Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-23 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT May 16, 2001 puma: NOTICE OF MEETING (714)9e2-2411 (7141982-0359 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT malling t ldro n Foun[an Valleyy�CA WEDNESDAY, May 23, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. 92728.8127 Kreet s Aoi ta: 10 844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley CA DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies 0 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Cities District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anehaiii 9ree suede Perk Lypraea -Qzl..v Fountain Valley Fullerton Bearden Beach Board Sucre Huntington beech kiiii. La Hub. e Palooma Loa Alamitos Newport Beech orange Pr Ann A Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming o Meetins SeeleefBurns 8e,chacll $dMBa T.oppar, VIP Part OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 6, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. ",a Linda County 4r orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, June 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. Units, Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Costa Meat SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, June 11,2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD Midway City FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 13,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts broadly Reach STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 27,2001 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-claw leadership in wastewater and water resource management. m �m BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting June June 27, 2001 July *July 18, 2001 August August 22, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November November 28, 2001 December •December 19, 2001 January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 March March 27, 2002 April April 24, 2002 May May 22, 2002 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month Nead\daUllwp.dt WdminXBSUgenda\2001 Meeting NoUwWAN5.2.doc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT May 16, 2001 goal NOTICE OF MEETING 17141962-2411 figic 014196211356 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1ensueCsel... 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .111,g address: Faun[°�Vall y..� WEDNESDAY, May 23, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. 92728-6127 Ararat address: 10e44 Ellis Avenue Fvun[a2 Valley,0A 9270BA01B DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Cities District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Buena Park Lypress F4unmin Valley - Fullerton Barden Oraea oard Secre Hundngtan Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Ahewpor[Broth Orange Retired Tentatively- Scheduled Uocoming Meetings septa Ana seal Beach Blanton Tustin Win Park OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 6,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Yorba Linda County of orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday,June 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. sanitary Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT fosse Mesa SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,June 11,2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD Midway of FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 13,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts Irvine aanth STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 27,2001 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership in wae<ewa[er and water resource management. • Ob BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting June June 27, 2001 July 'July 18, 2001 August August 22, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November November 28, 2001 December `December 19, 2001 January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 March March 27, 2002 April April 24, 2002 May May 22, 2002 *Meetings; are being held on the third Wednesday of the month 14eadWaWl\wp.dWWdmin\BS%Agenda12001 Meeling NoOmWN5.2.doc I ! TO: Harbor Quality Committee FROM: Jack Skinner DATE: April 28, 2001 RE: OCSD's 301(h) waiver I am writing because I have concerns about the re-issuing of the Orange County Sanitation District's 301(h) waiver. I recently learned that the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) performed a study in the fall of 1996 known as the 20-Meter Study. This study tested ocean water quality on ten different days between September 26, 1996, and November 25, 1996, to determine if the wastewater plume was moving shoreward. There were five sample sites located at the 20-meter depth contour. Three samples were taken at each sample site (at surface, bottom and middle depths). No samples were taken closer to shore than the 20-meter depth at the time of this study with the exception of the samples taken at ankle depth right at the beach. To the best of my knowledge, this study was never released to the public or included in OCSD's yearly marine monitoring reports. However, this information was available to OCSD before they applied for the renewal of their current waiver, which was issued in June 1998. The study was only discovered by the public in January 2001. The findings of this study are troubling because it appears that, intermittently, the wastewater plume moves toward the beaches. On November 20, 1996, bacterial readings indicate that the plume did reach the beaches in West Newport. This is shown on the enclosed chart. Note the elevated total coliforms at the Newport Beach shoreline sampling locations and the exceedingly elevated fecal coliform levels taken near the ocean bottom at the 20-meter sampling sites, stretching all the way from off the Huntington Beach power plant to off the Newport pier. Also enclosed is a picture apparently showing a composite of the bacteriological results of the 20-meter fecal coliform study. The ocean bottom fecal coliform samples equaled or exceeded 400 MPN in the area circled in red, showing that the wastewater field comes very close to Newport's beaches. iY Recently, a more extensive plume study was done on November 27, 2000, by OCSD, the results of which are shown on the enclosure marked Figure 28. Again, it shows that the wastewater plume is coming toward the shore, especially near the power plant in Huntington Beach. Please note how far the plume has moved toward shore from the end of the outfall. Dr. Stanley Grant of UCI has performed an extensive review of the bacteriological data and has concluded that since a bacterial pulse arrives at the beach at station 9N during flood tides before any bacteria has entered the ocean from the Talbert Marsh that this is further evidence of an offshore source of bacterial pollution of the beach. This is because the high tides act as a temporary barrier, preventing the marsh water from entering the ocean. Extensive studies of offshore currents are planned for this summer. Based on the above evidence, I believe that there should not be a renewal of OCSD's 301(h) waiver. These studies indicate that there is a strong possibility that, intermittently, bacterial contamination from the outfall can reach the shoreline and thereby pose a threat to swimmers. It is for OCSD to prove otherwise. Secondary treatment with activated sludge removes about 95 percent of the viral pathogens. The lower suspended solids present in secondary treated sewage allow chlorination to be more effective should that prove necessary. Perhaps the only safe solution is to treat the entire effluent to the tertiary level to be used for reclamation purposes and eliminate all ocean discharges. Treating sewage to less than the secondary level becomes a disincentive to reclamation since all reclaimed water must go through the secondary process and beyond. In the past, Nancy and I have opposed the granting of 301(h) waivers to sanitation districts with short outfalls but until recently, we had not been concerned about the Orange County Sanitation District's discharge four and a half miles off the coast. However, we have had second thoughts about the safety of OCSD's ocean discharge because of recent evidence that there is shoreward movement of the wastewater plume. Jack Skinner 1" Y � .1"<.F r � {'J.�uYY*3 ! .r.#"Y y»,���t'. � s sfs c"� t e r ;� 'tN rie s �>t Fh. . ••�t}t5 �s� f ylf Gy,.y A r s >€ye • y •+ t�l � I x r * `9�t a'• r 3 .s f ,�. ! }n 't 2y �'J,c'�^� rf i'� }4./��.a r ..i S � �r is }', , �;ems; fs ' f� '-< � �7�� � I � t x fr'f;�F ' ..� t ;� {4 � y w Y 'Y �'�`..es.6� s.: C^.r 'yw ..r yY - .,r .t,. .f'- . r��,y'. Y e.4�4..��a.-3 Yl s > 37s*s :n + `� �` 4k ��+ �a�s{f r +tt -�� '>�°.us 1 1 1 �z� "� �n�is'�*' �"�"z ^W � t 'SLx"'�Ty,�. m� . >tJ��a ��s �&��t�w`i ® t iy m;S s �, Qx.:yYg ceZr � i f ` x�4tiY ;.1;• �3ps i tti F�', 'le �' <..1a+_. zc}, 4" ��i�' �°v,�'�}��.� � < ^�'._A� .fhb.+ � fir! K Py ® �'P '�..}�' } K .� iK �e it � _ 1 ;3. r1�L N'xi� G _ � ���.�� � 43 ������� ,I , �� f i. 1 ^�f r `yyCr: / t s tS l� Yr,� i. _ ® -. x�� -3 . 1 it f®alyk{>�jit F2. . ? 1 , e 4' t 1 �Gi��,' 1 n � 2`'�u4vt � 1 1Yi - II I � `s II it � II I II 1 SII t it} _ ` 111 I - ,I �11�. 1 1 II � • • - • � of, 1996) Bolsa Chico State $each Santa AfI2 River F-I.A I'd xuntington Beach p DI PLANT No- 2 Newport �p ` Naw}wst Bay Present. / Beach ?'ZO MPN h�tam Crystal Coda "a State Pack y y i Tabl Cogtorm Bottom Contour nog trap.i dl 2,00 - •.oo i 'vim �i!!m+... / \ osa r u / Bottom Contour E c� 4 9 udr(rH tl09 innabrrtiad� � ..Oo _ a.a 0 Figure 28. Bottom depth surface planes of Top)Total Coliform(log transformed)and Bottom)E.Coli(log transformed(for November27,2000. o�s•�r sa.x�w.uaa,c.�u. Health Dangers Arise From Pumping Of Sewage Into Deep Sea From Ocean Update September 1999 Vol. 4, No. 9 Paul R. Epstein, Center for Health and the Global EmAronmenl, Harwrd Medical School. Tel (617)432-0493 An outbreak of cholera on the southern Coast of Bangladesh in 1992 may presage the risks posed to dewloped and less-developed countries alike from deep-sea dumping of human sewage, according to some researchers. Scientists haw noted that the 1992 outbreak was accompanied by an upwelling that brought deep-sea water to the surface near the Bangladeshi coast. In recent years, researchers have discovered a variety of pathogenic microbes, many usually found only in human feces, at unexpected depths of the ocean. Marine scientist D. Jay Grimes of the University of Southern Mississippi says that a wriety of Nmses that infect the human gastrointestinal tract- including polioAms and rotaNrus -haw been identified In ocean water samples taken below 1,0000 meters (3,300 feet). In the late 1969s, Sager M. Goyal of the University of Minnesota isolated gut bacteria from samples obtained as sewage-sludge dumping sites more than 170 kilometers offshore from New York City, 30 months after the sites were closed to dumping. The bacteria were resistant to several antibiotics, showing that they originated from humans who were taking the drugs. TI,unEey,Mry W,3W1 Amm1u OnOne:Jon V] V�q: l I Kyle, Penny From: Lawson, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, May 23,2001 8:24 AM To: Kyle, Penny Subject: FW: Director List —061nal Message— From: Dennis Baker lmallto:bakerdj@mindspnncwrnj Sent: Wednesday,May 23,2001 7:54 AM To: foenfa ation@ocsd.wrn Cc: Sonja Wassgren Subject: Director List I am unable to attend tonight's board meeting. Please present the following to the board. Members of Orange County Sanitation District Board, The OCSD is"disposing"of a valuable commodity each day. Over 600 acre-feet of valuable water go out the Ocean Outfall per day. The cost to buy this amount of water from the Metropolitan Water District, at$450 an acre-foot, is $270,000. That's $275,000 a day. The ground water level in the Orange County aquifer is dangerously low, and continues to fall, so it is not only a matter of the monetary loss,but the actual quality and availability of water for the county. The move to reclaim some of this water is commendable. This move should be expanded to reclaim all of this valuable water. The cost to reclaim this water is competitive, $420 per acre- foot. Full secondary treatment of the county's effluent would be a contributing part of this full reclamation. By instituting full secondary treatment now,the district is taking a positive step towards a greater goal of full reclamation of valuable water for the whole county. Dennis Baker Corona del Mar 949.675.2199 bakerdj@,mindspring.com t Treatment Issues and the §301(h) Provision of the Clean Water Act History/Background The Clean Water Act is a 1972 amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The 1972 Clean Water Act requires publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) to use secondary treatment prior to discharge to surface waters. In 1977, Congress added section 301(h) to the Clean Water Act. It allowed qualified POTWs employing rigorous pretreatment and extensive ocean monitoring programs to discharge into deep ocean waters that had large tides and substantial currents allowing for greater dilution and dispersion than inland and estuarine water bodies. OCSD received the 301(h) approval in 1985. In 1989, the district filed a 301(h)-renewal application and on February 22, 1990 the 1985 permit expired and was administratively extended. In June 1998, the United States Environmental Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a new NPDES permit for a five-year period. The 301(h) provision of the Clean Water Act allows for a slight increase in the amount of total suspended solids and biological oxygen demand. These slight increases are in the concentration, but there is still a limit in the overall mass that can be discharged into the ocean. Recipients of the 301 (h) permit are also required to meet stringent criteria including: protection of the beach and nearshore recreational activities, maintenance of a balanced native fish population, an extensive ocean monitoring program, and a rigorous pretreatment program in order to met secondary water equivalency for removal of toxics. Key Message OCSD is committed to protecting the health and safety of the public and marine life. At the same time, the district recognizes its responsibility to act as an environmental caretaker in addressing the larger issue of balancing impacts upon the air, land, energy, and water. In light of recent issues surrounding ocean water closures and new theories regarding the possible movement of OCSD's treated wastewater plume, we are currently in the process of researching the dynamics of the ocean and how and where the treated wastewater travels. Should it be determined that the treated wastewater released 4 miles off shore is reaching recreational waters, OCSD will change operations. There are options for treatment level changes that can occur while maintaining the 301(h) provision. Our goal is to make sure than any decision to make a treatment level change is based on science, and that fee increases charged to residents and business owners for the treatment level changes is money well spent to protect public health and the environment. Secondary Messages • OCSD is in full compliance with water quality standards of the Clean Water Act. • OCSD believes that the section 301(h) provision allows for greater overall environmental protection of the land, air and sea while protecting the balance of the native population of fish, shellfish and wildlife and assures future flexibility for the agency to implement the newest and most efficient treatment systems. • OCSD has an extensive and rigorous pretreatment program to meet secondary water quality equivalency for the removal of toxics, and an extensive wastewater and ocean monitoring program to protect the public health and the environment. • OCSD would consume much more energy - both electricity and natural gas necessary to run the co-generation facilities. In 2020, with the Ground Water Replenishment Program and operating at full secondary, we would be required to manage approximately 25 percent more biosolids than currently generated, and increase air emissions into the environment Projected Biosolids Disposal Year 2000 (GWRS not on-line vet) Scenario 1 (Permit limits) 18,390 (tons/month) Scenario 3 (Full Secondary) 24,940 (tons/month) Approximately 36% increase Year2020 Scenario 2 (Permit limits w/GWRS) 28,480 (tons/month) Scenario 4 (Full Secondary w/GWRS) 35,120 (tons/month) Approximately 23% increase If you receive requests for more information on the treatment level issues or know of a group who would benefit from hearing a presentation, please contact Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager at 714/593-7120 or Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services at 7141593-7400. `O,NM1V 1.1Ny4 tiNN ,- r itsen to questions about... N'e`(YC rME ENNM1�O 301 (h) Provision of the Clean Water Act • Background The Clean Water Act(CWA) is a 1972 amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The 1972 CWA requires publicly owned treatment ,., works(POTWs)to use secondary treatment prior to discharge to ocean waters. In 1977, § 301(h)was added to the Clean Water Act. It allowed qualified POTWs employing rigorous pretreatment and extensive ocean monitoring programs to discharge into deep ocean waters that had large tides and substantial currents allowing for greater dilution and dispersion than inland and estuarine waterbodies. In order for a POTW to qualify for a discharge permit under §301(h)of the Clean Water Act,the discharger must meet stringent criteria including: . Compliance with water quality standards of the Clean Water Act and the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act . Protection and reproduction of a balanced native population of fish, shellfish and wildlife �) . Protection of beach and nearshore recreational activities l - . Establishment of an extensive ocean monitoring program � . A rigorous pretreatment program in order to meet secondary water quality equivalency for the removal of taxies • Protection of public water supplies Since the adoption of the Clean Water Act,the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has consistently complied with this and all other federal, state and local Orange County regulations. Sanitation District • Who issues OCSD's Ocean Discharge Permit? When was the last permit issued? The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD)ocean To maintain isvirld-claa; discharge permit is jointly issued by the federal Environmental Protection Agency leadership in unutcul (EPA)and the State of California by the local Regional Water Quality Control Board and ix,attir resource (RWQCB).The ocean discharge permit requires review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to assure that the issuance of a permit will not impact endangered or threatened species. Also, the California Coastal Commission performs a review of the permit for consistency with the Coastal Act. The permitting process requires a series of public hearings that assure an oppor- tunity for all interested parties to comment on the draft permit. The 5-year permit that OCSD is currently operating under was issued in June 1998 and expires in June 2003.The renewal application must be submitted to the regulators by December 2002. 10844 Ellis Avenue • How does OCSD treat wastewater? What is advanced Fountain primary treatment? OCSD treats wastewater using three processes: r t • preliminary treatment, advanced primary treatment,and secondary treatment. for more information In preliminary treatment,wastewater passes through screens that remove large and nonorganic materials. It then flows into grit chambers where the heaviest or Visit our web site materials such as egg shells, coffee grounds, and sand settle out. The materials removed here are then sent to a landfill. OCSD/053301/3011H1.<dr pogei After preliminary treatment, the wastewater is pumped to large settling basins. Chemicals are added to reduce hydrogen sulfide, control odors,and combine small particles into larger particles. Here liquids and solids are separated. The heavier solids settle and are scraped off the bottom, and the lighter material is skimmed off the top of the basins.The thickeners that are added to improve settling of the heavier solids result in advanced primary treated wastewater. All of OCSD's wastewater receives advanced primary treatment.Advanced primary treatment removes 70 percent of the solids in the wastewater. Secondary treatment is primarily a biological system that uses microorganisms to feed on the organic material that is left in the water after primary treatment. OCSD treats approximately half of its wastewater using secondary treatment. Combined primary and secondary treatment remove 85 percent of the solids in the wastewater. OCSD uses two different processes for secondary treatment: trickling filters and activated sludge. Trickling filters use revolving arms that spray wastewater over baseball sized rocks covered in zoogleal slime(microorganisms)to clarify the wastewater.Activated sludge is a brownish mixture containing a variety of aerobic microorganisms. The activated sludge is mixed with the wastewater in large tanks.Air or oxygen is bubbled through the mixture creating an ideal environment for the bacteria to feed, grow and reproduce. The bacteria eat most of the dissolved organic material in the wastewater. • What is the difference between the standards required In a full secondary treatment permit and a permit issued under the § 310(h) section? The § 301(h) provision of the federal Clean Water Act allows for a slight increase in the amount of total suspended solids(TSS) and biological oxygen demand (BOD)over set standards imposed on other ocean discharge permit holders. These slight increases are in the concentration, but there is still a limit in the overall mass that can be discharged. However,the § 301(h)permit requires increased ocean monitoring by OCSD and increased environmental examination by regulatory agencies. • Where does the water go after treatment? After treatment, OCSD discharges the treated effluent between four and five miles out to sea from an ocean outfall pipe 200 feet underwater. The outfall runs perpendicular to the beach heading out to sea lust north of the Santa Ana River in Huntington Beach. • Does OCSD test to make sure fish and other sea life are not affected by the outfall's treated effluent discharge? OCSD conducts an annual multi-million dollar ocean-monitoring program.The extensive monitoring program tracks and evaluates water quality,sediment quality and sea life from Seal Beach to Corona Del Mar. The program is designed to measure impacts to the coastal ocean environment from the discharge of treated wastewater so that OCSD can take appropriate measures to ensure the continued protection of human health and marine organisms. Thousands of samples are taken each year from the coastal waters and bottom sediments using rig fishing, trawling, sediment grabs,water column testing and in plant wastewater samples to ensure the safety and health of the public and marine life. OCSD is required to perform more sampling than other agencies, but annually the agency does considerably more that the minimum requirements due to its interest in overall watershed and environmental protection. ocsoro523e1n01(N).M, yaye 2 • Why does OCSD choose to be regulated under the § 301(h) provision rather than implement full secondary treatment? OCSD believes that the § 301(h) provision allows the agency to strike a balance between the impacts upon the air, land and water environments due to the wastewater treatment process. As a result, OCSD believes that the § 301(h) . rt t'`i •.^" provision allows for greater overall environmental protection of the land, air and 2 sea and assures future flexibility for the agency to implement the newest and most efficient treatment systems. • What would happen if OCSD was required to change wastewater treatment levels to full secondary? OCSD would consume much more energy(electricity and natural gas necessary to run the co-generation facilities), be required to manage approximately 25% percent more biosolids than currently generated, and increase air emissions into the environment. The ratepayers in Orange County would pay an additional $200-400 million dollars for construction of secondary facilities and approximately$10 million dollars more �4'r>•-"- �. a year in operations and maintenance. The bulk of the amount is the cost of handling and disposing of 6iosolids. a _ • How is the § 301(h) provision linked to ocean water closures? The § 301(h)provision is not related to the ocean water closures. The closures are due to the presence of bacteria in the water,which is not believed to be associated with OCSD's discharge. OCSD has repeatedly per- formed wastewater analyses to demonstrate that the effluent plume is not reaching nearshore waters; however, more analyses are planned to further assure protection of public health. Full secondary treatment would not provide any significant further protection of public health,as secondary treatment is NOT a form of disinfection to rid the effluent of further bacteria. • What differences might occur in the ocean environment without the district's § 301(h) provision? We would not see any difference in the ocean's sediment, however we might be able to detect a decrease in the abundance of the fish around the discharge zone. There has been an ecosystem established that uses some of the discharged nutrients for food. By removing additional solids,we would be removing nutrients currently being released to the ecosystem. There is the potential to slightly increase the clarity in the water near the dis- charge due to decreased solids. While the increase would be calculable, it is likely not measurable. • The 20-year Strategic Plan, dated 1999, shows that you are preparing for full secondary treatment. When will that be done? Why not sooner? The 1999 Strategic Plan process, which was a public process, indicated that OCSD should pursue water reclamation and - maintain the use of the § 301(h) provision of the Clean Water Act. OCSD believes �'= that § 301(h) permit allows for a beneficial balance overall between the land, air - and ocean environments. OCSD is not progressing towards full secondary at this time. If the decision were made today to proceed to full secondary, it would take 5-10 years for OCSD to begin operation. OCSD/052301/301(H).Wr pep.3 r DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTIO COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, May 17, 2001, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 17, 2001, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Maintenance Brian Brady Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Guy Carrozzo John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Alice Jempsa Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Beth Krom Tod Haynes, Construction Supervisor Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Mike Bock, Project Manager Tod Ridgeway Gail Cain, Acting Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Getter, CGvL Engineers (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5! Y. PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 May 17, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the April 5, 2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair, Steve Anderson, welcomed Director Brian Brady who has replaced Peer Swan as a Committee member. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported on treatment levels and ocean issues. Mr. Anderson reported that the first round of the intensive ocean monitoring studies will begin on May 22. The studies will generate about one million data points that will hopefully provide an answer to the hypothesis that the District's discharge may impact the beach. Mr. Anderson reported that staff is continuing to study methods for improving our level of treatment, and that a fast-track microfiltration research project will be brought directly to the Board in June 2001. He also reported that he will be traveling to Washington, D.C. to attend the Annual Conference of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies to work on issues related to biosolids management and air quality. Mr. Anderson will also visit Dana Rohrbacher regarding funding support for the ocean monitoring work that is underway, and Ken Calvert from Riverside County regarding issues related to the Santa Ana River Interceptor funding. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, asked that the issues scheduled to be addressed in this section regarding SARI Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241, be discussed under Item (13), Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Status Report. (8) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, reported on public outreach regarding the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line. A Citizen Advisory Committee meeting was held on May 8 with a small group of residents and business owners from the neighborhood. Ms. Lawson reported that there were some very good questions asked about the need of the project, the urgency behind it, and what would happen today if the line broke in the river. Ms. Lawson also reported on media briefings and coverage by The Orange County Register,the Times, KFWB, NPR, and Channel 2. Coverage is expected to continue and we will provide briefings to the media throughout the summer surveys. Ms. Lawson advised that The Orange County Register has been at the District reviewing the Cooperative Projects files for an upcoming story on city sewer lines. She also indicated that the Directors could expect to be contacted by the Los Angeles Times regarding our Ocean Discharge Permit and upcoming renewal. V PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 May 17, 2001 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. John Linder, Construction Manager, reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the PSA and Addenda Report. (12) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. (13) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Status Report. He reported that staff is preparing to restudy some of the alternatives that we looked at earlier, and study other alternatives that hadn't been considered. The scope of this study is being reviewed by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA), Orange County Flood Control District, the Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, the City of Yorba Linda, and the Citizen's Advisory Committee. Mr. Stewart also reported that on June 14, 2001, a workshop will be held with all of the major participants that we have been working with on the SARI Project. The workshop location will be in the City of Yorba Linda at one of the local elementary schools. The purpose is to update all of the stakeholders on the status of the project. Mr. Stewart also reported on fieldwork conducted this week to visually inspect the conditions of the Santa Ana River Interceptor within the river. A plan is being developed that will be brought before the Board for any interim protection measures that are needed. (14) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, reported on the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Status Report. The Committee agreed to change the GWRS Status Report from monthly to quarterly, and as needed to report on significant issues as they arise. Mr. Herberg pointed out that the Joint Cooperative Committee does report to the Board on a monthly basis on all the expenditures. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 May 17, 2001 - (15) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-i) a. PDC01-26 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a Sole Source Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for development of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2 for a total amount not to exceed $308,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. PDC01-27 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo & Moore, and Converse Consultants, to provide for materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-3313D, for an amount not to exceed$80,000 for each consultant for July 200112002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($300,000 total). MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. PDC01-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush &Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for an amount not to exceed $120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000 total). MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. PDC01-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for an amount not to exceed $70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($350,000 total). MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. v PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 May 17, 2001 e. PDCOI-30 Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, to provide additional construction support services in the amount of$3,710, for a total contract amount not to exceed$399,554. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve the recommended action conditional upon the Director of Engineering being provided an itemized breakdown of the costs of$3,710. f. PDCOI-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$8,810,056.56; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of $90,780, increasing the total contract amount to$8,900,836.56; and (3)Accept Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. g. PDC01-32 Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$54,073 increasing the total contract amount to$10,603,705. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carded to approve the recommended action. h. PDC01-33 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of $2,692 and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to$943,308, MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. 1. PDC01-34 Recommend to the Board of Directors to establish a budget of $144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection Project, Contract No. 11-14R. MOTION: It was moved, seconded,and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 May 17, 2001 (16) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (a) a. PDC01-35 Proposed FY2001/02 Capital Budgets. Information only item. The proposed Capital Budget for FY2001/02 was reviewed with the Committee, with a focus on new and revised projects. MOTION: It was moved,seconded, and duly carried to receive and file the information only report. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (20) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (21) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 7, 2001, at 5 p.m. (22) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: "� C� ail Cain Acting PDC Committee Secretary G:Mq.0l WndaNIX130J1V.fnW WS1701 PM MMW .d ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: ,���7.3/a/ TIME: 7 d /� (SIMONIAN) .....................ANDERSON................... ✓ — _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... - (LARSON) ........................ BOYD............................ _� r — (MILLER) .......................... BRADY ........................ _ (CRANDALL) ...................CARROZ20................. ✓ — (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... SL_ — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. r y — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... ���c — (GAROFALO) ................... GREEN......................... �� — (DUVALL) ......................... GULLIXSON................... ✓j — (DEBOLT).........................JEMPSA...................... 1i ✓ — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... �C — (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ �c ✓ — (BROADWATER).............. LEYES.......................... mac — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN...............�c ✓ — (CHRISTY)........................ MC GUIGAN..................�� ✓ _ (SIMONOFF) .................... MOORE........................ _� ✓ — (COONTZ)........................ MURPHY...................... a— e, — (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. J� ✓ _ (FRESCHI)........................PATTERSON................. — (KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ — (ADAMS) .......................... RIDGEWAY................... .... �G — — (DOW)...............................SIGLER......................... �/ ✓— — (SMITH. CHUCK) .............SILVA........................... —� — (BLAKE)............................WALKER........................ G �G — STAFF: Anderson Ghirelli ✓ Kyle ✓ Lawson ✓ Ludwin ✓ Miles ✓ Ooten ✓ Tomko ✓ Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 05/23/01 G:%wp.dlaladmin\BS\DIRECTOR4)lmctom Roll Call.dm 1 / , REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. yR�� � � n DATE: 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. /Y"^""�' Cvw� « . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) LA124--y P09TIX HOME ADDRESS: t o I WaTcj-APF DQ 4001 (number/street) I fE,4N c �y 9Zdbv (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: '* T,+R• -" Le,L•�I(p�p REPRESENTING: OGLAA�' Ot.�w (self/name of organi ation) 1// • REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: J a3 - D 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. I G_. NAME: (please print) (20 S eiv� HOME ADDRESS: to O y'"4'rV'6 t-� (number/street) �p ?r2a�- YJeu c_P.. I 07 O (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 'I I-� - G.35 KS- REPRESENTING: (self/name of o nization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS I ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) cU0 UJ,I�,,,'K, c)y : 'f ij HOME ADDRESS: Ld Zd Pa (number/street) sew " 90 7y 0 (city/zip code) � TELEPHONE: 7I -4 T�y /D ^ �J /`-' 7 REPRESENTING: d-('�d (self/name of o anization) \\lead\datal\wp.dtaWdmin\ S\FORMSVRequest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, FAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS VIIIAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: S —�.� ` till AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) l-� J� II N ALP, fl I HOME ADDRESS: 1 ? 3 � l F> RL UA I Al (number/street) NR M gy (city/zip code) p TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) p� ( t% '9 Pam'— -a U , � HOME ADDRESS: m � (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: y� ,i¢. (self/naa a of organization) \\lead\dalet\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORM"equest to Speak,doe REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS i ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: s Z-� J�� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) �M/� y��T7 -f4&nF- HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) Aje-w (city/zip c[�od/e) �/ TELEPHONE: 9 - �q� �`, �5� REPRESENTING: I/l1)-c (self/name of organization) \\lead\datai\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Requeet to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS A PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: /2 ( AGENDA ITEM NO. ? S NAME: (please print) t ) oal Xe 4ee HOME ADDRESS: Z20?01' 'r3lerac.K.. jo (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: `198 37Y4?AD4,y'n REPRESENTING: '!:�? 4, (self/name of organization) \llead\datai\wp.dtatadmin\BSIFORMS\Request to Speak.doo / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAYBE LIMITED TO FIV MINUTES. �"' n ff,, DATE: J V AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) AA HOME ADDRESS: ,. 4 (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) ceaw, 0 V f S eGee O G 7 U /3 --PAuL 1 WAS GIT/2 Fesr Md"rt-c, eu. Ac rg H1WR.OTMDMWWWORM SIGN-IN FORMAOC 0 �6ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT May 23, 2001 "hone` To the Chair and Members 17141962-2411 of the Board of Directors ..111,add.: Po Bo,8127 Subject: Board Letter Founcein Valley.CA 92728-8127 .44 M n Aa na: The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information iOB44 ells/avenue y y g' Fountain Veneyr ca on any of the items, please call me. 9210E-701 B Level of Treatment: The Big Ticket Item (On Several Fronts) Member Acteche r As you know, the issue of our ocean discharge has been the subject of numerous press Moo 0 reports and comments by members of the public at our board meetings. Increased Cities interest in this issue has been raised by the reports of elevated concentrations of bacteria along a stretch of beach north of the Santa Ana River. The events occur in the 8. . vicinity of Newland and Magnolia Streets and occur occasionally--mostly in the summer raa eaena Perk and mostly during high tide events. There are three possible explanations. The first is cypress input from the Banning Flood Control Channel and the Santa Ana River. Urban runoff Fountain ✓alley FullerWn and seabirds could be contributing elevated bacterial counts that are mobilized by the Garden C cva inward and outward rush of seawater in these inland waterways, the influence of high HuntingWn Reach Irvin tidal action. The second is input from a source or sources that we have yet identified, Le Habra despite two summers of extraordinary efforts on the part of the Sanitation District, the 1a Palme L.Alamitaa city of Huntington Beach, and the County of Orange. The third is input from our own Na porr Ranch outfall. According to a hypothesis first advanced by Dr. Stanley Grant of UCI, a unique Orange combination of marine conditions causes the edge of our discharge wecenne plume to be 9 9 Santa M. occasionally pulled in toward shore during the summer months of the year. seal Reach Banton r mn We are testing this hypothesis to determine whether our discharge plume is reaching Vila Perk r rba bnda shore by conducting an unprecedented marine monitoring effort this spring and summer. County of orange A million data points will be generated during this time. The data will be collected, compiled, analyzed and evaluated, with the help and independent review by a team of scientists from throughout Southern California. We hope to reach conclusions about s.nlc.ry olscrlota what the data mean by January of 2002. We intend to conduct the work in the full view costs Msae of the public and the press. Access to the data will be made available in as timely a MhMay c4r manner as possible. We are committed to allow the concerned public to look over our Water Districts shoulder during the monitoring work and as the data are evaluated. lmnc Ranch We have no reason to believe that wildlife, fishes or the marine environment are being adversely impacted by our discharge. More than 15 years of monitoring data convince of this. Nevertheless, this issue will also be addressed, but in a different context. The Sanitation District is obligated to apply for an ocean discharge permit every five years. 'To Protect the Public Haafth aW Me Environment through Excellence in Mosteweter Syareme- Members of the Board Page 2 May 23, 2001 Our permit renewal application must be submitted to EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board in December 2002. As a normal part of the application process, we must submit extensive marine monitoring data to demonstrate whether or not the quality of our discharge is adequately protective of the marine environment. This work will take many months to complete and we will make certain that our efforts are available to the scrutiny of any interested member of the public or the press. Regarding the technology and costs related to changing our current method of treatment, we expect to develop preliminary estimates between now and the summer of 2002. Our research staff will conduct small-scale testing of promising treatment technology, including microfiltration, for reducing the amount of pathogens in our effluent. We will also refine our understanding of all of the implications of more secondary treatment, including capital costs, operating costs, marine environment improvements, air quality impacts, trucking costs, and energy requirements. We will estimate the fair share costs that we will recover from all of our residential, commercial and industrial users through the new user fees and capital fees that will eventually be levied --depending upon what additional technology is determined to be needed. We will develop a robust and comprehensive community outreach and communication plan. We will make certain that the Board is fully aware of all public concerns and comments as it makes its decision about our December 2002 application. We intend for all relevant scientific, technological, financial, and community issues to be clearly communicated to the Board as it considers the application and its significant public policy implications. All of this will be reported to the Board and its committees over the next year and a half in workshops, committee meetings, and board meetings and written reports. Urban Runoff The District has approved the Orange County Flood Control District's (OCFCD) request to discharge dry weather urban runoff into the District's sewer system during the period of May 21, 2001 through September 14, 2001. As part of OCFCD's dry weather urban runoff plan for Huntington Beach's coastal waters, temporary diversion systems were installed in the Santa Ana River, Greenville-Banning, and Talbert channels during the week of May 7, 2001. OCFCD anticipates that these diversion systems will be operational by May 14, 2001; however, the discharge of dry weather urban runoff into the District's sewer system will not occur until May 21, 2001. Members of the Board Page 3 May 23, 2001 Similar to last summer, the temporary diversion systems will consist of a concrete block dam, submersible pump, and PVC pipelines. With a collective daily flow average of 1.4 million gallons a day, these diversion systems will be connected to either the City of Huntington Beach's sewer line or directly into the District's sewer system. As part of the District's dry weather urban runoff discharge requirements, OCFCD agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the District's Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, Resolution OCSD 01-07. Although the District has not yet reached a final written agreement with OCFCD or issued a discharge permit for the temporary diversion project, OCFCD anticipates that an agreement should be finalized and approved by OCFCD's governing board no later than July 24, 2001. We will continue our policy of accepting up to four million gallons a day from all dry weather urban runoff sources at no charge to them. If and when the total flow does reach four million gallons per day, then we will charge all of them to recover our costs of$321 per million gallons discharged. Community Outreach Children's Drinking Water Festival The Children's Drinking Water Festival held May 1 and May 2 at Hidden Valley Park in Irvine was a great success. During the two day festival, approximately 800 children participated in our"Wastewater Survivor Rapid Relay Contest."All of the children were given a button stating "I survived Wastewater Survivor" and a Clean Water Willie reflective zipper pull. Nine employees volunteered to run the adventure and many others helped in setting up and tearing down. The Children's Drinking Water Festival is a two-day event hosted by the Blue Planet Foundation. This year was the fifth year it has successfully taken place. More than 5,500 students attend the festival and participate in the various interactive activities. Open House The first OCSD public open house since 1983 drew a good crowd on May 5, 2001. Approximately 325 people attended the event that was part of a regional effort to kick off Water Awareness Month. Thirty-four of OCSD's finest volunteered their Saturday to show their OCSD pride and open our house to the community. Booths included: the biosolids bam, the urban runoff central station train, source control, emergency services, Huntington Beach summer studies, human resources, OCSD vector truck and mini- Members of the Board Page 4 May 23, 2001 crane, the cyber cafL'which included the OCSD computer internet display, wastewater jeopardy and karaoke. Our own experts gave tours. Ocean Outfall Group The Ocean Outfall Group, consisting of individuals from local coastal cities, held its last originally scheduled session on May 9, 2001. The group requested additional sessions with the biosolids group, a tour of the water district and on future engineering projects. Those meetings have not been scheduled yet. The Ocean Outfall Group was invited in for several education sessions beginning in January. They have learned about source control, biosolids management, maintenance and operations and our ocean-monitoring program. They have also toured Plant 1 and Plant 2. Newport Back Be On Earth Day, OCSD hosted an informational booth at the Newport Back Bay Earth Day celebration. General information and literature specific to the Back Bay Trunkline Sewer Repair and Rehabilitation Project was distributed. Three members of the communications team and project manager Mark Tomko manned the booth. Approximately 1,000 people attended the festival held at Shellmaker Island. Project-related Outreach Back Bay Trunkline On May 3, Mark Tomko provided a presentation on the Back Bay Trunkline Sewer Repair and Rehabilitation Project to the Upper Newport Bay Naturalists. Approximately 40 members heard an hour-long presentation regarding the project, examined the cured in place pipe materials and diagrams. The group was supportive of our efforts and offered any assistance that they could provide. Santa Ana River Interceptor Line The first citizens advisory committee for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line relocation or protection project was held on May 8. The citizens advisory committee consists of residents and business owners in the neighborhoods directly and indirectly affected by the project. Members of the Board Page 5 May 23, 2001 Dave Ludwin, Blake Anderson and Lisa Lawson provided a general overview of the Santa Ana River Interceptor line, its purpose and role for Orange County residents and businesses. A project status was shared and general discussion about neighborhood issues and how to best communicate with the members and the entire community. The next meeting will be held in a couple of months when there is more progress on the alternative review. A Fair Opportunity for Board Members to Participate Come join us at this years Orange County Fair July 13 - 29. It is the perfect opportunity to talk to interested Orange County residents about important OCSD issues. The Fair is open Thursday through Sunday from 10 a.m. until 11 p.m. and Monday through Wednesday 12 p.m. until 11 p.m. We are looking for volunteers to help staff our booth. If you are interested, please contact Lisa Lawson at(714)593-7120. Sign up early to get the best shifts. If you'd like to drop by and visit, we'll be in a comer booth in the Orange County Building. You Look Marvelous[ We are currently in the process of creating new and revising existing literature that will work together to create an overall consistent identity of OCSD. A general brochure for the District is in its fourth draft and will be completed within a few weeks. An ocean discharge permit fact sheet, Back Bay Trunkline fact sheet, Urban Runoff Diversion fact sheet and several biosolids fact sheets have been developed. A new informational pocket folder and presentation template will be produced shortly. Orange County Community Indicators The second annual Community Indicators Report was released and provided to attendees at the State of the County conference on May 8 in Anaheim. The report measures the overall wellbeing of the Orange county community. It uses a range of indicators to track broad, countywide economic, social and environmental trends. Identified in the report is coastal water quality. It contains a one-page summary explaining the number of beach mile days lost due to ocean water closures for 1999, and causes for closures from 1995 — 1999. The source of information is the Orange Members of the Board Page 6 May 23, 2001 County Health Care Agency. The report states that in 1999 there were 156 beach mile days lost due to ocean water closures. The primary cause for closures was sewage pipeline blockages in 1999 and pipeline breaks in 1998. There were 276 unauthorized waste discharges in 1999, up from 76 in 1990. The reason for the pipeline failures is debated, but possible causes include aging sewer infrastructure, need for increased pipeline maintenance, uncharacteristically wet weather or a combination of all. The report states that poor water quality leading to postings is largely attributed to urban runoff, and recognizes that local agencies are taking steps during dry weather periods to divert urban runoff flows into the sewer system. A graph shows the number of ocean water closures from 1995-1999 and causes including pipeline breaks, pipeline blockages, pump station failures, treatment plant discharges, collection system storm water surcharges, and urban runoff. Of these causes, treatment plant discharge is the smallest number of occurrences contributing to ocean water closure — only one event in five years according to the Health Care Agency's data. Media Coverage • In the last month, OCSD has received media coverage from KCBS Channel 2, KOCE, OCN, KFWB radio, Times Orange County edition, and the OC Register. The issues covered centered around the beach and ocean studies in Huntington Beach — prompted by our press conference, and the County of Orange's urban runoff diversions, which divert flows to the OCSD Huntington Beach Plant. • Board members can expect to receive a call from the Times Orange County Edition inquiring about our ocean discharge permit and board member opinion of the permit. The Times has asked various members about their support of the renewal application in 1989. Board members are welcome to call Lisa Lawson to talk about some of the message points already shared with the reporter on this issue. She can be reached at (714) 593-7120. • The Orange County Register reporters have been spending time at OCSD reviewing applications for our cooperative projects. As you will recall, the cooperative projects is a program where OCSD provides matching grants to member agencies who submit projects that will help reduce inflow and infiltration water into our facilities. Members of the Board Page 7 May 23, 2001 The Register is researching local sewer systems, maintenance schedules, operation costs, etc. We can expect to see a series of articles in the near future. OC Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Grease OCSD staff is working with the County of Orange and other entities on a coordinated response to the findings and recommendations identified in the OC Grand Jury report on grease. Their report was released in April. We have proposed that the County, the Sanitation District and the many local sewering agencies here in Orange County craft a joint response to the Grand Jury or at least coordinate our responses. As you will recall, the Grand Jury is recommending that uniform grease ordinances be adopted and enforced countywide, that grease management training be required of restaurant workers and that grease trap inspections be incorporated into the county's existing restaurant inspection program. These are all very complex issues and various agencies may have differing points of view on them. OC Grand Jury Report on Urban Runoff The Grand Jury intends to release a report on urban runoff in June. They will be conducting an "exit interview"with sanitation district staff and several other agencies prior to the release of the final report to give us a last chance to comment on its accuracy. I anticipate that I can provide an outline of the findings at the June Board Meeting. Odor Complaints Attached is a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I have included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. o g, Members of the Board Page 8 May 23, 2001 If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. A&, Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:pjm G I"DTAU MIMGMLLETIERS TO THE 50 =1OR3D1.WL Attachments Date: February S,2001 Orange County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2001 puNr No.1 pp pp Jan Feb Mar t A r Mai Jun Jul Au SOP Oct Nov Dec 1I1T Y.. N Ino Y22 es aum reiawe Total: H. 0 M M M M M M 10 PLANT N0.2 yy y yy Jan Feb Mar Apr >rli Me Jun Jul Ada SOP Oct ; Nov 1 Dec rd 2l4 no 3I29 yes 4/2 yB8 511 e 413 a Sl9 s 9/15 Z4 no wm. rel.na Total: 0 1 3 2 Colleegon Svslems PP 11 1 Jan I I Feb Mar Apr 4 Me Jun Jul AUGt Sao Oct ! Nov & Dec 1Po ro L1 rw 311e no trn ro -- -K rl9 3119 10 t20 m Mile. Iw 2RT no' 2I2T no' 2Ry no' z7no' 2RB no oaaea wtea con.:Total a Takl 0 Tobl 0 To Total Total Total Trial Total Total Total TONI RJO:YSH'011 This spreadsheet does not Include In-house odor complairds g:lexccl.dlatom\Odor Complaint Log.xls W(VI k Place CAREERS , MANAGEMENT, SUCCESS Rethinking Employee Evaluations Most firms use them but are based labor attorney and organizational Coens and Jenkins say yes. "Appraisals trainer Tom Coens and consultant Mary try to serve several different functions, unhappy with the process. Jenkins, co-authors of "Abolishing Per- which is part of the problem;' Jenkins Some observers say the concept forma tce Appraisals: Why They Backfire said. "We would suggest'debundling' the Deeds to be updated. and Wharto Do Instead"(Betrett-Koehler, fuPctions�rganizational Improvement, p 2000). feedback, coaching, development, com- Coens and Jenkins believe performance pensation decision-making and legal By SUSANVAUGHN reviews are a remnant of an earlier era documentation—and assigning individual SPECIAL To ME TIMES and may not be appropriate for today's systems to handle each." performance reviews can be agony for workplace. Harried managers might grouse about managers and subordinates alike. "For so long, we've been redesigning the preparatory work needed to do this, Managers dread them, fearing chat- appraisals because of their dismal track Coens and Jenkins concede. But in the forges and damaged work reladonships— records,and to little avail;'Jenkins said long run,they say,the managers and their never mind the lost hours filling out The process remains an imperfect organizations might benefit. forms. subordinates worry that less-than- means of measuring and rewarding em- Motivation to change, the fuel that stellar ratings will mean a puny raise or ployee behavior, despite hundreds of sparks Improved performance,must come placement on an upcoming layoff list. books, articles, instructional videos and from within employees.And performance Although eight out of 10 American symposiums on the procedure and ways appraisals aren't crafted to address that. workplaces use the review process, about to reinvent,reform and revitalize it.But is Their paternalistic nature is partly to 90%are dissatisfied with it,said Michigan- there a better way? Please see Reviews,W3 Cos Angeles dimes y SUNDAY ..rf:.. APRIL8,2001 / W W W.IATIMES.COMIWORKPIACE Gt ALGOL0IS / Porinanmas Mary Jenkins and Tom Coens, co-authors of "Abolishing Performance Appraisals: Why They Backfire and What to Do Instead;'believe performance reviews are a rem- nant of an earlier era and may not be appropriate for today's workplace. LOS ANGELES TIMES SUNDAY,APRIL 8,2001 W3 B Reviews: Give Review survival Guide Workers More As difficult as R Is io deliver bad news,it is no easier to receive it.In highly charged emotional situations,especially when we Involvement feel judged or criticized,our listening skills break down.Our heart races.Our breath quickens.Here are some tips to help Continued from wi you accept evaluations with dignity: blame. 1.Before a performance review,compile examples of work During reviews, supervisors in done well and compliments received from colleagues.Include parental roles critique behaviors of documentation of personal and professional attributes, employees in duldren's roles and personality strengths and communication skills. mandate specific actions to be changed. Rewards and punish- 2.Create a list of things to improve.Prioritize yourweaknesres menu are meted out accordingly. and select three to work on immediately. Supervisors, rather than em- 3.During the review,tell yourself,'I need to listen to this.It will ployees, control the scheduling of help me grow personally and professionally.' the sessions. However, feedback 4.Stay present and tuned in to what you are hearing. would be better utilized if it were Initiated bywurkers,Coens sad S.Be as objective and unemotional as possible. "The fact is, people are pretty S.Do not mtemupL eager to learn how they can be 7.Summarize and restate what you hear to ensure you heard it more effective in their work"said correctly. Lynn Summers, vice president of B.Ask yourself,*Is the feedback specific and actio"danted?' research at Performaworks in Ra- leigh, N.C. Summers advocates specifics so you can understand the critique. employee performance manage- 9.Create an action plan for attaining your goals. ment,in which the supervisor pro- 10.follow up to assess your progress. vides coaching and feedback If you prepare yourself by reviewing your strongest qualities and throughout the year. view the negative characteristics as vehicles for self- improvement,you might even begin to welcome critical Tougher Than Eycl feedback from others. - Coteau and Jet khhs acknowledge pseryloam axrsni�axnAswdales.secxaarbawa cuwmmkanore that the performance review proc- ess isn't about to disappear from the corporate landscape any time soon.And for those who must give Others,hoping to,avoid conflict of New York Buffalo. He cited w reviews,challenges are mounting. and shattered relationships, give examples technological break- Boom have less time to observe their employees overly positive re- downs and quality control prob- staff.A growing number are being views or allow employees to bully lems asked to supervise from afar, them into raising ratings.Or they'll At their hest, performance re- sometimes mfles or states away commit another offense: They'll views should be collaborative from their employees. decrease ratings to comply with events, said Arky Ciancutd, faun. "I ask people,'Haw many of you budget restraints. der of the leamfng Center, a San can remember when your.boss It happens more often than Anselmo, Calif.-based research spent uninterrupted time for an anyone would he wilting to ad- center,and co-author of"Bunt on hour reviewing what you do?'" out"Coleman said. Trust:Gaining Competitive Advent. said Joseph Weintraub, professor Many of these scenarios can [age in Any.Organization" (Con- of management at Babson College give rise to Ha problems later on, temporary Books,2tl(10). in Wellesley,Mass."And this is the an,chairman of -Employees should be able to person who's determining how employment practice group at De- participate, in setting objectives much money you'll be getting" chert law rum in Philadelphia. - - and express their needs for feed. Many bosses in today's work. back and coaching said Bob Rog. place don't understand thew sub. Are They Even Fait? to, president of Development Di. ordinates'jobs, so are not.able ro mensions International in appropriately coach them or sug- As workers depend mom heavily Pittsburgh Best concrete ways in which they ontofleagues to get jobs done,the They also should be encour- can improve.Coens said. task of reviewing individual per- aged, without few of reprisal, to Some, overworked and short of formance is becoming murkier, report any employer-generated time, haphazardly fill out reviews Coem said Can team members be goals that they believe are mused. or commit the "recency error": fairly appraised when their out. utic, unmanageable or humtrat. They focus heavily on employees' comes are dependent on the ran. ingly vague. latest weak and all but ignore their tributions of their peers? It may be cold comfort but ram- past months'contributions. It's unlikely,experts say. - plaints about performance reviews "The tone of the review ends up "There are so many things in smoothing new.In the 4th century being based on the last project the the system that have a huge im- Wei Dynasty,for example, a disap- person worked on before the boss pact on your performance, yet pointed Chinese writer lamented: filled out this review," said Bill your ability to control them is '"The imperial rater of nine Bud" Coleman, vice president of com- minimal," said Jerry Newman, seldom rates men according to thew pensation for Salary.com in professor of organization and hu. merits but always according to his Welle_slev.M.U. man res ,.r car Crarn rhniwrsiry 11ac ono A�.hnx" / Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section I Page # Sate � bjgctIP Orange County Register S, tists to probe sea qu i t' Environment & A new, $41 million study The six-mgnth project said George Robertson, a se- will Elkus On bacteria off HilI1t1I1gtOA Beach. 'could force the Orange nior scientist at The sanitation County sanitation District to district. "Our Primary goal is change the way it puiilps- to jtnderstand transport of By OLIVIA HAWKINSON along guntit)gton State waste water out to sea if sci- our(Waste-water)plume." The Orarge cwnty R"lster Beach artists find that the practice The . sanitation district, This latest ,probe is the *datens swimmers' health,! which is leading the study of. MYNTIMOTON BEA. third 5incc high. paa(eria tOnc optbn.intend' gsew- the outfall pipe area.will start Scientists this gtQn@(;'v�ill counts closed miles of corut- cage treatment,could ost the- the probe'May.2L launch a $41 million study lineto swimming in&99,and district - and .ratepayers - The district Will deploy a aimed at " daterrI fling it will dwarf"past studies in millions of dollars. " team of about 150 people six whether treated Sewage terms Of manpower, money �-It's going to be a real im-! times during the summer,to pumped to the ocean i u- spent ind data collected,offs- pertain step for us in under- smdy35squazemilesofocean ences high bacteria levels cWs said Tuesday. standing wbat's going am- off Huntington state and city beaches - a ,rectangular area roughly bounlKd by Goltien- west Street,t1eM7ewporf P!qr, the shoreline and about'siz stiles out to sea Six boats and submersible water-sampling equipment will be used to collect htiw dreds of water samples, then Send the water to labs to test for bacteria,salinity and other components. Counry and city officials OCEAN -PAGES orange County Sanitationtation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Su ject� w Orange County Register ae 5 s�9�o/ OCEAN: mystery erybIge larys bacteria , "May?I.Orange County Sani(alion Dislfid Scientists will f Scientists ranch a54.1mlllion sxmontn study to try todelermine- ;'xumhgtal�'; to study whether treated sewage Mach Pier Dumped treated ocean could influence the high pow er plant Intake Glue oagteda levels found m� along Huntington bacteria Hate Beach. panne a Ocean problem ` over.. .. Thestutlyarea will cover sanitation _ PROM PAGE 1 about 35 square miles alpellne have already spent more than $4 million investigating the " mysmrious bacteria plaguing i011ui0""s't°u"gse"naten bided i The Register Huntington Beach waters. The sanitation district will �We aic All Orange County resi- pay $2.6 million to $2.9 mil- Far ndanRdm abet ew study,pee dents win have to ful the bill Bon out of its capital improve- ewhv-csdrar' for cleaner water,said Shawn ment'budget for this suin- Boyd,aSealBeach�ity Costs, - mei s study. beach.The outfall pumps 240 cil member and sanitation "Ratepayers will not see an million gallops of wastewater district board member. Boyd increase this year," Lawson four miles dffahore each day. said he ailvocates placing a said. "It's something they've If it's proven the power bond measure on a `.future already paid for." plant is sucking waste water countywide ballot to fund The county, National Wa- back to shore, the sanitation more sewage and urban tun4 ter Research Institute and the district faces a tough choice: off treatment. AES power plant will also spend SI70 million to build a "If ocean water quality is a contribute money for the new pipe, spend $20 million major concern to people,then": study. more per year to disinfect_we ought to be willing to antein Scientists theorize that the waste water pumped through up and pay the price for it1"I AES power plant's cooling the current pipe, or boost all Boyd said. system may suck bacteria sewage ,treatment, which from the sanitation district's could cost more than -Contact Hawilmm at 014)44560 a.� outfall pipe back to the state S300 million. ohawkirmn@WegMercom Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject. � „ Los Angeles Times T Sewage Fears May Close Beach Again BySF,EMA MEHTA to spend millions to further redticg TIMES' AFF WNITEP bactzpa levels in the-,ef0uent<f{ Orange ran a Cou [ s ublic health pipes gffshare. R S y' P Public Health Officer Mark Hory office,it Tuesday he is considery tonsaid he soon may make a"semi- ingdosfrlg a stretch o(Hyntington permanent"decision to close the Beach's Shorelme this summer be- beach or possibly post health wam cause treated sewage released four (ng signs alerting swdmmers. Am mlles,ofhhore may be drifting back other option would bolo continue toward the beach. making decisions based on regular In a separate move, the Orange water-quality samples. ..' County Sanitation District on Tues- Through ch of last summer, day announced a $9.1-million Prot closures conmu a tinued to plague act to netermina whetper the stretch of beach a quarter to a half treated sewage from its outfml was mile an either side of Magnolia AN,, the cause of the devastating do- can, sures of much ofHuntington "It.boils down to what dowe feel Beach's shoreline in the summer of we need to do to madmize protec- 1999. thin of public health,"Horton said. If there is a connection between "We're considetir)g theoptlons." the outfall plume and pollution at Horton said°the amount of the.shoreline, the waste water money allocated fOT,the study re- treatment agency could be forced Pleasesee BEACH,Bit ''P51)I``jUt10I1 ,y , KEY .... Tf1eo17C5 'wNer muff' a �'M,aHanq A$4.1-million watecqualiry � _�G:k^L!. ;ps AES study off Hunflng[oh Beach outen. ; will try to determine the cause of high dosed the . -qk.• `�•(yaµ, levels that posed the shoreline ua E in summer 1999,Scientists theorize that high tides aqd/or ap. No, underwater Waves cause ' 'kae sewage ham a sanitation plant Serage 5�u,eoanae eaww outfall to flow ashore. oun.n 's,�clro•a:mn HIGH TIDE THEORY UNDERWATER WAVE THEORY (Occurs nearshore) (Ortvrs offshore) i Sewage below thermocline dSH;with Underwater waves llhsewage from fide.Hot water from outhall cames ocean floor.Sudace waves carry sewage to surface. sewage ashore. /Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper I section Page# Date � R 3 Sltt Los Angeles Times BEACH: Closures Loom Again , i Costinved from Bl - was closedml3�uufmgtonBeach a! surhas ariim4iUt],m�4lp de ter retepayers,will not Bee a tat id- fleets how seriously officfals are ter a water sa i'�f'remrded ex mmewhethar Uja 4ewage+plumefa erease:bfDcials omit. taking the possibility;that e�.ueat _tjlame pigh� a rla reatlmgs presortOlin silacaWl6" G ndgretuigbackto;shore. auspected�the b.a ,Stdlmen ''� Using turiv Ad(kd Past closures have affected ody a ry��aay.humaa sewage net likag'e' sled for d' portions of the citys shoreline but reaching the beach. obmmon cfi laundr9 the stakes still are enosnous.Hun- ,§yrlate August,more than tom detergent -' 'IAaa Lawson spokesvoman for tington Beach's 8.5 miles of beach 6IWof ocean from'Goldenwest' Devices will measure currents thc'sanitation dhMdcV,said that if attract an average of 10 million Street to the Santa Ana River water temperature and meteoro-o- the'atudy detesmtn4s:tfie sewage visitors a year But tha"pereretent.-m th wa& aced oft 2- ftent oudttios "awustie plume9s'responsdge forthe water closures m fl999 keptlejtodda away, Cause of tfiR canicontasry'nation the g'g@�f� would hurting thgmty omYand tar Una ta7q• °r the 35 �hfJef4change operdfil"miss niehitig its`eput�tt'as Surf City. a{er after balcmg sewer tapes �ytud, area ant le'adluUonsih"Elu�e dism- City fit at acted rauttousy wer¢rivled outiae the cause" al � rey� fpCH'ng 'isewaan iolet to the ro k b" h closures � m i speed and duet P sp Oaf _gxi&ltiee add':rPaeamE"a syevui" PIR0a light Nfiiehwoihon„ orderbyth,nest t.`.,. .patted urban rnndff notbTof >Tire UM fi aft t' ants Ana orb a t1 reat-'"fheY +teed tip, Slq�, g law, .Talbert Ma4eh andYhaSap er re o8rpay cos mettl a fywhist as and they nreed,Sfi do ttthleiggt;( .gtaer IaeCisufomer when'; �, t,a - to ltac`kh4w mu- u $ �" ""'; n Huntmgtor�Beffch city spok'esrmars.. IeM1misewere�high,.the 6eadhag4jei4 du evs after"¢nterin6 the ;� S re�ta ale led Deft RichtoBatellatdthsaid;, in suin ynot p"�mq hat the o p j Yeaz asimilar study aPnftg matswiU one I be tainted. v receive a ot( pthis am0- job• tinned fhb Oman o'ft$imtington roar,H t6 Care AgR py.ppoks$-: He addbd li*mr Y t:'H Ijeachatrq fuchna womatt f4mca urc eaitl site they're ta"(pke- thoss �Sl g, mom" Una is haying "t Cry,topny -4 Wafs-d drastic actions T�lieY.need to he::Th�rY s o $2 S,'c�,,on of the lyet bus a s..,tY1at ma based on some data—either smen- In November,UC Irvine t ?'R, S h -,KalW at& agep4y;t�nds to prefer the aide of tBic data or testing data tietStanleyGppt offereda w# ceutmn: �l {Lorton safdthat h?11 probably the Orange Cdimty`Sanitg� . and th4 Coypty health vt'.jots .were make a dect��wpn"tiefore the swim Wets treated YreAage ' 69`of out alUomta prAssed py envirro ate {or season gets fNo(pr`along"but that -tom milts off is ' £Ed albs,_ h e , msiatim pressure Gum lonal pohti- anytlecisoncotgtlolgebaeatlon .back to thesmP 4p`tpry hdseZipWer Plants cianato reopen the beach m late the results of in eflidtee '"'tion oftid�-im e d e'ooledby ima, a Hmt is than summmlg99. .... Under state]WIlhealth officials a local power play fosean.feit pumped ba erocean has "Based minor experience inHIN Call- must close beaches if they know coolingsyatero-f. t t£ N RW. pit 'W0:The Call and also then, 1 have complete sewage is present..B bacteria levels The sedtaypa y�nt 'tf f may r4^ faithin the county health.ofDcmi'N are FUgh becauseof runoff,Dachas are will test Grad` dialing ry "the'efinp'e`ny to+pay$1 mB- Orange Countyto Make the ca'y;' generally areposLeda4aniing Saiin- one 24-hour scientific survey in lion if the agency approves a plan said Christopher J.Eirahs,Aireftor mars about potenYlal`risks. Hay and fwe.48-hour surmysfrom itorestart two mothballed,gas-rued of the Son Clements-bated Su*1_ But to cases like Huntington Juneto September. generators at the plant to boost the, derFoundation. Beach when health officials only Reseeircheiswilltakewatersam- state's electrical supply. - I "The county heaith,oWcer Sias suspect sewage is present, they pies every fivemeters from the sur, - The sanitation district money is demonstrated a conservative'and have discretion in how to respond face to the ocean Door.Tests for sa- coming from its capital improve- consistent approach.I think cadre In JWy 1999,a mile of shoreline unity,bacteria and sewage markers ment projects budget.The tllslrict's in pretty good hands." 4 III,, , ap ,pN a W� N4VE F�L-L C'CCOP- V52SiO S 31' -TW — 3�5T ASk- .` Urban Runoff Diversions Q nn MV '�•t Background Dry weather urban runoff is contaminated wafer that is generated from Inigating lawns,washing cars and hosing down driveways and anything released Into stormdralns during dry weather,which flow into the ocean. People often forget that this flow can be filled with pathogens,toxlcs, pesticides and other ra materials and have the potential to contaminate beaches, leading to beach closures. The outcome of the summer of 1999 Huntington Beach closure investigation indicated that the dry weather urban runoff flowing Into the Pacific Ocean, .= . through the Talbert Channel, may have caused or contributed to the shoreline contamination due to high bacteria levels. This event triggered the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)to begin the dry weather urban runoff diversion L: — program. • OCSD's Program As part of a regional project to control urban runoff, OCSD has agreed to reroute the dry weather urban runoff from stormwater pump stations and storm channels located In the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Newport Beach(Figure 1 and Figure 2), Huntington Bcorh Pump Station Talbert Channel stornwatnr Well Diwnlan Pump s� • Dlraniun thatsF,�r "IP�1•m! bfarnrBm -�!A, `;y ' D,Ir,W.Berms • CountySanitation u istrict Vision— • Diversion Location PIA)ODC'ONTROLCI WNELSANDPUMPINGS'1'ArroNS � In addition, projects LOCAITI)WITHIN 1).F.G & H WATERSHEDS are under way In2nd water resource _=r-- Crystal Cove to • / protect blologically m.r_ sensitive areas. m VI t"' "a"fir mire Afir�xtiix mo« PFAA iiAR 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA L �•vf.,f� .Aor visit ourweb site A DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF cumantyuruwrytecn OCSD/050901/Urban aunoD.rdr paps I In December 1999,OCSD's board of directors agreed to temporarlly accept and r divert dry weather urban runoff Into Its sewer system for treatment and release to the ocean. In April 2000, the board adopted a resolution for accepting urban runoff on a long-term basis on days when It does not rain. The resolution Is designed to: minimize adverse Impacts on coastal beaches and public health, whlle maintaining the high quality of OCSD's primary function-collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary wastewater to the sewer System. Once again, on September 27, 2001, the board amended the resolution and adopted a second resolution, which Included the following requirements: of The amount of dry weather urban runoff flow will not exceed 10 million gallons per day ' • Dischargers located within OCSD's service area will not be required to pay any fees associated with the approved discharge of dry weather urban runoff Into OCSD's sewer system If the total volume of all dry weather urban runoff discharges does not exceed 4 million gallons a dcP If the flow exceeds 4 million gallons a day,the dischargers will pay for the Alk dill"Ad cost of their discharge, which Is $321 per million gallons. • Dischargers located outside OCSD's service area that OCSD permits _ to discharge dry weather urban runoff to the sewer system will pay a cost of$321 per million gallons discharged. • Over the next three years OCSD Intends to evaluate the sources of dry weather urban runoff, the qualty and quantity of dry weather urban runoff discharges, and the costs associated with discharges. • OCSD will accept urban runoff throughout the entire year on days when B Is not raining. • Discharge Permits The discharger must complete an application to obtain wastewater discharge permit and supply certain required technical Information. The permit Issued by OCSD will set the terms and conditions of OCSD's waste- water discharge regulations including the general operational requirements for dry weather urban runoff diversions. In addition, the discharger must enter Into an agreement with OCSD. • Current and Proposed Diversions DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF DIVERSION FLOW rwe of DallyAmoge ..� DBctwpers LacaSon N a g System `M, (tuition StaNs Date Galbns Per Daft aN of ffun" Sfor rn ofen Hwfi gton tOn 9 F=P Station 0.9 DhchagYg 19�to Beach Beach Dnorooro eM MESEM FLOWS 0.9 IMm Roach Nport Sforrmalm Water MetBeach 1 p Sion n 0.4 Raposnc �l� SMorm N�orl Bsoch I Stormtlr n 0.2 DbcwroV 2001 to h Beach Dversbn sent 3-Channel l�~ CArersbm: Cwnry of HwWglen Gneewre Orange Beach 4 Banning.& 1 Ropowl 2001 Santo Ma rare I-slorr voter Pump Station 11r,PROPOSED AND CURREM FLOWS 2.5 OCSD/050901/Urban Runoff..<dr Po Page 1 of 2 r 8 ROWN A0ALOW ELL Want to subscribe to the *�/(�gtE12 -rNteSrR.uctuli>: SoCal Water Resources Structuring WIN for Success Nov _ A MI>Ee4� News? We cover it all, "yqr ti sAo everyday: Water,waste- CASA and AMSA should support WIN as well as pa.nrr ux+.� water,flood control, and responsible reserve funding C' coastal water quality. P 9 fN1W7Ysr &oAN Fu"95 It's frost T1 wAteF 4ASTH✓AI'& [05I01/01, Commentary by Blake Anderson] Visit our subscription siteEHc��I M vErNlr.rs at: 1 believe that that the WIN initiative must have two elements to be effective and to become law: t, r6kz�t4 http://204.212.225.138/ FkCtO R'E5 socalh2onews/subscribe/ First, local share funding. Like the original Clean Water Act, a local subscribe.htm share must be part of the formula—possibly a 75:25 federal/local share for critical situations and a 50:50 share for non-critical Or, simply e-mail the situations. The locals must be encouraged to raise fees for either editor at pay-as-you-go funding or to pay off local financing. kharlow(a?home.com with your name,title, antl Elected officials must bite down on the fee bullet now. Federal money agency. may give them reason to do the right thing and give them the political cover as well.The original CWA was a terrific jump start to get funding going.The WIN program will take the nation to the next level. If the CWA was the equivalent of the Saturn booster engine,then WIN is the second stage rocket to get the payload Into orbit. Brown and Caldwell Islas von 2606 sane zoo Second,asset management. In exchange for federal funding, the Wine,CA 92606 9 g g, (949)Tfi0-8182 phone local entities must adopt, in both policy and in practice, basic (949)474.0940 fax elements of asset management. Regular maintenance, regular inspections, regular publicly-reported inventories of the infrastructure asset base, a financial plan for short term and long term rehabilitation and replacement,a designated reserve policy, etc. Asset management is absolutely necessary to keep the nation's and the states'water protected from public sewage systems. With these two elements in place,the federal government will have reason to help the locals out this one time.This gives the federal government a way to motivate local governments to get off the dime and invest in their infrastructure. C� xFmRNIA �Abclh CASA and AMSA should Support WIN. For some CASA and @F SAN i trrrtoN f1C't�ci�5 AMSA members, there's reason to say"no"to this program.They've got their funding in place.They've been responsible.They've done the right thing.They,for good reason,resent those agencies that �SUCr A-tt� u have not been responsible. Fine. All good points. F But there are some realities. For the big regional systems that have satellite systems, 181 and upstream spills are having major impacts. The aging satellite systems upstream of the regional systems cause NAgT�A� Gl�OV� all sorts of storm water related problems.The public does not differentiate between sewer spills and which public agency is responsible. They just hear the word"spill."The political pressures mount.And it doesn't even matter if the spills are in a particular community. Headlines about LA have an impact on attitudes in Orange County. And visa versa. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/asset/05-01_win_and_am.htm 05/02/2001 Page 2 of 2 The effect?A legislator in Sacramento or Washington DC decides something must be done,a bill goes into the hopper,and may we go,trying to bat away one more law or regulation that makes it Impossible for the good guys to operate sensibly and cost effectively. The CASA members have another reason to back WIN:The Little Hoover Commission on Special Districts. CASA must take a proactive and offensive position on all of the criticism that Little Hoover leveled on wastewater treatment special districts.We were criticized for having money in the bankl For goodness sake,we ought to be held up as examples of responsible public agencies.The cities and other entities that are cash-poor should look to us with admiration.But that won't happen If we try to be quiet and defensive. We should be celebrating and publicizing our financial strengths,not sulking around about them. The CASA board and staff should be producing brochures about how much money we have in reserves and why we need it and where we are going to spend it.We all should be telling our member agencies about the frighteningly huge and real shortfalls that are present throughout California.We should be asking the public whether we want to look like shiny new California or the rusty aging Midwest.We should be making the argument that public infrastructure is the basis for quality of life and Pacific Rim competitiveness. CASA should get behind WIN, insisting on a fee-based system that gets local dollars to match federal dollars. CASA and AMSA have meetings in May.CASA ought to revisit this Issue In Yosemite.AMSA ought to revisit this Issue In Washington DC.CASA should take a position that is formally conveyed to AMSA for its consideration. I'll be at CASA. . Blake Anderson is General Manager of the Orange County Sanitation District http://204.212.225.138/socaUi2onewslasset/05-01_win_and_am.htm 05/02/2001 I µ� SAft��tal'tcw pts7�'ccT is ,4 FpvNDl1.,Q MEM6foL OF x{� oC-rJ�itoJ o� M�'H2oWf.-t'M�) amsa� S�E � t�s. F.,L_t_y oP TL{�c PoR:c-k*7oN EF TLtE CCvt�l-QY �4EAK ct-tb fs.SSe'c 1At7CA/ CleanWaterNews Dedicated to Environmental Improvement for Over 30 years WIN Rally to Mobilize Congressional Support at AMSA Policy Forum AMSAs 2001 National Policy AMSA members will have the unique MNow Rally to Cop Hill Visits Forum& 31st Annual Meeting. opportunity to hear from and talc with The aftemoon of May 22 has been set May 19-23. will focus on the latest key legislators and regulators who will aside for AMSA members to visit their regulatory and legislative developments provide their unique perspective on congressional delegations on Capitol Hill in the nation's capital.This year's clean water in the new Administration ♦ con inued on page 2 Polity Forum, 71re New Political and the 107th Landscape... Moving POTW Agenda Congress. Forward,couldn't be more timely as many of the Association's priority The Forum presents issues are receiving a high level of a key opportunity attention from the new Administration to carry your -and the 107th Congress. agency's message to national policy Forum Program Packed with makers.Your National Policy Makers agency's support The new Administration and the 107th is essential to Congress brings many new faces to moving the POTW _ important regulatory positions and agenda forward. 1 1 1 within the leadership of congressional committees.Throughout the Foram AMSA Active in Support of WIN ANSA representatives appeared in Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) a variety of venues this month to and participated on a water infrasttuc- National Enviroomenol deliver the message to federal,state and ture financing panel convened during a Achievement Award Winners local government officials that more meeting of the EPA Environmental to be Honored of AMSKs 31 st money is needed for repair and replace- Financial Advisory Board's Cost Annual Meeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ment of the nation's water infrastructure Effective Environmental Management systems.AMSA staff discussed the Workgroup.AMSA staff and members legal Perspectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 recommendations of the Water also were active in a several sessions at NRC launches Study on Land Infrastructure Network's(WIN)Water the National League of Cities'(NLC) Application of Blosollds. . . . . . . . . . .6 Infrastructure Now.Recommendations Annual Congressional City Congress for Clean and Safe Water in the 21 si attended by thousands of municipal Century(WINow)report with Bush officials from around the country. Administration officials at the U.S. • continued on page 3 National Environmental Achievement Award Winners to be Honored at AMSA's 31 st Annual Meeting AMSA's 2001 Boeldert(R-N.Y.), structure.WIC is also working to build National Environ- Borski(D-Pa.),Bilirakis support for a renewed federal commit- mental Policy Forum& (R-Fla.)and Brown ment to funding American's clean and 31st Annual Meeting (D-Ohio)with 2001 safe water infrastructure. will highlight this year's Public Service Awards. National Environmental Pedersen to Receive Public Service Achievement Award Senator Smith serves Award of State level winners.Selected by as Chair of the Senate's Craig D. Pedersen,Executive Admini- AMSA's Awards Environment and strider,Texas Water Development Committee,this year's Public Works Board,is being recognized for his vital 24 award recipients will Committee. Smith role in the planing and development of be honored at the Policy firmly believes that water quality projects in the state of Foram's Welcoming Senator Robert Smith (RN.HJ "the Federal Texas. In 1997, he helped implement a Reception Sunday, will receive AMSA's 2001 Govemment must new state water plan created under May 20,andd during Federal Public Service Awards reassess how environ- Texas Senate Bill 1,the historic legisla- AMSA's Awards mental laws are regu- tion that established a water planning Luncheon on Monday,May 21.AMSA lated to ensure that we only use the framework for the state. is pleased to showcase the award winners best,peer-reviewed science and most in this issue of Clean Water News. cost-effective methods to meet our Norwood Town Manager and shared environmental goals." Chicago General Superintendent Senator Robert Smith and Local Public Service Honorees 'The Killer Bs'Honored with The"Killers Bs;'Reps.Boehlert,Borski, AMSA's Awards Committee selected Federal Public Service Award Bilirakis and Brown,were the driving John J.Carroll,Town Manager, AMSA's Public Service Award recog- force behind the formation of bipartisan Norwood, Mass.,and Vice Chairman, nizes public officials at the federal,state Water Infrastructure Caucus(WIC), Massachusetts Water Resources and local levels who have displayed which has mobilized Congress to address Authority(MWRA),as a 2001 Local extraordinary insight of the challenges our nation's water infrastructure funding Public Service Award Honoree.CaaoB is facing wastewater treatment agencies. needs.As co-chairs of WIC,"The Killer being honored for his efforts in guiding AMSA's Awards Committee is delighted Bs"educate fellow Members of the management of MWRA,and for his to honor Senator Robert C.Smith Congress on the current status and long-standing service as a member of (R-N.H.),and The Killer Bs—Reps. future needs of our nation's water infra- the MWRA Board of Directors. Hugh H. McMillan,General AMSA's 2001 Policy Forum, continued from Page 1 Superintendent, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater and meet with staff at EPA Headquarters. Capitol Hill reception in the Rayburn Chicago,Ill.,is also being honored Attendees are urged to make the most of House Office Building's Gold Room. with a Local Public Service Award for this opportunity to meet with clean water his many accomplishments and long policy makers and discuss national water AMSA is excited about this year's Fomm tenure with the District. He played an quality priorities as well as issues of agenda as many of the Association's pri- integral role in presenting the District's local concern—especially important this ority issues are taking center stage in our position that made combined sewer year with infrastructure funding receiv- nation's capital,and now is the perfect overflow projects grant eligible,which ing increased attention'inside the time for PCTWs from across the country led to the approval of the Tunnel& Beltway'and nationwide. to join AMSA to support essential initia- Reservoir Plan as the solution for tives that will benefit the clean water Chicago combined sewer overflow and Later that afternoon,Fomm attendees community for years to come. flooding problems.McMillan recently retired will join members of the House of as Chicago's General Superintendent. Representatives'Water Infrastructure Register Onliner Caucus to rally for'Water Infrastructure Save the dates,May 19-23,2001,to AMSA Recognizes Battaglia for NOW.'The WINow Rally will focus con- join us in DO Visit AMSA's Clean Water Local Award for Service Population gressional attention on the crucial need on the Web site for the most up-l"ate Less Than 250,000 for water infrastructure funding across the conference agenda and registration cape- This year,for the first time,AMSA is nation.After the Rally,join AMSA for a bilities,wivu•.mrsa-cleanrvaterorg. ■ presenting an additional award for local public service in communities serving less than 250.000 citizens.Leonard L. Commitee Chair,where he was instru- A Battaglia,Secretary of the Board of mental in initiating the AMS.A{EP-A NAT11O'NAL�L111(��� �] Directors for West County Wastewater Pretreatment Coordinators Workshop. EUU�1 O1L1Il,LU�I1� District,Calif.,has devoted over 25 years p jl m the District.His involvement began Presidents Award to be Presented to llChlQUe ,Ell AWARDS, with the creation of the District,which Hollander and Schatz ll lllt�Il Llll t,ll provided a more efficient disposal of The President,Award is given to Indl- wastewater for the region. viduals who have made a significant Also being honored wish a 2001 contribution toward achieving AMSA's President's Award is Lisa E. Hollander, Miele Awarded for goals and objectives.This year,AMSA Assistant General Counsel for the District. Distinguished Performance President,William Pugh,will be present- As Co-Chair of AMSA's Sanitary Sewer AMSA's Awards Committee selected ing the award to William B.Schatz and Overflow(SSO)Workgroup Hollander Robert P.Meile,Former Technical Lisa E.Hollander,both of Northeast has worked diligently to develop Services Department Head,Sanitation Ohio Regional Sewer District. AMSA's position on a national SSO Districts of Los Angeles County,Calif, regulation and has provided legal and and AMSA Board Member,as the win- William B. Schatz,General Counsel technical analysis on this critical issue. ner of the 2001 Distinguished for the District,was selected for this Performance Award.This award is pro- honor for his commitment to the Water Representative Saxton and Turner to seated to individuals that were past rep- Infrastructure Network(WIN). Schatz Receive Environment Award resentatives for AMSA member agencies represented municipal interests during AMSA's 2001 Environment Award, and maintained an active role during four intense,facilitated discussions that which recognizes individuals for out- their tenure.In addition to serving resulted in recommendations that boast an standing environmental service will be AMSA's Board,Miele played an vital unprecedented army of backers,including awarded to Rep.Jim Saxton(R-N.J.) role on several committees,notably as local elected officials,environmentalists, and Billy Turner,President of Columbus Vice-Chair of AMSA's Regulatory labor,engineers,contractors and waste- Water Works,Ga. Affairs Committee and as Pretreatment water and drinking water utilities. V continued on page 4 WIN Support, continued from page 1 WATER INFR TIRE NETWORK WIN Prominent on Capital Hill fall be peer reviewed and pub- Congressional hearings are On Capitol Hill,WIN members held an fished this summer. In a strong expected through the summer. educational session for staff of the show of support for WIN,Senators Northeast-Midwest Coalition,which is and Representatives on both sides of the Keep up-to-date on the latest news a bipartisan group comprised of 114 rep- aisle called for increased spending to in water infrastructure funding by resenlatives who recognize the common safeguard the nation's water and waste- visiting WIN's new web site at problems facing their states. water infrastructure systems.Additional www.win-waterorg.■ Later in the month,hearings on water - infrastructure funding needs were con- ducted in both the House and the Senate.Pat Kenney,Director of the - Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati,Ohio,testified on behalf of AMSA members before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Water Resources. Gloucester,Mass.Mayor Bruce Tobey represented the Water Infrastructure 'r -'�n, - ...v.d Network(WIN)at the kick-off hearing in the Senate Environment and Public Gloucester,Mass.,Mayor Brace Tobeypresented the Water Infrostrvclure Network's(WIN) Works Subcommittee on Fisheries, position before the Senate Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Water, Pat Korney, Wildlife and Water. Before the same Director of the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio,then made the case Senate Subcommittee EPA far Infrosbucture funding during his testimony before the House Subcommittee an water Administrator Christine Todd Whitman resources. "in an ero of unprecedented federal surpluses, I can't think of a better investment cited studies by both AMSA and WIN than the health of our citizens,the integrity of our environment and the economic well-being and told lawmakers she will ask that of our communities. Simply put, we can't afford to leave any community behind as we EP.4's gap analysis of the funding short- oddness the looming national water and wastewater infrastructure funding crisis.' The Delia Diablo Sanitation District. Branch/Big Crack Project: Reversing P NATIONAL Calif.,is also receiving a Research&- Stream Bank Erosion."The goal of this Hn TtlrQn Tj�r]� Technology Award for their"Power Plant initiative is to restore and improve the RLllul ll n Il Cooling Recycled Water Supply and carrying capacity of an urban steam and L^�1QTlelllell AWARDS Disposal Prolect."This project consisted to demonstrate to communities that soil L1LLiL BUJ L jj�I�IL jj(( of the development,construction and bioengineering techniques are just as operations of it req clod water plant, effective as typical"hard engineering" cooling tower blow down water disposal techniques,and more beneficial to National Environmental system and distribution system facilities. aquatic habitat. The initiative was undertaken to reduce Achievement Awards, the District's current 14+MGD effluent Public Information &Education continuer] from Page 3 discharge to the San Joaquin River,an Awards Honor Seven Agencies imparted water body in Northern AMSA's Public Ltfonnation & Rep.Saxton has championed envimn- California. Education Awards are presented for out- mental issues throughout his eight terms standing programs in these categories: as United States Representative for New Operations Award Honors Columbus, Video,Printed Publication and Jersey's 3rd District.Saxton is noted for Go,and Tacoma, Wash. Educational Program. his cost-effective solutions while main- Columbus Water Works,Ga.,has been taining policy balance with state and selected by AMSA's Awards Committee Three agencies are being honored for federal regulatory programs. to receive a 2001 Operations Award.The their exceptional video projects. South Columbus Water Resources Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Since 1989 Billy G.Turner has served Facility is a publicly owned wastewater Ohio,will be honored for their dynamic as President of the Columbus Water treatment facility that was fully auto- video, Uncovering Cleveland's Sewer Works, which serves more than 60,000 mated in July 2000,which resulted in System.Narrated by an animated water customers. Under Turner's leadership, reduced costs,increased efficiency and droplet,this informative video walks the major community improvements have becoming more competitive in the waste- viewer through the water cycle and niter- been accomplished including an water treatment industry. ations of a water and wastewater utility. eleven mile Riverwalk, several park areas and a nationally recognized City of Tacoma,Wash.,has been Good Neighbors—The New Face of advanced demonstration of wet selected to receive an Operations Award Wastewater Treatment is also being weather treatment technology. for their"Wastewater Conservation honored in this category.Produced by Loan Program."This project staned in Water Services of Clackamas County, Thirteen Awards Honor Member 1998 and provides low interest loans to Ore.,the video demonstrates that new Agency Contributions qualified residential and commercial technology and design coupled with AMSA's Awards Committee reviewed property owners for private sewer repair increased sensitivities to neighbor's 35 worthy nominations for this year's or replacement. Since its inception 18 needs are resulting in a"new breed"of agency awards.A total of thirteen agen- months ago,the program has granted wastewater treatment facilities that are ties will be honored for their contribu- over 50 loans. more neighborhood friendly. tions to the field of wastewater treatment in the areas of Research&Technology, Phoenix, Northeast Ohio Honored for Little Blue Valley Sewer District,Mo..is Operations,Public Service and Public Excellent Public Service being honored for then video entitled Information&Education. The City of Phoenix,Ariz.,is being The Path of Least Resistance.The video honored with a Public Service Award describes wastewater conveyance and Research& lechrwlogy Recognizes for their`Tres Rios Constructed treatment for the general public and Two Innovative Projects Wetland Demonstration Project:'Faced focuses on sanitary sewer overflows, The Metropolitan Water Reclamation with$635 million of upgrades for their backups,the impact on the public health District of Greater Chicago,Ill.,was Slat Avenue Wastewater Treatment and the environment. selected for the 2001 Research& Plant to meet water quality standards, Technology Award for its"Biosolids as the City began exploring cost-effective Hampton Roads Sanitation District,Va., a Topsoil Substitute for the Germination solutions to meet their needs.The Tres is being honored in the printed publica- and Growth of Turf,Forage,Prairie Rios project resulted in the development tion category for their 60th Anniversary Grasses and Wild Flower Plants"project. of a full-scale sustainable treatment sys- Commemorative Calendar.The calendar The principal objective of this program tem that can meet their objectives in a was to developed to foster recognition was to compare the germination and cost-effective manner. for the District's contribution to improv- growth rates to determine which species ing water quality over the past six are well-suited for growth in biosolids. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, decades and to build and maintain As a result,the District's biosolids have Ohio,will also receive a 2001 Public awareness and support from key state been successfully used as a topsoil sub- Service Award for their"Chevrolet and local elected officials. stitute for a variety of projects. 0 •continued on page 5 City of Tacoma,Wash.,is being honored Day"program.This project is dedicated A for their innovative educational program, to promoting and preserving the tradition N�A(TI jO"NALit the EnWwChallenger.The Envim- of Virginia fanning. ERmroRPal Challenger is a modified,colorfully Ulf 0jpainted van that carries hands-on,inter- Lastly,AMSA will honor Central RDS active lessons to elementary school Contra Costa Sanitary District,Calif_ classrooms to teach children how their for their educational program—Our - -- -- daily activities affect the environment Water, Our Word Pesticide Reduction and how changing their behavior could Program.This program is a broad-based and prumom Integrated Pcsi improve water quality. public education campaign that pro- Management through eye-catching, motes less toxic pest control to protect point-of-sale displays and fact sheets. Also,being awarded for educational water quality.The District is working programs is Hampton Roads Sanitation with 13 local hardware stores and gar- AMSA looks forward to honoring these District,Va., for their"Celebrate Farming den centers to stock less-toxic products individuals and organizations in May.■ "Extinction, after all, is irreversible. As the ESA comes closer to urban These include EPA approval of state If a species becomes extinct, we are left areas,the species encountered are likely water quality standards and National to speculate forever on what we might to be some never thought of or known Pollutant Discharge Elimination System have learned or what we may have real- about before.They could include a sub- (NPDES)permitting programs.The ized.If we conserve the species, it will species of beach mouse,an invertebrate AMSA-supported MOA marks these be available for the study and benefit of insect,an aquatic plant, or a small song- agencies' improved implementation of future generations." bird that may appear nothing but ordi- the ESA's Section 7 consultation nary to the passing observer.These are requirement.This provision requires Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, that all federal agencies ensure that their 4F6 (4th Cir. 2000); cart. denied actions are"not likely to jeopardize the Gibbs v. Norton, 121 S.Ct. 1081 continued existence of any endangered (Feb. 20, 2001) species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification" of the species'critical habitat. Aparticularly challenging visitor The ESA already has made lasting may arrive in your town soon— just some of the endangered species that impact on some AMSA members,like the Endangered Species Act recently have thrown a wrench in the those in the Pacific-Northwest where (ESA)of 1973.If history is any guide, permitting or development wheel for salmonid listings have permanently its arrival will not go unnoticed. In the various interests in documented legal affected regional CWA implementation. U.S. today there are 971 total endan- cases. Even though the Supreme Court Other publicly owned treatment works gered and 273 threatened species and held this January in the Solid Waste (POTWs)in California have been chill- plants—70 and 44 of which respectively Agency of Northern Cook County Clean ing their effluent for years so it is dis- are fish—making it possible that a listed Water Act(CWA)case that"Ir]egula- charged at the proper temperature for species may one day be found in your tion of land use(is] a function tradition- endangered steelhead salmon in the receiving water.The ESA's role as a ally performed by local governments", receiving water.A few AMSA members powerful environmental decision mak- the discovery of an endangered species have had early indications that reduc- ing tool became clear in the famed 1978 changes the roles and brings the federal lions in stormwater sediment may be Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA)case government's interests prominently to required to avoid impacts on endangered involving the snail darer and the Tellico the table.Working through ESA fish.The scientific uncertainties accom- Dam. Despite the geographic diversity requirements,such as the development parrying the determination of what steps of listed species,the ESA still is per- of Section 10 Habitat Conservation are needed to protect certain species ceived as a law that only impacts the Plans,are certain to lead to constmc- only complicates ESA questions. timber, fishing and farming interests, lion,expansion,or permitting delays— and often in remote,still largely wild, and present public relations challenges We will not hear a fresh Supreme Court and often federal lands. Continued sub- to those whose activities conflict with view of the proper role of the ESA any urban expansion and the resulting pres- the species, time soon. On February 20,2001,the sures brought on our land, water Supreme Court declined to heat the most and other natural resources,however,is In January 2001, EPA and the Fish and recent ESA case presented to it,Gibbs v. making it more likely that endangered Wildlife and National Marine Fisheries Norton,involving the reintroduction of species will meet up—and conflict with Services completed a Memorandum of red wolves in North Carolina. Gibbs —essential urban activities such as Agreement(MOA)to memorialize how questioned the very constitutionality of wastewater treatment. these agencies will more effectively the now nearly three decades old statute. consider the endangered species impacts of federal Clean Water Act decisions. ♦continued on pope 6 Borba review 'real problem' Page 1 of JjELL�V� l`t'EhT' tTS A MA`S 0/= TIM"; 8� Anderson, Blake /W-�- of Co-rNo �ht2cE5 r�'tovE ro rttE i�^�Rdt ..n,�y andYBs So 641 T- t T- We'J' - GE >`Asy From: Michael Tumipseed [m.tumipseed@prodigy.net] Sent: Saturday, May 05,2001 5:25 PM To: Tom Woodruff; Tom Nixon; Ray Miller; Ray Kearney; Mike Sullivan; Mike Moore; Layne Baroldi; Judy Wilson;Jim Stahl; Jeremy Neill; Bob Horvath; Blake Anderson Subject: Borba review'real problem' 0loeal iLlte,ita(vtslirlbt<aliWmimr hcxne r Comment an en Borba review 'real problem' Filed: 0510512001 By CHRISTINE BEDELL, Californian staff writer e-mail: cbedell@bakemfield.com Experts are questioning the practicality and fairness of a judge's order that George and James Borba - if they want to build their dairies -- must study how millions of cows in eight counties foul the environment. Accurate information on the cumulative impact of all dairies in the San Joaquin Valley air basin simply does not exist, regulators, planners and attorneys said Friday, a day after the ruling. And undertaking such a study is a monumental task, they said, especially for two cousins and their advisers. "No doubt about it, this is a real problem," said Deputy County Counsel James Thebeau, who is working with the Borbas on the case. Attorneys opposing the Borbas and county in court don't think the order's too tall. The cousins can glean good information from studies that Kings, Tulare and other counties have completed on dairies and apply it to their own, said Caroline Farrell of the Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment. "This is a realistic step that will give people some context as to how the project will affect the environment," Farrell said. 05/08/2001 Borba review'real problem' Page 2 of 3 Kern County Superior Court Judge Roger Randall requested that and other environmental reports in a ruling that essentially blocks the Borbas from building their twin 14,200-cow dairies at Taft Highway and Buena Vista Road. Technically, the Borbas can build until a judge requires Kem County to issue a stop-work order against the projects, Planning Director Ted James said Friday after consulting with county attorneys. James Borba has grading and building permits for his dairy; George Borba has grading permits, James said. And it's still possible the Borbas would fight such an order, said their attorney, Michael Remy. Remy agreed with the experts'take on Randall's call for a regional study. 'We're gonna try like heck to satisfy the judge," he said. 'We'll still have to see if we can." The problem is that there are an enormous number of dairies in the eight-county area -- reports from 1999 to today show about 1,460 -- and many are operated differently, said Kings County Planning Director Bill Zumwalt. So Farrell's tactic would not do a whole lot of good, he said: "You can make rough generalities but why would you go to such expense for rough generalities?' State and valley air boards can't regulate dairies and so have not analyzed their emissions, he also said. 'This would be a monumental task,'Zumwalt said of Randall's charge. To make matters worse, about 60 percent of Central Valley dairies were approved "by right"--without extensive environmental review and public comment — so little is known about them, Remy said. The judge's order is not just difficult, it's "fundamentally unfair"to the Borbas, Thebeau argued. More information could be available soon, said Robert Feenstra, executive director of the Milk Producers Council. Dairymen and scientists are conducting an unprecedented amount of environmental research, he said. In his written decision, Randall outlined tasks the Barba consultants could have done but didn't do in preparing the Borba environmental impact report. 05/08/2001 Borba review 'real problem' Page 3 of 3 A lot of information about Kern County's dairies is available, he wrote. Randall said that during oral arguments, officials "were unable to explain" why they did not "go to traditional sources of farm information" such as the University of California farm adviser's offices in Kern and surrounding counties. "The judge recognized that they could have taken reasonable steps and did not," ot" Farrell said. That's all that state environmental law requires, she said. Ralph Phillips, University of California Cooperative Extension farm adviser in Bakersfield, agreed there's a dearth of information about dairies' air impacts. He and his colleagues on the county Dairy Technical Advisory Committee didn't find much as they researched dairy issues for the Board of Supervisors over the last year, he said. It would be difficult, Phillips also said, for someone to test for emissions like ammonia at a dairy and know what's coming from the farm and what's coming from other sources. Lack of funds accounts for the lack of science, he said. "There just hasn't been the money for it," Philipps said. "Research isn't cheap." ru mme¢on 0 v mis kkJJ back to Wp home Copyrigh[02gg1,the aakeageld Calil mian I Email the Webmaster y�led all Privacy Policy 5laiemanl I Terms of Use - p0 a21% 05/08/2001 Judge halts Borba dairies Pagel of 3 Anderson, Blake From: Michael Turnipseed [m.tumipseed@prodigy.net] Sent: Saturday, May 05,2001 5:24 PM To: Tom Woodruff Tom Nixon; Ray Miller; Ray Kearney; Mike Sullivan; Mike Moore; Layne Baroldt; Judy Wilson;Jim Stahl;Jeremy Neill; Bob Horvath; Blake Anderson Subject: Judge halts Borba dairies Save on all your favorite stuff t local Ole Vahrrsfirlb Enlifominn Shane 1 Comment an a0 C� [his Ro Judge halts Borba dairies Filed: 0510412001 By CHRISTINE BEDELL Californian staff writer e-mail: cbedell@bakersfield.com Project on hold pending more environmental review A judge blocked construction of the Borba dairies in favor of more environmental review Thursday, reopening a planning dispute that embroiled southwest Bakersfield for more than a year. The judge also requested more scientific data on the impacts of all dairies — existing and approved — in the eight-county San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. Cousins James and George Boll will comply with Kern County Superior Court Judge Roger Randall's order and tell him what he wants to know within 30 days, George Borba said. "It's not that big of a deal," he said. "The judge has asked for more information, and we're going to give it to him." But that won't be the end of it. The county Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors will have to review whatever new scientific information the Borbas produce and re-vote on the dairies. And in the lawsuit--filed by the Center for Race, Politics and the Environment—defense attorneys said there's little available data 05/08/2001 Judge halts Borba dairies Page 2 of 3 on the total impacts of dairies in the region. Locally, Borba dairy opponents foresee a whole new fight— and feel better armed for it. "Justice has prevailed," said southwest Bakersfield resident Mary Berglund. "The Borbas haven't been the good neighbors they promised to be and I'm glad to see they will have an opportunity to do better." The project, approved by the Board of Supervisors in July 2000, eventually would put more than 28,000 cows on two dairies at Taft Highway and Buena Vista Road southwest of Bakersfield. The Borbas have graded the site but have not begun to build. They still are operating their Chino dairies and have no target construction date here. The cousins first proposed the dairies in early 1998, and to settle another lawsuit from the center agreed to prepare an environmental impact report later that year. It was the first dairy EIR undertaken in Califomia. Community opposition began to swell in late 1999 and largely centered on the dairies' potential air and water impacts and smells. A month after the supervisors'4-1 vote to approve the project— with Ken Peterson dissenting —the center filed its second suit. The Sierra Club later became a co-plaintiff. Bakersfield residents tried to set aside the supervisors' decision by placing a Borba referendum on a countywide ballot. But they failed to gather enough signatures to put the matter on the ballot. Of Randall's ruling Thursday, center attorney Caroline Farrell said: "The judge ruled against us on one minor point but the rest is all good." Michael Marsh, chief executive officer of the lobbying group Western United Dairymen, said he hoped for Kem County's sake the ruling won't deter other dairy operators from trying to locate in Kem. He took strong aim at the center,whose finances he recently asked California congressmen, including Kem County's, to investigate. Western United Dairymen has accused the group of improperly using money for the poor to cripple businesses, something the center denies. The center"has been very successful at putting people out of work in the Central Valley and, unfortunately, this seems to be another 05/08/2001 Judge halts Borba dairies Page 3 of 3 in their hat," Marsh said. Randall, meanwhile, asked the Borbas to analyze the: * Cumulative impacts of Kern County's 34 existing dairies; three additional recently approved Kern dairies; and the existing and approved -- but not yet built — dairies in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. * "Feasible" alternatives to the Borba dairies, including a smaller version. * Health impacts of dairy-generated particulate matter, or dust, and how much the Borba project would kick up. * Practicality and efficacy of an aerobic treatment system for waste. * Cost of cleaning up project groundwater contamination. * Volume of leakage anticipated from the dairy lagoons "in a fashion comprehensible to members of the public and the board" Kern County Counsel Bernard Barmann declared the Borba project "effectively reopened." There is an upside to Randall's order, he said —the Borbas now know the extent to which they should study their dairies. The ruling did not surprise him, Barmann said. "It's not unusual for this kind of cleanup to be required (of environmental documents)," he said. CCammeman W.),to wp home cop",112001,The aakersfeld Califomen I Email lbe Webmasler p�reE By Pnvacv Polwv Slatemenl Teems—o�se .e.Plod i B 05/08/2001 FrSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority SAWPA Safe Reliable Water...To Protect and Provide March, 2001 SAWPA—Bringing Diverse Interests Together Try to envision a 2,650 collectively to draught- five member agencies, the southwestern San square-mile semiarid proof the watershed in the Eastern Municipal Water Bernardino Counties. See jackrabbit haven, where face of numerous District, Inland Empire map at left..... local water supplies challenges. Utilities Agency, Orange SAWPA's consisted of a few days of SAWPA understanding of the torrential downpour, was formed in r,\i'^ Watershed and ability to followed by ten months of 1972 to >�:Yy .y,,`. S/'^"" collaborate with regional like theesert famine. Sounds perfect setting for maintain and A r .y(� .� coanstruct a host of ers has been sed to YJ�eiFe. " a disturbing episode of regional plans, J successful projects. The Mutual of Omaha's Wild programs and Santa Ana River Kingdom, but it's sobering projects that Interceptor, or SARI line, to consider what Southern will protect the transports salty water California's coastal and Santa Ana �1. \ more than 100 miles from inland regions would be River Basin \. �\} the Inland regions to like without their history of water proper disposal in the cooperation among resources to ocean. The joint powers diverse water interests. maximize authority has also built Santa Ana Watershed beneficial uses within the County Water District, San two operating desalters, Project Authority(SAWPA) watershed in an Bernardino Valley numerous pipelines and has become a conduit for economically and Municipal Water District, water treatment facilities bringing all of the environmentally and Western Municipal to improve the area's watershed's stakeholders responsible manner." Water District. Its total water quality. But for regional solutions to Since then,the area, 2,650 square miles In SAWPA's largest success their common water organization has provided all, brings in much of to date has been securing management needs. a unified voice for the Orange County, a sliver of more than $250 million Under SAWPA's water management needs Los Angeles County, and dollars in state money leadership, local leaders of the Basin's more than the major population from the most recent have stepped up to the five million people. centers of western statewide water bond, public works plate, striving SAWPA is composed of Riverside and Proposition 13. Safe, Reliable Water...Who could ask for anything more? Inside this issue: Birds, bees, flowers, trees and the environment. The IWP, which &SM Nngw wew z people all have one need in common-we received $250 million in funding from waMr.a wcambs all depend on a clean and reliable water Proposition 13 in the Southern avanary'PP° supply. With the help of its California Integrated NWMd1Mr z member agencies, SAWPA Watershed Program, has taken great strides contains scores of projects fnOmnmenMUnredam z toward drought-proofing planned regionally by the entire Santa Ana River SAWPA, but implemented Caaonuea funomg ON 3 Watershed. The Santa Ana by local agencies. The a me wamrsnee's furore Integrated Watershed Program (IWP) projects contained in the IWP consist of N.I.noes"ter 3 promises to sustain industry and six major program categories: ware from, families with only positive effects on (wnfinue0 oo~d) No Such Thing as "New Water" Orange County's Visionary Approach to Recycling Mother Nature has been wastewater using high-tech aquifers. The water will greatly recycling water since the beginning membrane technologies including improve the quality of the existing of time. Whether we are talking reverse osmosis, microfiltration and groundwater by reducing mineral about snow melting into lakes and ultraviolet disinfection. These are levels before it is pumped out for streams or rainfall and use throughout the county. Imported water percolating ���� This process will reduce Into South Coast groundwater Orange County's dependence on basins, all water has had a imported water sources, especially previous life. during times of drought. It will also The Orange County Water eliminate the need to construct a District and the Orange new$170 million ocean outlet to County Sanitation District handle increased wastewater have developed a system that discharges and It will enhance the blends the cutting edge of environment by reducing these water treatment technology discharges Into the ocean. with natural purification A decision by the two district's processes. This Groundwater boards of directors to move Replenishment(GWR)System is a the same technologies used by forward with the project is multi-step water recycling and bottled water, pharmaceutical and expected early this year. The GWR purification process that will create food manufacturing industries. The System has broad-based support 70,000 acre-feet of near-distilled water will then be pumped into in Orange County and throughout quality water each year. The GWR spreading basins where it will the Watershed, and it is truly a System will purify highly treated naturally filter into the region's vast "win-win"for all stakeholders. Nature's Purifier Many Californians are under helps to recover the endangered the Illusion that the water needs of LEAST BELLS VIREO. people and those of wildlife are Southern California's century of never compatible, but we have development has tended to short discovered that this is untrue. The change waterfowl by building over Orange County Water District has scarce wetlands or diverting the operated an artificial wetland for water that would normally sustain almost a decade in the Chino area, them. SAWPA believes that and the SAWPA member agency through continued development of has realized estimated water natural and artificial wetlands along treatment cost savings of more the course of the Santa Ana,this than $10 million annually. The negative trend can be reversed. In system works by taking nitrate-rich total, the IWP calls for the creation water from the river and easing it of up to 10,000 acres of wetlands through man made wetlands. In and open space, 5,000 of which is the swampy environment, nitrates located in Prado Basin. These are absorbed and used by the wetlands will facilitate the abundant plant life. Not only does percolation of runoff and river this practice help purify tainted water into the water table. A water-accomplishing the same number of projects similar to goal as treatment plants-it opens OCWD's have been approved by � significant Southern California SAWPA to receive funding, and �' ". . acreage to migrating birds and two are now in the works. P,.2 Santa Aga Watennea Continued Funding Environmental Invaders The plants, roots and inundated with a pesky invasive Will be Vital to the microorganisms in the artificial species of non-native cane called Watershed's Future wetlands will increase the Arundo Donax. The huge tremendous benefit in removing bamboo-like grass can reach It is no longer reasonable to nitrates in local water supplies, heights of 40 feet, and collectively believe Southern California can but another plant is a real it guzzles as much as 37,000 indefinitely increase water resource problem. Much of the Santa Ana acre-feet of water every year- imports from other parts of the River and its tributaries are enough to meet the annual water state and nation. The Santa Ana needs of 74,000 families. Watershed's unique mixture of "ifs; il, Reducing the cane urban and rural areas will require presence in the watershed significant and ongoing effort if we and replacing It with native are to meet our complex needs habitat is a high priority for relating to growth, water quality SAWPA and the regional and the environment. But the partners. Up to S30 million steps being taken in the IWP by has been allocated from the local water agencies may SCIWP program in the permanently alter the way water bond to rein in these Southern California is viewed by environmental invaders. the state's water community at large. SAWPA's plan for the region's future has already realized Answer: The Faucet . . much of its tremendous potential thanks to the recent infusion of Question: Where Does Water Come From? statewide bond money, but more resources are certain to be needed For consumers, what demands and Its Incorporation if we are to sustain our progress. happens before water comes out into the District's overall water There are opportunities of the faucet is a mystery. One of supply plan will free up additional nationally to receive funding from the key elements in the water Colorado Aqueduct supplies. the federal government for projects delivery process that is often These Innovative projects are that are already underway, as well overlooked is the system of creating great alternative uses for as ones that have not yet been pipelines that transfers water recycled water and increasing the initiated.This is currently being from its point of origin to its point area's overall supply. Both pursued on a regional basis of residential or industrial use. projects have received the through the CalFed effort. Two such pipelines in the necessary environmental SAWPA also anticipates future IWP are almost ready to break approvals and will soon be opportunities to take advantage of ground. The Yucaipa Valley among the first to receive statewide bond measures similar Water District pipeline is part of a Proposition 13 funding. to Proposition 13, and discussions program to utilize recycled water Congratulations to Yucaipa and are beginning in for wetlands and habitat in order Western on a job well done! Sacramento to offset the need for for a bond that imported water. The .'Aeijlly�r x focuses on Western Municipal improving Water District pipeline water quality. will convey non- potable water from a groundwater basin for -' irrigation uses in _ ]� Western's service area ..i r and provide for basin cleanup with storm runoff. Western's m non-potable water .. Santa Ana Watarahed Pe9.3 u _ SAWPA Santa Ana Watershed MR. BLAKE ANDERSON Project AuthorityORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT J 10844 ELLIS AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-7018 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, California 92503 (909) 785-5411 Safe Reliable Water... To Protect and Provide Visit us on the web NEXT EDITION: r Nature's Underground Goldmine... The Chino Basin Safe, Reliable Water .. from page 1 Groundwater Cleanup and Purification will Water Recycling is the product of a major attitude mitigate negative groundwater impacts shift in water use, and the IWP encourages from nearly a century of agricultural and recycling and reuse as a means to reduce other industrial land use practices our area's overall consumption; and primarily through the construction of <pa increase our ability to squeeze every drop (a desalting facilities; from local water; Water Storage will enable the Watershed to Recreation and Conservation will bring much- withstand a major statewide drought by needed connected recreational opportunities storing upwards of 1,000,000 acre-feet of to the region, providing access to the river new water underground throughout the M4,61 open spaces and increasing public basin; awareness of the Santa Ana's environmental 0 opportunities, needs and importance. Flood Protection will keep lives and property safe and keeps contaminants The ambitions of SAWPA's IWP are unprecedented out of the Santa Ana River; in Southern California history, but this$3 billion, 20-year plan with over 200 integrated projects will Wetlands, Habitat and the Environment will all be accomplish much of its drought-proofing work enhanced as 10,000 acres of man-made and natural within the next five to ten years. The$250 million wetlands are constructed and improved, from the state water bond (Prop 13) has been actions that will improve water quality and instrumental in getting these projects off the ground, help restore the West's now-hindered but there will be an ongoing effort to gain matching Pacific Flyway for native migratory birds; funding from the federal government. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held one , 20jg_l, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on_ZjaP,_ L7 _ , 20�/. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of Penny M.Kyle, Secret Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 1\RADON\DATAI\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC Y ' AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 2001 —7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. City/Acencv Active Director Alternate Director Irvine Beth Krom Greg Smith Irvine Ranch Water District Brian Brady Darryl G. Miller 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 05/23/01 Page 2' 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting). 8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the joint regular meeting with Orange County Water District on March 28, 2001, and the minutes for the regular meeting held on April 25, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 04/15101 04/30/01 Totals $4,902,067.85 $5,456,619.31 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, City of Los Alamitos, a charter city v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CCO2192, in connection with eminent domain of the public road project commonly known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement Project" in the City of Los Alamitos; and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 05/23/01 Page 3 'J 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 23, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 25, 2001 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re May 2, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 2001 to be filed. C. Approve a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Karen Monaco and Associates to provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial Information System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one year period effective July 1, 2001, with option to renew for one year. d. Approve the Purchase of an IBM AS400 Model 820 (Specification No. E-2001-4413D) in support of the District's Financial Information System, for an amount not to exceed $400,000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance and applicable taxes. The purchase to be made by soliciting sealed bids from authorized IBM dealers. e. (1) Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with SeaVisual Consulting, Inc.for services to analyze, interpret and report current meter data, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $129,884, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods; and (2) authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.for services to evaluate the effects to the coastal marine environment of the discharge of treated wastewater effluent, for an additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods. f. (1)Authorize the General Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000 from the FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary design and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and (2) approve in concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for FY 2001- 2002. 05/23/01 Page B t g. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES Power Plant portion of studies,for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85,for a total project budget of$2,925,000; (2) authorize staff to seek reimbursement from AES Power Plant for$350,000; (3) authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts, including those in excess of$100,000, with government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those contracts; and (4) pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies relating to said project would be made available by the District. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re May 17, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 17, 2001 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 05/23401 Board Meeting.) C. Approve a Sole Source Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for development of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2 for a total amount not to exceed $308,000. d. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo& Moore, and Converse Consultants to provide for materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-3313D, for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for each consultant for July 2001/2002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($300,000 total). e. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush 6 Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD,for an amount not to exceed $120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000 total). f. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD,for an amount not to exceed $70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($350,000 total). 05/23/01 Page 5 g. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$8,810,056.56; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of$90,780, increasing the total contract amount to $8,900,836.56; and (3)Accept Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. h. Ratify Change Order No.1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of$2,692 and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $943,308. I. Establish a budget of$144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection Project, Contract No. 11-14R. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the May 9, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 9, 2001 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2001. d. Receive,file and approve the Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2001. e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2001. f. Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2001 to May 15, 2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $75,724. g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-10, Directing the County Tax Collection- Treasurer to include Sanitary Sewer Charges on the 2001-02 Property Tax Bills. 16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re May 14, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 9, 2001, to be filed. O5/23/O1 Page 6 } 17. 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, 2) award a contract to Pioneer Americas, Inc. for the Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution No. C-150, for the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002,with four one year renewal options, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $969.117. 18. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-15, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSDA 1, and OCSD-13 (as recommended by the FAHR Committee): a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 11, 2001. b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-15 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and pass to second reading and public hearing on June 27, 2001. 19. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000002012 (Government Code Section 54956.9) 2. Confer with General Counsel—Anticipated Litigation—Government Code Section 54956.9(c), one potential case. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered In closed session 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 05/23/01 Page 7 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 23, 2001 —7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the i meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: a. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, the Mortelette Family Trust v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CC01525, for alleged property damage in connection with Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1; and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the Interests of the District. Wead\datal\wpAtMagenda\Board Agendas\2001 Board Agendas\052301supplemenlal.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date To Bd.of Dir. s/23/DI AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item (a)Rr ]1 um Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Mike White, Risk Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS RE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, THE MORTELETTE FAMILY TRUST V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, ET AL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, the Mortelette Family Trust v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01CC01525, for alleged property damage in connection with Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1; and 2) authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo from General Counsel. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel. /pk weadld.Wl p dl.0101eddrd Age.da R.11l .'eras Ad<odd Rep]de'O`AI\ham 21(a1.d. RBbsed.W30*8 Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: May 17, 2001 RE: The Mortelette Family Trust, Robert Tighe v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., OCSD No. 01CCO1525 On May 17, 2001, the District was served with a summons and complaint by the above-referenced Plaintiffs, arising out of the Construction Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract 2-41-1. Plaintiffs, whose residence is located in the direct location of the construction activities, allege damage to person and property. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement with Advanco Constructors, the District is entitled to and will require Advanco to secure counsel and represent the interests of the District. However, it is recommended that this matter be referred to the General Counsel to appear and defend, in the event Advanco fails or refuses to do so. THOMAS L.WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pI cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Mr. D.A. Ludwin Mr. J. Linder Mr. M. White Ms. P. Kyle MORTELETTE t i Orange County Sanitation District Orange County Water District MINUTES Joint BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2001 �OJN� SAN►Tgl�oy z o � �r Fcr�N TG HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Joint Minutes for Board Meeting v Page 2 03/28/01 ROLL CALL A joint meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District and the Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District was held on March 28, 2001, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonton X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashime Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Mike Ward X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Peer Swan Darryl Miller X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Sonja Wassgren; Jean Tappan; Jim Herberg;Wendy Sevenandt; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hagan; General Counsel; Don Hughes; Jerry King; Iry Pickier;Jan Flory;West Bannister; Kathryn Barr, Denis Bilodeau; Lawrence P. Kraemer, Jr.; Philip L. Anthony; Jan Debay; Brett Franklin; Clarke Ide, General Counsel; Bill Mills, General Manager; Janice Durant; Andrew Czomy; John Kennedy; Tom Knoell;Tom Dawes; Andrea Haas; Martha West; John Bonsangue;Tim Sovich; Laura Cernog; Ryan Irish; Dan &Tiffany Buter; Judy Wootton; Stan Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 03/28/01 r Wooton; Jeremy Davis; Bruce Dosier; Carl &Donna Nelson; Mike Samples; Judy-Rae Karlsen; Mike Wehner; Nira Yamachista; Stephanie Strohman; Patrick A. Lewis; Rita Hirrthian;J.L. Davis; Shivaj Deshmurk; Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Michelle Tuchman; Bill Tappan; Alberta Christy; Debra Bums; Kelly Bum-Roy; Dick Cornell; Ron Wildermuth; Joan Irvine Smith; Mary K. Antonelli; Irwin Haydock; Joseph Racano; Larry Porter; Fred Bockmiller; Jim Atkinson; Lou Baker; Ronald C. Schlenker, Justin McCusker; Marge England; Judith Gielow; Reed L. Royalty; Patrick Scanlon; Jim Sullivan; Bruce Chalmers; Dennis Kasper; Ronald Schlenker; Jim Ross; Richard Bell; Terry Lane; Bill Everest; John T. Morris; Paul R. Brown; Kevin Alexander; Dick Sudak; Ken Stedman; Tricia Jakubiak; Ed LaBahn; Dan Walker; Steve Ro; Dr. James Gales; James Peterson; Keith Lyon; Sister Sharon Fritsch; Sister Madguita Domingo; Edgar Fandialan; Don Herz; Steve Tedesco; Michael Boess; John Carlson; Diana Leach; Don Calkins; Mike Wellborn; Fred Broush; Ted Poponchah; Ian Skidmore; Linda Feffer; Mike Payne; Ted Butteriss; Bob Kellison; Dave Houston; Robert M. Bell, Jr. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Norm Eckenrode, Chair, welcomed those attending the joint meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)and Orange County Water District(OCWD) regarding the groundwater replenishment project(GWR). He stated that this project would be the single best project for Orange County residents and businesses. Mr. Eckenrode announced the Anaheim City Council unanimously endorsed the groundwater replenishment project and supported the formation of a Groundwater Producers Advisory Group. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the following correspondence: • Orange County Groundwater Producers letter dated March 25, 2001 • Orange Coast Watch letter dated March 22. 2001 • Mesa Consolidated Water District letter dated March 23, 2001 • Irvine Ranch Water District letter dated March 27, 2001 • Alicia K. DeFrezna letter dated March 27, 2001 • Phillip J. Stevens letter dated March 26, 2001 • National Water Research Institute letter dated March 27, 2001 • Orange County Business Council letter dated March 28, 2001 Chair Eckenrode reported that an additional condition in connection with Agenda Item No. 1 was added as Agenda Item No. 1(f)to establish a groundwater producers advisory group and implement to the degree possible the eleven points in the groundwater producers letter dated March 25, 2001. Jerry King, President of the Orange County Water District Board of Directors, then gave a brief verbal report to his Board of Directors Iry Pickier, Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee was recognized who reported on the future needs of water within Orange County. He stated that grants in excess of$57 million have been obtained,with additional grant requests pending. The remainder of the costs will be split between OCWD and OCSD. He applauded Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for its many efforts to provide future water reliability for Southern California in the face of cutbacks in the Colorado River and threats to water from Northern California. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 03/28/01 William R. Mills, General Manager of Orange County Water District, reported that the GWR project is a safe, economical, and environmentally responsible solution to Orange County's future water needs and will be a major part to ensure that something similar to the energy crisis does not happen to our water supply. Blake P. Anderson, General Manager of Orange County Sanitation District, gave a brief report on the GWR project and addressed cost issues and water quality issues. He stated it would take half as much power to reclaim the water than it takes to import water. Reclamation of water has been going on within the state for over 30 years. This project provides additional technologies such as microfittration and reverse osmosis. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mary K. Antonelli of Huntington Beach stated that the water reclamation project is a good idea but feels that full secondary treatment should be addressed before going forward with the groundwater replenishment project. Irwin Haydock of Fountain Valley stated he was in favor of the water reclamation project. However, he asked the Directors for a promise to provide a web-based tool to allow the public to participate in the project, planning, modeling, implementation and monitoring, in order to forecast future environmental, economic and societal implications of what your actions accomplished tonight. Jan Vanderslood of Newport Beach spoke against the groundwater replenishment project until all wastewater is subjected to full secondary treatment prior to being sent to the ocean outfall. He was also concerned with increased pollution to the ocean and limits being exceeded beyond what the Clean Water Act has approved. Eileen Murphy of Huntington Beach urged the Directors to go to full secondary treatment of its effluent that will be put into the ocean. Joseph Racano of Huntington Beach warned Directors that to approve this project would be the subject of scorn and ridicule for generations. The project would increase the impurities put through the ocean outfall with less water causing increased bacteria and damage to the ocean. He stated that reverse osmosis was not foolproof and there would be an increased probability of injecting viruses into our drinking water. He was also concerned that by the time mistakes are discovered, remedies will be costly and late in coming. He feels the entire project is a thinly veiled scheme to stop salt-water intrusion so the building industry, which owns our politicians and our politics, can continue on their merry over-building way. Larry Porter of Newport Beach asked Directors if the groundwater replenishment system project was the final solution. Fred Bockmiller of Costa Mesa spoke in favor of the groundwater replenishment system project. He expressed concern about costs and feels the groundwater producers have made a set of recommendations that are sound and will help keep costs in control. He challenged Orange County Sanitation District to look at issue of cost sharing. Currently OCSD is committed to 50% of the capital construction costs, and they are not committing in any way to operational and maintenance costs of the project. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 03/28/01 Jim Atkinson of Mesa Consolidated Water District addressed the Directors and expressed support for the groundwater replenishment project and the inclusion of Item 1(f). He would also like to Include a member from each of the boards to participate in the advisory group. Lou Baker of Huntington Beach addressed the Directors who spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment system. However, he feels more study needs to be done prior to $34 million being spent in contracts and also urged the district to discharge cleaner water through the outfall. Ronald C. Schlenker of the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment project. Justin McCusker, representing the Orange County Business Council, spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment project. A letter was submitted to the Board in support of the project that evening. Judith Gielu, representing the Orange County League of Women Voters, spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment project. Reed Royalty, representing the Orange County Taxpayers Association, spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment project. Patrick Scanlon of the Groundwater Producers Council spoke in support of the groundwater replenishment project. Joan Irvine Smith spoke to the Directors in support of the groundwater replenishment project. She also stated that it was imperative that the freshwater and marine environments be protected. She requested that the Orange County Sanitation District look into alternative methods of the sewage outfall and problems associated with it. Director Peter Green then requested staff to comment on statements made that evening on public Information programs and the ability to access information via the website on a continuing basis. Mr. Mills of the Orange County Water District stated there was a website, gwrsystem.com, where current information would be available. Blake Anderson, General Manager of Orange County Sanitation District, responded that access to information by the public is also available on the district's website, ocsd.com. He stated that the 301(h)waiver is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The permit has extensive requirements the District must consistently achieve. Issues related to the level of treatment and the impact on the environment is of supreme Importance to OCSD. He assured the public that the District's marine monitoring program assures that the District is effectively protecting the environment and public health. This summer the District will be spending an additional $2 million on extensive studies to test the hypothesis that was suggested by Dr. Stanley Grant of LICI, that suggests under certain oceanographic conditions there is a possibility that the edge of the District's plume is pulled into shore. If these studies suggest that a higher level of treatment is required, Mr. Anderson assured this Information would be released immediately to the public by the Orange County Sanitation District. RECESS: The Chair announced a 10-minute recess. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting V Page 6 03/28/01 RECONVENE: The meeting reconvened at 8:14 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS Irwin Haydock of Fountain Valley addressed the Directors about Director Peter Green's question and the webslte available through the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District, as well as a website for the National Water Research Institute. His request and concern was not what he was requesting. He was requesting a system that would allow everyone to determine what is happening, how it is going and how It affects all the other things. He also requested that information be timely and more current than what is currently provided. 1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM Bill Mills, General Manager of OCWD, explaining items 1(a)through (0, gave a brief staff report. A motion was made and seconded to amend Item 1(0 to remove the words"to the degree possible". Directors entered into a lengthy discussion regarding the eleven points In the groundwater producers' letter. A substitute motion was made that Item 1(f) include "to not exceed the useful rrfe of the project". Some Directors expressed concern over the language of Item 1(f)and thought the wording should include"approve in concept". There was concern that the groundwater producers group would then take over the project and they would become the dictators of the project and the OCSD and OCWD control would be negated and would have to comply with every single word on the two- page document of the eleven points. As a point of order a Director questioned if Item 1(f)needed to be voted on to add as an emergency item. General Counsel Brad Hogin explained the item did not need to be added as an urgency Item because it is within the scope of the posted agenda item, which is a broad item of business within the meaning of the Brown Act to discuss authorization to proceed with the development, design and construction of the groundwater replenishment project. This item is requesting to add a specific condition to the general thrust of the proceeding with the project, and not adding an additional agenda item within the meaning of the Brown Act. A question was directed to General Manager Blake Anderson and his thoughts on the wording within#1(f). His suggestion was to leave the language as originally drafted and submitted, or to include"approve in concept". Staff has already expressed to the groundwater producers that each of the eleven points will be considered in good faith. Many of these items have significant technical, managerial and financial merit but the long-term operation of these two agencies belong to OCSD and OCWD. General Manager Bill Mills also recommended the item be adopted as submitted to the directors. Additional discussion was entered into among the Directors. A roll call vote was then called on the substitute motion on Item 1(f)to delete the phrase"to the degree possible"and include deleting the phrase"incorporating a maximum 25—year debt". The motion failed by a vote of 7 ayes to 17 noes. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 03/28/01 Director Swan made a motion that the consideration of the groundwater replenishment project be tabled for 90 days during which time the Joint Cooperative Committee can hire another engineering firm to do a value engineering design on the $34 million sole source design contract to make sure the design is the best that is possible and allow time to answer questions being brought up tonight and to come up with language that will be acceptable between the groundwater producers advisory committee and the Joint Cooperative Committee. The motion failed by a vote of four ayes and 20 noes. It was then MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: A. Find that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)guidelines, Section 15164, that some changes or additions to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR certified in October 1999 are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred and that Addendum No. 1 is approved. B. Find that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)guidelines, Section 15164, that some changes or additions to the EIR/EIS on the Groundwater Replenishment System certified in March 1999 are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred and that Addendum No. 1 is approved. C. Authorize the Orange County Water District, in conjunction with the Orange County Sanitation District, to proceed with the final design, construction and operation of the Phase 1 Groundwater Replenishment System under the direction of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. D. Establish and find that construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System is feasible, necessary, and beneficial to the lands of the District, and establish a project budget of$352 million ($352,000,000). (This item was an Orange County Water District only item. OCSD did not vote on Item 1(d).) E. Approve a budget amendment to the Orange County Sanitation District project budget of$4,478,000 for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No.J-36,for a total project budget of$182,700,000. F. Establish a groundwater producers advisory group and to the degree possible implement the eleven points in the groundwater producers' letter dated March 25,2001. Directors Steve Anderson, Shawn Boyd, John M. Gullixson, Mark Leyes, Mark A. Murphy and Peer Swan opposed. 2. INTERIM GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATIONS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: A. Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System, granting the Orange County Water District Board of Directors authority to award a contract for the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline— Theo Lacy Parking Facility in an amount not to exceed $5 million ($5,000,000)and to Joint Minutes for Board Meeting y Page 8 03/28/01 approve change orders not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount, and granting the Orange County Water District General Manager authority to sign permits and contracts. B. Approve agreement between the Orange County Flood Control District, the County of Orange and the Orange County Water District for providing early construction of Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline within County property adjacent to the Theo Lacy Jail Facilities and for reimbursement of costs for construction of County parking facilities over the pipeline. (This item was an Orange County Water District only Item. OCSD did not vote on Item 2(b). C. Approve the plans and specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline— Theo Lacy Parking Facility, for the early construction of a portion of the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline and parking lot for the Orange County Sheriffs Department and authorize staff to advertise for competitive bids. 3. CONSULTING AND STAFFING SERVICES FOR FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND START-UP SERVICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: A. Approve Addendum No. 3 to Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. increasing the authorized amount by$29,924,187, from$5,039,920 to an amount not to exceed $34,964,107 for final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. B. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Separation Processes Inc.,Task Order No. 201301 increasing the authorized amount by$1,455,530, from$445,880 to an amount not to exceed $1,901,410 for the final design of the Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis components of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District, C. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Task Order No. 201312 with Carl R. Nelson, increasing the authorized amount by$371,000,from $61,200 to an amount not to exceed $432,200 for four years of project support In securing permits, rights-of-way agreements, reviewing plans, and providing liaison with agencies during construction, and water pipeline construction overview. The contract includes annual hourly rates at: • $89 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002 • $92 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003 $95 per hour for April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004 $98 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005 The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 03/28/01 D. Approve a Task Order to Gerald Jones dba Linjer Company,for an amount not to exceed $97,400 for specialty services for the final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System, which includes assistance in developing and implementing the integrated computerized systems and the supporting business plan. The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. E. Approve Addendum No. 4 to Task Order No. 200539 to James W.Williams increasing the authorized amount by$148,400,from$35,000 to an amount not to exceed $183,400 for specialized engineering services for four years of project support for securing permits and rights-of-way agreements, providing technical review,and serving on an independent review team at: • $89 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002 • $92 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003 • $95 per hourforApril 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004 • $98 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005 The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. F. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Task Order No. 202091 with Debra Burris, dba DDB Engineering, Inc., to provide engineering services and serve as Project Coordinator for the Groundwater Replenishment System, increasing the maximum hours from 1500 hours per year to 1800 hours per year, and extending the contract time from October 11, 2003 to October 10, 2005 at hourly rates of: • $90 per hour for October 11, 2003 to October 10, 2004 • $93 per hour, October 11, 2004 to October 10, 2005 (Current approved rates vary from$78.75 per hour for October 11. 2000 to October 10, 2001, to$86.82 per hour for October 11, 2002 to October 10, 2003.) The cost is estimated at$700,000, to be shared equally between Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District. G. Approve a four-year limited-term Orange County Water District employment agreement with Thomas M. Dawes to act as Program Manager for the Groundwater Replenishment System at hourly rates of: • $95 per hour for April 23, 2001 to April 22, 2002 • $97 per hour for April 23,2002 to April 22. 2003 • $99 per hour for April 23, 2003 to April 22, 2004 • $100 per hour for April 23, 2004 to April 23, 2005 The Limited-Term Employment contract provides for hourly rate compensation, no benefits, a maximum pay of 40-hours per week, and contract cancellation on a 30-day notice. The contract amount will be shared equally between Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District. Joint Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 03/28/01 H. Approve a four-year limited-tenn Orange County Water District employment agreement with Laura Thomas to manage project tasks in the electrical and instrumentation disciplines for the Groundwater Replenishment System at hourly rates of: $75 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002 $78.75 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003 $82.69 per hour for April 1,2003 to March 31, 2004 $86.82 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005 The Limited-Term Employment contract provides for hourly rate compensation, no benefits, a maximum pay of 40-hours per week, and contract cancellation on a 30-day notice. The amount shall be shared equally between the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District. Directors Mark Leyes and Peer Swan opposed. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:31�pp.m/. 6' /�/.za Secretary of lt Board o irectors of Orange Count Sanitafib District GAw AtMagenda\Board Mlnutes\2001 BuaM Minutes\032801.iointminutw.dm Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING April 25, 2001 oJNty SAH1Tgr�oy 9 O y Fcr�N HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 04/25/01 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,was held on April 25, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall A Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley A Beth Krom Mike Ward X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A Freschl X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Peer Swan Darryl Miller Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Mark Esquer; Paula Zeller; Sonja Wassgren; Ingrid Hellebrand; Chuck Winsor;Jan Collins; Ryal Wheeler OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Alternate Director Alberta Christy; Don Hughes; Dean Albright; Joey Racano, Irwin Haydock; Jan Vanderslool; Dennis Baker; Don McGee; Greg Saul;Judith M. Gielow; Brian Brady; Greg Woodside;Tony Henrich Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 04/25/01 •� PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver. Don McGee, Jan Vandersloot, Dean Albright, Joey Racano, Irwin Haydock, Dennis Baker. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that if they left the Board Room during the meeting for recusant purposes during a vote,they must notify the Board Secretary or other minute taker that their action should be reflected in the minutes. Leaving the room will not be noted in the minutes. Chair Eckenrode announced that the PDC Committee would be meetin�q on May 17 at 5:00 p.m. The change in date was due to the League of Cities meeting on May 3 . Chair Eckenrode also announced that he was inviting the following Directors to attend upcoming Steering Committee meetings, as follows: May 23, 2001 Director Beth Krom June 27, 2001 Director Tony Kawashima July 18, 2001 Director Alice Jempsa August 22, 2001 Director Tod Ridgeway September 26, 2001 Director Roy Moore As a reminder, the Chair reported that nominations will be open at the Mat 23rd board meeting for the election of the Chair, and the election would take place at the June 27 meeting for both the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District. It was announced the District received an award from the Government Finance Officers Association for the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. This report qualified for a certification of achievement for excellence in financial reporting. The formal presentation of this award will be made at a future meeting. It was also announced that the District was the recipient of the California Water Environment Association's State Award for Small Budget Public Education Program. This award was for the District's Orange County Fair booth in July 2000. Ingrid Hellebrand, Communications Specialist, who was in charge of the effort,was then recognized and gave a brief slide presentation of the effectiveness of the District's booth at the Orange County fair. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, responded to some of the public comments received that evening regarding the District's plan for the next few months relative to the level of treatment of ocean discharge. Efforts would be focused on ocean science, treatment technology and related financing, regulations and permitting issues, and communication outreach. Mr. Anderson then reported the District was in receipt of a report Issued by the Orange County Grand Jury titled "Sewage Spills, Beach Closures: Trouble in Paradise?" The report deals with the management of restaurant grease in Orange County, and recommends there should be standard countywide grease ordinances that specify proper maintenance and the local sewering authority Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 04/25/01 should be required to enforce the ordinances. The report, sent to 50 public entities, will require every agency mentioned in the report to respond within the next 90 days to the issues. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 28, 2001 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and 'B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/01 03/31/01 Totals $4,825,838.23 $5,013,868.88 Director Patterson abstained on warrant number 34663. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11, DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the April 25, 2001 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 28, 2001 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 4, 2001 to be filed. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson, Vice Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the April 5, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 5, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Grit Removal System, Job No. J-52, with Norman A. Olsson Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$73,120 and 20 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $811,547. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the plans and specifications for the Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, on file at the office of the Board Secretary. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 04/25/01 1 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide engineering services for Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No.1.98, for an amount not to exceed $1,166,000; and (2) Approve a budget amendment of$1,354,000 for Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98,for a total budget of$1,709,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing additional engineering services for benefit/cost evaluation of 71 liquid stream reinvention ideas, and the production of eleven additional P&ID drawings, in the amount of$240,945,for a total amount not to exceed$7,736,724. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Establish a budget of$715,000 for Clarifiers E and G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group to provide additional services related to the Capital Project Management Process Phase 1 Report in the amount of$18,969,for a total amount not to exceed $115,886. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 11, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 11, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of March 2001. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Resolution No. OCSD O1-09, amending Resolution No. 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve 2001-02 Budget Allocation and Delegation of Discretionary Authority to the FAHR Committee for Initiation of Forensic Audits or other investigations if determined by the FAHR Committee as necessary, in an amount not to exceed $30,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an At-Will Employment Policy for the Executive Management Team. Directors Gullixson and Leyes opposed. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve agreement with Steve Filarsky of Filarsky&Watt, LLP, to serve as District's Labor Representative re SPMT Group meet and confer process in accordance with the recommendations of the FAHR Committee; and to provide the FAHR Committee with a copy of the executed agreement. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 ° 04/25/01 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 19, 2001 to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (a)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate terms and conditions for a renewal of the contract with BP Energy Company for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28, at the floating Southern California Border price plus marketers premium, with provisions for four one-year extensions, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $3,900,000; and (b)Authorize the General Manager to solicit proposals, negotiate, and award a new contract for the Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. C2001-38-BD, at the floating Southern California Border price plus marketers premium, with provisions for four one-year extensions effective August 1, 2001 per,for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $3,900,000 should the negotiations for a renewal of the contract with BP Energy Company fail; and, (c)Authorize the Director of Finance, If market conditions are favorable,to negotiate fixed prices under the new or renewed natural gas contract, before the effective date of the contract and during the duration of the contract, without further Board authorization. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-lA, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Southern Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1A, for an amount not to exceed $6,329,000. 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No.1 to the Letter Agreement dated September 22, 1999.with Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program, authorizing an increase In the annual funding of$41,250 for years two through five of the program, increasing the total annual amount to $866,250, and a total project amount not to exceed $4,275,863. 19. There was no closed session. 21. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize consideration of Item 21(b) and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. The Director of Engineering gave a brief verbal report. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Flow Accommodation Agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District to allow the US Food &Drug Administration (FDA)to discharge sewage flow from a new FDA laboratory to the Orange County Sanitation District, in a form approved by General Counsel. Director Peer Swan abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 04/25/01 1 Director Peer Swan announced that he would no longer be a Director for the Sanitation District effective May 15, and introduced Brian Brady who will be appointed by Irvine Ranch Water District as the District's representative. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Secretary of 16e Board (rectors of Orange County Sanitati n District G1wodW\agenda\Board Mlnutes\2001 Board Minutes\042501.doc Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 34160 Escrow Solutions $ 525.000.00 Construction 5-52 34161 City of Newport Beach 40,000.00 Construction-District's Share of Dunes Area Nuisance Flow Diversion Project 34162 Orange County Sanitation District 440,699.73 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 34163 Southern California Edison 60,763.36 Power 34164 Airgas Safely 1,215.18 Safely Supplies 34165 Albertson's 17,795.78 Refund Connection Fee 34166 All American Asphalt 8,415.00 Paving 34167 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,589.26 Long Distance Telephone Service 34168 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.77 Telephone Service 34169 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4.698.74 Cellular Telephone Service 34170 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 34171 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 34172 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 103.44 Office Supplies 34173 Court Order 150.00 Wage Gamishment 34174 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,459.31 Electrical Supplies 34175 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 320.00 O&M Meeting Registration-Califomia Water Environment Association 34176 CWEA-TCP 25.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34177 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 34178 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 34179 Verizon California 1,366.57 Telephone Services 34180 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 200.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34181 Intl.Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 34182 Wine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 34183 Lusatia 115.00 Meeting Expense 34184 MarVsc Electronics 16.34 Electrical Paris&Supplies 34185 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 433.21 Plumbing Supplies 34186 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 3,206.36 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training 34187 Optic Software 1,800.00 IT Training Registration 34188 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 34189 OCEA 495.12 Dues Deduction 3419D Pacific Bell 21.98 Telephone Services 34191 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 1.955.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34192 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 34193 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 34194 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.D0 Dues Deduction 34195 Registrar,Air&Waste Management Assoc. 597.95 Air Quality Meeting Registration 34196 Reliastar 8,397.40 Employee Medical Health Premium 34197 Rutan&Tucker L.L.P. 1.922.02 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 34198 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 814.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34199 glamor, Larsen&Marsh 6,500.00 Prof.Sew.-SAR Watershed Group;Chino Basin$1,500 Transfer; Dairy Prod.$2.000 Transfer 34200 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 8.66 Plumbing Supplies 34201 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 34202 Southern California Water 69.01 Water Use 34203 Southern California Water Committee,Inc 750.00 Membership 34204 Sparkletls 1.544.10 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 03101/01 to 03116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34205 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 34206- State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annexation Fee 34207 Stale Board of Equalization 1,200.00 Annexation Fee 34208 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 34209 Stale Board of Equalization 3W.00 Annexation Fee 34210 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,191.07 Mechanical Supplies 34211 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 34212 Water Environment Federation 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration 34213 Jeffrey Brown 1.202.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34214 Pongsakdi Cady 773.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34215 Bradley H.Cagle 280.51 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34216 Danny L. Dillon 397.92 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34217 Robert Gaggle 153.49 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 34218 Andrei loan 792.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34219 Dustin Le 559.94 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34220 Julie A.Matsumoto 788.38 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimbursement 34221 Chung M. Nguyen 329.57 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34222 Jagadish C.Omganti 780.59 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34223 John W.Swindler 692.51 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34224 Robert J.Thiede 1,037.82 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 34225 Michael D.White 812.72 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 34226 Ernest N.Yeboah 785.99 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 34227 Moms C.Ying 197.25 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 34228 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 34229 California Dept.of Fish and Game 1,390.50 SARI Realignment&Protection Fee 34230 Local Agency Formation Commission 6.350.00 Annexation Fee 34231 Orange County Sanitation District 1,563.60 Petiy Cash Reimb. 34232 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 34233 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 34234 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 34235 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 34236 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 34237 State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annexation Fee 34238 University of California, Irvine 35.00 Administration Meeting Registration 34239 RPI/Bio Gro 57,922.51 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 34240 Blue Cross of California 186,266.51 Medical Insurance Premium 34241 Carollo Engineers 53.940.39 Engineering Service P266 34242 Computerized Facility Integration 56.750.00 Engineering Service J-25-1 34243 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 66,525.30 Computers-4 Servers&2 Printers 34244 Hach Company 25,279.62 Meters&Accessories 34245 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28.093.52 Medical Insurance Premium 34246 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 57,453.55 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 34247 Margate Construction, Inc. 431,191.00 Construction P2-39 34248 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 58,837.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 34249 Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. 45.000.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Digester No.9 at Pit. 1 34250 Orange County Sanitation District 27.611.36 Worker'.Comp. Reimb. Page 2 of 9 ` Claims Paid From 03/01/01 to 03115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34251 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 88,547.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 34252 Polydyne, Inc. 36,646.62 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 34253 Projects Partners 71,893.28 Temporary Employment Services 34254 So.Cal.Gas Company 33.067.64 Natural Gas 34255 Tule Ranch/Megan Farms 75,233.93 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 34256 Vulcan 25,497.68 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 34257 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 76,672.33 Legal Services MO7-26-95 34258 J W Contracting Corporation 36,333.00 Construction P2-60 34259 Olssan Construction,Inc. 45,500.00 Fuzzy Filler Piping Installation 34260 A Biederman,Inc. 32.20 Instruments 34261 A-Plus Systems 7,855.70 Notices&Ads 34262 Accutite Fasteners, Inc. 166.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34263 Action Door Repair Corporation 500.00 Door Repairs 34264 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,254.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34265 Alfa-Laval,Inc. 4,499.53 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34266 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 675.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 34267 Aquenl, Inc. 8,131.25 Temporary Employment Services 34268 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 34269 Artistic Blinds 403.20 Mini Blinds&Installation 34270 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal 34271 RO Instruments 30D.00 O&M Meeting Registration 34272 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 63.95 Telephone Service 34273 AWRA 500.00 Sponsor-American Water Resources Assoc. 34274 Baker Recognition Solutions 1,272.02 Employee Service Awards 34275 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 21,515.00 Telephone Equipment 34276 Robert Beshura 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 34277 Battery Specialties 31.25 Batteries 34278 Bauer Compressors 144.99 Safety Equipment Repairs 34279 Bentley Systems,Inc. 5,375.01 Software Maintenance Agreement 34280 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 16,777.17 Professional Services-P7-76 34281 Blinn&Young,Inc. 4,235.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies 34282 Boot Bern 64.49 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 34283 Breit F.Sanders,Ph.D 1.500.00 Professional Services-TAC Meetings J-85 34284 Kevin Briggs 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34285 Richard Buck 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34286 Bush&Associates,Inc. 4,200.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 34287 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 437.09 Wire Rigging 34288 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,157.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34289 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 120.00 Membership 34290 Southern California Marine Institute 20,465.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 34291 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 12,265.00 Engineering Services-EXTRAN Modeling Services 34292 Capital Westward 1,382.45 Mechanical Parts 34293 Cardinal Scale Manufacturing Co. 953.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34294 Career Track 533.36 Source Control Training Registration 34295 Cad Warren&Co. 505.84 Insurance Claims Administrator 34296 Carrillo Engineers 2.11M.50 Engineering Services-J-66&IMANS Testing Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34297 Caltrcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1,105.76 Engineering Services-J-52 34298 Chapman Unheisi(y 7.500.00 Leadership Training Fees 34299 Clayton Controls 214.17 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 34300 Coast Fire Equipment 1,156.07 Service Agreement 34301 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 4,080.00 Professional Services-08 M Budget Process Manual Preparation 34302 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,636.12 Electrical Supplies 34303 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 44.19 Plumbing Supplies 34304 Converse Consultants 4,469.00 Consulting Services-11-17-3 34305 Cooper Energy Services 3,686.32 Engine Supplies 34306 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 34307 Corporate Express Imaging 944.89 Computer Supplies 34308 Corporate Express 938.00 Office Supplies 34309 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 34310 Cost Containment Solutions 640.82 Workers Comp.Services 34311 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 16.03 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 34312 Auditor Controller Collections 4,028.00 Parcel Map Landbase Data 34313 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,266.92 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 34314 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Repairs 8 Maintenance 34315 Cytec Industries 14,499.00 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 34316 CASA 225.00 ECM Meeting Registration 34317 CCP Industries 5,287.19 Janitorial Supplies 34318 CEM Corporation 316,93 Lab Maintenance 34319 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5,455.13 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3.38.1 34320 CR 8 R, Inc. 946.00 Container Rentals 34321 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 34322 CT Electric 11,250.00 Outdoor Lighting Installation at Plant No. 2 34323 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 145.00 Laboratory Meeting Registration 34324 CWEA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34325 De Guelle Glass Co.,Inc. 1,184.46 Safety Glass 34326 Del Mar Analytical 408,00 Biosolids Analysis 34327 Najef J. Deriss 748.21 Reconciliation User Fee Program 34328 Detector Technology 1,108.75 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 34329 DeZunk do Misco/Southwest 12.058.47 Plumbing Supplies,Repairs 8 Maintenance Materials 34330 Diamond H Recognition 249.80 Employee Service Awards 34331 Brian D. Donnelly 830.38 User Fes Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34332 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 235.98 Paint Supplies 34333 DDB Engineering,Inc. 9.060.00 Temporary Employment Services 34334 DGA Consultants,Inc. 1,836.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 34335 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 337.34 Electrical Supplies 34336 Earth Resource Foundation 1,500.00 Sponsorship 34337 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 808.00 Medical Screening 34338 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 34339 Emironmental Sampling Supply,Inc. 222.04 Lab Supplies 34340 EquipCc 901.33 Instrument Mainl. 34341 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,D37.79 Professional Services-Legislative Advomle 34342 FedEx Corporation 91.96 Air Freight Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 03101/01 to 03/16101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34343 Albert Feese 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34344 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 309.84 Lab Supplies 34345 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1,739.46 Pump Supplies 34346 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 20,209.09 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 34347 Fountain Valley Camera 31.72 Photo Supplies 34348 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 265.48 Truck Wash Tickets 34349 Franklin Covey 31.18 Office Supplies 34350 Fry's Electronics 409.51 Computer Supplies 34351 FM Intema9onal, Inc. 1,785.29 Professional Services J-25-1 34352 G&L Realty Partnership L.P. 748.21 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34353 Ganshl Lumber Company 94.34 LumberlHardware 34354 GanaO-Callahan Company 2,547.71 Chemicals 34355 Gemini Associates,Inc. 14,272.25 Fiber Optic Cable 34356 George Yardley Co. 326.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34357 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 121.65 Ball Filler Press Supplies 34358 Gold Systems,Inc. 3.485.00 Professional Services-Ocean Data Collection,Storage&Interface 34359 Golden Ball Products 11.583.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes 34360 WW Grainger,Inc. 1.177.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34361 Great Scott Tree Service,Inc. 7.040.00 Tree Planting Services 34362 Wayne Griffin 630.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34363 GMN Company,L.L.C. 3,125.38 Sewer Service Fee Rebate 34364 Edwards Systems Technology 2,168.75 Service Agreement-Fire Ala"System 34365 Verizon California 4.707.44 Telephone Services 34366 Harbour Engineering Group 21,486.10 Wemco Impellers&Pump Supplies 34367 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 34388 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 279.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34369 Herb's Blackforeat Bakery&Deli 35.00 Meeting Expenses 34370 Henan Miller Workplace Resource 175.44 Light Fixture 34371 Hilo,Inc. 1,618.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34372 HoeriNger Service, Inc. 47.78 Compressor Pans 34373 The Holman Group 710.00 Employee Assistance Program Premium 34374 Home Depot 297.64 Small Hardware 34375 Holey Equipment Company 722.16 Repair Hot Water Pressure Washer 34376 Hub Auto Supply 229.46 Truck Parts 34377 I. D. Industries, Inc. 27.99 Electrical Supplies 34378 Imaging Plus, Inc. 117.65 Printing Service 34379 Industrial Distribution Group 1.315.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34380 Industrial Metal Supply 857.86 Aluminum Pipe&Maintenance Material 34381 IBM Corp. 6.064.45 IBM ASI400 Lease 34382 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 34383 J&B Auto Parts 92.36 Auto Parts&Supplies 34384 J&L Industrial Supply 107.14 Tools 34385 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 774.00 Instrument Supplies 34336 Jackbilt,Inc. 2,711.59 Sewer Service Fee Rebate 34387 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 5,990.86 Misc.Construction Services-Tunnel Covers,Vents,Gas Flaps 34368 Janke Lujan 1,152.50 Claim-Sewer Lateral Connection Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03/16/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34389 Jays Catering 1.501.29 Meeting Expenses 34390 Thermo Wesbonics 320.81 Thermal Chart Paper 34391 John Wiley&Sons,Inc. 118.39 Publication 34392 Johnstone Supply 253.23 Electrical Supplies 34393 JLM Contracting 14,061.79 Construction Service-Pipe Repair 34394 Karen Monaco&Associates 12.875.00 FIS Support Services 34395 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 768.50 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 34396 Kelly Paper 76.70 Paper 34397 Lab Support 2.019.63 Temporary Employment Services 34398 Lee&Ro,Inc. 14.720.25 Engineering Consulting Services-P1.68&P2.39 34399 Lexis-Nexis 115.48 Books&Publications 34400 LmI ert Cassidy 188.50 Professional Service-Human Resources 34401 Gerald R.Jones 4,414.82 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 34402 Long Beach Line-X 3,640.00 Truck Supplies-Fiberglass Track Lle Covers 34403 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2.582.30 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 34404 Memco International 709.50 Janitorial Supplies 34405 Mary Buenaventura 78.00 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34406 MarVac Electronics 9.57 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34407 Masune Company 17.55 Safety Supplies 34408 Matt Chler,Inc. 4,075.74 Valves 34409 The McCraw-Hill Companies 76.54 Publication 34410 McRay Industries,Inc. 513.59 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34411 Media Clips,Inc. 172.80 Notices 34412 Micro Motion, Inc. $10.08 Electrical Pads If Supplies - 34413 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,492.75 Mechanical Pars&Supplies 34414 Mission Uniform Service 5.147.19 Uniform Rentals 34415 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 34416 MoloPholo 83.36 Photographic Services 34417 MAP 1,500.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs 34418 MI Services Group,Inc. 500.00 Human Resources Tmining Registration 34419 National Plant Services.Inc. 3,825.00 Vacuum Truck Services 34420 National Technical Information Service 1.579.50 Publication 34421 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,169.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 34422 Norms Refrigeration 292.77 Electric Parts 34423 NST Network Support Team 2,571.63 Computer Server Consulting Services 34424 Office Depot Business Services Div. 423.43 Office Supplies 34425 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 6.896.26 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Bemchmarking Study 34426 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 362.81 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34427 Robert Dolan 555.20 Meeling7fraining Expense Reimbursement 34428 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 672.21 Pump Equipment 34429 Orange County Hose Company 53.86 Hose,Supplies&Repairs 34430 Orange County Winwater Works 65.78 Plumbing Supplies 34431 Ortiz Fire Protection 3.635.00 Service Agreement 34432 Oxygen Service Company 1,713.31 Specialty Gases 34433 OCB Reprographics 10.573.35 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 34434 Ol Analytical 558.73 Lab Supplies Page 6 of 9 1e Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34435 P.L Hawn Company,Inc. 1.109.37 Electrical Supplies 34436 Pace-Butler Corp. 175.00 Printer Repair 34437 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3.591.08 Plumbing Supplies 34438 Pacific Pails and Controls, Inc. 819.20 Electrical Supplies 34439 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 11,117.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34440 Pagenel 2,555.24 Paging Services 34441 Warren D.Parchan 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34442 Parker Supply Company 4,564.46 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34443 Parts Unlimited 379.67 Truck Supplies 34444 Reber Peterson 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34445 Petroleum Traders Corporation 14.596.60 Gasoline 34446 Barbara Pomykata 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34447 Hach c/o Penton Industries 13.991.39 Quick View Camera System-Source Control 34448 Power Design 9,669.75 Electrical Supplies 34449 Primary Source 229.15 Office Furniture 34450 Project Management Institute 170.15 Publication 34451 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 822.50 Mechanical Supplies 34452 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 155.00 Instrument Repair 34453 R.T.Corporation 138.00 Lab Supplies 34454 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.96 Trash Removal 34455 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7.940.78 Life Insurance Premium 34456 Relaon 2,789.16 Printing 34457 Revoo Technologies 556.08 Electrical Parrs&Supplies 34458 RPM Electric Motors 489.61 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34459 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 15.710.00 Construction -Manhole Repair 34460 Santa Ana Electric Motors 405.28 Motor 34461 Schwing America,Inc. 83.49 Pump Supplies 34462 City of Seal Beach 107.64 Water Use 34463 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 7,740.00 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 34464 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 257.18 Tools/Hardware 34465 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 410.03 Tools/Hardware 34466 Supelce,Inc. 952.40 Lab Supplies 34467 Dana Singer 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34468 SoflChoice 163.03 Software 34469 Southern California Edison 2,201.89 Power 34470 Karl Sperling 748.21 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34471 Stanley B.Grant,Ph.D 1.000.00 Professional Services-J-85(TAC) 34472 Michael Stone 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34473 Strata International,Inc, 1,110.92 Chemicals 34474 Sun International 296.37 Lab Supplies 34475 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,413.87 Mechanical Supplies 34476 SARBS-CWEA 50.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 34477 SPEC Services,Inc. 3,526.91 Engineering Services J-33-1 34478 Team,Inc. 1,277.10 Valves 34479 Tatra Tech,Inc. 16.746.78 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 34480 Textile Engineering Associates 8,713.15 Belt Press Supplies Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34481 The Foxboro Company 1,823.78 Instrument Supplies 34482 The Orange County Register 3,300.30 Notices&Ads 34483 Thermo Forme 1.203.68 Lab Repairs&Maintenance 34484 Thomas Conveyor Company 5,881.40 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 34485 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 227.38 Biosolids Analysis 34486 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,111.88 Mechanical Supplies 34487 Tierra Tractor 355.00 Tres Planting Services 34488 Time Motion Tools 7.17 Freight Charges 34489 Dally Pilot 56.25 Notices&Ads 34490 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 2.650.00 Easement Weed Abatement 34491 TreMC Control Service,Inc 263.38 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 34492 Tran Consulting Engineers 13,425.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects-Pi-65 34493 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskesping MO 5-11-94 34494 Truce&Auto Supply,Inc. 239.13 Truck Supplies 34495 Turblex,Inc. 7.559.69 Repairs&Maintenance of Turblex Blovrers 34496 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,702.96 Lab Supplies 34497 Teksystems 6,140.00 Temporary Employment Services 34498 Ultra Scientific 1,026.95 Lab Supplies 34499 The Unisource Corporation 187.79 Office Supplies 34500 United Parcel Service 60.53 Parcel Services 34501 Industrial Air Compressor 407.67 Filters 34502 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,501.18 Plumbing Supplies 34503 Ronald Vander Macron 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34504 The Vantage Group,L.L.D. 17,654.00 Temporary Employment Service - 34505 Vema's Plumbing 237.50 Plumbing Equipment Service 346M Villa Ford 24,486.10 2001 Ford F-260 Truck 34507 Vision Service Plan(CA) 7,217.64 Vision Service Premium 34508 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,11SZ05 Lab Supplies 34509 The Wackenhut Corporation 1,066.50 Security Guards 34510 Donald Well 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks 34511 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 16,666.07 Engineering Service J-67 34512 Waxle Sanitary Supply 223.94 Janitorial Supplies 34513 Western States Chemical,Inc. 5,879.99 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 34514 WEF 122.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 34515 Xerox Corporation 16,952.35 Copier Leases 34616 Zumro,Inc. 2,507.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34517 Southern Contracting Company 23,919.00 Construction-J-33-1 34518 Union Bark of California 4,037.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 34519 Michael D.Moore 37.27 Mesting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 34520 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,606.00 Seyrer Service Fee Administration 34521 Dustin Balker&Guy Barker 74.0g Claim-Bicycle Damage 34522 City of Fountain Valley 1,865.00 Hazardous Materiels Disclosure Fee Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,580,306.46 Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 03/01101 to 03/16101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlptlon Payroll Disbursements, 22470-22596 Employee Paychecks $ 176,515.23 Biweekly Payroll 03107101 22597-22602 Interim Paychecks 1,398.57 Directors 58652.59107 Direct Deposit Statements 718,871.07 Biweekly Payroll 03/07/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 896.784.87 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 97.711.80 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 251,035.10 Febmary Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 345,746.90 Total Claims Paid 03/01/01 -03116101 $ 4,825,838.23 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 34523 American Express $ 36.077.21 Purchasing Cam Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 34524 Orange County Sanitation District 442,496.83 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 34525 Southern California Edison 73.893.83 Power 34526 Airgas Safety 2.602.23 Safety Supplies 34527 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 202.67 Mechanical Supplies 34528 Association of Calif.Water Agencies 165.00 Communications Meeting Registration 34529 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 150.00 Permit Fee 34530 ASSE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 2,957-00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 34531 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 385.91 Telephone Service 34532 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 173.49 Telephone Service 34533 Voided Check - - 34534 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 34535 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 34536 BNI Building News 98.78 Publication 34537 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 34538 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 53.28 Electrical Supplies 34539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 465.70 Plumbing Supplies 34540 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 131.00 Easement Fee-Contract 5-46 34541 CSMFO-GASB Update 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration-California Society of Municipal Finance Officers 34542 CW EA 2001 Annual Conference 1,445.00 O&M Meeting Registration-California Water Environment Association 34543 Donald Paul&Laura P.Dicker 1,063.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34544 Engineering News Record 99.00 Subscription 34545 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 34546 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 34547 Industrial Metal Supply 754.02 Metal 34548 Intl.Union of Oper Erg AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 34549 Irvine Ranch Water District 31.56 Water Use 34550 James F.McConnell 1,625.00 Meeting7Training Expense Reimbursement 34551 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 312.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34552 Mellon Trust 18,581.82 Investment Custodian Bank 34553 William M.Moline 649.26 Check Reissue for Stale Dated Payroll Check 34554 Munoz Coin Laundry 556.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 34555 National Notary Association 59.00 Office Supplies 34556 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resod 1,822-98 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training 34557 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 34558 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,010.83 Plumbing Paris&Supplies 34559 OCEA 495A2 Dues Deduction 34560 Pacific Bell 1,134.02 Telephone Services 34561 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 34562 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 34563 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 34564 SkillPath Seminars 399.00 Information Technology Training Registration 34565 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 34566 Thompson industrial Supply,Inc. 1,935.26 Mechanical Supplies 34567 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 03116/01 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34568 Unocal 76 183.03 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38.1 Inspection 34569 Vedzon California 887.31 Telephone Services 34570 Layne T.Baroldi 155.96 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 34571 Shabbir S.Basra! 423.58 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34672 Mark A.Esquer 789.48 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 34573 Clarice M. Marcin 230.18 Meeling/Traming Expense Reimbursement 34574 Michael D.Moore 251.43 Meeting/lraining Expanse Reimbursement 34575 Samuel L.Mowbray 826.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34576 Mark S.Roberts 504,48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34577 United Stales Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 34578 RPI/Bio Gro 219,502.13 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 34579 Black&Veatch Corporation 26,907.10 Professional Services-J-71.3 34560 Black&Veatch Corporation 69,852.57 Engineering Services Pi-76 34581 Brown&Caldwell 141,627.21 Engineering Services P1-37 34582 Caroib Engineers 73,727.33 Enti needng Services P2-66&J-39 34583 Computerized Facility Inlergmtion 34.507.95 Engineering Service J-25-1 34584 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 132,147.08 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 34585 Lee&Ro, Inc. 45,421.99 Engineering Consulting Services 5.49,5-50.5.51 &5.52 34586 Municipal Water Dist,of Orange County 29,643.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 34587 Orange County Water District 322,469.18 GW RS Cooperative Project 34588 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 555.607.38 Engineering Services J-42,J-3&1 34589 Synagro West,Inc. 163,353.16 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 34590 Reliaslar 54,801.98 Employee Medical Health Premium 34591 South Coast Environmental Co. 43,761.25 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 34592 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 80,722.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 34593 Woodru0,Spradlin&Smart 67.950.57 Legal Services MO 7-28-95 34694 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 61,380.00 Construction J-63 34595 Harbor Bay,Inc. 33.165.00 Cona truction J-60 34596 A-Plus Systems 254.60 Notices&Ads 34597 Acculite Fasteners,Inc 275.63 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 34598 AccuStandard,Inc. 1,473.40 Lab Supplies 34699 Advanced Sealing It Supply Co., Inc. 940.48 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 34600 Aearo Company 1,956.00 Safety Supplies 34601 Air Liquids America Corp. ISSAS Specialty Gasses 34602 Air Products&Chemicals 24,136.35 O If M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 34603 Airborne Express 65.35 Air Freight 34604 All American Asphalt 4,961.44 Paving 34605 American Digital Cartography,Inc. 3,050.00 Professional Services J-73-2 34606 Appleone Employment Service 4,878.30 Temporary Employment Services 34607 Aquem,Inc. 1.887.50 Temporary Employment Services 34608 Arcus Dale Security 254.00 OBslle Back-Up Tape Storage for NIT Server 34609 Argo Intemational Corporation 5.078.60 Electrical Parts It Supplies 34610 Ascelte Training Company 2,319.75 Information Technology Training Registration 34611 ASM International 1,665.00 O&M Training Registration 34612 ASM Press 53.45 Publication 34613 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 69.19 Telephone Service v Page 2 of a , Claims Paid From 03/16/01 to 03/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34614 AWSI 500.00 Department of Transportation Training Program-Advanced Workplace Strategies 34615 8&B Electronics 117.41 Lab Paris&Supplies 34616 Battery Specialties 465.43 Batteries 34617 BluMedeux Vilek,Inc. 648.76 Lab Supplies 34618 Blair-Martin Co.,Inc. 406.96 Valve Manifolds 34619 Boyle Engineering Corporation 24,765.27 Engineering Services 1.24,2.31 &2.50 34620 Burke engineering Co. 328.60 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34621 Callrol,Inc. 361.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34622 Cambridge Isotope Labs 660.87 Lab Supplies 34623 Cad R.Nelson,P.E. 3,280.00 Engineering Consultant 2.41 34624 Carollo Engineers 102.50 Engineering Services-IMANS Testing 34625 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 23.377.50 Engineering Services P2.82 34626 Chapman University 7,500.00 Leadership Training Fees 34627 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,279.23 Copier Lease 34628 City of Costa Mesa 19,305.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation 346M City of Fountain Valley 12.901.68 Water Use 34630 Compaq Computer Corporation 1,730.75 Computer Supplies 34631 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9.862.50 Computer Malm.Agreement 34632 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,225.33 Electrical Supplies 34633 Contemporary Controls 455.62 Electrical Supplies 34034 Converse Consultants 638.50 Consulting Services P2-60 34835 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 34636 Corporate Express 973.51 Office Supplies 34637 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 34638 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc 52.17 Mechamcal Parts&Supplies 34639 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.779.72 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34640 Crane America Services,Inc. 2.500.00 Crane Services 34641 CASA 450.00 Tech.Services&Environmental Compl.&Monitoring Meetirgrtraining Registration 34642 CCP Industries 2,723.71 Janitorial Supplies 34643 Kelly Christensen-CHMIA Cont Reg. 200.00 Meelingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 34644 CH2MHi11 17,943.04 Engineering Service J-71-4 34645 CH2MHi11 1,905.46 Engineering Services J-403 34646 California Pipeline Inspection 662.95 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3-38-1 34647 CWFA 2001 Annual Conference 55.00 Source Control Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34648 CWEA Membership 204.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34649 Del Mar Analytical 1,953.00 Biosolids Analysis 34650 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 428.80 Valves 34651 Diamond H Recognition 229.17 Employee Service Awards 34652 Dionex Corporation 925.00 Lab Maintenance 34653 Dubois Towing 281.00 Towing 34654 DOB Engineering,Inc. 4,260.00 Temporary Employment Services 34655 DGA Consultants,Inc. 288.00 Surveying Services MO 63-94 34656 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 5,844.30 Electrical Supplies 34657 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 563.00 Medical Screening 34658 Electra-Bond 698.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34659 Electrical Systems Engineering Co. 7,362.00 Testing Contract J-33.1 Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34660 Enchanter,Inc. 600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 34661 Environmental Resource Assoclation/ERA 1,473.90 Lab Supplies 34662 Exterminstics of Southern California 1,680.00 Exterminator Services 34663 EC Construction Co. 1,074.00 Manhole Repairs If Maintenance 34664 FedEx Corporation 35.16 Air Freight 34665 Allied Supply Company 3.258.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34666 CSC/Fibenron 475.19 Fiber Optic Cable 34667 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,224.46 Lab Supplies 34668 Flo-Systems,Inc. 4,314.16 Pump Supplies 34669 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 20,348.63 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 34670 Fountain Valley Camera 31.72 Photo Supplies 34671 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 175.99 Truck Wash Tickets 34672 Franklin Covey 154.59 Office Supplies 34673 FMs Electronics 659.82 Computer Supplies 34674 City of Fullerton 138.26 Water Use 34675 Ganshl Lumber Company 733.46 Lumber/Hardware 34676 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 0,646.45 Bell Filter Press Supplies 34677 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,989.24 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34678 Graybar 3,829.10 Electrical Supplies 34679 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 59.25 Lab Parts If Supplies 34680 Hasker Equipment Company 17,238.35 Truck Supplies&Repairs 34681 Hach rJo Ponton Industries 1,250.55 Lab Supplies 34682 Harbour Engineering Group 5.353.50 Pump Supplies 34683 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 937.64 Plumbing Supplies 34684 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 1,893.19 Engine Generator Control Supplies&Repairs 34685 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 08.00 Meeting Expenses 34686 Hoerblger Service, Inc. 675.80 Compressor Pans 34687 The Holman Group 708.58 Employee Assistance Program Premium 34688 Home Depot 191.78 Small Hardware 34689 City of Huntington Beach 16,237.36 Water Use 34690 Huntington Supply Co.,Inc. 79.28 Hardware 34691 I.D.Industries,Inc. 261,84 Electrical Supplies 34692 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,413.94 Printing Service 34693 Industrial Distribution Group 2,201.38 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 34694 Industrial Metal Supply 130.88 Metal 34695 Industrial Plastic Supply,Inc. 788.10 Plastic 34696 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 93.31 Lab Supplies 34697 Inside EPA 300.00 Publication 34698 Irvine Ranch Water District 19.74 Water Use 34699 law, Inc. $28.75 Lab Supplies 34700 J&L Industrial Supply 239.44 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34701 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 264.21 Lab Pans&Supplies 34702 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 14,342.56 Misc.Conatrucllon Services-Irrigation Valve Work 34703 Jays Catering 745.25 Meeting Expenses 34704 John's Frilly Grille 387.80 Engineering Meeting Expenses-J-35-2 34705 Johnstone Supply 249.19 Electrical Supplies a Page 4 of 8 er � Claims Paid From 03/16104 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34708 K.H.Watts Co. 487.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34707 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,937.50 FIS Support Services 34705 Kerry Consulting Group 64.61 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 34709 Knott Laboratory,Inc. 2.190.00 Professional Services-Claim of Than vs. Kovacs 34710 Lab Safely Supply,Inc. 100.90 Safety Supplies 34711 Lab Support 642.00 Temporary Employment Services 34712 Law Journal Press 70.85 Publication 34713 Law Offices of Kinkle, Rodiger&Spriggs 1.676.90 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 34714 Lexis-Nexis 455.82 Publication 34715 Gerald R.Jones 7,683.85 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 34716 Line-X Protective Coatings 342.00 Protective Coaling for V471 34717 Uniform Center 9,013.88 Uniforms 34718 Luccl's 80.50 Meeting Expense 34719 Lustre-Cal 3,092.85 Reflective Vehicle Decals 34720 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 099.85 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 34721 Maintenance Technology Corp. 519.74 Mechanical Supplies 34722 Mantek 334.02 Custodial Equipment/Supplies; 34723 MarVac Electronics 186.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34724 Mc Junkln Corporation 339.44 Plumbing Supplies 34725 The McGraw-Hill Companies 157.01 Publication 34726 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.408.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34727 McMillan Design,Inc. 729.18 Lob Parts&Supplies 34728 Mec Analytical System 15,153.40 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 34729 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 966.10 Mechanical Repairs 34730 Medlin Controls Co. 2,770.84 Instrument Supplies 34731 Metal Supply,Inc. 288.10 Metal 34732 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 34733 Michael's Stores.Inc. 488.48 Photo Supplies&Services 34734 Mid-Weal Associates 22.831.19 SHP TR Muncher&Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34735 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 1,995.D0 Mechanical Repairs 34736 Mission Uniform Service 4,288.27 Uniform Rentals 34737 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 34738 Morton Salt 533.07 Salt 34739 National Institute of Bids&Technology 1,127.DD Lab Supplies 34740 National Micmcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 34741 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,580.00 Vacuum Truck Services 34742 Neal Supply Co. 3,901.46 Plumbing Supplies 34743 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1,445.06 Security System Maintenance 34744 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Construction Management Training Registration 34745 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resat 974.90 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training 34746 Nlckey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,042.55 LubricanttDiesel Fuel 34747 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,357.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 34748 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 34749 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,751.20 Lab Services 34750 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 665.00 Lab Services 34751 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,049.29 Office Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34752 O C Wholesale Electric 67.08 Electrical Supplies 34753 Optio Software 5,505.00 Computer Hardware/Software,Maintenance 34754 Orange County Tan Collector 2,874.64 2ral Installment Property Taxes for 810 E.Balboa Blvd.,Newport Beach 34755 Orange County Winwaler Works 337.10 Plumbing Supplies 34756 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,853.04 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 34757 Oxygen Service Company 2,964.79 Specially Gases 34758 OCB Reprographics 7.58 Priming Service-MO 1/26/00 34759 OCE-USA,Inc. 372.95 Computer Equipment Mainl. 34760 OI Analytical 199.83 Lab Supplies 34761 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 5,879.78 Air Conditioner Fillers,Parts&Repairs 34762 Pacific Bell 23.73 Telephone Services 34763 Padfic Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 34764 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3.758.47 Plumbing Supplies 34765 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 902.80 Electrical Supplies 34766 Parker Supply Company 4,183.41 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34767 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 16,763.22 Construction-Sewer Repair 34768 Petroleum Traders Corporation 14,570.89 Gasoline 34769 Plan Sak 59.43 Stationery&Office Supplies 34770 Polydyne,Inc. 4.209.59 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 34771 Postmaster 750.00 Post Office Box Rental 34772 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.50 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 34773 Pulsafesder,Im. 413.96 Freight Charges 34774 Pump Engineering&/or Q Air 1,835.73 Compressor Oil&Supplies 34775 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 34776 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services 347T7 R.M.Young Company 2,138.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 34778 Randolph Austin Co. 620.00 Plumbing Supplies 34779 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 22,178.55 Pumps-Digester 34780 Rote Rooter-N.O.C.#11 135.00 Sewer Line Repair&Maintenance 34781 Rulan&Tucker L.L.P. 6,300.46 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 34782 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 990.00 Engineering Services-Repair Warehouse Roof at Plant 1 34783 RPM Electric Motors 4,185.95 Pump Repairs 34784 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 16,402.50 Construction -Manhole Repair 34785 Sdmvirg America,ix. 108.55 Pump Supplies 34786 Sears Industrial Sales 32.81 Mechanical Supplies 34787 Saavenlures 2,850.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 34788 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,060.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34789 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 74.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34790 Supelco,Inc. S03.79 Lab Supplies 34791 Smaman Supply Company/Orange Coast 22.10 Plumbing Supplies 34792 SoftView Computer Products 549.28 Ergonomic Office Equipment 34793 SoftChdce 7,809.13 Software 34794 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 224.74 Permit Fees 34795 Southern California Edison 28.37 Power 34796 Southern California Water Company 670.00 Refund Permit Fee 34797 Sparklelts 1,795.15 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals e Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 03/16101 to 03/31101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34798 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 3,574.25 Instrument Supplies 34799 $pax Cedprep,Inc. 43.41 Lab Supplies 34800 State Chemical Mfg,Co. 120.82 Janitorial Supplies 34801 Sunset Industrial Parts 3,678.24 Mechanical Supplies 34802 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 2,298.00 Lab Analytical Service 34803 Telog Instruments,Inc. 1,257.10 Electrical Pens 8 Supplies 34804 Textile Engineering Associates 4,021.58 Mechanical Paris S Supplies 34805 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 7.674.96 Motors 34806 Time Warner Communicallons 40.47 Cable Services 34807 Total News Tracking 70.50 OCN News Clip-03/05/01 at 6:00 p.m. 34808 Trade Service Corporation 2,063.36 Software Maint. 34809 Tren Consulting Engineers 21,630.00 Engineering Services 546 34810 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. 1,610.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 34811 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,395.00 Lab Services 34812 Teksystems 2,340.00 Temporary Employment Services 34813 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 4,525.00 Instrument Maintenance 34814 The Unisource Corporation 661.13 OBice Supplies 34815 United Parcel Service 645.31 Parcel Services 34816 Unocal 76 60.91 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38.1 Inspection 34817 USFlller Westates Carbon 414.50 Hazardous Waste Disposal 34818 Valley Cities Supply Company 673.07 Plumbing Supplies 34819 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 6,299.50 Generators 34820 Varian Instrument Group 977.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 34821 Vedtect 2.895.00 Software Support 8 Maintenance 34822 Vedzon California 130.26 Telephone Services 34823 Veme's Plumbing 1,324.99 Plumbing Equipment Service 34624 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.232.40 Vision Service Premium 34825 Vortex Industries,Ina 3,072.77 Door Repair 34826 Vulcan 20.989.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 34827 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 5,557.18 Lab Supplies 34828 The Wackenhut Corporation 3.199.50 Security Guards 34829 Water Environment Federation 138.00 Membership 34830 Waxie Sanitary Supply 852.21 Janitorial Supplies 34831 West Group 251.00 Subscription 34832 Western Sandblasting Company 600.00 Sandblasting 34833 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 7.232.81 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95 34834 WEF 204.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 34835 Xerox Corporation 10,062.94 Copier 8 FAX Leases 8 Supplies 34835 The Yakima Company 19,112.23 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 34537 York International 173.72 Electrical Supplies 34838 3T Equipment Company 4.035.70 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 34839 Robert M.Bell 221.22 Mealing?raining Expense Reimbursement 34840 Kimberly C.Christensen 1,035.72 Mesting?reining Expense Reimbursement 34841 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 100.00 Source Control Training Registration-Calif.Water Environment Association 34842 Norma C.Leopando 1,687.49 Meeting/7relnin9 Expense Reimbursement 34843 Michael D.Moore 543.01 Meelin9/7reining Expense Reimbursement Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 03/16/01 to 03131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34844 Mark A.Tomko 351.69 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 34845 Michael I.Zedek 474.53 Meetingri-mining Expense Reimbursement 34846 Margate Construction,Inc. 9,540.00 Construction,Retention-Extension of Reclaimed Water Line 34847 Orange County Sanitation District 1,450.36 Petty Cash Reimb. 34848 Montgomery Watson 6,707.92 Professional Services-2.21-1 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,533,311.57 Payroll Disbursements 22603-22721 Employee Paychecks $ 163.873.60 Biweekly Payroll 03/21/01 22722-22722 Interim Paycheck 10,207.20 Termination Paycheck 22723-22723 Interim Paycheck 103.96 Director 22724-22725 Interim Paychecks 31,442.07 Termination Paychecks 59108-59559 Direct Deposit Statements 735,956.90 biweekly Payroll 03121/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 941,683.73 Wire Transfer Payments Slate Street Bank 8 Trost Co.of CA $ 538.973.58 March Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Total Wine Transfer Payments $ 538,973.58 Total Claims Paid 03116101 to 03131/00 $ 5.013.868.88 Page 8 of 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To%cr .Dir. o51z3io1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular meeting. For new Directors' information, we have included,below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board O:".dWu9nftu1.N NpmdR R 1.1W01 eam n d.R.WR>N5IMM 1.d. Rv md. MOM Page 1 meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS G:1vy dlebBedelBoard A,,nE Rep 11=018-1d Alvdn R.P.,W%1111em 7 Ea[ RBxS¢d: W20.9 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date TUBG.or Dir. 05/23/O1 AGENDA REPORT em Number I[em Number 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CECIA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 04/01/01 - 04/15/01 and 04/16/01 - 04/30/01 G],addagend.rewrd Aoanda ReWBUOOt Beard Agenda ReWStl Wtrlrenn B.dad w.ew Mo.. Page 1 Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Wam mta 34849 City of Newport Beach $ 38,690.00 Cooperative Project-541-1 34850 Orange County Sanitation District 464,577.57 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 34851 PaineWebber Incorporated 40,387.98 COP Remarketing Agreement 34852 Southern California Edison 59,484.02 Power 34853 Alrgas Safety 1.224.02 Safety Supplies 34854 Albertson's 6,325.70 Refund Connection Fee 34855 American Airlines 1.920.00 Travel Services 34856 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 2,241.05 Long Distance Telephone Service 34857 AT 8 T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,781.82 Cellular Telephone Service 34858 Battelle 300.00 Laboratory Meeting Registration 34859 Bell Pipe S Supply Co. 352.68 Piping Supplies 3480D Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 34861 Boeing Corporation-Semiconductor 18,386.44 Reconciliation User Fee Program 34862 Court Order 20D.00 Wage Garnishment 34863 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 34864 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2.720.47 Electrical Supplies 34865 CEM Corporation 602.85 Lab Maintenance 34866 CWEA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34887 CWEA-TCP 25.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 34868 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 34869 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 34870 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 34871 Gail Rubio 2.528.63 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34872 Gilbert Ayala 195.00 Connection Fee Refund 34873 Industnal Metal Supply 122.48 Metal 34874 Intl.Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 34675 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 34876 IBM Corporation 1,830.00 Year 2000 Testing 34877 John Wiley 8 Sons.Inc. 433.82 Publication 34878 JohNs Philly Grille 157.11 Planning/Design/Engineering Meeting Expense-J-42 34879 Jonathan Manufacturing Corp. 1,801.90 Reconciliation User Fee Program 34880 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 165.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 34881 League of California Cities 1,000.00 Sponsorship 34882 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 208.85 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 34883 MI Services Group,Inc. 1.500.00 Construction Management Training Registration 34884 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2,490.00 Construction Management Training Registration 34885 NAGDCA 90.00 Human Res.Meeting Registration-Nal'I.Assoc.of Gov.Defined Contribution Adm. 34886 Orange County Marshal 10D.00 Wage Garnishment 34887 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 321.91 Fittings 34888 OCEA 485.87 Dues Deduction 34889 Pacl0c Parts and Controls, Inc. 956.63 Electrical Supplies 34890 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 34891 Parker Hannifin Corporation 342.68 Mechanical Supplies 34892 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 34893 Patriot Video Productions 410.80 Video Taping Services Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34894 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 34895 Project Adventure,Inc. 373.80 Safety&Emergency Response Site Evaluation for Training 34896 Robert F.Driver Assoc., Inc. 2,799.00 Commercial Crime Insurance 34897 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 33.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34898 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment 34899 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3.188.20 Mechanical Supplies 34900 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 34901 University of Southern California 11.87 Publication 34902 Verizon California 733.42 Telephone Services 34903 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 283.54 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 34904 Mike J.Herrera 100.00 Meoling/Training Expense Reimbursement 34905 James C.Mullins 244.79 Reimbursement for Certified Mailings J-33-1 34906 Robert Dolan 762.56 Meeting7rrainirg Expense Reimbursement 34907 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 855.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 34908 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 50.435.53 Engineering Services J-73-2 34909 AKM Consulting Engineers 75,361.52 Engineering Services 7-36,7-39,741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 34910 Black&Veatch Corporation 136,652.94 Engineering Services J-77 34911 Boyle Engineering Corporation 34,356.00 Engineering Services 1.2.4 34912 Camillo Engineers 74.619.99 Engineering Services P2.60&P2-66 34913 City of Santa An 55,992.00 Cooperative Projects Program J-73 34914 Cooper Energy Systems 46.657.50 Repair&Testing of Turbo Charger 34915 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 55,819.07 Misc.Construction Service 2-37&Irrigation Valve Replacement Project 34916 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 27,967.21 Medical Insurance Premium 34917 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 168,405.37 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 34918 Lee&Ro.Inc. 28.055.30 Engineering Consutiing Services 5.49,5-50.5.51,5.52&J47 34919 Mladen Burtich Construction Company 90,000.00 Construction-Emergency Repair W 244nch Force Main 34920 Orange County Water District 108,866.07 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 34921 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 129.207.11 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 34922 Polydyne.Inc. 35,649.13 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 34923 Primary Source 64,197.19 Ofce/Lunch Roan Furniture 34924 Projects Partners 26,363.09 Temporary Employment Services 34925 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 97,654.30 Pumps 34926 Science Applications IMI.,Corp. 245,884.41 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-04 34927 Tran Consulting Engineers 53,655.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 1.17,7.21 &1-2.4 34928 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 87,763.14 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 34929 Western Slates Chemical,Inc. 39,679.28 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95 34930 Ark Construction Company 27,090.00 Construction-Enclose Open Bay at Pit. 1 Warehouse Storage Area 34931 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 110.408.58 Construction 3.38.1 34932 J W Contracting Corporation 254,713.00 Construction P2-60 34933 Margate Construction, Inc. 255,117.00 Construction J-71.2 34934 Southern Contracting Company 29,855.25 Construction P2-47-1 34935 Union Bank of California 28,302.00 Construction,Retention P2-60 34936 A.B,I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 109.03 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 34937 A-Plus Systems 1.442.70 Notices&Ads 34938 AccWtie Fasteners,Inc. 35.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34939 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 3.292.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies a + Page 2 Of 9 Claims Paid From 0410'1101 to 04115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34940 Advanced Technology Service 4,770.25 Ins.Pens&Supplies 34941 Air Cold Supply 45.44 Air Conditioner Supplies 34942 Air Liquids America Corp. 865.38 Specially Gasses 34943 Air Products&Chemicals 6.16 lab Supplies 34944 Airborne Express 125.83 Air Freight 34945 Airgas Safely 3,002.76 Safety Supplies 34946 Alden's Carpet&Drapes 1,801.42 Flooring for Board Secretary's Vault 34947 Beatrice E.Anderson 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34948 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 675.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 34949 Appleone Employment Service 1,176.45 Temporary Employment Services 34950 Aquent,Inc. 4,200.00 Temporary Employment Services 34951 Ark Construction Company 3,450.00 Construction-Floor Concrete Repair 34952 Artistic Blinds 283.00 Mini Blinds&Installa0on 34953 William C. F.Au 483.46 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34954 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 474.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34955 ABB Automation,Inc. 356.76 Instrument Service Malnt. 34956 ASS Group,Inc. 61.00 Publication 34957 American Air Filler International 1,343.75 Filler 34956 ABBE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 870.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration 34959 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 35.69 Telephone Service 34960 AWSI 166.DD Department of Transportation Training Program 34961 Battery Specialties 348.30 Batteries 34962 Dane Binlorn 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34963 BloMerieux Vilek,Inc. 624.59 Lab Supplies 34964 Borthwlck,Guy,Betlenhausen 13,112.29 Professional Services P2-84 34966 Curtis Brandt 483A5 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34966 Curds G.&Karen Brandt 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34967 Brenner-Fledler&Assoc, Inc. 1,006.58 Compressor 34968 Brett F.Sanders,Ph.D 500.00 Professional Services J-85-TAC 34969 Lloyd D.Brumbaugh 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34970 Burke Engineering Co. 985.78 Ins.Pads&Supplies 34971 Cal-Glass,Inc. 262.09 Lab Equipment Service 34972 California Auto Collision 690.52 Fender Repair on V434 34973 California Relocation Services, Inc. 151.88 Office Moving Services 34974 Carolyn Callaway 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34975 Callrol,Inc. 2,998.04 Ins.Parts&Supplies 34976 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 16,548.86 Engineering Services-Sewer Mapping 34977 Mary K.Campbell 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 34978 Capital Westward 219.81 Freight Charges 34979 Carl Warren&Co. 1,314.27 Insurance Claims Administrator 34980 Carollo Engineers 273.00 Engineering Services J-66 34981 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 17,410.23 Engineering Services P2-82 34982 Clayton Controls 105.63 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34983 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 1.472.83 O61ce Supplies 34984 Compressor Components Of California 2.737.49 Compressor Supplies 34985 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 68.22 Computer Malnt.Agreement Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34986 Computers America,Inc. 272.12 Color Printer Cartridge 34987 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 601.39 Electrical Supplies 34988 Continental Laboratory Products.Inc. 3,521.20 Lob Supplies 34989 Converse Consultants 4,991.00 Consulting Service 11-20 34990 Cooper Energy Services 474.65 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 34991 Corporate Express Imaging 421.94 Computer Supplies 34992 Corporate Express 3,863.35 Office Supplies 34993 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899419 34994 Coat Containment Solutions 1,543.37 Worker's Comp.Services 34995 County Wholesale Electric Co. 11,590.56 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 34996 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Son Water Service 34997 Cummins Cal Pacific,Inc. 1,488.19 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 34998 CA Emissions Program 23.40 Vehicle Smog Testing 34999 CA-NV Section,AW WA 225.00 Mechanical Maintenance Meeting Registration 35000 CASA 1,125.00 Administration Meeting Registration 36001 CEM Corporation 957.01 Lob Supplies 35002 CPI-California Pipeline Inspection 3.562.00 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3.38-1 35003 CR 8 R,Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals 35004 CRC Press, Inc. 188.47 Publication 35005 CRO Marine Laboratories,Inc. 792.00 Lab Analysis 35006 Computational Systems,Inc. (CS0 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 35007 Del Mar Analytical 2.070.00 Blosolkls Analysis 35006 DeZunk do Misco/SouthWesl 948.15 Valves 35009 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 597.09 Computer Software/Supplies 35010 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 209.96 Paint Supplies 35011 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,312.00 Surveying Services MO 68-94 35012 ABB Automation,Inc. 3,266.53 Instrument Maml. 35013 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 115.59 Electrical Supplies 35014 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 195.00 Medical Screening 35015 Electra-Bond 994.38 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 35010 Kevin 8 Joan Eisen 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35017 Employment Development Dept. 35.08 Stale Unemployment Tax 35018 Enchanter, Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-2445 35019 Environmental Resource Associates 1.732.70 Lab Supplies 35020 Charlie Evans 458.73 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35021 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. 588.25 Malnl.Service Agreement 35022 FedEx Corporation 389.23 Air Freight 35023 First American Real Estate Solutions 275.00 Orange County Property Information 35024 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,099.61 Lab Supplies 35025 Fleetcommunily,Inc. 100.00 Publication 35026 Flo-Systems,Inc. 5,149.25 Pump Supplies 35027 Forestry Suppliers 248.79 Ins.Parts 8 Supplies 35026 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company 20,279.28 Long-Term Disability Ins,Premium 35029 Fountain Valley Camera 66.37 Photo Supplies 35030 Fountain Valley Regional Hospital 82.62 Emergency Room Services 35n31 Franklin Covey 675.88 Office Supplies Page 4 of 9 a, r Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35032 Fry's Electronics 702.04 Computer Supplies 35033 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 323.71 Bee Filter Press Supplies 35034 WIN Grainger,Inc. 670.58 Electrical Pans&Supplies 35035 Graybar 2,784.32 Computer Software/Hardware Supplies 35036 Hach rJo Penton Industries 3,453.72 Lab Supplies 35037 Ron&Marilyn Harder 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35038 Judith A.Hemphill 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35039 Hcerbiger Service, Inc. 5,646.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 35040 Home Depot 1,194.76 Small Hardware 35041 Jack Hom 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35042 Hub Auto Supply 434R9 Truck Parts 35043 Hunts'Final Phase 1,970.00 Misc.Repairs(Maintenance Services 35044 Hydraulic Controls, Inc. 136,00 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 35045 Impulse 60.75 Repairs&Malnt.Services 35D46 Industrial Distribution Group 3,116.56 Tools&Misc.Supplies 35047 Inteq Group 3,496.50 Information Technology Training Registration 35048 Ionics Instrument Business Group 2,764.89 Lab Supplies 35049 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS1400 Upgrade 35050 Information Management Resources(IMRI) 2,250.00 Professlonal Services-Software Consultant 35051 IONIA,Inc. 238.95 Publication 35052 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 7,583.16 Instrument Supplies 35053 Jay's Catering 1,196.24 Meeting Expenses 35054 John and Susan Millar 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35D55 John's Phllly Grille 504.24 Training Expenses-J-42 35056 FormsTronlesRlchalds Capital Corporation 1,062.50 Business Forms-Checks 35057 Nell W.&Pamela C. Kam 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35D58 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,375.00 FIS Support Services 35059 Kensington Electronics 476.81 Electrical Supplies 35060 Kathleen Kotl 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35061 Dennis Kretschmer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35062 Kronos,Inc. 3,750.00 Timekeeping Software,Training&Maintenance 35063 Lab Support 1,284.00 Temporary Employment Services 35064 William H.Lang 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septc Tanks 35065 La Molls Chemical Products 343.95 Chemicals 35066 Steven D.Lewis 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35067 Gerald R.Jones 5,146.55 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22.99 35068 Luod's 95.00 Meeting Expense 35069 Raymond Maggi 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 36070 Maintenance Technology Corp. 509.15 Mechanical Supplies 35071 Mark R.Mangold 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35072 Michael Manzano 483A5 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35073 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontado Branch 222.33 Plumbing Supplies 35074 McCromeler,Inc. 617.25 Repairs&Maint.Services 35075 Leota H.McGill 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35076 The McGraw-Hill Companies 143.34 Publication 35077 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,493.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35078 Mec Analytical System 2,067.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 35079 Medlin Controls Co. 534.43 Instrument Supplies 35000 Raymond Mew 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35081 Jessie C.Meyers 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35082 Michael's Stores,Inc. 93.46 Office Supplies 35083 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13.595.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35084 Mission Uniform Service 4,864.46 Uniform Rentals 35085 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 35086 Montgomery Watson 13,838.83 Professional Services-2-21-1 35087 Charlene Morley 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35088 National Microcamp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 35089 National Plant Services,Inc. 9,316.50 CCTV Sewer Line Inspection&Vacuum Services 35090 Neal Supply Co. 261.01 Plumbing Supplies 35091 Audrey Needham 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35092 Network Generations,Inc. 7,256.25 Computer So0ware/Hardware 35093 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1,338.02 Security System Maintenance 35094 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 Purchasing Training Registration 35095 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.843.65 Professional Services J-66&3-38-1 35096 Office Depot Business Services Div. 4,076.26 Once Supplies 35097 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 1,877.50 Contract Service -MukiAgency Benchmarking Study 35098 Cason Construction,Inc. 17,527.00 Construction P7-59 35099 OneSm ce Distributors.Inc. 696.61 Electrical Pans&Supplies 35100 Orange County Hose Company 366.53 Hydraulic Hose,Supplies&Repairs 35101 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,412.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 35102 Oxygen Service Company 1,848.27 Specialty Gases 35103 OCB Reprographics 14,992.08 Printing Service-MO 1126100 35104 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 747.23 Electrical Supplies 35105 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 35106 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,647.00 Plumbing Supplies 35107 Pacific Pans&Controls 3,173.57 Electrical Supplies 35108 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 11.52 Freight Charges 35109 Pagenet 2,393.20 Paging Services 35110 Emilia Palacios 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35111 Parker Hannifin Corporation 51.60 Mechanical Supplies 35112 Parts Unlimited 404.75 Truck Supplies 35113 Patriot Video Productions 29.83 Video 35114 Paveway 6,212.00 Asphalt 35115 Peak Technologies 331.05 Lab Supplies 35116 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,237.50 Repairs&Maint.Services 35117 Petroleum Traders Corporation 15.358.04 Gasoline 35118 William B.&Nancy K.Pfeifer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35119 Bradley K.&Patricia A.PreiBer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35120 Pod Supply 396.52 Safety Supplies 35121 Power Electro Supply Co.,Inc. 746.44 Electrical Supplies 35122 Pre-Paid Legal Services.Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 35123 Precision Industries 536.95 Mechanical Supplies Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 04101101 to 04115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35124 Pyramid Fence Company, Inc. 1,904.70 Fencing Installation 35125 PC Connection,Inc. 212.00 Computer Supplies 35126 FIFE Interna8onal,Inc. 24,636.86 Intellitouch Complete Mail Center Manager&Maint. 35127 Quality Building Supply 210.05 Landscaping Supplies 35128 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 35129 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,230.53 Trash Removal 35130 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 499.38 Lab Supplies 35131 Reliestar 8.414.75 Employee Medical Health Premium 35132 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,898.60 Life Insurance Premium 35133 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 243.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35134 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer Dist. 5.000.00 Construction-Manhole Inundation Investigation Cooperative Projects 35135 RJN Group,Inc. 5,387.50 CMMS Consulting Services 35136 Safety Info,Inc. 195.OD Publication 35137 Richard&Nancy Schnell 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35138 Schwirg America,Inc. 201.65 Freight Charges 35139 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 48.76 Specially Gases 35M Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 7,536.00 Ins.Pans&Supplies $5141 Sears Industrial Sales 746.33 Mechanical Supplies 35142 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 11.509.50 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 35143 James Sellers 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35144 Sensotec,Inc. 534.96 Electrical Supplies 35145 Mrs.Doris C.Shelly 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35146 Shureiuck Sales&Engineering 895.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35147 Donald J.Simmons 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35148 . Sloan Electric Company 9,260.89 Generator Repairs 35149 So.Cal.Gas Company 2.003.43 Natural Gas 35150 Soco-Lynch Corp. 802.58 Janitorial Supplies 35151 Southern California Edison 2,344.84 Power 35152 Sperling Inat.C/O Patten Corporate 2.941.21 Electrical Pans&Supplies 35153 Stanley B.Grant,Ph.D 1,000.00 Professional Services J-85 35154 John D.Stephens 1,422.08 Employee Computer Loan Program 35155 Kenneth S1lchler 561.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35156 Sunset Ford 9SA4 Vehicle Supplies 35157 Sunset Industrial Pans 2,036.93 Mechanical Supplies 35158 Super Power Products 387.00 Janitorial Supplies 35159 SCP Science 766.00 Lab Supplies 35160 SKC-West, Inc. 49.00 Safely&Emergency Response Meeting Registration 35161 Team,Inc. 6,256.50 Valves 35162 Telog Instruments,Inc. 44.50 Electrical Pans&Supplies 35163 Tetra Tech, Inc. 4.687.91 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 35164 The Foxboro Company 2,204.75 Instrument Supplies 35165 The Orange County Register 1,122.90 Notices&Ads 35166 ThermoOuest Corporation 18,503.16 Lab Supplies 35167 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 450.00 Biosolids Analysis 35168 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 15,444.71 Mechanical Supplies 35169 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 4,960.00 Elevator Maintenance Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 04101101 to 04115101 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description 35170 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 35171 Daily Pilot 425.00 Notices&Ads 35172 Toshiba International Corporation 4,374.65 Computer-Toshiba 1400 XL 35173 Total Air Analysis, Inc. 400.00 Lab Testing Service 36174 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 263.38 Tragic Safety Equipment Rental 35175 The Trans Company 208.39 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 35176 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 35177 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 467.73 Truck Supplies 35178 Tmesdall Laboratories,Inc. 40.00 Lab Services 35179 TCH Associates,Inc. 557.06 Lab Supplies 35180 Teksystems 3.960.00 Temporary Employment Services 35181 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Lab Service Agreement-Water Purification System 35182 Ultra Scientific 308.60 Lab Supplies 35183 The Unisoume Corporation 5,161.23 Office Supplies 35184 United Asset Coverage,Inc. 20.727.05 Phone System Meint. 35185 United Parcel Service 34,85 Parcel Services 35186 US Rental,Inc. 1.084.26 Dump Truck Rental 35187 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.753.73 Plumbing Supplies 35188 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 27.64 Mechanical Supplies 35189 Edward Van Vital 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35190 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,200.00 Temporary Employment Service 35191 Vapex.Inc. 968.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35192 Mike Varanelli 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35193 Varian Instrument Group 4,143.81 Lab Parts&Supplies 35194 Vedzon California 2,555.42 Telephone Services 35195 Verne's Plumbing 3.632.50 Plumbing Equipment Service 35196 Robert and Tracy Voll 57SA8 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35197 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 14,170.85 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 35198 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,007.83 Lab Supplies 35199 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,133.00 Security Guards 35200 Ronald&Lynne Walaszek 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35201 Water Environment Federation 11.75 Publication 35202 Watson Wyatt Data Services 359.00 Subscription 35203 Wane Sanitary Supply 736,79 Janitorial Supplies 35204 James Webb 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35205 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 125.94 Electrical Supplies 35206 Weslmark Paint Co. 225.90 Painting Supplles $5207 WS Atkins Water 20,000.00 Bbsolids Testing Agreement 35208 Xerox Corporation 3,840.97 Copier Leases 35209 The Yakima Company 12,276.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 35210 Oleeon Construction, Inc. 4,659.00 Construction J-52&Fuzzy Filter Piping Installation 35211 Union Bank of California 5,810.97 Construction 3-38-1,Retention 35212 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 615.86 Meeling77raining Expense Reimbursement 35213 Bruce A.Chapman 783.68 Employee Computer Loan Program 35214 Darrell S. Ennis 250.00 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimbursement 35215 John G.Gonzalez 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35216 Linda Lusurdo 126.30 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 35217 David A.Ludwin 268.27 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 35218 Robert Oaten 371.45 MeelingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 35219 Mark S.Roberts 330.89 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 35220 Wendy T.Sevenandl 669.12 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 35221 Douglas M.Stewart 149.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 35222 Nonnan Eckenrode 525.00 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 35223 Peter M.Green 480.00 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 35224 Orange County Sanitation District 1,882.48 Petty Cash Reimb. 35225 Anna L.Piercy 480.00 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 35226 James W.Silva 480.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,848,563.05 Payroll Disbursements 22727-22865 Employee Paychecks $ 171,242.28 Biweekly Payroll 04/04101 22866-22869 Interim Paychecks 4,892A2 Tuition Reimbursement Adjustments 22870-22870 Interim Paycheck 1,496.05 Lost Check Replacement 59560-60015 Direct Deposit Statements 710,742.57 Biweekly Payroll 0404101 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 888,373.32 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 75,613.16 Society Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 89,518.32 March Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 165,131.48 Total Claims Paid 04/01/01 -04115/O1 $ 4,902,067.85 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 04/16101 to 04/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 35227 BP Energy Company $ 168.746.72 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28 35228 Delta Dental 47,500.85 Dental Insurance Plan 35229 Orange County Sanitation District 445.851,53 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 35230 So.Cal. Gas Company 30.411.96 Natural Gas 35231 State Water Resources Control Board 25,000.00 Environmental Project-Seal Beach Closer 35232 Orange County Sanitation District 27,140.04 Workers Comp. Reimb. 35233 Airgas Safety 215.66 Safely Supplies 35234 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing 29.95 Publication 35235 Applied Blomonitoring 1,080.50 Professional Services J-85-TAC 36236 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 158A 5 Telephone Service 35237 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 35238 Blue Planet Foundation 1,500.D0 Sponsorship-2001 Water Education Festival 35239 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 35240 Burlington Safety Laboratory of CA,Inc. 3,614.79 Electrical Paris&Safety Supplies 35241 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc 1,155.90 Service Agreement 35242 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 35243 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 603.96 Electrical Supplies 35244 Convey Compliance Systems.Inc. 340.00 Software Maint. 35245 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Com ilting Services-EMT Management Training 35246 Costco Wholesale Membership 45.00 Membership 35247 CSMFO-Calif.Society of Mun.Fin.Off. 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 35248 CWEA Membership %00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 35249 Diamond H Recognition 141.17 Employee Service Awards 35250 Endymion Systems,Inc. 1,400.00 Professional Services-Software Installation&Configuration 35251 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 35252 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 35253 Industrial Metal Supply 1.172.41 Metal 35254 Inteq Group 1,295.D0 Source Control Training Registration 35255 Infl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1.345.14 Dues Deduction 35256 ISSA-LA 190.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 35257 J.D.Edwards 420.00 Professional Consulting Services-AS400 35258 Leslie Rosenfeld 1.369.67 Professional Services J-85-TAC 35259 Mandic Motors 35.Do Towing Services 35260 MarVac Electronics 75.82 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35261 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 9,150.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service 35262 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 874.25 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training 35263 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 169.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35264 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 35265 Orange Valve&Fi0ing Company 496.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 35266 OCEA 485.87 Dues Deduction 35267 Pacific Bell 1.077.36 Telephone Services 35268 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 35269 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 35270 Patriot Video Productions 29.95 Video 35271 Peace Officers Council of CA 882.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From D4116101 to 04130101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35272 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 112.33 Specialty Gases 35273 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,005.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35274 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 35275 SodChdce 1,993.38 Software 35276 South Coast Water 460.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 35277 Southern California Edison 7,003.11 Power 35278 State Board of Equalization 767.30 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 35279 Summit Steel 254.66 Metal 35280 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 806.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35281 The Unisource Corporation 2,105.57 Office Supplies 35282 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 35283 Veritect 2,025.50 Software Maint. 35284 Venzon California 1,043.29 Telephone Services 35285 Vertex,Inc. 941.70 Software Maint. 35286 Bradley H.Cagle 1.145.00 Mcetingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 35287 Jan E.Collins 133.40 Meetingfhaining Expense Reimbursement 35288 Martin G.England 1,074.52 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 35289 James W.Made 828.48 Meeting/freining Expense Reimbursement 35290 Simon L.Watson 562A6 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 35291 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 35292 American Express 41,469.07 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 35293 RPI/Bio Gro 46,850.81 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 35294 Black&Veatch Corporation 286,298.13 Engineering Services P146-2.P7-76&J-71-3 35295 Blue Cross of California 186,776.81 Medical Insurance Premium 35296 Brown&Caldwell 731,942.51 Engineering Services 2.41 35297 BP Energy Company 187.314.59 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28 35298 Computerized Facility Intergmlion 232.484.83 Engineering Service J-25-1 35299 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 39,923.97 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 35300 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 184,909.63 Engineering Services J-35-2 35301 Projects Partners 70,624.88 Temporary Employment Services 35302 Voided Check - - 35303 Southern California Edison 120.280.85 Power 35304 Team,Inc. 28,671.33 Valves 35305 Tran Consulting Engineers 61.994.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 1-17.1-2-4 If 7-21 35306 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 107.835.35 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 35307 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 47,990.01 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No.C-044 35308 Voided Check - - 35309 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smarr 58,854.66 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 35310 Ken Thompson, Inc. 224.426.51 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 35311 A-Plus Systems 1,445.00 Notices&Ads 35312 Accutfe Fasteners,Inc. 34.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35313 AccuStendard,Inc. 373.45 Lab Supplies 35314 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Air Conditioning Service 35315 Agllent Technologies,Inc. 273.06 Lab Parts&Supplies 35316 Air Liquids America Corp. 1.843.78 Specialty Gasses 35317 Airborne Express 262.71 Air Freight 0 Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From D4116/01 to 04130101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35318 Airgas Safety 54.31 Safely Supplies 35319 Mob Products,Inc. 457.11 Janitorial Supplies 35320 David Aldddge 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35321 American Management Association 1,595.00 Construction Management Training Registration 35322 Anderson GreernvcodIVarec 929.88 Repairs&Maintenance Service 35323 Anixler,Inc. 38.97 Electrical Supplies 35324 Appleone Employment Service 6,309.36 Temporary Employment Services 35325 Aquent,Inc. 8,456.25 Temporary Employment Services 35326 Arms Data Security 204.00 OOsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 35327 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste Oil Removal 35328 Awards&Trophies By Bea 112.40 Plaques 35329 ABB Automation, Inc. 3,652.94 Inst. Repairs&Malnt.Service 35330 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 385.03 Telephone Service 35331 AT&T 228.70 Telephone Service 35332 Battery Specialties 783.29 Batteries 35333 BloMerleux Vllek, Inc. 1,0D0A2 Lab Parts&Supplies 35334 Bela Biresak 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35335 Bonhwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 9,142.65 Professional Services P2-84 35336 Bush&Associates,Inc. 8,476.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 35337 California Auto Collision 2,344.17 Vehicle Repairs 35338 Callrol,Inc. 365.82 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 35339 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 6,000.00 Engineering Services J-71-1 &J-71-2 35340 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.108.20 Instrument Parts 35341 Rose Drive Friends Church 78.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35342 Computers America, Inc. 88.61 Computer Supplies 35343 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3.237.31 Electrical Supplies 35344 Corporate Express 261.79 Office Supplies 35345 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 35346 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 70.00 Main.Agreement-Repaidinstallation of Base, Handheld&Vehicle Radios 35347 County of Orange,Auditor Controller 6.426.00 Underground Tank Program 35348 County Wholesale Electric Co. 730.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35349 Kenneth Cox 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35350 Crane America Services,Inc. 2,475A4 Crane Services 35351 Cummins Allison Corp. 966.99 Accounting Equipment Maim.Agreement 35352 Cydus Envirosystems,Inc. 3,441.10 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 35353 Cylec Industries 14,121.00 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 35354 CA Emissions Program 13.50 Vehicle Smog Testing 35355 CALPERLA 195.00 Membership-California Public Employers Labor Relations Association 35356 CWEA 100.00 Notices&Ads-California Water Env,Assoc. 35357 Del Mar Analytical 18.00 Blosolids Analysis 35358 Diamond H Recognition 1,037A7 Employee Service Awards 35359 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 884A7 Paint Supplies 35360 Dwyer Instruments,Inc. 446.56 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35361 DOB Engineering,Inc. 12,720.00 Temporary Employment Services 35362 DME,Inc. 2,406.69 Compressor Pans 35363 E.Sam Jones Distributom,Inc. 433.45 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 04116/01 to 04/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35364 Easi File Corporation 2.176.57 File Cabinets 35365 Enchanter,Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 35366 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,355.15 Lab Supplies 35367 DeVere C.Erb 863.20 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35368 EDSG:Environmental Data Solutions Group 5,200.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project 35369 ENS Resouces, Inc. 8,096.73 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 35370 K.Faulk 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35371 K.Faulk 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35372 FedEx Corporation 78.47 Air Freight 35373 FileNET Corporation 2,600.00 Information Technology Training Registration 35374 Filter Supply Company 2,808.44 Filters 35375 First American Real Estate Solutions 648.15 Orange County Property Information 35376 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.Q. 1,598.93 Lab Supplies 35377 Fountain Valley Camera 42.42 Photo Supplies 35378 William Fox 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35379 Stacey Frank 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35380 Franklin Covey 101.02 Office Supplies 35381 Frederick Pump&Engineering 2.675.94 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 35382 Marcela Freud 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35383 Ganahl Lumber Company 171.14 Lumber/Hardware 35384 Gelinge Castle 417.33 Lab Supplies 35385 WIN Grainger, Inc. 481.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35386 Graybar 1.185.71 Electrical Supplies 35W7 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 1,669.16 Vehicle Repairs-V-163 35368 Nicholas or Heather Green 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35389 Kate Gulewich 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35390 GVD Commercial Properties 4,957.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 35391 Hach Go Ponton Industries 9,448.69 Pump&Pump Supplies 35392 Pam Hales 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35393 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 122.00 Meeting Expenses 35394 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,419.00 Misc.Office Furniture 35395 HIM,Inc. 4,689.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35396 J.Holdren 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35397 The Holman Group 698.64 Employee Assistance Program Premium 35398 Home Depot 242.96 Small Hardware 35399 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 5,833.29 Software Maint. 35400 Paul Hunter 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35401 City of Huntington Beach 57.27 Water Use 35402 Hasco Oil Co.,Inc. 52.79 Lube Oil 35403 Brian Ignatowski 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35404 Imaging Plus,Inc. 9.00 Printing Service 35405 Industrial Distribution Group 1,246.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35406 Information Resources 135.00 Human Resources Service 35407 Integra Biosciences,Inc. 1,663.09 Lab Supplies 35408 Irvine Ranch Water District 55.78 Water Use 35409 IBM Corp. 6,064.45 IBM AS1400 Lease Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 04116101 to 04/30101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35410 Jamison Engineering Contractonl Inc. 19,380.00 Misc.Construction Services-Foster Pump Station&Yorba Linda Sawer Line 35411 Jay's Catering 352.61 Meeting Expenses 35412 John's Philly Grille 396.27 Meeting Expenses Pl-37 Workshop 35413 CSC Parts Sales/Johnson Controls,Inc. 115,57 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35414 Johnstone Supply 119.01 Electrical Supplies 35415 Karen Monaco&Associates 5,937.50 FIS Support Services 35416 Kelly Paper 665.40 Paper 35417 Joel Kimcher 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35418 Sergio Klotz 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35419 Christine Koud 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35420 Lab Support 1,966.13 Temporary Employment Services 35421 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 2,004.15 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 35422 Le Molls Chemical Products 1,662.44 Chemicals 35423 LeAs-Nexis 28.90 Books&Publications 35424 Liebert Cassidy 595.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 35425 Lillick&Charles,L.L.P. 2.000.00 Professional Service-1993 Series Investments 35426 Gerald R.Jones 6,027.38 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 35427 Lucers 66.50 Meeting Expense 35428 Gary or Clara Madison 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35429 W. Maier 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35430 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 494.80 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 35431 McMurray-Stern 12,386.11 Misc.Off"Furniture-Spacesaver Shelving System 35432 Mac Analytical System 11,981.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 35433 Media Clips, Inc. 175.00 Notices 35434 Medlin Controls Co. 107.07 Lab Supplies 35435 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 6,308.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 35436 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 9,341.24 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 35437 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 129.81 Safely Glass 35438 Mission Uniform Service 2,150.26 Uniform Rentals 35439 Motorola Communications&Electronics 15,529.66 Communication Equipment 35440 MmoPlotc 64.50 Photographic Services 35441 MAP 1.500.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs 35442 MCR Technologies, Inc. 712.84 Chart Paper 35443 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,520.00 Vacuum Truck Services 35444 Neal Supply Co. 546.74 Plumbing Supplies 35445 NeWersant of Southern California 4,072.95 Information Technology Training Registration 35446 City of Newport Beach 11.37 Water Use 35447 NewBasis 188.25 Building Supplies 35448 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.279.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 35449 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mall Delivery Service 35450 Emest Ochotorena 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35461 Office Depot Business Services Div. 359.46 Office Supplies 35452 Andres Olowskl 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35453 OneSouroe Distributors.Inc. 70.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35454 Orange County Water District 471.17 Hotel-Motel Water Efficiency Program 35455 Orange County Wimvater Works 278.53 Plumbing Parts&Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 04/16/01 to 04/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35456 Orange Valve&Filling Company 106.34 Fittings 35457 Oct'¢Fire Protection 362.00 Service Agreement 35458 Oxygen Service Company 2,725.91 Specialty Gases 35459 OCB Repmgmphics 10,047.50 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 35460 Pacific Bell 56.14 Telephone Services 35461 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,031.14 Plumbing Supplies 35462 Pagera:t 2,440.66 Paging Services 35463 Emilia Palacios 630.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35464 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 190.60 Mechanical Supplies 35465 Parker Supply Company 671.14 Chemicals 35466 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 3,977.23 Tires 35467 Patriot Video Productions 446.59 Video 35468 Peed Art&Craft 108.01 Office Supplies 35469 SynaBro West,Inc. 24.134.99 Residuals Removal MID 3.20-95 35470 Polydyne,Inc. 24,812.98 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 35471 Cambridge Integrated Service 6.250.00 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 35472 Primary Source 14,471.25 Office Furniture 35473 Protech Petroleum Services.Inc. 604.69 Repairs&Maint.Service 35474 Pumping Solulkis,Inc. 3.568.40 Mechanical Supplies 35475 PCS Express 40.35 Courier Service 35476 PFE International,Inc. 3,616.80 Maintenance Agreement 35477 R.T.Engineering 744.68 Electrical Paris&Supplies 35478 Revco Technologies 107.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35479 Mack&Unda Rica 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35480 Timothy Robertson 83D.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35481 Steven Robinson 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35482 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 5,498.04 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 35483 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 2,700.00 Engineering Services-P2 Clarifier Walkway-Pladorm Strengthening 35484 RPM Electric Motors 4,219.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 35485 Santa Fe Bag Co.,Inc. 92.27 Bag Supplies 35486 J.Kidand Scarborough 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35487 Seam Industrial Sales 96.63 Mechanical Supplies 35488 Shamrock Supply CO.,Inc. 401.70 Mechanical Supplies 35489 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 22,025.00 Professional Services 2.41 35490 So.Cal.Gas Company 4,824.79 Natural Gas 35491 SoftChoice 424.95 Software 35492 Southern California Edison 24.81 Power 35493 Sparklarth, 4,147.15 Drinking Water/Coder Rentals 35494 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 58.54 OBse Supplies 35495 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 35496 Sunset Industral Pads 743.57 Mechanical Supplies 35497 Super Max Mexican Restaurants 1,607.13 Open House 35498 SAWPA-Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 6.000.00 Professional Services-Sieman,Larsen&Marsh 35499 SKC-West,Inc. 513.37 Meter 35500 SPEC Services.Inc. 1,572.92 Engineering Services J-33-1 35501 Techpro Sal"&Service,Inc. 297.92 Repairs&Maintenance-Mechanical Seal on High Rate Mixer Pump Page 6of8 - Claims Paid From 04116/01 to 04/30/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35502 Tekdraulic5,Inc. 1.547.41 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 35503 The Merdwood Corporation 5,660.00 Professional Services-Biosdids Land Inspection 35504 Thermo Optek Corporation 81.85 Lab Equipment 35505 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 484.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 35506 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.D0 Elevator Maintenance 35507 Tierra Tractor 1,800.00 Construction-Regrading Manhole Areas 35508 Tom/§Lock&Safe Service&Sales 237.34 Locks&Keys 35509 Total Safety,Inc. 3.639.42 Safety Supplies 35510 The Trade Company 2,945.00 Repairs&Maintenance-Pit. 1 Cen-Gen Absorber Chiller 35511 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 9.28 Truck Supplies 35512 Troesdail Laboratories, Inc. 193.00 Lab Services 35513 Teksystems 12,630.00 Temporary Employment Services 35514 TRW EMC/Cakbralion Services 1.283.00 Lab Repairs&Maintenance 35515 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 35516 Union Bank of California 1,144.92 Banking Services 35517 United Parcel Service 878.57 Parcel Services 35518 Unocal 76 190.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1 Inspection 35519 Valley Cities Supply Company 226.67 Plumbing Supplies 35520 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 122.30 Mechanical Supplies 35521 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10,400.00 Temporary Employment Service 35522 Verlmn California 3,082.94 Telephone Services 35523 Verne's Plumbing 1,006.80 Plumbing Equipment Service 35524 John C.Vlerra 663.30 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35525 Village Nurseries 87.03 Landscaping Supplies 35526 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,558.00 Door Repair 35527 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 16,551.12 Lab Pads&Supplies 35528 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,020.56 Security Guards 35529 Waxa Sanitary Supply 461.63 Janitorial Supplies 35630 Wellness Councils of America 287.50 Wellness Brochures 35531 West Coast Rotor 1.596.64 Mechanical Supplies 35532 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 94.46 Repairs&Maintenance-CCTV Camera Lens 35533 While Cap Industries 38.24 Painting Supplies 35534 Richard Wolfinger 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 35535 Xerox Corporation 4.884.28 Cooler Leases 35536 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 197.85 Specialty Paper 35537 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 13,072.00 Construction J-63 35538 Union Bank of California 24,936.27 Construction 11-20.Retention 35539 Use M.Lawson 364.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 35540 Dong J.Min 848.25 MeeBngTTmIning Expense Reimbursement 35541 Michael D. Moore 186.35 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 35542 Simon L.Watson 477.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 35543 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,040.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 35544 Employee Activity Committee 500.00 Service Award Expense 35545 John Mirkovich and Dell Computer Corp. 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 35546 Orange County Sanitation District 1,272.71 Petty Cash Reimb. Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 04116101 to 04130101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35547 R.W.Beck 54,233.18 Professional Services PI.66 35548 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Professional Savlces-Tula Ranch Biosolids Management Project Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,118,262.95 Payroll Disbursements 22871-22984 Employee Paychecks $ 170,397.08 Biweekly Payroll 04/18/01 22985.22986 Interim Paychecks 1,380.63 Payroll Adjustment 8 Check Reissue 60016-60466 Direct Deposit Statements 738,476.22 Biweekly Payroll 04/18/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 910,253.93 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 428,102.43 April Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 428.102.43 Total Claims Paid 04/16/01 -04130101 $ 5,456,619.31 Page 8 of 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date 7g /23/01 5d.of AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 10(a) _ Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Mike White, Risk Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS RE EMINENT DOMAIN ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, ET AL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, City of Los Alamitos, a charter city v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CCO2192, in connection with eminent domain of the public road project commonly known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement Project" in the City of Los Alamitos; and 2) authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo from General Counsel. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel. GGS:MW:BG \Voobalaroad alaragendalBoatd ABenOa Rewrls@00I Board Agenda ReMMSWWI%dem 10(a)dw %—d'. Wp0 . Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: May 15, 2001 RE: Eminent Domain Proceedings—Summons and Complaint City of Los Alamitos v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CCO2192 The above-referenced matter of litigation was served on the District on May 3, 2001. The City of Los Alamitos has filed this condemnation proceeding to acquire real property for the public roads project known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement Project", which will allow the City to widen Katella Avenue. The District has been named as a party to the proceeding apparently because of its sewer line facilities in the vicinity. The District's Engineering Department will be making contact with the City of Los Alamitos to ascertain exactly what, if any, impacts this acquisition, and more notably the construction, would have on any District facilities. If in fad the District is to incur any expense, or suffer adverse consequences as a result of the acquisition, we would then immediately endeavor to negotiate the fair compensation from the City for any costs incurred. If, on the other hand, the District is not to be adversely impacted, there should be no significant participation required by the District in the proceedings. It is recommended that the Office of General Counsel appear and defend, as necessary, the interests of the District with respect to this litigation, and to coordinate any work effort that may be undertaken at that location with the District's Staff. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pI cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Mr. D.A. Ludwin Mr. M. White .OS ALAMITOS yl, DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, April 25, 2001 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at 5 p.m., in the Distrieft Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Don Hughes Peter Green, Vice Chair Director Russell Patterson, Guest Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Mark Reid Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services None Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General Manager Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Lisa Arosteguy, Human Resources Analyst Tom Flanagan, Project Specialist Jon Thomsic, SPMT PBECC Committee Member Mark Esquer, SPMT PBECC Committee Member Jim Colston, SPMT PBECC Committee Member Sonja Wassgren, Communications Analyst Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING ' The minutes of the March 28, 2001 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 April 25, 2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode polled the committee on the new agenda format. Jean Tappan indicated that the booklet was considered because it is much easier to produce with less labor. The consensus was to continue using the booklet format for the Steering Committee agenda. It will be trialed by the OMTS and FAHR Committees at their next meetings. Chair Eckenrode announced that he would be inviting the new directors to attend future Steering Committee meetings as follows: May 23, Director Beth Krom;June 27, Director Tony Kawashima; July 18, Director Alice Jempsa;August 22, Director Tod Ridgeway; and September 26, Director Roy Moore. A. Addition of Assistant General Manager Position to FY 2001-02 Budget. The concern expressed by the directors was leadership in the event the general manager is unavailable. General Manager Anderson Indicated that Gary Streed acts as GM in Anderson's absence. He also indicated that the department heads are essentially in an Assistant GM capacity in that they are able to act with considerable autonomy with respect to their areas of responsibility. It was decided to not include this position in next years budget but that the Issue of succession planning will be addressed by the general manager. B. It was decided that the general manager will provide a memo to the Steering Committee members outlining his accomplishments and performance over the Iasi year. The Committee will take it under consideration at its June meeting and make final recommendations to the Board. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. Leadership Training Update B. SPMT PBECC Update C. SPMT Upcoming Negotiations The general manager tied these three items together because they are inter-related. Tom Flanagan and Lisa Arosteguy updated the committee on the District-Chapman University LEAD program and the goals, as well as feedback from participants to date. The general manager and Mark Reid discussed the PBECC process and the successes to date. Greg Mathews and Jim Colston provided an overview of accomplishments over the past few months in attempting to change the culture to a performance-based organization and to bring the compensation and performance systems into alignment. Another presentation will be made to the FAHR Committee. Lisa Tomko indicated that the SPMT Group's contract will expire on June 30, 2001. It was discussed that the April FAHR Committee Interviewed three firms for providing professional negotiation support to management for the upcoming SPMT negotiations. Mr. Steve Filarsky was chosen. Chair Eckenrode, Mr. Anderson and Mrs. Tomko will be meetng with Mr. Filarsky on Thursday,April 26, 2001. A negotiations calendar is being developed. Mr.Anderson indicated that the goal is to maintain coherence and consistency in the negotiating process with the other programs and values of the District and to continue with the same tone that has been successful in recent contracts. V Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 April 25,2001 The Steering Committee asked for updates as deemed necessary by staff, including special meetings K required. D. Ocean Discharge Update (discussed below under E.) E. Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No.J-85 Bob Ghirelli reported that the final action plan for the investigation received overall consensus from the TAC. Six studies will be conducted beginning in May and ending in September. The results from the studies will be used to make a decision on next steps. The budget is now estimated at$2.6 million, an increase of$1.6 million from the original budget. Staff continues to look for additional external funding sources. Staff is also coordinating our studies with other agencies and organizations studies to avoid duplication. EPA and the Regional Board have agreed to reduce the routine summer monitoring required in our NPDES permit. There will be six 48-hour surveys conducted,which will require 150 people round-the-clock. The results could Impact the level of treatment on our effluent. Mr. Ghirelli reported that the plan to reduce the amount of secondary to the ouffall as detailed in the Strategic Plan is on hold until these results of the summer studies are known. There is a question on whether to re-think the Strategic Plan recommendation and prepare an addendum. Staff is working on establishing estimated costs of full secondary treatment. The application for our NPDES permit is due in December 2002. The studies results will frame what the application will look like. Scott Baugh, the Districts legislative consultant, has suggested a public opinion poll to establish a benchmark and begin to understand the expectations of the public. The Steering Committee members agreed to a poll, using a base of 1500. F. County-wide Visioning/Leadership Retreat for Electeds Mr. Anderson reported on meetings that he attended with other agencylorganization leaders and their consideration of a retreat for a county-wide retreat to help develop alliances and shared vision between them. The Steering Committee members agreed that discussions should continue. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that a closed session would not be required. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-B) A. Committee Meetings It was agreed that this discussion would be held over to May. B. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in May. There were no changes requested. m Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 April 25, 2001 (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May 23, 2001 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for May 23, 2001 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. ubmitted by, G a_> e n Tappan Bring Committee Secretary cwy mawMe uxnnre CmvnIDNglWyMiM sCWWa w, i MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2001 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 2, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services James M. Ferryman,Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Don Bankhead Mike Moore, ECM Manager Tony Kawashima Fred O'Brien, ECM Scientist Anna Piercy George Robertson, ECM Senior Scientist Jim Hams, Project Manager Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Mark A. Murphy Paul Walker (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the April 4, 2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance ' and Technical Services Committee Page 2 May 2, 2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair reported that Terri (Josway) Roberts, Safely Manager,who has been instrumental in putting together the District's safety program, is leaving the District and will be the safety manager at Mission Energy, a subsidiary of Edison. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, updated the Directors on the SARI Line Relocation Project. She stated staff was currently reviewing the alternatives contained in the EIR approved for this project. Meetings were also being held with the City of Yorba Linda and those citizens affected by the proposed project. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of Technical Services, advised the Directors the online timekeeping system project will be cancelled with the current vendor. Steps were underway to seek reimbursement from the vendor for the project. Mr. Miles also reported on recent thefts of laptop computers and other materials, of which the thefts were tracked down to a contracted vendor employee who confessed to the thefts. Staff was hopeful that the stolen materials would be recovered. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, stated that staff was able to lock in natural gas at$7.70. The current market price is $15. He advised that both plants have sufficient energy to power the treatment systems and the District has emergency generators. Mr. Dolan reported that the compressed natural gas pumps have been pumping approximately 20% extra gas, and staff has been miscalculating how much profit the District has made. Plans are underway to ensure the gas pumps are calibrated more frequently. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, recognized Mike Moore, ECM Manager, who reported that the National Academy of Sciences has started reviewing the federal regulations on the management of biosolids. They recently met in Washington, DC to receive testimony from a number of experts. There will also be a meeting in June. Staff is convening a panel of experts to testify at that meeting, Mr. Moore also reported that negotiations are underway with Kings County to allow consideration of other types of processes to be included in the ordinance they recently adopted which only allows Class A compost after February 2006. Mr. Ghirelli then gave a brief update on ocean discharge issues, and stated staff was focusing on four categories: science, technology and financing, regulations and permits, and communications/public outreach. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 May 2, 2001 Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, advised she would be attending all committee meetings through the summer due to the ocean discharge issues. She reported that a public opinion research via a telephone survey would be conducted, which would assist in the education to be included in the communication outreach. She also requested Directors to advise staff if they know of any group that might be interested in Teaming about ocean discharge issues. Bob Ghirelll then gave an update on current legislative issues. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTSOI-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Karen Monaco and Associates to provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial Information System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one year period effective July 1, 2001,with option to renew for one year. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS01-19 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to issue a sole source purchase order to DigiTerra Inc. for the purchase of an IBM AS400 Model 820 (Specification No. E-2001-44BD) in support of the District's Financial Information System,for an amount not to exceed $400,000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance and applicable taxes. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, requested the motion be modified to delete the sole source purchase to DlgTerra. Staff has recently been informed that other vendors could provide the same equipment for possibly a lower cost. Directors entered into discussion regarding sole-source contracts, competitive bidding process, and capital expenditures. The motion was then amended to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Purchase of an IBM AS400 Model$20 (Specification No. E-2001-448D) in support of the District's Financial Information System, for an amount not to exceed $400,000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance and applicable taxes, contingent upon advice of General Counsel, in conjunction with the Purchasing Manager, with respect to the appropriate method of obtaining the best price for the purchase. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance tiy: and Technical Services Committee Page 4 May 2, 2001 C. OMTS01-20 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with SeaVisual Consulting, Inc. for services to analyze, interpret and report current meter data, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $129,884, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods; and (2)authorize the General Manager to conduct sale source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for services to evaluate the effects to the coastal marine environment of the discharge of treated wastewater effluent, for an additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. OMTS01-21 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)authorize the General Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000 from the FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary design and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and (2)approve in concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for FY 2001-2002. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. e. OMTS01-22 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1) approve a budget amendment of$1,575.000 for laboratory and miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III,Job No. J-85, for a total project budget of $2,575.000; and (2) authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts, Including those in excess of$100,000,with government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those contracts, in connection with the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85,without further Board action required. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, requested the action be amended to reflect an additional $350,000 to the overall project budget to cover the estimated cost of studies with the AES Power Plant in Huntington Beach. AES will not commit to these monies until they have been granted their permit to operate. However, if AES was able to supply v Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 May 2, 2001 the funds, he assured the committee that the $350,000 would not be spent. The motion was then amended to: (1) Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES Power Plant portion of studies, for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85, for a total project budget of$2,925,000; (2)authorize staff to seek reimbursement from AES Power Plant for$350,000; (3)authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts, including those in excess of $100,000, with government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those contracts; and (4) pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies relating to said project would be made available by the District. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for June 6, 2001 at 5 p.m. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 6 May 2, 2001 (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. Kt Operations, Maintenance tad Technical Services Committee Secretary GA .dtatagendatOMTSt20g1t2001 OMTS Minutest050201 minutes.dw OMTSCOMMITTEE Meeting Date TotoIDir. B/@/ot 05/z3/ol AGENDA REPORT Item Numoer Item Numt OMT5o1-IB 13(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick B. Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Robert Thistle, Information Technology SUBJECT: Financial Information System Technical Support GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a sole source Consultant Service Agreement with Karen Monaco and Associates to provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial Information System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one-year period effective July 1, 2001, with an option to renew for one year. SUMMARY The current JDEdwards Financial Information System provides an integrated system for the input, processing and tracking of financial data. The system is used District-wide to provide processes such as: Financial Reporting, Employee Payroll, Requisitioning, Purchasing, Warehouse Management, Human Resources, Budgeting etc. The Information Technology Department has made the strategic decision to outsource the on-going maintenance effort of the current version of the JDEdwards Financial Information System. The goal is to concentrate in-house resources on learning the new version and upgrading the current JDEdwards World software to the more open systems version called OneWorld Xe. Once the upgrade is complete, the skill set needed to support the legacy World software will not be needed. Since June of 2000, Karen Monaco and Associates has been contracted to provide technical support for the current version of the JDEdwards Financial Information System. These services have been provided on a three days per week schedule as required. Total amount paid will be approximately$150,000 for the period June 2000 through July 2001. Our current JD Edwards technical support contract with Karen Monaco & Associates expires as of June 30, 2001. The District's current Financial Information System will continue to require three days per week of directed technical support for the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. In order to provide continued technical support for the District's Finance Information System, staff request that the consulting services provided by Karen Monaco and Associates be continued for a twelve-month period starting in July of 2001. Gax90b1a0anEa\BWN pgarAa Repw1z�01 BearC RpenEa Repg6\9501\Ilvmfa�c).Manero.Occ ReweE: eawne Page 1 .' PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff is recommending utilizing the consultant services for a 12-month period as follows: Hours/Week Rate Not to Exceed No. of Weeks Total 24 $140.00 52 $174,720 Contingency @ 10% $17,472 Total NTE $192,192 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Duties Duties consist of on site advanced JDE assistance and include additional tasks and responsibilities as directed by the Information technology staff. Examples of task are as follows: JD Edwards Software Tasks • Minor programming customization of modules per District specifications or as directed from manufacturer. Cumulative upgrade of World and One World software as needed. • Assist in production of year-end and Quarterly required Financial Reporting. • Assist in testing software in a development environment, and migrate upgraded software into production environment. • Create reports for users as needed using World Writer or modifying canned Dream Writers per user specifications. • Provide assistance with development of alternative reporting methods (Business Objects/ Oracle, etc.) • Provide technical knowledge in development of alternative reporting solutions for end users. • Assist users in becoming familiarwith functions within World and One World. • As directed, modify business unit security and account number access for requisition entry. • Provide Help Desk support with all aspects pertaining to the AS400, JD Edwards software, and third party software on the AS400 as they relate to JD Edwards. • Software support— PTF installation, O/S support, maintenance, upgrades. • Software support, maintenance, administration —DBU software. G>.m a.odd QOI B.aId n,nda Moaaco d e a.„�: wMa Page 2 • Troubleshoot any problems with the JD Edwards software. • Provide technical expertise on file details and application processes 1 ALTERNATIVES Formally bid for these services. This could potentially cost more based on other quotes received for similar services. Additionally, effective time would be lost bringing this person "up to speed" on the District's Financial Information System needs. Lastly, flexibility to respond to needs as they arise might be jeopardized. Hire a full-time employee and train them to the equivalent level of knowledge and experience. To acquire equivalent skills and abilities would require years of hands on training and experience. There is a risk of losing this individual once training is complete. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS G:1WENNpendalO .A .Repat5WOI0 19 A'.MeReparls10501111em 13(c).Wp ...d¢ ftNYd: a=. Page 3 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date Bd.oroa. OSIO2101 o5123101 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numtier GMTSOI-19 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Richard Castillon, Manager Customer& Network Support SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF IBM AS400 SERVER GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Purchase of an IBM AS400 Model 820 (Specification No. E-2001-44BD) in support of the District's Financial Information System, for an amount not to exceed $400.000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance and applicable taxes. The purchase to be made by soliciting sealed bids from authorized IBM dealers. SUMMARY: The District is currently leasing an IBM AS400 Model S20. This lease will expire June 30, 2001. The AS400 is required to operate the JDEdwards Financial Information System (FIS) application. The current hardware and operating system technology is at the end of its technological life and will not meet the District's future needs. Staff recommends that the General Manager, or his designee, as authorized by Delegation of Authority Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, purchase an AS400 Model 820 for the following reasons: 1. In 1998, staff leased an IBM AS400 Model S20 in support of the FIS System. The District is currently using nearly all of the disk and processor capacity on this system. The new AS400 Model 820 will provide the needed capacity to effectively support FIS for the next three years. The District will be gaining approximately 100 percent processor speed and approximately 400 percent disk capacity to keep up with growing demands. 2. The District is required to upgrade the operating system for the AS400 to the most current version since IBM no longer supports the operating system currently installed on the model S20. The operating system upgrade is required in order for IBM to support the software and hardware. 3. Leasing the AS400 820 would be more costly to the District. If the hardware were leased, the cost would include an additional $20,000 in finance charges. 4. International Business Machines has promptly maintained and provided support to the District for the FIS since 1996. JDEdwards, the FIS vendor, is partnered with IBM. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY: N/A GSwp.dWagendalBoard Agenda Repoda@001 Board Agenda Reports=01 Vtem 13(d)IBM A5400.doc namne:VIM Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (CIP SP-64 Financial Information System Upgrade) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted as a lease, but operating funds exist. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Contact Rich Castillon at: (714) 593-7283 or e-mail at: Castillon@ocsd.com ALTERNATIVES: Lease at same cost plus finance charges. CEQA FINDINGS: N/A ATTACHMENTS: G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda ReportsUO01 Board Agenda Reports10501\Item 13(d)IBM A5400.doc Remsed:a11=0 Page 2 M OMTS COMMITTEE M.,2,200e1 %'I V21 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ikm Number OMTSa1-20 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: George Robertson, Senior Scientist, ECM SUBJECT: SOLE SOURCE OCEAN MONITORING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORT CONTRACTS FOR SEAVISUAL CONSULTING, INC. AND TETRA TECH, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with SeaVisual Consulting, Inc. for services to analyze, interpret and report current meter data, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $129,884, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for services to evaluate the effects to the coastal marine environment of the discharge of treated wastewater effluent, for an additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods SUMMARY The District has in-sourced most elements of its required ocean monitoring program. However, there is a need to continue to have external high-level professional support in the analysis, interpretation and reporting of complex physical, chemical and biological oceanographic data. In particular, this type of consulting support is needed when integrating the three ocean monitoring program components (Core, Strategic Process Studies, and Regional). In 1999, the District entered into two agreements with consulting firms to (1) analyze, interpret, and report current data obtained by District staff and (2) to provide high level review of ocean monitoring results and provide recommendations for future monitoring work. Task 1 has been done by SeaVisual Consulting, Inc. (SeaVisual), and Task 2 has been done by Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). Staff has concluded that both of these support activities are still required, especially as we develop our ocean discharge permit reapplication that is due in December 2002. Both SeaVisual and Tetra Tech have completed their respective tasks to the satisfaction of District's ocean monitoring staff, and staff has recommended continuing with both companies through at least June 30, 2002 with three one-year contract renewal options. e1xyGlatceenGlBwrd n d.ftWa v l ewrd Apmde Reroneww+uW.t%.)dx R Wi 4WI (en)4-1act(m ) Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY SeaVisual Consulting, Inc.: Increase existing contract amount of$99,844 by an additional $30,000 for a total amount not to exceed $129,844. TetraTech, Inc: Increase existing contract amount of$91,000 by an additional $95,000 for a total amount not to exceed $186,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 101) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION At the present time, the District has a resource limitation in the number and expertise of available ocean monitoring staff to analyze all of the data generated by the ocean monitoring program. For the time being, management has decided to rely on external consulting support for these services. ALTERNATIVES 1)Allow contracts to expire and not renew. 2) Send contracts out for competitive bids. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS None. c',.d..I-d., .rd A.-.R.pon.¢om Boom n1md Reoddaosonuon,13W me R—.. I..' 1» 14IMI( 1 Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE M0520soate roea.o oo-. OS-02-01 05-23-01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMrS 01-21 13 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Fred O'Brien, Scientist, ECM SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF OCEAN MONITORING VESSEL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize the General Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000 from FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary design and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and, (2) Approve in concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for FY 2001-2002. SUMMARY In 1998, a decision was made to insource the Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP). The Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division (ECM) has successfully accomplished all field elements of the ocean monitoring program for the past 2 years. In the process, the OMP budget has been reduced by $500,000 per year. To accomplish the field sampling, staff has had to rely on contract vessels for our monitoring needs. The number of contract vessels in the area is limited, and their availability is even more limited. The District's program is outgrowing some of the vessels that are used most frequently because of the increased size of the monitoring equipment and the number of staff needed for particular surveys. ECM staff has evaluated the feasibility of the District purchasing a vessel for ocean monitoring. Key factors such as safety, working conditions,financial feasibility, projected needs, and the availability of adequately sized contract vessels were examined and addressed in the attached staff report. Staff has concerns about the quality, efficiency, effectiveness, and limited capability of the vessels currently used. The need for a correctly sized and adequately equipped vessel is of paramount importance. The purchase of a monitoring vessel for$1.3 million will dramatically increase the safety of our monitoring staff, increase our productivity, and set our OMP as a world class operation. Staff recommends employing the services of a naval architect to evaluate the District's monitoring needs and provide a more detailed vessel cost evaluation and final design. G'.1xyDlabpentlaBOaM ABentla RepMiV 001 BCar4 ADentla flepOfI51D5D1\IIBm 1]11�0[BYn VefaN PUF95e.tlpC Re.oe¢ a GB Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY Budget 2001-02, Capital Equipment) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES Submit an RFP for a long-term contract (on the order of 10 years) for a contractor to provide a vessel meeting our specifications for annual usage between 175 and 225 days at a rate between $1,500 and $2,200 per day. The annual cost at these rates is: $1,500 / day $2,200 / day 175 days $262,500 1 $385,000 225 days $337,500 1 $495,000 ECM staff feels that this alternative is not the most cost-effective use of District's capital. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Ocean Monitoring Vessel Feasibility Evaluation c\xyAWU gende\Besrdnp ft RepavQWIe Id Agm .RePo.'I{WSOMM 13(1)OMnvea Pu,wxem R W W"a Page 2 y April 6, 2001 STAFF REPORT Ocean Monitoring Vessel Feasibility Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to evaluate the feasibility of purchasing a monitoring vessel for the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP). The conclusion of this effort has lead staff to make the recommendation for the District to purchase a monitoring vessel. The reasons for this recommendation are based on not only financial feasibility, but other key factors such as the safety of staff, availability of contract vessels, and future vessel needs. These and other issues are discussed in this report to provide management with a detailed evaluation of this recommendation. The District's Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division (ECM) administers the comprehensive and multifaceted OMP in support of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and 301(h)waiver. Part of this program includes using ocean research vessels to support the monitoring of receiving waters, sediments and organisms in the coastal environment. During the fiscal year 1999 to 2000 (FY 99-00), ECM conducted all fieldwork associated with the OMP to fulfill one of management's decisions to conduct the monitoring in-house rather than rely on outside contractors. As a result, we have increased our reliance on contract vessels for field sampling. The total cost for OMP contractor vessel support for 173 boat days during FY 99-00 was $172,250. Under ideal sea conditions this arrangement is marginally acceptable. However, under any other condition safety is compromised. The total cost of the ocean monitoring field sampling will increase as we shift to a vessel of adequate size and stability to accommodate sampling equipment and crew size. It is projected that the cost to contract such a vessel would be $2,200 per day. Based on last year's usage and projected needs, contracted field sampling would cost approximately$495,000 per year. Recently, state and federal regulators have expressed a desire to make various ocean- monitoring programs more compatible. Over the last two years, the District has been involved in an effort sponsored by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)to develop a "Model POTW Monitoring Program:' This program would be used by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the various Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB)to modify monitoring programs in future permits. The model program will include three major elements— core monitoring, special studies and regional monitoring. This model template is the same one used by G:Wgdl PWa, dNw R�la Wngem Rwp WWwmm 1310.0ean Ve NNm.ax RedaN: eaves Page 3 the District for its ocean-monitoring program, therefore staff does not anticipate major changes to our program when the model-monitoring program is finally adopted. ECM staff has concerns about the safety of the contract research vessels that are available in southern California. The vessels used most frequently by the District are small and relatively unstable in moderate (wind speeds in excess of 10 MPH) sea conditions. The shipboard environment is a potentially dangerous environment. Contributing factors are motion, noise, vibration, exposure to weather, close working conditions, vessel machinery, sampling gear, wet surfaces, and lines under tension. All pose a threat to the safety of the scientific crew. Providing a larger vessel would greatly reduce the risk of personnel injury and equipment damage. The District's OMP was compared to the programs of Los Angeles County Sanitation District(LACSD), the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego. Program elements are comparable in scope and size. All three agencies conduct all of their monitoring in- house and each own two or three vessels. Staff also surveyed these three POTW's regarding their vessel operating costs. Costs varied among agencies and no per-vessel dollar amounts were given. The City of San Diego's budget is $50,000 per year for maintenance of their two vessels, but rarely spends that amount. The vessel captain performs most of the maintenance. Work that is beyond the captain's capabilities is performed by contractors or in some cases by other agency personnel. Staff presents a couple of options with regard to providing a licensed captain to pilot the proposed vessel. The District could either hire a captain or contract out the position. A licensed captain ensures that a minimum level of competency and experience is achieved. On a vessel the size needed for our monitoring program, it is reasonable to expect the captain to have a thorough working knowledge of the mechanical systems on board and possess the ability to perform the maintenance of those systems. Staff has determined that we would need a vessel between 55 and 65 feet in length. The vessel must be stable and properly equipped to deploy a variety of monitoring devices to effectively complete all elements of our monitoring program. The estimated cost of a vessel this size, designed to our specifications and equipped with all of the electronics for navigation, would cost between $900,000 and $1.2 million (calculation is based on an industry estimate of$15,000 to $20,000 per linear foot of vessel, using a 60-foot vessel). PURPOSE The purpose of this staff report is to evaluate whether or not the District should purchase a vessel for its OMP. Currently, ECM staff administers a comprehensive and multifaceted OMP in support of the District's NPDES permit and 301(h)waiver. Part of this OMP includes using ocean research vessels to support the monitoring of receiving waters, sediments, and organisms in the local coastal environment. G:"AW�endal Onenm fty VNIe WA da Fey WWIuum I3(0. wn Ve Puree dm Aeee MOM Page 4 V This report gives the background of the OMP and discusses recent program changes, safety concerns, current program costs, and projected costs for the vessel and related expenses of ownership. Because one of management's overall objectives is to make ECM the primary service provider for the OMP, relying on contractor support only where necessary, this will ultimately change the OMP from a "contractor-driven" program to a "contractor- supported" program. During FY 1999-00,the OMP insourced monitoring fieldwork that was previously performed by contractors. This has increased the demand for vessel usage by OMP staff, which has resulted in a number of logistical problems. The working assumption for this report is that the District could own and operate its own vessel in a safe and cost-effective manner that would enhance our ability to meet our current and future monitoring needs. BACKGROUND The District has a long history of monitoring the effects of our discharge on the coastal marine waters in support of our ocean discharge permit. The District's offshore monitoring effort includes sampling for water quality, benthic environment (sediment geochemistry and biological assessment), and trawls for assessing fish and invertebrate community health and structure. Each program element contains the following types of work: field sampling, sample analysis, data handling and reporting, data interpretation, and summary report writing, culminating in the OMP Annual Report. From the early 1970's until 1985, District's staff did all the work, including all field sample collection, oceanography, and marine biology studies. With the issuance of the 301(h)waiver in 1985, the mandated OMP was redesigned with additional program components to determine compliance with the California Ocean Plan and 301(h) criteria. A management decision for this new Ocean Monitoring Program was made to out-source the program because it was determined that the elements of the mandated OMP were beyond the District's resources at that time. Being a high-profile program, it was also felt that having a third-party" contractor conduct the program added a degree of objectivity and "instant credibility"that would allow the program to better stand up to scrutiny by regulators, environmental groups and the public. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)was subsequently selected through a competitive bid process. While the contractor-driven approach to the OMP was appropriate at the time, the paradigm has changed. With the re-issuance of our 301(h)waiver in 1998, the OMP was redesigned to include three program elements— Core, Regional, and Strategic Process Studies (SPS). The Core Monitoring Program has been designed to address two major issues. First, to determine permit compliance with state and federal criteria. Second, to continue a long-term time line to identify data trends and determine whether any observed changes are due to natural conditions or to human impacts. Participation G.Wq.e.,naa, .Ayenaa Fepa .'B W Ppenaa R¢pvla\0501111em 1MD.Ve PURx Ra.: WMS Page 5 v in regional monitoring is also a requirement of our permit. This involves cooperative monitoring of the Southern California Bight (SCB)with other local, state and federal agencies. Finally, SIPS are stated goals of the District's ocean monitoring program. The purpose of SPS is to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that affect discharges into the marine environment. The OMP staff also carries out additional special projects, such as the Huntington Beach 9 North investigation. In July 1998, District management made a decision to in-source the OMP. The initial phases were completed in May 1999, with the in-sourcing of the benthic and trawl field sampling and chemistry program components. Phase II of the in-sourcing project brought the OMP database management system and the writing of the annual report in- house. This phase is currently in progress. The largest remaining contract dependency in the OMP is contract vessels. The other three major southern California POTWs, including the City of San Diego with a 301(h)waiver, conduct in-house ocean monitoring programs with support of their own vessels. INCREASED NEED FOR VESSELS Changes to District's Ocean Monitoring Program Recently, state and federal regulators have expressed a desire to make various ocean- monitoring programs more compatible. Over the last two years the District has been involved in an effort with SCCWRP to develop a "Model POTW Monitoring Program" that would be used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the various Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB)to modify monitoring programs in future permits. The model program will include three major elements—core monitoring, special studies, and regional monitoring. This model template is the same one used by the District for its ocean-monitoring program so staff does not anticipate major changes to our program when the model monitoring program is finally adopted. Core Monitoring: The District's Core Monitoring Program has been designed to address two major issues. One is to determine permit compliance with state and federal criteria. The other is to continue long-term sampling that will allow the District to identify data trends and determine whether observed changes are due to natural conditions or to human impacts. While the type of monitoring for this program element won't change, the methods will. For example, future water quality sampling will probably include the use of oceanographic moorings in conjunction with routine water quality surveys to better capture and understand temporal variability of the receiving waters. The use of moorings will require additional vessel needs for deployment and servicing. The number of days needed is dependent upon the number and type of instrumentation deployed on these moorings. Regional Monitoring: Participation in regional monitoring is a requirement of our permit. This involves cooperative monitoring of the SCB with other local, state, and federal agencies. The frequency of this sampling has been every four years c:"AMW sneamreNngaaa i+eoms 1e n wwpwummnum„�n.oc«,n veaa wrmw.em �W: aaome Page 6 (1994, 1998) with the next sampling to occur in 2002. The level of effort and vessel days required for this monitoring should be consistent with past efforts. Fourteen boat days were required to complete the Regional Monitoring in 1998. Strategic Process Studies (SPS): One of the stated goals of the District's ocean monitoring program—and one that is being adopted for the Model POTW Monitoring Program — is to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological processes that affect discharges into the marine environment. This knowledge will lead to improved management of the discharge of urban runoff and treated wastewater into the coastal marine environment. Each year, the District, in concert with EPA and the RWQCB, adopts the SPS that then become permit requirements. Future SPS will require vessel time to deploy oceanographic equipment, and collect sediment and biological samples. Special or Cooperative Studies: Non-permit required studies require the use of an oceanographic research vessel. Examples are the 1999 Huntington Beach beach closure and the studies to identify the source. Both studies required significant vessel support. Ongoing investigations off Huntington Beach also require vessel support. SCCW RP research done in our study area often requires the use of a vessel provided by the District. In addition, other research groups (e.g., NOAA, USGS, and EPA) have expressed interest in doing studies in our area that would benefit from the use of a District-owned vessel. Finally, routine operational inspections of the outfall pipe require the support of a research vessel. SAFETYISSUES Vessels for hire are chosen based on the specific vessel characteristics, cost, and the survey to be performed. The number of available and affordable research vessels in southern California Is small. Each vessel has limitations and staff has concerns about those limitations with regard to safety and comfort of the scientific crew. As a member of the scientific crew, one must learn to work safely in a potentially dangerous shipboard environment. Such factors as motion, noise, vibration, exposure to weather, close working conditions, vessel machinery, sampling gear, uneven surfaces, wet surfaces, and lines under tension are not normally encountered on shore. As such, the size and stability of the vessel is important. Most monitoring equipment is heavy and awkward when being deployed and retrieved. There is a risk of personal injury or equipment damage when equipment is being launched and recovered from a small boat that is pitching and rolling. Staff uses every precaution to avoid personal injury and equipment damage. However, sea conditions, vessel stability, and fatigue dictate the success or failure of a deployment. A larger more stable vessel with a larger working area would significantly reduce the risk of personal injury and equipment damage. Another concern is that sea conditions usually deteriorate in the afternoon as the wind increases. The vessels we currently use to perform much of the monitoring are G.x dYNwOn dAgent Repmze l BwM Agenda ReWs%OWNlem 13M. mnVe pWiaY.aa R.N. a 5 Page 7 relatively small and are unstable in somewhat light to moderate sea conditions (wind speeds in excess of 10 mph). Monitoring has been canceled when conditions deteriorated, and rescheduled when sea conditions were more favorable. Staff spends considerable effort and time mobilizing for each survey. Using a more stable survey vessel would decrease the number of aborted surveys, and reduce costs associated with rescheduling and mobilizing a survey. Crew fatigue while conducting field sampling is also an important safety consideration. Trying to maintain balance on a small boat that is pitching and rolling while handling heavy monitoring equipment is physically exhausting. Couple this with a three or four- day survey and even the most fit are fatigued. This is when the potential for accidents increases. The vessels we currently contract also lack adequate cabin space. The majority of the cabin space is used for scientific instrumentation, sample collection equipment, and personal gear. As a consequence, the crew is displaced. With limited cabin space, conditions are cramped and congested. Typically, staff has two meals onboard each day, and with limited space, there is virtually no place to sit, other than the cabin floor or outside on the deck in the work area. CURRENT VESSEL COSTS Each OMP element requires the services of a boat that is suitable for the survey to be undertaken. The vessel is required to have state-of-the-art equipment for navigation, positioning, and mechanical systems for equipment deployment and sample processing. The table below provides a breakdown for vessel expenses and non-tangibles for fiscal year1999. Organization Enchanter Seaventures SCMI Davey's Total Locker Price per day $700 $1550 $2,500 $800 #of days used in 137 9 24 3 173 1999 Total Cost $95,900 $13,950 $60,000 $2,400 $172,25 0 Support all No No Yes No monitoring program elements Safetv Fair I Fair I Good I Good Efficiency(transit Poor Poor Good Good time,deck space, etc). Availability Excellent Limited Limited Poor An evaluation of the commercial vessels available for the District's OMP shows that only one is capable of handling all of the requested field sampling. However, the availability of this vessel (SCMI) is limited due to the extensive use as an educational platform and c:wv.ammae�ae�eovanewz sewu�oo+eoab new.a=o�•dmimam iamae. vela nnm.x.aoo Page 8 V support for the USC Wrigley Institute. This vessel is also expensive. In addition, use of these platforms requires District staff to adapt sampling methods and equipment based on the constraints of the vessel and not on optimal sampling methodologies. The total cost of the ocean monitoring field sampling will increase as we shift to a vessel of adequate size and stability to accommodate sampling equipment and crew size. It is projected that the cost to contract such a vessel would be $2,200 per day. Based on last year's usage and projected needs, contracted field sampling would cost approximately $495,000 per year. A major problem with contract vessels is their availability. There are no guarantees that the District can obtain a vessel at the required time. Routine monitof ng takes place within specific time frames for each program element. At other times a rapid response is necessary to sample during specific oceanographic conditions or during "events", as was the case of the Huntington Beach beach closure. It is critical that a vessel is readily available for the District's OMP. In addition to the direct cost of contracting and chartering a vessel, there are significant internal administrative costs associated with securing a vessel for the ocean-monitoring program. These costs are for time spent by ECM, Purchasing, and Accounting staff in preparing bid proposals for contracted vessels, attorney contract evaluation, bid evaluations, checking insurance coverage, purchase requisitions, approving invoices, and paying contractors. HOW DO WE COMPARE WITH OTHER AGENCIES? There are three sanitation agencies in Southern California that have ocean monitoring programs similar in size and scope to the District that were contacted to compare their vessel operational needs. The agencies are Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD), the City of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego. A ane Own/Contract #Vessels Len th ft. LACSD Own 3 66 25 19 CI of LP, Own 2 85,65 San Diego Own 2 42.30 OCSD I Contract 4 39-65 PROJECTED VESSEL EXPENSES Vessel Requirements In an effort to eliminate our dependence on contracted vessels to conduct our ocean monitoring, staff has conducted a work boat audit to determine the size of the boat and equipment needed to best support the District's ocean monitoring program. We have evaluated the pros and cons of the vessels we currently work with as well as those operated by the City of LA, LA County, and San Diego. G:MyA..,end.l dROan.R,N UW1B Id Agenda R¢pheN501111gn 13�I�.00een Ve11N Pu,efBlB.M Rdvi.ed. g(1g9R Page 9 8 There are no "off the shelf'work boat designs in production that will fill the District's needs. Work boats are typically designed for specific functions. This, however, doesn't mean that we need to start from the costly design stage. There are boats being manufactured for functions other than research that would provide us with a vessel of adequate length and propulsion. Choosing a proven hull design and modifying the superstructure to meet our monitoring requirements will significantly reduce overall costs. Staff has determined we would need a boat between 55- and 65-feet in length. It has to be stable and properly equipped to deploy a variety of monitoring devices to complete all elements of our monitoring program. The estimated cost of a vessel this size, designed to our specifications and equipped with all the electronics for navigation, would cost between $900,000 and $1.2 million (calculation is based on an industry estimate of$15,000 to $20,000 per linear foot of vessel, using a 60-foot vessel). Maintenance Costs The City of San Diego budgets $50,000 per year for routine contract maintenance of the two vessels. They indicated that most years they don't spend that amount. They have exceeded $50,000 on occasion when they had to replace major mechanical systems. Routine maintenance, per vessel, includes annual haul-out to clean and repaint the bottom, $3,500 - $5,000; monthly in the water, hull cleaning, $1,000 - $1,500 per year; oil and filter changes, engine tune up, hydraulic system maintenance, engine and wash down pump maintenance, winch and mechanical cable service, battery service and replacement, paint, etc. All of the maintenance is performed by the captain or is contracted out. The City of San Diego OMP staff performs no maintenance work. The City of San Diego also budgets $15,000 per year for fuel and has a contract with a supplier. The cost of fuel for commercial use is less than that for recreational boats. LACSD didn't provide fixed dollar figures but implied the yearly maintenance of the three vessels is minimal, with the biggest expense being the annual haul-out($5,000)of the 66-foot boat. The captain and crew (2) are responsible for all the maintenance of the three boats. Other agency maintenance personnel or contractors perform any maintenance beyond the crews' capabilities. Mooring Costs Location: There are two harbors that are most suitable for mooring a District vessel, Newport Harbor and Sunset/Huntington Harbor. Both are located within ten miles of District's Plant 1 and Plant 2 facilities that minimizes staff travel time and allows rapid transit to the District's offshore sampling area. Using other local harbors (e.g., Dana Point and Long Beach)would significantly increase mobilization and transit time. c%w deacagenclaaBnard Agenda Repcna@aol 2 mAgetla Rep sVnW,wem 43(Q ocean Vaud PdnN9ee.dcc Ra"sad: Mew Page 10 _a Mooring types: Three groups offer moorings that could be used by the District. These are the County of Orange, the City of Newport Beach, and various private marina operators. The two basic types of vessel moorings offered are slips and offshore "cans" or moorings. With the need to load heavy gear, to have a freshwater source and electricity, the cost of offshore cans was not evaluated. County of Orange: The County has few slips available and none that would accommodate a vessel 45-to 50-feet in length. These slips are used as guest slips for very limited duration. They do offer offshore cans. City of Newport Beach: Operates the Balboa Yacht Basin. Monthly slip fees are $17.00/foot for vessels up to 50-feet in length and $20.00/foot for vessels over 50-feet or$765 - $1,000. There is currently a two-year wait for slips. Private Marina Operators: Several privately operated marinas are available. Monthly slip fees range from $12.50—23.75 /foot or$600 - $1,000. Waiting lists for private marinas are a minimum of one year. Staff recommends submitting our name to the waiting list at the Balboa Yacht Basin Marina until a slip is available. In the interim, we would secure a berth at another marina. As mentioned above, the monthly fee would be about $1,000. This is the worst case scenario, and it may be possible to reduce or eliminate the cahrges is n agreement can be worked out with the City of Newport Beach. Captain and Crew Staff has conducted a survey of the City of San Diego, LACSD, and the City of Los Angeles to determine how they captain their vessels. All have hired full time licensed captains to operate their respective vessels. In addition, they have staff hired as crew who help with the operation while at sea, and are qualified small boat operators. As mentioned, all three agencies have two or three boats. The captain and crew are also responsible for the maintenance of the boats. The captain's responsibilities include the legal overall charge of the entire operation of the vessel. Licensed personnel insure that they meet the minimum level of competency and experience. The captain is ultimately responsible for the safety of the crew. On a vessel, the size needed for our monitoring program, it is not unreasonable to expect the captain to possess a thorough working knowledge of the vessel's mechanical systems and possess the ability to perform maintenance to those systems. The District has several options with regard to a vessel captain: 1) The District could hire a full time licensed captain to pilot the boat and perform the routine maintenance similar to the operation of other agencies. Other District trade persons or contractors would perform maintenance tasks beyond his expertise %m A.a nfta n .rt�lmWrwsw Aeeuewwiwem i�nocevveaw w,uaxam R�SM:� Page 11 P 2) The duties of captain and routine maintenance could be contracted out. 3) District personnel could be trained to obtain the U.S. Coast Guard operator's license. (The cost of the training class is $850 and takes approximately 80 hours. (The U.S. Coast Guard license fee is $250.) District personnel and contractors would perform routine maintenance. The District's Human Resources Division conducted a salary survey of other agency's Boat Captain positions. The following summarizes their findings. Agency Agency Job Salary Range Maximum Benefits Rate Title Minimum CSDLA Boat Captain $4 303 $5,346 36% City of San Senior Boat 3,072 $3,665 30% Diego Operator City Of Los Fireboat Pilot $6,111 $6,810 30% Angeles County of Los Senior Rescue $5,089 $6,322 34.7% Angeles Boat captain Insurance Other POTWs were surveyed with regard to how they insure their vessels. All are self- funded. The District's Finance Department obtained an estimate of what it would cost to insure a 60-111. vessel, if we were to go with an insurance carrier. They derived the following: Limit Deductible Annual Premium Vessel P81 $1 Million $2,500 $1,000 (Liability) Jones Act Coverage $1 Million $2,500 $2,000 for Captain 8 Crew Vessel Hull(Property) Value of vessel $10-$50 K 1.35%of vessel value Based on a vessel value of$975,000 the total annual premium would be $16,162. Financial Analysis The District's Finance Division performed a cost analysis for a contract vessel versus the cost of vessel ownership. The analysis uses a vessel purchase price of$975,000. The estimated annual vessel operating cost is $162,762. Respective opportunity costs (the loss of the 6% investment return)of$58,500 was added to determine the total estimated cost. As mentioned, the cost of chartering ocean-monitoring vessels will increase in the future. We will employ the services of a larger, more stable vessel for the safety of the crew and equipment. Gb A4%g�\Baa,E ROeM RBNA51 lB Td ft..FeV�+`n-d` tweet 194O Vu Purtlufe.Ex ftW�, a Page 12 Two scenarios are presented using costs per day of vessels that are capable of fulfilling all Districts monitoring vessel needs. In the scenario the daily rate is $2,200. Scenario one is based on the current usage and Scenario 2 is based on the projected needs. The annual projected charter costs is $385,000 and $495,000, respectively. The savings from ownership would range from $163,738 to$272,738. The pay back would be 3.56 to 5.95 years. Ocean Monitoring Vessel Purchase vs. Contract Assumptions(Annualized) Purchase Price: $975,000 Amortization period in years 20 Annual depreciation $48,750 Annual Cost Fuel Maintenance Engine Maintenance $6,600 Clean and Paint $5,000 Normal Maintenance $10,000 Engine Rebuild$20,000 Q 5 year intervals $4,000 Total Maintenance $25,600 Salary& Benefits: (Captain) $94,000 Mooring cost $12,000 Insurance premium Vessel P&I $1,000 Jones Act $2,000 Vessel Hull $13,162 Total Insurance $16,162 Estimated operating cost $162,762 Opportunity cost $58,500 Total estimated cost(excluding depreciation) $221,262 Projected contract cost for equivalent 175 days 225 days Vessel: @$2,200/day $385,000 $495,000 Purchase vs. Contract Increase(Decrease) Projected-Total estimated ($163,738) ($273,738) Pay Back 5.95 years 3.56 years Conclusion It is recommended that management support the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel and that monies be budgeted for the design and construction. There are no "off e:wv.emagea.�mem nomea sc UWIe dAw seooeOWIM.13l0.o nv ..n wrcnm.eoc ae.xa: e�zase Page 13 r Q the shelf' monitoring vessels. However, there are vessels of similar design and function that will closely match many of the Districts requirements. To move forward on this recommendation staff suggests performing a thorough search of research vessels of proven design in the specified size class. Once the field of acceptable vessels has been narrowed down, we should employ the services of a naval architect to incorporate our requirements into the design. FO:wh:mcm GAwp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports%2001 Board Agenda Reports\M1\Item 13(t).0cean Vessel Purunase.dw G:lxyAWl WiMal rd Agwft ee..VW1 a MA .Wg MWtUh telg.p MVeasd PurNaW M ee WM Page 14 OMTS COMMITTEE MeeangDate To8E.ofDir. s121o1 s1310o1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Numbe OMTSOI-22 13(4) Orange County Sanitation District _ FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Deirdre Hunter, Senior Environmental Specialist SUBJECT: HUNTINGTON BEACH SHORELINE CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION, PHASE III, JOB NO. J-85, UPDATE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES Power Plant portion of studies, for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85, for a total project budget of$2,925,000; (2) Authorize staff to seek reimbursement from AES Power Plant for $350,000; (3)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts, including those in excess of$100,000, with government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those contracts; and, (4) Pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies relating to said project would be made available by the District. SUMMARY Staff has planned a series of integrated studies to look at whether the elevated bacteria counts seen along portions of Huntington Beach during the previous two summers, especially in the vicinity of the AES power plant, can be attributed to the District's wastewater plume. Staff initially proposed a $1,620,000 budget for the project, although only$1,000,000 was actually approved because of the way the recommendation was crafted. In accordance with the Board's request, staff is continuing to seek external funding sources. However, these monies will not be available before the studies are scheduled to begin in May and resource commitments need to be made now. Therefore, staff is requesting that the Board authorize the additional $1.575 million as part of an overall not to exceed budget of$2.575 million. The OMTS Committee approved this proposal in concept at the April 4, 2001 meeting. DEH:wh �'49dreWWMa1BaeN A9[^a Repp =018.e Apmda rt.p WW"Mm 13(1)HBeec Page 1 fleneM'.40011�1:anrot(c )4aae11mm1 The first 24-hour receiving water study will be performed on May 21-22, 2001 and the + moorings will be deployed by June. The contracts and supply purchases need to be made in a very short timeframe. Therefore, staff is requesting that the General Manager be given authorization to negotiate and award the necessary contracts (including sole source contracts in excess of$100,000)to ensure that all the planned studies can be performed this summer. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approved budgeted amount is $1 million. This request if for an additional $1,575,000 to cover upfront expenses while staff is continuing to search for funding. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Beginning in late fall 2000, staff began planning the studies needed to evaluate Dr. Stanley Grant's (UCI) hypothesis that oceanographic processes along with an interaction between the AES power plant in Huntington Beach could entrain and transport bacteria to the beach from our ocean outfall discharge plume. During the spring through fall of 2001, the District will conduct a series of integrated studies of the offshore and shoreline waters, currents, and sediments off Huntington Beach to test the hypothesis. This month's update includes information on the following topics: Background • Funding Status and Update on Costs • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings • Coordination of OCSD Investigation with Other Studies Huntington Beach Shoreline Investigation Background To be able to investigate the question regarding the potential that the District's plume reaches the beach, staff has designed a series of studies with input from a Technical Advisory Committee (TAG) and oceanographic consultants. The general objectives of these studies are: DEH:wh G.�.ft%W.Eal Aaen.Rep QWI B W AWU RePe WWII.13(lft.do Page 2 RewseO: ar5mi(vn):all]Nt(xn)a2]Nt(mm) . Determine whether indicator bacteria are present in the nearshore region between the District's deep-water ocean outfall and the shore; . Determine if the District's outfall is a source for these bacteria; and . Determine the oceanographic or meteorological mechanisms that can transport the District's treated wastewater toward shore. Funding Status and Update on Costs At the February 2001 meeting, the Board approved a $1,000,000 budget for consulting services to support the Huntington Beach summer Investigation surveys. The agenda report, presentations, and verbal discussions at the Board meeting all referred to a $1.62 million budget estimate. The General Manager's Recommendation did not include the staff and supply costs as they were referenced in the text of the agenda report and job plan. At the direction of members of the OMTS Committee, staff was advised to seek outside funding and grants to support expenses in excess of the approved $1 million. Although potential sources of funding are being pursued, they will not be available in time for the summer studies. As cost-sharing money becomes available, the District's costs may be reimbursed and applied to the cost of this project. The five 46-hour and one 24-hour receiving water studies to be performed this summer will require over 51,000 microbiological tests. As a result, staff must order about $350,000 worth of materials from the supply houses. Two hundred seventy one thousand dollars of microbiological media, sample bottles and bacteriological quantification trays must be ordered from a single manufacturer, Idexx Corp. Idexx is the only company that sells this bacteria rapid test method. Because of the volume of supplies, the logistics of receiving the shipments, and the importance of receiving these supplies in time for the first sampling event in May, an initial order has been placed with Idexx under the General Manager's signature authority for approximately $99,000. This amount is included in the total budget amount of$2.575 million. Table 1 contains the most recent estimated project costs and the funding gap that staff is requesting from the Board. DEH:wh G1M4eeYmWlBaad ABonJ RCW,sUdd1 B®Id A Vda RepG,51B'WWIM 1d9)XB dw Page 3 PeNW:.2rod 1.�1:u9ro1(wnl amo11mm1 r Physical Oceanographic Fieldwork.,June—September 2001 $1,000,000 Moorings Analytical work.,October 2001 —June 2002 Receiving Water Quality May—September 2001 $ 800,000' Measurements Caged Mussel June 1 —September 30,2001 $ 125,000 Biomonitoring Nearshore Sediments July-August 2001 $ 125,000 Data Mining On-going $ 150,000 Plume Modeling On-going $ 125,000 Data Analysis&Reporting October 2001 —June 2002 $ 250,000 Total Cost for Distrieft Studies $2,575,000 Approved Budget $1,000,000 Funding Gap ($1,675,000) `This cost includes reimbursements to other the agencies for their participation in the study. The study is logistically too large for the District to accomplish by itself. Although agencies will contribute as much in- kind services as possible, the District may need to reimburse them for overtime and material costs. Therefore, staff is requesting that the Board authorize the additional $1.575 million as part of the overall $2.575 million. At the April 4, 2001 meeting of the OMTS Subcommittee, this proposal was approved in concept. Coordination of OCSD Investigation with Other Studies The District is one of several institutions funding studies related to the Huntington Beach pollution. Staff understands the importance of coordinating with the other agencies and researchers to ensure the most integrated and clear understanding of the data. Listed below is a brief description of the studies presently underway or being planned to investigate the Huntington Beach shoreline contamination issue, the responsible agency, and how the District sees its participation. Key participants include the County of Orange (Public Facilities and Resources Department), UCI, AES and their environmental consultant MBC Applied Environmental Sciences, USC SeaGrant, National Water Research Institute, the Orange County Health Care Agency, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and possibly Scripps Institute of Oceanography. County of Orange/ NWRI / UCI Santa Ana River Study In December 1999 and May 2000, principal investigator, Dr. Stanley Grant,from UCI performed extensive investigations at the mouth of the Talbert Marsh that looked at the amount of bacteria that was contributed to the surfzone from upstream stormwater pump stations and the marsh. A similar study of loadings to the surfzone from the mouth of the Santa Ana River will be performed during the summer of 2001. The District sends a representative to the regular coordination DEH:wh G.^aV.Me`aRna�BoaE Werd!IiGppItl3CUf 9mtlM�W Rero-l5050111iem t�l9�HBEc[ Page 4 aewea:esn1 MM:411701 p )4=1(mml meetings sponsored by the County of Orange and UCI. The District will likely be contributing microbiology services and/or materials to the Santa Ana River study. The District will coordinate with the UCI group to ensure data collection is optimized to provide information that can be used by other area studies. USC SeaGrant Nearshore Process & Microbiological Studv USC investigators Burton Jones, Jed Fuhrman, and Douglas Sherman will be examining the contamination transport and concentration processes that occur in the nearshore area, close to the AES power plant, during the summer of 2001. The investigation will also include source tracking using a virus fingerprinting method. The District will coordinate with the USC group to ensure data collection is optimized to provide information that can be used by other area studies. The data should be part of the overall understanding of the linkage between nearshore and offshore processes. The District will be assisting USC with their investigation of shoreline microbiology and nearshore receiving water conditions. AES Power Plant/ MBC Applied Environmental Services Nearshore Processes Studv The AES power plant currently has applied to California Energy Commission (CEC) to increase its operating capacity. The CEC, the California Coastal Commission, and the public have expressed concerns regarding the AES-OCSD plume interactions. AES and its environmental consultant, MBC Applied Environmental Services, is expected to perform monitoring in the nearshore area. AES and MBC have attended coordination meetings in which their assistance was discussed. The District will be presenting a proposal to AES that should include nearshore moorings by Scripps, nearshore monitoring using MBC's boat, and tasks that should help reduce the cost of the District's project by an amount yet to be determined. These studies add a more thorough element that will help explain what is occurring in the nearshore. NWRI Source Tracking Methods Studv One of the major dilemmas in solving the bacteria problems on Huntington Beach and across the world is determining where the bacteria are coming from. Currently there is no standardized bacteria source identification method. NWRI will be funding a study to utilize various source-tracking techniques. The participants in source-tracking investigations include Roger Fujioka from the University of Hawaii, David White from the University of Tennessee, Harry Ridgway from the Orange County Water District, Douglas Moore from the Orange County Health Care Agency, and Dr. Stanley Grant and Sunny Jiang from UCI. These results can also be compared with the results of USC's fingerprinting study and routine standardized sampling methods for enterococci, total ooliform, and fecal coliform. The researchers will be comparing whether the bacteria populations from the river, marsh, surfzone station 9N, and the District's effluent are similar or different. DEH:wh G+xy.000penNt9aara Agee �`fitBwen npenaa Fepwlsw50Num INOWeaa Page 5 n msm: 4WI(w J;4117ml(v )nrzwt(m ) Orange County PFRD / US Army Corns of Engineers (ACOE) Understanding nearshore and shoreline transport mechanisms is also important in maintaining sand on local beaches. Presently the County of Orange's Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) and the ACOE are developing a circulation sampling and modeling project for the lower reaches of the Santa Ana River. The study is currently trying to secure funding and may start by fall 2001. Through coordination efforts, the two studies' data can still be complementary. Technical Advisory Committee The District invited a group of individuals representing, local stakeholders, regulators, academics, consultants, interested environmental groups, and the general public to serve as independent reviewers of the Phase III study design. The TAC meetings also ensure an open meeting process for the public and the press to observe the study's progress and findings. The final TAC meeting to review the draft workplan has been scheduled for April 20, 2001 with the draft workplan due to the TAC by April 13, 2001. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A DEH:wh G Yry.dWt enEa)Bw,E ppe gepyb�iB MMmM Regng ,,p 13101X8 Uoc Page 6 Rerisea:amaf(vn):an7m11rm1a2Yrol I,mml PDC COMMITTEE MeebngDad.or Do-. s/vate To /oI s1231 AGENDA REPORT ItemNumber [em4 lu(c) Pm Nu b6 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS REINVENTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Sole Source Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for development of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2 for a total amount not to exceed $308,000. SUMMARY In June 2000, the Engineering Department initiated an effort to improve project management and project delivery practices. This effort is referred to as the Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Reinvention, and is planned as a three-phase project. The goal of the CPMP Reinvention is to improve delivery of capital projects. The District's $1.5 Billion, 20 year Capital Improvement Project (CIP) includes approximately$300M in design, project management, and administration costs. Even a small improvement in project delivery efficiency has the potential for significant savings. Improvements to the CPMP include implementation of practices from the Project Management Institute Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)that have been found to be applicable to the District's projects. Phase 1, of the CPMP reinvention effort completed in February 2001, assessed present procedures, defined the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) project management requirements, and developed 37 specific recommendations for improvements. With Phase 1 completed, a Scope of Work has been developed for Phase 2. Phase 2 of the CPMP Reinvention will develop an implementation plan for the 37 recommended improvements, including development of customized written guidelines for project management. Phase 3 will consist of implementation of the procedures developed in Phase 2, including a training program. Full implementation of the reinvented CPMP is planned for a two-year period. Staff recommends awarding a Consulting Services Agreement to the Lewis Group for Phase 2 for a total fee not to exceed $308,000. This is a sole source recommendation based on the Lewis Group's qualifications and excellent performance on Phase 1. The proposed fee was negotiated with the Lewis Group based upon the Scope of Work developed in Phase 1. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please refer to the attached Consulting Services Agreement Status Report. G. yAUNgenda�mW Agenda aepma 01 sous Acme rtee WWI%ium 14(c)L rn.mc aeaem:mom Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The proposed Consulting Services Agreement fee, not to exceed $308,000, is included in the Engineering Department Joint Operating budget. The budget includes a total of$460,000 from FY2000/01 through FY2001102 for Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Reinvention. - The estimated expenditure for Phase 1 in FY2000/01 is $116,000, leaving $344,000 to complete the project in FY2001/02. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed CPMP Reinvention Phase 1 recommendations are based upon principles from the Project Management Institute's Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). The Project Management Institute (PMI) is an international organization fostering professionalism and providing guidelines and education in the field of project management. The practice of project management is a field distinct from engineering or other technical disciplines. The intent of the Phase 2 implementation plan is to have the positive results listed below: • Significant savings in project delivery costs. • A standard project life cycle and project management methodology is used throughout the Orange County Sanitation District (District). • The Operations& Maintenance Department participates fully as partners and members of the project organization. • Project work is integrated with on-going District operations and asset management. • Customer satisfaction is measured at a high level. • Quality and risk management practices are incorporated into all projects. • Projects are evaluated, controlled and managed proactively through project schedules and budgets. • A District-wide project management information system is operating. • All capital projects are evaluated upon completion and the best practices and lessons learned will be captured for inclusion in a reference file for future projects. • Project management is established as a core professional competency in the District, and is rewarded as such. The proposed Phase 2 will form task forces including Staff from Engineering and other departments that will be impacted by the 37 specific recommendations included in the Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Phase 1 Report. The task forces will work with the Consultant to develop improved work processes to make improvements in the nine categories below. Phase 3 will provide training for implementation of the improved processes. The CPMP Reinvention process is planned for implementation over the next two years. cx ftd sema�agedaa Rff xSVWI mad ng« da RepMa%OWI\Item ia(c).i­dx k_n O: arz. Page 2 e Capital Project Process Capital Project Planning e Capital Project Scheduling Capital Project Execution a Project Manager Authority Engineering Department Structure e Engineering Department Planning Engineering Department Talent e Policies and Procedures ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with Phase 2 of the CPMP Reinvention. If we do not proceed with Phase 2, improvements to the District's project delivery may not be realized. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Consulting Services Agreement Status Report 2. Consultant Proposal Letter for Phase 2 Services AA.,jak:jo G.wpAallagendelBoard Agenda Reporb2001 Board Agenda 11epens\0501U1em 14(c).Levas.doc G.I. A .O RCCMS]001e ra Al-4.F,W'LsWWWM,.taauem6 Uoc aa. . eaoAa Page 3 Consulting Services Agreement Status Report Capital Project Management Process (CPMP), Phase 2 Total Project Budget: $460,000 Consultant: The Lewis Group Start Date of Project: May 1, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs Pending Original Develop implementation plans for the 37 $308,000 $308,000 Agreement recommendations from Phase 1, including customization of written guides for project management Q p.AWWl UOBS 8 CONTRACTS\Spea.No.9900-181Consulling Service Slalus Repad Phase 2.doc 05/10/01 R.Ised 05114/98 THE LEWIS GROUP MEMO 165 Culver Boulevard,Playa del Ray,CA 90293 USA PHONE(310)8V7 36M • FAX(310)827-OM • E-MAIL PeterCLawivOaoLc TO: Jim Herberg FROM: Peter C. Lewis DATE: March 6, 2001 RE: Proposal for CPMP Phase 2 This document is our proposal for providing consulting service to the Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Project Phi se 2. We understand that the goal of Phase 2 is to further develo and to establish implementation plans for the recommendation that have been approved by the District from Phase 1. As stated in the Scope of Work for Phase 2, we understand thak our firm will be responsible to create each implementation pla� and to gain its final approval. We understand that we shall support the two steering committees, the seven task forces, anc� numerous focus groups and interviews, as described in the Sco e of Work. Our estimated fees for the 274.50 consultant-days required foil Phase 2 is $308,000.00, The breakdown is as follows: a Implementation plans: $238,720.00 for 211.50 days a Project management: $69,280.00 for 63.04 days On the next page is a presentation of the estimated days that our project team members will provide towards each implementation plan and project management activity. The primary assignments (R+) and estimated fees are also shown fbr each line item. THE LEWIS GROUP • MEMO PACE 1 of 2 "-'• � • .��a au.uP a.uuOLreOro lGW1S eKUW Ygtic UJ Lewis Group Support for CPMP Phase 2 ASSIGNMENTS ESTIMATED DAYSyu� RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHASE 2 L.wl. s,Mlm Peuna. L.W. ss...s P.s.r.m TOTAL �s CAPITAL PRCIECT PR Ess ummfsbinN.m uvb.mm.georlCPN%.wRe 1 Sem.bswws�b•W rn.e Pam..��wa.r 1. 10 s smmim.e WUF a.mm�6b�b...R•0s1 1 A AWI im.YAv�Nn t. 2 DaM...rtmw.l.m.Wlb•...rM R. 2W O.W O.W 2A0 32.aW.W 5 DW N rt PbN wA.Y.wmNw r IW.MM64M1tlL.Oiwa+l 5 COV.Oi'OnbO.l b.wM.mNbn W�1mnr a. .N.I.eb.�.pwn.rm e.Pw.b.u3. a. CAPffAL PROJECT SCHEDULING if vAgY94wbE.�bNpGeW I'm omI .4nW u.Ybmbpbrr.ry0. 1 W .BtlO. I C%P Nw MnN.bdnmN 7.00 2.W 0. .m 1 . W. 20�Immblm O.ibYW MPM.m Ie.m�Mb.n 2.W MW I O.W 2.W a A1W Tlw Pence. M 1.W 3.W O.W I.W W.000.W aBS pofbbN mbwnbe.bmw'm 7 5 Gbwm�mu+om.wb+M...wm.n 3. 0. B SommY�e P®bnb�gbsu.pan 1. 2. .50 .1 . T Msm.ygln.Pm.wr.. t.0 3. s.m Tumnmwbbbaw ns.omia ROM too I=. om Oro 1.W 12 .W 3A0 0.W 3.W Sa.200. 0. O.ro .] �ro 1.W U.W .WT Te Me MANyYmn b,.vlry W D.W I D.W 1 0.75 .W RI URE ,gopm.A�•Pe�.O.b 1%tJlmun+^ B.W S.W 2.W 16W 2 nee eb..q.mrm.nnam 3.ro a.W 1.W .W .LW.W JENG S vp.a Oury nnmm M I.W fi.W ,BBO.W ♦Ny.Wm.0 INI DEPARTMENT DEP I PIANNI 1e��viebmb•�..•W1��� ® fi.W I :m I O.W I m. W .OW.00 ENGINEERING DEPANIMENTTAIENT .vrmy.e.cWbw blw.nOW Wrt M 3.W 1 SOD 1 000 1 J.W WOAD 3 T•.Mempm.bbpow..i. fi.W I.W 2.W 11. 12. % I SANG qES � b.P.,.mn.mblFA]�Nprm.e.wurmb W 1 3.W 3. 4.0 3 Tiemipu�laNnl.mbn.po.om NPasW'm � ),W 1.W I'm B.W 1 $W.W TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DESIGN DAYS �.Td PROJECT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 1 ma.m•.r th flW 3.W 1W 1a.b.5a 1.25 1.n la. $11,ot0.W 3 Pi.Pa bevbr:.,ob. a.W I.W 1.W sW SS01W 2.W 2.W 9.W S0.]W.W 3.W I.W 10. 511.a L 2.W 0.W SOD 2.W $2,100.W aro I.W 1.W q. fB.OW.W TOTAL PRGIELT MANAGEMEM DAYS 30.11 ta.25 12.25 W. 200. TOTAL PHASE 2 DAYS D THE LEWIS GROUP • MEMO PAGE 2 Of 2 ' PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Date TOM or .Dlr. s1v�o1 s23to1 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number _ PDC01-27 14 tl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-33BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo & Moore, and Converse Consultants, to provide for materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-33BD, for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for each consultant for July 2001/2002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($300,000 total). SUMMARY Capital projects require materials testing and geotechnical engineering consultation services for successful construction of the projects. Material testing services include soils, concrete, asphalt, and metals testing. Geotechnical engineering services may be required when unexpected or unusual soil conditions arise. Geotechnical consultants have traditionally provided these services for the District. Staff has selected Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants to provide materials testing and geotechnical engineering services to the District. The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July 2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as- needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the following one-year period. cawp.aaueenaa,eoa,a nv. m Reoana¢oo+scam nveaa Reponewwnuen,+a�a�svxoo+n.ax RenaeP. 82098 Page 1 Services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing and , geotechnical engineering services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the proposed numbers by considering average testing hours of past years along with present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects. 01/02 02/03 03/04 3-Year Total Law/Crandall $80,000 $130,000 $100,000 $310,000 Nino & Moore $80,000 $130,000 $100,000 $310,000 Converse Cons. $80,000 $130,000 $10Q000 $310,000 Total per Year $240,000 $390,000 $300,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting firms: • Smith-Emery • Ninyo & Moore • Converse • PSI • NMG Geotechnical • MTGL • Harrington Geotechnical • Leighton & Associates • Law/Crandall • Levine Fricke Eight consultants responded, and District staff selected three of those firms for recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide materials G:1vq.E,..penMlBwU ApeMa PepwO IB rd ilpenN R.q.6WWIMMT I9(a)SP 1-M,aa o.a..a: e @ Page 2 testing and geotechnical services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. Six District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following evaluation factors: • Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point score) • Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score) • Related service experience (point score) • Prior work experience with the consultants • Proposed fees Staff is recommending Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants to provide services to the District. These three firms received the highest evaluation point scores and were ranked the highest with all evaluation factors considered. Leighton & Associates submitted a fair proposal and low fees for most often used services. However, negative prior work experience with the consultant prompted non-consideration for final selection. MTGL received low scores for their proposal in the areas of related service experience and applicable staff qualifications. Service experience did not include wastewater projects. It centered mostly on small buildings and streets. Staff qualifications were good for engineers. However, no qualifications were given for field technicians, who will perform the majority of the testing work under this PSA. See attachment "Materials Testing/Geotechnical Services Evaluation Summary" for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The selection of three geotechnical firms to provide services to the District may be changed. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Materials Testing/Geotechnical Services Evaluation Summary MB:Ic O:W.y.eWe•�e•Bwro Apmm Ropes WWI EWro PpeMs WMM•9Ytvlem Iele16Wlgt-JJ.eoc Aom.ae:arsore, Page 3 Materials TestinglGeotechnical Services Evaluation Summary 5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board Ninyo 6 M. Lew Gibbs Converse Leighton Hatdngton Smith E. PSI MTOL Total Point Score 157 152 143 135 135 133 124 114 Fee Proposal of Most Often Used Services" $554 $532 $490 $408 $559 $553 $514 $583 Final Selection 2 1 3 Max.densbylooncrete compressive strength lab tests, soils compaction testing and inspection G:1vq.tllelengVOSS a CONTRACTWItolls,Survey,E-Tasting Contracts FY 01-041.Soils\Shcs Evaluatlon Summary.dac PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date TO so ar Dlr. 5/17101 5/23/01 AGENDA REPORT Item PDO01-28 Rem Nu) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-34BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for an amount not to exceed $120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000 total). SUMMARY Capital projects require a variety of surveying services for successful construction of the projects. These services include preliminary and construction alignments, contractor's staking, pipe casing/tunnel survey, and pipeline heading checks. Survey consultants have traditionally provided these services for the District. Staff has selected Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates to provide surveying services to the District. The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July 2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as- needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the following one-year period. Surveying services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All services will be charged to the project budgets. c,wp dta`age dmBdmm Agenda Reppda=l Bpmd Agenda ReWm05dnI,em 14(e).BP3W bN da Ra.W .. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the proposed numbers by considering average survey hours of past years along with present survey fees and scheduled future capital projects. 01/02 02/03 03104 3-Year Total Bell Land Survey. $120,000 $170,000 $95,000 $385,000 MDS Consulting $120,000 1170,000 $95,000 $385,000 Bush & Assoc. $120,000 $170,000 $95,000 $385,000 Total per Year $360,000 $510,000 1 $285,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Surveying funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting firms: • MDS Consulting • Forked Engineering & Surveying • DGA Consultants • Bell Land Surveying • Bush & Associates • Thomas A. King Five consultants responded, and District staff selected three of those fines for recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide surveying services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. Six District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following evaluation factors: G:wq.ata�dA RepwisV.l0 do d.gepylSASpTIkm tn�el sv:ow-x.aoc R..W ... Page 2 • Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point score) • Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score) • Related service experience (point score) • Prior work experience with the consultants • Proposed fees Staff is recommending Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates to provide surveying services to the District. These three firms received the highest evaluation point scores and were ranked the highest with all evaluation factors considered. Forkert Engineering & Surveying did not meet required qualifications for field personnel. DGA submitted a fair proposal and low fees. However, staffing difficulties for the new PSA and negative prior work experience with the consultant prompted non- consideration for final selection. See attachment"Survey Services Evaluation Summary"for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The selection of three surveying firms to provide services to the District may be changed. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Survey Services Evaluation Summary Ma:lc G:Wadb`apeM•EoaE Age Reow la MAp a 2epmuWWMM ta(e),SMOLx.a Aa„: mzasa Page 3 Survey Services Evaluation Summary 5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board Bell Bush MDS I Dc ForkM Total Point Score 153 136 135 129 103 Fee Proposal of Most Often Used Services 1 $635 1 $496 $555 $460 $518 Final Selection 1 1 1 2 1 3 G.I"dlawguom 8 CONTFACTSl oils,Survey,ETesling Contracts FY 01.041 urvey\Survey Evaluallon Summary.dw PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TaBe.arrnr. s1vro1 s1231 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number P0001-29 14(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-35BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for an amount not to exceed $70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($350,000 total). SUMMARY Capital projects require extensive electrical acceptance testing for successful completion of the projects. Testing procedures follow the National Electrical Testing Association's (NETA)Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electric Power Distribution Equipment and Systems. Some of the equipment tested includes transformers, circuit breakers, and motors. On past capital projects the prime contractor was generally required to perform electrical testing. The District has decided to modify that approach and work directly with NETA-certified testing firms to accomplish acceptance testing for increased quality assurance. Staff has selected Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro Test Inc. to provide electrical acceptance testing services to the District. The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July 2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. ckgdia�genga�W nyenm Repaultom Boom Ag�ds aepw MIVIem 14(f1. 4IX11 XAM R . Wma Page 1 i The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as- needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the following one-year period. Electrical acceptance testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the proposed numbers by considering average testing hours of past years along with present electrical testing fees and scheduled future capital projects. 01/02 02/03 03104 3-Year Total Power Systems 1 $70,000 $150,000 $175,000 $395,000 Electro Test $70,000 $150,000 1 $175.000 $395,000 Total per Year $140,000 1 $300,000 1 $350,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Electrical testing funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting firms: • Electro-Test Incorporated • Brar Electrical Systems • Power Systems • Applied Engineering Concepts Three consultants responded, and District staff selected two of those firms for recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide electrical testing services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods at District's discretion. G:Wq.NN0 a�0N Aq .ee�=01B WN--ftg-Wllhlm 10)sP3001d5 a« n.WW1 Wme Page 2 Five District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following evaluation factors: • Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point score) • Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score) • Related service experience (point score) • Prior work experience with the consultants • Proposed fees Staff is recommending Electro-Test Incorporated and Power Systems to provide electrical acceptance testing services to the District. Brar Electrical Systems could not provide the required NETA-certified technicians or registered electrical engineers for field personnel, prompting non-consideration for final selection. Power Systems received the highest evaluation point score. Electro-Test Incorporated received a lower evaluation score on their proposal. However, after interviewing the firm and considering several years of positive prior work experience with the consultant, District staff decided to select the company. See attachment "Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary"for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The selection of two electrical testing firms to provide services to the District may be changed CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary MBAc B"NWWEa�AgO6t�SUGOI BMW A9WM Be[gt4 IMMe 14(1. O135.E= a"„x„ � Page 3 Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary 5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board Electro-Test Power Systems Bmr Electric Total Point Score 47 89 61 Fee Proposal (Summation of Hourly Rates) 1 $3 741 1 $3 665 $3,563 Final Selection 1 2 1 1 G:xp.dtaletgVOBS a CONTRACTS1SdIs,Sumy,E-TWl g Contracts FY 01.041Electrlcal Testing Services Evaluation Summery.tloe PDC COMMITTEE Meetingoate Toea.orwr. s/Riot siz iol AGENDA REPORT item Number Item 601 Orange County sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,810,056.56, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of$90,780, increasing the total contract amount to$8,900,836.56 and (3) Accept Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Change Order No. 8 includes 3 items of added work and one credit item to Contract No. 3-38-1. There is a 27 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Change Order No. 9 is for the adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date May 18, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date November 27, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 9 Current Contract Completion Date March 4, 2001 Actual Completion Date February 5, 2001 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $8,363,796.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 422,538.56 This Change (CO No. 8) (add) $ 23,722.00 This Change (CO No. 9) (add) $ 90,780.00 Change Orders to Date $ 537,040.56 Percentage Increase to Date 6.42% Final Contract Price $8,900,836.56 weaawaunwe mamaenea,Roam R,e O Re.ft o019oam 1 a�at cm Reonee: B12098 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Section 8, Page 27) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Tables ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 3-38-1, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, includes the installation of 15,933 feet of sewer pipe, manholes, and appurtenant facilities in the City of Buena Park, and along the Caltrans right-of- way in Beach Boulevard. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded on April 28, 1999 to Fleming Engineering, inc. The contract is now complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 8 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Shoring and excavation for two $ 15,120 0 Other sewer lateral bores. 2 Delays attributed to bypass $ 21,598 15 Other anoroval 3 Compensible delay costs $ 20,574 0 Changed associated with CO No. 7 Condition 4 Credit for realignment on $(33,570) 10 Changed Beach Boulevard Condition 6 Time extension for inclement $ 0 2 Other weather Total Change Order No. 8 1 $ 23,722 1 27 The following summarizes Change Order No. 9 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Adjustment of Engineer's $90,780 0 Other Quantities Total Change Order No. 9 $90,780 0 ALTERNATIVES None WeaNCalal\p EaraBa^Ca\Bowrtl ABe^tla Repa^srN01 Bantl AgenEa ReOo^s`L501\Item Id(81.3361 Eps Reasetl'. fl209B Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIA was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was fled on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 8 4. Change Order No. 9 BP:lc vve.mmviwy.ev,�ma.eoamapnee neoon»aoi eam nemaa neemeawix.,,,ialal Me ldc +� a Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH I CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 -p ­ w AUTHORIZED AUTHO ' E E E �L WN Project Development $20,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6.000.00 $6,000.00 $5.934.00 99% Studies/PenlUing $10,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.0 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $23,973.00 100% Consultant PSA $300,000.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $181.938.00 96% Design Staff $153,000.00 $276.000.00 $276,000.00 $276.000.00 $276.000.00 $260.491.001 94% Constmction Contract $4,308,000.00 $8,786.334.56 $114.502.00 $8.900,836.56 $8.786.334.56 $114,502.00 $8,900,836.56 $8,786,230.001 99% Construction Administration $100.000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $241.304.001 73% Construdon Inspection $120,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $676,700.00 97% Contingency $914.000.00 $376,955.44 -$114.502.00 $282.453.44 PROJECT TOTAL $5,925,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,312,044.56 $114.502.00 $10,426,546.56 $10,176,570.00 98% lReimbumable Costs I 1PROJECT NET 1 $5,925,000,001 $10,689.000.001 1 $10,689,000.001" 1 $10.312.044.661 $114.502.001 $10,426.546.561 $10,176,670.001 —.—.Tl g"dwWnglm"NwntW$ -38-1%udpdablew0.9 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 5/18/99 $ 8,363,796.00 $ 8,363,796.00 560 560 CO NO. 1' 10/20/99 $ 21,475.00 $ 8,385,271.00 0.26 0 560 CO. NO. 2' 12/20/99 $ 46,685.00 $ 8,431,956.00 0.81 7 567 CO. NO. 3' 1/26100 $ 30,830.81 $ 8,462,786.81 1.18 4 571 CO. NO. 4 4126/00 $ 130,622.00 $ 8,593,408.81 2.75 26 597 CO. NO. 5' 07/07/2000 $ - $ 8,593,408.81 2.75 0 597 CO.NO.6" 9M4/00 $ 77.952.00 $ 8,671,360.81 3.68 15 612 CO.NO7 328101 $ 114,973.75 $ 8,786,334.56 5.05 18 630 CO.NO. 8 Pending $ 23,722.00 $ B,810,056.56 5.34 27 657 CO. NO. 9 Pending $ 90,780.00 $ 8,900,836.56 6.42 0 657 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 "Approved by PDC per delegated authoray by Board Resolution 99-23 gAvpdta/englobs and contracts/3-38.1/costatusreport8-9 j Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eloht (8) Date: May 23. 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No, 3.38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Amount of this Change Order(Add) $23 722.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —SHORING AND EXCAVATION FOR TWO SEWER LATERAL BORES This item is reimbursement for installation costs for two sewer lateral bores added to the project by Addendum No. 1. However, the work was not included in the contract Schedule of Prices. The added work was for two additional 8-inch sewer laterals installed in 24-inch steel casings under Beach Boulevard at Station Nos. 78+80 and 79+20. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,120.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TI EM 2—DELAYS ATTRIBUTED TO BYPASS APPROVAL This item is for extra labor, equipment, and overhead costs for standby time between June 14, 2000 to June 28, 2000. District Staff required that additional details be provided for all bypass plans to be used for the balance of the project. The details required that the Contractor develop a spill contingency plan, investigate the flow conditions in the existing trunk sewers, and confirm the duration of low and high flow periods. This item does not include any direct costs for development and implementation of bypass plans, but is exclusively for delay costs. The Contractor was not allowed to continue work until a comprehensive bypass plan was submitted and approved. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 47). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,598.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92723.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eight (8) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering ITEM 3—COMPENSIBLE DELAY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 A general note in Change Order No. 7 stipulated that "all change order items which include time extensions, may be adjusted for compensible delay costs in a future change order. Change Order No. 7 included eight items with a total time extension of 18 calendar days. During Change Order No. 8 negotiations, it was determined that the aforementioned days should be categorized as excusable compensable delays. District Staff negotiated a daily-extended field site overhead rate and applied it to the subject 18 calendar days. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact No.47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,574.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 -CREDIT FOR REALIGNMENT ON BEACH BOULEVARD The existing contract alignment, located in the outside No. 3lane represented a potential public safety problem. Caltrans expressed their concems with equipment movement encroaching into the No. 2 lane during mainline construction. District Staff and the Design Consultant reevaluated the design alignment between Station Nos. 76+26 and 97+73 and concluded that it would be beneficial to all parties to modify the alignment. Plan Change No. 7 was initiated to move the alignment into the No. 1 fast lane to provide more installation space and maintain Caltran's required safety clearance to the traveling public. In addition, the Contractor would realize cost savings due to the elimination of steel plating or same day base paving, increased productivity due to the added workspace, relocation away from an existing parallel sewer, and elimination of bypass pumping. This item includes ten days of excusable compensible delays, which equals $11,430. As a result, the District negotiated a net credit item with the Contractor. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 7) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($33,570.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.0 No. Eiaht (8) Date: May 23 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering ITEM 5—TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER This item is to adjust the time of completion based on 32-days of inclement weather to date. Total inclement weather days to dale: 32 Calendar Days Contract inclusive weather days: 12 Calendar Days Inclement weather days granted to date: 18 Calendar Days Contract time extension: 2 Calendar Days This item is in compliance with Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 7 of the Construction Agreement. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $23,722.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 27 Calendar Days t Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eight (8) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 27 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 18, 1999 Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 27 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 27 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 97 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 657 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 4, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA Actual Final Completion Date: February 5, 2001 Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 422,538.56 This Change (Add) (DedUGt) $ 23, 722.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,810,056.56 a Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering. Inc. C.0 No. Eight (8) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Enaineerino Board Acceptance Date: May 23, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. Contractor Date J Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Nine (9) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Amount of Change Order(Add) $90,780.00 In accordance with contract provisions the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item No Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 8. V.F. 84-inch ID MH 633 650.00 17.00 $1140.00 $19,380.00 14. L.F. Slurry Fill Abend. Sewer Pipe 4,326 5120.00 794.00 30.00 23,820.00 16. L.F. 8-inch VCP Sewer 100 285.00 185.00 372.00 68,820.00 Subtotal $112,020.00 DEDUCTIONS Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 4. L.F. 39-inch VCP 1990 1975.00 15.00 $ 316 $4,740.00 17. C.Y. Crushed Rock Bedding 0-12" 500 225.00 275.00 20 5,500.00 18. C.Y Crushed Rock Bedding 12-24" 500 0,00 500.00 22 11 000.00 Subtotal $(21,240.00) TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $90.780.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days L Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Flemina Engineering Inc. C.0 No. Nine (9) Date: May 23 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressy granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 18, 1999 Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 27 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 97 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 657 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 4, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA Actual Final Completion Date: February 5, 2001 Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 446,260.56 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 90,780.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,900,836.56 I Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Enaineerina. Inc. C.O No. Nine (9) Date: May 23. 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Board Acceptance Date: May 23, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dae TOBtl.Of Dir. sn7101 5/23/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ PDC01-33 19 h Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT 2, JOB NO. J-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of$2,692 and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $943,308. SUMMARY Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work and one credit item for a design change to Job No. J-66. There is one omission and no errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this job are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date September 18, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date December 31, 2001 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) ($ 2,692.00) Change Orders to Date 0.00 Percentage Decrease to Date (0.28%) Amended Contract Price $ 943,308.00 OIeadWalallndlaWqendsew,d Agerda FeWISWOl B MAgentftp SWW"Ilem N(h)J Wdoc ft.. W. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project is for the construction of a new meter vault and the installation of a new flowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall at Plant No. 2. Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Urbantec Engineers, Inc on June 28, 2000. The contract is now 4% complete. The completed work includes excavation and relocation of a six-inch and a four-inch gas lines and additional work as described in Item 1 of this Change Order. The following summarizes Change Order No. 1 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Relocate Gas Lines $7.108 0 Omission 2 Install Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Per ($9,800) 290 Design Change Revised Drawings Total Change Order No. 1 ($2,692.00 290 Item No. 2 is for costs to install the flowmeter per the revised design. During construction, unknown subsurface soil conditions combined with the review of shoring, pipe support, and dewatering submittals revealed concerns of potential settlement to the adjacent standby oulfall pipe. Due to the critical nature of this project and the serious consequences of a failure to the District's main effluent discharge pipe, staff hired a team of experts to review the contractors methods of construction. The team consisted of Engineers familiar with the original oulfall installation, Geotechnical and Structural Engineers and a Construction consultant. The review team along with District staff, reviewed the contractor's procedures for dewatering, shoring, and temporary pipe supports for the 120-inch pipe and concluded that there was a potential for the adjacent standby-ouffall pipe to settle significantly during construction of this project due to the existing soils and groundwater conditions. The standby outfall pipe bedding had changed significantly since its original installation due to continual ocean tidal actions. G radr dWbgendraBoard Agenda ReMddV00i Board Agenda RedraaW W IDiem Ngh),J£fi.eoc Reward: .,2.B Page 2 r Since both outfall pipelines are critical to District's operations, staff decided to redesign the entire structure to minimize risk. The redesign eliminated the need to excavate below the main outfall pipe and reconfigured the entire access structure. The decision to discontinue construction of design and to redesign the facility was discussed with the PDC in the April 2001 meeting. Summary of Change Order No. 1, Item No.2 Costs Description Costs Work Completed to Date (Relocation of Gas Lines) $ 38,000 Total Contractor's Costs for Redesigned $898,200 Work* Total Cost $936 200 Original Contract Amount $946,000 Net Credit $9,800 Costs for work completed to date includes relocation of gas lines as required in the original contract, but does not include costs for the redesigned work. 'Breakdown of the Contractor's total cost for the redesigned work is as follows: Redesigned Work $809,200 Submittal Preparation Costs for Original Design $ 36,000 Equipment Rental Loss $ 25,000 Contractor's Office and Field Overhead ( 290 Days) $ 28,000 Total contractor's costs for the redesigned work $898,200 The Engineer's estimate for the redesign is $ 742,300 and does not include costs for submittal preparation, equipment rental loss, and contractor's office and field overhead. ALTERNATIVES The alternative of terminating the existing contract and rebidding the new design was discussed with the PDC in April 2001 and staff was directed to proceed with the execution of a change order to the existing contract for the redesigned work. Terminate Contract and Rebid Description Cost Work Completed to Date $ 38,000 Termination Costs" $ 156,440 In-house staff labor and misc. costs to rebid the project $ 8,000 Estimated Low Bid En insei's Estimate $ 742,300 Total Cost $944 740.00 Original Contract Amount $ 946,000 G:W.wawnm,ew,eAg. A.w =,Bova AWN fto MIV.14,j e.e 'a,.w:amne Page 3 r Net Credit $ 1,260 v "Breakdown of the termination costs is as follows: Mobilization and Demobilization Costs $ 47,300 Bonds and Insurance Costs $ 39,840 Overhead and Profit $ 33,300 Submittal Preparation Costs for Original Design $ 36,000 Total $156,440 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm G:Mp A.".d.�MMdnda Reµhn=lB M AMde lieporlYMM\Ilem 14(h).JE .A ad„W. Wrz Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 .. ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOR12ED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE _REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 45.000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 5 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 57,200 $ 82,200 $ 82,200 $ 82,200 $ 82.200 $ 63,000 77% Construction Contract $ 514.000 $ 946.000 $ - $ 946,000 $ 946,000 $ (2,692) $ 943,308 $ 38,000 4% Construction(Other) $ 27,000 $ 27.000 $ - $ 27.000 $ 27.000 $ - $ 27,000 $ 24,000 89% r Construction Staff $ 135,700 $ 135,700 $ - $ 135,700 $ 135,700 $ - $ 135,700 $ 85.000 63% Contingency $ 145,100 $ 120,100 $ - $ 120,100 $ TOTAL 1 $ 924,000 1 $ 1,356,000 $ - $ 1,356,000 .' $ 1,235,900 $ (2,692) $ 1,233.208 $ 255,000 1 21 GAw,dlabN%JOBB a CONTRACTSb66%Comladion Menepemanl File.%Che *0M.MjC0181T.A.101sWt. CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TIME TAO'DATE CONTRACT 06/28/2000 $ 946,000 $ 946,000 180 180 CO NO. 1 Pending $ (2,692) $ 948,308 -028% 29.0 470 . GM dMB QIJOBS 6 CONTMCT�m wn Mvnepumnl F,W.%CMnq 0rdvrsgC0I SMNS b xlg6 lI Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2 Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Ad9)(Deduct) $2( 692.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - RELOCATE GAS LINES This item is for labor, material, and equipment to relocate an additional 60 feet of six-inch and four-inch gas lines. During construction, soil borings revealed gravel below the existing 120-inch pipe. The presence of gravel below the pipe was not shown on the contract drawings. Based on this new information, it was decided to extend the limits of the structure's excavation to ensure proper support of the 120-inch pipe during construction. Therefore additional lengths of gas lines had to be relocated to accommodate the increase in excavation limits. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 1 and Urbantec's Letter Dated October 6, 2000. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,108.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - INSTALL OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER PER REVISED DRAWINGS This item includes costs to install the outfall Fowmeter per the revised drawings issued by the District. During the construction phase of this project, unknown sub surface soils conditions combined with the review of shoring, temporary pipe supports, and dewatering submittals revealed concerns of potential settlement to the adjacent standby outfall pipe. On December 22, 2000 the contractor was directed to stop work to enable the District to reevaluate the unknown subsurface conditions. A redesign was completed by the District and issued to the contractor as Plan Change No. 1. This change order item includes deletion of work not completed in the original contract, addition of the new redesign work, and costs due to delays. Change Order Item Summary: Original Contract Work Not Completed $908.000.00 Redesign Costs (Plan Change No. 1) $898,200.00 Net Credit $ (9,800.00) Page 2 of 4 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers This change order item is on the critical path of this project and a time extension of 290 days is necessary for the District to evaluate the contractor's shop drawings, redesign the project, and negotiate change order costs with the contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2a of the General Provisions. Reference Plan Change No. 1 and Urbantec's Letter Dated March 28, 2001. CREDIT FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($9,800.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 290 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($2,692.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 290 Calendar Days f Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1) Date: May 23, 2001 - Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 290 day extension of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 290 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 290 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 470 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 31, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (2,692.00) Amended Contract Price $ 943.308.00 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1) Date: May 23, 2001 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: May 23, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. Contractor Date GBwp.dta\engUOBS&CONTRACTSU-66\Construction Management Files\Change 0ndws\C01 5-23-01.doc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dare To Btl.or Dir. 5/17/01 5/23/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCOL-34 14(I) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kelly Lew, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER PROTECTION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 11-14R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Establish a budget of$144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection Project, Contract No. 11-14R. SUMMARY The Newland Street Interceptor Sewer was built in 1981. The sewer consists of a 48-inch pipe crossing under the Huntington Beach Channel. The County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department(PFRD) owns the right-of-way and prior rights to the Huntington Beach Channel. PFRD is proceeding to widen and deepen this channel. This construction project requires that Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) construct a bridge-type concrete encasement to protect the existing sewer pipe. The proposed sewer protection project has an estimated cost of$144,000. PFRD will design the sewer protection plans and specifications and will add them to their bid package. PFRD will administer both projects in one construction contract. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection, Contract No. 11-14R is $144,000. Authorization of$6,000 for project development, $1,000 for studies/permitting, and $12,000 for design staff is being requested. This project was not known at the time the FY2000/01 budget was finalized. The requested authorization will allow OCSD staff personnel to monitor the construction of the job by PFRD. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ` ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The project is not currently budgeted. This budget request will allow for the protection of the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer where it crosses the Huntington Beach Channel. This budget request includes $6,000 for project development, $1,000 for studies/permitting, $12,000 for design staff, $60,000 for a construction contract, $26,000 for construction administration, $21,000 for construction inspection, and $18,000 for project contingencies. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) is preparing a Reimbursement Agreement for OCSD to reimburse PFRD for the construction of this project. PFRD has prior rights to the land where the existing flood control channel resides. OCSD has an easement and license agreement from PFRD to operate and maintain the sewer line in PFRD right-of-way. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives for this sewer protection work. By coordinating the two projects together with each other, there will be less inconvenience and cost to the public. CEQA FINDINGS PFRD is handling the CEQA documentation for this project. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table KNL:jak G:\wp.dta\agenda0oard Agenda Repor1s0001 Board Agenda Reports\0501\Item 14@.11.14R.doc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Newland Street Sewer Protection CONTRACT NO. 11.14R ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED rPROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTMASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 6.000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 0% Studies/Permitting $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1.000 $ 1,000 0% Consultant PSA 0% Design Staff $ 12,000r$ 26.000 00 $ 12000 $ 72,000 0% Construction Contract $ 60,00000 0% Construction Administration $ 26,000 0% Construction Ins eclion $ 21,00000 0% Contin enc $ 18.00000 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ - $ - $ 144,000 $ 144,000 $ - $ 19,000 1 $ 19,000 1 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ - $ - $ 144,000 1 $ 144.000 1 $ - $ 19,000 1 $ 19,000 1 $ 0% g0wp dta%eng02atnal,aye\t 1-14nl 1.14r Budget Table Form Revised Oct.4,2000 `w DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, May 9, 2001, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 9, 2001 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT: Shirley McCracken, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Mark Leyes,Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Shawn Boyd Bob Doter, Director of Operations & John M. Gullixson Maintenance Roy Moore Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Joy L. Neugebauer Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jerry Sigler Jeff Reed, Human Resources Supervisor James W. Silva Mike White, Controller North Eckenrode, Board Chair Greg Mathews,Asst.to the General Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Arosteguy Chuck Lee OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Flanagan Richard Castillon Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Mark Esquer Steve Filarsky Jon Thomsic Toby Weissert Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the April 11, 2001 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Director Jerry Sigler abstained. J Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 May 9, 2001 (S) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson reported on ocean discharge issues and the possible impacts of changing the level of treatment to the District's wastewater. Tom Flanagan and Lisa Arosteguy gave a brief presentation on the Leadership Training Program and its goals for the District's management team. A presentation was then given by Greg Mathews and Chuck Lee on the SPMT PBECC (Performance Based Evaluation and Compensation Committee), outlining the philosophical approach the committee had developed and requested guidance and confirmation their approach was in line with what the Board of Directors wanted. Directors requested the committee make a presentation when additional details are available. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance referred the Directors to a hand-out outlining the various insurance policies currently in effect. He briefly reported on the earthquake insurance program and asked for Directors'Input in the consideration of canceling the program for next year. A full report would be made to the FAHR Committee members in June. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources was not present. (9) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager, Lisa Lawson, reported on outreach activities the District has been involved with. The District held its first open house on May Vh, in conjunction with the Orange County Water District and the Municipal Water District of Orange County, and had approximately 300 people attending throughout the day. The District also had a booth at the annual Children's Drinking Water Festival. Ms. Lawson then advised she would be attending all committee meetings through the summer due to the ocean discharge Issues. She reported that a public opinion research telephone survey would be conducted,which would assist in developing the education to be Included in the communication outreach. She also requested Directors to advise staff if they know of any group that might be interested in teaming about ocean discharge issues. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. V Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 May 9, 2001 (17) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:37 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1)and (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. At 7:35 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. FAHR01-25: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2001. b. FAHR01-26: Receive and file Certificate of Participation(COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR01-27: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of April 26, 2001. d. FAHR01-28: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive, file and approve the Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2001. e. FAHR01-29: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2001. I. FAHR01-30: Recommend to the Board of Directors to renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15,2001 to May 15. 2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $75,724. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR01-30: Not used b. FAHR01-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-15,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05,OCSD-06, OCSD-11. and OCSD-13. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 May 9, 2001 C. FAHR01-32 Recommend to the Board of Directors to Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01- , Directing the County Tax Collection-Treasurer to include Sanitary Sewer Charges on the 2001-02 Property Tax Bills. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 13, 2001 at 5 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. yle FAHR Committee Secr ary G:W AabpaMatMWARRMMW1 MMWea10WJ FMRMIN0. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Neebng Dare Toed.Gr Dir. 05/09/01 05/23/01 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number FAHROI-25 15(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of April 2001. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies' portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Gl. dm agenda\Boom Ayeam Repp 001 eomd Agmda Rega SOWIIIam 15(00 e Rey: d: 812M9 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION !• Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts April 30,2001 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAW $28,468,891 5.8 Union Bank Checking Account 392,451 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,173,000 4.7 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 34,662,767 5.7 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 378,529,266 5.9 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,761 5.8 Debt Servica Reserves w/rrustees 35,809,651 5.9 Petry Cash 8,000 N/A TOTAL 3479.045.Z8Z ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC GWq.d..,Id.TAHMFAHR IVWI An.ftp ,FAHROI-25 drc Re.. .. Page 2 ReportPrepared by Finance, 5/8/01, 10:50 AM Monthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances IIIIIIIIiI nwuw IIIIIIIIII� Nov, 00 ■ ..... ..... ..... . . . : - C3 Bank . M Dist 11 Bond Fund MONTHLY REPORT " ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2001) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $35,205,334 Mellon $35,205,538 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $35,161,163 • Mellon $35,171,193 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 036 Of Index: 020 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ithloss)of 1%Chane: $126,739 15.IA REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repro: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 36% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avera a Ptxtfollo Credit Quality: "AA+' 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.46 0.38 3 Months: 1.40 1.26 12 Months: 6.83 5.93 Year-to-Date: 2.09 1.79 Commentary Interest rates at the chart-end of the yield curve declined during the month(3-mon0s T-Bills down 40 basis points to 3.88%),while the long<nd posted increases(30-year Treasuries op 34 basis points m 5.7W.). The Liquid portfolio outperfomted the benchmark by 8 basis point for the month,and by 30 basis points ysart -dau. PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper aral short-term rotes enhanced remms. cavpm5n„u:wwnwlr...t.y.syw,aigmoa,rgeearrme MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ended 30 April 1001) Long-Term Operating Mania(103) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Curren Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $383,328,345 • Mellon $383,488,895 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $374,078,471 • Mellon $376,523,830 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.16 Of Index: 2.29 15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $8,279,892 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Ponfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 24% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.17 0.06 3 Months: 1.67 1.77 12 Months: 10.42 10.92 Year-to-Date: 2.84 3.24 Commentary • Three-month yields decreased far the month(90-day T-Bills down 40 basis points to 3.880t)while longer maturities increased(51ear Treasury Notes up 33 basis points to 4.88%). • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 1 basis point for the month,but lagged the benchmark by 40 buts points year-to-date. • PIMCO's near-index duration was neutral for performance. • A broader-than-index maturity mix had a slightly negative impact on performance as yields rose on longer maturity holdings. • An undesweight allocation to Treasuries contributed to returns u the Treasury sector was the worst performing bond sector during the month. • Holdings ofmmlgage-backed securities were positive for performance as this sector omperformed Treasuries on an absolute and duration-adjusted basis. • An underweight allocation to the corporate sector detracted from retums as corporates outperformed Treasuries on an absolute and duration-adjusted basis. a+.pem5n�rvsotwuxtneannyn�.wmsaaly.or.arra: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-APR-2001 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 4,940,531.75 4.940.531.75 14.03% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 4,646,274.61 4,646,274.61 13.20% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 2,935,250.00 2,935,250.00 8.34% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 74,209.44 74,208.44 0.21% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 12,596,264.80 12,596,264.90 35.78% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 12,596,264.80 12,393364.86 35.781/6 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 3,875,257.81 3,868,296.00 10.99% -6,971.81 U.S.AGENCIES 7,937,845.57 7,946,989.98 22.57% 9,144.41 BANKING&FINANCE 9,020,241.70 9,045,229.80 25.69% 24,999.10 INDUSTRIAL 202,730.00 202,644.00 0.58% -86.00 UTILITY.TELEPHONE 996,082.20 1,003,352.70 2.85% 7,270.50 TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,032,157.28 22,066,502.48 62.68% 34,345.20 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES � .032, 2.157.18 6S-a34,345.IU OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 542,770.50 542,770.50 1.54% 0.00 TOTAL 542,770.50 542,770.50 1.54% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS ----------T.9 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 35,171,192.58 35,205,537.78 100.00% 34.34520 O&May-2001 10.16:19 F"cu0w Wmkbo mh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: LSD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2001 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 56,902.50 56,802.50 0,01% 0.00 PAYABLES -30,094,912.50 -30,094,812.50 -7.86% 0.00 TOTAL -30,038,010.00 -30,038,010.00 .7.84% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 24,850,130.84 24,850,130.84 6.49% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 235,706.69 235,706.69 0.06% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 25,095,837.53 25,085,837.53 6.55% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �, 79'L74 �435, ,172A7 --1.29% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 19,301,261.72 19,432,568.00 5.07% 131,306.28 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 39,605,929.00 41,472,608.37 10.83% 1,866,679.37 U.S.AGENCIES 146,109,334.48 150,332,064.00 39.26% 4,222,729.52 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 35,875,044.35 35,950,065.57 9.39% 75,021.22 ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 12,054,619.85 12,215,193.16 3.19% 160,373.31 FHLMC POOLS 7,949,732.38 7,925,530.43 2.07% -24,201.95 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,546,720.09 4,592,261.55 1,20% 45,541.46 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,000,000.00 3,050,700.00 0.80% 50,700.00 ABS:HOME EQUITY 25,355.40 25,371.12 0.01% 15.72 BANKING&FINANCE 65,110,657.75 65,325,177.75 17.06% 214,520.00 INDUSTRIAL 11,995,436.00 11,925,073.00 3.11% 29,637.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,554,725.00 3.80% -67,295.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,306,789.00 1.91% 6,789.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,595,550.00 1.98% 98,295.00 HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,785,218.25 0.47% 154,744.20 TOTAL UNITED STATES 376,523,830.07 383,488,895.20 100.14% 6,965,065.13 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2 ,830.07 393,498,995.26 100.14% 08-May-2001 10:17:42 aeculNe Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSFV7522202 30-APR-2001 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,420,193.76 4,420,193.76 1.15% 0.00 TOTAL 4,420,193,76 4,420,193.76 1,15% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,420,193.76 4,420,193.79 5.9 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 375,991,851,36 382,956,916.49 100.00% 6,965,065.13 08-Map1001 1037,42 Emcuaw Wmkbsacb. YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/01 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIN¢ , 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ------___- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 74,208.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.132 AAA 100.000 74,208.44 .58 996085247 AAA 74,208.44 .21 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MM ASSN DISCOUNT 4.53E .000 P-1 97.842 2,935,250.00 23.30 313589LY7 MAT 09/20/2001 A-1+ 2,935,250.00 8.47 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN MTG (RB) DISC 4.635 .000 P-1 90.817 2,271,604.00 19.92 31339REN3 MAT O7/19/2001 A-1+ 2,371,604.00 6.84 600,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 4.640 .000 P-1 98.054 588,321.62 4.67 63743CV03 08/24/2001 588,321.67 1.90 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN MTG (AE( DISC 4.661 .000 P-1 99.699 2,274,670.62 18.05 31339REM5 MAT 06/21/2001 A-1+ 2,214,600.61 6.56 912,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 4.039 .000 P-1 99.217 805,639.33 6.39 26354AT83 06/09/2001 905,639.33 2.32 900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 4.972 .000 ➢-1 99.560 096,040.00 7.11 02225ASJ2 05/18/2001 896,040.00 2.59 900,000.00 DISNEY MALT CO DISC 5.010 .000 99.295 880,155.00 6.9B 2546ROV72 08/07/2001 880,155.00 2.54 900,000.00 VENISON ULORL POD DISC 5.215 .000 98.755 888,I98.75 3.05 92344ASM2 05/21/2001 888,798.75 2.56 900,000.00 GENERAL EXEC CAP DISC 5.452 .000 P-1 90.953 881,577.00 6.99 36959HT64 06/06/2001 891,577.D0 2.54 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.619 .040 12,596,264.00 100.00 12,596,264.80 36.33 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 250,000.00 GENERAL MTR6 MTN BTR 00555 .000 4.442 A2 99.964 249,260.00 1.13 30042MECB FLTC RT O1/28/2002 DD O1/26/00 A 249,910.00 .72 3,900,000.00 U S TREASURY MOTES 4.155 7.368 AAA 101.797 3,875,257.81 17.53 912827D25 07.5001 11/15/2001 DD 11/13/91 AAA 3,860,286.00 11.16 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 MSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01 DISTRICW� LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.56.54 FAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOED: LN BE CONS BDS 4.246 6.634 AAA 101.750 4,278,414.00 19.36 3133M WI 6.150E 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 4,273,500.00 12.33 200,000.00 FEDERAL MOVE LN BK CONS BOB 4.321 6.201 AAA 100.953 201,878.00 .91 3133MIS34 6.260E 10/29/2002 DD 10/29/97 AAA 201,906.00 .58 100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS BUS 4.376 2.024 AAA 101.437 101,525.00 .45 3133MBSU2 7.125% 11/15/2001 DO 05/11/00 AAA 101.430.00 .29 250,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN USES 4.665 6.523 AAA 101.562 253,742.50 1.15 31359MFF5 6.625E 01/15/2002 DO 1/14/2000 AAA 253,905.00 .03 249,D00.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS DEBS 4.6I0 5.169 AAA 100.609 248,044.81 1.12 313311AF5 5.200E 02/01/2002 DO 02/D1/01 AAA 248,504.23 .72 125,000.00 FED HONE LN BIG CORP DEB 4.676 I.620 AAA 101.703 127,208.75 .53 313400HV1 7.750% 11/07/2001 DO 11/07/91 AAA 127,128.75 .37 200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEB 4.840 2.332 AAA 102.297 204,660.00 .92 3135863E1 7.500% 02/11/2002 DO 2/10/92 AAA 204,594.00 .59 150,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LN BE CONS BUB 4.840 6.854 AAA 102.125 152,959.50 .69 3133MATE9 7% 02/25/2002 DO 02/25/2000 AAA . 153,197.50 .44 150,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN MTN 4.840 6.203 AAA 101.406 151,902.00 .68 31364CWL8 6.290% 02/11/2002 OD 02/11/97 AAA 152,109.00 .44 100,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CONS BDS 4.944 4.859 AAA 100.328 95,936.00 .45 3133N2DR4 4.825E 01/22/1002 DD 01/20/99 AAA 100,328.00 .29 500,000.00 OMAC MTN 5.018 5.328 A2 100.407 501,560.00 2.27 37042WFS 5.350E 12/07/2001 OD 12/07/98 A 502,035.00 1.45 455,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 5.142 5.488 AAA 100.219 455,868.45 2.06 3133M53C3 5.500E 08/13/2001 DD 08/13/90 AAA 455,996.45 1.32 300,000.00 GMAC MTM 5.199 5.850 A2 101.026 302,148.00 1.33 32042WNWI 5.910E 03/11/2002 OD 03/10/99 A 303,078.00 .87 500.000.OD HILLER FINL INC SR NTS 5.519 6.459 A3 100.670 503,020.00 2.28 423328BD4 6.500E 11/01/2001 DD 11/04/96 A- 503.350.OD 1.45 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 000642 $.54I 5.25E A3 99.840 438,593.20 1.99 1712OW36 5.250E 10/22/2001 DO 10/22/98 A- 439,296.00 1.27 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 MSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01 DIBTMICTs LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE i TOTAL 400.000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BK CONS BUS 5.756 4.957 AAA 100.365 397,312.00 1.81 3133M6R67 4.975% 11/23/1001 DO 11/23/99 AAA 401,460.00 1.16 820,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS BD8 5.985 5.567 AAA 100.234 819,442.00 '3.02 3133MSDS6 5.580% 08/17/2001 DO 08/17/98 AAA 821,918.80 2.37 75,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LM BK CONS BUS 5.973 6.456 AAA 100.687 75,271.50 .34 3133MCAE8 6.500% 09/28/2001 DO 09/28/00 AAA 75,515.25 .22 500,000.00 IBM CA CORP MEN ITS 00016 6.560 6.569 Al 101.078 500,268.50 2.29 44922YAR9 6.640% 10/29/2001 DO 10/29/99 A+ SO5.390.00 1.46 100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BIG CORD DEBS 6.576 6.408 AAA 100.500 99,092.00 .45 3134AOSP3 6.440% 08/21/2001 DO DB/21/96 AAA 100,500.00 .29 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 6.830 6.959 Al 100.593 700,707.00 3.19 00206HL44 7.000% 08/15/2001 OD 00/20/99 A. 704,151.00 2.03 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 6.044 0.878 A2 101.377 448,219.20 2.02 345330AY6 9.000% 09/15/2001 DO 09/15/91 A 446.058.9D 1.29 1,002,000.00 WONLDCOM INC SR NTS 6.845 6.117 A3 100.135 996,002.20 4.54 9815SKAF9 6.125% 00/15/2001 DO 00/11/98 BBB+ 1,003,352.70 2.89 1,000,000.00 MANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS 6.867 6.327 A3 100.760 995,534.00 4.56 893502BS2 6.375% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/96 A- 1,007,600.00 2.91 200,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.943 5.724 A3 100.453 197,772.00 .91 423338KJO 5.750% D9/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 200,906.00 .58 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 6.960 8.389 A3 101.322 202.130.DD .91 122014AD5 8.500% 10/01/2001 DO 10/17/91 A- 202,644.00 .58 250,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN COMP NEW SUB 6.984 9.307 Al 100.734 254,730.00 1.14 16161MLI 9.375% 07/01/2001 DO 07/01/89 A+ 251,835.00 .73 275,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE CONS BUS 7.058 5.140 AAA 100.000 270,789.06 1.24 3133MGEA2 5.140% 05/02/2001 DO 11/02/90 AAA 275,000.00 .79 500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORP HIM 100081 7.316 6.721 A3 100.428 496,495.00 2.20 06670QDJ4 6.750% 08/09/2001 DO 08/09/96 BBB+ 502.140.00 1.45 1,000.000.D0 ARISTAR INC SR HT 0.346 7.725 A3 100.329 1,003,830.00 4.54 040420ATS 7.350% 06/15/2001 DD 07/07/94 A- 1,003,290.00 2.89 YLINAA . YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 MSP07511102 20D1/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY RACKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPH SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,000,000.00 FLEET/NORSTAR FINL CROUP INC 7.365 9.844 A3 100.560 1,024,020.00 4.55 339010ADS 9.9006 06/15/2001 DO D6/24/91 A- 1,005,680.00 2.10 420,000.00 BANMAMERZCA CORP HR NY 7.441 6.650 AA2 100.000 417,034.80 1.90 06605OCG2 6.650% 05/01/2001 DD 05/01/96 A+ 420,000.00 1.21 1,000,000.00 DONALDEON LUMIN 6 TEN TR00011 7.530 6.207 Al 100.051 987,060.00 4.53 25766CAL8 6.110% 05/15/2001 DO 05/27/98 A- 1,000,510.00 2.99 ________ _______ ----------------- ____----- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.730 6.672 22,032,157.20 100.00 22,066,502.48 63.66 ________ _______ ----------------- _________ WTAL 4.714 5.717 34,628,422.08 100.00 34,662,767.29 100.00 .....um000.... ........ YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 5 OCSF07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/01 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.56.54 =.=................v==.=ay...====v......=.v..===......_______._............====a.........====vv==.....v=............... PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HAREET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,1DO,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.060 1,087,465.50 4.33 07588RTL9 06/20/2001 1,087,465.50 .27 1,400,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 97.960 1,371,440.00 5.46 03588RUH6 07/17/2001 1,371,440.00 .34 1,100,000.00 DISNEY HALT CO DISC .000 .000 90.937 1,089,305.78 4.33 2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 1,088,305.78 .27 200,000.00 DISNEY HALT CO DISC .000 .000 97.795 195,590.00 .73 2546ROV72 08/07/2001 195,590.00 .05 230,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.865 227,388.73 .90 26354ASA3 05/10/2001 227,308.73 .06 2,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.405 2,558,530.00 10.19 369590T64 06/06/20DI 2,558,530.00 .63 3,700,000.00 GNAC DISC .000 .ODO P-1 90.664 3,650,551.56 14.55 37042=7 06/12/20DI 3,650,552.56 .89 1,200,000.00 GOLDHAN SACHS LP DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.715 1,184,561.33 4.72 38142TVH5 08/17/2001 1,184,501.33 .29 2,SOO,ODO.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC .000 .ODO P-1 99.405 2,487,122.22 9.91 63743CAR5 05/25/2001 2,487,122.22 .61 2,700,000.00 VERI8ON GLOBAL FOG DISC .000 .000 98.965 2,672,047.82 10.65 92344ASG5 05/16/2001 2,6]2,D4].82 .65 600,000.00 VERIEON GLOBL FOG DISC .000 .000 98.755 592,532.50 2.36 92344ASN2 05/21/2001 592,532.50 .15 235,706.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE HUNT .000 4.132 AAA 100.000 235,706.69 .93 996085247 AAA 235,706.65 .06 7,268,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.371 .ODD P-1 98.313 7,145,413.07 28.48 63743CSO7 05/24/2001 7,145,413.07 1.75 600,000.00 CAHPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.420 .000 P-1 98.194 589,162.33 2.34 13443ASX4 05/31/2001 589,162.33 .14 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSM7522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 30.56.54 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS .508 .019 25,005,837.53 100.00 25,005,837.53 6.16 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MM .000 6.553 AAA 99.188 16,415,000.00 3.75 OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2031 AAA 14,302,260.00 3.52 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MW .000 7.736 ARE 103.406 14,458,437.50 3.77 OIN000658 8.0008 05/15/2031 AAA 14,476,840.00 3.54 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC GLOBAL NT .000 4.681 A2 100.156 $99,721.00 .23 073902BQO FLTG RT O8/01/2002 DD 07/29/99 A 901,404.00 .22 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO .000 7.662 AAA 97.991 2,221,375.00 .30 21HO72650 7.5001 05/20/2031 AAA 1,174,687.50 .29 4,500,000.00 DAIMLER CHRYSLER NA CORD NY .000 5.814 A3 99.593 4,491,345.00 1.16 233835AM9 MIS RT 12/16/2002 DD 12/15/00 A- 4,481,685.00 1.10 927,156.28 FRLMC GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 7.406 AAA 101.268 950,624.92 .24 3128DBMA2 7.500E 10/01/2004 DD 03/UI/99 AAA 938,912.62 .23 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL MORE IN BE CONS BDS .000 6.672 AAA 106.797 7,997,625.00 2.00 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 8,009,775.00 1.96 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BE CONS BUS .000 7.426 AAA 102.609 20,465,937.50 5.35 3133MASN2 7.620% 03/08/2005 DD 03/08/00 AAA 20,521,800.00 5.02 256,207.75 FELMC GROUP 079-6064 .000 6.299 AAA 101.234 249,962.70 .06 31348SNX3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 259,369.35 .06 4,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL SECS .000 7.185 A2 102.650 4,150,400.00 1.07 345397TS2 7.375% 02/01/2011 DD O1/30/01 A 4,106,000.00 1.00 1,043,100.04 GBMA II POOL /0080395 .000 6.456 AAA 100.688 1,033,647.74 .27 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 1,050,277.37 .26 8,683,417.05 ENNA iI POOL BOSD40EX .000 6.456 AAA 100.688 0,595,226.10 2.27 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 8,743,150.96 2.14 4,200,000.00 SBA GTD DRY PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 6.424 AAA 98.685 4,200,000.00 1.00 03162CW0 6.340% 03/O1/2021 RAN 4,144,770.00 1.01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 0 OCSFO7522202 2001/04/30 RON DATE ' 05/04/01 DISTRICT: TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ___________---- _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- 3,000,000.00 SBA GET) PARTS CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.530 101.690 3,000,000.00 .39 831641DD4 6.640E 02/01/2011 3,050,700.00 .75 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS .000 6.409 AAA 117.016 2,769,004.22 .70 912810DK3 07.500% 11/15/2016 DO 11/15/86 AAA 2,691,360.00 .66 6,109,311.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX RT .000 3.721 AAA 104.125 6,333,484.D9 1.65 9128274YS 3.075% 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,361,326.33 1.56 3.500,000.OD VIRGINIA ELBC 6 FUR OS HER A .000 5.879 A3 90.805 3,487,680.00 .89 920804BUD 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/D1 A- 3,423,175.00 .84 8,559,828.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.015 3.557 AAA 101.906 0,874,235.80 2.39 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 00/15/97 AAA 9,171,364.72 2.24 25,517,350.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.913 3.320 AAA 101.656 24,398,209.11 6.76 9128272M3 3.335% 01/15/2000 DO O1/15/97 Al", 25,939,917.32 6.35 1,917,359.00 MALOMON SMITH BARNEY (NAGS IMF 4.002 3.631 ARE 100.517 1,862,976.55 .50 79549BWI 3.650% 02114/2D02 OD 02/14/97 A 1,927,271.75 .40 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HIM 5.261 6.410 A3 102.031 1,436,920.00 .37 812400MG 6.5404 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,428,434.00 .35 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR EYE 5.650 6.376 AA3 101.938 1,543,215.00 .39 046003BYE 6.5004 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,529,070.00 .37 3,950,000.00 GMAC NEB 5.752 5.618 A2 98.076 3,918,768.50 1.01 310425QV5 FLTG RT 08/10/2003 DO 08/17/90 A 3,874,002.00 .95 1,000,000.00 MI-1 R FINANCIAL INC NEE 5.760 5.224 A3 100.453 9" 030.00 .26 423330JD 5.7508 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 1,004,530.00 .25 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MEN SR 600500 5.I75 4.464 A2 100.001 999,188.90 .26 44181KST4 MID RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,000,010.00 .24 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 5.849 6.492 A3 102.125 3,O73,170.00 .79 8124DQJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,063,750.00 .75 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY 5.881 5.534 Al 99.540 1,992,900.00 .51 066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,990,940.00 .49 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY WITH CARE HER B 5.942 5.105 AAA 91.785 1,630,474.05 .46 64509ERM0 4.050% 07/01/2028 DD 12/01/90 AAA 1,705,218.25 .44 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSF07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/01 DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE : 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT NODDY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOON. YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 15,500,000.00 FEDRRA4 NAIL MSC ASSN DEW 5.963 6.698 AAA 106.375 16,154,410.00 4.29 31359M I 3.1251 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,406,125.00 4.04 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN MTN 5.901 5.803 AAA 100.219 14,955,300.00 3.92 3136402V0 5.820% 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 15,032,050.00 3.68 2,500,000.00 HEARILL LYNCH NOTBS 5.995 6.326 RA3 200.333 2,526,725.00 .65 59018MP4 6.335% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,519,425.00 .62 3,5D0,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.925 AA2 101.274 7,497,255.00 1.90 079867MS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 AAA 7,595,550.00 1.86 3,000,000.00 BALTIHORE GAS 6 RLEC CO 6.011 6.641 AT 101.640 3,038,250.00 .79 059165DN7 6.350% 12/15/2002 DO 12/20/00 A 3,049,200.00 .35 2,000,000.00 SAMEBOSTON CORD SR NTS 6.133 6.055 A2 101.155 1,999,600.00 .52 06605TAL6 6.1251 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 2,023,100.00 .50 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.599 AAA 132.594 12,332,107.50 3.28 912810EG9 00.750% 09/15/2020 DO 08/15/90 AAA 12,596,430.00 3.00 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC HTN ITR006I5 9.154 5.223 A3 99.156 1,499,415.00 .30 171200EBO PLTG AT O0/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 A 1,487,340.00 .36 1,700,000.00 HORGAN STANLEY RATE In 00311 6.180 4.461 RA3 100.093 1,699,517.20 .44 61345ENY3 FLTG RT O1/28/2002 DO O1/27/00 RA- 1,701,581.00 .42 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 6.221 5.402 A2 99.960 1,990,613.60 .52 345397WO FLTG AT O8/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,360.00 .49 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 6.271 5.090 Al 100.068 2,994,300.00 .08 209111CUS PLTG AT 06/15/2002 DO O6/20/97 A+ 3,002,040.00 .33 25,355.40 GREEN THEE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.286 AAA 100.062 25,355.40 .00 3935052Y1 6.2901 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 25,371.12 .01 4,500,000.00 PBDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTH 6.291 6.143 AAA 101.422 4,400,705.00 1.29 31364CEV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAR 4,563,990.00 1.12 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN ITS 00246 6.300 4.619 A3 99.609 3,000,000.00 .79 42333nF3 PLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,988,270.00 .33 3,800,000.00 GENERAL HIM ACCEP 4T'R 00562 6.303 5.523 A2 99.546 3,793,958.00 .98 37042MKD FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/24/00 A 3,782,748.00 .93 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSFO7522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL 2,543,051.00 FNLNC NULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.789 AAA 101.755 2,545,832.09 .60 3133ME95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 AAA 2,583.681.55 .63 2,193,050.76 GNMA GTD URIC TR 2000-9 FN 6.320 5.495 AAA 100.496 2,193,850.76 .57 383304NK9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,204,732.26 .54 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.607 A2 102.171 2,031,960.00 .53 073902AN1 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 2,043,420.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CC GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 5.101 A2 99.265 3,000,000.00 .07 345397SRS FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/0D A 2,939.950.00 .33 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 5.594 A2 99.296 1,992,580.00 .51 345399RVY FLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,985,920.00 .49 22.942.61 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 6.136 AAA 93.156 21,587.71 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AM 22,095.81 .01 73,372.90 GNMA POOL 00506636 6.389 6.196 AAA 92.156 70,026.62 .01 36210YY90 6.ODO4 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 71,674.80 .02 919,754.23 GNMA POOL 40503388 6.389 6.106 AAA 97.156 073,048.00 .23 36210VFSS 6.000% 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 893,596.46 .22 26,303.70 GNMA POOL 40499153 6.309 6.196 AAA 93.156 24,967.96 .00 3621000E5 6.OD08 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 25,555.62 .01 17,453.87 GNNA POOL /0496284 6.390 6.176 AAA 97.156 16,567.54 .00 3621OM351 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 16,957.48 .00 990,056.72 GNMA POOL /0496461 6.390 6.136 AAA 97.156 944,858.52 .22 3621OMQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 864,743.51 .21 244,826.26 GNNA POOL #0491103 6.390 6.196 AAA 97.156 232,393.68 .06 36210 FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 237,863.40 .06 24,975.68 GNNA POOL /0486720 6.390 6.176 AAA 93.156 23.107.39 .00 36210AV96 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 24,265.37 .01 44,307.32 GNNA POOL /0497343 6.390 6.136 AAA 90.156 42,057.34 .01 362IONP45 1.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 43,047.22 .01 43.373.53 GNNA POOL #0469698 6.391 6.136 AAA 99.156 44,967.85 .01 36209EXRO 6.000% 11/15/2028 DO 11/01/90 AAA 46,026.23 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 30 MSP07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIRE 1 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 53,909.75 GUM POOL /0467279 6.391 6.106 AAA 90.156 51,171.20 .01 36209CCQ3 6.000E 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 52,375.59 .01 83,626.65 GUM POOL #0457814 6.391 6.136 AAA 93.156 79,379.98 .02 362080SB3 6.000% 10/15/2029 DD 10/01/98 AAA 81,248.31 .02 860,306.52 GUM POOL 60467286 6.391 6.126 AAA 99.156 816,619.08 .21 36209CCK2 6.000% 10/15/2018 DD 10/01/58 AAA 835,839.40 .20 899,551.46 GUM POOL 00465555 6.392 6.136 AAA 99.156 853,071.11 .22 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD D9/01/98 AAA 873,968.22 .22 34,005.28 GUM POOL #0483452 6.392 6.126 AAA 97.156 32,278.45 .00 36209WBV3 6.000E 09/15/2020 DD D9/U1/98 AAA 33,038.17 .01 890,184.55 GUM POOL 00465546 6.392 6.136 AAA 99.156 844,979.87 .22 36209AET3 6.000E 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AAA 864,867.70 .22 063,508.58 GUM POOL 00468339 6.392 6.196 AAA 92.156 819,658.54 .21 36209DHQO 6.000E 08/15/2020 DO 08/01/98 AAA 830,950.40 .21 46,591.91 GUM POOL #0430057 6.393 6.176 AAA 97.156 44,225.91 .01 36203PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/99 AAA 45,266.84 .01 46,211.80 GUM POOL 10468330 6.393 6.196 AAA 93.156 43,065.10 .01 36209DHF4 6.D0DA 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/90 AAA 44,997.54 .01 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN UK CONS ADS 6.404 6.591 AAA 104.312 29,443,671.00 0.91 3133MBY04 6.805% 08/15/2003 DO 08/07/00 AAA 30,354.392.00 2.43 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.485 AAA 100.229 2,000,888.00 .52 3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AAA 2,004,580.00 .45 2,571,955.33 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.499 6.973 AAA 86.049 2,415,815.39 .53 3133TI7A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,213,141.84 .54 3,600,000.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.507 5.112 A3 100.084 3,598,528.00 .93 423328BKB ELM RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 3,603,024.00 .89 2,000,000.00 SALOMON SB ELUDE MTN 6.625 4.591 AA3 99.960 2.000.QDO.00 .52 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/28/00 A 1.999.360.BQ .49 6,645,311.33 FHLMC GROUP IGS-0426 6.628 6.915 AAA 101.233 6,749,144.76 1.75 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 6,727,248.46 1.45 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCNFO75222D2 2001/04/30 RUN DATE [ 05/04/01 DISTRICTi LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE [ 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,389,737.22 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 6.305 7.273 AAA 101.344 I,42D,137.13 .36 36225CC20 3.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01197 AAA 1,408,415.29 .34 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MID CORP DEBS 6.711 6.207 AAA 100.359 10,323,075.00 2.74 3134AITC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,537,695.00 2.50 2,OOD,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR HT 6.717 6.464 A2 102.490 1,992,280.G0 .53 531948AB0 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,049,800.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.939 6.548 A2 102.326 2,995,080.00 .80 345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO O7/16/99 A 3,069,780.00 .75 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDE 6.377 6.634 AAA 101.750 099,550.00 .23 3133MA0.31 6,750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 915,750.00 .22 5,450,000.00 CIT GAP INC MTN 4SR 00042 6.810 5.205 Al 99.718 5,450,000.00 1.41 12560PBT3 FLTG RT 09/13/2002 DO 09/01/00 A9 5,434,631.00 1.33 2,SOD,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LEE INC NT 6.866 6.671 A3 ID2.609 2,498,400.00 .66 22233UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,565,225.00 .63 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW MT 6.960 5.063 A2 100.093 7,300,000.00 1.90 682680AJ2 FLTG AT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,306,789.00 1.39 989,224.25 GNMA II POOL /0080023 6.992 3.444 AAA 102.438 1,005,608.28 .26 36225CAE9 VAR AT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 ERA 1,013,341.54 .25 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 3.084 5.091 AA3 99.656 7,000,000.00 1.81 67182 KAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A- 6,975,920.00 1.71 2,IOD,DDO.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DEBS 7.113 6.346 AAA 104.391 2,030,133.00 .53 31359NEY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,192,211.00 .54 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LIG CO DEB 7.512 8.334 BAA3 99.389 2,151,250.00 .51 5426)1CT) 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/29/53 A- 1,967,780.00 .49 1,294,729.49 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP PER 195-7 3.564 3.536 AAA 98.594 1,275,814.29 .33 398101AE4 3.430% D6/O1/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 1,276,522.36 .31 1.OU0,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NY 3.582 6.607 A2 102.166 965,170.00 .26 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 1,021,660.00 .25 968,D72.88 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE IDOO-11150 7.694 7.667 AAA 97.829 947,047.54 .24 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO ID/21/99 ARA 947,047.54 .23 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 12 OCSP07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD S-P PRICE RANKLY VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __________ 3,000,000.00 PAC IFICORP SECD MTN IM 00115 0.309 7.036 A2 103.751 2,950,530.00 .81 69512EEUS 0.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,112,530.00 :36 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 0.324 6.523 AAA 99.641 32,498,400.00 '9.14 31364GYJ2 6.500% 03/12/2009 DD 03/12/99 AAA 35,073,632.00 8.59 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR MT 7.967 7.348 Al 107.165 1,594,032.00 .44 020002AL5 7.075% 05/01/200S DD 05/01/00 Ai 1,714,640.00 .42 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.167 5.986 376,523,830.07 100.00 393,408,095.20 93.83 -------- ------- _________________ --------- TOTAL 3.146 5.938 401,609,667.60 100.00 408,574,732.73 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 32,467.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -32,467.53 996085247 02-Apr-2001 32,467.53 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 32,467.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -32,467.53 996095247 02-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 118,184.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -119,184.84 996085247 02-Apr-2001 118,184.94 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 118,184.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -119,184.84 996095247 02-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 812,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 09-Apr-2001 -805,639.33 26354AT87 06/08/2001 09-Apr-2001 805,639.33 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 812,000.00 DUPONT DENEMOUR DISC 09-Apr-2001 -805,639.33 26354AT87 06/08/2001 09-Apr-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 09-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Mnp200/ 10:22::00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G. 010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,960.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2001 -3,960.00 996085247 16-Apr-2001 3,960.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,960.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I6-Apr-2001 -3,960.00 996085247 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,564,481.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2001 -2,564,481.68 996095247 16-Apr-2001 2,564,491.68 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,364,481.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 16-Ap0001 -2,564,491.68 996095247 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Ap0001 -8%,040.00 02225AS12 05/10001 16-Apr-2001 896,040.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Apr-2001 -996,040.00 02225AS72 05/10001 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2"96.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 17-Apr-2001 -29,396.00 996085247 17-Apr-2001 28,39640 B 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Rbrkbewh,. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGMI0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 28,396.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 28,396.00 996085247 17-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22 63743CSR5 05/252001 17-Apr-2001 2,497,122.22 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22 63743CSR5 05252001 17-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Ap0001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG(RD)DIS 17-Apr-2001 -2,371,604.00 31339REN3 MAT 07/19/2001 17-Apr-2001 2,371,604.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG(RB)DIS 17-Apr-2001 -2,371,604.00 31339REN3 MAT 07/192001 17-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 17-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,973.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2001 -5,973.33 996085247 18-Apr-2001 5,973.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,973.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2001 -5,973.33 996085247 18-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 18-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-1001 10.22:00 Ezeculive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 747,710.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 -747,710.20 996085247 20-Apr-2001 747.710.20 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 747,710.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-AM2001 -747.710.20 996085247 206AM2001 0.00 FC 206AM2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 113,719.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-AM2001 -113.719.40 996085247 24-Apr-2001 113,719.40 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 113,719.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2001 -113,719.40 996085247 24-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,854.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 24-Apr-2001 -25,854.60 996085247 24-Apr-2001 25.854.60 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,854.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2001 -25,854.60 9%085247 24-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -12.28 996095247 25-Apr-2001 12.28 B 0.00 08-Muy-2001 10:22:00 &r v f v 0brkbe h ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0=00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -12.28 996085247 25-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 310,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -310,833,33 996085247 25-Apr-2001 310,833.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 310,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -310,933.33 996085247 25-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL 00 DISC 25-Apr-2001 .99,997.72 26055ARS7 04/262001 25-Apr-2001 99,987.72 B GOLDMAN SACHS 8:CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 25-Apr-2001 -99,987.72 26055ARS7 0426/2001 25-Apr-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS R CO,NY 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,121.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 -13,121.79 996095247 26-Apr-2001 13,121.79 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,121.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 -13,121.79 996085247 26-Apr.2001 0.00 PC 26-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Ma 2001 10:22:00 Execuffm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 27-Apr.2001 •1,184,581.33 38142TVH5 08/17/2001 27-Apr.2001 1,194,581.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 27-Apr-2001 -1,184,581.33 38142TV115 08/17/2001 27-Apr-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 26,461.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2001 .26,461.33 996085247 30-Apr-2001 26,461.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 26,461.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2001 -26,461.33 996085247 30-Apr.2001 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,266.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr.2001 41,266.80 9%085247 30-Apr-2001 41,266.80 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,266.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 30-Apr-2001 .41,266.90 996085247 30-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 30-Apr-2001 -1,088,305.78 2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 30-Apr-2001 1,088,305.78 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Mr0-200/ /0:22:00 Executive Wnrkbench. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY D3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 30-Apr-2001 1,088,305.78 2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 30-Apr-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 30-Apr-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTG 08-Mu-2001 11,003,437.50 OIN062649 6.%MO4/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -11,003,437.50 BC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 3,501,093.75 OIN062649 6.500%04/M031 23-Apr-2001 -3,501,093.75 BE MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -11,003,437.50 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 11,003,437.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -11,003,437.50 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -3,501,093.75 0IM62649 6.500%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 3,501,093.75 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 08-My-2001 -3,501,093.75 OIN062649 6.500%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10.22:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANI'CATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000,00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-My-2001 12,396,250.00 OIN080641 8.000%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER•PDACO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS I&Mu-2001 -1,227,750.00 21HO72643 7.500%04202031 23-Apo2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23•Apr•2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 20-Mer-2001 -2,064,296.88 OINOB0641 8.000%04/152031 23•Apr•2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&00 INC,NY 23•Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 •Z769,074.22 912810DX3 07.500%11/152016 DD 111151 04-Apr-2001 2,769,074.22 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr•2001 •K712.71 912810DX3 07.500%11/152016 DO 111151 04-Apr-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 •2,835,786.93 912810DX3 07.500%11/152016DD 11/15/ 04-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -127,208.75 31340ONVI 7.750%11/072001 DO 11/07/9 04-Apr-2001 127,208.75 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 O&May2001 10:22:00 aeculive Workbench,, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -3,955.73 31340ONVI 7.750%11/072001 DD 11/07/9 04-Apr-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -131,164.48 31340ONV I 7.750%11/072001 DD 11/0719 04-Apr-2001 0.00 PC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 OMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -501,560.00 37042WVF5 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apr-2001 501,560.00 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -594.44 37042WVF5 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apr-2001 0.00 IS, 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500.000.00 OMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -502.154.44 37042WVFS 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apo-2001 0.00 PC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 09-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 4,181,199.22 912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 11/15/ 06-Apr-2001 4,191,199.22 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 -120,621.55 912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DD 111151 06-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Ma3.1001 10:22:00 Execuum Warkbew ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOOOIOOoo 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCS11-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 .4,301,820.77 912827D25 07.500%11/15/2001 DD 111151 06-Apo-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.OD COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG II-Apr-2001 -10,934,697.50 OIND62656 6.500%05/15/2031 21-May-2001 10,934,687.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 -3,480,312.50 OIN062656 6.500%05/152031 21-May-2001 3,480,312.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO 17-Apr-2001 -1,221,375.00 21HO72650 7.5001A05202031 21-May-2001 1,221,375.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG IR-Apr-2001 -2,065,625.00 OINDS0658 8.000%051152031 21-May-2001 2,065,625.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.OD COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 -12,392,SI2.50 OIN080658 8.000%05/152031 21-May-2001 12,392,812.50 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK - 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 -101,525.00 3133MBJU2 7.125%1 IIMOOI DO 0511110 20-Apr-2001 101,525.00 B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 E mlim WwkbencA. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 3,067.71 3133MBIU2 7.125%11/15/2001 DD 05/1110 20-Apr-2001 0,00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 -104,592.71 3133MB1U2 7.125%11/152001 DD05/11/0 20-Apr-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000 00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -201,878.00 3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 201.978.00 B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -6,155.67 3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -208,033.67 3133MIS34 6.260%10/292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00 FC ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 26-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000,00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 4,278,414.00 3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DO 02101/0 24-Apr-2001 4,278,414.00 B ASH AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -65,362.50 3133MAQI I 6.750%02101/2002 DO 02/01/0 24-Apr-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 08-May4001 10.22:00 Execiaw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -4,343,776.50 3133MAQJI 6.750%021012002 DO 02/01/0 24-Apr-2001 0.00 FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING.CHICA 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 -255,762.45 3133M5BC3 5.500Yo08/132001 DDOS/13/9 26-Apr-2001 255,762.45 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 -2,843.96 3133M5BC3 5.500%08/13/2001 DD 08/13/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 ,258,606.41 3133M5BC3 5.500%08/132001 DO 0811IN 26-Apr-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 26-Apr-2001 0.00 PAY UPS FIRED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9.32 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jm-2001 -9.32 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Jm-2001 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mar-2001 41.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Mar-2001 41.50 PU 0.00 08-May-2001 10.22:00 Executive {farkbe h ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Met-2001 -41.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Mer-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2001 -12,795.75 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 11/0119 01-Apr-2001 12,795.75 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2001 -12,795.75 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15M023 DO I VOIN 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr2001 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -131,164.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr.2001 131,164.48 996095247 04-Apr.2001 -131,164.48 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -131,164.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2001 131,164.48 996085247 04-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -75,620.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2001 75,620.67 996085247 04-Apr.2001 .75,620.67 S 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 &x na v Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -75,620.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apn2001 75,620.67 9%D85247 04-Apr.2001 0.00 FC 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,600,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr.2001 593,163.00 07588RTL9 06/202001 04-Apr-2001 ,593,163.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY o 00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000AO BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr-200i 741.17 07588RTL9 06202001 04-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,600,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr-2001 593,904.17 07588RTL9 06/202001 04-Apr.2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .4,300,000.00 US TREASURY BILL 05-Apr-2001 4,175,831,53 9127950C9 04/192001 DD 10/19100 06-Apr-2001 .4,175,831.53 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,300,000.OD U S TREASURY BILL 03-Apr-2001 116,590.91 912795GC9 04/192001 DD 10/19/00 06-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 05-Apr-2001 4,292,422.44 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 06-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-1001 10.22.:00 ErewNr Warkbewh. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSDCONSOL/DAM SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMFLDATE GAEWLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO . -9,399.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Apr-2001 9,398.33 996085247 06-Apr-2001 -9,39833 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -9,398.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Apr-2001 9,398.33 996085247 06-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 06-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -7,149.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Apr-2001 7,149.33 996085247 09-Apr-2001 -7,149.33 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -7,149.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Apr-2001 7,149.33 996085247 09-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 09-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,487,122.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 2,487,122.22 996085247 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,497,12122 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 2,487,122.22 996085247 17-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 99,769.72 313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-Apr-2001 -98,769.72 S GOLDMAN SACHS&.CO,NY 0.00 08-May-1001 10:21:00 Executive Wmkbmck ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 - 30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 904.03 313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 99,673.75 313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-APr-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,918.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96 996085247 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,918.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96 996085247 20-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -69,503,91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2001 69,503.91 996085247 23-Apr-2001 -69,503.91 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,503 91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 23-Apr-2001 69,503.91 996085247 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 481,115.69 313589GW7 MAT06/14R001 24-Apr-2001 481,115.69 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 0&hfay-2001 10:22:00 Enculme Workbench ., ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, n PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 2,986.66 313589GW7 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 0.00 75 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 484,102.35 313589GW7 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr.2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 1,185,622.00 313397GW5 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 -1,195,622.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 7,239.00 313397GW5 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 1,192,960.00 313397GW5 MAT 06/142001 24-Apr-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 2,666,782.50 313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 -2,666,792.50 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 25,886.25 313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Uap2001 10.22:00 Exeeuttee Wmkbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000,00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apn2001 2,692,668.75 313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -50,875.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 50,875.71 996085247 26-Apr-2001 -50.875.71 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO .50,875.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr.2001 50,875.71 996085247 26-Apr.2001 0.00 PC 26-Apr.2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPF.R-PIMCO .1,184,581.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 27-Apr.2001 1,184,591.33 996085247 27-Apr-2001 4,184,581.33 S 0.00 LONO TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,184,581.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Apr-2001 1,184,581.33 996095247 27-Apr.2001 0.00 FC 27-Apr-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO .2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 2,149,697.50 912810EQ7 06.250%08/15/2023 DD 081151 04-Apo-2001 -2,179,375.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .29,697.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 16,574.59 912810EQ7 06.250%08/152023 DO 08/151 04-Apr-2001 0.00 Is 0.00 08-Aiay-2001 10:22:00 Exaafrve H wkbenoh: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 2,166,262.09 912810EQ7 06.250°A 08/15/2023 DO 081151 04-Apr.2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER a 10-Apr-2001 948,300.00 613041GH9 5.000%11/15/2029 DD 1201/9 16-Apr-2001 -961,640.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 96,660.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000,00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 20,972.22 613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr.2001 969,272.22 613041GH9 5.000%11/152029DD 12/00 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr.2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 948,300.00 613041GH9 5.000%1111512029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 -861,640.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 86,660.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 20,972.22 613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12101/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 969,272.22 613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Map1001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 - 30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 1 i-Apr-2001 10,951,015.63 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -11,003,437.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -52,421.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 10,951,015.63 OIN062649 6.500%04/IW031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I I-Apr-2001 3,485,371.09 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -3,501,093.75 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -15,722.66 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 3,485,371.09 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Apr-2001 1,221,937.50 21HO72643 7.500Yo04/20/2031 23-Apr-2001 -1,227,750.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK -5,812.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 11 JUMBOS 17-Apr-2001 1,221,937.50 21HO72643 7.500%04/20/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 18-Apr-2001 2,065,OW.00 OIN080641 8.000%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -2,064,363.84 S BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 636.16 08-May-2001 10:22:00 &x .INe Obrkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINfLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 2,065,000.00 OIN080641 8.000Ye04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 12,390,000.00 OINO80641 8.000%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 -12,386,183.04 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 3,916.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 12,390,000.00 OIN080641 8.000Yo04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 305,695.31 912827D25 07.500Y 11/15/2001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 -305,941.41 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C -246.10 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 10,069.06 912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 0.00 IS 0,00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 315,764.37 912827D25 07.500%11/15/2001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Apr-2001 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Erecuthe Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 38,745.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 -38,745.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Feb-2001 38,787.37 PDC 42.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,786.50 - FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 39,796.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Feb-2001 38,828.92 PD -42.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,796.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 38,786.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,209.95 FHLMC GROUP 878fi064 01-Mer-2001 2,209.95 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012029 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,769.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mar-2001 47,769.50 3133TCE95 VARRT09/152032 15-Mar-2001 47,921.74 PD -52.24 TANG TERM OPF.R-PIMCO -243,684.45 FHLMC GROUP 805-0476 01-Apr-2001 243,694.45 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -247,492.02 PD -3,907.57 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -243,684AS FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Apr-2001 243,694.45 3129DDQ53 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 021011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Ma),2001 10:22:00 Execul(ve Sbrkbeech ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP#G4.0353 01-Apr-2001 34,316.69 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/011 01-Apr-2001 35,185.32 PD -868.64 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2001 34,316.68 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -102.28 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2001 102.28 36210YY90 6.0000/.04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -97.09 PD 5.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102.29 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2001 10228 36210YY90 6.0001/6 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apt-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -748.92 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apr-2001 749.92 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -710.89 PD 38.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -748.92 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apo-2001 749.92 36210AVM6 6.0001A 12/15/2028 DD 121011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41.29 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Apr-2001 41.29 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Apr-2001 -39.19 PD 2.10 08-Map100i 10.22:00 E=utiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIOW SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41.29 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Apr-2001 41.29 36209NBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .31.43 GNMA POOL 80499153 01-Apr-2001 31.43 3621000E5 6.000%07AR2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -29.83 PD 1.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.43 GNMA POOL 00499153 01-Apr-2001 31.43 3621000E5 6.000%02/1 512 029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-APr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -716.23 GNMA POOLN0500917 01-Apr-2001 716.23 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -679.86 PD 36.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -716.23 GNMA POOL80500917 01-Apr-2001 716.23 36210SPA0 6.000"A04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .55.75 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Apr-2001 55.75 362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/011 01-Apr-2001 .52.92 PD 2.83 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.75 GNMA POOL80497343 01-Apr-2001 55.75 362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Execud"Wmkbeuh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSG"l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SDAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,090.42 GNMA POOL80496284 01-Apr-2001 3,090.42 36210MJSI 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr.2001 -2,933.49 PD 156.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,090.42 ONMA POOL80496284 01-Apr.2001 3,090.42 36210MJ51 6.000.01/15/2029 DO 02/011 01-Apr.2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -323.93 GNMA POOL80491103 01-Apr.2001 323.93 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/OI/ 01-Ap000I -307.48 PD 16.45 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .323.93 ONMA POOL 80491103 01-Apr.2001 323.93 36210PRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Ap0001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,191.61 GNMA II POOL W080088M 01-Ap0001 82,191.61 36225CC20 7,375%06/20/2027 DO 06101/ 01-Apr-2001 -83,989.55 PD -1,797.94 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,191.61 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2001 82,191.61 36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .68,804.00 GNMA 11 POOL#0090395 01-Apr-2001 68,804.00 36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 .69,190.46 PD 623.54 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive WorWmh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO - -69,804.00 GNMA II POOL 80080395 01-Apr-2001 68,804.00 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52.81 GNMA POOLB0438057 01-Apr2001 52.81 36207PT49 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -50.13 PD 2.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52.81 GNMA POOL 80438057 01-Apr-2001 52.81 36207PTN9 6.0009/.05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,261.42 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Apr-2001 1,261.42 36209AET3 6.000°h08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -1,197.36 PD 64.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,261.42 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Apr-2001 1,261.42 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Apr2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,093.64 GNMA POOL M0465555 01-Apr-2001 27,093.64 36209AE48 6.000'AQ9/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -25,717.79 PD L375.85 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .27,093.64 GNMA POOLA0465555 01-Apr-2001 27,093.64 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DO 091011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10.22:00 Emcntim Workbeircb.. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87.83 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Apr-2001 87.83 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -93.37 PD 4A6 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87.83 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Apr.2001 $7.83 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.205.79 GNMA FOOL90467286 01-Apr-2001 1,205.79 36209CCX2 6.000%IW5/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 -1,144.56 PD 61.23 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,205.79 ONMA POOL80467286 01-Apr2001 1,205.79 36209CCX2 6.000%1 011 520 2 8 DO 101011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59.69 GNMA POOL90468330 01-Apr-2001 59.69 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -56.66 PD 3.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59.69 GNMA POOLOD469330 01-Apr-2001 59.69 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,026.27 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Apr-2001 1,026.27 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -974.15 PD 52.12 08-May-200f 10.22:00 Fmullw Workbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1.026.27 GNMA POOL 90468339 01-Apr-2001 1,026.27 36209DHQO 6.000%0B/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr.2001 - 0.00 FC - 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 459,887.79 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Apr-2001 459,887.78 36225CN28 6.500%05/7A2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2001 -455,217.05 PD 4,670.73 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO ,459,987.78 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Apr-2001 459,887.78 36225CN28 6.500Ye 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 20-Apr.2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,826.53 ONMA PGOLp0496461 01-Apr-2001 6,926.53 36210MQN4 6.000"A01/152029DDOI/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -6,479.87 PD 346.66 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,826.53 GNMA POOL40496461 01-Apr-2001 6,926.53 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,122.35 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2001 1,122.35 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DD 03/011 01-Apr-2001 -1,065.36 PD 56.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,122.35 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2001 1,122.35 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Ma3-2001 10:22:00 Exec dw B'mkbewh., ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLM4TED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -694.38 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Apr-2001 694.39 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2001 659.12 PD 35.26 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .694.38 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Apr-2001 694.38 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -916.96 GNMA POOL 00469698 01-Apr2001 916.96 36209EXRO 6.000%11/152028 DO 111011 01-Apr-2001 -870.40 PD 46.56 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -916.% ONMA POOL80469688 01-Apr-2001 916.96 36209EXRB 6.000%1111312028 DO 11/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8.417.05 FHLMC GROUP 878fi064 01-Apr-2001 8,417.05 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -8,211.89 PD 205.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .65,529.45 ONMA 11 POOL N0090023 01-Apr-2001 65,529.45 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Apo-2001 46,614.78 PD -1,095.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .65,529.45 GNMA U POOL 00090023 01-Apr-2001 65,529.45 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 20-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Map100I I0:11:00 Ereculim Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocs000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDA7ED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,577.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA 895 01-Apr-2001 2,577.35 398108AE4 7.430Ye 06/01/2003 DD 02129/0 01-Apr-2001 2,539.70 PD 37.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,577.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Apr-2001 2,577.35 398108AE4 7.430%0"1/2003 DD 02129/0 01-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 26-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -615.95 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 9000-11150 01-Apr-2001 615.95 302998GE3 7.500%1 210 1/2 03 0 DO 1021/9 01-APr-2001 .602.57 PD 13.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 I S-Apo-2001 29,971.91 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Apr-2001 -29,971.91 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A4 15-Apr-2001 29,971.91 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826t9 15-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apo-200I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Apr 2001 58,254.53 3837H4NX9 VARRT02/162030 16-Apr-2001 -58,254.53 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16-Apr-2001 58,254.53 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/I62030 16-Apr-2001 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 MATURITIES 08-A4oy-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 09-Apr-2001 790,916.67 07588RR98 04109/2001 09-Apr-2001 -790,916.67 MT 09-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC I6-Apr-2001 888,576.00 13443ARG2 04/162001 16-Apr-2001 -899,576.00 MT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Apr-2001 2,381,450.00 313397ELI MAT 04/172001 17-Apr-2001 -2,381,450.00 MT 17-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 BECFON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2001 98,622.36 07588RRR8 04252001 25-Apr-2001 -98,622.36 MT 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 25-Apr-2001 297,14133 90328ARR6 04252001 25-Apr-2001 -297,141.33 MT 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000,00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 26-Apr-2001 99,987.72 26055ARS7 04I26/2001 26-Apr-2001 -99,987.72 MT 26-Apr-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-May-1001 10:22:00 Emuliw Wwkbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 09-Apr-2001 500,000.00 37042WRTO 5.800%04/09/2001 DD 04108/9 09-Apr-2001 498,260.00 MT 09-Apr-2001 1,740.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN STR 00004 30-Apr-2001 1,000,000.00 73317PADI 6.200%04130/2001 DD 04210 30-Apr-2001 -1,000,000.00 MT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,384.98 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 638C90 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/15/9 16-Apr-2001 -1,384.97 CAL -0.07 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,384.98 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 1,384.90 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DD03/15/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00 PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,738.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 36,408.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,767.70 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 30-Apr-2001 0.00 SO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 103,270.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 9128272143 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00 SO 0.00 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 15,346.19 3133TCE95 VARRTOB/15/2032 15-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 27-Feb-2001 -15,346.19 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-1m-2001 0.00 ITC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,386.96 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 26-Mm-2001 -5,525.47 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DID 0229/0 01-Mm-2001 0.00 ITC 26-Mar-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 26-Mm-2001 5,525.47 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 022910 01-Mm-2001 0.00 IT 26-Mm-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Execwive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/IASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Apr-2001 0.32 996087094 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 GMAC MTN 02-Apr-2001 9,965.00 37042WWN7 5.910%03/11/2002 DO 03/10N 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 02-Apr-2001 14,500.00 37042WRTO 5.800%04/09/2001 DO 04/0819 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 02-Apo-2001 79,687.50 59018SXP4 6.375%10Po1/2001 DO 10/03/9 01-Apr.2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr.2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 02-Apr-2001 8,500.00 122014AD5 9.500%10/01/2001 DO 10/17/9 01-Apr2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 602.53 996085247 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 39,497.02 996085247 01-Apo-2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-1001 10.22:00 Exenim Workbench,. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001-30-APR-2001 OCSO-CONSOMDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9.32 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 02-Apr-2001 9.32 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 1543 2001 0.00 IT 02-Apr.2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 09-Apr-2001 9,093.33 07588RR98 04/092001 09-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 09-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 09-Apr-2001 644.44 37042WRTO 5.800%04/092001 DO 04/0819 09-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 09.Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 16-Apr-2001 67,500.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 15-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 7.16 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/1SN 15-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 16-Apr-2001 11,424.00 13443ARG2 04/162001 16-Apr2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 323.93 GNMA POOL80491103 16-Apr-2001 1,225.75 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP AG4-0353 I6-Apr-2001 0009.21 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 243,684.45 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 16-Apr-2001 40,185.81 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,090.42 GNMA POOL#0496284 16-Apo-2001 102.72 36210M751 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,826.53 GNMA POOLW0496461 16-Apr-2001 4,494.41 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT I6-Apr-200I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55.75 GNMA POOL0497343 16-Apr-2001 221.82 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31.43 GNMA POOL 40499153 16-Apr-2001 131.68 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 716.23 GNMA POOLp0500917 16-Apr-2001 117.29 36210SPA0 6.000°A 04/152029 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10.22:00 &¢cube Ww116emb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG0001000D 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,122.35 ONMA POOL80503388 16-Apr-2001 4,604.39 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 102.29 GNMA POOL80506636 16-Apr-20D1 369.38 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,209.95 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 16-Apr-2D01 1,418.45 31348SW23 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-My-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52.81 GNMA POOL80438057 16-Apo-2001 233.22 36207FTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 694.38 GNMA POOLM0457814 16-Apr-2001 421.60 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,261.42 GNMA POOL 90465546 16-Apr-2001 4,457.23 36209AET3 6.00D%0 8/1 51202 8 DO 08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,093.64 GNMA POOL80465555 16-Apr-2001 4,633.23 36209AE49 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-Map2001 10:22:00 Fs mtiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATF/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 97.83 GNMA POOL 00467279 16-Apr-2001 269.98 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/0V 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,205.79 GNMA POOL 90467286 16-Apr-2001 4,307.56 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59.69 GNMA POOL80468330 16-Apr-2001 231.36 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152029 DO 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.026.27 GNMA POOL80468339 16-Apr-2001 4,322.67 36209DHQ0 6.000%09/152028 DD 08101/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 916.96 GNMA POOL80469688 16-Apo-2001 241 A6 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152029 DO 111011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41.29 GNMA POOLA0483452 16-Apr-2001 170.23 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD091OI/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 748.92 GNMA POOL M0486720 16-Apr-2001 128.62 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2029 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-1001 10:11:00 Eu m1w lFvkbowk, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOMDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL AJ 16-Apr-2001 290.01 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 08/26/9 15-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2001 10,603.66 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,786.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-Apr-2001 15,181.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Ma 2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr4001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-Apr-2001 41.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Ma 2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 16-Apr-2001 12,795.75 3133117A4 6.000%1 I/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Apr.2001 18,550.00 313397ELI MAT 04/172001 17-Ap-2001 0.00 IT 17-Apr-200I 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 92,191.61 GNMA U POOL A080088M 20-Apo-2001 9,046.23 36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,804.00 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-Apr-2001 6,022.82 36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-APr-2001 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,529.45 ONMA 11 POOL 00090023 20-Apr.2001 6,702.08 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 1210119 01-Apr.2001 0.00 IT 20-Apr.2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 459,887.78 ONMA II POOL 4080408X 20-Apr.2001 49,526.23 36225CN28 6,500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTR006 23-Apr-2001 5,973.33 17120QE80 FLTO RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 21-Apr.2001 0.00 IT 23-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24-Apr-2001 113,719.40 682680A32 FLTO RT 04242002 DD 0424/ 24-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 24-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Apr-2001 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 25-Apo-2001 2,858.67 90328ARR6 04/252001 25-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-1001 10.22:00 Faecud"WPrkbaak, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000lo000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2001 1,377.64 07588RRR8 04/25/2001 25-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,297,306.94 GREYSTONE SVCNO CORP FRA M95 26-Apr-2001 2,511.94 39810MAE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 02/2910 01-Mer-2001 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 26-Apr-2001 12.29 26055ARS7 04/26/2001 26-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA M95 26-Apr-2001 8,032.50 39810MAE4 7.4301Y.0&01/2003 DD 02/29/0 01-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN MTR 00246 30-Apr-2001 44,419.37 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DD 04/27/ 28-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 30-Apr-2001 6,260.00 3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 29-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apo-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN MTR 00016 30-Apr-2001 16,600.00 44922YAR9 6.640%10292001 DO 10/29/9 29-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10.22:00 Erecudw War6bewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS MTN NTR 00555 30-Apr-2001 3,601.33 37042WZCS FLTG RT 0129/2002 DO 01261 28-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN ATR 00311 30-Apr-2001 24,590.85 61745ENY3 FLTO FIT 01/282D02 DO 01271 28-Apr-2001 oto IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 30-Apr-2001 29,562.36 79548EEE8 FLTG FIT 0428/2003 DO 04291 28-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN BTR 00004 30-Apr-2001 31,000.00 73317PADI 6.200%0 413 02 0 01 DO 0421/9 30-Apr-2001 0.00 IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00 08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive ft kbeadu FAHR COMMITTEE MeebngDate roaa.orar. 51ovrot 513ro1 AGENDA REPORT FA Numbe Item Number FAN um 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT PREPARED BY STAFF FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2001. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and approve the Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2001. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2001. This report is a consolidation of the financial accomplishments of the District through the third quarter of the 2000-01 fiscal year. Contained within the Third Quarter Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, the Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 76.11 percent, or $35 million of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of$46.0 million has been expended. Net costs have increased 6.71 percent in comparison with the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2001 is $518.25 based on flows of 67.56 billion gallons, or 246.55 million gallons per day. This is $3.85, or 0.75 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. This overage is primarily due to net expenses being 1.48 percent, or$511,200 higher than budget through March 31, offset slightly by flows being 0.63 percent higher than the budgeted amount of 245 million gallons per day. Capital improvement outlays through March 31 were 50.71 percent of budget, or $42,360,300. Outlays during the fourth quarter are expected to bring the total to $57,706,970. Collection system operations and maintenance expenses of all Revenue Areas totaled $7.6 million, or 79.31 percent of the annual budget through March 31. c:wy Uu�penN dA 0e �001 awm AWM fl,[Me W%Mlem,5(E).M0tWRdc Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable(information item) ATTACHMENTS 1. Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2001. G A,1.RepmsrlWI Bpard R9..ReputsIDWII1bm ISIdI 3ffi kd- Rensed 11510 Page 2 FAHIRCOMMITTEE MeetlngDate roeo.oroo-. OS/g/01 5/23/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Numtxr Item Number FAHR01-2e ISM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2001 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2001. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies;' and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,' are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) cw .duugewa rdaeenm FeP"WOl ewrdneeode Repo $WWI%ftm 15(040e Rewsae mane Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION �• 1 Performance Reports The Quartedy Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of December 31, 2000 and March 31, 2001. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through March 31, 2001. Portfolio Performance Summary Quarter Ended March 31,2001 Liquid Operating Doles Lang-Tenn Opera Monies(%) Total le Total Rate of of Return Benchmar0 Rehm Benchmark•.. Months 1.6 1.4 .7 3.2 6 Months 3.5 6. 6.4 9 Months 5.2 4.5 8.5 9.1 12 Mori 6.9 6.0 10.5 10.9 incelncep0on 30 Sept.95 5.8 5.J 6.9 6.7 Markel Value per PIMCO 31 Dec 00 35.010 382.7 Average Quality "AA+" 'M.- Current Yield(%) 5.8 .1 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 4.6 5.1 Quarterly Deposits(Wiftrawals) $9.4M Estimated Annual Income 1.9M $22.6M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Tenn Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt.1.5 Year Bond Index Market Recap Positive returns from fixed income securities helped anchor diversified portfolios during a quarter in which every major global stock market finished in negative territory. All bond market sectors gained as investors anticipated more easing by the Federal Reserve to stimulate a weakening economy. Stocks retreated as the correction in the technology sector that began last year spread to other industries. Investors looking for safety pushed Treasury yields lower during the quarter, with shorUintermediate maturities falling the most. The two to 30-year portion of the yield curve steeped sharply as the two-year yield fell 20 basis points to close at 4.92 percent. The backdrop for falling interest rates was the ailing U.S. economy. U.S. growth slowed to 1.0 percent in the final quarter of 2000,the weakest pace in 5 1/2 years. This sudden o:My.a,avgnftbaud ftaM fteM.T'dot BwN nand.nreaftKi llllam 15h1.4oc Rdh..d: 142016 Page 2 deceleration prompted two 50 basis point rate cuts by the Fed in January to prevent a slowdown from turning into a recession. Signs of economic weakness continued to mount, however, including a relentless procession of profit warnings from companies in a diverse range of industries. On March 20, the Fed cut another 50 basis points and suggested that more easing could soon be on the way. The central bank stated that it "will need to monitor events closely" as "the economic situation could be evolving rapidly." Consumer confidence revived late in the quarter as employment levels remained relatively high. Even so, pessimists who thought the Fed should have acted more aggressively at its March meeting could point to retrenchment in business investment as a sign that the economy would continue to weaken. The corporate sector staged a recovery in the first quarter, regaining some ground lost during a difficult period last year. The following is a comparison of fixed income sector returns: • Corporates outperformed Treasuries, helped by a strong January when Fed easing stimulated investors' risk appetites. Demand for corporates cooled later in the quarter, however, as investors refocused on deteriorating credit fundamentals in the slowing economy. A major source of weakness was the telecom sector, which suffered its biggest slump in five years in March. • Mortgages lagged Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. Rising prepayments after the recent fall in mortgage rates created price pressure that was not completely offset by mortgages' relatively high yields. Performance results of the Long-Term Portfolio The long-term portfolio managed by PIMCO turned in a 2.66 percent return over the quarter, underperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 51 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • near-benchmark duration was neutral for performance; • greater-than-index exposure to longer maturities was negative as short maturity rates fell most and the yield curve steepened; • corporate holdings added to returns as Fed easing sparked a recovery early in the quarter that allowed corporates to regain some ground lost last year; • mortgage exposure was slightly negative as price pressure due to repayments offset relatively high yields; and • Real return bonds added to relative returns, outperforming like-duration Treasuries as real yields fell. o vw.at.v'eeaa,mem ngems•eponnzas,ewrone.w wou�:wwnrem,s�el<x �,a:ermae Page 3 Performance results of the Liouid Operating Portfolio The liquid portfolio managed by PIMCO turned in a 1.63 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the three-month Treasury Bill Index by 23 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • a 1.79 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill Index by 22 basis points; • investment-grade corporate holdings detracted from performance as these issues were hurt by increased investor risk aversion; and - • use of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes enhanced returns for the quarter and the year. PIMCO's Market Outlook The U.S. will be mired in the first recession of the New Age Economy over the next three to four quarters as consumption and investment bubbles deflate. Global growth will weaken as demand in Europe, Japan and emerging markets will not compensate for the loss of the U.S. as consumer and borrower of last resort. Monetary and fiscal stimulus worldwide will mitigate, but not halt ongoing deceleration in global growth. • As PIMCO feared in its secular outlook last May, the U.S. economy will fall into a recession as growth slows well below recent trends. The recession in a New Age Economy will arise from correction of imbalanced consumption, investment and borrowing. Weakness in the near term will be exacerbated by inventory corrections in the manufacturing and technology sectors. • Greater savings by debt-laden and increasingly anxious consumers will shackle the economy. Weak equity markets will confront consumers with a negative wealth effect whereby they must save more of their disposable income to achieve their wealth objectives. Confidence will erode as layoffs mount, encouraging consumers to curtail spending. • U.S. capital spending will continue to decline. Weak demand will crimp companies' internally generated funds even as their leveraged balance sheets and heightened investor risk aversion restrict their access to capital. To protect cash flow and service debt, companies will curtail investment and cut expenses via more layoffs. • Monetary and fiscal policy in the U.S. will be stimulative, mitigating the severity of the recession. The Federal Reserve will move toward a zero real federal funds rate, which means cutting the nominal rate to four percent or lower over the coming months. • U.S. inflation will be subdued. Corporations do not have the pricing power to pass on rising costs stemming from tight labor markets and higher energy prices. A softer economy will reduce these price pressures going forward. a:W ...�nfta• fta Re IVWt5 Ap FepwbW Iftm 15(.)-0 R..I.W:erm•e Page 4 PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Tenn Portfolio includes: • Target duration above benchmark as a slumping economy puts a cap on interest rates and the longer duration will also offset refinancing risk from mortgage holdings; • Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure to take advantage of value across the yield curve, especially in mortgages and high quality corporates; • Continue to emphasize mortgages to take advantage of relatively high yields and strong credit quality; • Hold top quality, short-duration corporates with compelling valuations; and • Continue to focus on real return bonds as yields are expected to decline in the face of a slower global economy. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes: • Maintain extended duration as weaker growth puts a cap on interest rate risks and the longer duration will also offset refinancing risk arising from mortgage holdings; • Take advantage of relatively high yields on select short-maturity, high-quality corporate issues; • Continue to invest in high quality commercial paper as a means to add value and liquidity to the portfolio; and • Utilize agency discount notes, which offer a yield premium over Treasury bills. Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Tama Ouartar Opening 0pam0n9 Ending Monies($M) Monies(SM) 31 March 00 19.9 351.6 30 June 00 33.3 356.2 30 Set 00 33.9 352.0 31 Dec.00 34. 363.4 31 March 01 35.50 362.7 a:W.•.ftNWdal ,dl nw Fepa mot Burn AWW nep Imiem 15e). ne.;eed:arzoea Page 5 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2) 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph c Wq.�laNperbaWarC n6ena nepMarMot eoara names aeponsWsoluiem ISMAx aersea ersase Page 6 Prepared by Finance, 5/1/01, 2:58 PM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 - $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 31 Mar 00 30 Jun 00 30 Sep 00 31 Dec 00 30 Mar 01 10 Liquid Operating Monies 0 Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\8n\2220\geggi\Finance\investmgmtprogmm LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District Summary ln(ormatton II/J3y. 0 03/J1L2001 80 Quality ounlaznlro Total Markel Value(MM) $363.4 $382.7 70 rti 67 11031314am Quarterly Contrihutions(MM) $0.0 $9.4 as 60 Estimated Annual income(MM) $22.5 $22.6 50 Estimated Duration(yn)' 2.2 2.3 40 i 30 2122 Estimated Yield to Maturity 1%) 6.2 % 5.1 % 20 Average Maturity(yrs) 3.6 3.6 10 o s 0 0 7 6 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 Average QualltY_..._........_.................... . AA+__ __.. AA+_ 0 AVm oelnw AM M A oM HA n IMlawu AIM 60 Sector' nIQ0201 60Maturity �oLilaWl a° 50 44 SU 43 —p 40 4o t1 30 L" -E'I-- 11 R 20 30 2010 12 n n o 0 6 Law hag f." Non US$ ImetgWq (alter, Net not 0 H,,M, Markel, LXdv Ul yr. 1.1 yrs 1.5 yrs S.10y1 I0-20 rn 20syn Coupon 12/31L2000 ➢3L31/2001 Deriral'vn 12L31L2000 1137av20➢1 > 12% 0 0 Gross Futurese 0.0% 0.0% 8-12% 4 4 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 7-8% 19 17 Mortgage Backed 0.0 0.0 6-7% 59 43 Other' 0.0 0.0 5.6% 6 18 <5% 12 t0 Average Coupon... ..........:._._.. 6.4 h 6.1 % ........................ I ase ndalrmxl PoAnlinslmaln all lnke,eulllvity lady ge. I Intme,t ntc 111,a w I,Ihled nn rtltY allwtiv,he,of lelp,lanl ho rn,.y.—as. 2 trgales evalnymtln,WrW.o,dvdrma caning Werea4nward ronndooraaz 1 other Includes YaokeMmn taaxj,cono'HOlnandIrefsom sw1e;'Net Cast Iq jitalnx'etXtala cash o, ivalenls less ammminml et Lack rutje,%Imwad%and unswdea ludo. 4 Wrt, oleacked wonwes are ralq(owd It,weiglncl average llb. 5 lnrindesall Posen ere 6nnes and l uudellar hxurn contracts. Due to uw thrervntudh nsauldly of lla,U alollar futures contracts.lln nunawl vatosas Iteend10,10 Is,feast. 6 Serotines de,mdoed try inMCn to low Inlrnlially has daldc aurallm dnnrleridks,owh as In a M SWIn,Sgryaneuss CML,,and Irene I katm. 7 1 N,,,inrlmles—ailles waddt delve Ihelr value Imm nmlerlyo,Wvrrrl sales,strl,as rredll ytreada,swain alas nom U.S.&II allvea. LIQUID OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District Summary.Information 12/31/2000 E131L2001 $ Total Market Value(MR $34.5 $35.0 6o Quality �mcnnm Quarterly Contributions(MM) $0.0 $0.0 Zr s6 3049 Estimated Annual Income(MR $2.2 $7.9 40 Estimated Duration(yrs11 0.2 0.3 70 21 22 31�5 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%1 6.1 '% 4.6% 20 Average Maturity tiers) 0.2 0.3 108 Q � s Average Quality AA+ AA+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — _ -- -- -- nlml nM M n adaw nM BA n nr nlm It n 160 60 140 $CCIOrI 01 11 IIRWI 70 41 ■IU/11QWIalurilY M 01$n111 120 lomlw 60 2100 a° s0 e0 90 60 i 30 12 35 40 20 20 10 a S 0 0 0 0 u 0 n 0 0 0 a a 0 00 0 0 0 CoA W,, Can) Non US$ (111MI49 We, NrI CAlIV rile. 3 4 n. ban. 41$nm 1.f yn S r Ns ImvNMr Mrkels M.Mite, Coupon - 12/31/2000 O3/3.1/2001 Derivatives-- — -— 12131/2000 03=200.1 > 12% 0 0 Gross Futures 0.0 % 0.0% 8- 12% 6 5 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 7.8% 5 6 Mortgage Backed' 0.0 0.0 6-7% 56 16 Other" 0.0 0.0 5.6% 32 25 <5% 1 40 AverageCOu�on..�:_............._..........::: __6.4%......__......5.6 .:..,..................,.............................................. .. -_. _._.._.............._� I Mrasme M a l.nd.... lKn px a Imnl'n Prirr crnslllvllY to dunpes In hNrrnl rain. 11 Is a wdalnrA nralvrlly al Irmem wlue of all principal.xl nnereR payn.nl.a ! Lnluln quality rallnp Mrash npllvalrrxs l.dlnp lVlrnrMmvarAannrrlur.nb. .1 tahrr Indmks YankrMmu Ixxnis,mnvmddn n prdrrml NmhN Nn Caur y Mmiry Markr0lndudn Chills,SIIl,CP,nA.xl❑)r,Irss anumnl.barF Lr.A luwrq Iwwan6 slot nnrrnlnA tracks. 4 Moopp.ha[hal seonlllea are eVMMYINl Iry wvlRhiol avnaRe life. S A•anlllrx dorrmlowil by ISMCSI In love Llrvnlally lose'uhle toolloo'INar lrrlNX:r,v.h el, 11)a IV Stripe,Syrrxrrl d-e,CMIb,anal lumnx•I loalrn. I, Celle ,,Inriniki......Moe Mddr doll-IIM,value Imnre slolylo,inlrrnl rate;n.h as cloth 4lo,oh,swalx and rnxr11.5.dedvallwe, Prepared by Finance, 5H/01,2:53 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 7.00 6.75 6.60 6.25 6.00 5.75 W 6.50 i 6.25 5.00 4.76 4.50 4.25 4.00 E % 5 t2&Sep-00 29-1)eo-00 —a-30-Mar-01 G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Flnance\FilstodcalTREASURYyieldmrve � b, FAHR COMMITTEE MeeIn ,Dab± TOBd.or Dir. Ds/s/ol OS/23/DI AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iem Number FAHROI-33 is Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2001 to May 15, 2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $75,724. SUMMARY Staff recommends the annual renewal of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage for the District covering the period from May 15, 2001 through May 15, 2002. The Boiler& Machinery insurance program provides comprehensive coverage for loss caused by machinery breakdown and explosion of steam boilers or other covered process equipment, including damage to the equipment itself and damage to other property caused by covered accident. Sufficient funds have been budgeted within the 2000-01 budget to cover premium costs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's FY 2000-01 Boiler & Machinery insurance program provides coverage ($100 million per occurrence/$100,000 deductible)for losses caused by covered machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, co-gen engines). Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and improvements caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the boiler& machinery insurance. This program augments the District's all-risk property insurance which covers perils such as fire, flood, and earthquake. G I.dl.11rIc.ldAgene6 R.p IQXl B.Id Agenda k1WIW.9nem IS(B.BuleIns.eW Rensed W20M Page 1 May 15, 2001 — May 15, 2002 Renewal Cycle w Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, has compiled their survey of the current Boiler& Machinery insurance market and recommends that the District renew Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage with CNA Insurance Company, the District's current boiler& machinery insurance underwriter, for the period of May 15, 2001 through May 15, 2002. To analyze available coverage levels and premium costs, Driver marketed the District's Boiler and Machinery insurance requirements to three carriers. Kemper Insurance Company and Travelers Indemnity Company both gave preliminary indications of approximately $125,000 to $150,000 at the same basic coverage limits comparable to the District's existing program. However, CNA Insurance Company is proposing a modest seven-percent increase over the prior year from $70,792 to $75,724. Conclusion CNA Insurance Company, with more than $2 billion in reserves, is rated "A"/FSC XV (Excellent) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating agency)for its overall ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. CNA is a strong insurance company and can offer Boiler& Machinery insurance with high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the District. Additionally, they offer the most competitive pricing for the upcoming renewal period. Staff concurs with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient funds are contained in the current budget to cover premium costs ($75,724). ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Broker of Record Letter dated May 1, 2001. MDW G%w dNftegergaLLUard Agenda Redorr@MI Board Agenda Reel'islg5Al11ler 15111.Bpletlns.Enc Remed elxona page 2 ROBERT E. DRIVER ASSOCIATES a Dirision of Robert F.Driver Co.,Inc. Founded on knowledge, integrity and service. ASSOCIATES May 1,2001 Michael D. White, Controller Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Re: Public Entity Property Insurance Program(PEPIP) Boiler& Machinery Coverage May 15, 2001 to May 15, 2002 Dear Mike: We enclose our proposal for the May 15, 2001 renewal of the Boiler and Machinery insurance program affording a $100,000,000 coverage limit of liability on a comprehensive basis. The PEPIP Program underwritten by CNA Insurance Company (A.M. Best Company rating A (pooled), Excellent, Financial Size Category 15, Policyholder surplus greater than $2,000,000,000) continues to afford broad coverage at competitive cost. Although CNA's premium has been increased by a slight seven percent from $70,792 to $75,724 annually due to restricting marketplace conditions, their quotation is considerably less than informal "indications" of approximately $125,000 to $150,000 offered by Kemper and Travelers. Given that disparity, we did not pursue further negotiations with these alternative insurers. We accordingly recommend continued coverage through CNA and await your authorization to implement coverage. Sincerely, ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOCIATES i✓ Donald H. McLean Senior Vice President DHM:rp Newport Beach 4041 MacArtlnv Blvd-#300. P.O. Box 6450, Newport Beach, Cahfornia 92658-6450 • (949)756-0271 • Fax(949)756-2713 Lic#OC36861 • uww.tfdriver.com San Diego Escondido Sacramento Fresno San Francisco FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.of Dir. r' 05/09/01 05/23/01 T AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item NUMW FAHPOI-32 ON) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: INCLUDING ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 2001-02 PROPERTY TAX BILL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-10, directing the County Tax Collector-Treasurer to include sanitary sewer service charges on the 2001-02 property tax bill. SUMMARY Section 5473 of the California Health & Safety Code provides that sanitary sewer service charges may be collected as a separate line item on the annual property tax bill. The District has utilized this method of fee collection since the inception of these fees. The two principal benefits of this collection method are that the District does not need to develop or fund a utility billing division, and that failure to pay these fees results in a lien against the property, so all fees are ultimately received. The Code requires a new Resolution from the District directing the County Tax Collector to collect these fees every time the rates change. The rates for 2001-02 were adopted on June 28, 2000. Although these rates were lower than or equal to those adopted in 1997 as a part of a five-year rate schedule, they are a change from the prior year and this Resolution is required. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees collected, for the actual collection expenses. Annual collections costs are approximately $220,000 or .3% of the sewer service fees. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) G:VyANYgendaBayd A n.flepwLs .3 EoeM PpnEa flepa1sW501Vlem 15M P.PT.t "dx moms Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Collect these fees with OCSD staff and a direct billing program. This is a more costly alternative and one without a method to force payment. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD-01-10. c%w d 0W,enda%BWM Agenda Re,tt A2001 Board Nanda ReWS%050nuem I 9)RWTa,BYI dX handed: MMS Page 2 W RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-10 DIRECTING COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO COLLECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 2001-02 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTING THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 2001-02 PROPERTY TAX BILLS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 00-24 WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District elected to adopt, impose, and collect rates and charges for sanitary sewer services and facilities provided by said District, and established procedures related thereto. The sanitary sewer service charges were set by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and amended by Ordinance No. OCSDA 5, as set forth therein; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinance, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separate from, its general taxes; and WHEREAS, as part of the budget preparation process, the District's Management has prepared financial and engineering reports, setting forth financial projections for providing the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities to the District's service areas for Fiscal Year 2001-02. Said reports have been made available to the public for Fiscal Year 2001-02. The charges established by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, reflect an allocation of the costs of operation and maintenance, such that the charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to provide the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218), as of July 1, 1997, sanitary sewer service charges are deemed assessments. The sanitary sewer service charges set by Ordinance No. OCSD- 05, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, comply with the provisions of 1 t Article XIIID, in that they are existing charges first set by the Board of Directors of the District prior to November 6, 1996. The charges are not increased, and the methodology for the rate is the same as in previous years. The charges are imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs, maintenance, and operating expenses of the District's sewer facilities. Section 2: That the rates and charges set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-05, as amended in Ordinance No. OCSD-15, are affirmed or modified by the Board of Directors, as consistent with the findings hereinabove stated, for Fiscal Year 2001-02, in the following amounts: Single Family Residential Rates Revenue Area 2001-02 Rate 1 $80.00 2 $80.00 3 $80.00 5 $80.00 6 $80.00 7 $80.00 11 $80.00 13 $80.00 14 All Revenue Area 14 Costs Are Paid Directly By IRWD Section 3: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Tax Collector is hereby ordered and directed to include sanitary sewer service charges, as adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this Resolution remains in effect. Section 4: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed, or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, is changed. Section 5: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. Section 6: That Resolution No. OCSD 00-24 is hereby repealed. 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 23, 2001. CHAIR ATTEST: BOARD SECRETARY 3 t V MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT April 9, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on April 9, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickier, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Dick Corneille, Bruce Chalmers Wes Bannister - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Others: Denis Bilodeau Bob Finn —Brown and Caldwell Blake Anderson Jan Debay Michelle Tuchman — NCG Porter Novelli Lisa Lawson Jerry King Richard Bell - IRWD Bob Ooten Terry Lane—Garden Grove Wendy Sevenandt Others: George Martin -Anaheim William R. Mills Jr. Patrick Scanlon — Southern CA Water Co. District Counsel Doug Biglen Mo Hayes, Bill Tappan — Parsons Corporation Brad Hogin Steve Conklin John Carlson - Fullerton Tom Dawes Kelly Rowe - KERA Shivaji Deshmukh Eldon Davidson — Newport Beach Jill Everhart John Collins, Fountain Valley Cindy Gehman Fred Bockmiller— Mesa Consolidated Jenny Glasser Tricia Jaiwbiak— Salomon Smith Barney Clark Ide Ted Popowchak— CH2M HILL John Kennedy Bill Everest— Boyle Engineering Mehul Patel Debra Burris — DDB Engineering, Inc. Laura Thomas Mike Rudinica - RBF Ron Wildermuth 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held April 19, 2001 were approved as mailed. u Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes ; April 9, 2001 Page 2 of 6 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Value Engineering Study Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that value engineering studies must be performed in order for the Groundwater Replenishment System to comply for a state loan from the State Water Resources Control Board, a value engineering study had to be performed. Staff engineer Debra Burris reported that the firm selected for the value engineering study must be certified by the state. Two value engineering studies are required, one at the 30% design effort and the second at the 70% design effort. Requests for proposals were sent out to seven firms with two firms submitting proposals, Value Management Strategies, Inc. and Mr. George M. Wesner. She reported that a committee consisting of staff and groundwater producers met and concurred with staff that Mr. George M. Wesner be awarded the value engineering study. The groundwater producers also recommended that groundwater modeling and pipeline reviewers be added to the Wesner proposal. Ms. Burris reported that with the groundwater modeling and pipeline reviewers added, the proposed amount was $65,530. Committee members discussed insurance issues and decided that errors and omissions and workers compensation insurance should be provided. Upon motion duly made by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee authorized staff to award a task order to the George M. Wesner team, adding a groundwater hyrogeologist a pipeline expert; and adding a condition to furnish general liability, professional liability (errors and omissions) and workers' compensation insurance for the 30% Value Engineering Study, in an amount not to exceed $65,530 plus up to an additional amount of 2% of$65,530 for the added insurance requirements. 3. Authorize Additional Permit Fees to County of Orange Mr. Dawes reported that the County of Orange has requested an additional $25,000 be deposited to replenish the trust account for plan check fees and county inspection fees for the Groundwater Replenishment System —Theo Lacy Pipeline. He reported that the agreement with the County of Orange that will be brought to the Committee requires a deposit of up to $200,000 with any monies not used being returned. He recommended that the Committee authorize $25,000 increase for county staff plan checking and inspections. Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 9, 2001 Page 3 of 6 Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee approved Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 201897 issued to the County of Orange adding $25,000, increasing the authorization from $20,000 to an amount not to exceed $45,000 for plan check and county inspection fees and directed staff to issue a formal request to receive a periodic accounting of funds expended from said account. 4. Construction Management Plan Mr. Dawes reported that several months ago the Committee discussed and concurred that a third party construction management team should be retained the project. He recommended that a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Statement of Interest be sent to firms that have expressed an interest as well as other qualified Southern California firms. He stated that staff would begin writing the request for proposals and scope of work, while the RFQ process takes place. He noted that the selection on the construction manager could be completed by September. He also described some of the tasks that would be included in the construction manager's scope of work. Director Anthony requested that a schedule be prepared and to define what "checking plans and specifications" means to a construction manager. He also stated that staff shouldn't assume approval of items discussed with, but not approved by, the Committee. Director Anderson suggested that specialty services, including material testing, construction surveying, soils testing and electrical testing, be contracted by the project separately. Director Bilodeau discussed the staff proposed use of OCWD operations and maintenance employees as inspectors on the project under the direction of the construction manager and how the construction manager would feel about this. Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Anderson and carried, staff was directed to prepare Requests for Qualifications and Statement of Interest and return same to Committee for approval. 5. Subconsultant Selection for Soecific Elements with the CDM Team Mr. Dawes reported that a competitive proposal process for certain work within the Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM)Team design contract was previously requested by the Committee for electrical and structural design support, architectural services and computer systems integration. Mr. Dawes recommended the following: Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 9, 2001 Page 4 of 6 a. Electrical and Structural Design Services. With regard to electrical and structural design, he explained that while proposals could be requested, the consultant and staff recommend that the work be performed by either RBF or other members of the CDM Team. After considerable discussion, the Committee directed Mr. Dawes to follow the earlier direction given, i.e., to secure proposals for these services through a competitive proposal process. CDM will approve the list of firms scheduled to receive the proposals. Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, staff was requested to prepare a Request for Proposals for structural and electrical services and list of architects for review by the Committee, with the proposals to be received by the Consultant Selection Subcommittee for final recommendation to the Joint Cooperative Committee. b. Architectural design. Mr. Dawes reported that an RFP was sent out to eleven Orange County based architects resulting in the receipt of three submittals in January 2001. He requested direction as to where the Committee would like to begin the proposal process, and recommended that the Consultant review proposals for architectural design. Upon motion by Director Anderson, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, staff was directed to prepare a Request for Proposals for architectural services and to include firms drawn from a wider area than the Orange County area. The Consultant Selection Subcommittee will make a final recommendation to the Joint Cooperative Committee. c. Computer System Integration. Mr. Dawes recommended authorizing staff to prepare a scope of work and solicit proposals. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Anderson and carried, staff was authorized to prepare a Request for Proposal for computer system Integration and bring it back to the Committee for approval prior to issuance. Director Pickler suggested that the Independent Review Committee of Directors Anthony, Anderson, Patterson, Donahue, Bilodeau and the groundwater producers selected serve as the Consultant Selection Subcommittee. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: • Introduced OCWD Senior Engineer Doug Biglen who will be working on barrier facilities and pipelines for the project. Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 9, 2001 Page 5 of 6 • Introduced Ms. Laura Thomas, an electrical and instrumentation engineer, who was approved as a limited term OCWD employee to work on the project. • Staff met with the Groundwater Producers Friday, April 6. • The Public Information Subcommittee will be held tomorrow, April 10 at 9:00 a.m. • Received $759,762.19 in grants for fiscal year 2000-2001 from the Bureau of Reclamation. Director Pickier stated that these persons would serve on the following committees: • Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee: JCC Chair Pickier, Vice Chair Eckenrode, plus one director each from OCWD and OCSD (appointed by Directors Pickier and Eckenrode), and General Managers Anderson and Mills. • Public Information Committee: Director Bilodeau would be added as a member. General Manager Mills reported that the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee selected the fourth Tuesday of each month at 1:00 p.m. at OCWD for meetings. Communications Manager Lisa Lawson gave an update on the public information program. She reported that about 200 people attended the March 28 Joint Board meeting with 17 giving comments and nine persons responding by letter, phone and e- mail. She reported that in order to reach more people, the public outreach program should be continued and enhanced. Mr. George Martin reminded the Committee that the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Board requests that future public outreach programs be held in the City of Anaheim. Mr. Patrick Scanlon stated that the Groundwater Producers offer their support and assistance towards the outreach program. Director Bannister requested that staff investigate an owner controlled insurance program for this project. Director Pickier requested that staff come back to the Committee with recommendations. Director King gave a report on the April 7 OCWD tour of rural northern counties and their water concerns. Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes j April 9, 2001 Page 6 of 6 ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 14 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeung Dare TGad.Gf Dir. os1zs/ot AGENDA REPORT Ctem Number Item Number _ v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: MarcoPolo Velasco, Project Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. C-150 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) Award a contract to Pioneer Americas, Inc. for the Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. C-150, for the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002, with four (4) one-year renewal options, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $969,117.00. SUMMARY At the March 7, 2001 OMTS meeting, staff requested Board approval for price increases from our current provider of caustic soda, Great Western. The OMTS Committee directed staff to solicit bids through a competitive bid process for a new contract for caustic soda to ensure the District was paying the lowest competitive price for the chemical. The Committee's direction was in response to the requested unit price increases from Great Western. Caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) is used for odor and sulfide control in the foul air scrubbers at both treatment plants and in the District's main trunk sewer lines. It is estimated that the District will use a cumulative total of 2,162 dry tons of caustic soda during fiscal year 2001102. It is projected that approximately 1,300 dry tons of caustic soda will be consumed in the trunk lines and 862 dry tons for both treatment plants. Under the existing contract with Great Western, the unit price for caustic soda is $515 per dry ton. Under the recommended new contract with Pioneer Americas, Inc., our unit price is $448.25 including sales tax. This represents an estimated decrease of$66.75 per dry ton or about 13 percent. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The General Manager is seeking Board approval to award the Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. C-150, contract to Pioneer Americas, Inc. for an estimated amount not to exceed $969,117.00. G 1..d,.W,.nd.1e .�R...n.¢oas a..m ny..a.R... Z. 1111mn.osm. .. Rewsed: en.ree Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES There are no other feasible alternatives at this time. Caustic soda is necessary to control odors and sulfides in the collection system and treatment plants and is the only liquid chemical treatment method that can be applied to the trunklines directly from a mobile tractor. All other treatment strategies require dosing stations to be sited in the collection system. Staff is currently investigating other alternatives that, if successful, may be available next fiscal year. CECA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS OMTS Committee Agenda Report (03-28-01) GI dl.N...d.18.,d ft-da Re1.Q001 Surd Apmda RoWOW1111.m RG I W d. Re .d: &IG98 Page 2 9 OMTSCOMMITTEE MeedngDate ToX.Brd. 7/7101 3/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Numaer HOn NUMW OMT501-11 I 12(n Orange county Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager of Air Quality and Special Projects SUBJECT: INCREASE IN UNIT COST FOR CAUSTIC SODA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01- 01)for an increase in unit cost from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton effective February 15, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $756,300. (2)Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100764 Issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-01), for an increase in unit cost from $462.00 per ton to $515 per ton effective on April 1, 2001, Increasing the total amount not to exceed $850,000, if needed. SUMMARY The District competitively bid the Caustic Soda contract under Specification No. 2000/01-01. Caustic Soda is used to control hydrogen sulfides in the District's foul air scrubbers at both treatment facilities and to control odors in trunk lines. The contract was awarded to Great Western International for a one-year contract from September 1, 2000 through August 30, 2001 for a unit cost of $265.00 per dry ton delivered for an amount not to exceed $470,300. In a letter dated February 5, 2001, GW International requested a price increase for caustic soda due to the energy crisis and the resulting increase in the cost of energy, which has increased the cost of the chemical. In addition caustic is temporarily in short supply. Per the letter from GW International, the unit cost of caustic soda will be increased to $462.00 per ton. Subsequently, a second letter dated February 19, 2001, forecasted another increase to $515 per ton effective April 1, 2001. Like the first increase, the cost of energy and supply/demand of the market is the cause for the requested price increases. The District budgeted to consume approximately 1,775 tons of caustic this year. Due to the increase in odor complaints, staff increased the use of caustic in order to control odors from the treatment plants. This increase in caustic use resulted in the projection of an additional 200 tons of chemicals to be consumed over the contract period for a 10 percent increase in use. The total updated caustic consumption is estimated at 1,975 dry tons. r To evaluate the requested unit price increases, staff reviewed the contract with the present chemical supplier, surveyed other large agencies also bidding on the chemical at this time, contacted the other major suppliers of the chemical, reviewed industry chemical cost forecasts, and interviewed the District supplier to understand the reason for the requested unit price increases. The chemical supplier's contract allows pass through of abnormal costs. The data received indicates that the chemical bids are rising sharply and are over $400/ton; another chemical supplier told staff they could not match the proposed unit price increases and that electricity costs have risen substantially; driving up the cost of product; the industry forecasts reviewed by staff note price Increases will occur and will be substantially increased depending on the cost of electricity; and staff met with our caustic chemical supplier to verify that electricity supply and demand issues merit the requested increases. District staff and the purchasing manager recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 for an increase in the unit cost of caustic soda from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton that will increase the cost from $470,300 to $756,300. Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to increase the unit price of caustic soda from $462.00 per ton delivered to a not to exceed $515.00 per ton delivered increasing the contract cost to $850,000 subject to staff review of and acceptance the forecasted price increases. Staff has included a 5% contingency into the $850,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The existing contract amount for caustic soda is $470,300. Based on the revised chemical consumption and Change Order Nos. 1 and 2, the contract amount could increase by $379,700 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 5, Page 12) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Approve General Manager's recommendation for Change Order No. 1 and proceed with competitive bidding process to secure a new contract. Initial contacts with other major suppliers have resulted in similar pricing requested by GW International with minimal assurance of 100 percent allocation. t CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS 1. February 5, 2001 Letter from GW International 2. February 19, 2001 Letter from GW Intemational MAE/EMT:bac/pjm WB .dWagenoa'Board Agenda RepaM1 0001 Board Agenda Reports\0301\Item 121Q.00c FAHR COMMITTEE MeeOngDate roeo.oroir. y 5/09/01 5123/Ol AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number FAHROI-31 is Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGER PERMITTEE CHARGES, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON- COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEE CHARGES AND WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR 2001-02 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-15, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, and OCSD-13: a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 11, 2001. b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-15 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and pass to second reading and public hearing on June 27, 2001. SUMMARY In 1997, the Directors of the eight separate Districts each adopted a 5-year schedule of annual sanitary sewer service charges through the 2001-02 fiscal year. In fiscal year 2000-01, these previously adopted rates were set aside, but not rescinded, in some of the service areas and a uniform rate was implemented. That basic rate for 2000-01 was $78 per year for a single-family residence, and other users are charged a percentage of that rate based upon quantity and strength of the average wastewater discharge. The previously adopted basic rate for 2001-02, which is proposed for implementation, is $80 per year for a single-family residence. Preliminary budget analysis for 2001-02 indicates this fee will be sufficient to meet our cash flow needs. No Committee or Board actions are required to implement this adopted rate. The Source Control program also contains fees for various services. Last year the Board adopted a policy to base the Class I and II Permit User rates for flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS) on the sanitary sewer service charge rates. Tonight's action would implement that policy for 2001-02. Last month the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services (OMITS) Committee considered a charge for Special Purpose Discharge Permits that had inadvertently been omitted during prior Ordinance revisions and recommended that the FAHR Committee reinstitute the charge. The OMITS agenda report is attached and tonight's action will implement their request. W1 Afta%gwda`E WAgeda Red SOOO1 ewN Agma ROWSW501111em 100M 15 do R".: MOM Page 1 Finally, this action will combine various fees and charges that are currently distributed amongst r three separate Ordinances into one. While the rules for the various fees will remain intact, the ,. annual fee revisions will all be found in one document. A proposed Ordinance will be distributed at the meeting. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY General User Fee revenue for 2001-02 is expected to be approximately$70 million, a 3.7% increase from the current year as a result of these rates combined with service area growth. The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees collected,for the actual collection expenses. Annual collection costs are approximately$210,000 or.3% of the sewer service fees. Industrial Waste Permit User Fee revenue for 2001-02 is budgeted to be $6.6 million. Revenues from the Special Purpose Discharge Permit program are projected to be $410,000 in the first year. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION General Users and Background In 1997, the individual District Boards of Directors adopted multi-year Sewer Service User Fee Rates. These rate schedules were confirmed during the consolidation process through 2001-02. In 2000, the Directors voted to complete the consolidation by combining the books of account for the various Revenue Areas, except RA7 and RA14, and implementing a single sewer service charge. In order not to raise annual fees for any user above those previously adopted, the appropriate rates for 2000-01 became those previously adopted by RA3. These rates are based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year. (Rates for other types of users are based upon flow and strength average assumptions are set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-05 and OCSD-06, and are discussed below.) It is important to note that this action did not replace those higher rates that were adopted in some areas in 1997. They were only set aside until such time as they may again become the appropriate rates for that area. Setting aside, rather than rescinding these higher rates, will allow the District to reimplemenl them at a later date, if appropriate,without repeating the Proposition 218 notification and hearing process that was conducted when the rate structure was revised subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee public participation process. Because of other governance and service issues that remain unresolved, the Board decided not to include Revenue Area 7 in this rate consolidation. Therefore, the 2000-01 rates for RA7 were G:"AWa oendal dAoenN Repvs�lBMM Ags aRO� WldRm WON u.a% R.O.: WOMB Page 2 ' those that were previously adopted by District 7 and confirmed by the 1998 consolidation. s However, for 2001-02 the base rate, the single family-residential rate previously adopted for RA7, is the same as the rate adopted for the rest of the service area; $80 per year. Non-Residential and Permit Users In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates became based upon wastewater flow and strength (BOD and SS) per 1,000 square feet of development, rather than being the same flat rate per 1,000 square feet for all types of non-residential users. During the past two years, staff has been monitoring the claims for fee reductions and has been working with a consultant to evaluate the ratios for various categories of users. This year, staff is recommending that the ratios be reduced from 41%to 30%for the"High Rise Office"category, from 97% to 70%for both "Low and High Rise Retirement Buildings" Ratios for"Light Industrial-Single and Multiple Tenant,""Research and Development"and "Industrial Park" are all proposed to be increased from 30%to 50% as flows for these categories have exceeded the estimates. A new category"Septic Tank Property"will be established at 0% in order to facilitate the monitoring of these properties. These proposed changes will result in increased costs for 3,368 parcels and decreases for 220. The net impact of these adjustments is projected to be a net fee increase of$1.1 million. Rates for General User Fees, those collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill, have been adopted through 2001-02. The rates for fees collected from Class I and Class II Permit users were not included in that action and must be considered annually. In 2000, the Directors adopted a rate calculation methodology that standardized the constituent rates (Flow, BOD, and SS)for these permit users so that they are consistent with the rates used for the general user. The proposed 2001-02 rates based upon the single-family residential sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat Flow, BOD and SS follow. Dourest c Permit User I Flow Per MG eOD Per 1,0009 Se per 101100 E uivalent Class I and II SPDP 4.94 $185.07 $177.07 S80.W The General Counsel has ruled that these charges for service are not subject to the Proposition 218 notification process. ALTERNATIVES Maintain the current rates for Class I and Class II Permit Users and the current ratios for non- residential General Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee calculation. This would result in Permit users paying different rates per sewage constituent than residential users, in additional user fee refund adjustments and in lower than appropriate fees for some users. CEQA FINDINGS NIA GMy.EleNpm0elaeaE PpenN Fepm1512N1 emM/,psde eepwlsWAtYdm 18.OM ISAW ae.,>ee: ermGe. Page 3 ATTACHMENTS r 1. Ordinance No. OCSD-15 GGS:Ic G. m.ftmamOm WAg""RGPN 051 O-N AW'new M'Y' mteas 15. Page R .W:fl2m LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: May 11, 2001 RE: Consolidated Fees Ordinance This Ordinance, is a comprehensive consolidation of all of our fees ordinances into a single document. Except for the few minor adjustments, as reported in the staff report, this is largely a housekeeping measure, in that it re-enacts existing ordinances and repeals them into this single one. The major objective of this is to provide both the public and the working staff with the ability to rely upon a single reference source for all of the fee and charge provisions in effect for the District. Any of the fees which have been adjusted are within the limits previously approved by the Board, and are exempt from the provisions of Proposition 21 S. The Ordinance is 28 pages long, but again I emphasize that that it is because we have chosen to restate all of the Findings of Fact (5 pages), together with all of the related sections on each of the four major categories of fees and charges. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERALCOUNSEL TLW:Iam cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed RECEIVFD OCsO 136033\1 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD —15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES;ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES; ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS; AND REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, AND OCSD-13 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District') has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-05, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-13, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for all uses, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-11, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-06, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-13, establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinances that establish fees and charges, into one comprehensive, master Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01. Findings— Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. 1 e A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 at seq.). By action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan — 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the Predecessor Districts, during the years 1997 and 1998, commenced comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies to develop an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which studies are referred to as the District's "Strategic Plan", which was approved and adopted by the Resolution No. 99-21 of Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. F. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan, are 2 ' based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. H. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. I. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. J. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs to provide a service to individual parcels of real property which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of the owner of a parcel, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the occupants of the property,to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XIIID. Said fees are not new and are not an increase over any fees presently in effect. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service 3 Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each new customer to the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. N. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD- 11, established Capital Facilities Connection Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges' or "fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. O. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Connection Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. P. That the Capital Facilities Connection Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District. Q. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. R. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.)to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. S. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. 4 T. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. U. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. V. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. W. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. X. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Y. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). Z. That each of the Findings set forth in Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSDA 1, and OCSD-13 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, 5 construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance,the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or Industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge for the commercial or industrial user. Table A establishes separate rates with respect to each of the nine Revenue Areas, with the exception of Revenue Area No. 14, as to which costs are paid by the Irvine Ranch Water District. Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.03E and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting In an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or 6 (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall Include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four(4)years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any 7 other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto,for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.05E below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four(4)years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B), and 303.6(B)of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. 8 TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS Single Family Residential Rates 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Revenue Area No. 1 $ 96.41 $110.04 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 2 $ 74.00 $ 77.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 3 $75.50 $ 77.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 5 $ 84.50 $ 96.75 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 6 $ 79.00 $ 82.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 7 $60.00 $ 66.00 $73.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 11 $ 80.00 $ 90.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 13 $100.00 $100.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District Multi-Family Residential Rates Per Unit 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Revenue Area No. 1 $67.49 $77.03 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 2 $51.80 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 3 $52.85 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 5 $59.15 $67.73 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 6 $55.30 $57.40 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 7 $42.00 $46.20 $51.10 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 11 $56.00 $63.00 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 13 $70.00 $70.00 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District 9 TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1.000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm.Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption Addl. 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse— Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse—Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% 10 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin:ServiceStation/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bidgs.to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Farms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use VacantlDevelop. 82% 19 SFR With for 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97% 11 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery&Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant-Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant-Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant-Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant-Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% NOTE: Multiply the applicable percentage figure by the Table A Single Family Residential Rate for the applicable Revenue Area, in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. 12 ARTICLE III CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly- connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Connection Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, and 3.09 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. 13 E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies,the Regents of the University of California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings, and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305—305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Reguired. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within 14 the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%)percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity newly-connecting any building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial— Industrial Users—Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial— Industrial User("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. An Existing SCIU is any SCIU discharger connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. C. A New SCIU is any discharger who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraph 3.07A above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU. D. The maximum discharge allowed to a user,for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, attached hereto, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subparagraph 3.07D shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. 15 E. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow—25,000 gallons per day; BOD— 150 pounds per day; and SS— 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08 and 3.0 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. G. Within two (2)years from the date of the District's written notice to the SCIU of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, attached hereto, for commercial— industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the following amounts: Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge., Existing Significant Commercial— Industrial Users. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either(i) 16 an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or(ii) an increase of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever Is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.09A above: Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 C. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.10. _Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use. Section 3.12. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off- Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due,whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital 17 Facilities Capacity Charge shall be In addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.09 herelnabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.13. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.14. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. TABLE C CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet' Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00' Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.00' High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.001.2 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00 Studio Per Unit $ 580.00 Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $1,820.00; and all calculations shall be on a per square foot basis. 18 2The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at $1,600.00 per 1,000 square feet, but shall be incrementally increased from the present amount at five (5) levels, and five (5)time periods as follows: Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective January 1, 2000 $ 900.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective July 1, 2000 $1,130.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective January 1, 2001 $1,360.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. Effective July 1, 2001 $1,600.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specked herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 'Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries; Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. "High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. "'All other connections are Averacte demand users. 19 ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS. SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Puroose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i)on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (it)when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii)when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i)on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.03. Industrial Discharger, Source Control. and Non- Compliance Sampling Fees. Industrial discharger, source control, and non- compliance sampling fees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees — Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II Permittees as set forth in Table F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 20 Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE D ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $70.00/year C. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/year D. Special Purpose Discharge Permit - One-Time Application $975.00/permit E. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 1. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge— Prearranged $85.00/event K. After Hours Discharge— Emergency $100.00/event 21 TABLE D (CONTINUED) ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Administrative/Processing Fees: Charges L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal 22 TABLE E INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00/event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals: $35.00/each -Aluminum -Antimony -Arsenic - Cadmium - Chromium - Copper - Gold - Lead - Molybdenum - Nickel - Palladrum - Platinum - Selenium - Silver -Thallium -Zinc Mercury $78.00 601/602 $152,00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $73.00 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ('BOD") $44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids ("SS")Analysis $67.00 Chemical Oxygen Demand $44.00 Conductivity $15.00 23 TABLE E (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cyanide (Amenable) $70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $50.00 Tritium Determination $50.00 Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) $74.00 Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) $74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $48.00 pH $8.00 Fluoride $51.00 Suspended Solids (Total) $23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $14.00 Total Sulfides $29.00 24 TABLE F CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Revenue Area Flow (') S.S.. (") B.O.D.('") Revenue Area No. 1 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 2 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 3 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 5 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 6 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 7 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 11 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 13 $224.94 185.07 177.07 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area 14 operations and maintenance costs are paid directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District ` Flow - Per million gallons of flow " S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids "'B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand 25 TABLE G WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charaes Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity 26 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD- 01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. Section 5.03. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court,the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 5.04. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption. Section 5.05. Repeal. Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, and OCSD-13 are hereby repealed. Section 5.06: Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. 27 PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held 2001. CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTEST: SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL 28 FINANCIAL REPORT 0 00) 14,1/8.89! 2,889.66 M44.94 31-067.49__ - (1 • 19h,921.79 21,287.24 56,713.47 59,037.15 ---10,653,-47- -11,4, 0 �.010,432.11 217,327.71 519,004,44 602,727-5' � 764.38 116,81 0 256,403.79 27,717.25 73,84417p 76,86`. .85 13 1.45 14,8' .00 (324,432.70) "=. ,34 .76 ,/64 94 . -2 -,i..41 - (8,61 •. .00 4,1 o.8 l2 M 66, (2,044.y9) (3,067,49) 1 •'. 59 2q,59= _ 1m3S wr rNa 1a9 89 1 652. 19 9,2' 142 --(21,440.31). 0,1 • 916.11) (316,7i MAL :82 19-- 481.7` GL T^TRL 25;' 6 „ �� 315,287.50 7,6 47 1.475.7`: • CURRENT ; 1., 1; / NEW 7. .' N 4 25.40 . ` 1,475.7`' LEI' 1 1 • 004;'14.84 89,72104 302.419.17 310,456.89 6 ',220.'4 a , _ - - - • D J A � N Orange County Sanitation District, California o?i EMNAP r Table of Contents ,y. Section 1 -Overview...................................................................................................................1 FinancialReport- Section 2 -Joint Operating Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2 y Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3 Summaryof Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................8 Summaryof Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9 r Section 3-Capital Improvement Program Review r Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life........................6 Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area w Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas....................................................................1 Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2 r Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3 RevenueArea No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4 Section 5- Self Insurance Budget Review General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2 n V 2000-01 Third Quarter Report W v Fb This Page Left Intentionally Blank y w iy u bl b W Overview Third Quarter Financial Report March 31, 2001 r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2000-01 third quarter r comprehensive financial report. This report provides the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District and reports on the status of all capital projects in progress. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating Budget Review: At March 31, 2001, 76.11 percent, or$35.0 million w of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of$46.0 million has been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 6.71 percent, or$2.2 million from the same period last year. There are two main reasons for this increase in net costs: 1) During the second .> quarter of fiscal year 2000-01, a large retroactive adjustment was made to the amount charged to SAW PA in the prior year which resulted in a $685,000 reduction of prior year revenue being recognized as a reduction to current year revenue. Additionally, the current year charges to SAW PA of$756,300 are significantly lower than anticipated at 40.60 percent of the $1,862,650 budget. The prior year's over-estimated accruals and the current year's shortage are due to the decrease in the strength (B.O.D. and T.S.S.) r of the discharge flow from SAWPA. 2) As further explained below, the costs of chemicals used for odor control and the cost of natural gas have risen significantly over the prior year. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2001 is $518.25 based on flows of 67.56 billion gallons, or 246.55 million gallons per day. This is$3.85, or 0.75 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. This overage is due to net expenses being 1.48 percent or$511,200 higher than the budget through March 31, 2001. This is offset slightly by flows being 0.63 percent higher than the budgeted amount of 245 million gallons per day. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 2001 include: Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 72.68 percent of budget through March 31 while staffing was 7 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 1.37 percent below the total 510 FTE's approved in the 2000-01 budget. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year- end. Membershios— Membership expense totaled $175,200, or 94.42 percent of budget, as of March 31 because a majority of the District's memberships are due in the first half of each year. • Notices & Ads— Expenses for notices and ads were at 151.49 percent, or$46,400, of the 2000-01 budget of$30,600 due to searches to fill several vacant positions. r Section 1 - Page 1 �1 2000-01 Third Quarter Report 6d • Chemicals—Costs for chemicals, including those used for sulfide and odor control, total $3,515,000 through March 31, and are at 91.83 percent of the composite $3,827,900 budget due to the cost for chemicals being much higher than was anticipated when the budget was prepared. • Gasoline. Diesel & Oil —At March 31, costs for these fuels are at 166.45 percent of the $187,300 budget. Neither the compressed natural gas (CNG) purchases, totaling$158,400 through March 31, 2001, nor the more than offsetting CNG sales of$239,150 were budgeted for 2000-01. u • Solids Removal —Through March 31, the cost for solids removal totaled $4,026,000, or 80.52 percent of the $5,000,000 budget, primarily due to higher costs than were v anticipated when the budget was prepared. • Professional Services—Audit & Accounting— Through the third quarter, audit and accounting expenses of $42,600 are at 93.63 percent of the $45,500 budget due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year. w • Professional Services— Other—Through March 31, the costs for other professional services are only at 38.36 percent of the$1,372,500 budget due to some of the budgeted projects occurring in the last part of the year. Consulting projects related to the compensation and classification study and the District's biosolids management program have not incurred significant costs as of March 31. • Research & Monitoring— Research and monitoring costs are at 80.47 percent of W the $2,135,500 budget due to the timing of when annual fees for participation in research organizations are paid. Staff expects to approximate budget at year-end. • Service Maintenance Agreements—As of March 31, costs related to service 4 maintenance agreements are only at 39.10 percent of the $1,383,450 budget due to the timing of when many of the agreements are renewed. L • Utilities—As of March 31, utility costs totaled $3,546,200, or 112.75 percent of the $3,145,250 budget primarily due to the large increase in cost for both natural gas and electricity since the budget was adopted. • Other Non-Oceratina Expense— Due to the timing of a variety of miscellaneous r expenses, other non-operating expenses are at 95.98 percent of the$84,250 budget. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end. L 64 L Section 1 - Page 2 u Overview Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years �,n 518,25 s4l0 686A1 SW.25 e16N Y1.90 666.1s 6W- 600- 9W3rd — 9&8) 8&8Y 93ia Ann Qr Yeeend on Year 3elQ, Year 3wdQ, Yeer 3,e Mnuet Qr end Otr end alr aM pr end Ou Budget As demonstrated in the graph above, the cost per million gallons at the end of the third quarter has been within 3.50 percent of year-end totals for three out of the last four years. The cost comparison for 2000-01 is consistent with this trend as staff projects the year-end cost per million gallons to approximate the budget of $514.40. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter, as budgeted for 2000-01, and as actually incurred through the third quarter of 1999-00. All three charts are quite similar showing little change among the current year third quarter actual, current year budget, and prior year third quarter actual. More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third quarter for the last three years; Section 2— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for March 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001; Section 2 — Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2 — pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Section 1 - Page 3 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Capital Outlay Review: $90,000,000 _ $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $e0,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20.000,000 $10,000.000 $0 03/31/01 Actual Projected 2000-01 Originally Estimated Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 2000-01 Capital r• $42,360,300 $57,706,970 Outlay. $83,529,000 4a As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $42,360,300 or 50.71 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 2000-01 as of March 31, 2001. Costs are proportionately low through the third quarter as many projects are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are expected to be $57.7 million, or 69.09 percent of budget at year-end. w Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay b requirements incurred through March 31. For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 6 through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At March 31, 2001, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $104.37 million, or 68.96 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at $34.50 million, are at 69.45 percent of budget, or $23.96 million, and Other (User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, budgeted at$74.26 million, is at 56.29 percent of budget, or$41.80 a. million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. No sale of capacity rights, budgeted at $6.34 million, have been received because these revenues are not due to the District until April of 2001. a+ r Section 1 - Page 4 a. Overview Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at $4.82 million, are at 95.25 percent, or$4.59 million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Interest revenue, budgeted at $31.41 million, is at $34.01 million, or 108.29 percent of budget. This is due to both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than were anticipated in the 2000-01 budget. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $111.10 million, or 61.79 percent of budget through March 31, 2001. The costs incurred related to capital improvement projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are proportionately low through mid-year at $42.36 million or 50.72 percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. Additionally, COP retirement and interest expense, budgeted at $40.74 million, are low at 64.22 percent of budget, or$26.16 million, essentially due to lower than anticipated interest rates. Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims ny administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $1,343,700 or 57.63 percent of budget at ,, March 31, while total expenses were $1,994,100 or 85.53 percent of budget. w ro N, u/ Section 1 - Page 5 V 2000-01 Third Quarter Report _ w This Page Left Intentionally Blank i� u, V V Section 1 - Page 6 V Joint Operating Budget Review Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Engineering O 6 M 9% 55% r Finance 5% Comm. 1% Into.Tech. 6% Exec.Mgm1. Tech.Svcs. H/R I]% 2% Departmental Gallonage Charges 2000-01 Budget r Engineering 10% OaM r 55% Finance 6% Comm. 1% r Into.Tech. ]% Exec.Mgm1 2% Tech.Svcs.% WA r 2% Departmental Gallonage Charges r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Engineering 9% 0&M Finance 57% 6% Gomm. 1% Info.Tech. 6% r Exec.Mgml. 2% Tech.Svcs. r 1]% WR 2% Section 2— Page 1 r L 2000-01 Third Quarter Report _ Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Nine Months Ended March 31, i ' W 2000-01 03731/99 03131110 Annual 03f31/01 Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow In Million Gallons 66,521.09 88=00 89,425.00 67,556.00 IJ Flow in Million Gallons per Day 242.78 240.83 245.00 246S6 General Manager's Department $ 13.56 $ 15.07 $ 17.52 $ 13.15 L Communications 9.13 8.54 10.09 9.41 _ Human Resources Department 13.39 16.66 18.18 13.74 Finance DapeMe:nt j„ Finance Administration 16.98 16.31 1&95 15.72 Accounting 16.02 1528 14.84 13.94 Purchasing&Warehousing 11.72 10.57 13.85 11.49 Total 46.72 42.16 47.84 41.16 Information Technology Depanmera I.T.Administration 3.64 8.25 11.43 8.88 Customer&Network Support 17.72 18.73 21.63 17.39 Programing&Database 6.01 6.16 12.67 12.44 Process CO Integration 10.72 8.03 11.44 10.38 Total 38.09 41.97 57.17 49.06.. Operations&Maintenance Department (J Dime&Maint. Administration 9.34 9.40 4.75 6.46 O&M Process Engineering 8.71 11,82 12.08 11.36 Plant No.1 Operations 74.11 74.57 77.45 78.17 L Plant No.2 Operations 100.43 105.85 100.52 114.88 Mechanical Maintenance 53.39 54.34 50.42 52.70 Electrical&Instumentation Maintenance 60.24 62.55 72.34 62.36 j Central Generation 27.63 30.16 28.26 43.42 yj Ai Quality&Special Projects 11.34 13.49 13.14 13.28 Collection Facilities Maintenance 22.92 25.16 16.45 16.09 Plant Facilities Maintenance 48.13 44.50 45.11 41.34 I Total 416.24 431.84 428.52 440.06 Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 8.92 7.86 7.89 6.74 Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring 31.86 42.94 40.34 41.63 V Environmental Sciences Laboratory 32.08 39.21 40.36 38.79 Source Control 27.25 29.77 31.88 31.29 Safety&Emergency Response 6.93 9.24 1121 10.11 Total 107.02 129.02 131.66 128.56 y Engineering Department Engineering Administration 3.29 1,18 5.18 4.77 - Planning&Design 26.56 30.04 3Z30 30.53 I Construction Management 34.96 35.16 3&97 34.79 L Total 64.80 68.68 76.45 70.09 Total Joint Operating Expenses 708.94 752.94 78723 76521 Less: Cost Allocation (189.63) (199.49) (222.61) (209.70) Net Joint Operating Requirements 519.31 553.45 564.62 555.51 Less:Revenues (42.75) (58.04) 150.22) (37.26) - Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 476.56 $ 495.41 $ 514.40 $ 518.25 V � I Section 2-Page 2 u Joint Operating Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Nine Months Ended March 31, r 2000-01 03/31199 03/31/00 year to Data Budget% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 03131/01 Realized General Managers Department $ 801,841 $ 998,083 $ 1,585,950 $ 888,103 56.71% Communications 607,505 565,300 902,700 635,368 70.399/6 Human Resources Department 890,861 1,037,424 11625,580 927,944 57.08% Finance Department Fnanca Administration 1,129,813 1,080.077 1,894,860 1,081,032 62.65% Accounting 1,198,725 11011,988 1,327,350 941,065 70.07% Purchasing&Warehousing T79,452 700,353 1,238,800 775,966 82.64% Total 3,107,990 2,792,418 4,261,OD0 2,779.763 65.24% Information Technology Department Intonation Technology Administration 242,452 50,154 1,022,3DD 698,427 58.64% r' Customer&Network Support 1,178,701 1,240,865 1,934,600 1,174,881 60.73% Programing&Daudmse 399,951 408,154 1,133,000 840.335 74.17% Process Cud Integration 713.265 585.058 1,023,070 700,050 68.43% t. Total 2.534.369 2.780,231 6,112,11M 3,313,693 64.81% Operations&Maintenance Department Opals&Meat. Administration 821,064 622,868 424,500 438,195 10276% s, O&M Process Engineering 579,207 782.914 11080,100 797.142 71.03% Plant No.1 Operations 4,929,884 4,938,483 6,926,000 6,281,797 76.26% Plant No.2 Operations 61600.239 7,010,668 8,988,400 7,761,444 86.35% Mechanical Maintenance 3,551,321 3,590,625 5,224,000 3.560,183 68.15% d' Electrical&Instrumentation Miles. 4,007,284 4.142,536 6,469,350 4,213,042 65.12% Central Generation 1,837,898 1,997,165 2,526,900 P,933,405 116.09% Air Quality&Special Projects 754.649 893,331 1,174,SW 897,227 76.39% �y Collection Facilities Maintenance 1,524,805 1,666,118 1,470,950 1,097.116 73.91% Plant Facilities Maintenance 3,201,655 2,947,361 4,034,000 2,792,486 69.22% Total 27,637,806 28.599.757 38,318,400 29,730,037 77.69% Technical Services Department 1° Technical SeMces Administration 593.224 620,348 705,800 455.253 64.52% Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 2,119,230 2,843,879 3,607,000 2,812,764 77.98% Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,132,645 2.596.915 3,609,150 2,62D,445 72.61% w Source Control 1,812,477 1,971,290 2,849,250 2,113,866 74.19% Safety&Emergency Response 400,034 612,003 1,002,850 683,190 68.14% Total 7,118,610 8,644.233 11.773,650 8,885,618 73.77% Engineering Department ,.. Engineering Administration 218.852 23D,573 463,60D =359 69.53% Planning&Design 1.708,178 1,989.411 2,888,300 2,062,154 71.40% Construction Management 2.3211 2,328,419 3,485,10D 2,350,223 67.44% .� Total 4,310,589 4,548,403 6.837,000 4,734.736 69.25% Total Joint Operating Expenses 47,159,271 49,865.049 70,397,250 51,895,202 73.43% Loss: Cost Allocation (12,614,168) (13211,857) (19,908,H00) (14,166,971) 71.17% .r Net Joint Operating Requirements 34,546,103 36,653,992 50,490,650 37,628,591 74.33% Less:Revenues (2.843,734) (3.843.725) (4,490,650) (2,517,433) 56.06% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 31,701,369 $ 32,810,267 $ 46.000.000 $ 35.011,158 76.11% .e Section 2-Page 3 W 2000-01 Third (quarter Report i , u Summary of Expenses by Major Category For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 W Expense EVerse Invease Increase Percent Budget Thm T1au (Decrease) (Deoreme) Budget Re ning .� Oeaoipson 200001 03131N7 0WIM $ % Redlsd Budget W Salary,Wages;8 Bene61s $41,297,700 $30,008.255 $29.117.697 $ Ball 3.06% 72.68% $ 11,279.445 AdrWrilerafiveEKparvars 763,OD0 534,256 467,627 66,729 1427% 70.02% 228,744 W Printing B Pmlieation 3WOM 275,190 246,960 29"0 11.43% 78.11% 7,,110 Training 8 Meetings 901,850 531,258 552471 (21,213) 3.84% 58.91% 370.592 � Operelg Erpereas 4,712,960 4,,M,811 3.847,241 526,570 13.69% 92.8D% 339,149 Contractual Services 7.239,200 5,398.308 5.241.375 156,933 299% 74.57% 1.840.892 Pra4essiarral Services 2,115,500 1.088.067 1,374,106 (288,829) -21.01% 51.34% 1,029,433 W Research$MorNaing 2,135.500 1,718,537 1,574,142 141,395 8.17% 80.47% 418,983 Repairs 8 Mairdemrxe 5291,50D 2815,930 3,383,651 (567,751) -16.70% 5322% 2,475.570 1 ' yr Utifdiev 3.145,250 3,546,189 2717,978 B28,211 3D.47% 112.75% (400.939) Odwr Maivials,Supplies, and Services 2452,490 1,407,461 1,341,881 65,580 4.89% 67.39% 1,045,029 W Cost Allacatien (19,905,600) (14,166.971) (13,211,857) (954,814) 7.23% 71.17% (5,739,929) -- i Total Joint Operating Expense 50,490,650 37,528,591 36,653,992 874,598 2.39% 74.33% 12,962,059 Revenms (4,490,650) (2517,433) (3.843725) 1,326.292 34.51% 66.06% (1,973217) , W.1.4,1 Opaeting ExWym $46.000.000 $35.011,158 $32.810267 $ 2200,891 6.71% 76.11% $ 10,988,842 Gallmaga Floe,WQ 89,425.00 67,555.00 66=00 1,328 2.01% r.l Gallonage Flow(MGD) 245.00 246.55 240.83 5.72 2.38% GellonwWFlow($'sAFQ $514.40 $518.25 $495AI =34 4.61% I '. 6w i V 6ri Section 2—Page 4 W Joint Operating Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 r % ilevenue 1levenw Revenue Incnaee Invease Budget Thm TMu Remeinug thru loeereeea) (neaeam) Deapdpfl. 200D.01 03r31M 031e10n Budget 0301100 $ % wl Inter District Sewer Use $1,862.650 $ 71,315 3.83% $1.791.335 $1,853,199 $(1,781,884) -96.15% Wastehauler 425,000 354,875 83.50% 70,125 302,646 52,329 17.30% ar Sludge Disposal soo,000 504,329 63.04% 295,671 613.450 (109,121) -17.79% CNG Sales - 239,150 WA (239,150) 2,522 236,628 9382.55% r Scrap Sales - 146aB WA (12,686) 3,239 9.449 291.73% Omer Sales - 12,069 WA (12,069) 9,274 2,795 30.14% Rents&Leases 128,000 12B,163 100.13% (163) 121,659 6.504 5.35% r General Non-Operatmg 75,000 189.288 252.38% (114,298) 63,237 126,051 199.33% Vehlde&Equipment 300,000 174,360 68.12% 125,640 226,860 (52,500) -23.14% Power Sales 550,000 427,636 77.75% 122,364 399,043 28,593 7.17% Sampling Charges 350,000 403.560 115.30% (53.560) 248,696 154,864 62.27% Total Joint Operating Revenues $4,490,650 S2,517.433 56.06% $1,973.217 $3,843.725 $ 1 326292 -34.51% s e! r r, r r ry Section 2—Page 5 r 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item L For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Eqxr,se %F Irvea,e Increase W ON Thm T7eu Ranellning 71Tu Pacne w) (Oecleae) Desorption 2000-M 03011111 03/41b1 Butlga 0301= S % . Selades waves 8llerhflb y' Salaries 8 Wages $34,69,70D $25,329.838 74.14% $ 9.009064 $24,658,248 $ 971,588 3.91% Fmp104ee Bereft 4 Retiremeri Z400,90D 1,251,679 50.98% 1,176,621 1,575022 051,743) -MM Crap hsw xs 3,614,50D Z595,859 71.82% 1,018641 Z337,878 257,963 11.03% Tultim Rehnburserent - 55,778 WA (55,778) M197 (419) -0.75% Union,Pental 69,20D 54,519 7978% 1401 50.301 4,218 8.39% L. Workers'Carpestaw 310200 232.498 74.95% 77.702 232.500 (2) 0.00% Urorpl%mert lmrance 53,B0D 16.086 29.90% 37,714 7,133 8,953 12552% Total Bereft 6,448,000 4.178,419 64.e0% 2,M15131 4,M.449 (81,030) -1.gD% y salaries.Wages,8 Baefits 41287,70D 30,DDSZ55 7268% 11ZMA45 29.117.697 898558 3.05% Mete.SupoN,B SWA l AAriiNsbaBse 6Re>ses _ Memberships 185,5W 175,151 94.42% 10,349 131.143 44,008 33.58% Office Fey-Suppliers 141,100 85,895 60.73% M405 90,093 (4,398) -4.80% 01Moa Expense-OOIe 89,30D 55,395 62.03% 33,905 57.412 ROM -am% ~ Small CarpiMr Items 250,000 168.090 6724% m810 1342D1 3),7B9 25.16% _ Mrrr Fwnihee.Fomrres,etc. 97,100 49.%5 51.42% 47.175 545M (4,653) 453% PrhdhV 6Pubfication hhu PepWrHWse 254,300 197,450 73.71% 66.850 181,325 8,124 390% _. plvvlimskla 59.450 36392 6121% 23,058 30.766 5,626 1828% Notate B Ads 30,600 46,357 151.49% (15.757) 3D,788 15,669 50.57% t.l Paolo Rpcesng 7.95D 4,991 6278% 2.959 4,080 M1 2Z33% Training B Meetirgs ) Meetings 223,850 143,907 64291/. 79,043 ism (91016) 3W% W Trainug 678.000 387,351 57.13% 290,649 399.648 OZIM J.05% Operating Fxp¢nsee Chemical CoagWan6 1261.100 1,10D,980 81D.09% 260,120 9MO2 128,948 1327% v Sulfide Cabd 1,435000 L316,795 91.76% 118214 1.041254 2MB22 26.46% Clor Carnal 997,WD 110811148 108.35% (83.348) 1,061,409 19,739 1.85% Chemicals-Colienwatco Open. 2D,00D 4882 24.41% 15,118 5.074 (192) W13% V Msce0areas Charente 14,000 112M 80.16% Z777 M404 (11,161) -49.91% Casafne,Cesel 30il 187MO 311,789 166.45% (124,469) 13Q556 17=3 128.31% Tads IM700 83.485 69.17% 37215 113,734 OMM 2&6D% Sdv,Paacte BJmi Suppries 43.950 3Z571 74.11% 11,379 31.478 1,093 3,47% r Lab Oemnnls B Supplies 396,400 319,728 82.76% 66,672 348,771 (29.043) 41.33% OBler Cperatigscloies 14Q710 Ili,= 7582% 35,471 114,519 (3M -288% -- (Cmtlrured) V Ls Section 2—Page 6 u Joint Operating Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Rem For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 r Expaee %Expavx EXWwe Ircleam Ins Brdod Thu T ru pmmbdng Thu (Oaeca9e) ( ) Oasaipeen 200001 03131M COMM Budge 0ROM $ % ~ Canreeeud Sedcss Sd'tt5 Renewal 6000,000 4,025,960 80WA 974.040 3,654,9W 351.057 925% Other Waste D-40621 467,100 2M280 5893% 191,820 318,284 (42.984) -135l% y l3aod.;lerying&Jariftft 410,000 309.704 7554% IOD296 210,857 3B,847 14.34% Ouhda lab Sersk= 265,70D 151,477 5701% 114223 140,902 10.5E 7.51% Oxygen Plard Ope 295,000 217,W 73.64% 77.773 210,116 7,111 3.38% Other 801,400 418,660 5224% 382.740 64&333 (217,6M -M21% ^� Pmfeealala serve= legal 42D,000 332,O7 79.05°/h 97M 3OZ,737 29.270 9.67% Ault&Accmtr,g 45,500 4ZODO 9363% 49M 45,10D (2,500) -654% Engneedng 277,500 185,014 6&67% SZ486 2SZ242 (770M -MAB% COW 1,372,5W 528.446 3&35% 846,054 764,817 (238.371) 31.17% fiesevdl&Mrs Ioing Endromranal Mxdtaing 1,510.000 1,389,870 9&72% UQ130 1,23 ,657 133213 10,77% er AhOua0yPwbff ring 75,ODD 74,9M 99M% 17 - 74,9M WA Research smsm 273,664 49.72% 276,816 337,485 (63.801) -1&90% Repairs It MmImmee Materials&Ses4us 3,908,050 2275,056 5&21% 1,632,994 2,a72,329 (597273) -M79% 9c MC Pgremma 1,383,450 54Q874 39.10% 842676 511,352 29,522 5.77% t15INes - Taephore 251,850 149.561 59.38% 1OZ309 15&890 (7,399) 4.68% ti Oiasel ForGwwatas 11.000 11,635 105.77% (635) 10,311 1,324 12,84% Nabaal Cvs 1,130,000 1.780220 15754% (650M 969,485 82Q735 85.54% Peeer 921,500 6M641 9394% 66,859 1,011,646 (145,90% -14.42% Water =900 739152 saw% 91,748 SM746 1SR405 Z7.50% M OKWCpea5ngsmplae O&Ide Egip Rwlud 14Q1SO 113,984 77.98% 32196 W490 14,404 1457% DWktE9up RMbd 32ZOOD 174,076 $4.08% 147,924 226,682 (5Z606) -2321% �, Insistence 10,Oo0 773,03B 64.42% 42UM 719.M S%7T2 7.48% Raw 5Z560 48267 91.81% 43Q4 41,708 6,549 15.70% Mac Open"Ehpense 169,ODD 114,997 6803% 54PK4 109.840 5,127 4.67% ACfvDOpea"Fees 12D,000 1OZ275 8523% 17,725 94,817 7,45E 7.W% d Oearal Meege C3dngecy 358.903 - 0.00% 358,500 - - WA Pea year raslxgxa0an - - µA - - - WA Otl1rcNmOpe 6werte 84,250 BQB64 M98% 3386 %(178 30.786 SLAB% Mara,Supp,&Baru. 29.109,550 21,687,007 7450% 7,422,543 2Q74&152 93883 453% Tarim A 0.Repelerads 70.397,250 51,695,252 7343% 18,701,998 49.8&9,849 1,829,413 &67% r Nal COW Alloa6un (19,90Q600) (14,16Q671) 71.17% (5,739,929r (13,211,W7) (954,814) -72M NeJ.0.Rdpmmieas SQ49Q660 37,52&591 74.33% 1ZWZ059 36,653.992 974,%9 239% Lose: Aesene (4,490.65g (2,617,433) 5&06% (1,973217) (%M725) 1,32&292 34.51% er NatJ.O.Ehpadisxes $46,000.000 $35,011,158 76.11% $ lQ968,842 $3Z810287 $ 2200,891 6.71% e4 Section 2—Page 7 r W 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Increase Increase w Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 03/31/01 03/31/00 $ % Treatment Process: y� Preliminary Treatment $ 4,379,128 $ 3,896,551 $ 482,577 12.38% Primary Treatment 3,628,879 3,342,701 286,178 8.56% Secondary Treatment 2.821,213 2.518.875 302,338 12.00% V Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 419,384 440.321 (20,937) -4.75% Effluent Disposal 398,533 476,894 (78,361) -16.43% Solids Handling 15.898,166 15,046,812 851.354 5.66% _ Cogeneration 3.307,128 3,136,689 170,439 5.43% � Utilities 749,780 802,003 (52,223) -6.51% w Electrical Distribution 390,674 461,323 (70,849) -15.31% Miscellaneous Buildings 3,145,362 3,386,452 (241,090) -7.12% it Air Ouality 701,256 758,612 (57,356) -7.56% Laboratory 1,689,088 2,388,759 (697,671) -2923% W Total Joint Operating Requirements 37,528,591 36,653,992 874,599 2.39% w Less: Revenues (2,517,433) (3,843,725) 1,328,292 34.51% Not Joint Operating Expenditures $ 35.011,158 $ 32,810,267 $ 2,200.891 6.71%. W V L G W 4 Section 2—Page 8 Joint Operating Budget Review Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents March 31,2001 575 560 560 549 519 510 450 OWN197 06130198 0W30199 OWW00 0313112001 ■Actual ■Vacant r r r At March 31, 2001, the total head count was 513 employees, or a full time equivalency of 502.50. r r r Section 2— Page 9 u 2000-01 Third Quarter Report I u it u L L L fi L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank u L L It L+ i IJ L I , V V li Section 2—Page 10 4 L CIP Review Capital Improvement Program-FY 2000-01 For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 St.r vievz Ig Svo],a9 4% q% PrlrmYlreSrteY S12.674273 J% R03 BJ] r Cdl®Imi Milt la SevYlaYlr®ryes 57.662,466 r 5ad,Ndoo, &Dl,illrl9n B% 5 W]0 av5 Pr,a YW P19M. 3o 2% IS I811 1tM.199 0,001 yp IS 2% r 559 5L92)652 unlnvSnrysloNeR W de Srg% % 9L, 1 SJ.BOB.505 6JR .S r M Iltrru& ya. 0.5g8 5&J�.2W R3% S,CW'9Prgefs Prcad3 Rod. Pldt h.,RrdS n& ]% v% Praeds cam39.alm _. Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$42,360,273 vLM3.m2 calaya,snren 90% r 5J.559.817 RA9sBbp7 No 8% $10,7,764 Rae M.No.. 2% Total Capital Improvement Funding -$42,360,273 Section 3- Page 1 2000-01 Third Quarter Report u Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 200001 200DO1 2000-01 200001 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected LJ Outlay 03131/01 Outlay Outlay Collection System Improvement Protects Collections Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 9 64,000 9 12.278 S 51,722 9 51,200 V Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 146,000 - 146,000 - CaMlnuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 119,000 - 119,OD0 - Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 68.000 - 68,000 j j Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 234,000 - 234,000 - LI Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer 210,000 86.230 123,T70 98,390 Carbon Cnyn Server and Pump SM.Abandonment 43,000 49.041 (6,041) 51.000 Santa Ana River Intercepter Relief Sewer 146,000 163.131 (17,131) 248.000 I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations 15,W L D 9,101 5,599 12,730 Santa Ana Rim Interceptor Realignment and Protec. 1,475,000 1,087,158 387,842 1.147,000 Taft Branch Improvements 7.000 7,000 7,000 Atwood Subtrunk Improvements 92.000 57,395 34.605 90,400 1I Replacement of Maer-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 49.000 882,674 (833,674) B9QOW L+ Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer 11186,000 81,494 1,124.606 64,760 Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Server 2,214,000 341.819 1,872,181 341.820 - Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1 3,052,000 2,464,939 1,197,061 2.691,80D Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station - 8,097 (8,087) 49,430 Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Westam Ave. 73,000 1.502 71,493 1,800 Big Canyon Oesita Sewer Rehabilitation 38,000 15,578 22,422 16.580 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 1,768,000 119.802 1,648,1g8 145,140 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 98,000 54.293 43,707 93.430 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 118,000 54.179 63,821 78,20D Rehabiia0on of the 14m Street Pump Station 188,000 72.119 116,881 88,560 Rehabilitation of the'A*Street Pump Station 193.000 622.392 (429,392) 649,400 l Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 72.000 14.111 67.889 54.800 y Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 46,00D 9.241 36.769 41,130 Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal,Beware 23.703 (23.703) 33,000 Goldenwesl Trunk Sewer Replacement 1,310,000 872,668 437.334 944,050 Heil Avenue Interceptor 1,944,000 2.998.682 (1,054,682) 3,368,500 L Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 1T7,000 107,977 9,023 297,500 Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy. 51,000 - 51,000 - Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 25,000 6.838 18.162 38,820 f Capital Improvements,Collections 14.000 - 14,000 V Realignment of S.Anaheim Rd - 40,505 (40,50(1) 40,550 Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehabilitation - 3,483 (3,483) 3,500 Replace SARI Control Gate - 81881 (8,881) 8,900 L Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab. - 702 (7021 710 Miller-Holder Improvements 592,867 (592.857) 592,860 Relocation of Lida Pump station - 101.116 (101.116) 101,120 Goldenwest St.Saver Replacement - 2.238 (2,238) 2,250 �, New Pump Project-Edinger Pump Station - 54,158 (54,158) 54,200 L 1-5 Freeway Widening 259 (259) 260 Newport Boulevard and Pack Coast Highway Widening - 1.339 (1,339) 1,340 Huntington Beach Sewer Abandonment - 1,781 (1,781) 1,800 1 Subtotal-Collections 15,945,000 11,053,730 4,781,270 12,400,310 L✓ Revenue Area 7 Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations-Area 7 4,000 4,482 (482) 6,270 Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment 66,000 3.115 62,885 3.120 L Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. - 13,177 (13,177) 50,800 Tustin Airbam-Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 234.000 1,520 232,480 1,520 McCaw Subtrunk Sewer 8 Pump Station Abandonment 23.000 - 23,000 - i W I u Section 3-Page 2 L CIP Review r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 2000-01 2000-01 2000.01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay 03131/01 Outlay Cull Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach*A" 236,000 S5,288 10%114 Irm Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach'B" 69,000 8,557 60,443 12,000 r Tustin Trunk Improvements 59,000 7,190 51,810 12,000 Orange Trunk Improvements 166,0(10 59,207 106.793 90,000 West Trunklmprovements 9,000 1,749 7,251 3,000 Gisler-Redhill NOM Trunk Improvements 228,000 92,921 136,079 120,000 Mein-Baker Force Main ventilation 30,D00 - 30,000 - Improvements to Main SL P.S, - 14,753 (14,753) 14,760 College Ave PS Parallel Force - 777 (777) 2,00D Bubbler System Upgrade for 3 Pump Stations - 33_00,7.6 (3,076) 3,100 s+ Subtotal-Revenue Areal 1,124,000 aua,elu 828,1e0 448,570 Revenue Area 14 Tustin Airbase-Armstrong Subounk Sewer 688,000 3,909 584,091 3,910 r Improvements to Main St.P.S. - 37938 (37.938) 37,940 Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 588,000 41 7 546,153 41,850 Total Collodion System Improvement Projects 17,557,000 11,401,387 6,155,613 12,890,730 Treatment&Disposal Prelude Collections Facilities Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 634,000 358,883 175,117 438,000 Co-op Projects,Inflow/Infilt Reduction 2,752,000 833.911 1,918,080 2,013,200 Transfer to Other Projects: (44,111) (44,111) - Nuisance Flow Diversion Fee at Newport Dunes - 2,511 (2,511) 19,60D SSES for Three Collection Areas 44,111 77,581 (33.470) 77,600 District-wide Geographical Information System CIS) 30D,000 - 300.000 - r, SSO Training Facility 84.000 .8900000 10,00) Subtotal-Collections Facilities 3.840.000 A88 2,3T/,114 215581400 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 809,000 847,749 (238.749) 931.430 Sunflower Drive Replacement 247.000 56,133 190.867 164,290 Headworks Rehabilitilion/Refurblshment 30,000 29,507 493 31,500 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 133,000 SM721 (375,721) 580,520 Headworks Pump Improvement&Overhaul - 23,351 (23.351) 24,000 Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 26J43311 264311 27,000 Subtotal-Hwchvorks 11019.000 1.491,892 4722 2! 1,728,740 Pdmary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 247,000 85,819 181,181 222,400 �+ Pri.Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities 6,647,000 817,350 5,829,650 943,60D Waste Sidevown,Pump Station Upgrade 567.000 - 567,000 - ClwlarClerifierDriveReplacementtUpgrade 344.000 - 344,000 10,000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 80,000 - 80,000 4,000 .� Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364,D00 364,000 5OOD Subtotal•Primary Treatment 8,249,000 903,169 7,345,831 1,1000 Secondary Treatment Sec Treat.Monitoring&Cntn Sys.Upgrade 901,000 44,604 856,496 44,600 Remo Tridding Filters&Comma New Clarifiers 494.000 158,329 335,671 158,400 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 312.000 - 312,000 - Oaygen Plant Repiacament/Rehabllitaflon 110,000 - 110.000 20,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 200,000 200,000 95,000 Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2,017,000 2 1,814,167 318,000 Section 3-Page 3 wr V 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 2000.01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected W Outlay 03/31/01 Outlay Outlay _ Solids Handling 3 Digestion Demnering Bell Press Rebuild 210,000 105,871 104,129 105,900 u Dewatering Belt Press Extension 230,000 7.095 222,905 7,100 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 3,929,000 3,757.739 171,261 3,904,570 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 2,632,OOD 3,425,331 (793,331) 3,684,740 Digestion 8 Deweledng Rehab./Refurbishment 66,000 - 66.000 - Devhtedng Bell Press Rebuild 326,000 50.123 285.877 61.000 LW High Rafe Digester Mix Pumps Mach.Seals 425.000 70,103 354.897 71,000 Bell Press Automation 91.000 14,121 76,879 141,090 Sludge Grinder Replacement 222,000 160,464 61,536 161,000 Tula Ranch AcAuis 1lOn/Biosolids Management Site 4.774.000 61,639 �4,r71122 36611 3,7D0000 �r Subtotal-Solids Handling S Digestion 2- 90 7,662.486 8,242,514 11,8 Ocean Outfall Systems Outlall Flow Meter Replacement 380,400 169,442 210958 315.020 'W Peak Flow Management 484.400 188.634 295:766 208,150 Effluent Pumping Station Annex 859,200 347,956 511,244 478.000 Investigation and Repair of Ocean Oufall 36,779 (35779) 61.500 Subtotal-Ocean Outfall Systems 1,724,000 741.811 962,189 1,062,670 'W Utllitysystems Electrical Power System Studies 488,000 306,744 182,256 395,000 Standby Power and Reliability MOoficatlons 1,528,OD0 1,063,741 464,259 1,119,20) Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 182 57,000 144,130 (87.130) 174,600 V Imps To Can-Gen Starling Air System 62.000 107,114 (45.114) 119,930 Stomn Dram Database Development and Tagging 100,DD0 - 100,000 - Central Damnation Automaton 101,000 6,543 94,457 26,800 1 Chemical Facility Mods.At Plant No. 1 000.000 897,784 (198,784) 993,100 kw Plant Utfitles Rehabllita0on(Refurbishment - 2,881 (2,881) 3,000 30 Modifications to Elec.8 Control Systems 483,000 9,374 173,626 324,400 High Pressure Compressed Air System 74,000 42,790 31,210 61,790 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 299,000 29,689 269.411 32.480 69 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 312,000 159,813 152.187 215.100 Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120,0DO - 120,000 - East and West RAS Elevator Upgrade 106,000 - 106,000 106.000 Electrical Facility Modifications 8 Safety Upgrades - 4.186 (4,186) 4,200 joy Subtotal-Utility Systems 4.429,000 3,073.689 1,355,311 3 Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 347,000 67.121 279,879 312.300 Faciftes Modificagons for Odor Control 380,000 165,453 214,547 224,400 0ol Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 70.000 774,418 (704,418) 774.420 Automation of Foul Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 - 73.000 - -- Scrubber Chem.Feed System Mods. 430.000 127,200 302,800 170 200 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 1,300,000 1,134,192 165,808 1 Lll Plant Automation 8 Computerization -- Computerized Facility Rem.8 Dwg.System 909,OOD 1,408,103 (497,103) 1,783,550 Power Monitoring and Control Systems 374,000 5.132 368,868 17ADD 1W Plant Reinvenllon/Aummadon Project 2.660,000 2,731.627 (71,627) 2,731,050 CMMS Programming 129.000 8.299 120,701 116,220 Document Management 559,000 22,393 536.607 100.380 1 Data Integration 559,000 117,273 441727 1961610 W Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 157.000 25,768 131:212 29,420 Intranet Appllcation Development 138.000 1.934 134,066 6,170 Internet E-mail Browsing(Website) 91,ODD 4,716 86,286 18,050 Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 134,000 238,093 (104,993) 230.000 W Section 3-Page 4 r CIP Review r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 2000.01 200"1 2000-01 20l Estimated Actualat Remaining Projected Dun 03/31101 Ou�tla Outlay Voice-Data Building Rewiring Rii 33,084 18,916 34,000 Records Management Program 165,000 142,080 22.920 152,560 r Source Control Programming 80,000 69,856 10,144 116.570 Geographic Information System 975,000 142,285 835,715 143,000 Automation Report Publishing 39.000 89.366 (50,368) 105,780 Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 284,000 7,G21 276,979 7,100 r Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 210,000 83,60D 126,400 94,000 SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 157.000 169 16%g31 860 Replacement of Interplant Fiber Doses 445,000 15.484 429,516 34,000 Windom 2000 Migration 333,000 16,783 315.217 38,00D r Office 20DD Upgrade 69,000 - 80,000 69.000 SCADA System Replacement Study 310,001D - 310,0011 310,000 SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 458,0DD 438 457.562 63,000 Plant 2 Dewatering PLC SCADA Upgrade 281,000 - 281,000 281,000 r FIS Upgrade 1,281,000 183.581 1,097.419 219,000 Information Technology Disaster Recovery 91,000 4,245 86,755 5,000 Specialized Process Network 100,0D0 100 000 107 ODD Subtotal-Plant Automation B Computerization 77,099,000 ---ir t<m 8wi-er 530 r' Process Related Spacial Projects Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 20.000 19,809 391 19,620 Thermal Insulation Management Program 49,000 781 48,249 9W Plant O 8 M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 1,608,000 - 1.600.000 8,670 �. Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 447,000 168,017 778,983 207,590 Managed Maintenance Program 348,000 - 348,000 46,000 Special Projects for FY 2000-01: Solids Processing 268,000 247,035 10,365 248,000 Spc PM 0001: Odor ConeolfRegulatory Compliance 651,000 69,325 681.675 70,000 r Special Projects for FY 2000-2001: Liquid Streams 216.000 15011 199981999899 71,000 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 3.596,000 SWU 82 670,600 Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 1,042,000 703.105 .338.895 1,130,280 r Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 1,042,000 814,012 227,988 1,600,070 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 1,042,000 561.127 480,873 1,658,680 Area Classification Studies 1.278,000 1,413.941 (135,941) 2,047,000 Strategic Plan-Phase 2 96,000 61,327 34.673 63,600 r Strategic Plan Program EIR 33.000 27,093 6,907 33,470 Modifications to Extsitng Mach.Systems 476,000 4,492 471,508 4,600 HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No. 1 and 2 737,000 5.635 731,365 103,630 Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 128,000 28.991 98,009 55.000 r Security System Improvements 383.ODO 79.167 303,633 231,620 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project sol 169.795 330.205 310,600 Warehouse Reimention Project 240,000 - 240.000 19,000 Process Safety Management Compliance Program 30.000 - 30,000 Subtotal-Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects ITOW10-60 �3.88 ,885 3, 5 ,3 �7,L5�u Water Management Projects Gmundwaler Replenishment System 2,329,ODD 1,378.103 950,897 1,456,100 Water Conservation 419,000 514,958 (96,95B) 539.400 r Lang Ten Permanent Monitoring Program 3,358,000 34.591 3.323.409 250,450 Subtotal-Water Management Projects 6,105.000 1,927,652 4,177,348 Z,2A5,950 Construction In Progress Completed at 6130100 1,036,495 (1,036,495) 1,036,500 r Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 63,000,000 29,186.387 33,873,613 41,904,240 Capital Equipment Purchases 2,912,000 1,T72,499 1,139,501 2,912,000 Total Collections and Treatment d Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases 0 83.529,000 $ 42,300,273 6 41,168.727 S 57,706,970 s/ Section 3-Page 5 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Let Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life y For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Current Total Approved Jima 30,2000 Year projected Remaining Id project Accumulated Projected Coat at Fu0ga Budget cost cost June 3q 20DI Budget Collection System Immomexem Ptolarts Collecllone w Sane Ana Tnmk Sewer Rehab. 8 7,494,000 $ 75,083 6 51,200 $ 12SM $ 7,367,737 Pwpsebon SCADA Conmmlcetlare Stldy 146,000 - - - 146.000 Continuous Feed chemical Treatment Facility 305000 - - - 308.000 Phase 2 Carmslon Assessment 68.000 - 68,000 1 Tnmk Sewer Mapping project 362,000 - - - 362AOD Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sever 5,007,000 29,039 95.380 124.429 4,88Z571 Carbon Cnyn Savor and Pump Set Abandonment Z6851000 e5,185 51.000 116,185 2,588,815 Santa Ara River Interceptor Relief Seen, 11,853,000 38.806 248.800 287208 11,60,794 Ronabllfati n of Outlying Purp Stations 804,000 348,957 12,73D 361,697 442,3D3 Yd Santa Ana Paler lnerceper Realignment and Prokc. 49,787,000 655,437 1,147,000 1,803,437 47,983,563 Taft Breech Inpraionemb 4,742,OOD 9,386 7,000 16.385 4,725.614 Ahwod SubWnk improvements 1,DD,000 62,821 90,400 153,021 1,735,979 iL Eudld Relief lmprwemems-Reach W 10,831,00D 13.510 - 13,510 10,817,490 Replacement of Miler-HakerTmNk Senor Siphon IAKOOD K434 BOD,000 954.434 1,041.WB OrneWWestern Subtunk Relief Sewer 1232,000 SZ585 64,750 117,315 1,114,685 RehadlUaeon of the Magrola Trunk Sewer 10,354,OOD 7,531.534 341,820 7,873,354 2,48D,646 Rehadlltatlan of Mgce Tnmk Sewer,Phase 12,127,O01) - - 12,127,000 (d MlbNldder Tnmk SewerSyslem,Reach l 10,897,OO1) 7,72g75E 2,691,B00 10,416.555 280.444 Rehabilitation of tine Seal Beach Pump Seli 3,083,OOD - - - 3,0113,000 Rehadiltaeon of the WmWde Pump Station 1.619,000 148 49.430 4S678 1,689,422 More.To Mgndla Reiei Sewer in Western Ave. 209,001) - 1,600 1,601) 207,40D V Big Canyon OBslte Sewer Rehadlle0on 2,714,000 4,399 16,580 20,919 ZM021 Replacement of Balk Bay Tnmk Sewer 8,095,000 25%236 1d5,140 430,376 7,664,624 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 3p80,001) 9.940 93,430 103370 3,376,63D I Reparenant of the Ratlty Pont Pump Station 4,124,001) 7.549 78200 85,749 4,038251 60 Rehnblie0on of me loth Sheet Pump station 2,211,OOD 5.286 88.550 93,838 2,117,164 ReaWlitation of dre-A•Stoat Pump Station Z248,000 4,205 649,400 653.605 1,594,395 RehadlleBm of cite Bay Stage Pump Station 1.094.000 - 54,800 54,800 1,039.= Rehabililaeon of Se Crystal Owe Pump Station 306,000 369 41,130 41,499 254,501 W Abandonment of AS Twk,Watson and Cal.Sawere 2,176,000 130218 33,000 163218 2,012,782 Gddameest Tnmk Sewer Replacement 4,6D7,OOD 2,472AM 944,050 3,416,613 1,09D,387 Heil Avenue lMercaphx 3,711,OO111 217,604 3,368.500 3.555.104 124.8% Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 3,388,000 48,079 297,500 346,579 3,053,421 J taeral and SewerAndndovrentat Padfic,Coast HW 129,000 - - - 129,000 RBhabi0e8on na of we Edinger Pun 1p99,00D 369 X82D 39,109 1,409,811 Capitallmproenants.ColletAaa 500,000 - - - 500,001) - ReftwentofS.AnaleneRB - - 40.550 40,560 (40,550) Eudld Twk Manhote Rehabilitation 1,954,700 1,51Q728 3,500 1,520,22E 444,472 Replace SARI Canto Gate 757,O0D 784,661 8,900 803,561 (46.561) _ Seal Beach Blvd.Relate. 48D,000 410,E 710 417,602 42,398 Miler-Hddaeproenems 6,344.000 6.027.MO Sezilso e,6211,651) (Z78.680) y Relocation of tldoPump setlon 3,395200 3MA52 101,120 3,491 (97,372) GaMmmast SL Sewer Redeemer! 491,700 368,476 2250 370.728 120.974 Nam Porgl Project-Earlier Pump Station - Boo 54,200 54,790 (54.790) _. 161'reeway Wdeong 67,100 122,755 280 123.016 (55,915) Newport Bcule4rd and Pacific Coast hWy Widening 1,207,800 2284,576 1.340 229 418,216 (1,078, 6) )+' Hwtinglnn Beach Sewer AND dormant 538,70D 198.901) 1800 20D,700 3M.OtO Subtotal-Coledere 1 13 3{p 145252.6r2 Revenue Am Rehabilitation of Cutiyig Pump Stations-Am7 395,000 70O.Wif 6,270 714,778 (318,778) W Rarynet tall Pump Station Abandonment 128,000 Man 3.120 68,809 67,191 _ Smikomer Interceptor Mardoe Rehab. 5,387,000 114,024 50,800 164,824 5222,176 1�arl W Section 3-Page 6 f W CIP Review r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Currant Tate) r Approved June30,2000 Yea Projected Rerrelning ProJect FcswnWated Projected Cost at Future Budget cost Cost Jurno,W 2001 11 TusOn Alrbase-AnreVog Subbunk Senor fnT,W ----977-9 -TMT j6.599 1,633 1 Givler-Redill Truk Relocation 5,704.000 - - 5,704,000 McCaw SuElnmk Sewer B Reno,Sletlon Abendmment 1,273,000 - - - 1,273,000 GleferReOhlll Trunk lnpraveaiernts,Reach 4.025,OOD 29.864 130,000 159,W4 3.666,138 CleorAtid11l System lrtprovertents,Reads-B' 5.013.00D - 12,000 12,000 5,001,ODO r Tuetin Trunk Improvements 3,656,000 - 12,000 12,000 3,644,OOD Orange Trunk lrrpmvemonls 3,94ZOOO 29,675 90.000 119,676 3.82Z325 Weal Trunk lnpmrenents 495,000 3.000 SODO 493.00D Glsbr-RedhillMUN Trunk Inproiemanb 5,704,000 39,418 180,000 159,418 5,501= Rgeeoenued of the College Ave.Prop Station 4,717,000 - 4,717,000 r Rehabldadon of the MacArthur Pump Station 1,354,000 - - 1,351,000 Wn,8aker Farce Main Vmgatien 30,O110 30,OOD Inprmononb to Mdn SL P.S. 1,086.6se 1.Z23,132 14.760 1.287.892 (1S1$12) College Ave PSParallel Force 1,W7,OOO 81,483 2.000 83,483 1,793,517 r Subtler System Upgra<IeM 3 Punt)StaOms 3100 3,100 100 Subiabl-Revenue Am 7 M.W.2K Revenue Area 14 Tueen N,baso-Amabvng Subinmk Server 4,e21,000 234= 3,910 238,112 4,382,888 r Inprm�ema�b to Mean St P.S. Z�794,320 31 197 37940 3,183137 Subtefl-Rerenu,Nee 14 9 Total Collection System lmprwsmeM Projects 248,597,2W 40.742AW 12W0.730 Si 192,983981 Treatmem S Disoosal Projects r Collectors Faclliees SUWwd Truk Serer Rehabilitation 30,63D.000 12Z482 438,00D SWAW 30,069,518 Coop Projects,Imordnlilt Reduction 144,750,000 244,482 Z013,2W 2,257,602 14Z49Z318 Tlaaalere,011w Proierts: (140.254) - - (140,264) r Ndsanaa RovDiversion Fac at Newxd Cures 40,000 20,397 19,500 39.9917 3 SSESfa Three Collection Areas 100,254 2,378 77,600 79,976 20,308 OtvMC-Wda Geograp!Jrallnfoi Pion System(GIS) 2.500.000 - - - Z500,000 SSOTrani g Fedlity 64,000 - 10,000 10.Om 54,000 r Rehab B Upgrade of Elio Ave.Rnp Station 1799,600 1725 1.728 1,797.772 Subtotal-Collec6om Fanilrdes { roadworks Grit Auger Repboevenl 1.088,000 106,604 931,430 1,040.034 47.966 Sunnoner Drive Replacement 407,OD0 71,953 154.290 226,243 180,757 Headwla RehahilltatlaJReomshment 4.330,000 416 31.500 31,916 4,298,084 Haaalmdslnpowmrenb at Plant W.2 74.118,0110 319,944 sm'sm 880,464 73,237,536 Headrorlo Pimp lnpwerrent&Overhaul 300,000 200,189 24.000 224,189 75,811 r Rehab of scam Savage Rana Motoe 2W OW 71,219 T700OZ7000 98219 110.781 Subtotal-roadworks 1'rzo 7w 240 ,W6 ".950,935 Primary Treahrent Fadlitles kMdificatims for Ode Central 276,000 13.191 2ZZ400 235,591 40.409 Pd.awifiers 16318 Related Facilities 75,450,000 3,416,305 943,800 4,358,905 71.091,095 Waste Sldesbeam Rare Station Upgrade 1,0se,000 - - - 1,OW,OOD Grader Center Drava ReplarertenUlJpgmde 5,840,000 - 10,000 10,000 S8WDDD Sludge Oendry War Upgrades 8D%ODO - 4,000 4,000 79%ODD Sludge level Masurenem Gee. rudeiation 354,000 500D 5000 359,OOD Subtotal-Money Treaunanl Secondary Troahmrd Sec Treat Monitoring 6 CrM Sys,Upgrade 4,317.000 468,597 44,600 511,197 3,805,BW Rehab Tredig Rhos B Construct New CaMlers 21,001,000 18,746 158.400 177,146 20,823,854 r ACEveed Sludge Ram Rehateilita0en 3.745.000 - - - 3,745.000 Oxygen Plant PeplacernereVRehat litaffm 110.000 - 20,000 20,Om 90.000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Sabctor Shay 51 OOD 95.000 0.000 416,000 SubloNl-Second re arYTreaOnt 0 �3 gW ---U'!3, 4- 9.657 r Section 3-Page 7 u 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life LI For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Curtant Total Approved June30,2000 year Projected Rerralning rr Pmjed Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost cost Jwe30.2001 Budget Solids Handling&Digestion Don,eterim Belt Press Feebuld SM000 279,736 105.900 365.636 14Z364 ri Devalebg Belt Press Edasion 230.000 - 7.100 7,10D 222,900 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plan No.2 17,234,000 6,42Z299 3,9D4,570 10.326,869 6,907,131 _ Soils Storage and TAW,Lose"FadlBy, 15,120,000 1.3l)4,216 3,894,740 5,079.016 10,040.984 Digestion&Dewalerirg Rehat JFahoibishmen 7,500.000 - - - 7,8go,000 lv Deaztedng Belt Press Retsold 825,00D 255.5M 61,000 31S522 SM478 High Rate Digester MS Pumps Mete.Seals 517,00D 256,988 71p00 327,985 189,D12 Belt Press Automation 17SOOD Sagois 141,090 174,999 1 Sludge GrinderReplamnad 224.00D 16,776 161,ODO 177,776 16,224 Tule Ranch AcyuisfliorV&molds Management Site 9.4150.000 - 3,700,000 3.700.000 6150,000 Subtotal-solids Handling&Digestion B,fi59,506 N,646AW 2ap95�6 32W7,O94 Oman Outfall Systems Cutts]Flow MHe Replacemere 1,124,OD0 107,437 315,020 42Z457 701,543 W Peak Flow Management 4.055.000 63.763 208,160 271,9W 3,783.097 Wi t Pm gong Screw Amex 28.346.000 87,793 478,OD0 W5,793 27,780207 Investigation anti Repair of ocean Cutfall 1.274.600 1.104.694 61.500 1,168,194 108,405 Subtotal-Oman outset Systems 14� 1.364,677 1,05267B 2p26347 3Z373256 ulifity,Systems Elect iml Poxer System Studies 3218.000 1.677,997 395AOO 2,07Z997 1,143,003 Starfy Power arm Reliability Modifications 17,370,000 5=362 1,119200 6,949,562 10.420.438 Cade Tray lmportvmnts at Plants 1&2 25.878,000 879.344 174,000 1,053,944 26,824,058 Imp.To Cero G.Starting Air System 141,000 18.333 119.930 130263 Z737 Slam Drain Database DaMoprnom and Tagging 10D.000 - - 100,000 C,mer _ Central a8mlwimiabon Z964.ODO - 25.800 2%SDO Z9382DO Chemical Facility Mods.Al Ran No.1 3.768,ODO 2,966524 993,100 3.961.624 (193,624) 6d Rant Utilities RehalliliteSpNRafuMshmont 3.360,000 - 3,ODD 3,OD0 3,357,000 &bdfica0as to eeo.&Conbd Systems Z615,000 2,036.632 324,400 Z351.032 253,968 High Primate Compressed Air System 409,000 356,193 51,790 407,983 1,017 1 Gas Compressor Addllm at Plant No.2 907,000 21,10) 3Z480 53,580 853,42D Utilities Fehadlitaim and Refipdshment 3,394,0DO 49,302 215.100 264.402 3,128.595 UMergmund Storage Tank Leak Collection Upgrade 120.000 - - - 17AODO Feet and West RAB Elevator Upgrade 1D8,000 - 105,000 105,000 Decbkal Facility Modificabore&Safety Upgrade.; 44Z9DO 248,465 42DO 25ZG65 190235 Subtotaal-why Systarc 655.790.900 14AS6,252 6564,600 17.650.551 48.146048 iul Otlar Control Related Projects Facilities Nrxtifimgare for Odor l:omd 384.00D 16.739 31Z30D 328.039 65.961 Facilities Moddmtiore for odor Corral 2,686,000 14.394 22A,400 238.794 2447.206 1 l Gampehensino Oda Control Assessment 3.466,000 18Z898 774.420 967.318 Z508,682 LI Aatureicn of Fad Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 - - - 73,000 Saubber Chem.Feed System Nark. 796,000 154,102 170200 324.302 471.696 subtotal-odor Control Related Projects 7AAODO 367,133 1A81.320 1,846,464 5556,5117 iw Plant Automation&Computerization Canputmvetl Facility Fars.&Dw9.System 4.956Om 2.994.448 1,733,550 4,727,998 228,002 Ptmer Monitoring and Control Systems 3.365.000 18,046 17,000 35,046 3.319.954 Ran Relmn=ntiaNAutomation Pged 25,760,00D S,WS,645 Z731,650 8,320295 17,439,705 CLAMS Pmgrdmmkg 490,000 274,082 116,920 391,002 98.998 Donmml Managenenl 884.000 476,620 100.350 577.000 287.000 Date integration 4,334,00D 2,039,487 196.510 Z235,997 2,096,003 Strategic Information Architeibae(SIA) 724.000 27ZSU 29,420 3OZO02 421.998 htramt Applmodon Owdocomant 3DDODD 78.834 6.170 85,004 214.995 Intent E-mail greasing(Webste) 300,OD0 169.939 18,060 187,999 112,001 Nehwk Backbone Upgrade ConSnastlon 1A97,ODO 1.004,108 239,OD0 1243,105 253,894 ... IW W Section 3—Page 8 L r CIP Review r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Mine Months Ended March 31,2001 Cunent TOW r Approved Juna30,2000 Year FMJeded Remaining Prolec: Accumulated ProJected Curl at Futum Budget Cost teat Jun 3D,2001 Budget Vctcam Buldig ReMdng 67%= 616,997 30.000 650,997 28,1I03 Rernds Manpemenl Program 255.000 64,445 152,560 217,005 37,995 Saaee Centel Pm®awdrg S7r.000 3 1,433 116.570 451,003 125.997 Geogrdpirc lnformaeon Synen, 4,157.DD0 154,346 143,000 297,346 3.859.6% Automation Report Pudisti g 195,00D 0217 105,780 194,997 3 r Field Flier Optic Lipgadce 6W.00D 2M.M 7,100 251,672 398,328 Field Fiber Optic Tarinal Standardicatlon 325,00D 273,216 84,000 357216 (32.216) SCADA Oanmmiaeas-EOcnet Stutly 157.000 141 am 1,001 155,999 Replacement of interplant Fiber Oplie, 499,OOD - 34,000 34,000 465,000 Windays 200D htgakin 333,00111 - 38.0110 MOOD 295,000 Office 21D00 Upgmde 691000 - 69.000 69,OOD SCADA System Rplacannt Study 310,000 - 310,000 310,001) - SCADA GpNa Tagging Updsle 670.000 - 63,000 63AW 607,000 Plaid 2 Dwaleing PLC SCADA UPgrdde 291,000 - 281,000 281,000 - �' FIS Upgrade 1.851,000 219,000 219,001) 1.632.000 INameden Teciuglegy,Disaster Recwery 140,000 - 5,000 5,OOD 135,000 Specialized Prooass NeMadr 107,ODD - 107.0110 107,00111 - Subbtal-Plant Automation B Camputertedlon S3A46.000 10.700.158 8 630 32.182,316 r Prareaa Related Special Projects Standard Specifatas Redsicns and Updains 200,000 433A53 19.620 453,073 (253.073) ThamW Irsulallon Matsgament Program 800,01DO - am 830 799,200 Fart O B M Manual and SOP project-PtsseI 4,000.000 1.330 8,670 10,000 3.990.000 r HamNas EneW Corbel Pieced,ms 1.190,000 42414 2a7.59D 250.004 989,996 Managed Malntmane,Proper, a70.0DO 45.000 45.000 825,000 Spacial PmJeds for FY 200001: Solids Piceeniing 675.000 702257 MOOD 950257 (275,261) Spc Prot OD01: Oda CMtrWRegWalay Compliance 651,000 1298.110 70.000 1,368,110 (717,110) Special Pmlects b FY 200D-20D1: Ugtdd Steams 215,000 - 71,000 71000 WODO SuMolal.Process Related Special Prolects 8.801,000 2,477,554 670,SB0 31N 5,152,758 Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects Facribee Erpreiaig Projects-Joint 20,000,000 889,725 1.130280 2,000.005 17,999.995 ,r Facilges Engineering Projetle-Fanl2 20.00D,ODO 399,933 1,600.070 2.000.003 17,999.997 Faci011es Englrlesig Frcieda-Merit 20,000,000 341,320 1,658,680 2.000.000 13,00(1.000 Are Culeffici Studes 27,919,000 748.814 2,047,000 2,795.814 25,123,186 Stree9lc Plan-Place 2 2.194.000 2.008.044 63.6w 2.071.644 122.356 r, Strategic Plan Regain EIR 1,119,000 817287 33,470 850.727 M,273 Modricalm to F)dslug Melt.SysWn 2,894,000 253,822 4,5W 258.322 2,435,678 HVAC Epdpmd Replacemant at Rants No.t arid 2 757.000 - 103.630 103,630 653,370 Landscape and lmgation at Fart W.2 810,ODD - 55,000 55,OW 755,ODO r SeadN System Improvements 1,334.000 482,384 231,620 714.004 619,996 Seal Cap.Ec9p.Replacetn eel Prated 740,000 189.408 310.600 600.008 239,992 Wareheuie Reinvention Project 6DO.000 - 19,000 19.000 551,000 Rocese Safely Managanent Compliance Progam 30.000 30,000 SuMotal-Miarallaneen B Support PmJects 98,197,000 5,110,707 725 Aw 13,388,157 64JI28R41 Water Management Projects Grwndmur Rplemshment System 178222,000 2,584,346 1,456.100 4,040.446 174,181,5&1 Wales Ccnserabcn 4,644." 9M,462 539,400 1.492.862 3.151,139 Lang Term Permanent Monliodrg Pnlgmm 5.000,000 250,450 250.450 4,749,550 r Subtotal-Water Marege lent Prole to 187,866,00D 3,W7,SW 22d5,950 5,783,758 182, SZM construction In Piogmss Complaxid at 6130100 MIGM49 1,036.5DO 55.106,967 (55,10r4967) TOW Treatment and Disposal Projects 8BZ6BS,ODD 11OA51,899 41,904,2d0 152,359,139 730,325M r, capital Equlpwnt Purchases 2,912,ODD 2,912.000 2,912,000 TOW Cdtectlens aa1 Treaarent 8 Disposal Projects and Capital EqulPrrent Pwdra5es $1,132,194,2110 6151,197,388 $ 57,706,970 2208,900.358 9 923 M842 r r Section 3-Page 9 u 2000-01 Third Quarter Report L i ! V IJ r V This Page Left Intentionally Blank L 60 L Li V ) i V i V v i LI 1 r SOCUM 9—Pape 10 L u' Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 ,r Operating Budget Review 2000-01 Yeaf'To• Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 34,504,000 $ 23,961,732 $ 10,542,268 69.45% Connection Fees 4,823,000 4,593,910 229.090 95.25% r Other Fees 74,258,000 41,799,026 32.458,974 56.29% Sale of Capacity Rights 6,340,100 6,340,100 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 31.410,000 34,013,334 (2,603,334) 108.29% .. Total Revenues $ 151,335,100 $104,388,002 $ 46,967,098 68.96% OUTLAYS: r. Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 65,972,000 $ 30,958.886 $ 35,013,114 46.93% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 17,554,000 11,401,387 6,152,613 64.95% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 40,737,000 26,161.000 14,576,000 64.22% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 46,000,000 35.011,168 10,988,842 76.11% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,546,000 7,570.262 1,974,738 79.31% Total Outlays $ 179,808,000 $111,102.693 $ 68.705.307 61.79% r Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131/01 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction In Progress $ 25.521,061 $ 11,401,387 $ - $ 36,922,448 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 89.018,262 30.968,888 119,977,148 r Sub-Total 114,539.323 42,360,273 156.899.596 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 10,398,596 - - 10,398,596 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 357,1D4,332 - - 357,104,332 Treatment Facilities 600,045.285 - - 600,045,285 Disposal Facilities 00,108,851 - - 90,108,851 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 111,354,203 111,354,203 Sub-Total 1,169,011,267 1,169,011,267 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,283,550,590 $ 42,360,273 $ - $1,325,910,863 Section 4-Page 1 V 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review u For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Operating Budget Review tr 2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-0ate Budget Date Budget %of Budget v REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ 31.046,000 $21.692,684 $ 9,353.316 69.87% Connection Fees 4.459,000 3,868,844 690,156 86.76% Other Fees 66,641,000 37,664,687 27,876,313 57.47% Sale of Capacity Rights 2,856.200 2,856,200 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 28,312,000 30,888,651 (2,576,651) 109.10% 1 Total Revenues $ 132,214.200 $94,114,866 $ 38,099,334 71.18% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 56,987,000 $26.729,902 $ 30,267,098 46.91% ,y Collection Activity Capital Improvements 15,843,000 11.063,730 4,779,270 69.83% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 37,735,000 24,291,373 13,443,627 64.37% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 40,742200 30,561,239 10,180,961 75.01% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 7,876,000 6,197,665 1,678,335 78.69% Total Outlays $ 159,183,2D0 $98,843,909 $ 60,339291 62.09% � Capital Facilities Budast Review W Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activiy Construction in Progress $ 23,952,851 $11,063,730 $ - $ 35,016,581 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 78,487,024 26,729,902 105216.926 Sub-Totaf 102,439,875 37.793,632 140233,507 W PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): - Land and Property Rights 7,535.709 - - 7535,709 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 281,103,225 - - 281:103,225 W Treatment Facilities 518,081,821 - - 518,081.821 Disposal Facilities 77,803,069 - - 77,803,069 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 96,584,044 96,584,044 W Sub-Total 981,107,868 981,107,868 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,OB3,547,743 $37,793,632 $ $1,121,341,375 y V L I W Section 4-Page 2 Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 r Operating Budget Review 2000-01 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Data Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Alloca0ons/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,458,000 $ 2,269,048 $ 1,188,952 65.62% Connection Fees 364,000 716,379 (352,379) 198.81% Other Fees 8,717,000 4,126,319 4,590.681 47.34% Sale of Capacity Rights 320,900 - 320.900 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2,156,000 2,786,626 (630,626) 129.25% .. Total Revenues $ 15,015,900 $ 9,898,372 $ 5,117.528 65.92% .r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 6,960,000 $ 3.263,067 $ 3.696,933 46.88% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 1,123,000 295,810 827,190 26.34% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2,840,000 1,813,351 1,026.649 63.85% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,038,800 3.434,595 604,205 85.04% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 1,451,000 1.165,169 295,831 79.61% �• Total Outlays $ 16,412,800 $ 9.961,992 $ 6,450.808 60.70% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/00 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,566.448 $ 295.810 $ - $ 1,862,258 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 8,314,562 3,263,067 11,577,629 Sub-Total 9,881.010 3,558,877 13.439,887 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 2,364.394 - - 2.354.394 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46,622,800 - - 46,622,800 Treatment Facilities 63,242,673 - - 63,242,673 Disposal Facilities 9,497.554 - - 9,497,554 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 11,416,179 11,416,179 Sub-Total 133.133,600 133,133,600 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $143,014,610 $ 3,558,877 $ $146.573.487 r Section 4-Page 3 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Operating Budget Review y 2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: (r Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - $ - $ N/A Connection Fees 8,687 (8,687) N/A Other Fees - 8.020 (8,020) N/A tat Sale of Capacity Rights 3,163,000 - 3,163,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 942,000 338.057 603,943 35.89% 1 I Total Revenues $ 4,105,000 $ 354,764 $ 3,750,236 8.64% OUTLAYS: V Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 2,025,000 $ 965.917 $ 1.059,083 47.70% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 588.000 41,847 546,153 7.12% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 162,000 56,276 105,724 34.74% I Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.219.000 1,015.324 203,676 8329% W Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 218,000 217,428 572 99.74% Total Outlays $ 4,212,000 $ 2.296,792 $ 1.915,208 54.63% L Capital Facilities Budget Review L Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101 L CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,762 $ 41,847 $ - $ 43,609 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,216.676 965,917 - 3,182,593 Sub-Total 2,218,438 1.007.764 - 3,226,202 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 508,493 - - 508,493 L Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,378,307 - - 29,378,307 Treatment Facilities 18,720,791 - - 18720791 Disposal Facilities 2,808.228 - 2:808:228 L General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3,353,980 3,353,980 Sub-Total 54,769,799 - - 54,769,799 L Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 56.988,237 $ 1.007,764 $ - $ 57,996,001 L L I Section 4-Page 4 L r Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 r Percent Actual or Rudget Remalning AeWal 2000-01 Through Through moo-ol Through Increase r Budget 0313112001 0313112001 Budget 03/3112000 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves $1,531,700 $1.809,121 WA WA $1,592.701 $ 216.420 Revenues 2. In-Lieu Premiums 1.246.500 934,875 75% 311,625 1,125,0D0 (190,125) 3. Interest B Miscellaneous 50,000 72.157 144.31% (22.157) 40,438 31,719 4. Allocationfrom Omer Funds 700,000 68.669 9.81% 631,331 437,629 (368.96M r S. Total Revenues 1,996.500 1,075.701 53.88% 920.799 1,603,067 (527,366) r Expenses 6. BenefiWClaims 300,000 17,553 5.85% 282,447 304,232 (286,679) 7. Contractual Services 3.500 900 25.71% 2,600 981 (81) 8. Legal Services 500.000 234.126 46.83% 266,874 395,712 (161,686) r 9. Professional Services 3,000 5,086 169.53% (2,086) 2,130 2,956 10. Supplies S Other 500 - 0.00% Boo 177,614 (177,614) 11. Service Department Allocation 1,000.000 1,233,567 123.36% (233.567) 529.660 704,007 12. Subtotal Expenses 1,807,000 1,491232 82.53% 315,768 1,410,229 81.003 13. Excess Loss Policy 112,000 75,575 67.48% 36.425 83,619 (8.044) 14. Total Expenses 1,919,000 1,566,807 81.65% 352,193 1.493,848 72,959 15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 77,500 (491,106) -633.69% 568,606 109,219 (600.325) 16. Ending Reserves $1,609.200 $1.318.015 81.90% N/A $1.701,920 $(383.905) r r Section 5-Page 1 2000-01 Third Quarter Report Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review W For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2000-01 Through Through 2000-01 Through Increase Budget 03/3112001 03/3112001 Budget 03131/2000 (Oeereasel 1. Beginning Reserves $336.600 $302,064 N/A N/A $812,383 $(510,319) V Revenues 2. In-Lieu Premiums 1310,000 232,500 75.00% 77,500 232,496 4 1 3. Interest B Miscellaneous 25,000 35,540 142.16% 10540 14,957 20,583 W 4. Total Revenues 335,000 268,040 80.01% 66,960 247,463 20,587 W Expenses V 5. Bene6ts/Clalms 250,000 297,542 119.02% (47.542) 240,062 57,480 6. Contractual Services 25,000 18,750 75.00% 6,250 18,750 - 6w 7. Legal Services 30,000 16,244 54.15% 13,756 22,218 (5,974) 8. Professional Services 35,000 8,663 24.44% 26,447 32,506 (23,953) L 9. Supplies B Other - - WA - 34,677 (34,677) 10. Service Department Allocations 50,000 60,282 120.56% (10,282) 183,600 (123,318) L 11. Subtotal Expenses 390,000 401,371 102.92% (11,371) 531,813 (130,442) 12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 25,927 115.23% (3,427) 16,023 9,904 L 13. Total Expenses 412,500 427,298 103.59% (14,798) 547.836 120.538 V 14, Excess Revenue(Expenses) (77.500) (159,258) 205.49% 81,758 30( 0,383) 141.125 15. Ending Reserves 259100 142806 55.12% N/A 572000 $(369.194) L L W W L Section 5-Page 2 i LW Orange County Sanitation District (714 ) 962-2411 www • ocsd • com mailing address : P • O . Box 8127 Fountain Valley , California 92728-8127 street address : 10844Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley , California 92708-7018 OCSD 03/31/01