HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-23 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
May 16, 2001
puma: NOTICE OF MEETING
(714)9e2-2411
(7141982-0359 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
malling t ldro n
Foun[an Valleyy�CA WEDNESDAY, May 23, 2001 — 7:00 P.M.
92728.8127
Kreet s Aoi ta:
10
844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley CA DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Agencies
0 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
Cities District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anehaiii
9ree
suede Perk
Lypraea -Qzl..v
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Bearden Beach Board Sucre
Huntington beech
kiiii.
La Hub.
e Palooma
Loa Alamitos
Newport Beech
orange
Pr Ann A Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming o Meetins
SeeleefBurns 8e,chacll
$dMBa
T.oppar,
VIP Part OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 6, 2001 at 5:00 p.m.
",a Linda
County 4r orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, June 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m.
Units, Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
Costa Meat SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, June 11,2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD
Midway City
FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 13,2001 at 5:00 p.m.
Water Districts
broadly Reach STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 27,2001 at 5:00 p.m.
To maintain world-claw leadership in wastewater and water resource management.
m
�m
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
June June 27, 2001
July *July 18, 2001
August August 22, 2001
September September 26, 2001
October October 24, 2001
November November 28, 2001
December •December 19, 2001
January January 23, 2002
February February 27, 2002
March March 27, 2002
April April 24, 2002
May May 22, 2002
'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
Nead\daUllwp.dt WdminXBSUgenda\2001 Meeting NoUwWAN5.2.doc
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
May 16, 2001
goal NOTICE OF MEETING
17141962-2411
figic
014196211356
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1ensueCsel... 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
.111,g address:
Faun[°�Vall y..� WEDNESDAY, May 23, 2001 — 7:00 P.M.
92728-6127
Ararat address:
10e44 Ellis Avenue
Fvun[a2 Valley,0A
9270BA01B DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Agencies
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
Cities District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Lypress
F4unmin Valley -
Fullerton
Barden Oraea oard Secre
Hundngtan Beach
Irvine
La Habra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Ahewpor[Broth
Orange
Retired Tentatively- Scheduled Uocoming Meetings
septa Ana
seal Beach
Blanton
Tustin
Win Park OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 6,2001 at 5:00 p.m.
Yorba Linda
County of orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday,June 7, 2001 at 5:00 p.m.
sanitary Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
fosse Mesa SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,June 11,2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD
Midway of
FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 13,2001 at 5:00 p.m.
Water Districts
Irvine aanth STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 27,2001 at 5:00 p.m.
To maintain world-class leadership in wae<ewa[er and water resource management.
• Ob
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
June June 27, 2001
July 'July 18, 2001
August August 22, 2001
September September 26, 2001
October October 24, 2001
November November 28, 2001
December `December 19, 2001
January January 23, 2002
February February 27, 2002
March March 27, 2002
April April 24, 2002
May May 22, 2002
*Meetings; are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
14eadWaWl\wp.dWWdmin\BS%Agenda12001 Meeling NoOmWN5.2.doc
I !
TO: Harbor Quality Committee
FROM: Jack Skinner
DATE: April 28, 2001
RE: OCSD's 301(h) waiver
I am writing because I have concerns about the re-issuing of the Orange
County Sanitation District's 301(h) waiver.
I recently learned that the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)
performed a study in the fall of 1996 known as the 20-Meter Study. This
study tested ocean water quality on ten different days between September 26,
1996, and November 25, 1996, to determine if the wastewater plume was
moving shoreward. There were five sample sites located at the 20-meter
depth contour. Three samples were taken at each sample site (at surface,
bottom and middle depths). No samples were taken closer to shore than the
20-meter depth at the time of this study with the exception of the samples
taken at ankle depth right at the beach.
To the best of my knowledge, this study was never released to the public or
included in OCSD's yearly marine monitoring reports. However, this
information was available to OCSD before they applied for the renewal of
their current waiver, which was issued in June 1998. The study was only
discovered by the public in January 2001.
The findings of this study are troubling because it appears that, intermittently,
the wastewater plume moves toward the beaches. On November 20, 1996,
bacterial readings indicate that the plume did reach the beaches in West
Newport. This is shown on the enclosed chart. Note the elevated total
coliforms at the Newport Beach shoreline sampling locations and the
exceedingly elevated fecal coliform levels taken near the ocean bottom at the
20-meter sampling sites, stretching all the way from off the Huntington Beach
power plant to off the Newport pier.
Also enclosed is a picture apparently showing a composite of the
bacteriological results of the 20-meter fecal coliform study. The ocean
bottom fecal coliform samples equaled or exceeded 400 MPN in the area
circled in red, showing that the wastewater field comes very close to
Newport's beaches.
iY
Recently, a more extensive plume study was done on November 27, 2000, by
OCSD, the results of which are shown on the enclosure marked Figure 28.
Again, it shows that the wastewater plume is coming toward the shore,
especially near the power plant in Huntington Beach. Please note how far the
plume has moved toward shore from the end of the outfall.
Dr. Stanley Grant of UCI has performed an extensive review of the
bacteriological data and has concluded that since a bacterial pulse arrives at
the beach at station 9N during flood tides before any bacteria has entered the
ocean from the Talbert Marsh that this is further evidence of an offshore
source of bacterial pollution of the beach. This is because the high tides act
as a temporary barrier, preventing the marsh water from entering the ocean.
Extensive studies of offshore currents are planned for this summer.
Based on the above evidence, I believe that there should not be a renewal of
OCSD's 301(h) waiver.
These studies indicate that there is a strong possibility that, intermittently,
bacterial contamination from the outfall can reach the shoreline and thereby
pose a threat to swimmers. It is for OCSD to prove otherwise.
Secondary treatment with activated sludge removes about 95 percent of the
viral pathogens. The lower suspended solids present in secondary treated
sewage allow chlorination to be more effective should that prove necessary.
Perhaps the only safe solution is to treat the entire effluent to the tertiary level
to be used for reclamation purposes and eliminate all ocean discharges.
Treating sewage to less than the secondary level becomes a disincentive to
reclamation since all reclaimed water must go through the secondary process
and beyond.
In the past, Nancy and I have opposed the granting of 301(h) waivers to
sanitation districts with short outfalls but until recently, we had not been
concerned about the Orange County Sanitation District's discharge four and a
half miles off the coast. However, we have had second thoughts about the
safety of OCSD's ocean discharge because of recent evidence that there is
shoreward movement of the wastewater plume.
Jack Skinner
1" Y � .1"<.F r � {'J.�uYY*3 ! .r.#"Y y»,���t'. � s sfs c"� t e r ;� 'tN rie s �>t
Fh. . ••�t}t5 �s� f ylf Gy,.y A r s >€ye • y •+ t�l � I x r * `9�t a'• r 3
.s f ,�. ! }n 't 2y �'J,c'�^� rf i'� }4./��.a r ..i S � �r is }', , �;ems; fs ' f� '-<
� �7�� � I � t x fr'f;�F ' ..� t
;� {4 � y w Y 'Y
�'�`..es.6� s.: C^.r 'yw ..r yY - .,r .t,. .f'- . r��,y'. Y e.4�4..��a.-3
Yl s > 37s*s :n + `� �` 4k ��+ �a�s{f r +tt -�� '>�°.us
1 1 1 �z� "� �n�is'�*' �"�"z ^W � t 'SLx"'�Ty,�. m� . >tJ��a ��s �&��t�w`i
® t iy m;S s �, Qx.:yYg ceZr � i f ` x�4tiY
;.1;• �3ps i tti F�', 'le �' <..1a+_. zc}, 4" ��i�' �°v,�'�}��.�
� < ^�'._A� .fhb.+ � fir! K Py
® �'P '�..}�' } K .� iK
�e it � _ 1 ;3. r1�L N'xi� G _ � ���.�� � 43 ������� ,I ,
�� f i.
1 ^�f r `yyCr: / t s tS
l� Yr,� i. _ ® -. x�� -3
. 1 it f®alyk{>�jit F2. . ?
1 , e 4'
t
1 �Gi��,' 1 n � 2`'�u4vt
� 1 1Yi - II I � `s
II it �
II I
II 1
SII t
it} _
` 111 I - ,I �11�.
1 1
II
� • • - • �
of, 1996)
Bolsa Chico
State $each Santa AfI2
River
F-I.A I'd
xuntington
Beach
p DI PLANT
No- 2
Newport
�p
` Naw}wst Bay
Present. / Beach
?'ZO MPN
h�tam
Crystal Coda
"a State Pack
y y
i
Tabl Cogtorm Bottom Contour
nog trap.i dl
2,00
- •.oo i 'vim �i!!m+...
/ \
osa
r u /
Bottom Contour
E c� 4 9 udr(rH
tl09 innabrrtiad� �
..Oo
_ a.a
0
Figure 28. Bottom depth surface planes of Top)Total Coliform(log transformed)and
Bottom)E.Coli(log transformed(for November27,2000.
o�s•�r sa.x�w.uaa,c.�u.
Health Dangers Arise From Pumping Of Sewage Into Deep Sea
From Ocean Update September 1999 Vol. 4, No. 9
Paul R. Epstein, Center for Health and the Global EmAronmenl,
Harwrd Medical School. Tel (617)432-0493
An outbreak of cholera on the southern Coast of Bangladesh in 1992
may presage the risks posed to dewloped and less-developed countries
alike from deep-sea dumping of human sewage, according to some
researchers. Scientists haw noted that the 1992 outbreak was
accompanied by an upwelling that brought deep-sea water to the
surface near the Bangladeshi coast. In recent years, researchers have
discovered a variety of pathogenic microbes, many usually found only
in human feces, at unexpected depths of the ocean. Marine scientist
D. Jay Grimes of the University of Southern Mississippi says that a
wriety of Nmses that infect the human gastrointestinal tract-
including polioAms and rotaNrus -haw been identified In ocean
water samples taken below 1,0000 meters (3,300 feet). In the late
1969s, Sager M. Goyal of the University of Minnesota isolated gut
bacteria from samples obtained as sewage-sludge dumping sites more
than 170 kilometers offshore from New York City, 30 months after the
sites were closed to dumping. The bacteria were resistant to several
antibiotics, showing that they originated from humans who were taking
the drugs.
TI,unEey,Mry W,3W1 Amm1u OnOne:Jon V] V�q: l
I
Kyle, Penny
From: Lawson, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, May 23,2001 8:24 AM
To: Kyle, Penny
Subject: FW: Director List
—061nal Message—
From: Dennis Baker lmallto:bakerdj@mindspnncwrnj
Sent: Wednesday,May 23,2001 7:54 AM
To: foenfa ation@ocsd.wrn
Cc: Sonja Wassgren
Subject: Director List
I am unable to attend tonight's board meeting. Please present the following to the board.
Members of Orange County Sanitation District Board,
The OCSD is"disposing"of a valuable commodity each day. Over 600 acre-feet of valuable water go out the
Ocean Outfall per day. The cost to buy this amount of water from the Metropolitan Water District, at$450 an
acre-foot, is $270,000. That's $275,000 a day. The ground water level in the Orange County aquifer is
dangerously low, and continues to fall, so it is not only a matter of the monetary loss,but the actual quality and
availability of water for the county. The move to reclaim some of this water is commendable. This move should
be expanded to reclaim all of this valuable water. The cost to reclaim this water is competitive, $420 per acre-
foot. Full secondary treatment of the county's effluent would be a contributing part of this full reclamation. By
instituting full secondary treatment now,the district is taking a positive step towards a greater goal of full
reclamation of valuable water for the whole county.
Dennis Baker
Corona del Mar
949.675.2199
bakerdj@,mindspring.com
t
Treatment Issues and the §301(h) Provision of the Clean Water Act
History/Background
The Clean Water Act is a 1972 amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
The 1972 Clean Water Act requires publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) to use
secondary treatment prior to discharge to surface waters.
In 1977, Congress added section 301(h) to the Clean Water Act. It allowed qualified
POTWs employing rigorous pretreatment and extensive ocean monitoring programs to
discharge into deep ocean waters that had large tides and substantial currents allowing
for greater dilution and dispersion than inland and estuarine water bodies.
OCSD received the 301(h) approval in 1985. In 1989, the district filed a 301(h)-renewal
application and on February 22, 1990 the 1985 permit expired and was administratively
extended. In June 1998, the United States Environmental Agency and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a new NPDES permit for a five-year
period.
The 301(h) provision of the Clean Water Act allows for a slight increase in the amount of
total suspended solids and biological oxygen demand. These slight increases are in the
concentration, but there is still a limit in the overall mass that can be discharged into the
ocean. Recipients of the 301 (h) permit are also required to meet stringent criteria
including: protection of the beach and nearshore recreational activities, maintenance of a
balanced native fish population, an extensive ocean monitoring program, and a rigorous
pretreatment program in order to met secondary water equivalency for removal of toxics.
Key Message
OCSD is committed to protecting the health and safety of the public and marine life. At
the same time, the district recognizes its responsibility to act as an environmental
caretaker in addressing the larger issue of balancing impacts upon the air, land, energy,
and water.
In light of recent issues surrounding ocean water closures and new theories regarding
the possible movement of OCSD's treated wastewater plume, we are currently in the
process of researching the dynamics of the ocean and how and where the treated
wastewater travels. Should it be determined that the treated wastewater released 4
miles off shore is reaching recreational waters, OCSD will change operations. There are
options for treatment level changes that can occur while maintaining the 301(h)
provision.
Our goal is to make sure than any decision to make a treatment level change is based
on science, and that fee increases charged to residents and business owners for the
treatment level changes is money well spent to protect public health and the
environment.
Secondary Messages
• OCSD is in full compliance with water quality standards of the Clean Water
Act.
• OCSD believes that the section 301(h) provision allows for greater overall
environmental protection of the land, air and sea while protecting the balance
of the native population of fish, shellfish and wildlife and assures future
flexibility for the agency to implement the newest and most efficient treatment
systems.
• OCSD has an extensive and rigorous pretreatment program to meet
secondary water quality equivalency for the removal of toxics, and an
extensive wastewater and ocean monitoring program to protect the public
health and the environment.
• OCSD would consume much more energy - both electricity and natural gas
necessary to run the co-generation facilities. In 2020, with the Ground Water
Replenishment Program and operating at full secondary, we would be
required to manage approximately 25 percent more biosolids than currently
generated, and increase air emissions into the environment
Projected Biosolids Disposal
Year 2000 (GWRS not on-line vet)
Scenario 1 (Permit limits) 18,390 (tons/month)
Scenario 3 (Full Secondary) 24,940 (tons/month)
Approximately 36% increase
Year2020
Scenario 2 (Permit limits w/GWRS) 28,480 (tons/month)
Scenario 4 (Full Secondary w/GWRS) 35,120 (tons/month)
Approximately 23% increase
If you receive requests for more information on the treatment level issues or know of a
group who would benefit from hearing a presentation, please contact Lisa Lawson,
Communications Manager at 714/593-7120 or Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical
Services at 7141593-7400.
`O,NM1V 1.1Ny4 tiNN ,-
r itsen
to questions about...
N'e`(YC rME ENNM1�O
301 (h) Provision
of the Clean Water Act
• Background The Clean Water Act(CWA) is a 1972 amendment to the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act. The 1972 CWA requires publicly owned treatment
,., works(POTWs)to use secondary treatment prior to discharge to ocean waters.
In 1977, § 301(h)was added to the Clean Water Act. It allowed qualified POTWs
employing rigorous pretreatment and extensive ocean monitoring programs to
discharge into deep ocean waters that had large tides and substantial currents
allowing for greater dilution and dispersion than inland and estuarine waterbodies.
In order for a POTW to qualify for a discharge permit under §301(h)of the Clean
Water Act,the discharger must meet stringent criteria including:
. Compliance with water quality standards of the Clean Water Act
and the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act
. Protection and reproduction of a balanced native population of fish,
shellfish and wildlife
�) . Protection of beach and nearshore recreational activities
l - . Establishment of an extensive ocean monitoring program
� . A rigorous pretreatment program in order to meet secondary water
quality equivalency for the removal of taxies
• Protection of public water supplies
Since the adoption of the Clean Water Act,the Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) has consistently complied with this and all other federal, state and local
Orange County regulations.
Sanitation District
• Who issues OCSD's Ocean Discharge Permit? When was the
last permit issued? The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD)ocean
To maintain isvirld-claa; discharge permit is jointly issued by the federal Environmental Protection Agency
leadership in unutcul (EPA)and the State of California by the local Regional Water Quality Control Board
and ix,attir resource (RWQCB).The ocean discharge permit requires review by the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to assure that the
issuance of a permit will not impact endangered or threatened species. Also, the
California Coastal Commission performs a review of the permit for consistency
with the Coastal Act.
The permitting process requires a series of public hearings that assure an oppor-
tunity for all interested parties to comment on the draft permit. The 5-year permit
that OCSD is currently operating under was issued in June 1998 and expires in
June 2003.The renewal application must be submitted to the regulators by
December 2002.
10844 Ellis Avenue • How does OCSD treat wastewater? What is advanced
Fountain primary treatment? OCSD treats wastewater using three processes:
r t • preliminary treatment, advanced primary treatment,and secondary treatment.
for more information In preliminary treatment,wastewater passes through screens that remove large
and nonorganic materials. It then flows into grit chambers where the heaviest
or Visit our web site materials such as egg shells, coffee grounds, and sand settle out. The materials
removed here are then sent to a landfill.
OCSD/053301/3011H1.<dr pogei
After preliminary treatment, the wastewater is pumped to large settling basins.
Chemicals are added to reduce hydrogen sulfide, control odors,and combine
small particles into larger particles. Here liquids and solids are separated.
The heavier solids settle and are scraped off the bottom, and the lighter material
is skimmed off the top of the basins.The thickeners that are added to improve
settling of the heavier solids result in advanced primary treated wastewater. All of
OCSD's wastewater receives advanced primary treatment.Advanced primary
treatment removes 70 percent of the solids in the wastewater.
Secondary treatment is primarily a biological system that uses microorganisms
to feed on the organic material that is left in the water after primary treatment.
OCSD treats approximately half of its wastewater using secondary treatment.
Combined primary and secondary treatment remove 85 percent of the solids
in the wastewater.
OCSD uses two different processes for secondary treatment: trickling filters and
activated sludge. Trickling filters use revolving arms that spray wastewater over
baseball sized rocks covered in zoogleal slime(microorganisms)to clarify the
wastewater.Activated sludge is a brownish mixture containing a variety of aerobic
microorganisms. The activated sludge is mixed with the wastewater in large
tanks.Air or oxygen is bubbled through the mixture creating an ideal environment
for the bacteria to feed, grow and reproduce. The bacteria eat most of the
dissolved organic material in the wastewater.
• What is the difference between the standards required In a
full secondary treatment permit and a permit issued under
the § 310(h) section? The § 301(h) provision of the federal Clean Water
Act allows for a slight increase in the amount of total suspended solids(TSS)
and biological oxygen demand (BOD)over set standards imposed on other ocean
discharge permit holders. These slight increases are in the concentration, but
there is still a limit in the overall mass that can be discharged. However,the
§ 301(h)permit requires increased ocean monitoring by OCSD and increased
environmental examination by regulatory agencies.
• Where does the water go after treatment? After treatment, OCSD
discharges the treated effluent between four and five miles out to sea from an
ocean outfall pipe 200 feet underwater. The outfall runs perpendicular to the
beach heading out to sea lust north of the Santa Ana River in Huntington Beach.
• Does OCSD test to make sure fish and other sea life are not
affected by the outfall's treated effluent discharge? OCSD
conducts an annual multi-million dollar ocean-monitoring program.The extensive
monitoring program tracks and evaluates water quality,sediment quality and sea
life from Seal Beach to Corona Del Mar.
The program is designed to measure impacts to the coastal ocean environment
from the discharge of treated wastewater so that OCSD can take appropriate
measures to ensure the continued protection of human health and marine
organisms.
Thousands of samples are taken each year from the coastal waters and bottom
sediments using rig fishing, trawling, sediment grabs,water column testing and
in plant wastewater samples to ensure the safety and health of the public and
marine life. OCSD is required to perform more sampling than other agencies,
but annually the agency does considerably more that the minimum requirements
due to its interest in overall watershed and environmental protection.
ocsoro523e1n01(N).M, yaye 2
• Why does OCSD choose to be regulated under the § 301(h)
provision rather than implement full secondary treatment?
OCSD believes that the § 301(h) provision allows the agency to strike a balance
between the impacts upon the air, land and water environments due to the
wastewater treatment process. As a result, OCSD believes that the § 301(h)
. rt t'`i •.^" provision allows for greater overall environmental protection of the land, air and
2 sea and assures future flexibility for the agency to implement the newest and
most efficient treatment systems.
• What would happen if OCSD was required to change
wastewater treatment levels to full secondary? OCSD would
consume much more energy(electricity and natural gas necessary to run the
co-generation facilities), be required to manage approximately 25% percent
more biosolids than currently generated, and increase air emissions into the
environment.
The ratepayers in Orange County would pay an additional $200-400 million dollars
for construction of secondary facilities and approximately$10 million dollars more
�4'r>•-"- �. a year in operations and maintenance. The bulk of the amount is the cost of
handling and disposing of 6iosolids.
a _
• How is the § 301(h) provision linked to ocean water
closures? The § 301(h)provision is not related to the ocean water closures.
The closures are due to the presence of bacteria in the water,which is not
believed to be associated with OCSD's discharge. OCSD has repeatedly per-
formed wastewater analyses to demonstrate that the effluent plume is not
reaching nearshore waters; however, more analyses are planned to further assure
protection of public health. Full secondary treatment would not provide any
significant further protection of public health,as secondary treatment is NOT a
form of disinfection to rid the effluent of further bacteria.
• What differences might occur in the ocean environment
without the district's § 301(h) provision? We would not see any
difference in the ocean's sediment, however we might be able to detect a
decrease in the abundance of the fish around the discharge zone. There has been
an ecosystem established that uses some of the discharged nutrients for food.
By removing additional solids,we would be removing nutrients currently being
released to the ecosystem.
There is the potential to slightly increase the clarity in the water near the dis-
charge due to decreased solids. While the increase would be calculable, it is likely
not measurable.
• The 20-year Strategic Plan, dated 1999, shows that you are
preparing for full secondary treatment. When will that be
done? Why not sooner? The 1999 Strategic Plan process, which was a
public process, indicated that OCSD should pursue water reclamation and
- maintain the use of the § 301(h) provision of the Clean Water Act. OCSD believes
�'= that § 301(h) permit allows for a beneficial balance overall between the land, air
-
and ocean environments.
OCSD is not progressing towards full secondary at this time. If the decision were
made today to proceed to full secondary, it would take 5-10 years for OCSD to
begin operation.
OCSD/052301/301(H).Wr pep.3
r
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTIO
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, May 17, 2001, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 17, 2001, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager
Steve Anderson, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations&
Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Maintenance
Brian Brady Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Guy Carrozzo John Linder, Construction Manager
Brian Donahue Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager
Alice Jempsa Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor
Beth Krom Tod Haynes, Construction Supervisor
Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
Directors Absent: Mike Bock, Project Manager
Tod Ridgeway Gail Cain, Acting Committee Secretary
OTHERS PRESENT:
Bob Getter, CGvL Engineers
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5!
Y.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 2
May 17, 2001
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the April 5, 2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair, Steve Anderson, welcomed Director Brian Brady who has replaced Peer Swan as
a Committee member.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported on treatment levels and ocean issues. Mr.
Anderson reported that the first round of the intensive ocean monitoring studies will begin on
May 22. The studies will generate about one million data points that will hopefully provide an
answer to the hypothesis that the District's discharge may impact the beach.
Mr. Anderson reported that staff is continuing to study methods for improving our level of
treatment, and that a fast-track microfiltration research project will be brought directly to the
Board in June 2001. He also reported that he will be traveling to Washington, D.C. to attend the
Annual Conference of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies to work on issues
related to biosolids management and air quality. Mr. Anderson will also visit Dana Rohrbacher
regarding funding support for the ocean monitoring work that is underway, and Ken Calvert from
Riverside County regarding issues related to the Santa Ana River Interceptor funding.
(7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, asked that the issues scheduled to be addressed in this
section regarding SARI Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241, be discussed under Item (13),
Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Status Report.
(8) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, reported on public outreach regarding the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Line. A Citizen Advisory Committee meeting was held on May 8 with a small group of
residents and business owners from the neighborhood. Ms. Lawson reported that there were some
very good questions asked about the need of the project, the urgency behind it, and what would
happen today if the line broke in the river.
Ms. Lawson also reported on media briefings and coverage by The Orange County Register,the
Times, KFWB, NPR, and Channel 2. Coverage is expected to continue and we will provide briefings
to the media throughout the summer surveys.
Ms. Lawson advised that The Orange County Register has been at the District reviewing the
Cooperative Projects files for an upcoming story on city sewer lines. She also indicated that the
Directors could expect to be contacted by the Los Angeles Times regarding our Ocean Discharge
Permit and upcoming renewal.
V
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
May 17, 2001
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item. John Linder, Construction Manager, reviewed the Monthly Change Order
Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%.
(11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the PSA and Addenda Report.
(12) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity
Report.
(13) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS
REPORT
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, reported on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and
Protection Status Report. He reported that staff is preparing to restudy some of the alternatives that
we looked at earlier, and study other alternatives that hadn't been considered. The scope of this
study is being reviewed by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA), Orange County
Flood Control District, the Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, the City
of Yorba Linda, and the Citizen's Advisory Committee. Mr. Stewart also reported that on June 14,
2001, a workshop will be held with all of the major participants that we have been working with on
the SARI Project. The workshop location will be in the City of Yorba Linda at one of the local
elementary schools. The purpose is to update all of the stakeholders on the status of the project.
Mr. Stewart also reported on fieldwork conducted this week to visually inspect the conditions of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor within the river. A plan is being developed that will be brought before
the Board for any interim protection measures that are needed.
(14) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT
Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, reported on the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)
Status Report. The Committee agreed to change the GWRS Status Report from monthly to
quarterly, and as needed to report on significant issues as they arise. Mr. Herberg pointed out that
the Joint Cooperative Committee does report to the Board on a monthly basis on all the
expenditures.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 4
May 17, 2001 -
(15) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-i)
a. PDC01-26 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a Sole Source
Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for
development of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2
for a total amount not to exceed $308,000.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
b. PDC01-27 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services
Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo & Moore, and Converse
Consultants, to provide for materials testing, inspection, and
geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification
No. PSA-2001-3313D, for an amount not to exceed$80,000 for each
consultant for July 200112002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew
for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed
$130,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and
for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for each agreement for July
2003/2004 ($300,000 total).
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
C. PDC01-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional
Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting,
and Bush &Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for an amount not to
exceed $120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000
total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods
for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement for July
2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed
$95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000 total).
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
d. PDC01-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional
Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro
Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for an amount not to
exceed $70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000
total), with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods
for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for each agreement for July
2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed
$175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($350,000 total).
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
v
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
May 17, 2001
e. PDCOI-30 Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Miller-
Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, to provide
additional construction support services in the amount of$3,710, for
a total contract amount not to exceed$399,554.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve the
recommended action conditional upon the Director of Engineering
being provided an itemized breakdown of the costs of$3,710.
f. PDCOI-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order
No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach
1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing
an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total
contract amount to$8,810,056.56; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9
for an adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of
$90,780, increasing the total contract amount to$8,900,836.56; and
(3)Accept Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of
the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
g. PDC01-32 Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L,
M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-39, with Margate
Construction, authorizing an addition of$54,073 increasing the total
contract amount to$10,603,705.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carded to approve the
recommended action.
h. PDC01-33 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order
No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of
$2,692 and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the
total contract amount to$943,308,
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
1. PDC01-34 Recommend to the Board of Directors to establish a budget of
$144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection
Project, Contract No. 11-14R.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded,and duly carried to recommend
approval to the Board of Directors.
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 6
May 17, 2001
(16) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (a)
a. PDC01-35 Proposed FY2001/02 Capital Budgets. Information only item.
The proposed Capital Budget for FY2001/02 was reviewed with the
Committee, with a focus on new and revised projects.
MOTION: It was moved,seconded, and duly carried to receive and
file the information only report.
(17) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
(19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(20) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(21) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
June 7, 2001, at 5 p.m.
(22) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
"� C�
ail Cain
Acting PDC Committee Secretary
G:Mq.0l WndaNIX130J1V.fnW WS1701 PM MMW .d
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: ,���7.3/a/ TIME: 7 d /�
(SIMONIAN) .....................ANDERSON................... ✓ — _
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... -
(LARSON) ........................ BOYD............................
_� r —
(MILLER) .......................... BRADY ........................ _
(CRANDALL) ...................CARROZ20................. ✓ —
(ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... SL_ —
(UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. r y —
(SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN...................
���c —
(GAROFALO) ................... GREEN.........................
�� —
(DUVALL) ......................... GULLIXSON................... ✓j —
(DEBOLT).........................JEMPSA...................... 1i ✓ —
(WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... �C —
(SMITH)............................ KROM........................ �c ✓ —
(BROADWATER).............. LEYES..........................
mac —
(DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN...............�c ✓ —
(CHRISTY)........................ MC GUIGAN..................�� ✓ _
(SIMONOFF) .................... MOORE........................ _� ✓ —
(COONTZ)........................ MURPHY...................... a— e, —
(EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. J� ✓ _
(FRESCHI)........................PATTERSON................. —
(KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ —
(ADAMS) .......................... RIDGEWAY................... .... �G — —
(DOW)...............................SIGLER.........................
�/ ✓— —
(SMITH. CHUCK) .............SILVA........................... —� —
(BLAKE)............................WALKER........................ G �G —
STAFF:
Anderson
Ghirelli ✓
Kyle ✓
Lawson ✓
Ludwin ✓
Miles ✓
Ooten ✓
Tomko ✓
Streed
OTHERS:
Woodruff
Andrus
Nixon
05/23/01
G:%wp.dlaladmin\BS\DIRECTOR4)lmctom Roll Call.dm
1 / , REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. yR�� � � n
DATE: 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. /Y"^""�' Cvw�
« . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NAME: (please print) LA124--y P09TIX
HOME ADDRESS: t o I WaTcj-APF DQ 4001
(number/street)
I fE,4N c �y 9Zdbv
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: '* T,+R• -" Le,L•�I(p�p
REPRESENTING: OGLAA�' Ot.�w
(self/name of organi ation)
1// • REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: J a3 - D 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. I G_.
NAME: (please print) (20 S eiv�
HOME ADDRESS: to O y'"4'rV'6 t-�
(number/street) �p
?r2a�- YJeu c_P.. I 07 O
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: 'I I-� - G.35 KS-
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of o nization)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
I ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) cU0 UJ,I�,,,'K, c)y : 'f ij
HOME ADDRESS: Ld Zd Pa
(number/street)
sew " 90 7y 0
(city/zip code) �
TELEPHONE: 7I -4 T�y /D ^ �J /`-' 7
REPRESENTING: d-('�d
(self/name of o anization)
\\lead\datal\wp.dtaWdmin\ S\FORMSVRequest to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
FAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
VIIIAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: S —�.� ` till AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) l-� J� II N ALP, fl I
HOME ADDRESS: 1 ? 3 � l F> RL UA I Al
(number/street)
NR M gy
(city/zip code) p
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) p� ( t% '9 Pam'— -a U , �
HOME ADDRESS: m �
(number/street)
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: y� ,i¢.
(self/naa a of organization)
\\lead\dalet\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORM"equest to Speak,doe
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
i
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: s Z-� J�� AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) �M/� y��T7 -f4&nF-
HOME ADDRESS:
(number/street)
Aje-w
(city/zip c[�od/e)
�/
TELEPHONE: 9 - �q� �`, �5�
REPRESENTING: I/l1)-c
(self/name of organization)
\\lead\datai\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Requeet to Speak.doc
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: /2 ( AGENDA ITEM NO. ? S
NAME: (please print) t ) oal Xe 4ee HOME ADDRESS: Z20?01' 'r3lerac.K.. jo
(number/street)
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE: `198 37Y4?AD4,y'n
REPRESENTING: '!:�? 4,
(self/name of organization)
\llead\datai\wp.dtatadmin\BSIFORMS\Request to Speak.doo
/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF
GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN,
SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS
MAYBE LIMITED TO FIV MINUTES.
�"' n ff,,
DATE: J V AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (please print) AA
HOME ADDRESS: ,. 4
(number/street)
(city/zip code)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(self/name of organization)
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
ceaw, 0 V f
S
eGee O G
7
U
/3
--PAuL 1 WAS GIT/2 Fesr Md"rt-c, eu. Ac rg
H1WR.OTMDMWWWORM SIGN-IN FORMAOC
0 �6ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
May 23, 2001
"hone` To the Chair and Members
17141962-2411
of the Board of Directors
..111,add.:
Po Bo,8127 Subject: Board Letter
Founcein Valley.CA
92728-8127
.44 M n Aa na: The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information
iOB44 ells/avenue y y g'
Fountain Veneyr ca on any of the items, please call me.
9210E-701 B
Level of Treatment: The Big Ticket Item (On Several Fronts)
Member
Acteche r As you know, the issue of our ocean discharge has been the subject of numerous press
Moo
0 reports and comments by members of the public at our board meetings. Increased
Cities interest in this issue has been raised by the reports of elevated concentrations of
bacteria along a stretch of beach north of the Santa Ana River. The events occur in the
8.
.
vicinity of Newland and Magnolia Streets and occur occasionally--mostly in the summer
raa
eaena Perk and mostly during high tide events. There are three possible explanations. The first is
cypress input from the Banning Flood Control Channel and the Santa Ana River. Urban runoff
Fountain ✓alley
FullerWn and seabirds could be contributing elevated bacterial counts that are mobilized by the
Garden C cva inward and outward rush of seawater in these inland waterways, the influence of high
HuntingWn Reach
Irvin tidal action. The second is input from a source or sources that we have yet identified,
Le Habra despite two summers of extraordinary efforts on the part of the Sanitation District, the
1a Palme
L.Alamitaa city of Huntington Beach, and the County of Orange. The third is input from our own
Na porr Ranch outfall. According to a hypothesis first advanced by Dr. Stanley Grant of UCI, a unique
Orange combination of marine conditions causes the edge of our discharge wecenne plume to be
9 9
Santa M. occasionally pulled in toward shore during the summer months of the year.
seal Reach
Banton
r mn We are testing this hypothesis to determine whether our discharge plume is reaching
Vila Perk
r rba bnda shore by conducting an unprecedented marine monitoring effort this spring and summer.
County of orange A million data points will be generated during this time. The data will be collected,
compiled, analyzed and evaluated, with the help and independent review by a team of
scientists from throughout Southern California. We hope to reach conclusions about
s.nlc.ry olscrlota what the data mean by January of 2002. We intend to conduct the work in the full view
costs Msae of the public and the press. Access to the data will be made available in as timely a
MhMay c4r manner as possible. We are committed to allow the concerned public to look over our
Water Districts shoulder during the monitoring work and as the data are evaluated.
lmnc Ranch
We have no reason to believe that wildlife, fishes or the marine environment are being
adversely impacted by our discharge. More than 15 years of monitoring data convince
of this. Nevertheless, this issue will also be addressed, but in a different context. The
Sanitation District is obligated to apply for an ocean discharge permit every five years.
'To Protect the Public Haafth aW Me Environment through Excellence in Mosteweter Syareme-
Members of the Board
Page 2
May 23, 2001
Our permit renewal application must be submitted to EPA and the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board in December 2002. As a normal part of the application
process, we must submit extensive marine monitoring data to demonstrate whether or
not the quality of our discharge is adequately protective of the marine environment.
This work will take many months to complete and we will make certain that our efforts
are available to the scrutiny of any interested member of the public or the press.
Regarding the technology and costs related to changing our current method of
treatment, we expect to develop preliminary estimates between now and the summer
of 2002. Our research staff will conduct small-scale testing of promising treatment
technology, including microfiltration, for reducing the amount of pathogens in our
effluent. We will also refine our understanding of all of the implications of more
secondary treatment, including capital costs, operating costs, marine environment
improvements, air quality impacts, trucking costs, and energy requirements. We will
estimate the fair share costs that we will recover from all of our residential, commercial
and industrial users through the new user fees and capital fees that will eventually be
levied --depending upon what additional technology is determined to be needed.
We will develop a robust and comprehensive community outreach and communication
plan. We will make certain that the Board is fully aware of all public concerns and
comments as it makes its decision about our December 2002 application. We intend for
all relevant scientific, technological, financial, and community issues to be clearly
communicated to the Board as it considers the application and its significant public
policy implications.
All of this will be reported to the Board and its committees over the next year and a half
in workshops, committee meetings, and board meetings and written reports.
Urban Runoff
The District has approved the Orange County Flood Control District's (OCFCD) request
to discharge dry weather urban runoff into the District's sewer system during the period
of May 21, 2001 through September 14, 2001. As part of OCFCD's dry weather urban
runoff plan for Huntington Beach's coastal waters, temporary diversion systems were
installed in the Santa Ana River, Greenville-Banning, and Talbert channels during the
week of May 7, 2001. OCFCD anticipates that these diversion systems will be
operational by May 14, 2001; however, the discharge of dry weather urban runoff into
the District's sewer system will not occur until May 21, 2001.
Members of the Board
Page 3
May 23, 2001
Similar to last summer, the temporary diversion systems will consist of a concrete block
dam, submersible pump, and PVC pipelines. With a collective daily flow average of 1.4
million gallons a day, these diversion systems will be connected to either the City of
Huntington Beach's sewer line or directly into the District's sewer system. As part of the
District's dry weather urban runoff discharge requirements, OCFCD agrees to comply
with the terms and conditions set forth in the District's Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy,
Resolution OCSD 01-07. Although the District has not yet reached a final written
agreement with OCFCD or issued a discharge permit for the temporary diversion
project, OCFCD anticipates that an agreement should be finalized and approved by
OCFCD's governing board no later than July 24, 2001.
We will continue our policy of accepting up to four million gallons a day from all dry
weather urban runoff sources at no charge to them. If and when the total flow does
reach four million gallons per day, then we will charge all of them to recover our costs
of$321 per million gallons discharged.
Community Outreach
Children's Drinking Water Festival
The Children's Drinking Water Festival held May 1 and May 2 at Hidden Valley Park in
Irvine was a great success. During the two day festival, approximately 800 children
participated in our"Wastewater Survivor Rapid Relay Contest."All of the children were
given a button stating "I survived Wastewater Survivor" and a Clean Water Willie
reflective zipper pull. Nine employees volunteered to run the adventure and many others
helped in setting up and tearing down.
The Children's Drinking Water Festival is a two-day event hosted by the Blue Planet
Foundation. This year was the fifth year it has successfully taken place. More than 5,500
students attend the festival and participate in the various interactive activities.
Open House
The first OCSD public open house since 1983 drew a good crowd on May 5, 2001.
Approximately 325 people attended the event that was part of a regional effort to kick
off Water Awareness Month. Thirty-four of OCSD's finest volunteered their Saturday to
show their OCSD pride and open our house to the community. Booths included: the
biosolids bam, the urban runoff central station train, source control, emergency services,
Huntington Beach summer studies, human resources, OCSD vector truck and mini-
Members of the Board
Page 4
May 23, 2001
crane, the cyber cafL'which included the OCSD computer internet display, wastewater
jeopardy and karaoke. Our own experts gave tours.
Ocean Outfall Group
The Ocean Outfall Group, consisting of individuals from local coastal cities, held its last
originally scheduled session on May 9, 2001. The group requested additional sessions
with the biosolids group, a tour of the water district and on future engineering projects.
Those meetings have not been scheduled yet.
The Ocean Outfall Group was invited in for several education sessions beginning in
January. They have learned about source control, biosolids management, maintenance
and operations and our ocean-monitoring program. They have also toured Plant 1 and
Plant 2.
Newport Back Be
On Earth Day, OCSD hosted an informational booth at the Newport Back Bay Earth Day
celebration. General information and literature specific to the Back Bay Trunkline Sewer
Repair and Rehabilitation Project was distributed. Three members of the
communications team and project manager Mark Tomko manned the booth.
Approximately 1,000 people attended the festival held at Shellmaker Island.
Project-related Outreach
Back Bay Trunkline
On May 3, Mark Tomko provided a presentation on the Back Bay Trunkline Sewer
Repair and Rehabilitation Project to the Upper Newport Bay Naturalists. Approximately
40 members heard an hour-long presentation regarding the project, examined the cured
in place pipe materials and diagrams. The group was supportive of our efforts and
offered any assistance that they could provide.
Santa Ana River Interceptor Line
The first citizens advisory committee for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line relocation
or protection project was held on May 8. The citizens advisory committee consists of
residents and business owners in the neighborhoods directly and indirectly affected by
the project.
Members of the Board
Page 5
May 23, 2001
Dave Ludwin, Blake Anderson and Lisa Lawson provided a general overview of the
Santa Ana River Interceptor line, its purpose and role for Orange County residents and
businesses. A project status was shared and general discussion about neighborhood
issues and how to best communicate with the members and the entire community.
The next meeting will be held in a couple of months when there is more progress on the
alternative review.
A Fair Opportunity for Board Members to Participate
Come join us at this years Orange County Fair July 13 - 29. It is the perfect opportunity
to talk to interested Orange County residents about important OCSD issues. The Fair
is open Thursday through Sunday from 10 a.m. until 11 p.m. and Monday through
Wednesday 12 p.m. until 11 p.m. We are looking for volunteers to help staff our booth.
If you are interested, please contact Lisa Lawson at(714)593-7120. Sign up early to get
the best shifts. If you'd like to drop by and visit, we'll be in a comer booth in the Orange
County Building.
You Look Marvelous[
We are currently in the process of creating new and revising existing literature that will
work together to create an overall consistent identity of OCSD. A general brochure for
the District is in its fourth draft and will be completed within a few weeks. An ocean
discharge permit fact sheet, Back Bay Trunkline fact sheet, Urban Runoff Diversion fact
sheet and several biosolids fact sheets have been developed. A new informational
pocket folder and presentation template will be produced shortly.
Orange County Community Indicators
The second annual Community Indicators Report was released and provided to
attendees at the State of the County conference on May 8 in Anaheim. The report
measures the overall wellbeing of the Orange county community. It uses a range of
indicators to track broad, countywide economic, social and environmental trends.
Identified in the report is coastal water quality. It contains a one-page summary
explaining the number of beach mile days lost due to ocean water closures for 1999,
and causes for closures from 1995 — 1999. The source of information is the Orange
Members of the Board
Page 6
May 23, 2001
County Health Care Agency.
The report states that in 1999 there were 156 beach mile days lost due to ocean water
closures. The primary cause for closures was sewage pipeline blockages in 1999 and
pipeline breaks in 1998. There were 276 unauthorized waste discharges in 1999, up
from 76 in 1990. The reason for the pipeline failures is debated, but possible causes
include aging sewer infrastructure, need for increased pipeline maintenance,
uncharacteristically wet weather or a combination of all.
The report states that poor water quality leading to postings is largely attributed to urban
runoff, and recognizes that local agencies are taking steps during dry weather periods
to divert urban runoff flows into the sewer system.
A graph shows the number of ocean water closures from 1995-1999 and causes
including pipeline breaks, pipeline blockages, pump station failures, treatment plant
discharges, collection system storm water surcharges, and urban runoff. Of these
causes, treatment plant discharge is the smallest number of occurrences contributing
to ocean water closure — only one event in five years according to the Health Care
Agency's data.
Media Coverage
• In the last month, OCSD has received media coverage from KCBS Channel 2,
KOCE, OCN, KFWB radio, Times Orange County edition, and the OC Register. The
issues covered centered around the beach and ocean studies in Huntington Beach
— prompted by our press conference, and the County of Orange's urban runoff
diversions, which divert flows to the OCSD Huntington Beach Plant.
• Board members can expect to receive a call from the Times Orange County Edition
inquiring about our ocean discharge permit and board member opinion of the permit.
The Times has asked various members about their support of the renewal
application in 1989. Board members are welcome to call Lisa Lawson to talk about
some of the message points already shared with the reporter on this issue. She can
be reached at (714) 593-7120.
• The Orange County Register reporters have been spending time at OCSD reviewing
applications for our cooperative projects. As you will recall, the cooperative projects
is a program where OCSD provides matching grants to member agencies who
submit projects that will help reduce inflow and infiltration water into our facilities.
Members of the Board
Page 7
May 23, 2001
The Register is researching local sewer systems, maintenance schedules, operation
costs, etc. We can expect to see a series of articles in the near future.
OC Grand Jury Report on Restaurant Grease
OCSD staff is working with the County of Orange and other entities on a coordinated
response to the findings and recommendations identified in the OC Grand Jury report
on grease. Their report was released in April. We have proposed that the County, the
Sanitation District and the many local sewering agencies here in Orange County craft
a joint response to the Grand Jury or at least coordinate our responses.
As you will recall, the Grand Jury is recommending that uniform grease ordinances be
adopted and enforced countywide, that grease management training be required of
restaurant workers and that grease trap inspections be incorporated into the county's
existing restaurant inspection program. These are all very complex issues and various
agencies may have differing points of view on them.
OC Grand Jury Report on Urban Runoff
The Grand Jury intends to release a report on urban runoff in June. They will be
conducting an "exit interview"with sanitation district staff and several other agencies
prior to the release of the final report to give us a last chance to comment on its
accuracy. I anticipate that I can provide an outline of the findings at the June Board
Meeting.
Odor Complaints
Attached is a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center.
Published Articles of Interest
I have included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I
would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so
many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you.
o g,
Members of the Board
Page 8
May 23, 2001
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
A&,
Blake P. Anderson
General Manager
BPA:pjm
G I"DTAU MIMGMLLETIERS TO THE 50 =1OR3D1.WL
Attachments
Date: February S,2001
Orange County Sanitation District
Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2001
puNr No.1 pp pp
Jan Feb Mar t A r Mai Jun Jul Au SOP Oct Nov Dec
1I1T Y.. N Ino Y22 es
aum
reiawe
Total: H. 0 M M M M M M 10
PLANT N0.2 yy y yy
Jan Feb Mar Apr >rli Me Jun Jul Ada SOP Oct ; Nov 1 Dec rd
2l4 no 3I29 yes 4/2 yB8 511 e
413 a Sl9 s
9/15
Z4 no
wm.
rel.na
Total: 0 1 3 2
Colleegon Svslems PP 11 1
Jan I I Feb Mar Apr 4 Me Jun Jul AUGt Sao Oct ! Nov & Dec
1Po ro L1 rw 311e no
trn ro --
-K rl9 3119 10
t20 m Mile. Iw
2RT no'
2I2T no'
2Ry no'
z7no'
2RB no
oaaea
wtea
con.:Total a Takl 0 Tobl 0 To Total Total Total Trial Total Total Total TONI
RJO:YSH'011 This spreadsheet does not Include In-house odor complairds
g:lexccl.dlatom\Odor Complaint Log.xls
W(VI k Place
CAREERS , MANAGEMENT, SUCCESS
Rethinking Employee Evaluations
Most firms use them but are based labor attorney and organizational Coens and Jenkins say yes. "Appraisals
trainer Tom Coens and consultant Mary try to serve several different functions,
unhappy with the process. Jenkins, co-authors of "Abolishing Per- which is part of the problem;' Jenkins
Some observers say the concept forma tce Appraisals: Why They Backfire said. "We would suggest'debundling' the
Deeds to be updated. and Wharto Do Instead"(Betrett-Koehler, fuPctions�rganizational Improvement,
p 2000). feedback, coaching, development, com-
Coens and Jenkins believe performance pensation decision-making and legal
By SUSANVAUGHN reviews are a remnant of an earlier era documentation—and assigning individual
SPECIAL To ME TIMES and may not be appropriate for today's systems to handle each."
performance reviews can be agony for workplace. Harried managers might grouse about
managers and subordinates alike. "For so long, we've been redesigning the preparatory work needed to do this,
Managers dread them, fearing chat- appraisals because of their dismal track Coens and Jenkins concede. But in the
forges and damaged work reladonships— records,and to little avail;'Jenkins said long run,they say,the managers and their
never mind the lost hours filling out The process remains an imperfect organizations might benefit.
forms. subordinates worry that less-than- means of measuring and rewarding em- Motivation to change, the fuel that
stellar ratings will mean a puny raise or ployee behavior, despite hundreds of sparks Improved performance,must come
placement on an upcoming layoff list. books, articles, instructional videos and from within employees.And performance
Although eight out of 10 American symposiums on the procedure and ways appraisals aren't crafted to address that.
workplaces use the review process, about to reinvent,reform and revitalize it.But is Their paternalistic nature is partly to
90%are dissatisfied with it,said Michigan- there a better way? Please see Reviews,W3
Cos Angeles dimes
y SUNDAY
..rf:.. APRIL8,2001
/ W W W.IATIMES.COMIWORKPIACE
Gt
ALGOL0IS / Porinanmas
Mary Jenkins and Tom Coens, co-authors of "Abolishing Performance Appraisals:
Why They Backfire and What to Do Instead;'believe performance reviews are a rem-
nant of an earlier era and may not be appropriate for today's workplace.
LOS ANGELES TIMES SUNDAY,APRIL 8,2001 W3 B
Reviews: Give Review survival Guide
Workers More As difficult as R Is io deliver bad news,it is no easier to receive
it.In highly charged emotional situations,especially when we
Involvement feel judged or criticized,our listening skills break down.Our
heart races.Our breath quickens.Here are some tips to help
Continued from wi you accept evaluations with dignity:
blame. 1.Before a performance review,compile examples of work
During reviews, supervisors in done well and compliments received from colleagues.Include
parental roles critique behaviors of documentation of personal and professional attributes,
employees in duldren's roles and personality strengths and communication skills.
mandate specific actions to be
changed. Rewards and punish- 2.Create a list of things to improve.Prioritize yourweaknesres
menu are meted out accordingly. and select three to work on immediately.
Supervisors, rather than em- 3.During the review,tell yourself,'I need to listen to this.It will
ployees, control the scheduling of help me grow personally and professionally.'
the sessions. However, feedback 4.Stay present and tuned in to what you are hearing.
would be better utilized if it were
Initiated bywurkers,Coens sad S.Be as objective and unemotional as possible.
"The fact is, people are pretty S.Do not mtemupL
eager to learn how they can be 7.Summarize and restate what you hear to ensure you heard it
more effective in their work"said correctly.
Lynn Summers, vice president of B.Ask yourself,*Is the feedback specific and actio"danted?'
research at Performaworks in Ra-
leigh, N.C. Summers advocates specifics so you can understand the critique.
employee performance manage- 9.Create an action plan for attaining your goals.
ment,in which the supervisor pro- 10.follow up to assess your progress.
vides coaching and feedback If you prepare yourself by reviewing your strongest qualities and
throughout the year. view the negative characteristics as vehicles for self-
improvement,you might even begin to welcome critical
Tougher Than Eycl feedback from others.
- Coteau and Jet khhs acknowledge pseryloam
axrsni�axnAswdales.secxaarbawa cuwmmkanore
that the performance review proc-
ess isn't about to disappear from
the corporate landscape any time
soon.And for those who must give Others,hoping to,avoid conflict of New York Buffalo. He cited w
reviews,challenges are mounting. and shattered relationships, give examples technological break-
Boom have less time to observe their employees overly positive re- downs and quality control prob-
staff.A growing number are being views or allow employees to bully lems
asked to supervise from afar, them into raising ratings.Or they'll At their hest, performance re-
sometimes mfles or states away commit another offense: They'll views should be collaborative
from their employees. decrease ratings to comply with events, said Arky Ciancutd, faun.
"I ask people,'Haw many of you budget restraints. der of the leamfng Center, a San
can remember when your.boss It happens more often than Anselmo, Calif.-based research
spent uninterrupted time for an anyone would he wilting to ad- center,and co-author of"Bunt on
hour reviewing what you do?'" out"Coleman said. Trust:Gaining Competitive Advent.
said Joseph Weintraub, professor Many of these scenarios can [age in Any.Organization" (Con-
of management at Babson College give rise to
Ha problems later on, temporary Books,2tl(10).
in Wellesley,Mass."And this is the an,chairman of -Employees should be able to
person who's determining how employment practice group at De- participate, in setting objectives
much money you'll be getting" chert law rum in Philadelphia. - - and express their needs for feed.
Many bosses in today's work. back and coaching said Bob Rog.
place don't understand thew sub. Are They Even Fait? to, president of Development Di.
ordinates'jobs, so are not.able ro mensions International in
appropriately coach them or sug- As workers depend mom heavily Pittsburgh
Best concrete ways in which they ontofleagues to get jobs done,the They also should be encour-
can improve.Coens said. task of reviewing individual per- aged, without few of reprisal, to
Some, overworked and short of formance is becoming murkier, report any employer-generated
time, haphazardly fill out reviews Coem said Can team members be goals that they believe are mused.
or commit the "recency error": fairly appraised when their out. utic, unmanageable or humtrat.
They focus heavily on employees' comes are dependent on the ran. ingly vague.
latest weak and all but ignore their tributions of their peers? It may be cold comfort but ram-
past months'contributions. It's unlikely,experts say. - plaints about performance reviews
"The tone of the review ends up "There are so many things in smoothing new.In the 4th century
being based on the last project the the system that have a huge im- Wei Dynasty,for example, a disap-
person worked on before the boss pact on your performance, yet pointed Chinese writer lamented:
filled out this review," said Bill your ability to control them is '"The imperial rater of nine Bud"
Coleman, vice president of com- minimal," said Jerry Newman, seldom rates men according to thew
pensation for Salary.com in professor of organization and hu. merits but always according to his
Welle_slev.M.U. man res ,.r car Crarn rhniwrsiry 11ac ono A�.hnx"
/ Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section I Page # Sate � bjgctIP
Orange County Register
S, tists to probe sea
qu i t'
Environment & A new, $41 million study The six-mgnth project said George Robertson, a se-
will Elkus On bacteria off HilI1t1I1gtOA Beach. 'could force the Orange nior scientist at The sanitation
County sanitation District to district. "Our Primary goal is
change the way it puiilps- to jtnderstand transport of
By OLIVIA HAWKINSON along guntit)gton State waste water out to sea if sci- our(Waste-water)plume."
The Orarge cwnty R"lster Beach artists find that the practice The . sanitation district,
This latest ,probe is the *datens swimmers' health,! which is leading the study of.
MYNTIMOTON BEA. third 5incc high. paa(eria tOnc optbn.intend' gsew- the outfall pipe area.will start
Scientists this gtQn@(;'v�ill counts closed miles of corut- cage treatment,could ost the- the probe'May.2L
launch a $41 million study lineto swimming in&99,and district - and .ratepayers - The district Will deploy a
aimed at " daterrI fling it will dwarf"past studies in millions of dollars. " team of about 150 people six
whether treated Sewage terms Of manpower, money �-It's going to be a real im-! times during the summer,to
pumped to the ocean i u- spent ind data collected,offs- pertain step for us in under- smdy35squazemilesofocean
ences high bacteria levels cWs said Tuesday. standing wbat's going am- off Huntington state and city
beaches - a ,rectangular area
roughly bounlKd by Goltien-
west Street,t1eM7ewporf P!qr,
the shoreline and about'siz
stiles out to sea
Six boats and submersible
water-sampling equipment
will be used to collect htiw
dreds of water samples, then
Send the water to labs to test
for bacteria,salinity and other
components.
Counry and city officials
OCEAN -PAGES
orange County Sanitationtation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Su ject� w
Orange County Register ae 5 s�9�o/
OCEAN: mystery erybIge
larys bacteria ,
"May?I.Orange County
Sani(alion Dislfid Scientists will f
Scientists ranch a54.1mlllion sxmontn
study to try todelermine- ;'xumhgtal�';
to study whether treated sewage Mach Pier
Dumped treated ocean
could influence the high pow er plant Intake Glue
oagteda levels found m�
along Huntington
bacteria Hate Beach. panne a
Ocean
problem ` over.. ..
Thestutlyarea will cover sanitation _
PROM PAGE 1 about 35 square miles alpellne
have already spent more than
$4 million investigating the "
mysmrious bacteria plaguing i011ui0""s't°u"gse"naten bided i The Register
Huntington Beach waters.
The sanitation district will �We aic All Orange County resi-
pay $2.6 million to $2.9 mil- Far ndanRdm abet ew study,pee dents win have to ful the bill
Bon out of its capital improve- ewhv-csdrar' for cleaner water,said Shawn
ment'budget for this suin- Boyd,aSealBeach�ity Costs,
-
mei s study. beach.The outfall pumps 240 cil member and sanitation
"Ratepayers will not see an million gallops of wastewater district board member. Boyd
increase this year," Lawson four miles dffahore each day. said he ailvocates placing a
said. "It's something they've If it's proven the power bond measure on a `.future
already paid for." plant is sucking waste water countywide ballot to fund
The county, National Wa- back to shore, the sanitation more sewage and urban tun4
ter Research Institute and the district faces a tough choice: off treatment.
AES power plant will also spend SI70 million to build a "If ocean water quality is a
contribute money for the new pipe, spend $20 million major concern to people,then":
study. more per year to disinfect_we ought to be willing to antein
Scientists theorize that the waste water pumped through up and pay the price for it1"I
AES power plant's cooling the current pipe, or boost all Boyd said.
system may suck bacteria sewage ,treatment, which
from the sanitation district's could cost more than -Contact Hawilmm at 014)44560 a.�
outfall pipe back to the state S300 million. ohawkirmn@WegMercom
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject. � „
Los Angeles Times T
Sewage Fears May
Close Beach Again
BySF,EMA MEHTA to spend millions to further redticg
TIMES' AFF WNITEP bactzpa levels in the-,ef0uent<f{
Orange
ran a Cou [ s ublic health pipes gffshare.
R S y' P Public Health Officer Mark Hory
office,it Tuesday he is considery tonsaid he soon may make a"semi-
ingdosfrlg a stretch o(Hyntington permanent"decision to close the
Beach's Shorelme this summer be- beach or possibly post health wam
cause treated sewage released four (ng signs alerting swdmmers. Am
mlles,ofhhore may be drifting back other option would bolo continue
toward the beach. making decisions based on regular
In a separate move, the Orange water-quality samples. ..'
County Sanitation District on Tues- Through ch of last summer,
day announced a $9.1-million Prot closures conmu a
tinued to plague
act to netermina whetper the stretch of beach a quarter to a half
treated sewage from its outfml was mile an either side of Magnolia AN,,
the cause of the devastating do- can,
sures of much ofHuntington "It.boils down to what dowe feel
Beach's shoreline in the summer of we need to do to madmize protec-
1999. thin of public health,"Horton said.
If there is a connection between "We're considetir)g theoptlons."
the outfall plume and pollution at Horton said°the amount of
the.shoreline, the waste water money allocated fOT,the study re-
treatment agency could be forced Pleasesee BEACH,Bit
''P51)I``jUt10I1 ,y , KEY ....
Tf1eo17C5 'wNer muff' a
�'M,aHanq
A$4.1-million watecqualiry � _�G:k^L!. ;ps
AES
study off Hunflng[oh Beach outen. ;
will try to determine the
cause of high dosed
the . -qk.• `�•(yaµ,
levels that posed the shoreline ua E
in summer 1999,Scientists
theorize that high tides aqd/or ap. No,
underwater Waves cause ' 'kae
sewage ham a sanitation plant Serage 5�u,eoanae eaww
outfall to flow ashore. oun.n 's,�clro•a:mn
HIGH TIDE THEORY UNDERWATER WAVE THEORY
(Occurs nearshore) (Ortvrs offshore)
i
Sewage below thermocline dSH;with Underwater waves llhsewage from
fide.Hot water from outhall cames ocean floor.Sudace waves carry
sewage to surface. sewage ashore.
/Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper I section Page# Date
� R 3 Sltt
Los Angeles Times
BEACH: Closures Loom Again
, i
Costinved from Bl - was closedml3�uufmgtonBeach a! surhas ariim4iUt],m�4lp de ter retepayers,will not Bee a tat id-
fleets how seriously officfals are ter a water sa i'�f'remrded ex mmewhethar Uja 4ewage+plumefa erease:bfDcials omit.
taking the possibility;that e�.ueat _tjlame pigh� a rla reatlmgs presortOlin
silacaWl6"
G ndgretuigbackto;shore. auspected�the b.a ,Stdlmen ''� Using turiv Ad(kd
Past closures have affected ody a ry��aay.humaa sewage net likag'e' sled for d'
portions of the citys shoreline but reaching the beach. obmmon cfi laundr9
the stakes still are enosnous.Hun- ,§yrlate August,more than tom detergent -' 'IAaa Lawson spokesvoman for
tington Beach's 8.5 miles of beach 6IWof ocean from'Goldenwest' Devices will measure currents thc'sanitation dhMdcV,said that if
attract an average of 10 million Street to the Santa Ana River water temperature and meteoro-o- the'atudy detesmtn4s:tfie sewage
visitors a year But tha"pereretent.-m th wa& aced oft 2-
ftent oudttios "awustie plume9s'responsdge forthe water
closures m fl999 keptlejtodda away, Cause of tfiR canicontasry'nation the g'g@�f� would
hurting thgmty omYand tar Una ta7q• °r the 35 �hfJef4change operdfil"miss
niehitig its`eput�tt'as Surf City. a{er after balcmg sewer tapes �ytud, area ant le'adluUonsih"Elu�e dism-
City fit at acted rauttousy wer¢rivled outiae the cause" al � rey� fpCH'ng 'isewaan
iolet
to the ro k b" h closures � m i speed and duet
P sp Oaf _gxi<iee add':rPaeamE"a syevui" PIR0a light Nfiiehwoihon„
orderbyth,nest t.`.,. .patted urban rnndff notbTof >Tire UM fi aft t' ants Ana orb a t1 reat-'"fheY +teed tip, Slq�, g law, .Talbert Ma4eh andYhaSap er re o8rpay cos mettl a fywhist as
and they nreed,Sfi do ttthleiggt;( .gtaer IaeCisufomer when'; �, t,a - to ltac`kh4w mu- u $ �" ""'; n
Huntmgtor�Beffch city spok'esrmars.. IeM1misewere�high,.the 6eadhag4jei4 du evs after"¢nterin6 the ;� S re�ta ale led Deft
RichtoBatellatdthsaid;, in suin ynot p"�mq hat the o p j Yeaz asimilar study aPnftg matswiU
one I be tainted. v receive a ot( pthis am0-
job• tinned fhb Oman o'ft$imtington roar,H t6 Care AgR py.ppoks$-:
He addbd li*mr Y t:'H Ijeachatrq fuchna womatt f4mca urc eaitl site
they're ta"(pke- thoss �Sl g, mom" Una is haying "t Cry,topny -4 Wafs-d
drastic actions T�lieY.need to he::Th�rY s o $2 S,'c�,,on of the lyet bus a s..,tY1at ma
based on some data—either smen- In November,UC Irvine t ?'R, S h -,KalW at& agep4y;t�nds to prefer the aide of
tBic data or testing data tietStanleyGppt offereda w# ceutmn: �l
{Lorton safdthat h?11 probably the Orange Cdimty`Sanitg� . and th4 Coypty health vt'.jots .were
make a dect��wpn"tiefore the swim Wets treated YreAage ' 69`of out alUomta prAssed py envirro ate {or
season gets fNo(pr`along"but that -tom milts off is ' £Ed albs,_ h e , msiatim pressure Gum lonal pohti-
anytlecisoncotgtlolgebaeatlon .back to thesmP 4p`tpry hdseZipWer Plants cianato reopen the beach m late
the results of in eflidtee '"'tion oftid�-im e d e'ooledby ima, a Hmt is than summmlg99. ....
Under state]WIlhealth officials a local power play fosean.feit pumped ba erocean has "Based minor experience inHIN
Call-
must close beaches if they know coolingsyatero-f. t t£ N RW. pit 'W0:The Call and also then, 1 have complete
sewage is present..B bacteria levels The sedtaypa y�nt 'tf f may r4^ faithin the county health.ofDcmi'N
are FUgh becauseof runoff,Dachas are will test Grad` dialing ry "the'efinp'e`ny to+pay$1 mB- Orange Countyto Make the ca'y;'
generally areposLeda4aniing Saiin- one 24-hour scientific survey in lion if the agency approves a plan said Christopher J.Eirahs,Aireftor
mars about potenYlal`risks. Hay and fwe.48-hour surmysfrom itorestart two mothballed,gas-rued of the Son Clements-bated Su*1_
But to cases like Huntington Juneto September. generators at the plant to boost the, derFoundation.
Beach when health officials only Reseeircheiswilltakewatersam- state's electrical supply. - I "The county heaith,oWcer Sias
suspect sewage is present, they pies every fivemeters from the sur, - The sanitation district money is demonstrated a conservative'and
have discretion in how to respond face to the ocean Door.Tests for sa- coming from its capital improve- consistent approach.I think cadre
In JWy 1999,a mile of shoreline unity,bacteria and sewage markers ment projects budget.The tllslrict's in pretty good hands."
4 III,, ,
ap ,pN
a
W� N4VE F�L-L C'CCOP- V52SiO S 31' -TW — 3�5T ASk-
.`
Urban Runoff Diversions
Q nn MV
'�•t
Background Dry weather urban runoff is contaminated wafer that is generated
from Inigating lawns,washing cars and hosing down driveways and anything
released Into stormdralns during dry weather,which flow into the ocean. People
often forget that this flow can be filled with pathogens,toxlcs, pesticides and other
ra materials and have the potential to contaminate beaches, leading to beach
closures.
The outcome of the summer of 1999 Huntington Beach closure investigation
indicated that the dry weather urban runoff flowing Into the Pacific Ocean,
.= . through the Talbert Channel, may have caused or contributed to the shoreline
contamination due to high bacteria levels. This event triggered the Orange
County Sanitation District(OCSD)to begin the dry weather urban runoff diversion
L: — program.
• OCSD's Program As part of a regional project to control urban runoff,
OCSD has agreed to reroute the dry weather urban runoff from stormwater pump
stations and storm channels located In the city of Huntington Beach and the city
of Newport Beach(Figure 1 and Figure 2),
Huntington Bcorh Pump Station Talbert Channel
stornwatnr Well Diwnlan Pump s�
• Dlraniun thatsF,�r "IP�1•m!
bfarnrBm -�!A, `;y ' D,Ir,W.Berms
• CountySanitation u
istrict
Vision— • Diversion Location PIA)ODC'ONTROLCI WNELSANDPUMPINGS'1'ArroNS �
In addition, projects LOCAITI)WITHIN 1).F.G & H WATERSHEDS
are under way In2nd water resource _=r--
Crystal Cove to • /
protect blologically m.r_
sensitive areas. m VI t"' "a"fir mire Afir�xtiix
mo«
PFAA
iiAR
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA L
�•vf.,f� .Aor visit ourweb site
A
DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF cumantyuruwrytecn
OCSD/050901/Urban aunoD.rdr paps I
In December 1999,OCSD's board of directors agreed to temporarlly accept and
r divert dry weather urban runoff Into Its sewer system for treatment and release
to the ocean. In April 2000, the board adopted a resolution for accepting urban
runoff on a long-term basis on days when It does not rain. The resolution Is
designed to: minimize adverse Impacts on coastal beaches and public health,
whlle maintaining the high quality of OCSD's primary function-collection,
treatment and disposal of sanitary wastewater to the sewer System.
Once again, on September 27, 2001, the board amended the resolution and
adopted a second resolution, which Included the following requirements:
of The amount of dry weather urban runoff flow will not exceed
10 million gallons per day
' • Dischargers located within OCSD's service area will not be required
to pay any fees associated with the approved discharge of dry weather
urban runoff Into OCSD's sewer system If the total volume of all dry
weather urban runoff discharges does not exceed 4 million gallons a dcP
If the flow exceeds 4 million gallons a day,the dischargers will pay for the
Alk dill"Ad cost of their discharge, which Is $321 per million gallons.
• Dischargers located outside OCSD's service area that OCSD permits
_ to discharge dry weather urban runoff to the sewer system will pay
a cost of$321 per million gallons discharged.
• Over the next three years OCSD Intends to evaluate the sources of
dry weather urban runoff, the qualty and quantity of dry weather urban
runoff discharges, and the costs associated with discharges.
• OCSD will accept urban runoff throughout the entire year on days
when B Is not raining.
• Discharge Permits The discharger must complete an application to obtain
wastewater discharge permit and supply certain required technical Information.
The permit Issued by OCSD will set the terms and conditions of OCSD's waste-
water discharge regulations including the general operational requirements for
dry weather urban runoff diversions. In addition, the discharger must enter
Into an agreement with OCSD.
• Current and Proposed Diversions
DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF DIVERSION FLOW
rwe of DallyAmoge
..� DBctwpers LacaSon N a g System
`M, (tuition StaNs Date
Galbns Per Daft
aN of ffun" Sfor rn ofen
Hwfi gton tOn 9 F=P Station 0.9 DhchagYg 19�to
Beach Beach Dnorooro eM
MESEM FLOWS 0.9
IMm Roach Nport Sforrmalm
Water MetBeach 1 p Sion n 0.4 Raposnc �l�
SMorm
N�orl Bsoch I Stormtlr n 0.2 DbcwroV 2001 to
h Beach Dversbn sent
3-Channel
l�~ CArersbm:
Cwnry of HwWglen Gneewre
Orange Beach 4 Banning.& 1 Ropowl 2001
Santo Ma rare
I-slorr voter
Pump Station
11r,PROPOSED AND CURREM FLOWS 2.5
OCSD/050901/Urban Runoff..<dr Po
Page 1 of 2
r 8
ROWN A0ALOW ELL
Want to subscribe to the *�/(�gtE12 -rNteSrR.uctuli>:
SoCal Water Resources Structuring WIN for Success Nov _ A MI>Ee4�
News? We cover it all, "yqr ti sAo
everyday: Water,waste- CASA and AMSA should support WIN as well as pa.nrr ux+.�
water,flood control, and responsible reserve funding C'
coastal water quality. P 9 fN1W7Ysr &oAN Fu"95
It's frost T1 wAteF 4ASTH✓AI'&
[05I01/01, Commentary by Blake Anderson]
Visit our subscription siteEHc��I M vErNlr.rs
at: 1 believe that that the WIN initiative must have two elements to be
effective and to become law: t, r6kz�t4
http://204.212.225.138/ FkCtO R'E5
socalh2onews/subscribe/ First, local share funding. Like the original Clean Water Act, a local
subscribe.htm share must be part of the formula—possibly a 75:25 federal/local
share for critical situations and a 50:50 share for non-critical
Or, simply e-mail the situations. The locals must be encouraged to raise fees for either
editor at pay-as-you-go funding or to pay off local financing.
kharlow(a?home.com with
your name,title, antl Elected officials must bite down on the fee bullet now. Federal money
agency. may give them reason to do the right thing and give them the political
cover as well.The original CWA was a terrific jump start to get
funding going.The WIN program will take the nation to the next level.
If the CWA was the equivalent of the Saturn booster engine,then
WIN is the second stage rocket to get the payload Into orbit.
Brown and Caldwell
Islas von 2606 sane zoo Second,asset management. In exchange for federal funding, the
Wine,CA 92606 9 g g,
(949)Tfi0-8182 phone local entities must adopt, in both policy and in practice, basic
(949)474.0940 fax elements of asset management. Regular maintenance, regular
inspections, regular publicly-reported inventories of the infrastructure
asset base, a financial plan for short term and long term rehabilitation
and replacement,a designated reserve policy, etc. Asset
management is absolutely necessary to keep the nation's and the
states'water protected from public sewage systems.
With these two elements in place,the federal government will have
reason to help the locals out this one time.This gives the federal
government a way to motivate local governments to get off the dime
and invest in their infrastructure.
C� xFmRNIA �Abclh CASA and AMSA should Support WIN. For some CASA and
@F SAN i trrrtoN f1C't�ci�5 AMSA members, there's reason to say"no"to this program.They've
got their funding in place.They've been responsible.They've done
the right thing.They,for good reason,resent those agencies that
�SUCr A-tt� u have not been responsible. Fine. All good points.
F
But there are some realities. For the big regional systems that have
satellite systems, 181 and upstream spills are having major impacts.
The aging satellite systems upstream of the regional systems cause
NAgT�A� Gl�OV� all sorts of storm water related problems.The public does not
differentiate between sewer spills and which public agency is
responsible. They just hear the word"spill."The political pressures
mount.And it doesn't even matter if the spills are in a particular
community. Headlines about LA have an impact on attitudes in
Orange County. And visa versa.
http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/asset/05-01_win_and_am.htm 05/02/2001
Page 2 of 2
The effect?A legislator in Sacramento or Washington DC decides
something must be done,a bill goes into the hopper,and may we
go,trying to bat away one more law or regulation that makes it
Impossible for the good guys to operate sensibly and cost effectively.
The CASA members have another reason to back WIN:The Little
Hoover Commission on Special Districts. CASA must take a
proactive and offensive position on all of the criticism that Little
Hoover leveled on wastewater treatment special districts.We were
criticized for having money in the bankl For goodness sake,we ought
to be held up as examples of responsible public agencies.The cities
and other entities that are cash-poor should look to us with
admiration.But that won't happen If we try to be quiet and defensive.
We should be celebrating and publicizing our financial strengths,not
sulking around about them.
The CASA board and staff should be producing brochures about how
much money we have in reserves and why we need it and where we
are going to spend it.We all should be telling our member agencies
about the frighteningly huge and real shortfalls that are present
throughout California.We should be asking the public whether we
want to look like shiny new California or the rusty aging Midwest.We
should be making the argument that public infrastructure is the basis
for quality of life and Pacific Rim competitiveness.
CASA should get behind WIN, insisting on a fee-based system that
gets local dollars to match federal dollars.
CASA and AMSA have meetings in May.CASA ought to revisit this
Issue In Yosemite.AMSA ought to revisit this Issue In Washington
DC.CASA should take a position that is formally conveyed to AMSA
for its consideration. I'll be at CASA.
. Blake Anderson is General Manager of the Orange County
Sanitation District
http://204.212.225.138/socaUi2onewslasset/05-01_win_and_am.htm 05/02/2001
I µ� SAft��tal'tcw pts7�'ccT is ,4
FpvNDl1.,Q MEM6foL OF x{�
oC-rJ�itoJ o� M�'H2oWf.-t'M�)
amsa� S�E � t�s. F.,L_t_y
oP TL{�c PoR:c-k*7oN EF TLtE CCvt�l-QY
�4EAK ct-tb fs.SSe'c 1At7CA/
CleanWaterNews
Dedicated to Environmental Improvement for Over 30 years
WIN Rally to Mobilize Congressional Support
at AMSA Policy Forum
AMSAs 2001 National Policy AMSA members will have the unique MNow Rally to Cop Hill Visits
Forum& 31st Annual Meeting. opportunity to hear from and talc with The aftemoon of May 22 has been set
May 19-23. will focus on the latest key legislators and regulators who will aside for AMSA members to visit their
regulatory and legislative developments provide their unique perspective on congressional delegations on Capitol Hill
in the nation's capital.This year's clean water in the new Administration ♦ con inued on page 2
Polity Forum, 71re New Political and the 107th
Landscape... Moving POTW Agenda Congress.
Forward,couldn't be more timely as
many of the Association's priority The Forum presents
issues are receiving a high level of a key opportunity
attention from the new Administration to carry your -and the 107th Congress. agency's message to national policy
Forum Program Packed with makers.Your
National Policy Makers agency's support
The new Administration and the 107th is essential to
Congress brings many new faces to moving the POTW _
important regulatory positions and agenda forward. 1 1 1
within the leadership of congressional
committees.Throughout the Foram
AMSA Active in Support of WIN
ANSA representatives appeared in Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)
a variety of venues this month to and participated on a water infrasttuc- National Enviroomenol
deliver the message to federal,state and ture financing panel convened during a Achievement Award Winners
local government officials that more meeting of the EPA Environmental to be Honored of AMSKs 31 st
money is needed for repair and replace- Financial Advisory Board's Cost Annual Meeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ment of the nation's water infrastructure Effective Environmental Management
systems.AMSA staff discussed the Workgroup.AMSA staff and members legal Perspectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
recommendations of the Water also were active in a several sessions at NRC launches Study on Land
Infrastructure Network's(WIN)Water the National League of Cities'(NLC) Application of Blosollds. . . . . . . . . . .6
Infrastructure Now.Recommendations Annual Congressional City Congress
for Clean and Safe Water in the 21 si attended by thousands of municipal
Century(WINow)report with Bush officials from around the country.
Administration officials at the U.S. • continued on page 3
National Environmental Achievement Award Winners to be
Honored at AMSA's 31 st Annual Meeting
AMSA's 2001 Boeldert(R-N.Y.), structure.WIC is also working to build
National Environ- Borski(D-Pa.),Bilirakis support for a renewed federal commit-
mental Policy Forum& (R-Fla.)and Brown ment to funding American's clean and
31st Annual Meeting (D-Ohio)with 2001 safe water infrastructure.
will highlight this year's Public Service Awards.
National Environmental Pedersen to Receive Public Service
Achievement Award Senator Smith serves Award of State level
winners.Selected by as Chair of the Senate's Craig D. Pedersen,Executive Admini-
AMSA's Awards Environment and strider,Texas Water Development
Committee,this year's Public Works Board,is being recognized for his vital
24 award recipients will Committee. Smith role in the planing and development of
be honored at the Policy firmly believes that water quality projects in the state of
Foram's Welcoming Senator Robert Smith (RN.HJ "the Federal Texas. In 1997, he helped implement a
Reception Sunday, will receive AMSA's 2001 Govemment must new state water plan created under
May 20,andd during Federal Public Service Awards reassess how environ- Texas Senate Bill 1,the historic legisla-
AMSA's Awards mental laws are regu- tion that established a water planning
Luncheon on Monday,May 21.AMSA lated to ensure that we only use the framework for the state.
is pleased to showcase the award winners best,peer-reviewed science and most
in this issue of Clean Water News. cost-effective methods to meet our Norwood Town Manager and
shared environmental goals." Chicago General Superintendent
Senator Robert Smith and Local Public Service Honorees
'The Killer Bs'Honored with The"Killers Bs;'Reps.Boehlert,Borski, AMSA's Awards Committee selected
Federal Public Service Award Bilirakis and Brown,were the driving John J.Carroll,Town Manager,
AMSA's Public Service Award recog- force behind the formation of bipartisan Norwood, Mass.,and Vice Chairman,
nizes public officials at the federal,state Water Infrastructure Caucus(WIC), Massachusetts Water Resources
and local levels who have displayed which has mobilized Congress to address Authority(MWRA),as a 2001 Local
extraordinary insight of the challenges our nation's water infrastructure funding Public Service Award Honoree.CaaoB is
facing wastewater treatment agencies. needs.As co-chairs of WIC,"The Killer being honored for his efforts in guiding
AMSA's Awards Committee is delighted Bs"educate fellow Members of the management of MWRA,and for his
to honor Senator Robert C.Smith Congress on the current status and long-standing service as a member of
(R-N.H.),and The Killer Bs—Reps. future needs of our nation's water infra- the MWRA Board of Directors.
Hugh H. McMillan,General
AMSA's 2001 Policy Forum, continued from Page 1 Superintendent, Metropolitan Water
Reclamation District of Greater
and meet with staff at EPA Headquarters. Capitol Hill reception in the Rayburn Chicago,Ill.,is also being honored
Attendees are urged to make the most of House Office Building's Gold Room. with a Local Public Service Award for
this opportunity to meet with clean water his many accomplishments and long
policy makers and discuss national water AMSA is excited about this year's Fomm tenure with the District. He played an
quality priorities as well as issues of agenda as many of the Association's pri- integral role in presenting the District's
local concern—especially important this ority issues are taking center stage in our position that made combined sewer
year with infrastructure funding receiv- nation's capital,and now is the perfect overflow projects grant eligible,which
ing increased attention'inside the time for PCTWs from across the country led to the approval of the Tunnel&
Beltway'and nationwide. to join AMSA to support essential initia- Reservoir Plan as the solution for
tives that will benefit the clean water Chicago combined sewer overflow and
Later that afternoon,Fomm attendees community for years to come. flooding problems.McMillan recently retired
will join members of the House of as Chicago's General Superintendent.
Representatives'Water Infrastructure Register Onliner
Caucus to rally for'Water Infrastructure Save the dates,May 19-23,2001,to AMSA Recognizes Battaglia for
NOW.'The WINow Rally will focus con- join us in DO Visit AMSA's Clean Water Local Award for Service Population
gressional attention on the crucial need on the Web site for the most up-l"ate Less Than 250,000
for water infrastructure funding across the conference agenda and registration cape- This year,for the first time,AMSA is
nation.After the Rally,join AMSA for a bilities,wivu•.mrsa-cleanrvaterorg. ■ presenting an additional award for local
public service in communities serving
less than 250.000 citizens.Leonard L. Commitee Chair,where he was instru- A
Battaglia,Secretary of the Board of mental in initiating the AMS.A{EP-A NAT11O'NAL�L111(��� �]
Directors for West County Wastewater Pretreatment Coordinators Workshop. EUU�1 O1L1Il,LU�I1�
District,Calif.,has devoted over 25 years p jl
m the District.His involvement began Presidents Award to be Presented to llChlQUe ,Ell AWARDS,
with the creation of the District,which Hollander and Schatz ll lllt�Il Llll t,ll
provided a more efficient disposal of The President,Award is given to Indl-
wastewater for the region. viduals who have made a significant Also being honored wish a 2001
contribution toward achieving AMSA's President's Award is Lisa E. Hollander,
Miele Awarded for goals and objectives.This year,AMSA Assistant General Counsel for the District.
Distinguished Performance President,William Pugh,will be present- As Co-Chair of AMSA's Sanitary Sewer
AMSA's Awards Committee selected ing the award to William B.Schatz and Overflow(SSO)Workgroup Hollander
Robert P.Meile,Former Technical Lisa E.Hollander,both of Northeast has worked diligently to develop
Services Department Head,Sanitation Ohio Regional Sewer District. AMSA's position on a national SSO
Districts of Los Angeles County,Calif, regulation and has provided legal and
and AMSA Board Member,as the win- William B. Schatz,General Counsel technical analysis on this critical issue.
ner of the 2001 Distinguished for the District,was selected for this
Performance Award.This award is pro- honor for his commitment to the Water Representative Saxton and Turner to
seated to individuals that were past rep- Infrastructure Network(WIN). Schatz Receive Environment Award
resentatives for AMSA member agencies represented municipal interests during AMSA's 2001 Environment Award,
and maintained an active role during four intense,facilitated discussions that which recognizes individuals for out-
their tenure.In addition to serving resulted in recommendations that boast an standing environmental service will be
AMSA's Board,Miele played an vital unprecedented army of backers,including awarded to Rep.Jim Saxton(R-N.J.)
role on several committees,notably as local elected officials,environmentalists, and Billy Turner,President of Columbus
Vice-Chair of AMSA's Regulatory labor,engineers,contractors and waste- Water Works,Ga.
Affairs Committee and as Pretreatment water and drinking water utilities. V continued on page 4
WIN Support, continued from page 1 WATER INFR TIRE NETWORK
WIN Prominent on Capital Hill fall be peer reviewed and pub- Congressional hearings are
On Capitol Hill,WIN members held an fished this summer. In a strong expected through the summer.
educational session for staff of the show of support for WIN,Senators
Northeast-Midwest Coalition,which is and Representatives on both sides of the Keep up-to-date on the latest news
a bipartisan group comprised of 114 rep- aisle called for increased spending to in water infrastructure funding by
resenlatives who recognize the common safeguard the nation's water and waste- visiting WIN's new web site at
problems facing their states. water infrastructure systems.Additional www.win-waterorg.■
Later in the month,hearings on water -
infrastructure funding needs were con-
ducted in both the House and the
Senate.Pat Kenney,Director of the -
Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater
Cincinnati,Ohio,testified on behalf of
AMSA members before the House
Transportation and Infrastructure
Subcommittee on Water Resources.
Gloucester,Mass.Mayor Bruce Tobey
represented the Water Infrastructure 'r -'�n, - ...v.d
Network(WIN)at the kick-off hearing
in the Senate Environment and Public Gloucester,Mass.,Mayor Brace Tobeypresented the Water Infrostrvclure Network's(WIN)
Works Subcommittee on Fisheries, position before the Senate Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Water, Pat Korney,
Wildlife and Water. Before the same Director of the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio,then made the case
Senate Subcommittee EPA far Infrosbucture funding during his testimony before the House Subcommittee an water
Administrator Christine Todd Whitman resources. "in an ero of unprecedented federal surpluses, I can't think of a better investment
cited studies by both AMSA and WIN than the health of our citizens,the integrity of our environment and the economic well-being
and told lawmakers she will ask that of our communities. Simply put, we can't afford to leave any community behind as we
EP.4's gap analysis of the funding short- oddness the looming national water and wastewater infrastructure funding crisis.'
The Delia Diablo Sanitation District. Branch/Big Crack Project: Reversing
P NATIONAL Calif.,is also receiving a Research&- Stream Bank Erosion."The goal of this
Hn TtlrQn Tj�r]� Technology Award for their"Power Plant initiative is to restore and improve the
RLllul ll n Il Cooling Recycled Water Supply and carrying capacity of an urban steam and
L^�1QTlelllell AWARDS Disposal Prolect."This project consisted to demonstrate to communities that soil
L1LLiL BUJ L jj�I�IL jj(( of the development,construction and bioengineering techniques are just as
operations of it req clod water plant, effective as typical"hard engineering"
cooling tower blow down water disposal techniques,and more beneficial to
National Environmental system and distribution system facilities. aquatic habitat.
The initiative was undertaken to reduce
Achievement Awards,
the District's current 14+MGD effluent Public Information &Education
continuer] from Page 3 discharge to the San Joaquin River,an Awards Honor Seven Agencies
imparted water body in Northern AMSA's Public Ltfonnation &
Rep.Saxton has championed envimn- California. Education Awards are presented for out-
mental issues throughout his eight terms standing programs in these categories:
as United States Representative for New Operations Award Honors Columbus, Video,Printed Publication and
Jersey's 3rd District.Saxton is noted for Go,and Tacoma, Wash. Educational Program.
his cost-effective solutions while main- Columbus Water Works,Ga.,has been
taining policy balance with state and selected by AMSA's Awards Committee Three agencies are being honored for
federal regulatory programs. to receive a 2001 Operations Award.The their exceptional video projects.
South Columbus Water Resources Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District,
Since 1989 Billy G.Turner has served Facility is a publicly owned wastewater Ohio,will be honored for their dynamic
as President of the Columbus Water treatment facility that was fully auto- video, Uncovering Cleveland's Sewer
Works, which serves more than 60,000 mated in July 2000,which resulted in System.Narrated by an animated water
customers. Under Turner's leadership, reduced costs,increased efficiency and droplet,this informative video walks the
major community improvements have becoming more competitive in the waste- viewer through the water cycle and niter-
been accomplished including an water treatment industry. ations of a water and wastewater utility.
eleven mile Riverwalk, several park
areas and a nationally recognized City of Tacoma,Wash.,has been Good Neighbors—The New Face of
advanced demonstration of wet selected to receive an Operations Award Wastewater Treatment is also being
weather treatment technology. for their"Wastewater Conservation honored in this category.Produced by
Loan Program."This project staned in Water Services of Clackamas County,
Thirteen Awards Honor Member 1998 and provides low interest loans to Ore.,the video demonstrates that new
Agency Contributions qualified residential and commercial technology and design coupled with
AMSA's Awards Committee reviewed property owners for private sewer repair increased sensitivities to neighbor's
35 worthy nominations for this year's or replacement. Since its inception 18 needs are resulting in a"new breed"of
agency awards.A total of thirteen agen- months ago,the program has granted wastewater treatment facilities that are
ties will be honored for their contribu- over 50 loans. more neighborhood friendly.
tions to the field of wastewater treatment
in the areas of Research&Technology, Phoenix, Northeast Ohio Honored for Little Blue Valley Sewer District,Mo..is
Operations,Public Service and Public Excellent Public Service being honored for then video entitled
Information&Education. The City of Phoenix,Ariz.,is being The Path of Least Resistance.The video
honored with a Public Service Award describes wastewater conveyance and
Research& lechrwlogy Recognizes for their`Tres Rios Constructed treatment for the general public and
Two Innovative Projects Wetland Demonstration Project:'Faced focuses on sanitary sewer overflows,
The Metropolitan Water Reclamation with$635 million of upgrades for their backups,the impact on the public health
District of Greater Chicago,Ill.,was Slat Avenue Wastewater Treatment and the environment.
selected for the 2001 Research& Plant to meet water quality standards,
Technology Award for its"Biosolids as the City began exploring cost-effective Hampton Roads Sanitation District,Va.,
a Topsoil Substitute for the Germination solutions to meet their needs.The Tres is being honored in the printed publica-
and Growth of Turf,Forage,Prairie Rios project resulted in the development tion category for their 60th Anniversary
Grasses and Wild Flower Plants"project. of a full-scale sustainable treatment sys- Commemorative Calendar.The calendar
The principal objective of this program tem that can meet their objectives in a was to developed to foster recognition
was to compare the germination and cost-effective manner. for the District's contribution to improv-
growth rates to determine which species ing water quality over the past six
are well-suited for growth in biosolids. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, decades and to build and maintain
As a result,the District's biosolids have Ohio,will also receive a 2001 Public awareness and support from key state
been successfully used as a topsoil sub- Service Award for their"Chevrolet and local elected officials.
stitute for a variety of projects.
0 •continued on page 5
City of Tacoma,Wash.,is being honored Day"program.This project is dedicated A
for their innovative educational program, to promoting and preserving the tradition N�A(TI jO"NALit
the EnWwChallenger.The Envim- of Virginia fanning. ERmroRPal
Challenger is a modified,colorfully Ulf 0jpainted van that carries hands-on,inter- Lastly,AMSA will honor Central RDS
active lessons to elementary school Contra Costa Sanitary District,Calif_
classrooms to teach children how their for their educational program—Our
- -- --
daily activities affect the environment Water, Our Word Pesticide Reduction
and how changing their behavior could Program.This program is a broad-based and prumom Integrated Pcsi
improve water quality. public education campaign that pro- Management through eye-catching,
motes less toxic pest control to protect point-of-sale displays and fact sheets.
Also,being awarded for educational water quality.The District is working
programs is Hampton Roads Sanitation with 13 local hardware stores and gar- AMSA looks forward to honoring these
District,Va., for their"Celebrate Farming den centers to stock less-toxic products individuals and organizations in May.■
"Extinction, after all, is irreversible. As the ESA comes closer to urban These include EPA approval of state
If a species becomes extinct, we are left areas,the species encountered are likely water quality standards and National
to speculate forever on what we might to be some never thought of or known Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
have learned or what we may have real- about before.They could include a sub- (NPDES)permitting programs.The
ized.If we conserve the species, it will species of beach mouse,an invertebrate AMSA-supported MOA marks these
be available for the study and benefit of insect,an aquatic plant, or a small song- agencies' improved implementation of
future generations." bird that may appear nothing but ordi- the ESA's Section 7 consultation
nary to the passing observer.These are requirement.This provision requires
Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, that all federal agencies ensure that their
4F6 (4th Cir. 2000); cart. denied actions are"not likely to jeopardize the
Gibbs v. Norton, 121 S.Ct. 1081 continued existence of any endangered
(Feb. 20, 2001) species or threatened species or result in
the destruction or adverse modification"
of the species'critical habitat.
Aparticularly challenging visitor The ESA already has made lasting
may arrive in your town soon— just some of the endangered species that impact on some AMSA members,like
the Endangered Species Act recently have thrown a wrench in the those in the Pacific-Northwest where
(ESA)of 1973.If history is any guide, permitting or development wheel for salmonid listings have permanently
its arrival will not go unnoticed. In the various interests in documented legal affected regional CWA implementation.
U.S. today there are 971 total endan- cases. Even though the Supreme Court Other publicly owned treatment works
gered and 273 threatened species and held this January in the Solid Waste (POTWs)in California have been chill-
plants—70 and 44 of which respectively Agency of Northern Cook County Clean ing their effluent for years so it is dis-
are fish—making it possible that a listed Water Act(CWA)case that"Ir]egula- charged at the proper temperature for
species may one day be found in your tion of land use(is] a function tradition- endangered steelhead salmon in the
receiving water.The ESA's role as a ally performed by local governments", receiving water.A few AMSA members
powerful environmental decision mak- the discovery of an endangered species have had early indications that reduc-
ing tool became clear in the famed 1978 changes the roles and brings the federal lions in stormwater sediment may be
Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA)case government's interests prominently to required to avoid impacts on endangered
involving the snail darer and the Tellico the table.Working through ESA fish.The scientific uncertainties accom-
Dam. Despite the geographic diversity requirements,such as the development parrying the determination of what steps
of listed species,the ESA still is per- of Section 10 Habitat Conservation are needed to protect certain species
ceived as a law that only impacts the Plans,are certain to lead to constmc- only complicates ESA questions.
timber, fishing and farming interests, lion,expansion,or permitting delays—
and often in remote,still largely wild, and present public relations challenges We will not hear a fresh Supreme Court
and often federal lands. Continued sub- to those whose activities conflict with view of the proper role of the ESA any
urban expansion and the resulting pres- the species, time soon. On February 20,2001,the
sures brought on our land, water Supreme Court declined to heat the most
and other natural resources,however,is In January 2001, EPA and the Fish and recent ESA case presented to it,Gibbs v.
making it more likely that endangered Wildlife and National Marine Fisheries Norton,involving the reintroduction of
species will meet up—and conflict with Services completed a Memorandum of red wolves in North Carolina. Gibbs
—essential urban activities such as Agreement(MOA)to memorialize how questioned the very constitutionality of
wastewater treatment. these agencies will more effectively the now nearly three decades old statute.
consider the endangered species impacts
of federal Clean Water Act decisions. ♦continued on pope 6
Borba review 'real problem' Page 1 of
JjELL�V� l`t'EhT' tTS A MA`S 0/= TIM"; 8�
Anderson, Blake /W-�- of Co-rNo �ht2cE5 r�'tovE ro rttE i�^�Rdt
..n,�y andYBs So 641 T- t T- We'J' - GE >`Asy
From: Michael Tumipseed [m.tumipseed@prodigy.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 05,2001 5:25 PM
To: Tom Woodruff; Tom Nixon; Ray Miller; Ray Kearney; Mike Sullivan; Mike Moore; Layne Baroldi;
Judy Wilson;Jim Stahl; Jeremy Neill; Bob Horvath; Blake Anderson
Subject: Borba review'real problem'
0loeal iLlte,ita(vtslirlbt<aliWmimr hcxne
r Comment an en
Borba review 'real problem'
Filed: 0510512001
By CHRISTINE BEDELL, Californian staff writer e-mail:
cbedell@bakemfield.com
Experts are questioning the practicality and fairness of a judge's
order that George and James Borba - if they want to build their
dairies -- must study how millions of cows in eight counties foul the
environment.
Accurate information on the cumulative impact of all dairies in the
San Joaquin Valley air basin simply does not exist, regulators,
planners and attorneys said Friday, a day after the ruling.
And undertaking such a study is a monumental task, they said,
especially for two cousins and their advisers.
"No doubt about it, this is a real problem," said Deputy County
Counsel James Thebeau, who is working with the Borbas on the
case.
Attorneys opposing the Borbas and county in court don't think the
order's too tall.
The cousins can glean good information from studies that Kings,
Tulare and other counties have completed on dairies and apply it
to their own, said Caroline Farrell of the Center on Race, Poverty
and the Environment.
"This is a realistic step that will give people some context as to
how the project will affect the environment," Farrell said.
05/08/2001
Borba review'real problem' Page 2 of 3
Kern County Superior Court Judge Roger Randall requested that
and other environmental reports in a ruling that essentially blocks
the Borbas from building their twin 14,200-cow dairies at Taft
Highway and Buena Vista Road.
Technically, the Borbas can build until a judge requires Kem
County to issue a stop-work order against the projects, Planning
Director Ted James said Friday after consulting with county
attorneys.
James Borba has grading and building permits for his dairy;
George Borba has grading permits, James said.
And it's still possible the Borbas would fight such an order, said
their attorney, Michael Remy.
Remy agreed with the experts'take on Randall's call for a regional
study.
'We're gonna try like heck to satisfy the judge," he said. 'We'll still
have to see if we can."
The problem is that there are an enormous number of dairies in
the eight-county area -- reports from 1999 to today show about
1,460 -- and many are operated differently, said Kings County
Planning Director Bill Zumwalt.
So Farrell's tactic would not do a whole lot of good, he said: "You
can make rough generalities but why would you go to such
expense for rough generalities?'
State and valley air boards can't regulate dairies and so have not
analyzed their emissions, he also said.
'This would be a monumental task,'Zumwalt said of Randall's
charge.
To make matters worse, about 60 percent of Central Valley dairies
were approved "by right"--without extensive environmental review
and public comment — so little is known about them, Remy said.
The judge's order is not just difficult, it's "fundamentally unfair"to
the Borbas, Thebeau argued.
More information could be available soon, said Robert Feenstra,
executive director of the Milk Producers Council.
Dairymen and scientists are conducting an unprecedented amount
of environmental research, he said.
In his written decision, Randall outlined tasks the Barba
consultants could have done but didn't do in preparing the Borba
environmental impact report.
05/08/2001
Borba review 'real problem' Page 3 of 3
A lot of information about Kern County's dairies is available, he
wrote.
Randall said that during oral arguments, officials "were unable to
explain" why they did not "go to traditional sources of farm
information" such as the University of California farm adviser's
offices in Kern and surrounding counties.
"The judge recognized that they could have taken reasonable
steps and did not,"
ot" Farrell said. That's all that state environmental
law requires, she said.
Ralph Phillips, University of California Cooperative Extension farm
adviser in Bakersfield, agreed there's a dearth of information about
dairies' air impacts.
He and his colleagues on the county Dairy Technical Advisory
Committee didn't find much as they researched dairy issues for
the Board of Supervisors over the last year, he said.
It would be difficult, Phillips also said, for someone to test for
emissions like ammonia at a dairy and know what's coming from
the farm and what's coming from other sources.
Lack of funds accounts for the lack of science, he said.
"There just hasn't been the money for it," Philipps said.
"Research isn't cheap."
ru mme¢on 0
v mis kkJJ
back to Wp home
Copyrigh[02gg1,the aakeageld Calil mian I Email the Webmaster y�led all
Privacy Policy 5laiemanl I Terms of Use - p0 a21%
05/08/2001
Judge halts Borba dairies Pagel of 3
Anderson, Blake
From: Michael Turnipseed [m.tumipseed@prodigy.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 05,2001 5:24 PM
To: Tom Woodruff Tom Nixon; Ray Miller; Ray Kearney; Mike Sullivan; Mike Moore; Layne Baroldt;
Judy Wilson;Jim Stahl;Jeremy Neill; Bob Horvath; Blake Anderson
Subject: Judge halts Borba dairies
Save on all your favorite stuff
t local Ole Vahrrsfirlb Enlifominn Shane
1 Comment an a0 C� [his Ro
Judge halts Borba dairies
Filed: 0510412001
By CHRISTINE BEDELL
Californian staff writer
e-mail: cbedell@bakersfield.com
Project on hold pending more environmental review
A judge blocked construction of the Borba dairies in favor of more
environmental review Thursday, reopening a planning dispute that
embroiled southwest Bakersfield for more than a year.
The judge also requested more scientific data on the impacts of all
dairies — existing and approved — in the eight-county San Joaquin
Valley Air Basin.
Cousins James and George Boll will comply with Kern County
Superior Court Judge Roger Randall's order and tell him what he
wants to know within 30 days, George Borba said.
"It's not that big of a deal," he said. "The judge has asked for more
information, and we're going to give it to him."
But that won't be the end of it.
The county Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors will
have to review whatever new scientific information the Borbas
produce and re-vote on the dairies.
And in the lawsuit--filed by the Center for Race, Politics and the
Environment—defense attorneys said there's little available data
05/08/2001
Judge halts Borba dairies Page 2 of 3
on the total impacts of dairies in the region.
Locally, Borba dairy opponents foresee a whole new fight— and
feel better armed for it.
"Justice has prevailed," said southwest Bakersfield resident Mary
Berglund. "The Borbas haven't been the good neighbors they
promised to be and I'm glad to see they will have an opportunity to
do better."
The project, approved by the Board of Supervisors in July 2000,
eventually would put more than 28,000 cows on two dairies at Taft
Highway and Buena Vista Road southwest of Bakersfield.
The Borbas have graded the site but have not begun to build.
They still are operating their Chino dairies and have no target
construction date here.
The cousins first proposed the dairies in early 1998, and to settle
another lawsuit from the center agreed to prepare an
environmental impact report later that year. It was the first dairy
EIR undertaken in Califomia.
Community opposition began to swell in late 1999 and largely
centered on the dairies' potential air and water impacts and
smells.
A month after the supervisors'4-1 vote to approve the project—
with Ken Peterson dissenting —the center filed its second suit.
The Sierra Club later became a co-plaintiff.
Bakersfield residents tried to set aside the supervisors' decision by
placing a Borba referendum on a countywide ballot. But they failed
to gather enough signatures to put the matter on the ballot.
Of Randall's ruling Thursday, center attorney Caroline Farrell said:
"The judge ruled against us on one minor point but the rest is all
good."
Michael Marsh, chief executive officer of the lobbying group
Western United Dairymen, said he hoped for Kem County's sake
the ruling won't deter other dairy operators from trying to locate in
Kem.
He took strong aim at the center,whose finances he recently
asked California congressmen, including Kem County's, to
investigate.
Western United Dairymen has accused the group of improperly
using money for the poor to cripple businesses, something the
center denies.
The center"has been very successful at putting people out of work
in the Central Valley and, unfortunately, this seems to be another
05/08/2001
Judge halts Borba dairies Page 3 of 3
in their hat," Marsh said.
Randall, meanwhile, asked the Borbas to analyze the:
* Cumulative impacts of Kern County's 34 existing dairies; three
additional recently approved Kern dairies; and the existing and
approved -- but not yet built — dairies in the San Joaquin Valley Air
Basin.
* "Feasible" alternatives to the Borba dairies, including a smaller
version.
* Health impacts of dairy-generated particulate matter, or dust, and
how much the Borba project would kick up.
* Practicality and efficacy of an aerobic treatment system for
waste.
* Cost of cleaning up project groundwater contamination.
* Volume of leakage anticipated from the dairy lagoons "in a
fashion comprehensible to members of the public and the board"
Kern County Counsel Bernard Barmann declared the Borba
project "effectively reopened."
There is an upside to Randall's order, he said —the Borbas now
know the extent to which they should study their dairies.
The ruling did not surprise him, Barmann said.
"It's not unusual for this kind of cleanup to be required (of
environmental documents)," he said.
CCammeman
W.),to wp home
cop",112001,The aakersfeld Califomen I Email lbe Webmasler p�reE By
Pnvacv Polwv Slatemenl Teems—o�se .e.Plod i
B
05/08/2001
FrSanta Ana Watershed
Project Authority
SAWPA Safe Reliable Water...To Protect and Provide
March, 2001
SAWPA—Bringing Diverse Interests Together
Try to envision a 2,650 collectively to draught- five member agencies, the southwestern San
square-mile semiarid proof the watershed in the Eastern Municipal Water Bernardino Counties. See
jackrabbit haven, where face of numerous District, Inland Empire map at left.....
local water supplies challenges. Utilities Agency, Orange SAWPA's
consisted of a few days of SAWPA understanding of the
torrential downpour, was formed in r,\i'^ Watershed and ability to
followed by ten months of 1972 to >�:Yy .y,,`. S/'^"" collaborate with regional
like theesert famine. Sounds perfect setting for maintain and A r .y(� .� coanstruct a host of
ers has been sed to
YJ�eiFe. "
a disturbing episode of regional plans, J successful projects. The
Mutual of Omaha's Wild programs and Santa Ana River
Kingdom, but it's sobering projects that Interceptor, or SARI line,
to consider what Southern will protect the transports salty water
California's coastal and Santa Ana �1. \ more than 100 miles from
inland regions would be River Basin \. �\} the Inland regions to
like without their history of water proper disposal in the
cooperation among resources to ocean. The joint powers
diverse water interests. maximize authority has also built
Santa Ana Watershed beneficial uses within the County Water District, San two operating desalters,
Project Authority(SAWPA) watershed in an Bernardino Valley numerous pipelines and
has become a conduit for economically and Municipal Water District, water treatment facilities
bringing all of the environmentally and Western Municipal to improve the area's
watershed's stakeholders responsible manner." Water District. Its total water quality. But
for regional solutions to Since then,the area, 2,650 square miles In SAWPA's largest success
their common water organization has provided all, brings in much of to date has been securing
management needs. a unified voice for the Orange County, a sliver of more than $250 million
Under SAWPA's water management needs Los Angeles County, and dollars in state money
leadership, local leaders of the Basin's more than the major population from the most recent
have stepped up to the five million people. centers of western statewide water bond,
public works plate, striving SAWPA is composed of Riverside and Proposition 13.
Safe, Reliable Water...Who could ask for anything more? Inside this issue:
Birds, bees, flowers, trees and the environment. The IWP, which &SM Nngw wew z
people all have one need in common-we received $250 million in funding from waMr.a wcambs
all depend on a clean and reliable water Proposition 13 in the Southern avanary'PP°
supply. With the help of its California Integrated NWMd1Mr z
member agencies, SAWPA Watershed Program,
has taken great strides contains scores of projects fnOmnmenMUnredam z
toward drought-proofing planned regionally by
the entire Santa Ana River SAWPA, but implemented Caaonuea funomg ON 3
Watershed. The Santa Ana by local agencies. The a me wamrsnee's furore
Integrated Watershed Program (IWP) projects contained in the IWP consist of N.I.noes"ter 3
promises to sustain industry and six major program categories: ware from,
families with only positive effects on (wnfinue0 oo~d)
No Such Thing as "New Water"
Orange County's Visionary Approach to Recycling
Mother Nature has been wastewater using high-tech aquifers. The water will greatly
recycling water since the beginning membrane technologies including improve the quality of the existing
of time. Whether we are talking reverse osmosis, microfiltration and groundwater by reducing mineral
about snow melting into lakes and ultraviolet disinfection. These are levels before it is pumped out for
streams or rainfall and use throughout the county.
Imported water percolating ���� This process will reduce
Into South Coast groundwater Orange County's dependence on
basins, all water has had a imported water sources, especially
previous life. during times of drought. It will also
The Orange County Water eliminate the need to construct a
District and the Orange new$170 million ocean outlet to
County Sanitation District handle increased wastewater
have developed a system that discharges and It will enhance the
blends the cutting edge of environment by reducing these
water treatment technology discharges Into the ocean.
with natural purification A decision by the two district's
processes. This Groundwater boards of directors to move
Replenishment(GWR)System is a the same technologies used by forward with the project is
multi-step water recycling and bottled water, pharmaceutical and expected early this year. The GWR
purification process that will create food manufacturing industries. The System has broad-based support
70,000 acre-feet of near-distilled water will then be pumped into in Orange County and throughout
quality water each year. The GWR spreading basins where it will the Watershed, and it is truly a
System will purify highly treated naturally filter into the region's vast "win-win"for all stakeholders.
Nature's Purifier
Many Californians are under helps to recover the endangered
the Illusion that the water needs of LEAST BELLS VIREO.
people and those of wildlife are Southern California's century of
never compatible, but we have development has tended to short
discovered that this is untrue. The change waterfowl by building over
Orange County Water District has scarce wetlands or diverting the
operated an artificial wetland for water that would normally sustain
almost a decade in the Chino area, them. SAWPA believes that
and the SAWPA member agency through continued development of
has realized estimated water natural and artificial wetlands along
treatment cost savings of more the course of the Santa Ana,this
than $10 million annually. The negative trend can be reversed. In
system works by taking nitrate-rich total, the IWP calls for the creation
water from the river and easing it of up to 10,000 acres of wetlands
through man made wetlands. In and open space, 5,000 of which is
the swampy environment, nitrates located in Prado Basin. These
are absorbed and used by the wetlands will facilitate the
abundant plant life. Not only does percolation of runoff and river
this practice help purify tainted water into the water table. A
water-accomplishing the same number of projects similar to
goal as treatment plants-it opens OCWD's have been approved by
� significant Southern California SAWPA to receive funding, and
�' ". . acreage to migrating birds and two are now in the works.
P,.2 Santa Aga Watennea
Continued Funding Environmental Invaders
The plants, roots and inundated with a pesky invasive
Will be Vital to the
microorganisms in the artificial species of non-native cane called
Watershed's Future wetlands will increase the Arundo Donax. The huge
tremendous benefit in removing bamboo-like grass can reach
It is no longer reasonable to nitrates in local water supplies, heights of 40 feet, and collectively
believe Southern California can but another plant is a real it guzzles as much as 37,000
indefinitely increase water resource problem. Much of the Santa Ana acre-feet of water every year-
imports from other parts of the River and its tributaries are enough to meet the annual water
state and nation. The Santa Ana needs of 74,000 families.
Watershed's unique mixture of "ifs; il, Reducing the cane
urban and rural areas will require presence in the watershed
significant and ongoing effort if we and replacing It with native
are to meet our complex needs habitat is a high priority for
relating to growth, water quality SAWPA and the regional
and the environment. But the partners. Up to S30 million
steps being taken in the IWP by
has been allocated from the
local water agencies may SCIWP program in the
permanently alter the way water bond to rein in these
Southern California is viewed by
environmental invaders.
the state's water community at
large. SAWPA's plan for the
region's future has already realized Answer: The Faucet . .
much of its tremendous potential thanks to the recent infusion of Question: Where Does Water Come From?
statewide bond money, but more resources are certain to be needed For consumers, what demands and Its Incorporation
if we are to sustain our progress. happens before water comes out into the District's overall water
There are opportunities of the faucet is a mystery. One of supply plan will free up additional
nationally to receive funding from the key elements in the water Colorado Aqueduct supplies.
the federal government for projects delivery process that is often These Innovative projects are
that are already underway, as well overlooked is the system of creating great alternative uses for
as ones that have not yet been pipelines that transfers water recycled water and increasing the
initiated.This is currently being from its point of origin to its point area's overall supply. Both
pursued on a regional basis of residential or industrial use. projects have received the
through the CalFed effort. Two such pipelines in the necessary environmental
SAWPA also anticipates future IWP are almost ready to break approvals and will soon be
opportunities to take advantage of ground. The Yucaipa Valley among the first to receive
statewide bond measures similar Water District pipeline is part of a Proposition 13 funding.
to Proposition 13, and discussions program to utilize recycled water Congratulations to Yucaipa and
are beginning in for wetlands and habitat in order Western on a job well done!
Sacramento to offset the need for
for a bond that imported water. The .'Aeijlly�r x
focuses on Western Municipal
improving
Water District pipeline
water quality. will convey non-
potable water from a
groundwater basin for -'
irrigation uses in _ ]�
Western's service area ..i
r and provide for basin
cleanup with storm
runoff. Western's m
non-potable water ..
Santa Ana Watarahed Pe9.3
u _
SAWPA
Santa Ana Watershed MR. BLAKE ANDERSON
Project AuthorityORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
J 10844 ELLIS AVE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-7018
11615 Sterling Avenue
Riverside, California 92503
(909) 785-5411
Safe Reliable Water...
To Protect and Provide
Visit us on the web NEXT EDITION:
r Nature's Underground Goldmine...
The Chino Basin
Safe, Reliable Water .. from page 1
Groundwater Cleanup and Purification will Water Recycling is the product of a major attitude
mitigate negative groundwater impacts shift in water use, and the IWP encourages
from nearly a century of agricultural and recycling and reuse as a means to reduce
other industrial land use practices our area's overall consumption; and
primarily through the construction of <pa increase our ability to squeeze every drop
(a
desalting facilities; from local water;
Water Storage will enable the Watershed to Recreation and Conservation will bring much-
withstand a major statewide drought by needed connected recreational opportunities
storing upwards of 1,000,000 acre-feet of to the region, providing access to the river
new water underground throughout the M4,61 open spaces and increasing public
basin; awareness of the Santa Ana's environmental 0
opportunities, needs and importance.
Flood Protection will keep lives and
property safe and keeps contaminants The ambitions of SAWPA's IWP are unprecedented
out of the Santa Ana River; in Southern California history, but this$3 billion,
20-year plan with over 200 integrated projects will
Wetlands, Habitat and the Environment will all be accomplish much of its drought-proofing work
enhanced as 10,000 acres of man-made and natural within the next five to ten years. The$250 million
wetlands are constructed and improved, from the state water bond (Prop 13) has been
actions that will improve water quality and instrumental in getting these projects off the ground,
help restore the West's now-hindered but there will be an ongoing effort to gain matching
Pacific Flyway for native migratory birds; funding from the federal government.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District to be held one , 20jg_l, was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on_ZjaP,_ L7 _ , 20�/.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
Penny M.Kyle, Secret
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
1\RADON\DATAI\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC
Y '
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
www.ocsd.com
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 23, 2001 —7:00 p.m.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than
72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation
District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please
navigate to the Board of Directors section.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, if any.
City/Acencv Active Director Alternate Director
Irvine Beth Krom Greg Smith
Irvine Ranch Water District Brian Brady Darryl G. Miller
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or
matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
05/23/01
Page 2'
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June
Board Meeting).
8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the joint regular meeting with
Orange County Water District on March 28, 2001, and the minutes for the regular
meeting held on April 25, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by
the Chair.
9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 04/15101 04/30/01
Totals $4,902,067.85 $5,456,619.31
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will
be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted
by one action approving all motions,and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on
the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the
regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar
not specifically removed from same, as follows:
a. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, City of Los Alamitos, a charter city v.
Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 01 CCO2192, in connection with eminent domain of the public road project
commonly known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement Project" in the City of
Los Alamitos; and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the
interests of the District.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
05/23/01
Page 3
'J
11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 23, 2001 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on April 25, 2001 to be filed.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re May 2, 2001 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 2001 to be filed.
C. Approve a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Karen Monaco and
Associates to provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial
Information System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one year period
effective July 1, 2001, with option to renew for one year.
d. Approve the Purchase of an IBM AS400 Model 820 (Specification
No. E-2001-4413D) in support of the District's Financial Information System, for
an amount not to exceed $400,000 including all hardware, software, all
applicable maintenance and applicable taxes. The purchase to be made by
soliciting sealed bids from authorized IBM dealers.
e. (1) Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations
and approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with
SeaVisual Consulting, Inc.for services to analyze, interpret and report current
meter data, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not
to exceed $129,884, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with
an option to renew for three one-year periods; and (2) authorize the General
Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve Amendment
No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.for services to
evaluate the effects to the coastal marine environment of the discharge of treated
wastewater effluent, for an additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total
amount not to exceed $186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June
30, 2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods.
f. (1)Authorize the General Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000
from the FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary
design and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and (2) approve in
concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification
No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for FY 2001-
2002.
05/23/01
Page B t
g. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and
miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time
and miscellaneous contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES Power Plant
portion of studies,for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination
Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85,for a total project budget of$2,925,000;
(2) authorize staff to seek reimbursement from AES Power Plant for$350,000;
(3) authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts,
including those in excess of$100,000, with government agencies, universities,
consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those
contracts; and (4) pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies
relating to said project would be made available by the District.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
May 17, 2001 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
May 17, 2001 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 05/23401 Board Meeting.)
C. Approve a Sole Source Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for
development of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2 for a total
amount not to exceed $308,000.
d. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo& Moore,
and Converse Consultants to provide for materials testing, inspection, and
geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification
No. PSA-2001-3313D, for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for each consultant
for July 2001/2002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional
one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement for
July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for
each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($300,000 total).
e. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS
Consulting, and Bush 6 Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD,for an amount not to exceed
$120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000 total), with the option
to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed
$170,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an
amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000
total).
f. Approve Professional Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and
Electro Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD,for an amount not to exceed
$70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000 total), with the option
to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed
$150,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an
amount not to exceed $175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004
($350,000 total).
05/23/01
Page 5
g. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer
System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc.,
authorizing an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total
contract amount to$8,810,056.56; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 for an
adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of$90,780,
increasing the total contract amount to $8,900,836.56; and (3)Accept
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract
No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and
approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
h. Ratify Change Order No.1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant
No. 1, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of$2,692
and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount
to $943,308.
I. Establish a budget of$144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer
Protection Project, Contract No. 11-14R.
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee re the May 9, 2001 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 9, 2001 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2001.
d. Receive,file and approve the Third Quarter Financial Report for the period
ending March 31, 2001.
e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2001.
f. Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period
May 15, 2001 to May 15, 2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not
to exceed $75,724.
g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-10, Directing the County Tax Collection-
Treasurer to include Sanitary Sewer Charges on the 2001-02 Property Tax Bills.
16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re May 14, 2001 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 9, 2001, to be filed.
O5/23/O1
Page 6 }
17. 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, 2) award a contract to
Pioneer Americas, Inc. for the Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution No. C-150, for the
period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002,with four one year renewal options, for an
estimated annual amount not to exceed $969.117.
18. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-15, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange
County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities
Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to
Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing
Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSDA 1, and OCSD-13 (as recommended by
the FAHR Committee):
a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 11, 2001.
b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-15 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be
adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.)
C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and pass to second reading and
public hearing on June 27, 2001.
19.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes
final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures
of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re Crow Winthrop Development Limited
Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 000002012 (Government Code Section 54956.9)
2. Confer with General Counsel—Anticipated Litigation—Government Code
Section 54956.9(c), one potential case.
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered In closed session
20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
05/23/01
Page 7
21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
22. Adjournment
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14
days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal
communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
May 23, 2001 —7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has
been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
i meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion
and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any:
a. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, the Mortelette Family Trust v. Orange County
Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CC01525, for alleged
property damage in connection with Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-41-1; and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the Interests of the
District.
Wead\datal\wpAtMagenda\Board Agendas\2001 Board Agendas\052301supplemenlal.doc
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date To Bd.of Dir.
s/23/DI
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item (a)Rr
]1 um
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Mike White, Risk Manager
SUBJECT: SUMMONS RE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, THE
MORTELETTE FAMILY TRUST V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT, ET AL.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, the Mortelette Family Trust v. Orange
County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01CC01525,
for alleged property damage in connection with Relocation of Lido Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-41-1; and 2) authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the
interests of the District.
SUMMARY
Please see attached memo from General Counsel.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
Memo from General Counsel.
/pk
weadld.Wl p dl.0101eddrd Age.da R.11l .'eras Ad<odd Rep]de'O`AI\ham 21(a1.d.
RBbsed.W30*8 Page 1
LAW OFFICES OF
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: General Counsel
DATE: May 17, 2001
RE: The Mortelette Family Trust, Robert Tighe v. Orange
County Sanitation District, at al., OCSD No. 01CCO1525
On May 17, 2001, the District was served with a summons and complaint by the
above-referenced Plaintiffs, arising out of the Construction Agreement with Advanco
Constructors, Inc., Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract 2-41-1. Plaintiffs, whose
residence is located in the direct location of the construction activities, allege damage to
person and property.
Pursuant to the Construction Agreement with Advanco Constructors, the District
is entitled to and will require Advanco to secure counsel and represent the interests of
the District. However, it is recommended that this matter be referred to the General
Counsel to appear and defend, in the event Advanco fails or refuses to do so.
THOMAS L.WOODRUFF
GENERAL COUNSEL
TLW:pI
cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson
Mr. G.G. Streed
Mr. D.A. Ludwin
Mr. J. Linder
Mr. M. White
Ms. P. Kyle
MORTELETTE
t
i
Orange County Sanitation District
Orange County Water District
MINUTES
Joint BOARD MEETING
MARCH 28, 2001
�OJN� SAN►Tgl�oy
z
o �
�r
Fcr�N TG HE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
v Page 2
03/28/01
ROLL CALL
A joint meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District and the
Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District was held on March 28, 2001, at 6:30 p.m.,
in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll
was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill
X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonton
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd John Larson
X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall
X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada
X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer
X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall
X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt
X Tony Kawashime Tracy Worley
X Beth Krom Mike Ward
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy
X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams
X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow
A Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Peer Swan Darryl Miller
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary;
Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed;
Sonja Wassgren; Jean Tappan; Jim Herberg;Wendy Sevenandt; Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hagan; General Counsel; Don Hughes; Jerry King; Iry Pickier;Jan
Flory;West Bannister; Kathryn Barr, Denis Bilodeau; Lawrence P. Kraemer, Jr.; Philip L. Anthony;
Jan Debay; Brett Franklin; Clarke Ide, General Counsel; Bill Mills, General Manager; Janice
Durant; Andrew Czomy; John Kennedy; Tom Knoell;Tom Dawes; Andrea Haas; Martha West;
John Bonsangue;Tim Sovich; Laura Cernog; Ryan Irish; Dan &Tiffany Buter; Judy Wootton; Stan
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 3
03/28/01 r
Wooton; Jeremy Davis; Bruce Dosier; Carl &Donna Nelson; Mike Samples; Judy-Rae Karlsen;
Mike Wehner; Nira Yamachista; Stephanie Strohman; Patrick A. Lewis; Rita Hirrthian;J.L. Davis;
Shivaj Deshmurk; Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Michelle Tuchman; Bill Tappan; Alberta
Christy; Debra Bums; Kelly Bum-Roy; Dick Cornell; Ron Wildermuth; Joan Irvine Smith; Mary K.
Antonelli; Irwin Haydock; Joseph Racano; Larry Porter; Fred Bockmiller; Jim Atkinson; Lou Baker;
Ronald C. Schlenker, Justin McCusker; Marge England; Judith Gielow; Reed L. Royalty; Patrick
Scanlon; Jim Sullivan; Bruce Chalmers; Dennis Kasper; Ronald Schlenker; Jim Ross; Richard Bell;
Terry Lane; Bill Everest; John T. Morris; Paul R. Brown; Kevin Alexander; Dick Sudak; Ken
Stedman; Tricia Jakubiak; Ed LaBahn; Dan Walker; Steve Ro; Dr. James Gales; James Peterson;
Keith Lyon; Sister Sharon Fritsch; Sister Madguita Domingo; Edgar Fandialan; Don Herz; Steve
Tedesco; Michael Boess; John Carlson; Diana Leach; Don Calkins; Mike Wellborn; Fred Broush;
Ted Poponchah; Ian Skidmore; Linda Feffer; Mike Payne; Ted Butteriss; Bob Kellison; Dave
Houston; Robert M. Bell, Jr.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Norm Eckenrode, Chair, welcomed those attending the joint meeting of the Orange County
Sanitation District(OCSD)and Orange County Water District(OCWD) regarding the groundwater
replenishment project(GWR). He stated that this project would be the single best project for
Orange County residents and businesses.
Mr. Eckenrode announced the Anaheim City Council unanimously endorsed the groundwater
replenishment project and supported the formation of a Groundwater Producers Advisory Group.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the following correspondence:
• Orange County Groundwater Producers letter dated March 25, 2001
• Orange Coast Watch letter dated March 22. 2001
• Mesa Consolidated Water District letter dated March 23, 2001
• Irvine Ranch Water District letter dated March 27, 2001
• Alicia K. DeFrezna letter dated March 27, 2001
• Phillip J. Stevens letter dated March 26, 2001
• National Water Research Institute letter dated March 27, 2001
• Orange County Business Council letter dated March 28, 2001
Chair Eckenrode reported that an additional condition in connection with Agenda Item No. 1 was
added as Agenda Item No. 1(f)to establish a groundwater producers advisory group and
implement to the degree possible the eleven points in the groundwater producers letter dated
March 25, 2001.
Jerry King, President of the Orange County Water District Board of Directors, then gave a brief
verbal report to his Board of Directors
Iry Pickier, Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee was
recognized who reported on the future needs of water within Orange County. He stated that grants
in excess of$57 million have been obtained,with additional grant requests pending. The
remainder of the costs will be split between OCWD and OCSD. He applauded Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California for its many efforts to provide future water reliability for Southern
California in the face of cutbacks in the Colorado River and threats to water from Northern
California.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 4
03/28/01
William R. Mills, General Manager of Orange County Water District, reported that the GWR project
is a safe, economical, and environmentally responsible solution to Orange County's future water
needs and will be a major part to ensure that something similar to the energy crisis does not
happen to our water supply.
Blake P. Anderson, General Manager of Orange County Sanitation District, gave a brief report on
the GWR project and addressed cost issues and water quality issues. He stated it would take half
as much power to reclaim the water than it takes to import water. Reclamation of water has been
going on within the state for over 30 years. This project provides additional technologies such as
microfittration and reverse osmosis.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mary K. Antonelli of Huntington Beach stated that the water reclamation project is a good idea but
feels that full secondary treatment should be addressed before going forward with the groundwater
replenishment project.
Irwin Haydock of Fountain Valley stated he was in favor of the water reclamation project.
However, he asked the Directors for a promise to provide a web-based tool to allow the public to
participate in the project, planning, modeling, implementation and monitoring, in order to forecast
future environmental, economic and societal implications of what your actions accomplished
tonight.
Jan Vanderslood of Newport Beach spoke against the groundwater replenishment project until all
wastewater is subjected to full secondary treatment prior to being sent to the ocean outfall. He
was also concerned with increased pollution to the ocean and limits being exceeded beyond what
the Clean Water Act has approved.
Eileen Murphy of Huntington Beach urged the Directors to go to full secondary treatment of its
effluent that will be put into the ocean.
Joseph Racano of Huntington Beach warned Directors that to approve this project would be the
subject of scorn and ridicule for generations. The project would increase the impurities put through
the ocean outfall with less water causing increased bacteria and damage to the ocean. He stated
that reverse osmosis was not foolproof and there would be an increased probability of injecting
viruses into our drinking water. He was also concerned that by the time mistakes are discovered,
remedies will be costly and late in coming. He feels the entire project is a thinly veiled scheme to
stop salt-water intrusion so the building industry, which owns our politicians and our politics, can
continue on their merry over-building way.
Larry Porter of Newport Beach asked Directors if the groundwater replenishment system project
was the final solution.
Fred Bockmiller of Costa Mesa spoke in favor of the groundwater replenishment system project.
He expressed concern about costs and feels the groundwater producers have made a set of
recommendations that are sound and will help keep costs in control. He challenged Orange
County Sanitation District to look at issue of cost sharing. Currently OCSD is committed to 50% of
the capital construction costs, and they are not committing in any way to operational and
maintenance costs of the project.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 5
03/28/01
Jim Atkinson of Mesa Consolidated Water District addressed the Directors and expressed support
for the groundwater replenishment project and the inclusion of Item 1(f). He would also like to
Include a member from each of the boards to participate in the advisory group.
Lou Baker of Huntington Beach addressed the Directors who spoke in support of the groundwater
replenishment system. However, he feels more study needs to be done prior to $34 million being
spent in contracts and also urged the district to discharge cleaner water through the outfall.
Ronald C. Schlenker of the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County spoke in support
of the groundwater replenishment project.
Justin McCusker, representing the Orange County Business Council, spoke in support of the
groundwater replenishment project. A letter was submitted to the Board in support of the project
that evening.
Judith Gielu, representing the Orange County League of Women Voters, spoke in support of the
groundwater replenishment project.
Reed Royalty, representing the Orange County Taxpayers Association, spoke in support of the
groundwater replenishment project.
Patrick Scanlon of the Groundwater Producers Council spoke in support of the groundwater
replenishment project.
Joan Irvine Smith spoke to the Directors in support of the groundwater replenishment project. She
also stated that it was imperative that the freshwater and marine environments be protected. She
requested that the Orange County Sanitation District look into alternative methods of the sewage
outfall and problems associated with it.
Director Peter Green then requested staff to comment on statements made that evening on public
Information programs and the ability to access information via the website on a continuing basis.
Mr. Mills of the Orange County Water District stated there was a website, gwrsystem.com, where
current information would be available.
Blake Anderson, General Manager of Orange County Sanitation District, responded that access to
information by the public is also available on the district's website, ocsd.com. He stated that the
301(h)waiver is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board. The permit has extensive requirements the District must consistently
achieve. Issues related to the level of treatment and the impact on the environment is of supreme
Importance to OCSD. He assured the public that the District's marine monitoring program assures
that the District is effectively protecting the environment and public health. This summer the
District will be spending an additional $2 million on extensive studies to test the hypothesis that
was suggested by Dr. Stanley Grant of LICI, that suggests under certain oceanographic conditions
there is a possibility that the edge of the District's plume is pulled into shore. If these studies
suggest that a higher level of treatment is required, Mr. Anderson assured this Information would
be released immediately to the public by the Orange County Sanitation District.
RECESS: The Chair announced a 10-minute recess.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
V Page 6
03/28/01
RECONVENE: The meeting reconvened at 8:14 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Irwin Haydock of Fountain Valley addressed the Directors about Director Peter Green's question
and the webslte available through the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation
District, as well as a website for the National Water Research Institute. His request and concern
was not what he was requesting. He was requesting a system that would allow everyone to
determine what is happening, how it is going and how It affects all the other things. He also
requested that information be timely and more current than what is currently provided.
1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
SYSTEM
Bill Mills, General Manager of OCWD, explaining items 1(a)through (0, gave a brief staff report.
A motion was made and seconded to amend Item 1(0 to remove the words"to the degree
possible". Directors entered into a lengthy discussion regarding the eleven points In the
groundwater producers' letter.
A substitute motion was made that Item 1(f) include "to not exceed the useful rrfe of the project".
Some Directors expressed concern over the language of Item 1(f)and thought the wording should
include"approve in concept". There was concern that the groundwater producers group would
then take over the project and they would become the dictators of the project and the OCSD and
OCWD control would be negated and would have to comply with every single word on the two-
page document of the eleven points.
As a point of order a Director questioned if Item 1(f)needed to be voted on to add as an
emergency item. General Counsel Brad Hogin explained the item did not need to be added as an
urgency Item because it is within the scope of the posted agenda item, which is a broad item of
business within the meaning of the Brown Act to discuss authorization to proceed with the
development, design and construction of the groundwater replenishment project. This item is
requesting to add a specific condition to the general thrust of the proceeding with the project, and
not adding an additional agenda item within the meaning of the Brown Act.
A question was directed to General Manager Blake Anderson and his thoughts on the wording
within#1(f). His suggestion was to leave the language as originally drafted and submitted, or to
include"approve in concept". Staff has already expressed to the groundwater producers that each
of the eleven points will be considered in good faith. Many of these items have significant
technical, managerial and financial merit but the long-term operation of these two agencies belong
to OCSD and OCWD. General Manager Bill Mills also recommended the item be adopted as
submitted to the directors.
Additional discussion was entered into among the Directors.
A roll call vote was then called on the substitute motion on Item 1(f)to delete the phrase"to the
degree possible"and include deleting the phrase"incorporating a maximum 25—year debt". The
motion failed by a vote of 7 ayes to 17 noes.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 7
03/28/01
Director Swan made a motion that the consideration of the groundwater replenishment project be
tabled for 90 days during which time the Joint Cooperative Committee can hire another
engineering firm to do a value engineering design on the $34 million sole source design contract to
make sure the design is the best that is possible and allow time to answer questions being brought
up tonight and to come up with language that will be acceptable between the groundwater
producers advisory committee and the Joint Cooperative Committee. The motion failed by a vote
of four ayes and 20 noes.
It was then MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:
A. Find that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)guidelines, Section
15164, that some changes or additions to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR certified in
October 1999 are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162
have occurred and that Addendum No. 1 is approved.
B. Find that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)guidelines, Section
15164, that some changes or additions to the EIR/EIS on the Groundwater
Replenishment System certified in March 1999 are necessary but none of the
conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred and that Addendum No. 1 is
approved.
C. Authorize the Orange County Water District, in conjunction with the Orange County
Sanitation District, to proceed with the final design, construction and operation of the
Phase 1 Groundwater Replenishment System under the direction of the Joint
Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee.
D. Establish and find that construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System is
feasible, necessary, and beneficial to the lands of the District, and establish a project
budget of$352 million ($352,000,000). (This item was an Orange County Water District
only item. OCSD did not vote on Item 1(d).)
E. Approve a budget amendment to the Orange County Sanitation District project budget
of$4,478,000 for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No.J-36,for a total
project budget of$182,700,000.
F. Establish a groundwater producers advisory group and to the degree possible
implement the eleven points in the groundwater producers' letter dated March 25,2001.
Directors Steve Anderson, Shawn Boyd, John M. Gullixson, Mark Leyes, Mark A. Murphy and Peer
Swan opposed.
2. INTERIM GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:
A. Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the
Groundwater Replenishment System, granting the Orange County Water District Board
of Directors authority to award a contract for the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline—
Theo Lacy Parking Facility in an amount not to exceed $5 million ($5,000,000)and to
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
y Page 8
03/28/01
approve change orders not to exceed 10% of the original contract amount, and granting
the Orange County Water District General Manager authority to sign permits and
contracts.
B. Approve agreement between the Orange County Flood Control District, the County of
Orange and the Orange County Water District for providing early construction of
Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline within County property adjacent to the Theo Lacy
Jail Facilities and for reimbursement of costs for construction of County parking facilities
over the pipeline. (This item was an Orange County Water District only Item. OCSD did
not vote on Item 2(b).
C. Approve the plans and specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline—
Theo Lacy Parking Facility, for the early construction of a portion of the Groundwater
Replenishment Pipeline and parking lot for the Orange County Sheriffs Department and
authorize staff to advertise for competitive bids.
3. CONSULTING AND STAFFING SERVICES FOR FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
START-UP SERVICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GROUNDWATER
REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:
A. Approve Addendum No. 3 to Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. increasing the authorized
amount by$29,924,187, from$5,039,920 to an amount not to exceed $34,964,107 for
final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater
Replenishment System. The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County
Water District and Orange County Sanitation District.
B. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Separation Processes Inc.,Task Order No. 201301
increasing the authorized amount by$1,455,530, from$445,880 to an amount not to
exceed $1,901,410 for the final design of the Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis
components of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The amount shall be shared
equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District,
C. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Task Order No. 201312 with Carl R. Nelson, increasing
the authorized amount by$371,000,from $61,200 to an amount not to exceed
$432,200 for four years of project support In securing permits, rights-of-way
agreements, reviewing plans, and providing liaison with agencies during construction,
and water pipeline construction overview. The contract includes annual hourly rates at:
• $89 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
• $92 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003
$95 per hour for April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004
$98 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005
The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange
County Sanitation District.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 9
03/28/01
D. Approve a Task Order to Gerald Jones dba Linjer Company,for an amount not to
exceed $97,400 for specialty services for the final design of the Groundwater
Replenishment System, which includes assistance in developing and implementing the
integrated computerized systems and the supporting business plan. The amount shall
be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange County
Sanitation District.
E. Approve Addendum No. 4 to Task Order No. 200539 to James W.Williams increasing
the authorized amount by$148,400,from$35,000 to an amount not to exceed
$183,400 for specialized engineering services for four years of project support for
securing permits and rights-of-way agreements, providing technical review,and serving
on an independent review team at:
• $89 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
• $92 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003
• $95 per hourforApril 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004
• $98 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005
The amount shall be shared equally between Orange County Water District and Orange
County Sanitation District.
F. Approve Addendum No. 2 to Task Order No. 202091 with Debra Burris, dba DDB
Engineering, Inc., to provide engineering services and serve as Project Coordinator for
the Groundwater Replenishment System, increasing the maximum hours from 1500
hours per year to 1800 hours per year, and extending the contract time from October
11, 2003 to October 10, 2005 at hourly rates of:
• $90 per hour for October 11, 2003 to October 10, 2004
• $93 per hour, October 11, 2004 to October 10, 2005
(Current approved rates vary from$78.75 per hour for October 11. 2000 to October 10,
2001, to$86.82 per hour for October 11, 2002 to October 10, 2003.) The cost is
estimated at$700,000, to be shared equally between Orange County Sanitation District
and Orange County Water District.
G. Approve a four-year limited-term Orange County Water District employment agreement
with Thomas M. Dawes to act as Program Manager for the Groundwater
Replenishment System at hourly rates of:
• $95 per hour for April 23, 2001 to April 22, 2002
• $97 per hour for April 23,2002 to April 22. 2003
• $99 per hour for April 23, 2003 to April 22, 2004
• $100 per hour for April 23, 2004 to April 23, 2005
The Limited-Term Employment contract provides for hourly rate compensation, no
benefits, a maximum pay of 40-hours per week, and contract cancellation on a 30-day
notice. The contract amount will be shared equally between Orange County Sanitation
District and Orange County Water District.
Joint Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 10
03/28/01
H. Approve a four-year limited-tenn Orange County Water District employment agreement
with Laura Thomas to manage project tasks in the electrical and instrumentation
disciplines for the Groundwater Replenishment System at hourly rates of:
$75 per hour for April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
$78.75 per hour for April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003
$82.69 per hour for April 1,2003 to March 31, 2004
$86.82 per hour for April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005
The Limited-Term Employment contract provides for hourly rate compensation, no
benefits, a maximum pay of 40-hours per week, and contract cancellation on a 30-day
notice. The amount shall be shared equally between the Orange County Sanitation
District and the Orange County Water District.
Directors Mark Leyes and Peer Swan opposed.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:31�pp.m/.
6' /�/.za
Secretary of lt Board o irectors of
Orange Count Sanitafib District
GAw AtMagenda\Board Mlnutes\2001 BuaM Minutes\032801.iointminutw.dm
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
April 25, 2001
oJNty SAH1Tgr�oy
9
O y
Fcr�N HE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 2
04/25/01
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,was
held on April 25, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge
of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as
follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill
X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd John Larson
X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall
A Brian Donahue Bill Estrada
X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer
X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall
X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt
X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley
A Beth Krom Mike Ward
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy
X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson
X Russell Patterson Richard A Freschl
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams
X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Peer Swan Darryl Miller
Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary;
Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Mark
Esquer; Paula Zeller; Sonja Wassgren; Ingrid Hellebrand; Chuck Winsor;Jan Collins; Ryal
Wheeler
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Alternate Director Alberta Christy;
Don Hughes; Dean Albright; Joey Racano, Irwin Haydock; Jan Vanderslool; Dennis Baker; Don
McGee; Greg Saul;Judith M. Gielow; Brian Brady; Greg Woodside;Tony Henrich
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 3
04/25/01 •�
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the
waiver. Don McGee, Jan Vandersloot, Dean Albright, Joey Racano, Irwin Haydock, Dennis Baker.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that if they left the Board Room during the meeting for
recusant purposes during a vote,they must notify the Board Secretary or other minute taker that
their action should be reflected in the minutes. Leaving the room will not be noted in the minutes.
Chair Eckenrode announced that the PDC Committee would be meetin�q on May 17 at 5:00 p.m.
The change in date was due to the League of Cities meeting on May 3 .
Chair Eckenrode also announced that he was inviting the following Directors to attend upcoming
Steering Committee meetings, as follows:
May 23, 2001 Director Beth Krom
June 27, 2001 Director Tony Kawashima
July 18, 2001 Director Alice Jempsa
August 22, 2001 Director Tod Ridgeway
September 26, 2001 Director Roy Moore
As a reminder, the Chair reported that nominations will be open at the Mat 23rd board meeting for
the election of the Chair, and the election would take place at the June 27 meeting for both the
Chair and the Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District.
It was announced the District received an award from the Government Finance Officers
Association for the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year ended June
30, 2000. This report qualified for a certification of achievement for excellence in financial
reporting. The formal presentation of this award will be made at a future meeting.
It was also announced that the District was the recipient of the California Water Environment
Association's State Award for Small Budget Public Education Program. This award was for the
District's Orange County Fair booth in July 2000. Ingrid Hellebrand, Communications Specialist,
who was in charge of the effort,was then recognized and gave a brief slide presentation of the
effectiveness of the District's booth at the Orange County fair.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson, General Manager, responded to some of the public comments received that
evening regarding the District's plan for the next few months relative to the level of treatment of
ocean discharge. Efforts would be focused on ocean science, treatment technology and related
financing, regulations and permitting issues, and communication outreach.
Mr. Anderson then reported the District was in receipt of a report Issued by the Orange County
Grand Jury titled "Sewage Spills, Beach Closures: Trouble in Paradise?" The report deals with the
management of restaurant grease in Orange County, and recommends there should be standard
countywide grease ordinances that specify proper maintenance and the local sewering authority
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 4
04/25/01
should be required to enforce the ordinances. The report, sent to 50 public entities, will require
every agency mentioned in the report to respond within the next 90 days to the issues.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
The General Counsel had no report.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 28, 2001 be deemed
approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A"
and 'B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/01 03/31/01
Totals $4,825,838.23 $5,013,868.88
Director Patterson abstained on warrant number 34663.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11, DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the April 25, 2001 meeting.
The Chair ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 28,
2001 to be filed.
12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 4, 2001 to be filed.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal
report was presented by Director Patterson, Vice Chair of the Planning, Design and
Construction Committee, re the April 5, 2001 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held April 5, 2001 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Grit
Removal System, Job No. J-52, with Norman A. Olsson Construction Company,
authorizing an addition of$73,120 and 20 calendar days, increasing the total
contract amount not to exceed $811,547.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the plans and specifications
for the Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 3-2-1, on
file at the office of the Board Secretary.
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 5
04/25/01 1
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide engineering services for Trunk
Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No.1.98, for an amount not to exceed $1,166,000;
and (2) Approve a budget amendment of$1,354,000 for Trunk Sewer Mapping
Project, Contract No. 1-98,for a total budget of$1,709,000.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 8 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Plant
Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing additional engineering
services for benefit/cost evaluation of 71 liquid stream reinvention ideas, and the
production of eleven additional P&ID drawings, in the amount of$240,945,for a
total amount not to exceed$7,736,724.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Establish a budget of$715,000 for
Clarifiers E and G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1.
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the
Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group to provide additional services
related to the Capital Project Management Process Phase 1 Report in the amount
of$18,969,for a total amount not to exceed $115,886.
14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 11, 2001 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 11, 2001 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report
for the month of March 2001.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Resolution No. OCSD O1-09,
amending Resolution No. 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and
Procedures Manual.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve 2001-02 Budget Allocation
and Delegation of Discretionary Authority to the FAHR Committee for Initiation of
Forensic Audits or other investigations if determined by the FAHR Committee as
necessary, in an amount not to exceed $30,000.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an At-Will Employment
Policy for the Executive Management Team.
Directors Gullixson and Leyes opposed.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve agreement with Steve
Filarsky of Filarsky&Watt, LLP, to serve as District's Labor Representative re
SPMT Group meet and confer process in accordance with the recommendations of
the FAHR Committee; and to provide the FAHR Committee with a copy of the
executed agreement.
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 6
° 04/25/01
15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment
System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 19, 2001 to be
filed.
16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (a)Authorize the General Manager to
negotiate terms and conditions for a renewal of the contract with BP Energy Company for
Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28, at the floating Southern California
Border price plus marketers premium, with provisions for four one-year extensions, for an
estimated annual amount not to exceed $3,900,000; and (b)Authorize the General
Manager to solicit proposals, negotiate, and award a new contract for the Purchase of
Natural Gas, Specification No. C2001-38-BD, at the floating Southern California Border
price plus marketers premium, with provisions for four one-year extensions effective
August 1, 2001 per,for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $3,900,000 should the
negotiations for a renewal of the contract with BP Energy Company fail; and, (c)Authorize
the Director of Finance, If market conditions are favorable,to negotiate fixed prices under
the new or renewed natural gas contract, before the effective date of the contract and
during the duration of the contract, without further Board authorization.
17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the
plans and specifications for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment
Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-lA, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)
Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to Southern
Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant
Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1A, for an amount not to exceed $6,329,000.
18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No.1 to the Letter
Agreement dated September 22, 1999.with Municipal Water District of Orange County
(MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program, authorizing an increase In the
annual funding of$41,250 for years two through five of the program, increasing the total
annual amount to $866,250, and a total project amount not to exceed $4,275,863.
19. There was no closed session.
21. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize consideration of Item 21(b)
and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which
requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section
54954.2(b)(2).
b. The Director of Engineering gave a brief verbal report.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Flow Accommodation
Agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District to allow the US Food &Drug
Administration (FDA)to discharge sewage flow from a new FDA laboratory to the
Orange County Sanitation District, in a form approved by General Counsel.
Director Peer Swan abstained.
Minutes for Board Meeting
Page 7
04/25/01 1
Director Peer Swan announced that he would no longer be a Director for the Sanitation District
effective May 15, and introduced Brian Brady who will be appointed by Irvine Ranch Water District
as the District's representative.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Secretary of 16e Board (rectors of
Orange County Sanitati n District
G1wodW\agenda\Board Mlnutes\2001 Board Minutes\042501.doc
Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
34160 Escrow Solutions $ 525.000.00 Construction 5-52
34161 City of Newport Beach 40,000.00 Construction-District's Share of Dunes Area Nuisance Flow Diversion Project
34162 Orange County Sanitation District 440,699.73 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
34163 Southern California Edison 60,763.36 Power
34164 Airgas Safely 1,215.18 Safely Supplies
34165 Albertson's 17,795.78 Refund Connection Fee
34166 All American Asphalt 8,415.00 Paving
34167 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,589.26 Long Distance Telephone Service
34168 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.77 Telephone Service
34169 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4.698.74 Cellular Telephone Service
34170 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment
34171 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
34172 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 103.44 Office Supplies
34173 Court Order 150.00 Wage Gamishment
34174 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,459.31 Electrical Supplies
34175 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 320.00 O&M Meeting Registration-Califomia Water Environment Association
34176 CWEA-TCP 25.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34177 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
34178 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
34179 Verizon California 1,366.57 Telephone Services
34180 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 200.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34181 Intl.Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction
34182 Wine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use
34183 Lusatia 115.00 Meeting Expense
34184 MarVsc Electronics 16.34 Electrical Paris&Supplies
34185 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 433.21 Plumbing Supplies
34186 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 3,206.36 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training
34187 Optic Software 1,800.00 IT Training Registration
34188 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
34189 OCEA 495.12 Dues Deduction
3419D Pacific Bell 21.98 Telephone Services
34191 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 1.955.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34192 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
34193 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
34194 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.D0 Dues Deduction
34195 Registrar,Air&Waste Management Assoc. 597.95 Air Quality Meeting Registration
34196 Reliastar 8,397.40 Employee Medical Health Premium
34197 Rutan&Tucker L.L.P. 1.922.02 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
34198 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 814.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34199 glamor, Larsen&Marsh 6,500.00 Prof.Sew.-SAR Watershed Group;Chino Basin$1,500 Transfer; Dairy Prod.$2.000 Transfer
34200 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 8.66 Plumbing Supplies
34201 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
34202 Southern California Water 69.01 Water Use
34203 Southern California Water Committee,Inc 750.00 Membership
34204 Sparkletls 1.544.10 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 03101/01 to 03116101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34205 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee
34206- State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annexation Fee
34207 Stale Board of Equalization 1,200.00 Annexation Fee
34208 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee
34209 Stale Board of Equalization 3W.00 Annexation Fee
34210 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,191.07 Mechanical Supplies
34211 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
34212 Water Environment Federation 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration
34213 Jeffrey Brown 1.202.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34214 Pongsakdi Cady 773.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34215 Bradley H.Cagle 280.51 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34216 Danny L. Dillon 397.92 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34217 Robert Gaggle 153.49 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement
34218 Andrei loan 792.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34219 Dustin Le 559.94 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34220 Julie A.Matsumoto 788.38 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimbursement
34221 Chung M. Nguyen 329.57 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34222 Jagadish C.Omganti 780.59 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34223 John W.Swindler 692.51 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34224 Robert J.Thiede 1,037.82 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement
34225 Michael D.White 812.72 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement
34226 Ernest N.Yeboah 785.99 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement
34227 Moms C.Ying 197.25 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement
34228 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee
34229 California Dept.of Fish and Game 1,390.50 SARI Realignment&Protection Fee
34230 Local Agency Formation Commission 6.350.00 Annexation Fee
34231 Orange County Sanitation District 1,563.60 Petiy Cash Reimb.
34232 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee
34233 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee
34234 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee
34235 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee
34236 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee
34237 State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annexation Fee
34238 University of California, Irvine 35.00 Administration Meeting Registration
34239 RPI/Bio Gro 57,922.51 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
34240 Blue Cross of California 186,266.51 Medical Insurance Premium
34241 Carollo Engineers 53.940.39 Engineering Service P266
34242 Computerized Facility Integration 56.750.00 Engineering Service J-25-1
34243 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 66,525.30 Computers-4 Servers&2 Printers
34244 Hach Company 25,279.62 Meters&Accessories
34245 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28.093.52 Medical Insurance Premium
34246 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 57,453.55 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
34247 Margate Construction, Inc. 431,191.00 Construction P2-39
34248 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 58,837.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99
34249 Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. 45.000.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Digester No.9 at Pit. 1
34250 Orange County Sanitation District 27.611.36 Worker'.Comp. Reimb.
Page 2 of 9 `
Claims Paid From 03/01/01 to 03115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34251 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 88,547.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
34252 Polydyne, Inc. 36,646.62 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
34253 Projects Partners 71,893.28 Temporary Employment Services
34254 So.Cal.Gas Company 33.067.64 Natural Gas
34255 Tule Ranch/Megan Farms 75,233.93 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
34256 Vulcan 25,497.68 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
34257 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 76,672.33 Legal Services MO7-26-95
34258 J W Contracting Corporation 36,333.00 Construction P2-60
34259 Olssan Construction,Inc. 45,500.00 Fuzzy Filler Piping Installation
34260 A Biederman,Inc. 32.20 Instruments
34261 A-Plus Systems 7,855.70 Notices&Ads
34262 Accutite Fasteners, Inc. 166.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34263 Action Door Repair Corporation 500.00 Door Repairs
34264 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,254.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34265 Alfa-Laval,Inc. 4,499.53 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34266 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 675.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
34267 Aquenl, Inc. 8,131.25 Temporary Employment Services
34268 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server
34269 Artistic Blinds 403.20 Mini Blinds&Installation
34270 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal
34271 RO Instruments 30D.00 O&M Meeting Registration
34272 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 63.95 Telephone Service
34273 AWRA 500.00 Sponsor-American Water Resources Assoc.
34274 Baker Recognition Solutions 1,272.02 Employee Service Awards
34275 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 21,515.00 Telephone Equipment
34276 Robert Beshura 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program
34277 Battery Specialties 31.25 Batteries
34278 Bauer Compressors 144.99 Safety Equipment Repairs
34279 Bentley Systems,Inc. 5,375.01 Software Maintenance Agreement
34280 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 16,777.17 Professional Services-P7-76
34281 Blinn&Young,Inc. 4,235.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies
34282 Boot Bern 64.49 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
34283 Breit F.Sanders,Ph.D 1.500.00 Professional Services-TAC Meetings J-85
34284 Kevin Briggs 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34285 Richard Buck 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34286 Bush&Associates,Inc. 4,200.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
34287 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 437.09 Wire Rigging
34288 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,157.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34289 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 120.00 Membership
34290 Southern California Marine Institute 20,465.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support
34291 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 12,265.00 Engineering Services-EXTRAN Modeling Services
34292 Capital Westward 1,382.45 Mechanical Parts
34293 Cardinal Scale Manufacturing Co. 953.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34294 Career Track 533.36 Source Control Training Registration
34295 Cad Warren&Co. 505.84 Insurance Claims Administrator
34296 Carrillo Engineers 2.11M.50 Engineering Services-J-66&IMANS Testing
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34297 Caltrcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1,105.76 Engineering Services-J-52
34298 Chapman Unheisi(y 7.500.00 Leadership Training Fees
34299 Clayton Controls 214.17 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
34300 Coast Fire Equipment 1,156.07 Service Agreement
34301 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 4,080.00 Professional Services-08 M Budget Process Manual Preparation
34302 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,636.12 Electrical Supplies
34303 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 44.19 Plumbing Supplies
34304 Converse Consultants 4,469.00 Consulting Services-11-17-3
34305 Cooper Energy Services 3,686.32 Engine Supplies
34306 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training
34307 Corporate Express Imaging 944.89 Computer Supplies
34308 Corporate Express 938.00 Office Supplies
34309 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09
34310 Cost Containment Solutions 640.82 Workers Comp.Services
34311 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 16.03 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
34312 Auditor Controller Collections 4,028.00 Parcel Map Landbase Data
34313 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,266.92 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
34314 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Repairs 8 Maintenance
34315 Cytec Industries 14,499.00 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
34316 CASA 225.00 ECM Meeting Registration
34317 CCP Industries 5,287.19 Janitorial Supplies
34318 CEM Corporation 316,93 Lab Maintenance
34319 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5,455.13 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3.38.1
34320 CR 8 R, Inc. 946.00 Container Rentals
34321 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service
34322 CT Electric 11,250.00 Outdoor Lighting Installation at Plant No. 2
34323 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 145.00 Laboratory Meeting Registration
34324 CWEA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34325 De Guelle Glass Co.,Inc. 1,184.46 Safety Glass
34326 Del Mar Analytical 408,00 Biosolids Analysis
34327 Najef J. Deriss 748.21 Reconciliation User Fee Program
34328 Detector Technology 1,108.75 Lab Parts 8 Supplies
34329 DeZunk do Misco/Southwest 12.058.47 Plumbing Supplies,Repairs 8 Maintenance Materials
34330 Diamond H Recognition 249.80 Employee Service Awards
34331 Brian D. Donnelly 830.38 User Fes Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34332 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 235.98 Paint Supplies
34333 DDB Engineering,Inc. 9.060.00 Temporary Employment Services
34334 DGA Consultants,Inc. 1,836.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
34335 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 337.34 Electrical Supplies
34336 Earth Resource Foundation 1,500.00 Sponsorship
34337 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 808.00 Medical Screening
34338 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
34339 Emironmental Sampling Supply,Inc. 222.04 Lab Supplies
34340 EquipCc 901.33 Instrument Mainl.
34341 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,D37.79 Professional Services-Legislative Advomle
34342 FedEx Corporation 91.96 Air Freight
Page 4 of 9
Claims Paid From 03101/01 to 03/16101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34343 Albert Feese 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34344 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 309.84 Lab Supplies
34345 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1,739.46 Pump Supplies
34346 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 20,209.09 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium
34347 Fountain Valley Camera 31.72 Photo Supplies
34348 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 265.48 Truck Wash Tickets
34349 Franklin Covey 31.18 Office Supplies
34350 Fry's Electronics 409.51 Computer Supplies
34351 FM Intema9onal, Inc. 1,785.29 Professional Services J-25-1
34352 G&L Realty Partnership L.P. 748.21 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34353 Ganshl Lumber Company 94.34 LumberlHardware
34354 GanaO-Callahan Company 2,547.71 Chemicals
34355 Gemini Associates,Inc. 14,272.25 Fiber Optic Cable
34356 George Yardley Co. 326.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34357 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 121.65 Ball Filler Press Supplies
34358 Gold Systems,Inc. 3.485.00 Professional Services-Ocean Data Collection,Storage&Interface
34359 Golden Ball Products 11.583.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes
34360 WW Grainger,Inc. 1.177.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34361 Great Scott Tree Service,Inc. 7.040.00 Tree Planting Services
34362 Wayne Griffin 630.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34363 GMN Company,L.L.C. 3,125.38 Sewer Service Fee Rebate
34364 Edwards Systems Technology 2,168.75 Service Agreement-Fire Ala"System
34365 Verizon California 4.707.44 Telephone Services
34366 Harbour Engineering Group 21,486.10 Wemco Impellers&Pump Supplies
34367 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples
34388 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 279.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34369 Herb's Blackforeat Bakery&Deli 35.00 Meeting Expenses
34370 Henan Miller Workplace Resource 175.44 Light Fixture
34371 Hilo,Inc. 1,618.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34372 HoeriNger Service, Inc. 47.78 Compressor Pans
34373 The Holman Group 710.00 Employee Assistance Program Premium
34374 Home Depot 297.64 Small Hardware
34375 Holey Equipment Company 722.16 Repair Hot Water Pressure Washer
34376 Hub Auto Supply 229.46 Truck Parts
34377 I. D. Industries, Inc. 27.99 Electrical Supplies
34378 Imaging Plus, Inc. 117.65 Printing Service
34379 Industrial Distribution Group 1.315.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34380 Industrial Metal Supply 857.86 Aluminum Pipe&Maintenance Material
34381 IBM Corp. 6.064.45 IBM ASI400 Lease
34382 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS/400 Upgrade
34383 J&B Auto Parts 92.36 Auto Parts&Supplies
34384 J&L Industrial Supply 107.14 Tools
34385 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 774.00 Instrument Supplies
34336 Jackbilt,Inc. 2,711.59 Sewer Service Fee Rebate
34387 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 5,990.86 Misc.Construction Services-Tunnel Covers,Vents,Gas Flaps
34368 Janke Lujan 1,152.50 Claim-Sewer Lateral Connection
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03/16/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34389 Jays Catering 1.501.29 Meeting Expenses
34390 Thermo Wesbonics 320.81 Thermal Chart Paper
34391 John Wiley&Sons,Inc. 118.39 Publication
34392 Johnstone Supply 253.23 Electrical Supplies
34393 JLM Contracting 14,061.79 Construction Service-Pipe Repair
34394 Karen Monaco&Associates 12.875.00 FIS Support Services
34395 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 768.50 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation
34396 Kelly Paper 76.70 Paper
34397 Lab Support 2.019.63 Temporary Employment Services
34398 Lee&Ro,Inc. 14.720.25 Engineering Consulting Services-P1.68&P2.39
34399 Lexis-Nexis 115.48 Books&Publications
34400 LmI ert Cassidy 188.50 Professional Service-Human Resources
34401 Gerald R.Jones 4,414.82 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99
34402 Long Beach Line-X 3,640.00 Truck Supplies-Fiberglass Track Lle Covers
34403 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2.582.30 Professional Services-Corrosion Study
34404 Memco International 709.50 Janitorial Supplies
34405 Mary Buenaventura 78.00 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34406 MarVac Electronics 9.57 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34407 Masune Company 17.55 Safety Supplies
34408 Matt Chler,Inc. 4,075.74 Valves
34409 The McCraw-Hill Companies 76.54 Publication
34410 McRay Industries,Inc. 513.59 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
34411 Media Clips,Inc. 172.80 Notices
34412 Micro Motion, Inc. $10.08 Electrical Pads If Supplies -
34413 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,492.75 Mechanical Pars&Supplies
34414 Mission Uniform Service 5.147.19 Uniform Rentals
34415 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental
34416 MoloPholo 83.36 Photographic Services
34417 MAP 1,500.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs
34418 MI Services Group,Inc. 500.00 Human Resources Tmining Registration
34419 National Plant Services.Inc. 3,825.00 Vacuum Truck Services
34420 National Technical Information Service 1.579.50 Publication
34421 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,169.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
34422 Norms Refrigeration 292.77 Electric Parts
34423 NST Network Support Team 2,571.63 Computer Server Consulting Services
34424 Office Depot Business Services Div. 423.43 Office Supplies
34425 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 6.896.26 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Bemchmarking Study
34426 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 362.81 Electrical Pans&Supplies
34427 Robert Dolan 555.20 Meeling7fraining Expense Reimbursement
34428 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 672.21 Pump Equipment
34429 Orange County Hose Company 53.86 Hose,Supplies&Repairs
34430 Orange County Winwater Works 65.78 Plumbing Supplies
34431 Ortiz Fire Protection 3.635.00 Service Agreement
34432 Oxygen Service Company 1,713.31 Specialty Gases
34433 OCB Reprographics 10.573.35 Printing Service-MO 1/26100
34434 Ol Analytical 558.73 Lab Supplies
Page 6 of 9 1e
Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03/15101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34435 P.L Hawn Company,Inc. 1.109.37 Electrical Supplies
34436 Pace-Butler Corp. 175.00 Printer Repair
34437 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3.591.08 Plumbing Supplies
34438 Pacific Pails and Controls, Inc. 819.20 Electrical Supplies
34439 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 11,117.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34440 Pagenel 2,555.24 Paging Services
34441 Warren D.Parchan 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34442 Parker Supply Company 4,564.46 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
34443 Parts Unlimited 379.67 Truck Supplies
34444 Reber Peterson 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34445 Petroleum Traders Corporation 14.596.60 Gasoline
34446 Barbara Pomykata 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34447 Hach c/o Penton Industries 13.991.39 Quick View Camera System-Source Control
34448 Power Design 9,669.75 Electrical Supplies
34449 Primary Source 229.15 Office Furniture
34450 Project Management Institute 170.15 Publication
34451 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 822.50 Mechanical Supplies
34452 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 155.00 Instrument Repair
34453 R.T.Corporation 138.00 Lab Supplies
34454 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.96 Trash Removal
34455 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7.940.78 Life Insurance Premium
34456 Relaon 2,789.16 Printing
34457 Revoo Technologies 556.08 Electrical Parrs&Supplies
34458 RPM Electric Motors 489.61 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34459 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 15.710.00 Construction -Manhole Repair
34460 Santa Ana Electric Motors 405.28 Motor
34461 Schwing America,Inc. 83.49 Pump Supplies
34462 City of Seal Beach 107.64 Water Use
34463 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 7,740.00 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
34464 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 257.18 Tools/Hardware
34465 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 410.03 Tools/Hardware
34466 Supelce,Inc. 952.40 Lab Supplies
34467 Dana Singer 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34468 SoflChoice 163.03 Software
34469 Southern California Edison 2,201.89 Power
34470 Karl Sperling 748.21 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34471 Stanley B.Grant,Ph.D 1.000.00 Professional Services-J-85(TAC)
34472 Michael Stone 830.38 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34473 Strata International,Inc, 1,110.92 Chemicals
34474 Sun International 296.37 Lab Supplies
34475 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,413.87 Mechanical Supplies
34476 SARBS-CWEA 50.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc.
34477 SPEC Services,Inc. 3,526.91 Engineering Services J-33-1
34478 Team,Inc. 1,277.10 Valves
34479 Tatra Tech,Inc. 16.746.78 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
34480 Textile Engineering Associates 8,713.15 Belt Press Supplies
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 03101101 to 03116101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34481 The Foxboro Company 1,823.78 Instrument Supplies
34482 The Orange County Register 3,300.30 Notices&Ads
34483 Thermo Forme 1.203.68 Lab Repairs&Maintenance
34484 Thomas Conveyor Company 5,881.40 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
34485 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 227.38 Biosolids Analysis
34486 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,111.88 Mechanical Supplies
34487 Tierra Tractor 355.00 Tres Planting Services
34488 Time Motion Tools 7.17 Freight Charges
34489 Dally Pilot 56.25 Notices&Ads
34490 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 2.650.00 Easement Weed Abatement
34491 TreMC Control Service,Inc 263.38 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
34492 Tran Consulting Engineers 13,425.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects-Pi-65
34493 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskesping MO 5-11-94
34494 Truce&Auto Supply,Inc. 239.13 Truck Supplies
34495 Turblex,Inc. 7.559.69 Repairs&Maintenance of Turblex Blovrers
34496 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,702.96 Lab Supplies
34497 Teksystems 6,140.00 Temporary Employment Services
34498 Ultra Scientific 1,026.95 Lab Supplies
34499 The Unisource Corporation 187.79 Office Supplies
34500 United Parcel Service 60.53 Parcel Services
34501 Industrial Air Compressor 407.67 Filters
34502 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,501.18 Plumbing Supplies
34503 Ronald Vander Macron 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34504 The Vantage Group,L.L.D. 17,654.00 Temporary Employment Service -
34505 Vema's Plumbing 237.50 Plumbing Equipment Service
346M Villa Ford 24,486.10 2001 Ford F-260 Truck
34507 Vision Service Plan(CA) 7,217.64 Vision Service Premium
34508 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,11SZ05 Lab Supplies
34509 The Wackenhut Corporation 1,066.50 Security Guards
34510 Donald Well 663.30 User Fee Refunds Re Septic Tanks
34511 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 16,666.07 Engineering Service J-67
34512 Waxle Sanitary Supply 223.94 Janitorial Supplies
34513 Western States Chemical,Inc. 5,879.99 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
34514 WEF 122.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation
34515 Xerox Corporation 16,952.35 Copier Leases
34616 Zumro,Inc. 2,507.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34517 Southern Contracting Company 23,919.00 Construction-J-33-1
34518 Union Bark of California 4,037.00 Construction P2-60,Retention
34519 Michael D.Moore 37.27 Mesting/fraining Expense Reimbursement
34520 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,606.00 Seyrer Service Fee Administration
34521 Dustin Balker&Guy Barker 74.0g Claim-Bicycle Damage
34522 City of Fountain Valley 1,865.00 Hazardous Materiels Disclosure Fee
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,580,306.46
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 03/01101 to 03/16101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlptlon
Payroll Disbursements,
22470-22596 Employee Paychecks $ 176,515.23 Biweekly Payroll 03107101
22597-22602 Interim Paychecks 1,398.57 Directors
58652.59107 Direct Deposit Statements 718,871.07 Biweekly Payroll 03/07/01
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 896.784.87
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas $ 97.711.80 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas 251,035.10 Febmary Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 345,746.90
Total Claims Paid 03/01/01 -03116101 $ 4,825,838.23
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Pavable-Warrants
34523 American Express $ 36.077.21 Purchasing Cam Program,Misc.Supplies&Services
34524 Orange County Sanitation District 442,496.83 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
34525 Southern California Edison 73.893.83 Power
34526 Airgas Safety 2.602.23 Safety Supplies
34527 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 202.67 Mechanical Supplies
34528 Association of Calif.Water Agencies 165.00 Communications Meeting Registration
34529 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 150.00 Permit Fee
34530 ASSE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 2,957-00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration
34531 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 385.91 Telephone Service
34532 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 173.49 Telephone Service
34533 Voided Check - -
34534 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment
34535 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
34536 BNI Building News 98.78 Publication
34537 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
34538 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 53.28 Electrical Supplies
34539 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 465.70 Plumbing Supplies
34540 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 131.00 Easement Fee-Contract 5-46
34541 CSMFO-GASB Update 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration-California Society of Municipal Finance Officers
34542 CW EA 2001 Annual Conference 1,445.00 O&M Meeting Registration-California Water Environment Association
34543 Donald Paul&Laura P.Dicker 1,063.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34544 Engineering News Record 99.00 Subscription
34545 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
34546 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
34547 Industrial Metal Supply 754.02 Metal
34548 Intl.Union of Oper Erg AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction
34549 Irvine Ranch Water District 31.56 Water Use
34550 James F.McConnell 1,625.00 Meeting7Training Expense Reimbursement
34551 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 312.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34552 Mellon Trust 18,581.82 Investment Custodian Bank
34553 William M.Moline 649.26 Check Reissue for Stale Dated Payroll Check
34554 Munoz Coin Laundry 556.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
34555 National Notary Association 59.00 Office Supplies
34556 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resod 1,822-98 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training
34557 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
34558 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,010.83 Plumbing Paris&Supplies
34559 OCEA 495A2 Dues Deduction
34560 Pacific Bell 1,134.02 Telephone Services
34561 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
34562 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
34563 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction
34564 SkillPath Seminars 399.00 Information Technology Training Registration
34565 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
34566 Thompson industrial Supply,Inc. 1,935.26 Mechanical Supplies
34567 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From 03116/01 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34568 Unocal 76 183.03 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38.1 Inspection
34569 Vedzon California 887.31 Telephone Services
34570 Layne T.Baroldi 155.96 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement
34571 Shabbir S.Basra! 423.58 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34672 Mark A.Esquer 789.48 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement
34573 Clarice M. Marcin 230.18 Meeling/Traming Expense Reimbursement
34574 Michael D.Moore 251.43 Meeting/lraining Expanse Reimbursement
34575 Samuel L.Mowbray 826.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34576 Mark S.Roberts 504,48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
34577 United Stales Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
34578 RPI/Bio Gro 219,502.13 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
34579 Black&Veatch Corporation 26,907.10 Professional Services-J-71.3
34560 Black&Veatch Corporation 69,852.57 Engineering Services Pi-76
34581 Brown&Caldwell 141,627.21 Engineering Services P1-37
34582 Caroib Engineers 73,727.33 Enti needng Services P2-66&J-39
34583 Computerized Facility Inlergmtion 34.507.95 Engineering Service J-25-1
34584 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 132,147.08 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95
34585 Lee&Ro, Inc. 45,421.99 Engineering Consulting Services 5.49,5-50.5.51 &5.52
34586 Municipal Water Dist,of Orange County 29,643.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99
34587 Orange County Water District 322,469.18 GW RS Cooperative Project
34588 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 555.607.38 Engineering Services J-42,J-3&1
34589 Synagro West,Inc. 163,353.16 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
34590 Reliaslar 54,801.98 Employee Medical Health Premium
34591 South Coast Environmental Co. 43,761.25 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
34592 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 80,722.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
34593 Woodru0,Spradlin&Smart 67.950.57 Legal Services MO 7-28-95
34694 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 61,380.00 Construction J-63
34595 Harbor Bay,Inc. 33.165.00 Cona truction J-60
34596 A-Plus Systems 254.60 Notices&Ads
34597 Acculite Fasteners,Inc 275.63 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
34598 AccuStandard,Inc. 1,473.40 Lab Supplies
34699 Advanced Sealing It Supply Co., Inc. 940.48 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
34600 Aearo Company 1,956.00 Safety Supplies
34601 Air Liquids America Corp. ISSAS Specialty Gasses
34602 Air Products&Chemicals 24,136.35 O If M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
34603 Airborne Express 65.35 Air Freight
34604 All American Asphalt 4,961.44 Paving
34605 American Digital Cartography,Inc. 3,050.00 Professional Services J-73-2
34606 Appleone Employment Service 4,878.30 Temporary Employment Services
34607 Aquem,Inc. 1.887.50 Temporary Employment Services
34608 Arcus Dale Security 254.00 OBslle Back-Up Tape Storage for NIT Server
34609 Argo Intemational Corporation 5.078.60 Electrical Parts It Supplies
34610 Ascelte Training Company 2,319.75 Information Technology Training Registration
34611 ASM International 1,665.00 O&M Training Registration
34612 ASM Press 53.45 Publication
34613 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 69.19 Telephone Service
v
Page 2 of
a ,
Claims Paid From 03/16/01 to 03/31/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34614 AWSI 500.00 Department of Transportation Training Program-Advanced Workplace Strategies
34615 8&B Electronics 117.41 Lab Paris&Supplies
34616 Battery Specialties 465.43 Batteries
34617 BluMedeux Vilek,Inc. 648.76 Lab Supplies
34618 Blair-Martin Co.,Inc. 406.96 Valve Manifolds
34619 Boyle Engineering Corporation 24,765.27 Engineering Services 1.24,2.31 &2.50
34620 Burke engineering Co. 328.60 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34621 Callrol,Inc. 361.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34622 Cambridge Isotope Labs 660.87 Lab Supplies
34623 Cad R.Nelson,P.E. 3,280.00 Engineering Consultant 2.41
34624 Carollo Engineers 102.50 Engineering Services-IMANS Testing
34625 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 23.377.50 Engineering Services P2.82
34626 Chapman University 7,500.00 Leadership Training Fees
34627 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,279.23 Copier Lease
34628 City of Costa Mesa 19,305.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation
346M City of Fountain Valley 12.901.68 Water Use
34630 Compaq Computer Corporation 1,730.75 Computer Supplies
34631 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9.862.50 Computer Malm.Agreement
34632 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,225.33 Electrical Supplies
34633 Contemporary Controls 455.62 Electrical Supplies
34034 Converse Consultants 638.50 Consulting Services P2-60
34835 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training
34636 Corporate Express 973.51 Office Supplies
34637 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
34638 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc 52.17 Mechamcal Parts&Supplies
34639 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.779.72 Electrical Pans&Supplies
34640 Crane America Services,Inc. 2.500.00 Crane Services
34641 CASA 450.00 Tech.Services&Environmental Compl.&Monitoring Meetirgrtraining Registration
34642 CCP Industries 2,723.71 Janitorial Supplies
34643 Kelly Christensen-CHMIA Cont Reg. 200.00 Meelingrtraining Expense Reimbursement
34644 CH2MHi11 17,943.04 Engineering Service J-71-4
34645 CH2MHi11 1,905.46 Engineering Services J-403
34646 California Pipeline Inspection 662.95 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3-38-1
34647 CWFA 2001 Annual Conference 55.00 Source Control Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34648 CWEA Membership 204.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34649 Del Mar Analytical 1,953.00 Biosolids Analysis
34650 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWest 428.80 Valves
34651 Diamond H Recognition 229.17 Employee Service Awards
34652 Dionex Corporation 925.00 Lab Maintenance
34653 Dubois Towing 281.00 Towing
34654 DOB Engineering,Inc. 4,260.00 Temporary Employment Services
34655 DGA Consultants,Inc. 288.00 Surveying Services MO 63-94
34656 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 5,844.30 Electrical Supplies
34657 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 563.00 Medical Screening
34658 Electra-Bond 698.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34659 Electrical Systems Engineering Co. 7,362.00 Testing Contract J-33.1
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34660 Enchanter,Inc. 600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
34661 Environmental Resource Assoclation/ERA 1,473.90 Lab Supplies
34662 Exterminstics of Southern California 1,680.00 Exterminator Services
34663 EC Construction Co. 1,074.00 Manhole Repairs If Maintenance
34664 FedEx Corporation 35.16 Air Freight
34665 Allied Supply Company 3.258.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34666 CSC/Fibenron 475.19 Fiber Optic Cable
34667 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,224.46 Lab Supplies
34668 Flo-Systems,Inc. 4,314.16 Pump Supplies
34669 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 20,348.63 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium
34670 Fountain Valley Camera 31.72 Photo Supplies
34671 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 175.99 Truck Wash Tickets
34672 Franklin Covey 154.59 Office Supplies
34673 FMs Electronics 659.82 Computer Supplies
34674 City of Fullerton 138.26 Water Use
34675 Ganshl Lumber Company 733.46 Lumber/Hardware
34676 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 0,646.45 Bell Filter Press Supplies
34677 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,989.24 Electrical Pans&Supplies
34678 Graybar 3,829.10 Electrical Supplies
34679 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 59.25 Lab Parts If Supplies
34680 Hasker Equipment Company 17,238.35 Truck Supplies&Repairs
34681 Hach rJo Ponton Industries 1,250.55 Lab Supplies
34682 Harbour Engineering Group 5.353.50 Pump Supplies
34683 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 937.64 Plumbing Supplies
34684 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 1,893.19 Engine Generator Control Supplies&Repairs
34685 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 08.00 Meeting Expenses
34686 Hoerblger Service, Inc. 675.80 Compressor Pans
34687 The Holman Group 708.58 Employee Assistance Program Premium
34688 Home Depot 191.78 Small Hardware
34689 City of Huntington Beach 16,237.36 Water Use
34690 Huntington Supply Co.,Inc. 79.28 Hardware
34691 I.D.Industries,Inc. 261,84 Electrical Supplies
34692 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,413.94 Printing Service
34693 Industrial Distribution Group 2,201.38 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
34694 Industrial Metal Supply 130.88 Metal
34695 Industrial Plastic Supply,Inc. 788.10 Plastic
34696 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 93.31 Lab Supplies
34697 Inside EPA 300.00 Publication
34698 Irvine Ranch Water District 19.74 Water Use
34699 law, Inc. $28.75 Lab Supplies
34700 J&L Industrial Supply 239.44 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34701 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 264.21 Lab Pans&Supplies
34702 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 14,342.56 Misc.Conatrucllon Services-Irrigation Valve Work
34703 Jays Catering 745.25 Meeting Expenses
34704 John's Frilly Grille 387.80 Engineering Meeting Expenses-J-35-2
34705 Johnstone Supply 249.19 Electrical Supplies
a
Page 4 of 8
er �
Claims Paid From 03/16104 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34708 K.H.Watts Co. 487.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34707 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,937.50 FIS Support Services
34705 Kerry Consulting Group 64.61 Professional Services MO 11-15-95
34709 Knott Laboratory,Inc. 2.190.00 Professional Services-Claim of Than vs. Kovacs
34710 Lab Safely Supply,Inc. 100.90 Safety Supplies
34711 Lab Support 642.00 Temporary Employment Services
34712 Law Journal Press 70.85 Publication
34713 Law Offices of Kinkle, Rodiger&Spriggs 1.676.90 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
34714 Lexis-Nexis 455.82 Publication
34715 Gerald R.Jones 7,683.85 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
34716 Line-X Protective Coatings 342.00 Protective Coaling for V471
34717 Uniform Center 9,013.88 Uniforms
34718 Luccl's 80.50 Meeting Expense
34719 Lustre-Cal 3,092.85 Reflective Vehicle Decals
34720 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 099.85 Professional Services-Corrosion Study
34721 Maintenance Technology Corp. 519.74 Mechanical Supplies
34722 Mantek 334.02 Custodial Equipment/Supplies;
34723 MarVac Electronics 186.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34724 Mc Junkln Corporation 339.44 Plumbing Supplies
34725 The McGraw-Hill Companies 157.01 Publication
34726 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.408.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34727 McMillan Design,Inc. 729.18 Lob Parts&Supplies
34728 Mec Analytical System 15,153.40 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis
34729 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 966.10 Mechanical Repairs
34730 Medlin Controls Co. 2,770.84 Instrument Supplies
34731 Metal Supply,Inc. 288.10 Metal
34732 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study
34733 Michael's Stores.Inc. 488.48 Photo Supplies&Services
34734 Mid-Weal Associates 22.831.19 SHP TR Muncher&Mechanical Pans&Supplies
34735 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 1,995.D0 Mechanical Repairs
34736 Mission Uniform Service 4,288.27 Uniform Rentals
34737 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental
34738 Morton Salt 533.07 Salt
34739 National Institute of Bids&Technology 1,127.DD Lab Supplies
34740 National Micmcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
34741 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,580.00 Vacuum Truck Services
34742 Neal Supply Co. 3,901.46 Plumbing Supplies
34743 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1,445.06 Security System Maintenance
34744 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Construction Management Training Registration
34745 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resat 974.90 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training
34746 Nlckey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,042.55 LubricanttDiesel Fuel
34747 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,357.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
34748 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service
34749 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,751.20 Lab Services
34750 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 665.00 Lab Services
34751 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,049.29 Office Supplies
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 03116101 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34752 O C Wholesale Electric 67.08 Electrical Supplies
34753 Optio Software 5,505.00 Computer Hardware/Software,Maintenance
34754 Orange County Tan Collector 2,874.64 2ral Installment Property Taxes for 810 E.Balboa Blvd.,Newport Beach
34755 Orange County Winwaler Works 337.10 Plumbing Supplies
34756 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,853.04 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
34757 Oxygen Service Company 2,964.79 Specially Gases
34758 OCB Reprographics 7.58 Priming Service-MO 1/26/00
34759 OCE-USA,Inc. 372.95 Computer Equipment Mainl.
34760 OI Analytical 199.83 Lab Supplies
34761 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 5,879.78 Air Conditioner Fillers,Parts&Repairs
34762 Pacific Bell 23.73 Telephone Services
34763 Padfic Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
34764 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3.758.47 Plumbing Supplies
34765 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 902.80 Electrical Supplies
34766 Parker Supply Company 4,183.41 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
34767 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 16,763.22 Construction-Sewer Repair
34768 Petroleum Traders Corporation 14,570.89 Gasoline
34769 Plan Sak 59.43 Stationery&Office Supplies
34770 Polydyne,Inc. 4.209.59 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
34771 Postmaster 750.00 Post Office Box Rental
34772 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.50 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium
34773 Pulsafesder,Im. 413.96 Freight Charges
34774 Pump Engineering&/or Q Air 1,835.73 Compressor Oil&Supplies
34775 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
34776 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services
347T7 R.M.Young Company 2,138.09 Lab Parts&Supplies
34778 Randolph Austin Co. 620.00 Plumbing Supplies
34779 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 22,178.55 Pumps-Digester
34780 Rote Rooter-N.O.C.#11 135.00 Sewer Line Repair&Maintenance
34781 Rulan&Tucker L.L.P. 6,300.46 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
34782 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 990.00 Engineering Services-Repair Warehouse Roof at Plant 1
34783 RPM Electric Motors 4,185.95 Pump Repairs
34784 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 16,402.50 Construction -Manhole Repair
34785 Sdmvirg America,ix. 108.55 Pump Supplies
34786 Sears Industrial Sales 32.81 Mechanical Supplies
34787 Saavenlures 2,850.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
34788 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,060.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34789 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 74.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34790 Supelco,Inc. S03.79 Lab Supplies
34791 Smaman Supply Company/Orange Coast 22.10 Plumbing Supplies
34792 SoftView Computer Products 549.28 Ergonomic Office Equipment
34793 SoftChdce 7,809.13 Software
34794 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 224.74 Permit Fees
34795 Southern California Edison 28.37 Power
34796 Southern California Water Company 670.00 Refund Permit Fee
34797 Sparklelts 1,795.15 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
e
Page 6 of 8
Claims Paid From 03/16101 to 03/31101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34798 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 3,574.25 Instrument Supplies
34799 $pax Cedprep,Inc. 43.41 Lab Supplies
34800 State Chemical Mfg,Co. 120.82 Janitorial Supplies
34801 Sunset Industrial Parts 3,678.24 Mechanical Supplies
34802 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 2,298.00 Lab Analytical Service
34803 Telog Instruments,Inc. 1,257.10 Electrical Pens 8 Supplies
34804 Textile Engineering Associates 4,021.58 Mechanical Paris S Supplies
34805 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 7.674.96 Motors
34806 Time Warner Communicallons 40.47 Cable Services
34807 Total News Tracking 70.50 OCN News Clip-03/05/01 at 6:00 p.m.
34808 Trade Service Corporation 2,063.36 Software Maint.
34809 Tren Consulting Engineers 21,630.00 Engineering Services 546
34810 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. 1,610.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94
34811 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,395.00 Lab Services
34812 Teksystems 2,340.00 Temporary Employment Services
34813 TRW EMC/Calibration Services 4,525.00 Instrument Maintenance
34814 The Unisource Corporation 661.13 OBice Supplies
34815 United Parcel Service 645.31 Parcel Services
34816 Unocal 76 60.91 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38.1 Inspection
34817 USFlller Westates Carbon 414.50 Hazardous Waste Disposal
34818 Valley Cities Supply Company 673.07 Plumbing Supplies
34819 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 6,299.50 Generators
34820 Varian Instrument Group 977.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
34821 Vedtect 2.895.00 Software Support 8 Maintenance
34822 Vedzon California 130.26 Telephone Services
34823 Veme's Plumbing 1,324.99 Plumbing Equipment Service
34624 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.232.40 Vision Service Premium
34825 Vortex Industries,Ina 3,072.77 Door Repair
34826 Vulcan 20.989.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
34827 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 5,557.18 Lab Supplies
34828 The Wackenhut Corporation 3.199.50 Security Guards
34829 Water Environment Federation 138.00 Membership
34830 Waxie Sanitary Supply 852.21 Janitorial Supplies
34831 West Group 251.00 Subscription
34832 Western Sandblasting Company 600.00 Sandblasting
34833 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 7.232.81 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95
34834 WEF 204.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation
34835 Xerox Corporation 10,062.94 Copier 8 FAX Leases 8 Supplies
34835 The Yakima Company 19,112.23 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
34537 York International 173.72 Electrical Supplies
34838 3T Equipment Company 4.035.70 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
34839 Robert M.Bell 221.22 Mealing?raining Expense Reimbursement
34840 Kimberly C.Christensen 1,035.72 Mesting?reining Expense Reimbursement
34841 CWEA 2001 Annual Conference 100.00 Source Control Training Registration-Calif.Water Environment Association
34842 Norma C.Leopando 1,687.49 Meeting/7relnin9 Expense Reimbursement
34843 Michael D.Moore 543.01 Meelin9/7reining Expense Reimbursement
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 03/16/01 to 03131101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34844 Mark A.Tomko 351.69 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement
34845 Michael I.Zedek 474.53 Meetingri-mining Expense Reimbursement
34846 Margate Construction,Inc. 9,540.00 Construction,Retention-Extension of Reclaimed Water Line
34847 Orange County Sanitation District 1,450.36 Petty Cash Reimb.
34848 Montgomery Watson 6,707.92 Professional Services-2.21-1
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,533,311.57
Payroll Disbursements
22603-22721 Employee Paychecks $ 163.873.60 Biweekly Payroll 03/21/01
22722-22722 Interim Paycheck 10,207.20 Termination Paycheck
22723-22723 Interim Paycheck 103.96 Director
22724-22725 Interim Paychecks 31,442.07 Termination Paychecks
59108-59559 Direct Deposit Statements 735,956.90 biweekly Payroll 03121/01
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 941,683.73
Wire Transfer Payments
Slate Street Bank 8 Trost Co.of CA $ 538.973.58 March Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation
Total Wine Transfer Payments $ 538,973.58
Total Claims Paid 03116101 to 03131/00 $ 5.013.868.88
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To%cr .Dir.
o51z3io1
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
7
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary
SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board
Meeting)
SUMMARY
As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at
the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June
meeting.
Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular
meeting.
For new Directors' information, we have included,below an excerpt from the current
Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of
the Joint Administrative Organization.
"G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A
Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of
Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1st.
The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of
each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications
for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board
of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting.
The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular
Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the
election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st.
The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority
of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to
resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the
Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall
continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by
action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson
becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election
of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board
O:".dWu9nftu1.N NpmdR R 1.1W01 eam n d.R.WR>N5IMM 1.d.
Rv md. MOM Page 1
meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term
unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors.
Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the
Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms
for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson."
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
G:1vy dlebBedelBoard A,,nE Rep 11=018-1d Alvdn R.P.,W%1111em 7 Ea[
RBxS¢d: W20.9 Page 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date TUBG.or Dir.
05/23/O1
AGENDA REPORT em Number I[em Number
9
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECIA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 04/01/01 - 04/15/01 and 04/16/01 - 04/30/01
G],addagend.rewrd Aoanda ReWBUOOt Beard Agenda ReWStl Wtrlrenn B.dad
w.ew Mo.. Page 1
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Pavable-Wam mta
34849 City of Newport Beach $ 38,690.00 Cooperative Project-541-1
34850 Orange County Sanitation District 464,577.57 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
34851 PaineWebber Incorporated 40,387.98 COP Remarketing Agreement
34852 Southern California Edison 59,484.02 Power
34853 Alrgas Safety 1.224.02 Safety Supplies
34854 Albertson's 6,325.70 Refund Connection Fee
34855 American Airlines 1.920.00 Travel Services
34856 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 2,241.05 Long Distance Telephone Service
34857 AT 8 T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,781.82 Cellular Telephone Service
34858 Battelle 300.00 Laboratory Meeting Registration
34859 Bell Pipe S Supply Co. 352.68 Piping Supplies
3480D Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment
34861 Boeing Corporation-Semiconductor 18,386.44 Reconciliation User Fee Program
34862 Court Order 20D.00 Wage Garnishment
34863 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
34864 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2.720.47 Electrical Supplies
34865 CEM Corporation 602.85 Lab Maintenance
34866 CWEA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34887 CWEA-TCP 25.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
34868 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
34869 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
34870 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
34871 Gail Rubio 2.528.63 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34872 Gilbert Ayala 195.00 Connection Fee Refund
34873 Industnal Metal Supply 122.48 Metal
34874 Intl.Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction
34675 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use
34876 IBM Corporation 1,830.00 Year 2000 Testing
34877 John Wiley 8 Sons.Inc. 433.82 Publication
34878 JohNs Philly Grille 157.11 Planning/Design/Engineering Meeting Expense-J-42
34879 Jonathan Manufacturing Corp. 1,801.90 Reconciliation User Fee Program
34880 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 165.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies
34881 League of California Cities 1,000.00 Sponsorship
34882 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 208.85 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies
34883 MI Services Group,Inc. 1.500.00 Construction Management Training Registration
34884 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 2,490.00 Construction Management Training Registration
34885 NAGDCA 90.00 Human Res.Meeting Registration-Nal'I.Assoc.of Gov.Defined Contribution Adm.
34886 Orange County Marshal 10D.00 Wage Garnishment
34887 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 321.91 Fittings
34888 OCEA 485.87 Dues Deduction
34889 Pacl0c Parts and Controls, Inc. 956.63 Electrical Supplies
34890 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
34891 Parker Hannifin Corporation 342.68 Mechanical Supplies
34892 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
34893 Patriot Video Productions 410.80 Video Taping Services
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34894 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction
34895 Project Adventure,Inc. 373.80 Safety&Emergency Response Site Evaluation for Training
34896 Robert F.Driver Assoc., Inc. 2,799.00 Commercial Crime Insurance
34897 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 33.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34898 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment
34899 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3.188.20 Mechanical Supplies
34900 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
34901 University of Southern California 11.87 Publication
34902 Verizon California 733.42 Telephone Services
34903 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 283.54 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
34904 Mike J.Herrera 100.00 Meoling/Training Expense Reimbursement
34905 James C.Mullins 244.79 Reimbursement for Certified Mailings J-33-1
34906 Robert Dolan 762.56 Meeting7rrainirg Expense Reimbursement
34907 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 855.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration
34908 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 50.435.53 Engineering Services J-73-2
34909 AKM Consulting Engineers 75,361.52 Engineering Services 7-36,7-39,741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements
34910 Black&Veatch Corporation 136,652.94 Engineering Services J-77
34911 Boyle Engineering Corporation 34,356.00 Engineering Services 1.2.4
34912 Camillo Engineers 74.619.99 Engineering Services P2.60&P2-66
34913 City of Santa An 55,992.00 Cooperative Projects Program J-73
34914 Cooper Energy Systems 46.657.50 Repair&Testing of Turbo Charger
34915 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 55,819.07 Misc.Construction Service 2-37&Irrigation Valve Replacement Project
34916 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 27,967.21 Medical Insurance Premium
34917 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 168,405.37 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
34918 Lee&Ro.Inc. 28.055.30 Engineering Consutiing Services 5.49,5-50.5.51,5.52&J47
34919 Mladen Burtich Construction Company 90,000.00 Construction-Emergency Repair W 244nch Force Main
34920 Orange County Water District 108,866.07 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
34921 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 129.207.11 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95
34922 Polydyne.Inc. 35,649.13 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
34923 Primary Source 64,197.19 Ofce/Lunch Roan Furniture
34924 Projects Partners 26,363.09 Temporary Employment Services
34925 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 97,654.30 Pumps
34926 Science Applications IMI.,Corp. 245,884.41 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-04
34927 Tran Consulting Engineers 53,655.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 1.17,7.21 &1-2.4
34928 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 87,763.14 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
34929 Western Slates Chemical,Inc. 39,679.28 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95
34930 Ark Construction Company 27,090.00 Construction-Enclose Open Bay at Pit. 1 Warehouse Storage Area
34931 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 110.408.58 Construction 3.38.1
34932 J W Contracting Corporation 254,713.00 Construction P2-60
34933 Margate Construction, Inc. 255,117.00 Construction J-71.2
34934 Southern Contracting Company 29,855.25 Construction P2-47-1
34935 Union Bank of California 28,302.00 Construction,Retention P2-60
34936 A.B,I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 109.03 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
34937 A-Plus Systems 1.442.70 Notices&Ads
34938 AccWtie Fasteners,Inc. 35.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
34939 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 3.292.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
a +
Page 2 Of 9
Claims Paid From 0410'1101 to 04115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34940 Advanced Technology Service 4,770.25 Ins.Pens&Supplies
34941 Air Cold Supply 45.44 Air Conditioner Supplies
34942 Air Liquids America Corp. 865.38 Specially Gasses
34943 Air Products&Chemicals 6.16 lab Supplies
34944 Airborne Express 125.83 Air Freight
34945 Airgas Safely 3,002.76 Safety Supplies
34946 Alden's Carpet&Drapes 1,801.42 Flooring for Board Secretary's Vault
34947 Beatrice E.Anderson 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34948 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 675.00 Service Agreement-Past Control
34949 Appleone Employment Service 1,176.45 Temporary Employment Services
34950 Aquent,Inc. 4,200.00 Temporary Employment Services
34951 Ark Construction Company 3,450.00 Construction-Floor Concrete Repair
34952 Artistic Blinds 283.00 Mini Blinds&Installa0on
34953 William C. F.Au 483.46 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34954 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 474.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies
34955 ABB Automation,Inc. 356.76 Instrument Service Malnt.
34956 ASS Group,Inc. 61.00 Publication
34957 American Air Filler International 1,343.75 Filler
34956 ABBE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 870.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration
34959 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 35.69 Telephone Service
34960 AWSI 166.DD Department of Transportation Training Program
34961 Battery Specialties 348.30 Batteries
34962 Dane Binlorn 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34963 BloMerieux Vilek,Inc. 624.59 Lab Supplies
34964 Borthwlck,Guy,Betlenhausen 13,112.29 Professional Services P2-84
34966 Curtis Brandt 483A5 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34966 Curds G.&Karen Brandt 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34967 Brenner-Fledler&Assoc, Inc. 1,006.58 Compressor
34968 Brett F.Sanders,Ph.D 500.00 Professional Services J-85-TAC
34969 Lloyd D.Brumbaugh 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34970 Burke Engineering Co. 985.78 Ins.Pads&Supplies
34971 Cal-Glass,Inc. 262.09 Lab Equipment Service
34972 California Auto Collision 690.52 Fender Repair on V434
34973 California Relocation Services, Inc. 151.88 Office Moving Services
34974 Carolyn Callaway 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34975 Callrol,Inc. 2,998.04 Ins.Parts&Supplies
34976 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 16,548.86 Engineering Services-Sewer Mapping
34977 Mary K.Campbell 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
34978 Capital Westward 219.81 Freight Charges
34979 Carl Warren&Co. 1,314.27 Insurance Claims Administrator
34980 Carollo Engineers 273.00 Engineering Services J-66
34981 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 17,410.23 Engineering Services P2-82
34982 Clayton Controls 105.63 Electrical Pans&Supplies
34983 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 1.472.83 O61ce Supplies
34984 Compressor Components Of California 2.737.49 Compressor Supplies
34985 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 68.22 Computer Malnt.Agreement
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
34986 Computers America,Inc. 272.12 Color Printer Cartridge
34987 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 601.39 Electrical Supplies
34988 Continental Laboratory Products.Inc. 3,521.20 Lob Supplies
34989 Converse Consultants 4,991.00 Consulting Service 11-20
34990 Cooper Energy Services 474.65 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
34991 Corporate Express Imaging 421.94 Computer Supplies
34992 Corporate Express 3,863.35 Office Supplies
34993 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899419
34994 Coat Containment Solutions 1,543.37 Worker's Comp.Services
34995 County Wholesale Electric Co. 11,590.56 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
34996 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Son Water Service
34997 Cummins Cal Pacific,Inc. 1,488.19 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
34998 CA Emissions Program 23.40 Vehicle Smog Testing
34999 CA-NV Section,AW WA 225.00 Mechanical Maintenance Meeting Registration
35000 CASA 1,125.00 Administration Meeting Registration
36001 CEM Corporation 957.01 Lob Supplies
35002 CPI-California Pipeline Inspection 3.562.00 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3.38-1
35003 CR 8 R,Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals
35004 CRC Press, Inc. 188.47 Publication
35005 CRO Marine Laboratories,Inc. 792.00 Lab Analysis
35006 Computational Systems,Inc. (CS0 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service
35007 Del Mar Analytical 2.070.00 Blosolkls Analysis
35006 DeZunk do Misco/SouthWesl 948.15 Valves
35009 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 597.09 Computer Software/Supplies
35010 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 209.96 Paint Supplies
35011 DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,312.00 Surveying Services MO 68-94
35012 ABB Automation,Inc. 3,266.53 Instrument Maml.
35013 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 115.59 Electrical Supplies
35014 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 195.00 Medical Screening
35015 Electra-Bond 994.38 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies
35010 Kevin 8 Joan Eisen 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35017 Employment Development Dept. 35.08 Stale Unemployment Tax
35018 Enchanter, Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-2445
35019 Environmental Resource Associates 1.732.70 Lab Supplies
35020 Charlie Evans 458.73 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35021 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. 588.25 Malnl.Service Agreement
35022 FedEx Corporation 389.23 Air Freight
35023 First American Real Estate Solutions 275.00 Orange County Property Information
35024 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,099.61 Lab Supplies
35025 Fleetcommunily,Inc. 100.00 Publication
35026 Flo-Systems,Inc. 5,149.25 Pump Supplies
35027 Forestry Suppliers 248.79 Ins.Parts 8 Supplies
35026 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company 20,279.28 Long-Term Disability Ins,Premium
35029 Fountain Valley Camera 66.37 Photo Supplies
35030 Fountain Valley Regional Hospital 82.62 Emergency Room Services
35n31 Franklin Covey 675.88 Office Supplies
Page 4 of 9
a, r
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35032 Fry's Electronics 702.04 Computer Supplies
35033 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 323.71 Bee Filter Press Supplies
35034 WIN Grainger,Inc. 670.58 Electrical Pans&Supplies
35035 Graybar 2,784.32 Computer Software/Hardware Supplies
35036 Hach rJo Penton Industries 3,453.72 Lab Supplies
35037 Ron&Marilyn Harder 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35038 Judith A.Hemphill 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35039 Hcerbiger Service, Inc. 5,646.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
35040 Home Depot 1,194.76 Small Hardware
35041 Jack Hom 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35042 Hub Auto Supply 434R9 Truck Parts
35043 Hunts'Final Phase 1,970.00 Misc.Repairs(Maintenance Services
35044 Hydraulic Controls, Inc. 136,00 Mechanical Paris&Supplies
35045 Impulse 60.75 Repairs&Malnt.Services
35D46 Industrial Distribution Group 3,116.56 Tools&Misc.Supplies
35047 Inteq Group 3,496.50 Information Technology Training Registration
35048 Ionics Instrument Business Group 2,764.89 Lab Supplies
35049 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS1400 Upgrade
35050 Information Management Resources(IMRI) 2,250.00 Professlonal Services-Software Consultant
35051 IONIA,Inc. 238.95 Publication
35052 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 7,583.16 Instrument Supplies
35053 Jay's Catering 1,196.24 Meeting Expenses
35054 John and Susan Millar 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35D55 John's Phllly Grille 504.24 Training Expenses-J-42
35056 FormsTronlesRlchalds Capital Corporation 1,062.50 Business Forms-Checks
35057 Nell W.&Pamela C. Kam 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35D58 Karen Monaco&Associates 6,375.00 FIS Support Services
35059 Kensington Electronics 476.81 Electrical Supplies
35060 Kathleen Kotl 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35061 Dennis Kretschmer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35062 Kronos,Inc. 3,750.00 Timekeeping Software,Training&Maintenance
35063 Lab Support 1,284.00 Temporary Employment Services
35064 William H.Lang 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septc Tanks
35065 La Molls Chemical Products 343.95 Chemicals
35066 Steven D.Lewis 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35067 Gerald R.Jones 5,146.55 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22.99
35068 Luod's 95.00 Meeting Expense
35069 Raymond Maggi 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
36070 Maintenance Technology Corp. 509.15 Mechanical Supplies
35071 Mark R.Mangold 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35072 Michael Manzano 483A5 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35073 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontado Branch 222.33 Plumbing Supplies
35074 McCromeler,Inc. 617.25 Repairs&Maint.Services
35075 Leota H.McGill 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35076 The McGraw-Hill Companies 143.34 Publication
35077 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,493.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
Page 5 of 9
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04/15/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35078 Mec Analytical System 2,067.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis
35079 Medlin Controls Co. 534.43 Instrument Supplies
35000 Raymond Mew 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35081 Jessie C.Meyers 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35082 Michael's Stores,Inc. 93.46 Office Supplies
35083 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13.595.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35084 Mission Uniform Service 4,864.46 Uniform Rentals
35085 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental
35086 Montgomery Watson 13,838.83 Professional Services-2-21-1
35087 Charlene Morley 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35088 National Microcamp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
35089 National Plant Services,Inc. 9,316.50 CCTV Sewer Line Inspection&Vacuum Services
35090 Neal Supply Co. 261.01 Plumbing Supplies
35091 Audrey Needham 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35092 Network Generations,Inc. 7,256.25 Computer So0ware/Hardware
35093 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1,338.02 Security System Maintenance
35094 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 Purchasing Training Registration
35095 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.843.65 Professional Services J-66&3-38-1
35096 Office Depot Business Services Div. 4,076.26 Once Supplies
35097 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 1,877.50 Contract Service -MukiAgency Benchmarking Study
35098 Cason Construction,Inc. 17,527.00 Construction P7-59
35099 OneSm ce Distributors.Inc. 696.61 Electrical Pans&Supplies
35100 Orange County Hose Company 366.53 Hydraulic Hose,Supplies&Repairs
35101 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1,412.76 Lab Parts&Supplies
35102 Oxygen Service Company 1,848.27 Specialty Gases
35103 OCB Reprographics 14,992.08 Printing Service-MO 1126100
35104 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 747.23 Electrical Supplies
35105 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
35106 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,647.00 Plumbing Supplies
35107 Pacific Pans&Controls 3,173.57 Electrical Supplies
35108 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 11.52 Freight Charges
35109 Pagenet 2,393.20 Paging Services
35110 Emilia Palacios 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35111 Parker Hannifin Corporation 51.60 Mechanical Supplies
35112 Parts Unlimited 404.75 Truck Supplies
35113 Patriot Video Productions 29.83 Video
35114 Paveway 6,212.00 Asphalt
35115 Peak Technologies 331.05 Lab Supplies
35116 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,237.50 Repairs&Maint.Services
35117 Petroleum Traders Corporation 15.358.04 Gasoline
35118 William B.&Nancy K.Pfeifer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35119 Bradley K.&Patricia A.PreiBer 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35120 Pod Supply 396.52 Safety Supplies
35121 Power Electro Supply Co.,Inc. 746.44 Electrical Supplies
35122 Pre-Paid Legal Services.Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium
35123 Precision Industries 536.95 Mechanical Supplies
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 04101101 to 04115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35124 Pyramid Fence Company, Inc. 1,904.70 Fencing Installation
35125 PC Connection,Inc. 212.00 Computer Supplies
35126 FIFE Interna8onal,Inc. 24,636.86 Intellitouch Complete Mail Center Manager&Maint.
35127 Quality Building Supply 210.05 Landscaping Supplies
35128 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
35129 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,230.53 Trash Removal
35130 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 499.38 Lab Supplies
35131 Reliestar 8.414.75 Employee Medical Health Premium
35132 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,898.60 Life Insurance Premium
35133 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 243.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35134 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer Dist. 5.000.00 Construction-Manhole Inundation Investigation Cooperative Projects
35135 RJN Group,Inc. 5,387.50 CMMS Consulting Services
35136 Safety Info,Inc. 195.OD Publication
35137 Richard&Nancy Schnell 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35138 Schwirg America,Inc. 201.65 Freight Charges
35139 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 48.76 Specially Gases
35M Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 7,536.00 Ins.Pans&Supplies
$5141 Sears Industrial Sales 746.33 Mechanical Supplies
35142 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 11.509.50 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
35143 James Sellers 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35144 Sensotec,Inc. 534.96 Electrical Supplies
35145 Mrs.Doris C.Shelly 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35146 Shureiuck Sales&Engineering 895.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35147 Donald J.Simmons 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35148 . Sloan Electric Company 9,260.89 Generator Repairs
35149 So.Cal.Gas Company 2.003.43 Natural Gas
35150 Soco-Lynch Corp. 802.58 Janitorial Supplies
35151 Southern California Edison 2,344.84 Power
35152 Sperling Inat.C/O Patten Corporate 2.941.21 Electrical Pans&Supplies
35153 Stanley B.Grant,Ph.D 1,000.00 Professional Services J-85
35154 John D.Stephens 1,422.08 Employee Computer Loan Program
35155 Kenneth S1lchler 561.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35156 Sunset Ford 9SA4 Vehicle Supplies
35157 Sunset Industrial Pans 2,036.93 Mechanical Supplies
35158 Super Power Products 387.00 Janitorial Supplies
35159 SCP Science 766.00 Lab Supplies
35160 SKC-West, Inc. 49.00 Safely&Emergency Response Meeting Registration
35161 Team,Inc. 6,256.50 Valves
35162 Telog Instruments,Inc. 44.50 Electrical Pans&Supplies
35163 Tetra Tech, Inc. 4.687.91 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
35164 The Foxboro Company 2,204.75 Instrument Supplies
35165 The Orange County Register 1,122.90 Notices&Ads
35166 ThermoOuest Corporation 18,503.16 Lab Supplies
35167 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 450.00 Biosolids Analysis
35168 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 15,444.71 Mechanical Supplies
35169 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 4,960.00 Elevator Maintenance
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 04101101 to 04115101
Warrant No. Vander Amount Description
35170 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
35171 Daily Pilot 425.00 Notices&Ads
35172 Toshiba International Corporation 4,374.65 Computer-Toshiba 1400 XL
35173 Total Air Analysis, Inc. 400.00 Lab Testing Service
36174 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 263.38 Tragic Safety Equipment Rental
35175 The Trans Company 208.39 Electrical Equipment Service Contract
35176 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
35177 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 467.73 Truck Supplies
35178 Tmesdall Laboratories,Inc. 40.00 Lab Services
35179 TCH Associates,Inc. 557.06 Lab Supplies
35180 Teksystems 3.960.00 Temporary Employment Services
35181 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Lab Service Agreement-Water Purification System
35182 Ultra Scientific 308.60 Lab Supplies
35183 The Unisoume Corporation 5,161.23 Office Supplies
35184 United Asset Coverage,Inc. 20.727.05 Phone System Meint.
35185 United Parcel Service 34,85 Parcel Services
35186 US Rental,Inc. 1.084.26 Dump Truck Rental
35187 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.753.73 Plumbing Supplies
35188 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 27.64 Mechanical Supplies
35189 Edward Van Vital 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35190 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,200.00 Temporary Employment Service
35191 Vapex.Inc. 968.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35192 Mike Varanelli 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35193 Varian Instrument Group 4,143.81 Lab Parts&Supplies
35194 Vedzon California 2,555.42 Telephone Services
35195 Verne's Plumbing 3.632.50 Plumbing Equipment Service
35196 Robert and Tracy Voll 57SA8 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35197 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 14,170.85 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
35198 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,007.83 Lab Supplies
35199 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,133.00 Security Guards
35200 Ronald&Lynne Walaszek 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35201 Water Environment Federation 11.75 Publication
35202 Watson Wyatt Data Services 359.00 Subscription
35203 Wane Sanitary Supply 736,79 Janitorial Supplies
35204 James Webb 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35205 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 125.94 Electrical Supplies
35206 Weslmark Paint Co. 225.90 Painting Supplles
$5207 WS Atkins Water 20,000.00 Bbsolids Testing Agreement
35208 Xerox Corporation 3,840.97 Copier Leases
35209 The Yakima Company 12,276.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00
35210 Oleeon Construction, Inc. 4,659.00 Construction J-52&Fuzzy Filter Piping Installation
35211 Union Bank of California 5,810.97 Construction 3-38-1,Retention
35212 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 615.86 Meeling77raining Expense Reimbursement
35213 Bruce A.Chapman 783.68 Employee Computer Loan Program
35214 Darrell S. Ennis 250.00 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimbursement
35215 John G.Gonzalez 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
Page 8 of 9
Claims Paid From 04/01/01 to 04115101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35216 Linda Lusurdo 126.30 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement
35217 David A.Ludwin 268.27 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement
35218 Robert Oaten 371.45 MeelingrTraining Expense Reimbursement
35219 Mark S.Roberts 330.89 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement
35220 Wendy T.Sevenandl 669.12 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
35221 Douglas M.Stewart 149.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
35222 Nonnan Eckenrode 525.00 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement
35223 Peter M.Green 480.00 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement
35224 Orange County Sanitation District 1,882.48 Petty Cash Reimb.
35225 Anna L.Piercy 480.00 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement
35226 James W.Silva 480.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,848,563.05
Payroll Disbursements
22727-22865 Employee Paychecks $ 171,242.28 Biweekly Payroll 04/04101
22866-22869 Interim Paychecks 4,892A2 Tuition Reimbursement Adjustments
22870-22870 Interim Paycheck 1,496.05 Lost Check Replacement
59560-60015 Direct Deposit Statements 710,742.57 Biweekly Payroll 0404101
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 888,373.32
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas $ 75,613.16 Society Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas 89,518.32 March Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 165,131.48
Total Claims Paid 04/01/01 -04115/O1 $ 4,902,067.85
Page 9 of 9
Claims Paid From 04/16101 to 04/30/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Pavable-Warrants
35227 BP Energy Company $ 168.746.72 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28
35228 Delta Dental 47,500.85 Dental Insurance Plan
35229 Orange County Sanitation District 445.851,53 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
35230 So.Cal. Gas Company 30.411.96 Natural Gas
35231 State Water Resources Control Board 25,000.00 Environmental Project-Seal Beach Closer
35232 Orange County Sanitation District 27,140.04 Workers Comp. Reimb.
35233 Airgas Safety 215.66 Safely Supplies
35234 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing 29.95 Publication
35235 Applied Blomonitoring 1,080.50 Professional Services J-85-TAC
36236 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 158A 5 Telephone Service
35237 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment
35238 Blue Planet Foundation 1,500.D0 Sponsorship-2001 Water Education Festival
35239 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
35240 Burlington Safety Laboratory of CA,Inc. 3,614.79 Electrical Paris&Safety Supplies
35241 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc 1,155.90 Service Agreement
35242 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment
35243 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 603.96 Electrical Supplies
35244 Convey Compliance Systems.Inc. 340.00 Software Maint.
35245 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Com ilting Services-EMT Management Training
35246 Costco Wholesale Membership 45.00 Membership
35247 CSMFO-Calif.Society of Mun.Fin.Off. 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration
35248 CWEA Membership %00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc.
35249 Diamond H Recognition 141.17 Employee Service Awards
35250 Endymion Systems,Inc. 1,400.00 Professional Services-Software Installation&Configuration
35251 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment
35252 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
35253 Industrial Metal Supply 1.172.41 Metal
35254 Inteq Group 1,295.D0 Source Control Training Registration
35255 Infl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1.345.14 Dues Deduction
35256 ISSA-LA 190.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration
35257 J.D.Edwards 420.00 Professional Consulting Services-AS400
35258 Leslie Rosenfeld 1.369.67 Professional Services J-85-TAC
35259 Mandic Motors 35.Do Towing Services
35260 MarVac Electronics 75.82 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35261 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 9,150.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service
35262 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 874.25 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training
35263 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 169.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35264 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment
35265 Orange Valve&Fi0ing Company 496.90 Lab Parts&Supplies
35266 OCEA 485.87 Dues Deduction
35267 Pacific Bell 1.077.36 Telephone Services
35268 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
35269 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
35270 Patriot Video Productions 29.95 Video
35271 Peace Officers Council of CA 882.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 8
Claims Paid From D4116101 to 04130101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35272 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 112.33 Specialty Gases
35273 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,005.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35274 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment
35275 SodChdce 1,993.38 Software
35276 South Coast Water 460.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program
35277 Southern California Edison 7,003.11 Power
35278 State Board of Equalization 767.30 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee
35279 Summit Steel 254.66 Metal
35280 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 806.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35281 The Unisource Corporation 2,105.57 Office Supplies
35282 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions
35283 Veritect 2,025.50 Software Maint.
35284 Venzon California 1,043.29 Telephone Services
35285 Vertex,Inc. 941.70 Software Maint.
35286 Bradley H.Cagle 1.145.00 Mcetingri-raining Expense Reimbursement
35287 Jan E.Collins 133.40 Meetingfhaining Expense Reimbursement
35288 Martin G.England 1,074.52 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement
35289 James W.Made 828.48 Meeting/freining Expense Reimbursement
35290 Simon L.Watson 562A6 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement
35291 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee
35292 American Express 41,469.07 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services
35293 RPI/Bio Gro 46,850.81 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
35294 Black&Veatch Corporation 286,298.13 Engineering Services P146-2.P7-76&J-71-3
35295 Blue Cross of California 186,776.81 Medical Insurance Premium
35296 Brown&Caldwell 731,942.51 Engineering Services 2.41
35297 BP Energy Company 187.314.59 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28
35298 Computerized Facility Intergmlion 232.484.83 Engineering Service J-25-1
35299 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 39,923.97 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95
35300 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 184,909.63 Engineering Services J-35-2
35301 Projects Partners 70,624.88 Temporary Employment Services
35302 Voided Check - -
35303 Southern California Edison 120.280.85 Power
35304 Team,Inc. 28,671.33 Valves
35305 Tran Consulting Engineers 61.994.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects 1-17.1-2-4 If 7-21
35306 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 107.835.35 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
35307 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 47,990.01 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No.C-044
35308 Voided Check - -
35309 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smarr 58,854.66 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
35310 Ken Thompson, Inc. 224.426.51 Construction 11-17-3&11-20
35311 A-Plus Systems 1,445.00 Notices&Ads
35312 Accutfe Fasteners,Inc. 34.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35313 AccuStendard,Inc. 373.45 Lab Supplies
35314 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Air Conditioning Service
35315 Agllent Technologies,Inc. 273.06 Lab Parts&Supplies
35316 Air Liquids America Corp. 1.843.78 Specialty Gasses
35317 Airborne Express 262.71 Air Freight
0
Page 2 of 8
Claims Paid From D4116/01 to 04130101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35318 Airgas Safety 54.31 Safely Supplies
35319 Mob Products,Inc. 457.11 Janitorial Supplies
35320 David Aldddge 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35321 American Management Association 1,595.00 Construction Management Training Registration
35322 Anderson GreernvcodIVarec 929.88 Repairs&Maintenance Service
35323 Anixler,Inc. 38.97 Electrical Supplies
35324 Appleone Employment Service 6,309.36 Temporary Employment Services
35325 Aquent,Inc. 8,456.25 Temporary Employment Services
35326 Arms Data Security 204.00 OOsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server
35327 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste Oil Removal
35328 Awards&Trophies By Bea 112.40 Plaques
35329 ABB Automation, Inc. 3,652.94 Inst. Repairs&Malnt.Service
35330 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 385.03 Telephone Service
35331 AT&T 228.70 Telephone Service
35332 Battery Specialties 783.29 Batteries
35333 BloMerleux Vllek, Inc. 1,0D0A2 Lab Parts&Supplies
35334 Bela Biresak 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35335 Bonhwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 9,142.65 Professional Services P2-84
35336 Bush&Associates,Inc. 8,476.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97
35337 California Auto Collision 2,344.17 Vehicle Repairs
35338 Callrol,Inc. 365.82 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
35339 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 6,000.00 Engineering Services J-71-1 &J-71-2
35340 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.108.20 Instrument Parts
35341 Rose Drive Friends Church 78.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35342 Computers America, Inc. 88.61 Computer Supplies
35343 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3.237.31 Electrical Supplies
35344 Corporate Express 261.79 Office Supplies
35345 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09
35346 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 70.00 Main.Agreement-Repaidinstallation of Base, Handheld&Vehicle Radios
35347 County of Orange,Auditor Controller 6.426.00 Underground Tank Program
35348 County Wholesale Electric Co. 730.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35349 Kenneth Cox 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35350 Crane America Services,Inc. 2,475A4 Crane Services
35351 Cummins Allison Corp. 966.99 Accounting Equipment Maim.Agreement
35352 Cydus Envirosystems,Inc. 3,441.10 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
35353 Cylec Industries 14,121.00 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
35354 CA Emissions Program 13.50 Vehicle Smog Testing
35355 CALPERLA 195.00 Membership-California Public Employers Labor Relations Association
35356 CWEA 100.00 Notices&Ads-California Water Env,Assoc.
35357 Del Mar Analytical 18.00 Blosolids Analysis
35358 Diamond H Recognition 1,037A7 Employee Service Awards
35359 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 884A7 Paint Supplies
35360 Dwyer Instruments,Inc. 446.56 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35361 DOB Engineering,Inc. 12,720.00 Temporary Employment Services
35362 DME,Inc. 2,406.69 Compressor Pans
35363 E.Sam Jones Distributom,Inc. 433.45 Electrical Supplies
Page 3 of 8
Claims Paid From 04116/01 to 04/30/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35364 Easi File Corporation 2.176.57 File Cabinets
35365 Enchanter,Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
35366 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,355.15 Lab Supplies
35367 DeVere C.Erb 863.20 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35368 EDSG:Environmental Data Solutions Group 5,200.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project
35369 ENS Resouces, Inc. 8,096.73 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate
35370 K.Faulk 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35371 K.Faulk 985.48 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35372 FedEx Corporation 78.47 Air Freight
35373 FileNET Corporation 2,600.00 Information Technology Training Registration
35374 Filter Supply Company 2,808.44 Filters
35375 First American Real Estate Solutions 648.15 Orange County Property Information
35376 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.Q. 1,598.93 Lab Supplies
35377 Fountain Valley Camera 42.42 Photo Supplies
35378 William Fox 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35379 Stacey Frank 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35380 Franklin Covey 101.02 Office Supplies
35381 Frederick Pump&Engineering 2.675.94 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
35382 Marcela Freud 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35383 Ganahl Lumber Company 171.14 Lumber/Hardware
35384 Gelinge Castle 417.33 Lab Supplies
35385 WIN Grainger, Inc. 481.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35386 Graybar 1.185.71 Electrical Supplies
35W7 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 1,669.16 Vehicle Repairs-V-163
35368 Nicholas or Heather Green 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35389 Kate Gulewich 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35390 GVD Commercial Properties 4,957.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program
35391 Hach Go Ponton Industries 9,448.69 Pump&Pump Supplies
35392 Pam Hales 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35393 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 122.00 Meeting Expenses
35394 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,419.00 Misc.Office Furniture
35395 HIM,Inc. 4,689.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35396 J.Holdren 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35397 The Holman Group 698.64 Employee Assistance Program Premium
35398 Home Depot 242.96 Small Hardware
35399 Hummingbird Communications Ltd. 5,833.29 Software Maint.
35400 Paul Hunter 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35401 City of Huntington Beach 57.27 Water Use
35402 Hasco Oil Co.,Inc. 52.79 Lube Oil
35403 Brian Ignatowski 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35404 Imaging Plus,Inc. 9.00 Printing Service
35405 Industrial Distribution Group 1,246.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35406 Information Resources 135.00 Human Resources Service
35407 Integra Biosciences,Inc. 1,663.09 Lab Supplies
35408 Irvine Ranch Water District 55.78 Water Use
35409 IBM Corp. 6,064.45 IBM AS1400 Lease
Page 4 of 8
Claims Paid From 04116101 to 04/30101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35410 Jamison Engineering Contractonl Inc. 19,380.00 Misc.Construction Services-Foster Pump Station&Yorba Linda Sawer Line
35411 Jay's Catering 352.61 Meeting Expenses
35412 John's Philly Grille 396.27 Meeting Expenses Pl-37 Workshop
35413 CSC Parts Sales/Johnson Controls,Inc. 115,57 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35414 Johnstone Supply 119.01 Electrical Supplies
35415 Karen Monaco&Associates 5,937.50 FIS Support Services
35416 Kelly Paper 665.40 Paper
35417 Joel Kimcher 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35418 Sergio Klotz 672.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35419 Christine Koud 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35420 Lab Support 1,966.13 Temporary Employment Services
35421 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 2,004.15 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs
35422 Le Molls Chemical Products 1,662.44 Chemicals
35423 LeAs-Nexis 28.90 Books&Publications
35424 Liebert Cassidy 595.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
35425 Lillick&Charles,L.L.P. 2.000.00 Professional Service-1993 Series Investments
35426 Gerald R.Jones 6,027.38 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
35427 Lucers 66.50 Meeting Expense
35428 Gary or Clara Madison 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35429 W. Maier 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35430 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 494.80 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
35431 McMurray-Stern 12,386.11 Misc.Off"Furniture-Spacesaver Shelving System
35432 Mac Analytical System 11,981.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis
35433 Media Clips, Inc. 175.00 Notices
35434 Medlin Controls Co. 107.07 Lab Supplies
35435 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 6,308.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study
35436 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 9,341.24 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance
35437 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 129.81 Safely Glass
35438 Mission Uniform Service 2,150.26 Uniform Rentals
35439 Motorola Communications&Electronics 15,529.66 Communication Equipment
35440 MmoPlotc 64.50 Photographic Services
35441 MAP 1.500.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs
35442 MCR Technologies, Inc. 712.84 Chart Paper
35443 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,520.00 Vacuum Truck Services
35444 Neal Supply Co. 546.74 Plumbing Supplies
35445 NeWersant of Southern California 4,072.95 Information Technology Training Registration
35446 City of Newport Beach 11.37 Water Use
35447 NewBasis 188.25 Building Supplies
35448 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.279.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
35449 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mall Delivery Service
35450 Emest Ochotorena 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35461 Office Depot Business Services Div. 359.46 Office Supplies
35452 Andres Olowskl 910.78 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35453 OneSouroe Distributors.Inc. 70.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35454 Orange County Water District 471.17 Hotel-Motel Water Efficiency Program
35455 Orange County Wimvater Works 278.53 Plumbing Parts&Supplies
Page 5 of 8
Claims Paid From 04/16/01 to 04/30/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35456 Orange Valve&Filling Company 106.34 Fittings
35457 Oct'¢Fire Protection 362.00 Service Agreement
35458 Oxygen Service Company 2,725.91 Specialty Gases
35459 OCB Repmgmphics 10,047.50 Printing Service-MO 1126/00
35460 Pacific Bell 56.14 Telephone Services
35461 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,031.14 Plumbing Supplies
35462 Pagera:t 2,440.66 Paging Services
35463 Emilia Palacios 630.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35464 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 190.60 Mechanical Supplies
35465 Parker Supply Company 671.14 Chemicals
35466 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 3,977.23 Tires
35467 Patriot Video Productions 446.59 Video
35468 Peed Art&Craft 108.01 Office Supplies
35469 SynaBro West,Inc. 24.134.99 Residuals Removal MID 3.20-95
35470 Polydyne,Inc. 24,812.98 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
35471 Cambridge Integrated Service 6.250.00 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin.
35472 Primary Source 14,471.25 Office Furniture
35473 Protech Petroleum Services.Inc. 604.69 Repairs&Maint.Service
35474 Pumping Solulkis,Inc. 3.568.40 Mechanical Supplies
35475 PCS Express 40.35 Courier Service
35476 PFE International,Inc. 3,616.80 Maintenance Agreement
35477 R.T.Engineering 744.68 Electrical Paris&Supplies
35478 Revco Technologies 107.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35479 Mack&Unda Rica 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35480 Timothy Robertson 83D.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35481 Steven Robinson 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35482 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 5,498.04 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development
35483 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 2,700.00 Engineering Services-P2 Clarifier Walkway-Pladorm Strengthening
35484 RPM Electric Motors 4,219.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies
35485 Santa Fe Bag Co.,Inc. 92.27 Bag Supplies
35486 J.Kidand Scarborough 830.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35487 Seam Industrial Sales 96.63 Mechanical Supplies
35488 Shamrock Supply CO.,Inc. 401.70 Mechanical Supplies
35489 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 22,025.00 Professional Services 2.41
35490 So.Cal.Gas Company 4,824.79 Natural Gas
35491 SoftChoice 424.95 Software
35492 Southern California Edison 24.81 Power
35493 Sparklarth, 4,147.15 Drinking Water/Coder Rentals
35494 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 58.54 OBse Supplies
35495 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals
35496 Sunset Industral Pads 743.57 Mechanical Supplies
35497 Super Max Mexican Restaurants 1,607.13 Open House
35498 SAWPA-Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 6.000.00 Professional Services-Sieman,Larsen&Marsh
35499 SKC-West,Inc. 513.37 Meter
35500 SPEC Services.Inc. 1,572.92 Engineering Services J-33-1
35501 Techpro Sal"&Service,Inc. 297.92 Repairs&Maintenance-Mechanical Seal on High Rate Mixer Pump
Page 6of8 -
Claims Paid From 04116/01 to 04/30/01
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35502 Tekdraulic5,Inc. 1.547.41 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
35503 The Merdwood Corporation 5,660.00 Professional Services-Biosdids Land Inspection
35504 Thermo Optek Corporation 81.85 Lab Equipment
35505 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 484.74 Lab Parts&Supplies
35506 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.D0 Elevator Maintenance
35507 Tierra Tractor 1,800.00 Construction-Regrading Manhole Areas
35508 Tom/§Lock&Safe Service&Sales 237.34 Locks&Keys
35509 Total Safety,Inc. 3.639.42 Safety Supplies
35510 The Trade Company 2,945.00 Repairs&Maintenance-Pit. 1 Cen-Gen Absorber Chiller
35511 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 9.28 Truck Supplies
35512 Troesdail Laboratories, Inc. 193.00 Lab Services
35513 Teksystems 12,630.00 Temporary Employment Services
35514 TRW EMC/Cakbralion Services 1.283.00 Lab Repairs&Maintenance
35515 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System
35516 Union Bank of California 1,144.92 Banking Services
35517 United Parcel Service 878.57 Parcel Services
35518 Unocal 76 190.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3.38-1 Inspection
35519 Valley Cities Supply Company 226.67 Plumbing Supplies
35520 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 122.30 Mechanical Supplies
35521 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10,400.00 Temporary Employment Service
35522 Verlmn California 3,082.94 Telephone Services
35523 Verne's Plumbing 1,006.80 Plumbing Equipment Service
35524 John C.Vlerra 663.30 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35525 Village Nurseries 87.03 Landscaping Supplies
35526 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,558.00 Door Repair
35527 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 16,551.12 Lab Pads&Supplies
35528 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,020.56 Security Guards
35529 Waxa Sanitary Supply 461.63 Janitorial Supplies
35630 Wellness Councils of America 287.50 Wellness Brochures
35531 West Coast Rotor 1.596.64 Mechanical Supplies
35532 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 94.46 Repairs&Maintenance-CCTV Camera Lens
35533 While Cap Industries 38.24 Painting Supplies
35534 Richard Wolfinger 483.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks
35535 Xerox Corporation 4.884.28 Cooler Leases
35536 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 197.85 Specialty Paper
35537 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 13,072.00 Construction J-63
35538 Union Bank of California 24,936.27 Construction 11-20.Retention
35539 Use M.Lawson 364.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
35540 Dong J.Min 848.25 MeeBngTTmIning Expense Reimbursement
35541 Michael D. Moore 186.35 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimbursement
35542 Simon L.Watson 477.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement
35543 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,040.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration
35544 Employee Activity Committee 500.00 Service Award Expense
35545 John Mirkovich and Dell Computer Corp. 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
35546 Orange County Sanitation District 1,272.71 Petty Cash Reimb.
Page 7 of 8
Claims Paid From 04116101 to 04130101
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
35547 R.W.Beck 54,233.18 Professional Services PI.66
35548 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Professional Savlces-Tula Ranch Biosolids Management Project
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,118,262.95
Payroll Disbursements
22871-22984 Employee Paychecks $ 170,397.08 Biweekly Payroll 04/18/01
22985.22986 Interim Paychecks 1,380.63 Payroll Adjustment 8 Check Reissue
60016-60466 Direct Deposit Statements 738,476.22 Biweekly Payroll 04/18/01
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 910,253.93
Wire Transfer Payments
State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 428,102.43 April Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 428.102.43
Total Claims Paid 04/16/01 -04130101 $ 5,456,619.31
Page 8 of 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date 7g /23/01
5d.of
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
10(a) _
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Mike White, Risk Manager
SUBJECT: SUMMONS RE EMINENT DOMAIN ACQUISITION OF REAL
PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS V. ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT, ET AL.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, City of Los Alamitos, a charter city v.
Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 01 CCO2192, in connection with eminent domain of the public road project
commonly known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement Project" in the City of Los
Alamitos; and 2) authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District.
SUMMARY
Please see attached memo from General Counsel.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
Memo from General Counsel.
GGS:MW:BG
\Voobalaroad alaragendalBoatd ABenOa Rewrls@00I Board Agenda ReMMSWWI%dem 10(a)dw
%—d'. Wp0 . Page 1
LAW OFFICES OF
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: General Counsel
DATE: May 15, 2001
RE: Eminent Domain Proceedings—Summons and Complaint
City of Los Alamitos v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CCO2192
The above-referenced matter of litigation was served on the District on May 3,
2001. The City of Los Alamitos has filed this condemnation proceeding to acquire real
property for the public roads project known as the "Katella Smart Street Improvement
Project", which will allow the City to widen Katella Avenue. The District has been
named as a party to the proceeding apparently because of its sewer line facilities in the
vicinity.
The District's Engineering Department will be making contact with the City of Los
Alamitos to ascertain exactly what, if any, impacts this acquisition, and more notably the
construction, would have on any District facilities. If in fad the District is to incur any
expense, or suffer adverse consequences as a result of the acquisition, we would then
immediately endeavor to negotiate the fair compensation from the City for any costs
incurred. If, on the other hand, the District is not to be adversely impacted, there should
be no significant participation required by the District in the proceedings.
It is recommended that the Office of General Counsel appear and defend, as
necessary, the interests of the District with respect to this litigation, and to coordinate
any work effort that may be undertaken at that location with the District's Staff.
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
GENERAL COUNSEL
TLW:pI
cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson
Mr. G.G. Streed
Mr. D.A. Ludwin
Mr. M. White
.OS ALAMITOS
yl,
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, April 25, 2001
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at 5 p.m., in the Distrieft Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Don Hughes
Peter Green, Vice Chair Director Russell Patterson, Guest
Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler
Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Mark Reid
Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee
Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT:
Blake Anderson, General Manager
Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
None Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General
Manager
Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources
Lisa Arosteguy, Human Resources Analyst
Tom Flanagan, Project Specialist
Jon Thomsic, SPMT PBECC Committee
Member
Mark Esquer, SPMT PBECC Committee Member
Jim Colston, SPMT PBECC Committee Member
Sonja Wassgren, Communications Analyst
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING '
The minutes of the March 28, 2001 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2
April 25, 2001
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode polled the committee on the new agenda format. Jean Tappan
indicated that the booklet was considered because it is much easier to produce with less labor. The
consensus was to continue using the booklet format for the Steering Committee agenda. It will be
trialed by the OMTS and FAHR Committees at their next meetings.
Chair Eckenrode announced that he would be inviting the new directors to attend future Steering
Committee meetings as follows: May 23, Director Beth Krom;June 27, Director Tony Kawashima;
July 18, Director Alice Jempsa;August 22, Director Tod Ridgeway; and September 26, Director Roy
Moore.
A. Addition of Assistant General Manager Position to FY 2001-02 Budget. The concern
expressed by the directors was leadership in the event the general manager is
unavailable. General Manager Anderson Indicated that Gary Streed acts as GM in
Anderson's absence. He also indicated that the department heads are essentially in
an Assistant GM capacity in that they are able to act with considerable autonomy with
respect to their areas of responsibility. It was decided to not include this position in
next years budget but that the Issue of succession planning will be addressed by the
general manager.
B. It was decided that the general manager will provide a memo to the Steering
Committee members outlining his accomplishments and performance over the Iasi
year. The Committee will take it under consideration at its June meeting and make
final recommendations to the Board.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
A. Leadership Training Update
B. SPMT PBECC Update
C. SPMT Upcoming Negotiations
The general manager tied these three items together because they are inter-related.
Tom Flanagan and Lisa Arosteguy updated the committee on the District-Chapman
University LEAD program and the goals, as well as feedback from participants to date.
The general manager and Mark Reid discussed the PBECC process and the
successes to date. Greg Mathews and Jim Colston provided an overview of
accomplishments over the past few months in attempting to change the culture to a
performance-based organization and to bring the compensation and performance
systems into alignment. Another presentation will be made to the FAHR Committee.
Lisa Tomko indicated that the SPMT Group's contract will expire on June 30, 2001. It
was discussed that the April FAHR Committee Interviewed three firms for providing
professional negotiation support to management for the upcoming SPMT negotiations.
Mr. Steve Filarsky was chosen. Chair Eckenrode, Mr. Anderson and Mrs. Tomko will
be meetng with Mr. Filarsky on Thursday,April 26, 2001. A negotiations calendar is
being developed. Mr.Anderson indicated that the goal is to maintain coherence and
consistency in the negotiating process with the other programs and values of the
District and to continue with the same tone that has been successful in recent
contracts.
V
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
April 25,2001
The Steering Committee asked for updates as deemed necessary by staff, including
special meetings K required.
D. Ocean Discharge Update (discussed below under E.)
E. Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No.J-85
Bob Ghirelli reported that the final action plan for the investigation received overall
consensus from the TAC. Six studies will be conducted beginning in May and ending
in September. The results from the studies will be used to make a decision on next
steps. The budget is now estimated at$2.6 million, an increase of$1.6 million from
the original budget. Staff continues to look for additional external funding sources.
Staff is also coordinating our studies with other agencies and organizations studies to
avoid duplication. EPA and the Regional Board have agreed to reduce the routine
summer monitoring required in our NPDES permit. There will be six 48-hour surveys
conducted,which will require 150 people round-the-clock. The results could Impact
the level of treatment on our effluent.
Mr. Ghirelli reported that the plan to reduce the amount of secondary to the ouffall as
detailed in the Strategic Plan is on hold until these results of the summer studies are
known. There is a question on whether to re-think the Strategic Plan recommendation
and prepare an addendum. Staff is working on establishing estimated costs of full
secondary treatment. The application for our NPDES permit is due in December
2002. The studies results will frame what the application will look like.
Scott Baugh, the Districts legislative consultant, has suggested a public opinion poll to
establish a benchmark and begin to understand the expectations of the public.
The Steering Committee members agreed to a poll, using a base of 1500.
F. County-wide Visioning/Leadership Retreat for Electeds
Mr. Anderson reported on meetings that he attended with other agencylorganization
leaders and their consideration of a retreat for a county-wide retreat to help develop
alliances and shared vision between them.
The Steering Committee members agreed that discussions should continue.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that a closed session would not be required.
(8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-B)
A. Committee Meetings
It was agreed that this discussion would be held over to May.
B. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in May.
There were no changes requested.
m
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4
April 25, 2001
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May 23, 2001 at 5 p.m.
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for May 23, 2001 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m.
ubmitted by,
G a_>
e n Tappan
Bring Committee Secretary
cwy mawMe uxnnre CmvnIDNglWyMiM sCWWa
w,
i
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2001 — 5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on May 2, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
James M. Ferryman,Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager
Don Bankhead Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Tony Kawashima Fred O'Brien, ECM Scientist
Anna Piercy George Robertson, ECM Senior Scientist
Jim Hams, Project Manager
Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
Mark A. Murphy
Paul Walker
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the April 4, 2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance '
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
May 2, 2001
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Chair reported that Terri (Josway) Roberts, Safely Manager,who has been instrumental in
putting together the District's safety program, is leaving the District and will be the safety
manager at Mission Energy, a subsidiary of Edison.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present. Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, updated the
Directors on the SARI Line Relocation Project. She stated staff was currently reviewing the
alternatives contained in the EIR approved for this project. Meetings were also being held with
the City of Yorba Linda and those citizens affected by the proposed project.
(7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Patrick Miles, Director of Technical Services, advised the Directors the online timekeeping
system project will be cancelled with the current vendor. Steps were underway to seek
reimbursement from the vendor for the project.
Mr. Miles also reported on recent thefts of laptop computers and other materials, of which the
thefts were tracked down to a contracted vendor employee who confessed to the thefts. Staff
was hopeful that the stolen materials would be recovered.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, stated that staff was able to lock in natural
gas at$7.70. The current market price is $15. He advised that both plants have sufficient
energy to power the treatment systems and the District has emergency generators.
Mr. Dolan reported that the compressed natural gas pumps have been pumping approximately
20% extra gas, and staff has been miscalculating how much profit the District has made. Plans
are underway to ensure the gas pumps are calibrated more frequently.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, recognized Mike Moore, ECM Manager, who
reported that the National Academy of Sciences has started reviewing the federal regulations on
the management of biosolids. They recently met in Washington, DC to receive testimony from a
number of experts. There will also be a meeting in June. Staff is convening a panel of experts
to testify at that meeting,
Mr. Moore also reported that negotiations are underway with Kings County to allow
consideration of other types of processes to be included in the ordinance they recently adopted
which only allows Class A compost after February 2006.
Mr. Ghirelli then gave a brief update on ocean discharge issues, and stated staff was focusing
on four categories: science, technology and financing, regulations and permits, and
communications/public outreach.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
May 2, 2001
Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, advised she would be attending all committee
meetings through the summer due to the ocean discharge issues. She reported that a public
opinion research via a telephone survey would be conducted, which would assist in the
education to be included in the communication outreach. She also requested Directors to
advise staff if they know of any group that might be interested in Teaming about ocean discharge
issues.
Bob Ghirelll then gave an update on current legislative issues.
(10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
(11) ACTION ITEMS
a. OMTSOI-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a sole source
Consultant Services Agreement with Karen Monaco and Associates to
provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial Information
System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one year period
effective July 1, 2001,with option to renew for one year.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to
the Board of Directors.
b. OMTS01-19 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager
to issue a sole source purchase order to DigiTerra Inc. for the purchase of
an IBM AS400 Model 820 (Specification No. E-2001-44BD) in support of
the District's Financial Information System,for an amount not to exceed
$400,000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance
and applicable taxes.
Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, requested the motion
be modified to delete the sole source purchase to DlgTerra. Staff has
recently been informed that other vendors could provide the same
equipment for possibly a lower cost. Directors entered into discussion
regarding sole-source contracts, competitive bidding process, and capital
expenditures.
The motion was then amended to:
Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Purchase of an IBM
AS400 Model$20 (Specification No. E-2001-448D) in support of the
District's Financial Information System, for an amount not to exceed
$400,000 including all hardware, software, all applicable maintenance
and applicable taxes, contingent upon advice of General Counsel, in
conjunction with the Purchasing Manager, with respect to the appropriate
method of obtaining the best price for the purchase.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to
the Board of Directors.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance tiy:
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
May 2, 2001
C. OMTS01-20 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)authorize the General
Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and approve
Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with SeaVisual
Consulting, Inc. for services to analyze, interpret and report current meter
data, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not
to exceed $129,884, and extending the term of the contract to June 30,
2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods; and (2)authorize
the General Manager to conduct sale source contract negotiations and
approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with
Tetra Tech, Inc. for services to evaluate the effects to the coastal marine
environment of the discharge of treated wastewater effluent, for an
additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed
$186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with
an option to renew for three one-year periods.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to
the Board of Directors.
d. OMTS01-21 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)authorize the General
Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000 from the
FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary design
and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and (2)approve in
concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification
No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for FY
2001-2002.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to
the Board of Directors.
e. OMTS01-22 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1) approve a budget
amendment of$1,575.000 for laboratory and miscellaneous supplies,
equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous
contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination
Investigation, Phase III,Job No. J-85, for a total project budget of
$2,575.000; and (2) authorize the General Manager to negotiate and
award sole source contracts, Including those in excess of$100,000,with
government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment, supply, and
service companies qualified to carry out those contracts, in connection
with the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase
III, Job No. J-85,without further Board action required.
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, requested the action be
amended to reflect an additional $350,000 to the overall project budget to
cover the estimated cost of studies with the AES Power Plant in
Huntington Beach. AES will not commit to these monies until they have
been granted their permit to operate. However, if AES was able to supply
v Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
May 2, 2001
the funds, he assured the committee that the $350,000 would not be
spent.
The motion was then amended to:
(1) Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and
miscellaneous supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff
time and miscellaneous contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES
Power Plant portion of studies, for the Huntington Beach Shoreline
Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85, for a total project
budget of$2,925,000; (2)authorize staff to seek reimbursement from
AES Power Plant for$350,000; (3)authorize the General Manager to
negotiate and award sole source contracts, including those in excess of
$100,000, with government agencies, universities, consulting, equipment,
supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those contracts; and
(4) pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies relating to
said project would be made available by the District.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to
the Board of Directors.
(12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
June 6, 2001 at 5 p.m.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 6
May 2, 2001
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Submitted by:
Penny M. Kt
Operations, Maintenance tad Technical Services
Committee Secretary
GA .dtatagendatOMTSt20g1t2001 OMTS Minutest050201 minutes.dw
OMTSCOMMITTEE Meeting Date TotoIDir.
B/@/ot 05/z3/ol
AGENDA REPORT Item Numoer Item Numt
OMT5o1-IB 13(d
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Patrick B. Miles, Director of Information Technology
Originator: Robert Thistle, Information Technology
SUBJECT: Financial Information System Technical Support
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a sole source Consultant Service Agreement with Karen Monaco and
Associates to provide technical consulting support for the District's Financial Information
System in an amount not to exceed $192,192 for a one-year period effective July 1,
2001, with an option to renew for one year.
SUMMARY
The current JDEdwards Financial Information System provides an integrated system for
the input, processing and tracking of financial data. The system is used District-wide to
provide processes such as: Financial Reporting, Employee Payroll, Requisitioning,
Purchasing, Warehouse Management, Human Resources, Budgeting etc.
The Information Technology Department has made the strategic decision to outsource
the on-going maintenance effort of the current version of the JDEdwards Financial
Information System. The goal is to concentrate in-house resources on learning the new
version and upgrading the current JDEdwards World software to the more open
systems version called OneWorld Xe. Once the upgrade is complete, the skill set
needed to support the legacy World software will not be needed.
Since June of 2000, Karen Monaco and Associates has been contracted to provide
technical support for the current version of the JDEdwards Financial Information
System. These services have been provided on a three days per week schedule as
required. Total amount paid will be approximately$150,000 for the period June 2000
through July 2001. Our current JD Edwards technical support contract with Karen
Monaco & Associates expires as of June 30, 2001. The District's current Financial
Information System will continue to require three days per week of directed technical
support for the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002.
In order to provide continued technical support for the District's Finance Information
System, staff request that the consulting services provided by Karen Monaco and
Associates be continued for a twelve-month period starting in July of 2001.
Gax90b1a0anEa\BWN pgarAa Repw1z�01 BearC RpenEa Repg6\9501\Ilvmfa�c).Manero.Occ
ReweE: eawne Page 1
.'
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff is recommending utilizing the consultant services for a 12-month period as follows:
Hours/Week Rate Not to Exceed No. of Weeks Total
24 $140.00 52 $174,720
Contingency @ 10% $17,472
Total NTE $192,192
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Duties
Duties consist of on site advanced JDE assistance and include additional tasks and
responsibilities as directed by the Information technology staff. Examples of task are as
follows:
JD Edwards Software Tasks
• Minor programming customization of modules per District specifications or as directed from
manufacturer. Cumulative upgrade of World and One World software as needed.
• Assist in production of year-end and Quarterly required Financial Reporting.
• Assist in testing software in a development environment, and migrate upgraded software
into production environment.
• Create reports for users as needed using World Writer or modifying canned Dream Writers
per user specifications.
• Provide assistance with development of alternative reporting methods (Business Objects/
Oracle, etc.)
• Provide technical knowledge in development of alternative reporting solutions for end users.
• Assist users in becoming familiarwith functions within World and One World.
• As directed, modify business unit security and account number access for requisition entry.
• Provide Help Desk support with all aspects pertaining to the AS400, JD Edwards software,
and third party software on the AS400 as they relate to JD Edwards.
• Software support— PTF installation, O/S support, maintenance, upgrades.
• Software support, maintenance, administration —DBU software.
G>.m a.odd QOI B.aId n,nda Moaaco d e
a.„�: wMa Page 2
• Troubleshoot any problems with the JD Edwards software.
• Provide technical expertise on file details and application processes
1
ALTERNATIVES
Formally bid for these services. This could potentially cost more based on other quotes
received for similar services. Additionally, effective time would be lost bringing this
person "up to speed" on the District's Financial Information System needs. Lastly,
flexibility to respond to needs as they arise might be jeopardized.
Hire a full-time employee and train them to the equivalent level of knowledge and
experience. To acquire equivalent skills and abilities would require years of hands on
training and experience. There is a risk of losing this individual once training is
complete.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
G:1WENNpendalO .A .Repat5WOI0 19 A'.MeReparls10501111em 13(c).Wp ...d¢
ftNYd: a=. Page 3
OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date Bd.oroa.
OSIO2101 o5123101
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numtier
GMTSOI-19 13(d)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Originator: Richard Castillon, Manager Customer& Network Support
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF IBM AS400 SERVER
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Purchase of an IBM AS400 Model
820 (Specification No. E-2001-44BD) in support of the District's Financial Information
System, for an amount not to exceed $400.000 including all hardware, software, all
applicable maintenance and applicable taxes. The purchase to be made by soliciting
sealed bids from authorized IBM dealers.
SUMMARY:
The District is currently leasing an IBM AS400 Model S20. This lease will expire June
30, 2001. The AS400 is required to operate the JDEdwards Financial Information
System (FIS) application. The current hardware and operating system technology is at
the end of its technological life and will not meet the District's future needs.
Staff recommends that the General Manager, or his designee, as authorized by
Delegation of Authority Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, purchase an AS400 Model 820 for
the following reasons:
1. In 1998, staff leased an IBM AS400 Model S20 in support of the FIS System.
The District is currently using nearly all of the disk and processor capacity on
this system. The new AS400 Model 820 will provide the needed capacity to
effectively support FIS for the next three years. The District will be gaining
approximately 100 percent processor speed and approximately 400 percent
disk capacity to keep up with growing demands.
2. The District is required to upgrade the operating system for the AS400 to the
most current version since IBM no longer supports the operating system
currently installed on the model S20. The operating system upgrade is
required in order for IBM to support the software and hardware.
3. Leasing the AS400 820 would be more costly to the District. If the hardware
were leased, the cost would include an additional $20,000 in finance charges.
4. International Business Machines has promptly maintained and provided
support to the District for the FIS since 1996. JDEdwards, the FIS vendor, is
partnered with IBM.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY:
N/A
GSwp.dWagendalBoard Agenda Repoda@001 Board Agenda Reports=01 Vtem 13(d)IBM A5400.doc
namne:VIM Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
(CIP SP-64 Financial Information System Upgrade)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted as a lease, but operating funds exist.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Contact Rich Castillon at: (714) 593-7283 or e-mail at: Castillon@ocsd.com
ALTERNATIVES:
Lease at same cost plus finance charges.
CEQA FINDINGS:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda ReportsUO01 Board Agenda Reports10501\Item 13(d)IBM A5400.doc
Remsed:a11=0 Page 2
M OMTS COMMITTEE M.,2,200e1 %'I V21
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ikm Number
OMTSa1-20 13(e)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: George Robertson, Senior Scientist, ECM
SUBJECT: SOLE SOURCE OCEAN MONITORING PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES SUPPORT CONTRACTS FOR SEAVISUAL
CONSULTING, INC. AND TETRA TECH, INC.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and
approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with SeaVisual
Consulting, Inc. for services to analyze, interpret and report current meter data, for an
additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $129,884, and
extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2002 with an option to renew for three
one-year periods; and
(2)Authorize the General Manager to conduct sole source contract negotiations and
approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.
for services to evaluate the effects to the coastal marine environment of the discharge
of treated wastewater effluent, for an additional amount of$95,000, increasing the total
amount not to exceed $186,000, and extending the term of the contract to June 30,
2002 with an option to renew for three one-year periods
SUMMARY
The District has in-sourced most elements of its required ocean monitoring program.
However, there is a need to continue to have external high-level professional support in
the analysis, interpretation and reporting of complex physical, chemical and biological
oceanographic data. In particular, this type of consulting support is needed when
integrating the three ocean monitoring program components (Core, Strategic Process
Studies, and Regional).
In 1999, the District entered into two agreements with consulting firms to (1) analyze,
interpret, and report current data obtained by District staff and (2) to provide high level
review of ocean monitoring results and provide recommendations for future monitoring
work. Task 1 has been done by SeaVisual Consulting, Inc. (SeaVisual), and Task 2 has
been done by Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). Staff has concluded that both of these
support activities are still required, especially as we develop our ocean discharge permit
reapplication that is due in December 2002.
Both SeaVisual and Tetra Tech have completed their respective tasks to the satisfaction
of District's ocean monitoring staff, and staff has recommended continuing with both
companies through at least June 30, 2002 with three one-year contract renewal options.
e1xyGlatceenGlBwrd n d.ftWa v l ewrd Apmde Reroneww+uW.t%.)dx
R Wi 4WI (en)4-1act(m ) Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
SeaVisual Consulting, Inc.: Increase existing contract amount of$99,844 by an
additional $30,000 for a total amount not to exceed $129,844.
TetraTech, Inc: Increase existing contract amount of$91,000 by an additional $95,000
for a total amount not to exceed $186,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 101)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
At the present time, the District has a resource limitation in the number and expertise of
available ocean monitoring staff to analyze all of the data generated by the ocean
monitoring program. For the time being, management has decided to rely on external
consulting support for these services.
ALTERNATIVES
1)Allow contracts to expire and not renew.
2) Send contracts out for competitive bids.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
None.
c',.d..I-d., .rd A.-.R.pon.¢om Boom n1md Reoddaosonuon,13W me
R—.. I..' 1» 14IMI( 1 Page 2
OMTS COMMITTEE M0520soate roea.o oo-.
OS-02-01 05-23-01
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
OMrS 01-21 13
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Fred O'Brien, Scientist, ECM
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF OCEAN MONITORING VESSEL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Authorize the General Manager to approve an amount not to exceed $50,000
from FY 2000-2001 budget for a naval architect to provide a preliminary design
and cost analysis for an ocean monitoring vessel; and,
(2) Approve in concept the purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel (Specification
No. V2001-43-BD)for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for
FY 2001-2002.
SUMMARY
In 1998, a decision was made to insource the Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP). The
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division (ECM) has successfully
accomplished all field elements of the ocean monitoring program for the past 2 years.
In the process, the OMP budget has been reduced by $500,000 per year.
To accomplish the field sampling, staff has had to rely on contract vessels for our
monitoring needs. The number of contract vessels in the area is limited, and their
availability is even more limited. The District's program is outgrowing some of the
vessels that are used most frequently because of the increased size of the monitoring
equipment and the number of staff needed for particular surveys.
ECM staff has evaluated the feasibility of the District purchasing a vessel for ocean
monitoring. Key factors such as safety, working conditions,financial feasibility,
projected needs, and the availability of adequately sized contract vessels were
examined and addressed in the attached staff report.
Staff has concerns about the quality, efficiency, effectiveness, and limited capability of
the vessels currently used. The need for a correctly sized and adequately equipped
vessel is of paramount importance. The purchase of a monitoring vessel for$1.3 million
will dramatically increase the safety of our monitoring staff, increase our productivity,
and set our OMP as a world class operation.
Staff recommends employing the services of a naval architect to evaluate the District's
monitoring needs and provide a more detailed vessel cost evaluation and final design.
G'.1xyDlabpentlaBOaM ABentla RepMiV 001 BCar4 ADentla flepOfI51D5D1\IIBm 1]11�0[BYn VefaN PUF95e.tlpC
Re.oe¢ a GB Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY Budget 2001-02, Capital Equipment)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
Submit an RFP for a long-term contract (on the order of 10 years) for a contractor to
provide a vessel meeting our specifications for annual usage between 175 and 225
days at a rate between $1,500 and $2,200 per day. The annual cost at these rates is:
$1,500 / day $2,200 / day
175 days $262,500 1 $385,000
225 days $337,500 1 $495,000
ECM staff feels that this alternative is not the most cost-effective use of District's capital.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Ocean Monitoring Vessel Feasibility Evaluation
c\xyAWU gende\Besrdnp ft RepavQWIe Id Agm .RePo.'I{WSOMM 13(1)OMnvea Pu,wxem
R W W"a Page 2
y
April 6, 2001
STAFF REPORT
Ocean Monitoring Vessel Feasibility Evaluation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the feasibility of purchasing a monitoring vessel
for the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP).
The conclusion of this effort has lead staff to make the recommendation for the District
to purchase a monitoring vessel. The reasons for this recommendation are based on
not only financial feasibility, but other key factors such as the safety of staff, availability
of contract vessels, and future vessel needs. These and other issues are discussed in
this report to provide management with a detailed evaluation of this recommendation.
The District's Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division (ECM) administers the
comprehensive and multifaceted OMP in support of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit and 301(h)waiver. Part of this program includes
using ocean research vessels to support the monitoring of receiving waters, sediments
and organisms in the coastal environment.
During the fiscal year 1999 to 2000 (FY 99-00), ECM conducted all fieldwork associated
with the OMP to fulfill one of management's decisions to conduct the monitoring
in-house rather than rely on outside contractors. As a result, we have increased our
reliance on contract vessels for field sampling. The total cost for OMP contractor vessel
support for 173 boat days during FY 99-00 was $172,250. Under ideal sea conditions
this arrangement is marginally acceptable. However, under any other condition safety
is compromised.
The total cost of the ocean monitoring field sampling will increase as we shift to a vessel
of adequate size and stability to accommodate sampling equipment and crew size. It is
projected that the cost to contract such a vessel would be $2,200 per day. Based on
last year's usage and projected needs, contracted field sampling would cost
approximately$495,000 per year.
Recently, state and federal regulators have expressed a desire to make various ocean-
monitoring programs more compatible. Over the last two years, the District has been
involved in an effort sponsored by the Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project (SCCWRP)to develop a "Model POTW Monitoring Program:' This program
would be used by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the various Regional
Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB)to modify monitoring programs in future
permits. The model program will include three major elements— core monitoring,
special studies and regional monitoring. This model template is the same one used by
G:Wgdl PWa, dNw R�la Wngem Rwp WWwmm 1310.0ean Ve NNm.ax
RedaN: eaves Page 3
the District for its ocean-monitoring program, therefore staff does not anticipate major
changes to our program when the model-monitoring program is finally adopted.
ECM staff has concerns about the safety of the contract research vessels that are
available in southern California. The vessels used most frequently by the District are
small and relatively unstable in moderate (wind speeds in excess of 10 MPH) sea
conditions. The shipboard environment is a potentially dangerous environment.
Contributing factors are motion, noise, vibration, exposure to weather, close working
conditions, vessel machinery, sampling gear, wet surfaces, and lines under tension. All
pose a threat to the safety of the scientific crew. Providing a larger vessel would greatly
reduce the risk of personnel injury and equipment damage.
The District's OMP was compared to the programs of Los Angeles County Sanitation
District(LACSD), the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego. Program elements
are comparable in scope and size. All three agencies conduct all of their monitoring in-
house and each own two or three vessels.
Staff also surveyed these three POTW's regarding their vessel operating costs. Costs
varied among agencies and no per-vessel dollar amounts were given. The City of San
Diego's budget is $50,000 per year for maintenance of their two vessels, but rarely
spends that amount. The vessel captain performs most of the maintenance. Work that
is beyond the captain's capabilities is performed by contractors or in some cases by
other agency personnel.
Staff presents a couple of options with regard to providing a licensed captain to pilot the
proposed vessel. The District could either hire a captain or contract out the position. A
licensed captain ensures that a minimum level of competency and experience is
achieved. On a vessel the size needed for our monitoring program, it is reasonable to
expect the captain to have a thorough working knowledge of the mechanical systems on
board and possess the ability to perform the maintenance of those systems.
Staff has determined that we would need a vessel between 55 and 65 feet in length.
The vessel must be stable and properly equipped to deploy a variety of monitoring
devices to effectively complete all elements of our monitoring program. The estimated
cost of a vessel this size, designed to our specifications and equipped with all of the
electronics for navigation, would cost between $900,000 and $1.2 million (calculation is
based on an industry estimate of$15,000 to $20,000 per linear foot of vessel, using a
60-foot vessel).
PURPOSE
The purpose of this staff report is to evaluate whether or not the District should
purchase a vessel for its OMP. Currently, ECM staff administers a comprehensive and
multifaceted OMP in support of the District's NPDES permit and 301(h)waiver. Part of
this OMP includes using ocean research vessels to support the monitoring of receiving
waters, sediments, and organisms in the local coastal environment.
G:"AW�endal Onenm fty VNIe WA da Fey WWIuum I3(0. wn Ve Puree dm
Aeee MOM Page 4
V
This report gives the background of the OMP and discusses recent program changes,
safety concerns, current program costs, and projected costs for the vessel and related
expenses of ownership.
Because one of management's overall objectives is to make ECM the primary service
provider for the OMP, relying on contractor support only where necessary, this will
ultimately change the OMP from a "contractor-driven" program to a "contractor-
supported" program.
During FY 1999-00,the OMP insourced monitoring fieldwork that was previously
performed by contractors. This has increased the demand for vessel usage by OMP
staff, which has resulted in a number of logistical problems.
The working assumption for this report is that the District could own and operate its own
vessel in a safe and cost-effective manner that would enhance our ability to meet our
current and future monitoring needs.
BACKGROUND
The District has a long history of monitoring the effects of our discharge on the coastal
marine waters in support of our ocean discharge permit. The District's offshore
monitoring effort includes sampling for water quality, benthic environment (sediment
geochemistry and biological assessment), and trawls for assessing fish and invertebrate
community health and structure. Each program element contains the following types of
work: field sampling, sample analysis, data handling and reporting, data interpretation,
and summary report writing, culminating in the OMP Annual Report.
From the early 1970's until 1985, District's staff did all the work, including all field
sample collection, oceanography, and marine biology studies. With the issuance of the
301(h)waiver in 1985, the mandated OMP was redesigned with additional program
components to determine compliance with the California Ocean Plan and 301(h)
criteria. A management decision for this new Ocean Monitoring Program was made to
out-source the program because it was determined that the elements of the mandated
OMP were beyond the District's resources at that time. Being a high-profile program, it
was also felt that having a third-party" contractor conduct the program added a degree
of objectivity and "instant credibility"that would allow the program to better stand up to
scrutiny by regulators, environmental groups and the public. Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC)was subsequently selected through a competitive bid
process.
While the contractor-driven approach to the OMP was appropriate at the time, the
paradigm has changed. With the re-issuance of our 301(h)waiver in 1998, the OMP
was redesigned to include three program elements— Core, Regional, and Strategic
Process Studies (SPS). The Core Monitoring Program has been designed to address
two major issues. First, to determine permit compliance with state and federal criteria.
Second, to continue a long-term time line to identify data trends and determine whether
any observed changes are due to natural conditions or to human impacts. Participation
G.Wq.e.,naa, .Ayenaa Fepa .'B W Ppenaa R¢pvla\0501111em 1MD.Ve PURx
Ra.: WMS Page 5
v
in regional monitoring is also a requirement of our permit. This involves cooperative
monitoring of the Southern California Bight (SCB)with other local, state and federal
agencies. Finally, SIPS are stated goals of the District's ocean monitoring program.
The purpose of SPS is to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical, and
biological processes that affect discharges into the marine environment. The OMP staff
also carries out additional special projects, such as the Huntington Beach 9 North
investigation.
In July 1998, District management made a decision to in-source the OMP. The initial
phases were completed in May 1999, with the in-sourcing of the benthic and trawl field
sampling and chemistry program components. Phase II of the in-sourcing project
brought the OMP database management system and the writing of the annual report in-
house. This phase is currently in progress. The largest remaining contract dependency
in the OMP is contract vessels. The other three major southern California POTWs,
including the City of San Diego with a 301(h)waiver, conduct in-house ocean
monitoring programs with support of their own vessels.
INCREASED NEED FOR VESSELS
Changes to District's Ocean Monitoring Program
Recently, state and federal regulators have expressed a desire to make various ocean-
monitoring programs more compatible. Over the last two years the District has been
involved in an effort with SCCWRP to develop a "Model POTW Monitoring Program"
that would be used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the various
Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB)to modify monitoring programs in
future permits. The model program will include three major elements—core monitoring,
special studies, and regional monitoring. This model template is the same one used by
the District for its ocean-monitoring program so staff does not anticipate major changes
to our program when the model monitoring program is finally adopted.
Core Monitoring: The District's Core Monitoring Program has been designed to
address two major issues. One is to determine permit compliance with state and
federal criteria. The other is to continue long-term sampling that will allow the District to
identify data trends and determine whether observed changes are due to natural
conditions or to human impacts. While the type of monitoring for this program element
won't change, the methods will. For example, future water quality sampling will
probably include the use of oceanographic moorings in conjunction with routine water
quality surveys to better capture and understand temporal variability of the receiving
waters. The use of moorings will require additional vessel needs for deployment and
servicing. The number of days needed is dependent upon the number and type of
instrumentation deployed on these moorings.
Regional Monitoring: Participation in regional monitoring is a requirement of our
permit. This involves cooperative monitoring of the SCB with other local, state, and
federal agencies. The frequency of this sampling has been every four years
c:"AMW sneamreNngaaa i+eoms 1e n wwpwummnum„�n.oc«,n veaa wrmw.em
�W: aaome Page 6
(1994, 1998) with the next sampling to occur in 2002. The level of effort and vessel
days required for this monitoring should be consistent with past efforts. Fourteen boat
days were required to complete the Regional Monitoring in 1998.
Strategic Process Studies (SPS): One of the stated goals of the District's ocean
monitoring program—and one that is being adopted for the Model POTW Monitoring
Program — is to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological
processes that affect discharges into the marine environment. This knowledge will lead
to improved management of the discharge of urban runoff and treated wastewater into
the coastal marine environment. Each year, the District, in concert with EPA and the
RWQCB, adopts the SPS that then become permit requirements. Future SPS will
require vessel time to deploy oceanographic equipment, and collect sediment and
biological samples.
Special or Cooperative Studies: Non-permit required studies require the use of an
oceanographic research vessel. Examples are the 1999 Huntington Beach beach
closure and the studies to identify the source. Both studies required significant vessel
support. Ongoing investigations off Huntington Beach also require vessel support.
SCCW RP research done in our study area often requires the use of a vessel provided
by the District. In addition, other research groups (e.g., NOAA, USGS, and EPA) have
expressed interest in doing studies in our area that would benefit from the use of a
District-owned vessel. Finally, routine operational inspections of the outfall pipe require
the support of a research vessel.
SAFETYISSUES
Vessels for hire are chosen based on the specific vessel characteristics, cost, and the survey to
be performed. The number of available and affordable research vessels in southern California
Is small. Each vessel has limitations and staff has concerns about those limitations with regard
to safety and comfort of the scientific crew.
As a member of the scientific crew, one must learn to work safely in a potentially
dangerous shipboard environment. Such factors as motion, noise, vibration, exposure
to weather, close working conditions, vessel machinery, sampling gear, uneven
surfaces, wet surfaces, and lines under tension are not normally encountered on shore.
As such, the size and stability of the vessel is important. Most monitoring equipment is
heavy and awkward when being deployed and retrieved. There is a risk of personal
injury or equipment damage when equipment is being launched and recovered from a
small boat that is pitching and rolling. Staff uses every precaution to avoid personal
injury and equipment damage. However, sea conditions, vessel stability, and fatigue
dictate the success or failure of a deployment. A larger more stable vessel with a larger
working area would significantly reduce the risk of personal injury and equipment
damage.
Another concern is that sea conditions usually deteriorate in the afternoon as the wind
increases. The vessels we currently use to perform much of the monitoring are
G.x dYNwOn dAgent Repmze l BwM Agenda ReWs%OWNlem 13M. mnVe pWiaY.aa
R.N. a 5 Page 7
relatively small and are unstable in somewhat light to moderate sea conditions (wind
speeds in excess of 10 mph). Monitoring has been canceled when conditions
deteriorated, and rescheduled when sea conditions were more favorable. Staff spends
considerable effort and time mobilizing for each survey. Using a more stable survey
vessel would decrease the number of aborted surveys, and reduce costs associated
with rescheduling and mobilizing a survey.
Crew fatigue while conducting field sampling is also an important safety consideration.
Trying to maintain balance on a small boat that is pitching and rolling while handling
heavy monitoring equipment is physically exhausting. Couple this with a three or four-
day survey and even the most fit are fatigued. This is when the potential for accidents
increases.
The vessels we currently contract also lack adequate cabin space. The majority of the
cabin space is used for scientific instrumentation, sample collection equipment, and
personal gear. As a consequence, the crew is displaced. With limited cabin space,
conditions are cramped and congested. Typically, staff has two meals onboard each
day, and with limited space, there is virtually no place to sit, other than the cabin floor or
outside on the deck in the work area.
CURRENT VESSEL COSTS
Each OMP element requires the services of a boat that is suitable for the survey to be
undertaken. The vessel is required to have state-of-the-art equipment for navigation,
positioning, and mechanical systems for equipment deployment and sample processing.
The table below provides a breakdown for vessel expenses and non-tangibles for fiscal
year1999.
Organization Enchanter Seaventures SCMI Davey's Total
Locker
Price per day $700 $1550 $2,500 $800
#of days used in 137 9 24 3 173
1999
Total Cost $95,900 $13,950 $60,000 $2,400 $172,25
0
Support all No No Yes No
monitoring program
elements
Safetv Fair I Fair I Good I Good
Efficiency(transit Poor Poor Good Good
time,deck space,
etc).
Availability Excellent Limited Limited Poor
An evaluation of the commercial vessels available for the District's OMP shows that only
one is capable of handling all of the requested field sampling. However, the availability
of this vessel (SCMI) is limited due to the extensive use as an educational platform and
c:wv.ammae�ae�eovanewz sewu�oo+eoab new.a=o�•dmimam iamae. vela nnm.x.aoo
Page 8
V
support for the USC Wrigley Institute. This vessel is also expensive. In addition, use of
these platforms requires District staff to adapt sampling methods and equipment based
on the constraints of the vessel and not on optimal sampling methodologies.
The total cost of the ocean monitoring field sampling will increase as we shift to a vessel
of adequate size and stability to accommodate sampling equipment and crew size. It is
projected that the cost to contract such a vessel would be $2,200 per day. Based on
last year's usage and projected needs, contracted field sampling would cost
approximately $495,000 per year.
A major problem with contract vessels is their availability. There are no guarantees that
the District can obtain a vessel at the required time. Routine monitof ng takes place
within specific time frames for each program element. At other times a rapid response
is necessary to sample during specific oceanographic conditions or during "events", as
was the case of the Huntington Beach beach closure. It is critical that a vessel is readily
available for the District's OMP.
In addition to the direct cost of contracting and chartering a vessel, there are significant
internal administrative costs associated with securing a vessel for the ocean-monitoring
program. These costs are for time spent by ECM, Purchasing, and Accounting staff in
preparing bid proposals for contracted vessels, attorney contract evaluation, bid
evaluations, checking insurance coverage, purchase requisitions, approving invoices,
and paying contractors.
HOW DO WE COMPARE WITH OTHER AGENCIES?
There are three sanitation agencies in Southern California that have ocean monitoring
programs similar in size and scope to the District that were contacted to compare their
vessel operational needs. The agencies are Los Angeles County Sanitation District
(LACSD), the City of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego.
A ane Own/Contract #Vessels Len th ft.
LACSD Own 3 66 25 19
CI of LP, Own 2 85,65
San Diego Own 2 42.30
OCSD I Contract 4 39-65
PROJECTED VESSEL EXPENSES
Vessel Requirements
In an effort to eliminate our dependence on contracted vessels to conduct our ocean
monitoring, staff has conducted a work boat audit to determine the size of the boat and
equipment needed to best support the District's ocean monitoring program. We have
evaluated the pros and cons of the vessels we currently work with as well as those
operated by the City of LA, LA County, and San Diego.
G:MyA..,end.l dROan.R,N UW1B Id Agenda R¢pheN501111gn 13�I�.00een Ve11N Pu,efBlB.M
Rdvi.ed. g(1g9R Page 9
8
There are no "off the shelf'work boat designs in production that will fill the District's
needs. Work boats are typically designed for specific functions. This, however, doesn't
mean that we need to start from the costly design stage. There are boats being
manufactured for functions other than research that would provide us with a vessel of
adequate length and propulsion. Choosing a proven hull design and modifying the
superstructure to meet our monitoring requirements will significantly reduce overall
costs.
Staff has determined we would need a boat between 55- and 65-feet in length. It has to
be stable and properly equipped to deploy a variety of monitoring devices to complete
all elements of our monitoring program. The estimated cost of a vessel this size,
designed to our specifications and equipped with all the electronics for navigation,
would cost between $900,000 and $1.2 million (calculation is based on an industry
estimate of$15,000 to $20,000 per linear foot of vessel, using a 60-foot vessel).
Maintenance Costs
The City of San Diego budgets $50,000 per year for routine contract maintenance of the
two vessels. They indicated that most years they don't spend that amount. They have
exceeded $50,000 on occasion when they had to replace major mechanical systems.
Routine maintenance, per vessel, includes annual haul-out to clean and repaint the
bottom, $3,500 - $5,000; monthly in the water, hull cleaning, $1,000 - $1,500 per year;
oil and filter changes, engine tune up, hydraulic system maintenance, engine and wash
down pump maintenance, winch and mechanical cable service, battery service and
replacement, paint, etc. All of the maintenance is performed by the captain or is
contracted out. The City of San Diego OMP staff performs no maintenance work.
The City of San Diego also budgets $15,000 per year for fuel and has a contract with a
supplier. The cost of fuel for commercial use is less than that for recreational boats.
LACSD didn't provide fixed dollar figures but implied the yearly maintenance of the three
vessels is minimal, with the biggest expense being the annual haul-out($5,000)of the
66-foot boat. The captain and crew (2) are responsible for all the maintenance of the
three boats. Other agency maintenance personnel or contractors perform any
maintenance beyond the crews' capabilities.
Mooring Costs
Location: There are two harbors that are most suitable for mooring a District vessel,
Newport Harbor and Sunset/Huntington Harbor. Both are located within ten miles of
District's Plant 1 and Plant 2 facilities that minimizes staff travel time and allows rapid
transit to the District's offshore sampling area. Using other local harbors (e.g., Dana
Point and Long Beach)would significantly increase mobilization and transit time.
c%w deacagenclaaBnard Agenda Repcna@aol 2 mAgetla Rep sVnW,wem 43(Q ocean Vaud PdnN9ee.dcc
Ra"sad: Mew Page 10
_a
Mooring types: Three groups offer moorings that could be used by the District. These
are the County of Orange, the City of Newport Beach, and various private marina
operators. The two basic types of vessel moorings offered are slips and offshore "cans"
or moorings. With the need to load heavy gear, to have a freshwater source and
electricity, the cost of offshore cans was not evaluated.
County of Orange: The County has few slips available and none that would
accommodate a vessel 45-to 50-feet in length. These slips are used as guest slips for
very limited duration. They do offer offshore cans.
City of Newport Beach: Operates the Balboa Yacht Basin. Monthly slip fees are
$17.00/foot for vessels up to 50-feet in length and $20.00/foot for vessels over 50-feet
or$765 - $1,000. There is currently a two-year wait for slips.
Private Marina Operators: Several privately operated marinas are available. Monthly
slip fees range from $12.50—23.75 /foot or$600 - $1,000. Waiting lists for private
marinas are a minimum of one year.
Staff recommends submitting our name to the waiting list at the Balboa Yacht Basin
Marina until a slip is available. In the interim, we would secure a berth at another
marina. As mentioned above, the monthly fee would be about $1,000. This is the worst
case scenario, and it may be possible to reduce or eliminate the cahrges is n agreement
can be worked out with the City of Newport Beach.
Captain and Crew
Staff has conducted a survey of the City of San Diego, LACSD, and the City of Los
Angeles to determine how they captain their vessels. All have hired full time licensed
captains to operate their respective vessels. In addition, they have staff hired as crew
who help with the operation while at sea, and are qualified small boat operators. As
mentioned, all three agencies have two or three boats. The captain and crew are also
responsible for the maintenance of the boats.
The captain's responsibilities include the legal overall charge of the entire operation of
the vessel. Licensed personnel insure that they meet the minimum level of competency
and experience. The captain is ultimately responsible for the safety of the crew. On a
vessel, the size needed for our monitoring program, it is not unreasonable to expect the
captain to possess a thorough working knowledge of the vessel's mechanical systems
and possess the ability to perform maintenance to those systems.
The District has several options with regard to a vessel captain:
1) The District could hire a full time licensed captain to pilot the boat and perform the
routine maintenance similar to the operation of other agencies. Other District trade
persons or contractors would perform maintenance tasks beyond his expertise
%m A.a nfta n .rt�lmWrwsw Aeeuewwiwem i�nocevveaw w,uaxam
R�SM:� Page 11
P
2) The duties of captain and routine maintenance could be contracted out.
3) District personnel could be trained to obtain the U.S. Coast Guard operator's license.
(The cost of the training class is $850 and takes approximately 80 hours. (The U.S.
Coast Guard license fee is $250.) District personnel and contractors would perform
routine maintenance.
The District's Human Resources Division conducted a salary survey of other agency's
Boat Captain positions. The following summarizes their findings.
Agency Agency Job Salary Range Maximum Benefits Rate
Title Minimum
CSDLA Boat Captain $4 303 $5,346 36%
City of San Senior Boat 3,072 $3,665 30%
Diego Operator
City Of Los Fireboat Pilot $6,111 $6,810 30%
Angeles
County of Los Senior Rescue $5,089 $6,322 34.7%
Angeles Boat captain
Insurance
Other POTWs were surveyed with regard to how they insure their vessels. All are self-
funded.
The District's Finance Department obtained an estimate of what it would cost to insure a
60-111. vessel, if we were to go with an insurance carrier. They derived the following:
Limit Deductible Annual Premium
Vessel P81 $1 Million $2,500 $1,000
(Liability)
Jones Act Coverage $1 Million $2,500 $2,000
for Captain 8 Crew
Vessel Hull(Property) Value of vessel $10-$50 K 1.35%of vessel value
Based on a vessel value of$975,000 the total annual premium would be $16,162.
Financial Analysis
The District's Finance Division performed a cost analysis for a contract vessel versus
the cost of vessel ownership. The analysis uses a vessel purchase price of$975,000.
The estimated annual vessel operating cost is $162,762. Respective opportunity costs
(the loss of the 6% investment return)of$58,500 was added to determine the total
estimated cost.
As mentioned, the cost of chartering ocean-monitoring vessels will increase in the
future. We will employ the services of a larger, more stable vessel for the safety of the
crew and equipment.
Gb A4%g�\Baa,E ROeM RBNA51 lB Td ft..FeV�+`n-d` tweet 194O Vu Purtlufe.Ex
ftW�, a Page 12
Two scenarios are presented using costs per day of vessels that are capable of fulfilling
all Districts monitoring vessel needs. In the scenario the daily rate is $2,200. Scenario
one is based on the current usage and Scenario 2 is based on the projected needs.
The annual projected charter costs is $385,000 and $495,000, respectively. The
savings from ownership would range from $163,738 to$272,738. The pay back would
be 3.56 to 5.95 years.
Ocean Monitoring Vessel Purchase vs. Contract
Assumptions(Annualized)
Purchase Price: $975,000
Amortization period in years 20
Annual depreciation $48,750
Annual Cost
Fuel
Maintenance
Engine Maintenance $6,600
Clean and Paint $5,000
Normal Maintenance $10,000
Engine Rebuild$20,000 Q 5 year intervals $4,000
Total Maintenance $25,600
Salary& Benefits: (Captain) $94,000
Mooring cost $12,000
Insurance premium
Vessel P&I $1,000
Jones Act $2,000
Vessel Hull $13,162
Total Insurance $16,162
Estimated operating cost $162,762
Opportunity cost $58,500
Total estimated cost(excluding depreciation) $221,262
Projected contract cost for equivalent 175 days 225 days
Vessel: @$2,200/day $385,000 $495,000
Purchase vs. Contract Increase(Decrease)
Projected-Total estimated ($163,738) ($273,738)
Pay Back 5.95 years 3.56 years
Conclusion
It is recommended that management support the purchase of an ocean monitoring
vessel and that monies be budgeted for the design and construction. There are no "off
e:wv.emagea.�mem nomea sc UWIe dAw seooeOWIM.13l0.o nv ..n wrcnm.eoc
ae.xa: e�zase Page 13
r
Q
the shelf' monitoring vessels. However, there are vessels of similar design and function
that will closely match many of the Districts requirements. To move forward on this
recommendation staff suggests performing a thorough search of research vessels of
proven design in the specified size class. Once the field of acceptable vessels has
been narrowed down, we should employ the services of a naval architect to incorporate
our requirements into the design.
FO:wh:mcm
GAwp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports%2001 Board Agenda Reports\M1\Item 13(t).0cean Vessel Purunase.dw
G:lxyAWl WiMal rd Agwft ee..VW1 a MA .Wg MWtUh telg.p MVeasd PurNaW M
ee WM Page 14
OMTS COMMITTEE MeeangDate To8E.ofDir.
s121o1 s1310o1
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Numbe
OMTSOI-22 13(4)
Orange County Sanitation District _
FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Deirdre Hunter, Senior Environmental Specialist
SUBJECT: HUNTINGTON BEACH SHORELINE CONTAMINATION
INVESTIGATION, PHASE III, JOB NO. J-85, UPDATE
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the Board of Directors to:
(1) Approve a budget amendment of$1,575,000 for laboratory and miscellaneous
supplies, equipment, consulting service agreements, staff time and miscellaneous
contracts, and an additional $350,000 for AES Power Plant portion of studies, for the
Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85,
for a total project budget of$2,925,000;
(2) Authorize staff to seek reimbursement from AES Power Plant for $350,000;
(3)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts,
including those in excess of$100,000, with government agencies, universities,
consulting, equipment, supply, and service companies qualified to carry out those
contracts; and,
(4) Pledge that any and all necessary future funding for studies relating to said project
would be made available by the District.
SUMMARY
Staff has planned a series of integrated studies to look at whether the elevated bacteria
counts seen along portions of Huntington Beach during the previous two summers,
especially in the vicinity of the AES power plant, can be attributed to the District's
wastewater plume. Staff initially proposed a $1,620,000 budget for the project, although
only$1,000,000 was actually approved because of the way the recommendation was
crafted. In accordance with the Board's request, staff is continuing to seek external
funding sources. However, these monies will not be available before the studies are
scheduled to begin in May and resource commitments need to be made now.
Therefore, staff is requesting that the Board authorize the additional $1.575 million as
part of an overall not to exceed budget of$2.575 million. The OMTS Committee
approved this proposal in concept at the April 4, 2001 meeting.
DEH:wh
�'49dreWWMa1BaeN A9[^a Repp =018.e Apmda rt.p WW"Mm 13(1)HBeec
Page 1
fleneM'.40011�1:anrot(c )4aae11mm1
The first 24-hour receiving water study will be performed on May 21-22, 2001 and the +
moorings will be deployed by June. The contracts and supply purchases need to be
made in a very short timeframe. Therefore, staff is requesting that the General
Manager be given authorization to negotiate and award the necessary contracts
(including sole source contracts in excess of$100,000)to ensure that all the planned
studies can be performed this summer.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Approved budgeted amount is $1 million. This request if for an additional $1,575,000 to
cover upfront expenses while staff is continuing to search for funding.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Beginning in late fall 2000, staff began planning the studies needed to evaluate
Dr. Stanley Grant's (UCI) hypothesis that oceanographic processes along with an
interaction between the AES power plant in Huntington Beach could entrain and
transport bacteria to the beach from our ocean outfall discharge plume. During the
spring through fall of 2001, the District will conduct a series of integrated studies of the
offshore and shoreline waters, currents, and sediments off Huntington Beach to test the
hypothesis.
This month's update includes information on the following topics:
Background
• Funding Status and Update on Costs
• Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings
• Coordination of OCSD Investigation with Other Studies
Huntington Beach Shoreline Investigation Background
To be able to investigate the question regarding the potential that the District's plume
reaches the beach, staff has designed a series of studies with input from a Technical
Advisory Committee (TAG) and oceanographic consultants. The general objectives of
these studies are:
DEH:wh
G.�.ft%W.Eal Aaen.Rep QWI B W AWU RePe WWII.13(lft.do
Page 2
RewseO: ar5mi(vn):all]Nt(xn)a2]Nt(mm)
. Determine whether indicator bacteria are present in the nearshore region
between the District's deep-water ocean outfall and the shore;
. Determine if the District's outfall is a source for these bacteria; and
. Determine the oceanographic or meteorological mechanisms that can
transport the District's treated wastewater toward shore.
Funding Status and Update on Costs
At the February 2001 meeting, the Board approved a $1,000,000 budget for consulting
services to support the Huntington Beach summer Investigation surveys. The agenda
report, presentations, and verbal discussions at the Board meeting all referred to a
$1.62 million budget estimate. The General Manager's Recommendation did not
include the staff and supply costs as they were referenced in the text of the agenda
report and job plan. At the direction of members of the OMTS Committee, staff was
advised to seek outside funding and grants to support expenses in excess of the
approved $1 million. Although potential sources of funding are being pursued, they will
not be available in time for the summer studies. As cost-sharing money becomes
available, the District's costs may be reimbursed and applied to the cost of this project.
The five 46-hour and one 24-hour receiving water studies to be performed this summer
will require over 51,000 microbiological tests. As a result, staff must order about
$350,000 worth of materials from the supply houses. Two hundred seventy one
thousand dollars of microbiological media, sample bottles and bacteriological
quantification trays must be ordered from a single manufacturer, Idexx Corp. Idexx is
the only company that sells this bacteria rapid test method. Because of the volume of
supplies, the logistics of receiving the shipments, and the importance of receiving these
supplies in time for the first sampling event in May, an initial order has been placed with
Idexx under the General Manager's signature authority for approximately $99,000. This
amount is included in the total budget amount of$2.575 million.
Table 1 contains the most recent estimated project costs and the funding gap that staff
is requesting from the Board.
DEH:wh
G1M4eeYmWlBaad ABonJ RCW,sUdd1 B®Id A Vda RepG,51B'WWIM 1d9)XB dw
Page 3
PeNW:.2rod 1.�1:u9ro1(wnl amo11mm1
r
Physical Oceanographic Fieldwork.,June—September 2001 $1,000,000
Moorings
Analytical work.,October 2001 —June 2002
Receiving Water Quality May—September 2001 $ 800,000'
Measurements
Caged Mussel June 1 —September 30,2001 $ 125,000
Biomonitoring
Nearshore Sediments July-August 2001 $ 125,000
Data Mining On-going $ 150,000
Plume Modeling On-going $ 125,000
Data Analysis&Reporting October 2001 —June 2002 $ 250,000
Total Cost for Distrieft Studies $2,575,000
Approved Budget $1,000,000
Funding Gap ($1,675,000)
`This cost includes reimbursements to other the agencies for their participation in the study. The study is
logistically too large for the District to accomplish by itself. Although agencies will contribute as much in-
kind services as possible, the District may need to reimburse them for overtime and material costs.
Therefore, staff is requesting that the Board authorize the additional $1.575 million as
part of the overall $2.575 million. At the April 4, 2001 meeting of the OMTS
Subcommittee, this proposal was approved in concept.
Coordination of OCSD Investigation with Other Studies
The District is one of several institutions funding studies related to the Huntington Beach
pollution. Staff understands the importance of coordinating with the other agencies and
researchers to ensure the most integrated and clear understanding of the data. Listed
below is a brief description of the studies presently underway or being planned to
investigate the Huntington Beach shoreline contamination issue, the responsible
agency, and how the District sees its participation. Key participants include the County
of Orange (Public Facilities and Resources Department), UCI, AES and their
environmental consultant MBC Applied Environmental Sciences, USC SeaGrant,
National Water Research Institute, the Orange County Health Care Agency, the
Regional Water Quality Control Board, and possibly Scripps Institute of Oceanography.
County of Orange/ NWRI / UCI Santa Ana River Study
In December 1999 and May 2000, principal investigator, Dr. Stanley Grant,from
UCI performed extensive investigations at the mouth of the Talbert Marsh that
looked at the amount of bacteria that was contributed to the surfzone from
upstream stormwater pump stations and the marsh. A similar study of loadings to
the surfzone from the mouth of the Santa Ana River will be performed during the
summer of 2001. The District sends a representative to the regular coordination
DEH:wh
G.^aV.Me`aRna�BoaE Werd!IiGppItl3CUf 9mtlM�W Rero-l5050111iem t�l9�HBEc[
Page 4
aewea:esn1 MM:411701 p )4=1(mml
meetings sponsored by the County of Orange and UCI. The District will likely be
contributing microbiology services and/or materials to the Santa Ana River study.
The District will coordinate with the UCI group to ensure data collection is optimized
to provide information that can be used by other area studies.
USC SeaGrant Nearshore Process & Microbiological Studv
USC investigators Burton Jones, Jed Fuhrman, and Douglas Sherman will be
examining the contamination transport and concentration processes that occur in
the nearshore area, close to the AES power plant, during the summer of 2001. The
investigation will also include source tracking using a virus fingerprinting method.
The District will coordinate with the USC group to ensure data collection is
optimized to provide information that can be used by other area studies. The data
should be part of the overall understanding of the linkage between nearshore and
offshore processes. The District will be assisting USC with their investigation of
shoreline microbiology and nearshore receiving water conditions.
AES Power Plant/ MBC Applied Environmental Services Nearshore Processes Studv
The AES power plant currently has applied to California Energy Commission (CEC)
to increase its operating capacity. The CEC, the California Coastal Commission,
and the public have expressed concerns regarding the AES-OCSD plume
interactions. AES and its environmental consultant, MBC Applied Environmental
Services, is expected to perform monitoring in the nearshore area. AES and MBC
have attended coordination meetings in which their assistance was discussed. The
District will be presenting a proposal to AES that should include nearshore
moorings by Scripps, nearshore monitoring using MBC's boat, and tasks that
should help reduce the cost of the District's project by an amount yet to be
determined. These studies add a more thorough element that will help explain what
is occurring in the nearshore.
NWRI Source Tracking Methods Studv
One of the major dilemmas in solving the bacteria problems on Huntington Beach
and across the world is determining where the bacteria are coming from. Currently
there is no standardized bacteria source identification method. NWRI will be
funding a study to utilize various source-tracking techniques. The participants in
source-tracking investigations include Roger Fujioka from the University of Hawaii,
David White from the University of Tennessee, Harry Ridgway from the Orange
County Water District, Douglas Moore from the Orange County Health Care
Agency, and Dr. Stanley Grant and Sunny Jiang from UCI. These results can also
be compared with the results of USC's fingerprinting study and routine standardized
sampling methods for enterococci, total ooliform, and fecal coliform. The
researchers will be comparing whether the bacteria populations from the river,
marsh, surfzone station 9N, and the District's effluent are similar or different.
DEH:wh
G+xy.000penNt9aara Agee �`fitBwen npenaa Fepwlsw50Num INOWeaa
Page 5
n msm: 4WI(w J;4117ml(v )nrzwt(m )
Orange County PFRD / US Army Corns of Engineers (ACOE)
Understanding nearshore and shoreline transport mechanisms is also important in
maintaining sand on local beaches. Presently the County of Orange's Public
Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) and the ACOE are developing a
circulation sampling and modeling project for the lower reaches of the Santa Ana
River. The study is currently trying to secure funding and may start by fall 2001.
Through coordination efforts, the two studies' data can still be complementary.
Technical Advisory Committee
The District invited a group of individuals representing, local stakeholders, regulators,
academics, consultants, interested environmental groups, and the general public to
serve as independent reviewers of the Phase III study design. The TAC meetings also
ensure an open meeting process for the public and the press to observe the study's
progress and findings.
The final TAC meeting to review the draft workplan has been scheduled for
April 20, 2001 with the draft workplan due to the TAC by April 13, 2001.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
DEH:wh
G Yry.dWt enEa)Bw,E ppe gepyb�iB MMmM Regng ,,p 13101X8 Uoc
Page 6
Rerisea:amaf(vn):an7m11rm1a2Yrol I,mml
PDC COMMITTEE MeebngDad.or Do-.
s/vate To
/oI s1231
AGENDA REPORT ItemNumber [em4 lu(c)
Pm Nu b6 1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS REINVENTION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Sole Source Consulting Services Agreement with the Lewis Group for development
of the Capital Project Management Process Phase 2 for a total amount not to exceed
$308,000.
SUMMARY
In June 2000, the Engineering Department initiated an effort to improve project management
and project delivery practices. This effort is referred to as the Capital Project Management
Process (CPMP) Reinvention, and is planned as a three-phase project. The goal of the CPMP
Reinvention is to improve delivery of capital projects. The District's $1.5 Billion, 20 year
Capital Improvement Project (CIP) includes approximately$300M in design, project
management, and administration costs. Even a small improvement in project delivery
efficiency has the potential for significant savings.
Improvements to the CPMP include implementation of practices from the Project Management
Institute Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)that have been found to be
applicable to the District's projects. Phase 1, of the CPMP reinvention effort completed in
February 2001, assessed present procedures, defined the Orange County Sanitation District's
(District) project management requirements, and developed 37 specific recommendations for
improvements.
With Phase 1 completed, a Scope of Work has been developed for Phase 2. Phase 2 of the
CPMP Reinvention will develop an implementation plan for the 37 recommended
improvements, including development of customized written guidelines for project
management. Phase 3 will consist of implementation of the procedures developed in Phase 2,
including a training program. Full implementation of the reinvented CPMP is planned for a
two-year period.
Staff recommends awarding a Consulting Services Agreement to the Lewis Group for Phase 2
for a total fee not to exceed $308,000. This is a sole source recommendation based on the
Lewis Group's qualifications and excellent performance on Phase 1. The proposed fee was
negotiated with the Lewis Group based upon the Scope of Work developed in Phase 1.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Please refer to the attached Consulting Services Agreement Status Report.
G. yAUNgenda�mW Agenda aepma 01 sous Acme rtee WWI%ium 14(c)L rn.mc
aeaem:mom Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The proposed Consulting Services Agreement fee, not to exceed $308,000, is included in the
Engineering Department Joint Operating budget. The budget includes a total of$460,000 from
FY2000/01 through FY2001102 for Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Reinvention. -
The estimated expenditure for Phase 1 in FY2000/01 is $116,000, leaving $344,000 to
complete the project in FY2001/02.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The proposed CPMP Reinvention Phase 1 recommendations are based upon principles from
the Project Management Institute's Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). The
Project Management Institute (PMI) is an international organization fostering professionalism
and providing guidelines and education in the field of project management. The practice of
project management is a field distinct from engineering or other technical disciplines.
The intent of the Phase 2 implementation plan is to have the positive results listed below:
• Significant savings in project delivery costs.
• A standard project life cycle and project management methodology is used throughout the
Orange County Sanitation District (District).
• The Operations& Maintenance Department participates fully as partners and members of
the project organization.
• Project work is integrated with on-going District operations and asset management.
• Customer satisfaction is measured at a high level.
• Quality and risk management practices are incorporated into all projects.
• Projects are evaluated, controlled and managed proactively through project schedules and
budgets.
• A District-wide project management information system is operating.
• All capital projects are evaluated upon completion and the best practices and lessons
learned will be captured for inclusion in a reference file for future projects.
• Project management is established as a core professional competency in the District, and
is rewarded as such.
The proposed Phase 2 will form task forces including Staff from Engineering and other
departments that will be impacted by the 37 specific recommendations included in the Capital
Project Management Process (CPMP) Phase 1 Report. The task forces will work with the
Consultant to develop improved work processes to make improvements in the nine categories
below. Phase 3 will provide training for implementation of the improved processes. The
CPMP Reinvention process is planned for implementation over the next two years.
cx ftd sema�agedaa Rff xSVWI mad ng« da RepMa%OWI\Item ia(c).idx
k_n O: arz. Page 2
e Capital Project Process
Capital Project Planning
e Capital Project Scheduling
Capital Project Execution
a Project Manager Authority
Engineering Department Structure
e Engineering Department Planning
Engineering Department Talent
e Policies and Procedures
ALTERNATIVES
Not proceeding with Phase 2 of the CPMP Reinvention. If we do not proceed with Phase 2,
improvements to the District's project delivery may not be realized.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
1. Consulting Services Agreement Status Report
2. Consultant Proposal Letter for Phase 2 Services
AA.,jak:jo
G.wpAallagendelBoard Agenda Reporb2001 Board Agenda 11epens\0501U1em 14(c).Levas.doc
G.I. A .O RCCMS]001e ra Al-4.F,W'LsWWWM,.taauem6 Uoc
aa. . eaoAa Page 3
Consulting Services Agreement Status Report
Capital Project Management Process (CPMP), Phase 2
Total Project Budget: $460,000
Consultant: The Lewis Group
Start Date of Project: May 1, 2001
Accumulated
Date Addendum Description Cost Costs
Pending Original Develop implementation plans for the 37 $308,000 $308,000
Agreement recommendations from Phase 1, including
customization of written guides for project
management
Q p.AWWl UOBS 8 CONTRACTS\Spea.No.9900-181Consulling Service Slalus Repad Phase 2.doc 05/10/01
R.Ised 05114/98
THE LEWIS GROUP MEMO
165 Culver Boulevard,Playa del Ray,CA 90293 USA
PHONE(310)8V7 36M • FAX(310)827-OM • E-MAIL PeterCLawivOaoLc
TO: Jim Herberg
FROM: Peter C. Lewis
DATE: March 6, 2001
RE: Proposal for CPMP Phase 2
This document is our proposal for providing consulting service
to the Capital Project Management Process (CPMP) Project Phi se
2. We understand that the goal of Phase 2 is to further develo
and to establish implementation plans for the recommendation
that have been approved by the District from Phase 1.
As stated in the Scope of Work for Phase 2, we understand thak
our firm will be responsible to create each implementation pla�
and to gain its final approval. We understand that we shall
support the two steering committees, the seven task forces, anc�
numerous focus groups and interviews, as described in the Sco e
of Work.
Our estimated fees for the 274.50 consultant-days required foil
Phase 2 is $308,000.00, The breakdown is as follows:
a Implementation plans: $238,720.00 for 211.50 days
a Project management: $69,280.00 for 63.04 days
On the next page is a presentation of the estimated days that
our project team members will provide towards each
implementation plan and project management activity. The
primary assignments (R+) and estimated fees are also shown fbr
each line item.
THE LEWIS GROUP • MEMO PACE 1 of 2
"-'• � • .��a au.uP a.uuOLreOro lGW1S eKUW Ygtic UJ
Lewis Group Support for CPMP Phase 2
ASSIGNMENTS ESTIMATED DAYSyu�
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHASE 2 L.wl. s,Mlm Peuna. L.W. ss...s P.s.r.m TOTAL �s
CAPITAL PRCIECT PR Ess
ummfsbinN.m uvb.mm.georlCPN%.wRe
1 Sem.bswws�b•W rn.e Pam..��wa.r 1. 10
s smmim.e WUF a.mm�6b�b...R•0s1 1 A
AWI im.YAv�Nn t.
2 DaM...rtmw.l.m.Wlb•...rM R. 2W O.W O.W 2A0 32.aW.W
5 DW N rt PbN wA.Y.wmNw
r IW.MM64M1tlL.Oiwa+l
5 COV.Oi'OnbO.l b.wM.mNbn W�1mnr a.
.N.I.eb.�.pwn.rm e.Pw.b.u3. a.
CAPffAL PROJECT SCHEDULING
if vAgY94wbE.�bNpGeW I'm omI
.4nW u.Ybmbpbrr.ry0. 1 W .BtlO.
I C%P Nw MnN.bdnmN 7.00 2.W 0. .m 1 . W.
20�Immblm O.ibYW MPM.m Ie.m�Mb.n 2.W MW I O.W 2.W
a A1W Tlw Pence. M 1.W 3.W O.W I.W W.000.W
aBS pofbbN mbwnbe.bmw'm 7
5 Gbwm�mu+om.wb+M...wm.n 3. 0.
B SommY�e P®bnb�gbsu.pan 1. 2. .50 .1 .
T Msm.ygln.Pm.wr.. t.0 3. s.m
Tumnmwbbbaw ns.omia ROM
too I=.
om Oro 1.W 12 .W
3A0 0.W 3.W Sa.200.
0. O.ro .] �ro
1.W U.W .WT Te Me MANyYmn b,.vlry W D.W I D.W 1 0.75 .W
RI URE
,gopm.A�•Pe�.O.b 1%tJlmun+^ B.W S.W 2.W 16W
2 nee eb..q.mrm.nnam 3.ro a.W 1.W .W .LW.W
JENG
S vp.a Oury nnmm M I.W fi.W ,BBO.W
♦Ny.Wm.0 INI DEPARTMENT
DEP I
PIANNI
1e��viebmb•�..•W1��� ® fi.W I :m I O.W I
m.
W .OW.00
ENGINEERING DEPANIMENTTAIENT
.vrmy.e.cWbw blw.nOW Wrt M 3.W 1 SOD 1 000 1 J.W WOAD
3 T•.Mempm.bbpow..i. fi.W I.W 2.W 11. 12. %
I SANG qES
� b.P.,.mn.mblFA]�Nprm.e.wurmb W 1 3.W 3. 4.0
3 Tiemipu�laNnl.mbn.po.om NPasW'm � ),W 1.W I'm B.W 1 $W.W
TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DESIGN DAYS �.Td
PROJECT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
1 ma.m•.r th
flW 3.W 1W 1a.b.5a 1.25 1.n la. $11,ot0.W
3 Pi.Pa bevbr:.,ob. a.W I.W 1.W sW SS01W
2.W 2.W 9.W S0.]W.W
3.W I.W 10. 511.a L
2.W 0.W SOD 2.W $2,100.W
aro I.W 1.W q. fB.OW.W
TOTAL PRGIELT MANAGEMEM DAYS 30.11 ta.25 12.25 W. 200.
TOTAL PHASE 2 DAYS D
THE LEWIS GROUP • MEMO PAGE 2 Of 2
' PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Date TOM or .Dlr.
s1v�o1 s23to1
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number
_ PDC01-27 14 tl
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR MATERIALS
TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES,
SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-33BD
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall, Ninyo & Moore,
and Converse Consultants, to provide for materials testing, inspection, and
geotechnical engineering services for capital projects, Specification
No. PSA-2001-33BD, for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for each consultant
for July 2001/2002 ($240,000 total), with the option to renew for two additional
one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement for
July 2002/2003 ($390,000 total), and for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for
each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($300,000 total).
SUMMARY
Capital projects require materials testing and geotechnical engineering
consultation services for successful construction of the projects. Material testing
services include soils, concrete, asphalt, and metals testing. Geotechnical
engineering services may be required when unexpected or unusual soil
conditions arise. Geotechnical consultants have traditionally provided these
services for the District.
Staff has selected Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants to
provide materials testing and geotechnical engineering services to the District.
The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July
2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two
additional one-year periods at District's discretion.
The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-
needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the
following one-year period.
cawp.aaueenaa,eoa,a nv. m Reoana¢oo+scam nveaa Reponewwnuen,+a�a�svxoo+n.ax
RenaeP. 82098 Page 1
Services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing and ,
geotechnical engineering services will be charged to the project budgets.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each
consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the
proposed numbers by considering average testing hours of past years along with
present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects.
01/02 02/03 03/04 3-Year Total
Law/Crandall $80,000 $130,000 $100,000 $310,000
Nino & Moore $80,000 $130,000 $100,000 $310,000
Converse Cons. $80,000 $130,000 $10Q000 $310,000
Total per Year $240,000 $390,000 $300,000
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as
a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been
included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are
expensed as the services are used on the projects.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting
firms:
• Smith-Emery
• Ninyo & Moore
• Converse
• PSI
• NMG Geotechnical
• MTGL
• Harrington Geotechnical
• Leighton & Associates
• Law/Crandall
• Levine Fricke
Eight consultants responded, and District staff selected three of those firms for
recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide materials
G:1vq.E,..penMlBwU ApeMa PepwO IB rd ilpenN R.q.6WWIMMT I9(a)SP 1-M,aa
o.a..a: e @ Page 2
testing and geotechnical services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for
two additional one-year periods at District's discretion.
Six District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following
evaluation factors:
• Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point
score)
• Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score)
• Related service experience (point score)
• Prior work experience with the consultants
• Proposed fees
Staff is recommending Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants
to provide services to the District. These three firms received the highest
evaluation point scores and were ranked the highest with all evaluation factors
considered.
Leighton & Associates submitted a fair proposal and low fees for most often used
services. However, negative prior work experience with the consultant prompted
non-consideration for final selection.
MTGL received low scores for their proposal in the areas of related service
experience and applicable staff qualifications. Service experience did not include
wastewater projects. It centered mostly on small buildings and streets. Staff
qualifications were good for engineers. However, no qualifications were given for
field technicians, who will perform the majority of the testing work under this PSA.
See attachment "Materials Testing/Geotechnical Services Evaluation Summary"
for additional information.
ALTERNATIVES
The selection of three geotechnical firms to provide services to the District may
be changed.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Materials Testing/Geotechnical Services Evaluation Summary
MB:Ic
O:W.y.eWe•�e•Bwro Apmm Ropes WWI EWro PpeMs WMM•9Ytvlem Iele16Wlgt-JJ.eoc
Aom.ae:arsore, Page 3
Materials TestinglGeotechnical Services Evaluation Summary
5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board
Ninyo 6 M. Lew Gibbs Converse Leighton Hatdngton Smith E. PSI MTOL
Total Point Score 157 152 143 135 135 133 124 114
Fee Proposal of Most Often Used Services" $554 $532 $490 $408 $559 $553 $514 $583
Final Selection 2 1 3
Max.densbylooncrete compressive strength lab tests, soils compaction testing and inspection
G:1vq.tllelengVOSS a CONTRACTWItolls,Survey,E-Tasting Contracts FY 01-041.Soils\Shcs Evaluatlon Summary.dac
PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date TO so ar Dlr.
5/17101 5/23/01
AGENDA REPORT Item PDO01-28 Rem Nu)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING
SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-34BD
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS
Consulting, and Bush & Associates, to provide for surveying services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for an amount not to exceed
$120,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($360,000 total), with the option
to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed
$170,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($510,000 total), and for an
amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004 ($285,000
total).
SUMMARY
Capital projects require a variety of surveying services for successful
construction of the projects. These services include preliminary and construction
alignments, contractor's staking, pipe casing/tunnel survey, and pipeline heading
checks. Survey consultants have traditionally provided these services for the
District.
Staff has selected Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates
to provide surveying services to the District.
The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July
2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two
additional one-year periods at District's discretion.
The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-
needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the
following one-year period.
Surveying services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All
services will be charged to the project budgets.
c,wp dta`age dmBdmm Agenda Reppda=l Bpmd Agenda ReWm05dnI,em 14(e).BP3W bN da
Ra.W .. Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each
consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the
proposed numbers by considering average survey hours of past years along with
present survey fees and scheduled future capital projects.
01/02 02/03 03104 3-Year Total
Bell Land Survey. $120,000 $170,000 $95,000 $385,000
MDS Consulting $120,000 1170,000 $95,000 $385,000
Bush & Assoc. $120,000 $170,000 $95,000 $385,000
Total per Year $360,000 $510,000 1 $285,000
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as
a lump sum item. Surveying funds have been included in the individual project
budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are
used on the projects.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting
firms:
• MDS Consulting
• Forked Engineering & Surveying
• DGA Consultants
• Bell Land Surveying
• Bush & Associates
• Thomas A. King
Five consultants responded, and District staff selected three of those fines for
recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide surveying
services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year
periods at District's discretion.
Six District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following
evaluation factors:
G:wq.ata�dA RepwisV.l0 do d.gepylSASpTIkm tn�el sv:ow-x.aoc
R..W ... Page 2
• Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point
score)
• Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score)
• Related service experience (point score)
• Prior work experience with the consultants
• Proposed fees
Staff is recommending Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush &
Associates to provide surveying services to the District. These three firms
received the highest evaluation point scores and were ranked the highest with all
evaluation factors considered.
Forkert Engineering & Surveying did not meet required qualifications for field
personnel.
DGA submitted a fair proposal and low fees. However, staffing difficulties for the
new PSA and negative prior work experience with the consultant prompted non-
consideration for final selection. See attachment"Survey Services Evaluation
Summary"for additional information.
ALTERNATIVES
The selection of three surveying firms to provide services to the District may be
changed.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Survey Services Evaluation Summary
Ma:lc
G:Wadb`apeM•EoaE Age Reow la MAp a 2epmuWWMM ta(e),SMOLx.a
Aa„: mzasa Page 3
Survey Services Evaluation Summary
5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board
Bell Bush MDS I Dc ForkM
Total Point Score 153 136 135 129 103
Fee Proposal of Most Often Used Services 1 $635 1 $496 $555 $460 $518
Final Selection 1 1 1 2 1 3
G.I"dlawguom 8 CONTFACTSl oils,Survey,ETesling Contracts FY 01.041 urvey\Survey Evaluallon Summary.dw
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TaBe.arrnr.
s1vro1 s1231
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
P0001-29 14(n
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL
ACCEPTANCE TESTING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION
NO. PSA-2001-35BD
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreements with Power Systems Testing Co. and
Electro Test Inc., to provide electrical acceptance testing services for capital
projects, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for an amount not to exceed
$70,000 for each agreement for July 2001/2002 ($140,000 total), with the option
to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed
$150,000 for each agreement for July 2002/2003 ($300,000 total), and for an
amount not to exceed $175,000 for each agreement for July 2003/2004
($350,000 total).
SUMMARY
Capital projects require extensive electrical acceptance testing for successful
completion of the projects. Testing procedures follow the National Electrical
Testing Association's (NETA)Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electric
Power Distribution Equipment and Systems. Some of the equipment tested
includes transformers, circuit breakers, and motors.
On past capital projects the prime contractor was generally required to perform
electrical testing. The District has decided to modify that approach and work
directly with NETA-certified testing firms to accomplish acceptance testing for
increased quality assurance.
Staff has selected Power Systems Testing Co. and Electro Test Inc. to provide
electrical acceptance testing services to the District.
The Professional Services Agreements will be structured to cover the July
2001/2002 period, with the option for renewal with each consultant for two
additional one-year periods at District's discretion.
ckgdia�genga�W nyenm Repaultom Boom Ag�ds aepw MIVIem 14(f1. 4IX11 XAM
R . Wma Page 1
i
The proposed yearly PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-
needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of each year will not carry over to the
following one-year period.
Electrical acceptance testing services are budgeted on each capital project as
required. All testing will be charged to the project budgets.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Amounts as shown in the table below are proposed PSA allocations for each
consultant for the next three years, starting in July 2001. Staff derived the
proposed numbers by considering average testing hours of past years along with
present electrical testing fees and scheduled future capital projects.
01/02 02/03 03104 3-Year Total
Power Systems 1 $70,000 $150,000 $175,000 $395,000
Electro Test $70,000 $150,000 1 $175.000 $395,000
Total per Year $140,000 1 $300,000 1 $350,000
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as
a lump sum item. Electrical testing funds have been included in the individual
project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services
are used on the projects.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In February 2001 the District solicited proposals from the following consulting
firms:
• Electro-Test Incorporated
• Brar Electrical Systems
• Power Systems
• Applied Engineering Concepts
Three consultants responded, and District staff selected two of those firms for
recommendation to the Board of Directors. Each firm will provide electrical
testing services for July 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional
one-year periods at District's discretion.
G:Wq.NN0 a�0N Aq .ee�=01B WN--ftg-Wllhlm 10)sP3001d5 a«
n.WW1 Wme Page 2
Five District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following
evaluation factors:
• Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point
score)
• Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score)
• Related service experience (point score)
• Prior work experience with the consultants
• Proposed fees
Staff is recommending Electro-Test Incorporated and Power Systems to provide
electrical acceptance testing services to the District. Brar Electrical Systems
could not provide the required NETA-certified technicians or registered electrical
engineers for field personnel, prompting non-consideration for final selection.
Power Systems received the highest evaluation point score. Electro-Test
Incorporated received a lower evaluation score on their proposal. However, after
interviewing the firm and considering several years of positive prior work
experience with the consultant, District staff decided to select the company. See
attachment "Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary"for additional
information.
ALTERNATIVES
The selection of two electrical testing firms to provide services to the District may
be changed
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary
MBAc
B"NWWEa�AgO6t�SUGOI BMW A9WM Be[gt4 IMMe 14(1. O135.E=
a"„x„ � Page 3
Electrical Testing Services Evaluation Summary
5/10/01 PDC, 5/23/01 Board
Electro-Test Power Systems Bmr Electric
Total Point Score 47 89 61
Fee Proposal (Summation of Hourly Rates) 1 $3 741 1 $3 665 $3,563
Final Selection 1 2 1 1
G:xp.dtaletgVOBS a CONTRACTS1SdIs,Sumy,E-TWl g Contracts FY 01.041Electrlcal Testing Services Evaluation Summery.tloe
PDC COMMITTEE Meetingoate Toea.orwr.
s/Riot siz iol
AGENDA REPORT item Number Item 601
Orange County sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER
SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Ratify Change Order No. 8 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer
System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc.,
authorizing an addition of$23,722 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total
contract amount to $8,810,056.56, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 9 for an
adjustment of Engineer's Quantities authorizing an addition of$90,780,
increasing the total contract amount to$8,900,836.56 and (3) Accept
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract
No. 3-38-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and
approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 8 includes 3 items of added work and one credit item to
Contract No. 3-38-1. There is a 27 calendar day time extension associated with
this change order. Change Order No. 9 is for the adjustment of Engineer's
Quantities. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750 per day and there are
no bonus provisions.
Contract Start Date May 18, 1999
Original Contract Completion Date November 27, 2000
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 9
Current Contract Completion Date March 4, 2001
Actual Completion Date February 5, 2001
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $8,363,796.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 422,538.56
This Change (CO No. 8) (add) $ 23,722.00
This Change (CO No. 9) (add) $ 90,780.00
Change Orders to Date $ 537,040.56
Percentage Increase to Date 6.42%
Final Contract Price $8,900,836.56
weaawaunwe mamaenea,Roam R,e O Re.ft o019oam 1 a�at cm
Reonee: B12098 Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Section 8, Page 27)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Please refer to the attached Budget Information Tables
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Contract No. 3-38-1, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Reach 1, includes the installation of 15,933 feet of sewer pipe, manholes, and
appurtenant facilities in the City of Buena Park, and along the Caltrans right-of-
way in Beach Boulevard. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and
specifications and the contract was awarded on April 28, 1999 to Fleming
Engineering, inc. The contract is now complete.
The following summarizes Change Order No. 8
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Shoring and excavation for two $ 15,120 0 Other
sewer lateral bores.
2 Delays attributed to bypass $ 21,598 15 Other
anoroval
3 Compensible delay costs $ 20,574 0 Changed
associated with CO No. 7 Condition
4 Credit for realignment on $(33,570) 10 Changed
Beach Boulevard Condition
6 Time extension for inclement $ 0 2 Other
weather
Total Change Order No. 8 1 $ 23,722 1 27
The following summarizes Change Order No. 9
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Adjustment of Engineer's $90,780 0 Other
Quantities
Total Change Order No. 9 $90,780 0
ALTERNATIVES
None
WeaNCalal\p EaraBa^Ca\Bowrtl ABe^tla Repa^srN01 Bantl AgenEa ReOo^s`L501\Item Id(81.3361 Eps
Reasetl'. fl209B Page 2
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan.
The final EIA was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was
fled on July 20, 1989.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order No. 8
4. Change Order No. 9
BP:lc
vve.mmviwy.ev,�ma.eoamapnee neoon»aoi eam nemaa neemeawix.,,,ialal Me ldc
+� a Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH I
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1
-p w
AUTHORIZED AUTHO
' E E
E
�L WN
Project Development $20,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6.000.00 $6,000.00 $5.934.00 99%
Studies/PenlUing $10,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.0 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $23,973.00 100%
Consultant PSA $300,000.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $188,710.00 $181.938.00 96%
Design Staff $153,000.00 $276.000.00 $276,000.00 $276.000.00 $276.000.00 $260.491.001 94%
Constmction Contract $4,308,000.00 $8,786.334.56 $114.502.00 $8.900,836.56 $8.786.334.56 $114,502.00 $8,900,836.56 $8,786,230.001 99%
Construction
Administration $100.000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $331,000.00 $241.304.001 73%
Construdon
Inspection $120,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $676,700.00 97%
Contingency $914.000.00 $376,955.44 -$114.502.00 $282.453.44
PROJECT TOTAL $5,925,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,312,044.56 $114.502.00 $10,426,546.56 $10,176,570.00 98%
lReimbumable Costs I
1PROJECT NET 1 $5,925,000,001 $10,689.000.001 1 $10,689,000.001" 1 $10.312.044.661 $114.502.001 $10,426.546.561 $10,176,670.001 —.—.Tl
g"dwWnglm"NwntW$ -38-1%udpdablew0.9
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 5/18/99 $ 8,363,796.00 $ 8,363,796.00 560 560
CO NO. 1' 10/20/99 $ 21,475.00 $ 8,385,271.00 0.26 0 560
CO. NO. 2' 12/20/99 $ 46,685.00 $ 8,431,956.00 0.81 7 567
CO. NO. 3' 1/26100 $ 30,830.81 $ 8,462,786.81 1.18 4 571
CO. NO. 4 4126/00 $ 130,622.00 $ 8,593,408.81 2.75 26 597
CO. NO. 5' 07/07/2000 $ - $ 8,593,408.81 2.75 0 597
CO.NO.6" 9M4/00 $ 77.952.00 $ 8,671,360.81 3.68 15 612
CO.NO7 328101 $ 114,973.75 $ 8,786,334.56 5.05 18 630
CO.NO. 8 Pending $ 23,722.00 $ B,810,056.56 5.34 27 657
CO. NO. 9 Pending $ 90,780.00 $ 8,900,836.56 6.42 0 657
'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23
"Approved by PDC per delegated authoray by Board Resolution 99-23
gAvpdta/englobs and contracts/3-38.1/costatusreport8-9
j Page 1 of 5
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eloht (8)
Date: May 23. 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No, 3.38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
Amount of this Change Order(Add) $23 722.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —SHORING AND EXCAVATION FOR TWO SEWER LATERAL BORES
This item is reimbursement for installation costs for two sewer lateral bores added to the project by
Addendum No. 1. However, the work was not included in the contract Schedule of Prices. The added
work was for two additional 8-inch sewer laterals installed in 24-inch steel casings under Beach
Boulevard at Station Nos. 78+80 and 79+20. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 47)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,120.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TI EM 2—DELAYS ATTRIBUTED TO BYPASS APPROVAL
This item is for extra labor, equipment, and overhead costs for standby time between June 14, 2000 to
June 28, 2000. District Staff required that additional details be provided for all bypass plans to be used
for the balance of the project. The details required that the Contractor develop a spill contingency plan,
investigate the flow conditions in the existing trunk sewers, and confirm the duration of low and high
flow periods. This item does not include any direct costs for development and implementation of
bypass plans, but is exclusively for delay costs. The Contractor was not allowed to continue work until
a comprehensive bypass plan was submitted and approved. This work was accomplished by the
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference
Impact Notice No. 47).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,598.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 5
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92723.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eight (8)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
ITEM 3—COMPENSIBLE DELAY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGE ORDER NO. 7
A general note in Change Order No. 7 stipulated that "all change order items which include time
extensions, may be adjusted for compensible delay costs in a future change order. Change Order
No. 7 included eight items with a total time extension of 18 calendar days. During Change Order No. 8
negotiations, it was determined that the aforementioned days should be categorized as excusable
compensable delays. District Staff negotiated a daily-extended field site overhead rate and applied it to
the subject 18 calendar days. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact No.47)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,574.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4 -CREDIT FOR REALIGNMENT ON BEACH BOULEVARD
The existing contract alignment, located in the outside No. 3lane represented a potential public safety
problem. Caltrans expressed their concems with equipment movement encroaching into the No. 2
lane during mainline construction. District Staff and the Design Consultant reevaluated the design
alignment between Station Nos. 76+26 and 97+73 and concluded that it would be beneficial to all
parties to modify the alignment. Plan Change No. 7 was initiated to move the alignment into the No. 1
fast lane to provide more installation space and maintain Caltran's required safety clearance to the
traveling public. In addition, the Contractor would realize cost savings due to the elimination of steel
plating or same day base paving, increased productivity due to the added workspace, relocation away
from an existing parallel sewer, and elimination of bypass pumping. This item includes ten days of
excusable compensible delays, which equals $11,430. As a result, the District negotiated a net credit
item with the Contractor. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 7)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($33,570.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 5
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.0 No. Eiaht (8)
Date: May 23 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
ITEM 5—TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER
This item is to adjust the time of completion based on 32-days of inclement weather to date.
Total inclement weather days to dale: 32 Calendar Days
Contract inclusive weather days: 12 Calendar Days
Inclement weather days granted to date: 18 Calendar Days
Contract time extension: 2 Calendar Days
This item is in compliance with Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 7 of the
Construction Agreement.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $23,722.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 27 Calendar Days
t
Page 4 of 5
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Eight (8)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 27 day extension of
time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: May 18, 1999
Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: November 27 2000
Time Extension this C.O.: 27 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 97 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 657 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 4, 2001
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA
Actual Final Completion Date: February 5, 2001
Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 422,538.56
This Change (Add) (DedUGt) $ 23, 722.00
Amended Contract Price $ 8,810,056.56
a
Page 5 of 5
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Fleming Engineering. Inc. C.0 No. Eight (8)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Enaineerino
Board Acceptance Date: May 23, 2001
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC.
Contractor Date
J
Page 1 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Nine (9)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
Amount of Change Order(Add) $90,780.00
In accordance with contract provisions the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Item No Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
8. V.F. 84-inch ID MH 633 650.00 17.00 $1140.00 $19,380.00
14. L.F. Slurry Fill Abend.
Sewer Pipe 4,326 5120.00 794.00 30.00 23,820.00
16. L.F. 8-inch VCP Sewer 100 285.00 185.00 372.00 68,820.00
Subtotal $112,020.00
DEDUCTIONS
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
4. L.F. 39-inch VCP 1990 1975.00 15.00 $ 316 $4,740.00
17. C.Y. Crushed Rock
Bedding 0-12" 500 225.00 275.00 20 5,500.00
18. C.Y Crushed Rock
Bedding 12-24" 500 0,00 500.00 22 11 000.00
Subtotal $(21,240.00)
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $90.780.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
L
Page 2 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Flemina Engineering Inc. C.0 No. Nine (9)
Date: May 23 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time
to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor,
except as expressy granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: May 18, 1999
Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: November 27 2000
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 97 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 657 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 4, 2001
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA
Actual Final Completion Date: February 5, 2001
Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 446,260.56
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 90,780.00
Amended Contract Price $ 8,900,836.56
I Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Fleming Enaineerina. Inc. C.O No. Nine (9)
Date: May 23. 2001
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1
Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina
Board Acceptance Date: May 23, 2001
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC.
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dae TOBtl.Of Dir.
sn7101 5/23/01
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
_ PDC01-33 19 h
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer
SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT 2,
JOB NO. J-66
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing a credit of$2,692
and a time extension of 290 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount
to $943,308.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 1 includes one item of added work and one credit item for a
design change to Job No. J-66. There is one omission and no errors associated
with this change order. Liquidated damages on this job are $500 per day and
there are no bonus provisions.
Contract Start Date September 18, 2000
Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1
Current Contract Completion Date December 31, 2001
Actual Completion Date N/A
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) ($ 2,692.00)
Change Orders to Date 0.00
Percentage Decrease to Date (0.28%)
Amended Contract Price $ 943,308.00
OIeadWalallndlaWqendsew,d Agerda FeWISWOl B MAgentftp SWW"Ilem N(h)J Wdoc
ft.. W. Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This project is for the construction of a new meter vault and the installation of a
new flowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall at Plant No. 2. Tran Consulting
Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded
to Urbantec Engineers, Inc on June 28, 2000. The contract is now 4% complete.
The completed work includes excavation and relocation of a six-inch and a
four-inch gas lines and additional work as described in Item 1 of this Change
Order.
The following summarizes Change Order No. 1
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Relocate Gas Lines $7.108 0 Omission
2 Install Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Per ($9,800) 290 Design Change
Revised Drawings
Total Change Order No. 1 ($2,692.00 290
Item No. 2 is for costs to install the flowmeter per the revised design. During
construction, unknown subsurface soil conditions combined with the review of
shoring, pipe support, and dewatering submittals revealed concerns of potential
settlement to the adjacent standby oulfall pipe.
Due to the critical nature of this project and the serious consequences of a failure
to the District's main effluent discharge pipe, staff hired a team of experts to
review the contractors methods of construction. The team consisted of
Engineers familiar with the original oulfall installation, Geotechnical and
Structural Engineers and a Construction consultant. The review team along with
District staff, reviewed the contractor's procedures for dewatering, shoring, and
temporary pipe supports for the 120-inch pipe and concluded that there was a
potential for the adjacent standby-ouffall pipe to settle significantly during
construction of this project due to the existing soils and groundwater conditions.
The standby outfall pipe bedding had changed significantly since its original
installation due to continual ocean tidal actions.
G radr dWbgendraBoard Agenda ReMddV00i Board Agenda RedraaW W IDiem Ngh),J£fi.eoc
Reward: .,2.B Page 2
r
Since both outfall pipelines are critical to District's operations, staff decided to
redesign the entire structure to minimize risk. The redesign eliminated the need
to excavate below the main outfall pipe and reconfigured the entire access
structure. The decision to discontinue construction of design and to redesign the
facility was discussed with the PDC in the April 2001 meeting.
Summary of Change Order No. 1, Item No.2 Costs
Description Costs
Work Completed to Date (Relocation of
Gas Lines) $ 38,000
Total Contractor's Costs for Redesigned $898,200
Work*
Total Cost $936 200
Original Contract Amount $946,000
Net Credit $9,800
Costs for work completed to date includes relocation of gas lines as required in
the original contract, but does not include costs for the redesigned work.
'Breakdown of the Contractor's total cost for the redesigned work is as follows:
Redesigned Work $809,200
Submittal Preparation Costs for Original Design $ 36,000
Equipment Rental Loss $ 25,000
Contractor's Office and Field Overhead ( 290 Days) $ 28,000
Total contractor's costs for the redesigned work $898,200
The Engineer's estimate for the redesign is $ 742,300 and does not include costs
for submittal preparation, equipment rental loss, and contractor's office and field
overhead.
ALTERNATIVES
The alternative of terminating the existing contract and rebidding the new design
was discussed with the PDC in April 2001 and staff was directed to proceed with
the execution of a change order to the existing contract for the redesigned work.
Terminate Contract and Rebid
Description Cost
Work Completed to Date $ 38,000
Termination Costs" $ 156,440
In-house staff labor and misc. costs to rebid the
project $ 8,000
Estimated Low Bid En insei's Estimate $ 742,300
Total Cost
$944 740.00
Original Contract Amount $ 946,000
G:W.wawnm,ew,eAg. A.w =,Bova AWN fto MIV.14,j e.e
'a,.w:amne Page 3
r
Net Credit $ 1,260 v
"Breakdown of the termination costs is as follows:
Mobilization and Demobilization Costs $ 47,300
Bonds and Insurance Costs $ 39,840
Overhead and Profit $ 33,300
Submittal Preparation Costs for Original Design $ 36,000
Total $156,440
CEQA FINDINGS
This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan.
The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of
Determination was filed on October 29, 1999.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order
UM:dm
G:Mp A.".d.�MMdnda Reµhn=lB M AMde lieporlYMM\Ilem 14(h).JE .A
ad„W. Wrz Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT
JOB NO. J-66
.. ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOR12ED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE _REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $
Design Staff $ 45.000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 5 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 100%
Consultant PSA $ 57,200 $ 82,200 $ 82,200 $ 82,200 $ 82.200 $ 63,000 77%
Construction Contract $ 514.000 $ 946.000 $ - $ 946,000 $ 946,000 $ (2,692) $ 943,308 $ 38,000 4%
Construction(Other) $ 27,000 $ 27.000 $ - $ 27.000 $ 27.000 $ - $ 27,000 $ 24,000 89%
r
Construction Staff $ 135,700 $ 135,700 $ - $ 135,700 $ 135,700 $ - $ 135,700 $ 85.000 63%
Contingency $ 145,100 $ 120,100 $ - $ 120,100 $
TOTAL 1 $ 924,000 1 $ 1,356,000 $ - $ 1,356,000 .' $ 1,235,900 $ (2,692) $ 1,233.208 $ 255,000 1 21
GAw,dlabN%JOBB a CONTRACTSb66%Comladion Menepemanl File.%Che *0M.MjC0181T.A.101sWt.
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT
JOB NO. J-66
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TIME TAO'DATE
CONTRACT 06/28/2000 $ 946,000 $ 946,000 180 180
CO NO. 1 Pending $ (2,692) $ 948,308 -028% 29.0 470 .
GM dMB QIJOBS 6 CONTMCT�m wn Mvnepumnl F,W.%CMnq 0rdvrsgC0I SMNS b xlg6 lI
Page 1 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2 Job No. J-66
Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers
Amount of this Change Order(Ad9)(Deduct) $2( 692.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions
from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - RELOCATE GAS LINES
This item is for labor, material, and equipment to relocate an additional 60 feet of six-inch and
four-inch gas lines. During construction, soil borings revealed gravel below the existing 120-inch pipe.
The presence of gravel below the pipe was not shown on the contract drawings. Based on this new
information, it was decided to extend the limits of the structure's excavation to ensure proper support
of the 120-inch pipe during construction. Therefore additional lengths of gas lines had to be relocated
to accommodate the increase in excavation limits. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change
Order No. 1 and Urbantec's Letter Dated October 6, 2000.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,108.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - INSTALL OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER PER REVISED DRAWINGS
This item includes costs to install the outfall Fowmeter per the revised drawings issued by the District.
During the construction phase of this project, unknown sub surface soils conditions combined with the
review of shoring, temporary pipe supports, and dewatering submittals revealed concerns of potential
settlement to the adjacent standby outfall pipe. On December 22, 2000 the contractor was directed to
stop work to enable the District to reevaluate the unknown subsurface conditions. A redesign was
completed by the District and issued to the contractor as Plan Change No. 1. This change order item
includes deletion of work not completed in the original contract, addition of the new redesign work, and
costs due to delays.
Change Order Item Summary:
Original Contract Work Not Completed $908.000.00
Redesign Costs (Plan Change No. 1) $898,200.00
Net Credit $ (9,800.00)
Page 2 of 4 9
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66
Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers
This change order item is on the critical path of this project and a time extension of 290 days is
necessary for the District to evaluate the contractor's shop drawings, redesign the project, and
negotiate change order costs with the contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2a of the General Provisions. Reference Plan Change No. 1 and
Urbantec's Letter Dated March 28, 2001.
CREDIT FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($9,800.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 290 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($2,692.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 290 Calendar Days
f Page 3 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1)
Date: May 23, 2001 -
Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66
Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers
The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by
this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 290 day extension
of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly
granted and approved by this change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001
Time Extension this C.O.: 290 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 290 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 470 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 31, 2001
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (2,692.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 943.308.00
Page 4 of 4
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:One (1)
Date: May 23, 2001
Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66
Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers
Board Authorization Date: May 23, 2001
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Recommended by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
Urbantec Engineers, Inc.
Contractor Date
GBwp.dta\engUOBS&CONTRACTSU-66\Construction Management Files\Change 0ndws\C01 5-23-01.doc
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dare To Btl.or Dir.
5/17/01 5/23/01
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PDCOL-34 14(I)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Kelly Lew, Contract Project Manager
SUBJECT: NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER PROTECTION
PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 11-14R
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Establish a budget of$144,000 for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer
Protection Project, Contract No. 11-14R.
SUMMARY
The Newland Street Interceptor Sewer was built in 1981. The sewer consists of
a 48-inch pipe crossing under the Huntington Beach Channel.
The County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department(PFRD) owns
the right-of-way and prior rights to the Huntington Beach Channel. PFRD is
proceeding to widen and deepen this channel. This construction project requires
that Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) construct a bridge-type concrete
encasement to protect the existing sewer pipe. The proposed sewer protection
project has an estimated cost of$144,000.
PFRD will design the sewer protection plans and specifications and will add them
to their bid package. PFRD will administer both projects in one construction
contract.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total budget estimate for the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection,
Contract No. 11-14R is $144,000. Authorization of$6,000 for project
development, $1,000 for studies/permitting, and $12,000 for design staff is being
requested. This project was not known at the time the FY2000/01 budget was
finalized. The requested authorization will allow OCSD staff personnel to monitor
the construction of the job by PFRD.
See the attached Budget Information Table for more information.
Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT `
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The project is not currently budgeted. This budget request will allow for the
protection of the Newland Street Interceptor Sewer where it crosses the
Huntington Beach Channel. This budget request includes $6,000 for project
development, $1,000 for studies/permitting, $12,000 for design staff, $60,000 for
a construction contract, $26,000 for construction administration, $21,000 for
construction inspection, and $18,000 for project contingencies. A budget
breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) is
preparing a Reimbursement Agreement for OCSD to reimburse PFRD for the
construction of this project. PFRD has prior rights to the land where the existing
flood control channel resides. OCSD has an easement and license agreement
from PFRD to operate and maintain the sewer line in PFRD right-of-way.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives for this sewer protection work. By
coordinating the two projects together with each other, there will be less
inconvenience and cost to the public.
CEQA FINDINGS
PFRD is handling the CEQA documentation for this project.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
KNL:jak
G:\wp.dta\agenda0oard Agenda Repor1s0001 Board Agenda Reports\0501\Item 14@.11.14R.doc
Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Newland Street Sewer Protection
CONTRACT NO. 11.14R
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED rPROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTMASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ 6.000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 0%
Studies/Permitting $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1.000 $ 1,000 0%
Consultant PSA 0%
Design Staff $ 12,000r$ 26.000
00 $ 12000 $ 72,000 0%
Construction Contract $ 60,00000 0%
Construction
Administration $ 26,000 0%
Construction
Ins eclion $ 21,00000 0%
Contin enc $ 18.00000 0%
PROJECT TOTAL $ - $ - $ 144,000 $ 144,000 $ - $ 19,000 1 $ 19,000 1 $ 0%
Reimbursable Costs
PROJECT NET 1 $ - $ - $ 144,000 1 $ 144.000 1 $ - $ 19,000 1 $ 19,000 1 $ 0%
g0wp dta%eng02atnal,aye\t 1-14nl 1.14r Budget Table
Form Revised Oct.4,2000
`w
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Wednesday, May 9, 2001, 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on May 9, 2001 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT:
Shirley McCracken, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager
Mark Leyes,Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Shawn Boyd Bob Doter, Director of Operations &
John M. Gullixson Maintenance
Roy Moore Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Joy L. Neugebauer Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager
Jerry Sigler Jeff Reed, Human Resources Supervisor
James W. Silva Mike White, Controller
North Eckenrode, Board Chair Greg Mathews,Asst.to the General Manager
Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Arosteguy
Chuck Lee
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Flanagan
Richard Castillon
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Mark Esquer
Steve Filarsky Jon Thomsic
Toby Weissert Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the April 11, 2001 Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting.
Director Jerry Sigler abstained.
J
Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 2
May 9, 2001
(S) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson reported on ocean discharge issues and the possible impacts of changing the level
of treatment to the District's wastewater.
Tom Flanagan and Lisa Arosteguy gave a brief presentation on the Leadership Training Program
and its goals for the District's management team.
A presentation was then given by Greg Mathews and Chuck Lee on the SPMT PBECC (Performance
Based Evaluation and Compensation Committee), outlining the philosophical approach the
committee had developed and requested guidance and confirmation their approach was in line with
what the Board of Directors wanted. Directors requested the committee make a presentation when
additional details are available.
(7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
The Director of Finance referred the Directors to a hand-out outlining the various insurance
policies currently in effect. He briefly reported on the earthquake insurance program and asked
for Directors'Input in the consideration of canceling the program for next year. A full report
would be made to the FAHR Committee members in June.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources was not present.
(9) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
The Communications Manager, Lisa Lawson, reported on outreach activities the District has
been involved with. The District held its first open house on May Vh, in conjunction with the
Orange County Water District and the Municipal Water District of Orange County, and had
approximately 300 people attending throughout the day. The District also had a booth at the
annual Children's Drinking Water Festival.
Ms. Lawson then advised she would be attending all committee meetings through the summer
due to the ocean discharge Issues. She reported that a public opinion research telephone
survey would be conducted,which would assist in developing the education to be Included in the
communication outreach. She also requested Directors to advise staff if they know of any group
that might be interested in teaming about ocean discharge issues.
(10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel had no report.
V
Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
May 9, 2001
(17) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:37 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Sections 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1)and (2). Confidential
Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section
54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes
of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
At 7:35 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
a. FAHR01-25: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2001.
b. FAHR01-26: Receive and file Certificate of Participation(COP) Monthly Report.
C. FAHR01-27: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of April 26, 2001.
d. FAHR01-28: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive, file and approve the
Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2001.
e. FAHR01-29: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly
Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2001
through March 31, 2001.
I. FAHR01-30: Recommend to the Board of Directors to renew the District's Boiler&
Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15,2001 to May 15.
2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed
$75,724.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended
actions for items specified as 11(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar.
(12) ACTION ITEMS
a. FAHR01-30: Not used
b. FAHR01-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance
No. OCSD-15,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County
Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital
Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and
Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and
Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05,OCSD-06,
OCSD-11. and OCSD-13.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval
to the Board of Directors.
Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 4
May 9, 2001
C. FAHR01-32 Recommend to the Board of Directors to Adopt Resolution No.
OCSD 01- , Directing the County Tax Collection-Treasurer to include
Sanitary Sewer Charges on the 2001-02 Property Tax Bills.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval
to the Board of Directors.
(13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
(14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF
ANY
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 13, 2001 at 5 p.m.
(16) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Submitted
by:
Penny M. yle
FAHR Committee Secr ary
G:W AabpaMatMWARRMMW1 MMWea10WJ FMRMIN0.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Neebng Dare Toed.Gr Dir.
05/09/01 05/23/01
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number
FAHROI-25 15(c)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael White, Controller
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2001
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of April 2001.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional
external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian
bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements
as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the
"Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies' portfolios. The
District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of
the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase
agreements.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and
Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the
last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor
variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
Gl. dm agenda\Boom Ayeam Repp 001 eomd Agmda Rega SOWIIIam 15(00 e
Rey: d: 812M9 Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION !•
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term
investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of
posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield
analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,
yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual
holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the
source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may
not be reflected.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with
California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy.
Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted
expenditures for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts April 30,2001 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAW $28,468,891 5.8
Union Bank Checking Account 392,451 N/A
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,173,000 4.7
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 34,662,767 5.7
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 378,529,266 5.9
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,761 5.8
Debt Servica Reserves w/rrustees 35,809,651 5.9
Petry Cash 8,000 N/A
TOTAL 3479.045.Z8Z
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
MW:IC
GWq.d..,Id.TAHMFAHR IVWI An.ftp ,FAHROI-25 drc
Re.. .. Page 2
ReportPrepared by Finance, 5/8/01, 10:50 AM
Monthly Treasurer's
District Fund Balances
IIIIIIIIiI nwuw IIIIIIIIII�
Nov, 00
■
..... ..... .....
. . .
: -
C3 Bank
. M Dist 11 Bond Fund
MONTHLY REPORT "
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING
(for the month ended 30 April 2001)
Liquid Operating Monies(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $35,205,334
Mellon $35,205,538
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $35,161,163
• Mellon $35,171,193
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 036
Of Index:
020
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ithloss)of 1%Chane: $126,739
15.IA REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repro:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 36%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avera a Ptxtfollo Credit Quality: "AA+'
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.46 0.38
3 Months: 1.40 1.26
12 Months: 6.83 5.93
Year-to-Date: 2.09 1.79
Commentary
Interest rates at the chart-end of the yield curve declined during the month(3-mon0s T-Bills down 40 basis points to 3.88%),while the long<nd posted increases(30-year Treasuries op 34 basis points m 5.7W.).
The Liquid portfolio outperfomted the benchmark by 8 basis point for the month,and by 30 basis points ysart -dau.
PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper aral short-term rotes enhanced remms.
cavpm5n„u:wwnwlr...t.y.syw,aigmoa,rgeearrme
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
((or the month ended 30 April 1001)
Long-Term Operating Mania(103)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Curren Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $383,328,345
• Mellon $383,488,895
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $374,078,471
• Mellon $376,523,830
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.16
Of Index: 2.29
15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $8,279,892
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Ponfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 00/0
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 24%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.17 0.06
3 Months: 1.67 1.77
12 Months: 10.42 10.92
Year-to-Date: 2.84 3.24
Commentary
• Three-month yields decreased far the month(90-day T-Bills down 40 basis points to 3.880t)while longer maturities increased(51ear Treasury Notes up 33 basis points to 4.88%).
• The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 1 basis point for the month,but lagged the benchmark by 40 buts points year-to-date.
• PIMCO's near-index duration was neutral for performance.
• A broader-than-index maturity mix had a slightly negative impact on performance as yields rose on longer maturity holdings.
• An undesweight allocation to Treasuries contributed to returns u the Treasury sector was the worst performing bond sector during the month.
• Holdings ofmmlgage-backed securities were positive for performance as this sector omperformed Treasuries on an absolute and duration-adjusted basis.
• An underweight allocation to the corporate sector detracted from retums as corporates outperformed Treasuries on an absolute and duration-adjusted basis.
a+.pem5n�rvsotwuxtneannyn�.wmsaaly.or.arra:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. I
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 30-APR-2001 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 4,940,531.75 4.940.531.75 14.03% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 4,646,274.61 4,646,274.61 13.20% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 2,935,250.00 2,935,250.00 8.34% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 74,209.44 74,208.44 0.21% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 12,596,264.80 12,596,264.90 35.78% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 12,596,264.80 12,393364.86 35.781/6 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 3,875,257.81 3,868,296.00 10.99% -6,971.81
U.S.AGENCIES 7,937,845.57 7,946,989.98 22.57% 9,144.41
BANKING&FINANCE 9,020,241.70 9,045,229.80 25.69% 24,999.10
INDUSTRIAL 202,730.00 202,644.00 0.58% -86.00
UTILITY.TELEPHONE 996,082.20 1,003,352.70 2.85% 7,270.50
TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,032,157.28 22,066,502.48 62.68% 34,345.20
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES � .032, 2.157.18 6S-a34,345.IU
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 542,770.50 542,770.50 1.54% 0.00
TOTAL 542,770.50 542,770.50 1.54% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS ----------T.9 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 35,171,192.58 35,205,537.78 100.00% 34.34520
O&May-2001 10.16:19 F"cu0w Wmkbo mh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE: LSD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-APR-2001 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
RECEIVABLES 56,902.50 56,802.50 0,01% 0.00
PAYABLES -30,094,912.50 -30,094,812.50 -7.86% 0.00
TOTAL -30,038,010.00 -30,038,010.00 .7.84% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 24,850,130.84 24,850,130.84 6.49% 0.00
MUTUALFUNDS 235,706.69 235,706.69 0.06% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 25,095,837.53 25,085,837.53 6.55% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �, 79'L74 �435, ,172A7 --1.29% 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 19,301,261.72 19,432,568.00 5.07% 131,306.28
INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 39,605,929.00 41,472,608.37 10.83% 1,866,679.37
U.S.AGENCIES 146,109,334.48 150,332,064.00 39.26% 4,222,729.52
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 35,875,044.35 35,950,065.57 9.39% 75,021.22
ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 12,054,619.85 12,215,193.16 3.19% 160,373.31
FHLMC POOLS 7,949,732.38 7,925,530.43 2.07% -24,201.95
FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,546,720.09 4,592,261.55 1,20% 45,541.46
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,000,000.00 3,050,700.00 0.80% 50,700.00
ABS:HOME EQUITY 25,355.40 25,371.12 0.01% 15.72
BANKING&FINANCE 65,110,657.75 65,325,177.75 17.06% 214,520.00
INDUSTRIAL 11,995,436.00 11,925,073.00 3.11% 29,637.00
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,554,725.00 3.80% -67,295.00
UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,306,789.00 1.91% 6,789.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,595,550.00 1.98% 98,295.00
HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,785,218.25 0.47% 154,744.20
TOTAL UNITED STATES 376,523,830.07 383,488,895.20 100.14% 6,965,065.13
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2 ,830.07 393,498,995.26 100.14%
08-May-2001 10:17:42 aeculNe Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSFV7522202 30-APR-2001 FINAL
LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,420,193.76 4,420,193.76 1.15% 0.00
TOTAL 4,420,193,76 4,420,193.76 1,15% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,420,193.76 4,420,193.79 5.9
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 375,991,851,36 382,956,916.49 100.00% 6,965,065.13
08-Map1001 1037,42 Emcuaw Wmkbsacb.
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
OCSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/01
DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIN¢ , 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ------___-
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
74,208.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 4.132 AAA 100.000 74,208.44 .58
996085247 AAA 74,208.44 .21
3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MM ASSN DISCOUNT 4.53E .000 P-1 97.842 2,935,250.00 23.30
313589LY7 MAT 09/20/2001 A-1+ 2,935,250.00 8.47
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN MTG (RB) DISC 4.635 .000 P-1 90.817 2,271,604.00 19.92
31339REN3 MAT O7/19/2001 A-1+ 2,371,604.00 6.84
600,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 4.640 .000 P-1 98.054 588,321.62 4.67
63743CV03 08/24/2001 588,321.67 1.90
2,300,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN MTG (AE( DISC 4.661 .000 P-1 99.699 2,274,670.62 18.05
31339REM5 MAT 06/21/2001 A-1+ 2,214,600.61 6.56
912,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 4.039 .000 P-1 99.217 805,639.33 6.39
26354AT83 06/09/2001 905,639.33 2.32
900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 4.972 .000 ➢-1 99.560 096,040.00 7.11
02225ASJ2 05/18/2001 896,040.00 2.59
900,000.00 DISNEY MALT CO DISC 5.010 .000 99.295 880,155.00 6.9B
2546ROV72 08/07/2001 880,155.00 2.54
900,000.00 VENISON ULORL POD DISC 5.215 .000 98.755 888,I98.75 3.05
92344ASM2 05/21/2001 888,798.75 2.56
900,000.00 GENERAL EXEC CAP DISC 5.452 .000 P-1 90.953 881,577.00 6.99
36959HT64 06/06/2001 891,577.D0 2.54
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.619 .040 12,596,264.00 100.00
12,596,264.80 36.33
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
250,000.00 GENERAL MTR6 MTN BTR 00555 .000 4.442 A2 99.964 249,260.00 1.13
30042MECB FLTC RT O1/28/2002 DD O1/26/00 A 249,910.00 .72
3,900,000.00 U S TREASURY MOTES 4.155 7.368 AAA 101.797 3,875,257.81 17.53
912827D25 07.5001 11/15/2001 DD 11/13/91 AAA 3,860,286.00 11.16
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2
MSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01
DISTRICW� LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.56.54
FAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOED: LN BE CONS BDS 4.246 6.634 AAA 101.750 4,278,414.00 19.36
3133M WI 6.150E 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 4,273,500.00 12.33
200,000.00 FEDERAL MOVE LN BK CONS BOB 4.321 6.201 AAA 100.953 201,878.00 .91
3133MIS34 6.260E 10/29/2002 DD 10/29/97 AAA 201,906.00 .58
100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS BUS 4.376 2.024 AAA 101.437 101,525.00 .45
3133MBSU2 7.125% 11/15/2001 DO 05/11/00 AAA 101.430.00 .29
250,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN USES 4.665 6.523 AAA 101.562 253,742.50 1.15
31359MFF5 6.625E 01/15/2002 DO 1/14/2000 AAA 253,905.00 .03
249,D00.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS DEBS 4.6I0 5.169 AAA 100.609 248,044.81 1.12
313311AF5 5.200E 02/01/2002 DO 02/D1/01 AAA 248,504.23 .72
125,000.00 FED HONE LN BIG CORP DEB 4.676 I.620 AAA 101.703 127,208.75 .53
313400HV1 7.750% 11/07/2001 DO 11/07/91 AAA 127,128.75 .37
200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEB 4.840 2.332 AAA 102.297 204,660.00 .92
3135863E1 7.500% 02/11/2002 DO 2/10/92 AAA 204,594.00 .59
150,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LN BE CONS BUB 4.840 6.854 AAA 102.125 152,959.50 .69
3133MATE9 7% 02/25/2002 DO 02/25/2000 AAA . 153,197.50 .44
150,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN MTN 4.840 6.203 AAA 101.406 151,902.00 .68
31364CWL8 6.290% 02/11/2002 OD 02/11/97 AAA 152,109.00 .44
100,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CONS BDS 4.944 4.859 AAA 100.328 95,936.00 .45
3133N2DR4 4.825E 01/22/1002 DD 01/20/99 AAA 100,328.00 .29
500,000.00 OMAC MTN 5.018 5.328 A2 100.407 501,560.00 2.27
37042WFS 5.350E 12/07/2001 OD 12/07/98 A 502,035.00 1.45
455,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 5.142 5.488 AAA 100.219 455,868.45 2.06
3133M53C3 5.500E 08/13/2001 DD 08/13/90 AAA 455,996.45 1.32
300,000.00 GMAC MTM 5.199 5.850 A2 101.026 302,148.00 1.33
32042WNWI 5.910E 03/11/2002 OD 03/10/99 A 303,078.00 .87
500.000.OD HILLER FINL INC SR NTS 5.519 6.459 A3 100.670 503,020.00 2.28
423328BD4 6.500E 11/01/2001 DD 11/04/96 A- 503.350.OD 1.45
440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 000642 $.54I 5.25E A3 99.840 438,593.20 1.99
1712OW36 5.250E 10/22/2001 DO 10/22/98 A- 439,296.00 1.27
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
MSF07511102 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01
DIBTMICTs LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE i TOTAL
400.000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BK CONS BUS 5.756 4.957 AAA 100.365 397,312.00 1.81
3133M6R67 4.975% 11/23/1001 DO 11/23/99 AAA 401,460.00 1.16
820,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS BD8 5.985 5.567 AAA 100.234 819,442.00 '3.02
3133MSDS6 5.580% 08/17/2001 DO 08/17/98 AAA 821,918.80 2.37
75,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LM BK CONS BUS 5.973 6.456 AAA 100.687 75,271.50 .34
3133MCAE8 6.500% 09/28/2001 DO 09/28/00 AAA 75,515.25 .22
500,000.00 IBM CA CORP MEN ITS 00016 6.560 6.569 Al 101.078 500,268.50 2.29
44922YAR9 6.640% 10/29/2001 DO 10/29/99 A+ SO5.390.00 1.46
100,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BIG CORD DEBS 6.576 6.408 AAA 100.500 99,092.00 .45
3134AOSP3 6.440% 08/21/2001 DO DB/21/96 AAA 100,500.00 .29
700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 6.830 6.959 Al 100.593 700,707.00 3.19
00206HL44 7.000% 08/15/2001 OD 00/20/99 A. 704,151.00 2.03
440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 6.044 0.878 A2 101.377 448,219.20 2.02
345330AY6 9.000% 09/15/2001 DO 09/15/91 A 446.058.9D 1.29
1,002,000.00 WONLDCOM INC SR NTS 6.845 6.117 A3 100.135 996,002.20 4.54
9815SKAF9 6.125% 00/15/2001 DO 00/11/98 BBB+ 1,003,352.70 2.89
1,000,000.00 MANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS 6.867 6.327 A3 100.760 995,534.00 4.56
893502BS2 6.375% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/96 A- 1,007,600.00 2.91
200,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.943 5.724 A3 100.453 197,772.00 .91
423338KJO 5.750% D9/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 200,906.00 .58
200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 6.960 8.389 A3 101.322 202.130.DD .91
122014AD5 8.500% 10/01/2001 DO 10/17/91 A- 202,644.00 .58
250,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN COMP NEW SUB 6.984 9.307 Al 100.734 254,730.00 1.14
16161MLI 9.375% 07/01/2001 DO 07/01/89 A+ 251,835.00 .73
275,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE CONS BUS 7.058 5.140 AAA 100.000 270,789.06 1.24
3133MGEA2 5.140% 05/02/2001 DO 11/02/90 AAA 275,000.00 .79
500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORP HIM 100081 7.316 6.721 A3 100.428 496,495.00 2.20
06670QDJ4 6.750% 08/09/2001 DO 08/09/96 BBB+ 502.140.00 1.45
1,000.000.D0 ARISTAR INC SR HT 0.346 7.725 A3 100.329 1,003,830.00 4.54
040420ATS 7.350% 06/15/2001 DD 07/07/94 A- 1,003,290.00 2.89
YLINAA . YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4
MSP07511102 20D1/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01
DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY RACKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPH
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
1,000,000.00 FLEET/NORSTAR FINL CROUP INC 7.365 9.844 A3 100.560 1,024,020.00 4.55
339010ADS 9.9006 06/15/2001 DO D6/24/91 A- 1,005,680.00 2.10
420,000.00 BANMAMERZCA CORP HR NY 7.441 6.650 AA2 100.000 417,034.80 1.90
06605OCG2 6.650% 05/01/2001 DD 05/01/96 A+ 420,000.00 1.21
1,000,000.00 DONALDEON LUMIN 6 TEN TR00011 7.530 6.207 Al 100.051 987,060.00 4.53
25766CAL8 6.110% 05/15/2001 DO 05/27/98 A- 1,000,510.00 2.99
________ _______ ----------------- ____-----
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.730 6.672 22,032,157.20 100.00
22,066,502.48 63.66
________ _______ ----------------- _________
WTAL 4.714 5.717 34,628,422.08 100.00
34,662,767.29 100.00
.....um000.... ........
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 5
OCSF07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/01
DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.56.54
=.=................v==.=ay...====v......=.v..===......_______._............====a.........====vv==.....v=...............
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HAREET VALUE 8 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ----------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
1,1DO,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.060 1,087,465.50 4.33
07588RTL9 06/20/2001 1,087,465.50 .27
1,400,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 97.960 1,371,440.00 5.46
03588RUH6 07/17/2001 1,371,440.00 .34
1,100,000.00 DISNEY HALT CO DISC .000 .000 90.937 1,089,305.78 4.33
2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 1,088,305.78 .27
200,000.00 DISNEY HALT CO DISC .000 .000 97.795 195,590.00 .73
2546ROV72 08/07/2001 195,590.00 .05
230,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.865 227,388.73 .90
26354ASA3 05/10/2001 227,308.73 .06
2,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.405 2,558,530.00 10.19
369590T64 06/06/20DI 2,558,530.00 .63
3,700,000.00 GNAC DISC .000 .ODO P-1 90.664 3,650,551.56 14.55
37042=7 06/12/20DI 3,650,552.56 .89
1,200,000.00 GOLDHAN SACHS LP DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.715 1,184,561.33 4.72
38142TVH5 08/17/2001 1,184,501.33 .29
2,SOO,ODO.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC .000 .ODO P-1 99.405 2,487,122.22 9.91
63743CAR5 05/25/2001 2,487,122.22 .61
2,700,000.00 VERI8ON GLOBAL FOG DISC .000 .000 98.965 2,672,047.82 10.65
92344ASG5 05/16/2001 2,6]2,D4].82 .65
600,000.00 VERIEON GLOBL FOG DISC .000 .000 98.755 592,532.50 2.36
92344ASN2 05/21/2001 592,532.50 .15
235,706.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE HUNT .000 4.132 AAA 100.000 235,706.69 .93
996085247 AAA 235,706.65 .06
7,268,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.371 .ODD P-1 98.313 7,145,413.07 28.48
63743CSO7 05/24/2001 7,145,413.07 1.75
600,000.00 CAHPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.420 .000 P-1 98.194 589,162.33 2.34
13443ASX4 05/31/2001 589,162.33 .14
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSM7522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 30.56.54
PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS .508 .019 25,005,837.53 100.00
25,005,837.53 6.16
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MM .000 6.553 AAA 99.188 16,415,000.00 3.75
OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2031 AAA 14,302,260.00 3.52
14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MW .000 7.736 ARE 103.406 14,458,437.50 3.77
OIN000658 8.0008 05/15/2031 AAA 14,476,840.00 3.54
900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC GLOBAL NT .000 4.681 A2 100.156 $99,721.00 .23
073902BQO FLTG RT O8/01/2002 DD 07/29/99 A 901,404.00 .22
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO .000 7.662 AAA 97.991 2,221,375.00 .30
21HO72650 7.5001 05/20/2031 AAA 1,174,687.50 .29
4,500,000.00 DAIMLER CHRYSLER NA CORD NY .000 5.814 A3 99.593 4,491,345.00 1.16
233835AM9 MIS RT 12/16/2002 DD 12/15/00 A- 4,481,685.00 1.10
927,156.28 FRLMC GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 7.406 AAA 101.268 950,624.92 .24
3128DBMA2 7.500E 10/01/2004 DD 03/UI/99 AAA 938,912.62 .23
7,500,000.00 FEDERAL MORE IN BE CONS BDS .000 6.672 AAA 106.797 7,997,625.00 2.00
3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 8,009,775.00 1.96
20,000,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS IN BE CONS BUS .000 7.426 AAA 102.609 20,465,937.50 5.35
3133MASN2 7.620% 03/08/2005 DD 03/08/00 AAA 20,521,800.00 5.02
256,207.75 FELMC GROUP 079-6064 .000 6.299 AAA 101.234 249,962.70 .06
31348SNX3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 259,369.35 .06
4,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL SECS .000 7.185 A2 102.650 4,150,400.00 1.07
345397TS2 7.375% 02/01/2011 DD O1/30/01 A 4,106,000.00 1.00
1,043,100.04 GBMA II POOL /0080395 .000 6.456 AAA 100.688 1,033,647.74 .27
36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 1,050,277.37 .26
8,683,417.05 ENNA iI POOL BOSD40EX .000 6.456 AAA 100.688 0,595,226.10 2.27
36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 8,743,150.96 2.14
4,200,000.00 SBA GTD DRY PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 6.424 AAA 98.685 4,200,000.00 1.00
03162CW0 6.340% 03/O1/2021 RAN 4,144,770.00 1.01
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 0
OCSFO7522202 2001/04/30 RON DATE ' 05/04/01
DISTRICT: TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
___________---- _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ----------
3,000,000.00 SBA GET) PARTS CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.530 101.690 3,000,000.00 .39
831641DD4 6.640E 02/01/2011 3,050,700.00 .75
2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS .000 6.409 AAA 117.016 2,769,004.22 .70
912810DK3 07.500% 11/15/2016 DO 11/15/86 AAA 2,691,360.00 .66
6,109,311.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX RT .000 3.721 AAA 104.125 6,333,484.D9 1.65
9128274YS 3.075% 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,361,326.33 1.56
3.500,000.OD VIRGINIA ELBC 6 FUR OS HER A .000 5.879 A3 90.805 3,487,680.00 .89
920804BUD 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/D1 A- 3,423,175.00 .84
8,559,828.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.015 3.557 AAA 101.906 0,874,235.80 2.39
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 00/15/97 AAA 9,171,364.72 2.24
25,517,350.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.913 3.320 AAA 101.656 24,398,209.11 6.76
9128272M3 3.335% 01/15/2000 DO O1/15/97 Al", 25,939,917.32 6.35
1,917,359.00 MALOMON SMITH BARNEY (NAGS IMF 4.002 3.631 ARE 100.517 1,862,976.55 .50
79549BWI 3.650% 02114/2D02 OD 02/14/97 A 1,927,271.75 .40
1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HIM 5.261 6.410 A3 102.031 1,436,920.00 .37
812400MG 6.5404 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,428,434.00 .35
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR EYE 5.650 6.376 AA3 101.938 1,543,215.00 .39
046003BYE 6.5004 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,529,070.00 .37
3,950,000.00 GMAC NEB 5.752 5.618 A2 98.076 3,918,768.50 1.01
310425QV5 FLTG RT 08/10/2003 DO 08/17/90 A 3,874,002.00 .95
1,000,000.00 MI-1 R FINANCIAL INC NEE 5.760 5.224 A3 100.453 9" 030.00 .26
423330JD 5.7508 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 1,004,530.00 .25
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MEN SR 600500 5.I75 4.464 A2 100.001 999,188.90 .26
44181KST4 MID RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,000,010.00 .24
3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 5.849 6.492 A3 102.125 3,O73,170.00 .79
8124DQJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,063,750.00 .75
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY 5.881 5.534 Al 99.540 1,992,900.00 .51
066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,990,940.00 .49
1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY WITH CARE HER B 5.942 5.105 AAA 91.785 1,630,474.05 .46
64509ERM0 4.050% 07/01/2028 DD 12/01/90 AAA 1,705,218.25 .44
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8
OCSF07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/01
DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE : 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT NODDY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOON. YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 9 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________
15,500,000.00 FEDRRA4 NAIL MSC ASSN DEW 5.963 6.698 AAA 106.375 16,154,410.00 4.29
31359M I 3.1251 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,406,125.00 4.04
15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN MTN 5.901 5.803 AAA 100.219 14,955,300.00 3.92
3136402V0 5.820% 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 15,032,050.00 3.68
2,500,000.00 HEARILL LYNCH NOTBS 5.995 6.326 RA3 200.333 2,526,725.00 .65
59018MP4 6.335% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,519,425.00 .62
3,5D0,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.925 AA2 101.274 7,497,255.00 1.90
079867MS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 AAA 7,595,550.00 1.86
3,000,000.00 BALTIHORE GAS 6 RLEC CO 6.011 6.641 AT 101.640 3,038,250.00 .79
059165DN7 6.350% 12/15/2002 DO 12/20/00 A 3,049,200.00 .35
2,000,000.00 SAMEBOSTON CORD SR NTS 6.133 6.055 A2 101.155 1,999,600.00 .52
06605TAL6 6.1251 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 2,023,100.00 .50
9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.599 AAA 132.594 12,332,107.50 3.28
912810EG9 00.750% 09/15/2020 DO 08/15/90 AAA 12,596,430.00 3.00
1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC HTN ITR006I5 9.154 5.223 A3 99.156 1,499,415.00 .30
171200EBO PLTG AT O0/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 A 1,487,340.00 .36
1,700,000.00 HORGAN STANLEY RATE In 00311 6.180 4.461 RA3 100.093 1,699,517.20 .44
61345ENY3 FLTG RT O1/28/2002 DO O1/27/00 RA- 1,701,581.00 .42
2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 6.221 5.402 A2 99.960 1,990,613.60 .52
345397WO FLTG AT O8/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,360.00 .49
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 6.271 5.090 Al 100.068 2,994,300.00 .08
209111CUS PLTG AT 06/15/2002 DO O6/20/97 A+ 3,002,040.00 .33
25,355.40 GREEN THEE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.286 AAA 100.062 25,355.40 .00
3935052Y1 6.2901 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 25,371.12 .01
4,500,000.00 PBDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTH 6.291 6.143 AAA 101.422 4,400,705.00 1.29
31364CEV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAR 4,563,990.00 1.12
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN ITS 00246 6.300 4.619 A3 99.609 3,000,000.00 .79
42333nF3 PLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,988,270.00 .33
3,800,000.00 GENERAL HIM ACCEP 4T'R 00562 6.303 5.523 A2 99.546 3,793,958.00 .98
37042MKD FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/24/00 A 3,782,748.00 .93
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9
OCSFO7522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL
2,543,051.00 FNLNC NULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.789 AAA 101.755 2,545,832.09 .60
3133ME95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 AAA 2,583.681.55 .63
2,193,050.76 GNMA GTD URIC TR 2000-9 FN 6.320 5.495 AAA 100.496 2,193,850.76 .57
383304NK9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,204,732.26 .54
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.607 A2 102.171 2,031,960.00 .53
073902AN1 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 2,043,420.00 .50
3,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CC GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 5.101 A2 99.265 3,000,000.00 .07
345397SRS FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/0D A 2,939.950.00 .33
2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 5.594 A2 99.296 1,992,580.00 .51
345399RVY FLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,985,920.00 .49
22.942.61 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 6.136 AAA 93.156 21,587.71 .00
36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AM 22,095.81 .01
73,372.90 GNMA POOL 00506636 6.389 6.196 AAA 92.156 70,026.62 .01
36210YY90 6.ODO4 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 71,674.80 .02
919,754.23 GNMA POOL 40503388 6.389 6.106 AAA 97.156 073,048.00 .23
36210VFSS 6.000% 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 893,596.46 .22
26,303.70 GNMA POOL 40499153 6.309 6.196 AAA 93.156 24,967.96 .00
3621000E5 6.OD08 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 25,555.62 .01
17,453.87 GNNA POOL /0496284 6.390 6.176 AAA 97.156 16,567.54 .00
3621OM351 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 16,957.48 .00
990,056.72 GNMA POOL /0496461 6.390 6.136 AAA 97.156 944,858.52 .22
3621OMQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 864,743.51 .21
244,826.26 GNNA POOL #0491103 6.390 6.196 AAA 97.156 232,393.68 .06
36210 FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 237,863.40 .06
24,975.68 GNNA POOL /0486720 6.390 6.176 AAA 93.156 23.107.39 .00
36210AV96 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 24,265.37 .01
44,307.32 GNNA POOL /0497343 6.390 6.136 AAA 90.156 42,057.34 .01
362IONP45 1.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 43,047.22 .01
43.373.53 GNNA POOL #0469698 6.391 6.136 AAA 99.156 44,967.85 .01
36209EXRO 6.000% 11/15/2028 DO 11/01/90 AAA 46,026.23 .01
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 30
MSP07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/01
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIRE 1 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
53,909.75 GUM POOL /0467279 6.391 6.106 AAA 90.156 51,171.20 .01
36209CCQ3 6.000E 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 52,375.59 .01
83,626.65 GUM POOL #0457814 6.391 6.136 AAA 93.156 79,379.98 .02
362080SB3 6.000% 10/15/2029 DD 10/01/98 AAA 81,248.31 .02
860,306.52 GUM POOL 60467286 6.391 6.126 AAA 99.156 816,619.08 .21
36209CCK2 6.000% 10/15/2018 DD 10/01/58 AAA 835,839.40 .20
899,551.46 GUM POOL 00465555 6.392 6.136 AAA 99.156 853,071.11 .22
36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD D9/01/98 AAA 873,968.22 .22
34,005.28 GUM POOL #0483452 6.392 6.126 AAA 97.156 32,278.45 .00
36209WBV3 6.000E 09/15/2020 DD D9/U1/98 AAA 33,038.17 .01
890,184.55 GUM POOL 00465546 6.392 6.136 AAA 99.156 844,979.87 .22
36209AET3 6.000E 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AAA 864,867.70 .22
063,508.58 GUM POOL 00468339 6.392 6.196 AAA 92.156 819,658.54 .21
36209DHQO 6.000E 08/15/2020 DO 08/01/98 AAA 830,950.40 .21
46,591.91 GUM POOL #0430057 6.393 6.176 AAA 97.156 44,225.91 .01
36203PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/99 AAA 45,266.84 .01
46,211.80 GUM POOL 10468330 6.393 6.196 AAA 93.156 43,065.10 .01
36209DHF4 6.D0DA 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/90 AAA 44,997.54 .01
29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN UK CONS ADS 6.404 6.591 AAA 104.312 29,443,671.00 0.91
3133MBY04 6.805% 08/15/2003 DO 08/07/00 AAA 30,354.392.00 2.43
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.485 AAA 100.229 2,000,888.00 .52
3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AAA 2,004,580.00 .45
2,571,955.33 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.499 6.973 AAA 86.049 2,415,815.39 .53
3133TI7A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,213,141.84 .54
3,600,000.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.507 5.112 A3 100.084 3,598,528.00 .93
423328BKB ELM RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 3,603,024.00 .89
2,000,000.00 SALOMON SB ELUDE MTN 6.625 4.591 AA3 99.960 2.000.QDO.00 .52
79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/28/00 A 1.999.360.BQ .49
6,645,311.33 FHLMC GROUP IGS-0426 6.628 6.915 AAA 101.233 6,749,144.76 1.75
3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 6,727,248.46 1.45
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11
OCNFO75222D2 2001/04/30 RUN DATE [ 05/04/01
DISTRICTi LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE [ 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
1,389,737.22 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 6.305 7.273 AAA 101.344 I,42D,137.13 .36
36225CC20 3.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01197 AAA 1,408,415.29 .34
10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MID CORP DEBS 6.711 6.207 AAA 100.359 10,323,075.00 2.74
3134AITC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,537,695.00 2.50
2,OOD,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR HT 6.717 6.464 A2 102.490 1,992,280.G0 .53
531948AB0 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,049,800.00 .50
3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.939 6.548 A2 102.326 2,995,080.00 .80
345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO O7/16/99 A 3,069,780.00 .75
900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDE 6.377 6.634 AAA 101.750 099,550.00 .23
3133MA0.31 6,750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 915,750.00 .22
5,450,000.00 CIT GAP INC MTN 4SR 00042 6.810 5.205 Al 99.718 5,450,000.00 1.41
12560PBT3 FLTG RT 09/13/2002 DO 09/01/00 A9 5,434,631.00 1.33
2,SOD,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LEE INC NT 6.866 6.671 A3 ID2.609 2,498,400.00 .66
22233UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,565,225.00 .63
7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW MT 6.960 5.063 A2 100.093 7,300,000.00 1.90
682680AJ2 FLTG AT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,306,789.00 1.39
989,224.25 GNMA II POOL /0080023 6.992 3.444 AAA 102.438 1,005,608.28 .26
36225CAE9 VAR AT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 ERA 1,013,341.54 .25
7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 3.084 5.091 AA3 99.656 7,000,000.00 1.81
67182 KAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A- 6,975,920.00 1.71
2,IOD,DDO.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DEBS 7.113 6.346 AAA 104.391 2,030,133.00 .53
31359NEY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,192,211.00 .54
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LIG CO DEB 7.512 8.334 BAA3 99.389 2,151,250.00 .51
5426)1CT) 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/29/53 A- 1,967,780.00 .49
1,294,729.49 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP PER 195-7 3.564 3.536 AAA 98.594 1,275,814.29 .33
398101AE4 3.430% D6/O1/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 1,276,522.36 .31
1.OU0,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NY 3.582 6.607 A2 102.166 965,170.00 .26
345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 1,021,660.00 .25
968,D72.88 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE IDOO-11150 7.694 7.667 AAA 97.829 947,047.54 .24
302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO ID/21/99 ARA 947,047.54 .23
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 12
OCSP07522202 2001/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/01
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.56.54
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD S-P PRICE RANKLY VALUE 4 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __________
3,000,000.00 PAC IFICORP SECD MTN IM 00115 0.309 7.036 A2 103.751 2,950,530.00 .81
69512EEUS 0.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,112,530.00 :36
35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 0.324 6.523 AAA 99.641 32,498,400.00 '9.14
31364GYJ2 6.500% 03/12/2009 DD 03/12/99 AAA 35,073,632.00 8.59
1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR MT 7.967 7.348 Al 107.165 1,594,032.00 .44
020002AL5 7.075% 05/01/200S DD 05/01/00 Ai 1,714,640.00 .42
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.167 5.986 376,523,830.07 100.00
393,408,095.20 93.83
-------- ------- _________________ ---------
TOTAL 3.146 5.938 401,609,667.60 100.00
408,574,732.73 100.00
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
32,467.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -32,467.53
996085247 02-Apr-2001 32,467.53
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
32,467.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -32,467.53
996095247 02-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,184.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -119,184.84
996085247 02-Apr-2001 118,184.94
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
118,184.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 -119,184.84
996095247 02-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
812,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 09-Apr-2001 -805,639.33
26354AT87 06/08/2001 09-Apr-2001 805,639.33
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
812,000.00 DUPONT DENEMOUR DISC 09-Apr-2001 -805,639.33
26354AT87 06/08/2001 09-Apr-2001 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 09-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Mnp200/ 10:22::00 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
00G. 010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,960.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2001 -3,960.00
996085247 16-Apr-2001 3,960.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,960.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I6-Apr-2001 -3,960.00
996085247 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,564,481.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2001 -2,564,481.68
996095247 16-Apr-2001 2,564,491.68
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,364,481.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 16-Ap0001 -2,564,491.68
996095247 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900.000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Ap0001 -8%,040.00
02225AS12 05/10001 16-Apr-2001 896,040.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Apr-2001 -996,040.00
02225AS72 05/10001 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2"96.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 17-Apr-2001 -29,396.00
996085247 17-Apr-2001 28,39640
B 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Rbrkbewh,.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 3
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSGMI0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
28,396.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 28,396.00
996085247 17-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22
63743CSR5 05/252001 17-Apr-2001 2,497,122.22
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER O.OD
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22
63743CSR5 05252001 17-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Ap0001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG(RD)DIS 17-Apr-2001 -2,371,604.00
31339REN3 MAT 07/19/2001 17-Apr-2001 2,371,604.00
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG(RB)DIS 17-Apr-2001 -2,371,604.00
31339REN3 MAT 07/192001 17-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 17-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,973.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2001 -5,973.33
996085247 18-Apr-2001 5,973.33
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,973.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2001 -5,973.33
996085247 18-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 18-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-1001 10.22:00 Ezeculive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
747,710.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 -747,710.20
996085247 20-Apr-2001 747.710.20
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
747,710.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-AM2001 -747.710.20
996085247 206AM2001 0.00
FC 206AM2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
113,719.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-AM2001 -113.719.40
996085247 24-Apr-2001 113,719.40
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
113,719.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2001 -113,719.40
996085247 24-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,854.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 24-Apr-2001 -25,854.60
996085247 24-Apr-2001 25.854.60
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
25,854.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2001 -25,854.60
9%085247 24-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
12.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -12.28
996095247 25-Apr-2001 12.28
B 0.00
08-Muy-2001 10:22:00 &r v f v 0brkbe h
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
0=00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
12.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -12.28
996085247 25-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
310,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -310,833,33
996085247 25-Apr-2001 310,833.33
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO
310,833.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2001 -310,933.33
996085247 25-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL 00 DISC 25-Apr-2001 .99,997.72
26055ARS7 04/262001 25-Apr-2001 99,987.72
B GOLDMAN SACHS 8:CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 25-Apr-2001 -99,987.72
26055ARS7 0426/2001 25-Apr-2001 0.00
PC GOLDMAN SACHS R CO,NY 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,121.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 -13,121.79
996095247 26-Apr-2001 13,121.79
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,121.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 -13,121.79
996085247 26-Apr.2001 0.00
PC 26-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Ma 2001 10:22:00 Execuffm Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 27-Apr.2001 •1,184,581.33
38142TVH5 08/17/2001 27-Apr.2001 1,194,581.33
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 27-Apr-2001 -1,184,581.33
38142TV115 08/17/2001 27-Apr-2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
26,461.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2001 .26,461.33
996085247 30-Apr-2001 26,461.33
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
26,461.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2001 -26,461.33
996085247 30-Apr.2001 0.00
FC 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41,266.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr.2001 41,266.80
9%085247 30-Apr-2001 41,266.80
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41,266.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 30-Apr-2001 .41,266.90
996085247 30-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,100,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 30-Apr-2001 -1,088,305.78
2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 30-Apr-2001 1,088,305.78
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
08-Mr0-200/ /0:22:00 Executive Wnrkbench.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY D3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,100,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 30-Apr-2001 1,088,305.78
2546ROUX6 07/31/2001 30-Apr-2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 30-Apr-2001 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTG 08-Mu-2001 11,003,437.50
OIN062649 6.%MO4/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -11,003,437.50
BC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 3,501,093.75
OIN062649 6.500%04/M031 23-Apr-2001 -3,501,093.75
BE MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -11,003,437.50
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 11,003,437.50
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -11,003,437.50
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 08-Mar-2001 -3,501,093.75
0IM62649 6.500%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 3,501,093.75
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0,00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 08-My-2001 -3,501,093.75
OIN062649 6.500%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10.22:00 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANI'CATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,000,000,00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-My-2001 12,396,250.00
OIN080641 8.000%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER•PDACO
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS I&Mu-2001 -1,227,750.00
21HO72643 7.500%04202031 23-Apo2001 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23•Apr•2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 20-Mer-2001 -2,064,296.88
OINOB0641 8.000%04/152031 23•Apr•2001 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&00 INC,NY 23•Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 •Z769,074.22
912810DX3 07.500%11/152016 DD 111151 04-Apr-2001 2,769,074.22
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr•2001 •K712.71
912810DX3 07.500%11/152016 DO 111151 04-Apr-2001 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 •2,835,786.93
912810DX3 07.500%11/152016DD 11/15/ 04-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -127,208.75
31340ONVI 7.750%11/072001 DO 11/07/9 04-Apr-2001 127,208.75
B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00
O&May2001 10:22:00 aeculive Workbench,,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -3,955.73
31340ONVI 7.750%11/072001 DD 11/07/9 04-Apr-2001 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
125,000.00 FED HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 03-Apr-2001 -131,164.48
31340ONV I 7.750%11/072001 DD 11/0719 04-Apr-2001 0.00
PC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 OMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -501,560.00
37042WVF5 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apr-2001 501,560.00
B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -594.44
37042WVF5 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apr-2001 0.00
IS, 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500.000.00 OMAC MTN 04-Apr-2001 -502.154.44
37042WVFS 5.350%12/072001 DD 12107/9 09-Apo-2001 0.00
PC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 09-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 4,181,199.22
912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 11/15/ 06-Apr-2001 4,191,199.22
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 -120,621.55
912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DD 111151 06-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
08-Ma3.1001 10:22:00 Execuum Warkbew
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSGOOOIOOoo 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCS11-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-Apr-2001 .4,301,820.77
912827D25 07.500%11/15/2001 DD 111151 06-Apo-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.OD COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG II-Apr-2001 -10,934,697.50
OIND62656 6.500%05/15/2031 21-May-2001 10,934,687.50
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 -3,480,312.50
OIN062656 6.500%05/152031 21-May-2001 3,480,312.50
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO 17-Apr-2001 -1,221,375.00
21HO72650 7.5001A05202031 21-May-2001 1,221,375.00
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG IR-Apr-2001 -2,065,625.00
OINDS0658 8.000%051152031 21-May-2001 2,065,625.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,000,000.OD COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 -12,392,SI2.50
OIN080658 8.000%05/152031 21-May-2001 12,392,812.50
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK - 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 -101,525.00
3133MBJU2 7.125%1 IIMOOI DO 0511110 20-Apr-2001 101,525.00
B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 E mlim WwkbencA.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 11
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 3,067.71
3133MBIU2 7.125%11/15/2001 DD 05/1110 20-Apr-2001 0,00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-Apr-2001 -104,592.71
3133MB1U2 7.125%11/152001 DD05/11/0 20-Apr-2001 0.00
FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000 00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -201,878.00
3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 201.978.00
B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -6,155.67
3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -208,033.67
3133MIS34 6.260%10/292001 DD 1029/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00
FC ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 26-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,200,000,00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 4,278,414.00
3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DO 02101/0 24-Apr-2001 4,278,414.00
B ASH AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -65,362.50
3133MAQI I 6.750%02101/2002 DO 02/01/0 24-Apr-2001 0.00
IB 0.00
08-May4001 10.22:00 Execiaw Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 23-Apr-2001 -4,343,776.50
3133MAQJI 6.750%021012002 DO 02/01/0 24-Apr-2001 0.00
FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING.CHICA 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 -255,762.45
3133M5BC3 5.500Yo08/132001 DDOS/13/9 26-Apr-2001 255,762.45
B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 -2,843.96
3133M5BC3 5.500%08/13/2001 DD 08/13/9 26-Apr-2001 0.00
IB 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
255,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-Apr-2001 ,258,606.41
3133M5BC3 5.500%08/132001 DO 0811IN 26-Apr-2001 0.00
FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 26-Apr-2001 0.00
PAY UPS
FIRED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9.32 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jm-2001 -9.32
3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Jm-2001 0.00
FC 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mar-2001 41.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Mar-2001 41.50
PU 0.00
08-May-2001 10.22:00 Executive {farkbe h
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Met-2001 -41.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Mer-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2001 -12,795.75
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 11/0119 01-Apr-2001 12,795.75
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2001 -12,795.75
3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15M023 DO I VOIN 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr2001 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-131,164.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr.2001 131,164.48
996095247 04-Apr.2001 -131,164.48
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-131,164.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2001 131,164.48
996085247 04-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-75,620.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2001 75,620.67
996085247 04-Apr.2001 .75,620.67
S 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 &x na v Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-75,620.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apn2001 75,620.67
9%D85247 04-Apr.2001 0.00
FC 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,600,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr.2001 593,163.00
07588RTL9 06/202001 04-Apr-2001 ,593,163.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY o 00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000AO BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr-200i 741.17
07588RTL9 06202001 04-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,600,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 04-Apr-2001 593,904.17
07588RTL9 06/202001 04-Apr.2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
.4,300,000.00 US TREASURY BILL 05-Apr-2001 4,175,831,53
9127950C9 04/192001 DD 10/19100 06-Apr-2001 .4,175,831.53
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-4,300,000.OD U S TREASURY BILL 03-Apr-2001 116,590.91
912795GC9 04/192001 DD 10/19/00 06-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-4,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 05-Apr-2001 4,292,422.44
912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 06-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-1001 10.22.:00 ErewNr Warkbewh.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSDCONSOL/DAM
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMFLDATE GAEWLOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .
-9,399.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Apr-2001 9,398.33
996085247 06-Apr-2001 -9,39833
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-9,398.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Apr-2001 9,398.33
996085247 06-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 06-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-7,149.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Apr-2001 7,149.33
996085247 09-Apr-2001 -7,149.33
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-7,149.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Apr-2001 7,149.33
996085247 09-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 09-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.2,487,122.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 2,487,122.22
996085247 17-Apr-2001 -2,487,122.22
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,497,12122 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2001 2,487,122.22
996085247 17-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 99,769.72
313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-Apr-2001 -98,769.72
S GOLDMAN SACHS&.CO,NY 0.00
08-May-1001 10:21:00 Executive Wmkbmck
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 - 30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 904.03
313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Apr-2001 99,673.75
313589FS7 MAT 05/17/2001 20-APr-2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-4,918.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96
996085247 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-4,918.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2001 4,918.96
996085247 20-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-69,503,91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2001 69,503.91
996085247 23-Apr-2001 -69,503.91
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-69,503 91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 23-Apr-2001 69,503.91
996085247 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 481,115.69
313589GW7 MAT06/14R001 24-Apr-2001 481,115.69
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
0&hfay-2001 10:22:00 Enculme Workbench .,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, n
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 2,986.66
313589GW7 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 0.00
75 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
487,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 484,102.35
313589GW7 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr.2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 1,185,622.00
313397GW5 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 -1,195,622.00
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 7,239.00
313397GW5 MAT 06/14/2001 24-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 24-Apr-2001 1,192,960.00
313397GW5 MAT 06/142001 24-Apr-2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 2,666,782.50
313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 -2,666,792.50
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Apr-2001 25,886.25
313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
08-Uap2001 10.22:00 Exeeuttee Wmkbexh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,700,000,00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 24-Apn2001 2,692,668.75
313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 24-Apr-2001 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-50,875.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2001 50,875.71
996085247 26-Apr-2001 -50.875.71
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-P1MCO
.50,875.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr.2001 50,875.71
996085247 26-Apr.2001 0.00
PC 26-Apr.2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPF.R-PIMCO
.1,184,581.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 27-Apr.2001 1,184,591.33
996085247 27-Apr-2001 4,184,581.33
S 0.00
LONO TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,184,581.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Apr-2001 1,184,581.33
996095247 27-Apr.2001 0.00
FC 27-Apr-2001 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
.2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 2,149,697.50
912810EQ7 06.250%08/15/2023 DD 081151 04-Apo-2001 -2,179,375.00
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER .29,697.50
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 16,574.59
912810EQ7 06.250%08/152023 DO 08/151 04-Apr-2001 0.00
Is 0.00
08-Aiay-2001 10:22:00 Exaafrve H wkbenoh:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 02-Apr-2001 2,166,262.09
912810EQ7 06.250°A 08/15/2023 DO 081151 04-Apr.2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER a 10-Apr-2001 948,300.00
613041GH9 5.000%11/15/2029 DD 1201/9 16-Apr-2001 -961,640.00
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 96,660.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000,00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 20,972.22
613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr.2001 969,272.22
613041GH9 5.000%11/152029DD 12/00 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr.2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 948,300.00
613041GH9 5.000%1111512029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 -861,640.00
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 86,660.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 20,972.22
613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12101/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 10-Apr-2001 969,272.22
613041GH9 5.000%11/152029 DO 12/01/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Map1001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 - 30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 1 i-Apr-2001 10,951,015.63
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -11,003,437.50
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -52,421.97
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 10,951,015.63
OIN062649 6.500%04/IW031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I I-Apr-2001 3,485,371.09
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -3,501,093.75
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER -15,722.66
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG II-Apr-2001 3,485,371.09
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Apr-2001 1,221,937.50
21HO72643 7.500Yo04/20/2031 23-Apr-2001 -1,227,750.00
S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK -5,812.50
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 11 JUMBOS 17-Apr-2001 1,221,937.50
21HO72643 7.500%04/20/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 18-Apr-2001 2,065,OW.00
OIN080641 8.000%04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 -2,064,363.84
S BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 636.16
08-May-2001 10:22:00 &x .INe Obrkbewh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINfLOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 2,065,000.00
OIN080641 8.000Ye04/152031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 12,390,000.00
OINO80641 8.000%04/152031 23-Apr-2001 -12,386,183.04
S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 3,916.96
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 18-Apr-2001 12,390,000.00
OIN080641 8.000Yo04/15/2031 23-Apr-2001 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 305,695.31
912827D25 07.500Y 11/15/2001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 -305,941.41
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C -246.10
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 10,069.06
912827D25 07.500%11/152001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 0.00
IS 0,00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Apr-2001 315,764.37
912827D25 07.500%11/15/2001 DO 111151 26-Apr-2001 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Apr-2001 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Erecuthe Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 22
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
38,745.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 -38,745.00
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Feb-2001 38,787.37
PDC 42.37
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-38,786.50 - FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 39,796.50
3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Feb-2001 38,828.92
PD -42.42
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-38,796.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 38,786.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Feb-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,209.95 FHLMC GROUP 878fi064 01-Mer-2001 2,209.95
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012029 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,769.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mar-2001 47,769.50
3133TCE95 VARRT09/152032 15-Mar-2001 47,921.74
PD -52.24
TANG TERM OPF.R-PIMCO
-243,684.45 FHLMC GROUP 805-0476 01-Apr-2001 243,694.45
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -247,492.02
PD -3,907.57
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-243,684AS FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 01-Apr-2001 243,694.45
3129DDQ53 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 021011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Ma),2001 10:22:00 Execul(ve Sbrkbeech
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 23
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP#G4.0353 01-Apr-2001 34,316.69
3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/011 01-Apr-2001 35,185.32
PD -868.64
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2001 34,316.68
3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-102.28 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2001 102.28
36210YY90 6.0000/.04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -97.09
PD 5.19
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-102.29 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2001 10228
36210YY90 6.0001/6 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apt-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-748.92 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apr-2001 749.92
36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -710.89
PD 38.03
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-748.92 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apo-2001 749.92
36210AVM6 6.0001A 12/15/2028 DD 121011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41.29 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Apr-2001 41.29
36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Apr-2001 -39.19
PD 2.10
08-Map100i 10.22:00 E=utiw Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIOW SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41.29 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Apr-2001 41.29
36209NBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.31.43 GNMA POOL 80499153 01-Apr-2001 31.43
3621000E5 6.000%07AR2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -29.83
PD 1.60
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-31.43 GNMA POOL 00499153 01-Apr-2001 31.43
3621000E5 6.000%02/1 512 029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-APr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-716.23 GNMA POOLN0500917 01-Apr-2001 716.23
36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -679.86
PD 36.37
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-716.23 GNMA POOL80500917 01-Apr-2001 716.23
36210SPA0 6.000"A04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.55.75 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Apr-2001 55.75
362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/011 01-Apr-2001 .52.92
PD 2.83
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-55.75 GNMA POOL80497343 01-Apr-2001 55.75
362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Execud"Wmkbeuh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcSG"l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SDAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,090.42 GNMA POOL80496284 01-Apr-2001 3,090.42
36210MJSI 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr.2001 -2,933.49
PD 156.93
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,090.42 ONMA POOL80496284 01-Apr.2001 3,090.42
36210MJ51 6.000.01/15/2029 DO 02/011 01-Apr.2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-323.93 GNMA POOL80491103 01-Apr.2001 323.93
36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/OI/ 01-Ap000I -307.48
PD 16.45
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.323.93 ONMA POOL 80491103 01-Apr.2001 323.93
36210PRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Ap0001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-82,191.61 GNMA II POOL W080088M 01-Ap0001 82,191.61
36225CC20 7,375%06/20/2027 DO 06101/ 01-Apr-2001 -83,989.55
PD -1,797.94
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-82,191.61 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2001 82,191.61
36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.68,804.00 GNMA 11 POOL#0090395 01-Apr-2001 68,804.00
36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 .69,190.46
PD 623.54
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive WorWmh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -
-69,804.00 GNMA II POOL 80080395 01-Apr-2001 68,804.00
36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-52.81 GNMA POOLB0438057 01-Apr2001 52.81
36207PT49 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -50.13
PD 2.69
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-52.81 GNMA POOL 80438057 01-Apr-2001 52.81
36207PTN9 6.0009/.05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,261.42 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Apr-2001 1,261.42
36209AET3 6.000°h08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -1,197.36
PD 64.06
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,261.42 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Apr-2001 1,261.42
36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Apr2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-27,093.64 GNMA POOL M0465555 01-Apr-2001 27,093.64
36209AE48 6.000'AQ9/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -25,717.79
PD L375.85
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.27,093.64 GNMA POOLA0465555 01-Apr-2001 27,093.64
36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DO 091011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10.22:00 Emcntim Workbeircb..
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 27
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-87.83 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Apr-2001 87.83
36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -93.37
PD 4A6
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-87.83 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Apr.2001 $7.83
36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.205.79 GNMA FOOL90467286 01-Apr-2001 1,205.79
36209CCX2 6.000%IW5/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 -1,144.56
PD 61.23
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,205.79 ONMA POOL80467286 01-Apr2001 1,205.79
36209CCX2 6.000%1 011 520 2 8 DO 101011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-59.69 GNMA POOL90468330 01-Apr-2001 59.69
36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -56.66
PD 3.03
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-59.69 GNMA POOLOD469330 01-Apr-2001 59.69
36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,026.27 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Apr-2001 1,026.27
36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -974.15
PD 52.12
08-May-200f 10.22:00 Fmullw Workbexh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 28
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.026.27 GNMA POOL 90468339 01-Apr-2001 1,026.27
36209DHQO 6.000%0B/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr.2001 - 0.00
FC - 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
459,887.79 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Apr-2001 459,887.78
36225CN28 6.500%05/7A2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2001 -455,217.05
PD 4,670.73
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
,459,987.78 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Apr-2001 459,887.78
36225CN28 6.500Ye 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 20-Apr.2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,826.53 ONMA PGOLp0496461 01-Apr-2001 6,926.53
36210MQN4 6.000"A01/152029DDOI/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -6,479.87
PD 346.66
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,826.53 GNMA POOL40496461 01-Apr-2001 6,926.53
36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.1,122.35 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2001 1,122.35
36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DD 03/011 01-Apr-2001 -1,065.36
PD 56.99
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,122.35 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2001 1,122.35
36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Ma3-2001 10:22:00 Exec dw B'mkbewh.,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLM4TED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-694.38 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Apr-2001 694.39
36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2001 659.12
PD 35.26
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.694.38 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Apr-2001 694.38
36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-916.96 GNMA POOL 00469698 01-Apr2001 916.96
36209EXRO 6.000%11/152028 DO 111011 01-Apr-2001 -870.40
PD 46.56
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-916.% ONMA POOL80469688 01-Apr-2001 916.96
36209EXRB 6.000%1111312028 DO 11/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8.417.05 FHLMC GROUP 878fi064 01-Apr-2001 8,417.05
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 -8,211.89
PD 205.16
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.65,529.45 ONMA 11 POOL N0090023 01-Apr-2001 65,529.45
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Apo-2001 46,614.78
PD -1,095.33
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.65,529.45 GNMA U POOL 00090023 01-Apr-2001 65,529.45
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 20-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Map100I I0:11:00 Ereculim Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocs000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDA7ED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,577.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA 895 01-Apr-2001 2,577.35
398108AE4 7.430Ye 06/01/2003 DD 02129/0 01-Apr-2001 2,539.70
PD 37.65
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,577.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Apr-2001 2,577.35
398108AE4 7.430%0"1/2003 DD 02129/0 01-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 26-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-615.95 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 9000-11150 01-Apr-2001 615.95
302998GE3 7.500%1 210 1/2 03 0 DO 1021/9 01-APr-2001 .602.57
PD 13.38
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 I S-Apo-2001 29,971.91
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826/9 15-Apr-2001 -29,971.91
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A4 15-Apr-2001 29,971.91
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826t9 15-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apo-200I 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Apr 2001 58,254.53
3837H4NX9 VARRT02/162030 16-Apr-2001 -58,254.53
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16-Apr-2001 58,254.53
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/I62030 16-Apr-2001 0.00
FC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
MATURITIES
08-A4oy-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 09-Apr-2001 790,916.67
07588RR98 04109/2001 09-Apr-2001 -790,916.67
MT 09-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC I6-Apr-2001 888,576.00
13443ARG2 04/162001 16-Apr-2001 -899,576.00
MT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Apr-2001 2,381,450.00
313397ELI MAT 04/172001 17-Apr-2001 -2,381,450.00
MT 17-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 BECFON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2001 98,622.36
07588RRR8 04252001 25-Apr-2001 -98,622.36
MT 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 25-Apr-2001 297,14133
90328ARR6 04252001 25-Apr-2001 -297,141.33
MT 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100,000,00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 26-Apr-2001 99,987.72
26055ARS7 04I26/2001 26-Apr-2001 -99,987.72
MT 26-Apr-2001 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
08-May-1001 10:22:00 Emuliw Wwkbexh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 09-Apr-2001 500,000.00
37042WRTO 5.800%04/09/2001 DD 04108/9 09-Apr-2001 498,260.00
MT 09-Apr-2001 1,740.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN STR 00004 30-Apr-2001 1,000,000.00
73317PADI 6.200%04130/2001 DD 04210 30-Apr-2001 -1,000,000.00
MT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
CORPORATE ACTIONS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,384.98 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 638C90
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/15/9 16-Apr-2001 -1,384.97
CAL -0.07
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,384.98 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 1,384.90
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DD03/15/9 16-Apr-2001 0.00
PC 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,738.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00
SD 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
36,408.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00
SD 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,767.70 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 30-Apr-2001 0.00
SO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
103,270.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
9128272143 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2001 0.00
SO 0.00
INTEREST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Feb-2001 15,346.19
3133TCE95 VARRTOB/15/2032 15-Jm-2001 0.00
IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-30.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 27-Feb-2001 -15,346.19
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-1m-2001 0.00
ITC 27-Feb-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,386.96 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 26-Mm-2001 -5,525.47
39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DID 0229/0 01-Mm-2001 0.00
ITC 26-Mar-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 26-Mm-2001 5,525.47
39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 022910 01-Mm-2001 0.00
IT 26-Mm-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Execwive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/IASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Apr-2001 0.32
996087094 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 GMAC MTN 02-Apr-2001 9,965.00
37042WWN7 5.910%03/11/2002 DO 03/10N 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 02-Apr-2001 14,500.00
37042WRTO 5.800%04/09/2001 DO 04/0819 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 02-Apo-2001 79,687.50
59018SXP4 6.375%10Po1/2001 DO 10/03/9 01-Apr.2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr.2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 02-Apr-2001 8,500.00
122014AD5 9.500%10/01/2001 DO 10/17/9 01-Apr2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 602.53
996085247 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2001 39,497.02
996085247 01-Apo-2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-1001 10.22:00 Exenim Workbench,.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 35
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001-30-APR-2001
OCSO-CONSOMDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9.32 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 02-Apr-2001 9.32
3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 1543 2001 0.00
IT 02-Apr.2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 09-Apr-2001 9,093.33
07588RR98 04/092001 09-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 09-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 09-Apr-2001 644.44
37042WRTO 5.800%04/092001 DO 04/0819 09-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 09.Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 16-Apr-2001 67,500.00
073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 15-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Apr-2001 7.16
31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/1SN 15-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 16-Apr-2001 11,424.00
13443ARG2 04/162001 16-Apr2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
323.93 GNMA POOL80491103 16-Apr-2001 1,225.75
36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - PAGE: 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
34,316.68 FHLMC GROUP AG4-0353 I6-Apr-2001 0009.21
3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
243,684.45 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 16-Apr-2001 40,185.81
3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,090.42 GNMA POOL#0496284 16-Apo-2001 102.72
36210M751 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,826.53 GNMA POOLW0496461 16-Apr-2001 4,494.41
36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT I6-Apr-200I 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
55.75 GNMA POOL0497343 16-Apr-2001 221.82
36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31.43 GNMA POOL 40499153 16-Apr-2001 131.68
3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
716.23 GNMA POOLp0500917 16-Apr-2001 117.29
36210SPA0 6.000°A 04/152029 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10.22:00 &¢cube Ww116emb
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG0001000D 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,122.35 ONMA POOL80503388 16-Apr-2001 4,604.39
36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
102.29 GNMA POOL80506636 16-Apr-20D1 369.38
36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,209.95 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 16-Apr-2D01 1,418.45
31348SW23 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-My-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
52.81 GNMA POOL80438057 16-Apo-2001 233.22
36207FTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
694.38 GNMA POOLM0457814 16-Apr-2001 421.60
36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,261.42 GNMA POOL 90465546 16-Apr-2001 4,457.23
36209AET3 6.00D%0 8/1 51202 8 DO 08/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
27,093.64 GNMA POOL80465555 16-Apr-2001 4,633.23
36209AE49 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-Map2001 10:22:00 Fs mtiw Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATF/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
97.83 GNMA POOL 00467279 16-Apr-2001 269.98
36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/0V 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,205.79 GNMA POOL 90467286 16-Apr-2001 4,307.56
36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
59.69 GNMA POOL80468330 16-Apr-2001 231.36
36209DHF4 6.000%05/152029 DO 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.026.27 GNMA POOL80468339 16-Apr-2001 4,322.67
36209DHQ0 6.000%09/152028 DD 08101/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
916.96 GNMA POOL80469688 16-Apo-2001 241 A6
36209EXR8 6.000%11/152029 DO 111011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41.29 GNMA POOLA0483452 16-Apr-2001 170.23
36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD091OI/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
748.92 GNMA POOL M0486720 16-Apr-2001 128.62
36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2029 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-1001 10:11:00 Eu m1w lFvkbowk,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOMDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
29,971.91 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL AJ 16-Apr-2001 290.01
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 08/26/9 15-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
58,254.53 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2001 10,603.66
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
39,786.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-Apr-2001 15,181.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Ma 2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr4001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
41.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-Apr-2001 41.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Ma 2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,795.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 16-Apr-2001 12,795.75
3133117A4 6.000%1 I/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 16-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Apr.2001 18,550.00
313397ELI MAT 04/172001 17-Ap-2001 0.00
IT 17-Apr-200I 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
92,191.61 GNMA U POOL A080088M 20-Apo-2001 9,046.23
36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
68,804.00 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-Apr-2001 6,022.82
36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-APr-2001 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
65,529.45 ONMA 11 POOL 00090023 20-Apr.2001 6,702.08
36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 1210119 01-Apr.2001 0.00
IT 20-Apr.2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
459,887.78 ONMA II POOL 4080408X 20-Apr.2001 49,526.23
36225CN28 6,500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTR006 23-Apr-2001 5,973.33
17120QE80 FLTO RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 21-Apr.2001 0.00
IT 23-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24-Apr-2001 113,719.40
682680A32 FLTO RT 04242002 DD 0424/ 24-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 24-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Apr-2001 10,833.33
3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 25-Apo-2001 2,858.67
90328ARR6 04/252001 25-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-1001 10.22:00 Faecud"WPrkbaak,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 41
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000lo000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2001 1,377.64
07588RRR8 04/25/2001 25-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 25-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,297,306.94 GREYSTONE SVCNO CORP FRA M95 26-Apr-2001 2,511.94
39810MAE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 02/2910 01-Mer-2001 0.00
IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 DOW CHEMICAL CO DISC 26-Apr-2001 12.29
26055ARS7 04/26/2001 26-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA M95 26-Apr-2001 8,032.50
39810MAE4 7.4301Y.0&01/2003 DD 02/29/0 01-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 26-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN MTR 00246 30-Apr-2001 44,419.37
42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DD 04/27/ 28-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 30-Apr-2001 6,260.00
3133MIS34 6.260%10292001 DD 1029/9 29-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apo-2001 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN MTR 00016 30-Apr-2001 16,600.00
44922YAR9 6.640%10292001 DO 10/29/9 29-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10.22:00 Erecudw War6bewh
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000l0000 01-APR-2001 -30-APR-2001
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS MTN NTR 00555 30-Apr-2001 3,601.33
37042WZCS FLTG RT 0129/2002 DO 01261 28-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN ATR 00311 30-Apr-2001 24,590.85
61745ENY3 FLTO FIT 01/282D02 DO 01271 28-Apr-2001 oto
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 30-Apr-2001 29,562.36
79548EEE8 FLTG FIT 0428/2003 DO 04291 28-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN BTR 00004 30-Apr-2001 31,000.00
73317PADI 6.200%0 413 02 0 01 DO 0421/9 30-Apr-2001 0.00
IT 30-Apr-2001 0.00
08-May-2001 10:22:00 Executive ft kbeadu
FAHR COMMITTEE MeebngDate roaa.orar.
51ovrot 513ro1
AGENDA REPORT FA Numbe Item
Number
FAN um 1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT PREPARED BY STAFF
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2001.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive, file and approve the Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended
March 31, 2001.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial
Report for the period ended March 31, 2001. This report is a consolidation of the
financial accomplishments of the District through the third quarter of the 2000-01
fiscal year.
Contained within the Third Quarter Financial Report are budget summary reviews
of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement
Program, the Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 76.11 percent, or
$35 million of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of$46.0 million has been
expended. Net costs have increased 6.71 percent in comparison with the same
period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2001 is $518.25 based on flows of
67.56 billion gallons, or 246.55 million gallons per day. This is $3.85, or 0.75
percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. This overage is
primarily due to net expenses being 1.48 percent, or$511,200 higher than
budget through March 31, offset slightly by flows being 0.63 percent higher than
the budgeted amount of 245 million gallons per day.
Capital improvement outlays through March 31 were 50.71 percent of budget, or
$42,360,300. Outlays during the fourth quarter are expected to bring the total to
$57,706,970.
Collection system operations and maintenance expenses of all Revenue Areas
totaled $7.6 million, or 79.31 percent of the annual budget through March 31.
c:wy Uu�penN dA 0e �001 awm AWM fl,[Me W%Mlem,5(E).M0tWRdc
Page 1
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable(information item)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2001.
G A,1.RepmsrlWI Bpard R9..ReputsIDWII1bm ISIdI 3ffi kd-
Rensed 11510 Page 2
FAHIRCOMMITTEE MeetlngDate roeo.oroo-.
OS/g/01 5/23/01
AGENDA REPORT Item Numtxr Item Number
FAHR01-2e ISM
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR
THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2001 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2001
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2001.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting
requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid
Operating Monies;' and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,' are managed by PIMCO,
the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's
investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the
California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark
indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the
District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios
do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
cw .duugewa rdaeenm FeP"WOl ewrdneeode Repo $WWI%ftm 15(040e
Rewsae mane Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION �•
1
Performance Reports
The Quartedy Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement
Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also
attached are comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit
quality of the District's portfolios, as of December 31, 2000 and March 31, 2001. The
Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely
of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as
compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through March 31, 2001.
Portfolio Performance Summary
Quarter Ended March 31,2001
Liquid Operating Doles Lang-Tenn Opera Monies(%)
Total le Total Rate of
of Return Benchmar0 Rehm Benchmark•..
Months 1.6 1.4 .7 3.2
6 Months 3.5 6. 6.4
9 Months 5.2 4.5 8.5 9.1
12 Mori 6.9 6.0 10.5 10.9
incelncep0on 30 Sept.95 5.8 5.J 6.9 6.7
Markel Value per PIMCO 31 Dec 00 35.010 382.7
Average Quality "AA+" 'M.-
Current Yield(%) 5.8 .1
Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 4.6 5.1
Quarterly Deposits(Wiftrawals) $9.4M
Estimated Annual Income 1.9M $22.6M
(1) Benchmarks:
• Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index
• Long-Tenn Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt.1.5 Year Bond Index
Market Recap
Positive returns from fixed income securities helped anchor diversified portfolios during
a quarter in which every major global stock market finished in negative territory. All
bond market sectors gained as investors anticipated more easing by the Federal
Reserve to stimulate a weakening economy. Stocks retreated as the correction in the
technology sector that began last year spread to other industries.
Investors looking for safety pushed Treasury yields lower during the quarter, with
shorUintermediate maturities falling the most. The two to 30-year portion of the yield
curve steeped sharply as the two-year yield fell 20 basis points to close at 4.92 percent.
The backdrop for falling interest rates was the ailing U.S. economy. U.S. growth slowed
to 1.0 percent in the final quarter of 2000,the weakest pace in 5 1/2 years. This sudden
o:My.a,avgnftbaud ftaM fteM.T'dot BwN nand.nreaftKi llllam 15h1.4oc
Rdh..d: 142016 Page 2
deceleration prompted two 50 basis point rate cuts by the Fed in January to prevent a
slowdown from turning into a recession.
Signs of economic weakness continued to mount, however, including a relentless
procession of profit warnings from companies in a diverse range of industries. On
March 20, the Fed cut another 50 basis points and suggested that more easing could
soon be on the way. The central bank stated that it "will need to monitor events closely"
as "the economic situation could be evolving rapidly." Consumer confidence revived
late in the quarter as employment levels remained relatively high. Even so, pessimists
who thought the Fed should have acted more aggressively at its March meeting could
point to retrenchment in business investment as a sign that the economy would
continue to weaken.
The corporate sector staged a recovery in the first quarter, regaining some ground lost
during a difficult period last year. The following is a comparison of fixed income sector
returns:
• Corporates outperformed Treasuries, helped by a strong January when Fed easing
stimulated investors' risk appetites. Demand for corporates cooled later in the
quarter, however, as investors refocused on deteriorating credit fundamentals in the
slowing economy. A major source of weakness was the telecom sector, which
suffered its biggest slump in five years in March.
• Mortgages lagged Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. Rising prepayments
after the recent fall in mortgage rates created price pressure that was not completely
offset by mortgages' relatively high yields.
Performance results of the Long-Term Portfolio
The long-term portfolio managed by PIMCO turned in a 2.66 percent return over the
quarter, underperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 51
basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors:
• near-benchmark duration was neutral for performance;
• greater-than-index exposure to longer maturities was negative as short maturity
rates fell most and the yield curve steepened;
• corporate holdings added to returns as Fed easing sparked a recovery early in the
quarter that allowed corporates to regain some ground lost last year;
• mortgage exposure was slightly negative as price pressure due to repayments offset
relatively high yields; and
• Real return bonds added to relative returns, outperforming like-duration Treasuries
as real yields fell.
o vw.at.v'eeaa,mem ngems•eponnzas,ewrone.w wou�:wwnrem,s�el<x
�,a:ermae Page 3
Performance results of the Liouid Operating Portfolio
The liquid portfolio managed by PIMCO turned in a 1.63 percent return over the quarter,
outperforming the three-month Treasury Bill Index by 23 basis points. This portfolio's
performance was due in part to the following factors:
• a 1.79 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill Index
by 22 basis points;
• investment-grade corporate holdings detracted from performance as these issues
were hurt by increased investor risk aversion; and -
• use of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes enhanced returns
for the quarter and the year.
PIMCO's Market Outlook
The U.S. will be mired in the first recession of the New Age Economy over the next
three to four quarters as consumption and investment bubbles deflate. Global growth
will weaken as demand in Europe, Japan and emerging markets will not compensate for
the loss of the U.S. as consumer and borrower of last resort. Monetary and fiscal
stimulus worldwide will mitigate, but not halt ongoing deceleration in global growth.
• As PIMCO feared in its secular outlook last May, the U.S. economy will fall into a
recession as growth slows well below recent trends. The recession in a New Age
Economy will arise from correction of imbalanced consumption, investment and
borrowing. Weakness in the near term will be exacerbated by inventory corrections
in the manufacturing and technology sectors.
• Greater savings by debt-laden and increasingly anxious consumers will shackle the
economy. Weak equity markets will confront consumers with a negative wealth
effect whereby they must save more of their disposable income to achieve their
wealth objectives. Confidence will erode as layoffs mount, encouraging consumers
to curtail spending.
• U.S. capital spending will continue to decline. Weak demand will crimp companies'
internally generated funds even as their leveraged balance sheets and heightened
investor risk aversion restrict their access to capital. To protect cash flow and
service debt, companies will curtail investment and cut expenses via more layoffs.
• Monetary and fiscal policy in the U.S. will be stimulative, mitigating the severity of
the recession. The Federal Reserve will move toward a zero real federal funds rate,
which means cutting the nominal rate to four percent or lower over the coming
months.
• U.S. inflation will be subdued. Corporations do not have the pricing power to pass
on rising costs stemming from tight labor markets and higher energy prices. A softer
economy will reduce these price pressures going forward.
a:W ...�nfta• fta Re IVWt5 Ap FepwbW Iftm 15(.)-0
R..I.W:erm•e Page 4
PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Tenn Portfolio includes:
• Target duration above benchmark as a slumping economy puts a cap on interest
rates and the longer duration will also offset refinancing risk from mortgage holdings;
• Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure to take advantage of value across
the yield curve, especially in mortgages and high quality corporates;
• Continue to emphasize mortgages to take advantage of relatively high yields and
strong credit quality;
• Hold top quality, short-duration corporates with compelling valuations; and
• Continue to focus on real return bonds as yields are expected to decline in the face
of a slower global economy.
PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes:
• Maintain extended duration as weaker growth puts a cap on interest rate risks and
the longer duration will also offset refinancing risk arising from mortgage holdings;
• Take advantage of relatively high yields on select short-maturity, high-quality
corporate issues;
• Continue to invest in high quality commercial paper as a means to add value and
liquidity to the portfolio; and
• Utilize agency discount notes, which offer a yield premium over Treasury bills.
Portfolio Market Values
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table
below, and in the attached bar chart.
Liquid Long-Tama
Ouartar Opening 0pam0n9
Ending Monies($M) Monies(SM)
31 March 00 19.9 351.6
30 June 00 33.3 356.2
30 Set 00 33.9 352.0
31 Dec.00 34. 363.4
31 March 01 35.50 362.7
a:W.•.ftNWdal ,dl nw Fepa mot Burn AWW nep Imiem 15e).
ne.;eed:arzoea Page 5
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart
4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2)
5. Historical Yield Curve Graph
c Wq.�laNperbaWarC n6ena nepMarMot eoara names aeponsWsoluiem ISMAx
aersea ersase Page 6
Prepared by Finance, 5/1/01, 2:58 PM
OCSD Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$400,000,000
$350,000,000
$300,000,000
$250,000,000
$200,000,000
$150,000,000 -
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
$0
31 Mar 00 30 Jun 00 30 Sep 00 31 Dec 00 30 Mar 01
10 Liquid Operating Monies 0 Long-Term Operating Monies
G:\excel.dta\8n\2220\geggi\Finance\investmgmtprogmm
LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
Orange County Sanitation District
Summary ln(ormatton II/J3y. 0 03/J1L2001 80 Quality ounlaznlro
Total Markel Value(MM) $363.4 $382.7 70 rti 67 11031314am
Quarterly Contrihutions(MM) $0.0 $9.4 as 60
Estimated Annual income(MM) $22.5 $22.6 50
Estimated Duration(yn)' 2.2 2.3 40
i 30 2122
Estimated Yield to Maturity 1%) 6.2 % 5.1 % 20
Average Maturity(yrs) 3.6 3.6 10 o s 0 0 7 6 0 0 o a o 0 0 0
Average QualltY_..._........_.................... . AA+__ __.. AA+_ 0
AVm oelnw AM M A oM HA n IMlawu
AIM
60 Sector' nIQ0201 60Maturity �oLilaWl
a° 50 44 SU 43
—p 40 4o
t1 30 L" -E'I--
11 R
20 30 2010 12
n n o 0
6
Law hag f." Non US$ ImetgWq (alter, Net not 0
H,,M, Markel, LXdv Ul yr. 1.1 yrs 1.5 yrs S.10y1 I0-20 rn 20syn
Coupon 12/31L2000 ➢3L31/2001 Deriral'vn 12L31L2000 1137av20➢1
> 12% 0 0 Gross Futurese 0.0% 0.0%
8-12% 4 4 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0
7-8% 19 17 Mortgage Backed 0.0 0.0
6-7% 59 43 Other' 0.0 0.0
5.6% 6 18
<5% 12 t0
Average Coupon... ..........:._._.. 6.4 h 6.1 %
........................
I ase ndalrmxl PoAnlinslmaln all lnke,eulllvity lady ge. I Intme,t ntc 111,a w I,Ihled nn rtltY allwtiv,he,of lelp,lanl ho rn,.y.—as.
2 trgales evalnymtln,WrW.o,dvdrma caning Werea4nward ronndooraaz
1 other Includes YaokeMmn taaxj,cono'HOlnandIrefsom sw1e;'Net Cast Iq jitalnx'etXtala cash o, ivalenls less ammminml et Lack rutje,%Imwad%and unswdea ludo.
4 Wrt, oleacked wonwes are ralq(owd It,weiglncl average llb.
5 lnrindesall Posen ere 6nnes and l uudellar hxurn contracts. Due to uw thrervntudh nsauldly of lla,U alollar futures contracts.lln nunawl vatosas Iteend10,10 Is,feast.
6 Serotines de,mdoed try inMCn to low Inlrnlially has daldc aurallm dnnrleridks,owh as In a M SWIn,Sgryaneuss CML,,and Irene I katm.
7 1 N,,,inrlmles—ailles waddt delve Ihelr value Imm nmlerlyo,Wvrrrl sales,strl,as rredll ytreada,swain alas nom U.S.&II allvea.
LIQUID OPERATING MONIES
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
Orange County Sanitation District
Summary.Information 12/31/2000 E131L2001 $
Total Market Value(MR $34.5 $35.0 6o Quality �mcnnm
Quarterly Contributions(MM) $0.0 $0.0 Zr s6 3049
Estimated Annual Income(MR $2.2 $7.9 40
Estimated Duration(yrs11 0.2 0.3 70 21 22 31�5
Estimated Yield to Maturity(%1 6.1 '% 4.6% 20
Average Maturity tiers) 0.2 0.3 108 Q � s
Average Quality AA+ AA+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
— _ -- -- --
nlml nM M n adaw nM BA n nr
nlm It
n
160 60
140 $CCIOrI 01
11
IIRWI 70 41 ■IU/11QWIalurilY M 01$n111
120 lomlw 60
2100 a° s0
e0 90
60 i 30 12
35
40 20
20 10 a S
0 0 0 0 u 0 n 0 0 0 a a 0 00 0 0 0
CoA W,, Can) Non US$ (111MI49 We, NrI CAlIV rile. 3 4 n. ban. 41$nm 1.f yn S r Ns
ImvNMr Mrkels M.Mite,
Coupon - 12/31/2000 O3/3.1/2001 Derivatives-- — -— 12131/2000 03=200.1
> 12% 0 0 Gross Futures 0.0 % 0.0%
8- 12% 6 5 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0
7.8% 5 6 Mortgage Backed' 0.0 0.0
6-7% 56 16 Other" 0.0 0.0
5.6% 32 25
<5% 1 40
AverageCOu�on..�:_............._..........::: __6.4%......__......5.6 .:..,..................,..............................................
.. -_. _._.._.............._�
I Mrasme M a l.nd.... lKn px a Imnl'n Prirr crnslllvllY to dunpes In hNrrnl rain. 11 Is a wdalnrA nralvrlly al Irmem wlue of all principal.xl nnereR payn.nl.a
! Lnluln quality rallnp Mrash npllvalrrxs l.dlnp lVlrnrMmvarAannrrlur.nb.
.1 tahrr Indmks YankrMmu Ixxnis,mnvmddn n prdrrml NmhN Nn Caur y Mmiry Markr0lndudn Chills,SIIl,CP,nA.xl❑)r,Irss anumnl.barF Lr.A luwrq Iwwan6 slot nnrrnlnA tracks.
4 Moopp.ha[hal seonlllea are eVMMYINl Iry wvlRhiol avnaRe life.
S A•anlllrx dorrmlowil by ISMCSI In love Llrvnlally lose'uhle toolloo'INar lrrlNX:r,v.h el, 11)a IV Stripe,Syrrxrrl d-e,CMIb,anal lumnx•I loalrn.
I, Celle ,,Inriniki......Moe Mddr doll-IIM,value Imnre slolylo,inlrrnl rate;n.h as cloth 4lo,oh,swalx and rnxr11.5.dedvallwe,
Prepared by Finance, 5H/01,2:53 PM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
7.00
6.75
6.60
6.25
6.00
5.75
W 6.50
i
6.25
5.00
4.76
4.50
4.25
4.00
E % 5
t2&Sep-00 29-1)eo-00 —a-30-Mar-01
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Flnance\FilstodcalTREASURYyieldmrve
� b,
FAHR COMMITTEE MeeIn ,Dab± TOBd.or Dir.
Ds/s/ol OS/23/DI
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iem Number
FAHROI-33 is
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael White, Controller
SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE
PROGRAM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2001
to May 15, 2002, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $75,724.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends the annual renewal of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage for the
District covering the period from May 15, 2001 through May 15, 2002. The Boiler&
Machinery insurance program provides comprehensive coverage for loss caused by
machinery breakdown and explosion of steam boilers or other covered process
equipment, including damage to the equipment itself and damage to other property
caused by covered accident. Sufficient funds have been budgeted within the 2000-01
budget to cover premium costs.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District's FY 2000-01 Boiler & Machinery insurance program provides coverage
($100 million per occurrence/$100,000 deductible)for losses caused by covered
machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, co-gen engines).
Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and improvements
caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the boiler& machinery insurance.
This program augments the District's all-risk property insurance which covers perils
such as fire, flood, and earthquake.
G I.dl.11rIc.ldAgene6 R.p IQXl B.Id Agenda k1WIW.9nem IS(B.BuleIns.eW
Rensed W20M Page 1
May 15, 2001 — May 15, 2002 Renewal Cycle
w
Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, has compiled their survey
of the current Boiler& Machinery insurance market and recommends that the District
renew Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage with CNA Insurance Company, the
District's current boiler& machinery insurance underwriter, for the period of
May 15, 2001 through May 15, 2002.
To analyze available coverage levels and premium costs, Driver marketed the District's
Boiler and Machinery insurance requirements to three carriers. Kemper Insurance
Company and Travelers Indemnity Company both gave preliminary indications of
approximately $125,000 to $150,000 at the same basic coverage limits comparable to
the District's existing program. However, CNA Insurance Company is proposing a
modest seven-percent increase over the prior year from $70,792 to $75,724.
Conclusion
CNA Insurance Company, with more than $2 billion in reserves, is rated "A"/FSC XV
(Excellent) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating agency)for its overall
ability to meet its obligations to policyholders.
CNA is a strong insurance company and can offer Boiler& Machinery insurance with
high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the District. Additionally,
they offer the most competitive pricing for the upcoming renewal period. Staff concurs
with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient funds are contained in the current
budget to cover premium costs ($75,724).
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Broker of Record Letter dated May 1, 2001.
MDW
G%w dNftegergaLLUard Agenda Redorr@MI Board Agenda Reel'islg5Al11ler 15111.Bpletlns.Enc
Remed elxona page 2
ROBERT E. DRIVER ASSOCIATES a Dirision of Robert F.Driver Co.,Inc.
Founded on knowledge, integrity and service.
ASSOCIATES
May 1,2001
Michael D. White, Controller
Orange County Sanitation District
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Re: Public Entity Property Insurance Program(PEPIP)
Boiler& Machinery Coverage
May 15, 2001 to May 15, 2002
Dear Mike:
We enclose our proposal for the May 15, 2001 renewal of the Boiler and Machinery
insurance program affording a $100,000,000 coverage limit of liability on a
comprehensive basis.
The PEPIP Program underwritten by CNA Insurance Company (A.M. Best Company
rating A (pooled), Excellent, Financial Size Category 15, Policyholder surplus greater
than $2,000,000,000) continues to afford broad coverage at competitive cost.
Although CNA's premium has been increased by a slight seven percent from $70,792 to
$75,724 annually due to restricting marketplace conditions, their quotation is
considerably less than informal "indications" of approximately $125,000 to $150,000
offered by Kemper and Travelers. Given that disparity, we did not pursue further
negotiations with these alternative insurers.
We accordingly recommend continued coverage through CNA and await your
authorization to implement coverage.
Sincerely,
ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOCIATES
i✓
Donald H. McLean
Senior Vice President
DHM:rp
Newport Beach
4041 MacArtlnv Blvd-#300. P.O. Box 6450, Newport Beach, Cahfornia 92658-6450 • (949)756-0271 • Fax(949)756-2713
Lic#OC36861 • uww.tfdriver.com
San Diego Escondido Sacramento Fresno San Francisco
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.of Dir.
r' 05/09/01 05/23/01
T AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item NUMW
FAHPOI-32 ON)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: INCLUDING ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON
THE 2001-02 PROPERTY TAX BILL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-10, directing the
County Tax Collector-Treasurer to include sanitary sewer service charges on the 2001-02
property tax bill.
SUMMARY
Section 5473 of the California Health & Safety Code provides that sanitary sewer
service charges may be collected as a separate line item on the annual property tax bill.
The District has utilized this method of fee collection since the inception of these fees.
The two principal benefits of this collection method are that the District does not need to
develop or fund a utility billing division, and that failure to pay these fees results in a lien
against the property, so all fees are ultimately received.
The Code requires a new Resolution from the District directing the County Tax Collector
to collect these fees every time the rates change. The rates for 2001-02 were adopted
on June 28, 2000. Although these rates were lower than or equal to those adopted in
1997 as a part of a five-year rate schedule, they are a change from the prior year and
this Resolution is required.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates,
and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees
collected, for the actual collection expenses. Annual collections costs are
approximately $220,000 or .3% of the sewer service fees.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
G:VyANYgendaBayd A n.flepwLs .3 EoeM PpnEa flepa1sW501Vlem 15M P.PT.t "dx
moms Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
Collect these fees with OCSD staff and a direct billing program. This is a more costly
alternative and one without a method to force payment.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. OCSD-01-10.
c%w d 0W,enda%BWM Agenda Re,tt A2001 Board Nanda ReWS%050nuem I 9)RWTa,BYI dX
handed: MMS Page 2
W
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-10
DIRECTING COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO COLLECT
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 2001-02
PROPERTY TAX BILLS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTING THE COUNTY
TAX COLLECTOR TO INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE 2001-02 PROPERTY TAX BILLS AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 00-24
WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, Continuing and
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and as amended by Ordinance
No. OCSD-15, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District
elected to adopt, impose, and collect rates and charges for sanitary sewer
services and facilities provided by said District, and established procedures
related thereto. The sanitary sewer service charges were set by Ordinance No.
OCSD-05, and amended by Ordinance No. OCSDA 5, as set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that
such charges, as adopted by District Ordinance, may be collected on the County
tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with, and not separate from, its general taxes; and
WHEREAS, as part of the budget preparation process, the District's
Management has prepared financial and engineering reports, setting forth
financial projections for providing the wastewater collection, treatment, and
disposal services and facilities to the District's service areas for Fiscal Year
2001-02. Said reports have been made available to the public for Fiscal Year
2001-02. The charges established by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and as
amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, reflect an allocation of the costs of
operation and maintenance, such that the charges do not exceed the estimated
reasonable costs to provide the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal
services and facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:
Section 1: Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition
218), as of July 1, 1997, sanitary sewer service charges are deemed
assessments. The sanitary sewer service charges set by Ordinance No. OCSD-
05, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, comply with the provisions of
1
t
Article XIIID, in that they are existing charges first set by the Board of Directors of
the District prior to November 6, 1996. The charges are not increased, and the
methodology for the rate is the same as in previous years. The charges are
imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs, maintenance, and operating
expenses of the District's sewer facilities.
Section 2: That the rates and charges set forth in Ordinance No.
OCSD-05, as amended in Ordinance No. OCSD-15, are affirmed or modified by
the Board of Directors, as consistent with the findings hereinabove stated, for
Fiscal Year 2001-02, in the following amounts:
Single Family Residential Rates
Revenue Area 2001-02 Rate
1 $80.00
2 $80.00
3 $80.00
5 $80.00
6 $80.00
7 $80.00
11 $80.00
13 $80.00
14 All Revenue Area 14 Costs Are Paid Directly By IRWD
Section 3: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section
5473, the County Tax Collector is hereby ordered and directed to include sanitary
sewer service charges, as adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and amended
by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this Resolution remains in
effect.
Section 4: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section
5473, this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or
repealed, or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established
by Ordinance No. OCSD-05, and amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, is
changed.
Section 5: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section 1 herein.
Section 6: That Resolution No. OCSD 00-24 is hereby repealed.
2
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 23, 2001.
CHAIR
ATTEST:
BOARD SECRETARY
3
t
V
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
April 9, 2001, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m.
on April 9, 2001. Members of the Committee present were:
OCWD Directors OCSD Directors
Iry Pickier, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair
Phil Anthony Russell Patterson
Larry Kraemer Jr. Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1
Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Directors: Directors: Dick Corneille, Bruce Chalmers
Wes Bannister - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
Others: Denis Bilodeau Bob Finn —Brown and Caldwell
Blake Anderson Jan Debay Michelle Tuchman — NCG Porter Novelli
Lisa Lawson Jerry King Richard Bell - IRWD
Bob Ooten Terry Lane—Garden Grove
Wendy Sevenandt Others: George Martin -Anaheim
William R. Mills Jr. Patrick Scanlon — Southern CA Water Co.
District Counsel Doug Biglen Mo Hayes, Bill Tappan — Parsons Corporation
Brad Hogin Steve Conklin John Carlson - Fullerton
Tom Dawes Kelly Rowe - KERA
Shivaji Deshmukh Eldon Davidson — Newport Beach
Jill Everhart John Collins, Fountain Valley
Cindy Gehman Fred Bockmiller— Mesa Consolidated
Jenny Glasser Tricia Jaiwbiak— Salomon Smith Barney
Clark Ide Ted Popowchak— CH2M HILL
John Kennedy Bill Everest— Boyle Engineering
Mehul Patel Debra Burris — DDB Engineering, Inc.
Laura Thomas Mike Rudinica - RBF
Ron Wildermuth
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint
Cooperative Committee meeting held April 19, 2001 were approved as mailed.
u
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes ;
April 9, 2001
Page 2 of 6
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
2. Value Engineering Study
Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that value engineering studies must be
performed in order for the Groundwater Replenishment System to comply for a state
loan from the State Water Resources Control Board, a value engineering study had to
be performed.
Staff engineer Debra Burris reported that the firm selected for the value engineering
study must be certified by the state. Two value engineering studies are required, one at
the 30% design effort and the second at the 70% design effort. Requests for proposals
were sent out to seven firms with two firms submitting proposals, Value Management
Strategies, Inc. and Mr. George M. Wesner.
She reported that a committee consisting of staff and groundwater producers met and
concurred with staff that Mr. George M. Wesner be awarded the value engineering
study. The groundwater producers also recommended that groundwater modeling and
pipeline reviewers be added to the Wesner proposal. Ms. Burris reported that with the
groundwater modeling and pipeline reviewers added, the proposed amount was
$65,530. Committee members discussed insurance issues and decided that errors and
omissions and workers compensation insurance should be provided.
Upon motion duly made by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Kraemer and
carried, the Committee authorized staff to award a task order to the George M.
Wesner team, adding a groundwater hyrogeologist a pipeline expert; and adding
a condition to furnish general liability, professional liability (errors and
omissions) and workers' compensation insurance for the 30% Value Engineering
Study, in an amount not to exceed $65,530 plus up to an additional amount of 2%
of$65,530 for the added insurance requirements.
3. Authorize Additional Permit Fees to County of Orange
Mr. Dawes reported that the County of Orange has requested an additional $25,000 be
deposited to replenish the trust account for plan check fees and county inspection fees
for the Groundwater Replenishment System —Theo Lacy Pipeline. He reported that
the agreement with the County of Orange that will be brought to the Committee
requires a deposit of up to $200,000 with any monies not used being returned. He
recommended that the Committee authorize $25,000 increase for county staff plan
checking and inspections.
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
April 9, 2001
Page 3 of 6
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried,
the Committee approved Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 201897
issued to the County of Orange adding $25,000, increasing the authorization from
$20,000 to an amount not to exceed $45,000 for plan check and county inspection
fees and directed staff to issue a formal request to receive a periodic accounting
of funds expended from said account.
4. Construction Management Plan
Mr. Dawes reported that several months ago the Committee discussed and concurred
that a third party construction management team should be retained the project. He
recommended that a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Statement of Interest be
sent to firms that have expressed an interest as well as other qualified Southern
California firms. He stated that staff would begin writing the request for proposals and
scope of work, while the RFQ process takes place. He noted that the selection on the
construction manager could be completed by September. He also described some of
the tasks that would be included in the construction manager's scope of work.
Director Anthony requested that a schedule be prepared and to define what "checking
plans and specifications" means to a construction manager. He also stated that staff
shouldn't assume approval of items discussed with, but not approved by, the
Committee.
Director Anderson suggested that specialty services, including material testing,
construction surveying, soils testing and electrical testing, be contracted by the project
separately.
Director Bilodeau discussed the staff proposed use of OCWD operations and
maintenance employees as inspectors on the project under the direction of the
construction manager and how the construction manager would feel about this.
Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Anderson and
carried, staff was directed to prepare Requests for Qualifications and Statement
of Interest and return same to Committee for approval.
5. Subconsultant Selection for Soecific Elements with the CDM Team
Mr. Dawes reported that a competitive proposal process for certain work within the
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM)Team design contract was previously requested by
the Committee for electrical and structural design support, architectural services and
computer systems integration. Mr. Dawes recommended the following:
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
April 9, 2001
Page 4 of 6
a. Electrical and Structural Design Services. With regard to electrical and structural
design, he explained that while proposals could be requested, the consultant and
staff recommend that the work be performed by either RBF or other members of
the CDM Team. After considerable discussion, the Committee directed Mr.
Dawes to follow the earlier direction given, i.e., to secure proposals for these
services through a competitive proposal process. CDM will approve the list of
firms scheduled to receive the proposals.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,
staff was requested to prepare a Request for Proposals for structural and
electrical services and list of architects for review by the Committee, with the
proposals to be received by the Consultant Selection Subcommittee for final
recommendation to the Joint Cooperative Committee.
b. Architectural design. Mr. Dawes reported that an RFP was sent out to eleven
Orange County based architects resulting in the receipt of three submittals in
January 2001. He requested direction as to where the Committee would like to
begin the proposal process, and recommended that the Consultant review
proposals for architectural design.
Upon motion by Director Anderson, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,
staff was directed to prepare a Request for Proposals for architectural services
and to include firms drawn from a wider area than the Orange County area. The
Consultant Selection Subcommittee will make a final recommendation to the
Joint Cooperative Committee.
c. Computer System Integration. Mr. Dawes recommended authorizing staff to
prepare a scope of work and solicit proposals.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Anderson and carried,
staff was authorized to prepare a Request for Proposal for computer system
Integration and bring it back to the Committee for approval prior to issuance.
Director Pickler suggested that the Independent Review Committee of Directors
Anthony, Anderson, Patterson, Donahue, Bilodeau and the groundwater producers
selected serve as the Consultant Selection Subcommittee.
6. Status Report
Mr. Dawes reported on the following:
• Introduced OCWD Senior Engineer Doug Biglen who will be working on
barrier facilities and pipelines for the project.
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes
April 9, 2001
Page 5 of 6
• Introduced Ms. Laura Thomas, an electrical and instrumentation engineer,
who was approved as a limited term OCWD employee to work on the project.
• Staff met with the Groundwater Producers Friday, April 6.
• The Public Information Subcommittee will be held tomorrow, April 10 at
9:00 a.m.
• Received $759,762.19 in grants for fiscal year 2000-2001 from the Bureau of
Reclamation.
Director Pickier stated that these persons would serve on the following committees:
• Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee: JCC Chair Pickier, Vice Chair
Eckenrode, plus one director each from OCWD and OCSD (appointed by
Directors Pickier and Eckenrode), and General Managers Anderson and
Mills.
• Public Information Committee: Director Bilodeau would be added as a
member.
General Manager Mills reported that the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee
selected the fourth Tuesday of each month at 1:00 p.m. at OCWD for meetings.
Communications Manager Lisa Lawson gave an update on the public information
program. She reported that about 200 people attended the March 28 Joint Board
meeting with 17 giving comments and nine persons responding by letter, phone and e-
mail. She reported that in order to reach more people, the public outreach program
should be continued and enhanced.
Mr. George Martin reminded the Committee that the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Board requests that future public outreach programs be held in the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Patrick Scanlon stated that the Groundwater Producers offer their support and
assistance towards the outreach program.
Director Bannister requested that staff investigate an owner controlled insurance
program for this project. Director Pickier requested that staff come back to the
Committee with recommendations.
Director King gave a report on the April 7 OCWD tour of rural northern counties and
their water concerns.
Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes j
April 9, 2001
Page 6 of 6
ADJOURNMENT
The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 14 at
5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis
Avenue, Fountain Valley.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeung Dare TGad.Gf Dir.
os1zs/ot
AGENDA REPORT Ctem Number Item Number
_ v
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
Originator: MarcoPolo Velasco, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. C-150
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;
2) Award a contract to Pioneer Americas, Inc. for the Purchase of Caustic Soda
Solution, Specification No. C-150, for the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30,
2002, with four (4) one-year renewal options, for an estimated annual amount not
to exceed $969,117.00.
SUMMARY
At the March 7, 2001 OMTS meeting, staff requested Board approval for price increases
from our current provider of caustic soda, Great Western. The OMTS Committee
directed staff to solicit bids through a competitive bid process for a new contract for
caustic soda to ensure the District was paying the lowest competitive price for the
chemical. The Committee's direction was in response to the requested unit price
increases from Great Western.
Caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) is used for odor and sulfide control in the foul air
scrubbers at both treatment plants and in the District's main trunk sewer lines. It is
estimated that the District will use a cumulative total of 2,162 dry tons of caustic soda
during fiscal year 2001102. It is projected that approximately 1,300 dry tons of caustic
soda will be consumed in the trunk lines and 862 dry tons for both treatment plants.
Under the existing contract with Great Western, the unit price for caustic soda is $515
per dry ton. Under the recommended new contract with Pioneer Americas, Inc., our unit
price is $448.25 including sales tax. This represents an estimated decrease of$66.75
per dry ton or about 13 percent.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The General Manager is seeking Board approval to award the Caustic Soda Solution,
Specification No. C-150, contract to Pioneer Americas, Inc. for an estimated amount not
to exceed $969,117.00.
G 1..d,.W,.nd.1e .�R...n.¢oas a..m ny..a.R... Z. 1111mn.osm. ..
Rewsed: en.ree Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ALTERNATIVES
There are no other feasible alternatives at this time. Caustic soda is necessary to
control odors and sulfides in the collection system and treatment plants and is the only
liquid chemical treatment method that can be applied to the trunklines directly from a
mobile tractor. All other treatment strategies require dosing stations to be sited in the
collection system. Staff is currently investigating other alternatives that, if successful,
may be available next fiscal year.
CECA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
OMTS Committee Agenda Report (03-28-01)
GI dl.N...d.18.,d ft-da Re1.Q001 Surd Apmda RoWOW1111.m RG I W d.
Re .d: &IG98 Page 2
9
OMTSCOMMITTEE MeedngDate ToX.Brd.
7/7101 3/28/01
AGENDA REPORT Item Numaer HOn NUMW
OMT501-11 I 12(n
Orange county Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Ed Torres, Manager of Air Quality and Special Projects
SUBJECT: INCREASE IN UNIT COST FOR CAUSTIC SODA
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1)Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great
Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-
01)for an increase in unit cost from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton effective
February 15, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $756,300.
(2)Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order
No. 100764 Issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda
(Specification No. 2000/01-01), for an increase in unit cost from $462.00 per ton to
$515 per ton effective on April 1, 2001, Increasing the total amount not to exceed
$850,000, if needed.
SUMMARY
The District competitively bid the Caustic Soda contract under Specification No.
2000/01-01. Caustic Soda is used to control hydrogen sulfides in the District's foul air
scrubbers at both treatment facilities and to control odors in trunk lines. The contract
was awarded to Great Western International for a one-year contract from September 1,
2000 through August 30, 2001 for a unit cost of $265.00 per dry ton delivered for an
amount not to exceed $470,300.
In a letter dated February 5, 2001, GW International requested a price increase for
caustic soda due to the energy crisis and the resulting increase in the cost of energy,
which has increased the cost of the chemical. In addition caustic is temporarily in short
supply. Per the letter from GW International, the unit cost of caustic soda will be
increased to $462.00 per ton. Subsequently, a second letter dated February 19, 2001,
forecasted another increase to $515 per ton effective April 1, 2001. Like the first
increase, the cost of energy and supply/demand of the market is the cause for the
requested price increases.
The District budgeted to consume approximately 1,775 tons of caustic this year. Due to
the increase in odor complaints, staff increased the use of caustic in order to control
odors from the treatment plants. This increase in caustic use resulted in the projection
of an additional 200 tons of chemicals to be consumed over the contract period for a 10
percent increase in use. The total updated caustic consumption is estimated at 1,975
dry tons.
r
To evaluate the requested unit price increases, staff reviewed the contract with the
present chemical supplier, surveyed other large agencies also bidding on the chemical
at this time, contacted the other major suppliers of the chemical, reviewed industry
chemical cost forecasts, and interviewed the District supplier to understand the reason
for the requested unit price increases.
The chemical supplier's contract allows pass through of abnormal costs. The data
received indicates that the chemical bids are rising sharply and are over $400/ton;
another chemical supplier told staff they could not match the proposed unit price
increases and that electricity costs have risen substantially; driving up the cost of
product; the industry forecasts reviewed by staff note price Increases will occur and will
be substantially increased depending on the cost of electricity; and staff met with our
caustic chemical supplier to verify that electricity supply and demand issues merit the
requested increases.
District staff and the purchasing manager recommend approval of Change Order No. 1
for an increase in the unit cost of caustic soda from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton
that will increase the cost from $470,300 to $756,300.
Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to increase the unit
price of caustic soda from $462.00 per ton delivered to a not to exceed $515.00 per ton
delivered increasing the contract cost to $850,000 subject to staff review of and
acceptance the forecasted price increases. Staff has included a 5% contingency into the
$850,000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The existing contract amount for caustic soda is $470,300. Based on the revised
chemical consumption and Change Order Nos. 1 and 2, the contract amount could
increase by $379,700 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 5, Page 12)
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None
ALTERNATIVES
Approve General Manager's recommendation for Change Order No. 1 and proceed with
competitive bidding process to secure a new contract. Initial contacts with other major
suppliers have resulted in similar pricing requested by GW International with minimal
assurance of 100 percent allocation.
t
CEQA FINDINGS
None Required
ATTACHMENTS
1. February 5, 2001 Letter from GW International
2. February 19, 2001 Letter from GW Intemational
MAE/EMT:bac/pjm
WB .dWagenoa'Board Agenda RepaM1 0001 Board Agenda Reports\0301\Item 121Q.00c
FAHR COMMITTEE MeeOngDate roeo.oroir.
y 5/09/01 5123/Ol
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number
FAHROI-31 is
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, INDUSTRIAL WASTE
DISCHARGER PERMITTEE CHARGES, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-
COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE
PERMITTEE CHARGES AND WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR 2001-02
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-15, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County
Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection
Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers,
Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05,
OCSD-06, OCSD-11, and OCSD-13:
a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 11, 2001.
b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-15 by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance.
C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and pass to second reading and public
hearing on June 27, 2001.
SUMMARY
In 1997, the Directors of the eight separate Districts each adopted a 5-year schedule of annual
sanitary sewer service charges through the 2001-02 fiscal year. In fiscal year 2000-01, these
previously adopted rates were set aside, but not rescinded, in some of the service areas and a
uniform rate was implemented. That basic rate for 2000-01 was $78 per year for a single-family
residence, and other users are charged a percentage of that rate based upon quantity and
strength of the average wastewater discharge. The previously adopted basic rate for 2001-02,
which is proposed for implementation, is $80 per year for a single-family residence.
Preliminary budget analysis for 2001-02 indicates this fee will be sufficient to meet our cash flow
needs. No Committee or Board actions are required to implement this adopted rate.
The Source Control program also contains fees for various services. Last year the Board
adopted a policy to base the Class I and II Permit User rates for flow, biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS) on the sanitary sewer service charge rates.
Tonight's action would implement that policy for 2001-02.
Last month the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services (OMITS) Committee
considered a charge for Special Purpose Discharge Permits that had inadvertently been omitted
during prior Ordinance revisions and recommended that the FAHR Committee reinstitute the
charge. The OMITS agenda report is attached and tonight's action will implement their request.
W1 Afta%gwda`E WAgeda Red SOOO1 ewN Agma ROWSW501111em 100M 15 do
R".: MOM Page 1
Finally, this action will combine various fees and charges that are currently distributed amongst r
three separate Ordinances into one. While the rules for the various fees will remain intact, the ,.
annual fee revisions will all be found in one document. A proposed Ordinance will be distributed
at the meeting.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
General User Fee revenue for 2001-02 is expected to be approximately$70 million, a 3.7%
increase from the current year as a result of these rates combined with service area growth.
The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for
minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees collected,for the
actual collection expenses. Annual collection costs are approximately$210,000 or.3% of the
sewer service fees.
Industrial Waste Permit User Fee revenue for 2001-02 is budgeted to be $6.6 million.
Revenues from the Special Purpose Discharge Permit program are projected to be $410,000 in
the first year.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
General Users and Background
In 1997, the individual District Boards of Directors adopted multi-year Sewer Service User Fee
Rates. These rate schedules were confirmed during the consolidation process through
2001-02. In 2000, the Directors voted to complete the consolidation by combining the books of
account for the various Revenue Areas, except RA7 and RA14, and implementing a single
sewer service charge.
In order not to raise annual fees for any user above those previously adopted, the appropriate
rates for 2000-01 became those previously adopted by RA3. These rates are based upon the
single-family residential rate of$78 per year. (Rates for other types of users are based upon
flow and strength average assumptions are set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-05 and OCSD-06,
and are discussed below.)
It is important to note that this action did not replace those higher rates that were adopted in
some areas in 1997. They were only set aside until such time as they may again become the
appropriate rates for that area. Setting aside, rather than rescinding these higher rates, will
allow the District to reimplemenl them at a later date, if appropriate,without repeating the
Proposition 218 notification and hearing process that was conducted when the rate structure
was revised subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee public participation process.
Because of other governance and service issues that remain unresolved, the Board decided not
to include Revenue Area 7 in this rate consolidation. Therefore, the 2000-01 rates for RA7 were
G:"AWa oendal dAoenN Repvs�lBMM Ags aRO� WldRm WON u.a%
R.O.: WOMB Page 2
' those that were previously adopted by District 7 and confirmed by the 1998 consolidation.
s However, for 2001-02 the base rate, the single family-residential rate previously adopted for
RA7, is the same as the rate adopted for the rest of the service area; $80 per year.
Non-Residential and Permit Users
In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate
structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates became based upon
wastewater flow and strength (BOD and SS) per 1,000 square feet of development, rather than
being the same flat rate per 1,000 square feet for all types of non-residential users. During the
past two years, staff has been monitoring the claims for fee reductions and has been working
with a consultant to evaluate the ratios for various categories of users.
This year, staff is recommending that the ratios be reduced from 41%to 30%for the"High Rise
Office"category, from 97% to 70%for both "Low and High Rise Retirement Buildings" Ratios
for"Light Industrial-Single and Multiple Tenant,""Research and Development"and "Industrial
Park" are all proposed to be increased from 30%to 50% as flows for these categories have
exceeded the estimates. A new category"Septic Tank Property"will be established at 0% in
order to facilitate the monitoring of these properties. These proposed changes will result in
increased costs for 3,368 parcels and decreases for 220. The net impact of these adjustments
is projected to be a net fee increase of$1.1 million.
Rates for General User Fees, those collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill,
have been adopted through 2001-02. The rates for fees collected from Class I and Class II
Permit users were not included in that action and must be considered annually.
In 2000, the Directors adopted a rate calculation methodology that standardized the constituent
rates (Flow, BOD, and SS)for these permit users so that they are consistent with the rates used
for the general user. The proposed 2001-02 rates based upon the single-family residential
sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat Flow, BOD and SS follow.
Dourest c
Permit User I Flow Per MG eOD Per 1,0009 Se per 101100 E uivalent
Class I and II SPDP 4.94 $185.07 $177.07 S80.W
The General Counsel has ruled that these charges for service are not subject to the Proposition
218 notification process.
ALTERNATIVES
Maintain the current rates for Class I and Class II Permit Users and the current ratios for non-
residential General Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee calculation. This would result in Permit
users paying different rates per sewage constituent than residential users, in additional user fee
refund adjustments and in lower than appropriate fees for some users.
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
GMy.EleNpm0elaeaE PpenN Fepm1512N1 emM/,psde eepwlsWAtYdm 18.OM ISAW
ae.,>ee: ermGe. Page 3
ATTACHMENTS
r
1. Ordinance No. OCSD-15
GGS:Ic
G. m.ftmamOm WAg""RGPN 051 O-N AW'new M'Y' mteas 15. Page
R .W:fl2m
LAW OFFICES OF
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
9
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: General Counsel
DATE: May 11, 2001
RE: Consolidated Fees Ordinance
This Ordinance, is a comprehensive consolidation of all of our fees ordinances
into a single document. Except for the few minor adjustments, as reported in the staff
report, this is largely a housekeeping measure, in that it re-enacts existing ordinances
and repeals them into this single one.
The major objective of this is to provide both the public and the working staff with
the ability to rely upon a single reference source for all of the fee and charge provisions
in effect for the District.
Any of the fees which have been adjusted are within the limits previously
approved by the Board, and are exempt from the provisions of Proposition 21 S.
The Ordinance is 28 pages long, but again I emphasize that that it is because we
have chosen to restate all of the Findings of Fact (5 pages), together with all of the
related sections on each of the four major categories of fees and charges.
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
GENERALCOUNSEL
TLW:Iam
cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson
Mr. G.G. Streed
RECEIVFD
OCsO
136033\1
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD —15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES;ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES
CONNECTION CHARGES; ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS
CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL
DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND
WASTEHAULERS; AND REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS.
OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, AND OCSD-13
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District ("District') has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-05, as amended
by Ordinance No. OCSD-13, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges for all uses, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted
Ordinance No. OCSD-11, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be
imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand
the use of the property previously connected to the District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted
Ordinance No. OCSD-06, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-13, establishing
miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance
sampling fees, and wastehauler charges; and
WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the
District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact
the existing Ordinances that establish fees and charges, into one
comprehensive, master Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN:
ARTICLE I
RECITAL OF FINDINGS
Section 1.01. Findings— Declaration of Intent. The Board of
Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly
described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and
engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings
supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance.
1
e
A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were
nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County
Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 at seq.). By
action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific
legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was
submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally
consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for
all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1,
1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one
single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County
Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The
District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts.
B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital
Facilities, entitled "Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan —
1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed
financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the
Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and
identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the
financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the
individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts.
C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan
were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption
of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance
with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66016, and other
provisions of law.
D. That the Predecessor Districts, during the years 1997 and
1998, commenced comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies to
develop an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which
studies are referred to as the District's "Strategic Plan", which was approved and
adopted by the Resolution No. 99-21 of Board of Directors on October 27, 1999.
E. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan
studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and
financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types
and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the
system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total
costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate
methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain
access to the system.
F. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in
reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan, are
2
' based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections,
wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in
each year as described in the reports.
G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this
Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction,
maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and
disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt
instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and
reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration
and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to
the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related
to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of
the District's systems.
H. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all
fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater
to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of
operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to
increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process.
I. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all
wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the
public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage.
J. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and
levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs
to provide a service to individual parcels of real property which have been
improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge
is the request of the owner of a parcel, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the
occupants of the property,to receive a service based upon actual use,
consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by
other means.
K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this
Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project,
as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the
estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and
California Constitution Article XIIID. Said fees are not new and are not an
increase over any fees presently in effect.
L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein
will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth
outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service
3
Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical
change in the environment.
M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein
are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer
and the service and facilities provided to each new customer to the District, a
portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes
to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2,
1992, and in subsequent years.
N. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted
Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD-
11, established Capital Facilities Connection Charges, formerly known commonly
as "connection charges' or "fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to
connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial
payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the
system, and for future facilities to be constructed.
O. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities
Connection Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an
excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users
who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the
established base line of authorized discharge.
P. That the Capital Facilities Connection Charges re-enacted
by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system,
and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each
category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to
each connected property by the District.
Q. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this
Ordinance are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to
each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the
service and facilities provided to each.
R. That the District is required by federal and state law,
including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment
Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
(California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.)to implement and enforce a
program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers.
S. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to
meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality.
4
T. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors
has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations.
U. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non-
compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the
District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial,
wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs.
V. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to
establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which
are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the
District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations.
W. That the industrial discharger, source control, and
wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not
exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger,
source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the
administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance
sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control
Program.
X. That all fees and charges established herein have been
approved by the District's Board of Directors at a public meeting, all in
accordance with applicable provisions of law.
Y. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt
under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of
Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15273(a).
Z. That each of the Findings set forth in Ordinances Nos.
OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSDA 1, and OCSD-13 are reaffirmed and readopted
hereat, except to the extent that they have been superseded or otherwise
amended by specific Findings herein.
ARTICLE II
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance
is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property
owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with
its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived
under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition,
5
construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and
interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the
construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of
administration and provisions for necessary reserves.
Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge.
Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance,the owner of each parcel
of real property located within the District which is improved with structures
designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request
of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's
system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the
respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of
this Ordinance, both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The
annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in
Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or
Industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property
use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown
on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the
applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual
Sanitary Sewer Service Charge for the commercial or industrial user. Table A
establishes separate rates with respect to each of the nine Revenue Areas, with
the exception of Revenue Area No. 14, as to which costs are paid by the Irvine
Ranch Water District.
Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that
the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and
payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be
relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain
circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a
rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in
Subparagraphs 2.03E and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a
billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C.
B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner
may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to
the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made
by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to
the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists
between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater
discharged to the District's system, resulting In an unfair valuation. Satisfactory
proof shall establish that either:
(1) The principal water use is agricultural or
horticultural; or
6
(2) The property is devoted to any other use
wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is
significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be
expected to be discharged by the class of property in question.
Satisfactory proof shall Include, but not be limited to, documentation
showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for
which the rebate is sought.
The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any
property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than
the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached
hereto.
C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may
apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the
District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the
amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof
satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing
error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof
shall include, but not be limited to, proof that:
(1) The owner's parcel of property is not
connected to the District's system; or
(2) The property has not been classified in the
proper land use category; or
(3) A clerical error has been made.
D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and
refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue
& Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of
four(4)years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill
claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect.
E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds
of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General
Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may
grant a full or partial rebate or refund.
F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the
application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an
administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee
shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any
7
other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County
Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund.
Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of
July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto,for the
District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates
adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of
such charges in any fiscal year.
Section 2.05. Method of Collection.
A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health &
Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph
2.05E below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be
collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and
at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes.
The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said
collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between
the County of Orange and the District.
B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or
payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has
underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District,
within four(4)years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may:
(1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the
County Tax Roll;
(2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any
amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a
rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or
(3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the
amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days
of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property.
Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be
allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance
No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer
Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same
manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B),
and 303.6(B)of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended.
8
TABLE A
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS
Single Family Residential Rates
1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02
Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR
Revenue Area No. 1 $ 96.41 $110.04 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 2 $ 74.00 $ 77.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 3 $75.50 $ 77.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 5 $ 84.50 $ 96.75 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 6 $ 79.00 $ 82.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 7 $60.00 $ 66.00 $73.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 11 $ 80.00 $ 90.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 13 $100.00 $100.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the
Irvine Ranch Water District
Multi-Family Residential Rates Per Unit
1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02
Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR
Revenue Area No. 1 $67.49 $77.03 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 2 $51.80 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 3 $52.85 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 5 $59.15 $67.73 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 6 $55.30 $57.40 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 7 $42.00 $46.20 $51.10 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 11 $56.00 $63.00 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 13 $70.00 $70.00 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the
Irvine Ranch Water District
9
TABLE B
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1.000 SF or Unit
1 Vacant Land Parcel 0%
5 Common Area Parcel 0%
6 "Hold" Parcel 0%
8 Equivalent to Vacant 0%
121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0%
122 Subsurface Parcels 0%
124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0%
125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0%
126 Vacant Comm.Area-IMP Alloc. 0%
201 Homeowners Exemption Addl. 0%
666 Unassigned Vacant 0%
777 Septic Tank Property 0%
112 Steel Building 7%
113 Mini-Warehouse 7%
58 Nurseries (Plants) 10%
100 Drive-In Theater 10%
44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17%
71 Parking Garage 17%
72 Paved Parking Lot 17%
110 Warehouse— Single Tenant 17%
111 Warehouse—Multi Tenant 17%
115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17%
116 Truck Terminal 17%
33 Church Buildings 20%
94 Department Store 23%
95 Discount Store 23%
96 Unattached Single Store 23%
97 Strip Store 23%
74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27%
36 Financial Buildings 27%
40 Health Club 29%
68 High Rise Office 30%
21 Automobile Dealership 41%
22 Auto Repair Shop 41%
23 Automotive Service 41%
24 Used Car Lot 41%
39 Golf Course 41%
57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41%
83 Automotive Service Station 41%
10
TABLE B (CONTINUED)
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit
84 Marine Service Station 41%
86 Combin:ServiceStation/Convenience 41%
65 Single Office Bidgs.to 3 Stories 41%
66 Small Office Center 41%
67 Office Complex 41%
69 Converted Residence to Office 41%
7 Mobile Home 50%
55 Mobile Home Park 50%
107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 50%
108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50%
109 Research and Development 50%
114 Industrial Park 50%
37 Fraternal Buildings 51%
101 Unattached Theater 51%
26 Airport and Related Buildings 53%
45 Marinas 53%
88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53%
3 Two or More Residences 70%
10 Duplex Only 70%
11 Triplex Only 70%
12 04-Units Only 70%
13 5 to 16 Units 70%
14 17 to 25 Units 70%
15 26 to 40 Units Only 70%
16 41-99 Units Only 70%
17 100 or More Units 70%
18 Developed with a Mix of Farms 70%
63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70%
64 High Rise Retirement Building 70%
81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82%
82 Private Schools 82%
98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82%
99 Store with Office Upstairs 82%
118 Governmental Use VacantlDevelop. 82%
19 SFR With for 2 rental units 85%
34 Dormitory 97%
42 Hospital 97%
43 Hotel 97%
56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97%
11
TABLE B (CONTINUED)
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit
0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100%
2 One Residence 100%
4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100%
85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100%
103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100%
104 Food Processing Plant 100%
105 Cold Storage Plant 100%
106 Factory 100%
119 Public Utility 100%
120 Water Mutual or Company 100%
888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100%
32 Cemetery&Related Buildings 101%
38 Funeral Home 101%
60 Nursing Home 102%
61 Convalescent Hospitals 102%
62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102%
28 Bowling Alleys 112%
92 Skating Rinks 112%
50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124%
51 Small Medical Center 124%
52 Medical Center Complex 124%
53 High Rise Medical 124%
54 Converted Residence to Medical 124%
89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139%
20 Amusement Parks 144%
35 Entertainment Center 144%
73 Recreation 144%
30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151%
47 Supermarket 151%
48 Convenience Market 151%
90 High Flow Shopping Center 226%
76 Restaurant-Take Out 300%
77 Restaurant-Coffee Shop 600%
78 Restaurant-Dinner House 600%
79 Restaurant-Conversion from SF 600%
29 Conventional Car Wash 796%
NOTE: Multiply the applicable percentage figure by the Table A Single Family
Residential Rate for the applicable Revenue Area, in order to determine the
rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user.
12
ARTICLE III
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance
is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly-
connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously
connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this
Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction,
maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal
facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to
repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said
sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for
necessary reserves.
Section 3.02. Definitions.
A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities
necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing,
planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property,
construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair.
B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non-
discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the
District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use
is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence
at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in
the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. The Supplemental
Capital Facilities Connection Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, and
3.09 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly
or annual basis, as determined by the District.
C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to
physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to,
installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the
connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials,
and overhead for the installation of those facilities.
D. "Non-discriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the
same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non-
public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the
District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon
the proportionate share of use of those facilities.
13
E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its
agencies, the State or any of its agencies,the Regents of the University of
California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority,
or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State.
Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required.
A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units,
buildings, and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's
sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local
municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage
facilities and laterals to the District's facilities.
B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose
Discharge Permit under Sections 305—305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as
amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service
agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless
the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the
boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency
authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as
authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the
boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes
application for the issuance of such permit.
There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's
sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained.
Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment
Reguired. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage
facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage
facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued
unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a
valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said
property.
Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment.
A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system
facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all
construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt
from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and
prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within
14
the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy.
B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect
to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute
discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority
of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with
the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in
installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate
on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%)percent per annum, and that
the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property.
Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of
Amounts. Every person or entity newly-connecting any building or structure to
the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the
amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge:
Significant Commercial— Industrial Users—Definitions.
A. A Significant Commercial— Industrial User("SCIU") is any
person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but
excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per
day("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds
per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is
required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No.
OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or
significant discharges.
B. An Existing SCIU is any SCIU discharger connected and
discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000.
C. A New SCIU is any discharger who connects and discharges
to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after
January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in
Subparagraph 3.07A above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow,
or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU.
D. The maximum discharge allowed to a user,for which a base
Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, attached hereto, is
25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base
use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this
Subparagraph 3.07D shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09
hereof.
15
E. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed
discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1,
2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99,
or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative
of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who
are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste
Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum
baseline established as follows: Flow—25,000 gallons per day; BOD— 150
pounds per day; and SS— 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to
discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of
a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge.
F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as
prescribed by Sections 3.08 and 3.0 below, shall be payable commencing with
the effective date of this Ordinance.
G. Within two (2)years from the date of the District's written
notice to the SCIU of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal
the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the
General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion,
based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not
representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly
period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent
basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager.
The decision of the General Manager shall be final.
Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New
Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, attached hereto, for
commercial— industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound
of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the following
amounts:
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge.,
Existing Significant Commercial— Industrial Users.
A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users
connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either(i)
16
an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day
over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or(ii) an increase
of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per
day, whichever Is lesser, over its established baseline authorization.
B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall
be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in
Section 3.09A above:
Daily Charge
Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057
BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461
SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025
C. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall
be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of
the User's baseline. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for
a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District.
Section 3.10. _Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement
Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate
basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C,
attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that
would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed.
Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled
Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system
facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase
the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and
paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the
amounts as set forth in Table C, attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the
amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as
prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use.
Section 3.12. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-
Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A
charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the
District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement
Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner,
shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a
Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in
said Agreement shall be the amount due,whether the original Agreement is still
in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital
17
Facilities Capacity Charge shall be In addition to the other Capital Facilities
Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.09 herelnabove,
established for property connecting to said facilities.
Section 3.13. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity
Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of
property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change
of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any
other parcel of property.
Section 3.14. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed
discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such
previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or
subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay
Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section
3.08 above.
TABLE C
CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES
Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge
Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet'
Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00'
Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.00'
High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.001.2
Single Family Residential Per Unit
5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00
4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00
1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130.00
Multi-Family Residential Per Unit
4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00
3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00
2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00
1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00
Studio Per Unit $ 580.00
Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new
construction shall be $1,820.00; and all calculations shall be on a per square foot
basis.
18
2The Base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is established at $1,600.00 per
1,000 square feet, but shall be incrementally increased from the present amount
at five (5) levels, and five (5)time periods as follows:
Effective September 1, 1999 $ 675.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective January 1, 2000 $ 900.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective July 1, 2000 $1,130.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective January 1, 2001 $1,360.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Effective July 1, 2001 $1,600.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.
A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specked herein will be on
file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building
Department of each City within the District.
'Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries;
Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV
Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in
volume to these listed categories.
"High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants,
Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping
Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and
other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories.
"'All other connections are Averacte demand users.
19
ARTICLE IV
MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING
TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS. SOURCE CONTROL
PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS
Section 4.01. Puroose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance
is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i)on account of industrial
dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (it)when
administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii)when performing
non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated
the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of
the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this
Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i)on account
of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks.
Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to
Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby
established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table D, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4.03. Industrial Discharger, Source Control. and Non-
Compliance Sampling Fees. Industrial discharger, source control, and non-
compliance sampling fees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth
in Table E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for
Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater
Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended,
charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge
Permittees, as set forth in Table F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees — Charges for Use.
As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's
Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as
amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II
Permittees as set forth in Table F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by
Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations
adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are
hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table G, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
20
Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals.
A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any
decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of
the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant
to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees.
Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit
applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the
reconsideration request.
B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected
by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in
accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge
Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended.
TABLE D
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES
RELATING TO PERMITTEES
Permit Fees Charges
A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335.00/year
B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $70.00/year
C. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/year
D. Special Purpose Discharge Permit -
One-Time Application $975.00/permit
E. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75.00/year
Wastehauler Fees Charges
F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00
G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00
H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00
1. Entry Card Replacement $100.00
J. After Hours Discharge— Prearranged $85.00/event
K. After Hours Discharge— Emergency $100.00/event
21
TABLE D (CONTINUED)
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES
RELATING TO PERMITTEES
Administrative/Processing Fees: Charges
L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit
M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit
N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal
22
TABLE E
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL
AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES
Charge
Cost of Processing and Sampling
Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event
Cost of Processing and Sampling
Following a Major Violation $500.00/event
Cost of Analysis Charge
Heavy Metals: $35.00/each
-Aluminum
-Antimony
-Arsenic
- Cadmium
- Chromium
- Copper
- Gold
- Lead
- Molybdenum
- Nickel
- Palladrum
- Platinum
- Selenium
- Silver
-Thallium
-Zinc
Mercury $78.00
601/602 $152,00
604 $223.00
606 $254.00
608 $523.00
610 $73.00
612 $200.00
624 $355.00
625 $661.00
Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $21.00
Biochemical Oxygen Demand ('BOD") $44.00
BOD and Suspended Solids ("SS")Analysis $67.00
Chemical Oxygen Demand $44.00
Conductivity $15.00
23
TABLE E (CONTINUED)
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL
AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES
Charge
Cyanide (Amenable) $70.00
Dissolved Mineral Solids $15.00
Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00
Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $50.00
Tritium Determination $50.00
Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) $74.00
Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) $74.00
Total Organic Nitrogen $48.00
pH $8.00
Fluoride $51.00
Suspended Solids (Total) $23.00
Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $44.00
Total Dissolved Solids $14.00
Total Sulfides $29.00
24
TABLE F
CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND
SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES
CHARGES FOR USE
Revenue Area Flow (') S.S.. (") B.O.D.('")
Revenue Area No. 1 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 2 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 3 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 5 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 6 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 7 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 11 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 13 $224.94 185.07 177.07
Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area 14 operations and maintenance costs
are paid directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District
` Flow - Per million gallons of flow
" S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
"'B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand
25
TABLE G
WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE
Wastehauler Fees Charaes
Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of
within Orange County truck capacity
Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of
outside Orange County truck capacity
26
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this
Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD-
01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of
District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees
related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees
Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District
Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith.
Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall
apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties
otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions
of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public
agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein.
Section 5.03. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the
application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court,the
remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons
or other circumstances, shall not be affected.
Section 5.04. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty
(30) days after adoption.
Section 5.05. Repeal. Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06,
OCSD-11, and OCSD-13 are hereby repealed.
Section 5.06: Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the
Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary
to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law.
27
PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the
Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting
held 2001.
CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL
28
FINANCIAL
REPORT
0 00) 14,1/8.89! 2,889.66 M44.94 31-067.49__ - (1
• 19h,921.79 21,287.24 56,713.47 59,037.15 ---10,653,-47- -11,4,
0 �.010,432.11 217,327.71 519,004,44 602,727-5' � 764.38 116,81
0 256,403.79 27,717.25 73,84417p 76,86`. .85 13 1.45 14,8'
.00 (324,432.70) "=. ,34 .76 ,/64 94 . -2 -,i..41 - (8,61
•. .00 4,1 o.8 l2 M 66, (2,044.y9) (3,067,49) 1
•'. 59 2q,59= _ 1m3S wr rNa 1a9 89 1 652. 19 9,2'
142 --(21,440.31). 0,1
• 916.11) (316,7i
MAL :82 19-- 481.7`
GL T^TRL 25;' 6 „ �� 315,287.50 7,6 47 1.475.7`:
• CURRENT ; 1., 1; /
NEW 7. .'
N 4 25.40 . ` 1,475.7`'
LEI'
1 1
• 004;'14.84 89,72104 302.419.17 310,456.89 6 ',220.'4
a , _ - - -
• D J
A �
N
Orange County Sanitation District,
California
o?i
EMNAP
r
Table of Contents
,y. Section 1 -Overview...................................................................................................................1
FinancialReport-
Section 2 -Joint Operating Budget Review
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2
y Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3
Summaryof Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................8
Summaryof Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8
Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9
r
Section 3-Capital Improvement Program Review
r
Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life........................6
Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area
w Summary Budget Reviews -All Revenue Areas....................................................................1
Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2
r Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3
RevenueArea No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4
Section 5- Self Insurance Budget Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2
n
V
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
W
v
Fb
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
y
w
iy
u
bl
b
W
Overview
Third Quarter Financial Report
March 31, 2001
r
The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2000-01 third quarter
r comprehensive financial report. This report provides the Directors, staff, and the
general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District
and reports on the status of all capital projects in progress. A summary of the sections
contained within this report is provided below.
Joint Operating Budget Review: At March 31, 2001, 76.11 percent, or$35.0 million
w of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of$46.0 million has been expended. This is a
net increase in costs of 6.71 percent, or$2.2 million from the same period last year.
There are two main reasons for this increase in net costs: 1) During the second
.> quarter of fiscal year 2000-01, a large retroactive adjustment was made to the amount
charged to SAW PA in the prior year which resulted in a $685,000 reduction of prior
year revenue being recognized as a reduction to current year revenue. Additionally, the
current year charges to SAW PA of$756,300 are significantly lower than anticipated at
40.60 percent of the $1,862,650 budget. The prior year's over-estimated accruals and
the current year's shortage are due to the decrease in the strength (B.O.D. and T.S.S.)
r of the discharge flow from SAWPA. 2) As further explained below, the costs of
chemicals used for odor control and the cost of natural gas have risen significantly over
the prior year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2001 is $518.25 based on flows of 67.56
billion gallons, or 246.55 million gallons per day. This is$3.85, or 0.75 percent above
the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. This overage is due to net expenses
being 1.48 percent or$511,200 higher than the budget through March 31, 2001. This is
offset slightly by flows being 0.63 percent higher than the budgeted amount of 245
million gallons per day.
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 2001 include:
Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 72.68
percent of budget through March 31 while staffing was 7 full-time equivalents
(FTE's), or 1.37 percent below the total 510 FTE's approved in the 2000-01 budget.
Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year-
end.
Membershios— Membership expense totaled $175,200, or 94.42 percent of budget,
as of March 31 because a majority of the District's memberships are due in the first
half of each year.
• Notices & Ads— Expenses for notices and ads were at 151.49 percent, or$46,400,
of the 2000-01 budget of$30,600 due to searches to fill several vacant positions.
r
Section 1 - Page 1
�1
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
6d
• Chemicals—Costs for chemicals, including those used for sulfide and odor control,
total $3,515,000 through March 31, and are at 91.83 percent of the composite
$3,827,900 budget due to the cost for chemicals being much higher than was
anticipated when the budget was prepared.
• Gasoline. Diesel & Oil —At March 31, costs for these fuels are at 166.45 percent of
the $187,300 budget. Neither the compressed natural gas (CNG) purchases,
totaling$158,400 through March 31, 2001, nor the more than offsetting CNG sales
of$239,150 were budgeted for 2000-01. u
• Solids Removal —Through March 31, the cost for solids removal totaled $4,026,000,
or 80.52 percent of the $5,000,000 budget, primarily due to higher costs than were v
anticipated when the budget was prepared.
• Professional Services—Audit & Accounting— Through the third quarter, audit and
accounting expenses of $42,600 are at 93.63 percent of the $45,500 budget due to
the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and
second quarters of each year. w
• Professional Services— Other—Through March 31, the costs for other professional
services are only at 38.36 percent of the$1,372,500 budget due to some of the
budgeted projects occurring in the last part of the year. Consulting projects related
to the compensation and classification study and the District's biosolids
management program have not incurred significant costs as of March 31.
• Research & Monitoring— Research and monitoring costs are at 80.47 percent of W
the $2,135,500 budget due to the timing of when annual fees for participation in
research organizations are paid. Staff expects to approximate budget at year-end.
• Service Maintenance Agreements—As of March 31, costs related to service 4
maintenance agreements are only at 39.10 percent of the $1,383,450 budget due to
the timing of when many of the agreements are renewed. L
• Utilities—As of March 31, utility costs totaled $3,546,200, or 112.75 percent of the
$3,145,250 budget primarily due to the large increase in cost for both natural gas
and electricity since the budget was adopted.
• Other Non-Oceratina Expense— Due to the timing of a variety of miscellaneous r
expenses, other non-operating expenses are at 95.98 percent of the$84,250
budget. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end. L
64
L
Section 1 - Page 2
u
Overview
Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results
With Year-End Actuals (Budget)
Last Five Years
�,n
518,25 s4l0
686A1 SW.25
e16N Y1.90
666.1s
6W-
600-
9W3rd —
9&8) 8&8Y 93ia Ann
Qr Yeeend on Year 3elQ, Year 3wdQ, Yeer 3,e Mnuet
Qr end Otr end alr aM pr end Ou Budget
As demonstrated in the graph above, the cost per million gallons at the end of the third
quarter has been within 3.50 percent of year-end totals for three out of the last four
years. The cost comparison for 2000-01 is consistent with this trend as staff projects
the year-end cost per million gallons to approximate the budget of $514.40.
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter, as budgeted for 2000-01, and
as actually incurred through the third quarter of 1999-00. All three charts are quite
similar showing little change among the current year third quarter actual, current year
budget, and prior year third quarter actual.
More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2
provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third
quarter for the last three years; Section 2— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses
by department for March 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001; Section 2 — Page 4 provides a
summary of expenses by major category through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2
— Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through March
31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2 — pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line
item through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 8 provides a summary of
expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 9
provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized,
actual positions filled, and vacant positions.
Section 1 - Page 3
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Capital Outlay Review:
$90,000,000 _
$80,000,000
$70,000,000
$e0,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20.000,000
$10,000.000
$0
03/31/01 Actual Projected 2000-01 Originally Estimated
Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 2000-01 Capital r•
$42,360,300 $57,706,970 Outlay. $83,529,000
4a
As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $42,360,300
or 50.71 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 2000-01 as of March 31,
2001. Costs are proportionately low through the third quarter as many projects are still
in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are
expected to be $57.7 million, or 69.09 percent of budget at year-end.
w
Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay b
requirements incurred through March 31.
For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the
construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 6
through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the
project life.
Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At March 31, 2001, revenues from all Revenue
Areas totaled $104.37 million, or 68.96 percent of budget. Tax allocations and
subvention revenues, budgeted at $34.50 million, are at 69.45 percent of budget, or
$23.96 million, and Other (User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual
Revenue Areas, budgeted at$74.26 million, is at 56.29 percent of budget, or$41.80 a.
million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter
because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts
that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the
District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. No sale of capacity rights, budgeted at
$6.34 million, have been received because these revenues are not due to the District
until April of 2001. a+
r
Section 1 - Page 4
a.
Overview
Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at $4.82 million, are at 95.25 percent, or$4.59
million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Interest
revenue, budgeted at $31.41 million, is at $34.01 million, or 108.29 percent of budget.
This is due to both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than
were anticipated in the 2000-01 budget.
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $111.10 million, or 61.79 percent of
budget through March 31, 2001. The costs incurred related to capital improvement
projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer
Construction) are proportionately low through mid-year at $42.36 million or 50.72
percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. Additionally,
COP retirement and interest expense, budgeted at $40.74 million, are low at 64.22
percent of budget, or$26.16 million, essentially due to lower than anticipated interest
rates.
Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers'
compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is
utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability
claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions
based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims
ny administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $1,343,700 or 57.63 percent of budget at
,, March 31, while total expenses were $1,994,100 or 85.53 percent of budget.
w
ro
N,
u/
Section 1 - Page 5
V
2000-01 Third Quarter Report _
w
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
i�
u,
V
V
Section 1 - Page 6
V
Joint Operating Budget Review
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Engineering O 6 M
9% 55%
r Finance 5%
Comm. 1%
Into.Tech.
6%
Exec.Mgm1.
Tech.Svcs. H/R
I]% 2%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
2000-01 Budget
r
Engineering
10%
OaM
r 55%
Finance
6%
Comm. 1%
r
Into.Tech.
]%
Exec.Mgm1
2%
Tech.Svcs.% WA
r 2%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Engineering
9%
0&M
Finance 57%
6%
Gomm. 1%
Info.Tech.
6%
r Exec.Mgml.
2%
Tech.Svcs.
r 1]% WR
2%
Section 2— Page 1
r
L
2000-01 Third Quarter Report _
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
i '
W
2000-01
03731/99 03131110 Annual 03f31/01
Actual Actual Budget Actual
Flow In Million Gallons 66,521.09 88=00 89,425.00 67,556.00 IJ
Flow in Million Gallons per Day 242.78 240.83 245.00 246S6
General Manager's Department $ 13.56 $ 15.07 $ 17.52 $ 13.15 L
Communications 9.13 8.54 10.09 9.41 _
Human Resources Department 13.39 16.66 18.18 13.74
Finance DapeMe:nt j„
Finance Administration 16.98 16.31 1&95 15.72
Accounting 16.02 1528 14.84 13.94
Purchasing&Warehousing 11.72 10.57 13.85 11.49
Total 46.72 42.16 47.84 41.16
Information Technology Depanmera
I.T.Administration 3.64 8.25 11.43 8.88
Customer&Network Support 17.72 18.73 21.63 17.39
Programing&Database 6.01 6.16 12.67 12.44
Process CO Integration 10.72 8.03 11.44 10.38
Total 38.09 41.97 57.17 49.06..
Operations&Maintenance Department (J
Dime&Maint. Administration 9.34 9.40 4.75 6.46
O&M Process Engineering 8.71 11,82 12.08 11.36
Plant No.1 Operations 74.11 74.57 77.45 78.17 L
Plant No.2 Operations 100.43 105.85 100.52 114.88
Mechanical Maintenance 53.39 54.34 50.42 52.70
Electrical&Instumentation Maintenance 60.24 62.55 72.34 62.36 j
Central Generation 27.63 30.16 28.26 43.42 yj
Ai Quality&Special Projects 11.34 13.49 13.14 13.28
Collection Facilities Maintenance 22.92 25.16 16.45 16.09
Plant Facilities Maintenance 48.13 44.50 45.11 41.34 I
Total 416.24 431.84 428.52 440.06
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 8.92 7.86 7.89 6.74
Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring 31.86 42.94 40.34 41.63 V
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 32.08 39.21 40.36 38.79
Source Control 27.25 29.77 31.88 31.29
Safety&Emergency Response 6.93 9.24 1121 10.11
Total 107.02 129.02 131.66 128.56 y
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 3.29 1,18 5.18 4.77 -
Planning&Design 26.56 30.04 3Z30 30.53 I
Construction Management 34.96 35.16 3&97 34.79 L
Total 64.80 68.68 76.45 70.09
Total Joint Operating Expenses 708.94 752.94 78723 76521
Less: Cost Allocation (189.63) (199.49) (222.61) (209.70)
Net Joint Operating Requirements 519.31 553.45 564.62 555.51
Less:Revenues (42.75) (58.04) 150.22) (37.26) -
Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 476.56 $ 495.41 $ 514.40 $ 518.25 V
� I
Section 2-Page 2
u
Joint Operating Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
r
2000-01
03/31199 03/31/00 year to Data Budget%
Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 03131/01 Realized
General Managers Department $ 801,841 $ 998,083 $ 1,585,950 $ 888,103 56.71%
Communications 607,505 565,300 902,700 635,368 70.399/6
Human Resources Department 890,861 1,037,424 11625,580 927,944 57.08%
Finance Department
Fnanca Administration 1,129,813 1,080.077 1,894,860 1,081,032 62.65%
Accounting 1,198,725 11011,988 1,327,350 941,065 70.07%
Purchasing&Warehousing T79,452 700,353 1,238,800 775,966 82.64%
Total 3,107,990 2,792,418 4,261,OD0 2,779.763 65.24%
Information Technology Department
Intonation Technology Administration 242,452 50,154 1,022,3DD 698,427 58.64%
r' Customer&Network Support 1,178,701 1,240,865 1,934,600 1,174,881 60.73%
Programing&Daudmse 399,951 408,154 1,133,000 840.335 74.17%
Process Cud Integration 713.265 585.058 1,023,070 700,050 68.43%
t. Total 2.534.369 2.780,231 6,112,11M 3,313,693 64.81%
Operations&Maintenance Department
Opals&Meat. Administration 821,064 622,868 424,500 438,195 10276%
s, O&M Process Engineering 579,207 782.914 11080,100 797.142 71.03%
Plant No.1 Operations 4,929,884 4,938,483 6,926,000 6,281,797 76.26%
Plant No.2 Operations 61600.239 7,010,668 8,988,400 7,761,444 86.35%
Mechanical Maintenance 3,551,321 3,590,625 5,224,000 3.560,183 68.15%
d' Electrical&Instrumentation Miles. 4,007,284 4.142,536 6,469,350 4,213,042 65.12%
Central Generation 1,837,898 1,997,165 2,526,900 P,933,405 116.09%
Air Quality&Special Projects 754.649 893,331 1,174,SW 897,227 76.39%
�y Collection Facilities Maintenance 1,524,805 1,666,118 1,470,950 1,097.116 73.91%
Plant Facilities Maintenance 3,201,655 2,947,361 4,034,000 2,792,486 69.22%
Total 27,637,806 28.599.757 38,318,400 29,730,037 77.69%
Technical Services Department
1° Technical SeMces Administration 593.224 620,348 705,800 455.253 64.52%
Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 2,119,230 2,843,879 3,607,000 2,812,764 77.98%
Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,132,645 2.596.915 3,609,150 2,62D,445 72.61%
w Source Control 1,812,477 1,971,290 2,849,250 2,113,866 74.19%
Safety&Emergency Response 400,034 612,003 1,002,850 683,190 68.14%
Total 7,118,610 8,644.233 11.773,650 8,885,618 73.77%
Engineering Department
,.. Engineering Administration 218.852 23D,573 463,60D =359 69.53%
Planning&Design 1.708,178 1,989.411 2,888,300 2,062,154 71.40%
Construction Management 2.3211 2,328,419 3,485,10D 2,350,223 67.44%
.� Total 4,310,589 4,548,403 6.837,000 4,734.736 69.25%
Total Joint Operating Expenses 47,159,271 49,865.049 70,397,250 51,895,202 73.43%
Loss: Cost Allocation (12,614,168) (13211,857) (19,908,H00) (14,166,971) 71.17%
.r Net Joint Operating Requirements 34,546,103 36,653,992 50,490,650 37,628,591 74.33%
Less:Revenues (2.843,734) (3.843.725) (4,490,650) (2,517,433) 56.06%
Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 31,701,369 $ 32,810,267 $ 46.000.000 $ 35.011,158 76.11%
.e
Section 2-Page 3
W
2000-01 Third (quarter Report
i ,
u
Summary of Expenses by Major Category
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
W
Expense EVerse Invease Increase Percent
Budget Thm T1au (Decrease) (Deoreme) Budget Re ning .�
Oeaoipson 200001 03131N7 0WIM $ % Redlsd Budget
W
Salary,Wages;8 Bene61s $41,297,700 $30,008.255 $29.117.697 $ Ball 3.06% 72.68% $ 11,279.445
AdrWrilerafiveEKparvars 763,OD0 534,256 467,627 66,729 1427% 70.02% 228,744
W
Printing B Pmlieation 3WOM 275,190 246,960 29"0 11.43% 78.11% 7,,110
Training 8 Meetings 901,850 531,258 552471 (21,213) 3.84% 58.91% 370.592 �
Operelg Erpereas 4,712,960 4,,M,811 3.847,241 526,570 13.69% 92.8D% 339,149
Contractual Services 7.239,200 5,398.308 5.241.375 156,933 299% 74.57% 1.840.892
Pra4essiarral Services 2,115,500 1.088.067 1,374,106 (288,829) -21.01% 51.34% 1,029,433
W
Research$MorNaing 2,135.500 1,718,537 1,574,142 141,395 8.17% 80.47% 418,983
Repairs 8 Mairdemrxe 5291,50D 2815,930 3,383,651 (567,751) -16.70% 5322% 2,475.570 1 '
yr
Utifdiev 3.145,250 3,546,189 2717,978 B28,211 3D.47% 112.75% (400.939)
Odwr Maivials,Supplies,
and Services 2452,490 1,407,461 1,341,881 65,580 4.89% 67.39% 1,045,029
W Cost Allacatien (19,905,600) (14,166.971) (13,211,857) (954,814) 7.23% 71.17% (5,739,929) --
i
Total Joint Operating Expense 50,490,650 37,528,591 36,653,992 874,598 2.39% 74.33% 12,962,059
Revenms (4,490,650) (2517,433) (3.843725) 1,326.292 34.51% 66.06% (1,973217) ,
W.1.4,1 Opaeting ExWym $46.000.000 $35.011,158 $32.810267 $ 2200,891 6.71% 76.11% $ 10,988,842
Gallmaga Floe,WQ 89,425.00 67,555.00 66=00 1,328 2.01%
r.l
Gallonage Flow(MGD) 245.00 246.55 240.83 5.72 2.38%
GellonwWFlow($'sAFQ $514.40 $518.25 $495AI =34 4.61%
I '.
6w
i
V
6ri
Section 2—Page 4
W
Joint Operating Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
r %
ilevenue 1levenw Revenue Incnaee Invease
Budget Thm TMu Remeinug thru loeereeea) (neaeam)
Deapdpfl. 200D.01 03r31M 031e10n Budget 0301100 $ %
wl
Inter District Sewer Use $1,862.650 $ 71,315 3.83% $1.791.335 $1,853,199 $(1,781,884) -96.15%
Wastehauler 425,000 354,875 83.50% 70,125 302,646 52,329 17.30%
ar Sludge Disposal soo,000 504,329 63.04% 295,671 613.450 (109,121) -17.79%
CNG Sales - 239,150 WA (239,150) 2,522 236,628 9382.55%
r Scrap Sales - 146aB WA (12,686) 3,239 9.449 291.73%
Omer Sales - 12,069 WA (12,069) 9,274 2,795 30.14%
Rents&Leases 128,000 12B,163 100.13% (163) 121,659 6.504 5.35%
r General Non-Operatmg 75,000 189.288 252.38% (114,298) 63,237 126,051 199.33%
Vehlde&Equipment 300,000 174,360 68.12% 125,640 226,860 (52,500) -23.14%
Power Sales 550,000 427,636 77.75% 122,364 399,043 28,593 7.17%
Sampling Charges 350,000 403.560 115.30% (53.560) 248,696 154,864 62.27%
Total Joint Operating Revenues $4,490,650 S2,517.433 56.06% $1,973.217 $3,843.725 $ 1 326292 -34.51%
s
e!
r
r,
r
r
ry
Section 2—Page 5
r
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Eqxr,se %F Irvea,e Increase W
ON Thm T7eu Ranellning 71Tu Pacne w) (Oecleae)
Desorption 2000-M 03011111 03/41b1 Butlga 0301= S % .
Selades waves 8llerhflb y'
Salaries 8 Wages $34,69,70D $25,329.838 74.14% $ 9.009064 $24,658,248 $ 971,588 3.91%
Fmp104ee Bereft 4
Retiremeri Z400,90D 1,251,679 50.98% 1,176,621 1,575022 051,743) -MM
Crap hsw xs 3,614,50D Z595,859 71.82% 1,018641 Z337,878 257,963 11.03%
Tultim Rehnburserent - 55,778 WA (55,778) M197 (419) -0.75%
Union,Pental 69,20D 54,519 7978% 1401 50.301 4,218 8.39% L.
Workers'Carpestaw 310200 232.498 74.95% 77.702 232.500 (2) 0.00%
Urorpl%mert lmrance 53,B0D 16.086 29.90% 37,714 7,133 8,953 12552%
Total Bereft 6,448,000 4.178,419 64.e0% 2,M15131 4,M.449 (81,030) -1.gD% y
salaries.Wages,8 Baefits 41287,70D 30,DDSZ55 7268% 11ZMA45 29.117.697 898558 3.05%
Mete.SupoN,B SWA
l
AAriiNsbaBse 6Re>ses _
Memberships 185,5W 175,151 94.42% 10,349 131.143 44,008 33.58%
Office Fey-Suppliers 141,100 85,895 60.73% M405 90,093 (4,398) -4.80%
01Moa Expense-OOIe 89,30D 55,395 62.03% 33,905 57.412 ROM -am% ~
Small CarpiMr Items 250,000 168.090 6724% m810 1342D1 3),7B9 25.16% _
Mrrr Fwnihee.Fomrres,etc. 97,100 49.%5 51.42% 47.175 545M (4,653) 453%
PrhdhV 6Pubfication hhu
PepWrHWse 254,300 197,450 73.71% 66.850 181,325 8,124 390% _.
plvvlimskla 59.450 36392 6121% 23,058 30.766 5,626 1828%
Notate B Ads 30,600 46,357 151.49% (15.757) 3D,788 15,669 50.57% t.l
Paolo Rpcesng 7.95D 4,991 6278% 2.959 4,080 M1 2Z33%
Training B Meetirgs )
Meetings 223,850 143,907 64291/. 79,043 ism (91016) 3W% W
Trainug 678.000 387,351 57.13% 290,649 399.648 OZIM J.05%
Operating Fxp¢nsee
Chemical CoagWan6 1261.100 1,10D,980 81D.09% 260,120 9MO2 128,948 1327% v
Sulfide Cabd 1,435000 L316,795 91.76% 118214 1.041254 2MB22 26.46%
Clor Carnal 997,WD 110811148 108.35% (83.348) 1,061,409 19,739 1.85%
Chemicals-Colienwatco Open. 2D,00D 4882 24.41% 15,118 5.074 (192) W13% V
Msce0areas Charente 14,000 112M 80.16% Z777 M404 (11,161) -49.91%
Casafne,Cesel 30il 187MO 311,789 166.45% (124,469) 13Q556 17=3 128.31%
Tads IM700 83.485 69.17% 37215 113,734 OMM 2&6D%
Sdv,Paacte BJmi Suppries 43.950 3Z571 74.11% 11,379 31.478 1,093 3,47% r
Lab Oemnnls B Supplies 396,400 319,728 82.76% 66,672 348,771 (29.043) 41.33%
OBler Cperatigscloies 14Q710 Ili,= 7582% 35,471 114,519 (3M -288% --
(Cmtlrured)
V
Ls
Section 2—Page 6
u
Joint Operating Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Rem
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
r Expaee %Expavx EXWwe Ircleam Ins
Brdod Thu T ru pmmbdng Thu (Oaeca9e) ( )
Oasaipeen 200001 03131M COMM Budge 0ROM $ %
~ Canreeeud Sedcss
Sd'tt5 Renewal 6000,000 4,025,960 80WA 974.040 3,654,9W 351.057 925%
Other Waste D-40621 467,100 2M280 5893% 191,820 318,284 (42.984) -135l%
y l3aod.;lerying&Jariftft 410,000 309.704 7554% IOD296 210,857 3B,847 14.34%
Ouhda lab Sersk= 265,70D 151,477 5701% 114223 140,902 10.5E 7.51%
Oxygen Plard Ope 295,000 217,W 73.64% 77.773 210,116 7,111 3.38%
Other 801,400 418,660 5224% 382.740 64&333 (217,6M -M21%
^� Pmfeealala serve=
legal 42D,000 332,O7 79.05°/h 97M 3OZ,737 29.270 9.67%
Ault&Accmtr,g 45,500 4ZODO 9363% 49M 45,10D (2,500) -654%
Engneedng 277,500 185,014 6&67% SZ486 2SZ242 (770M -MAB%
COW 1,372,5W 528.446 3&35% 846,054 764,817 (238.371) 31.17%
fiesevdl&Mrs Ioing
Endromranal Mxdtaing 1,510.000 1,389,870 9&72% UQ130 1,23 ,657 133213 10,77%
er AhOua0yPwbff ring 75,ODD 74,9M 99M% 17 - 74,9M WA
Research smsm 273,664 49.72% 276,816 337,485 (63.801) -1&90%
Repairs It MmImmee
Materials&Ses4us 3,908,050 2275,056 5&21% 1,632,994 2,a72,329 (597273) -M79%
9c MC Pgremma 1,383,450 54Q874 39.10% 842676 511,352 29,522 5.77%
t15INes -
Taephore 251,850 149.561 59.38% 1OZ309 15&890 (7,399) 4.68%
ti Oiasel ForGwwatas 11.000 11,635 105.77% (635) 10,311 1,324 12,84%
Nabaal Cvs 1,130,000 1.780220 15754% (650M 969,485 82Q735 85.54%
Peeer 921,500 6M641 9394% 66,859 1,011,646 (145,90% -14.42%
Water =900 739152 saw% 91,748 SM746 1SR405 Z7.50%
M OKWCpea5ngsmplae
O&Ide Egip Rwlud 14Q1SO 113,984 77.98% 32196 W490 14,404 1457%
DWktE9up RMbd 32ZOOD 174,076 $4.08% 147,924 226,682 (5Z606) -2321%
�, Insistence
10,Oo0 773,03B 64.42% 42UM 719.M S%7T2 7.48%
Raw 5Z560 48267 91.81% 43Q4 41,708 6,549 15.70%
Mac Open"Ehpense 169,ODD 114,997 6803% 54PK4 109.840 5,127 4.67%
ACfvDOpea"Fees 12D,000 1OZ275 8523% 17,725 94,817 7,45E 7.W%
d Oearal Meege
C3dngecy 358.903 - 0.00% 358,500 - - WA
Pea year raslxgxa0an - - µA - - - WA
Otl1rcNmOpe 6werte 84,250 BQB64 M98% 3386 %(178 30.786 SLAB%
Mara,Supp,&Baru. 29.109,550 21,687,007 7450% 7,422,543 2Q74&152 93883 453%
Tarim A 0.Repelerads 70.397,250 51,695,252 7343% 18,701,998 49.8&9,849 1,829,413 &67%
r Nal COW Alloa6un (19,90Q600) (14,16Q671) 71.17% (5,739,929r (13,211,W7) (954,814) -72M
NeJ.0.Rdpmmieas SQ49Q660 37,52&591 74.33% 1ZWZ059 36,653.992 974,%9 239%
Lose: Aesene (4,490.65g (2,617,433) 5&06% (1,973217) (%M725) 1,32&292 34.51%
er
NatJ.O.Ehpadisxes $46,000.000 $35,011,158 76.11% $ lQ968,842 $3Z810287 $ 2200,891 6.71%
e4
Section 2—Page 7
r
W
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Increase Increase w
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease)
03/31/01 03/31/00 $ %
Treatment Process: y�
Preliminary Treatment $ 4,379,128 $ 3,896,551 $ 482,577 12.38%
Primary Treatment 3,628,879 3,342,701 286,178 8.56%
Secondary Treatment 2.821,213 2.518.875 302,338 12.00%
V
Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 419,384 440.321 (20,937) -4.75%
Effluent Disposal 398,533 476,894 (78,361) -16.43%
Solids Handling 15.898,166 15,046,812 851.354 5.66% _
Cogeneration 3.307,128 3,136,689 170,439 5.43% �
Utilities 749,780 802,003 (52,223) -6.51%
w
Electrical Distribution 390,674 461,323 (70,849) -15.31%
Miscellaneous Buildings 3,145,362 3,386,452 (241,090) -7.12%
it
Air Ouality 701,256 758,612 (57,356) -7.56%
Laboratory 1,689,088 2,388,759 (697,671) -2923% W
Total Joint Operating Requirements 37,528,591 36,653,992 874,599 2.39%
w
Less: Revenues (2,517,433) (3,843,725) 1,328,292 34.51%
Not Joint Operating Expenditures $ 35.011,158 $ 32,810,267 $ 2,200.891 6.71%. W
V
L
G
W
4
Section 2—Page 8
Joint Operating Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
March 31,2001
575 560 560
549
519
510
450
OWN197 06130198 0W30199 OWW00 0313112001
■Actual ■Vacant
r
r
r
At March 31, 2001, the total head count was 513 employees, or a full time equivalency of
502.50.
r
r
r
Section 2— Page 9
u
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
I
u
it
u
L
L
L
fi
L
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank u
L
L
It
L+
i
IJ
L
I ,
V
V
li
Section 2—Page 10 4
L
CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program-FY 2000-01
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001
St.r
vievz
Ig Svo],a9
4%
q% PrlrmYlreSrteY
S12.674273 J% R03 BJ]
r Cdl®Imi Milt la SevYlaYlr®ryes
57.662,466
r 5ad,Ndoo,
&Dl,illrl9n
B%
5 W]0 av5
Pr,a YW
P19M.
3o 2%
IS I811
1tM.199 0,001
yp IS 2%
r 559
5L92)652 unlnvSnrysloNeR
W de
Srg%
% 9L, 1
SJ.BOB.505 6JR .S
r M Iltrru& ya. 0.5g8 5&J�.2W R3%
S,CW'9Prgefs Prcad3 Rod. Pldt h.,RrdS n& ]%
v% Praeds cam39.alm
_. Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$42,360,273
vLM3.m2
calaya,snren
90%
r
5J.559.817
RA9sBbp7 No
8%
$10,7,764
Rae M.No..
2%
Total Capital Improvement Funding -$42,360,273
Section 3- Page 1
2000-01 Third Quarter Report u
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
200001 200DO1 2000-01 200001
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected LJ
Outlay 03131/01 Outlay Outlay
Collection System Improvement Protects
Collections
Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 9 64,000 9 12.278 S 51,722 9 51,200 V
Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 146,000 - 146,000 -
CaMlnuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 119,000 - 119,OD0 -
Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 68.000 - 68,000 j j
Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 234,000 - 234,000 - LI
Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer 210,000 86.230 123,T70 98,390
Carbon Cnyn Server and Pump SM.Abandonment 43,000 49.041 (6,041) 51.000
Santa Ana River Intercepter Relief Sewer 146,000 163.131 (17,131) 248.000 I
Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations 15,W L D 9,101 5,599 12,730
Santa Ana Rim Interceptor Realignment and Protec. 1,475,000 1,087,158 387,842 1.147,000
Taft Branch Improvements 7.000 7,000 7,000
Atwood Subtrunk Improvements 92.000 57,395 34.605 90,400 1I
Replacement of Maer-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 49.000 882,674 (833,674) B9QOW L+
Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer 11186,000 81,494 1,124.606 64,760
Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Server 2,214,000 341.819 1,872,181 341.820 -
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1 3,052,000 2,464,939 1,197,061 2.691,80D
Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station - 8,097 (8,087) 49,430
Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Westam Ave. 73,000 1.502 71,493 1,800
Big Canyon Oesita Sewer Rehabilitation 38,000 15,578 22,422 16.580
Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 1,768,000 119.802 1,648,1g8 145,140
Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 98,000 54.293 43,707 93.430
Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 118,000 54.179 63,821 78,20D
Rehabiia0on of the 14m Street Pump Station 188,000 72.119 116,881 88,560
Rehabilitation of the'A*Street Pump Station 193.000 622.392 (429,392) 649,400 l
Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 72.000 14.111 67.889 54.800 y
Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 46,00D 9.241 36.769 41,130
Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal,Beware 23.703 (23.703) 33,000
Goldenwesl Trunk Sewer Replacement 1,310,000 872,668 437.334 944,050
Heil Avenue Interceptor 1,944,000 2.998.682 (1,054,682) 3,368,500 L
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 1T7,000 107,977 9,023 297,500
Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy. 51,000 - 51,000 -
Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 25,000 6.838 18.162 38,820 f
Capital Improvements,Collections 14.000 - 14,000 V
Realignment of S.Anaheim Rd - 40,505 (40,50(1) 40,550
Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehabilitation - 3,483 (3,483) 3,500
Replace SARI Control Gate - 81881 (8,881) 8,900 L
Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab. - 702 (7021 710
Miller-Holder Improvements 592,867 (592.857) 592,860
Relocation of Lida Pump station - 101.116 (101.116) 101,120
Goldenwest St.Saver Replacement - 2.238 (2,238) 2,250 �,
New Pump Project-Edinger Pump Station - 54,158 (54,158) 54,200 L
1-5 Freeway Widening 259 (259) 260
Newport Boulevard and Pack Coast Highway Widening - 1.339 (1,339) 1,340
Huntington Beach Sewer Abandonment - 1,781 (1,781) 1,800 1
Subtotal-Collections 15,945,000 11,053,730 4,781,270 12,400,310 L✓
Revenue Area 7
Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations-Area 7 4,000 4,482 (482) 6,270
Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment 66,000 3.115 62,885 3.120 L
Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. - 13,177 (13,177) 50,800
Tustin Airbam-Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 234.000 1,520 232,480 1,520
McCaw Subtrunk Sewer 8 Pump Station Abandonment 23.000 - 23,000 - i
W
I
u
Section 3-Page 2 L
CIP Review
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
2000-01 2000-01 2000.01 2000-01
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay 03131/01 Outlay Cull
Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach*A" 236,000 S5,288 10%114 Irm
Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach'B" 69,000 8,557 60,443 12,000
r Tustin Trunk Improvements 59,000 7,190 51,810 12,000
Orange Trunk Improvements 166,0(10 59,207 106.793 90,000
West Trunklmprovements 9,000 1,749 7,251 3,000
Gisler-Redhill NOM Trunk Improvements 228,000 92,921 136,079 120,000
Mein-Baker Force Main ventilation 30,D00 - 30,000 -
Improvements to Main SL P.S, - 14,753 (14,753) 14,760
College Ave PS Parallel Force - 777 (777) 2,00D
Bubbler System Upgrade for 3 Pump Stations - 33_00,7.6 (3,076) 3,100
s+ Subtotal-Revenue Areal 1,124,000 aua,elu 828,1e0 448,570
Revenue Area 14
Tustin Airbase-Armstrong Subounk Sewer 688,000 3,909 584,091 3,910
r Improvements to Main St.P.S. - 37938 (37.938) 37,940
Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 588,000 41 7 546,153 41,850
Total Collodion System Improvement Projects 17,557,000 11,401,387 6,155,613 12,890,730
Treatment&Disposal Prelude
Collections Facilities
Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 634,000 358,883 175,117 438,000
Co-op Projects,Inflow/Infilt Reduction 2,752,000 833.911 1,918,080 2,013,200
Transfer to Other Projects: (44,111) (44,111) -
Nuisance Flow Diversion Fee at Newport Dunes - 2,511 (2,511) 19,60D
SSES for Three Collection Areas 44,111 77,581 (33.470) 77,600
District-wide Geographical Information System CIS) 30D,000 - 300.000 -
r, SSO Training Facility 84.000 .8900000 10,00)
Subtotal-Collections Facilities 3.840.000 A88 2,3T/,114 215581400
Headworks
Grit Auger Replacement 809,000 847,749 (238.749) 931.430
Sunflower Drive Replacement 247.000 56,133 190.867 164,290
Headworks Rehabilitilion/Refurblshment 30,000 29,507 493 31,500
Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 133,000 SM721 (375,721) 580,520
Headworks Pump Improvement&Overhaul - 23,351 (23.351) 24,000
Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 26J43311 264311 27,000
Subtotal-Hwchvorks 11019.000 1.491,892 4722 2! 1,728,740
Pdmary Treatment
Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 247,000 85,819 181,181 222,400
�+ Pri.Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities 6,647,000 817,350 5,829,650 943,60D
Waste Sidevown,Pump Station Upgrade 567.000 - 567,000 -
ClwlarClerifierDriveReplacementtUpgrade 344.000 - 344,000 10,000
Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 80,000 - 80,000 4,000
.� Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364,D00 364,000 5OOD
Subtotal•Primary Treatment 8,249,000 903,169 7,345,831 1,1000
Secondary Treatment
Sec Treat.Monitoring&Cntn Sys.Upgrade 901,000 44,604 856,496 44,600
Remo Tridding Filters&Comma New Clarifiers 494.000 158,329 335,671 158,400
Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 312.000 - 312,000 -
Oaygen Plant Repiacament/Rehabllitaflon 110,000 - 110.000 20,000
Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 200,000 200,000 95,000
Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2,017,000 2 1,814,167 318,000
Section 3-Page 3
wr
V
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year r
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
2000.01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected W
Outlay 03/31/01 Outlay Outlay _
Solids Handling 3 Digestion
Demnering Bell Press Rebuild 210,000 105,871 104,129 105,900 u
Dewatering Belt Press Extension 230,000 7.095 222,905 7,100
Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 3,929,000 3,757.739 171,261 3,904,570
Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 2,632,OOD 3,425,331 (793,331) 3,684,740
Digestion 8 Deweledng Rehab./Refurbishment 66,000 - 66.000 -
Devhtedng Bell Press Rebuild 326,000 50.123 285.877 61.000 LW
High Rafe Digester Mix Pumps Mach.Seals 425.000 70,103 354.897 71,000
Bell Press Automation 91.000 14,121 76,879 141,090
Sludge Grinder Replacement 222,000 160,464 61,536 161,000
Tula Ranch AcAuis 1lOn/Biosolids Management Site 4.774.000 61,639 �4,r71122 36611 3,7D0000 �r
Subtotal-Solids Handling S Digestion 2- 90 7,662.486 8,242,514 11,8
Ocean Outfall Systems
Outlall Flow Meter Replacement 380,400 169,442 210958 315.020 'W
Peak Flow Management 484.400 188.634 295:766 208,150
Effluent Pumping Station Annex 859,200 347,956 511,244 478.000
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Oufall 36,779 (35779) 61.500
Subtotal-Ocean Outfall Systems 1,724,000 741.811 962,189 1,062,670 'W
Utllitysystems
Electrical Power System Studies 488,000 306,744 182,256 395,000
Standby Power and Reliability MOoficatlons 1,528,OD0 1,063,741 464,259 1,119,20)
Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 182 57,000 144,130 (87.130) 174,600 V
Imps To Can-Gen Starling Air System 62.000 107,114 (45.114) 119,930
Stomn Dram Database Development and Tagging 100,DD0 - 100,000 -
Central Damnation Automaton 101,000 6,543 94,457 26,800 1
Chemical Facility Mods.At Plant No. 1 000.000 897,784 (198,784) 993,100 kw
Plant Utfitles Rehabllita0on(Refurbishment - 2,881 (2,881) 3,000 30 Modifications to Elec.8 Control Systems 483,000 9,374 173,626 324,400
High Pressure Compressed Air System 74,000 42,790 31,210 61,790
Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 299,000 29,689 269.411 32.480 69
Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 312,000 159,813 152.187 215.100
Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120,0DO - 120,000 -
East and West RAS Elevator Upgrade 106,000 - 106,000 106.000
Electrical Facility Modifications 8 Safety Upgrades - 4.186 (4,186) 4,200 joy
Subtotal-Utility Systems 4.429,000 3,073.689 1,355,311 3
Odor Control Related Projects
Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 347,000 67.121 279,879 312.300
Faciftes Modificagons for Odor Control 380,000 165,453 214,547 224,400 0ol
Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 70.000 774,418 (704,418) 774.420
Automation of Foul Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 - 73.000 - --
Scrubber Chem.Feed System Mods. 430.000 127,200 302,800 170 200
Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 1,300,000 1,134,192 165,808 1 Lll
Plant Automation 8 Computerization --
Computerized Facility Rem.8 Dwg.System 909,OOD 1,408,103 (497,103) 1,783,550
Power Monitoring and Control Systems 374,000 5.132 368,868 17ADD 1W
Plant Reinvenllon/Aummadon Project 2.660,000 2,731.627 (71,627) 2,731,050
CMMS Programming 129.000 8.299 120,701 116,220
Document Management 559,000 22,393 536.607 100.380 1
Data Integration 559,000 117,273 441727 1961610 W
Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 157.000 25,768 131:212 29,420
Intranet Appllcation Development 138.000 1.934 134,066 6,170
Internet E-mail Browsing(Website) 91,ODD 4,716 86,286 18,050
Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 134,000 238,093 (104,993) 230.000
W
Section 3-Page 4
r
CIP Review
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
2000.01 200"1 2000-01 20l
Estimated Actualat Remaining Projected
Dun 03/31101 Ou�tla Outlay
Voice-Data Building Rewiring Rii 33,084 18,916 34,000
Records Management Program 165,000 142,080 22.920 152,560
r Source Control Programming 80,000 69,856 10,144 116.570
Geographic Information System 975,000 142,285 835,715 143,000
Automation Report Publishing 39.000 89.366 (50,368) 105,780
Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 284,000 7,G21 276,979 7,100
r Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 210,000 83,60D 126,400 94,000
SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 157.000 169 16%g31 860
Replacement of Interplant Fiber Doses 445,000 15.484 429,516 34,000
Windom 2000 Migration 333,000 16,783 315.217 38,00D
r Office 20DD Upgrade 69,000 - 80,000 69.000
SCADA System Replacement Study 310,001D - 310,0011 310,000
SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 458,0DD 438 457.562 63,000
Plant 2 Dewatering PLC SCADA Upgrade 281,000 - 281,000 281,000
r FIS Upgrade 1,281,000 183.581 1,097.419 219,000
Information Technology Disaster Recovery 91,000 4,245 86,755 5,000
Specialized Process Network 100,0D0 100 000 107 ODD
Subtotal-Plant Automation B Computerization 77,099,000 ---ir t<m 8wi-er 530
r' Process Related Spacial Projects
Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 20.000 19,809 391 19,620
Thermal Insulation Management Program 49,000 781 48,249 9W
Plant O 8 M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 1,608,000 - 1.600.000 8,670
�. Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 447,000 168,017 778,983 207,590
Managed Maintenance Program 348,000 - 348,000 46,000
Special Projects for FY 2000-01: Solids Processing 268,000 247,035 10,365 248,000
Spc PM 0001: Odor ConeolfRegulatory Compliance 651,000 69,325 681.675 70,000
r Special Projects for FY 2000-2001: Liquid Streams 216.000 15011 199981999899 71,000
Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 3.596,000 SWU 82 670,600
Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects
Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 1,042,000 703.105 .338.895 1,130,280
r Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 1,042,000 814,012 227,988 1,600,070
Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 1,042,000 561.127 480,873 1,658,680
Area Classification Studies 1.278,000 1,413.941 (135,941) 2,047,000
Strategic Plan-Phase 2 96,000 61,327 34.673 63,600
r Strategic Plan Program EIR 33.000 27,093 6,907 33,470
Modifications to Extsitng Mach.Systems 476,000 4,492 471,508 4,600
HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No. 1 and 2 737,000 5.635 731,365 103,630
Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 128,000 28.991 98,009 55.000
r Security System Improvements 383.ODO 79.167 303,633 231,620
Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project sol 169.795 330.205 310,600
Warehouse Reimention Project 240,000 - 240.000 19,000
Process Safety Management Compliance Program 30.000 - 30,000
Subtotal-Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects ITOW10-60 �3.88 ,885 3, 5 ,3 �7,L5�u
Water Management Projects
Gmundwaler Replenishment System 2,329,ODD 1,378.103 950,897 1,456,100
Water Conservation 419,000 514,958 (96,95B) 539.400
r Lang Ten Permanent Monitoring Program 3,358,000 34.591 3.323.409 250,450
Subtotal-Water Management Projects 6,105.000 1,927,652 4,177,348 Z,2A5,950
Construction In Progress Completed at 6130100 1,036,495 (1,036,495) 1,036,500
r Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 63,000,000 29,186.387 33,873,613 41,904,240
Capital Equipment Purchases 2,912,000 1,T72,499 1,139,501 2,912,000
Total Collections and Treatment d Disposal
Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases 0 83.529,000 $ 42,300,273 6 41,168.727 S 57,706,970
s/
Section 3-Page 5
2000-01 Third Quarter Report Let
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life y
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Current Total
Approved Jima 30,2000 Year projected Remaining Id
project Accumulated Projected Coat at Fu0ga
Budget cost cost June 3q 20DI Budget
Collection System Immomexem Ptolarts
Collecllone w
Sane Ana Tnmk Sewer Rehab. 8 7,494,000 $ 75,083 6 51,200 $ 12SM $ 7,367,737
Pwpsebon SCADA Conmmlcetlare Stldy 146,000 - - - 146.000
Continuous Feed chemical Treatment Facility 305000 - - - 308.000
Phase 2 Carmslon Assessment 68.000 - 68,000 1
Tnmk Sewer Mapping project 362,000 - - - 362AOD
Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sever 5,007,000 29,039 95.380 124.429 4,88Z571
Carbon Cnyn Savor and Pump Set Abandonment Z6851000 e5,185 51.000 116,185 2,588,815
Santa Ara River Interceptor Relief Seen, 11,853,000 38.806 248.800 287208 11,60,794
Ronabllfati n of Outlying Purp Stations 804,000 348,957 12,73D 361,697 442,3D3 Yd
Santa Ana Paler lnerceper Realignment and Prokc. 49,787,000 655,437 1,147,000 1,803,437 47,983,563
Taft Breech Inpraionemb 4,742,OOD 9,386 7,000 16.385 4,725.614
Ahwod SubWnk improvements 1,DD,000 62,821 90,400 153,021 1,735,979 iL
Eudld Relief lmprwemems-Reach W 10,831,00D 13.510 - 13,510 10,817,490
Replacement of Miler-HakerTmNk Senor Siphon IAKOOD K434 BOD,000 954.434 1,041.WB
OrneWWestern Subtunk Relief Sewer 1232,000 SZ585 64,750 117,315 1,114,685
RehadlUaeon of the Magrola Trunk Sewer 10,354,OOD 7,531.534 341,820 7,873,354 2,48D,646
Rehadlltatlan of Mgce Tnmk Sewer,Phase 12,127,O01) - - 12,127,000 (d
MlbNldder Tnmk SewerSyslem,Reach l 10,897,OO1) 7,72g75E 2,691,B00 10,416.555 280.444
Rehabilitation of tine Seal Beach Pump Seli 3,083,OOD - - - 3,0113,000
Rehadiltaeon of the WmWde Pump Station 1.619,000 148 49.430 4S678 1,689,422
More.To Mgndla Reiei Sewer in Western Ave. 209,001) - 1,600 1,601) 207,40D V
Big Canyon OBslte Sewer Rehadlle0on 2,714,000 4,399 16,580 20,919 ZM021
Replacement of Balk Bay Tnmk Sewer 8,095,000 25%236 1d5,140 430,376 7,664,624
Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 3p80,001) 9.940 93,430 103370 3,376,63D I
Reparenant of the Ratlty Pont Pump Station 4,124,001) 7.549 78200 85,749 4,038251 60
Rehnblie0on of me loth Sheet Pump station 2,211,OOD 5.286 88.550 93,838 2,117,164
ReaWlitation of dre-A•Stoat Pump Station Z248,000 4,205 649,400 653.605 1,594,395
RehadlleBm of cite Bay Stage Pump Station 1.094.000 - 54,800 54,800 1,039.=
Rehabililaeon of Se Crystal Owe Pump Station 306,000 369 41,130 41,499 254,501 W
Abandonment of AS Twk,Watson and Cal.Sawere 2,176,000 130218 33,000 163218 2,012,782
Gddameest Tnmk Sewer Replacement 4,6D7,OOD 2,472AM 944,050 3,416,613 1,09D,387
Heil Avenue lMercaphx 3,711,OO111 217,604 3,368.500 3.555.104 124.8%
Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 3,388,000 48,079 297,500 346,579 3,053,421 J
taeral and SewerAndndovrentat Padfic,Coast HW 129,000 - - - 129,000
RBhabi0e8on na of we Edinger Pun 1p99,00D 369 X82D 39,109 1,409,811
Capitallmproenants.ColletAaa 500,000 - - - 500,001) -
ReftwentofS.AnaleneRB - - 40.550 40,560 (40,550)
Eudld Twk Manhote Rehabilitation 1,954,700 1,51Q728 3,500 1,520,22E 444,472
Replace SARI Canto Gate 757,O0D 784,661 8,900 803,561 (46.561) _
Seal Beach Blvd.Relate. 48D,000 410,E 710 417,602 42,398
Miler-Hddaeproenems 6,344.000 6.027.MO Sezilso e,6211,651) (Z78.680) y
Relocation of tldoPump setlon 3,395200 3MA52 101,120 3,491 (97,372)
GaMmmast SL Sewer Redeemer! 491,700 368,476 2250 370.728 120.974
Nam Porgl Project-Earlier Pump Station - Boo 54,200 54,790 (54.790) _.
161'reeway Wdeong 67,100 122,755 280 123.016 (55,915)
Newport Bcule4rd and Pacific Coast hWy Widening 1,207,800 2284,576 1.340 229 418,216 (1,078, 6) )+'
Hwtinglnn Beach Sewer AND dormant 538,70D 198.901) 1800 20D,700 3M.OtO
Subtotal-Coledere 1 13 3{p 145252.6r2
Revenue Am
Rehabilitation of Cutiyig Pump Stations-Am7 395,000 70O.Wif 6,270 714,778 (318,778) W
Rarynet tall Pump Station Abandonment 128,000 Man 3.120 68,809 67,191 _
Smikomer Interceptor Mardoe Rehab. 5,387,000 114,024 50,800 164,824 5222,176
1�arl
W
Section 3-Page 6 f
W
CIP Review
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001
Currant Tate)
r Approved June30,2000 Yea Projected Rerrelning
ProJect FcswnWated Projected Cost at Future
Budget cost Cost Jurno,W 2001 11
TusOn Alrbase-AnreVog Subbunk Senor fnT,W ----977-9 -TMT j6.599 1,633 1
Givler-Redill Truk Relocation 5,704.000 - - 5,704,000
McCaw SuElnmk Sewer B Reno,Sletlon Abendmment 1,273,000 - - - 1,273,000
GleferReOhlll Trunk lnpraveaiernts,Reach 4.025,OOD 29.864 130,000 159,W4 3.666,138
CleorAtid11l System lrtprovertents,Reads-B' 5.013.00D - 12,000 12,000 5,001,ODO
r Tuetin Trunk Improvements 3,656,000 - 12,000 12,000 3,644,OOD
Orange Trunk lrrpmvemonls 3,94ZOOO 29,675 90.000 119,676 3.82Z325
Weal Trunk lnpmrenents 495,000 3.000 SODO 493.00D
Glsbr-RedhillMUN Trunk Inproiemanb 5,704,000 39,418 180,000 159,418 5,501=
Rgeeoenued of the College Ave.Prop Station 4,717,000 - 4,717,000
r Rehabldadon of the MacArthur Pump Station 1,354,000 - - 1,351,000
Wn,8aker Farce Main Vmgatien 30,O110 30,OOD
Inprmononb to Mdn SL P.S. 1,086.6se 1.Z23,132 14.760 1.287.892 (1S1$12)
College Ave PSParallel Force 1,W7,OOO 81,483 2.000 83,483 1,793,517
r Subtler System Upgra<IeM 3 Punt)StaOms 3100 3,100 100
Subiabl-Revenue Am 7 M.W.2K
Revenue Area 14
Tueen N,baso-Amabvng Subinmk Server 4,e21,000 234= 3,910 238,112 4,382,888
r Inprm�ema�b to Mean St P.S. Z�794,320 31 197 37940 3,183137
Subtefl-Rerenu,Nee 14 9 Total Collection System lmprwsmeM Projects 248,597,2W 40.742AW 12W0.730 Si 192,983981
Treatmem S Disoosal Projects
r Collectors Faclliees
SUWwd Truk Serer Rehabilitation 30,63D.000 12Z482 438,00D SWAW 30,069,518
Coop Projects,Imordnlilt Reduction 144,750,000 244,482 Z013,2W 2,257,602 14Z49Z318
Tlaaalere,011w Proierts: (140.254) - - (140,264)
r Ndsanaa RovDiversion Fac at Newxd Cures 40,000 20,397 19,500 39.9917 3
SSESfa Three Collection Areas 100,254 2,378 77,600 79,976 20,308
OtvMC-Wda Geograp!Jrallnfoi Pion System(GIS) 2.500.000 - - - Z500,000
SSOTrani g Fedlity 64,000 - 10,000 10.Om 54,000
r Rehab B Upgrade of Elio Ave.Rnp Station 1799,600 1725 1.728 1,797.772
Subtotal-Collec6om Fanilrdes {
roadworks
Grit Auger Repboevenl 1.088,000 106,604 931,430 1,040.034 47.966
Sunnoner Drive Replacement 407,OD0 71,953 154.290 226,243 180,757
Headwla RehahilltatlaJReomshment 4.330,000 416 31.500 31,916 4,298,084
Haaalmdslnpowmrenb at Plant W.2 74.118,0110 319,944 sm'sm 880,464 73,237,536
Headrorlo Pimp lnpwerrent&Overhaul 300,000 200,189 24.000 224,189 75,811
r Rehab of scam Savage Rana Motoe 2W OW 71,219 T700OZ7000 98219 110.781
Subtotal-roadworks 1'rzo 7w 240 ,W6 ".950,935
Primary Treahrent
Fadlitles kMdificatims for Ode Central 276,000 13.191 2ZZ400 235,591 40.409
Pd.awifiers 16318 Related Facilities 75,450,000 3,416,305 943,800 4,358,905 71.091,095
Waste Sldesbeam Rare Station Upgrade 1,0se,000 - - - 1,OW,OOD
Grader Center Drava ReplarertenUlJpgmde 5,840,000 - 10,000 10,000 S8WDDD
Sludge Oendry War Upgrades 8D%ODO - 4,000 4,000 79%ODD
Sludge level Masurenem Gee. rudeiation 354,000 500D 5000 359,OOD
Subtotal-Money Treaunanl
Secondary Troahmrd
Sec Treat Monitoring 6 CrM Sys,Upgrade 4,317.000 468,597 44,600 511,197 3,805,BW
Rehab Tredig Rhos B Construct New CaMlers 21,001,000 18,746 158.400 177,146 20,823,854
r ACEveed Sludge Ram Rehateilita0en 3.745.000 - - - 3,745.000
Oxygen Plant PeplacernereVRehat litaffm 110.000 - 20,000 20,Om 90.000
Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Sabctor Shay 51 OOD 95.000 0.000 416,000
SubloNl-Second re arYTreaOnt 0 �3 gW ---U'!3, 4- 9.657
r
Section 3-Page 7
u
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life LI
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Curtant Total
Approved June30,2000 year Projected Rerralning rr
Pmjed Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Budget Cost cost Jwe30.2001 Budget
Solids Handling&Digestion
Don,eterim Belt Press Feebuld SM000 279,736 105.900 365.636 14Z364 ri
Devalebg Belt Press Edasion 230.000 - 7.100 7,10D 222,900
Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plan No.2 17,234,000 6,42Z299 3,9D4,570 10.326,869 6,907,131 _
Soils Storage and TAW,Lose"FadlBy, 15,120,000 1.3l)4,216 3,894,740 5,079.016 10,040.984
Digestion&Dewalerirg Rehat JFahoibishmen 7,500.000 - - - 7,8go,000 lv
Deaztedng Belt Press Retsold 825,00D 255.5M 61,000 31S522 SM478
High Rate Digester MS Pumps Mete.Seals 517,00D 256,988 71p00 327,985 189,D12
Belt Press Automation 17SOOD Sagois 141,090 174,999 1
Sludge GrinderReplamnad 224.00D 16,776 161,ODO 177,776 16,224
Tule Ranch AcyuisfliorV&molds Management Site 9.4150.000 - 3,700,000 3.700.000 6150,000
Subtotal-solids Handling&Digestion B,fi59,506 N,646AW 2ap95�6 32W7,O94
Oman Outfall Systems
Cutts]Flow MHe Replacemere 1,124,OD0 107,437 315,020 42Z457 701,543 W
Peak Flow Management 4.055.000 63.763 208,160 271,9W 3,783.097
Wi t Pm gong Screw Amex 28.346.000 87,793 478,OD0 W5,793 27,780207
Investigation anti Repair of ocean Cutfall 1.274.600 1.104.694 61.500 1,168,194 108,405
Subtotal-Oman outset Systems 14� 1.364,677 1,05267B 2p26347 3Z373256
ulifity,Systems
Elect iml Poxer System Studies 3218.000 1.677,997 395AOO 2,07Z997 1,143,003
Starfy Power arm Reliability Modifications 17,370,000 5=362 1,119200 6,949,562 10.420.438
Cade Tray lmportvmnts at Plants 1&2 25.878,000 879.344 174,000 1,053,944 26,824,058
Imp.To Cero G.Starting Air System 141,000 18.333 119.930 130263 Z737
Slam Drain Database DaMoprnom and Tagging 10D.000 - - 100,000
C,mer _
Central a8mlwimiabon Z964.ODO - 25.800 2%SDO Z9382DO
Chemical Facility Mods.Al Ran No.1 3.768,ODO 2,966524 993,100 3.961.624 (193,624) 6d
Rant Utilities RehalliliteSpNRafuMshmont 3.360,000 - 3,ODD 3,OD0 3,357,000
&bdfica0as to eeo.&Conbd Systems Z615,000 2,036.632 324,400 Z351.032 253,968
High Primate Compressed Air System 409,000 356,193 51,790 407,983 1,017 1
Gas Compressor Addllm at Plant No.2 907,000 21,10) 3Z480 53,580 853,42D
Utilities Fehadlitaim and Refipdshment 3,394,0DO 49,302 215.100 264.402 3,128.595
UMergmund Storage Tank Leak Collection Upgrade 120.000 - - - 17AODO
Feet and West RAB Elevator Upgrade 1D8,000 - 105,000 105,000
Decbkal Facility Modificabore&Safety Upgrade.; 44Z9DO 248,465 42DO 25ZG65 190235
Subtotaal-why Systarc 655.790.900 14AS6,252 6564,600 17.650.551 48.146048 iul
Otlar Control Related Projects
Facilities Nrxtifimgare for Odor l:omd 384.00D 16.739 31Z30D 328.039 65.961
Facilities Moddmtiore for odor Corral 2,686,000 14.394 22A,400 238.794 2447.206 1 l
Gampehensino Oda Control Assessment 3.466,000 18Z898 774.420 967.318 Z508,682 LI
Aatureicn of Fad Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 - - - 73,000
Saubber Chem.Feed System Nark. 796,000 154,102 170200 324.302 471.696
subtotal-odor Control Related Projects 7AAODO 367,133 1A81.320 1,846,464 5556,5117
iw
Plant Automation&Computerization
Canputmvetl Facility Fars.&Dw9.System 4.956Om 2.994.448 1,733,550 4,727,998 228,002
Ptmer Monitoring and Control Systems 3.365.000 18,046 17,000 35,046 3.319.954
Ran Relmn=ntiaNAutomation Pged 25,760,00D S,WS,645 Z731,650 8,320295 17,439,705
CLAMS Pmgrdmmkg 490,000 274,082 116,920 391,002 98.998
Donmml Managenenl 884.000 476,620 100.350 577.000 287.000
Date integration 4,334,00D 2,039,487 196.510 Z235,997 2,096,003
Strategic Information Architeibae(SIA) 724.000 27ZSU 29,420 3OZO02 421.998
htramt Applmodon Owdocomant 3DDODD 78.834 6.170 85,004 214.995
Intent E-mail greasing(Webste) 300,OD0 169.939 18,060 187,999 112,001
Nehwk Backbone Upgrade ConSnastlon 1A97,ODO 1.004,108 239,OD0 1243,105 253,894 ...
IW
W
Section 3—Page 8
L
r
CIP Review
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Mine Months Ended March 31,2001
Cunent TOW
r Approved Juna30,2000 Year FMJeded Remaining
Prolec: Accumulated ProJected Curl at Futum
Budget Cost teat Jun 3D,2001 Budget
Vctcam Buldig ReMdng 67%= 616,997 30.000 650,997 28,1I03
Rernds Manpemenl Program 255.000 64,445 152,560 217,005 37,995
Saaee Centel Pm®awdrg S7r.000 3 1,433 116.570 451,003 125.997
Geogrdpirc lnformaeon Synen, 4,157.DD0 154,346 143,000 297,346 3.859.6%
Automation Report Pudisti g 195,00D 0217 105,780 194,997 3
r Field Flier Optic Lipgadce 6W.00D 2M.M 7,100 251,672 398,328
Field Fiber Optic Tarinal Standardicatlon 325,00D 273,216 84,000 357216 (32.216)
SCADA Oanmmiaeas-EOcnet Stutly 157.000 141 am 1,001 155,999
Replacement of interplant Fiber Oplie, 499,OOD - 34,000 34,000 465,000
Windays 200D htgakin 333,00111 - 38.0110 MOOD 295,000
Office 21D00 Upgmde 691000 - 69.000 69,OOD
SCADA System Rplacannt Study 310,000 - 310,000 310,001) -
SCADA GpNa Tagging Updsle 670.000 - 63,000 63AW 607,000
Plaid 2 Dwaleing PLC SCADA UPgrdde 291,000 - 281,000 281,000 -
�' FIS Upgrade 1.851,000 219,000 219,001) 1.632.000
INameden Teciuglegy,Disaster Recwery 140,000 - 5,000 5,OOD 135,000
Specialized Prooass NeMadr 107,ODD - 107.0110 107,00111 -
Subbtal-Plant Automation B Camputertedlon S3A46.000 10.700.158 8 630 32.182,316
r Prareaa Related Special Projects
Standard Specifatas Redsicns and Updains 200,000 433A53 19.620 453,073 (253.073)
ThamW Irsulallon Matsgament Program 800,01DO - am 830 799,200
Fart O B M Manual and SOP project-PtsseI 4,000.000 1.330 8,670 10,000 3.990.000
r HamNas EneW Corbel Pieced,ms 1.190,000 42414 2a7.59D 250.004 989,996
Managed Malntmane,Proper, a70.0DO 45.000 45.000 825,000
Spacial PmJeds for FY 200001: Solids Piceeniing 675.000 702257 MOOD 950257 (275,261)
Spc Prot OD01: Oda CMtrWRegWalay Compliance 651,000 1298.110 70.000 1,368,110 (717,110)
Special Pmlects b FY 200D-20D1: Ugtdd Steams 215,000 - 71,000 71000 WODO
SuMolal.Process Related Special Prolects 8.801,000 2,477,554 670,SB0 31N 5,152,758
Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects
Facribee Erpreiaig Projects-Joint 20,000,000 889,725 1.130280 2,000.005 17,999.995
,r Facilges Engineering Projetle-Fanl2 20.00D,ODO 399,933 1,600.070 2.000.003 17,999.997
Faci011es Englrlesig Frcieda-Merit 20,000,000 341,320 1,658,680 2.000.000 13,00(1.000
Are Culeffici Studes 27,919,000 748.814 2,047,000 2,795.814 25,123,186
Stree9lc Plan-Place 2 2.194.000 2.008.044 63.6w 2.071.644 122.356
r, Strategic Plan Regain EIR 1,119,000 817287 33,470 850.727 M,273
Modricalm to F)dslug Melt.SysWn 2,894,000 253,822 4,5W 258.322 2,435,678
HVAC Epdpmd Replacemant at Rants No.t arid 2 757.000 - 103.630 103,630 653,370
Landscape and lmgation at Fart W.2 810,ODD - 55,000 55,OW 755,ODO
r SeadN System Improvements 1,334.000 482,384 231,620 714.004 619,996
Seal Cap.Ec9p.Replacetn eel Prated 740,000 189.408 310.600 600.008 239,992
Wareheuie Reinvention Project 6DO.000 - 19,000 19.000 551,000
Rocese Safely Managanent Compliance Progam 30.000 30,000
SuMotal-Miarallaneen B Support PmJects 98,197,000 5,110,707 725 Aw 13,388,157 64JI28R41
Water Management Projects
Grwndmur Rplemshment System 178222,000 2,584,346 1,456.100 4,040.446 174,181,5&1
Wales Ccnserabcn 4,644." 9M,462 539,400 1.492.862 3.151,139
Lang Term Permanent Monliodrg Pnlgmm 5.000,000 250,450 250.450 4,749,550
r Subtotal-Water Marege lent Prole to 187,866,00D 3,W7,SW 22d5,950 5,783,758 182, SZM
construction In Piogmss Complaxid at 6130100 MIGM49 1,036.5DO 55.106,967 (55,10r4967)
TOW Treatment and Disposal Projects 8BZ6BS,ODD 11OA51,899 41,904,2d0 152,359,139 730,325M
r, capital Equlpwnt Purchases 2,912,ODD 2,912.000 2,912,000
TOW Cdtectlens aa1 Treaarent 8 Disposal
Projects and Capital EqulPrrent Pwdra5es $1,132,194,2110 6151,197,388 $ 57,706,970 2208,900.358 9 923 M842
r
r
Section 3-Page 9
u
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
L
i !
V
IJ
r
V
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
60
L
Li
V
) i
V
i
V
v
i
LI
1
r
SOCUM 9—Pape 10 L
u'
Budget Review by Revenue Area
All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
,r Operating Budget Review
2000-01 Yeaf'To• Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 34,504,000 $ 23,961,732 $ 10,542,268 69.45%
Connection Fees 4,823,000 4,593,910 229.090 95.25%
r Other Fees 74,258,000 41,799,026 32.458,974 56.29%
Sale of Capacity Rights 6,340,100 6,340,100 0.00%
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 31.410,000 34,013,334 (2,603,334) 108.29%
.. Total Revenues $ 151,335,100 $104,388,002 $ 46,967,098 68.96%
OUTLAYS:
r. Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 65,972,000 $ 30,958.886 $ 35,013,114 46.93%
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 17,554,000 11,401,387 6,152,613 64.95%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 40,737,000 26,161.000 14,576,000 64.22%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 46,000,000 35.011,168 10,988,842 76.11%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,546,000 7,570.262 1,974,738 79.31%
Total Outlays $ 179,808,000 $111,102.693 $ 68.705.307 61.79%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
r
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131/01
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction In Progress $ 25.521,061 $ 11,401,387 $ - $ 36,922,448
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 89.018,262 30.968,888 119,977,148
r Sub-Total 114,539.323 42,360,273 156.899.596
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 10,398,596 - - 10,398,596
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 357,1D4,332 - - 357,104,332
Treatment Facilities 600,045.285 - - 600,045,285
Disposal Facilities 00,108,851 - - 90,108,851
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 111,354,203 111,354,203
Sub-Total 1,169,011,267 1,169,011,267
r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,283,550,590 $ 42,360,273 $ - $1,325,910,863
Section 4-Page 1
V
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review u
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Operating Budget Review tr
2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-0ate
Budget Date Budget %of Budget v
REVENUES:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ 31.046,000 $21.692,684 $ 9,353.316 69.87%
Connection Fees 4.459,000 3,868,844 690,156 86.76%
Other Fees 66,641,000 37,664,687 27,876,313 57.47%
Sale of Capacity Rights 2,856.200 2,856,200 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 28,312,000 30,888,651 (2,576,651) 109.10% 1
Total Revenues $ 132,214.200 $94,114,866 $ 38,099,334 71.18%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 56,987,000 $26.729,902 $ 30,267,098 46.91% ,y
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 15,843,000 11.063,730 4,779,270 69.83%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 37,735,000 24,291,373 13,443,627 64.37%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 40,742200 30,561,239 10,180,961 75.01%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 7,876,000 6,197,665 1,678,335 78.69%
Total Outlays $ 159,183,2D0 $98,843,909 $ 60,339291 62.09% �
Capital Facilities Budast Review
W
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activiy Construction in Progress $ 23,952,851 $11,063,730 $ - $ 35,016,581
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 78,487,024 26,729,902 105216.926
Sub-Totaf 102,439,875 37.793,632 140233,507 W
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): -
Land and Property Rights 7,535.709 - - 7535,709
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 281,103,225 - - 281:103,225 W
Treatment Facilities 518,081,821 - - 518,081.821
Disposal Facilities 77,803,069 - - 77,803,069
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 96,584,044 96,584,044 W
Sub-Total 981,107,868 981,107,868
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,OB3,547,743 $37,793,632 $ $1,121,341,375 y
V
L
I
W
Section 4-Page 2
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
r Operating Budget Review
2000-01 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Data
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax Alloca0ons/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,458,000 $ 2,269,048 $ 1,188,952 65.62%
Connection Fees 364,000 716,379 (352,379) 198.81%
Other Fees 8,717,000 4,126,319 4,590.681 47.34%
Sale of Capacity Rights 320,900 - 320.900 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2,156,000 2,786,626 (630,626) 129.25%
.. Total Revenues $ 15,015,900 $ 9,898,372 $ 5,117.528 65.92%
.r OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 6,960,000 $ 3.263,067 $ 3.696,933 46.88%
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 1,123,000 295,810 827,190 26.34%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2,840,000 1,813,351 1,026.649 63.85%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,038,800 3.434,595 604,205 85.04%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 1,451,000 1.165,169 295,831 79.61%
�• Total Outlays $ 16,412,800 $ 9.961,992 $ 6,450.808 60.70%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01/00 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,566.448 $ 295.810 $ - $ 1,862,258
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 8,314,562 3,263,067 11,577,629
Sub-Total 9,881.010 3,558,877 13.439,887
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 2,364.394 - - 2.354.394
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46,622,800 - - 46,622,800
Treatment Facilities 63,242,673 - - 63,242,673
Disposal Facilities 9,497.554 - - 9,497,554
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 11,416,179 11,416,179
Sub-Total 133.133,600 133,133,600
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $143,014,610 $ 3,558,877 $ $146.573.487
r
Section 4-Page 3
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Operating Budget Review y
2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: (r
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - $ - $ N/A
Connection Fees 8,687 (8,687) N/A
Other Fees - 8.020 (8,020) N/A tat
Sale of Capacity Rights 3,163,000 - 3,163,000 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 942,000 338.057 603,943 35.89% 1 I
Total Revenues $ 4,105,000 $ 354,764 $ 3,750,236 8.64%
OUTLAYS: V
Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 2,025,000 $ 965.917 $ 1.059,083 47.70%
Collection Activity Capital Improvements 588.000 41,847 546,153 7.12%
COP Retirement and Interest Expense 162,000 56,276 105,724 34.74% I
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.219.000 1,015.324 203,676 8329% W
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 218,000 217,428 572 99.74%
Total Outlays $ 4,212,000 $ 2.296,792 $ 1.915,208 54.63% L
Capital Facilities Budget Review L
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31101 L
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,762 $ 41,847 $ - $ 43,609
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,216.676 965,917 - 3,182,593
Sub-Total 2,218,438 1.007.764 - 3,226,202
PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost):
Land and Property Rights 508,493 - - 508,493 L
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,378,307 - - 29,378,307
Treatment Facilities 18,720,791 - - 18720791
Disposal Facilities 2,808.228 - 2:808:228 L
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3,353,980 3,353,980
Sub-Total 54,769,799 - - 54,769,799 L
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 56.988,237 $ 1.007,764 $ - $ 57,996,001
L
L
I
Section 4-Page 4 L
r
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
r
Percent
Actual or Rudget Remalning AeWal
2000-01 Through Through moo-ol Through Increase
r Budget 0313112001 0313112001 Budget 03/3112000 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves $1,531,700 $1.809,121 WA WA $1,592.701 $ 216.420
Revenues
2. In-Lieu Premiums 1.246.500 934,875 75% 311,625 1,125,0D0 (190,125)
3. Interest B Miscellaneous 50,000 72.157 144.31% (22.157) 40,438 31,719
4. Allocationfrom Omer Funds 700,000 68.669 9.81% 631,331 437,629 (368.96M
r S. Total Revenues 1,996.500 1,075.701 53.88% 920.799 1,603,067 (527,366)
r Expenses
6. BenefiWClaims 300,000 17,553 5.85% 282,447 304,232 (286,679)
7. Contractual Services 3.500 900 25.71% 2,600 981 (81)
8. Legal Services 500.000 234.126 46.83% 266,874 395,712 (161,686)
r 9. Professional Services 3,000 5,086 169.53% (2,086) 2,130 2,956
10. Supplies S Other 500 - 0.00% Boo 177,614 (177,614)
11. Service Department Allocation 1,000.000 1,233,567 123.36% (233.567) 529.660 704,007
12. Subtotal Expenses 1,807,000 1,491232 82.53% 315,768 1,410,229 81.003
13. Excess Loss Policy 112,000 75,575 67.48% 36.425 83,619 (8.044)
14. Total Expenses 1,919,000 1,566,807 81.65% 352,193 1.493,848 72,959
15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 77,500 (491,106) -633.69% 568,606 109,219 (600.325)
16. Ending Reserves $1,609.200 $1.318.015 81.90% N/A $1.701,920 $(383.905)
r
r
Section 5-Page 1
2000-01 Third Quarter Report
Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review W
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
2000-01 Through Through 2000-01 Through Increase
Budget 03/3112001 03/3112001 Budget 03131/2000 (Oeereasel
1. Beginning Reserves $336.600 $302,064 N/A N/A $812,383 $(510,319)
V
Revenues
2. In-Lieu Premiums 1310,000 232,500 75.00% 77,500 232,496 4 1
3. Interest B Miscellaneous 25,000 35,540 142.16% 10540 14,957 20,583 W
4. Total Revenues 335,000 268,040 80.01% 66,960 247,463 20,587
W
Expenses
V
5. Bene6ts/Clalms 250,000 297,542 119.02% (47.542) 240,062 57,480
6. Contractual Services 25,000 18,750 75.00% 6,250 18,750 -
6w
7. Legal Services 30,000 16,244 54.15% 13,756 22,218 (5,974)
8. Professional Services 35,000 8,663 24.44% 26,447 32,506 (23,953) L
9. Supplies B Other - - WA - 34,677 (34,677)
10. Service Department Allocations 50,000 60,282 120.56% (10,282) 183,600 (123,318) L
11. Subtotal Expenses 390,000 401,371 102.92% (11,371) 531,813 (130,442)
12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 25,927 115.23% (3,427) 16,023 9,904 L
13. Total Expenses 412,500 427,298 103.59% (14,798) 547.836 120.538
V
14, Excess Revenue(Expenses) (77.500) (159,258) 205.49% 81,758 30( 0,383) 141.125
15. Ending Reserves 259100 142806 55.12% N/A 572000 $(369.194) L
L
W
W
L
Section 5-Page 2 i
LW
Orange County Sanitation District
(714 ) 962-2411
www • ocsd • com
mailing address :
P • O . Box 8127
Fountain Valley , California
92728-8127
street address :
10844Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley , California
92708-7018
OCSD 03/31/01