Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001-10-24
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT October 16, 2001 NOTICE OF MEETING O714I 9Bzz4111 BOARD OF DIRECTORS rag ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714)962O35fi mtlB.,eBJrt.s: WEDNESDAY, October 24, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. B0, Boa B127 Runs.',Valle,G 92728-9127 sm.et watts: DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1,844 Ellis Avenue 10844 Ellis Avenue Po.,,.,n Valle,CA 92708 7018 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Apeoc1to District will be held at the above location, time and date. • cities Anaheim l ' Brea I itir Buena Perk i. w Cypress Bbard Secre� Fountain Vide., Fullerton Garden Grave Huntington Beech Irvine to Hill Le Pella Los Alemitos Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Newport Beach Orange Plecands Rance Ans seal Beach Stanton JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Tustin SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, October 22, 2001 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD ✓Ile Park Yorda Linde PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 1, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. County or Details OCEAN DISCHARGE ISSUES WORKSHOP - Saturday, November 3, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. sanitary District. col Mese OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. Midway City JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Water Well SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 9:30 a.m.@OCWD IrWne Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM WORKSHOP Saturday, November 17, 2001 at 8:00 a.m.@OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 28,2001 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. eom BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting November November 28, 2001 December •December 19, 2001 January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 March March 27, 2002 April April 24, 2002 May May 22, 2002 June June 26, 2002 July `July 17, 2002 August August 28, 2002 September September 25, 2002 October October 23, 2002 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month GAwp.dWadmin%BSNgewa\2001 Mee0ng No0wWN70.2.doc ,%;&WEews SEWER LINE REALIGNMENT PROJECT Ranch, requires immediate attention Impact Report (EIR), the long-term Letter From as its protective covering has eroded benefits of each alignment, the the General over the years, making it vulnerable estimated costs, and construction during rainstorms when high volumes impacts on residents and on the of rainwater Bow downstream. environment. We have also been Manager reviewing possible alignments that A break in the SARI Line would were considered early in our planning his is the first in a series of cause a widespread disruption of efforts but which were not refer- newsletters to keep you updat. service and a sewage spill that would enced in the EIR. Our review should ed about Orange County ultimately close the ocean waters off be complete by the summer of 2002. ,,,nitation Districts progress on the of Newport Beach and Huntington ti;mta Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Beach. A break in the line would also A six-member Citizens Advisory Line Relocation and Protection allow rocks, large branches and other Committee (CAC) of area residents Project. debris to enter the sewer pipe. These and business owners has been materials can cause extensive damage established. The CAC is providing to processing equipment at Orange valuable input on the proposed pro- County Sanitation District's jest, including construction impacts treatment plant. to the Yorba Linda and Anaheim communities and any community Initially, Orange County Sanitation concerns. A list of CAC members is District favored relocating the SARI included in this newsletter. pipeline from under the Santa Ana River riverbed to the north bank of We will continue to keep you the river, from the Green River Golf informed through the newsletter, Course to Weir Canyon Road. community meetings and the CAC. Although this is viewed as the techni- cally and environmentally superior Sincerely, option, several issues have arisen, including concerns about project costs and impacts to residents who The SARI Line is the major regional reside near the proposed pipeline sewer pipeline serving Orange alignment. 44&� County and the Inland Empire. A Blake P. Anderson four-mile section of the pipeline, Over the past few months, we have General Manager from the Orange County/San been reviewing the alternatives out- Orange County Sanitation District Bernardino county line to Savi lined in the project Environmental SARI Line Repair and Maintenance Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is currently and installing protective lids to prevent debris from enter- reviewing the alternatives for the relocation and protec- ing the pipe should the top of a manhole he damaged. tion of the SARI Line. The review process, which will be completed next year, represents a delay in the overall During the repair and maintenance work, you can expect project. During this time, the SARI Line remains vulnera- to we backhoes, dump trucks and a water truck working ble to damage during heavy rainstorms when large in the riverbed. Crews will get access to the work area amount of rainwater Bow in the river. through existing access points near Gypsum Canyon and Coal Canyon. No truck traffic will impact school To protect the line, OCSD began repair and maintenance crossings or school bus stops. work in September along a 1 1/2-mile portion of the riverbed, from Camino de Bryant to Hartford Court, OCSD has received permits from the appropriate which is west of Gypsum Canyon, regulatory agencies to perform the maintenance and repair work- The work should be completed by mid- The initial work focuses on eight manholes. Repair crews December and will cost about$500,000.This investment are inspecting the manholes, strapping them down to will protect and strengthen the SARI Line before the prevent them from being washed away during heavy rains rainy season begins. U�pn4'<<'1�a[)$YOtlAGcn OnOC Y.O. Box 8127 Poun,ain Va11er,Ca 92708-812- Current Conditions, Possible Solutions Discussed at Stakeholders Meeting Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) convened a "The SARI Line is adjacent to a residential neighborhood, special meeting of Yorba Linda and Anaheim city repre- under a river inhabited by endangered species and sentatives and others to discuss the current condition of bordered by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Line and some of and the 91 freeway. There are numerous conditions the proposed solutions to protect or relocate a critical and regulations that we must take into consideration," four-mile section of the pipeline. he continued. Held at the Yorba Linda Community Center on June 14, Since the SARI Line was constructed in the 1970s, signifi- the SARI Line stakeholders meeting was an opportunity cant portions of the riverbed that once provided a 20- for attendees to learn about the regulatory, construction foot-deep protective covering have eroded to less than and environmental considerations facing OCSD on this 3 feet in some areas. This has made the sewer pipeline project. particularly vulnerable during heavy storms when high volumes of water in the river are carried downstream. "This is a very complex construction project. The stakeholders meeting brought together all impacted In the meantime, OCSD has conducted visual inspections groups as OCSD strives to develop a workable solution to of the pipeline to check manholes and their level of protecting this critical sewer pipeline," said David exposure. The results of these efforts have been used to Ludwin, OCSD director of engineering. develop a repair and maintenance plan that will be implemented while a permanent solution to protecting the pipeline is studied. Citizens 70.dv"tarnmittee Provides Valua Input— We are pleased to announce the formation of a Citizens and impacts to residents, businesses, the environment and Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Santa Ana River the endangered species living in the Santa Ana River. OCSD Interceptor (SARI) Line Relocation and Protection Project. staff also answered questions from CAC members on the This group of six area residents will provide Orange County feasibility of specific pipeline alignments and the history of Sanitation District with important input on our proposed the SARI Line since it was completed in the mid-1970s. project and how it may affect neighborhoods and businesses along the construction route. The CAC will meet throughout the two-year construction project. If you have a comment or question regarding the The first CAC meeting was held in May when OCSD staff SARI Line project, in addition to contacting OCSD, you reported on their progress of reviewing the numerous pro- may contact any of these Citizens Advisory Committee posed pipeline alignments, the associated construction costs members: Francine Forquer Brian Powell Steve Sprenger Villa Del Rio Homes Bel Canto Homes Villa Del Rio Homes 692-0683 (home) 692-9454 (home) 939-6015 (work) alohanoe@aol.com brian@brianpowell.com steve.sprenger@grubb-elliscom Ken Erbeznik Don Babbitt Dr. Sam Sarem Bel Canto Homes Bel Canto Homes E. La Palma Business Area 692-8386(home) 692-2728 (home) 692-1198 (home) kerbeznik@mail.bkst.com don.helene.rabbitt@dellepm.com sam4iprc@aol.com Also, if you are interested in participating on the committee please call Lisa Murphy(Lawson), OCSD communications manager, during regular business hours at(714) 593-7120,or you may leave her a voice-mail message after hours. JN'2. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTSC4�c,4_& 0�1- NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS M z 7- Name of Paper Section Page Subject L . A. Trues E q (0 ,23 qI rids' R* crfx �e�dik� G1aII (.rid" VI Sanitation Districts' ommitment to Health, Ecology Unfairly Slighted a On June IS you published a commentary With regard to the removal of toxic In an am of diminishing natural resourc- bv Patrick C. Wall concerning the county materials from our discharge. Indtu[rtal- es, increasing oil unporis. au-quality eon. samtation districts' application for counn- source control of toxins is the cornerstone cerns from energy generation, the green. muon of their ocean discharge waiver of our program.. We have successfully house effect and regional transportation ("Moving the World Is a Loner's Job"). controlled the discharge of pollutants to problems (trucking sludge. for evarttple 1. Mr.Wall's apparent disinterest in the truth levels that are so low that the raw sewage there is a need w look at the national and and his misrepresentation of the facts are a entering our waste-water treatment facili- global picture to put things into perspec- real disservice to any ecologically minded Lies is actually better than the effluent tive. The basic laws of ecology mandate clusen or organlutiun having a sincere discharge standards for full secondary that we look at the macro consequences of interest in and dedication to responsible treatment imposed by the EPA and the our actions—no[just the macm effects. overall environmental management and suite of California on our ocean discharge. The governing body of the sanitation crotection. Over the last 15 years. we have reduced districts is composed of dedicated commu- First. the article incorrectly sates that thedischargeoftowc matenalsbv80%. mty leaders. council members and board the districts dump partially treated sewage Mr. Wall also erroneously implies that members representing the 24 commumues offshore. We provide a blend of 53% full we will expand our treatment capacity only and unincorporated territory and the 2.1 secondary treatment and 47% advanced if required W provide full secondary treat. million constituents served by the districts. primary treatment. which meets the strict men[ m all of our flow. We have an I can assure you that they take them California suite requiummenu and those ongoing construction program designed to responsibilities very seriously. Only after esublished by the Environmental Protect- meet the environmental and sewage needs weighing the preponderance of scientific. Lion Agency under the provisions of Sec- of our service area and currently have$205 engineering and economic evidence com- mon 3011 h I of the federal Clean Water Act. million worth of facilities under construe- piled by an independent Lem of consulting which allows the ocean discharge of a Lion, another $170 million worth under experts did the districts'boards of directors high-quality but less than full secondary design. including additional secondary determine that continuation of thew exist- effluent for only those treatment plants treatment- and S112 million worth in the ing waste-water management program. that can prove their tlucharge will not planning sa m ges.The progra will cos[SI.5 which operates parsuant to the strict adversely affect marine water quality. billion by the year 2020. provisions of the federal Clean Water Act, Contmry to the statement in the article, When deciding if we should construct is in the best overall interests of the the districts have never allowed the dump- full secondary treatment facilities, we ciu ens of Orange County.It will enable us Ong of untreated sewage into Coastal we. cannot conscientiously lusufy to our tax- to continue to mamtarn fishable and Mon. Lem.Further, there is absolutely no build- payers an additional 51.4-billion expends- mable coastal waters in an efficient.effec. up of solid residuals on the ocean floor.and time (more than doubling the residents' tive manner. there is no visible damage around the costs) for a nominal increase in removal of The dtsmcts' directors and staff take outfall. as Mr. Wall contends. In fact, the organic solids when scientific data gash- great pride in our many accomplishments. outfall itself is teeming with marine life ered over the pas[ five years through a We are recognized its one of the leading and resembles an underwater reef. Fish 310-million ocean monitoring program waste-water management agencies in the caught off Orange County's coast meet all provides evidence indicating that public country. The success of our programs in Food and Drug Administration standards. health and the marine environment are rotecung public health and the ocean Likewise.the sutemenumplytngapre(- now being protected The local marine resources off Orange Count s coastline erence for disposing of sludge at landfills ecosystem simply a not threatened by the and providing balanced,tool environmen- over recycling is inaccurate. Just a few immC s'program.Emment scientists from an management s supported b y the results short yeas ago, all of our sludge was the Scripps Institution of Oceanography pp trucked [o a landfill. Today. amnost two- have argued that full secondary treatment of our ongoing ocean monitoring and thirds of it s safely recycled by composting for deep-ocean discharges would be a research programs and is exemplified by or direct agricultural land application. We waste of taxpayers'funds. the numerous federal. state and regional expect to reach our goal of 100% recycling Full secondary treatment also has sig- awards of excellence the dstrics have in the new future. Incidentally, the mar- nificant adverse environmental effecu. received ketplace does not pay for sludge: sludge These include more effects on land from disposal costs the districts more than $3.3 sludge disposal. increased energy use. A.H.CATLIN million per year.The reality is that the cost much greater depletion of natural resourc- Chairman,Joint Boards of Directors to transport and process sludge means we es and more air emissions. Orange County Samuuon Districts cannot sell it for a profit. Therefore. an Councilman.Fullerton City Council increase in sludge quantities resulting from Orange County Letters full secondary treatment would actually Letters should be they and am subject to increase ratepayers costs. Cdrrdeeraetan.They must moody signature vela malting mm.and,telephone.Fai,letters W(2 t3)2374679 W med ill: Letters to DR Editor.Los Angeles Times CAROLSTWUNU- LAWRENCE M.H IGBY. min or nor Sdume.Los Angeles SODS 3 - 0ini Lents ch orange County house may be Mm to: StEiaEIr WRGARD, O.0 `,crc 711966 SE00 LettM to the Editor.The Times.Orange country v� .�rlv OCEu 1)lar 9E61]II 115 Sunenwp Ave rnaAMeta Q191A Central Basin Municipal Water District 17140 S.Avalon Blvd•Suite 210•Carson,CA 90746-1296 telephone 310-217-2222•fax 310-217-2414 October 16, 2001 Mr. Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mr. Eckenrode: Support for Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District's — Groundwater Replenishment System As proud stewards of our own recycled water program, I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors for the Central Basin Municipal Water District voted unanimously to support your proposed new recycled water project, referred to as the "Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)." The Board of Directors believes that local recycled water projects, such as your GWRS, are essential in meeting Southern California's thirst for water. For each acre-foot of recycled water developed, is an acre-foot conserved to an increasingly strained imported water supply system. We wish you success on your project. Sincerely, 0�s V Robert Apodaca President — Central Basin Municipal Water District RAN:ss: F:\users\shared\word\770cbo10 Robert Apodaca Albert Robles Charles M.Tr ifio Phillip D.Hawkins Gary A.Morse (*n&n, wn Prmidexr Seertury 7i d irt, t)..Kror ) ii West Basin Municipal Water District 17140 S.Awlon Blvd•Suite 210•Carson,CA 90746-12% telephone 310-217-2411 •fax 310-217-2414 October 16, 2001 Mr. Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mr. Eckenrode: Support for Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District's — Groundwater Replenishment System As proud stewards of our own recycled water program, I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors for the West Basin Municipal Water District voted unanimously to support your proposed new recycled water project, referred to as the "Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)." The Board of Directors believes that local recycled water projects, such as your GWRS, are essential in meeting Southern California's thirst for water. For each acre-foot of recycled water developed, is an acre-foot conserved to an increasingly strained imported water supply system. We wish you success on your project. Sincerely, /, (, R. Keith McDonald President — West Basin Municipal Water District RAWSS: F:\users\,m.m \worA\762wbo03 R Keith McDonald Ed,,.d C.Little Carol W. Kwan Tyrone Smith Donald L Dear P,aidrxr Pmiden, Smmry T m Din mr CITY SR Pl1BLIC RECORDS Fax:114-647-6956 Oct 23 2001 17:01 P.02 j • I 'tO �� 'W�avtpNrmva.rmtc� . •a- �"• . .ya„"A INANCE NO.7S-2479 AN ORDINANCE F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADD NO ARTICLE XM)TO CH}1PTER 13 AND SECTIONS 1 — 99a5 5 TO THE CITY S CODE, ESTABLISHING SEWERAGE SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND ANDS RAGE SERVIQE FEE THE CITY COUNCIL OF E CITY OF SAf A ANAi ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: i Section 1: The City undl d the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines ^*•v A� �!!GThe�(Lityrhesior neratiorm provided to iLscrtjzensa system to transport sewerage generated by residents and businesses to the County of Orange system where it is treated and disposed. Z. B. On May 21, 2001 the City Council was presented, at a study session,with evidence demons ling that large portions of the Citys sewerage system, located in no one�area•but citywide', is of sufficient age that it is need ,of additional and extraordinary repair and replacement. C. The City, currently does not levy -a fee or charge-for the service of transporting sewerage- This Service Wa .commod'ity in that the more water-'.a water customer consdmes the greater the sewerage that the customer generates. D. The City's Charter and State law, including but not limited to Government Coder section 54340 .et seq.;: provide that'the City may establish reasonable charges and fees for the service the City provides in _ transporting sewelrage to the Orange "County publicly owned treatment work§and relatedi infrastructure. - - E. A fee:for this service would not duplicate any existing fee. charge,devy or other toll currently collected by the City or any public agency, and would be distinct and separate from any current or future (I) sewer standby or availability charge or assessment, (ii) special benefit assessment of special tax imposed pursuant to state or local law, (fii) sewer connection charge or sewer capacity charge paid in connection with or as a condition of approving an ppIication for.sewer service, or (iv) any mitigation fee imposed on new development pursuant to state law (Government Code § 66000 et seq.)or local law. F. This fee would not be charged, because no sewerage service is being provided, to raw land,vacant property (i.e.,where no water service.is being i I Ordinance No.NS•24n Page 1 are CITY SR PUBLIC RECORDS Fax;714-647-6956 Oct 23 2001 17:01 11.03 provided), to a ctisterner who Is eopsuming;no water, to a water customer who is directly connected to a county owned sewer, or to a water customer whose only water consumption is fob fire service or irrigation. G. The moneys collected by such a service fee would be placed into a fund that would be used only to repair, replace and perform preventative maintenance on city owned sewer mains or sewer trunk lines, and associated costs. In addition, in a change to current policy, the City could use such funds t repair and replace that portion of the sewer customer's lateral that lies wpin the public right of way when necessary. No moneys from this fundwojfld go to the city's general fund. H. This ordinance h ss been found to be, and the Council concurs is.LmRt from the California Environmental Quality Act CCEQA°) pursuant t4 Public (resources Codes§ 15273(a)(1) (exempting cparyes imposed by public agendies to meet operating expenses)and State CEQA Guidelines § 15301 (exempting the repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing public facilities). Section 2: Sections $9-55.1 — 39.55.6i are hereby added to the Santa Ana Municipal Code to read as follows: r . Sea 39.55.1�. Sewerage Service Fee=Purpose. ' In order to reimburse the City, in part, for its service in transporting sewerage from a water utility customer or other person using the city-owned sewer system and facilities to Orange'County's publicly owned treatment works and related infrastructure, and to operate,,maintain, repair and replace said city- owned sewer system and facilities, it is;appropriate for the City to charge a sewerage service fee. This fee does not duplicate any existing fee, charge, levy or other toll currently collected by anytpublic agency, and is intended to be;and shall be interpreted as, distinct and separate from any current or future (a) sewer standby or availability charge or:assessment; (b) special benefit assessment or special tax imposed pursuant torstate or local-law; (c)sewer connection charge or sewer capacity char9e paid in connection with or as a condition of approving an application for sewer service; or(d)'any mitigation fee imposed on new development pursuant to state law (Government Code §6600D at seq.) or local law. Where appropriate, words and phrases used in sections 39-55.1 through - 39.55.6 shall have the same meaning as given ,them under Article II of this Chapter. Sec.3955.2. Sewerage Service Fee—EstablishmeriL ; a. Except as provided In section 39-55.3 of this Code, upon each water utility customer of the City there shall'bel imposed, in addition to the commodity charge for usage of City water,a sewerage service fee. All sewerage Ordinance No. NS-2479 Page 2 of 6 r CITY Sfl PUDLIC RECORDS jFa1414-647-6956 Oct 23 2001 17:01 P.04 ' I service fees imposeuant to this subs4ction s all be due and payable at the time and in the maprovided in this "ode for payment of water utility bills pursuant to Article Iis Chapter, bt¢sh II be 5s4ed as a separate line item on Ile water utility bill. sewerage service fee shall be charged based upon the volume of usagetocitys sewer syst m by the water utility customer, as measured by meterter service. b. Excepprovided in s�p 39-55. subsections (a)through (c) of this Code, uponperson whoi rerieives potable water service from a municipal water proother than the.C' or from;a private water provider, and who discharges intctywsysterq and facilities there shall be imposed a seweragice fee. Ail sewerage service fees imposed pursuant to in this Cade for payof water utility bills pursuant to Article II of this Chapter. . --� The sewerage-service fee shall be charged based.'upon.the volume of usage of the citys'sewer system qy the person, as measured by metered water service or other means approved b the Director of the Public Works Agency or designee. Sec. 3955.3. Sewerage Service Fee "ception$. -The following typ of-connections Shall not be-liable for payment of the . sewerage service fee: +! - (a) '`fire Service nnectionswheq separately metered; - (b) i irrigation oe connection when separately metered; (c) any Indiv , partnership, associatign;:corpomtion or agency of governmentLthatris not. connectedrto, the Citys ;sewerage system; provided, however;that it shall be the obligation pf tkieindividual.partnership,association, corporation or agency 01 government to prpsent evidence of this fact to the City; or. (dy any water utility customer who has not received.City supplied water during a billing period: Sec.3945A. Sewerag Service Fee Setting Reasonable Fee. The City Council shall, from time jto time,; set a reasonable sewerage service fee by resolutio . All monies.collected from the sewerage service fee, Including penalties andlinterest:for late payment; shall.be deposited into the Sewerage Enterprise Fupd established pursuant toiChapter 13 of this Code. Sec. 3"5.5. Sewerag service Fee=Delinquencies. c i Ordinance No.NS-2479 Page 3 or b � r I CITY SR PUBLIC RECORDS Fax: 14-647-6956 Oct 23 2001 17:02 P.05 Delinquent sewe service fee char es against a water.utility customer or person shall constiltutE a lien against I property upon recordation following appropriate action by tie city council following substantial compliance with all provisions of Government Code section t54354 at seq., as it may be amended from time to time, indud ng notice andian ppporfunjty to be heard; except as may 1 be provided therein. As a separate !pril distinct! remedy, the city attorney iN f authorized to bring suit pursuant to Giovefnment *Wde section 54356. The city!, - shall not disconnect water utility service for failure to pay the sewer service fee,; unless said failure is accompanied by a ctistomeet failure to pay the water utility; 'service in which case disconnection of water utility service shall be governed by' Article 11 of this Chapter. aFee. i Any_,person subject to the SeWera'3e Service Fag may_reguest that the' Director or designee Waive the requirement of payment of the Sewerage Services Fee due to individual circumstances that demonstrate, on a case-by- case basis, that the amQunt.of the feel is not reasonably related the cost of the 5 service the City provide in transporting sewerage to the Orange Countypublicly owned treatment Works and related infrastructure., The decision of the Director or designee maybe appBaled.pursuant to chapter 3iofthis Code. ' t . Section 3 Article XVII is hereby added to Chapter 13 of the Code to read as follows: i ARTICLEXVII. SEWEIjAGE'ENTERRRIJULIND Sec 13-155.Creation aFSewerage Enterprise Fund. Thereis hereby created and,establil$hed the Sewerage Enterprise Fund. See.13-156.Deposit o !Moneys. j All moneys'recelyed by the City as a sewerage service fee established pursuant,to section 39.T.1 of the Code, phall be deposited into the Sewerage Enterprise Fund.- Sec. 13.157. Expenditure of Moneys: t Moneys in the is enterprise fund,shall be expended only for. (a) repair, replyy ent and preventative maintenance of city owned main/trunk sewer lines; ! i (b) repair and rep,acement of sewer laterals, from city owned main/trunk lines and only for-thatpo lion located in the public right of way, if in the sole and Ordinance No.NS-2479 I Page of I t ' CITY SA PUBLIC RECORDS F] :rI14-647-6956 Oc� 23 2001 17:02 P.06 final determination of Mllllle Executive Pirector of the Public Works Agency or designee this portion o� lateral is in a of reptacement or repair, provided,', however that moneys i the fund shall of be e�ended for maintenance oq cleaning of said laterals; (c) planning, study. administra{ive, record-keeping, and mapping costs directly relating to subse ions (a) and `b); r (d) costs of ins lion of city owned mains/trunks: and I (a) repayment of and costs associated with issuance of bonds, certificates? of participation or other financing toolrs, whose proceeds shall be used Ply for ose3 I -o Ser:43-15$Interest and othar incorpe. Interest received py the City of$agta Ana from the investment of money In the sewerage enterprise fund, and all other income derived from the use:of 9 such moneys, shall be deposited+in the+sevrerage enterprise fund. .� Section 4: If any section, subsection,tseglltence,clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalidtorunconstitutional by,the decision of any court of competent-junsdiction, such decision jhalj not:affept the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council ofithe City of Santa Ana hereby declares that A would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion ereof irrespective ofrthe fact that`any one 'or more sections,.. subsections, sentPlnces,�-clauses; phrases .o( portions be declared invalid - or i unconstitutional. 19 particular, should the lien provision of section 2 of this ordinance be 1 deemed to affect the constitutionality of this ordinance,then the city council declares that ! it would have adopted this ordinance without the first sentence of section 39-55.5. 1. ADOPTED this 11h day of Sepomber,,2001. 0 :T• MjguelA. Rufido, V r Yor :f 1, .{ Ordinance No.N$-2479 t Page 5 of 6 i � CITY SA PUBLIC RECORDS Fax 14-647-6%6 f act 23 2ool 17:o2 4 P.o7 PPROVlfD AS TO FORM: JosephWj Fletcher, ity kt omey i Beni in Kaufman Chi Assistant CityAttolney i I AYES: Councilmem ere: Alvarez,B Franklin McGu n.Solorio 5 NOES: Councilme re: Christ i ABSTAIN ,councurnp m,No e- - - NOT PRESENT: Councilmem rs: Pulido 11f I CERTIFICATE OF ATTEST�tCW, 4D QRI�,INALITY f I PATRICIA E. HEALY Clerk'of the Council dp hei attest to. egrBtyithat thee, I attached ,Ordinance No. NS-2479 to be thg o4ginal o inanod, doptedi by_the r dy, j Corincil bf the City of Santa Apa on September tT, 2001 and thdtisaid pnilnanoe was i published in accordance with the Charter of the rty of SantaiAria. r, . bate: Yi./cy- Cle the CourldA. . a City of Santa Anq d 1 ! I Ordtn w"No.NS-2479 L i CITY SA PUBIC RECOMS Fax: '14-647-6956 ( Oct 23 2001 17:02 P.OB . •� •' • R .• -�. ...••� b .. 'n'.V.t �- �3.'�[Ttt9Q�.L8xSa8-6 �:.'Ia�s. A'�Ser 'Wirvr,�v bkfl MI SOLUTION N D. 001-059 A RESOLUTION F THE CfTY OI NCIL Of THE CITY OF SANTA ANA SE -TING THE P MqUNT' OF THE SEWER SERVICE FEE E TABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-56 OF THE SANTA ANA M NICIPAF CODE AND ADDING SAID EE TO TH ISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE . .BE IT RESOLVED BY E CITY.CO C L OF T E CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: ' coon 1. The CityCo uncll of the C Of Santa Ana hereby funds,determines arid�Ecfa" fes as follows: 1I A. On May 21, 2001 ►he City Counq➢was presented, at a study session, with evidence demonstrating that large portions of the Citys sewerage system, ' _ located in no one:area but cty�ide, is of sufficient age that it is need of z " additional and ext�aordinaryrepairapdreplagement a. The City Currently does not Igvyy a fee qr charge for the service of t transporting sewe a This seryr usa corgmoddy.in'thatthe:more water a water customer consumes"th4 g then sewerage lhat the customer generates. � T� • I t i C. The City's Charter and State law, injdudmg Out'nokmited`6 Government Code�.section 54340 at seq., provide t4at :the City may establish reasonable charges and fees) fat. the sgrvlce .the City provides in transporting sew rage to the ra a County publicly owned treatment works and related�infrasWcture, D. A fee for this service would not duplicate any existing'fee,'charge, levy or other toll currently wllected,by Vie Oily or any public agengy,,and would be distinct and separate from spy current or future (i) sewer standby or availability char9e or assessment, (ii) special benefit assessment of special tax imposed pursuant tq state or local law, (iii) sewer r connection charge or sewer capacity chargq paid in connection with or as_a condition of approving an application forlsewer servipe,:ar (iv) any Mitigation fee imposed on new ,development pursuant to plate law (Government Code §66000 at seq.)or local law. I E. This,fee would npl be 'chargAf .because no ;sewerage serxica is being provided, to raw 4Tnd, vacant property (i e., whem no waler a ice is being provided), to a customer who is ponstrmmg no water, to a water customer } - ResolutiorLNo.2001-059 I Page 1 of 7 MY SR PI.MIC RECOM Fax: 14-47-6955 I 04 23 2001 17:03 P.09 I i who is directly co netted to a n y owmij. sewer, or to a,water Gusto whose only water consumption i fo fire servjce or irrigation. F. The moneys co11 led by such serNice fee Would be placed into a fund that, would be used o y to repair, ro lacg and perform preventative maintenance: on city owned se r mains or i lines, and associated costs. In li addition, in a ch;nge to curre policy, the City could use such funds to, repair and repla that portion o the sewer clistome s lateral that lies within: the public right ofwray when n ry. No moneys from this fund would gol It o the citys gene I fund. G. The money colter by the er 4ervice fete has been conservatively set; the fee will not pa for all the co of the program which are estimated to be rhti.6 Y�i 1i li3 so estimated costs of the pmg is attached hereto =A and irtcorparateherein-by%tivs:re ren,ce astltoughIully set trirfh. The fee established py this resolution is stimated to collect$2.3 million per year. i ! H. The Counr41 regogn¢es and ungerstandg that not all potable water i consumed qy a water utility ofstomor is clocharged into the city-owned sawe* te)n sys and facilNes::A-Inali parcentaga,is consurned'mc s:used for; irrigation. 19 establishing•this felp, tMe'Counytl recognim:and understands! I that it could each the same fee py setting a higher fee and then discounting t the fee by ten or twenty percent{m make up for water consumed or used for ; ! inigation: Of course, those wsteriutility customers whose water is used exclusively (or irrigation or fire service are exempt from this-sewer.service fee ff..there water usage is sepasete)y metered I. ' The City C�rncil incorporates hgreir♦ as thoyghUly set forth,-the Request For Counct Action accompanying this rerselubon and all background Ii info matron end stud es presert.9d tP the City Council at the September 4, 2001rmeetir)q,the City Counctl:yWdysessiorts leading up to adoption of the: 20012001 dget,and theMay 1,1009;City Couneilsttdy setssion . Section 2. The fly C �ouncil hereb;r e�abllshea the fallowing sewer service -fee. 'i i A. A sewer semnce be for water gtility customers of $0.12 per water unit is .. hereby established. B. No water ut(1!ty cpstomarsshall42e:assessed ra:sewer,service)fee forthat amount of tyater usage;which 4pogeds 4,197 units in a.single month (or 8,333 units Ip s tv(o-month billing peer od). C. For any per4on who receives potable water service from a municipal water provider other than the City oq from a private water provider, and who y ; i Resolution Na 2001-059 Paget of _ I , CITY SA PUBLIC JCORDS Fax:?114-647-6956 O:t 23 2031 17:03 P. 10 dlschprges into I ie city-owned so ier sys m and facilities, the sewer: j servi9e fee shall a $0.12 per unit, if a City is able to determine tf the mattered wate usage of the n. If n9t, then the Execlyve Director of Public Works it designees all et a sever service fee of $2.40 per ` month per single{ffff mily home, a d f s for other uses accordingly. D. The City shall cen mence collect ng his sewer service fee on November 1, 2001 or as soon I ereafter as is Dracticable ip the opinion of tqe Executive Director ofFinanc E. No sewer service fee shall be I aviedagainst a water utility customer or'• person exempt pu uant to Code se6on 33-59.3. Section 3, Beginning 4uly 1, 2002, at the commencement of each fiscal year, this-5ewLec,sgrvjce4pe,,�f1a1(anpually q,jncre d by anjan),4,equej.,V the change since the last increase in the Consumer Pdce'1 ndex For All an Consumers ('CPI-U') for the Los Ange4es-Rlverside,-Orange Coupty ((region. ' Should a proposed CPI-U increase for any fiscal year not accurately reflept the increase in the Citys costs to err. undertake the program set forth in thisa�esojut n„themtheCEXequtiKe:Qrrec6orvof:the �• f C•a�tnp Public Works Agepcy, or designee is dir ed to placg before the City Council al proposal to either(a) not increase the sewersgrwFe:fee, by the:full changede the CRW, or(b) increase the sewer service fee'.by more than the chapge m.theLRI JU Section,t. _ This Resolution _86aU , �e .Npon fhe :effedare::date of r Ordinance No.•NS:2479, and tfh Clerkofthe¢ rdjoyac t�to:a l shall attesnd certify the Ygte adopting -this 'Resolution. Should said Onagce not ' a adopted,or should said : i Ordinance not become,effedjvg;this.ResolutlOn haUhe fiemted=U.and void and:of �'no further effect: f t � :; � Section 5. That without further actiorj of the City Pounril this sewer service fee shall be incorporated into the Cifys MisdellanE D Fee;Sc4edule. ADOPTED this 4!day of S ember ?MI. . .._.---- c 1 O., ijej- Ffuidox. 71c7:.! -or w r s ., r Resolution No.2001.059 . . . I �. :• Page 3of7 I I _ � t OIlY SA PUBLIC RECORDS Fax 14-647-6956 Oc 23 2001 17:03 P.11 - 3 DA$TO FORM: i J W Fk#pt .Cily Amy t Ka man . ` Ass tChyAttomey AYES: Councilmem rs: Bist Frar` i Pu ido So on 5 C NOES: -COuncilmem : Chri I _ _ ABSTAIN: _ Oumlmemb „Nnno n NOT PRESENT:Councllmem r • :, C7FICA OFATCEST I/�n N�IANDQRIC�INALIJY' 1, 'PATRICIA E. HEALY;' Cleik of the Coup do do he by. et to leM•owWlhw attached ResolutiO)No.'2001-059'to be the o maY of ,i bylh&:Cky. f Council of the City ofSanta'ArTon : a teinb Date: C11 B j city ofthe CAnppcO777777b t 7a .II{ 1 i — .e Resolution No.2001-059 Page 4 of i CITY SR PLeLIC R€CM Fax: 4-647-6956 Oc 231001 17:04 P.12 I i f �. EXHIBI A NEW13EWERE ERPRISEP O CST ANALYSIS STAFF COSTS Staff required to implement the reposed are�8 ovys: Associate engineer................... ..........�.. �$86 (B step , I ;i Assistant Engineer...._............. ::$8400 (B stan Iitem ..... ..............�........... .. . ...............$13 )0 (Asp f n"Itin -9ERIiCa9.-----... . Total annual staff cost.............. ............. OVERHEAD COSTS � ` I Overhead costs i}dude office suPPUaa, egyiprgent rental, ,insurance, B LAB plan, indirect costs, Treasury custom r 6arvkes chserg ,and PyV admin charges '�•' � V I s:.a Usingthe Water Administrali ark q ggaf, a charges would prpf8`�e 1=ngirtee rig u toihefollowm _" ..�.. Office supplies... ,,,. .. Il l ggipnrent rental............. O$ �" ... Insurance • . . ..•: Information Systergs Strategic 1pan ._�:481,20p Indirect costs............................I ......a$6G.00p .. . . Public Works adm n cltarges..,I........ .,.....,...I-= ,Treasury eustomecservioes.charges......= 1 177 _ Total: ..r.a p............... :$ 446 ITr _.J7 SEWER VI p GRAM i f Video all sewer mains in syst every 25 yews. 450:miles/25 years= 18 mile 4 per ye96?95+040:feet perlyear, 85,040:faeDper yeifr =at$0.71 per fQgttq$ '6301 use: 7 000 per year,-: r I Resolution No.2001-059 Page of a CITY SR PUBLIC RECOR08 Fax 14-5¢7 : :Oc 2342001 17:04: P. 13 - i � EMERGENCY SEWER LATE LAC M I ! j 1 Current requests for sewer lal ral rep rel la MIF is 1 re 4proxlmataly:5o per years [ City would refain(a contracto Ito proyidis a er en re la ments, estimated.cost", $4,500 per lateral ion an indlivic pal halls.; l i 50 laterals per ye x $4,500 r qr lateral ct 0 pi ar, k -SEWER MAIN t LACEME S - Assume 450 miles of sewer m tin,8,000 man iok a.4500 laterals. If all facilities erg assumed . hie I $f 100 ygars, the aGnual replacement sche ule would as follows: 4.5 miles of$ewer at �r 80 manholes. 400 sewer lateraly� Cr I win ctuagyre 4 ale n4pleoed raper geA basis):- '} T Majority (9 /o) sewer placement xpll ttp 8 Averages er I era] is 4 m size and`p et leggth . .' (I s . . :..I rr Estimated consfruq'on sts (including desigq a ad t ' n): 11 • 8"sewer main =$70 pe lineal foot • -r,.' Replaoelatral ,$1,50geach! • Replace manhole=$3 800 each, ; I Annual program construction 4 5miles of new rijarns .. ^ $1 jW 2001 4001aterals ,.. _$600.0(DO 80 mantales Total: _ __ .: _ „ _C- ts.s... .. _ per •�••:� 1 j Resolution No.2001-059 Page 6 of 7 1 _ CITY SP.PUELIC CORDS Fax 4-647{ 6 1 23120M 17:04 P.14 TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS Construction......... .................. .»...:..7�? $2,56 20 - staff..................... , Overhead costs.... .......�`..... .. ._ .. t = 6, 0 Videotaping.......... ........................_..H= A 0 Emergency lateral I a cemed i _:...;{,_- M 0 Total program cos .........„ �iq 40I r r r r r t 1 _ r I I r i i r Resolution No.2001-059 ` _Page 7 of - 1 RE: Item No. 15(c) RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR DISCLOSURE OF CONTACTS OR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS, SUPPLIERS, AND CONTRACTORS BIDDING FOR WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A POLICY PROCEDURE FOR DISCLOSURE OF CONTACTS OR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS, SUPPLIERS, AND CONTRACTORS BIDDING FOR WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District plan to build Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System ("System"); and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the planning, design, development, and construction of Phase I of the System will cost approximately Three Hundred Fifty-Two Million ($352,000,000) Dollars; and WHEREAS, in connection with the planning, design, development, and construction of the System, the Joint Cooperative Committee Members will make decisions on many millions of dollars in contracts. When a Committee Member receives information from a prospective consultant, supplier, or contractor outside of a public meeting, that information may provide an unfair advantage to the consultant, supplier, or contractor if the information is not shared with other Members of the Committee and the public. The reality or perception of favoritism undermines public confidence in the integrity of the decision-making process; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that the public interest would be best served by adopting a disclosure policy and procedure. The policy and procedure will promote the open, objective, and impartial conduct of the Committee's business, while maintaining an opportunity for the public to present views to the Joint Cooperative Committee. wss-TMpID-J:1a1Tro7:1a268s 1 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Joint Cooperative Committee Members Involved with the approval of contracts for the Groundwater Replenishment System shall publicly disclose any communications, including name and date, that they have had with any prospective consultant, supplier, or contractor, to the Joint Cooperative Committee prior to voting on an item involving said consultant, supplier, or contractor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary wss-TLw:PI:D-a:1arrmtia2ses 2 ITEM NO. 16 REVISED RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-20 AUTHORIZING SALARY AND BENEFIT CONTINUATION FOR MILITARY RESERVISTS CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2001. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING ONTINUATION OF SALARY, INSURANCE AND LEAVE BENEFITS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES WHO SERVE AS UNITED STATES MILITARY RESERVISTS AND WHO ARE CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 ORDERING THE READY RESERVE OF THE ARMED FORCES TO ACTIVE DUTY. ........... WHEREAS, on September 11, 2001 the United States of America suffered immense tragedy and horror as terrorist acts took thousands of valued lives; WHEREAS, military action has already begun in response to those attacks upon the United States and its residents and call-up of active military reservists is now taking place; WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") supports the U. S. military and deeply appreciates the role military reservists play in resolving conflict and defending our Country; WHEREAS, a number of District employees are active military reservists and may be called to active duty in connection with the Executive Order; WHEREAS, while the District can do little to ease the concerns for safety or burden of separation of employees from their families, it can ensure that they do not face the hardship of diminished income or loss of health care coverage; WHEREAS, District Policy D10.00 and state law provide for payment of an employee's full salary for the first thirty days of temporary military leave of absence for active duty; WHEREAS, the supplemental salary and benefits provided in this Resolution are intended to provide salary and benefits in excess of that required by State law and District policy. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: Employees in the military reserve who are called into active service shall receive full compensation for the first thirty days and shall thereafter receive the difference between their regular base salary with the District and their military pay. Section 2: Such employees shall receive continuation of all leave time accruals, including personal leave or vacation and sick time accruals or equivalent. Section 3: Such employees shall receive continuation of all health insurance coverages in effect at such time as the employee is called into active service until such time as he/she returns. Section 4: Such employees shall continue to be participants in the District's retirement system in accordance with procedures established by the Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS). Section 5: Such employees shall continue to receive all other benefits to which the employee is entitled as a regular employee. Section 6: The pay and benefits authorized by this resolution shall remain in effect for the full duration of the employee's activated military assignment. Section 7: The District urges all local governments and private sector employers to consider providing similar support and assistance to their employees who are called into active duty. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 24, 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 0 EDITORIALS 1 Don't rush into plan for treating sewage 0 range County coastal cities Some district board members and environmentalists are believe that coastal cities them- pushing the Orange selves are largely responsible for County Sanitation District the problem.A recent Register to spend more than$400 million series pointed to crumbling an- on a new treatment system that derground sewers in Huntington puts wastewater through a sec- Beach and elsewhere that could ondary treatment,plus at least be fouling the ocean.There's de- another$15 million a year to run bate over this,with the sanitation the new system district itself arguing that de¢e- The goal is to clean up Orange pit sewers are not the cause be- County beaches,especially those cause of the slant of the land,but around Huntington Beach which this issue points to how hard it is have at times been forced to close to trace the problem Other possi because of high bacteria levels. bilities relate to storm drains or a The agency operates on a fed- concentration of birds in,say,the eral waiver that exempts it from Talbert Marsh. secondary treament.Board mem- Another reason to avoid a rush bers have until the end of next to secondary treatment The un- year to decide whether to ask intended consequence of addi- federal officials to allow the tional sludge that would be cre- agency to continue operating uo- aced by the secondary treatment der the exemption beyond 2003. process.That sludge needs to go On the surface,it looks like a somewhere,and the usual dump- nb=bralner.Beaches are some- ing locations in Riverside County times fouled,and the agency re- are now off limits after that sponsible for sanitation is send- county banned O.C.sludge last ing wastewater into the ocean summer.(Perhaps the coastal ci- that isn't treated at the high- ties eager to see this new treat- est-possible level. ment system go into place will Yet there are good reasons not step forward and offer additional to rush out and mandate the next sites within thew cities where the treatment level.For starters, sludge can be put.) there isn't much evidence con- Supporters of a new system ar- necting the high bacteria levels to gue the prediction of a doubling the current treatment system of rates is overstated.Overstated The sanitation district has tested or not,the costs will be high.The a variety of theories and has con- district will have final study in- cluded that mother possibility- formation in March.why not urban rumff-is the more likely wait for the data to come in be- culprit for the problem fore spending the money now? Orange County Register October 22,2001 REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24,2001 AT 5 P.M. 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 26T" MEETING WERE APPROVED AS DRAFTED. THE BOARD SECRETARY SHALL RECEIVE AND FILE THEM. 2. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT A. I REPORTED ON THE NATIONAL URBAN WATERSHED CONFERENCE THAT WAS HELD LAST WEEK IN COSTA MESA. PEOPLE FROM THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ATTENDED THIS MEETING. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ALL AREAS OF THE COUNTRY ARE COMING TOGETHER TO ADDRESS WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS IN THEIR RIVER VALLEYS. THINKING HOLISTICALLY, LIKE WE HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO DO HERE IN THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, IS THE WAY THIS COUNTRY WILL ADDRESS THE LAST TIER OF WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS STILL FACING US. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER REPORTED ON THE FOLLOWING: A. REGARDING AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE, THE GENERAL MANAGER DISCUSSED AN ITEM THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE FAHR COMMITTEE AND THE FULL BOARD IN NOVEMBER. AS WE HAVE DONE IN PAST YEARS, WE WOULD PROVIDE TWO ADDITIONAL YEARS OF SERVICE CREDIT TO EMPLOYEES RETIRING BY MARCH 31 , 2002. THE STEERING COMMITTEE RECEIVED THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. THIS ITEM WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE FAHR COMMITTEE AND THE DIRECTORS IN NOVEMBER FOR CONSIDERATION. B. BLAKE ALSO REPORTED THAT THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD'S PROPOSED NEW PERMITS FOR LOCAL SEWER SYSTEMS WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF WORKSHOP ON DECEMBER 7TH, THE SANITATION DISTRICT IS WORKING CLOSELY WITH THE CITIES AND SANITARY DISTRICTS IN OUR SERVICE AREA TO DEVELOP A COORDINATED RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT PERMIT. HE WARNED US THAT THERE WOULD BE NEW EXPENSES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CITIES WHEN THE PERMIT IS ADOPTED. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS PLACED ON THE SANITATION DISTRICT INVOLVING ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT AND COORDINATION WITHIN THE COUNTY C. THE GM ALSO REPORTED ON THE PROPOSED NEW STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CITIES AND THE COUNTY. THIS PERMIT WILL ALSO BE PART OF THE DECEMBER 7TH WORKSHOP OF THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. SANITATION DISTRICT STAFF IS SOMEWHAT ENCOURAGED THAT SOME OF THE IMPRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE FIRST VERSION OF THE PERMIT WILL BE CHANGED BECAUSE OF THE COMMENTS THE REGIONAL BOARD STAFF HEARD FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY CITIES AND THE COUNTY ITSELF. HE HAS DIRECTED SANITATION DISTRICT STAFF TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR THIS AND TO PROVIDE UPDATES. D. THE GENERAL MANAGER ALSO REPORTED ON THE OUTCOME OF THE JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY REGARDING THE SARI LINE. THE COMMITTEE MET FOR TWO HOURS YESTERDAY AND AGREED TO A FUNDING FORMULA FOR COMPLETING THE ENGINEERING WORK ON THE PROJECT. SANITATION DISTRICT STAFF ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INTERIM WORK TO PROTECT THE LINE SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY DECEMBER 1ST-AS PLANNED. 4. GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT: A. THE GENERAL COUNSEL INDICATED THAT TONIGHT'S BOARD ACTION REGARDING MILITARY LEAVE FOR RESERVISTS NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED SLIGHTLY TO MEET OCERS REQUIREMENTS. THIS WILL BE DISCUSSED WHEN THIS ITEM COMES UP LATER IN TONIGHT'S AGENDA B. TWO OTHER LAWSUITS WERE SETTLED THIS WEEK. DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED AT TONIGHT'S MEETING. 5. UNDER DISCUSSION ITEMS, THE STEERING COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE ITEM THAT ALSO APPEARS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD AGENDA REGARDING: COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE WITH PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIERS. THE STEERING COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION THAT WOULD LIMIT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS OF FIRMS THAT ARE VYING FOR GWRS CONTRACTS. YOU WILL BE ACTING ON THIS RESOLUTION LATER IN THE MEETING. GENERAL COUNSEL ADVISED US THAT THE WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS OVERWHELMINGLY APPROVED THIS RESOLUTION AT IT MEETING LAST WEEK. THE STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT WORDING BE INCLUDED TO INCLUDE REPORTING DISCUSSIONS SPECIFICALLY ON GWRS-RELATED CONTRACTS. 6. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENTED TO COMMITTEES IN NOVEMBER WERE REVIEWED. 7. THERE WERE THREE ITEMS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION, HOWEVER, THE FIRST ITEM HAS BEEN SETTLED. THE OTHER TWO ARE SECURITY ISSUES AND THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION RE THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE GENERAL MANAGER'S EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION. THE RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE DISCUSSED IN TONIGHT'S CLOSED SESSION. 8. 1 WAS ASKED TO POLL THE DIRECTORS TO SEE HOW MANY OF YOU STILL PLAN TO ATTEND THE WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19T" BOARD MEETING. THE STEERING COMMITTEE EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING THE CONFLICT WITH THE STATE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE DURING THAT SAME WEEK. COULD I SEE A SHOW OF HANDS OF THOSE WHO DO NOT PLAN TO ATTEND THE DECEMBER 19T" MEETING AND WHOSE ALTERNATES WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE EITHER. CHAIR'S REPORT TO THE BOARD AT THE OCTOBER 24, 2001 MEETING 1 . THERE'S SOME IMPORTANT LOCAL CITY NEWS THAT WE SHOULD ALL RECOGNIZE. I'VE INCLUDED A COPY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA'S NEW ORDINANCE, NO. NS-2479, IN YOUR MEETING FOLDERS. THIS ORDINANCE ADDS AN ARTICLE TO THE CITY'S CODE ESTABLISHING A SEWERAGE SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND AND SEWERAGE SERVICE FEE. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT AND NECESSARY ACTION TO FUND IMPROVEMENTS TO SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IN ORANGE COUNTY. AS YOU MAY HAVE HEARD, THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD WILL ADOPT A NEW SET OF PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCAL CITY SEWERS THROUGHOUT THE NORTH END OF ORANGE COUNTY. WE SHOULD ALL CONSIDER THE WISDOM OF SANTA ANA'S ACTION. AT THIS TIME I'D LIKE TO ASK DIRECTOR PAT MCGUIGAN TO COMMENT WHAT IT TOOK TO GET THIS ACTION PASSED. 2. THE NEXT DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP IS SCHEDULED FOR NEXT SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3RD, BETWEEN 8 AND 11 A.M. HERE AT THE DISTRICT. STAFF WILL BE PRESENTING INFORMATION ON THE OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. YOU WILL BEGIN TO HEAR ABOUT THE TECHNICAL, SCIENTIFIC, REGULATORY, FINANCIAL AND PUBLIC OUTREACH ACTIVITIES THAT SURROUND THIS IMPORTANT PUBLIC POLICY DECISION. IF WE ACT ACCORDING TO PLAN, IN NOVEMBER OF NEXT YEAR, THIS 25-MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE MAKING ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISIONS IT WILL MAKE: WHAT TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY SHOULD WE USE IN THE FUTURE AND WHAT KIND OF AN EPA AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT SHOULD WE APPLY FOR? I URGE ALL OF YOU TO ATTEND AND TO ALSO ENCOURAGE YOUR FELLOW CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO COME TO THIS WORKSHOP. 3. THERE IS ALSO A GWRS WORKSHOP SCHEDULED AT THE WATER DISTRICT ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 17T", BEGINNING AT 8 A.M. THIS IS AN EXCELLENT OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME MORE ACQUAINTED WITH THIS VERY IMPORTANT REGIONAL PROJECT. FINAL DESIGN IS WELL UNDERWAY AND THE LONG- TERM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WATER DISTRICT AND US IS NEARLY COMPLETED. 4. MEETINGS FOR THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN NOVEMBER ARE SCHEDULED FOR: • PDC COMMITTEE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1ST • OMTS COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7TH • FAHR COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14T" THE STEERING COMMITTEE AND BOARD MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28T" 5. THE DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12T", FOR VETERAN'S DAY AND ALSO ON THURSDAY AND FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22ND AND 23RD TO CELEBRATE THANKSGIVING. 6. AND FINALLY, IT IS MY GREAT PLEASURE TO ANNOUNCE A GREAT HONOR THAT WAS GIVEN TO MY COLLEAGUE AND FRIEND, AND OUR VICE CHAIRMAN, PETER GREEN. THE BOLSA CHICA CONSERVANCY PRESENTED DIRECTOR PETER GREEN AND HIS WIFE CATHY ITS "2001 CONSERVATORS OF THE YEAR" AWARD AT A SPECIAL LUNCHEON IN THEIR HONOR. PETER AND HIS WIFE HAVE SPENT A LIFETIME EDUCATING THOUSANDS OF STUDENTS AND COLLEAGUES ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES INCLUDING BRINGING RESOLUTION TO THE LAND USE QUESTION AT THE BOLSA CHICA. THEY HAVE BOTH BEEN LONG TIME MEMBERS OF THE BOLSA CHICA CONSERVANCY. IN 1990, AS MAYOR PRO TEM, HE WAS A SIGNATORY ON THE FORMATION OF THE BOLSA CHICA CONSERVANCY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. BLAKE ANDERSON REPRESENTED THE DISTRICT AND I'D LIKE HIM TO COMMENT ON THE EVENT. ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 10/24/01 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .....................ANDERSON................... ✓ �L — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... 1� — (LARSON) ........................ BOYD............................ o" L — (MILLER) .......................... BRADY ........................�G — (CRANDALL) ................... CARR07ZO................. — (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... �� — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. _� — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... �� — (GAROFALO) ................... GREEN......................... ✓ — (DUVALL) ......................... GULLIXSON................... �c — (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... ✓ �� — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... �G — (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ — (BROADWATER).............. LEYES.......................... y — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... — (CHRISTY)........................ MC GUIGAN.................. ... C — (SIMONOFF) .................... MOORE........................ ✓ — (COONTZ)........................ MURPHY...................... a, a, — (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ / — (FRESCHI)........................ PATTERSON................. i n.F a-y9✓ — (KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ _� ✓ — (ADAMS) .......................... RIDGEWAY................... y — (DOW)...............................SIGLER......................... Gt — (SMITH. CHUCK) .............SILVA........................... ✓ ✓ — (BLAKE)............................WALKER....................... �c �L — STAFF: ylu(q }3LEM L Anderson ✓ kca� -tdr fbt( X4 , 6hkeHr— — U� Kyle Ludwin ✓ �( v Cc1 Miles I'vi.CcA Murphy Ooten Tomko Streed ✓ OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 08/22/01 CO/ G:\wp.dua admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Dimdom Roll Call.dop REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS JAJIersons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.g DATE: �z q U AGENDA ITEM NO. COn Jtd.✓j S NAME: (please print) K,gQ HOME ADDRESS: 2 ;9,E 6 6 (number/street) Cd,4dra D/L /� 4R �j26/aS (city/zip code)n TELEPHONE: Y �,S. L 7s • 2' S S REPRESENTING: Ocee ,. Q (self/name of organizes" n) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: I aI 2-+ Ol AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) D.J /YtG 4'P e � / _ HOME ADDRESS: —?V / /'SAv (numb I tr�gt) (city/ p code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: .� (self me of organization) �• I REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: /TI 'Z/ —d AGENDA ITEM NO. &00< �iA-fLr NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: CC Z / (number/street) /mar-,�T (city/zip code) I pp TELEPHONE: / ��— O -cay b REPRESENTING: [Y[DhL� Cy' W� CY'LdZi'!1 (self/name of organization) ✓• REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: / V L AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) 7e V/ (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: / REPRESENTING: s (self/name of organization) 1 / = REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �� AGENDA ITEM NO. PiOW ' f.'WM)5)M NAME: (please print) GVT C6KR0 `--Zo HOME ADDRESS: 171,61 73F-P-014 CST (number/street) FDUNT/YlN 2ak (city/zip code) G // TELEPHONE: ��1 9�vo —CSoZ7vZ REPRESENTING: cSUI-F — PR WgrF— CIM12—ft (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOMEADDRESS: — (number/street) / (city/zip code)TELEPHONE: 6� P3 G `" `7 �3 S REPRESENTING: L2 a (i1 (self/name of organization) / . REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: D Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) e e * ()* f e ' ' To HOME ADDRESS: Id Z (number/street) (city(zip code) TELEPHONE: 4 3o-z- REPRESENTING: (self/name of anization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATIONIFIRM leaseprint) lease print DA-W CC67;4 Hf-:<A 49MBILL- ' O D,G v s LAB/ �.J ✓ - u1 OT I -q HAWGDTAUDMINIMTORWS IGWIN FORM.D /D/ay/oil , `fr"cTirn,. of 8 1997 Death of Heather Preen Due To Sewage 8-8-99 from http:llwww.leighday.co.uk/Fsearch.html site (the lawyers) Inquest into the death of Heather Preen We acted for Mark and Julie Preen at the inquest into the death of their daughter Heather last summer. Heather was infected with the bacteria E. tali 0157 while on summer holiday with her family at Dawlish Warren, a beach resort in Devon, and died as a result of a range of health problems associated with this infection. Crude sewage is currently discharged to the sea through a nearby long sea outfall. At the Inquest,we presented evidence suggesting that, under certain conditions, sewage could be "shed back onto the beach and was a possible source of the bacteria. Independent scientific and medical experts giving evidence at the Inquest agreed that sewage was a possible source. A verdict of misadventure was returned, reflecting the unfortunate and unusual circumstances of Heather's death. In addition,the Coroner made a number of recommendations, including that in future sewage be treated with ultra-violet radiation to kill bacteria such as E. coli 0157 before it is discharged into the sea. from www.heatherpreentrust.org site My daughter, Heather Preen died on the 8th August 1999 whilst on holiday in Dawlish Warren from Haemolytic Ursemic Syndrome(HUS)after being poisoned by E.coli 0157, she was only eight years old. As with the majority of cases of E.coli 0157 poisoning, the authorities have been unable to find the source of her contamination but have confirmed there were other children infected at the same time as Heather and the only link between them was the beach at Daw ish Warren. In an attempt to stop such a tragedy occurring again the Heather Preen Trust has been established to raise awareness about E.coli and help find a cure for HUS. Our aims are: Raise awareness of Emil. Provide educative information to children, parents and professionals relating to E.coli. Raise funding for medical research into Improving identification, treatment and potential cures for E.coli poisoning. On the 10th February 2000 the inquest into Heathers death took place in Teignmouth.The jury returned a verdict of misadventure and the coroner made several recommendations: An ultra violet system to be installed at Dawlish to control sewage discharge. An extension of the blue flag area and the length of time the blue flag is flying during the summer. A summer dog ban to be Imposed on the whole of the beach. South West Health Authority should make G.P.s more aware of E.coli 0157 as the number of Infections are increasing. A central database to be set up to hold information on similar cases. Before the inquest began I was asked by the people representing me what I wanted to achieve and it was from this discussion the Idea of a central database grew. During the Inquest all those being questioned; public health, environmental agency, South West Water and Teignbridge District Council were asked if they felt a central database would have aided their investigation and the answer was always yes. Consequently the main thrust of this web page will be to collate information about E.coli so that it can be used as a resource in raising awareness, research and outbreak control. Heather Preen Trust-Patrons: Professor Hugh Pennington, Dr. Barrie Trevena INTERCEPTOR rw g;saru lews SEWER LINE REALIGNMENT PROJECT Ranch, requires immediate attention Impact Report (EIR), the long-term Letter From as its protective covering has eroded benefits of each alignment, the the General over the years, making it vulnerable estimated costs, and construction during rainstorms when high volumes impacts on residents and on the of rainwater flow downstream. environment, We have also been Manager reviewing possible alignments that A break in the SARI Line would were considered early in our planning This is the first in a series of cause a widespread disruption of efforts but which were not refer- newsletters to keep you updat- service and a sewage spill that would enced in the EIR. Our review should ed about Orange County ultimately close the ocean waters off be complete by the summer of 2002. sanitation District's progress on the of Newport Beach and Huntington Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Beach. A break in the line would also A six-member Citizens Advisory Line Relocation and Protection allow rocks, large branches and other Committee (CAC) of area residents Project. debris to enter the sewer pipe. These and business owners has been materials can cause extensive damage established. The CAC is providing to processing equipment at Orange valuable input on the proposed pro- County Sanitation District's ject, including construction impacts treatment plant. to the Yorba Linda and Anaheim communities and any community Initially, Orange County Sanitation concerns. A list of CAC members is k!Ir District favored relocating the SARI included in this newsletter. pipeline from under the Santa Ana River riverbed to the north bank of We will continue to keep you the river, from the Green River Golf informed through the newsletter, Course to Weir Canyon Road. community meetings and the CAC. Although this is viewed as the techni- cally and environmentally superior Sincerely, option, several issues have arisen, including concerns about project costs and impacts to residents who The SARI Line is the major regional reside near the proposed pipeline 44a, sewer pipeline serving Orange alignment. County and the Inland Empire. A Blake P. Anderson four-mile section of the pipeline, Over the past few months, we have General Manager from the Orange County/San been reviewing the alternatives out- Orange County Sanitation District Bernardino county line to Savi lined in the project Environmental SARI Line Repair and Maintenance Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is currently and installing protective lids to prevent debris from enter- reviewing the alternatives for the relocation and protec- ing the pipe should the top of a manhole be damaged. tion of the SARI Line. The review process, which will be completed next year, represents a delay in the overall During the repair and maintenance work, you can expect project. During this time, the SARI Line remains vubtem- to see backhoes, dump trucks and a water truck working ble to damage during heavy rainstorms when large in the riverbed. Crews will get access to the work area amount of rainwater flow in the river. through existing access points near Gypsum Canyon and Coal Canyon. No truck traffic will impact school To protect the line, OCSD began repair and maintenance crossings or school bus stops. work in September along a 11/2-mile portion of the riverbed, from Camino de Bryant to Hartford Court, OCSD has received permits from the appropriate which is west of Gypsum Canyon. regulatory agencies to perform the maintenance and repair work. The work should be completed by mid- The initial work focuses on eight manholes. Repair crews December and will cost about $500,000, This investment are inspecting the manholes, strapping them down to will protect and strengthen the SARI Line before the prevent them from being washed away during heavy rains rainy season begins. 0—,,,< nr „n,rar,, Lr,.rr,.r P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Ca 92788-8127 Current Conditions, Possible Solutions Discussed at Stakeholders Meeting Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) convened a "The SARI Line is adjacent to a residential neighborhood, special meeting of Yorba Linda and Anaheim city repre- under a river inhabited by endangered species and sentatives and others to discuss the current condition of bordered by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Line and some of and the 91 freeway. There are numerous conditions the proposed solutions to protect or relocate a critical and regulations that we must take into consideration," four-mile section of the pipeline. he continued. Held at the Yorba Linda Community Center on June 14, Since the SARI Line was constructed in the 1970s, signifi- the SARI Line stakeholders meeting was an opportunity cant portions of the riverbed that once provided a 20- for attendees to learn about the regulatory, construction foot-deep protective covering have eroded to less than and environmental considerations facing OCSD on this 3 feet in some areas. This has made the sewer pipeline project. particularly vulnerable during heavy storms when high volumes of water in the river are carried downstream. "This is a very complex construction project. The stakeholders meeting brought together all impacted In the meantime, OCSD has conducted visual inspections groups as OCSD strives to develop a workable solution to of the pipeline to check manholes and their level of protecting this critical sewer pipeline," said David exposure. The results of these efforts have been used to Ludwin,OCSD director of engineering. develop a repair and maintenance plan that will be implemented while a permanent solution to protecting the pipeline is studied. Citizens AdvisorMnrmittee Provfides Valuable hrput -- We are pleased to announce the formation of a Citizens and impacts to residents, businesses, the environment and Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Santa Ana River the endangered species living in the Santa Ana River. OCSD Interceptor (SARI) Line Relocation and Protection Project. staff also answered questions from CAC members on the This group of six area residents will provide Orange County feasibility of specific pipeline alignments and the history of Sanitation District with important input on our proposed the SARI Line since it was completed in the mid-1970s. project and how it may affect neighborhoods and businesses along the construction route. The CAC will meet throughout the two-year construction project. If you have a comment or question regarding the The first CAC meeting was held in May when OCSD staff SARI Line project, in addition to contacting OCSD, you reported on their progress of reviewing the numerous pro- may contact any of these Citizens Advisory Committee posed pipeline alignments, the associated construction costs members: Francine Forquer Brian Powell Steve Sprenger Villa Del Rio Homes - Bel Canto Homes Vdla Del Rio Homes 692-0683 (home) 692-9454 (home) 939-6015 (work) alohanoe@aol.com brian@brianpowell.com steve.sprenger@grubb-ellis.com Ken Erbeznik Don Babbitt Dr. Sam Sarem Bel Canto Homes Bel Canto Homes E. La Palma Business Area 692-8386 (home) 692-2728 (home) 692-1198 (home) kerbeznik@mail.bkstcom don.helene.rabbitt@dellepm.com sam4iprc@aol.com Also, if you are interested in participating on the committee please call Lisa Murphy(Lawson), OCSD communications manager, during regular business hours at (714) 593-7120, or you may leave her a voice-mail message after hours. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on 42%/87/k .2?r/ , 20,(, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on j /Z c 201 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this�day of < , 20 Q/ Zt<- Penny M. Kyle, Se retary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District \\RADON\DATAI\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) October 17, 2001 Board Secretary phew: 17141992-2411 f.: To the Chair and Members (714)982-0358 of the Board of Directors www.dcaa.co:n mailing address: Subject: Board Letter P0. Box8127 Fauntain Valley.CA 92728-8127 scrs.e.aar...: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 1 0844 Bllia Avenue information on any of the items, please call me. Pouncain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Ocean Issues: Formation of a New Citizens Advisory Committee Member AQB.else It's has been three years since our citizen and business-based Rate Advisory 0 Committee and the Planning Advisory Committee met to provide advice and Cities comment on our Strategic Plan. The original RAC and PAC groups chose the Anaheim treatment technology,water reclamation and funding methodologies adopted by the Brad Board in the 1999 Strategic Plan. We are now asking former RAC or PAC members Buena Park to reconvene to form PAC2 to discuss possible changes to the strategic plan. New cypress Fountain valley members will be asked to join. Fullartan Barden Brava The first meeting will take place on Wednesday, November 7 from 9- 11 a.m. in the Huntington Beach Irvine Boardroom. This will be the first of several PAC 2 meetings. Additional meetings will Le Habra be held the first half of 2002. The PAC2 recommendations will be presented to the Le Palms Los Alamitos OCSD Board of Directors for consideration. Newport Beach Orange Plecanua Banta And Biosolids Update seal Beach Stanton Tustin Composting for Class A Biosolids mild Park Yorbe Linda We continue to conduct due diligence research on the Inland Composting and Call of orange Organic Recycling (ICOR) proposed compost facility. ICOR is in the process of completing the design of an enclosed composting facility in Colton. The District may sselesrg Districts become a funding partner. It is anticipated that staff will present a recommendation Caste Maaa on the ICOR facility at the November OMITS Committee and Board meetings. Mldwey Day Water Districts Chemical Treatment for Class A Biosolids and Landfill Options Irvine Finnish District's counsel is reviewing agreements with California Soil Products and Waste Markets. California Soil Products will manage a minimum of 100 wet tons per day of the District's biosolids through the production of a chemically-stabilized Class A biosolids product and Waste Markets will provide an emergency biosolids management option to landfill up to 400 wet tons of biosolids per day. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management Members of the Board Page 2 October 17, 2001 Kings County Class B Biosolids Pursuant to the appeal process found in the Kings County Biosolids Ordinance, the District is requesting an eight-year extension for land application of Class B biosolids on the 1800 acres we own there. The District has retained Arthur Andersen, LLP,to prepare a financial analysis relating to the District's purchase and intended use of the property. This analysis provides support for an eight-year extension of the District's ability to land apply Class B biosolids to obtain a return on the substantial investment we made on the property—depending, in part, on our reliance on assurances by the supervisors that a Class B-friendly ordinance was in the offing. Our appeal is scheduled to be heard by the Kings County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, November 6 in Hanford, California. LACSD Compost Facility The Los Angeles County Sanitation District(LACSD)plans to buy 14,000 acres of Kings County farmland to build a composting facility that will produce Class A biosolids. LACSD reached an agreement last month with Westlake Farms Inc., to purchase a farm east of Kettleman City. Before the agreement can be finalized, Westlake Farms Inc. must obtain a conditional-use permit from Kings County to build the composting center. Once the permit is issued, construction could take a year. The project isn't likely to be operating until sometime in 2003. LACSD plans to truck more than 100,000 tons of biosolids a year into Kings County. The biosolids will be mixed at the composting center with green waste to be used as soil amendment on the farmland. Santa Ana River Watershed Group Selected As A Pilot Project Under The Wayne Watershed BIII The Santa Ana River Watershed Group was named by Governor Gray Davis as one of ten watershed projects selected under the Wayne Watershed Bill, AB 2117,to be evaluated by a newly formed State task force. Under the leadership of State Water Resources Control Board Chair Art Bagget, Secretary of the Cal/EPA Winston H. Hickox, and Secretary for Resources Mary Nichols, the California Watershed Management Task Force will evaluate the Santa Ana River Watershed Group, among other selected watershed projects throughout California protecting California's natural resources. The Task Force will submit a final report to the Legislature on February 1, 2002 outlining its recommendations supporting cooperative watershed projects. General Manager Blake Anderson is a founder of the SARW G and presently serves as its co-chair. Members of the Board Page 3 October 17, 2001 OCSD Records Manager Selected as President-elect for ARMA International The District's records manager, Juanita Skillman, CRM, FAI, has been elected to serve as the President-elect of the Association for Information Management Professionals International (ARMA) beginning July 1, 2002. She currently serves as Association Treasurer and will then automatically advance to the position of Association President on July 1, 2003. ARMA is a not-for-profit association with over 10,500 members. The organization's mission is to provide education, research, and networking opportunities to information professionals,to enable them to use their skills and experience to leverage the value of records, information, and knowledge of corporate assets and as contributors to organization success. Recent OCSD Tours The following tours have recently occurred or are planned: • Calvary Christian School • California Technical Trade and Commerce Agency • City of Garden Grove Public Works Department • Home School High School Biology Class • Santiago College • Groundwater Producers • Saddleback Christian Academy EPA Permit Outreach Presentations • September 17—Newport Beach Surfriders, Dr. Bob Ghirelli and Dr. Jeff Armstrong • September 18—Huntington Beach Tomorrow, Lisa Murphy • September 25—KPCC Radio Interview, Lisa Murphy • September 25—Siena Club Panel, Lisa Murphy • October 3—City Managers Association, Blake Anderson • October 8—Sisters of St. Joseph, Blake Anderson Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer The first community newsletter was mailed to 3,100 residents and businesses near the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line in the Yorba Linda and Anaheim. This is the first of several newsletters mailed to update the community about the progress of the SARI line relocation/protection project. In addition,we continue to a-mail updates to the Citizens Advisory Committee. Members of the Board Page 4 October 17, 2001 Currently, the focus is on the protection of the line and the manholes this winter, as the line remains in the river while the relocation or protection alternatives are reviewed. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Bla 4Ane General Manager BPA.jt cl"W.wxumcwLL ns M me eo 1110201 ooc Attachments D. 2001 Onarge County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints.2001 nemw == �o EJan 11 o �� mm If ora� ors mr oe mrr�Jun Jul If arm �v a o mr.� ora �r� ern arm 7 ram �r� mtr mM �m 3 M mo one �� ora �� related IM mm �m mm mv�i ors mvs Mary If Jur, Jul mrs mrn mo ©m 3/19 m mrn mm 0412 no ®m oyes mMs mo �m �m mrn oo 19 orn ors mncP mm �y mm oyes oyes mFF m•jjj mm ® wilt OF we �� mr om �� �� �� willM m� oiE W10res mo W YE 9110 no mrn F12 m �� -- ®IRO w12 mwig wig wig we MM .hCOII.:Total 0 Total 11 TM 0 Total 3 r 7 rTMNI 4T�12 MT�14 11 Total I TOW rTll fl HJO:VSH:el:ll Tms spreadsheet does rwt Indude in-house odor oomplalnls g:Wxel.dtMw%Odor Complaint Log.xls Sewage disposal becoming heated debate Page 1 of 4 Home Nali°n8 L°ral SpoM1s Busimss A°renl H fth& HomeB Sh. Si> ' F°°l Gellin8 G Woi1° FHness GaNen Features Away PPagpl.i Rwiw&State M, ® _ TOP NEWS' /P-h View Sewage disposal becoming heated " debate wn a 4�a1 X* RELATE , �reyouurcity Activists want less waste dumped into the ocean, but ,sewas t county says costs would be exorbitant. yields n September 30,2001 0 Ema By PAT BRENNAN The Orange County Register ' .wonlin^ What is quickly becoming Orange County's most bitter environmental conflict is not about trees, endangered species or smoggy skies. It's a fight over a deeper dilemma: what to do with the county's sewage. l Buy F, a"i ®r, The stakes are high. A growing legion of activists wants to stop Finndd�� the county Sanitation District from releasing 240 million gallons Loral en e"a omen[ rem news n im of sewage into the ocean each day— sewage that is, in essence, more contaminated than the Clean Water Act Re°es°n wur Mrre normally allows. The activists - only a handful at first- have mushroomed into Cafifomia Lottery troops of advocates appearing at dozens of public meetings and an e-mail network nearly 200 strong. They are fanning across the county to persuade cities that pipe sewage to the Sanitation District to join them in opposing the Clean Water Act exception, known as a waiver. Huntington Beach, already at odds with the district over who may be to blame for ocean contamination, voted against the waiver this month. Newport Beach did so last week. In August, Seal Beach became the first city to oppose the waiver. The activists plan to address the Santa Ana City Council on Monday. Activists fear that the treated sewage, released from a diffuser pipe 41/2 miles off the coast and 200 feet underwater, is making its way back toward shore, contaminating surf and forcing ocean closures or the posting of warning signs. "People that have heard about it want to get involved," said http://www.ocregister.com/news/waiver00930cci3.shtmi 1 0101/2 0 0 1 Sewage disposal becoming heated debate Page 2 of 4 Jan Vandersloot, a longtime Newport Beach activist and organizer of the anti-waiver Ocean Ouffall Group. "People don't want to have their children and grandchildren swimming in someone else's toilet water." But district officials say the activists' claims are overblown. Despite repeated tests, district scientists say they cannot find evidence that the plume of contaminants from the ouffall pipe comes any closer than 1 1/2 miles off Huntington Beach or half a mile off Newport Beach. And they contend that defeat of the waiver, which would force them to clean sewage to a higher level before releasing it, would come with a heavy cost: as much as $400 million to redesign the district's sewage treatment plant, roughly doubling the average homeowner's sewer fees, to $200 a year. Businesses would pay tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars more. "We need to be careful what we're asking for," said Jim Herberg, the district's acting engineering manager. District administrators also speak of the environmental costs of stepped-up sewage treatment: increased odors and air pollution, rising energy use and twice as much solid sewage waste exported to other counties. The district must apply for a new waiver by December 2002. Out of 16,000 sewage treatment plants in the nation, only 36 have waivers. The Orange County district is the largest waste producer among those 36. The South Orange County Wastewater Authority, which operates the county's only other ouffall pipe, does not have a waiver. Its sewage receives the higher level of treatment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says science, not public opinion, will guide its decision on whether to grant the district a new five-year waiver in 2003. If hard data show bacteria from the offshore sewage plume are contaminating near-shore waters, the waiver will be denied, said EPA water administrator Janet Hashimoto. But the science so far has been inconclusive; release of results from the most recent study are due next spring. In the meantime, all sides in the controversy have stepped up their public-relations campaigns. Intense public pressure might not sway the EPA, but activists hope it could convince the district's board not to reapply for the waiver. http://www.ocregister.com/news/waiver00930cci3.shtml 10/01/2001 Sewage disposal becoming heated debate Page 3 of 4 The most visible fight has been between activists and the Sanitation District. The two sides disagree on virtually every point in the debate: Cost. Activists contend that the district's massive reserve fund -$477 million - is more than enough to pay for redesign of the treatment plant without increasing sewer fees. The district says any money tapped from reserves would, at some point, have to be replaced by raising fees. Science. District scientists say that so far, there is no evidence the plume has come closer to Huntington's shore than about one mile. It has drifted within half a mile of Newport Beach, but only at the bottom of deep offshore canyons, the district contends. Irwin Haydock, a former district scientist who has joined the activists'cause, says there are too many variables in temperature, currents and complex movement of water to rule out the possibility of contamination reaching the surf in Newport Beach, as well as Huntington. Treatment. Denial of the waiver would force the district to treat its sewage to a higher level. This level, known as "full secondary"treatment, removes most solid particles and more of the bacteria than the district's present treatment method. Activists say full secondary treatment would make the beach safe for swimming; district engineers and microbiologists say the gains would be modest and would not significantly affect any existing public health risk. They also point to signs that at least some of the bacteria may be coming from land-based sources, suggesting that full secondary treatment could bring even less benefit than activists hope. Seal Beach waiver opponent Doug Korthoff says the district's testing methods, involving the gathering of water samples in a grid pattern over large areas of ocean surface, is as full of gaps as a "picket fence." "It's like you're blindfolded, trying to catch a baseball," he said. The scientists and engineers who work for the district express frustration with such assertions. They say their$7 million search for evidence of the plume's effects has been thorough and diligent- more so than any other sanitation district in the state and, possibly, the nation. But the accusations against the district recently gained momentum from an unexpected source: the city of Huntington Beach. http://www.ocregister.com/newstwaiver00930oci3.shtmi 10/01/2001 Sewage disposal becoming heated debate Page 4 of 4 Spikes in ocean bacteria levels have been a serious concern in Huntington since the summer of 1999, when a four-month ocean closure cost local businesses possibly millions in tourist dollars. The cause has never been determined. But studies of possible causes continue. That has led to what looks like a public-relations battle between the city and the district-though both sides say they are simply trying to get to the bottom of the contamination issue. A recent survey by the district of possible sources of sewage leaks on land focused on the city, and turned up at least one leaky sewer pipe. That pipe is owned by the district, but another possible leak was found in a restroom pipe on the beach owned by the state parks department. District scientists say beach contamination may be the product of multiple, small sewer leaks on land. Huntington Beach seemed to go on the offensive. Saying the district may be too focused on searching for land sources, city officials released an analysis by a consultant, Komex Inc., of data gathered by the Sanitation District on the offshore plume in 1996 and 1999. The consultant says the data-gathering in those years was weak and full of gaps; the district says it improved testing methods in 2000 and 2001. Haydock, the former district scientist, says his superiors ignored, and perhaps concealed, a report he made in 1996 suggesting the bacterial plume could be coming close to shore, though the district denies that. Whatever the outcome of the waiver fight, public scrutiny of the Orange County Sanitation District appears to be more intense than at any time in its 57-year history. "People are suddenly aware of what happens once their waste water leaves their homes," said district spokeswoman Lisa Murphy. "They've never thought of it before. I would venture to say this is one of the most looked-at agencies in the county." rdN REGISTER WI he Om 5"burlbe todM Awbal I Enle] lnment I JobEinde[I OCCerFinde!I OCRe"ister I Home&GaMen I RealBtale I;inae$ce http://www.ocregister.com/news/waiver00930cci3.shtml 10/01/2001 ICI SURFRIDER f/\ FOUNDATION Dear Garry Streed, The Surfrider Foundation is leading the way to protect America's oceans and coasts, our most imperiled and important resource. Since 1984, we have fought to restore our coastlines to the pristine condition they were once in. Every year we evaluate the current threats to our oceans and strategically tackle the issues that need our full attention. Now, more than ever, we are focused on the increased development along our coasts, and the urban runoff and sewage treatment impacts that follow. It is clear that there exists a need for improved implementation of the Clean Water Act to reduce both point source and non-point source impacts to our coastal waters. The Surfrider Foundation is taking a proactive stance to address water quality issues. We recognize that it may take years to extinguish this problem, but we 1 believe our efforts and your continued support will provide long-term solutions. We are working to see the original vision of the Clean Water Act "no discharges" - become a reality. In 1972 the Federal Government passed the Clean Water Act whose mission was to "restore and maintain the chemical,physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters." The Clean Water Act was established as a national priority, ending the discharge of pollutants into our oceans from the land and outfall pipes in the sea. With funding and technical assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency, virtually every city in the U.S.was required to build and operate a wastewater treatment plant. In addition, each state had to adopt water quality standards, design plans for limiting industrial and municipal discharges, and act to protect wetlands. However, there exists a loophole of sorts - the 301(h)waiver. With 301(h) waivers, sewage treatment facilities can apply for a permit that would allow them to discharge more than the legal limit of sewage. The result is partially treated sewage being pumped directly into the ocean. We believe that this is a step backwards in the attempt.to keep our oceans clean. _ We need your help and support to eliminate these waivers and strengthen the Clean Water Act. We have already begun to see the affect of 301(h)waivers on water quality across the nation. From Puerto Rico to Orange County, California, and across the coastal United States, we have seen evidence o eTd gT�affon to our waters. This is a national water quality issue affecting our precious coastal ecosystems. Ecological Corridor threatens the third most important nesting ground for Leatherback s sea turtles in the Caribbean. This area has also been characterized as one of the healthiest maritime forests of its kind in Puerto Rico. This is a prime example of the = The Puerto Rico Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation has been adamantly fighting two large developments as well as illegal discharges from antiquated sewage treatment plants. Local towns, coral reefs and surfing areas are being polluted. Proposed development in the Northeastern impacts of over development affecting water quality - along a wild coast and interfering with our delicate ecosystem. _ NATIONAL OFFICE • 122 SOUTH EL CAMINO REAL,PMB 467 • SAN CLEMENTE,CA 92672 • (949)492-8170 FAX:(949)492.8142 ww.v.sorfrid,.org E-MAIL:infddsarfrider.org I (9 "Most people feel like they can't do anything about halting irresponsible coastal development. But people have seen that we can be effective five years ago, the harmful hotel development at Wilderness was supposed to be built in two months. It's still not there." Ricardo De Soto_ Chairman, Surfrider Foundation Puerto Rico Chapter In California,the Orange County Sanitation District is proposing to delay full secondary treatment of sewage that is dumped into the deep ocean off shore of the: Santa Ana River. By doing so they are violating the spirit and intent of the Clean Water . Act. They are asking for another extension of their 301(h)waivers that would allow the continued dumping of partially treated sewage into our ocean While requesting this waiver, the Sanitation District,with the assistance of the Surfrider Foundation's Huntington Beach Chapter is conducting a preliminary study into the mysterious sources of bacteria that continue to plague the surf zone in Huntington Beach. One objective of the study is to determine if the district's outfall is the source of recent beach closings. Exposure to this kind of partially treated sewage has serious health risks for surfers and other recreational enthusiasts and may cause significant harm to' our critical near shore marine ecosystems. These are two examples of problems that the Surfrider Foundation has been fighting for over seventeen years. In the past we have hit these issues head on and prevented development or stopped ocean pollution that was compromising our precious coastlines. We have spoken in front of countless city councils, state and federal govemmeuts, and the grand jury,sending a dear message that we will not allow anything to destroy OUR oceans. Can we count on you to speak up and make your voice heard? Do you want to sit back and hope the problem goes away? Or, do you want to do something about it and stand up for yourself and your children? These national water quality issues will not be resolved without your support. The Clean Water Act is being ignored and its implementation is being delayed and as a result our local waterways,beaches and oceans are being polluted. This act was passed so that our children, their children and all future generations after them would have an ocean as beautiful and thriving as the one our parents enjoyed. Let's work together to create an ocean that is cleaner for our children than the one we swim in today. By supporting the Surfrider Foundation,your donation will help us abolish 301(h)waivers and strengthen the Clean Water Act. The quality of our oceans depends on all of us. Thank you for your support and for contributing to the long-term solution for a clean ocean.. For a Cleaner, Healthier Ocean, Chad Nelsen Environmental Director Surfrider Foundation . California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region cool r o Winston H.Hiekox inknnn Address: hni JAvww.swscb.n.govhwscb8 •91MM L#Grrt.Z Cray Davis Secretaryfor 3737 Main Suer.Suim 500.R,.uk.Csliramin 92501-3346 3on avopsd �r Governor Enwromeenwl Phan,(909)7824130-FAX(909)78142H Proredon (_lSA I4i W" ne ena s ckalle facing Calif nio u real. Every Cnl%tan neck m take bnmailam action to reduce energy consumpdoe. For a Ifs,ofsin sk waysyou can reducedonsd and cut yaw a PV emu.see our webstle at www.swrcb.ea goWrwgeb8. October 5, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. James L. Denison 6931 E. 1ill St. Long Beach, CA 90815 RE: YOUR AUGUST 31, 2001 LETTER TO GOVERNOR DAVIS Dear Dr. Conner: Thank you for your August 31, 2001 letter to Governor Davis concerning the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)waiver of full secondary treatment (hereinafter referred to as the 301(h)waiver). The Governor has asked us to respond to your letter. Your letter requests that the Governor direct efforts to require OCSD to go to full secondary treatment as soon as possible. As you might expect, this is an extremely complicated matter that will be the subject of very intense scrutiny during the next couple of years. At this time, it is not even certain that OCSD will again apply for renewal of their current waiver. In the event that OCSD does apply for renewal of the waiver, the first decision in response to the application must be made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The OCSD wastewater effluent is discharged through a 5-mile long outfall at a location outside of the jurisdiction of the State of California. Therefore, USEPA must decide whether the 301(h)waiver will be granted. If USEPA decides to proceed with renewal of the 301(h)waiver, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (Regional Board), would then be asked to consider joint issuance with USEPA of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, which would include items for which the state has jurisdiction. Federal regulations and the California Water Code provide for an open public participation process as part of the consideration of NPDES permits in California. There will be ample opportunity during this process for interested parties to provide important input to USEPA and the Regional Board concerning renewal of the OCSD discharge permit. It is anticipated that both OCSD and the USEPA/Regional Board will hold public hearings on this matter, and we invite you to visit our web site and subscribe electronically to the Board's agenda announcements, which would identify the workshops or hearings that the Board will schedule concerning renewal of the waiver. Scientific input concerning this matter will assist the USEPA/Regional Board in their consideration of a revised NPDES permit for OCSD. California Environmental Protection Agency A Receded Pooer, Mr. and Mrs.James L. Denison -2- October 5,2001 Your letter also states that you "...are among the millions of Californians who are no longer able to take our children or visitors to our beaches because of the unnecessary pollution there". We believe that there are a number of inland and coastal sources that may significantly contribute to beach closures and postings in Southern California. These include sewage spills, urban runoff and natural sources, such as wetlands. In fact, beach closure data clearly show that beach closures are most often caused by spills of sewage from sanitary sewer systems. To address this most important cause of beach closures, the Regional Board anticipates the near-term consideration of general waste discharge requirements for all sanitary sewer system owners and operators. The general permit would set standards of performance against which all systems would be evaluated. There is no question that improved performance by sanitary sewer system operators would result in fewer beach closures. We anticipate that the Regional Board will consider this general permit at their December 7� meeting, and a copy of the draft permit will be posted to our web site at least 30 days in advance of that date. Should you have any additional questions concerning the general permit for sanitary sewer systems, contact me at 909-782-3284, and for questions concerning the OCSD permit, please contact Joanne Schneider, Environmental Program Manager, at 909- 782-3287. Sincerely, Ge rd J. Thibeault Executive Officer Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board CC. Regional Board Celeste Cantu, SWRCB Janet Hashimoto, USEPA Blake Anderson, OCSD California Environmental Protection Agency pA Reryckd P.N, ,eeeJc1 o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street P . O . Sox 190 California 9264E Robert F. Beardsley, P.E. Department of Public Works Director (714) 536.5431 October 9, 2001 Ms. Laura Yoshii Regional Administrator United States EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne St San Francisco, CA 94105 Dear Ms. Yoshii: At its September 17. 2001, meeting, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach passed and adopted Resolution No 2001.69, which relates to the discharge of wastewater into the Pacific Ocean. I've attached a copy of this 301(h)waiver resolution for your information. I can be reached at (714) 536.5437, 9 you would like to discuss it with me. i�/ �C� or Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Works RFB:cf An c Janet Hashimoto.EPA Water Administrator Blake Anderson,General Manager.OCSD Gerard Thiaeaull.Executive Officer,RWOCS,Santa Ana Region Ray Silver,City Administrator Elaine Kuhnke,Dept Analyst RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RELATING TO THE DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach is a member agency of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD); and OCSD is a special district that provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to 21 cities with about 2.35 million residents in central and northern Orange County, including the residents and businesses of Huntington Beach; and OCSD uses a 10' diameter Ocean Outfall to discharge approximately 236 million gallons per day of wastewater from OCSD's 2.35 million customers; and 50%of the wastewater discharged out the Ocean Outfall is wastewater treated to a primary treatment level and 50%is wastewater treated to a secondary treatment level; and The Ocean Outfall that sits 190' below the ocean surface about 4.5 miles offshore from the Santa Ana River mouth between Huntington Beach and Newport Beach; and This discharge creates a wastewater plume in the ocean that can be up to 6 miles long, 2 to 3 miles wide and 100 feet thick; and OCSD's 20-Meter Fecal Coliform Study in 1996 showed that the wastewater plume may— under certain wave, tidal, and current conditions—approach the shoreline where it can contaminate the beaches and swimming areas of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach; and The 1972 Federal Clean Water Act requires most Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) to treat all wastewater to full secondary levels before such wastewater can be discharged from a treatment facility; and The Act authorizes POTWs to request a waiver of this full secondary requirement from the US Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA) under Section 301(h)of the Act as long as the POTW can show that the less-than-full-secondary discharge does not harm the environment or harm public health; and OCSD requested and was granted a waiver under Section 301(h)by US EPA in 1985,with an extension granted in 1998; and The current waiver(as extended)expires on January 1, 2003; and As projected by a 1999 Environmental Impact Report associated with OCSD's Strategic Plan, full secondary treatment of wastewater reduces nearly all parameters of ocean pollution including levels of fecal coliform bacterial and viruses, and 1 PDA2001aewlu:DiscM1arge of Watewar<r to Ocr+n WLS 2001-0679 9/61OI Rea. No. 2001-69 Sanitation agencies in Los Angeles County have not applied for new waivers under Section 30I(h) and are in the process of treating all wastewater at full secondary levels; and All or a significant portion of the additional expense of constructing and maintaining facilities associated with full secondary treatment at OCSD will likely be home by the ratepayers of OCSD, including the residents and businesses of Huntington Beach; and Huntington Beach relies upon a safe,clean ocean to sustain its quality of life and its economic and tourism base; and The residents of Huntington Beach use the ocean and its beaches for health, recreation,and business endeavors,including fishing,boating, and swimming, Now,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That it hereby opposes any extension of or application for a waiver of full secondary discharge requirements under Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act by OCSD; and 2. That it hereby supports the full secondary treatment of all wastewater discharged into OCSD's Ocean Outfall,or some other technologically feasible method to improve the quality of the effluent and reduce the amount of bio solid sent out the outfall;and 3. That it hereby urges its resident and business population to join with the Council in advocating for safer, less environmentally impactful wastewater discharge into the Pacific Ocean and in recognizing and accepting the community-wide obligation and financial costs that lie therein. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of September .2001. ATTEST: 44y k w 7/ n 1 �)wQ re ti/f�ut/+ft. City Clerk pt-sY-pl Mayor REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City l 11 Inistrator City Attorney 2 PDA2001Radu:DwhaW ar Waler w m Ocan RLS 2001-0678 916MI Res. No. 2001-69 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of September, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Green, Boardman, Cook, Julien Houchen, Garofalo, Dettloff, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None G City Clerk and exofficio C erk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California The tonpo"orinan«A a a correct .M or so*row on dm in eia oMce. Nlaat 10 WNMlE-MT�� 20 Ol t Il • t 0 die „�t�a f Ningon laech. Callsrda. � � 0Y Doputy Press Release Pagel of 3 ❑ Please click here to return.to[he previous oaee. ❑ ❑ Press Release ❑ r!l OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR PR01:466 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 10/05/2001 GOVERNOR DAVIS PRAISES CREATION OF BREAKTHROUGH WATERSHED TASK FORCE 10/5/2001 Top Ten Watershed Protection Projects in State Recognized SACRAMENTO Governor Davis today applauded the creation of the Joint Task Force on California Watershed Management. The Task Force will evaluate watershed projects around the state and make recommendations for future programs that support these cooperative projects. Under the leadership of the Secretary of the Cal/EPA Winston H. Hickox, Secretary for Resources Mary D.Nichols,and State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB) Chair Art Baggett,the Task Force selected 10 exemplary watershed protection projects from 35 applications submitted from local groups around the state. "Protecting our watersheds is an important priority for California's environment," Governor Davis said. "This Task Force will help the state learn how to clean up and protect our watersheds by drawing on the experience of 10 highly successful grassroots watershed projects throughout California." The 10 projects range geographically from Humboldt Bay in Northern California to Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego. The announcement of the formation of the Task Force was made by Secretary Nichols and Chairman Baggett at Devil's Dam in Pasadena before they toured the 47-square-mile Arroyo Seco Watershed. The Arroyo Seco Watershed extends from the San Gabriel Mountains to downtown Los Angeles. The Arroyo Seco Foundation and North East Trees were honored as partners in the Arroyo Seco project,one of the 10 pilot watershed projects chosen for the Task Force. "Healthy watersheds, and watershed protection and restoration,are critical to California's environmental quality," Cal/EPA Secretary Winston H. Hickox said. "The joint efforts of this ❑ team-the S WRCB, Cal/EPA and the Resources Agency-are crucial for clean water and the ❑ file://C:\TEMP\Press Release.htm 10/10/2001 Press Release Page 2 of 3 health of our environment." The jointly administered task force will use these 10 watershed projects to evaluate the relationships of state and federal agencies to local watershed group efforts.The Task Force was established by AB 2117 (The Wayne Watershed Bill). The Resources Agency, Cal/EPA and the SWRCB are required to submit a report to the Legislature by February 1,2002,to evaluate the pilot projects and make recommendations supporting cooperative watershed projects. "The 10 selected watersheds showcase community-led efforts and diverse partnerships that are helping California to protect our natural resources," Secretary Nichols said. "The unique aspect of the Task Force is that grassroots watershed partnerships now have the opportunity to instruct and inform state agencies about ways to improve the protection and restoration of California's rivers and streams. "This study will help build regional cooperation and understanding of Califomia's role in watershed management," S WRCB Chair Art Baggett said. "Collaborative efforts among federal, state,and local agencies,local stakeholder groups,landowners and environmental groups will be a critical aspect for study by the Task Force. The intent is to develop scientifically-based watershed strategies that will allow California to protect its rivers and streams by making thoughtful,clear public policy decisions that involve landowners,local governments and other stakeholders." Another important goal of these studies is to help publicize the concept of a watershed,and its value as a way for people to understand the landscape and ecology of California. A watershed is an area of land that drains water,and everything in the water,to an outlet, typically a lake,bay or the ocean. Over the past decade, 'watershed protection partnerships' have gained popularity around the country and in California as a means to organize scientific data,engage local citizens and landowners in environmental stewardship and deliver programs and activities to improve natural ecosystems and community health.There arc more than 150 active community-led watershed partnerships in California. The 10 selected watersheds by the Joint Task Force on Watershed Management are(with counties): Humboldt Bay(Humboldt),Yuba River(Nevada), Clear Lake Basin(Lake), Tomales Bay(Merin),Codomices Creek(Alameda),Santa Clara Basin(Santa Clam), Elkhorn Slough(Monterey),Arroyo Seco(Los Angeles), Santa Ana River(Orange),and Los Penasquitos Lagoon(San Diego). Please link below to view the project list. Proiect list Back to Too of Page Please click here to return to the previous page. file://C:\TEMP\Press Release.htm 10/10/2001 IL4: ,,1 WIN M e ,.,, : . icy�aeprYrrla�+� �Y! �j�rrlYeual Resources Agency State water Resources Control Boaro 1416 Ninth St. Ste 1311 10011 St. 15"Floor Sacramento,CA M14 Sacramento, CA 95812 TO: Lindell Marsh Siemon, Larsen & Marsh 19800 MacArthur Blvd Ste. 1070 Irvine, CA 92612 July 27. 2001 Dear Lindell Marsh: Congratulations! The Resources Agency and The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)are pleased to notify you that-your projectwas selected-as-a PitaProject.undecAB_ _ 2117 (the Wayne Watershed bill) now known as the Joint Task Force for CaIdomla.Watershed Management Though only three projects were required,ten projects were selected based on the questionnaires submitted by local watershed groups. The projects were chosen to best represent the diversity of watershed projects in the State. These projects will be studied over the next few months and a report prepared for submittal to the Legislature by February 1, 2002. The process of studying your project wlfd irocive your completion of a second, More detailed questionnaire. This will be followed by an In-person interview between you and staff from the Resources Agency and the SWRCB. These interviews will be conducted in the targeted watershed, if possible, and will be based on Information provided in your questionnaires. Following the interviews, a written analysis of your project will be provided to you, You will also receive copies of the report to the Legislature. This study provides us the opportunity to report to the Legislature on the state of California's watersheds. Your watershed program has been selected to demonstrate one of the various ways in which watershed management Is accomplished in the State. This document will contain lessons learned'from the 10 watershed projects that we have selected. From the information you provide us, wo Intend to fashion recommendations to the Legislature regarding state support for watershed efforts. Attached is the list of the selected watershed projects. Please verify that the person named above Is the correct person to contact about this pilot project. Also ptease send you phone number and e-mail address to Ken Coulter at coulk9Ddwo.swrcb.ca.00v if you have not done so. Thank you again for your willingness to help us improve watershed management opportunities In California. Sincerely, Sincerely, �� Mary NI ols L Arthur gett Secretary Resources Agency State Water Resources Control Board SELECTED WATERSHED PROJECTs(AB 2117) 1. Humboldt Bay Watershed Action Plan and Enhancement Plan (Humboldt Co.)— Salmon and other fisheries are the focus of this project. The project is citizen led with help from DFG. This project has received two consecutive 319(h) grants and is one of the projects submitted with the longest history. 2. Yuba Watershed Collaborative Projects(Nevada Co.)—The Yuba River Watershed has a sophisticated watershed council structure that includes working with federal, state and local partners.This watershed effort will demonstrate the link between individual efforts and CalFed programs. 3. Clear Lake Basin Watershed Management Project(Lake Co.)—This submission was by far the most robust with data and qualitative information.This watershed has had a lot of successes and can demonstrate how large basin scale efforts are managed. 4. Tomales Bay/Laeunhws Creek(Mario Co.)—These two projects are within the same watershed and will be combined to demonstrate scale. 5. Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan (Alameda Co.)—This project is starting an ad hoc creek protection that is watershed-wide with the cooperation of federal, state and local entities to restore a self-sustaining steelhead run on this urban creek. 6. Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative(Santa Clara Co.)—This project is part of a RWQCB 2 pilot project whose objectives are focused on water quality. This is an opportunity to examine the Water Board's Watershed Management Initiative program. It is also an urban watershed. 7. Elkhorn Slough Watershed Permit Coordination Program (Monterey Co.)—This project demonstrated a watershed-wide permit coordination program. 8. Arroyo Seco Watershed Restoration Feasibility Study(Los Angeles Co.)—This watershed group is presently doing a comprehensive plan to restore this watershed in conjunction with the Park Service,the State Coastal Conservancy and other partners. This project will be used to demonstrate partnerships across agencies and between agencies and community groups. 9. Santa Ana River Watershed Program(Orange Co.)—This project is nested within a greater Santa Ana Watershed Authority. This group was self-started and self-governed and may provide some insight to how groups form and why. 10.Los Per}asauitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan and Program(San Diego Co.)—This project will give us the opportunity to study such as mitigation funds and projects, land use planning and local and state partnerships. THE Mt`V- ?h016%erEr_5 CavNtlt_ pR TtF*- CA+,,Je VAtte.y AP-EA am` Inland Valley Times I S ^r oE of �fSEti d QNA Got Feenstra? J C-MaE,nn mF � GR p„B�tc ure Milk Producers Council is s glad that it does PA V�2 (H1 ArT 1#Jr � $rl— IN A� P2tVhtitS rJl�/+YSTS Frup $aLVt1o.J Q.p,nJi,r,0LE C Glr"-4 lb By Douglas Heb�an/tloup.oe0aimarQINimea.cam -tp W!,.ZM IQ�AG/ ( ?(206L �LaK` Bob Feenstra knows what he's talking about.And what he's talking about are dairies. One minute he's on the telephone,pushing for a compost facility that will take cow manure from Inland Valley dairy farms,combine it with other waste and then convert it into fertilizer. The next minute,he's firing off letters to lawmakers slamming legislation that could endanger private property rights, including those of dairy farmers. One day he is in Washington at an hourlong meeting with U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman to discuss environmental issues of concern to Califomia's dairies. Another day he's talking tax relief for farmers with Gov. Gray Davis at a landmark Sacramento gathering. As executive director of the Milk Producers Council,Feenstra, 58, is the public face of the$1-billion dairy industry in the Inland Valley,representing about 200 dairy owners. While 350,000 to 400,000 Inland Valley cows complacently munch hay and allow machines to milk them,he's in perpetual motion,working the phones,talking to drop-in visitors and traveling to and from countless meetings. "Bob is a tremendous warrior on behalf of the dairy industry," said Geoff Vanden Heuvel,a council board member and consultant. "It's not just a job for him, it's a vocation,it's a way of life." "I can't think of a more powerful advocate for dairy owners and the dairy industry than Bob Feenstra," said San Bernardino County Supervisor Fred Aguiar,who grew up among dairies and whose district encompasses them. The license plate on Feenstra's white Cadillac Escalante says MILKBIZ. But he is not just a lobbyist and a spokesman;he's become an agent of change in a conservative industry once practically defined by its resistance to change. The shift is most notable in compliance with environmental regulations that dairy owners long resented. "We've led the nation in milk production,"Feenstra said recently. "Why not lead the nation in environmental correctness?" Jerry King,president of the Orange County Water District board of directors, said it wasn't always so. King spent almost 16 years on the state Regional Water Quality Control r Board and said Feenstra used to be confrontational with regulators. His favorite phrase was "see you in court,"King recalled. And the dairies would indeed sue. Now,Feenstra said, the words he prefers to use with regulators are, "work with us." When the industry walled itself off from the world "we set ourselves up to be pointed out as the bad guys," Vanden Heuvel said. Feenstra realized this and changed when he needed to,he said. Feenstra then helped persuade dairy owners to cooperate with regulatory agencies instead of fighting them, King said. "He took a little grief for it from time to time,"he said. The resistance was partly a question of Feemstma s style,Vanden Heuvel said, adding that he still has differences with Feenstra occasionally. "He's got a personality that some folks embrace and some folks just don't like,"he said. Feenstra admits he's a control freak. Whatever it took,King said, "slowly we began solving problems." More and more Chino Basin dairy owners are filing environmental forms properly and on time,detailing such matters as the amount of cow manure stored and removed from their farms,King said. "I think they became a whole lot better neighbors,"he said. The cooperation goes beyond mere paperwork. Rain runoff used to sweep down from the north through the dairies,carrying cow urine and manure downstream into Orange County. "We had royal flush after royal flush after royal flush,"Feenstra said. He has been instrumental in obtaining federal and county funding for storm drains and flood control basins to channel and capture the runoff. He's excited about an anaerobic digester under construction in Chino that will convert manure into electricity.The$10-million project was made possible by state and federal grants for which he lobbied. He's looking to expand the development of man-made wetlands that soak up treated dairy wash water—dairies use about I00 gallons a day to wash each cow. He's trying to put together dairies with unused land and an Orange County produce farmer who wants to expand his operations.Not only should all parties profit,but the dairies would look nicer bordered by vegetable farms,Feenstra said. And he's hustling to find customers in desert agricultural areas such as Blythe for some of the 1 million tons of cow manure generated each year in the Inland Valley. Cow manure contributes to water pollution and air pollution,the latter because manure generates ammonia that combines with other air pollutants to form particles that can lodge in the lungs and have been linked to higher death rates. The Chino Valley has some of the worst particulate pollution in the nation,according to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. That's just a short list of the environmental projects Feenstra and the council have a hand in. It isn't always easy for Feenstra to pull his punches with regulators, however. He steams over state Regional Water Quality Control Board officials who are going onto dairy farms without asking the owners first. "They either got to have permission or stay off the farms," he told the council's environmental assistant,Nathan de Boom. If Feenstra knows what he's talking about it,its because of his background. The son of a Dutch immigrant dairy farmer who arrived in Paramount in 1919, Feenstra grew up washing barns and feeding cows at home, then started milking 120 of them at age 14. The milking took 4 1/2 hours every day. His childhood life revolved around three things,he said. "It was church. It was school. It was the dairy." Feenstra started his own dairy as a young man, leaving college after 18 months because, he said,he was in a hurry to make his fortune.The work required 14-hour days. At age 26 he sold his Bellflower dairy to developers and sold his cows to several buyers, including Aguiar's mother. That same year, 1969,Feenstra learned the Milk Producers Council,then headquartered in southern Los Angeles County,was looking for a new executive director.He applied. But he was sure other applicants would have college degrees and would outshine him,he said. He was forgetting his strong ties to the Dutch and Portuguese dairy community in which he grew up and his father's active role in that community. When he arrived for his interview, "I knew everybody at the table,"he said. The council then was largely a lobbying organization that focused on testifying before the California Department of Food and Agriculture on milk prices. Feenstra told the board of his dream of turning the council into a dairy service organization. He got the position. "I was bred for this job," said Feenstra, who is 6 feet 3 and supremely self-confident. But he's not impervious to others'opinions of him. "When I'm not liked, I bleed like a stuck pig,"he said. Feenstra keeps dairy owners apprised of important legal and political matters and lobbies on their behalf at the local, state and national levels. But the service he provides also includes business consulting.For example, he will match a dairy owner looking to expand with a dairy owner looking to sell cows and equipment. "I'm paid to know the gossip," Feenstra said. Early on,he had the good fortune of finding strong mentors, including his immediate predecessor at the council,Frank Vicencia, who eventually became the state Assembly's speaker pro tem,and another dairyman-tumed-assemblyman,Joe Gonsalves,who later became an influential lobbyist. They and others took Feenstra under their wing and taught him how to build relationships in government,he said. Aguiar,who served the Inland Valley as an assemblyman 1992-98, said Feenstra was a familiar presence in Sacramento and showed keen lobbying skills. "Bob was persistent," he said. "But one thing about Bob: If you told him no, he accepted it and moved on." Still,that was a rare occurrence,Aguiar said. "You don't tell Bob Feenstra no very often,"he said. As the dairies in Paramount,Bellflower and Cerritos relocated to the Chino Basin amid increasing urbanization in Los Angeles County,Feenstra moved with them.They now represent the largest concentration of dairy cattle in the world. Feenstra's job is hectic and the high-pressure work eventually took a toll on him. "I smoked like a banshee," he said, citing a three pack-a-day habit. Eleven years ago in December,he had to undergo quadruple bypass surgery. A pastor friend prayed over him and "I haven't smoked a cigarette since," he said. He quickly returned to work.Now he's been there so long some Milk Producers Council board members are the grandchildren of board members who hired Feenstra. He continues to push for the industry and is proud of the meeting he and two top officials of the Inland Empire Utilities Agency had with Veneman in August, he said. He knew Veneman when she was Gov. Pete Wilson's secretary of food and agriculture. In Washington, they discussed pilot projects to find beneficial uses for manure and wash water. The recent meeting with Davis was also critical,Feenstra said,because it was the first time the governor had met with top agriculture industry representatives.The industry largely supported former Arty. Gen. Dan Lungren for governor in 1998. Davis recently signed a bill giving tax breaks on purchases of farm equipment, such as tractors, the immediate topic of the meeting. Feenstra has known Davis for years,however. The two cooperated back in the mid-1980s when Davis was an assemblyman pushing to put photographs of missing children on milk cartons,Feenstra said. It's those kinds of connections,built during years in the trenches,that will be hard to replace when Feenstra steps down one day,Vanden Heuvel said. "Sometimes I like to feel I'll be missed when I'm gone,"Feenstra said. "Bob is appreciated,"Vanden Heuvel said. "He will be missed"when he retires. Three years ago the council created the position of environmental specialist,which 25- year-old de Boom has filled ever since. He said working with Feenstra has been a great education. "What Bob does well," he said, "is he tells the story of the dairy industry." iornra a ,Da.ya�i���m „,,,,e"�sAn Arizona `�c�J FORY�00 UR BY 0 O GpUr7GIL Ejc1 Guest Column Mly 8 BOVI5Gf' by Bob Fees stra Relationships for success We hope to Working In the dairy Industry in Southem marketing suategies for co-composting of hu- develop a California for over 30 years,I have encountered man waste and row,mannre.From that partner- my share of frustrations. Although then has ship we have developed an innovative proposal national-- -'- bun'"madyexadw of dairies leaving the ama-- to anaerobic digeasen,.fteledswith-4;1,Iry_, model for over the year decade,approximately 300 dairies manure, biotolids generated fmm regional t still operate in southern California,pnedomi. sewage treatment facilities,and green material dairy nztelyin the Chino ants."me that menom,for from local homes.parks and landscape maimc- -producers to vlasever reason,are faced with escalating emj-- merm,to,generate methane gas to comenc into momenta]restrictions and the coat associated an environmentally clean source of power. In use across with mecting them. addition,the proposed project will help clean the United Our of the biggestand mostfruatntinScal- up and protect the regions groundwater sup- StatPS Imgs cortfroodngthe dairy industryin South- plies andprovide significant air qualitybrnehts eat California today is the cost of handling Bq- forSouthem California. aid and solid manure With rapid urbanization In our efforts to address liquid manure dh- cawing more and mere farmland to go out of posal related issues, MPC has partnered with production, and with local water regulations IBUA, Orange County Sanitation District, prohibiting the sprevding of manure solids in Western Municipal Water District and Sana the dairy area, the cost of managing manures Am Watershed Project Authority to design and has aigrdfrcandyincrresedThis coat in the near install sewer connections for dairies.The infor- ti ' <r future may make dairying in southern Califar- motion collected during the"pilot project'will Yfi not economically prohibitive help In the evaluation of severing the remain- L'II I Unfortunately, until now the uawer to our ing dairies in the Chino Basin. •Bob rrrolrnis mature challenge has been based on short- rtrmcodroDtrubm term fires that have inadequately addressed the Notjuat one solution FMak Produnn everaupply of manure in the area These short- Sewcring dairies is one of several projects '- .•inou- term fixes not only prevent development of of that contribute to liquid manure management. rode,Calif.flake Earn longterm solutions, but also prevent Other projects include urban flood control, bemasPeMuan development ofpublir investments necessary to groundwater desalting, constructed wetlands, FortgdderMCdl-, support such a solution. and ondairy management programs. fordad.Mai Arm t%9asd These projects are m essmtial step in Wines- and solutions mg same bug-terra solutinw In the handling j3�us Y If cost-efficient dairying a to remain viable of manure These projects were note they forddryprodm mtY�B P 1 e a: kee.eammd for Southern California,we art Eased with the have taken enormous amounts of time and ef- rahedonoddry question of how to develop effective long-term fort,and theyme far from complete. itparamnttm, solutions.To address this issue,it is my belief In establishing these partnerships and pwi- - Bobhnewjonas that we,must explore the possibility of forming ects our goal is mofold:First,and most impor- Wvlytobefound relationships with public agencies that daily motly, we prolong the economic viability of P-"gthe haW of deal with problems misting to human waste dairying in southern California for those pro- thecapitalbuild. disposal.Municipalities.that treat human waste ducats who either wish to dairy here for a long imgalussus in southern California have dealt with disposal period of time or are waiting for opportunities manseardwmh. issues far longer than the dairy industry In In dairy elsewhere.ground,there will robabl Iogear,ox,ae 6e ry eY rY Probably w Wngdhr mgk fact,they compete for some of the same agri never be another.Chino with let unique dairy. thepssmeewf cultural array to dspame was eresidues ing idiosyncrasies and its class proximity to Chaereodon Milk Producers Council and the Southern majorurban and subuthancommunitiea.Sivd- rade. CaBforwa dairy industry formed a partnership [at situations, however,can occur and are w- aMykprodi�wslJ wirhthe Inland Empire Utilities Agency(IhUA), tarring throughout the West. Therefore, we - roocliesmbs awasawa[et and water, wholesale utility that hopemdevelop anatioml model fordairypm r searlmdat(909) mcma 70D,000 people in the Chino Basin, to duarsmuseacrotatheUnitedSmoswismad- 6286D1& help address regional manure issues. For sew- dressing issues concerning the management of ii - and year.we have worked with IHUA toeve develop manuresi e:w nincrieglyurbmenvimnmenmil�f, CIS 0 CA/AZ a Wutene.iryeud,wr Seprembw9a01 • ��+� .. — (Alf'tA'rNQt�cC�O� t •/�/v I / /-tr• 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,IRVINE EERRELEY DAVIS • IRVINE LOS ANDEL65 • MFALED RIVEp31DE . SAN dEGD • SAII FlIANCIXO � �' O SAMN BARRI.RA • 5/.NTA QD2 S The Henry Samueli School of Engineering Irvine,CA 92697.2175 r/O Department of Civil&Environmental Engineering (949)824.5333 16/00 / (949)824-2117 COPt'g To October 2,2001 NICKAR ✓�S tser- �Er, ifcr�.,ava� Dear Colleague: tK=r—Apt"e5:5 On behalf of the CEE Affiliates and the students and faculty of the Departme of Civil and Environmental Engineering, you are invited to the next CEE Affiliates Quarterly Meeting on Friday, November 2,2001—"INFRASTRUCTURE—IT'S NOW OR NEVER". As you know,the quality of life and our economic development depends critically on how we develop, maintain, and improve our basic infrastructure systems. On November god,Vitally Troyan, City Engineer for Los Angeles will assess Los Angeles' infrastructure; Sarah Layton, Executive Vice President for CaIRAC and an infrastructure specialist will discuss how Ca1RAC is spreading the word regarding the need to update our infrastructure systems; and Steve Bucknam,President of Bucknam and Associates and long time member of our CEE Affiliates will talk on his work with clients and legislature to receive the necessary support. The CEE Department and its CEE Affiliates at UCI have been sponsoring a long series of quarterly seminars dealing with infrastructure planning, design and management. I hope you can join us at this latest seminar on November 2od, and I look forward to seeing you at the meeting. A full buffet breakfast will be served at 7:00 a.m., and the cost is$15 at the door(cash or check please). Please RSVP to Jayne Hess at(949) 824-4757, irhessauci.edu by Tuesday, October 30d'. Sincerely ours, j (M. �t�, �` Scherfig I/n $tofessor and Vice Chair Enclosure CI c.T _4 ill Ic- I? ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT You are cordially invited to University of California, Irvine CIVIL. AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENG119EERiNG AFFILIATES FALL QUARTERLY MEETING "INFRASTRUCTURE —IT'S NOW OR NEVER" Friday, November 2, 2001 University Club 7:00 a.m. -9:00 a.m. AGENDA 7:00am-Registration&Full Buffet Breakfast 7:30 a.m.-Introduction 7:45 a.m. -Program 8:45 a.m. - Questions and Answers 9:00 a.m. -Adjourn Ovenine Remarks Yazdau Emrani- President- CEE Affiliates School of Engineerine Update Professor Nicolaos G. Alexopoulos-Dean, Henry Samuel! School of Engineering Department Update Professor Masanobu Shinozuka - Chair, Department of Civil& Environmental Engineering iii#Niigi#Miiq###i##M#iiii##+F###i Moderator Yazdan Emrani, Senior Vice President, Berryman & Henigar "Condition Assessment of Los Angeles' Infrastructure" Vitaly Troyan,P.E.,City Engineer, City of Los Angeles "Getting the Message Out" Sarah Layton,Executive Vice President, California Rebuild America Coalition(CalRAQ "Working with Clients and Legislature" Steve Bucknam,President, Bucknam &Associates RSVP by Tuesday, October 30, 2001 to Jayne Hess at 949-824-4757, irbess(dactedu Admission: $15 at the door, cash or make checks payable to UC Regents CEE Students Free t°c. C P m nwf WnV MY 1VViU4 A CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL a ENGINEERING AFFILIATES ° .v """ °""' �� ° t� • 2001-2002 9 ` ■ .� i",' ANenev/Comnanv Members 8 •"a• �� �,�.*� �e 0 Advanced Earth Sciences,Inc. � C Caltrans,District 12 r ■" , Carollo Engineers ti: is �j• �►/ CH'M(` Hill Geo-Environmennal, Inc. Hwtt Zollars nib J Irvine Community Development Company Z11% ,,,� ►,yTdr4 � �� ��!y ;'�°:„'. ^ � Irvine Ranch Water District „ W, 1 m� � ••,�,o, 4 JHTM&Associates Kleinfelder,Inc. ll�t•�■,,,,JJ LSA Associate, Inc. c.�w ®�.. •a F. bk w..._c—,,•:t'w� .�,"°� ,a � Psomas „•, m. Q ,� 1 • a RBF Consulting A Tetra Tech ASL m •c•n,u+d ` lrnw �+�' !�,/s Willdan db ,o Zeiscr Kling Consultants, Inc. pit s =a` ♦ � '<a,"•'E a,s Individual Sponsors c .., " -� +■g g °iM n �,.a Daniel Boyd Russ Lighfpp ��� y °^`• f'a° C. Stephen Bucknam Klmo Look ao °. t , �+u 4.•.�_ w`' j°� Lames Cathcart Derek McGregor Steve Gordin Kathy Ryder nt<•��• y g r<"°r' `F•� Charlie Guess Robert Sherwood 3 Khatha Hadipaur Peter Supko University of CEE AFFILIATES Raymond Hester John J.Tracy FALL QUARTERLY MEETING Steve Keel Dan White California, Irvine , Friday, November 2, 2001 rvvx+ nu sex Location: University Club Y Parking: Lot IBB — Free IfTr 1 � r e •i CITY 0F ANAEiEIM,CALIFORNIA Public.Utilities Department 1 • September 10, 2001 Mr. William R. Mills,Jr. General Manager Orange County Water District P.O. Box 8300 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Re: Rate of Progress on the Eleven Milestones and Conditions for the Groundwater Replenishment System Dear Mr. 7""' I am concerned by the slow rate of progress to suitably complete the groundwater producers' eleven milestones and conditions for the GWRS project. In particular, I am concerned by the lack of significant progress toward determining the availability of long-term MWD replenishment water and completing regularly scheduled quarterly financial model updates on a timely basis as originally agreed. As a result, I would like to suggest that the GWRS staff establish an action plan for each of the eleven milestones and conditions to facilitate their timely completion. Each action plan should include, at a minimum,the following: • Designated lead person responsible for its completion. • Clearly defined set of'deliverables'. • Timelines and due dates for all deliverables. Since many of the design activities for the GWRS project contain the above components,it should be reasonable to expect the same level of planning and management oversight for the eleven milestones and conditions. However, in the absence of such oversight, I believe that many of the milestones and conditions may not be satisfactorily completed prior to the planned award date for major GWRS construction contracts. Consequently, given that both the OCWD and OCSD Boards' commitment to the groundwater producers to complete all eleven milestones and conditions and to evaluate their impacts on the GWRS project prior to award of any major construction contracts, all further GARS activities would need to be suspended until this important step is completed. (714)765-5137 • w .anaheim.net 201 S.Anaheim Blvd.,Suite 1101,Anaheim,CA 92805 \\U CAF1\SYS\DEP MgJ\'Ne\e Svcs\Warer(kgmima Rogrtu.dx •Mr. William R. Mills,Jr. 1 September 10,2001 Page 2 of 2 In order to prevent this potentially avoidable delay,I request your assistance to facilitate the timely and thorough completion of the groundwater producers' eleven milestones and conditions. Sincerely, Donald C. Calkins Assistant General Manager— Water Services CC: Blake Anderson Iry Pickler Tom Dawes Pat Scanlon Marcie Edwards GPI w/10/01 Groundwater Replenishment System Construction Contracts Schedule October 2001 Estimated Cost (including Complete Design Contract Complete Construction Contract contingencies) Solicit Bida) Award Construction 1. MF Equipment Preselection (assigned to Temp MF&AWiF Contracts) $32,500,000 Oct-01 Jan-02 Nov-05 2. UV Equipment Preselection (assigned to AWTF Contract) $10,250,000 T Nov-Ot Feb-02 Nov-Oil 3.AWTF Temporary MF and Site Piping $4,400,000 Ma -02 Jul-02 Mar-03 4.AWTF Initial Site Electrical& Permanent Substation $2,100,000 Mar-02 Ma -02 Jan53 5.AWTF Category 1 Demolition $1,600,000 Au -02 Oct-02 Jun-03 6.AWTF Piles and Foundation Preparation $5,600,000 Aug-02 Nov-02 Au -03 7. Advanced Water Treatment Plant(AWTF) $221,900.000 Feb-03 Jun-03 Nov-05 8. SCE Work for Permanent Substation $2,300,000 Oct-01 Oct-01 Jan-03 9. Southeast Barrier Pipeline $2,500,000 Nov-01 Jan-02 Deo-02 - 10. Barrier Wells Drilling,Wellhead Facilities and Ellis Barrier Pipeline $8.100,000 Jul-02 Oct-02 Nov-04 11. GWR Pipeline Reach 2 -Lacy Jail Pipeline $1,600.000 r-01 Jun-01 Dec-01 12. GWR Pipeline Reach 1 $25,800,000 Dec-02 Mar-03 Ma -OS 13. GWR Pipeline Reach 2 $20.200,000 A r-02 Jun-02 Mar-04 14. GWR Pipeline Reach 3 $19,400,000 Jun-02 Aug-02 Jan-05 ATempos PM &CM Offices&Contractor Laydown Area $800,000 Nov-01 Dec-01 Feb-02 TOTAL(Items 3 through 15) $316,300,000 1. MF and UV Equipment costs included in Item 7 , 2. AWiF Operational Date-End of construction February 2006 with Category 2 Demolition and final site work completed. AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING October 24, 2001 —7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the spec item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 10/24/01 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made,the minutes for the regular meeting held on September 26, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/01 09/30/01 Totals $5.329,383.79 $5,366,584.31 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. } 10/24/01 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re October 24, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 26, 2001 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re October 3, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 3, 2001 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re October 4, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 4, 2001 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063,with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$5,345 and 30 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $182,345; and (2)Accept Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. (1)Approve a budget increase of$9,079,600 for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37,for a total project budget of$84,629,600; (2) Approve plans and specifications for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and(4)Award a Construction Contract to Margate Construction, Incorporated, for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. Pt-37, for an amount not to exceed $70,366,000. e. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$551,500 for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, for a total project budget of$795,800; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services for the conceptual design (Phase 11)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84,for an additional amount of$272,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$428,800. f. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$350,000 for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7,for a total project budget of$2,732,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. i 10/24/01 Page 4 g. (1) Establish a new budget of$440,000 for Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8, from the Orange County Sanitation District's Capital Reserves; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Sole Source Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee to prepare an update to the 1999 Strategic Plan for a total amount not to exceed $350,000. h. Approve an increase to the approved sole source equipment purchase with Hatch & Kirk Incorporated for an additional amount of$9,400,for a total amount not to exceed $122,260, in connection with Central General Automation, Job No. J-79. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the October 10, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 10, 2001 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2001. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-18, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. e. Approve the Agreement to Establish the Purchase Price for, and the Purchase of, A 2.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Capacity Right for Desalter Brine with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority,for a total amount of $5,252,015.26, and direct staff to continue to negotiate with SAWPA to resolve flaws in the 1996 agreement. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re October 22, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on September 10, 2001, September 24, 2001 and October 8, 2001 to be filed. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-19, Establishing a Policy and Procedure for Disclosure of Contacts or Communications Between the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Members and Prospective Consultants, Suppliers, and Contractors Bidding for Work in Connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System. d. Approve agreement between Orange County Water District (OCW D) and Southern California Edison, to design, build, and maintain a dual-feed 66/12kV substation in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,for a total cost of$2,396,000,with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) having equal shares in the amount of$1,198,000 for the capital costs, and with OCWD having sole responsibility for the annual maintenance cost of approximately$83,000 per year. ' 10/24/01 Page 5 e. 1(a) Authorize issuance of Request for Proposals for pre-selection of microfiltration (MF)equipment estimated at a cost of$32,500,000 to be equally shared by the Orange County Water District(OCWD), and the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD), subject to final approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel; 1(b) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the MF equipment manufacturer to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of $500,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD; and, 1(c) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the MF equipment to the contract to install the temporary MF system and to the main contract to install the permanent MF system based on the selected vendor proposal with a total estimated capital cost of $32,000,000. 2(a) Authorize issuance of Request for Proposals for pre-selection of ultraviolet light(UV)equipment estimated at a capital cost of$10,250,000 to be equally shared by OCWD and OCSD, subject to approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel; 2(b) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the UV equipment manufacturer to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of $250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD; and, 2(c) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV equipment based on the selected vendor proposal with a total estimated capital cost Of$10,000.000. 16. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-20, Authorizing Salary and Benefit Continuation for Military Reservists Called to Active Duty Relating to Presidential Executive Order of September 14, 2001. 17. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potenfial litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the Califomia Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 10/24/01 r Page 6 a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel-Anticipated Litigation, California Government Code Section 54956.9(c): One (1) potential case. 2. Convene in closed session to discuss new security measures for District facilities, California Government Code Section 54957 3. Convene in closed session to review and approve General Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and Compensation, California Government Code Section 54957.6. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for November 28, 2001. 21. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS:To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or 714 962-2411. ext. 7130 G:twp.0ta genWBo M AgeM s12001 BwM AgendaM102401 agerMa.0oc a we d Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 v� N� SANlTgT�oy p o a Fcr'a� THE EN�`Q�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 v 09/26/01 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,was held on September 26, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., in the Districfs Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonton X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Jahn Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBoll X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley Beth Krom X Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff A Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith A Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Dolan; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Rich Schlegel; Kim Christensen; Kelly Christensen; Chuck Frye OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel; Alternate Director Alberta Christy; Don Hughes; Kris Hardeman; Irwin Haydock; Jan Vandersloot; Doug Korthof; Don McGee; Dennis Baker; Don Schulz; Larry Porter; Glen and Camille Christenson; Kelly and Nicole Schlegel; Terry Lane; Art Perry Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 r 09/26/01 PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver: Jan Vandersloot; Don McGee; Larry Porter, Dennis Baker, Doug Korthof; Kits Hardeman; Irvin Haydock. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode announced the next workshop was scheduled for Saturday, November 3,from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Discussions will be on the ocean discharge permit. It was also announced that the next quarterly workshop on the groundwater replenishment system project would be held at the Orange County Water District on Saturday, November 171°. Service awards were then presented to employees Rich Schlegel, Kim Christensen and Chuck Frye for 20 years of service to the District. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the ocean testing was completed. All the data must be analyzed and put into a report that should be available in March. He urged the Directors to attend the workshop on November V as this would assist them in their policy-making decision the level of treatment the District is to provide. He then recognized Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, who outlined the steps and timeframe that needed to be taken before a decision was made for the level of treatment. Directors requested a one-page summary of the timeline of events to be provided to them. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff referred the Directors to the annual litigation status report included in their meeting folders that evening. It was also reported that a legislative status report would be forthcoming. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held August 22, 2001 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 08/15/01 08/31/01 Totals $7,461,799.16 $4,344,273.30 Director Leyes abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 09/26/01 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Petition for Writ of Mandate re Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01CC11349, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside Financial Corporation (Specification No. L-009-1)for a month-to-month lease of the southern 4-acre portion of the 18-acre property located at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the City of Fountain Valley, for a maximum of 90 days ending on November 30, 2001 at a monthly fee of$1,927.08. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the September 26, 2001 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 22, 2001 to be filed. C. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Boyd, Chair of the Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee, re the August 29, 2001 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 29, 2001 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the September 5, 2001 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve an increase to the contract with Kemiron Pacific, Inc.for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, providing for an increase of$300,000, for a total amount not to exceed $2,700,379 for the period ending November 30, 2001; and, (2)renew the contract for one additional year ending November 30, 2002, providing for a unit rate increase per dry ton for a total unit price of$321.43, including sales tax and delivery, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $2,535,000, and approve subsequent renewals provided the unit cost remains unchanged. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 09/26/01 ° d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve additional District funding for Cooperative Projects for FY01-02 related to inflow and infiltration reduction totaling $826,018, as recommended by the Guidance Review Committee, increasing the total FY01-02 amount from $1,729,195 to a total amount of $2,555,213. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to utilize Riverside County's competitively bid muiti-agency contract and execute an agreement with ASAP Software, Inc.,for licensing Microsoft personal computer software, for a three-year period effective October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2004,for a total amount not to exceed $482,789. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the September 6, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held September 6, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Grit Removal System, Job No. J-52, with Norman A. Olsson Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$9,387 and 219 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$820.934;and (2)Accept Grit Removal System,Job No. J-52, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J42, providing additional engineering services for benefit/cost evaluation, computer systems training, tagging services and calibration database, for an additional amount of $1,625,874, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,362,598. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers, for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, providing additional design services, for an additional amount of$221,785, increasing the total amount not to exceed $554,497. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager, or his designee, to award a sole source purchase order for 28 Sentinel Scrubber Gas Monitors from Vapex, Incorporated for an amount not to exceed $620,575, for materials, taxes and freight, in connection with Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve a budget transfer of the total remaining project budget of$2,802,000 from Job No. J-31-4 to Job No. P1-40-1/Job No. P247-1; (2) Close Job No. J-314; (3)Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro for design and Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 09/26/01 construction support services required for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems, and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1,Job No. P140-1; Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems, and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 2,Job No. 13247-1, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $574,270,for a total amount not to exceed $2,281,748; and (4)Approve a budget increase for Job No. P1.40-1/Job No. P247-1 of$1,500,000 from the District's Capital Improvement Program Reserves for a total budget of$6,917,000. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the September 19, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held September 19, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 2001. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Debt Policy relating to short-and long-tens borrowing by the District. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meetings held on September 10 and September 24, 2001. The Chair ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on August 13,2001 and August 27, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an agreement between Orange County Water District and NCG Porter Novelli for the next phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System public information and education program for a two year period, with two one-year extensions at an amount not to exceed $900,000 per year. OCWD and OCSD have equal costs in the amount of $450.000 per year. Director Leyes opposed. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the Orange County Water District(OCWD)to solicit bids for temporary office facilities in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36; (2)Authorize OCWD to award a contract to the low bidder in an amount not to exceed $800,000 and approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount with OCSD and OCWD paying equal shares of$400,000; and(3)Authorize OCWD to issue necessary Purchase Orders in accordance with OCWD Purchasing Policy to provide desks, chairs, file cabinets, shelves, computers, and other furnishings and equipment for the temporary office Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 09/26/01 r facilities,for a total of all purchase orders not to exceed $300,000, with OCSD and OCWD paying equal shares of$150,000. Director Leyes opposed. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the Orange County Water District(OCWD)to execute rights-of-way acquisition and relocation agreements and other necessary documents in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, in a form approved by OCWD's General Counsel in the aggregate amount of$1,000,000, upon approval of each expenditure by the Joint Cooperative Committee,with OCSD and OCWD paying equal shares of$500,000. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary, (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-25; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (4)Reject all bids; and (5)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25(Rebid). 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. for purchase orders issued to Sancon Engineering in connection with the Huntington Beach Onshore Investigation, Phase 3,for a total amount not to exceed $318,375. 18. The Chair declared a recess of the Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District, at 8:16 p.m. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 09/26/01 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation (OCSDFC)was called to order on September 26, 2001, at 8:16 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DBBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley Beth Krom X Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff A Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith A Paul Walker Kenneth Blake APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the meeting held on August 23, 2000 be deemed approved, as mailed. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed,gave a verbal report on the progress the OCSDFC made during the past year. Accomplishments include obtaining a AA category stand alone credit rating; refunded $12.4 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 09/26/01 million of 6.36%fixed rate debt; refunded $164.3 million VRDO (Gary?);extended the maturity three years, purchase value cost of$175,000 but lower annual payments of$2 million per year; issued reimbursement COPs of$35.7 million; and the VRDO rate from 8/23/00 to 8/31/01 was 2.79%. Currently the Finance Corporation is seeking a financial advisor; obtained formal approval by the FAHR Committee for a debt policy; and the current adopted budget includes $280 million for a COP issue. The Finance Corporation will be looking to evaluate the use of borrowing, evaluate competitive v. negotiated sales, user fee increases to cover debt service, and additional meetings held to approve future issues. In response to Directors questions it was clarified that the OCSDFC would report their actions through the FAHR Committee. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation adjourned at 8:26 p.m. RECONVENE: The Chair of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District reconvened the meeting at 8:26 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:29 p.m. r/r 1 Secretary Ithe Board rectors of Orange County Sanital Zr District G:twp.dblagendaS=d Minuteat2001 Board Mlnuteat092601 mint .dm Claims Paid From 08101101 to 08115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 37603 Air Products&Chemicals 6 25,039.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-M 37604 Applied Ocean Sciences 27,792.00 Professional Services-HB Shoreline Contamination Investigation Phase III 37605 Black&Veatch Corporation 144,661.85 Engineering Services Pl-76&J-71-3 37606 Burch Ford 180,170.00 (8)2001 F-150 Trucks 37607 BP Energy Company 240,086.65 Natural Gas-Spec.No.990D-28 37608 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 30,343.63 Engineering Services P2.82,J-71-1 If J-71.2 376M City of Huntington Beach 43,634.00 Cooperative Projects J-73 37610 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 90,628.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 37611 Kemmm Pacific,Inc. 140,719.13 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 37612 Lee&Ro,Inc. 34,150.00 Engineering Consulting Services 5-49,5-50,5-51 &5-52 37613 Orange County Water District 64,981.03 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 37614 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 130.398.25 Engineering Services J-42 37615 Southern California Edison 91,909.95 Power 37616 SAW PA 25,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana Sucker Conservation&Recovery Fund 37617 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 152,891.90 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 37618 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 38,586.37 Hydrogen Peroxide 37619 The Yakima Company 56.452.09 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 37620 Ark Construction Company 33,408.00 Construction-Enclose Open Bay at Pit. 1 Warehouse 37621 J W Contracting Corporation 256,500.00 Construction P2-60 37622 Margate Construction,Inc. 423.739.00 Construction P2.39,J-71.1 &J-71.2 37623 Union Bank of California 28,500.00 Construction P2.60,Retention 37624 A-Plus Systems 3,186.86 Notices&Ads 37625 Aearo Company $1.00 Safety Supplies 37626 Air Liquide America Corp. 1,689.53 Specialty Gasses 37627 Airbome Express 125.50 Air Freight 37628 Airgas Safety 548.41 Safety Supplies 37629 American Airlines 5.076.31 Travel Services 37630 Analytical Technology,Inc. 1.733.85 Pump Supplies 37631 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 150.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 37632 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 2,200.00 Toxicity Testing 37633 Aquent,Inc. 3.725.00 Temporary Employment Services 37634 Asbury Environmental Services 275.00 Waste Oil Removal 37635 AG%Corporation 3,655.63 Gauge 37636 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 94.10 Telephone Service 37637 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,711.47 Cellular Telephone Service 37638 AWFS 2001 60.00 O&M Training Registration 37639 Ban Commercial Door Repair,Inc. 6,778.49 Roll-Up Door Replacement at Pit,2 37640 Battery Specialties 346.75 Bananas 37641 Beckman Coulter,Inc. 1.369.00 Instrument Maim.Service 37642 Bently Nevada Corporation 371.96 Instrument Supplies 37643 RP9Bio Gro 11.450.76 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 37644 Boeing-Anaheim 670,00 Reconciliation User Fee Program 37645 Borthwick,Guy,Beeenhausen 3.173.45 Professional Services P2-84 37646 Broughton Systems 3,995.00 Professional Services FIS Phase II 37647 C.T.Sedate,PhD..P.E. 975.00 Professonal Services 241 Page 1 of 12 Claims Paid From 08101/01 to 08/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37648 Cal Protection 1.012.00 Maintenance Agreement Halon Fire System at Pit.2 37649 Caltrol,Inc. 365.82 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37650 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 21,687.65 Engineering Services Jd0-3,2-31 &3.52 37651 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 37652 Carollo Engineers 4,134.89 Engineering Services-High Rate Pump Installation on Digester R 37653 City of Fountain Valley 14,715.13 Water Use 37654 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 5,956.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37655 Consolidated Freighhvays 203.98 Freight 37656 Consolidated Plastics Company 287.44 Lab Supplies 37657 Cooper Energy Services 2,175.94 Engine Supplies 37658 Corporate Express Imaging 3.943.10 Computer Supplies 37659 Corporate Express 765.95 Office Supplies 376W Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 716.17 Custodial Services Spec No.9899-09 37661 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 4,794.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37662 County Wholesale Electric Co. 9,438.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37663 Custom Control Sensors 141.95 Electrkal Supplies 37664 CASA 1,375.00 Administration Meeting Registration 37665 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 1,000.00 Lab Analysis 376W CSUSB-Conference Connection 500.00 Sponsor-Sharing the Waters 37667 CWEA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 37668 DeZurk do Misco/SouthWesl 13,265.81 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 37669 Dickson's,Inc. 78.57 Electrical Supplies 37870 Dionex Corporation 7,101.16 Lab Supplies 37671 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 112.64 Stationary&Office Supplies 37672 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 58.16 Point Supplies 37673 DMG-Maximus 4,725.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan 37674 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 578.68 Electrical Supplies 37675 Eberhard Equipment 140.42 Tractor Repair 37676 Ecapla L.L.C. 2,887.40 Computer Supplies-Mobile Scanner B Cable 37677 ElecbaBond 23,370.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies-Belt,Loading&Driver Rollers 37678 Enchanter,Inc. 8,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 37679 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 17.500.00 Industnal Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 37680 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,000-00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 37681 Family Defame Products 418.95 Safety&Office Supplies 37682 FedEx Corporation 144.64 Air Freight 37683 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 12,798.43 Lab Supplies-HB Project,Phase III 37634 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 168.00 Concrete Cutting 37685 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 20.453.50 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 37686 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 740.46 Truck Wash Tickets 37687 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 387.01) Paint Supplies 37683 Franklin Covey 81.92 Office Supplies 37689 Frost Engineering 181.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 3769D City of Fullerton 282-99 Water Use 37691 FST Sand and Gavel,Inc. 768.74 Road Base Materials 37692 Ganahl Lumber Company 283.06 Lumber/Hardware 37693 General Petroleum 10,917.61 Unleaded Gasoline Page 2 of 12 Claims Paid From 08/01101 to 08115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37694 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 787.74 Bell Filter Press Supplies 37695 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,06&08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37696 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 133A3 Janitorial Supplies 37697 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 1,DD2.14 Engine Generator Control Supplies 37698 Heat Technology Products 3,020.63 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 37699 Hilti,Inc. 88.51 Electrical Pans&Supplies 37700 The Holman Group 701 As Employee Assistance Program Premium 37701 Home Depot 948.01 Small Hardware 37702 Hub Auto Supply 212.18 Truck Parts 37703 City of Huntington Beach 17,891.20 Water Use 37704 Voided Check - - 37705 HI Standard Automotive 960.79 Automotive Supplies&Installation 37706 Industrial Dishibution Group 1.152.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37707 Industrial Metal Supply 2,098.19 Metal 37708 Ionics Instrument Business Group 891.00 Lab Supplies&Service 37709 Irvine Photo Graphics 4.059.74 Photographic Services 37710 Irvine Ranch Water District 19.74 Water Use 3771l IBM Corp. 597.60 IBM AS/400 Lease 37712 INet Systems,Inc. 3,720.00 Software Maintenance 37713 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 1,311.50 Instrument Supplies 37714 John's Philly Grille 81.36 Meeting Expense PI-37 Workshop 37715 JCI Jones Chemical,Inc. 12,417.77 Sodium Hypochlonts 37716 Voided Check - - 37717 Kalmar Pro notions 1.427.87 Printing 37718 Kensington Electronics 2.097.42 Electrical Paris&Supplies 37719 La Mo0e Chemical Products 153.88 Lab Pads&Supplies 37720 Lexis-Nexis 53.89 Books&Publications 37721 Liberty Environmental 2,003.17 Lab Paris&Supplies 37722 Gerald R.Jones 4,473.01 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 37723 Mag Systems 634.95 Electronic Supplies 37724 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2,068.30 Mechanical Supplies 37725 Manad,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 37726 Manley's Boller Repair Company,Inc. 154.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37727 Martin Container 752.50 Rekigerated Container Rentals 37728 MarVac Electronics 61.87 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37729 The Mathworks,Inc. 2.000.00 ECM Training Registration 37730 MCBaln Instruments 110.00 Lab Supplies 37731 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 505.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37732 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 4,482.83 Mechanical Parts&Repairs 37733 Media Clips,Inc. 108.00 Notices 37734 Medlin Controls Co. 936.77 Instrument Supplies 37735 Meeting Planners Plus 5,500.00 Professional Services-Exhibit&Project Management for O.C.Fair 2001 37736 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6,693.75 Mechanical Park&Supplies 37737 Mission Uniform Service 4,272.66 Uniform Rentals 37738 Murphy Switch 149.47 Ins.Parts&Supplies 37739 Mark A.Murphy 106.24 Replacement Check Page 3 of 12 Claims Paid From 08/01/01 to 08115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37740 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 21,580.19 Professional Services J-85 37741 Mine Safety Appliances 102.97 Instrument Supplies 37742 National Plant Services,In. 640.00 Vacuum Truck Services 37743 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 990.D0 O&M Training Registration 37744 Neal Supply Co. 362.28 Plumbing Supplies 37745 City of Newport Beach 66.65 Water Use 37746 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 127.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 37747 The Norco Companies 162.14 Mall Delivery Service 37748 Office Depot Business Services Div. 949.96 Office Supplies 37749 Orange County Vector Control District 1,864.81 Pest Control 37750 Orange Courier 34,65 Courier Services 37751 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 919.75 Fillings 37752 Oxygen Service Company 889.18 Specialty Gases 37753 OCB Reprographics 15,010.26 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 37754 OCE-USA,Inc. 372.95 Computer Equipment Maim. 37755 P.L Hawn Company,Inc. 121.70 Electrical Supplies 37756 Pacific Bell 42.54 Telephone Services 37757 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2.599.84 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 37758 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 11,589.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37759 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 390.00 Mechanical Suppose 37760 Parker Supply Company 2,088.82 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 37761 Parts Unlimited 366.44 Truck Supplies 37762 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,324.61 Lab Parts&Supplies 37763 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 16,337.12 Residues Removal MO 3.29-95 37764 Polydyne,Inc. 17.690.24 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 37785 Ponton Industries,Inc. 2.594.00 Instrument Supplies 37766 Power Design 973.98 Electrical Supplies 37767 Projects Partners 4,555.20 Temporary Employment Services 37768 Pumping Solutions.Inc. 1,649.15 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 37769 PVF Sales,Inc. 73.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 3TT70 DOS,L.L.C. 268.82 Investment Management Progrom Service 37771 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 37772 Red Wing Shoes 125.56 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 37773 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 126.25 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37774 RSA Sutter Soll Products 1,596.38 Soil Materials 37775 S&J Supply Co., Inc. 298.70 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37776 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 20,828.28 Construction -Manhole Repair 37777 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 286.08 Specialty Gases 37778 City of Seal Beach 108.96 Water Use 37779 Sears Industrial Sales 197.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37780 Seaventures 11,100.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 37781 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 69.81 Stationery&Office Supplies,&Maintenance Materials 37782 Shepherd Machinery Co. 582.52 A/C Filters 37783 Shlmadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. 681.76 Lab Supplies 37784 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,288.82 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37785 Supelco,Inc. 646.27 Lab Supplies Page 4 of 12 Claims Paid From 08/01/01 to 08/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37786 James W.Silva 103.65 Replacement Check 37787 Skater,Inc. 3.197.08 Lab Supplies 37788 SoftChoice 1,677.00 Software Upgrade 37789 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 65.36 Pump Supplies 37790 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 113.11 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 37791 Summit Steel 26.82 Metal 37792 Sunset Ford 246.31 Vehicle Supplies 37793 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,381.30 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37794 SPEC Services,Inc. 2,909.73 Engineering Services J-33.1 37795 Tasew,Inc. 1,190.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37796 Tetra Tech,Inc. 16,669.01 Professional Services 11-22 37797 Textile Engineering Associates 974.41 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37798 The Foxboro Company 299.27 Instrument Supplies 37799 Osprey Marine Management 9,120.00 Professional Services J-85 37800 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 13.084.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37801 ThyssenWupp Elevator 1.200.00 Elevator Maintenance 37802 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 37803 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 24.99 Locks&Keys 37804 Towers Perrin 6,500.00 Professional Services-ARBA Actuarial Study 37805 Tmn Consulting Engineers 20,692.00 Engineering Services 1-2-4,1-17&7-21 37806 The Trans Company 936.24 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37807 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 240.00 O&M Training Registration 37800 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,929.99 Truck Supplies 37809 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 40.00 Lab Services 37810 Tuthill Energy Systems,c/o Mctrenna 3.130.09 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37811 United Parcel Service 553.94 Panel Services 37812 Unocal 76 210.06 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1 Inspection 37813 US Equipment Go.,Ina 5,862.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37814 Valley Cifres Supply Company 22.60 Plumbing Supplies 37815 Valley Cities Supply Company 44.72 Plumbing Supplies 37816 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 28.98 Mechanical Supplies 37817 Vapex,Inc. 11,525.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37818 Vedmn Calgomia 655.99 Telephone Services 37819 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 2,473.66 Lab Parts&Supplies 37820 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,214.00 Security Guards 37821 Waste Markets Corp. 20,743.63 Maintenance Agreement -Grit 8 Screenings Disposal 37822 Waxie Sanitary Supply 685.14 Janitorial Supplies 37823 Wastamerica Graphics 3.522.07 Printing 37824 Western States Chemical 1.644.56 Muratic Add 37825 Xerox Corporation 9,365.26 Copier Leases 37826 York International 281.76 Oil 37827 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 6.126.86 Construction J-80 37826 Olsson Construction, Inc. 6,436.00 Construction J-52 37829 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 130.00 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 37830 Bran Bingman 386.82 Meetingrminrg Expense Reimbursement 37831 Steven R.DeWilde 528.55 MeetingRmining Expense Reimbursement Page 5 of 12 Claims Paid From 08101/O1 to 08/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37832 Fred J.O'Brien 333.92 Mesting/Training Expense Reimbursement 37833 Eden J.Brady 525.00 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 37834 Norman Eckemode 525.00 MeetinglTraming Expense Reimbursement 37835 Peter M.Green 525.00 Meeling/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 37836 Orange County Sanitation District 675.28 Petry Cash Ralmb. 37837 Blue Cross of California 225.199.70 Medical Insurance Premium 37838 Orange County Sanitation District 480,383.82 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 37839 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 204.23 Legal Services Tran vs.Kovacs 37840 Airgas Safety 66.56 Safety Supplies 37841 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 7,047.00 Professional Services-OCSD vs.Kings County 37842 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 233.13 Publication 37843 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,560.81 Long Distance Telephone Service 37844 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 37845 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 37846 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 ConsuBrg Services-EMT Management Training 37847 CWEA Membership 224.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 37948 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 37849 Allied Supply Company 352.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37850 Wendy French 12.336.28 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 37851 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 37852 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 547.30 Communications Meeting Expense 37853 Edc Herds 575.68 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 37854 Hunts'Final Phase 1,450.00 Construction-Floor Tile Repair Electrical Offices 37855 Industrial Metal Supply 1,377.22 Metal 37856 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 26.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37857 Intelligence Press, Inc. 1,029.00 Publication 37858 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,373.78 Dues Deduction 37859 Jack Higgins 5,000.00 Professional Services-Business Coaching 37860 Joint Instrumentation Committee 30.00 0&M Meeting Registration 37861 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,096.00 FIS Support Services 37862 Luccrs 105.00 Meeting Expense 37863 MarVac Electronics 56.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37864 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 546.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37865 Motion Industries 578.85 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 37866 Orange County CcestKeeper 250.00 Professional Services J-85 37867 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 37868 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 238.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 37869 OCEA 467.37 Dues Deduction 37870 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 37871 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 37872 Peace Officers Council of CA 882.00 Dues Deduction 37873 Presskils 3,714.77 Stationery&Office Supplies 37874 Pryor Resources.Inc. 129.00 0&M Meeting Registration 37875 Court Order 721.50 Wage Gamishment 37876 So.Cal.Gas Company 15,439.42 Natural Gas 37877 Southern California Edison 9,720.76 Power Page 6 of 12 Claims Paid From 08/01101 to 08115101 Woman No. Vender Amount Description 37878 State Board Of Equalization 308.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 37879 Sterling An 21.81 Office Supplies 37880 SAWPA 9,000.00 Professional Services-SAWPA 37881 U.S Postal Service 5,ODO.00 Postage 37882 Union Dodge 23,380.88 (1)2001 Dodge Ram Truck 37883 The Unisource Corporation 6,806.02 Office Supplies 37884 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 37885 Marco Vargas 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 37886 Verizon Calffomla 1,041.08 Telephone Services 37887 Frank Chavez 630.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 37888 Norman Eckenrods 201.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 37889 Jean E.Tappan 330.53 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 37890 Andrew Dickman 150.00 Award-O.C.School of Arts H.S.-Clean Water Willie Coloring Book 37891 Voided Check - - 37892 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 825.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 37893 Employee Activity Committee 80.00 Service Award Expense 37894 American Express 31.221.44 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 37695 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 46.630.01 Professional Services J-73.2 37896 RPIIBlo Gro 67,496.36 Residuals Removal NO4-26-95 37897 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 48,391.13 (10)Computers&Hardware 37898 Della Dental 50,922.62 Dental Insurance Plan 37899 Dionex Corporation 47,300.00 Lab Equipment-Solvent Extractor 379M Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 63.397.84 Miss Const.-BIo. Rot.,Staking Proposed Roads,Rapt.36'Mainline Valve,Trat.Cld. 37901 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 32,564.12 Medical Insurance Premium 37902 Kemlron Pacific.Inc. 57,208.01 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 37903 Meeting Planners Plus 28,442.50 Professional Services J-85 37904 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 28,232.11 Lubdcan9Diesel Fuel 37905 Ondeo Degremont,Inc. 98,163.80 Construction P2.66.1 37906 Pacific Investment Management Co. 169,446.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 37907 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 263.377.63 Engineering Services J-35-2 370D8 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 40,707.42 Sodium Hypochlodte 37909 Projects Partners 43,871.43 Temporary Employment Services 37910 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. _ 122,902.50 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 37911 Southern California Edison 44,462.97 Power 37912 Tule RanciVMagan Fame 139.672.27 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 37913 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 40,618.26 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 37914 Souther Contracting Company 78,095.00 Construction J-33-1 &J-63 37915 Abalix Environmental Corp. 220.38 Hardware 37916 Great American Printing Co. 2,133.04 Paper 37917 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 5,365.00 Study Agreement Air Emissions 37918 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 218.13 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 37919 Alr Cold Supply 11.14 Air Conditioner Supplies 37920 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Parts&Supplies 37921 Alrbome Express 85.81 Air Freight 37922 American Computer&Communications,Inc. 159.00 Computer Equipment Melnt. 37923 American Water Works Assoc./Water Oualty, 117.00 Membership Page 7 of 12 Claims Paid From 08101101 to 08115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 37924 Anthony Past Control.Inc. 400.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 37925 Applecas Employment Service 3,567.49 Temporary Employment Services 37926 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 500.00 Todcity Testing 37927 Arous Data Security 469.00 Dilate Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 37928 Asbury Envimnmental Services 115.00 Waste Oil Removal 37929 Ashmore Construction Co. 24,905.98 Construction-Sewer Pipe Repair-17Ih St.,Tustin 37930 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 189.59 Telephone Service 37931 AWSI 256.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 37932 Battery Specialties 571.47 Flashlights 37933 BloMeneux Ynek,Inc. 568.81 Lab Supplies 37934 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc. 54.03 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 37935 California Municipal Statistics,Inc. 450.00 CAFR Report FV 2000-01 -Debt Statement 37936 Caltrol,Inc. 512.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 37937 Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. 2.083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 37938 Cameron Welding Supply 82.15 Tools 37939 Camp Dresser 8 McKee,Inc. 2,050.00 Engineering Services-Sewer Mapping Maintenance 37940 C.R.Nelson P.E. 2.600.00 Engineering Consultant 241 37941 Cad Warren 8 Co. 681.96 Insurance Claims Administrator 37942 Carleton Engineers 8 Consultants,Inc. 2,464.10 Engineering Services-Air Quality 37943 Carollo Engineers 19,682.47 Engineering Services P1-60,P2-60 37944 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 6,601.05 Engineering Services-Biofeed Water System Upgrade 37945 Chromate Industrial Corp 330.49 Tools 37946 Clickgcard Corporation 161.25 Printer Service Agreement 37947 Compressor Components of Califomia 1,817.83 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 37948 Computers America,Inc. 360.34 Computer Supplies 37949 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 1,625.52 Electrical Paris 8 Supplies 37950 Consolidated Plastics Company 270.42 Lab Supplies 37951 Converse Consultants 290.00 Consulting Service-Environmental,Geotechnical 3 Materials Testing 37952 Cooper Energy Services 5.220.36 Mechanical Pars 8 Supplies 379M Corporate Ewess Imaging 1,810.30 Tape Cartridge for FIS Backup 379M Corporate Express 244.50 Office Supplies 37955 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 37956 Cost Containment Solutions 909.6E Workers Comp.Services 37957 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 381.86 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 37958 County of Orange(PFRD Geomalks) 376.20 (4)Parcel Maps 37959 County Wholesale Electric Co. 464.94 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 37960 Crystal Decisions 11,659.01 Software Maintenance 37961 Cummins Cal Pacific,Inc. 594.11 Heater,Tank 37962 CRC Press,Inc. 197.37 Publication 37963 David's Tree Service 2.100.00 Tree Maint.Service 37964 Dawson Company 1,948.32 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 37965 Del Mar Analytical 1,172.00 Biosolids Analysis 37966 DeZudk Uo MISCO/SOnthWest 1.248.08 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 37967 Diamond H Recognition 607.61 Employee Service Awards 37968 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1,51&66 Paint Supplies 37969 DDB Engineering,Inc. 3.720.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 8 of 12 Claim Paid From 08101/01 to O8/15101 Wimant No. Vendor Amount Description 37970 E Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 597.60 Electrical Supplies 37971 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 2155.00 Medical Screening 37972 Electra-Bond 1,988.76 Mechanical Repairs 37973 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 2,400.00 Safety Training&Consulting Services 37974 Enchanter,Inc. 3,2D0.00 Organ Monitoring MO 5-24-95 37975 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 17,500.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 37976 Equipment Life Technology 288.75 Mechanical Supplies&Oil 37977 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. 294.23 Maintenance Service-Track Scales 37978 FedEx Corporation 1.908.46 Air Freight 37979 Filarsky&Waft L.L.P. 997.50 Professional Services-SPMT Labor Negotiator 37980 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,255.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 37981 Flo-Systems,Inc. 102.23 Freight Charges 37982 Forestry Suppliers 104.54 Lab Supplies 37983 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 20,508.34 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 37984 Fountain Valley Camara 91.23 Photo Supplies 37985 Franklin Covey 794.13 Office Supplies 37986 Frye Electronics 786.42 Computer Supplies 37987 Garrati-Callahan Company 3,372.28 Pump&Pump Supplies 37988 General Petroleum 9,778.87 Unleaded Gasoline 37989 Goldenwast Fence Company 283.00 Fence Installation at Pit.1 37990 Goldemyest Window Service 640.00 Maintenance Service-Steam Head"rks B at Pit.2 37991 Goodmy Technologies Corp 160.00 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 37992 W W Grainger, Inc. 4,656.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 37993 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 50.70 Janitorial Supplies 37994 Hacker Equipment Company 548.52 Autoffmck Pans&Supplies 37995 Hach Company 15,472.96 tab Parts&Supplies 37996 Harold Primrose Ice 164.50 Ice For Samples 37987 Harvard Swlnmr;Review 118.00 Subscription 37998 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 176.57 Engine Generator Control Supplies 37999 Herb's Blackforwt Bakery&Dell 123.75 Meeting Expenses 3000D High Impact Training 400.00 Safely Training 38001 Home Depot 840.42 Small Hardware 38002 Hub Auto Supply 123.69 Truck Parts 38003 Hydrates 4.468.30 Luba Oil 380D4 Industrial Distribution Group 2,341.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38005 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 54.25 Lab Paris&Supplies 38006 Inside CAUEPA 585.00 Publication 38007 Irvine Ranch Water Disldct 29.00 Water Use 38008 IBM Corp. 8,042.21 IBM AS/400 Lease 38009 IMRI 8,580.00 Temporary Employment Services 38010 J&B Auto Paris 18.81 Auto Pam&Supplies 38011 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 6,286.76 Instrument Parts&Supplies 38012 J.L.Wingert Co. 1,381.85 Plumbing Paris&Suppliee 38013 Jays Catering 2,285.75 Meeting Expenses 38014 Thermo Wastronics 1,472.94 Instrument Supplies 38015 JLM Contracting 4,571.05 Construction Service-Pipe Repair Page 9 of 12 Claims Paid From 08/01/01 to 08/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38016 K P Concepts 429.73 Rideshare mcemNe Program 38017 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 8.745.00 FIS Support Services 38018 Kelly Paper 56.63 Paper 38019 KMI Industries,Inc. 181.80 Piping Supplies 38020 Lab Support 20.237.55 Temporary Employment Services 38021 Themes LsbSystems 8,050,00 Lab Equipment Malnt.Service 38022 La Mo0e Chemical Products 280AI Chemicals 38023 Gerald R.Jones 4,545.14 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 38024 Line-X Protective Coatings 3,544.40 Truck Liners for(8)Trucks 38025 Long Beach Uniform Co.,Inc. 1,853.28 Electrical Supplies 38026 Mantic Motors 55.00 Towing Services 38027 Margate Construction,Inc. 546.13 Construction-Soil Excavation 8 Repacking 38028 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.632.07 Mechanical Parts,Supplies 3 Repairs 38029 MCRay Industries,Inc. 906.96 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 38030 Mac Analytical System 5,096.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 38031 Medlin Consols Co. 288.11 Instrument Supplies 38032 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 16,006.75 Mechanical Parts 3 Supplies 38033 Mission Uniform Service 4.800.45 Uniform Rentals 38034 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,562.00 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 38035 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 38036 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 38037 Neal Supply Co. 99.44 Plumbing Supplies 38038 Nodab 189.60 Chemicals 38039 Office Depot Business Services Di, 618.12 Office Supplies 38040 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 138.99 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 38041 Orange County CoastKeeper 2.500.00 Sponsor-Annual Coastal Protection Recognition Dinner 38042 Orange County Vector Control District 879.28 Past Control 3SO43 Oxygen Service Company 2,911.03 Specialty Gases 38044 OCB Reprographics 3,347,70 Printing Service-MO 1126100 38045 Pacific Bell 14.74 Telephone Services 38046 Paclnc Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 38047 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4,368.15 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies 38048 Pacific Parts 8 Controls 68720 Electrical Supplies 38049 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 1.787.47 Mudatic Acid 38050 Parker Hannifin Corporation 59.63 Plumbing Pads&Supplies 3B051 Pads Unlimited 43.85 Truck Supplies 38052 Patriot Video Productions 50.08 Video 38M Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 720.25 Janitorial Supplies 38054 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 5,759.08 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 38055 Potydyne,Inc. 18,011.77 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 38056 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 2,393.16 Mechanical Maint 38057 Pre-Pald Legal Services,Inc. 538.20 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 3805E Primary Source 16,425.03 Office Furniture 38059 Putzmeister 75.68 Fittings 38060 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 38061 PSI 577.48 Pump Page 10 of 12 Claims Paid From 08101101 to 08/15I01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38062 Reliastar 8.300.05 Employee Medical Health Premium 38063 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins, 7,702.34 Life Insurance Premium 38064 Rick Kattelman 130.00 ECM Training Registration 38065 Rockwell Engineering 8 Equipment Co. 1,840.00 Pump Repairs 38066 RBF Engineers 23,333.00 Engineering Services 241 38067 RPM Electric Motors 649.43 Electrical Parts,Supplies 3 Repairs 38068 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 105.98 Paint Supplies 38069 Sears Indusrial Sales 3.490.17 Tools 38070 Seaventures 11.100.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 38071 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 82.30 Paint Supplies 38072 Shepherd Machinery Co. 284.06 Truck Supplies 38073 Shureluck Sales a Engineering 473.19 Mechanical Parts 3 Supplies 38074 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 198.29 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 38075 So.Cal.Gas Company 11,571.86 Natural Gas 38076 SoftChoice 1.230.88 Software 38077 Southern California Edison 3,208.47 Power 38078 Spox Certiprep,Inc. 73.31 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 38079 Sunset Ford 33.79 Vehicle Supplies 38080 Sunset Industrial Parts 2.161.34 Mechanical Supplies 38081 Super Chem Corporation 66925 Chemicals 38082 Sy Nielson Service,Inc. 225.00 Lab Services 38083 SCP Science 13.00 Freight Charges 38084 Severn Trend Laboratories,Inc. 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 38085 The Lewis Group 8,336.25 Consulting Service-Project Management Process 38086 The Meniwood Corporation 4,574.00 Professional Services-Blosokds Land Inspection 38087 The Orange County Register 1.177.92 Notices 8 Ads 38088 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. 3.986.11 Mechanical Supplies 38089 Deily Pilot 168.75 Notices 3 Ads 38090 Tonys Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 230.00 Locks&Keys 38091 Top Hat Producllons 416.56 Catering Services 38092 Trench Plate Rental 1,195.25 Rental Equipment 38093 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 405.00 Source Control Training Registration 38094 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9,382.77 Contract Groundskeeping MO 511-94 38095 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 1.533.29 Truck 3 Auto Supplies 38096 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 190.00 Lab Services 38097 Teksystems 6.744.00 Temporary Employment Services 38098 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 38099 United Parcel Service 57.37 Parcel Services 38100 Universal SPsciafties,Inc. 77.73 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies 38101 Unocal 76 223.59 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 Inspection 38102 Valley Cities Supply Company 500.84 Plumbing Supplies 38103 Van Air Systems, Inc. 1,153.13 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 38104 The Vantage Group,LL.C. 9,815.00 Temporary Employment Service 38105 Verizon California 3,616.13 Telephone Services 38106 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,261.92 Vision Service Premium 38107 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 5,225.38 Lab Parts 3 Supplies Page 11 of 12 Claims Paid Fran 08/01/01 to 08115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38108 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,313.00 Security Guards 38109 Washington State University Conferences 295.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 38110 Weather 3 Wind Instrument Co. 511.78 Wind Sock Fname 38111 Xerox Corporation 1.601.61 Copier Leases 38112 Mark Castillo 185.47 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 38113 David A.Lu&An 185.54 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 38114 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 9,630.00 Construction J-63 38115 Orange County Sanitation District 727.26 Party Cash Reimb. 38116 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist. 349.79 Fee-Employee Commute Reduction Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5.858,02203 Payroll Disbursements 23844-24026 Employee Paychecks $ 219,389.74 Biweekly Payroll OB/08Po1 24027-24031 Interim Paychecks 2,427A8 Director,Termination,Standby 8 Bonus Pay 63622-64075 Direct Deposit Statements 761.852.76 Biweekly Payroll 08/08/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 933.669.99 Wire Transfer Payments Lloyds TSB Bank plc $ 84,160.65 Commission on Series 1992 Certificates of Participation Standby Agreement Chase Manhattan Bank $ 79,084.46 Commission on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Standby Agreement Chase Manhattan Bank $ 23,905.33 July Swap Payment on Series 2000'A'Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas,National Assoc. $ 83,558.71 Societe Generale Swap Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas,National Assoc. S 350,000.00 Annual Principal 8 Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wlre Transfer Payments $ 620,107.15 Total Claims Paid 08/01/01 -08115/01 $ 7,461,799.16 Page 12 of 12 - Claims Paid From 08116101 to 08I31I01 Warrant No. Vendor Amours Description Accounts Pavabla-Warrants 38117 G S A Electronics $ 5,000.00 Equipment for Huntington Beach Phase III Onshore Investigation Project(Deposit) 38118 County of Orange 69,240.21 User Fee Administrative Fees-Assessors Office 38119 Orange County Sanitation District 457,450.25 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 38120 Southern California Edison 36.497.04 Power 36121 Airgas Safety 497.20 Safety Supplies 38122 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 38123 Sonc logisllx L.L.C. 2,000.00 Professional Services-Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 1992 COPs 38124 Edca Brodowski 159.36 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38125 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 38128 Consolidated Elect.Ditudbulors,Inc. 59.34 Electrical Supplies 38127 CALPERLA 79D.00 Human Resources Training Registration 38128 CMfA 550.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 38129 CWFA 159.59 Publication-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 38130 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calff,Water Environment Assoc. 38131 Department of Motor Vehicles 24.00 I.D.Stickers for Ultra Low Emissions Vehicles CNG Ford Rangers 38132 Environmental Resource Assoclatlon/ERA 1,099.95 Lab Parts S Supplies 38133 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 38134 Wendy French 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38135 Fdend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 38136 Government Finance Officers Association 450.00 Application Fee-2001-02 Budget Presentation Award 38137 Scott Hudson 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38138 Information Resources 625.00 Human Resources Service 38139 Inteq Group 3,885.00 Information Technclogy Tmining Registration 38140 Ind.Union of Dow.Erp.AFL-CIO Local 501 1.402.38 Dues Deduction 38141 J.D.Edwards Work)Solutions Company 1,000.00 Information Technology Training Registration 38142 W tiitsm Jasso 908.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38143 K P Concepts 2,274.23 Printing 38144 Lebwere,Inc. 1.500.00 Lab Training Registration 38145 Alton Marm 1,059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38146 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 365.75 Mechanical Pane 8 Supplies 38147 Midwest Research Institute 3,000.00 Lab Analysis Services 38148 Juan Munoz 081.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38149 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Compliance Training Registration 38150 North Central Labs 30.00 Publication 38151 NAFA,Inc. 780.00 Membership 38152 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,646.40 Lab Services 38153 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 38154 The Orange County Register 338.52 Subscription 38155 Orange County Water District 168.30 Meeting Expense-Three-Agency Sponsored Legislative Breakfast 38156 Orange County Wellness Coalition 40.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 38157 OCEA 467.37 Dues Deduction 38158 Pacific Bell 15.41 Telephone Services 38159 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 38160 Calvin Pon 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 30151 Court Order 288.00 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 08/16/01 to 08/31101 Warrant No. Vendor Amoum Description 38162 Peace Officers Council of CA 8a2.00 Dues Deduction 38163 K.Plaza 2.051.75 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38164 Quantum Compliance Systems.Inc. 4,117.40 Software Maintenance Agreement 38165 Restek Corp. 179.10 Lab Training Registration 38166 Rulan B Tucker L.L.P. 8,855.82 Legal Services-Crow-Winthmp Development 38167 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 157.18 Paint Supplies 38168 Schwing America,Inc. 11,069.71 Pump Parts,Supplies&Repairs 38169 Court Order 72C50 Wage Garnishment 38170 Rebecca Sproal 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38171 Voided Check - - 38172 William Stephenson 981.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38173 Strategies for Business&Gov't,Inc. 158.00 Compliance Training Registration 38174 SCWMF 200.00 Sponsor-2001 Southern California Waste Management Conference 38175 M.Tobin 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38176 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 520.00 O&M Training Registration 38177 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 38178 Verizon California 53.59 Telephone Services 38179 Lucas Wall,Jr. 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38180 Warne Family Trost 4.479.24 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38181 Watson Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 381a2 Layne T.Baroldi 236.73 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 38183 William D.Cassidy 301.09 Meelirg7framing Expense Reimbursement 38184 James E.Colston 24.88 Meeting mining Expense Reimbursement 38185 Simon L.Watson 588.26 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 38186 FlIeNET Corporation 950.00 Engineering Training Registration 38187 Orange County Sanitation District 24.459.79 Workers Comp.Reimb. 38188 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 38189 State Board of Equalization 1,2W.00 Annexation Fee 38190 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 38191 Black&Veatch Corporation 215.025.94 Engineering Services J-77&Pl-76 38192 Cooper Energy Services 39,819.66 Engine Maintenance Contract 38193 Cylec Industries 29.455.15 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 38194 Mac Analylicsl System 53.374.53 Professional Services J-85 38195 MSC Applied Environmental Sciences 34,836.68 Professional Services JS5 38196 Plma Gro Systems,Inc. 59,305.33 Residuals Removal MO329-95 38197 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 79,752.97 Hypochlodle Solutions&Sodium Hydroxide 38198 Polydyne,Inc. 47,000.32 Cationic Polymer NO 3-11-92 38199 Science Applications Ing.,Corp. 44,565.24 Ocean Monitoring MO 641-94 38200 Tule RanctdMagan Farms 128,971.66 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 38201 Valverde Construction,Inc. 43,065.46 Sewer Repairs at Catherine SL,Anaheim 38202 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 48,009.57 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 38203 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 55,143.97 Legal Services MO 7-2695 38204 The Yakima Company 48,571.22 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 38205 Adems/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 35,551.88 Construction J-80 38206 J W Contracting Corporation 226.237.00 Construction P2.60 38207 Margate Construction,Inc. 434,164.00 Construction P2.39,J-71.1 &J-71-2 Page 2 of 7 � Claims Paid From 08/16101 to 08/31101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38208 Southern Contracting Company 106,258.00 Construction J-33-1 38209 Union Bank of California 25,027.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 38210 ATint of Glass 922,99 Window Tinting 38211 A-Plus Systems 3,518.68 Notices&Ads 38212 Accurate Awnings 2,365.00 Install Fined Awning at I.T.Trailers 311213 Acculile Fasteners,Inc. 115.02 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 38214 AccuStardard,Inc. 215.55 Lab Parts&Supplies 38215 Great American Printing Co. 124.70 Printing 38216 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,276.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38217 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,364.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 38218 Advanced Systems Group 10,074.90 Computers-(3)Servers 38219 Aearo Company 1,835.00 Safety Supplies 38220 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1,136.28 Lab Parts&Supplies 38221 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 Lab Supplies 38222 Airborne Express 110.46 Air Freight 38223 Airgas Safety 1.086.16 Safely Supplies 38224 Amercan teak Detection 3.450.00 Sewerline Testing-J-85 W225 Anaheim Truck&Auto Service, Inc. 4.587.83 Truck Repairs&Maintenance 38226 Analysts,Inc. 1,356.96 Testing Kits 38227 Anthony Past CortmA,Inc. 745.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 38228 Applied Industrial Technology 122.94 Custodial Supplies 38229 Applied Ocean Sciences 14,382.38 Professional Services-H.B.Shoreline Investigation Phase III 38230 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 500.00 Todcily Testing 311231 Arthur Andersen,LL.P. 1.314.00 Professional Services-OCSD vs.Kings County 38232 Artistic Blinds 210.01 MIN Blinds Repairs&Installation 38233 Asbury Environmental Services 105.00 Waste Oil Removal 38234 Aurora Pictures,Inc. 587.40 Safety Videos 38235 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 404.17 Telephone Service 38236 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 56.90 Telephone Service 35237 Battery Specialties 26.88 Bananas 36238 C.T.Balhala,PhD.,P.E. 375.00 Professional Services 2A1 38239 California Industrial Supplies 1,249.09 Auto Parts&Supplies 38240 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 38241 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 23.383.03 Engineering Services P2-82 38242 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,279.23 Copier Lease 38243 Compressor Components Of California 1,576A9 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38244 Computerized Facility Integration 13,970.11 Software Maintenance-EDMS Pilot 38245 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 4.801.37 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38245 Cooper Energy Services 4,581.97 Engine Supplies 38247 Corporate Express 1.097.34 Office Supplies 38248 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1.100.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38249 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 409.45 Maintenance Agreement-Repairsi nstallalion of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 38250 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 740.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 38251 CWEA-TCP 68.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 38252 Dawson Company 71.59 Plumbing Pans&Supplies 38253 Del Mar Analytical 90.00 Blosolids Analysis Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 08/16/01 to 08/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38254 DeZunk c/o Misco/SouthWest 1,248.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38255 DeZunk 74.24 Freight 38256 Dionez Corporation 111.23 Lab Pans&Supplies 38257 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 1.111.87 Electrical Pans&Supplies 38258 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 1,284.17 Medical Screening 38259 Enchanter,Inc. 8.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 38260 Enviromega, Inc. 4,000.00 Computer Software 38261 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,022.61 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 38262 FedEx Corporation 100.77 Air Freight 38263 Filter Supply Company 30.90 Filters 38264 First American Real Estate Solutions 292.00 Orange County Property Information 38265 Fisher Scientific Company.L.L.C. 2.378.54 Lab Pans&Supplies-H.B. Pmjed Phase III 38266 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 809.00 Concrete Cutting 38267 Flo-Systems.Inc. 2,414.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38268 Foote-Jones/Illi ols Gear 3,674.15 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 38269 Forestry Suppliers 1,068.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 38270 Fountain Valley Camara 31.72 Photo Supplies 38271 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 549.88 Tuck Wash Tickets 38272 Franklin Covey 102.77 Office Supplies 38273 Fys Electronics 24.61 Computer Supplies 38274 Ganahl Lumber Company 195.97 Lumber/Hardware 38275 Garland Manufacturing Co. 796.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38276 Ganatt-Callahan Company 4,158.49 Chemicals 38277 General Petroleum 10,395.88 Unleaded Gasoline 38278 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 4.658.00 Belt Filter Press Supplies 38279 Godwin Pumps of America.Inc. 1.464.03 Fittings 38280 Gold Systems,Inc. 4.031.25 Professional Services-User Interface Data Migration Tool&Data Monitoring 38281 Goodway Technologies Corp. 55.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38282 W W Grainger,Inc. 1.728.11 Electrical Pans&Supplies 38283 Edwards Systems Technology 2,279.50 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 38284 Hach Company 18,291.45 Electrical Supplies&Lab Parts&Supplies 38285 Hampton Tedder Technical Services 2,985.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service 38286 Harrington Ind.Plastics 1,992.29 Emergency Supplies J-71-7 38287 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 49.00 Meeting Erpenses 38288 Home Depot 2,025.48 Small Hardware 38289 City or Huntington Beach 19.423.49 Water Use 38290 Industrial Distribution Group 168.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38291 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 719.94 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 38292 Infinity Technology USA 69.07 Computer Supplies 38293 Inneriine Engineering 1,420.00 CCTV Video Inspection of Trunklines 38294 Irvine Ranch Water District 24.56 Water Use 38295 IBM Corp. 597.60 IBM AS/400 Lease 30296 IMRI 962.50 Temporary Employment Services 38297 J&L Industrial Supply 46.74 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 38298 J R Filanc Construction 4,750.00 Construction-Digester 96 Piping Support Rehabilitation&Upgrade 38299 John's Phllly Grille 228.82 Guidance Review Committee Meeting Expenses Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 08116101 to 08/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38300 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 3,915.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 38301 Kahl Scientific Instruments 605.00 Lab Supplies 38302 Karen Monaco&Associates 6.823.75 FIS Support Services 38303 Ken Thompson,Inc. 30.00 Debris Removal 38304 Lab Support 5.311.51 Temporary Employment Services 38305 Labeltroniz 4,840.00 Service Agreement-Printers 38306 Law Offices of Kinds, Rodiger&Spriggs 3.583.90 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 38307 La Molts Chemical Products 115.46 Chemicals 38308 Gerald R.Jones 4.698.67 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 38309 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2,229.09 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 38310 Marine Technology Network Association 380.00 Compliance Training Registration 38311 Martin Container 752.50 Refrigerated Container Rentals 38312 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 499.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38313 Mission Uniform Service 3.295.67 Uniform Rentals 38314 Mitchell Instrument Co. 611.00 Electrical Paris It Supplies 38315 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 38316 MOMPhoto 137.88 Photographic Services 30317 MGD Technologies, Inc. 41,300.O11 Temporary Flow Monitoring 2-50 38318 National Fire Protection 115.0D Membership 38319 National Plant Services,Inc. 2JM.00 Vacuum Truck Services 38320 National Safety Council 506.00 Membership 38321 Naval Post Graduate School 9,574.25 Professional Services J-85 38322 Neal Supply Co. 1,723.13 Plumbing Supplies 38323 NelVersant of Silicone Valley 1,338.02 Security System Maintenance 38324 City of Newport Beach 70.80 Water Use 38325 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 362.96 Lubricant 38326 The Norco Companies 157.14 Mail Delivery Service 38327 Northern Tool If Equipment Company,Inc. 56.74 Mechanical Tools 38328 Cousin Test Equipment,Inc. 1,000.20 lab Parts If Supplies 38329 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.173.27 Office Supplies - 38330 On Safety 55.24 Safety Supplies 38331 Oxygen Service Company 1.587.93 Specially Gases 38332 OCB Reprographics 12,696.51 Printing Service-MO 1126I00 38333 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc, 673.43 Filters 38334 Pacific Bell 2.164.69 Telephone Services 38335 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.592.72 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 38336 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1.446.33 Lab Pans&Supplies 38337 Power Machine Co. 450.87 Electrical Supplies 38338 Primary Source 345.08 Office Fumiture 38339 Primavera Systems, Inc. 7,675.50 Software Mainl. 38340 Prodala 240.0D Software Maint. 38341 Public Storage 628.83 Reconciliation User Fee Program 38342 Putuneisler 6,726.26 Pump Parts&Supplies 38343 PCS Express 110.00 Corder Service 38344 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 38345 R.T.Engineering 458.31 Electrical Pans&Supplies Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 08/16/01 to 08/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38346 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,313.68 Trash Removal 38347 Randolph Austin Co. 645.30 Plumbing Supplies 38348 Raney Industries 645.00 Contract Service-Bell Press Equipment Modification 38349 Red Wing Shoes 148.78 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 38350 Rosemount/Unilac 1.901.10 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38351 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 1,155.00 Engineering Services-Addition to Fleet Services&Rebuild Shop 38352 RPM Electric Motors 1,178.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38353 Sanc n Engineering,Inc. 1,957.50 Constmcfion 14-1-1A 38354 Schwing America,Inc. 109.24 Fittings 38355 Seaventures 1.750.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 38356 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4.514.46 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 38357 Supeloo,Inc. 151.67 Lab Supplies 38358 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 21.63 Plumbing Supplies 38359 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 13,674.19 Permit Fees 38360 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 21,059.30 Pertnit Fees 38301 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 233.06 Permit Fees 38362 Southern California Edison 32.99 Power 38363 Sparkletts 3.828.62 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 38364 Spax Certiprep, Inc. 355.42 Lab Supplies 38365 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 244.90 Janitorial Supplies 38366 Sunset Industrial Parts 3.280.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38367 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 38368 SCP Science 117.00 Lab Supplies 38369 SPAN International Training 330.00 Training Supplies 38370 Sevem Trent Laboratories,Inc. 920.00 Lab Analytical Service 38371 Tetra Tech,Inc. 778.09 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 38372 Textile Engineering Associates 2,051.45 Mechanical Pads&Equipment 38373 Thermo Quest Corporation 21.716.72 Lab Parts,Supplies&Maintenance Contract 38374 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 259.00 Leak Test Analysis&Reports 38375 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 292.24 Mechanical Supplies 38376 Thompson Publishing Group 279.00 Publication 38377 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 38378 The Trans Company 3.065.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 38379 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 4,171.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 38380 Troy Systems,Inc. 863.48 Computer Supplies 38381 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 32.25 Truck/Auto Supplies 38382 Ultra Scientific 258.32 Lab Parts&Supplies 38383 The Unisoume Corporation 767.55 Office Supplies 38384 United Parcel Service 358.26 Parcel Services 38386 US Equipment Co., Inc. 51.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38386 Valley Cities Supply Company 23.38 Plumbing Supplies 38387 Verizon California 1,159.17 Telephone Services 38388 Veme's Plumbing 5,160.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 38389 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 2,145.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 38390 The Wackenhut Corporation 1,066.50 Security Guards 38391 West Virginia University Research Corp. 2.16 Freight Charges Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 08116/01 to 08131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38392 Weslem States Chemical 1.248.60 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 38393 WEFTEC 2D01 c/o Expoexcharge 1,590.00 O&M Meeting Registration 38394 WS Atkins Water 5,000.00 Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Development Project 38395 Xerox Corporation 10.918.23 Copier Leases 38396 Ark Construction Company 1,648.00 Construction-Enclose Open Bay at Plant l Warehouse 38397 Ken Thompson,Inc. 955.08 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 38398 Olsson Construction,Inc. 17,553.00 Construction J-52&Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation 38399 Union Bank of California 50.27 Construction 11-17.3&11.20,Retention 38400 Urbanism Engineering,Inc. 6,397.00 Construction J-66 38401 Ferrante,Kristen 109.18 Shelters for Beach Crew&Food Supplies for Survey Workers-J-85 38402 James L.Burror 948.06 Employee Computer Loan Program 38403 Bradley H.Cagle 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 38404 Robert L. Chenowith 1.446.13 Employee Computer Loan Program 38405 Paul A.Mitchell 2.805.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 38406 Orange County Sanitation District 1,435.79 Petty Cash Relmb. 38407 Robert Peters and Gateway 2.372.98 Employee Computer Loen Program 38408 Terry Matthews and Costoo 270.89 Employee Computer Loan Program 38409 Terry Matthews and NexCom 2,452.62 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,908,803.39 Payroll Disbursements 24032-24145 Employee Paychecks $ 172,135.67 Biweekly Payroll 08/22101 64076-64528 Direct Deposit Statements 761,959.47 Biweekly Payroll 08/22/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 934,095.14 Wire Transfer Payments Stale Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 501,374.77 August Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 501,374.77 Total Claims Pad 08/16/01 -08131/01 $ 4,344,273.30 Page 7 of 7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To 10/.24/gl of Dir. AGENDA REPORT Item Numoer Item Number e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 09//01/01 - 09/15/01 and 09/16/01 - 09/30/01 cAx dta�ld Ap FeW VW1e rd agenda RepulkIWINO 03IMPald eoc �^ ' armve Page 1 t Claims Paid From 09/01/01 to 09/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 38410 Blue Cross of California 3 226,378.00 Medical Insurance Premium 38411 BP Energy Company 188,776.52 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28 38412 Orange County Sanitation District 465,676.34 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 38413 Pam webller Incorporated 33,636.88 COP Remarketing Agreement 36414 Southern California Edison 92,362.84 Power 38415 The Yakima Company 28,322.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 38416 American Telephone 3 Telegraph Corp. 2.713.12 Long Distance Telephone Service 38417 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 33.08 Telephone Service 38418 AT B T Wireless Services-Airtime 4.353.53 Cellular Telephone Service 38419 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 38420 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 36421 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 38422 CAPIO:Calif Assoc of Public Info.OBcls. 175.00 Membership 38423 CR&R,Inc. 2,569.20 Container Rentals 35424 Environmental Resource Association 982.50 Lab Supplies 36425 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 38426 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 35427 Frost Engineering 1,013.20 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 35428 Hach do Ponton Industries 4,383.12 Portable Pumps 38429 City of Huntington Beach 28.58 Water Use 38430 Industrial Metal Supply 260.08 Metal 38431 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1.402.38 Dues Deduction 38432 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 1,715.32 Instrument Supplies 38433 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 2,873.50 Hot Taps Installations at Edinger 8 Rocky Pt. 38434 Johnson 8 Associates,L.L.C. 24,875.00 Compensation 8 Classification Study 38435 Keith Boger 335.00 O 8 M Training Registration 38436 Mellon Trust 19,265.38 Investment Custodian Bank 38437 NelVersant of Southern California 6,090.35 Security System Maintenance 38438 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 1,211.23 Tools 8 Miscellaneous Supplies 38439 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 38440 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 107.55 Fieegs 38441 OCEA 448.87 Dues Deduction 38442 Pacific Bell 41.78 Telephone Services 38443 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 38444 Pans Urdlmiled 3,508.06 Automotive Supplies 38445 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 38446 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 38447 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 277.36 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 38448 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1.762.03 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38449 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 33.02 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 38450 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 38451 SoflView Computer Products 218.43 Stationery 8 Offloe Supplies 38452 Southern California Water 77.20 Water Use 38453 StudloVisia 850.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint. 36454 The Lewis Group 17.318.94 Consulting Service-Project Management Process Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/01/01 to 09/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38455 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,616.32 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 38456 Td-Stale Seminar On-the-River 200.00 O 8 M and Source Control Meelin9/Training Registration 38457 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 38458 Verftecl 400.00 Professional Services-Software Upgrade 38459 Verizon California 1.264.64 Telephone Services 38460 The Wackenhut Corporation 1,066.50 Security Guards 38461 Xerox Corporation 466.58 Copler Leases 38462 James P.Benue 971.98 Mceting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 38463 Frank Chavez 478.92 Meegng/Training Expense Reimbursement 38464 James E.Colston 211.25 Meeeng/haining Expense Reimbursement 38465 Norman Eckenrode 185.06 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38466 Peter M.Green 193.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38467 Wanda R.Hagerty 413.53 Meetingri mining Expanse Reimbursement 35468 Deirdre E.Hunter 108.94 Mceting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38469 Kathleen T.Millea W4.85 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38470 James D.Niswonger 282.92 MeetingRrainirg Expense Reimbursement 38471 Yu-Li Tsai 194.39 Meeting?minirg Expense Reimbursement 35472 Equisery 3,980.00 Service Agreement-Auto Shop Equipment 38473 Yolanda Herrera 2,618.56 Vehicle Damage Claim 38474 Ingenium Name Account 1.565.00 Publications 38475 University of Arizona 3,000.00 Membership-Cooperative Research Center for Water Quality 38476 California Dept.of Fish and Game 386.38 Permit Fees 38477 Air Products 8 Chemicals 25,039.17 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 38478 Black 8 Veatch Corporation 64.168.01 Engineering Services J-71-3 8 J-77 38479 Boyle Engineering Corporation 110.251.82 Engineering Services 1-2-4,2-31,2-50,8-13,7-27 38400 Brown 8 Caldwell 72.273.02 Engineering Services J-25.6 8 2-41 38481 Southern California Marine Institute 34.578.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 38482 Camp Dresser 8 McKee,Inc. 38,782.42 Engineering Services.140-3,7-41,11-22 38483 Carollo Engineers 30,668.16 Engineering Services-Blosollds Management 38484 Corolla Engineers 143,465.31 Professional Services P2-60,J-25.4,J-39 3 P2-66 38485 City of Garden Grove 46,789.50 Cooperative Projects Program J-73 38486 City of Santa Ana 25,000.00 Cooperative Projects Program J-73 38487 Coastline Equipment 112.117.13 (1)John Deere Wheel Loader 36488 E.I.Du Pont De Nemoum and Company 101,410.00 Painting Maine.Services MO 4-22-98 38489 Idexx 53.105.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies HB Phase III Project 38490 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33,032.97 Medical Insurance Premium 38491 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 190,398.92 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 38492 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 29,978.73 Engineering Services J-71-7 38493 Orange County Water District 615,338.64 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-98 8 J-36 GRW System 38404 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 37.339.57 Construction-Sewer Repair at Bitter Point Pump Station 38495 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 47,728.64 Sodium Hydroxide 8 Hypochlorlte Solution 38496 Polydyne,Inc. 26,625.49 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 38497 Projects Partners 25,236.90 Temporary Employment Servloes 38498 RDO Equipment Company 43,000.00 1998 John Deere Tractor 38499 Science Applications Ind.,Corp. 144.379.39 Professional Services J-85 8 Ocean Monitoring 38500 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 27.475.27 Permit Fees Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/01101 to 09/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 3&501 Then Consulting Engineers 04,015.00 Engineering Services 1.2-4 38502 Tula RanciuMagan Farms 145.955.51 Residuals Removal MO 3-M95 38503 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 67,350.19 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 38504 The Yakima Company 109.794.81 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 39505 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 91.88 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 38508 Great American Printing Co. 148.48 Printing 38507 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 330.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 38508 Alrbome Express 59.68 Air Freight 38509 Nrgas Safety 1,193.42 Safety Supplies 38510 American Aldines 7.557.50 Travel Services 38511 Appleon ,Employment Service 4.581.01 Temporary Employment Services 38512 Applied Industrial Technology 286.15 Electrical Pads&Supplies 38513 Association for Facilities Engineering 310.00 Membership 38514 ARK Technologies 4.420.00 Data Processing 38515 ARO Services 395.13 Reconciliation Lear Fee Program 38516 AVO International 1,420.00 O&M Training Registration 38517 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Program-Advanced Workplace Strategies 38518 Battery Specialties 845.21 Batteries 38519 Bauer Compressors 1.350.20 Safety Supplies&Equipment 385M Berendeen Fluid Power 309.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38521 BloMerleux VBek,Inc. 605.93 Lab Supplies 38522 Board for Prof. Engineers 100.00 Publications 38523 Borthwick,Guy,Bettenhamen 7.444.59 Professional Services P244 38524 Bush&Associates,Inc. 892.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 38525 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Workers'Compensation Claims 38526 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1.135.51 Lab Parts&Supplies 38527 Canton Sko-Medical 267,53 Lab Parts&Supplies 38528 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,N.A. 2.120.00 Trustee Bank Service-Serles"B"1990-92 Certificates of Participation 38529 Clean Water Report 387.00 Subscription 38530 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg, 172.00 Stationery&Office Supplies 38531 Computers America,Inc. 128.94 Computer Supplies 38532 Consolklated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,427.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38533 Corlatruction Engineering Services 2,260.00 Professional Services-Data Conversion,Installation&Support 38534 Converse Consultants 1,107.00 Consulting Services P2-60 38535 Cooper Energy Services 2,910.93 Engine Supplies 38M Corporate Express Imaging 1,025.55 Computer Supplies 38537 Corporate Express 1,539.67 Office Supplies 38538 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 14,897.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 385N Cortach Engineering 2,441.18 Pump Supplies 38540 CmDay/Bentley Systems,Inc. 3,300.00 Engineering Training Registration 38541 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 158.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38542 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.710.54 Electrical Pans&Supplies 38543 CASA 550.00 Compliance Meeting Registration-California Association of Sanitation Agencies 38544 CW EA 100.00 Notices&Ads 38545 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 38546 Dapper Tire Co. 571.00 Truck Tires Pape 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/01101 to 09/15101 Wamam No. Vendor Amount Description 38547 David's Tree Service 2,750.00 Tree Maint.Service 38548 Dal Mar Analytical 1.029.00 I iceolids Analysis 38549 Diamond H Recognition 296.12 Employee Service Awards 38550 Dickson's, Ina 86A2 Electrical Supplies 38551 Dionex Corporation 3,101A5 Lab Parts&Supplies 38552 Document Control Solutions.Inc. 7,797.15 Software,Maint.Agreement&Stationery&Office Supplies 38553 Dunn-Edwards Corpora0on 402.44 Paint Supplies 38554 Dynamic Graphics Ed Foundation 27.00 Publication 38555 DDB Engineering, Inc. 8,520.00 Temporary Employment Services 38556 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 293.69 Electrical Supplies 38557 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,440.00 Medical Screening 38558 Elac a-Bond 1.193.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38M Embarcadero Technologies,Inc. 3,010.00 Software Mainl.Agreement 38560 Enchanter,Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 38561 Environmental Resource Assoclalion 1,098.60 Lab Supplies 38562 Environmental Sampling Supply, Inc. 243.28 Lab Supplies 38563 Excal Visual Communications 354.75 Safety Video 38564 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 1,759.02 Maim.Service Agreement 38565 FedFx Corporation 240.47 Air Freight 38566 Ferguson Valve Actuation 582.79 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 38567 Edward Finkbelner 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38568 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 6,5112.26 Lab Parts&Supplies,HB Project Phase III 38569 Flo-Systems,Inc. 6,941.81 Pump Supplies 38570 Fluid Components Ing.c/o Ponton Ind. 591.68 Electrical Supplies 38571 Fountain Valley Camara 15.86 Photo Supplies 38572 Franklin Covey 67.09 Office Supplies 38573 Frys Electronics 2,098.06 Computer Supplies 38574 FM International, Inc. 1,142.59 Professional Services J.25-1 38575 General Electric Supply Company 2,057.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38576 Gartner Group,Inc. 24.340.00 Research Advisory Service 38577 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 1.079.39 Bell Filler Press Supplies 38578 Gilmour Group 1,281.80 Garden Hoses 38579 Golden Bell Products 8A15.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 38M Golden West Machine, Inc. 4,409.14 Rebuild Hoffman Grit Blower 38581 Government Institutes,Inc. 323.13 Publication 38582 W W Grainger, Inc. 5,445.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38583 Graybar 343.13 Elecbical Supplies 38584 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 87.72 Janitorial Supplies 38585 Westmark Sales,Inc.1GLI International 592.63 Instrument Supplies 38586 Hach Company 18,006,47 Lab Equipment-(3)Automatic Wastewater Samplers 38587 Harold Primrose Ice 92.50 Ice For Samples 38588 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 238.87 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38589 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 5,048.07 Engine Generator Control Supplies 38590 Heat Technology Products 7,123.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38591 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 155.70 Office Supplies 38592 The Holman Group 707.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 09101/01 to 09/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 38593 Home Depot 139.38 Small Hardware 38594 Hopkins Technical Products 1,545.83 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 38%5 Horizon Technology 153.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 38596 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,424.23 Priming Service 38597 Indigo Systems Corp. 3.013.07 Computer Software 38598 Industrial Disidbugon Group 9,448.39 Tools and Truck Supplies 38599 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 44.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38600 Irvine Photo Graphics 13.44 Photographic Services 38601 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 20,955.54 Professional Services-Surveying Manhole Access Routes&Biology Research 38602 Jay's Catering 87.38 Meeting Expenses 38603 Jim's Suspension Service 275.00 Automotive Parts&Repairs 38604 Johnstone Supply 79.57 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38605 Kelly Paper 29.35 Paper 38806 Kelly Pipe Co.,L.L.C. 6,793.88 Pipes 30607 Ken Thompson,Inc. 8,117.43 Construction-Repair Sinkhole @ Brpokhursl&Indianapolis H.B. 38608 Knott's Soak City U.S.A.-O.C. WAS Employee Deposit Transfer 38609 Lab Support 3,102.67 Temporary Employment Services 38610 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodger&Spriggs 1.216.10 Legal Services-Tren vs.Kovacs 38611 Gerald R.Jones 4.489-82 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 38612 Line-%Protective Coatings 175.00 Truck Bed Liner 38613 LA Chemical 255.07 Caustic Soda 38614 Maned.Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 38615 MarVac Electronics 545.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38616 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 910.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38617 Mec Analytical System 3,458.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 38618 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1,169.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38619 Media Clips,Inc. 178.00 Notices&Ads 38620 Medlin Controls Co. 564.28 Instrument Supplies 38621 Michael TUMpseed&Associates 6,671.62 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 38622 Midway Mfg It Machining Co. 9.041.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38623 Miller Equipment Co. 977.58 Auto Parts&Supplies 38624 Mission Uniform Service 4,519.05 Uniform Rentals 38625 Mitchell Instrument Co. 411.00 Instruments 38626 Mobile Storage Group - 2.627.30 Storage Bin Rentals 38627 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 5,589.20 Auto Repairs&Maintenance Service 38628 MSA cio Mag Systems 2,298.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38629 N.Glantz&Son 858.23 Mechanical Parts&Safety Supplies 38630 National Fire Protection Association 871.42 Publication 38531 National Plant Services,Inc. 7,340.00 Vacuum Truck Services 38632 Neal Supply Co. 1,522.63 Plumbing Supplies 38633 Newark Electronics 740.76 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38634 Nlckey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 9,006.78 Lula=10iesel Fuel 38535 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 4,473.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing NO 6.24-98 38636 NAFA,Inc. 575.00 Facilities Maintenance Training Registration 38637 NWRI National Water Research Institute 245.00 Administration Meeting Registration 38638 0.C.Windustrial Co. 1,626.58 Plumbing Parts&Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 09101/O1 to 09/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38M Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,163.87 Office Supplies 3BS40 Olsson Construction,Inc. 24,045.62 Installation of High Rate Chopper Pump on Digester R 38641 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 3,294.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30642 Orange County Hose Company 320.15 Hoses 38M Orange Courier 23.10 Courier Services 38544 Orange Valve&Filling Company 935.39 Plumbing Pans&Supplies 38645 Oxygen Service Company 18.81 Lab Supplies 38646 OCB Reprographics 2,170.61 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 38647 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 107.98 Electrical Supplies 38648 Pacific Mechanical Supply 6,499.87 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 38649 Pagenel 5,449.11 Paging Services 38650 Parker Supply Company 9,375.08 (3)Mechanical Seals for High Rate Mixer Pumps 38651 Parkhouse Tire Co. 310.89 Time 38662 Parts Unlimited 146.66 Truck Supplies 38653 Paul Pitt 600.00 Engineering Services-AS Plant Selector Tech Study 38654 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 9,157.32 Lab Parts&Supplies 38655 Pima Gro Systems.Inc. 5.010.18 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 38656 Power Lift Corporation 2WA2 Maintenance Services 38557 Primary Source 4.966.50 Office Furniture 38658 Propipa 22.388.86 Sewenine Cleaning at Irvine Business Complex 38659 R.W.Beck 455.70 Professional Services-Air Systems Upgrade 38660 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,0D0.00 Kem County Siosolids Consulting Services 38661 Raney Industries 800.00 Contract Service-Beg Press Equipment Modification 38662 RBF Engineers 15,936.00 Engineering Services 241 38663 RPM Electric Motors 1.632.56 Motor for Generator Trailer 386U RS Hughes Co,Inc. 783.79 Paint Supplies 38665 S&S Plating 1.992.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38666 Safetycare,Inc. 236.50 Safety Video 38667 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 4,500.00 Construction -Manhole Repair 38668 Schwing America,Inc. 5%.25 Pump Supplies 38669 Scotsman Ice Systems 125.15 Electrical Pans It Supplies 38670 Sears Industrial Sales 101.76 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38671 Seavemures 11.000.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 38672 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 133.15 Tools 38673 Shimadw Scientific Instruments, Inc. 1.944.95 Lab Pans&Supplies 38674 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,951.07 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 38675 Scalar,Inc. 704.96 Lab Parts&Supplies 38676 Snap On Industrial 161.06 Tools 38677 So.Cal. Gas Company 837.99 Natural Gas 38678 South Coast Environmental Co. 4,686.80 Engineering Services-Alt Toxics Emissions Source Testing 38M Southern California Edison 2.968.65 Power 3t1680 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. 68.16 Janitorial Supplies 38681 Sterling An 9.70 Office Supplies 38682 Steven Enterprises. Inc. 254.68 Office Supplies 38683 Suncer Stainless,Inc. 101.02 Instrument Parts&Supplies 38684 Sunset Ford 365.09 VehWe Supplies Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/O1101 to 09/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38685 Sunset Industrial Parts 6,128.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38686 SARBS 926.00 O&M Training Registration 38687 SARBS-CWEA 370.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 38688 SOP Science 133.00 Lab Supplies 38689 SPEC Services, Inc. 7,619.66 Engineering Services J-33-1 38690 Thermo Quest Corporation 2,107.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 38691 Osprey Marine Management 3,010.00 Professional Services J-85 38692 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2.102.75 Mechanical&Electrical Paris&Supplies 38693 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 38M Tony s Lock&Safe Service&Sales 87.79 Locks&Keys 38695 Toshiba International Corporation 493.43 Electrical Supplies 38696 The Trans Company 168.35 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38697 Transcal 1.182.15 Electrical Supplies 38698 Tropical Plana Nursery, Inc. 9,055.77 Contract Groundskeeping MO5-11-94 38699 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 447.64 Truck Supplies 38700 TCH Associates, Inc. 579.83 Lab Supplies 38701 Teksyslems 4,694.50 Temporary Employment Services 38702 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Lab Service Agreement-Water Purification System 38703 Ultra Scientific 2,271.65 Lab Supplies 38704 The Unisoume Corporation 130.00 Office Supplies 38705 United Parcel Service 29.05 Parcel Services 38708 United States Government Printing Office 47.00 Publication 38707 V L Systems,Inc 700.00 Software Consultant Services 39708 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,538.13 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 387D9 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,200.00 Temporary Employment Service 38710 Varian,Inc. 1,310.08 Lab Park&Supplies 38711 Verizon California 437.54 Telephone Services 38712 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,292.74 Lab Park&Supplies 38713 W.D.Prout Company 3,327.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38714 The Wackenhut Corporation 1,066.50 Security Guards 38715 Waste Markets Corp. 13,825.20 Maintenance Agreement-Grit&Screening Removal 38716 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 15,479.83 Engineering Service J-67 38717 Waxis Sanitary Supply 1,066.04 Janitorial Supplies 38718 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 572.98 Camera Parts 38719 WEF 1,232.DD Membership-Water Environment Federation 38720 Xerox Corporation 3.584.86 Copier Leases 38721 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 106.37 Office Supplies 38722 Zymark Corporation 7.516.62 Instrument Park&Supplies 38723 3CMA 350.00 Membership-City-County Communications&Marketing Association 38724 Sonia A.Wassgren 132.49 MeetinglTralnirg Expense Reimbursement 38725 Local Agency Formation Commission 4,75D.00 Annexation Fee 38725 Lydia Nunez and Dell 1.590.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 38727 Orange County Sanitation District 625.59 Petty Cash Relmb. 38728 Stale Board of Equalization 1,200.011 Annexation Fee Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,139,047.79 Page 7 of 8 Claim;Paid From 09/01/01 to 09115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursement 24146-24286 Employee Paychecks $ 190,057.98 Biweekly Payroll 09/05f01 24287-24322 Interim Paychecks 79.080.01 Nan-Base Building Bonuses 64529-64983 Direct Deposit Statements 757,362.20 Biweekly Payroll Total Payroll Disbursement $ 1,028,520.19 Who Transfer Payment Chase Bank of Texas $ 78.263.76 August Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 85,552.05 August Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Win,Transfer Payment $ 163.815.81 Total Claims Pafd 09/01/01 -09115101 $ 5,329,363.79 Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 09116101 to 09/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amoam Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 38729 Mc Weloo Products 6 48,375.00 (30)Custom Weather-Resistant Tool Boxes 38730 Orange County Sanitation District 512.714-18 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30731 So.Cal.Gas Company 31.607.57 Natural Gas 38732 Southern California Edison 25,279.87 Power 38733 Orange County Sanitation District 36,134.97 Workers Comp.Reimb. 38734 Alrgas Safety 1,069.28 Safety Supplies 38735 American Express 22,087.88 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 38736 ARBlPERP-Air Resources Board 180.00 Permit Fee 38737 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 60.78 Telephone Service 38738 Baxter Edwards 18,165AB Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38739 Court Order 947.80 Wage Garnishment 38740 Bondlogistix L.L.C. 4,000.00 Professional Services-Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 1990-92 COPs 38741 Brookhurst Shopping Center 3,315.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38742 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 38743 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 190.24 Electrical Supplies 38744 CorDaylBentley Systems,Inc. 3.300.00 Engineering Training Registration 38745 Dan Griset 2,250.00 Professional Services-Coordination with Santa Ana Re GW RS 38746 Eaton CwpwallorVMSC Products 17,380.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38747 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 38748 Euclid Shopping Center 20,19228 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38749 Excal Visual Communications 604.75 Safety Video 38750 ESRL Inc. 900.00 Engineering Training Registration 38751 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 617.00 Concrete Cutting 38752 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 38753 Industrial Metal Supply 21620 Metal 38754 Ing.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,402.38 Dues Deduction 38755 Irvine Ranch Water District 30.92 Water Use 38756 Lakewood Publications 78.00 Subscription 38757 LNP Engineering Plastics,Inc. 5,533.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38758 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 53.90 Tools 38759 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 38760 Voided Check - - 38761 OCFA 458.12 Dues Deduction 38762 Pacific Bell 16.27 Telephone Services 38763 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 38764 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 38765 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.D0 Dues Deduction 38766 R.S.Means Company,Inc. 235.35 Publication 38767 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1,400.00 Membership 38768 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 38769 Southern Califomla Edison 37.58 Power 38770 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 5,032.69 Pump 38771 Trails 4 All 1,000.00 Sponsor-Inner Coastal&Watershed Cleanup Day 38772 Tri-Stale Seminar On-the-River 50.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 38773 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/16/01 to 09/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38774 UC Repents 1,090.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 38775 Vedzon California 3,778.30 Telephone Services 38776 Efrain G.Lucena 921.03 Meeting/1-raining Expense Reimbursement 38777 Mark Mutz 601.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38778 Fred J.O'Brian 253.15 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 38779 David L. Ray 695.00 Meeting77rainirg Expanse Reimbursement 38780 George L.Robertson 161.34 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 38781 Charles K.Sudtls 664.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 38782 Mark S.Wilson 849,31 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 38783 Air Products&Chemicals 25,039.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8-89 38754 Ammvhead Products 66,741.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 38785 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 169,7DB.45 Engineering Services J-73-2 38786 AKM Consulting Engineers 49.821.88 Professional Services 7.36,7.39,741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 38787 Black&Veatch Corporation 31,527.07 Engineering Services J-71-3 38788 Boyle Engineering Corporation 115,049.35 Ergineenng Services 1-24,2.31&2-50 38789 Bush&Associates,Inc. 26,780.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 38790 BP Energy Company 154,825.32 Natural Gas-Si No.9900-28 38791 Southern California Marine Institute 62.676.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support,H.B. Investigation Phase III 38792 Delta Dental 51.252.01 Dental Insurance Plan 38793 Kemimn Pacific.Inc. 132,734.85 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 38794 Los Angeles Air Conditioning, Inc. 42.827.47 Construction-Dust Collection Sys.At Phs. 1 &2 Carpenter Shops 38795 Moreland&Associates 27,140.99 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 38796 Order,Degremi Inc. 43,938.00 Construction P2-6r I (2)Barscreen Rakes&Racks 38797 Orange County Water District 75,746.29 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 38798 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 277,311.24 Engineering Services J42,J-35.2 38799 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 87.187.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 38800 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 30.146.71 Hypochlorite&Caustic Soda 38801 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 84.996.53 Electrical&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38802 Sopp Chevrolet 44.731.20 (2)1-Ton,2000 Cheverolet Trucks 38803 Tine RanchlMagan Farms 125,301.02 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 38804 U.S.Peroxide 41.656.45 Collection System Odor&Corrosion Control Chemical Addition Demo,Study 38805 Victor Buick-GMC Truck 33.108.93 (1)GMC Medium Duty Truck 38806 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 67.182.74 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 38807 Woodruff,Spradlin&Sman 72,954.09 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 38808 Adams/Mallory Construction Co., Inc. 137.128.68 Construction J-80 38" J W ConUacling Corporation 182,824.00 Construction P2-60 30810 Margate Construction, Inc. 383,810.00 Construction P2.39,J-71-1 &J-71-2 38811 Urbamec Engineering, Inc. 27.450.00 Construction J-66 38812 A-Plus Systems 5.735.96 Notices&Ads 38813 Action Door Repair Corporation 1.631.00 Door Repairs 38814 Air Liquide Arrerlea Corp. 396.46 Specialty Gasses 38815 Airbome Express 10.68 Alr Freight 38816 Airgas Safety 239.06 Safety Supplies 38817 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 84.39 Mechanical Supplies 38818 Analysts,Inc. 325,98 Testing Kra 38819 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 695.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control o n Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/16/01 to 09130/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38820 Appleone Employment Service 1,704.30 Temporary Employment Services 38821 Asbury Environmental Services 270.00 Waste Oil Removal 38M American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 378.23 Telephone Service 38823 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 178.44 Telephone Service 38824 AWWA-American Water Works Assoc. 495.00 Lab Meeting Registration 38825 Battery Specialties 470.59 Batteries 38826 BloMereux Vitek,Inc. 566.53 lab Supplies 38827 Borthwick,Guy,Beftenhausen 18,665.39 Professional Services P2-84 38828 Broughton Systems-JDE 3.995.00 Professional Services-Software Installation 38829 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1.102.95 Posts&Speed Signs 38830 C.S.U.F.Foundation 19,337.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 38831 Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation 38832 C.R.Nelson P.E. 800.00 Engineedng Consultant 2-41 38833 Carlton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 2,300.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 38834 Cerollo Engineers 186.17 Engineering Services-High Rate Pump Installation on Digester R 38835 Cathcart Garcia von Langer,Engineers 10,223.45 Engineering Services P2.62,J-71-1 &J-71-2 38836 City of Fountain Valley 12.587.78 Water Use 38837 Coast Fire Equipment 11,701.39 Service Agreement 38838 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 7,820.16 Professional Services-Communication,Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 38839 Communications Supply Corp. 105.69 Fiber Optic Parts 38840 Compressor Components of California 1,932.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38841 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 1,687.32 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38842 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,026.86 Plumbing Supplies 38843 Corporate Express 929.01 Office Supplies 38844 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899.09 38845 Cort Furniture Rental 3,155.03 Office Furniture 38846 Coat Containment Solutions 729.78 Worker's Comp.Services 38847 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 750.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 38848 Crans Valve Group 72.50 Publication 38849 Cyclw Envirosystems,Inc. 4,811.79 Professional Services-Anodc Gas Flotation Process 38850 CR&R.Inc. 1,280.00 Container Rentals 38851 David's Tree Service 1,800.00 Tree Mainl.Service 38852 Del Mar Analytical 2,883.00 Biosollds Analysis 38853 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 1,532.95 (1)Analog Modem Module 38854 DeZurik Go Mlsco/SouthWest 5.088.90 Valves 38855 Diamond H Recognition 75.17 Employee Service Awards 38856 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 93.18 Paint Supplies 38857 DDB Engineering,Inc. 4,8D0.00 Temporary Employment Services 38858 DME,Inc. 624.79 Compressor Parts 38859 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 180.00 Medical Screening 38860 Electra-Bond 994.38 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 38861 Employers Group 2,718.48 Memberships 38862 Enchanter,Inc. 7,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 38863 Environmental Resource Association 102.15 Lab Supplies 38864 Express Office Environment 1,404.50 Computer Supplies&Office Supplies 38865 FedEx Corporation 54.44 Air Freight Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 09116101 to 09130/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38866 Fllarsky&Walt L.L.P. 285.00 Professional Services-SPMT Labor Negotiator 38867 FIIeNET Conference Headquarters 2,300.00 Information Technology Training Registration 38868 Filler Supply Company 471.27 FIRM 38869 Fisher Sciengfic Company,L.L.C. 1.353.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 38870 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 730.60 Concrete Cutting 38871 Flo-Systems, Inc. 210.45 Pump Supplies 38872 Fountain Valley Camera 68.17 Photo Supplies 38873 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 735.97 Truck Wash Tickets 38874 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 98.90 Paint Supplies 38875 Fountain Valley Regional Hospital 200.43 Contractual Services-Emergency Room 38876 Franklin Covey 268.96 Of0ce Supplies 38877 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 227.36 Paint Supplies 38878 Frys Electronics 725.37 Computer Supplies 38879 Ganahl Lumber Company 83.34 Lumber/Hardware 38880 Ganaft-Callahan Company 827.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38081 General Petroleum 14,184.45 Unleaded Gasoline 38882 Getinge Castle 108.23 Lab Supplies 38883 Godwin Pumps of America. Inc. 232.D0 Pump Supplies 38884 Gold Systems,Inc. 10,688.75 Professional Services-Data Migration Development&Implementation 38885 Goldenwesl Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 38886 W W Grainger, Inc. 565.01 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38887 Gmybar 73.48 Computer Supplies 38888 GBC(General Binding Corp) 253.37 Repairs to Binding Machine 38889 GPM Pumps,Inc. 6,905.00 Pump 38890 Harbour Engineering Group 2.910.10 Pump Supplies 38891 Harold Primrose Ice 111.00 Ice For Samples 38892 Harrington Industrial Plastics.Inc. 957.15 Plumbing Supplies 38893 Henry Company-Sealants Division 297.39 Sealants 38894 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 93AS Meeting Expenses 38895 Hill Brothers 2.708.40 Chemicals 38896 HIM,Inc. 180.02 Tools 38897 Holmes&Newer, Inc. 14.944.65 Engineering Services P1 44-4 38898 Home Depot 309.81 Small Hardware 38899 Homet Foundation,Inc. 95.40 Training Supplies 38900 Sam Hung 988.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 39901 City of Huntington Beach 19.423.47 Water Use 38902 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 4,305.95 Lab Supplies 38903 Industrial Distribution Group 2,136.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38904 Infinity Technology USA 3,333.04 Computer Supplies 38905 Information Resources 125.00 Human Resources Service 38906 Intelligence Press,Inc. 1,029.00 Subscription 38907 Interstate Battery Systems 979.00 Batteries 38908 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 38909 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.78 Water Use 38910 IBM Corp. 11,707.90 IBM AS1400 Lease 38911 IMI Cash Valve,Inc. 278.02 Valves Page 4 of Claims Paid From 09118I01 to 09/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 38912 IMR! 10,862.50 Temporary Employment Services 30913 Jamison Engineering Contract=,Inc. 19,798.67 Miscellaneous Construction Projects-Diversion Gate&Street Repairs 38914 Jays Catering 1,579.43 Meeting Expenses 38915 Jeff Bigonger 1,003.94 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38916 Johnstone Supply 1,020.99 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38917 Karen Monaco&Associates 12.322.50 FIS Support Services 38918 Krieger&Stewart,In. 1.942.52 Professional Services PI-64 38919 Lab Support 12.817.31 Temporary Employment Services 38920 La Molts Chemical Products 23.80 Chemicals 38921 Lee&Ro,Inc. 7,842.02 Professional Services P247-1 &P2-39 38922 Lindsay Engineering Services 1.875.00 On-site Engineering Training 38923 Lucci's 130.00 Meeting Expense 38924 Lustre-Cal 284.85 Printing Service 38925 Maintenance Technology Corp. 930.47 Welding Services 38926 Margarelis Textile Service 19,140.79 Reconciliation User Fee Program 36927 Martin Container 752.50 Refrigerated Container Ren=Is 38928 MarVac Electronics 127.63 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38929 Manhew Bender&Co..Inc. 561.59 Publication 38930 MCBein Instruments 625.00 Microscopes 38931 McGraw-Hill Company 79.95 Publication 38932 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 249.78 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 38933 Media Clips,Inc. 99.80 Notices 38934 Medlin Controls Co. 302.68 Instrument Supplies 38935 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 38936 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 16,158.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38937 Miller Equipment Co. 667.26 Auto Parts&Repair 38938 Mission Uniform Service 4,096.29 Uniform Rentals 38939 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Buns Rental 38940 MotoPholo 128.09 Photographic Services 38941 MAACO Auto painting&Bodyworks 303.50 Vehicle Repair&Painting 38942 MSC Applied Environmental Sciences 18,128.83 Professional Services J-85 38943 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 38944 National Plant Services,Inc. 6,135.00 Vacuum Truck Services 38945 National Technology T=refer,Inc. 1,095.00 O&M Training Registration 38946 Neel Supply Co. 012.75 Plumbing Supplies 38947 NetVerant of Slllwr=Valley 1,338.02 Security System Maintenance 38948 Newark Electronics 310.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38949 Nlckey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,138.15 Lubricant/Dlesel Fuel 38950 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounling 4.189.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 38951 J.Nixon 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38952 The Norco Companies 157,14 Mall Delivery Service 38953 Northern Tool&Equipment Company, Inc. 7,955.83 (2)Honda Generator 38954 NAFA,Inc. 390.00 Membership 38955 NAB Associates,Inc. 1.644.00 Toxicity Analysis 38955 NST Network Support Team 1,146.25 Professional Services-TroubelshaNing External E-Mall Server&Network Analysis 38957 Ccesns 2001 MTS/IEEE 395.00 Compliance Meeting Registration Page 5 of 8 Claim Paid From 09MG101 to 09/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 38958 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,894.69 Office Supplies 38959 Orange County Hose Company 167.09 Hose Supplies 38960 Oxygen Service Company 3,530.68 Specialty Gases 38961 OCB Reprographics 4,067.48 Printing Service-MO V26100 38962 Pacific Bell 1,269.26 Telephone Services 38963 Pacific Mechanical Supply 5,139.25 Plumbing Supplies 38964 Pacific Parts&Controls 4.266.54 Electrical Supplies 38965 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 1,047.81 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38966 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 1,862.45 Hydrochloric Acid 38967 Pagenel 3,246.94 Paging Services 38968 Pearl All&Craft 217.82 Art&Graphic Supplies 30969 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 298.02 Lab Supplies 38970 Peter Anderson,MD Medical Group 77.22 Contract Services-Emergency Room 38971 K.Plam 1.059.91 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 38972 Plumbing&Industrial Supply 1,741.50 Plumbing Pans&Supplies 38973 Polydyne,Inc. 8,936.54 CatimniC Polymer MO 3.11-92 38974 Power Bros. Machine,Inc. 825.00 Mechanical Maint. 38975 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 538.20 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 38976 Primary Source 8.944.40 Office Furniture 38977 Process Equipment Company 2,099.22 Pump Assembly,Pans&Supplies 38978 Projects Partners 16.521.91 Temporary Employment Services 38979 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 12.891.91 Sewedlne Cleaning 38980 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc 395.00 Maintenance Agreement-Underground Storage Tanks 38981 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. 487.00 Fence Repair for Manhole Access on SCE Easement 38982 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,416.49 Trash Removal 38983 Reliastar 8,449.45 Employee Medical Health Premium 38984 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 331.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 38985 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 4,786.50 Engineering Services P2-85-1 38986 S.G.E.,Inc. 297.00 Lab Training Registration 38987 Sancon Engineering. Inc. 5,425.00 Pumping Services 38988 City of Seal Beach 125.69 Water Use 38989 Seavemures 1.750.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 38990 Snimadzu Scientific Instruments,Inc. 85.00 Lab Supplies 38991 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.333.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38992 Snap-On Tools 12,094.86 Software-Automotive Repair&Diagnostic 38993 Sola-Late,Inc. 750.00 (2)Solar Tubes&Ventillation Kits for Construction Trailers 38994 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 228.61 Permit Fees 3SD95 Special Plastic Systems, Inc. 2,804.14 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 38996 Spherion Corporation 322.15 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 38997 Stepan Company 2,140.67 Reconciliation User Fee Program 38998 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 786.97 Stationery&Office Supplies 38999 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,146.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 39000 Super Power Products 1,161.00 Janitorial Supplies 39001 SARBS-CWFA 10.00 Membership-Santa Ana River Basin Section 39002 SETAC 610.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 39003 SS Mechanical Corp. 10,448.00 Installation of Pressure Relief Valve on(4)Caustic Pumps @ Pit. 1 Heaoworks Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 09/16/01 to 09/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 39004 Sevem Them Laboratories,Inc. 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 39005 Techno CoaUngs 19,90.00 Application of Floor Coating at Central Generation Building 3900fi Tetra Tech,Inc. 4,382.00 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 39007 The Orange County Register 1,837.44 Notices&Ads 39008 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,259.89 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 39M ThyssenKmpp Elevator 3,114.69 Elevator Maintenance 39010 Daily Pilot 162.50 Nmices&Ads 39011 Tongs Lock&Safe Service&Sales 161.68 Locks&Keys 39012 Top Hat Productions 85.95 Catering Services 39013 Tran Consulting Engineers 13,089.00 Engineering Services 1-17&7-21 39014 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 23.26 Truck Supplies 39015 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 63.96 Truck Supplies 39016 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 39017 Teksyslems 10.356.00 Temporary Employment Services 39018 TRW EMCICalibralion Services 135.00 Equipment Cedifcatbn 39019 United Parcel Service 695.61 Parcel Services 39020 Naval Post Graduate School 4.764.42 Professional Services J-85 39D21 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,200.00 Temporary Employment Service 39022 Vapax,Inc. 8.01778 Professional Services J-71-7 39023 Varian,Inc. 779.37 Lab Supplies 39024 Verizon Calffomia 794.02 Telephone Services 39025 Veme's Plumbing 50.00 Testing&Certification of Back0ow Devices at Pits.1 It 2 and Pump Stations 39026 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,30620 Vision Service Premium 39027 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 6,304.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 39D28 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,133.00 Security Guards 39029 Winds Sanitary Supply 310.79 Janitorial Supplies 39030 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 1,363.00 Inspect&Repair Sinkhole on west side of Headworks C 39031 WEF 112.00, Membership-Water Environment Federation 39032 Xerox Corporation 4,581.03 Copier Leases 39033 The Yakima Company 6,062.85 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 39034 Zee Medical 1.508.61 First Aid Supplies 39035 Mike Prlich&Sons 18,407.70 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrades 39036 Union Bank of California 20,314.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 39037 Steven R.DeWilde 149.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 39038 Wanda R.Hagerty 182.80 Meetingrfmining Expanse Reimbursement 39039 Deirdre E.Hunter 157.44 Meetingirrreini g Expense Reimbursement 39040 Brian K. Reed 1,157.20 Meeting/!"reining Expense Reimbursement 39041 Douglas M.Stewart 595.00 Meetingrlmining Expense Reimbursement 39042 Robert C.Thompson 1,536.15 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 39043 Employee Activity Committee 950.00 Service Award Expense 39044 Harbor Bay Inc. 6,700.00 Construction J-60 39045 Orange County Sanitation District 1,230.44 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,160,149.11 Page 7 of 8 Claim Paid From 09116/01 to 09130/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 24323-24437 Employee Paychecks $ 177.715.18 Biweekly Payroll 09/19/01 64984-65434 Direct Deposit Statements 767,878.62 Biweekly Payroll 09/19/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 935,593.80 Wlra Transfer Prime State Street Bank a Trust Co.of CA $ 270,841.40 September Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Total Wins Transfer Payments $ 270.841.40 Total Claims Paid 09/16101 -091=1 $ 5,388,584.31 Page 8 of 8 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, September 26, 2001 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, September 26, 2001 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Roy Moore, Director, Guest Norm Eckenrode, Chair Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Peter Green, Vice Chair Don Hughes Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Doug Korthof Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Don Schultz Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee Denis Baker Jim Silva, County Supervisor Ryal Wheeler Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Doug Korthof spoke on eliminating the 301(h)waiver and indicated that Newport Beach voted unanimously to support secondary treatment. He also expressed concern about the amount of reserves and the potential liability issues of not disclosing low levels of pollution. He is going to be requesting that a data collection program be set up on people who have reported getting sick from going into the ocean. He also requested that a hot line be established with a live person answering the phone, not just an answering machine. Mr. Don Schultz expressed his appreciation for allowing volunteers to help with the summer studies. He said that it gave them an opportunity to work directly with professionals from several different fields. Minutes of the Steering Committee i Page 2 September 26, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the August 22, 2001 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode reviewed a memo outlining a conflict between the League of California Cities annual conference and the Sanitation District's December Board meeting. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to keep the December 19, 2001 meeting date. Chair Eckenrode also reported on the SAWPAIOCSD Joint Management Committee meeting that was held on September 25 in an attempt to reach agreement on the SARI line and related issues. Three additional monthly meetings have been scheduled. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the next Directors Workshop is scheduled for Saturday. November 3, between 8 and 11 at the Sanitation District. The issues to be discussed are the progress on the ocean monitoring program and the beginning of discussions on the science, technology, review of the costs and financing of levels of treatment. Notification will be sent to all directors. The Orange County Water District will hold a quarterly GW RS workshop on Saturday. November 17 at its office. There are four members of the District's staff who are reservists. They are potentially subject to active duty. Staff asked the Committee members to consider revising the military leave policy to allow these employees to receive pay and family benefits if they are called to serve. Motion: Moved, seconded and approved to authorize staff to prepare a revision to the Military Leave policy and present it to the Directors for approval at the October Board meeting. Director Pat McGuigan expressed concern about the potential fiscal and operational impacts reported at the Regional Board's workshop on the draft stormwater permits. Action: Bob Ghirelli will prepare a report for all directors and city managers on this workshop. A status report will also be prepared on the CMOM program. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that staff has received information regarding the establishment of new security measures for the Districfs facilities, and these discussions need to be held in closed session per Government Code Section 54957. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to add a discussion of security issues to the closed session agenda. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 September 26, 2001 Mr. Woodruff reported that Crow Winthrop had filed a second lawsuit challenging the fee ordinance. The original case is scheduled for trial on November 19. The District sent a letter to Crow Winthrop about damage by a contractor to a telephone conduit serving the Michelson Pump Station, and advising Crow Winthrop that an invoice will be forthcoming to pay the costs of having to manually monitor the Pump Station during the time it took to repair the line. This line provides remote telemetry to the control center on the operating status of the Pump Station. The contractor has also demolished the landscaping that was required by Crow Winthrop around the Pump Station and reimbursement is being requested. Mr. Woodruff described the recommended changes to a District Resolution, as well as the enactment of several Ordinances, most of which are housekeeping issues. They cover requiring claims by public agencies,establishing a statute of limitations period of 90 days for writs of mandate, correcting meeting times for Board and Committee meetings, and changes to the public comments portion of agendas. The last item was changing from Robert's Rules of Order to the District's own Rules of Order for conducting meetings. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize General Counsel to prepare the necessary revisions and recommendations for consideration at the October Board Meeting." (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Item A) A. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in October were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for October 24, 2001 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for October 24,2001 at 7 p.m. Minutes of the Steering Committee .' Page 4 September 26,2001 (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 5:55 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957 and 54957.6, to discuss security issues, and review and approve the General Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and Compensation. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:37 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:37 p.m. mitted by: appan t ring Committee Secretary Gwy.AeYgm t "WrrmileeYHl5epb91B015LMhMUOoc t Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2001 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 3, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Don Bankhead Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Kenneth Blake Mike Moore, ECM Manager Tony Kawashima Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Anna Piercy Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager George Robertson, ECM Senior Scientist Directors Absent: Layne Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Mark A. Murphy Others: Doug Korthoff (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Doug Korthoff addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues and his opposition to the waiver. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the September 5,2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance t and Technical Services Committee Page 2 October 3, 2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair McGuigan reported that representatives of the Ocean Ouffall group recently attended a Santa Ana City Council meeting and urged the council to vote for full secondary treatment. Director McGuigan responded that no action or decision should be made until all testing data and technical information was received and analyzed. In response to a request for her written comments or speech, she stated that no one prepared a speech for her. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the Regional Water Quality Control Board has released two draft permits for public comments on local sewer systems and storm water runoff. Both permits would require a change in the way cities operate their local sewers. The public comment period will end on October 26 and the Board will consider adopting the permits in December. Staff has met with representatives of the cities to discuss the proposed requirements. Mr. Anderson also reported that a joint management committee had been formed comprised of SAWPA and OCSD board members in an effort to move towards a resolution of outstanding issues on the SARI line relocation project. The committee will be meeting monthly unfit issues are resolved. An MOU for the SARI line relocation is still in draft forth. Short-term emergency repairs are underway. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. OMTS01-42 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. b. OMTS01-43 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report,which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 7(a)and (b) under Consent Calendar. (8) ACTION ITEMS (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS01-44 Ocean Discharge Issues Update Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, advised that the agenda report in the OMTS agenda package would focus on the broader scientific, technology and financial issues associated with the ocean discharge permit renewal and would include a summary of the Huntington Beach data evaluation as well. v Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 October 3, 2001 George Robertson, Senior Scientist, reviewed the history of the district's ocean monitoring program and summarized results of studies conducted since 1974 to document the location of the district's treated wastewater plume. Historically, the plume is located at depth approximately 2-3 miles offshore Huntington Beach and approximately 1/2-mile offshore Newport Beach, regardless of the season. Initial results from this summer's special studies have shown the shoreward edge of the plume approximately 1.5 miles offshore in Huntington Beach and approximately one mile offshore in Newport Beach. b. OMTS01-45 FY 2001/02 Operational Research Program Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager, reviewed the various operational research programs the District is undertaking to improve efficiency and reduce costs associated with treatment plant operations and maintenance. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of InformationTechnology, reported additional staff would be hired in the next six months in order to support the various technologies being implemented throughout the District. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported electrical energy consumption within the administration building and laboratory has been reduced approximately 16% per month, but the plants were saving 4%. Also, the current research program on microfiltration was about one week behind schedule and the week would probably not be made up. A contractor is on site and is beginning construction at Plant 2 on the concrete slab for the unit. (12) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Mike Moore, ECM Manager, reported that a recommendation should be coming to the committee next month for an agreement with ICOR. He reported that initial testing results with a chemical stabilizer to produce Class A biosolids with Tule Ranch was showing to be very successful. (13) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy reported on the ocean discharge issue workshop that is scheduled for Saturday, November 3,from 8:00 a.m.to 11:00 a.m. to be held in the OCSD boardroom. In addition,a groundwater replenishment system workshop is scheduled for Saturday, November 17, from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m, at the Orange County Water District. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 October 3, 2001 (14) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for November 7, 2001 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Submitted by: /J 41 1u .ef� Penny M. K Operations, Maintenan66 and Technical Services Committee Secretary \\IeadWaMl\.p.dM%genda\OMTS0001@001 OMTS Minules\100301 minutnAx DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, October4, 2001, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design,and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, October 4,2001, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Guy Carrozzo Bob Dolan, Director of Operations& Brian Donahue Maintenance Alice Jempsa Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Beth Krom John Linder, Construction Manager Tod Ridgeway Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Jon Thomsic, Project Manager Directors Absent: William Cassidy, Project Manager Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Sejal Patel, Project Engineer Chuck Hodge, Project Engineer Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: C. T. Bien, Fluor Signature Services Kirk Shimazu, Fluor Signature Services Dennis Kasper, Parsons (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Doug Korthof spoke against the 301(h)waiver and for secondary treatment. Mr. Joe Racano also spoke against the 301(h)waiver and indicated that he will be taking his message to the cities. PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 October 4, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the September 6, 2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson challenged the speakers to show respect to all parties when public comments are given. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the Regional Water Quality Control Board has released two draft permits for public comments on local sewer systems and stone water runoff. Both permits would require a change in the way cities operate their local sewers. RWQCB workshops are scheduled between now and the end of the year. Staff has met with representatives of the cities to discuss the proposed requirements. (T) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported that emergency repairs are underway on the 21-inch Huntington Beach Purchase, a line that could potentially be a source of beach contamination. The line is scheduled to be abandoned when the Hilton Hotel project is completed. Mr. Ludwin also reported that a joint management committee has been formed comprised of SAWPA and OCSD board members in an effort to move forward towards resolution on outstanding issues. The committee will be meeting monthly unfit issues are resolved. An MOU for the SARI line relocation is still in draft form. Short-term emergency repairs are underway. Mr. Ludwin reported that the 54-inch Bushard Trunk(in Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley)is scheduled to be replaced in the next couple of years. It was built in 1954 and is unlined concrete. During the investigation of the trunk line it was found that there are areas of the walls of the pipe are severely corroded and in some places there is no metal reinforcing bars. Staff is investigating ways to shore k up in the short-term until the replacement is complete. The final report with recommendations is due in the next month and will be presented to the PDC Committee. Mr. William Cassidy reported on the status of the purchase of property for the 10 Street Pump Station relocation. Negotiations are underway with the new owner, and a contract will be brought to the board within the next month. (8) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 October 4, 2001 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-f) a. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There is one change order this month for PDC Committee approval. b. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: PSA and Addenda Report. This Is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and no Addenda approved by the General Manager from August 24 through September 20, 2001. C. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. d. QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: Quarterly Contract Staffing Assignments Report This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. f. QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg presented a summary of the construction projects that will be required in this project and their estimated costs. Work continues on finalizing the Operations Agreement between OCSD and OCWD. The agreement will be presented to FAHR Committee and the Board in October. PDC Committee Minutes v Page 4 October 4, 2001 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO RECEIVE AND FILE: Quarterly Groundwater Replenishment System(GWRS) Status Report. This is an information only item. g. PDC01.63 MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063,with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$5,345 and 30 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $182,345;and (2) Accept Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1,Job No. SP19950063,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (a) a. PDC01-64 Status of Reinvention Project. Information only item. Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance, provided an update on the Reinvention project,which is a series of program parts that are designed to reduced O&M costs through automation and work and business practices improvements. The estimated cost savings to date are$21.2 million cumulative. Staff will continue to perform research on cost savings ideas, finish automation projects, complete maintenance planning program, and begin the asset management portion of the project. Mr. Dolan said that the reasons for the successes to date are because of detailed planning,staff involvement, management and board support, District-supplied resources and the ability to work through cultural issues. (12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e) a. PDC01-65 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget increase of$9,079.600 for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P137,for a total project budget of $84.529,600; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37,on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3)Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Contract to Margate Construction, Incorporated, for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37,for an amount not to exceed $70,366,000. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 October 4, 2001 Staff described the project and explained that the difference between the engineers estimate and the bids were the result of the engineer using outdated hourly rates for electrical and Instrumentation labor and did not include the payment and insurance bonds. If the engineer's estimate had been based on current information it would have been $72,487,000. Staff is working with two professional societies to develop guidelines and procedures to allow for better review of estimates by others. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Staff also requested authority to negotiate a change order with the contractor to implement a contractor-initiated change cost savings program,wherein the District and the contractor would share the savings 50/50. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to included a Contractor-initiated Change Cost Sharing program to all future projects where appropriate. b. PDC01-66 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment of$551,500 for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation,Job No. J-84,for a total project budget of$795,800; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services for the conceptual design (Phase II)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation,Job No. J-84,for an additional amount of$272.000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $428,800. Fluor Signature Services presented its Phase I Conceptional Report that evaluated the working environment in the Administration Building and included recommendations of enclosing the atrium and reducing its size as well as a new building to house IT and underground parking near the rear parking area. Phase II, the detailed design concept would include expanded visual images, more detailed layouts and an updated cost estimate. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Directors Alice Jempsa and Guy Carrozzo voted no. C. PDC01-67 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$350,000 for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7,for a total project budget of$2,732,000; (2) PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 October 4,2001 Approve plans and specifications for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project,Job No. J-71-7, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. PDC01-68 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a new budget of$440,000 for Strategic Plan Update,Job No.J-40-8, from the Orange County Sanitation District's Capital Reserves; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Sole Source Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee to prepare an update to the 1999 Strategic Plan for a total amount not to exceed $350,000. The work included in this update will result in revised cost estimates for all of the different treatment level alternatives and associated capital projects that would be required for each alternative. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. e. PDC01-69 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve an increase to the approved sole source equipment purchase with Hatch & Kirk Incorporated for an additional amount of$14,440 for a total amount not to exceed$127,300, in connection with Central General Automation, Job No.J-79. The members expressed concern about the change in contract price after initial negotiations on a sole source purchase. The General Manager will discuss the changes with the supplier. Future negotiations will be done by contract administrators or the purchasing team to ensure that all elements of a contract are included when an equipment bid is requested. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY There were none. PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 October 4, 2001 (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 1, 2001 at 5 p.m. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. Submitted by: JTappan Committee Secretary G 1p.GteVpmNWOQ'NOIVlmM1IWOI ptl1Y0L1iw1uMc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To BO.or DU. 10/04/01 10/24/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO1-63 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Engineer SUBJECT: ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. SP19950063 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$5,345 and 30 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $182,345; and (2)Accept Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. SP19950063, Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, includes work to retrofit the existing storage bays at the Warehouse with structural walls to enclose open bays. This improvement provides environmental protection against temperature variations, dust and moisture, and will also provide security for the warehouse. • Lee & Ro, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the Contract was awarded to Ark Construction Company on December 20, 2000. • Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work to Job No. SP19950063. There is one omission associated with this Change Order. There is a 30 day time extension associated with this Change Order. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date March 12, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date June 9, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date June 9, 2001 Revised Completion Date July 9, 2001 Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Gory danapendeecand Agenda Repo 001 Board Agenda Rap S%W 13C GR995 3dx Pagel Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 1 Electrical Modifications 1 $5,345 30 1 Omission TOTAL—Change Order No. 1 $5 345 30 Job Completion The project is 100% complete and ready for closeout. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 177.000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) $ 5,345.00 Change Orders to Date $ 5,345.00 Percentage Increase to Date 3.02% Amended Contract Price $ 182,345.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000-01 Budget, Section 8, Page 151) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CECIA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt and a Notice of Exemption has been filed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order a:w.y.emaymm�pmeanmms l eons ny.,oa gepo %IW%kuc.Sa,evwoes.dm Page BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP19950063 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS TRlS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET, ,INCREASE BUDGET _.. TO DATE„ REQUEST , AUTHORIZATION -T.O,DATE;_, .TO ° 1 Project Development $ Studies/Permit5n $ - $ 1,000 $ 5,334 $ 6,334 $ 1,000 $ 5,334 $ 6.334 $ 6.334 100% Design Staff $ 11.400 $ 39,000 $ 8.274 $ 47,274 $ 39,000 $ 8,274 $ 47.274 $ 47.274 100% Consultant PSA $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 $ 14,800 99% Construction Contract $ 44.000 $ 177.000 $ 5.345 $ 182.345 $ 177.000 $ 5,345 $ 182,345 $ 176.288 96% Construction Administration $ - $ 11.000 $ 3.223 $ 14.223 $ 11,000 $ 3.223 $ 14,223 $ 14,223 100% Construction Inspection $ 5,000 $ 11.000 $ 6.149 $ 16.149 $ 11,000 $ 5.149 $ 16.149 $ 16,149 100% Contingency $ - $ 17.000 $ 17.000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL is 60,400 $ 271.000 $ 10,325 $ 281,325 $ 254.000 $ 27,325 $ 281.325 $ 274,068 97% C UGHNMP1995080 Warehouse EncNCoN1 budget table ablD'olncla CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1 Job Nos. SP1995063 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE( (DAYS) (DAYS( CONTRACT 12/20/00 $ 177,000.00 $ 177,000.00 0.00% 90 90 'Approval Dale Pending by POC Committee H'.1wp.dlalengVobs and conlradslP146.2\Change OrdeMCOI.stalus.zls Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Date: October 24, 2001 Job: Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1. Job No. SP19950063 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dedest) 5,345.0 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish labor and material to install the following additional electrical hardware. 1. Doorstrike solenoids for each of two exit doors 2. Power supply for each of two exit doors 3. Motion detectors for each of two exit doors 4. ExiVemergency light fixtures for each of two exit doors The above electrical equipment was required for electronic operation of the exit doors using card readers and was not included in the original contract. Additional conduit and wire was also necessary to connect the above equipment. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,345.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $5,345.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 30 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ark Construction Comoanv C.O. No.: One (1) Date: October 24 2001 Job: Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No, SP19950063 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that thirty (30) calendar days are required to perform the work included in this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 12, 2001 Original Contract Time: 90 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 9, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 30 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 30 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 9, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: July 9, 2001 Original Contract Price $ 177,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 5,345.00 Amended Contract Price $ 182,345.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ark Construction Comoanv C.O. No.: One (1) Date: October 24, 2001 Job: Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1. Job No. SP19950063 Board Authorization Date: October 24, 2001 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Ark Construction Company Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeang Date To ad.of Dir. 10/4/01 10/24/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-6s 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIER NOS. 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB. NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget increase of$9,079,600 for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37,for a total project budget of$84,529,600; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Primary Clarifier Nos.16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Contract to Margate Construction, Incorporated, for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for an amount not to exceed $70,366,000. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Strategic Plan requires additional primary treatment capacity to be in place at Plant No. 1 by 2003. • This project includes design of an additional 96 million gallons per day (mgd)of primary treatment facilities and improvements to existing Primary Clarifier Nos. 1-15. • The plans and specifications for Job No. P1-37 were completed in May 2001. The plans and specifications for this project, Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, were bid on July 31, 2001. Current Project Budget $75,450,000 Construction Budget $60,400,000 Engineer's 100% Design Estimate $60,390,816 Engineer's Revised Estimate $72,487,445 Low Responsible Bid $70,366.000 High Bid $79,488,144 Number of Bids 5 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$1,798,000 Is being requested for Construction Staff/Administration and $489,000 for Construction (Other), which includes money for testing and specialty inspection services. Staff is also requesting authorization of$70,366,000 for the Construction Contract. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8—Page 68) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) RW.: MOM Pagel The Construction Contract line item is being increased by$9,966,000. This includes$886,400 from , Contingency. The total budget increase being requested is$9,079,600. Y The proposed source of funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)Capital Improvement Reserves. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In September 1998,the District issued a Professional Services Agreement(PSA)to Brown and Caldwell for preliminary design studies,final design, and services during construction for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31. This project includes design of an additional 96 million gallons per day (mgd)of primary treatment facilities and improvements to existing Primary Clarifier Nos. 6-15. In January 2001 during the final design. Brown and Caldwell submitted the Engineer's Estimate of $60,390,816, as required in their Scope of Work. District staff used the Engineers Estimate during the FY2001/02 budget cycle to determine the budgetary needs of this project, Job No. P1-37. As a result, the Construction Contract budget is $60,400,000. In July 2001, the District opened five bids for Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37. The following summarizes the submitted bids: Contractor Total Bid Margate Construction, Inc. $70,366,000 J.F.Shea Construction $72,250,694 Kiewit Pacific $72,639,000 J.R. Filanc $74,701.000 Archer Western Contractors $79,488.144 In August 2001, Brown and Caldwell submitted a revised Engineer's Estimate as requested by District staff in an effort to identify the discrepancy between the January 2001 Engineer's Estimate, and the aforementioned bid amounts. The revised Engineer's Estimate is $72.487,445. The following table summarizes major differences between the revised estimate and the original estimate: Pro eet Line Item - Revised Estimate Original Estimate Difference Labor $20,440,638 $13,456,465 $6,984,173 Electrical/Instrumentation $10775,520 $6,022,870 $4,752,650 Payment Bond $682,109 0 $682,109 Builders All-Risk Insurance $68,893 0 $68,893 Earthquake Insurance $404,116 0 $404,116 The major discrepancy between the original Engineer's Estimate and the revised estimate was the use of incorrect labor rates (approximately$7 Million). Labor rates used in the original Engineers Estimate were about four years out of date, did not include union dues, and were a national average instead of site speck (i.e. Orange County). w,.�: Page 2 Also, the complexity of the electrical/instrumentation was not adequately accounted for in the original Engineers Estimate (approximately$4.7 Million). The original Engineer's Estimate used 8% of the total estimate to arrive at the estimated cost of the electrical work,which does not accurately reflect current Orange County Sanitation District (District)Standards. In addition, District staff added the requirement for the Contractor to supply Earthquake Insurance and Builders All-Risk Insurance following submittal of the original estimate (approximately$475,000). Also, other factors, which were not considered in detail in the Engineer's Estimate and may have contributed to the difference include: • Detailed Costs associated with the rehabilitation work, • Future fuel/energy prices, • Future wage rates, • Escalation to mid-point of construction, • Contractor indirect costs, • Bid environment (is., how busy the Contractors are at the time of the bid). The following summarizes Staffs opinion of what the actual cost of this job requires: Estimate Total Cost Margate Construction Inc. $70,366,000 J.F.Shea Construction $72,250,694 Revised Engineer's Estimate $72,487,445 Kiewit Pacific $72,639,000 J.R. Filanc $74,701,000 e...,...nne,..,...., r................ 0498 4ee Average $72,488,828 The range between the original Engineer's Estimate and the highest bidder is approximately $19 Million. Elimination of the high and the low estimates narrows the range to approximately $4 Million. If the true value of the work is assumed to be the average ($72,488,828), then the following observations are made: Estimate Percent Under Percent Over Average Average e Original Engineers Estimate 17% Margate Construction Inc. 3% J.F.Shea <1% Revised Engineers Estimate <1% Kiewit Pacific <1% J.R. Filanc 3% Archer Western 10% n ,.e, MOM Page 3 Findinas/Recommendation v Staff has verified the validity of the revised cost estimate provided by Brown and Caldwell. The revised cost estimate is in line with the bids submitted on July 31, 2001. Staff recommends award of a Construction Contract to Margate Construction, Incorporated in an amount not to exceed $70,366,000. The Engineers original estimate was significantly lower than the lowest bidder for this project. This has caused additional delays to the schedule, as well as additional administrative burden and associated costs to the Orange County Sanitation District (District). As a result, Staff has initiated a plan to improve the accuracy of the Engineer's Estimate provided on future projects. Staff will develop this plan with the help of the American Association of Cost Engineers International. It is hoped that applicable standards be put in place to insure accurate and consistent cost estimating. Basis of Recommendation Over the past two years, District staff has evaluated each project element associated with this project in great detail. In addition, a Value Engineering Study was conducted throughout the design to insure that the life cycle costs associated with the design of this project would be minimized without sacrificing reliability, redundancy, enhanced operation, optimal treatment, and reduced maintenance. The need of the expansion of the primary treatment process, 96 million gallons per day (mgd) has been identified in the District's 1999 Strategic Plan. In addition to providing additional primary treatment capacity, this project includes the following additional benefits: • Correction of existing design deficiencies prevalent in Primary Clarifier Nos. 6-15 necessary to improve the treatment process, reduce operation and maintenance costs, and reduce treatment costs associated with downstream processes • Additional chemical treatment facilities necessary to improve the treatment process, reduce operation and maintenance costs, and reduce treatment costs associated with downstream processes • Flow paced chemical addition necessary to reduce chemical costs • Enhanced monitoring necessary to improve the treatment process, reduce operation and maintenance costs, and reduce treatment costs associated with downstream processes • Improved foul air odor control to reduce foul air emissions • Necessary improvements to existing facilities to facilitate unmanned operations associated with the entire primary treatment process at Plant No. 1 • Retrofit of existing Primary Clarifiers necessary to respond to peak flow needs from a remote location • Provisions to feed the rehabilitated trickling filters upon completion • Provisions to feed the Groundwater Replenishment System upon completion • Provisions to treat backwash flows stemming from the Groundwater Replenishment System upon completion a-.: � Page 4 1 • Sufficient capacity to treat additional future flows (ie., Santa Ana River Interceptor) necessary to feed the Groundwater Replenishment System Y • Relocation of electrical loads necessary to reduce power costs associated with the Laboratory, Control Center, and the Administration Building ALTERNATIVES • Option 1 —NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE The no action alternative involves fling the plans and specifications for future use. Future capital costs will be larger due to inflation. Annual cost savings associated with improved treatment-reduced maintenance, unmanned operations, and reduced chemical costs will not be realized under this approach. Under this option,failure to implement the proposed improvements to the existing foul air collection and treatment system could result in additional foul air odor complaints from the public and fines from the South Coast Air Quality District. Provisions to feed the Groundwater Replenishment System would be limited. Implementation of this alternative would force the Orange County Sanitation District (District)to allocate additional funds necessary to address future storm flows that the Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31 could have been equipped to store. Finally, future compliance problems associated with increased flows and insufficient capacity could result in fines from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and could also affect the District's ability to attain future 301(h) waivers. . Option 2—REDUCE THE SCOPE AND RE-BID THE JOB The District could chose to reduce the installed capacity of the Pt-37 Primary Clarifiers in an effort to save the additional funds needed to construct the entire set of Primary Clarifier Nos. 16-31. The District's Master Plan requires the installation of the additional 96 million gallons per day(mgd) capacity by the year 2003 in order to treat future expected incoming flows. Future capital costs will be larger, due to inflation (although not as much as Option 1). Additional costs will be incurred to re- design the work effort, re-bid the job, and award the construction contract. Annual cost savings associated with improved treatment, reduced maintenance, unmanned operations, and reduced chemical costs will not be realized under this approach. Finally, future compliance problems associated with increased flows and insufficient capacity could result in fines from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and could also affect the District's ability to attain future 301(h) waivers. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR approved on September 29, 1999, and Notice of Determination filed on September 30, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Bid Tabulation 4. Bid Summary 5. P1-37 Revised Construction Cost Estimate cover letter, dated August 21, 2001 CJH:jak:jo GW,dw%wwal WAgenda Rep ft=01 Ba JAgeM RepoM1 IWM3.eP141.dw PeK d:ermne Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED I ', PROPOSED FUNDS THIS. PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED- PROJECT BUDGET; t REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ 74,000 100% Design Staff $ 1.127000 $ 1127.000 $ 1.056,600 $ 1.058600 $ 1,056,600 100% Consultant PSA 1 $ 3,600,000 1 $ 3.600.000 $ 3.578.324 1 $ 3,578,324 $ 3,380,770 94% Construction Contract $ 60.400.000 $ 9,966.000 $ 70.366,000 $ - $ 70.368000 $ 70,366.000 $ 0% Construction Oilier $ 504,000 $ 504.000 $ 15000 $ 489,000 $ 504,000 $ 15,000 3% Construction Staff $ 1,822,000 $ 1.822,000 $ 24,000 $ 1,798,000 $ 1,822,000 $ 24,000 1% Conlin enc $ 7,923000 $ 886,400 $ 7.036,600 TOTAL $ 38.450.000 $ 75,450,000 $ 9.079,600 1$ 84,529,600 $ 4.747.924 1$ 72.653.000 $ 77.400,924 1 $ 4,550,370 6% G9wp.dtaWg172 odgeWl-3TIGdgllableawardxls)Disldcts E Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. Pt-37 Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Total Project Budget: $75,450,000 Total Revised Budget: $84,529,600 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Dale of Project: September 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 9/23198 Original PSA Provide engineering services for 96-mgd Primary Clarifiers $1.993.000 $1.993,000 and Related Facilities 4/28199 1 Provide engineering services for: (1)Rehabilitation of existing $863,185 $2.856,185 Primary Clarifiers; (2)Centralized sludge collection and transfer facilities; (3)Modification to influent distribution structure;and 4 Installation of trickling filter feed line 11/15/99 2 Provide engineering services needed to conduct an $21,557 $2.877.742 evaluation of high rate clarifiers as recommended by the Value En ineer 12/15/99 3 Provide engineering design services necessary to improve $189.537 $3.067.279 odor control and automate the P1-33 Clarifiers. Provide construction support services involved with additional work added in Addenda Nice. 1-3 8/23100 4 Provide engineering design services necessary to add $511.045 $3,678,324 another control building, retrofit controls, and effluent monitoring, install a pilot coagulation plant, provide CMMS work, incorporate current design standards,and miscellaneous re-work. CW WPW147 PSA STATUS REPORT T eSCCONSTRUCTCONTRACTAW 09/06/01 Revised 0511 Vea v July 31, 2001 1100 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.: 6 BID TABULATION PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES JOB NO. P1-37 Original Engineer's Estimate:$60,390,816 Construction Contract Budget: $60,400,000 Revised Engineer's Estimate: $72,487,445 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION $ 70,366.000 2. J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION $ 72.250.694 3. KIEWITPACIFIC $ 72,639.000 4. J.R. FILANC $ 74,701,000 5. ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS $ 79,488,144 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ it. $ 12. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to MARGATE CONSTRUCTION in the bid amount of$70,366,000 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C:\FileNetWIP\P1.37 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05/19/98 OCSO . P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain valley,CA 9272M127 . (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY _. PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITES JOB NO. P1-37 MARGATE J.F.SHEA KIEWIT Item Approx. aty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ $ 300,000.00 $ $ 200,000.00 $ $ 150,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ $ 69,000,000.00 $ $ 71,150,694.00 $ $ 71,359,000.00 3 1 Lump Sum $ - $ 500,000.00 $ - $ 500,000.00 $ - $ 500,000.00 4a 1 Lump Sum $ 130,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 250,000.00 4b 1 Lump Sum $ 436.000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 380,000.00 $ 70,366,000.00 $ 72,250,694.00 $ 72,639,000.00 'Add(+)or Delete(-) $ - b 70,366,000.00 $ 72,250,694.00 $ 72,639,000.00 MARGATE J.F.SHEA KIEWIT J.R.FILANC ARCHER WESTERN Item Approx. Qty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ - $ 50.000.00 $ - $ 5,000,000.00 $ - $ - 2 1 Lump Sum $ $ 73,528,000.00 $ $ 73,463,144.00 $ 3 1 Lump Sum $ $ 500,000.00 $ $ 500,000.00 $ $ 500,000+00 4a 1 Lump Sum $ 346,000.00 $ 225.000.00 4b 1 LumpSum $ 277.000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 74,701,000.00 $ 78,488,144.00 $. 500,000.00 ....... ... `Add(+)or Delete(-) $ - p. (i. ) .f,!)4 '!= 3 '' ' `lil;!i I'I'1' $ 74,701,000.00 $ 79,488,144.00 $ J.R.FILANC ARCHER WESTERN H:\wp.dtakneYormMBId Do=B Pl-37 BM Summary 1 Of 1 9/5/01 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dale Tom.aDu. 10/9/01 10/29/O1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCOJfi 13(el Orange County Sanita6Dn District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sejal Patel, Engineer SUBJECT: SPACE ALLOCATION AND INTERIOR RENOVATION, JOB NO. J-84 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$551,500 for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, for a total project budget of$795,800; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services for the conceptual design (Phase 11)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, for an additional amount of$272,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $428,800. SUMMARY • The purpose of this project is to create a new, contemporary environment for employees, offering work group functionality and circulation, with common area improvements that reflect a changed culture and vision while resolving increasing needs for additional office space and parking. • In March 2001, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Board of Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to Fluor Signature Services (Fluor) for$156,800 to complete Phase I of the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-84. • Phase I, a "needs assessment" to define and outline the project for implementing interior renovation, incorporating the current spacing needs, and a vision to change the culture/environment, is now complete. Phase 11 will develop detailed conceptual design, and will cost $272,000. • The preliminary construction cost estimate (based on the Phase I report) is$6.1 M—6.9M excluding the cost of new furniture. This estimate includes design and construction of a new building for Information Technology(IT), a fitness and dining area, renovation of the existing Administration Building, and overall site improvements including parking, site and landscaping and common area modifications. • Based on Fluor's excellent performance and qualifications for Phase I of Job No. J-84, Staff recommended negotiating with Fluor for Phase II of this project. • The Board authorized the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 1 with Fluor for Phase 11 on August 22, 2001. • Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff spent considerable time developing a detailed Scope of Work, and negotiating the fee with Fluor Signature Services (Fluor)to ensure that all District needs and concerns relating to Space Allocation and Interior Renovation throughout the facility will be met on this project. • Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 in the amount of$272,000, for conceptual design of the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$18,800 for Project Development, $20,000 for Studies (Permitting) $200,700 for Design Staff, and $272,000 for Consultant PSA is being requested as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A comprehensive project budget does not exist for this project. Due to project uncertainties, the Executive Management Team (EMT) decided to budget one phase at a time. At this time, based on the $6.1 M - $6.9M estimate for improvements developed in Phase I, the total project cost estimate would be between $7.1 M - $7.9M. Staff is requesting a budget increase in the amount of$551,500, from the District's Capital Improvements Reserve Funds. This increase includes $272,000 for Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA), $18,800 for Project Development, $20,000 for Studies, $200,700 for Design staff, and $40,000 for Contingency, as shown on the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In March 2001, Fluor was awarded a PSA for Phase I to conduct a needs assessment. Phase 1 is the first phase of a three-phase project, and is complete. In Phase 11, the Consultant will utilize the Phase I document as a guideline to develop the detailed conceptual design concepts for: • Renovation (including the necessary demolition and enclosure) of the existing Administration Building • Exterior architecture for building structures, campus type setting, and outdoor offices • A new building for Information Technology(IT), dining area, and fitness area in concert with overall site development • Interior architecture for materials, finishes, and color scheme; modification of interior decoration such as carpeting and lighting scheme Page 2 • Inventory and evaluation of the existing furniture in the Administration Building to determine how to integrate the existing furniture with new to set up mock-up for Staff evaluation, and to establish the cost of new furniture • Detailed program for interior space utilization, functionality, and furniture development and work process (i.e. block diagram of system furniture layout) • Site improvement analysis including soil conditions, underground utilities, landscape modifications, etc. • Overall site development(parking expansion/renovation, improved landscaping, better circulation) • Preliminary city code compliance check for site development • Visual representation (22"X36") including floor plan, elevation views, and three- dimensional rendering • Preliminary cost analysis for design and construction based for the conceptual design Phase 111, if approved, will prepare plans and specifications for construction. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Orange County Sanitation District (District) could consider issuing a Request for Proposal for design services to prospective firms. This option would likely result in the selection of Fluor Signature Services (Fluor)as the top-rated firth. 2. Do not proceed with the project. The consequences are on-going problems relating to space and parking needs. CEOA FINDINGS Phase II of Job No. J-84, Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, is exempt from CEQA (Section 15306, Class 6). ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Consultant's Proposal— Phase II of Job No. J-84, dated September 24, 2001 SP,.jak:jo GAwp.dta\agenda\Baard Agenda Reparts=01 Board Agenda Rep"\1001\13.e.J-8 A. n�., �, Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SPACE ALLOCATION & INTERIOR RENOVATION JOB NO. J•84 (Phases I & II) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 18800 $ 22.000 $ 3,200 $ 18,800 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 100% Studies/Pemitfing $ 20.000 $ 20,000 20.000 $ 20,000 Desi nStaft $ 37,300 $ 37.300 $ 200,700 $ 238,000 $ 37,300 $ 200,700 $ 238,000 $ 37.300 16% Consultant PSA $ 156.800 $ 156,800 $ 272,000 $ 428.800 $ 156,800 $ 272,000 $ 428.800 $ 156.800 37% ii Construction Contract Construction Administration Constmclion Ins clion i Contingency $ 47,000 $ 47,000 $ 40,000 $ 87,000 TOTAL $ 244,300 $ 244.300 $ 551,500 $ 795,800 ` $ 197.300 $ 511.500 $ 708,800 $ 216.100 30% G?nlglobalNSpm Mimatlon and Inlenor Ren tlonk[J 4,I&II Budpel Table.xb]Distncla Professional Services Agreement Status Report Space Allocation and Interior Renovation Job No. J-84 Total Project Budget: $244,300 (original approved) Consultant: Fluor Signature Services Start Date of Project: March 26, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 3/1/01 Original PSA Phase I — Needs Assessment, to define $156,800 $156,800 (Phase I) and outline the project for implementing interior renovation, incorporating the current spacing needs, and a vision to change the culture/environment at Plant No. 1. Pending Addendum 1 Phase II — Conceptual Design for site $272,000 $428,800 (Phase 11) improvements, architectural concepts, interior renovation, and space utilization. C.TiletlelW IPud3 PSA Slalus Report Add.kt Fluor dm PDC COMMITTEE Meeunaoete TOBd.Gr Dlr. IQ/ 04/oi 10/24/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-67 131n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Project Manager SUBJECT: SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT, JOB NO. J-71-7 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$350,000 for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, for a total project budget of$2,732,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. SUMMARY Background • The Air Quality and Special Projects Division has been testing various manufacturers' equipment for scrubber monitoring and controlling since 1996. • During the initial test period,the Vapex, Inc. Sentinel was the only successful equipment that met the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSO) requirements for automation of scrubber chemical feeding. • In 1997, the Air Quality and Special Projects Division purchased 16 Vapex, Inc. Sentinels and implemented a large-scale test at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. • After four years of testing, Staff has determined that this equipment can be used to optimize odor reduction and chemical usage, and OCSD should permanently install a Vapex, Inc. Sentinel on each of the 27 scrubbers for monitoring and controlling emissions. • During the design phase of this project, Staff decided to monitor the scrubbers with the existing treatment plant control system, but utilize local controllers to expedite the construction schedule. • This required nine additional field control panels estimated at an installed cost of$38,900 each, totaling $350,000. • The anticipated award of a construction contract is December 2001. The construction period is 4-1/2 months. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No authorization of expenditures is being requested. The attached Budget Information Table shows a proposed Construction Contract budget increase of$350,000, for a total revised budget of$2,732,000. G Np. Wa WdaVmJRgnNftp V001a MAp WpWV001110AJ 71.7O w .w: MGM Pagel BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Under"Proposed Budget Increase,"an additional $350,000 is being requested to adjust the budget for the final Engineers Construction Estimate for Job No. J-71-7, to a total of $1,818.000. The Construction Contract increase is being requested to include the additional construction items. The proposed total budget would increase to$2,732,000. The proposed source of funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD) Capital Improvement Reserves. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The scrubber emissions monitoring program began in 1996. Operations and Maintenance (O&M)solicited interested vendors to demonstrate a monitoring system that could continuously measure Hydrogen Suede (H2S)scrubber emissions and control scrubber chemical additions. Vendor testing was conducted for six months. The Vapex system was the only monitor available that met all criteria for performance, accuracy, and reliability. O&M staff unanimously agreed to proceed with design and installation of temporary Vapex monitors. At the time, it was decided that 16 Vapex units were required for a large-scale test, including one spare. In FY1997/98, O&M budgeted a project to purchase and install the 16 Vapex units. O&M elected to manage the project and selected CH2M Hill, Inc. to perform the project design. O&M also elected to temporarily install the units during the design period. By the end of the fiscal year, O&M completed the temporary installations and the design for the permanent installation. In FY1998/g9, the construction documents for the Vapex installations were turned over to the Engineering Department for implementation. The Engineering Department reviewed the construction documents, and put the project on hold after determining that the Plans and Specifications did not meet the soon to be released Engineering Design Guidelines. Also, during that review period, the District experienced a substantial number of odor complaints at Plant No. 2. Most of the complaints were the result of bleach carryover from the scrubbers. To resolve the odor issue, O&M investigated options to optimize the bleach chemical feed. In the first quarter of FY2000/01, O&M tested several chlorine residual monitors against the established criteria for performance, accuracy, and reliability. ATI and Vapex, Inc. units were purchased and temporarily installed at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The Vapex, Inc. chlorine sensor was the only successful piece of equipment. Concurrently, information from the Odor Control Master Plan project, Job No. J-714, revised the proposed scrubber operational and control strategies to avoid off-site impacts. The revised operational strategy, and the Scope of Work for Job No. J-71-7 is to have Vapex, Inc. gas monitors installed on all scrubbers and use the OCSD Engineering Design Guidelines for the design. Gtq.N�pmm�eve K«m Pwu lB Ap PryTg1NIM unaAa n..�w: aaoree Page 2 Y Cost-Benefit Analysis The estimated financial benefit of this project includes reductions in Staff time and chemical costs. These are estimated at$377,000 per year. The estimated payback period for the $2,732,000 project is 7.2 years. Other project benefits include more accurate compliance with AQMD monitoring requirements and a reduction in the number of odor complaints from surrounding neighbors. Conclusion The project as currently proposed has a payback of 7.2 years. The project will also allow the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)to implement automation goals, reduce chemical usage, reduce staffing effort, and reduce odor complaints. Thus, the project is favorable to the continued economical operation of OCSD's treatment facilities, and is recommended by Staff for Implementation. ALTERNATIVES Cancel the project and proceed with the long-tens odor control project, Job No. J-71-8. However, this project is an interim project to control scrubber emissions until the larger Job No. J-71-8 can rehabilitate the entire scrubber system. This would cause additional odor complaints by the neighbors over the next five years while Job No. J-71-8 is being designed and built. Staff does not recommend this alternative. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table JB:jo:jak G\ Ale\apendep WApenda Repfte 01 BmW Apends ReWft100111UJ-71-7.d= G\xp.dLLp.n". WA,nNRepaLL=lB MApnnde R.n IIOJI\I U71'7.d. Re-.i..d: erJmm Page 3 16735 Von Karmen.Suite 200 Inure.CA 92606 Tel (949)6604070 y Fox.(949)474.0940 August 21, 2001 1 � Chuck Hodge Orange County Sanitation District Eminarm 1W Engineering&CnnsW.g 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 17141-036.5 Subject: P1-37 Revised Construction Cost Estimate Dear Chuck, We have reviewed our construction cost estimate per the District's request. Our revised estimate is attached. The revised estimate is $72,487,445. The difference between our revised estimate and our previous 100% design submittal estimate ($60,390,816) can be attributed to the following main areas: • Incorrect labor rates were used in the 100% estimate which did not accurately reflect current Orange County labor rates (approximately$7 million) • The complexity of the electrical/instrumentation portion of the contract was not adequately accounted for(approximately$4.7 milliom) • Payment bond was not included in the 100% estimate ($708,000) • Earthquake and Builders Risk Insurance were added by addendum and were not included in the 1000/estimate(about$500,000) If you have any questions or would like to discuss the estimate please call. Very truly yours, BROWN AND CALDWELL Colin Ferguson Principal Engineer CF:te PA \pbs\17141\—ran In--da 102274 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT JOB NO. J-71-7 PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURI(EW PROPOSED FUNDS - THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/TASk�' AUTHORIZED PRWECT� - IIE0I§ED 'AUTHORIZED -AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDI IEE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET'.. INCREASE/ ,.. BUDGET TO DATE(') REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE To DATE(%) DECREASE Project Development $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,622 92% Studies/Permitting $ 101,000 $ 101.0001 $ 101,000 1 $ 101,0001 $ 101,000 1 $ 44,477 44% Consultant PSA $ 360.000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 359.951 $ 359,951 $ 0% Design Staff $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 7,029 21% Construction Contract $ 1,468.000 $ 1,468,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,818,000 $ 1,042,575 $ 1,042,575 $ 138,799 13% Construction Administration $ 119,000 $ 119,000 $ 119.000 It 119,000 $ 119,000 It 78 0% Construction Inspection $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ 41.000 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 254,000 $ 254.000 $ 254,000 $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 2,382,000 $ 2,382.000 1 $ 350,000 $ 2.732,000 1 $ 1,702,1,26 $ - $ 1,702,526 $ 195.005 11% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - $ $ - $ 0% PROJECT NET $ 2,382,000 1 $ 2,382,000 1 $ 350.000 1$ 2,732,000 $ 1.702.526 $ - $ 1.702,526 $ 195,005 11% (•) Most of the funds authorized to date were done under Job No. SP-04. Job No. J-71-7 replaced SP-04. h:4xp.dla�n99ermetbud0elww- Fprm ReNsen Oel.4,2000 PDC COMMITTEE M=te To Bd.of Dir. AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDO01-68 13(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE, JOB NO. J-40-8 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a new budget of$440,000 for Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8,from the Orange County Sanitation District's Capital Reserves; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Sole Source Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee to prepare an update to the 1999 Strategic Plan for a total not to exceed $350,000. SUMMARY • Since adoption of the Strategic Plan in 1999, significant developments have taken place that will impact the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)operations such as: bans on land application of class "B" biosolids, persistent beach warnings and closures, urban runoff diversions to sanitary sewers, final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System, and lower than projected wastewater flows. • These changes require that the District revisit the 1999 Strategic Plan to provide the Board of Directors, the public, and Staff with new information to help us make decisions about our Ocean Discharge Permit application in 2002. • Staff proposes developing a short term Strategic Plan update starting in November 2001, and finishing in April 2002. The update will develop two alternative Capital Improvement Programs (CIP), one for full secondary treatment with disinfection, and one for a blended discharge of 50% primary effluent and 50% secondary effluent also with and without disinfection. • This short term Strategic Plan update would be supported by three workshops with the citizen advisory groups formed during the 1999 Strategic Planning process, the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) and Rate Advisory Committee (RAC). • In addition to producing the two CIP alternatives,the Strategic Plan Update would identify required rates and fees for residential, commercial, and industrial users for each of the two alternatives. • Due to the short timeframe available to perform the update, and to keep continuity with the Strategic Plan, Staff proposes a Sole Source Contract with Camp Dresser and McKee,who will be teaming with Carollo Engineers. These two firms combined experience with past District Master Plans makes them uniquely qualified to perform the required update in a short period of time. • The recommended Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is estimated to have a fee not to exceed $350,000. As of this date, a final scope and fee have not been negotiated. In order to move this effort forward to meet our anticipated schedule for completing the Ocean Discharge Permit application and the FY2002103 budget cycle, Staff is seeking authorization to execute a PSA in a forth approved by the Purchasing Manager. 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY At this time, authorization of$350,000 in Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA), and $80,000 in Design Staff Costs are being requested. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This hem has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Authorization to create a new project budget in the amount of$440,000 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed short-term Strategic Plan Update will develop updated Capital Improvement Program (CIP) information, and will provide projected operational costs and fees for our various user categories. The short-term update needs to be completed by April 2002. to be useful in decision making for our Ocean Discharge Permit(NPDES Permit)application. It is Staffs intention to follow the short-term update with another, more comprehensive Strategic Plan update that would address changes such as service area development and demographics, and the application of new technologies for secondary treatment allematives, odor control, disinfection and solids management. ALTERNATIVES Do not develop the update. Under this alternative, we would be forced to rely on the existing Strategic Plan analysis. Significant changes have occurred since 1999, these changes would not be available for consideration by the Board when it decides on our Ocean Discharge Permit application in 2002. CEQA FINDINGS The recommended action is for conducting planning-level engineering and financial studies, and does not require CEQA documentation. Should a decision be made to proceed with an alternative other than the certified 1999 Strategic Plan and the 1989 Master Plan preferred alternatives,further CEQA analysis may be required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report AA:jo:jak G:lxp.dblagendaiaoard Agenda Reporls=l 9oard Agenda Reports11001113.g.CDM.dec 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE JOB NO. J-40-8 . - ORIGINAL-t CURRENT PROPOSED: . PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECAYASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET';. REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION. TOTAL EXPEROITUAE EXPENDED. BUDGET`' :BUDGET INCRE%CSE" BUDGET TO`DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO HATE "TO DAT€(% Project Development StuoieslPermbti Consultant PSA $ 350000 $ 350.000 1 1 $ 350.000 $ 350,000 Design Staff $ 80000 $ 80.000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Construction Contract $ $ Construction Administration $ $ Constructbn Inspection $ $ Contingency $ 10,0001 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 440,000 $ 440. 00 $ 440,000 $ 440.000 Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 1 $ 440,000 $ 440.000 1 1$ 440,000 $ 440,000 C:%FileNelWIRIJA"Bud el Tads.tl 10'WN Professional Services Agreement Status Report Strategic Plan Update Job No. J-40.8 Total Project Budget: $440,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. Start Date of Project: October 24, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Strategic Plan Update - Treatment, Reuse and $350,000 PSA Disposal Plan C:~etW IPU-4M PSA SWWS Repod.doc 09/21/01 Revised MlC PDC COMMITTEE NteethlpDate T0Vj:jfDir. 10/4/01 10/24/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number p0N1-69 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Hams, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: CENTRAL GENERATION AUTOMATION, JOB NO. J-79 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the approved sole source equipment purchase with Hatch & Kirk Inc. for an additional amount of$9,400 for a total amount not to exceed $122,260, in connection with Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79. SUMMARY • In August 2001, the Board of Directors awarded a sole source agreement to Hatch & Kirk Inc. for the purchase and installation of speed control equipment for the Central Generation Engines at Plant No. 2, for an amount not to exceed $112,860. • During the procurement process, Hatch & Kirk Inc. noticed an error in their proposal related to insufficient labor hours required for the equipment installation, and neglected freight and sales tax costs and requested an additional $14,440. • Upon discussion with the PDC Committee on October 4, the Committee directed Staff to renegotiate the additional costs requested by Hatch & Kirk Inc. The supplier has agreed to reduce their cost by$5,040, for a revised amount of$122,260. See attached letter. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Rem has been budgeted. (Line item: section e, page 95) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Ww"auny nuagm�agmm Reg 51 1eow Iq•ga RagWugoIMAJ 79g ReNud. WOO Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Not to purchase this equipment at this time, but to bid with the J-79 project. There would be no substantial savings to this alternative and a loss of approximately 12 months of operational costs. CEOA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Revised Hatch & Kirk Inc. proposal JRH:jo vmeaun.meuvyewmem�ynm wwmuaw m.a apme wwaooian s�e.am Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Central Generation Automation JOB NO. J-79 ORIGINAL CURRENT 'PROPOSED PROPOSED • FUNDS �N64 PROPOSED ESTIMATED ES]IMA � PROJECT?ASk+ AUTHORIZED PROJECT 13UDGET REVISED. AUTHORIZED AUTHoa4ATI0N TOTAL �E%PENDRVRE ESIPE DE . EUDGET BUDGET INCREASE eUURET': TO DATE ttg1IEST AUTHORIZATION - TO DATE 70IPA�TE '7 Pm'ect Development $ 80.000 $ 80.000 $ 80,000 $ 80.000 $ 80,000 $ 17,000 21% StudieslPermitlim $ 61,000 $ 51.000 $ 51.000 $ 51,000 $ 51.000 $ 16.000 31% Consultanl PSA $ 253,000 $ 253,000 $ 253.000 Design Staff $ 83.000 $ 83.000 $ 83,000 $ 83.000 $ 83,000 Construction Con"d $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1.5 .000 $ 122.260 $ 122.260 Construction Adminisvatlan $ 153.000 $ 153.000 $ 153.000 COMIMCUM Ins c8wn $ 160.000 $ 160,000 $ 160.000 ConUngency $ 694,000 $ 684,000 $ 684.000 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 2,964,0001 $ 2,964,OOo 1 1 $ 2,964,000 1 1$ 214,000 $ 122,260 $ 336.260 1 $ 33,000 10% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 2.964,000 1 $ 2,964.000 1 1 $ 2,964,000 11 $ 214,000 $ 122,260 1 $ 336,260 1 $ 33,000 1 10% cvrwnviry�-reaas.iTade.miwsem Oct-10-01 00:34m Fraa-OCSO PURCHASING 7149650728 T-464 P 0',/01 F-435 MAD kx■ ENGINEERED SYSTCMS DIVISION Tuesday,Ootob"9, 2001 Orrrius Own Orange County Prucumment 10844 Ellis Ave, Fouatain Valley,CA 92709 Dear Mr. Ohaai, Par our conversation this meaning, we value the relationship with Orange County Sanitation, which we both have wonted had to develop ova may years,therefore we submit the following revised proposal. Hatch&Kirk Reginea nd Systems is pleased to provide the following Updated quotation Tor your review. The quac is to upgrade your existmF Woodward 701 gavemur commit system with Woodward's latest 723plus /DSI.0 controls. We understand Orange County had received board approval to move forward with this purchase based o r our carlim proposal.We arc prepared to move forward upon your acceptance of the proposal as presented below. This proposal includes all freight,materials,engiocam&estimated taxes and installation.We will utliza Ricluml Fleig as our Senior fingirsca,he will be suppu lcd by Jim Wimp,also of Hatch&Kirk Inc. 723 Digital Spcod Comral&DS1.0\MS4.0 Pmjcct - — E122,259.83 Material delivery is estimated m 8 wec4s. Estimated installation is an additional 8 woeks. Prices quoted am valid for 90 days per your request nod ore preaen ed assuming the units to be completed concurrent of each other. If Ihem.Ohould be a delay of work in progres, additional travel and labor expenses will be applied,consisted to the published rstes of Hatch&Kirk Engineered Systems Division. We appreciate the confidence that Orange Countylms had in Hatch &Kirk in the past and look forward to completing this latest upgrade. X,L BestRrM.Device Hatch&Kirk Inc. Engineered Systems Division Cc: Chris Klein-HK American Canyon Richard Milt-HK Norwalk Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING_ Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, October 10,2001, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 10,2001 at 5:00 p.m., in the Dlstdcrs Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Tom Nixon, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Steve Filarsky Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Don Hughes Shawn Boyd Sheila Forsberg, Johnson &Associates John M. Gullixson Doug Korthoff Roy Moore Joey Racano Joy L. Neugebauer Toms Sins Jerry Sigler James W. Silva STAFF PRESENT: Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General Manager Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS The following people spoke about ocean discharge Issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver: Doug Korthoff,Joey Racano, Toms Sins. (4) RECEIVE.FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the September 19,2001 Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 October 10,2001 ' (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported a workshop was scheduled for November 3' , 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. to discuss ocean discharge issues. The District plans to have 4-5 public workshops through December 2002. These workshops will cover the various studies, technical issues related to level of treatment,financial issues, and regulatory framework. An application for ocean discharge permit must be submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)by December 2002. He strongly urged the Directors to attend the workshop,which will be held in the District Boardroom. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed, Director of Finance, referred the Directors to the Treasurer's Report. He reported on one of the investments in the long-term portfolio, a United Airlines $1.6 million equipment bond. United Airline's credit rating has been downgraded since the purchase. Although the District would not purchase this today, staff and PIMCO recommend that the District hold the investment. This action is allowed by the investment policy. Mr. Stread has also been receiving inquiries from reporters on the District's financial situation,to include the amount of money held in cash and investments and future rates. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources, Lisa Tomko, updated the Directors on the CAL OSHA investigation due to a complaint. The inspector is reviewing information provided by District's staff, and has requested additional information. 19) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported requests had been coming from the media and the new area of focus was on finances and reserves. There have been a couple of good letters to the editor in the paper recently. People are beginning to speak in support of the need to look at all of the facts and to look at the science before a decision is made on the level of treatment for ocean discharge. An editorial was in the LA Times and staff is working on a letter to the editor to correct the information. Ms. Murphy reminded the Directors that a Groundwater Replenishment System Workshop will be held on Saturday, November 17' , at the Orange County Water District from 8 a.m. — 11 a.m. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 October 10, 2001 (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Nixon reported a resolution for updating the District's Rules of Procedures would be brought to the FAHR Committee and the Board in November. (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. FAHR01-61: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2001. b. FAHR01-62: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR01-63: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of September 27, 2001. d. FAHR01-64: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers Compensation Claims and Costs Report. e. FAHR01-65: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-_,amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a)through (a)under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR01-66: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Agreement to Establish the Purchase Price for, and the Purchase of, A 2.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Capacity Right for Desalter Brine with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, for a total amount of $5,252.015.26 . Gary Streed, Director of Finance,gave a brief update on the existing agreement with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA), and the need for the recommended additional agreement. Currently there are some Flaws with the 1996 agreement that need to be renegotiated with regard to purchase of additional capacity. Staff and SAWPA are attempting to resolve those Flaws. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. The motion was amended to authorize staff to continue to negotiate with SAWPA to resolve the Flaws in the 1996 agreement Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 October 10, 2001 b. FAHROI-67 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project with the Orange County Water District, in a form approved by General Counsel. Blake Anderson reported on a proposed revised agreement with the Orange County Water District for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW R). He reviewed the basic components of the existing agreement and the proposed changes within the proposed agreement. Some details were still being worked out and he reviewed those issues OCSD was concerned with. The agreement would be coming before the full board for approval in November. Mr. Anderson also discussed the termination clauses that would be included. Following discussion with the Directors it was requested that section 67.3 of the agreement be modified to include a right of first refusal to be granted to OCSD. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the report as information only. (13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR01-68 Compensation and Classification Study Update Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, introduced Sheila Forsberg of Johnson & Associates,who gave an updated report on the compensation and classification study. The classification component is almost complete,with a workshop scheduled in mid-October with the executive management team to review. Compensation surveys were still being received and evaluated. Both components of the study should be finalized by the first part of November and brought back to the FAHR Committee.in November for approval. (14) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 October 10, 2001 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for November 14, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:20 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). At 6:30 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Submitted by: U 11114 Penny M <yle FAHR Committee ecretary G:1„pmebpen W YAiIlKA!/IQOJ112 W 1 MFNef 1fOIW1 FAXR MIN tl% FAHR COMMITTEE Mwdng Date To ad.or Do-. 10/NO, 10/24/01 v AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number FAHROI-61 m c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of September 2001. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (tine item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) GARr diaage"eaowld Aee"da Rep s¢001.10 ncmde RIW11IM1114.edda Revised'. WOO B Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts September 30.2001 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $ 6,812,174 4.5 Union Bank Checking Account 341,365 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,694,000 3.0 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 42,486.194 4.9 PIMCO-Lang-term Portfolio 365,649.144 5.2 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,818 4.4 Debt Service Reserves w/rrustees 35,225,839 5.0 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL 2452 215 534 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report WIC c:�w.aaagema bAgenda Reow 001 ew,d Agada RepmkI0u14.c dm Ream. erz 8 Page 2 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ���������� AMEN ..... ..... ..... MONTHLY REPORT - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 September 2001) Liquid Operating Menlo(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $43,063,000 • Mellon $43,076,512 Historical Cost: • PIMCO S43,086,517 • Mellon $43,118,444 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.30 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact intIon)of 1%Champ: $129,189 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 52% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.50 0.29 3 Months: 126 0.91 12 Months: 6.08 5.05 Year-to-Date: 421 3.42 Commentary Inmrtst mas ad..shone d of the yield curve decreased during the month(3m nth T-Bills do wn 100 basis points to 2.36%),however longer maturities inceenssd(30•year Treasuries up 5 basis point to 5.42%). The Liquld pomolio outperformed the benchmark by 21 bash points for the uncouth,uW by 79 buts points year-to-date. PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as oommercial paper and short-hmm notes,enhanced retums. G:IyEnNnliMxFINVImmyA¢mNJamapSpa/.RPi.M MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING At REPORTING (for the month ended 30 September 2001) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $368,719,666 • Mellon $368,499,229 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $356,240,412 Mellon $356,219,874 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.11 Of Index: 2.37 15.1.3 1 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,779,985 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 28% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: .AA-V" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes' 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1.08 1.80 1 Month: 4.17 3 Months: 3.20 3.20 11.93 .17 12 Months: Year-to-Date: 7.09 8.59 • Three-month yields decreased for the month(90-0ay T-Bills down 100 basis points to 2.36%)an did the longer mWrincs(5-yes Teeasury Name down 58 basis points l03.80%). • The Lang-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 72 basis point far ds month,and lagged the benchmark by 150 beis points yea-m dwte. • PIMCO's below index duration was negative for performance a yields fell aaass most assemblies. • A broader-then-indar maturity mix with at emphasis on shun-maherity issue had a positive Impact on performance • An and mmight allocation in Treasuries strongly detracted from remms as,the Tmaury swtor rallied strongly during tice month. • Holdings of mortgage-banked securities deaacted from performance an this sector undaperfmmed Treaurie. An underweight allocation m the corporate water added to reams a the corporate sector posted negerive man=during the month. •The District is holding 1,600,000 par of United Airline Pas-Through 2001-IC,6.831%coupon,9/V2008 maturity,representing 0.4%of the por as olio. The security w purchased on 8/102001 and was subsequently downgraded by Moody s from A3 to BAI an 9118101 and S&P from A-fo BBB on 920/01. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating ofA3 by Moody's or A.by S&P at the time of pasleese. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSFV7511102 30SEP-2001 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,083,584.42 2,093,584.42 4.84% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 3,098,633.60 3,098,633.60 7.19% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 4,199,004.83 4,199,004.93 9.75% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 1,689,880.42 1,689,880.42 3.92% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 6,558,468.74 6,558,469.74 15.23% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 17,629,572.01 17,629,572.01 40.93% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS XI 17,629,572.01 1% -fib FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 2,460,093.75 2,465,256.00 5,72% 5,162.25 U.S.AGENCIES 9,560,024.32 9,537,324.52 22.14% -22,699.80 BANKING It FINANCE 10,396,359.60 10,391,996.99 24.10% -14.362.61 INDUSTRIAL 1,460,226.70 1,457,234.35 3.39% -2,992.35 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,021,850.00 1,014,810.00 2.36% -7,040.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 24,999,554.37 24,856,621.96 57.70% 41,932.51 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 24, .3 24.SK62IJ3 5370% OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 590,317.96 590,517.96 1.37% 0.00 TOTAL 590,317.96 590,317.96 1.37% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 590 17. 907FTe NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 43,118,44434 43,076,511.83 100.00% -41,932.51 09-Oc62001 11:12:08 Executive Workbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-SEP-2001 FINAL LONG TEWOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 72,648.25 72,648.25 0.02% 0.00 PAYABLES -40,512,375.00 40,512,375.OD -10.99% 0.00 TOTAL 40,439,726.75 40,439,726.75 -10.97% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,092,308.17 2,092,308.17 0.57% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 43,499,483.48 43,499,483.49 11.800/6 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 45,591,791.65 45,591,791.65 12.37% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 5115210ST.9 64..90 1.40% FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 23,311,740.34 24,603,541.11 6.68% 1,291,800.77 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,429,480.96 33,019,783.97 8.96% 3,589,303.01 U.S.AGENCIES 119,200,444.46 124,533,302.48 33.79% 5,332,858.02 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 36,115,347.58 36,567,898.93 9.92% 452,551.35 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 9,677,512.14 9,842,122.58 2.67% 164,610.44 FHLMC POOLS 5,849,987.52 5,846,906.71 1.59% -3,090.81 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,249,567.45 4,369,898.64 1.19% 120,331.19 FNMA POOLS 9,843,750.00 9,%4,062.50 2.70% 120,312.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 4,600,000.00 4,494,656.00 1.22% -105,344.00 BANKING&FINANCE 44,983,753.72 45,528,721.62 12.36% 544,967.90 INDUSTRIAL 31,536,875.00 31,821,305.00 8.64% 284,430.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,956,655.00 4.06% 334,645.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,309,125.00 1.98% 9,125.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,640,100.00 2.07% 142,845.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 348,217,72417 360,497,079.54 97.83% - IZ279,355.37 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ,21 Tff4.1E 360,497,079.54 97.93% 12,279,35537 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 09-Oct-2001 11:13:53 Executive Wmkbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 3"EP-2001 FINAL LONG TERM OPP.R-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,850,084.65 2,850,084.65 0.77% 0.00 TOTAL 2,850,084.65 2,850,D84.65 0.77% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 50,084.65 2,850,08/.6S 0.77% Ub6 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 356,219,873.72 368,499,229.09 100.00% 12,279,3SS37 09-0ca2001 11:13:53 Executive Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 2001/09/30 RUN DATE 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE ERNEST VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 6,558,468.74 VREYFVS TREASURY CASH WHY .000 3.252 AAA 100.000 6,558,468.74 37.20 9960BS247 AAA 6,558,468.74 15.44 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MOO ASSN DISCOUNT 3.306 .000 P-1 90.294 2,162,462.50 12.26 313509UG6 RAT 03/15/2002 A-1+ 2,162,462.50 5.09 200,000.00 SECTOR DICKINSON DISC 3.336 .000 P-1 98.314 196,620.89 1.11 0]5888CB) 03/11/2002 196,620.81 .46 1,900,000.00 FEDERAL HATE HIS; ASSN DISC EYE 3.390 .000 P-1 99.410 1,888,094.75 10.21 313589MS MAT 10/25/2001 A-1+ 1,880,794.75 4.45 100,000.00 FEDERAL FRAN CA BK CONS SYSTEM 3.418 .000 P-1 99.462 99,461.63 .56 313313NTI HAT 11/02/2001 A-1+ 99,461.67 .23 500,000.00 FBDBRAL EONS LH BR CONS DISC N 3.425 .000 P-1 99.163 496,316.67 2.01 313385NY8 HAT 11/07/2001 A-1+ 496,316.67 1.12 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 3.482 .000 P-1 99.643 896,790.25 5.09 63743CKC2 10/12/2001 896,790.25 2.11 100,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN HIS CORP DISC 3.494 .000 P-1 99.316 99,315.64 .56 313397PRO MAT 11/16/2001 A-1+ 99,315.64 .23 900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN HE CONE DISC N 3.505 .000 P-1 99.583 896,240.25 5.08 313385ND4 MAT 10/19/2001 A-1+ 896,248.25 2.11 173,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN NTG CORP DISC 3.543 .000 P-1 98.735 170,880.75 .96 3133970KO HAT 12/12/2001 A-1+ 170,000.75 .40 300,000.00 FEDERAL H0NE LN BR CONS DISC N 3.522 .000 P-1 99.105 297,315.50 1.68 313385NJ1 HAT 10/24/2001 A-1+ 297,315.50 .70 150,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MW ASSN DISCOUNT 3.635 .000 P-1 98.498 147,740.58 .93 313589QMB HAT A-1+ 147,747.58 .35 1,000,000.00 HECTOR DICKINSON DISC 3.686 .000 P-1 99.012 990,165.28 5.61 0I508RAR3 10/17/2001 990,165:28 2.33 2,600,000.00 FEDERAL R0SE LN NTG CORP DISC 3.205 .000 P-1 98.340 2,556,040.00 14.50 313390M9 NET 12/28/2001 A-1+ 2,556,840.00 6.02 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSF07511102 2001/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 21.13.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY NARKCT TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MANET VALUE 8 TOTAL 175,000.00 FEDERAL ROW LN NTH CORP DISC 3.021 .000 P-1 98.363 172,135.54 .92 313390QM6 NAT 12/14/2001 A-1. 172,135.54 .41 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASE 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1.613 1.016 17,629,572.01 100.00 17,629,572.01 41.50 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 250,000.00 GENERAL HIRE RUN 4TR 00555 .000 3.906 A2 99.923 249,260.00 1.00 37042MSCS FLTG AT O1/28/2002 OD 01/26/00 A 249,932.50 .59 1,800,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN HEN .000 2.923 AAA 100.030 1,000,281.25 7.24 86380SAR2 FITS AT 11/13/2001 DD 11/13/00 AAA 1,800,540.00 4.24 2DO,000.00 NAL MART SWANS INC HT 3.159 6.655 AA2 103.309 206,194.00 .03 931142BG3 6.875% 08/01/20D2 UP 08/01/00 AA 206,610.00 .49 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFRIN JEWETT 3.162 5.001 Al 101.270 147,009.70 .59 250661AE1 5.805% 04/01/2002 DO 03/23/99 A- 146,853.10 .35 115,000.00 DAIRLERCERYSLER NA ELDG CORP 3.503 0.040 A3 101.213 116,769.05 .46 233935AF4 2.125% 03/01/2002 DD 03/15/OD A- 116,394.95 .22 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOW LN BK CONS BUS 3.638 4.453 AAA 101.045 502,690.00 2.03 3133ME6R0 4.500% 04/04/2002 DD 04/04/01 AAA 505,225.D0 1.19 100,D00.00 FEDERAL EOM¢ IN BK CONS BUN 3.692 5.665 AAA 100.625 100,681.00 .40 3133NBMY6 5.700% 12/14/2001 DO 06/14/99 AAA 100,625.DO .24 70,000.00 FEDERAL SURE IN BE CONS BDS 3.304 6.00O AAA 100.828 70,595.70 .20 3133N94R0 6.050% 12/28/2001 DO 06/28/99 AAA 70,579.60 .13 40,000.00 FEDERAL HOW LN BANK CONS BUD 3.723 6.124 AAA 100.500 40,267.20 .16 313394EA1 6.155% 11/21/2001 DD 11/21/96 AAA 40,200.00 .09 180,000.00 FEDERAL NO= LN BK CONS BUS 3.081 .000 AAA 99.172 177,300.00 .01 3133MSKN0 EEROCPN D1/17/2002 DO 09/04/98 AAA 178,509.60 .42 1,100,000.00 FIRST UN COST SHE NT 3.001 7.865 A2 103.302 1,139,714.00 4.57 337358AM3 8.125% 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/92 A- 1,136,322.00 2.63 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 MSM7511102 2001/09/30 RUN DATE , 10/04/01 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT NODDY BARNEY TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE BARNEY VALUE B TOTAL 605,000.00 CIT GROUP NLDGS INC 3.006 6.236 A2 102.231 619,520.00 2.48 125569DP5 6.375% 08/01/2002 DO 07/28/97 A+ 618,497.55 1.46 200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIG ASSN MIN 3.BD9 6.055 AAA 103.047 204,6DB.D0 .82 31364C3W6 6.240% 07/29/2DO2 DD 07/29/97 AAA 206,094.DO .49 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB MTN 1 M00405 3.853 5.620 A2 102.313 610,960.00 2.46 073928SW4 5.750% 08/12/2DO2 DO 02/12/01 A 613,879.00 1.44 175,000.00 FEDBRAL BONN LN BE CONS RUN 3.958 4.069 AAA 100.280 175,109.38 .70 3133MFAB1 4.080E 06/06/2002 DO 06/06/01 AAA 175,490.00 .41 135,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 3.972 6.224 AA3 202.433 138,079.35 .55 617446000 6.375% 08/01/2002 DO 07/29/97 AA- 138,284.55 .33 150,000.00 FEDERAL SORE LN BE CONS BON 4.022 4.167 AAA 100.310 150,140.63 .60 3133MFBK3 4.180E 06/07/2002 DO 06/07/01 AAA 150,465.00 .35 300,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE SOME LEE MTN 4.050 6.900 A3 100.000 301,980.00 1.20 22237LJY1 6.900% 10/02/2001 DD 10/02/00 A- 300,000.00 .71 100,000.00 FEDERAL SONY IN BY CONS BOB 4.146 4.561 AAA 100.690 100,496.00 .40 3133M74G8 4.995E 01108/20D2 DO 01/08/99 AAA 200,690.00 .24 1,065,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO SUB NT 4.224 8.122 AA 103.117 1,105,587.15 4.41 949740BVS 8.335E 05/15/2002 DD 05/26/92 A 1,098,196.05 2.58 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LM AN CONE ADS 4.246 6.672 AAA 201.172 4,278,414.00 17.09 3133MAQJI 6.750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 4,249,224.00 10.00 20,000.00 FEDERAL KOM LN BK CONS BUS 4.273 5.783 AAA 102.375 20,272.60 .08 3133M93B6 5.920% 06/14/2002 DO 06/14/99 AAA 20,475.DO .05 500,000.OD BANK ONE CORP SUB 4.300 7.93E Al 102.125 514,200.00 2.05 06423AAA1 B.1U08 03/01/2002 DO 03/01/92 A- 510,625.00 1.20 85,000.00 FORD MIA CR CO HIS 4.319 6.425 A2 101.945 86,759.50 .34 345397R84 6.550% 09/10/2002 DO 09/10/97 A 06,653.25 .2D 1,200,000.00 GOLDEN BEST FINL CORD DEL SUB 4.332 0.142 A3 102.859 1,237,614.00 4.96 381317AF3 8.3758 04/15/2002 DO 04/30/92 A- 1,234,300.00 2.91 75,000.00 RARE ONE CORD NT 4.366 6.259 RAI 102.251 76,443.75 .30 06423AAC7 6.40UB 00/02/2002 DO 07/22/59 A 76,688.25 .10 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07511102 2001/09/30 RUN DATE v 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RON TIM 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NODDY BASSET TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE BARRET VALUE % TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 200,000.00 FEDERAL SORE IN RR CONS ADS 4.371 6.242 AAA 100.201 201,878.00 .80 3133HIS34 6.260% 10/29/2001 DO 10/29/97 AAA 200,562.00 .47 100,000.00 FEDERAL BURS IN BR CONS BUS 4.376 3.085 AAA 100.562 101,525.00 .40 3133NBDU2 3.125% 11/15/2001 DD 05/11/00 AAA 100,562.00 .24 60,000.00 CHASE NANBATTAN COSP RAN SUB 4.389 8.336 Al 102.9I1 61,645.80 .24 16161ABE2 0.6258 05/01/2002 DO 05/01/92 A4 61,782.60 .15 51,000.00 MERIDIAN BANCORP INC SUB DEB 4.410 I.610 A2 103.374 52,596.30 .21 589580AB5 7.835% O7115/2002 DO 07/15/92 A- 52,720.74 .12 605,000.00 BANTAM RICA CORP SUB NT 4.424 8.198 AA3 102.159 697,018.50 2.17 06605OBQ7 8.375% 01/15/2002 A 689,573.25 1.62 1,000,000.00 TEXAS UTILS ELEC CO 1ST NTG 4.480 0.006 A3 101.481 1,021,850.00 4.08 882850BF6 8.125% 02/01/2002 BB84 1,O14,B1O.00 2.39 25D,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG AWN USES 4.665 6.547 AAA 1D1.183 253,742.50 1.01 31359BFF5 6.6251 01/15/2002 DO 1/14/2000 AAA 252,967.50 .60 247,D00.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BAN CONS DENS 4.670 5.153 AAA 100.906 248,044.81 1.00 31331LAF5 5.200% 02/01/20D2 DO 02/01/01 AAA 249,237.82 .59 1,015,000.00 NESTINGROUSE ELEC CORP NT 4.673 B.D91 A3 103.509 1,051,3D2.00 4.22 960402AP0 8.335% 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/92 A- 1,050,616.35 2.47 125,000.00 PED KOME LN BIG CORP DEB 4.676 I.710 AAA 100.516 127,200.75 .50 313400HV1 0.350% 11/07/2001 DO 11/07/91 AAA 125,645.00 .30 2,400,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTES 4.339 6.450 AAA 102.719 2,460,D93.05 9.91 9128216E7 06.625% 05/31/2002 DO 05/31/DO AAA 2,465,256.00 5.80 2DO,DOO.00 FEDERAL NATL BIG ASSN DEB 4.840 7.369 AAA 101.781 204,660.00 .81 313586337 3.500% 02/11/20D2 DO 2/10/92 AAA 203,562.00 .48 150,000.00 FEDERAL SONS IN BE CONS BOB 4.840 6.882 AAA 101.719 152,959.50 .61 3133HATE9 78 02/25/2002 DO 02/25/2000 AAA 152,578.50 .36 150,000.00 FEDERAL NATL BIG ASSN HIS 4.040 6.206 AAA 101.359 151,902.00 .61 31364CNL8 6.290% 02/11/2002 DO 02/11/97 AAA 152,039.50 .36 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOW IN BE CONS ADS 4.944 4.839 AAA 100.734 99,936.00 .40 3133N7DR4 4.805% 01/22/2002 DO 01/20/99 AAA 100,734.00 .24 YLDANHL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 5 MSP07511102 2001/09/30 RUN DATE i 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 500,000.00 GNAC MTN 5.019 5.332 A2 100.336 501,560.00 2.01 33042MVP5 5.35D\ 12/07/2001 DO 12/07/98 A 501,600.00 1.1E 300,000.00 GMAC KIM 5.199 5.843 A2 101.081 302,140.00 1.21 33042NNN2 5.910% 03/11/2002 DD 03/10/99 A 3D3,243.00 .31 500,000.00 MELLER PIRL INC BE NTS 5.519 6.404 A3 100.244 503,020.00 2.01 4233298M 6.500% 11/01/2001 DD 11/04/96 A- 5D1.220.00 1.1E 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORN MTN 400642 5.543 5.244 A3 100.116 438,583.20 1.33 17120QJ36 5.250% 10/22/2001 DD 10/22/98 A- 440,519.20 1.04 400,000.00 FEDERAL MORE LN BK CURS BDS 5.356 4.959 AAA 100.330 397,312.00 1.61 3133M6R63 4.9751 11/23/2001 DD 11/23/98 AAA 401,320.00 .94 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN 4TR 00016 6.568 6.621 Al 100.201 500,268.50 2.01 44922YAR9 6.640% 10/29/2001 DD 10/29/99 Aa 501,405.00 1.18 1,ODO,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS 6.063 6.355 A3 100.322 995,534.00 4.03 893502BS2 6.335% 31/15/2001 DD 11/15/56 A- 1,003,220.00 2.36 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 6.960 8.500 A3 100.000 202,730.00 .90 122014AD5 8.500% 10/01/2001 DD 10/17/91 A- 200,000.00 .47 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.518 6.124 24,098,554.37 100.00 24,056,621.86 59.52 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 3.033 5.095 42,528,126.30 100.00 42,486,193.B3 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 WSF07522202 2001/09/30 RON DATE � 10/04/01 DISTRICTi SANG-TERM OPERATING RON TINE 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT HUODY HAREET TOTAL COST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HARHBT VALUE 4 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,100,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.634 2,092,308.17 4.58 74271RX44 10/04/2001 2,092,308.17 .52 43,499,483.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HOW .000 3.252 AAA 1DO.000 43,499,483.40 95.41 996085247 AAA 43,499,483.48 10.71 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 2.967 45,591,791.65 100.00 45,591,791.65 11.23 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF RIG .ODD 6.022 AAA 99.641 9,843.25O.OD 2.76 0IF0606AS 6.00% 10/01/2031 AAA 9,964.062.50 2.45 14,50D,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNNA SF HIS .000 6.353 AAA 102.312 24.735,625.00 4.11 OIN0626AS 6.5001 10/15/2031 AAA 14,835,240.00 3.65 14,000.ODO.00 COMMIT TO POR GNNA I SP RIG .000 3.603 AAA 105.216 14,686,875.00 4.00 01NUB06A0 8.00% 10/15/2031 AAA 24,730,520.00 3.63 7,500,000.00 ARBEUSER BUNCH COS INC NT .000 6.630 Al 101.815 7,646,250.00 2.11 035229AY9 6.350% 06/01/2005 DD 06/05/95 A. 7.636,125.00 1.88 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTM 4 TR 00459 .000 3.847 A2 300.07E 899,406.00 .24 023928VC4 MID RT 12/01/2003 DO 08/17/01 A 900,702.00 .22 1,200,000.00 COHNIT TO PON GNHA II GUMBOS .000 7.222 ARA 103.844 1,246,125.00 .34 21H0736A9 7.500% 10/20/2031 AAA 1,246,125.00 .31 4,500,000.00 DAIl6ER CHRYSLER NA COUP HT .000 3.899 A3 100.531 4,491,345.00 1.25 233835AN9 FLTG RT 12/16/2002 DO 12/15/00 A- 4.523,895.00 1.11 613,170.17 FWMC GROUP JG4-0353 .000 3.363 AAA 101.865 629,691.03 .13 3128DBNA2 7.S008 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/99 AAA 624,605.79 .15 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BK COMB BDS .000 6.515 AAA 109.358 7.993.625.00 2.27 3133NAUN7 0.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/08/00 AAA 8,201,050.00 2.02 20.OD0.000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BE CONS BDS .000 7.460 AAA 102.141 20,485,937.50 5.66 3133NASN2 7.620% 03/08/2005 DO 03/08/00 AAA 20,428,200.00 5.03 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE Y OCSF07522202 2001/09/30 RON DATE 10/04/01 DISTRIM LONG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME t 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL C0ST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------_ 26,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK COME DENS .000 4.953 AAA 101.766 28,032,812.50 7.90 31331LM S 5.040E 07/26/2004 DD 07/26/01 AAA 28,494,480.00 3.02 222.832.15 FRLIIC GROUP B78-6064 .000 6.231 AAA 101.594 207,683.41 .05 313488MK3 6.384% 01/01/2020 DD 12/01/97 AAA 216,265.33 .05 023,963.55 GERA II POOL #0080395 .D00 5.440 AAA 101.094 216,496.38 .23 3622SCNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 832,977.71 .21 6,972,971.53 OEM II POOL 4090408X .000 5.441 AAA 101.070 6,902,152.28 1.95 36225CF28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 ARA 3.048,140.16 1.34 4,000,000.00 GENERAL HIM ACCEP MTN 400615 .000 4.042 A2 98.609 3,998,440.00 1.09 32042MEBO FLTG RT O8/04/2D03 DO 08/03/01 A 3.944.360.00 .93 4,000,000.00 NASISCO In NEE .000 5.965 A2 102.674 4,081,440.00 1.13 629522CAB VAR AT 02/01/2033 DD 01/22/98 A 4,106,960.00 1.01 3,500,000.00 PARANONT CORKUMICATIOIIB IRC HT .000 7.416 A3 101.129 3,550,470.00 .90 699216AG2 7.5004 01/15/2002 DD O1/15/92 A- 3,539,515.00 .83 5,000,000.00 PBILIP RORRIE COS INC STE .000 7.002 A2 107.109 5,263.000.00 1.49 318154C88 3.500% 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5.355,450.00 1.32 4,130,525.49 SBA GTD DEV PARIS 2001-20C 1 .000 6.226 AAA 101.830 4,130,525.49 1.16 83162CW0 6.3409 03/01/2021 AAA 4,206,114.11 1.04 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARIS CTFS SBIC-PS O1 .000 6.365 AAA 104.320 3,000,D00.00 .06 831641DD4 6.640% 02/01/2011 3,129,600.00 .DD 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 8.003 A3 85.316 1,600,000.00 .33 9093138C2 6.8311 09/01/2003 DO O0/22/01 A- 1,365,056.00 .34 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS .000 6.094 AAA 123.062 2.369,074.22 .38 912810DX3 07.500% 11/15/2016 DO 11/15/96 AAA 2,830,426.00 .70 6,169,794.00 US THERE MY INFLATION INDEX FT .000 3.693 AAA 105.219 6,316,619.09 1.80 9120274Y5 3.8750 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,491,795.55 1.60 3,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.931 AAA 113.422 4,079,953.13 1.19 912927531 06.5000 02/15/2010 DD 02/15/00 AAA 4,310,036.00 1.06 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PER 01 SIR A .000 5.591 A3 102.845 3,487,680.00 .99' 927004RHO 5.750% 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,599,575.00 .89 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 0 OCSFOO522202 2001/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/04/01 DISTRICT: TANG-TERM OPERATING RON TIM 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 25,OJ0.120.OD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.817 3.279 AAA 102.937 23,112,861.90 3.35 9120232M3 3.3750 01/15/200O DO 01/15/97 AAA 26,526,988.42 6.53 1,936,337.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY BLOW IMF 4.702 3.634 AA3 100.428 1,803.044.22 .53 79549BMI 3.6501 02/14/2OD2 DD 0211419O A 1,944,624.62 .48 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.261 6.326 A3 103.375 1,438,920.00 .40 01240OGM6 6.540E 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,447,250.00 .36 3,950,000.00 GMAC NT8 5.752 3.68O A2 99.310 3,918,768.50 1.08 3004250V5 FLTG AT 08/10/2003 DO 08/17/98 A 3,922,745.00 .97 3.000,000.OD SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.049 6.451 A3 102.781 3,073,170.00 .95 812400JAI 6.630% 0I/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,083,430.00 .76 2.000,000.0O BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL HT 5.001 3.000 Al 99.872 1,992,900.00 .55 066365DN4 MIR AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 AA- 1,997,440.00 .49 15,500,000.00 PROEM NAIL MTG ASSN VERB 5.967 6.465 AAA 110.203 16.154.410.D0 4.03 31359MPB1 3.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 13.081,465.00 4.21 3,500,000.00 BELLSOUTE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.890 AA2 101.868 7,493,255.00 2.11 OI9867AX5 VAR AT 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 AAA 3.640,100.00 1.88 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.518 A2 103.562 3,030,250.00 .86 059165DN7 6.050% 12/15/2002 DD 12/20/00 A+ 3,106,060.00 .77 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.290 AAA 139.547 12,332,187.50 3.63 912810EG9 00.050E 09/15/2020 DO 08/15/90 AAA 13,256,965.00 3.26 1,500,000.OD CHRYSLER FINL LLC MIN 4TR00615 6.154 3.55E A3 99.250 1,499,415.00 .41 1712DOE00 FLTG AT 02/09/2002 DO 04/08/98 A 1,488,750.00 .37 3,000.DOD.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON M I DBMS 6.271 3.210 Al 100.002 2,994,300.00 .83 209111CUS VAR AT 06/15/2002 DD 06/20/57 A+ 3.00O,D60.00 .74 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MG ASSN NTN 6.291 1.136 AAA 101.531 4,488,705.00 1.26 31364CXV5 6.230E 03/01/2DO2 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4t568,895.00 1.13 3,0DO,000.00 SELLER PINL MTN 4TR 00246 6.300 3.961 A3 100.109 3,000,000.00 .83 42333BLFO MIND AT 04/28/20U3 DO 04/27/99 A- 3,003,270.00 .74 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MISS ACCEP 4TR 00562 6.303 3.797 A2 98.018 3,793,958.00 1.04 37042MEKO FLTO AT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3:351,284.00 .92 YLMKAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSF07522202 2001/09/30 RUN DATE i 10/04/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MERIT TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIELD S-P PRICE NAPRBT VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,246,223.00 FELIC NULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.199 AAA 101.704 2,248,679.45 .63 3133=295 VAR RT OB/15/2032 AAA 2,284,498.64 .56 1,921,683.37 GNNA STD RENIC TR 2000-9 PE 6.320 3.966 AAA 100.549 1,921,693.37 .53 3830B4NK9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,932,233.41 .48 2,000,000.00 BEAR STBARNS COS INC 6.330 6.480 A2 104.048 2,031,960.00 .50 003902MI 6.050% 04/15/2003 A 2,O90,160.00 .51 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDNARN 6.350 3.304 A2 98.607 3,000,OOO.DO .02 345393SR5 MW RT 03/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 A 2,960,610.00 .33 2,000,000.DO FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL SIR 6.351 3.963 A2 90.950 1,992,SBO.00 .54 345397RV9 MW RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,975,000.00 .49 22,202.48 GNNA POOL 00500917 6.389 5.981 AAA 100.312 21,075.01 .00 36210SPAO 6.0001 04/25/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 22,271.75 .01 70,526.41 GNNA POOL #0506636 6.309 5.981 AAA 100.312 66,944.99 .01 36210YY90 6.0001 04/15/2025 DO 04/01/99 AAA 70,746.45 .02 887,352.17 GNM POOL /0503388 6.309 5.901 AAA 100.312 842,291.32 .24 36210W55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 090,120.71 .22 26,136.43 GEM POOL #0499153 6.309 5.901 AAA 100.312 24,009.19 .00 36210O005 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 26,217.90 .01 17,343.19 0HM POOL #0496284 6.390 5.981 AAA 100.312 16,462.48 .00 3621ON351 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/O1111 AAA 17,397.30 .00 860,196.97 GNM POOL /0496461 6.390 5.901 RAN 100.312 816,515.08 .23 362IONQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD O1/01/99 AAA 862,880.1E .21 241,382.85 GNM POOL 00491103 6.390 5.982 AAA 100.312 229,125.13 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO O1/01/99 AAA 242,135.96 .06 22,585.71 GNNA POOL 00486720 6.390 5.981 AAA 100.312 21,438.79 .00 36210AVN6 6.000% 12/15/2020 DD 12/01/19 AAA 22,656.19 .01 42,514.47 GNNA POOL #0497343 6.310 5.981 AAA 100.312 40,355.54 .01 36210HP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 42,647.12 .01 45,035.16 GNM POOL #0469680 6.311 5.101 AAA 1DO.312 42,748.22 .01 36209EMS 6.000% II/I5/2O28 DO 11/01/10 AAA 45,175.67 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 10 0CSP07522202 2001/09/30 RUN DATE . 10/04/01 DISTRICT. LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE . 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARMY VALUE 1 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 53,495.69 GUM POOL 10467279 6.391 5.991 AAA 100.312 50,279.12 .01 36209CC03 6.0009 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/9B AAA 53,662.60 .01 79,650.66 GUM POOL 00457814 6.391 5.981 AAA 100.312 75,605.90 .02 36208OS93 6.0009 10/15/2024 DD 10/01/94 AAA 79,699.17 .02 055,517.94 GUM POOL 00467286 6.391 5.901 AAA 100.312 717,151.00 .21 36209CCE2 6.0001 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 057,875.16 .19 834,261.32 GUM POOL #0465555 6.392 5.981 AAA 100.312 791,000.34 .23 36209AE18 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/9B AAA 836,B97.16 .21 33,793.40 GUM POOL #0483452 6.392 5.981 AAA 100.312 32,070.32 .00 36209NBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 33,B98.81 .01 663,201.35 GUM POOL #0465546 6.392 5.981 AAA 100.312 819,366.91 .24 36209UT3 6.0006 O0125/2020 DD O8/01/98 ARA 815,994.54 .21 792,361.01 GUM POOL /0468339 6.392 5.981 AAA 100.312 752,107.81 .22 36209OBO0 6.000% O0/15/2020 DD O8/01/98 AAA 391,916.12 .20 46,303.62 GUM POOL #0430057 6.393 5.981 ARA 100.312 43,952.26 .01 36207PTU9 6.000% 05/15/202B DD 05/01/98 ARA 46,618.09 .01 11,201.1B GUM POOL #0466330 6.393 5.901 AAA 100.312 42,035.37 .01 36209DNF6 6.000E 05/15/2020 DD 05/01/98 AAA 44,422.35 .01 2,000,000.00 FW2NC NULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.234 AAA 104.270 2r000,eeB.00 .53 3133TDPV2 6.5001 09/25/2012 AAA 2,085,400.00 .51 2,636,900.49 FRINC NULTICLASS CT? SER 1620E 6.199 6.089 AAA 98.509 2,400,760.55 .72 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 2,599,422.22 .64 2,000,000.00 GALONON BB ULDGS NTN 6.625 3.951 MY 100.109 2,000,000.00 .55 79549ZZCS MW RT 04/20/2003 DD 04/28/00 AA- 2,002,180.00 .49 4,936,480.58 PH.NC GROUP 1G5-0636 6.629 6.903 AAA 101.409 5,013,613.08 1.38 3128DDOSS 2.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/O1/59 AAA 5,006,035.59 1.23 1,161,404.70 GUM II POOL 1080088N 6.305 6.261 AAA 101.013 1,169,520.3E .32 36225CC20 0.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 1,165,234.28 .29 2,U00,000.00 NARBB 6 NCLEURAN COB INC SR HT 6.710 6.225 A2 106.434 1,992,280.00 .59- S71768ABB 6.6251 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,120,690.00 .52 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2DO1/09/30 RUN DATE , 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM [ 11.13.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.434 A2 104.134 2,995,080.00 .86 345397SJ3 6.30U4 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 3[124[020.DO .37 900.000.00 FEDERAL BOLE LN BE CONS BDS 6Q7I 6.672 AAA 1O1.172 899,550.00 .25 3133MQll 6.350E 02/01/2002 DD 02/01/00 AAA 910,548.00 .22 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE 801E INS INC NT 6.066 6.438 A3 106.398 2,498,400.00 .73 2223)UAB8 6.950% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,659,950.00 .66 7.300.000.DO ONEOK INC NUN NT 6.960 4.353 A2 100.125 3.300,000.00 2.02 682680AJ2 FLTG RT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7.309,125.00 1.00 336,482.60 GNWA II POOL 10080023 6.992 7.440 AAA 102.484 789,343.10 .22 36225CAK9 VAR BY 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 795[330.43 .20 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BE EYE SB 00001 3.084 4.438 AA3 95.396 3.000,000.00 1.93 63982KAAG VAR AT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A4 6,985[I20.00 1.72 2,100,000.00 FSDwe* SAIL DID ENDS ONES 7.113 6.041 AAA 109.672 2,030,133.00 .63 31359MYS 6.625E 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/19 AAA 2,303,112.00 .57 2.000[000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 3.512 8.090 BAA3 101.360 2,151,250.00 .56 542611CT3 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 2,023[200.00 .50 1,284,599.85 GREYSTDNE SVCNG CORP FSA 195-1 7.564 3.335 AAA 100.750 1,265,832.64 .35 398109AE4 3.430% 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 1,294,234.35 .32 1,000,000.00 PORD NOSOR CR CO NT 7.582 6.488 A2 104.045 965,170.00 .28 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 1,040,450.00 .26 965,565.78 NIP/BUNTGOS PAIGE 6000-11150 7.684 7.229 AAA 103.750 544,594.90 .23 302998GE3 3.500% 12/01/2030 ON 10/21/99 AAA 1,001.724.50 .25 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP DECO NTN ITR 00115 7.309 6.395 A2 107.432 2,950,530.00 .89 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,222,960.00 .79 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ANNE WTN 7.724 6.406 AAA 101.469 32,498,400.00 9.90 31364GY32 6.500E 03/12/2009 DO 03/12/99 AAA 35,717,088.00 8.80 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 12 OCSP07522202 2001/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/04/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING ADS TIM t 11.13.29 PAR VALUE In AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ T TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ADDS YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NW 7.967 7.216 Al 109.156 2,594,032.00 .6E 020002MS 7.975% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 At 1,746,656.00 .63 ________ _______ ---------------- ________ SOUL PIAED INCOME SECURITIES 1.932 5.236 368,217,724.17 100.00 360:697r019.S6 EE.82 ------- ------- _________________ -------- TOTAL 1.927 S.121 393,509,515.82 100.00 406,O8E,821.19 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000100W 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SET FL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN 12-Sep-2001 -10,000,000.00 NA9123459 0.00 CW 12-Sep-2001 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 482,444.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2001 484444.47 996085247 04-Sep-2001 492,444.47 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 482,444.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2001 482,444.47 996085247 04-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 04-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,483.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2001 -20,493.44 996085247 04-Sep-2001 20,483.44 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,483.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-200I -20,483.44 996085247 04-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 04-Sep-2001 0.00 09-0ct-1001 10.49:51 Executive ft kbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OC G00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION] SE7TL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,230.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Sep-2001 -4,230.58 996085247 05-Sep-2001 4,230.58 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,230.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Sep-2001 -4,230.58 996085247 05-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 05-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Sep-2001 498,979.17 36959HWS2 09/262001 05-Sep-2001 499,979.17 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CDR 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Sep-2001 498,979.17 36959HWS2 0926/2001 05-Sep-2001 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CDR 05-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 05-Sep-2001 -896,790.25 63743CXC2 10/122001 05-Sep2001 896,790.25 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 05-Sep-2001 -896,790.25 63743CXC2 10/122001 05-Sep.2001 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 05-Sep2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,974.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2001 4,974.44 996085247 06-Sep-2001 4,974.44 B 0.00 09-Oct-1001 10:19:51 Ezecudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,974.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2001 -4,974.44 996095247 06-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 06-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 06-Sep-2001 -99,315.64 313397PHS MAT 11/16/2001 06-Sep-2001 99,315.64 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 06-Sep-2001 -99,315.64 313397PH8 MAT 11/16/2001 06-Sep-2001 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 06-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC O&Sep-2001 -896,248.25 313385ND4 MAT 10/19/2001 06-Sep-2001 896,248.25 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 06-Sep-2001 -896,249.25 313385ND4 MAT 10/19/2001 06-Sep-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 06-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 06-Sep-2001 -99,461.67 313313NTI MAT 11/02/2001 06-Sep-2001 99,461.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 06-Sep-2001 -99,461.67 313313NTI MAT 11/0212001 06-Sep-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 06-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-200/ 10.49:51 &i cuOw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, e PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCS&COxsouDATSO SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,794.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Sep-2001 -6,784.16 996085247 07-Sep-2001 6,784.16 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,784.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Sep-2001 -6,784.16 996095247 07-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Sep-2001 -196,629.89 07598SCB7 03/112002 07-Sep-2001 196,629.89 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Sep-2001 -196,628.89 07588SCB7 03/112002 07-Sep-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Sep-2001 -2,162,462.50 313589UG6 MAT 03/152002 07-Sep-2001 2,162,462.50 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE 2AETE 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Z200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Sep-2001 -2,162,462.50 313589UG6 MAT 03/152002 07-Sep-2001 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 762,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2001 -762,000.00 996095247 10-Sep-2001 762,000.00 B 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49.51 E mt,.Ww*bewh ., ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOUDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 762,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2001 -762,000.00 996095247 10-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 10-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,944,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Sep-2001 -1,944,000.00 996085247 12-Sep-2001 1,944,000.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,944,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Sep-2001 -1,944,000.00 996085247 12-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 12-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Sep-2001 -12,600,000.00 996085247 13-Sep-2001 12,600,000.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Sep-2001 -12,600,000.00 996085247 13-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 13-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 499,615.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2001 -499,615.63 996085247 17-Sep•2001 499,615.63 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 499,615.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2001 -499,615.63 996095247 17-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 I0:49.51 Eeecutim Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 838,476.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2001 -838,476.75 996095247 17-Sep-2001 838,476.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 839,476.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2001 438.476.75 996085247 17-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep•2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,845.21 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Sep-2001 -30,843.21 996087094 17-Sep-2001 30.845.21 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Sep-2001 -500,000.00 99384V901 03.000%09/182001 DD 09/17/ 17-Sep-2001 500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-SW2001 -500,000.00 99384V901 03.000%09/I82001 DO 09/171 17-SW2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,870.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 18-Sep-2001 -92,870.18 996085247 19-Sep-2001 92,870.18 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,870.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-SW2001 -92,870.18 996085247 IS-SeP2001 0.00 FC is-sep-ml 0.06 09-0ct-1001 10.49:51 Ereculive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,041.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT ISSep-2001 -1,000,041.67 996085247 18-Sep-2001 1,000,041.67 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,041.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT IB-Sep-2001 -1,000,041.67 996085247 18-Sep-2001 0.00 FC IS-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 18-Sep-2001 -8.50 996087094 18-Sep-2001 8.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,899,344.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2001 -1,899,344.44 996085247 19-Sep-2001 1,899,344.44 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,899,344.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2001 -1,899,344.44 996085247 19-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,516.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2001 -5,516.50 996085247 19-Sep-2001 5,516.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,516.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2001 -5,516.50 996085247 19-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 19-Sep-200I 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 &emliw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -3MEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2001 -3,200,000.00 996085247 20-Sep-2001 3,200,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200 000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2001 -3,200,000.00 9%085247 20-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,311,732.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2001 -7,317,732.76 996085247 20-Sep-2001 7,317,732.76 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,317,732.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2001 -7,317,732.76 996085247 20-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 19,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 21-ScI0001 -19,500,000.00 99384Z472 02.100%09242001 DD0921/ 21-Sep-2001 19,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 21-Sep-2001 -19,500,000.00 99384Z472 02.100%09242001 DO 09211 21-Sep-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 21-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,832,918.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-2001 -19,832,918.49 996085247 24-SW2001 19,832,918.49 9 0.00 09-Ocl-1001 10:49.51 Executive Wgrkbemh ,. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCac000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,832,918.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-2001 -19,832,918.49 996085247 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,039,583.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2001 -1,039,583.33 996085247 25-Sep-2001 1,039,583.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,039,583.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2001 -1,039,583.33 996085247 25-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 201,442.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2001 -201,442.42 996085247 25-Sep-2001 201,442.42 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 201,442.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2001 -201,442.42 996085247 25-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,017.76 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 25-Sep-2001 -10,017.76 996087094 25-Sep-2001 10,017.76 B 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 10,017.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Sep-2001 -10,017.76 996085247 26-Sep-2001 10,017.76 B 0.00 09-0ct-2001 10:49:51 Executive Wwkbeneb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,017.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26Sep-2001 -10,017.76 996095247 26-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 26-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 113,492.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Sep-2001 -113,492.92 996095247 28-Sep-2001 113,492.92 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 113,492.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Sep-2001 -113,492.92 996085247 28-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 28-Sep-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2001 -9,721,875.00 0IF060691 6.000Ya 09/01/2031 17-Sep-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Aug-2001 3,522,%8.75 OIN062698 6.500%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Aug-2001 -11,068,750.00 OING62698 6.500%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA If JUMBOS 15-Aug-2001 -1,235,250.00 21HO72692 7.500%09202031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 Eeeculiw Wgrkbewh „ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 15-Aug-2001 -12,513,750.00 OINOB0690 8.000%09/15/2031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 15-Aug-2001 -2,095,625.00 OINOS0690 8.000%09/15/2031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 10-Sep-2001 -9,843,750.00 01F0606A8 6.00%10/01/2031 15-W-2001 9,943,750.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FIRST UN CORP SUB NT 17-Sep-2001 -103,634.00 337358AM7 8.125%06/24/2002 DD 06/2419 24-Sep-2001 103,634.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FIRST UN CORP SUB NT 17-Sep-2001 -2,031.25 337358AM7 S.125%06/24/2002 DO 06/2419 24-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FIRST UN CORP SUB NT 17-Sep-2001 -105,665.25 337358AM7 8.125%06/24/2002 DO 06/24/9 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 17-Sep-2001 -206,194,00 931142BG7 6.875%0&/01/2002 DO 08101/0 24-Sep-2001 206,194.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 17-Sep-2001 -2,024.31 931142BG7 6.875%08/012002 DO 09/01/0 24-Sep-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 17-Sep-2001 -20V 18.31 931142BG7 6.875%091012002 DD 08/0110 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN JENRETT 17-Sep-2001 -147,009.70 257661AHI 5.875%04/012002 DD 0323/9 24-Sep-2001 147,009.70 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN JENRETT 17-Sep-2001 4,093.73 257661AHI 5.875%04/01/2002 DO 0323/9 24-Sep-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN JENRETT 17-Sep-2001 -151,103.43 257661AH1 5.875%041012002 DO 0323/9 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 24-Sep-2001 oho LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 85,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO NTS 18-Sep-2001 -96,759.50 345397RS4 6.550%09/102002 DO 09110/9 25-Sep-2001 86,759.50 g ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 85,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO NTS I8-Sep-2001 -231.98 345397RS4 6.550%09/102002 DD 0911019 25-SW2001 0.00 IB 0.00 09--0e1-2001 10:49.51 F.ecullw WQrkbexh -, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 85,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO NTS 18-Sep-2001 -86,991.48 345397RS4 6.550%09/10/2002 DD 0911019 25-Sep-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 115,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER NA HLDG CORP I8-Sep-2001 -116,769.85 233835AF4 7.125%03/012002 DO 03/1510 25-Sep-2001 116,769.95 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 115,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER NA HLDG CORP I8-Sep-2001 -546.25 233835AF4 7,125%03/01/2002 DD 03/15/0 25-Sep-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 115,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER NA HLDG CORP I8-Sep-2001 -117,316.10 233835AF4 7.125%0310112002 DD 0311510 25-Sep-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14.000,000,00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 -14,696,875.00 OIN0806A7 8.00%10/15/2031 22-Oct-2001 14,686,875.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 19-Sep-2001 -11,178,750.00 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2031 22.Oc1-2001 11,179,750.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 20-Sep4001 -1,246,125.00 21HO726A9 7.500%10202031 22-Oct-2001 1,246,125.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 09-Get-2001 10.49.51 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 20-Sep-2001 -3,556,975.00 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2031 22-Oct2001 3,556,875.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 13,118.99 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 0ISep-2001 -13,118.99 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01N 01-Sep-2001 13.118.99 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,118.99 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Sep-200I -13,118.99 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 19-Sep-2001 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Sep-2001 1,007,211.28 313589MF7 MAT 09272001 07-Sep-2001 -1,007,211.28 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Sep-2001 880.94 313589MF7 MAT 09272001 07-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 09-On-2001 10:49:51 - Eeemiw Wmkbewh - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocscooaowo 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4L010,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Sep-2001 1,008,092.22 313589MF7 MAT 09/2712001 07-Sep-2001 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-SW2001 1,196,2IT84 36959HWS2 09/26/2001 07-SW2001 -1,196,217.84 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Sep-2001 1,565.49 36959HWS2 09/26/2001 07-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Sep-2001 1,197,783.33 36959HWS2 09/26/2001 07-Sep-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30.845.21 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT I8-Sep-2001 •30,845.21 996087094 18-Sep-2001 -30,845.21 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE PH REPO 18-Sep-2001 500,000.00 99384V901 03.000%09/182001 DO 09/17/ 18-Sep-2001 -500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.w CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO I8-Sep-2001 41.67 99384V901 03.000%09/182001 DO 09/17/ 1B-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49.51 Emcultm Workbe mb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 18-Sep-2001 50D,041.67 99384V901 03.000%09/19/2001 DD 09/17/ 18-Sry-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C IBSep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-Sep-2001 996,39250 02581RWT6 09/27/2001 19-Sep-2001 -996,39250 S BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-SW2001 2,951.94 02581RWT6 09/27/2001 19-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -I,00D,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-Sep-2001 999,344.44 0258IRWT6 09/272001 19-Sep-2001 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 19-Sep-2001 8,50 996087094 19-Sep-2001 -8.50 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Sep-2001 19,500,000.00 996095247 21Sep-2001 -19.500,000.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 21Sep-2001 19,500.00000 996085247 21Sep4001 0,00 FC 21-sep-2001 0.00 05LOCI-2001 10:l9:51 Eeetufhv Workbemh , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: n PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRA14SCOVE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 464,986.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-2001 464,986.99 996085247 24-Sep-2001 464,986.99 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 464,986.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Sep-2001 464,986.99 996085247 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Sep-2001 19,500,000.00 99384Z472 02.100%09242001 DD 09/21/ 24-Sep-2001 -19,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Sep-2001 3,412.50 99384Z472 02.100%09242001 DO 0921/ 24-Sep-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19.500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Sep-2001 19,503,412.50 99384Z472 02.100%09242001 DO 0921/ 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,017.76 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 26-Sep-2001 10,017.76 9%087094 26-Sep-2001 -10,017.76 S 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTES 30-Aug-2001 208,205.60 9128276E7 06.625%0513 12 0 0 2 DO 0521/ 31-Aug-2001 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 04-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 Executfw Wmkbewb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY UI TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -)0,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 10-Sep-2001 9,965,625.00 OIFG60691 6.0001%09/012031 17-Sep-2001 -9,721,975.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 143,750.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 10-Sep-2001 9,865,625.00 0IF060691 6.000%09/012031 17-Sep.2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 11,209,257.81 OIN062698 6.500%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 -11,069,221.81 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 140,036.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 11,209,257.81 OIN062699 6.500%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 12,601,875.00 0IN080690 8.000%09/152031 24-Sep-200I -12,513.750.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK - 98,125.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 12,601,873.00 OIN090690 8.000%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 2,100,312.51 OINOB0690 8.000%09/15/2031 24-Sep-2001 -2,085,625.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 14,687.51 09-Oca2001 10:49:51 &,e .ltw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 19-Sep-2001 2,100,312.51 OINOS0690 8.000%09/15/2031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 20-Sep-2001 3,566,308.59 01NO62699 6.500%09/15/2031 24-Sep-2001 -3,522,496.94 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 43,81 L65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 20-Sep-2001 3,566,308.59 OING62698 6.500%09/152031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 20-Sep•2001 1,247,812.50 21HO72692 7.500%09202031 24-Sep-2001 -1,235,250.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 12,562.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 20-Sep-2001 1,247,812.50 21HO72692 7.500%09202031 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 24-Sep-2001 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,062.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jul-2001 -57,062.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/15/2032 15-Jul-2001 57,124.40 PDC 62.40 09-Oct-2001 10.49.51 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GADLLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PRACO -57,062.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jul-2001 57,062.00 3133TCE95 VARRTOB/152032 15-1ul-2001 -57,124.40 PD -62.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .57,062.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTP E3 A 15-Jul-2001 57,062.00 3133TCE95 VARRTOB/152032 15-Jul-2001 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,760.45 FHLMC GROUP#786064 01-Aug-2001 3,760.45 31348SWZ3 6.394%01/012028 DD 12/011 01-Aug-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,616.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 15-Aug-2001 69,616.00 3133TCE95 VARRT09/15/2032 15-Aug-2001 68,691.04 PD -75.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.17 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Sep-2001 40.17 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -38.13 PD 2.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.17 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Sep-2001 40.17 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -665.87 GNMA POOL8046968B 01-Sep-2001 66547 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD 11/01/ 01-Sep-2001 632.06 PD 33.81 09.Oct-2001 10.49.51 Executive Workbench . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE r 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -665.87 GNMA POOLN0469688 01-Sep-2001 665.87 36209EXRS 6.000%111]5/2029 DO 11/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -996.40 GNMA POOLN0468339 01-Sep-2001 996.40 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/011 01-Sep-2001 -945.90 PD 50.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -996.40 GNMA POOLN0468339 01-Sep-2001 996.40 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/OI/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -76.47 GNMA POOLN0468330 01-Sep-2001 76.47 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -72.59 PD 3.88 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .76.47 GNMA POOL N0468330 01-Sep-2001 76.47 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DD 05/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37.55 GNMA POOLN0486720 01-Sep-2001 37.55 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152029 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -35.64 PD 1.91 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37.55 GNMA POOL 90486720 01-Sep-2001 37.55 36210AVM6 6.000%12JI 52028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 - 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49.51 EvecuOve Wwkbermh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE..- 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000loo00 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,046.98 GNMA POOLM0491103 01-Sep-2001 1,046.99 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/0l/ 01-Sep-2001 -993.81 PD 53.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,046.98 GNMA POOLOD491103 01-Sep-2001 1,046.98 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -799.61 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Sep-2001 799.61 362IONP45 6.000%1 2/1 512 0 2 8 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -759.00 PD 40.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -799.61 GNMA POOL80497343 01-Sep-2001 799.61 362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,104.69 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Sep-2001 1,104.69 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Sep-2001 .1,048.59 PD 56.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,104.69 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Sep-2001 1,104.69 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD0l/0l/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22.38 GNMA POOLp04%284 01-Sep-2001 22.38 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -21.24 PD 1.14 09-Oct-2001 /0:49:31 Exewiw Wgekbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22.38 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Sep-2001 22.38 36210M151 6.000°/.01/152029 DO 021011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,984.71 FHLMC GROUP BG4-0353 01-Sep-2001 12,984.71 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -13,313.39 PD -328.68 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,984.71 FHLMC GROUP#04-0353 01-Sep-2001 12,984.71 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -292,815.74 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Sep-2001 292,815.74 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -297,390.99 PI) 4,375.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -292,915.74 FHLMC GROUP NGS-0476 01-Sep-2001 292,815.74 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54.36 GNMA POOL90439057 01-Sep-2001 54.36 36207PTN9 6.00W°/.05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Sep-2001 .51.60 PD 2.76 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ' -54.36 GNMA POOL80438057 01-Sep-2001 54.36 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct2001 10:49:5I Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE..- 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00016000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -112.16 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Sep-2001 112.16 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2029 DD WWI 01-Sep-2001 -106.46 PD 5.70 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .112.16 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Sep-2001 112.16 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028DDI0/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,140,43 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Sep-2001 1,140.43 36209CCX2 6.000%10/16/2028 DO 101011 01Sep-2001 -1,082.52 PD 57.91 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,140.43 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Sep-2001 1,140.43 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -86.04 GNMA POOL 80467279 01-Sep-2001 86.04 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Sep-2001 .81.67 PD 4.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .86.04 ONMA POOL80467279 01-Sep-2001 86.04 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028DD10/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -30,204.47 GNMA POOL40465555 01-Sep-2001 30,204.47 36209AE48 6.000%O9/152028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 28,670.65 PD 1,533.92 09-Ocr-2001 10:49:51 Ewwm Wwl6ewh -, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,204.47 GNMA POOLN0465555 01Sep-2001 30,204.47 36209AE49 6.000%09115/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,415.51 GNMA POOLN0465546 01-Sep-2001 9,415.51 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD OB/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -7,988.16 PD 427.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,415.51 GNMA POOLN0465546 01-Sep-2001 8,415.51 36209AE13 6.000%0 6/1 52 0 2 8DDO8/Ol/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,651.80 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 01-Sep-2001 27,651.80 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 1210119 01-Sep-2001 -28,109.78 PI) 457.98 LONG TERM OPER-PUACO -27,651.90 GNMA U POOL NOO90023 01-Sep-2001 27,651.80 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12/0119 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,407.54 GNMA II POOL N080088M 01-Sep-2001 49,407.54 36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DD 061011 01-Sep-2001 -50,498.33 PD -1,080.79 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,407.54 GNMA 11 POOL N080088M 01-Scp-2001 49,407.54 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DD 06/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10.49:51 &ecom Wo Wmh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -383.10 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Sep-2001 383.10 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/011 01-Sep-2001 -363.65 PD 19.45 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -383.10 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Sep-2001 383.10 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,117.75 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Sep-2001 1,117.75 36210VF55 COW%03/152029 DD 03/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -100.99 PD 56.76 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,117.75 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Sep-2001 1,117.75 36210VF53 6.000%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.39 GNMA POOL 00500917 01-Sep-2001 33.39 36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -31.69 PD 1.70 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.39 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Sep-2001 33.39 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.27 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Sep-2001 31.27 3621000E5 6.000%07/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -29.68 PD 1.59 09.0cf-2001 10:49:51 &emliw Workbexh ., ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.27 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Sep-2001 31.27 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,060.30 GNMA 11 POOL#0090395 01-Sep-2001 23,060.30 36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -22,851.32 PD 208.98 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,060.30 GNMA Il POOL#0080395 01-Sep-2001 23,060.30 36225CNM4 6.5009%04202030 DO 04/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,474.51 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 01-Sep-2001 69,474.51 93162CUO 6.340%031012021 01-Sep-2001 -69,474.51 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,474.51 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 01-Sep-2001 69,474.51 83162CLJO 6.340%03/012021 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 18-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,542.25 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Sep-2001 169,542.25 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DD 051011 01-Sep-2001 -167,820.34 PD 1,721.91 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,542.25 GNMA U POOL 9080408X 01Sep3001 169,542.25 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DD 051011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10.49:51 &ecutiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -4,032.25 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Sep-2001 4,032.25 31348SW73 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 -3.933.96 PD 98.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,051.25 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Sep-2001 2,051.25 398108AE4 7.4309/.06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-Sep-2001 -2,021.28 PD 29.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,051.25 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Sep-2001 2,051.25 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,221.12 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Sep-2001 55,221.12 3837114NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2001 -55,221.12 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.221.12 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Sep-2001 55,221.12 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2001 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2001 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Sep-2001 497,137.79 36959HW52 09/052001 05-Sep-2001 -497,137.78 MT 05-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oc1-2001 10.49:51 Executive Workbench -, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 MERCK&CO DISC 05-Sep-200I 897,382.75 58933RW55 09/05/2001 05-Sep-2001 -897,382.75 MT 05-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Sep-2001 1,099,242.93 313589L10 MAT 09/062001 06-Sep-2001 -1.099,242.83 MT 06-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -I60,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 07-Sep-2001 159,436.99 74271RW78 09/07/2001 07-Sep-2001 -159,436.89 MT 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Sep-2001 10,772,310.00 36959HWC7 09/122001 12-Sep-2001 -10,772,310.00 MT 12-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,600,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 13-Sep-2001 12,574,348.50 02581RWDI 09/132001 13-Sep-2001 -12,574,348.50 MT 13-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC IB-Sep-2001 997,583.34 26354AW19 09/182001 18-Sep-2001 -997,583.34 MT 18-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900.000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 19-Sep-2001 888,065.00 90328AWK5 09/192001 19-Sep-2001 988,065.00 MT 19-Sep-2001 0.00 09-0et-2001 10.49:51 Erecuhee Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Sep-2001 3,134,934.67 313589LY7 MAT 09202001 20-Sep-2001 -3,134,834.67 MT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Sep-2001 6,981,053.33 36959HWL7 09202001 20-Sep-2001 -6,981,053.33 MT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS DISC 25-Sep-2001 198,312.50 52517JWR2 09252001 25-Sep-2001 -199,312.50 MT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 15-Sep-2001 440,000.00 345370AY6 9.000%09/152001 DD 09/15/9 15-Sep-2001 449,219.20 MT 15-Sep-2001 -8,219.20 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 25-Sep-2001 200,000.00 42333HKJO 5.750%09252001 DID 092519 25-Sep-2001 -197,772.00 MT 25-Sep-2001 2,228.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 25-Sep-2001 1,000,000.00 42333HKJO 5.750%09252001 DO 092519 25-Sep-2001 -999,730.00 MT 25-Sep-2001 270.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 28-Sep-2001 75,000.00 3133MCAZS 6.500°/.0928/2001 DO 09/28/0 28-Sep-2001 -75,271.50 MT 28-Sep-2001 .271.50 09-0cn2001 10:49.51 Executive Wa Wwh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -35,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 28-Sep-2001 35,000.00 3133M9XN7 6.200%09/28/2001 DO 0928/ 28-Sep-2001 -35,058.80 MT 28-Sep-2001 -58.80 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -%540.00 TO BRING INTO BALANCE AS OF 26-Sep-2001 0.00 9128272M3 9/30/01 27-Sep-2001 -61,472.57 SW -61,472.57 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,473.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANC 27-Sep-2001 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Sep-2001 -16,965.01 SW -16,965.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,172.70 BALANCE TO FACTOR AS OF 27-Sep-2001 0.00 79549BBOI 09.30.01 1.11927. 28-Sep-2001 -4,818A9 SW -4,81SA9 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 04-Sep-2001 140,175.00 31364CXV5 6.230%03/012002 DO 03/03/9 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Od-200/ 10.49:51 E.c "Wo kkwh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BANK ONE CORP SUB 04-Sep-2001 20,250.00 06423AAAI 8.100-A 03/01/2002 DO 03/0119 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECT)MTN kTR 0011 04Sep-2001 109,500.00 69512EEU5 7.300%10/22/2004 DD 1022/9 01-Sep-2001 0.00 1T 04-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2001 39,770.61 996085247 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04Sep-2001 233.44 996085247 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Sep-2001 2,862.22 36959HW52 09/05/2001 05-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 05Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 MERCK&CO DISC 05-Sep-2001 2,617.25 59933RW55 09/052001 05-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 05-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Sep-200I 757.17 313589L30 MAT 09/062001 06-Sep-2001 - 0.00 IT 06-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oc1-200/ 10:49.51 &ecutiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 160,000.00 PROCCER&GAMBLE DISC 07-Sep-2001 563.11 74271RW78 09/07/2001 07-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 07-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 10-Sep-2001 762,000.00 3133MAZW2 7.620%03/08/2005 DD 03/08/0 08-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 10-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 12-Sep-2001 1,144,000.00 31364GY32 6.5001/.03/12/2009 DD 0311219 12-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 12-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Sep-2001 27,690.00 36959HWC7 09/12/2001 12-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 12-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 13-Sep-2001 25,651.50 0258IRWDI 09/13/2001 13-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 13-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 17-Sep-2001 19,800.00 345370AY6 9.000%09/15/2001 DD 09/15/9 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 675,000.00 BANKAMERICA CORP SUB NT 17-Sep-2001 28,265.63 066050BQ7 8.375%03/15/2002 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY R3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 00064 17-Sep-2001 11,550.00 17120QJ36 5.2500Y.10/22/2001 DO 1022/9 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 17-Sep-2001 69,562.50 31359MEY5 6.625%09/15/2009 DO 09/0119 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 17-Sep-2001 82,000.00 542671CT7 8.200%03/152023 DO 03/2819 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 DAIMLER CHRYSLER NA CORP NT 17-Sep-2001 52,865.31 233835AM9 FLTG RT 12/162002 DO 12/15/ 17-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 17-Sep-2001 30,845.21 345397SR5 FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/ 17-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22.38 GNMA POOL#0496284 17-Sep-2001 86.93 36210M351 6.000%01/152029 DO 02/011 01-Sep-20D1 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,104.69 GNMA POOL#0496461 17-Sep-2001 4,306.51 36210MQN4 6.0009/.01/152029 DO 01101/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Od-200/ 10..49.51 Fiecutm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 799.61 GNMA POOL40497343 17-Sep-2001 216.57 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 lT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31.27 GNMA POOL#0499153 17-Sep-2001 130.84 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33.39 GNMA POOL#0500917 17-Sep-2001 111.18 36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,117.75 GNMA POOL#0503388 17-Scp-2001 4,442.35 36210VF55 6.0 0 00/0 03/1 5202 9DD03/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 383.10 GNMA POOL#0506636 17-Sep-2001 354.55 36210YY90 6.000Yo04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,760.45 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 17-Sep-2001 1,170.99 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Aug-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54.36 GNMA POOL#0438057 17-Sep-2001 231.79 36207PTN9 6.0000/e05/152028 DO 05/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct2001 10:49:51 Emcutlm Wwk6ench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 112.16 GNMA P001,40457814 17-Sep-2001 398.91 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,415.51 ONMA POOLA0465546 17-Sep-2001 4,358.09 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 1T 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,204.47 GNMA POOL 80465555 17-Sep-2001 4,322.24 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 1T 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 86.04 GNMA POOLN0467279 17-Sep-2001 267.91 36209CCQ7 6.0001.10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,140.43 GNMA POOL#0467286 17-Sep-2001 3,783.29 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 76.47 GNMA POOL®0468330 17-Sep-2001 221.80 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 996.40 GNMA POOL 80468339 17-Sep-2001 3,966.70 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-2001 10:49:51 Evecutiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000lo000 01-SEP-2001 -30SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 665.87 GNMA POOL p0469688 17-Sep-2001 228.51 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028DD11/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.17 GNMA POOL 80483452 17-Sep-2001 169.17 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37.55 GNMA POOL80486720 17-Sep-2001 113.12 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,046.98 GNMA POOL#0491103 17-Sep-2001 1,212.15 36210FRY4 6.0000/.01/152029 DD 01/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,994.71 FHLMC GROUP SG4-0353 17-Sep-2001 3,913.47 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/011 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 292,815.74 FHLMC GROUP SG"476 17-Sep-2001 30,504.23 3128DD055 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,221.12 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 17-Sep-2001 6,803.85 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 09-00-200/ 10.49.51 Executive Wmkbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2001 -30SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 17-Sep-2001 30,283.33 209111CU5 VAR FIT 0 611 5/2 0 0 2 DO 0620/ 15-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-Sep-2001 2,416.66 26354AW39 09/182001 18-Sep-2001 0.00 IT I8-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,474.51 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C I 18-Sep-2001 123,524.35 83162CLIO 6.340%03/012021 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT I8-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC M7N NTRO06 19-Sep-2001 5,512.50 17120QESO FLTG RT 09/082002 DO 04/08/ 19-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 19-Sep-2001 11,935.00 90328AWK5 09/192001 19-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,062.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 19-Sep-2001 12,800.35 3133TCE95 VARRT08/15/2032 15-Aug-2001 0.00 IT 19-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,118.99 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 19-Sep-2001 13,118.99 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 19-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oe62001 10.49:51 Executive Wwkbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Sep-2001 18,946.67 36959HWL7 09202001 20-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Sep-2001 65,165.33 313589LY7 MAT 09202001 20-Sep-2001 0.00 1T 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,651.80 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 20-Sep-2001 5,109.60 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/01N 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2001 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,407.54 GNMA If POOL 0080088M 20-Sep-2001 6,342.55 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,060.30 GNMA II POOL#0080395 20-Sep-2001 3,882.19 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04101/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 169,542.25 GNMA II POOL#080408X 20Sep-2001 32,736.53 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DO 05101/ 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 25-Sep-2001 28,750.00 42333HKJO 5.750%09252001 DO 09/2519 25-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oc1-2001 10:49:51 &emfiw Wa kbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01SEP-2001 -30-SEP-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Sep-2001 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 25-Sep-2001 5,750.00 42333HKJO 5.750%0925/2001 DD 0912519 25-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS DISC 25-Sep-2001 1,687.50 52517JWR2 09252001 25-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,051.25 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 25-Sep-2001 7,966.51 398108AE4 7.430%06/0120D3 DD 022910 01-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 28-Sep-2001 1,085.00 3133M9XN7 6.200%09282001 DO 09281 28-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 28-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 28-Sep-2001 2,437.50 3133MCAZB 6.500%09292001 DO 0928/0 28-Sep-2001 0.00 IT 28-Sep-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 28-Sep-2001 -29.59 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 28-Sep-2001 0.00 CW 28-Sep-2001 0.00 09-Oct-1001 10.49:51 &emfiw Wonkbeneh - FAHIR COMMITTEE "0172.Date TOad. j'0'1" 10/10/01 10/29/O1 AGENDA REPORT Rem R017 Rem Nud FNiNumM 19(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources and Employee Development Originator: Denise Martinez, Human Resources Assistant SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-18, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. SUMMARY The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy Number From To Reason for Change And Subject D90.00 Tuition Reimbursement P ram Current Lan ua a RaNsed tan ua a Cladfipdon of Promdums ALTERNATIVES NIA CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. D90.00 -Tuition Reimbursement Program G W AWE gwda�NAWe R.yb t Bw Ag ReP %WIkMAHFP&Pd. a .m: v l Page 2 graue,ty Ren 114du wwryu v1 c lym c cnyc ucc terc....Ny u syllabus (if requesting reimbursement for required textbooks, materials and/or supplies)and (4)a copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to the HR&ED Division within 60 calendar days following the course end date. Requests for Tuition Reimbursement received in the HR& ED Division more than 60 days after the course end date wlfl not be approved. 6.2.1 The HR& ED Manager(or designee)will sign completed requests. Copies of the approved request will be mailed interoffice to the employee and submitted to the Accounting Division for reimbursement. 6.2.2 Incomplete requests will be returned to the employee with explanation(s) attached. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made. Orange County Policy Number: D90.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24,, 2000 October 24, 2001 Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes: ^^'^bo�> er 22, 19" �oo7 PROGRAM May24, 2000 Approved by: Lisa L. Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE This program is designed to encourage self-development of District employees by providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational courses at accredited wlleges, universities, or other institutions approved by the Human Resources and Employee Development(HR& ED)Division, provided that such courses are primarily for the purpose of: • increasing capabilities in the employee's present position within the District • preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to advance within the District • updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED This policy applies to all District employees who have completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19 hours per week.This policy does not apply to temporary employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualifying Employees:All District employees who have completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19 hours per week. 3.2 Tuition Reimbursement:a program in which qualifying employees who successfully complete District-approved courses,on their own time,at accredited wlleges, universities or other institutions approved by the HR& ED Division, within the guidelines of this policy, win be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete educational courses that serve the mission and goals of the District at the sole determination of the District in compliance with this policy based upon the number of hours worked per week as follows. HOURS OF WORK PER WEEK PERCENT OF REIMBURSEMENT 0-19 NOT ELIGIBLE-0% 20-29 50% 30-39 75% 40 100% Page 1 of 4 9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended. 9.2 Sections 127 and 132-J8 of the Internal Revenue Code. 9.3 Tuition Reimbursement Prappproval Application(attachment A) 9A Request for Tuition Reimbursement(attachment B) Page 4 of 4 Eligible Expanses Ineligible Expenses • Tuition Travel • Registration fees • Optional student fees • Laboratory fees • Doctoral dissertation fees • Parking fees • Masters thesis fees • Health fees • Supplemental textbook costs • Application fees • Supplies and materials used • Required textbooks and for the course and retained by materials per the course the employee after course syllabus completion (i.e., paper, • Supplies required per the pencils,notebooks,diskettes, course syllabus not to etc.) exceed$100.00 per Graduation or diploma fees course 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program,employees must submit a completed Tuition Reimbursement Application (attachment A)and a copy of the course description which includes the course cost,course starUend date,and number of units for each course to the HR& ED Division NO LATER THAN one day prior to the course start date. • Tuition Reimbursement Applications received in the HR&ED Division on or after the course start date will not be approved. Page 2 of 4 Orange County Policy Number: D90.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 October 24, 2001 Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes: October-2?, 1997 PROGRAM May 24, 2000 Approved by: Lisa L. Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE This program is designed to encourage self-development of District employees by providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational courses at accredited colleges, universities, or other institutions approved by the Human Resources and Employee Development(HR& ED)Division, provided that such courses are primarily for the purpose of: • increasing capabilities in the employee's present position within the District • preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to advance within the District • updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED This policy applies to all District employees who have completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19 hours per week. This policy does not apply to temporary employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualifying Employees:All District employees who have completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19 hours per week. 3.2 Tuition Reimbursement: a program in which qualifying employees who successfully complete District-approved courses,on their own time,at accredited colleges, universities or other institutions approved by the HR& ED Division, within the guidelines of this policy, can be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete educational courses that serve the mission and goals of the District at the sole determination of the District in compliance with this policy based upon the number of hours worked per week as follows. HOURS OF WORK PER WEEK I PERCENT OF REIMBURSEMENT 0-19 NOTELIGIB.E-0% 20-29 1 50% " 30-39 75% 40 1 100% Page 1 of 5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Employees can be reimbursed for the following: 5.1.1 Specific,job-related Associate and Baccalaureate and-Graduate degree programcourses. 5.1.2 Specific,job-related courses through accredited colleges or universities. 5.1.3 Specific,job-related courses offered through an institution of study approved by the HR&ED Division. 5.1.3.1 The Division Manager is responsible for determining whether or not the course is"job-related." 52 Requests,- rrermbursement of curses above,Bachelor's degree leya4requlrg d FTiYma�.IiJ3esourees ap n �etLeisl rtz�"a I`betadY� more.e'Sde'rtsly� ,u ud'uig ana'nalys ef`e_rmrne'BSie va'Tl elo the _' wjioseb�cgarses or degreeprggrafn; 5.3 When an employee successfully completes a course with a grade of "C°or better and within the guidelines of this policy,the District will reimburse the employee for eligible expenses incurred, based on the number of hours worked per week,not to exceed$5,250 per calendar year. 5.4 Appidvedl imbursemmts above BaeheWes degt�Jevel Moll bezepoited as tazatilet0c ale aer'`s'eghonY27 ofthe'�In'temal Revent��e- Examples of eligible and ineligible expenses are: Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses • Tuition Travel • Registration fees • Optional student fees • Laboratory fees • Doctoral dissertation fees • Parking fees • Masters thesis fees • Health fees • Supplemental textbook costs • Application fees • Supplies and materials used • Required textbooks and for the course and retained by materials per the course the employee after course syllabus completion (i.e.. paper, • Supplies required per the pencils, notebooks,diskettes, course syllabus not to etc.) exceed$100.00 per Graduation or diploma fees course 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program, employees must submit a completed Tuition Reimbursement Application (attachment A)and a copy of the course description which includes the course cost,course start/end date,and number of units for each course to the HR& ED Division NO LATER THAN one day Prior to the course start date. • Tuition Reimbursement Applications received in the HR& ED Division on or after the course start date will not be approved. Page 2 of 4 6.1.1 The HR&ED Director(or designee)will sign completed applications. A copy of the approved application will be mailed interoffice to the employee to be re-submitted upon course completion. 6.1.2 Incomplete applications will be returned to the employee with explanation(s)attached. 6.2 Upon course completion,the employee must complete and submit a Request for Tuition Reimbursement(attachment B)along with(1)an official record of the final grade, (2)itemized receipts for eligible expenses, (3)a copy of the course syllabus(if requesting reimbursement for required textbooks,materials andlor supplies)and(4)a copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to the HR&ED Division within 60 calendar days following the course end date. • Requests for Tuition Reimbursement received in the HR& ED Division more than 60 days after the course end date will not be approved. 6.2.1 The HR&ED Manager(or designee)will sign completed requests. Copies of the approved request will be mailed interoffice to the employee and submitted to the Accounting Division for reimbursement. 6.2.2 Incomplete requests will be returned to the employee with explanations) attached. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made. 7.2 This policy does not apply to temporary employees. 7.3 Reimbursement may be authorized whenever the employee's manager and HR &ED Manager(or designee)determine that there is substantial benefit to be derived by the District when an employee takes a course that does not meet the requirements of this policy. 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 Tuition Reimbursement Applications received in the HR&ED Division on or after the course start date will not be approved. 8.2 Requests for Tuition Reimbursement received in the HR&ED Division more than 60 days after the course end date will not be approved. 83 ., �.g,. ,y,.... 8.4 Should4n- employee voluntarily te4matatit empioymentwith the District 1-12 months_aRer recefvrnmrelmbursemenn,h"eCs`he'agreeslo repay the District100% of 11 the funds mosiVid through this "'mmm':"N411hin the twelve-month periodpitor to the Gale ofhi611i'9rvo(untergte'imi0» " 8.5 Sfiou�dan emj!Io�jee voluntany terrpirWte tkrlployment W.M IN)District 13.24 monthsiaRe r ,)mbucsemem,l ' e agreesto tepay,#I&District 669'0 of alPfundsse elveE38t f 3thrs program. `the M'elve-_month pedbtl prior to the date of hislFter v teftninationi Page 3 of 4 8 6 70 W mdyjaa eory( b„p ?�en49 '�toas r �1he 33%0( all'fult$ hgmr�°� :�3 ' 4 " l� W?:SRon�P�R fryeldate 4t ervolunfa'ry tertsi Bon! 8.7 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee meets the criteria specified in this policy. 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended. 9.2 Sections 127 and 132-J8 of the Internal Revenue Code. 9.3 Tuition Reimbursement Pin pjroYel Application (attachment A) 9.4 Request for Tuition Reimbursement(attachment B) Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-18 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING THE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. D90.00,Tuition Reimbursement Program, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 24, 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary G:\wp.dtaWdmin\BSViawlutons\2001\01-18.doc FAKIR COMMITTEE McLun,Dale Tosd.' In 10,10101 10/14/0l AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHROI-66 14 e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed SUBJECT: SAWPA AGREEMENT FOR DESALTER BRINE CAPACITY RIGHTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the Agreement to Establish the Purchase Price for, and the Purchase of, A 2.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Capacity Right for Desalter Brine with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), for a total amount of$5,252,015.26. SUMMARY • Since 1972 the District has provided treatment and disposal services for some "non- reclaimable" wastewater from SAWPA. • SAWPA owns 30 mgd capacity in the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI)and 11 mgd capacity in the OCSD treatment and disposal system. • The 1972 Agreement was modified in 1996 to allow capacity purchases in 1 mgd increments and to establish a formula to compute the price based upon the 1989 Master Plan and the average strength of all wastewater received from SAWPA. • In 1999 a separate agreement was approved to allow the purchase of capacity especially for low-strength discharge from groundwater desalter projects. • The proposed agreement would allow SAWPA to purchase another 2 mgd of treatment and disposal capacity only for low-strength discharge. • The low-strength agreement is appropriate as SAWPA is endeavoring to remove most higher strength dischargers from the system and because it encourages SAWPA to improve the groundwater supply in their basin. • The rates per million gallons, 1,000 pounds of BOD and TSS are the same as those charged our Class 1 Permit Users except the charges for the collection system have been deducted, as SAWPA already owns sufficient capacity in the SARI. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed agreement would result in capacity right sales of$5,252,015.26 based upon the low BOD and TSS in the desalter brine discharge. Use of the higher strength average concentration of the total SAWPA discharge could raise the price to SAWPA to $9,750,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES • Do not approve this agreement and charge SAWPA in accordance with the existing 1996 Agreement. This Agreement needs to be renegotiated as the 1999 Strategic Plan and the resultant Capital Facilities Capacity Charge changed the assumptions underlying the capacity purchase assumptions. This negotiation has started, but is not expected to be completed in time for the new desalter facilities to come on line. • Modify the rates in the proposed agreement. This is possible, but the proposed rates are the same as those charged other high flow or high strength dischargers. The rates have been reduced because SAWPA already owns 30 mgd capacity in the collection system and this treatment and disposal capacity purchase will only increase that capacity to 13 mgd. The concentrations of BOD and TSS have been verified with the discharge from other desalter facilities. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreement to Establish the Purchase Price for and the Purchase of a 2.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Capacity Right for Desalter Brine G%"dUogenfta np ftem Wl emmnysmnw• 1=111.sawvna"WMRC,r.mM wN.: Wmi Page 2 AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE PURCHASE PRICE FOR, AND THE PURCHASE OF, A 2.0 MGD WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL CAPACITY RIGHT FOR DESALTER BRINE THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this t Ith day of September , 2001, by and between: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public agency, hereinafter referred to as "OCSD"; AND SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, a joint powers public agency, hereinafter referred to as "SAWPA". OCSD and SAWPA are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". RECITALS A. Pursuant to that certain Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement dated July 24, 1996, between the Parties (the "Agreement"), SAWPA possesses an ultimate Treatment and Disposal Right of 30 MGD (as those terms are defined in the Agreement), pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions specified therein; and B. Pursuant to the Agreement, SAWPA has exercised its purchase rights and acquired and presently owns 11 MGD of capacity defined as a Treatment and Disposal Right; and C. SAWPA is presently implementing a new groundwater desalting project and expanding another through the Eastern Municipal Water District. 1 These desalting projects will produce, as a by-product of operation, up to 2 MGD of brine which is proposed to be treated and disposed of under the terms of this Agreement; and D. OCSD has expressed a desire to promote, and participate in, groundwater reclamation in SAW PA's Santa Ana River Interceptor ("SARI") Service Area. In furtherance of that desire, OCSD has previously established a modified Treatment and Disposal Right Charge for wastewater treatment and disposal capacity for desalter brine, as an incentive to the implementation of desalting projects; and E. SAWPA has expressed a desire to purchase an increment of wastewater Treatment and Disposal Right capacity of 2.0 MGD for desalting brine, 1.2 MGD for a new project known as Menifee Desalter and .8 MGD additional capacity for future desalter(s); and F. OCSD has adopted a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge ("CFCC") payable by all dischargers into OCSD's system, which charge is subject to modification from time to time by action of the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows: Section 1: Purchase Price for Brine Caoacl . OCSD and SAWPA hereby acknowledge and agree that SAWPA may, by this Agreement, purchase Treatment and Disposal Right capacity for the disposal of brine generated by groundwater reclamation projects within SAWPA's SARI Service Area, at a price established pursuant to OCSD's current Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, by the following formula: 2 For 1 MGD Assumptions Unit of Measure One-Time Rate Brine Capacity Flow = 1,000,000 Per gallons/day $ 2.39/gpd $2,389,886.55 BOD = 20 mg/L Per pound/day $680.35/#/day $ 113,481.97 SS = 18 mg/L Perpound/day $B16.94/ri/day $ 122,639.11 $2,626,007.63 Application of the foregoing formula generates the purchase price of $2,626,007.63 per each million gallons of capacity as of the date of this agreement. The purchase price for any future purchases of Treatment and Disposal Right capacity shall be determined in accordance with OCSD's then-existing Capital Facilities Capacity Charge and then established loading assumptions as of the date of the future purchase. Section 2: Purchase and Sale of Increment of Capacity. Subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement dated July 24, 1996, except as otherwise expressly provided for in Section 1 herein, OCSD hereby sells, and SAW PA hereby purchases, 2.0 MGD Treatment and Disposal Right, to be utilized solely for the disposal of brine generated by the Menifee Desalter, the future desalter(s), and other groundwater reclamation projects within SAW PA's SARI Service Area. Section 3: Purchase Price. The purchase price of the Treatment and Disposal Right conveyed hereunder shall be $5,252,015.26 based upon the formula set forth in Section 1 above. Section 4: Applicability of 1996 Agreement. OCSD and SAWPA acknowledge and agree that solely because of the nature of the brine discharge, its costs of treatment, and the indirect benefits to OCSD, and the residents of 3 Orange County, a reduced purchase price is appropriate for the Treatment and Disposal Rights which are the subject of this purchase agreement. It is the intent of the parties that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be applicable to the parties and to the brine discharge from SAWPA to the OCSD system. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Chair, Board of Directors By Secretary of the Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By Thomas L. Woodruff S TA ANA ATERSHED PROJECT A ORITY By Chal an a om 'ssion \\lead\datat\wp.dta\tin1210\streed\SAW PA AGREEMENT- 2001 desalter-draft.doc 4 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT September 10, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on September 10, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice-Chair Iry Pickier, Chair Brian Donahue Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Jan Flory,Alternate No. 2 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kelli Burn Roy, Dick Corneille, Bruce Chalmers Brian Brady Wes Bannister - Camp Dresser& McKee Denis Bilodeau Michelle Tuchman, Annette McCluskey Jan Debay - NCG Porter Novelli Staff: Jerry King Debbie Bums- DDB Engineering Jim Herberg Staff: Chris Townsend -Townsend Public Affairs, inc. Lisa Murphy William R. Mills Jr. Steve Tedesco -Tetra Tech Wendy Sevenandt Steve Conklin Ted Popowchak— CH2M Hill Gary Streed Andrew Czomy Greg Halverson — Pinnacle One Tom Dawes Doug Robison—Brown & Caldwell District Counsel: Shivaji Deshmukh Joe Hartge, Bill Vardoulis— BV Engineering Brad Hogin Jill Everhart George Martin - City of Anaheim Cindy Gehman Greg Heiertz, Richard Bell Jenny Glasser — Irvine Ranch Water District Clark Ida Kathy Ryder— URS John Kennedy Ron Young, Dick Pascucci, Jeff Kracht Mike Markus - Malcolm Pimie Mehul Patel John Collins- City of Fountain Valley Cathy Skousen Dennis MacLain—City of Huntington Beach Laura Thomas Ron Wilderrnuth Chairman Iry Pickier called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 10,2001 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Minutes of Meetina Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson, and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meetings held on August 13 and August 27, 2001 were approved as mailed. Director Pickier requested that Agenda Item #6 be first on the agenda schedule. 2. Architectural Conceot/Character and Site Planning of GWR System Facilities (Agenda Item#6) Mr. Dawes introduced Mike Smith, Principal of Hellmuth, Obaya & Kassabaum, Inc., the project architectural fine, who described and presented an architectural concept scale model of the projected facilities for the Groundwater Replenishment System. Director Anthony requested that the architectural concept be brought back to the next meeting for further discussion. 3. Proiect Cost and Financial Model Update Project Coordinator Debra Burris reported on the project cost and financial update for the project. She advised that several major changes have occurred increasing the project costs from the estimated December 2000 dollar amount of$352 million to the current August 2001 estimated capital cost of$367.6 million. Ms. Bums stated that these results raise the estimated average unit water cost from $420/af to $424/af. She reported that more reliable pricing information would be available in May 2002 with a completed 60% design, grant results, and better power price predictions. She also reported that an analysis for building a visitors center and laboratory would be presented at the November JCC meeting. Mr. Dawes noted that the largest increase in capital costs, an estimated $5.4 million, was for the added third party construction management, which originally would have been handled by staff. He also reported that the replenishment assessment (RA) could increase to an estimated $15/af in the year 2010 with the project, versus the earlier estimated $14/af estimated earlier. Both $/af estimates are compared to the anticipated RA level without the GWR project. Director Anderson asked if a traffic study should be completed with the anticipated increase in traffic. Ms. Burris reported that the worse case unit cost, including inflation to the mid-point of construction and using $.065/kWh and a water production rate of 71,600 afy, would be $466/af, which would reflect the highest power cost and lowest water production. She - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 10, 2001 also reported that each $.01/kWh increase in power cost adds about $17/af to the unit water cost. OCWD Finance Director Andrew Czomy reported that OCW D's financial management information system (MIS) software needs to be replaced and stated that OCWD has already allocated funds for the financial hardware and software in Its Replacement and Refurbishment Fund. He noted that the GWR System would incur only the incremental costs for the project's transactional system above the cost for OCW D's new financial system. Mr. Czorny also reported that interest earned on arbitrage from bond sales has not been included in the project cost update and that based on the last seven debt issuances, those arbitrage earnings would probably offset any anticipated increased costs due to inflation. 4. Groundwater Replenishment System Owner-Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) Mr. Dawes reported that the Insurance Subcommittee had interviewed three insurance firms for the Owner-Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) and recommended that staff be authorized to negotiate with Aon Risk Services, Inc. Director Wes Bannister, member of the Insurance Subcommittee, reported that the Insurance Subcommittee consisted of OCWD staff members Andrew Czorny, Jerry White, Mike Markus, Tom Dawes, OCSD Controller Mike White, and OCSD district counsel Tom Woodruff. He gave an overview of their findings that resulted in the selection of Aon Risk Services, Inc. After discussion, Director Eckenrode requested that a JCC Committee member from each agency be added to the Insurance Subcommittee. JCC Chairman Pickler assigned OCSD Director Donahue and OCWD Director Anthony to serve on the Insurance Subcommittee and the following action was taken by Roll Call Vote. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Barr and carried, with Director Eckenrode voting "No," staff is directed to negotiate with Aon Risk Services, Inc. to develop an Owner-Controlled Insurance Program for the GWR System. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Directors Pickier, Anthony, Donahue, Patterson, and Barr Noes: Director Eckenrode 5. Director Communication With Prospective Consultants Mr. Dawes reported that the OCSD Board rejected their Director Communication Disclosure Policy. After lengthy discussion, the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Barr and carried, staff is directed to continue revising the Director Communication Policy and bring a draft back to the Committee for review and recommendation to the OCWD/OCSD - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 10, 2001 Boards for approval. If both OCWD and OCSD Boards do not approve the policy, the policy would not go into effect. 6. Acquisition of Rights-of-Way The Committee concurred that no further discussion was necessary on this item. The following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee recommends that the OCWD/OCSD Boards grant authority to the OCWD General Manager to execute right-of-way acquisition and relocation agreements and other necessary documents in a manner meeting OCWD's General Counsel approval in the aggregate amount of$1.0 million, upon approval of each expenditure by the OCWD/OCSD Joint Cooperative Committee. 7. Public Information and Education Update OCWD Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth distributed an article from the Orange County Register regarding pharmaceuticals in water and reported that no calls have been received to date at either agency regarding the article. He advised that contract negotiations with NCG Porter Novelli would begin next week and introduced Annette McCluskey, NCG Porter Novelli, to the Committee. 8. Construction of GWR System Temporary Offices Mr. Dawes reported that contract documents are being finalized for temporary offices for GWR staff and the construction management team. He stated that OCWD would ask for bids for used trailers, if available, and reported that the OCWD Purchasing staff would procure the office equipment. Director Pickier asked that staff continue to research the possibility of leasing a warehouse-type facility while the bids are being solicited. After discussion, the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried, the following action was taken: A. Recommend that the OCWD/OCSD Boards authorize staff to solicit Bids for Temporary Office Facilities and grant the OCWD Board of Directors authority to award a contract in an amount not to exceed $800,000 to the low bidder and to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount. B. Recommend that the OCWD/OCSD Boards authorize the OCWD General Manager to issue the necessary purchase orders in accordance with the OCWD Purchasing Policy to provide desks, chairs, file cabinets, shelves, computers, and other furnishings and equipment for the Temporary Office Facilities in a total amount not to exceed $300,000. - 4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 10,2001 9. Southern California Edison Substation Discussion of this item was deferred to a later date. 10.Status Reoort Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. An addendum to EIR has been requested by the State Water Resources Control Board for the grant and loan application, which will delay approval of the grant and loan from November 2001 to January 2002. The cost would be less than $20,000. The addendum would have to be approved by the Committee and both Boards. The Committee concurred that staff should proceed with the addendum. B. An extra meeting was requested and was scheduled for September 24 at 5:30 p.m. OCWD General Manager Bill Mills introduced Christopher Townsend, Townsend Public Affairs, Inc., who gave an update on his firm's efforts to procure Prop 13 funds. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, September 24 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. . 5 . c MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT September 24, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on September 24, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice-Chair Phil Anthony Brian Donahue Larry Kraemer Jr. Russell Patterson Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Jan Flory, Alternate No. 2 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kelli Bum Roy, Bruce Chalmers Brian Brady Jan Debay - Camp Dresser& McKee Jerry King Michelle Tuchman, Annette McCluskey, Linda Staff: Staff: Martin - NCG Porter Novelli Blake Anderson William R. Mills Jr. Debbie Burris - DDB Engineering Jim Herberg Tom Dawes Ted Popowchak— CH2M Hill David Ludwin Shivaji Deshmukh Abdul Rashidi, Dave Mosher Lisa Murphy Bill Everest —Montgomery Watson Harza Wendy Sevenandt Jill Everhart Ron Young, Dick Pascucci - Malcolm Pimie Cindy Gehman George Martin - City of Anaheim Clark Ida John Collins -City of Fountain Valley John Kennedy Terry Lane— City of Garden Grove Mike Markus Dennis MacLain—City of Huntington Beach Mehul Patel Greg Heiertz- IRW D Laura Thomas Bill Tappan - Parsons Mike Weimer Vice-Chairman Norm Eckenrode called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion by Director Patterson seconded by Director Anthony and carried,with Director Kraemer abstaining, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on September 10, 2001 were approved as mailed. - 1 - r Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 24,2001 2. Architectural Concept/Character and Site Planning of GWR System Facilities Mr. Dawes introduced Ms. Kellene Bum-Roy, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., who provided an architectural concept update and presentation of the projected facilities for the Groundwater Replenishment System, including traffic and visitor circulation, parking, signage, and neighborhood communication. She reported that future parking spaces would be increased by 45%, (the total now being 255) increasing parking from 113 to 220 spaces located close to the administration building and an additional 150 spaces located throughout the site. She reported that a traffic signal would be installed at Falcon and Ward Streets, which will be the main entrance into the site. Mr. Dawes reported that an exit onto Ellis Avenue would be under direct control only, gated, and mainly for large vehicles, not for normal use of employees. Director Kraemer suggested that a right turn only with a merging lane be made available onto Ellis Avenue to relieve traffic going through the District site to exit at Ellis Avenue. Mr. Dawes stated that there is no room for a merge lane on Ellis Avenue for the right turn only. Mr. Dawes reported that the EIR included traffic analysis and has been formally presented by staff. Mr. John Collins, Fountain Valley Council member, suggested that staff meet with the Fountain Valley Traffic Committee. Ms. Burn-Roy reported that Tetra Tech had completed a traffic study as part of the Project Development Phase, which is included in the site plan layout (DIM 14). Director Anthony suggested that the neighbors be advised of the traffic signal at Ward and Falcon Streets. Ms. Bum-Roy suggested that the neighbors be advised of the project status, construction issues and increased traffic on Ward Street. Mr. Mills stated that an annual open house is held in May of each year and suggested a neighbor meeting be held before then to update neighbors on construction issues. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, 1) approval is given for the architectural concept of the facilities; 2) staff is directed to bring back a more detailed report on the traffic study; and 3) refer neighbor communication to the Public Information and Education Subcommittee and consultant for further action as appropriate. 3. Southern California Edison Substation Ms. Bum-Roy reported on provisions of permanent power for the GWR System. She recommended that both full Boards approve an agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) to design, build and maintain a dual feed 66kV substation for$2,396,000 and $83,000 annual maintenance costs. -2 - '. Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 24, 2001 She reported that the power supply has three major components: 1)dual feed lines into a substation onsite, which will be owned, operated and maintained by SCE; 2)a transformer, which will cost about$1 million in capital costs provided through the GW R System contract and owned and operated by OCWD; and 3) a site power distribution system with a capital cost of$12.5 million. She noted that this package will save the project about$1 million. She reported that the substation will be needed to run the temporary microfiltration and ultraviolet testing units by November 2002, which is critical and time sensitive. If this project does not go forward, the 66kV substation would still be needed for renovation of W F-21. OCWD Engineer Laura Thomas gave an update on the status of the Public Utilities Commission, which limited direct access to contracts with power generators on September 20 for all customers who did not have existing direct access contracts. She reported that OCWD signed a direct access contract on August 24 with AES NewEnergy and power can be purchased starting October 2. She reported that OCWD is a protected direct access customer with a 45-day contract that may roll into a possible three-year contract; we are now in negotiations with AES to extend the contract to the end of 2004. She reported that exit fees will not apply to this contract. Fountain Valley Councilman John Collins asked if noise from the substation or transmission lines would impact the neighborhood. Ms. Thomas responded that they would not. Mr. Collins also asked if OCSD's Central Generation Station could provide energy as a backup for the project. Mr. Blake Anderson said that the Central Generation Station could not produce any excess power for this project. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, authorization was given to prepare an amended agreement with Southern California Edison to design, build, and maintain a dual-feed substation for a total design and construction cost of$2,396,000 and an annual maintenance cost of approximately $83,000 per year, and subject to approval as to form and content by legal counsel and forward to OCWD/OCSD Boards for approval with a provision that at the time the components are purchased the title should be in the name of OCWD and OCSD jointly and title would be tumed over to SCE at completion of construction. OCWD and OCSD will equally split the capital cost of $2,396,000. 4. Authorization to Negotiate Addendum No 4 with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc and Change Order No. 3 with Separation Processes, Inc Mr. Dawes recommends that negotiations for Addendum No. 4 with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. and Change Order#3 with Separation Process, Inc. be approved. He reported that negotiated amendments for cost savings and reliability issues needs to be formalized and will then be brought back to the Committee. - 3 - 4 Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 24, 2001 Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Barr and carried, staff is directed to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement No 201414 with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. and Change Order No. 3 to Task Order No. 201301 with Separation Processes, Inc, for the GWR System. 5. Joint Cooperative Committee Members Communication with Prospective Consultants and Suppliers Mr. Dawes reported that a revised agenda submittal has been distributed. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Donahue seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, with Directors Anthony and Patterson voting "No", staff is directed to submit the Resolution and Policy as follows to the OCWDIOCSD Boards. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Directors Eckenrode, Donahue, Kraemer, and Flory Noes: Directors Anthony and Patterson RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A POLICY PROCEDURE FOR DISCLOSURE OF CONTACTS OR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS, SUPPLIERS,AND CONTRACTORS SEEKING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District("Senftetlon District y, and the Orange County Water District("Water Distdcn,plan to build Phase t of the Groundwater Replenishment System('System. WHEREAS, the Sanitation District and the Water District estimate that the planning, design, development, and construction of Phase I of the System will cost approximately three hundred fifty-two million ($352,000,000);and WHEREAS, in connection with the planning, design, development, and construction of the System, the Joint Cooperative Committee members will make decisions on many millions of dollars in contracts. When a Committee Member receives information from a prospective contractor outside of a public meeting, that information may provide an unfair advantage to the contractor if the information is not shared with other Members of the Committee and the public. The reality or perception of favoritism undermines public confidence in the integrity of the decision-making process;and WHEREAS, the Boards find that the public interest would be best served by adopting the disclosure policy and procedure set forth below. The policy and procedure will promote the -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 24,2001 open, objective, and impartial conduct of the Committee's business, while maintaining the public's opportunity to present views to the Joint Cooperative Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Joint Cooperative Committee members involved with the approval of contracts for the Groundwater Replenishment System shall publicly disclose any communications, including name and date, that they have had with any prospective consultant, supplier or contractor to the Joint Cooperative Committee 12 months prior to voting on an Rem involving said consultant, supplier or contractor. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. A second meeting was requested and scheduled for October 22 at 5:30 p.m. B. The November 12 JCC meeting falls on a national holiday and a new date will be selected and noticed. C. Two letters from the City of Anaheim. D. Received BOR grant allocation of about$700,000. E. Theo Lacy Pipeline is about six weeks from completion and a change order for paving will be needed, but the County will reimburse for the change order. F. GPAC meeting and tour of OCSD on September 25. OCSD Communications Manager Lisa Murphy reported on the following: A. NCG Porter Novelli negotiations are still ongoing. B. CEO letters to hospitals has resulted in Newport Bay Hospital responding for a presentation. C. Will meet with Bill Everest to coordinate public relations with construction events and the neighboring community. D. Received an endorsement from Assemblyman John Campbell and distributed a handout showing endorsements from several MWD member agencies. E. Tracked the Orange County Register website on their pharmaceutical article. 200 hits were made, the largest, compared to the normal of two. No negative calls or e-mails were received. Director Anderson requested clarification be provided of Don Calkins', City of Anaheim, role in writing the letters; is Mr. Calkins representing the City or the groundwater producers with the letters? Mr. George Martin, City of Anaheim, reported that the City Council did not adopt a resolution supporting the project, only a resolution supporting the project moving forward with additional studies. The purpose of the letters was to suggest that the 11 milestones and conditions be resolved before the project continues. Director Anthony suggested that the general managers and GPAC resolve this issue. -5 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 24,2001 Director Carrozzo asked what security measures are being taken now at OCSD and OCWD and in the future. Mr. Dawes reported that a report will soon be brought back to the Committee. Director Flory suggested a Joint Board session be held on this issue. OCWD General Manager Mills reported that OCWD is in the process of developing a vulnerability assessment for security measures. Director King suggested that an emergency plan be developed during construction. Mr. Mills referred to a report that was distributed from Washington Representative Jim McConnell. He reported that we might not be able to keep our goals of getting increased authorization for funding this year. OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the OCSD Board of Directors will be setting a date for a second workshop, an early Saturday in November, on the ocean discharge issues. He reported that there will be a series of five workshops between now and the end of next year leading to an OCSD Board decision upon the ocean discharge permit in November 2002. He reported that OCWD directors will be invited. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjoumed at 6:50 p.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 8 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. -6 - Draft MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT October 8, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on October 8, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice-Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman Brian Donahue Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Guy Carroao, Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin, Altemate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kelli Bum Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille Brian Brady Wes Bannister - Camp Dresser& McKee Paul Walker Denis Bilodeau Michelle Tuchman, Annette McCluskey Staff: Jan Debay - NCG Porter Novell) Blake Anderson Jerry King Debbie Bums - DDB Engineering Jim Herberg Staff: Ted Popowchak—CH2M Hill David Ludwin William R. Mills Jr. Bill Butler, Abdul Rashidi, William Vogel Bob Ooten Tom Dawes —Montgomery Watson Harza Wendy Sevenandt Shivaji Deshmukh Ron Young, Dick Pascucci - Malcolm Pimie Counsel: Bill Everest Bob Finn —Brown & Caldwell Brad Hogin Jill Everhart John Collins—City of Fountain Valley Cindy Gehman Don Calkins, George Martin - City of Anaheim Jenny Glasser Terry Lane— City of Garden Grove Clark Ida Dennis MacLain — City of Huntington Beach John Kennedy Richard Bell - IRWD Mike Markus Dennis Kasper- Parsons Mehul Patel Kathy Ryder- URS Lily Pham Kelly Rowe- KERA Ron Linsky— NWRI Kevin Alexander, Jim Vickers-SPI Chairman Iry Pickier called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. - 11 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes October B,2001 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Minutes of Meeting Mr. George Martin, City of Anaheim suggested that the September 24, 2001 minutes reflect clarification to his statements made at the September 24 meeting as follows: 1) Instead of a resolution supporting the project moving forward by city council that it should have stated that a motion was passed; and 2)the purpose of the letter that was sent was to suggest that the resolution of the 11 milestones and conditions move faster to avoid the project being slowed down at a future date. Upon motion by Director Anthony seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, with Director Pickier abstaining,the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on September 24, 2001 were approved as amended. 2. Microfiltration And Ultraviolet Light Eguioment Pre-Selection Program Manager Tom Dawes introduced OCWD Associate General Manager Bill Everest, who provided an overview on the pre-selection of microfiltration (MF) and ultraviolet (UV) light equipment. Mr. Everest reported on the recommended actions, facilities overview, life cycle cost components, timetable for implementation, and pre-selection document components and technical issues. He reported that to keep with water delivery dates for December 2005, microfiltration equipment procurement is on a critical path. He reported that the microfiltration equipment Request for Proposals (RFP)will be sent to three manufacturers, Pall, Zenon, and US Filter/Memoor, and will include a specific membrane warranty that if the membrane does not last the specified amount of time, the manufacturer will pay the difference in the replacement. He noted that there will be two separate contracts for design services and two separae contracts for construction and that financial obligations will be staggered over the next couple of years. He reported only fixed engineering design estimates of$500,000 for MF and $250,000 for UV will be allowed in the initial contracts. Mr. Dawes reported that the fixed estimates for engineering equipment design are locked in so that the manufacturers cannot frontioad their contract. He reported that the design work is a requirement of the specifications and is a progress pay, which is the fixed estimate amount. He noted that the manufacturer will not be paid until the design work is complete, that the contract will encompass both the design and purchase, and that the microfiltration units will not be built until they are assigned to the advanced water treatment contractor. OCW D General Counsel Clark Ids stated that provisions have been put in place in the RFP so that we are not obligated to purchase $32 million of MF equipment if the project does not proceed, but the manufacturer would only receive design costs. - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes October 8,2001 Mr. Dawes requested that the Committee grant authority to send the RFPs to the three manufacturers and that the proposals would be brought back to the Committee for their approval. Ms. Kelly Bum-Roy stated that the six action items are being requested to expedite award of the contract since microfiltration is the critical path item microfiltration and that the OCWD and OCSD Boards will see the results of the proposals. She noted that to expedite moving forward with the award, staff is asking for pre-approval to award the contract if it falls within certain budgetary estimates. Director Anthony clarified that pre- selection and pre-approval are being requested. Director Bilodeau noted that the MF white paper states only two manufacturers may propose and asked why. Mr. Everest responded that requirements to participate in the testing program were that the manufacturers offer the same equipment that was formally demonstration tested last year. He reported that Zenon has stated that their technology has changed since last November and they would like to offer a different type of unit. He reported that staff has reviewed their proposal and met with Zenon, and staffs conclusion is that the alternative equipment is not considered equal equipment and there is no assurance that the equipment would perform the same as the demonstration tested unit. He also noted that Zenon has stated they have not yet manufactured the altemative membrane unit, so on that basis, staff is standing firm on the design criteria requirements. An RFP will still be sent to Zenon. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Donahue and carried, the Committee recommends that the Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District, with concurrence of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District approve: A. Issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) for pre-selection of microfiltration equipment (estimated cost of$32,500,000, equally shared by OCWD and OCSD), subject to final approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel. B. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the selected MF equipment manufacturer to provided engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$500,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD. C. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to assign the value of the microfiltration equipment to the contract to install the temporary MF system and to the main contract to - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes October 8, 2001 install the permanent MF system, based on the selected manufacturer proposal, for a total estimated capital cost of$32,000,000. D. Issuance of RFP for pre-selection of ultraviolet light equipment(estimated capital cost of$10,250,000, equally shared by OCWD and OCSD), subject to approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel. E. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the selected UV equipment manufacturer to provided engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD. F. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet disinfection equipment to the contract to install the demonstration UV system and to the main contract to install the permanent UV equipment, based on the selected manufacturer proposal, for a total estimated capital cost of$10,000,000. 3. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and The Green Acres Project Mr. Dawes reported that the GWR System 0&M Agreement has been work in progress for the past four years and options have been discussed during that time. He introduced OCSD District Counsel Brad Hogin who gave an overview of the agreement. The agreement includes recitals that assist in interpretations of the agreement. The agreement will superoede existing agreements, the Cooperative Agreement and the Wastewater Utilization Agreement. Other sections of the agreement specify provisions for planning, design, and construction; financing/ownership; governance of activities; OCW D's and OCSD's obligations for operation and maintenance; term and termination; default; indemnities; successors; and arbitration. The Committee requested the following be incorporated into the O&M Agreement: A. Termination after construction commences. How does Lacy Pipeline fit as construction has already commenced? B. Reasonable timeframe for negotiations to resolve disputes; C. Timeframe for negotiations on defaults; D. Section 38 -Address "guaranteed"capability to handle wet weather flow requirements (100 mod); E. Need indemnity clause, adding Committee members and Directors; F. Consider arbitration alternatives; and G. Replace or delete "possible" liability from page 15. section 53 of Agreement Mr. Mills reported that the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee will review the agreement at a special GPAC meeting on Wednesday, October 10 at 9:30 a.m. -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes October 8, 2001 After discussion, Chairman Pickier directed staff and counsel to revise the Agreement and bring this item back to the next meeting. 4. Contract No. GWRS-2001-1 Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline And Lacv Parking Facility (L.H. Woods & Sons Inc.): Change Orders Nos. 1 2 3 & 4 Mr. Dawes introduced Mike Markus, OCWD Associate General Manager who gave a brief overview of the change orders. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Barr and carried, staff is directed to issue Change Orders for Contract No. GWRS-2001-1, to L.H. Woods for the GWR Pipeline and Lacy Jail Facility for: A. Nos. 1, 2, & 3 for a contract price increase totaling $7,984.57 and no time extension; and B. No. 4 for a contract price increase of $61,971.62 and no time extension. Agendize for October 17 OCWD Board meeting. 5. Public Information and Education Update Ms. Cindy Gehman, OCWD Public Affairs Specialist, gave an update on public information activities. She also reported that negotiations with NCG Porter Novelli have been competed and that the results of the negotiated contract will go to the October 17 OCWD Board, has been previously approved by OCSD Board and will be brought back to the Committee as an informational item. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. With Committee concurrence the November JCC meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 14 at 9:30 a.m. B. A Joint Board Workshop is proposed for Saturday, November 17 from 8:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m. 7. General Managers Report OCWD General Manager Bill Mills reported that an economic stimulus package and an opportunity to include some construction for this project may be allocated in a federal grant program with conditions that we have to be in construction within three months after the bill is passed. OCWD General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the second workshop on ocean outfall discharge issues will be on Saturday, November 3 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at OCSD. - 5 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes October 8, 2001 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. The next regular Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 22 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 6 - d.BOARD OF DIRECTORS meeeg Date toe /01 r. lad.of l AGENDA REPORT Item Numher Item5(c) 1Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 DIRECTOR COMMUNICATION WITH PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-19, Establishing a Policy and Procedure for Disclosure of Contacts or Communications Between the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Members and Prospective Consultants, Suppliers, and Contractors Bidding for Work in Connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System. SUMMARY • At the JCC meetings of July 9 and September 10, 2001, a draft policy regarding contacts between Board members and prospective Consultants and Suppliers was reviewed and discussed. • During the September 10, 2001 meeting, Staff was directed to simplify the proposed policy. • The revised policy and resolution was discussed at the September 24, 2001 JCC meeting and recommended for approval by both Boards of Directors. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This item has no financial impact. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.9, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This action does not require any expenditure of budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the September 24, 2001 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. \VNtlWIe1Wq.ONNponN`PopN Aaeft Rgwd lB4 AWd.PaC?'If11C01\IUAWRS drKW C nl Uw.dw R.Hw da 1 Page 1 ALTERNATIVES Not adopting the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommendation. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS September 24, 2001, JCC Agenda Item Submittal Re: Director Communication with Prospective Consultants and Suppliers Proposed Resolution No. OCSD 01-19 WS:jak \Vome.uny euuoMaaaaaro�9n]a Repwtf2W mw npenae Re0Tfi1 W 15 c Gwrss Ov1us[gmunoum Ea Page 2 Revised Agenda Item#5 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: September 24, 2001 Budgeted: N/A Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS COMMUNICATION WITH PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIERS SUMMARY At the regular Committee meetings of July 9 and September 10, 2001, a communications policy for disclosing contact between prospective consultants and suppliers and Committee members was discussed. During the September 10 meeting, staff was directed to simplify the proposed policy. A new policy has been prepared for Committee review. RECOMMENDATION Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Consider adopting policy regarding Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee communication with prospective consultants and suppliers. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS Attached EeAewiag is a graft Policy and Resolution for consideration regarding communications between JCC members and consultants, suppliers or contractors seeking work on the GWR System: DRAFT RAL1GY rGR LSOMM147ME AilClyIRER CQtITACTR ANITH PRQSZPCrTIwr CONS;' 11 TANTS AN[) S P121 ICGQ FOR THE GRO INDWATLO rJCDI rAllk IMENT- QVOTCAII 0 nrluding Fiame and date, that they hays had with any PFOspeGlive Gensultant eF supplier to PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: July 9 and September 10, 2001. - 1 - RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-19 ESTABLISHING A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR DISCLOSURE OF CONTACTS OR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS, SUPPLIERS, AND CONTRACTORS BIDDING FOR WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A POLICY PROCEDURE FOR DISCLOSURE OF CONTACTS OR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND PROSPECTIVE CONSULTANTS, SUPPLIERS, AND CONTRACTORS BIDDING FOR WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District plan to build Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System ("System"); and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the planning, design, development, and construction of Phase I of the System will cost approximately Three Hundred Fifty-Two Million ($352,000.00) Dollars; and WHEREAS, in connection with the planning, design, development, and construction of the System, the Joint Cooperative Committee Members will make decisions on many millions of dollars in contracts. When a Committee Member receives information from a prospective consultant, supplier, or contractor outside of a public meeting, that information may provide an unfair advantage to the consultant, supplier, or contractor if the information is not shared with other Members of the Committee and the public. The reality or perception of favoritism undermines public confidence in the integrity of the decision-making process; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that the public interest would be best served by adopting a disclosure policy and procedure. The policy and procedure will promote the open, objective, and impartial conduct of the Committee's business, while maintaining an opportunity for the public to present views to the Joint Cooperative Committee. wss-TLw:y:D-3:iamai:ia2se9 1 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Joint Cooperative Committee Members involved with the approval of contracts for the Groundwater Replenishment System shall publicly disclose any communications, including name and date, that they have had with any prospective consultant, supplier, or contractor, to the Joint Cooperative Committee twelve (12) months prior to voting on an item involving said consultant, supplier, or contractor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 24, 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary wss-11wyl:na:lanro1:142eae 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.or[W. SO/29/01 AGENDA REPORT item Number Item5(d) 1Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF A 66/12KV SUBSTATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement between Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Southern California Edison, to design, build, and maintain a dual-feed 66/12kV substation in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, for a total cost of$2,396,000, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) having equal shares in the amount of$1,198,000 for the capital costs, and with OCWD having sole responsibility for the annual maintenance cost of approximately $83,000 per year. SUMMARY • At the August 13, 2001 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) meeting, Staff presented a proposal to install a dual feed 66/12kV substation instead of the original design, which consisted of a temporary power supply during construction, and a single power feed and standby generation for permanent facilities. • The OCWD and the OCSD would realize net savings of$525,500 compared to the December 2000 Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System budget. • The JCC authorized Staff to negotiate with Southern California Edison (SCE)for the design, construction, and maintenance of the substation. • The negotiated cost for the design and construction is $2,396,000. The agreement includes on-going maintenance costs of approximately $83,000 per year. • OCSD and OCWD will have equal shares in the amount of$1,198,000 for the capital cost. The annual maintenance cost will be the sole responsibility of OCWD. • At the September 24, 2001 JCC meeting, the JCC recommended approval of the agreement by OCWD and OCSD Boards of Directors. " ..^, e 1 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$1,198,000 from the construction contract budget is requested for the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) 50%cost share, as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. OCWD would be responsible for 100 % of the ongoing maintenance costs. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. a, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the September 24, 2001 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES An alternative is to have an independent consultant design the substation, and bid the work to a General Contractor. Southern California Edison (SCE) can design and build the substation to their codes and requirements more efficiently and at less cost than the alternative method. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. September 24, 2001 JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: SCE Substation WTS:jak:jo Weed\datai\wpAtatagenda\Boand Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda Reporte\1001\15A.SCEsubstation agreement.doc 5i iie :SW, Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 a . to I'• .'� � 1 . „t,. _ Project Oevalo ment 8 700.000 $ 4,000 S 4,000 f 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100% 51udlas*emhIln • 4.000.000 $ 4.000.000 $ 4P0004000 S 4,000,000 $ 4.00D,000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7.500.000 If 18.400.000 $ 18,400,000 )� $ 18,158,334 $ 18.158.334 $ 500,OOD 3% Dell nStafi I$ 2,349,000 E 1,349.000 1 E 1,348,000 I� $ 1,049,000 $ 1,N9,o00 $ 450,000 33% Comlructiun Contract $ 86.481,500 S 137,500.000 5137.500,000 'I $ 5,127,600 $ L798.000 $ 6.325,50D S 0% Construction Administration $ 2,883,900 $ 6.021,000 $ 6.021.000 $ $ $ O% Construction Inspection $ 9,345,600 If 326,000 $ 328.000 i $ $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 15.100.000 $ 15,100.000 $ If - $ 0% J' PROJECTTOTAL I S 121,925,000 $ 102700,000 f - $182,700,000 1 $ 28,638.834 $ 1.198,000 $ 29,836,834 $ 4,954,000 17% Relmbursable Costs S -Is 28.000,000 $ 28,000,000 $ 750,OOD PROJECTNET $ 121,925.000 $ 164,700.000 111 -1 If154,700,001) $ 28.630.834 $ 1,195.000 $ 29.836.834 $ 4,204.000 1 14% •Funds authorized to date includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning far the Oroundwaler Replenishment System with the Orange County Water Olelrict "Funds authorized to data Include Pipeline at Thoo Lary Jall.SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities.agreement coals and easemards. O1wp.dle%ngUO05 8 CONTRACTSU-M[I-38 budget table 10.24.01ace substation agreement.ablsce OCSO Confidential am Page 1 Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: September 24, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWDIOCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $2.4 Million From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes, Laura Thomas Subject: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SUBSTATION SUMMARY At the August 13 JCC meeting, staff presented a proposal to install a dual-feed 66 kilovolt (kV)/12kV substation instead of the original design which consisted of a temporary power supply during construction, a single-feed substation, and standby generation for permanent facilities. At the August 13 meeting, the JCC authorized staff to negotiate with Southern California Edison (SCE) for the design, construction, and maintenance of the dual-feed substation. Since that time, staff has reviewed the SCE cost proposal and determined that it would be more cost effective to have SCE design, build, and maintain the substation, but for the Districts to purchase and install the substation transformers separate from the SCE contract. Based on this revised approach, the Districts would realize a net savings of approximately $525,500 over the December 2000 GW R System budget. The estimated capital cost for SCE to design and construct the dual-feed substation is $2,396,000. The capital cost will be equally split between OCWD and OCSD. The ongoing annual maintenance cost for the SCE substation is approximately $83,000 per year, $79,000 less than budgeted. Approximately 70% of the capital cost of the substation would be required upon execution of the contract with SCE. The remaining 30% would be due at the start of construction. RECOMMENDATION Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Authorize an agreement with Southern California Edison to design, build and maintain a dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation for a total design and construction cost of $2,396,000 and an annual maintenance cost of - 1 - Agenda Item#3 approximately $83,000 per year, subject to approval as to form and content by OCWD General Counsel. OCWD and OCSD will equally split the capital cost of$2,396,000. Agendize for October 3 OCWD Board meeting and the October 24 OCSD Board meeting. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The original GWR System electrical power supply design included three components: a 12kV/2.4kV temporary substation to supply power during construction, a new 66kV/12kV single feed substation, and five 2000kW backup generators with fuel systems. Since this original design concept was accepted last December, the reliability issues were analyzed in more detail, and it was determined that installation of a dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation would eliminate the need for on-site backup generation. In addition, Southern California Edison (SCE) recently informed OCWD staff that there is insufficient capacity on its existing 12kV distribution system to support the temporary substation loads during construction. To meet the original design intent, the Districts would now be required to pay an additional $1,100,000 to support infrastructure improvements to the SCE 12kV distribution system for a temporary power supply. Therefore, to implement the original design concept, the estimated cost would increase from the budgeted amount of$3,917,000 to $5,017,000, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 Estimate for Implementation of Original Electrical Power Supply Plan Description Estimated Total Capital Cost Original Budget December 2000 Interim Power $846,000 On-Site Backup Generation $2,921,000 Single Feed 66kV/12kV substation $150,000 Original Budget Total December 2000 $3 917,000 New SCE Supply Charge for Temporary Power $1.100.000 New Total Current Cost for Power Supplyjanqinal concept) $5,017,000 Because of this additional cost, in August staff recommended elimination of this temporary 12kV/2.4kV substation and recommended proceeding with the design and construction of a permanent dual-feed 66kV/12kV SCE substation now to supply both the temporary power needs (during construction of the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities) and long-term site power needs. The estimated capital cost for the dual-feed substation presented at the August 13, 2001 Committee meeting was $3,587,000 which included the substation and -2 - Agenda Item #3 associated transformers, all by SCE. Since that time, we have reviewed the transformer capacity and believe it would be more economical to install the transformers under the Districts' site power distribution construction contract, rather than including them in SCE's substation contract. This change reduces the SCE substation cost to $2,396,000. As shown in Table 2, this alternative can now be provided for a total of $3,391,500. This total cost includes $2,396,000 for the SCE dual-feed substation, plus approximately $995,500 for transformers that would be installed by the Districts as part of the site power distribution construction contract. Table 2 Estimate for Dual-Feed 66kV/12kV Substation Description Estimated Total Capital Cost Dual-Feed 66kV/12kV Substation by SCE $2,396.000 Transformers and associated 12kV switchrack (owned by and $ 995.500 installed separately by the Districts as part of the site power distribution construction contract Total Cost for Power Supply (dual-feed substation) $3,391,500 Table 3 presents a cost analysis showing that the Districts would realize a net savings of $525,500 over the original (December 2000) budget by proceeding now with the design and construction of the permanent SCE dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation. Furthermore, the Districts would not have to pay the $1,100,000 SCE charge for temporary power by not implementing the original power supply concept. Table 3 Estimated Savings Description Estimated Total Capital Cost Current Cost for Original Electrical Power Supply Plan $5,017,000 Total Cost for Dual-Feed Substation Power Supply $3,391,500 Estimated Total Savings (current cost for original concept vs. $1,625,500 recommended dual-feed substation Less New SCE Supply Charge for Temporary Power (eliminated $1,100.000 with recommended dual-feed substation Estimated Net Savings compared with December 2000 $525,500 budget SCE has indicated that the design and construction of the dual-feed substation will be completed within 12 to 14 months from receipt of a contract. The substation, with the exception of the two transformers, would be owned and operated by SCE. - 3 - Agenda Item #3 Approximately 70% of the cost of the dual-feed substation would be required upon execution of the contract with SCE. The remaining 30% would be due at the start of construction. The annual maintenance cost for the dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation would be approximately $83,000 per year. Table 4 shows the annual maintenance cost estimated at about half that of the original electrical power supply plan, mostly due to eliminating the backup generators. The annual savings for on-going maintenance associated with the dual-feed substation is estimated at $79,000 per year. Table 4 Yearly Maintenance Cost Impacts Original Approach On-site Backup Generation $95,000 (Yearly Maintenance Cost Single Feed 66kV/12kV Substation $67.000 Added Facilities Cha e Total Original Approach $162,000 Modified Approach Dual-Feed 66kV/12kV Substation $83.000 Added Facilities Charges) Estimated Yearl Maintenance Savings $79,000 In summary, the dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation concept provides the highest reliability possible and eliminates the need for emergency standby generators. The estimated capital cost for SCE to design and construct the dual-feed substation is $2,396,000. The net savings for SCE to design and construct a dual-feed substation is estimated at $525,500 (as compared to the original December 2000 budget). As a secondary benefit, the dual-feed substation results in elimination of on-going charges to maintain the standby generator equipment and an overall annual maintenance savings of approximately $79,000 per year. With regard to our power supplier, it should be noted that contracting with SCE to design and construct the dual-feed 66kV/12kV substation does not lock the Districts into buying power from SCE. We still plan to contact various energy service providers next year as the market stabilizes and our power demands are firm. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS August 13, 2001 —Authority to negotiate with SCE. -4 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeetlngDate T l3d.ofwn AGENDA REPORT Item Number I[em5(e) 1NU Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO.J-36, MICROFILTRATION AND ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)(a) Authorize issuance of Request for Proposals for pre-selection of microfiltration (MF) equipment estimated at a cost of$32,500,000 to be equally shared by the Orange County Water District(OCWD), and the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD), subject to Final approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel; (1)(b) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the MF equipment manufacturer to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$500,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD; and, (1)(c) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the MF equipment to the contract to install the temporary MF system and to the main contract to install the permanent MF system based on the selected vendor proposal with a total estimated capital cost of$32,000,000. (2)(a) Authorize issuance of Request for Proposals for pre-selection of ultraviolet light(UV) equipment estimated at a capital cost of$10,250,000 to be equally shared by OCWD and OCSD, subject to approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel; (2)(b) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the UV equipment manufacturer to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD; and, (2)(c) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV equipment based on the selected vendor proposal with a total estimated capital cost of$10,000,000. SUMMARY • Staff and our consulting team have prepared contract documents to pre-select MF equipment and UV equipment for Phase I of the Groundwater Replenishment System. • Pre-selection allows us to finalize the design of the Advanced Water Treatment Plant(AWT) Facilities for specific equipment, since the AWT Facilities must be designed around the selected equipment. R.O. e e Page 1 • The equipment supply contracts will be assigned to the temporary facilities construction contractor and the permanent facilities construction contractor scheduled for award in the Spring of 2002 and Spring of 2003, respectively. • The recommended action was approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee on October 8, 2001. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached budget information table. Authorization of expenditure of funds is only for engineering documents at this time. Two agreements are proposed for award for a total value of$750,000. Authorization of expenditures for the equipment, estimated at a value of $42,500,000, will be requested with the award of the construction contracts in the future. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. 8,page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached October 8, 2001 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal concentrating on the procurement methods recommended for the microfiltration and ultraviolet equipment. Attached to this report are two"white papers"which provide greater detail. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to issuing a proposal for pre-selection of the equipment included pre-purchase of the equipment or preparing final designs for all equipment options. Pre-purchase of the equipment was not selected to reduce liability to the agencies and place liability for the equipment on the Contractor. With substantial differences in each equipment design, preparing final designs for each manufacturer was determined to be cost prohibitive. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District Boards of Directors on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. October 8, 2001 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Microffltration and Ultraviolet Light Equipment Pre-selection. 3. Two white papers describing the process in more detail. JDH:jo:jak GA.p.db\agenda\Bwrd Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda Repels\1001\15.e.mf u,dw a W:aamae Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 y ram@ '' T f 1 I! Y , 8 i o _ EDTO A Y� 'D 11y'�p'N,;' -IVORI�A71ON ' P EX PEN r C P PO D. 11 !; ,. `� N . f' � I 70 D Project Development $ 700000 $ 4,000 $ 4.000 ,i $ 4,000 $ 4.000 $ 4.000 1 SludieslPerm08 • 4,000.000 $ 4,000.000 $ 4,0D0.000 $ 4,00D,000 $ 4DDD000 1 ConsuBant PSA• $ 7.5000D0 $ 18400000 $ 18.400000 $ 18.158.334 S 18,158,334 $ 500000 Oesl n Staff $ 2,349,000 $ 7 349.000 $ 1 349.000 ;:; $ 1.349.000 $ 1.349.000 $ 450.000 Constructbn Contract $ 86.487500 $ 137,500,000 $ 137.500000 $ 6325500 S 376000 $ 6,700,500 $ 0% Construction Administration $ 2.653,900 $ 6.021.000 $ 6.021.000 ''; $ $ - $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 9345.600 $ 326.000 $ 326.000 $ $ - $ 0% I� Contingency Contlngency $ 12.895.000 $ 15.100,000 $ 15,100.000 !~ $ $ - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 182.700.000 $ - $ 182,700.000 SAS. $ 29,836,834 $ 375,000 $ 30.211.834 $ 4,954,000 16% Reimbursable Costs 1$ -IS 28.000.000 I. $ 28.000,000 ` 1 $ 750.000 PROJECT NET $ 121.925,000 $ 154,700.000 $' - $ 154.700.000 ;" $ 29.836.83C $ 376,000 $ 30.211.834 1 $ 4,204,000 14% -Funds authorized to data Includes multiple contracts issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds authorized to data include Pipeline at Theo Lecy Jail,SCE substation oonebuctbn,temporary office facilities,agreement and easement costs,and mf/uv engineering documents from epuipment vendom. G:1wp.dtalengU0BS 8 CONTRACTSU-36%0-36 budget table 10-24-01 mf uv prese1ection.dsjm4uv OCSD Confidential mf-uv Page 1 Agenda Item #2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: October 8, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $42.8 million From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: In Process Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Bill Everest, Mehul Patel Subject: MICROFILTRATION AND ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION SUMMARY Staff and our consulting team have prepared contract documents to pre-select microfiltration (MF) equipment and ultraviolet light (UV) equipment. Pre-selection allows us to finalize the design of the Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWn Facilities for specific equipment. We will not buy the equipment now or in the near future. The majority of the equipment supply contracts will be assigned to the AWT construction contract, scheduled for award in the Spring of 2003. At the meeting, we will brief you on pre-selection contract issues, highlights of the pre-selection documents, and the timetable for procurement. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: A. Authorize issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) for pre-selection of microfiltration equipment (estimated cost of $32,500,000, equally shared by OCWD and OCSD), subject to final approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel. B. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the selected MF equipment manufacturer to provided engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$500,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD. C. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to assign the value of the microfiltration equipment to the contract to install the temporary MF system and to the main contract to install the permanent Agenda Item #2 MF system, based on the selected manufacturer proposal, for a total estimated d capital cost of$32,000,000. D. Authorize issuance of RFP for pre-selection of ultraviolet light equipment (estimated capital cost of $10,250,000, equally shared by OCWD and OCSD), subject to approval as to form and content by OCWD and OCSD General Counsel. E. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to award a contract between OCWD and the selected UV equipment manufacturer to provided engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and OCSD. F. That the Board of Directors of the OCSD grant authority to the Board of Directors of the OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet disinfection equipment to the contract to install the demonstration UV system and to the main contract to install the permanent UV equipment, based on the selected manufacturer proposal, for a total estimated capital cost of$10,000,000. Agendize for October 17 OCWD Board meeting and the October 24 OCSD Board meeting. BACKGROUND On July 30, 2001, your Committee was briefed on technical issues regarding the GWR System treatment process and alternative methods of equipment procurement for MF and UV equipment. This report concentrates on the procurement methods recommended for the MF and UV equipment. Attached to this report are two "white papers' which provide greater detail. 1. MF Equipment The MF equipment is sized to treat OCSD secondary effluent and provide 86 mgd of filtrate (100 mgd in wet weather) as pretreatment for the reverse osmosis (RO) facilities. Three manufacturers have been pre-qualified based on pilot testing (100- 450 gpm) at Water Factory 21 (WF-21) during April to November 2000: • US Filter/Memcor — CMF-S in-basin system • Pall — in-vessel system • Zenon — in-basin system The MF design is by Separation Processes, Inc. (SPI), under contract to OCWD, with oversight and coordination by the CDM team. Preparation of the MF pre- selection documents was initiated in May 2001 and is now complete. - 2 - Agenda Item #2 0 2. UV Light Equipment The UV equipment for the GWR System will serve two main functions. One function is for disinfection to meet Title 22 Reclamation Criteria. The second function is for the removal of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Originally, the basis for the UV system design was for disinfection. The recent emergence of NDMA has now shifted the design basis to removal of this compound. NDMA removal requires a much higher level of UV treatment than is necessary for disinfection. We estimate that NDMA removal requires three to four times the level of treatment and power necessary for disinfection. The design criteria for NDMA removal for the GWR System UV process is to reduce concentrations from 150 parts per trillion (ppt) down to 10 ppt. The current California Department of Health Services (DHS) NDMA standard is 20 ppt. The criteria were chosen based on an estimated maximum NDMA concentration in secondary effluent of 300 ppt reduced to 150 ppt by the RO process. (RO is capable of 50% removal of NDMA). DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS Procurement Specifications There are two traditional methods of equipment procurement: an equipment specification and a performance specification. The primary difference between an equipment specification and a performance specification is the determination of the amount of equipment necessary to meet the design criteria for a given project. An equipment specification has the purchaser of the equipment specify the amount of equipment. The responsibility for making sure the amount of equipment supplied is sufficient to meet design criteria rests on the purchaser. A performance specification calls for the manufacturer to determine what amount of equipment is necessary and to guarantee the performance for the equipment (usually through a performance bond) to meet design criteria. The MF equipment will be procured using an equipment specification, while the UV equipment will be procured using a performance specification. The MF process is well understood compared to UV process due to years of testing at WF-21, including the six-month MF demonstration period, making an equipment specification appropriate for the MF equipment. On the other hand, the destruction of NDMA by UV processes is quite new and there is a lack of widespread available knowledge. It is this lack of knowledge that makes a performance specification the ideal procurement method for the UV equipment. The UV manufacturers will be required to guarantee the specified NDMA removal rate as well as the energy usage. Both the MF and UV equipment procurement will each involve three separate contracts. The MF equipment procurement will include the following three contracts: 1. Temporary and permanent MF system engineering (shop drawingstlayout preparation) 2. Temporary MF system (6 mgd) - 3 - Agenda Item #2 3. Permanent MF system (80 mgd) s The first contract is between OCWD and the MF equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $500,000 in the MF proposal document. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to prepare the work required to design the facilities necessary for the selected MF system. The contract for the temporary MF system will be assigned to the general contractor chosen to install the temporary MF system and will be limited to 10% of the cost of the permanent MF system (estimated to be $3,000,000). The contract for the permanent MF system will be assigned to the AWr general contractor and is estimated at$29,000.000. The UV equipment procurement will include the fallowing three contracts: 1. Demonstration and permanent UV system engineering (shop drawingstlayout preparation) 2. Demonstration UV system (5 mgd) 3. Permanent UV system (65 mgd) The first contract is between OCWD and the UV equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $250,000 in the UV proposal document. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to prepare the work required to design the facilities necessary for the selected UV system. The contract for the demonstration UV system will be assigned to a general contractor and will be limited to 10% of the cost of the 65 mgd UV system equipment. (If the schedule permits this contract may be assigned to the temporary MF system installation contractor.) The contract for the permanent UV system will be assigned to the AWr general contractor and is estimated at $10,000,000. Microfil ration Equipment Both the temporary and permanent MF systems will be provided by the same manufacturer, and will be included together in the pre-selection documents. The temporary MF system (6 mgd) will be used to feed WF-21 during Phase 1 demolition and construction, and will be relocated and included in the permanent MF system (total of 86 mgd) as RO pretreatment for the GWR System. The permanent MF equipment layout has been refined to include the additional units, while maintaining the overall rectangular geometry. The MF equipment manufacturers will be asked to provide prices for the following items in the procurement proposal: • Temporary MF equipment capital cost • Permanent MF equipment capital cost • Total MF system cost • Membrane Replacement Price • Membrane Module Replacement Warranty Period -4 - Agenda Item #2 4 The basis of award will be the lowest present worth life cycle cost of equipment, membrane replacement, power usage, and chemical consumption. The following criteria have been adopted in the basis of the present worth life cycle cost analysis: • Interest rate 6% • Cost recovery period 25 years • Energy cost 6Yz cents/kwh • Chemicals Market rate The membrane warranty for the MF system will follow a pro-rated (also known as "pro-rata") approach. The MF manufactures will provide a 5-year modified pro-rated warranty and if the manufacturer decides to offer a longer warranty up to 10-years maximum, the membrane price is based upon the 5-year replacement value. The warranty structure that is provided by membrane manufacturers on typical membrane filtration projects is a "pro-rata" warranty. This type of approach has been used for most membrane applications due to the MF supplier and purchaser not having enough operational experience to accurately project a real membrane replacement interval. In the "pro-rata" warranty approach, OCWD will purchase the membrane and the MF supplier will give a membrane replacement cost and duration. If a membrane fails during the warranty duration, the manufacturer pays for the replacement value of the unused duration in a linearly pro-rated cost based on the membrane replacement price offered by the MF supplier. The MF procurement process will proceed using the following schedule: October 2001 — Send proposal documents to MF manufacturers December 2001 — Receive proposals from MF manufacturers January 2002 —Award contract to pre-selected MF manufacturer January 2002 -August 2002 — Engineering for MF system design August 2002 - March 2003 —Temporary MF construction August 2003 - November 2005—AWT construction UV Light Equipment The pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer will be required to provide a 5 mgd demonstration UV system. This system will be delivered prior to delivery of the permanent system. The demonstration system will be used with product water generated from the interim WF-21 operation. The demonstration UV system is necessary for two main reasons. One is that it will allow the GWR System staff and the UV manufacturer to determine if their proposed design performs as was specified in the proposal, for both NDMA destruction and disinfection. Second, the demonstration UV system is necessary for California Department of Health Services certification. All UV systems installed to meet Title 22 Reclamation Criteria require DHS certification. The UV manufacturer must perform all necessary tests required for DHS certification prior to installation of the full system. The UV manufacturer will - 5 - Agenda Item #2 be required to design the demonstration system so that it can be incorporated into s the full plant. The UV equipment pre-selection will be based on a present worth life cycle cost analysis. The present worth life cycle cost analysis will consist of the following: • Capital cost • Power • Lamp replacement price • Ballast replacement price • Lamp replacement interval The basis of award will be the lowest annualized life cycle cost. The following criteria have been adopted in the basis of the present worth life cycle cost analysis: Interest rate 6% Cost recovery period 25 years Energy cost 6%:cents/kwh In a similar manner to the membranes supplied for the MF facility, the UV lamp life and the periodic lamp replacement are an important consideration in determining the life cycle costs of the various UV configurations. Two basic types of UV lamps can be supplied by the manufacturers: medium pressure (MP) and low pressure-high output (LPHO). MP installations require fewer lamps; however, the lamps are more expensive and require more frequent replacement. Both types of tamps have been in service at multiple locations for several years and their anticipated life is generally established. The manufacturers will determine the lamp cost and lamp life for the fife cycle cost in the proposal to the District. The MP lamps will be required to be warranted by the manufacturer for 3000 hours (pro rate) and the LPHO lamps for 8000 hours (pro rata). A UV manufacturer will be allowed to indicate a longer lamp life if the warranty is provided for the longer life. The manufacturers will not be allowed to indicate a lamp life greater than two times the stipulated minimum values. The UV procurement process will proceed using the following schedule: November 2001 —Send proposal documents to UV manufacturers January 2002 — Receive proposals from UV manufacturers February 2002 —Award contract to pre-selected UV manufacturer February 2002 -August 2002 — Engineering for UV system design March 2003 -January 2004 — Demonstration testing on 5 mgd UV system August 2003-November 2005 —AWr construction PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS Discussed from time to time under the Project Development Phase. Technical aspects discussed in detail at July 30, 2001 committee meeting. -6 - MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT White Paper PRESELECTION OF MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM This White Paper is prepared to provide additional background information on particular issues important to the program for pre-selection of microfiltration (MF) equipment for the GWR System. The following topics are addressed in the White Paper: • Pre-Qualified Manufacturers • Benefits of Equipment—Specification Procurement • Manufacturer Issues—Alternative Equipment • Manufacturer Issues — Membrane Life • Life Cycle Cost Analysis Components Pre-Qualified Manufacturers The size and capacity requirements of the GWR System makes it necessary to eliminate those membrane systems that do not have large capacity municipal or commercial installations (greater than 10 mgd), since smaller systems would pose an unacceptable risk when such systems are scaled up for the GWR System. Large-scale applications also establish a cost threshold that is not achievable with small systems. Membrane systems with successful large-scale operations representative of GWR System are: • Koch (Fluid Systems) • Aquasource • Pall • US Filter/Memcor • Zenon Bench and pilot testing at OCWD indicated that only the MF systems manufactured by Pall, US Filter/Memcor, and Zenon can maintain reasonable production rates and intervals between cleaning chemicals, and have therefore been pre-qualified for the MF pre-selection program. Pilot testing indicated the Koch membrane either operated at reduced flux rates, excessive cleaning frequencies, and/or reduced recovery rate, and therefore resulted in an unacceptable rating for the Koch membrane. OCWD also tested the Aquasource membrane, with results of frequent cleanings, low flux and recovery rates, and need for additional use of chemicals, and also resulted in an unacceptable rating for the Aquasource membrane. To qualify for the submission of a Proposal and consideration for the award of a Contract, Proposers shall have participated in, and completed the Membrane Pretreatment System Demonstration Test conducted at the Orange County Water District's location between the period of April 6, 2000 and November 20, 2000. - I - MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT " Proposals shall be based on use of membrane systems that were used in the Demonstration Test. Benefits of Equipment— Specification Procurement The MF Equipment could be selected either through an equipment-based specifically (ES), or a performance-based specification (PS). An ES has the following benefits for the GWR System MF equipment: t. Based on extensive pilot testing at WF-21, the equipment requirements can be specially prescribed, rather than generally described in a PS; 2. Because of successful applications at other projects, the type size and quantity of equipment can be defined; 3. Systems selected with an ES can be comparatively bid because the basics of the systems are similar. Manufacturer Issues —Alternative Equipment Meetings with the three manufacturers throughout the preparation of the MF pre- selection documents have resulted in a good exchange of information, and clarification of particular document details. Zenon has proposed the use of an alternative membrane in the pre-selection program. The District has maintained the position that the equipment supplier shall provide the same membrane module that was used during demonstration testing. The proposed membrane atemative designated by Zenon as "ZW-500B' (B-prime)" is not the same as that was demonstrated and pre-qualified by the Orange County Water District and therefore cannot be considered or accepted as an "or-equal". Zenon has been pre-qualified to provide a proposal for the ZW-500B membrane that was demonstrated and we will evaluate a responsive proposal from Zenon. We have requested that the specifications be prepared using this membrane. However, Zenon has indicated that they will probably not submit a proposal unless the atemative membrane can be used as the basis of the proposal. Manufacturer Issues— Membrane Life The original documents for MF pre-selection included an assignment of an upper limit for the membrane warranty period to each of the individual membrane manufacturers. The basis for limiting the membrane fife considers pervious and ongoing experience with the particular membranes, and knowledge of the membrane chemistry. US Filter/Memcor and Pall have suggested an alternative strategy. The narrative below describes a refined solution to the membrane replacement warranty issue that is balanced between the District's consideration of cost and warranty protection and the membrane equipment supplier's objectives to present a fair and reasonable bid and offer a competitive price. -2- MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT _o Background The warranty structure that is provided by membrane manufacturers on typical membrane filtration projects is a "pro-rata" warranty. This type of approach has been used for most membrane applications due to the MF supplier and the District not having enough operational experience to accurately project a real membrane replacement interval. In the "pro-rata" warranty approach, the District will purchase the membrane and the MF supplier will give a membrane replacement cost and duration. If a membrane fails during the warranty duration, the manufacturer only pays for the replacement value of the unused duration in a linearly pro-rated cost based on the membrane replacement price offered by the MF supplier. It should be recognized that t) the pro-rata warranty concept is a "shared risk - pay for use approach" that limits the District and membrane supplier's exposure to incurred cost if the membranes require replacement before the end of the warranty period; 2) that the membrane supplier has to account for membrane replacement requirements as part of their pricing for the membrane; and 3) because of the quantities of membrane that is associated with the GWR System the criteria for membrane replacement is an important consideration. Because proprietary membrane systems are normally evaluated using a life cycle cost basis, there is commercial motivation for the membrane equipment supplier to offer a long pro-rata warranty period. A long pro-rata warranty period results in a lower calculated life cycle cost and a more favorable position during the competitive bidding process. Unfortunately, the declaration of a long pro-rata warranty period does not always reflect the anticipated or actual level of performance at a particular location. In this respect, the language that triggers membrane replacement has to be structured such that the risk associated with the warranty is clearly defined. Ultimately, if membrane replacement under warranty becomes an issue, it can become burdensome upon the District to implement membrane replacement under warranty. Suppliers will often point to uncontrollable variations in water quality or provision of the warranty that voids their obligation to provide replacement. Therefore irrespective of the life cycle cost analysis, the fad is that when equipment suppliers offer long unrealistic warranties, the District is at risk. In response to this challenge, one option we have considered the use a of warranty performance bond. It is our opinion, based upon historical membrane industry practice, that warranty performance bonds for "disposable" membranes subject to unforeseen water quality wastewater treatment conditions are generally not enforceable and introduces a third party to a potential legal claim process. Thus, the approach that is more favorable is development of a reasonable and rational warranty replacement strategy. Proposed Warranty and Life Cycle Evaluation To address the warranty issues, a modified pro-rata warranty has been developed that will eliminate the individual manufacturer upper limit for membrane replacement -3 - MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT a interval and will add a balanced approach to the risks associated with the membrane warranty. This modified approach is based upon the following considerations. 1) It is reasonable, that a 5-year pro-rata replacement interval is an acceptable minimum, and that 10-years is the longest that the District should consider. 2) Beyond 5-years, there will be shared risk between the District and the supplier. If the membranes require replacement, the pricing of the membranes in relation to the risk should be shared between the District and the supplier. 3) In the life cycle evaluation, an annual cost will be used instead of periodic membrane replacement costs. This annual cost approach is consistent with the financial approach of most agencies of allocating monies for membrane replacement on a yearly basis. 4) Provide a 5-year modified pro-rated warranty, and if the manufacturer decides to offer a longer warranty duration up to a maximum of 10-years, the maximum membrane price is based upon the 5 year (60-month) replacement value. Life Cycle Cost Analysis Components The MF pre-selection proposals will be reviewed and the preferred equipment selected on the basis of a life-cycle costs (LCC) analysis. The LCC analysis includes the following components to be provided by the manufacturers: • Temporary MF Equipment • Permanent MF Equipment Total MF System Cost Membrane Replacement Price Membrane Module Replacement Warranty Period MF equipment costs include the following: • Process Equipment • Process Pumps • Process Chemicals • Compressed air blowers and supply • Cleaning water supply (RO permeate) The LCC analysis calculates the present worth of all MF cost elements, including: • Capital costs - Equipment • Annual costs - Power and chemicals • Annual costs - Membrane replacement -4 - MICROFILTRATION EQUIPMENT The following criteria have been adopted in the basis of the LCC analysis: • Interest rate 6% • Cost recovery period 25 years • Energy cost 6% cents kWh • Chemicals Market rate Preliminary equipment and O&M costs, using the above components and criteria, were developed in the 30% design (DIM 3), and are summarized below: GWR System Microfiltration Equipment Summary of Estimated Capital and O&M Costs cal Preliminary Pall US Filter/Memcor Zenon Filtrate Capacity (80 mgd) Equipment Costs $ million) $28.9 $24.0 $31.0 O&M Costs (million ear Power $1.0 $0.9 $0.9 Chemical $0.9 $1.4 $0.9 Membrane Replacement $2.5 $1.7 $2.7 Total O&M Cost $4.4 $4.0 $4.5 (8)From DIM 3 -5- ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT c White Paper ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM This White Paper is prepared to provide additional background information on particular issues important to the program for pre-selection of ultraviolet (UV) equipment for the GWR System. The following topics are addressed in the White Paper. • Background • UV Research at OCWD • UV System Procurement for the GWR System • UV Pre-Selection Method and Schedule • 5 mgd Demonstration UV System • Existing WF-21 Calgon Rayox UV Tower System • Future Considerations Background The GWR System Ultraviolet light (UV) process is located downstream of the microfxltration (MF) and reverse osmosis (RO) processes. UV light technology will serve two important functions for the GWR System; the first is disinfection and second is destruction of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). The UV system must meet all disinfection requirements of the California Department of Health Services (DHS) Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (better known as Title 22 Reclamation Criteria). DHS also has a regulation specific to NDMA that calls for all drinking water supplies to meet a standard of 20 parts per trillion (ppt). The regulation of NDMA has come about recently and as a result the original design basis for the GWR System UV process has shifted from disinfection to NDMA destruction. The destruction of NDMA requires three to four times the level of UV treatment necessary for disinfection. This results in an increase in the amount of UV equipment of two to three times the amount originally estimated for disinfection alone. The UV system will be designed to reduce NDMA from 150 ppt down to 10 ppt. This is based on an estimated maximum NDMA concentration of 300 ppt in secondary effluent reduced to 150 ppt by the RO process. The RO process is capable of reducing NOMA by 50%. UV Research at OCWD UV testing has occurred at WF-21 since 1997. The testing originally centered on disinfection removal efficiency. Several systems were tested using effluent from the Green Acres Project tertiary plant. The testing evaluated the ability of UV systems to meet virus and bacteria removal requirements set fourth in the Title 22 Reclamation Criteria. This testing led allowed two wastewater UV systems to achieve Title 22 certification for disinfection from DHS. At the time, certification of the two UV systems did not benefit OCWD directly since no plans for the use of UV were eminent. However, the advancement of the use of UV was benefited by having more approved systems available on the market. The use of UV for disinfection is well understood due to - I - ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT e widespread testing and research worldwide. This testing and research has allowed more and more agencies to feel comfortable using this technology to meet disinfection requirements. Beginning in 2000, NDMA emerged as a contaminant of concern and was regulated by DHS not to exceed 20 ppt for drinking water supplies. This standard also applied to WF-21 since the treated wastewater eventually would enter the drinking water aquifer via the seawater intrusion barrier. This led OCWD to procure and install a 5 mgd Calgon Rayox UV system for use in NDMA destruction. This system was installed in April 2001 and has operated successfully since. The emergence of NDMA as a contaminant of concern led recently to a shift in focus of UV system testing to NDMA destruction rather than disinfection efficiency. Testing of UV systems for NDMA destruction occurred using RO effluent from the OCWD microfiltration / reverse osmosis demonstration plant (MDP). This plant consists of a full scale Pall MF system followed by a full scale RO system which uses the latest generation RO membranes, similar to the equipment to be used in the GWR System. The MDP plant is capable of producing 400,000 gallons per day of RO treated water. The majority of testing done at WF-21 for NDMA removal by UV technology has been on a pilot scale basis. The pilot systems are capable of treating 10 to 20 gallons per minute (gpm) at the dose levels required for NDMA destruction. Three pilot scale UV systems were tested from September 2000 to January 2001 including one medium pressure lamp technology test and two low pressure-high output lamp technology systems. The medium pressure lamp system was supplied by Aquionics and the two low-pressure lamp systems were supplied by Wedeco-Ideal Horizons and Trojan Technologies. This pilot scale testing proved that both low pressure-high intensity and medium pressure UV lamp technologies are effective in NDMA destruction. Beginning in June 2001, testing commenced using demonstration scale UV systems for NDMA destruction. The first demonstration scale UV system tested was a medium pressure lamp system from Aquionics. This system was tested previously on the Green Acres Project water for disinfection efficiency. This Aquionics system was capable of treating up to 900 gallons per minute at the doses necessary for NDMA removal. In August 2001 Aquionics sent another medium pressure lamp system specifically designed for NDMA destruction. This system was also capable of treating up to 900 gallons per minute. Finally, in October 2001 a low pressure-high output lamp system from Trojan Technologies will be tested. This system is capable of treating 500 gallons per minute for NDMA destruction. The demonstration scale NDMA destruction testing results will be made available to the UV manufacturers prior to the proposal date for the GWR System. The data gained from this testing will allow the manufacturers to have a better idea of the requirements necessary to meet the GWR System design criteria. Wastewater sources vary in nature from one treatment plant to another so this testing gives NDMA destruction data using water that very closely simulates water to be produced from the GWR System. OCWD staff under the direction of Mehul Patel has done all testing performed at WF-21. The initial UV testing for NDMA removal on a pilot scale basis was done using consultation with the engineering consulting firm CH2M Hill. The OCWD laboratory staff performed all NDMA laboratory analysis. -2- ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT UV System Procurement for the GWR System During the project development phase of the GWR System, four UV manufacturers were pre-selected based on qualifications to provide equipment for a project of this size. The four pre-selected manufacturers each produced UV systems that met the design criteria designated by the GWR System staff. Mainly the design required the UV system to be a closed-vessel type employing either low pressure-high intensity or medium pressure lamp technology. The four pre-qualified UV manufacturers are: • Calgon Carbon Corporation (medium pressure lamp technology) •Aquionics (medium pressure lamp technology) • Trojan Technologies (low pressure-high output or medium pressure technology) •Wedeco-Ideal Horizons (Low pressure-high output lamp technology) During the current final design phase a series of meetings will be held with each UV manufacturer. The initial round of meetings occurred on September 19, 20, and 21 of this year. These meetings allowed for the GWR System, CDM, and Brown and Caldwell staff to learn exactly what equipment will be proposed from each manufacturer. The meetings also allowed staff to determine which issues are of concern for the UV manufacturers for proposing on this project. Another set of meetings will occur with the UV manufacturers upon completion of a 90% proposal document by the CDM/Brown and Caldwell design team. These meetings will allow the UV manufacturers to preview the proposal documents before they are issued and make any comments or concerns known. This round of meetings should occur some time near the end of October 2001. This same approach was followed for the MF procurement. The main difference between procurement of the MF and UV systems is the method by which the equipment is procured. The MF equipment will be procured using an equipment specification while the UV equipment will employ the use of a performance specification. The primary reason for use of a performance specification is the lack of available, extensive knowledge on destruction of NDMA by UV processes. The MF process on the other hand is well known due to years of testing at WF-21 and widespread use of this process at other locations. The main difference between a performance specification and an equipment specification is determination of the amount of equipment necessary to meet the design criteria. A performance specification calls for the manufacturer to determine what amount of equipment is necessary and to guarantee the performance for the equipment to meet design criteria. An equipment specification has the purchaser of the equipment specify the amount of equipment. The responsibility for making sure the amount of equipment supplied is sufficient to meet design criteria rests on the purchaser. In the case of the UV equipment for the GWR System, the UV manufacturer will provide enough equipment to guarantee the NDMA removal and disinfection requirements set forth in the design criteria (i.e. reduction of NDMA from 150 to 10 ppt and Title 22 Reclamation Criteria for disinfection). The UV manufacturer will be required to submit a performance bond with their proposal to cover costs associated with redesign of equipment that does not perform as promised in the proposal. -3 - ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT UV Preselection Method and Schedule The UV equipment pre-selection will be based on a simple present worth life cycle cost (LCC) analysis similar to that used for MF equipment procurement. The LCC analysis will be based on a 25 year life and a 6% interest rate. The items included in the LCC analysis include the following: • Capital cost—equipment for both a 5 mgd demonstration and 65 mgd full system • Power costs—based on 6.5 cents per kilowatt-hour • Lamp replacement cost • Ballast replacement cost • Lamp replacement interval In a similar manner to the membranes supplied for the MF facility, the UV lamp life and the periodic lamp replacement are an important consideration in determining the life cycle costs of the various UV configurations. Two basic types of UV lamps can be supplied by the UV manufacturers: medium pressure (MP) and low pressure-high output (LPHO). MP lamps operate at a higher power output and a higher temperature than LPHO lamps. MP installations require fewer lamps; however, the lamps are more expensive and require more frequent replacement. Both types of lamps have been in service at multiple locations for several years and their anticipated life is generally established. The manufacturers will set the lamp cost and lamp life for the life cycle cost in the proposal to the District. The MP lamps will be required to be warranted by the manufacturer for 3000 hours (pro rate) and the LPHO lamps for 8000 hours (pro rate). A UV manufacturer will be allowed to indicate a longer lamp life if the warranty is provided for the longer life. The warranty for an indicated life beyond the stipulated 3000 or 8000 hours will not be pro rate. The credit for useful life received will be capped at the percentage of lamp life developed by dividing the applicable minimum stipulated life by the lamp life proposed by the manufacturer. For example, a MP lamp manufacturer that proposes 4000 hours will receive no more than 75 percent credit (3000 hours / 4000 hours) if lamps do not last for the indicated fife. If the lamp fails at 3500 hours, the manufacturer will be required to supply replacement lamps at a 25 percent discount to the District. The manufacturers will not be allowed to indicate a lamp life greater than two times the stipulated minimum values. The UV system will not be housed in a building, but will sit under a canopy-type structure. The electrical and power related equipment however, will need to be housed in a climate-controlled structure. The size and temperature requirements of this structure vary from one manufacturer to another. The UV equipment procurement will include the following three contracts: 1. Demonstration and permanent UV system engineering (shop drawingstlayout preparation) 2. Demonstration 5 mgd UV system 3. Permanent 65 mgd UV system -4- ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT The first contract is between OCWD and the UV equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $250,000 in the UV proposal document. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to get the information required to design the facilities necessary for the selected UV system. The contract for the demonstration UV system will be assigned to a general contractor and will be limited to 10% of the cost of the full system equipment. (If the schedule permits this contract may be assigned to the temporary MF system installation contractor.) The contract for the permanent UV system will be assigned to the AWT general contractor and is estimated at$10,000,000. The UV procurement process will proceed using the following schedule: November 2001 —Send proposal documents to UV manufacturers January 2002 — Receive proposals from UV manufacturers February 2002 —Award contract to pre-selected UV manufacturer February 2002 to August 2002 — Engineering for UV system design August 2003 to November 2005 —AWT construction March 2003 to January 2004 — Demonstration testing on 5 mgd UV system 5 mgd Demonstration UV System The pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer will be required to provide a 5 mgd demonstration UV system. This system will be delivered prior to delivery of the full system. The demonstration UV system is necessary for two reasons. One is that it will allow the GWR System staff and the UV manufacturer to determine if their proposed design performs as claimed in the proposal for both NDMA destruction and disinfection. Should the system not perform as proposed, the manufacturer would be required to revise the design and provide modified equipment at their cost. This will help ensure that the system will perform as designed. Second, the demonstration UV system is necessary for DHS certification. All UV systems installed to meet Title 22 Reclamation Criteria require DHS certification. The UV manufacturer must perform all necessary tests required for DHS certification prior to installation of the full system. The UV manufacturer will be required to design the demonstration system so that it could be incorporated into the full plant. This will reduce capital costs since only 65 mgd worth of additional equipment will be necessary rather than 70 mgd. The demonstration system will be used with water generated from the interim WF-21 operation. The interim WF-21 will consist of a temporary 6.5 mgd microfiltration system and the existing 5 mgd reverse osmosis system. The existing WF-21 5 mgd RO system would be fitted with new RO membranes of the type to be used for the GWR System RO process. The current WF-21 RO membranes are only capable of 10 to 20% NDMA removal as compared with 50% by newer model membranes like the type to be used for the GWR System. Existing WF-21 Calgon Rayox UV Tower System A Calgon Rayox UV tower system is currently used on the WF-21 treatment process for destruction of NDMA at a flow rate of 5 mgd. This system would continue to be operated during the interim WF-21 operation to provide NDMA destruction as well as disinfection. Should Calgon Corporation become the pre-selected UV manufacturer the -5 - ULTRAVIOLET EQUIPMENT existing 5 mgd system would be used for the required demonstration period. Each train , of the GWR System UV process would treat a minimum of 10 to 14 mgd. Calgon Corporation has stated that it may be cost prohibitive to incorporate this system into the GWR System. Calgon is proposing to use a larger model UV system capable of treating the flows required by the GWR System. The existing Calgon Rayox UV tower would be sold back to Calgon or a third party prior to implementation of the GWR System. Future Considerations Finally the GWR System UV process design will leave additional space and size all electrical supplies for destruction of NDMA to 2 ppt as previously stated. The current DHS NDMA standard is 20 ppt and the GWR System UV process is being conservatively designed to meet 10 ppt. Should DHS ever lower the NDMA standard to 2 ppt in the future the UV process site plan could accommodate the additional equipment necessary to meet this standard. -6- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mating Date Toed.or Dir. 10/24/O1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iem Number Ib Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources and Employee Development Originator: Judy Bucher, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CONTINUATION OF SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR MILITARY RESERVISTS CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-20, Authorizing Salary and Benefit Continuation for Military Reservists Called to Active Duty Relating to Presidential Executive Order of September 14, 2001. SUMMARY Current District policy authorizes continuing benefits for the first 30 days of a military leave, pursuant to the State of California Military and Veterans Code Section 395.01. The District supports the United States military and recognizes the important role military reservists play in resolving conflict and defending our country. In 1991, the Board approved the continuation of salary and health insurance benefits for reservists called to active duty during Operation Desert Storm. In support of District employees who currently serve as United States military reservists and are called to active duty, adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 01-20 would extend the continuation of salary and benefits for the duration of the Executive Order of September 14, 2001 ordering the ready reserve of the armed forces to active duty. There are four District employees in the active military reserves at this time. There may be additional employees who are inactive reservists and could possibly be called for active duty. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Not to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-20 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda Reports\1001\16.Military Resolulion.doo aeNsed =001 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-20 AUTHORIZING SALARY AND BENEFIT CONTINUATION FOR MILITARY RESERVISTS CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2001. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING CONTINUATION OF SALARY, INSURANCE AND LEAVE BENEFITS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES WHO SERVE AS UNITED STATES MILITARY RESERVISTS AND WHO ARE CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 ORDERING THE READY RESERVE OF THE ARMED FORCES TO ACTIVE DUTY. WHEREAS, on September 11, 2001 the United States of America suffered immense tragedy and horror as terrorist acts took thousands of valued lives; WHEREAS, military action has already begun in response to those attacks upon the United States and its residents and call-up of active military reservists is now taking place; WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") supports the U. S. military and deeply appreciates the role military reservists play in resolving conflict and defending our Country; WHEREAS, a number of District employees are active military reservists and may be called to active duty in connection with the Executive Order, WHEREAS, while the District can do little to ease the concerns for safety or burden of separation of employees from their families, it can ensure that they do not face the hardship of diminished income or loss of health care coverage; WHEREAS, District Policy D10.00 and state law provide for payment of an employee's full salary for the first thirty days of temporary military leave of absence for active duty; WHEREAS, the supplemental salary and benefits provided in this Resolution are intended to provide salary and benefits in excess of that required by State law and District policy. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: Employees in the military reserve who are called into active service shall receive full compensation for the first thirty days and shall thereafter receive the difference between their regular base salary with the District and their military pay. Section 2: Such employees shall receive continuation of all leave time accruals, including personal leave or vacation and sick time accruals or equivalent. Section 3: Such employees shall receive continuation of the health insurance coverage in effect at such time as the employee is called into active service until such time as he/she returns. Section 4: The pay and benefits authorized by this resolution shall remain in effect for the full duration of the employee's activated military assignment. Section 5: The District urges all local governments and private sector employers to consider providing similar support and assistance to their employees who are called into active duty. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 24, 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary Gftw .dla�dmINBS\Rwoludons�2001 W1.20.doo