automation Project $4,383,400 $4,383,400
that will increase plant automation to an optimum level.
It is a capital project that will implement physical
changes to the plant process control systems and
equipment to support both Operations and Maintenance
4/1/99 1• Provide facilitator for Area 10/20 Workshop 1 $16,500 $4,399.900
7M/99 2 Additional Miscellaneous Services $80,537 $4.480,437
7121/99 3 Plant Tagging Services $616,393 $5,096,830
10/26/99 4' Correction to Agreement Language $0 $5,096,830
4/26/00 5 Virtual Tags $420,0D0 $5,516,830
7/19100 6 Phase 2 Vision and Goals $82,763 $5,599,593
8/23/00 7 Drawing Count Adjustment $1,896,186 $7.495,779
4/25/01 8 Liquid Stream Benefit/Cost Analysis $240,945 $7,736,724
9/26/01 9 Digester Benefit/Cost Analysis and Miscellaneous $1,625.874 $9,362,598
Pending 10 CenGen/Utilifies Benefit/Cost Analysis $106,2181 $9,468,816
• GM Approval
6:M9Me1a0enW,BwrOgpmli FWu,..BmM A,.Pq WNZSW.
Page 5
PDC COMMITTEE Meenaaoale TOBd.o Dir.
oz/o7/oz oz/z7/oz
f AGENDA REPORT I%Number Ea nn ZN b-
VDCD2-07 39(g)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator. Chuck Hodge, Engineer
SUBJECT: DESIGN OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB.
NO. P1-37,ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and
Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37.
providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$1,602,797 for a total
amount not to exceed $5,205,904.
SUMMARY
• Five addenda have been issued over the past three years that have increased the
scope of design effort required for this project. Since the completion of the Final
Project Report in January 1999, the project has become much more complex due to
added modifications to the existing primary clarifiers at Plant No. 1, and due to a
complete overhaul of the existing process control and instrumentation to meet the
District's latest design standards.
• Staff has determined that additional consultant construction support services will be
required during the construction and close-out periods in order to accommodate the
increased project scope.
• This Addendum includes the following construction support services: attending
weekly progress meetings, assisting Staff in responding to requests for
information/clarification from the contractor, preparation of change orders,
equipment tagging, reviewing contractor submittals, and preparing record drawings,
as described in the attached proposal letter from Brown and Caldwell.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total project Budget for Design of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,
Job No. P1-37, is $84,529,600. Authorization of an additional $1,602,797 is being
requested for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement increasing the total
authorization to $5,205,904, which is approximately 7% of the Construction cost.
Page 1
r
BUDGETIMPACT 7
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:section a—Page 68)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Transfer of funds is being requested from contingency to other project tasks as follows:
$6,000 for Project Development, $3,000 for Studies/Permitting, $1,299,904 for
Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA), and $500,000 for Design staff.
The overall Budget is not being increased. Please see the attached Budget Information
Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
The Orange County Sanitation District's (District)Strategic Plan requires additional
primary treatment capacity to be in place at Plant No. 1, by 2003. In September 1998, a
PSA was issued to Brown and Caldwell for design and construction support services for
Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37,for$1,993,000.
In September 1998, the District issued a PSA to Brown and Caldwell for preliminary
design studies, final design, and services during construction for Primary Clarifiers
16-31. This project includes the design of 96-mgd of primary treatment facilities, and
improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15.
In January 1999, Brown and Caldwell submitted the Final Project Report, which
included results of preliminary design studies which were conducted in an effort to
optimize the operation and maintenance of ail primary clarifiers and related facilities at
Plant No. 1.
Addendum No. 1, which was approved In April 1999, increased the contract amount
$863,185, for a total PSA amount of$2,856,185. When the original PSA was approved,
the Scope of Work included studies for optimizing the Plant No. 1 primary treatment
process. Options that were found to be cost-effective in the studies were added to the
design Scope of Work through Addendum No. 1.
Addendum No. 2, which was approved in November 1999, increased the contract
amount$21, 557, for a total PSA amount of$ 2,877,742. This additional work involved
an investigation of high rate clarifiers located throughout Canada and Europe.
Addendum No. 3, which was approved in December 1999, increased the contract
amount $189,537, for a total PSA amount of$3,067,279. As a result of the re-invention
efforts and foul air odor control studies conducted, Staff identified the additional design
work that needed to be added to this job.
ate:MOM Page 2
Addendum No. 4, which was approved in August 2000, increased the contract amount
$511,045,for a total Professional Services Agreement(PSA) amount of$3,578,324.
This additional work included design services necessary to add another control building,
retrofit controls, add effluent monitoring equipment, install a pilot coagulation plant,
provide CMMS work, and miscellaneous re-work.
Addendum No. 5, which was approved in May 2001, increased the contract amount
$24,783 for a total PSA amount of $3,603,107. This additional work included
engineering services necessary to bring the final design submittal up to current
standards and to provide design changes recommended by Orange County Sanitation
District staff.
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 6,which provides for additional
construction support services, increasing the contract amount $1,602,797 for a total
amount not to exceed $5,205,904.
ALTERNATIVES
No aftematives are proposed.
CEOA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27,
1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
3. Proposal Letter from Brown and Caldwell dated November 5, 2001.
CJH:jo:nc:sa
G.1 p.dWXagendaXPDC%2002Ugenda Repods102-07-P7-37-020702.dm
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities
Job No. P1-37
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASH AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION :TOTAL EXPENDITURE ::EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TD DATE To DATE(Ys)
Project Development $ 74,000 $ 61000 $ 80.000 $ 74.000 $ 6.000 $ 80,000 $ 79,509 99%
Studies/Permitting $ 307,000 $ 3,000 $ 310.000 $ 307,000 $ 3,000 $ 310,000 $ 309,428 100%
Consultant PSA $ 3.906.000 $ 1.299,904 1 5,205,904 $ 3,603.107 $ 1,602,797 $ 5.205.904 $ 3.337.798 64%
Design Staff $ 514,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,014,D00 $ 514.000 $ 500.000 $ 1,014,000 $ 947,842 931/6
Construction Contract $ 70,366,000 $ 70,366,000 : . $ 70.366.000 $ 70,366,000 0%
Construction
Administration $ 1,230,000 $ 1.230,000 $ 1,230,000 $ 1.230,000 $ 118.443 10%
Construction
Inspection $ 1,096,000 $ 1,096.000 $ 1,096.000 $ 1.096,000 $ 25.497 2%
Contingency $ 7,036,600 $ (1,808,904) $ 5.227,696 Fs
PROJECTTOTAL $ - $ 84,529,600 $ - $ 84,529,600 -?a}-I $ 77,190,107 $ 2,111,797 $ 79.301,904 1 $ 4,818,517 8%
rFs
is
R 'mbursable Costs -
PROJECT NET $ - $ 84.529.600 $ - $ 84,529,600 �,:,. $ 77,190.107 $ 2.111,797 $ 79.301,904 1 $ 4.818.517 6%
CaFl1eN.WPgP1-37 Budgd Table Md pe 84C.dslDistdds
b'twF dt Ntbmslbutlget bble
Form Revised Cd.4,WW
4 �
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. P1-37
Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities
Total Project Budget: $84,529,600
Consultant: Broom and Caldwell
Start Date of Project: September 1998
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
9/23/98 ,Original PSA Provide engineering services for 96-MGD Primary Clarifiers $1,993,000 $1,993,000
and Related Facilities
Provide engineering services for: (1)rehabilitation of existing
412MO 1 primary clarifiers; (2)centralized sludge collection and $863,185 $2,856,185
transfer facilities(3)modification to influent distribution
structure;and 4 installation of trickling filter feed line
Provide engineering services needed to conduct an
11/15/99 2 evaluation of high rate clarifiers as recommended by the $21,557 $2,877,742
Value Engineer
Provide engineering design services necessary to Improve
12115199 3 odor control and automate the P1-33 clarifiers. Provide $189,537 $3,067,279
construction support services Involved with additional work
added In Addenda Nos. 1-3
Provide engineering design services necessary to add
823/00 4 another control building,retrofit controls,and effluent $511,045 $3,578,324
monitoring, Install a pilot coagulation plant,provide CMMS
work and miscellaneous re-work.
Provide engineering design services necessary to bring the
5/11101 5 final design submittal up to current standards and to provide $24.783 $3.603.107
design changes recommended by District staff.
Provide additional construction support services to assist
District staff during the construction phase of the project.
Pending 6 Work includes added requirements to satisfy the new $1,602,797 $5.205.904
engineering standard requirements and the increased scope
of the project.
C T.Il NMWl%P1J7 PSA SNWs R.,e H&C Md W Coo
12/20/01
Revised 05/14/90
a 167a6 Pon Kerman.6une 200
bvme.CA 92606
TO:(949)660-10M
Fax (949)04-0 40
November 5,2001
Mr.David A.Ludwin,P.E.
Director of Engineering
Orange County Sanitation District
t 10844 Ellis Avenue
1 Fountain Valley,California 92708-7018 12/91017-003.1
Subject: Addendum No. 6
Construction Support Services
Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Faahoes
Job NumberPI-37
Deaz Mt.Ludwig:
As requested,we have revisited our original scope and fee for providing the construction
support services for the construction of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and related facilities.
We are requesting a revision to our contract to include additional scope items in Job No.
P1-37. Included in this letter is the origin of the items,reason for change,and additional
engineering costs and manhour breakdown(see Attachment A).
Since the completion of the Preliminary Design Report in January 1999,the scope of the
project has grown significantly.The project has become much more complex due to the
construction of modifications to the existing 15 primary clarifiers and due to a complete
overhaul of the existing process Control and instrumentation to meet the District's latest
design standards.This increased scope and Complexity will have a significant effect on
our Construction support effort because:
• The contract drawings have increased fort 257 to 963;
• The construction period has extended from 27 to 46 months;and
• The construction costs has crept from$58 to$72 million.
The following items describe additions to our scope and additional engineering Costs for
providing the construction support services.
1. Artendanae ofareeklypmgmss meetings.
Attend progress meeting once per week for the entire construction schedule
according to the District's October 3,2001 letter (the Letter).Based on a
construction time of 46 months,there will be 200 weekly meetings.We assume that
the weekly progress meetings will be attended by two people,a project manager and
a project engineer.The original scope did not include weekly progress meetings.The
cost for the additional 200 meetings will be as follows:
12i1F91a171K3/Ie209Lv
0
Mr. David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 5,2001
Page 2
Labor and Overhead $241,600
Direct Costs $800
Profit $15,704
TOTAL 3218,104
2. Attend miscellaneous meetings to discuss and resolve issues during ronsfruction.
The original scope assumed 50 meetings to be attended by two people,a project
manager and a speaalist for a construction period of 27 months. For the revised
estimate,we have assumed that 35 additional meetings will be required to covet the
revised longer construction duration of 46 months.The cost for engineering services
for the additional 35 meetings will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $42,280
Direct Costs $170
Profit $2,748
TOTAL $4f,198
3. Preparation of responses to mquestfor information(RF7s)and reguestsfor
da,#4-ion(RFCs).
The original scope of work with all addenda assumed 190 hours for responding to
RFIs and RFCs.This estimate of engineering effort is extremely low considering that
there are 963 contract drawings,three volumes of speafications,and 3 years and 10
months of construction time.Based on out past experience,it takes about eight
hours of professional time and two hours of clerical time per week to respond to
RFIs and RFCs.The additional cost for engineering services for responding to RFIs
and RFCs will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $176,250
Direct Costs $1,500
Profit $11,456
TOTAL $189,206
4. Plan change preparation and prepare formal revisions to rontrad docununtsfor
change order.
Out original scope assumed the value of change orders to be one percent of the
construction contract excluding consultant's eaors and omissions.This number is
much lower than the industry nomr of five percent, especially for projects
constructing modifications to existing facilities.The value of change orders for
OCSD's Projects P1-21,PI-31 and Pl-33 was greater than five percent of
construction cost excluding eaors and omissions. For this project with above-
avenge complexity,we suggest the use of change orders at five percent of
,aanuntan/al Mr
Mr.David A.Ludwin,P.E.
4 November 5,2001
Page 3
construction cost for estimating the engineering effort The cost of engineering
services for developing change orders for an additional four percent of the
construction contract will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $260,000
Direct Costs $11,000
Profit $17,000
TOTAL $288,000
.r. Prepam data sheetsfor all equipment shown"the P&IDs.
Our original scope was amended to include design modifications to the exiting
processes for Primary Clarifiers 1 through 15.There are 43 P&IDs for the design of
these modifications.The cost for the construction support services for preparing
data sheets for all equipment shown on the addition2143 P&IDs is as follows:
Labor and Overhead $94,944
Direct Costs $1,000
Profit $6,171
TOTAL $IO2,I11
6. Assirtar mstartup, initial operation, and shutdown Qfthefacilities.
The original scope of work assumed startup and initial operation of the new clarifiers
at the end of the construction period Now,because of the construction of
modifications to the existing 15 primary clarifiers,the startup and initial operation
will be done in four phases in order to keep the plant m operation:
a. Startup of new clarifiers;
b. Startup of eastside existing clarifiers;
c. Startup of westside existing clarifiers;and
d. Startup of existing Primary Clarifiers 1 through 5.
We have assumed that this sequential construction will require at least three
additional startup,initial operation and shutdown operations.The cost for the
engineering services for conducting additional startup services will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $45,000
Direct Costs $4,000
Profit $2,950
TOTAL s11,9f0
1]��I 9101LIef/0 WMJm
Mr. David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 5,2001
Page 4 V
7. Project management astioities daring annst a"don.
The construction duration,based on the original scope of work (see Predesign
Report, 1999),was 2 years and 3 months.The construction time has increased to
3 years and 10 months due to additions to our scope of work and modifications to
the existing processes and electrieal/instrumentation systems. Based on the revised
construction schedule, there will be additional project management activities for one
year and seven months.The cost for the additional project management activities
will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $128,904
Direct Costs $1,500
Profit $8,378
TOTAL $138,792
S. Preparation ofnaeord drawings,mrarel loop dmmings and facility P&ID drawings.
Out original scope of work for the preparation of the record drawings has been
increased significantly duting design development due to 1) the increased project
scope and 2) the additional requirements for preparation of record drawings
identified in Rev.D of the Engineeting Design Guidelines.The number of contract
drawings has increased foffi 257 to 963 and the latest guidelines bas identified the
following additional requirements:
a. Convert the as-built P&IDs,Instrument Loop Diagrams,and piping demolition
drawings into baseline drawings suitable for merging into the OCSD
consolidated baseline drawing set
b. Create facility P&IDs from the typical P&IDs. Create utilities P&IDs and
convert into baseline drawings suitable for merging into the OCSD consolidated
baseline drawing set
c. Consultant shall verify that the contractor-generated drawings,approved shop
drawings,approved field change orders,plan clarifications,plan changes and
other deviations from the original work are correctly reflected in the marked-up
set prepared for the Record Drawings and that the information in the set is
complete.
d. Consultant shall stamp as-built drawings generated by the Contractor.The
Consultant shall be responsible for converting the contractor-generated drawings
to the OCSD-required electronic formats. The Consultant shall also identify
errors and omissions and shall incorporate their corrections into the respective
drawings and construction drawings.
e. The Consultant shall include in the proposed price an allowance for the Record
Drawing task that assumes the number of contractor-generated drawings to be
equal to the number of the final design drawings.
I2.111MOVA3/I@OL.
Mr. David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 5,2001
Page 5
Based on our original scope,we had estimated an engineering effort of 430 hour for
this task.The cost of the additional engineering services to prepare the Record
Drawings for the increased project scope in accordance with Rev. D of the
Engineering Design Guidelines will be as follows:
Labor and
Overhead Direct Costs Profit
8.1 Project Record Drawings $69,600 $4,000 $4,524
8.2 convert P&IDs, ILDs,
and demolition drawings See Note 1
into baseline drawings
8.3 Create facility P&IDs
from typical P&IDs
and utilities P&IDs See Note I
and convert to
baseline drawings
8.4 Verification of marked up
drawings $87,000 $5,000 $5,660
8.5 As-built drawings
generated by the
contractor $94.744 $5.000 SUM
$251,344 $14,000 $16,384
TOTAL $281,728
Note i s OCSD decided to process items 8.2 and 8.3 separately at a later date.
9. Assittance and preparation of additional equipment identification Aaggixg as
needed to comply with District standards.
Provide tag numbers for all manual valves,motors and drives in accordance with the
latest District standards. Revise the contract P&IDs to show new tag numbers.The
additional cost for the engineering services for preparation of the identification
tagging will be as follows:
Labor and Overhead $18,060
Direct Costs $900
Profit $1,174
TOTAL $20,134
13.01 911a 7103/IIIr139.a
Mr. David A.Ludwin,P.E.
November 5, 2001
Page 6 ti
10. Shop drawing rubmintal review.
Our original design scope was revised (Addendum 4) to delete all PLC programming
and SCADA HMI configuration work Currently,all PLC programming and testing
will be performed by the Contractor.This item covers the review and approval of all
Contractor submittals related to PLC programming and testing programs.The cost
for construction support services for this item is:
Labor and Overhead $20,624
Direct Costs $500
Profit $1,340
TOTAL $22,464
11. Collect aU data needed to update the electrical transient andyterpra8�
Our original scope was amended to include process modifications to Hosting
Primary Clarifiers I through 5 and Primary Clarifies 6 through 15.This item
includes collecting all appropriate data for the modification work and assisting the
District in updating the database and determining the proper device settings.The
cost for the engineering services for this item is:
Labor and Overhead $6,250
Direct Costs $250
Profit $406
TOTAL $6,906
l2. Create and update a CVAff Database to store data per District Standards.
On August 23,2000 our contract was amended to create a CMMS Database for
4,000 equipment items.The current estimate for the equipment including all valves is
6,500 equipment items.The cost for the engineering services for creating the CMMS
Data for the additional 2,500 items is:
Labor and Overhead $114,750
Direct Coss $1,000
Profit $7,460
TOTAL $123,210
can.mmvv>/a¢ony.
Mr. David A.Ludwig P.E.
November 5, 2001
Page 7
13. Ftouideon-nkgeotechm4dsesolces(submnsulmntmst).
District requested to include services of Converse Consultants,geotechnical
subconsultants to Brown and Caldwell for the Project P1-37,to provide geotechnical
services during the construction of Pl-37 project Subconsultant fees and cost for
this item will be$75,000.
The summary of additional scope items is as follows:
Task Labor& Direct
No. Task Description Overhead Costs Profit Total
1 Weekly Progress Meetings 241,600 800 15,704 258,104
2 Miscellaneous Meetings 42AO 170 2,748 45,198
3 RFls&RFCs 176,250 1,500 11,456 189,206
4 Change Orden 260,000 11,000 17,000 288,000
5 Data Sheen 94,944 1,000 6,171 102,115
6 Startup,Initial Operation 45,000 4,000 2,950 51,950
7 Project Management 128,904 1,500 9,378 138,782
8 Record Drawings 251,344 14,000 16,384 281,728
9 Equipment Tagging 18,060 900 1,174 20,134
10 Shop Drawings Review 20,624 500 1 w 22,464
11 Electoral Transient Analyzer 6,250 250 406 6,906
Program
12 CMMS Dambase 114,750 1,000 7,460 123,210
Sabto 1.400,006 1 36,620 91,171 1,527,797
13 Subconsultant Costs 75,000
TOTAL 1,602,797
The total allowable compensation under this addendum will be:
Existing Change per
Agreement as Addendum Amended
Amended No.6 Agreement
Engineering Services(burdened labor plus $3,097,745 1,400,006 4,497,751
overhead Q 1101/6),Not to Exceed
Subconsultant Fees and Costs, 93,600 75,000 158,600
Not to Exceed
Profit 208,065 91,171 299,236
Direct Costs,Not to Exceed 213,697 36,620 250,317
Toil Not to Exceed $1,603,107 1,602,797 1,20,904
iuLsmnm)/anV)Ac
Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. `
November 5,2001
Page 8 f
Please note that our total engineering costs for design,construction support,O&M
assistance and creating CMMS database including this Addendum will be$5,705,904.
This is only 7.23 percent of the total construction cost of the Project(construction cost
$72 million). For the project of above-average complexity and for providing unique
engineering services during design and construction stages,this percentage is
significantly lower than the recent District's projects of comparable size and complexity.
We would be pleased to discuss this estimate with you at your convenience.Please call
me if you have any questions.
Very truly your
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Robert M. Finn,P.E.
Vice President
AM:RFae
ATTACHMENT V
COST AND MANHODR BREAKDOWN
Labor,his Cost $
IYbor&
Item Description Professional Technical Clerical Overhead Direct Cost Profit
1 Attend Weekly Meetings.Assume 200 1,600 — 200 241,600 800 15,704
meetings,two persons,4 hours each and
I hour/meeting for clerical support.
2 Meetings to Resolve Construction Issues. 280 -- 35 42,280 170 2,748
Assume 35 additional rnectings,two persons,
4 hours each and 1 hour/meeting for clerical
support.
3 Responses to RFIs and RFCs.Assumes 9 1610 -- 500 176,250 1,500 11,456
hours professional and 2.5 hours of clerical per
week,less 190 hours in original scope.
4 Change Order Preparation.Assume 40/9 1050 1,500 320 260,000 11,000 17,000
additional change order.Assume 10%design
fee for$2.88 M change order(tasks for
planning,preparing design and revising
drawings for change orders).
5 Data Sheets for Equipment Shown on P&IDs. 860 258 94,944 1,000 6,171
There are 43 additional drawings.Assume 20
professional and 6 clerical hours in preparing
data sheets for all equipment shown on one
MID.
6 Assistance in Start-up,Initial Operation and 360 120 -- 45,000 4,000 2,950
Shutdown of the Facilities. Assume 120
process/mechanical and 240 electrical/
instrumentation and 120 technical hours.
7 Project Management Activities During the 820 — 410 128,904 1,500 8,378
Extended Period. Assume 10 hours for project
manager and 5 hours clerical per week for one
year and seven months.
1"1.91017.00J/XVNA Mt A(ml)
Labor,Ism Cost $
Labor&
Item Description Professional Technical Clerical Overhead Direct Cost Profit
8 Preparation of Record Drawings,Baseline
Drawings and Facility P&IDs
8.1 As-built contract drawings (616 additional 132 716 69,600 4,000 4,524
drawings)
8.2 Convert the P&IDs,ILDs,and piping
demolition drawings into baseline
drawings (120 P&IDs,1,200 ILDs,24
piping drawings)
8.3 Create facility P&IDs from typical
contract P&IDs and utilities P&IDs and
convert into baseline drawings (20
drawings)
8.4 Verifications of the marked-up drawings 900 100 87,000 5,000 5,660
(963 contract and 963 contractor
generated drawings)
8.5 Prepare as-built drawings generated by 80 963 94,744 51000 6,200
Contractor
TAdditional Equipment Tang.Assume 0.5 GO 120 20 18,060 900 1,174
ional hour and 1.0 technical hour per
and 20 hours for clerical support,
10 Additional Shop Drawings Submittal Review. 200 -- -- 20,624 500 1,340
11 Collect All Data for the Electrical Transient 50 15 — 6,250 250 406
Analyzer Program.
12 Create CMMS Database for additional 2,500 1,200 200 — 114,750 1,000 7,460
equipment items
Excludes costs for items 9.2 and 8.3
t[ut.stun.am/1024D ee.mmmt A(top
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Da e T%ld.of Dir.
02(7/02 2/27/02
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDCO2-08 14(h)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. 132-84
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (2) Authorize the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,
Job No. 132-84.
SUMMARY
• This project is required to comply with the City of Huntington Beach, Plant No. 2,
Coastal Development permit and the Urban Design Element of the 1999 Strategic Plan.
• The purpose of this project is to shield views of Plant No. 2 from Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH) as effectively as possible given restrictions imposed by the California Department
of Fish and Game (DF&G).
• Workshops were held with the stakeholders to develop a landscaping plan that would be
acceptable to the local community and the regulatory agencies.
• Since the approved landscape plan is more extensive than originally envisioned, the
estimated construction cost is higher by$60,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See the attached Budget Information Table. At this time, authorization for expenditure of
$460,000 for construction of the proposed project is being recommended.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8— Page 145)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The attached Budget Information Table indicates a transfer of$60,000 from the
Contingency line to the Construction Contract line to cover the Engineers estimate. The
Budget Information Table also shows a reduction in authorization of funds for Project
Development and Studies/Permitting and an increase in authorization of funds for Design
staff to match the FY 2001-2002 CIP budget estimate. The overall budget total remains
unchanged.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In 1996, the Orange County Sanitation District was issued a Coastal Development Permit ,
for the replacement of Surge Tower No. 1 and the City Water Pump Station located at Plant
No. 2. The permit required that the Orange County Sanitation District (District) prepare a
plan that provides for additional landscaping along the PCH side of the facility. The plan
was required to provide for landscaping improvements that shield views of Plant No. 2 from
PCH as effectively as possible, given restrictions imposed by the Department of Fish and
Game (DF&G) and constraints resulting from the plant infrastructure, both above and below
ground. The plan was required to be completed at the conclusion of the Strategic Plan or
June of 1998, which ever occurred sooner. Implementation of the plan was to commence
immediately thereafter.
In accordance with this requirement, plans were completed by the District in April 1998.
However, consensus was not reached with the City of Huntington Beach and the DF&G
regarding the use of native vegetation. Job No. P2-84 was subsequently approved to
develop a landscape plan that would meet all stakeholder concerns. The completed plans
and specifications for this project now reflect consensus among the stakeholders gained
through a series of meetings. In addition, the proposed landscape plan was presented at a
City of Huntington Beach Council Meeting.
Design features include:
• Two undulating mounds approximately 11 feet high utilizing a manufactured soil
retention system along the ocean facing boundary of Plant No. 2 between Brookhurst
Avenue and the dissolved air flotation thickeners.
• Native vegetation on top and sides of the mounds and at the base of the mounds
between the Plant No. 2 boundary and the bike path.
• A series of fluted concrete panels to add aesthetic appeal and provide further screening
to the public.
• Green vinyl clad fencing between the dissolved air flotation thickeners and the
secondary clarifiers. Vines will grow on the fencing to provide additional screening.
This design maximizes the screening height within the available area and eliminates the
potential for raptors to threaten endangered species that inhabit the adjacent Talbert Marsh.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the construction budget. Not approving the budget would mean that the
District would not be able to meet the visual screening required by the Coastal Permit.
CEQA FINDINGS
Addendum No. 2 to the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, was
received and filed by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
PK:jo:sa
G W.9 NIpen0eVbv0 AW..e.. W2B-0Arnf hBo,ISNNM.m IiP)M2 d.
R.W. NMI Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2
JOB NO. P2-84
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS p0.0PO5E0 ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION • EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST TOTAL BUDGET TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 9,000 $ 8,000 $ 8.000 $ 9.000 E 848 $ 8,152 $ 8,152 100%
Studies/Permining $ 16,000 $ 9,000 $ %000 $ 16,000 $ 7,000) $ 9,000 $ 4.513 50%
Consultant PSA $ 85,000 $ 139.095 $ 139,095 1 $ 139,095 $ 139.095 $ 101,142 73%
Design Staff $ 20,000 $ 47,905 $ 47,905 $ 20,000 $ 27,905 $ 47,905 $ 18,388 38%
Construction Contract $ 420,000 $ 400.000 $ 60,000 $ 460.000 $ - $ 861
Construction
Administration $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Construction
Inspection $ 3D000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Contingency $ 180,000 $ 126,000 $ (60.000) $ 66,000
Reimbursable Costs
TOTAL $ 81Q000 1 $ 810,000 $ - $ 810,000 $ 184,095 $ 20,057 $ 204,152 $ 133,056 65%
h)wp db@n9Wbd4comr d.kp2-WW2 84 budget InlnrmW,.n WNW
REVISED 1/4/02
r
r�l
, l
PDCCOMMITTEE MeetngDate rose.oroir.
oz o7/02 D21n1
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDCO2-09 141
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-66
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a sole source purchase order with OCS for reprographics services for Headworks
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, in the amount of$200,000.
SUMMARY
• Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, will have significant printing
costs associated with the design submittals over the next 2.5 years.
• The Engineering Department already has a blanket purchase order with OCB to provide
reprographic services. This company was selected through a competitive bidding
process. They are currently in their first year of a three-year time extension. They are
providing consistently good service and are thoroughly familiar with the District's
procedures.
• The Engineering Department would like to take advantage of the volume discount
associated with the existing purchase order with OCB.
• In order to track Department charges separate from 132-66 charges, staff recommends
that a separate purchase order be issued to OCB for reprographic services related to
the P2-66 project.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See the attached Budget Information Table. At this time, authorization for expenditure of
$180,000 is being requested
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item:section s, Page 57)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The attached Budget Information Table indicates a transfer of$230,000 from the
Contingency line to the Studies/Permitting line ($30,000)for additional staff effort, and to the
Design Staff line ($200,000) for additional printing charges. The proposed budget request
does not impact the project budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, is a large and costly design
project. During consultant negotiations, it was decided that project costs could be reduced if the
District procured the services of a printing company that already does a high volume of work for
the District. To this end, printing costs were not included in the consultant's final Scope of
Work.
A Scope of Work for printing services related to design submittals for P2-66 was sent to OCB.
OCB's printing cost for this work is estimated to be approximately$135,000 (estimate is
attached). This cost would be Incurred over a 2.5 year period.
Since we now plan to have OCB do other printing on the project, it is recommended that the
estimate be increased to $200,000.
Utilizing OCB for this project would have the following benefits:
• Use a company that understands our procedures
• Take advantage of volume discounts to reduce costs
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the funding increase. Not approving the funding would not allow the
Engineering Department to produce final design plans for distribution to staff, consultants,
and contractors.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. OCB Estimate
PK:jo:Jak
WntglobaMgenda Draft ReporbtPDCMR P246 020702Aoo
G:1w ftll.., dAge^C ReWI=07e 1e A,e .RBpPt 2...e 1410 n-d.
aemud. WOO Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2
JOB NO. P2-66
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 57.999 $ 72,000 $ 72,000 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 $ 62.072 85%
Studies/Permitting $ 92.400 $ 196.000 $ 30,000 $ 226,000 $ 196,000 S 30,000 $ 226.000 $ 225,921 100%
Consultant PSA 1 $ 360.301 $ 13,277.372 1 $ 13,277.372 $ 13,277,372 1 $ 13,277,372 1 $ 938,430 7%
Design Staff $ 90,100 $ 1,070,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,270,000 $ 1,070,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,270,000 1 $ 70,048 6%
Construction Contract $ 1,799.600 $ 110.002,000 $ 110.002,000
Construction
Administration $ 7.165,000 $ 7,165,000
Construction
Inspection $ 7,163,000 $ 7.163.000
Contingency $ 21.184,628 $ (230,000) $ 20,954,628
Reimbursable Costs
TOTAL $ 2.400.400 $ 160,130,000 $ - $ 160.130,000 $ 14,616,372 $ 230,000 $ 14,846.372 $ 1.296,471 9%
h%wp dlaNngtobs6mnaacls1y2 66rp2 65 revbed budget Inloenalion table 1-11ai
OCSD/P2-66
PPC PPC Workshop/Meeting Other Project
Vellum Full Size 12 Size Specs Materials Deliverables Documentation
Preliminary Design -200 OrI .
OCSD i set/1392.00 2 sets/144.00 35 sels11260.00 35 wpies/945.00 35 copies/2835.00
Carollo 1 sett72.00 18 sels/648.00 18 copies/486.00 18 wpies/1458.00
Peer Review Team 12 sets/432.00 12 wpies 972.00
Subconsultants 7 sels/252.00
CH2MHILL 3 wis/108.00
Permitting Agencies 3 sels/108.00
Subtotal: 1392.00 216.00 2808.00 1431.00 5266.00
Design Submittal No.1 -700 Ong.
OCSD 1 set/252.00 20 sels/2520.00 6 wpiestl62.00 6 wpies2916.00
Carollo 1 set252.00 18 sets2268.00 4 wpieel10e.00 2 copies/972.00
Peer Review Team 7 sets/882.00
Subconsullants 3 sets/378.00
CH2MHILL 2 sets252.00
Permitting Agencies
Subtotal: 504.00 6300.00 270.00 3888.00
Desi n Submittal No.2-1500 Orig.
OCSD 1 set/10440.00 1 mi/540.00 20 sets/5400.00 20 copies240.00 6 wpiesl324.00 6 wplesl5832.00
Carollo 1set/640.00 18 sets14860ol) 18wpiesHO8.00 4copies/216.00 2wples/1944.00
Multidisciplinary Checks 2 sets/1080.00 14 sets/3780.00 14 wpies/188.00
Subwnsultants 7"WI890.00 7 wpiesl84.00
CH2MHILL 4 sets/1080.00 4 copiea/48.00
Permitting Agencies 1 seU540.00 4 sets/1080.00 4 copies/48.00
Subtotal: 10440.00 2700.00 18090.00 696.00 $40.00 7776.00
Design Submittal No.3-1600 Drill.
OCSD 1 sel/10440.00 3 sets11620.00 20 sets/5400.00 20 wpie8240.00 6 wpleel98.00
Carollo 1 seV540.00 10"Is2700.00 10 wples/120.00 4 wpies/64.00
CH2MHILL 3 sels/810.00 3 coplee/36.00
Subwnsultants 2 sets/540.00 2 copies24.00
Subtotal: 10440.00 2160.00 9450.00 420.00 160.00
Final Deai n Submittal-1600 Ori M lars
OCSD 1 seV23670.00 3 sale/1620.00 20 sels/5400.00 20 wpies/240.00 20 co Ies1540.00 6 wpiesl96.00 6 wples/8480.00
Carollo 1 seV540.00 18 sets/4860.00 18 copies216.00 18 wpies/486.00 4 wpies/64.00 2 wpies2160.00
Subconsullants 4 sets/1080.00 4 copies/48.00
CH2MHILL 3sels/810.00 3copies/36.00
Permitting Agencies 4 setsHOB0.00 4 copies/48.00
Subtotal: 23670.00 2160.00 13230.00 588.00 1028.00 160,00 8840.00
Total: 45842.00 7740.00 49878.00 1104.0. 2457.00 .395,00 20304.00
brand Total: 134420.00
The above estimate does not Include set-up or finishing costs on planlspecs(I.e. binding,color stock,etc.)
PDC COMMITTEE Meeong Dd.of Dir.
z/07/0zate To B z/n/0z
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDCO2-10 19(j)_
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager
SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION
JOB NO. 1-2-4
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve a budget amendment of $2,480,000 for a total budget of$36,186,000
for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2.4; and (2)Approve Addendum
No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation
for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional
design engineering services for an additional amount of$237,567, increasing the
total amount not to exceed $1,205,475.
SUMMARY
• The project is located within the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley
and in Bushard Avenue between Ellis Avenue and Banning Road, Banning Road
between Bushard Avenue and Brookhurst, and Brookhurst between Banning
Road and Plant 2. The project consists of four miles of 108" sewer pipe.
• As the project design has proceeded, many unforeseen design needs arose.
• The Scope of Work for geotechnical exploration was changed because of the
City of Huntington Beach (CITY) permit requirements.
• The design work needed for city sewer relocations has expanded.
• An additional study for handling sewage flows during construction is needed.
• Additional design for reconstruction of the Plant No. 2 entrance is needed.
• Additional design of stone drain relocations to accommodate planned facilities is
needed.
• Design of changes in a city sewage pump station to accommodate the relocation
of a city force main is needed.
• A detailed survey of the existing pavement is needed to control construction
costs.
• A revision in the design of the connection of the new Bushard Trunk Sewer at
Plant No. 2 is needed.
• The District Computer Aided Drafting Standards have changed.
• The unforeseen design needs listed above make it necessary to amend the
professional service budget.
• The construction cost estimate of$28,322,000 exceeds the Construction
Contract budget of$24,505,000 by$3,817,000. This involves utility relocations,
including sewers, and greater than anticipated, pavement replacement needs.
Page 1
1
• Because the construction cost estimate increased and because the professional
services costs have increased, the budget needs to be modified by reallocation
of monies from the Contingency to Construction Contract and Consultant
Professional Services.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Allocate an additional $4,052,000 to project Construction Contract budget and
Consultant Professional Services budget by increasing the project budget
$2.480,000 and reallocating $1,577.000 from contigency.
See the attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2001-02, Section 8,Page 64:
Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Bushard Trunk Sewer
Rehabilitation,Job No. 1-2-4.)
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item) _
The overall budget will be increased by$2,480.000 to a total of$36.186,000. This
will allow the project to maintain a contingency of approximately 10% of the
construction cost estimate and to reallocate funds to the construction contract line
item and the consultant PSA line item. The constriction contract line item will
increase by$3,817,000 to$28,322,000; the consultant PSA line item will increase by
$240,000 to $1,550,000.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Geotechnial Work-City Permits: As part of the design efforts, several geotechnical
borings were made. Prior to contracting, the boring subconsultant attempted to
determine City of Huntington Beach (City) requirements for repair of the boring holes
but the City provided no information. In accordance with standard practice, the
subconsultant assumed the cuttings for the borings could be placed back in the
boreholes. When a permit was obtained for the borings, the subconsultant found the
City required removal of the soil cutting and filling of the holes with a cement slurry.
This increased the cost of the work by approximately$20,800.
City Sewer Relocations: The Design engineer assumed the existing City sewers
could be"siphoned" under the proposed Bushard sewer. During design, the City
objected and another method for handing the existing sewer conflicts with the
proposed Bushard Sewer was decided upon. This method necessitated additional
design work and drawings for relocations of the sewers. The additional design effort
cost$24,981.
Construction Handling of Sewage Flows: In February of 2000, Camp Dresser&
McKee, Inc. (CDM) investigated whether wastewater flows could be safely diverted
Page 2
i
i
into alternative sewers during the construction of Bushard Trunk Sewer. CDM also
found in their flow modeling that wet weather flows through the year 2005 could also
be safely diverted. Since flow diversion is a critical safety concern, Staff feels there
needs to be another independent verification of the safety of diverting flows. Boyle
Engineering has submitted a proposal with a cost of$33,068 for modeling the safety
of diverting flows.
Reconstruction of Plant 2 Entrance Design: The original design concepts were to
replace the landscaping, pavement, and facilities removed at Plant No. 2, in kind.
During the design, the best location for the project was found to be through the
entrance at Plant No. 2. Staff has requested that the replacement of the entrance
include improvements such as a guard station and new lighting. Staff has also
determined that the loss of the main entrance will require temporary and permanent
improvements to the other two entrances so operations can be maintained during
construction. Boyle Engineering has submitted a proposal for design, assisting in
permitting, and interacting with Staff to implement the improvements for$64,217.
Storm Drain Relocation: The City of Huntington Beach (City) is requiring, as part of
the permitting, that where the Bushard Trunk Sewer crosses an existing 48-inch
(CITY) storm drain at Adams Avenue, the sewer is designed to accommodate a
proposed increase in size of the storm drain to 114 inches. Boyle Engineering
reviewed the options for accommodating the drain and found a 114-inch storm drain
could not be accommodated but three separate structures could be used to handle
the separate drains upstream of Adams and join them downstream of the Bushard
Trunk Sewer to provide an approximately equivalent size structure. Due to vertical
constraints, the proposed structures could not be sized exactly equivalent. The
District met with the City and proposed an agreement to modify the proposed
Bushard Sewer in the future for accommodating the storm drain. The City was not
receptive to an agreement to modify, but they were receptive to the three structures.
The design of the three structures is outside the scope of the current design
contract. Boyle Engineering has submitted a proposal for$21,273 to do the design
work.
City Sewage Pump Station: As part of the utility relocation plans, the force main
from the Adams Pump Station will be rerouted over the Bushard Trunk Sewer. In
early November, the City stated that this relocation would change the pumping
characteristics and the pumps at the station would need to be upgraded. Staff has
reviewed the pump design data and concurs with the City. The additional design for
the pump station modifications will cost $4,144.
Pavement Survey: The City is requiring rebuilding the pavement base and
pavement over the entire Bushard Sewer construction trench width plus 12 feet on
each side, and overlaying the entire street with 2 inches of pavement. The District
believes that this requirement is excessive and has discussed it with the City. Staff
has estimated this repairing could increase the cost of the project by$1.5 million.
The City stated the requirement is the basis for permitting the construction work in
the street, but they will work with the District during construction to determine if the
actual work can be reduced. Staff recommends a pavement survey as a means to
document the existing pavement condition and work out an agreement with the City
Page 3
r
t
to provide an equivalent replacement or negotiate for cost sharing on improvements.
The cost of an engineering pavement survey is $42,091.
Plant 2 Connection: The current design is based upon concepts for replacement of
the headworks that have recently become outdated. When the current design was
done, it was believed to be flexible enough to accommodate the ultimate headworks
design, but this has not proven to be true. The cost of redesigning the headworks is
$3,993.
Computer Aided Drafting Standards: After the preliminary design was complete, the
District changed the CAD standards for better consistency of design and to
accommodate filing of computer designs. Subsequent plans were modified to meet
the new standards. Boyle Engineering originally believed they could accommodate
the changes in the budget, but were unable to. The additional cost for modifying the
plans is$23,000.
ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives are proposed.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on
October 27, 1999. The project was included in Addendum No. 3 to EIR approved on
December 19, 2001. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. This
addendum will not change CEQA findings.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
3. Proposal for Amending Professional Services Contract
LAR:jo:sa
G:\wp.dtatagenda\PDMOOZ4genda Reports\02-10-1-24-020702.d.
Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION
CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4
ORIGINAL' . CURRENT PROPOSED PFRbPOSED a ]FUNDS, THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
.PROJECT7rASK/, BAUTHORIZED PROJECT: BBDOET 1 g&9ED i7 i110RIZED AUTHORIZATION. TOTAL EXPENDITURE 'F�iGENOEO
Y BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BfIDOET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
'roect Development $ 7,800 $ 74,000 $ - $ 74,000 $ 72871 $ 72,871 $ 72.871 100%
Studies/Permitting $ 15,002 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $ 4,976 $ 4,976 $ 4,976 100%
Consultant PSA $ 260.900 $ 1,310,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,309,236 $ 237.567 $ 1,546,803- $ 1.190.907 26%
Design Staff $ 790,824 $ 284,000 $ 284,000 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 $ 155,039 54%
Construction Contract $ 21,217,321 $ 24.505,000 $ 3.817.000 $ 28,322,000 $
Construction
Administration $ 1.049.624 $ 1,199,000 $ 1.199,000 $
Construction
Inspection $ 1,913,106 $ 1,918,000 1 $ 1.918,000 1 1$
Contingency $ 7.548.924 $ 4.410,000 $ 1,577.000 $ 2.833,000 $
PROJECT TOTAL $ 32,803.501 $ 33,706,000 $ 2.480.000 $ 36,186,000 $ 1,675,083 $ 237.567 $ 1.552.067 $ 1,423,793 92%
Reimbursable Costs
PROJECT NET 1 $ 32,803,501 1 $ 33,706,000 $ 2,480,000 1$ 36,186.000 1 $ 1.675,083 1$ 237,567 $ 1,552,067 1 $ 1,423,793 1 92%
'Includes PSA with DGA for Project Report and Engineering Services,and PSA with Tran Consulting Engineers for Sewer Pipeline Inspection/Evaluation.
G:\wp.dlaleriM7204ein\I-2d\Psa-Agenda RplIPMendum 44bedgel tablel-24 12-27-01.4s]Disbicts
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Bushard Trunk Sewer
Contract No. 1-2-4
Total Project Budget: $30,630,000
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Start Date of Project: June 14, 2000
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs
4/26/00 Original PSA Engineering design and construction support $845.300 $845,300
services for replacement and/or rehabilitation of
Bushard Trunk Sewer.
1/11/01 Addendum No.1 Increasing the utility search activities to include 37 $24,800 $870,100
additional potholes
3/21/01 Addendum No. 2 Provide for additional study of City of Huntington $12,808 $882,908
Beach sewer interfacing.
6/27/01 Addendum No. 3 Provide for groundwater hydraulic testing and $85,000 $967,908
include fiber optic cable conduit in the construction
documents
Pending Addendum No. 4 Additional engineering services including $237,567 $1,205,475
geotechnical boring work, City sewer relocation,
study of flow handling for construction, Plant 2
entrance modifications, City storm drain relocation
at Adams Blvd., pavement survey, and the
connection to Plant 2.
\VwdWaWl\wp.dlelenpV20"ln\I-24 Poe-Agenda RpMddendum M-24 PSA SWtus RpWdoc 01/21/02
Revised 05114M
,
1501 Quail Street _
Newport Beach, CA 92660-2726
TEL: (949)476-3300
FAX: (949)721-7142 '
www.boyleengineering.com
Larry Rein January 15,2002
Project Manager OC-C1I-150-o2
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 Ellis Avenue
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Request for Additional Services
Dear Larry:
Over the past few months a number of out-of-scope issues have been brought to the District's
attention. It is our understanding that the District staff intends to present these to the Board for
approval. To assist the staff and Board,we discuss those requests in this one letter.
GeotechnW Work-City Permits:
Summarv: As part of the geotechnical investigations,Geomatrix drilled borings along the
pipeline route.Prior to contracting,Geomatrix attempted to determine City of Huntington Beach
requirements for replacement of material in the boring holes but the City provided no
information. In accordance with standard practice, Geomatrix assumed the cuttings for the
borings could be placed back in the boreholes.When a permit was obtained for the borings,the
City of Huntington Beach required removal of the soil cutting and filling of the holes with
cement slurry. This cost was not anticipated and Exhibit 1 is the letter from Geomatrix
indicating a cost of$23,802.30.This request was made in summer,2001. Subsequently, staff
has indicated that they believe that$20,800 is representative of the additional services. Attached
as Exhibit 2 is a modified letter from Geomatrix accepting the$20,800 figure.
Request and Basis: $20,800 based on Geomatrix letter requesting reimbursement. Geomatrix
confirmed the acceptance of the revised amount from the original request for$20,800 to Boyle
verbally.
Timin¢: Work has been completed.
Exhi it : 1. Original Geomatrix letter requesting reimbursement.
ADDL SERV REQUEST
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
�o-wno.
Larry Rein January 15, 2002
e
Page 2
City Sewer Relocations:
Summary: Boyle assumed in our original proposal and during negotiations that the existing City
of Huntington Beach sewers which cross the new Bushard Trunk Sewer(BTS)could be
"siphoned" under the proposed Bushard sewer. During design, the City of Huntington Beach
objected to this and instead requested the design of new transmission lines to avoid the inverted
siphons.This necessitated additional design work and drawings for relocations of the sewers.
Please note the following:
a. The District's RFP did not identify the need for the design of Huntington Beach
(H.B.) sewers (paralleling the BTS) instead of lowering existing City inverted
siphons.
b. Our proposal and detailed fee breakdown did not include funds for this additional
design work.
c. A reasonable assumption would have been that a few inverted siphons in the H.B.
system needed to be lowered. As stated, the City sought enhancements and the
District agreed.
d. The entire design process has been rendered less efficient because of the time
required for City submittals and their requests. Of course, it has to be recognized
that the City will be significantly impacted by this major project. Nevertheless,
the process has been somewhat more difficult due to experiences on past District
Projects.
The City sewer system requirements resulted in the design efforts to produce about 8 plan sheets
for the parallel lines,The sheets included the City's standard specifications which in themselves
created an additional sheet. The new lines are 8", 10", 18" and 27". Fortunately,we already had
the base file to work with and this reduces the cost per sheet.
Request and Basis: $24,981 based on the estimates for the additional sheets involved in the
design, along with the additional work on the specifications. Exhibit 3 is the breakdown of the
request.
It should be noted that no request is being made for facilities such as the City of Fountain Valley
Channel Crossing, which although costly could have been reasonably anticipated.
The calculation is as follows:
Design Calcs.8 hrs. x $48.001hr. _ $ 384
Design Plans 96 hrs. x $47.001hr. _$ 4,512
Coordination,specs and QC 50 hrs x 48.00/hr. _$ 2,400
Cadd 100 hrs. x $ 38.00[hr. _ $ 3,800
qC{l 1.150-01/.v/ADDLSERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15, 2002
r Page 3
Subtotal labor (burdened) = $ 11,096
Overhead @ 102% = $ 11,318
Subtotal = $ 22,414
Profit @ 9.22% = $ 2,067
Other direct costs = $ 500
Total = $ 24,981
Timi : Work is almost complete. Ninety(90)%comments have been received from the City on
the plans and we are awaiting comments on the specifications.
Construction Handling of Sewage Flows:
Summary: In February of 2000, CDM, under contract to the District, investigated whether
wastewater flows could be safely diverted into alternative sewers during the construction of the
BTS.The conclusion apparently was that flows could be diverted through 2005,even during
winter wet periods. District staff requested that Boyle independently verify this conclusion.
Therefore, Boyle submitted a proposal for modeling the safety of diverting flows.
Reauest and Basis: $33,058 based on the Attached scope and proposed fees. Our request
includes revisions following our meeting on December 11, 2001.
The calculation is as follows:
Analysis by Princ.Engr. 26 x$72.00/hr. _ $ 1,872
Analysis by Engr.84 his. x $42.00/hr. _ $ 3,528
QC hrs. 4 x 90.00/hr. _ $ 360
Word Process. 2 his. x$32 = $ 64
Subtotal labor (burdened) _ $ 5,842
Overhead @ 102'% . -� _ $ 5,940
Subtotal = $ 11,782
Profit @ 9.22% _ $ 1,086
Other direct costs = $ 20,200•
Total $ 33,068
•$20,000 flow monitoring by ADS - 5 meters for one month. No mark-up by Boyle. $200 other
direct.
Timing: Not an issue for the construction contract package(unless a problem develops). We
anticipate the analysis to be ready for review within two(2) months of notice-to-proceed.
Exhibi 2. Construction Handling of Sewage Flows—Scope and Fee
(based on billing fee basis, note the slight difference when using the districts
formula)
OC-Cll-I50-D21.v ADDLSERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15, 2002
Page 4
Reconstruction of Plant 2 Entrance Design:
Summary: The original design concepts were to replace the landscaping, pavement and facilities
removed at Plant 2 in kind. During the design, the best location for the new trunk sewer was
identified to be through the area of the current Plant 2 entrance. This includes the need to
demolish the existing guard building.District staff has requested that the replacement of the
entrance include improvements such as a new guard station, new lighting, changes in the
circulation and driving lanes to better accommodate truck traffic, and changes to the gates.
Boyle has submitted a proposal for design, assisting in permitting, and interacting with staff to
implement the improvements. This work does not include the necessary design for
improvements to the Banning and Bushard entrances.
The task needs were thoroughly discussed in our status meeting on December 11,2001, as a
result, we revised the scope and fee proposal.
It is important to note that:
a. The fees reflect the fact that there are many components and several disciplines
involved. Traditional percentage of construction figures used on single-focus
assignments simply do not apply.
b. Now is the time to make changes. The entrance area will be heavily impacted by
construction and the guard building removed at the very least, it needs to be
replaced, although in the preliminary design phase there was direction to Boyle
that it would not be replaced.
c. The revised fees assume that plans will be made available from the Plant No. 1
Guard Building which will then be reviewed for general conformance with the
needs for Plant No. 2 entrance. Further, security systems and landscaping is now
excluded and will be considered at a later date,either for design by Boyle or by
the District.
Request and Basis: $64,217 based on the attached scope and fee.
The calculation is as follows:
Princ. Engr. 72 x $ 74.00/hr. = $ 5,328
Senior Engr. 128 hrs. x $60.00/hr. = $ 7,680
Engineer 167 hrs. x $46.00/hr. = $ 7,682
Card hrs. 180 x 40.00/hr. = $ 7,200
Word Process. 33 hrs. x$ 30 = $ 990
Subtotal Labor (burdened) = $ 28,880
Overhead @ 102% = $ 29,458
Subtotal = $ 58,338
Profit ® 9.22% = $ 5,379
OC-CII-I SO-OEm/ADDLSERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15, 2002
Page 5
Other direct costs = $ 500
Total = $ 64,217
Timin : This design has not yet occurred, Certain portions may be incorporated into the BTS
contract and the District as part of a separate project may construct other elements.
Exhibit(s): 3. Plant No. 2 Entrance—Scope and fee (based on billing fee basis, note the
slight difference when using the districts formula)
Adams Avenue Storm Drain Relocation:
arum : The City of Huntington Beach is requiring, as part of the permitting,that where the
Bushard Sewer crosses an existing 48 inches city storm drain at Adams Boulevard, the sewer is
designed to accommodate a proposed increase in size of the storm drain to 114 inches. Our
preliminary analysis indicates that multiple structures(i.e. squash boxes) will be required to
accommodate the flows in a 114-inch pipeline. This includes 3 boxes and special connection
structures. A single structure could have been employed based on a 60-inch pipeline,but the
larger size creates a much more severe situation.The District and Boyle met with the City of
Huntington Beach and proposed an agreement to modify the storm drain system in the future if
the 114-inch pipeline is installed The City was not receptive to an agreement to modify but they
were receptive to the three structures. The design of the three structures is outside the scope of
the current design contract.
Due to the complexities of the work,we anticipate the following sheets:
Plan and Profile 2 sheets
Structural 2 sheets
Traffic Control 1 sheet
Changes to other sheets 0.5 sheets equivalent
Boyle has submitted a proposal for the design work.
Rgguest and Basis: $21,200 based on the attached scope and fee. It should be noted that the
construction costs of the improvements could exceed$200,000.
The calculation is as follows:
Design Calcs. 16 his. x $52.00/hr. _ $ 832
Design Plans 80 hrs. x $47.00/hr. _ $ 3,760
Coordination,specs and QC 30 his x 48.00/hr. _ $ 1,440
Cadd 95 hrs. x $ 38.00[hr. _ $ 3,610
Subtotal Labor (burdened) _ $ 9,642
Overhead @ 102% _ $ 9,835
Subtotal = $ 19,477
Profit @ 9.22% _ $ 1,796
Total = $ 21,273
DGCI 1450-GV.m /ADDL SERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15,2002
Page 6
e
Timing: The design work has not yet been done. However, it is critical to the project.
City Sewage Pump Station:
Summary: As pan of the utility relocation plans, the force main from the Adams Pump Station
will be rerouted over the Bushard Trunk Sewer. In early November,the City stated that this will
increase the pumping head by 4 feet and change the pumping characteristics and the pumps at the
station would need to be upgraded from 3 horsepower motors to 5 horsepower motors and the
impellers from 6rh inch to 6'/e inch. Boyle and the District staff have reviewed the pump curves
and concur with the,City.
Including this work in the BTS contract entails confirming sufficient room for the new motors
and any electrical modifications. It is assumed no changes are required to the controls or
structure. Electrical details would need to be added to the plans and specifications to cover both
the pump impeller change and electricallmotor changes.
Request and Basis: $4,144.
The calculation is as follows:
Design 26 hrs. x $48.00/hr. _ $ 1,248
Cadd 18 hrs. x $ 35.00/hr. _ $ 630
Subtotal Labor (burdened) _ $ 1,878
Overhead @ 102% = $ 1,916
Subtotal $ 3,794
Profit @ 9.22% _ $ 350
Total $ 4,144
Timine: No design has yet been accomplished. The design and work is only indirectly related to
the BTS project and need not be included in the main contract.
Pavement Survey:
Summary:The City of Huntington Beach,as part of their review requested that the BTS project
rebuild the pavement base and pavement over the entire Bushard Sewer construction trench
width plus 12 feet plus and then overlaying the entire street with 2 inches of pavement. The Staff
has felt this requirement is excessive and they have discussed this with the City. District staff
has estimated this could increase the cost of the project by $1.5 million.The City stated they
will not waive the requirement but can work with the District during construction to determine if
the actual work can be reduced, most importantly the requirement for a new pavement section up
to 12 ft. wider than the trench on each side. District staff recommended to Boyle that a
pavement survey be conducted as a means to determine the existing pavement condition. With
that information,the District could then talk to the City and develop an agreement with the City
to provide an equivalent replacement or negotiate for cost sharing on improvements.
OC-CI I-I 5042/.v/ADDL SERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15,2002
i Page 7
Request and Basis: $42,000 including the subconsultant. The pavement survey will be
performed by LaBelle-Marvin as a subconsultant to Boyle. A detailed scope of work is attached.
Note that work is to be accomplished in two phases. The preconst. survey is$19,995 and the
post-const. survey is $16,995 for a total of$36,990. Boyle costs include up to three (3)meetings
to discuss results and to provide strategy,along with correspondence and an allowance of 6 hrs.
for specification changes. Not included are design changes as a result of the findings.
The calculation is as follows:
Mtgs and sub. Coord. 26 hrs.x$ 80.00/hr. = $ 2,184
Cadd-none. = $ 0
Clerical 4 hrs x$32.00/hr. = $ 128
Subtotal Labor (burdened) = $ 2,312
Overhead @ 102%u = $ 2,358
Subtotal = $ 4,670
Profit @ 9.22% = $ 431
LaBelle-Marvin subconsultant cost = $ 36,990
Total = $42,091
Exhibits : 4. Pavement Survey—Proposal from LaBelle-Marvin.
Plant 2 Connection: _
Summary: The current design is based on earlier concepts for the new headworks design.
However,the preliminary design of the headworks project at Plant 2 has progressed to a point
where a new location has been established,necessitating a change in the location of the junction
structure to the existing BTS in Plant 2. This requires revisions to the current design. In
addition,the existing BTS downstream of the junction structure will be required to remain in
operation until the new headworks is in operation (6—7 years). The recently completed internal
inspection of the existing BTS pipe revealed that the portion downstream of the junction
structure should be rehabilitated to provide service until the new headworks is place in operation.
This work will also be included in the BTS contract.
Re guest and Basis: $3,993 based on an estimate of the required work.
The calculation is as follows:
Design 20 his. x$45.00/hr. = $ 900
Cadd 26 hrs. x$35.00/hr. = $ 910 -
Subtotal Labor (burdened) = $ 1,810
Overhead C& 102% = $ 1,846
Subtotal = $ 3,656
Profit 0 9.22% = $ 337
Total = $ 3,993
OC-C11.150.=.m IADDLSERV REQUEST
Larry Rein January 15, 2002
Page 8
Timin•: Needs to be accomplished along with the current design or will have to be a change
order item.
Computer Aided Drafting Standards:
Summary: The new District CADD standards were provided after the preliminary design
submittal and approval. This was done for better consistency of design and to accommodate
filing of computer designs, we understand. We could have taken the posture that it was too late
to change the CADD layout for the plans. This would not have been in the District's best
interest. Therefore, we spent the time to understand the needed changes and to implement them.
District staff can confirm our efforts in this regard.
This work included the following:
• Files required renaming. This particularly affected the various reference files and
required revision of each of the sheet files for the entire set of plan and profile sheets.
• Drawing assembly required the removal of all "hard-coded" paths in all files as well as
changing the reference file attachment type to"overlay"
• Implementation of new border file and attributed block in each sheet file
• Layer names were changed. This required changing the layer names in all of the files to
comply with the new standards.
• All text fonts changed.
• All text heights changed.
• Line colors changed to conform to the plotting guidelines.
• The new north arrow and scale bar required replacing in each of the sheet files.
• Drawing references changed including the match lines, to conform to the new sheet
naming convention.
A new cover sheet was developed from the template.
Reauest and Basis: $23,000 based on the attached fee breakdown. Revision of the files, etc. of
twenty six plan and profile sheets were affected by the CADD standards. We have reviewed the
CADD drafting effort and estimate the portion required to make the revisions was 260 hours of
CADD operator time. This equates to a fee of$23,000.
The calculation is as follows:
OC,CI I-150-0Ymv IADDLSERV REQUEST
Lary Rein January 15, 2002
Page 9
260Ins. x$40.09/hr. (average of personnel) = $ 10,425 (burdened)
Overhead @ 102% = $ 10,633
Subtotal = $ 21,058
Profit @ 9.22% = $ 1,942
Total = $ 23,000
Timing: Work has been accomplished.
Summary of Requests:
The following table summarizes the current requests:
Request Burd. Overhead Sub.Cons. or Profit-no Total
Labor (102%) other dir. mark-up on subs
Geotech. $20,800 with no $20,800
Borings mark-up
City $11,096 $11,318 $500 $2067 $24,981
Sewers
Flow $5,842 $5,940 $20,200 with no $1086 $33,068
Handling mark-up
Plant No. 2 $28,880 $29,458 $500 $5,379 $64,217
Entrance
Adams Ave. $9,642 $9,835 $0 $1,796 $21,273
Storm Drain
City Pump $1,878 $1,916 $0 $ 350 $4,144
Station
Pavement $2,312 $2,358 $36,990 $431 $42,091
Survey
Plant No. 2 $1,810 $1,846 $0 $ 337 $3,993
Connection
Cadd $10,426 $10,632 $0 $1,942 $23,000
Standards
Totals 1 $71 886 1 $73,103 1 $78 90 $13 88 $237 67
Please contact me should you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Boyle Engineering Corporation
: 5 `
Richard L.Bardin
Project Manager
ATTACHMENTS Exhibits listed above
OC-CI 1-150-021.v/ADDLSERV REQUEST
Or -C //- /SG -off
33 W.Bey Streec.S ice i1 CC
[]Deese Meese,r aifo 92627
(�sl 2-0 .F4 (94s1642 74 GEOMATRIX
August 20,2001
6082
Mr.Richard Bardin
Boyle Engineering Corporation
1501 Quail Street
Newport Beach,California 92660
Subject: Request for Additional Compensation
Suchard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation
Huntington Beach, California
Dear Mr. Bardin:
As we have discussed previously,our January 20,2000 Proposal for Geotechnical Services for
the subject project envisioned that excavated drilling spoils would be used for backfilling
exploratory borings. Accordingly,our"not-to-exceed" fee of$71,000 specifically precluded
slurry backfill for borings, handling/storage/disposal of soils and analytical testing to check for
contaminants in the soil. As you know,permit conditions imposed on us by both the Cities of
Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley required slurry backfilling of borings and disposal of the
drill cuttings. Additionally,the Orange County Sanitation District required us to perform
analytical testing of the soils prior to letting us dispose of the soils at their treatment plant.
Consequently,we are presenting this letter to request additional compensation to cover extra
costs incurred by Geomatnx.
A breakdown of our extra costs is shown on the attached Cost Breakdown. You will note that
our extra costs total $23,8002.30. We respectfully request that you amend our current contract to
cover these extra charges.
If you have any questions,please contact the undersigned at(949)642-0245.
Sincerely,
13EOMATRIX C NSULTANTS,INC.
esa
ice President and
cipal Geotechmcal Engineer
P M.WUAn WdCap
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
nwx, neabgmo. a I3nbrnm W Sdaxiafs
% OEOMATRI%
a
COST BREAKDOWN
Extra Services Related to Slurry Backfilling and Soil Disposal
Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilittiou
Slum BackfdBna
Each boring required 1.0 hr. to slurry backfill
Driller 1.0/boring x 46 borings x$150/hr. $ 6,750.00
Geomatrix Staff Engineer 1/0 hr/boring x 45 borings x$82/hr. $ 3,695.00
Cement 134 bags @$9.20/bag $ 1,232.80
Bentonite 57 bgs @$11,50/bag $ 655.50
Hydrogel 8 bags @$11,50/bag $ 92.00
Subtotal Slurry Backfilling $12,4230.30
Soil Disposal
Each boring required 0.75 hr to haul materials to LCSD treatment plant
Drillers 0.75 hr./boring x 45 borings x$1501hr. $ 5,062.50
Geomatrix Staff Engineer 0.75 hr./boring x 45 borings x$82/hr. $ 2,767.50
Service Truck 18 days x$90/day $ 1,620
Rental of Roll-Away Environment Bin for Soil Cuttings
Plastic liner 1 liner x$35/liner $ 35.00
Bin Delivery 1 trip x$265/trip $ 265.00
Dump Soil and
Bin Pick-Up 1 trip x$375/trip $ 375.00
Bin Rental 58 days x$11.50/day $ 667.00
Analytical Laboratory Costs
EPA 418.1 5 tests x$45/test $ 225.00
EPA 805/8020 5 tests x$40/tests $ 200.00
EPA 8015 Carbon Chain ID 3 tests x$55/test $ 165.00
Subtotal Soil Disposal $ 1,382.00
TOTAL EXTRA COSTS 9ZJ
PWse.000.a WdC..*. «
SOWLE
1501 Quail Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660-2726
TEL: (949)476-3300
FAX: (949)721-7142
wwm noyleengi neering.com
Larry Rein January 16, 2002
Project Manager oc-clvtw'°Z
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"Ellis Avenue
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Proposed Scope of Services
Dear Larry:
In Dave Ludwin's letter to me dated November 131°the District has requested that Boyle verify
work done by Camp Dresser and McKee relative to the diversion of flows from the existing
Bushard Trunk Sewer(BTS)such that the line can be removed from service during construction
of the new BTS.
Proposed Scope of Services
1. Meeting. Meet with OCSD Engineering and Operations staff to discuss methods and
expectations for the work.
2. Review of Analysis from CDM and Review. CDM's February letter report addressing
diversion of flow from the existing Bushard Trunk Sewer will be reviewed for background
information.
3. Hydraulic Analysis. The District is looking at diverting flows as soon as possible away from
the existing Bushard Trunk Sewer south of Ellis Avenue before construction of the New
Bushard Trunks Sewer(NBTS)commences and continuing diversion until the NBTS
construction is complete. Therefore, initially flow will need to be diverted from the
Magnolia Trunk to the Knott Interceptor and the Miller-Holder Trunk. This can be
accomplished through Diversions 50 and 7 at Orangethorpe Ave.,Diversion 17 at Boise Ave.
and Diversion 95 at Ellis Ave. In this scheme the critical trunks will be the entire reaches of
the Knott Interceptor/Interplant Interceptor from Orangethorpe Ave. to Plant 2 and the
Miller-Holder Trunk from Ellis Ave. to Plant 2.
CDM,in their February 14, 2000 report,analyzed this scenario (Case 5)utilizing their dynamic
hydraulic computer model. As an independent analysis we propose this scenario be checked by
actual flow diversion and flow monitoring. We understand during the District's recent internal
inspection of the existing Bushard Trunk flows were diverted in this fashion and the system
REVISED FLOW CONDITIONS MtOFOSAL I-ET1ER
BOYI.E ENGINEERING CORPORATION
A., .. ..
Larry Rein January 16, 2002 -
Page 2
proved to work satisfactorily. We propose the flows again be diverted during the month of
January as described above and flow meters be installed at critical locations in the Knott
Interceptor between Orangethorpe Ave. and Ellis Ave. Five flow meters are projected for the
month of January 2002. The flow metered results will be analyzed to determine the remaining
capacity that exists. An allowance will be added to the metered flows to account for wet weather
conditions and for an increase due to growth to year 2005.
After the diversion structure at Ellis Avenue is constructed on the NBTS, flow from the
Magnolia Trunk can be diverted to the Knott Interceptor easterly along Ellis Ave.to the .
Interplant Interceptor in Brookhurst Ave. without any of the upstream diversions described
above. To analyze this scenario,the HGL in the Interplant Line and the Knott Interceptor
starting from the headworks at Plant 2 to the new diversion structure at Ellis Bushard will be
calculated. The resulting water surface in the new diversion structure will be compared to the
normal depths in the Knott&Magnolia Trunks at Ellis Ave. to confirm satisfactory conditions
within these two trunks at Ellis Ave.
4. Physical System Evaluation. Independently review with the District's Engineering and
Operations staff the various aspects of the structures and operational sequence necessary to
divert flows during the construction of the new BTS.
5. Meet with District. Assume a meeting to discussTtndings.
6. Letter Report of Findings. Prepare a letter discussing the findings.
7. Proiect Management and Ouality Control. Assume 6 hours of project management and to
provide for a quality control review by a person not otherwise associated with the
assignment.
Proposed Fees
Boyle proposes to perform the above work as an addendum to our existing contract with the
following fees:
Task Item Proposed Fee
1. Meet $ 830
2. Receive Information 210
3. Hydraulic Simulation 7960
4. Physical Analysis 830
5. Meeting 730
6. Letter Report 1,874
7. Project Management &QC _ 2
Boyle Subtotal$13,304
Flow Monitoring by ADS 20.000
Total $33,304
OC.CI I-150-OSmv REVISED ROW CONDRIONS PROPOSAL LETTER
Larry Rein January 16, 2002
Page 3
Schedule
We anticipate completing this assignment within two weeks of receipt of final flow monitoring
results. If flow monitoring continues through the month of January,the final report will be
submitted mid-February.
We appreciate the opportunity to perform this very critical review for the District.
Sincerely,
Boyle Engineering Corporation
Richard L..Bardin
Project Manager
OGCI1-150-021mv/REVISED FLAW CONDITIONS PROPOSAL LETTER
Project Budget
Bushard Trunk Sewer Orange County Sanitation District
Flow Diversion Analysis
y Personnel Hours Budget
Y Y y
Task Description
ZO
01 a ii o
Flow Diversion Analysis
1. Initial Meeting 4 211 6 $ 830 11$ 830
2. Review CDM Analysis 2 2 $ 210 $ 210
3. Hydraulic Analysis 8 64 72 S 7960 $ 7,960
Flow Monitoring-5 meters for one month b ADS $ $ 20,000 $ 20,000
4. Physical System Analysis 4 2 6 S 830 $ $30
5. Meeting with Results 2 4 6 $ 730 $ 730
6. Letter Report 4 10 2 16 S 1.774 S 100 $ 1,974
7, &Pm' t Mana ement 4 4 $ 620 $ 620
Computer $ E 250 $ 250
subtotal 26 84 2 112 $ 1 954 1 $ 22aso f 3 04
Total 26 84 2 1112111 12.95413 20 SO E 33
1.
Amounts shown are fee.
Personnel Catee0ry SM
Principal Engineer $155.00
Associate Engineu $105.00
Wonl Ptocessar $52.00
1It6a)2 Pane 1 or t Boyle Engmenng CoWahon
Proposed Scope and Fee
Bushard Trunk Sewer Project
Plant No. 2 Entrance
Understandings:
a. The improvements will address security,functionality and aesthetic concerns.
b. The entrance road off Brookhurst St. will be widened to create two incoming lanes.
The left lane will be for visitors and deliveries that need to stop at the guard building
for approval to enter. The right lane will be for traffic that does not have to stop at
the guard building.There should be a stacking allowance for two vehicles or one
vehicle and one truck in the lane that will be stopped while allowing traffic on the
other lane to proceed. The entrance and exit roads will be of a material that provides
better traction than the existing stamped concrete but is also aesthetically attractive.
The front entrance island will be redesigned as to not inhibit the view of the entrance
or street. The existing configuration of the parking area within the plant will be
improved to provide better turning radii for the larger delivery trucks. The parking
improvements will also provide improved traffic circulation.
c. Improved signage will include new directional signage for entrance lanes and a new
plant sign. The directional signage will be placed in a manner as to provide the
appropriate information, but not detract from the appearance of the entrance. The
new entrance sign shall be functionally and aesthetically appropriate for the area and
use of the plant. It is assumed that OCSD staff prior to start of design will provide
new plant sign text.
d. Security lighting will be provided at the entrance. It is to be non-obtrusive to traffic
on Brookhurst. For this, it is assumed that adequate power is available in the
immediate vicinity of the entrance and that there will not be need for a new service.
e. Gates will be changed from the current rotating gates to slide gates. The exit gate is to
have pavement detectors (or other automatic system)that will trigger the gate to open.
The gate control should be improved to allow remote operation from the OPS center.
District to further describe. It is noted that the existing concrete wall panels
may have to be re-done in the vicinity of the retracting slide gate.
f. The layout and configuration of the new security building will such to accommodate
existing features of the plant,such as utilities, walls and landscaping as well as
provide improved comfort, vision of the plant parking area and parking for the
security officer. The security building is to be increased in size to accommodate a
room with a table for video detection equipment. Boyle will provide electrical
service to the guard building for outlets as well as conduits for telephone and CCTV
equipment. With respect to the latter, it is assumed that the District will take care of the
actual equipment and connections. The existing guard building is split-face concrete
block with a Flat roof.The new security building will have a less institutional appearance,
perhaps with a pitched metal standing seam roof and wider overhangs for protection
when it is necessary to approach incoming vehicles.
The security building will provide doors/windows to allow the security officer to
access incoming vehicles from the building directly, and exist the building without
interference from incoming vehicles. Bathroom full height walls will be located
adjacent to the entry lanes leaving the rear of the guard building on the exit side fully
glazed to permit viewing exiting vehicles as they approach the gate from the plant.
The security building will have a handicapped accessible bathroom and a sink if
adequate connection to existing lateral sewers is possible without causing a situation
that would create odors or high probability of overflows from surcharged sewers at
the plant.It is assumed that the sink does not need hot water. (District to confirm)
Security building will be adequately lighted both on the interior and exterior. The
security building's laminated and tinted glass windows will reduce glare from the
sun, and provide safety for the security officer and equipment inside. All Controls
and electronics for the gate system should be hidden.
g. Landscaping at the entrance is to be modified to present a more pleasing and less
'institutional' appearance. It is assumed that adequate water service is in the
immediate vicinity and that Boyle will be responsible for both landscaping and
irrigation.
Assumptions:
a. Existing topographic mapping from the Bushard Project will be sufficient. Additional
survey,if needed, will either be by field survey as an additional service or as
furnished by the District.
b. No geotechnical services will be included. For the building Boyle shall assume
conservative values for bearing values or the District will provide such information.
c. No formal entitlement processing will be required from the City of Huntington Beach
(i.e.Planning Commission)and no City approvals will be required with the possible
exception of changes in street curbs.
d. The objective is to ready the work covered under this scope item such that the work
can be included as an addendum to the Bushard Trunk Sewer Project or at the very
least is negotiated into that contract prior to fieldwork on that Project.
e. Bid and Construction Phase Services will be determined at a later date.
2
f. With respect to the guard building, it is assumed that the building will essentially be
the same size and with the same features as the current guard building at Plant 1.
g. The existing electrical and telephone service is adequate.
CCTV design will be by others.
Scope of Services:
1. Assignment Kick-off
a. Kick-off visit and meeting. Visit the site with District personnel for the purposes
of discussing concepts and intentions. Also visit Plant No. 1 entrance. Assume
Civil,Arch. and Landscape representation from Boyle team.
b. Receive Documents. Receive from the District plans for existing guard building,
electrical, telephone,CCTV, and landscapelirrigation systems.
2. Concept Development
a. Site Plan/sl: Develop a concept plan showing the outlines of pavement,lanes,
and location of guard building and security lighting.
b. Guard Building. Utilize the guard building at Plant 1 for the basis.
c. Meeting with District. Meet with the District to discuss the concepts.
d. Meeting with Homeowners Association. Attend a meeting of the S.E. H.B.
H.O.A to discuss the changes.
3. Plans
a. CLvil. Assumed are the following:
-No title sheet
-Plan Sheet (1)
-Detail Sheet (1)including pavement,curb and gutter
-Demolition Plan (1)
- Signs (1) and sliding gate
b. Structural/Architectural. Assumed are the following:
- S-1, Roof&Foundation Plan
- S-2,Building Floor Plan &Details
- S-3, Section and Details
- S4,Walls and Footing for Slide Gate
- S-5 & 6,Notes and Typical Details
c. Electrical/Communications. Assumed are the following,
3
- E-1 Symbols,Notes,Abbreviations and Electrical Site Plan
- E-2 Guard Building Lighting, Power and Communications Plan &Single-Line
Diagram
- E-3 Electrical Details
d. Mechanical. Assumed are the following:
Note: will need for the heating and air conditioning for building, if required.
4. Specifications
a. Ovil. Provide technical specifications for the work Assume combined into
Bushard Contract.
b. Structural/Architectural. Same as above.
c. Electrical. Same as above.
d. Mechanical. Same as above
5. Opinion of Probable Cost
a. Civil. Provide opinion of probable cost for the work
b. StructuraVArchitectural. Same as above.
c. Electrical. ame as above.
d. Mechanical. Same as above.
6. Meetings,Project Management&Quality Control
a. Meetings. In addition to those called out elsewhere,assume up to 2 additional
meetings, attended by 3 Boyle personnel.
b. Project Management, Assume 1.5 hours per week for a 1.5-month period.
c. Qualty Control. Provide a QC review by persons not otherwise associated with
the assignment.
4
Project Budget
Plant No. 2 Entrance Orange County Sanitation District
Personnel Hours Budget
m
s.
`c
Task Description o $
$ W w S n
Z a to v m o a e 3
U � Z
I- Pmleet Klek•oH
a. Kickoff Movang am Site Visit 9 3 2 14 $ 1,983 $ 25 S 2.008
b. Receive Docvnten" 0 4 S 400 S 25 5 425
5 S
S S
$ f
Subtotal 9 3 4 2 18 $ 2,393 $ 5o $ 2,433
2. Concept DpvPlopmenl
A. Site Plan 4 14 8 26 $ Z694 S 2.694
B Guard Building-Civil 4 4 12 20 S 1.996 f 1.996
C Well with District 4 2 2 2 10 $ 1,229 S 25 $ 1.253
D. Meeting with A 3 3 6 $ 795 S 25 S 920
Subtotal 15 2 23 20 2 62 8 6.703 f 50 S 6,753
3. Plans
A. Civil-4 slice" 8 1 56 60 6 130 $ 11.9241 S 11.924
B. Swctural/Amliitectura1-6shee" 72 40 60 172 S 18.040 S 18,040
C. Elecuical/Communications.3 sh.m 2 12 24 32 2 72 S 6.894 S 150 S 7,044
D. Mahanical-about 0.5 sheen 8 8 16 S 1,664 f 1.664
Subtotal to 92 120 160 8 J90 f MX2 S I50 $ 39,672
d crsacificallona
A. Civil 2 6 4 12 5 1146 S I,140
B. SlrucluraOArchitectunl 8 12 8 28 S 3.312 f 7,312
C Electrical 6 4 10 $ 996 f 996
D. Mechanical 4 2 6 $ 629 E 628
111602 papa 1 at Sinn,Ergh dng Cw -w
Project Budget
Plant No. 2 Entrance Orange County Sanitation District
Personnel Hours Budget
12
ai
Task Description o o
L
TFi $ z o
Submivah g $ 300 $ 300
Subtotal 10 22 6 - 18 56 $ 6,082 $ 300 E 6,382
5. Cost Estimate
A. Civil 1 8 1 10 $ 1,019 3 1,019
0. SuuctuaVArchitecluml 4 2 2 9 $ 1,120 113 1,120
C. Elecid.1 - 6 6 $ 790 $ 790
D. Umhanical 1 1 E 130 $ 1
Subtotal s 9 t0 1 25 $ 3019 $ - E 3"
a Meetings Pr ct Management, & Quality Control
A. Meetings-auume 2 additional with?people 5 4 2 II $ 1.333 $ 50 S 1,383
B. ftj t Mana emenl 10 10 $ 1,650 $ 1,650
C. Qualitycon" 8 8 $ 020 $ 1.320
D.Computer services $ $ 1,760 $ 1.760
Subtotal 23 - 4 - 2 n E 4a03 E 1,810 E 6,113
Total 1 721 128 167 Igo >1 580 S 6109E E 2,360 E 63,402
Anrouno shown are raw routs.
Personnel Caleemv &R
Pdwipal/Proj.Mg $165.00
Senior Pngineer $130.00
Engineer $100.00
Cadd $78.00
Clerical 554.00
11IM2 Pope201E Boyle 11111 a fl,Cwporelbn
�W
Draft
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, February 13, 2002, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ofthe Orange
County Sanitation District was held on February 13, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as bllows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Brian Brady, Chair Brad Hogin
Shawn Boyd, Vice Chair Steve Filarsky
Brian Donahue Don Hughes
John M. Gullixson Doug Johnson
Mark Leyes William Morgan
Roy Moore Nitim Patel
Joy L. Neugebauer Randy Fuhnnan
James W. Silva Ryal Wheeler
Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Juanita Skillman
Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT:
Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources
Mike White, Controller
Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager
Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst
Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Randy Fuhrman addressed the Committee suggesting similar action be taken wth regard to
Agenda Item No. 11(1) as was taken by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee vlth
regard to removing time limitations for Directors'comments in Section 1, paragraph E.(4)(d) and
(0
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeling L
Page 2
February 13, 2002
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the January 9, 2002
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting.
Directors Brady, Donahue, Moore and Neugebauer abstained.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager had no report.
(7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
The Director of Finance had no report.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources had no report.
19) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
The Communications Manager was not present.
(10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel had no report.
(11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To remove Agenda Item No. 11(a) from the Consent
Calendar.
a. FAHR02-09: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2002.
b. FAHR02-10: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Nbnthly Report.
C. FAHR02-11: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of January 31, 2002.
d. FAHR02-12: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation
Claims and Costs Report.
v Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meting
Page 3
February 13, 2002
f. FAHR02-14: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the Mid-Year
Financial Report for the period ending December 31, 2001.
g. FAHR02-15: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly
Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2001
through December31, 2001.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended
actions for items specified as 11(a)through (d), (I) and (g) under Consent
Calendar.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any:
e. FAHR02-13: Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Committee Business: A motion to
approve and adopt Rules of Procedure, as set forth in District Resolution
No. OCSD 01-23, as the Rules of Procedure of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee.
Directors discussed the difference in language included in Section
4(E)(4)(d)and (f)with regard to different time limitations, as wall as the
authority of the Chairperson to naive those time limits.
Motion: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve and adopt Rules
of Procedure, as set forth in District Resolution No. OCSD 01-23, as the
Rules of Procedure of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee, as amended,to include'Unless the time limit is waived by the
Chairperson"in Section 4(E)(4)(d).
(12) ACTION ITEMS
a. FAHR02-16: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-
_, Establishing a Business Mentor Program In Cooperation with the
Orangewood Children's Foundation.
Blake Anderson, General Manager, gave a brief report on the mentor
program. It was reported the program vould be for a one-year period
only, and would be assessed at that time to see ifthe program should
continue.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval
to the Board of Directors.
b. FAHR02-17: Consideration of special audit instructions for 2001-02 fiscal year
independent financial audit or forensic audit
William Morgan and Nitin Patel of Diehl, Evans & Company, LLP
spoke to the Directors regarding potential fnancial services
Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meting
Page 4
February 13, 2002
including certified audits,forensic services, limited procedures
reviews, and performance and operational audits. They suggested
a limited procedure review if there was a specific area of concern
be performed in lieu of an additional certified audit.
Director Gullixson then expressed his concerns, as well as a
desire to more fully understand current audit and accounting
practices.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to direct staff to schedule
a workshop to review accounting audits and internal accounting
practices so that the FAHR Committee mould better understand
what areas, if any, should be considered for a limited procedure
review.
C. FAHR02-18: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. 02-
Adopting Policies and Procedures for Establishing the District's Written
Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy, SAFETY-POL-101, and
Subsequent Safety Policies Named Therein.
Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager, reviewed key points contained in
the proposed establishment of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approwl
to the Board of Directors.
d. FAHR02-19: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-
, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human
Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for immediate
reinstatement of a Safety Supervisor classification at pay range El
($65,164-$92,192).
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approNal
to the Board of Directors.
(13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
a. FAHR02-20 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement re Groundwater Replenishment
System, Job No. J-36
Brad Hogin, General Counsel, gave an overview of key components of the proposed
development,operation and maintenance agreement Wth Orange County Water District
and responded to several questions by Directors.
UMinutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meting
Page 5
February 13, 2002
b. FAHR02-21 Cal-OSHA Inspection, August—December 2001
No verbal report was given regarding this item.
(14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled br March 13, 2002 at 5 p.m.
(17) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:00 p.m. pursuant to Go%emment Code Section
54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). Confdential Minutes of the Closed
Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item No.
17(a)(1).
At 7:22 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
Submitted by.
Penny M. I le
FAHR Committee Se tary
G1wp.dlaXadMWBS\FAHM021302 draft FAHR Minut .dm
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Dare TG atl.of Dir.
02/13/02 02/ V2
AGENDA REPORT Ran Number Rem Number
rAHR02-09 15(0
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael White, Controller
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2002
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of January 2002.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional
external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian
bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of
California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements
as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the
"Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The
District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of
the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase
agreements.
As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting
Report, the District is a holding a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security that
carried an acceptable credit rating at the time of purchase. Since that time, the rating
from Moody's has fallen twice, first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Also, the security
rating from Standard & Poors fell once from A-to BBB. Although these ratings are less
than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial
strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security,that the District would
suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy
does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit
standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and
Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market")as of the
last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor
variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None
G]y.OYapnCrlewOAppffi Rem Q, B WA�Reps WNMmm I5C)TR RPT dm
Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) �'
❑ This Item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term
investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of
posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield
analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,
yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual
holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the
source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may
not be reflected.
Also provided is a summary of investment balances and transactions within the State of
California Local Agency Investment Fund for the month of January 2002.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with
California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy.
Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted
expenditures for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts January 31,2002 Yield(%)
State of Calif.LAW $ 32,999,348 3.1
Union Bank Checking Account 586,778 N/A
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 4,320,000 1.1
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 42.896,367 4.8
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 351,982.935 4.6
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,836 (1)
Debt Service Reserves wlrrustees 35,294,918 4.1
Petty Cash 5.000 N/A
TOTAL $466 087 182
(1) Unavailable as of the date of this report.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
WIC
e'.M➢.dOYpxideVl�d AQt ReFab=22 rd A,. WEASRG d-
Page 2
•• 11 111 111
NMI` IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII
11111 , \\\ \\\\` \\\\` \\\\ \\��
%
1 111 111 'OOi�O, 00000 �
1/ 111 111 iO�i�iO� �OOOQi_!•�i000 ♦...�_,..../
....f
♦.•.. _�••.•._*....� ♦...♦ •...♦ i....
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i�i�i00' �OOOpi 4�'O�O ♦•••�O ♦•••� ♦•••�
1 1 1/ 1 1 1 !OOO.Q i'0�00� i�0000 i•••♦
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / !0000• i0.00�. !OO.p•, ♦•••• •.... ♦...�
.�0���'O �i�.�.�.�i !i•�.�.�.� ii�i'i'i�i �i'i'i'i'i l��i����i
eXXX*i�_����i�i�i�_��i�i
1 - 1 • 1 1 . = 1 1
•• ••
113 Debt Servioe Reserves ULAIF
I Dist 11 GO :
1 •
Orange County Sanitation District >r
Investment Transactions and Balances in the
State of California Local Agency Investment Fund
January 2002
Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yleld
Balance
January 1,2002 $29,990,470 $29,990,470 $29,990,470 3.068 3.088
Deposits:
01/03/02 2,200,000 2,200,000 2.200.000 3.068 3.068
01/23/02 14,600,000 14,600,000 14,600,000 3.068 3.068
Cluanedy
Interest
Distribution 108,878 108,878 108.878 3.068 3.068
Withdrawals:
01/09/002 (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,200,000) 3.068 3.068
01/16/02 (6,100,000) (6,100,000) (6,100,000) 3.068 3.068
01/31/02 (6,600,000) (6,600,000) (6,600,000) 3.068 3.068
Balance
January 31,2002 32,999,348 32,999,348 32,999,348 3.068 3.068
MONTHLY REPORT `
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING
(for the month ended 31 January 2002)
Page I of 2
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $43,463,340
Mellon $43,496,734
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $43,770,806
• Mellon $43,804,045
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.22
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar impact(gaintloss)of 1%Change: $95,619
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 64
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
1 Month: 0.19 0.16
3 Months: 0.63 0.54
12 Months: 4.46 3.71
Year-to-Date: 0.19 0.16
Commemay
Interest rmes a1 the short<nd of the yield curve rose during the month O3 month T-Bills up 3 basis points to 1.956/6),while longer maturities decreased(30-year Treasuries down 4 basis point to 5.43%).
114 Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 3 basis point during the month.
PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes enhanced returns.
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ended 31 January 2002)
Page 2 of 2
Compliance Issues:
None.
Split Rated Securities Still in Compliance:
$115,000 par of Daimler Chrysler NA HLDG(233835AF4) 7.125%coupon,3/l/2002 maturity,representing 0.3%of the portfolio
holdings. The secrity was downgraded on 10/31/2001 by S&P from A-to BBB+; the issue continues to carry a Moody's rating of
A3. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a
split rating.
• $85,000 par of Ford Motor Credit note(345397RS4)6.55% coupon,9/10/2002 maturity,representing 0.2%of the portfolio
holdings. The security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+; the issue now carves a Moody's rating of A3
after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/16/2002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by
S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating.
• $300,000 par General Motors Acceptance Corp security representing 0.7%of the portfolio holdings (37042 W WN7). The security
was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+; the security continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. OCSD's
guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. (An
additional GMAC issue of 500,000 par matured on 12/7/2001.450,000 par with cusip 37042WZC8 matured on 01/28/02).
w.ofmrnp moNouniwmnwr Mn'�/Q�ao-^^a.nvsea
MONTHLY REPORT ,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING
(for the month ended 31 January 2002)
Page 1 of 2
Long-Term Operating Monies(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $355,853,495
Mellon $355,539,017
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $350,110,432
• Mellon $350,108,245
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.12
Of Index: 2.36
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gamAoss)of 1%Change: $7,544,094
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 34%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAV'
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No*
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Raze of Return(%)by
Period: Portfolio Index
1 Month: 0.45 0.29
3 Months: .0.54 .0.53
12 Months: 6.51 7.73
Year-to-Date: 0.45 0.29
• Three-month yields rase for the month(90-day T-Bills up 3 basis points ro 1.75%)as did longer maturities out to five years(5-yea Treasury Notes up 7 basis points to 4.37%).
• The Long-Temp portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 16 basis points for the month
• Positioning the portfolio with below4ndex duration by PIMCO was positive for performance as yields generally rose across most maturities.
• A greater than benchmark emphasis on short and long maturity instruments,relative to their imemsediste counterparts,was a slight positive for performance as intemmdiate yields rose the most.
• As Treasuries lagged the broader market an underweight allocation was positive.
• Holdings of mortgage-backed securities added strongly to returns as the season,benefited from a more stable mower me environment during the month.
An underweight allocation on the corporate sector deurrewd two roms as investor expectations ofeeorm ire mic recovery,coupled with a des for higheryielding asset em s,led to strong perform nce ofpomte
bonds.
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVEST MENT MANAGEMENT PROGRf M
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING
(for the month ended 3/January 2002)
Page 2 of 2
*Compliance lssues:
S1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317130),6.83 1%coupon,9/12008 maturity,representing 0.4%of the portfolio
holdings. The security was purchased on 8/102001;it was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (on 9/10001)and S&P from A-to
BBB(on 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAI to BA3 on 12212001. The District's investment policy requires a
minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A.by S&P at the time of purchase.
With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed. In their opinion,the spread,collateral,and issuer liquidity
all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for thew recommendation:
•foremost,PIMCO doesn't believe that UAL is going bankrupt. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to
survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and we believe that the company(and the industry)will
survive.
•secondly,the collateral is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60-75r/a etc.).
•PIMCO believes liquidation values,even under the most onerous assumptions,are much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current
pricing levels overstate the risks.
•If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available(67.15 per IDQ),the portfolio would realist a loss of$525,600(approximately 15 basis
points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently
reflected in the market. This is a conservative loss estimate.
PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion
of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action.
Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance:
•$6,000,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(17120QE8 and 233835AM9)representing 1.7%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were
downgraded on 10/312001 by S&P from A-to BBB+;the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3. OCSDes guidelines require a minimum rating
of A3 by Mooches or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating.
•$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397S13,345397SR5)representing 2.6%of the portfolio holdings. The
securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a fritter downgrade(from
A2)on 11162002. IKSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split
rating.
•$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042WE80,37042WZK0)representing 3.3%of the portfolio holdings.
The securities were downgraded on (0/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities continue to carry a Moody's rating of A2. OCSD's guidelines
require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating.
....._4-%nwv20lwhee1Tnasury Mgaa1L- 0800Jan02.RPLdoc
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 31-JAN-2002 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,371,161.46 6,371,161.46 14.65% 0.00
U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THN IYR 99,921.88 99,984.00 0.23% 62.12
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 3,461,200.90 3,461,200.90 7.96% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 2,989,731.37 2,989,731.37 6.87% 0.00
OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 99,760.00 99,760.00 0.23% 0.00
MUTUALFUNDS 3,355,182.25 3,355,182.25 7.71% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 16,376,937.86 16,377,019.98 37.65% 62.12
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �,376� 16,377,019.98 37.65% 62.12
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 5,528,846.75 5,499,738.00 12.64% -29,108.75
U.S.AGENCIES 8,459,933.72 8,360,673.80 19,22% -99,259.92
BANKING&FINANCE 8,244,163.80 8,127,611.96 18.69% 116,551.84
INDUSTRIAL 1,850,424.00 1,827,019.90 4.20°A -23,404.10
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,970,124.40 1,936,663.20 4.45% -33,461.20
UTILITY-GAS 773,227.50 767,640.00 1.76% -5,587.50
TOTAL UNITED STATES 26,826,720.17 26,519,346.86 60.97% -307,373.31
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 26,826,720.17 �26,519,3 .99 -307,37 Jl
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 600,367.01 600,367.01 1.38% 0.00
TOTAL 600,367.01 600,367.01 1.38% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 600,367.01 600,367.01 138% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 43,804,045.04 43,496,733.85 100.001/6 -307,311.19
12-Feb-2001 11:54:57 &ecufWe Wwkbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 31-JAN-2002 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
RECEIVABLES 69,279.50 69,279.50 0.02% 0.00
PAYABLE$ -36,163,343.75 -36,163,343.75 -10.17% 0.00
TOTAL -36,094,064.25 -36,094,064.25 -10.15% 0.00
UNITED STATES
MUTUAL FUNDS 62,663,421.23 62,663,421.23 17.62% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 62,663,421.23 62,663,421.23 17.62% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 2 9—JUM 26,564,33336 7A5$ 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 85,009,587.99 85,123,891.11 23.94% 114,303.12
INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,284,128.70 32,481,163.39 9.14% 3,197,034.69
U.S.AGENCIES 43,681,906.01 44,905,342.98 12.60% 1,123,536.07
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 31,743,590.08 32,090,963.17 9,03% 342,373.09
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 9,48Z199.53 9,658,966.63 2.44% 176,767.10
FHLMC POOLS 3,596,115.33 3,593,122.56 1.01% .2,993.27
FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,028,314.19 4,083,093.34 1.15% 54,769.16
FNMA POOLS 9,690,625.00 9,920,312.50 2.76% 129,687.50
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 5,566,998.31 5,133,296.16 1.44% 433,712.15
ABS:CAR LOAN 513,906.25 512,810.00 0.14% .1,0%.25
BANKING&FINANCE 40,974,863.80 41,388,189.24 11.61% 313,325.44
INDUSTRIAL 27,986,405.00 28,125,712.00 7.91% 139,307.00
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,62ZOI0.00 14,841,565.00 4.17% 219,555.00
UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,301,095.00 2.05% 1,095.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,554,075.00 2.12% 56,820.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 319,982,805.69 325,413,579.09 91.53% 5,430,772.40
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ------yff3, $ 25,413,57 . 8 -------Ff.3m
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
12-Feb-2002 11:35::58 EmcotAw Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ PAGE.. 1
BASE' USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSFV7522202 31JAN-2002 FINAL
LONG TERMOPER-PLMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO D19MBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,556,081.95 3,556,091.95 1.00% 0.00
TOTAL 3,556,081.95 3,556,081.95 1.00% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,556,081.95 3,556,081.95 1dw 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS J50,108,244.61 355,539,01TO1 100.00% 5,430,772.40
11-Feb-2001 Il:55:58 F ecwm Wjrkb.ch.
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
MOF07511102 2002/01/31 RUN DAYS t 02/06/02
DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM t 10.40.21
PAR VALUE -YTM AT CORAENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD S-P PRICE MUST VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ----------
CAR 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS
100,000.00 STUDENT LR HARRETING ABBE .000 1.809 P-1 99.994 99,921.88 .61
86383TSE7 VAR RT 06/20/2002 DD 12/20/01 A-1+ 99,984.00 .23
3,355,192.25 DREYPUS TREASDRY CUR MGMT .000 1.905 AAA 100.000 3,355,182.25 20.49
996005247 AAA 3,355,192.25 9.02
500,000.00 BRAFT FOODS INC DISC 1.201 .000 99.924 499,622.22 3.05
5007RIB77 02/07/2002 499,622.22 1.16
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL MAN CA SB CONS SYSTEM 1.211 .000 P-1 99.924 2,499,100.00 15.25
313313=2 NAT 02/15/2002 A-1+ 2,490,100.00 5.82
1,000,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL MT0 ABBE DISCOUNT 1.732 .000 P-1 99.865 958,654.43 6.09
313589TR4 MAT 02/28/2002 A-1+ 998,654.43 2.33
1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 1.753 .000 P-1 99.030 1,457,447.91 9.14
63743DBV 02/27/2002 1,497,447.91 3.49
857,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN NTH CORD DISC 1.262 .000 P-1 99.628 053,815.77 5.21
313397UF6 MAT 03/14/2001 A-1+ 853,615.29 1.99
2,000,000.00 FED9MI, NAIL NTG MEN DISCOUNT 1.233 .000 P-1 99.554 1,991,076.94 12.15
313589UV3 HAT 03/28/2002 A-1+ 1,991,076.94 4.64
1,500,000.00 AMERICAN BE CR CP DISC 1.298 .000 99.552 1,493,207.50 9.11
02581SDR9 04/25/2002 1,493,297.50 3.49
100,000.00 STUDENT LN RABBETING USE DISC 1.004 .000 P-1 99.260 99,760.00 .60
B63B33TB1 MAT 02/14/2002 A-1+ 99,760.00 .23
1,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 1.823 .000 P-1 99.500 1,692,866.61 10.33
36959JCL5 03/20/2002 1,692,866.61 3.95
55,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MSG COST DISC 1.B63 .000 P-1 99.311 54,621.26 .33
313397VE1 MAT 04/25/2002 A-1+ 54,621.26 .13
15,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTO CORE DISC 2.116 .000 P-1 99.259 14,980.87 .09
313392UP4 MAT 03/22/2002 A-1+ 14,900.07 .03
1,000,000.00 HECTOR DICBIN80N DISC 2.110 .000 P-1 99.131 991,300.33 6.05
095888DR1 04/25/2002 991,300.33 2.31
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 2
OCSF00511102 2002/01/31 RUN DATE ! 02/06/02
DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIES 10.40.21
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HARRRT VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ____--____
40,000.00 FEDERAL FARM BR CONS SYSTEMMIC 2.263 .000 P-1 99.438 39,775.00 .24
313313M MAT 02/28/2001 A-1+ 39,005.00 .09
200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 3.336 .000 P-1 98.314 196,628.09 1.20
03588SCB0 03/11/2002 196,629.89 .46
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1.234 .502 16,376,957.06 100.00
16,300,019.98 38.16
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
900,000.00 STUDENT IN NARRETING ASSN .000 2.019 AAA 100.000 899,859.38 3.39
063677036 VAR AT 03/21/2002 DD 09/20/01 AAA 900,000.00 2.10
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL SAIL MTG ASSN ME 1.640 6.513 AAA 101.187 3,458,379.00 12.93
31364CN79 6.590% 05/21/2002 DD 05/21/97 AAA 3,440,350.00 8.02
1,245,000.00 FEDERAL SAIL HTG ASSN HIS 1.060 6.458 AAA 100.500 1,257,130.75 4.01
31364CZH4 6.490E D3/19/2002 DD 03/19/97 AAA 1,251,225.00 2.92
30,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN HER CONS BD 1.949 5.60E AAA 100.922 30,409.80 .11
3133HOWS 5.660E 05/21/2002 DD 05/21/99 AAA 30,276.60 .00
50,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BX CONS ADS 1.963 5.050 AAA 101.391 50F834.50 .I9
3133MBXL3 5.030% 06/14/2002 DD 06/14/99 AAA 50,695.50 .12
2,000,000.00 U S TRINVS1 My NOTES 2.051 5.504 AAA 102.969 2,070,468.75 7.76
912827303 05.350E 11/30/2002 DD 11/30/97 AAA 2,059,300.00 4.00
200,000.00 PED FARM CA BE CONS SYS HIS 2.118 4.754 AAA 101.391 203,994.00 .06
31331R044 4.820E 10/07/2002 DD 10/07/90 AAA 202,782.00 .43
200,000.00 M AGILL LYNCH&CO HIS 4TR 00012 2.234 3.102 AA3 102.000 205,912.00 .76
59018YAM3 3.250E 07/26/2002 DD 07/26/00 AA- 204,154.00 .48
900,000.00 VIRGINIA ELSC 6 FM 1ST 6 REF 2.329 7.243 A2 101.817 927,981.00 3.45
927004CD4 2.305E 07/01/2002 DD 07/14/92 _ A 916,353.00 2.14
25,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSN MTN 2.529 6.610 AAA 101.359 25,647.25 .09
31364CQ92 6.000% 06/04/2002 DD 06/04/97 AAA 25,339.75 .06
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSFO7511302 2002/01/31 RON DATE 02/06/02
DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RON TINE 1 10.40.21
PAR VALUE 'YIN AT CURRENT MOODY M URRY TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUB 6 TOTAL
--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ _-__--_--_
50,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BS CONS BDS 2.567 6.178 AAA 100.516 50,713.00 .10
3133R9U67 6.210% 03/15/2002 DO 09/15/99 AAA 50,258.00 .12
50,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BUN CONS BOB 2.578 6.233 AAA 101.000 50,932.50 .19
3133NA2Y1 6.295% 04/25/2002 DO 10/25/99 AAA 50,500.00 .12
25,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN US CONS BD 2.338 5.307 AAA 100.422 25,292.75 .09
3133MBCL6 5.410% 03/26/2002 DO 03/26/99 AAA 25,105.50 .06
20,000.00 P9DERAL ROM LN RS CONS BDS 2.726 5.4D8 AAA 100.701 20,302.40 .OD
3133NBRB2 5.450% 05/10/2002 DO 05/10/99 AAA 20,156.20 .05
20,000.00 FEDERAL R0M LN RIG CORP DUB 2.730 6.771 AAA 100.875 20,402.20 .OY
3134A17E0 6.830% 04/16/2002 DO 04/16/97 AAA 20,175.00 .05
25,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE CONS BUN 2.732 6.369 AAA 100.840 25,460.00 .09
3133MOSXS 6.625% 04/04/2002 DO 04/04/97 AAA 25,220.00 .06
555,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN COUP NT 2.765 6.609 A2 201.381 560,475.40 2.12
441812PN9 6.700% 06/15/2002 DO 06/08/95 A 562,664.55 1.31
35,000.00 FEDERAL R0M LN USE CONS BD 2.375 6.537 AAA 100.047 35,388.28 .13
323395LY9 6.540% 02/05/2002 DD 02/05/97 ARE 35,016.45 .08
200,000.00 MAY, MART BTDRBB INC HT 3.159 6.964 MY 101.639 206,194.00 .76
931142BG7 6.875% 08/01/2002 DD O0/01/00 AA 203,270.00 .47
145,000.00 DONALDSON LUPEIN JERRETT 3.162 5.844 AA 100.535 147,009.70 .54
257663AR1 5.875% 04/01/2002 ON 03/23/99 A- 145,775.75 .34
325,000.00 AMERICAN GEN PIN HIS ITS 00324 3.278 6.453 Al 101.504 333,050.25 1.24
02635PFM9 6.550% 06/24/2002 DD O6/24/99 A+ 329,BBB.00 .37
575,000.00 PHILIP MORRIB COS NT 3.342 6.966 A2 202.283 592,927.30 2.21
718154WR 7.125% OB/15/2002 DD 08/15/92 A- 588,127.25 1.30
115,000.DO DASRLERCURYSLER NA HIM COUP 3.503 D.l OI A3 100.250 116,769.85 .43
233835AF4 7.125% 03/01/2002 DO 03/15/00 A- 115,287.50 .27
500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE CONS NOS 3.638 4.400 ARE 100.455 502,690.00 1.09
3133ME6R7 4.500% 04/04/2002 DO 04/04/01 AAA 502,225.00 1.17
20,000.00 NIAGARA MUM PER COUP ST 3.723 5.785 BAA2 101.551 20,293.40 .0I
653522CQ3 5.875% 09/01/2002 DO 01/01/14 A+ 20,310.20 .05
MDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4
MSF07511102 2002/01/31 RUN DATE 02/06/02
DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RON TIM t 10.40.21
PAR VALUE -YIN AT CURRENT MOODY BAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE BASKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ ------- ------- _______ ________ ____________ __________
1,1U0,000.00 FIRST ON CORP SUB HT 3.801 3.940 A2 102.325 1,139,714.00 4.24
333358AB2 8.125% 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/92 A- 1,125,535.00 2.62
605,000.00 CIT GROUP BLOCS INC 3.806 6.300 A2 101.189 619,520.00 2.30
125569DPS 6.375% 08/01/2002 DD 07/20/97 A+ 612,193.45 1.43
200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIG ASSN STN 3.009 6.133 BAD 101.750 204,608.00 .36
31364C3N6 6.240E 07/29/2002 DD 07/29/97 AAA 203,500.00 .47
600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS SIR 1 W00405 3.853 5.660 A2 101.583 610,968.00 2.29
013928SS4 5.350% 00/12/2002 DD 02/12/01 A 609,498.00 1.42
165,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN HITTER 4.042 6.258 M3 101.064 268,652.05 .63
611446CQO 6.375% 08/01/2002 DD 07/28/97 M- 166,075.60 .39
4,200,000.00 FEDERAL BONE IN BR CONS BPS 4.246 6.350 AM 100.000 4,278,414.00 15.83
3133NRQ31 6.750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 4,200,000.00 9.79
20,000.00 FEDERAL GORE IN BE CONS BDS 4.273 5.049 AAA 101.229 20,272.60 .03
3133M9386 5.920% 06/14/2002 DO 06/14/99 AM 20,243.80 .05
1,180,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO SOB AT 4.205 8.234 M3 101.711 1,224,286.70 4.52
949740WS 8.3751 05/15/2002 DD 05/26/92 A 1,200,289.80 2.80
500,000.00 BANK ONE CORP SUB 4.300 0.065 Al 100.438 514,200.00 1.89
06423AAA1 8.100E 03/01/2002 DO 03/01/92 A- 502,190.00 1.17
85,000.00 FORD ME CR CO HIS 4.319 6.457 A3 101.443 06,759.30 .32
345397RS4 6.55U4 09/10/2002 DD 09/10/97 BBB+ 86,226.55 .20
1,200,000.00 GOLDEN NEST FIRE, CORP DBE, BOB 4.332 8.277 A2 101.187 1,237,614.00 4.57
381311AF3 8.3751 04/15/2002 DD 04/30/92 A- 1,214,244.00 2.83
60,000.00 CRABS NANBATTAN CORP NEW SOB 4.389 8.500 Al 101.466 61,645.80 .22
16163ABE7 0.625% 05/01/2002 DD 05/01/92 A+ 60,979.60 .14
750,000.00 PUBLIC SW ELEC GAS ITS 00000 4.399 7.025 A3 102.352 I73,227.50 2.E9
74456QAB9 9.900A 09/06/2002 DD 09/06/00 A- 767,640.00 1.39
51,000.00 MERIDIAN BANCORP INC SUB DEB 4.410 3.679 A2 102.546 52,596.30 .19
5895BOAB5 3.075% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/92 A- 52,298.46 .12
675,000.00 RAMAN RICA CORP SEE NT 4.424 0.318 M3 100.682 697,018.50 2.56
066050S07 8.375% 03/15/2002 A 679,603.50 1.50
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I 5
O SF07511102 2002/01/31 RIM DATE 102/06/02
DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 110.40.21
PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY ERNXBT TOTAL COST/ B TYPE
53CMIW ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD S-P PRICE MARBET VALUE 8 TOTAL
1,000,000.00 TEXAS UTILS ELEC CO 1ST HIS 4.480 9.125 A3 100.000 1,021,050.00 3.31
882050BF6 8.1258 02/01/2002 DBB+ 1,000,000.00 2.33
155,000.00 BANE ONE CORP HT 4.527 6.208 AA3 101.944 157,043.75 .59
06423AAC7 6.400% O0/01/2002 DD 07/22/99 A 158,013.20 .37
247,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA RAN CONS DSBB 4.670 5.200 AAA 100.000 246,044.81 .93
31331LAF5 5.200% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/01 AAA 247,000.00 .58
1,015,000.00 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC COMP HT 4.673 9.208 A3 102.031 1,051,302.70 3.90
960402APO B.3758 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/92 A- 1,035,614.65 2.41
200,000.00 PEDENAL NAIL RIG ASSN DEB 4.840 3.489 AAA 100.141 204,660.00 .35
3135863E7 7.500% 02/11/2002 DO 2/10/92 ARA 200,282.00 .47
150,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN BE CONS BOB 4.840 6.900 AAA 100.32E 152,959.50 .56
3133MATE9 78 02/25/2002 DD 02/25/2000 AAA 150,492.00 .35
150,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN ME 4.840 6.284 AAA 100.094 151,902.00 .56
31364CMB 6.290% 02/11/2002 DD 02/11/97 AAA 150,141.00 .35
300,000.DO GNAC SIR 5.199 5.893 A2 100.205 302,149.00 1.13
33042NMN7 5.9108 03/lt/2002 DD 03/10/99 A 300,855.00 .70
________ _______ _________________ __----__-
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2.593 6.318 26,826,720.17 100.00
26,519,346.86 61.03
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL 2.324 5.179 43,203,678.03 100.00
42,B96.366.84 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
MBF07522202 2002/01/31 RUN DATE 02/06/02
DISTRICT' LONG-TERN OPERATING HER TINE 10.40.21
PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIRLD S-P PRICE RABBET VALUE 9 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASE A CASS EQUIVALENTS
62,663,421.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NEST .000 1.905 AAA 100.000 62,663,421.23 100.00
996085247 AAA 62,663,421.23 16.15
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASE EQUIVALENTS .000 1.905 62,663,421.23 100.00
$2,663,421.23 16.15
FIRED INCOIMt SECURITIES
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PER FNMA SF SEE .000 6.110 AAA 90.203 9,690,625.00 3.01
OIF060626 6.000% 02/01/2032 DD 02/01/02 AAA 9,e20,312.50 2.53
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR. GERA I SF HER .000 6.442 AAA 100.906 10,470,468.75 3.25
O1HO62623 6.500% 02/15/2032 DO 02/15/02 AAA 10,595,130.00 2.33
14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PER GNNA BF STU .000 0.583 AAA 105.438 14,756,875.00 4.53
OIN0O0625 8.000% 02/15/2032 DD 02/15/01 AAA 14,761,320.00 3.80
7,500,000.00 ARMORER BUSCH COB INC HE .000 6.653 Al 1D1.459 7,646,250.00 2.33
035229AY9 6.3501 06/01/2005 OD 06/05/95 Aa 7,609,425.00 1.96
900,000.00 BEM HERMES STE 4 TR 00459 .000 2.389 A2 100.046 899,406.00 .27
013928VC4 MEG RT 12/01/2DO3 DD 08/17/01 A 900,414.00 .23
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PER USSR II .TUNBOS .000 7.221 AAA 103.859 1,245,315.00 .38
218072627 7.500% 02/20/2032 DO 02/01/01 AAA 1,246,312.56 .32
4,500,000.00 RAINIER CHRYSIER NA CORP NT .000 2.646 A3 99.365 4,491,345.00 1.33
233835AN9 MEG RT 12/16/2002 DO 12/15/00 AI 4,489,425.00 1.16
950,000.00 DISTRIBUTION PIM 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.635 102.904 969,090.93 .30
25415MAD6 5.940% 10/15/2011 DO 03/18/99 911,580.00 .2S
524,112.57 PRIM GROUP 104-0353 .000 7.334 AM 102.270 538,055.87 .16
312BDBHA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/59 AAA 536,604.91 .14
1,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM6 IN BE CONS BUS .000 6.503 AM 108.406 7,997,625.00 2.49
3133HAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/00/00 AAA 8,130,450.OD 2.10
175,310.20 PRICC GROUP 418-6064 .000 6.261 AAA 101.686 271,037.03 .OS
31348SRE3 6.384% 01/01/2020 DD 12/01/97 AM 179,269.44 .05
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s Y
OCSF01522102 2002/01/31 RUN DATE f 02/06/02
DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME f 10.40.21
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOIRL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ ____________________________ _______ _______ _______ -------- ------------ ________-_
11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG MEN DEW .000 5.145 AAA 102.047 11,521,271.50 3.55
31359WX2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 11,582,334.50 2.98
715,642.65 SERA II POOL 40000395 .000 5.424 AAA 101.406 309,157.14 .22
36225CMM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 725,704.59 .29
6,141,330.21 GNMA II POOL 4080408X .000 5.424 AAA 1D1.406 6,079,353.26 1.91
36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 6,228,082.94 1.6D
4,000,000.00 aMBEAL MERE ACCEP HIS 100615 .000 2.252 A2 98.156 3,998,440.00 1.20
37042NESO FLTG RT 08/04/2003 DD OS/D3/D1 EBB+ 3,926,240.00 1.01
41000,000.00 NABISCO INC HIS .000 5.995 A2 102.174 4,081,440.OD 1.25
629527CA8 VAR RT 02/01/2033 DD 01/22/99 A 4,086,960.00 1.05
5,000,000.00 PEILIP MORRIS COS INC RES .000 0.047 A2 106.429 5,263,000.00 1.63
718154CHO 7.500% 04/02/2004 DD 04/01/97 A- 5,321,450.00 1.37
5DO,000.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.269 AAA 102.562 513,906.25 .15
7404GRFN6 6.430% 03/08/2004 DD 06/21/99 512,810.00 .13
4,130,525.49 SEA DID DEV EARTH 20DI-20C 1 .DOO 6.238 AAA 101.640 4,130,525.19 1.29
83162CWO 6.3401 03/01/2021 AAA 4,190,266.11 1.08
2,997,107.68 SBA SET) EARTH CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.415 AAA 103.510 2,997,107.68 .95
831641DD4 6.640% 02/1D/2011 DD 02/21/01 3,102,306.16 .80
1,600,000.00 UNITED AISLE RAMMED 01-1 C .000 10.376 SAX 65.837 1,60D,000.DO .32
9093118C2 6.8318 09/01/2009 DD 08/22/01 A- 1,053,392.00 .27
6,166,089.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.754 AAA 103.219 6,285,473.02 1.95
9128204Y5 3.8751 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99 AAA 6,364,575.40 1.64
04,500,OOD.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 6.214 AAA 108.625 60,679,062.50 24.96
9128276D9 06.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/15/00 AAA 80,925,625.00 20.95
3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA MC A PNR 01 HER A .000 5.682 A3 101.197 3,487,680.00 1.08
9270042YO 5.050% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 A- 3,541,995.00 .91
25,754,480.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.810 3.320 AAA 101.406 22,999,655.68 8.02
9129212K3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 26,116,580.99 6.73
1,935,178.00 SAI/3MON SNITS BARNEY WAGS INY 4.702 3.649 RAJ. 100.022 1,794,854.30 .59
39549BWI 3.650% 02/14/2002 DO 02/14/97 A 1,935,603.74 .50
YLDAHAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 8
OCBF07522202 2002/01/31 RON DATE 02/06/02
DISTRICTS LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.40.21
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY NAKKBT TOTAL COST/ E TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE BREEZY VALUE 6 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NTH 5.261 6.313 A3 103.593 1,430,920.00 .44
8124000N6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 A- 1,450,302.00 .30
3,950,000.00 GHAC HIS 5.352 2.232 A2 98.583 3,916,768.50 1.19
3I0425QV5 VAR RT 08/10/2003 DD 08/17/98 A 3,894,028.50 1.00
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP EYE 5.849 6.509 A3 101.859 3,073,170.00 .93
01240QJAI 6.630% 03/09/2D02 DD 07/09/97 A- 3,055,II0.00 .79
2,000,000.00 RRMER5 TR BY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.601 2.126 Al 99.555 11992,800.00 .61
066365DH4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 AA- 1,991,100.00 .51
15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIG MEN DEBS 5.963 6.562 AAA 108.578 16,154,410.00 5.17
31359NFH1 7.1258 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 16,829,590.00 4.34
7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECONNUNICATIONS 6.010 5.957 AA2 100.721 3,49I,255.00 2.32
O79867AXS VAR RT 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/90 AAA 7,554,075.00 1.95
3,000,000.00 BALTINORE GAS 6 BLEC CO 5.011 6.567 A2 102.I81 3,038,250.00 .94
059165DN3 6.350E 12/15/2002 DD 12/20/00 A+ 3,U83,430.00 .09
1,500,000.00 CERYSLER FINL LLC HIS 4TROO615 6.154 1.892 A3 99.453 1,499,415.00 .45
171200EBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 A 1,491,I95.00 .38
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 6.271 1.92E Al 100.079 2,994,300.00 .92
209111CU5 VAR RT O6/25/2002 DD 06/20/97 A+ 3,002,370.00 .37
3,800,000.00 GENERAL HIM ACCEP 4TR 00562 6.303 2.212 A2 98.765 3,793,958,00 1.15
37042NEKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/00 BBB+ 3,I53,0I0.00 .9I
2,025,211.50 FHLNC NULTICLASS CTF B3 A 6.316 5.711 AAA 99.095 2,027,426.10 .61
3133TCE95 VAR RT O8/15/2032 AAA 2,006,883.34 .52
1,702,89IA3 GNNA GIN REHIC TR 2000-9 IN 6.320 2.230 AAA 100.490 1,702,897.73 .52
3831H4NA9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,711,241.93 .44
2,D00,00O.OD BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.514 A2 103.616 2,031,960.00 .63
O73902MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 2,072,360.00 .53
3,000,000.OD FORD HTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDNARH 6.350 2.101 A3 90.062 3,000,000.00 .90
345317SR5 YLTG RT 03/17/2003 DD 03/11/00 A 2,941,960.00 .76
2,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL SIR 6.351 2.179 A3 98.250 1,992,500.00 .60
345390RV0 FLIG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,965,U00.00 .51
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9
OCSF07522201 2002/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/02
DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.40.21
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY NARRET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARXBT VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ _________
21,706.33 GNNA POOL 00500917 6.389 6.091 AAA 9B.500 20,604.06 .00
36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 21,380.74 .01
67,116.09 GNNA POOL 80506636 6.399 6.091 AAA 98.500 63,707.04 .02
36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 66,109.34 .02
857,459.22 GUM POOL #0503388 6.389 6.091 AAA 98.500 913,916.38 .25
3621OWSS 6.ODOB 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 844,593.33 .22
25,998.99 GNNA POOL #0499153 6.389 6.091 AAA 98.500 24,678.72 .00
3621000E5 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 25,609.01 .01
9,603.03 GNNA POOL #0496294 6.390 6.066 AAA 98.906 9,115.38 .00
3621OW51 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 9,497.97 .00
838,298.09 GUNA POOL #0496461 6.390 6.066 AAA 98.906 ]95.]28.24 .25
3621OWM4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 829,127.10 .21
234,586.39 GNNA POOL #0491103 6.390 6.066 AAA 98.906 222,674.10 .02
36230PRY4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 232,020.41 .06
20,589.03 GNNA POOL #0486720 6.390 6.066 AAA 98,906 19,543.49 .00
36210AVN6 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 22/01/90 AAA 20,363.79 .01
41,261.28 GMA. POOL #0497343 6.390 6.066 AAA 98.906 39,165.99 .01
36210NP45 6.0004 12/25/2020 DO 12/01/98 AAA 40,809.90 .01
41,682.57 GRNA POOL #0469688 6.391 6.004 AAA 98.625 39,565.80 .01
36209EMB 6.000% 11/15/2020 DO 11/01/98 AAA 41,109.43 .01
51,579.46 GNNA POOL #0467279 6.391 6.066 AAA 98.906 48,960.20 .01
36209CCQ'I 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10101191 AAA 51,015.19 .01
77,185.83 GNNA POOL #0457814 6.391 6.084 AAA 98.625 73,266.24 .02
36208QS83 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 36,124.52 .02
689,464.68 GNNA POOL #0467286 6.391 6.066 AAA 98.906 654,452.81 .20
36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 661,921.94 .18
929,198.76 GNNA POOL #0465555 6.392 6.094 AAA 98.625 797,091.01 .25
36209AB48 6.000% 09/15/2029 DO 09/01/98 AAA 917,797.29 .21
32,475.71 GNNA POOL #0483452 6.392 6.066 AAA 98.906 30,826.54 .00
36209NBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 32,120.43 .01
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PADS 30
MSF00522202 2002/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/02
DISTRICTS TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIWB 10.40.21
PM VALUE YTR AT CURRENT NOOUY NAREET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE HARNET VALUE 8 TOTAL
_____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________
851,301.73 WHA POOL /0465546 6.392 6.084 AAA 98.625 808,071.56 .25
36209AET3 6.000% 09/15/2020 DD 08101198 AM 839,596.33 .22
798,326.43 DENA POOL #0460339 6.392 6.066 AAA 98.906 740,284.75 .23
36209DE00 6.000% 08/15/2020 DD 0810119E AAA 379,692.25 .20
41,342.70 GNNA POOL /0430057 6.393 6.066 AAA 90.906 39,243.35 .01
36203PTN9 6.0008 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 40,890.49 .01
38,952.79 GRNA PDOL /0468330 6.393 6.084 AAA 90.625 36,974.71 .01
36209DRP4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 38,417.19 .01
2,000,000.00 F0101C NULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.261 AAA 103.810 2,000,888.00 .63
3133TDPV2 6.SOOB 09/25/2018 AM 2,076,200.00 .53
2,690,035.28 PRLNC NULTICLASS CTF BEE 16208 6.499 6.366 AAA 94.243 2,533,895.34 .17
3133T13A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 2,535,179.10 .65
1,000,000.00 BAINWON 68 MINDS ME 6.625 2.057 M1 100.125 11000,000.00 .30
7954VERES VM RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/28/00 M- 1,001,250.00 .26
2,042,607.19 FRLNC GROUP IGS-0416 6.629 6.914 AAA 101.251 2,007,022.93 .00
312ODDOSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/90 AAA 2,870,168.21 .34
1,008,864.7D GNNA II POOL 1080080N 6.705 6.223 AAA 102.438 1,030,933.62 .31
36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 1,033,460.02 .27
2,OOO,OOO.00 NAEM 6 NCLENNM COB INC SR HT 6.717 6.273 Al 105.619 1,992,280.00 .64
53114BM8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 M- 2,112,380.00 .54
3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL LANINARN 6.739 6.560 A3 102.019 2,995,080.00 .94
345393853 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BB94 3,060,570.00 .79
2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE EONS LNB INC HT 6.066 6.497 A3 105.428 2,498,400.00 .80
22237UMB 6.950% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,635,700.00 .68
7,300,000.00 OMON INC NEW M 6.960 2.450 A2 100.015 7,300,000.00 2.24
682680Al2 MIG RT 04/24/2002 DD 04/24/00 A 7,301,095.00 1.08
651,951.45 GNNA II POOL #0080023 6.992 7.401 AAA 103.031 662,755.51 .20
36225CAB9 VM RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 671,718.29 .17
7,000,000.00 OLD SENT BE ME SS 00001 7.OB4 2.616 AA3 99.181 7,000,OOO.00 2.14
63982EM6 VM RT 12/01/2005 DD 04/20/00 A+ 6,984,610.00 1.80
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 11
MSF07522202 2002/01/31 RON DATE t 02/06/02
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.40.21
PAN VALUE YTM AT CONSENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE MASXHT VALUE 8 TOTAL
2,100,000.00 FEDEEAL NAIL NTG AS= DEW 7.113 6.102 AAA 107.172 2,030,133.00 .69
31359M8YS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,250,612.00 .58
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 0.512 0.107 EAA3 101.152 2,151,250.00 .62
542672CV 0.200% D3/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 A- 2,023,040.00 .52
812,004.77 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP PRA 495-7 7.564 7.416 AAA 100.188 800,141.07 .24
39810/AE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/0D AAA 813,527.28 .21
1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO HT 7.582 6.719 A3 100.464 965,170.00 .30
345397GV9 6.950% 05/15/2005 MR. 1,004,640.00 .26
962,332.22 WEVIBUNTDON PAIGE ODOO-11150 3.684 7.578 AAA 98.969 941,431.57 .29
3D2998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 952,408.17 .25
3,OOD,DDO.00 PACIFICORP 6ECD RTN 6YR 00115 1.709 6.963 A2 106.361 2,950,530.00 .98
69512HHU5 7.3001 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,190,830.00 .82
1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 7.204 Al 100.118 1,594,032.00 .53
020002AL5 7.8750 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,029,008.00 .45
-------- --- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1.517 5.612 319,902,005.69 100.00
325,413,578.00 03.64
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 1.511 5.558 382,646,226.91 300.00
388,O76,999.31 300.00
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
1CSGo0010000 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
7CSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2002 -0.34
996085247 02-Ian-2002 0.34
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2002 -0.34
996085247 02.Jan-2002 0.00
FC 02-Inn-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
60,150.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Ian-2002 -60,150.04
996085247 02-fen-2002 60,150.04
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
60,150.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2002 -60,150.04
996085247 02-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 024an-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
88,66261 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Jan-2002 -99,662.61
9196085247 04-Jan-2002 88,662.61
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
98,662.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04.3an.2002 -88,662.61
996085247 04-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 04-Jan-2002 0.00
Fsecwm Wwkbewh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE'
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,679.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Jan-2002 -2,679.17
9MS5247 08-Jon-2002 2,679.17
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,679.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Jan-2002 -2,679.17
996095247 08-Jan-2002 0.00
FC - 08-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
102,497.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Jem2002 -102,497.50
996085247 08-Jon-2002 102.497.50
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
102,49T50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Jon-2002 -102,497.50
996085247 08-Jon-2002 0.00
PC 08-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,673.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-hn-2002 -6,673.93
9%085247 09-Jon-2002 6,673.93
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,673.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-ten-2002 -6,673.93
996085247 094en-2002 0.00
FC 09-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,071,690.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Jan-2002 -5,071,690.87
996085247 15-Jee-2002 5,071,690.97
B 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Etemfjw Workkneh
IF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- • 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,071,690.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Jm-2002 -5,071,690.87
996085247 15-Jm-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
171,064.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Jan-2002 -171,064.43
996095247 16-Ian-2002 171,064.43
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
171,064.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16.Jm-2002 -171,064.43
996085247 16-Jm-2002 0.00
FC 16-ten-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
096,041.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Ian-2002 -1,396,041.83
996085247 17-Jan-2002 1,396,041.83
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,396,041.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jan-2002 -1,396,041.83
996085247 17-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 17-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jan-2002 -4.50
996095247 17-1m-2002 4.50
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Im-2002 4.50
996085247 17-1m-2002 0.00
FC 17-Im.2002 0.00
I;7.1n Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002 -31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,091.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Jan-2002 -25,091.67
996085247 18-Jan-2002 25,091.67
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,091.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 18-Jan-2002 -25,091.67
996085247 18-Ian-2002 0.00
PC 18-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC I8Jam2002 -499,908.33
26055BAN4 01222002 18-Ian-2002 499,908.33
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 18-Jan-2002 499,908.33
260550AN4 01/222002 18-Jan-2002 0.00
PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 18-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC I8-Jan-2002 499,622.22
5007MIB77 02/072002 22-Jan-2002 499,622.22
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 184an-2002 -499,622.22
5007MID77 02/07/2002 224nn-2002 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Ian-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
102,815.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Ian-2002 -102,815.28
9%085247 22-Jan-2002 102,815.28
B 0.00
12-Feb-1002 11:37.40 Executive.Woskbenah
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
102,815.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Jan-2002 -102,815.28
9%085247 22-IM-2002 0.00
FC 22-hn-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
308,647.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Jan-2002 -308,647.70
9%085247 22-Jan-2002 309,647.70
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
308,647.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Jero2002 -308,647.70
9%085247 22-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 22-ten-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,552.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Jan-2002 -2,552.09
996085247 234en-2002 2,552.09
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,552.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Ian-2002 -2,552.09
996095247 234an-2002 0.00
FC 234em2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-1en-2002 -1,497,447.91
63743DBT7 02272002 23-Im-2002 1,497,447.91
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,50D,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-Jen-2002 -1,497,447.91
63743DBT7 02/272002 23-Ian-2002 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 23-Jen-2002 0.00
11-Feb-1001 11:57.40 Execvlive Woskbeneh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
215,939.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Inn-2002 -215,939.10
996085247 24-Jan-2002 215,939.10
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
215,939.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jan-2002 -215,939.10
996085247 24-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 24-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Jan-2002 -99,921.88
86387THK7 VAR RT 0620/2002 DO 12/201 25-Jan-2002 99,921.88
B GAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Jan-2002 -170.86
86387THK7 VAR RT 0620/2002 DO 1220/ 25-Jan-2002 0.00
111 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Ian-2002 -100,092.74
86387THK7 VAR RT 06202002 DD 1220/ 25-Ian-2002 0.00
FC DAM RAUSCHER INC.MINN 25-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,190.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Ian-2002 -17,190.46
996095247 25-Inn-2002 17,190.46
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,190.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Jan-2002 -17,190.46
996085247 25-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 25-Jan-2002 0.00
11-Feb-2001 11:57:40 Executive Workbench.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGF 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OC9000010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Jan-2002 -1,493,287.50
02581SDR9 04/25/2002 25-Ian-2002 1,493,287.50
B AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Ian-2002 -1,493,287.50
02581SDR9 04/25/2002 25-Jan-2002 0.00
FC AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 25-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,471.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Jan-2002 -6,471.11
996085247 28-Jm.2002 6,471.11
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,471.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Jan-2002 -6,471.11
996085247 28-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 28-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
259,771.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Jan-2002 -259,771.98
996085247 284an-2002 259,771.98
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
258,771.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 284an-2002 -258,771.98
996085247 28-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 28-1an-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,240.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Jan-2002 -6,240.00
996085247 29-Inn-2002 6,240.00
B 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
6,240.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29Jam2002 -6,240.00
996085247 29-1an-2002 0.00
FC 29-1am2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 30-Jan-2002 -2,498,100.00
313313TC2 MAT 02/15/2002 304an-2002 2,498,100.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 30-Jan-2002 -2,498,100.00
313313TC2 MAT02/152002 30-Jan-2002 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,667.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jan-2002 .6,667.20
996085247 31-Jan-2002 6,667.20
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,667.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jan-2002 6,667.20
996085247 31-Ian-2002 0.00
FC 31-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Jan-2002 -998,654.43
313589TR4 MAT 0228/2002 31-Jan-2002 998,654.43
B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 314an-2002 ,998,654.43
313589TR4 MAT 0228/2002 31-Jan-2002 0.00
FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 31-Jan-2002 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
12-Fe6-2001 11:57.40 Executive WorkbeuG
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002 -314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Dca2001 -9,903,125.00
0IF060618 6.000vh 01/01/2032 14-Jm-2002 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-1m-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 14-Dec-2001 -6,991,250.00
OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2031 24-Jm-2002 0.00
PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-DcF2001 -14,643,125.00
OIN090617 8.0001/601/15/2031 24-Jm-2002 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Dcc-2001 -3,490,156.25
OIND62615 6.500%01/15/2032 DID 011151 24-Jm-2002 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 14-Deo-2001 6,991,250.00
OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2032 DO 011151 24-Jm-2002 -6,991,250.00
BC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Dec-2001 4,233,750.00
21HO72619 7.50VI 01/20/2031 24-Jm-2002 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 31-Dec-2001 9,690,625.00
0IF060626 6.000°h02/01/2032 DO 02/01/ 13-Feb2002 -9,690,625.00
BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSDCONSOLID.I2ED
SRARE.SWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRUTIOM SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAPOLOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,000,000.00 COMMH'TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 314Dea2001 -9,690,625.00
0IF060626 6.000%02/012032 DO 02/01/ 13-Feb-2002 9,690,625.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,245,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MIN 03-Jm-2002 -IX7,13&75
31364CZH4 6.490%03/192002 DO 03/199 04-Jan-2002 1,257,13&75
B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,245,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MIN 03-Jen-2002 -23,SMA1
31364CZH4 6.490%03/192002 DO 03/199 04-Jm-2002 0.00
1B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,245,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 03-Jm.2002 -L280,705.56
31364CZH4 6.490%03/192002 DD 03/199 04-1.2002 0.00
FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 044m-2002 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000 00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 03-1m-2002 -6.990,312.50
OIN062623 6.500%02/152032 DD 021151 21-Feb-2002 6,990,312.50
B BEAR SIEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 034m.2002 -3,490,156.25
OIN062623 6.500%02/152032 DO 02/15/ 21-Feb-2002 3,490,156.25
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BUS 04-Jm-2002 -50,834.50
3133M8XL3 5.930%06/142002 DO 061M 07-Jm-2002 50,934.50
B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
12-Feb-1002 11:57:40 Executive Workbe.h.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002-314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 04-Jan-2002 -186.24
3133M8XL3 5.830%06/142002 DD 06/1419 07-Jan-2002 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 04-3an-2002 -51,020.74
3133MSXL3 5.930%06/142002 DO 06/1419 07-Jan-2002 0.00
PC DAM RAUSCHER INC.MINN 07-JW-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS MTN 04-Jan-2002 -203,994.00
31331RD44 4.820%10/072002 DO 10/07/ 07-J.-2002 203,994.00
B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,00D.00 FED FARM OR BK CONS SYS MTN 04-J.-2002 -2,410.00
3133IRD44 4.820%[0/072002 DD 10/07/ 07-Jan-2002 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FED FARM OR BK CONS SYS MTN 04-Jan-2002 -206,404-00
31331RD44 4.820%10/072002 DO 10/07/ 07-Jan-2002 0.00
FC DAN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 07-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
30,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 04-Jan-2002 -30,409.80
3133M8VT8 5.660%05212002 DO 05211 07-Ian-2002 30,409.80
B DAN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
30,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 04.1a 2002 -216.97
3133M8VT8 5.660%05212002 DD 0521/ 074az1-2002 0.00
IS 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57:40 Ezecurive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000loom 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
30,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 04-1m-2002 -30,626.77
3133MSVTB 5.660%05/21/2002 DO 05/21/ 07-Jm-2002 0.00
FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 074m-2002 O.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
80,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 07-Jm-2002 -81,300.00
06423AAC7 6.400%08/01/2002 DD 07/2219 104.2002 91,300.00
B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
80,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 07-Jm-2002 -2,261.33
06423AAC7 6.400%08/012002 DD 07/2219 10-Jan-2002 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
80,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 07-Jm-2002 -93,561.33
06423AAC7 6,400%08/01/2002 DD 07/2219 10-Jan-2002 0.00
FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 104m-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Jan-2002 -3,458,378.00
31364CN79 6.590%05212002 DO 0521/9 15-Jan-2002 3,438,378.00
B DAM RAUSCHER INC.MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Jm-2002 -33,609.00
31364CN79 6.5901/4 05212002 DO 0521/9 15-Jm-2002 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Jm-2002 -3,491,987.00
31364CN79 6.590%05212002 DD 05/2119 15-Jm-2002 0.00
FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 15-Jm-2002 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Executive IPm0mch
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-1an-2002 -14,756,875.00
OIN080625 8.000Y 0 211 5/2 03 2 DD 02/151 21-Feb-2002 14,756,875.00
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS III-Jan-2002 -1,245,315.00
21 H072627 7.5000Y.02202032 DO 021011 21-1`6-2002 1,245,375.00
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Ian-2002 -399,937.50
86387THG6 VAR RT 0321/2002 DO 09201 25-Jan-2002 399,937.50
B DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Jan-2002 -3,102.09
86387THG6 VAR RT 03212002 DO 0920/ 25-Ian-2002 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 24-Jan-2002 403,039.59
86387THG6 VAR RT 03212002 DO 0920/ 25-Jan-2002 0.00
PC GAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 25-Jan-2002 0.00
PAY UPS
FIRED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,383.15 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Jan-2002 -13,383.15
3133T17A4 6.000Y 11/152023 DO 1110119 01-Jan-2002 13,383.15
PU 0.00
11-Feb-1002 I1:57:40 Fxecume Wo kbemh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,383.15 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF SER 162 014an-2002 -13,383.15
3133T17A4 6.000%1 111 5/2 02 3 DO 11/00 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 23-Jan-2002 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,267,929.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOW 04-Ian-2002 1,267,929.82
996095247 041an-2002 -1,267,929.82
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,267,929A2 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04Jan-2002 1,267,929.82
996085247 04-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 04-Im-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-288,051.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 074an-2002 289,051.51
996085247 07-1an-2002 -288,051.51
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-288,051.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Ian-2002 283,051.51
996085247 07-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 07-Ian-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-83,561.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Ian-2002 83,561.33
996095247 10-Jan-2002 -93,561.33
S 0.00
12-Feb-1002 11:57:40 &emi.Wwkbemwh.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 014AN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-83,561.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Ian-2002 83,561.33
996085247 10-Ian-2002 0.00
FC 10-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-167,187.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Jan-2002 167,197.50
996085247 14-Ian-2002 -167,187.50
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
467,187.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-3.2002 167,187.50
996085247 144an-2002 0.00
FC 14-Jen-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2.200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Jan-2002 2,194,303.22
313589UG6 MAT 03/152002 15-Jan-2002 -2,162,462.50
S BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 31,840.72
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 144an-2002 2,194,303.22
313589UG6 MAT 03/152002 15-1en-2002 0.00
FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 154 2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-985,738.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Ian-2002 985,739.15
996085247 15-Jan-2002 -995,738.15
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-985,738.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Jan-2002 985,738.15
996085247 15-Ian-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
496,419.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25.Jan-2002 496,419.83
996085247 25-Ian-2002 496,419.83
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
496,419.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Jan-2002 496,419.83
996085247 25-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 25-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,271,100.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Jan-2002 271,100.00
996095247 30-3an-2002 ,271,100.00
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,271,100.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 304an-2002 271,100.00
996085247 30-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 30-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-71,654.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jan-2002 71,654.43
996085247 31-Jan-2002 -71,654.43
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
.71,654.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jan-2002 71,654A3
996085247 31-J.-2002 0.00
FC 314an-2002 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 31-Da-2001 9,735,937.50
0IF060618 6.000%01/012032 14-Jan.2002 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY I4-Ja 2002 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:37.40 Executive Workbench.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 17
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000loono 014AN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTLDATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 03-Jen-2002 3,502,597.66
OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2032 DO 01/1 S/ 244 2002 -3,493,902.08
S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 8,795.59
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 03-Jen-2002 3,502,597.66
OIN062615 6.500%0 111 5/2 03 2 DO 011151 24-Jen-2002 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Jen-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 034on-2002 7,006,562.50
OING62615 6.500°h01/152032 DO 01/151 24-Jen-2002 -6,997,604.17
S BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 18,958.33
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 03-Jm-2002 7,006,562.50
OIN062615 &500%01/152032 DO 011151 24-Im-2002 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,OOQ000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Jem2002 14,761,796.88
OIND80617 8,000%01/1 512 0 3 2 DO 01/01/ 24-Jon-2002 -14,643,125.00
S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 118,671.88
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-1en-2002 14,761,796.98
OINOB0617 8.000%01/152032 DD 01/011 24-Jen-2002 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 24-Jen-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 18-1en-2002 1,247,250.00
21HO72619 7.500%01202032 DO 01/01/ 24-Jen-2002 -1,233,750.00
S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 13,500.00
/7-FeA-2002 11:57,40 Executive Wo kbmch
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
XS000010000 01-JAN-2002 -314AN-2002
xsD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 11 JUMBOS I8-Jan-2002 1,247,250.00
21 H072619 7.500%01202032 DO 0 1/0 11 24-Jan-2002 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 24-Ian-2002 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,266.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2001 -19,266.00
9129274YS 3.875%0111 5/20 0 9 DD 011151 15-Jul-2001 19.639.02
PDC 373.02
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
19,266.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I5-Jul-2001 -19,266.00
9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DO 011151 15-Jul-2001 0.00
FCC 28-De 2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-19,266.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2001 19.266.00
9128274Y5 3.875%0 111 52 0 09 DO 01/15/ 15-Jul-2001 -19,639.02
PD -373.02
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-19.266.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2001 19,266.00
9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DO 011151 15-Jul-2001 0.00
FC 31-Dec-2001 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,037.70 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Aug-2001 C037.70
79549BBG 1 3.650%02114/2002 DID 02/141 14-Aug-2001 -5,599.89
PD 437.81
---- -. .- ,+ E�enrtive II'mkbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' /9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,037.70 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Aug-2001 6,037.70
79549BBGI 3.650%02114/2002 DD 02/14/ 14-Aug-2001 0.00
PC 31-Dec-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,303.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-No,2001 58,303.50
3133TCE95 VAR FIT 08/152032 15-Nov-2001 0.00
PC 17-1en-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,657.95 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Dec-2001 13,657.95
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/0112028 DD 121011 01-Dcc-2001 0.00
PC 15-ten-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-651.19 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE W000-11150 01-Dec-2001 651A9
302998GE3 7.500%1 210 12 03 0 DD 10/21/9 01-Dec-2001 -637.05
PD 14.14
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-651.19 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000.11150 01-Dec-2001 651.19
302998GE3 T500%12/012030 DD 10/21/9 01-Dee-2001 0.00
PC 09-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-56,244.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Dec-2001 56,244.00
3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Dec-2001 -56,305.51
PI) -61.51
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,280.87 FHLMC GROUP 8G4-0353 01-Jen-2002 16,290.87
3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Jen-2002 -16,692.98
PI) -412.11
11-Feb-1001 11:57.40 Ereeuli.Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSGOW10000 01-JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,280.87 FHLMC GROUP#04.0353 01-Jam2002 16,280.97
3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-701,224.55 FHLMC GROUP OGS-0476 01-Jan-2002 701,224.55
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -712,181.18
PD -10,956.63
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-701,224.55 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Jan-2002 701,224.55
3128DDQ55 7.000Yo 02/012003 DO 02J01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-763.45 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Jan-2002 763.45
36210YY90 6.000%0 411 52 0 2 9 DO 041011 01-Jan-2002 -724.69
PD 38.77
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-763.45 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Jan-2002 763.45
36210YY90 6.000%0 411 5/2 02 9 DO 041011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-831.24 GNMA POOL M0486720 01-Jan-20O2 931.24
36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2029 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -789.03
PD 42.21
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-831.24 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-hn-2002 831.24
36210AVM6 6,000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Jam2002 O.OD
PC 15-Ian-2002 0.00
f1-Feb-2001 1/:57:40 &ec iw Wo kbe0ch
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 21
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,588.46 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-1en-2002 1,588.46
36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 01-Jeo-2002 -1,507.80
PD 80.66
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
4,588.46 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Jan-2002 1,588A6
36210PRY4 6.000°/.01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 014en-2002 0.00
PC 15-ten-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-53.12 GNMA POOLa0497343 01-1en-2002 53.12
36210NP45 6.0001%12/15/2029 DO 12/01/ 014en-2002 -50.42
PD 2.70
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-53.12 GNMA POOLW0497343 014m.2002 53.12
36210NP45 6.000°/.12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-1en-2002 0.00
PC 15-3on-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,253.12 GNMA POOL 80496461 014en-2002 9,253.12
3621OMQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/0l/ 01-1en-2002 -8,783.23
PD 469.89
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,253.12 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Jen-2002 9,253.12
36210MQN4 6.000^h01/15/2029DD01/Ol/ 01-Jen-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jon-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11.03 GNMA POOLN0496284 01-1en-2002 11.03
36210M151 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-1en-2002 -10.47
PD 0.56
11-Feb-1001 11.57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2002 -314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11.03 GNMA POOLN0496284 01-Jan-2002 11.03
36210MJSI 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-31.36 GNMA POOLH0499153 014an-2002 31.36
3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 014an-2002 -29.77
PD 1.59
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-31.36 GNMA POOL80499153 01-Jan-2002 31.36
3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 154ao-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-29.16 GNMA POOL80500917 01-Jan-2002 29.16
36210SPAO 6.000°/a04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-1an-2002 -27.68
PD 1.48
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-29.16 GNMA POOL 00500917 01-1an-2002 29.16
36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029 DD 041011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,554.46 GNMA POOLM0503388 01-1en-2002 1,554.46
36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 014an-2002 -1,475.52
PD 78.94
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,554.46 GNMA POOLH0503388 01-Jan-2002 1,554.46
3621UVF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
11-Feb-1002 11:57:40 Exemtiw Workbench..
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
49.99 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Jan-2002 49.99
36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -47.45
PD 2.54
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
49.99 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-tan-20O2 49.99
36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
42.00 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Ian-2002 42.00
36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Ian-2002 -39.87
PD 2.13
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-42.00 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Jan-2002 42.00
36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD0910I/ 014an-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-110.59 GNMA POOL#0457314 014an-2002 110.59
36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/011 01-Ian-2002 -104.97
PD 5.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-110.59 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Jen-2002 110.59
36208QSB3 6.000%1011 5/2 0 2 8 DD 10/011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,219.28 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Jan-2002 1,219.28
36209AE48 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -1,157,36
PD 61.92
11-Feb-1002 11:37:40 F.evai a Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,219.28 GNMA POOL40465555 01-JM-2002 1,219.28
36209AE48 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,145.76 GNMA POOLN0465546 01-hn-2002 8,145.76
36209AE13 6.000%08/152023 DD 08/01/ 01Jen-2002 -7,732.11
PD 413.65
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9.145.76 CNMA POOLOO465546 014am2002 9,145.76
36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/0l/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
.FC 15-Jen-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,117.75 GNMA POOL4046%88 01-Jan-2002 1,11735
36209EXRS 6.000%11/152028DD11/01/ 01-/an-2002 -1,060.99
PD 56,76
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,117.75 GNMA POOL4046%88 01-Jan-2002 1,117.75
36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028DD 11/011 01-Jan-2002 0,00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,020.21 GNMA POOL40468339 01-Jan-2002 1,02021
36209DHQO 6.000%08/l52028DD0&'0l/ 01-Jan-2002 -968.40
PD 51.81
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,02021 GNMA POOL40468339 01-Jan-2002 1,020.21
36209DHQO 6.000%Wl52028DD08/01/ 01-1an-2002 0.00
FC 154an-2002 0.00
/1-Feb-1002 /1:Sb40 Executive WwkbenaY
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG000loo00 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DAM AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-70.55 GNMA POOL 80468330 01-Jan-2002 70.55
36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -66.97
PD 3.58
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-70.53 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Jan-2002 70.55
36209DHF4 6.000%0 511 5/2 02 8 DO 05/011 01.1en-2002 0.00
PC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-871.01 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Jan-2002 871.01
36209CCX2 6A00%10/l5/2028DD10/0l/ 01-Jan-2002 -926.79
PD 44.23
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-871.01 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Jao-2002 871.01
36209CCX2 6.OE6%MUMS DO 10/Ol/ 01-Jon-2002 0.00
PC 15-ten-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,660.60 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-1en-2002 1,660.60
36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 101011 01-1an-2002 -1,576.27
PD 94.33
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,660.60 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Jae-2002 1,660.60
36209CCQ7 6.000%IW152028 DD 10/011 01.Jan-2002 0.00
FC 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-26,553.97 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Jam2002 26,553.97
36225CC20 7.375%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Jan-2002 .27,134.94
PD -580.87
12-Feb-2002 11:57:40 Ex lhx Wmkbnxk
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-26,553.97 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Jan-2002 26,553.97
36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-21,361.15 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-1an-2002 21,361.15
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/01/9 01-Jan-2002 -21,714.94
PD -353.79
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-21,361.15 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Jan-2002 21,361.15
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DO 12/01/9 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-26,846.69 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Jan-2002 26,946.69
36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DD 04/011 01-Jan-2002 -26,603.39
PD 243.30
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-26,846.69 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-1an-2002 26,846.69
36225CNM4 6.500°A04/202030 DO 04/01/ 01-1an-2002 0.00
FC 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-191,675.66 GNMA If POOL#080408X 01-Jan-2002 191,675.66
36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Jan-2002 -189,728.95
PD 1,946.71
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-191,675.66 GNMA 11 POOL#080408X 01-Jan-2002 191,675.66
36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DO 051011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
FC 22-Jan-2002 0.00
12-Feb-2012 11:57.40 Ezecufive Workbench„
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01JAN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,321.29 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 014an-2002 1,321.29
39810NAE4 T430%06/012003 DD 0229/0 01-1an-2002 -1,301.99
PI) 19.30
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,321.29 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 01-Jan-2002 1,321.29
39810NAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02/29M 01-Jnn-2002 0.00
FC 25-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,035.50 FHLMC GROUP N78-6064 014an-2002 13,035.50
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2029 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2002 -12,717.76
PI) 317.74
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-655.74 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE N000-11150 01-Jnn-2002 655.74
302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-Jnn-2002 -641.50
PD 14.24
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-65574 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE 9000-11150 01-Jan-2002 655.74
302998GE3 7.500%1 2/0 12 0 3 0 DD 102119 01-Jan-2002 0.00
PC 31-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-64,632.48 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 164an-2002 64,632.48
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-1nn-2002 -64,632.48
PI) 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-64,632.48 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16-1an-2002 64,632.48
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 164an-2002 0.00
PC 16-1an-2002 0.00
MATURITIES
11-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Ere.rm Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE r 28
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 014AN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-525,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS DISC 18-Ian-2002 524,001.77
52517KAII 01/182002 18-Jan-2002 -524,001.77
MT 18-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 22-Ian-2002 499,908.33
26055BAN4 01222002 22-Jan-2002 499,908.33
MT 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-Jan-2002 1,495,416.67
63743DAP6 01232002 23-Ian-2002 -1,495,416.67
MT 23-Ian-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Jan-2002 1,496,791.67
02581 SAR2 0125/2002 254an-2002 -1,496,791.67
MT 25-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,227,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK COMNS DIS 30-Ian-2002 2,223,325.45
313385SLI MAT01/302002 30-Jan-2002 -2,223,325.45
MT 304an-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-927,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Jan-2002 925,424.10
313589SM6 MAT 01/312001 31-Jm-2002 -925,424.10
MT 31-Jen-2002 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
12-Feb-2002 11:57:40 Executive Wwkbewh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 19
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01JAN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 08-Inn-2002 100,000.00
3133M74G8 4.995%01/082002 DD 01/0819 084m-2002 -100,496.00
MT 08-Jm-2002 496.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 15-Jm-2002 300,000,00
31359MFF5 6.625%01/152002 DO 1/1420 15-Jm-2002 -304,220.00
MT 15-1m-2002 -4,220.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 PARAMONT COMMUNICATIONS INC IS-Jan-2002 3,500,000.00
699216AG2 7.5001/601/15/2002 DO 0111519 15-Jan-2002 -3,550,470.00
MT 15-Jan-2002 -50,470.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-180,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 17-Jan-2002 180,000.00
3133MSMW7 ZEROCPN 01/172002 DO 091041 174m2002 -177,300.00
MT 17-Jm-2002 2,700.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN ST 17-Jm-2002 1,200,000.00
86387THEI VAR RT 01/172002DD07/191 17-Inn-2002 -1,199,585.94
MT 17-Jm-2002 414.06
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 22-Jm-2002 100,000.00
3133M7DR4 4.875%01/22/2002 DD 0120/9 22-Jan-2002 -99,936.00
MT 224m-2002 64.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS MTN 8TR 00555 28-Jm-2002 250,000.00
37042 WZCS FLTG RT 01/282002 DD 0126/ 28-Jm-2002 -249,260.00
MT 28-Jm-2002 740.00
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY
11-Feb-1001 11:57.40 Executire Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002 -314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,037.70 REV 28-Dec-2001 0.00
79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 31-Dec-2001 5,599.89
SWC 5,599.89
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,716.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO 30-Jan-2002 0.00
9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jan-2002 -10,923.48
SW -10,923.48
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-44,850.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT IN BALANCE 30-Ian-2002 0.00
9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jan-2002 40,050.88
S W 40,050.88
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,373.50 TO BRING ACCOUNT IN BALANCE 30-Jan-2002 0.00
79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 31-Jan-2002 -3,128.88
Sw -3,128.88
INTEREST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Dec-2001 -19,266.00
9128274Y5 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 01/151 0.00
cw - 31-Dec-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 31-Dec-2001 -6,037.70
79549BBGI 3.650%02/14/2002 DO 02/141 0.00
CW 31-Dcc-2001 0.00
/1-Eeb1001 11:57:40 Executive BOrkbench-
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Jan-2002 0.34
996087094 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 02-Jao-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Ian-2002 0.04
996087094 01-Ian-2002 0.00
IT 02-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS MTR 0000 02-Jan-2002 26,962.50
74456QAH9 7.900%09/062002 DD 09/06/0 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 02-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR IST&RE 02-Jan-2002 33,187.50
927804CD4 7.375%07/012002 DO 07114/9 01-1am2002 0.00
IT 02-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 04-Jan-2002 19,639.02
9128274Y5 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 011151 0.00
CWC 04-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Jan-2002 12,775.74
9%085247 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 04-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Ian-2002 88,662.61
996085247 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 04-Jan-2002 0.00
11-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsmI0000 01-JAN-2002 -314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSE
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99.3 CL A-4 08-Ian-2002 2.679.17
74046RFW6 6.430%03/09/2004 DD 0621/9 08-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 08-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 08-Jen-2002 2,497.50
3133M74G8 4.995%01/082002 DO 01/08M 08.Jan.2002 0.00
IT 08-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
651.19 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE N000611150 09-Jan-2002 6,022.74
302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Dee-2001 0.00
IT 09-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DEES 154m-2002 9,937.50
31359MFF5 6.625%01/152002 DD 1/1420 15.Ian.2002 0.00
IT 13-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
51,000.00 MERIDIAN BANCORP INC SUB DEB 15-Jan-2002 2,008.13
589580AB5 7.875%0 711 520 0 2 DD 07/15/9 15Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jam2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 PARAMONT COMMUNICATIONS INC 15-Ian-2002 131,250.00
699216AG2 7.500%01/152002 DO 01/15/9 15-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 134an-2002 4,623.33
25475MAD6 5,840%10/15/2011 DD 03/18/9 15JM-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
12-Fe6-2002 11:57:40 EhenNw Workbewh.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: •33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01JAN-2002 -31JAN-2002
OCSO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
23,000,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2002 434,987.21
9128272M3 3.375%01/1512007 DD 011151 15-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,700,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2002 119,571.79
9128274Y5 3.875%01/1512009 DD 011151 15-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,588.46 GNMA POOL 90491103 15-Jan-2002 1,180.88
36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 01-Jm-2002 0.00
IT 154an-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11.03 GNMA PGOL80496284 15-Jan-2002 48.07
36210MJSI 6.000%01/152029 DD02/01/ 01.Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PMJCO
9253.12 GNMA POOL 80496461 15-Jan-2002 4,237.76
36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01.Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
53.12 GNMA POOL80497343 15.1nn-2002 206.57
36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 121011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 154 2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,280.87 FHLMC GROUP NG4.0353 154an-2002 3,381.58
3128DEMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Exeeaff.Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG000loon0 01JAN-2002 -31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
70U24.55 FHLMC GROUP#G5.0476 15-Jan-2002 20,672.35
3129DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Ian-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31.36 GNMA POOL#0499153 154nn-2002 130.15
3621000E5 6.0004602/152029 DO 02/01/ 014en-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
29.16 GNMA POOL#0500917 15-Jan-2002 108.68
36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029DD04/011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,554.46 GNMA POOI-#0503388 154en-2002 4,295.07
36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 014an-2002 0.00
If I5-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
763.45 GNMA POOL#0506636 15-Jam2002 339.40
36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/011 01-Ian-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,657.95 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-Jan-2002 1,070.96
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028DD 12/01/ 01-Dec-2001 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
49.99 GNMA POOL#0438057 15-Jan-2002 206.96
36207PTN9 6.000%0 511 52 02 8 DO 05/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-JU-2002 0.00
12-£eb-2072 11:57.40 aeculiw Wwkbewi
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ,35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIP770N/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
110.59 GNMA POOL#0457914 15•lan-2002 396.48
36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2029 DD 10/011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,145.76 GNMA POOL#0465546 15-1an-2002 4,297.24
36209AE173 6.000%08/152028 DO 091011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT I5-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,219.28 GNMA POOLOW5555 154an-2002 4,152.09
36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-IM-2002 0.00
IT 15-1a 2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,660.60 GNMA POOL#0467279 15-Jan-2002 266.20
36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15,7028 DO 101011 01-1an-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
871.01 GNMA POOL#0467286 15-Jan-2002 3,451.68
36209CCX2 6.000%10IM023 DO 10/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT I54an-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
70.55 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Jan-2002 195.12
36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,020.21 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-Jan-2002 3,946.68
36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/0l/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Ian-2002 0.00
11-Feb1001 11:57.40 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,117.75 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-Jan-2002 214.00
36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,
42.00 GNMA POOL#0483452 15-Jan-2002 162.59
36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 15-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
831.24 GNMA POOL#0486720 15-Jan-2002 107.10
36210AVM6 6,000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Jnn-2002 0.00
IT 15-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 16-Jan-2002 100,500.00
345397S13 6.700%07/162004 DD 07116/9 16-1an-2002 0.00
IT 16-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
64,632.48 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Jan-2002 3,529.62
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 16-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN ST 17-Jan-2002 16,041.83
86387THEI VAR RT 0 111 712 00 2 DD 07/19/ 17-Ian-2002 0.00
IT 17-Ian-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
58,303.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 17-Jan-2002 10,315.42
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Dec-2001 0.00
IT 17-Jan-2002 0.00
12-Feb-1001 11:57.40 Erecutim WorMendh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. Y37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSO00010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
525,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS DISC I8-Jan-2002 998.23
52517KAJ1 01/18/2002 IS-Jan-2002 0.00
IT I8-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN OTR006 19-Ian-2002 2,403.33
17120QEBO FLTG RT OB/OS/2002 DO 041091 19-Jen-2002 0.00
IT 19-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 22-Jan-2002 2,437.50
3133M7DR4 4.875%01/222002 DD 0120/9 22-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
21,361.15 GNMA If POOL#0080023 22-Jan-2002 4,278.38
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/0119 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
26,553.97 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 22-Jan-2002 5,500.66
36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06101/ 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 22-Jan-2002 91.67
26055BAN4 0122/2002 22-Jam2002 0.00
IT 22-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
26,846.69 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 22-Jan-2002 3,403.08
36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 041011 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 224en-2002 0.00
12-Feb-2002 11:57.40 Fsecutive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01JAN-2002-31JAN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
191,675.66 GNMA II POOL 8080408X 22-Jm-2002 29,028.11
36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Jm-2002 0.00
IT 22-Jm-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-Ian-2002 4,583.33
63743DAP6 01/23/2002 23-Im-2002 0.00
IT 23-Ian-2002 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
13,383.15 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 23-Ian-2002 13,383.15
3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/0" 014m-2002 0.00
IT 23-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 244m-2002 56.013.31
682680Al2 FLTG RT 04/24/2002 DO 0424/ 24-Jm-2002 0.00
IT 24-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25Jm.2002 10,833.33
3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Jm-2002 0.00
IT 254m-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Im-2002 3,208.33
02581 SAR2 01252002 25-Jm-2002 0.00
IT 25-Jm-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,321.29 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 25-Jm-2002 5,035.84
398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 02/29/0 01-lan-2002 0.00
IT 25-Im-2002 0.00
11-Feb-1002 J1:57:40 ExeaHve Wp,0ench.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-JAN-2002-31-JAN-2002
OCS&CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000,00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO MTN 8TR 000 28-Jan-2002 7,250.00
59018YAM3 7.250%07/26/2002 DO 0712610 26-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 28-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS MTN 4TR 00555 284an-2002 1,521.98
37042WZCS FLTG RT01282002 DO 01261 28-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 28-Jan-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 28-Jan-2002 6,471.11
79548EEE8 VAR RT 04292003 DD 04/28/ 0.00
CD 28-Ian-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 29-Ian-2002 6,240.00
31364C3 W6 6.240%07/292002 DD 0729/9 29-Ian-2002 0.00
IT 29-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,227,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK COMNS DIS 30-3an-2002 3,674.55
313385SLI MAT 01/30/2002 30-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 304w-2002 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 31-Jan-2002 -7.21
99000OP14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-Jan-2002 0.00
CW 31-Jan-2002 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
927,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Ian-2002 1,575.90
313589SM6 MAT 01/312001 31-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 31-Jan-2002 0.00
11-F6-2002 11:57 40 Exetutiw Wmkbanck
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocso00010pp0 014AN-2002-314AN-2002
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATEI COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
655.74 WMP/NUNTOON PAIGE 9000-11150 31-JM-2002 6,018.67
302008GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 1021/9 01-Jan-2002 0.00
IT 31-1an-2002 0.00
12-Feb1002 11:57.40 Executive W,nr.4bena4-
FAHR COMMITTEE M-Mg Date TOBG.cf Dir.
02/13/02 02/27f02
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number
FANR02-14 15(d)
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE THE MID-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Mid-Year Financial Report for the period ending
December 31, 2001.
SUMMARY
Attached, in a separately bound document, is the District's Mid-Year Financial Report
for the period ended December 31, 2001. Contained within the Mid-Year Financial
Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds,
the Capital Improvement Program, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance
funds.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 47.76 percent, or $24.9 million of
the 2001-02 net joint operating budget of$52.2 million has been expended. Net costs
have increased $1.24 million, or 5.22 percent in comparison with the same period last
year.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 2001 is $575.42 based on flows of
43.3 billion gallons, or 235.25 million gallons per day. This is $3.86, or 0.68 percent
above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$571.56.
Capital improvement outlays for the first half of the year were 17.72 percent, or
$25,968,900 of the revised budget of$146,585,900.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
G hrp.EWpMNYBmrE Apq,y pppbjppl ayra AplMt Regwtl'03UNIem ts�cl MiN'rfuWpygpl.bx
"°• - '�'� Page 1
ATTACHMENTS
1. District's Mid-Year Financial Report for the period ended December 31, 2001
G:Mq E1s%Wftl dAgenE Pepm 002 BmNApeMa PeGWN30N1¢m 15f01 A4QY,FINnpYRpl.tlM
ft..„ 11 Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE Meetlrgoate Te ad.olDr.
Io7laroz oz
AGENDA REPORT N
i Number bs FA
Orange County Sanitation Distnct FAnnoz ss 1Number
sr I
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR
THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2001 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2001
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period
October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting
requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid
Operating Monies," and the "Lang-Term Operating Monies" are managed by PIMCO,
the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's
investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the
California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark
indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the
District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios
do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
G."dN gendM\ MAgenE Rep QS 29 rd AgmW ReGMe'L20 11l ISlel NvefYrcnlMnB'rtdm
ee".m. eaase Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports \
1
The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement
Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also
attached are Long-Tenn and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts
which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of
September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio,
with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments
such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as
compared to their benchmarks for the period October 1 through December 31, 2001.
Portfolio Performance Summary
Quarter Ended December 31,2001
Liquid Operating Morse. Loa}Tertn Operdtirg Monies 1%)
(%)
Total Rafe Total Rafe of
of Rehm benchmark"' R¢lum benchmark"'
3 Months 0.7 0.7 3.2 4.2
6 Months 2.0 1 1.6 4.3 .3
9 Months 3.3 2.7 7.1 8.6
12 Months 5.0 4.1 10.6 11.9
715 inception 30 Sept 95 5.0 0.1 7.1 7.0
Markel value per PIMC0 31 Dee 01 .4M .3M
Average Quality •AA+• •Aq+•
wmart
Yield(%) a.a 5.0
Estimated Yield to Matunty
arteoy Depmns(Wlthdmwal5) 50.um
Fstimated Annual Income $1.9M
(1) Benchmarks:
• Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index
• Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt. 1-5 Year Bond Index
Market Recap
PIMCO has reported that fixed income assets were among the best performing
investments in an otherwise volatile and disappointing year in financial markets. The
Federal Reserve supplied a powerful tailwind, easing 11 times for a total of 475 basis
points. Seeking to revise the flagging U.S. economy and calm the markets after the
terrorist attacks on September 11 , the central bank drove the nominal federal funds
rate to its lowest level in 40 years. The Fed action fueled a strong rally on the short end
of the yield curve. Two-year Treasury yields fell more than 200 basis points, closing at
3.0 percent, while the 10-year Treasury yield held firm, finishing the year at 5.05
percent, down seven basis points.
G 1.d. Wg LL dP .RGOrts W2 Ba .,n.Rqa MOV�en 151e).N,aNM.1.dO
a•,n,m. saws Page 2
During the fourth quarter, expectations of an imminent recove and event
ry
tightening caused bonds to give back some of their gains. The retreat b
November, as a fall in jobless claims suggested that company layoffs war,
Resilient consumer confidence, bolstered by sharply lower gasoline prices
continued boom in mortgage refinancings, added to the optimism. ShorUintei
Treasury yields climbed as much as 50 basis points and forward markets priceL
almost 200 basis points of Fed tightening by the end of 2002. The long end of th,
curve held up better, aided by the Treasury's announcement that it would stop self.
30-year bonds.
Most fixed income sectors provided positive total returns in 2001. The best performers
for the year were short/intermediate maturity Treasuries and corporate bonds. Non-
investment grade corporates led the bond markets during a difficult fourth quarter.
Despite the superior performance of corporates overall, rising defaults and bankruptcies
indicated that many companies continued to struggle with high debt levels, over-
capacity and declining profit margins. The following is a summary of fixed income
performance by sector for the quarter and year:
• High-grade corporates outpaced Treasuries and mortgages for the quarter and the
year as credit premiums narrowed. Relatively high yields and hopes that cash flow
was poised to improve supported returns of non-investment grade corporates during
the fourth quarter.
• Mortgages continued to offer attractive yield premiums but the sector modestly
lagged Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis for the quarter and the year.
Heightened market volatility detracted from mortgage returns relative to like-duration
Treasuries.
• Treasuries, especially short-term maturities, outpaced most non-U.S. developed
markets in 2001. However, most non-U.S. bonds fared better than Treasuries in the
final quarter amid expectations for faster growth in the U.S.
Portfolio Results
The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of the District turned in a 0.14
percent return over the quarter, under performing the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year
Government Corporate Index by 22 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due
in part to the following factors:
• Based on a secular outlook that calls for a sluggish global economy, PIMCO had
positioned portfolios for weak corporate profits and accommodative global monetary
policies;
• Below benchmark duration was positive for performance as yields rose during the
quarter;
• PIMCO's broader-than-index curve structure was negative as intermediate maturity
yields rose the most;
c Wq.amNBenm�eoere Apenm RwwVoo3 Boom Rpmdp MuoaV`ApS��em,5�el.mvew�en�l4q,rt.aa
flMwO YtW89
Page 3
Mortgages were negative for the quarter as the sector lagged like-duration
Treasuries amid increased market volatility; sound security selection helped mitigate
this impact;
• A corporate underweight was negative as hopes for recovery led credit premiums on
many issues to narrow,
• Modest real return holdings detracted, rising real yields caused these assets to lag
similar-duration alternatives.
The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of the District turned in a 0.74
percent return over the quarter, outperforming the three-month Treasury Bill Index by 9
basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors:
• Maintaining duration slightly above-benchmark paid off as very short term interest
rates fell amid a weak economy;
• Investment grade corporate holding added value as credit premiums narrowed amid
optimism for an economic recovery;
• High quality commercial paper and agency discount notes contributed to
performance.
Market Outlook
PIMCO believes that the global economy will continue to rely on the U.S. as the main
engine of growth in 2002. The U.S. economy will rebound from its current recession
and then settle lower, producing average growth of a modest 2 to 2.5 percent. Business
and consumer risk taking, depressed by uncertainty after the terrorist attacks and the
bursting of the New Economy investment/consumption bubbles, will begin to revive and
lead the upturn. Risk appetites will recover because:
• Liquidity is abundant now that the Federal Reserve has pushed the real federal
funds rate close to zero. The Fed will not tighten while the unemployment rate is still
rising and capacity utilization remains low;
• Fiscal policy, while still in negotiation, will certainly be more stimulative than in the
recent past;
• Consumer income statements are stronger thanks to lower mortgage rates and cash
takeouts, as well as sharply lower gasoline prices; and
• Corporate profits have room to improve, record inventory destocking is poised to
decelerate while trends in ratio of prices received/prices paid are turning more
favorable.
However, investors banking on a return to the exuberant growth of the late 1990s will be
disappointed. Business investment (other than inventory restocking), a major driver of
New Economy growth, will not contribute to recovery this time. Stuck with excess
ca.p.aaaersaa aW.nppa 2aoamnacn r+eon`�mzu.em�slef.i,wscrenr�re�++ea< Page4
ge„ua: aao
capacity, corporations will continue to limit capital expenditures, instead using free cash
flow to dress up their debt-laden balance sheets. Corporate belt tightening will not be
J confined to capital budgets. Under pressure from shareholders to boost stock prices,
management will use layoffs and/or wage cuts to bolster profits, especially in industries
where pricing power remains weak. The resulting anxiety about employment and
incomes will limit the resurgence in consumption.
PIMCO believes they will add value by shifting away from the more cautious posture
they had adopted last year, when bonds rallied and then abruptly reversed course. In a
more range-bound market, where yield will comprise a bigger portion of total return than
capital gains, they will emphasize assets with attractive yield premiums relative
Treasuries. That includes mortgages, where such premiums remain near record levels,
but also corporate and emerging market bonds. Historically attractive valuations and
improving credit fundamentals present opportunities to increase investment grade
corporate allocation and also selectively add to high yield positions.
Another compelling PIMCO strategy involves taking exposure on the short end of the
U.S. yield curve, where forward markets prices in more Fed tightening than is likely to
occur. With the shortlntermediate portion of the yield curve relatively steep, they also
expect to reap gains as holdings "roll down"the curve from higher to lower yield levels.
PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Term Portfolio
• Anticipating range-bound rates, PIMCO will target duration slightly above benchmark
to earn incremental yield from intermediate mortgages and corporates;
• Employ a broader-than-index maturity structure to take advantage of value across
the yield curve;
• Retain mortgage emphasis, which provide near-record yield premiums and strong
credit quality;
• Take advantage of compelling values and improving credit fundamentals in the
corporate sector, adding to high-grade positions; and
• Trim real return bond positions. Even though they are currently attractive for the
long term, real yields are unlikely to fall and inflation adjustments will be modest in
the current economic cycle.
PIMCO's Portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio
• Target duration up to 0.25 year above the benchmark to capture additional yield and
take exposure where markets are pricing in Fed tightening that is unlikely to occur;
• Take advantage of compelling values and improving credit fundamentals in the
corporate sector, emphasizing floating rate notes that add incremental yield;
• Maintain holdings of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes to
add value and liquidity to the portfolio.
GM AQ• ggp'�b20?JVan 15�e4YiwztmmlWB•�x
Page 5
a
Portfolio Market Values v
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the following
table, and in the attached bar chart.
Liquid Long-Tom
Quanef operaung Operaung
EndLg Monies(SM) Monlu(SM)
31 MaMh 01 35.0 382.7
30 June 01 425 386.8
30 Sept01 43.1 368.7
31 Dec—01 43A 354.3
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart
4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2)
5. Historical Yield Curve Graph
G1P.Ele�pe�AWW R4W110@ B apv nepeNlONatlen 15(c)hvelnwWa =
Page 6
Prepared by Finance, 2/4/02, 3:24 PM
OCSD Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$450,000,000
$400,000,000 -
$350,000,000 ---- - -- ---- -- - -
$300,000,000 -- - --- - -
$250,000,000 ----- ___-_._- --_ -_
$200,000,000 ---- --- -- - -- -- - - ----
$150,000,000 ---- - -- -- -- — -- - -----
$100,000,000 ---- -- -- - - --- — --- - --
$50,000,000 -- -- -- - -- ---- ----
$0
31 Dec 00 31 Mar 01 30 Jun 01 30 Sep 01 31 Dec 01
0 Liquid Operating Monies a Long-Term Operating Monies
" '--^''"'irin\2270\aeggi\Finance\investmgmtprogram
LIQUID OPERATING MONIES
Portfolio Characteristics
Orange County Sanitation District
120
100 211111uht, 09/30101
Total Market Value($MM) 43.1 43.4 is ■12/31/01
Quarterly Contributions($MM) 0.0 0.0 >se 80
Estimated Annual Income($MM) 2.1 1.9 % 60 4148
Estimated Duration(yrs) 0.3 0.2
40 29Y5 24
Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 2.8 0 2 0 23
Average Maturity(yrs) 0.3 0.3 20 6 6
Average Quality AA- AAA 0iiiiiiit00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
A1/Pf MA M A gaff. SM 8A 8 Belowa
AWP1
180 120
160 Seclor3 ■9Y30101 Maturity° ■SI30101
140 ■12/31/01
m 100 ■12131JOI
�' _
= 8 68
�� � 0 100100
ie 60 J52
so 80
15 80 0 40 25
19
2e 40 20 17 10
20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0
0 0
GoA Mg Corp Non US$ Emerging Other Net Cash? p 3 mo 3 6 mo 6 9 and 9-12 fro 1-5 yes 5'M
Develop Madams M.Mitts.
11 a ®®
>12 a 0 0 Government Futures 0.0 0.0
8- 12 16 16 Money Market Futures' 0.0 0.0
7-8 2 7 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0
6-7 26 16 Mortgage Backed" 0.0 0.0
5-6 5 8 Other' 0.0 0.0
<5 51 53
Average Coupon 5.1 4.4
1 Measure of a bond part libs for a boners)price sensitivity to changes in interest mass. It is a weighted maturity at present value of all principal and interest payments.
2 Includes quality rating of rash equivalents backing fulumsdonward commitments.
3 Other includes Yankmal ro bonds,convertibles 6 preferred stocks,Net Cash I Money Markets includes T-bills,STIF,CP,BAs and CDs,less amount to back bond futures,Inwards and unsettled trades.
4 Mongage-backed mounges are categorized by weighted average life.
5 Includes Eurodollar,Fetl Funds,and T-bill futures.Due to the three-month maturity of the Eurodollar futures contracts,the nominal value hes been divided by bur.
6 Securities determined by PIMCO to have potentially less stable duration characteristics,sun as: IO S PO Sense,Support class CMOs,and hus.Ftoaters.
7 Category includes securities whkh derive their value from underlying interest rates,such as swaps,credit spreads,and non-U.S.derivatives.
LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES
Portfolio Characteristics
Orange County Sanitation District
b b MFM 70 Quality ■91=1
Total Market Value($Mod) 368.7 354.3 3 BO 5854 11112131101
Quarterly Contributions($MM) -30.0 -1&0 j 50
Estimated Annual Income($MM) 19.4 16.8 � 40
Estimated Duration(yrs)' 2.1 2.2 f 30
Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 3.8 3.9 X 30 16 23�
Average Maturity(yrs) 3A 2.9 10 1 7 7
Average Quality AA- AA+ 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00
A1N1 MA M A Before BM M B 84we
A1N1
60 6xtors ■9rd0101UWft ■913"1
i50 a5 ■12131MIre
01201101
;40 41 j40 36 3B
9 M S 31 27
30 L 30
19
7i 10 14 8 20 18
ae 70 73 to 8 x 13 1
LJM
10
0 _ `_
0
Go.: hill Cory Nan US$ Emerging Other Net Cabrr 0-1 yrs 14 yrs 33M &to" 10.2()yrs Za ya
Develop Millions Equly
�® e
, 12 0 0 Government Futures 0.0 0.0
6-12 4 1 Money Market Fulures3 0.0 0.0
7.8 19 13 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0
6.7 30 40 Mortgage Backed° 0.0 0.0
5-6 11 7 Other' 0.0 0.0
<5 36 39
Average Coupon 5.5 5.0
I Measure or a hard landlords(or a ladld'3)pr2 brotherly to changes in Interest rates. It Is a weghled matunty at wesenl value of all principal and interest payments.
2 Other ecludes VanheelEuro bonds.conveners and muNf Ilan ppMs: Net Cash Equivalents'equal cash MNivalenls less amount used to hack futures.forwards and installed trades
3 Includes Eurodollar,Fed Funds,and T-rill futures.Due to the IMeo-month malady of Eurodollar hiwes contracts.Me mmwl value has been divided by lour
4 Securities determined by PIMCO to have ootentrany Itls stable duration characteristics,such as 10 6 PO Ships.Support dass CMOs.and Inverse Floaters
5 creation,includes securd an which derive their value from urM rd th,mtere t rates.such as swaps,credit spreads,and and U 5 derivatives
Prepared by Finance,2W2, 11:43 AM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
5.00
5.75 --- `— -
5.50 ----- —
5.25 — —
5.00
4.75 --
4.50
4.25 - —
4.00 --
w 3.75 —
3.50
3.25
3.00 —
2.75 —
2.50
2.25 —
2.00
1.75
1.50
E E i 5 4 4 5 9 a` 5 ppS
- I 29Jun-01 t28-Sep-01 --m-31-Dec-01
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\HleloricalTREASURYyieldcurve
FAHR COMMITTEE Needng Date To 8d-of Dir.
i 02/13/02 02R7102
AGENDA REPORT ROM Number 1tQ11Ninnbw
FAHR02-16 I 15(n
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager
Originator. Judy Bucher, Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: Orangewood Children's Foundation Business Mentor Program
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-04, Establishing a Business Mentor Program in
Cooperation with the Orangewood Children's Foundation.
SUMMARY
The Orangewood Foundation is a private, non-profit organization,which has provided
support for abused and neglected children in Orange County for over 16 years. Their
"On My Own" programs for current and emancipated youth include the business mentor
program. Many youth who leave the foster care system at the age of 18 have great
difficulty finding and keeping jobs. Consequently, they are becoming members of our
community's homeless population and rely on public support to survive.
The purpose of the business mentor program is to provide job opportunities for these
youth and to assist them in gaining valuable work experience. At the same time, they
will have the support and guidance of a mentor to aid them in long-term career planning,
setting goals, problem solving in the work environment, and leaming appropriate
business behavior and protocol.
The District has identified areas of opportunity for Community Intems to develop job
skills while assisting our regular workforce. The resulting cost effective increase in
productivity and development of staffs leadership skills provides a significant benefit to
the District. Youth ages 18-24 would be recruited from a waiting list of applicants
referred by the Orangewood staff. District job duties especially suited to a Community
Intem position include:
Wastewater sample collection Parts runner
Equipment and area clean up Painting
Groundskeeping Light administrative work
Assisting in equipment maintenance
The direct supervisor would provide day-today coaching, training and feedback on
performance. Community intems would be treated as any other District employee
responsible for their own actions, and supervisors would follow District policy and
protocol for dealing with any work performance issues.
The District and mentor would commit to one year of participation in the program. The
mentor will provide support and career-planning guidance, assist the youth to have a
successful job experience and serve as a leadership model.
Implementing a business mentor program would provide a direct benefit to the District,
while contributing to our community and having a potentially far-reaching positive impact
on the lives of individuals.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The minimum hourly wage recommended by Orangewood staff is $7.00 per hour
($14,560 per year). A first-year program consisting of up to four Community Interns
would cost a maximum of approximately $60,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
1) To authorize a Business Mentor Program consisting of fewer or more than a
maximum of 4 Community Interns
2) Not to adopt Resolution No. 02-04, establishing a Business Mentor Program.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed resolution
Gn„y.dWdN ALB AgM Aepare=eoerd Agem Rep WNNIa 15(0,& inea IorPmdmmdm
�%Sw,.MdN, Page 2
t RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-04
ESTABLISHING BUSINESS MENTOR PROGRAM
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS
MENTOR PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE ORANGEWOOD
CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION.
WHEREAS, many youth who leave Orange County's foster rare system at the age of 18
have great difficulty finding and keeping jobs;
WHEREAS,due to the lack of job skills and experience in obtaining and keeping
employment, many of these youth are becoming members of our community's homeless
population and rely on public support to survive;
WHEREAS, the Orangewood Children's Foundation has established the"On My Own"
business mentor program to provide job opportunities to youth leaving foster care and to assist
them in gaining valuable work experience;
WHEREAS,the business mentor program also gives participating youth the support and
guidance of a mentor to aid them in long-tens career planning, goal setting, problem-solving in
the work environment and learning appropriate business behavior and protocol;
WHEREAS, the District has identified opportunities for community intems to provide
valuable assistance to our regular workforce in carrying out the work of the District;
WHEREAS, a business mentor program will significantly contribute to the District
through increased productivity and leadership opportunities while having a potentially far-
reaching positive impact on the lives of individuals.
NOW THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That a business mentor program be established in cooperation with the
Orangewood Children's Foundation
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 27, 2002.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
G:k-P.dW%dmiMBSVtesolutons\200902-04.Businoss Mentondw
T
FAHR COMMITTEE Neeaoo1 a" T0081 r.
O2 3/02 02 i7/02
AGENDA REPORT RemNum 1h NUMW
Ha1R02-18 15(g)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources
Originator. James Matte, Acting Safety Supervisor
SUBJECT: Injury and Illness Prevention Program Safety Policy
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 02-05, Adopting Policies and Procedures for Establishing the
District's Written Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy, SAFETY-POL-101, and
Subsequent Safety Policies Named Therein
SUMMARY
Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 3203, and California Labor Code,
Section 6401.7, require employers to establish, implement and maintain an effective
injury prevention program. To ensure regulatory compliance and to address safety and
health issues similar to those identified during the August-December 2001 Cal-OSHA
inspection, staff is overhauling the District's safety and health program. The first step in
the process is establishing an Injury and Illness Prevention (IIP) Program. The Injury
and Illness Prevention Program Safety Policy will support staff in working together to
carryout effective accident prevention in the workplace.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not Applicable
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information Rem)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Basic to voluntary compliance is the Cal-OSHA required Injury and Illness Prevention
(IIP) Program. The IIP Program must establish and maintain the following items.
i
Responsibility-The IIP Program must provide the names and/or job titles of the
persons with the authority and responsibility for its implementation.
Compliance -The IIP Program must be set forth in writing to ensure that employees
comply with safe and healthful work practices.
Communication —The IIP Program must identify a system for communicating with
employees about safety and health matters.
Hazard Assessment- The IIP Program must provide procedures for identifying and
evaluating workplace hazards.
Accident/Exposure Investigation -The IIP Program must provide procedures for
investigating workplace injuries or illnesses.
Hazard Correction -The IIP Program must identify methods and procedures for
correcting any unsafe or unhealthful work conditions or work practices in a timely
manner.
Training and Instruction -The IIP Program must provide for an effective program of
instructing employees in general safe work practices and hazards specific to each job.
Keeping Records-The IIP Program must provide adequate written documentation of
the steps taken to establish and maintain the employers IIP Program.
Labor-Management Safety and Health Committee -The IIP Program labor-
management safety committee must be a committee made up of employees
representing District management and represented employees that meet to set safety
goals and objectives and to solve safety related issues.
ALTERNATIVES
Not Applicable
CEQA FINDINGS
Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 —Resolution No. OCSD 02-5
Attachment 2- Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy(SAFETY-POL-101)
Gpwp.ErsUgnEarBmN AW.ftWI3029om0 A .W ftWW20M.15(y),IIP POI,,d.
qe„ . OMW2 Page 2
i
Y
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-05
ESTABLISHING THE DISTRICT'S WRITTEN INJURY AND ILLNESS
PREVENTION PROGRAM POLICY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
FOR ESTABLISHING THE DISTRICT'S WRITTEN INJURY AND ILLNESS
PREVENTION PROGRAM POLICY, SAFETY-POL-101, AND SUBSEQUENT
SAFETY POLICIES NAMED THEREIN
Whereas, State law(Labor Code Section 6401.7)requires employers to establish,
implement and maintain an effective injury prevention program; and
Whereas, State law(Title 8 in the California Code of Regulations, Section 3203) requires
all California employers to have a written, effective injury and illness prevention program that
addresses hazards pertaining to the particular workplace covered by the program; and
Whereas, it is necessary to establish a policy to implement and maintain an Injury and
Illness Prevention Program ("Program")that provides for the District and employees to jointly
work together to carryout effective accident prevention in the course of District operations.
NOW,THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,AND ORDER:
Section 1: Adootion of Policy and Establishment of Proaram. The Board of Directors
of District hereby adopts an Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy and authorizes the
establishment of an Injury and Illness Prevention Program, set forth on Exhibit"A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: Authorization for Development of Subseauent Safety Policies Named
Therein. The development of Safety polices named in the Injury and Illness Prevention Program
Policy is authorized, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6401.7 and Title 8 of the California Code
of Regulations and Cal-OSHA Standards as appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 27, 2002.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
G:\wpAp\admimBS\Re tudons\2002UIP Poicy.dw
7
d
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Safety Division
SAFETY-POL-101
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
APPROVALS
Approved by: Date:
General Manager
Approved by: Date:
Duador of Human Resouroas Manager
Approved by: Date:
Human Resourcesisafeiy Manager
PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY
Rev. Date Approval
0
This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this
document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and
Emergency Response Division public folder to ensure that they have the latest version.
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFM410L•101
Contents
1. Purpose............................................................................................... 4
2. Definitions........................................................................................... 4
3. Requirements ..................................................................................... 5
3.1 Program Responsibilities...................................................................................5
3.1.1 Administration..........................................................................................6
3.1.2 Management and Supervision .................................................................7
3.1.3 Employee.................................................................................................7
3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis.......................................................................7
3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis .....................................................................................7
322 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys.............................................7
3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas..................................................9
3.2.4 Routine Hazard Analysis..........................................................................9
3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards...............................................................10
3.2.6 Incident and Accident Investigations......................................................10
3.2.7 Pattern Analysis.....................................................................................10
3.3 Hazard Prevention and Control.......................................................................10
3.3.1 Professional Expertise ...........................................................................11
3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures...............................11
3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment...........................11
3.3.4 Emergency Preparedness and Planning................................................12
3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance......................................................................12
3.4 Safety Training ................................................................................................12
3.4.1 Training Profiles.....................................................................................13
3.4.2 Employee Training.................................................................................13
3.5 Safety Communication....................................................................................13
3.5.1 Signage..................................................................................................13
3.5.2 SafetyLine..............................................................................................14
3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins..................................14
3.5.4 Memorandums.......................................................................................14
3.5.5 Safety Intranet........................................................................................15
3.5.6 Verbal Communication...........................................................................15
3.5.7 Safety Committee ..................................................................................15
3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box...........................................................................15
3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs .....................................................16
3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline.......................................................16
3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement.....................................................................16
3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions...................................................16
Injury and Illness Prevention Program smery-powo1
tl
3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations...............................................................le
3.8 Recordkeeping .............................:..................................................................16
3.8.1 Inspection Records ................................................................................17
3.8.2 Training Records....................................................................................17
3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records............................................17
3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives.....................................................17
3.10Coordination of Contractor Programs..............................................................17
4. References........................................................................................ 1s
5. Attachments ..................................................................................... 19
1. Purpose............................................................................................. 22
2. Requirements ................................................................................... 22
2.1 Written Compliance Programs.........................................................................22
1. Purpose
Every California employer must establish, implement and
maintain a written Injury and Illness Prevention (IIPP) Program
and a copy must be maintained at each worksite. The
requirements for establishing, implementing and maintaining an
effective written Injury and Illness Prevention Program are
contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations,
Section 3203 (8 CCR 3203). The purpose of this Injury and
Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) is to ensure the District
establishes implements and maintains a safety and health
program.
2. Definitions
CMMS Computerized Maintenance Management System
Imminent Hazard Any condition or practice in a place of employment that
constitutes a hazard which could reasonably be expected to
cause death or serious physical harm immediately or before the
imminence of the hazard can be eliminated through regular
enforcement procedures.
Injury and Illness A written program stating what the District, management and
Prevention Plan employees will do with respect to safety.
Manager Employee who :
• manages, plans, supervises and coordinates the operations
and activities of one or more major District divisions and
works under general direction or administrative direction of a
Department Director of the General Manager, exercising
discretion in applying general goals and policy statements
and in resolving organizational and service delivery problems
and;
• Organizes and directs the work of subordinate staff
• Assumes significant responsibility for a variety of personnel
activities in such areas as selection, training and disciplinary
actions and;
• Assumes significant responsibility for the preparation and
administration of the assigned budget(s)
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2I13102 4 of 28
Odocuments and seftingsUryleVocal settingsVemporary internet 0lestclk101safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
Process A series of actions or operations directed toward a result.
Program The person assigned the task of maintaining and auditing the
Administrator Injury and Illness Prevention Program
Red Tag A red colored tag placed by an employee prohibiting the use
tools or equipment because of the belief that the use of the tool
or equipment will result in an accident or injury.
Supervisor Employee who:
Supervises, assigns and reviews the work of subordinates in
assigned sections or work units and;
Works under direction or general direction of higher level
supervisory or management staff, exercising discretion in
selecting appropriate resources to use in accomplishing
assigned work and;
Assumes responsibility for recommending a variety of
personnel actions in such areas as performance evaluation,
training, selection and disciplinary measures and;
Ensures that appropriate policies and procedures are
followed by subordinates and;
Monitors, coordinates and assists in developing the budget
for assigned area
Safety Committee A committee made up of employees representing District
management and represented employees who meet to set
safety goals and objectives and to solve safety related issues
3. Requirements
The required elements listed below are the ten elements of the
Injury and Illness Prevention Program as required by the
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal-
OSHA). Speck details of each element may be found in
speck referenced standard operating procedures, where
applicable.
3.1 Program Responsibilities
This section outlines the responsibilities for the implementation
and maintenance of this Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 5 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyleXiocal settings\temporary Internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
3.1.1 Administration
1. The Safety Division (Safety) shall be responsible for
maintaining the written Injury and Illness Prevention
Program.
A. The Safety Supervisor shall be the IIPP Program
Administrator.
2. The Executive Management team (EMT) shall ensure that
the District's safety programs have sufficient resources to
maintain a safe and healthful workplace. Resources include
but are not limited to:
A. A competent safety staff.
B. An adequate budget to maintain and improve the safety
and emergency response program.
C. An adequate budget for required controls to minimize
safety and health risks to District personnel, suppliers
and the public.
D. An adequate budget for required personal protective
equipment as determined by Safety.
E. Time for District staff to attend required safety training
at a frequency and duration determined by Safety.
3. The Safety Division, in coordination with affected divisions,
shall be responsible for ensuring that safety policy, safety
procedures, safety programs and safe work practices are
developed.
4. Safety Division personnel shall have the authority to ensure
that unsafe operations are stopped and that unsafe tools
and equipment are removed from service in accordance
with Safety-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority or if they believe,
in their professional judgement, an imminent danger exists.
5. The District's General Manager shall be responsible for
ensuring District managers and supervisors comply with the
provisions of this IIPP and other safety and health
programs.
6. The Manager over the Safety Division shall be responsible
for ensuring the IIPP and other safety and health programs
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2I13IO2 6 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary internet filesWOO\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
i
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
are implemented.
7. A copy of this IIPP shall be available to all employees either
in an electronic or hard copy format.
3.1.2 Management and Supervision
1. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are
provided with the proper tools and personal protective
equipment.
2. Management and supervision shall ensure employees follow
safe work practices, including but not limited to the wearing
of personal protective equipment.
3. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are
appropriately disciplined for infractions of safety rules,
policies, procedures and programs.
4. Management and supervision shall ensure periodic
inspections of work areas are completed and documented in
accordance with Safety-SOP-1 01.1, Periodic Workplace
Inspections.
5. Management and Supervision shall ensure that unsafe
operations are stopped and that unsafe tools and equipment
are removed from service in accordance with Safety-SOP-
101.2, Red Tag Authority.
6. Management and supervision shall ensure identified
hazards are reported, documented and corrected.
3.1.3 Employee
1. Employees shall comply with safe work practices, policies,
procedures and safety programs.
2. Employees shall conduct daily inspections of their work area
to check for unsafe conditions. This includes but is not
limited to:
A. Personal protective equipment
B. Safety equipment such as fire extinguishers, safety
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 7 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local sedings\temporary Internet fileslolkl 0\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
showers and eyewashes
C. Tools and equipment
D. Vehicles.
3. Employees shall correct unsafe conditions as soon as
possible, including the replacement of personal protective
equipment.
4. Employees shall report unsafe conditions that cannot be
corrected to supervision immediately and submit a CMMS
request.
5. Employees shall attend safety training at the scheduled
time.
6. Employees escorting contractors, vendors or visitors shall
ensure that the proper personal protective equipment is
used at all times and all safe work practices are observed.
3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis
The District has developed procedures for identifying and
evaluating work place hazards, including scheduled periodic
inspections to identify unsafe conditions and work practices.
Inspection guidelines may be found in Safety-SOP-101.1,
Periodic Workplace Inspection Procedures.
3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis
Engineering, Operation and Maintenance, Process Engineering,
Facilities Maintenance, Purchasing or any other division
proposing any process change that has the potential to impact
the safety and health of District employees, contractors or
Visitors shall, in coordination with Safety, conduct a pre-use
analysis to determine the impact on safety. Pre-use analysis
shall be conducted in accordance with SafetySOP-101.3 Pre-
Use Analysis.
3.2.2 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys
The Safety Division, in coordination with management and
supervision, shall determine the scope and frequency for any
comprehensive safety, health or industrial hygiene surveys.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113102 8 of 28
cAdocuments and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary internal files\olklo\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
u
Survey scope and frequency shall be based upon:
1. Regulatory requirements.
2. Literature review for new information on recognized
hazards.
3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or
equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a
new occupational safety and health hazard.
4. Employee input when applicable.
5. The best judgement of Safety.
The frequency of inspections shall not exceed one inspection
per calendar quarter.
3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas
1. Division management and supervision shall be responsible
for conducting periodic inspections of each work area to
identify and evaluate hazards.
2. Periodic inspections shall be conducted in accordance with
Safety-SOP-101.1, Periodic workplace Inspections.
3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or
equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a
new occupational safety and health hazard, supervision
and/or management shall contact Safety to assist in a pre-
Use Assessment in accordance with Safety-SOP-101.3,
Pre-Use Analysis.
4. Whenever a manager/supervisor is made aware of a new or
previously unrecognized hazard, Safety shall be contacted.
5. Division management and supervision shall not rely on
periodic inspections performed by other divisions or
committees as a substitute for required inspections.
3.2.4 Routine Hazard Analysis
The Safety Division routinely conducts hazard analysis of District
operations and construction activities for jobs the Safety Division
deems hazardous and all confined space entries.
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 9 of 28
c:ldocuments and settingslkymocal settings\temporary Internet fileslolklMsafety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL.1o1
0
3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards
Employees are encouraged to report known and potential safety
and health hazards. Mechanisms for reporting these hazards
include:
1. Reports to management and supervision
2. Reports through CMMS
3. Electronic mail (e-mail)to SafetyLine or Safety staff
4. Safety Suggestion boxes
5. Safety committee meetings
6. Reports to an employee's bargaining unit representative
7. Face to face meetings with Safety staff.
3.2.6 Incident and Accident Investigations
Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all
incidents requiring a Property Disposition Report, all motor
vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other
incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety.
Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with
Safety-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting.
Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all
incidents involving $ 1,000.00 of property damage, all motor
vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other
incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety.
Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with
Safety-POL-202,Accident Investigation and Reporting.
3.2.7 Pattern Analysis
Cal-OSHA logs and accident investigations shall be periodically
reviewed by Safety to determine if any accidents or near misses
have similarities.
3.3 Hazard Prevention and Control
Accidents are prevented through the timely recognition and
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Dale 2/13102 10 of 28
g:\wp.dta\hr\650\shared documents\safety policies-sops-formsWinal-safety policies\safety-pol-101 injury
and illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-PCL-1o1
v
correction of hazards before someone is injured or property is
damaged.
3.3.1 Professional Expertise
The District will ensure that safety and emergency response
division staff is adequately trained in the hazards inherent to a
wastewater treatment plant. This includes providing staff with
the resources necessary to perform assigned jobs, including but
not limited to the following:
1. Annual professional development
2. Certification maintenance as required by the certification
authority, and as provided by district policy on certification
reimbursement
3. Professional memberships
4. Reference materials, such as:
A. Books
B. Codes, laws, regulations and consensus standards
C. Internet access in accordance with established district
policy.
3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures
The District will develop and maintain safety policies, procedures
and programs to ensure compliance with applicable Federal
OSHA and Cal-OSHA requirements. Safety Policies and
Procedure titles may be found in Safety-SOP-000.1 Control of
Polices, Procedures, Programs.
3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment
The District shall use engineering controls to reduce employee
exposures to physical and chemical hazards. Personal
protective equipment shall be used when engineering controls
are not feasible, have not been installed, or when emergency
situations dictate such use. The District shall provide all
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 11 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevenlion.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
required personal protective equipment, except as noted in
Safety-SOP-102.8, Employee Procured Personal Protective
Equipment.
3.3.4 Emergency Preparedness and Planning
The District has developed an Integrated Emergency Response
Plan designed to prepare the District and employees for all types
of emergencies, including but not limited to:
1. Medical emergencies
2. Fires
3. Earthquakes
4. Floods
5. High water Flows
6. Utility outages
7. Hazardous materials spills
8. Threatened or actual terrorist activities
3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance
The operations and facilities maintenance divisions have
developed a preventative maintenance program to ensure
critical equipment does not fail and that safety related equipment
is properly maintained. The CMMS system tracks the scheduled
maintenance of these items.
3.4 Safety Training
Safety training is required for all District employees. New
employees shall receive a New Employee Safety Orientation to
familiarize them with the hazards of a wastewater treatment
plant and District safety policies and procedures. Safety
training is typically based on job classification, hazards that will
be anticipated in a job and the employee's actual job duties.
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Dale 2/13/02 12 of 28
c:\dowrnents and set0ngs*yleVocal settings\temporary internet riles\olk1O\safely-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
u
3.4.1 Training Profiles
The Safety shall meet with the manager or supervisor of each
employee to determine which safety training classes shall be
attended by each employee. Once a safety training profile has
been developed for an employee, the training listed on the
profile is mandatory. Safety and manager/supervisor shall use
the following criteria to determine safety training requirements:
1. Job description
2. Actual job duties
3. The anticipated job tasks of the employee
4. Anticipated future job tasks
5. Regulatory requirements
6. District requirements based on
i. previous job task requirements
ii. best industry practices.
3.4.2 Employee Training
Employees shall receive safety training before they are required
to perform a task and at the frequency specked in specific
safety policies and procedures.
3.5 Safety Communication
The District utilizes several methods to communicate safety and
health requirements, safety warnings and safety tips to all
employees.
3.5.1 Signage
The District posts hazard-waming signs where necessary to
communicate safety and health requirements, safety warnings
and safety tips to all employees. Signage is posted in
accordance with Title 8 CCR §3340. Accident Prevention Signs.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113102 13 of 28
c:\documents and seltings\kyle\local settings\temporary intemet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
s
3.5.2 SafetyLine
SafetAine is a short tip on a variety of safety topics that affect
District staff both on and off the job. SafetyLine is distributed to
all District employees with e-mail accounts on payday.
3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins
SAFE bulletins are issued on specific safety related items
explaining how something should be done, or explaining how
specific components of a safety program are to be implemented.
Requirements and guidelines for developing SAFE Bulletins may
be found in Safety-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone
(SAFE) Bulletins.
1. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered District policy for items
not covered by specific policies.
2. A list of SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFE Bulletin 000,
List of SAFE Bulletins.
3. SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years.
4. SAFE Bulletins greater than three (3) years old shall not be
considered District policy.
3.5.4 Memorandums
The Safety Division will periodically issue memorandums
regarding speck safety, health and hazardous waste issues.
1. Memorandums shall be limited to a single topic.
2. Memorandums maybe issued for the following reasons:
A. To clarify an existing policy
B. To implement a new policy on an emergency basis
(1) Memorandums implementing new policy
requirements shall only be in force until:
a. A new policy has been developed; or
b. A SAFE bulletin has been developed;or
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 14 of 29
c:\documents and settings\kyleVocal settingsltemporary internal files\oik10\safety-poi-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
a
c. A Ninety (90) daytime period has elapsed
C. To provide information
D. To offer recommendations
3. A memorandum shall not revoke or supemede an adopted
policy, unless authorized by the Director of Human
Resources and the General Manager by signature.
4. E-mail shall not replace a memorandum.
3.5.5 Safety Intranet
The Safety Division maintains an intranet site where employees
can go to obtain information on safety and health issues.
Employees can access the Safety Intranet site by following the
instructions in attachment A.
3.5.6 Verbal Communication
Safety Division staff is available for contact regarding concerns
over safety and health issues.
1. Verbal communication shall not be used to change District
policy.
3.5.7 Safety Committee
The district has agreed to form a labor-management safety
committee to address work related safety concerns. In addition,
subject specific safety sub committees may be formed at any
time with the concurrence of the Labor-Management Safety
Committee to address specific safety concerns. Safety
Committees shall be governed in accordance with Safety-SOP-
000.7, Safety Committees.
3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box
There are Safety Suggestion Boxes located around both Plant 1
and Plant 2. The purpose of the boxes is to allow employees to
submit suggestions to Safety either by identifying themselves or
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113102 15 of 28
Odocuments and settings\kyWocal settings\temporary internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
0
anonymously.
3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs
Safety has developed a rewards and recognition program for
employees who go above and beyond safe work practices and
consistently display a positive safety attitude.
3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline
All employees, including managers and supervisors, are
responsible for complying with safe and healthful work practices.
All employees are responsible for complying with safety rules,
policies and procedures.
3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement
Each employee has a responsibility to ensure that work is
performed in a safe manner. Employees shall report violations
of safety rules and policies in accordance with established
District procedures.
3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions
Employees who violate safety rules, policies and procedures are
subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.
Discipline shall be implemented in accordance with established
District policies, and bargaining unit MOUs where appropriate.
Supervision and management shall be responsible for
disciplining workers for failure to comply with safe and healthful
work practices.
3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations
All accidents and near misses shall be investigated promptly.
Accident and incident investigation shall be conducted in
accordance with Safety-POL-202, Accident Investigation and
Reporting.
3.8 Recordkeeping
Records shall be maintained in accordance with specific Cal-
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13102 16 of 28
g:\wp.dta\hr%50\sh8red documents\safety policies-sops-formOnal-safety policies\safety-pol-101 injury
and illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
OSHA requirements. Records not mentioned below are
maintained in accordance with specific policies and procedures.
3.8.1 Inspection Records
Records of safety inspections shall be kept 12 months after the
last item found deficient has been corrected. Copies of safety
inspections shall be kept in the Safety Office at Plant No. 1.
3.8.2 Training Records
Employee safety training records shall be maintained in Training
Server, an electronic database. These records are retained for
the length of district employment, plus five(5)years.
3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records
Exposure monitoring and medical records shall be retained in
accordance with Safety-POL-405, Access to Employee Medical
Records and Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204.
Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records.
3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives
One goal of the Districts safety and health program is to ensure
that safety programs are not in conflict with one another. A
second goal is to ensure that the Districts overall mission can be
accomplished while providing a safe and healthful work
environment and achieving overall compliance with all applicable
regulations and laws.
3.10 Coordination of Contractor Programs
The District requires all contractors that conduct business with
the District to have a safety program in place and conform to
District, state and federal requirements. Requirements for
contractors maybe found in Safety-POL-108, Contractor Safety
Programs.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113102 17 of 28
Odocuments and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary Internet fileftik10\safety-pol-101 injury and
Illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFEMPOL-101
0
4. References
Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3203. Injury and Illness
Prevention Program
Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204. Access to
Employee Exposure and Medical Records
Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3340. Accident
Prevention Signs
California Labor Code, Sections 142.3, 4558 and 6401.7
California Government Code, Section 11346.
California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Division 1, Department of
Industrial Relations
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous
Waste Management
SAFETY-SOP-000.1, Control of Polices, Procedures, Programs
SAFETY-SOP-000.7, Safety Committees
SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspections
SAFETY-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority
SAFETY-SOP-101.3, Pre-Use Analysis
SAFETY-SOP-102.8, Employee Procured Personal Protective
Equipment
SAFETY-POL-102, Personal Protective Equipment
SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE)
Bulletins
SAFETY-POL-104, Permit Required Confined Spaces
SAFETY-POL-105, Hazardous Energy Control
SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation
SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs
SAFETY-POL-109, Respiratory Protection Program
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113IO2 18 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary intemet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
SAFETY-POL-110, Radiation Safety Program
SAFETY-POL-111, Chemical Hygiene Plan
SAFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Program
SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure to Pathogens Program
SAFETY-POL-201, Fire Prevention
SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting
SAFETY-POL-203, Ergonomics
SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection
SAFETY-POL-205, Electrical Safety
SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety Operations (including carts
and bicycles)
SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety
SAFETY-POL-303, Crane Safety
SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation
SAFETY-POI- 401, Medical Examinations
5. Attachments
Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site
Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 19 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary internet fi1es\o1k10\safety-pot-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
e
Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site
1. After logging into the District's computer network, open the Internet by placing the
cursor over the Internet Explorer" icon and double dick with the left button on the
mouse.
2. Once the Internet Explorer has opened on the home page, type "WIN" into the
Internet browser box. Push the "Enter" key.
3. Using the mouse, move the cursor over the"Departments" button, double click on
the button.
4. Using the mouse, move the cursor over the "650 Safety' button. Double dick on the
button.
5. Select the specific topic you wish to view by placing the cursor over the topic and
double clicking on the button.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is uncontrolled
Date 211 3/02 20 of 28
cAdocuments and settingsUryle\local settings\temporary internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY.POL-1o1
Y
Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs
Contents
1. Purpose............................................................................................. 22
2. Requirements ................................................................................... 22
2.1 Written Compliance Programs.........................................................................22
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13102 21 of 28
cAdocuments and sa ingftyleklocal settings\temporary Internet files\olk101safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
e
1 . Purpose
To promote a safe work environment for all employees and to
ensure the District meets the safety-related legal requirements
for written compliance programs.
2. Requirements
It is the District's policy to provide a safe work environment for its
employees. The District is committed to ensuring compliance
with all safety-related legal requirements and providing the
necessary training to meet these requirements.
2.1 Written Compliance Programs
The written compliance programs, which are detailed in specific
Safety Policies, Procedures or Safety Programs (SPs), covered
by this policy are:
1. Injury and Illness Prevention Program
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Tjtle8, §3203,
Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of
this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-
101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program and SAFETY-
SP-1 0 1 District Safety and Health Program. The program
includes information on safety commitment and
responsibilities, hazard recognition, hazard assessment and
control, safety communications, safety training, accident
reporting and investigation, safety committees, and
recordkeeping.
2. Personal Protective Equipment
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 3380, Personal
Protective Devices. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed SAFETY-POL-102 Personal
Protective Equipment. This program includes the
requirements for selection, use, and care for devices
designed for head, eye, body, hand, and foot protection.
Rev.A Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 1/30101 22 of 28
c:Wocuments and setgngsXWe\local settings\temporary intemet files\olk101safety-poi-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
v
3. Safety Awareness For Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins
4. SAFE bulletins are bulletins issued on specific safety related
items explaining how something should be done, or
explaining how specific components of a safety program are
to be implemented. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered
District policy for items not covered by specific policies.
SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years.
SAFE Bulletins older than 3 years old shall not be
considered District policy. The policy for the development of
SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFETY-POL-103, Safety
Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins
5. Permit Required Confined Spaces
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, §
5157, Permit-Required Confined Spaces. To meet the intent
of the regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-
104, Permit Required Confined Spaces and SAFETY-SP-
104 Permit Required Confined Spaces. This program
includes the requirements for the entrant, attendant, entry
supervisor, and rescue team for confined space entry
activities.
6. Hazardous Energy Control
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, §
3314 Cleaning, Repairing, Servicing and Adjusting Prime
Movers, Machinery and Equipment. To meet the intent of
this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-
105, Hazardous Energy Control Programs and SAFETY-SP-
105 Hazardous Energy Control. This program includes the
requirements for working on or around equipment that is
energized or has the potential to contain residual energy.
7. Hearing Conservation
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, §
5097, Hearing Conservation. To meet the intent of this
regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-106,
Hearing Conservation Programs and SAFETY-SP-106
Hearing Conservation. This program includes the
requirements for designating areas where hearing protection
is required and the selection, use, and care for hearing
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113/02 23 of 28
cAdocuments and settings\kyleklocal settings\temporary intemet flies\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-PM-101
e
protection devices.
8. Integrated Emergency Response Program
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, §
3220 Emergency Action Plan, §3221 Fire Prevention Plan,
§ Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response;
CCR Tide 19. § 2620 at seq. and Health and Safety Code §
25500 at seq. Minimum Standards for Business, § 2400 at
seq. Standardized Emergency Management Systems; Title
22, § 66265.30 through 37, Preparedness and Prevention
Plan, § 66265.50 through 56, Contingency Plan and
Emergency Procedures; 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 112, Spill Prevention Control and
Countermeasure Plan. To meet the intent of all the
regulations, the District has developed Safety-POL-112,
Integrated Emergency Response Plan and Safety-SP-112
Integrated Emergency Response Plan. This plan is divided
into Volumes I and ll. Volume I, Emergency Preparedness,
contains the specific plans for preparing for an emergency.
Volume II, Emergency Procedures, contains the specific
plans and procedures to be implemented in response to an
emergency.
9. DOT Substance Abuse and Alcohol Misuse
This program is mandated by DOT 49 CFR, Chapter III, Part
382, Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing.
To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has
developed Safety-SP-107 DOT Substance Abuse and
Alcohol Misuse Program. This program includes the
requirements for all District employees required to maintain
a commercial drivers license as part of their job
responsibilities. The program includes the requirements for
training, driver conduct, prohibition, handling of test results
and record retention, consequences of testing positive and
use-related conduct, and confidentiality.
10. Respiratory Protection
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, §
5144, Respiratory Protection. To meet the intent of this
regulation, the District has developed Safety-POL-109
Respiratory Protection Program. This program includes the
duties of the program administrator, supervisor, and
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13IO2 24 of 28
0documents and settingskWe\local settingsUemporary intemel files\olklo\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101
0
respiratory user. Also defined in the program are the
requirements for the selection, inspection, use,
maintenance, and storage of respiratory protection devices.
9. Radiation Safety Program
This program is mandated by CCR Tide 17, Division 1,
Chapter 5, Subchapter 4, Radiation and Cal-OSHA Title 8, §
5076, Radiation and Radioactivity, Administrative
Procedures. To meet the intent of the regulation, the District
has developed Safety-POL-110 Radiation Safety Program.
This program includes the requirements for nuclear gauge
users, contractors, service representatives, and visitors who
enter into restricted areas where radioactive materials are
used or stored.
10. Chemical Hygiene Plan
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5191,
Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in
Laboratories. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed Safety-POL-111 Chemical Hygiene
Plan and Appendix B of the Laboratory Operating Procedures
Manual. This program includes the duties of the Chemical
Hygiene Officer, supervisor, and laboratory employee.
11. Exposure to Pathogens Program(Bloodbome Pathogens)
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5193, Bloodbome
Pathogens for our Emergency Medical Team. Other aspects
of the program are voluntary, but follow best industry
practices. To meet the intent of the regulation referenced
above, the District has developed Safety-POL-113 Exposure
to Pathogens and Safety-SOP-113-1 Exposure Control Plan.
12. Hazard Communication Program
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5194, Hazard
Communication. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed Safety-POL-501, Hazard
Communication. This program includes the requirements for
training, use, labeling, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
and employee training and education.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2/13/02 25 of 28
c:\documents and settings\kyle\local settings\temporary internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401
13. Contractor Safety Programs
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Subchapter 4, Construction
Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed Safety-POL-108, Contractor Safety
Programs. This program includes the requirements for
Contractor oversight for safety and health related issues by
the District during the completion of contracts.
14. Fire Prevention Programs
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§) 3220, Emergency
Action Plan, 3221, Fire Prevention Plan and 6150-6184, Fire
Protection. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District
has developed Safety-POL-201 Fire Prevention. This
program includes the requirements for the training of
employees on evacuations, and fire systems maintenance,
testing and upkeep.
15. Ergonomics
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5110, Ergonomics.
To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has
developed Safety-POL-203 Ergonomics. This program
includes the requirements for evaluation of workstations, the
selection, use, and care for devices designed to reduce
hazards in the work place that can lead to repetitive motion
and cumulative trauma injuries.
16. Fall Protection
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 4,
Construction Safety Orders and Subchapter 7, General
Industry Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation,
the District has developed Safety-POL-204, Fall Protection.
This program includes the requirements for use of fixed,
portable and personal fall protection equipment.
17. Electrical Safety
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§)2299-2974, Electrical
Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2M 3IO2 26 of 26
c:\documents and seftingsUryleVocal settings\temporary internet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevenlion.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL•101
Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed Safety-POL-205 Electrical Safety.
This program includes the requirements for electrical
installations,work practices when working on electrical
equipment and the required personal protective equipment.
18. Vehicle Safety
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general
requirement of the District's Injury and Illness Prevention
Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District
has developed Safety-POL-301, Vehicle Safety. This
program includes the requirements for vehicle inspection,
vehicle maintenance and driver surveillance.
19. Marine Safety
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general
requirement of the District's Injury and Illness Prevention
Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District
has developed Safety-POL-302, Marine Safety.
20. Crane Safety
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 7, Group
13, Cranes and Other Hoisting Equipment. To meet the
intent of this regulation, the District has developed Safety-
POL-303, Crane Safety. This program includes the
requirements for training of personnel, inspection and
maintenance of cranes.
21. Forklifts
This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Article 25, Industrial Trucks. To
meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed
Safety-POL-304, Forklift Operation. This program includes
the requirements for training of personnel, inspection and
maintenance of forklifts.
22. Medical Programs
This program is mandated by several different Cal-OSHA
standards in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8,
Chapter 4, subchapter 7, General Industry Safety Orders.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113/02 27 of 28
cAdocuments and settings\kyleVocal settings\temporary internet files\olkl Msafety-pol-101 injury and
illness prevention.doc
Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 !�
To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has
developed Safety-POL401, Medical Examinations. This
program includes the requirements for conducting medical
surveillance on employees exposed to potentially hazardous
work environments.
23. Hazardous Waste Management
This program is mandated by Cal-EPA, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous Waste
Management. To meet the intent of this regulation, the
District has developed Safety-POL-502 Hazardous
Substance Management. This program includes the
requirements for identification, packaging, labeling and
disposal of hazardous waste. Requirements for training
employees are also included.
Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled
Date 2113102 28 of 28
cAdocuments and settings\kyleVocal settings\temporary intemet files\olk10\safety-pol-101 Injury and
illness preven8on.doc
FAHR COMMITTEE me2/1302 TOaE.Or Dir.
02/13/02 02/27rD
Number
AGENDA REPORT FAH Number I[em (h)
_ Item NUmb 15 h
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources
Originator: Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager
SUBJECT: CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT— SAFETY DIVISION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-06, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending
Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for immediate
reinstatement of a Safety Supervisor classification at pay range El ($65,164-$92,192).
SUMMARY
From time to time, adjustments need to be made to classification structures as new
duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the organization.
Staff has identified an adjustment that must be made to the classification structure of
the Safety Division due to recent events including a division vacancy, reorganization
and regulatory inspection. The safety division has been moved into the Human
Resources & Employee Development Department. Currently the District is utilizing an
acting supervisor to provide day-to-day supervision at the operational level for staff and
safety programs.
Management oversight for the Safety Division is being provided by the existing HR
Manager; therefore, the vacant Safety & Emergency Response Manager position at pay
range El ($71,901-$101,687)will not be filled. The Safety Supervisor classification
will be reinstated at pay range E11 ($65,164-$92,192).
The Safety Supervisor classification was included in the staffing plan until FY 1997/98,
at which time division management deleted it from the classification plan. Appropriate
maintenance of the plan would have called for inactivating the classification instead of
deleting it. This classification has been approved by the FAHR committee to be
reinstated through the Classification and Compensation Study. We are requesting that
the FAHR committee approve the reinstatement of this classification immediately prior
to the full implementation of the study due to the critical need of the position.
By reinstating this classification, the District will achieve overall alignment in the
implementation and administration of safety programs, as well as a greater degree of
regulatory compliance. Additionally, organizational support for the District's safety
program will be reinforced. The classification was slotted at the same range as the
Human Resources Supervisor classification. Please see the attached classification
specification, Attachment 1.
Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the
proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 2.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
NIA
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. OCSD 02-06
2. Safety Supervisor classification specification.
3. Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule.
C:\Documenls and SetbngsUryle\Local SBWngs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK10Wgenda Report Fab 02 Safe Supv C1aw.dOL
Giw EIa,aondareand Agenda ReWSM02 Beard Agenda Repar6NIDNter,15N.SafsdYSugvdoc
R..0 012M Page 2
4
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-06
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AMENDING THE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1: That Exhibit W of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended
by amending Policy No. C10.10, Classification and Compensation (salary schedule), set
forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: That ail other terms and conditions of Resolution No. 98-33, as
previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be
made by Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 27, 2002.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code:
e FLSA Status:
CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:
Effective Date:
CLASS TITLE: SAFETY SUPERVISOR PAGE: 1
Class specifications are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the
class. Specifications are not intended to refect all duties performed within the job.
DEFINITION
Under general direction, supervises, assigns,reviews,and participates in the work of staff responsible for
safety, health, workers compensation, and emergency preparedness response program services;
participates in the development,implementation and administration of programs,policies and procedures;
ensures work quality and adherence to established policies and procedures; and performs the more
technical and complex tasks relative to assigned area of responsibility.
REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES
The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or
may be required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and
changing business practices.
1. Plan, prioritize, assign, supervise,review, and participate in the work of staff responsible for safety,
health,workers compensation,and emergency preparedness response programs and services.
2. Establish schedules and methods for providing safety,health,workers compensation, and emergency
preparedness response services; identify resource needs; review needs with appropriate management
staff; allocate resources accordingly.
3. Participate in the development of policies and procedures; monitor work activities to ensure
compliance with established policies and procedures; make recommendations for changes and
improvements to existing standards and procedures.
4. Recommend and assist in the implementation of goals and objectives; implement approved policies
and procedures.
5. Participate in the selection of safety staff; provide or coordinate staff training; work with employees
to correct deficiencies; implement discipline procedures.
6. Participate in the preparation and administration of the department budget; submit budget
recommendations;monitor expenditures.
7. Review current and proposed regulatory requirements to determine impact on the District; provide
feedback to the regulatory agencies as appropriate.
8. Participate in overseeing the development and delivery of training programs in support of divisional
goals; audit programs and standards to ensure continued compliance from a performance and
administrative standpoint;recommend and implement changes as appropriate.
9. Participate in developing and overseeing the implementation of the emergency response program; as
necessary,serve as incident commander in the event of an emergency.
I
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .lob Code:
FLSA Status: I
CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:
Effective Date:
CLASS TITLE: SAFETY SUPERVISOR PAGE: 2
10. Participate in overseeing accident and incident investigations including notification of appropriate
personnel;review accident and incident records;identify trends;make recommendations.
11. Participate in overseeing the Workers' Compensation program; monitor claim activity; interface with
appropriate parties for claim resolution; facilitate claimants return to work make recommendations
for restricted work activities; maintain appropriate records including medical records and OSHA
information.
12. Recommend acceptable personal protective equipment and safety equipment for use by District
personnel; meet with vendors to source and evaluate equipment.
13. Oversee and participate in the development of policies and procedures for storage, handling and
disposal of hazardous substances and wastes,waste minimization,and pollution control.
14. Prepare analytical and statistical reports on operations and activities.
15. Attend and participate in professional group meetings; stay abreast of new trends and innovations in
the field of safety and emergency response.
16. Perform related duties as required.
QUALIFICATIONS
The following generally describes the knowledge and ability required to enter the job and/or be learned within a
short period oftime in order w successfully perform the assigned duties.
Knowledee of•
Operations, services, and activities of a safety, health, workers compensation, and emergency
preparedness response program.
Principles of supervision,training,and performance evaluation.
Principles and practices of safety, industrial hygiene, environmental engineering, workers
compensation,and emergency preparedness response.
Principles and procedures used in the proper handling of chemicals and hazardous waste.
Rules, regulations, policies and procedures governing workplace safety including OSIIA/Cal-OSHA
standards.
Principles and practices of regulatory compliance.
Methods and techniques of developing and conducting safety training programs.
Principles and procedures of record keeping and report writing.
Occupational hazards and standard safety practices.
Principles of budget preparation and control.
Principles and practices of fiscal,statistical,and administrative research and report preparation.
Office procedures,methods and equipment including computers and applicable software applications
such as word processing,spreadsheets,and databases.
Pertinent federal,state,and local laws,codes,and regulations.
ORANGE COUNTY SANIT==DISTRICTJob Code:
FLSA Status:
CLASS SPECIFIBargaining Unit:
Effective Date:
CLASS TITLE: SAFETY SUPERVISOR PAGE: 3
Ability to:
Supervise,organize,and review the work of lower level staff.
Selev4 supervise,train,and evaluate staff.
Understand the organization, operation, and services of the District and of outside agencies as
necessary to assume assigned responsibilities.
Interpret and apply administrative and departmental policies and procedures.
Interpret and apply applicable federal,state,and local laws,codes,and regulations.
Develop and coordinate safety training programs in assigned area.
Investigate accidents and unsafe working conditions and provide recommendations to prevent
reoccurrence.
Ensure compliance with appropriate safety practices and regulations.
Assess safety training needs and develop appropriate programs.
Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of safety programs.
Effectively represent the department to outside individuals and agencies to accomplish the goals and
objectives of the unit.
Compile data, maintain records and files, and participate in the preparation of clear and concise
reports.
Operate office equipment including computers and supporting word processing, spreadsheet, and
database applications.
Interpret and explain District policies and procedures.
Prepare clear and concise reports.
Communicate clearly and concisely,both orally and in writing.
Establish and maintain effective wonting relationships with those contacted in the course of work
Education and Experience Guidelines -Any combination of education and experience that would likely
provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities
would be:
Education/Trainine:
Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course
work in Safety,Industrial Hygiene,Environmental Engineering or a related field.
Experience:
Six years of safety,industrial hygiene or environmental engineering experience including two
year;of lead supervisory responsibility.
License or Certificate:
Possession of,or ability to obtain,an appropriate,valid driver's license.
Depending on area of assignment, specialized certification, such as First Responder Operational
and/or incident Commander/Scene Manager for HAZMAT.
Certification as a safety professional or industrial hygienist.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .fob Code:
FLSA Status:
CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:
Effective Date:
CLASS TITLE: SAFETY SUPERVISOR PAGE: 4
PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORIUNG ENVIRONMENT
The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the
essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to
perform the essential Job functions.
Environment: Office and field environment with some travel to different sites; exposure to all types
of weather and temperature conditions; noise, dust, grease, smoke, fumes, noxious odors, and gases;
potentially hazardous chemicals.
Physical: Incumbents require sufficient mobility to work in an office setting and operate office
equipment; to travel to various locations to perform inspections, conduct training and investigate
accidents;primary functions may require incumbents to maintain physical conditioning necessary for
walking or standing, bend, stoop, kneel and crawl; climb stain, ladders and inclines; operate
motorized vehicles; operate office equipment including use of computer keyboard; speak in public;
verbally communicate to exchange information; requires the wearing of hard hats, safety glasses or
goggles,ear plugs or muffs,wearing of respirators,rubber or plastic gloves, safety shoes,and rubber
boots. _
Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction; vision sufficient to read small
print, computer screens and other printed documents; specific vision abilities required by this job
include close, distance, and peripheral vision, color perception, depth perception, and the ability to
adjust focus.
Hearin:Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction.
Date:January,2002
Johnson&Associates
Orange county sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Supervisory
Pay Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual
Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
E14 36.243 6282 $75.385 51.294 8,891 $106,692 Engineering SupeMsm Exempt
E13 34.568 5,992 $71.901 48.888 8.474 $101.687 Ernoonmental Management Supervisor Exempt
E12 32.932 5,708 $68,499 46.590 8,076 $96,907 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt
Ell 31.329 5,430 $65,164 44.323 7.683 $92.192 Samar Operations Su sMsor Exempt
Ell 31.329 5,430 $65,164 44.323 7.683 $92,192 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
Ell 31.329 5,430 $65,164 44.323 7,683 $92,192 Information Technology Supowlsor Exempt
Ell 31.329 5,430 565,164 44.323 7,683 $92,192 Contracts S Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
E77 1 31.329 1 5.430 1 $65.164 44.323 1 7.683 1 $92,192 Accounting Supervisor Exempt
Ell, 31.329 '. SAO $95,194 li '4415111 7,6BY - , c$93'd92{' Bill$ Suplinileor 'Bit6111 '
E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6.977 $83,720 Maintenance Su erAwr Exem i
E9 28.432 4.928 $59.139 40,250 6,977 $83,720 Operations Supervisor Exam t
E9 28.432 4.928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 IN 20 Source Conlml SupeMsor Exem i
E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 8,977 $83,720 Su Msin Construction Inspector Exempt
E9 28.032 4,B28 E59,139 10.250 6,977 $83.720 Warehouse Supervsof Exempt
Hourly I
i �
501 NE SE
Pay Hourly Hourly Pay Hourly Hourly Pay Hourly Hourly
Range Minimum Maximum Range Minimum Maximum Range Minimum Maximum
2015 24.841 30.935 NE09 24.992 35.092 SE27 83.558 83.558
2014 23.524 29.288 NE08 22.854 32.097 SE20
2013 22.726 28.300 NE07 21.575 30.303 SE19 44.895 72.092
2012 21.966 27.350 NE06 19.637 27.589 SE18 44283 71.822
2011 20.648 25.715 NE05 18.464 25.889 SE17 39.074 61. 887
2010 20.509 25.538 NE04 17240 24218 SE16 40.007 56.555
2009 19.952 24.841 NE03 16.143 22.618 SE15 38.089 53.875
2008 1 19.825 24.677 NE02 15.199 21.315 ISE14 36.2431 51.294
2007 18.128 22.574 NE01 11,859 16.593 SE13 34.568 48.888
2006 17.646 21.966 NEW 9.000 16.000 SE12 32.932 46.590
2005 16.468 20.509 SE11 31.329 44.323
2004 16.253 20.231 SE10 29.792 42.201
2003 15.695 19.546 SE09 28.432 40.250
2002 15.493 19.280 SE08 27.039 38.261
2001 12.706 15.809 SE07 25.785 36.486
2000 12.022 14.973 SE06 24.537 34.706
SE05 23.380 33.070
SE04 22.271 31.539
SE03 21.185 30.004
I SE02 20.214 28.576
SE01 1 19.2031 27.249
Page 1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To.ard
021 71oz
AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number
16
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Mark Esquer, Process Engineering
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENTS WITH SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF DISTRICT
GENERATED EXCESS ELECTRICITY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the General Manager to execute contract amendments to the existing "As
Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreements" with Southern Califomia
Edison, as follows, providing for the method of payment by Edison of money awned to
the District for power sold to Edison from November 2000 through March 2001, in a
form approved by General Counsel:
• Amendment No. 1 To Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1
To Power Purchase Agreement—QFID 2640 (for Plant 1), including Conditional
Release and Waiver
• Amendment No. 1 To Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1
To Power Purchase Agreement—QFID 1098 (for Plant 2), including Conditional
Release and Waiver
SUMMARY
Purpose
➢ The purpose of this report is to request Board approval for amendments to the
existing contracts with Southern California Edison (SCE)for the purchase and sale
of District generated excess electricity. This electricity is generated from the District's
Central Generation Facilities at both Plant Nos. 1 & 2. These are deemed to be
Qualified Facilities ("QF").
➢ The proposals provide the payment method for Southern California Edison to repay
the money owed for past power exported from the District's two treatment plants. of
have the following advantages:
Background
➢ The District has 30-year contracts with SCE for its purchase of excess power from
the District's Central Generation Facilities.
➢ From November 1, 2000 to March 26, 2001 Edison suspended payments to small
power producers for the power they provided to SCE and during this period the
District exported and sold power to SCE that was worth approximately$118,000.
G Iy.Eb, gend.%B MAgen"Rey =2 Boats Awda Reryes=0811em19.SLE Em
➢ Because of the energy crisis the PUC asked the utilities to negotiate separate
payment agreements with the small producers.
➢ The Board approved the Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1
on August 22, 2001. However the repayment plan in the agreement was predicated
on Edison receiving permission from the Public Utilities Board to borrow the funds to
repay the debt owed to the power producers. This permission was never given.
➢ After reviewing the new proposal, staff and General Counsel agreed it was
acceptable and sent SCE a letter committing to take the offer to the Board for
consideration. See attached letter to SCE from General Counsel dated February S,
2002.
Proposal
D The two "amendments" stipulate the manner that payments will be made now that
Edison has been granted the right to use part of their income from electric rates to
repay their debt.
➢ The agreements require Edison to pay the District in direct proportion to the way
they pay their other creditors. In other words, if Edison has paid 5% of their total
current debt, they will have had to pay the District 5%.
Summary
D The payment formula proposed is better than the one currently in effect.
D The pricing resulting from the new formula will allow the District to export power
without incurring financial loss.
➢ The offer provides for immediate recovery of some of the debt and for interest
payments on the remainder.
➢ The offer provides the flexibility to move to another formula in the future, if it is
advantageous to the District.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total revenues from sales of power for FY 2000/01 was $451,000 including the
amount still owed by Edison. The revenue for FY200101 was similar to previous years.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
G\p.MaapmEa�NRgenN Re .2 BwN AgerAafieNna`03UNem16 YE M[
y
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
➢ Stay with the current power purchase contract and have no agreement with Edison
for repayment of the debt.
CEQA FINDINGS
➢ None Required
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letterto SCE from General Counsel dated February 8, 2001
w d.%emae�M Mrtacwv a M Wnrnmsezazaremie.sceax
"W OMM OF
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PROFMIONALCOMMnON
701 SOUTH PARKER STREET,SUITE 8000•GRANGE,CA 928664760 B(714)558-70N•FAX(714)805-7787
DIRECT DIAL'. (714)564-2642
EMAIL:DCN®4VSS LAW.COM
February 8, 2002
Mr. Cliff M. Webb
QF Resources
Southern California Edison Company
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Suite 495
Rosemead, CA 91770
Re: Proposed Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of
Amendment No. 1 to Purchased Power Agreement Between Edison and
Orange County Sanitation District, Agreement Nos. QFID No. 1098
Dear Mr. Webb:
As you know, this office serves as General Counsel to the Orange County
Sanitation District, and on behalf of our client, we acknowledge receipt of the proposed
Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement Amendment as described above, prepared
specifically for the District.
The Orange County Sanitation District is a public agency, governed by a Board
of Directors of elected public officials. The authority to execute this Agreement
Amendment can only be granted by affirmative action of that Board. The Board is
unable to convene until February 27, 2002, at which date, we would expect the Board of
Directors to consider and take action on the proposed Agreement Amendment.
This will advise you that based upon our review of the Agreement Amendment
and the related information, staff and this office will recommend that the Board of
Directors approve the Agreement Amendment.
It would be reasonable to expect that the District Board of Directors would accept
and act favorably upon the recommendation of staff and the Office of General Counsel,
to approve these Agreements. Nevertheless, it must be pointed out that the Board of
Directors is not required to follow the recommendations of its staff and/or legal counsel.
The Board of Directors has complete discretion in whether it will accept the staff
recommendation and approve the Agreement Amendment. The Board of Directors may
also approve the recommendation subject to the negotiation of additional or modified
terms or even reject the recommendation and deny the Agreement Amendment.
TERRY C.ANWUS•SIFPHEN 7.NEATON•M WIS BOBAR R JONN E CAVA I)DH•CMIGO FARRWDD,•JOSEPH W.FORBAM
BRADIEVRNOW!•DOIIQ.ASC.HO4MID•WMETFFmt6Y•ROBMTAARRAUS •MAWAIPJ WNA-WWR
IUIg Mcg.OSKEY�1NOMASF.NIXON•BARBAMRASFANU �IASONE RESMCIL•OMARSANDOVAL•IOIRJ 0.9WW
GItEGORV ESPTOMAN�KFNNARD0.SMART,JR•DANDi KSPMOUN�LTUM AIMOFAWOOD•11R1MAS L WOODRUFF
Mr. Cliff M. Webb
Southern California Edison Company
February 8, 2002
Page 2
If you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to give us a call.
Very truly yours,
WOODRUFF, RADLIN & SMART
A Profess' Corporal on
G/ I
DOUGLAS'C. HOLLAND `
cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson
Mr. R.J. Ooten
Mr. M. Esquer
1-Mr. D. Halverson
Ms. P. Kyle
147602\1
BOARD COMMITTEE MeeWxi Date To ad.Of Dr.
021nio2
AGENDA REPORT ran Numbe tenN17
v
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer
SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS,
JOB NO. J-39
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve plans and specifications for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Ouffalls,
Job No. J-39, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1
to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation;
and (4)Award a contract to Connolly-Pacific Company for Investigation and Repair of
Ocean Ouffalls, Job No. J-39,for an amount not to exceed $4,873,000.
SUMMARY
• Placement of additional larger rock along approximately one mile of the 120-inch ocean
ouffall is needed in order to bring the existing structure up to current engineering standards.
• Job No.J-39 will re-rock approximately one mile of the 12D-inch ouffall, repair the 120-inch
ouffall scour pad, and repair some minor undercutting on the 78-inch ouffall.
• The plans and specifications were completed by Carollo Engineers in December 2001.
Sealed bids were received on January 22, 2002. Summary information on the budget and
bids are as follows:
Project Budget $16.907,000
Construction Budget $11,367,000
Engineer's Estimate $11.000,000
Low Responsive Bid $ 4,873,000
High Bid $ 8,760,000
Number of Bids 3
• Orange County Sanitation District(District)staff and Carollo Engineers staff have completed
a review of the three bids submitted on January 22, 2002 and found them to be complete,
responsive, and competitive.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total budget for this project is $16,907,000. The money for this project was approved by the
District's Board of Directors through a budget amendment at the August 23, 2000 Board
Meeting.
Authorization of$4,873,000 for the construction contract is being requested. Please refer to the
attached Budget Information Table for more information.
•w..• 1� Pagel
7
BUDGET IMPACT
Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 Page 86)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted for FY01-02.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
The District's Strategic Plan places special emphasis on use of the existing 120-inch ocean
ouffall. All disposal alternatives developed in the Strategic Plan rely on the 120-inch ocean
outfall as the primary means to discharge treated wastewater flows through 2020.
Consequently, the existing 120-inch ocean outfall must provide the highest degree of reliability
possible.
Where the outfall lies on the ocean floor, it is held in place and protected from wave action and
currents by a rock ballast protective cap. Based on recent engineering analyses, over the next
five years, there is a one-in-four chance that the existing outfall ballast could be significantly
affected by large waves generated by storms. Rock ballast is the only protection preventing
movement, undermining, and the potential failure of the outfall.
The District has implemented an agency notification plan for this maintenance effort, and was
noted by the following three agencies that permits would be necessary for this maintenance
project:
• United States Army Corp of Engineers
• California Coastal Commission
• California Regional Water Quality Control Board
The District has applied for the required permits, and will comply with all requirements during
the construction of this maintenance project.
Schedule
• The placement of Ballast rock will begin in July and Construction will conclude in December,
2002.
ALTERNATIVES
Physical wave tank modeling has confirmed the need of this project to bring the District's
120-inch ocean outfall structure up to current engineering design standards. Alternatives to this
re-ballast project would expose the District to an unacceptable level of risk.
�Wl ,eras Page 2
0
CEQA FINDINGS
In accordance with Section 15302 of Mice 19 of the California Environmental Quality Act, this
project is categorically exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. A Notice
of Exemption was filed at the County Clerk's Office in October 2001. -
Section 15302, states in part, "Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing
structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure
replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced."
The District's Environmental Consultant, Kris Lindstrom, has reviewed the Scope of Work for
this project, and concurs with the determination made by District staff.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Bid Tabulation
3. Bid Summary
CJH:sa:jo
GAS Ablagenda%oard Agenda Repans12002 Board Agenda Repods0202Wan 17.JJg.dm
a Ww vsse Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls
JOB NO. J-39
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 108,000 $ 109.000 $ - $ 109.000 $ 108.000 $ - $ 108.000 $ 108.000 100%
Sludies/PermiBin $ - $ 662,000 $ - $ 662,000 $ - $ - $ - $
Consultant PSA $ 414,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 966.891 $ $ 966,891 $ 770,000 80%
Design Staff $ 253,000 $ 362,000 $ - $ 362,000 $ 294,000 $ - $ 294,000 $ 154,000 52%
Construction Contract $ 450,000 $ 11,367,000 $ - $11,367,000 $ 88,407 $ 4873000 $ 4,961,407 $ 88,407 2%
Construction
Administration $ - $ 540,000 $ - $ 540,000 $ - $ - $ - $
Construction
Inspection $ - $ 667.000 $ - $ 667,000 S 24,000 $ $ 24,000 $ 24,000 100%
Contingency $ - $ 2.000.000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $
PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,225.000 $16.907.000 $ - S 16u 107.000 5 1,481,298 $ 4,873,000 $ 6,354,298 $ 1,144,407 18%
Reimbursable Costs
PROJECT NET 1 $ 1,225,000 1 $ 16,907,000 $ - $ 16 907.000 S 1,481,298 1 $ 4,873.000 1 $ 6,354,298 1$ 1,144.407 18%
EDMSIO Cl.s90as srnplate,.bBW,Vaud9et Information Table(W3717999)
ti
January 22, 2002
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDUM NO.A
BID TABULATION
INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS
JOB NO. J-39
Engineer's Estimate: $11,000,000 Construction Contract Budget $11,367,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. CONNOLLY-PACIFIC CO. $ 4,873,000
2. TRAYLOR BROS., INC., dba TRAYLOR PACIFIC $ 4,887,000
3. MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO. $ '8,760,000
4. $
5. $
6. $
7. $
8. $
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid
is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to CONNOLLY-PACIFIC CO. in
the bid amount of$4,873,000 as the lowest and best bid.
'Corrected amount. Manson Construction correct total was $8,535,000.
David A. udwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
CAFdeNeWIPUJ9 SW Tab.dw
Revl%d 05119M
OCSD . P.O.eo. 6127 . Feenten VaAey,CA 927284127 . (774) 962-2411
BID SUMMARY
INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS
JOB NO. J-39
Traylor Bros., Inc.dba Traylor
Connoll -Pacific Co Pacific Manson Construction Co.
Item Approx.oy Una Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price Price Price
1 1 Lump Sum $ 90.000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 97,000.00 $ 97,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
2 1 Lump Sum $ 2,201,000.00 $ 2,201,000.00 $ 1,900,000.00 $ 1,900,000.00 $ 3,927,500.00 $ 3,927,500.00
3 1 Lump Sum $ 2.260.000.00 $ 2,260,000.00 $ 2,350,000.00 $ 2,350,000.00 $ 3,927,500.00 $ 3,927,500.00
4 1 Lump Sum $ 250.000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 310,000.00 $ 310,000.00 $ 270,000.00 $ 270,000.00
5 1 Lump Sum $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00
6 1 Lump Sum $ 10,000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
$ - 4.911.000.00 $ 4,867,000.00 $ 8,535,000.00
6(a) 1 Lump Sum $ 39,000.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 20.000.00 $ 225.000.00
$ 4,950,000.00 $ 4,887,000.00 $ 8,760,000.00
'Add(+)or Delete(-) $ (77,000.00) $ - $
YOlhl ."" ""14� $ 4,873,000.00 $ 4.887.000.00 $ 8,760,000.00
Traylor Bros., Inc. dba Traylor
Connolly-Pacific Cc Pacific Manson Construction Co.
'Corrected amount from$8,535,000
1 of 1 1/23/02
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
January 14, 2002, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment
System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on January 14,
2002. Members of the Committee present were:
OCSD Directors OCWD Directors
Norm Eckenrode,Vice-Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman
Russell Patterson Phil Anthony
Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Larry Kraemer Jr.
Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1
Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Staff: Directors: Kalil Bum-Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille
Jim Herberg Wes Bannister —Camp Dresser& McKee
David Ludwin Jan Debay Annette McCluskey— NCG Porter Novelli
Lisa Murphy Staff: Debra Burris — DDB Engineering
Wendy Sevenandt William R. Mills Jr. Ted Popowchak—CH2M Hill
Counsel: Steven Conklin Tomas Dornbush, Bill Butler, Mark Biggers,
Brad Hogin Andrew Czorny Abdul Rashidi, Harold Glaser
Joanne Daugherty — Montgomery Watson Harza
Tom Dawes Jim Vickers— Separation Processes, Inc.
Shivaji Deshmukh John Collins— City of Fountain Valley
Bill Everest George Martin —City of Anaheim
Jill Everhart Richard Bell, Greg Heiertz— IRWD
Jenny Glasser Terry Lane— City of Garden Grove
Clark Ida Thom Coughran —City of Santa Ana
John Kennedy Steve Tedesco—Tetra Tech
Mike Markus Isaac Kos-Read —Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.
Mehul Patel Bill Tappan — Parsons
Lily Pham Tom Victor, Bob Zaiser—JBI
Laura Thomas Patrick Scanlon —Southern Calif. Water Co,
Ron Wildermuth Kris Lindstrom— K. P. Lindstrom, Inc.
Ron Linsky— NW RI
Director Eckenrode announced that Mr. Guy Carrozzo is no longer on the OCSD Board
and that a new alternate JCC member will soon be selected.
- 1 -
d'
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes o
January 14,2002
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of Meeting
Upon motion by Director Anthony seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the
minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held December 10, 2001 were
approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
2. Addendum No. 2 to the GWR System Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that Addendum No. 2 to the Final
Environmental Report (EIR) / Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that was certified
March 1999 is required to satisfy, requests for the $145 million loan application to the
State Water Resources Control Board. He recommended Addendum No. 2 be
approved and forwarded to the OCWD/OCSD Boards for their approval. He reported
that Addendum No. 2 is an appropriate action to take that includes minor changes in
the project and would not need to go through a full disclosure. He noted that the
SWRCB has reviewed and approved the addendum and that the addendum addressed
their concerns. He reported that there are no environmental changes and no changes
to the Final EIR/EIS, but the addendum does clarify a couple of issues such as the
mitigation monitoring plan, and it eliminated and condensed issues that are no longer
part of the project.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,
the Committee recommended approval by the OCWD/OCSD Boards as follows:
Approve Addendum No. 2 to Groundwater Replenishment System's EIR and find
that pursuant to California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines Section
15164 that some minor changes or additions to the 1999 EIR/EIS are necessary
but none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166
and/or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred that would require the
preparation of a Subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration.
3. Construction Management Services Contract
Mr. Dawes presented steps that have been taken to select the Construction
Management (CM)Team. He noted that the project is getting closer to construction
and that the bidding for major pipeline work, electrical and demolition will begin this
year. He noted that statements of qualifications were received from sic teams and that
in June 2001 the Committee took an action finding that the qualifications of these six
teams were adequate. He noted that Requests for Proposals that included a Scope of
Work, approved by the Committee, were sent to the six teams and five proposals were
- 2 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14, 2002
received. He noted the proposed CM team would be under the supervision of
Associate General Manager Mike Markus.
He reported that a Staff Selection Committee consisting of the following individuals was
formed to evaluate the five proposals received and that interviews with all five teams
were held in December: OCW D staff- Michael Markus, Committee Chair, John
Kennedy, Assistant General Manager, and Steve Conklin, Associate General Manager
and Director of Engineering; OCSD staff— David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, John
Linder, Construction Manager and Chris Cervellone, Assistant Construction Manager;
and Greg Heiertz, Engineering Director, representing the Irvine Ranch Water District
and the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee.
Mr. Dawes noted that no fee envelopes were opened until after the Staff Selection
Committee completed scoring and that the recommended team of Montgomery Watson
Harza had the lowest per hour price. He reported that the Staff Selection Committee
recommends the Montgomery Watson Harza team be awarded a Professional Services
Agreement in an amount not to exceed $10,993,038 for Construction Management
Services.
Mr. Dawes reported that the Consultant Selection Subcommittee consists of Directors
Anthony, Patterson, Anderson, Donahue, Bilodeau, and Greg Heiertz of IRWD and
Director Anthony noted that the Consultant Selection Subcommittee had not yet had an
opportunity to meet and review the staff recommendation.
Director Kraemer requested that the Consultant Selection Subcommittee consider two
options: 1) concur with staffs recommendation of Montgomery Watson Harza; or
2)that staff compare the CM team for$7 million versus $11 million for a consultant
team. Director Pickier concurred.
Director Bart expressed her concern about how the Subcommittee members not sitting
in on the interviews could make a decision of selection. Director Anthony stated he
attended one of the interviews, and Director Eckenrode stated he had attended four of
the interviews.
Director Franklin noted that Director Brady, not present at today's meeting, had
concems about Montgomery Watson Harza and requested to hear his comments.
Director Debay expressed her concerns of the following: 1) use of in-house staff versus
consultants for the CM team noting that it was good to have more eyes and technical
information and that use of a consultant gives a feeling of security with people that have
a broader sense of knowledge than in-house staff; 2) amount of money spent by the
consultants to prepare proposals; 3) asked for disclosures in compliance with the JCC
Communication Policy and 4) considers this subject so technical that she wondered if
the Consultant Selection Subcommittee has the kind of expertise to say yea or nay to
the recommendation of the technical staff.
- 3 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14, 2002
Director Pickier requested communication disclosures from the Committee. Director
Anderson stated that he has had no conversation with proposers, but has worked with
four of the proposed firms in the past and present and stated that he would be
abstaining from voting on this item.
Director Patterson expressed his concerns on in-house staff versus outside CM:
1) more employees would have to be hired; 2) questioned whether the RFP is exactly
the same for each; 3)when the project winds down, we would have the staff and no
work for them to do; 4) the outside CM would bring a much wider experience and
background for some of these tasks; and 5) stated that this issue is not just comparing
the price of$7 million to $11 million. He requested a breakdown of the staff estimate.
He reported that he would vote for an outside fine.
Director Pickier suggested that the Consultant Selection Subcommittee remain with the
staff recommendation of Montgomery Watson Harza unless someone can convince the
group of unknown pre-existing conditions.
Director Eckenrode stated he favored having "a second set of eyes" due to the
significance of the project, but his concern is to move ahead.
Director Pickier stated that he would add Directors Brady and Debay to the Consultant
Selection Subcommittee. Director Anderson stated that due to a possible conflict of
interest he would remove himself from the Subcommittee and that he did not sit in on
any of the interviews. Director Pickier then stated that the Subcommittee will consist of
Directors Anthony, Patterson, Donahue, Bilodeau, Debay, and Brady and that Director
Anderson would not be involved.
OCWD General Counsel Clark Ids requested that the Consultant Selection
Subcommittee be noticed as a meeting to ensure conformance with the "Brown Act".
Director Debay requested that the Staff Selection Committee sit in with the Consultant
Selection Subcommittee.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried,
with Director Anderson abstaining, the Committee deferred this matter to the next
JCC meeting and instructed the Consultant Selection Subcommittee to report
back to the JCC of their consideration for the following:
1) Selection of the Montgomery Watson Harza Team for Construction
Management Services;
2) Use of in-house staff for construction management.
4. Award of Contract No. GWRS-2001-2, Groundwater Replenishment System
Temporary Mobile Office Complex, to Oved Dagan Construction
Mr. Dawes reported that in September the Committee approved the temporary mobile
office complex contract and recommended that it go forward to both Boards to advertise
- 4 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14,20D2
for bids for construction and that the OCSD Board granted the OCWD Board the
authority to award the contract if the amount was less than $800,000, the engineer's
estimate. He reported that in December eight bids were received and that the lowest
bidder was Oved Dagan Construction for$783,990 for new trailers. Mr. Dawes
reported that staff recommends to OCWD Board award a contract to Oved Dagan
Construction, for$783,990 and approve Addendum No. 1 that was issued to clarify
contractors' questions and to state that prepayment to Southern California Edison
would be made by OCWD for electrical supply.
Mr. Dawes reported that a bid protest was filed by the second bidder, Brandell, against
the low bidder because they did not bid on an optional line item for used trailers. He
reported that the protest has been withdrawn. He further reported that at the end of the
project, the trailers could be sold. After discussion the following action was taken.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,
the Committee recommended approval by the OCWD Board to receive and file
Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids, ratify issuance of Addendum No. 1,
accept bid and award contract to Oved Dagan Construction in the amount of
$783,990 (cost to be shared equally.)
5. Integrated Information System
The following action was taken without discussion.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,
the Committee approved a workshop to be held on January 28 to review issues
related to the Integrated Information System.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
6. Joint Powers of Agreement for the Development. Operation and Maintenance of
the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project
Mr. Ron Linsky, Executive Director of the National Water Research Institute, delivered
the results of a report from the Independent Review Panel that was asked to review the
Joint Powers of Agreement of the operation and maintenance component and the fair
share distribution of these responsibilities in the O&M Agreement. Mr. Linsky
introduced the chairman of the panel, Kris Lindstrom, who gave a presentation on the
detailed review of Drafts 23 and 24 of the agreement, which entailed direct and indirect
benefits from the project to both parties. Mr. Lindstrom reported that benefits identified
were compiled from information from staff and the financial analysis of Public
Resources Advisory Group's Report. He noted benefits not in the Operation &
Maintenance Agreement included the following:
1. Value of water provided by OCSD
2. Value of delaying or avoiding a new ocean ouffall
- 5 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14,2002
3. Cost of membrane filtration backwash treatment provided by OCSD
4. Avoided costs of brine disposal by using OCSD's existing outfall
5. Year-round availability of water for reclamation
6. Water quality improvements
He reported that additional benefits of the project within the OCWD boundaries are the
values of'.
1. Averting seawater intrusion
2. Drought-proofing
3. Basin as a storage reservoir
Mr. Lindstrom also provided a summary of contributions to the operation and
maintenance of the project for each agency. He stated that the panel's conclusion was
that the Agreement adequately addressed the needs of both parties and provides for
equitable cost sharing based on the long-term benefits provided by the project and
those they serve.
Patrick Scanlon stated that staff, Mr. Linsky, and a Groundwater Producers Advisory
Committee (GPAC) Subcommittee, composed of George Martin, City of Anaheim and
Greg Heiertz, Irvine Ranch Water District, and himself, met this morning to review the
report and felt that it was a very good report. He noted that one of the items discussed
was the value placed on secondary water. He stated that the subcommittee agreed
with NW RI's recommendation for periodic reviews and he noted that the GPAC would
meet next week with the whole GPAC for further review of the NW RI Report. He
reminded the Committee that the GPAC's remaining issues on the Agreement are the
O&M costs, replacement costs for the life of the project, and termination clauses.
OCSD Director Anderson asked Mr. Scanlon to consider the cost of OCSD land being
leased to OCWD for the project at no cost.
Mr. Dawes noted that the NW RI Report will go to the Management Advisory Team on
January 23 to hear GPAC's comments and will be brought back to the Committee at the
next meeting.
7. Microfilter Pre-selection
Mr. Dawes reported that on December 18 proposals to supply the microfilters were
received from two microfilter manufacturers, US Filter/Memcor and Pall Corporation; a
third manufacturer, Zenon, elected not to propose. He reported that US Filter/Memcor
had the lowest proposed price of$27,327,808, including tax, and that Pall Corporation's
proposed price was $33,750,000, including tax. (Tax was calculated at 7.5%.) On a
calculated fife cycle present worth cost basis, he reported that US Filter/Memcor had
the lowest cost at $43,691,520 as compared to that for Pall Corporation at
$52,647,861. He reported US Filter/Memcor had several conditions in their proposal
that were unacceptable and staff has worked with them regarding their
misunderstanding of the specifications. He reported that in a letter received today from
-6-
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14,2002
US Filter/Memcor(handout)and signed by US Filters executive on the project, they
have removed 100% of all conditions and that this item will be brought back to the
Committee at the next meeting for approval.
8. Public Information and Education Program
Public Information Officer Ron W ildermuth reported on the following:
1) Receipt of Chapman University letter of endorsement for the project, the first
response from a university.
2) Rescheduling of the January 11 meeting with Department of Water
Resources Deputy Director Jonas Minton.
3) Scheduling of an open house for neighbors at OCWD on February 26 to
inform them of the mobile office complex.
4) GWR System briefing next week to the Orange County Medical Association.
9. Status Report
Mr. Dawes reported on the following items:
1) State Water Resources Control Board
a. The $5 million grant application has been approved by staff and will be on
their board consent calendar on January 23, 2002.
b. A verbal approval has been received for the $145 million loan application.
c. Offered $23 million in loans this year from the seawater intrusion barrier
program; an application is in the process of being submitted.
2) A program is being designed to handle grant and loan monies.
3) Owner of the house at 8161 Ellis Avenue with three tenants has rescinded his
offer to sell.
4) Staff met with Pegasus School to discuss two well sites.
5) Both OCWD and OCSD Boards did approve the Owner Controlled Insurance
Program.
Ms. Debbie Burris reported that a letter has been received from the Department of
Health Services stating approval to use 75% recycled water with 25% blend water and
the rest of the letter outlines all of the steps necessary to use 100% recycled water for
the project.
Director Anthony requested that a report on the progress of the design be given to the
Committee.
REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS
OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr. reported on the following issues:
1) Continuing to maintain relationship with the State Water Resources Control
Board and met with Celeste Cantu, Executive Director and Board Member
Peter Silva here at OCWD to brief them on January 4, 2002.
- 7 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 14, 2002
2) A meeting is scheduled in Sacramento tomorrow with the Director of
Department of Water Resources Tom Hannigan, Townsend Public Affairs,
Directors Pickler and Eckenrode and himself to discuss the $50 million grant,
which is from Proposition 13 Funds.
Mr. Andrew Czorny reported that the Owner Controlled Insurance Program did bind
coverages.
Mr. Dawes introduced Joanne Daugherty, a new OCW D staff member, who is a
University of Nevada, Reno, graduate competing her masters degree in environmental
engineering.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:03 p.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee
meeting is scheduled for Monday, January 28 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water
District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.
- 8 -
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
January 28, 2002, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment
System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on January 28,
2002. Members of the Committee present were:
OCSD Directors OCWD Directors
Norm Eckenrode, Vice-Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman
Brian Donahue Phil Anthony
Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr.
Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1
Brian Brady, Alternate No. 3 Jan Flory, Alternate No. 2
Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Directors Directors: Kalil Bum-Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Comeille,
Paul Walker Jan Debay John Kontor— Camp Dresser& McKee
Staff: Brett Franklin Annette McCluskey— NCG Porter Novelli
Blake Anderson Staff: Debra Burris— DDB Engineering
Jim Herberg Steven Conklin Ted Popowchak—CH2M Hill
David Ludwin Andrew Czomy Tomas Dombush, Bill Butler, Mark Biggers,
Patrick Miles Joanne Daugherty Abdul Rashidi, Harold Glaser
Bob Ooten Tom Dawes — Montgomery Watson Harza
Wendy Sevenandt Shivaji Deshmukh Heather Wells—Westinghouse
Rob Thompson Bill Everest Mike Jouhari— City of Anaheim
Counsel: Jill Everhart Richard Bell, Greg Heiertz— IRWD
Brad Hogin John Kennedy Gerald Jones— Linjer Co.
Mike Markus James Chau —
Mehul Patel Peter Herzog, Bill Tappan — Parsons
Lily Pham Patrick Scanlon—Southern Calif. Water Co.
Laura Thomas RonLinsky— NWRI
Ron Wildermuth Mark Butier Jr. — Butier Engineering
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of Meeting
Upon motion by Director Patterson seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the
minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held January 14, 2001 were
approved as mailed.
- 1 -
Jdnt GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28,2002
Director Pickier requested that the agenda item regarding the report from the
Consultant Selection Subcommittee be first on Matters for Consideration.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
2. Report from the JCC Consultant Selection Subcommittee on Construction
Management Services Contract
Program Manager Tom Dawes discussed the staff selection process used for selection
of the Montgomery Watson Harza (MW H)Team for Construction Management
Services. He reported the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) had directed the Staff
Selection Committee to meet with the JCC Consultant Selection Subcommitee to
discuss the selection process and that a meeting with the two committees had been
held. He reported that the Staff Selection Committee's recommendation is for the JCC
to approve a Professional Services Agreement to the Montgomery Watson Harza
Team.
Director Pickier asked for comments from the JCC Consultant Selection Subcommittee.
Director Brady expressed his concems based on previous experience with MWH.
Director Pickier read the motion from the minutes regarding Construction Management
Services from the January 14, 2002 JCC meetng that instructed the Consultant
Selection Subcommittee to consider two options: 1) selection of the Montgomery
Watson Harza Team; or 2) use of in-house staff for construction management services.
Director Anthony stated that the Consultant Selection Subcommittee voted and was
unable to reach a decision.
Director Pickier then asked for comments from the other Directors regarding their
concerns or opinions.
After considerable discussion, the following action was taken with a roll call vote.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Donahue and carried,
the Committee recommended approval by the OCWD/OCSD Boards to issue a
Professional Services Agreement to Montgomery Watson Harza in an amount not
to exceed $10,993,038 for Construction Management Services for the
Groundwater Replenishment System.
Ayes: Directors Pickier, Eckenrode, Donahue, Kraemer, and Patterson
Noes: Director Anthony
- 2 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28,2002
Director Pickier stated that it is important to set specific guidelines in future selection
processes and that any factors that would affect the outcome needs to be brought
forward before the selection process begins.
3. Integrated Information System
Mr. Dawes reported that the Integrated Information System (formerly known as the
Transactional Integration System) had been on hold since December 10, 2001 per the
Committee's direction and that both agencies' staff has worked to develop a new scope
of work for the Integrated Information System.
OCWD Engineer Laura Thomas gave a presentation on the redeveloped scope for the
Integrated Information System that included the original concept and also recapped the
JCC directive given to staff on December 10, 2001. She reported that the Integrated
Information System will make business processes more efficient and will reduce costs
compared to a non-integrated system. She introduced OCSD Process Controls
Manager Rob Thompson who explained how two basic types of information, operational
data (process control system, maintenance system, and financial information system)
and configuration data (data that builds the systems), would be integrated into the
system. He stated that the Financial Information System, implemented by OCWD; the
Laboratory Information Management System; and the Water Resources Information
System could all be integrated later into the GWR System. He also explained how the
information flow works and the benefit of that information flow.
Ms. Thomas then discussed integration priorities and the recommended implementation
plan. She also reported that a cost reduction would result from the new scope and that
a complete report will be brought back to the Committee next month. She
recommended to the Committee that staff be authorized to 1) renegotiate the scope of
work with Camp Dresser & McKee and reestablish their budget and 2) develop a
modified recommendation from December 10, 2001 for additional support staff to assist
in the Integrated Information System.
Mr. Dawes reported that more staff is needed now and over the next few years to
accomplish the new level of Integration Information System work.
Director Patterson requested a cost estimate in text of the agenda submittals.
Director Anthony requested that a detailed report on the Process Control System, a part
of the Integration Information System, be given to the JCC.
After discussion, the following action was taken.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried,
the Committee recommended approval as follows:
- 3 -
v
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28, 2002
A Authorize staff to negotiate Addendum No. 5 to Camp, Dresser and McKee's
scope of work to complete the design and implementation of the Integrated
Information System and include the escalation cost of inflation in their
Professional Services Agreement.
B. Authorize staff to develop a recommendation for additional project support
staff during the design and implementation of the Integrated Information
System.
C. Bring back a presentation on the Process Control System.
4. Microfiltration EauOment Pre-Selection
Mr. Dawes recommended that the Committee recommend to the OCW D Board to
award a contract to purchase the microfiltration equipment, an in-basin membrane,from
the lowest cost proposal USFilter/Memcor. He reported that testing has been ongoing
for several years and that three manufacturers became qualified during the test period,
two of which submitted a proposal on December 18, 2001. He stated that the
evaluation for selection was based on the proposals, specifications, capital costs, the
longterm cost of membrane replacement for 25-years, and other life-cycle costs. He
noted that microfiltration pre-selection had been implemented so that the design could
be planned for specific equipment, the in-basin unit. He reported that there is a $5
million savings over the budgeted amount and that this contract includes guarantees of
a 7-year life for membrane replacement.
He reported that the USFilter/Memcor contract is going to be assigned to the contractor
that wins the AWT bid at $22,810,808, plus tax and that the only expense that the
project would incur in the next six months would be $500,000 for engineering charges
to be shared equally between OCSD/OCWD. He reported that temporary microfiltration
for 6 mgd of microfilters will be contracted for this summer to keep the existing Water
Factory 21 reverse osmosis units going while the main plant is built and that the cost for
6 mgd of microfilters is $2,276,484, plus tax.
He reported that the USFilter/Memcor proposal has been resolved of previous issues
completely to staffs satisfaction.
After discussion the following action was taken.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the
Committee recommended to the OCWD Board as follows:
A. Approve USFilter/Memcor as the microfiltration equipment manufacturer for
the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present
- 4 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28, 2002
worth life cycle cost of$43,691,520, and a total capital cost of$25,587,282,
plus tax.
B. Approve a Preselection Agreement between OCWD and USFilter/Memcor to
provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of
$500,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD.
C. Assign the value of the microfiltration equipment to the contract to install the
temporary MF system at a total cost of$2,276,484, plus tax.
D. Assign the value of the microfiltration equipment to the contract to install the
permanent MF system at a total estimated capital cost of$22,810,808, plus tax.
5. Approval of Contract with SAW PA for $37 million in Proposition Funding for the
Groundwater Replenishment System
Mr. Dawes reported that a contract is needed to receive the $37 million in Proposition
13 funding from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA). He asked to modify
the recommendation to allow general counsel's approval for any mod cations needed
in the contract.
The following action was taken wRhout discussion.
Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,
the Committee recommends to the OCWD Board to authorize execution of
contract with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for$37 million for the
Groundwater Replenishment System in a manner meeting General Counsel
approval.
6. Recommend Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Orange County Flood Control
District Right-of-Way Agreement
Mr. Dawes reported that an amendment is needed to delay preparation of the Orange
County Flood Control District Right-of-Way Agreement for easements until the pipeline
design is completed.
Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Donahue and carried,
the Committee recommends to the OCWD Board approval of Amendment No. 1 to
the GWR Pipeline Right-of-Way Agreement (County Agreement No D99-117)
providing for a delay of in execution of right-of-way conveyance documents, all in
a manner meeting approval of General Counsel.
- 5 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28,2002
7. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development. Operation and
Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres
Project
Mr. Dawes reported that Draft 27 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the
Development, Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of the Groundwater Replenishment
System is ready for Committee approval, but may have some minor changes and
recommended Committee approval subject to final approval by general managers and
general counsel. He reported that the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee
(GPAC) has also reviewed Draft 27, met with staff a couple of times this month and
would present their report at this time.
He introduced Patrick Scanlon, GPAC Chair, who gave a report and presentation on
GPAC's original issues of concern; issues resolved; Issues remaining, which are
replacement costs, cost sharing re-opener, and the termination policy. He reported that
GPAC's recommendations are to: 1) agree on replacement cast sharing formula;
2) re-opener at 10 year intervals and 3) agree on equitable termination formula.
Ms. Kellene Bum-Roy reported that one of the 11 items of concern to the Groundwater
Producers was a Project Implementation Contingency Plan (PICP), which would
incorporate sufficient flexibility for unanticipated changes that would be approved by the
JCC. She reviewed the PICP which included four categories: 1) public perception;
2)cost; 3) availability of MWD replenishment water; and 4) changes in regulatory or
permit requirements. She reported that if one of the conditions occurs, it would create a
red flag and would be brought back to the JCC for discussion and direction, which could
result in actions such as redefining the project, or addressing concerns through other
means, i.e., re-bidding the project for a cost issue, providing additional education for a
public perception issue, modifying the scope with regards to MWD dependency, or
working with the regulatory agencies for technical solutions.
She recommended that the PICP be approved and to authorize staff to monitor the
conditions on an ongoing basis and bring back any change to the JCC for their
discussion and direction. She stated that the PICP would be adopted only by this
Committee and will not be a part of the 0&M Agreement.
Director Barr questioned the $10 million penalty in Section 65 of Draft 27. Blake
Anderson, OCSD general manager, responded that the $10 million is not a penalty, but
a $10 million cap depending upon a unilateral termination or a joint termination in the
contract. Mr. Dawes stated the Agreement allows both parties to mutually agree to
terminate at 50/50, but If one should terminate the language in Section 65 would apply.
Mr. Scanlan stated the GPAC have worked with staff on the PCIP and are all in
agreement. He noted that the JCC's acceptance is a first step to address their
concerns and that the PICP is a way to recognize changes as the project moves
forward.
- 6 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
January 28, 2002
Mr. Dawes noted that OCWD will be making presentations next month to the rating
agencies and the district would like to assure them that this Committee is behind the
project with their approval of the O&M Agreement.
Director Eckenrode commended the GPAC and staff for their efforts and recommended
the following action.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony, and carried,
(Director Brady had left the meeting — Director Anderson voted in his absence),
the Committee recommends to the OCWD/OCSD Boards as follows:
A. Approve the Groundwater Replenishment System Project Implementation
Contingency Plan.
B. Approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development,
Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and
the Green Acres Project, incorporating comments from the Joint Cooperative
Committee all in a manner approved by the Districts' General Managers and
General Counsels.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
8. Energy Cost Update
Mr. Dawes reported that the Cafrfomia Energy Commission's report confirms that our
estimates on energy projections rates.
9. Status Report
Ms. Annette McCluskey, NCG Porter Novell, gave preliminary results on the telephone
survey completed last week. She reported that there was a 40% rating on awareness
and a high level of support.
Mr. Dawes reported on the following items:
1) The State Water Resources Control Board Grant of$5 million was approved;
2) There were 19 applicants for the DWR grant and loan and they are
requesting more information from these applicants;
3) Wendy Sevenandt is doing a cash flow analysis for fiscal years for the
OCWD, OCSD, federal and state, which are all different;
4) He requested an extra JCC meeting for February 25 at 5:30 p.m. at OCWD;
5) Meetings are being scheduled for Fountain Valley's Council and Study
Session on February 19, and the planning commission on February 27 with
times to be determined; and
-7 -
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes I•'
January 28, 2002
6) An OCWD open house will be held on Tuesday, February 26.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:13 p.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee
meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 11 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County
Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.
-8 -
k
'I
ti
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeebRgoa[e Toed.no/ozroo-.
oz
AGENDA REPORT I[em Numbe Item Number
8
_ is(c)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement between Orange County Water District and
Montgomery Watson Harza to provide construction management services for four years for
the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total amount not to exceed
$10,993,038, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District
paying equal shares not to exceed $5,496,519.
SUMMARY
• In January 2001, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) directed Staff to seek third-
party (outside) construction management services for the Groundwater Replenishment
System (GWR) System.
• In May, the JCC authorized issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and
Statement of Interest for third party construction management services. RFQs were
sent to 18 firms. Responses were received from six firms and teams.
• In July, the JCC found that all six teams that submitted Statements of
Qualifications/Interest were qualified to do the work, and a Request for Proposals was
sent to the six teams.
• On November 30, 2001, five proposals were received.
• A seven member selection committee consisting of three staff each from Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) and Orange County Water District (OCWD), and one
staff from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) reviewed the proposals and conducted
interviews.
• The selection committee was unanimous in selecting Montgomery Watson Harza
(MWH) as the most qualified firm.
• On January 14, 2002, the JCC deferred final selection until after the JCC Selection
Subcommittee reviews the Staff recommendation.
• The JCC Selection Subcommittee met on January 22, 2002.
• On January 29, 2002, the JCC recommended approval of a Professional Services
Agreement with Montgomery Watson Harza for construction management services, as
recommended by the Selection Committee.
Gnwp.du genaa%e rd Agenda AeWna¢000 Boom Nonda R0KMM20Z1WM 1 B(c).GWRedm
R—SM-. enom, Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Authorization of$5,496,519 from the Construction Administration line item is being requested
as shown in the attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.8,page 152)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please refer to the January 14, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal.
ALTERNATIVES
The JCC and management staff considered using in-house staff with additional contract
construction management labor to manage the construction contracts for the Groundwater
Replenishment (GWR) System. Management agreed that Orange County Water District
(OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) did not have the resources to manage
this large construction program.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the GWR System was
certified by the OCSD and the OCWD Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum
No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. January 14, 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Construction Management Services.
W S:jo:nc:sa
4���Npon V=Bo AgN gepp6b30Men 1Nc1GWfl
,,, , , Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
JOB NO. J•36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE[%)
Protect
Development $ 700.000 $ 4,000 S 4.000 S 4,000 $ 4,000 S 4,000 100%
Slutliesllnermllll ' 4.000.000 S 4,000.000 S 4.000.000 $ 4.000,000 S 4,000,000 100%
Consultant PSA- S T,500,000 S 18.400,000 $ 18,400,000 S 18.158,334 S 18.158,334 $ 1,50 .000 8%
Design Staff $ 2,349,000 S 1,349,000 S 1,349.000 S 1.349.000 S 1,349,000 S 800,000 44%
Construction
Contract— $ 86.481.500 1 S 137.500.M S13T,500,000 S 9.642.655 S 9.842,855 S 0%
Con51NLbOn
Administration $ 2,653,900 $ 6.021,000 S 8.021.000 $ - S 5.495.519 $ 5,498.519 S 0%
Construction
Inspection S 9.345,800 $ 328.000 $ 326.000 $ $ - 5 0%
Contingency $ 12.895,000 $ 15,100000 $ 15.100,000 $ S - $ 0%
PROJECT TOTAL 5 121.925,000 S 182,700,000 $ - $182.700,000 $ 33.153.989 $ 5,498,519 S 38,850,508 $ 6.104,000 1 16%
Reimbursable Costs S - $ 28,000,000 1 $ 28,000.000 1 1 S 2.112.500
PROJECT NET S 121,925.000 1 S 154.100.000 1$ - $154,700,000 1 1 $ 33,153.989 S 5.496.519 $ 38.650,508 1 $ 3,991,500 10%
Funds authorized to date Includes mullipte contracts issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Protect Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment
System with the Orange County Water District
"Funds authorized to date include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jail,SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities,agreement and easements,production of
MFIUV vendor design documents.and Owner Controlled Insurance Program.
G%wp-dtdrengUDBS 8 CONTRACTSU-361ij--36 budget table 01-20-02 cm services.alsIce samcea
OCSD Confidential omservlces Page 1
Agenda Item #3
AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL
Meeting Date: January 28, 2002 Budgeted: Yes
Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants
To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01
System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $11 Million
From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A
Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes
CEQA Compliance: Yes
Staff Contact: Tam Dawes, Mike Markus
Subject: REPORT FROM THE JCC CONSULTANT SELECTION SUBCOMMITTEE
ON CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT
SUMMARY
In accordance with direction received on July 9, 2001, staff completed a selection
review for a third-party construction manager and recommended that a contract be
approved with Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) in an amount not to exceed
$10,993,038. At the January 14, 2002 regular Committee meeting, your Committee
referred the staff recommendation to the JCC Consultant Selection Subcommittee for
review.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive verbal report of JCC Consultant Subcommittee on the Consultant Management
Services Contract.
BACKGROUND
In January 2001, your Committee directed staff to seek third-party (outside)
construction management services for the GWR System.
In May, the Committee authorized issuance of a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) and
Statement of Interest for third party construction management services. RFQs were
sent to 18 firms. Responses were received from six firms and teams.
In July, your Committee found that all six teams that submitted Statements of
Qualifications/Interest were qualified to do the work, and approved a selection process
that included a staff review and a review by the JCC Selection Subcommittee. In
August, your Committee authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP's) for
- 1 -
Agenda Item #3
the Construction Management Services. The six teams that received the RFP are listed
below:
Team Lead In Association with:
CH2M HILL Boyle Engineering Corporation
PinnacleOne
Sverdrup Civil, Inc.
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Rostek Associates, Inc.
Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) Vanir Construction Management, Inc., (MBE)
Carollo Engineers P.C.
Parsons Butier Engineering, Inc.
BV Engineering
PBSBJ
URS Construction Services Black & Veatch
Brinderson
Scope of Services
The construction management consulting team will provide the following services:
• Third party claims avoidance review, including assistance in preparing the
General Provisions.
• Provision of staff, including all or most of the following:
- Inspectors
- Field Engineers
- Resident Engineers
- Project Manager
- Administrative help
• Provision of Construction Management Services
- Change Orders
- Progress Payments
- Startup Assistance
- PR and Permitting Assistance
- Cost and Schedule Controls
- Management of specialty services, such as construction survey, testing
etc.
• Administrative Services
- Data Entry
- Document Tracking and Management
- Word Processing
- Filing
Budget
- 2 -
Agenda Item #3
t Our estimate for this work was $10 to $12 million based on third-party construction
management services. Our December 2000 project cost estimate of $352 million
included $7 million for construction management services based on a staff-led
construction management program, consultant support, and direct OCWD limited-teml
staff contracts.
Selection Procedure
In accordance with direction received on July 9, 2001 from your Committee, the staff
selection committee recommendations were based on both a review of the proposals
and interviews by staff from OCSD, OCWD, and IRWD. The staff selection committee
included seven (7) members:
• OCWD staff: Mike Markus, selection Team Leader and Associate General
Manager; John Kennedy, Assistant General Manager; and Steve Conklin,
Associate General Manager.
• OCSD staff: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering; John Linder, Construction
Manager; and Chris Cervellone, Assistant Construction Manager.
• IRWD staff: Greg Heiertz, Engineering/Planning Director.
Results
Five proposals were received on November 30, 2001. The staff selection committee
reviewed the proposals and conducted interviews with the five teams on December 11
and 12. All the teams were well qualified.
The staff selection committee recommends the Montgomery Watson Harza team based
on proposal review and the interviews. After the recommendation was finalized, all the
separately sealed cost proposals were opened. Selected results follow:
Team Hours Price with Price Inflation Cost of
Inflation (2002 Dollars) Information serviceslhr
Montgomery Wafson
Harza 128,896 $11.555,000 $10,993,038 $561,962 $89.65
CH2M Hill 102,242 $10.939,322 $10,323,530 $615,792 $106.99
Parsons 119,325 $11,869,951 N/A N/A $99.48
Malcolm Pimie N/A $11,768,352 N/A N/A N/A
URS 139,090 $14,893,024 N/A 2.5%/year $107.07
WA-Not available.
While the staff recommendation was made before financial data was available, MWH
has the lowest cost of services per employee hour.
Evaluation Criteria. A blank summary form used by the staff selection committee is
attached. The staff evaluation gave Montgomery Watson Harza the highest rating
based on these criteria.
- 3 -
Agenda Item#3
Staff Recommendation. At the January 14, 2002, the staff selection committee
recommended entering into a professional services agreement (PSA) with Montgomery
Watson Harza to provide construction management services. The PSA will include an
annual inflation allowance awarded each July 1 based on the CPI (LA) with a 3% cap,
applied to remaining contract funds each April. The first adjustment will be April 1,
2003.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Based on the discussion at the meeting on January 14, 2002, your Committee deferred
final selection until after the JCC Selection Subcommittee reviews the staff
recommendation. As of this writing, a tentative meeting of the JCC Selection
Subcommittee has been scheduled for January 22, 2002. The Subcommittee will
provide a verbal report at the Committee meeting on January 28, 2002.
PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS
January 8, April 9, May 14, July 9, and August 13, 2001, and January 14, 2002.
-4 -
PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Dae TO Bd.of Dir.
az/o�/oz oz/nroz
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDO02-05 18(d)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator. Wendy Sevenandt
SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and
Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, and the Green Acres
Project between the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District, in a
form approved by General Counsel
SUMMARY
• The Groundwater Replenishment(GWR) System has been developed under a cost sharing
agreement as amended.
• Under this agreement, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)was established to provide
project management, authority was delegated to th&JCC, and provisions were prescribed for
cost sharing.
• In accordance with direction received from the JCC, Staff and General Counsel of both
agencies have prepared a new comprehensive agreement, which, if approved,will supercede
the GWR System cost sharing agreement and all other agreements between Orange County
Water District(OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD).
• The new agreement, titled the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development,
Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres
Project (Agreement), provides a detailed plan for water delivery for both the Green Acres
Project (GAP)and GWR System, including financing, limits of spending authority, operations,
and maintenance of the GWR System.
• The Agreement was presented at the October 10 Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee and the November 1, 2001 Planning, Design and Construction
Committee meetings.
• This report presents a revised Agreement incorporating comments from the last several JCC
meetings, as well as revisions by staff of the agencies and certain comments from the
Groundwater Producers.
• Findings of the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) regarding their review of the equity of
the cost sharing provisions were presented at the January 14, 2002, JCC meeting.
• The Agreement was presented at the January 28, 2002, JCC meeting, and is recommended for
approval by the OCWD and OCSD Board of Directors.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The Boards of Directors of OCSD and OCWD approved the GWR System on March 28, 2001,with
the cost of design and construction to be paid in equal 50% shares by each agency. In June 2001,
the OCSD Board approved a budget of$182,700,000. The Budget Infor mationTable is attached.
Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 152)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Under the proposed Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement(Agreement), the General Managers, the
JCC, and the full Boards of the Orange County Water District (OCWD)and Orange County
Sanitation District (OCSD) have contracting authority. The procedure for approval of Purchase
Orders, Task Orders, Professional Services Agreements, and Construction Contracts is to go
through the General Managers, the JCC, and then to the full Boards as delegated in the
Agreement. Authorizations for contracting, per the Agreement, do not include other Board
Committees at OCSD or OCWD.
Funding for the construction is included in the OCSD budget at a total amount of$137,500,000,
which is 50%of the total estimated construction budget of$275,000,000. The breakdown of the
construction contract budget and the construction schedule is shown in the following table.
Contract Cost Estimated Estimated
ID No. Start Date Finish Date
Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Completed
1 Portion $ 1431840 12/31/01
2 GWR Pipeline— Reach 1 $ 22.430 000 03/10/03 05/09/05
3 GWR Pipeline— Reach 2 $ 17.490 000 06/13/02 03/24/04
4 GWR Pipeline— Reach 3 $ 16,880.000 08/23/02 01/06/05
5 Temp MF/Site work $ 3100 000 09/03/02 05/02/03
6 Site Power $ 9,431,000 07/09/02 03/04/03
SCE Work for Permanent
7 Substation $ 2,396,000 Awarded 03/04/03
8 Demolition $ 1390,000 05/05/03 07/31/03
9 Plies/Foundations $ 4 900 000 03/14/03 09/30/03
Advanced Water Treatment
10 Facilities $ 180,490000 10/01/03 5/11/06
Barrier Line to Adams (MWD
11 Connection) $ 3,000 000 05/03/02 03/14/03
Barrier Well Drilling/Monitoring
Wells/Wellhead
12 Facilities/Pipelines $ 7,130000 10/25/02 11/16/04
GWR Team Temp
13 1 Offices/Trailers $ 783,990 Awarded 04/16/02
Construction Total $ 270,852,830
Page 2
a
Y
With this Agreement, contracting authority Is delegated to OCWD Board within certain budgetary
provisions. Under the proposed Agreement, the OCSD Board would be delegating authority to the
OCWD Board (with recommendation from the JCC)the award of contracts that are under
$10,000,000. Contracts in excess of$10,000,000 would require the OCSD Board authority to
award.
If the engineer's estimate exceeds the construction budgets, or if the lowest bid exceeds the
engineer's estimate, the Agreement requires Staff to bring the contracts back to the OCSD Board
for award.
Under the Agreement, the contracting authority of the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)will
remain at$100,000. The contracting authority of the Orange County Water District (OCWD)
General Manager will be increased to $50,000.
The OCSD Board look action authorizing the OCWD Board to award two equipment pre-selection
agreements:
Equipment Preselection Agreements Est Cost Est. OCSD Previous OCSD
50% Share Board Approval
Dates
MF Equipment Preselectlon ($32,000,000 will $32,500,000 $16,250,000 October 24, 2001
Be assigned to Temp MF &AWTF Contracts
UV Equipment Preselection ($10,000,000 will $10,250,000 $5,125,000 October 24, 2001
Be assigned to AWTF Contract
ALTERNATIVES
Without the approval of an agreement between the two agencies, the agencies would continue to
operate under the existing agreements, which do not sufficiently address all the issues facing the
two agencies.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater
Replenishment(GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) and
the Orange County Water District(OCWD)Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No.
1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23,
2002, and by(OCWD) on January 16, 2002.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. January 28 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the
Development,Operation, and Maintenance of the GWR System and the Green Acres Project
3. Draft Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of
the GWR System and the Green Acres Project
WS:jo:jak:sa
G:\wp.dta\agendaTDQ2002\Agenda Reports\02-05-J-36-020702.doc
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
JOB NO. J-36
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Development ed
Oevelo moot $ 700,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 E 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100%
StudleslPermiltin ' 4,0DD000 E 4.000,000 $ 4,000,OOo $ 4,OOD.000 $ 4,000,000 10D%
Consultant PSA' $ 7,500,000 S 18,400.000 S 18.400.000 S 18,158,334 $ 18,158,334 $ 1,5D0,000 8%
Design Staff IS 2.349.000 $ 1.340.000 1 S 1,349,000 $ 1,349,000 1 $ 1.349.000 1 S 800,D00 44%
Cone9uctlon
Contract' $ 86,481,500 $ 137.500.00o S 137,500,000 $ 9.642,855 $ 9,842,855 $ 0%
Construction
Administration $ 2.853.8DD $ 8,021,OD0 $ 8,021,000 $ $ - $ 0%
-
Construction
Inspection $ 9,345.800 S 32BODO $ 326000 $ $ - $ 0%
Contingency $ 12,895,000 $ 15,100.000 $ 15,100.000 It $ - $ 0%
PROJECT TOTAL 9 121,925,000 1$ 182,700,000 $ $182,700,000 $ 33.153.989 $ - S 33,153,989 $ SAN,= 18%
Reimbursable Costs $ - $ 26.000,000 1 $ 28,000.000 11 $ 2,112,500
PROJECT NET $ 121,925,D00 1$ 154,700,000 1$ - $1M.700,0c0 1 $ 33,153,989 S - S 33,163.989 1 S 3.991.500 ilv
Funds authorized to date includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment
System with the Orange County Water Dlstnct
"Funds authorized to dole Include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jell,SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities,agreement and easements,production of
MFIUV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program.
GAwpAlMengUOBS 8 OONTRACTSII-381g38 budget table 020702 pdc oft agmt.XIsIOBM agmt
OCSD Confidential OSM agml Page i
Agenda Item #7
AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL
Meeting Date: January 28, 2002 Budgeted: Yes
Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants
To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70.01
System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $352 Million
From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A
Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes
CEQA Compliance: Yes
Staff Contact: Tom Dawes
Subject: JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT,
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER
REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM AND THE GREEN ACRES PROJECT
SUMMARY
In accordance with direction received from your Committee, a new revised
comprehensive agreement, Draft No. 27 has been prepared by staff of both agencies
which, if approved, will supercede the GWR System cost sharing agreement and all
other agreements between Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County
Sanitation District (OCSD). The new agreement, titled the Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater
Replenishment System and Green Acres Project (Agreement), provides a detailed plan
for water delivery for both the GWR System and the Green Acres Project (GAP),
including financing, operations, and maintenance of the GWR System. This revised
Agreement incorporates comments from the last several Committee meetings, as well
as revisions by staff of the agencies and certain comments from the Groundwater
Producers.
The Agreement was discussed with the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee
(GPAC) at meetings on October 10, 17 and 30; November 7 and 27; December 18,
2001; and January 14 and 22, 2002. In addition, at your request the NWRI prepared an
independent report on the agreement, which was reviewed with you on January 14,
2002.
The Agreement references the Project Implementation Contingency Plan, which has
been approved by the GPAC.
- 1 -
Agenda Item #7
RECOMMENDATION
Agendize for February 6 OCWD Board meeting and for February 27 OCSD Board
meeting.
A. Approve the Groundwater Replenishment System Project Implementation
Contingency Plan.
B. Approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation
and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres
Project, incorporating comments from the Joint Cooperative Committee all in a
manner approved by the General Managers and General Counsels.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
The Draft Agreement has been thoroughly reviewed by your committee, the
Groundwater Producers, NWRI, and staff and legal counsel of the two agencies. Not
everyone agrees with all the terms. It is recommended that your Committee recommend
the agreement for final approval.
On March 28, 2001, the Boards of both OCWD and the OCSD authorized the
implementation of the GWR System based on a set of anticipated conditions. The
Boards also recognized that certain changes to these conditions could warrant further
consideration of the project with regard to its scope, implementation schedule or overall
viability. This Project Implementation Contingency Plan (PICP) is written to document
the possible changes in conditions that would trigger consideration and discussion of
the project by the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) and the possible actions
available to the Boards to address these changed conditions. Section IV of the Draft
Agreement addresses "off-ramps". The PICP was developed with and has been
approved by the GPAC. A copy of the PICP is attached for review and consideration of
the JCC.
PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS
Discussed informally from time-to-time and as an agenda item in July, August and
November 1999; February, June, and November 2000, and January, February,
October and November 2001, and January 14, 2002.
Attachments:
• Project Implementation Contingency Plan
• Draft 27 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation
and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres
Project
- 2 -
Groundwater Replenishment System
Project Implementation Contingency Plan
On March 28, 2001, the Boards of both the Orange County Water District(OCWD)and the
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)authorized the implementation of the Groundwater
Replenishment System (GWR System)based on a set of anticipated conditions. The Boards
also recognized that certain changes to these conditions could warrant further consideration of
the project with regard to its scope, implementation schedule or overall viability. This Project
Implementation Contingency Plan is written to document the possible changes in conditions that
would trigger consideration and discussion of the project by the Joint Cooperative Committee
(JCC)and the possible actions available to the Boards to address these changed conditions.
Possible Changes Monitoring Plan Possible Actions
In Conditions
Public Perception . Conduct periodic surveys to . Redefine the project to
The public perception track project awareness and address public concerns
of the project support . Provide increased
significantly . Time surveys to precede education to the public
deteriorates major decisions such as to address concerns
proceeding with construction
of the GWR Pipeline or
Advanced Water Treatment
Facility
Cost Provide quarterly financial . Redefine the project to
The capital, operation reports to the Groundwater reflect changes in cost
and maintenance, unit Producers Advisory and/or funding
cost or funding Committee(GPAC)and to . Seek lower cost
availability changes the JCC including modeling alternatives (such as
significantly of the potential range in key alternative energy
cost and funding agreements, rebidding,
assumptions redesign of certain
Track status and actions of components for reduced
key cost and funding cost, etc.)
elements that affect project
cost, both approved and
anticipated
MIND Replenishment . Conduct periodic meetings . Modify the scope of the
Water with MWD to track water project to meet the
MWD commits to the availability reduced need for local
availability of Communicate with MWDOC replenishment water
replenishment water periodically to gain their . Increase dependence
on a long-tern basis perception of potential on imported MWD water
commitment
1 Rev.01r23102
Groundwater Replenishment System
Project Implementation Contingency Plan
Possible Changes Monitoring Plan Possible Actions
in Conditions
Reoulatory Communicate with regulatory . Work with the regulatory
Requirements agencies, such as agencies to provide
The regulatory Department of Health technical solutions to
requirements and/or Services, Regional Water issues at hand
permit compliance Quality Control Board, and . Modify project as
changes, resulting in a Environmental Protection needed to meet
non-compliant system Agency, periodically to gain regulatory constraints
awareness of potential
requirement changes
Attend DHS and RWQCB
public hearings to gain
awareness of potential
requirement changes
2 Rev.01/23/02
DRAFT27
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
AND THE GREEN ACRES PROJECT
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IRMO
RECITALS...................................................................................................................................1..
AGREEMENT.............................................................................................................................4..
I. Existing Agreements ......................................................................................................A.
1. Termination of the Cooperative Agreement.........................................................A
2. Termination of the Wastewater Utilization Agreement.........................................4
II. Planning. Design and Construction ................................................................................A
A. Finance and Ownership of the Phase I Facilities.......................................................5
3. Financing of Phase I Components.......................................................................5
4. Financing of the Sanitation District's Activated Sludge Secondary Plant
and Ellis Avenue Pump Station Upgrades...........................................................B
5. Unanticipated Capital Facilities............................................................................5
6. System Ownership...............................................................................................5.
B. Governance of Planning, Design and Construction Activities.....................................5
7. Scope of Work.....................................................................................................5.
7.1 Planning, Final Design and Construction.....................................................8
7.2 Services Required.......................................................................................A
8. Joint Cooperative Committee...............................................................................6
9. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the Water District
Boardof Directors................................................................................................a.
10. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the Joint Cooperative Commilim............7
11. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the General Managers.............................7
12. Approval of Plans and Specifications; Direction to Water District.........................8
13. Joint Cooperative Committee Recommendations re. Award of
Construction Contracts........................................................................................8.
14. Award of Contracts by the Water District Board of Directors...............................5
15. Approval of Contracts by the Sanitation District Board of Directors.....................8
16. Construction Management;Acceptance of Construction.....................................8
17. Sanitation District and Water District Employees Assigned to the System..........8
C. The Water District's Planning, Design and Construction Obligations.........................9
18. Day-to-Day Management....................................................................................A
19. System Employees..............................................................................................9.
20. Reimbursement and Grant Receipts....................................................................9
21. Lands, Easement and Rights-of-Way..................................................................9
22. Permits and Approvals.........................................................................................9.
23. Plans and Specifications....................................................................................10
24. Preparation of Contract Documents...................................................................10
-i- DraR 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
25. Advertisement of Bids.........................................................................................1D
26. Construction Management.................................................................................1.0
27. Reports and Budgets..........................................................................................10
28. Contribution for Activated Sludge Secondary Plant Upgrades............................10
29. Indemnity............................................................................................................1.1
D. The Sanitation District's Planning, Design and Construction Obligations.................11
30. Payment of Invoices...........................................................................................1.1
31. Trickling Filter Upgrades.....................................................................................1.1
32. Activated Sludge Secondary Plant and Ellis Avenue Pump Station
Upgrades............................................................................................................1.1
33. Lease of the Eight-Acre Property.......................................................................11
34. Grant of License to the Water District to Use an Entrance on the
Sanitation District's Property..............................................................................12
35. Grant of License to the Water District for Temporary
Construction Staging Areas................................................................................12
III. Operation and Maintenance ..........................................................................................12
A. The Water District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations.................................12
36. Water District Operation and Maintenance.........................................................12
37. Continuous Operation of the AWl-Facilities.......................................................13
38. Guaranteed Capability to Handle Peak Storm-Related Flows............................13
39. Electrical Power Supply..................:...................................................................13
4D. NPDES Permit...................................................................................................14
41. Water Reclamation Permit.................................................................................1A
42. System Employees............................................................................................14
43. Staffing Plan.......................................................................................................14
44. Regular Meetings...............................................................................................14
45. System Modifications..........................................................................................14
46. Compliance with Laws.......................................................................................IS
47. Monthly and Annual Reports..............................................................................15
48. Annual Budgets..................................................................................................15
49. Accounting.........................................................................................................15
50. Records..............................................................................................................15
51. Regulatory Reporting..........................................................................................15
52. Annual Independent Audit..................................................................................15
53. Insurance...........................................................................................................1.6
54. Green Acres Project Service To The Sanitation Distrkt.....................................16
54.1 Cost of Reclaimed Water...........................................................................16
54.2 Quality of Reclaimed Water.......................................................................16
54.3 Minimum Delivery of Reclaimed Water......................................................17
54.4 Ownership of Reclaimed Water Facilities...................................................17
55. Quality of Reclamation Plan Waste....................................................................17
-ii- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
56. Water Quality Monitoring....................................................................................1.7
57. Independent Contractor......................................................................................1B
B. The Sanitation District's Operations and Maintenance Obligation&..........................18
58. Delivery and Quality of Wastewater...................................................................18
59. Industrial Pretreatment and Pollution Source Control Program..........................18
60.Acceptance of Waste Brine, Micro6lter and Green Acres Project Return Flows 19
61. Further Conditioning or Treatment of Brine to be Discharged to the Sanitation
District's Outfall..................................................................................................19
62. Costs of Secondary Wastewater Treatment.......................................................19
63. Costs of NDMA Treatment.................................................................................19
IV. Tenn and Termination ............................................................:.....................................20
64. Term..................................................................................................................20
65. Termination During Final Design........................................................................20
66. Termination After Construction Has Commenced..............................................20
V. Default of Operational Obligations ................................................................................20
67. Default and Consequences...............................................................................20
67.1 Condition of Default..................................................................................20
67.2 Dispute Resolution....................................................................................21
67.3 Consequence of Water District Default.....................................................21
67.4 Consequence of Sanitation District Default...............................................21
67.5 Specific Performance...........................................................:....................21
VI. Miscellaneous ..............................................................................................................21
68. Force Majeure....................................................................................................21
68.1 The Sanitation District's Indemnity For Negligent Acts or Omissions
Related to Construction.............................................................................22
68.2 The Water District's Indemnity...................................................:...............22
69. Notices..............................................................................................................22
70. Successors And Assigns...................................................................................23
71. Further Acts and Assurances.............................................................................23
72. Captions............................................................................................................23
73. Severability.......................................................................................................23
74. Entire Agreement...............................................................................................23
75. Modifications in Writing......................................................................................23
76. Interpretation......................................................................................................24
77. Governing Law...................................................................................................24
78. No Third-Party Beneficiaries..............................................................................24
79. Assignment.......................................................................................................24
80. Representation and Warranties..........................................................................24
-III- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
AND THE GREEN ACRES PROJECT
This Joint Exercise Of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation And
Maintenance Of The Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project
("Agreement") is made and entered into, to be effective the day of
2002, by and between the Orange County Water District (the "Water District") and the
Orange County Sanitation District (the "Sanitation District"). The Water District and the
Sanitation District are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the
"Parties," and individually referred to as each "Party."
RECITALS
This Agreement is based on the following facts, mutual understandings and
intentions of the Parties:
A. The Water District is a public agency created and governed by the Orange
County Water District Act (uncodified Act 5683, Stats. 1933, Chapter 924, as amended).
The Water District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities
necessary to augment and protect the quantity and quality of the water supply within its
boundaries. The Sanitation District is a public agency formed by legislation effective
July 1, 1998 and is organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act Chapter 3,
Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, as amended. The Sanitation District is
authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities for the collection,
treatment and disposal of wastewater and water reclamation facilities.
B. On January 15, 1997, the Parties entered into an agreement entitled
"Second Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater"
(the "Wastewater Utilization Agreement"). Pursuant to the Wastewater Utilization
Agreement, the Sanitation District diverts secondary wastewater from its secondary
clarifiers to two treatment facilities at the Water District, the "Water Factory 21" facility
and the "Green Acres Project" reclamation facility. Water Factory 21 treats the
Sanitation District's wastewater and discharges treated water to injection wells designed
to prevent seawater intrusion into the Orange County groundwater basin through the
Talbert Gap located in the Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa areas.
The Green Acres Project facility treats wastewater to Title 22 standards for reclaimed
water and provides it to users for irrigation and processing. The Water District sends
waste brine and other waste streams from Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres
Project facility to the Sanitation District for treatment and disposal. The Sanitation
District purchases water from the Green Acres Project and uses the water for various
purposes at the Sanitation District's treatment plants.
C. In February of 1997, the Parties entered into an agreement entitled
"Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for Orange County Reclamation Project"
initiating project planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System (formerly known
-1 - Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
as Orange County Regional Reclamation Project or "OCR" Project). This agreement, as
amended, established a Joint Cooperative Committee to act as an Advisory Board for
development of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The agreement as amended
is referred to in this Agreement as the "Cooperative Agreement."
D. As proposed, the Groundwater Replenishment System (the "System") will
take treated secondary wastewater from the Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant
No. 1 and treat it to drinking water standards. The wastewater will be treated at
Advanced Wastewater Treatment ("AWT") facilities to be constructed by the Parties on
the Water District's and Sanitation District's property in Fountain Valley. The AWT
facilities will include equipment for microfiltration, reverse osmosis and ultraviolet
disinfection, and related pumping, power and chemical facilities. The AWT facilities will
replace Water Factory 21.
E. Initially, nearly all of the product water from the Groundwater
Replenishment System will be placed in the Orange County groundwater basin, in two
ways. First, some of the product water will be injected into existing and/or new injection
wells designed to prevent seawater intrusion in the Talbert Gap located in the
Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa areas. Second, some of the
product water will be pumped to the Water District's Santa Ana River water spreading
basins in Anaheim and Orange. From there, the product water will percolate into the
groundwater basin. In order to convey the water to the spreading basins, the Parties
intend to construct a pipeline from Fountain Valley to the basins ("GWR Pipeline"). In
addition, a small portion of the Groundwater Replenishment System's product water
may be used for the Green Acres Project during the summer months, or for industries,
businesses, golf courses, parks and other land uses with a need for process water
and/or irrigation water.
F. The Parties contemplate that the System will be built in three phases, with
the System's capacity increasing with each successive phase. During "Phase I" of the
System, the System will have the capacity to produce approximately seventy thousand
(70,000) acre-feet of treated water per year. During "Phase II," the System will have the
capacity to produce approximately one hundred thousand (100,000) acre-feet of treated
water per year. During "Phase III," the System will have the capacity to produce one
hundred and thirty thousand (130,000) acre-feet of treated water per year. The precise
amounts produced per year during each Phase will vary due to weather conditions,
available wastewater flows and other factors. At this time, the Sanitation District intends
to participate in, and contribute funding for, construction of Phase I only. The Sanitation
District at this time does not intend to participate in or contribute funding for the Phase II
or Phase III construction projects. Therefore, the respective obligations set forth in
Section II of this Agreement only relate to the planning, design and construction of
Phase I of the System. The operations and maintenance obligations throughout the
balance of the Agreement, however, shall apply to all Phases of the System, including
Phases I, II and III.
-2- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
G. The System will fulfill a number of important purposes. First, the System
will provide a new reliable source of water to serve the growing Orange County
population. Second, the groundwater recharge will maintain or reduce the average total
dissolved solids ("TDS") content of the water in the Orange County groundwater basin.
Third, the System will allow the Water District to replace Us aging Water Factory 21
facilities, thereby eliminating an estimated one hundred and twenty-eight million dollar
($128,000,000) expenditure for replacement facilities. Fourth, the System will provide a
source of water for maintaining and enhancing the Talbert Gap Seawater Intrusion
Barrier that is reliable, high quality and unaffected by drought conditions. Fifth, by
providing water for the Intrusion Barrier and groundwater recharge, the System will help
reduce reliance on imported water. Finally, the System will give the Sanitation District a
reliable outlet to dispose of up to one hundred (100) million gallons per day ("mgd') of
secondary treated wastewater. This will allow the Sanitation District to delay and
possibly eliminate a planned second ocean ouffall, needed primarily to dispose of wet
weather peak flows. The second oulfall would cost an estimated one hundred and
seventy million dollar ($170,000,000) (in December 2000 Dollars).
H. In entering into this Agreement, the Sanitation District is relying on the
Water District's guarantee, set forth in Section 38 of this Agreement, that the System
will provide a reliable outlet for the Sanitation District to dispose of up to one hundred
(100) mgd of secondary treated wastewater.
I. Since signing the Cooperative Agreement, the Parties have studied the
planning, engineering, funding, environmental, and economic aspects of the System's
design, construction and operation. The parties have: (a) conducted research on system
configuration, equipment testing and equipment demonstration; (b) considered issues
relating to size of components (for both the System and the Green Acres Project),
environmental compliance, financing (including grants), legal and governance matters,
rights-of-way acquisition, standards and public information; and (c) considered
regulatory compliance requirements, including permits (from such agencies as the
Department of Health Services and the Regional Water Quality Control Board), testing
and reporting requirements. The parties have also completed 30% design of Phase I of
the System and are obtaining the necessary permits for the System.
J. On March 28, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Water District and the
Board of Directors of the Sanitation District approved and authorized proceeding with
the final design, construction, and operation of Phase I. In addition, the two Boards
authorized implementation, to the extent possible, of the Groundwater Producers'
recommendations for proceeding with final design, construction, and operation of
Phase I as set forth in their letter dated March 25, 2001.
K. This Agreement provides for the further planning, design, construction,
operation and maintenance of the System by the joint venture of the Parties. This
Agreement is a Joint Powers Agreement within the meaning of Government Code
§ 6500 at seq. Pursuant to this Agreement, the Parties intend to jointly exercise powers
common to them. The Parties possess, inter alia, the following common powers and
authority:
-3- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System '
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
(1) the power and authority to construct, operate and maintain facilities,
pipelines, other conduits, machinery, and other works to conserve,
reclaim, purify, treat, transport or otherwise manage and put to
beneficial use water that was recovered from operation of a sewerage
system;
(2) the power and authority to discharge water so as to replenish the
underground basin and other natural water resources; and
(3) the power and authority to acquire real and personal property, within or
without the Parties' districts, necessary or convenient for the full
exercise of their respective powers.
The method by which the Parties intend to jointly exercise these powers is set
forth throughout this Agreement. This Agreement is also intended to set forth the terms
and conditions governing (1) the Sanitation District's provision of secondary treated
wastewater to the Water District for the Green Acres Project, and (2) the Water District's
provision of tertiary treated Green Acres Project water to the Sanitation District.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts recited and the
mutual goals and objectives contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
I. Existing Agreements.
1. Termination of the Cooperative Agreement. This Agreement is intended to
supercede the Cooperative Agreement. Therefore, the Cooperative Agreement shall
terminate as of the effective date of this Agreement. On termination, the Parties shall
have no further obligations under the Cooperative Agreement, except for financial
obligations that were incurred prior to termination.
2. Termination of the Wastewater Utilization Agreement. This Agreement is
intended to supercede the Wastewater Utilization Agreement once Phase I of the
System first becomes operational. Therefore, the Wastewater Utilization Agreement
shall terminate as of the date that Phase I of the System first becomes operational. On
termination, the Parties shall have no further obligations under the Wastewater
Utilization Agreement, except for financial obligations that were incurred prior to
termination.
-a- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
II. Planning, Design and Construction.
A. Finance and Ownership of the Phase I Facilities.
3. Financing of Phase I Components. Each Party shall pay fitly percent (50%)
of the costs of planning, design and construction of.the System's Phase I AWT facilities,
pumping facilities, seawater barrier injection wells and GWR Pipeline, as more
particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The Parties estimate that
planning, design and construction of the Phase I System components will cost
approximately three hundred and fifty two million dollars ($352,000,000) (in December
2000 dollars). Project costs include but are not limited to (a) payments for professional
consultant contract services, together with salaries and benefits of System employees;
(b) an apportioned amount of salaries and benefits for employees of either Party
assigned tasks for the System pursuant to Section 17 of this Agreement; and
(c) construction projects and other project related costs approved by the Joint
Cooperative Committee and/or the governing boards in accordance with this
Agreement.
4. Financing of the Sanitation District's Activated Sludge Secondary Plant and
Ellis Avenue Pump Station Upgrades. Each Party shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the
costs of the Sanitation District's activated sludge secondary plant and Ellis Avenue
pump station upgrades described in Section 32 of this Agreement.
5. Unanticipated Capital Facilities. The Parties contemplate that Phase I of the
System as currently designed will be adequate to accommodate peak secondary
treated wastewater flows of up to one hundred (100) mgd during wet weather events. If
the System as currently designed proves inadequate to accommodate peak secondary
wastewater flows of one hundred (100) mgd, and additional equipment, components or
facilities are necessary to provide the required capacity, the Parties shall each pay My
percent (50%) of the cost of such additional equipment, components or facilities. In the
event that new quality or quantity discharge requirements are received that require
additional capital expenditures to serve Phase I, the Parties shall share equally the
capital costs associated with construction of the required facilities. In the event that
quality changes occur to Sanitation Districts feed water that require added capital
expenditures to serve Phase I, said capital expenditures shall be equally shared
between the Parties.
6. System Ownership. The Water District shall hold title to all facilities to be
constructed under this Agreement, including but not limited to the pumping facilities, the
AWT facilities, the GWR Pipeline, the seawater barrier facilities and related facilities,
and all easements and rights-of-way to be obtained for the System's facilities.
B. Governance of Planning, Design and Construction Activities.
7. Scope of Work. The Parties will jointly plan, design and construct the
Phase I System facilities according to the following scope of work.
-5- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
7.1 Planning, Final Design and Construction. The Parties shall complete
design of Phase I of the System, establish the method of product delivery, prepare
construction plans and establish detailed specifications for equipment. The Parties shall
also construct Phase I of the System. To that end, the Parties shall prepare bid
documents, solicit bids, negotiate and execute contracts, purchase equipment, provide
for construction management, inspect construction projects, and comply with regulatory
requirements for operation, testing and start up of the system.
7.2 Services Required. Throughout final design and construction of Phase I of
the System, the Water District and/or the Sanitation District shall obtain a variety of
services in the following areas:
• Project Management Engineering
• Environmental
• Finance
• Legal
• Grant and Loan Support
• Public Relations
• Construction Management
• Construction
• Other Specialized Services as Identified and Approved by the Joint
Cooperative Committee
• Specialized Staff Support, at burdened cost rates, consisting of direct
salary times 1.5, as approved by the General Managers of the Water
District and the Sanitation District
8. Joint Cooperative Committee. Ultimate authority for the planning, design
and construction of Phase I of the System rests with the governing boards of the Water
District and the Sanitation District. In order to facilitate and expedite the development
process, however, the governing boards hereby establish and delegate to a Joint
Cooperative Committee certain authority to direct and oversee planning, design and
construction activities as set forth below. As provided under the Cooperative
Agreement, the Joint Cooperative Committee will continue to consist of a total of six (6)
directors, including three (3) Water District directors appointed by the Water District
President and three (3) Sanitation District directors appointed by the Sanitation District
Chair. In addition, the Water District President and the Sanitation District Chair shall
appoint one alternate for each regular member, for a total of three alternates per
agency. Each alternate shall serve on the Committee in the event that the
corresponding director is absent. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall annually elect
one of its members as Chair and one of its members as Vice-Chair who shall preside at
all meetings. A quorum for the purpose of transacting business shall consist of two
members from each of the two boards.
9. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the Water District Board of Directors.
In order to further facilitate and expedite the development process, the Sanitation
District hereby delegates to the Water District Board of Directors final authority to
approve, award and execute all contracts and change orders necessary for
-6- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
development of Phase I of the System, including professional service contracts,
construction contracts and other contracts, without need for ratification or approval by
the Sanitation District Board of Directors, provided that:
(a) prior funding has been included in each agency's annual budget as
adopted by each agency's Board of Directors;
(b) the engineer's estimate for each contract does not exceed the
construction budget, and the lowest responsible bid does not
exceed the engineer's estimate;
(c) the authorization does not exceed the following:
(1) five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for each professional
service contract;
(2) ten million dollars ($10,000,000)for each construction contract;
and
(3) ten percent (10%) in the aggregate in change orders for each
professional service or construction contract; and
(d) at least two of the three Directors serving on the Joint Cooperative
Committee from each agency approve of each item at a duly
noticed and held meeting of the Committee.
Contracts and change orders other than those described above shall be approved by
both governing boards upon recommendation of the Joint Cooperative Committee
before the Water District executes each contract or change order.
10. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the Joint Cooperative Committee.
The Water District Board of Directors and the Sanitation District Board of Directors
hereby delegate to the Joint Cooperative Committee the authority to authorize the
following, provided that prior funding has been included in each agency's annual budget
as adopted by each agency's Board of Directors:
(a) purchase contracts or amendments to vendors or suppliers in an
amount not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000);
and
(b) Issue task orders and purchase orders meeting Water District's
adopted policies in an amount not to exceed one hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000).
11. Delegation of Contracting Authority to the General Managers. The Water
District Board of Directors and the Sanitation District Board of Directors hereby delegate
to the Water District's General Manager the authority to issue or cause to be issued
purchase contracts, task orders, and amendments necessary for the planning, design
and construction of the System in amounts not to exceed $50,000, provided that prior
-7- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
funding has been included in each agency's annual budget as adopted by each
agency's Board of Directors.
12. Approval of Plans and Specifications; Direction to Water District. The Joint
Cooperative Committee shall consider and approve the plans and specifications for
each System component project if the engineer's estimate and lowest responsible bid
do not satisfy listed in Section II B.9(b) of this Agreement. Upon such approval, the
Joint Cooperative Committee shall direct the Water District to prepare all contract
documents and publicly advertise for construction bids for that project.
13. Joint Cooperative Committee Recommendations re. Award of Construction
Contracts. After bids are received for each construction project, the Joint Cooperative
Committee shall approve the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid.
For bids that do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), the Committee shall
recommend that the Water District's governing board award the contract. For bids
exceeding ten million dollars ($10,000,000), the Committee shall recommend that both
governing boards approve the contract prior to award of the contract.
14. Award of Contracts by the Water District Board of Directors. The Water
District Board of Directors shall approve, award and execute all contracts and change
orders necessary for development of Phase I of the System, including professional
service contracts, construction contracts and other contracts.
15. Approval of Contracts by the Sanitation District Board of Directors. The
Sanitation District's Board of Directors shall retain and exercise the authority to
specifically approve all contracts and change orders necessary for development of
Phase I of the System, including professional 'service contracts, construction contracts
and other contracts, that exceed the limits of delegation set forth in Sections 9, 10 and
11 of this Agreement.
16. Construction Management; Acceptance of Construction. The Joint
Cooperative Committee shall approve construction management services for each
construction project, and the Water District shall provide such services using staff or
consultant services. Upon receiving the recommendation of the Water District's
General Manager to accept construction for each construction project, the Joint
Cooperative Committee shall approve such acceptance if it determines that the
component was constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
17. Sanitation District and Water District Employees Assigned to the System.
Employees of either Party who were not specifically retained to provide services for the
System as described in Section 19 of this Agreement may be assigned to work on tasks
for the System. With the approval of both the Sanitation District General Manager and
the Water District General Manager, an apportioned amount of each such employee's
salary and benefits may be charged to the System and allocated between the Parties
pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement.
-e- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
C. The Water District's Planning, Design and Construction Obligations.
18. Day-to-Day Management. The Water District shall provide day-to-day
management of the planning, design and construction of Phase I of the System, subject
to the direction and oversight of the Joint Cooperative Committee, the governing
boards, and the general managers in accordance with this Agreement. The Water
District shall serve as the contracting authority for the Districts and contract directly with
all professionals, construction firms and other outside contractors. The Water District
shall execute and administer the contracts and make all payments thereunder subject to
the terms and conditions herein.
19. System Employees, The Water District shall recruit, select, employ, and
supervise all staff employees specifically retained to provide services for the planning,
design and construction of Phase I of the System, including but not limited to any
temporary, part time or limited term employees. The Water District shall be considered
the employer of any and all such employees. The Sanitation District's role with respect
to such employees is limited to reimbursing the Water District for the Sanitation District's
share of the System employees' salaries and benefits as described in Section 3 of this
Agreement. The Water District shall defend and fully indemnity the Sanitation District
against, and hold the Sanitation District and its respective employees and agents
completely free and harmless from, any cost, expense, claim, demand, judgment, loss,
injury and/or liability of any kind or nature other than as caused by Sanitation District
negligence asserted by staff employees specifically retained to provide services for the
System.
20. Reimbursement and Grant Receipts. The Water District shall pay for
consultants, contractors, staff and other project related costs in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement. The Water District shall prepare quarterly statements of
project expenses based on its cost of staff and outside services, plus the Sanitation
District's cost of staff and outside services using only those staff charges allowed by
each respective General Manager. The Water District shall receive all grant receipts
and credit the project ledger for the grant receipts as they are received. The Water
District shall invoice the Sanitation District and Sanitation District shall pay for fifty
percent (50%) of the expended amount (the cost of both staff and outside services),
less fifty percent (50%) of the grant receipts, and less the cost of services provided
directly by Sanitation District.
21. Lands, Easements and Rights-of-Way. Under the Joint Cooperative
Committee's direction, the Water District shall obtain all lands, easements and rights-of-
way necessary for Phase I of the System's construction and operation.
22. Permits and Approvals. Under the Joint Cooperative Committee's direction,
the Water District shall obtain all permits and approvals necessary for the construction
and operation of Phase I of the System. All permits and approvals are to be held in the
Water District's name.
s- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
23. Plans and Specifications. The Water District, under the direction and
supervision of the Joint Cooperative Committee and in consultation with the Sanitation
District, shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, the plans and specifications for all
components of the System, and accomplish all other work necessary for the System's
design and engineering.
24. Preparation of Contract Documents. Upon receiving the Joint Cooperative
Committee's approval of plans and specifications for each Phase I System component
construction project, the Water District shall prepare all contract documents. Each set
of contract documents shall include, among other things, provisions requiring that the
contractor do the following:
(a) name the Water District and the Sanitation District as additional
named insureds under any and all insurance policies required by
the contract documents;
(b) indemnify and hold harmless the Water District and the Sanitation
District for any and all injuries or damages caused by the contractor
in connection with the construction of the System components; and
(c) name the Water District as beneficiary under any contractor bonds
required by the contract documents.
25. Advertisement of Bids. Upon receiving the Joint Cooperative Committee's
approval of the plans and specifications, or if the engineer's estimate and lowest
responsible bid are with the limits described in Sections II B.9.0 and B.12 of this
Agreement for each System component project, the Water District shall publicly
advertise for construction bids for that project.
26. Construction Management. Once the Joint Cooperative Committee has
selected a firm or staff to provide construction management services, the Water District
shall contract for such services for each construction project. On completion of
construction for each project, Water District's General Manager shall recommend to the
Joint Cooperative Committee to accept construction if he or she determines that the
component was constructed and completed in accordance with the plans and
specifications therefore.
27. Reports and Budgets. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall prepare, or
cause to be prepared, an annual report of the System's development costs on or before
the first of November for each year. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall
recommend to the governing boards the annual budget for the development of the
System.
28. Contribution for Activated Sludge Secondary Plant Upgrades. The Water
District shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the activated sludge secondary plant
upgrade and the Ellis Avenue Pump Station rehabilitation described in Section 32 of this
Agreement.
-10- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
29. Indemnity. The Water District agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the Sanitation District from any claims, liabilities, costs and expenses in
connection with any property damage or personal injury caused by the Water District, its
employees, consultants, contractors, sub-contractors and designated representatives, in
the course of operating on the Sanitation District's property pursuant to the licenses and
lease as described in Sections 33, 34 and 35.
D. The Sanitation District's Planning, Design and Construction
Obligations.
30. Payment of Invoices. Sanitation District shall have the right to review and
confirm that invoices described in Section 20 of this Agreement are delivered in
conformance with the terms of this Agreement. The Water District shall present a
warrant register and backup invoices to the Sanitation District one day prior to the Water
District's issuance of checks. The Sanitation District shall wire 50 percent (50%) of the
value of the check to be issued the following day to the Water District. If during review
of the warrant register the Sanitation District disputes any payment, upon agreement of
both general managers the Water District shall reimburse the Sanitation District for the
disputed amount within fifteen (15) days.
31. Trickling Filter Upgrades. Concurrent with construction of the Phase I
System facilities, the Sanitation District, at its sole cost and expense, shall rehabilitate
the existing trickling fifters to increase capacity and reliability by installing standby
electrical power and new trickling fitter secondary clarifiers at an estimated project cost
of forty-four million dollars ($44,000,000) (in December 2000 dollars).
32. Activated Sludge Secondary Plant and Ellis Avenue Pump Station
Upgrades. Concurrent with construction of the Phase I System facilities, the Sanitation
District shall (a) upgrade the Activated Sludge Secondary Plant by installing standby
power at an estimated project cost of six million dollars ($6,000,000) and (b) rehabilitate
the Ellis Avenue Pump Station at an estimated project cost of two million dollars
($2,000,000) (in December 2000 dollars). The Sanitation District and the Water District
shall each pay fifty percent (50%) of the actual cost of this standby-power installation for
the Activated Sludge Secondary Plant and the rehabilitation of the Ellis Avenue Pump
Station. In order to contribute its fifty percent (50%) share, he Water District shall pay
fifty percent (50%) of each and every progress payment and other payment that the
Sanitation District tenders for design and construction of the Activated Sludge
Secondary Plant upgrade and Ellis Avenue Pump Station rehabilitation as described in
this paragraph.
33. Lease of the Eight-Acre Property. The Parties shall enter into a lease
("Lease"), in a form that is mutually acceptable to the Parties, whereby the Sanitation
District shall lease to the Water District up to eight acres of the property described on
Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Eight Acre Property"), subject to all the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement. During the term of the Lease, the Water District
shall use the Eight Acre Property for the purpose of constructing and operating the AWf
facilities, the influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping. The Parties
- 11 - Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
shall determine by mutual agreement which portion of the Eight Acre Property is
necessary to construct and operate the AWT facilities, the influent screening facilities,
landscaping and associated piping, and the Lease shall be limited to the designated
portion. The rent under the Lease shall be one dollar ($1.00) per year. The rent is set
at the nominal sum of one dollar ($1.00) per year because the Sanitation District will
otherwise receive adequate and substantial consideration from the Water District under
this Agreement. As the landlord and property owner, the Sanitation District shall assist
the Water District in obtaining any permits or approvals that the Water District may seek
from governmental agencies in connection with the construction and operation of the
AWT facilities, the influent screening facilities, the landscaping and associated piping on
the Eight Acre Property. Upon the Water District's request, the Sanitation District shall
file or cause to be filed any application, documentation or information necessary to
obtain such permits or governmental approvals.
34. Grant of License to the Water District to Use an Entrance on the Sanitation
District's Property. The Sanitation District hereby grants to the Water District, its
employees, consultants, contractors, sub-contractors and designated agents and
representatives, a license to enter upon, occupy, and use one of the Sanitation District's
entrances, to be selected by the Sanitation District in its sole discretion, for employee
access and deliveries associated with the System, including chemicals and other
materials. In no event, however, shall access for construction workers be permitted at
the Sanitation District's main entrance located on Ellis Avenue at the on/off ramps to the
Interstate 405 freeway. The term of the license to use an entrance shall begin upon
execution of this Agreement and continue until this Agreement expires of is terminated.
35. Grant of License to the Water District for Temporary Construction Staging
Areas. The Sanitation District hereby grants to the Water District, its employees,
consultants, contractors, sub-contractors and designated agents and representatives, a
license to use temporary construction staging areas outside the Eight Acre Property as
may be necessary for construction of the AWT facilities, the influent screening facilities,
landscaping and associated piping as long as these staging operations do not
unreasonably interfere, in the Sanitation District's sole discretion, with the Sanitation
District's operations. The term of the license for temporary construction staging areas
shall begin upon execution of this Agreement and continue until the AWT facilities, the
influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping are constructed. Once
the AWT facilities, the influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping
are constructed, the Water District shall remove or cause to be removed by its
contractors all equipment and structures from the temporary staging areas and it shall
no longer have access thereto.
III. Operation and Maintenance.
A. The Water District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations.
36. Water District Operation and Maintenance. The Water District shall, at its
sole cost and expense, provide, or cause to be provided, all tools, equipment, vehicles,
- 12- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
materials, supplies and qualified personnel necessary to operate and maintain the AW'f
facilities, the GWR Pipeline, the seawater barrier injection wells and all other System
facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement. The Water District shall collect and
maintain operating fees and charges for these purposes. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Water District shall not be obligated to operate and maintain the
Sanitation District's trickling filters, Activated Sludge Secondary Plant and Ellis Avenue
Pump Station that may be upgraded pursuant to Sections 31 and/or 32 of this
Agreement.
37. Continuous Operation of the AWT Facilities. At Its sole cost, the Water
District shall operate the AWT facilities to produce water for the beneficial use. During
Phase I of System, the Water District shall treat as much of the water as possible
through the AWT facilities. Without limiting the foregoing, beginning two years after
start up, the Water District shall continuously operate the AWT facilities at a minimum
continuous treated flow of 5 mgd each day, increasing to 30 mgd as follows:
Year(January 1) Minimum Continuous Treated
Flow Net
2 yrs. after startup 5 mgd
2009 10 mgd
2012 20 mgd
2015 30 mgd
The Water District shall make every effort to operate the System without total
shutdowns for maintenance. No total shutdown (excluding regulatory shutdown) will be
permitted without a 48-hour written notice to the Sanitation District and receipt of the
Sanitation District's concurrence. In the event of a dispute, the Parties shall exercise
the procedures described in Section 67.2. In the event the groundwater basin is unable
to receive the minimum continuous flow, the Parties shall meet to determine other ways
to provide the Sanitation District with hydraulic relief.
38. Guaranteed Capability to Handle Peak Storm-Related Flows. Starting with
the second wet weather season or portion of season after the System begins operating,
the Water District shall routinely operate all System components, and otherwise
maintain all System components in a state of readiness, so as to guarantee that the
System has the capability at all times to accept and process up to one hundred (100)
mgd secondary treated wastewater to be generated by the Sanitation District during
times of peak level storm flows. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Sanitation District
agrees in advance in writing, the Water District may temporarily reduce the System's
capability to accept, during peak storm conditions, one hundred (100) mgd. The
Sanitation District must approve in writing both the amount and duration of any such
reduction in capability.
39. Electrical Power Supply. Throughout the life of the System, the Water
District shall take all reasonable and prudent actions to ensure a reliable source of
electrical power to preclude disruption of System operations by securing and
maintaining two independent 66-kV lines from Southern California Edison, or equivalent
provider, for the System's use.
- 13- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
40. NPDES Permit. The Water District shall obtain and maintain a valid
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit authorizing the
discharge of treated water from the System to the receiving waters of the State of
California. The Water District shall, at its sole cost and expense, (a) defend any
enforcement actions that may arise out of alleged violations of the NPDES permit
caused by operation of the System, and (b) pay any fines levied as a result of any such
enforcement actions and/or any amounts tendered in settlement of such enforcement
actions; excluding activities attributed to the Sanitation District's operations.
41. Water Reclamation Permit. The Water District shall obtain and maintain a
valid Water Reclamation Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board
authorizing the treatment and reuse of the System's water.
42. System Employees. The Water District shall recruit, select, employ, and
supervise all staff employees and/or contractors retained to provide services for the
operation and maintenance of the System, including but not limited to any regular
fulltime, temporary, part-time, or limited term employees. The Water District shall
employ qualified staff and/or contractors in accordance with the staffing plan described
in Section 43 of this Agreement. The Water District shall be the employer of any and all
such employees. The Water District shall defend and fully indemnify the Sanitation
District against, and hold the Sanitation District and its respective employees and
agents completely free and harmless from, any cost, expense, claim, demand,
judgment, loss, injury and/or liability of any kind or nature asserted by staff employees
specifically employed to provide services for the System. Sanitation District must
approve the use of outside and/or private contractors to .operate System, including
bonding, performance, and insurance requirements and concur with the selection of the
recommended private contractor.
43. Staffing Plan. The Parties shall develop a staffing plan for operation and
maintenance of the System that describes the System's employees ("Staffing Plan") a
minimum of twenty-four (24) months prior to the anticipated start-up date of the AWf
facilities. In recruiting, selecting, employing, and supervising staff employees and/or
contractors for the operation and maintenance of the System, the Water District shall
follow and implement the approved Staffing Plan, as approved by the Water District's
Board of Directors. Sanitation District must approve the use of contractors to operate
System, including all performance criteria.
44. Regular Meetings. During operation of the System, supervisory personnel
from both Parties shall meet regularly to review operational and maintenance issues.
During the first two years of the System's operation, these meetings shall occur at least
monthly. Thereafter, the meetings shall occur at least quarterly.
45. System Modifications. During operation of the System, the Water District
shall not modify, either temporarily or permanently, any aspect of the System that would
alter the System's intended rated capacity.
- 14- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
46. Compliance with Laws. In operating, managing, maintaining and repairing
the System's facilities, the Water District shall strictly comply with requirements of all
permits and licenses and all applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances,
rules and regulations governing the operation and maintenance of the System. If for
any reason such compliance is beyond the Water District's control, the Water District
shall notify the Sanitation District of that fact and the circumstances and details of
non-compliance.
47. Monthly and Annual Reports. The Water District shall submit to the
Sanitation District a monthly report summarizing the System's operation and
maintenance activities. The Water District shall also submit to the Sanitation District an
annual report summarizing the System's operation and maintenance activities. The
Water District shall also provide such other written or oral reports regarding System
management, operation, maintenance, asset management, and repair and long-term
rehabilitation or replacement as the Sanitation District may reasonably request from
time to time.
48. Annual Budgets. The Water District shall prepare and submit an annual
budget for the System's operation and maintenance and capital expenditures to the
Sanitation District for review. The Water District shall submit the annual budget for
review each year not later than sixty (60) days before the Water District's governing
board approves the Water District's annual budget.
49. Accounting. The Water District shall prepare and maintain accurate and
complete books and accounting records for operation of the System in accordance with
practices established by or consistent with those utilized by the Controller of the State of
California for public agencies. Such books and accounts shall be maintained on the
basis of a 'fiscal year'. The Water District shall provide to the Sanitation District annual
accounting reports. The Sanitation District shall have the right to audit such books and
accounts at any reasonable time at their sole expense.
50. Records. The Water District shall prepare and maintain accurate and
complete records of all materials provided and services performed in connection with
the operations and maintenance of the System. The Sanitation District shall have the
right to inspect and copy such records during regular business hours on reasonable
notice at their sole expense.
51. Regulatory Reporting. The Water District shall have sole responsibility for
preparing and filing all reports in connection with the System that may be required by
applicable laws and/or regulatory agencies.
52. Annual Independent Audit. The Water District, at its sole expense, shall on
an annual basis retain an independent auditor or a team of Sanitation District and Water
District supervisors to perform an audit of the System's operations. The purpose of the
audit is to assure the long-term adequacy of the System. The Water District shall direct
the auditor to make its audit report available to the Sanitation District.
-15- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
53. Insurance. The Water District shall furnish and maintain, as a cost and
expense of the System operations and maintenance, insurance policies, covering all
possible liability, damages, costs, losses, claims, and expenses, resulting from or
connected with the System's operation and maintenance, including the following
minimum coverage:
(a) Workers' Compensation In accordance with the Workers'
Compensation Act of the State of
California —Minimum of$1,000,000.
(b) Public Liability, in the form of $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit
either Comprehensive per occurrence, with $5,000,000
General Liability or aggregate for bodily injury, death and
Commercial Liability written property damage
on a per-occurrence basis
(c) Automobile Liability, $1,000,000 combined single limit per
including non-owned and occurrence
hired vehicles
The Water District shall name the Sanitation District as an additional named insured on
all of the above listed policies. The Water District shall furnish certificates of insurance
showing coverage to the Sanitation District. Where the Water District, by its Board of
Directors approval, has elected to partially or fully self-insure any of the above required
coverages, it shall provide to the Sanitation District all the relevant written policies and
actions to establish said programs. In the event the Water District can obtain any of the
above coverages as part of its insurance policies of the same coverage for its other
operations, it shall obtain a premium cost allocation of any such policy between system
operations and other operations. The allocated costs for System operations insurance
coverage shall be charged to the System.
54. Green Acres Project Service To The Sanitation District. The Water District
shall deliver Green Acres Project reclaimed water to the Sanitation District on the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
54.1 Cost of Reclaimed Water. The Sanitation District shall pay to the
Water District one hundred and fifty dollars ($150) per acre-foot for Green Acres Project
reclaimed water that the Water District delivers to the Sanitation District during the
period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. The rate shall be adjusted annually
thereafter using the lower of the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles area or
2.5%.
54.2 Quality of Reclaimed Water. The Green Acres Project reclaimed
water to be provided to the Sanitation District by the Water District shall be reclaimed by
way of tertiary treatment, including filtration, chlorination or other effective disinfection
treatment that is acceptable to both of the Parties. Such water shall be suitable for use
by the Sanitation District for process cooling water, chemical dilution water, and
- 16- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement
landscape irrigation water, and other industrial uses at its reclamation plants (except
boiler feed water). The Water District represents and warrants that all reclaimed water
to be delivered to the Sanitation District pursuant to this Agreement shall conform to all
local, State and Federal laws, including, but not limited to, all present and future
requirements established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa
Ana Region. The Water District shall also meet any applicable requirements of the
State and/or local Health Departments, and/or any Federal, State or local agencies,
which may have authority to establish minimum standards for the quality of reclaimed
water.
54.3 Minimum Delivery of Reclaimed Water. The Water District shall
deliver, and the Sanitation District shall accept, reclaimed water from the Green Acres
Project on a continuous basis of not less than 2.9 mgd average, on a yearly basis. The
Water District, with thirty (30) minutes advance notice to the Sanitation District, may
suspend deliveries to the Sanitation District if turbidity in the secondary effluent from the
Sanitation District does not meet the requirements defined in Section 58. The Water
District shall resume deliveries when the secondary effluent turbidity meets Section 58
standards for a period of at least two (2) hours. After January 13, 2012, the minimum
average daily requirement shall be waived.
54.4 Ownership of Reclaimed Water Facilities. Sanitation District shall
own, operate and maintain at its own expense all reclaimed water facilities that lie within
the boundaries of its two plants, except for the Water District's metering facilities at
Sanitation District's Plant No. 2. Water District shall own, operate and maintain at its
own expense all other reclaimed water facilities that are part of the Green Acres Project.
Sanitation District shall, on behalf of the Water District, be responsible to operate and
maintain the reclaimed water service pipeline and its appurtenances that lie within the
right-of-way of the Sanitation District's Interplant Utility Corridor. Sanitation District shall
be reimbursed by Water District for costs incurred for operating and maintaining the
pipeline.
55. Quality, of Reclamation Plant Waste. The Water District warrants that the
quality of waste stream discharge from the AWT facilities and the Green Acres Project
reclamation plant shall conform to all of the Sanitation District's current and future water
quality standards and regulations. In addition, the temperature of the discharge to the
Sanitation District's disposal facilities shall not exceed a maximum temperature, as
designated by the appropriate regulatory agencies or the Sanitation District.
56. Water Quality Monitoring. The Water District shall establish, implement and
maintain a water quality monitoring program for the following: (a) the wastewater
delivered from the Sanitation District to the Water District pursuant to Section 58 of this
Agreement; (b) the waste streams discharged from the AWT facilities and the Green
Acres Project reclamation plant and delivered to the Sanitation District pursuant to
Section 61 of this Agreement; and (c) the reclaimed water that the Water District will
deliver to the Sanitation District pursuant to Subsection 54.3 of this Agreement. The
monitoring program shall include daily turbidity samples for all brine wastes.
- 17- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
57. Independent Contractor. The Parties agree that, in operating and
maintaining the System, the Water District is, and shall be, acting at all times as an
independent contractor, and all employees of the Water District are solely employees of
the Water District and not the agents or employees of the Sanitation District.
B. The Sanitation District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations.
58. Delivery and Quality of Wastewater. The Sanitation District shall deliver
secondary treated sewage from the Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. 1 to the
Water District for the System and Green Acres Project. In Phase I of System, the
Sanitation District shall meet the following daily average criteria: The quality of the
secondary treated wastewater shall comply with the latest adopted version of the
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 entitled "Water Recycling
Criteria", Sanitation District's 1999 Strategic Plan and additional permit requirements
that may be imposed on the System or Green Acres Project by the State Department of
Health Services or Regional Water Quality Control Board. In cases of conflict between
these documents, the more restrictive numbers shall apply. All quantity data are
approximate and may vary according to season and the Parties acknowledge that
operational variation beyond the reasonable control of the Sanitation District may result
in quantity and quality changes. Sanitation District shall have the right to make
emergency changes, and shall promptly notify Water District.
Source of Plant No. 1 Phase I Phase I
Secondary Treated Normal Operation Peak Wet
Wastewater (Includes GreenAcres Project) Weather Conditions
Activated Sludge Plant: Up to 80 mgd Up to 80 mgd
Trickling Filters: Up to 24 mgd Up to 48 mgd
Total: Up to 104 mgd Total: Up to 128 mgd
The Sanitation 1 District shall use its best efforts to direct the highest quality
wastewater to the Sanitation District's Plant No. 1 for treatment and transmission to the
System, bypassing lower quality wastewater where possible to the Sanitation's District
Plant No. 2. The "quality" of wastewater for purposes of this section is based on those
factors that adversely affect the performance of the System or Green Acres Project,
such as total dissolved solids. The Sanitation District shall confer with the Water District
if the Sanitation District intends to make a major change in the source of wastewater for
Plant No. 1, at least thirty (30)days before such a change.
59. Industrial Pretreatment and Pollution Source Control Program. The
Sanitation District shall maintain a comprehensive industrial wastewater pretreatment
and pollutant source control program for controlling the discharge of wastes from point
sources that could adversely affect the System's water quality or production. The
-Is- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
Sanitation District shall obtain the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's
approval of the source control program.
60. Acceptance of Waste Brine, Microfilter and Green Acres Project Return
Flows. The Sanitation District shall, at no charge to the Water District, accept waste
streams discharged from the AWT facilities according to the following capacities:
Waste Reject Stream Phase I Phase I
Normal Operation Peak Wet Weather
(Includes Green Acres Prciect) Conditions
Microfiltration Return Up to 12 mgd Up to 24 mgd
(To Plant No. 1)
Brine (To Outfall) Up to 16 mgd Up to 16 mgd
Green Acres Project Return Up to 1.5 mgd Up to 1.5 mgd'
(To Plant No. 1)
GAP return may be zero because GAP plant is anticipated to be out-of-service
during the winter.
In addition, the Sanitation District shall accept "start-up" water generated by the
AWf facilities and periodic well "regeneration water". Start-up shall be closely
coordinated with the Sanitation District to prevent plant disruptions. Well regeneration
water shall not be delivered during rainy periods or anticipated rainy periods.
61. Further Conditioning or Treatment of Brine to be Discharged to the
Sanitation District's Outfall. If the Sanitation District's outfall NPDES permit requires
conditioning or further treatment of brine before it can be discharged to the Sanitation
Districts outfall, (a) the Parties shall each pay fifty percent (50%) of the capital costs of
any system or equipment necessary to perform such conditioning or further treatment,
and (b) the Sanitation District shall pay all operation and maintenance costs of such
conditioning or further treatment.
62. Costs of Secondary Wastewater Treatment. The Sanitation District shall
pay all operations and maintenance costs of providing secondary treated wastewater
according to the specification described in Section 58 of this Agreement.
63. Costs of NDMA Treatment. Notwithstanding the Water District's obligation
to operate and maintain the System at its sole cost as described above in Sections 36
and 37, the Sanitation District shall pay fifty percent (50%) of whatever additional
operation and maintenance costs (less cost of disinfection only), if any, that are directly
attributable to removal of Nitrogen-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the System's AWf
facilities.
is- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
IV. Term and Termination.
64. Term. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect for fifty (50) years
after its effective date, or such earlier time as may be terminated by one or both of the
Parties in accordance with Section 65 or Section 66 of this Agreement. This Agreement
shall be reviewed by the Parties from time to time as appropriate.
65. Termination During Final Design. Either Party may unilaterally terminate
this Agreement during final design but before a contract has been awarded for
construction of the GWR Pipeline or the Advanced Water Treatment Facility with the
exception of the small portion of the GWR Pipeline in the parking area of the County's
Lacy Parking Facility. In the event one Party elects to terminate this Agreement during
final design, it shall reimburse the other Party for out of pocket final design costs
(excluding grant funds) if the project is then terminated or ten million dollars
($10 million), whichever is less. Costs for planning and project development, incurred
prior to March 28, 2001, shall not be reimbursed. Both Parties may terminate this
Agreement by mutual agreement during final design but before a contract has been
awarded for construction of the GWR Pipeline or the Advanced Water Treatment
Facility, with the exception of the small portion of the GWR Pipeline in the parking area
of the County's Lacy Parking Facility. Upon termination, by mutual agreement, the
Parties shall have no further obligations under this Agreement, except for financial
obligations that were incurred prior to termination.
66. Termination After Construction Has Commenced. This Agreement may be
terminated by mutual agreement of both Parties after construction has commenced on
the GWR Pipeline (approximate 17r" Street to Katella Avenue) or the Advanced Water
Treatment Facility. Upon termination of this Agreement by mutual agreement, the
Water District shall, under the direction of the Joint Cooperative Committee, sell off or
liquidate the System and all facilities and appurtenances thereto. The Water District
shall also remove all System facilities constructed on the Sanitation District's property.
The proceeds of selling off or liquidating the System shall be used first to repay any of
the System's outstanding debt obligations. The remainder, if any, shall be divided
equally between the Parties.
If both Parties agree to mutually terminate this Agreement, the Water District will
be provided the opportunity to purchase any facilities that have been constructed for the
GWR System from the Sanitation District at a reasonable price. In addition, Water
District will be provided the opportunity to purchase land or easements from the
Sanitation District that were previously used for the GWR System at a reasonable price.
V. Default of Operational Obligations.
67. Default and Consequences.
67.1 Condition of Default. Any material breach of this Agreement by either
Party that prevents the operation of the System shall constitute a condition of default. In
-20- Draft 27
• Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
the event of such a default, the non-defaulting Party may give the defaulting Party a
written notice of default.
67.2 Dispute Resolution. In the event that a notice of default issues pursuant to
subsection 67.1, staffs of both agencies shall meet and use their best efforts to settle
any dispute, claim, question or disagreement arising from or relating to this Agreement,
a breach thereof, or the notice of default.. To that end, staffs of both agencies shall
consult and negotiate with each other in good faith and, recognizing their mutual
interests, attempt to reach a just and equitable solution satisfactory to both Parties. If
the Parties do not reach such a solution within a period of 30 days after the notice of
default issues, then the Parties shall convene a meeting of the Joint Cooperative
Committee within 60 days after the notice of default issues and attempt to settle the
dispute, claim, question or disagreement before the Joint Cooperative Committee at the
meeting. If the Parties do not settle the dispute, claim, question or disagreement within
five (5) calendar days after the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting, either Party may
pursue any and all legal and equitable remedies that may be available.
67.3 Consequence of Water District Default. In the event that a Water District
default prevents the operation of System so that Sanitation Districts guaranteed wet
weather peak and minimum daily flows, described in Section 37 and 38, cannot be
maintained and the remedies described in Section 67.2 have been exhausted, the
Sanitation District may, in its sole and absolute discretion, assume the right and
responsibility to operate and maintain System. In this event, Water District shall
reimburse Sanitation District for the cost of operation and maintenance of System, and
Sanitation District shall continue to deliver product water to the Water District.
67.4 Consequence of Sanitation District Default. In the event that Sanitation
District cannot deliver secondary treated water for System, Sanitation District shall pay
for imported water to maintain the Seawater Barrier. The added cost of substituted
water shall be calculated as the cost of imported water less the Operating and
Maintenance charges of producing the water through the GWR System.
67.5 Specific Performance. Without limiting the preceding subsection 67.3, the
Parties hereto acknowledge that money damages will not be an adequate remedy for a
default by the Parties hereto on certain obligations hereunder. In recognition thereof,
the Water District hereby specifically agrees and consents to the remedy of specific
performance in the event that the Water District, whether by official action or otherwise,
defaults in its obligations under Sections 37 and 38 hereof. In recognition thereof, the
Sanitation District hereby specifically agrees and consents to the remedy of specific
performance in the event that the Sanitation District, whether by official action or
otherwise, defaults in its obligations under Section 58 hereof.
VI. Miscellaneous
68. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in default where failure
or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by
-21 - Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, a
regulatory government agency or other cause, without fault and beyond the reasonable
control of such Party. If any such events shall occur, the time for performance by either
party of any of its obligations hereunder shall be extended by the parties for the period
of time that such events prevented such performance.
68.1 The Sanitation District's Indemnity For Negligent Acts or Omissions
Related to Construction. The Sanitation District shall fully indemnify the Water District
against, and hold the Water District and its respective directors, Joint Cooperative
Committee members, employees and agents completely free and harmless from, any
cost, expense, claim, demand, judgment, loss, injury and/or liability of any kind or
nature, including personal or bodily injury, death or property damage, that may arise
from any grossly negligent or intentional act or omission of the Sanitation District related
to construction of Phase I of the System.
68.2 The Water District's Indemnity. The Water District shall fully indemnify the
Sanitation District against, and hold the Sanitation District and its respective directors,
Joint Cooperative Committee members, employees and agents completely free and
harmless from, any cost, expense, claim, demand, judgment, loss, injury and/or liability
of any kind or nature, including personal or bodily injury, death or property damage, that
may arise from any grossly negligent or intentional act or omission of the Water District
related to the System's construction, management, operation, maintenance or repair,
except for costs, expenses, claims, demands, judgments, losses, injuries and/or liability
arising from any grossly negligent or intentional act or omission of the Sanitation District
related to construction of the System.
69. Notices. All notices to the Sanitation District required or permitted under
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when delivered in
person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to:
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Attention: General Manager
With a copy to:
District General Counsel, who is presently:
Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq.
Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart
701 South Parker Street, Suite 8000
Orange, CA 92868
-22- Draft 27
• Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
All notices to the Water District required or permitted under this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when delivered in person or deposited in
the United States mail, postage prepaid, to:
Orange County Water District
10500 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attention: General Manager
With a copy to:
District General Counsel, who is presently:
Clark Ide, Esq.
General Counsel
Orange County Water District
10500 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
70. Successors And Assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall
inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs,
representatives, successors and assigns.
71. Further Acts and Assurances. The Parties agree to execute, acknowledge
and deliver any and all additional papers, documents and other assurances, and shall
perform any and all acts and things reasonably necessary, in connection with the
performance of the obligations hereunder and to carry out the intent of the Parties.
72. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of
convenience and reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of
this Agreement nor in any way affect this Agreement. Words of any gender in this
Agreement shall be held to include any other gender and words in the singular number
shall be held to include the plural when the sense so requires.
73. Severability. Should it be found that any part of this Agreement is illegal or
unenforceable, such part or parts of this Agreement shall be of no force nor effect and
this Agreement shall be treated as if such part or parts had not been inserted.
74. Entire Agreement. All previous negotiations had between the Parties hereto
and/or their agents or representatives with respect to this Agreement are merged herein
and this Agreement alone fully and completely expresses the Parties' rights and
obligations.
75. Modifications In Writing. This Agreement shall not be modified in any
manner except by an instrument in writing executed by the Parties or their respective
successors in interest.
-23- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
76. Interpretation. Each of the Parties hereby waives any provisions of law to
the effect that an ambiguity in a contract or agreement should be interpreted against the
Party that drafted the contract, agreement or instrument.
77. Governing Law. This Contract shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of California.
78. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create
any third-party beneficiaries to the Agreement, and no person or entity other than the
Parties, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized
to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.
79. Assignment. Neither Party may assign its interest in this Agreement without
the prior written consent of the other Party.
80. Representation and Warranties. No representations or warranties are made
or have been relied upon by either Party other than those expressly set forth herein, if
any.
-24- Draft 27
Groundwater Replenishment System
Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
By:
Chair, Board of Directors
Date:
By:
Secretary, Board of Directors
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas L. Woodruff
District Counsel
Orange County Sanitation District
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
By:
President, Board of Directors
Date:
By:
General Manager
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Clark Ida
General Counsel
Orange County Water District
-25- Draft 27
b.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
q
® Table of Contents
Section 1 -Overview...................................................................................................................1
Financial Report-
.d Section 2-Joint Operating Budget Review
e Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................................I
DivisionalContributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2
Comparisonof Expenses by Department..............................................................................3
Summaryof Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................6
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process.....................................................................8
r
Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9
Section 3-Capital Improvement Program Review
Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life........................6
Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area
Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas....................................................................I
Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2
d Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3
RevenueArea No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4
Section 5— Self Insurance Budget Review.
General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................I
Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
r
W
W
W
W
Overview
Mid-Year Financial Report
December 31, 2001
The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2001-02 mid-year comprehensive
financial report. This report provides the Directors, staff, and the general public with a
comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District and reports on the
status of all capital projects in progress. A summary of the sections contained within
this report is provided below.
Joint Operating Budget Review: At December 31, 2001, 47.76 percent, or$24.91
million of the 2001-02 net joint operating budget of $52.16 million has been expended.
Net operating expenses increased by $1.24 million from the same period last year,
primarily due to increased salary, wages, and benefits costs as a result of an average
increase of 5 percent in salaries of current employees and a$240,000 increase in cost
® resulting from the addition of ten full-time equivalent employees. Revenues are
essentially the same as last year, with only a $75,000 increase.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 2001 is $575.42 based on flows of
43.29 billion gallons, or 235.25 million gallons per day. This is $3.86, or 0.68 percent
above the budgeted cost per million gallons of $571.56. This higher cost per million
gallons is due to flows being 5.90 percent lower than the budgeted amount of 250
million gallons per day which is offset by net expenses being 4.49 percent or$1.17
milion lower than the proportionate budget through December 31, 2001.
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 2001 include:
® • Inter District Sewer Use Revenue—These usage charges are comparatively low at
$382,700, or 25.51 percent of the $1,500,000 budget, through December 31
because of lower than anticipated discharge levels by other agencies.
• Rent and Lease Revenue— Lease revenue is at $15,800, or 12.13 percent of the
$130,000 budget, due to the cancellation of a lease for space which is now needed
for the Groundwater Replenishment Project.
• Power Sales Revenue — Power sales revenue is at $95,600, or 15.93 percent of the
$600,000 budget, because of a reduction in the production and sale of electricity
resulting from the rates for purchasing natural gas and the need to rehabilitate our
digester gas system.
• Salaries. Waces and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 50.08
percent of budget through December 31 while staffing was 65 full-time equivalents
(FTE's), or 11.32 percent below the total 574 FTE's approved in the 2001-02
budget. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget at
year-end.
Section 1 - Page 1
u
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
• Memberships—Membership expense totaled $135,700, or 72.92 percent of the
$186,100 budget, as of December 31 because many of the District's memberships
are paid in the first half of each year.
• Trainin —Training expense totaled $158,400, or 21.47 percent of the $737,700 `r
budget, as of December 31 because the majority of the District's training programs
are scheduled to occur in the last half of the year.
• Contractual Services— Overall contractual services totaled $3,832,000, or 47.66
percent of the composite $B4O40,300 budget. The overall costs for this category are
expected to stay in line with the proportionate budget through the remainder of the
fiscal year.
W
• Professional Services—Overall professional services totaled $842,000, or 36.43
percent of the composite$2,312,400 budget. Audit & Accounting services are
higher than the proportionate budget through December 31 due to the timing of
when the services are provided. Other professional services are in the planning or
request for proposal stages. It is anticipated that the overall costs for this category
will increase in the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year.
• Research & Monitoring — Research and monitoring costs totaled $858,500, or 54.43
percent of the $1,577,300 composite budget due to the timing of when annual fees
for participation in research organizations are paid. Staff expects to approximate
budget at year-end.
W
• Utilities —As of December 31, utility costs totaled $2,185,000, or 35.25 percent of
the $6,199,100 budget. The expense for natural gas is proportionately low
compared to the budget because the negotiated cost is less than was anticipated
when the budget was prepared.
W
W
W
W
W
W
Section 1 - Page 2 ,�,
Overview
r Comparison of Mid-Year Cost per Million Gallon Results
With Year-End Actuals (Budget)
Last Five Years
r
B� 575.
n.ae
MU
e� svae
SS5 BW.BO
N0.0)
NI.BO
i
_ 4W ).
315
2nd@L@H 98.98 �9Y Wor or-0z
CA, Year 2nd0, YBer Q, Yeer 0, Y. 0tr Annual
ar elm ar elm rnr .,la ar Boa ar e.ayel
As demonstrated in the preceding graph, the cost per million gallons at mid-year has
been within 2.50 percent of year-end totals for three out of the last four years. The cost
comparison for 2001-02 is consistent with this trend as the mid-year cost per million
gallons is within 0.68 percent of the budget.
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through mid-year of 2001-02, as budgeted for 2001-02,
and as actually incurred through mid-year of 2000-01. All three charts are quite similar
showing little change among the current year mid-year actual, current year budget, and
prior year mid-year actual.
More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2
provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through mid-year for
the current and two prior years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses
by department for December 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001; Section 2 — Page 4 provides a
summary of expenses by major category through December 31, 2001 and 2000;
Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item
through December 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— pages 6 and 7 provide a summary
of expenses by line item through December 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2 — Page 8
provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through December 31, 2001
and 2000; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including
total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions.
Section 1 - Page 3
2001-02 Mid-Year Report es
Capital Outlay Review: les
$160,000.000 b
$140,000,000
$120,000,000 _
$100,000,000
$80,006,000
$60,000,000 es
$40,000,096
$20,000,000 se
so
i
1/01 Actual Capital Projected 2001.02 ReNsed Estimated
Outlay-$25.968,900 Capital Outlay- 2001-02 Capital Outlay
$85,980,300 $146.585.900 se
As depicted by the preceding chart, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled
$25,968,900 or 17.72 percent of the capital outlay estimate for 2001-02 as of
December 31, 2001. Costs are proportionately low through mid-year as many projects
are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs
are expected to be $85,980,300, or 58.66 percent of budget at year-end.
Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital se
expenditures incurred for each process category and a graphical presentation on the
dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major capital improvement
purpose.
For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the
construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3 — Pages 6
through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the
project life.
Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At December 31, 2001, revenues from all
Revenue Areas totaled $67.37 million, or 14.85 percent of budget. Tax allocations and
subvention revenue, budgeted at $38.15 million, is at 44.78 percent of budget, or
$17.09 million, and Other User Fees, budgeted at $85.08 million, is at 37.18 percent of
budget, or$31.64 million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low
through mid-year because most of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts
that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the
District during the second half of the fiscal year. A pending ruling in a court case which
protests certain increases in prior years' assessed values could result in a refund of
property taxes. If the ruling says the property taxes were improperly increased in prior
years, the District's estimated portion of the refunds are estimated to be $4,491,000
and annual reductions in future property tax receipts are estimated to be $2,291,000.
se
Section 1 - Page 4 es
Overview
Interest revenue, budgeted at 38.31 million, is at $15.08 million, or 39.36 percent of
budget. This is due to the lower than anticipated interest rate yields occurring in the
first half of the year. No significant sale of capacity rights, budgeted at$6.2 million,
have been received at December 31, 2001. There currently is a pending $2.6 million
capacity sale to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. Due to the delays in
capital outlay spending, proceeds from debt issuance will be moved out to 2002-03.
Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at $5.82 million, are at 61.24 percent, or$3.57
million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities.
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $74.98 million, or 30.13 percent of
budget through December 31, 2001. The costs incurred related to capital improvement
projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer
Construction) are proportionately low at$25.97 million or 18.04 percent of budget, as
previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. All other revenues are near the
® proportionate budget through mid-year.
Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers'
compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is
utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability
® claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions
based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims
administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $1.17 million or 53.60 percent of the $2.18
million budget at December 31, while total expenses were $1.56 million or 66.61
percent of the $2.35 million budget.
Section 1 - Page 5
W
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
W
W
W
W
W
This Page Intentionally Left Blank W
W
W
v
W
W
W
W
W
W
Section 1 - Page 6
W
Joint Operating Budget Review
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Engin oing
10% OaM
ST%
Finance
6%
Info.Tech.
6%
Exec.Mgml.
4%
Tech.S.M.
15% HIB
2%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
2001-02 Budget
Engineerng
9%
O&M
Finance 57%
6%
Into.Tech.
n6
Exec.Mgml
d%
Tech.Svcs.
14% HIR
3%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000
Engineering
9%
Finance O a M
5% %
Info.Tech.
6%
Exec.Mgm1,
3°b
Tech.Svcs.
17% Wit
2%
Section 2- Page 1
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report L
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge U
For the Six Months Ended December 31,
2001-02
12/31/99 1261/00 Annual 12/31/01 u
Actual Actual Budget Actual
Flow in Million Gallons 43,932.00 45,198.00 91,250.00 43.285.85
Flow in Million Gallons per Day 238.76 245.64 250.00 236.25
General Managers Department
General Management Administration $ 16.62 $ 13.58 $ 15.10 $ 14.34
Administrative Services - - 9.40 10.32 L,I
Communications 8.75 9.00 5.68 5.78
Subtotal 25.37 22.58 30.18 30,44
Finance Department LI
Finance Administration 16.66 16.24 22.09 16.38
Accounting 16.13 14.29 16.68 17.49
Purchasing&Warehousing 10.53 11.52 13.44 13.66 i
Subtotal 43.32 42.05 52.21 47.53 V
Human Resources Department
Human Resources&Emp Development 15.84 13.40 15.95 13.14
Safety&Emergency Response 9.58 11.82 10.52 6.91
Subtotal 25.42 25.22 26A7 20.05
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 6.67 7.26 7.92 6.84
Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 43.89 41.25 35.56 43.32 L
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 42.27 38.79 43.53 42.89
Source Control 30.26 31.99 33.22 36.46
Subtotal 123.09 119.29 120.23 129.51
Engineering Department L
Engineering Administration 3.60 5.52 7.38 6.15
Planning&Design 29.71 30.51 33.23 36.06 1
Construction Management 35.41 34.84 37.73 37.46 L
Subtotal 68.72 70.87 78.34 79.67
Operations&Maintenance Department
Opns&Maint. Administration 11.05 6.74 3.00 3,27 j
O&M Process Engineering 12.50 11.99 13.31 11.91 LI
Plant No. 1 Operations 73.67 76.87 83.70 89.97
Plant No.2 Operations 100.22 113.11 116.31 125.10
Mechanical Maintenance 61.25 51.29 69.38 56.56 Is,
&Instrumentation Mtca 64.01 61.92 68.86 63.67
Central Generation 31.82 45.25 58.24 44.25
Air Quality&Special Projects 13.04 12.54 14.07 13,48
Collection Facilities Maintenance 24.90 15.85 17.86 17.22 L
Plant Facilities Maintenance 45.12 41.55 WAS 52.80
Subtotal 427.58 437.11 487.92 478.23
Information Technology Department Li
Information Technology Administration 9A1 10.26 10.66 9.36
Customer&Network Support 19.23 17.28 20.85 18.16
Programing&Database 5.80 11.57 13.31 12.62 1
Process Ctd Integration 8.83 10.65 12.82 12.59 LI
Subtotal 43.27 49.76 57.50 52.73
Total Joint Operating Expenses 756.77 766.88 852.89 838.16
Less: Cost Allocation (204.85) 209.41 229.50 (226,79) L
Net Joint Operating Requirements 551.92 557.47 623.39 612.37
Less:Revenues (63.35) (33.73) 51,84 36.95
Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 4a8.57 $ 523.74 $ 571.55 $ 575.42 L
Section 2- Page 2
L
Joint Operating Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
For the Six Months Ended December 31,
2001.02
12/31/99 12131/00 Year to Date Budget%
Department and Division Actual Actual Budget '12/31101 Realized
General Managers Department
General Management Administration $ 730,170 $ 613,844 $ 1,377,700 $ 620.800 45.06%
Administrative Services - - 858,100 446,eD5 52.08%13 405,6 Communications 384,239 518,100 250.104 4827%
Subtotal 1,114,383 1,020.483 2.753,900 1,317.809 47.85%
Finance Department
Finance Administration 731,746 734,128 2,015,900 709,236 35.18%
Pccoun8ng 708,484 645,892 1.521.700 757,221 49.76%
Puminesing&Warehousing 462.687 520,700 1,226,800 591,245 48.19%
Subtotal 1.902,917 1.900,720 4,764.400 2,057,702 43.19%
Human Resources Department
e, Human Resources It Emp Development 695,914 605,593 1,455,500 560,799 39.08%
Safety It Emergency Response 420.827 534,378 960,200 299,111 31.15%
Subtotal 1.116,741 1,139,971 2,415,700 867,910 35.93%
Technical Services Department
d Technical Services Administration 292.813 327,933 723,100 296.286 40.97%
Environmental Compliance B Monitoring 1,928.387 1,864.565 3,244,800 1,874.957 57.78%
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 1,856,809 1,753,453 3.972.300 1.856,353 46.73%
m Source Control 1,329,541 1.445,721 3.031.500 1.577,999 52.05%
Subtotal 5,407,550 5.391,672 10,971.700 5.605,594 51.09%
Engineering Department
_ Engineering Administration 158,281 249.292 673,200 265.126 39.53%
Planning B Design 1,305,217 1.378,804 3,032,500 1.560.690 51.47%
Construction Management 1,666,584 1,574,657 3,442,800 1,621,318 47.09%
Subtotal 3,019,062 3.202,763 7,148,500 3.448.134 4824%
Operations&Maintenance Department
Opns&Maint Administration 485,615 304,701 273.500 141,573 51.76%
O&M Process Engineering 549,303 541,808 1,214,400 515,555 42.45%
em Plant No.1 Operations 3.236.686 3,474,224 7,637,300 3,894.304 50.99%
Plant No.2 Operations 4,402,351 5.112,395 10,614,100 5,415.112 51.02%
Mechanical Maintenance 2.251.493 2,318,415 5,418,700 2,448,137 45A8%
Electrical&Instrumentation Mice. 2,812,260 2,798,697 6,283,100 2,756,144 43.87%
Central Generation 1,398,057 2,045,016 5,314,100 1.915.349 36.04%
Air Quality B Special Projects 572,769 566,908 1,284,300 583.345 45.42%
Collection Facilities Maintenance 1,093.741 716,430 1,629,300 745,296 45.74%
Plant Facilities Maintenance 1,982,213 1.878,013 4.854.000 2,285,675 47.09%
Subtotal 18.784,488 19,756.607 44.522,800 20,700,490 46.49%
Information Technology Department
Information Technology Administration 413,433 463.622 963,580 405,339 42.07%
Customer B Nehvork Support 844,916 781,213 1.902.920 786,180 41.31%
Pro9reming&Database 254,627 522,935 1.214,160 646.292 44.99%
Process Cm Integration 387,808 481,455 1.169,640 544.934 46.59%
Subtotal 1,900,784 2.249,225 5,250,300 2,282,743 43A8%
Total Joint Operating Expenses 33.245.925 34.661,431 77,827,300 36.280.384 46.62%
Lou: Cost Allocation (8,999,296) (9,464,780) (20,942,200) (9,773,466) 46.67%
Not Joint Operating Requirements 24.246,629 25,196.651 56,885.100 26.506.918 46.60%
Less:Revenues (2,782,924) (1,524,578) (4,730,000) (1,599,287) 33.81%
Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 21,463,705 $ 23,672,073 $ 52,155,100 $24,907,631 47.76%
Section 2-Page 3
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report W
Summary of Expenses by Major Category W
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent W
Budget Through Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining
Descrtption 2001-02 12/31/01 12/31/00 $ % Realized Budget
Salary,Wages&Benefits $43.139,600 $21,602.902 $20,252,428 $ 1,350.474 6.67% 50.08% $21,536,698
Administrative Expenses 773,100 374,169 410,825 (36.556) -8.92% 48.40% 398,931
Printing&Publication 400.300 195,564 182.429 13.135 Z20% 48.85% 204,736
Training&Meetings 990,800 267,745 377,766 (110,021) -29.12% 27.02% 723,055
Operating Expenses 6.569,700 3,053.187 3,045,296 17,891 0.59% 46.63% 3,506.513 `..
Contractual Services 8.040,300 3,832,276 3,461,108 371,168 10.72% 47.66% 4.208.024
Professional Services 2.312,400 842.437 726,551 115,856 15S5% 36.43% 1,469,963
Research&Monitoring 1,577,300 856.506 1,153.722 (295,216) -25,59% 54.43% 718.794 v
Repairs&Maintenance 5,003,300 2.136,298 1,774,176 362,122 20AI% 42.70% 2,867.002
lllili8es 6,199,100 2,184,976 2,353.686 (168,710) -7.17% 35.25% 4,014.124
Other Materials,Supplies,
and Services 2.821.400 922,324 923,444 (1,120) -0.12% 32.60% 1,899.076
Net Cost Allocation (20.042,200) (9,773,466) (9,464.780) (308.686) 325% 46_67% (11.168,734)
Net J.O.Requirements 56,885,100 26,506.918 25.196.651 1,310.267 5209E 46.60% 30.378.182 r.
Revenues (4,730,000) (1,599,287) (1,524,578) (74.709) 4.90% 33.81% (3,130,713)
Net J.0.Expenses $52.155.100 $24,907.631 $23.672.073 $ 1.235,550 5.22% 4776% $27.247,409
Gallonage Flow(MG) 91.250.00 43.285.85 45,198.00 (1,912) 4.23%
y
Gallonage Flaw(MGD) 250.00 235.25 245.64 (10.39) -4.23%
Gallonage Flow($'a 1MG) $571456 $575642 $523.74 $51.68 9.87% r
r
L
W
I
V
Section 2-Page 4 e,
Joint Operating Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase
Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease)
.. Description 2001-02 12/31101 12131/01 Budget 12131/00 $ %
Inter District Sewer Use $ 1,500.000 $ 382.678 25.51% $ 1,117,322 $ (199,863) $582,541 -291.47%
Wastehauler 450,000 224,312 49.85% 2.25.688 232,286 (7,974) -3.43%
Sludge Disposal 800,000 371,363 46.42% 428,637 329,903 41,460 12.57%
CNG Sales 375.000 155.054 41.35% 219.946 144.992 10.062 6.94%
re Swap Sales - 30 WA (30) 11,758 (11,728) .99.74%
00rer Sales - 93 N/A IN) 2,253 (2,160) -95.87%
Rents&Leases 130,000 15,764 12.13% 114.236 118,992 (103.228) -86.75%
m General Non-Operating 75.000 82.495 109.99% (7,495) 82,902 (407) -0.49%
Vehicle&Equipment 300,000 120,600 40.20% 179.400 117,960 2.640 2.24%
Parer Sales 600,000 95.567 15.93% 504.433 413,353 (317,786) -76.88%
Sampling Charges 500,000 151,331 30.27% 348,669 270,042 118,711 -43496%
Total $4,730,000 $ 1,599.287 33.81% $3,130.713 $ 1,524,578 $ 74,709 4.90%
r
m
Section 2-Page 5
W
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item u
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Expense %Fapenr Expense Increase Increase W
Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease)
Description 2001-02 12131101 1201A11 Budget 12131100 S %
Suitable.Wages&Bananas
W
Setsdas 8 Wages E 36,553,300 $ 18,482,582 50.58% $ t8,070.738 S 17,455,227 $ 1,027,335 5.89%
Employee Benefits:
Refinment 1.754,100 W8,T74 50.67% 80.326 834,92D 53.854 6.45%
Group lnsunnrea 4,347,900 1,966,153 45.22% 2,381,747 1.727,360 23B.793 13.82% r
Tuition Reimbursement 74.300 66,514 89.52% 7.786 34.300 32,214 9392%
U d om,Rental 72100 39.943 55.40% 32,157 35.754 4,189 11.72%
Workers'Compensation 317.500 158,801 50.00% 15817% 155.003 3.795 2.45% r,
Unampbymentimunnce 20,300 155 0.76% 20,145 9.864 (9,709) -98_43%
Total Benefits 6,586,300 3.120,340 47.38% 3.465.960 2.797,201 323.139 11.55%
Salaries,Wages&Benefits 43,139,600 21.602,902 50_08% 21,538,698 20252,428 1.350.474 6_67% r
Mad,Stagily.&Swim
Administrable Enpereas
Memberships 186,100 135,698 72.92% 50,402 149,301 (13,603) -9.11%
Office Exp-Supplies 130,000 52.335 4026% 77,665 61,488 (9.153) -14.89%
!)flkn Expanse-Other 101 35,999 35.6056 64,911 34,854 1,035 2.97%
Smith Computer Items 256,400 119.711 46.69% 136.Bm 123,538 _ (3.827) -3.10%
Mmcr Furniture B FxWm 99.800 30.536 30.80% 69,264 41,644 (11,108) -25.67% r
Printing&Publication
Repro-4n-liouss 261.800 149,D67 56.99% 112,513 123,950 25,127 2027%
PdnOng4OutWe 64.000 28,419 44A0% 35.581 21,525 BA94 32.03% W
No6as&Ads 57.100 10.597 18.56% 46.503 32,918 (22,321) -67.81%
Photo Processing 17,600 7,461 42.39% 10,139 4,026 3,435 85.32%
Training&Meetings
Meanings, 253.100 109,356 4321% 143,744 100,007 9.349 9.35%
Tralnhg 737.700 158.309 21.47% 579.311 277.759 (119,370) -42.98%
Operating Expenses
Chemical Coagulants 1,624.000 720.577 44.37% 9W.423 720,936 (359) -0.05% `+
Susde Control 1.784,000 811,577 45.49% 972,423 81 (76,673) -8.53%
Odor Contra! 1,784,700 9W,194 54.92% 804,506 $40.402 139,792 16.63%
Chemicals-COW Oper. 15,0011) 4,396 29.31% 10.604 1,207 3,189 26421%
Afecollaneore Chemicals 16,500 3,398 20.59% 13,102 7,89I1 (4,492) -56.93% �4
Gasoline,I)easl&Oe 599,600 140,601 23.45% 458.999 219,369 (M,768) J5.91%
Toots 110.100 65,441 59.44% 44.659 61,907 3,534 5.71%
Solv,Paints&Jan.Supplies 41.500 22,033 53.09% 19.467 20,906 1,127 5.39% v
Cab Chemicals&Supplies 312,100 165,814 53.13% 146,286 208.306 (42,492) -20.40%
Oter Operatiigsuppltsa 2462M 134,037 54.44% 112.163 77,123 56,914 73.8(1%
Property Tex Fees 36,000 15,119 42.00% 20.801 - 15.119 WA
r
CO ea services
solids servicesemolal 5,500,000 3,002,718 54.59% 2,497,282 2,603,557 399,161 15.33%
Oliver Waste Disposal 668,800 212,665 31.80% 456.115 85.362 127,323 149.18%
Groundskeeping 200.000 61.782 30.89% 138218 - 61,782 WA W
Janitorial 260,000 69.010 27.60% 180.990 226.353 (157,343) -88.51%
Outside Lab Services 254.800 95.482 37.47% 159,318 99.561 (4,079) -4.10%
Oxygen Plank Open 295,000 150.235 50.93% 144,765 144,818 5.417 3.74%
Temporary Sr Aces 337,400 101,552 30.10% 235.848 - 101.552 WA W
Secudly SeMoas 199.300 47.540 23.85% 151.760 - 47,540 WA
In~t We Cleaning 54,000 - 0.00% 54,000 - - WA
Ober 281,000 91272 32.48% 189,728 301,457 (210,185) -69.72% W
(Continued)
Section 2-Page 6 u
Joint Operating Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
m Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase
Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decroaso) (Decrease)
Description 20M.02 12131/01 12I31101 Budge IV31/00 $ %
Continued'
m Professional Services
Legal 428.000 206,318 48.21% 221,662 M7.W3 (1,485) -0.71%
Audit&A=unting 74.300 44,300 59.62% 30,000 42.600 1.700 3.99%
Engineering 190,000 06.170 45.35% 103.830 127,243 (41,073) .32.28%
m Enviro Sdentift Consulting 344,500 154,928 44.97% 189,572 - 15 .928 WA
FIS Support 226.100 82,449 36.47% 143.651 - 82,449 WA
software Prgm Consulting 167,300 51,061 30.52% 116239 - 51,061 WA
Energy Consulting 62000 - 0.00% ozoo0 - - WA
Advocacy EBarts 64.000 25.000 39.06% 39,000 - 25,000 WA
Industrial Hygiene Services 45.000 0.00% 45.000 - - WA
tabor Negotiatian SeMces 36.300 4,988 13.74% 31.312 - 4,988 WA
m ADR Sericas 12.500 0.00% 12,500 - - WA
Other 662.400 187.223 2826% 475.177 348,905 (161.682) -46.34%
Research&Monitoring
s Environmental Monitoring 915.400 571,561 62.44% 343.839 898.827 (327,266) 36A1%
Air Quality Monitoring 105,000 9.200 8.76% 95.ao0 27,409 (152091 -66.43%
Research 556,900 277,745 49.87% 279,155 227.486 5D,259 22.09%
Repairs&Maintenance
Materials&Services 3,843.800 1.727,352 44.94% 2.116,448 1,363,340 364.012 26.70%
Svc.Mtc.Agreements 1.159,500 408.948 35.27% 750,554 410.336 (1,890) -0.46%
thillues
Telephone 230,000 73,453 31.94% 150.547 102.978 (29.525) -28.67%
Diesel For Generators 25,000 4.550 1820% 20,450 8.487 (3,937) -46.39%
Natuml Gas 3,795,100 1,016,818 26.79% 2,778282 1.278.949 (211 131) -20.50%
Power 1.004,000 534.357 4929% 549,643 481.982 52,375 10.87%
Water 1,066,000 555.798 52.19% 609,202 481.290 74.606 15.48%
Other Operating Supplies
m OuWde Equip Rental 84.700 34,123 4029% 50.577 79.677 (45,55,1) -57.17%
DisWO Equip Rental 248,900 120,600 48.45% 128,3D0 117.676 Z924 2.45%
Insumnce 1.750,000 563,360 32.19% 1,185,640 515,389 47,071 921%
e Freight 67200 26,937 40.08% 40263 32,073 (5.136) .16.01%
Mist.Operating Expense 205.300 85=5 41.50% 120.095 T7,707 7,498 9.65%
AOMD Operating Fees 13D,000 74,618 57.40% 55,382 66.844 7.774 11.63%
General Manager
Contingency 279.200 - 0.00% 279200 - WA
Prior year reappropriation (1,900) - 0.00% (1.900) - - WA
ed Other Non-Oper Expense 53,000 17.481 30.14% 40.519 34,078 (16.597) 38.70%
Matls,Supp,&So, 34,687,700 14.677.482 42.31% 20.010218 14,400,003 268,479 1.86%
Total Expenditures 77.827.300 36.280.364 46.62% 41.546.916 34,661,431 1.618.953 4.67%
Less:Cost Allocation (20,942,200) (9,773.4661 46.67% (11,168,734) (9,464.700) (308.686) -3.26%
Net J.O.Requirements 56,885,100 28,506,918 46.60% 30,378,182 25.190.651 1.310.267 5.20%
Less: Revenues (4,730.000) (1,5992871 33.81% (3.130,713) (1,524.578) (74.709) 4.90%
Net J.O.Expenses $ 52,155.100 $ 24,907,631 47.76% $ 27,247.469 S 23,672.073 $ 1,235.556 5.22%
Section 2-Page 7
W
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
W
Increase Increase
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease)
12/31/01 IV31100 $ % w
Treatment Process:
Preliminary Treatment $ 2.686,827 $ 3,103,803 $ (416,976) -13.43%
r
Primary Treatment 1.951,347 2,483,764 (532,417) -21.44%
Secondary Treatment 1,542,163 1,875,107 (332,944) -17.76% u
Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 278,755 290.340 (11,685) -3.99%
Effluent Disposal 213,909 272,000 (58.091) -21.36% r
Solids Handling 10,031,912 10,691,525 (659.613) -6.17%
Cogeneration 4,044.609 2.222,534 1.822,075 81.98%
utilities 543,426 534,216 9,210 1.72% W
Electrical Distribution 343,644 282.446 61,198 21.67%
W
Miscellaneous Buildings 2.016,923 2.171.369 (154,436) -7.11%
Air Quality 610.615 185,894 424,721 228.47% W
Laboratory 2242,788 1,083.663 1.159,125 106.96%
Net Joint Operating Requirements 26,506,918 25.196,651 1.310,287 520% W
Less: Revenues (1,599,287) (1,524,578) (74,709) -4.90%
Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 24.907,631 $ 23,672,073 $ 1,235,558 522%
r
W
W
W
W
Section 2-Page 8 W
Joint Operating Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
December 31, 2001
600-
s74
rr 560
549
28
519
46 ' 510
450 --- --- -
6/30198 6/30/99 &30/00 613001 12/31,01
■Actual ■Vamnt
At December 31, 2001, the total head count was 518 employees, or a lull time equivalency of 508.75.
Section 2- Page 9
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report L
L
L
is
L
L
L
L.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank L
L
1.
Ir
L
L
1.
L
L'
L
Section 2-Page 10
CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program - FV 2001-02
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2001
5]2B 9]a��dd9
PrmdrySry SSOB1<S5
� 5]09<65 Leafinen� 3%d 3di05 Ma�biryd
IMaQxpk6 TA p9dtiM lYk
3%
6d'+Snc^+ Wcn
� FByllg6 $yAem..J%
U%
P I.YN 569J]I]
PNS YN, II4My$yAMnS A
T PrgectS31
N Cmud
51'.9J.3]0 PWIeC PrOp6151%
Ecwpner,Ba -
S2.O1�62]
uo-- d
Cangnewpn B%
. SL3td,059
PrmssR
- 52011.3M $penal Prgetl,
d4emllaneaued 5%
$W0.^ Rg6n6
1.
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure - $25,968,895
sn<eo dda
— aegademenu
flNupWatwn
tt%
56.695.6J0
$J.565. A
Support
Treat Tealmenl
10'6 36':
$3127,379
Aftl.o al
Capacity
12".
_. Total Capital Improvement Expenditure - S25,968,895
Section 3 - Page 1
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year I
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001 L
Revised
2001-02 200142 2001-02 2001-02 L
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay 12/3V01 Outlay Outlay
Collection System Into roveme.t Protects
Collections y
Santa Me Trunk Sewer Rehab. $ 441,000 $ 67.451 $ 373,549 $ 25B.OW
Carbon Carryon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sever 51,000 2,892 48,108 3,000
Carbon Cnyn Sever and Pump Sin.Abandonment 322,OOD 15.531 306.469 69.500 LSanta Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer 1,000,000 30.775 969,225 75,000
Sane Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Proles 518,000 (1,571.087) 2.089.067 1,200,000
Abandonment of the Existing SARI in SA River - - - -
Taft Branch Improvements - - - - V
Atwood Sublrunk Improvements 334,000 16,555 317,444 38,000
Replacement Of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 158,000 153,321 4,679 320.000
Orange-Western Sublmnk Relief Sever, 1.200,000 39.903 1.160.097 1,370,000
Rehabilitation of Me Magnolia Trunk Sewer 1.179,000 (1,729) 1,180.729 Lrl
Rehabilitation of Me Westside Pump Station 129.000 8.633 120,367 106,000
Lining of 24-NPTB FM(June Box W 2nd Angle PI.) 909,000 - 909,000 I
Relocation of LMo Pump Station 139,000 29.192 109,a08 $7,000 Ir
Big Canyon OBsite Sewer Rehabilitation 541,000 1.437 539.563 13,000
Replacement of Back Bay Think Sewer 2,461,000 2,608,322 (147,322) 6,362,000
Replacement of the Biter Point Pump Station 284,000 29.211 254789 114.000
Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 518,000 17.188 500,812 56,000 Inl
Rehabilitation of the 14th Street Pump Station 156OOo 454,880 (296,880) 557,000
Rehabilitation of the•A'Street Pump Station 128,000 126.251 1,749 240,ON
Rehabilitation of Me Bay Bridge Pump Station 131.000 3.514 127.486 86,000 L!Rehabilitation of me Crystal Cove Pump Station 71,000 5,492 65.508 71,000
Abandonment of AS Trunk,Watson and Cal.Sewers 306,000 38,017 269,983 160,300
Newland Street lntemptor Sewer Protection 6e000 5,220 63.760 "NO
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 2,653.000 109.659 2.543.341 733,000 L
Laerel and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy. 14,000 - 14,000 -
Rehabililation of the Edinger Pump Station 152,000 2.483 149,517 90,000
Facilities Engineering Pmlects-Collections 300.000 - 300.000 300,000
Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 613=1 (52,035) 52,035 215,100 y
Subtotal-Collections 14,166,000 2,139,097 12,026,903 12,529,900
Revenue Area 7 V
Covey Lars Pump Station Abandonment 120,000 11159 124,841 5,000
SunOwver lnleroeplw Manhole Rehab. 401.000 50.839 350,161 235,000
College Ave Pump Station Parallel Force Main 393,000 3,874 389,126 27,100
Gisler-Redhlll Tmnk Improvements.Reach'A• 256,000 107,437 150,563 249.000
Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach"B• 64.000 9,316 64,684 242,000
Tustin Trunk Improvements 53,ODD 180 52,820 200
Orange Trunk Improvements 234,000 58,044 175,956 224,000
West Tmnk improvements 13,000 SO 12.940 100 V
Gisler-RadhilONere Trunk lmpmvemenls M9,000 68.118 300.892 313.000
Relocation of the Michelson Pump Station 217,000 - 217,000
Modmanians to the Main Street Pump Station 445.000 - 445,000 - L
Additional Charges to CIP Closed at W30101 1,041 (1.0411 4,000
Subtotal-Revenue Areal 2,573,000 3W,068 2,272,932 1,299,400
Revenue Area 14 L
Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6130101 8,669 (8,869) 9,000
Total Collection System Improvement Projects 16,739,000 2,448,034 14,290,955 13,838,300
Section 3-Page 2
CIP Review
«<+ Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2001
Revised
2001-02 200142 2001-02 200142
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay 12/31/01 Outlay Outlay
® Treatment 8 Disposal Prolecia
Collectons FacI118es
PumpsmBon SCADA Communlations Study 80,000 - 80,000 80,000
Trunk Sesser Mapping Plead 655,000 382,471 272.529 630,000
Rehab 8 Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station 80,000 329 79,671 we
BushaN Trunk Serer Rehabilitation 2,358,000 657.282 1,700.718 1,310,000
Subtotal•collections Facilities 3,173,000 1,WO,082 2,132.918 2,020,500
® Headworks
Gdl Auger Replacement 55,000 44.069 11.931 59,000
PLC Programming and Integration 391.000 1.753 389,247 60,000
e SunOower Drive Replacement 394,000 117,057 276,943 405,600
Headvarks RehablibatimuRefurbishment 47.000 3,837 43.163 6,000
Headrode Improvements at Plant No.2 5,146,000 426.680 4,719,320 2,343,000
Plant No.2 Haadvorks Pilot Testing Program 512.000 196.069 315,931 617.000
Subtotal•Headworka 6.546.000 789,465 5.756.535 3,490,600
Primary Treatment
FadOes Modification fro Odor Control 306,000 488.378 (182,378) 895p00
Pd.Clarifiers 16.318 Berated Facilities 3.265.000 252,218 3,012.782 3.000.000
Waste Siddatream Pump Station Upgrade 265,000 - 265.000
Primary Treatment Rehitaftfurb 138,000 227 137,773 300
ancular Clarigar Drive Replacement/Upgrade 1,147,000 (13,180) 1,160,180 79,800
Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 403.000 1,291 401,709 42.000
Sludge Level Measurement Device installation 205,000 205,DDO 60,00D
Subtotal-Primary Treatment 5.729,000 728,934 5,000,066 4,077,100
m Secondary Treatment
Sec Treat Monitoring 8 Odin Sys.Upgrade 96,000 5,661 90,339 8.100
m Rehab TftUng Fl6em 8 Construct Now Clarifiers 1,000,000 626,380 373.620 1.200.000
Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 100,000 11,099 88.901 40.000
Secondary Plant Rehabil6allon 18.000 3.110 14,89D 15,ow
Oxygen Plant Reduadement/Rehabilitation Assess 90,000 - 90,000 40,000
m Activated Sludge Addition Basin Selector Study 560,000 2,774 557,276 163,000
AS Clarifier Equipment Replacement 460,000 1,475 448,526 405.000
Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System 85.000 a5.000 10000
Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2.399.00D 650,449 1,748.01 1.881,100
Solids Handling 8 Digestion
Devratedng Belt Press Rebuild 103.000 73.634 29,166 133.800
New Bell Fi trete ClaMer 47,000 - 47.000 30,000
RehabBimtion of Digesters at Plant No.2 3,762,000 1,398,014 2,365,986 2.500.000
Solids Smmge and Tmdc Leading Facility 8.251.000 1.407,358 6,843,642 3,200,000
Digested 8 caressing Reme/Refurbishmmd 144.000 144,000 30,000
r Dowatedn9 Belt Press Erdenslon 222,000 - 222,000 -
High Ram Digester Mix Pumps Mech.Seals 197,000 74.328 122.672 164.300
Devatedng Belt Press Rebuild 218,ODO 67.231 18g769 180.000
Sludge Greater Replacement 193,000 7.418 185,582 28,000
Tula Ranch Acquisftion/9iosolids Managemanl Needs Em,000 65,272 6,284.728 100,000
Compost FadlBy 19,663,000 - 19,863,000 6.000.000
DesigWInsmll Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 732,000 732.000
m Subtotal-Sollde Handling B Digestion 39.aw,0o0 3,081.465 36,800,546 12AS6,100
�, Section 3-Page 3
W
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Revised
2001-02 2MI-02 2001-02 2001-02
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay 1201101 Outlay Outlay
Ocean Oulfall Systems W
Investigation and Repair of Ocean credit 210,000 207,438 2,562 254,000
Oudall flow Meter Replacement 947,000 458.455 488,545 840,000
Peak Flow Management 516,000 34,668 481,332 2651000
Effluent Pumping SMI Annex 1,077,000 454.195 62ZWS 1,077p00
He Shoreline Contamincation Investigation Plow III 4,T72.900 2,139,191 2,133.709 4,31)0.000
NPDES Permit Renewed 337,000 64,629 272,371 337.000
Subtotal-Ocean Outwit Systems 7.359.900 3.358.576 4.001.324 7,073,000
W
utility systems
Electrical Pacer System Studies 328,000 122,475 itil 5 325.100
Standby Ponwrand RetubilityMWificatmns 1.067.000 370,9112 696.098 BOU,000 r
Cable Troy Improvements at Plants 1 8 2 908.000 31.187 876.813 55.000
Central Generation AUWmation 441,000 27.154 413,846 410.000
Gas Compesser Addition at Plant No.2 197,000 4,423 111 30,000
UdHw Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 240,000 137,576 102,424 249,000 •d
Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120,000 - 120,000 -
Eleddcal Equipment Refurbishment and Pmleclian 69,000 - 89,000 -
Phone System Upgrade Plants 1 8 2 199,000 199,000
Subtotal-Utility Systems 3,589,000 693.717 2,895,283 1,869.100 W
Odor Control Related Projects
Fad2ties Modifications for Odor Control 0,000 141.418 (79,418) 367,500 W
Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 469,000 228275 240,725 466.000
Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 73.000 54,383 18.617 255,W0
Streeter Monitor and Control Project 794,000 324,408 469.592 720,000
Rehabiffstion of Odor Control FaGlNes 370.000 - 370,000 2W,000 r
Chemicsl Facility Mods.at Plant No. t 330.000 276217 53.783 W1,000
Subtotal•Odor control Related Projects 2,096,000 1,024,701 1.073299 2,159.500
Plant AWem ltwn 8 computerization r
Power Monitoring and Control Systems - - -
Plant RelnventionlAutomadonProject 1,9W.Wo 974.727 978273 1.876,000
Documsnt Management 146P00 49,358 MA42 70AW w
Recalls Management Pregram 229,000 4,474 224.526 150,=
Data Integration 354.000 264.954 89.046 4S%W0
Show#Information Amhereune(SIA) 70,000 74AN (4.605) 14a,W0
CMMS Programming 99,000 11,119 87.881 46.000 - -^
Meaux Application Development 117,000 220 1/s,780 66,000
VolcaDea Building Reweng 82,000 53.527 28.473 55,000
Internet Etmall Browsing(Weintw) 32,000 7.157 24,843 28,000 r
Source Control Programming 231,000 94,496 136,504 231.000
Oeo,rsphic Information System 45.000 8.851 36,149 45.000 _
Fad Fear Optic Upgrades 402,000 174,367 227,643 300.000
SCADA Communications-Eeemet Study 147,000 147,000 SA00 IJ
Replacement of leteryHnl FSer OPScs 463.000 20.997 442,003 150.000
Windows 2000 Migration 295,000 74.764 220236 290.000
SCADA Graphics Tagging Update W7,000 913 NS'DZ7 36,000
Financial Information System Upgrade 235.000 105.602 130,398 485.000
IdmmaWn Toohirology Disaster Recovery 134.000 22,513 111,487 im.000
Network Equipment Upgrade 1,152000 71,933 1,080,067 1.100.000
Subtotal-Plant A rtomauon B Computerlra0on 6_7 ,ODD 2,014,627 4,7 9,373 5,676,000 W
Section 3-Page 4
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Rovlsed
2001-02 2001-02 2001-02 2001-02
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay 12/31101 Oullay Outlay
Process Related Special Projects
m Effluent Pathogen Reduction Allematives Pion 250.OW 3,351 246,649 65.000
Standard Specifications Revision and Updates 20.000 2.445 17.555 1,50D
Thermal Insulation Management Program 353.000 - 353,000 353,0to
Plant 08 M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 690.000 3.431 686,569 37,40D
Hioa dous Energy Control Procedures 380.000 19.962 360.018 W.000
Mast Management Program 280,000 25.9% 254.0% 170,000
Special Projects 2,352,000 1,159,146 1,192,854 2.952.000
SuttOtal-Process Radiated Spockl Projects 4,325,000 1214,259 3,110,741 3.610,900
Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects
Continuous Food Chemical TreaEnenl Facility 461,000 451,000 451,000
Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 87ADD 87,000 67,000
Facilities Enghreedng Projects-Joint 9110.000 436.096 483,go4 750,000
Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 900.000 188.039 711,961 375.000
Facilities Engineering Pmjscis-Plant 2 900,000 437228 462.772 aul
Interim Fee Recent 8 Eng Data Syst Ment Services 202,000 148.081 0,919 300,000
Area Classification Studies 1.9001 411.811 1,548,175 1,0D0,000
Stalegic Plan-Parties 2 62.000 29.526 32.474 66.300
Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan El 146.000 20.883 125.117 140,900
Lang Range thea lids Management Plan 272,000 2.433 269,567 65,000
WAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No. 1 and 2 1,123,000 649,084 473.916 834,000
Landscape and litigation at Plant No.2 86,000 79.634 6.366 104.000
r Secant,System Improvements 620.00D 42.665 577,335 180,000
Small Cap.Equip,Replacement Pmjw 750.00D 151.543 595,457 500.000
Warehouse Relmendot Project 295.000 12,326 283.674 150.DDO
r Process Safety Management Compliance Program 60,000 - 60,000 60,000
Puma Modeling 121.000 - 121.000 121.000
08 M USrary Fboring B Shelving 64.000 - 64,000 65.000
SoaleOlc Plan Update 440,000 1,965 438,035 440.000
Sulatofal-Miscellaneous A Support Projects 9,440.00D 2,611,328 6,W5,672 6,529,200
Water Management Projects
rr Gmurd ater Replenishment System 26.195.000 2.682.666 23.512.334 9200.000
Water Coman,a0on 560,OW 367.920 192,050 520.20D
Co-op Projects,IngvvAn61L Reduction 4213.000 405.114 3.81 2.675,000
Long Tern Permanent Mcmicuing Program 3,375.ODO 552,642 2,822,358 3,152,000
SuEtotal-Water Management Projects N,343,01t0 4.0111 2 3D334,658 15,547200
Additional Charges to CIP Completed at 6730101 711.$Q (711,548) 1,642,700
m Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 125,677,900 21,927,483 103,7WA17 67,973,000
Capital Equipment purchases 4,169,00D 1,50,378 2,575,622 4.169,000
Total Collections and Treatmont 8 Disposal
Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases S146,585.900 $25,g68,895 $120.617,OD5 $85.980.300
Section 3-Page 5
W
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Project Life 6w
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Current Total
Approved June 30.2001 Year Projected Remaining W
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Fulurs
Budget Cost Cost June 30,2002 Budget
Collection System Improvement Prolects W
Colleetfons
Santa Ana Trunk Sever Rehab. S 7.494,000 S 154,149 $ 25%0N It 412.149 $ 7.081,551
CeNon Canyon Dam Intercepter Paa14l Sewer 5.010100 , 161,262 3,000 164252 4,545.746
Carbon Cnyn Sever and Pump SM.Atandonment 3.564,000 IM.355 69.5110 192.856 3A71,1N
Santa Me River lnWroeptor Relief Sewer 11,056.000 237,445 75,000 312.445 10,743AM
Santa Ma River Interceptor Realignment and Ploac 84,935.000 3.492.214 1.200,000 4,692214 W242,786
Abandonment of Me Existing SARI In SA River S."I.000 - S.4M.000 W
Taft Branch lmpmvemena 4,500.000 9,386 - 9.386 4.490,1114
Atv,00d Subbunk Improvements 1.708,000 92,201 36.000 130.201 I.M.T99
Replacement of Miller-Holdar Trunk Sewer Siphon 1,616,000 960,434 320.000 1.280.434 335.585
Orange-Wastem Subtrunk Relef Sewer 1,330.000 138,534 1.370,000 1,508,S34 (i75.534) W
Rehabiliaton of Me Magnolia Trunk Sewer 25.645,000 - - 26.645.000
Ralab0ila4on of Ore Weatslds Pump Station 1,619,000 78.496 106.000 184,496 1.434,504
lining of 24'NPTB FM(Juno Sox to 2nd Angie PL) 909.om - - - 909.000
Relocation of Lido Pump Station 3.686.000 116,883 87.000 203,883 3,492.117
Big Carryon OBshe Sewer Rehebllitatbn 2.714,DD0 17.434 13.000 30,434 2A835%
Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sever 5'lideo0 473.082 6.362,000 6.535,082 12M.918
Replacement of the Bihar Point Pump Staten 3,580,000 129.962 114,000 243.962 3,316,038 W
Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 4,399,000 85.029 56.000 141.029 4257,971
Rehabilitation of the 14M Street Pump Station 2211.000 122237 557,000 679,237 1,01,763
Rehabilitation of Ma'A'Steel Pump Station 2,848,000 682,352 240.000 922.352 1,925,648
Relabirdation of Me Bay Bridge Pump Station 1,194,000 41.112 86.000 127.112 1.056.888 W
Rehat ifotion of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 526.000 47,254 71,000 118254 407,746
Abandonment of AS Trunk.Watson and Cal.Sewers 2.634.000 182.740 160.300 343,040 2290,960
Newland Street lnarsptar Sever Protection 10.000 - 6.000 6.000 138.000
Warner Avenue Relief Sower 4.898,000 335.734 733,000 1.068.734 3.829266
Lateral and Sever Abandonment at PaeMc Coast Hwy. 14,000 - - 14,000
Rehabirdation of the Edinger Pump Station 1.403.000 49.951 90.000 139.g51 1,343,049
Fadrdiea Engineering PmjecbsColleullom 5.400.000 - 300.000 300.000 S,to0Ao0
Adeftsonal Charges to CUP Closed at WWI 7.620.004 215,100 7.835.104 A.S35.1041
Subtoal-Collections 202.636,000 15,351,241 12,529.900 27,881,141 174,754,850
Revenue Area 7
Covey Lard Pump Stal Abandonment 141.ODO - 5.000 5,000 136,000
Sunliover lntemptor Mantels Rehab. 5.387,000 200,985 235,000 435,985 4,951.015
College Ave Pump Station Parallel Fome Main 1.1186,000 83,119 27.100 110,219 1,T75,7111
Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach'A' 4.M5,000 154,439 249.000 403.439 3,621,561 W
Gisler-RedhiH System Improvements,Ratio ' 5.013.000 9.953 242,000 251.953 4,761A47
Tustin Trunk Improvements 3,656,000 8.450 200 8,650 3.647,360
Orange Trunk Improvements 3.942,000 143,106 224.000 367.106 3.574,091 W
West Trunk Improvements 496.000 1.989 10D 2,089 493MI
Gsler-Red19yMorth TWO Improvements 5,7N,000 206,055 313.000 519,D55 5,18CO45
Ralora0on of Me Michelson Pump SWUM 1,045,000 379 - 379 1,044A21
Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station 445.000 - - - 445,000 W
Additional Changes to CUP Closed at WWI 160,268 4,000 164265 (1642881
Subtotal-Revenue Neal 31,740,000 958743 1,299,40D 2268,143 29.471.857
6d
Revenue Area 14
Additional Charges to CUP Closed at Went - 301,915 9,000 310,915 (310,9151
Total Cofie ton System Improvement Project 234,376,000 16,621AMil 13,838,300 30,460,199 203.916.501 W
Section 3-Page 6 L.
CIP Review
® Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Current Total
`a Approved June 30,2001 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Projected Costal Future
Budget Cost Cost June 30.2002 Budget
m Treatment&Olsnml Prolacb
Collections Facilities
Pumpsta0on SCADA Communlations Study 80,0W - Bg000 80,000 -
Tmnk Sewer Mapping Project 1.709,000 627 630,000 630,627 1.078,373
® Rehab&Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station 1,606,000 1,728 500 2,228 1,603,772
Bushard Trunk Sawar Rehabilitation 33.705,000 805,452 1,310,000 2,115,452 31,594548
Subtotal-Collections Facilities 37,101,000 807,807 2.020,500 2,828,307 34,272.693
Headworks
Grit Auger Replacement 1.131,000 1.018,925 seem 1,077,925 53.075
PLC Programming and Integration 395.000 686 60,000 Seals 334,314
s Sunflower Drive Replacement 615,000 181,197 405,600 586,797 28203
Headworks RetlabllltetionfRerurNshment 11,346,000 32.257 6.000 38.257 11.307,743
Headworha Improvements at Plant No.2 160,130,000 862,856 2,343,000 3.205,856 156,924,144
Plant Na.2 Headwork;Pilot Testing Program 623,000 3,857 617,000 620,857 2,143
m Subtotal•Headwall 174.240.000 2,099,778 3,490,600 6,590,378 168,649,622
Primary Treatment
Facilities ModKcations for Odor Control 791,000 285,129 assorso 1,180,129 (389.129)
Pd.Clarifiers 1631&Related Facilities 75.450.000 4,668,957 3,000,000 7,568,957 67,881.043
Waste SteaOaem Pump Station Unnele 1.069.0DO - - - 1,069,000
Primary Tumenent Rehate Refurb 11,90t,000 227 no 527 11,903.473
Circular Carries,Drive ReplacemenWpgrade 5,840,000 - 79,800 79,800 5,760.200
Sludge Density Meter Upgrstle$ 8DO,D00 - 42,000 42,000 758,000
Sludge Leval Measurement Device Installation 364,000 60,000 611,001) 304,000
Subtotal-Printery Treatment 96,218,000 4.854.313 4,077,100 8,931,413 87,286,587
r Secondary Treatment
Sec.Treat.Monitoring&Cnid Sys,Upgrade 3.307.000 519.108 8,100 527,208 2,779,792
Rehab Trickling Filters B Construct Now Clarifiers 44,750,000 681,074 I'M,= 1,581,074 42,868.926
Activated Sludge Plant Rehabllgation 15.10.000 40,000 40,ODO 15,110,000
Secondary Plant Rehab06ation 7.443,000 - 15,000 15,000 7,428,000
Oxygen Plant Repbooment/Rehabilllallon Assess 110.000 - 40,000 40,000 70.000
r Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 950,000 - 163,0100 103,000 787,000
AS Clarifier Equipment Replacement 480,000 - 405.000 405,000 75.000
Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System 120.000 10.000 10,000 110,000
Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 72,310,000 1,200,182 1,881,100 3,081282 69,228,718
e Sonde Handling&Digestion
Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild 528.000 433.838 133.800 567,638 (39.638)
New sell Fgirato Clarifier 1.320.000 - 30,OOD 30,000 1,290,000
m Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 15,154,000 11.1171"1 2,500,0011 13.617.441 1,536.559
Wide Storage and Truck Loading Facility 14,950,000 5.676.060 3,200,000 8.876.060 6,073.940
Digestion&Dowate ing Rehab.mefurbishment 10A9D,000 - 30.000 30,000 10.400.000
e Oewaiedng Bell Press Edension 23D,000 7.469 - 7,469 222,531
High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mech.Seals 517,000 359.799 164,300 524,D99 (7.09g)
Devr4toring Ben Press Rebuild 824,000 335,337 180,000 515,337 308,663
Sludge Grinder Replacement 224,00D 191.679 28,000 219.579 4.421
Tula Ranch Acquisl6oNBlosolids Management Needs 9.900.000 66.017 100.000 166,017 9,733,983
Compost Facility 34.T70,000 - 6,000.000 6,000,000 28,T70,000
Desl9Nlmtali Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 2,600,000 2.600.000
Subtotal-So11Cs Handling&Digestion 91.51Y7.1)00 18.187.540 12.366.100 30,553,640 60.953.360
.. Section 3-Page 7
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life W
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Current Total W
Approved June 30,2001 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Cost Cost June 30,2002 Budget
Oman Ounall Systems W
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outten 16,907,000 1.240,458 254,000 1.494,455 15,412,542
Outfall Flow Meter Replacement 1,499,0W 332,323 8401000 1.172,323 328,677
Peak Fkrw Management 12.381,100 319,743 265,000 584,743 11,7%,257
Effluent Pumping Station Annex 47,925,000 579,980 1,OT7.0% 1,656,980 46268.020 W
Me Shoreline Contsminallon investigation Phase 111 5,196,600 923,677 4,300.000 5223.6n (27,077)
WOES Permit Renewal 337,000 337.000 337.00
Subtotal-Oman Outtsll System 84.245,600 3,396.181 7,073,000 10,469,181 73.776.419 u
Utility Systems
Electrical Power System Studies 3216.000 2.153.276 325,100 2.476,376 737,624
Standby Pourer and Refabildy Modifications 19.856.000 7.066243 600,000 7.866,243 11,989,767 1r
Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 18 2 26.778,001) 1,035,444 55,000 1,00.444 25.687,556
Combat Generation Automation 2,964,M 31,278 410.000 441278 2.522,722
Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 2,592,000 54.338 30,000 84.336 2,507,662
USlitie6 Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 3.794,0% 315,801 249,000 564,801 3,229.199 v
Underground Storage Tank Leak Detemom Upgrade 120,000 - - - 120.000
Electrical Equipment Refurbishment and Protection 1,567.000 - - - 1,567,000
Ph..System Upgrade Plants 1 8 2 199,ow - 199,000 W
Subtotal-Utility systems 61,086,000 10.650,380 1.8139.100 12,525,460 48,560,520
War Central Related Projects
Facilities Modifications he Odor Control 300,000 229,458 367.500 593.958 (296.958) W
Facilities Modification for Odor General 2,732.000 297,901 466,000 763,901 1,g68,099
Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 1,112,00(l 1,031,804 255,000 1,286,804 (174,130,1)
Bombed,Monitor and Control Pm)ect 2,382,001) 226.971 720,000 946,971 1.435,029
Rehabilitation of Odor Control Facilities 29,870,000 - 20,006 20.000 2jiNi100 W
Chemical Fadlily Mods.at Plant No.1 4.536.000 4,068,375 331,000 4.389.375 146,625
Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 40.932.000 5.844.509 2.159.500 8,004.009 32,W991
W
Plant Automation 8 Computsriratian
Pavrer Monitoring and Control Systems 3,728.000 24,177 - 24,177 3,703,923
Plant ReinventordAmernatien Project 25,760.000 9,186,291 1,878,000 11,052291 14.697.709
Document Management 864.000 541,568 70,00) 611,S6a 252,432 r+
Records Management Program 446,000 2%,560 150,000 356,560 $9.440
Data Integration 4,334,000 2,220.640 469,000 2,689,640 1.64g360
Strategic Information ArettitecWm(SIA) 724,01W 301.955 144000 441.965 282,045
CMMS Programming 490.000 290,157 46,00D 336.157 153,843 W
Intent Application Development 300,W) 95,584 66.000 151,584 148,416
VeiceAats Building Reldring 138,%0 660.209 55.000 715,204 (57r204)
Internet Emall B.Ing(Website) 300,000 183,117 28,00 211.117 88.883 L,d
Soured Control Programming 1.10I.0% 426,493 231,000 657,493 416,507
Geographic Information System 4.157.000 316,272 46,000 361272 3,795,728
Field Hirer Optic Upgrades 403.000 262,480 300.00D 562AN (159.480)
SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 158,000 310 5.000 5,310 152.60 W
Replacement of Interplant Fiber Optics 497,01M 33,032 150,000 183,032 313.968
Windows 2000 Migration 333.000 44,930 290.00D 334,930 (1,930)
SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 670,0% 41,954 38.000 77,984 592,016 W
Financial Information System Upgrade 1,825,000 216.987 485.000 771,987 1.053.013
Information Technology Diaster Recovery 139,00 5,553 134.000 139,553 (653)
Nehvark Equipment Upgade 2,443.0% 1.100,000 1,100,000 1.343.000
Subtotal-Plant Automation B Computerization 48,813,000 15,118,294 5,676,000 20.794.294 28,0157% W
Section 3-Page 8 -1
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements- Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Current Total
Approved June 30,2001 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Cost Cost June 30.2002 Budget
Process Related Spedal Project
Effluent Pathogen ReduNan Alternatives Plan 250.000 - 66,oW 66,000 184.000
Standard Spe,ficallons Revisions and Updates 200.000 455.362 2,500 457,W2 (257.802)
Tasrmal lnaulauoa 14ena9emenl Program 800,000 751 353.000 353.751 446,249
r Plant O 6 M Manual aral SOP Project-Phase 1 4.000.000 1,fiW 37.4W 39.000 3.981.000
Hazardous Energy Control Preacums 1,190.000 242.093 60,000 302,083 1187,917
Asset Management Program 870.000 170.000 170.000 700.00D
Specal Projects 9.852.000 1.228.949 2.952,000 4.180.948 5,671,052
Subtotal•Proceu Related Special Projects 17.162.000 1.928,744 3,640.900 5,569,644 11,592,356
MbcelWnsau 8 Support Projects
m Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 451.000 451,OW 451.000 -
phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 81.000 87.000 87.000 -
FacJluesEnginomingPmJects-Joint 18200.000 899.488 7W,W0 1,649.488 16.550,512
Fa0litea Enginaertag Projects-Plant 16200.0110 481.753 375.000 856.753 17.343247
Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 18200.000 1.038,752 65%000 1,886.762 16.313.248
Interim Fac Record 8 Erg Dale Syst Maint Services 370.000 2.827 300,000 302.827 67.173
Ama Classification Studies 29,345.0110 2.873.622 1,oW.000 3,873,622 25,471.378
_ Strategic Plan-phase 2 2.088,000 2,093.127 W.Wo 2,149,427 (61,427)
Supplement No.1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR 148,000 1.129 140MO 142,029 5,971
Long Range Bbsoeds Management Plan 332,000 65,000 65.000 267.001)
HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.1 and 1208.0W &.541 834.000 898.841 307,159
Leval and ligation at Plant No,2 $10.00D 80.543 104.000 164.843 645.157
Sewdty System improvements 1,334,000 614.967 180,000 794.957 539.033
Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 2,750,000 508265 SOo.000 1.008265 1.741,735
Wamhouae Rooment.h Project BOO,ODD 1268 150,000 151AS 448.732
Process Safety Management Compliance Program 60,00D - 60.000 110,000 -
Plume Modeling 121.000 - 121.MD 121.000 -
0 8 M Library Hearing 6 Shelving 144.000 - 65,000 65,000 79,000
_ Strategic Plan Updats OOO.ow 440,000 440,000
Subtotal-Miscellaneous B Support Projects 94.886.000 6.638,682 6,529,200 15,168,082 79,717,918
Water Management Project
Gmurdiwater Replenishment System 182,7W.OW 4.090.087 9200.000 13290.W7 169,409.913
Water marvaeon 4,644.000 1.528,886 520200 2,049.086 2.594.914
Coop Pmjects,InbwAnfill-Reduction 142,676,000 2.326,985 2,675.000 5,003,985 137.672.015
Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program 7,074,000 255.7015 3,152.000 3.407,705 3.66%284
m Subtotal-Water Management Projects 337.094.OW 8203,654 15,547,200 23,750,864 313,343,136
Additional Charges to CIP Completed at W0101 57240236 1,642.700 W.882.936 (58,882,936)
r Total Treatment and Disposal Project 1.155,694.600 138,176,510 67.973.OW 206,149,510 949,445.090
Capital Equipment Purchases 4,169,OW 4,169,000 4,169,000
m Total COIIOctlom,and Treatment 6 Disposal
Project and Capital Equipment Purchases $1.394,139.600 S154,798409 $W.9W.300 $240.778.709 $1.153.360,891
d Section 3-Page 9
W
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report
W
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
w
W
w
W
W
w
Section 3-Page 10 �,
Budget Review by Revenue Area
All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Operating Budget Review
r 2001412 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
CASH RECEIPTS:
Tax Allocations/Subvention5(Sham of l%) $ 38,153,000 $17,085,311 $ 21,067,689 44.78%
Connection Fees 5,824,000 3,566,662 2,257,338 61.24%
Other User Fees 85,081,000 31,636,687 53,444,313 37.18%
Sale of Capacity Rights 6,195,000 225 6,194,775 0.00%
Debt Proceeds 280,000,000 - 280,000,000 0.00%
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 38,314,000 15.078.962 23,235,038 39.36%
Total Receipts $ 453.567.000 $67,367,847 $386.199.153 14.85%
CASH DISBURSEMENTS:
,m Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 127,174.000 $23,520,861 $103,653,139 18.50%
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 16.739.000 2.448,034 14,290,966 14.62%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 38,937.000 17,562,802 21,354,198 45.16%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 52,165,100 24.907,631 27,247.469 47.76%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 13.810.000 6,518,935 7.291,065 47.20%
Total Disbursements $ 248,815,100 It 74.978,263 $173.836.837 30.13%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101101 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131101
m CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction In Progress $ 50.726.387 $ 2.448.034 $ - $ 53,174,421
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 94,079,221 23.520,861 117,599,082
r
Subtotal 1",804.608 25,968.895 170,773,503
m PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 10,398,596 - 10,398,596
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 366,916,487 - - 366,916,487
Treatment Facilities 607.730,120 - 607,730,120
Disposal Facilities 90,161,861 - - 90.161,861
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 121,441,616 - 121.441,616
Subtotal 1,196,648,680 1,196,648,680
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1.341,453,288 $25.968.895 $ $1,367,422,183
Section 4-Page 1
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report
Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2001
rd
Operating Budget Review
200"2 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dale
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
CASH RECEIPTS:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 34.522,000 $ 15.619,225 $ 19.002,775 44.95%
Connection Fees 5,096.000 3.178,679 1,917.321 62.38%
Other User Fees 68.916.000 28.633,809 40,282,191 41.55%
Sale of Capacity Rights 5.402.000 - 5,402,000 -
Debt Proceeds 250,000,000 - 250,000,000 0.00%
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 34,460.000 13,3D5,103 21,154.897 38.61%
Total Receipts $ 398,396,000 $ 60,636,816 $337.759,184 15.22%
CASH DISBURSEMENTS:
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 110,896,000 $ 20,423,164 $ 90,472,83E 18.42% r
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 14,167,000 2.139,097 12,027,903 15.10%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 36,121.000 16,439,265 19,681,736 45.51%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45,479.800 21,711,982 23,767.818 47.74%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 10,882,000 4.940,354 5,921.646 45.48% `
Total Disbursements $ 217,525,B00 $ 65,653,862 $151,811.938 30.18%
W
Capital Facilities Budget Review
I-,
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101101 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131101
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 50,344,313 $ 2.139,097 $ - $ 52,463,410
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 81,578,231 20.423.164 102,101,395
h
Subtotal 132,022,544 22,562,261 - 154,5114E05
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): .
Land and Property Rights 7.565.914 - - 7.565,914
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 291.014.408 - - 291,014,408
Treatment Facilities 527.694,687 - - 527.694,687
Disposal Facilities 78,290.134 - - 78,290,134
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 105,868,833 105,868,633
Subtotal 1.010,433,776 - 1,010,433,776 W
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,142.456,320 $ 22,562,261 $ $1.165,018,581
W
W
Section 4-Page 2
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2001
Operating Budget Review
2001-02 Year-To Remaining Year•T943ate
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
CASH RECEIPTS:
Tax Allowbons/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,531.000 $ 1,556,086 $ 2,064,914 43.13%
Connection Fees 7281000 387.993 340,D77 53.29%
Other User Fees 8,365,000 3,002,208 5,362,792 35.89%
Sale of Capacity Rights 605.000 225 604,775 -
Debt Proceeds 30.000.000 30,000,000 0.00%
Interest B Miscellaneous Revenue 2,884.000 881,808 2,002,192 30.58%
Total Recelpts $ 46,213,000 $ 5,838,310 $ 40,374,690 12.631/6
CASH DISBURSEMENTS:
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 12.425.000 $ 2,401,480 $ 10.023,620 19.33%
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 2,572,000 300.068 2,271,932 11.67%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2,816,000 1,143,537 1,672,463 40.61%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,110,700 2,572,958 2,537,742 50.34%
Revenue Area Operating 9 Other Expenses 2,592,000 1,422.246 1,169,754 54.87%
Total Disbursements $ 25.515,700 $ 7.840.289 $ 17,675,411 30.73%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01101 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131I01
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 219.741 $ 300,068 $ - $ 519,W9
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 9.613.050 2,401,480 12.014,530
Subtotal 9,932.791 2.701,548 - 12,534,339
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 2,329,402 - - 2.329,402
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46,556,108 - - 46.556.108
Treatment Facilities 62,047.211 - - 62,047.211
Disposal Facilities 9,205,942 - - 9,205,942
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 12,092.070 12.092,070
Subtotal 132,230,733 - 132.230,733
Total Property,Plant It Equipment&CIP $142,063,524 $ 2,701,548 $ - $144.765,072
Section 4-Page 3
2001-02 Mid-Year Report
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review W
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
vu
Operating Budget Review
2001-02 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Dale Budget %of Budget
CASH RECEIPTS:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of i%) $ - $ - $ - N/A
Connection Fees - - - N/A
Other User Fees 7,800,000 670 7,799,330 0.01%
Sale of Capacity Rights 188,000 - 188,000 0.00%
Debt Proceeds - - - N/A ry
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 970,000 892.051 77,949 91.96%
Total Receipts $ 8,958.000 $ 892.721 $ 8,065,279 9.97% ,r
CASH DISBURSEMENTS:
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 3.853,000 $ 696.217 $ 3,156,783 18.07
Collection Activity Capital Improvements - 81869 (8,869) N/A
COP Retirement and Interest Expense - N/A
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,564.600 622,691 941,909 39.80%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 356,000 156,335 199,665 43.91%
Total Disbursements $ 5,773,600 $ 1.484,112 $ 4,289,488 25.71%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101/01 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/01
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction In Progress $ 162,333 $ 8,869 $ - $ 171202
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,786,940 696,217 - 3.483.157
Subtotal 2,949,273 705.086 - 3.654.359
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 503.280 - - 503,280 `+
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,346.971 - - 29.345,971
Treatment Facilities 17,988,222 - - 17.988,222
Disposal Facilities 2,665.785 - - 2,665,785 r,
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3,480,913 - 3.480.913
Subtotal 53,984,171 - - 53.984,171 W
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 56.933.444 $ 705.086 $ - $ 57.638.530
W
W
Section 4-Page 4
W
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
m Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
2001-02 Through Through 12/31/01 Through Increase
Budget 12131/01 12131/01 Budget 12131100 (Decrease)
r
Revenues:
In-Lieu Premiums $1,246,500 $ 623,250 50.00% $623,250 $ 623,250 $ -
vy
Interest B Miscellaneous 80,000 19,366 24.21% 60,634 50,317 (30,951)
Allocation from Other Funds 500,000 358,356 71.67% 141,644 57,064 301,292
Total Revenues 1,826,500 1,000,972 54.80% 825,528 730,631 270,341
Expenses:
BeneftudClaims 300,000 38,767 12.92% 261,233 16,172 22,595
Contractual Services 3,500 600 17.14% 2,900 600 -
Legal Services 500,000 418.220 $3.64% 81,780 152,974 265,246
r Professional Services 5,000 716 14.32% 4,284 4,144 (3,428)
Supplies&Other - - WA - - -
Service Department Allocation 1.000,000 779,430 77.94% 220,570 822.378 (42,948)
ee Subtotal 1,808,500 1,237,733 68.44% 570,767 996.268 241,465
Excess Loss Policy 112,000 55,958 49.96% 56,042 50.383 5,575
'y Total Expenses 1,920,500 1,293,691 67.36% 626,809 1,046,651 247,040
Excess Revenue(Expenses) (94,000) (292,719) 311.40% $198,719 (316,020) 23.301
m Beginning Reserves 1,156,900 1,154,388 1,809,121 (664,733)
Ending Reserves 1 062 900 $ 861.689 1 493101 $(631.4321
Section 5-Page 1
2001 -02 Mid-Year Report r
Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review W
For the Six Months Ended December 31,2001
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
2001-02 Through Through 12131101 Through Increase
Budget 12131101 12/31/01 Budget 12131100 (Decrease) r
Revenues:
In-Lieu Premiums $317.600 $ 158,80D 50.00% $158.800 $ 155.000 $ 3,800
Interest B Miscellaneous 35.000 8,30D 23.71% 26.700 24.783 (16,483)
Total Revenrwe 352,600 167,100 47.39% 185,500 179,783 (12,683) r
Expenses. .
W
BenefWMaims 250.000 187,892 75.16% 62,108 220.631 (32.739)
Contractual Services 25,000 12.500 50.00% 12,500 12.500 - r
Legal Services 30,000 15,454 51.51% 14,546 9.004 6.460
Prolesstonal Services 35,000 19,992 57.12% 16.008 6,189 13,803 r
Supplies 8 Other - NIA - -
Service Department Allocalbns 50,000 13.488 26.98% 36,512 40,188 26,700
subtotal 390,000 249.326 63.93% 140,674 288,512 (39,186)
Excess Loss Pocky 35,000 19.250 55.00% 16,750 16,069 3.181
Total Expenses 425,000 268,676 63.19% 156,424 304,581 (36,005)
r
Excess Revenue(Expenses) (72,400) (101,478) 140.16% $ 29.078 (124,798) 23,322
Beginning Reserves 89,100 109,742 302,064 (192,322)
r
Ending Reserves _Lj6. 000 _$ 8266 $177.266 _Lap
r
r
r
W
W
SectOn 5-Page 2
r
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
(714)962-2411
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
Street Address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
OCSDI2131/01
Disinfecting
Wastewater
to
February 27, 2002
Recommendation
♦ Seek Board approval tonight to move
forward with construction and operation
of disinfection facilities
♦ Goal: begin disinfection within 90 days,
subject to regulatory approval
♦ Return to the Board for final budget
approval after costs are better known
i
0
y Disinfect?
♦ Disinfection kills bacteria and viruses
♦ Meet beach water quality standards at our
outfall 4.2 miles offshore in 200 ft of water
♦ Remove all doubt that our discharge
is a source of bacteria on the beach
♦ If bacteria exceedances occur at the
beach this summer, it will not be OCSD
�nitoring Shows
♦ Routine ocean monitoring since 1972
♦ 1996 20 meter survey
♦ November 2000 special study
♦ September 2001 summer survey
♦ February 2002 core monitoring
2
7-tulle'•. �'• Bolsa Chlca y�
•., O State Beach �
e'••, p PLANT
-mil
NO. 1
p. .• .Huntington @ m�
Plume
bccaetonally! •� .��•••�-'••.
• •................
found
NOTTOscnLe Plume
fre4------ found
3
Project Schedule
♦ 90 day goal to modify and start up existing
temporary disinfection facility
♦ Initial chemical cost estimate = $10 million
♦ Other costs = $4 million
♦ Facilities, monitoring,O&M labor
♦ Temporary facility pending completion of
permanent solution
♦ Consult with regulatory agencies and
community members
We Will Do It Right
♦ Compliance with California Ocean Plan
residual chlorine limits
♦ Understand toxicity of disinfection
byproducts
♦ Monitor impacts on marine life
♦ Possible changes to ocean monitoring
program
4
-Long-Term Disinfection Options
N1017♦ Strategic Plan Update
♦ Chemical disinfection
♦ Ozone
♦ Ultraviolet light
♦ Microfiltration
♦ 3 to 5 year project schedule
®�Per Issues
♦ Secondary treatment
♦ Disinfection and secondary treatment are
separate issues
♦ Disinfection = public health /bacteria and viruses
♦ Secondary treatment =fish health/ BOD & SS
♦ Results of HB III studies
♦ Help to understand ocean transport mechanisms
♦ Improve design of ocean monitoring program
5
Motion
♦ Authorize the General Manager to
negotiate and procure services, materials,
goods and construction contracts required
to implement Short-Term Outfall Bacteria
Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, at an
undetermined cost to be subject to future
ratification by the Board of Directors.
Orange County Sanitation District
www.ocsd.com
6