Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-19 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 12, 2001 phone: 1714)952-2411 far. (714)962U355 NOTICE OF MEETING www.acad.eom msplOaBotda127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fo"MeinValley.27 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT stew[addnas: 6944 Ell la Avenue WEDNESDAY, December 19, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Member Ag e mb e r DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES M • 10844 Ellis Avenue cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 Anaheim Brea The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Buena Park ypnss District will be held at the above location, time and date. Fountain Valley Fullerton Cin B Huntington Beach / Irvine �Yj Le Habra Le Palms B rd Secret Los Alamitos _ Newport Beach Orange Pmemumin Banta Ane Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Tentatively - Scheduled Uocomine Meetinas Who Park ibr Linda County of Cranpe FAHR COMMITTEE . Wednesday,January 9,2002 at 5:00 p.m. sanitary Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT costa Mese SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monde Janus 14, 2002 at 5:30 m. OCWD Mom,-aY City Y•January P� @ Water Districts Irvine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,January 23,2002 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership in mestemater and meter resource management. �m BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 March March 27, 2002 April April 24, 2002 May May 22, 2002 June June 26, 2002 July *July 17, 2002 August August 28, 2002 September September 25, 2002 October October 23, 2002 November 'November 20, 2002 December *December 18, 2002 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month GiwpAdladmin\B.%Agentla12001 Mee0ng No0wWW 1.2Aoc DECEMBER 19, 2001 GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE December 10, 2001 • The JCC directed Staff to design certain facilities to accommodate solar panels in the future. Solar power is not cost effective to install at this time. • The JCC approved four change orders totaling $10,601.90 and accepted as complete the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline and Lacy Parking Facility construction contract. The contract included work for the Orange County Sheriffs Department. The final contract amount is $3,000,058.09. Original bid = $2,919,500; <3% change orders. GWR System work final cost = $1,431,840. OCSD share = $715,920. • The JCC authorized OCWD General Manager to purchase property for barrier wells at 8161 Ellis Avenue in an amount of $255,000 and directed Staff and tenant relocation consultant to begin tenant relocation process and to proceed with the demolition of the structure. OCSD/OCWD Boards delegated authority up to an aggregate amount of $1 ,000,000 to the OCWD General Manager in September 2001 for execution of rights-of-way, property acquisition, and tenant relocation. WS:jo G9wp.dma ngXPDCWdcOlSullebU217OI BwM Mtg Bullets-J36JCC repOn.E N V` DECEMBER 19, 2001 BOARD ITEM NO. 20.c: • On March 28, 2001 , the Board of Directors authorized Addendum No. 3 with Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. • Since March, there have been eleven changes in the scope to the final design. • In September, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee authorized Staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with CDM for these eleven changes. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District approval of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM in an amount not to exceed $369,000 for these changes to the final design. • OCSD's share is 50% of the total addendum or $184,500. • Addendum No. 4 would increase the CDM team's authorized budget from $34,964,107, to an amount not to exceed $35,333,107. (Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp, Dresser 8 McKee Inc. for an additional amount of$369,000, fora total amount not to exceed $35,333,107, for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design for the Groundwater Replenishment system, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$184,500) WS:jo:gc G:%wp.dW"XPDC%Pdc01MBNleta 121701 Beard Mta Buueh-J-ae 20e.m= t DECEMBER 19, 2001 BOARD ITEM NO. 20.d: • On March 28, 2001 the Board of Directors authorized a change to the task order with Separation Processes, Inc. for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for membrane systems for the Groundwater Replenishment System. • Since March, there have been three changes in the Separation Processes, Inc. scope for the final design. • In September, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee authorized Staff to negotiate Change Order No. 3 with SPI for these three changes. • The JCC recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 with Separation Processes, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $114,665 for these changes to the final design. • OCSD's 50% share of the addendum is $57,333. • Change Order No. 2 would increase the Separation Processes, Inc. authorized budget from $1 ,901,410 to an amount not to exceed $2,016,075. (Approve Change Order No. 3 to Separation Processes, Inc., Orange County Water District Task Order No. 201301, for an additional amount of$114,665, increasing the total amount not to exceed$2,016,075, for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design of membrane systems for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$57,333) WS:jo:gc Wead aWltwp.dtelengtPDC\Pdc01\Bullets%121701 Boald Mtg Bullets-J-36 20d.doc DECEMBER 19, 2001 BOARD ITEM NO. 20.e: • Value engineering studies are required for the Groundwater Replenishment System at approximately the 30% and 70% design stages to support the application for funding under the State Revolving Fund administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. • The 30% design value engineering study was completed by a team of professionals led by George M. Wesner and Howard Almgren in early June 2001 at a cost of about $60,000, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board. • The final design of various project components is approaching the 70% completion stage, and will soon be ready for the second value engineering session. • At the October 22, 2001 meeting, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee directed Staff to negotiate with the Wesner/Almgren team to complete the 70% design value engineering services. • The Wesner/Almgren team proposes to prepare three separate 70% design value engineering studies for a maximum not to exceed amount of $143,960. • These three value engineering studies will comply with the State Water Resources Control Board requirements for the State Revolving Fund loan, and conform to the project schedule. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District approval of an Orange County Water District Task Order to Howard Almgren in an amount not to exceed $143,960 for value engineering services. • Orange County Sanitation District's 50% share would be $71,980. (Approve an Orange County Water District Task Order in an amount not to exceed $143,960 to Howard Almgren for the Howard Almgren team to complete value engineering services at the 70% design level for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No.J-36, with Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$71,980 each) wS:jo G.\wp.dMkeng\PDCWdc0l%Bulletskl21701 Bmrd Mtg Bullets-J-36 20eAm DECEMBER 19, 2001 NOTE: THIS ITEM WILL BE MOVED TO THE FRONT OF THE BOARD AGENDA AND WES BANNISTER WILL PROVIDE A VERBAL REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS. BOARD ITEM NO. 20.f: • Over the past several months, the JCC formed a Owner Controlled Insurance Program Subcommittee and selected Aon Risk Services to serve as the Committee's Broker of Record. • This month, the Joint Cooperative Committee and the Orange County Water District approved the Subcommittee's recommendation for the selection of Zurich a total amount of $5,884,310 to provide insurance and administer the insurance program. • Orange County Sanitation District and Orange county Water District would pay equal shares of$2,942,155. (Approve the GWRS Owner Controlled Insurance Program for Workers'Compensation and Excess General Liability with Zurich, for the period December 15, 2001 through February 1, 2006, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares not to exceed$2,942,155) WS:jo G:bNp.dmeoywocwd 1%u11a %121?01BoardrayBwwa-J-3620r.doo It a C'y�� c ATTACHMENT 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD) is planning to replace a sanitary sewer pump station within 14" Street in the city of Newport Beach. The Rehabilitation of the 14'Street Pump Station, Newport Beach, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(IS/MND)(State Clearinghouse#2001111105) was prepared by OCSD and circulated for a 30-day public review period from November 15 to December 14, 2001. This Response to Comments document has been prepared to address comments received on the IS/MND pursuant to Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS The following comments on the project were received during the IS/MND review period: 1) Telephone conversation dated November 19, 2001, from Emil Matyas with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 2) Telephone conversation dated November 20, 2001, from Larry Seigel with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 3) Letter from the Gas Company, dated November 20, 2001, signed by Kris V. Keas 4) Letter from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, dated November 21, 2001 5) Letter from the California Department of Transportation, District 12, dated November 27, 2001, signed by Robert F. Joseph, 6) Telephone conversation dated November 29, 2001 from Jim Cantwell with Angie Anderson of OCSD Engineering Staff. Copies of these letters and records of the telephone conversations are attached to this document. Responses to the comments are provided below. None of the comments received would alter the text or conclusions of the IS/MND or result in any change in the proposed mitigation measures. Retnaili"tion of O Ir Strut Pwry Sution.Nea,on BnN 1 Envimmnemal Sci=e A.,taoi Initial Sway/Miciga,Ngative n Iataioo v' RESPONSE TO CoWaNTS 1) Telephone Record, Emil Matyas, November 19, 2001 Comment: Mr. Maryas inquired as to the height of the proposed building. Response: The height of the support building would be 20 feet above grade to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. The architecture of the building would integrate with the surrounding area. 2) Telephone Record, Larry Siegel, November 20, 2001 Comment: Mr. Siegel inquired m to the effects of the project on local traffic. Response: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa as the new station is to replace an existing station. The actual construction activities would disrupt traffic as described in the IS/MND for approximately 2 months by closure of one lane of traffic in each direction. At least one lane of traffic in both directions will be kept open at all times during construction. The street will be restored to its original appearance. 3) The Gas Company Comment: The comment letter states that The Gas Company has facilities in the area that could be altered without significant effect on the environment. Response: No response is necessary. 4) Governor's Office of Planning and Research Comment: The letter acknowledges receipt of the IS/MND and provides a distribution list. Response: No response is necessary. 5) California Department of Transportation Comment: The comment letter states that Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no comments on the project. Response: No response is necessary. 6) Telephone Record, Jim Cantwell, November 29, 2001 a biliulion of Ne 11^Sleeel Pump Simon.Newport Unh 2 Emi..I&ek A.i. Inhul SAW,IMifWwd Ne &.Dcd.rn- V Comment: Mr, Cantwell requested a copy of the IS/MND. Response: A copy of the IS/MND was sent to Mr. Cantwell as requested. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the need for the project and why the proposed building would be 20-feet high. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the 10 Street Pump Station has deteriorated and is in need of repairs to avoid creating sewage spills in the area. The OCSD conducted an assessment of the pump station and determined that refurbishing the existing vault beneath 10 Street would not be feasible. As a result, a nearby vacant lot property was selected to house a replacement pump station. The new pump station will not increase the capacity of the sewer line. The building height is necessary to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the owner of the property and the purchase price. Response: The comment does not pose a question regarding potential environmental effects of the project subject to CEQA review. No response is necessary. OCSD negotiations have not been finalized. Once the District decides on a purchase price, the information requested will be available as part of the public record. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asked what the contingency would be if the property were not available. Response: The project description includes purchasing the property. No other alternative sites or contingencies have been developed. If the property is not available,OCSD would redesign the project and would be subject to additional CEQA review. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asks what changes could be made to the architectural design of the proposed building. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the architectural design of the proposed building will integrate with the surrounding structures. The building will be 20 feet high, encompassing approximately 576 square feet The project will include low water landscaping maintained by OCSD. A set of building design drawings will be submitted to the city of Newport Beach. OCSD will review and incorporate the City's comments where feasible. RtlaU11"Mnoftln IrA "SWM.N�Bnd 3 F'/ommnnl S<i Avecum WWI SWY/MIIIpiM Nry inn Unli RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION - (1) Date: November 19, 2001 Initiator: Emil Matyas, Property Owner 1621 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 140 Street Pump Station Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Matyas inquired as to the why the pump station's above grade facility would be 20 feet tall. Mr. Cassidy responded, as to the reason for the 20-foot height, as follows: The District's standard is to place the floor of a new outlying pump station at least one foot above the base flood plane for the area, thus placing the building's floor two feet above the existing finish grade. The building's interior is to at least 12 feet tall due to the height of the electrical equipment, electrical conduits, ventilation ducts and lighting. One foot is allowed for the thickness of the roof. A five-foot parapet wall above the roof is planned to hide the HVAC equipment. Thus the height is to total 20 feet. Mr. Cassidy also noted that building's architecture is to integrate with the surrounding area. There is the three-story residential building to the east and the single story Edison substation building to the west. a RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION - (2) Date: November 20, 2001 Initiator: Larry Siegel West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Siegel inquired as to what effects would the project have on traffic on Balboa Blvd. over the 18-month construction schedule. Mr. Cassidy noted the following: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa Blvd as the new station is to replace an existing station. The 18-month schedule covers from the time the District awards the construction contract to the time the District accepts the new station as complete. Actual construction in the field would be less with work in the street to be approximately 2 months. The work in the street is to consist of extending the existing gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd from the existing station to the new site and demolishing the existing station. The extension of the gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd. is expected to take only four weeks to complete. The demolition of the existing station to five feet below finish grade is also expected to take only four weeks. One lane of traffic in each direction will be kept open at all times during the work conducted in the street. Mr. Cassidy also noted that the median above the existing station is to be restored to its current appearance (minus the staircase down to the pump station) or modified to add additional parking. The District is to request of the city which option is desired. —! Somaern Calltomla Gas Company Oran9p Coast aa9lon The .. ;� 7, PO Go.Ma Gas . .. ._ _.Anaheh .CA 92 IMU / Company _ A(J�Sempra Energy,company November 20, 2001 O.C. Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue _ Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Jim Herberg Subject: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of 14th Street Pump Station in Newport Beach This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Souther California Gras Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas facilities within the service area of the project could be altered or abandoned as necessary without any significant impact on the environment. Information regarding construction particulars and any costs associated with initiating service may be obtained by contacting the Planning Associate for your area, Dave Baldwin at(714) 634-3267. Sincerely, Kris V. Keas Technical Supervisor Orange Coast Region KVK/mm miw.'g . o 1 �= STATE OF CALIFORNIA R GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH •"mom,.✓' Gray Davis State Clearinghouse Steven A Nissen GOvERNOR DIRECTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT DATE: November 21,2001 TO: James D. Herberg — Orange County Sanitation District - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 -,-, RE: Rehabilitation of thel4th Street Pump Station,Newport Beach _ - - SCH#: 2001111105 = This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Date: November 15,2001 Review End Date: December 14,2001 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: California Coastal Commission Caltrans,District 12 Department of Fish and Game,Region 5 Department of Health Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources Native American Heritage Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Program The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the State Clearinghouse review process. I0 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3 SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95912-30" 91"54513 FAX91632}3018 WWW.OPILCAGOVICLFARINGHOUSF HTML •"• � STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4dAS ° GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCHSi Gay Davis State Clearinghouse Sceven A. Nissen GOVERNOR DIRECTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT DATE: November 21, 2001 TO: James D. Herberg — Orange County Sanitation District -- 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: Rehabilitation of thel4th Street Pump Station,Newport Beach _ SCH#: 2001111105 This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Date: November 15,2001 Review End Date: December 14,2001 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: California Coastal Commission Caltrans, District 12 Department of Fish and Game,Region 5 Department of Health Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department ofWater Resources Native American Heritage Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Program The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the State Clearinghouse review process. 14W TENTH STREET P.O. a0X 3044 SACK ENTO. f IFORNIA 95812.3044 9164454013 FAX916-323-3018 WWW.OPILCAGOVICLEAWNGHOUSEHTML a a STATE OF CAUFORNIA—BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GMY DAVIS.Gwe. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3337 ALdbLson OM Smte 380 Iry ,CA.9M124UM November 27, 2001 Mr. Jim Herberg File: IGR/CEQA Engineering Manager SCH#: None Orange County Sanitation District Log * 990 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Rehabilitation of 14" Street Pump Station Dear Mr. Herberg, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated November 13, 2001 on the Rehabilitation of 10 Street Pump Station project. The Orange County Sanitation District proposes to construct a new pump station facility on 1514 West Balboa Boulevard to replace an existing station (to be decommissioned) located at the intersection of West Balboa and W street on the Balboa Peninsula in the City of Newport Beach. Caltrans District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and has no comments at this time. However, in the event of any activity in Caltrans right way an encroachment permit Is required. Applicants are required to plan for sufficient permit processing time, which may include engineering studies and environmental documentation. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and other future developments, which could potentially impact our transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please do not hesitate to call Maryann Molavi at(949)724-2267. Si ce ly, Robert F F. os. eph J , ChieIf IGR/Community Planning Branch c: Ron Heigeson, HQ IGR/Community Planning RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(3) Date: November 29, 2001 Initiator: Jim Cantwell 1511 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA 92663 Respondent: Angie Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 14'°Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the following: Why is project needed?Are there capacity issues; if so, is the pipeline or pump station causing the problem? Why is the proposed building height so high? What is the name of the person who currently owns the property? What is the purchase price for the vacant lot? What happens if OCSD is unable to purchase the lot? What influence does the project manager have on the architectural design of the building?Are you able to make changes? Ms. Anderson noted that he would have to speak directly to the Project Manager (William Cassidy)for answers to detail questions. Ms. Anderson also informed Mr. Cantwell that Mr. Cassidy would return his call. (Mr. Cassidy returned Mr. Cantwell's call twice later that day and again on December 3r0, reaching only Mr. Cantwell's answering machine. Mr. Cassidy requested a return call, leaving his direct number.) Mr. Cantwell also request a copy of the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ms. Anderson mailed a copy as request. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 19,2001 —7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: 5 City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Huntington Beach Debbie Cook' Connie Boardman La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian' Orange Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy' U1ead\data1\wy.dta\agenda\BoaN Agandas\2001 Board Agendas\121901 minute eacerpts.dm ater environment 1' Fed rat] n a � K California Water Environment Association & Water Environment Federation Present CONTROL OF FATS, OILS, & GREASE (FOG) ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE January 29-30, 2002 Atrium Hotel at Orange County Airport Irvine, California EPASupported in cooperative agreement by US Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Water Rater Environment Federations »even rag&EnbanC g the elohal utter Etwlrotaaet6 601 Wythe Street Alexandria,VA 22314-1994 USA www.werorg TRAINING COURSE (This course has limited space.-Plane Register Early-Please do not make travel arrangements until registration is confirmed.) CONTROL OF FATS,OILS,&GREASE FACULTY (FOG) Jan Pickrel ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE EPA Headquarters-Office of Water, Washington, DC COURSE DESCRIPTION Over the last few years, WEF, in partnership with Leon Holt the US EPA, has developed a Fats, Oils, and Town of Cary,North Carolina Grease Control Training Course and has been conducting workshops at various locations across Nick Arhontes the county. Orange County Sanitation District After the success of this Introductory FOG Control Jack Dickinson course, WEF has developed an advanced FOG City of San Jose, California training. Utilizing the knowledge of experts already involved in the control of fats, oils, and Craig Stone grease, this new course presents implementation Former Restaurateur,Avery, California details for a variety of FOG control options for fats,oils,and grease. HOTEL INFORMATION Atrium Hotel at Orange County Airport The purpose of the training course is to present a 18700 Mac Arthur Boulevard well developed approach that can be used by Irvine,CA 92612 utilities to design and implement their own site- (800) 854-3012 specific FOG control programs for preventing or (949)757-0330 eliminating the entry of FOG into the collection system. - Rate: $99.00 per night,government rate same Airport Shuttle:Free shuttle,use courtesy AGENDA phone at airport. January 29, 2002 Parking: $9.00 a day valet Registration: 7:30 am. - 8:30 a.m. $6.00 a day self-parking Course: 8:30 am. - 5:00 p.m. CONTACT HOURS January 30, 2002 WEF will issue a Certificate of Attendance to Course: 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. each participant recording 12 contact hours for the Advanced FOG Course. COURSE FEE ADDITIONAL COURSE INFORMATION ADVANCE $200 For additional information concerning course (On or before January 11,2002) content,please contact Patrick Bradley,USEP-A, ON-SITE $250 at 202-564-0729. (After January 11,2002) For additional information about other Hot Topic Registration Deadline: Registrations received Workshops,contact the WEF Customer Service after January 11,2002 will be processed on a Center at 1-800-666-0206 or visit the WEF web space-available basis at the onsite rate. page at www.wefore. ADVANCED FOG CONTROL TRAINING COURSE MODULES Introduction/Overview Design Issues • Assuring effective grease trap/interceptor Marketing of Your Grease Control Program design • How to convince your administration and • Sample collection stakeholders that they need an Oil& • Bioremediation Grease Control Program • Alternative Methods: Generation and Interception Permits • Identification and Classification of Operation &Maintenance Issues Sources Grease trap and interceptor MOM • Permitting Process . How do I ensure the use of reputable waste haulers? Legal Authority How can I confirm that FOG wastes are Writing good sewer use ordinances and properly disposed of7 grease control regulations • Lateral cleaning issues—Who's • Sample ordinances from several responsible for the grease? successful programs Vapor hood cleaning • Attorneys Case Studies • EPA-CID Case Studies Additives • Pros/Cons Enforcement • Case studies • Violation recognition • Grease Control Program Record- Enforcement response guide keeping/Information Management • Enforcement documents • Integration of Oil&Grease Program • Fines &penalties - information into Collection Systems Oil&Grease Management databases/information systems • Tracking the effectiveness of your FOG • Grease creators Control Program • Pollution prevention • Permitting and inspection Success Stories • Disposal and containment Additional Resources for Implementing Effective Inspection Training Grease Control Programs Review Current Regulations • Inspection Techniques Summary • Gathering Facility Operational Data • Completing Inspection Forms • Inspection Concerns and Recommendations l FOG COURSE REGISTRATION FORM Irvine,California Registration Instructions Please send me WEF/CWEA membership information_ Complete the registration form below. Payment must accompany registration forms. (Photocopies of checks are not acceptable.) Make checks payable to California Water Environment Association. Approved US government purchase orders must accompany the registration form. To Register By Fax: (credit card&purchase orders only) (510)382-7810 By Mail (Check, credit card,Government Purchase Order)to: CWEA 7677 Oakport Street,Suite 525 Oakland,CA 94611 AMOUNT Advance or before January 11,2002) $20.00 On-site(after January 11, 2002) $250.00 TOTAL PAYMENT(Payment must accompany this form.) Deadline:January 11,2002 Registration Forms will not be processed after the deadline. Last Name First Name Company. Job Title: Address City State Country Zip Telephone Fax Email Method of Payment: ❑ Government PO (0) PO No. 0 Company Check(C) Check No. ❑ Personal Check (P) Check No. ❑ AMEX ❑ Master Card ❑ VISA ❑ DISCOVER Credit Card Number Expiration Date Signature I authorize CWEA to charge my credit card for the amount listed above. Written cancellation notice is required,and must be received at least 30 days prior to the conference date. A 25%service fee shall be retained on all cancellations. No refunds shall be given for cancellations made less than 30 days prior to a ny conference. fresnobee.com Local News Page l of 3 T Home Local News i Marketplace i Sports CentralValley i JobQuest i Archive i Spoon email th' printthii *aetthe_daay lawlsuhs[n�t°Me°r'^t T I v t bulletin article article edition Local NEWS • Plea Kings rejects addition of sludge postp • LOCAL County refuses to extend an sea c; Politics agreement with Orange County. . Dea Agriculture By Kern Glnis ezten The Fresno Bee chart Faith&Values (published Wednesday, December, 19, Births 2001 9:39AM) • Con backs STATE HANFORD--After listening to two hours of testimony Tuesday,Kings NATIONAL County supervisors unanimously voted not to allow Orange County to state WORLD continue putting treated sewage sludge on farmland near Corcoran for • Mac the next eight years. over. SPORTS accell BUSINESS The Orange County Sanitation District requested an eight-year extension . Nen LIFESTYLE under Kings County's biosolids ordinance,which limits the type of tees. OPINION sewage sludge that can be used as farmland fertilizer. hare, COLUMNISTS •San' SPECIAL REPORTS The Sanitation district bought 1,800 acres from Kings County farmer elves Shaer Magan for$3.5 million in June 2000, before the board passed its place GALLERIES ordinance. That land was purchased so the sanitation district could truck Courts OBITUARIES in sewage sludge from Orange County and use it to fertilize the land. Natlol SPEAK OUT .GP. TEXT ONLY Now that the board denied the extension, Orange County has only one ftb-U more year to bring certain types of sludge into Kings County. Within five attsr WEATHER years, it will be allowed to put only a composted form of the material on puarr ABOUT US the land. M Run um FEEDBACK Mum RESOURCES "I think[the board] made an excellent decision,'Hanford resident death MARKETPLACE Manuel Pereira said. "We have enough of this stuff coming in right now, draw: YELLOW PAGES and we don't want anymore. We're tired of it." • Nev dead, SHOPS The ordinance, adopted in January,calls for the removal of Class B Work NATIONAL PARKS biosolids from farmland by January 2003. Class B biosolids are sewage falls.I comics sludge that contains pathogens,or disease-causing microorganisms. Sport CROSSWORD • Nor GAMES Officials with the sanitation district maintain that using Class B biosolids anybr as fertilizer does not pose a threat to people or the environment. The NEWSPAPERS IN district may consider filing a lawsuit. • NFL EDUCATION alrea. SUBSCRIBE "We're very disappointed," said Blake Anderson, the district's general COMMUNITIES manager. "We believe we made our case. The use of biosolids on a CENTRALVALLEY agricultural land is an appropriate use of that material." Seam F— file://C:%TEMP\fresnobee.com Local News.htm 12/19/2001 fresnobee.com I Local News Page 2 of 3 VIDA EN EL VALLE 1--1 ,{ FRESNO Sanitation districts in Orange County and Los Angeles County,which or,se NEIGHBORS bring thousands of tons of treated sewage sludge to farmland in the Mon CLOVIS Central Valley each year,already sued Kern County in an effort to Loa INDEPENDENT overturn its restrictive biosolids ordinance. A judge ruled against the Eat SIERRA GATEWAY Southern California agencies in November. Ce Community Calendar Slud �Q Mppenin9I" plants. lea classified�into three is what's lcategories: Class B, Classeft after wastewater is treated and Class A fte IN vasay EQ,which stands for"exceptional quality." Kings County's ordinance eventually bans classes B and A,which contain traces of pathogens or disease-causing microorganisms. The Opar county is allowing only Class A in a compost form,which doesn't contain pathogens and is mixed with green waste to lower the level of heavy metals. ,,I P The ordinance allows people who already have permits for applying sewage sludge two years to switch to Class A. Within five years,they can use only the "exceptional quality" compost form. When Orange County purchased the land from Magan,it also obtained ownership of the permits to apply biosolids. It claims that Orange County taxpayers have a$3.5 million investment in the land,which they will lose if the district can't put Class B biosolids on the property for at least the next eight years. "We invested a great deal of money to be good neighbors,"said Tom Woodruff, a lawyer for the sanitation district. "The mg got pulled out from under us,and now we can't go on with our plans. Our taxpayers just want to recoup on their investment." Kings County counsel argued,however,that the only way an extension would be granted is if the sanitation district installed or constructed permanent improvements on the land.Those improvements can be pumps,wells,fences or other types of infrastructure. Woodruff claimed the permits should be considered improvements to the land,because it increases the value of the land.He also said the permits allow the district to put biosolids on the land,which he believes improves the quality of the farmland. "The 1,800-acre parcel of farmland didn't have much value,except for the permit,"he said.The property had an assessed value ofjust more than$1 million. Peter Moock, assistant county counsel, disagreed and said the permits are not viewed as an improvements under the ordinance: "Permits are not improvements;they are not tangible things. A permit may have value, but the reality is this ordinance says you have to install or construct file://C:\TEW\fresnobee.com Local News.htm 12/19/2001 fresnobee.com Local News Page 3 of 3 permanent improvements." Residents who attended the hearing Tuesday applauded the board's action.Some said(range County needs to find somewhere else to dispose of its waste. "I think we have a fair ordinance,"Hanford resident Maxine Wade said. "I think these people should start thinking of a way to purify their sludge and use it in another way." The reporter can be reached at kginisQ.fresnobee.com or 622-2417. Speak Out! on News We invite your comments about this article. Registration is required for participation in our Speak Outl forums. Please be aware you are entering a public forum and your messages can be viewed by others. If you are trying to contact the reporter,please visit our About Us section. You only need to register once. If you have already registered please click on Post to participate or View to read messages. ParrI re file:HC:\TEW\fresnobee.com Local News.him 12/19/2001 CHAIR'S REPORT TO THE BOARD AT THE DECEMBER 19, 2001 MEETING 1 . THE STEERING COMMITTEE DID NOT MEET TODAY. 2. THE ONLY WORKING COMMITTEES SCHEDULED TO MEET IN JANUARY ARE THE FAHR COMMITTEE, WHICH WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 9TH AT 5 P.M., AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE, WHICH WILL MEET AT 5 P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23RD. THE OMTS AND PDC COMMITTEES ARE DARK IN JANUARY. 3. THE AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING ON URBAN RUNOFF WILL MEET SOMETIME IN JANUARY. THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE BEING POLLED BY STAFF TO FIND A GOOD DATE. 4. YOU WILL NOTE THAT SEVERAL OF OUR MEMBERS ARE NOT IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT. THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES IS HOLDING ITS ANNUAL MEETING THIS WEEK. REMEMBER THAT THE SEPTEMBER 1 ANNUAL MEETING WAS MOVED TO DECEMBER BECAUSE OF THE ATTACK ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER. THERE ARE SOME VERY IMPORTANT LEAGUE COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS HELD BY OUR MEMBERSHIP AND THEIR ATTENDANCE WAS CRITICAL. 5. 1 WANT TO WELCOME /'" OF AND OF AS NEW MEMBERS OF THE SANITATION DISTRICT'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS. YOU WILL FIND THAT THE STAFF AND THE BOARD ARE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND WORK WELL TOGETHER. THERE ARE MANY INITIATIVES THE BOARD WILL BE DEALING WITH IN THE UPCOMING YEAR THAT WILL HAVE LONG-LASTING IMPACTS ON THE FUTURE DIRECTION OF THE DISTRICT. IN ORDER TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND THE ISSUES AND HOW THE DISTRICT OPERATES, THERE WILL BE A NEW DIRECTORS WORKSHOP SCHEDULED AFTER THE 2 NEW YEAR. IF ANY OTHER DIRECTORS WISH TO ATTEND, YOU ARE MORE THAN WELCOME. YOUR ALTERNATES AND KEY STAFF ARE ALSO WELCOME. AS SOON AS THE DATE IS SET, YOU WILL RECEIVE NOTIFICATION. 6. THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITARY AGENCIES IS HOLDING ITS MID-YEAR MEETING IN PALM SPRINGS JANUARY 16T" THROUGH THE 19T" THERE ARE SEVERAL OPENINGS IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT. I URGE YOU TO ATTEND AT LEAST ONE CASA MEETING DURING THE NEXT YEAR TO GET A STATE-WIDE PERSPECTIVE ON THE ISSUES FACING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES LIKE OURS. PLEASE CONTACT LISA MURPHY OR JEAN TAPPAN, THE GENERAL MANAGER'S SECRETARY, AT 593-7101 NO LATER THAN MONDAY, JANUARY 7T" IF YOU ARE INTERESTED. 3 7. 1 WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ONE ITEM ON THE AGENDA OUT OF ORDER TONIGHT. IT IS ITEM 20(F) REGARDING THE OWNER-CONTROLLED INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM. OUR GUEST PRESENTERS FROM THE WATER DISTRICT AND FROM OUR INSURANCE BROKER NEED TO LEAVE EARLY. SO I WANT TO MOVE ITEM 20(F) TO FOLLOW ITEM 8. IS THERE A SECOND? APPROVED. 8. AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO ASK GUY CARROZZO TO JOIN ME. PRESENTATION OF RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION 4 • The Orange County -1 The Orange County ikq' Pe Water District < Sanitation District r Groundwater w Replenishment System Owner Controlled Insurance Program OCSD Board Presentation AON Wednesday, December 19, 2001 Insure your vision Marketing Summary • ACE USA/ CIGNA • AIG • CNA • HARTFORD • KEMPER INSURANCE GROUP • LIBERTY MUTUAL • ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE • TIG • TRAVELERS • ZURICH AON e, ,,� Insure your vision Market Conditions • Market Conditions are expected to Tighten and Prices to Increase Significantly after January 1 , 2002 • Property Reinsurance Treaties • California Workers' Compensation Rate Increase • World Trade Center (WTC) Impact { d 00 LION 'a,,..✓ Insure your vision Qualified Finalists AIG St. Paul Zurich Aff AT ,4f X/ ,4f X/ $59158,646 $591209230 $496189746 �a • AON � d Insure your vision OCWD/OCSD GWR System OCIP Construction Hard Costs $270,000,000 - 4 Year Term Conventional Insurance (Imbedded in Contracts) Construction Payroll $ 48,600,000 Composite WC Rate (Open Rating) $ 14.75 Contractor WC Premium $ 7,168,500 Contractor GLAS Premium $ 1 ,701 ,000 Total Contractor WC/GL Cost $ 8,869,500 Expected Contractor Credits (95%) $ 8,462,025 AON,,,,d Insure your vision OCWD/OCSD GWR System OCIP Construction Hard Costs $270,000,000 - 4 Year Term Wrap-Up Concept OCIP Premium WC/GL ($3.41/$9.50 per $100 of Payroll) $ 1,657,300 to $4,618,746 Zurich A.M. Best. ,4fX!/ (at maximum losses) Excess Liability ($50 Million) $ 650,000 (est.) OCIP Administration* $ 580,562 Total OCIP Cost $ 2,887,862 to $5,849,308 Expected Contractor Credits (95%) from Conventional Insurance $ - 8,462,025 Estimated Savings from Implementing OCIP $ 2,612,717 to $5,574,163 Details pertaining to the proposed Administration Fee were provided under Appendix C of the written proposal AON �*as Insure your vision Additional Benefits • Rates Guaranteed for Term of Project • Policies Non-Cancellable for Term of Project • 5 Year Products/Completed Operations Extension following Project Completion { t�QN Insure your vision Other Coverages Currently Being Considered • Builder's Risk • Pollution • Professional AON •0M ,,,,d' Insure your vision Budget Estimates Initial Payment: $ 4615874 10% of Zurich* $ 6505000 100% of Excess $ 1455141 1/4 of Aon Admin.* $ 35M Deposit On Builder's Risk $ 1 ,292,015 TOTAL * Remainder of Zurich's Premium and Aon's Admin. Fee will be due as follows: $ 692,813 Due 4/1/02 $ 1 ,299,828 Due 12/1/02 $ 1 ,299,827 Due 12/1/03 $ 1 ,299,827 Due 12/1/04 a $ 5,884,310 Total Payments AON Insure your vision ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: /L� -/S-&I TIME: (MURPHY)........................ALVAREZ...................... ✓ ✓ — (SIMONIAN) .....................ANDERSON................... � t — (FLORY) ..........................BANKHEAD................... _g� r", — (LARSON) ........................ BOYD.............................. �L — (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................ ✓ ✓ _ (CRANDALL) ...................CARROZZO................. i — (BOARDMAN)....................819014......................... ✓ ✓ — (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... ✓ �L — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. �� — (SCHAFER)......................FERRYMAN.................... . i — (DUVALL)........................> N.................... �L — (DEBOLT).........................JEMPSA...................... ✓ — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... i ✓ yms/,4oaS3 (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ ✓ — (BROADWATER).............. LEYES.......................... (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... (CHRISTY)........................ M&01:146AN.................._,L ✓ — (SIMONOFF) .................... MOORE........................�L ✓ — (EPPERSON) .................. NEUGEBAUER.............. � �L — (FRESCHI)........................ PATTERSON................. Y00%/p (KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ —7 - — (ADAMS) .......................... RIDGEWAY................... 7 _ (DOW)...............................SIGLER.........................�L 7 — (SMITH, CHUCK) .............SILVA........................... _,/ — (BLAKE)............................WALKER....................... C✓ r/ — STAFF: ptic 4wht4 Anderson ✓ ti ar /SGx " Ghirelli Kyle Wilk Ludwin Mathews Miles ✓ Murphy Ooten / Tomko i Streed OTHERS: ✓ Woodruff Andrus Nixon A4 12/19/01 \UeadWatalWM.dtaUdn In\BSIDIRECTORMi scim Roa CaO.doc �^' REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution DATE: 2 o- U I �AGEENDA ITEM N . � I� NAME: (please print) Gl L HOME ADDRESS: Zp Z- (O N (7L 1J k (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 1 �7 I �1'7�P( /' 0 (o REPRESENTING: ��� y �t l n'I A- ll� YY1A/ j I AlvAN1 (self/name of organization) • ✓ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.p DATE: li2e.. / AGENDA ITEM NO. Pc watY'p'L + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NAME: (please print) rb urt Ko y-f L� HOME ADDRESS: (C) Ld ll-k r Utf::�4 (number/street) 5A-a � (A q07�-J (city/zipcco'7de) 2 -¢Q TELEPHONE: O`2 J o — 2 ` / S- REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) V REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) k-7 / re e W W& � HOME ADDRESS: "'o (number/street) (4, b, C /1- 0(AP 8 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: �VJ (self/name oforganization) .// REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to theBoard Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: D (number/street) (city/zip71"[' O l code) C _ TELEPHONE: - L24s REPRESENTING: C'�'fr .meg , 'W/� - !��, �j/F / (self/name of organization) t/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution,,. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. �#//fY ph #�f�W,f�1i # * Y Y Y NAME: (please print) �7 ! IU�/p ✓ � %gleJ KIU� HOME ADDRESS: (number/ treet) kel� (city/zip code)�/Q TELEPHONE: ®®��l ( - REPRESENTING: ()Le� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �7®� (number/street) /J k (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �(4%yrf'o*4.9-� REPRESENTING: 0 0� (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: l�'" (� ' AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (n'u^�ber/street) �1,eA-> (kt (city/zzl) CCod ) it{ q TELEPHONE: ` I l` 7Z1, ' I REPRESENTING: Oft 3 (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: le7 OAG D I AGENDA ITEM NO. P013 C— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ad-- HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) CGNj� y (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �j+�4 77 REPRESENTING: a (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the thhe Boa(rdd Sec(retary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �1re / AGENDA ITEM NO. * * . . ' . e ' * ' NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/st t (city/zip c de) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT lali9L BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM (pleaseprint) leaseprint) a ® © o� lAbAuh CMS4,v1k/ likc4- L APAr.5 2l• oGS D J u�k Dr?4 ( �0,I,A m,*,N j 0 a O NIWRDTA%WINMWORMBl nWIN FORW. rEW PpRr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH g C,</F00.N�P C�(21G �1.� Sow S4C cm P"fS is Ertir October 16, 2001 g r�,P(P 4 Co . K Blake Anderson General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mr. son: Enclosed please find an executed Resolution in Opposition to the Application by the Orange County Sanitation District for a Section 301(H) Waiver From the Federal Clean WaterActapproved by the Newport Beach City Council on September 25, 2001. If you have any questions, please contact me at 949-644-3002. Sincerely, IMff Assistant City Manager City of Newport Beach Enclosure City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard • Newport Beach, California 92663-3884 Resolution 2001-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH IN OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION BY THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FOR A SECTION 301(H) WAIVER FROM THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT WHEREAS,the City of Newport Beach is a member agency of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD);and WHEREAS,OCSD is a special district that provides wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal services to 21 cities,three special districts and unincorporated Orange County with about 2.2 million residents in central and northern Orange County,including the residents and businesses of Newport Beach;and WHEREAS,OCSD uses a 10' diameter Ocean Outfall to discharge approximately 240 million gallons per day of wastewater from OCSD's 2.2 million customers;and WHEREAS,50%of the wastewater discharged out the Ocean Outfall is wastewater treated to an advanced primary treatment level and 50%is wastewater treated to a secondary treatment level;and WHEREAS,the Ocean Outfall that sits 2W below the ocean surface about 4.5 miles offshore from the Santa Ana River mouth between Huntington Beach and Newport Beach;and WHEREAS,this discharge creates a treated wastewater plume in the ocean that can be up to 6 miles long,2 to 3 miles wide and 100 feet thick;and WHEREAS,OCSD's 20-Meter Fecal Coliform Study in 1996 showed that the wastewater Flume may-under certain wave,tidal,and current conditions-approach the shoreline where it can contaminate the beaches and swimming areas of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach; and WHEREAS,data from testing station C2-between Yi and Y2 of a mile off of the ocean beaches of Newport Beach-may show that the wastewater plume approaches swimming areas used by thousands of visitors daily;and WHEREAS,the 1972 federal Clean Water Act requires most Publicly-Owned Treatment Works(POTWs)to treat all wastewater to full secondary levels before such wastewater can be discharged from a treatment facility;and WHEREAS, the Act was amended in 1977 to authorize POTWs to request a waiver of this full secondary requirement from the US Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA)under Section 301(h)of the Act as long as the POTW can show that the less-then-full-secondary discharge does not harm the environment or harm public health;and WHEREAS,OCSD requested and was granted a waiver under Section 301(h)by US EPA in 1935,with an extension granted in 1998pursuant to the treatment and monitoring requirements, and WHEREAS,the current waiver(as extended)expires June 2003;and WHEREAS,as projected by a 1999 Environmental Impact Report associated with OCSD's Strategic Plan,full secondary treatment of wastewater further reduces but does not eliminate levels of fecal coliform bacteria and viruses,and WHEREAS,sanitation agencies in Los Angeles County have not applied for new waivers under Section 301(h)and are in the process of treating all wastewater at full secondary levels; and WHEREAS,all or a significant portion of the additional expense of constructing and maintaining facilities associated with full secondary treatment at OCSD will likely be borne by the ratepayers of OCSD,including the residents and businesses of Newport Beach;and WHEREAS,Newport Beach relies upon a safe,dean ocean to sustain its quality of life and its economic and tourism base;and WHEREAS,the residents of Newport Beach use the ocean and its beaches for health recreation,and business endeavors,including fishing,boating,and swimming;now,therefore be it RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that it hereby opposes any extension of or application for a waiver of full secondary discharge requirements under Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act by OCSD;and be it also RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that it hereby supports the full secondary treatment of all wastewater discharged into OCSD's Ocean Outfall;and be it also RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that it hereby urges its resident and business population to join with the Council in advocating for safer,less environmentally impadful wastewater discharge into the Pacific Ocean and in recognizing and accepting the community-wide obligation and financial costs that lie therein. ADOPTED this 25ffi Day of September,2001. wdlr�`ul GAROLD B.ADAMS Mayor of Newport Beach ATTEST:/T:/ C/Y/U87Vn[ LAVONNE HARKLESS mi Newport Beach City Clerk �5 a r GUFOP? STATE OF CALIFORNIA F COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ) I, LAVONNE M. HARKLESS,City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California,do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2001-83 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the 26th day of September, 2001, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Heffernan,O'Neil,Ridgeway,Glover,Bromberg,Proctor,Mayor Adams Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said City this 26th day of September,2001. City Clerk Newport Beach, California (Seal) G A gt�ropH. CITY MANAGER i r o" m CITY HALL �a U oc �2, y19a�1 _ '^ ssa) New ion Boulevard " 0 .3 2 y '- z : I - a'— P.O. BOX 1768 .� �CP aiaieie o roa+a Newpon Beach, California 92658-8915 x'x. S.H Cft 927 1U/19/C11 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED Blake Anderson General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue $ Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 w " ez�oe w�mv ILI„„IJLIII „LI,h,dIL,,,,dll,dLJJIII „I Huntington Beach Tom,.,w PO Box 865 'd Huntington Beach,Ca. 92648 December 11,2001 Dear OCSD Board Member RE: Opposition to 301(h)Waiver As you know Huntington Beach Tomorrow is a large community based advocacy group that looks out for the interest of our members,our citizens and our city.We are dedicated to improve Huntington Beach for today and tomorrow.The issue surrounding the Orange County Sanitation District operations and specifically the 301 (h)Waiver to the Clean Water Act has caused great concern among our citizens and members. Huntington Beach is also known as Surf City.The image of a sewage treatment plant dumping millions of gallons of not fully treated sewage off one coast is bad for the health of our citizens, our children,our image,our visitors and our local economy.The dumping has very important consequences to the many swimmers who can possibly be exposed to the bacteria and viruses from 2.4 million people. These pathogens can possibly cause eye,ear,now and throat infections, vomiting and diarrhea. The OCSD has failed to offer any proof that the sewage dumping is logical or safe. People come from around Southern California,the nation and the world to enjoy the beautiful beaches of Huntington Beach.The beach and ocean closures believed to be associated with the OCSD sewage dumping are bad for our economy and could have significant negative financial impacts on our tourist revenue,hotel residency tax,and could diminish the attraction of our new resort. The inadequately treated sewage may also be harming the ecology of the ocean,and causing fish liver lesions, invertebrate changes,and unknown effects to mammals such as dolphins and whales migrating up and down the coast.The health of our ocean is very important to our general community,our children,as well as our many sport and recreational fishermen. Therefore, Huntington Beach Tomorrow strongly opposes the continued use of the 301 (h) Waiver and urges the OCSD board members to vote against pursuing further request for the 301 (h)Waiver to the 1972 Clean Water Act. Additionally, it is unfair for the community acid citizens of Huntington Beach to continue to tolerate the air and water pollution, in addition to the smell,the bad image the sewage treatment plant has brought to our community. The cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach house the sewage treatment plants that process sewage from many inland cities. Furthermore we receive no tax revenue or benefits from the operations. In fact,we believe the facilities have a very large negative impact on the community and specifically the neighborhoods surrounding the facilities. Therefore, if any new facilities need to be built, we strongly encourage the Board Members and General Manager to look for alternate locations for additional sewage treatment facilities. We encourage the OCSD to investigate the distribution of sewage treatment facilities and processing to other areas in the district to fairly share the burden. Sincerely, '3-1� Dave Sullivan President, Huntington Beach Tomorrow p° g° n 8 U gg4c#, yz G q g �-( N '�NGi 0/9/L p r ��Si2/ cT � pgNN � LLis 14v ti N - �-^;in 9_?��r JUL-09-01 13:36 Frar:AIERICAN TRAILER INDUSTRIES.INC. 9496449247 T-399 P.01/01 Jab-585 .. ..wrnTnr M."aaron, .,....-..�+Mt't•r'nM'...�.. n-vl^+w.._,. ...,.nee"nernwr..w,..,.rrm,n.ewn+w«rernw.,.,ernunr«n VIA FACSIMILE July 9, 2001 Norm Eckenrode, Chair Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92108.7018 phone 714-962-2411 fax 714.962-0356 James W. Silva, Orange County Board of Supervisors 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 phone 714-834-3220 fax 714-8345109 Christie Whitman, EPA Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460 Senator Barbara Boxer US Senator, California 112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 phone 202-224-3553 Los Angeles: phone 213-894-5000 fax 213-394-6012 Senator Diane Feinstein US Senator, California 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 phone 202-224-3841 fax 202-228-3954 Los An0eies: phone 310.914-7300 Dear Sirs/Madams, I am very concerned about the polluted ocean off the Orange County coast. Please do all you can to save our best asset. Do not allow an extension of waiver that exempts the OCSD from mote rigorous treatment to be extended. Our beaches have already been closed to swimmers too often. About one half of this water exiting into mother ocean is raw sewage which contains live fecal,bacteria,viruses,etc., firm homes and businesses. Why,because the 1972 Clean Water Act passed by Congress has been"watered down" through a 301 (h)Waiver that exempts the OCSD from mom rigorous and costly treatment that removes most of the contaminants. Here's a quick tour when you flush...All 240mg/day goes into"Primary Treatment"This includes large settling tanks,where raw sewage for 2 hrs.settles out heavier particles,skimming crud off the top and bottom. The water moves onto the"Outfall Pipe"withal]the dissolved toilet debris,virus,and feral bacteria remaining"a hot brew as it exits into the cold ocean water. Only half of this daily dumping is treated to"Secondary,Treatment" which allows aerobic"good bacteria"to digest carbon compounds which are then skimmed off. 'The more you..rate it,the more fecal carbon you extract. Bottom line is,they believe that the salty and cold ocean water kills off the bacteria and virus indicators. Well, mother ocean may just be telling our local civilization that the ocean is not a dump. One of Califomia's best assets is the o=.an. Please support protecting it for all of our benefit. Sincerely, Courtney W"n 5I5 Poppy Avenue B Corona del Mar,CA 92625 Fax: 940-644-8247 3rra-Club Waiver Resolution doc page I J JAN A VANDERSLOOT,M.D. 2221 fat 16-Street BasesFbaaa (949)549.6326 Newport Beach.CA 92663 OAte FAX (714)848-6643 May 10,2001 Re:Proposed Sierra Club Remlteion Against the Orange County Sanitation District's 301(h) Waiver RFSOLUIYON The Orange County Chapter of the Sierra Club recommends the Sierra Club oppose the extension of the 301(h)waiver being sought by the Osage County Sanitation District (OCSD). Beckartrund;The 301(h)waiver is a permit gumtd to the Change County Sanitition District by the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board The waiver refer to an exception to the standards of the 1972 federal Clean Water Act that mandated that all sewage discharged into the waters of the United States receive full secondary treacmnt st a minimum.In 1917,the Clean Wets Act was amended to allow certain ocean dischargers to discharge has than full secondary treated sewage. Secondary teamrent refers,to a process when moss solids,bacteria and viruses are re a ved fmm the sewage prior to disciarge.Primary treatment refers to removing larger objects fmm the sewage scream only.The Orange Cousy Sanitation District applied for hand received the 301(h)waiver in 1985, It received a 3-year extension to the waiver in 1998.whidh expires in i 2003.It is currently seebrig another extension of the waver in 2003.The waiver allows the OCSD to exceed federal standards for TSS(total suspended solids)and DOD(bn)logic oxygen demand),both standards being 30mgAiler for 30 days avenge Currently,OCSD is discharging 240 mgd(million gallons a day)of a 50/50 blend of primary and secondary tronad sewage through a 10-foot outfall pipe extending 5.1 miles off the coast of Huntington Shad,CA 200 feat deep,creating a sewage plume of 6 oulas by 3 milm by 100 feet.The sewage is discharged through a 6,000-foot long diffuser pipe with 5W pots.Ibis diffuser pipe extend:from the end of the outfall pipe north cgs the mast OCSD discharges a teal of 15,000 metric tome a year of TSS a year,m concentrations of 55mgA of TSS and 80 mgA BOO.The permit al lows a naxin um of 20.000 metric tons of solids a year. The recently approved Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)will diver up to 100 mgd of secondary treated sewage to the Orange County Weer District(OCWD)fmm OCSD for ternary tnxtrnent,disinfection,and injection¢to the groundwater basin under Orange County for drinking-water use.The brine from this proces,will go out the outfall pipe.Because of growth,the omfall discharge in the year 2020 wilt milt be 240mgd.with increases of primary treated sewage to 809/6 of the oucfal1.and TSS of 17,000 metric tom of solids into the ocean each year.The sewage pluss is thought by OCSD to remsin trapped offshore by a temperance thermoclme that caps the plume and prevent;it from reacting the surface of the ocean or the shore.It moves up mid down the mast fmm the end of the discharge pipe.The permit granted by IPA and RWQCB is mndibon ed by a monitoring requirement that OCSD show no harm to the environment or the public health wi h annual reports. These reports sell slow effects on the environment in finding fish liver lesions near the outfall pipe. The reports omit evidence that the plume may reach shore with elevated battenal readings in 1996.In 1999,mid the years afterward, the City of Huntington Beach has expetitmed beach closures and beach postings due to elevated bacterial readings.In November,2000,a study by UCI scientist Stanley Grant,put forth the theory ben the wanm discharge into the ocean by the AES power plant in Huntington Beach pokes a hole to the therroccline,emainuyt the bactene from the OCSD sewage plmme and drawing the bacteria to the beach This theory is being tested „ver Resolution.doc J Page 7.. JAN A VANDERSLOOT,M.D. 2221 Fast 16”Suce1 Berne Phone Q949)54&6326 Newport Beecd CA 92663 Once FAX -714)&4&6643 in the smnmer of 2001,with a$4.1 million study conducted by OCSD.The thermndine is largely �I absent fmm October through April each year.The OCSD analyss of movmtent of the plume does not account for upwellings or intend wive events the may bring tla plume to shme.The cost of full secondary treatment is said by OCSD to be$400 million.The cost per person in Orange County would be 5 cents per day.For a two-person household the oust is$36 per year and for a 4-person household,the cost is S75 per year.The argument From OCSD is that it is net so much the cost,but the land disposal of increased biosolids(sludge),increased air emissions from full secondary,and increases in energy requirod for full secondary,that they wan the waiver.In April 2000,Chair Norm Eckenmde of OCSD asked for a feasileifty study of full seomdery treatment, based on public comments.Orange County rmepeyers pay apl m nmdely$90 per gear for sewage service.The average bill for other ratepayers in California is$185 per year, OCSD serves 2.8 million people and 650 industrial sources in a 47D square mile area Few: 1.No waives means full secondary treatment of sevnge consistent with the 1972 C lean Water Am. 2.Full secondary treatment reduces all elements of pollution in the oc urn discharge leading to a cleaner ocean 3.Full secondary treatment can lead to ultimnte ternary treatment of sewage and melammion of all Sewage water. 4. Disinfection of sewage is easier and more energy-efficient than disinfection of primary tweed Sewage. S.Fewer bacteria and vir es in sewage.Full secondary reduces bacteria by 95% 6.Cleaner beaches .. 7.Healthier fish and other ocean amamrea Cone: 1.Coss to Orange County ratepayers of 5 cans per person per day.$75 per year far a family of fom. 2.Increased biosolids disposal including increases in truekloads of bienolids per day w lend application sites in Riverside,Kem,Kings,and San Diego Counties 3.Increased resistance in disposd-sin courums to biosolids applicacon in their cowry. 4.Increases in air emissions from secondary treament facilities. 5. Increases in energy requirements for full secondary facilities 6.No monitoring requirements if no waiver. 7.Possible increase in odors from treatment facilities affecting adjacent neighbodioods. 8. Other uestmem methods including micmfiltratwh,new technologies,and disinfection with ozone and bleach can be used to disinfect primary sewage while still rmaining the waiver. 9.Full secondary only removes 95%ofbamnia from sewage.Further disinfection wll be reghtired to achieve 100%removal of bamesm 10.Wemfiltatiw of primary treated sewage will rwnove solids to below the TS3 standard of the Clean Water Act,but not below the BOD standard.Mima6ltration will still require a waiver from BOD. 11.Disinfection of aarem sewage will cost only$30 mitlim while full sacanday requires S400 million. / t. kv .GCS ley` 2 L.JPJFREDE:Et F06MDATMN Huntington IADrA9 Beach Chapter I,.IfIr.1 A: _,I "�J n' 10944 M AvWx Famtsin Valley,CA SIM AM:RE 199951rete'gspn',Us�l He p_pm. Deer W.Hffberg As members;of the District's environmental stakeholder community,Surfridw Foundation,Hummotorr Beach/Lang Beach Chapter,appreciates the oppornuaityto review and comment of the very informbfive, Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR), referenced above.As you know. we hs.ve always been,and continue to be, supportive of the joint OCSDIOCWD Groundwater Rrpicnistuftnt Project(GWR), Of the three scenarios described in the DEIR the include this optioN however,we we disappointed that OCSD does not recognize and endom Scemorm 4 (fog secondary with GWR)as the man envirownwriaLly superior option This is the only(GRW)option that My complies with the intem of the 197; Clean War"Act (CWA). Specifically among our concerns regarding the District's recommendation of scenario 2(permit limits with GWR)we the following • As indicated in the report,the concentration of pathogenic virus discharged into the ocean is one order of magnitude(I Oa)greater with the District's recommendation(scenario 2)than it is with somario 4. Neither the District nor the County Health Service routinely monitor for virus concentrations in the off shore or rear shore surf;tone This plans swummers and surfers and others that enjoy recreational water contact activities a a much grawa health risk. • The determination that scenario 2 is*envirownexatilly superior'to scenario 4 'because it generates less impact to land and air resources"should be made,at least in part,by County Ittaith agencies,and the AQMD.It is problematic as to weather the short term detrimental impact to land and air resources caused by scenario 4 is offset by the long term detrimental impact to occ,m war"quality caused by soenamo 2. • The planned use of the 78''emergency'discharge pipe off of Huntington Beach during peak wet weather events would have a detrimental impact an both the surf zone water quality,w well as the economy of our coastal communities that depend on mcome from beach visitors. • The projected Requency of ocaur"ce of use of the 78""emergency"discharge pipe(once every three years in the year 2020)does not meet any rcasonabte interpretation or the RWC,B definition of "emergency"(admemely rare and in&Num)usage. • it would be inconsistent of the RWQB,which hasaheady denied planned discharges of treated (chlorinated)secondary effluent into the new shore, to permit the p1ruuted discharges of untreated secondary effluent under anything less den extremely we and infrequent(emergency)conditions. P.O. Bo:3O87 Long Reach , California 90303 (31411 A38 . 69941 ...:.YY36 . �'�,M1• >.xx:o;«ra^"-' �x4ve:u..a:o'�m«+:«r+n<'sae•:..mx+auemwsr.rm^-:..sFmrx+awtee:vm::.-r.ai�`..�'3.�::!.W,.�'.`•.'-�,i.n ' • Increasing the ratio of primary to secondary tretued effluent into the offshore discharge pipe,a currently planned by OCSD and pemtined by their 301(h)wawa,could lead tc greater oonpenRmions of certain logic and raranogetuc polhitants released into the ocean thau tbm Inceentty allowed by the California Of Plan. It is not dear in the DM what plans(,feay)OCSDJRa W )ppfyppe problem. .,:..t. :.•,.!ar"... we would encourage the technied ataffm OCSD to continue 10 seek rotations to tteee' :> the application of microfiltratioo technology to reduce the polluted e®tltat dix.AatMd to.the_oceen,.pod . olfsite Wnporary storage to reduce the frequency of`dvie&KY discharge during piek iset weetha events. Sincerely. !0.1 t•e! 1 'm: V-.. � ra Ir Uz + je 1'.�i.,. a ., SukdolomdfibMHKA8.4Laptt:r.. - Blue Wat¢31tlk Powa•1 •: ,rs=.r•'dm '"„ '..:':�:mti> \a^!^'"` :; y.n.. a ••'gip+IcaT'C. -. .: 1v.,a:.. y(,i,^. -'H a.'.),Leta G.\. , ix . . r :M.: :,>fti :r" drto:naTd :.. di:N;:.w. :^o ::,;'i'a .,^:n;:hk}) •i.;a,ait7: •vi1' .a.:e4'. •'.r. r. .. tr;uuf i a.:':✓"' 1!;'ro.rxhPsea:+»sr i')J)�:r:E-'. :.. ':•.r.:.t0.•'ss.a3: :a•'�•••a'2 (flu:'I;i:•.' t•i•::,y+:.-�..e.: ! .:bsir ur ,,�,k -,v., :.0^.FcxLsq I: M#; wap:;Ny SH+F; 9�:'.^.ai:rb.; •rNlr.,: ..... .. . . 'r^5 , ... . .....a.aPo:p>7?l : '•a:r:r.',Ur.,a.•:y..k t i;i/. 4N::.^.i'",.':. '::.y,:. P v..,...iY:q•._: :a..� ,.i .:.'::•i , :4:.y'...f.'Jn/..C':e"{: :'11 Y..:r:: " .. _ .. .. . �j\.•e f.,..' i sl'• ...1.1 t..4 TL.I r .is.?,N.+R'^ '... .DNQ ray ..`kN 1•. - l i ' r•, !'.• ` i^Jl eaRilnaj^ T.%^'[ 1..•e LA^.aN:4�!+aIfTJ"L.:!iMyA::�^'a• .• :l::Y:e ..n . .. .'r:+t :4i :Si t..1x .. ... ...... . i cs•: ni W... :a.irLrv.. .... .. .. .. . . . '•t})::, ... . �..,� . ... . :. �Ja >•_.q- ...... ..Lt:' '1: :N'F'3n` .. .. ... t'a«!... . ,r .s,:•. :>:. .. a �. �.:,er;gtR:; A.'• . a,,r:'�.::. :. � .. .. . .:-) r .. rr. -E .'aa•`. iR aq, : .i:aii�}^n: . . :.t,. . r Y .: J;r..✓.r:r.":. .. 9.3:. - ::.p'.:N', t .... +ga<v:L!;!a'.h':.i:yal )'•Set ..ls�oO:K.n.M� .V�,41 t"I:' ."!. har:4 t..'•Y.!:•YL I+yJ�...'4 - .._ ,f . p.Yt:. ...::•. n.' ,+ .:`Lr y;d"}, Ar. r:3:;, ♦..✓.. ..;Sti {•..:r:>. . .iJ .l.f (i:� Yki•ii ' e .::1::''`.'::: :g"J.�.: •:: i n:"sNlri.S.'i"::., Iy::tl<iITS...._ .. ...: Y:qN{:1a •' 4. I!rn. :. .. i.wat,+ar•a^:•wrer<;a;�t:wx<.v y�.rcepi✓*rluasrn\eb."Ltl'a'>r,3-a:eeernam':au.!::..:..p=ta,,r:sw•w+.✓c..3:+ ,. PJa .+A1eFY:f41 ^,.vR%.6 04: r ,i'c ,„ • . , , September 4,2001 Mr.Norm Eckenrode Chair,Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708-7018 RE: Support for Full Secondary Treatment of Effluent Discharged to the Ocean Dear Mr. Eckenrode, As the Chair of the Board of Directors the Orange County Sanitation District,I strongly urge you to support full secondary.treatinent of all sewage discharged to the ocean. I find it difficult to believe that the Sanitation District continues to support a waiver from the Clean Water Act requirement for full secondary treatment. Orange County s number one pride is our beautiful collection of beaches and all that the ocean affords to residents and,importantly, visitors and tourists. I am a life-long Orange County resident and I hope you will do all you can as your position as Chair of the Board of Directors to drop the waiver to allow discharge of harmful sewage into the ocean. Sincerely, Kell K"ozuma 10 Gretel Cwrt Newport Beach, California 92663 (949)650-1961 d ale;P'-enny From: Lawson, Lisa Sent: Monday, July 02,2001 8:58 AM To: Kyle, Penny Subject: FW: Committee Members List —Original Message -- From: Dennis Baker Irnallto:bakerdjprnindspnne.mml Sent Wednesday,June 27,ZOOS 8:47 PM To: fonnfomiatknftc9d.mm SubjeCb CpmmBtee Members list Members of the Orange County Sanitation District board and district staff: My opposition to the 301 It waiver was based on the intuitive notion that dumping partially treated sewage into the ocean was bad. Since that initial conclusion,I have: • attended informative workshops at OC San. • talked to others knowledgeable on the issue • read articles and letters in the newspaper • tied to become better informed about the facts • As I attended the district sessions,it sounded pretty convincing • Maybe the district did have a good handle on the contamination issue • Should I focus on the idea that 600 acre feet of water a day is being dumped? Then I attended the: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Pacific Division annual meeting Science&Management of Costal Water Quality symposium Organized by: Dr.Stanley Grant of UCI and John Norton, director of the State Water Resources Control Board • Presenting were: • leaders of water quality research in the state • Managers of different agencies responsible for water quality • The presenters were from UCLA,USC, UCSB,UCI,Heal the Bay, Orange Coast Watch,as well as state and county agencies. • I did not see a representative of the OCSD at the symposium. 1 ,�, ae * Overflow crowd • exceeded 280 room capacity and had to be moved to the auditorium -- 4 • This is a very popular subject. • Important decisions are being based on the water testing now being done which was called into question by the presenters Dr. Stanley Grant • Variations during '99 closure matched tidal movement(moon). • Reopening at Labor Day was indeed result of drop coinciding with tidal movement. Dr. Steve Weisberg, SCCWRP • Samples in the morning vary greatly from those taken at night. Bacterial levels peak about midnight and crashes in the morning. Sampling in the morning gives lower counts,whereas sampling at night gives high counts. • Samples vary greatly from hour to hour. • Three samples taken at the same time in the same area vary quite a bit. • "Calibration"of labs indicated a disparity of results from lab to lab. • To Larry Honeyborne (health department),"We could be telling you that the tests have exceeded the AB 411 levels and by the time you have run down there and closed the beach, the levels have already dropped." Or"You've opened the beach because the tests show safe levels,but the levels have already risen again." _.. Sunny Jiang,UCIa- • Asked the question,"What do indicators indicate?" • Poor relationship between traditional bacterial indicators such as Fecal Indicator Bacteria and the presence of pathogens. • "The presence of human viruses did not correlate with the incidence of bacterial indicators,but correlated with the concentrations of F-specific coliphage." • "The results of this study call for a re-evaluation of our current water quality standards to reflect the viral quality of recreational waters and to possibly include monitoring of recreational waters for human viruses in certain areas." • Where did these standards come from and based on what?Nobody really could say. Dr. Patricia Holden,UCSB • DNA source fingerprinting • If 2 samples match with her technique,then you have the source of the pollution My impression 2 The science of detecting�n the water is"bad"is just in its infar,.., • Leading researchers are questioning the relationship of the current 3 bacterial indicators -• the presence of`bad stuff'like viruses is being missed • Where did the actual numeric standards come from and what were they based on?None of the researchers seem to have an answer. • Sampling methods are subject to doubt. • Laws such as A13411 may introduce more confusion, false alarms and problems than they solve. Sothis leaves me to return to my intuition. Dumping partially treated sewage with the accompanying bacteria and pathogens into the ocean is bad. Interpretation of the data and research may be based on the erroneous assumption that the 3 bacterial indicators now used,reflect the presence of viruses and that the absence of these indicators correlates to a lack of viruses, which it may not. Full secondary treatment with the goal of future full reclamation of the outfall effluent would remove one known source of ocean contamination. All the data now being collected and millions of dollars being spent may indicate plume movement. o It is not going to prove or disprove anything in rega[ds fo water quality until better measures, testing techniques, and indicators are in place. I ask that this board show leadership and foresight and not apply for the Clean Water Act waiver,but instead move towards full secondary treatment. This should be followed by full reclamation of water and solid waste, eliminating the need for an ocean outfall. 3 August 22,2001 Norm Ekemode,Chairman Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts RE: The 20-meter Coliform Study, October-November 1996 Please note the copy of a memo 1 wrote on January 22, 1997 (Attachment 1),providing preliminary results of the 1996 20-meter Coliform Study carried out by District's forces. Now I read that poorly treated and not disinfected sewage has crept within a mile of shore, and may or may not be a looming. The past two years has seen one constant: the District's assurance that if can be shown the sewage plume reaches shore they would certainly act to protect the public's health. Well folks, it's time to "walk the talk." Clearly,OOG(Ocean Outfall Group) has provided strong evidence to show the outfall discharge is often the culprit. It's also we that although Urban Runoffs have been suspects,this summer's expensive lock-down has not totally resolved the mystery. Stanley Grant and I are offering somewhat complementary hypotheses that fit known facts. What has the District's offered to date,other than a very emphatic "It's Not Us!" Please, "Do 'Us' a Favor and Get Rid of the Waiver." I have heard no reply to my last letter of June 27, 2001, so 1 assume you were not impressed with the data. I have followed up with other letters and presentations in Huntington Beach,Newport Beach, Irvine, Fountain Valley, and Seal Beach. OOG has striven to be polite. Our reception has generally been courteous. In one case (Irvine) we were promised a return engagement with the District also invited; in another(Seal Beach) the waiver issue was remanded to staff for report and possible resolution at an upcoming Council meeting. All the others have a "wait-and-see"attitude, wanting to hear the final scientific incantations over this summer's$5.1 M dollar effort, well over a year away. The subject of my 1997 memo has recently become quite controversial, now appearing in an Orange County Register story by Jim Hinch, titled "SEWAGE PLUME LOOMS LARGE, CLOSE- Study's preliminary results show a major pool of waste just a mile off the shoreline of Huntington Beach" published Saturday, August 16.2001. Hinch quotes as follows: 'But Jack Skinner, a local clean-water activist,and Larry Honeyboume of the Orange County Health Care Agency both said Wednesday they did not recall learning about the 1996 study before a press conference in January(2001). Now how do we judge the interesting contrast to the Los Angeles Times article by Seems Mehta that same day(?) titled,"STUDY: SEWAGE STAYS OFFSHORE Pollution: Initial tests find waste water pumped to sea no closer than a mile from Huntington." After requesting the 20-meter data from the District, Jack wrote a memo (Attachment 2) to the Harbor Quality Committee(Newport Beach)on April 28, 2001, RE: OCSD's 301(h) Waiver. In this memo he stated: `9 am writing because I have concerns about the re-issuing of the Orange County Sanitation District's 301(h) waiver. Jack provides two figures in his memo, the first showing actual Fecal Coliform mpnll00mI values which generally indicate the waste plume moved along the ocean bottom from the outfall to the shore in West Newport on November 20, 1996. A second figure, in color, was shown by llL staff at one of the District's TAC Meetings, and was included as a picture-summary of this same data distribution, showing a large area from the omfall inshore to Newport Pier and upcoast just past Huntington Pier with bottom Fecal densities 400mpn and above. Dr. Skinner recently provided me with the December 6, 1996 coversheet (Attachment 3) to the data that he was sent by OC Environmental Health on January 16, 2001. They received the information from OCSD on January 10,2001. This coversheet recalled for me the early events leading ultimately to my now infamous memo of January 22, 1997. This was my last work-product as Chief Scientist of Orange County Sanitation District. 1 am sorry that I am unable to provide copies of the figures and tables. They were with the original meow, most in gorgeous, full color, but I did have a copy of the written document. As I indicated in this memo, a really fine job was done by a number of staff in bringing together the information available to us at that time(January 1997). This mystery memo is further addressed by Hinch(OCR loc. cit.), who reports: Wednesday's findings... also appear to support a 1996 sanitation district study that tracked the plume to within a mile and a half of shore. The study has never been released to the public though a district official said Wednesday the report"is no secret." I have since heard from Dr. Jan Vandersloot(Attachment 4)that the District promised a full 20-meter report this year(June 27 PR Memo to OCSD Board). Subject: Treatment Level and Mis-information (Item 4),Are the"2NrRi er Study" results being kept secret? This paragraph goes on to say... ["Absolutely not! While a formal report was never written on this project,one is currently being prepared and will be made available to the public when completed. There are no records in the district's files documenting that this information was made available to the regulators,staff who were employed at the district during this period recall at least one interagency meeting where the data was discussed. 11 is important to note here that at the time the data was collected,the results did not appear to be alarming. While there were indications of plume-related bacteria at the 20-meter depth contour(approximately 2 miles offshore Huntington Beach)the bacteria counts on the beach were not of public health significance.) Dr.Peter Green was able to provide an update Monday night at the Huntington Beach City Council Meeting. An e-mail from Dr. Robert Ghirelli stated the report would go to the District's TAC within 30-60 days. 1 think my report may make the need an additional report moot, unless the District's is planning some new analyses and insights that could be gleaned in the next few weeks from this excellent data set. I have strongly advocated data mining from the beginning as esse(Int�ia/lJl prelude to the over$10 million dollars expended to date. 't�rwin Haydock, Ph.D. Fountain Valley Resident cc: OCSD Board Members; Paul Arms, Sierra Club OC Chapter; Bob Caustin. Defend the Bay; Janet Hashimoto, EPA Region 9; Larry Honeyboume, OCHCA Michael Rozengurt,Ph.D., Oceanographer/Hydrologist;Don Schulz,C.E., Surtltider HB/SB Chapter BWTF ;Jack Skinner, M.D.,SPON; Ken Theisen, RWQCB;Jan Vandersloot,M.D.,O00 212 ' , . .. Kyle, Penny `� From: Lawson, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, May 23,2001 8:24 AM To: Kyle, Penny Subject: FW: Director List --odgmal Message— From: Dennis Baker lm IIto:bakerdj®mindsgdng.wml Sent: Wednesday.May 23,2001 r:54 AM To: fonnformalkmCmd.com Cc: Sonia Wassgren Subject: DlmcWr Let I am unable to attend tonight's board meeting. Please present the following to the board. Members of Orange County Sanitation District Board, The OCSD"is"disposing"of a valuable commodity each day. Over 600 acre-feet of valuable water go out the Ocean Outfall per day.The cost to buy this amount of water from the Metropolitan Water District, at$450 an acre-foot,is$270,000. That's$275,000 a day. The ground water level in the Orange County aquifer is dangerously low, and continues to fall, so it is not only a matter of the monetary loss,but the actual quality and availability of water for the county. The move to reclaim some of this water is commendable. This move should be expanded to reclaim all of this valuable water. The cost to reclaim this water is competitive,$420 per acre- foot. Full secondary treatment of the county's effluent would be a contributing part of this full reclamation. By instituting full secondary treatment now,the district is fa iin a positive step towards a greater goal of full reclamation of valuable water for the whole county. Dennis Baker Corona del Mar 949.675.2199 bakerdj@mindspring.com 3 i June 27.2001 Norm Ekenrode. Chairman Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation Districts RE: Statement Regarding Noo-Consent Calendar Item 13. e-g, May 23,2001 Why Can't We Agree On a Course of Action? Without further debating the merits of additional treatment. I would like to address the 'Huntington Beach closure mystery: and present a new explanation of what happened and why. These comments should have a direct impact of decisions regarding issues such as boats, inhouse monitoring. research and the "World Class Program"being considered tonight. The bottom line answer is that the outfall is the smoking gun. Read on if you are interested in why I believe this is true. At the May meeting,valid concerns were expressed on the new boat costs,the necessity of additional research,and bringing the entire ocean monitoring program inhouse. I believe much of the concern is being driven by the heightened awareness of the District's possible role in the 1999 Huntington Beach closure. Some Board members expressed skepticism over the outfall's responsibility for beach closures, and seem willing to spend whatever it takes to prove the critics wrong. This cost is approaching$10 million dollars, with no clear end in sight! Further expenditures are not likely to hit the target without Understanding the nature of the"mystery." I am troubled with the current direction in spending more funds. During the ongoing crisis in 1999, 1 wrote GM Don McIntyre what might be done to bring closure to the problem and begin planning a response. The District's outfall was the culprit;but 1 did not know why.especially after so many years of apparently safe operations. 1 urged comprehensive and cooperative study begin immediately, while prevailing ocean conditions(la-Nifia)could still be documented and federal, state and local agency awareness was high. This call to action went unanswered;such decisions pierce the heart of the public's trust and the Board's responsibilities if they later prove to be wrong. Based on newspaper reports at that time. I also felt staff was not totally forthcoming. What Do We Study? Oceanography is a complex field that few study and even less understand. Such folks are seldom attracted to work for a sanitation district,especially one with a track record for not dealing well with scientists. Physical,chemical and biological sciences all play a role in ocean science, and high-level mastery is essential to understand normal system processes as well as special phenomena such as la-Nirla. Coastal oceanography is even more complex, because air, land and water interact with man's activities, including changes in wetlands, watersheds and fresh water inputs as well as outfall discharges. The District is unlikely to achieve"world class"without close cooperation with experts in ocean science and its meaning for outfall operations. But it is also wrong for staff to say we know nothing about the ocean off Orange County. Over S20 million has been spent since 1985 for required monitoring plus additional non- required research. data analysis and publication of results. The District's Board has I .. continued an essential role in oversight and funding, even when some may have been uncomfortable with their own depth of understanding the details. It was a former Director that called for a scientifically unimpeachable. "outside" contractor to independently defend the District's 301(h) Waiver Program. The validity of that principle has not changed. Although the District began to augment staff expertise in 1988, the inhouse program failed to move forward because the proposed permit revisions languished. Over the past few years the work has greatly escalated, often due to valid concerns(not always with scientific consensus) while the most qualified staff has left due to a variety of circumstance. The new Waiver Program approved in 1998 overly truncated the"Core'element, and institutionalized the"Special Studies"and "Regional Monitoring'elements still under development. Based on past Regional Surveys, field data collection is a huge effort over a brief period of time. Then the hard part of laboratory analyses, data management, and - most important of all - a thorough analysis and vetting that may occupy agency staff experts in many subjects for years. Finally. there is the vital paperwork to complete publication of the findings with its carefully considered meaning for human impacts and recommendations for any follow-on. Much of the recent workload reflects add-ons aimed at solving the Huntington Beach"mystery" and should be carefully sorted out to determining future program needs. I disagree that these programs will remain rooted for decades, regardless of their findings or the degree of discharge treatment. We should learn from the past and attempt to improve the future. and based on the continuing decline in ocean-quality we need to hurry along this path. Understanding the past, present, and estimated future workload is key to determining the need for new vessels and additional equipment, more qualified staff, and the look of future monitoring. To achieve "World Class"requires a better justification than provided to the Board in Staffs Background Memo for tonight's meeting. "World Class"was also the watchword of OCSD's foray into virology, and what became of that effort (so sorely needed now)? I believe that vision was correct, but the powers that be could not deal with the information that resulted from that dream. Scientific research and agency management everywhere needs to develop better communication, one that allows cats and dogs to coexist in harmony and truth,and with both respecting the public trust. What Do We Know? The District's past studies of physical oceanography have detailed ocean motion, mixing and sewage plume dispersal. Even waste field modeling has been carried out to determine the possibility, however small. of the plume reaching shore. The risk is not zero. and never was! To continually deny this basic truth does disservice to our more than adequate knowledge of Orange County coastal waters. In contrast to millions spent fruitlessly to identify land-based source(s), the Districts have already initiated less costly and more informative intensive coastal water surveys as Special Projects. The work consists of multiday measurements at a large grid of stations using automated water quality profilers. This finally implemented (by permit) a plan championed for nearly a decade by your former staff oceanographer/hydrologist. Some of the data gathered in this program is discussed below. It demonstrates the continuing need for experience and expertise in evaluating such data, and it has some implications for solving the great"mystery."This work is also labor intensive and subjects the present 2 dedicated staff and contractors to many perils. Per example, by automation with telemetry buoys and use of pump-equipped, "Tow-Yo" profiling equipment the very dangerous task of taking large water samples could be eliminated, and boat-size reduced. An alternative hypothesis to explain the"mystery" is currently under investigation at a cost of millions. This was outlined in OCSD's May 2001 "News Pipeline" and postulates that oceanographic processes(tides. internal waves. currents) bring the District's sewage plume close to shore where it may interact with the AES cooling water discharge at a depth of 10 m (30 feet). Here the AES discharge (250 mgd) may suck (intake) or entrain (outflow) bacteria into the surface waters offshore of Station 9 North. Winds and currents could quickly spread this contamination along Huntington Beach. Although this process could exacerbate the problem, it is neither necessary nor sufficient to account for other more widespread contamination findings. There may be something unique about the location, but this alone cannot explain the miles of closed beach in 1999. Larger scale processes must also play a role; I believe that the La-Nina was the key event. Importance of Large Scale Processes. Our knowledge of processes at different scales continues to increase with advances in methods(ocean buoys and sensors, satellites, computers. etc.). My expertise is not in these physical processes, but 1 believe they may hold the key to the"mystery." These processes include time scales of seconds to years, and space scales of local topographic featuresrto-61obal ocean-atmospheric coupling. And they are the greatest challenge to understanding what exactly happened in 1999, something which requires far more "data-mining" of historical records than expensive new research. Here I just mention a few that catch my fancy. The annual thermocline buildup -and breakdown- along with intermittent upwelling of deep, cold bottom waters is a constant in coastal shelf waters. Internal waves and tidal forces as well as "thermal channels" may also be a major factor in sewage dispersal that needs more study off Orange County. More dramatic changes are brought by EI-Nino (wet) and La-Nbta (dry) years, which tend to follow one-another and return with a 3 — 7 year periodicity. The recent success of El-Nifio prediction has become a poster-child for ocean model forecasting, greatly improved with the advent of automated ocean buoy telemetry systems and increasingly capable supercomputers. The El-Nif c, phenomenon has also become a darling of the press, although it has been especially well known since the late 1950s, when tropical fishes indicating warmer water incursions were found all the way from Monterey Bay to Alaska. 1 recall this event at the beginning of my boyhood interest in the sea while working at Pacific Grove's Marine Gardens. Now there are 1000+year historical records read from sediments, reef corals and tree rings, and one can quickly find seasonal indices of past decades and predictions of the future on a number of web sites. Beyond this scale is the even longer term"PDO" (Pacific Decadal Oscillation). This is a change in currents, every ten years or so, that influences large scale anomalies such as ENSO (The El-Niflo Southern Oscillation that is the result of a cyclic warming and cooling of the surface ocean of the central and eastern Pacific.). This brought colder waters, and larger trawl catches. in the 1970s monitoring and may be returning anew. If the recent shill lasts we can expect more winds, colder surface waters, and a weaker thermocline development that will shift the depth of the sewage plume toward the surface where wind action may force it quickly ashore as a surface slick. Finally, if real. global warming will stretch the boundary of our knowledge, but scientific debate has already led to predictions of fundamental changes in the system patterns that will influence outfall operations. My point is that these periodic and aperiodic events are not really surprises, but well known oceanographic phenomena that can be taken into account in ocean outfall practice. ; ' The District's 1999-2000 Monitoring Report. The District's recently published Ocean Monitoring Report(Year 2000)provides an informative look into what may have happened in the summer of 1999 that led directly to the widespread beach contamination. Unfortunately, this possibility seems to have been overlooked, instead giving rise to a potentially misleading statement of what the data portend to show. Similar effects appear in other years as well, but are less well documented. Nevertheless the process would be expected to continue to pose problems that can only be mitigated by addressing the issue in all its facets. Some time ago my Letter to the Los Angeles Times Editor suggested that it was time to "stop arguing and clean the beach." If I am now right about the 1999 water quality data this problem requires not more study but more treatment, effluent disinfection, a deeper outfall, or some combination thereof, in order to consistently meet the more rigorous,newly implemented standards for enterococcus. I also submit that although I have thought a great deal about this idea, it deserves further comparison and correlation with the existing body of historical data not yet available to me. I was struck by this idea that disastrous summer of 1999.wbeul saw a 59 degree F surface temperature recorded on the side of the Huntington Beach Lifeguard Tower. This was a sure sign of cold bottom water upwelling! As I continued walking to the end of the pier 1 worried about the thousands of swimmers and surfers enjoying the waters, while 1 faced a very stiff wind which was headed directly for the AES powerplant Comparing the District Statements to Mine. Although I respect each and every one of my former colleagues, all very dedicated and hard-working, still on your monitoring staff, 1 cannot agree with the conclusion of this Year's (1999-2000) Annual Report that there is no evidence for shoreline impingement and contamination by the District's sewage plume. It is clear to me an alternative hypothesis exists to explain the Huntington Beach "mystery." By combining the four days of excellent information depicted in attached Figures 2.2.2-1 (temperature) and 2.2.2.2(Salinity) I see a very clear pattern different from the authors. There is distinct reduction in surface temperature leading to a weakening of the thetmocline. This was caused by large scale upwelling that brought plume to the surface. Strong winds could have accomplished the same effect by deeply mixing the surface layer in the vicinity of the plume-body, but I have not carefully studied this data. (Not shown here is another figure in the report, 2.2.1-2 is a satellite image that clearly shows extensive coastal upwelling along the shoreline and remarks on a"cool surface water streamer"extending from the coast south of the study area on August 24. This could have destroyed the thermocline in its passage through the area. A final piece of the evidence I considered in this"mystery" was the high bacterial counts reaching from the Santa Ana River to 39 North during this same time-frame (Table M3). I believe that the excessive level and broad extent of fecal coliform and enterococcus contamination is strong confirmation of a smoking pipe-caused beach closure during the last week of August, 1999. 4 In the May 2001 "Pipeline News,"the District continues to take a position that a 301 (h) waiver is fully protective of the ocean and public health. Then they go a step beyond, stating "The closures are due to the presence of bacteria in the water, which is not believed to be associated with OCSD's discharge. OCSD has repeatedly performed wastewater analyses to demonstrate that the effluent plume is not reaching nearshore waters;..." In addition, "full secondary treatment would not provide any significant further protection of public, as secondary treatment is NOT a form of disinfection to rid the effluent of further bacteria." Both statements are false, based on the facts already in evidence. And, finally, "OCSD is not progressing towards full secondary at this time. If the decision were made today to proceed to full secondary, it would take 5-10 years for OCSD to begin operation." Protecting the Public. I believe the publics'safety must be assured sooner than the next decade. Possibly something can be done by advancing the schedule of modeling and remote sensing leading to better forecasting of possible ocean conditions adverse to swimmers. There may be operational changes(flow-leveling,short-term storage or emergency disinfection) that could help alleviate worst-case predictions. This should be justified immediately by a much more thoughtful analysis of existing data, strong expert inference regarding critically needed researchiand installation of high-tech automation of field sensors rather than bigger boats, endless surveys and more people. The District is now at a branch in the road s Yogi Berra once said: "T it!" Irwin Haydock. Ph.D. Fountain Valley Californi CC: OCSD Board of Directors Jan Vandersloot, M.D., Ocean Outfall Group Char Don Schulz SurtRiders. Huntington Beach Chapter Bob Caustin, Defend the Bay Michael Rozengurt,Ph.D./Hydrologist P. no December 19, 2001 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: V sa hy, Communications Manager SUBJECT: onymous Letters Regarding ICOR Residents of the cities of Grand Terrace and Colton, California were mailed an anonymous flyer(see attached) that presents inaccurate and inflammatory information regarding the proposed Inland Compost and Organic Recycling (ICOR) compost facility. From what we can gather, the letters arrived in mailboxes beginning on Friday, December 14. Approximately eight Colton area residents contacted the district to express their concerns about the proposed project. Staff is responding to these people via telephone, letters and requests to meet in person with interested residents and opinion leaders. In the letters and in conversations we explain our proposed operation, including the enclosure of the active composting process to ensure a facility free of odors and other nuisances. In addition to the outreach efforts from the biosolids and communications team members, ICOR representatives have talked to immediate neighbors of the proposed facility. This outreach will continue. In addition to this early and reactive outreach from the letter mailed to residents, should the board determine ICOR is a viable option for the beneficial reuse of biosolids, we will begin proactive and regular community outreach consistent with district practices. DO NOT BE SWAYED BY COLTON PROPAGANDA NO SLUDGE AND SEWAGE DUMPED IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODg r ! r i r ❑ Do not let Orange County Sanitation District, who can't dump waste in Orange County because of the vile and offensive odors, dump human waste bi-products (sludge) in our area. We already battle the offensive odors of the green waste facility of La Loma Hills. o Do not let them destroy the value of the homes in your Neighborhoods. ❑ Do not let them run out of the area the high school promised to our children and our community. ❑ Do not let them PRODUCE VILE AND OFFENSIVE ODORS that will blow daily into your area. The proposed site is very close to you at the corner of Riverside Avenue and Agua Massa Road. The final Orange County Sanitation District board meeting regarding this project will be held-Dec'bmber 19,2001. THIS IS OUR LAST CHANCEI!!! Please voice your opposition by calling and faxing to: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT To stop them in their tracks. Fax a letter to or call: Blake Anderson (General Manager),Layne Baroldi (Regulatory Specialist), or Karen Sterns (Public Affairs) Phone No: (714) 962-2411 • Fax: (714) 962-2591 P"ly SPNIM) °. OCSD answers the TOP 10 questions on... Composting in Your Community P� ?r•Rn illE EP�P P TIs Orange County going to be dumping human waste bi-products in my community? No,the Orange County Sanitation District is evaluating a proposal by an existing compost facility in Colton to mix treated biosolids with a mixture of organic greenwaste,wood and manure to produce a fertilizer that can used on parks,lawns and other green space. O What is the Inland Composting and Organic Recycling facility (ICOR)? ICOR is the new name for the Inland Empire Composting (IEC)facility currently located at the corner of Riverside and Agua Mansa Road in Colton. IEC has been successfully operated as a greenwaste composting facility since 1993. OWhat Is a composting facility? A composting facility takes a mixture organic materials such as greenwaste, wood, manure and biosolids and produces a material that can be used for fertilizer and land conditioning. The heat produced by the natural decomposition process treats the material to a product that can be used on home gardens, landscaping or agricultural lands. The heat from the process pasteurizes the material, making the end product safe for unrestricted marketing and distribution. Composting is a natural process that occurs every day in nature. The ICOR facility is different only in that composting occurs under controlled conditions, allowing the production of specific products. ® Will the facility produce offensive odors in my neighborhood? No, it is the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) not to participate or use composting operations that do not meet "Platinum Standard."This means that the composting, curing and storage portion of the facility must be enclosed and the area must be scrubbed or treated for odor. OCSD is committed to ensuring a good neighbor policy with the f - surrounding community. Composting will not be started - until all of the buildings are constructed and all of the biosolids composting can be done inside the enclosures on aerated floors. Enclosure is presently limited to the ' active and an accelerated cure phase. Finishing will occur - '- outsidetheenclosure, however this will occur in E�mp/e oren enclosed composting reallry. negatively aerated static piles to prevent odors. OWhy doesn't OCSD use some other technology to get rid of their waste? The district is committed to the beneficial reuse of biosolids. The OCSD management policy advocates the technologies that are sustainable, cost-effective, environmentally sensitive and publicly acceptable. The district strives to use multiple independent reuse alternatives for biosolids. These include composting, land application and chemical and alkaline treatments. ICOR is only one of the option s that OCSD is currently evaluating. Composting has withstood the test of time as being a reliable and sustainable option. More important, markets already exist for compost products. ...confined on other side OCSD/121901ACOR FAOP.Mr peg.l © Will ICOR decrease the value of my home? No, property values are related to property zoning. ICOR is in the Ague Manse Industrial and Recycling Zone in the city of Colton. The zoning is classified as M-1 and M-2, heavy industrial. The neighbor facilities to ICOR are industrial and municipal waste facilities. O Isn't it this land the same land that they were going to build the high school on? Where will the high school go? The proposed school site is located to the southeast of the ICOR facility. The facility will be regulated to ensure that there are no impacts to health, safety, and environment. If this site is chosen for the new high school and other concerns arise, ICOR and OCSD will make every effort to mitigate and address those concerns. ® Does ICOR have the regulatory approvals and permits it needs to operate? YES. ICOR has in place the needed entitlements and permits to operate. An Environmental Impact Report(EIR)was approved by the city of Colton and the State of California. An Conditional Use Permit for the design and use of the facility for composting of biosolids, green wastes, food wastes, manure and other non-hazardous organic materials was awarded by the city of Colton. For most development projects, California law, specifically the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), requires an EIR. The purpose of an EIR is threefold: . Analyze the environmental effects of a proposed project . Identify ways to reduce or avoid potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project . Identify and assess alternatives to the proposed action The environmental impact review process involves numerous public hearings and the development of several documents including: Notice of Preparation Draft Environmental Impact Report Formal Responses Final Environmental Impact Report Oq Now has ICOR notifed the community of the plans for the composting center? ICOR has met with staff from the city of Colton as well as local elected officials and handed out fliers to potentially impacted neighborhoods. Where can I find out more information about composting, OCSD and ICOR? More information can be found on the OCSD Website at WWWOCSD.com under "What's New." Karen Stearns, environmental specialist is also available to answer your questions at(714) 593-7461 or kstearns@ocsd.com. 005D/121901A00g FAge.c& page `OJXti 51XIIX I,XM Answersto questions about... _ Biosolids • What are biosolids? Biosolids are nutrient-rich organic materials resulting from the treatment of wastewater.When treated and processed, these residuals can be recycled and applied as fertilizer to improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth. • Why do we have biosolids? Thirty years ago, thousands of American cities dumped their raw sewage directly into the nation's rivers, lakes,and bays. Today's water treatment technology has made our water safer for recreation and seafood harvesting. Through regulation, local governments are now required to treat wastewater and make the decisions about what to do with the by-products their treatment process creates. Biosolids can be recycled, used as fertilizer, or buried in a landfill.At OCSD,we are com- mitted to 100 percent beneficial reuse of our biosolids. • What Is the difference between biosolids and sludge? Sewer sludge is made up of deposits collected after primary and secondary treatment. Biosolids are sewage sludge that has been carefully treated, monitored :. /. . and regulated. { • How are biosolids generated and processed? / \ The treatment of biosolids begins before the wastewater reaches the OCSD .,.,.'� sewage treatment plant. Pre-treatment regulations require those industrial facilities to pre-treat their wastewater and to remove pollutants before it is discharged into the sewer. OCSD's source control program monitors wastewater before it enters our plants. Once the wastewater reaches the plant, the sewage goes through physical, Orange County chemical and biological processes,which clean the wastewater and remove Sanitation District solids. The solids are further processed to reduce disease-causing organisms, such as certain bacteria,viruses, parasites and other organisms capable of Vision— carrying disease. To maintain warld-class • Why are biosolids recycled? leadership in wastenmer Aside from reuse, the other options for the disposal of biosolids contribute to the and water resource depletion of our natural resources. Landfills are quickly disappearing, more than management 1,200 of the existing 1,500 landfills in the United States have closed because of the increased cost of meeting environmental requirements and many more are running out of space. Keeping biosolids out of landfills and placing them where they can be beneficially used helps reduce the landfill shortage problem. It also provides a process for renewing the soil with nutrients and organic matter. Biosolids recycling is the best means of returning to the soil, nutrients and organic matter that were originally removed in agricultural products and con- sumed by the public. It is recycling a resource, lust like recycling newspapers or bottles. If the right safeguards are taken, biosolids use can be environmentally 10844 Ellis Avenue protective and even beneficial. Fountain r: r Valley, • Where are biosolids used? 18 Farmers and gardeners have been recycling biosolids for ages. Biosolids helps to for more information grow crops, fertilize gardens and parks and reclaim mining sites. Recycling of biosolids on land has increased over the past 20 years. Over 50 percent of all biosolids in the U.S. are managed through reuse. Land application of biosolids_b site I or visit our takes place in all 50 states. ...continued on other side oumoet2atM.WN&c.X. Ixdr aav r • Why apply biosolids on farmland? Biosolids add organic matter to the soil. This organic matter allows the soil to breathe and at the same time, hold more water and nutrients. The plant nutrients are released slowly, improving crop production.The result is better crops, less water runoff, less soil erosion,and more water conservation. Biosolids recycling on farmland is a safe, reliable, and a cost-effective method for managing biosolids. • How do biosolids help the soil and crops? Biosolids enrich the soil with essential nutrients and organic matter. Plants need a complex mixture of nutrients, soil, air, and water to grow well. Biosolids contain _ a full range of essential plant nutrients released slowly, as the plants need them during the growing season. The organic matter acts as a sponge for water, nutrients,and air where soil organisms can prosper and plant roots can better develop.This "sponge" reduces the possibility of leaching nutrients to the groundwater. • Is biosolids use profitable for farmers? OCSD's contractors apply and incorporate biosolids into appropriate fields at no cost to the farmer. The biosolids provide the farmer with an opportunity to improve the profitability of his or her farm through greater crop yields, better crop quality, reduced farm chemical use, lower tilling costs, and increased water retention. • Why is it unsafe to dump sludge in landfills and oceans, but safe to apply it on farmlands? It is safe to place properly treated biosolids in landfills and the ocean although it may not be consistent with current United States policy. Biosolids disposal in landfills occurs across the U.S. at the rate of 1.4 million dry tons per year. In California it is extremely difficult to utilize landfills for the disposal of biosolids as it competes with municipal or industrial solid waste for limited landfill space. Ocean disposal of biosolids was terminated by an act of Congress in 1989. The ocean disposal of biosolids ban came at a time when biosolids were of a lesser quality than found today and followed on the heels of some illegal dumping of medical wastes that occurred in the vicinity of an ocean disposal site. The reason Congress banned ocean dumping was not that biosolids were toxic to marine life. The Environmental Protection Agency noted there was little threat to the marine environment from biosolids. Congress properly decided that it made more sense and better policy to get biosolids out of the ocean and use the nutrients in biosolids safely and more productively to provide crop nutrients and to improve soil quality. For more Information please contact Sonia Wassgren, Public Information Coordinator, at (714) 593-7122 or log on to the Internet at www.ocsd.com. f r OCSD/061201 M.Widr CnnuaLedr pope 2 oJNtV SAM1111�0 Answersto questions about... O�frINC !NF EM�� a£W Biosolids ODORS • Do biosolids cause odors? Odors can result from the application of biosolids. Biosolids smell differently from cow, horse,and poultry manure and rural residents who have become accustomed to the smell of animal manure may notice the different odor of biosolids. The greatest odor release occurs as the biosolids are spread on the field. Odor emissions decrease significantly after the biosolids are tilled into the soil. Generally, with proper tillage, odors cannot be detected at all on a field a couple of days after application. -- - — • Where does this odor come from? Theodor from biosolids comes from the decomposition of organic material. If the biosolids are thoroughly digested at the wastewater plant, the odor is usually that of a moist soil. It can have a slight ammonia-like smell, or smell like a swamp.Wastewater treatment plants typically use an organic polymer additive in the process of dewatering bios(plids. t • Can I get sick from the odor? Odor does not cause disease, but can be irritating. Each,individual responds to odors differently. While no biosolids, • %;�``p'" operation can guarantee to be completely odor free all the time, OCSD strives 6 ` - to identify biosolids management practices at the plant,during transportation ' and land application that will keep odor occurrences to a minimum. • Do buffer zones get rid of odors for residences? Buffer'zones are used at biosolids land application sites as a precaution to reduce odor concerns with neighbors. Typical buffer distances are at leash 500 feet from residences. Well-managed application and quick tilling of the biosolids helps reduce the potential for odor. Other factors such as terrain, trees, wind direction, Orange County and weather conditions also have an influence on odor migration. Sanitation District GROUNDWATER 7b maintain world-class • Can biosolids applied to land contaminate groundwater? No. Research over the past 30-years has found that biosolids poses little risk to management groundwater quality. Biosolids present a much lesser threat to groundwater than animal manure or commercial fertilizers, because, unlike manure and commercial fertilizers, biosolids are strictly regulated and applied to land at rates that meet the fertilizer requirements of the crops. Over many decades thousands of acres of cropland have successfully received biosolids applications. In states where water quality monitoring wells adjacent to biosolids application sites are required, the water quality from these wells shows that there is no degradation of groundwater quality attributable to biosolids. • Will the metals in biosolids pollute the groundwater? 10844 _ _ No. Extensive research over many years has found that trace metals are Fountain Valley, CA strongly adsorbed or held to the soil particles and therefore do not travel 92708-7018 to the groundwater. for more information ...continued on other side or visit our web site 0CM/090901/8iowlids N,idrnl Cennrm.edr poBe I • Will pathogens end up in our groundwater? No. Pathogens in biosolids are extremely unlikely to find their way into groundwater. During biosolids treatment, the concentration of pathogens is significantly reduced and bacterial levels are usually found to be similar to those found `= in manure. This is especially true in hot,arid climates where pathogens are rapidly destroyed. Y • ;. • Will biosolids pollute the groundwater with trace organic _ compounds and pesticides? No. Trace organic compounds are rarely Buffer zone next to canal found in biosolids prior to land application. COMMERCIAL USE • Can biosolids be used safely on home gardens? Yes. Commercial biosolids are available for use in home gardens. These products have been used safely for over 65 years. Commercial biosolids products are safe f to use as fertilizers and soil amendments in lawn and garden applications. Biosolids compost has been used on the White House lawn, lawns at Mount Vernon, the Washington Monument,the Governor's Mansions in Maryland and New Mexico,the Constitution Gardens on the Washington, D. C. Mall, athletic . . • ` fields used by the Anaheim Angels, Los Angeles Dodgers, and at the Rose Bowl. Proper fence and posting In Albuquerque, New Mexico, biosolids compost is used on public parks, play Jjj fields, school playgrounds, and zoo exhibits. r Compost piles +s. OCSD/o)Wof/Rlosollds Re,idenl Conan,a. dr a.,l OM" rEbr1�� nswers to questions about... �``° °_rnr r..,•. Biosolids Monitoring • Are there regulations for land application of biosolids? Biosolids prior to land application must meet strict regulations and quality standards established by the federal government, Environmental Protection Agency, the state Regional Water Quality Control Board and local ordinances. The rules that govern the use and disposal of biosolids contain numerical limits for metals in biosolids, pathogen reduction standards, site restrictions,crop planting and harvesting restrictions and monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements for land applied biosolids as well as similar requirements for biosolids that are surface disposed or incinerated. • Where can 1 find out more about the regulations? The biosolids rule is described in the EPA publication,APlain English Guide to the " " - EPA Part 503 Bioso/ids Rule.This guide states and interprets the Part 503 rule for the general reader. This guide is also available in hard copy. In addition to the Plain English Guide, EPA has prepared A Guide to the Bioso/ids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule, which shows the many steps followed to develop the scientifically defensible and safe set of rules also available from EPA in hard copy (www.epa.gov/owm/bio/503pe4 • Are there rules about where biosolids can be applied? To determine whether biosolids can be applied to a particular farm site, the land applier performs an evaluation of the site's suitability. The evaluation examines ` water supplies, soil characteristics, slopes,vegetation, crop needs and the distances to surface and groundwater. OCSD staff then confirms or rejects the site as being appropriate for the District's biosolids. Nutrient management planning ensures that the appropriate quantity and quality of biosolids are land applied to the farmland.The biosolids application is specifi- Orange County cally calculated to match the nutrient uptake requirements of the particular crop. Sanitation District Nutrient management technicians work with the farm community to assure proper land application and nutrient control. Vision— There are different rules for different classes of biosolids. Class A biosolids leadership in trasinxreer contain no detectable levels of pathogens(microorganisms that cause disease.) These are the same materials you could buy at Home Depot. Class B biosolids are treated but may still contain detectable levels of pathogens. There are mnogernent buffer requirements, public access, and crop harvesting restrictions for Class B biosolids. • Are water monitoring wells needed at application sites? No. Research over the past 30-years that included the use of shallow wells, and deep wells, have found that biosolids poses little risk to groundwater quality. • What type of monitoring is provided? OCSD staff and land applica- tion contractors provide extensive monitoring and reporting on the biosolids land application program. Most monitoring is required through permits issued by the 10844 Ellis Avenue California Regional Water Quality Control Board to meet federal regulatory Valley, requirements. Table 1 shows the responsibilities for this monitoring. r Fountain r for more information or visit our web site ...continued on other side 06DN1W01/�iiololkl Mnnilarinp.<Er pnBe 1 Table 1 - monitoring and reporting requirements Required Records Responsibility for Monitoring& Reporting OCSD Applier 65 organic and inorganic parameters to ensure that biosolids are non-hazardous ( - Trace metal concentrations Pathogen reduction data and certification ' Vector attraction reduction data and certification • • Biosolids nutrient levels • Management practices description and certification �(• When required for compliance with Endangered Species Act, representative samples of background soils in the proposed application area analyzed for Fecal and Total Coliform, reported in MPN/g of total dry solids. When required for compliance with Endangered Species Act, the pre-application report shall include a species survey report signed by a qualified biologist,which identifies any of the endangered species that may be present. Site restriction description and certification(where Class B pathogen requirements we met) Representative samples of background soils from each soil type in the proposed application area analyzed for pH. EPA 40 CFR w Field characterization,including:proposed crops,tillage Part 503 practices,run on/runoff controls and locations,biosolids �•�"'�" staging locations,distance to any nearby surface water, site location,site map,and buffer zones. • How long and how often will the monitoring last? Monitoring at the land application site will begin several months prior to biosolids land i application in order to gain permit approval. During the permit approval process, _ soil samples are tested and the results determine how many biosolids are • l ) applied. Prior to land application the suitability of sites and hauling routes are determined. During biosolids land application, monitoring at the site will occur at least monthly and perhaps more frequently. • Do you sample and monitor biosolids? Biosolids and soil at the -='.--�--t - land application site are frequently monitored to assure compliance with federal, state, and local requirements. OCSD monitors and tests sewage before it enters the treatment plant,as it passes through the treatment systems,and as biosolids are prepared for land application. The testing frequency for biosolids goes beyond the regulatory minimums. OCSD must certify to the U.S. Environmental Protection :•_"� _- Agency(EPA)that before the biosolids leave the treatment plant they meet all the regulatory standards and quality standards for land application. At the land application site, the contractors transporting and applying biosolids must certify that the application meets all regulatory standards.The Clean Water Act allows criminal and civil penalties for not meeting the standards. � • Who tests the biosolids? Biosolids are tested by the state-certified OCSD laboratory and by state-certified contract laboratories. Certificationof these laboratories and personnel is achieved through the California Department i of Health Services. Certification is obtained after a rigorous and costly process. ♦-•�� •4 : Only USEPA-approved methods are allowed and the results are accessible to the public. 06DPo]09m/aieWds Meniron,p.rdr wa.2 °,y,V SPMi II I,O _ . nswer �-- to questions about... e 1`° Biosolids - Pathogens and Safety Concerns y w' - • What are pathogens? Pathogens are microorganisms that cause disease. Some pathogens are associated with sewage and biosolids. Pathogens of significance include bacteria,viruses, protozoa, and helminths. ,..» Ina non-scientific context, pathogens are germs.They are very small organisms _�.. and are invisible to the human eye. Bacteria are everywhere in our environment and life. Some bacteria are critically important to beneficial activities,while other bacteria will cause human disease if a person is susceptible and comes in contact in sufficient numbers.A well- ' - known bacterium is Salmonella, which is found in chickens. Viruses are distinctly different from other pathogens because they are unable to 1 reproduce outside the Wing cell they infect, although they will remain dangerous for a time. Viruses are responsible for numerous human diseases including flu. Protozoa are sometimes found in Qrinking water, raw or under-cooked food or on contaminated food preparation surfaces. Helminths are usually in the form of tapeworms and roundworms, organisms frequently found in dogs, cats, and rats. Where do pathogens come from? Pathogens live in all humans, domestic animals, livestock, and wildlife. Germs are present in animal and human waste. Human waste is collected in sewers or septic tanks in order to treat and disinfect it at treatment plants. Other germs may enter lakes and streams through urban stormwater ruhoff. Orange County • How are we protected from pathogens? Sanitation Pathogenic microorganisms generally do not survive well outside of the body. District Germs are vulnerable and will die when exposed to other microorganisms, treatment systems, disinfecting chemicals(e.g. acids or bleaches), heat, light, or dryness. To maintain world-clans • Are there pathogens in biosolids? Yes because biosolids are a and tsver resource product of the wastewater treatment process. Approximately 99 percent of the management pathogens are destroyed during the collection and treatment of wastewater, and most of the remainder through the solids treatment process. Most pathogens cannot multiply outside of living hosts. For example,the AIDS virus is transferred only through intimate body contact with transfer of body fluids and the virus has never been found to survive the wastewater treatment process. • How are biosolids treated to kill pathogens? The presence of pathogens in wastewater and the biosolids resulting from wastewater treatment requires treatment of these solids to reduce any remaining pathogens to a safe level before reuse. Municipal wastewater treatment includes a wide variety of processes to kill germs.The resulting products(biosolids)are then safely reused 10844 Ellis Avenue as organic fertilizer. Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Depending on the amount of treatment biosolids receive, the resulting products are classified as either Class A or Class B biosolids. Class A biosolids are treated for more information to a greater degree than Class B biosolids and are safe for direct human contact. or visit our web site ...continued on other side OCSO/070901/aimolidr Poihaeev.pdr paps 1 _ For example, Class A biosolids are found in fertilizers sold in garden and home improvement stores and are safe to touch and use in gardens. Class B biosolids are treated to a safe level, but do require compliance with land and crop use restrictions. Commonly used treatment methods include: • Digestion: anaerobic,without oxygen, or aerobic in the presence of oxygen, breakdown of wastewater solids at elevated temperatures that kill pathogens. . • Composting: aerobic breakdown of wastewater solids at elevated temperatures that kill pathogens. Composting processes frequently combine biosolids with wood chips,yard trimmings, and other organic matter. • Heat drying: use of heat to dry the biosolids(elevated temperatures and lack of moisture effectively destroy pathogens). • Chemical Stabilization: use of alkaline(lime)or other chemicals to create an environment that destroy pathogens. • Will I or my animals get sick if 1 use biosolids on my land? No. Land application of biosolids requires strict safety standards and best management practices that protect public health and the environment. In fact, you probably have been using biosolids products for years, because they are commonly found in nurseries and home improvement stores nationwide. • Are biosolids free from hazardous toxins? OCSD biosolids meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's most stringent regulations for pollutant concentrations. Controlling industrial discharges before they enter the r sewer assures that biosolids generated at our wastewater treatment facilities are acceptable for recycling as a fertilizer or soil conditioner. Our industrial pretreat- ment program regulates toxins generated by industry. The program restricts 1 industries from discharging major pollutants into the wastewater collection system,and includes routine unannounced inspections as well as regular monitoring programs by our inspectors. • What does the scientific evidence show about biosolids? No other agricultural practice or product has been subjected to such rigorous scientific assessment and risk evaluation as biosolids recycling. Scientific opinion about biosolids has evolved over the past four decades, as increasing data --� becomes available from long-term studies. Everything learned reinforces the safety and effectiveness of biosolids recycling. • Have farmers, their families, and their crops been tested? Yes, a five-year comprehensive study by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio State University, Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, and the Ohio Department of Health conducted a health effects study of 47 farms using biosolids compared with 46 farms not using biosolids. It included health questionnaire surveys and blood testing of the participating families who live on farms.The study demonstrated that exposure to land applied biosolids has no negative health effects. 1 f r 0CM/070901/11ie,.1idr Nlh,..n .,dr p,,2 l,C�v�a� ✓-�.. ha. �d� ATTACHh1ENT 2 f RESPONSE TO COMMENTS INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD)is planning to replace a sanitary sewer pump station within 10 Street in the city of Newport Beach. The Rehabilitation of the 146 Street Pump Station, Newport Beach, Initial Smdy/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (State Clearinghouse#2001111105) was prepared by OCSD and circulated for a 30-day public review period from November 15 to December 14, 2001. This Response to Comments document has been prepared to address comments received on the IS/MND pursuant to Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS The following comments on the project were received during the IS/MND review period: 1) Telephone conversation dazed November 19, 2001, from Emil Matyas with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 2) Telephone conversation dated November 20, 2001, from Larry Seigel with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 3) Letter from the Gas Company, dated November 20, 2001, signed by Kris V. Keas 4) Letter from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse,dated November 21, 2001 5) Letter from the California Department of Transportation, District 12, dated November 27, 2001, signed by Robert F. Joseph_ 6) Telephone conversation dated November 29, 2001 from Jim Cantwell with Angie Anderson of OCSD Engineering Staff. Copies of these letters and records of the telephone conversations are attached to this document. Responses to the comments are provided below. None of the comments received would alter the text or conclusions of the IS/MND or result in any change in the proposed mitigation measures. aelYMth .or0e IC•$vent lump w,m.N�amm I Einimmmmul&c Aswc w1w smtly'Mi,ipw Ne ive nah,eiw a RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1) Telephone Record, Emil Matyas, November 19, 2001 Comment: Mr. Maryas inquired as to the height of the proposed building. Response: The height of the support building would be 20 feet above grade to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. The architecture of the building would integrate with the surrounding area. 2) Telephone Record, Larry Siegel, November 20, 2001 Comment: Mr. Siegel inquired as to the effects of the project on local traffic. Response: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa as the new station is to replace an existing station. The actual construction activities would disrupt traffic as described in the IS/MND for approximately 2 months by closure of one lane of traffic in each direction. At least one lane of traffic in both directions will be kept open at all times during construction. The street will be restored to its original appearance. 3) The Gas Company Comment: The comment letter states that The Gas Company has facilities in the area that could be altered without significant effect on the environment. Response: No response is necessary. - 4) Governor's Office of Planning and Research Comment: The letter acknowledges receipt of the IS/MND and provides a distribution list. Response: No response is necessary. 5) California Department of Transportation Comment: The comment letter states that Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no comments on the project. Response: No response is necessary. 6) Telephone Record, Jim Cantwell, November 29, 2001 RcluhiI witon of We I Slrcn Pomp saiion,Newport Beach 2 pmimnmcnml Sci.M.W. Inirial Swdy/mki,r Negai-Declaraion Comment: Mr. Cantwell requested a copy of the IS/MND. Response: A copy of the IS/MND was sent to Mr. Cantwell as requested. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the need for the project and why the proposed building would be 20-feet high. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the 10 Street Pump Station has deteriorated and is in need of repairs to avoid creating sewage spills in the area. The OCSD conducted an assessment of the pump station and determined that refurbishing the existing vault beneath le Street would not be feasible. As a result, a nearby vacant lot property was selected to house a replacement pump station. The new pump station will not increase the capacity of the sewer line. The building height is necessary to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the owner of the property and the purchase price. Response: The comment does not pose a question regarding potential environmental effects of the project subject to CEQA review. No response is necessary. OCSD negotiations have not been finalized. Once the District decides on a purchase price, the information requested will be available as part of the public record. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asked what the contingency would be if the property were not available. Response: The project description includes purchasing the property. No other alternative sites or contingencies have been developed. If the property is not available, OCSD would redesign the project and would be subject to additional CEQA review. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asks what changes could be made to the architectural design of the proposed building. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the architectural design of the proposed building will integrate with the surrounding structures. The building will be 20 feet high, encompassing approximately 576 square feet. The project will include low water landscaping maintained by OCSD. A set of building design drawings will be submitted to the city of Newport Beach. OCSD will review and incorporate the City's comments where feasible. Rdnpillu,i.of Jae 11^S11u1 Pomp S.Im.Nlwp aoN } Envirorvnenul5ci<x<As<ocm. Wml&Wy1Mkip¢0 N,,—Dchn�iun RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(1) Date: November 19, 2001 Initiator: Emil Matyas, Property Owner 1621 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 1eStreet Pump Station Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Matyas inquired as to the why the pump station's above grade facility would be 20 feet tall. Mr. Cassidy responded, as to the reason for the 20-foot height, as follows: The District's standard is to place the floor of a new outlying pump station at least one foot above the base flood plane for the area, thus placing the building's floor two feet above the existing finish grade. The building's interior is to at least 12 feet tall due to the height of the electrical equipment, electrical conduits, ventilation ducts and lighting. One foot is allowed for the thickness of the roof. A five-foot parapet wall above the roof is planned to hide the HVAC equipment. Thus the height is to total 20 feet. Mr. Cassidy also noted that building's architecture is to integrate with the surrounding area. There is the three-story residential building to the east and the single story Edison substation building to the west. RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(2) Date: November 20, 2001 Initiator: Larry Siegel West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the le Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Siegel inquired as to what effects would the project have on traffic on Balboa Blvd. over the 18-month construction schedule. Mr. Cassidy noted the following: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa Blvd as the new station is to replace an existing station. The 18-month schedule covers from the time the District awards the construction contract to the time the District accepts the new station as complete. Actual construction in the field would be less with work in the street to be approximately 2 months. The work in the street is to consist of extending the existing gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd from the existing station to the new site and demolishing the existing station. The extension of the gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd. is expected to take only four weeks to complete. The demolition of the existing station to five feet below finish grade is also expected to take only four weeks. One lane of traffic in each direction will be kept open at all times during the work conducted in the street. Mr. Cassidy also noted that the median above the existing station is to be restored to its current appearance (minus the staircase down to the pump station) or modified to add additional parking. The District is to request of the city which option is desired. V _ . . - somhmn Cmllornla Goa Co."., Orange Coast Raglan The _.� � ' . . .: �^ Poaa x3334 1 Gas Anaheim CA 928039334 company. A Sempra Energy,cgmpmy -- November 20, 2001 O.C. Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue _ Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Jim Herberg Subject: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of 14th Street Pump Station in Newport Beach This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas facilities within the service area of the project could be altered or abandoned as necessary without any significant impact on the environment. Information regarding construction particulars and any costs associated with initiating service may be obtained by contacting the Planning Associate for your area, Dave Baldwin at(714) 634-3267. Sincerely, Q!� Kris V. Kees Technical Supervisor Orange Coast Region KM. miwpde..duc - may f .." i STATE OF CALIFORNIA � m` GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH I Gray Davis State Clearinghouse Sceven A. Nissen GOVERNOR DIRECrOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT DATE: November 21,2001 TO: James D. Heiberg — Orange County Sanitation District - 10844 Ellis Avenue - Fountain Valley, CA 92708 -;-; RE: Rehabilitation of thel4th Street Pump Station,Newport Beach - SCH#: 2001111105 This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Date: November 15, 2001 Review End Date: December 14, 2001 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: California Coastal Commission Caltrans,District 12 Department of Fish and Game,Region 5 Department of Health Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources Native American Heritage Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Program The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the State Clearinghouse review process. 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 916-44 5 46 13 FAX 916-323-3018 WWW.OPR-C GOWCLEARINGHOUSE.HTML 9 STATE OF CAUFORNIA—SUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY OAVIS Go v DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3337 V110own 0."Suite 360 Im..CA.92612-8894 November 27, 2001 Mr. Jim Herberg File: IGR/CEQA Engineering Manager SCH* None Orange County Sanitation District Log #: 990 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Rehabilitation of 141h Street Pump Station Dear Mr. Herberg, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated November 13, 2001 on the Rehabilitation of 10 Street Pump Station project. The Orange County Sanitation District proposes to construct a new pump station facility on 1514 West Balboa Boulevard to replace an existing station (to be decommissioned) located at the intersection of West Balboa and 10 street on the Balboa Peninsula in the City of Newport Beach. Caltrans District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and has no comments at this time. However, in the event of any activity in Caltrans right way an encroachment permit is required. Applicants are required to plan for sufficient permit processing time, which may include engineering studies and environmental documentation. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and other future developments, which could potentially impact our transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please do not hesitate to call Maryam Molavi at(949) 724-2267. Si�jce ely, Robert F. Joseph, Chie IGR/Community Planning Branch c: Ron Helgeson, HO IGR/Community Planning RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(3) Date: November 29, 2001 Initiator: Jim Cantwell 1511 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA 92663 Respondent: Angie Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the following: Why is project needed?Are there capacity issues; if so, is the pipeline or pump station causing the problem? Why is the proposed building height so high? What is the name of the person who currently owns the property? What is the purchase price for the vacant lot? What happens if OCSD is unable to purchase the lot? What influence does the project manager have on the architectural design of the building?Are you able to make changes? Ms. Anderson noted that he would have to speak directly to the Project Manager (William Cassidy) for answers to detail questions. Ms. Anderson also informed Mr. Cantwell that Mr. Cassidy would return his call. (Mr. Cassidy returned Mr. Cantwell's call twice later that day and again on December V, reaching only Mr. Cantwell's answering machine. Mr. Cassidy requested a return call, leaving his direct number.) Mr. Cantwell also request a copy of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ms. Anderson mailed a copy as request. ATTACMIENT 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD) is planning to replace a sanitary sewer pump station within 14"Street in the city of Newport Beach. The Rehabilitation of the 14"Street Pump Station, Newport Beach, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (State Clearinghouse#2001111105) was prepared by OCSD and circulated for a 30-day public review period from November 15 to December 14, 2001. This Response to Comments document has been prepared to address comments received on the IS/MND pursuant to Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS The following comments on the project were received during the IS/MND review period: 1) Telephone conversation dated November 19, 2001, from Emil Matyas with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 2) Telephone conversation dated November 20, 2001, from Larry Seigel with William Cassidy of OCSD Engineering Staff. 3) Letter from the Gas Company, dated November 20, 2001, signed by Kris V. Keas 4) Letter from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, dated November 21, 2001 5) Letter from the California Department of Transportation, District 12, dated November 27, 2001, signed by Robert F. Joseph 6) Telephone conversation dated November 29, 2001 from Jim Cantwell with Angie Anderson of OCSD Engineering Staff. Copies of these letters and records of the telephone conversations are attached to this document. Responses to the comments are provided below. None of the comments received would alter the text or conclusions of the IS/MND or result in any change in the proposed mitigation measures. Rchaeilimlon of"e IA•Slm a Pomp SuJon,Newport Beach I Enrironmemal Sciuue Aaeclues Ini,ial SwdyNhiguce Ngaivc D.I..6 n RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1) Telephone Record, Emil Matyas, November 19, 2001 Comment: Mr. Matyas inquired as to the height of the proposed building. Response: The height of the support building would be 20 feet above grade to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. The architecture of the building would integrate with the surrounding area. 2) Telephone Record, Larry Siegel, November 20, 2001 Comment: Mr. Siegel inquired as to the effects of the project on local traffic. Response: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa as the new station is to replace an existing station. The actual construction activities would disrupt traffic as described in the IS/MND for approximately 2 months by closure of one lane of traffic in each direction. At least one lane of traffic in both directions will be kept open at all times during construction. The street will be restored to its original appearance. 3) The Gas Company Comment: The comment letter states that The Gas Company has facilities in the area that could be altered without significant effect on the environment. Response: No response is necessary. 4) Governor's Office of Planning and Research Comment: The letter acknowledges receipt of the IS/MND and provides a distribution list. Response: No response is necessary. S) California Department of Transportation Comment: The comment letter states that Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no comments on the project. Response: No response is necessary. 07 Telephone Record, Jim Cantwell, November 29, 2001 RC biIiulwn of the I Slrtn Pump sulion.Ne n B=h 2 En,!..ml$6.M.hia Initial siWY/Mili,cd N'.tm fmdvaion Comment: Mr. Cantwell requested a copy of the IS/MND. Response: A copy of the IS/MND was sent to Mr. Cantwell as requested. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the need for the project and why the proposed building would be 20-feet high. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the 10 Street Pump Station has deteriorated and is in need of repairs to avoid creating sewage spills in the area. The OCSD conducted an assessment of the pump station and determined that refurbishing the existing vault beneath 14'Street would not be feasible. As a result, a nearby vacant lot property was selected to house a replacement pump station. The new pump station will not increase the capacity of the sewer line. The building height is necessary to accommodate the pumping equipment and air handling equipment. Comment: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the owner of the property and the purchase price. Response: The comment does not pose a question regarding potential environmental effects of the project subject to CEQA review. No response is necessary. OCSD negotiations have not been finalized. Once the District decides on a purchase price, the information requested will be available as part of the public record. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asked what the contingency would be if the property were not available. Response: The project description includes purchasing the property. No other alternative sites or contingencies have been developed. If the property is not available, OCSD would redesign the project and would be subject to additional CEQA review. Comment: Mr. Cantwell asks what changes could be made to the architectural design of the proposed building. Response: As discussed in the IS/MND, the architectural design of the proposed building will integrate with the surrounding structures. The building will be 20 feet high, encompassing approximately 576 square feet. The project will include low water landscaping maintained by OCSD. A set of building design drawings will be submitted to the city of Newport Beach. OCSD will review and incorporate the City's comments where feasible. Rawlimion of the 10 Stnn Pomp Station,Newpon such 3 Eovlee WOL Seienee Aefeeidtes Itddal SmdyNitlgmM NoSmiyc Dulaudon RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(1) Date: November 19, 2001 Initiator: Emil Matyas, Property Owner 1621 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Matyas inquired as to the why the pump station's above grade facility would be 20 feet tall. Mr. Cassidy responded, as to the reason for the 20-foot height, as follows: The District's standard is to place the floor of a new outlying pump station at least one foot above the base flood plane for the area, thus placing the building's floor two feet above the existing finish grade. The building's interior is to at least 12 feet tall due to the height of the electrical equipment, electrical conduits, ventilation ducts and lighting. One foot is allowed for the thickness of the roof. A five-foot parapet wall above the roof is planned to hide the HVAC equipment. Thus the height is to total 20 feet. Mr. Cassidy also noted that building's architecture is to integrate with the surrounding area. There is the three-story residential building to the east and the single story Edison substation building to the west. RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION -(2) Date: November 20, 2001 Initiator: Larry Siegel West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA92663 Respondent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District (District) 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 140 Street Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Siegel inquired as to what effects would the project have on traffic on Balboa Blvd. over the 18-month construction schedule. Mr. Cassidy noted the following: The project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic on Balboa Blvd as the new station is to replace an existing station. The 18-month schedule covers from the time the District awards the construction contract to the time the District accepts the new station as complete. Actual construction in the field would be less with work in the street to be approximately 2 months. The work in the street is to consist of extending the existing gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd from the existing station to the new site and demolishing the existing station. The extension of the gravity sewer in Balboa Blvd. is expected to take only four weeks to complete. The demolition of the existing station to five feet below finish grade is also expected to take only four weeks. One lane of traffic in each direction will be kept open at all times during the work conducted in the street. Mr. Cassidy also noted that the median above the existing station is to be restored to its current appearance (minus the staircase down to the pump station) or modified to add additional parking. The District is to request of the city which option is desired. j Southern California Gas Company The _ GMWe Coast Rouilon IGas 79 p0 Boo 33U Company-C Anaheim.CA 92803 3334 A OeSempra Energy company November 20, 2001 O.C. Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue _ Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention: Jim Herberg Subject: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of 14th Street Pump Station in Newport Beach This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas facilities within the service area of the project could be altered or abandoned as necessary without any significant impact on the environment. Information regarding construction particulars and any costs associated with initiating service may be obtained by contacting the Planning Associate for your area, Dave Baldwin at (714) 634-3267. Sincerely, Kris V. Keas Technical Supervisor Orange Coast Region KVK/non miusagda.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ® GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH Gray Davis State Clearinghouse Steven A. Nissen GOVERNOR DIRECTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT DATE: November 21, 2001 TO: James D. Herberg -- Orange County Sanitation District - - - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 RE: Rehabilitation of thel4th Street Pump Station,Newport Beach - SCH#: 2001111105 This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Date: November 15,2001 Review End Date: December 14, 2001 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: California Coastal Commission Caltrans,District 12 Department of Fish and Game,Region 5 Department of Health Services Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources Native American Heritage Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission State Water Resources Control Board,Clean Water Program The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the State Clearinghouse review process. 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACK ENTO. CALIFORNIA 95812.3044 916-4454613 FAX 916323-3018 WWW.OPRCA.GOVICLEARINGHOUSE- TML .STATE OF CAUFORNIA—BUSINESS.TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS.Govemc DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3337 M&halsw Oma Suite 380 _ Irvine.GA.92612-8894 November 27, 2001 Mr. Jim Herberg File: IGR/CEQA Engineering Manager SCH#: None Orange County Sanitation District Log #: 990 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Rehabilitation of 14" Street Pump Station Dear Mr. Herberg, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated November 13, 2001 on the Rehabilitation of 14"' Street Pump Station project. The Orange County Sanitation District proposes to construct a new pump station facility on 1514 West Balboa Boulevard to replace an existing station (to be decommissioned) located at the intersection of West Balboa and 14" street on the Balboa Peninsula in the City of Newport Beach. Caltrens District 12 status is a reviewing agency on this project and has no comments at this time. However, in the event of any activity in Caltrans right way an encroachment permit is required. Applicants are required to plan for sufficient permit processing time, which may include engineering studies and environmental documentation. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and other future developments, which could potentially impact our transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please do not hesitate to call Maryann Molavi at (949) 724-2267. Si cee/ly, "�lhlhie Robert F. f IGR/Community Planning Branch c: Ron Helgeson, HQ IGR/Community Planning RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSION - (3) Date: November 29, 2001 Initiator: Jim Cantwell 1511 West Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA 92663 Respondent: Angie Anderson, Orange County Sanitation District (District) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Summary of Conversion: Mr. Cantwell inquired as to the following: Why is project needed?Are there capacity issues; if so, is the pipeline or pump station causing the problem? Why is the proposed building height so high? What is the name of the person who currently owns the property? What is the purchase price for the vacant lot? What happens if OCSD is unable to purchase the lot? What influence does the project manager have on the architectural design of the building?Are you able to make changes? Ms. Anderson noted that he would have to speak directly to the Project Manager (William Cassidy)for answers to detail questions. Ms. Anderson also informed Mr. Cantwell that Mr. Cassidy would return his call. (Mr. Cassidy returned Mr. Cantwell's call twice later that day and again on December 310, reaching only Mr. Cantwell's answering machine. Mr. Cassidy requested a return call, leaving his direct number.) Mr. Cantwell also request a copy of the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ms. Anderson mailed a copy as request. I I Effluent Viruses Year 2020 Scenario Comparisons 50% Secondary with GWR ' 50 /o Secondary without GWR E a � 1 p L Full Secondary w GWR i I L) Full Secondary w/o GWR Permit Limits w GWR Permit Limits w/o GWR 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 PFU/10 ml - ,� 95�/ SIRATEG/c ;5'L/FN J°F°SNZ'jX p 1 Huntington Beach Tomorrow PO Box 865 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 December 11,2001 Dear OCSD Board Member RE: Opposition to 301(h)Waiver As you know Huntington Beach Tomorrow is a large community based advocacy group that looks out for the interest of our members,our citizens and our city. We are dedicated to improve Huntington Beach for today and tomorrow.The issue surrounding the Orange County Sanitation District operations and specifically the 301 (h)Waiver to the Clean Water Act has caused great concern among our citizens and members. Huntington Beach is also known as Surf City.The image of a sewage treatment plant dumping millions of gallons of not fully treated sewage off out coast is bad for the health of our citizens, our children,our image,our visitors and our local economy.The dumping has very important consequences to the many swimmers who can possibly be exposed to the bacteria and viruses from 2.4 million people.These pathogens can possibly cause eye,ear,nose and throat infections, vomiting and diarthea. The OCSD has failed to offer any proof that the sewage dumping is logical or safe. People come from around Southern California,the nation and the world to enjoy the beautiful beaches of Huntington Beach.The beach and ocean closures believed to be associated with the OCSD sewage dumping are bad for our economy and could have significant negative financial impacts on our tourist revenue,hotel residency tax,and could diminish the attraction of our new resort. The inadequately treated sewage may also be banning the ecology of the ocean,and causing fish liver lesions,invertebrate changes,and unknown effects to mammals such as dolphins and whales migrating up and down the coast.The health of our ocean is very important to our general community,our children,as well as our many sport and recreational fishermen. Therefore,Huntington Beach Tomorrow strongly opposes the continued use of the 301 (h) Waiver and urges the OCSD board members to vote against pursuing further request for the 301 (h)Waiver to the 1972 Clean Water Act. Additionally, it is unfair for the community and citizens of Huntington Beach to continue to tolerate the air and water pollution,in addition to the smell,the bad image the sewage treatment plant has brought to our community.The cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach house the sewage treatment plants that process sewage from many inland cities. Furthermore we receive no tax revenue or benefits from the operations.In fact,we believe the facilities have a very large negative impact on the community and specifically the neighborhoods surrounding the facilities. Therefore, if any new facilities need to be built,we strongly encourage the Board Members and General Manager to look for alternate locations for additional sewage treatment facilities. We encourage the OCSD to investigate the distribution of sewage treatment facilities and processing to other areas in the district to fairly share the burden. Sincerely, Dave Sullivan President, Huntington Beach Tomorrow ORANGE COUNTY PROGRAM DATES r, January 13 - 15, 2002 ti Lake Arrowhead UCLA Conference Center SYMPOSIUM An engaging leadership in nmrsion ex- pa*nwdmknedwith oneptaprse in mind— bt i ng the yforCotm4wlde leadership. . . . . . . • . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Symposium '7 do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other peopfe or Objectives any other generation.. ?he energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor wiQfight our country andar" The Orange County Leadership Symposium is who serve it—and the grow from that fire not designed to cover specific issues. Rather, it is can truly fight the warfd' designed to link you with other elected leaders to ponder, exchange ideas, and design action beyond -John Fitzgerald Kennedy the institutional boundaries of our respective agencies. Together we will identify collective aspi- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • rations and the realities facing the communities we lead For Orange County to achieve its greatest Symposium potential, we nmrst overcome the disconnected- ness that has been inherent in our institutions. Facilitators The 2'A days will include: Eric Klein. Precedent and founder • Interactive leadership exercises and de- of Dhanna Consulting and co- briefing work. Participants will be asked to o R founder of The Leadership Curie, draw analogies between the exercises and is an expert on personal and or- their own knowledge and experiences. - ganizitional renewal and leader - • Analysis and discussion of "case studies" ship. He has worked in senior designed by the Kennedy School of Gov- marugernent for two Fortune 500 emment looking at decision-making,styles companies and been an organiza- of leadership,and conflict resolution. tional development consultant for over 15 years. As the author of the best selling book Auak-mg • Provocative lectures by experts in Local Cbrpm& W,� Eric works with executives who Govemn'tett and Political Science want to create high performance, high fulfillment organizations. The program utilizes a proven design used in both public and private sector leadership development. Marty Linsky is a lecturer in public policy and the Director of Harvard's Kennedy School of Govern- • Understand why governmental perform- ment Executive Program for State and Local Gov- ance and individual effectiventess is de- emment Senior Officials. Marty has been a jour- pendent upon leadership capacity. nalist, a lawyer,and a politician, having served as a • Explore the reasons why leadership is risky member and Assistant Minority Leader of the and therefore doesn't happen as often as Massachusetts House of Representatives. He is the author of several books, the most recant being necessary. StaWg Alice A Le..rbsbp Suntinl Kit (coauthored • Add creativity and diversity of thought and with Ronald Heifetz). perceptions to the decision nuking prcc- ess. Mark Maier is Associate Professor and founding Chan of the Organizational Leadership Program at • Recognize and further develop your use of Chapman University. The program won the Out- intuition and imagination to complement standing Leadership Program Award in 1998. rational and analytical modes of drinking Mark is also President of Leadership Development and decision-making. Associates, a group of Chapman-affiliated person- nel who have joined together to broader the prac- • Develop a vision of your legacy. tice of servant-leadership in private, public, and non-profit organizations. The 2002 Leading our ORANGE COUNTY Communities LEADERSHIP SYMPOSIUM What wflC your fegacy be? ?lie Executive Directors o Orange County leaders have stewardship over one f eight of the most productive and energetic economies regianafagencies... in the country—maybe the world With economic • Chip Prather—Chief, Orange County Fire vitality comes a greater shared responsibility. Authority Consider the following statistics. In the next two • Blake Anderson—General Manager, demo O s population will increase Orange County Sanitation District City' • Janet M. Huston—Executive Director, f nearly of the0. Older neighborhoods will bear League of California Cities-Orange County brunt of the population growth, straining the • Wall Ktuetzen—Executive Director, rapacity O aging public facilities, roads, and Y schools. Orange County creates three jobs for Transportation Corridor Agencies every new house budt—a tread that will continue • Dare M. Smith—Executive Officer, to drive up home values, thereby affecting work Orange County Local Agency Formation force housing needed to support our vibrant and Commission diverse business community. • Art Leahy—General Manager, Orange County Transportation Authority At a time when cipme ced leadership is a rocs- • Michael Sd tunicher—CEO, County of sity, term limits force accomplished and seasoned Orange elected officials from office. There is increasing • Mike Pamess--President, Orange County pressure to sharpen the learning curve of mespeni- City Managers'Association enced officals to respond to the demands of an ...invite you, the elected region! ever more complex metropolitan environment Ceadersh p of Orange County to an We stand on a precipice of great opportunity.This engaging leadership devefopment opportunity cells for leadership that will challenge experf¢nce. us to face problems for which there are no simple, Painless solutions. As elected officials, you have dedicated yourselves to tackling the infinite dnallenges created by The Orange County Leadership Symposium a Orange County's rapidly evolving urban landscape means by which we as leaders can develop the vi- You are visionaries—you see these dnallanges as Sion, collaboration, and planning skills needed to oppomutities. lead our communities forward into the new mil- lennium When we seize this opportunity, the re- The 2002 Orange County Leadership Symposium salts of our collective efforts will be our legacy to was designed specifically for you, Orange County's the Orange County of the future local government officials. The event promises to • • • • • • • • • • • • • • be euegytharged, inspirational, and thought- provoking. It will challenge you to question If you do not choose to do it ; assumptions, seek new decision-making methods, in feadersh p time upfront, and create new concepts of success. By diversifying thought and fostering collaboration, you [for it in crisis management the symposium will cultivate Countywide ; time down the road" leadership strategies,values,vision,and legacies. • - Stephen Covey The UCLA Registration Facility lnfornmtion Nestled among the trees up 5,000 feet in the San The invitation to attend this symposium has been Bernardino Forest, the UCLA Conference Center extended to the t'S members that make up the is located on the north shore of lake Arrowhead. following boards d commissions: the Orange The conference facility is made available to gov- County Transportation Authority, the Orange emment and non-profit organizations at a substan- County Fire Authority, the Orange County Sanita- tially reduced rate. All amenities are included in the tion District, the Orange County Transportation registration fee, including participation in the sym- Corridor Agencies, the County of Orange, the Or- pasium,meals,and lodging. ange County Loral Agency Formation Conmris- sion, and the Orange County Division of the Symposium participants will be housed in two League of Cilifnmia Cities. bedroom, two bathroom condolers. You'll be given an opportunity to_select your own house- The diir;Ahw far rigfthVion Is %81h mate when completing the registration form. We Detailed registration information is outlined on the will do our best to accommodate your requests. enclosed registration form, including the answers to frequently asked questions. Please complete the You can get more information about the UCLA form and mail it per the instructions provided The Conference Center, including detailed driving di- registration fee is $350 per participant, which is rections, by visiting the conference center's web- fully inclusive of all Symposium materials, lodging, site at www.uclaconferencecentencom, and meals. r�r ORANGE COUNTY LEADERSHIP SYMPOSIUM ;1 c/o Orange County LAFCO 12 Civic Center Plaza, Room 235 Santa Ana, CA 92701 REGISTRATION FORM: ORANGE COUNTY 07 ❑ Yes, I will attend the OCLS `Il� ❑ No, I am unable to attend the OCLS PARTICIPANT INFORMATION: Name: symposium I Title- REGISTRATION INFO: Organizational Affiliations: (check all that apply) HOW TO REGISTER ❑ County of Orange ❑ Orange County Fire Authority Your invatmat in this leadership ❑ Orange County Sanitation District ❑ Orange County LAFCO experience is $350, which indudes symposium materials, hsdM and ❑ Orange County Transportation Authority ❑ League of Cities-OC meals. Complete this fo®in its ea- ❑ Orange County Transporttion Condor Agencies drety and nail it along with the regis- ❑ City of nation fee of $350 todd dx aress specified.Wes,uwtruemeymoregix- burrow by T.rudw. aww&r rack Address: for you to be b dsded in Me ervnr Due to program fomat and capacity City: Zip: limits at the wnfermce center, sym- posium participants are ducounged from bringing V=a Phone: Fax: TIME SCHEDULE&ATTIRE Email address: The symposium will bep%a promptly at 130 p.m. on Sua., January 13 h r� Please arrive around noon SPECIAL REQUESTS:to allow time to register and eecdve synq o sium mare isle. Lunch wig be pro- Guest Room: ❑ Smoking ❑ Non-smoking vided w you upon amval. We reco®ad that you dreg in ear Preferred housemate• ud attire and bring a sweater due to possd,le puctuatiow in room rrm. Requests (i.e., dietary restrictions,special accommodations,etc.): peranne. You will receive additional infonna- tionai materials following mgisnation which wIl serve u yom confi®ation of aorollment.The literature will pro- vide additional details about the sym- Mail mmpleted form with$3J0 registration fee to. posiurn, indudwg driving di— and arpool options. ORANGE COUNTY LEADERSHIP SYMPOSIUM CANCEIATION POLICY C/o League of California Cities-OC Division We know that despite the best inten- tions, last minute schedule danger 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd.,Suite 214 do occur.We will gladly issue refunds Santa Ana, CA 92701-4542 for anctDadoas made on or before FAX: (714) 972-1816 December 27tb,minus a$75 pro x ss- ing fee. Nnfottunstely, due to con- =ct,W commitments,ure want be un- Please dins any questions and requests for information to whoca i el a tt this to participants Heatber Dion at 14 972-0077 or Danielle Ball at 14 $34-6212. who camel afar this date.) � ) � ) fresnobee.com Local News n Pag 1 f 3 �'- Home Local News I Marketplace I Sports I CentralValley I JobOuest I Archive I Speed ® email this nodw-tbis )VTMIheStaity usuhrimbe_to-the.punt To IO u 1 . . t . article article bulletin edition — - - Local NEWS • Plea LOCAL Kings rejects addition of sludge Sostex y County refuses to extend an Politics agreement with Orange County. • Des Agriculture By Kam Ginis eaten Faith &Values The Fresno Bee chart (Published Wednesday, December, 19, Births 20019:39AM) • Coo STATE backs HANFORD -- After listening to two hours of testimony Tuesday, Kings NATIONAL County supervisors unanimously voted not to allow Orange County to State WORLD continue putting treated sewage sludge on farmland new Corcoran for • Mac the next eight years. over. SPORTS acces BUSINESS The Orange County Sanitation District requested an eight-year extension . New LIFESTYLE under Kings County's biosolids ordinance,which limits the type of the S OPINION sewage sludge that can be used as farmland fertilizer. Valle' COLUMNISTS • San SPECIAL REPORTS The sanitation district bough[ 1,80U acres from Kings County farmer elves Shaen Magan for$3.5 million in June 2000,before the board passed its place GALLERIES ordinance. That land was purchased so the sanitation district could truck count OBITUARIES in sewage sludge from Orange County and use it to fertilize the land. Natioi SPEAK OUT • Cap. TEXT ONLY Now that the board denied the extension, Orange County has only one fight, WEATHER more year to bring certain types of sludge into Kings County. Within five after years,it will be allowed to put only a composted form of the material on gear, ABOUT US the land. FEEDBACK • Ruli M arm RESOURCES "I think [the board] made an excellent decision," Hanford resident death MARKETPLACE Manuel Pereira said. "We have enough of this stuff coming in right now, draw: YELLOW PAGES and we don't want anymore. We're tired of it." • Nev adopted in January, dead, SHOPS The ordinance, ado p ary, calls for the removal of Class B work NATIONAL PARKS biosolids from farmland by January 2003. Class B biosolids are sewage taus I comics sludge that contains pathogens, or disease-causing microorganisms. Sport CROSSWORD • Nor GAMES Officials with the sanitation district maintain that using Class B biosolids aeyb, as fertilizer does not pose a threat to people or the environment. The NEWSPAPERS IN district may consider filing a lawsuit. • NFL EDUCATION alreao SUBSCRIBE "We're very disappointed," said Blake Anderson, the district's general COMMUNITIES manager. "We believe we made our case. The use of biosolids on e CENTRALVALLEY agricultural land is an appropriate use of that material." Seam file://C:\TEMP\fresnobee.com Local News.htm 12/19/2001 ticsnobee.com I Local News Page 2 of 3 VIDA EN EL VALLE V.__ FRESNO Sanitation districts in Orange County and Los Angeles County,which or,se NEIGHBORS bring thousands of tons of treated sewage sludge to farmland in the �Men CLOVIS Central Valley each year,already sued Kern County in an effort to I`""` INDEPENDENT overturn its restrictive biosolids ordinance.A judge ruled against the ear SIERRA GATEWAY Southern California agencies in November. r0:16M Community CalendareeFind e"rls Sludge,or biosolids, is what's left after wastewater is treated at sewage hapning in plants.It's classified into three categories: Class B,Class A and Class Athe Valley EQ,which stands for"exceptional quality." Kings County s ordinance eventually bans classes B and A,which contain traces of pathogens or disease-causing microorganisms. The opw county is allowing only Class A in a compost form,which doesn't contain pathogens and is mixed with green waste to lower the level of heavy metals. ! F The ordinance allows people who already have permits for applying sewage sludge two years to switch to Class A.Within five years,they can use only the"exceptional quality"compost form. When Orange County purchased the land from Magan,it also obtained ownership of the permits to apply biosolids. It claims that Orange County taxpayers have a$3.5 million investment in the land,which they will lose if the district can't put Class B biosolids on the property for at least the next eight years. "We invested a great deal of money to be good neighbors,"said Tom Woodnrft;a lawyer for the sanitation district. "The rug got pulled out from under us,and now we can't go on with our plans. Our taxpayers just want to recoup on their investment" Kings County counsel argued,however,that the only way an extension would be granted is if the sanitation district installed or constructed permanent improvements on the land.Those improvements can be pumps,wells,fences or other types of infiastrncture. Woodruff claimed the permits should be considered improvements to the land,because it increases the value of the land. He also said the permits allow the district to put biosolids on the land,which he believes improves the quality of the farmland. "The 1,800-acre parcel of farmland didn't have much value,except for the pen nit,"he said. The property had an assessed value of just more than$1 million. Peter Moock, assistant county counsel,disagreed and said the permits are not viewed as an improvements under the ordinance: "Permits are not improvements;they are not tangible things. A permit may have value, but the reality is this ordinance says you have to install or construct fileJ/C:\TEMP\fiesnobee.com Local News.htm 12/19/2001 fresnobee.com Local News Page 3 of 3 permanent improvements." Residents who attended the hearing Tuesday applauded the board's action. Some said Orange County needs to find somewhere else to dispose of its waste. "I think we have a fair ordinance,"Hanford resident Maxine Wade said. "I think these people should start thinking of a way to purify their sludge and use it in another way." The reporter can be reached at kginis@fresnobec.com or 622-2417. Speak Outl on News We invite your comments about this article.Registration is required for participation in our Speak Out!forums. Please be aware you are entering a public forum and your messages can be viewed by others. If you are trying to contact the reporter, please visit our About Us section. You only need to register once. If you have already registered please click on Post to participate or View to read messages. F-PED FNEE file://C:\TEMP\fresnobee.com Local News.htm 12/19/2001 Wnfomie Water Environment ��w�eme c �Federationm MrWabN FWobMmmxa California Water Environment Association & Water Environment Federation Present CONTROL OF FATS, OILS, & GREASE (FOG) ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE January 29-30, 2002 Atrium Hotel at Orange County Airport Irvine, California EPASupported in cooperative agreement by US Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Water Water Environment Federation® Hrven�ing&Enb na rg theGla'xY R6terPandnnnnent 601 Wythe Street Alexandria,VA 22314-1994 USA www.weLorg TRAINING COURSE (This course has limited space.-Please Register Early-Please do not make travel arrangements min registration is confirmed.) CONTROL OF FATS,OILS,& GREASE FACULTY (FOG) Jan Pickrel ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE EPA Headquarters-Office of Water, Washington,DC COURSE DESCRIPTION Over the last few years,WEF, in partnership with Leon Holt the US EPA, has developed a Fats, Oils, and Town of Cary,North Carolina Grease Control Training Course and has been conducting workshops at various locations across Nick Arhontes the country. Orange County Sanitation District After the success of this Introductory FOG Control Jack Dickinson course, WEF has developed an advanced FOG City of San Jose, California training. Utilizing the knowledge of experts already involved in the control of fats, oils, and Craig Stone grease, this new course presents implementation Former Restaurateur,Avery,California details for a variety of FOG control options for fats,oils,and grease. HOTEL INFORMATION Atrium Hotel at Orange County Airport The purpose of the training course is to present a 18700 Mac Arthur Boulevard well developed approach that can be used by Irvine,CA 92612 utilities to design and implement their own site- (800)854-3012 specific FOG control programs for preventing or (949)757-0330 eliminating the entry of FOG into the collection system. Rate: $99.00 per night,government rate same Airport Shuttle: Free shuttle,use courtesy AGENDA phone at airport. January 29, 2002 Parking: $9.00 a day valet Registration: 7:30 a.m. -8:30 a.m. $6.00 a day self-parking Course: 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. CONTACT HOURS January 30, 2002 WEF will issue a Certificate of Attendance to Course: 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. each participant recording 12 contact hours for the Advanced FOG Course. COURSE FEE ADDITIONAL COURSE INFORMATION ADVANCE $200 For additional information concerning course (On or before January 11,2002) content,please contact Patrick Bradley,USEPA, ON-SITE $250 at 202-564-0729. (After January 11,2002) For additional information about other Hot Topic Registration Deadline: Registrations received Workshops,contact the WEF Customer Service after January 11,2002 will be processed on a Center at 1-800-666-0206 or visit the WEF web space-available basis at the onsite rate. page at www.wef ore. ADVANCED FOG CONTROL TRAINING COURSE MODULES Introduction/Overview Design Issues • Assuring effective grease trap/interceptor Marketing of Your Grease Control Program design • How to convince your administration and • Sample collection stakeholders that they need an Oil & • Bioremediation Grease Control Program Alternative Methods: Generation and Interception Permits • Identification and Classification of Operation & Maintenance Issues Sources Grease trap and interceptor MOM • Permitting Process • How do I ensure the use of reputable waste haulers? Legal Authority • How can I confirm that FOG wastes are • Writing good sewer use ordinances and properly disposed of7 grease control regulations Lateral cleaning issues—Who's • Sample ordinances from several responsible for the grease? successful programs • Vapor hood cleaning • Attorneys Case Studies • EPA-CID Case Studies Additives • Pros/Cons Enforcement • Case studies • Violation recognition • Enforcement response guide Grease Control Program - • Enforcement documents keeping/Information Management • Integration of Oil &Grease Program • Fines &penalties information into Collection Systems Oil&Grease Management databases/information systems • Tracking the effectiveness of your FOG • Grease creators Control Program • Pollution prevention • Permitting and inspection Success Stories • Disposal and containment Additional Resources for Implementing LeReview Inspection Training Grease Control Programs Current Regulations on Techniques Summary g Facility Operational Data ting Inspection Fortes on Concerns and endations FOG COURSE REGISTRATION FORM Irvine,California Registration Instructions Please send me WEF/CWEA membership information_ Complete the registration form below. Payment must accompany registration forms. (Photocopies of checks are not acceptable.) Make checks payable to California Water Environment Association. Approved US government purchase orders must accompany the registration form. To Register By Fax: (credit card &purchase orders only) (510)382-7810 By Mail (Check,credit card,Government Purchase Order) to: CWEA 7677 Oakport Street,Suite 525 Oakland,CA 94611 AMOUNT Advance(on or before January 11,2002) $20.00 On-site(after January 11,2002) $250.00 TOTAL PAYMENT(Payment must accompany this form.) Deadline: January 11,2002 Registration Forms will not be processed after the deadline. Last Name First Name Company: Job Title: Address City Stale Country Zip Telephone Fax Email Method of Payment: ❑ Government PO (0) PO No. ❑ Company Check(C) Check No. ❑ Personal Check (P) Check No. ❑ AMEX ❑ Master Card ❑ VISA ❑ DISCOVER Credit Card Number Expiration Date Signature I authorize C WEA to charge my credit card for the amount listed above. Written cancellation notice is required,and must be received at least 30 days prior to the conference date. A 25%service fee shall be retained on all cancellations. No refunds shall be given for cancellations made less than 30 days prior to any conference. Is raid -on local coffers coming? A decade ago, slate's coffers were overflowing, next year and doesn't want to be f when the state Republicans, including Wilson, t�a tax-anaspen T6eral. a found itself in a demanded and got a sharp reduc- Ironically,even a remote pos n- ' 'i:'1 deep budgetary tion in the annual property tax bility that the VLF backfill to lo- ' j hole,then-Gov. that California motorists pay on cal governments might be re- s Pete Wilson and their vehicles.It's known offs- duced is a political Godsend to , the Legislature cially as the"vehicle license fee" the League of California Cities, indirectly tapped or VLF,but unofficially as the which has of the impo- RAN into local govern- "car tax." - tence of local governments in the •ALTERS ment treasuries Although the state collects the zero-sum game of budget politics - �a ,O,tBee to dig themselves VLF,its proceeds flow to local and has been gearing up to columnis out.Wilson and governments,so when the Legis- change the dynamics of the game. lawmakers cre- lature and Wilson reduced it, The league is opening a series ated what they called the Educa- they promised to"backfill"the of field offices that,it says,will tional Revenue Augmentation lost revenues to local govern- organize grassroots support for Fund and used it to shift several meats.The car tax cut was en- local governments to bolster its billion dollars a year in property acted-and later accelerated un- Sacramento lobbying and has toes from local governments to der Wilson successor Gray Davis. been shopping around the notion "schools,thus allowing the state to to more than two-thirds of the of an initiative ballot measure reduce aid to school districts by original tax.The state's backfall of that would protect local govern- an identical amount. the VLF revenues to loci v-- ment revenues from depredation Cities,counties andspecial ms- ernments now amounts to more in Sacramento.The VLF threat tricts had to eat the revenue re- that$3.5 billion a yen. helps the league by underscoring duuction.Although much of it was Once again,the state fends it- the political vulnerability of local later restored in various guises, self m an •spei+ulgbudget revenues, the makeup money often came crisis as state income taxes de- It's not clear how serious the with strings dictating bow it c e ly.Will Davis and leg- league is about political activism could be spent.And about a third islators ease their budget crunch -whether it's aimed at truly mak- of the lost property taxes was by reducing the VLF subventions ing local governments a bigger never restored even when the to local governments,emulating force in Sacramento or merely . state was enjoying multibfl- the ERAF grab?Or will they al- _demonstrating to unhappy city lion-dollar budget surpluses. low the car tax to rise again? leaders that the organization is . The ERAF,not surprisingly,is Both steps are on the table as Da- being aggressive so that they'll a very dirty word among local vis and lawmakers begin to figure continue to pay their dues.How . government officials.And they out how to handle a deficit that local governments fare in the are now worried that history is could be more than$12 billion. new budget cl will demon- about to repeat itself with moth- But it's equally clear that Davis strate whetber they continue to er crisis-inspired state govern- will raise taxes,m be stepchildren of Sacramento or 5 ment raid on their treasuries. VI ,only as alaast res— ort Di2ause can regain some of their previous j A few years ago,when the he running for re-e ectson independence. 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 19, 2001 —7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Huntington Beach Debbie Cook* Connie Boardman La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian' Orange Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy' WaaMdatal\wp.dWagendalBoard Agendas12001 Board AgendaM121901 minute excerpts.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Govemment Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on_ w q , 200/ was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on /3 , 20� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1?day of 201/ l Penny M. Kyl , ecretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District X1RADON\DATA?\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BSXFORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.00C " ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 12, 2001 phone: (714)982-2411 To the Chair and Members fam of the Board of Directors r71419820356 mmm.atea.tem Subject: Board Letter mailing em,m.a: P.O. hoe 8127 F htoin Vellay.CA 92728-SI27 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional ar..e adidtete: information on any of the items, please call me. 10844 Ellis Avenue Zrtain Valle,CA 92706 7016 California Rebuild America Coalition (CaIRAC)to Advance Infrastructure Investment Aaenda (from Sarah Layton, CaIRAC Executive Vice President) Member Ap...me As the state budget outlook continues to dim, the conversations in Sacramento have 0 changed dramatically. Whereas earlier in the year the entire focus was on "fixing" the citem energy crisis, discussions now revolve around preventing terror attacks in California. Angh.nn Similarly, the challenge for California leaders managing the state's resources has Srea made a 180-degree turn. Once they debated spending the state budget surplus; now acne Park they debate allocating spending ruts. Lypreae Fountain Valley Fullerton Now more than ever a message about infrastructure investment needs to be heard Garden Grove around the state. No longer can we afford to only focus on our cash assets. We also Huntington seath must focus on our physical assets, California infrastructure facilities and stems. It wine P y y La Habra is NOT okay to patch our budget deficit by continuing to grow our infrastructure debt. Le Painn. Yet that is exactly what will happen without a groundswell of support for rebuilding LA.at Beach and maintaining these assets in an effort to protect and enhance our quality of life. NaLA.Al.eacn g P Q tY Orange Placentia The California Rebuild America Coalition (CaIRAC)intends to send that message Santa ant seal canton loud and clear to its target audiences:the public, policymakers and the media. (The Stanton Sanitation District is a founding member of CaIRAC.) Mann Ylla Perk CaIRAC's new public affairs director, Michael Bowman, is working with the CaIRAC vcrba unfit P 9 executive committee to fine-tune an Infrastructure Investment Agenda for the coming County or Orange year. Items on the final agenda will be promoted to the public, policyrrakers and the media via the Coalition's suite of communication tools. Sanitary Oisctnte Once the agenda is finalized, the executive committee will flesh out a teat.Ma.. communications plan designed to convey key messages around these topics and in Midway city conjunction with debate taking place on specific initiatives that fall under these topics. water Districts Irvine Ranch Letters to the editor, press conferences, brochures,fact sheets, talking points, presentations, and seminars are all part of the tools that CaIRAC has developed and will use to build support for infrastructure funding. A human network of infrastructure advocates around the state is also being developed that includes the business and public works communities working together. For his part, Mr. Bowman has been meeting with groups like the California Chamber of Commerce, the Governor's Commission on Building for the 21 an Century, and the League of California Cities, to name a few. re maintain world class leadership in wastewater and water resource management oh.. , Members of the Board Page 2 December 12, 2001 EPA's Proposed Sanitary Sewer Overflow Rule aka CMOM EPA has announced that the draft notice of the proposed Rule is to be published in the Federal Register in the fall of 2002. A 120-day public comment period is planned to follow publication. At this time EPA will be reviewing and possibly modifying the previous draft that was developed in late 2000 but never published. The Office of Management and Budget(OMB)will also make a final review prior to publication. EPA has established a new website for the proposed rule with related information and the link is as follows: httpJPofpub.epa.gov/npdes/sso/ssorule.cfm?program_id=4. OCSD will continue to follow the progress of this proposed rule and participate through AMSA, WEF and other organizations. Cities and sewering agencies should also follow EPA's progress using the EPA web site link shown above. We will also modify OCSD's web site in the near future to add this new important link. EPA's only cost estimate thus far is that for a collection system serving 7,500 people the annual cost is estimated at$6,000 excluding repairs or upgrades. We are trying to obtain a copy of OMB's previous cost analysis and estimate because we believe the EPA estimate is unrealistic. AMSA Survey on Dioxin in Biosolids AMSA has published the results from its recent Survey of Dioxin-Like Compounds in Biosolids:Statistical Analyses (Final Report). The results come from a voluntary survey begun in October 2000 to develop a comparison of agencies nationwide with the EPA proposed 1999 limit for Dioxin. The survey included 111 wastewater treatment agencies from 31 states. The Orange County Sanitation District participated in the survey. EPA has indicated that this information, along with its own data, will be useful in developing the final rule. EPA is currently conducting a new risk assessment, and AMSA expects that the new rule will be proposed sometime after next Spring. AMSA's summary of the Final Report is attached for your review. Key conclusions of the Final Report include: • Concentrations of dioxin in biosolids in AMSA's 2000/2001 Survey have declined from the 1994/1995 Survey; • The average dioxin concentration in AMSA's 2000/2001 Survey is 48.5 parts per trillion (ppt). All but one of the 200 samples from the survey would comply, and most are well within compliance with the proposed regulatory standard of 300 (ppt); Members of the Board Page 3 December 12, 2001 • The median dioxin concentration of the samples in AMSA's survey is 21.7 ppt, more than one order of magnitude below the proposed regulatory limit. Legislative Updates Governor Davis Signs Legislation of Interest to OCSD: • AB 285 by Assembly member Howard Wayne (D-San Diego)requires the State Water Resources Control Board to track sewage spills throughout the state by creating and maintaining a database on sewer system overflows. The Board will be required to make this information available to the Legislature and the public via the Internet, or some other cost-effective means. The Sanitation District staff has been working with the State and Regional Water Quality Control Board staffs to develop an integrated electronic reporting system to provide more rapid and streamlined reporting of sanitary sewer overflows. Sanitation District staff was pleased that the final version of this bill will accommodate the developing system. Oct. 4 Chaptered by Secretary of State-Chapter 498, Statutes of 2001. • AB 639 by Assembly member George Nakano(D-Torrance)requires the development of rapid diagnostic tests to measure potential bacterial contamination in waters adjacent to public beaches. The tests will provide timely warnings to the public about the risk to public health.The Water Resources Control Board will work with the Department of Health services, the University of California, and SCCWRP to develop these tests. We see this as an important tool for our use and hope the new test can be developed. Oct. 4 Chaptered by Secretary of State-Chapter 502, Statutes of 2001. • SB 633 by Senator Byron Sher(D-Palo Alto) places new controls on the disposal of appliances and vehicle components found to contain mercury. It restricts the use and distribution of mercury containing fever thermometers to only upon prescription of a physician. CASA and Tri-TAC actively participated in support of this legislation, but concerns about trace amounts of mercury in button batteries nearly scuttled the legislation as it sat on the Governor's desk. The makers of the Barbie doll agreed to pull their last minute objections to the bill upon an agreement to follow-up next year with clean-up language. Mercury is currently not a problem for us but any reduction in its use in consumer products is environmentally helpful. Oct. 10 Chaptered by Secretary of State- Chapter 656, Statutes of 2001. h,. Members of the Board Page 4 December 12, 2001 Asset Accounting: GASB 34 Workshop Scheduled Asset management, asset accounting,and long tens management of public infrastructure have been talked about more often within public agencies than ever before. GASB 34 is a set of accounting procedures that public agencies are expected to incorporated into their business practices to better understand the value of the public infrastructure assets they own and operate. If your staff has not yet been exposed to these new standards,then they may want to attend the February 28 workshop that is announced in the attached Flyer. District-Wide Compensation and Classification Studv The District-wide Compensation and Classification study is nearing completion after nine months of hard work on the part of employees, HR staff,the Executive Management Team and the consulting firm of Johnson &Associates. Over the past three months, numerous presentations have been made to the Executive Management Team, the FAHR and Steering Committees and managers to present information on the recommended classifications and the compensation system. Within the next few weeks a number of items will be completed. Employees will receive written responses addressing the employee comments regarding their classification allocation and classification specifications, the allocation of each classification to a pay grade will be finalized, and the complete study and recommendations will be presented to the FAHR Committee in closed session on January 9. Communications Updates Treatment Level Outreach On Monday, December 20,we began filming an 8-minute video about the issues surrounding our ocean release of wastewater and the permit. The video will contain footage of the facility in Fountain Valley. It will also contain interviews with key staff to talk about the public involvement process,the routine and extensive ocean monitoring program and the summer studies. Upon completion, the video will be distributed to all city council and special district board members and local cable stations. Members of the Board Page 5 December 12, 2001 We continue to speak with various community groups and individuals about the issue of the ocean release permit and our ocean-monitoring program. To date we have spoken to more than 30 civic and community groups. In November, Bob Ghirelli appeared twice on HBTV Channel 3 to talk about the issue, and Dr. Peter Green and I appeared speaking about treatment level issues and infrastructure issues. Bob and I spoke to five groups. We reached over 150 people in November alone, not counting the number of people who may have watched Bob on HBTV. Groundwater Reolenishment System We are in the process of conducting research for GW RS. Six focus groups were held on December 3,4, and 5. Approximately 10 people were in each group ranging in age from 28—70. Two of the groups were mixed with men and women, one group was comprised of all women and one with all men. One group was comprised of English-speaking Hispanic residents and one group was English-speaking Asian residents. Participants were selected from a list of registered voters. Several screening questions were asked to select the best participants from a variety of cities in our service area. Participants were asked which, if any, community groups or activities they participated in during the past several years. They were asked if they have children who live in the household. We were looking for mothers with young children to be in each mixed or all women's group, because past research shows they were more likely to oppose this type of project. A full report of the results of the focus groups will be available in January. Bushard Trunkline Proiect Public outreach for the Bushard Trunkline project is beginning in earnest. David Ludwin will be presenting the project to the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association on Tuesday, December 11. A presentation is also scheduled for the Huntington Beach City Council on Monday, December 17. The Bushard Trunkline is a major sewer line that serves the cities of Fountain Valley, Westminster, Garden Grove, Stanton, Fullerton and Buena Park. It is one of nine sewers within Orange County Sanitation District's existing service area that will be replaced and upgraded to provide additional sewage capacity for the growing communities. Please see the attached factsheet for more information. Members of the Board Page 6 December 12, 2001 Back Bay Trunkline Proiect The Back Bay Trunkline project is entering its second and third construction phases. These phases are projected to be completed February 15. The construction work has proceeded well with few complaints from residents in the area. Ongoing communication with the community continues. We are working very closely with the Park Newport Apartments that are adjacent to the construction site. Media Relations Local reporters were very interested in the Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR) project on the last OMTS agenda. Articles appeared in both the Times Orange County and the Orange County Register, United Way Campaign The District has participated in the United Way fund raising for the past several years. One of the most successful events is selling Casual Day Any Day stickers. This year District employees pledged $5700. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. 164QL� Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt 0:\WPDTAADM1" LLETTERE TO THE BOARDO"121101DW Attachments Final Report AMSA is pleased to present the final AMSA 200012001 Survey of Dioxin-Like Compounds in Biosolids: Statistical Analyses (Final Report), which demonstrates that levels of dioxin-like compounds in biosolids are on average well below EPA's proposed 1999 limit and have declined since the previous AMSA survey was conducted in 1994 and 1995. The Final Report marks the culmination of a voluntary survey AMSA began in October 2000 to determine current levels of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds (including seven polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, ten polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and twelve dioxin-like coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)) (hereinafter dioxin) in biosolids. AMSA thanks all the agencies that participated in this survey, which is likely the most comprehensive investigation into dioxin levels in biosolids to date. Without the participation of AMSA member agencies and other POTWs across the country, this effort would not have been possible. AMSA's survey was triggered in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) December 23, 1999 proposal of a 300 parts per trillion (ppt) toxic equivalents (TEQ) level for land-applied biosolids under a Consent Decree involving AMSA, environmental groups, and EPA (Gearhart v. Whitman). In developing the proposed regulation, EPA used historical data from its 1988 National Sewage Sludge Survey and AMSA's 1994/1995 Survey of Dioxin-like Compounds in Biosolids. Although EPA's risk analysis for the proposed limit of 300 ppt-TEQ assumed that levels of dioxin-like compounds in biosolids were remaining constant or diminishing, AMSA believed there was a need for current data to further support this assumption. AMSA also wanted to assess overall trends in concentrations of dioxin-like compounds in biosolids since AMSA's 199411995 Survey of dioxin in biosolids, AMSA's data will assist EPA in its efforts to finalize an environmentally sound and technically based regulation for dioxin in land-applied biosolids. Key conclusions of the Final Report include: Concentrations of dioxin in biosolids in AMSA's 2000/2001 Survey have declined from the 1994/1995 Survey; • The average dioxin concentration in AMSA's 2000/2001 Survey is 48.5 ppt-TEQ. All but one of the 200 samples from the survey would comply, and most go well beyond compliance with the proposed regulatory standard of 300 ppt-TEQ; • The median dioxin concentration of the samples in AMSA's survey is 21.7 ppt- TEQ, more than one order of magnitude below the proposed regulatory limit; and • Evidence from the survey suggests there may be some variation in dioxin concentrations in biosolids among EPA Regions, but further study will be needed to fully test such a hypothesis and demonstrate that such variation is not an artifact of the sampling method or simply random variation. The Final Report and associated appendices can be found on AMSA's web site at: http://www.amsa-cleanwater.orci/advocacy/dioxin/dioxin.cfm. Details on AMSA's 200012001 Survey As indicated above, AMSA began its voluntary survey to determine current levels of dioxin in biosolids in October 2000. On July 12, 2001 AMSA met with EPA to discuss the preliminary results of the survey and to provide EPA with preliminary data to supplement the results EPA had obtained from its own recent survey of dioxin in biosolids. AMSA also presented these preliminary findings to the membership at the 2001 AMSA Summer Conference. Since that time, AMSA has worked with our survey consultant Cambridge Environmental, Inc. to conduct a final quality assurance/quality control review of the survey data and to prepare a comprehensive report of the findings. Overall, 111 separate wastewater treatment agencies participated in the 2000/2001 AMSA Survey, providing 200 samples from 171 POTWs, located in 31 states. A review of the new survey data reveals that the dioxin concentrations of the 200 biosolids samples ranged from 7.1 ppt-TEQ to 256 ppt-TEQ, with one outlier at 3,590 ppt-TEQ. As stated above, the mean (average) concentration was 48.5 ppt-TEQ, while the median concentration was 21.7 ppt-TEQ. All but one of the samples from the 2000/2001 Survey would comply with a regulatory standard of 300 ppt-TEQ. Notably, the median dioxin concentration of the samples is more than one order of magnitude below the proposed regulatory limit. A summary of the 2000/2000 data is contained in Table A. Table A Statistics for TEQ Data" (ppt-TEQ) Non-detects set to one half he detection limits Total Dioxins and PCBs Furans Average 48.5 38.4 10.0 (Mean) Minimum 7.10 5.94 0.54 10 Percentile 9.65 7.55 1.75 5 Percentile 13.09 9.55 2.99 Median 21.67 15.15 .70 5 Percentile 36.00 4.81 10.06 0 Percentile 54.00 7.36 16.98 5 Percentile 88.07 3.24 8.14 9 Percentile 226.12 118.28 81.04 Maximum P590.05 578.61 28.65 EPA has proposed a 300 ppt-TEQ limit for land applied biosolids, using the International toxicity equivalency factors (TEF)scheme for the seventeen 2,3,7,8- substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans congeners, and the World Health Organization's (WHO)TEF scheme for the twelve coplanar PCBs. However, data in Table A was developed using the more conservative WHO scheme for all dioxin-like compounds. a EPA has indicated that all non-detected congeners will be assumed to be present at one-half of the detection limit in the final rule. Comparison ofAMSA 199411995 Data and 200012001 Data AMSA compared data from its 2000/2001 and 1994/1995 surveys to determine if there has been a statistically significant change in the dioxin levels reported by POTWS. In the 1994/1995 Survey there were a total of 104 sample analyses from 75 separate facilities. Five of the samples had biosolids concentrations of less than 0.1%. These were omitted from further consideration as not being representative of biosolids, leaving 99 sample analyses from 74 separate facilities. Table B contains a comparison of the data from AMSA's 1994/1995 and 2000/2001 surveys. Table B Comparison of Modified 1994/1995 and 2000/2001 Data Sets Non-detects set to the detection limits Non-detects set to zero Dioxins Dioxins Adjusted and PCBs Adjusted and PCBs Total Furane Subsets Total Furans^ Subsets 1994 2000 1994 2000 1994 2000 1994 2000 1994 2000 1994 2000 1995 2001 1995 2001 1995 2001 1995 2001 1995 2001 1995 2001 Number Of POTWs 74 171 74 171 74 171 74 171 74 171 74 171 Average (Mean) 81.7 52.5 57.3 44.1 24.4 8.4 60.5 41.1 36.3 36.1 24.2 5.04 Median 55.7 25.0 44.6 19.2 9.3 4.8 37.0 13.3 25.5 11.3 9.2 1.5 "Total of dioxin/furan TEO and PCB subset TEO only. e Only 4 PCB congeners with non-zero TEF values were analyzed in the 1994/1995 survey (PCB-77, PCB-81, PCB-126, PCB-169). Thus, only these four congeners are used to determine the PCB subset TEO for the 2000/2001 samples in this comparison. Note: Since the 1994/1995 data was developed with non-detects "at zero" and "at the detection limits," this comparison (in Table B) does not contain a comparison with non-detects "at one half the detection limits. Overall, these results help to confirm that concentrations of dioxin in biosolids are declining. Although we were not able to conduct a review of dioxin concentrations on a facility-by-facility basis (between the two surveys), a comparison of the results does indicate that the averages (means) and medians of the data are lower in the 2000/2001 data set than in the 1994/1995 data set.When non-detected congeners are assumed to be absent, the median dioxin/furan TEO concentration declined by 56%, the median PCB subset TEO concentration (containing only those PCB congeners analyzed in the 1994/1995 survey) declined by 83%, and the median adjusted total TEO mass fraction declined by 64%. The corresponding averages declined by 0.5%, 79%, and 32%, respectively. Thus, it appears the decrease in average total TEO between the two sets of survey results is driven by declining PCB concentrations. Next Steps AMSA will provide EPA with the Final Report and the raw survey data. Although EPA will rely primarily on its own survey data when conducting the risk assessment for the final rulemaking, EPA has indicated that the results from the AMSA survey will be helpful in developing the final regulation. EPA is required to finalize the regulation for dioxin in land-applied biosolids by December 15, 2001 under the Consent Decree. However, in addition to AMSA's now available Final Report, EPA itself has collected significant new data on dioxin in biosolids since the rule was proposed in December 1999. EPA also is conducting a new risk assessment to support the final rule. Accordingly, AMSA and the Consent Decree parties have extended the December 15 deadline for EPA to complete the rule until March 1, 2002. In addition, in Spring 2002 EPA is expected to approve a new and significantly more stringent Agency-wide cancer value for dioxin. EPA plans to use this new value, if approved, in the land applied biosolids rule. The use of this new cancer value is expected to significantly impact EPA's risk assessment for the rule. Since March 1 is likely unachievable given the volume of new scientific information, AMSA and the parties continue to negotiate a further extension of the deadline beyond March 1. AMSA anticipates that a longer extension will be agreed upon, and that there will be additional notice and comment opportunities for the membership on this new scientific information and other developments since the rule's proposal in December 1999. AMSA will report to the membership when our negotiations successfully establish a new deadline for EPA to complete this regulation. At that time, we will outline the process for additional notice and comment and AMSA's plans for developing comments. These plans include comprehensive reviews of EPA's survey data, assessment of the impact of the new dioxin cancer value, and evaluation of EPA's new risk assessment model to ensure the final regulation is realistic and scientifically sound. It is important to note that under the same Consent Decree, EPA is expected to finalize by December 15, 2001 a regulation establishing no dioxin limit for landfilled or incinerated biosolids. We do not anticipate any delays in EPA meeting this deadline for these two biosolids options. For More Information If you have any questions or require additional information concerning the survey or the Final Report, please do not hesitate to contact Robert P. Dominak, Co-Chair, AMSA Biosolids Management Committee at 216/881-6600 or Chris Hornbeck, AMSA at 202/833-9106 or chomback(cDamsa-cleanwater.om. For questions on the dioxin litigation, contact Alexandra Dunn, AMSA's General Counsel at 202/533-1803 or adunnna amsa-cleanwater.orq. O Y`e 51N1 Y: % Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement • Background The Bushard Trunk is a major sewer line that serves the cities of Fountain Valley, Westminster.Garden Grove, Stanton, Fullerton and Buena Park. _ It is one of nine sewer lines within Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD) existing service area that will be replaced and upgraded to provide additional sewage capacity for the growing communities. `-= The existing 54inch pipe will be replaced with ap proximately 22,000 feet of new concrete-reinforced pipe.The new 106-inch pipeline will extend from the intersec- tion of Ellis Avenue at Bushard Street in Fountain Valley, down Bushard Street approximately four miles to Banning Avenue,down Banning approximately h mile and end at OCSD treatment Plant No. 2 on Brookhurst in Huntington Beach. • Construction Process Construction will take approximately 18 months and is scheduled to begin spring or summer 2002.The sewer line will be constructed using the open trench construction method. Trenching will require temporary Figure 1: Construction Area road closures during construc- ~�'l t tion.The trench wiil be dug in 0 1 to 'h mile sections.The pipe &Ellis � - will be installed and the trench f backfilled prior to the next V.to I' m fe section being dug.To com- _ Garfield Orangeplete the work, road closures Sanitation . are necessary for a period of two to three weeks.Traffic will Yorktown be rerouted. and access by i To wintain ' emergency vehicles and daily Adams traffic to area homes andand zrater resource --- - - businesses will not be inter- nianagerientrupted. _ Indianapolis Ii Construction will begin at Plant No.2 al Brookhurst andBushard and progress north on ..__.._AtlantaBushard Street.Two traffic lanes ,,ai„•,�,ewill be maintained for the cross Ine antalve.streets al each intersection. HamiltonM eemp�ered vaHen.Crews will also be required to provide ongoing dust mitigation Banninaby hauling away of soil andhan waterin down dust.When nlan—hitterat Plan10844 Ellis Avenue crews finish the construction as nn a�a wmem hoFountain Valley,CA work each day, any open �. • r 18 trenches will be barricaded boa' it... SrH for more information kY Nf or Visit our wiab site ...continued on other side e oaon2lpovewwne Uplaeemean m, Page t • Construction Details Figure 2: Construction Detail ' j Construction is scheduled to occur NOTE:During street construction that crosses weekdays from 7:00 AM to 4:00 major intersections,one traffic lane open to PM, in accordance with city of East and Westbound traffic at all times. Huntington Beach noise and construction ordinances and in the city of Fountain Valley from 7:00 AM Water Truck to 5:30 PM. All equipment will be equipped with mufflers, used to reduce noise. W' I Traffic and Traffic Control • Plan Traffic control plans will be posted at Trench surroundleewwwocsd.com/construction. by cement banners Temporary signs will be made available to businesses impacted by Trenching the construction work to advertise that the business is open during construction. There will be no impacts to bus schedules. Bicycle lanes will be removed temporarily during construction. For more information: Please contact Sonja Wassgren, public informa- tion coordinator at (714) 593-7122.You can also visit us online at www.acsd.com. For details about the Bushard Trunk line click on construction news. 005o/l2a7Ol/BuRha,d R.,loum.nlxd, page 2 Monthly Log of Odor Complaints.2001 ---------------------------------------------------------- meme mei real: won �o �n �o �n �n �o �o �o �.is- m0 oc mr mra ora mr MI.M 13 �. �. U 4AM no WID Yes TOM: 21 Concede"awn, ® ©m mtm Z5r� om �m ®o ors mra mmt era m� I.a mem —. " ora mm ma ors oM era — - m� �. mT �. �m �1. mo orM ora 1014 a era m� erawig B—S Wig wig Rod QQI IW25 no ca �o gym © Y q iw rv.liu`yer Sm COUNTY OF ORANGE �z O V M P.O.Bm,CO PURi-rc FAcLLrTizs&RESOURCESDEPARTmENT s'"m^v,c•5 sz1-4 c7�IF0A��0 Td� (714)M2, Fs (714)M51 (Z, 10.0 f October 1, 2001 COPY T-o —50%1g,E cAizS 0 — SznY rvc.��2 Arthur G. Baggett, Jr., Chair, o ella�c l State Water Resources Control Board F.r r P.O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95812 cc� goh¢b c�T'Ee Dear Mr. Baggett: We understand that the State Water Resources Control Board has a pending petition filed by the Building Industry Association (BIA) appealing the NPDES Permit Issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board for Urban Runoff in San Diego County (San Diego Permit). The purpose of my letter is to respectfully request that if the Board elects to address the matter of the petition filed by the BIA on the San Diego permit, you allow the County of Orange and the partner Cities an opportunity to have our concerns heard by the Board by conducting a full public hearing on the matter. As part of your consideration of that petition, we ask you to allow us to present additional information that would allow the Board to be apprised of and consider broader policy Issues necessarily raised by the San Diego Permit. Orange County recognizes the need to deal with the problem of urban runoff. We recognize that it is not just a water quality issue but also a quality of life Issue that effects all of our citizens. We, therefore, agree that local government Will be critical in effectively dealing With this problem. We also recognize the complexity of the problem. For over ten years the County and the cities within Orange County have worked with Regional Board Staff to develop a Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) designed to address the issue of urban runoff. This has been a huge effort on the part of both local government and Regional Board staff. Our local governments have been taking steps to implement the DAMP by adopting stormwater ordinances and revising existing ordinances to reference and implement this DAMP. The County recognizes that an effective solution to the problem of urban runoff will require that it continue to build on, and refine that work that has already been done. It is committed to that ongoing effort. We have concerns that the results from these very successful efforts may be diminished through recent actions The San Diego Regional Board via its issuance of the final permit for San Diego County appears to be working toward a single standard permit to apply to all watersheds and Arthur G. Baggett, ]r., Chair . State Water Resources Control Board October 1, 2001 Page 2 all cities and counties within its jurisdiction. This approach, however, tends to ignore the substantial efforts made by Orange County and its partner cities and does not build on those existing efforts. This raises serious concerns related to developing an effective approach to deal with the problem of urban runoff. The San Diego Regional Board has now proposed a tentative permit for Southern Orange County (SD-OC Permit) that is virtually identical to the San Diego permit that is the subject of an appeal from the BIA. The Santa Ana Regional Board has recently revised their draft permit for northern Orange County to include requirements that are similar to those in the San Diego permit The County of Orange and several cities in Orange County have made extensive comments on both draft permits. Attached you will find copies of our most recent comments that have been submitted. We provide these for your information and to demonstrate our regard for water quality as an Issue of the highest priority. The comments consist of technical and legal comments but also include some Important policy issues that we feel the State Board should be aware of before it takes any final action on the BIA petition. Despite our extensive comments and concerns regarding some of the proposed language, we want to emphasize that the County as lead permittee and the cities as co-permittees are committed to implementing a great majority of the elements contained in the draft permits as proposed. We recognize that many of the requirements and conditions in those draft permits are absolutely essential to accomplishing our mutual goal of ensuring water quality and we want to assure the Board that we are committed to Implementing them. We recognize that any action you take on the BIA petition may serve as precedent In light of the San Diego Board's dear intent to use the San Diego Permit as the controlling model for all future permits it issues, and the subsequent introduction of similar changes in the draft Santa Ana Permit, it is likely that your action will provide a basis for interpretation and future policy direction in the administration and implementation of both permits. We, therefore, hope that an avenue for the State Board to consider our concerns and provide guidance and direction can be provided. The action taken by the State Board on the BIA petition is likely to affect not just the narrow issues that are presented by the BIA petition but will also have a broader impact on the state agencies and local governments that are working toward implementing the policies embodied in those permits. If the Board should elect to address the matter of the petition filed by the BIA on the San Diego permit, we ask that you provide the County and Cities an opportunity to have our concerns heard by conducting a full public hearing on the matter. This would allow the Board an opportunity to hear our presentations and views on the broader policy Issues necessarily raised by the San Diego Permit and to provide some of the Board member's insight and feedback to the County and cities on these very important issues. Arthur G. Baggett, Jr., Chair State Water Resources Contr6l Board October 1, 2001 Page 3 We thank you for the opportunity to submit our information and concerns for your consideration. As always, Orange County remains committed to fulfilling our obligations; and more importantly we remain committed to resolving water quality as one of our highest priorities. Sincerely, � "° -'-�'e-�' Vidd L Wilson Director Attachments: • County of Orange Primary Policy Concerns with Tentative Orders SDRWQCB 01- 193 and SARWQCB 01-20 • San Diego RWQCB Tentative Order 01-193 August 30, 2001 Comments • Santa Ana RWQCB Tentative Order 01-20 July 6, 2001 Comments Cc: Members, Orange County Board of Supervisors Richard Katz, Board Member State Water Resources Control Board Peter Silva, Board Member State Water Resources Control Board Celeste Contu, Executive Director State Water Resources Control Board Craig M. Wilson, Chief Counsel State Water Resources Control Board Betsy Jennings, Esq., State Water Resources Control Board Michael Schumacher, CEO County of Orange Ken R. Smith, PFRD/Chief Engineer Orange County Permittees Attachment to Letter from Vicki Wilson To Arthur G. Haggett, Jr. October 1, 2001 Primary Policy Concerns with Tentative Orders SDRWQCB 01-193 and SARWQCB 01-20 - • A determination by the Regional Board that our DAMP,which was developed in 1993, is inadequate as the continuing foundation of the Orange County stornwater program—a unilateral determination provided without any prior Indication to the Pernittees. • Local land use decisions are being Imposed via additional prescriptive General Plan revisions and requirements for revised CEQA processes. Prescriptive requirements conflict with constitutionally granted local land use authority(A version of this requirement is also Included In the Santa Ana Regional Board Tentative Order 01-20) • Requirements that water being put into the storm drain system not cause or threaten to cause a condition of pollution, contamination or nuisance—as opposed to allowing regional solutions that might treat runoff and pollution within the storm drain system.This requirement goes beyond the requirements of the Clean Water Act. The corresponding monitoring, reporting and compliance requirements have enormous cost consequences to municipalities when compared to regional approaches now in place or under consideration that effectively accomplish the same objectives of protecting receiving waters. (A version of this requirement Is also included in the Santa Ana Regional Board Tentative Order 01-20) • Permit eliminates the currently acceptable Iterative process(established under State Board Order WQ 99-05) that allows munldpaOtles to systematically address water compliance under the oversight of the Regional Board and still be In compliance with the permit The process and requirements under this permit would put municipalities Into an immediate non-compllance situation, and subject them to potential enforcement actions and third party lawsuits. • Permit requires municipalities to duplicate the regulatory oversight already In place for construction site and Industrial facilides that are addressed under State General permits—Imposes additional costs on municipalities and businesses, requiring municipalities to perform tasks that are now State responsibilities. (A version of this requirement Is also Included in the Santa Ana Regional Board Tentative Order 01-20) • Permit establishes an Intensely prescriptive program of land use assessment and dictates sitespeciflc Best Management Practices(BMPs) for existing developments based on a perceived threat to water quality.A more cost effective alternative may be to solve water quality problems In the receiving waters, Le. start In the water and look upstream at causes that may be contributing (A version of this requirement Is also Included In the Santa Ana Regional Board Tentative Order 01-20). • Permit Includes numeric slung criteria (SUSMPs)as a baseline requirement Instead of allowing the Permittees to revise their existing new development program that has been Implemented since 1997 as they proposed.The permit assumes and mandates that the SUSMP is the Maximum Extent Practicable(MEP) measure Instead of allowing alternative methods of achieving the same results and goats. (A version of this requirement Is also Included In the Santa Ana Regional Board Tentative Order 01-20) Note: Additional comments will be developed regarding the latest version of the Santa Ana permit/n light of the recent changes and the extended comment period recendy authorized by the Regional Baird. Page 1 ACTION STEPS To deliver the"NO AYE VOTE IF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE CUT'message to the Governor and the Legislature there are a number of recommended ACTION STEPS: 1. Election Year Commitments. Next year is an election year and that provides greater leverage with your Legislators and the Governor.Ask for an ironclad commitment to not cast an AYE vote on any budget proposal that cuts local government revenue.That _commitment should be triven no matter what na& ..iecr_„e 130ttP0 Ct:TrF� Leagued California Cities 1400 K Simi Semmmto.CA 95814 916.658.8200 PAX9I6.658.8240 &uer Cities-A[kner Life w ..oxims.urg October 29, 2001 TO: Mayors,Council Members,City Managers,Police Chiefs,Fire Chiefs, Community Services Directors,Finance Directors FROM: Chris McKenzie,Executive Director Dwight Stenbakken,Legislative and Policy Development Director RE: The 2002-2003 State Budget is in Trouble-Start Lobbying NOW!! THE ISSUE The events of September 11,2001,coupled with a cooling economy have placed city revenues in serious jeopardy in the upcoming debate over the 2002-2003 state budget. Observers have been predicting a deficit in the range of$5 to$10 billion. In a meeting this week with legislative leaders,the Governor estimated the deficit between$8 and$14 billion and this estimate assumes the state will sell$12.5 billion in bonds to pay off the general fund costs for purchasing electricity during the recent energy"crisis."The Governor and others have also talked about calling a special session before January to address the budget concerns. The growing budget crisis is real. The most vulnerable city revenue is the state general fand"backfill"for the vehicle license fee(VLF)tax reduction made in 1999. That backfill figure is now$3.7 billion for both cities and counties. Out of this total,approximately$1 billion is direct city revenue. Despite public assurances made to protect local government from any revenue loss from the tax cut,the backfill is being actively considered in scenarios to close the anticipated deficit. An estimate of the amount of vehicle license fee backfiB going to each city and the amount of each city's property tax shift from the early 1990's(i.e., ERAF)is attached to this communication and will serve as background for the message to be delivered and several action steps that we recommend city officials take- NOW!!! Remember,while the VLF is most vulnerable all other revenue sources are also vulnerable. It is our understanding that an ERAF II has already been"floated" as a proposal.Further,there is always the Bradley-Buns,local sales tax that can be manipulated. If the deficit is as great as the Governor predicts,anything can happen. THE MESSAGE The following message should be delivered to Legislators and the Governor's Office: Monthly Update 6 December, 2001 biosolids coordinators throughout the U.S. The NBP web site also contains several links to this information, including hyperlinks from across the U.S. Canadian Biosolids Study Available The Water Environment Association of Ontario (WEAO) initiated the study"Fate and Significance of Selected Contaminants in Sewage Biosolids Applied to Agricultural Land Through Literature Review and Consultation with Stakeholder Groups" in late 1999 as part of an ongoing effort to update and improve the agricultural land application of sewage biosolids in Ontario. Specific objectives of the project were: 1. Review, assess, and summarize information assembled from literature and consultation with credible non-government organizations, farming associations, experts and regulatory agencies (stakeholders) regarding the fate and significance of contaminants in sewage biosolids after they are applied to agricultural lands. 2. Use the information to divide specific contaminants in sewage biosolids into two groups. Group I contaminants have,whereas Group 11 contaminants do not have, sufficient credible scientific information to assure the public that the current agricultural land application program/guidelines are adequate to protect the well being of soils, crops, animals, human health, ground and surface water qualities. 3. Recommend a long-term study program to complete the information gaps and actions that can mitigate any adverse effects that may be caused by the presence of specific contaminants in sewage biosolids. Also, provide comprehensive Terms of Reference for the top 3 studies identified in the long-term study program. 4. Disseminate the study findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and municipalities through report(s) and workshop(s). Major study conclusions and recommendations are summarized for heavy metals, pathogens, trace organics, endocrine disruptors, pharmaceuticals, radionuclides, nitrogen, and phosphorous. To download the report, visit: http://www.weao.org/ NBP Environmental Management System (EMS) Demo Agencies Profiles Available Summaries of the NBP's demonstration agencies biosolids programs are now available for review in the EMS Guidance section of http://www.biosolids.org. Profiles and contact information for 29 current wastewater agencies pilot-testing the environmental management system for biosolids are posted with more to be added in the coming year. Interim final drafts of the Partnership's EMS Blueprint documents and background documents describing the program are also available for review in this section of the web site. Non Sequitur Todos an at mundo sonreimos en la misma lengua." [Everyone in the world smiles in the same language.] Mexican American proverb 1990's enables the state to fund this growth. 2 WAVC> LETTER— Leaque d (afifornia Cities 1400 K Street 4& Sactstnento,CA 95814 916.658.8200 FAX 916.658.8240 Better Cities-A Better Uk �.cacities.org October 29, 2001 TO: Mayors,Council Members, City Managers, Police Chiefs, Fire Chiefs, Community Services Directors,Finance Directors FROM: Chris McKenzie,Executive Director Dwight Stenbakken,Legislative and Polley Development Director RE: The 2002-2003 State Budget is in Trouble- Start Lobbying NOW!! THE ISSUE The events of September 11,2001,coupled with a cooling economy have placed city revenues in serious jeopardy in the upcoming debate over the 2002-2003 state budget. Observers have been predicting a deficit in the range of$5 to$10 billion. In a meeting this week with legislative leaders,the Governor estimated the deficit between$8 and$14 billion and this estimate assumes the state will sell$12.5 billion in bonds to pay off the general fund costs for purchasing electricity during the recent energy"crisis."The Governor and others have also talked about calling a special session before January to address the budget concerns. The growing budget crisis is real. The most vulnerable city revenue is the state general fund"backfiB"for the vehicle license fee(VLF)tax reduction made in 1999. That backfill figure is now$3.7 billion for both cities and counties. Out of this total, approximately$1 billion is direct city revenue. Despite public assurances made to protect local government from any revenue loss from the tax cut,the backfill is being actively considered in scenarios to close the anticipated deficit. An estimate of the amount of vehicle license fee backfill going to each city and the amount of each city's property tax shift from the early 1990's(i.e., ERAF)is attached to this communication and will serve as background for the message to be delivered and several action steps that we recommend city officials take -NOW!!! Remember,while the VLF is most vulnerable all other revenue sources are also vulnerable. It is our understanding that an ERAF H has already been"floated"as a proposal. Further,there is always the Bradley-Burns,local sales tax that can be manipulated. If the deficit is as great as the Governor predicts,anything can happen. THE MESSAGE The following message should be delivered to Legislators and the Governor's Office: Do not cast an AYE vote or sign the 2002-2003 state budget if it contains any cut to city government revenue. The reasons: a State cuts as deep as$3.7 billion will jeopardize police,fire and emergency medical services,the front-line for public safety and homeland protection/response. o With the events of September 11,2001, cities are experiencing increased costs for public safety services. Cities are establishing new services to guard vital public facilities that are vulnerable to terrorist threats(i.e., water supply plants,ports,airports,etc.). A cut of the state backfill for VLF means these protection measures are directly threatened. o Proponents of the vehicle license fee tax cut made public statements and promises to protect local government revenues and services from the tax cut and should be held accountable for those statements. Promises made should be promises kept. o The recession of the early 1990's resulted in severe reductions to non- public safety services. These services are often directly related to community safety and well being(parks,libraries,homeless shelters,etc.). Non-public safety services will again be the hardest hit if the VLF o backfill is eliminated,but safety services are also ieopardized by cuts as deep as$3.7 billion. o City services have not yet recovered from the property tax shift of the early 1990's that inflicted a permanent shift of revenue from local governments to the state. That figure is now over$4 billion on an annual basis. It is a gift from local government to the state general fund that keeps on giving and growing. o Cities have eliminated or postponed vital capital projects in communities. o City services and operations are also affected by the current economic downturn and should not,on top of local hardships, be asked to help bail out state services,AGAIN. Cities have already"given at the office." a State services and personnel have grown at the expense of local services. The property tax revenue shifted from local governments in the early 1990's enables the state to fund this growth. 2 ACTION STEPS To deliver the"NO AYE VOTE IF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE CUT"message to the Governor and the Legislature there are a number of recommended ACTION STEPS: I. Election Year Commitments. Next year is an election year and that provides greater leverage with your Legislators and the Governor.Ask for an ironclad commitment to not cast an AYE vote on any budget proposal that cuts local government revenue. That commitment should be given no matter what park project,police station or other "goodie"is offered to change a mind or two. It only takes 27 people in the Assembly and 14 in the Senate to stop legislative leadership from achieving the two-thirds vote necessary for passage of a budget. 2. The Local Angle. Tranalate the VLF dollar figure for your city into real local programs and cuts. This takes abstract statewide figures and gives them a hometown reality. These figures do not have to be sensationalized to make a point. A cm this size is very real.In response to a proposed budget cut to cities in past years, some city officials asked Legislators to sit in with city councils and deliberate over the cuts in local services in front of the community. Accountability can be a sobering experience. 3. Revise Your Revenue Estimates. Many city finance directors are now doing revisions of revenue estimates based on the economic downturn and the events of September 11,2001. All cities should complete these revenue estimates,especially vulnerable revenues such as the sales tax and the transient occupancy tax. Use this information with Legislators and the media to demonstrate that local services cannot take another revenue grab from the state on top of the deteriorating local revenue picture. 4. Homeland Defense Coats. Since the events of September 11, 2001 city officials are substantially increasing public safety expenditures to bolster homeland defense activities. Cities are providing security to key public facilities such as water supply plants,ports, airports and other public facilities. Please calculate/estimate the costs of these new public safety services and provide that information to Legislators,the media and community groups as an argument against further state cuts. 5. Alert the Media. Translate the cuts in local services to the local media. Couple this story with any cuts or deferment of public facilities made as a result of the last shift of revenue in the early 1990's.The media should also be interested in the growth of state programs and personnel since the last recession compared to local government. State services are growing at the expense of local services. Information comparing state and local expenditures and personnel is attached. 6. Brief Employees and Employee Organizations. Employees and their representatives should be fully briefed on the potential cuts to local government in the 2002-2003 state budget process. If the recession of the early 1990's is any indication, non-public safety employees go first in any economic downturn coupled with a state 3 revenue grab, but public safety employees will also be"at risk"with a cut as large as$3.7 billion. 7. Community Groups and City Services. In each city there are community groups with direct interest in one or many of the local public services. Reach out to these groups and clearly demonstrate the service loss if the state takes the VLF backfill. Legislators are often members of local community groups and you may want to tailor a package of information to that particular group. Keep in mind that many statewide organizations in Sacramento have only loose connections with local offices and may not feel the need to respond,if local offices are not aware of the problem. Your efforts with these local groups can make this a priority with their statewide organizations(i.e.,local chambers of commerce and the State Chamber.). CONCLUSION City officials should begin to take these actions TODAY. Local communities have already endured greater financial setbacks than the state of California through the ballot box and state actions. It is time for the Governor and Legislature to make the hard decisions about service cuts and tax increases that city officials have made for 20 years. Material in this packet can be accessed on the League website: www.cacitics.ore from the front page.The site will also direct members to more material on the password protected portion of the site. Staff Contacts: Telephone Email Dwight Stenbakken (916)658-8213 stenbakdQcacities.org David Jones (916)658-8245 jonesd(alcacities.org Frances Medema (916)658-8218 medentaf(alcacities.org 4 Southern California Chapters of American Public Works Association (APWA) & California Rebuild America Coalition (CALRAC) Invites you to attend a GASB 34 Workshop "Understanding the Realities and Myths of Statement 34" You Will Learn ✓ Are there trends developing? ✓ From experiences of leading agency officials ✓ Practical implementation approaches,tools and techniques ✓ What are others doing and what should I be doing? ✓ Where to access information Program and Panelists O Lessons Learned and Trends by Michael Moreland,Moreland&Associates,Inc.,CPA. Member of National Advisory Committee to GASH on the development of Statement 34 ❑ Lessons Learned by David Bass,Director of Finance,City of Lake Forest ❑ Lessons Learned by Steve Zum,Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Glendale ❑ Extensive question&answer period as well as group participation Who Should Attend Anyone managing budgets and infrastructure assets,including: ✓ city managers ✓ public works officers ✓ facility managers ✓ finance directors ✓ city engineers ✓ maintenance superintendents Date: Thursday, February 28,2002 Time: 9:00 a.m.to 11:30 a.m. Location: City of Santa Fe Springs,City Hall Council Chambers at 11740 Telegraph Road Cost: $50 at the door (Cost Includes lunch at APWXs General Luncheon Meeting at Maggles Pub,which will follow the workshop) Additional Information: contact Gary Dysart/ (714)751-7373 or Kimo Look/(949)580-0195 jTo Register: -Deadline is February 20° (Note Council Chambers seating is limited to 80 people, j please register early) 1 i Option 1) Fax In and Pay At Door- Fill out and fax to 714-545-8883 and pay at door. i i (Please fax this form so we can get a lunch head count) j j Option 2) Mail in Form with Check-Mail in this form with check to:APWA do Psomas; j j Attn:Barbara Russell; 3187 Red Hill Avenue,Suds 250,Costa Mesa, CA 92626 j i 1 i APWA Workshop Registration Form i j Name Tide 1 j Address City statelzip 1 i Agency/Company Member-APWA 1 j Phone Fax Number 1 j 1 4..........................................................................�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.� A fjOq/Q� Serir4EyyN CA�nFor2r..rA ASSocrArroN of InoTWS �SCAt�� SCAQMD Proposed RULE 1133 (Composting Facilities) Status Update— 11127 (Background for December 11 SCAP Board Meeting) SCAQMD has proposed regulation of biosolids and greenwaste c_ omposting_ facilities under the subject rule. The stated concern is ammonia and VOC emissions, precursors to regulated air contaminants. SCAQMD staff has conducted two working group meetings and two rule versions have been released. The general theme of these has been requirements to fully enclose all "active composting;' with ventilation to a biofilter, as well as enclosure of the balance of the operation. A pre-hearing has been scheduled for the February 2002 SCAQMD Governing Board meeting to review cost effective alternatives to the rule, a practice recently instituted by the Board when VOC control measures exceed $13,500 per ton. Ground rules of the hearing have not been established. It appears that the emission data basis used by SCAQMD for the rule is weak at best. Staff does not have a single source test on greenwaste composting facilities, for example, and has only older data on windrow biosolids composting operations. SCAQMD has developed a complicated and expensive laser measurement technique to quantify the average emissions from greenwaste composting, to be tested in the first week of December at Inland Empire Composting. They have been reluctant to conduct side-by-side flux chamber testing that would provide some degree of calibration of this new method. No similar testing has been planned by the SCAQMD to update biosolids composting emissions. The CIWMB has authorized $25,000 to quantify greenwaste composting emissions using flux chambers via contract with C.E. Schmidt, an expert in their use. The scope is to quantify greenwaste composting emissions side-by-side with the SCAQMD laser testing mentioned above. The City of Los Angeles is undertaking a greenwaste composting testing program at two locations with C.E. Schmidt in an attempt to increase the available data. Yvonne Hunter of the California League of Cities has alerted many of the cities to the possible impact of the rule on AB 939 diversion goals. SCAQMD staff has made presentations before the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CI WMB) at their regular meeting in October, before the Los Angeles County Integrated Waste Management Task Force and, most recently, before SCAG. As far as we know, there was no person at the SCAG meeting to represent the wastewater industry. The SCAP Air Quality Committee has assembled an outline of a testing protocol and submitted it to the SCAQMD. This describes testing we believe could demonstrate that well operated aerated static piles can substantially achieve the emissions reductions targeted by the rule, without the use of expensive covering and controls. We estimate it would cost$20,000 to fully flesh out the test protocol and another $80,000 to $100,000 to actually perform the emissions testing, perhaps as far away as Davenport, Iowa. We have been working with a known expert in the field, Dr. Eliot Epstein. CAP MONTHLY UPDATE December, 2001 A Message from the Executive Director... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF A bully pulpit is a great thing— I should know, each month I PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS get the opportunity to speak my sometimes politically Incorrect mind in this space and impart those pearls of wisdom that cause the Editor to get a bit green around the gills about now. But along with the opportunity to blatantly propagandize my viewpoints on the issues facing our industry, I have an obligation to stop and reflect that right now there are men and women who have put themselves in harm's way just so that I can rhapsodize about biosolids, or complain about the Editor's propensity to be right on just about any issue. (Editorial Note: If we're talking percentages, it's close to 99.9%). So this month I would ask that as a community, we send a special holiday message to our men and women in the military Uocomin9 Meetines defending American freedom worldwide. ,s 7 Annual SCAP Holiday Concerns about mail delivery have prompted the military to Luncheon—Tuesday, December 11, suspend this year's annual letter-writing campaign. However, Noon to 2:00 p.m. at the historic El the United States Department of the Navy is providing a private Adobe de Capistrano in San Juan and secure online resource that will allow you to send a Sailor, Capistrano. Marine, Soldier, Airman or Coast Guardsman a holiday email. Go to hfti)://anyservicemember.navy.mil and send one soon. Board Of Director's Meeting— Tuesday,December I 1 at SOCWA in I hope to see all of you at our Holiday Luncheon, but if not, we Dana Point from 9:30— 11:30 a.m. wish you and your agency a violation-free new year! Air Quality Committee—Thursday, I'll leave you with a song whose words and tune are both December 6 at LACSD from I:00— poignant and comforting, 3:00 p.m. TAPS Day is done,gone the sun, The SCAP office will be open from 8 From the hills, from the lake, am— 10:30 am and after the Holiday From the skies. Luncheon on December 1I' for those All is well,safely rest, of you who would like to see our new God is nigh. office. Please stop by(the address is Go to sleep,peaceful sleep, on the bottom of this page) if you May the soldier or sailor, have the time,we would love to see God keep. you! On the land or the deep, Safe in sleep. Love,good night,Must thou go, When the day,And the night Need thee so? All is well. Speedeth all to their rest. Fades the light; and afar Goeth day,and the stars 30200 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE 8•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675- EMAIL: kris(alsovaccoxmall.com•PHONE:(949)489-7676•FAX:(949)489-0150 Monthly Update 2 December, 2001 Shineth bright, Fare thee well; day has gone, Night is on. Thanks and praise,For our days, 'Neath the sun,'Neath the stars, 'Neath the sky, As we go,This we know, God is nigh. Ooh Rahl' Ray Miller WATER ISSUES Mary Jane Forster Foley Reports: Stormwater Permits May Affect POTWs: On November 7, south Orange County POTWs held a meeting with Blake Anderson of Orange County Sanitation District and representatives from the County of Orange to discuss topics of mutual concern. One topic was grease management. The County Dept of Environmental Health reviewed the new regulations of the Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Boards relating to the stormwater permits that are pending and the increased inspections for restaurants. The County was exploring ways that the POTWs could assist in some of the inspections. Another big topic was urban run-off issues and sewage spills. It will be important to continue to discuss the pros and cons of dry weather diversions, collaboration of activities that may overlap like urban run-off and other watershed issues. A future meeting with restaurant representatives was suggested in order to educate them on new grease requirements, cleaning of mats and dumpsters, etc., under the stormwater regulation. Supplementary Environmental Projects: Some Regional Boards are requesting public input on development of a list of SEPs for their regions. If you comment, things to remember: 1)the SEP cannot benefit the discharger—in other words, you can't use projects that are already required under your permits; and 2) provide details in your proposal (need for the project, description of goals, implementation plan, schedule, cost, etc.). Remember, if your agency falls under certain types of enforcement action by a Regional Board and pay fines, you may be able to choose a SEP project in which your funds are used to complete it. If you propose a project not on the list, it will need Regional Board approval. Thanks to Sharon Green and Jose Saez from LACSD for details on this program as proposed by Region 4. 303(d) Hearings This Month San Diego RWQCB (Region 9):The Board is scheduled to hold a public workshop on December a on the region's 303(d) List to be submitted to the SW RCB, beginning at 9:00 a.m., 9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100, San Diego. For information contact Jimmy Smith (858)467-2732; the list is available for review at: http:/hvww.swrcb.ca.aov/—rwgcb9/Procirams/TMDU303d/303d.htmi. Los Angeles RWQCB (Region 4): At the December 13 Board Meeting, staff will discuss the results of the water quality assessment and the recommendations for new 303(d) listings and de-listings based on the results of the assessment. For information, contact Jonathan Bishop (310) 576-6622; the list is at: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb4/htrnVmeetings/TMDU303d-20021303d-2002—list w.html. 'For those that don't recognize the words[ground],this is the battle cry of the United states Marine Corps. Monthly Update 3 December, 2001 Santa Ana RWQCB (Region 8): Staff will present an update of the status of the 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies to the Board at their December 19 meeting. For information contact Hope A. Smythe at (909) 782-4493; the list is available for review at: htto://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwacb8/odf/303d.pdf. EPA Listening Sessions: How Should TMDLs be Defined? In August 2001, EPA extended the TMDL Rule and the 303(d) listing process. As a result of the delay, they decided to tour the U.S. in order to better understand stakeholder perspectives on key issues associated with the TMDL program. EPA will write a new TMDL rule in 2002 and finalize it in 2003. There are five listening sessions being held around the country. Each session has a theme. In December, all issues will be consolidated and discussed in Washington, D.C. The big question is what should EPA do to overcome the problems in the 2000 rule? On November i"and 2n°, EPA came to Sacramento to determine how TMDLs should be defined and identified the following specific issues: • What should the minimum elements of a TMDL be, especially the calculation of waste load allocation and load allocation? • How can waste load allocations and load allocations be calculated quickly for NPDES permits, while balancing longer times needed for stakeholder involvement in identifying non-point measures? • Should TMDLs have different levels of detail for different pollutant-waterbody-source combinations? Over 150 participants were divided into discussion groups to make recommendations on the issues. In general, the group wanted a better listing process. They liked the two-list approach recommended by the National Research Council in July 2001. Specifically, a watch list and an action list. They wanted greater flexibility, better scientific data, no EPA approval of implementation plans, recognition of equivalent state programs and more funding. A summary of the meeting agenda and discussion papers can be found on EPA's web site at www.epa.gov/owow/tmdYmeetings. A full summary of all the comments will be available at the culmination of these sessions. Santa Ana RWQC13 to Hold SSO Workshop Region 8 will hold a public workshop during their December 19 Board meeting at the City of Santa Ana's Civic Center, to review and solicit comments on the proposed draft order"General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies in Orange County within the Santa Ana Region." According to Water Committee Chair Bob Ghirelli, it is likely that this W DR will become the model used to implement California's 'Son of CMOM' regulations. Note: This item is scheduled to be heard after the Orange County Stonnwater Permit Hearing, which is expected to receive a substantial amount of comment from the cities, so the workshop may not begin until the afternoon. For information call Ken Theisen (909)320-2028. Monthly Update 4 December, 2001 . EPA Gives Office of Water Go-Ahead on CMOM mom s.c.1 Wde R.sw=s N.w.r Tracy Mahan,Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water (OWM), has given the go ahead for work to resume on the SSO/CMOM regulations. Last January, work was stopped pending a review. After receiving a number of comments, OWM has been directed to develop an SSO/CMOM that is substantially similar to the one proposed in October 1999, but that incorporates comments received since January 2001. Kevin Weiss of the EPA has been keeping POTWs updated on the status of this issue and promises to keep agencies posted as they develop the revised document. The entire SSO/CMOM document is available for review at the Brown & Caldwell SoCal Water News website at: http:1/204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/emom/cmom—index.htm. Wastewater Security Tapes Now Available (courtesy NBP) Perspectives on Water Infrastructure Security Audio Tapes are now available from the special technical sessions held at WEF's annual conference, October 13 - 17, in Atlanta. These cassette tapes are a transcription of the sessions with an overview of security measures the water/wastewater profession has taken, Informational resources, and the open discussions that took place. Visit: http:/Avww.wef.org/. What Wastewater Utilities Can Do to Guard Against Security Threats Although many wastewater utilities have already taken steps to increase security, an alert has been prepared that provides recommendations and common sense actions to increase security and reduce threats from terrorism. "EPA Water Protection Task Force Alert#IV: What Wastewater Utilities Can Do Now to Guard Against Terrorist and Security Threats" provides actions and recommendations from the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Water Environment Federation, and other leading professional organizations. Areas covered include: guarding against unplanned physical intrusion, making security a priority for employees, coordinating actions for effective emergency response, and investing in security and infrastructure improvement. To view the alert, click on: http://www.wef.org/publicinfo/wwsocudtynow.pdf. Air Source Testing Required for Boilers Above 5 MMBTU/hr According to SCAQMD Rule 1146, boilers greater than 10 MMBTU/hr need to be source tested prior to January 1, 2002. Emissions must be below 30 ppm for NOx and 400 ppm for CO. Boilers greater than 5 MMBTU/hr but less than 10 MMBTU/hr need to meet the same emission limits by July 1, 2002. Thereafter, annual compliance testing is required for boilers over 5 MMBTU/hr. A 20 MGD wastewater treatment plant with digesters may have a 10 MMBTU/hr boiler. Revisions to Coating Regulations San Joaquin Unified APCD, Santa Barbara APCD and Ventura County APCD have adopted the Califomia Air Resources Board's Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings. The San Diego County APCD Public Hearing on the revisions is scheduled for December 12, 2001. The revisions reduce the allowable volatile organic compound limit in industrial maintenance coatings to 250 g/L effective January 1, 2004. SCAP is conducting performance testing of low VOC coatings In response to the SCAQMD Monthly Update 5 December, 2001 amendments of Rule 1113. The study will continue until February 2003. SCAP provided comments to local air districts informing them of the testing program and asking that the results be incorporated into their technology assessments. Tri-TAC Air Committee to Survey Diesel Engines An email survey(with the objective of obtaining an inventory of existing POTW diesel engines)will be distributed by the Tri-TAC Air Committee soon. The inventory will help assess the impact of the California Air Resources Board's (CARB's) Diesel Engine Retrofit Program. The data collected will be used in the lobbying effort and will be submitted to CARB as they requested In a February meeting they had with the Air Committee. The Diesel Retrofit program will require the placement of particulate traps on diesel engines and the use of ultra low sulfur fuel. The cost for the ultra low sulfur fuel is estimated to be 5 cents per gallon higher than current diesel prices. Currently, there are no third-party deliveries of the product. To obtain the fuel, parties must contract directly with the refinery. Blosollds Hazardous Waste Criteria for Mercury-Containing Waste May Change Diane Gilbert of the City of Los Angeles reports that the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)is conducting a series of public workshops on revising hazardous waste criteria for mercury containing wastes— including biosolids. DTSC is contemplating changes to the current criteria that would potentially regulate all mercury-containing wastes; this would effectively list mercury as a hazardous waste. DTSC has prepared a Draft Mercury Report, which presents information, data and national and state regulatory activities regarding mercury. The report is available at the DTSC website: htto://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PublicNoticesfindex.html. The first workshop was held in Sacramento on November 19, with another being scheduled for December 12, 2001, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Ronald Reagan State Building Auditorium, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013. Inland Empire Residuals Management Plan Receives Kudos from EPA The EPA Assistant Administrator for Water, Tracy Mehan, recently sent a letter to the Secretary of Energy, Spencer Abraham, urging him to meet with Inland Empire Utility Agency officials to be briefed on their proposed residuals management plan. Mahan emphasized the positive economics and environmental enhancement benefits that will be realized under the plan, and urged him to support and showcase the program. "With the same dollar invested. . . the organics and biosolids strategy will produce some 50 megawatts of clean renewable electric energy, reduction of air emissions and improvement in air quality, and improvement in water quality and restoration of the groundwater basin." Agencies wishing to know more about IEUA's proposed plan can view it at: http://www.ieua.org/o/organcen/omc.htm Updated State and Regional Biosolids Coordinator List Available (courtesy of the Naaonal Moso9Ea ParberNip) An updated list of all state, regional, and EPA headquarters biosolids coordinators (as of 11-7-01) is available for downloading at http://www.biosolids.org. The list contains all relevant contact information for Monthly Update 6 December, 2001 . biosolids coordinators throughout the U.S. The NBP web site also contains several links to this information, including hypedinks from across the U.S. Canadian Blosolids Study Available The Water Environment Association of Ontario (W EAO) initiated the study`Fate and Significance of Selected Contaminants in Sewage Biosolids Applied to Agricultural Land Through Literature Review and Consultation with Stakeholder Groups' in late 1999 as part of an ongoing effort to update and improve the agricultural land application of sewage biosolids in Ontario. Specific objectives of the project were: 1. Review, assess, and summarize information assembled from literature and consultation with credible non-government organizations, farming associations, experts and regulatory agencies (stakeholders) regarding the fate and significance of contaminants in sewage biosolids after they are applied to agricultural lands. 2. Use the information to divide speck contaminants in sewage biosolids into two groups. Group I contaminants have,whereas Group II contaminants do not have, sufficient credible scientific information to assure the public that the current agricultural land application program/guidelines are adequate to protect the well being of soils, crops, animals, human health, ground and surface water qualities. 3. Recommend a long-term study program to complete the information gaps and actions that can mitigate any adverse effects that may be caused by the presence of specific contaminants in sewage biosolids. Also, provide comprehensive Terms of Reference for the top 3 studies identified in the long-term study program. 4. Disseminate the study findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and municipalities through report(s) and workshop(s). Major study conclusions and recommendations are summarized for heavy metals, pathogens,trace organics, endocrine disruptors, pharmaceuticals, radionuclides, nitrogen, and phosphorous. To download the report, visit: http://www.weao.org/ NBP Environmental Management System (EMS) Demo Agencies Profiles Available Summaries of the NBP's demonstration agencies biosolids programs are now available for review in the EMS Guidance section of htto://www.biosolids.org. Profiles and contact information for 29 current wastewater agencies pilot-testing the environmental management system for biosolids are posted with more to be added in the coming year. Interim final drafts of the Partnership's EMS Blueprint documents and background documents describing the program are also available for review in this section of the web site. Non Sequitur Todos en el mundo sonreimos an Is misma lengua." [Everyone in the world smiles in the same language.] - Mexican American proverb c AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING December 19, 2001 —7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, K necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 1 12/19/01 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made,the minutes for the regular meeting held on November 28, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 11/15/01 11/30/01 Totals $5,299,426.15 $5,899,430.44 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member,there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve a second time extension of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0006, with the City of Huntington Beach. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. i 12/19/01 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re December 5, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 5, 2001 to be filed. C. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart, Garcia and von Langan Engineers to provide engineering services for Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study, Project SP-74, for a total amount not to exceed $80,000. d. Award a contract for Custodial Maintenance Services, Specification No. S-2001-58, to US Metro Group, Inc. for the period of February 4, 2002 through February 3, 2003,for a total contract amount not to exceed $320,000, including four one-year renewal options. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re December 6, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 6, 2001 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$42,921 and a time extension of 355 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $2,672,141. d. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation providing for additional engineering services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76,for an additional amount of $1,764,270, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,114,479. e. (1)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate with the Coast Community College District to establish a joint project agreement to be approved by the Board of Directors in connection with the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate with International Bay Clubs, Inc.for the purchase of real properties located at 1700 to 2000 West Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50. f. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RW Beck, Inc. for design and construction support for Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52; Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-53; Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54; and Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28, 12/19/01 l Page 4 providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$186,105, increasing the total amount not to exceed $685,405. g. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No.J-67, providing for additional engineering services for final design and construction support phases for an additional amount of$735,509, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,132,937. 13. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2001. 14, Approve agreement with California State University of Fullerton for payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in the total amount of$200,000, at the rate of$5,000 quarterly over a period of ten years, in a form approved by General Counsel. 15. Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23,for Purchase Order No. 30761, issued to Mike Priich & Sons for Emergency Repair of Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Line A, Contract No. 5-57,for a total amount not to exceed $1,050,000; and, 2)Approve a change order to Purchase Order No. 30761 issued to Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc.for Emergency Repair of Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Line A, Contract No. 5-57, for an additional amount of $700.000,for a total amount not to exceed $1,750,000. 16. (1)Approve plans and specifications for the Orange-Westem Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid), on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Receive and file request of lowest bidder, Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc.to withdraw bid; (4)Accept the request and allow the withdrawal of Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc.; and (5) Award a contract to Elser Constructors, Inc.for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid), for an amount not to exceed $1,159,999. 17. Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, for an amount not to exceed $1,163,500. 18. a. Actions regarding approving the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5.51: 1. Verbal report by Director of Engineering. 2. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-24, Making Certain Findings Relating To Less Than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 14' Street Pump Station; Approving Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 14'" Street Pump Station;Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 12/19/01 Page 5 b. Approve the purchase of real property located at 1514 West Balboa Blvd., Newport Beach, California from Karen Santaniello, Cynthia Peck, and Steven Peck at an amount not to exceed $405,000; and C. Approve a budget amendment of$405,000 for Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total project budget of$2,616,000. 19. Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to modify the certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report: a. Receive and file Addendum No. 2 for the Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84; b. Receive and file Addendum No. 3 for the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; C. Receive and file Addendum No. 4 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22; and d. Receive and file a Notice of Exemption for the Area Classification Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2. 20. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re December 10, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair Will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 14, 2001 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc.for an additional amount of$369,000, for a total amount not to exceed $35,333,107,for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design for the Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of $184,500. d. Approve Change Order No. 3 to Separation Processes, Inc., Orange County Water District Task Order No. 201301,for an additional amount of$114,665, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,016,075, for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design of membrane systems for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$57,333. e. Approve an Orange County Water District Task Order in an amount not to exceed $143,960 to Howard Almgren for the Howard Almgren team to complete value engineering services at the 70%design level for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,with Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$71,980 each. 12/19/01 Page 6 f. Approve the GWRS Owner Controlled Insurance Program for Workers' Compensation and Excess General Liability with Zurich, for the period December 15, 2001 through February 1, 2006, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares not to exceed $2,942,155. 21. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-16, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04: a. Verbal report of General Manager b. Receive and file written comments, if any C. Open hearing d. Close hearing e. Discussion by Board of Directors f. Recommended actions: 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-16 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-16,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04. 22. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-17,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims or Demands for Payment: a. Verbal report of General Counsel b. Receive and file written comments, if any C. Open hearing d. Close hearing e. Discussion by Board of Directors f. Recommended actions: 12/19/01 Page 7 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-17 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) 2. Motion to adapt Ordinance No. OCSD-17, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims or Demands for Payment 23. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board,the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6,as noted. Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Case No. 01 CC11349 (Government Code Section 54956.9) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 24. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 25. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 26. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for January 23, 2002. 27. Adjournment 12/19/01 Page 8 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or 714 962-2411, ext. 7130 G:\wp.dWaganda\Board Agendas\2001 Board Agendas\121901 aganda.doc V Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001 OJN� SANiTgr�oy 4 � Q � � h ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 ' 11/28/01 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on November 28, 2001, at 7:00 p.m.,in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS A Norman Z Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo A Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Guy Camozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer John M. Gullixson X Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley A Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff A Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Ryal Wheeler; Jeff Armstrong; Dave Heinz; Mike Moore; Kevin Hadden; Chuck Hodge; Mike McCarthy; Michelle Hetherington; Mark Esquer OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Mike Moreland; Greg Giles; Kris Hardeman; Chris Roberts; Irwin Haydock; Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Terry Lane; Susan Lindquist; Larry Porter; Sava Nediz Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 n 11/28/01 PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver: Larry Porter, Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Kris Herdsman. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Vice Chairman Green requested those Directors who would not be able to attend the December 1 go Board Meeting due to the League of Cities annual meeting to ask their alternates to attend. He then announced that the FAHR Committee meeting would be meeting on Wednesday, January 9, 2002. There would not be a FAHR meeting in December. He also reported the Steering Committee would not meet in December. It was announced that two awards had been received from the Santa Ana River Basin Section of the California Water Environment Association. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance then recognized Dave Heinz for presentation of the Large Plant of theYear award, and Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, recognized Chuck Hodge for the Engineering Achievement award for the design of the primary clarifiers at Plant No. 1. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, recognized employee Jeff Armstrong, and congratulated him for obtaining his doctorate degree in biological oceanography. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L.Woodruff reported that the matter of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership has been dismissed. CWDLP had filed two separate cases and one was set for trial this month, however CWDLP filed for dismissal of its own case. The court will render the decision of the second case, a Writ of Mandate, in early December. A hearing was held on this issue November 20. It is a very important case because CWDLP is challenging the validity of the District's connection fees and capital facilities capacity charges ordinance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held October 24, 2001 be deemed approved, as mailed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 11/28/01 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/01 10/31/01 Totals $4,833,034.36 $7.187,723.20 Director Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 39297. Director Leyes abstained. CONSENTCALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file petition from Cornelius Marinescu requesting annexation of 0.688 acres to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Old Ranch Road in the City of Anaheim; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-22, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD -21 Marinescu Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a second time extension of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0001,with the City of Cypress. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Sewer Service and Connection Agreement with the City of La Mirada and Centex Homes for connection of 132 single-family homes and one commercial lot within a 52.43 acre development (Tract No. 52721), in the City of La Mirada within the County of Los Angeles, providing for payment of equivalent annexation acreage fees and for payment of connection fees as the development progresses, in a form approved by General Counsel. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Green, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the November 28, 2001 meeting. Committee Vice Chair Green reported that the October 24, 2001 Minutes were not approved due to a lack of quorum. The Minutes will be considered at the January committee meeting. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 e 11/28/01 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the November 7, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 7, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Cyclus Envirosystems, Inc. for the Anoxic Gas Flotation Process Demonstration, providing for project delay-related expenses for an additional amount of$40,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $390,000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To amend the motion to authorize the General Manager to deposit into an escrow account (ADAM431)with First American Tide Company$15,500 per month, for three months,for lost opportunity compensation, in order to extend the escrow during the performance of due diligence on the Inland Composting and Organic Recycling site. Director Kawashima abstained. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson, Vice Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the November 1, 2001 meeting. The Vice Chair then ordered the corrected draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 1, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Accept Dust Collection Systems for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Carpenter Shops, Job No. SP19980034R, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. to provide engineering services for the Gisler- Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach B, Contract No. 7-37, for a total amount not to exceed $336,880. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers for additional construction support services for Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46,for an additional amount of$52,721, for a total amount not to exceed $265,839. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 ' 11/28/01 f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$198,578 for Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement, Job No. J-714, for a total project budget of$1,310,578; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Consulting Services Agreement, Specification No. P-189, with CH2M Hill, Inc. for additional engineering services for the Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement, Job No. J-71-4, for an additional amount of$198,578, increasing the total amount not to exceed $683,578. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 1 with Water 3 Engineering for the final design phase of Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, subject to approval by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2001. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget amendment of $320,000 for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid), for a total project budget of$1,650,000 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the October 10, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held October 10, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 2001. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the First Quarter Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2001. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2001 through September 30, 2001. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 2001, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Select Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG)and authorize the General Manager to enter into a consultant agreement with PRAG for a three-year period for the 2001-02 fiscal year, with an option of extending the service period for an additional two-year period upon Board approval. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 11/28/01 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-23, Fixing and Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the District, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-02. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Upgrade the following five positions that were approved in the FY 01/02 Budget: • One Senior Human Resources Analyst upgraded to a Human Resources Supervisor in Division 510 • One Plant Operator position upgraded to a Senior Plant Operator position in Division 830 • One Senior Mechanic position upgraded to a Maintenance Supervisor in Division 850 • One Programmer position upgraded to an IT Supervisor position in Division 930 • One Project Specialist position upgraded to an IT Strategic Implementation Leader in Division 940 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Donahue, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on November 14, 2001. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 22, 2001 to be filed. 16. Ordinance No. OCSD-16, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04: b. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-16 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-16, and pass to second reading and public hearing on December 19, 2001. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Early Retirement Incentive Agreement with Orange County Employees Retirement System in connection with Ordinance No. OCSD-16. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 11/28/01 17. Ordinance No, OCSD-17, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims or Demands for Payment: b. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-17 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-17, and pass to second reading and public hearing on December 19, 2001. 18. There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. /Lb Secretary of foe Board of i ectors of Orange County Sanitatio istrict Gawp.dW%genda\BmM Min W02001 Bmrd MlnuteMN 12801 minuteM.doc Claims Paid From 10I01I01 to 10I15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrards 39046 Kydkset Corporation 65.338.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39047 Orange County Sanitation District 460,404.76 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 39048 Palnewebber Incorporated 41,018.63 COP Remarketing Agreement 39049 RossmeorA.os Alamitos Area Sewer Dist. 53.890.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73 39050 Southern California Edison 87,261.69 Power 39051 First American Title Company 30,500.00 Escrow Deposit-Biosolids Management Site Acquisition 39052 A.B.I.At.I.P.Attorney Service 87.63 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 39053 American Airlines 3,014.00 Travel Services 39054 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2.014.09 Long Distance Telephone Service 39065 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 77.56 Telephone Service 39056 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 5,351.35 Cellular Telephone Service 39057 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 39058 Bloomberg L.P. 4,472.91 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93 39059 BAF Industries 9,109.05 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39060 California Chassis, Inc. 2.795.91 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39061 California Trailer Perk 694.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39062 Chmma Systems Partners 7,506.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39063 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,731.59 Copier Lease 39064 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment IT X 39065 Compu Master 199.00 Information Technology Training Registration = 39066 Cornsolldated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 672.83 Electrical Supplies DO39067 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 167.63 Plumbing Supplies 1 39068 CR&R,Inc. 030.00 Container Rentals D 39069 CWEA 65.25 Publication 39070 CWFA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 39071 Econolite Control Products Inc. 11,419.33 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39072 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 39073 State Board of Equalization 816.09 State Tax 39074 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 39075 City of Fullerton 404.83 Water Use 39076 Larry Green 1,117.35 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39077 Voided Check - - 39078 Jack Hale 82.56 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39079 Voided Check - - 39080 Bemire HIM 1,117.35 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39081 City of Huntington Beach 27.49 Water Use 39082 Industrial Metal Supply 1.040.41 Metal 39083 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,516.86 Dues Deduction 39084 IC Myers Properties,Inc. 6,676.80 Reconcillatlon User Fee Program 39085 George Kierade 1.123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39086 MwVac Electronics 26.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39087 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 13,095.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 39088 Voided Check - - 39089 Nlagra Plumbing 550.27 Plumbing Supplies 39090 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amourd Description 39091 OCEA 458.12 Dues Deduction 39092 Pacific Bell 43.39 Telephone Services 39093 Pacific Bell 65.08 Telephone Services 39094 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 39095 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 39095 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 39097 Pead Art&Craft 22.09 Art&Graphic Supplies 39098 Rose Pelous 1,123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39099 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,424.90 Lab Supplies 39100 Gene Roseman 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39101 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 39102 Sparkletts 2,214.07 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 39103 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. 394.06 Mechanical Supplies 39104 Ultra Scientific 8.00 Freight 39105 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 39106 Vedzon Calffomia 1,300.73 Telephone Services 39107 VWR Scfentlfic Products Corporation 328.90 Lab Supplies 39108 W.D.Proof Company 3.327.81 Reconciliation User Fee Program 39109 Vokled Check - - 39110 WEF 112.00 Membership-Water Emironment Federation X 39111 The Yakima Company 21,07324 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 = 39112 David P. Halverson 818.64 Meeting/fralning Expense Reimbursement 39113 Randy E. Harris 110.06 Meefingrrraming Expense Reimbursement W 39114 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1.050.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration --1 39115 Lenora Crane and Gateway 2,148.30 Employee Computer Loan Program D 39116 American Machinery&Blade, Inc. 30.611.99 (1)Piranha Hydraulic Ironworker Model P90,Table&Mechanical Supplies 39117 Black&Veatch Corporation 77.535.70 Engineering Services J-71-3,J-77 39118 Blue Cross of California 223,98257 Medical Insurance Premium 39119 Carollo Engineers 54.045.78 Engineering Services P2-60,P2-66&J-25-4 39120 City of Garden Grove 157.782.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73 39121 Cydus Envirosyslems, Inc 32,000.00 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 39122 Environmental Tracing Systems Ltd. 55,157.00 (1)EcoTrace Fluorescent Tracer 39123 Kemiron Padfic,Inc. 88,690.41 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 39124 Mac:Analytical System 34.030.00 Professional Services J-85 39125 Mid-West Associates 25.953.38 Pump&Pump Pads 39126 Orange County Water District 306.217.85 Construction J-36(GW RS) 39127 Pioneer Americas,Inc 58,300.64 Caustic Soda 39128 Pdydyne.Inc. 43,327.09 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 39129 Projects Partners 96.734.53 Temporary Employment Services 39130 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 75,077.50 Construction-Emergency Sewer Repairs-Huntington Beach 39131 Science Applications In6.,Corp. 83.087.59 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 39132 Taylor-Dunn Manufaduring 97.639.93 (14)Electric Cans 39133 Tran Consulting Engineers 161,153.00 Engineering Services 1-2-4,1-17,5-46&7-21 39134 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 122,819.83 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 39135 The Yakima Company 59.308.73 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 10101101 to 10115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39136 Jamison Engineering Contract=,Inc. 46,167.29 Construction 241-2 39137 Ken Thompson,Inc. 241.888.00 Construction 546 39138 Accuthe Fasteners,Inc. 156.47 Mechanical Supplies 39139 Acoplan Technical Company 1,608.02 Electrical Supplies 39140 Action Instruments clo CFM-SF,Inc. 3,157.03 Instrument Parts&Supplies 39141 Advanced Calibration Designs,Inc. 3,620.00 Instrument Pans&Supplies 39142 Air Liquids America Corp. 794.59 Specialty Gasses 39143 Air Products&Chemicals 339.18 Lab Supplies 39144 Airgas Safety 1,378.70 Safety Supplies 39145 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 414.31 Manhole Frames&Covers 39146 American Chemical Society 985.00 Lab Training Registration 39147 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 175.00 Lab Supplies 39148 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 600.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 39149 Appleone Employment Service 8.134.49 Temporary Employment Services 39150 Arens Industries,Inc. 6.465.00 Instrument Supplies 39151 Ashbrook Corporation 2.283.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39152 Battery Specialties 611.08 Batteries 39153 Bauer Compressors 8,288.78 Safety Supplies&Equipment 39154 Blair-Martin Co.,Inc. 196.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39155 Body Therapeutics 120.67 Safety Supplies X 39156 Boot Sam 64.49 Reimbursable Safety Shoes = 39157 Breaker Supply 2,365.00 Electrical Pans&Supplies 39158 Brown&Caldwell 12,337.13 Engineering Service 241 39159 Bush&Associates,Inc. 2,020.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 D 39160 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 194.17 Safety Supplies 39161 California Auto Collision 771.10 Vehicle Repairs 39162 Calpico,Inc. 111.18 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39163 Camfil Farr Sales 450.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39164 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 2,429.60 Engineering Services-Sewer Map Maintenance 39165 Camllo Engineers 2,080.98 Engineering Services-Blosolids Management 39166 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 16,154.75 Engineering Services P2-82 39167 Certified Truck Bodies 21,569.38 (1)2-Ton 84"Custom Service Truck Body,Bed Liner&Misc.Equipment 39168 Chromate Industrial Corp. 401.31 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Tools 39169 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 263.81 Computer Maim.Agreement 39170 Computers America, Inc. 540.02 Computer Supplies 39171 Connection Technology Center,Inc. 1.553.81 Instrument Parts&Supplies 39172 Consolidated Elect.Distdbutms,Inc. 1.278.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39173 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 115.94 Plumbing Supplies 39174 Cooper Energy Services 236.45 Engine Supplies 39175 Cornerstone Management Consulting 500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 39176 Corporate Express 008.27 Office Supplies 39177 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 14,255.31 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 39178 Cort Furniture Rental 752.48 Office Furniture 39179 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 3,069.75 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39180 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,178.19 Maintenance Agreement-Repainvinstallallon of Base,Handheld&Vehlcle Radios 39181 County Wholesale Electric Co. 7,615.10 Electrical Parts&Supplies&Computer Hardware Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39182 Cane America Services,Inc. 2.400.00 Crane Services 39183 Cylec Industries 15,724.30 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.0798-18 39184 CW EA-SARBS,Inc. 180.00 O 8 M Meeting Registration 39185 CWEA-TCP 33.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 39186 Damewood'ConsuWng Group 150.00 Safety 8 Emergency Response Meeting Registration 39187 Del Mar Analytical 315.00 Biosollds Analysis 39188 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 9,836.20 (4)Printers 39189 Della Packaging Products, Inc. 200.72 Lab Supplies 39190 Detection Instruments Corporation 3,265.82 Instrument Parts 8 Supplies 39191 DeZurik c/o MIscc/ScuthWest 8,579.31 Valves 39192 Dionex Corporation 526.90 Lab Supplies 39193 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 1,200.00 On-slle Software Installation 8 Training 39194 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 131.54 Pahl Supplies 39195 DDB Engineering,Inc. 8,520.00 Temporary Employment Services 39196 DLT Solutions,Inc. 17,440.80 AutoCAD Map Software Upgrade 8 Subscription 39197 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 68.59 Electrical Supplies 39198 Enchanter,Inc. 800.00 Ocean Monitoring MD 5.24-95 39199 Environmental Resource AssociagonfERA 1,288.70 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 39200 EqulpCo 876.61 Instrument Maim. 39201 EvA g Irrigation Industrial 458.30 Irrigation Parts 8 Supplies rT1 39202 E)press Office Environment 263.65 Once Equipment = 39203 ESRI,Inc. 1,200.00 Engineering Training Registration 39204 FedEx Corporation 84.45 Air Freight Do 39205 Filler Supply Company 613.74 Filters —1 39206 First American Real Estate Solutions 423.88 Orange County Property Information D 39207 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,565.78 Lab Pans 6 Supplies 39208 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company 20.631.75 Long Tom Disability Ins.Premium 39M Fountain Valley Camera 15.86 Photo Supplies 39210 Franklin Covey 106.17 Once Supplies 39211 Fry's Electronics 386.91 Computer Supplies 39212 FLW.Inc. 507.85 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies 39213 G.T.Hall Company 106.43 Electrical Equipment Service 39214 Ganehl Lumber Company 325.08 Lumber/Hardware 39215 Garland Manufacturing Co. 796.78 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 39216 Ganati-Callahan Company 2,813.16 Chemicals 39217 George Yardley Co. 2.412.30 Lab Supplies 39218 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,828.86 Bell Filter Press Supplies 39219 Gold Systems,Inc. 15,820.00 Prof.Services-Develop 5 Implement Data Migration 8 STORET Interface Application 39220 Golden West Machine,Inc. 6,112.29 Repairs 8 Maintenance Service-Hoffman Blower 39221 Government Finance Officers Association 50.00 Subscription 39222 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,OB8.30 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 39223 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 371.78 Janitorial Supplies 39224 Edwards Systems Technology 64.50 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 39225 GST,Inc./Micro City 105.52 Lab Supplies 39226 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,566.07 Plumbing Supplies 39227 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 2.493.94 Engine Generator Control Supplies Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39228 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 23.00 Meeting Expenses 39229 Hilli,Inc. 1.738.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39230 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 854.93 Compressor Parts 39231 Home Depot 124.54 Small Hardware 39232 Hopkins Technical Products 5,789.91 Pump Supplies 39233 Horizon Technology 402.20 Lab Pans&Supplies 39234 Human Resource Executive 89.95 Subscription 39235 Hunts'Flnal Phase 4,255.00 Construction-Lab Library Floor Repairs 39236 Idexx 6.45 Lab Supplies 39237 Imaging Plus,Inc. 2.417.24 Printing Servioa 39238 Impact Training Services 1,196,00 O&M Training Registration 39239 Industrial Distribution Group 22,858.14 Tools&Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39240 Inside EPA 650.00 Subscription 39241 Intratek Computer,Inc. 330.00 Professional Services-Network Support 39242 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,813.59 Instrument Supplies 39243 Inwreys Systmes,Inc. 598.55 Instrument Supplies 39244 Irvine Ranch Water District 7.08 Water Use 39245 IMRI 4.345.00 Temporary Employment Services 39246 J&B Auto Pans 111.17 Auto Parts&Supplies 39247 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3.041.60 Misc.Construction-Manhole Repairs at Katella&Main,Orange 171 X 39248 Jays Catering 303.49 Meeting Expenses a: 39249 John's Philly Grille 178.55 Meeting Expense-J-71-3 Do39250 Johnstone Supply 135.01 Electrical Supplies Do 39251 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc 2,443.87 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 D 39252 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,425.25 FIS Support Services 39253 KOFlo Corporation 1.319.99 (1)KOFlo Static Mixer 39254 Lab Support 5,327.49 Temporary Employment Services 39255 La Motte Chemical Products 99.17 Chemicals 39256 League of California Cities 575.00 Membership 39257 Lee&Ro,Inc. 5,777.36 Engineering Services Various Projects PI-93 39258 Lexls-Nerds 49.12 Books&Publications 39259 Gerald R.Jones 8,960.57 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 39260 Long Beach Uniform Co., Inc. 1,300.16 Unhomrs 39261 Luca's 115.00 Meeting Expense 39262 Maintenance Technology Corp. 592.25 Metal 39263 Manad,Phelps It Phillips,L.L.P. 5,OD0.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 39264 MarVac Electronics 28.38 ElecWcal Paris&Supplies 39205 Measurement Variables, Inc. 992.02 Hankinson Refrigerated Compressed Air Dryer 39266 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1.052.19 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 39267 Medlin Controls Co. 3,224.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39268 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5,765.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 39269 Milllmnics,Inc. 2,068.36 Electrical Supplies 39270 Milloonics rJo RMB Engineering 3.516.14 Electrical Supplies 39271 Mission Uniform Service 3,776.93 Uniform Rentals 39272 Mitchell Instrument Co. 881.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39273 Moreland&Associates 3.310.80 Auditing Services MO 3.8-95 - Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39274 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 24.705.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 39275 MCR Technologies,Inc. 330.65 Electrical Pam 8 Supplies 39276 MI Services Group,Inc. 12,000.00 Professional Services-On-site Training Business Objects 39277 National Micro xxnp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 39278 National Plant Services, Inc. 8,400.00 Vacuum Truck Services 39279 Neal Supply Co. 342.87 Plumbing Supplies 39280 Nickey Petroleum Go., Inc. 2.056.27 Lubricant/Dkxmi Fuel 39281 Norms Refrigeration 70.44 Electric Pam 39282 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 211.90 Steel Tags 39283 NETSOL/Network Solution 2,100.00 Security System-Update Documentation 39284 Office Depot Business Services Div. 822.81 Office Supplies 39285 OneSoume Distributors,Inc. 155.77 Electrical Pam 8 Supplies 39286 Optio Software,Inc. 7,280.83 Prof.Sam.-Doc.Design 8 Knowledge Transfer for Design Studio 8 Reprint Software 39287 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,450.00 Repair 8 Maintenance Services 39288 Oxygen Service Company 317.94 Specialty Gases 39289 COB Reprographics 3,977.04 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 39290 OCE-USA,Inc. 331.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 39291 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 169.64 Fillers 39292 Pacific Bell Internal Services 324.00 Internet Service 39293 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,332.89 Plumbing Pam 8 Supplies X39294 Parker Hannifin Corporation 391.00 Mechanical Supplies = 39295 Parkhouse Tire Co. 711.33 Tires Do39296 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 3,424.23 Engineering Services J-35-2 Do 39297 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 9,849.00 Construction-Lateral Sewer Repairs at Charmaln St.,Orange 39298 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 299.52 Lob Supplies D 39299 PlnnacleOne Institute 750.00 Engineering Training Registration 39300 Pon Supply 43.00 Rope 39301 Power Measurement Limited 2,342.65 Electrical Pam 8 Supplies 39302 Power Bros.Machine.Inc. 875.00 Mechanical Maintenance-Hi-Rate Mixer Pump 39303 Primary Source 3.612.63 Office Furniture 39304 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 1,777.74 Repairs 6 Maintenance-Tank Monitor 39305 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 24.57 Plumbing Supplies 39308 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 39307 R.L.Abbott 8 Associates 4.000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 39308 R.A.Reed Electric 3,147.44 Repairs 8 Maintenance-ABB Motor 39309 Regents of Univ.of California 2,470.18 Professional Services J-85,Phase III 39310 Reliastar 18,760.78 Employee Medical Health Premium 39311 Roto Rooter-N.O.CXI 1 1,857.50 Sewer Line Repair 39312 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 81.68 Videos 39313 Ryan Herod Products Corp. 390.58 Mechanical Equipment 39314 RPM Electric Motors 2,485.18 Repairs 8 Maintenance-GE 200 HP Motor 39315 RS Hughes Co.Inc. 172.10 Paint Supplies 39316 Schwirg America.Inc. 2.749.65 Pump 8 Pump Supplies 39317 Sears Industrial Sales 30.67 Mechanical Supplies 39318 Seaventures 11,100.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 39319 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,327.20 Concrete Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39320 Shepherd Machinery Co. 284.06 Truck Supplles 39321 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,783.62 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39322 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 183.89 Lab Supplies 39323 So.Cal.Gas Company 19.163.69 Natural Gas 39324 Society for HR Management 180.00 Membership 39326 SollChoice 3,487.22 Software 39326 Southern California Edison 2,373.33 Power 39327 Strata Intemational,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 39328 Summit Steel 91.31 Metal 39329 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,149.53 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 39330 SARBS 740.OD Engineering and O 8 M Training Registration 39331 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc 39332 SETAC 610.00 Compliance Training Registration 39333 SPEC Services,Inc. 5.406.14 Engineering Services J-33-1 39334 SWRCB Accounting Office 40D.00 Waste Discharge Requirements Permit Fee 39335 Teledyne Analytical 406.35 Instrument Pads 39336 The Lewis Group 6,445.28 Consulting Service-Project Management Process 39337 The Orange County Register 581.76 Notices 8 Ads 39338 Thermo Spectronic 662,50 Maintenance Services-Lab Equipment 39339 Osprey Marine Management 3,340.00 Professional Services J-85 k39340 Time Warner Communication 4OA7 Cable Services = 39341 The Trans Company 366.77 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 39342 Tropical Plana Nursery, Inc. 8,960.81 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 DO DO 39343 Truk 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 40.03 Truck Supplies D 39344 Truesdail Laboratories,Inc. 2,497.00 Lab Services 39345 Teksystems 11.825.00 Temporary Employment Services 39346 TRW EMC/Calibragon Services 487.00 Certification of Primary Thermometers in Lab 39347 U.S.News Specialty Marketing 23.90 Publication 39348 Ultra Scientific 88.71 Lab Supplies 39349 Underground Service Alen of So.Calif. 300.00 Contractual Services 39350 The Unlsource Corporation 213.12 Office Supplies 39351 United Parcel Service 62.49 Parcel Services 39352 Universal Specialties, Inc. 246.18 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies 39353 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 5,200.00 Temporary Employment Service 39354 Vapex,Inc. 11,317.05 Pump Supplies 8 Maintenance 39355 Verimn California 1,256.56 Telephone Services 39356 Vortax Industries,Inc. 1.588.00 Door Maintenance Services 39357 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 21,948.84 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 39358 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,590.22 Lab Parts B Supplies 39359 The Wackenhut Corporation 2.214.00 Security Guards 39360 Waxie Sanitary Supply 538.46 Janitorial Supplies 39361 Weather B Wind Instrument Co. 511.93 Wind Sock 39362 Western Switches 8 Controls,Inc. 7,890.09 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 39363 WEF 336.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 39364 Xerox Corporation 12,143.55 Copier Leases 39365 Yellowstone,Technologies.Inc. 11,312.50 Professional Services-FIS Phase II Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/01/01 to 10115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39366 Zymark Corporation 362.47 Lab Supplies 39367 Olsson Construction.Inc. 10.819.00 Construction J-52 39368 Nicholas J.Artiontes 368.98 Meetingri-mining Expense Reimbursement 39369 Marc A.Brown 1,481.64 Tempomry Employment Service 39370 Stephan J.Bunill 338.65 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 39371 Frank Chavez 255.65 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 39372 Philip F.Cordova 375.73 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 39373 Martin G.England 1,481.64 Meeting?reining Expense Reimbursement 39374 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 1,565.83 Meeting/frsining Expense Reimbursement 39375 David A.Ludwin 497.77 Meetingr7rsining Expense Reimbursement 39376 James,Jr.Spears 378.98 Meetingrframing Expense Reimbursement 39377 Employee Activity Committee 700.00 Service Award Expense 39378 Wild Rivers Waterpark 1.212.00 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 39379 U.S.Post Master 1,080.00 Postage for Public Outreach Newsletters Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.726.252.77 Payroll Disbursements 24438-24546 Employee Paychecks $ 165.891.58 Biweekly Payroll 10/03/01 24547-24548 Interim Paychecks 10,013.01 Termination Paychecks 65435-65884 Direct Deposit Statements 766.858.16 Biweekly Payroll 10/03/01 X Total Payroll Disbursements $ 942,762.75 2 W Wim Transfer Pamen Chase � C Bank of Texas E 97,519.84 Societe Generale September Swap Payment on 1993 Ceni0cates W Participation D Chase Bank of Texas 66,499.00 September Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wim Transfer Payments $ 164,018.84 Total Claims Paid 10101/01 .10115101 $ 4.833.034.36 Page 8 of 8 -' Claims Paid From 10/16101 to 10/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount I Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 39380 American Express $ 35,999.31 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies 8 Services 39381 AMSA 25,016.00 Membership-Assoc.of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies 39382 Abesco 181.18 Hardware 39383 Alrgas Safety 1,184.82 Safety Supplies 39384 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Co. 43.01 Telephone Service 39385 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 787.79 Plumbing Supplies 39386 CSMFO(Calif.Soc.Of Mun.Finance Officinal 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 39387 Dawson Company 804.80 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39388 Ecology Tire,Inc. 304.00 Waste Management-Tires 39389 George Naddour 1,732.08 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39390 Harrington Ind.Plastics 759.31 Plumbing Supplies 39391 Industrial Metal Supply 153.36 Metal 39392 Irvine Rench Water District 118.25 Water Use 39393 IBM Corp. 275.94 IBM AS1400 Mainl. 39394 Chandra R.Manlecon 211.05 Meetingfrralning Expense Reimbursement 39395 MarVac Electronics 25.16 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 39396 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 831.82 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39397 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 50.00 Compliance Meeting Registration m 39398 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 799.25 Fillings X 39399 Reliasar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,205.02 Life Insurance Premium,Short-Term Disability 8 Cancer 2 39400 Rupee Hydraulics 4.058.53 Pump 8 Motor W 39401 PIS Hughes Co.,Inc. 108.51 Paint Supplies -1 39402 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 82.30 Paint Supplies 03 39403 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1.033.07 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 39404 So.Cal.Gas Company 7,243.83 Natural Gas 39405 BARBS 555.00 Operations Training Registration 30406 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,336.13 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39407 Verizon California 98.47 Telephone Services 39408 Water Environment Federation 155.00 Publication 39409 Juan J.Ambr¢ 283.44 Meetirgri mining Expense Reimbursement 39410 James L.Bunor 359.18 Meetingr7raining Expanse Reimbursement 39411 Patrick M.Carrillo 239.32 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 39412 George A.Cheretle 203.11 Meeting/Talning Expense Reimbursement 39413 Pater Chaffs 264.95 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 39414 Thomas D.Dodderer 237.54 Meelingfrmining Expense Reimbursement 39415 John B. Falkenstein 365.15 Meeling/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 39418 Michael J.McCusker 481.72 Meeting?relning Expense Reimbursement 39417 William F. Pierce 230.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39418 Michael Vuorg 241.33 Meetingri'mining Expense Reimbursement 39419 Ronald L.Wade 289,88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30420 Robyn A.Wilcox 321.69 Meefing,"Imining Expense Reimbursement 39421 David M.Yager 224.22 Meefingri mining Expense Reimbursement 39422 Bales Chica Conservancy 50.00 Administration Meeting Registration 39423 Orange County Sanitation District 21,081.03 Workers Comp.Relmb. 39424 Orange County Sanitation District 530.22 Petty Cash Relmb. Page 1 of 12 Claims Paid From 10/16/01 to 10/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39425 Orange County Sanitation District 456,120.78 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 39428 Court Order 628.20 Wage Garnishment 39427 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 39428 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 39429 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 39430 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1.502.55 Dues Deduction 39431 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 39432 OCEA 487.37 Dues Deduction 39433 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 39434 Court Order 296,00 Wage Garnishment 39435 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 39436 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 39437 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 39438 Air Products 8 Chemicals 25,039.17 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8-89 39439 Black&Veatch Corporation 240,696.79 Engineering Services Pt-76 39440 Boyle Engineering Corporation 54.220.66 Engineering Services 1-2-4,2.31,2-50 8 6-13 39441 BP Energy Company 145,425.29 Natural Gas-Spec. No.9900-28 39442 Delta Daniel 51.284.58 Dental Insurance Plan 39443 EA Du Pont De Nemours and Company 168,044.00 Painting Malnl.Services MO 4.22.98 rrr 3"" Johnson 8 Associates,L.L.C. 36.138.35 Professional Services-Compensation 8 Classification Study k 39445 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33.226.80 Medical Insurance Premium = 39448 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 60.427.25 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 W 39447 MasTec Network Services 32,055.20 Communication Equipment Upgrade 39448 Mec Analytical System 34.769.42 ProiaSSIonel Services-Toxicity Analysis J-85 W 39449 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 216.562.00 Water Use E10ciency Program MO 9.22-99 39450 Olsson Construction,Inc. 41,047.00 Construction J-52 39451 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 112,773.63 Engineering Services J-42 39452 Polydyne,Inc. 35.516.62 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 39453 Southern California Edison 83244.66 Power 39454 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 105,667.28 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 39455 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 108,158.04 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 39458 Woodruff,Spradlln 8 Smart 84,718.13 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 39457 The Yakima Company 60,041.49 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 39458 Adams/Mallory Construction Co..Inc. 79,729.73 Construction J-80 39459 J W Contracting Corporation 38.905.00 Construction P2-60 39460 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 71.643.61 Construction 2-41.2 39461 Margate Construction, Inc. 217,966.42 Construction J-71.1,J-71.2 8 P2-39 39462 MVP Commercial,Inc. 48.870.00 Construction-Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services 39463 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 37,777.41 Construction P146-2 8 J-53 39464 Urbarsec Engineering,Inc. 166.500.00 Construction J-66 39465 Aco site Fasteners.Inc. 64.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39466 Great American Printing Go. 1.946.29 Stationery,Office Supplies 8 Printing 39467 Airborne Express 41.29 Air Freight 39468 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,064.25 Safely Videos 39469 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 80.00 Lab Supplies 39470 Anthony Past Cordrol,Inc. 295.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control Page 2 ct 12 Claims Paid From 10/16101 to 10131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39471 Appleone Employment Service 2,638.68 Temporary Employment Services 39472 Applied Industrial Technology 1.242.32 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39473 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 1,000.00 Toxicity Testing 39474 Artistic Blinds 128.48 MIN Blinds&Installation 39475 Awards&Trophies By Bea 29.34 Plaques 39476 AMSA 675.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 39477 APEM 80.00 O&M Meeting Registration 39478 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 167.18 Telephone Service 39479 AWSI 133.00 Dept.of Transportation Training Program-Advanced Workplace Strategies 39480 Donald or Patricia Barnum 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39481 Be"Commercial Door Repair,Inc. 4,008.00 Door Repairs&Maintenance Services 39482 Bauer Compressors 117.38 Safely Supplies&Equipment 39483 BloMerieux Vitek,Inc. 554.73 Lab Supplies 39484 Borthwick,Guy,Beltenhausen 14.790.69 Professional Services P2.84 39485 Breaker Supply 161.25 Electrical Pans&Supplies 39486 Cal-Glass,Inc. 331.11 Lab Equipment Service 39487 California Automatic Gate 1,113.63 Service Agreement-Automatic Gates at Pit. l B Pit.2 39488 California Relocation Services,Inc. 270.00 Office Moving Services 39489 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 300.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 r11 39490 California Water Awareness Campaign 2002 600.00 Sponsorship = 39491 Cameron Welding Supply 201.94 Welding Pans&Supplies 39492 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 5,690.00 Professional Services-Sewer Map Maintenance at 39493 Cad Warren&Co. 334.41 Insurance Claims Administrator --1 39494 Carpet Wagon, Inc. 2,870.00 Carpeting-Administration Building W 39495 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,NA. 7,526.00 Trustee Bank Service-Sense"A"1993 Refunding COP 39496 Chromate Industrial Corp 679.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39497 William and Helen Chu 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39498 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 35A7 Once Supplies 39499 Cole-Penner Instrument Co. 195.00 Lab Supplies 39500 Color Arts,Inc. 2,537.57 Vehicle Decals 39501 Communications Supply Corp. 492.79 Computer Software/Hardware 39502 Computers America,Inc. 3,487.72 Computer Supplies 39503 Connection Technology Canter,Inc. 2,354.18 High Frequency Magnet System 39504 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Ira. 54.36 Electrical Supplies 39505 Converse Consultants 5,491.00 Professional Services-J-71-2,P1-37,J-85,P2.60 39506 Comerstons Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-Management Training 39507 Corporate Express 143.75 Once Supplies 39508 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 615.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 39509 County Wholesale Electric Co. 576.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39510 Cronatron Welding Systems, Inc. 1.028.47 Welding Parts&Supplies 39511 CAPIO:Calif Assoc of Public Info OfIcls 45.00 Communications Meeting Registration 39512 COP Industries 272.44 Janitorial Supplies 39513 CGvL Engineers 11,352.00 Professional Services-J-71-1,J-71-2 39514 CR&R,Inc. 2,835.00 Container Rentals 39515 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 1.080.00 Lab Analysis 39516 CWEA 31.31 Publication Page 3 of 12 Claims Paid From 10110/01 to 10131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39517 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 39518 David's Tree Service 1.800.00 Tree Maint.Service 39519 Del Mar Analytical 808.00 Blosol'lds Analysis 39520 Phyllis Demler 599.77 User Fee Refund Re Sepik;Tanks 39521 DeZurik do Misco/SoulhWest 252.79 Valves 39522 The Dickson Company 143.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 39523 Dennis Dlmaalo 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39524 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 685.31 Stationery&Office Supplies 39525 Dr.Leslie Rosenfeld 156.00 Professional Services J-85 39526 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 108.09 Paint Supplies 39527 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 288.96 Electrical Supplies 39528 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 180.00 Medical Screening 39529 Reliastar 15,215.33 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-September 2001 39530 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Oceen Monitoring MO 5-24-95 39531 Environmental Management Consulting 8,635.92 Professional Services J-71-7 39532 Edward Erickson 81.57 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39533 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 404.25 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 39534 FedEx Corporation 216.95 Air Freight 39535 Rafael&Esther Fernandez 1,059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks m 39536 Thomas and Diane Flllmore 1.121.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks X 39537 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7,311.11 Lab Parts&Supplies = 39538 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 546.00 Comets Cubing W 39539 Flo-Systems,Inc. 885.76 Pump Supplies _q 39540 Fountain Valley Camera 16.29 Photo Supplies 00 39541 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 600.50 Truck Wash Tickets 39542 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 89.66 Paint Supplies 39543 Franklin Covey 708.00 O01ce Supplies 39544 Anthony&Renee Fuehrer 1,059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39545 General Petroleum 10,884.30 Unleaded Gasoline 39546 Thomas Gemce 1,059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39547 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 831.97 Bell Filter Press Supplies 39548 Lamy and Melissa Gordon 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39549 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,679.31 Electrical Pants&Supplies 39550 Mrs.W.Guss 81.57 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39551 Governmental Accounting Standards Board 105.00 Subscription 39652 Haaker Equipment Company 1.571.37 Truck Supplies 39553 Hach do Portion Industries 2,406.50 Lab Supplies 39554 Harbour Engineering Group 8,868.75 Pump Supplies 39555 Donald Haring 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39556 Hatch&IOrk,Inc. 1,414.72 Engine Generator Control Supplies 39557 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 145.90 Meeting Expenses 39558 Anthony Hernandez 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39559 Tim&Shamron Holland 072.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39560 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium 39561 Home Depot 156.73 Small Hardware 39562 Hopkins Technical Producle 5,058.95 Instrument Parts&Supplies Page 4 of 12 Claims Paid From 10/16/01 to 10131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39563 Caleb&Patricia Howard 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39564 Hub Auto Supply 17.11 Automotive Parts&Supplies 39565 Ida Huff 1.059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39566 City of Huntington Beach 125.00 Fire Code Permit 39567 HI Standard Automotive 14.598.30 Automotive Supplies&Installation 39568 Industrial Distribution Group 1,607.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39569 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 5,049.52 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 39570 Interstate Battery Systems 1,369.55 Battedes 39571 hon Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 IXfsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 39572 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.43 Photographic Services 39573 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.14 Water Use 39574 IBM Corp. 3.774.54 IBM AS/400 Lease 39575 IMRI 3,850.00 Temporary Employment Services 39576 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 774.53 Instrument Repairs 39577 Jack Higgins 3.000.00 Consulting Services-Engineering Dept.Business Coaching 39578 Jay's Catering 1,491.10 Meeting Expenses 39579 Johnstone Supply 1,277.56 Electrical Pads&Supplies 39580 Karen Monaco&Associates 7,685.00 FIS Support Services 39581 Kensington Electronics 1,121.81 Electrical Pans&Supplies m 39582 Lab Support 20,817.34 Temporary Employment Services X 39583 Glenn Larson 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks = 39584 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodger&Spriggs 3,644.90 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs W 39585 LaMolle Company 871.90 Lab Parts&Supplies =i 39586 Lee&Ro,Inc. 11,776.80 Engineering Services 5-49,5-50,5.51 QJ 39587 Gerald R.Jones 4,486.74 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 39588 Raul Martinez 1,059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39589 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,734.95 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 39590 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 494.50 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39591 Media Clips,Inc. 186.00 Notices 39592 Medlin Controls Co. 225.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39593 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 39594 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,008.75 Steel Parts for Helical Skimmer 39595 Mission Uniform Service 5,575.D8 Uniform Rentals 39596 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Sire Rental 39597 MGD Technologies,Inc. 11,800.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 39598 MI Services Group,Inc. 4,950.00 Information Technology Training Registration 39599 MSA-do Geoff Cobbett 50.00 Membership 39600 Stephen and Linda Nagel 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39601 National Plant Services,Inc. 6.330.00 Vawum Truck Services 39602 Neal Supply Co. 1.314.41 Plumbing Supplies 39603 NetVersanl of Southern California 4.000,94 Security System Maintenance 39604 Newark Electronics 1,357.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39605 Nodab 273.55 Lab Pans&Supplies 39606 Norms Refrigeration 205.49 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39607 NASSCO 250.00 Membership 39808 O.C.Windustrial Co. 351.52 Plumbing Parts&Supplies Page 5 of 12 Claims Paid From 10116/O1 to 10/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39609 Office Depot Business Services Div. 27.08 Office Supplies 39610 Olympus America, Inc. 830.03 Camera Repairs 39611 Orange County Hose Company 26.88 Hose Supplies 39612 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 148.06 Fittings 39613 Oxygen Service Company 3,052.79 Specialty Gases 39614 OCB Reprographics 1,656.75 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 39615 Pacific Bell 1,228.66 Telephone Services 39618 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 39617 Pacific Mechanical Supply 9,185.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39618 Pacific Parts&Controls 958.42 Electrical Supplies 39619 Pagenet 1.281.98 Paging Services 39620 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 188.75 Electrical Supplies 39621 Parker Supply Company 000.00 Mechanical Seal Upgrade 39622 Parkrouse Tire Co. 1,401.98 Tires 39623 Parts Unlimited 477.24 Truck Supplies 39624 Frank Pevlik 872.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39625 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,107.11 tab Parts&Supplies 39626 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 4,208.75 Sodium Hyppchlorle 39627 Port Supply 252.56 Safety Supplies m 39628 Primary Source 1,602.70 Office Furniture X 39629 Pulzmeister 031.97 Pump Supplies = 39830 PCS Express 92.20 Courier Service 00 39631 R.T.Corporation 131.00 Lab Supplies =i 39632 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.423.70 Trash Removal 03 39633 Rainin Instrument Co,.Inc. 499.38 Lab Supplies 39634 Regents of Univ.of California 13,765.61 Professional Services J-85 39635 Paul Ritchey 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39836 Rote Rooter-N.O.C.S11 1,000.00 Sewer Line Repair at H&I Scrubbers at Pit.2 39637 Russelectric,Inc. 747.76 Electrical Supplies 39838 Rutsn B Tucker L.L.P. 22,972.65 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 39839 Ryan Harm Products Corp. 267.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39640 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 990.00 Repair&Malnt.Services-Administration Building Atnum Pool 39641 RPM Electric Motors 412.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39642 Joey Santee 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39643 Schwing America,Inc. 814.00 Pump Supplies 39644 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 13,286.85 Tools&Mechanical Supplies 39645 Sheshunoff 289.95 Subscription 39646 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 106.24 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39647 Southern California Edison 35.43 Power 39648 Sparkle8s 1,603.04 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 39649 Spherion Corporation 221.25 Legal Servicas-Tran vs.Kovacs 39850 State Board of Equalization 565.10 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 39651 Sterling Art 143.68 Stationery&Office Supplies 39652 Strata International,Inc. 1.010.92 Chemicals 39653 Sunset Ford 106.59 Vehicle Supplies 39654 Sumel Industrial Pads 617.92 Electrical Pads&Supplies Page 6 of 12 ^ Claims Paid From 10/16/01 to 10131101 Warrant No. Vendw Amount Description 39855 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 39656 SPEC Services,Inc. 6,505.26 Engineering Services J-33-1 39657 SWRCB Accounting Offloe 10.000.00 NPDES Waste Discharge Permit Annual Fees 39658 Temunlx International Co.a2474 300.00 Pest Control 39659 Tetra Tech, Inc. 3,274.00 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 39680 Textile Engineering Associates 5,948.24 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 39661 Themes Elemental 11,448.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 39882 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 741.45 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 39663 Deily Pilot 87.50 Notices 8 Ada 39664 Total News Tracking 99.38 Media Reporting Services 39665 Tran Consulting Engineers 19,140.00 Consulting Services Pi-80,J-66,3-2-1 39666 Troy Systems, Inc.(LOCAL OFFICE) $63.48 (4)Toner Cartridges 3DS67 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 1,166.95 Truck 8 Auto Supplies 39W Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 80.00 Lab Services 39M Voided Check - - 39670 Teksystems 3,746.00 Temporary Employment Services 39671 Ultra Scientific 172.50 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 39872 Union Bank of California 2,376.18 Banking Services 39673 United Parcel Service 950.93 Parcel Services ITI 39674 Naval Post Graduate School 645.78 Professional Services J-05 = 39875 University of Arizona 10,000.00 Water Quality Center,Enhanced Associate Membership 39676 Valley Cities Supply Company 945.82 Mechanical Pens 8 Supplies W 39677 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,460.00 Temporary Employment Service 1 39678 Varian,Inc 649.76 Lab Pans&Supplies DO 39679 Verizon California 4,415.41 Telephone Services 39680 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.335.72 Vision Service Premium 39681 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 5,220.26 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 39682 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,290.03 Security Guards 39683 Wareforce 3,890.43 Software 39684 Water Environment Federation 9.25 Freight 39085 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 3.689.33 Engineering Service J-67 39686 WEF 148.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 39687 WS Atkins Water 10,500.00 Blosolids Testing Agreement 39688 Xerox Corporation 5,351.63 Copier Leases 39689 Yardley Instruments 3.581.74 Instrument Parts 6 Supplies 39690 Zee Medical 4,108.23 First Aid Supplies 39691 Zymark Corporation 4,837.50 Lab Equipment Service-Robotic System 39692 California Bank 8 Trust 14.381.00 Construction J-33-1,Retention 39693 Los Angeles Air Conditioning,Inc. 24.595.92 Construction-Dust Collection System at Plants 1 8 2 Carpenter Shops 39694 Southern Contracting Company 23,173.00 Construction J-33.1A 39695 Union Bank of California 1,988.29 Construction P7-462 8 J-53,Retention 39696 Union Bank of California 4.322.00 Construction P2.60,Retention 39697 Jeffrey Brown 703.49 MeetingTaining Expense Reimbursement 39698 James E.Colston 166.10 Meeting/7ralning Expense Reimbursement 39699 Voided Check - - 39700 Michelle R. Hetherington 134.35 Meeting77rainin9 Expense Reimbursement Page 7 of 12 Claims Paid From 10/16101 to 10/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39701 Dustin Le 279.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39702 Michael D.Moore 105.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39703 Michael Reideler 244.09 Meelingri mining Expense Reimbursement 39704 Wendy T.Sevenandl 149.42 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 39705 Curt V.Shelp 129.71 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 39706 Orlando A.Tafolla 938.45 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 39707 Mary S.Thompson 229.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39708 Edward M.Tones 769.94 Meelingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 39709 Mortis C.Ying 322.29 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39710 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 720.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 39711 Orange County Sanitation District 936.41 Petty Cash Reimb. 39712 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 618.65 Cpmplance Meeting Registration 39713 Orange County Sanitation District 467.250.40 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 39714 Orange County Water District 574.535.78 Cooperative Agreement J-36(GWRS) 39715 Southern California Edison 87,896.79 Power 39716 The Yakima Company 57,242.66 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 - 39717 Airgas Safety 1.030.99 Safety Supplies 39718 American Leak Detection 425.00 Professional Services-Sewedine Testing(J-85) 39719 AMSA 750.00 Source Control Training Registration ITI 39720 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 387.12 Telephone Service = 39721 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 85.80 Telephone Service 39722 K Brunner 1,123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39723 RButler c/o William Butler 1,123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39724 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1.647.17 Copier Lasses W 39725 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 67.10 Electrical Supplies 39728 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 110.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39727 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 15.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 39728 County of Orange-Auditor/Controller 2.478.00 Parcel Maps 39729 CVWMA 75.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 39730 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membersmp-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 39731 David's Tree Service 1.300.00 Tree Main.Service 39732 Diehl,Evans&Co.,L.L.P. 500.00 Accounting Training Registration 39733 Fertilizer Research&Edu.Program 90.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 39734 First American Title Company 15.500.00 Escrow Deposit-Bicsolids Management Site Acquisition 39735 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Gamishmenl 39736 Paul Gruenbeck 1,034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39737 City of Huntington Beach 18.788.64 Water Use 39738 Industrial Distribution Group 21.98227 Mechanical Pans&Tools 39739 In8 Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.502.55 Dues Deduction 39740 Ronald or Linda Jones 81.57 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39741 Ms.K. Falk 1,034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39742 Knott Laboratory,Inc. 880.00 Professional Services-Trsn vs.Kovacs 39743 League of California Cities 26.00 Publication 39744 League Of CA Cities 45.00 Administration Meeting Registration 39745 Legislative Seminars 125.00 Compliance Training Registration 39746 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 247205 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools - Page 8 of 12 Claims Paid From 10116101 to 10131101 Warrant No, Vend" Amount Description 39747 Stephen and Linda Nagel 30.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39748 National Seminars Group 358.00 Accounting Training Registration 39749 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 8,955.00 Eng.,O&M&Information Technology Training Registration 39750 National Water Research Institute 245.00 Compliance Meeting Registation 39751 City of Newport Beach 77.48 Water Use 39752 Orange Counly Forum 450.00 Engineering Training Registration 39753 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 39754 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 793.30 Finings 39755 OCFA 467.37 Dues Deduction 39756 Pacific Bell 59.25 Telephone Services 39757 John or Deborah Patterson 86BAl User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39753 Peter Anderson,M.D.Medical Group 132.00 Emergency Room Services 39759 Quest Software 516.00 Software Maintenance&Upgrade 39760 Eric&Mary Scarborough 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39761 Norbert Schalk 1.034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39762 Southern California Water 83.93 Water Use 39763 SARBS 200.00 O&M Training Registration 39764 SAW PA 6,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 39765 SOAP 1,030.00 Compliance Meeting Registration&NPDES Permit Database ITI 39766 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 668.46 Mechanical Pars&Supplies = 39767 Tyro Electronics Corporation 1,390.00 Instrumentation Training Registration 39768 U.S Postal Service 6,000.00 Postage W 39769 The Unisoume Corporation 193.07 Office Supplies I 39770 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions Ca 39771 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 400.00 Administration Meeting Registration 39772 Valve Automation&Controls 981.47 Valves 39773 Verizon California 94.33 Telephone Services 39774 West American Rubber Company 6,984.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39775 WEF 112.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 39776 Xerox Corporation 6,001.35 Copier Leases 39777 Donald R.Cleveland 26527 Meeting/7rain ing Expense Reimbursement 39778 Norman Eckenrode 600.72 MeehngTralning Expense Reimbursement 39779 Timothy D.Foley 271.76 Meeting/7raining Expense Reimbursement 39780 Chuck M.Forman 1,258.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39781 James R.Harris 213.74 Meeling/Tmimng Expense Reimbursement 39782 Ingrid G.Hellebrand - 516A8 Meegng/fmining Expense Reimbursement 39783 Michelle R.Hetherington 389.69 Meeting/Trsinlllg Expanse Reimbursement 39784 Thomas A.Hum 169.18 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 39785 Deirdre E. Hunter 242.95 Meegng/frainlng Expense Reimbursement 39786 Vladimir A.Kogan 1,352.31 Meeting/fralning Expense Reimbursement 39767 John Mirkovich 241.79 Meeting/frsining Expense Reimbursement 39788 Matthew P.Smith 1,094.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39789 Jane H.Tran 25726 Meetingri'mining Expense Reimbursement 39790 William F.Webster,Jr. 810.81 Meeting7raining Expense Reimbursement 39791 Charles F.Wimor 906.20 Meeling/Traming Experse Reimbursement 39792 Acroburr Inc.N2 254.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 9 of 12 Claims Paid From 10/16101 to 10131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39793 All Metal Paint Skipping, Inc.#2 1,630.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39794 Alloy Die casting 52.99 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39795 Alpha Beta Markets(Bakery) 4,88020 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39796 Alum-A-Therm 136.67 Reconclllalion User Fee Refund Program 39797 Aluminum Precision 409.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39798 Amerim r,Building Products,Inc. 76.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39799 Anaheim Extrusion Co.,Inc. 207.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39800 Asteeh/MCI Manufacturing 4,401.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39801 APW Enclosure Systems 1,122.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39802 APW Enclosure Systems,L.L.C. 2,853.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39803 ARO Services 49.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39804 Basin Marine, Inc. 71.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39805 Ban Houston Co. 2,888.42 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39805 Beckman Coulter,Inc. 18.831.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39807 Boeing-Anaheim 13.064.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39808 Brea Community Hospital 3,910.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39809 Bristol Industries 8,790.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39810 BI Technologies 11,777.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39811 Cambro Manufacturing 1,210.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program m 39812 Central Powder Coating 243.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39813 Ceradyne,Inc. 7,639.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program = 39814 Chapman Hospital 3,261.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program W 39815 Cheek Engineering and Stamping 95,23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 1 39816 Cherry Textron 14.490.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program W 39817 Circuit Center 90.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39818 Huntington Beach Medical Center 4.313.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39819 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 255.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 39820 Criteion Machine Works 743.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39821 CrockeO Container Corp. 2.140.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39822 Data Aire, Inc. 1.215.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39823 Eaton Corporae0nM1SC Products 2,628.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39824 Edwards Lifescienco,L.L.C. 13,766.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39825 Essex Group.Inc. 11.830.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39826 Flexible Metal Hose Manufacturing 72.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39827 Fullerton Foods/Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. 598.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39828 General Electric Co. 4,651.70 Re oncillalion User Fee Refund Program 39829 Gallade Chemical,Inc. 61.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39830 Gardner Lithograph 295.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39831 General Container Corp. 1,041.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39832 Gomlech Electronics 16.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39833 Grant Piston Rings,Div.of Fron 257.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39M Graphic Packaging Corp. 1,079.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39835 H.Koch 8 Sons 898.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39836 Hamilton Materials 2,037.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39837 Harbor Truck Bodies 212.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39838 The Hartwell Corporation 1,994.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 10 of 12 Claims Paid From 1011W01 to 10131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39839 High-Tech Coatings 148.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39840 Hightower Plating&Manufacturing Co. 3,041.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39841 Irvine Sensors Corp. 2,014.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39642 ICN Blomedicals 1,853.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39843 ITT Cannon Electric 9,562.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39844 ITT Jabsco Products 928.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39845 J&H Debuping, Inc.a2 636.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39846 Jefferson SmuKl Corp.(U.S.) 6,206.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program. 39847 Johnson Controls,Inc. 9,748.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39M JKL Manufacturing 82 15.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39849 Kirkhlll Rubber 2,940.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39850 Lam Lighting, Inc. 1,809.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39851 Logi Graphics 190.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39852 Los Alamitos Econo-Wash 166.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39853 Los Alamitos General Hospital 5.432.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39854 Lucas Western, Inc. 662.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39855 Mark Optics, Inc. 178.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39856 Mead Packaging 2.608.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39857 Milbank West,Inc. 5,173.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program ITI X 39858 Monarch Precision Deburdng Co. 953.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program = 39859 Rudy S.Munoz Laundries 687.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program x 39860 Neville Chemical 226.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39861 Newport Corporation 8.056.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Co39862 O'Donnell Oil,L.L.C. 105.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39863 Orange Container,Inc. 3,208.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39864 Orange Resourco Recovery System 239.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39M Psdfica Aerospace Corp. 712.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39866 Payton Technology Corp 4,898.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39867 Pico Fared,Inc. 415.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39868 Pier Oil Company 83.51 Reconclllabon User Fee Refund Program 39869 Pllkirgton Aerospace 10,13M.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39870 Precision Painting 493.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39871 Renal Research 904.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39872 Revere Transducers 378.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39873 Richard Services 76.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39874 Rock Industries 13.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39875 Scisorek&Sons Flavors,Inc. 122.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39876 Shipley Company,L.L.C. 1.236.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39877 St.Jude Medical Center 3,706.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39878 Star Powder Coating 77.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39879 Sunclipse,Inc. 1,637.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39M SPS Technologies 18,583.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39881 Taormina Industries, Inc. 136AT Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39882 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1.237.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39883 Town&Country Laundry 402.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39884 Transline Technology,Inc 19.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 11 of 12 Claims Paid From 10M6101 to 10131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39885 Troy Systems,Inc. 303.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39886 U.W.M.C.Hospital Corp.-Anaheim 1,106.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39887 United Custom Polishing 8 Puling 600.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39888 Vencor, Inc. 9,477.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39589 Weber Aircraft,Inc. 16,074.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39M XZX Electronics,Inc. 23.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39891 T K K(USA),Inc. 1.719.77 Reconciliation leer Fee Refund Program 39892 y2K Teldile Co..Inc. 1,155.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,222,447.83 Payroll Disbursements 24549-24677 Employee Paychecks $ 169,850.93 Biweekly Payroll 10/17/01 24678-24678 Interim Paycheck 36.61 Adjustment 24679-24790 Employee Paychecks 167,371.74 Biweekly Payroll W/31/01 65885.66337 Direct Deposit Statements 772,290.65 Bhyeekly Payroll 10/17/01 66338-66787 Direct Deposit Statements 792,641.04 Biweekly Payroll 10/31/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,902,190.87 Wire Transfer Payments I71 State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Calif. $ 63,084.50 October Interest Payment on Sad"2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation = Total Wire Transfer Payments s 63.084.50 W Total Claims Paid 10/16/01-10/31/01 $ 7,187,723.20 lP Page 12 of 12 3 n 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeeangDate To ad 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I[em Number s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vole. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/01/01 —11/15/01 and 11/16/01 — 11/30/01 Claims Paid From 11/O1/01 to 11115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 39893 AKM Consulting Engineers $ 41,676.14 Professional Services 7-36,7-39&7-41 39894 AVO Intemallonal 57,014.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39895 Black It Veatch Corporation 122,833.69 Professional Services J-71.3&J-77 39896 Blue Cross of California 220.796.79 Medical Insurance Premium 39897 Brown&Caldwell 95.475.45 Professional Services J-25-5&1-98 39898 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 62,272.22 Engineering Services J40.3,7.36,7-39&7.41 39899 Cardlo Engineers 279,795.56 Professional Services SP-90,Pt-60,P2.60&P2.66 39900 DeZudk Uo Mbco/SoulhWest 28,671.32 Valves 39901 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 107,743.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 39902 Lee&Ro,Inc. 178.240.01 Professional Services 5.52,J-71.7&J47 39903 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 31,725.19 Sodium Hypochlodte 39904 Polydyne.Inc. 27.180.34 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 39905 Realtime Systems Corporation 49.967.00 Software Maintenance 39906 Science Applications Ina.,Corp. 90,159.82 Ocean Monitoring MO B-8-94 39907 Synegro West,Inc. 86,749.51 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 39908 Tule RanclVMagan Forms 120.026.57 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 39909 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 108,774.04 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 39910 The Yakima Company 53,248.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 39911 Ark Construction Company 31,797.00 Construction Pl-62&Enclose Open Bay at Pit.l Warehouse Storage Area = 39912 Jamison Engineering Conlractore, Inc. 75,423.00 Construction 2-41-2 W 39913 Ken Thompson,Inc. 646,406.00 Construction 5-46 39914 Mike Pdlch&Sons 82.844.30 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrades D 39915 Hoeg Memorial Hospital 25,752.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39916 Kimbedy-Clark Corp. 36,345.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39917 West Newport OII Company 46,652.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 39918 ATlnt of Glass 131.86 Vehicle Window Tinting 39919 Action Door Repair Corporation 3,264.00 Fumish&Install Roll-Up Aluminum Door 39920 Greet American Printing Co. 25.80 Printing 39921 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 220.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39922 Aearo Company 3,125.00 Safety Supplies 39923 Air Liquids America Corp. 341.90 Specialty Gasses 39924 Airborne Express 53.05 Air Freight 39925 Alrges Safety 3,726.34 Safety Supplies 39926 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 267.53 Mechanical Supplies 39927 American Airlines 6,215.48 Travel Services 39928 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 1,000.00 Toxicity Testing 39929 Atlantis Pool Care 890.00 Admin.Bldg.Atrium Pond Cleaning 39930 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,216.31 Long Distance Telephone Service 39931 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 48.57 Telephone Service 39932 AT It T Wireless Services-Airtime 4.877.89 Cellular Telephone Service 39933 AWSI 133.00 Dept.ofTransportation Training Program-Advanced Workplace Strategies 39934 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 2.966.26 Telephone Equipment 39935 Battery Specialties 918.22 Batteries 39936 Bell Land Surveying 14,430.00 Professional Services-Surveying 39937 Boyle Engineedng Corporation 21,243.64 Engineering Services 1-24&6.13 39938 Breaker Supply 940.63 Electrical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01/01 to 11/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39939 Brett F.Sanders,Ph.D 500.00 Professional Services-Hunting Beach Phase III TAC Meeting 39940 Bush&Associates, Inc. 14,232.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 39941 C.S.U.F.Foundation 9,787.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 39942 Cal-Glass,Inc. 29.99 Lab Equipment Service 39943 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Worker's Compensation Claims 39944 Cameron Welding Supply 54.17 Welding Slop Supplies 39945 C.R.Nelson P.E. 2,800.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 39946 Carollo Engineers 1,500.91 Engineering Consultant-Blosolids Management Options 39947 Camrron Garcia von Langan Engineers 14,082.75 Engineering Services P2-82 39948 Coast Fire Equipment 174.69 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39949 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 27.95 Stationery&Office Supplies 39950 Cole Scientific 270.00 Lab Services 39951 Computer Sciences Corp. 15,954.47 Consulting&Lab Services.Assay Pilot Project 39952 Computers America,Inc. 269.91 Computer Supplies 39953 Consolidated Elect.Distnbutors,Inc. 1,098.65 Electrical Pans&Supplies 39954 Consolidated Plastics Company 276.67 Stationery&Office Supplies 39955 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 412.09 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 39956 Cooper Energy Services 136.21 Engine Supplies 171 39957 Coppens Family Tr.clo Tried Commercial 1,918.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program X 39958 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-Management Training = 39959 Corporate Express Imaging 484.83 Computer Supplies 39960 Corporate Express 880.73 Office Supplies 39961 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 14.247.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 D 39962 Cost Containment Solutions 15.914.66 Worker's Comp.Services 39963 County Wholesale Electric Co. 7,38OA2 Eledntal Pans&Supplies and Computer Hard"re 39964 Crane America Services,Inc. 1,100.00 Crane Repairs 39965 CCP Indusides 91.70 Janitorial Supplies 39966 CWEA Energy Conference 75.00 Maintenance Meeting Registration 39967 CWFA Membership 140.OD Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 39968 Diamond H Recognition 773.48 Employee Service Awards 39969 Dlokson's,Inc. 1,353.43 Electrical Pans&Supplies 39970 Dionex Corporation 138.10 Lab Supplies 39971 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 75.60 Paint Supplies 39972 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc 634.26 Electrical Supplies 39973 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,205.00 Medical Screening 39974 Electra-Bond 994.35 Mechanical Maintenance 39975 ElmcolDelanay.Inc. 824.75 Plumbing Pars&Supplies 39976 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 39977 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1.536.60 Lab Pans&Supplies 39978 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 778.55 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 39979 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,014.30 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 39980 FedEx Corporation 35.77 Air Freight 39981 First American Real Estate Solugons 236.00 Orange County Property Information 39982 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 6.466.52 Lab Pans&Supplies 39983 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 227.20 Paint Supplies 39984 Franklin Covey 52.89 Office Supplies 39985 Frys Electronic 649.88 Computer Supplies Page2of8 Claims Paid From 11/01101 to 11115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39986 Gacehl Lumber Company 168.31 LumbedHardware 39987 Gardner-Darner do Misco 228.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39988 Garraa-Callahan Company 3,761.32 Chemicals 39989 Gemini Enterprises 475.00 Construction Trailer Deck Repairs at Plt.2 39990 General Petroleum 10.618.27 Unleaded Gasoline 39991 George Yardley Co. 161.53 Electrical Supplies 39992 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,380.30 Belt Filter Press Supplies 39993 Gold Systems,Inc. 12.567.50 Prof.Sew.-Develop&Implementation of Data Migration&STOREf Interface Appl. 39994 Gddervest Fence Company 200.OD Fenix Repairs 39995 Golderrvrest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 39M W W Grainger,Inc. 23.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39997 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 134.68 Janitorial Supplies 39M Edwards Systems Technology 380.00 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 39999 Harbour Engineering Group 15,125.61 Pump&Pump Supplies 40000 Harold Primmse Ica 757.00 Ica For Samples 40001 Harrington IndusWal Plastics,Inc. 904.44 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 40002 Hatch B Kirk,Inc. 1.673.44 Engine Generator Control Supplies 40003 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery It Deli 107.45 Meeting Expenses 40004 High Purity Standards 44.75 Lab Parts&Supplies X 40005 Hill!,Inc. 135.43 Electrical Pans&Supplies = 40006 The Holman Group 708.58 Employee Assistance Program Premium W 4W07 Home Depot 1,161.97 Small Harchme 40008 Hopkins Technical Products 760.00 Pump Supplies D 40DD9 Horizon Technology 266A5 Lab Supplies 40010 Hub Auto Supply 261.39 Truck Parts 40011 Imaging Express 281.20 Printer Maintenance 40012 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,112.97 Printing Service 40013 Industrial Distribution Group 1,382.98 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40014 Industrial Metal Supply 478.83 Metal 40015 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc 2,565.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40016 Invensys Systems,Im 1,439.69 Instrument Supplies 40017 J&L Industrial Supply 2.430.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40018 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 1,612.43 J-a5 Flow Tests-Equipmerd Labor 40019 Jays Catering 633.72 Meeting Expenses 40020 Johnstone Supply 40.87 Electrical Supplies 40021 JPR Systems, Inc. 1,963.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40022 Kabbare Engineering 10,670.00 Prof.Sam.-Traffic Control&Phasing for Sewer Force Main Valve AdNstrnents 40023 Karen Menace&Associates 8.877.50 FIS Support Services 40024 Komax Systems,Inc 2,893.10 (1)High Pass Sludge Mixer 40025 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 123.31 Mechanical&Lab Pans&Supplies 40026 Lab Support 2.479.55 Temporary Employment Services 40027 Lexls-Nexis 44.72 Books&Publications 40028 Liner Company C/O Gerald Jones 4,251.91 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 40029 Mamm International 709.50 Janitorial Supplies 40030 Manati,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 40031 MaNac Electronics 106.14 Electrical Pads&Supplies 40032 Mc Junkin Corp-Ontario Branch 2,541.72 Plumbing Supplies Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01/O1 to 11/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40033 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 490.63 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40D34 Mec Analytical System 3,558.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 40035 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 249.98 Mechanical Pads&Repairs 40036 Media Resurfacing Systems,Inc. 1,500.00 Equipment Mainlenance 40037 Medlin Controls Co. 1,118.30 Instrument Supplies 40038 Mellon Trust 19.540,36 Investment Custodian Bank 40D39 Meffler-Toledo 377.00 Software Maintenance 40040 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,970.62 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 40041 Mission Uniform Service 3019.90 Uniform Rentals 40D42 Morton Salt 543.61 Salt for Water Softener Systems 40043 MotoPhob 175.42 Photographic Services 40044 NBC Applied Environmental Sciences 12,026.82 Professional Services J-85 40D45 MI Services Group,Inc. 4.950.00 IT Training Registration 40D46 Mine Safety Appliances 632.33 Electrical Parts&Supplies 40047 National Institute of Standards&Tech 2.500.00 Lab Supplies 40048 Neal Supply Co. 53.97 Plumbing Supplies 40049 Nev,Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 960.00 Compliance Training Registration 40050 Newark Electronics 383A6 Instrument Supplies 40051 The Norco Companies 159.54 Mail Delivery Service ITI X 40052 O.C.Windustrial Co. 764.62 Plumbing Pads&Supplies = 40053 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.937.52 Office Supplies W 40054 OneSource Distributors,Ina. 866.13 Eletlncel Pans,Supplies&Repairs --I40055 Orange County Vector Control District 2,234.42 Past Control D 40056 Oxygen Service Company 4,063.74 Specialty Gases 40057 OCB Reprographics 989.82 Printing Service-MO 126100 40D58 OCE-USA,Inc. 331.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 40059 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 83.01 Fillers 40060 Pacific Bell 44.02 Telephone Services 40061 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4.451.92 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40062 Pacific Pans&Controls 9,600.84 Computer Hardware/SothNare 40063 Parker Supply Company 9.528.54 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 40064 Parkhouse Tire Co. 310.89 Tires 40065 Parts Unlimited 330.79 Truck Supplies 40066 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 6.321.00 Emergency Spill Cleanup 40067 Pearl Art&Craft 50.04 Art&Graphic Supplies 40068 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 461.66 Lab Parts&Supplies 40069 Pema Pure,Inc. 207.81 Filter 40070 Peter Anderson,MD Medical Group 82.62 Emergency Room Services 40071 Plotter Supplies,Inc. 462.53 Stationary&Office Supplies 40072 Power Design 99825 Electrical Supplies 40073 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 53820 Employee Legal Servioe Insurance Premium 40074 Print Management Group,Inc. 1.366.33 Printing Services 40075 Process Equipment Company 1.482.46 Pump Supplies 40076 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 40077 OOS.L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 40078 R.W.Berk 13,853.00 Professional Services P1-62 40079 Rellsslsr 8,449A5 Employee Medical Health Premium Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01/01 to 11/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40050 Rota Rooter-N.O.C.011 135.00 Drain Cleaning at Pit.2 H&1 Scrubber Complex 40081 Ruten&Tucker L.L.P. 7.933.34 Legal Services-Crow-Wimhrop Development 40082 Ryan Havoo Products Corp. 1,359.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40083 RPM Electric Motors 322.50 Electrical Pens&Supplies 40084 RS Hughes Co,Inc 12.33 Point Supplies 40085 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 9,140.00 ConsWction -Manhole Repair 4DO86 Schneider Electric 4,961.13 Software Maint.Agreement 40087 Schaing America,Inc. 1,177.61 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40088 City of Seal Beach 120.40 Water Use 40089 Shepherd Machinery Co. 1,920,08 (1)PC Can 40090 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 70.84 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 40091 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 835.84 Lab Parts&Supplies 40092 Sign Industries,Inc. 315.60 Diredional Slgnage at Plant 2 40093 Southern California Edison 9,245.02 Power 40094 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 549.73 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 40095 Spherlon Corporation 400.00 Legal Services-Train vs.Kovacs 40096 Stanley S.Grant,Ph.) 500.00 Professional Services J-85,HS III(TAC) 40097 Successories, Inc. 446.94 Pictures 40098 Summit Steel 1,08624 Metal 40099 Sunset Ford 530.73 Vehicle Supplies = 40100 Sunset Industrial Paris 1.594.46 Mechanical&Electrical Pens Supplies 40101 SCP Science 284.00 Lab Pans&Supplies 40102 SS Mechanical Corp. 6,400.00 Construction P2.66-1 D 40103 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 1,378.00 Lab Analysed Service 40104 The Lewis Group 13,810.37 Consulting Service-Pooled Management Process, 40105 The Orange County Register 1,324.80 Notices&Ads 40106 Thomas Grey&Assoc. 450.00 Lab Analyses&Report 40107 Thompson Industrial Supply Inc 730.82 Mechanical Part&Supplies 40108 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 40100 Train Consulting Engineers 19,375.00 Professional Services 1-17.7-21 40110 The Trans Company 3,065.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 40111 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 11,091.56 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 40112 Tuthill Energy Systems,do Mckenns 457.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40113 U.S.Peroxide 2,832.63 Hydrogen Peroxide 40114 United Parcel Service 32.11 Parcel Services 40115 United Rentals,Inc. 121.89 Tod Rental 40116 Universal Specialties,Inc. 16125 Plumbing Pans&Supplies 40117 Unocal 76 165.69 Fuel for Vehicles 241-2 40118 Valley Cities Supply Company 615.42 Plumbing Supplies 40119 Verlb=California 2,013.38 Telephone Services 40120 Veme's Plumbing 1.000.00 Testing&Codification for Backlow Devices at Pits.1 &2 and Pump Stations 40121 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 3,631.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 40122 The Wackenhut Corporation 3.426.30 Security Guards 40123 Wareforca 1,579.18 Software 40124 Waste Markets Corp. 2246.25 Service Agreement-Digester Maint. 40125 Wexle Sanitary Supply 897.89 Janitorial Supplies 40126 Wellabs,Inc 2,250.00 Lab Pans&Supplies Page 5 018 Claims Paid From 11/01101 to 11/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Ananias Description 40127 INS Alkire Water 5,000.00 Biosolids Testing Agreement 40128 %emx Corporation 9.199.08 Copier 8 Fax Leases 40129 Zee Medical 36523 First Aid Supplies 40130 Zymark Corporation 1.131.55 Lab Pads B Supplies 40131 James P.Senzie 1.167.16 Mee6ngfrraining Expense Reimbursement 40132 Marc A-Broom 200.27 Meeting training Expense Reimbursement 40133 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr. 114.48 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 40134 Martin G.England 274.40 Meet ngRmining Expense Reimbursement 40135 Deirdre E.Hunter 265.00 Meeting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 40136 Larry J.Jones 212.62 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 40137 Tom B.Mereglllano 1,193.67 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 40138 Michael D.Moore 230.27 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 40139 Lisa Murphy 251.51 MeetingRaining Expense Reimbursement 40/40 Robed Doan 400A7 Meetingfimining Expense Reimbursement 40141 Douglas M.Stewart 541.92 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 40142 Sonja A.Wassgren 594.46 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 40143 Michael I.Zedek 1,693.97 Meetingfiaining Expense Reimbursement 40144 Accurate Circuit Engineering 3,439.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40145 Alta Bellwood Hospital,Inc. 1,802.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program X40146 Arm Peeoleum Products Co. 940.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program = 40147 Bond Technologies,Inc 192AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program W 4014B Peter H.Brown 1,500.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 40149 Carron Equipment West 480.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program D 40150 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 705.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 40151 Danco Metal Surfacing 419.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40152 El Tom Meat Shop 4,087.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40153 Fmnun,Inc. 4.367.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40154 Hanson-Loan Company 320.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40155 Hawk Industrial Uniform 2.472.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40166 Ideal Uniform Rental Service 4,118.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40157 Imperial Paling 56.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40150 Intec Products,Inc. 641.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40159 ICN Pharmaceuticals 5,965.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40160 Kaynar Mfg.Div.of Kaynar Tech. 4.055.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40161 Knotts Berry Farm 2.697.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 40162 L It N Uni rom 4.821.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40163 M T S Microelectronics,Inc. 28.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40164 Marcel Electronics Ind. 14.223.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40165 Nu-Tec Powder Coating 72.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40166 One Beth Scott 91.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40167 Orange County Sanitation District 686.72 Petty Cash Reimb. 40168 Select Circuits 157.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Progam 40169 South Coast Water Company 627.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40170 E.I.Du Fora De Nemours and Company 53,596.00 Painting Malnt.Services MO 4.22-98 40171 Orange County Sanitation District 457205.57 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 40172 Orange County Water District 62,297.09 GAP Water Use MO 1D-23-96 40173 So.Cal.Gas Company 28,162.83 Natural Gas Page 6 of 8 Claim Paid From 11/01101 to 11115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40174 American Express 24,170.18 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 40175 American Leak Detection 9,900.00 Sewerine Testing J-85,HB III 40176 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 66.39 Telephone Service 40177 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 40178 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 40179 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 884.47 Point Supplies 40180 Elmco/Delaney.Inc. 524.75 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 40181 Employee Benefits Institute of America 8DO.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 40182 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 40183 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 40184 HI Standard Automotive 3,699.27 Automotive Supplies&Installation 40185 Industrial Metal Supply 86.27 Metal 40186 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 92.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40187 Ind.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,531.17 Dues Deduction 40188 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 122.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 40189 Minuteman Industries,Inc. 1.449.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40190 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 16,682.07 Engineering Service 5-41-1 40191 National Plant Services,Inc. 1,600.00 Vacuum Truck Services 40192 Wanda Creek 76.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 40193 Orange County Marshal 10D.00 Wage Garnishment = 40194 OCEA 458.12 Dues Deduction 40195 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,033,15 Plumbing Supplies 40196 Court Omer 40.00 Wage Garnishment D 40197 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 40198 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 40199 Seven-Up Bottling 450.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40200 Shunaluck Sales&Engineering 3D4.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40201 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 40202 Southern California Edison 2,040.60 Power 40203 Summit Steel 222.38 Metal 40204 SAWPA 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 40205 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 5,007.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40206 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 40207 Velie Circuits,Inc. 1.159.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40208 Verizon California 3,731.35 Telephone Services 40209 Xemx Corporation 708.73 Copier Leases 40210 Peter M.Hass 420.27 MestingRraining Expense Reimbursement 40211 Frank R.Steiger 1,343.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 40212 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 195.00 Seater Service Fee Administration 40213 David Rodriguez and COMP USA 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 40214 Wayne Aegerter and COMP USA 3,000.OD Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants 8 4.047.482.79 Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01101 to 11/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 24791 .24794 Interim Paychecks S 4,616.51 Termination and Payroll Adjustments 24795-24930 Employee Paychecks 175,130.70 Biweekly Payroll 11/14101 66788-67240 Direct Deposit Statements 750,320.84 Biweekly Payroll 11/14/01 Total Payroll Disbursements 930,068.05 Wire Transfer Payments Lloyds TSB Bank plc $ 80.522.61 Commitment Fee on Series 1992 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank(DEXIA) 77,347.93 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 98,941.78 October Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 04,982.99 October Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments 5 321,895.31 �f1 Total Claims Paid 11/01/01 to 11/15/01 8 5,299,426.15 X 2 D Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/16/01 to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrerds 40215 Orange County Sanitation District $ 52,751.42 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 40216 Applied Crean Sciences 30.852.35 Professional Services J-85 40217 Blue Cross of California 220.796.79 Medical Insurance Premium 40218 Carollo Engineers 40,920.46 Professional Services J-39 40219 Cpasl Crane Company 118.653.12 (1)16-Ton Crime 40220 Delta Dental 51,205.68 Dental Insurance Plan 40221 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 32,592.28 Medical Insurance Premium 40222 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 67,379.30 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95 40223 Lee&Ro,Inc. 28,653.75 Professional Services 5.49,5-50,5-51,5-52,Sump Pump Add'n,&Dust Collection Sys. 40224 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 86.478.19 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 40225 Orange County Water District 75,735.00 GAP Water Use MO 10.23-96 40226 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 93,556.13 Engineering Services J-42 40227 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 47,161.21 Caustic Soda&Sodium Hypochlorite 40228 Projects Partners 95,551.94 Temporary Employment Services 40229 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 42,071.77 CCTV Sewerllne Inspection&Cleaning 40230 Regents of Univ.of California 33,821.03 Professional Services J-85 40231 Rutan&Tucker L.L.P. 49,138.64 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 40232 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 117,305.00 Construction-Sewedine Repairs&Replac.to H.B.Purchase&Pumping Svrs. IT 40233 Southern California Edison 50.377.63 Power X 40234 Southland Construction 36,855.00 Construction-Palio Area Upgrade at Plant 1 2 40235 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 83,011.90 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 W 40236 Varian Associates,Inc. 84,74251 Lab Equipment,(1)Computer,(1)Printer,Hardware/Software 40237 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 32,332.93 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 03 40238 Waste Markets Corp. 31.860.65 Maintenance Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal 40239 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 109,929.17 Legal Services MO7-26.95 40240 The Yakima Company 09,111.74 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 40241 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 217.906.42 Construction J-80 40242 Castillo Western Industrial Constructors 28.127.52 Construction-Clarifiers&P&O Retaining Walls at Plant 1 40243 J W Contracting Corporation 235.061.00 Construction P2-60 40244 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 49,002.30 Construction 2-41-2 40245 Margate Construction,Inc. 457,605.00 Construction P2-39,P2.85-1 40246 MVP Commercial,Inc. 28,980.00 Construction-Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services 40247 Southern Contracting Company 29.390.00 Constructlon J-33-1A 40248 Union Bank of California 26,118.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 40249 Urbanlec Engineering,Inc. 51,894.00 Construction J-66 40250 Disneyland Resort 58,305.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 40251 St Joseph Hospital 43,869.74 Reconciliation User Fee Program 40252 Thomas,John A. 28,148.54 Reconciliation User Fee Program 40253 UCI Medical Center 27,666.05 Reconciliation User Fee Program 40254 UWMC Hospital Corp. 46,397.46 Reconciliation User Fee Program 40255 A4slus Systems 3,004.80 Notices&Ads 40256 Action Door Repair Corporation 1,031.00 Repairs to Warehouse Roll-up Door 40257 Advanced Cooling Technologies 1,204.78 Electrical Pans&Supplies 40258 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 8,085.00 Software Upgrades on PENIS System 40259 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 207.05 Lab Supplies Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 11/16MI to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40260 Air Liquids America Corp. 417.58 Specialty Gasses 40251 Airborne Express 26.81 Air Freight 40262 Airgas Safely 6,234.72 Safety Supplies 40263 AhMed,Inc. 25.04 Safety Supplies 40264 AIIIech Associates 160.02 Lab Supplies 40265 American Red Cross 2.550.00 Safely Training Registration 40266 American Society For Microbiology 106.95 Publication 40267 Amot Control Corporation 241.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40268 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 900.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 40269 Appleone Employment Service 4,140.00 Temporary Employment Services 40270 Pagenet 2,736.30 Rental Equipment,Airtime,Service&Equipment 40271 Asbury Environmental Services 150.00 Waste Oil Removal 40272 AC&S,Inc. 16,700.00 Engine Repairs&Maintenance 40273 American Sm.of Safety Engineers 1.710.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 40274 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 272.69 Telephone Service 40275 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 20.976.43 Telephone Equipment Service-Bi-Annual Contract 40276 Samstead Thermolyne 42.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 40277 Battery Specialties 741.43 Batteries 40278 Berendsen Fluid Power 433.98 Electrical Parts&Supplies IT 40279 BioMerieux Vilek,Inc. 554.73 Lab Supplies X 40280 BloSpherical Instruments,Inc. 531.29 Instrument Malnt. 2 40281 Bonhwlck,Guy,Beaenhausen 19,875.33 Professional Services P2-84 40282 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 831.96 Safety Supplies 40283 California Automatic Gate 439.20 Service Agreement co 40284 California Relocation Services,Inc. 657.16 Office Moving Services 40285 Southern Califomia Marine Institute 14.192.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support-J-85 40286 Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. 2.053.33 Professional Services-Workers Compensation Claims 40287 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1,594.63 Lab Parts&Supplies 40288 Cameron Wading Supply 20,909.05 Welding Equipment&Supplies 40289 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 2,247.50 Sewer Mapping Maintenance 40290 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 14.04 Engineering Services-Air Quality 40291 Cantury Business Solutions,Inc. 108.91 Once Supplies 40292 Copelco Capital,Inc. 367.94 Copier Lease 40293 City of Fountain Valley 11,792.16 Water Use 40294 Coast Fire Equipment 28.00 Service Agreement-Fire Extinguishers Testing,Recharging&Certification 40295 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 187.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 40296 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 13.000.00 Professional Services-Safely&Erring. Response Procedures 40297 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 9.862.50 Maintenance Agreement-Batteries,Rectifiers&UPS System 40296 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 1,612.10 Electrical Supplies 40299 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 252.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40300 Coolant Management Services 178.15 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 40301 Cooper Energy Services 718.38 Engine Supplies 40302 Corporate Express 1,832.16 Offica Supplies 40303 Cost Containment Solutions 1,590.24 Workers Comp.Services 40304 Counterpart Enterprises.Inc. 1,151.71 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40305 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,503.44 Electrical Pans&Supplies - Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 11116101 to 11130101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40306 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 40307 CA Regional Water Quality Control Board 500.00 401 Permit Certification for Outfall Project J-39 40308 CAPPO Conference Registration 300.00 Purchasing Meeting Registration 40309 CCP Industries 1,013.12 Janitorial Supplies 40310 CEM Corporation 2,09627 Lab MDS 2100 Equipment Repairs 40311 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 1,944.00 Lab Analysis 40312 CWEA Membership 178.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 40313 David's Tree Service 3,500.00 Tree Maint.Service 40314 Del Mar Analytical 1,264.00 Biosolids Analysis 40315 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 570.54 Warranty Extension-Phaser 7700 Printers 40316 DeZurik clo Misco/SouthWest 318.82 Valves 40317 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 24.81 Paint Supplies 40318 DDB Engineering,Inc. 15,600.00 Temporary Employment Services 40319 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 195.12 Electrical Supplies 40320 Earth Tech, Inc. 1,513.75 Professional Services J-85 40321 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 8,900.00 Safety Training 8 Consulting Services 40322 Enchanter, Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 40323 Environmental Resource Associates 442.20 lab Analysis 40324 Fall Corporation 292.78 Air Freight ITI 40325 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 6,192.54 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 2 40326 Foodcra8 Coffee 8 Refreshment Services 275.64 Meeting Supplies 40327 Fountain Valley Camera 46.72 Photo Supplies W 40328 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 924.45 Truck Wash Tickets —1 40329 Franklin Covey 116.09 Office Supplies M 40330 Fry's Electronics 1,532.37 Computer Supplies 40331 Full Spectrum Analylics, Inc. 698.68 Lab Instrument Service 40332 Ganahl Lumber Company 75.00 Lumber/Hardware 40333 GarraB-Callahan Company 48.54 Chemicals 40334 Gier ich-Mitchell,Inc. 24,746.20 Belt Filter Press Supplies 40335 W W Grainger,Inc. 130.06 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 40336 Graybar 33.70 Electrical Supplies 40337 Harold Primrose Ice 57.00 Ice For Samples 40338 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 672.25 Meeting Expenses 40339 Hill.Inc. 1.497.51 Tools 8 Mechanical Parts S Supplies 40340 The Holman Group 711.42 Employee Assistance Program Premium 40341 Home Depot 765.88 Small Hardware 40342 Deirdre E.Hunter 208.55 Meeling/tmining Expense Reimbursement 40343 Industrial Distribution Group 3,428.77 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 40344 Industrial Metal Supply 83.83 Metal 40345 Information Resources 1,115.00 Human Resources Service 40346 Innedine Engineering 2.370.00 Professional Services-CCTV Videoing of Trunklines 40347 Intratek Computer,Inc. 550.00 Computer Maintenance 40348 Invensys Systems,Inc. 335.58 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 40349 Irvine Ranch Water District 99.00 Water Use 40350 IBM Corp. 412.51 IBM AS1400 Lease 40351 IMRI 6.215.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 11/16101 to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40352 J&L Industrial Supply 672.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40353 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 294.10 Instrument Supplies 40354 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services,Inc. 75.25 Maintenance Agreement-Fuel Management System at Plants 1 8 2 40355 John's Philly Grille 316.29 Meeting Expenses-J-73 Workshop 40356 CSC Pans Sales/Johnson Controls, Inc. 172.49 Electrical Pans&Supplies 40357 Kelly Paper 58.70 Paper 40358 Kelly Pipe Co..L.L.C. 604.62 Plumbing Supplies 40359 Lab Safety Supply.Inc. 366.68 Tools&Mechanical Supplies 40360 Lab Support 4,646.83 Temporary Employment Services 40361 League Of CA Cities 5,000.00 Sponsorship-Orange County Leadership Symposium 40362 Linter Company c/o Gerald Jones 4,253.41 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 40363 Long Beach Uniform Co.,In. 1,518.17 Uniforms 40364 Lucci's 69.55 Meeting Expense 40365 Mako Matra Marine 71.98 Safety Supplies 40366 Manleys Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 1,255.00 Boiler Repairs&Maintenance Service 40367 Marmac Engineering 12,730.41 Professional Services PI-92 40368 Martin Container 752.50 Refrigerated Container Rentals 40369 MarVac Electronics 50.54 Electrical Pans&Supplies 40370 Mail Chlor,Inc. 1,560.59 Valves IT 40371 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 754.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies x 40372 Medlin Controls Co. 1,968.08 Electrical Parts&Supplies 2 40373 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study W 40374 Mission Uniform Service 4.540.97 Uniform Rentals 40375 Mitchell Instrument Co. 242.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies tp 40376 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 112.12 Publications 40377 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 40378 Moodys Investors Service 5,500.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 40379 Moreland&Associates 4,429.98 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 40380 MDS Consulting 3,960.00 Professional Services-Surveying PI-76 40381 MGD Technologies,Inc. 15,120.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 40382 National Microcomp Services 1.212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 40383 National Plant Services, Inc. 10,000.00 Vacuum Truck Services 40384 Neal Supply Co. 58.37 Plumbing Supplies 40385 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1.338.02 Security System Maintenance 4D386 Norms ReMgeration 38.92 Electrical Parts It Supplies 40387 O.C.Windustrial Co. 79.44 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 40388 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,802.55 Office Supplies 40389 OneSouroe Distributors,Inc. 77.94 Electrical Pans&Supplies 40390 Orange County Hose Company 26.88 Hydraulic Hose,Supplies&Repairs 40391 Oxygen Service Company 9D6.80 Specialty Gases 40392 OCB Reprographics 2.062.06 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 40393 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 294.77 Electrical Supplies 4D394 Pacific Bell 1.185.50 Telephone Services 4D395 Pacific Mechanical Supply 11.775.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40396 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 11,813.24 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 40397 Pacific Publishers 234.33 Publication Page 4 of 9 c' Claims Paid Front 11/16/01 to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40398 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 1,950.24 Chemicals 40399 Parker Supply Company 553.84 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40400 Parts Unlimited 988.82 Truck&Auto Pans 40401 Pearl Arts&Craft 48.21 Art&Graphic Supplies 40402 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 900.00 Lab Autosampler Installation 40403 Physician's Desk Reference 69.95 Publication 40404 Plumbing&Industrial Supply 604.15 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 40405 Posydyne, Inc. 15,6D3.30 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 40406 Ponton Industries,Inc. 628.87 Lab Pans&Supplies 40407 Power Ekxiro Supply Co.,Inc. 174.38 Electrical Supplies 40408 Power Pumps,Inc. 68.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 4D409 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 924.00 Mechanical Maint. 40410 Prank,Inc. 189.15 Lab Supplies 40411 Primary Source 19,216,37 Office Furniture 40412 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,289.70 Trash Removal 40413 Red Wing Shoes 305.30 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 40414 Reliastar 8,466.80 Employee Medical Health Premium 40415 RightAmwem.L.L.C. 4,378.75 Software-Desktop Foundation Channels 40416 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 580.68 Electrical Pans&Supplies IT 40417 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 1,868.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies X 40418 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 13.168.00 Professional Services P1-91 = 40419 Safety Chem,Inc. 200.00 Chemicals W 4042D Safely-Kleen 3.573.74 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 40421 Schneider Electric 8.968.90 Software Mainl.Agreement CO 40422 Schwing America,Inc. 15.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40423 Sears Industrial Sales 1,838.40 Mechanical&Electrical Pans&Supplies 40424 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 380-20 Mechanical Pans It Supplies 40425 Supeloo,Inc. 1.179.86 Lab Parts&Supplies 40426 Signature Party Rentals 93.50 Misc.Rentals 40427 SofiChoice 3,584.05 Software 40428 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 5,253.48 Permit Fees 40429 Southwest Scientific,Inc. 5.151.12 Instrument Supplies 40430 Sparkletis 2,005.38 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 40431 Spading Instruments,Inc. 172-59 Instrument Pans&Supplies 40432 Span Ceniprep.Inc. 270.30 Lab Pans&Supplies 40433 Spherion Corporation 180.35 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 40434 Strata International,Inc. 505.45 Chemicals 40435 SEC DatarComm 300.00 Software 40436 SPEC Services, Inc. 7,795.80 Engineering Services J-33-1 40437 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 40438 Teledyne Analytical 644.18 Instrument Parts&Repairs 40439 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,557.84 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40440 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 40441 Total News Trucking 8325 Media Reporting Services 40442 Tran Consulting Engineers 1,088.50 Encroachment Permit 40443 Trench Plate Rental 43.75 Equipment Rentals Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 11116101 to 11130/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40444 Truck 6 Auto Supply,Inc. 1,288.21 Truck Supplies 40445 Truesdall Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 Lob Services 40446 Teksystems 8,686.00 Temporary Employment Services 40447 U.S.Filler Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 40448 U.S.Peroxide 12,911.49 Professional Services SP-90 8 Ferrous Chloride 40449 Ultra Scientific 204.58 Lab Supplies 40450 United Parcel Service 951.66 Parcel Services 40451 Unocal 76 43.51 Fuel for Vehicles 40452 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10.400.00 Temporary Employment Service 40453 Vapax,Inc. 4,400.00 Professional Services J-71.7 40454 Verizon California 1.725.44 Telephone Services 40455 VerrWs Plumbing 650.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 40456 Village Nurseries 31.22 Landscaping Supplies 40457 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.291.44 Vision Service Premium 40458 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,011.18 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 40459 The Wackenhut Corporation 2.233,00 Security Guards 40460 Wall Mountain Company, Inc. 29.95 Training Video 40461 Water Environment Federation 111.48 Publications 40462 Waxle Sanitary Supply 526.62 Janitorial Supplies m 40463 Xerox Corporation 8,874.80 Copier Leases X 40464 California Bank 8 Trust 3.266.00 Construction J-33-1.Retention 2 40455 Olsson Construction,Inc. 4,289.00 Construction-Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation W 40466 Robert M.Ball 221.22 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 40467 Catherine M.Bide 102.00 Me9lingrtramirg Expense Reimbursement 00 40468 Chuck M.Forman 1,048.06 Meelingri-raming Expense Reimbursement 40469 Tom E.Gaworski 100.00 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 40470 Randy E. Harris 354.95 Meelintirriaming Expense Reimbursement 40471 Mark H.Kammoto 457.62 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 40472 Robert Ooten 1,651.31 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 40473 Kenneth L. Ramey 100.58 Mestingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 40474 Active Plating 880.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40475 Alphanetics, Inc. 2,948.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40476 Aluminum Precision 50.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40477 Anaheim Memorial Medical Center 1,104.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40478 Anaheim Plating&Polishing 3,202.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40479 Angelica Textile 3.295.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40480 Ano D'Art 1.198.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40481 Aqua-Con 149.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40482 Arrowhead Purtas Water 15.084.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40483 Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc. 698.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40484 Boeing Corporation-Semiconductor 9,064.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40485 Bridgford Foods Corporation 621.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40486 Capro Oil Company 183.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40487 Cargill, Inc. 10,871.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40488 Century Laminators p1 182.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40489 Children's Hospital of Orange County 9,897.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 6 0l 9 e` C Claims Paid From 11/16/01 to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40490 Cosmotronics 743.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40401 Crazy Shirts.Inc. 137.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40492 Culligan Water Conditioning 3.824.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40493 Detalls, Inc.#3 1,207.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40494 Dong Phuong Tofu 316.95 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40495 Electroservices 2000,Inc. 1,166.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40496 Embee,Inc.#3 223.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40497 Eecello Circuits Mfg Co. 106.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40498 Exquisite Design 45.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40499 Gag-OII Production L.L.C. 963.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40500 Georgia Pacific 13,296A3 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40501 Gerard Tile Company USA 1,085.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40502 Goglanian Bakeries 3,334.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40503 High Tech Coatings SF 70.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40504 Hoag Memorial Hospital 1,539.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40505 Hoang Cleaners 718.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40506 Huntington Beach Fire Dept. 428.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40507 Ideal Anodizing 969.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40508 Inlercem 926.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund r71 40509 Kenneth Manusia.Town and Country laundry 402.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund X 40510 Kua T6#Iles,Inc. 1,161.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund = 40511 Lacey Custom Linens 216.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund W 40512 Laro-Plate Tech,Inc. 198.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Zi 40513 Llnco Industries, Inc. 233.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund W 40514 UnOnity Microelectronics,Inc. 4,088.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40515 Loa Angeles Times 11,268.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40516 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA,Inc. 294.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40517 Nelco Products.Inc. 3,972.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40518 City of Newport Beach Utilities 41.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40519 Newport Metal Finishing 119.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40520 Newport Precision Optics Corp. 181.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40521 Nollac Oil Company 133.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40522 Olympic Coating 16AO Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40523 Omni Metal Finishing 606.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40524 Orange County Sanitation District 657.00 Petty Cash Relmb. 40525 Pioneer Circuits,Inc. 3,820.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40526 Precision Circuits West 36.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40527 California Fineblanking Corp. 5,143.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40528 Printronix,Inc. 665.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40529 Pro-Tech 1.633.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40530 Rockwell Semiconductor System 2.657.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40531 Sanmim Corporation(Airway) 408.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40532 Santa Ana Plating 699.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40533 South Coast Circuits#2 198.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40534 Stainless Micro-Pclish 648.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40535 Suxlipse,Inc./Corr Kraft 3,366.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 11116101 to 11/30101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40536 SDC Circuits 387.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40537 City of Tustin Water Service 9.490.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40538 Ultra Pure Metal Finishing 162.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40539 The Water Man 489.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40540 Weber Precision Graphics 42.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 40541 Hampton Tedder Technical Services 31,635.00 Electrical Relays Testing&Maintenance 40542 Orange County Sanitation District 465,335A6 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 40543 Pacific Investment Management Co. 154,341.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 40544 Painewebber Incorporated 32.575.01 COP Remarketing Agreement 40545 A.B.]./V.I.P.Attorney Service 81.61 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 40546 Airgas Safety 1.117.00 Safety Supplies , 40547 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 388.00 Telephone Service 40548 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 75.22 Telephone Service 40549 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 40550 Bondlogistix L.L.C. 2,000.00 Professional Services-Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report 40551 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 40552 Compressor Components of California 2,731.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 405M Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 48.26 Plumbing Supplies 40554 Eagle Aerial Imaging 5,395.00 Software Maintenance Agreement m 40555 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 16,516.78 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-October 2001 X 405M Employment Development Dept 155.00 State Unemployment Tax = 4D557 Environmental Science Associates 8,523.35 Professional Services J-40-5 p0 40558 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 40559 Franchise Tax Board 124.00 Wage Garnishment DO 4056D Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 40561 Industrial Metal Supply 668.73 Metal 40562 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,531.17 Dues Deduction 40563 Kings County Tax Collector 15,140.66 tat Installment Property Taxes 40564 MMAaster-Carr Supply Co. 522.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40WS Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 40566 OCEA 458.12 Dues Deduction 40567 Pacific Bell 92.86 Telephone Services 40568 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 40569 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 40570 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 40571 Premier Fastener Company 23.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 40572 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 924.72 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 40573 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh - 1,657.50 Professional Services-Santa Ana Watershed Project 40574 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 40575 South Coast Environmental Co. 4,513.59 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 40576 Southern California Edison 28.32 Power 40577 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 4.31 Mechanics[Parts&Supplies 40578 Trend Micro, Inc. 1,705.23 Software Maintenance 40579 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 40580 Verban California 82.69 Telephone Services 40581 Xerox Corporation 3.808.04 Copier Leases Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 11116101 to 11/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 40582 James E.Colston 475.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 40583 Andrei loan 180.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 40584 Andrew J.Rmenstraten 335.66 Meeting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 40585 Robert J.Taylor 442.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 40586 Lisa L.Tomko 807.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 40587 Yu-LI Taal 784.80 MeatinglTraining Expanse Reimbursement 40588 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 630.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 40589 CSMFO(CA Society of Muni.Fin.Officers) 25.0D Review Fee-Certification for Outstanding Reporting 40590 Government Finance Officers Association 480.00 Review Fee-Certification for Outstanding Reporting Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,607,015.02 Payroll Disbursements 24931 -25045 Employee Paychecks $ 169,256.78 Biweekly Payroll 11/28/01 25046-25048 Interim Paychecks 1,106.93 Reissue Stale Dated Checks&Adjustment 67241 -97689 Direct Deposit Statements 781.596.61 Biweekly Payroll 11128/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 951,970.32 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Go.of CA $ 340,445.10 November Interest Payment on Sense 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation IT Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 340,445.10 X = Total Claims Paid 11/16/01 -11/30/01 $ 5,899.43044 DO Page 9 of 9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To Bd of Dir. 12 19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a second time extension of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0006, with the City of Huntington Beach. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) implemented the Cooperative Projects Program in 1999. The program provides funds to local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1)to the sewer collection system. • Contract amendments are issued to extend the completion date and invoice submittal date of projects. The program allows only two time extensions of 6 months each. The first extension was included in Amendment No. 1 approved by the General Manager. The second extension is included in proposed Amendment No. 2 and must be approved by the Board of Directors. • The City of Huntington Beach (City)would like additional time to conduct more dry weather flow monitoring to better identify 1/1 sources within the City as part of their Wastewater Master Plan. • In order for the City to complete their Master Plan and identify potential 1/1 sources, it is recommended that a second project extension of 6 months be approved. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The request to extend the project for a second time does not change the contract dollar amount of$200,000 for the District's contribution. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is $142,675,600 and will be spent over the next 18 years on projects that reduce inflow/infiltration (1/1) throughout the Orange County Sanitation District (District). The proposed project change does not impact the project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0006 for the City of Huntington Beach was issued on July 2, 2001,for a total District contribution of$200,000. Amendment No. 1 to the original project schedule included a completion date of January 2, 2002, and an invoice submittal date of February 2, 2002. The proposed Amendment No. 2 for a second time extension would extend the completion date to July 2, 2002, and the invoice submittal date to July 30, 2002. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the time extension. Not approving the time extension would not allow the District to provide funding to the City of Huntington Beach (City)for the completion of the Master Plan and subsequently determine the sources of 1/1 within the City. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. Local agencies are responsible for CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS None PK:jo c wm auuQenaaoera n nm R.yu .l9oamn d.Repxu\t]OfWem9(e�ccopnsuwngeoc Page 2 i Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2001 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 5, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Don Bankhead Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Tony Kawashima Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Ken Blake Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Services Manager Deirdre Hunter Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Pat McGuigan, Chair Others: Mark A. Murphy Anna Piercy Randy Fuhrman (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 December 5, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the November 7, 2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. Director Ken Blake abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Vice Chair Ferryman reported he would be chairing the meeting due to Chair McGuigan's absence. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the progress on the District's agreement with SAWPA regarding the relocation and improvements to the Santa Ana River Line. A project was completed under budget to make sure the manholes in the river are adequately protected, as well as building access roads. A method for developing a cost-sharing agreement for the engineering value work for future improvements will be a key component of the MOU which should be coming to the January board meeting for approval. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. OMTS01-52 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. b. OMTS01-53 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report,which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 7(a)through (b) under Consent Calendar. (8) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS01-54 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart, Garcia and von Langan Engineers to provide engineering services for Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study, Project SP-74, for a total amount not to exceed $80,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 December 5, 2001 b. OMTS01-55 Recommend to the Board of Directors to award a contract for Custodial Maintenance Services, Specification No. S-2001-58, to US Metro Group, Inc. for the period of February 4, 2002 through February 3, 2003, for a total contract amount not to exceed $320,000, including four one-year renewal options. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTS01-56 Not used (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTSO1-57 Ocean Discharge Issues Update Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, referred the Directors to a memo distributed to the Directors that evening from Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, regarding the outreach opportunities over the past month. The Directors were referred to a chart given to them that evening that outlined the timetable for the renewal of the ocean discharge permit. Staff plans to have additional information during March-April of 2002, and the next public workshop will be held at that time. Mr. Ghirelli suggested that this would be the timeframe for Directors to schedule study sessions or briefings for their city councils and staff. b. OMTS01-58 Belt Press Research Retrofit Equipment Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager, updated the Directors on the research project, which was to enhance the dewatered biosolids'solid content by at least 4% through the installation of a dewatering belt press retrofit unit. Upon successful evaluation of the project, the District was to buy the equipment for$125,000. The research retrofit equipment achieved only a 2% increase in cake solids. Staff has declined the discounted price offered by the vendor, and the vendor has been requested to remove the retrofit unit. C. OMTS01-59 Regional Water Quality Control Board's New Wastewater Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewers Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Services Manager, updated the Directors on the new wastewater discharge requirements the California Regional Water Quality Control Board has developed. These new requirements are expected to be approved by the Regional Board in February 2002. Director Bankhead requested that staff ask the Regional Board to consider providing funding in order for the cities and agencies to implement the new standards. I Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 December 5, 2001 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of InformationTechnology, reported the Distriers network system will be replaced in the near future. The project will be coming to the Board of Directors for approval in May or June 2002. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported bids were received on natural gas in August,which will result in annual savings of$1.8 million. (12) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, gave a brief update on the ICOR project. At the November board meeting, staff requested the escrow process be extended for up to three months. A recommendation was going to come to the OMTS Committee this evening to ask for approval of the project. During preparation of the final report and review by the Executive Management Team, there were several details that needed to be clarified, thus the request to extend the due diligence. Some of the major issues staff is taking a closer look at are marketing issues and cost issues. (13) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present. (14) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (15) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none OMTS COMMITTEE �� To Bd.d Uir. tyosroi I�rt9iai AGENDA REPORT I IW" N oa+tsot-st 'rber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Originator: Michelle Hetherington SUBJECT: ACTIVATED SLUDGE AERATION BASIN SELECTOR STUDY, PROJECT SP-74 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart, Garcia, and von Langan Engineers to provide engineering services for Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study, Project SP-74, for a total amount not to exceed $80,000.00. SUMMARY • Project SP-74 (FY 2000/2001)was budgeted and approved by the Board to study operating the activated sludge system in an anaerobic selector mode. • Staff recommends awarding Cathcart, Garcia, von Langen (CGvL) a professional services agreement to design a mixing system in two aeration basins as described in the scope of work. The professional services are for plans, specifications, bidding documents and related services. • Proposals were sent to four engineering firms for the design of a mixing system for an anaerobic selector study. CGvL is the only firm that responded. • A review team of four engineers reviewed CGvL's proposal. It meets all of the requirements in the scope of work and the cost of$79,916.00 is below the estimated cost for these services and the approved budget amount for the project. • Anaerobic selector technology is an enhancement to the District's Secondary Treatment Plant designed to provide staff with a tool to manage the type of bacteria used in secondary treatment. This tool will improve microbe capture, increase plant stability and provide a consistent and improved effluent water quality for the Orange County Water District Ground Water Replenishment Project. In addition, the project will reduce energy. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The engineering services will not exceed $79,916.00. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted (Budget Line item: Section 8 — Page 67) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • A mixer will be installed in the first stage of two aeration basins for the study. The mixer will operate without the introduction of air into the basins creating an anaerobic condition. This anaerobic system provides staff with a tool to manage the type of microorganisms used in the secondary treatment plants. • Firms that received a request for proposal were: - CGvL - Brown & Caldwell Engineers - Carollo Engineers - R. W. Beck Engineers ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS N/A MAE:pjm G1wp.dtz\agenda\Board Agenda Repods\2001 Board Agenda RewrtSUMUtem 11(c).SP74.doc G Yq.EIa\rypWHv0/vpMS Rgvts2W1 Bwmnpega Fepvn\f AtWen\t(c15t7�Erc amo\ Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE ""tl g°'� T°2/ig/O 1 17/5/01 12/39/01 AGENDA REPORT Iran NurOv ReM Nu ba o"i501-55 11(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Chuck Forman, Senior Facilities Supervisor SUBJECT: CUSTODIAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT , SPECIFICATION NO. S-2001-58 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Award a contract for Custodial Maintenance Services, Specification No. S-2001-58,to US Metro Group, Inc. for the period of February 4, 2002 through February 3, 2003, for a total contract amount not to exceed $320,000, including four one-year renewal options. SUMMARY • Staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP)for custodial maintenance services and recommended a contract award to U. S. Metro Inc. • The recommended contract award for$320,000 exceeds the $270,000 amount approved by the Board of Directors in the budget. The recommended contract amount is higher due to an increase in the scope of services for facilities requiring custodial services requested in the new RFP. • On September 2001, an evaluation team of 5 District staff reviewed proposals submitted from 4 companies for the Custodial Maintenance Services, Specification No. S-2001-58. • The following criteria were used in the evaluation process to select the company that scored the highest combined ratings in the following areas: - Oualification of Firm - Staffing and Project Organization - Work Plan - Completeness of Response - Cost • The evaluation summary indicates that U.S. Metro Inc. received the No. # 1 ranking with a total score of 890 out of a possible 1,000. • The evaluation team recommends awarding this contract to U.S. Metro Inc. and increasing the budgeted funds due to expansion of the scope of work. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY New contract amount is $320,000 to cover the increases in scope and eliminate change orders over the contract period. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section 5, page 12 ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • In 1998, the District awarded Corporate Image Maintenance the Custodial Maintenance Service Contract as the lowest bidder for Specification No. 9899-09. • During this time,the District continued to employ full-time custodial personnel. • Beginning in 1999, the District's custodial maintenance services at both facilities (Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley)were entirely outsourced. • Due to the elimination of District custodial staff, the current contract Specification No. 9899-09 continues to increase both in costs and the scope of work. ALTERNATIVES • Decrease in scope of work, causing an increase of supervision by District staff. • Hire janitorial personnel. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS None BC:pjm G1wp.dtatagendMBcard Agenda Repots'2001 Board Agenda Reports\1201Vtem 11(d).Custodial Maintenance doc G:w�G•UYndl0alra npaae FmvLLt2oot ece,enemaa flegti\12atU1M1 nal CVSINuIM ni —dn Page 2 V �! DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Brady Gary Streed, Director of Finance Guy Carroao Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Brian Donahue John Linder, Construction Manager Alice Jempsa Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Beth Krom Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Tod Ridgeway Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair - Mark Esquer, Operations & Maintenance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Manager William Cassidy, Project Manager Directors Absent: Brian Bingham, Project Engineer Russell Patterson,Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Randy Fuhnnan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the November 1, 2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as revised to reflect a name change. 0 PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 December 6, 2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson reminded the members that there would not be a meeting in January. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director Tod Ridgeway asked that staff prepare a report on state of our sewer lines throughout the service area. While the Strategic Plan identified hydraulic deficiencies, it did not address the actual physical state of the sewer lines. Staff will present this report in a couple of months. The December 11 meeting of the SARI Joint Management Committee has been cancelled because more work is necessary on the MOU. General Counsel Tom Woodruff is preparing a report on options available to the District regarding the terms of the 1972 agreement with SAWPA. Director Eckenrode again expressed his concern about the lack of cooperation from SAWPA regarding their position on the SARI improvements. Director Steve Anderson said that he was concerned about the costs to the Orange County rate payers for treating Flow from outside the county. Mr. Ludwin reported that Brown and Caldwell has begun evaluating additional alternatives. The Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department has stated in the past that they have some financial responsibility for the protection or relocation of SARI that is necessary as a result of the raising of Prado Dam. Mr. Anderson directed staff not to agree to any changes in the MOU that lock the District into something that isn't acceptable. Any agreement reached through negotiations between staffs will be presented to the Directors for approval. Mr. Ludwin reported on the 50,000-gallon spill in Newport Beach,of which 10,000 gallons eventually went to the ocean forcing closure of the beach. Construction Manager John Linder described the activities since the spill was reported and the planned repairs as well as replacement of additional portions of the line because of corrosion that has been found in the lined ductile iron pipe. It is thought that the high sulfide content of the oil field discharge might be the problem. The pipe was installed about 10-12 years ago and normally has a life of 50 years. Staff has identified corrosion problems in the other two force mains in that area and they will also be replaced with PVC pipe. The General Manage reported that a task force has been formed to look at this situation to see if this is a single case or not If there are other contusion problems in the District, they will be evaluated and steps will be taken to prevent it from happening again. Director Ridgeway complimented staff on its response. Mr. Ludwin introduced Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor,who has joined the District as a specialist in instrumentation and controls. ! PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 December 6, 2001 (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Director of Engineering David Ludwin discussed the materials left by Communications Manager Lisa Murphy on the community outreach activities for several construction projects. Mr. Ludwin will be making a presentation to the Huntington Beach City Council on December 17 on the Bushard Trunk replacement project. He reported that the staffs of the District and the city have been working together on the design and traffic plans. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR(Items a-e) a. Receive and file Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). There are two change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. b. Receive and file the PSA and Addenda Report. There were no PSAs and two Addenda approved by the General Manager from October 19 through November 22, 2001. C. Receive and file the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. d. Receive and file the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)Relocation and Protection Status Report. e. PDC01-79 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 6 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P146-2,and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No.J-53,with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$42,921 and a time extension of 355 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$2.672,141. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (a)under Consent Calendar. (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e) a. PDC01-80 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37,with Margate Construction, authorizing changes to the contract requirements relative to value engineering and insurance requirements,with no change to the contract amount. This item is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Board Resolution No. 99-23. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 December 6, 2001 David Ludwin described the value engineering clause that is being added to the contract. It will allow the contractor an incentive to find less costly alternatives without reducing the quality or function of the constructed facility. The District and the contractor will share the savings. Engineering Supervisor Chris Cervellone explained the changes in the insurance industry since September 11 and the impacts to the District. Because of the increases quoted for Builders All-risk and Earthquake insurance staff, general counsel and the contractor evaluated the project for varying degrees of actual risk and recommended reducing the level of earthquake insurance coverage. b. PDC01-81 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation providing for additional engineering services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76,for an additional amount of$1,764,270, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,114,479. Engineering Supervisor Matt Smith described the alternatives evaluated for rehabilitating the trickling filters. The recommended alternative will required additional design work to replace the existing trickling filters with new biofilters on the existing footprint. A new pumping station and power building will also be required. The existing system was built in the 60s and rehabilitation or replacement would have to be done with or without the GWRS project. C. PDC01-82 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate with the Coast Community College District to establish a joint project agreement to be approved by the Board of Directors in connection with the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate with International Bay Clubs, Inc.for the purchase of real properties located at 1700 to 2000 West Pack Coast Highway, Newport Beach for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50. Project Manager William Cassidy described the pros and cons of the locations that were considered for this replacement pump station. Director Ridgeway asked staff to consider the zoning and general plan issues with city staff. d. PDC01-83 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RW Beck, Inc.for design PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 December 6, 2001 and construction support for Contract Nos. 3-52, 5-53, 5.54, and 11-28, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$186,105, increasing the total amount not to exceed $685,405. e. PDC01-84 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No. J-67, providing for additional engineering services for final design and construction support phases for an additional amount of$735,509, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,132,937. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Guy Carroao announced that this meeting was his last PDC Committee meeting. Blake Anderson thanked Director Carroao for his service over the last two years and staled that he will be missed. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 7, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. t PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 December 6, 2001 Submitted by. V✓1L/ U 46ad Tappan D Committee Secretary Gfu94�N6vksVIDW I PoGRaR Wetleslrc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date Toad.or Dlr. 12/O6/Ol 12/19/Ol AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number poo01 9 12(C) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: CHEMICAL FACILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P1-46-2, AND CHEMICAL FLOW PACING FOR PRIMARY INFLUENT, JOB NO. J-53 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$42,921 and a time extension of 355 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $2,672,141. SUMMARY Background • This project permanently replaces the chlorine odor control and plant water disinfecting at Plant No. 1 with hydrogen peroxide and bleach facilities, and replaces four existing ferric chloride pumps, which have reached the end of their useful life. • The plans and specifications were prepared by Black and Veatch, and the contract was awarded to SS Mechanical Corporation on April 28, 1999. The contract is 99% complete. • Change Order No. 6 includes five items of added work to Job No. P1-46-2, two items of added work to Job No. J-53, and one item for a time extension of 355 calendar days. There are two omission items. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date June 22, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date June 22, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 6 Current Contract Completion Date February 1, 2002 Anticipated Completion Date February 1, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 f Change Order No. 6 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Revise RJN Numbers $12,131 0 Desi n Change 2 Bleach station bench test 4,357 0 Design Change programmingchanges 3 Bleach station panel and 3-way pump 6,581 0 Design Change valve modifications 4 H2O,PLC programming changes 1,453 0 Design Change 5 Furnish and install lockout/tagout 1,131 0 Omission devices 6 Ferric chloride level control 15,538 0 Omission modifications 7 Ferric chloride flow switch drains 1,730 0 Design Change 8 Time Extension 0 355 Design Change Total —Change Order No. 6 $42,921 355 Item 8 provides for 355 calendar days of non-compensible time extension for items in Change Order No. 6 plus other delays in previously issued contract change orders. These delays include additional time to complete District issued change orders, changes to programming Submittals, issues related to District instrumentation equipment, and wiring issues discovered during startup of the pump stations. The Contractor has agreed not to file a claim for extended overhead for this and any future time extensions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $2,229,251.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 399,969.00 This Change $ 42,921.00 Change Orders to Date $ 442,890.00 Percentage Increase to Date 19.87% Final Contract Price $2,672,141.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 5F, CIP Reclamation Plant No. 1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None G:Wq.EbapmEaBw,U Agene.RevIVWJ a WA9e 8aP INIVmn 12(c).NA< 2.a Page 2 Y ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order JBF:lc G.w ..ftaWda�Hamm wmm Imam Hamm u(c),Ple ,¢ Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Chemical Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1 JOB NOS. P1-46-2 AND J-53 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTfIASK - AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design $ 622.900 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 100% Project Development $ 163,400 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 100% Studies/Permiffing 1 $ 3,000 1 $ 3.090 1 - $ 3,000 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 100% Construction Contract $ 2,567,200 $ 2,802,000 $ 2,802,000 $ 2,629,220 $ 42,921 $ 2,672,141 $ 2,603.847 97% Construction Administration $ 507,200 $ 642,000 $ 642,000 - $ 642,000 $ 642,000 $ 627,022 98% Construction Inspection $ 46,200 $ 574,000 $ 574,000 $ 574.000 $ 574,000 $ 532,053 93% Contingency $ 328,400 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 4,235.300 1 $ 4,536,000 1 1 $ 4,536,000 1 1 $ 4,333,220 1 $ 42,9211 $ 4,376,141 $ 4,250.922 97% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4,235,300 1 $ 4,536,000 1 $ - 1 $ 4,530,000 $ 4,333,220 $ 42,921 $ 4,376,141 $ 4.250,922 97% p;twp dmknp4obaandconlracm%pt-48.2khanpeordersbudgeltbl.c45 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT CHEMICAL FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND CHEMICAL FLOW PACING FOR PRIMARY INFLUENT JOB NOS. P1-46-2 AND J-53 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/22/99 $ 2,229,251.00 $ 2,229,251.00 0.00% 365 365 CO NO. 1' 6/30/00 $ 89.742.00 $ 2,318,993.00 4.03% 124 489 CO NO. 2" 8/3/00 $ 84.166.00 $ 2,403,159.00 7.80% 0 489 CO NO. 3 11/15/00 $ 125,074.00 $ 2,528,233.00 13.41% 105 1 594 CO NO. 4" 2128/01 $ 75,614.00 $ 2,603,847.00 16.80% 0 594 CO NO. 5 6/27/01 $ 25,373.00 $ 2,629,220.00 17.94% 5 599 CO NO. 6 Pending $ 42.921.00 $ 2672,141.00 19.87% 355 954 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolutlon 99-23 "Approved by PVC par delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 g:\wpdtalelgyobsandconbadeb-l.4 2khangeordemtb status.report v Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: Dec. 19. 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. Pt-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dedust) $ 42,921.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-46-2 ITEM 1 —REVISE RJN NUMBERS The Contractor was directed to furnish labor to revise the RJN number database to new OCSD standards for all programming on both Job No. P1-46-2 and Job No. J-53. An RJN number is the unique 11-character equipment loop tag number assigned to each piece of electrically operated equipment on the project. The Contractor was required to change approximately 9,600 numbers in the database on 5 separate programmable logic controller(PLC) programs. OCED Engineering and Maintenance Departments revised the RJN number database for all listed equipment in the District to a new standard. These numbers were changed from the numbers listed in the original contract. The additional programming was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff and included costs for programming and engineering. Contract time impacts associated with this item are included in Item 8. This work was not Included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a)of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 38) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,131.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— BLEACH STATION BENCH TEST ADDITIONAL PROGRAMMING The Contractor was directed to furnish labor to perform additional programming to the programmable logic controller(PLC) for the Bleach Station at Plant No.1 as follows: 1. Calculated flow setpoint range 2. Standby pump auto run conditions 3. Backfeed reference flow to manually entered flow rate for bumpless transfer 4. Reference flow transfer from duty pump to standby pump This additional programming was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff as the result of the programming bench test, and included costs for additional programming and engineering. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 39) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,357.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days W Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six(6) Date: Dec. 19. 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P146-2 and Chemical Flow Pacino for Primary Influent, Job No.J-53 ITEM 3—BLEACH STATION PANEL AND 3-WAY PUMP VALVE MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish labor and material to perform the following modifications to the Bleach Station: 1. Relocate plant water flow indicating transmitter adjacent to the pump controller and add 100 feet of electrical conduit and conductors. 2. Relocate standby pump 3-way valve to the standby RAS pump"B', add 10 feet of electrical conduit and conductors, and reprogram valve in the programmable logic controller(PLC). 3. Remove the "motor run" light from the 3-way valve control panel and change the engraving on the selector switch. The above additional work was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO Nos. 41,46 and 48) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,581.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— HYDROGEN PEROXIDE (H2O2) PLC PROGRAMMING AND ENGINEERING CHANGES The Contractor was directed to furnish labor to perform additional programming to the programmable logic controllers (PLC) at Plant No. 1 as follows: 1. Add standby auto run command to the Grit chamber, Sunflower, Primary Scrubbers, and Headworks Scrubbers H2O2 pump station PLC's. 2. Add diversion valve COS logic modification to the grit chamber PLC 3. Add time delay for pump station auto run command for the Grit Chamber and Sunflower H2O2 pump station PLC's. The Contractor was also directed to delete programming to the programmable logic controllers (PLC) for the existing Headworks and Primary Scrubbers hydrogen peroxide (1-1:02) pump stations at Plant No. 1. The above changes to the work were requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO Nos. 42, 44 and 45) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,453.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days y Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT . 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: Dec. 19, 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacina for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 ITEM 5—FURNISH AND INSTALL LOCKOUT/TAGOUT DEVICES The Contractor was directed to fumish and install 13 IockouUtagoul devices on the push-pull power disconnect switches as follows: 1. 1 each — Bleach Station, Headworks Scrubbers Pump Station, and Primary Scrubbers Pump Station 2. 10 each—Influent Pump Station The above IockouUtagoul devices were required to be added by the District Safety Department. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,131.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. J-53 ITEM 6—FERRIC CHLORIDE LEVEL CONTROL MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed furnish and install electrical conduit and conductors to connect the new contract specified Milltronics Multiranger Plus level control to control panel FTP201 at the Ferric Chloride Pump Station at Plant No. 1. The work included fumishing and installing 200 feet of 1-inch and ''%-inch conduit and 30,000 feet of conductors. The conduit and conductors were shown as existing on the Contract Drawings but could not be located in the field. Also included in this item are costs for additional engineering and programming the Ferric Chloride Pump Station PLC to rescale the level transmitter and add additional logic for the duty pump being offline. The additional programming was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO Nos. 30 and 43) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,538.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7— FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOW SWITCH DRAINS The Contractor was directed to fumish and install a relief drain system for the four flow switches installed on the new Ferric Chloride Pump Station at Plant No. 1. The work included fumishing and installing four 1-inch ball valves, 30 feel of 2-inch and 20 feet of 1-inch schedule 80 PVC pipe. The flow switches would not reset due to the inability to drain ferric chloride chemical out of the closed piping loop under each flow switch and the new drain system provided this relief. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 40) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1.730.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days u Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six(6) Date: Dec. 19. 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 Job Nos. P146-2 and J53 ITEM 8— CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION The Contractor is granted a 355 calendar day, non compensable time extension for Item Nos. 1, 3 and 5 of Contract Change Order No. 5 and Item Nos. 1,2,3,4 and 6 of Contract Change Order No. 6 plus other delays to previously issued contract change orders. These delays include additional time to complete District issued change orders; changes to programming submittals; issues related to District instrumentation equipment; and equipment and electrical and instrumentation wiring issues discovered during startup of the pump stations. This time extension was negotiated with the Contractor with the agreement of waiving all contractor home office overhead associated with this time extension pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: Contract schedule update dated October 15, 2001) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 355 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $42,921.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 355 Calendar Days J Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six(6) Date: Dec. 19, 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. Pt-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 355 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 22, 1999 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 22, 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 355 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 589 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 954 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 1, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 2,229,251.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 399,969.00 This Change (Add) (Beduot) $ 42,921.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,672,141.00 Page 6 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Six(6) Date: Dec. 19, 2001 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 Board Authorization Date: December 19, 2001 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SS MECHANICAL CORPORATION Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE MeebngDate To ad.of dr. 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number GDCDI-81 12ctl1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Brian Bingman, Project Manager SUBJECT: TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS, JOB NO. P1-76 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black& Veatch Corporation providing for additional engineering services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an additional amount of$1,764,270, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,114,479. SUMMARY • The 1999 Strategic Plan identifies a need to rehabilitate the existing trickling filters and add new trickling filter clarifiers. • OCSD retained Black &Veatch Corporation (B&V)to perform engineering services for the design and construction support for the trickling filters and new clarifiers. • The original scope of work required B&V to design the rehabilitation of the trickling filter facility and complete a study comparing rehabilitation with a new facility. • B&V conducted an extensive study to compare rehabilitation of the new trickling filters with complete replacement of the facility. B&V recommended we proceed with a new facility in the same footprint as the existing trickling filters. • Addendum No. 1 with B&V consists of the following additional work items: 1. Design of a new trickling filter facility including two deep bed trickling filters and two circular clarifiers 2. Design of a new trickling filter pump station 3. Design of a new power building to support the increased electrical demand of the new trickling filters 4. Design new primary effluent pipeline which will feed into the trickling filter facility 5. Design of complete ventilation system for the new trickling filters c +neaaw•+`aose Maw Reqt52W t emmnpeaa Ramsuuim,zlal•aeveaw,_mc - R—. MWI Page 1 6. Complete Odor and air toxic modeling and incorporate the results into the new trickling filter facility 7. Comply with new District Engineering Design Standards PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total proposed budget for the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, is $44,750,000. Authorization of an additional $1,764,270 for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is being requested, increasing the total authorization to $4,114,479. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Transfer of funds is being requested as follows: $1,764,270 for Consultant PSA, $2,000 for Project Development, and $35,000 for Studies/Permitting. The overall project budget will remain unchanged. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Proiect Background An extensive study of the trickling filters has been completed, comparing the following three options: 1. Rehabilitation of existing four 180-foot diameter trickling filters. Replacing the rock media with plastic media. 2. Replacement of trickling filters with two 166-foot diameter units with 14-foot media depth (media volume equal to existing trickling filter). 3. Replacement of trickling filters with two 166-foot diameter units with 20-foot media depth. The study compared the cost of the facility, effluent quality at various Flows, cost per million gallons to produce high quality effluent (GWR System requirement), present worth cost of the facility, including Operations and Maintenance costs for the next 20 years, and area required for facility. The replacement option has the lowest overall lifecycle cost and was recommended by Black & Veatch. c rry EutpeiWtBv,E npe,w Pepe,t010e1 ewe/yi.W eeptN\1m1Wn tx(al���� n .ua: erxia, Page 2 a The District agreed with Black&Veatch's recommendation to select the third option, replacement, and has now proceeded through the Preliminary Design Report phase. The additional scope items for Job No. P1-76, include the following: t. New Trickling Filters. The selected option requires the complete design of trickling filters including new walls, piping, layout, etc. 2. New trickling filter pump station. A new pump station is required to convey water to the taller trickling filters at a peak hydraulic capacity of 75 MGD. 3. New Power Building No. 8. With the increased load required by the taller filters, there is a significant increase in electrical demand requiring a dedicated trickling filter power building. 4. Primary Effluent Pipeline. A new pipeline will be designed from the effluent of Primary Clarifiers 6-31 to the trickling filter pump station. 5. Ventilation of the trickling filters. The current trickling filters use natural currents for oxygen supply to the microorganisms. The new trickling filters will have a deeper media bed and will require forced ventilation. 6. Odor Modeling and Air Emissions Study. With the addition of two large diameter deep bed trickling fitters, it is necessary to study the odor and potential toxins released from the new facility. 7. Additional work required by latest version of Engineering Design Guidelines. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the previously approved 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report(EIR). The 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Request from Black &Veatch Corporation for Additional Work Items BEB:jo G:wymeapeMc,Bema ApmNRw�a,Mm Bova�paNa xepmn,tD,wm,�Ml9eaVeamnrc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS JOB NO. PI-76 CURRENT; N 8 11-ii; 11"Itopopifil", TED �E % I KE 3UDOU it AMON ATE 40 J Project Development $ 13.000 $ 40,000 E 2,000 IS 42.000 $ 40,000 $ 2.000 $ 42.000 $ 41,738 99% Studies/Penritling 1 $ 58,000 $ 6,000 1 $ 35,000 $ 41.000 $ 6,000 $ 35.000 $ 41.000 $ 41,391 101% Consultant PSA $ 1.200,000 $ 2,350,209 1,764.270 $ 4,114,479 $ 2,350,209 $ 1,764,270 $ 4.114.479 $ 899.143 22% Design Staff $ 280,000 $ 282,000 $ 282,000 $ 260,000 $ 260,000 $ 187,685 67% Construction Contract $ 13,100,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ Constwellon Administration $ 969,000 $ 1,933.000 $ 1,933,000 $ Construction Inspection I $ 528.000 1 $ 1,139,000 $ 1.139.000 $ Contingency $ 4.852.000 $I 9.000.000 $ (1,801,270)1 $ 7.198,730 $9,000-C PROJECTTOTAL $ 21.000.000 $ 44,750,209 $ $ 44.750,209 $ 2.676,209 $ 1,801,270 1 $ 4.477.4791 $ 1.169,9571 iReimbursable Costs I I I I I I I I I IPROJECTNET 1 $ 21,000,000 1 $ 44.750,209 1 $ $ 44,750.209 11$ 2,676.209 1 $ 1,801,270 j $ 4,477,479 1 $ 1.169,9571 EDWIPI-mAaends Repod PrevaramonAgend.It.wIft.nda RepodlilLelgal Table for Addendum No I Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers Job No. P1-76 Total Project Budget: $44,750,000 Consultant: Black & Veatch Corporation Start Date of Project: January 3, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 12/20/2000 Original PSA Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New $2,350,209 $2,350,209 Clarifiers Provide Additional Preliminary and Final Pending Addendum No. 1 Design Work for New Trickling Filter $1,764,270 $4,114,479 Facility EDMSAXPt-76t02 Agenda Report Preparatlon'Agenda ReportNgenda ReportWSA Statue Report.doc BEB: U BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION EXHIBIT"A" MEMORANDUM Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 OCSD Job No. P1-76 November 21,2001 Addendum 1 To: Brian Bingman,OCSD Project Manager From: Ralph Eberts, Project Manager In response to your request,this memorandum summarizes the additional tasks and estimated costs included in Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers,Job No. Pl- 76. The following items describe proposed additions and modifications to the Scope of Work and the additional costs associated with these tasks. 1.0 New Trickling Filters The original scope of work for the project assumed that the four existing trickling filters would be rehabilitated and that new clarifiers would be constructed at one of two nearby locations. However,as a result of the evaluations conducted during preliminary design the decision was made by the District to demolish the existing trickling filters and to construct two new trickling filters and clarifiers within the same footprint as the existing filters. Additional effort is therefore required to prepare contract documents for demolishing the existing facilities,and constructing new filters and clarifiers within the same area. A total of 4,638 hours are estimated for this additional effort. Estimated Additional Fees $489,870 2.0 New Trickling Filter Pump Station The original scope of work assumed that the existing trickling filter pump station would also be rehabilitated in its current location. As the alternatives were developed and evaluated, it was decided that a new pump station would be constructed in a new location and that the inlet structure to the existing trickling filter pump station would be rehabilitated. The additional effort estimated for the design of a new pump station is 3,544 hours. Estimated Additional Fees $374,350 BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION MEMORANDUM Page 2 Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 Request for Additional Funds November 21,2001 3.0 New Power Building No. 8/12kV Service Center Interface/Emergency Generator The original scope of work for the project indicated that the trickling filter facilities could be served with power from either existing Power Building No. 2 or 7. However, an investigation revealed that for the loads required for the new facilities neither building as currently exists or designed,could accommodate the additional power requirements. As a result,the power will have to be obtained directly from the 12kV Service Center feeders and a new power building and transformers will be required. It is estimated that an additional 3740 hours of design effort will be required for this new task. Estimated Additional Fees $395,320 4.0 Primary Effluent Pipeline(Trickling Filters Pump Station Influent)and Junction Box The original scope of work for the project indicated that a 48-inch pipeline running from the Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 to the influent structure of the existing trickling filter pump station would be constructed under District Project No. P1-37. However,during preliminary design it was determined that the 48-inch pipe may be undersized and that the pipe should be included in the design of the trickling filter project. Therefore,the District deleted the pipeline from Project No. P 1-37 and added the work to this project. Additionally, it was determined that a new Primary Effluent Junction Box would be required at the junction of the existing pipelines from Primary Clarifiers No. I-5 and the new pipeline. An additional 808 hours are estimated for design of the new pipeline and junction box. Estimated Additional Fees $85,360 BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION 0 MEMORANDUM Page 3 Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 Request for Additional Funds November 21,2001 5.0 Trickling Filter Effluent to PEPS The original scope of work anticipated that the effluent from the trickling filters would become the supply to the GWR System. However, the District expressed the desire to also have flexibility to route the flow to the primary effluent pump station(PEPS). The flexibility will be accommodated with additional piping,junction structures, and diversion gates. It is estimated that an additional 849 hours of design effort will be needed to obtain this requested flexibility. Estimated Additional Fees $89,690 6.0 Secondary Clarifier Sludge/Scum Discharge To Multiple Locations For the original scope, it was assumed that the sludge and scum from the secondary clarifiers would be discharged to a single location within the plant. The existing trickling filters that were to be rehabilitated currently discharge to the primary clarifiers. However,an evaluation was performed of alternative routing and discharge locations for the sludge and scum and the decision was made to mute the discharge to three different locations. The additional design effort to route the sludge and scum to the two extra locations is 170 hours. Estimated Additional Fees $18,120 7.0 Ventilation of Trickling Filters The original scope of work stated that it should be assumed that the trickling filters would be uncovered. However, in discussions with the District there was agreement that it would be prudent to design the trickling filters such that geodesic domes and odor control could be installed at a later date. The additional design hours anticipated to design the filter to accommodate future geodesic domes and odor control systems is 578 hours. Estimated Additional Fees $61,060 PDC COMMITTEE Meebn9 Date Te Bd.0f Dir. 12/06/01 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number PDC01-82 12(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-50 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate with the Coast Community College District to establish a joint project agreement to be approved by the Board of Directors in connection with the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate with Intemalional Bay Clubs, Inc.for the purchase of real properties located at 1700 to 2000 West Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50. SUMMARY • In January 1999, MacDonald-Stephens Engineering (MSE), completed an assessment of the Rocky Point Pump Station as part of Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37. The report recommended replacing the station. • In April 2000, the Orange County Sanitation District(District)entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Lee & Ro, Inc. for design and construction support services for replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station. The PSA Scope of Work(SOW)also required a Siting Study to determine a location for the new station. • In July 2001, the District completed its review of Lee& Ro's draft Siting Report. The draft report covered four possible sites: 1. The current location at the westerly end of the Balboa Bay Club (Club) owned by the City of Newport Beach (City). 2. A second location within the Club, adjacent to the new parking garage at the easterly end of the City's property. 3. The parking lot/ landscape area of Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship (School) immediately west of the Club. The School is a division of the Coast Community College District. The County of Orange owns the property. 4. International (Balboa) Bay Clubs, Inc. properties, 1700 to 2000 West Pacific Coast Highway(PCH), Newport Beach, north of PCH, across from the School. The draft report also notes the School's shelved project to construct parking (Phase 1)and classrooms (Phase 2) on the International Bay Clubs, Inc.'s properties. • In September 2001, the Director of the School and District staff met to discuss their pending projects. The School's project would depend principally on access across PCH.(pedestdan bridge or traffic lights)and total cost. The District's project depends principally on access to property and its cost. • The School has determined their project is feasible as a joint effort with the District.The District's pump station would incorporate the design of School's pedestrian bridge/parking lot (Phase 1)with plans for the future classroom building (Phase 2). • The International Bay Clubs, Inc.'s properties could serve both projects, reducing costs for both. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, would need to be increased by$800,000 to amount not to exceed $5,199,000, should an agreement be reached and properties acquired. The funds to purchase an easement or real property were not included in the original budget. The properties were appraised as part of the Siting Study. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget, Section 8, Page 27) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No budget amendment is being request at this time. A budget increase will be requested once agreements have been negotiated for a joint project with the Coast Community College District and a purchase of property from the International Bay Clubs. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Rocky Point Pump Station is a 20-foot diameter, below grade, reinforced concrete facility, equipped with three sewage pumps. Its motor control center(MCC) is above grade, atop the station. The station is located within the Balboa Bay Club (Club), adjacent to the condominiums at the westerly end of the property. Entrance to the station is through the Club's main gate. Refer to Figures 1 and 2 attached. The station has been upgraded twice since built in 1937. The wet well was repaired and lined in 1966 to protect the walls and ceiling from the corrosive environment. Variable speed drives were installed in 1992 to match the pumps' discharge to the flow entering the station. The assessment report recommended replacing the existing station principally due to the lack of space for pumps capable of meeting projected peak wet weather flows. Additionally, the station can not be rehabilitated to provide the means of egress as required by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 101)for existing structures. A new station would remedy the existing deficiencies, not meeting national and state codes and Orange County Sanitation District's (District) latest standards for pump stations. Either replacement or rehabilitation of the existing station would require the addition of a standby generator as protection against a sewage spill due to a loss of power. G.M.`apmOa�n lierrt QWIB 1v npmaa Xeruts�t3pt,llern Ixlel sso.eec a..,..¢ e 1 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES The District could choose to pursue the other or additional sites for a new pump station. The District would find opposition from the staffs of the International Bay Clubs, Inc., City of Newport Beach and Orange County's Board of Supervisors. CEQA FINDINGS Constructing a new Rocky Point Pump Station and/or classrooms and parking lot for the School of Sailing and Seamanship requires a Negative Declaration to be published, approved by both District's Boards and filed with the County Clerk. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Figure 1, Project Location Map 4. Figure 2, Existing Station 5. Figure 3, Proposed Site WC:jo:nlc G:tW4M*8Me\BoxE A ft Repw W'B WAQe Fep 120111g 12(e)&W.-0 Nw : a , Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 41,000 $ 1.000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 100% Studies/Permifting $ 8,000 $ 17.000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 496,000 $ 345.000 $ - $ 345,000 $ 344,679 $ - $ 344.678 1 $ 67,000 19% Design Staff $ 157.000 $ 539,000 $ 539,0D0 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 4,000 4% Construction ContE$ 2,273,000 $ 2.273,000 $ 2.273.000 $Construction Administration ,000 $ 294,000 $ 294.000 $ Construction Ins ectlon ,000 $ 233,000 $ 233,000 $ Contin en 000 $ 697,000 $ - $ 697.000 $ PROJECT TOTA ,000 $ 4.399,000 $ - $ 4,399,000 - $ 451,679 $ - $ 451,679 $ 89,000 20% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4,124.000 1 $ 4,399,000 $ - 1 $ 4,399,000 11 $ 451.679 1 $ - $ 451.679 1 $ 89,000 20% -Protect Development completed under Corded No,2.37.Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations C:10aasidyei-50 Roclty Pt PSWRV6-50 Request College Dlsdrot Agreement Budged Table 1201101 xlslDlsVids EDMSIDoo ClarouCleas?empletou.b BudgeV9udge11n1ame5on Table(003717900) Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52 Rehabilitation of the 141A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-60 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49 Total Project(s) Budget: $13,018,000 Consultant: Lee & Ro, Inc. Start Date of Project: 4/1/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Design of the rehabilitation I re cement of the following: 'A' Sheet Pum Station $237.790 $237,790 I00 Original PSA 14 3f22 "Street Pum Stabw $242.795 $242,795 Rocky Point Pump Station $344.679 $344,679 Bitter Point Pump Station $324.537 $324,537 Total $1,149,801 $1,149,801 C.\Cassidyl5-50 Rocky Pt PSl Rl 51 PSA Status Report(Property Purchase Request).doe 11/01/01 _ ReOsed 05114MB REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50 Dtivew-aY�'�55 �v- Zs o �p ly Y r� ■s -� l f y'. 'all;,/` O r� �� -��j 'a I S`• Project Location 1700 - 2000 WEST PACIFIC COAST HGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 Legend: NEWPORT BAY FIGURE 1 ROCKYREPLACEMENT OF THE POINT STATION CONTRACT • 1 ELECTRICAL PANEL r. '�a... . - 1 r t '�Y�Ya�tif Approximate of Rocky Point Coast1575 Pacific NEWPORT REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50 �`... .F '$ Vic, y �• cr'•.. ; ? i., M « 1 _ Project Location Current Location 1700 - 2000 WEST PACIFIC COAST HGHWAY Rocky Point Pump Station NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 1575 WEST PACIFIC COAST HGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 FIGURE 3 ' BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION MEMORANDUM Page 4 Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 Request for Additional Funds November 21,2001 8.0 District Standards The District Standards have continued to evolve between the time of proposal and the time of detailed design. The requirements for Electronic Database Management (EDMS)now include development of extensive documentation requirements that demand more time than was originally estimated,including: • SAT—SCADA Administration Tool • EID—Equipment and Instrumentation Database • CMMS—Computerized Maintenance Management System • CAD Standards- The OCSD CAD Manual was only recently issued. An additional 1856 hours of effort is anticipated to incorporate the new District Standards. Estimated Additional Fees $195,250 9.0 Odor Control and Air Emission Studies The original scope of work for the project did not include odor control modeling,tonic air emissions estimation,or estimation of offsite air emission impacts and health risks. An additional 521 hours of design effort will be necessary for this effort. Estimated Additional Fees $55,250 e BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION MEMORANDUM Page 5 Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 Request for Additional Funds November 21,2001 Summary The summary of additional items to the proposed Scope of Work is as follows: Task Total Additional No. Task Description Cost 1.0 New Trickling Filters $489,970 2.0 New Trickling Filter Pump Station $374,350 3.0 New Power Building No. 8/12kV Service Center $395,320 Interface/Emergency Generator 4.0 Primary Effluent Pipeline (Trickling Filters Pump $85,360 Station Influent) and Junction Box 5.0 Trickling Filter Effluent to PEPS $89,690 6.0 Secondary Clarifier Sludge/Scum Discharge To $18,120 Multiple Locations 7.0 Ventilation of Trickling Filters $61,060 8.0 District Standards $195,240 9.0 Odor Control and Air Emission Studies $55,250 Total Addendum Costs $1,764,270 The total compensation under this addendum will be: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services,(direct $ 1,313,733 $ 1,238,515 $2,552,248 labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 166%) Subconsultant Fees and $ 786,345 S 345,371 $1,131,716 Costs,Not to Exceed Profit(Q7.64%) $ 100,369 S 94,623 $ 194,992 Direct Costs,Not to Exceed $ 149,762 $ 85,761 $ 235,523 Total,Not to Exceed S 2,350,209 S 1,764,270 $4,114,479 PDC COMMITTEE MmUng Date TUBd.or Dir. 12/06/01 11/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbs Item Number _ PDC01-83 12 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE WESTSIDE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-52, REHABILITATION OF THE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-53, REHABILITATION OF THE CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-54, REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-28 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RW Beck, Inc.for design and construction support for Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52; Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-53; Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54; and Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of $186,105, increasing the total amount not to exceed $685,405. SUMMARY • In January 1999, MacDonald-Stephens Engineering (MSE), completed assessments of the Westside, Bay Bridge, and Edinger pump stations as part of Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37. • In September 2000, the Orange County Sanitation District (District)entered into a Professional Services Agreement(PSA)with MSE/RW Beck, Inc. (now RW Beck, Inc.)for design and construction support services for the rehabilitation of the Westside, Bay Bridge, Edinger, and Crystal Cove pump stations. The Scope of Work (SOW) includes an assessment of the Crystal Cove Pump Station. • In August 2001, the District completed its review of RW Beck, Inc.'s drafts of the Preliminary Design Report(FOR)for each station. The draft PDRs outlined additional work required beyond that outlined in the 1999 MSE assessment reports for the stations. • Proposed Addendum No. 2 with RW Beck, Inc. consists of the following: 1. Additional design to replace the existing pumps at the Westside, Bay Bridge, and Edinger pump stations. 2. Additional design to install a third pump at the Crystal Cove Pump Station. 3. Additional design to relocate the Crystal Cove Pump Station's south property block wall further south. 4. Additional design to upgrade instrumentation and controls to full automation at the Bay Bridge and Crystal Cove pump stations to conform to the District's latest design guidelines for the outlying pump stations. 5. Additional design to add dehumidification (air conditioning)for the electrical buildings at the Bay Bridge and Crystal Cove pump stations to conform to the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) latest design guidelines for the outlying (coastal) pump stations. 6. License (leasing)of PDS2D Software necessary for RW Beck, Inc. to conform to the District's latest requirements for Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This Addendum is for an amount not to exceed $186,105 and will amend the contract to an amount not to exceed $685,405. The attached Budget Information Tables reflect the changes to each projects funding. A total of$186,105 is being requested for authorization. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item:As noted below) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 2001-02 CIP Budget Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52, Section 8, Page 21. Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-53, Section 8, Page 30. Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54, Section 8, Page 31. Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28, Section 8, Page 36. Reallocation of Contingency Funds to the Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Budget will be required for each station totaling $186,105. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The original Scope of Work (SOW)outlined that the basis of the designs for the Westside, Bay Bridge and Edinger pump stations were to be the recommendations of the MacDonald- Stephens Engineers (MSE)assessment reports. The designs consisted principally of the following: Westside Pump Station: • Comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)codes for separation of area classifications. To achieve compliance, the District would separate the pump and electrical rooms by constructing separate entrances and installing seals where the pump shafts penetrate the barrier(electrical room floor)between the two rooms. The seals would also require new pump shafts and motors. • Install new ventilation systems to meet NFPA area classification requirements and, Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's)requirements for air changes per hour. G.w .•.•d.nftB Wnpnd.wdo Wl eo.mrmmd.aeoon%W%flm+xmmv a d. A. W: NMI Page 2 a i • Provide new controls and control panels including variable frequency drives (VFDs) consistent with District's standards. • Install a flow meter consistent with District's standards. • Install seismic (earthquake)supports and restraints to meet Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements. • Replace the station's roof. Bay Bridge Pump Station: • Comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes for separation of area classifications. To achieve compliance, the Orange County Sanitation District(District) would separate the pump and electrical rooms by constructing separate entrances and installing seals where the pump shafts penetrate the barrier between the two rooms. The seals would also require new pump shafts and motors. • Replace non-compliant or install missing electrical components (e.g. switches) to meet National Electrical Code (NEC)and Title 8, California Code Of Regulations, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)Safety Orders. • Replace ventilation systems to meet NFPA area classification requirements. • Install seismic (earthquake)supports and restraints to meet Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements. Edinger Pump Station: • Comply with the NFPA codes for separation of area classifications. To achieve compliance, the District would install an underground electrical vault to house new electrical and control equipment. The existing electrical equipment would be removed from the existing facility. • Provide new controls and control panels including variable frequency drives (VFDs) consistent with District's standards. • Install fourth pump for ultimate wet weather flow. • Install new ventilation systems to meet NFPA area classification requirements and OSHA's requirements for air changes per hour. • Install a flow meter consistent with District's standards. • Install seismic(earthquake)supports and restraints to meet UBC requirements. Crystal Cove Pump Station: The Crystal Cove Pump Station was not assessed as part of the Contract No. 2-37, thus an assessment was included in RW Beck, Inc.'s original Scope of Work(SOW). RW Beck, Inc. would assess the extent of deficiencies and recommend modifications. Redesign of known deficiencies, lack of adequate access (entrance)to and drainage of the site and separation of the area classifications, was included in the original SOW. Hydraulic Analysis: The original SOW also required RW Beck, Inc. to monitor dry and wet weather flows entering the stations. The District would use the data to refine each station's 1989 Master Plan and 1999 Strategic Plan projected ultimate wet weather flows. RW Beck, Inc. would then perform a hydraulic analysis of each station's pumps and wet well's ability to meet current and projected ultimate peak wet weather flows. The analyses resulted in recommendations to replace pumps as follows: c...ne••emaaoma+nomm•.o•�+�•+m.m K•i�now�+�+mn'sn nc0.xw ma.em �,,.�:WWI Page 3 v i Changes in the Scope of Work(SOW): 1. Westside Pump Station requires new pumps to meet current flows. Wet weather flows entering the station exceed the station's capacity and projected ultimate flows by at least 18% and 32% respectively. The station manages to pump the flows using its standby pump and/or surcharging the influent trunk, which is not recommended. Bay Bridge Pump Station requires new pumps to meet projected flows. Flows to enter the station are expected to exceed the capacity of the existing pumps between the years 2005 to 2008, reaching ultimate wet weather rates by 2010. Edinger Pump Station requires new pumps to eliminate loss of capacity due to `ragging". Rags can collect on the pump's impeller, greatly reducing or stopping flow through the pump. Personnel must be dispatched to the station to manually remove the rags. Edinger has had an unusual rate of"ragging", averaging as high as every other day. Operations installed and tested a pump, new to the Orange County Sanitation District(District) in an attempt to reduce or eliminate the ragging. The test pump has not ragged once in the approximate year its been installed. 2. Crystal Cove Pump Station requires a third pump to be installed to meet the latest projected flows. The station was designed for two-duty and one-standby pump. Only one-duty and one-standby pumps were installed when the station was constructed in 1995. The third pump is to serve as the second duty pump. Flows entering the station have increased significantly in the past year due to new home construction. At times, the flow has exceeded the rapacity of the one duty pump. Flows are expected to reach 90%of the ultimate flows by year 2005, reaching 100% by year 2010 The area's Master Coastal Development Permit has been amended since the station was designed. The amendments allow the Irvine Company to significantly increase the total number of homes to be built in the area. However, the excepted increase in the projected flows to the station is to be offset with some flows redirected to the Bay Bridge Pump Station. 3. Entrance to the Crystal Cove pump station is by an easement granted to the District by the Irvine Company. Surface changes to the easement are subject to the Irvine Company's approval. In their review of the District's realignment of the entrance, the Irvine Company indicated they would also grant additional five-foot strips of land adjacent to the easement and the District's property in fee. The additional property would provide additional access to the station's wet well, the principle goal of the project. The site's south wall, in need of repair,would have to be relocated to take advantage of the additional property. 4. When the original SOW was written, the District had not yet determined to upgrade instrumentation and controls beyond those stations (Westside& Edinger)requiring new electrical to meet separation of area classifications. Additional funding is required for Bay Bridge and Crystal Cove pump station control system and electrical designs. G MENVpagaBmro ApaW R¢pls1LM1 BevO A3nN FecwlSlIDlUMn 1311rJM'Bx#Crc x.xa: eaumi Page 4 - 5. When the original Scope of Work(SOW)was written, the Orange County Sanitation District(District) had not yet determined that Consultant Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)would be done using the PDS2D software. Thus, additional funding is required for RW Beck, Inc. to lease a license to use the new software for our project. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS The Westside, Bay Bridge and Crystal Cove pump stations do not require additional CEQA work. However, the Edinger Pump Station will require a Negative Declaration to be published, approved by the Board and filed with the County Clerk. The CEQA process has been initiated. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 3-52) 2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-53) 3. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 5-54) 4. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 11-28) 5. PSA Status Report 6. Figure 1, Location Map WDCJoJak G Ly.MabBanOa\B�vU MetNe R¢p�ttl1M1 BaVN ApenGa Fam1s\t I01VIem t31�.fiv Beb.N[ Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE WESTSIDE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 3-52 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Studyes/Pennitfing $ 6,000 S 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 100% Consultant PSA is 181,500 $ 149.000 $ 38,000 $ 187,000 $ 146,895 $ 37,706 $ 1B6,601 $ 31,000 17% Design Staff $ 77,000 $ 67,000 $ 67,000 S 67,000 $ 67,000 $ 30,000 45% Constmcion Contract S 884.000 $ 884,000 $ 884.000 $ Construction Administration $ 112,300 $ 146,000 $ 146,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 75,100 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 $ Contingency $ 283.100 $ 270.000 $ (38.000) $ 232.000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 1,619,000 1 $ 1,619,000 $ - $ 1,619,000 1 $ 221,895 $ 37,706 1 $ 259,601 $ 67,000 1 26% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 1.619,000 1 $ 1,619,000 1 $ - $ 1.619,000 1 S 221.895 1 $ 37,706 1 $ 259.601 1 $ 67,000 26% Project Development Completed under Contract No 2-37,Miscellaneous Improvements and RenaeiliUuon to outlying Pump stations C 1Cassidyi3 52 Alest ude Meier FlmaCNange Onteryl1.28 Addendum 2 Budget Table tlslDistricts EDMS/Doc CIawClau?emplateUob BudgeVBudget Information Table I0037179091 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-53 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED¢ PRQPOSEp FUND THIS - PRQP.OSE9- ESTII(IgTEp ES11I�T Fh0' PROJECThA8K AUTHORIZED PROJECT *BUDOETPtg REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION -TOTAL EIEPfiN�IT�1RE EXPEEf 11Ep„ BUDGET BUDGET INCREASfi� BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 81000 1 $ 8,000 $ 8.000 is 8.000 100% Consultant PSA $ 136.600 $ 112.000 $ 69.000 $ 181,000 $ 111,975 $ 68,774 $ 180.749 $ 26,000 14% Design Staff $ 50.100 $ 80,000 $ 80.000 $ 80.000 $ 80.000 $ 8.000 10% Construction Contract $ 577,500 $ 628,000 $ 628.000 $ Construction Administration $ 80.100 $ 106.000 $ 106,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 45,400 $ 60,000 $ 60.000 $ Contingency $ 196,300 $ 200.000 $ (69,000) $ 131,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 1.094,000 $ 1,194,000 $ - $ 1.194,000 $ 199.975 $ 68,774 $ 268,749 $ 42,000 16% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 1.094.000 1 $ 1,194,000 $ - $ 1.194,000 $ 199,975 $ 68.774 $ 268,749 $ 42.000 16% Pmjod Developmentwmplete under Contra No.2-37,Mlseellanwus Improvem ris and Reb Wiftallon to Ou9ying Pump Staliws CeCessldy�-52 Westside PS1CaanBe Ordadf5.53 NmarvJnbnt 2 Budget Table 12060tx1slDisV S EDMSIDoc CIasLClaasRemplalslJab Budge108udgel InlmmeWn Table(003717909) BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-54 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 38,500 $ 85,000 $ 37,000 $ 122.000 $ 64,301 1 $ 36,098 $ 120.399 $ 31,000 26% Design Staff $ 13,500 $ 86,000 $ 86,000 $ 86,000 $ 86,000 $ 13,0D0 15% Construction Contract $ 152,300 $ 182,000 $ 182,000 $ Construction Administration $ 18,500 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 22,600 $ 44,000 $ 44,000 $ Contingency $ 54,600 $ 87,000 $ (37,OD0 $ 50,000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 306.000 $ 526,000 $ - $ 526.000 1 $ 176,301 $ 36,098 1 $ 212,399 $ 50,000 24% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 306,000 $ 526.000 $ - $ 526,000 11 $ 176.301 1 $ 36,098 1 $ 212,399 1 $ 50,000 1 24% Pmlect Development wmpleted under Conbad No,2-37,Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to culling Pump Stations C,%Cassidyl3-52 Westside PS\Change Orde,15-54 Amendment 2 Budget Tablet 20601 raDutilcts EDMSIDw Cli aticlasslremplateJJob Budget Sudgel Information Table(003717999) BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 11-28 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $ 6.000 $ 6,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 174,000 $ 155.000 $ 44,000 $ 199,000 $ 154,129 $ 43,527 $ 197,656 $ 30,000 15% Design Staff $ 61,000 $ 65,000 $ 65.000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 15,000 23% Construction Contract $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800.000 $ Construction Administration $ 97.000 $ 135.000 $ 135,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 59.000 $ 62,000 $ 82,000 $ Contingency $ 252,000 $ 240.000 1 $ 44.000 $ 196,0 0 — $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,449,000 $ 1.483.000 $ - $ 1,483,000 $ 225.129 $ 43,627 $ 268,656 $ 51,000 19% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 1,449,000 1 $ 1,483,000 $ - $ 1.483.000 1 1 $ 225,129 1 $ 43,527 1 $ 268.656 1 $ 51,000 1 19% P.jW Davalop umt..stated muter Conbacl No.2.37.Miscellaneous Impr ementa and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations C Tau1dyQ-52 Wastalde Matar Flaw\Change Ordeal 1-28 Addendum 2 Budget Table .1olastrice ElDl Classaclaes?emplalelJob audgegBudgel lnrormation Table(00V 17909) Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52 Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-53 Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-64 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28 Total Project Budget: $4,482,000 Consultant: RW Beck, Inc. Start Date of Project: 8/1/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Original Provide engineering services for design and 7/19/00 PSA construction support for Contract Nos. 3-52, 5-53, $499,300 $499,300 5-45 and 11-28 4/25101 1 Company name change, 0 $499,300 MSE/RW Beck to RW Beck Additional design services, principally for the Pending 2 replacement of pumps at the Westside, Bay Bridge $186,105 $685,405 and Edinger pump stations and the addition of a pump to the Crystal Cove pump station. CACassidy1352 Westude PMCeenge Orderl3-52 Amendment 2 PSA Status Repoli 120601.doc 10/30/01 Revised 05114MB LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA H AAA a BRA nd — wen x.. B EA iaa�uoA avo VlESTSIDE P.S F RTON YORBA PLACENM LINDA e 00 BU 9 � ..-/ yPALA LM BP K ANAH IM py RE VILLA y PARK v MIT : ST O + r •w c RAN E eeunun• a DEN GROVE S ISTR 4 L a i CH y w rt I TA W ANA FOUNtA VALLEN TON g �7 EDING'ER P.3 PACIFlC OCEAN "� MESAA IRVINE BAY BRIDGE P.S. NEW 0&1`1-1 .,.1 BEACH CRYSTAL -� CRYSTAL COVE P.S. LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 5MILES FIGURE 1 ,v Y PDC COMMITTEE M"Ung Date To 80.of ". 12/06/01 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDODI-84 12(o) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Robyn A.Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-67 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-67, providing for additional engineering services for final design and construction support phases for an additional amount of$735,509, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,132,937. SUMMARY • The original objective of the Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, was primarily to assist the Orange County Sanitation District (District)in the commitment to successfully manage its peak flows; and thereby lessen or alleviate the potential emergency use of the 78-inch standby ocean outfall. • The Peak Flow Management project studied the use of existing facilities during peak flow emergencies and made recommendations for proposed improvements that will help the District cost-effectively manage peak flows. • Authorization was made at the November Planning, Design and Construction Committee (PDC)allowing negotiation with Water 3 Engineering (W3E)for completion of this project. • The final design phase of this project shall include several work items including: 1. Final Design: Construction of Santa Ana River weir improvements; modifications to Effluent Junction Box (EJB) at the South end of Plant No. 1; conversion of Primary Clarifiers A, B&C to equalization structures; and automation of selected inlet gates at the Primary and Secondary Clarifiers at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed fee for the final design of these facilities is $603,499. The proposed construction support services fee is $76,735. 2. Modification of Current Storm Water Management Practice: Preparation of the Master Plan for Existing Storm Water Collection Facilities and Proposed Improvements. The proposed fee for development of the Stormwater Master Plan is $55,275. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$735,509 is being requested under the"Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA)task heading. Page 1 r� BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY2001-02. Section 8, Page 88, Capital Improvement Program,Ocean Outfall Systems, Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No change to the overall budget is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Rainstorms in past winters have produced wastewater flows exceeding the rated capacity of the 120-inch ocean ouffall. The recommended improvements to be designed in the second phase of this project will reduce the potential for discharging flows through the emergency (78-inch) ocean ouffall and/or to the Santa Ana River(BAR). It is estimated that the conversion of the emergency overflow basins A, B &C at Plant No. 2 to storage basins, will provide an additional 1.2 million gallons (MG) of emergency storage during a peak flow event. The basins will be provided with pumping equipment that will allow the tanks to be emptied in a six to eight hour time frame. The diverted flow could then be rerouted for further processing or emptied to the outfall after peaks have subsided. The automation of selected inlet gates at the Primary and Secondary Clarifiers at both Plant Nos. 1 &2 will allow staff to utilize the existing standby tank volume in these facilities for additional storage in events of peak flow. It is estimated that Plant No. 1 can provide between 3 and 10 MG additional storage,depending on planned construction projects and projected flows. Plant No. 2 can provide an additional 3.5 MG of storage in its Primary Clarifiers facilities. Installation of these automated valves should allow Staff to utilize this additional storage capacity. The third element of this project will provide the Orange County Sanitation District (District)with a much-needed Master Plan of the existing Storm Water Collection facilities and piping layouts. At this time, the District treats all of the storm water that it collects at both plants. There is currently no accurate accounting of the collection-piping network. It is difficult to assess the current status and recommended improvement to this system without this mapping. This task of the project will supply District staff with this essential tool. It is believed that with better management and rerouting of storm water flows at both plants, that the District could reduce peak flows by approximately 20 mgd. Water 3 Engineering (W3E)was selected to perform the original Scope of Work and produced a Summary Report that was completed in May 2001. A draft hydraulic model was prepared by Carollo Engineers (acting a subconsultant to INK), and was presented to the District in September 2001. Finalization of this model, and Staff training is scheduled for early 2002. The Summary Report provided the District with recommendations to assist in successful management of peak flows. However,with relative uncertainties imposed by the impending NPDES waiver application, the District recognized the benefit of postponing construction of some of the recommended improvements. Specifically, the District decided to delay immediate construction of a large earthen flow equalization basin at Plant No. 2 until the issue of full Page 2 •y secondary treatment is finalized. However, the study identified several other ideas that should be moved forward to final design and implementation. Staff recommends continuing design of this project with Water 3 Engineering (W3E)as they have successfully finalized the Preliminary Study phase of this project. With W3E's understanding of the details and assumptions of this project,extension of their contract to include final design would be preferable to issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP)for Consultant selection. The District would have to pay a 'new" Consultant to familiarize themselves with the details of this job that W3E already possesses,which would increase the overall cost to this project. ALTERNATIVES No Alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS The Peak Flow Management Project was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report(EIR). A supplemental EIR has been initiated to update the Program EIR to reflect the proposed upgrades. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Addendum No. 1 Proposal RW:jo:jak:nc GAW.dlalagendaXBoard Agenda Repodsl2001 Board Agenda RepodsN201Nlenn 12(g).Walerldm Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Peak Flow Management Job No. J-67 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPQSED ROSED FU,RDS - THIS PFFOPOSED ESTIM1U(T .E$TI$1A'[E4;. PROU�OYf� §j ,' AUTHORMW PRO:IECT� 8(I'Dfj�T,, ED -AUTHORI2E6- =AUTHOR-fZATIOfL T0' AL 6061i1,T�' 3Cpa r BUDGET BUUOET INOREABE LIbbET TO DATE ' REOUE3T AUTHORIZATION Td TO DA�j` Pro'ect Development $ 17,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 9,147 46% Studies/Permitting $ 296,000 $ 296,000 $ $ - $ 0% Consultant PSA $ 227,200 It 986,000 $ 986,000 $ 283,280 $ 735,509 $ 1,018,789 $ 0% Design Staff $ 144.500 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 144,500 $ 144,500 $ 25,691 18% Construction Contract $ 1,761,000 $ 8,525,000 $ 8,525,000 $ - $ 111 0% Construction Administration $ 325,150 $ 367,000 $ 367,000 $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 325,150 $ 405.000 $ 405.000 1 $ 0% Contingency $ 840,000 $ 1,700000 $ 1,700,000 1 $ - 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 3,640,000 $ 12,381,000 $ - $ 12,381,000 ,. $ 447,780 $ 735,509 $ 1,183,289 $ 34,949 3% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 3,640,000 1 $ 12.381.000 1$ - $ 12,381,000 1 1 $ 447,780 $ 735,509 $ 1.183,289 1 $ 34,949 1 3% GIRIeNetWIP4887-Budget Table-MUNIASID6bicK Professional Services Agreement Status Report Peak Flow Management Job No. J-67 Total Project Budget: $ 1,132.937 Consultant: Water 3 Engineering Start Date of Project: May 25, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 4/26/01 Original PSA Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67 $283,280 $283,280 Pending Addendum Provide Additional Preliminary and Final $735,509 $1,018,789 No. 1 Design Work CAFIIeNe1W IP -67 PSA Status Re d Add.#t.doc 11/27/01 R"sed 05/14/98 EXHIBIT A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT JOB NO.J-67 SCOPE OF SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 1 WATER 3 ENGINEERING Revised November 26,2001 INTRODUCTION This Amendment No. 1 to the Peak Flow Management Project, Job No. 1-67 is for implementation of the findings and recommendations presented in the Project Summary Report. Seven Design Memoranda (DM) and a Project Summary Report were prepared as part of the original project scope of services. The engineering services proposed under this amendment are based on satisfying the requirements of the OCSD Engineering Standards dated May 14, 2001. The Scope of Services for this amendment is based on the recommendations contained in the J- 67 Project Summary Report and includes the following: • Final Design Package I - Construction Documents for the work identified in DM 1 — SAR Emergency Overflow and Plant I Junction Box Flow Control Upgrade, and DM 2—Modifications to Emergency Overflow Basins A, B and C at Plant 2. • Stormwater Master Plan and Pre-Design as identified in DM 7 —Masterplanning for modification of current stormwater management practice. • Final Design Package 2 for the modifications identified in DM 4 — Automation of selected inlet gates at the primary and secondary clarifiers at both Plant 1 and Plant 2 to facilitate use of standby basin storage volume during peak flow events. A preliminary sheet list based on our understanding of the project requirements is provided in the attached Table 1 for the two final design packages. Coordination with OCSD staff to determine power availability and PLC spare capacity availability is required during final design and may result in a need to modify the assumed level of effort. Two workshops with District Instrumentation & Control (I&C) staff are included for this purpose. Regular project team meetings are also included. A detailed breakdown of the estimated level of effort is provided in the attached Tables 2 and 3. A proposed schedule for completion of the tasks described in this Amendment No. 1 is attached as Figure 1. A more detailed description of the effort assumed for each item is included in the following sections. Served/200I Aug Scope Amend No. I-RevI Page l of 11/26/01 TASK 1 —Santa Ana River Emergency Overflow and Plant I Effluent Junction Box Flow Control Upgrade Water 3 Engineering(W3E)will provide final design services for installation of adjustable weirs at the Santa Ana River (SAR) Emergency Overflow at the OOBS Terminus Structure, and to modify the control of the seven flow valves at the Plant 1 Effluent Junction Box. Task A—OOBS Terminus Structure The existing fixed weirs will be replaced with three (3) adjustable weir gates at the GOBS Terminous Structure per the recommendations contained in DM 1. Plans and technical specification sections for structural modifications and anchorage required for installing the new gates to the existing Terminus Structure wall will be prepared. It is assumed that structural modifications will be limited to providing an opening for gate installation and thickening the wall sections to accommodate anchors. It is assumed that no other structural modifications will be required. Seismic analysis and design of an upgrade of the existing structure is not included. The electrical and control system design will be based on the preliminary P & IDs and Control Description provided in the Peak Flow Management Project Summary Report. It is assumed that power will be available from GOBS. It is also assumed that the PLC at GOBS will have adequate spare control system capacity to accommodate the added controls. GOBS wetwell level output data from the existing GOBS level monitoring system will be used for control of the new gates. District equipment and standard templates will be used, with review and approval of the work provided by District Process Control Integration (PCI) staff. This work includes the minimum PLC programming necessary to interface equipment defined by the project with existing systems in order to minimize expense to the District. It is noted that all equipment installed under this project is used on an occasional basis. Gate position changes are anticipated only in the event of extreme high flow conditions at the plants and as necessary to maintain equipment. Task B—Effluent Junction Box The Flow Control Upgrade includes modifications to all seven control valves at the Plant 1 Effluent Junction Box (EJB). Each valve shaft will be extended to a removable pedestal at the deck level of the EJB. The electrical and control system design will be based on the preliminary P & IN and Control Description provided in the Peak Flow Management Project Summary Report. It is assumed that power will be available at the 12 kv distribution center and the blower building PLC at the secondary process will have adequate spare control capacity to accommodate the added controls. An analysis will be provided to verify that the existing top deck is capable of supporting the new removable pedestals and valve controls and control valves. It is assumed that no modifications to the structure will be required to support the new pedestals and valve controls. Server//200]Aug Scope Amend No. I•Revl Page 2 of 9 11/26/01 • The Contract Documents will include electrical design documentation to extend the existing power feed to the relocated valve operators. District equipment and standard templates will be used, with review and approval of the work provided by District PCI staff. This work includes the minimum PLC programming necessary to interface equipment defined by the project with existing systems in order to minimize expense to the District. It is noted that all equipment installed under this project is used on an occasional basis. Enhancements and/or upgrades to the security systems at the EJB are not included. TASK 2—Modifications to Emergency Overflow Basins A,B and C W3E will provide final design services for Task 2, based on recommendations provided in Design Memorandum No. 2. Final design is to include modifications to the control of the inlet gate and installation of one propeller type drain pump in Emergency Overflow Basins A-C. It is assumed that the existing sludge withdrawal pumps or a portable submersible pump owned by the District will be used to remove stored flow below the minimum submergence cutoff of the propeller pump. The existing primary sedimentation basin mechanisms will be removed from inside all three clarifiers. All other equipment will remain, but will not be modified or upgraded. Structural details to provide openings between tanks to hydraulically connect the basins for the purpose of filling and draining will be included. The structural design will consist of developing details for adding four 12-inch openings at two locations in the walls between tanks, for a total of eight openings. Structural mounting of the propeller type drain pump will be provided. A visual structural evaluation of the basins and structural condition summary report will be included during construction. It is assumed that no other structural modifications will be required. Seismic analysis and upgrade design of the existing structure is not included. The electrical and control system design will be based on the preliminary P & IDs and Control Description provided in the Peak Flow Management Project Summary Report. It is assumed that power will be available at Primary Power Building A and the PLC at OOBS will have adequate spare control system capacity to accommodate the added controls. Designn For Tasks 1 and 2 Electrical and Instrumentation design submittals at 30 (DS 1), 60 (DS 2), 90 (DS 3) and 100 percent(FD)completion points will be provided. The 60 percent and final design submittals will be total project submittals. Each project submittal will include an updated cost estimate. The plans and specifications, and PLC programming will be prepared to the District's standards for public bid for design package 1, including a quantified list of bid items. It is assumed that the District will prepare the "Front End" specifications (Special Provisions, General Provisions, Proposal, Bond Forms, etc.). Twenty working days are included in the project schedule for the District's review of each design submittal. The design budget also is based on using the District's Standards dated September 11, 2001. Additional time will be required if changes are made to the District's Standards. For each submittal, W3E will respond to written District staff comments on a response log. District Server//2001Aug Scope Amend No. I-Revl Page 3 of 9 - I IR6/01 comments will be incorporated into the project, as appropriate, and submitted with the next project submittal. The following items are assumed for the Final Design Package 1. _ General 1. Equipment data sheets and technical definitions for equipment. 2. Equipment and Instrument Database (Ell)) (electronic file) as submitted with the Project Summary Report. This information includes data for electrical equipment and instruments associated with the new equipment such as MCC's and PLC's, and demolished equipment. The W3E team will provide updated electronic copies at DSI and FDS. Electrical 1. Single line diagrams to the MCC level as defined in the District Design Guidelines Manual. 2. Load list with motor horsepower. This list will show all electrical loads for each voltage level. The equipment list will include a listing of all equipment and design information including motor horsepower and status(i.e.connected,running, standby). 3. Review of load criticality of equipment. Criticality of equipment may impact which power source is used for the new equipment. 4. ETAP Database revised to remove the equipment designated for demolition. 5. Field Findings Report. 6. Demolition electrical plans and elevations. Instrumentation and Controls 1. Tag Numbering System - As developed from the block of numbers provided by the District. The W3E team will develop Proposed Area Numbers as needed, for District review and approval. 2. SAT Database(Demolition of equipment at Plant 2 PSB A,B, C) 3. P&ID's of the revised system (Assumes field verification of existing P&ID's will not be required). ProEramminE 1. The W3E team will initiate PLC programming following acceptance of engineering (90% Submittal)by the District. We will modify and program existing PLC programs only to the extent required to interface new equipment with the existing system. For Design Element IA, this will include interface with the existing OOBS PLC and modifications to its program to incorporate automatic control of the Terminus Structure's four gate operators using the OOBS wet well level output data from the existing OOBS level monitoring system to control the new gates. Programming for Design Element 1B will include modifying the existing PLC to incorporate automatic control of the Effluent Junction Box's seven gate operators for remote monitoring and control. Programming will include modifications to existing OOBS PLC program to incorporate automatic control of the EOB inlet gate at Junction Box 7 based upon OOBS wet well level for Design Element 2. Server//2001Aug Scope Amend No. 1-Revl Page 4 of 9 1126/O1 • TASK 3—Motorized Gates for Available Standby Storage Volume Modifications to inlet gates on selected primary and secondary clarifiers at Plants 1 and 2 will be provided under [his task, based on the recommendations provided in Design Memorandum No. 4. DM 4 identified 19 gates for addition of motor operator and remote manual control capability from the plant control system. The existing gates at Plant 1 are located at Primary Clarifiers 1-5 Distribution Box (4 gates) and at Secondary clarifiers 1-14(6 gates). The existing gates at Plant 2 are located at Distribution Structure B (5 gates)and at Secondary Clarifiers A-L(4 gates). Design for Task 3 Plans and specifications will be prepared to the District's standards for Final Design Package 2, with the intention of negotiating a change order to the existing contract with the Contractor selected for the P1-37 construction. The initial effort for Final Design Package 2 will be to prepare a preliminary design report that will identify the specific gates to be motorized. The specific gates will be determined based on optimizing the proposed power source location and the PLC to be used for connection into plant control system,along with input from the operations staff. Draft P & IN and control descriptions will be provided for the identified gates. Electrical system requirements for the new motorized gate operators will be provided. The District will provide direction on the sources of power for the new motorized gate operators. Only"Remote- Manual" and "Local-Manual" control will be provided for the gates. W3E will obtain direction from the District on the PLC interface locations for the new motorized gate operators. It is assumed that the gate control capability will be added through existing PLCs with spare capacity. Reprogramming of the entire PLC is not included in this proposal. The following items will be included in the final design for Task 3: General 1. Equipment data sheets and technical definitions for equipment will be completed. 2. Equipment and Instrument Database (EID) (electronic file) - hlput data for mechanical equipment, electrical equipment and instruments associated with the new equipment and demolished equipment into the EID database. District's to provide EID database for Consultant to begin populating. For budgeting purposes, we have estimated 19 items of equipment and 801/0. The EID table submitted with the PDR will include major electrical and instrumentation equipment, such as new MCC's and PLC's. W3E will provide electronic copies at DSI, DS2 and FDS. Data from EID will be transferred to CMMS by the District. Electrical 1. Single line diagrams to the MCC level as defined in the District Design Guidelines Manual. 2. Load list with motor horsepower. This list will show all electrical loads for each voltage level. The equipment list will include a listing of all equipment and design information including motor horsepower and status(i.e. connected, running,standby). Server/12001Aug Scope Amend No. 1-Revl Page 5 of 9 11/2&01 3. Review of load criticality of equipment. Criticality of equipment will impact which power source is used for the new equipment. 4. ETAP Database. The W3E team will modify a copy of the ETAP database to remove the equipment designated for demolition. 5. Field Findings Report-Report on As-Built conditions. 6. Demolition electrical plans and elevations. Instrumentation and Controls 1. Tag Numbering System - Basis for equipment tag numbers as developed from block of numbers provided by the District. The W3E team will develop Proposed Area Numbers as needed, for District review and approval. 2. Interim control systems for new or existing equipment are not anticipated and have not been included in the budget. 3. P&ID's of the revised system (Assume field verification of existing P&ID's will not be required.) Proerammine 1. The W3E team will initiate PLC program development and programming following acceptance of engineering (DS2 90% Submittal) by the District. W3E will modify and program existing PLC programs only to the extent required to interface new automation requirements with the existing system. TASK 4—Bid Support Services/Contract Negotiation This task involves assisting the District during bid of the facilities included in Final Design Package 1 (Tasks 1 and 2). Assistance during the bid period will include responding to questions during the bid advertisement period, and preparation of necessary addenda to the plans and specifications to clarify or modify the contract documents. For budgetary purposes,only one addendum is assumed. It is also assumed that the District will be responsible for all reproduction and distribution of bid documents and addenda. It is assumed that the District will negotiate with the Contractor selected for the P1-37 construction to implement Final Design Package 2. This task also includes assistance with negotiations primarily related to the opinion of probable construction cost and responding to questions from the Contractor. TASK 5—Construction Support Services This task involves assisting the District during construction of the facilities included in Final Design Package I and Final Design Package 2 (Tasks 1, 2 and 3). Construction support services includes shop drawing review, review of other submittals, assistance with Requests for Information(RFIs), attendance at construction meetings, assistance with change orders and start- Server//2001Aug Scope Amend No. 1-Revl Page 6 of 9 11/26/01 • up. The level of effort related to construction support is limited to the hours indicated on the attached Table 2. TASK 6—Record Drawings Record drawings will be provided per the requirements of the District Standards and based on mark ups provided by the Contractor for both bid packages. TASK 7 —Stormwater Masterplan and Pre-Design of Stormwater Management System Modifications This task includes masterplanning and pre-design of modifications needed to the on-site stormwater systems at Plant 1 and Plant 2 to allow discharge to the Santa Ana River of stormwater collected on-site. The following items are included: • Assist District in meetings with the Regional Board.(24 bra) • Additional research on the existing Plant 1 and Plant 2 stormwater and waste side stream piping systems. Research to include review of plant piping maps updated since the Design Memo 7 work. Plant project reference sheet lists approximately 400 projects for Plant 1 and 500 projects for Plant 2. Research will include review of selected drawings from some of these projects. OCSD is assumed to provide access to design drawings and plant mapping. (120 hours) • Meet with District Staff to review results and identify areas where drawing documentation appear incomplete. (8 hours) • Development of field investigation plan to acquire additional piping information that is not available on existing District documentation.(40 hours) • Review of survey information identifying the sizes and invert elevations of relevant piping throughout both plants. (24 hours) • Coordination of cross-connection testing of existing piping to verify the current discharge location of various tanks drains, waste lines, etc. For budgetary purposes, it is assumed that W3E will work with OCSD staff as necessary to assist with this cross-connection testing if necessary. (100 hours) • Routing for pipelines larger than 24-inches will be evaluated for space requirements. (40 hours) • Pre-design is to include identification of and conceptual development of a flow control system for directing stormwater flows away from the waste side stream pump system following the"First Flush"to the SAR. (40 hours) • Following verification of the existing drainage system, an updated opinion of probable capital costs from that provided in DM 4 will be provided to determine the extent of the modifications necessary prior to initiation of final design. (16 hours) • One workshop focused on Stormwater Management issues. (12 hours) It is assumed that the District will coordinate with the Regional Board (RWQCB) regarding the proposed discharge to the SAR and modifications to the current stormwater management practice. Evaluation of treatment options (if required by the RWQCB) for discharge to the SAR is not included. Server//2001Aug Scope Amend No. 1-Rev1 Page 7 of 9 - 11/26101 TASK 8—Meetings and Project Management This task involves attendance at meetings, workshops and for routine project management. For budgetary purposes a total of 8 monthly progress meetings with the Districts staff and two workshops with staff during the design have been included. For design fee budget purposes, it is assumed W3E will use of Microsoft Project to produce a Gantt chart for the project schedule(see attached). Clarifications& Assumptions Reeardina PLC-SCADA Programmine • SPEC Services differentiates control systems engineering and design from PLC programming and SCADA screen modifications which are implementation tasks.As such we expect them to follow acceptance of project control schemes by the District. • Control system(s) descriptions, P&ID's, data network diagrams, databases, 1/0 signal identification, communications schematics, loop diagrams, loop tag numbers, etc, will be developed during the engineering phases of detailed design. As design nears completion and the District approves the control system, development of the PLC architecture and logic diagrams may be initiated. This may take place as early as DS2 (90%) but is expected to overlap the FDS (100%) and involve mainly the PCI group. • With approval of PLC architecture and logic diagrams by the District,PLC programming and SCADA screen development can be done. SPEC Services proposes to use District equipment and standard templates with "over the shoulder' review and approval of the work by District PCI staff to modify and program existing PLC programs only to the extent required to interface new automation requirements with the existing system. Program modifications will not be loaded until all physical equipment interfaces have been installed and tested by the Contractor. • ETAP Electrical System Analysis- SPEC Services does not anticipate that Design Package I will justify the time and expense of performing an ETAP electrical system analysis for each installation. Data from project J-25-4 should be sufficient to assess the impacts of additional electrical loads. Any additional MCC sections and associated databases can be modified to reflect them. Briefly this package will: - Relocate seven existing MOV's at Plant 1 at the Effluent Junction Box. Electrical loads will remain the same. - Add four MOV's at Plant 2 to be fed from OOBS. Electrical loads are expected to increase by 10 to 20 HP per motor which would operate simultaneously under extraordinary conditions. Add one motor operator to an existing gate and a pump drain motor at Plant 2 to be fed from Power Building A and remove loads associated with the existing sludge Server//2001Aug Scope Amend No. I-Revl Page 8 of 9 - 11/26/01 • collector and scum removal equipment. Electrical loads are expected to increase by 10 HP of intermittent operation for the valve operator and 10 HP of occasional operation for the pump. • Changes in District Standards - Budget and schedule depend on systematic execution of the scope of work as developed in the approved J-67 Project Summary Report that forms the basis of design. Deviations that occur subsequent to the start of detailed design requiring revisions may require adjustments to the budget and schedule. Server/2001Aug Scope Amend No. 1-Revl Page 9 of 9 -11/26/01 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT JOB NO. J-67 TABLE 2 Water 3 Engineering Estimated Level of Effort for Amendment No. 1 Item PrindpaV Project Staff Designer Clerical Labor Hours Labor Cost Task Pro.Mammer Engineer Engineer W3E WX Design Packages Final Design 1 BAR Emerg.Ovr8w8 EJB Upgrades(DP•IA) 24 80 100 too 42 406 $ 34,302 2 Mods to EO Basins A,8 and C (DP•18) 24 64 80 iM 30 338 $ 28.780 3 Automation of Standby Basin Gates(DP 2) 24 140 120 220 70 574 $ 48.300 Coordination wim Subconsultanis 40 160 - 40 240 $ 25165 4 Bid Support/Contract Negotiation Services $ 136.547 Design Package 1 20 30 30 40 12 132 $ 12,124 Design Package 2 16 24 24 24 8 96 $ 9056 5 Construction Support Services $ 21,180 Design Package 1 24 80 80 16 40 240 $ 22,259 Design Package 2 16 60 83 8 40 207 It 18,637 6 Record Drawings $ 40.896 Design Package 1 (54 sheets) 6 20 20 100 20 166 $ 12,835 Design Package 2(51 sheets) 4 16 16 8o 16 132 S 10,158 $ 22.993 7 Master Plan for Stormwater Mngmnt Mods 40 160 120 8o 24 424 $ 40.616 8 Meetings and Project Management Project Meetings(B) 48 64 16 - 16 144 $ 15,879 Design Workshops(2) 24 24 18 8 8 80 $ 8.322 Project Management(24 men") 24 48 - 24 96 $ 9,775 $ 33,977 TOTAL 334 970 705 876 390 3,275 $ 296,209 WATER 3 ENGINEERING Burdened Labor Rates ($/hr) $ 72 $ 58 $ 46 $ 37 $ 25 Burdened Labor Coat $ 24,048 $ 56,260 $ 32,430 $ 32,412 $ 9,750 $ 1Sit Overhead at 74% 114,626 Profit at 9.9% $ 26 683 Subtotal W3E Consulting Services 296,209 SUBCONSULTANTS Structural Allowance $ 50,000 Spec Services-ElecVlnstlProgramming(I $ 379,300 Deed Costs 10,000 TOTAL,not ip esceed $ 735 509 1 I Refer to Table 3 for detailed breakdown of Spec Services hours Pk Flow Proposal-Revlalon Sum I ln7/01 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date 9or.B10 AGENDA REPORT Ron ,en13 13 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2001. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO),serves as the Districts professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the'Liquid Operating Monies"and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies"portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust The District's portfolios are priced to market('mark-to-market")as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts November 30,2001 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 12,890,470 3.5 Union Bank Checking Account 511,361 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 821,000 1.9 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 42,749,466 5.0 PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 350,802,858 4.3 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,818 (1) Debt Service Reserves w/rrustees 35,171,695 4.5 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL $442 953 866 (1)Unavailable as o1 the data of this report. ALTERNATIVES None. CECIA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC \VeaOWau llrq dta.11.16o1d AI.M.Repmlf lBead nMii.ftP .120111b11JTrwaunMPl Eac R..P.d. W001 Page 2 uunuu i '?i'i'i'� iiiii i*iii+i� Nwm *.;.OR a . ° MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2001) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $43,281,977 • Mellon $43,312,205 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $43,414,997 • Mellon $43,452,049 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.21 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ain/loss)of 1%Change: $90,892 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 64% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.21 0.21 3 Months: 1.01 0.76 12 Months: 5.41 4.46 Year-to-Date: 4.74 3.91 Commentary Interast rate,u the ahon-end ofthe yield curve demeamd during the month(3-month T-Bills down 29 bash points to 1.72%),while longer maturities rose(30-year Tmesuries up 41 bash point to 5.29%). The Liquid ponfoldo achieved a mum equal to the benclu uk fer the month,ud outperformed the benchmark by 93 bads points year-todate. PIMCWs emphash on higher yielding securities such as wmmercid paper and shun-term notes enhanced retumc. c:�o.�W um.uxn�.r a4•nuaaam.orrtrra. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTAMNAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2001) Long-Term Operating Mantes(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $355,436,809 • Mellon $355,230,303 Historical Cost: PIMCO $344,870,477 • Mellon $344,809,881 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.09 Of Index: 2.37 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,428,629 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repast: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 26% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avera a PonColio Credit aality: "AA+'• 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0n/o 15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes' 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Raze of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: -0.66 -0.60 1 Month: 1 3 Months: .57 2.38 12 Months: 9.05 10.80 Year-to-Date: 7.60 9.21 • Three-month yields decreased fw the month(90-day T-Bills down 29 basis pones to 1.736/6)while longer meNfiies mu(5-year Treasury Notes up 59 basis points to 4.06%). • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 6 bans point forth,month,and legged the benchmark by 161 basis points yew-to-0ate. • PIMCO's durtlion,slightly below index,was positive for performance as yields now across most maturities. • A bmada4m 4ndex maturity mix was neutral for Perforrmance. • Although short-maturity holdings were positive as short-term yields fell,these gains were largely offset by losses at the lower end of the curve where yields rose. • As Treasuries legged the broader market,an underweight allocation was poshin. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities detracted Dom performance as heightened volatility led to prim pressure in this sector. • M underweight Almaden to the corporate semtor detracted from Mums as renewed Mrsund and economic recovery expectations poised the rector to outperform. ,The District is holding 1,60D,DOD per of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001-IC,6.931%coupon.Maros maturity,reprettnung 0.4%ofthe portfolio. The smurity wn purchased on ivIM001 and was Moe pe n ly downgraded by Moody's from A3 anBAI on 9/I8/01 and S&P from A.to BBB on 9120/01. The District's imesrmrnt policy requires;a minimum Ming ofA3 by Moody's or A-by S&P A the time of pumhm. G:Ib�Yt^mIAUAIpIhmrY/�•n/-1mnNe.O/.NT.d,r a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE; - 1 BASE, USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-NOV-2001 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,372,250.84 6,372,250.84 14.71% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,954,520.16 2,954,520.16 6.82% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS T14AN IYR 2,310,210.08 2,310,210.08 5.33% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 7,308,586.16 7,308,586.16 16.87% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 18,945,567.24 18,945,567.24 43.74% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �4, d5,5� 18,945,567.24 �B_.749/b R00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 8,395,889.56 8,347,003.17 19.27% 48,886.39 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 2,599,828.13 2,600,000.00 6.00% 171.87 BANKING&FINANCE 9,677,199.10 8,616,244.21 19.89% -60,954.89 INDUSTRIAL. 1,804,434.90 1,795,720.40 4.15% -8,714.50 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,949,831.00 1,930,331.00 4.46% .19,500.00 UTILITY-GAS 516,560.00 514,600.00 1.19% -1,960.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,943,742.69 23,803,998.79 54.96% -139,843.91 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 23,943,742.69 23,803,898.78 SK961/6 -139,843.91 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 562,738.59 562,73839 1.30% 0.00 TOTAL 562,739.59 562,738.59 1.30% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 562,738.59 562,738.59 1.30% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 43,452,04932 43,312,204.61 100.00% -139,843.91 10-Dec-2001 14:42:13 EYembe Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSr07522202 30-NOV-2001 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 4,085,287.00 4,085,287.00 1.15% 0.00 PAYABLES 40,925,250.00 40,825,250.00 -11.49% 0.00 TOTAL .36,739,963.00 -36,739,963.00 -10.340/a 0.00 UNITED STATES MUTUAL FUNDS 38,333,135.98 38,333,135.98 10.79% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 38,333,135.98 38,333,135.98 10,79% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,593, 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 23,424,433.12 24,420,000AI 6.879/o 995,567.29 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,426,628.28 32,628,939.79 9.191y. 3,202,311.51 U.S.AGENCIES 129,160,961.54 133,918,429.19 37.70% 4,757,467.65 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 32,035,183.44 32,178,899.72 9.06% 143,715.28 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 9,038,737.62 9,260,404.35 2.61% 221,666.73 FRLMC POOLS 5,023,491.08 5,029,754.59 1.42% 6,263.51 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,142,987.02 4,152,169.22 1.17% 9,182.20 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 4,597,107.68 4,514,582.34 1.27% -82,525.34 BANKING&FINANCE 40,983,592.57 41,467,268.51 11.67% 483,675.94 INDUSTRIAL. 31,536,975.00 31,800,959.00 8.95% 264,084.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,938,115.00 4.21% 316,105.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,306,789.00 2.06% 6,789.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,593,375.00 2.14% 96,120.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 338,789,262.35 349,209,685.12 98.31% 10,420,422.77 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 338,789,262.35 349,209,685.12 98.31% 10,420,422.77 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,427,445.38 4,427,445.38 1.25% - 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.43:05 Executor Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-NOV-2001 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS TOTAL 4,427,445.38 4,427,445.38 1.25% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,427,445-M 4,427,44538 1.25% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 344,808 M.71 3S5,230,30.3.48 100.00% 10,420,422.77 -TO--Ds ,ffil 14 0505 FT mdm Earkbewh - YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCSP07511102 2001/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/01 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIRE t 14.18.01 PAR VALOR YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE HANUUIT VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 7,308,506.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HUNT .000 2.212 AM 100.000 7,308,586.16 38.57 996095247 AAA 7,308,586.16 17.10 1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 2.006 .000 P-1 99.694 1,495,416.67 7.89 63743DAP6 01/23/2002 1,495,416.67 3.50 15,ODO.00 FEDERAL RUNE LN MTG CORP DISC 2.116 .000 P-1 99.259 14,888.87 .07 313397UP4 HAT 03/22/2002 A-1+ 14,988.87 .03 1,000,000.00 BROWN DICKINSON DISC 2.119 .000 P-1 99.131 991,308.33 5.23 075MSDRI 04/25/2002 991,308.33 2.32 1,700,000.00 GENERAL RLEC CAP DISC 2.177 .000 P-1 99.699 1,694,876.39 8.94 36959HIL4 12/20/2001 1,694,076.39 3.96 40,000.00 FEDERAL PARK BE CONS SYSTBMHID 2.263 .000 P-1 91.428 39,775.00 .20 313313TR9 MAT 02/2B/2001 A-1+ 39,775.00 .09 2,000,000.00 AS RICAN EY CA COMP 2.297 .000 P-1 99.701 1,994,020.56 10.52 02581R802 12/12/2001 1,994,020.56 4.66 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 3.306 .000 P-1 98.294 2,162,462.50 11.41 313589UG6 NAT 03/15/2002 A-1+ 2,162,462.50 5.06 200,000.00 SECTOR DICKINSON DISC 3.336 .000 P-1 98.314 196,628.89 1.03 07588SCB7 03/11/2002 196,620.09 .46 173,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN MTG CORP DISC 3.543 .000 P-1 98.775 170,880.75 .90 3133970KO MAT 12/12/2001 A-1+ 170,800.75 .40 150,000.00 FEDERAL NATL STU ASSN DIWOUNT 3.635 .000 P-1 98.499 147,747.58 .77 3135090HO HAT A-1+ 147,747.56 .35 2,600,000.00 FEDERAL EONS LN KTG CORP DISC 3.705 .000 P-1 98.340 2,556,840.00 13.49 313397RS9 NAT 12/28/2001 A-1+ 2,556,840.00 5.98 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE , 2 MSP07511202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/01 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIER 1 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARRET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 175,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN STU COUP DISC 3.921 .000 P-1 98.363 172,135.54 .90 313397QMG MAT 12/14/2001 A-1+ 172,135.54 .40 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL CASH 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS 1.11I 1.215 10,945,567.24 100.00 18,945,567.24 44.31 FIKBD INCOME SECURITIES 250,000.00 GENERAL STAG MIN ITS 00555 .000 2.411 A2 99.948 249,260.00 1.04 37042MCO MIS AT 01/28/2002 US 01/26/00 A+ 249,070.00 .58 2,600,000.00 STUDENT IN MRRTQR5SN STU .000 2.069 AEA 100.000 2,599,828.13 10.92 86307TBD3 VAR RT 12/20/2001 DD 06/21/01 AAA 2,600,000.00 6.08 1,100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN BTU .000 1.949 AAA 100.015 1,099,601.56 4.62 86387TMI VAR AT 01/17/2002 DO 0I/19/01 AAA 1,100,165.00 2.50 100,000.00 PESERAL HOME IA ETD co" MAE 2.181 4.746 AAA 100.078 100,112.00 .42 3134A2E]0 4.0501 12/14/2001 DO 12/07/98 AAA 100,078.00 .23 900,000.OD VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PNR 1ST 6 REP 2.329 3.197 A2 102.479 927,901.00 3.0I 927004CDI 3.375% 07/01/2002 DO 07/14/92 A 922,311.00 2.16 25,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ADDS MTN 2.529 6.551 AAA 102.281 25,647.25 .10 31364CQ92 6.000% 06/04/2002 DO 06/04/97 AAA 25,570.25 .06 50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RK CONS BOB 2.567 6.137 AAA 101.187 50,713.00 .21 3133M9U67 6.210% 03/15/2002 DD 09/15/99 AAA 50,593.50 .12 50,000.00 FEDERAL HOKE LM ARB CONS BDS 2.538 6.191 AAA 101.672 50,932.5D .21 3133NA2E1 6.295% 04/25/2002 DO 10/25/99 AAA 50,836.00 .12 25,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BK CONS BD 2.718 5.356 AAA 101.016 25,292.75 .10 3133MBCL6 5.410% 03/26/2002 DO 03/26/99 AAA 25,254.00 .06 20,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN BR CONS ADS 2.726 5.323 AAA 101.437 20,302.4D .08 3333MBRB2 5.450% 05/10/2002 DO 05/10/99 AAA 20,287.40 .05 20,000.00 FBDEUAL HONE LU SYS COUP DEB 2.730 6.715 AAA 101.719 20,402.20 .08 3134AIMO 6.830E 04/16/2002 DD 04/16/97 AAA 20,343.80 .05 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 OCSP07511102 2001/11/30 RUN MTE x 12/06/01 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING RINI TIM t 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MERRY, VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 25,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN RR CONS EDE 2.332 6.334 AAA 101.660 25,468.00 .10 3133M05A5 6.0250 04/04/2002 DO 04/04/97 AAA 25,415.00 .06 555,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP HT 2.365 6.561 A2 102.117 568,475.40 2.38 441012MP 6.700% 06/15/2002 DO 06/00/95 A 566,749.35 1.33 35,D00.00 FEDERAL NONE LN GEN CONS BD 2.375 6.491 AAA 100.750 35,300.28 .14 313395LY9 6.540E 02/05/2002 DO 02/05/97 AAA 35,262.50 .08 200,D00.00 NAL RARE STORES INC NT 3.159 6.316 MY 102.36E 206,194.00 .96 931142BG3 6.035E 00/01/2002 DD O9/01/00 AA 204,736.00 .48 145,000.00 DONALUSON LUMIN 3ENRETI 3.162 5.000 M3 101.153 147,009.70 .61 257661MI 5.035E 04/01/2002 DD 03/23/99 A- 146,671.85 .34 530,000.00 PHILIP HOMIS COS SP 3.250 6.934 A2 102.751 546,938.20 2.2E 7101548VO 7.125E 00/15/2002 DO 00/15/92 A- 544,580.30 1.27 325,000.00 ANERICAN GEN FIN SIR 9TR 00324 3.27B 6.417 A2 102.079 333,050.25 1.31 02635PPM9 6.550E 06/24/20D2 DO 06/24/99 A+ 331,756.75 .78 115,000.00 MINLERCHRYSLER NA ELDG CORP 3.503 3.063 A3 100.877 116,769.05 .40 233835AF4 3.125% 03/01/2002 DO 03/15/00 A- 116,008.55 .27 500,000.00 FTDERAL SONS LN BE CONS HIS 3.638 4.460 AAA 100.095 502,690.00 2.11 3133ME6R3 4.500E 04/04/2002 DO 04/D4/01 AAA 504,475.00 1.18 100,000.00 FZUERAL ROM LN BE CONS BOB 3.602 5.694 AAA 200.109 100,681.00 .42 3133MOMS 5.300E 22/14/2001 DO 06/14/99 AAA 100,109.00 .23 70,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN BE CONS HIS 3.304 6.033 AAA 100.281 70,595.70 .29 3133N94R0 6.050E 12/28/2001 DO 06/28/99 AAA 70,196.70 .16 190,000.00 PEDBRAL ROM IN BE CONS BOB 3.301 .000 AAA 99.734 177,300.00 .35 3133MSMMI EEROCPH O1/17/2002 DO 09/04/90 AAA 179,521.20 .42 1,100,000.00 FIRST HE CORD SUB NT 3.801 3.922 A2 102.565 1,139,714.00 4.33 33]358AN] 0.125E 06/24/2002.DO 06/24/92 A- 1,128,215.00 2.64 605,000.00 CIT GROUP ELDG9 INC 3.806 6.238 A2 102.190 619,520.00 2.59 1255690P5 6.335E 08/01/2002 DO 03/28/93 A4 610,297.90 1.45 2D0,D00.00 FEDERAL NAIL KID MEN MIN 3.009 6.039 AAA 102.656 204,609.00 .06 31364C3N6 6.2400 07/29/2002 DO O7129197 ARA 205,312.00 AN Yl. A AL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4 MSFO7511102 2001/11/30 RUE DATE t 12/06/01 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 14.18.01 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT BOOST BARRET TOTAL CCST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD 6-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ ____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB MIN 4 M00405 3.953 5.636 A2 102.021 610,968.00 2.57 0739286N4 5.750% 08/12/2002 DD 02/12/01 A 612,126.00 1.43 17S,000.00 FEDERAL ROVE LN HE CONS BOB 3.959 4.D09 AAA 100.030 175,109.39 .33 3133SFAEl 4.0809 06/06/2002 DO 06/06/01 AAA 175,052.50 .41 135,000.00 EORAUN STANLEY DEAN BITTER 3.972 6.224 AA3 102.429 130.O79.35 .58 610446CQ0 6.375% 00/01/2002 DD 07/28/97 AA- 130,279.15 .32 150,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LN UK CONE DUE 4.022 4.179 AAA 100.030 150,140.63 .63 3133SFBK3 4.1801 06/07/2002 DD 06/07/01 AAA 150,045.00 .35 100,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LE BE CONS BDS 4.146 4.980 AAA 100.310 100,496.00 .42 3133M1408 4.995% 01/08/2002 DD D1/O6/99 AAA 100,310.00 .23 500,000.00 PUBLIC SW ELEC GAS ITS 00008 4.209 6.906 A3 102.920 516,560.00 2.16 74456OAN9 0.9008 09/06/2002 DD 01/06/00 A- 514,600.00 1.20 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL ROSE LN BE CONS BUS 4.246 6.698 AAA 200.781 4,278,014.00 13.78 3133MQJI 6.750% 02/01/2002 DD 02/01/00 AAA 4,232,002.00 9.90 20,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN U COMB BDS 4.273 5.805 AAA 101.984 20,272.60 .08 3133E93B6 5.9201 06/14/2002 DD 06/14/99 AAA 20,396.80 .05 1,180,000.00 mus PARCH 6 CO SUB ET 4.285 8.160 AA3 102.639 1,224,296.70 5.08 94974OWS 8.3751 05/15/2002 DD 05/26/92 A 1,211,128.40 2.83 500,000.00 BANE ONE CORP SUB 4.300 0.908 Al 101.406 514,280.00 2.13 06423AAA1 8.1001 03/01/2002 DD 03/01/92 A- 501.030.00 1.19 85,000.00 FORD UPS CR CO NTS 4.319 6.401 A2 102.331 86,759.50 .36 345397RS4 6.550E 09/30/2D02 DD 09/10/97 SRB4 86,981.35 .20 1,200,000.00 GOLDEN NEST TIM CORP DEL SUB 4.332 8.200 A3 102.140 1r230,614.00 5.14 381317AF3 9.335% 04/15/200Z OD 04/30/92 A- 1,225,680.00 2.83 75,000.00 BANK ONE CORP HT 4.366 6.249 AA3 102.430 76,443.75 .32 06423AAC0 6.400% 08/01/2002 DD 07/22/99 A 76,922.50 .18 60,000.00 CURER MAEBATTAN CORD NEB SUB 4.309 0.410 Al 102.466 61,645.00 .25 16161ABR7 8.6256 05/01/2002 DD 05/01/92 Aa 61,479.60 .24 51,000.00 EBRIUTAN BRNCORP INC SUB DEB 4.410 3.669 A2 102.681 52,596.30 .21 589500AB5 7.8751 D7/1512002 DD 07/15/92 A- 52,367.31 .12 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PARE 5 OCSF01511302 2001/11/30 RON DAM t 12/06/01 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM t 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MAEET TOTAL C0ST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE SANEST VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 605,000.00 BARBARORICA CORP SUB NT 4.424 0.259 RAI 101.410 697,016.50 2.83 066050BQ3 6.3058 03/15/2002 A 684,517.50 1.60 1,000,000.00 TEXAS UTILO ELEC CO 1ST AIR 4.480 8.060 A3 100.902 1,021,850.00 4.23 992850SP6 8.125% 02/01/2002 BBB+ 1,000,020.00 2.36 247,000.00 FEDERAL PARK CR BAN CONS DE08 4.600 5.133 AAA 100.516 248,044.81 1.04 3133IMFS 5.200% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/01 AAA 248,234.52 .58 1,015,OOO.00 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC COOP NT 4.633 0.124 A3 103.094 1,051,302.70 4.39 960402AP0 9.335% 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/92 A- 1,046,404.10 2.45 300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ABBN DENS 4.7BI 6.592 AAA 100.500 304,220.00 1.26 31359KFF5 6.625% 01/15/2002 DD 1/14/2000 AAA 301L500.00 .71 200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KTG ABBN DEB 4.840 7.426 AAA 101.000 204L660.00 .04 3135063E1 7.500% 02/11/2002 DO 2/10/92 AAA 202,000.00 .40 150,000.00 FEDERAL BOM LN BE CONS BDS 4.840 6.922 AAA 101.125 152,959.50 .63 3133MATE9 18 02/25/2002 DO 02/25/2000 AAA 151,687.50 .35 150,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KTO ABBN KIN 4.840 6.241 AAA 100.761 151,902.00 .63 31364CKL8 6.290% 02/11/2002 DO 02/11/97 AAA 151,171.50 .35 100,000.00 FEDERAL BOME LN BR CONS BOB 4.944 4.859 AAA 100.344 99,936.00 .42 3133M7DR4 4.835% 01/22/2002 DO O1/20/99 AAA 100,344.00 .23 500,000.00 OKAC MTN 5.010 5.349 A2 100.017 SOS,S60.00 2.10 37042WW5 5.3501 12/07/2001 DO 12/07/98 BBB+ 500,005.00 1.17 300,000.00 GSAC MTM 5.199 5.063 A2 100.726 302,149.00 1.26 33042NNN7 5.9101 03/11/2002 DO 03/10/99 A 302,170.00 .71 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2.523 5.241 23,943,742.69 100.00 23,803,999.79 55.65 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 2.219 4.331 42,889,309.93 100.00 42,749,466.02 100.00 YIAARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6 OCSPO7522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/01 DISTRICTt TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 4 14.10.01 PAN VALUB YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD S-P PRICE EXPECT VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH A CASE EQUIVALENTS 38,333,135.9E DREYFUS TREASURY CASH ROM .000 2.212 AAA 100.000 38,333,135.90 100.00 996085247 AAA 39,333,135.90 9.89 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS .000 2.212 38,333,135.99 100.00 38,333,135.98 9.09 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 10,000,000.00 COHNIT TO PUR PENA SF MPG .000 6.O67 AAA 98.891 20,037,500.00 2.83 O1F0606C4 6.000% 12/01/2031 AAA 9,889,062.50 2.55 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GERA I SF HTO .000 6.406 AAA 101.469 10,710,000.00 3.05 OIN0626CI 6.500% 12/15/2031 AAA 10,654,245.00 2.75 14,000,000.00 COHNIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MG .000 7.599 AAA 105.313 14,743,750.00 4.22 O1N0806C3 8.000E 12/15/2031 AAA 14,743,820.00 3.00 7,500,000.00 ANHEUSER BUSCH COS INC NT .000 6.598 Al 102.298 7,646,250.00 2.19 035229AY9 6.250% 06/01/2005 ED 06/05/95 A+ 7,672,350.00 1.98 900,000.00 HEAR STEARNS HIN 4 IN 00459 .000 2.390 A2 100.015 899,4D6.DO .25 023928VC4 FLTO AT 12/02/2003 DD 08/17/01 A 900,135.00 .23 1,200,000.00 CONNIT TO PUR GERA II .3UHE0S .000 3.455 AAA 100.609 1,254,ODO.00 .34 21HOI26C5 7.5008 12/20/2031 AAA 1,207,312.50 .31 4,500,000.00 DAIHLER CHRYSLER NA CORP NT .ODO 3.930 A3 99.750 4,491,345.00 1.2E 233835AN9 MOB AT 12/16/2002 DD 12/15/00 HE, 4,480,750.00 1.16 563,748.83 FBI= GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 3.331 AAA 102.309 578,010.72 .16 3128DBMZ I.SDOB 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 BAR 576,765.79 .25 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME M BE CONS BUS .000 6.514 BAR 109.375 7,997,625.00 2.34 3133NAUN3 2.1251 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 0,203,125.00 2.12 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CONS BDB .ODO I.SIO AAA 101.469 20,485,937.50 5.81 3133HASN2 7.620% 03/08/2005 DD 03/OB/00 AAA 20,293,800.00 5.24 28,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BE CONS DEBS .000 4.998 AAA 101.844 28,032,812.50 8.16 313311,RR6 5.090% 07/26/2004 DD 07/26/01 AAA 28,516,320.00 7.36 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE , Y OCBF07522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TIME , 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NOODY RAREST TOTAL C0ST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOUR YIELD S-P PRICE MARNE VALUE R TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 202,003.65 FBLMC GROUP 9I9-6064 .000 6.264 AAA 101.563 197,079.83 .05 313488M83 6.384E 01/01/2029 DO 12/01/97 AAA 205,160.97 .05 770,285.59 GNHA II POOL 40080395 .000 5.401 AAA 101.828 763,304.88 .22 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 784,366.41 .20 6,545,043.63 GNMA II POOL 4000408X .000 5.401 AAA 201.828 6,4IB,570.52 1.90 36225CU28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 6,664,687.03 1.72 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MISS ACCEP HIS 400615 .000 2.500 A2 98.453 3,990,440.00 1.12 37042MBD FLTO RT 08/04/2003 DO O0/03/01 BBB. 3,938,120.00 1.02 4,OOO,DOO.00 HABIeCO INC NTB .000 5.960 A2 102.7I5 4,001,440.00 1.17 629527CAB VAR RT 02/01/2033 DO O1/22/98 A 4,111,000.00 1.06 3,500,000.00 PARANONT COHMUNICATIONS INC ST .000 7.450 A3 100.559 3,550,470.00 1.00 699216AG2 7.500% 01/15/2002 DD 01/15/92 A- 3,519,565.00 .91 5,000,000.00 PHILIP NORRIS COB INC HTS .ODD 6.996 A2 107.206 5,263,000.00 1.53 710154CHO I.5000 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,360,300.00 1.39 4,130,525.49 BEE GTD DEW PARTH 2001-20C 1 .000 1.137 AAA 103.315 4,130,525.49 1.22 83162CW0 6.3401 03/01/2021 AAA 4,267,452.41 1.10 2,997,107.68 SEA GTD PARTS CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.297 AAA 105.440 2,997,107.60 .90 03164IDD4 6.6401 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 3,160,150.34 .62 1,600,D00.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTSRU 01-1 C .000 8.070 A3 84.652 1,600,000.00 .38 909317BC2 6.8311 09/01/2006 DD 00/22/01 A- 1,354,432.00 .35 2,100,000.00 U 3 THREE MY BONDS .000 6.503 AAA 134.562 2,881,767.00 .SO 912SIODYI 09.750% 05/15/2017 00 05/15/87 AAA 2,025,802.00 .73 1,191,071.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.351 AAA 103.312 6,316,035.52 1.83 9128234Y5 3.075% 01/15/2009 DO O1/15199 AAA 6,401,264.87 1.65 3,800,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES .000 5.800 AAA 112.062 4,079,953.13 1.21 9120275ZI D6.5000 02/15/2010 OD 02/15/00 AAA 4,250,356.00 1.10 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA BLEC 6 PER O1 HER A .000 5.637 A3 102.007 3,487,680.00 1.02 927804END 5.350% 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,570,245.00 .92 25,879,030.00 UB TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.817 3.330 AAA 101.344 23,210,592.76 7.51 9128272H3 3.3750 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 AAA 26,227,654.92 6.77 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSF07522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM , 14.10.01 PAR VALUE YTM AT CONSENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,944,589.20 SALOMON SMITE BARNEY BLDGS IMF 4.702 3.646 AA1 100.096 1,803,583.07 .55 79549BBG1 3.650% 02/14/2002 DO 02/14/97 A 1,946,456.01 .50 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MY 5.261 6.302 A3 203.782 1,438,920.00 .41 812400GN6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,452,934.00 .37 3,950,000.00 GRAC NTS 5.752 2.240 A2 98.211 3,918,769.50 1.11 37D4250V5 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 A 3,879,334.50 1.00 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD MEN 5.849 6.469 A3 102.484 3,073,170.00 .80 81240QOAl 6.630E 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,074,520.00 .79 2,000,000.00 BANTERS TR NY CORE GLOBAL NT 5.001 2.122 Al 99.749 1,992,800.00 .57 066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 AA- 1,994,980.00 .51 15,500,000.00 PEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN USE 5.967 6.505 AAA 109.531 16,154,410.00 4.86 31359MF81 7.125E 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,977,305.00 4.38 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTB TELECOMNUNICATION9 6.010 5.926 MY 101.245 7,497,255.00 2.17 079867MS VAR AT 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 AAA 7,593,375.00 1.96 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.521 A2 103.515 3,030,250.00 .89 059165DN7 6,750% 12/15/2002 DO 12/20/00 Aa 3,105,450.00 .80 9,500,000.00 U N TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.361 AAA 137.562 12,332,187.50 3.74 912810209 00.750% 00/15/2020 DD O8/15/90 AAA 13,068,390.00 3.37 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER PINT, LLC EYE 6TROD615 6.154 2.257 A3 99.406 1,499,415.00 .42 17120QZBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 A 1,491,090.00 .38 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DENS 6.271 3.212 Al 99.932 2,994,300.00 .85 209111CUS VAR RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 Al 2,997,960.00 .77 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MISS 6.291 6.169 AAA IOD.984 4,489,705.00 1.30 31364CKV5 6.2301 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,544,280.00 1.17 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MIRE ACCEP #TR 00562 6.3D3 2.213 A2 98.718 3,793,958.00 1.07 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 OD 02/14/OO BBB+ 3,751,284.00 .97 2,139,759.00 FILM MULTICLA88 CTF E3 A 6.316 5.984 AAA 96.673 2,142,099.02 .59 3133=995 VAR AT O9/15/2032 AAA 2,068,569.22 .53 1,923,598.17 GNRA GTD URIC TR 2000-9 FE 6.320 2.569 AAA 100.503 1,823,598.17 .52 383704NE9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,832,770.87 .47 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAOB 9 OCSF03522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TINE 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY HARRET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.460 A2 104.409 2,031,960.00 .59 D73902MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 2,089,340.00 .54 3,000,000.00 FORD EYE CR CO GLOBAL LANDNARE 6.350 3.387 A2 99.609 3,000,000.00 .84 345397SRS FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,958,270.00 .76 2,000,000.00 FORD SIR CA CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 2.132 A2 90.593 1,992,580.00 .56 345390RV3 FLTO RT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/98 A 1,971,860.00 .51 22,139.31 GNEA POOL 10500917 6.389 6.043 AAA 99.281 21F015.05 .00 36210SPA0 6.0001 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 21,990.13 .01 60,SB6.33 GNNA POOL #0506636 6.389 6.043 AAA 99.281 65,103.43 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 60,093.19 .02 868,227.81 ONHA POOL #0503389 6.389 6.043 AAA 99.281 824,130.12 .24 36210W55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 861,985.25 .22 26,063.66 GNNA POOL #0499153 6.399 6.043 AAA 99.291 24,740.13 .00 3621000RS 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 25,676.28 .01 14,222.24 GERA POOL 40496284 6.390 6.042 AAA 99.312 13,500.02 .00 36210N352 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 14,124.39 .00 048,695.93 GERA POOL #0496461 6.390 6.042 AAA 99.312 805,598.07 .24 36210NON4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD O1/01/99 AAA 042,856.90 .22 236,517.65 OKRA POOL /0491103 6.390 6.042 AAA 99.312 224,506.99 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/02/99 AAA 234,890.41 .06 21,994.79 OEM POOL 40486720 6.390 6.042 AAA 99.312 20,871.87 .00 36210AWS 6.0001 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 21,843.47 .01 42,405.99 GNNA POOL #0497343 6.390 6.042 AAA 99.312 40,252.57 .01 36210NP45 6.000% 12/15/2026 DO 12/01/99 AAA 42,114.24 .01 43,586.11 ONNA POOL #0469698 6.391 6.042 AAA 99.312 41,372.76 .01 362099MB 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/90 AAA 43,286.24 .01 53,338.54 OSHA POOL #0467279 6.391 6.042 AAA 99.312 50,629.95 .01 36209CC07 6.000E 10/15/2020 OD 10/01/98 AAA 52,971.57 .01 33,409.86 CNN& POOL #0457814 6.391 6.042 AAA 99.312 73,470.89 .02 362080SB3 6.000% 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/99 AAA 76,877.28 .02 YLDASAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 10 OCSFOI522202 2001/11/30 RON DATB 12/06/01 DISMICT, I -TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 14.10.01 PM VALUE YTN AT CURMST MOODY NARMT TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION EMS YIELD S-P PRICE NARMT VALOR t TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 691,393.80 GMA POOL /0467206 6.391 6.042 ARA 99.312 656,264.04 .19 36209CC82 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/90 AAA 686,637.09 .18 831,675.40 GMA POOL #0465555 6.392 6.042 AM 99.312 789,441.86 .23 36209M40 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 025,953.47 .21 32,557.04 GNM POOL #0403452 6.392 6.042 AM 99.312 30,903.74 .00 36209MV3 6.0001 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AM 32,333.05 .01 860,648.31 GNRA POOL #0465546 6.392 6.042 AAA 99.312 016,943.51 .24 36209MT3 6.000t 09/15/2028 DO 08/01/9B AAA 054,727.05 .22 390,352.09 GMA POOL #0460339 6.392 6.042 AM 99.312 750,217.70 .22 36209DHW 6.0001 OB/15/2028 DO 08/01/9B AAA 784,915.16 .20 41,462.22 GNMA POOL /0438057 6.393 6.042 AM 99.312 39,355.73 .01 36207PM9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO OS/01/98 AAA 41,175.97 .01 41,263.28 GMA POOL 00460330 6.393 6.042 AAA 99.312 39,072.95 .02 36209DBF4 6.0001 05/15/2020 DO 0510119E AAA 40,800.09 .01 2,000,000.00 PBLNC NULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.239 AAA 104.190 2,000,680.00 .59 3133MPV2 6.500% 09/25/2010 AAA 2,063,600.00 .54 2,663,335.47 FRIM NULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.499 6.140 AAA 93.713 2,507,195.53 .I4 3133T17A4 6.0000 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,602,533.65 .63 1,000,000.00 SAIl1NON SB SLDGS NTN 6.625 2.556 M1 100.156 1,000,000.00 .20 19548E228 FLTO RT 04/20/2003 DO 04/28/00 M- 1,001,560.00 .26 4,183,032.65 FSLIC GROUP IG5-0476 6.628 6.893 AAA 101.549 4,246,392.53 1.21 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/90 AAA 4,247,927.83 1.10 1,061,014.07 GNM II POOL 4000089H 6.3D5 6.216 AAA 102.563 1,085,041.26 .31 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AM 1,081,029.36 .28 2,000,000.00 SAMS 6 NCMNNAN COS INC 8R OT 6.713 6.245 A2 106.077 1,992,280.00 .60 57174BMB 6.6251 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/91 M- 2,121,540.00 .55 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GWM LMDNAIUt 6.739 6.444 M 103.968 2,995,080.00 .89 345397S33 6.7009 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 3,119,040.00 .00 900,000.00 FSDBRAL SONG M BR CONS SOS 6.337 6.698 AAA 100.701 899,550.00 .25 3133MWI 6.750t 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 907,029.00 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/U1 DISTRICTz TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM t 14.18.01 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY NARRET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MANNY VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ _________- 2,500,000.OD COUNTRINIDE NONE LEE INC HT 6.966 6.463 A3 105.995 2,498,400.00 .75 22237UMB 6.850E 06/15/2004 DO O6/24/99 A 2,649,875.00 .68 I,300,OOD.00 OMOR INC MN NT 6.960 3.000 A2 1DO.093 7,300,000.00 2.09 682600AJ2 FLTG AT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,306,799.00 1.89 I00,223.50 MM II POOL #0000023 6.992 7.392 AAA 103.156 711,820.96 .20 36225CM9 VAR AT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 722,322.55 .19 7,000,000.00 OLD SENT M HER EB 00001 7.004 2.187 AA3 99.7B1 7,000,000.00 2.00 67982%AA6 VAR AT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 Ai 6,984,670.00 1.00 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL MIL NTG ASSN ONES 7.113 6.092 AAA 108.I50 2,030,133.00 .65 31359MYS 6.625E 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,283,750.00 .59 2,000,000.00 LOM ISLAND LTG CO DES 7.512 7.974 BM3 102.828 2,152,250.00 .56 542671CT1 8.200E 03/15/2023 DO 03/20/93 A- 2,056,560.00 .53 1,280,458.81 GMYSTONE SVCNG CORD FM 495-7 7.564 7.368 AAA 100.044 1,261,752.09 .36 398108AE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AM 1,291,262.68 .33 1,000,000.00 FORD NOTOR CR CO RT 7.582 6.499 A2 103.86I 965,190.00 .29 345393GV9 6.350E 05/15/2005 MB4 1,038,670.00 .29 ,964,2B5.83 NNP/MNTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 7.604 7.20 AAA 103.469 943,342.75 .28 302996GE3 1.500E 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 957,734.49 .26 3,000,000.00 PACIPICORP DECO HIS 4TR 00115 7.309 6.82I A2 106.930 2,950,530.DD .91 69512EEU5 1.300E 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,20I,900.DO .03 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL STU ASSN KIN 7.I24 6.431 AAA 101.OI8 32,498,400.D0 10.18 31364GYJ2 6.500E 03/12/2009 DO 03/12/0 AAA 35,579,456.00 9.1E YLUANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 12 OCSF01522202 2001/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/01 DISTRICTz LONG-TERN OPRRATING RUN TINE 14.19.01 PAR VALOR YTN AT CONSENT NODDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 9-P PRICE MERRY VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ ------ ------- ------- ________ ___________ __________ 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 3.967 7.191 Al 109.509 1,594,032.00 .50 020002AL5 7.975% 05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 Ai 1,752,144.00 .45 ___ __ _______ ---------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCURS SECURITIES 1.922 5.667 330,789,262.35 100.00 349,209,495.12 90.08 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 1.918 5.660 377,122,390.33 100.00 387,542,821.10 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' I PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 519,837.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2001 -518,837.50 996085247 01-Nov-2001 518,837.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 518,837.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2001 -518,837.50 996085247 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 01-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 142,225.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2001 -142,225.42 996095247 01-Nov-2001 142,225.42 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 142,225.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2001 -142,225.42 996085247 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 01-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 120,947.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 -120,947.51 996095247 02-Nov-2001 120,947.51 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 120,947.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 -120,947.51 996085247 02-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 02-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 74.34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROILER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 83,123.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 -83,123.77 996085247 02-Nov-2001 83,123.77 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 93,123.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 -83,123.77 996085247 02-Nov-200I 0.00 FC 02-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,296.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2001 48,296.20 996085247 05-Nov-2001 48,296.20 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,296.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 05-Nov-2001 -48,296.20 996095247 05-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 629,843.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Nov-2001 -629,843.75 996085247 07-Nov-2001 629,843.75 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 629,843.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Nov-2001 -629,843.75 996085247 07-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 07-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,884,750.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2001 -1,884,750.04 996085247 13-Nov-2001 1,884,750.04 B 0.00 10-Dec-200/ 14:34:55 Ex frw Wgrkbm ch . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,884,750.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2001 -1,884,750.04 996085247 13-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 91,000.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2001 -91,000.51 996085247 13-Nov-2001 91,000.51 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 91,000.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2001 -91,000.51 996085247 13-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 147,330.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Nov.2001 ,147,330.86 996085247 14-Nov-2001 147,330.86 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 147,330.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Nov-2001 -147.330.86 996085247 14-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 14-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 14-Nov-2001 -14,888.87 313397UP4 MAT0322/2002 15-Nov-2001 14,899.97 B BANK ONE CAPITAL CORP,COLUM 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 14-Nov-2001 .14,999.87 313397UP4 MAT 0322/2002 15-Nov-2001 0.00 PC BANK ONE CAPITAL CORP,COLUM 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 &ecu!!ve Workbench RANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 670,281.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I5-Nov-2001 -670,281.96 996085247 15-Nov-2001 670,281.96 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 670,291.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2001 -670,291.96 996095247 15-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 995,859.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2001 -995,859.24 996085247 15-Nov-2001 995,859.24 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 995,959.24 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2001 -995,859.24 996085247 15-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MINNESOTA MNG&MFG DISC 15-Nov-2001 -499,679.17 60406AYS4 1126/2001 15-Nov-2001 499,679.17 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MNNESOTA MNG&MFG DISC 15-Nov-2001 499.679.17 60406AYS4 1126/2001 15-Nov-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58,676.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2001 -58,676.57 996095247 I&Nov-2001 58,676.57 B 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58,676.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2001 -58,676.57 996085247 16-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,861.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCF 16-Nov-2001 -57,861.50 996087094 16-Nov-2001 57,861.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 66,909.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-2001 -66,909.00 9%085247 19-Nov-2001 66,909.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 66.909.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-2001 -66,909.00 996085247 19-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 19-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 439,440.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Nov-2001 439,440.78 996085247 20-Nov-2001 439,440.78 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 439,440.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Nov-2001 439,440.78 996085247 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,365.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2001 -20,365.40 996085247 21-Nov-2001 20,365.40 B 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Erecut/ve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,365.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2001 -20,365.40 996085247 21-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,885.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2001 -3,885.52 996085247 21-Nov-2001 3,885.52 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,885.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2001 -3,885.52 996095247 21-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 409,950.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Nov-2001 -409,950.00 996085247 23-Nov-2001 409,950.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 409,950.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Nov-2001 409,950.00 996085247 23-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 23-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-2001 -500,000.00 996095247 26-Nov-2001 500,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-2001 -500,000.00 996085247 26-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 26-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Den2001 14.34:55 Executive W9rkbeuc6 . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADULOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,851.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-2001 -20,851.33 996095247 26-Nov-2001 20,851.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,851.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-2001 -20,851.33 996085247 26-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 26-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 26-Nov-2001 -991,308.33 075SRSDRI 0425/2002 27-Nov-2001 991,308.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 26-Nov-2001 -991,308.33 07588SDRI 0425/2002 27-Nov-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,019,253.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2001 4,018,253.60 996085247 29-Nov-2001 4,018,253.60 g 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,018,253.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2001 4,018,253.60 996085247 29-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,583.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM'P 29-Nov-2001 4,583.33 996DB5247 29-Nov-2001 4,583.33 g 0.00 10-11ec-2001 14:34:55 Exeom/ve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,583.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2WI -4,593.33 996085247 29-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Nov-2001 -1,495,416.67 63743DAP6 01232002 29-Nov-2001 1,495,416.67 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1-500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Nov-2001 -1,495,416.67 63743DAP6 01232002 29-Nov-2001 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2001 -10.08 996085247 30-Nov-2001 10.08 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2001 -10.08 996085247 30-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL FARM BK CONS SYSTEMW 30-Nov-2001 -39,775.00 313313TR9 MAT02/282001 30-Nov-2001 39,775.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL FARM BK CONS SYSTEMW 30-Nov-2001 -39,775.00 313313TR9 MAT 02282001 30-Nov-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 30-Now2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10.Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 09.Oct-2001 -9,962,500.00 0IF0606B6 6,000%11/01/2031 14-Nov-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 15-Oct-2001 -11,216,562.50 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Oct-2001 -1,251,375.00 21HO726B7 7.500%11/20/2031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 17-Oct-2001 -14,752.500.00 01N0806B5 8.000%11/15/2031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 17-Oct-2001 3,377,656.25 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2031 20-Nov-2001 -3,577,656.25 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 623,864.31 GNMA POOL N0562016 17-Oct-2001 -637,706.30 36213RK55 6.500%08/15/2031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 637,706.30 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 623,864.31 GNMA POOL80562016 17-Oct-2001 -2,140.20 36213RK55 6.500%08/15/2031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 E:ecudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 623,964.31 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oc1-2001 -639,946.50 36213RK55 6.5000A08/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 134,399.91 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 -137,381.91 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 137,391.91 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 134,399.91 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 461.07 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD08/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 134,3919.91 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-00-2001 -137,842.98 36213NNR3 6.500%0 711 5203 1 DO 03/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 188,117.80 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 -192,291.66 36213NNR3 6.5000h 07/152031 DD 081011 20-Nov-2001 192,291.66 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 188,117.80 GNMA POOL90559400 17-Od-2001 -645.15 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 188,117.80 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 -192,937.01 36213NNR3 6.5000/007/15/2031 DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 10-1)ec-2001 14:34:53 Executive Workbe h, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,099.70 GNMA POOLOO559400 17-Oct-2001 -408,975.89 36213NNR3 6.500Yo 07/152031 DD OS/01/ 20-Nov-2001 408,975.89 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 -1,372.56 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Oct-2001 .410,348A5 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD08/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 -306,656.60 36213RK55 6.500%08/1 WWI DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 306,656.60 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 -1,029.17 36213RK55 6.500°h08/152031 DD081011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 -307,685.77 36213RK55 6.500^/e08/152031 DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 465,601.01 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 475,931.53 36213RK55 6.500%08/152031 DD ORIOU 20-Nov-2001 475,931.53 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 10-Dec-100/ 14:34.55 Exem&e Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAUWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 465,601.01 GNMA POOLM0562016 17.0ct-2001 -1,597.27 36213RK55 6.50D%0S/15/2031DD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 465,601.01 GNMA POOL80562016 17-Oct-2001 -477,528.80 36213RK55 6.500%09115203IDD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nav-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 189,117.80 GNMA POOL00559400 17-On-2001 -192,291.66 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO OWI/ 20-Nov-2001 192,291.66 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 198,117.90 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-Ocb2001 -645.35 36213NNR3 6.500%0 7/1 5203 1 DD OMI/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 198,117.90 GNMA POOL80559400 17-Od-2001 -192,937.01 36213NNR3 6.500%0 7/1 5 2 03 1 DD 081011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL 00559400 17-Oct-2001 ,408,975.89 36213NNR3 6.500%07/IS/2031 DO OMI/ 20-Nov-2001 408,975.99 B MEgIULL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL#0559400 17.Oob2001 .1,372.56 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.34:55 ----- -- - Executive Wgrkbench - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL#0559400 17-W-2001 410,349.45 36213NNR3 6.500%0 711 5 20 3 1 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 -306,656.60 36213RK55 6.500%08/15203I DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 306,656.60 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-OU-2001 -1,029.17 36213RK55 6.500Ne08/152031 DO OV01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300.000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 17-Oct-2001 -307,695.77 36213RK55 6.500%08/1512031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,049.09 GNMA POOL#0556535 17-Oct-2001 -511,143.93 36213KHL9 6.500%04/152031 DD 04/01/ 20-Nov-2001 511,143.93 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,049.09 GNMA POOL#0556535 17-Oct-2001 -1,715.45 36213KHL9 6.50016 04/152031 DO 04/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,049.09 GNMA POOL#0556535 17-Oct-2001 -512,859.39 36213KHL9 6.5000%04/152031 DD04/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.34:55 Execv!/ve Workbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 31-Oc1-2001 10,037,500.00 0IF0606C4 6.000%12/012031 13-Dec-2001 -10,037,500.00 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 31-Od-2001 -10,037,500.00 0IF0606C4 6.000%12/012031 13-Dco-2001 10,037,500.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS STR 0000 01-Nov-2001 -516,560.00 74456QAH9 7.900%09/062002 DO 09/06/0 06-Nov-2001 516,560.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS STR 0000 01-Nov-2001 -12,482.64 74456QAH9 7.900%09/06/2002 DO 09/06/0 06-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS NTR 0000 01-Nov-2001 -529,042.64 74456QAH9 7.900%09/062002 DO 0910610 06-Nov-2001 0.00 PC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 06-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN ST 02-Nov-2001 -399,875.00 86387THEI VAR RT 01/17/2002DD07/191 05-Nov-2001 399,975.00 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN ST 02-Nov-2001 -3,748.26 86387THE1 VAR RT 01/172002DD07/19/ 05-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34.55 Executive Wvkbench . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN ST 02-110v-2001 -403,623.26 86387THEI VAR RT 01/172002DD07/19/ 05-Nov-2001 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 STUDENT LN MRKTGASSN STN 02-NOV-2001 -599,906.25 86387THD3 FLTG RT 12202001 DO 0621/ 05-Nov-2001 599,90625 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 STUDENT LN MRKTGASSN STN 02-Nov-2001 -7,619.96 8638TT14D3 FLTG RT I2110200I DO 0621/ 05-Nov-200I 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600.000.00 STUDENT LN MRKTGASSN STN 02-Nov-2001 -607,525.21 86387THD3 FLTO RT 122WMI DD 0621/ 05-Nov-2001 0.00 FC DAN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 06-Nov.2001 -1,254,000.00 21H0726C5 7.500%1220/2031 20-DW-2001 1,254,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 STUDENT IN MRKTGASSN STN 07-Nov-200L -1,999,921.88 86387THD3 FLTG RT 12202001 DO 0621/ 08-Nov-2001 1,999,921.88 B DAN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MRKTGASSN STN 07-Nov-2001 -25,790.92 86387THD3 FLTG RT 12=001 DO 0621/ D&NOv-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 10-1) c,2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SE77L DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MRKTGASSN STN 07-Nov-2001 -2,025,702.70 86387rHD3 FLTG RT 121202001 DO 062l/ 08-Nov-2001 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC.MINN 08-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR IST&RE 13-Nov-2001 -927,981.00 927804CD4 7,375%07/012002 DO 0711419 16-Nov-2001 927,981.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 VIRGMIA ELEC&PWR 1ST&RE 13-Nov-2001 -24,890.62 927804CD4 7.375%07/012002 DO 07/1419 16-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 VIRGMIA ELEC&PWR IST&RE 13-Nov-2001 -952,871.62 927804CD4 7.375%07/012002 DD 07/1419 16-Nov-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA 1 SF MTG 13-Nov-2001 -14,743,750.00 OIN0806C3 8.000%12/152031 20-Da-2001 14,143,750.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 15-Nov-2001 -11,220,000.00 OIN0626CI 6.500^A 12/152031 20-Dec-2001 11,220,000.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA I SF MTG 15-Nov-2001 -3,570,000.00 OIN0626CI 6.500%12/152031 20-Dw2001 3,570,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 /O-Dec-200/ 14:34.55 Executive Wgrkbewh . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-Nov-2001 -20,495.60 719154BVS 7.125%09/152002 DID 08/159 21-NOV-2001 20,485.60 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-Nov-2001 -380.00 718154BV8 7.125%08/152002 DO 081159 21-Nov-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 16-Nov-2001 -20,865.60 718154BV8 7.125%08/152002 DO 091159 21-Nov-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 27-Nov-2001 -100,112.00 3134A27J0 4.750%12/142001 DO 121079 28-Nov-2001 100,112.00 e ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MFO CORP DEB 27-Nov-2001 -2.150.69 3134AZZ10 4.750%12/142001 DO I2/079 28-Nov-2001 0.00 1R 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MFG CORP DEB 27-Nov-2001 -102,262.69 3134A27J0 4.750%17JI420DI DO 121079 2844ov-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 29-Nov-2001 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10-Dec-1001 14:34:55 - Erccutive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000loo00 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SEITL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13.250.49 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-2001 -13,250.49 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Nov-2001 13.250.49 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13.250.49 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-2001 -13,250.49 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 23-Nov-2001 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,011,148,47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2001 1,011,149.47 996085247 05-Nov-2001 -1,011,149.47 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,011,148.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2001 1,011,148.47 996085247 05-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -529,042.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2001 529,042.64 996085247 06-Niv-2001 ,529,042.64 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -529,042,64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2001 529,042.64 996085247 06-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 06-74ov-2001 0.00 /0-Dec-2001 14.34:55 Executive Wprkbench . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,025,702.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Nov-2001 2,025,702.70 996085247 08-Nov-2001 -2,025,702.70 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,025,702.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-2001 2,025,702.70 996095247 08-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 08-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,852,871.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2001 852,871.62 996085247 16-Nov-2001 -952,871.62 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -852,871.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2001 852,871.62 996085247 16-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .57,861.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 19-Nov-2001 57,961.50 9%087094 19-Nov-2001 -57,86L50 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -991,308.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Nov-2001 991,308.33 996085247 27-Nov-2001 -991,308.33 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,991,308.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Nov-2001 991,308.33 9%085247 27-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 27-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dx-2001 14.34.55 Execnlive Workbench 01tAINGE COUNTY SANITATION DIS iiti(-1' PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAEVLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -102,262.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2001 102,262.69 9%085247 28-Nov-2001 -102,262.69 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -102,262.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2001 102,262.69 996085247 28-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 28-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -39,775.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2001 39,775.00 996095247 30-Nov-2001 -39,775.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -39,775.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2001 39,775.00 996085247 30-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 31-Oct-2001 10,073,437.50 0IF0606B6 6.0009%11/01/2031 14-Nov-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Nov-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 06-Nov-2001 1,254,843.75 21H0726B7 7.500%11202031 20-Nov-2001 -1,251,375.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 3.468.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 06-Nov-200I 1,254,943.75 21110726B7 7.500%11202031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dm-2001 14:34:55 Executive Wqa "'i h , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE) COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 13-Nov-2001 14,741,897.80 OIN0806BS 8.000%11/152031 20-Nov-2001 -14,752,500.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK -10,602.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Nov-2001 14,741,897.80 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/152031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -188,117.80 GNMA POOLOO559400 15-Nov-2001 192,468.02 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO 091011 20-Nov-2001 -192,291.66 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 176.36 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -188,11710 GNMA POOL#0559400 I3-Nov-2001 645.35 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD 0011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -188,117.80 ONMA POOLM0559400 15-Nov.2001 193,113.37 36213NNR3 6.500%OV15/2031 DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOLW0559400 15-Nov-2001 409,350.98 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 408,975.89 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 375.09 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,098.70 ONMA POOLN0359400 15-Nov-2001 1,372.56 36213NNR3 6,500%07/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Dwullve Workbench -- - - OR4P•��' ,: PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL80559400 IS-Nov-2001 410,723.54 36213NNR3 6.500%07/15/2031 DD08101/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.34 GNMA POOL80562016 15-Nov-2001 306,937.85 36213RK55 6.500%09/15/2031 DO 0S/01/ 20-Nov-2001 -306,656.60 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 291.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 MNov-2001 1,029.17 36213RK55 6.500%09/152031 DO O8101/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.34 ONMA POOL80562016 15-Nov-2001 307,%7.02 36213RK55 6.500%08/152031 DO 08MIl 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 465,601.01 GNMA POOL80562016 15-Nov-2001 476,368.03 36213RK55 6.500%06/152031 DDOSNI/ 20-Nov-2001 -475.931.53 S SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 436.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -465,601.01 GNMA POOL80562016 15-NOV-2001 1,597.27 36213RK55 6.500%08/152031DD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -465,601.01 GNMA POOL 00562016 1S-Nov-2001 477,965.30 36213RK55 6.500%OS/152031 DDO8/01/ 20-NOvd001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 206Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-1001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADEDATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -623.864.31 GNMA POOLM0562016 15-Nov-2001 638,291.17 36213RK55 6.500%08/15/2031 DD 081011 20-Nov-2001 -637,706.30 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 594.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -623,864.31 GNMA POOL80562016 15-Nov-2001 2,140.20 36213RK55 6.500%08/152031 DD 091011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -623,964.31 GNMA POOLM0562016 15-Nov-2001 640,431.37 36213RK55 6.500%08/15/2031 DO OWU 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov 2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -134,399.91 GNMA POOL 00559400 15-Nov-2001 137,507.91 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD 09/01/ 20-Nov-2001 -137.391.91 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 126.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -134,399.91 ONMA POOL40559400 15-Nov-2001 461.07 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DD 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -134,399.91 ONMA POOLM0559400 15-Nov-2001 137,969.99 36213NNR3 6.500%07/15203IDD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,188,117.80 GNMA POOL90559400 15-Nov-2001 192,468.02 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031DD09MI/ 20-Nov-2001 ,192,291.66 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 176.36 10-Dec-2001 14:34::55 Eoewive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -189,117.80 GNMA POOL80559400 15-Nov-2001 645.35 36213NNR3 6.5001/.07/15/2031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -189,117.80 GNMA POOL80559400 15-Nov-2001 193,113.37 36213NNR3 6.5WA07/152031 DD08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOLM0559400 15-Nov-2001 409,350.98 36213NNR3 6.500%07/15/2031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 408,975.99 S SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 375.09 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOL 00559400 15-Nov-2001 1,372.56 36213NNR3 6.500%071152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,098.70 GNMA POOLW0559400 15-Nov-2001 410,723.54 36213NNR3 6.500%07/152031 DO 08/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 20-No,2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.34 GNMA POOLN0562016 15-Nov-2001 306,937.85 36213PK55 6.500%08/152031 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 -306,656.60 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 281.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.34 GNMA POOL#0562016 15-Nov-2001 1,029.17 36213RK55 6.5000/.Ml 5/2031 DO 09/0It 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Dec-1001 14:34:55 Executive WPrkbench , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.34 GNMA POOL80562016 15-Nov-20DI 307,967.02 36213RK55 6.50D%0 811 52 0 3 1 DO 08/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 15-Nov-2001 11,254,375.00 OIN0626B3 6.5DO%11/152031 20-Nov-2001 -11,216,562.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 37,812.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTV, 15-Nov-2001 11,254,375.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/152031 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,049.09 GNMA POOL 80556535 15-Nov-2001 511,612.73 36213KHL9 6.50D%04/152031 DD04/01/ 20-Nov-2001 -511,143.93 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 468.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,049.09 GNMA POOL 80556535 15-Nov-2001 1.715.45 36213KHL9 6.500%04/152031 DO 04/011 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500.049.09 GNMA POOLOO556535 15-Nov-2001 513.328.18 36213KHL9 6.500%04/152031 DO 04/01/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2DO1 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,D00,ODO.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 26-Nov-2001 1,000,980.DO 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04282003 DID 0428/ 29-Nov-2001 -1,000,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 980.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34.55 Evmutive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,00D.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 26-Nov-2001 2,204.44 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04292003 DD 0428/ 29-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 26-Nov-2001 1,003,184.44 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 0428/ 29-Nov-200I 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 HELLER FINI,MTN FIR 00246 26-Nov-2001 3,008,430.00 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 0427/ 29-Nov-2001 -3,000,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 8,430.O0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN FIR 00246 26-Nov-2001 6,639.16 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 04271 29-Nov-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 8TR 00246 26-Nov-2001 3,015,069.16 42333RLF7 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DO 0427/ 29-Nov-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 26-Nov-2001 4,029,687.50 OIN0626C7 6.500%12/152031 20-De 2001 4,080,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY -50,312.50 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Fi culiw W9rkb=M . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SErFL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,869.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 15-Sep-2001 -57,869.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 15-Sep-2001 57,932.79 PDC 63.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,869.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Sep-2001 57,969.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 15-Sep-2001 -57,932.79 PD -63.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,869.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Sep-2001 57,869.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,862.50 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Oa-2001 3,862.50 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Oct-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -642.20 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 4000-11150 01-Oct-2001 642.20 302998GE3 7,500%12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-Oct-2001 -628.25 PD 13.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -642.20 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 4000-11150 01-OcF2001 642.20 302998GE3 7.500%1 210 12 03 0 DO 1021/9 01-Oct-2001 0.00 PC 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,593.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Oct-2001 48,593.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15.Oct-2001 48,646.64 PD -53.14 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Wmkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT„m PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL oCsc000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADULOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 42,451.22 GNMA 11 POOL 4080088M 01-Nov-2001 42,451.22 3622SOC20 7.375%06202027 DD 061011 01-Nov-2001 -43,379.84 PD -928.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,451.22 GNMA II POOL S090098M 01-Nov-2001 42,451.22 36225OC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/0l/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,121.85 GNMA POOL80469688 01-Nov-2001 1,121.85 36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/011 01-Nov-2001 .1,064.98 PD 56.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,121.95 GNMA PGOL80469688 01-Nov-2001 1,121.85 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD I Ml/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -985.49 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Nov-2001 995.49 36209DHQD 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -935.45 PD 50.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -985.49 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Nov-2001 995.49 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Nov-2001 ORD PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40.23 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Nov-2001 4023 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 021011 01-Nov-2001 -38.19 PD 2.04 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Wprkbench- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000loo00 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SVMT.DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.23 GNMA POOL80499153 01-Nov-2001 40.23 3621000ES 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC I5-Nov-200I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .54.78 GNMA POOL 90497343 01-Nov-2001 54.78 36210NP45 6.000%12/152029 DD 12/011 01-Nov-2001 -52.00 PD 2.78 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54.78 GNMA POOL 80497343 01-Nov-200/ 54.78 362IONP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,174.13 GNMA PGOL804%461 01-Nov-2001 1,174.13 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -1.114.51 PD 59.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,174.13 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Nov-2001 1,174.13 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD0Mll 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,095.77 GNMA POOL 00496294 01-Nov-2001 3,095.77 36210MJSI 6.000%011152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -2,938.56 PD 157.21 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,095.77 GNMA POOL00496284 01-Nov-2001 3,095.77 36210M151 6.000%01/l52029 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC IS-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.34:55 Ex ftv Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,060.75 GNMA POOL80468330 01-Nov-2001 3,060.75 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -2,905.32 PD 155.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,060.75 GNMA POOL80468330 01-Nov-2001 3,060.75 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-No,2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,667.98 GNMA POOL 80491103 01-No,2001 3,667.98 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -3,481.72 PD 186.26 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,667.98 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Nov-2001 3,667.98 36210FRY4 6.000%0111 52 0 2 9 DO 01/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -358.28 GNMA POOLN0486720 01-Nov-2001 359.28 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -340.09 PD 19.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -358.28 GNMA POOLW0486720 01-Nov-2001 358.28 36210AVM6 6.000%1 2/1 52 0 2 8 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45.13 GNMA POOLR0483452 01-Nov-2001 45.13 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -42.94 PD 2.29 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45.13 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Nov-2001 45.13 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,868.53 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Nov-2001 6,868.53 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -6,519.74 PD 348.79 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,868.53 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Nov-2001 6,868.53 36210VF55 6.0000/e 03/152029 DO 03/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -359.37 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Nov-2001 359.37 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -341.12 PD 18.25 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -359.37 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Nov-2001 359.37 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .50.97 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Nov-2001 50.97 36207PTN9 6.000"/005/152028 DD 05/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -48.39 PD 2.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.97 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Nov-2001 50.97 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/0l/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -106.52 GNMA POOL#0457914 01-Nov-2001 106.52 36208QS93 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -101.11 PD 5.41 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -106.52 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Nov-2001 106.52 36208QSB3 6.000Yo 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63,210.95 GNMA POOLM0467286 01-Nov-2001 63,210.95 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -60,001.02 PD 3,209.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63,210.95 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Nov-2001 63,210.95 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81.00 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Nov-2001 81.00 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -76.89 PD 4.11 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81.00 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Nov-2001 81.00 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400.67 GNMA POOL®0465555 01-Nov-2001 1,400.67 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -1,32%54 PD 71.13 10-Deo2001 14:34:55 Em.five Wgrkbeuh - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE..- 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG0001000o 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCS&CONsowDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400.67 GNMA POOL80465555 01-Nov-2001 1,400,67 36209AE48 6.0009/.09/152028 DD 09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,264.73 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Nov-2001 1,264.73 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Nav-2001 -1,200.51 PD 64.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,26C73 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Nov-2001 1,264.73 36209AET3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -647,321.12 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Nov-2001 647,321.12 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -657,435.51 PD -10,114.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -647,321.12 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Nov-2001 647,321.12 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,452.38 FHLMC GROUP 404-0353 01-Nov-2001 13,452.38 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -13,792.99 PD -340.51 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,452.38 FHLMC GROUP 8G4-0353 01-Nov-2001 13,452.38 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATES COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,392.85 GNMA It POOL#0090023 01-Nov-2001 42,392.85 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DD 12101/9 01-Nov-2001 .43,094.99 PD -702.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,392.85 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Nov-2001 42,392.85 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/01/9 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.62 GNMA POOL 80500917 01-Nov-2001 33.62 36210SPAO 6,000%04/152029 DO 04/011 01-Nov-2001 -31.91 PD 1.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.62 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Nov-2001 33.62 36210SPAD 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,892.32 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS0 01-Nov-2001 2,892.32 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DD 022l/ 01-Nov-2001 -2,892.32 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIWCO -2,892.32 SBA GTD PARTN CTPS SBIC-PS 0 01-Nov-2001 2,892.32 831641DD4 6.640%02I02011 DD 0221/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,660.65 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Nov-2001 28,660.65 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DD 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -28,400.91 PD 259.74 10-Dec-1001 14:34:55 Eveculm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,660.65 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01-Nov-2001 28,660.65 36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -210,210.83 GNMA 11 POOL 8080408X 01-Nov-2001 210,210.83 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DO 05/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -208,075.88 PD 2,134.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -210,210.93 GNMA 11 POOL P080408X 01-Nov-2001 210,210.93 36225CN29 6.500%05/202030 DO 051011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,006.00 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Nov-2001 7,006.00 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2001 -6,835.23 PD 170.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,076.97 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Nov-2001 2,076.97 398108AE4 7,430%06/012003 DO 022910 01-Nov-2001 -2,046.63 PD 30.34 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,076.97 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Nov-2001 2,076.97 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 02/2910 01-Nov-2001 0.00 PC 26-Nov-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-P1MCO -53.936.76 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Nov-2001 53,936.76 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Nov-2001 -53,936.76 PD 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Execullve Woekbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRA l �� PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGO0010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 10 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,936.76 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Nov-2001 53,936.76 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Nov-2001 0.00 FC 16-Nov-2001 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 02-Nov-2001 99,461.67 313313NTI MAT 11/02/2001 02-Nov-2001 -99,461.67 MT 02-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Nov-2001 496,316.67 313385NY8 MAT 11/072001 07-Nov-2001 -496,316.67 MT 07-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 16-Nov-2001 99,315.64 313397PHS MAT H1162001 16-14ov-2001 -99,315.64 MT 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 MINNESOTA MNG&MFG DISC 26-Nov-2001 499,679.17 60406AYS4 11262001 26-Nov-2001 499,679.17 MT 26-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Nov-2001 1,495,900.00 63743CYV9 11292001 29-Nov-2001 -1,495,900.00 MT 29-Nov-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10-Dec-1001 14:34.55 Executive Wprkbeuh -, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILORS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NTS 01-Nov-2001 500,000.00 423328BD4 6.500%11/01/2001 DO 11/04/9 01-Nov-2001 -503.020.00 MT 01-Nov-2001 .3,020.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 07-Nov-2001 125,000.00 313400NV1 7.750%11/072001 DO 11/0719 07-Nov-2001 -127,208.75 MT 07-Nov-2001 -2,208.75 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO •1,800,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN MT 13-Nov-2001 1,800,000.00 86387SAM2 FLTG RT 1 111 3 20 01 DO I1/13/ 13-Nov-2001 -1,800,281.25 MT 13-Nov-2001 -281.25 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS I5-Nov-200i 100,000.00 3133MB1U2 7.125%11/152001 DO 05111/0 15-Nov-2001 -101,525.00 MT 15-Nov-2001 -1,525.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS 15-Nov-2001 1,000,000.00 893502BS2 6.375%11/152001 DO 11/1519 15-Nov-2001 -995,534.00 MT 15-Nov-2001 4,466.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BANK CONS BD 21-Nov-2001 40.000.00 313394XA1 6.155%11212001 DO 1121/9 21-Nov-2001 40,267.20 MT 21-Nov-2001 -267.20 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Nov-2001 400,000.00 3133M6R67 4.975%11232001 DO 1123/9 23-Nov-2001 -397,312.00 MT 23-Nov-2001 2,688.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 E*ecvtive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,847.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Nov-2001 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Nov-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,425.10 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Nov-2001 0.00 79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 30-Nov-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 112,240.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Nov-2001 0.00 9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-1,1ov-2001 0.00 SO 0.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 60,000.00 CHASE MAN14ATTAN CORP NEW SUB 01-Nov-2001 2,587.50 16161ABE7 8.625%05/01/2002 DO 05/01/9 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NTS 01-Nov-2001 16,250.00 423328804 6.500%I1/01/2001 DD 11/04/9 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 01-Nov-2001 63,000.00 020002AL5 7.875%05/01/2005 DO 0510110 01-1,10v-2001 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14.34:55 EvecuOve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 01-Nov-2001 79,225.42 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/012005 DD 042810 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 83,123.77 996085247 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2001 20,947.51 996085247 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 02-Nov-2001 538.33 313313NTI MAT 11/02/2001 02-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN#0061 05-Nov-2001 41,623.20 37042WESO FLTG RT 08/042003 DO 08/03/ 05-Nov-20O1 0.00 IT 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 642.20 WMP/IIUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 05-Nov-2001 6,030.80 302998GE3 7.500°A 12/012030 DO 10/21/9 01-Oct-2001 0.00 IT 05-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125.000.00 FED HOME LN MID CORP DEB 07-Nov-2001 4,843.75 31340ONVI 7.750%11/07/2001 DD 11107/9 07-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 07-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Deo-2001 14:34:55 &eculive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Nov-2001 3,683.33 313385NY8 MAT 11/07/2001 07-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 07-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Nov-2001 19,013.33 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/131 13-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 13-Nov-2001 545.00 3133M8RB2 5.450%05/102002 DO 05/10/9 10-N0v-2001 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN MT 13-Nov-2001 84,205.04 86387SAM2 FLTG RT 11/132001 DO 11/13/ 13-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 13-Nov-200I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 13-Nov-2001 18,985.55 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DO 05111/ 11-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,892.32 SBA GTD PARTN CFFS SBIC-PS 0 13-Nov-2001 50,209.31 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DO 0221/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,180,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO SUB NT 15-Nov2001 49,412.50 949740BV5 8.375%05/152002 DO 0526/9 15-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Deo-2001 14:34:55 &re wh a Wprkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL oCS(i000lo000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 15-Nov-2001 3,562.50 3133MB1U2 7.125%11/152001 DD 05/1110 15-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS I5-Nov-2001 31,875.OD 893502BS2 6.375%IU152001 DO 11/15/9 15-Nov-2001 O.OD IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS I5-Nov-2001 91,875.00 91281ODY I 09.750%05/152017 DO 05/151 I5-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 15-Nor-20D1 33.750.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 15-Nov-20D1 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Nov-2001 45,790.00 81240QGW6 6.540%02/20/2003 DD 02J20N 15-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PUACO 3,667.98 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Nov-2001 1,200.93 36210FRY4 6.000%0111512029 DO OMU 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT I5-Nov-2D01 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 13,452.38 FHLMC GROUP 804-0353 15-Nov-2001 3,607.51 3128DBMA2 7.5001/6101012004 DD 031011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 647,321.12 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 15-Nov-2001 28,177.06 3129DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,095.77 GNMA POOL 80496284 15-Nov-2001 86.59 36210M151 6.000Ye01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,174.13 GNMA POOL#0496461 15-Nov-2001 4,249.35 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/0l/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54.78 GNMA POOL 80497343 15-Nov-2001 212.30 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.23 GNMA POOL 80499153 15-Nov-2001 130.52 3621000ES 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33.62 GNMA POOL 80500917 15-Nov-2001 110.86 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,868.53 GNMA POOLN0503388 15-Nov-2001 4,375.48 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dee-2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench „ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rAce: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 359.37 GNMA POOL80506636 15-Nov-2001 344.73 3621 OYY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,862.50 FHLMC GROUP 678-6064 15-Nov-2001 1,130.17 31348SWZ3 6,384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Oct-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50.97 GNMA POOL80438057 15-Nov-2001 207.56 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 05/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 106.52 GNMA POOL 80457814 15-Nov-2001 387.59 36208QSB3 6.000o/10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-1,1av-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,264.73 GNMA POOL 80465546 15-Nov-2001 4,309.57 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400.67 GNMA POOLW0465555 15-Nov-2001 4,165.38 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 81.00 GNMA POOL 80467279 15-Nov-2001 267.10 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/1 5 20 2 9 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 Execbive Wmkbem6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,210.95 ONMA POOL#0467296 15-Nov-2001 3,773.02 36209CCX2 6.0001%10/15/2029 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,060.75 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Nov-2001 221.12 36209DIIF4 6.000%05/152029 DD 05/011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-No,2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 985.49 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-Nov-2001 3,956.69 36209DHQ0 6.000°/.08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-N0v-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,121.85 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-Nov-2001 223.54 36209EXRB 6.000°/.11/152028 DO I I/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45.13 GNMA POOL#0483452 15-Nov-2001 163.01 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 358.28 GNMA POOL#0486720 15-Nov-2001 111.77 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152029 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP#TR 00562 15-Nov-2001 36,393.36 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/142003 DO 02/14/ 15-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2001 0.00 10-De 2001 14:34:55 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-NO V-2001 -30-NO V-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPI,DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 16-Nov-2001 684.36 313397PHB MAT 11/161MI 16-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,936.76 GNMA OTT)REMIC TR 2000-9 FN 16-Nov-2001 4,739.81 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 16-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN If TR 00459 19-Nov-2001 9,047.50 073928VC4 FLTG RT 121012003 DO 08/17/ 19-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 19-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NIS 20-Nov-2001 36,556.07 370425QVS FLTG RT 081182003 DO 08/17/ 20-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,392.85 GNMA If POOL#0080023 20-Nov-2001 4,718.71 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/0119 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,451.22 GNMA D POOL M080088M 20-Nov-2001 5,866.41 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 0"11 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,660.65 GNMA II POOL#0080395 20-Nov-2001 3,661.84 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DD 04/01/ 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-2001 14:34:55 E "fiw Workbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 210,210.83 GNMA 11 POOL 0080408X 20-Nov-2001 30,961.58 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DD 051011 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BANK CONS BD 21-Nov-2001 1,231.00 313394XA1 6.155%1121/2001 DD 1120 21-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FTNL LLC MN 4TRO06 21-Nov-2001 3,875.52 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 041081 19-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,869.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 21-Nov-2001 11,427.65 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15.0n-2001 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS ADS 23-Nov-2001 9,950.00 3133M6R67 4,975%11/232001 DO 1123/9 23-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 23-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,250.49 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 23-Nov-2001 13,250.49 3133T17A4 6.000-A 11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 23-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 26-Nov-2001 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.50001.0925/2018 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 26-Nov-2001 0.00 10-Dec-200/ 14:34:35 Evecullve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2001 -30-NOV-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINRASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MINNESOTA MNG&MFG DISC 26-Nov-2001 320.83 60406AYS4 11262001 26-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 26-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,076.97 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA995 2&Nm-2001 7,941.03 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 0229/0 01-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 26-Nov-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Nov-2001 4,100.00 63743CYV9 11/291MI 29-Nov-2001 0.00 IT 29-Nov-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS TNT ADJ 30-NOV-2001 10.08 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-Now2001 0.00 CD 30-Now2001 0.00 10-Dec-1001 14:34:55 ExaM m Workbexh BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mmdn9Date Toed.or .Dir. 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 14 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES WITH CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FULLERTON GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement for payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charges with California State University at Fullerton, providing for payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in the total amount of$200,000 at the rate of$5,000 per quarter over a period of ten years, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District(District)first adopted an ordinance regulating the use of sewerage systems and requiring a Capital Facilities Connection Permit for connections to the District in 1954. • California State University at Fullerton (CSUF) built the first buildings on their campus in 1963. Those first buildings and all subsequent buildings were subject to the District 1954 ordinance. However, Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (formerly known as connection fees)were first enacted in 1969 and have gradually increased over time. • The District has traditionally collected its Capital Facilities Capacity Charges through agreements with the various cities, wherein the cities collect the District's fees at the time a building permit is issued. • CSUF is exempt from having to obtain building permits from the City of Fullerton. Therefore, no notification of intent to build nor notice of completion of CSUF's structures was given to the District. Consequently, no District Capital Facility Charges fees were collected. • District staff has met with CSUF staff and has obtained a list of all buildings on campus, their square footage and the year in which they were built. Staff has concluded that the total fees due to the District by CSUF amount to $200,000. CSUF is willing to pay these fees by budgeting and paying the District the amount of$5,000 per quarter for ten years. Otherwise, CSUF would exceed their local budget authority and risk that the Trustees of the California State University potentially disapprove the entire $200,000 expenditure. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No expenditure is being requested in the recommended action. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The agreement provides for California State University Fullerton (CSUF)to notify the District before any future buildings may be constructed and become occupied. That notification process includes listing the planned square footage of the proposed building and the projected date of occupancy. The District will estimate the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, provide that estimate to CSUF, and follow through with billing CSUF for the fees prior to occupancy of the building. ALTERNATIVES Collect the fees in one payment. CSUF has budgetary authority to pay$5,000 per quarter. An up front payment of$200,000 would require approval by the Board of Trustees of the California State University, which could be rejected by the Trustees. Therefore, Staff recommends payment over 10 years as agreed to by CSUF. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS N/A CW:jak:nc G:\wp.dta%agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda Reports\1201\Item 16.CSUF.dm w .' wool Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeebW D rosdldW- 12 9101 AGENDA REPORT 1tern N=W I nen Nun be ss Orange County Sanitation Distrid FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: EMERGENCY REPAIR OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, LINE A. CONTRACT NO. 5-57 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23,for Purchase Order No. 30761, issued to Mike Prich & Sons for Emergency Repair of Pack Coast Highway Force Main, Line A, Contract No. 5-57,for a total amount not to exceed $1,050.000; and, 2)Approve a change order to Purchase Order No. 30761 issued to Mike Prlich &Sons, Inc. for Emergency Repair of Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Line A, Contract No. 5-57, for an additional amount of $700,000, for a total amount not to exceed $1,750,000. SUMMARY Background • The 30/36-inch ductile iron force main, located between the Bitter Point Pump Station at Pacific Coast Highway and the Santa Ana River siphon at Plant No. 2, in the City of Newport Beach, failed on November 15, 2001 and flows were diverted into adjacent force mains. The initial estimated spill volume was 50,000 gallons. Most of the spill was contained onsite. However, a portion of the flow entered the storm sewer and approximately 1.25 miles of beach, in the area of the mouth of the Santa Ana River and the Newport Slough. The beach was closed by Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). • The failure occurred in the 30-inch portion of the force main. Initial field investigation revealed that the soffit(top of the inside of the pipe) is severely corroded and the pipe required replacement. • The initial amount is to replace the approximately 3,000 ft., 30-inch ductile iron portion of the force main.The amount is also to cover the continuing investigation of the two adjacent force mains and remaining upstream force main network of which the three force mains are a part. Replacement work, at the force main's isolation valve just north of the pump station, began immediately upon containment and cleanup of the spill and is proceeding north. • The additional amount is to re-line or remove and replace approximately 2,100 ft. of the 36-inch ductile iron portion of the force main. Recent investigation of the 36-inch pipe has shown that its polyethylene lining is failing and corrosion has penetrated the top of the pipe. • As part of the emergency action, Purchase Order No. 30761 was issued to Mike Pi lich & Sons, Inc. to accomplish the initial work to replace the corroded 30-inch pipe on a cost plus basis, for an amount not to exceed $1,050,000. A change order to this purchase order is to be issued to Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. to accomplish the remaining work for the 36-inch pipe on a cost plus basis, in an amount not to exceed $700,000. Mike Pi ich & Sons, Inc. is qualified to do the work, is under contract doing other related work in the area, and was available to respond quickly to the situation. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section 8.Page so) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Additional funds for staff costs during the final design and bid phases is being. transferred from the budget contingency. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Additional field investigation is underway for the other force mains in the immediate area. This area has always been subject to high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas which, naturally occurs in sewers. However, this Newport Beach coastal area has historically had more severe problems with this occurrence than other areas in the District sewerage system. ALTERNATIVES No viable alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption dated December 12, 2001. ATTACHMENTS None c.p auayMa:eoaa ngema aemnvro+edam nq.w aro>uxiv,em n.sn.aa Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mftbog Date TOBd.of Dir. 17J19,0, AGENDA REPORT nemrvumDe tt�16 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jeffrey D. Kidd, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: ORANGE—WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-25 (REBID) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for the Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid), on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (3) Receive and file request of lowest bidder Southern Califomia Underground Contractors, Inc. to withdraw bid; (4)Accept the request and allow the withdrawal of Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc.; and (5)Award a contract to Elser Constructors, Inc., for Orange-Westem Subtrunk Relief Sewer Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid), for an amount not to exceed $1,159,999. SUMMARY Background • The original bids for this project were opened on September 11, 2001. Six bids were received ranging from a high of$1,448,000, to the low bid of$879,000. The engineer's estimate was $900,000. On September 26, 2001 Board of Directors rejected all the bids due to a misinterpretation of a contract document provision requiring sand-cement slurry backfill in the trench zone. The Board authorized re-bidding the project. • The project was readvertised, and 16 bids were received on December 4, 2001. • Southern Califomia Underground Contractors, Inc., the apparent low bidder, requested to have its bid withdrawn due to a substantial error in their bid tabulation. • Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. has complied with the requirements of California Public Contracts Code Section 5103 relating to its proof of mistake. Staff recommends accepting the request of Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. and allowing its withdrawal, and award the contract to Elser Constructors, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $ 1,159,999. J PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The currently approved budget for FY2001/02 is: Project Budget $1,650,000 Construction Budget $1,250,000 Engineer's Estimate $1,250,000 Low Responsible Bid $1,159,999 High Bid $1,760,000 Number of Bids 16 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Page 19, Section a of FY2001102) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The design was funded and completed under Contract No. 3-25. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project was originally designed in 1990 by our Consultant NBS Lowry. The Consultant has since gone out of business. Therefore, the design plans have been updated using Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff to bring the plans up to current District and City of Buena Park (City) standards prior to construction. In addition, the geotechnical information has been updated, and traffic control plans have been prepared and approved by the City. The plans and specifications were completed in August 2001. This project provides a 21-inch relief by-pass sewer, diversion connections, and appurtenant inspection manholes to alleviate projected deficiencies in the Orange— Westem Subtrunk Sewer in Revenue Area 3. The deficiencies are the result of development of a water theme park and expanded hotel/resort facilities at Knott's Berry Farts. A portion of the flow in the Orange—Western Subtrunk Sewer will be diverted at Crescent Avenue, and flow west to the Knott Interceptor in Knott Avenue. The project will save several million dollars in cost avoidance by not having to upgrade the Orange—Western Subtrunk, a much longer sewer than this project sewer. Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc., has sent a letter to the District detailing a breakdown of its bid. The breakdown included an item for rock-sand and slurry backfill in the amount of$19,600. In reviewing its bid, it became apparent that this breakdown should have been $196,000, for a difference of$176,400. If the error had been caught prior to bid submittal, the resulting bid price would have been $1,139,700. District staff agrees that the low bidder appears to have made a significant error. Thus, there is sufficient cause and proof to allow Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. to withdrawal its bid. mow: W=+ Page 2 The following firms have submitted bids: Contractors Total Bid Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. $ 963,300 Elser Constructors, Inc. $ 1,159,999 Granich Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,187,985 Fleming Engineering Inc. $ 1,221,273 KEC Engineering $ 1,221,810 Paulus Engineering, Inc. $ 1,227,352 Miramontes Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,246,721 Vasilj Inc. dba Ivanko $ 1,376,850 Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. $ 1,388,523 Steve Bubalo Construction Co. $ 1,414,480 Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,432,447 Ken Thompson, Inc. $ 1,498,000 Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc.Nidmar Inc. a JV $ 1,506.128 Peter C. David Co., Inc. $ 1,587,694 Andrew Papac & Sons $ 1,636,426 Colich & Sons, L.P. $ 1,760,000 ALTERNATIVES No cost-effective alternatives have been identified. The no action alternative would eliminate the implementation of cost-effective collection system improvements, resulting in continued inefficiencies and potential surcharging. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report that was certified on July 19, 1989, and a Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. The Orange County Sanitation District has determined that supplemental environmental work will not be required for this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3. Letter from Contractor to withdraw bid, dated December 7, 2001. JK:jak:nc \Vead\dalat\wp.dte\agenda\Baard Agenda Repo \2001 1303rd Agenda Reports\1201Wem 16.3-25 Rebid.dw A,,,,,, „ 01 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ORANGE-WESTERN SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 3-25 (REBID) ORIGINAL 1 CURRENT. PROPOSED ;'PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTN%T,E �i PROJECTITASK 'AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET . � REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION: TOTAL EXPENDITURE ;EXPENDED, BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE , F' BUDGET TO DATE ' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%). Project Development $ 15,000 $ 15.000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 100% Studies/Pennittin $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ Design Staff $ 42,024 $ 115,000 $ 115.000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ 115000 100% Construction Contract $ 900,000 $ 900.000 $ 1,250.000 $ 1,159,999 $ 1,159,999 Construction Administration $ 81,613 $ 50,000 $ 50.000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Construction inspection $ 70,000 $ 70.000 $ 70000 $ 70,000 Contingency $ 90.000 $ 180.000 $ 150,000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 1.113,637 $ 1.330.000 $ - $ 1,650.000 $ 130,000 $ 1,279,999 $ 1.409,No $ 130,000 9% Reimbursable Costs PROJECTNET 1 $ 1,113,637 $ 1,330,000 1 $ - $ 1.650.000 $ 130.000 1 $ 1,279,999 $ 1.409,999 $ 130.000 1 97GA Q%FIIeNetWlFN3-2591T J51DIeebte December 7, 2001 BID TABULATION Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer Contract No. 3-25 (Rebid) Engineer's Estimate: $1,250,000 Construction Contract Budget: $1,250,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. 'Southern California Underground Contractors Inc. $ 963,300 2. Elser Constructors, Inc. $ 1,159.999 3. Granich Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,187,985 4. Fleming Engineering Inc. $ 1.221,273 5. KEC Engineering $ 1,221,810 6. Paulus Engineering, Inc. $ 1,227,352 7. Miramontes Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,246,721 8. Vasiq Inc. dba Ivanko $ 1,376,850 9. Mike Pdich & Sons, Inc. $ 1,388,523 10. Steve Bubalo Contruction Co. $ 1,414,480 11. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,432,447 12. Ken Thompson Inc. $ 1,498,000 "Requested to withdraw bid on December 7, 2001 C:)WlNNT1P1o6leaCWeyk3-25 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05119M OCSD • P.O.Bus 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 I December 7, 2001 Page 2 Engineer's Estimate: $1,250,000 Construction Contract Budget: $1.250,000 13. Vido Artukovich & Sons, Inc.Nidmar Inc. a JV $ 1,506,128 14. Peter C. David Co., Inc. $ 1,587,694 15. Andrew Papac & Sons $ 1,636,426 16. Colich & Sons, L.P. $ 1,760,000 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the lowest bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to ELSER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. in the bid amount of$ 1,159,999 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C:1wINN'RPm8les1oeoleyl3-25 Bid Tab.doo ReMaed 05119/88 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 . Feenlain valley,CA 9272&8127 • (714) 962-2411 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNDERGROUND CONTRACTORS, INC. Cal'donua limme#A-611356 Phone(310)639-2257 P.O.Box 1747 Fax(310)839.1668 Brea,CA 92822-1747 December 7,2001 sent via fax: (714)962-5018 sent via certified mail Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA Attention:'Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. Director of Engineering Reference: Orange-Western Subtrank Relief Sewer Contract No. 3-25 Dear Mr. Ludwin, Thank you for the opportunity to bid on the above referenced project After reviewing the figures used to arrive at a total amount, it has become apparent that our estimator inadvertently made a clerical error when adding up the numbers. Referring to Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. (SCU) bid sheet (attached), Line 6 should have read$196,000 and not$19,600 as detailed below. 1000 @ 13 =$13,000 4050 X 45 = $182,250 $13,000+ $182,250=$195,250 or$196,000 (and not$19,600) Therefor, unfortunately, this firm regretfully requests that our bid be withdrawn from this project and returned SCU apologizes for any inconveniences this may have caused. SCU appreciates the County's patience and understanding through the completion of this matter. In the event that you should have any questions,please feel free to call at your earliest convemen . you for your time, Z l , ) n id JJ:vlg Enclosure 11-+54 — "Sewer/Storm Drain" !/ ` Nam�i� CL�. '� Bltls/a Time i777 1 RCP FIRST SECOND 3 MANHOLES-PVC-WELDING-TEST�2hla,� UL/ ♦ STRUCTURESc- 5 ASPHALT I PCC STR.(INC.AMB) /F " /t 73 6 RGC' -SAND(A&B)Aomie�4. 15 s4a xvr 7 REMOVAL-STREET-MISC.STRUCT.-SAW - STRIPS- RAFFIC OURS ) 9 HAUL OFF&MISC.TRUCKING �� /��� 10 ENCASEMENTS-SUPPORT( DEWTR.1d7HJ tf 72, 11 MISS�C.RREyES�TORATION(FENCE&LAND) Cam`-"= V 12 `S1 -SI E TRAFFIC-SCHEDULE 13 SWEEPER--EQUIP.RENTAL { d /0 _ 14 FUEL-TIRES-OIL-PARTS-MISC.TOOLS 15 SHORE EQUIP.-JACKS-BEAMS-PLTS-TRANS 16 GRADING-CLEAR&GRUB CONS tT INSURANCE(FLOOD,RISK,R.R. 13 YARD-OFF.WC-MOB-&DEMOB-INSP.TRL. 19 BORE-JACK PIPE-TUNNEL(PITS IN&OUT) �- 20 LABOR(MIL,CIP,CLEAN UP COMPACT) G� elk o2 (0ygy a?Qy 21 WEEKS ON PROJECT&ADD.CON 22 Tod&MH SW+PIies 23 SUBTOTAL 1 ST: -2 2/aW 2710av 24 MISC.BIU I I EMS. / 2 25 SUBTOTAL2ND: I 26 OVERHEAOIPROF IBO TOTAL. ' e 9- 6- 0� l BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date T0113 or ". 2/19/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numbr v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT, JOB NO. J-71-7 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, for an amount not to exceed $1,163,500. SUMMARY • The Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, consists of the purchase and installation of 16-vapor scrubber monitoring units. • The purpose of this project is to optimize chemical usage in the odor scrubbers thereby reducing odors and odor complaints. • The plans and specifications for the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project were completed in October 2001. The plans and specifications were bid on November 13, 2001. Summary information on the budget and bids is as follows: Project Budget $2,732,000 Construction Budget $1,818,000 OCSD Equipment Prepurchase $ 620,575 (approved by Board of Directors on 09/28/01) Construction Budget without Equip $1,197,000 Engineer's Estimate $1,197,000 Low Responsible Bid $1,163,500 High Bid $1,571,500 Number of Bids 3 • The construction period is 4-1/2 months. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested for$1,163,500 in construction contract funds as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. r BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 2000/01 Budget, section 8-Page 104) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The scrubber emissions monitoring program began in 1996. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) solicited interested vendors to demonstrate a monitoring system that could continuously measure Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) scrubber emissions and control scrubber chemical additions. Vendor testing was conducted for six months. The Vapex system was the only monitor available that met all criteria for performance, accuracy, and reliability. O&M staff unanimously agreed to proceed with design and installation of temporary Vapex monitors. At the time, it was decided that 16 Vapex units were required for a large-scale test, including one spare. In FY1997/98, O&M budgeted a project to purchase and install the 16 Vapex units. O&M elected to manage the project and selected CH2M Hill, Inc. to perform the project design. O&M also elected to temporarily install the units during the design period. By the end of the fiscal year, O&M completed the temporary installations and the design for the permanent installation. In FY1998/99, the construction documents for the Vapex installations were turned over to the Engineering Department for implementation. The Engineering Department reviewed the construction documents, and put the project on hold after determining that the Plans and Specifications did not meet the soon to be released Engineering Design Guidelines. Also, during that review period, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) experienced a substantial number of odor complaints at Plant No. 2. Most of the complaints were the result of bleach carryover from the scrubbers. To resolve the odor issue, O&M investigated options to optimize the bleach chemical feed. In the first quarter of FY2000/01, O&M tested several chlorine residual monitors against the established criteria for performance, accuracy, and reliability. ATI and Vapex, Inc. units were purchased, and temporarily installed at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The Vapex, Inc. chlorine sensor was the only successful piece of equipment. Concurrently, information from the Odor Control Master Plan project, Job No. J-71-4, revised the proposed scrubber operational and control strategies to avoid off-site impacts. The revised operational strategy, and the Scope of Work for Job No. J-71-7, is to have Vapex Sentinel gas monitors installed on all 27 operational scrubbers. G%v dla�agenda%nard Agenda le,.aI001 Board Agenda aep \II0111l 17,712dx %..d. W.1 Page 2 Cost-Benefit Analysis The estimated financial benefit of this project includes reductions in Staff time and chemical costs. These are estimated at$377,000 per year. The estimated payback period for the $2,732,000 project is 7.2 years. Other project benefits include more accurate compliance with AQMD monitoring requirements, and a reduction in the number of odor complaints from surrounding neighbors. Conclusion The project as currently proposed has a payback of 7.2 years. The project will also allow the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)to implement automation goals, reduce chemical usage, reduce staffing effort, and reduce odor complaints. Thus, the project is favorable to the continued economical operation of OCSD's treatment facilities, and is recommended by Staff for implementation. ALTERNATIVES Reject all bids, cancel the project, and proceed with the long-tens odor control project, Job No. J-71-8. However, this project is an interim project to control scrubber emissions until the larger Job No. J-71-8 can rehabilitate the entire scrubber system. This would cause additional odor complaints by the neighbors over the next five years while Job No. J-71-8 is being designed and built. Staff does not recommend this alternative. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report, certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3. Bid Summary JB:jo:nc:jak G:�. �E�W A1100 BNNROaW ReNC11311Nnt]1]1-]M[ Page 3 November 13, 2001 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.:3 BID TABULATION Scrubber Monitor and Control Project Job No. J-71-7 Engineers Estimate: $1,197,000 Construction Contract Budget: $1,197,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Margate Construction, Inc.. $ 1,163 500 2. AES Construction Group $ 1,245,169 3. Shasta Electric LP $ 1,571,500 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering CARIeNelW IPU-71.7 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05119/98 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT JOB NO. J-71-7 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrYASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE! BUDGET TO DATE(') REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) DECREASE Project Development $ 51000 $ 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 100% jStudie.lPennnittirig 1 $ 101.000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 360.000 $ 360,000 $ 360.000 $ 359,951 $ 359.951 $ 266,300 74% Design Staff $ 34.000 $ 34,000 $ 34.000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 33.551 99% Construction Contract $ 1,468,000 $ 1,818,000 $ 1.618.000 $ 628.941 $ 1,163.500 $ 1,792.441 $ 81,421 5% Construction Administration $ 119.000 $ 119,000 $ 119.000 $ 119,000 $ 119.000 $ 23,500 20% Construction Inspection $ 41.000 $ 41.000 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ 41.000 $ 1.252 3% Contingency $ 254.000 $ 254,000 $ 254,000 $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 2.382.000 $ 2,732.000 $ - $ 2,732,000 $ 1,288,892 $ 1,163,500 $ 2,4" "1 $ 512,024 21% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ _ g g $ 0% PROJECT NET 1 $ 2,382,000 1 $ 2,732.000 1 $ - $ 2.732.000 1 $ 1,288,892 1 $ 1,163,500 1 $ 2.452,392 1 $ 512.024 21 (") Most of the funds authorized to date were done under Job No. SP-04. Job No. J-71-7 replaced SP-04. b'\wy.dta%ngUorms\bWgel table Form Revised W 4.2000 ' BID SUMMARY SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT JOB NO. J-71-7 Mar ale Construction Inc. AES Construction Grain, Shasta Electric LP W(+) Approx. Qty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Price Price Price Price Price $ 1,145,000.00 $ 1,145,000.00 $ 1,226,669.00 $ 1,226,669.00 $ 1,553,000.00 $ 1,553,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 1 6 $ 1,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 11000.00 $ 6.000.60 1 3 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 Lump Sum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,245,169.00 $ 1,571,500.00 ete (-) $ - I. fIt( ,$ . 1y183,5,Q0:l � $ 245,169.00 $ 1,571,500;0p Ma ate Construction Inc. AES Construction Group Shasta Electric LP 1-71-7 Bid Summary 2.xislSheel2 H:Wp.dWWngW0rms1BW DocsU-71-7 Bid Summery 2.xis 1 of 1 11/13/01 + BOARD OF DIRECTORS neemgoate rase aar. 17 19/at AGENDA REPORT ItemNumba 1 I an Number Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE 14'"STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-51 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Actions regarding approving the Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51: (a) Verbal report by Director of Engineering. (b) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-24, Making Certain Findings Relating To Less Than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the le Street Pump Station; Approving Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 14'Street Pump Station; Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. (2) Approve the purchase of real property located at 1514 West Balboa Blvd., Newport Beach, California from Karen Santaniello, Cynthia Peck, and Steven Peck at an amount not to exceed $405,000; and (3) Approve a budget amendment of$405,000 for Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total project budget of$2,616,000. SUMMARY • In April 2000, the Orange County Sanitation District (District)entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Lee & Ro, Inc. (Consultant)for the design of the Rehabilitation of the 141°Street Pump Station. The Consultant's preliminary report for the project recommended a new station. • 1514 West Balboa Blvd., a 2,936 square foot vacant property, approximately 650 feet west of the existing station, is suitable for the new station, and available for purchase from the owner. • An Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration addressing the environmental impacts and mitigation measures for constructing a new station on the vacant lot was prepared and mailed to public agencies and other entities known to have an interest in the project. - Page 1 - Recipients were invited to submit their comments on or before December 15, 2001. All comments were reviewed, and addressed. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was revised to address all concerns. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was also prepared that describes the actions that Orange County Sanitation District(District)will take to minimize environmental impacts of the project. • Staff and owner have reached an agreement for purchase of the property at the site, subject to the Board of Director's adoption of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of the final price ($400,000, plus miscellaneous title and escrow fees of approximately$5,000). • Staff recommends the approval of the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, purchase of real property (1514 West Balboa Blvd.), and a budget amendment of$405,000 for a total project budget of$2,616,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, needs to be increased by$405,000, from $ 2.211,000 to an amount not to exceed $2,616,000. The additional funds are to come from the District's Capital Improvement Reserves. The cost of real property was not included in the original budget. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2001-02, Section 8, Page 28: Capital Improvement Program,Collections Facilities, Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station,Contract No. 5-51) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Exislina Station The 14'"Street Pump Station Is an underground, 16-foot inside diameter reinforced concrete wet well/dry well facility. The station is located beneath the Balboa Blvd. median, immediately west of the 14'" Street intersection, opposite Newport Beach Elementary School. The entrance manhole to the wet well is located in the inside westbound lane of Balboa Blvd. The entrance to the dry well (electrical/control & pump rooms) is in the median. Reference Figures 2 and 3. The station has been upgraded twice since first built in 1948. The wet well was lined with a plastic liner in 1975 to protect the walls and ceiling from the corrosive environment. A variable speed drive was installed in 1992 on the lead pump to match the pump's discharge to the Flow entering the station. Page 2 New Station The new pump station to be located at 1514 West Balboa Blvd. is to consist principally of the following: • Below grade wet well/dry well structure, housing the pumps and Flow meter. • Above grade electrical/control structure. • On site, District parking for routine and major service. • Landscaping (building architecture,fence, plants, etc.) to meet with the area's overall atmosphere. • 800 feet of new gravity sewer. An Edison substation to the west, an alley to the north, an apartment residence to the east, and Balboa Blvd. to the south, border the new station site. See Figures 2 and 4. The existing station is to be removed to five feet below grade, and the remainder to be abandoned in place. The median is to be redone, possibly adding two parking spaces for the City of Newport Beach. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS An Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration indicate that there are only a few potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction of a new 14d' Street Pump Station. Mitigation measures have been proposed to minimize identified potential environmental impacts to an insignificant level. A summary of the mitigated measures is contained in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. The mitigation measures will be made part of the project specifications. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was also prepared to implement the mitigation measures. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Resolution No. OCSD 01-xx. 4. Figure 1, Project Regional Location 5. Figure 2, Project Block Location 6. Figure 3, Existing Station 7. Figure 4, Proposed Site WDC:jak G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda ReportM1201\Ilenn 18.&51.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE 14th STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-51 . . ........... pR0J I AU"IDPIZED- Pit -1; T, Project Development $ 17,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1.000 $ 1,000 $ 500 50% StudiesMemictling $ 18,000 $ 15,000 $ 15.000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 . $ 15.000 100% Consultant PSA $ 270,000 $ 250.000 $ 250.000 $ 242.7 $ 242.795 I $ 85,000 35% Design Staff $ 16,000 $ 27.000 $ 27.000 $ 27,000 $ 27.000 $ 22,000 81% Pumhase of Real Property $ - $ - $ 405.000 $ 405.000 $ - $ 405.000 $ 405,000 $ - 0% Construction Contract $ 1.217,000 $ 1.239,000 $ 1,239.000 $ - Constmetion Administration $ Construaon Inspection $ 128,000 $ 131,000 $ 131,000 1. $ Contingency $ 366.000 $ 368.000 $ 368.000 $ -IPROJECT TOTAL $ 2.210,000 $ 2.211,000 a 405.000 $ 2.616.000 $ 285.795 $ 405,000 $ 690,795 $ 122500 18% iReimbursable Costs I I I I I I I I 1PROJECT NET 1 $ 2,210.000 1 $ 2.211,000 1 $ 405.00111 1 $ 2,616.000 1: 1 $ 285.795 1 $ 405.0001 $ 690.795 1 $ 122.500 1 18% =auWy6-51 14M St PSPmpefty Purchaseq5-61 Bmgel Table(PmMny Purtl se)WelDisircs Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52 Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-61 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49 Total Project(s) Budget: $12,061,000 Consultant: Lee & Ro, Inc. Start Date of Project: 4/1/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Design of the rehabilitation/replacement of the following: "A" Street Pump Station $237,790 $237.790 3/22/00 Original PSA W Street Pump Station $242,795 $242,796 Rocky Point Pump Station $344,679 $344,679 Bitter Point Pump Station $324,537 $324,537 Total $1,149.801 $1.149,801 C1Cassidyl-51 14th St PSWmperty PurUasal5-51 PSA Status Report(Pmperty Purchase).doc 11/20/01 . ReviNd 0S/14/ea RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-24 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUMP STATION ORIGINALLY DESIGATED AS "REHABILITATION OF THE 14 STREET PUMP STATION": APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES: ADOPTING THE FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE 14' STREET PUMP STATION: AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT:AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUMP STATION ORIGINALLY DESIGNATED AS "REHABILITATION OF THE 14TN STREET PUMP STATION"; APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES; ADOPTING THE FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE 14TH STREET PUMP STATION; AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") is presently considering the adoption of the Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the W Street Pump Station ("Project"); and WHEREAS, District is the Lead Agency for the preparation and construction of environmental documents for the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, which is consistent with the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines, and District's CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, to assess the Rehabilitation of the 14" Street Pump Station's environmental impacts objectively, District prepared an Initial Study to assess the potentially-significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, if any, and alternatives associated with the Project; and, WSBS-#144556:No.3-12105101 1 WHEREAS, the Initial Study resulted in a determination that there were only less than significant impacts associated with the proposed Project if certain mitigation measures were implemented,therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared; and, WHEREAS, District has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, as required by CEQA; and, WHEREAS, District has objectively evaluated, received, and filed comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, either in full or in summary, together with the District's responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review, have been included in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, said Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been presented to the District's Board of Directors for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to,the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the 14n' Street Pump Station; and, WHEREAS, District has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, designed to ensure that the approved mitigation measures are implemented during Project construction and operation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,AND ORDER: Section 1: That changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed Project, before the proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review, which avoid or mitigate significant environmental effects to a point where dearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, all identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 2: That there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant impact on the environment. Section 3: That the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects District's independent judgment and analysis. WS&S-0144555:No.3-12/O5101 2 Section 4: The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the District's decision is based are located at the Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, 92708. The Custodian of these documents and other materials is the Director of Engineering, Attention of William Cassidy, Project Manager. Section 5: That the proposed Project consists of the construction of a new pump station, new force main, and extension of the existing upstream gravity sewer. The proposed Project also includes the decommissioning of the existing pump station. The proposed Project, without mitigation, could create a number of potentially significant environmental effects that have been identified in the Final-Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and have been taken into account in selecting the best methods for achieving Project objectives with minimal environmental impacts. Section 6: Potentially significant impacts identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration that will be mitigated to less than significant levels by District are as follows: A. The architectural design of the pump station is to integrate with the surrounding area, incorporating low water-use plants to prevent degradation of the existing visual character of the site or surrounding area. B. The station's exterior lighting is to be directed downward and oriented to ensure that no light source is directly visible from neighboring residential areas. Motion sensor lighting is to be used. C. Air emissions from equipment vehides will be mitigated by continued compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. Equipment will shut off when not in direct use and located as far as possible from residential areas. The constructor is to notify residences on West Balboa Boulevard and the Newport Beach Grammar School by posting notices of planned construction activities at least one (1)week in advance. D. That a Traffic Control Plan will be developed and included as part of the District's Standard Plans and Specifications. Emergency vehicle access will be provided, via a locked gate accessible to all emergency service agencies. Automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the area will be temporarily prohibited to protect public safety and facilitate a more rapid completion of the Project via fencing and detour signs. E. Disturbance of cultural or paleontological resources during construction will be mitigated by halting work if unusual materials are found, and then consulting with qualified professionals to examine the materials, record findings, and properly curate any significant artifacts discovered. W686-#144556:M.3-12105/01 3 . F. Construction staging areas shall be designed to contain contaminants such as oil, grease, and fuel products so that they do not drain towards receiving waters or stone drain inlets. Overnight drip pans are to be placed beneath heavy-duty construction equipment. G. Temporary construction noise will be mitigated by limiting construction hours and informing the neighbors of construction activities. H. Disruption of roadways and parking during construction will be mitigated through preparation of traffic control plans that maintain maximum safe traffic access. The Newport Beach Grammar School and nearby Churches are to be notified at least one (1)week in advance of any lane closures. The Contractor is to provide for a crossing guard and traffic police at the intersection of Balboa Boulevard and 14t° Street to ensure the safety of the Elementary School children arriving and departing from school. Section 7: That the Board of Directors adopts the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 8: That the Board of Directors approves the mitigation measures, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Section 9: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the Districts CEQA Procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 19, 2001. CHAIR ATTEST: BOARD SECRETARY WS&5-#144556:No.3-12105101 4 REHABILITATION OF THE 14" STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-51 yPark Av Dana Point Harbor Proiect Location 1514 W Balboa Blvd Newport Beach, CA. 92661 141h Street Pump Station FIGURE 1 REHABILITATION OF THE 141h STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-51 ' -�-- 4,14 'm . mmmm � 1 14TH STREET PUMP STATION _L ...... m mmmmmmmmmmm m 1514 mums smm 1 -� --= WEST BAL BALBOA BLVD. I FIGURE 2 REHABILITATION OF THE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. school— Newport Beach Grammar r . View to East along Median of Balboa Boulevard FIGURE 3 I .. Approximate Outline of Existing 14"' street— Pump Station Balboa Boulevard (Westbound) REHABILITATION OF THE 141h STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-51 1514 West Balboa Blvd f r VF 6 Y View to North across Balboa Blvd FIGURE 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeeBng Date Tn8d.WDir. 2/19101 AGENDA REPORT Item tum1umOer 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to modify the certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report: (1) Receive and file Addendum No. 2 for the Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84; (2) Receive and file Addendum No. 3 for the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; (3) Receive and file Addendum No. 4 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22; and (4) Receive and file a Notice of Exemption for the Area Classification Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2. SUMMARY • Since adoption of the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), a number of treatment and collection system projects have been designed, and/or are currently under design that were not previously identified in the certified Final PEIR. • Four projects have been identified that need subsequent documentation according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These projects are the Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84; the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-24; the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22; and the Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2. • Pursuant to CEQA, an Addendum is the appropriate document to describe the minor modifications to the proposed projects. According to CEQA, no public circulation or review period is required for an Addendum prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final EIR. The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1999 Strategic Page 1 Plan PEIR was previously circulated for a 45-day public review period; June 29, I 1999 through August 16, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No budgetary action is being requested at this time. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Miscellaneous& Support Projects, Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan,Section 8-Page 171) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No budgetary action is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • To address the projects described herein, Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has prepared three Addenda to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)and one Notice of Exemption (NOE) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The Addenda and NOE are as follows: - Addendum No. 2 for the Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.84: The Addendum has been prepared to address minor modifications to the original landscape plan for the southwestern portion of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)Treatment Plant No. 2, located just north of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in the City of Huntington Beach. As the result of several meetings with District staff, the City of Huntington Beach, and the California Department of Fish and Game, the plan was revised to increase the aesthetic appearance of visual screens to further shield the treatment plant from PCH and enhance wildlife habit in the coastal marshes. The construction activities associated with the revised landscape plans are similar to those previously described in the PEIR. No new significant environmental effects have been identified that would require major revisions or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts or mitigation measures adopted by the District's 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. Addendum No. 3 for the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4: The Addendum has been prepared to address minor changes to the pipeline alignment, including abandoning the existing line in place, trenching and construction methods, and addressing jurisdictional issues, i.e., crossing of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel, located on Bushard, adjacent to the Southern California Edison easement, north of Yorktown Avenue. The Addendum will also clarify traffic impacts as the result of full street closures wN..a:WWI Page 2 necessary to implement the project. The modifications do not require adoption of additional mitigation measures that were not already included within the PEIR, nor does it change the conclusion of the PEIR regarding the significance of environmental impacts. The District will conduct informational meetings for the affected neighborhoods, including the Southeast Huntington Beach Association, and cities as needed to discuss the traffic control impacts and implementation of updated mitigation measures without going through an additional CEQA process. Addendum No. 4 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22: The Addendum has been prepared to address minor modifications to the original Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project assessed in the PEIR. The project located in the City of Huntington Beach was intended to rehabilitate or install a parallel sewer to increase hydraulic capacity. Since adoption of the PEIR, anticipated development for the area has decreased. Therefore, the pipeline will not be installed to increase capacity, but only to improve the conditions of the existing deteriorating pipeline. The 21-inch diameter sewer on Warner Avenue, from Springdale Street to Graham, will be abandoned and replaced with the same size pipe. The project limits will also be extended beyond that described in the PEIR. Approximately 7500 linear feet of additional pipeline will be abandoned and replaced on Warner Avenue,from Graham Street to Algonquin Street and Bolsa Chica Street, from Warner Avenue to Los Patos. The existing 21-inch pipe segment on Los Patos, from Boise Chica Street to Marina View Place will be rehabilitated as stated in the PEIR. The construction activities associated with the project modifications would be similar to those described in the PEIR. No new significant environmental effects or information of substantial importance has been identified with the project modifications that would require a major revision, or substantially increase the severity of the previously identified impacts or affect mitigation measures adopted in the District's 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. NOE for the Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. P2-35-2: This project was not considered as part of the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). This project has been determined to be a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301, Existing Facilities. The project requires that the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) relocate existing facilities within the treatment plants to reduce potential fire and explosion hazards, and establish compliance with current National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 820 standards. Since the project is being conducted to "meet current standards of public health and safety"the purpose and need for the project clearly meets the intent of the Class I Categorical Exemption for safety upgrades. A Memorandum has been prepared, and included with the Notice of Exemption (NOE)to briefly describe the project and the District's rationale for issuing the NOE. ,;a„", Page 3 ALTERNATIVES None. In the event, the Addenda and NOE for these projects are not filed in the Districts office prior to the beginning of construction and/or bidding, the District would be considered in violation of CEQA. CEQA FINDINGS The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR was certified by the District Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. Addendum No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR and the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR) System Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement(EIR/EIS) was filed with the State Clearinghouse on March 28, 2001. Addenda Nos. 2, 3 and 4 as described herein, will be retained in the District's official files for internal reference. The NOE for the Area Classification Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 was filed with the County of Orange on November 30, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Addendum No. 2, Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2 2. Addendum No. 3, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 3. Addendum No. 4, WamerAvenue Relief Sewer 4. Notice of Exemption, Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2 AA:jak:nc:jo G:\ xta+agenda\Boad Agenda Repode\2001 Board!Agenda ReWre\1201\Ifem 19.EIRJ40-5.dm Page 4 Addendum #2 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO,2, JOB NO. P2-84 Orange County Sanitation District 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report November 2001 4U1 Wilzhim Houlcrmd 225 Hush Stmer 1000 Broadway MO Uni.ky Avtnuc 2635 Umenon Rd. �/F Innd. mml Suite 480 Suitt im Suitc410 Saim 130 #102 �`�\/Ap Ins Mgcles, San Francisco, Oaidand, Sacnnwnro. Clcmwattt, � �- Califomia Califomia Califomia Mfomia Florida MIO-3512 94104 941A7 95825 33762 (323)933fiill (415)8%-5900 (510)839-5066 (916)5644500 ( 27)5/24226 zonae AAdenda p2 r INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Section 15164 as Addendum No.2 to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)for the Orange County Sanitation District(District) 1999 Strategic Plan to address minor modifications in the proposed landscaping plan for the District's Treatment Plant No.2. The PEIR assessed potential impacts of the Strategic Plan through the year 2020,including collection system improvements,treatment system upgrades,and disposal capacity improvements. The District certified the PEIR in October 1999. The 1999 Strategic Plan provides a framework for developing landscape designs for District facilities. Since the certification of the PEIK landscape plans have been finalized for the southwestem portion of Treatment Plant No.2,located just north of Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Huntington Beach. The finalized plans provide visual screening of the treatment plant while enhancing natural habitat values in the surrounding area. This Addendum describes the proposed landscape plans and assesses whether they would pose environmental impacts that were not already addressed in the PEIR. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR identifies the District's capital improvement projects proposed to meet future demand for wastewater collection,treatment and disposal facilities through 2020. Projects are proposed to replace and rehabilitate sewer collection systems,expand and upgrade the District's two wastewater treatment plants,provide adequate discharge capacity for projected peak flows,provide additional treated wastewater to the Orange County Water District for expanded water reuse,and study the feasibility of other improvements. The objectives of the 1999 Strategic Plan are: 1) To plan for the wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal facilities to serve the needs of the District's service area through 2020. 2) To insure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharge permit conditions, including the requirements of the 301(h)modified(secondary treatment waiver)National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit. 3) To recommend projects that meet the communities needs,protect public health,are technically feasible,and are cost effective and environmentally responsible;and 4) To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling. The Urban Design Element of the 1999 Strategic Plan(Volume 9)identified areas within and surrounding Treatment Plant No.2 that would undergo landscaping to provide a visual screen 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR I Environmental Science Associates Addendem#2 from adjacent land uses including residential and recreational areas. The PEIR states on page 3-30 that landscape plans would be developed consistent with the Urban Design Element to minimize impacts to environmental resources. The PEIR includes the landscaping projects in the overall construction activities associated with the plant expansions. Impacts to environmental resources resulting from these construction activities are evaluated throughout the PEIR. The PEIR acknowledges on pages 6.1-5 and 6.1-11 that the perimeter landscaping would be finalized to address the sensitivities of surrounding land uses including residential areas and the wetland habitat within the adjacent Talbert Marsh. Impact 6.1-3 of the PEIR identifies that the District's facilities could adversely impact the visual character of the local area. The impact discussion describes the Urban Design Element and identifies the areas proposed for landscaping including the southwestern comer of Treatment Plant No.2. The PEIR recognizes the need for further detailed designs in the southwestem comer of Treatment Plant No.2 in order to reduce visual impacts to the City of Huntington Beach. Mitigation Measure 6.1-3a requires that the District implement the Urban Design Element to avoid visual impacts. Since the certification of the PEIR,the landscape plan for the southwestern perimeter of Treatment Plant No.2 has been finalized after considerable consultation with the City of Huntington Beach and the California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG). The finalized plans provide visual screening of the trwtment plant while enhancing natural habitat values in the surrounding area as described below. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Treatment Plant No.2 is located in Orange County in the City of Huntington Beach(Figure 1). The plant site is approximately 110 acres,bounded on the southeast by the Santa Ana River and Brookhursi Street to the west. Directly south of the plant site is the 40400t wide Orange County Flood Control Channel(fabler Marsh)that haz recently been restored by the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy and the District. A California lest tern nesting site is located just southwest of the treatment plan on the beach. Pacific Coast Highway separates the Talben Marsh from Huntington Beach State Park. Currently,the landscape area in the southwest comer of Treatment Plan No.2 acts as a buffer zone between the open spaces of Talbert Marsh and the Plant. The dimensions of the area are approximately 800 feet in length and approximately 40 feet wide from the Talbert Marsh waterline to the farm This buffer zone is maintained as an ornamental lawn area with nine 30-foot palm trees and eucalyptus tree stands to screen the treatment facilities from view. A public bike path borders Talbert Marsh between the marsh and the facility. The landscape plans for the southwestern comer of Treatment Plant No.2 described in the Urban Design Element and analyzed in the PEIR called for retaining the existing palm trees and eucalyptus trees on site and installing a"greenscreen"perimeter fence to provide a visual screen 1999 Strategic,Plan Program EM 2 Environmental Science Associates r C CITY OF C CRY OF , X BDNN�+M*a+ C p C=A i 4 Talbert Nacre e 4 Pre rvB � • fi i �I I Ai 46/i I /yr TA / pyi ThC�g _ IC x* I .ON Fomror - 0009 00 at PROJECT SITE q�, I R" 11116. ao eQ Ak h a°m00 of Pacific Ocean BO4S Yeq . Ne.R ; x V4 t x r'ti I * x x �F Y ♦`I PROJECT SITE f✓w NEWPORE WL W BFACX legeM: I.ellle QPe6iEen141 Pre9 a i soma o•••• w k laeXTem XeEnas Arm IDL Wg4ma a ID Mile —____.. -__—pCSD.Gwcek Plm Pmg/mn E(R Addmdum R/?01)bB SIXAMiF sam:-,W-- -- Figure l Site Location Addendum#2 from the Pacific Coast Highway. (Greenscreen is a heavy gage,wire mesh fence,that encourages climbing vegetative cover to grow over it.) After several meetings with the District,City of Huntington Beach representatives,and CDFG biologists,these plans have been revised. Figure 2 shows the revised landscape plan. The central portion of the landscaped area and the area between the polymer building and the secondary clarifiers will have a 12-foot high,green vinyl-coated chainlink fence that will have native vines growing on it for screening and security purposes. Several earthen mounds approximately I 1-feet high will also be installed to provide topographic variety. The earth mounds will be strengthened by a soil retention system to reduce erosion and sloughing. The soil retention systems will utilize segmented concrete blocks and compacted soil to produce a soil- reinforced retaining wall. This system(called the Vedura system)also incorporates horizontally and vertically undulating mounds within the landscape that inctnse the aesthetic appearance of the retaining wall. This system will be utilized to stabilize the mounds as well as provide an area to plant vegetation increasing the aesthetic appearance of the retaining wall and enhancing wildlife habitat. The landscaping will utilize native vegetation appropriate to a coastal area. To provide further visual screening,2-foot 6-inch concrete retaining walls will be placed in front of the berm planting areas. Additionally an eight-foot high concrete wall will be placed in front of the maintenance facility and several 6.5-foot concrete screen walls of varying lengths will be placed in front of the native shrubs and trees between the two berated areas. As part of the revised landscape plan,the nine existing palm trees on the west side of the site will be removed to eliminate raptor perches. The CDFG expressed interest in removing the existing palm trees to eliminate perches for birds of prey near the coastal marshes. This would provide additional protection for special status bird species that utilize the marsh. Eucalyptus trees on site will be retained to shield the treatment plant from view. Larger plant material throughout the site will be no more that 12 feet high pursuant to the concerns of the CDFG. The revised landscape plans have been approved in concept by the City of Huntington Beach representatives and by CDFG. Appendix A of this document contains a letter from CDFG acknowledging conceptual approval. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT MODIFICATIONS Potential impacts to environmental resources are evaluated further in this section. None of the proposed modifications would have a"potentially significant"environmental impact or would alter the conclusions of the PEIR 1999 Strategic Plan Program Erg 4 Envuonmenul Science Associates o e a Mew. Flyun3 R ,nd Inntlscope M. Addendum g2 AESTHETICS No Impact. The proposed project was initiated to screen the treatment facilities work from the community. This is a beneficial impact of the project. The 1999 PEIR identified the need for landscaping to mitigate visual impacts of the treatment plant(PEIR Mitigation Measure 6.1.3a). The revised landscape plan would enhance visual resources. No negative impacts to aesthetics are anticipated by the implementation of the project. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES No Impact. The project is not located on agricultural land and therefore,the modification to Treatment Plant No.2 will have no effects on agricultural resources in the area. AIR QUALITY No Impact. Installation of the landscaping would require the use of heavy-duty construction equipment such as backloaders to create the berms and prepare the soil for planing. The 1999 EIR identified this landscaping project and assessed overall impacts of air emissions associated with construction activity. The revised landscaping plan would employ construction methods assumptions that have not been substantially modified from those identified in the 1999 EIX Given the scale of the project and short-tern nature of construction activities,no impacts to air quality would be anticipated(PEIR Mitigation Measure 6.5-1). BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES No Impact.The proposed modifications have been approved in�concept by CDFG. The existing palm trees will be removed to reduce use by raptors as perches and nesting sites as described in Mitigation Measure 6.3-1 of the PEM. Attachment A of this Addendum provides the conceptual approval letter prepared by CDFG for the project. The revised project would enhance habitat value in the area. The PEIR indicates that no impacts to biological resources would be anticipated as a result of the treatment plant expansions,since no undisturbed land would be affected. The revised landscaped plan would not change this conclusion. No impacts in biological resources are anticipated. CULTURAL RESOURCES No Impact. The area to be landscaped has been substantially disturbed. No buildings will be demolished as part of the project. No additional impacts to cultural resources would occur due to the landscaping redesign at Treatment Plant 2. 19"Strategic Plan Pmgmm EIR 6 Environmental Science Amciates Addendum#2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS No Impact. The landscape area has been extensively modified in the past by human activity. Potential impacts of construction activities including erosion were addressed in the PEIR(PEIR Mitigation Measure 6.6-1 a). The landscaping would not alter the analysis in the PEIR. No impacts would be anticipated. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Impact. The PEIR assesses the use of hazardous materials during construction. Implementation of the proposed landscaping plan would not pose additional impacts. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY No Impact.Constmction of the landscaping will comply with construction Best Management Practices and Mitigation Measures identified in the PEIR to reduce erosion(PEIR Mitigation Measure 6.7-1 a through 6.7.1 e). No new impacts are anticipated. LAND USE PLANNING No Impact. The PEIR identified the need for landscaping on the southern edge of Treatment Plant No.2 to enhance the visual screen of the plant site(PEIR Mitigation Measure 6.1-3a). The revised landscape plan would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. No effects on land use are anticipated. MINERAL RESOURCES No Impact. All modifications will be to previously disturbed land. No impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. NOISE No Impact. The PEIR assessed potential noise impacts of construction activities at Treatment Plant No. 2(PEIR Mitigation Measures 6.4-la,6.4-le,and 6.4-1g). The nearest residences are located in Huntington Beach. The local community has expressed support for the project. No additional noise impacts are anticipated from the constmction of landscaping. POPULATION AND HOUSING No Impact. All modifications to landscaping plans will occur within the Treatment Plant No.2 boundaries and therefore,will not impact population or housing in the area. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 7 Environmental Science Associates Addendum e2 PUBLIC SERVICES No Impact. The landscaping of the site will not impact police,fire and sewer services. RECREATION No Impact. The bike trail along the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh will not be altered. The revised landscape plan would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. Recreation will not be affected by the proposed landscaping. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC No Impact. The PEIR addressed impacts to traffic from construction activities on the treatment plant property. The revised landscape plan would not alter the conclusions of the PEER. No impacts to traffic or transportation are anticipated by the project. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS No Impact. The project modifications arc not expected to impact utilities and service systems. CEQA COMPLIANCE The proposed landscaping modification to Treatment Plant No.2 would not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. The CEQA Guidelines,Section 15164, indicates that an Addendum is the appropriate document to describe minor modifications to the proposed project for which a Final EIR has hem certified. An Addendum may be prepared if the modifications do not pose additional significant impacts. A Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be required if the project modifications required major revisions to the PEIR or new information of substantial importance that was not available at the time of preparation became available. As substantiated in this Addendum,the proposed landscaping modification to Treatment Plant No.2 would not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. Section 15164(e)of the CEQA Guidelines requires an Addendum to include an explanation as to why a subsequent EIR is not necessary. The modifications to the Orange County Sanitation Districts Treatment Plant No.2 landscape plan are not substantial enough to require the preparation of a Subsequent EIR. The PEIR project description(page 3-30)identified the need for landscaping around the perimeter of the treatment plants and described the construction activities required to implement the revised landscape design. The landscape plan has been revised to accommodate the concerns of the local community and of CDFG. The construction activities and level of effort would be similar to those described in the PEIR. No new significant environmental effects have been identified that would require major revision or 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 8 Environmental Science Associates Addendum MI substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. No new information of substantial importance has been identified that would add new significant impacts or increase the severity of previously identified impacts. None of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR have been rejected by the project proponent. Lastly,the modifications would not affect mitigation measures adopted for the District's 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. According to CEQA Section 15164(c),no public circulation or review period is required for an Addendum prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final EIR. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 9 Erwimnmentel Science Associates Addendum W2 REFRENCES Orange County Sanitation District,1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, lone 1999. Orange County Sanitation District,Strategic Plan Urban Design Element(Vol.9). 1999. Orange County Sanitation District,Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2,April 13,2001. 1999 Strategic Pin Program EM 10 Environmenml Science Associates ATTACHMENT A Conceptual Approval Letter From The California Department of Fish and Game VAa a-C alrOWaMTE 29f_ARM_ riaAY QgV6 Gurrgr DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME sow,Coast r+oo+ 49"Sm AwAo",C.a Aw,w aM O407 OI1 9alA �l aassaot FW((B6a1 4674739 June 29,2001 Mr.Sames Haberg Fagmemi g Supervisor Canty Sanitation Districts of 0-09C County 10W Fors Averme Founlam Valley,California 92708-7018 FAX(714)962-5018 Des W.Herber This lever is a follow-up m our mating moral weeks ago at the Sanitation District ollims moceaiug your nut reeem proposals for landscape improveamas at Plant No.2 is Htmtington 13eaaeh The Dgmctvmast has reviewed the"Lmdswpe and Irrigation Plan for the Dtaoge County Satdtatmn District Plant No. 2-dated Aprf 13,2001 (Plan). The Plan proposes to remove the Mmaom Sn paMa on the west side of the star and retain the ebdstmg eucalypts rats. Arms ro be plemed would consist oftwetve- bot tag"Greenspan"and a series oftttotmds and walls. Three possible design schmtahave been developed,a0 of which would inchde the use of aative piau harbumk oystc I to reach no more than twelve feel in height All=rancid review of the seheones,we fsel that any of them would be apprupnue for the site- Department staff her discvscd the Plies plant palette with the landscape schitect and has mggYed» to the comporcat specie min. Wrth the rcwoval of a few msila species with the potential to escape from the ate,and the addition of some locally adapted spear.rbe proposed>✓,dscpb18 should provide ef6cd a screening and increase the habitat values of the area without attracting uvwa6ed predator. We appreciate the chalimp you have been facing and now commend the creativity ofthe desigo(s)you haw developed and the&=My of the native plant spores that will wfbm the view of Plant No.2 that has been yomr ceaeern. If you have father questions rcgsrdmg tba projwx please fin Sae to contact the,at the kmdmd ads and telephone tnvnbcr,or ota s iffprmmy pout-of-eoamct,Mr.Brad Hende soA at(310)214-9950. Sincerely. £ �qa r"�C f. Raysbtook Rrgioml Manager cc: Sin non pure Addendum #3 BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO. 1-2-4 Orange County Sanitation District 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report November 2001 4221 W ilshisn Boulevard 225 Bush Ss 1000 Broadway 700 Unm city Aa 2695 Ulmeron M 4rvna—scud Suitt aed WM 1700 Suim410 Suns 130 0102 ESA Saenw Los A g lm San Fsmseifnu. Odbnd. Sao*namo cl a aauo. Va°d°l- Califomia Califomia Califomu CallfMia Florida 900IOd512 94w 94607 95925 33762 (323)9336111 (415)996-59M (510)339-5066 1916)56"M (727)572-5226 Addendum a3 INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Section 15164 as Addendum No.3 to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)for the Orange County Sanitation District(District) 1999 Strategic Plan.The purpose of the Addendum is to address changes in the proposed construction methods for the Bushard Street Trunk Sewer Improvements,a Capital Improvement Project(CIP)for the District's Collection System.The PEIR assessed potential impacts of the Strategic Plan through the year 2020, including collection system improvements,treatment system upgrades,and disposal capacity improvements. The District certified the PEIR in October 1999. The 1999 Strategic Plan outlined collection system improvements for the District's 12 sewer trunks.Since the certification of the PM a Preliminary Design Report(PDR)for the Bushard Truk Sewer was prepared to discuss the need for the project as well as review project alternatives and recommendations resulting from project design developments.Preliminary project- engineering studies have determined thatjacking and boring construction method would not be utilized.Instead,the sewer will be installed using the open trench method.This Addendum describes the modifications to the proposed construction methods and assesses whether they would pose additional enviromnental impacts or require mitigation measures that were not already addressed in the PEIR. CEQA COMPLIANCE The proposed construction method modification to the Bushard Street Sewer improvement project does not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15164,indicates that an Addendum is the appropriate document to describe minor modifications to the proposed project for which a Final EIR has been certified. An Addendum may be prepared if the modifications do not pose additional significant impacts. Section 15164(e)of the CEQA Guidelines requires an Addendum to include an explanation as to why a subsequent EIR is not necessary. A Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be required if the project modifications required major revisions to the PER or new information of substantial importance that was not available at the time of preparation became available. As substantiated in this Addendum,the proposed construction modifications for the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project would not result in major revisions in the project description as analyzed in the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. This Addendum describes the project modifications and assesses the potential for significant impacts.The project modifications would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. According to CEQA Section 15164(c),no public circulation or review period is required for an Addendum prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final EIR. 1999 Strategic Plan Program ErR I Environmental Science Associates Addendum a3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR identifies the District's Capital Improvement Projects proposed to meet future demand for wastewater collection,treatment and disposal facilities through 2020. Projects are proposed to replace and rehabilitate collection sewer systems,expand and upgrade the Districts two wastewater treatment plants,provide adequate discharge capacity for projected peak flows,provide additional treated wastewater to the Orange County Water District for expanded water reuse,and study the feasibility of other improvements. The objectives of the 1999 Strategic Plan are as follows: 1) To plan for the wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal facilities to serve the needs of the District's service area through 2020. 2) To insure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharge permit conditions, including the requirements of the 301(h)modified(secondary treatment waiver)National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit. 3) To recommend projects that meet the communities needs,protect public health,are technically feasible,and are cost effective and environmentally responsible;and 4) To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 1999 Strategic Plan outlines the need to improve nine out of the twelve trunk sewers within the District's 400 miles of existing sewer lines to address capacity deficiencies by the year 2020. The collection system improvement projects include sewer rehabilitation and replacement pmjmts.The Bushard Street Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project is included within these projects. The Bushard Street Trunk Sewer conveys wastewater from Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach to the District's Treatment Plant 2.The Bushard Trunk is also a main transmission pipeline the services the cities of Fountain Valley,Westminster,Garden Grove,Stanton,Fullerton,and Bum Park Figure 1 shows the alignment of the proposed pipeline replacement project. As described in the PEflt,the District is proposing to replace the Bmhard Trunk Sewer to remove deteriorated pipeline and provide more capacity.The sewer line proposed for replacement extends from the intersection of Ellis Avenue at Bushard Street in Fountain Valley and down 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 2 Environmental Science Associates ■ FOUNTAIN V C:Aw / _ I . .I.' ZGWIELD IAV - RECLAMATION 6t- PLANT No. 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FLOOD CONTROL YGRIQOWN AV CHANNEL CROSSING COSTA MESA r. AGAMS AV HUNTI GTON BEACH S r o - N m INOIANAPOLIS,AV - o BUSHARD STREET TRUNK SEWER f° REPLACEMENT ALIGNMENT ATIANfA AV _ -__. ligmm N AV Pnupc oc.., BANNING AV TREATMENT PLANT No. 2 COSTA MESA I NEWPORT - BEACH NoM SOURCE'OCSO,ncnu Ums M P -OCSOSrc'egic P/onProgruln E/R.11denMm/:O1I68 Figure I Bushud Street Trunk Replacement Alignment Addendum#J Bushard Street for approximately four miles to Banning Avenue terminating at Treatment Plant 2 on Brookhurst Street in the City of Huntington Beach. The PEIR(Section 3 and 7)identified and analyzed the potential impacts associated with the collection system improvement projects,including the Busha dl Trunk Sewer. The PEIR discussed the construction activities associated with open trench andjack and bore construction methods and identified mitigation measures to minimize the short-term impacts associated with the replacement of the sewer.The PEIR details the need to schedule and plan construction activities in a=met that would create the least amount of traffic disturbance since the construction activities would be within road rightsof-way. The construction modifications associated with the project as described below do not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS The exiting 54-inch concrete reinforced smilary sewer will be replaced with 21,760 feet of new 108-inch concrete reinforced pipe. The proposed pipe will be slightly smaller than 120-inch diameter pipeline originally described in the PEIR. It was determined that the sewer could not be replaced usingjack and bore methods due to the shallow pipe depth. Asa result,the entire sewer pipeline including the portion traversing the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel(flood control charnel)will be installed using standard treaching method. Also,the existing 54-inch diameter sewer located on Bushmd Street,between Ellis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue and a portion in Cape May Lane,will be abandoned in place. The new 108-inch diameter sewer will be installed to the west of the existing sewer alignment The existing pipeline located south of Yorktown Avenue will be abandoned and removed to accommodatc the placement of the new sewer. Figure 2 shows a diagram of the flood control channel crossing. Figures 3,4,and 5 provide photographs of the flood control channel at the Bushard Street crossing. A traffic control plan was prepared and submitted along with the encroachment permit applications to the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The plan details the construction sequencing.Bushard Street is a 64-foot,4-Ime collector road that serves as an access road predominantly for residents. To accommodate the trenching methods it was determined that the need for temporary road closures during construction would be required.The project will be completed in Y.to%mile segments over 18 months and will require the full closure of these segments for a period of five weeks.Construction will begin at Treatment Plant 2,progress north on Brookhurst Street to Banning Avenue,west on Banning Avenue to Bushard Street,and north on Bushard Street.At each street intersection construction is anticipated to last approximately 3 weeks.Two lanes of traffic crossing Bushard Street(westbound and eastbound)will be maintained at all times during construction activities for each of the major cross streets. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 4 Environmental Science Associates Fountain Valley Flood Control 0 Channel 19 Agriculture _ _ - N Residential w U _ Q BUSHARD STREETBUST _......_ ® _. p ® .�_.._. ..�_.. C O K Agriculture Fountain Valley H Residential Flood Control LU Channel o zo Fcn OCSD Svmegie ilmFmgrmn E/R,Iddmdm/IOI16B ■ SOURCE:Enrmmmml Xima Ruacim[ Figure 2 Bushard Street Trunk Detail _a WACE ---OCSO Swtegtr Plm Pmg,mn EIR Addendum/Figure 3 Looking east from about 150 feet west of Bushard OC f:: 1rndum/Mim0 SOLRCE:aaoye Crony 5 W+tian Lpmiv Figure 4 Looking west from south side channel 150 feet east of Bushard Trunk Sewer 1-2-4 Bushard Photographs of Fountain Valley Channel at Bushard Street Crossing Taken August 16,2001,midmorning. t L : 06D Prat ne Plan Pmgmm E/a Addendum/20/168 SOURCE:On,t Cowry Lniulim Mana Figure 5 Looking west from south side channel 150 feet east of Bushard Bushard Trunk Sewer 1-2-4 Photographs of Fountain Valley Channel at Bushard Street Crossing Taken August 16,2001,midmorning. Addendum N3 ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT MODIFICATIONS Potential impacts to environmental resoumes are evaluated further in this section. None of the proposed modifications would have a"potentially significant"environmental impact. AESTHETICS No Additionallmpacts. The project modifications would not have a substantial negative effect on the visual resources of the project area.The project will result in short term visual impacts due to construction activity. The PEIR addressed mitigation measures of possible short-tern impacts to visual resources.Mitigation measure 7.9-1a and 7.9-1b in the PEIR require that contractors restore the alignment areas to pre-project conditions or better to avoid long tern visual impacts. Contractors will be required to keep the construction area clean,orderly and free of trash and debris.The modifications to the construction methods would not alter the conclusions of the 1999 PEIR or require additional mitigation measures. No additional impacts are anticipated. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. The project construction activities will be confined to the already disturbed road right-of-way and no significant agricultural land exists in the project alignment. The PEIR identified no potential impacts to agricultural resources.The project modifications will contribute no additional impacts to agricultural resources. AIR QUALITY No Additional Impacts. Overall and short-term impacts to air quality due to construction activity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project were analyzed in the PEIR. The anticipated impacts to air quality due to construction activities for all collection system improvements were already addressed in the PEIR. Construction air emissions were found to be a significant unavoidable impact of the overall program. The change of the construction method from jacking and boring to open trench for intersections wilt not pose impacts to air quality not already addressed. The project will be subject to the dust control mitigation as provided in the PEIR. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES No Additionallmpacis. The PEIR analyzed the biological setting for the Bushard Street Trunk improvement project and determined,given the urban setting that no impacts to biological resources were expected.The entire Bushard Street Trunk is located within city streets.The only potential biological resource within the alignment is the flood control channel.Design constraints have made it necessary for the District to trench the flood control channel instead of boring beneath it.Because the trenching of the channel has the potential to impact biological resources,a 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 8 Environmental Science Associates Addendum 83 biological survey within the vicinity of the channel was completed. ESA staff biologist,Erinn - Wilson visited the site on September 17,2001 to assess the biological resources of the flood control channel and identify potential impacts due to construction activity. A detailed biological resource assessment of the potential impacts is included as Attachment A of this Addendum. The flood control channel is chamcterized as a man-made rectangular channel that collects urban and storm water runoff from Fountain Valley. The channel begins at Euclid Street (approximately 3 miles to the east)and flows into the Talbert Channel,a quarter of a mile downstream of the project site. At the time of the survey,the culvert was devoid of any vegetation and water,except for approximately one inch of urban runoff in a 4-foot brow ditch located in the center of the culvert. Downstream of the project site,the flood control channel accumulates small amounts of ponded water behind a siltation data that prevents sediment from entering Talbert Channel. The biological resources assessment provides the following conclusions: • No sensitive plant or animal species are known to occur in the project vicinity(see Attachment A)nor were they observed at the time of the site visit. • The Flood Control Channel is under the locaijurisdiction of the Orange County Flood Control District and therefore,an encroachment permit from the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department-PFRD(Orange County Flood Control District)will be required prior to construction. • The District is in the process of obtaining a Section 404(Clean Water Act)nationwide permit from U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. The absence of biological resources in the project vicinity and the incorporation of mitigation measures already adopted by the PEIR prevent construction spoils from entering the waterways.In addition,the project will comply with all the necessary permits and agreements obtained by the resources agencies and local jurisdictim.The trenching of the flood control channel will not result in any additional impacts to biological resources. CULTURAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. The PEIR analyzed the potential impacts to cultural resources by the implementation of the collection system rehabilitation project. No prehistoric or historic sites were recorded within one-quarter of a mile from the project alignment. Therefore impacts to any (mown cultural sites in the project vicinity are not expected.Furthermore,the change in construction activity would not significantly change the amount of underground disturbance at the project site. No additional impacts are anticipated. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 9 Environmental Science Associates Addendum#3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS No Additiona/Impacts. The entire project site has been significantly modified in the past by human activity. The PEIR addressed the potential for impacts to geology and soil.The change in construction procedures would not alter the analysis of the PEIR. No additional impacts are anticipated. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Additional Impacts. Abandoned crude oil lines have been identified in the vicinity of the new Bushard Trunk Sewer. Soil borings have been conducted by Gen Matrix,which indicate that there is no presence of contaminated soils in the pipeline alignment. The PEIR assesses the use of hazardous materials during construction. Implementation of the proposed construction modifications would not pose additional impacts. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY No Additionallmpacts. The PEIR analyzes the potential for the project to impact surface water as well as groundwater.The PEIR established mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts to water quality as a result of construction activities.The adopted mitigation measures(Measure 7.7- la through 7.7-1f)establish guidelines to be implemented by the contractors to minimize impacts to hydrology and water quality.The mitigation measures include the implementation of Best Management Practices(BMPs)to prevent erosion and sedimentation to avoid significant adverse impacts to surface water quality,preparation of a Spill Prevention,Control,and Countermeasure Plan,and the storing and staging of all equipment and hazardous material in designated staging areas. Implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the PEIR will minimize or avoid impacts to water quality. The District will obtain water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act from the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)prior to project activities in the channel.Additionally,prim to project implementation,the District will comply with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)prepared for the project. Adherence to the mitigation measures provided in the PEIR and compliance with the permits obtained by the RWQCB will minimize impacts to hydrology and water quality.No significant impacts are anticipated. LAND USE PLANNING No Additional Impacts. The surrounding land use of the Bushard Street is primarily single-family residences.The PEIR adequately addressed the potential impacts anticipated during the construction of the entire Bushard Trunk Sewer. Since residences are accessed through existing frontage roads and not directly from Bushard Street,full street closures included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 10 Environmental Science Associates Addendum#3 construction modifications along the alignment is not anticipated to significantly impact residences.No additional impacts to land use will occur during construction that would alter the determinations included in the PEIR regarding potential land use impacts. MINERAL RESOURCES No Additionallmpacts. All modifications will be to previously disturbed land. As analyzed in the PEIR no impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. NOISE No Additional Impacts. The PEIR assessed the potential impacts of construction activities associated with the construction of the Bushard Street Trunk Sewer.The changed construction methods would not create any additional noise impacts that would change the conclusions of impacts identified in the PEIR.Each one-block segment would be under construction for approximately two to three weeks.The project would be subject to noise mitigation provided in the PER No new impacts would be anticipated. POPULATION AND HOUSING No Additional Impacts. No impacts to population and housing were identified in the PEIR.The changes in construction method should not result in impacts to population and housing. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES No Additional Impacts. The PEM fully analyzes the potential public service impacts associated with the collection system improvement projects. Mitigation measures have been adopted in the PEIR to assure that emergency service access will not be blocked by construction activity.The contractor will provide a copy of the Traffic Control Plan to the Orange County Sheriffs Department,local police department,and fire departments prior to construction.The District will provide 72 hour notice of construction to the local service providers(Mitigation measure 7.8-1a). Mitigation measure 7.8-c also establishes the need to maintain access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities at all times and notify facilities in the project vicinity regarding construction schedule.No additional mitigation measures are necessary.The District will coordinate street closures with local emergency service providers,including the fire station at Adams Stred.No additional impacts are anticipated. RECREATION No Additional Impacts. No significant areas of recreation are within the project alignment.The altering of construction methods will not create additional impacts to recreation facilities. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 1 I Environmental Science Associates Addendum M3 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC - No Additionallmpactr. As described in the PEM Bushard Street is a 64-foot wide neighborhood collector street,with 4 travel lanes and a striped median turning lane. A bicycle lane is provided in both directions.Traffic studies included in the PER indicate that average daily trips(ADT) along Bushard Street between Ellis Avenue and Indianapolis Avenue range from 15,000 to 20,000 and 6,000 to 14,000 ADT south of Indianapolis Avenue. A number of the cross streets to Bushard Street have average daily traffic volumes of 15,000 to 30,000 vehicles. The PEIR analyzes the potential for the various collection system improvement projects to impact traffic circulation. The document assesses public streets and highways within the project alignment as well as roadway geometries and traffic control.The PEIR acknowledged the potential for partial and full street closures.In the final response to comments to the PEIR the District acknowledged that full street closures might be necessary for the implementation of the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project.The PEIR provides mitigation measures(Measure 7.2-la through 7.2-Ij)to address traffic impacts associated with the anticipated lanes closures along Brookhurst Street and full street closures along Bushard Street and Banning Street. The mitigation measures also include a procedure for developing a construction schedule and a traffic control plan that minimizes traffic impacts during the constroction of the project.The traffic control plan and construction schedule has been submitted to the City of Huntington Beach.The following measures will be implemented. • Prior to implementation of any traffic control plan it will be required that the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley shag approve the plan before an encroachment permit can be obtained. • The project will be completed in approximately 18 months. • General work hours will be weekdays,between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.or to the specifications of the local encroachment permit. • Construction will begin at Treatment Plant 2 with the construction along Brookhurst Street. Two Ines of traffic will be maintained along Brookhurst Street for the duration of the project. • Phased construction will result in full street closure of -%miles segments of Bushard Street for five weeks per segment and Banning Avenue for four weeks. • At each street intersection construction is anticipated to last approximately 3 weeks.Two Ines of traffic will be maintained for the cross streets at each intersection. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 12 Environmental Science Associates Addendum q3 CONCLUSION The proposed construction modifications to the Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project do not require the adoption of additional mitigation measures that were not already included within the PEIR.Furthermore,the modifications do not change the conclusions of the PEIR regarding the significance of environmental impacts. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 13 Environmental Science Associates Addendum,M3 REFERENCES Orange County Sanitation District, 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, October 1999. Orange County Sanitation District,Strategic Plan Collection System(Vol.3,Part(s)). 1999. Orange County Sanitation District,Bushard Trunk Sewer Preliminary Design Report,Boyle Engineering,February 2001. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 14 Environmental Science Associates ATTACHMENT A Biological Reconnaissance Survey BIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AT THE BUSHARD STREET OVERPASS October,01,2001 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a biological reconnaissance survey conducted of the Fountain Valley Flood Control Channel (flood control channel)at Bushard Street in the City of Fountain Valley. The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)proposes the replacement of an existing sewer pipe that is currently under the flood control channel at this location. Placement of the new 5 x I0-foot concrete box culvert to replace the existing 54-inch sewer pipe will require the trenching through the channel. A biological reconnaissance survey of the site was conducted by ESA biologist Erinn Wilson on September 17,2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine whether wetland habitat exists within the flood control channel and analyze the potential impacts of the project to biological resources. EXISTING CONDITIONS The flood control channel is characterized as a man-made rectangular channel that collects urban and stomt water mn-off from Fountain Valley. The flood control channel is a blue line stream that begins at Euclid Street(approximately 3 miles to the east)to where it flows into Talbert Channel,a quarter of a mile downstream of the project site. At the time of the survey the flood control channel was devoid of any vegetation and water,except for approximately one inch of urban run-off in a 4-foot brow ditch, located in the center of the culvert. Downstream of the project site,the flood control channel accumulates small amounts of ponded water behind a siltation dam that prevents sediments from entering Talbert Channel. VEGETATION At the proposed project site there is no vegetation present in the flood control channel. Small amounts of algae were observed under the bridge and downstream of the project site where the water has ponded or slowed. No vegetation exists on the perimeter of the flood control channel because it is maintained as an access road separating the flood control channel from surrounding residential properties. WILDLIFE Although the flood control channel is concrete lined,with the loss of more than 90°/n of the states wetlands,urban channels can become important habitat for migrating and resident bird species that can tolerate urban conditions.Only a few species were identified at the project site at the time of the survey. Killdeer(Chandra;voicifems)and common crow(Corvus bmchyryhynchos)were the only bird species identified at the crossing location. Mallard ducks(Anal platyrhynchos)were present a quarter of a mile down stream where Talbert Channel begins. SPECIAL STATUS PLANT AND ANMIALS No special status plants or animals are known to occur in the project vicinity. STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS Although the flood control channel does not support any sensitive vegetation or animals,the flood control channel is waters of the United States(Newport Beach 7.5 USGS Quadrangle Map)subject to thejurisdiction of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,California Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed construction activities will require the consultation with these agencies and the possible acquisition of one in more of the following permits or agreements. US Army Corps of Engineers The flood control channel is characterized as a"waters of the United States"and is therefore subject to the regulation of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE). The ACOE regulates the discharge of fill material into'Jurisdictional waters of the United States"under Section 404 of the federal Clean water Act(CWA)(1972,33 U.S.C. 1344).Any project resulting in the placement of dredging or fill material into waters of the United States require the procurement of a CWA Section 404 permit from the ACOE.Select activities may be authorized under general permits(i.e.pre-authorized nationwide permits)subject m certain conditions. Utility line construction activities that are not likely to impact sensitive species,like the proposed project,may be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 12.Under Nationwide 12 the project would fall under the non-reporting category but must comply with the conditions of that permit. California Department offish and Game California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG)regulates activities that would interfere with the natural flow of,or subsequently altar,the channel,bed,or bank of a river,lake,or stream,under the California Fish and Game Code(Section 1600). A Streambed Alteration Agreement(16017 for private individuals)would be required if such inferences were to occur to protect the integrity of biological resources and water quality. Regional Water Quality Control Board The Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)under Section 301,401,402,and 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Porter-Cologne Act requires that the discharge of dredging or fill material into waters of the United States does not violate state water quality standards. Applicants for Section 404 from the ACOE,including most non-reporting nationwide permits,must obtain a certification from the RWQCB as a condition of approval for those ACOE permits. The District will obtain a 404 permit for this project. TEMPORARY DEWATERING Temporary dewmering of the flood control channel would be required during construction activity to install the proposed pipeline. During construction within the waterway,the contractor will divan the =tire streamflow around the work area in the flood control channel. Appropriate measures as described in the PEIR will be taken to maintain near normal downstream Bows by maintaining the existing siltation dam a quarter of a mile from the project site. Installation of the sewer pipeline will occur in the summer dry season when the level of water flow for the flood control channel will be at its lowest. CONCLUSION AND DETERMINATION The proposed project is not expected to have any significant impacts to the biology or the water quality of the flood control channel or its receiving waterbodies(Talbert Channel which leads to the Pacific Ocean). The flood control channel crossing at Bushard Street occurs in an was with minimal habitat value with only a few common avian species observed utilizing the channel.The project will have minimal impacts to water quality and biological resources based on the following conclusions: • No sensitive species of plants or animals are known or expected to occur in the project vicinity; • The project applicant will obtain and comply with all necessary permits required for the construction of the proposed project; • The construction of the project will avoid any impacts to waterways and water quality by implementing a dewatering plan that will prevent concoction spoils from entering the channel; • The project will also include the implemented Best Management Practices(BMPs)in the PEIR and specified in the projecCs adopted SWPPP that would avoid or minimize potential discharges of pollutants into waterways from the construction area. Addendum #4 WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11 -22 Orange County Sanitation District 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report November 2001 4221 Wilshirn Boukeard 225 Bush Sueet 1000 Bmadwq 700 Uaivenity A.ue 2685 Ulmenoa Rd. amtymmaM Suite 480 Suite 1700 Suite 410 Suite 130 0102 Los Auplm S.Ftad., Oaklaml, Sauamemo, Clevwater, ESA Aawdal.a California Califomia California Caliromia Florida 90 M512 94104 94607 95825 33762 (323)9334111 (415)8%.5900 (510)M5066 4916)5"4500 (727)5TL5226 Addendum/4 INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15164 as Addendum No. 4 to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the Orange County Sanitation District (District) 1999 Strategic Plan to address improvements to be made to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer. The PEIR assessed potential impacts of the Strategic Plan through the year 2020, including collection system improvements, treatment system upgrades, and disposal capacity improvements. The District certified the PEIR in October 1999. The 1999 Strategic Plan provides a framework for collection system pipeline improvements for District facilities. Since the certification of the PEIR, collection system pipeline improvements have been modified for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer. The modified plans provide for the replacement of approximately 7,500 more linear feet of sewer than was assessed in the 1999 PEIR for the project. The additional sewer segments would be within Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street as shown in Figure 1. A portion of the additional sewer (on Warner Avenue, from Algonquin Street to Bolsa Chica Street) is currently owned by the City of Huntington Beach. This Addendum describes the proposed plans and assesses whether they would pose environmental impacts that were not already addressed in the PEIR. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR identifies the District's capital improvement projects proposed to meet future demand for wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities through 2020. Projects are proposed to replace and rehabilitate sewer collection systems, expand and upgrade the District's two wastewater treatment plants, provide adequate discharge capacity for projected peak flows, provide additional treated wastewater to the Orange County Water District for expanded water reuse, and study the feasibility of other improvements. The objectives of the 1999 Strategic Plan are: 1) To plan for the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facilities to serve the needs of the District's service area through 2020. 2) To insure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharge permit conditions, including the requirements of the 301(h) modified (secondary treatment waiver) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDFS)permit. 3) To recommend projects that meet the communities needs, protect public health, are technically feasible, and are cost effective and environmentally responsible; and 4) To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR I Environmental Science Associates Addendum H4 The Collection System Element of the 1999 Strategic Plan (Volume 3) identified specific trunk sewers that needed improvements in order to accommodate projected flow rates through 2020. The PEIR listed collection system capital improvement projects and assessed the potential impacts in environmental resources resulting from related construction activities. The District operates 12 trunk sewer systems that collect and convey wastewater to the District's Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 and counter to 400 miles of trunk sewers within the service area. The Knon Trunk Sewer System is one of the trunk sewer systems identified as having hydraulic capacity deficiencies. One of these deficient segments identified along the Knott Truck Sewer System was the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer. The PEIR identified two reaches of the trunk sewer segment along Warner Avenue Relief Sewer in the City of Huntington Beach in need of replacement. The PEIR contains an assessment of the proposed Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project and the potential environmental impacts that may arise as a result of construction activities. However, the modified design for the project include replacement of a 7,500-Coot stretch of pipeline within Warner Avenue and Bolas Chica Street that was not assessed in the PEIR. A segment of this pipeline located on Warner Avenue, from Bolm Chica Street to Algonquin Street is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. This Addendum addresses the additional sewer replacement pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Project would replace and/or rehabilitate existing sanitary sewer pipeline within the City of Huntington Beach as shown on Figure 1. The project was assessed in the PEIR to replace approximately 6,087 linear feet of pipeline within non-contiguous segments along Wamer Avenue and along Los Pates Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. Since the publication of the PEIR, the project has been modified to replace or rehabilitate an additional 7,5W feet of pipeline within Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street (the final design of pipeline lengths may differ slightly). The modified project would occur within Warner Avenue from Springdale Street west to Algonquin Street, on Bolas Chica Street from Warner Avenue to Los Pates Avenue, and on Los Pates Avenue from Bolas Chica Sneer west to Marina View Place. Figure 1 shows the modified project location. The project would encompass a total of approximately 14,000 linear feet. Some sections would be replaced using trenching methods, while other segments would be relined. Some of the existing pipeline would be abandoned in place and some may be removed. The project would involve trenching westerly along Warner Avenue from Springdale Street to Algonquin Street and on Bolas Chica Street from Warner Avenue to Los Pates. In most locations, the trench would be approximately five feet wide and approximately 14 feet deep. The dimensions of the excavation could vary depending on construction activities and tie-in designs at specific locations. The District will abandon in place the 21-inch pipeline within Warner Avenue and replace it generally with the same size pipe. Certain smaller segments along Warner Avenue would be 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 2 Environmental Science Associates HEIL AV N D Addition to Project - 4p\ WARNER A ...., e n Y ".. Hi NTINGTON BEP CH — L ley PpT05 AVE cu! nGVOOT° _ I IRANGE COUNT e1V•FL SLATER AV Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Project Area " as Assesed in the PEIR z nrlr !� ,Aaxmi LPACJFIC � TALgBOLSA CHICAECeLCCJCryRESEM wuare:!>om•,am.u�• - _- -- - - — --lvwi rxsn s.m . Figure I Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Project Location Addendam S4 replaced with 36-inch diameter pipe and three (3), 18-inch diameter pipes. The segment on Warner Avenue from Algonquin Street to Bolsa Chica Street would involve abandoning-in-place the existing deteriorating, 21-inch diameter pipeline and installing the same size pipe along side the old pipeline. The existing 21-inch pipe segment south of Warner Avenue along Bolas Chica Street to Los Palos Avenue would be abandoned in place and a new 21-inch line would be installed. The 21-inch pipeline within Los Palos Avenue to Marina View would be relined (rehabilitated) as stated in the PEIR. This segment would not require trenching. Trenches along Warner Avenue and Rolm Chita Street would be braced using a trench box or speed shoring. The active work area along the trench would extend approximately 35 to 40 feet. The work area would extend five to ten feet to one side of the trench and approximately 20 to 30 feet on the opposite side of the trench to allow for construction vehicle access. Pavement and soils excavated from the trench would be transported off site for disposal. Backfll for the site would be imported and stockpiled near the open trench. It is estimated that approximately 15,000 to 20,000 cubic yards of soil would be removed from the trench to be loaded onto dump trucks and hauled away for disposal. Once the new pipeline is in place, Elie stockpiled backfill would be placed in the trench and the streets would be paved and compacted in accordance with City regulations. Land uses adjacent to the project include single and multi-family residences along Warner Avenue and Bum Chica Street, and commercial developments at the corner of Warner Avenue and Rolm Chica Street (Figures 2, 3, and 4). The PEIR assessed impacts associated with construction of the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project including trenching activities along Warner Avenue. The construction methods for the additional sewer replacement would be similar to the methods described in the PER including trenching and relining. The PEIR has acknowleged that a temporary road closure could occur during repair of pipeline. However, no full street or intersection closures are anticipated in occur m a result of the modifications to the proposed project. All of the mitigation measures identified in the PEIR and in the mitigation monitoring and reporting plan would apply equally to the additional pipeline replacement. Additional time of approximately three to four months may be required to complete construction activities due to the replacement and repair of these pipelines. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT MODIFICATIONS Potential impacts to emironmetrtal resources are evaluated further in this section. None of the proposed modifications would have a "potentially significant" environmental impact or would alter the conclusions of the PEIR. The following environmental resources are identified in the CEQA Guidelines and were assessed in the PEIR. AMTHMCS No AddWand Impacts. The 1999 PEIR identified the need to mitigate visual impacts related to trenching and pipe-laying activities applicable to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project. The 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 4 Environmental Science Associates --- ----------- - - - - - —OCSD IM.U-nia Plan PVR12011MM SOURCE Science.—ails Figure 2 View of Intersection of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica,Facing West �o OCSD 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR12011ME SOURCE:Envimnmenul&iavwe Auo[iues Figure 3 View of Intersection of Warner Avenue and Algonquin,Facing East Y ocsoiw Rs eairrmnvcrximti E Figure 4 Yew of Intersection of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica. Facing South Addendum N4 revised project would not create additional impacts and no additional mitigation measures other than those mentioned in the 1999 PEIR are required. Implementation of the mitigation measures associated with trenching (1999 PEIR, pg. 7.9-2)would lessen the impact to aesthetic resources to a less than significant level. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. The project is not located on agricultural land. As a result, the modification to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer will have no effects on agricultural resources in the area. AIR QUALITY No Additional Impacts. Installation of the replacement pipeline would require the use of heavy-duty construction equipment for excavation activities. The 1999 PEIR identified this project and assessed overall impacts of air emissions associated with construction activity. Additional time of approximately three to four months may be required to complete construction activities due to the replacement and repair of the pipeline. The revised project plan would employ assumed construction methods that have already been assessed in the 1999 PEIR. The PEIR identified air emissions during construction activities m a significant and unavoidable impact of the overall capital improvements program identified in the Strategic Plan. However,given the scale of the modification to the project and short-term nature of construction activities, no significant changes to the air quality impact assessment would be necessary. Mitigation measures identified in the PEIR would apply to the modified project(1999 PEIR, pg. 7.5-9) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. The revised project would not impact biological resources in the area. No trees would be removed as a result of winching activities along Warner Avenue, from Springdale to Algonquin Street and along Bolas Chica Street, from Warner Avenue to Los Pains. The PEIR indicates that no additional impacts to biological resources would be anticipated as a result of the original project, since no undisturbed land would be affected (1999 PEIR, pg. 7.3-2). The pipeline replacement and repair along Warner Avenue and Balsa Chica Street would not change this conclusion. No additional impacts to biological resources are anticipated. CULTURAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. Potential impacts to cultural resources associated with implementation of the 1999 Strategic Plan were addressed within the PEIR, Chapter 7.10. No additional impacts to cultural resources would occur as a result of modification to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Project. Mitigation measures identified in the PEIR (pg. 7.10-6) would equally apply to the new construction site as a result of the additional sewer replacement. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 7 Environmental Science Associates Addendum p4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS No Additional Impacts. The project area has been extensively modified in the past by human activity. Potential impacts relating to construction activities including erosion, were addressed in the PEIR. Trenching activities related to the project modification would not alter the analysis contained in the PEIR. Implementation of the mitigation measures associated with trenching (1999 PER, pg. 7.6-3) would lessen the geologic impacts to a less than significant level. No additional impacts are anticipated. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Additional Impacts. The PEIR assesses the use of hazardous materials during construction. Implementation of the proposed project modification would not pose additional impacts. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY No Additional Impacts. Construction activities and trenching along Warner Avenue and Bolsa Aden Street will comply with construction Best Management Practices and Mitigation Measures identified in the PEIR to reduce erosion and reduce impacts to hydrological resources to a less than significant level (1999 PEIR, pg. 7.7-3). The additional sewer segments proposed for replacement would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. No additional impacts are anticipated. LAND USE PLANNING No Additional Impacts. The PEIR identified land uses adjacent to two segments of the proposed project including the Balsa Chica Ecological Reserve, the Meadowlark Golf Course, single and multi-family residences, and commercial development. Land uses identified near the areas adjacent to the extended project locations are similar to those assessed in the PEIR, including residential and commercial developments. land uses along Warner Avenue adjacent to where trenching would take place consist of the golf course, single and multi-family residences, and commercial development. There are no schools located along Warner Avenue or Bolm Chien Street within the project area. Construction activities taking place adjacent to residences will be of a short duration. Therefore, the revised project would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. No effects to current land uses are anticipated. MINERAL RESOURCES No Additional Impacts. Trenching will occur within previously disturbed soils. No additional impacts to mineral resources are anticipated as a result of modifications to the proposed project. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR S Environmental Science Associates Addendum#4 NOISE No Additional Impacts. The PEIR assessed potential noise impacts related to construction activities along Warner Avenue and Los Patos Avenue. Implementation of the mitigation measures already identified in the 1999 PEIR (pg. 7.4-10) would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Sensitive receptors include single and multi-family residences which is similar to other segments of the project. No additional noise impacts are anticipated from the replacement or repair of the pipeline project. The residences adjacent to the extended project areas would be notified as required by PEIR Mitigation Measure 7.4-ld. No additional impacts would be anticipated. POPULATION AND HOUSING No Additional Impacts. All modifications to the project will occur within city streets and will not impact population or housing in the area. The capacity of the pipeline will remain similar to existing capacity, except for those locations that are restricted by pipeline design. No additional capacity is anticipated to be added as a result of the project modification. However, the PEIR assessed impacts of increased capacity to accommodate projected growth in the general area. PUBLIC SERVICES No Additional Impacts. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on police and fire services. Mitigation measures identified in the PEIR (page 7.84) would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. The project will have a positive effect on sewer and wastewater collection services by increasing the efficiency of the pipeline through replacement or repair. There are no additional impacts and no mitigation measures are required. RECREATION No Additional Impacts. The Meadowlark Golf Course is located on Warner Avenue in the location of the proposed project. The golf course was identified in the PEIR. The PEIR concludes that the proposed construction activities would not impact recreational uses of the golf course. A bike-lane located along Warner Avenue may be temporarily impacted by trenching activities. Such activities were assessed in the PEIR and therefore no additional impacts are anticipated by the proposed project. The modified Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. Recreation will not be impacted by the proposed project. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC No Additional Impacts. The PER addressed impacts to traffic as a result of construction activities on Warner Avenue and Los Pates Avenue. The revised project would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. Although the construction activities would extend farther west along Warner Avenue and within Bolas Chica Street, no additional impacts to traffic or transportation are anticipated by the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 9 Environmental Science Associates • Addendum p4 revised project Access to residences and businesses would be maintained at all times during construction. No full street closures are anticipated as a result of the modified project description. Warner Avenue traverses east in west and is comprised of six lanes—three lanes in each direction— and a bike lane. The PEIR assessed traffic impacts on Warner Avenue related to trenching activities. At least one lace for each direction of traffic would be maintained during construction. Bolas Chica Street is comprised of two lanes with street parking. No trenching activities would occur on Los Pains Avenue. Given the scale of the project and temporary metre of construction activities, no additional significant impacts to traffic are anticipated. The implementation of the mitigation measures already identified in the 1999 PEIR (pg. 7.2-18) would lessen any temporary impacts to a less than significant level. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS No Additional Impacts. Modifications made to the proposed project are not expected to impact utilities and service systems. CEQA COMPLIANCE The proposed modification to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer project would not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15164, indicates that an Addendum is the appropriate document to describe minor modifications to the proposed project for which a Final FIR has already been certified. An Addendum may be prepared if the modifications do not pose additional significant impacts. A Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be required if the project modifications required major revisions to the PEIR or new information of substantial importance that was not available at the time of preparation became available. As substantiated in this Addendum, the proposed modification to pipeline activities would not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. Section 15164(e)of the CEQA Guidelines requires an Addendum to include an explanation as to why a subsequent EIR is not necessary. The proposed modification to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer is net substantial enough to require the preparation of a Subsequent EIR. The proposed project has been revised to accommodate anticipated wastewater Flows through 2020. Modifications to the project to increase the length of sewer pipeline to be replaced. The construction activities and level of effort would be similar to those described in the PEIR. No new significant environmental effects or information of substantial importance has been identified that would require a major revision, add new impacts, or substantially inerease the severity of previously identified impacts. The project proponent has not rejected any of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR. lastly, the modifications would not affect mitigation measures adopted for the District's 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 10 Environmental Science Associates Addendum#4 According to CEQA Section 15164(c), public circulation and a review period is not required for an Addendum that has been prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final EIR. REFERENCES Orange County Sanitation District, 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, June 1999. Orange County Sanitation District, 1999 Strategic Plan, Collection System Volume 3, 1999. 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR I1 Environmental Science Associates Notice of Exemption Appendix E To: ❑ Office of Planning and Research From:(Public Agency) Orange County Sanitation District 1400 Tenth Street,Room 121 109"Ellis Avenue Sacramento,CA 95814 Fountain Valley,CA 92A818 ❑ County Clerk County of Ora nga 630 N. Rroadway R1Qg. 17 _ Ctite #101 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Project Title: Area Classification Study Implementati on Plan,Plant No. 1 and No.2. Project Location-Specific: Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2. Project Locadon-City: Fountain ValleytHuntington Ocacn Project Location-Counry: Orange Description of Nature,Purpose,and Beneficiaries of ProJett: Comply with fire codes to upgrade gas distribution system,ventilation,fire alarm,electrical,and administrative systems. Name of Public Agency Approving Project Orange Cowry Sanitation District Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Orange County Sanitation District Exempt Status:(check one) ❑ Mialincral(Sec.21080(bxIk15268); ❑ Declared Em gmcy(Sw.21080(bX3k 15269(s)k ❑ Fmrgmry Poj=(See 21080(bX4);15269(bNc)); ® Camgorical Exemption.Stale rype and secdon ttumbr. Class 1,Existing Facilities,Section 15301 ❑ Statutory Exemptions.Smw code number. Reasons why project is exempt: See attached explanation. Lead Agency _ Contact Person: Jim HerberD Area CodNTelephonclExtcosion: (714) 593-7310 If fried by aprIlImkl I.Attach nding. 2.Haz athe public agency approving the project? ❑Yes ❑y Na Signature: Date: //-- —C)/ Title: a�.e dF ®Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR: ❑Signed by Applicant RrvtaedJunrll)al ♦PPENDICES`/ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Rationale for Issuing a Notice of Exemption For the Area Classification Study Implementation Plan 1 Plant No. 1 and 2, Job Number J-35-2 The attached Notice of Exemption(NOE)has been prepared by the Orange County Sanitation t � District(District)to exempt the proposed Job Number J35-2(Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants No. 1 and No. 2)from further 914)962-2411 environmental documentation requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act r°` CEQA . This memorandum brief describesproject and provides the District's rationale r11a19e2Q956 ( ) briefly the ,,,,,•,,,°m,wm for issuing the NOE. -�m.eiag•am.s.: Background '- pa ea,8127 ce (NFPA)published a recommended In 1992, the National Fire Protection Association NFPA practice rounrrn valbv.ra ,y:�,azneei2r entitled NFPA 820 which provided nationally recognized criteria for fire protection at wastewater treatment and collection facilities. Included in the criteria was a recommendation rdea a, „ to conduct a"hazardous area classification'to designate boundaries where explosion hazards "ra.e vanay,rA exist. Division I was defined as a location where an explosion hazard could exist under ,9z70eaote normal operating conditions. Division 2 was defined as a location where an explosion hazard could exist under abnormal Conditions such as accidental rupture of a vessel or Container or ra..rN, failure of a ventilating system. M.ue • In 1995, the NFPA 820 recommendations became mandatory. In addition•compliance with Clue. the electrical standards in NFPA 820 became retroactive. Installation requirements were mandated by the National Electric Code(NEC),and thus were applicable for all District pnahean facilities. As a result,District staff recommended full implementation of the NFPA 820 '> area standards for both Plants No. 1 and No. 2. �auena Perk Pgwm,n will, An Area Classification Study was completed for both plants in July 1999. The study provided :?Pmrerton the District with detailed information identifying satti potential fire and explosion hazard locations <+rnyron.sewn throughout the plants. The study identified many conditions that no longer meet the updated .?trim NFPA standards. The study also evaluated options to bring all facilities into compliance with Ce-Ha&. the latest safety standards mandated by NFPA 820. ta,Palma made r edam Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant No. 1 and No. 2 0ran9e The proposed project would implement the recommendations of the Study. In particular, the existing digester gas pipelines currently located within concrete tunnels within the plant .esaU property would be relocated out of the tunnels. The relocation would reduce potential .smmm� explosion hazards and establish compliance with current NFPA 820 standards. The gas Perk T. e"P collection and distribution system capacity would not change. No modifications would be inia arid. made outside Distract property. Other components of the project would involve administrative control procedures,ventilation and fire alarm system improvements, and electrical ° o^"ra modifications to meet current code requirements. s.mury a.crlaae Detailed project descriptions are included in the Final Report for the Area Classification Study. rMe:e The individual projects are summarized below: CtweeMidway Ory �•,.. • Gas Piping Relocation and Physical Separation of Plant Nos. 1 and 2(Job No. J-35-2): eea. ol•aH. Low-pressure digester gas piping in the tunnels at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 will be relocated to bona Ranch aboveground racks, thereby eliminating potential gas leaks inside the tunnels. The relocation will physically separate classified areas from unclassified areas. Administrative Controls Program(Job No.J-35-3): This project will develop an administrative controls program for fire prevention and protection at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This will conform to NFPA 820 requirements and provide on-going control of the fire and safety systems. To mamram wanac/ase lead.rslbp in westewarer and water resource management. . Fire Protection/Detection System, and Combustible Gas System at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 (Job No.J35-4): This project will provide gas leak and fire detection systems. The systems will provide advance safety warning to personnel at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. . Ventilation Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2(Job No. J-35-5): The ventilation system will be modified to have the capability of removing potential explosive gases throughout the classified areas at Plant Nos. 'I and 2. This will provide increased safety for maintenance personnel. . Electrical Retrofit at Plant Nos. 1 and 2(Job No. J-35-6): This project will upgrade the existing general-purpose equipment and common installation methods to reduce explosion hazards. The upgrade will isolate ignition sources from explosive concentrations of gases found within the plants. These five projects have been integrated under one single project for design under Job Number J-35-2. Implementation of the projects described above will bring the District's facilities into full compliance with NFPA 820 regulations identified in the Area Classification Study. Full implementation will significantly enhance the safety at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. CEQA Compliance Since implementation of the project requires a discretionary approval by the District Board of Directors,the project must undergo evaluation under CEQA. The proposed project was not considered as part of the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(EIR), since the study was completed after the completion of the Draft EIR. Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines defines several categories of projects that are exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. These types of projects have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant No. 1 and 2, has been determined to be eligible for a Categorical Exemption under CEQA,Section 15301, Existing Facilities. The exemption is defined in CEQA as follows: 15301. Existing Facilities Class 1 consists of the operation,repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of public or private structures,facilities, mechanical equipment,or topographic features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. ... The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. Examples include but are not limited to: (a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances; (b) Existing wastewater collection,treatment and disposal facilities and support facilities used to provide electrical power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services;... (d) Restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures,facilities,or mechanical equipment to meet current standards of public health and safety or permit requirements;... (f) Addition of safety or health protection devices for use during construction of or in conjunction with existing structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment, or topographical features including navigational devices. This includes safety equipment such as railings,access platforms, chemical handling facilities, emergency lighting systems and noise abatement facilities;... j The proposed project(J-35-2)qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project under sections 15301 a, b,d,and f. The relocation of the gas distribution pipelines falls under sections 15301(b)and (d). The project is being conducted to"meet current standards of public health and safety." Other elements of the project are also covered under sections 15301(a)and (f). The purpose and need for the project clearly meets the intent of the Class I Categorical Exemption for safety upgrades. None of the exceptions to the categorical exemption allowance listed in section 15300.2 would apply: • No significant impacts from the project would be anticipated. • The project would not contribute to cumulative impacts from safety upgrades at wastewater treatment plants. • The projects would not alter scenic resources within a designated Scenic Highway. • The project would not be located on a hazardous waste site,or affect historic resources. A NOE has been prepared for this project pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. No other documentation is required to comply with CEQA requirements. The District Board of Directors may approve the project once the NOE has been submitted to the State Clearinghouse. AA:nc G:1wp.dtalengV20%eManis12001%EIR Related infoVvea Classic Study Implem Categor Exempt Memo Final.doc MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 14, 2001, 9:30 a.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCW D offices at 9:30 a.m. on November 14, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice-Chair Iry Pickler, Chairman Brian Donahue Phil Anthony Guy Carozzo, Alternate No. 2 Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Brady, Alternate No. 3 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors: Kelli Bum Roy, Bruce Chalmers Bob Ooten Jerry King -Camp Dresser& McKee Counsel: Jan Debay Annette McCluskey- NCG Porter Novelli Brad Hogin Staff: Debbie Burris - DDB Engineering William R. Mills Jr. Ted Popowchak—CH2M Hill Steve Conklin Bill Butler— Montgomery Watson Harza Tom Dawes Dick Pascucci, Ron Young - Malcolm Pimie Shivaji Deshmukh Don Calkins, George Martin, Mike Jouhari Bill Everest - City of Anaheim Jill Everhart Terry Lane— City of Garden Grave Cindy Gehman Peter Herzog, Bill Tappan - Parsons Jenny Glasser Greg Heiertz - IRWD Clark Ida Patrick Scanlon - SCWC John Kennedy Thom Coughran— City of Santa Ana Mike Markus RonLinsky- NWRI Mehul Patel Don McIntyre Lily Pham Laura Thomas Ron Wildernuth Chairman Iry Pickler called the meeting to order at 9:39 a.m. - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes November 14, 2001 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion by Director Eckenrode seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on October 22, 2001 were approved as mailed. 2 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development. Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that within Draft 23, revisions have been made to the agreement to incorporate comments from the Committee and the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee (GPAC), as follows: A. Section 29 - Indemnity. Paragraph moved. It is used to be Section 35. B. Section 65—Termination during design. Revised. Excludes Lacy Jail Pipeline as trigger. C. Section 66—Termination during construction. Revised. Excludes Lacy Jail Pipeline Project as trigger for termination after construction. D. Section 67.2— Dispute Resolution. Reasonable timeframe for negotiations to resolve disputes and time frame for negotiations on defaults added. E. Sections 68— Force Majeure clause added. Indemnity clause revised, adding Committee members and Directors. F. Section 69 - Indemnities. Added Directors. G. Section 73—Arbitration, deleted. Mr. Dawes reported that the O&M Agreement has been reviewed by GPAC and a majority of their comments have been incorporated into the agreement and are marked in the right border of Draft 23 as "GPAC". He introduced Patrick Scanlon, GPAC Chairman, who gave a presentation on GPAC's issues of concern. Mr. Scanlon reported that there are three issues of the agreement that are still unresolved—annual operation and maintenance cost sharing, replacement cost sharing, and equitable termination conditions. Director Pickier suggested that a third party, National Water Research Institute (NW RI), review the O&M Agreement to give an impartial input on the three GPAC issues. Ron Linsky, NW RI, reported that he would 1) get staff recommendations to forth a committee; 2) the review would not cost the project any money; and 3) it could be completed by January 2002. Mr. Bradley Hogin, OCSD District Counsel, recommended that NWRI look at the three GPAC issues and related issues. - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes November 14, 2001 Director Anthony suggested to the Committee and staff that the membrane replacement costs be considered as part of the capital investment and could be shared as such, and he challenged the GPAC to define what the off-ramps should be for the project. Mr. Scanlon reported that a GPAC subcommittee consisting of Don Calkins, Anaheim; Dennis Macl-ain, Huntington Beach; and Greg Heiertz, IRWD is addressing off-ramps and would bring back a recommendation to the Committee. After lengthy discussion, the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Pickier, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the National Water Research Institute, as a third party, is authorized to review the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project for the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee's three issues: cost sharing, replacement costs and termination conditions, and related issues. 3. Addendum No. 4 with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Mr. Dawes reported that contract negotiations have been completed with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM). He reported that changes have occurred to affect the Scope of Work since approval by both Boards on March 28, 2001, including various design changes and schedule changes. He stated that while the schedule will be extended, it is not yet certain, nor is the extent of administrative support certain that may be required for the schedule extension. He noted that administrative support costs would probably be less than $200,000 based on a six-month schedule extension and will be brought back to the Committee in April 2002. He recommended that the Committee approve issuance of Addendum No. 4 for Scope of Work changes to Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. in the amount of$369,000. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Donahue and carried, the Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District, with concurrence of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District authorize issuance of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., increasing the authorized amount $369,000, from $34,964,107 to an amount not to exceed $35,333,107, for changes in the Scope of Work. 4. Chance Order No. 3 with Separation Processes, Inc. Mr. Dawes reported that administrative and design changes in the Scope of Work have occurred in the final design contract with Separation Processes, Inc. since approval on March 28, 2001. He reported that three items have occurred to contribute to the change order, which includes: deletion of supplemental errors and omissions insurance; inclusion of temporary microfiltration in the design of the permanent microfiltration building; and added process controls design for the microfiltration pre-selection - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes November 14,2001 documents. He recommended that Change Order No. 3 be approved in the amount of $114,665. The Committee requested that the updated project cost be provided in the status report. Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District, with concurrence of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District authorize issuance of Change Order No. 3 to the Separation Processes, Inc. Task Order No. 201301 increasing the authorized amount $114,665, from $1,901,410 to an amount not to exceed $2,016,075, for miscellaneous additions and changes. 5. Value Engineering Studies Ms. Debbie Bums reported that value engineering (VE) studies are required for the project for the State Water Resources Control Board State Revolving Loan application. She reported that a proposal has been received from the Wesner/Almgren Team to prepare the 70%Value Engineering Studies in an amount of$143,960. She reported that the Sub-consultant Selection Committee had reviewed the proposal and questioned the 32-hour workshop proposed by the Wesner/Almgren Team for the first VE workshop. She reported that after checking with the State Water Resources Control Board the 32-hour workshop is acceptable to them. Director Anthony reported that the Committee voted unanimously on the selection of the Wesner/Almgren Team. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Donahue and carried, the Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District, with concurrence of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District authorize issuance of a task order in an amount not to exceed $143,960 to Howard Almgren for the George M. Wesner/Howard Almgren Team to complete the 70 percent design value engineering services. 6. Acquisition of 8061 Ellis Avenue for Barrier Wells Mr. Dawes reported that the first agreement for the eight barrier well sites has been negotiated and that the property can be acquired for the appraised value of$245,000. He recommended that approval be given for the purchase, direction to start demolition proceedings, and start action for tenant relocation. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, authorization was given to: A. OCWD General Manager to purchase the property at 8061 Ellis Avenue for the amount of$245,000; and B. Direct staff and tenant relocation consultant to begin the tenant relocation process under the approved Tenant Relocation Plan, and to proceed with demolition of the structure. - 4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes November 14,2001 7. Final Plans and Specifications of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Mr. Dawes recommended that final plans and specifications for a pipeline from Water Factory 21 to Adams Avenue be approved. He reported that the pipeline is being built to serve four future injection wells, which will be placed northerly of Adam Avenue. However, this pipeline needs to be built before the wells in order to receive water from a Metropolitan Water District line in Adams Avenue to maintain the barrier during the construction period of the GWR System. He reported that the pipeline would cost approximately$3 million. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, approval was given for the final plans and specifications for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline and authorization to solicit bids. 8. Grant Status Mr. Dawes reported on the status of grant applications sent to the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Resources Control Board (grant and loan)(SW RCB). He reported that an addendum to the Environmental Impact Report on the GWR System has to be completed for the SWRCB, as well as a historical study of the two houses being acquired on Ellis Avenue, and that approval will not be made until April 2002. He reported that all SWRCB funding actions have been delayed until April 2002. He also reported that at the December 10 JCC meeting, a report addressing issues on grant funding for solar panels will be given. 9. Public Information Program Mr. Ron W ildermuth, OCWD Public Information Officer, reported that two meetings with NCG Porter Novelli had been held detailing their first 90-day approach and that a full report will be given at the Joint Board Workshop on November 17. He also gave an update and overview of the Public Information and Education Program. 10.Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. The last right-of-way agreement for the Santa Ana River pipeline has been fully executed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors. B. The construction management requests for proposals have been sent out and are due on November 30. A committee to interview the proposers will be chaired by Mike Markus, OCWD Associate General Manager, and will consist of two other OCWD department heads, three OCSD department heads, and the IRW D Engineering Manager. C. The membrane treatment pre-selection Requests for Proposals are due December 18 and at least two of three pre-qualified firms are expected to submit - 5 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes November 14, 2001 proposals. He noted that the proposal would be based on a 25-year life-cycle membrane analysis, which includes full membrane replacement. Ms. Kelli Bum-Roy gave a verbal report on the Technical Review Committee that met October 23. Mr. Dawes reported that a Joint Board Workshop will be held on Saturday, November 17 at 8:00 a.m. at OCWD and the next regular JCC meeting will be held on Monday, December 10, 2001 at 5:30 p.m. at OCWD. OCWD General Manager Bill Mills gave an update on grant funding. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:55 a.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, December 10 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. -6- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeft Date Toed.ur Dir. Ix/19/01 AGENDA REPORT ItmNoni ar 11aiNiunbw x c orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 ADDENDUM NO.4 TO CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc. for an additional amount of$369,000, for a total amount not to exceed $36,333,107, for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$184,500. SUMMARY • On March 28, 2001, the Board of Directors authorized Addendum No. 3 with Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM)for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. • Since March, there have been eleven changes in scope to the final design. • In September, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC)authorized Staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with CDM for these eleven changes. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)approval of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with CDM in an amount not to exceed $369,000 for these changes to the final design. • Addendum No. 4 would increase the CDM team's authorized budget from $34,964,107. to an amount not to exceed $35,333,107. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY A total authorization of$184,500 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The funds are being moved from contingency. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.9, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) a„,,,: v 1 Pagel ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the December 10, 2001, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. November 14, 2001, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Addendum No. 4 with Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc. WTS:jak:nc G:%w .dWagenOa%Bcard Agenda Reports12001 Board Agenda Repprte\1201MIem 20(c).CDMAM ne.i a: �, Page 2 J BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 iuolm CURRENT PROPosE71 PROPOSE FUNDS THIS E8n 1ED ESTI6%}TED PROPOSED TOTA4 PROdECTlTASK AU BUDGET ED PROJECT SUDOETp`` REVISED A4O DATE AUTHORIZATION EKTO U EKPE}�DRD. euooET euuoEr ' � ieK:ReABE, eu1i831$r '-ToohTE -pE94E9i' •' purNowznnaR, tD � �itfiULTE(s'I project Development $ 700.000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4.00 100% Studies/Peshr • 4,000.000 $ 4.000,000 S 4,000.000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 100% Consultant PSA- $ 7.500,000 S 16.400,000 $ 184.500 S 18.584.500 S 18,150,334 S 184.600 E 18.342,834 E 500,000 3% Design Staff $ 2.349,000 $ 1,349,000 $ 1.349,000 $ 1,349,000 $ 1,349,000 $ 450,000 33% ConstNClurrl Contract Is 86.481,500 $ 137,500,000 It137,500.000 $ 6.700.500 $ 8,700,500 $ 0% Construction Adminlstrallon $ 2.653.900 $ 6,021,000 $ 6,021,000 E $ - $ 0% Conswction Inspection E %. 5500 S 326.000 $ 326,000 $ $ - S 0% Contingency S 12,8951000 $ 1S,100,000 It 184.600 $ 14,916,500 $ It - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121.925.000 $ 182.700,000 S - $152700,000 $ 30.211,834 E 184,500 $ 30,396,334 S 4,954,000 16% Relmbursable Costa $ - $ 28,000.000 1 1$ 28.000,000 11 $ 750,000 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925,000 1$ 1114.700,000 1$ -1 $154700,000 11 $ 30,211.834 1 S 184,500 $ 30,398,3J4 1 $ 4,204.000 11% Funds authorized to dale Includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms or the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater RepNnlshment System with the Orange County Water Disldct "Funds authorized to dale include Pipeline at Theo Leg Jell,SCE substance construction,lemparary,office facilities,agreement and easement coals,and mfluv engineering documents from equipment whims. G 1wp.maumgUOBS&C0NTRACT6U-38Mgende reponeWec0tkgmg-36 Wdget tabM12.15.01 add 4 Wm.xialAdd.4 CDM OCSD Confidential Add.4 CDM Page 1 Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: November 14, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $369,000 From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: ADDENDUM NO. 4 WITH CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. SUMMARY Since March 2001, there have been eleven changes in our project that require action by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC) and the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District to approve changes to the final design contract with Camp, Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM). In September, the JCC authorized staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with CDM for these eleven changes. Although the JCC has authorized eight of the changes, the JCC or Boards of Directors has not authorized a formal change to the CDM contract. In addition, your attention is called to other possible that may necessitate a subsequent addendum at a future date. At this time, staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM, in an amount not to exceed $369,000. If approved, Addendum No. 4 would increase the CDM team's authorized budget from $34,964,107 to an amount not to exceed $35,333,10T RECOMMENDATION Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Approve and authorize issuance of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., increasing the authorized amount $369,000, from $34,964,107 to an amount not to exceed $35,333,107, for changes in the Scope of Work. Agendize for the November 19 OCWD Board meeting and for the December 19 OCSD Board meeting. BACKGROUND Since the March 28, 2001, "go decision', several changes have occurred in the project that affect the Scope of Work approved by your Committee for CDM. Some have - 11 - Agenda Item #3 occurred at your direction, others dictated by newly found opportunities, and finally, , some initiated by staff requests. All scope changes must be authorized and approved by your Committee, and both Boards of Directors must approve all changes in authorized funding for the work. DISCUSSION This report includes all of the changes that have occurred under the direction of your Committee which have affected the Scope of Work for the project designers, the CDM design engineering team. At the September 24, 2001, your Committee authorized staff to negotiate the appropriate revisions to the CDM contract. Based on these negotiations, we recommend proceeding now with some of the changes to the CDM Scope of Work and budget and deferring others. Following is a table that details the changes and the results of the negotiations. The eleven changes are divided into two categories, administration changes and design changes. CHANGES IN CDM TEAM SCOPE ITEMS DATE OF JCC OF WORK,ADDING(OR DELETING)TIME OR COST NEGOTIATED VALUES SHOWN 1. Various Administration Changes that add administration costs not included in the Scope of Work approved by both Boards on March 28, 2001. a. Selection Process for Electrical, 3/19/01 $19,800 Structural, and Architectural Services. b. Added work for GPAC, about $3,000/month. Length of time 3/28/01 $90,000 assumed to be May 2001 to December (Both Boards) 2003. c. Added Administrative charges for Deferred until Microfiltration extending the project schedule past 7/9/01 Pre-Selection is completed May 2005. and Ultraviolet Light Equipment d. Change in the study for 66 W Power New Services to OCSD. ($16,532) 2. Design Changes a. Elimination of Temporary Power Station and addition of Substation 8/13/01 $50,000 Transformer Design for the new 66 W "Water' Substation. b. Design of five monitoring wells. Design of monitoring wells was not in Scope of Work. (Note: Construction of four monitoring wells was in the g/10I01 $9,450 construction budget; DHS has requested adding the fifth monitoring well. Construction inspection will be done by the Construction Manager.) - 2 - Agenda Item #3 CHANGES IN CDM TEAM SCOPE ITEMS DATE OF JCC OF WORK,ADDING(OR DELETING)TIME OR COST NEGOTIATED VALUES SHOWN c. Inclusion of Temporary MF in Permanent MF Building. Temporary MF was originally to be skid-mounted, operated during construction and then 7/30/01 $76,000 removed. Now we plan to relocate it to become part of the permanent MF facility, increasing Phase 1 MF capacity from 80 to 86 mgd. d. Change in pipeline and well locations on City of Huntington Beach property, north of Adams Street and just recently 7l9/01 $13,500 on the Faith Lutheran Church site. (Note: The Huntington Beach change will result in lower acquisition cost). e. Design of the project and construction management temporary offices as a 09/10/01 $11,407 separate construction contract. f. Addition of a scaled, physical hydraulic model and a computerized model of the pumping stations by a specialized modeling firm, ENSR International, as New $125.000 part of the CDM design team. (Includes $12,000 for CDM Team to review and oversee). g. Reduced process controls design for the MF Pre-Selection documents. (Note: This work was completed by New ($9,625) Separation Processes, Inc., our membrane designers.) TOTAL $369,000 ANALYSIS All of these items, with the exception of the modeling of the pump stations, the change in the study for 66kV Power Services to OCSD, and the reduced process controls design for the MF Pre-Selection documents, have been previously discussed with your Committee. The dates, discussions and any actions taken by the JCC are noted under 'Prior Committee Actions' below. Staff recommends that both scaled physical and computer models of the Reverse Osmosis Transfer Pump Station and the Product Water/Barrier Water Pump Station be prepared, as a precaution to ensure the pump stations will hydraulically operate as designed. The pump stations must be designed for the Phase 1 flows and also for the ultimate flow. The physical hydraulic model would be built on a mathematical scale that - 3 - Agenda Item #3 would verify that the design could serve both operating conditions. The computer model would provide further verification of the design. Both models would be completed by ENSR International, a firm specializing in this work. As the design engineers, the CDM team would direct and coordinate the modeling work. Constructing the model is a judgment call, a safety net that would add $125,000 to the design costs. These pump stations are estimated at a capital cost of$19.8 million. Staff recommends that a study to evaluate feeding 66 kV power to OCSD from or adjacent to the new OCWD substation be reduced in scope. SCE will not consider the two agencies under the same project. Each agency must make arrangements with SCE separately. As a result of this initial investigation, the remainder of the study is not needed. Space is available for a separate, adjacent OCSD substation. The third new item involves process control design work that was originally in the CDM team's Scope of Work. During the preparation of the MF Pre-Selection documents, this work was completed by Separation Processes, Inc. at the direction of staff. This change represents a deduction from the CDM budget. WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ADDENDUM Addendum No. 4 addresses changes to the Scope of Work that were identified through the design process. Most will save the project money, such as our designing and building the "Water" Electrical Substation, while others will ensure that the project is highly efficient, such as the pump station hydraulic modeling. While we have reported to you that we believe the schedule will be extended, we have not included any changes in professional services for that extension. We are not yet ready to negotiate an increase for this extension for two reasons. First, the schedule is in flux. It may be longer or shorter than we now think, however, by the Spring of 2002, after receipt of our MF and UV Equipment Pre-Selection proposals, we expect to be able to firm our schedule. The second is we may not need as much support from the CDM team in the final commissioning period as we do earlier. We believe it is prudent to wait until Spring 2002 when the 60 percent design is completed and the project cost estimate is updated to confirm the schedule. We are also reviewing our progress and goals on the operating computer (transactional) system integration and may recommend changes in that program. If recommended, some changes could affect the CDM team Scope of Work. Our professional services agreement with CDM requires cost adjustments to the remaining balance of authorized funding each April, based on the January-to-January adjustment of the Consumer Price Index. Therefore, in April, we will prepare Addendum No. 5 for your consideration and can include these omitted items if we feel they are warranted. -4 - Agenda Item #3 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS March 19, 2001 —Approval by JCC for Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement, with the exception that structural, electrical, architectural and the computer systems integrator be competitively selected. March 28, 2001 — By action of both Boards, Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement approved, Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee formed, and direction given to implement eleven Producer recommendations to extent possible. April 9, 2001 — Direction given by JCC to prepare a Request for Proposals for structural, electrical and architectural services and list of architects to include firms drawn from a wider area than the Orange County area for review by the Committee, with the proposals to be received by the Consultant Selection Subcommittee for final recommendation to the Joint Cooperative Committee. May 14, 2001 — Direction given by JCC to issue Request for Proposals for electrical, structural and architectural services, to proceed with review of the proposals, and to bring a recommendation for selection back to this Committee. June 11, 2001 — Proposals received and direction given by JCC for staff interview the structural engineering, architectural, and electrical engineering firms and meet with the Consultant Selection Subcommittee after all interviews have taken place. July 9, 2001 — JCC authorized selected electrical, structural, and architectural firms to include in CDM contract. July 9, 2001 —Staff presented issues causing delays to the design schedule. July 9, 2001 — Staff reported on potential well site location changes in the City of Huntington Beach. July 9, 2001 —Staff reported on relocating GWR System Team to temporary trailers. July 30, 2001 — Staff presented a revised project schedule with a six-month delay in the project. July 30, 2001 — The JCC approved staff recommendations on procurement procedures and design criteria for microfiltration (MF) and ultraviolet light disinfection. Design criteria recommended by staff included a change to incorporate the 6 mgd temporary MF units into the permanent MF facilities, increasing the capacity from 80 to 86 mgd. August 13, 2001 — Staff presented modified design for power supply design at a project cost savings and JCC authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with Southern California Edison for the modified design. - 5 - Agenda Rem #3 September 10, 2001 — JCC authorized actions to construct and furnish temporary offices for the GWR System Team and construction management consultant. September 24, 2001 — JCC authorized staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM for changes in the Scope of Work. -6 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Kee^"9°ate To ad.or Di. 12/19/01 AGENDA REPORT 11eniNon1b� 1oeinNin ff zotm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TASK ORDER WITH SEPARATION PROCESSES, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 3 to Separation Processes, Inc., Orange County Water District Task Order No. 201301, for an additional amount of$114,665, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,016,075,for changes in the Scope of Work to the final design of membrane systems for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$57,333. SUMMARY • On March 28, 2001 the Board of Directors authorized a change to the task order with Separation Processes, Inc. (SPI)for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for membrane systems for the Groundwater Replenishment System. • Since March, there have been three changes in the SPI scope for the final design. • In September, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC)authorized staff to negotiate Change Order No. 3 with SPI for these three changes. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District approval of Change Order No. 3 to Orange County Water District Task Order No. 201301 with SPI in an amount not to exceed $114,665 for these changes to the final design. • Change Order No. 2 would increase the SPI authorized budget from$1.901,410 to an amount not to exceed $2,016,075. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY A total authorization of$57,333 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The funds are being moved from contingency. w•.m:a 1 Page 1 r• BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.8, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the November 14, 2001, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement(EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R)System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. November 14, 2001, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Change Order No. 3 with Separation Processes, Inc. WTS:jo:nlc G1wyAtaragenda0oard Agenda Reporls=l Board Agenda Reports\12g1gtenn 20(d).5eparatlunPmAoo w.w WOM Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 ONGINAL OURNM PROPOSED PROPOSED FURDB 7RIs n TED- EBTWTEO PROJECTRASK AUTN MM ►ROJGCT BUDOETi: Room AUTNORIgO AUIi10�A nON FRDFQBED TOTAL 'ezPl7111RUGe EV1016ED' BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE% BIIDOGT TO DATE REgYbeT ' AUfNPR,IfATION: TO0ATB' -TOD001if Project Denilo nl E 700.000 $ 4,000 $ 4,OOD $ 4,000 E 4,000, $ 4,000 100% StudleslPBrmRin 4,000,000 S 4,000,000 S 4.000.000 $ 4.000,000 E 4.000.000 10D% Consultant PSA• $ 7.500,000 $ 18.400,000 $ 57.333 S 10,457,333 $ 18.342.83/ f 57.333 S 18.400,167 E 5D0,000 3% Design Stab $ 2,349.00D $ 1.349,0001 $ 1.349.000 1 $ 1,349,000 $ 1.349,000 1 $ 450.000 33% Construction Contract S $6.451.500 $ 137.500,000 $137.500.000 S 0,700,500 $ 6,700,500 1 $ 0% Construction Adminlstralion $ 2,853,900 S 6,021,000 $ 6.021.000 $ $ - $ 0% ConNrvWon Inspection S 9.345.600 $ 326.000 It 326.000 $ S - $ 0% Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 15,100,000 f 57,333 $ 15.042.657 $ i - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL It 121,925.000 E 182.700,000 $ - S182,700,000 $ 30.396.334 E 57.333 S 30,453.667 $ 4,954,000 16% RBlmbureaMe Coats E - $ 25.000.000 1 1$ 26,000,000 1 1 E 750.000 PROJECT NET S 121,925,000 1 S 154.700.000111 -I S 154,700.000 11 If 30,398.334 f 57.333 $ 30.453.667111 4.204,000 14% Funds authorized to dale Includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of IN Cooperate"Agreement for Project Planning for me Groundwater Replenishment System weh the Orange County Water District "Funds authorised to data Include Pipeline at Theo Lary Jell,SCE substation conslnlctlon,temporary office facilities,agreement and easement costs,and m0uv engineering documents from equipment"Mon. G1wp.dtabngUOBS 8 CONTRACTSU-38tegends repoNaMec011spNN6 budget lable12.15-01 W3 spl.sisjw3spi OCSD Confidential co3spi Page 1 Agenda Item 04 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: November14, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $114,665 From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: NIA Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 WITH SEPARATION PROCESSES, INC. SUMMARY Since March 2001, there have been three changes in our project that require action by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC) and the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District to approve changes to the final design contract with Separation Processes, Inc. (SPI). Staff has previously addressed one of these project changes with the JCC, while the other changes are presented for the first time with this report. Although the JCC has authorized the change that involved increasing the microfiltration capacity from 80 to 86 mgd, the JCC or Boards of Directors has not authorized a formal change to the SPI contract for the additional work. At the September 24, 2001, the JCC authorized staff to negotiate Change Order No. 3 with SPI. As a result, staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to the SPI Task Order adding an amount not to exceed $114,665. If approved, Change Order No. 3 would increase the SPI's authorized budget from $1,901,410 to an amount not to exceed $2,016,075. RECOMMENDATION Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Approve and authorize issuance of Change Order No. 3 to the Separation Processes, Inc. Task Order No. 201301 increasing the authorized amount$114,665, from $1,901,410 to an amount not to exceed $2,016,075, for miscellaneous additions and changes. Agendize for the November 19 OCWD Board meeting and for the December 19 OCSD Board meeting. BACKGROUND Since the March 28, 2001, 'go decision", some changes have occurred in the project that affect the Scope of Work approved by your Committee for SPI, our membrane designers. Some have occurred at your direction, others dictated by newly found - 1 - Agenda Item #4 opportunities, and finally, some initiated by staff requests. All scope changes must be authorized and approved by your Committee, and both Boards of Directors must approve all changes in authorized funding for the work. DISCUSSION This report includes all of the changes that have occurred under the direction of your Committee which have affected the SPI Scope of Work for the final design of the microfiltration and reverse osmosis components of the project. At the September 24, 2001, your Committee authorized staff to negotiate the appropriate revisions to the SPI Task Order. Following is a table that details the changes and the results of the negotiations. One is an administration change and the other two are design changes. CHANGES IN SPI ITEMS DATE OF JCC SCOPE OF WORK,ADDING (OR DELETING)TIME OR COST NEGOTIATED VALUES SHOWN 1. Administration Change a. Deletion of the original requirement to add a second layer of Errors and New ($70,000) Omissions (E & O) Liability Insurance. 2. Design Changes a. Inclusion of Temporary MF in Permanent MF Building. Temporary MF was originally to be skid-mounted, operated during construction and then removed. 7i30/01 $175,040 Now we plan to relocate it to become part of the permanent MF facility, increasing Phase 1 MF capacity from 80 to 86 mgd. b. Added process controls design for the MF Pre-Selection documents. (Note: This work was originally included in the Camp, Dresser& McKee, Inc. Scope of New $9.625 Work, but was completed by Separation Processes, Inc. as part of their work on the MF Pre-Selection documents.) TOTAL $114,665 ANALYSIS The first change will result in a cost savings. SPI provided E & O insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 (each claim) and $2,000,000 (annual aggregate). For Change Order No. 2, we requested that they add a second layer of extra E & O insurance, at a premium cost of $70,000 (for 4 years). However, this requirement was not included in Change Order No. 2. Deleting the cost of the premium from SPI's budget results in a savings of$70,000. - 2 - Agenda Item #4 The second change, incorporating the temporary microfiltration system into the permanent microfiltration building, thereby increasing the capacity of the microfiltration facility from 80 to 86 mgd, was discussed with your Committee last July. The third change, added process controls design for the MF Pre-Selection documents, is new and involves work that was originally to have been done by Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM), but was shifted to SPI during the course of preparation of the MF Equipment Pre-Selection documents. An equal amount is deducted from CDM in Addendum No. 4. WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CHANGE ORDER Change Order No. 3 addresses changes to the Scope of Work, changes that were identified through the design process. While we have reported to you that we believe the schedule will be extended, we have not included any changes in professional services for that extension. We are not yet ready to negotiate an increase for this extension because the schedule is in flux. It may be longer or shorter than we now think, however, by the Spring of 2002, after receipt of our MF and UV Equipment Pre-Selection proposals, we expect to be able to firm our schedule. We also believe it is prudent to wait until Spring 2002 when the 60 percent design is completed and the project cost estimate is updated to confirm the schedule. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS March 19, 2001 — Approval by JCC for Change Order No. 2 to the SPI Task Order for final design of the microfiltration and reverse osmosis components of the GWR System. March 28, 2001 — By action of both Boards, SPI Change Order No. 2 to Task Order 201301 contract was approved. July 9, 2001 — Staff presented issues causing delays to the design schedule. July 30, 2001 — Staff presented a revised project schedule with a six-month delay in the project. July 30, 2001 — The JCC approved staff recommendations on procurement procedures and design criteria for microfiltration (MF) and ultraviolet light disinfection. Design criteria recommended by staff included a change to incorporate the 6 mgd temporary MF units into the permanent MF facilities, increasing the capacity from 80 to 86 mgd. September 24, 2001 — JCC authorized staff to negotiate Change Order No. 3 to the SPI Task Order for changes in the Scope of Work. - 3 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.of Dir. t2its2D2 AGENDA REPORT item Number Item Number 2e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 APPROVE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TASK ORDER TO HOWARD ALMGREN FOR VALUE ENGINEERING SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an Orange County Water District Task Order in an amount not to exceed $143,960 to Howard Almgren for the Howard Almgren team to complete value engineering services at the 70% design level for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$71,980 each. SUMMARY • Value engineering (VE)studies are required for the Groundwater Replenishment System at approximately the 30% and 70% design stages to support the application for funding under the State Revolving Fund (SRF) administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). • The 30% design VE study was completed by a team of professionals led by George M.Wesner and Howard Almgren in early June 2001 at a cost of about$60,000. • The results of this Initial VE study were accepted by the SW RCB, and incorporated into the project. • The final design of various project components is approaching the 70% completion stage, and will soon be ready for the second VE session. • At the October 22, 2001 meeting,the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC) directed Staff to negotiate with the Wesner/Almgren team to complete the 70%design VE services. • The Wesner/Almgren team proposes to prepare three separate 70% design VE studies for a maximum not to exceed amount of$143,960. • These three VE studies will comply with the SWRCB requirements for the SRF loan, and conform to the project schedule. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District (OCW D)and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)approval of an OCWD Task Order to Howard Almgren in an amount not to exceed $143,960 for VE services. aa..a.venm+ Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY A total authorization of $71,980 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The funds are being moved from contingency. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the November 14, 2001, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES Staff proposed the alternative to solicit competitive proposals for this work to the JCC. The JCC recommended negotiating with the team who performed the 30% value engineering (VE) services based on the team's competency and project knowledge. Their knowledge of the project gives them a distinct advantage by eliminating the "learning curve". CECIA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Boards of Directors on March 24, 1999, Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. November 14, 2001, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Value Engineering Studies. WTS:jo:jak GA Alalagenc!MBoadl Agenda Repons12001 Board Agenda Report MOVIem 20(e).Almgren.doc ...W: e 1 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROP PROPOSED .FUNDS TNIs EST(IM7EO; ESTINATEO PROPOSED TOTAL UITED BXPE{7bSO PROJECTRASN AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUIXI Ld�` RENSED AUTHORIZED AUTN0*0gN AUTHDWZATION E%PON BUDGET SUDOET INCW 4' BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST :: ,: TO DATE TO DATE(%)' Project Development $ 700,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 E 4.000 $ 4,000 100% St.dies/Permitti 4.000.000 $ 4.000,000 $ 4,000.000 $ 4.000,000 If 4.000,000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7.500,000 $ 18,400,000 $ 71.980 $ 18,471.980 $ 18.342.834 S 71,980 $ 18.414,814 $ 500.000 3% Design Shiff $ 8.349.000 $ 1,349,000 E 1,349,000 $ 1,399.000 $ 1,U9,0001 $ 450.000 33% Construction Contract $ 86.481.500 $ 137.500.000 $137,500.000 $ 6,7001500 $ 6,700,500 $ 0% Construction Administration $ 2,653.900 S 6.021.000 If 6.021,000 It If - $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 9.345,600 S 326,000 S 326,000 $ $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 12A95,000 5 15,100.000 b 11,980 $ 154028,020 $ It - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL If 121.925.000 $ 182.700,000 $ - $182,7W.000 $ 30,398,334 S 71,980 $ 30.468,314 $ 4,954,000 16% Reimbursable Costs $ -IS 28,000,000 1 E 28.000,000 1 1 1$ 750,000 PRQIECT NET I S 121,925,000 1$ 154,700,000 1$ - $154,700,000 $ 30,396,334 1 $ 71,9110115 30,468,314 S 4.204.000 14% Funds authorized to Bale Includes muIllPle contracts Issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Ground*mler Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District —Funds authorized to date Include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jell,SCE substation construction,temporsl,office facilities,agreement and easement costs,and mf/uv engineering documents from equipment vendors. GAwp.AhAengUOeS 8 CONTRACTSU-361egends reporis\dec01We1O-35 budget tablel2-15-01 70%ve.xls]70%ve OCSD Confidential 70%ve Page 1 Agenda Item #5 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: November 14, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030.600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $150.000 From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes, Debbie Burris Subject: VALUE ENGINEERING STUDIES SUMMARY Value engineering (VE) studies are required for this project at approximately the 30 percent and 70 percent design stages to support the application for funding under the State Revolving Fund (SRF) administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SVVRCB). The 30 percent design value engineering study was completed by a team of professionals led by George M. Wesner and Howard Almgren in early June 2001 at a cost of about $60,000. The results of this initial VE study were accepted by the SWRCB and incorporated into the project. The final design of various project components is approaching the 70 percent completion stage and will soon be ready for the second value engineering session. At the October 22, 2001 meeting, your Committee directed staff to negotiate with the Wesner/Almgren team to complete the 70 percent design value engineering services. The Wesner/Almgren team proposes to prepare three separate 70 percent design VE studies for a maximum not-to-exceed amount of $143,960. These three VE studies will comply with the SWRCB requirements for the SRF loan and conform to the project schedule. RECOMMENDATION Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Approve and authorize issuance of a task order in an amount not to exceed $143,960 to Howard Almgren for the George M. Wesner/Howard Almgren team to complete the 70 percent design value engineering services. Agendize for the November 19 OCWD Board meeting and the December 19 OCSD Board meeting. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS VE studies are required for this project at approximately the 30 percent and 70 percent design stages to support the application for funding under the SRF administered by the SWRCB. The main purpose of VE studies is to review the project design and make recommendations for enhancements and cost-saving measures. While required for - 1 - Agenda Item #5 SWRCB funding, value engineering is often a vital and worthwhile component of the final design of any major project. In early June 2001, a team led by George M. Wesner and Howard Almgren completed the 30 percent design VE study in June at a cost of approximately $60,000. The final design of various project components is approaching the 70 percent completion stage and will soon be ready for the second value engineering session. Because the project is divided into multiple construction contracts that will be designed and built on staggered schedules, we have grouped the contracts for value engineering evaluation. Three separate VE studies, one for each group of construction contracts, will be needed to accommodate the project schedule. This method will satisfy the SWRCB requirements, provide valuable design review, and comply with the project schedule. At the October 22, 2001 meeting, your Committee directed staff to negotiate with the Wesner/Almgren team to complete the 70 percent value engineering services. In response to the Request for Proposal and Scope of Work, the Wesner/Almgren team submitted a proposal for the three VE studies. Results of the negotiations yielded the following cost breakdown: VE Study Construction Contracts Not-to-Exceed Fee GWR Pipeline— Unit 2 1 GWR Pipeline— Unit 3 $36,260 Site Power Distribution 2 Temporary Microfiltration and Site Piping $47,500 Barrier Well Drilling, Wellheads &West Barrier Pipeline Category 1 Demolition 3 Piles and Foundation Preparation $60,200 Main Advanced Water Treatment Plant GWR Pipeline— Unit 1 TOTAL $143,960 This level of effort demonstrates some economy of scale for completion of three VE studies. It is also indicative of the Wesner/Almgren team's familiarity with the project. Their knowledge of the project from the prior VE study gives them a distinct advantage by eliminating the "learning curve". The Wesner/Almgren team consists of eight engineers and one hydrogeologist, all of whom are highly experienced and have completed many value engineering studies. In conclusion, selection of the Wesner/Almgren team to complete the 70 percent design VE studies will support the project schedule and comply with the SWRCB requirements for the SRF loan. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS December 18, 2000—Authorized staff to negotiate professional services. -2 - 1 Agenda Item #5 March 19, 2001 — Authorized issuance of request for proposals for 30 percent design value engineering. April 9, 2001 —Authorized selection of 30 percent design value engineering consultant. October 22, 2001 — Authorized staff to negotiate with the Wesner/Almgren team for 70 percent design value engineering services. - 3 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS meeting Date TO Bd.&D,,. 21 9/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Item Number zotn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) OWNER CONTROLLED INSURANCE PROGRAM (OCIP)WORKERS' COMPENSATION & EXCESS GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the GWRS Owner Controlled Insurance Program for Workers' Compensation and Excess General Liability with Zurich, for the period December 15, 2001 through February 1, 2006,for a total premium not to exceed $5,884,310,with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares not to exceed $2,942,156. SUMMARY On September 10, 2001, the GWRS Joint Cooperative Committee (J.C.C.)selected Aon Risk Services to serve as the Committee's Broker of Record. The World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist attacks that followed on the next day have further hardened the current insurance market. Since their selection, Aon has been in the process of soliciting insurance proposals for the GWRS OCIP worker's compensation and excess general liability programs. On December 3' the OCIP Subcommittee, consisting of Wes Bannister, Orange County Water District(OCWD) Director and Insurance Professional, Michael Markus and William Everest, OCWD Assistant General Managers, Andrew Czorny, OCWD Finance Director, Jerry White, OCWD Safety and Risk Manager, and Michael White, CPA, OCSD Controller, and Aon met to review the proposals of the three finalists. On Monday, December 10, the Joint Cooperative Committee approved Aon and the Subcommittee's recommendation for the selection of Zurich in an amount not to exceed $4,618,746 for the provision of all workers' compensation coverage on the GWRS project. Additional authorization is being requested at this time for a $35,000 deposit for Builders All- Risk Insurance, the Aon 4-year administration fee of$580,562 and the estimated Excess General Liability Insurance premium of$650,000. The J.C.C. is recommending approval by the Orange County Water District on Monday, December 17, and by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at the Board Meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The J.C.C. is recommending a payment schedule over the next four years: Initial Payment Due 1/02: 10% of Zurich $461,874 100% of Excess 650,000 (currently an estimate) 25% of Aon' Admin. Fee 145,141 All Builder's Risk Deposit 35,000 Remainder of Zurick and Aon Fees: Due 4/1/02 692,813 Due 12/1/02 1,299,828 Due 12/1/03 1,299,827 Due 1211/04 1,299,827 Total Payments $5.1384,31 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (GWRS Capital Project) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Market conditions are expected to continue to tighten and prices of the OCIP are expected to increase significantly after December 31, 2001 as a result of: • California Workers' Compensation Rate Increase recommended by the Insurance Commissioner. • Reverberations from the World Trade Center losses. As a result the Aon and the OCIP Subcommittee began expediting the insurance selection process. Aon approached ten different insurance carriers for proposals on the GW RS OCIP workers' compensation insurance program, consisting of: • ACE USA/CIGNA • AIG • CNA • Hartford • Kemper Insurance Group • Liberty Mutual • St. Paul Fire & Marine • TIG • Travelers • Zurich G wq Ouapmaaewe Maw Rg4163LO1 BovOnpeiaa Iiepvn,fm,Nan m1�Oa,V CanFuee M Rayeoc vmm Page 2 Of these ten, Aon narrowed the list down to the three most responsible bidders. Following are the three finalists along with their A.M. Best insurance rating and their premium charges based on their projection of the maximum workers' compensation loss premiums: • AIG A++XV $5,158,646 • St. Paul A+XV $5.120,230 • Zurich A+XV $4,618,746 After deliberation amongst the OCIP Subcommittee,the recommendation was made to the J.C.C., who now recommends approval of Zurich to both boards of the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District. The estimated savings Aon and the OCIP Subcommittee believes will be obtained through this owner controlled program for workers' compensation and general liability insurance coverage as opposed to having the individual contractor's obtain workers' compensation and general liability insurance is as follows: Least Maximum Amount Amount Of W/C of W/C Losses Losses OCIP Premium W/C & GL ($3.41/$9.50 per $100 of Payroll) $1,657,300 $4,618,746 Excess Liability ($50 million)(estimated) 650.000 650,000 OCIP Adminstration (Aon) _ 580,562 580,562 Total OCIP Cost 2,887,862 5,849,308 Expected Contractor Credits from Conventional Insurance 8,462,025 8,462,025 Estimated Savings Generated from OCIP $5,574_160 $2.612.ZiZ ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None MW:IC G:wyse�wb+m,a nyuwa Fep•v4V0,Bw,e Ag„Y�n,m�wmfgil.o..n.cw.eaom irs rme.aoc Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FReetlng Dale TOBd.at Dir. z 19J01 AGENDA REPORT em Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District _ u FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-16, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04: a) Verbal report of General Manager b) Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-16 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) c) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSDA6. SUMMARY General Manager, Blake Anderson, reported to the Steering Committee that he would be presenting a recommendation to the FAHR Committee and the Board in November to re-establish an early retirement incentive program for 2002. The Board has previously approved the Early Retirement Incentive Program between the years of 1995 to 2000. During those years, 47 employees retired early. Seven of those positions were refilled. The total cumulative savings through the end of fiscal year 2001 for the previous program is approximately$7.2 million. The only difference in the offering of the program this year is that certain positions may be refilled in accordance with the Five-year Staffing Plan. In previous years, while we were downsizing, we did not refill most of the vacancies created by this program. We believe that the program will ultimately pay for itself, but this year there could be a small cost as we may be refilling positions. Based upon our current estimate, the net cost for the remainder of 2001-02 could be $291,250, If%or the positions were refilled, while the annual savings thereafter would be approximately$206,250 resulting in a payback period of less than 2 years. The General Manager and the EMT believe that this program is necessary at this time in the life of the agency. At least nine employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement this year. If this program is adopted, eligible employees with a minimum of ten years of service and 50 years of age would be granted two additional years of service credit for retirement purposes, provided they retire from employment between January 1, 2002, and March 31, 2002. Staff has inventoried the positions where the incumbent employees are eligible to participate in this program. Although the positions vacated by the potential retirees would be refilled or reassigned, we have concluded that the District would still recognize a cost savings and by reallocating current and new staff, no impairment to District's operations would result from the approval and implementation of this program. Staff also believes that this is a prudent time to offer such a program due to the labor market retuming to a favorable position for employers. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This cost estimate is based on the potential retiree list generated by employee inquiries. It also assumes that the positions vacated will be refilled immediately. There could be net costs of up to $291,250 in the remainder of 2001-02, but savings in subsequent years will create a payback period of less than 2 years assuming % of the positions were refilled. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted, but there are sufficient funds from payroll savings from unfilled positions to cover the first year cost. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-16. The nine interested employees, and perhaps some others, will retire when their benefits are sufficient and the District will not enjoy this opportunity to restructure and reallocate resources in a favorable hiring market. CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-16 G'W.NupviaaBwalpawa Repmc300f Boara PpeW Pe�b\tA1Nan21 E�YAdIHRn10N.WC WWI Page 2 ORDINANCE NO.00SD-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICT EMPLOYEES,AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District has previously adopted Resolutions and Ordinances approving Early Retirement Incentive Programs for all eligible District employees, as authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04; and WHEREAS, previously adopted Incentive Programs were, as provided by law, for a fixed period of time, each of which has now expired;and WHEREAS, District's Management has reported to the Board the desirability of implementing a further Early Retirement Incentive Program due to the implementation of changes in the manner of performing District services and the savings of money and other economic benefits that will flow to the District by the retirement of eligible employees; and WHEREAS,the Board of Directors has determined that changes in the manner of performing District services, and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire early, will exceed the total actuarial costs of the additional service credit granted to those who retire under this Program. NOW,THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Califomia Government Code Section 31641.04,as a component provision of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, is hereby adopted and deemed applicable to all regular,full-time employees, by the Board of Directors, upon the adoption of this Ordinance. Section 2: All regular, full-time employees of the Orange County Sanitation District who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees Retirement System,shall be granted two(2)additional years of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular employment of the District during the period of January 18, 2002 through and including March 31, 2002. Section 3: The General Manager of the District, or his designee, is authorized to execute any and all contracts or other documents, and to transfer all required funds to the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in order to implement the authorized actions provided for herein. Section 4: The total cost savings resulting from the retirement of employees in positions which are subsequently filled at a lower level, or when the position is held vacant for a period of time, shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted to those employees who refire, together with the related paid leave payoff costs. Section 5: District shall pay to the Orange County Employees Retirement System the actuarially-determined cost of this Early Retirement Incentive Program over a period not to exceed five (5)years, and on such other terns and conditions as shall be set forth in a mutually agreed upon written contract between the District and the Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System. Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a regular meeting held December 19, 2001. Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Penny Kyle, Secretary of the Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel G.\wp.dbladminWS10rdimnms12001\OCSD 16-EarlyReLdoe BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Toed.of Dir. 2/19/01 AGENDA REPORT IMm Number Item 22mbe zz Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims or Demands for Payment GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-17, Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims or Demands for Payment. SUMMARY Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated October 3, 2001. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Memorandum dated 10/3/01 Proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-17 R LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFE661ONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee FROM: General Counsel DATE: October 3, 2001 RE: Adoption of Procedures re: 1) Board/Committee Meetings; and 2) Claims In light of some recent issues that have arisen regarding claims and litigation filed with the District, together with a significant increase in attendance of public members at our meetings, it is recommended the Board consider the enactment of several Ordinances and Resolution, which are essentially "housekeeping" in nature, in order to provide a continuing fair opportunity for all members of the public, but to allow a streamlined and efficient process of the Districts business. 1. Amendment to Resolution No. OCSD 96-2 re Board of Directors and Committee Meetings. This Resolution requires three changes— amely. A. Correction of Board of Directors' meeting time from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in Section 1A. B. Correction of Committee meeting times from 5:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in Section 1 L(b), (c), and (d). C. Reduction in maximum time allowed for an individual speaker from 5 minutes to 3 minutes in Section 1J, and a total of 30 minutes for all speakers on a given subject. The change in time is simply to conform to the current schedule that was established several months ago by the Board for its Committee Meetings. The reduction in the amount of time is to insure that members of the public, as expressly provided for in the Ralph M. Brown Act, are afforded a comment period to address the Board of Directors. The suggested changes will reduce the individual time and the maximum time for any given subject. Keep in mind that it is always within the prerogative of the Chair and the Board to either extend individual or collective times, or to have a second comment period at a later point in the Agenda. This reduction in time will insure that members of the public that may be present for purposes of participating in any manner with the many other items on the Board Agenda, than the one involving a large group of speakers, are afforded a reasonable opportunity to have the matter presented and discussed at a reasonable time. 141719U Y Page Two October 3, 2001 ; 2. Robert's Rules of Order. At the present time, the Rules of Procedure that govern Board Meetings make reference to the utilization of Roberts Rules of Order. It has been my experience that when a local governmental agency establishes Robert's Rules as the procedural requirement, the process can be easily misunderstood and oftentimes abused. Robert's Rules were never designed, nor intended, to serve a local governing Board such as the District, or City Councils. Rather, it is the set of Rules that was established for the British Parliament but has become universally accepted as the Number 1 guideline for meeting procedures. A similar report was provided to the Board several years ago, and the Board indicated that it was willing to accept a recommended local set of Rules that are largely based on Robert's Rules, but hopefully eliminate those items which often lead to confusion, misunderstanding, and abuse. I have prepared a Table of the 17 most common items extracted from Robert's Rules, and would recommend that they be adopted as the exclusive Rules for the governing of the meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees. Anything beyond those Rules would be subject simply to the rule of authority possessed by the Chair. Just by somewhat light example, I would point out that Robert's Rules have no explicit provision for either a "Motion to Continue"or for a"Substitute Motion", which are probably two of the most common motions used. The objectives of those motions can be obtained by one particularly skilled in Robert's, or just by common practice and acceptance of a local agency. That is a good example why adoption of our own local Rules can utilize the terminology that is in fact familiar and understood by all Members. If recommended by the Committee and the Board, we can incorporate it into the Rules of Procedure Resolution at the next Board Meeting. 3. Enactment of Ordinance Establishing Requirements for the Presentation of Claims by Other Public Agencies. The State-wide Government Tort Claims Act, California Government Code Sections 800, at seq., contains provisions applicable to all local governmental agencies, setting time limits by which individuals must Tile a claim against the District, whether it be for damage to personal property, or for bodily injury/personal injury. However, the statute otherwise absolves other governmental agencies from having to comply with the claims procedure, thus allowing them to directly file litigation without first asserting a claim and presenting it to the District Government Code Section 935 specifically authorizes local agencies to adopt an Ordinance requiring any other public agency to comply with all of the same procedural requirements as any other claimant when filing a claim, as a precedent to filing litigation against the District. This, too, is designed to give the District the earliest possible notification of a dispute or claim by another public agency, and thus allowing the District to do the necessary research and investigation to determine the validity while the information is readily available. Most Cities and other local governmental agencies have enacted such a provision, and this enactment is strongly recommended. ^ �4 a-e-i HOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW pj 141719M ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS OR DEMANDS FOR PAYMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Claims for Money or Damages. As a prerequisite to bringing suit against the District or any officer, employee, Department, or Committee of the District, any claim for money or damages, including claims which would otherwise be excepted by Sections 905 and 935 of the Government Code of the State of California, which are not governed by any other statutes or regulations expressly relating thereto, shall be presented and acted upon in accordance with Title 1, Division 3.6, Part 3, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of the Government Cade of the State of California. This Section relates only to bringing of suit upon a claim, and shall not be deemed to apply to the authority of the Director of Finance and the Board of Directors to process and pay, in the ordinary course of business,just obligations of the District, such as routine salaries and wages, principal and interest on bands, payments for purchases, and other like expenditures where there is no dispute as to the obligation and amount being payable. Section 2: Filing of Claims. All claims against the District, as described in Section 1 of this Ordinance, shall be filed with the Board Secretary. Section 3: Audit and Approval of Demands. A. Except for claims described in Section 1 of this Ordinance, every demand, invoice, or claim for purchases, supplies, or services (hereinafter "demand"), shall be presented in writing to and approved in writing by the receiving Department Head or officer, who shall certify to the actual delivery or rendition of the supplies, materials, property, or service for which payment is claimed; that the quality and prices correspond with the original specifications in the contract or purchase order upon which the demand is based; that the demand in all other respects is proper and valid and shall further indicate the budgetary account to which such demand is to be charged. B. All demands approved by the receiving Department or officer shall be presented to the Director of Finance, who shall satisfy himself or herself as to whether: 1. The amount is legally due and owing by the District; 1 2. There are budgeted or otherwise appropriated funds available to pay the claim or invoice; 3. The demand conforms to a valid requisition, contract, or purchase order, 4. The prices and computations shown on the demand are verified; and 5. The demand contains the approval of other Departments and officials, as required. C. Payroll warrants and checks, and warrants and checks drawn for payment of demands that have been certified by the Director of Finance or the General Manager as conforming to a budget approved by the Board of Directors, need not be approved by the Board of Directors prior to payment. Except for payroll warrants or checks, demands certified by the Director of Finance and paid prior to presentation to the Board of Directors shall be presented to the Board of Directors for inspection and ratification at its first meeting after delivery of the warrants or checks. Should the Director of Finance fail to certify a demand as in conformance with the Districts budget, no check or warrant shall be issued until the Board of Directors has approved the demand for payment. D. Department Heads shall certify or approve Departmental payrolls or attendance records for employees in their Departments. The General Manager or designee(s) shall certify or approve payrolls or attendance records of other officers or employees. E. Budgeted expenses shall be presented to the Board of Directors for ratification in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial report prepared by the Director of Finance or his or her designee. F. Following audit of the demands, as set forth in Subsection B of this Section 3, the Director of Finance shall prepare a register of demands showing the claimants name,the amount of the demand, and if paid, the warrant or check number and date thereof, and shall transmit the register to the Board of Directors with an affidavit stating that: 1. "In accordance with California Government Code Section 37208, the Director of Finance hereby certifies that the attached demand register has been found to conform to the approved budget, except as noted, and has been paid. These demands are hereby submitted for Board of Directors' inspection and ratification.' 2 2. "In accordance with California Government Code Section 37202,the Director of Finance certifies to the accuracy of the attached register of demands and to the availability of monies for payment thereof. These demands are hereby submitted to the Board of Directors for approval of payment." G. An annual audit shall be prepared by an independent certified public accountant and submitted to the Board of Directors for review. Section 4: Checks and Warrants. No check, order, or warrant upon the District treasury shall be dawn unless there are sufficient monies in the fund upon which It is drawn. All checks, orders, and warrants upon the District treasury of any money shall bear the signature of the persons authorized by the Board of Directors. Section 5: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a regular meeting held December 19, 2001. Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Orange County Sanitation District G.\wp.dtatadmintBS\Ordinanm000110CSD 17-Ckalma.Damanda for PaymenLdcp 3