The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-03-28 Pt. 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 21, 2001 ° : NOTICE OF MEETING O,4)962-2412A1 1 Teen°eae°`z BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fo"at9la 27 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-819-9 avast address: 10084C 51is AvenueCA WEDNESDAY, March 28, 2001 92708-7018 Immediately following the 6:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District and Member Orange County Water District Meeting Agencies • cities DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Ananelm 10844 Ellis Avenue Brea Buena Park Fountain Valley, California 92708 onion s Foum ullert erton on,F The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Fullerton, larders B'o. District will be held at the above location, time and date. Huntingmn Beach Irvine Le Habra La Palma Lon Alsmitoe /A Newport Beach Orange Placentia and Sec rc ry San.An Seal Beech Stanton Tustin Ville Park rorba Linda County or orange Tentatively - Scheduled Uocoming Meetings Sanitary ofstrints OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday,April 4,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Costa Mesa Midway city PDC COMMITTEE • Thursday,April 5,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts bride Ranch JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,April 9,2001 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday,April 11,2001 at 5:00 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. 'To Protect the Public Health end the Environment through Emellence o Wastewater S/stems" �m BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 June June 27, 2001 July *July 18, 2001 August August 22, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November November 28, 2001 December *December 19, 2001 January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 March March 27, 2002 `Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month P\mdonldat lhvp.dW\admin\BSWgenda@001 Mee0ng No0w\MN2.2.doc ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 03/28/01 TIME: 6:30 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .....................ANDERSON................... Z �L — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD.................... . 1G — (LARSON) ........................ BOYD............................ _� �L — (CRANDALL) ...................CARROZZO................. _L — (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... ✓ — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �� — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... — (GAROFALO) ...................GREEN......................... �L — (DUVALL).........................GULLIXSON................... y y — (DEBOLT).........................JEMPSA...................... ✓ �L — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... — (WARD)............................KROM........................ (BROADWATER).............. LEYES.......................... ✓ — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ ✓ _ (CHRISTY)........................MC GUIGAN................ .. 7 — (SIMONOFF) ....................MOORE........................�L — (COONTZ)........................MURPHY...................... ✓ L — (EPPERSON) ...................NEUGEBAUER.............. �L — (FRESCHI)........................PATTERSON................. �� ✓ _ (KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ ✓ — (ADAMS) .......................... RIDGEWAY................... ✓ ✓ _ (DOW)...............................SIGLER.......................... — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... R: a, — (MILLER)..........................SWAN........................... � — (BLAKE)............................WALKER....................... ✓ ✓ — STAFF: Anderson ✓ Ghirelli ✓ Kyle ✓ Lawson ✓ Ludwin ✓ Miles Ooten ✓ Tomko Streed ✓ OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 02/28/01 G.Wvp.dla%admin\BSIDIRECTOR\Direct=Roll Catl.doc CHAIR'S REPORT TO THE BOARD AT THE MARCH 28, 2001 MEETING 1 . WE ANTICIPATED THAT THE JOINT MEETING COULD RUN LONG AND ASKED STAFF TO REVIEW TONIGHT'S AGENDA TO SEE IF THERE WERE ANY AGENDA ITEMS THAT COULD BE DELAYED FOR A MONTH. UNFORTUNATELY, MOST OF THE ITEMS ARE UNDER SOME CONSTRAINT, AND I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU REMAIN THROUGH THE ENTIRE AGENDA. I WILL DO MY BEST TO SPEED THINGS ALONG. 2. THE SCHEDULE FOR THE BOARD'S WORKING COMMITTEES IS: OMTS COMMITTEE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4TH PDC COMMITTEE: THURSDAY, APRIL 5TH FAHR COMMITTEE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11T" THESE MEETINGS BEGIN AT 5 P.M. 3. i REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28TH, AT 4 P.M. 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 28, 2001 COMMITTEE MEETING WERE APPROVED AS DRAFTED. I ASK THAT THE BOARD SECRETARY RECEIVE AND FILE THEM. 2. THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DISCUSSED THE VARIOUS ACTIONS SCHEDULED TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE JOINT OCSD/OCWD BOARDS MEETING. 3. 1 PROVIDED A REPORT TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE MARCH 23RD CASA BOARD MEETING, WHICH I ATTENDED AS A DIRECTOR. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER REPORTED ON: A. THE SARI LINE RELOCATION PROJECT, WITH UPDATED COST ESTIMATES. THERE WILL BE AN IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION OF THIS PROJECT AT THE APRIL 5T" PDC COMMITTEE MEETING. z B. LISA LAWSON PROVIDED AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW COMMUNICATIONS PLAN AND LEGISLATIVE OUTREACH ACTIVITIES. C. GARY STREED DISCUSSED BUDGET PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02. THE BUDGET WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN MAY AND JUNE. D. BLAKE ANDERSON ASKED FOR DIRECTION ON CHARGING ANNEXATION FEES FOR THE HELLMAN RANCH DEVELOPMENT IN SEAL BEACH. 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. THE STEERING COMMITTEE REAFFIRMED THE CHARTER OF THE FAHR COMMITTEE REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR AT-WILL CONTRACTS FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES WERE DISCUSSED. THE GENERAL MANAGER WILL HAVE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE THESE CONTRACTS WITHIN SET PARAMETERS. 3 C. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENTED TO THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN APRIL WERE DISCUSSED. 6. THE AGREEMENT WITH CROW-WINTHROP WAS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION. GENERAL COUNSEL WILL UPDATE THE BOARD DURING THIS MEETING'S CLOSED SESSION. a STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on Q k- , 20�was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on � lGru-L(_ 2 , 20L�1. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 20Z A�,, Penny M. K , Secre Board of Directors ry Orange County Sanitation District WTADON\OATA11WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC 1" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 21, 2001 Phone: 17141962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors no.111 9 address: Bn 1a.912] r,a,re Subject: Board Letter 92 valley.cA]28-812] S.a addre..: 1oe4a ere Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Fountain valley.CA information on any of the items, please call me. 92TDB-]D1a Outreach to Yorba Linda regarding the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation Project Member Agencies Since the public information meeting on February 21 in Yorba Linda and the General 0 Manager's appearance at the March 6 Yorba Linda City Council meeting, we have Clef.. received significant input from neighbors and the city of Yorba Linda concerning Mahican impacts to the Yorba Linda community and costs of the project. Due the questions Brea about costs and impacts to the community, OCSD is reviewing the proposed Buena Pare "Alternative D", the other alternatives identified in the EIR, alternatives that were cypress Fountain vency considered but not in the EIR, and new ideas that have been raised by the Fnllartrn community. This review period will take at least 60 days. Garden Grc a Hunpngtcn Beach IrWne As you may recall,we mailed letters in December explaining the project to more than Le Palma Habra La 3,500 residents in the east Yorba Linda area. Letters were mailed to 69 residents L.Af acocs who have properties that include the public bike path and the city and county access ftw crt Beach road, asking for an easement. The easement is needed under their property, outside Orange Placenue of their back yard, on the path or road, where the proposed alignment will travel Santa Ana under ground. All proposed easements are in areas that now allow public access. Beal Beach Stamen Tustin The requests for easements are on hold. The review period has been communicated Vine Park Yarba Linde to residents in a letter mailed during the week of March 19. We plan to host one or more public meetings in the coming months. eaancv of gran'' A citizen's advisory committee is being formed. The CAC will consist of residents in Sanitary Districts the Brush Canyon and Villa Del Rio neighborhoods, in addition to business owners crate Ma.. along La Palma Avenue. The CAC's role is to help OCSD identity impacts to the Midway My community while we review the alternatives and to act as a liaison between OCSD Water Districts and the Yorba Linda community. Irvine Ranch First Dairy Connected to SARI Line On February 28, 2001, the first dairy pond was connected to the SARI line. Ponds are designed to hold washwater and other wastewater from the day-to-day operation of the dairy, allowing the water to naturally evaporate. They are also used to hold 'To Protect the Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in wastewater Systems' Members of the Board Page 2 March 21, 2001 rainwater. Unfortunately, during extreme rain events these ponds are overwhelmed and overflow into creeks and roadways that drain to the Santa Ana River. This connection will allow the dairy to drain the pond prior to a rain event and thus avoid an overflow. At this time, the construction of a second dairy connection is being completed and a third is being started. It is expected that a total of nine dairy connections will be completed for this pilot project. These connections aim at studying dairy waste characteristics and will be used for possible future sewering of dairies to local sewer facilities. This dairy sewer connection is the result of two years of hard work that began with considering this option back in February 1999. As part of developing the concept, the preliminary monitoring of two dairies was done in mid-April 1999. This was followed by a lengthy discussion that took 12 months among five different entities (the District, two local jurisdictions, one regional authority, and a representative of private interests)that worked diligently to resolve institutional and financial issues. After several draft agreements and countless meetings, the objective of this project finally bore fruit, initiating a new era for multi-agency assistance in environmental projects, one with a watershed management approach. Dry Weather Urban Runoff Agreements Since the adoption of the District's Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy(Resolution OCSD-00-22)on September 26, 2000, District staff has been working to develop and implement dry weather urban runoff agreements with the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRW D), the City of Newport Beach, the County of Orange, and the City of Huntington Beach. These agreements set specific terms and conditions for the collection, treatment, and disposal of dry weather urban runoff. The status of each of these agreements is provided below. Irvine Ranch Wafer District Agreement: District staff has been working closely with staff from the Irvine Company and IRW D to finalize an agreement to collect, treat, and dispose of dry weather urban runoff from proposed Irvine Company developments. These developments will be constructed within the nearby Los Trancos and Muddy Canyons watershed areas located near the Pacific Coast Highway. District staff has met with staff from the Irvine Company and IRWD several times and has finalized the agreement. Members of the Board Page 3 March 21, 2001 On February 26, 2001, Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the District's Board of Directors, and Mary Aileen Matheis, President of IRW D, signed one of the first dry weather urban runoff diversion agreements ever created in California. IRWD anticipates completing the construction of the dry weather urban runoff diversion system by the summer of 2001. City of Newport Beach Agreement., As a result of a sewage spill that occurred in the fall of 1998 in the City of Newport Beach, the District proposed to settle an administrative civil liability complaint issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board through a Supplemental Environmental Project intended to intercept dry weather urban runoff Flowing into the Newport Dunes area and divert the runoff to the District's sewer system. The dry weather urban runoff entering the swimming lagoon at Newport Dunes is believed to be responsible for the frequent public health advisories that have been posted in this area. The proposal has been for the District to fund the design of the dry weather urban runoff diversion project and provide funding for construction in the amount of $40.000. Pursuant to the administrative civil liability complaint, District staff presented to the City of Newport Beach a 90 percent design plan of the diversion system, and on February 27, 2001, District staff approved a payment request voucher to issue funds in the amount of$40,000 to the City of Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach is scheduled to complete the construction of the dry weather urban runoff diversion system by the first week of April 2001. In conjunction with the construction, District staff has been working closely with staff from the City of Newport Beach to finalize an agreement and anticipates a final agreement before the completion of the diversion project. County of Orange Agreement., District staff completed a first draft agreement for the County of Orange and sent a copy to County of Orange staff on February 28, 2001 for their review and comment. City of Huntington Beach Agreement A number of diversions were established during the summer of 1999. The paper work is now catching up. District staff completed a first draft agreement for the City of Huntington Beach. A draft agreement will be sent to City of Huntington Beach staff in the first week of April 2001 for their review and comment. Members of the Board Page 4 March 21, 2001 Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Responds to Draft Federal Sanitary Sewer Overflow/CMOM Rule Background: The District has been preparing for the publication of EPA's draft Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Capacity, Management, Operation and Maintenance (CMOM)rule. The District has reviewed pre-publication versions of the rule, and the staff has been meeting with local cities regarding sewer infrastructure and participating in the development of a model CMOM program. EPA published the draft rule in January 2001, but the new administration put the rule on hold prior to official publication in the Federal Register. AMSA staff and its member agencies have conducted a preliminary review of the draft rule, and have formally registered concerns about some of its provisions. Of particular concern are deviations from the Federal Advisory Committee consensus agreements. This committee, made up of a large number of interests including cities and sanitation agencies, had recommended that EPA provide flexibility in its enforcement provisions and that real world practicality be weighed equally with the ideal of a spill-free world. In support of these continuing concerns, AMSA, along with the National League of Cities, National Association of Counties,American Public Works Association, California's Tri-TAC, and the Water Environment Federation, have submitted a letter to new EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman (See letter attached.). The letter calls for EPA to rethink some portions of the draft rule, particularly the conflict between the CMOM program and POTW liability for unavoidable overflows and the establishment of a treatment standard for the sanitary sewer system. AMSA is also concerned that EPA may consider publishing portions of the rule while continuing to develop other portions. AMSA believes that it is important for the rule to go forward as an entire package and not in a piecemeal fashion. The District will continue to participate in the development of this important rule and will convey information directly to our member agencies as it develops. AMSA Supports Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Federal Funding During the first week of March, in separate meetings at the U.S. EPA, AMSA briefed the new Chief of Staff, Eileen McGinnis, and the Associate Administrator for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations, Ed Krenik, on the W INow report and other AMSA priorities. Both officials reiterated EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman's support for finding solutions to the funding crisis. In Congress, the new chairs and ranking members of the two House subcommittees with jurisdiction over wastewater and water infrastructure funding have agreed to be co-chairs of the House Water Infrastructure Caucus (WIC). Rep. John Duncan, Jr. (R-TN)is the new chair of the Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Water Resources Members of the Board Page 5 March 21, 2001 and the Environment, with Peter DeFazio (D-OR)serving as Ranking Member. Over in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Paul Gillmor(R-OH) is the new chair of the reorganized Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) is the Ranking Member. Membership in the WIC, which grew to over eighty members last year, is expected to grow significantly after the eight co-chairs send a 'Dear Colleague' letter to their fellow House members in the coming weeks. California Assembly Bill 285—Sewage System Overflows Assemblyman Wayne has introduced a bill, AB 285, intended to identify and reduce sewer spill associated with grease blockages. The bill directs the local Regional Water Quality Control Boards to identify"Hot Spots"for further action. "Hot Spots" are areas where three or more grease-related sewer spills occur in a calendar year. The Regional Boards must then identify the source(s)of the spills and take measures to prevent future overflow events. Finally, the bill requires the State Water Resources Control Board to post information about spills on the Internet for public access. The District staff is participating in the review of this bill through CASA at this time. In the future, staff may request Board action in response to this legislative proposal. The bill is attached. Contractor-Caused Damage to Sewer Lines Horizontal-type drilling methods now allow contractors to install electrical and communications cable and fiber optics without trenching. This minimizes installation costs to the system owner. However, there is a serious downside. There is an increased incidence of damage to sewer lines because of the frequent use of this method. The damage normally occurs to the home or business laterals that drain sewage to the local sewer line. Damage to the lateral line may go undiscovered for months or years, which causes sewage to leak into the soil. Severe damage may result in service interruptions and in spills, immediately or years later. This increasing frequency of damage drives up costs to the public agencies due to additional service call outs and investigative, repair and back charge efforts. Also, if the laterals are owned and operated by the property owner, then the costs of repair fall to them. For these reasons the Sanitation District is recommending public agencies better inspect underground work in their jurisdictions. Today there are permitting processes, inspection requirements or fee structures for managing this type of work. We understand that the State Public Utilities Commission oversees access to work in the public right-of-way, on behalf of the utility owners. But it is unclear how much oversight is occurring on private property. Members of the Board Page 6 March 21, 2001 We are bringing this matter to the attention of the O.C. Health Care Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board and will be working with the local sewering agencies. We ask that the Directors pass this information on to their Public Works Directors and Sewering Agency Managers. A"Regional Clearinghouse" has not been funded or established to track and follow this issue as yet, but we are working on ways to provide it. We all need the data to manage the problem. Biosolids Update: Riverside County Registers Concerns On March 20, 2001, after almost three hours of testimony, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors (Board) postponed its vote on two biosolids related agenda items: the approval of the Riverside County Health Services Agency's report on the "Health Effects Related to the use of Pesticides and Sewage Sludge"; and the proposed prohibition of land application of biosolids on County-owned land. The report affirms that the existing federal and state regulations provide adequate health and safety measures to protect the citizens of Riverside County. The report finds that "[t]he minimal risk of disease transmission or causation makes the adoption of any additional mitigation, up to and including a full ban, (is)a policy decision based on the quality of life issues as opposed to a Public Health necessity." The report also concludes that the quality of life issues"apply equally to the similar uses of manure." As a result of this conclusion, and after studying field reports, Riverside County staff has concluded that virtually all complaints attributed to biosolids were actually the result of manure use. The Board instructed staff to form a "Blue Ribbon Committee" to address all issues surrounding the land application of biosolids. The Committee will be limited to eight individuals, formed by the Board, from a pool of representatives of the Riverside County Farm Bureau, scientists from the University of California at Riverside, Riverside County regulators, concerned citizens and the biosolids industry. It is anticipated that the committee will provide a report to the Board within sixty days of its formation. Attached for your review are several biosolids-related newspaper articles that have been published in Riverside County during the past month. Outreach Opportunities for All Earth Day 2001 —April 21 Orange County's largest Earth Day celebration at the Newport Back Bay provides two low-cost opportunities to further OCSD public outreach effort. Members of the Board Page 7 March 21, 2001 "Living on Our Ocean Planet— The Ocean begins at Your Front Door"is the theme for this year's event held on Shellmaker Island in Newport on Saturday, April 21. OCSD staff will host a booth to educate the pubic on GWRS and watershed management issues. Back Bay Trunk Sewer Replacement project leaders will be on hand to answer questions regarding details of this local project. Event planners expect approximately 3,000 people to attend. Please see flyer attached for time and details. OCSD is also supporting Earth Resources Foundation's 2""annual "Bike the Back Bay to Adopt Your Watershed" event at the"Stream Sponsors" level. The donation of$1,500 includes booth space. Funds raised from this event will be used for environmental education programs, protection of native plants and animals, and innovative practices in watershed management. It is estimated that 1,000 people will participate. OCSD plans to have its own team of bicyclists who will obtain pledges and contribute additional funds to support neighborhood outreach programs. So start peddling -- if you would like to be part of our team contact Lisa Lawson at 714/593-7120. For more details see the enclosed brochure. Water: Barron's wades in with this thought: An Investment idea that can't miss The March 5 Barron's cover story is entitled, "Precious Liquid". It is attached. The article talks about water as the next promising commodity play. If this is true, then is this one more reason for GW RS? Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. Members of the Board Page 8 March 21, 2001 If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. I Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt G:1WP.GTAUGMI"MLLE RS TO THE OO IN32&b.O0O Attachments National League of Cities National Association of Counties Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies American Public Works Association TRI Tac Water Environment Federation N Dnnala 3. ExxvrDim March 5,2001 ive Dirtctar T6: (202)6263010 bmul(Ja nlc.mg The Honorable Christine Todd Whitman NAC. Administrator L."E.Nanke U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Eaaelive Di.w Ariel Rios Building 1101A Tel:(202)393a226 Ivaake®rummg 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,N.W. Washington,DC 20460 AMSA Re: Sanitary Sewer Overflow Signed Proposed Rule Ken Kirk EaecmiD rei:(zo2)z>a33-4653a6s3 Dear Administrator Whitman: kkih®aamaa<Iamvamrorg The National League of Cities(NLC),National Association of Counties(NACo), APWA Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies(AMSA),American Public Works Pew King Association(APWA),Tri-TAC(consisting of the California Municipal League, E.eeari"e Dveemr California Association of Sanitation Agencies,and California Water Environment Teh(Ac)408-9541 pking(a)np xv Association),and Water Environment Federation(WEF)request your input and leadership on an important Clean Water Act(Act)issue. N/rac Our organizations,which represent local elected officials and the professional Phil Enbd operators of publicly owned treatment works POTWs la an invaluable role chair P P Y ( ).play Tel:(00)329-n85 protecting public health and water quality and assisting EPA in developing and phil_bobelQcity.pab implementing man clean water regulatory Our contribution is exemplified phil—b.aa P g Y P by our continued involvement in the Agency's Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)negotiation process to develop national regulations for controlling sanitary WE sewer overflows(SSOs). As you begin the process of examining regulations generated ran wwaiann by the previous administration,we ask that you give careful consideration to revising a Dire ,Govemmem ABei. Tel:(903)684.2437 January 5,2001 signed proposed role(proposal)to regulate SSOs from municipal willims@"Eors wastewater collection systems under the Act. We support EPA's development of national regulations to reduce uncontrolled SSOs. The proposal has the potential to establish important performance standards for collection system capacity,management, operation and maintenance(the CMOM program)and provide needed consistency in addressing SSOs across states and regions. However,the signed proposal imposes an impossible premise that will ultimately place most American cities in immediate and permanent violation of the law. We urge you to review this proposal,prior to publication in the Federal Register,to evaluate alternatives that are equally as protective of water quality. 2 a ' March 5, 001 Page 2 We are also concerned about recent indications that EPA is considering publishing only certain portions of the proposal and withholding others for further review. This piecemeal approach would only widen the disconnect between various concepts in the proposal,and we strongly discourage this approach. The signed proposal is based on the premise that sanitary sewer collection systems can be built and operated to never overflow under any conditions. This premise is simply false. Even the most optimally operated and maintained systems can and do experience unavoidable overflows. During the SSO FACA process, EPA recognized that even significant investment in SSO controls and implementation of the most aggressive CMOM programs will not prevent overflows during excessive wet weather conditions or as a result of unavoidable blockages or pipe failures. The proposal includes only a passing reference to this acknowledged engineering reality. Instead, by utilizing the proposed"prohibition and excuse"approach,the rule perpetuates an unrealistic zero overflow standard that ultimately will expose even the best-designed and operated systems to costly enforcement actions with little environmental benefit. We believe EPA has the authority under the Act to establish a standard for sanitary sewer collection systems that utilizes rigorous CMOM implementation for defining unavoidable overflow events in well-tun systems. We request that you reevaluate the signed proposal to accommodate this more workable approach before publishing it in the Federal Register for public comment. We will contact your office soon to arrange a meeting with you and your staff to discuss this important issue and specific alternatives to address this important issue. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ��f aaLt Donald J. Borut Larry E. Naake Executive Director Executive Director National League of Cities National Association of Counties Ken Kirk Peter King Executive Director Executive Director Association ojMetropolitan Sewerage Agencies American Public Works Association Timothy S. Williams Phil Bobel� Director,Government Affairs Chair Water Environment Federation TRl Tac March 5,2001 Page 3 cc: Mitchell E.Daniels,Jr.,Director Office of Management and Budget Marcus Peacock, Associate Director,Natural Resources,Energy&Science Office of Management and Budget Diane Reps,Acting Assistant Administrator for Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mike Cook,Director EPA Office of Wastewater Management CNN.c...: $1.3 trillion needed to rebuild the nation's infrastructure - March 8, 200 Page 1 of$3 )'OhQo c4r1�Z SEARCH (CUMN .com./ U.S. �— CNNSI� Warn tyoy .eua:maxvn"o o: MAINPAGE .." knoa v WORLD i" Naeq . . WEATHER SPSPORTSSS Report: $1 .3 trillion needed to rebuild the US Hagi, POLITI[B LAWnation's infrastructure reduction BCI-TECH Study,Kids SPACE March 8,2001 emblem• HEALTH ENTERTAINMENT Web posted at:6:17 a.m.EST(1117 GMT) - '^ ; TRAVEL _ Disooveryli CAREER LOCAL In this story: Sub skipper IN-DEPTH Navy repod School enrollment outpaces construction ,rS' Jots.ners Newcatagpry:Energy generation, settlement tmlmammo"Insolo transmission '- tamme rmm101mmtmimW Report:$1.; .4 ommt vm,mm RELATED STORIES,SITES 'i' U.S.Hiash 1001010010 JAIQ A Click He, (MORE) EDITIONS: From CNN's Julie Vallese .com CNN.mm Asia House set 4 CNN.mm Ewa = reductions set default edition WASBINGTON(CNN)--Structurally f-.- deficient bridges,unsafe dams and :�'" Study;Kid, MULTIMEDIA: g Yuen overcrowded and outdated school buildings teasing as'I audio are same of the problem cited in a report DDAN UPow more services p eP pmleslers from an engineering group on the E-MAIL`Subscribe to one of our infrastructure of the United States,and it U.S.Milan news a-mail uata. says it will cost$1.3 trillion to fix them. Indian mast Enter your address: �:ga (MORE) The review,released Thursday the p..e American Society of Civil Engineers �+^P`- free addres (ASCE),says the money is needed over the U.S.lem st DISCUSSION: next five years to shore up the nation's Retails 1:119 gf booms crumbling infrastructure,which it graded as spat y�onts(oc feetlback a D+Overall. Scenes of New York CNN WEB SITES. MQRE) IIp1OIICafO CW t The 2001 report card sites explosive population growth,school enrollment MARKETS allpollike CM fr- outpacing education investment and maintenance,political red tape and an AL a 1 CNNfvLmm aging system for the almost failing grade. It also calls for a partnership NAS • 4 NN=m Eurt between citizens,local, state and federal government and the private sector to �S&P^+ 3 CNN.cam Asia remedy the problem.Spanish Pouese German In the three years since the society's last report,where an overall "D" was Uconn,WE Italian Swedish given, five categories have slightly improved,three have deteriorated and the tourney Namea'an addition of two new areas keeps the average grade low.The twelve areas are open:Tex DanishJapane aviation,bridges,dams,drinking water, energy transmission,hazardous meet with K Korean H Korean Headlines waste,roads, schools, solid waste,transit,wastewater and waterways. cowboys w: TIME INC.SITES: 12 seasons Go To.,, i> "The solutions to these problems involve more than money,but as with most (MORE) CNN NETWORKS: things in life,you get what you pay for. America has been seriously under- CN investing in its infrastructure for decades and this report card reflects that," a All Soon http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/03/08/crumbling.infrastructure/index.htmi 03/08/2001 CNN.c...: $1.3 trillion needed to rebuild the nation's infrastructure - March 8, 200 Page 2 of43 CMiNTERHATONAL said ASCE President Robert W. Bela WEATHER CwFk- nZfgllYS S Zip CIie RAD11® School enrollment outpaces construction ----- cw+AIRVORT WORLD �VaB!\! .. HETWORa shams ek( CNN anchors The solid waste category received the highest grade,a C+, and schools luDm transcriote received the lowest mark-a D-.Both received better grades than the 1998 ur -----— TnCLdistrino bun ALLROLIT: report, where a C-and F were given respectively.One reason for the hlousagatl SITE INFO: increased grade in solid waste is that state programs are successfully reduclim search converting waste to energy by recycling.The report says 17 percent of the LAW 11111s nation's solid waste is now converted to energy. l@tl-Jmduc Denali WEB SERVICES: ----- The nation's school system suffers SCI-TECH from enrollment that outpaces Record Iabe Neosler construction,the report says. - -- ' According the ASCE,three quarters ENTERTAX -- - of all school buildings fail to provide cenwys a positive learning environment HEALTH q because of overcrowding or outdated SDmo w • facilities.The report says$127 billion stem cell re is needed to correct the problems. TRAVEL 0 New billsal, Since 1995,transit ridershiphas more Decoy ABing bridges Since - - - ---- increased 15 percent in the United CAREER States. Existing public transportation systems have had difficulty keeping up Tecrile Irn°' with demand,despite increased funding and growth. The report cites San L(MORE H Francisco's BART system and Washington D.C.'s Metro system as two mass transit systems that were not able to anticipate growth or predict commuter patterns when constructing the rails. The report says air traffic has increased 37 percent over the past 10 years,but the nation suffers from gridlock in the skies due to lack of expansion in airport construction, air traffic control systems and infrastructure,which reported only a one percent increase in air travel capacity.Overall the nation received a C-for transit. Wastewater and drinking systems in the country are old and in need of great improvements,the report says. Some sewer systems are 100 years old. Although billions of dollars have been spent on wastewater systems,only current systems have seen improvements.There has been no money spent on expansion for a growing population,the report notes. Wastewater and drinking water systems both received a D. Dams also received a D, the same grade the category got in 1998.The report says there are more than 2,100 unsafe dams in the United States,with defects that can cause failure. Since 1999 there have been 61 reported dam failures and the number of dams that could cause loss of life increased from 9,281 to 9,921. New category: Energy generation, transmission Energy generation and transmission is a new category in the report.For its first showing, it received a D+because of the inability to meet the overall demand for power.The report says more than 10,000 megawatts of capacities http://www.cn n.com/2001/U S/03/08/crumbling.infrastructure/index.html 03/08/2001 CNN.c...: $1.3 trillion needed to rebuild the nation's Infrastructure - March 8, 200 Page 3 of!3 need to be added each year until 2008 to keep pace with the 1.8 percent growth in demand.In the last 10 years only 7,000 megawatts per year has been added. The nation's ports,harbor channels and inland,intracoastal and coastal waterways were evaluated for the first time in the category of navigable waterways,earning a D+.Waterways move 2.3 billion tons of commercial goods,but the investment for these systems has decreased 709 percent over the past 30 yews.The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers has$38 billion in approved projects to improve them that will take 25 yews to complete. An increase in federal and local funding helped to boost the grade for roads from a D-to a D+and bridges from a C-to a C.The report warns that Congress must continue to commit funds to roads and bridges to maintain and improve these systems.Almost a third of bridges rank as structurally deficient and roads are in poor or mediocre condition. "With a projected federal budget surplus of$5.6 trillion dollars,our leaders in Congress have the funds needed to restore our ailing infrastructure,"said Bein. Fighting 'downward trends' Effective regulation and enforcement of policy boosted hazardous waste from a D.to a D+.Contamination of new sites has remained low,but the report cites concern that contamination could grow because of a backlog in the system. "As dismal as these grades seem,many of the downward trends can be reversed with increased funding and a renewed partnership between citizens, local, state and federal governments,"ASCE Executive Director James E. Davis said. "As a nation,we have taken for granted that our lights will turn on,our roads and bridges won't crumble beneath us and that we'll have clean and safe water when were thirsty." The report card was put together by an advisory panel for the ASCE.The 1 I civil engineers on it represent various divisions of civil engineering. Each category was evaluated on the basis of condition and performance,capacity versus need and funding versus need. RELATED STORIES: For more US news, myQNN.com will bring You news from the areas and subjects you select. RELATED SITES: The American Society of Civil Engineers World Headquarters • Read ASCE Infrastructure Report Note:Pages will open In a new browser window Extemel alms am not endorsed by CNN Interactive. http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/03/08/crumbling.infrastructure/index.html 03/08/2001 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-2001-02 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 285 Introduced by Assembly Member Wayne February 16, 2001 An act to add Section 13228.5 to the Water Code,relating to water. LEGLSLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 285,as introduced,Wayne. Sewage system overflows. Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act,the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies that regulate water quality. This bill would require each regional board to identify all "hot spots,"which the bill would define to mean those areas in which 3 or more grease-related sewage system overflow events have occurred within a calendar year that result in the discharge or threatened discharge of waste to the waters of the state.The bill would require the regional board,upon identification of the hot spots and the sources of the hot spots, to notify the affected facilities, to take measures to eliminate the cause of potential future overflow events, and to report sewage overflow data to the state board,as prescribed.The bill would require the state board to make available to the public,by Internet and other cost-effective means, infomlation generated in accordance with these provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. I AB 285 —2— The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the 2 following: 3 (a) The protection of our state's water quality is a top priority, 4 in order to ensure the health of all the state's citizens,the protection 5 of species and valuable ecosystems, and the continued and 6 growing success of our state's coastal economy. 7 (b) Sewer system overflows,in which overflowing sewer pipes 8 frequently result in raw sewage reaching the waters of the state,are 9 a significant cause of diminished water quality,and have also lead 10 to beach closures due to high bacteria counts caused by those 11 overflows. 12 (c) A primary cause of sewer system overflows is the blockage 13 of sewer pipes by grease that has been released from food 14 processing and preparation facilities. 15 (d) Technologies that collect the grease before being deposited 16 into the sewer system are readily available,already in use in some 17 regions,and are relatively inexpensive to install and maintain. 18 (e) These technologies, where applied, have significantly 19 reduced the number of sewer system overflow events caused by 20 grease,thereby saving the local enforcement agency and the public 21 valuable tax dollars. 22 SEC.2. Section 13228.5 is added to the Water Code,to read: 23 13228.5. (a) Each regional board shall identify all "hot 24 spots" in its region. 25 (b) For the purposes of this section, "hot spots" means those 26 areas in which three or more grease-related sewage system 27 overflow events have occurred within a calendar year that result 28 in the discharge or threatened discharge of waste to the waters of 29 the state. 30 (c) Within the identified hot spots, the regional board shall 31 identify the causes of the overflows, including identification of 32 individual food processing or preparation facilities, or other 33 facilities, that are likely to be the source of one or more of the 34 overflows. 35 (d) Upon identification of the hot spots and the source of the hot 36 spots,the regional board shall notify the affected facilities and take 37 measures to eliminate the causes of potential future overflow 38 events. Measures to be used by the regional board shall include 99 -3— AB 285 1 adoption of best management practices and the provision of 2 educational information. 3 (e) The regional board shall reevaluate each hot spot on an 4 annual basis. 5 (f) Each regional board shall report sewer system overflow data 6 to the state board, including the number of overflow events, 7 sources,causes,remedies,and any improvements,or lack thereof, 8 as a result of measures taken to reduce overflow events at the 9 identified hot spots. 10 (g) The state board shall make available to the public, by 11 Internet and other cost-effective means, information that is 12 generated pursuant to this section. O 99 Inland Empire Online - Digital Extra Page 1 of 3 Doers otDistinction FRIVAn 709.Getl 170U/aUO.aatl.866/ PAIIifIY,�i I Aid I11111 I arch this site Locmon. Home>Digital Extra>ei�ogds>County Panel Wed.,Mar.21,2001 BIDSol Ids News Featured content Classifieds •Thg¢pjgljUblcvtle Sports County creates panel to form sludge policy •EPA's mosollds into Rage Entertainment •EPA blosollds Q&A Business Foes hoped a meeting would yield a ban on the fertilizer, •Tsnlr veers of Technologybut more supporters showed up. to Irls ie�s axperien� Compo tln adl_Il-ss Community Infug Living By Laurie Koch Thrower Marketplace The Pr ss-Enterprise Web links Weather RIVERDE •National Siosol'ds Partnership Web site Site Map Residents who want the county to stop farmers from fertilizing fields •Federal EPA Web site with sewage sludge turned out for the Riverside County Board of •Callfomla EPA We Archives Supervisors meeting Tuesday hoping for some action. ska About Us •US Deo't of Andculture •Svnaoro.rnm But the sludge opponents found themselves outnumbered at Tuesdays meeting by farmers,researchers,a sludge distributor,a loNEll -Ak1aIW s sewage treatment plant operator and various associates who showed ---... I up to defend sludge. Sludge producers and distributors--who are rapidly losing places in the state to deposit the material--and the farmers who depend on the free fertilizer protested tighter regulations. The board decided it would be wise to work toward a compromise and opted to create a panel of scientists,residents and farmers to forge a e countywide policy on the spreading of sludge on farmland. Only Supervisor Bob Buster,who wanted to ban sludge from county- owned land leased to farmers,wanted to vote on his plan immediately. The board directed county Executive Officer Larry Parrish to put together a list of candidates for a"blue ribbon"committee and report back in two weeks. 'This would basically be coming from the people and the experts as a recommendation,"Supervisor Jim Venable said. Buster's proposal for tougher restrictions will be bumped to the panel. In recent weeks,residents from rural areas between Hemet and Temecula have packed board meetings,calling for county officials to ban sludge from local agricultural fields, as several other counties have done. Farmers say that sludge,the byproduct of the sewage treatment process, provides great nutrients for crops,but neighbors say the stuff smells bad and makes them sick. http://www.inlandempireonline.com/sludge/pe-032101.shtml 03/21/2001 Inland Empire Online- Digital Extra Page 2 of 3 Winchester resident Margie Newman called the counts new committee"another put-of"and said that 0 she is Invited to some.she w81 say no. "I just felt like we were overpowered by the legal mumbo Jumbo," Newman said about Tuesday$meeting. Sludge proponents displayed photographs of orderly sludge-spreading operations and showed a video featuring testimonials from farmers. Researchers told the supervisors there is no proof that spreading sludge outdoors is harmful to people or the environment—and said there is some evidence that it is not harmful. Charles Gerba,a University of Arizona microbiologist,said the university maintains an experimental farm spread with sludge specifically to study the material's potential impact on public health and the environment. "We've found that it's a very good practice,"Gerba said. The bacteria and viruses in sludge the in 24 to 48 hours in the hot Tucson climate,which is similar to Riverside County's and atmosphere, he said.Results might be different in a damper climate,he said. The researchers have not found any evidence that the rules already set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency need to be strengthened Gerba said. After the supervisors'meeting,Gerba said the air surrounding the experimental farts has shown no evidence of being tainted with germs from the sludge.The researchers have not tested for fungus,which a previous report said might cause allergic reactions in sensitive people. Farmers said the free sludge is necessary during tough economic times. Bob Ghirelli,director of technical services for the Orange County Sanitation District,urged the board to stick with current sludge rules. Under questioning from Buster,Ghirelli said the sanitation agency is trying to find places in Orange County to spread sludge generated in that county,rather than sending it to other counties,including Riverside County. "I believe in handling our fair share,"Buster said,"but not all of Southern California's." Laurie Koch Thrower can he machedby e-mail at orby phone at(909)246-6130. Published 3/21/2001 Send comments to li http://www.in[andempIreonIine.com/sludge/pe-032101.shtml 0 3/2 112 0 01 Supervisors postpone sludge hearing-NCTimes.net Pagel of 2 •, Today's weather ` Check The ' r Forecnxt I'rcviuu+.Stuh 11 lleadlincs �� Ng i_S � Our Best Links What We Do Supervisors postpone sludge hearing AGNES DIGGS Keyword Search Staff Writer RIVERSIDE----A hearing to consider limiting the use of treated Search Advanced sewage on farmland in the county was postponed by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, but a group of anti-sludge activists let the supervisors know where they stand anyway. Because two experts could not be available to testify before the board Tuesday,supervisors voted to postpone for a week a public hearing on a proposal by Supervisor Bob Buster to ban the use of both fully treated and partly treated human waste,known respectively as Class A and Class B biosolids or sludge, on county-owned land. The proposal would also increase the buffer zone around areas where the sludge is applied from 500 feet to at least a quarter-mile ---- 1,320 feet---- from residences,schools and similar pubic places. Synagro, a national waste recycling company with a composting plant north of Lake Elsinore,has been regularly spreading the sludge-based fertilizer on about 4,000 acres of land in western Riverside County,mostly east of Interstate 215. Critics say the sludge poses health risks that are too high, but the county Health Service Agency says the health risks are negligible. Apart from the health concerns, opponents say the foul odors and flies associated with sludge make it a nuisance, a point county officials do not dispute. "We would never have moved here if we'd known about this," Menifee resident Carol Popoff told supervisors on Tuesday. "Are my 84-year-old mother and my children subcitizens?Please do the honorable thing and stop the spreading of sludge." Marc Miller, who lives in the Menifee Valley, said only a total ban on the use of sludge would resolve the problem. "The quarter-mile limit is pointless," Miller said. "Nobody is out there measuring anything. ... There's no enforcement. What's going to prevent the new guidelines from being violated?" Dr. Gary Feldman, county director of public health, said that current county regulations limiting sludge application to within 500 feet of a home apply only to Class B, or partly treated, "biosolids," as the treated sludge is known. There are no regulations covering the spreading of fully treated biosolids(Class A) or manure. Class A fertilizer and manure can be spread to the edge of a field,which may be next to a http://www.nctimes.com/news/2001/20010314/ppp.htm] 03/15/2001 Supervisors postpone sludge hearing-NCTimes.net Page 2 of 2 house. "They smell the same," Feldman said, referring to the two classes of sludge and manure. "So a lot of times people feel they are being exposed to Class B, but it may in fact be Class A." Damian Meines,the county's assistant environmental health administrator, said the county has six or seven people trained to do sludge inspections. Each field is inspected at least once before and after the fertilizer is applied. Given the level of public attention to the issue recently, most fields are being inspected two to three times,he said. "A quarter mile is fine for Class B and 300 feet for Class A and manure would be a good place for the discussion to start," Meines said. "In a heavy wind situation,you are still going to get odors at that distance but still retain a lot of the property for(receiving the sludge). I think this would go a long way to addressing people's concerns." What would address her concerns is for the sludge to go away altogether,said Athena Geges, who lives on Merjanian Road. "My kids are sick. Other kids we sick. Please help us to stop this," she asked supervisors. Other Menifee Valley residents have complained of rashes and nausea occurring shortly after sludge applications. A report issued by the Riverside County Health Services Agency in January concluded that sludge presents "a negligible risk of the transmission of communicable disease." However,the report also says that airborne transmission of the fungi Aspergillus,which is found in sludge, "has been linked to allergenic reactions in hypersensitive individuals." Those allergenic reactions can include mild itching,watering eyestnose, coughing and sneezing, wheezing or more severe respiratory distress such as with asthma. For 6 percent of asthmatics,exposure to Aspergillus can eventually lead to severe loss of lung function,the report states. Contact staff writer Jose Sanchez at(909)6764315, Ext. 2605,orjsanchez@netimes.com. 3/14/01 PreN lout Stoix 11 1leadline_s 11 Next Sign- eebmacler(u4u•lunec.enm r.19Yi '_Ofll North Counto 'l unes editor(¢nclimcs.cum http://www.nctimes.com/news/2001/20010314/ppp.html 03/15/2001 Inland Empire Online -News Page 1 of 2 Dodge Trucks yr AzervmnN Tna PressEMerp' e o peat for RIVNSIEe enE Sa 6emnElne oounties. Wednesday, March 14,2001 DIGITAL EXTRA Q TOdaYS headlines _. Environmentalist has say on sludge ER Is aeph^^^'^" ASierra Club representative tells supervisors Pnmmamnmara na.=a�.en that more fasting is needed. sWdpe Sl,yT]IFB?] By Leude Koch Thrower nm =n^nr SYdllld. TM Press Eneirpdee MI�NJMdf RMERSIBE m xec nm uDMBM?M Concern about the spreading of sewer sludge on rz!IfJJJW'1oi " Riverside County's farmland has an added voice: + MdJueJda _ environmentalists, N° "'°"^"^"e,n 1n1aotl sasarlel D'lI'� nrtn y n wheels w IrJL .:,ea0` A' _ Not enough testing has been done to determine mwa nn n ngransr. �ee r,.� Asnldl the effects of treated sewer sludge on imperiled eouesl Ids usr -- plants and animals,the Sierra Club's Terry Wold o'""'^••^""^era told the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on sawn; a mnm ann<sd Tuesday. 1aaWacsays Plannor% nnrm,f In. In recent weeks, residents have barraged county osceQue Omer plan vosels -- ---- -- — - - officials with complaints about the treated sewage ^�^°^•^^^_ sludge spread near their homes in the French v^' •"°""•`" ""-•" Valley, Winchester and Menifee areas. ^'R hmom=nnn mn parks eels —� Saaesis Word, coordinator of the Sierra Club's San prpm Gorgonio chapter, told supervisors that $zae den sefflernent d pane: environmentalists also have concerns. Heavyc 1i1orhsp%tgair ale eai n-ra,�e=reaL'1 metals in sewer sludge are suspected of killing r County r federally threatened desert tortoises in Kern coon v nanuat niaa mnesa County,where the sludge was eventually banned, she said. dew= M'm Loma oroup takes on "We have great cautions about it,"Wold said after r'F^rnm.^If,,en,n,,,^^ the meeting. ^^d"^1Ce rmcerys Risles not for d L Brent MCManigal, Synagro regional vice r^,^.�1ee=r.nr^�_�rnrs president, the company that transports sludge to hrw��anaeo^;�mo aI emesie local fields,said the U.S. Environmental Cla==r Protection Agency did assess sludge's potential to sp^^ b "n^ '^ '^''^land damage the environment.The EPA allows the cl nnnee.nn.,me^��,^nsi material to be spread only on fields farmed in the reds,,,,n,men,enwinn past five years, he said. M,,rder^r=h-1 in^^^n't" Whose Tee a asp he,..e m "We are not applying any blosolids in desert tortoise " tortoise areas," McManigal said in a phone interview. .c ns e,e uauev�m ^.e a•= Temnr ,ep.= http://www.inlandempirconline.com/news/stories/031401/sludge.shtml 3/14/01 hiland Empire Online -News Page 2 of 2 The board had been scheduled Tuesday to amn discuss Supervisor Bob Buster's proposal to ban '"""°.... . sludge from county-owned land and to require a over ell lanRnh Pr.ynm doss, quarter-mlle buffer zone between homes and Inn rnand.v mn.. waste-treated fields.The current requirement Is Check it outl 500 feet. Win tickets for 2 he The British are Combat Presented by the However. the board postponed the discussion for based sailors Rlverslde one week because Supervisor Roy Wilson was county Phllharmonle Moreofyourfaverai rnmda absent. now online! chug*out au1 new Fam6y. Laurie Koch Thrower can be reached by e-mall at a 5thnlnuela ale+= enni Ithroe o pe enm or by phone at(909)248-6130. A.M. MMEEM c."t — m Published Lf4Ra01 a lh-d nl ton Imn Indnnn Markii..a Send comments to hernhock0s andam eonl'ne don, ' Pmn...vnrr l.. wnn PrenTe* Take hnu,,4nnw no In n new I°v°I w11h vlNml Fmm,Innre Rev°at 1,1 Fndn=cme w11F - Coined,Profles of Inland Fnn wm and eehools (c)2001 Thn Pene=.Fnl.r rim rmmn= v Reed our Eoxad,Pnnry Designed and hosted by PF not Comments to le otback®inlandem eaniine.mm. http://www.inlandempireonline.com/news/stories/031401/sludge.shtml 3/14/01 The � I yin ��ed n O B p s = d 'B • a T 0 FREE ADMISSION ! LISTEN UP ! • Combined Earth Day and Ottan Discovery Day • Environmental Exhibits Kayak Tours • Refreshments Avsllable D • Science e s Actwry cs • Sei<ntt Discovery and Craft Booths • We welcome members of Bike the Bay WHERE SheltmakeA Dunes entrance nce o Back mile Dr.) of Newport Dunes entnntt on Rack Bay Ocl WHEN Saturday,April 21.2001, 10.00a.m,to 3,00p.m. CALL 949-640-6746 HOSTS Z Newport Bay Nat Friends OC Hahors Bc �d Parks California D + and Game Nonom Monica Mazur ;.z CTIVITIES ! pY .re r.r. n af:f• .n.. SUMMIT WATER INVESTORS, L.P. 7817 Ivanhoe Avenue,Suite 201 La Jolla,CA 92037-4540 (800)826-6677 Fax:(858)456-6269 March 5, 2001 BARRON'S — Cover Story With bottled water nearly as expensive as gasoline, and water,in general growing more dear, some smart firms are buying up supplies all around the world. An investment idea that can't miss." The world's thirst for water makes it the next promising commodity play By Harlan S. Byrne Water is natures paradox--both plentiful and rare. It covers 70% of the Earth's surface, yet only 1% of it is potable. In natural form,it's free; in bottled form,it can cost more than a gallon of gasoline. And while flooding and monsoons kill tens of thousands around the globe each year,about 40%of the world's almost six billion people live in lands where rainfall is modest or almost nonexistent,and clean water is scarce. At a time when there's fear that the global climate might be changing in ways that could make droughts more common in now-temperate zones, and with the world's population still expanding, demand for water is relentlessly rising. And so is water-industry consolidation and the prospects of the companies that supply clean H2O to the developed lands. In the U.S. alone, some studies suggest, as much as$1 trillion is needed over the next 20 years to upgrade and replace the nation's aging and deteriorating water infrastructure. Interest groups tied to the water industry claim that there is currently a $23 billion annual gap in known spending plans and the availability of funds. Those groups are pushing for more federal money to make up for funding cuts in recent years, which trimmed annual federal outlays on water projects to a mere $2 billion a year. While the Bush Administration is unlikely to treat proposals for$50 billion a year in spending kindly, there's no doubt that, over the long term,the country will have to improve its crucial water systems and undertake some big projects. An extreme example, long under way: New York City is building a third water tunnel,24- feet wide in some places,to augment the two existing ones that bring it water from upstate reservoirs and which are leaking millions of gallons a day. The tunnel was started in the'Seventies,and some estimates put its completion date at 2020 or even 2025. And in many areas of the world outside the developed lands,the need for improved water systems is similarly pressing,and sometimes far worse. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, in a recently published survey of experts'opinions, included a large section on water problems and how they may affect international tensions in the next 15 years.Though striking a mostly optimistic tone,the study pointed to the likelihood of continued scarcity in the Middle East,Africa, South Asia and China,with the potential for armed conflicts.Many areas of Latin America,including Mexico,also are afflicted by poor water quality and scarcities. Recently, some investors in the U.S. and Europe have been listening to walces siren call. A big impetus: The global industry's two largest companies, Vivendi Environment and Suez Lvonnaise des Eaux,both Paris-based,are expected to list their stocks in the States,possibly this year.That's in keeping with their invasion ofNonh America over the past three years through investments in water utilities and major water-treatment and wastewater operations. Other European water March 5,100J BARRON'S—Cover Story companies are likely to Float shares here,too,as theyjoin the trek to America,currently the most lucrative market for water companies. At the same time, steady earnings and sometimes substantial dividends have created fans for the approximately half-dozen U.S. water companies whose shares trade actively. Those fans have grown in number as the overall market has stumbled. And rumors of takeovers have sparked interest in a number of thinly-traded water stocks. Certainly, the potential for further consolidation is strong. There are roughly 55,000 water systems in the U.S., including hundreds of closely held ones. But many of these are small. Indeed,just 20%of them provide about 80%of the nation's water.The biggest share of the U.S. supply(excluding water used for crop irrigation and manufacturing).comes from big. city systems. But many metropolises, faced with aging distribution lines and creaky treatment plants,are at least thinking about linking with private partners or selling their systems in private operators outright. "Water stock fundamentals look good and,over time,the stocks should continue showing gains as they have in recent years, if not outperforming the market as much as last year when takeovers gave an extra boost,"declares one of the biggest bulls on the industry,Debra Coy of Schwab Capital Markets. Companies such as American Water Works and Philadelphia Suburban which have grown markedly through acquisitions, have become favorites of analysts and money managers, including Tim Winter of A.G. Edwards.Joseph Coyle of Edward Jones, and Walter Kirchberger of UBS Warburg,Hugh Evans of T.Rowe Price,and Owen Quattlebaum of Avalon Trust. With good reason. The pros have made a lot of money for their clients by betting correctly in recent years that companies such w United Water Resources,E"rown,Aquarion and Consumers Water would be taken over. And the buyouts will continue,as many small utilities decide that they'd rather cash out than compete against the big boys. That's just fine with Voorhees, New Jersey-based American Water Works, the biggest U.S. water outfit. Even though regulators recently thwarted its plans to buy a California utility, CEO James Bear is staying on the acquisition trail. "Size does make a difference,"he maintains. Prominent among water companies likely to go on the block arc those owned by electric or gas utilities,which have decided they don't need the units for diversification and could use the extra cash for other purposes. Among them are Sierra Pacific Resources,which made a deal recently to sell its water business. Also in this camp are Ii ,which wants to divest its Indianapolis Water unit,and j=, which has had difficulty making a go of the flock of small water utilities it purchased over the past few years. Likely to pop up soon are properties in Argentina and the U.K.bought at hefty prices by Azure ,an operation spun off by pipeline and energy-trading giant Emon.Azurix,which had hoped to compete internationally with the likes of Vivendi and Suez, has seen those two giants beat it out of a number of deals abroad. Because of weakness in Azurix's earnings and stock price,Enron is buying back the company,preparatory,it seems,to dismantling it. Germany's RWE.a large diversified electric utility that has shown a sudden interest in water companies,has bought Thames Water, a major British supplier, for more than $6 billion. The plan came to light last year before the ink was dry on a Thames deal to invade the U.S.by having Thames acquire E'Town,a Westfield,New Jersey,water utility. One utility that seems perfectly happy with its water properties is Allele, the new name of the former Minnesota Power. Though water isn't Allete's main business, its holdings in Florida and North Carolina have been profitable. One of the company's operations is a desalination plant serving Memo Island on the Sunshine State's Gulf Coast. Conversion of see water is growing in importance in Florida, where the underground water level has dropped rapidly because of drought, heavy crop irrigation needs and a fast-growing population. But suppliers aren't the only water companies attracting investors'attention.Outfits that offer products and the planning and management expertise needed to ensure the safety of water supplies have drawn admiring glances from Wall Street,too. Doing nicely in recent years have been the shares of a score or more U.S. companies focused on water and wastewater treatment.The names include Cuno,Ionics,Insimform and Tetra Tech. Interest in water-technology stocks has been stoked, in part,by safety concems,spurred in the U.S.by the well-publicized contamination of Milwaukee's water system in 1993, That disaster resulted in a number of deaths and illnesses,the kind of outbreak commonplace in many undeveloped areas of the world. -2- March 5,2001 BARRON'S—Cover Story An earlier boon to the industry was the Clean Water Act of 1972 and the many local laws it inspired stiffening water- quality regulations. Hugh Evans,an analyst at T.Rowe Price,is particularly fond of non-utility water stocks.Among his favorites is Insitufomr, whose shares his fern began acquiring at 6 a few years ago and which recently was trading in the mid-30s.T.Rowe now owns about 12% of the outstanding shares. Iasimform has been wildly successful using stateof-the-art techniques for cleaning out water and sewer lines without disruptive and time-consuming digging operations. Another non-utility that's attracted some analytical interest is Oaden Corp.,whose main business is energy,but which also supplies chemicals,filters,pumps and other apparatus necessary for roaming a water system. A noteworthy example of this breed is the giant conglomerate Two International whose flow-control group is involved in many facets of the water business, most prominently through its Earth Tech unit,based in Long Beach, California. Earth Tech employs 7,500 people in more than 150 offices throughout the world and boasts$1 billion in annual sales. One of its stated goals is to become the leading provider of water and wastewater management in the U.S.But it faces stiff competition from Vivendi,which made a big entry into the American market with its$6 billion acquisition of U.S.Filter two years ago. Suez also is very much in this game,having picked up United Water Resources and Nalco Chemical. A recent 55-page study by Richard C. Eastman, an aradyst with Robert W. Baird a Co., pointed to the diversity of the opportunities to invest in the water industry, Eastman focused on just one group••what he termed the filtrationtseparalion segment.Still,his report covered a dozen outfits,including Cum,Ionics,Milling Osmenlca, Calgon Carbon,and ESQ. The letter's stake in water is comparatively small, but includes a profitable business producing filter cartridges for Brita water-filtering pitchers for the consumer bade. Getting clean water has been a challenge for centuries.While the ancient Greeks and Romans managed to build networks of aqueducts to carry pure water from higher ground, later Europeans -- especially in the Middle Ages -- often fell prey to diseases, such as cholera and typhoid by drinking water befouled by human and animal waste and other pollutants. No wonder that modem Europeans favor bottled water—a substance that,when bought in small bottles in the U.S.,often costs more than a gallon of gasoline. The Emopeams who emigrated to North America in the 17th and 18th centuries generally found a good supply of clean aqua. But,according to the book Water for Gotham,that wasn't always the case.Indeed,the paucity of good drinking water was blamed for encouraging the imbibing of spirits and--who knows?--might have been the inspiration for the three-martini lunch. Slogging it out in the U.S.and in much of the rest of the world are the two French giants—Vivendi Enviromment and Suez. The former, which has both energy and water operations, is a spinoff from Vivendi Universal, which still owns 72% of Vivendi Environment.The spinoff went public last year in an initial offering of 77 million shares at a price of 32.5 Wos;it recently traded as high as 49 euros.That's near the price target set earlier this year by Mark Lewis, an analyst at Deutsche Bank.But Lewis hasn't issued a sell or hold signal yet,convinced that,over time,the shares could move still higher,perhaps after the company issues its 2000 earnings report this week.Another catalyst for improvement could be the expected start of trading in the U.S.this year. Recent revenue reports for last year put Vivendi's water business at about S12 billion,versus$9 billion for Suez.Lewis has been particularly impressed by Vivendi's recent wins of water and related contracts in major European cities,such as Berlin and Prague. In the U.S.,Vivendi has an 18%stake in Philadelphia Suburban, though it isn't clear yet whether the French concern will seek to buy all of its American cousin.In any case,its main holding in the States is U.S. Filter,perhaps the globe's largut operator of wastewater systems for public utilities,which increasingly are outsourcing such operations. In turn, U.S. Filter's ownership of Culligan also gives Vivendi a big presence in bottled and other purified water for residences and businesses--an estimated$2 billion-a-year market,one in which there's no major pure play. "Opportunity in the U.S. is outstanding," says Andy Seidel, head of Vivendi's North American operations. Because of its dominance in many outsourcing markets,Vivendi is considering seeking more contracts to operate water utilities directly, an activity he considers a bit more risky. -3- March 5,2001 BARRON'S—Cover Story Suez Lyonnaise has taken a somewhat different path in the U.S.Its main entree to the States came through its purchases of Nalco Chemical, a large water-treatment company two years ago,and of United Water Resources,a northern New Jersey- based utility and service provider,last year.Through United Water Resources,Suez gained a foothold in Allan's water and wastewater operations. United Water Resources earlier had a role in helping straighten out and ran Milwaukee's operation. Now, reports Jew- Michel Brault,who came from Paris to head up North American operations,a number of potential new deals lie ahead in the municipal water field. Hoping to capitalize on earlier successes, United Water is bidding, along with others, to manage the New Orleans water system,which is larger than Atlanta's.The company also hopes to win a contract to operate Phoenix's system. Desalination — the desalting of seawater -- is becoming a more important venture for a number of countries -- and companies. The stepped-up interest reflects the declining cost of desalted water, which has fallen to around$2 per 1,000 gallons. That's about one-fifth of the level a few years ago,but still newly double the cost of water from many freshwater purification plants. A big factor in the price decline: improved technology, especially membrane-based methods of separating salt from seawater. Leading the way has been Ionics,a Watertown,Massachusetts-based company with interests in 50 plants in the Caribbean, including the largest in the region,a plant in Trinidad capable of handling 29 million gallons a day. Ionics also hu interests in plants in the U.S.--and is seeking ventures in Israel,Jordan and Singapore. Also in the desalination more is Ogden Corp. Having undergone a restructuring over the past few years, it is focusing mainly on independent elecuic-power projects,but is giving increasing attention to water and wastewater projects,mainly in Florida. In January, Ogden agreed with Poseidon Resources, a water-project developer,to design, build and operate a 25- million-gallon a day drinking-water facility in Tampa Bay. Earlier,Ogden had won a contract to design,build and operate a wastewater facility at Key Largo,Florida.And it recently opened a water facility in Bessemer,Alabstna. Some water stocks,particularly those of am[[utilities,are too thinly-traded for large institutions.But a number have drawn strong support from individual investors, impressed by their issuers' earnings and growth records. Consider, for example, Connecticut Water.Pennichuck,Consolidated Water.Artesian Resources,and York Water,the last a newcomer to Nasdaq. York Water, whose stock usually trades in a mere hundreds of shares daily, was founded in 1916, and at one time was supplying only I IS early customers in its hometown of York, Pennsylvania, using three miles of pipe fashioned from hollowed oak logs.York earned S1.25 a sham last year,aided by a favorable rating in a rate cue.It is expected to net close to$1.30 this year.Best of all,from some investors'point of view,its thin float and good results could make it an attractive takeover target. Resisting the temptation to go public in a big way is Utilities Inc.Based in the Chicago area,with 235,000 customers in 16 states, mostly in the Southeast, Utilities Inc. has a newly unmatched record of growth and has been sought by many acquisition-minded companies.CPA James L.Cameron says the company considered going public with a stock offering two years ago,but recognized that might lead to its acquisition,something most shareholders apparently opposed. The company's revenues grew 13%last year,to more than$64 million,while net income jumped 17%,to over$10 million. And Utilities inc.'s stock has climbed 10%,to 28.50 from 26 a year ago. If things go as well as Cameran expects,Utilities Inc.could become one of the more intriguing investments in an intriguing industry,if it isn't acquired first. -4- Date: February S,2001 Orange County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2001 PLANT NO. ______________________________ 1 Jan I I Feb I I Mar 11 Apr If Ma Jun T Jul 11 AM If Sao Oct If Nov 11 Dec If Mre e 1/1T M� � Total:PLANT NO,2 Jan Feb If Mar 11 Aar If May Jun d Jul 11 AugSep Ha Oct [e Nov 11 Oeo ; va no Pant Nake TOWI: O Colleellon Svatema Jan Feb If Mar Apr May Jun I Jul If Au Se Oct If Nov 11 0. 11 va m vl no trz0 m 2,7 no led so v1e no =7 no• vzr no• vn rw' 2/zT np v28 no pNlep was Cdl.: Tolel 0 Total o Tolel TOlal Tole) Total Total Total Total Total TOWI Total NJO:YSH:cf..11 This spreadsheet does not include in-house odor complaints g:tezcel.dlzlom\Odor Complaint Log.lds Jam _ Groundwater 50 w Replenishment System "rez- 2 MEMORANDUM Date: March 1, 2001 To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Orange County Sanitation District: Orange County Water District: Director Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Director Iry Pickier, Chair Director Brian Donahue Director Philip L. Anthony Director Russell Patterson Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Director Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Director Jerry King, Alternate No. 1 Director Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Director Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Director Shawn Boyd, Alternate No. 3 Director Jan Flory, Alternate No. 3 From: Tom Dawes g7O Subject: Articles Enclosed for your review is a copy of an article that appeared in the Orange County Register today, Friday, March2, written by Chris Reed. In response to comments at the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting on March 1, also enclosed is background information on water supply charges since the last drought (1987-92), generally for environmental reasons. (Critical Water Shortage Contingency Plan, Govemor's Advisory Drought Planning Panel, December 29, 2000) To be sure, MWD and others have taken many measures to offset water losses. 1:10ocumenlWdv PlnLJOGWR51LetteniWemosU=(1-5-2)=01 Wrticles 3-2-01.doc Enclosures cc: Blake Anderson William R. Mills Jr. A jsau elrmt o(the 0ra19e County Wam,Dw.and the Oxq,County San mu,Diana (714) 378-3200 . Fax (7I41 378-3381 • 10500 Ellis Avenue . Founmin Valley . California 92708 Orange County Register Questions and Friday, March 2, 2001 answers on the Page 1 Local News water project The Orange County Register Sewage waste would be turned into drinking water in a program doubts about the pro- proposed by the Orange County But Bannister and Swan, Si;act clearly extend beyond its Water D'soct and the Orange who both also serve on the y County Sanoation D'atncL MWD board, cite MWD state- loudest critics.A newly elected Q Why do we need to increase menns that it's not expecting water district board member the water supply+ supsays however "well-inten- A Orange Cou is a semi-arid and that ly ages any timewatunCounty and that"interruptible"water- nosed" the Protect is, it's not region,and th population of 29 water that MWD can divert to necessarily)tthink t million b expected to rise to 32 other customers-will be avail- "I do not flunk there is an million by 2020.About 300,OW of MWD supply problem," says those 400,000 additional le able at then per acre-foot for Denis Bilodeau of Orange.'7e will live in north and central p nine of the next 1t years. should maybe look at an in- Swan says that even given cremental roach" The Orange county, area with a the four-year lead time for ePP groundwater tablele that cannot ful- building the Project, this Orange County Groundwater fill everyone's needs_Imported wa- a- means all the county,districts producers, the association of ter has long been used to replenish most do for the next several water districts and private the aquifer.A recent decision by years is Proceed with a $187 agencies that pump the water the US Interior De m rtme also million overhaul of a de[erio- amdous about the numbers.reaching consumers, also is sulk on'California toreduce its do rating water plant in Fountain Last week, the association Penderae on Colorado River water Valley. within 15 years, In the interim, the districts formally questionecithe county Purifying sewage water and al- could seek more grants on top districts' me of higher-cast lowing it W settle into the ground- of the $57 million already re- MWD supplies in project plan- water basin could ease the ex- ceived from the state and fed- ning-the same point made by pecrry tightening of supplies eral governments for the re- Bannister and Swan Microfiltration,reverse osmosis and plenishment project And also last week, the Ir- ultraviolet disinfection would be vine Ranh Water District - used at a treatment ant in Fuun- But Mills says that approach w one of the association's largest twin Valleympurifywaste water, risks a supply r all the And members-issued a statement in says that, for all the warn- endorsing a based.in ap ding would lien be piped to sw- ings about cost, the project P ding ponds in Anaheim. would have a slight effect on proarL ro the outiouproject. Q.Now math would this plan in most customers' water bills - I'or very cautious about go- crease the water duce perhaps 45 cents a month a lot (The districts)use A h would product more than "This is a visionary a lot of assumpnons;'saidasso- 70,000 acre-feet of water r nary project;" ciation Chairman Patrick Scao- p° 1� Mills said. Ion of the Southern California by 2005 and as muds as 130,000 by But Swan says the extra cost µ,aim,CO. 2020,about twat irds of the ex- would be much higher than the Still, Scanlon said he had no petted new demand for rorthcen- districts' estimates, enough [o tral Orange County.The rest hurt poor people. doubt the project would be all 51)1 acre-feet would come from Proved come March 28-even comenretion and imported Nevertheless,Anderson and ported supplies if it is"a little bit ahead of its South county relies almost entire Mills appear supremely cosh- time." mY b den[that their view will carry on Imported water because it has the day come March 28.It will little usable groundwater. take only a majority vote of ►Contact Reed at(714)2852862 Q.Now much will pudfiaeon of both districts' boards to all or at creedlinotesfreedom.mm sewage hint? prove the project, which will A The first phase would cast be funded with a mix of cap- $352 million;future phases would ftW_ Staff writer Pat Brennan comrib- bring the total to f600 million. uni rovement fonds and used to this report. Q.Who would pay7 borrowed money. A The two agenda will pay for the Protect and both have been seeking grams North county sewer and water rota would rise by as much as$1 a month to help pay for the project The same rate in- creases would result even without the project to pay for alternative sources of water. Q.It it safe to drink purified waste water? A The two agencies say it is be- ause the sewage would be treated then placed in the groundwater basin Percolation into the basin would fiber the water further. Orange County Register Friday, March 2, 2001 Page 1 Local News TAKING WASTE OUT OF WASTE WATER Anaheim + _ C `fat l ties9 A$600 million plan to pipe treated waste water from Fountain Valley to Anaheim,where 0 would :� \l ' _ Ground-water percolate into the ground water basin,is meant to ease an expected tightening of water supplies .Rim -\ Ir ; ,basin boundary in coming years.But some local water officials are raising objections.Here is how the project j— \ I would work: �e• l O -J OUNCE N Cris and r silty and m e .:Waste water. Waste waters r Bum water is rather salty and must 6e Bo percent is �� f -T; ' treated to make it drinkable. discharged into the sea. - waste 4water The O.C.Water District r,wants to salvage some of the 245 million gallons of \ a.00 treated waste water discharged into the gcean every ' . day. Treated water is sent ©Microfiltration to 1.olding pools and the removes larger -. Santa Ana River bed. - - substancessuchW - viruses and bacteria. ©Reverse ''I re osmosis re moves _ particles at the HOWm molecular level " 9 r and gets rid of + the salty taste QPurified wateris 'rater tablepumped to the surface and could be treated with REVERSE WHAT? ©PercoWtfon purf lesthe »? chlorine to fole It show uI Here's how reverse osmosis works: water,with the impurbtes fINer'up I in your house. Pacific 1.Pressurized waste 2.Impurities are out in the porous rock It takes ocean water is pumped trapped in about a year to percolate down through membrane. membrane,leaving the water table. purified water 3.Purified water is , Waste squeezed into pipe. water = - SIZE COMPARISON If a water molecule ..then a virus would ...and a bacterium were the size ofa be the size of would be the size of tennis ball... tractor-trailer... Luxor in Las Membrane I Vegas. Source:Orange _ water d rw County Water Dislrid ... - water C ��6'(� GEORGE TURNEY/The Register Critical Water Shortage Contingency Plan Governor's Advisory Drought Planning Panel December 29, 2000 Changes in Water Management Conditions Introduction Since 1987-1992 Drought In the relatively short time since the 1987-92 incorporated changes to CVP operations drought, significant changes in California's to provide additional cold water in water management framework have spawning areas downstream from Shasta occurred.These changed conditions include Dam, and closures of Delta Cross-Channel changes in regulatory and institutional gates.The 1993 opinion also provided conditions affecting use of surface water and numerical take limits at Banks and Ttacy groundwater, construction of new water Pumping Plants, and for further supply facilities, legislative changes, and temperature control operations at Lake pending implementation of CALFED actions. Shasta. The CVP was required to main- This chapter describes these changes and tain a minimum Shasta September discusses their water management storage of at least 1.9 mat except in the implications. Information in this chapter is driest yews. (Shasta storage declined to summarized from two primary sources: 0.6 maf during the 1976-77 drought and DWR's July 2000 drought preparedness to 1.3 maf during the 1987-92 drought.) report and the CALFED August 2000 Record The Central Valley Project Improvement of Decision. Act of 1992 reallocated 800 taf of CVP water supply from project contractors to Changes in Surface Water fishery purposes,plus additional project Management Conditions supply to provide firm water for wildlife refuges.Annual Trinity River instream Changed surface water management flows of at least 340 taf were to be conditions since the 1987-1992 drought have provided until a flow study conducted by a significant impact on the operational the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was flexibility and water delivery capabilities of completed, at which time new flow the SWP and CVP. Table 2-1 summarizes requirements would be established. (The changes since the last drought.These and Secretary of Interior signed a ROD estab- other changes are discussed in more detail lishing new Trinity River flows in below. December 2000, as described in more detail below). The act directed the • In 1992,the National Marine Fisheries Secretary to carry out structural and Service issued its first biological opinion for winter-run Chinook salmon, then nonstructural environmental restoration listed as threatened under the Encian- actions,including water acquisition for gored Species Act. NMFS followed with a fishery and wildlife refuge purposes. One 1993 long-term biological opinion;winter- completed major structural restoration rum were reclassified to endangered project is the$80+million Shasta Dam status in 1994. Both biological opinions Temperature Control Device, which Govemor's Adviwry Drought Planning Panel Critical water 5h nage Contingency Plan 2-1 Chapter 2:Changes in Water Management CgndRlgn,Since 1997-1992 Drought TABLE 2-1 Recent Actions Affecting California Water Supplies Action Year Description SWRCB Orders WR 90-05 and 1990 and 1991 Water rights orders that modified CVP water rights to WR 91-01 incorporate temperature control objectives in Upper Sacramento River. National Marine Fisheries 1992. 1993.and 1995 Established criteria for operations to protect winter-run Service Biological Opinions Chinook salmon. Public Law 102-575,Title 34 1992 Mandated changes in management of the CVP, particularly for the protection,restoration,and enhancement of fish and Wildlife. Monterey Agreement& 1994 Modified SWP water contracts to facilitate contractors' Amendments management of project and non-project supplies available to them. SWRCB Derision 1631 1994 Modified water rights for diversions from Morro Lake. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1993, 1994,and 1995 Established operational criteria to protect Delta smelt. Biological Opinions Bay-Delta Plan Accord and 1994 and 1995 Agreement and associated SWRCS order that provided SWRCB Order WR 95-06 for operations of the CVP and SWP to protect Bay- Delta water quality.Also provided for further evaluation of Bay-Delta operations,which is being pursued under the CALFED process. NMFS Biological Opinions 1996 and 1997 Established criteria to protect who salmon and steelhead In wastal streams. NMFS ESA listing1999 Spring-run Chinook listing. USFWS ESA listing 1999 Splittail listing. reduces the need to forgo power offered to the contractors. All but two generation at Shasta to provide cold contractors (Plumas County Flood water for salmon. CVPIA also authorized Control and Water Conservation District transfers of project water outside the and Empire West Side Irrigation District) CVP's service area, subject to specified subsequently accepted the amendments, conditions. which are described in detail in • Delta smelt were listed as threatened in Chapter 3.The amendments changed the 1993.The primary water management prior method of allocating water supply action associated with their listing has deficiencies,which reduced supplies to been reduction of CVP and SWP exports agricultural contractors before those of from the Delta when the smelt are when contractors were cut. Supplies are present new the pump intakes and now allocated among contractors in forebays. proportion to their contractual entitle- ments.The amendments also reduced • The Monterey Agreement, signed by the the SWP's total contractual commitment Department and SWP contractors in as part of the transfer of the Kern Water 1994, established principles to be incorporated in contract amendments Bank to two contractors, and further (the Monterey Amendments) to be Provided thatt 13 130 taf of agricultural contractors' entitlements could be sold GovernoYs Advisory Dmught Planning Panel 2-2 Critical Water Shortage Contingency Plan Chapter 2:Changes in Water Management Conditlons Since 1981-1"20rought to urban contractors.Contractors are Program's three chief activities— allowed to store project water outside establishing water quality standards, their service area boundaries and to have coordinating operations of the CVP and access to project facilities for wheeling SWP to meet water quality and environ- non-project water. The amendments also mental protection requirements, and created a turnback pool for internal developing a long-term solution to Delta annual reallocation of project water problems. In 1995, SWRCB adopted a among project contractors, and provided water quality control plan incorporating dry year rate relief for agricultural concepts contained in the Accord, contractors. Implementation of the followed by an interim order. Order WR Monterey Amendments has been the 95-6 provided that the CVP and SWP subject of litigation regarding CEQA would meet Bay-Delta Accord standards, compliance. In December 2000 the State while SWRCB developed a new water Supreme Court declined to hear DWR's right decision to apportion the responsi- petition seeking review of lower court bility for meeting standards among all decisions, and the case has been returned users of Delta water. SWRCB's process to to Superior Court. develop a new decision remains ongoing. • SWRCB adopted Decision 1631 in 1994, Table 2-2 summarizes the major changes amending the City of Los Angeles' rights from the former D-1485 to WR 95-6. to divert from the Mono Lake Basin, in CALFED released a first draft program- order to increase Mono Lake levels.The matic environmental impact report/ decision restricted diversions from the environmental impact statement for a basin to 16 taf/year until the lake level long-term Delta solution in 1998, reached elevation 6391, at which time followed by a redraft in 1999. The Record diversions would be allowed to increase of Decision was signed on August 28, to about 31 taVyear, about one-third of 2000, marking the end of CALFED's historical diversions.Los Angeles planning phase and a transition to initial implemented an aggressive water implementation of some CALFED actions, conservation program emphasizing including its environmental restoration plumbing fixture retrofits—with substan- program. A discussion of pending tial State financial assistance—to help CALFED implementation actions is compensate for the shortfall.The City included at the end of this chapter. Since estimated that it replaced 750,000 toilets 1994,the CALFED Operations Group has during the 1990s. Between 1994 and been serving as the forum for coordinat- 1999, the Legislature appropriated$17.5 ing day-today CVP and SWP operations million out of an authorized$36 million with requirements for protecting listed to help Los Angeles implement demand species.Decisions have been based on use reduction measures. of neat real-bate monitoring data to • The Bay-Delta Accord, executed as a identify locations of listed migratory and three-year agreement in 1994 and then resident species in the Delta and subsequently extended, set forth the upstream rivers,together with take data State-federal CALFED Bay-Delta at the pumping plants. Governor's Advisory Drought Planning Panel Critical Water shortage Contingency Plan 2-3 Chapter 2:Changes in Water Management Conciltions5ince 1962-19920r0ueht TABLE 2-2 Major Changes in Delta Operations Criteria between D-1485 and SWRCB Order 95-06 Delta Operations Criteria Primary Changes Water Year Classiflcation D-1485:Sacramento River Index _ WR 9506:40.3030 Index . Sacramento River Flows Flows at Rio Vista are higher from September to December under WR 95-06 Sera Joaquin RNar Fbws Minimum flows and pulse flows are included under WR 95.0E Vemalis Selinby Requirement Salinity requirements are more restrictive during the irrigation season and less restrictive during other months under WR 95-M .. . .-...- .-utim—c.. ..__..._ Delia OuMow, t :Outilax arteria requlmd to maintain 2 parts par thousand sallnity udder many _.. precipitation conditions from February through June under WR 95-06� _ Export Limits A 35%-65%export to Delta inflow ratio from April 15 to May 15 under WR 9505 • A 1996 Federal Energy Regulatory court subsequently ordered that USFWS Commission settlement agreement re-examine the listing decision,during among the City and County of which time period the CVP and SWP San Francisco,Modesto Irrigation were not to bear any increased District,Turlock Irrigation District,DFG, reductions in water deliveries resulting and others provided for increased from splittail listing. instream flows in the Tuolumne River. The agreement reduces water supplies In May 2000, the Colorado River Board available to MID and TID. A 1998 FERC released its latest draft of a plan settlement agreement among East Bay outlining steps to reduce California's use Municipal Utility District,DFG,and of river water to the State's basic USFWS similarly provided for increased 4.4 maf apportionment,in years when lnstream flows in the Mokeluaune River. surplus river water Is not available. California water users have historicaily According to EBMUD, its reduced exceeded the basic apportionment by a; Mokelumne River supplies correspond to much as 900 taf because of availability of a supplemental water need of about surplus water and Arizona's and 180 taf per year. Nevada's unused apportionments. MWD • In 1996 and 1997, NMFS listed coho is the most junior California water user; if salmon in two coastal areas as the interstate apportionments enforced threatened In 1997, NMFS ilsted two in a year when surplus water was not coastal steelhead populations as available, the Colorado River Aqueduct threatened and one as endangered, would be only half full.Work to complete followed by 1998 listing of Central Valley California's draft Colorado River Water steelhead as threatened.In 1999, Central Use Plan is continuing.The plan is based Valley spring-run Chinook and coastal on the concept that the CRA will be kept Chinook were listed as threatened. Hill by transfers of conserved agricultural USFWS listed Sacramento splittail as water (such as the Imperial Irrigation threatened in 1999, but a July 2000 District/SDCWA transfer), by water saved federal district court decision found that through lining the All American and listing to be arbitrary and capricious.The Coachella Canals,by implementing new 2 9 Governors Advisory Drought Planning Panel Critical Water Shortage Cantingency Plan Chapter 2:Changes in Water Management Conditions Since 1967-1992 Drought groundwater storage projects, and by San Wits ReservoirDrawd'aam -,�, ,r :..' implementing interim Lake Mead - �,;,:My-�,yis� =;€. in three of thelastfou ors under,9g neral wet operations criteria.The groundwater c rma,, e.+��+.• ;•>' hydrologic ondiiioni)op 2tionsrecasts for San storage projects would cake surplus river Luis Reservoir ajomt-us'efadllty afthe&O anHWR. „ water, when available, and recharge it in have projected thaClate tunic„-ro rage in the2maf`, groundwater basins new the aqueduct. reservoirwputd d[,yopV' I 'aaf;theiffeep projected drawdownS. rC emu rc�uted 'K` The draft plan will be finalized subse- �- +ems•.-�« Delta racy P' �m11—A, amel�y*9 of quent to the completion of the environ- and Tracy Pumping,Piantsaarolected dtaH'w�•owns of .. : mental reviews and execution of agree- this magnkude�eate operabona•L"'e6�assfo��VP-,; ments associated with the plan. " and SWPcongaaors..� Algal blooms occTfierr me resetvolr a ;'Ilse • In December 2000, the Secretary of 300taf stotagelevir e'�21orn's etart'J ea d'- Interior signed a ROD establishing higher odor problgms'for5 to ara V•aa I . ater fsmR instream flows in the Trinity River. From Customers an o enf- 1981 to 1990, USBR provided annual Plants Spikes'rn alwafer ...ry dNon--.: .ally create problems. rota 'jg - ala instream flows of 287 taf in drought ','manufattuin d r?ma a Is. years and 340 taf in wet years, `.located atthe-j f'braget corresponding to roughly 25 percent of A potential interNetmrs imC�V2del g , the river's average annual flow. In 1991, peak summer enodsMi "L take contin D t e fast m the Secretary directed that flows be 9 ins, in ne0a a -an rm.:uta' increased to 340 taf annually, the amount groundwater redta Band• rtPang;d�'elivenes y=i from more ra ?t11r ]jlelat�e p subsequently required by CVPIA pending dwdownsfia dat�tieenzve -lug a completion of USFWS's instream flow combination o o s studies. The new ROD establishes - contractors,an. 0Di w er Cor ons�{t iat lessened peals instream flows ranging from 369 taf to - 815 taf, depending on water year type, The San Lug-M • Po of saacates chal , and results in an estimated 48 percent of prici enges.for"� Dry�oil nkin P protects in . h 'F2o"�-"fify`3�'`�a o round average annual river flow remaining in water is cdrfenan�_ ce' .I.n fh"eLential:_alley x the river. Exports of Trinity River water to portion ogthe atio`tm70pe enEwh ch B +: the CVP service area will be earmarked forica interstsiS ugng�,g condidorm p a' ndwaterbao lg correspondingly reduced. projecu'recoveryveils� ostiffi - eetsemce Many of these changes in laws, regulations, area peak demands Isto {a�"1 waled- been �.. borrowed from 5a-n{iilsstorageto;-„gM.f?ezk and institutional conditions reduce water demands,and asthenfi on been Qv three-to supplies historically available to agricultural - five-month penod;afte'hhe ptak p dhas poised. and urban water users, as detailed in the accompanying sidebar.The loss of historically planned in the CALFED program, together available Colorado River water will further with those mandated by CVPIA, could reduce supplies, unless actions now in plan- improve fisheries conditions over the Ding are implemented. long-term to the point that water users The long-term outcome of the CALFED Bay- would not experience further water costs as Delta process is difficult to predict at this a result of environmental regulatory actions. time. It is conceivable that fishery In the near-term, CALFED's proposed restoration and enhancement actions environmental water purchase program is Governor's Advisory Drought Planning Panel Critical Water shortage Contingency Plan 2-5 Chap 1Chanq 'na9ata Mang[ Contlitl s9in 1967.19920m"ht intended to lessen the impacts of fisheries- related operational decisions on CVP and SWP water deliveries.As described later in this chapter, the CALFED ROD commits that in the first four years of CALFED Stage 1 there will be no reductions in CVP and SWP Delta exports beyond baseline regulatory levels as a result of fisheries protection measures. A significant CALFED-related uncertainty with regard to drought preparedness is the process for coordinating CVP and SWP operations in the Delta with environmental protection requirements.Since its inception, the CALFED Operations Group has experi- enced a series of unprecedented wet years. Its ability to simultaneously manage water and fisheries goals has not been tested in a time of water shortage.Wet conditions have allowed CALFED to rely on short-term adap- tive management techniques for fisheries purposes;an approach not consistent with drought water operations,when multi-year operating plans for conserving reservoir . storage are necessary. S[Nr BY:W. MILLS, GM. MGR. 3- 2- 1 : 4:26YM : 714 378 W71 OUWLU 114y0LU30b;8 if L $olt2t, Lg r-r�iL yam„ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: March 2, 2001 TO: GWR System JCC Members a0d Alternates FROM: William R. Mills Jr. SUBJECT: POSSIBLE LOSS OF GRANT FUNDING WITH A DOWNSIZED GWR SYSTEM At Thursday's JCC meeting, the question once again arose as to the potential loss of currently secured grant funding if the GWR System is reduced from the proposed size, producing about 72,000 afy to a smaller project producing only about 23,000 ally (IRWD proposal). Our first grant authorization is a federal authorization of$20,000,000. This was authorized in 1996197, and we have received $3.5 million in appropriations thus far. This project was described to the authorizing Congressional committee and our Congressional delegation as a project whose first phase would produce about 70,000 afy more new water supply than our current production from Water Factory 21. Our contract with the Bureau of Reclamation, the funding authority for this authorization, describes our currently sized project The second grant of$37,000,000 comes from the recently authorized Proposition 13. This proposition was described to the Legislature as water initiatives that would allow agencies to develop local supplies to help offset the shortfall in firm water yield of the State Water Project water. The $2.0 billion bond issue was described as producing about 1,000,000 afy of new water for the State. The Santa Ana Watershed received a $250,000,000 earmark for projects, including GWR System, that would provide about 600,000 of of new waters. GWR's earmark is the $37 million. We are currently working with our Congressional delegation to increase our authorization by$60,000,000. This request is based on cost increases that have occurred because of changes in the project that occurred after the original authorization. These include the decision to provide 100% treatment by Reverse Osmosis, expansion of the pipe size to allow larger(phase 3)flows, incorporation of foundation piles, and construction cost increases. This increase authorization will be t SENT, tsy:w. MILLS, lilt. MLd(. ; r 4:corm : rry ara :fair wn� rrsuo<uoao M 11 L included as a separate bill by Congresswomen Sanchez. The bill will be incorporated into other authorization bills and will probably become a single bill under the Title XVI program. Congressional staff of the House Resources Committee, which has jurisdiction for the program, believes that a bill will be heard this spring. We have requested that the increased GWR System authorization also be included in the reauthorization of the Cal Fed. Congressmen Ken Calvert (Corona/Riverside) Chair of the Energy and Water Subcommittee of the Resources Committee has Indicated that any Cal Fed reauthorization must include Southern California projects and especially projects in the Santa Ana Watershed. In a recent meeting with him, he expressed his support for our project because of the large block of water that could be rapidly developed as an offset to the Bay Delta water losses. Thus,the Cal Fed reauthorization could provide the vehicle to increase our authorization. As indicated, all of our existing and future funding authorizations have as their basis the promise to create new water supplies in the southern part of the State. As you can summarize, a decision to reduce the GWR System production by 49,000 afy would put our existing authorizations in jeopardy and would not allow us to seek the increased Federal authorization as a Cal Fed solution. WRM:jsw c: OCWD Directors Blake Anderson Tom Dawes John Kennedy z The Orange Chanty Reginer l Thursday,March 1,2001 1 THE WAVE 164 T " Water Ireplenishffient: fact VS. 56MA tftrcdl>�ond"aYsof . f� eta a � Ja"ife`tlie�ez an mC... e, ct cT`erk ba"B ` atat nvne Bilt Eo enrd f sfg[eat c}un6,the t AS 1`SEe1T ' ne a9fde�e�ei"split o ffi". "`bTemrb7ri P ur water:Dnvutct and the ones jI� a1s'mf'u"tr.Td waCCliy-the OrsnSe County Samtaboii'Dis- rL' s°enfi'f . to discover t le 0[ask on a regular bi- what their motives really arc. sis.I guess it's normal,and There?afe=threeVergenter sometimes healthy,for citi- taffiw.-g4tys who aze official mns.to criticize government regularsnow Joey-l2acano, and its creations,but I'm eon- LouBbIr and inypersunal- cemed that in this case they favorite,theinuni[able Don- are spreading a considerable- McGee.I have great[expect amount of factually incorrect fortheir persistence in exc information.. cutiag_the irFirst Ainemmnent If you have been reading rights;:; thieactivist's'columnfm, :These tbreelocal activists long,you probably know that take•ori a wide variety of sub- - I am a converted but,fervent jedmatter in a"veryy interest-. proponent,of the water and ing-way.Two of them fre-' sahimttundistricts'Ground gdently pdnfiticate about the wafer Replenishment System. h2zards;und`suspect-eed 16!teengettingagoodbash- srdcPSUf deadlyonethane ing at the podium"lately,and I gas,�gamsms poison am compelled to cleaz up a mg anif occasion- few erroneous claims being alljf�ltgq iffrow+mtsometlung perpetrated as fact-by these aboutYevefs smo31`.sXAfp, - well-intentioned speakers.. three.sp'EdkdP�'falie?trie:Ctity PleaSeseeBOR- Cowcc'ilil,fheAra� onntY . .DEN/Page 15 st sit " � � . a m' INKm. e N M �FOAzp LET Wt —>— amsa CleanWaterNews Volume 111),Issue Two February2DOI - Dedicated to Environmental Improvement for Over 30 Years Will Report Geis Big Roll-Out on Capitol Hill slanding-arom only crowd usmed out for the February 13 release of 'j'z In the Water Infrastructure Network's(WIN) latest report, Water Infrastructure Now: Recommendations for Clean and Safe _ Water in the 21 st Century(WINow).The repon's recommendations were repaired by Detroit Mayor Dennis Archer, President of the National League of Cities.The news conference in the U.S. Capitol featured comments by Congressmen John D.Dingell(D-Mich.). House Water Infrastructure Caucus(WIC) Co-Chair Sherwood L.Bcehlen(R-N.Y.). WIC member Peter DeFazio(D-Ore.), as well as Senator George Voinovich (R-Ohio). Representing AMSA and the wastewater community was William B. Congressmen Sherwcod Ba - J choir of the Water mhr sm,cl, Caucus Schutz,AMSA Board member and peter De Fazio(D-O e J De,,!day rrs Arche,l and AMSA Board Member'WAImm ♦ ca-+t.nccc a-. + Schatz .rho represented the ,oslewoter community during the WINow press boehng. Board Acts on Regulatory Policy Committee Funding Recommendations AMSA to Esomine Nev,Political he recent 2001 Winter Conference of dioxins in biosolids.The leadership Landscape at 2001 Policy Forum . . . . 3 provided a famm for the Association of AMSA's Biosolids Management to discuss substance and strategy on a Committee feels strongly that EPA's National Creating High hop. . . ..Perfonnan . range of regulatory issues,and consider Final dioxin standard could have a major Business Services Workshop. . . .. . . . 4 funding of key initiatives. Upon the rec- impact on publicly owned treatment AMSA Recognized for WIN Efforts, ommendation of the Regulatory Policy works(POTWs)that practice land appli- Nonpoint Publication. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Committee,AMSA's Board of Directors cation.The survey will ensure that Legislative Strategy Session approved two funding requests made by AMSNs dioxin survey is technically and Provides Insight. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 the Biosolids Management Committee. scientifically sound,and will provide AMSA 2001 W nter Conference The Board authorized additional AMSA with the dam necessary to judge Examines Utiliy Infrastructure. . . . . . . 5 Technical Action Fund(TAF)resources the impact of any Agency mlemaking. to complete AMSA's voluntary survey ♦continued on page 3 AMSAs National Office Sniff Grows. . 6 Legal Perspectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 New AMSA Members. . . . . . . . . . . .7 WIN Report Gets Big Roll-Out on Capitol Hill, continued from page 1 General Comrsel of the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District in Cleveland. Ohio.The water supply community was represented by Julius Ciaccia,Water Commissioner for the City of Cleveland Ohio,and Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies Board member. "The time is now to renew the fiscal !!A partnership that will enable us to address 1W the massive funding gaps that are jeop- Wk ardizing America's hard-won water qual- ity gains:'said Schatz."We look forward to working with the Congress.the Bush Administration and our partners at the state and local level to pass legislation that will provide us with a mix of loans. grants and loan subsidies to meet the Der., - _r discusses the t< � needs of all of America's communities:' William 5chce and Executive Director Ken Kure ucriny^trs ane�•r:g,;n:q o� Arcner weighed in with his support of the effort, "Lie staggering cost or rna nbinine. operating 'The Water In Now rehabilitatingand replacing our o in water inaosrructure requires report will serve as a legislative aging ,-. new parrnersiic between lederol, stale and local government.' roadmap, a template as we begin the task of drafting WATER-21. safe water.The report makes the case AMSA staff will join with other WIN Only through close collaboration that the funding increase is urgently organizations to meet with Senators and with the diverse interests represented needed to help close a$23 billion per Representatives to seek their support for by the Water Infrastructure Network, year gap between infrastructure needs the report's recommendations.AMSA can we hope to construct legislation and current spending and makes five key also is urging its members to meet with that addresses the diverse recommendations(see below). their Congressional delegations and state water infrastructure challenges and local officials to gain support for the facingour nation." Psi Over I,500 copies of the report already WIN effort.An electronic version of the Congressman Sherwood flashiest(R-N.Y.), have been delivered to Members of report is available for downloading on Co iq Wafer Infrastructure Coucas Congress,the 50 Governors,President AMSA's web site at www.mnsa-elean- George W. Bush.EPA Administrator waterorg.Copies may also be requested Rep. DeFazio added."Investment in Christine Todd Whitman and others in fmm the National Office.For further water infrastructure also makes sound the Bush Cabinet,mayors,and the information,call Lee Garrfgan at economic sense. For every billion dol- AMSA membership(see Legislarire 202/833-4655.■ lars we invest in environmental infra- Alert(1-02). structure,we create over 30.000 new jobs.While much of Washington is transfixed by the prospects of using WATER INFRASTRUCTURE NOW FIVE KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: enormous tax cuts to stimulate our econ- omy,I believe investment in water infra- ' Authorizing a voriely of financing mechanisms, such as grants, loans, structure should be a vital part of any loan subsidies and credit assistance; economic stimulus package." Focusing on critical 'core" water and wastewater infrastructure needs and The W1Nosv report calls for afive-year, nonpoint source pollution; $57 billion federal investment in drinking Streamlining the federal and store administration of infrastructure funds and water,sewer and slormwater infrasuuc- adequately financing stole programs; lure to replace aging pipes,upgrade Establishing a new program fair technology and management innovation treatment systems and continue to protect to reduce cosh, prolong the life of Americas water infrastructure,and improve public health and the environment.The productivity;and report also urges Congress to create a long-term,sustainable,and reliable ' Providing expanded,targeted technical assistance to communities most in need. source of federal funding for clean and AMSA to Examine New Political Landscape at 2001 Policy Forum ith AMSA's issues receiving —are center stage as the new Congress cap an afternoon of member visits to heightened attention from the and Administration begin their work Capitol Hill.Additionally,AMSA's Bush Administration and the 107th in earnest.It is essential that AMSA's National Environmental Achievement Congress,the Association's 2001 continuing presence in Washington be Award winners will be honored and the National Environmental Policy Forum& heightened through the participation of Association's dynamic committees will 31stAnnual Meeting could not be more its members as critical initiatives receive meet.The Forum also features the timely or provocative.The Policy Forum, attention.This is one conference that Association's Annual Business The New Political Landscape...Moving you should not miss. Meeting,the election of new board the POTWAgenda Forward,will take members and officers,and a special place May 19-23,2001 at the Marriott Members of Congress and high-ranking performance by the political satire at Metro Center in Washington,DC. officials from the U.S.Environmental troupe,The Capitol Steps. Protection Agency and other federal Member Presence Essential as AMSA agencies will be prominently featured Additional information will soon be Priorities fake Center Stage through keynote addresses,informative available at www.anisa-clea,twaterorg Numerous AMSA priorities—infrastruc- panels and roundtable discussions.A and via Byers.Plan now to save the ture funding,wet weather initiatives,and reception in the Gold Room of the dates,May 19-23,2001,and join total maximum daily loads among them Rayburn House Office Building will AMSA in Washington,DC! ■ Board Acts on Regulatory Policy CommiNee, continued from page 1 Also approved was a project to address POT W costs implications of two recent The Board's actions will ensure more the forthcoming results of a federally- Agency's proposals: 1)the proposed informed mlemaking decisions at EPA sponsored survey of radionuclide levels regulations on sanitary sewer overflows and could potentially save billions of Bol- in bicsolids.The Interagency Steering (SSOs);and 2)the proposed metal prod- lars in management,operation,and capi- Comminee on Radiation Standards ucts and machinery effluent guidelines. tol costs for POTWs. (ISCORS),a workgroup of U.S. AMSA's Wet Weather Issues Committee Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), requested,and the Board approved,fund- Summer Conference to Focus on Nuclear Regulatory Commission,and ing to perform a review of EPA's Future of Biosolids Management Department of Energy officials,is plan- cestlbenefit analysis for the proposed To foster a discussion within the AMSA ning to release the results of its 300 SSO rule.It has been estimated that the membership and address implications of POTW survey of radionuclides in proposed rule may cost over$80 billion several key initiatives,AMSA's Board biosolids by July 2001.While the taw for municipalities to implement.AMSA of Directors has approved The Future results of the survey are to be released, plans to comment on the Agency's of Biosotids Management as the theme ISCORS will not be able to complete its cost/benefit estimates for the SSO tale for the 2001 Summer Conference in interpretation of the survey results and based on literal interpretations of the pro- Milwaukee,Wis.Over the past year, draw conclusions at that time.To ensure posed regulatory language. FOTW biosolide management programs that adequate interpretation of ISCORS have come under increased scrutiny and survey results is available when the In addition,AMSA's Pretreatment and evaluation from Congress,EPA,the results are released,the Biosolids Hazardous Waste Committee requested Nuclear Regulatory Commission,the Management Committee,with support of and received funding to perform an National Institute for Occupational TAF funding,plans to complete revision assessment of EPA's costibenefit analysis Safety and Health and the National and finalization of its draft radiological for the proposed metal products and Academy of Science.Research and dose model report to reflect current mod- machinery guidelines.From a prelimi- regulatory initiatives concerning dioxin, eling methodologies developed through nary review,it appears that EPA has radioactivity,pathogens,worker health the ISCORS committee. The dose model grossly overestimated and underesti- and safety,public acceptance,and report is expected in allow AMSA mem- mated the respective benefits and costs, improved science have cast a spotlight bers to evaluate whether levels of respectively,to POTWs in implementing on the entire program and may have mdionuclides in their sludge or ash pose the rule.In order to statistically assess implications on current biosolids dis- a concern for exposed individuals.The the accuracy of EPA's cost/benefit analy- posal and reuse practices.Several of AMSA dose model report is expected in sis and the rate's impact on POTWs and these initiatives will culminate in 2001 be complete in June 2001. industries,AMSA plans to collect addi- and warrant close examination.AMSAs tional dam from the 150 POTWs EPA Summer Conference,July 17-20,2001, POTW Cost Impftcations Explored originally surveyed as pan of the mle's will provide an excellent fonun for the The Board of Directors also took action development. POTW community to do just that.■ on two projects that will assess potential National Creating Nigh Performance AMSA Recognized Business Services Workshop Offered for WIN Efforts, MSA and the Association of Metro- hands-on approach for improving the Nonpoint --�'_e politan Water Agencies(AMWA) efficiency of key departments,such as Publication are pleased to present a dynamic,national procurement.human resources and management workshop,Creating High customer service. Performance Business Services,April MSA has been honored with 30—May 1,in Denver,Colo. The Workshop will be held at the Westin two Honor Roll Awards from Tabor Center in Denver,Colo.,April 30— the American Society of Association The 1 1/2 day Workshop is a must-attend May 1.Watch your mail for registration Executives'(ASAE)Associations for public agency managers working to and program information for the national Advance America Awards Program. improve the performance of their utility's Creating High Performance Business ASAE's awards program honors innova- business services.The Workshop will Services Workshop,or visit AMSA's five projects and programs that exemplify examine the crucial role that business Clean Water on the Web site for infor- the contributions that associations make services play in supporting the core mation,wwwanasa<learrwaterorg. to their industry and the general public. operations of public water and waste- water agencies and builds upon the run- The Workshop will present public agen- ASSMAn= tent of the Thinking, Getting&Staying ties with first-hand experience of the ADVANCE The interactive handbook and workshops. complete customized, n-s that is available �� The interactive curriculum will provide for customized,on-site workshops at agencies with a HIGH your utility! comprehensive, The AMSA-facilitated Water Infmswc- Questions? Contact Lisa DuBois, rare Network(WIN)was presented with CREATING AMSA's Director of Member&Internal an Honor Roll Award for its Clear and PERFORMANCE Services,phone:202/833-3692 or e-mail: Safe Water in the 21st Cemury report that ldubois@amnia-cleanrvaterorg.■ detailed the funding needs for the nation's wastewater and drinking water systems.The publication was recognized as a valuable public outreach tool Legislative Strategy Session designed to increase policymakers'and Provides insight the public's understanding of the need to g increase funding for municipal waste. i MSA members participated in a Congress is"peeled to renew its close water programs.(See related article on 3�=v?Legislative Strategy Session during scrutiny of EPA's final TMDL rule, recent WIN initiatives on page 1.) the 2001 Winter Ca ference to help including an anticipated response to the solidify AMSA's plan of action for the findings of the National Academy of Clean Let's Geer t to Lire Got the Point. 107th Congress.The Strategy Session Sciences(NAS)study and additional Now Let's Crt ro the Nanpoint was also highlighted AMSA's key legislative ini- hearings.Members expressed concern recognized with an Honor Roll Award tiatives on water infrastructure funding over the continued use of the Region IX for its role in communicating one of and U.S.Environmental Protection interim permit guidance and draft AMSA's key priorities to Congress and Agency(EPA)appropriations.Members national interim permitting guidance. for its value in informing the public in attendance reviewed current activities about nonpoint source pollution's role in with the Water Infrastructure Network Several members encouraged AMSA impairing the nation's water quality. (WIN)and key objectives(see related to look for opportunities to improve article on page 1)and considered advo- the Clean Water Act's approach to wet The recognition these initiatives received cacy initiatives,including renewed weather Bows,with a continued empha- by the association community is clear efforts to secure$1.1 million in FY sis on the clarification of the"maximum sign of the prominence and quality of 2002 funding for the National Biosolids extent practicable"standard for the AMSA's initiatives.Both publications Partnership and to fund EPA's new wet stormwater program.AMSA's members are available on AMSA's web site, weather grant programs under the Wet will be kept informed of new develop- www.a a-cleanwarerorg,or by calling Weather Water Quality Act of 2000. ments through Legislative Alerts and the National Office,202/833-2672. Additional priorities that were discussed Updates as the work of the new included owl maximum daily loads Congress begins in earnest.■ (TMDLs)and wet weather issues. 0 AMSA's Special Committees Tackle Priority Issues ' MSA's committees made good use The Committee also discussed progress excellent critique and overview of a. of time set aside during the 2001 on its efforts to perform a voluntary EPA's recently released SSO proposed Winter Conference to discuss a number dioxin survey of POT'Ws to help assess rule.The Legal Affairs Committee will ongoing and new initiatives of impor- current levels and trends of dioxin in be working with the SSO workgroup to tance and interest to the publicly owned biosolids.Over 180 samples have been develop AMSA comments to EPA on treatment works community.Summaries submitted and arc currently being ana- the proposal. of the committee's deliberations are pro- lyzed.A final AMSA report is due out vided in the paragraphs which follow. in May 2001. The Committee held a roundtable on civil and criminal liability for we weather AIR QUALITY COMMITTEE The Committee discussed the status of events and reviewed how wastewater Co-Chair,Ed Torres,Orange County a survey by the Inter-agency Steering agencies can make successful arguments Sanitation District,Calif. Committee on Radiation Standards on the economic feasibility of infrastruc- Co-Chair,Prokawm Tata,Metropolitan (ISCORS)to assess the levels of radionu- ture upgrades in the courts. Water Reclamation District of Greater clides in biosolids,expected to be released Chicago,III. by July 2001.The Committee expressed To conclude the meeting Chair cancems that ISCORS would not be able Christopher Westhoff discussed two AMSA's Air Quality Committee is complete its dose modeling analysis,and new,favorable legal decisions.In Los closely monitoring the U.S.Environ- will not make available any supporting Angeles v. State Water Resources mental Protection Agency(EPA)Office interpretation of survey results.As a result Control Board,BS-060-957(Sup.Ct. of Air and Radiation's effort to gather the Committee recommended that AMSA L.A.County,Nov. 30,2000),a judge health effects and exposure information fund wok in revise and finalize its own found that the regional water board's on hydrogen sulfide(H2S).The commit- draft radiological dose model report to failure to endorse reasonable permit j we discussed EPA's possible timetable reflect current modeling methodologies requirements for L.A.resulted in regula- ! for making a decision on whether m list developed through the ISCORS commit- tion which forced the City to incur enor- the gas as a hazardous air pollutant under tee.(See related article on page 2.) mous costs for additional treatment the Clean Air Act.AMSA's Air Quality processes without any environmental Committee plans to contact the EPA to The Committee also discussed the benefit.In Blanton v.Amelia County. get further information in order to deter- current status of. the National Academy No.000277(Va.Sup.Ct.Jan. 12,2001), mine if the Association should provide of Science's study on the Part 503 regu- the Virginia Supreme Court issued a POTW-specific data to the Agency. lations,National Biosolids Partnership decision that will further the land appli- (see related article this issue),a recently cation of biosolids.The Court found a Reports were received on EPA's exemp- announced exemption of sewage sludge county ordinance banning the use of tion of sewage sludge incinerators from incinerators from final standards under biosolids inconsistent with state law and i the final rule on commercial and indus- Clean Air Act Section 129,and regulations expressly authorizing land trial solid waste incineration units. biosolids-related litigation. application of biosolids conditioned AMSA's data,expertise and necommen- upon a permit. dations played a significant role in the LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE final,favorable,outcome of this rule.The Chair,Christopher Westhoff,City of MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Committee also discussed EPA's National Los Angeles,Deparlmant of Public COMMITTEE y Air Taxies program and the listing of Works,Calif. Co-Chair,Ralph Chadian,Alexandra = chlorine as a restricted use pesticide. Vice Chair,David Kati,Philadelphia Sanitation Audtority,Va. Water Deparinient,Pa. Co-(hair,Brian Crewdson,Anchorage BIOSOUDS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Water&Wastewater Audror'ay,Alaska Co-Chair,Bob Dominak,Nordreast Ohio The Legal Affairs Committee meeting i Regional Sewer District,Ohio on February 1 provided the wastewater The Management and Operations Co-Choir,Roy Kaamey,City of Ins Angeles community with a forum to review a Committee began their first meeting Bureau of Sanitation,Calif. number of curtest legal issues and with a presentation on the AMSA-tad developments and discuss the enhance- asset management initiative,Managing The Biosolids Management Committee ment of AMSA's legal services. fq(ms mcaireAssets to Minimize Cost& ` discussed the status of EPA's round 11 Highlights of the meeting included an Maximize Performance.The Committee amendments to the Part 503 rule limiting update on the status of AMSA's eight also discussed the upcoming national dioxin and dioxin like compounds in active litigations,and a report on the Creating High Performance Business biosolids muse/disposal.The Committee extremely successful AMSA/AMWA Services Workshop,which will be held on teamed that EPA is likely to request an Water& Wastewater Jaw Seminar held April 30—May 1,2001 at the Warm extension from the Court to its current in Phoenix,Ariz.,last November. Tabor Center in Denver,Colo.The , December 15,2001,deadline to promul- Committee encouraged member agencies gate a final rule on dioxins in biosolids. Lisa Hollander of the Northeast Ohio to send key staff members to this impor- (sce February 2001 Regulatory Update). Regional Sewer District provided an tant conference(see related article on AMSA Special Committees Tackle Priority Issues, continued page 4).An update on the Water& Program,AMSA's development of quid- on January 30 to discuss recent develop- Wastewater Leadership Center,which axe for industrial laundries,activities of ments.An unprecedented amount of wet will conduct its first session March 11-23, AMSA's mercury workgroup,and the weather legislative and regulatory activi- 2001 at the Kenan-Flagler Business formation of a new,advisory committee ties,including the recent passage of the School at the University of North looking into uses of Toxics Release Wet Weather Water Quality Act of 2000 Carolina—Chapel Hill(see related 2001 Inventory information. and the pre-release of EPA's sanitary Winter Conference article on page 5). sewer overflow(SSO)proposed rule(see WATER QUALITY COMMITTEE Regulatory Alen RA 01-2),stirred PRETREATMENT AND HAZARDOUS Chair,Norm LeBlanc,Hampton Roads Committee interest. WASTE COMMITTEE Sanitation District,Va. Chair,Guy Aydles,Hampton Roads Vim Chair,Peter RufBer,City of Eugene EPA's Kevin Weiss,one of several pro- Sanitation District,Va. Wastewater Division,Ore. gram staff who worked on the develop- Vice-Chair,Kavin Aiello,Middlesex ment of the proposed SSO regulation, County Utilities Auderity,NJ. EPA's efforts to develop and release gave a brief presentation and update on interim permitting guidance intended to the status of the role.Currently detained The Pretreatment Committee discussed provide guidance to permit writers for for review by the Bush Administration, ongoing development of several effluent developing water quality-based effluent the proposed SSO role establishes regu- guidelines,most notably,new proposed limits prior to the development of a ]story expectations for sewer system guidelines regulating the metal products TMDL received considerable attention. operation and maintenance and provides and machinery sector.The proposed reg- The use of such guidance in Region IX certain limited enforcement discretion for ulation potentially impacts 10,000 facili- was a significant concern for the Water overflow occurrences.Corrunittee mem- ties and proposes standards for nearly Quality Committee.The Committee hers previewed their concerns with the 20 pollutants.EPA estimates that the encouraged better efforts on the part of proposed mle and questioned Weiss on annualized cast of this role is$1.9 bil- EPA to recognize the treatment limitations various assumptions in the rate and pre- lion,and estimates that nationwide of point sources,and to allow flexibility stable.AMSA's SSO Workgroup met POTW administrative costs would be in permitting sources that minimally con- separately on February 1 to outline a between$100,000 to$900,000 per year, tribute to suspected impairments. strategy for engaging EPA on the an estimate the Committee believes is Association's concerns over the proposed severely low.To counter EPA's basis for The Committee also discussed EPA's rate and for submitting comments. the mle,the Committee recommended recommended national nutrient criteria that a review of EPA's cosubenefit analy- for 17 ecoregions across the country. Weiss'presence also gave the Committee sis be undertaken and a follow-up survey The Committee expressed concern that the unique opportunity to provide feed- be conducted to scientifically detemtine the criteria will have major impact on back on the Administration's January 19 realistic costs and burdens to PO'rWs. POTWs across the nation.The Committee draft policy on we[weather blending(see The Committce also recommended that expressed support for continuing to urge Regulaory Alen RA 0I-3).AMSA staff AMSA seek a 90-day extension to the EPA to modify its approach in the devel- also presented preliminary results from public comment period of the rule. opment of nutrient criteria and for EPA its national blending survey.Of roughly to redefine these criteria as"action trig- 40 percent of the membership that The Committee received a status report gers"for further watetbody-specific study. responded to the survey,about half indi- on EPA's Pretreatment Strearrdining pro- cated that their systems are designed to posed role.It was reported that EPA has The committee also received updates on blend peak wet weather flows. recommitted staff to finalize the Agency's the status of EPA's consolidated assess- July 1999 proposal and have set a goal ment and listing methodology(CALM) In the area of combined sewer overflows of June 2001 for presenting the final rule guidance,methyltaercury criteria devel- (CSOs),the Committee was provided an to the Administrator for signature.In opment,the National Water Quality overview of EPA's recent draft guidance addition to 13 topic areas covered by the Monitoring Council,and recent research on the coordination of state water quality proposed streamlining mic,EPA also studies concerning the presence or standards with long-term control plans. indicated that the issue of significant absence of endocrine dismptoring The meeting concluded with a brief noncompliance(SNC)may also be chemicals in POTW effluents. overview of two critical lawsuits involy- addressed in a final rule.The refinement ing municipal sWnnwater management of the SNC definition was one ofAMSA's WET WEATHER ISSUES COMMITTEE permits.Both cases(EanhJustice Legal top priority issues for streamlining in a Chair,James Murray,Wayne County Defense Fund v EPA and 74alarm "while paper"submitted by AMSA and Department of Environment,Mich. Riverkeepers a Browner)involve ehal- the Water Environment Federation an the Yee Choir,David Williams,East Bay lenges to existing municipal permits by proposed rule in November 1999. Municipal Utility District,Calif. environmental groups over the lack of numeric pollutant[limits. The Committee also discussed the status A packed house was on hand at the of the Metal Finishing Sustegic Opals Wet Weather Issues Committee meeting AMSA 2001 Winter Conference Examines Utility Infrastructure, Launches Biosolids EMS Program j wring AhlSAs 3W1 Water tacting their meta- ` ' National v Conference,Jan.30—Feb.2 in bars of Congress San Diego,Calif.,participants examined and encouraging Bioso1ids m ways to manage utility infrastructure. their suppon. improve leadership skills,and lea �.._ partnership about the new National Biosolids Conference atten- partnership's(NBP) Environmental dees then enjoyed a Management System IEMSI program. diverse panel discus- sion on asset management,which pro- use of"visionstories:'which wl the Managing and Funding Infrastructure vided an in-depth look at Australia's message in the form of a story to com- Needs Receive Attention successful asset management efforts municate the message's impact on the Critical conference issues were framed and insight on the changes to financial audience's needs and their future.(Mark in a joint keynote address, Water 21 — accounting and repotting standards Walton is a member of the faculty for the Funding the Futurr of our Underground issues by the Governmental Accounting joint-venture Water& Wastewater Infmstnrennr.Attendees heard from Standards Board(GASB)for state and Leadership Center.) Doug MacDonald,Executive Director of local governments(known as GASB 34). Massachusetts Water Resources Panelists also learned more about Following Walton's keynote,Donnie Authority, who provided a local perspec- AMSA's project.Managing hImstmc- Wheeler,General Manager of Hampton tive on wastewater funding needs and the lure Assets to Mhumize Cost& Maximize Roads Sanitation District.and Doug importance of continued federal support Performance. MacDonald,Executive Director of for water and wastewater infmsuucture. Massachusetts Water Resources MacDonald explained that the infrastruc- Improving Leadership Authority,led a discussion on the new ture funding gap,as outlined in the Water Communication—The Water& Water& Wastewater Leadership Center, Infrastructure Network's(WIN)report Wastewater Leadership Center which will present its first session March (see related article on page 1),is so Leadership communications expert 11-23.Wheeler discussed the breadth of broad because the"high-jump bar of Mark Walton provided a keynote address the Center's curriculum and the impor- regulatory standards seems to be raised that explored strategies that work to cre- tance of participation to develop tomor- every time we look down the runway." ate"buy-in"in daily communications—a raw's leaders in the wastewater treatment Boston,Mass.,and the Deer Island concept that is emcial to today's leaders. industry. He urged agencies to place Treatment Facility,were presented as the Walton stressed the need to develop a heavy emphasis on the education and perfect example for the need for federal communications strategy that effectively training of employees—especially people funding for wastewater infrastructure. presents your message to your target that will be at the"helm'of the organiza- According to MacDonald,the Deer audience. His approach implemented the tion in the future.Wheeler examined the Island project,which provides secondary importance of ongoing leadership training wastewater treatment for the citizens of and the need for agency's to Boston,would not have progressed as have a"succession plan:"'I quickly without federal funds.Although am looking at an significant local sewer rates have risen due to this (education and development] massive capital project,the increase is investment at HRSD;'smted not as dramatic as it would have been ♦conWaed or pcye€ had the Deer Island project not received federal money.MacDonald stated that ..a clean Boston Harbor and functioning sewer system have turned out to be a big winner with the public:' AMSA's Executive Director. Ken Kirk. p followed MacDonald's presentation -. with details on the latest efforts at the national level to increase infrastructure funding. including the most recent efforts of WIN. Member agencies wereurged to to participate in the effort by con- © AMSA 2001 Winter Conference, confinued From page 5 meeting mandatory regulatory require- P 9 menu and address environmental and quality of life concerns that the public is ' Wheeler,"an important pan of which is concerned about:' the Leadership Center-For more infor- mation on the Leadership Center,contact oweourThere are 27"charter'public agencies, Lisa DuBois,AMSA's Director of agencies and customers including 19 AMSA members agencies. Member&Internal Services,phone: ive the extra effort participating in the NBP demonstration 2021833-3692 or e-mail: Iduboh@ to 9program to pilot test the EMS Bhrep?art antsa-cleamvarerorg. and dedications tobefore it is presented as a model for the the cause of new wastewater profession next year. NBP Launches EMS Program at infrastructure funding AMSA Winter conference AMSA member Blake Anderson, The National Biosolids Partnership General Manager for Orange County (NBP)launched its biosolids EMS pro- DougMacDonald, Executive Director, Sanitation District.Calif„presented an gram on the final day of AMSA's linter overview of the EMS Blueprint.Anderson Conference.The session featured per- listed these benefits of the EMS program: spectives from charter demonstration doing the right thing;getting a better communities and presentations that intro- quality biosolids products;gaining public duced the EMS Blueprint materials, support for a biosolids program:bringing including the Code of Good Practice, "Programs such as the EMS are tools credibility to public agencies;avoiding EMS Common Elements,Guidance that will allow AMSA members to costly mistakes;and saving public agen. Manual for EMS Elements, the National remain competitive,efficient,and envi- ties money. Marina/of Good Practice,and 3rd Party ronmentally friendly."said NBP Chair Verification Recommendations.The and District Manager of the Metro conference Audio Tapes Available NBP,an alliance of AMSA,the Water Wastewater Reclamation District in Audiotapes of the conference sessions Environment Federation and EPA,was Denver.Colo., Bob Hite."In essence, (with the exception of Mark Walton's formed in 1997 to advance environnim- we are encouraging,through this EMS keynote address)are available for pur- mlly safe.sound,and sustainable biosolids program,the wastewater profession to chase at www.ain.va-cleattwaterorg in management practices that build public implement best management practices the Meetings&Conferences section.■ acceptance in local communities. that 'raise the bar'he going heyund AMSA National Office Staff - Growing and Changing to Serve Members MSA is pleased to announce sev- excited about serving AMSA in these for the organization on numerous cut- eral new developments regarding new capacities,and the Association is ting-edge litigations and settlements. its National Office Staff. Lisa DuBois pleased to recognize their high level of Alexandra also previously practiced began the new year in the newly-created performance with these promotions. environmental law with the law firth of position of Director. Member& Internal Winston&Strawn. She received her Services.Lisa previously served the With internal promotions made,the J.D.rnagna curry laude in 1994 from the Association as its Manager, Marketing work of identifying exceptional candi- Columbus School of Law,Catholic &Membership Development and will dates to fill vacancies on the National University of America,in Washington, now direct the Member& Internal Office staff has been ongoing.The DC,where she was Editor-in-Chief of Services Group.AMSA's Government Association is pleased to be in the posi- the law Review.She is an active mem- Affairs Assistant,Robin Davis,has been lion to announce several new members ber of the American Bar Association's promoted to the new staff position of of the AMSA team. corporate counsel and environment earn- Regulatory Analyst,and will continue to mlttees,and the Maryland and District of work with the Government Affairs Group Alexandra Dapolito Dunn has joined Columbia bar associations. in achieving AMSA's advocacy goals and AMSNs National Office as the objectives.lastly.AMSA's Secretary/ Association's first General Counsel. Anne-Marie Corkran joins the National Receptionist,Shawnim Dickens,has Alexandmjoins AMSA after more than Office staff as the new Manager of moved up in the organization to the posi- four years as an environmental attorney Marketing&Membership Development. tion of Member&Internal Services at the U.S.chemical industry's trade Anne-Marie comes to AMSA from the Assistant.All of these individuals are association,where she was lead counsel ♦ cnminued c,• acne e 0 Alf rough Congress'vision of zero Counsel,Alexandra Dap rliro Dunn, in municipal sumnwater pemdts in wafer]pollution remains unfulfilled, its will both enhance and expand AMSA's Oregon and District of Columbia taus. punuif as u uestionably rearded the legal services to the membership. Summaries of AMSA's taus and key des6vcfion one aquaffc environment." briefing documents are available for the membership on Member Pipeline's Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook G Litigation Tracking section, County(SWANCC) a U.S.Army Corps www.aynsa-cleanwmerorg. of Engineers, U.S.Supreme Court, AL No. 99•1178(January 9,2001) PERSPECTIVES AMSA areand ahead strives to keep members (Stevens,J.,dissenting). aware and ahead of new legal errsdevelop. vi ments through timely Legal Alerts advis- ing members of new cases.AMSA's Legal decisions at all levels of our Legal Affairs Committee offers an excel. judicial system continue to signify- AMSA's diverse litigation portfolio is lent opportunity to network with Items cantly impact our nation's clean evidence of the organisation's present and share information on late-breaking water policy.lust last month,a divided effectiveness shaping water policy developments and vends.Further,this U.S.Supreme Court held that the Army through the courts.On total maximum year's Water and Wastewater few Corps of Engineers'assertion of juris. daily loads(TMDL)issues, in the Ninth Seminar will be held November 14-16. diction over intrastate seasonal ponds Circuit AMSA is striving to preserve the 2001 in Savannah,Ga.The Seminar pro- under the"migratory bird rule"exceeded favorable California District Court deci- vides another forum for members to the Corps'authority under the Clean sion in Pronsolino a Marcus,which held expand their knowledge and focus on Water Act(CWA). that nonpoint source only impaired waters critical new legal issues. should be subject to TMDLs.AMSA also The 5-4 decision is the latest evidence is an intervenor in the D.C.Circuit litiga- Following on the successful May 2000 of the difference of opinion on the tion over the July 2000 TMDL regulation, publication Evaluating TMDLs... CWA's intended purposes and how to supporting some elements of the cones. Protecting the Rights of POTWs.AMSA best continue improving water quality for versial rule and challenging others.In will be developing new legal white all Americans.We can be certain that friend of the court amicus briefs,AMSA papers and research tools for the mem- SWANCC will not be the last water case recently demonstrated to the Fourth bership.Finally,AMSA also will include to reach the nation's highest Court given Circuit the importance of the CWA's this Legal Perspectives column in Clear, the many remaining controversial and permit shield,and highlighted for an Water Nnvs to provide enhanced discus unclear CWA legal issues.And,the next Alabama federal coon the significance of sion of current legal topics. case that progresses as far as S WANCC protecting the integrity of existing NPDES might affect POTWs more dramatically. permit conditions for PO7WVs.AMSA AMSA looks forward to providing also is a parry to an Oregon federal case enhanced legal services in the coming AMSA is,and will continue to be,a pan overseeing the revision of EPKs standards months and years.Feel free to contact of key legal cases affecting the Associa- for dioxin in sewage sludge.Future AMSA's new General Counsel directly Lions members around the country.The AMSA litigations will address other key al ndunn@amsn-rleamvmer:org or at recent addition of in-house General wastewater issues,such as numeric limits 2021533-1803.■ AMSA Welcomes Three New Public Agency Members AMSA would like to welcome its The City of Modesto,which serves with a"buy one,get one free"meeting newest members to the Associatfpn. 220.000 people has also joined the Asso- registration for use at any AMSA can. ciation this month.Their representative is ference.By helping AMSA increase its The City of Santa Cruz Water Pollution Robert Howard,WQC Superintendent. membership,every member agency ben. Control Facility,which serves 125,000 efits through increased representation people has selected Dan Seidel,WPCF on Capitol Hill as well as with the U.S. Operations Manager as their AMSAamm Environmental Protection Agency,the representative. .rc nation's publicly owned treatment works. Will Haapala,Wastewater/Geothermal it?'�y "- Please contact Anne-Mane Corkran, Superintendent(formally of Little Blue AMSA's Manager,Marketing and Valley Sewer District)will be represent- Member agencies are encouraged to Membership Development,for informs- ing the City of Klamath Falls Oregon participate in AMSA's membership devel• tion about helping AMSA expand its Department of Public Works which opment program.All member agencies membership.Please call 202/533-1802 or serves 27,000 people. that sponsor a new member are rewarded email at acorkrarr®amsa-cfeanwaterorg. 0 Staff, continued from page 6 E-Alerts - Popular Communication Choice National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, tuuid-January 200 I,AAJSA began communicating with members via E-Alerti, where she served as their Marketing new tool that provides instant notification of new AMSA correspondence on the Manager. She received her B.A. from Association's web site.&Alerts allow the Association, its Members and Affiliates to the State University of New York at take full advantage of Brockport.Anne-Marie's experience AMSA's web site and with associations,coupled with her e-mail capabilities. knowledge of marketing and member- ship make her an excellent addition to Members selecting the .. the AMSA team. E-Alen option receive on the web Updates and Alerts via Jennifer Burke recently joined the AMSA e-mail,along with a link to staff as the new Government Affairs the information on AMSA's Assistant.Jennifer is a recent graduate of web site.The Clean Water News,and other AMSA American University,where she majored print publications,will continue to be sent to the in law and Society.Jennifer's energy and membership via regular mail. enthusiasm make her the perfect choice for this fast-paced position. This new member service is already the preferred means of communication for over 40%of the Association's members.AMSA is pleased to offer this new member AMSA is pleased to welcome these new service free-of charge,and members are encouraged to sign up to receive E-Alerts additions to the National Office staff. ■ by visiting rvww.amsa-clearnraterorg/p-ivaie/sigrutp.Ann.■ amsa Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies 1816 Jefferson Place, NW Washington, DC 20036-2505 202/833-AMSA • 202/833-4657 tax bttp.11www.amsa-deanwater.org AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING MARCH 28, 2001 Immediately following the 6:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District Meeting In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, V any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 03/28/01 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on February 28, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/01 02/28/01 Totals $4,544,849.75 $3,910,431.80 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance,there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 28, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 28, 2001 to be filed. 03/28/01 Page 3 C. Reaffirm the Charter of the FAHR Committee with regard to Labor Negotiations. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re March 7, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 7, 2001 to be filed. C. (1) Authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to award a sole source purchase order to Taylor-Dunn, Inc. for Purchase of 17 Electric Carts, Specification No. V-015, for a total amount not to exceed $124,200.00 including sales tax; and (2)Authorize the District to recognize Taylor-Dunn, Inc. as the District's standard and sole manufacturer for future electric cart purchases without further Board approval. d. Authorize staff to enter into negotiations with Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR)to produce Class A biosolids product(s) and to acquire from ICOR an interest in their production facility. e. Authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award a contract for the Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite, Specification No. C-148, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $400,000. f. (1)Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-01)for an increase in unit cost from$265.00 per ton to$462.00 per ton, increasing the total amount not to exceed $756,300; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000101-01)for an increase in unit cost from$462.00 per ton to $515.00 per ton, effective April 1, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $850,000, if needed; and (3) authorize staff to solicit bids for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. C-150. g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-07, Establishing Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 00-22, incorporating amendments to the indemnification language. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re March 1, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 1, 2001 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$6,134 and a time extension of 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,309,535; and (2)Accept Modifications to Electrical 03/28/01 Page 4 and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1, with Southern Contracting ` Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$114,973.75 and a time extension of 18 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$8,786,334.56 e. Establish a budget for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, in the amount of$445,000, to be reimbursed by the Design Consultant. f. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with Carollo Engineers for the design of the Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, subject to approval by the Board of Directors at the May 23, 2001 meeting. g. (1) Establish a budget for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No.J-40-5, for$147,830; and (2) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5,for a total amount not to exceed $77,830. h. (1)Authorize transfer of all funds from the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. SP-04, to Scrubber Monitor and Control Project , Job No. J-71-7; (2) Approve a budget amendment of$1,586,000 for the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, for a total project budget of$2,382,000; and (3) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc., to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7,for an amount not to exceed $359,951. I. Establish a budget of$90,000 for Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station, Contract No. 7-14-4. j. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No.11-22, providing for a change in the name of the Consultant to Tetra Tech ASL, and providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,679,for a total amount not to exceed $282,479. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the March 14, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 14, 2001 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2001. 03/28/01 y Page 5 d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-08, approving substitution of the Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Lloyds TSB Bank PLC for the existing Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Barclays Bank PLC. 15. Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Section 3.07, to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 26925 issued to Mladen Buntich Construction Company for Emergency Repair to 24-inch Coast Highway Force Main at the Inlet Structure east of the Santa Ana River, for an additional amount of$110,000, for a total amount not to exceed $200,000. 16. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on February 22 and March 1, 2001 to be filed. 17. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000002012 (Government Code Section 54956.9) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Adjournment 03/28/O1 Page 6 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411. ext. 7130 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2001 oJNty SANfTgr�oy c 9 ¢ c, O --1 A � h FcI�N TG NE EN�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 4 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 'L 02/28/01 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on February 28, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green,Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley A Beth Krom Mike Ward X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Peer Swan Darryl Miller Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Paula Zeller; Chuck Winsor; Doug Stewart;William Cassidy; Ryal Wheeler, Dean Karels OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel; Alternate Director Arlene Schafer; Alternate Director Alberta Christy; Don Hughes;Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Michelle Tuchman; Don Schulz; Mr. & Mrs. D. Chavez; Ken Erbeznik;Terry Lane; Mike Forquer; Chuck Goodwin;Tony Henrich; Lynn Osborn; Irwin Haydock; Rick Borden; Mike Collins; Saeid Dastmalchi; Larry Porter Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 r 02/28/01 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: (`Mayor) City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Orange Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz Santa Ana Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Mike Forquer of Yorba Linda addressed the Directors regarding the path of the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)line that would cross his property and several of his neighbors. He expressed concern over negative impact on their properties and asked the Directors to consider alternative paths for the line replacement. Mr. Ken Erbeznik of Yorba Linda also spoke to Directors regarding the path of the SARI line and requested the Directors to consider alternate placements that would not Impact his property. He also requested that he and those Yorba Linda residents who might be impacted by this line be kept informed of all Items related to this project to be presented to the Board of Directors. Ms. Eileen Murphy of Huntington Beach urged the Directors not to request a waiver for secondary treatment to the ocean outfall. Don Schulz, a 40-year resident of Orange County, spoke against the District requesting a 301(h) waiver, and urged the Directors to reconsider going to full primary treatment of all wastewater going through the District's ocean outfall. Mr. Jan Vandersloot of Newport Beach spoke to the Directors and urged the Directors not to request a 301(h)waiver for secondary treatment to the ocean outfall in the year 2002. Larry Porter of Newport Beach spoke to the Directors and requested they not request a 301(h) waiver for secondary treatment to the ocean outfall. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file correspondence dated February 25, 2001 from Carl W. and Marsha H. Schreiber opposing the proposed SARI line location; and, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file correspondence dated February 27, 2001 from Thomas J. Stamatis opposing the proposed SARI line location. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Ectcenrode reported the go-no go decision on the groundwater replenishment system cooperative project (GWRS)with the Orange County Water District will be presented at the March 2& board meeting. He reminded the Directors this joint meeting would begin at 6:30 p.m. The Directors were also reminded that a workshop on the GWRS would be held on Saturday, March V at the Orange County Water District facility, and encouraged all to attend this workshop. 0 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 r 02/28/01 It was announced that the OMITS and PDC Committees would be dark in the month of July but not for the month of August. A 20-year service award was then presented to employee Dean Karats. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson assured the Board that staff would maintain transparency of the District's operations with concerned citizens regarding the Santa Ana River Interceptor and the District's 301(h)waiver. Regular meetings are being held with concerned citizens primarily from Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, as well as from other communities, with regard to wastewater management. Mr. Anderson then reported during the last storms the flows peaked by an additional 100 million gallons per day. These increased flows were handled effectively and without any interruption to service. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L.Woodruff referred the Directors to two memoranda included in their meeting folders that evening. The memorandum regarding a waiver of conflict of interest would require action by the Board and would need to be added as Item 18 in accordance with Government Code 54954.2(b)(2). APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 2001 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 1/9 15/01 01/31/01 Totals $3,400,711.30 $11,236.329.16 Director Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 32647. CONSENTCALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Negligence, Nuisance, and Waste, Michael Rezvan, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al.,Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 NL10525, in connection with Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and refer to District's contractor, Barnard Construction Company, Inc., St. Paul Insurance Companies, and General Counsel, to appear and defend the interests of the District. 0 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 r 02/28/01 b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Michael Hushes requesting annexation of 1.12 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District at the Intersection of Amapola Avenue and Ranch Wood Trail in the City of Orange; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-05, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-19—Hughes Annexation). C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To amend the motion to(1)Approve the purchase of real property located at 810 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, California at an amount not to exceed $540,000, plus miscellaneous title and escrow fees;and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$600.000 for Rehabilitation of the"A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, for a total project budget of$2,848,000. d. This Item was removed from the agenda. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the February 28, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2001 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the February 7, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Authorize a total budget for an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for consulting service agreements for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; 2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts with government agencies, universities and consulting companies qualified to carry out those contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; 3)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with the United States Geological Survey(USGS)to conduct all tasks associated with the design, installation, and collection of physical oceanographic data from fixed oceanographic moorings in an amount not to exceed $500,000; and 4) Direct staff to request County of Orange to assist In the funding of the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100745Issued to BP Energy Company for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28, ending July 31, 2001, providing for an increase of $1,680,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,810,000. 0 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 y 02/28/01 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Establish a budget of$480,000 for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297); 2)Adopt Resolution No. 01-06, authorizing specifications calling for a speck make and model of equipment in order that a field test may be conducted to determine the product's suitability for future use as authorized by California Public Contract Code Section 3400(b);and 3)Authorize the Purchasing Manager to negotiate and enter Into a sole source contract with US Filter Envirex for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297), for an amount not to exceed $360,000. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the February 1, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 1, 2001 to be filed, as corrected. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No.7 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J. K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-39, with Margate Construction,authorizing an addition of$221,581 and 30 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,549,632. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Plant No. 2,Job No. SP2000.20, as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. to conduct a Value Engineering workshop and prepare a Value Engineering study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection. Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed$57,759. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:.(1)Approve a budget amendment of $222,500 for HVAC Equipment Replacement of Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No.J-80, for a total project budget of$1,124,500; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc. for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80,for an amount not to exceed $897,339. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish a budget of$354,815 for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J- 25-¢; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25-6, for an amount not to exceed $294,815. , Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 u 02/28/01 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design engineering services for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6- 13,for an additional amount of$54,652, increasing the total amount not to exceed $112,237. I. . This Item was removed from the agenda. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the February 14, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 14, 2001 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2001. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 2000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Queried Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve the Five- Year Staffing and Business Plan,fiscal year 2000-01 to 2004-05, as approved unanimously by the OMTS and PDC Committees. Director Peer Swan opposed. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on January 29, 2001. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 29, 2001 to be filed. 16. There was no closed session. 17. No action Minutes for Board Meeting o Page 8 02/28/01 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize adding Item No. 18 to the agenda to consider approving a waiver of conflict of interest. The need for action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and, FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Waiver of Conflict of Interest be, and is hereby, approved with regard to Rutan &Tucker, Special Counsel to the District in the matter of Crow Winthrop Development, LP vs. Orange County Sanitation District to allow the firm to represent the City of Anaheim in regard to a publics work project for which the City is seeking reimbursement from the District. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. 4w Secretary of oard of D' clors of Orange Coun Sanitation strict G:wp.dtMagendMBoard Minutes\2001 Board Minutes\022801.dm Claims Paid From 01101/01 to 01116/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 32638 Blue Cross of California $ 183.681.39 Medical Insurance Premium 32639 Brown&Caldwell 341,038A7 Engineering Services-2-41 32640 Arnow Energy Trading Corporation 165,112.94 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28 32641 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 64,897.82 Computers-(1)2400 Class-Service,(1)6450-Class Server&(2)Chassis 32642 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 98,083.48 Fernic Chloride MO 9.27-95 32643 Orange County Water District 44,556.80 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 32644 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 77,354.74 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 32645 Southern California Edison 50,731.31 Power 32646 Tule Ranch/Magen Fans 122,356.22 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 32647 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 100,214.55 Construction 3-38-1 32648 Accurate Measurement Systems 1,037.68 Electrical Parts If Supplies 32649 Accutite Fasteners, Inc. 34.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32650 Air Products&Chemicals 6.60 Lob Supplies 32651 Airborne Express 32.50 Air Freight 32652 Airgas Safely 1.262.18 Safety Supplies 32653 Stephen Ambuel 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32654 American Airlines 2.400.50 Travel Services 32655 Arcua Data Security 204.00 Ofrsits Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 32656 Artistic Blinds 75.00 Mini Blinds&Installation 32657 Asbury Environmental Services 150.00 Waste Oil Removal y. 32658 Azur Environmental 855.35 Lab Supplies rT 32659 ARKTechnologies 5,780.00 County System Programming 'l+ 32660 ASR Analysis 360.00 Vibration Analysis @ Bitter Point Pump Station :• 32661 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 32.11 Telephone Service 32662 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,040.43 Long Distance Telephone Service 32663 Jesse Baker 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32664 Biolherleux Vltek, Inc. 517.83 Lab Supplies 32665 Bolas Radiator Service- 72.19 Auto Parts&Supplies 32666 Donald Brown 630.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32667 Joseph Burke(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32668 Calif Centrifugal Pump 110.00 Pump Maintenance If Repairs 32669 Cameron Welding Supply 73.39 Welding Equipment&Supplies 32670 J.C.Campbell,III 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32671 Carl R.Nelson,P.E. 2.050.00 Engineering Consultant 241 32672 Camillo Engineers 7,678.50 Professional Services-J-66,[MANS Process Testing 32673 Freddie Carpenter 545.98 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32674 Rita Chadesworth 382.41 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32875 Compressor Components of California 780.00 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 32676 Voided Check - - 32677 Cooper Energy Services 350A4 Engine Supplies 32678 Robert Cooper 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32679 Boyd Copenhaver 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32680 Corporate Express Imaging 177.79 Computer Supplies 32681 Corporate Express 512.59 Office Supplies 32682 Donald Corrigan 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 01101/01 to 01115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32683 County Wholesale Electric Co. 232.42 Electrical Pans&Supplies 32684 Crane America Services,Inc. 660.00 Crane Services 32685 J.L.Griner 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32606 Charles Cummings 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32687 CASA 275.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 32688 CR&R,Inc. 1.575.00 Container Rentals 32689 CWEA-TCP 50.00 Membership 32690 William Daniel 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32691 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Siosolids Analysis 32692 The Dickson Company 374.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 32693 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 135.94 Paint Supplies 32694 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 394.23 Electrical Supplies 32685 Richard Elliott 830.38 Recenciiation User Fee Program 32696 Enchanter,Inc. 2.400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 32697 ENS Resources, Inc. 8,108.47 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 32698 FedEx Corpomflon 26.14 Air Freight 32699 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 118.05 Lab Supplies 32700 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 246.00 Concrete Cutting 32701 Fleet Pride 5,555.83 Smoke Opacity Meter&Supplies-Auto Shop 32702 Fomen Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 2,316.00 Engineering Services P-183 32703 Fountain Valley Camera 35.66 Photo Supplies 32704 Franklin Covey 260.38 Office Supplies 32705 Fry's Electronics 54.89 Computer Supplies 32706 Ganahl Lumber Company 359.86 Lumber/Hardware 32707 Garratt-Callahan Company 1,440.08 Chemicals ^t 32708 Michael Foulds 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32709 Getinge Castle 220.20 Lab Supplies 32710 Gier ich-Mitchell,Inc. 16,969.58 Bell Filter Press Supplies 32711 Harland Glllbank 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32712 Claire Glovak 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32713 Golden Bell Products 7,194.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes 32714 W W Grainger, Inc. 1.880.46 Electrical Pads&Supplies 32715 Sally Grove-Lopez 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32716 Verizon California 836.01 Telephone Services 32717 H. R.Macklin&Sans, Inc. 725.00 Professional Service-Land Appraisal 32718 Haaker Equipment Company 182.16 Truck Supplies 32719 Hach Company 891.83 Lab Supplies 32720 Robert Hahn 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32721 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 32722 Ernest Harvey 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32723 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 3,667.07 Engine Generator Control Supplies 32724 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 205.60 Meeting Expenses 32725 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 50.21 Compressor Pads 32726 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium 32727 Hub Auto Supply 61.59 Truck Pans 32728 City of Huntington Beach 13,330.97 Water Use Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 01101101 to 01116/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32729 Huntington Park Rubber Stamp Co. 149.56 Stationery 8 Office Supplies 32730 HR Solutions,Inc. 141.69 Human Resources Participation Survey 32731 Industrial Disldbutl n Group 212,05 Janitorial Supplies 32732 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 268.43 Lab Supplies 32733 Jay's Catering 1,158.78 Meeting Expenses 32734 Johnstone Supply 257.48 Electrical Supplies 32735 Joseph Jordan 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32736 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 5,250.00 FIS Support Services 32737 Claude Keslenholz 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32738 Katherine Kuester(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32739 Richard Kaye 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32740 Jack Kent 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32741 Kings Fertilizer Corporation 16.567.20 Sulfuric Acid 32742 Herbert Krause 6,828.02 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32743 La Molts Chemical Products 105.72 Chemicals 32744 Lexis-Nexis 68.62 Books 8 Publications 32745 John Lister 8 Tise Aley 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32746 John Marks 830.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32747 Marjory Marks 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32748 Robert Martinet 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program $' 32749 MarVac Electronics 19.38 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 32750 Gary Maxwell 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program r, 32751 Timothy Mayeda 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32752 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 487.27 Plumbing Supplies 8 Tools w32753 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 3,150.33 Calibrate/Repair(5)Meters 32754 Thomas Metz 287.73 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32755 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4.971.87 Elbow Pump Assembly 32756 Mission Uniform Service 3,476.07 Uniform Rentals 32767 Mobile Mini, Inc. - 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 32755 Vincent Moreno 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32759 Mine Safety Appliance Co. 552.14 Instrument Maint. Services 32760 Marcus Nay 483.46 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32761 John Newham 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32762 City of Newport Beach 57.67 Water Use 32763 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 733.07 Lubdcant/Diesel Fuel 32764 Ninyo 5 Moore Corporate Accounting 304.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 32765 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.184.09 Office Supplies 32766 Olivia Chan Consultants, Inc. 22,538.29 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 32767 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 139.40 Electrical Pads&Supplies 32768 Orange County Business Council 70.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 32759 Orange County Hose Company 165.21 Hydraulic Hose,Supplies 8 Repairs 32770 Orange County Treasurers Conference 119.00 Finance Meeting Registration 32771 Thomas Otis 988.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32772 Oxygen Service Company 45.08 Specialty Gases 32773 OCB Reprographics 6,888.79 Printing Service-MO 126100 32774 Pacific Bell 16.08 Telephone Services Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32775 Padfic Mechanical Supply 175.63 Plumbing Supplies 32776 Thomas Fallen 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32777 Parker Supply Company 3,187.10 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 32778 Parkhouse Tire Co. 869.91 Tires 32779 Parts Unlimited 253.62 Truck Supplies 32780 Ramon Peterson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32781 Portion Industries 2,596.18 Lab Supplies 32782 Primavera Systems, Inc. 961.00 Publications 32783 Pmpipe 800.00 CCTV Sewedine Inspection 32784 Dennis Proud 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32785 PCS Express 70.20 Courier Service 32786 008, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 32787 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 171.03 Instrument Repairs 32788 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 32789 Restek Corp 312.6E Lab Pens&Supplies 32790 Nancy Rival 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32791 Robert W Johnson(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32792 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 6,990.00 Engineering Services-Additions to Fleet Services&Rebuild Shop 32793 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1,714.87 Specially Gases 32794 Steven Severance 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32795 Richard Shinto 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32796 Shortridge Instruments,Inc. 3,242.94 Instrument Supplies 32797 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 373.78 Tools/Hardware 32798 Aldrich Chemical Co. 1,223.75 Lab Supplies 32799 Skater,Inc. 220.75 Lab Supplies 32000 SoftChoice 27.87 Software 32801 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 250.00 Professional Services-Calibration of Ocean Oulfall Meter 32802 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. 351.85 Janitorial Supplies 32803 SludioVisia 450.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint. 32SD4 Summit Steel 549.55 Steel 32805 Sunset Ford 91.98 Vehicle Supplies 32806 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,299.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32807 Super Power Products 775.60 Janitorial Supplies 32808 William P.Swift(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32809 SPEC Services,Inc. 4,008.91 Engineering Services J-33-1 32810 Mallory Thayer 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32811 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 379.75 Mechanical Supplies 32812 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 300.96 Locks&Keys 32813 Top Hal Productions 398.41 Catering Services 32814 The Unisource Corporation 7,449.03 Paper&ONce Supplies 32815 United Parcel Service 20.50 Parcel Services 32816 United States Postal Service 97.00 P.O. Box Fee 32817 Valley Cities Supply Company 170.67 Plumbing Supplies 32818 Richard Ventura 45.89 Reconci lotion User Fee Program 32819 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 537.55 Lab Supplies 328M The Wackenhut Corporation 864.00 Security Guards Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01115101 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32821 Steven Welfare 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32822 Timothy Wren 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32823 Xerox Corporation 10.030.85 Copier Leases 32824 The Yakima Company 19.797.38 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 32825 Yardley Instruments 3,410,35 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32826 Union Bank of California 5,274.46 Construction 3438-1, Retention 32827 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 1,too.89 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 32028 Ken A.Sekamoto 823.37 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 32529 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,905.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 32830 Orange County Sanitation District 1,229.35 Petty Cash Reimb. 32831 Barclays Bank PLC 84,008.19 COP Letter of Credit Quarterly Fee 32832 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28.397.88 Medical Insurance Premium 32833 Network Catalyst,Inc. 68.548.16 Computer Maintenance 32834 Orange County Sanitation District 435,285.76 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 32835 So.Cal.Gas Company 31,203.56 Natural Gas 32836 Christopher Muff 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32837 A-Plus Systems 4,365.00 Notices&Ads 32838 Alrgas Safety 270.53 Safety Supplies 32839 Allan Alevy 748.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32840 Valentin Alvarado 155.26 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32841 Aquent, INC. 3.650.00 Temporary Employment Services 32842 Association of Calif.Water Agencies 90.00 Publication rat 32843 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 14.76 Telephone Service q 32844 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,918.61 Cellular Telephone Service to 32845 Jesse Baker 158.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32846 Lawrence Baker 143.71 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32847 Joseph Ballard 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32848 Bank of America(Trust Fund) 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32849 Kenneth Barton - 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32850 Lowell Beezley 830.35 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32851 Ball Pipe&Supply Co. 249.45 Piping Supplies 32852 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 32853 Robert Bosley 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32854 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 32855 David Buck 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32856 Mark Buslamante 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32857 Laurance Buller 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32858 J.A.BUBacavcll 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32859 Carl Women&Co. 299.79 Insurance Claims Administrator 32860 Michael Gaseley 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32861 Kenny Chang&JoAnne Nichols 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32862 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 32863 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4,763.95 Electrical Supplies 32864 Sandra Cook 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32865 William Craig 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32866 James Craig 303.59 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32867 Robert Cummings 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32868 CASA 18.150.00 Membership Does 32869 CASA 1.425.00 Admin.8 Board Meeting Registration 32870 Joyce Dale 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32871 Steven Davey 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32872 Philip De Marco 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32873 Victor De Wilt 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32874 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 7,010.22 Computers(1) 32875 John Doyle 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32576 Richard Dreude 45.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32877 Kurt Dulka 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32878 Ecco Equipment Corporation 3,448.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32878 Environmental Engineering B Contracting 1,080.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Training-Speaker Fees 32880 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 32881 Sandra Flood 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32882 Jon Forquer a30.35 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32883 David Foster 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32884 Franklin Mutual Ltd. Partnership 611.08 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32885 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 32886 Frye Electronics 789.40 Computer Supplies 32887 Dan Geddis 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32888 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 77.37 Freight Charges rt 32889 Scott Gimbel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32890 Emma Gonzalez 82.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program m 32891 Jack Gonzalez 329.51 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32892 Greg Good 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32893 Raymond Grange 343.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32894 Richard Gamier 357.24 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32885 Timothy Grubb 8 Melinda Findley 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32896 Verizon California 3,497.28 Telephone Services 32897 Robert Hardwick 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32896 John Haupt 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32889 Craig Hechanove 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32900 Barbara Henry 533.10 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32901 Michael Hesse 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32902 Robert HIII 346.99 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32903 Dennis Hoff 86.90 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32904 Dennis How 463.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32905 Industrial Distribution Group 492.37 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 32906 Information Resources 125.00 Human Resources Service 32907 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,346.14 Dues Deduction 32908 Irvine Rench Water District 3.54 Water Use 32909 Ralph Irwin 463.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32910 Charles Jessen 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32911 Donald Johnson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32912 Peter Karsgines 2,449.40 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 01101101 to 01116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32913 Faisal Khan 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32914 Debra Kodman 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32915 Nancy Jane Kvancz 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32916 Lee Larson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32917 William Lawrence 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32918 Leadership Directories, Inc. 289.75 Subscription 32919 Clement Lieber 463.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32920 Ho-Shiang Lin 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32921 Loa Angeles Times-Archives 135.00 Printing 32922 LoJeck 64.56 LoJack Remotest 32923 LIMRILetter 139.00 Subscription 32924 LRP Publications 377.80 Subscription 32925 Gunther Maier 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32926 Oulnolaff Madise 349.16 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32927 Ante Marovic 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32926 Shown Mc Guinness 261.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32929 Francis Gerald McKenna 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32930 Chris Mellas 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32931 Kirk Miller 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32932 Nadine Morey 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32933 Russell Muller 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32934 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 500.00 O&M Training Registration ri. 32935 Scott Nelson 630.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32936 Gloria Newell 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 7 32937 Thomas Nicholson 3,941.92 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32930 Elizabeth O'Grady 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32939 Curtis Olson 741.72 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32940 Orange County CoastKeeper 3,000.00 Membership 32941 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 32942 Orange Valve&Filling Company 2,530.77 Fittings 32943 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcilife 2,000.00 Professional Service-Arbitrage Calculations 32944 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 32945 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 32946 Patrick Park 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32947 Narendrakumar Patel 14l.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32948 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 32949 William Paveloff 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32950 Peace Officers Council of CA 90D.00 Dues Deduction 32951 Pickens Fuel Corp. 3,497.72 Professional Service-CNG Program 32952 Adolph Porras 696.15 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32953 Henry Prisco 104.60 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32954 Mabel Privateer 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32955 Prodata 199.00 Software Mainl, 32955 Jane Provencher 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32957 James Rafferty 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32958 Marlene Reed 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 01101/01 to 01115101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32959 Daniel Regimbal 748.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32960 Livingston Richards 1,206.80 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32961 Steve Rivkind 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32962 Sandra Roosen 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32983 Pamela Rosingena 273.37 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32904 Gilbert Roys 1,170.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32965 Robert Runyam 329.15 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32966 Hafez Sabbagh 277.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32967 Victor Salinas 242.41 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32968 Ramon Sanchez 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32969 Salvatore Scaffide 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32970 Don Schmid 1,054.43 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32971 Terry Schroeder 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32972 Self-Insurance Plana 829.22 State Workers'Compensation User Funding 8 Assessment 32973 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 117.11 Concrete 32974 Edna Shelton $30.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32975 Michael Sinclair 349A6 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32976 David Smelizer 470.96 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32977 Southern California Edison 8,603.07 Power 32978 Southern California Water 74.39 Water Use 32979 Stuart Spencer 830.35 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32980 Tony Spriggs 830.35 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32901 Allison Squires a30.3B Reconciliation User Fee Program 32982 Louie Sterling 741.85 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32983 Jorge Succar 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program or 32984 John Sulley 346.99 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32985 SCESA 160.00 Membership,Southern California Emergency Services Association 32986 Johnny Tedford 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32987 Textile Engineering Associates 12,555.04 Belt Press Supplies-Cylinders 32988 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,674.20 Mechanical Supplies 32989 Ronald Thompson 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32990 Vidah Todd 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32991 Gary Tougse 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32992 Trend Micro,Inc. 4.949.68 Software Mainl. 32993 Ming Two 132.21 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32994 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 3290 US Filter Westates Carbon 3,442.62 Instrument Supplies 32996 Lisa Van Ginkel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32997 William Vance 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32988 Hill Randy Jay Vander 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32999 Gerald Verpoolen 830.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33000 Mike Villafana 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33001 Maurine Vogel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33002 Water Environment Federation 5,000.00 Membership-Sponsor 33003 Water Environment Federation 565.00 Air Duality Meeting Registration 33004 Steven Watson 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 01101101 to 01/15101 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33005 James Wilmolh 3,169.69 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33008 John Windle 530.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33007 WEF-Registration Dept. 450.00 ECM Meeting Registration 33008 Carl Zirschky 264.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33009 John Zitny 630.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33010 Steve Anderson 200.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33011 Norman Eckenrods 5D0.00 Meel ngrTraining Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,360,743.22 Payroll Disbursements 21893-22021 Employee Paychecks $ 174,580.51 Bhveekly Payroll 01/10/01 22022-22028 Interim Paychecks 5,702.52 EMT BOP Payment 20229-20229 Interim Paycheck* 189.51 Adjustment 20231-20231 Interim Paycheck' 3,531.46 Termination 56843-57294 Direct Deposit Statements 712,830.78 Biweekly Payroll 01/10/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 896,834.78 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 97,663.18 December Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 45,470.12 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments S 143,133.30 rt' Total Claims Paid 01/01/01 -01115/01 $ 3,400,711.3D 'NOR Nat check numban 20228 mrouah 20231 ere out of seeuenw:oleo check 920290 was laeuatl In Decemeat and Included on INe pnubue Claims Deb Repor,. Page 9 of 9 of Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 33012 ASL Consulting Engineers $ 51.306.05 Professional Services-11.22 33013 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 84,711.73 Professional Services-J-7" 33014 Boyle Engineering Corporation 36,609.41 Professional Services-1-2-4,2-31 &2-50 33015 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 121,380.94 Natural Gas-Spec. No.9900-28 33016 Carole Engineers 65,235.63 Professional Services-J-25-4 If P2-66 33017 Computational Systems.Inc. 47,061.46 Instruments,Licenses&Certificates 33018 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 25,872.33 Computer Sollware/Hardware&Support 33019 JLM Contracting 68,033.05 Construction Service-Pipe Repair 33020 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 102,805.04 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 33021 Kronos,Inc. 35,057.91 Timekeeping Software,Training and Maintenance 33022 Mee Analytical System 25,000.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 33023 Montgomery Watson 44,837.98 Professional Services-2-21-1 33024 Network Catalyst.Inc. 66.548.16 Computer Software/Hardware 33025 Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. 45,000AO Professional Services-Cleaning Digester at Pit.2 33026 Orange County Sanitation District 31.270.87 Workers Comp. Relmo, 33027 Painewebber lncmporated 41,211.48 COP Remarketing Agreement 33028 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 165,483.03 Engineering Services J42 33029 Petroleum Trader.Corporation 28,733.66 Gasoline 33030 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 269,962.16 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33031 Projects Partners 59.469.17 Temporary Employment Services 33032 Rockwell Engineerng&Equipment Co. 31,435.33 Pump Supplies n 33033 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 173,076.20 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94 33034 Southern Contracting Company 102,317.38 Construction J-33-1 33035 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 79.431.08 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 33036 Vulcan 62,191.42 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 33037 Water Environment Research Foundation 71.760.00 Subscription 33038 Western States Chemical,Inc. 39,688.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 33039 WeodruR,Spradlin&Smart 46,782.54 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 33040 J W Contracting Corporation 105,120.00 Construction P2-60 33041 Ken Thompson,Inc. 476,451.48 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 33042 Margate Construction,Inc. 454,503.00 Construction P2-39 33043 Clinton Construction, Inc 51,468.00 Construction J-52 33044 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 59,010.97 Construction P146-2 33045 Southern Contracting Company 30,229.00 Construction J-33-1 33046 Union Bank of California 62,939.06 Construction 11-17-3, Retention 33047 A-Plus Systems 1,823.28 Notices&Ads 33048 Great American Printing Co. 2.940.91 Paper 33049 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,692.50 Professional Services-Central Gen. Engine#2 33050 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 4,637.35 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33051 Aearo Company 1.288.00 Safety Supplies 33052 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 314.03 Lab Pans&Supplies 33063 Airgas Safety 864.22 Safety Supplies 33054 AliMed,Inc. 201.75 Computer Supplies 33055 American Express 21,427.25 Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies&Services 330M American Management Association 1,525.00 Planning/Design/Engineering Training Registration Page 1 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33057 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 380.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 33058 Appleone Employment Service 4,122.75 Temporary Employment Services 33059 Applied Industrial Technology 46.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33060 Aquent,Inc. 6.575.00 Temporary Employment Services 33061 Arcus Data Security 204.00 OBske Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 33062 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 539.00 Vacuum Truck Services 33063 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 724.10 Waste Removal 33064 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal 33065 Associated Vacuum Tech., Inc. 145.38 Filter 33066 ASS Instrumentation 1,50D.00 Flow Meter Repair 33067 AKM Consulting Engineers 2.081.96 Professional Services 11-20 33068 American Air Filter International 616.58 Filter 33069 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 137.77 Telephone Service 33070 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 178.00 Cellular Telephone Service 33071 Bamstead Thermolyne 1,309.44 Lab Parts&Supplies 33072 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 3,529.23 Voltage Regulator&Electrical Supplies 33073 Battery Specialties 2,210.66 Batteries&Misc.Supplies 33074 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 402.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 33075 BioMedaux Vitsk,Inc. 516.36 Lab Supplies 33076 Bloomberg L.P. 6,301.30 Financial Monitoring MO 4.14-93 33077 Bureau of Reclamation 10,455.D0 Southern California Recycling Cost-Sharing Project-J-36 33078 Burke Engineering Co. 127.54 Electrical Parts&Supplies M 33079 Burrows InddMinuteman 277.66 Reconciliation User Fee Program Ip 33080 Bush&Associates,Inc. 385.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 I 33081 Laurance Butler 34.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program N 33082 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,340.00 Pump Supplies 33083 California Automatic Gate 1.001.26 Service Agreement 33034 Carl R.Nelson,P.E. 3,140.00 Engineering Consultant 241 33085 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 17.771.15 Engineering Services P2-82 It Dairy WashWater Plot Project 33088 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1.282.20 Lease Agreement-Color Printer/Copier System In Communications Div. 33087 City of Santa Ana 24,754.48 Cooperative Projects Program-J-73 33088 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 520.00 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 33089 Cole Scientific 652.30 Lab Services 33090 Communications Performance Group,Inu 22.247.10 Professional Services-Communication,Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 33091 Compressor Components Of California 1.360.50 Mechanical Repairs 33092 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9,862.50 Computer Mainl.Agreement 33093 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 724.46 Electrical Supplies 33094 Converse Consultants 8,889.75 Consulting Services 11-20&P2-60 33095 Cooper Energy Services 5.68 Engine Supplies 33096 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 33097 Corporate Express 538.42 Office Supplies 33098 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,323.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 33099 Cost Containment Solutions 3,419.26 Workers Comp.Services 33100 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 445.45 Communication Equipment Service 33101 County Wholesale Electric Co. 156.57 Electrical Supplies 33102 Crane America Services, Inc. 1,117.60 Crane Services Page 2 of 14 ai Claims Paid From 01116/01 to 01131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33103 Cytec Industries 13,925.25 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 33104 Voided Check - - 33105 Voided Check - - 33106 GEM Corporation 2,891.46 Lab Supplies 33107 CEPA Company 1,325.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 33108 CHMIA 50.00 Membership-Calif. Hazardous Materials Investigators Assoc. 33109 CH2MH111 15,311.55 Engineering Service J-71A 33110 CPI- California Pipeline Inspection 11,623.50 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3-38-1 33111 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 776.61 Lab Supplies 33112 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. 6.840.00 Lab Analysis 33113 CSMFO-Calif.Society of Mun. Fin.Officers 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 33114 CWEA Membership 377.62 Membership -Calif.Water Environment Association 33115 David Jenkins&Assoc,Inc. 450.00 Lab Analysis Service 33116 Del Mar Analytical 1,071.00 Biosolids Analysis 33117 DeZurik C/O Mism/SoulhWesl 5,016.00 Valves 33118 DeZurk C/O Misce/SOUmWest 9,851,44 Valves&Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33119 Diamond H Recognition 797.49 Employee Service Awards 33120 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 834.66 Paint Supplies 33121 DDB Engineering,Inc. 12,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 33122 DGA Consultants,Inc. 10,008.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 33123 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 5.326.86 Electrical Supplies 33124 Eagle Picher Industries,L.L.C. 885.68 Lob Supplies rt 33125 Edinger Medical Group, Inc 740.00 Medical Screening pJ 33126 Electra-Band 996.69 Materials, Mechanical Parts&Supplies 1 33127 Enchanter,Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 w 33128 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 180.00 Lab Supplies 33129 FedEx Corporation 223.34 Air Freight 33130 Filter Supply Company 131.45 Filters 33131 First American Real Estate Solutions 450.82 Orange County Property Information 33132 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,286.46 Lab Supplies 33133 Flo-Systems, Inc. 37.46 Pump Supplies 33134 Michael Foulds 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33135 Fountain Valley Camera 14.86 Photo Supplies 33136 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 77.47 Paint Supplies 33137 Fountain Valley Regional Hospital 273.00 Emergency Room Services 33138 Franklin Covey 119.01 Office Supplies 33139 FST Send and Gravel,Inc 427.42 Road Base Materials 33140 General Electric Supply Company 6,017.04 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33141 Ganahl Lumber Company 185.61 Lumber/Hardware 33142 GarraO-Callahan Company 4,000.22 Chemicals 33143 George Yardley Co. 239.97 Lab Supplies 33144 Gelinge Castle 3,444.00 Lob Maintenance&Supplies 33146 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 16,212.40 Belt Filler Press Supplies 33146 Gold Systems,Inc. 6,891.75 Professional Services-Ocean Data Collection,Storage&Interface 33147 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service,-Spec.#990015 33148 WW Grainger, Inc. 48.38 Electrical Paris&Supplies Page 3 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33149 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 3,412.95 Aerial Lift Repair 33150 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 108.42 Janitorial Supplies 33151 Venzon California 3,435.61 Telephone Services 33152 Hach Company 208.87 Lab Supplies 33153 Harbour Engineering Group 3,926.55 Pump Supplies 33154 Harold Primrose Ice 64.00 Ice For Samples 33155 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc 1.502.49 Plumbing Supplies 33156 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 70.61 Engine Generator Control Supplies 33157 Hawk Industrial Uniform 4.920.56 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33158 Herb's Blacktorest Bakery&Deli 49.00 Meeting Expenses 33159 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 12.99 Compressor Parts 33160 Home Depot 322.53 Small Hardware 33161 lotus Consulting,L.L.C. 3,855.00 Records Management Program 33162 Imaging Plus,Inc. 876.35 Printing Service 33163 In Place Machining 5,730.00 Professional Services-DOSS Pump Seal Upgrade 33164 Industrial Distribution Group 10,940.16 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33165 Information Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service 33166 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 320.19 Lab Supplies 33167 IBM Corporation 6,064.45 IBM AS/400 Lease 33168 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 33169 IECOC 22.00 Communications Meeting Registration w 33170 J&e Auto Parts 240.15 Auto Parts&Supplies rt 33171 J.D. Edwards 1,020.00 Accounting Training Registration q7 33172 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 605.60 Construction Study of Purchasing Building y 33173 Johnstone Supply 162.81 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33174 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 3,750.00 Engineering Services 2-41 33175 Kaman Industrial Technologies 16.04 Instrument Parts&Supplies 33176 Karen Monaco&Associates 4.937.50 FIS Support Services 33177 Kelar Controls Inc. - 822.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33178 Knolls Berry Farm 536.50 Employee Deposit Transfer 33179 Lab Support 6,444.76 Temporary Employment Services 3318D Larry Gagnon 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33181 Law Offices of Kinkle, Rodger&Spriggs 3,584.36 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 33182 Lewis&Lewis Enterprises 92.85 Stationery&Office Supplies 33183 Unbent Cassidy 1,845.DD Professional Service-Human Resources 33184 Listed Corporation 2,816.32 Electrical Supplies 33185 Gerald R.Jones 11,601.04 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 33186 LoJack 681.48 LoJack System&Installation 33187 Maintenance Technology Corp. 395.62 Mechanical Supplies 33168 Manley's Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 1,20D.00 Boiler Repair 33189 MesTec Network Services 402.90 Communication Equipment Upgrade 33190 Material Control,Inc. 1,830.90 Electrical Supplies 33191 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 566.48 Safety Locks 33192 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 911.51 Mechanical Repairs 33193 Media Clips, Inc. 38.00 Notices 33194 Medlin Controls Co. 712.11 Instrument Supplies Page 4 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116/01 to 01131101 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33195 Metal Supply,Inc. 2,080.74 Metal 33196 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,DW.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 33197 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,150.49 Mechanical Repairs, Parts&Supplies 33198 Minadk 500.50 Instrument Supplies 33199 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 155.60 Janitorial Supplies 33200 Mission Uniform Service 3,902.50 Uniform Rentals 33201 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 33202 MGD Technologies,Inc. 2.477.50 Temporary Flow Monitoring 11-22 33203 Mine Safety Appliances Company 355.95 Safety Supplies 33204 MSA Instrument Division 1.207.02 Instrument Supplies 33205 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 33206 Neal Supply Co. 1,301.19 Plumbing Supplies 33207 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 3,900.00 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training Program 33208 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 10,579.40 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 33209 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 6,654.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 33210 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 33211 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 133.60 Steel Tags 33212 Office Depot Business Services Div. 642.38 Office Supplies 33213 Optio Software 9,627.84 Optio Form Implementation 33214 Orange County Winwater Works 64.91 Plumbing Supplies 33215 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 77&15 Fittings 33216 Oxygen Service Company 2,26S60 Specialty Gases r�r 33217 OCB Reprographics 722.23 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 cad 33218 OI Analytical 144.77 Lab Supplies N 33219 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 247.74 Air Conditioner Supplies 33220 Pacific Bell 23.41 Telephone Services 33221 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 33222 Pacific Health&Safety, Inc. 1,805.00 Professional Service-Industrial Hygiene 33223 Pacific Mechanical Supply - 9,864.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33224 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 3,353.92 Electrical Supplies 33225 Parker Hannifin Corporation 477.32 Mechanical Supplies 33226 Parker Supply Company 846.31 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 33227 Parkhouse Tire Co. 35.26 Auto Parts&Supplies 33228 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 720.25 Janitorial Supplies 33228 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 876.70 Lab Supplies 33230 Polydyne,Inc. 17,003.88 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 33231 Precise Sensor, Inc. 1,078.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33232 Primary Source 11,480.28 Office Furniture 33233 Primedia Information,Inc. 78.48 Publica9on 33234 Process Equipment Company 846.46 Pump Supplies 33235 Propipe 1,434.51 OCTV Sewerine Inspection-2-41 33236 Ouse.J.D.Edwards Users Group 1,050.00 IT Training Registration 33237 COS, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 33238 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 33239 Rain for Rent 2,735.77 Pumping Services-5-51 33240 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.96 Trash Removal Page 5 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33241 Ralnin Insimment Co.,Inc. 337.29 Lab Services 33242 Reliestar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7.988.78 Life Insurance Premium 33243 Restek Corp 674.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 33244 Royal Wholesale Electric 288.42 Junction Box Cover 33245 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 329.89 Paint Supplies 33246 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 22.726.00 Construction -Manhole Repair 33247 Schwing America,Inc 1,074.86 Pump Supplies 33248 Sensolec,Inc. 269.35 Electrical Supplies 33249 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 376.64 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33250 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3.500.00 Prof.Services-Chino Basin$500 Walennasler Transfer,&Santa Ana Watershed Group$3,0D0 33251 Sievers Instruments 657.16 Lab Supplies 33252 Supelco, Inc. 72.65 Lab Supplies 33253 Skater,Inc. 2,768.69 Lab Supplies 33254 So.Cal.Gas Company 5,847.32 Natural Gas 33255 South Coast Environmental Co. 3,830.23 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 33256 South Coast Water 144.65 Water System Supplies 33257 Sparkle0s 2,049.61 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 33258 Spex Ceriprep,Inc. 502.41 Lab Supplies 33259 Spherion Corpoatlon 10,000.00 Senior Executive Coaching Program 33280 Stainless Micro-Polish 541.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33261 State Board of Equalization 494.86 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 33262 State Water Resources Control Board 855.00 Publications-Administrative Records of(2)Law Cases 33263 Strata International,Inc. 605.46 Chemicals Lq 33264 StudioVisia 250.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Mainl. 33265 Summit Steel 33.86 Metal 33266 Sunset Industrial Parts 61.94 Mechanical Supplies 33287 Sae America 699.79 Freight Charges 33268 SARBS-CWEA. 10.00 Membership 33269 SKC-West,Inc. 1,715.20 Safely Supplies 33270 STL Sacramento 10,387.60 Lab Analytical Service 33271 Tee",Inc. 7,005.91 Valves&Mechanical Supplies 33272 Tennant Company 20,221.97 (1)Tennant Shop Sweeper 33273 Tetra Tech,Inc. 7,424.11 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 33274 The Pittsburgh Conference 180.00 Lab Training Registration 33276 The Orange County Register 1.608.76 Notices&Ads 33276 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 11,688.52 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33277 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 33278 Daily Pilot 118.75 Notices&Ads 33279 Todd's Enterprises 2,247.29 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33280 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 73.31 Locks&Keys 33281 Tren Consulting Engineers 10,007.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects-P1.65 33292 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9,859.66 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 33283 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc 1,462.25 Truck Supplies 33284 TCH Associates, Inc. 995.65 Lab Supplies 33285 Teksystems 11,379.00 Temporary Employment Service 33288 U.S.Filler Corporation 2,525.50 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System Page 6 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131/01 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33379 AKM Consulting Engineers 32,624.45 Professional Services 7-36,7-39.741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 33380 Blue Cross of California 188,159.59 Medical Insurance Premium 33381 Brown&Caldwell 88,167.07 Engineering Services P7-37 33382 Carollo Engineers 67,344.52 Professional Services-P7-60,J-39 33383 City of La Habra 240,548.65 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73 33364 Computerized Facility Intergratlon 112,303.60 Engineering Service J-25-1 33385 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 63.836.81 Computers-(3)Server Replacements 33386 Delta Dental 47.531.64 Dental Insurance Plan 33387 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 90.373.36 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 33388 Lee&Ro, Inc. $5.420.40 Engineering Services 549,5-50,5.51,5452&P2-39,P247-1,J47 33389 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 230,306,07 Engineering Services J42 33390 Polydyne, Inc. 31,602.25 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 33391 Projects Partners 27,931.73 Temporary Employment Services 33392 City of Seal Beach 118,758.09 Water Use 33393 Southern Califomia Edison 49,656.02 Pourer 33394 Southern Contracting Company 144,095.16 Construction J-33-1 33395 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 83,837.36 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33396 Vulcan 37,g87.73 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 33397 A Biederman,Inc. 1,236.23 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33398 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.38 Hardware 33389 Accutite Fasteners,Inc. 906.72 Fasteners 33400 Great American Printing Co. 166.80 Printing rrr 33401 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 6,954.29 Mechanics[Parts&Supplies 33402 Air Products&Chemicals 24.136.35 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 33403 Airgas Safely 115.93 Safety Supplies 33404 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 3,166.08 Manhole Frames&Covers 33405 Analysts, Inc. 2,032.48 Testing Kits 33406 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 415.00 Lab Supplies 33407 Appleone Employment Service - 2,602.96 Temporary Employment Services 33408 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 3,100.00 Toxicity Testing 33409 Bailey, Fisher&Porter 370.54 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33410 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 32.24 Telephone Service 33411 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,191.98 Long Distance Telephone Service 33412 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,080.70 Cellular Telephone Service 33413 Battery Specialties 908.16 Batteries 33414 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 15,183.55 Engineering Services-J-71-3 33415 Boot Bam 96.87 Reimbursable Safety Shona 33416 Breaker Supply Company 134.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33417 C.S.U.F.Foundation 9,550.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 33418 California Automatic Gate 115.00 Service Agreement-Automatic Gates&Barriers at Pit. 1 and Pit.2 33419 California Chamber of Commerce 45.30 Subscription 33420 Calaol,Inc. 3,269.48 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 33421 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 33422 Chores P.Crowley Co. 3,572.15 Instrument Parts 33423 Robert L.Chenowith 807.38 Employee Computer Loan Program 33424 Coast Transmission 1,631.81 Auto Repair Page 9 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01/31101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33426 Compressor Components Of California 780.00 Mechanical Parts&Testing 33426 Compuse,Inc. 216.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 33427 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 9,553.23 Electrical Supplies 33428 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 16.34 Plumbing Supplies 33429 Converse Consultants 7,056.00 Consulting Service 11-20 33430 Cooper Energy Services 9,296.33 Engine Supplies 33431 Corporate Express Imaging 482.05 Computer Supplies 33432 Corporate Express 462.30 Office Supplies 33433 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 33434 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 130.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33435 County of Orange-Auditor Controller %00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 33436 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,582.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33437 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 33438 CDN Isotopes 310.00 Lab Supplies 33439 CR&R, Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 33440 CWEA Annual Conference 1,230.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 33441 Dart Controls,Inc 1,527.36 Instrument Supplies 33442 David's Tree Service 360.00 Tree Maint.Service 33443 Del Mar Analytical 1,566.00 Biosolids Analysis 33444 De2unk C/O Misco/SouthWest 310.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33445 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 274.66 Paint Supplies 33446 DDB Engineering, Inc. 2,820.00 Temporary Employment Services M 33447 DGA Consultants, Inc. 12,132.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 33448 E.G. Brannon&Co. 95.00 Shredder Repairs 33449 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 1,169.49 Electrical Supplies 0 33450 E.G. Hellers Son,Inc 68.12 Mechanical Supplies 33451 Enchanter, Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 33452 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 33453 Environmental Systems Research Inal. 1,328.37 Software 33454 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 33455 FadEx Corporation 205.35 Air Freight 33468 Filter Supply Company 880.36 Fillers 33457 First American Real Estate Solutions 254.00 Orange County Property Information 33468 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,034.52 Lab Supplies 33459 Flo-Systems, Inc. 482.99 Pump Supplies 33460 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 1,022.00 Engineering Services P-183 33461 Thermo Forma 112.83 Lab Supplies 33462 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 19,527.05 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 33463 Fountain Valley Camera 13.71 Photo Supplies 33464 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 239.90 Truck Wash Tickets 33465 Foxboro Company 4,185.90 Instrument Supplies 33466 Franklin Covey 688.99 Office Supplies 33467 Fry's Electronics 2,149.26 Computer Supplies 33468 City of Fullerton 163.13 Water Use 33469 FM International,Inc. 5.131.37 Professional Services J-25-1 33470 Ganahl Lumber Company 1,620.97 Lumber/Hardware Page 10 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131101 V Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33471 Garrail-Callahan Company 1,400.64 Chemicals 33472 Gilmour Group 2,465.00 Hoses 33473 Gold Systems,Inc. 2,930.00 Professional Services-Ocean Data Collection,Storage&Interface 33474 Goldeirwest Window Service 315.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.a990015 33475 WIN Grainger, Inc. 5,475.21 Electrical Pans&Supplies 33476 Graybar 55.84 Electrical Supplies 33477 Guardian Business Forme, Inc. 146.40 Printing 33478 GBC(General Binding Corp) 1,978.36 Stationery&Office Suplies 33479 Vernon California 837.50 Telephone Services 33480 Hach Company 1,624.76 Lab Supplies 33481 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc 281.81 Plumbing Supplies 33482 Hatch&Kirk, Inc 106.15 Engine Generator Control Supplies 33483 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 29.00 Meeting Expenses 33484 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 267.57 Compressor Pans 33485 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 4,371.95 Engineering Services P1444 33486 Home Depot 640.10 Small Hardware 33487 Hopkins Technical Products 2,053.36 Pump Supplies 33488 Hub Auto Supply 129.78 Truck Parts 33489 City of Huntington Beech 25.29 Water Use 33490 lotus Consulting,L.L.C. 8,317.50 Records Management Program 33491 Idexx 20.394.66 Lab Supplies �. 33492 Industrial Distribution Group 4,895.32 Mechanical Tools, Pads&Supplies rr 33493 Industrial Metal Supply 533.18 Metal 33494 Infinity Technology USA 3,627.16 Computer Supplies If 33495 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 936.51 Lab Supplies 33496 J&L Industrial Supply 1,304.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33497 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 2,185.99 Misc.Construction Services-Sinkhole Repair in Newport Beach 33498 Jays Catering 365.91 Meeting Expenses 33499 Johnstone Supply 1,206.22 Electrical Supplies 335M Karen Monaco&Associates 7,250.00 FIS Support Services 33501 Kelly Paper 78.43 Paper 33502 Kronos,Inc. 2.250.00 IT&Accounting FIS Upgrade Training for Timekeeping Program 33503 Lab Support 4,071.88 Temporary Employment Services 335D4 Label Master 335.93 Safety Supplies 33505 LeMotte Company 76.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 33506 Lexis-Nexis 493.24 Books&Publications 33507 Gerald R.Jones 1,350.00 Professional Service-DART MO9-22-99 33508 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 1,963.50 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 33509 Maintenance Technology Corp. 190.92 Mechanical Supplies 33510 MarVac Electronics 98.31 Electrical Pans&Supplies 33511 MasTec Network Servloea 307.26 Communica9on Equipment Upgrade 33512 Mail Chips,Inc. 2,044.92 Valves 33513 Mc Junkin Corp-Ontario Branch 78.42 Plumbing Supplies 33514 Medlin Controls Co. 130.30 Instrument Supplies 33515 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 8,027.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33516 Mission Uniform Service 3,906.09 Uniform Rentals Page 11 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33517 MotoPhoto 107.83 Photographic Services 33518 Multiforce Systems Corp. 4,395.00 Computer Equip.Services-Fuel Mgmt. System 33519 MGD Technologies,Inc. 4,350.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 33520 MSI Metal Supply Inc 138.88 Metal 33521 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 33522 Neel Supply Co. 2,474.98 Plumbing Supplies 33523 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 7,251.93 Security System Maintenance 33524 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 21.56 Steel Togs 33525 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,326.29 Office Supplies 33520 OneSourca Distributors, Inc. 20.00 Freight Charges 33527 Optio Software 2,421.39 Oplio Form Implementation 33628 Orange County Business Council 595.00 IT Meeting Registration 33529 Orange County Health Care Agency 70.00 Underground Tank Storage Fee 33530 Orange County Hose Company 100.95 Fillings 33531 Orange County Winwaler Works 242.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33532 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 107.45 Valves&Fittings 33533 Oscars Lock&Safe 34.93 Keys 33534 Oxygen Service Company 2,023.21 Specially Gases 33535 OCB Reprographics 99.15 Printing Service-MO 126100 33536 OCV Valve 35.64 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 33537 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 376.13 Electrical Supplies 33538 Pacific Bell 16.26 Telephone Services N 33539 Pacific Insulation Company 58.47 Mechenical Pens&Supplies m 33540 Pacific Mechanical Supply 22,030.65 Pump,Plumbing Parts&Supplies Y 33541 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 175.81 Mechanical Parts&Supplies nr 33542 Pagenel 2,531.83 Paging Services 33543 Parker Supply Company 2,109.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33544 Parkhcuse Tire Co. 928.83 Time 33545 Parts Unlimited 521.52 Truck Supplies 33545 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 675.00 Lob Equipment Repass 33547 Port Supply 128.98 Foul Weather Gear 33548 Power Electro Supply Co.,Ina, 170.26 Electrical Supplies 33549 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.50 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 33550 Premier Fastener Company $80.33 Fasteners 33551 Primary Source 5,193.09 Office Furniture 33552 Project Management Institute 170.15 Publications 33553 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,273.38 Mechanical Supplies 33554 Putzmeister 22.65 Pump Supplies 33555 PCS Express 104.00 Courier Service 33556 PSI 90.00 Electrical Maintenance 33557 OOS, L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 33558 Rellastar 21.402.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 33559 Ragastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,948.78 Life Insurance Premium 33560 Rick Arbour&Associates 2,232.00 Consulting Service-O&M Worker Competency&Training Project 33661 Rolle-Royce Energy Systems 1,277.58 Electrical Paris&Supplies 33562 RosemounUUnlloc 415.58 Instrument Supplies Page 12 of 14 " Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33583 RPM Electric Motors 2,088.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33584 Schwing America, Inc. 20.497.75 Schwing Pump Parts&Repair 335M Scott Specially Gases,Inc. 523.99 Specially Gases 33566 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 342.81 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33567 Shepherd Machinery Co. 190.66 Truck Supplies 33588 Sigma Chemical Co. 979.48 Lab Supplies 33569 Skalar, Inc. 41.73 Lab Supplies 33570 SoAView Computer Products 324.75 Stationery&Office Supplies 33571 SoBChoice 442.87 Software 33572 State Board of Equalization 294.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 33573 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 65.92 Office Supplies 33574 Sun International 157.12 Lab Supplies 33575 Sunset Ford 332.98 Vehicle Supplies 33576 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,192.59 Mechanical Supplies 33577 SPEC Services,Inc. 2,885.02 Engineering Services J-33-1 33578 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 33579 Telavera&Richardson 630.00 Consulting Services-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 33580 Taylor-Dunn 1,522.8E Electric Cart Parts 33581 Teledyne Analytical 164.27 Instrument Parts 33582 Textile Engineering Associates 4,021.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33583 The Merriwood Corporation 4,574.00 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection P, 33584 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.782.89 Electrical Parts&Supplies rt 33585 Thyssen Dover Elevator 3,840.00 Elevator Maintenance 33586 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 33587 Tony's Lack&Safe Service&Sales 7.26 Locks&Keys w 33588 The Trans Company 3,009.49 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 33589 Troy Systems,Inc. 863.12 Computer Supplies 33590 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 856.78 Truck Supplies 33591 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 180.00 Lab Services 33592 Tekaystems 5,859.00 Temporary Employment Services 33593 Union Bank of California 756.19 Banking Services 33594 United Parcel Service 1,012.46 Parcel Services 33595 US Filler Weslales Carbon 3.359.33 Instrument Supplies 33596 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,608.29 Plumbing Supplies 33597 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,862.00 Temporary Employment Service 33598 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 11,769.72 Lab Supplies 33599 Wastewater Technology Trainers 730.00 O&M Training Registration 33600 Waxie Sanitary Supply 351.10 Janitorial Supplies 33601 Western States Chemical,Inc. 9,103.06 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 33602 Xerox Corporation 10,627.29 Copier Leases 33603 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 106.37 Office Supplies 33604 The Yakima Company 14,248.85 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 33605 Balachandre P.Rao 1,678.86 Lab Testing Service 33606 Marcus D. Dubois 682.11 Meetingrtralning Expense Reimbursement 33607 Orange County Sanitation District 841,59 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,019,662.23 Page 13 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 22029-22094 Interim Paychecks $ 70.053.07 Annual Payouts 01/17/01 22095-22095 Interim Paycheck 1,025.60 Flexible Spending Plan Reimbursement 01/17/01 22096-22207 Employee Paychecks 164.547.29 Biweekly Payroll 01/24/01 22208-22211 Interim Paychecks 448.04 Directors'Paychecks 01124f01 57295-57744 Direct Deposit Statements 729,707.92 Biweekly Payroll 01/24/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 965,781.92 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 298,809.37 January Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation State Street Bank 2,425,073.80 January Interest Payment on Series 1990-92 Advance Refund Certificates of Participation State Street Bank 526,801.84 Overdraft Payment on Series 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 3,250,685.01 p Total Claims Paid 01/16/01 -01131101 $11,236,329.16 d w rt if Page 14 of 14 ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date 7o ed.or DI < 03/28/01 AGENDA REPORT tem Number Item Number _ e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item; NIA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/01/01 -02/15/01 and 02/16/01 - 02/28/01 G1.ftU Dd.B—a ADenW Re,.IQDO 1 B.,D ADendn D,, 1D301111em Bd.. Rev,se¢ MOMS Page 1 Claims Paid From 02/01/01 to 02115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 33608 Orange County Sanitation District $ 438.292.72 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 33609 Airgas Safety 3,760.20 Safely Supplies 33610 American Airlines 4.337.50 Travel Services 33611 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 203.44 Publication 33612 Court Order 516.0D Wage Garnishment 33613 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 33614 Cad Warren&Co. 436.29 Insurance Claims Administrator 33615 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,279.23 Copier Lease 33616 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 33617 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 253.20 Electrical Supplies 33618 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 227.88 Plumbing Supplies 33619 Cotelligent 1,268.75 Software Support 33620 CMAA-Const.Mgmt.Assoc.of America 54.00 Construction Mgmt. Meeting Registration 33821 CMAA-Const.Mgmt,Assoc. of America 100.00 Membership 33622 CWFA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 33623 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 24.718.55 Computers-Gigabite Ethernet Modules for Catalyst 6500 Backbone Switch 33624 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 33625 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 33626 Government Finance Officers Association 396.00 Publication 33627 Vedzon 105.37 Telephone Service 33628 Verizon California 1,379.54 Telephone Service 33629 Industrial Metal Supply 2,304.99 Metal 33630 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 631.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33631 Intl. Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 33632 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 33633 J.D. Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.00 Membership 33634 Los Angeles Times-Archives 405.00 Publications 33635 Marshall Institute 995.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 33636 MarVac Electronics 21.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33637 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 581.84 Lab Parts&Supplies 33638 NETSOL/Network Solution 1.800.00 Engineering Services-Autocad As-Builts Campus Voice Backbone Plans 33639 OneSourca Distributors,Inc. 1,236.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33640 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 33641 Orange County Pump Co. 260.90 Pump Supplies 33642 Orange Valve&Filling Company 124.24 Fillings 33643 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 33644 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,561.38 Plumbing Supplies 33645 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 33646 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 33647 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 33648 Pryor Resources,Inc. 1,806.00 O&M Training Registration 33649 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,327.20 Concrete 33650 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 159.88 Tools/Nardware 33651 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 6,600.00 Prof.Sws.-Chino Basin$1.500 Transfer& Dairy Producers$4.000 Transfer 33652 Sludge Newsletter 409.00 Subscription Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/01 to 02115/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33653 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 18.66 Plumbing Supplies 336M Snap On Industrial 886.94 Tools 33655 South Coast AOMD 14,999.19 SCAOMD Operating Fees 33656 Southern California Edison 6.696.53 Pourer 33657 Seegm,Inc. 147.90 Lab Pans&Supplies 33658 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc, 264.52 Mechanical Supplies 33659 The Unisource Corporation 96.22 Paper 33660 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 33661 Universal Map 185.00 Office Supplies 33662 Vibration Institute 1.050.00 O&M Training Registration 33663 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1,114.92 Lab Supplies 33664 Western Business Systems 114.28 Forms 33665 Nicholas J.Aromas 216.69 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33666 Robert P.Ghirelli 378.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33667 Ingrid G. Hellebrand 120.00 MeatingRraining Expense Reimbursement 33658 Southern California Edison 2.500.00 Plan Check Deposit Fee,241 33669 South Coast AOMD 20,057.06 SCAOMD Operating Fees 33670 A-Plus Systems 2,552.t10 Notices&Ads 33671 Accul to Fasteners, Inc. 81.49 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 33672 Action Technologies 2,500A0 Planning/Design/Engineering Meeting Registration 33673 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,773.05 Professional Services-Central Gen. Engine#2 33674 Air Cold Supply 95.81 Air Conditioner Supplies 33675 Air Products&Chemicals 356.20 Lab Supplies 33676 Airborne Express 849.30 Air Freight 33677 Airges Safety 46.96 Safety Supplies 33678 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 380.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 33679 Appleone Employment Service 2,011.35 Temporary Employment Servlcas 33680 Agcent,Inc. 1,937.60 Temporary Employment Services 33681 Artistic Blinds 75.00 Mini Blinds&Installation 33682 Atlantis Pool Care 750.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg.Atrium 33683 AGX Corporation 353.25 Gouge 33684 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 23.07 Telephone Service 33685 AWSI 903.80 Department of Transportation Training Program 33686 Battery Specialties 2,786.95 Batteries 33687 Burke Engineering Co. 566.00 Electrical Supplies 33688 Bush&Associates,Inc. 2,418.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 33689 California Auto Collision 293.12 Windshield Replacement 33690 Canus Corporation 220.00 Electrical Supplies 33691 Carollo Engineers 11,023.00 Engineering Services-J-66&IMANS Testing 33692 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 11,899.91 Engineering Services-P2-82&J-52 33693 Chapman University 17,000.00 Leadership Training Registration 33694 Coast to Coast 126.00 Publications 33695 Coast Fire Equipment 11.10 Service Agreement 33696 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 161.13 Publications 33697 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 500.00 Professional Services-Communication,Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 33698 Compressor Components O1 California 780.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 02101101 to 02116101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Oescrip0on 33699 Compupul,Inc. 102.36 Computer Supplies 33700 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,191.29 Electrical Supplies 33701 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 16.13 Plumbing Supplies 33702 Converse Consultants 1,516.50 Consulting Services P2-60 33703 Cooper Energy Services 1,510.67 Engine Supplies 33704 Corporate Express Imaging 455.80 Computer Supplies 33705 Corporate Express 427.51 Office Supplies 33706 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,609.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 33707 Cost Containment Solutions 1.722.78 Worker's Comp.Services 33708 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.086.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33709 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 33710 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 489.00 Lab Supplies 33711 CR&R,Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 33712 CWEA Annual Conference 5,485.00 O&M and Source Control Training Registration 33713 CWFA Membership 60.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 33714 David's Tree Service 300.00 Tree Maint.Service 33715 Del Mar Analytical 351.00 Blosolids Analysis 33716 Diamond H Recognition 228.54 Employee Service Awards 33717 Dionix Corporation 625.D0 Lab Maintenance Agreement 33718 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 140.83 Point Supplies 33719 DDB Engineering,Inc. 4.000.00 Temporary Employment Services 33720 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 444.27 Electrical Supplies 33721 Enchanter,Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 33722 FedEx Corporation 217.95 Air Freight 33723 Filler Supply Company 245.52 Fillers 33724 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 693.33 Lab Supplies 33725 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 7,031.50 Short-Term Disability Ins, Premium 33726 Fountain Valley Camera 145.08 Photo Supplies 33727 Franklin Covey 298.25 Office Supplies 33726 Fry's Electronim 440.46 Computer Supplies 33729 Ganahl Lumber Company 270.38 Lumber/Hardware 33730 Garratt-Callahan Company 1.511.24 Chemicals 33731 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,422.54 Electrical Pens&Supplies 33732 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 293.30 Aerial Lift Rental/Repairs 33733 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 587.61 Instrument Supplies 33734 Verizon Califomia 1.292.47 Telephone Service 33735 Ponton Industries 813.67 Instrument Supplies 33736 Harbour Engineering Group 2,877.37 Wemce Impeller&Metal 33737 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 939.74 Plumbing Supplies 33738 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 293.86 Engine Generator Control Supplies 33739 John Haupt 830.38 Reconciliation Lear Fee Program 33740 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 64.50 Meeting Expenses 33741 HIM.Inc. 2,230.20 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33742 Hoemiger Service,Inc. 2,824.66 Compressor Parts 33743 Home Depot 478.11 Small Hardware 33744 Hopkins Technical Products 483.59 Pump Supplies Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/01 to 02/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33745 lotus Consulting, L.L.C. 7,860.00 Records Management Program 33746 Idm 1,262.02 Lab Supplies 33747 Industrial Distribution Group 2,343.32 Tools&Min.Supplies 33748 Industrial Metal Supply 832.87 Metal 33749 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 98.56 Lab Supplies 33750 J&B Auto Parts 40.42 Auto Parts&Supplies 33751 J.O'Brien Company,Inc. 693.17 Employee Securfty I.D. Badge Holders 33752 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 3,681.03 Misc.Construction-Sewer Pipe Repair&Irrigation Valve Replacement Project 33753 Karen Monaco&Associates 7,562.50 FIS Support Services 33754 Lab Support 1,377.63 Temporary Employment Services 33755 Label Master 153.73 Safety Supplies 33766 Lawrence Butler 34.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33757 Liabert Cassidy 3,061.50 Professional Service-Human Resources 33758 Gerald R.Janes 10,405.29 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 33759 Liquid Handling Systems 11,792.75 Pump&Pump Supplies 337W Lucc's 95.00 Meeting Expense 33761 MasTec Network Services 291.73 Communication Equipment Upgrade 33762 Mall Chlor, Inc. 3,201.22 Valves 33763 MCBain Instruments 110.00 Lab Supplies 33764 Media Clips,Inc. 385.80 Notices 33765 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,636.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33766 Mission Uniform,Service 4.053.50 Uniform Rentals 33767 Morton Salt 1,099.86 Salt 33768 MAP 15,830.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs 33769 MGD Technologies, Inc. 4,350.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 3-25&5.43 33770 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 33771 National Water Research Institute 12.00 Publication 33772 Neal Supply Co. 976.85 Plumbing Supplies 33773 Nlckey Petroleum Co., Inc. 4.340.98 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 33774 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 12,111.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 33775 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 33776 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,746.30 Lab Services 33777 Office Depot Business Services Div. 775.24 Office Supplies 33778 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 10,963.75 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 33779 Orange County Hose Company 155.03 Hose Supplies&Repairs 33780 Orange County Winwater Works 42.41 Plumbing Supplies 33781 Oxygen Service Company 60.19 Specialty Gases 33782 OCB Reprographics 239.89 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 33783 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,048.42 Plumbing Supplies 33784 Pacific Parts&Controls 7,164.87 Electrical Equipment, Parts&Supplies 33765 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 175.81 Freight Charges 33786 Peachpit Press 91.18 Publication 33767 Pead Art&Craft 57.17 Art&Graphic Supplies 33786 Pena Pure, Inc 206.88 Filter 33769 Petroleum Traders Corporation 12,603.61 Gasoline 33790 Pitney Bowes 314.25 Postage Machine Service Agreement Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/01 to 07JI5101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33791 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 173.76 Electrical Supplies 33792 Cambridge Integrated Service 6,250.00 Workers Camp.Claims Admin. 33793 Primary Source 4,031.25 Office Furniture 33794 PRIMA 695.00 Finance Training Registration 33795 PRIMA: Public Risk Management Assoc. 295.00 Membership 33796 Realtime Systems Corporation 3,499.80 Professional Services-Supervisory Control&Data Acgusition Software Upgrade 33797 Restek Corp. 143.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 33798 Rota Rooter 1,000.00 Sewer Line Maintenance 33799 RPM Electric Motors 458.51 Electrical Parts If Supplies 33800 RSA Sutter Soil Products 3,192.76 Soil Materials 33801 Safelite Glass Corp. 143.78 Windshield Replacement 33802 Sancon Engineering,Inc 1,015.00 Construction-Pumping Service 33803 Schwing America, Inc. 6,776.84 Pump Repairs&Supplies 33804 Scott Specially Gases,Inc 378.17 Specialty Gases 33805 Sergio Jiminez 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33806 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 86.68 Painting Supplies 33807 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 878.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33808 Supelco,Inc. 366.17 Lab Supplies 33809 Soto-Lynch Corp. 84.30 Janitorial Supplies 33810 SoftView Computer Products 625.88 (15)Nan-Glare Computer Screens 33811 SoflChoioe 1,485.98 Software 33812 South Coast Air Ouslity Management Dist. 958.20 Permit Fees 33813 Southern California Edison 2.038.60 Power 33814 Spez Cerprep, Inc. 80.03 Lab Supplies 33816 Sterling An 22.47 Art Supplies 33816 Summit Steel 169.08 Metal 33817 Sunset Industrial Parts 98.62 Mechanical Supplies 33818 Super Chem Corporation 1,312.97 Chemicals 33819 SARBS-CWEA 20.00 O&M Training Registration 33820 Tasew,Inc. 6,366.15 Valves 33821 Technomic Publishing Company,Inc. 224.95 Publication 33822 Tetlile Engineering Associates 19.973.50 Bell Press Supplies 33823 The Orange County Register 1.615.95 Notices&Ads 33824 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 750.92 Mechanical Supplies 33825 Daily Pilot 231.25 Notices&Ads 33826 Total News Tracking 83A3 Office Supplies 33827 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 33828 Teksyslems 6,722.00 Temporary Employment Services 33829 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 33830 Ultra Scientific 417.53 Lab Supplies 33631 United Parcel Service 304.69 Parcel Services 33832 Unocal 76 187.44 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38.1 Inspection 33833 Industrial Air Compressor 1.317.84 Valve Supplies 33834 Valley Cities Supply Company 207.71 Plumbing Supplies 33835 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 4.615.00 Temporary Employment Service 33836 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.202.88 Vision Service Premium Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01101 to 02M6101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33837 VWR Scienfific Products Corporation 4,925.17 Lab Parts&Supplies 33838 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,359.72 Seventy Guards 33839 Wastewater Technology Trainers 4,950.00 O&M Training Registration 33840 Waxie Sanitary Supply 317.34 Janitorial Supplies 33841 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 1,323.90 Safety Supplies 33842 Western States Chemical,Inc. 11,034.07 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95 33843 Witeg Scientific 305.58 Lab Supplies 33844 Xerox Corporation 2,818.87 Copier Leases 33845 Olsson Construction,Inc. 23,297.00 Construction J-52&Fuzzy Filter Piping Installation 33846 Union Bank of California 3,761,68 Construction J-53, Retention 33647 David M.Chafe 2.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 33848 County of Orange 366.00 Maps 33849 Gary Aguirre and Ftys Electronics 1,063.29 Employee Computer Loan Program 33050 Orange County Sanitation District 1,342.43 Petty Cash Reimb. 33851 AKM Consulting Engineers 64,709.40 Professional Services 7-36,7-39,741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 33852 RPI/Blo Gm 92,256.56 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 33853 Boyle Engineering Corporation 27,310.96 Engineering Services 1.24,2-31 &2-50 33854 Carolkr Engineers 60,481.06 Professional Services J-254 33855 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 134.916.67 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 33856 Mac Analytical System 40,960.50 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 33857 Oracle Corp 32.480.17 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 33858 Orange County Water District 44,556.80 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 33859 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 285,856.00 Engineering Services J42 33860 Synagro West,Inc. 140,999.38 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33861 Polydyne,Inc. 28.551.00 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 33862 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 193,800.73 Ocean Monitoring MO6-8-94 33863 So.Cal.Gas Company 33,426.67 Natural Gas 33864 Southern Contracting Company 44.301.00 Construction J-33-1 33865 Tule Ranch/Magen Farms 68,156.19 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 33866 Vulcan 32,994.34 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 33867 The Yakima Company 32,790.46 Residuals Removal MO3-22-00 33868 J W Contracting Corporation 301,860.00 Construction P2.60 33069 Ken Thompson,Inc. 216,943.72 Construction 11-17.3&11.20 33870 Margate Construction,Inc. 423,177.00 Construction P239 33871 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 71,472.05 Construction P145-2&J-53 33872 Orange County Sanitation District 25,269.16 Worker's Comp.Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,374,883. 11 Payroll Disbursements 22212-22346 Employee Paychecks If 172,753.02 Biweekly Payroll 02107/01 22347-22351 Interim Paychecks 552.38 Directors'Paychecks 57745-58199 Direct Deposit Statements 717,595.43 Biweekly Payroll 02107/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 890.900.83 Page 6 of - Claims Paid From 02 O1101 to 02115101 ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas, National Assoc. $ 47,999.77 January Interest Payment on Sexes 1993 Certificates of Participation Societe Generale, N.V.Branch 56,001.74 Standby Letter of Credit Chase Manhattan Bank 79,064.46 Series 2000 Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement Fee Chase Bank of Texas, National Assoc. 95,979.74 Societe Generale January Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 279,065.71 Total Claims Paid 02/01101 -02115101 $ 4,544,849.75 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 021116101 to 02128101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 33873 Orange County Sanitation District $ 441,941.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 33874 Southern California Edison 45,2%0l Pourer 33875 SCAP 48,000.00 Membership 33876 Union Bank of California 33,540.00 Construction P2-60, Retention 33877 Alrgas Safety 1.227.22 Safety Supplies 33878 American Express 23.803.47 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 33879 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 313.56 Telephone Service 33880 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 3.188.63 Telephone Equipment Service-Si-Annual Contract 33881 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 33882 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 33883 Clean Water Report 302.00 Publication 33884 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 33885 Compressor Components Of California 780.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33886 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 269.24 Plumbing Supplies 33887 CASA-Calif.Assoa of Sanitation Agencies 15,000.00 Districts Share of EIR Litigation Re Biosolids 33888 Dawson Company 2,483.28 Plumbing Supplies 33889 Court Order 525.00 Wage Gamishment 33890 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 33891 Venzon California 3,407.29 Telephone Services 33892 Huntington Supply Co.,Inc. 72.4E Hardware 33693 Industrial Metal Supply 2,076.72 Metal 33894 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 72.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33895 Ind. Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 50 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 33896 Irvine Ranch Water District 52.58 Water Use 33897 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 690.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33698 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 16.752.75 Mechanical Parts, Repairs&Supplies 33899 Orange County Marshal 100.D0 Wage Garnishment 33900 Orange Valve It Fitting Company 2,118.46 Fittings 33901 OCFA 495.12 Dues Deduction 33902 Pacific Bell 14.54 Telephone Services 33903 Pacific Investment Management Co. 12,936.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 33904 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 33905 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 33906 Peace Officers Council of CA 9D9.00 Dues Deduction 33907 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 919.62 Plumbing Supplies 33908 Sermon,Larsen&Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Dairy Producers$2.000 Transfer 33909 Snap On Industrial 300.35 Tools 33910 So.Cal.Gas Company 50.55 Natural Gas 33911 SoftChoice 10,510.63 Software 33912 Southern California Edison 26.04 Power 33913 Summit Steel 92.57 Metal 33914 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 33915 WEF 135.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 33916 Union Bank of California 24.104.86 Construction 11-17-3,Retention 33917 Nicholas J.Arhonles 768.48 Meetingrtralning Expense Reimbursement Page i of 7 Claims Paid From 02116/01 to 02128/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33918 Mark A.Tomko 721.89 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33919 Escrow Solutions 20,000.00 Construction 5-52 33920 RPI/Bio Gro 55.520.57 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 33921 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 120,830.92 Natural Gas-Spec.No.9900-28 33922 Commercial Resources Tax Group 25,250.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. _ 33923 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 53,815.20 Construction-Santa Ana River Joint Project 33924 Della Dental 47,426.26 Dental Insurance Plan 33925 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28,093.52 Medical Insurance Premium 33926 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 78,813.05 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 33927 Orange County Water District 68,129.28 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 33928 Pacific Investment Management Co. 136.068.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 33929 Palnewebber Incorporated 33,636.88 COP Remarketing Agreement 33930 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 345.022.47 Engineering Services J-42,J-35-1 33931 Synagro West, Inc. 121.666.09 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33932 Polydyne,Inc. 29,328.64 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 33933 Projects Partners 43.767.55 Temporary Employment Services 33934 Southern California Edison 52,962.72 Power 33935 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 111,861.73 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33936 Xerxes Corporation 35.543.19 Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic for Bleach Storage Tank 33937 Great American Printing Co. 173.72 Printing 33938 Agilenl Technologies,Inc. 2.061.63 Lab Supplies 33939 Air Products&Chemicals 24.143.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 33940 Airborne Express 45.23 Air Freight 33941 Airgas Safety 5,646.43 Safety Supplies 33942 American Amines 4,838.76 Travel Services 33943 Anthony Pest Control, Inc 295.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 33944 Appleone Employment Service 2,994.60 Temporary Employment Services 33945 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 526.00 Vacuum Truck Services 33946 Asbury Environmental Services 130.00 Waste Oil Removal 33947 AKM Consulting Engineers 3,379.71 Professional Services-11-20 33948 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 196.32 Telephone Service 33949 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 124.00 Telephone Service 33950 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 128.14 Cellular Telephone Service 33951 EIMCO/Baker Process 396.00 Restocking Charges 33952 Baltimore CIO KH.Wafts Co. 487.85 Electrical Supplies 33953 Bauer Compressors 7,338.13 Compressors 33954 BioMedeux Mtek,Inc. 516.36 Lab Supplies 33955 C.S.U.F. Foundation 9,550.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 33956 California Automatic Gate 4,484.75 Service Agreement 33957 Callen Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 33958 Cameron Welding Supply 448.82 Welding Equipment&Supplies 33959 Capital Westward 548.98 Mechanical Parts 33960 Carl R. Nelson,P.E. 2,400.00 Engineering Consultant 241 33961 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,032.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33962 Copeloo Capital, Inc. 1.279.23 Lease Agreement-Color Printer/Copier System 33963 Clickguard Corporation 221.42 Printer Service Agreement Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 02116101 to 02128101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33964 Compressor Components Of California 3,095.00 Mechanical Repairs 33965 Compusa.Inc. 216.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration 33966 Consolidated Elect. Distributors.Inc. 6,094.87 Elecuical Supplies 33967 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 20.10 Plumbing Supplies 33968 Cooper Energy Services 448.14 Engine Supplies 33969 County Wholesale Electric Co. 12.046.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33970 Cytec Industries 13,999.50 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 33971 CA Emissions Program 2.70 Vehicle Smog Testing 33972 CEM Corporation 802.25 Lab Supplies 33973 CH2M Hill 2,407.22 Professional Service-Odor Screening 33974 CMAA 100.00 Membership-Construction Management Association of America 33975 Computational Systems,Inc.(CSI) 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 33976 CWEA-SSCSC 140.00 O&M Training Registration-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 33977 CWEA Annual Conference 1,675.00 O&M Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 33978 CWEA-TCP 110.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 33979 Del Mar Analytical 596.00 Siosolids Analysis 33980 DeZudk C/O Misco/SouthWest 7,840.72 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33981 Digital Greffili 7,500.00 Client Server,Software License&Service Agreement 33982 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 665.16 Paint Supplies 33983 DGA Consultants, Inc 7.416.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 33984 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 39.99 Electrical Supplies 33985 Electra-Bond 4,785.36 Repairs&Maintenance 33986 Employment Development Dept. 924.00 State Unemployment Tan 33987 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 33988 Environmental Resource Association I ER 2,00T30 Lab Supplies 33989 Environmental Data Solutions Group 6,800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project 33990 FedEx Corporation 187.46 Air Freight 33991 CSC/Fibertron 3,464.35 Fiber Optic Equipment 33992 First American Real Estate Solutions 575.00 Orange County Property Information 33993 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 2,072.33 Lab Supplies 33994 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1.243.65 Pump Supplies 33995 Fountain Valley Camara 15.43 Photo Supplies 33996 Franklin Covey 60.52 Office Supplies 33997 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 232.74 Paint Supplies 33998 Pryor Seminars 39.D0 ESL Training Registration 33999 FWs Electronics 838.96 Computer Supplies 34000 G.E.Supply 87.30 Electric Parts 34001 Ganahl Lumber Company 7D0.04 Lumber/Hardware 34002 George Yardley Co. 395.76 Lab Supplies 34003 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 16,557.15 Pump Supplies 34004 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 34005 W W Grainger,Inc. 4.093.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34006 Graybar 179.28 Ins.Parts&Supplies 34007 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 235.10 Auto Repairs&Maintenance Service 34008 GBC(General Binding Corp) 105.92 Stationery It Office Suplies 34009 Edwards Systems Technology 108.58 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 02116101 to 02128/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34010 Verizon California 1,018.30 Telephone Services 34011 Haaker Equipment Company 83.81 Truck Supplies 34012 Penton Industries 1,213.25 Lab Supplies 34013 Halcyon Electric,Inc. 1,990.00 Construction-Exploratory Work Elecuical 34014 Harbour Engineering Group 1,076.00 Pump Supplies 34015 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 840.72 Plumbing Supplies 34016 Herbs Blackforest Bakery&Deli 435.00 Meeting Expenses 34017 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 20.034.30 Office Furniture&Equipment 34018 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 390.88 Compressor Pads 34019 The Holman Group 710.00 Employee Assistance Program Premium 34020 Home Depot 569.53 Small Hardware 34021 Hub Auto Supply 528.88 Truck Parts 34022 City of Huntington Beach 16,262.64 Water Use 34023 Huntington Supply Co., Inc. 170.36 Metal 34024 Hunts'Final Phase 3,850.00 Fiber Optic Potholing 34025 Idexx 5,160.00 Lab Supplies 34026 Imaging Plus, Inc. 2,432.9E Printing Service 34027 In Place Machining 10.440.00 Professional Services-OOSS Pump Seal Upgrade 34028 Industrial Distribution Group 4,190.17 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 34029 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 7,668.82 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34030 Infinity Technology USA 4,958.33 Computer Supplies 34031 Information Resources 200.00 Human Resources Service 34032 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 276.43 Lab Supplies 34033 IAPMO Publications 300.95 Publication 34034 IBM Corp. 6.064.45 IBM AS/400 Lease 34035 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 34036 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1.669.12 Instrument Supplies 34037 Jamison Engineering Contractor,Inc. 22,144.89 Construction-Drive Unit Replacement on Basin"I'" 34038 Jays Catering 2,539.85 Meeting Expenses 34039 Jim's Suspension Service 55.00 Truck Repair 34040 Johnstone Supply 889.42 Electrical Supplies 34041 JLM Contracting 2,460.88 Construction Service-Pipe Repair 34042 Kaman Industrial Technologies 5,005.47 Reliance Motor 34043 Kurz Instruments, Inc. 281.71 Electrical Maintenance&Repair 34044 Lab Support 1,602.50 Temporary Employment Services 34045 Lexis Publishing 317.61 Publication 34046 Gerald R.Jones 807.50 Professional Service-DART MO 942-99 34047 Lumi's 56.00 Meeting Expense 34048 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2,003.80 Mechanical Supplies 34049 Mc Junkin Corp—Orm no Branch 161.28 Plumbing Supplies 34050 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 257.47 Mechanical Supplies 34051 McRay Industries,Inc. 845.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 34052 Mee Analytical System 16,262.66 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 34053 Media Clips,Inc. 38.00 Notices 34054 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 3,DD0.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sirs Study 34055 MICMSeml 9,816.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/16/01 to 02/28/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34056 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10,026.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34057 Mission Uniform Service 2,748.97 Uniform Rentals 34058 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 34059 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 9,586.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 34060 MAG-TROL INC. 192.00 Electrical Supplies 34061 MAP 300.00 Management Consulting Service-Management Action Programs 34062 National Plant Services,Inc. 1,630.00 Vacuum Truck Services 34063 Neal Supply Co. 2,962.34 Plumbing Supplies 34064 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 1,946.17 Security System Maintenance 34065 City of Newport Beach 59.35 Water Use 34066 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 2,59&79 LubdcantfDiesel Fuel 34067 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 5,426.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO6-24-98 34068 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 34069 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,258.95 Office Supplies 34070 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 7.73 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34071 Optic Software 1,890.00 Software Maint. 34072 Orange County Water Association,Inc. 30.00 Membership 34073 Orange County Wimvater Works 1,184.60 Plumbing Supplies 34074 Oxygen Service Company 3.538.73 Specialty Gases 34075 OCS Reprogrephlca 4.520.48 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 34078 OCE-USA.Inc. 1,118.85 Computer Equipment Maint. 34077 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 978.85 Electrical Supplies 34078 Pacific Bell 1,122.30 Telephone Services 34079 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 34080 Pacific Mechanical Supply 351.19 Plumbing Supplies 34081 Parker Supply Company 128.59 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 34082 Perkhouse Tire Co. 287.41 Tires 34083 Petroleum Traders Corporation 9,326.92 Gasoline 34084 Power Measurement Limited 245.10 Digital Power Meter 34085 Propipe 450.00 CCTV Sawerline Inspection-2-41 34086 Pulsefeeder,Inc. 17,047.80 Pump Supplies 34087 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 5,946.87 Mechanical Supplies 34088 PAPA Seminars 110.00 O&M Training Registration 34089 PCS Express 37.50 Courier Service 34090 COS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 34091 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,0D0.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 34092 Ramoo Specially Products 140.75 Oil,Parts&Supplies 34093 Rolle-Royce Energy Systems, Inc. 2.390.15 Electrical Paris&Supplies 34094 RM Controls 47.62 Instrument Supplies 34095 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 3,020.00 Engineering Services-Additions to Fleet Services&Rebuild Shop 34096 RPM Electric Motors 344.00 Electrical Pans&Supplies 34097 Sceptre Advanced Business Solutions 3,024.00 Software Maint. 34098 Schenck Trebel 477.96 Mechanical Maint. 34099 Schwing America,Inc. 71.21 Pump Supplies 34100 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 1,013.00 Lab Equipment Pans&Service 34101 Sears Industrial Sales 81.86 Mechanical Supplies Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 02116101 to 02128/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34102 Sensotec,Inc. 268.85 Electrical Supplies 34103 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 10,000.00 Legal Services-2-41 Funding Alternatives 34104 Aldrich Chemical Co. 288.70 Lab Supplies 34105 SoftView Computer Products 698.64 Stationery&Office Supplies 34106 SoftChoice 15.30 Software 34107 Sperling Inst.C/O Patten Corporate 7,198.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34108 Spex Ceriprep,Inc. 462.50 Lab Supplies 34109 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 80.95 Pump Supplies 34110 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 6,967.08 Office Supplies 34111 Sunset Ford 76.62 Vehicle Supplies 34112 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,393.62 Mechanical Supplies 34113 Super Power Products 774.00 Janitorial Supplies 34114 Surveyor Services 86.34 Stationery&Office Supplies 34115 SARBSCWEA 20.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Assoc. 34116 SCTNA 75.00 Membership-So.Calif.Telecommunications Networking Assoc. 34117 SHRM 2D01 1,620.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration-Society for Human Resources Management 34118 Severn Trend Laboratories,Inc. 3,600.00 Lab Analytical Service 34119 T&C Industrial Controls,Inc. 245.93 Electrical Supplies 34120 Textile Engineering Associates 12,814.00 Belt Press Supplies 34121 The Foxboro Company 2,829.28 Instrument Supplies 34122 Thermo Forma Scientific 245.48 Lab Repairs&Maint. 34123 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 7,025.82 Mechanical Supplies 34124 Thyssen Dover Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 34125 Tierce Tractor 3,570.00 Tree Planting Services 34126 Tongs Lock&Safe Service&Sales 75.81 Locks&Keys 34127 Trade Service Corporation 2,06&36 Software Maint. 34128 The Trans Company 932.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 34129 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 568.93 Truck Supplies 34130 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 40.00 Lab Services 34131 Teksystems 6.739.00 Temporary Employment Services 34132 U.S.Geological Survey 1,050.00 Ocean Monitoring 34133 Ultra Scientific 230.58 Lab Supplies 34134 The Unisource Corporation 1,302.08 Office Supplies 34135 United Penal Service 653.80 Parcel Services 34136 UC Regents 477.56 Lab Analytical Service-Ocean Monitoring 34137 U-Uns 44.60 Office Supplies 34136 US Equipment Co., Inc 248.84 Drain Cleaning @ Pit.2 Air Compressor 34139 Industrial Air Compressor 1,509.10 Air Filter Elements 34140 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,801.72 Plumbing Supplies 34141 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 11,356.00 Temporary Employment Service 34142 Vapex, Inc. 3,250AS Electrical Parts&Supplies 34143 Vadan,Inc. 723.00 Lab Supplies 34144 Village Nurseries 52.46 Landscaping Supplies 34145 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,539.60 Door Repair 34146 Vulcan 24,001.33 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 34147 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,262.36 Lab Supplies Page 6of7 Claims Paid From 02116/01 to 02128101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 34148 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,154.60 Security Guards 34149 Waxie Sanitary Supply 170.23 Janitorial Supplies 34150 Western Industrial Supply 108.85 Door Repair 34151 Western Slates Chemical,Inc. 19,693.11 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 34152 White Cap Industries 141.40 Painting Supplies 34153 Xerox Corporation 4,013.35 Copier Leases 34154 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 16,740.00 Professional Services-FIS Upgrade 34155 The Yakima Company 9,655.09 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 34156 Daniel Cardona and Fry's Electronics 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 34157 Adrian Renescu 114.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 34158 Angela D.Bell 2,400.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 34159 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 645.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,755,466.73 Payroll Disbursements 22352-22468 Employee Paychecks $ 172.297.84 Biweekly Payroll 02/21/01 22469-22469 Interim Paycheck 1,634.05 Leave Payoff 58200-58651 Direct Deposit Statements 729.998.08 Biweekly Payroll 02/21/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 903.929.97 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA $251,035.10 February Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates cf Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 251.035.10 Total Claims Paid 02116/01 .07J2B/01 $ 3,910,431.80 Page 7 of 7 a a DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 28, 2001 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Don Hughes Peter Green,Vice Chair Tom Dawes Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Director Peer Swan Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Gerald Sigler, Director, Guest Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Directors Absent: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the January 24, 2001 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. r Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 c February 28, 2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode announced the CASA Spring conference at the Tenaya Lodge in Yosemite May 3-5. Director Gerald Sigler was the Chair's guest at the meeting. Chair Eckenrode mentioned that he had invited Mrs. Joan Irvine Smith,who has expressed an interest in the GWRS project, to attend the March 28Joint Boards meeting. At a prior meeting the idea of forming a consortium to consider ways for improving the San Gabriel River water quality and in turn the water quality at Seal Beach was presented. After checking around, it rums out that there a group has been formed to discuss these issues. Chair Eckenrode talked with Don McIntyre about including a Sanitation District representative. Staff will maintain contact with Mr. McIntyre and county staff on these issues. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the following issues: A. SARI Line Relocation Project Update Yorba Linda residents were briefed on the project and the need for easements for the first time last week. This has become more controversial than anticipated. Lisa Lawson addressed some of the concerns expressed by the homeowners at the February 21 meeting. A follow-up letter was sent to the attendees the day after the meeting providing additional Information and addressing their concerns. Because of the resistance, Dave Ludwin recommended that the agenda item on the easement appraisal procedure for acquisition of easements for SARI line relocation be pulled from the agenda to allow for additional consultation with the PDC Committee and the homeowners. General Counsel Tom Woodruff indicated that the condensed appraisal procedure that is proposed is allowed by law. Full appraisals would be very time consuming and expenses for underground easements that are estimated in value at about$1000 each. There are existing utility easements through the properties and the District's easement would be within the city's easement. Director Steve Anderson suggested placing survey staking along the alignment to assist the homeowners in identifying the exact location. B. GWRS Update Tom Dawes updated the Directors on the status of the project. There is a Joint Coordinating Committee (JCC)meeting on March 1 to discuss the results of the financial study. The Groundwater Producers have asked for clarification on several issues. The JCC will be recommending that the day-today management of the project be done by the JCC with delegation of powers to the Orange County Water District's (OCWD)Board. Two of the three directors from each • Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 28, 2001 agency would have to agree and the money for the Rem would have to be in the budget before it could be submitted to the OCWD's Board. Also, advance notification would be provided to the Sanitation District Board prior to action taking place. Mr. Dawes reported that project implementation Involves decisions on how to design, build and start the project. The consulting contract with CDM will be continued for final design. Should the Boards decide to approve the project on March 28, there are approximately another 12 smaller contracts that will be required to complete design. A separate third-party contract will be required for construction management. The fifth and final workshop will be held on Saturday, March 3 before the go/no- go decision on March 28. An overview of the project will be presented as well as updates on the financial study, governance and project Implementation. Director Peer Swan stated that there has only been two days to review the information submitted to the Groundwater Producers in response to their questions. He expressed concern about the process for approving change orders in amounts over existing delegations of authority. He stated that the CDM contract for final design was a non-competitive award that went against the originally approved process of having the design competitively bid. Mr. Anderson responded that the JCC has asked staff to provide a number of alternatives for setting limits on change orders and that the Sanitation District's own delegation of authority procedure will be one alternative proposed. Mr. Dawes explained the actions over the last six to eight months during preliminary design. He also stated that there were no restrictions to not allow an extension of the CDM contract for final design. Mr. Anderson said that the JCC discussed the issues extensively and agreed with this action. Director Pat McGuigan questioned the amount of time the JCC would be the governing entity. Mr. Dawes said that the JCC would continue overseeing the project with the existing set of rules in the interim until the final rules are approved by both Boards, and would continue governing under the final rules. A full board of directors is required for approvals and the JCC will be recommending that this authority be delegated to OCWD as they meet twice a month. Additional recommendations will be presented to the JCC and the Boards on how change orders would be handled before finalizing the final rules. C. Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli updated the committee on the County's Watershed Management Program. A core workgroup has been formed to work with the action plan that follows up on the Phase 1 reports. Twenty different areas will be reviewed. The County is trying to obtain Proposition 13 funding. Minutes of the Stewing Committee Page 4 ., February 28,2001 OCSD's Summer Monitoring Program is being designed by a technical advisory committee in a series of meetings. Agreement has been reached on the study design and the details are being finalized. Cost for the monitoring program and the study will be about$1 million. Staff Is also looking at applying for Proposition 13 funding for these efforts. The Directors questioned whether the USC SeaGrant report will duplicate our efforts. Staff has only just become aware of this project and will be contacting USC for more information. AES, the operators of the power plant across from Huntington Beach, have applied for a fast-track permit to double their capacity. In the hearings the issue of beach contamination was raised. AES has agreed to work with the District during the monitoring period to help duplicate conditions, as well as our assisting with ocean testing when they operate at full capacity. AES is preparing a white paper on their testing and will be doing modeling on their outfall area. The county will be testing the Talbert Marsh and the Santa Ana River parallel with our studies. A technical advisory team has been formed and separate meetings are being held to discuss nine topics of concern. The media has shown no interest in this process. Jim Herberg reported that a study has been included in next year's budget to consider pathogen reduction. D. Seattle Earthquake Blake Anderson reported that staff contacted Seattle Metro to see how their facilities fared during today's 6.8 magnitude earthquake. Their Emergency Response Center, which is similar to the District's,was activated and it went surprisingly smooth. No major damage was reported. E. Storm Flows Mr. Anderson reported that during the recent rains, the peak was about 100 mgd greater than usual. There were no problems. F. Dairy Dewatering Ponds Today, the first of several dairies ponds was connected to the SARI to allow dewatering the ponds before rain events. This is a 'first'in the country and will help to control dairy pondwater from entering the stormwater systems. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that the dry weather discharge agreement between The Irvine Company, IRW D and OCSD for the Crystal Cove area has been finalized and a letter sent to the Coastal Commission. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 February 28, 2001 Mr. Woodruff also discussed a memo in the Directors'folders regarding legal representation on a claim for reimbursement for expenses involved in moving a sewer in Ball Road at the request of the City of Anaheim to accommodate their storm drain. There is a meeting scheduled Thursday, March 1, to discuss the Crow-Winthrop claim. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-F) A. Local Sewer Service Agreement between IRW D and OCSD for Irvine Business Complex Area and Tustin Marine Corps Redevelopment Area. Jim Herberg explained the proposed terms of the agreement to the Directors. These areas are currently within Revenue Area 7 and the agreement will move them to Revenue Area 14, thereby allowing IRW D to take over the local sewer service. The Directors authorized negotiations. B. Streamlining Concepts: Can we reduce the paper work between staff and board committees. Greg Mathews and Blake Anderson discussed several examples of ways to reduce time and paperwork for both the staff and the Directors. It was decided that the financial report could be presented quarterly. Additional changes will be presented to the committee for review at a later meeting. C. Consider 4 p.m. start time for March 28 Steering Committee. Because of the early start for the March 28 Joint Boards meeting with OCWD,the Steering Committee will meet at 4 p.m. that day. D. Resolve July Committee meeting date calendars. The July 4 holiday Impacts the OMTS and PDC Committees meeting dates and the Directors agreed not to meet in July. There will be meetings in August,which is usually dark. A determination to hold the FAHR Committee meeting in July was not finalized. E. Summer Program for Disadvantaged Youth. Blake Anderson introduced an idea that was presented by one of our employees on employing disadvantaged youths in our summer program. He outlined some of the questions that need to be answered as well as some of the conditions for employment, but asked the Directors for direction. Supervisor Silva said he would hope that OCSD could be used as a model for developing a program that could be used throughout County government. The Directors gave their support, and felt that it would be a very worthwhile,and much-needed, program. F. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in March. These Items were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Steve Anderson asked about removing the PDC Committee's GWRS project item from the Board agenda. It was decided that it could be pulled as no action was required by the Board at this time. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 6 ° February 28, 2001 (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at4 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. This will be a joint meeting with the Orange County Water District Board to consider proceeding with the Groundwater Replenishment System project. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m. Submitted by: Tappan t Bring Committee Secretary G%wft1pHgB1$tmft CaTT91<Otlf�022WI X MAMe$.b STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting Date To3tsas 031zarot 3/zeiot AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item11(c) r Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator: Lisa Tomko, Director, Human Resources and Employee Development SUBJECT: Reaffirm the Charter of the FAHR Committee with Regard to Labor Negotiations GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Reaffirm the Charter of the FAHR Committee with regard to Labor Negotiations SUMMARY Within the last eighteen months the District concluded labor negotiations with the Orange County Employees Association (OCEA), International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501 and the Supervisor and Professionals Management Team (SPMT). The contract duration for both the OCEA and Local 501 is three years. These agreements both expire in 2002. The contract duration for the SPMT is one year. This agreement will expire on June 30, 2001. Recently, members of the FAHR committee requested that the charter of the FAHR Committee be revisited before the upcoming negotiations begin. The Committee's specific concern relates to its role in the meet-and-confer process and the Committee's ongoing direction to staff and consultants. The Director's handbook states that the FAHR Committee "...recommends policies and procedures regarding personnel, labor negotiations, insurers and coverage, procurement procedures and other related activities as needed or appropriate". Tonight the FAHR Committee is seeking direction from the Steering Committee and the Board regarding the extent of its role in labor relations in anticipation of pending negotiations with the SPMT. From the point of view of staff and the General Manager, it appears to make the most sense for the existing charter of the FAHR to remain as it was originally envisioned in 1994. At that time, then-Chair John Cox, Peer Swan and others conceived of the three-committee system we use today. Each committee has a distinct and logical charter for developing and proposing policy matters that are subsequently approved by the entire Board. Having each committee with specific jurisdictional responsibilities gives staff the advantage of being to work closely, efficiently and effectively with its governing board. The focus our three- committee system provides has given the committees the opportunity to achieve G:1".y.dua gengal td Ageno Repo ls=01 Rw,n Agcnda RCp 5% ID1111em 11(c)dw Page 1 timely consensus and given staff the ability to execute timely action. In the case of labor negotiations, where the clock is always running, timeliness has great value. With respect to jurisdictional responsibility, it makes sense that labor negotiation responsibilities remain with the FAHR. It is at this committee that all other matters related to budget, staffing, and human resource policies are developed. The Steering Committee has interest in some of these issues (as well as it does with certain operational and capital projects matters). But its discussions are more general and overarching and often are the precursor to the deeper and more substantive discussions that occur within the three committees. As has been its practice in the past, the Steering Committee may elect to provide advice and general direction to the FAHR Committee on matters related to labor negotiations. But in the end, it appears to staff that details and negotiating parameters will emerge from the FAHR Committee, as has happened so effectively over the last six years. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES The Steering Committee could elect to take on the responsibility of directing meet and confer activities. Either as a committee of the whole or by forming an ad hoc subcommittee, the Steering Committee could provide direction to staff and to seek approval from the full board. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A Ghp.EicNpe^EaBosO nymea Re�tS3COt emo nymu lilpMb'UT IVIlm 11�[�ax Page 2 1 Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2001 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 7, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Don Bankhead Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Tony Kawashima Mike Moore, ECM Manager Anna Piercy Ed Torres, Air Quality and Special Projects Manager Paul Walker Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Services Manager Directors Absent: Marc Dubois, Contracts/Purchasing Manager Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist Mark A. Murphy Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Others Present: Jim Sullivan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 March 7, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the February 7, 2001 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair reminded the Directors that the OMTS Committee would be dark in July and would meet on August 1, 2001. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on a 4.5-mile portion of the Santa Ana Relocation Interceptor project within the city of Yorba Linda. Staff is reviewing potential alternatives to leave portions of the line in the river and protect it with sediment stabilizers and other methods. Mr. Anderson also reported he and Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, recently attended a city council meeting in Yorba Linda to monitor concerns of citizens with regard to the impacts of the proposed project. The city council approved sending a letter of opposition to the project to OCSD's board. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology, Patrick Miles, reported staff is now posting agendas, minutes and agenda reports of the Board of Directors meetings, as well as agendas and minutes only of the committee meetings on the District's website. Mr. Miles also reported on a pilot project for an online timecard system. The project has run into some technical difficulties and staff is hopeful the vendor will be able to correct the problems in the near future. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported additional information was Included in the monthly report: an odor complaint section, and financial information that summarizes his department's major projects. He further reported that chemical usage Is up, primarily due to changed odor control strategy due to the number of odor complaints received over the summer. It was also noted that his department was approximately 5% over budget for this time of year primarily due to biosolids, chemicals and natural gas. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported the first dairy was connected to the Santa Ana River Interceptor. This is a pilot project approved about 18 months ago to capture the dairy washwater during times of heavy rains. This is a major accomplishment towards the District's watershed goals. It was further reported that a dry weather urban runoff agreement was finalized with IRWD. While finalizing the agreement, however, It was noted that the District's policy needed to be revised with regard to the indemnification language. - Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance 9 and Technical Services Committee Page 3 March 7, 2001 A motion was then moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize adding Item No. 14 to the Agenda to consider Resolution No. OCSD 01- , Establishing Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy. The need for action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (14) OMTS01-14: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-_, Establishing Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 00-22, incorporating amendments to the indemnification language. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS01-08 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to award a sole source purchase order to Taylor-Dunn, Inc, for Purchase of 17 Electric Carts, Specification No. V-015,for a total amount not to exceed $124,200.00 including sales tax; and (2)Authorize the District to recognize Taylor-Dunn, Inc.as the District's standard and sole manufacturer for future electric cart purchases without further Board approval. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS01-09 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize staff to enter into negotiations with Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR)to produce Class A biosolids product(s)and to acquire from ICOR an interest in their production facility. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTS01-10 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award a contract for the Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite, Specification No. C-148, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $400,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. r Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee t Page 4 March 7, 2001 d. OMTS01-11 Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-01)for an Increase in unit cost from $265.00 per ton to$462.00 per ton, increasing the total amount not to exceed $756,300; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-01)for an increase in unit cost from $462.00 per ton to$515.00 per ton, effective April 1, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $850,000, if needed. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors,and to authorize staff to request bids for a new contract for the Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution (Specification No. C-150). (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS01-12 Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM)of sanitary sewer systems Nick Arhontes gave a brief updated report on the CMOM program. b. OMTS01-13 Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli reported the Technical Advisory Committee for the Phase III Huntington Beach investigation was scheduled to meet again on March 12 and March 16 and that progress was being made toward development of a final study plan for the summer work. It was also reported that funding was being pursued, in cooperation with the county of Orange, through the water bond and $100 million set aside in the Governor's budget. Contact has also been made with Congressman Rohrabacher's office seeking help to locate federal funding for the project. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. l Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance 1 and Technical Services Committee Page 5 March 7, 2001 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:17p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. le , Operations, Mainten ce and Technical Services Committee Secretary G:\wp.ots1agenoa\0MTS1200112001 OMTS MinuteM030701 minutes.00c OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 3/07/01 3/28/01 T" AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS01-08 12(c) Orange County Sanitation District - FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Nick Arhontes, Manager Facilities Maintenance Services SUBJECT: SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC CARTS PER SPECIFICATION V-015 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: (1) Authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to award a sole source purchase order to Taylor-Dunn Inc., of Anaheim for seventeen electric carts for a total amount not to exceed $124,200.00 including sales tax as authorized by Section 3.17 of District Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. (2) Authorize the District to recognize Taylor-Dunn as the District's standard and sole manufacturer for future purchases as authorized by Section 3.17 of District Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. SUMMARY: The District owns and operates 142 electric carts from three different manufacturers for on-site employee transportation and cargo hauling. The electric cart inventory will, with the proposed purchase, consist of 130 Taylor-Dunn carts, 6 EZ-GO carts and 6 Nordscog carts. Staff recommends a sole source purchase of 17 Taylor-Dunn electric carts to replace existing vehicles at the end of their useful life. At present, only Taylor- Dunn and EZ-GO meet the District's electric cart specifications. Industrial electric carts for staff and cargo carriers have been successfully used on site for over 25 years. Experience with several brands has indicated that Taylor-Dunn manufactures and provides product support in a manner consistent with our life cycle asset management criteria. This criteria focuses on superior design that allows lowest possible recurring maintenance labor inputs, low parts consumption, high reliability, strong product support and supplier longevity. Staff is recommending the sole source purchase of the carts for the following reasons: 1. In 1998, staff did a five-year life cycle cost comparison evaluation of Taylor- Dunn and EZ-GO electric carts. Although the Taylor-Dunn carts are slightly more expensive, the higher repair cost of the EZ-GO unit including the added labor, made the lifecycle cost of the Taylor-Dunn equipment more cost- effective. 2. Warehousing cost, space and labor needed to keep track of more than one type of equipment adds to overall cost. At present, Taylor-Dunn spare parts inventory value is about$6,000. With the focus on Taylor-Dunn equipment, all other electric cart spare parts are being phased out of the inventory system. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repons\2001 Board Agenda Repods\0301\Item 12(c).doc sa„,r,.V1840 Page 1 3. District purchasing staff have negotiated the cart cost to ensure the costs are fair. The purchasing staff have compared the costs to the State of California government bids for electric carts, the federal GSA bid or published costs, and have reviewed past electric cart purchase prices. The costs being offered are at the federal cost and slightly lower than costs for previous electric cart purchases. 4. Taylor-Dunn has been located in Orange County for 50 years, has promptly delivered parts, provides spare parts discounts generally at 15 percent, will continue to provide on-site factory training to staff, and has no spare part freight charges. They also have an adequate stock of spare parts, which allows the District to keep a reduced inventory. This recommendation has been reviewed and approved by the District's purchasing manager and legal counsel. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY: N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000-01 Budget, Section 8 - Page 188 under Division 430 line items) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted as a lease, but operating funds exist. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Contact Nick Arhontes at: (714) 593-7210 or e-mail at: narhontes@ocsd.com ALTERNATIVES: N/A CEQA FINDINGS: N/A ATTACHMENTS: OMTS Committee Agenda Report OMTS-0046 -Overview of Fleet Services Practices NJA:pjm eivALla�np F¢puu 'e .npvaa ReCW`aS11Yem tzlclas G9wp.dla(agendMBoard Agenda Repom\2001 Board Agenda Reportslmo111tem 12(c).doc RM 411M Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date Toed.of Dir. 12 06,00 AGENDA REPORT OM mNumbumber I[em Numbe O6 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Nick Arhontes, Manager, Facilities Maintenance SUBJECT: Overview of Fleet Management Practices GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Information Only SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to update the OMTS Committee on the mission, goals and objectives of the Fleet Services business unit of the Operations and Maintenance Department. The overall mission of this business unit within the Facilities Maintenance Division (430) is to provide cost-effective and reliable maintenance services in support of the District's ongoing vehicle operation, maintenance, purchasing, and special- equipment needs for the 522 equipment items for which it is responsible. The District's fleet consists of the following types of equipment and rolling stock: Light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks (including three Ford EV Rangers) Sedans Mobile and stationary truck and trailer-mounted emergency generators Electric carts Mobile and stationary air compressors A mobile office for emergencies A tour bus Bicycles Heavy equipment including: Two tractors Various sized cranes A skip loader Forklifts Sewer cleaning trucks The business unit consists of a Fleet Supervisor, a lead mechanic, four senior mechanics, three heavy-equipment operators, and one senior mechanic assigned to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) support group, who also supports other division needs. The goals of the business unit are to provide a high degree of customer satisfaction, low operation costs, high equipment reliability and availability though proper maintenance, regulatory compliance, and a comprehensive workplace safety program. GW dlMpeMMOMTSr]O[01 N*ft xZOMTSWAG Ox R.—.. � Page 1 As part of a review of the business unit objectives to provide cost-effective service, the District conducted an internal study in 1997 to evaluate its overall efficiency. This study resulted in the elimination of underused and high-maintenance equipment, future downsizing of staff as appropriate, and a streamlining of maintenance activities through the CMMS. In addition, new procurement policies and standards were put into effect because of new maintenance guidelines and new South Coast Air Quality Management Division (SCAQMD) regulations, and cross-training policies for equipment operators were implemented. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION We employ the following strategies and practices to meet the above goals and objectives. Customer Satisfaction Every two years, staff develops a customer survey to monitor progress in this area. We track issues related to vehicle reliability, safety, availability, function and service responsiveness. Past surveys indicate a high degree of customer satisfaction. Suggestions for improvement are evaluated, and implemented as possible. This process helps our staff feel more directly responsible to our customers for the quality of our work, and keeps us appraised of how we're doing. Low Operation Costs The keys to success here include correct equipment selection, tight specifications for specialized equipment, proper and timely preventive maintenance, keeping a fleet and motor pool of minimal but adequate size, and retiring vehicles and equipment at the end of their useful life. Staff selects equipment by communicating directly with our customers and assessing their needs. This has helped us standardize specifications for most electric carts, sedans, pick-up trucks and most of our heavy-duty maintenance trucks. c we mwsa,a.wmms�zoovwsa�a•rsa�nnourtsoo<s w= Aa,.a_ a B Page 2 Pick-ups and sedans are available from the motor pool for agency-wide use through a reservation and checkout system. An adequate inventory is also maintained to provide back-up vehicles for use when assigned vehicles are in for service. Sedans are available for use by staff for District business, though all vehicles are not used every hour or every day. Specifications for sedans and pick-ups are based on common minimum industry standards. Specifications for specialized vehicles and equipment are more rigorous to ensure high reliability and low maintenance costs. Fleet and motor pool size is directly tied to the District's mission and the various business unit's changing needs. Vehicles are rented, as needed, rather keeping a larger inventory of vehicles with limited use. Since 1997, we have taken a more critical view of fleet size and utilization. Many underutilized items have been eliminated and older equipment requiring higher levels of maintenance has been removed from the fleet. A total of 62 vehicles and equipment have been removed from service since April of 1997. Older vehicles and equipment are turned over to Purchasing / Contracts for sale at public auctions. Funds from auction proceeds are returned to the general fund. No separate vehicle replacement fund has been established as yet. Using the CMMS, staff has developed a new quarterly reporting mechanism for tracking equipment condition, total miles driven and the projected fiscal year in which the vehicle is to be replaced. New vehicles or equipment are budgeted along with other capital equipment during the annual budget preparation process. Expansion of fleet size is subject to approval by the Department Heads based only on changing mission needs. District staff members using their own vehicles for District business are reimbursed at the IRS published rate per mile. Maintenance and Reliability Vehicle and equipment maintenance is performed according to manufacturers recommendations, staff experience and expertise, and special equipment needs, if any. The CMMS system is helping us improve asset management and task allocation planning and reporting. Cost information sharing is now being integrated with our Financial Information System (FIS) database. Vehicles are kept for 10 years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first. These service life-cycle intervals are well within the guidelines used by other cities and agencies in our area. Heavy-duty trucks last longer, and with proper maintenance and operation, do not have to adhere to the above retirement guidelines. Availability of replacement parts for older specialized equipment is a major factor in deciding whether to keep such equipment. Customers who have high-mileage job duties have access to the newest equipment. Older equipment with low mileage may be rotated into a high-mileage application with the approval of the Fleet Supervisor. This allows the optimum number of vehicles reaching the mileage limit at the ten-year life cycle. G:kv d,a�ffe aWMTSVU 90nda PeN NOMTSWAGEoc aa,... mm9 Page 3 Regulatory Compliance Regulatory compliance requires significant staff attention. SCAQMD mandates and proposed rule making efforts are closely followed. Our fleet staff works closely with the District's Air Quality and Special Projects Division's to monitor these trends. AQMD regulations affect many aspects of vehicle selection, care, and condition monitoring. The District receives internal and external compliance audits governing record keeping, solvent usage, paints, emissions testing and certification, fuels, and fuel dispensing. Orange County Health Care Agency regulations govern fuel storage and fuel tank leak- detection systems. Fleet staff has held open houses to show regulators how we implement best management practices to minimize the environmental impacts of our fleet operations. New SCAQMD emissions requirements have caused us to reevaluate our policies for specifying new equipment. The following internal standards are now in place: • Pedal power or bicycles for in-plant transit where cargo or tools are not carried • Electric carts have replaced gasoline-fueled small trucks for in-plant tasks and uses by many divisions • Three battery-powered compact pick-ups (Ford EV Rangers) were obtained recently for in-plant, between plant and short trip local uses by staff • Several compressed natural gas (CNG) fueled pick-ups are on order to replace older gasoline-fueled trucks. A few CNG units are in the fleet now and customer acceptance and reliability have been high. We are also waiting for an opportunity to test the new hybrid vehicles being developed by Toyota and Honda. These vehicles currently use an unleaded gasoline-fueled engine that drives a generator to keep a battery system charged while you drive. This eliminates the need to stop and re-charge. Staff currently feels that a mix of hybrid and electric vehicles will be well suited to our needs. Larger trucks will continue to use unleaded gasoline. Recent new national and local regulations will make it very restrictive to use diesel-fueled on-road vehicles. This will affect diesel fleet operations of at least fifteen units or more. We are assessing their impact at this time to guide future procurement, and are evaluating converting of diesel- fueled vehicles to CNG as possible. Funding from SCAQMD or EPA will be sought. The business unit also operates under the California Highway Patrol's Biennial Terminal Inspection Program covering fleet vehicles over ten thousand It0,000) pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) and their operators along with other criteria. We have always passed these audits with no negative findings. Forward Plan Our forward plan will be to use our improved databases to make better decisions relating to the following: • More efficient maintenance planning • Projected staffing needs • Improved training and cross training • Equipment useful life analysis based on a cost and market value model ovm.durpdmewnnsmomnae,aa Raadd•Iaxrsdo d. R.Ind. MM Page 4 Expected operational and capital needs for equipment replacement on a fifteen- year forecast. V We will also continue to focus on more networking with private firms and public agencies to guide adopting "best practice" methods. As more data is added to the District's web site, we can share and compare data, specifications and practices with other fleet professionals outside of our service area. The five-year staffing plan being developed will address expected staffing needs based on current business unit assumptions, including maintaining a modern fleet to minimize maintenance tasks. Future Operations and Maintenance Department annual reports will be expanded to include the above information and will provide additional performance-based information. The proposed annual budget will affirm or modify the vehicle and fleet service equipment replacement policy as necessary. Directors having questions, comments and suggestions for improvements in our program are invited to contact us at any time. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None G Pm.dWaq Be MTSVWLMg ReMMMOrtsaoedM R.W: Raoge Page 5 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.ofoir. 3/07/01 3128/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number OMTS01-09 12fd) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne Baroldi, Sr. Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: NEGOTIATIONS WITH INLAND COMPOSTING AND ORGANIC RECYCLING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into negotiations with Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR) to produce Class A biosolids product(s) and to acquire from ICOR an interest in the production facility. SUMMARY Recently enacted county bans on the land application of Class B biosolids' have resulted in decreased capacity and increased costs to manage biosolids in California. The viability of the land application of Class B biosolids beyond January 2003 is in serious doubt. These regulatory developments demand that the District take immediate action to insure reliable long-term biosolids management options. It is clear that any long-term sustainable biosolids management program supporting biosolids recycling must be flexible and based on producing Class A biosolids products. Staff is requesting that the District's Board of Directors (Board) authorize staff to enter into negotiations with biosolids management firm(s) in order to insure that the District has a reliable, diversified, cost-effective and sustainable biosolids management program. Staff proposes that the District's biosolids management program include the continued land application of Class B biosolids for a minimum of two years, utilization of composting and chemical stabilization to manufacture Class A biosolids, and the development of an on-site chemical stabilization process on the District's Kings County property. To achieve this goal of producing Class A biosolids products in the limited time available, funding of a minimum of$20 million is recommended in order to pursue a public/private partnership interest in a compost and/or a chemical stabilization facility. Securing capacity at a site that can produce Class A biosolids products will provide the District with insurance that its biosolids will be managed in an environmentally safe and cost-effective manner while providing the District with a secure inclement weather biosolids management site. Definitions of Class B,Class A.and Exceptional Quality(EQ)Biosolids can be found at the end of this Agenda Report. Page 1 } Background Recent events throughout California have resulted in significant concern over the long-term reliability of the District's current biosolids management program. In spite of the adoption of a statewide permitting system supporting the land application of Class B biosolids in California, a number of counties have developed or are in the process of developing their own restrictive biosolids ordinances. These County biosolids ordinances range from those dwindling few counties that allow for Class B biosolids to be land applied, to those that allow only Class A biosolids, to complete bans on all forms of bulk biosolids. As a result of these regulatory developments, Class B biosolids reuse options and capacities for the management of District's biosolids are becoming insufficient. The District currently land applies 100% of its biosolids in Kings, Kern, Riverside, and San Diego counties through contracts with three biosolids management service providers. Land application of Class B biosolids may not be allowed in these counties beyond early 2003. The Kern County and Kings County bans require that the District produce Class A biosolids within two years and Riverside County may not be far behind. In anticipation of these regulatory developments, the District's Strategic Plan recommended that staff commence assessment of other biosolids processing technologies and management alternatives, and purchase biosolids permitted land. The District purchased 1,808 acres in Kings County with the capacity to manage up to 25% of the District's biosolids production in order to add security to its biosolids management program. Staff and legal counsel is negotiating with Kings County to maintain the viability of Class B biosolids land application on this site beyond 2003. District's staff is concerned over the availability of additional management options for the remaining 75% of the District's biosolids. Unfortunately, the Strategic Plan did not provide clear direction in selecting the appropriate alternative biosolids management option(s)that are necessary to secure a diverse biosolids management program for all of the District's biosolids. District's staff is reviewing several biosolids management technologies to address our needs to achieve Class A biosolids within the next two years. Compost Based on recent experience in Kern and Kings Counties, Class A biosolids compost is an accepted form of biosolids-derived product that addresses local public perception concerns. Staff is proposing that the Board authorize staff to enter into negotiations to acquire an interest in a composting facility to produce Class A biosolids. Production of Class A biosolids compost will provide a sustainable and cost-effective management option for the District. An interest in such a compost facility would secure capacity to process the District's biosolids utilizing the most acceptable biosolids management option currently available. Page 2 b / Development of a suitable composting facility will require significant efforts and funding to select and acquire a site that is acceptable from a public perception, safety, operational, and environmental viewpoint. Operational concerns including the design and permitting of the facility are critical to the success of a compost facility. The design criteria for the establishment of a biosolids composting facility requires adequate vacant land in an area zoned M-1 (light industrial) or M-2 (heavy industrial). The composting facility should be able to process a minimum of 550 wet tons per day of biosolids (100% of the District's daily production) and approximately 1,000 tons per day of other feedstocks in order to obtain the proper carbon to nitrogen composting ratio. The facility will require structures and equipment for grinding and mixing of the feedstocks and placement into windrow or static pile composting configurations. The design criteria will have to ensure that the compost meets temperature and time requirements for the destruction of pathogens. The finished product will be tested and stored on site for eventual sale as a soil amendment and other uses. District's staff screened six potential composting sites in order to determine the District's budget needs. These sites include two existing facilities, San Joaquin Composting (Kem County)and Synagro's "Recyc" Composting Facility (Western Riverside County), and four proposed facilities, Westlake Farms (Kings County), Yakima (Kings County), Inland Composting and Organic Recycling (ICOR) (San Bernardino County/ City of Colton), and Tule Ranch (Kings County). Initial screening of these sites addressed key criteria including proximity to residential areas and sensitive land uses, adjacent landowners and noise considerations, ability to buffer, existence of sensitive or endangered species, land costs, land topography, proximity to major roads and ease of access, availability of utilities, composting technologies, land availability in relation to site size needed, land use restrictions and zoning, ability to permit the site, proximity to product markets and feedstock supplies, and the ability to manage flood and stormwater. The leading candidate for the proposed compost facility, and the site that will be used as a basis for determining this budget request, is ICOR, a 72-acre site located in the City of Colton near Riverside Drive and north of the Santa Ana River. The site is currently zoned for light industrial and heavy industrial and is suitable for composting biosolids. The site is designed to process 750 tons per day of biosolids (85% of the District's estimated biosolids production in 2020 according to Scenario 1 of the Strategic Plan). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The following preliminary budget estimates for the major elements of a compost facility are based on Inland Composting and Organic Recycling's (ICOR) model: Page 3 Major Category Totals (does not include contingency costs): • Site Preparation & Grading: $ 5,921,690.00 • Sanitary Sewers: 37,900.00 • Water Distribution: 299,390.00 • Storm Drainage: 442,920.00 • Roadway/Street Improvements: 1,550,415.00 • Utilities: 245,700.00 • Amenities & Special Construction: 689,500.00 • Consultant Fees & Services: 758,300.00 • Fees, Additional Permits, Etc.: 65,200.00 Total Cost Without Contingencies: $10,011,015.00 Summary (including contingency costs): • Total Costs Subject To Contingency: $ 9,181,515.00 • Contingencies @ 10%: 918,151.00 • Costs Not Subject To Contingency: 829,500.00 Total Probable Construction Cost: $10,929,166.00 All of the development costs are subject to change in conformity to the final conditions of the Full Facility Permit that will be issued jointly by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). This estimate is exacting and includes all of the costs for berms that will protect the site from a 100-year 48-hour storm event. Build the facility in accordance with the Conditional Use Permit from the City of Colton and as described by the project in the Environmental Impact Report. ICOR has $2.1 million dollars of equipment currently in operation, and will transfer all of these implements to the new facility. Additional equipment costs will include windrow turners, front-end loaders with 'tink' buckets and tractor- trailers. All of these additional pieces of machinery may be available from existing inventory of ICOR or as used equipment and may cost an additional $2 million dollars, but should be the responsibility of ICOR to finance and acquire as needed from its operating funds, without additional expense to the District. Total preliminary (non-negotiated) costs for acquisition, development, and operation of the Facility are: Land (Site) $ 4,000,000.00 10% interest in AMRF, LLP' Development $ 10,929,166.00 30% interest in ICOR, Inc. Land (Buffer) $ 4,500,000.00 100% of 58 acres of buffer land Total $ 19,929,166.00 (Subject to negotiations) 'The/COR compost IadNty pmperty owner is Aeaa Manse River Farms(AMRF,UP),a Calilomie Limiloe Liaeildy Padnership. Page 4 Depending on the compost facility site chosen for development, significant additional facility enclosure cost may be incurred. Such cost may be in excess of $20 million. The estimated annual management cost(not including the capital expense or profit rebate)would be $29 per wet ton of biosolids utilizing ICOR, or$5.3M per year if 500 wet tons of biosolids per day were managed at ICOR. The estimated annual cost to utilize a distant compost facility is $35 per wet ton of biosolids, or $6.4M per year to manage 500 wet tons of biosolids per day. In round numbers, this translates into an 18-year payback on the District's investment. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item#86 Joint Operating Fund budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES Only a few viable alternatives exist for long-term sustainable biosolids management other than composting. Specifically, landfilling, chemical stabilization / heat drying, and land application of Class B biosolids in Arizona. Energy costs for natural gas and electricity is making heat less economically viable. High diesel fuel costs is also making the transportation costs for landfilling and /or land application in Arizona prohibitive. The lack of recycling and the increasing "tip fees" associated with disposal of the District's biosolids also make landfilling less attractive. These biosolids management options are estimated to cost in excess of$40 per wet ton of biosolids. Composting is expected to cost -$28 per wet ton (excluding capital costs) and chemical stabilization is expected to cost-$32 per wet ton. Current Class B biosolids management cost approximately$26 per wet ton during dry weather and $36 per ton during wet weather. A "do nothing" alternative would result in the District continuing to utilize land application of Class B biosolids as its only biosolids management practice. The District would be relying on county regulations to allow for the continued acceptance of Class B land application in order to successfully manage its biosolids. The imminent bans on Class B biosolids in Kem, Kings, and possibly Riverside Counties make utilizing the "do nothing" alternative unacceptable. CEQA FINDINGS Depending on the project, appropriate CEOA review will have to be performed. Page 5 ATTACHMENTS - LB:vvh G]wp.dlaragendMBoard Agenda Report512001 Board Agenda Reportst0301gtem 12(d).doc DEFINITIONS: Class B biosolids are blosolids that have been processed to achieve a significant pathogen reduction(e.g., using anaerobic digestion as performed at the District)and meets vector attraction reduction requirements. Class A biosolids are biosolids that have been further processed(e.g.,composting)In order to meet the most stringent pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. EC biosolids are Class A biosolids that meet the most stringent limits for pollutant concentrations. Pathogens are disease-causing organisms,such as certain bacteria,viruses,and parasites(e.g., salmonella,fecal colifoml). Vectors are organisms,such as rodents and Insects that can spread disease by carrying and transferring pathogens. • Expectation of a minimum of 15%of the final products to be used within District's service area Page 6 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeb ?Dete Toll%= 3/]/Ol 3/28/Ol AGENDA REPORT 11ei1N1inbe tanNinib- OFn501-10 I](e) orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator. Mark Esquer, Manager of Process Engineering Ed Torres, Manager of Air Quality and Special Projects SUBJECT: ESTABLISH A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-148, FOR DISINFFECTION AND ODOR CONTROL IN THE TREATMENT PLANTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Contracts/Purchasing Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award a contract for the Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite, Specification No. C-148, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $400,000. SUMMARY The District uses bleach in the wastewater treatment process and must establish a new contract for purchase of this chemical. Staff is preparing bid packages in order to complete this work. As information, the District competitively bid the bleach contract under Specification No. C-040 and awarded the said contract to Western States, Inc. for a one-year contract renewable for four additional years. The District has exercised all of Us renewal actions. The current contract will end May 13, 2001. Bleach is used for the following purposes in the treatment plants: 1) Disinfecting the plant water. Plant water is the secondary effluent that is used in various areas of the plant for washing, cooling and pump seal purposes. 2) Controlling certain bacteria in the activated sludge plant process. 3) In foul air scrubbers for odor control. As mentioned, bleach is used in foul air scrubbers to control hydrogen sulfide emissions and prevent odor complaints from the neighbors. Odor complaints have increased over the last several months, so staff commissioned an odor study to determine the best overall strategy for controlling plant odors. The odor study, performed as part of the Odor Facilities Rehabilitation Project, recommends that the District increase bleach usage to further reduce foul air scrubber hydrogen sulfide emissions. This corrective action will reduce neighbor odor complaints. It is estimated that bleach consumption in foul air scrubbers will be 555,000 gallons. This is approximately 230-percent more chemical than historically used for odor control purposes. G:bq.U�a�d AgmW hGOh VOOI& ', Ag .Pryv1aW}....pn"MC Bleach usage for disinfection and filament control has remained fairly stable over time and will continue to be stable. It is estimated that the District will consume 212,100 gallons of bleach each year for these uses. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Based on purchasing 767,000 gallons of bleach at the anticipated unit cost of$0.525 per gallon, including tax, the contract amount will not exceed $400,000. The current fiscal year budget is not sufficient to support the new contract amount, therefore, Board approval to award a contract is being requested. The new contract will impact the current year budget for a six-week period. The appropriate funds are being requested under next fiscal year budget to cover the new program costs. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Line Item:section 5, Page 12) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS None MAE/EMT/SSB:ct/pjm G:1.41e "nd.'B eA NFepw Nl Boa,e AOene9 PepwISWYJIUIem I]le�Upc l OMTS COMMITTEE Mjq Date Tolt.Brd. 3n101 3ne/Ol AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number _ OWS01-11 12(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Oaten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager of Air Quality and Special Projects SUBJECT: INCREASE IN UNIT COST FOR CAUSTIC SODA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01- 01)for an increase in unit cost from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton effective February 15, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $756,300. (2)Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100764 issued to Great Western International for the Purchase of Caustic Soda (Specification No. 2000/01-01),for an increase in unit cost from $462.00 per ton to $515 per ton effective on April 1, 2001, increasing the total amount not to exceed $850,000, if needed. SUMMARY The District competitively bid the Caustic Soda contract under Specification No. 2000/01-01. Caustic Soda is used to control hydrogen sulfides in the District's foul air scrubbers at both treatment facilities and to control odors in trunk lines. The contract was awarded to Great Western International for a one-year contract from September 1, 2000 through August 30, 2001 for a unit cost of $265.00 per dry ton delivered for an amount not to exceed $470,300. In a letter dated February 5, 2001, GW International requested a price increase for caustic soda due to the energy crisis and the resulting increase in the cost of energy, which has increased the cost of the chemical. In addition caustic is temporarily in short supply. Per the letter from GW International, the unit cost of caustic soda will be increased to $462.00 per ton. Subsequently, a second letter dated February 19, 2001, forecasted another increase to $515 per ton effective April 1, 2001. Like the first increase, the cost of energy and supply/demand of the market is the cause for the requested price increases. The District budgeted to consume approximately 1,775 tons of caustic this year. Due to the increase in odor complaints, staff increased the use of caustic in order to control odors from the treatment plants. This increase in caustic use resulted in the projection of an additional 200 tons of chemicals to be consumed over the contract period for a 10 percent increase in use. The total updated caustic consumption is estimated at 1,975 dry tons. t To evaluate the requested unit price increases, staff reviewed the contract with the present chemical supplier, surveyed other large agencies also bidding on the chemical _ at this time, contacted the other major suppliers of the chemical, reviewed industry chemical cost forecasts, and interviewed the District supplier to understand the reason for the requested unit price increases. The chemical supplier's contract allows pass through of abnormal costs. The data received indicates that the chemical bids are rising sharply and are over $400/ton; another chemical supplier told staff they could not match the proposed unit price increases and that electricity costs have risen substantially; driving up the cost of product; the industry forecasts reviewed by staff note price increases will occur and will be substantially increased depending on the cost of electricity; and staff met with our caustic chemical supplier to verify that electricity supply and demand issues merit the requested Increases. District staff and the purchasing manager recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 for an increase in the unit cost of caustic soda from $265.00 per ton to $462.00 per ton that will increase the cost from $470,300 to $756,300. Authorize the General Manager to approve Change Order No. 2 to increase the unit price of caustic soda from $462.00 per ton delivered to a not to exceed $515.00 per ton delivered increasing the contract cost to $850,000 subject to staff review of and acceptance the forecasted price increases. Staff has included a 5% contingency into the $850,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The existing contract amount for caustic soda is $470,300. Based on the revised chemical consumption and Change Order Nos. 1 and 2, the contract amount could increase by $379,700 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 5, Page 12) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Approve General Manager's recommendation for Change Order No. 1 and proceed with competitive bidding process to secure a new contract. Initial contacts with other major suppliers have resulted in similar pricing requested by GW International with minimal assurance of 100 percent allocation. V d CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS 1. February 5, 2001 Letter from GW International 2. February 19, 2001 Letter from GW International MAE/EMT:bac/pjm G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reportst2001 Board Agenda Reponsk0301\Item 12(f).dop aw r February 5, 2001 Marc Dubois Orange County Sanitation Fullerton, CA Dear Marc, Thank you for the time to discuss the caustic soda. I have provided you with extensive information regarding the chlor-alkali market. Because of the extremely dramatic increases and the situation centinuing to tighten, we have had to make a very difficult decision. Beginning February 191h,your new price for caustic soda, 50%, regular grade, will be $407 per dry ton plus freight of$22.00 per ton totaling$429.00 per ton delivered. We cannot afford to be a profitable, respectable business and loose thousands of dollars on every truck of caustic soda shipped. I hope that you will work with us until there is some relief in the market. GW International believes that there is a way to offer some protection. Our plan is to implement formula pricing that is adjusted quarterly. In other words, GWI and Orange County Sanitation. will enter into an agreement that is based upon a fixed gross profit margin for GWI and the"base"will be generated from the publication, "The Harriman North American Outlook'. The"The Harriman North American Outlook"price will be that given for the west coast. At that time the current price(with a I Sday notice)will be adjusted up or down, dollar for dollar, based on market announcements. I will be following up with you in a few days after you have had time to review my proposal. We should set a time to go over this together, whenever it is convenient for you. Please call meat(949) 933-0715)if you should have any questions. Sin Marcia Gomg Account Manager C01p01ple Re2Cqu0Pers 808 SW'S:A Ave'Le Ponlac0.OR 97205 USA lei:1.8W.S17-1a Ha:(5MR=I1 r92 w gry mm Feb-22-DI 00:14ao From-OCSO PURCHASING T149650728 T-035 P.O1/01 Fi26 d f February 19, 2001 Marc Dubois Orange County Sanitation Fountain Valley, CA Dear Marc, Thank you for the time to discuss the emetic soda. I have provided you with cdenaive information regarding the cNor-alkali market. Because of the extremely dramatic increases and the situation continuing to tighten,we have had to make a very difficult decision. Beginning February 191'.your new price far caustic soda,50%,regular grade,will be $407 per dry ton plus freight of$22.00 per ton totaling$429 00 per ton delivered. There has been another increase in the market of$50.00 per dry ton which will be passed on to as April 1,2001. We can offer you firm pricing for 2001 at$479.00 per dry ton, delivered. We cannot afford to be a profitable,respectable business and loose thousands of dollars me every truck of caustic soda shipped. I hope that you will work with us until there is some reliefin the market. OW International believes that there is a way to offer some protection Our plan is to implement formula pricing that is adjusted quarterly. In other words, OWI and Orange County Sanitation. will enter into an agreement that is based upon a fisud gross profit margin for OWI and the"base"will be generated from the publication, 'The Harriman North American Outlook". The"The Harriman North American Outlook"price will be that given for the west coast. At that time the current price(with a 15day notice)wiU be adjusted up or down, dollar for dollar,based an market announcements. I will be following up with you in a few days alter you have had time to review my . propo3dL We should set a time to so over this together, whenever it is convenieut for you. Please call me at(949) 933-0715 if you should have any questions. Siacar � hsarnaaC'� �Z� CGI%Rle NeedryeNrs 00BMjftA rue PorOarQee OP-p6116P W.1-SM-547.160a 1&C(5 =1,o62 MWY.PCE114mJ0111 I0/T0 30Vd W3HD 531tl15 NL71tS3M E90LOZEPTL Z1,!9T T00Z/6t/Z0 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting DOW To ad.of on. W/01 maro1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number gMTS01-14 12(0) Orange County Sanitation District _. FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env. Director of Technical Services Originator: Tom B. Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: Amend Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-07, Establishing Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 00-22, incorporating amendments to the indemnification language. SUMMARY Background: The Irvine Company/Irvine Community Development Company (Irvine Company) intends to construct proposed developments that will generate dry weather urban runoff from the watersheds of Los Trancos and Muddy Canyon located near the Pacific Coast Highway. As a requirement from the California Coastal Commission, the Irvine Company was directed to manage their dry weather urban runoff generated from their proposed developments. In cooperation with the Irvine Company, the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) has agreed to undertake the responsibility for the construction, operation, and maintenance of all facilities required for the collection and discharge of dry weather urban runoff from the Irvine Company's proposed developments, through IRWD's sewer facilities to the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) sewer system. The District has agreed to collect, treat, and dispose of the dry weather urban runoff generated from the Irvine Company's proposed developments pending the finalization of an agreement between IRWD and the District. The District has been working closely with IRWD and the Irvine Company to finalize an agreement between IRWD and the District since the Board adopted the District's Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy (policy), Resolution No. OCSD 00-22, on September 27, 2000. This agreement sets terms and conditions for the collection, treatment, and disposal of dry weather urban runoff from the Irvine Company's proposed developments. The District has met with the parties several times and has finalized and sent the agreement to IRWD on February 26, 2001 for signature. All responsible parties have signed the agreement. Issues: There is an inconsistency of the indemnification language in the agreement and in the policy. Initially, the District formulated the indemnification language in the draft agreement to be consistent with the policy, which states that dischargers are required to Page 1 indemnify and hold the District harmless from all liability associated with the dry weather urban runoff activities. The parties argued that the indemnification language in the draft T agreement and in the policy is unfair because it obligates IRWD to indemnify the District from all liabilities including the District's active negligence or intentional wrongful acts associated with the dry weather urban runoff activities. For example, if District staff negligently or intentionally shuts off the diversion system without due cause, in which case this action may lead to damage, then IRWD will not indemnify the District. Based on IRWD's rational argument, the General Counsel recommended that District staff revise the indemnification language in the draft agreement to recognize the District's responsibility for negligence and intentional wrongful acts, except in the case where the District is negligent or commits intentional wrongful acts to render an emergency service at the dry weather urban runoff diversion system facilities. The parties agreed to the revisions. It became apparent during the development of the agreement that the use of the indemnification language in the policy is not practical to implement for real-world application and needed revisions. For example, potential dischargers with an evident need to discharge dry weather urban runoff to the District's sewer system for treatment will be discouraged to enter into an agreement with the District that indemnifies the District from all liabilities. This situation creates much risk for the discharger. To resolve the inconsistency of indemnification language in the agreement and in the policy, and have it apply equally to all parties to all of the District's agreements, District staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 01-07. A copy of the District's proposed Resolution is attached with the highlighted changes in Section A— 10. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not applicable ALTERNATIVES A no-action alternative will discourage potential dischargers to enter into an agreement with the District. As a result, this situation will prevent the use of our service and the Page 2 intended purpose of our policy, which is to address a public health or an environmental problem associated with dry weather urban runoff discharge. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Resolution No. OCSD 01-07 G1wp.d1elagendMBoard Agenda Repode12001 Board Agenda Reporlc10301\Item 12(g).doo Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00- ESTABLISHING DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF POLICY, AND REPEAL RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-22 WHEREAS, certain types of dry weather urban runoff create public health and/or environmental problems which are infeasible to economically or practically control; WHEREAS, THE Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has available limited system capacity in its collection, treatment and disposal facilities which may allow the District to accept certain dry weather urban runoff discharges without adversely affecting the District's primary function of collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer discharges; WHEREAS, District is willing to accept into its sewerage system aggregate dry weather urban runoff flow discharges not exceeding 10 million gallons per day ("mgd"); WHEREAS, District does not have system capacity available to allow wet weather discharges to the District's facilities; WHEREAS, District has developed a Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy to address certain environmental concerns associated with dry weather runoff; WHEREAS, over the next three (3) years District intends to evaluate (1) sources of dry weather urban runoff; (2) the quality and quantity of dry weather urban runoff discharges to the sewerage system; and (3) District's costs associated with such discharges. The District anticipates that this policy may be revised as a result of such evaluation; WHEREAS, District may accept dry weather urban runoff, provided that the discharge occurs in full and complete compliance with the terms of this Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, including any subsequent amendments thereto; WHEREAS, District intends to initially waive fees and charges associated with authorized discharges of dry weather urban runoff to the sewerage system, where such runoff originates within the District's service area, until such time as (1) the total volume of all dry weather urban runoff discharges to the sewerage system exceeds four (4) mgd calculated on a monthly average or(2) the District otherwise modifies its dry weather urban runoff policy to require dischargers to pay for permit fees, sewer use charges, capital facilities charges, operations and maintenance costs and/or any other fees or charges which the District determines to impose on such discharges; WHEREAS, for purposes of this policy, 'Wet weather"shall mean any period during which measurable rainfall occurs in any portion of the District's service area and shall include the period following the cessation of rainfall until the District determines that the wet weather event is no longer impacting the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, for the purposes of this policy, "dry weather" shall mean any period which does not fall within the definitions of"wet weather." NO THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the following Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy is established as District Policy: POLICY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF INTO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWERAGE SYSTEM No person or entity shall discharge urban runoff, directly or indirectly, to the District's sewerage system during wet weather. The District may accept urban runoff into the sewerage system during dry weather conditions ("dry weather urban runofr') provided that the discharger meets the following requirements: A. Requirements for Obtaining Permission to Discharge 1. The dry weather urban runoff diversion to the sewerage system shall address a public health or environmental problem associated with the runoff discharge that cannot be otherwise economically or practically controlled. 2. A dry weather urban runoff diversion structure shall be designed and installed and other necessary provisions shall be implemented to exclude storm and other runoff from entry into District's sewerage system during wet weather. The diversion structure shall be equipped with a lockable shut-off device, satisfactory to the District, and to which the District shall be provided access at all times; 3. Prior to commencement of discharge of the dry weather urban runoff to the sewerage system, in accordance with the policies and procedures set by the District, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a Wastewater Discharge Permit ("permit")from the District. The District may require that the permit applicant enter into an agreement setting forth the terms under which the dry weather discharge is authorized in addition to or in lieu of issuance of the permit; 4. The permit applicant shall consider and evaluate the feasibility of other disposal alternatives (i.e., discharge into storm drains, reuse and reclamation of the runoff, etc.) for the discharge of the dry weather urban runoff. The permit applicant shall submit to the District a report, satisfactory to the District, evaluating each disposal alternative, and demonstrating why each alternative is not economically or practically feasible to dispose of the proposed dry weather urban runoff in lieu of sewer discharge; 5. The permit applicant's proposed diversion system shall prevent debris and any other pollutants of concern from entering the District's sewerage system. The permit applicant shall submit design drawings and an operations and maintenance plan for the proposed dry weather diversion structure which shall be sufficient to establish that all District requirements will be met to prevent pass through of and/or interference with the District's sewerage facilities. The diversion system shall be capable of measuring and recording on a daily basis the flow discharged to the sewerage system; 6. The permit applicant shall submit best management practices and pollution prevention strategies designed to minimize or eliminate dry weather urban runoff. More stringent practices and strategies may be required depending on the nature of the anticipated discharge; 7. The permit applicant shall submit to the District a proposed method of guarantee the existence of an enforceable mechanism to ensure that the District receives payment for all monies due pursuant to this policy, and any amendments thereto, for as long as the discharge occurs. No permit application shall be complete without such an enforceable mechanism, satisfactory to the District in its sole discretion. This mechanism shall be designed to limit any administrative burden on the District; 6. The General Manager, or his designee, may impose additional requirements as may be appropriate to reduce the burden on the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; 9. Collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer discharges remain the District's primary functions. No additional dry weather urban runoff permits shall be issued if the General Manager, or his designee, determines that such issuance may, alone or in conjunction with other permits, adversely affect the District's primary functions; and 10. The permit applicant shall indemnify and hold the District harmless from all liability associated with the dry weather urban runoff to which the permit and/or agreement apply except for District's active negligence or intentional wrongful acts or omissions but including any negligence which is alleged to have occurred with respect to any District action to render emergency assistance at the diversion system facilities in the event of an operational malfunction or other Problem at such facilities. The terms of the indemnification shall be in a forth satisfactory to District's General Counsel; B. Requirements After Granting Permission to Discharge 1. The quality and quantity of the discharge shall meet the conditions, provisions or limitations contained in the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance No. OCSD-01)'; 2. The permittee shall conduct self-monitoring for the pollutants of concern as directed by the District to ensure compliance with the terms, conditions and limits set forth in the permit/agreement and the District's Ordinances. Unless otherwise directed, the permittee shall conduct self-monitoring of the discharge on a quarterly basis. The results of all self-monitoring shall be submitted to the District, upon request, but in no event later than forty- five (45) days following the completion of sample analysis. The permittee shall monitor the flow and submit reports documenting the quality and quantity of the flow discharged as directed by the District; 3. In the event that the quality or quantity of the dry weather urban runoff discharge to the sewerage system does not meet the conditions, provisions, or limitations set forth in the discharge permittagreement or Ordinance No. OCSD-01, the permittee shall take immediate action to correct the problem(s) to ensure that full compliance is met. The District may take enforcement action for any violation of the terms of the permittagreement and/or the District's Ordinances, including termination of the discharge, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. OCSD-01; 4. Dischargers located within the District's service area shall not initially be required to pay any fees and charges associated with the authorized discharge of dry weather urban runoff to the District's sewerage system. Dischargers located outside the District's service area who the District authorizes to discharge dry weather urban runoff, directly or indirectly, to the District's sewerage system shall initially pay District operations and maintenance costs of$321.00 per million gallons discharged. Once the total volume of all dry weather urban runoff discharges to the District's 'Any reference in this policy to any District Ordinance, policy or permit shall include any subsequent amendments, modifications, revisions or successors to such ordinance, policy or permit. sewerage system exceeds (4) million mgd, all dischargers, including those for whom authorization to discharge has previously been granted, shall pay District operations and maintenance costs, initially at the rate of $321.00 per million gallons discharged. The District reserves the right to impose other fees and charges, including but not limited to permit fees, sewer use charges, capital facilities charges and modified operations and maintenance charges on all urban runoff discharges in accordance with any future amendment of this policy, and pursuant to any other current or future District Ordinances or policies. Failure to pay fees in a timely manner shall be cause for termination of the permit/agreement and the discharge. All dischargers shall, at all times, be subject to noncompliance sampling fees set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-01; 5. The permittee shall provide District's employees with access to the diversion location and all areas from which and through runoff originates and/or flows, during all reasonable hours, which shall include any time when a discharge to the sewerage system may be occurring, for purposes of inspection, monitoring, and verifying compliance with the permit/agreement and/or the District's Ordinances; 6. The permittee shall have complete responsibility for the construction, operation and maintenance of the diversion facility or any other associated facilities and for ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of the discharge permit/agreement and the District's Ordinances; 7. No later than the commencement of any measurable rainfall, each discharger of urban runoff shall shut off the flow of urban runoff(and accompanying storm water) to the District's sewerage system. The discharge shall not resume until the discharger has obtained District approval for the resumption of the discharge. Such approval shall not be deemed effective until the discharger provides written confirmation to the District of approval, which confirmation shall include the first and last name of the District employee providing such approval and the time at which such approval was issued; 8. If the District determines that the dry weather runoff, alone or in conjunction with other discharges, is adversely affecting or threatening to adversely affect the District's collection, treatment and/or disposal facilities, the District shall so notify the permittee who shall immediately cease all such discharge to the sewerage system. The District may, in its sole discretion, allow the continued discharge provided that the permittee installs, operates and maintains additional facilities as the Districts determines are appropriate to ensure that the dry weather runoff does not, alone or in conjunction with other discharges, adversely affect or threaten to adversely affect the District's collection treatment and/or disposal facilities; 9. Under no circumstances shall District authorization to discharge dry weather urban runoff to the District's sewerage system be deemed to provide a vested right for such discharge; and 10. Except as expressly authorized by this policy or a District Ordinance, no urban runoff shall be discharged directly or indirectly into the District's facilities. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 28, 2001. Chair ATTEST! Board Secretary G]wp.dtaus13s50\8oard Agenda Reporrsl8oard-032801-Urban Runoff-Aft 01.doc DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, March 1, 2001, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design,and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 1,2001, at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Guy Carroao John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Alice Jempsa Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Tod Ridgeway Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Andrei loan, Project Manager William Cassidy, Project Manager Directors Absent: Pam Koester, Project Manager Beth Krom Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Mark Esquer,O&M Engineering Manager Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Dawes Mary Lee (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 1 i PDC Committee Minutes , Page 2 March 1, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 1,2001 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson introduced and welcomed Director Alice Jempsa, Los Alamitos, and the newest member of the PDC Committee. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that at the Steering Committee it was decided that the committee meetings for July and August would be changed. There will be no committee meetings in July; instead, the committees will meet in August. The August PDC Committee meeting will be held on August 2. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported that staff will be presenting an update on the ocean outfall metering structure project that was stopped for redesign. Staff will be negotiating with the contractor on the change order, and it will be presented to the committee in April. The overhead costs to suspend the work are estimated at$10,000. There is a task in the scope of work for the design of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation with Brown and Caldwell that provides for miscellaneous unidentified engineering work in the amount of $200,000. The Director of Engineering provides written approval for this work. Mr. Ludwin explained the expenditures to dale as well as proposed expenditures. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from January 18 through February 14,2001. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 March 1, 2001 (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that two addenda were issued in the last month. (12) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Andrei loan, Project Manager, provided an update on the project. The plans and specs are 90% complete and under review. Flows from Prado Dam during the recent rains were up to 5.000 cfs. Another survey will be done on the existing line to see 'rf there are any changes. The right-of-way agreements with the railroad have been approved by their engineering department. Lisa Lawson reported on the February 21 project information meeting with Yorba Linda residents. Of the 30 residents who attended the meeting, 11 were owners of property who would be granting easements through their property. The majority was concerned about the location of the line. Individual letters were sent to those in attendance in response to questions raised at the meeting. A mini-workshop Will be held on the project and as well as the proposed changes from the original concept at the April PDC Committee meeting. Blake Anderson reported that progress is being made in getting federal, state and local funding for the project. The County PFRD has indicated that it may be willing to fund 50% of the estimated cost not to exceed the cost of Alternate A. (13) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS)STATUS REPORT Tom Dawes updated the Directors on the status of the project. There was a Joint Coordinating Committee(JCC)meeting today to discuss the results of the financial study. The JCC will be recommending that the day-to-day management of the project be done by the JCC with delegation of powers to the Orange County Water District's (OCWD)Board. A full board of directors is required for approvals and the JCC will be recommending that this authority be delegated to OCW D as they meet twice a month. Two of the three directors from each agency would have to agree and the money for the Item would have to be In the budget before it could be submitted to the OCWD's Board. Advance notification would be provided to the Sanitation District. Additional recommendations will be presented to the JCC and the Boards on how change orders would be handled before finalizing the final rules. Should the Boards decide to approve the project on March 28,there will be several contracts that will be required to complete design and they will be acted on at that meeting. A separate third-party contract will be required for construction management,which is anticipated to be awarded in September. The consulting contract with CDM will be continued for final design. At the March 28 meeting, If the project is approved, another action will be to award a contract for a 2,200-foot section of pipe and site improvements near the Theo Lacy Jail. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 March 1, 2001 The financial study,which will be discussed at this Saturdays workshop,was prepared to evaluate the impact on rates of both the Orange County Water District and the Sanitation District. The Groundwater Producers have expressed concern about the impact on the replenishment assessment (cost of water). Mr. Anderson reported that the FAHR Committee will be considering the impacts on the District's capital projects, user fees and reserves for the three altematives. (14) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-h) a. PDC01-12 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1,with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$6,134 and a time extension of 59 calendar days,increasing the total contract amount to$1,309,535; and (2)Accept Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1,with Southern Contracting Company as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. PDC01-13 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1,with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$114,973.75 and a time extension of 18 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,786,334.56 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. PDC01-14 Recommend to the Board of Directors to establish a budget for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No.7-7-2, in the amount of$445,000,to be reimbursed by the Design Consultant. Staff was directed to provide a history of the construction change orders at the next PDC Committee meeting. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. PDCOI-15 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with Carollo Engineers for the design of the Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-66, subject to approval by the Board of Directors at the May 23,2001 meeting. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 March 1, 2001 Pam Koester, Project Manager, provided an update on the results of the headworks evaluation and the reasons for staffs recommendation to move forward with replacement of the headworks. e. PDC01-16 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5,for$147,830; and (2)Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report,Job No.J40-5, for a total amount not to exceed$77,830. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. f. PDC01-17 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Authorize transfer of all funds from the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project,Job No. SP-04, to Job No.J-71-7; (2)Approve a budget amendment of $1,586,000 for the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project,Job No. J-71-7,for a total project budget of$2,382,000; and (3) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc., to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71- 7, for an amount not to exceed $359,951. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duty cared to recommend approval to the Boar of Directors. g. PDC01-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to establish a budget of $90,000 for Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station, Contract No.7-144. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. h. PDC01-19 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech ASL Consulting Engineers for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, providing for a change in the name of the Consultant to Tetra Tech ASL, and providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$57,679,for a total amount not to exceed$282,479. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly cared to recommend approval to the Boar of Directors. Director Steve Anderson abstained. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 March 1, 2001 (15) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 7:37 p.m., pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54956.8. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Planning. Design and Construction Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the actions taken will be publicly reported at the Ume the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 15(A). The Committee reconvened in regular session at 7:50 p.m. (16) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY The May 3, 2001 PDC Committee meeting will be changed to May 10 because of a conflict with the CASA conference. The location for the May 10 meeting will be at a location to be determined in Tustin to allow the committee members to attend the OC Division League of Cities meeting following the PDC Committee meeting. Director Tod Ridgeway had requested consideration of delaying the start of the committee meetings to 5:30. After discussion, it was decided to leave the start time at 5 p.m. and delay discussions on action items to later in the meeting if necessary. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 5, 2001 at 5 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. G PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 March 1, 2001 Submitted by: / Tappan D Committee Secretary 6Mp.dLMppndtlP0L4' lftnWee 30101 Drew PDCMlnmu.dcc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date Toad.ordr. 03/01/01 03/2a/O1 AGENDA REPORT Item NurnWr Item Number _ P13031-12 13(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2.47-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$6,134 and a time extension of 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,309,535; and (2)Accept Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, with Southern Contracting Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Change Order No. 2 includes eight items of added work to Job No. P247-1. There are two omission items associated with this change order. There is a 59 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date January 7, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date May 6, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date May 16, 2000 Revised Contract Completion Date July 14, 2000 Actual Completion Date July 14, 2000 Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $1,271,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 32,401.00 This Change (Add) $ 6,134.00 Change Orders to Date $ 38,535.00 Percentage Increase to Date 3.03 % Final Contract Price $1,309,535.00 n1w dl.lymdeleoaldnWdeR,.ftQoo,9 ,a a,ndeaeoddzwamm—u¢iancm, eno11 Page 1 w BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000-01 Budget, section e, Page 104) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P2-47-1, Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, replaces and upgrades electrical and control equipment to the Plant Water Pump Station, the Foster Booster Pump Station, and the Ocean Outfall Station. This project also adds ventilation and air conditioning to the electrical distribution centers throughout Plant No. 2. Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers prepared plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Southern Contracting Company on October 28, 1998. The contract is 100 percent complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 2: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Additional HVAC Circuits $ 1,646 Omission 2 Conduit Coating in Wet Locations $ 8,648 Design Change 3 Control System Modifications $ 2,333 59 Design Change 4 HVAC Drain Modifications $ 3,150 Design Change 5 Concrete Repairs $ 1,448 Omission 6 Transformer Pad Modifications $ 2,962 Design Change 7 Witness Test Reimbursement $ 1,829 Other 8 Cable Bus Substitution $0 Desi n Change Total — Change Order No. 2 $ 6 134 59 ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District Guidelines, Section 15301(B). The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on December 15, 1993. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order DF:dm:ba G%Wdla�gVM � Agen6 Re SVO01B dAgWda ReW 3 W$%It nt]Idaae,W Y M Paget BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANT 2 JOB NO. P2-47-1 '.fit P w 9+ e rt fly m ^ 1 2' I - 4a N rk�v� rl I ^� r tl „„44 {{E�LF 2f "`r 91 rt a y h 1a1 �t Fa 5 Fy'l�� 'j,�R��1ii�! x �t t7� 0 1 �� .pi� +. � +PR�Pb�E�'tl iEJI PROJECTlITIC X.UTHO Fl �"Rpvi' 1 ET• r Ii E Oytl AUTIYO TON TOTAL d 6UdOE { I BU�'• ,k i>I 'C vow y} w ` �Sti t ITE r +�, r t �.t' ` TATI� ° YB '10'$� Project Development' $ 3.000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3.270 109% Studies/Permitting 1 $ 56.000 1 $ 56.000 1 $ 56,000 $ 56.000 1$ 54,565 97% Consultant PSA $ 446,000 $ 446.000 _ $ 446,000 $ 446,000 $ 405,128 91% Design Staff $ 158,000 $ 168,000 $ 158,000 $ 158,000 $ 137,149 87% Construction Contract $ 1,303,401 $ 6.134 $ 1,309.535 $ 1,303,401 $ 6.134 $ 1,309.535 $ 1.278,108 98% Construction Administration $ 281,000 $ 281,000 $ 281,000 $ 281,000 $ 234,262 83% Constmction Inspection $ 255.000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 185,390 73% Contingency $ 112,599 $ (6,134) $ 106,465 $ 112,599 $ (6,134) $ 106,465 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 4,050,000 $ 2.615,000 $ - $ 2,615,000 $ 2,616,000 $ - $ 2,615,000 $ 2,297,872 88% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4,050,000 1 $ 2,615,000 1 $ - $ 2,615,000 $ 2,615,000 1 $ - $ 2,615,000 $ 2,297,872 1 88% g\wPdlekngyoW,..W247.1k st.,k npe orders=2 TABLES Sheet: BIT CO2 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-47-1 AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE TIME TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 10/28/98 $ 1,271,000.00 $ 1,271,000.00 0.00 485 485 CO NO. 1' 716100 $ 32,401.00 $ 1,303,401.00 2.55 10 495 CO NO.2 Pending $ 6,134.00, $ 1,309,536.00 3.03 69 554 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 i g:\wp.dtalsng4obs...%P247-1\Conalru0ion Mgml Fiks\Cbange Ordem=2 TABLES Sheet:CO Stet Rpt. Page 1 of 5 Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2—Job No. P2-47-1 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) $6,134.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work Is hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADDITIONAL HVAC CIRCUITS This item provides labor, equipment and material to increase the size of branch circuits to some of the HVAC units as well as add a branch circuit to a relay panel. The contractor was directed to add one circuit to power the relay panel in the Plant Water Pump Station and increase the size of one circuit to feed HPAA and HP-4B in the Main 12KV Service Center. During shop drawing review it was determined that the wiring provided in the contract drawings was insufficient for the new heat pumps. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-P2471-001). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,646.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—CONDUIT COATING IN WET LOCATIONS This change order item provides labor and materials to increase the amount of PVC Coated conduit to be installed on the project. This item expands the specified areas for"wet and corrosive" locations to include the Plant Water Pump Station basement and the Foster Pump Station. In these areas, conduit raceway was changed from bare galvanized rigid steel (GRS) and aluminum conduit to PVC-coated GRS and aluminum conduit to improve corrosion resistance. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-P2471-002). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,648.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2—Job No. P247-1 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. ITEM 3—CONTROL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS This item includes hardware, software, wiring and documentation changes to the control system at the Foster Pump Station and HVAC monitoring at Distribution Center"A" and "B" in order to match the existing equipment and meet the needs of the facility. At the Foster Pump Station the contractor was directed to change the PLC hardware configuration; increase the size of the control panel; modify the wiring to match the existing panels and pump controls; change the programming to match the existing pump controls and OCSD control standards; modify the mounting of the field instruments for easier maintenance access; and update the contractor-supplied drawings for those changes. At Distribution Center"A" and "B"the contractor was directed to add documentation for the HVAC monitoring system for easier maintenance troubleshooting. Additional contract time was required in order to implement the changes. In addition, there was limited staff time for software testing and this accounted for a short delay in the contractors work. The costs associated with this Change Order Rem were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-P2471-004, PCH-P2471-005, PCH-P2471-008/FCO-P2471-011, FCO-P2471-014, FCO-P247- 015). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,333.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 59 Calendar Days ITEM 4— HVAC DRAIN MODIFICATIONS This item directs the contractor to route the HVAC-unit condensate drain piping to the existing roof drains rather than as shown on the contract drawings. This included substituting approximately 200- feet of 2-inch pipe for 1-inch pipe and deleting 60-feet of 4-inch steel pipe. The credit associated with this Change Order Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-P2471-007). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(3,150,00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—CONCRETE REPAIRS This change order item provides labor, equipment and material to repair the existing concrete in several locations resulting from existing equipment that was removed from service. Once existing switchgear, motor-control centers, and transformers were removed, much of the existing concrete in these areas required refinishing that was not included as part of the contract. For safety reasons, the contractor was directed to complete this work. The work was accomplished on contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference FCO-P2471.010). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,448.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 d ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2—Job No. P2-47-1 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. ITEM 6—TRANSFORMER PAD MODIFICATIONS This item changes the size of the concrete equipment pad beneath the transformers outside the 12 kV Distribution Center"A". The pad size was decreased based on information from the shop drawing that indicated actual equipment clearances, weight and oil storage requirements to provide a more cost- effective installation. This item also includes a credit for roof drains that did not require relocation, as there was no longer interference from the equipment pad. The credit associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a)of the General Provisions (Reference FCO-P2471-013). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(2,962.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—WITNESS TESTING REIMBURSEMENT This item reimburses the District for travel costs for staff to witness the factory testing of the project electrical equipment. Specification 67-1001 includes a provision for the contractor to reimburse the District for travel expenses for one District employee to witness the factory test. The costs associated with this change order item are direct costs associated with the travel arrangements pursuant to Section 67-1001 of the Detailed Specifications (Reference FCO-P2471-012). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(1,829.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—CABLE BUS SUBSTITUTION This change order item substitutes low-voltage bus duct for cable bus on the secondary side of Transformers PWA and PWB. The District maintenance staff requested an alternative to the bus duct for this application. The engineering staff chose cable bus as a better alternative for this environment. This Change Order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-P2471-003). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $6.134.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 59 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2—Job No. P2-47-1 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that there is a 59 calendar day time extension required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 7, 1999 Original Contract Time: 485 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 6, 2000 Contract Time Extension this C.O.: 59 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 69 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 554 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 14, 2000 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: July 14, 2000 Original Contract Price $ 1,271,000.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 32,401.00 This Change (Add) $ 6,134.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,309,535.00 Page 5 of 5 Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2—Job No. P2-47-1 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. Board Authorization Date: March 28,2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Southern Contracting Company Contractor Date HMP.DTA\ENGVOBS&CONTRACTS\P2474 CONSTRUCTION MGMT FILES\CHANGE ORDERS\CO2.DOC PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Dae Toed.of Dlr. 3III I 3/2a/Ol AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDO01-13 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of $114,973.75 and a time extension of 18 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,786.334.56. SUMMARY Change Order No. 7 includes 6 items of added work to Contract No. 3-38-1. There is an 18 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date May 18, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date November 27, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 7 Current Contract Completion Date January 18, 2001 Projected Completion Date February 5, 2001 Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 307,564.81 This Change (Add) (Pedest) $ 114,973.75 Change Orders to Date $ 422,538.56 Percentage Increase to Date 5.05% Amended Contract Price $ 8,786,334.56 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (section 8, Page 27) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) R..W0 OMMe Page 1 The contingency fund of the project budget will provide for the increased construction contract costs. Refer to the budget information table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 3-38-1, Improvements to Miller-Holder trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, includes the installation of 15,933 feet of sewer pipe, manholes, and appurtenant facilities in the City of Buena Park, and along the CALTRANS right-of-way in Beach Boulevard. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded on April 28, 1999 to Fleming Engineering, Inc. The contract is now 99% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 7: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Extra work associated with undisclosed $ 32,000.00 3 Changed utilities. Condition 2 Additional excavation and shoring for 1 Changed bore pit. $ 2,181.00 Condition 3 New 8-inch service connection. $ 4,500.00 0 Changed Condition 4 Alternate traffic control at Hillsborough $ 11,243.00 1 Other Drive bore operation. 5 Replacement of undisclosed loop $ 7,549.75 0 Changed detectors. Condition 6 Traffic control plan modifications at $ 57,500.00 5 Other Hillsborough Drive. 7 Time extension for inclement weather $ 0.00 8 Other Total Change Order No. 7 $114 973.75 18 Item No. 1 includes 9 sub-items of added work associated with undisclosed utilities. Please refer to the change order for detailed information. Item Nos. 4 and 6 were required to comply with the direction of the City of La Mirada to maintain access to Hillsborough Drive throughout construction. ALTERNATIVES None a vtsed MOBS Page 2 e CECIA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIA was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order BP:Ic RmeeE: aaa� Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $20000.00 $8000.00 $6000.00 $6000.00 $6000.00 $5934.00 99% Studies/Permitting $10000.00 $24000.00 $24000.00 $24000.00 $24000.00 $23973.00 100% ' Consultant PSA $300000.00 $185000.00 $18500000 S185000.00 $185000.00 1 $181938.00 98% Design Staff $153000.00 $276000.00 $276,000.00 $276000.00 $278000,00 $260491.00 94% Construction Contract $4308000.00 $8671361.00 $114,973.75 $8.786,334.75 $8,671360.81 $114973.75 $8788334.56 $8767010.00 100% Construction Administration $100000.00 $331000.00 $331,000,00 S331000.00 $331000.00 $241304.00 73% Construction Inspection $120000.00 $700000.00 $700000.00 $700000.00 $700000.00 $643976.00 92% Continoency 1 $914,000.001 $495639.00 -$114973.75 $380,665.25 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $5,925,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,689,000.00 $10,193.360,81 $114,973.75 E70,308,334.56 $10,124,828.00 98% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $5,925,000.00 $10.689,000.00 1 $10,689,000.00 1 $10,193,36081 $114,973.75 $10,308,334.58 $10,124,626.00 98% 9%wp.dla�ngVobsondc nlmcW-384 WAgolbbloco7 Form R.v .d On.4,2000 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 05/18/1999 $ 8.363.796.00 $ 8,363,796.00 560 560 CO NO. V 10/20/1999 $ 21,475.00 $ 8,385,271.00 0.26 0 560 CO. NO.2' 12/20/1999 $ 46,685.00 $ 8,431,956.00 0.81 7 567 CO. NO.3' 0112612000 $ 30,830.81 $ 8,462,786.81 1.18 4 571 CO.NO.4 04/26/2000 $ 130,622.00 $ 8,593,408.51 2.75 26 597 CO. NO. 5' 07/07/2000 $ - $ 8,593,408.81 2.75 0 597 CO.NO.6" 09/14/2000 $ 77,952.00 $ 8,671,360.81 3.68 15 612 CO.NO.7 Pending $ 114;973r 6 $ 8,786,334.56 6:073 18` ' 630' 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 "Approved by PDC per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 g/wpdta/eng/jobs and Contracts/3-38-1/costatusreport7 ' Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering. Inc. C.O No. Seven (7) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Amount of this Change Order (Add) $114,973.75 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — EXTRA WORK ASSOCIATED WITH UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES This item is for labor, material, equipment and delay costs associated with the following subterranean facilities: A. Undisclosed 12-inch Steel Conduit—The Contractor spent extra time supporting, shoring and excavating around an existing 12-inch steel conduit at Station No. 83+88. This conduit was not shown on the plans and was not marked in the field. Cost of this is change is $3,292. (Reference FCO No. 27, Impact Notice No. 51). B. Undisclosed Corrugated Metal Pipe-The Contractor spent extra time to support an 18-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) at Station No. 87+03, which was not shown on the plans nor marked in the field. The extra costs are for slowed production to protect this tine in place and adjustments for shoring equipment which caused minor cave ins. Cost for this change is $6,284. (Reference FCO No. 28, Impact Notice No. 52). C. Undisclosed 2-inch Steel Conduit—The Contractor Incurred standby time to identify a 2-inch diameter steel conduit that interfered with the bore pit and manhole excavation at Station No. 116+63. This conduit was not shown on the plans and was not marked in the field. Cost of this change is $2,036. (Reference FCO No. 31, Impact Notice No. 55). D. Undisclosed 3-inch Steel Pipe Crossings—The Contractor spent extra time to support, shore, and tunnel under two existing parallel 3-inch diameter steel pipes crossing the mainline pipe trench at Station No. 104+93. These steel pipes were not shown on the plans nor marked in the field. Cost of this change is $4,914. (Reference FCO No. 30, Impact Notice No. 59). E. Undisclosed Traffic Signal Conduit—The Contractor spent extra time to shore, support, and tunnel under an existing 2-inch steel Caltrans traffic signal conduit at Station No. 112+27. This conduit was not shown on the plans and was not marked in the field. Cost of this change is $4,635. (Reference FCO No. 33, Impact Notice No, 61). F. Undisclosed 6-inch Steel Pipe—The Contractor spent extra time to shore, protect in place, and tunnel under an existing 6-inch steel utility at Station No. 99+60. This steel pipe was not shown on the plans nor marked in the field. Cost of this change is $5,058. (Reference FCO No. 35, Impact Notice No. 56). G. Undisclosed Storm Drain Crossing—The Contractor incurred slowed production to shore, support and tunnel under an existing 184nch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain crossing at Station No. 117+00. This storm drain was not shown on the plans nor marked In the field. Cost of this change is $1,133. (Reference FCO No. 35, Impact Notice No. 62). Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Seven (7) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering H. Undisclosed 12-Inch Utility Line—The Contractor incurred slowed production to shore, support and tunnel under an existing 12-inch oil line at Station No. 117+72. This line was not shown on the plans nor marked in the field. Cost of this change is $1,236. (Reference FCO No. 35, Impact Notice No. 63). I. Undisclosed 12-inch Water Main-The Contractor spent extra time to shore, support and protect in place a newly constructed 12-inch PVC water main that encroached into the trench zone at Station No. 118+95. In addition, the Contractor had to replace a concrete thrust block that terminated at the centerline of the Districts trench. This waterline was not shown on the plans nor marked in the field. Cost of this change is $3,412. (Reference FOO No. 36). This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $32,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION AND SHORING FOR BORE PIT This item is for labor, equipment, and material costs to perform additional excavation to modify the shoring for the bore pit at Station No. 116+63. The profile for the 24-inch jacked steel casing was lowered to provide enough clearance to jack under an existing 21-inch VCP trunk sewer(line E) crossing at Station no. 1+06. This work was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 29, Impact Notice No. 58). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.181.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 3— NEW 8-INCH SERVICE CONNECTION This item is for labor, equipment, and material costs to provide an 8-inch service lateral connection from the District's new manhole at Station No. 119+62 to a point approximately 20-feet west of this manhole. The contract documents did not provide for a service connection to a new development on the northwest comer of Hillsborough Drive and Beach Boulevard. The developers 8-inch sewer line extended to the property line, but he was not authorized to extend this service line into a State Highway (Beach Blvd.) without an approved Encroachment Permit. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 36). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Flemina Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Seven (7) Date: March 28. 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1 Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina ITEM 4—ALTERNATE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT HILLSBOROUGH DRIVE BORE OPERATION This item is for Contractor's labor, material, and equipment necessary to modify the contract traffic control plans for the bore operation at Hillsborough Drive and Beach Boulevard. District Staff implemented this change by way of direction received from Caltrans for public safety reasons. Caltrans stated that the speed limit on a State Highway(Beach Blvd.)was high enough to require that the jacking pit be protected with K-rail and crash cushions. The original contract traffic control plans integrated the mainline pipe installation and the bore operation behind type 3 barricades along the lane lines on Beach Boulevard. This was based on a full street closure of Hillsborough Drive. This was rejected at the time of construction by the City of LaMirada. The work consisted of labor to setup the revised traffic control, the purchase of special traffic control signs, and the rental of crash cushions, and K-rail. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 6). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,243.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 5 - REPLACEMENT OF UNDISCLOSED LOOP DETECTOR This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to replace damaged loop detectors at various locations along Beach Boulevard. The undisclosed loop detectors totaled thirteen, which were not shown on the plans and could not be visually identified under the paving cap. The Subcontractor's (Loop Masters, Inc.)work consisted of cutting the loops out and replacing, rewiring from the loop to the pullbox, locating stubouls, setup temporary traffic control, and splicing to the existing DLC line. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice no. 34). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,549.75 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering. Inc. C.O No Seven (7) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering ITEM 6—TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN MODIFICATIONS AT HILLSBOROUGH DRIVE This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to implement traffic control phases VITA, VIIB, VIIC, VIID, and VIIE, as directed by the City of LaMirada. The City of LaMirada required that the District's Contractor provide ingress and egress into Hillsborough Drive all times during the construction of the main line between Station No. 115+60 to Station No. 119+62, including the bore operation at Station 116+63. The contract plans showed a complete street closure for Hillsborough Drive (Stage VII Detour Map) for the duration of the construction through the intersection of Hillsborough Drive and Beach Boulevard. The District's Design Consultant stated that the City had approved the detour plan prior to bid. During the initial phase of construction at the intersection, the City received mounting pressure from the general public in the area to provide access to Hillsborough Drive. To comply with the access requirements to Hillsborough Drive, the Contractor was directed to construct the mainline pipe out of sequence and in some phases, in a backward direction. This induced production delays. The extra work consisted of setting up five different traffic control phases, including the purchase of special signage, rental of K-rail, and crashes cushions, and their installation and relocation. This change order item added traffic control equipment and special signage that was used on the Beach Boulevard mainline installation which was not included in Item 4. A concrete field closure was installed in the final Stage VIIE scope of work. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 34). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $57,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days ITEM 7—TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER This item is to adjust the time of completion based on 30-days of inclement weather to date. Total inclement weather days to date: 30 Calendar Days Contract inclusive weather days: 12 Calendar Days Contract time extension to date: 10 Calendar Days Contract time extension: 8 Calendar Days This item is in compliance with Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 7 of the Construction Agreement. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Seven (7) Date: March 28, 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering__ General note: All of the above items, which include time extensions, may be adjusted for compensible delay costs in a future Change Order. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHAI4GE ORDER: $114,973.75 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 18 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 18 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 18, 1999 Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 27 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 18 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 70 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 630 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 5, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA Actual Final Completion Date: NIA Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 307,564.81 This Change (Add) (BedueF) $ 114,973.75 Amended Contract Price $ 8,786,334.56 Page 6 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Enaineerina, Inc. C.O No. Seven (7) Dale: March 28. 2001 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No, 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Board Acceptance Date: March 28, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meebm;Date Toad.of Dr. 03/0 l/0 l 03, 101 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO1-14 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator:. William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Establish a budget for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, in the amount of$445,000, to be reimbursed by the Design Consultant. SUMMARY The five 200-horsepower (hp) sewage pumps installed on the station's easterly bay in 1998-99, as part of"Improvements to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1", have failed to perform as required. The pumps cavitate causing rapid wear, and excessive vibration of the pumps, increasing maintenance and reducing the life of the pumps. Cavitation also reduces the pump's capacity and efficiency. Designed for a total capacity of 40.4 million gallons per day (mgd) to handle peak wet weather (storm) flows, the pumps have been restricted to 30.5 mgd to eliminate the cavitation. Cavitation occurs when gas comes out of solution to form tiny vapor bubbles prior to passing through the pump. The bubbles collapse as they pass through the pump causing pits, erosion, vibration, and noise. The vibration is caused by the imbalance and surging from the uneven distribution of the collapsing bubbles. The noise is similar to the sound of pumping sand or gravel. The Design Consultant for Contract No. 7-7-1, and Staff, have investigated the cause, and reviewed numerous remedies to minimize and/or eliminate the cavitation. Remedies reviewed include: • Replace the pump impellers • Increase the water surface level in the wet well • Trim the existing pump impellers • Limit the maximum operating speed of the variable frequency drive (VFD) pumps • Replace the three (3) constant speed drives with VFDs • Increase the future capacity of the westerly bay's pumps to make up for lost capacity in resolving the cavitation of the easterly bay's pumps • Replace the pumps Staff recommends that the pumps be replaced with pumps suited for the full range of operating conditions of the pump station. WMW.%IWq.did�Id Npenae WIft=l B MA,ndeI r,0301M(.m ll(d).d. Page 1 R s The Design Consultant and Staff mutually agree that the Design Consultant made a a design error in the pump specifications. The work to resolve the cavitation problem is the responsibility of the Design Consultant. The Design Consultant has agreed to redesign and construct the new project at no cost to the District and reimburse the District for its costs associated with the redesign and replacement. A Reimbursement Agreement with the Design Consultant for the Orange County Sanitation District (District) to replace the pumps is under development. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract 7-7-2, is $445,000. A Reimbursement Agreement with the Design Consultant is under development. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. The District will award a construction contract and the Design Consultant will reimburse the District for all related redesign and construction costs. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget shall serve as a means to track costs that are to be reimbursed by the Design Consultant. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Proiect Background The Main Street Pump Station was constructed in 1986. It was designed to have an ultimate capacity of 80.8 million gallons per day (mgd), with flow split to two identical wet wells (east and west bays). Each bay would have five (5) non-clog vertical non- clog sewage pumps. The original pump station contract, Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, installed in 1986, one set of five 50-horsepower (hp) pumps on the westerly bay. The pumps are rated for a 25.5-mgd total capacity and discharge through an interim connection to the Sunflower Trunk. Ultimately, the pumps are to be replaced with five 200-hp pumps, with a total capacity of 40.4 mgd, and are to discharge through the westerly Baker force-main to the Baker-Main Trunk. can.eiaaaeaen`eoam neeaea aepon:zoai eoam Aa�aa eepnu,o0onuem,a�eLeo Page 2 Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, installed in 1999, five (four duty/ one standby)200-horsepower(hp) pumps on the easterly bay that discharge to the Baker-Main Trunk through the easterly Baker force-main. Two pumps are powered by variable frequency driven (VFD-variable speed) motors, and three pumps are driven with constant speed motors. The pumps were designed for a total capacity of 40.4 million gallons per day(mgd). However, to eliminate cavitation, the total flow from the pumps is currently restricted to 30.5 mgd by partially closing a downstream discharge valve. Remedy Altematives The Design Consultant for Contract No. 7-7-1, and Staff, investigated each of the following methods or approaches to eliminate the cavitation problem. Replace the pump impellers: The absolute pressure required at the eye of the impeller is characteristic of the impeller, pump and speed (revolutions per minute-rpm) of the pump. It is determined by tests of similar impeller/pump configurations operated at constant speeds. The pump manufacturer investigated the use of other impellers, Including impellers from other pump models. The manufacturer proposed an Impeller from a different model based on a theoretical calculated performance. The custom configuration needed to fix the cavitation in the Installed pumps would theoretically meet the pressure requirements. However, the pump's estimated performance curve barely and questionably encompasses the pump's calculated range of operation. The proposed configuration also has other deficiencies. They include a 3-vane impeller design which has a track record of clogging thus Increased maintenance, an additional restriction entering the pump (creating additional undesired forces on the impeller thus increased maintenance), and the configuration has no track record. Increase the water surface level in the wet well: The operating levels of the wet well could be increased above design levels, thus increasing the available absolute pressure to above the required pressure. The levels required would further back up the flow into the trunk, submerging the trunk at the wetwell. Submergence of the trunk would cause grease build up in the trunk system. Velocities in the trunk approaching the wet well would also be decreased depositing sediment in the trunk. An increase in cleaning and maintenance cost for the trunk system would result. Trim the pump impellers: Reducing the flow from the pump by reducing the diameter of the impeller would reduce the observed cavitation problems. Trimming the impellers would permanently reduce the total capacity of the pump bay from 40.4 mgd to 30.5 mgd. Custom control programming could allow Impeller diameters for a capacity of 31.5 mgd. The trimmed impellers could not be replaced with impellers of the original diameter for future peak wet weather flows without cavitation returning. Limit the maximum operating speed of the variable frequency drive pumps: Reducing the flow from the pump by limiting the pump's speed would reduce the observed cavitation problems. The maximum speed could increase as the number of pumps running increase. The cavitation would be eliminated in the variable frequency drive (VFD) pumps, however the constant speed driven pumps would GWp.NaNPoMa)BmC MMWBFepMs�1�0,BmN Ag..Repw4 WM.19(e)A Page 3 continue to cavitate until the flow equal to four pumps running at full speed is reached. Additionally, several important operational features (e.g., bypass of the VFD) standard to Orange County Sanitation District (District) pump stations would be lost. Replace the three constant speed drives with VFDs: The cavitation within the three constant speed pumps could be eliminated by replacing the drives with VFDs, and limiting the maximum operating speed as stated above. Limiting the maximum speed to less than 100%, and tying the maximum speed to the number of pumps running, is poor design. Also, space within the pump station is prohibitive and features (e.g., bypass of the VFD) standard to the District could not be used. Increase the future capacity of the westerly bay's pumps: The impellers of the easterly bay's pumps would be trimmed to eliminate the cavitation as stated above. The resulting loss in capacity would be added to the current ultimate capacity for the westerly bay, for a total station capacity of 80.8 mgd. However, It is uncertain pumps with capacity of 49.3 to 50.3 million gallons per day(mgd) exists for the operating conditions of the pump station. Additionally, the District would have paid for facilities not received, and incur unwarranted cost in the future. Replace the current pumps: The pumps installed, would be replaced with pumps of the designed capacity. Pumps that meet the design requirements are available. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the pumps be replaced with pumps suited for the full range of operating conditions of the pump station. Staff has met with the Design Consultant to review the alternatives and Staffs recommendation. The Design Consultant agrees with Staff's recommendations. Additionally, the Design Consultant and Staff, mutually agree that the Design Consultant made a design error in the pump specifications. The work to resolve the cavitation problem is the responsibility of the Design Consultant. A Reimbursement Agreement with the Design Consultant for the District to replace the pumps is under development. ALTERNATIVES 1. The District could continue to operate the pumps as currently installed, manually regulating (partially dosing a discharge valve) the maximum capacity of the station to match influent flows. Thus increasing operating and maintenance costs. 2. District could choose another alternate from those reviewed. Each alternate reviewed, other than the one recommended by Staff, fails to meet industry standard guidelines 1 good design practices for pump station design and deliver the station's design capacity. G\wp.ElaVAenCalOa^ ,J PgenLL Ra QWIE ,d I..Repots Mlftm p�e).drc Page 4 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 30, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Figure 1, Location Map WDC:jo:jak G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda ReportsQ001 Board Agenda Reporte\03011Item 13(e).doc GM .=Ngenfta PpenW ReRw QOOn BON AWft ftp WXnnem 13(e) Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 r ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED iPROPOSED FUNDS THIS , .PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK- AUTHORIZED -PROJECT BUDGET 11- REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED - BUDGET' . BUDGET INCREASEk. BUDGET. TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%). Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ Design Staff $ 30.000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0% Construction Contract $ 285,000 $ 285,000 $ - $ Construction Administration $ 28.000 $ 28,000 $ - $ Construction Inspection $ 27.000 $ 27,000 $ - $ Contingency $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ - $ - $ 445,000 $ 445,000 $ - $ 30.000 $ 30,000 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ 445.000 $ 445.000 PROJECT NET $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 30.000 1 $ 30,000 1 $ 0% 0x dmndsvass a mrv .Tsv-+1wms,.eaammwwocm,wn�v+-+a ewv=i r.eu.uiom,dnd 5 TO Mp�N STREEt MOO,',CppVp St Ntp.?Z.2 COWRpC P pGP ON 4 k A� 1 ains wa � J wn o� I �•.� ` AY S \R o f BAk R cc Y 1 R 9 rl y � R YR / dp n ?Y a VINE ., RE 1 G Af RfSFp� �' PDC COMMITTEE Meetmg Date TOW.001r. 3/1/01 3/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-15 13(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 4 with Carollo Engineers for the design of the Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, subject to approval by the Board of Directors at the May 23, 2001 meeting. SUMMARY The Headworks at Plant No. 2 has been expanded or modified by more than 40 different projects over the past 30 plus years. There are a number of Headworks components requiring major rehabilitation, replacement, automation and safety/seismic upgrades. The Orange County Sanitation District (District) awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to Carollo Engineers for preliminary engineering of Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66. Based on District staff input through a series of workshops with Carollo Engineers, the construction cost presented in the Preliminary Engineering Report was estimated to be $123M. The current FY2000-2001 budget is $48M. Carollo Engineers was subsequently awarded Addendum No. 3 to their existing contract to analyze the following four alternatives to the proposed $123M Headworks project (Alternative 1A), to potentially reduce the construction cost: • Alternative 1 B - Designing the structural components of the Headworks for the ultimate flow, 517 million gallons per day (mgd) and the mechanical components for the projected 2020 peak flow (340 mgd) including cost saving measures. • Altemative 2A - Designing the structural and mechanical components of the Headworks for the projected 2020 peak flow. • Alternative 2B - Designing the structural and mechanical components of the Headworks for the projected 2020 peak flow including cost saving measures. UWMSWIM . 6Npmd W AgMde ROgq SMOI a Agenda w ftn wtvwm lxmd= Page 1 • Alternative 3 - Rehabilitating the existing Headworks and constructing new Headworks as needed for the projected 2020 peak flow. A series of three workshops were conducted to evaluate the various alternatives. The workshop participants selected cost savings measures in Alternatives 1 B and 2B that were most appropriate from an Operations and Maintenance standpoint. Although Alternative 2B was determined to have the lowest construction cost (i.e., $102M), it is recommended that Alternative 1 B ($108M) be selected for the following reasons: • Alternative 1 B provides more value in terms of capacity per dollar spent, (i.e., $0.21/gallon, for Alternative 1B vs. $0.30/gallon for Alternative 2b). • Alternative 1 B makes provisions for future flow. Building the structures to handle the projected ultimate flow now would save the Orange County Sanitation District (District) money in the future. Staff recommends that the District proceed with the design of Alternative 1 B, keeping in mind that additional cost saving modifications may be made to the project elements based on a formal Value Engineering Workshop to be conducted early in the design process, and the pilot studies which will be conducted later this year. Lastly, since Carollo Engineers has been intimately involved in the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering Report, and has a thorough understanding of the District's requirements for this project, Staff recommends that Carollo Engineers be considered for the design of the proposed Headworks project. Following fee negotiations, a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for final design would be brought before the Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee and the Board for approval in April 2001. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Headworks analysis was performed by Carollo Engineers under Addendum No. 3 approved by the Board in November 2000, to Carollo Engineers' existing PSA. No additional authorization is being requested at this time. The PSA Table is attached. G:1,dlalg..Bo9,E mane.Rl,.n I Boa.Agenex Rep.:,Dam We 13(f).me Page 2 w BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) No additional budget expenditures are being requested at this time. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A preliminary construction cost of$48M was included in the (Orange County Sanitation District's (District) FY 2000/01 Budget for the new Headworks. As part of the preliminary engineering process, a series of workshops were conducted to present the proposed project elements to the District's Engineering and Operations staff. Based on better project definition and decisions made in the workshops, the estimated construction cost for the new Headworks increased substantially to approximately$123M. In an effort to reduce costs, District staff and Carollo Engineers conducted a one- day Value Engineering workshop to discuss potential cost saving measures for the new Headworks project (Alternative 1A) described in the Preliminary Engineering Report. The results of this workshop provided the basis for approval of an additional engineering study by the Board in November 2000 (i.e., Addendum No. 3 to Carollo Engineers PSA). The following four alternatives were evaluated as part of Addendum No. 3: • Alternative 1 B - Build current new Headworks project for an operational capacity of 340 million gallons per day (mgd)with provisions for an ultimate peak flow capacity of 517 mgd and include cost saving measures. • Alternative 2A- Build new Headworks for an operational capacity of 340 mgd. • Alternative 2B - Build new Headworks for an operational capacity of 340 mgd including cost saving measures. • Alternative 3 - Build new metering and diversion structure, new bar screens, new pumping to replace Headworks B, new partial grit basins, new partial grit handling/loading, new chemical facilities, new electrical building and new yard piping/structure, and rehabilitate Headworks C pumping and grit basins for an operational capacity of 340 mgd. New facilities included cost saving measures where appropriate. Gi"41 wda�AMdaRga1S1' lB Apda Repsk IMl 13n.dw Page 3 Detailed cost information relative to these alternatives is presented in Attachments 3,4, and 5. A summary of costs for each alternative is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1 CONSTRUCTION COST FOR HEADWORKS ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION COST 1A $123.2 M 1B* $108.2 M 2A $116.5 M 2B* $102.0 M 3 $145.7 M *A total of 23 cost saving measures were evaluated for Alternatives 1 B and 2B (Refer to Attachment 4). Alternatives 1A and 2A include the construction of a new headworks with structural capacities of 517 million gallons per day (mgd) and 340 mgd, respectively. Even though Alternative 1A is $7M higher than Alternative 2A, it is a better value relative to the capacity provided (i.e., gain 177 mgd more structural capacity for an additional cost of$7M). The value can be more readily seen if the costs are compared in terms of$/gallon. Based on this approach, Alternative 1A's cost of$0.24/gallon is less than the $0.34/gallon for Alternative 2A. Alternatives 1 B and 2B are the same as Alternatives 1 A and 2A with the inclusion of cost saving measures. Alternative 1 B is about$6M more than Alternative 2B. In terms of$/gallon, however, the cost of Alternative 1 B ($0.21/gallon) is less than the cost of Alternative 2B ($0.30/gallon). Alternative 3 includes the rehabilitation of the existing headworks and construction of a new headworks with a combined structural capacity of 340 mgd. The cost of this alternative is significantly greater than the cost of the other alternatives (i.e., greater by$22.5M to $43.7M). It should be noted that the cost presented in Table 1 is only the initial cost of this alternative. In order to compare alternatives with similar useful lives, additional funds will be needed in the future to either upgrade the existing headworks further or replace it with new facilities. This will only make the cost differential greater. Since the cost of this alternative is significantly greater than the other alternatives, it is not recommended for further consideration. Based on an economic analysis, Alternative 1 B is the preferred alternative. Not only does this alternative have a better value now, but it will also save the District money in future construction costs. Building structures to handle a flow of 517 mgd instead of 340 mgd now and 177 mgd later will require less concrete and associated building materials because of the use of common wall construction. c:w AW"mce�fens Amm Wle Wnamaa Rep WMI%n.n IN0ex Page 4 v Based on a technical analysis, Alternative 1 B Is also preferred because it provides greater flexibility to handle future conditions. In addition, the hydraulic flow splitting would be less complex. The potential major disadvantages of this alternative include: • Building facilities now for flows that may not materialize • Building facilities now that will require retrofitting before they are actually needed because the flows don't materialize as soon as expected (10-20% of the structural components may be affected) Since the cost benefits outweigh the potential disadvantages, Staff recommends that the District proceed with Alternative 1 B. It should be noted that the pilot work scheduled for later in 2001 will also help to better define the process elements of the new Headworks facility. For example, the pilot work may demonstrate that screenings washing is not required which, in turn, would reduce the construction cost. In addition, other cost saving measures may be identified in a more comprehensive Value Engineering workshop to be conducted at the beginning of the Design effort. The construction cost may also be further reduced by as much as$4.OM if the Odor Control Study, currently being performed by Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff, shows that soil filters can be used in lieu of packed tower scrubbers for odor control. ALTERNATIVES The District could consider issuing a Request for Proposal for design services to other prospective firms. CEQA FINDINGS Replacement of the Plant No. 2 Headworks was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). A supplemental EIR will be needed for the new Headworks. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Alternative 1A and 2A Construction Costs 4. Alternative 1B and 2B Cost Saving Measures 5. Alternative 3 Construction Costs JDH:PK:jo:jak G:\wpAta\agenea\Boara Agenda Reports\2001 Board Agenda Reports\0301\Item 13(n.doc G:AW.ft%pendh OAe0nC0 R.g SoWt BUN Agv a RepwlSZWn11em 13M4M Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 JOB NO. 132-66 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECWTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 57,999 $ 59,736 $ 59,736 It 59,736 $ 59,736 $ 60,109 101% Studies/Permitting $ 92,400 $ 91,124 $ 91,124 $ 91.124 $ 91,124 $ 114,239 125% Consultant PSA $ 360,301 $ 3,489,073 1 $ 3.489.073 $ 649,073 1 $ 649,073 1 $ 421,316 65% Design Staff $ 90,100 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 $ 86,871 27% Construction Contract $ 1.799,600 $ 48,000,000 $ 48.000,000 Construction Administration $ 3.238,000 $ 3,238,000 Construction Inspection $ 1.841,000 $ 1,841,000 Contin enc $ 17,080.067 $ 17,080,067 Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 2,400,400 1 $ 74,118,000 $ - $ 74,118.000 $ 1,118,933 $ - $ 1,118,933 $ 682,535 61% b I4p d1akrg4ob3&wrd=1&%p2 eelp2 65 revlsetl budget table 2.1-01 for M AR rt Professional Services Agreement Status Report Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-66 Total Project Budget: $74,118,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: 811/99 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/1100 Original Preliminary Engineering Report for the design of a $375,000 $375,000 PSA new headworks at Plant No. 2 Additional engineering tasks- sewer hydraulic 9/26/00 1 analyses and phone survey of vortex grit basin $24,940 $399,940 installations Additional engineering tasks—assistance in 9/26/00 2 negotiations with equipment vendors and $24,980 $424,920 preparation of plans and specifications for pilot test equipment 11/15/00 Additional engineering tasks - evaluation of 3 headworks alternatives and assistance during pilot $224,153 $649,073 plant studies Pending Predesign and Design of a new headworks at 4 Plant No. 2 Negotiated Neadklalal lwp.dlalan9UOBS 6 CONTRACTS\P2-661PSANSA SUNe Report adden 4.doc 02/13/01 Revised 05/14/98 , EcaroLLo e n a s n e e r s PROJECT : OCSD PLANT NO.2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT REVISION: 12/28(00 JOB# : 6047A00 BY : JWN/PP ENR: 8,200 ELEMENT : TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ALTERNATIVEIA ALTERNATIVE2A COST ELEMENT NO. DESCRIPTION TOTAL TOTAL SAVINGS S million (S million) ($million) 2 YARD WORK 18.0 17.8 0.2 3 INFLUENT METERING&DIVERSION 7.8 6.9 0.9 4 BAR SCREEN BUILDING 21.7 19.1 2.7 5 SCREENING HANDLING 6.9 6.9 6 INFLUENT PUMPING 23.1 21.3 1.8 7 GRIT BASINS 16.3 16.1 0.2 8 GRIT WASHING AND LOADING 7.2 7.2 9 FLOW SPLITTING &METERING 4.8 4.7 0.1 10 ODOR CONTROL 9.7 9.2 0.5 11 CHEMICAL ADDITION 1.5 1.5 12 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 4.6 4.3 0.3 13 STANDBY GENERATOR 1.8 1.8 TOTAL 123.2 116.5 6.7 H:\Client\OCSD SAO\6047A00\CostEstimates\CostEstSummaries\Alt 2A Orange County Sanitation District Plant No.2 Headworks Replacement, P2-66 Alternatives for Cost Reduction Alternative 1 Rec. Akernafive 2 Rec. Comments (in million$) in million$ Base Project Aft A 123.2 116.5 Cost Cutting Measures 8.1 1 Eliminate metering and diversion. 6.21 N 5.4 N B.2 Eliminate provisions for future 96-Inch sewer. 0.87 N NIA B.3 Reduce bar screenspacing from 1"to 518" 3.6 Y? 3.6 Y? Pilot testing to confirm decision B.4.a Eliminate bridge crane at Bar Screen Building 2.1 N 1.5 N BA.b Do not install two bridge cranes at Bar Screen 0.8 N 0.6 N Building B.5 Reduces ace between screens( W to 6' 0.82 Y 0.58 Y B.6 Do not construct concrete mason buildin s 0.56 N 0.49 N B.7 Do not do screening after pumping Y Y B.8 Eliminate screenings washing. 1.58 N? 1.58 N? Pilot testing to confirm decision 5.9 1 Eliminate one screenings loading bay, 1.96 Y 1.95 Y BAD Reduce number of pumps. N N BA Eliminate check valves. 2.0 Y 2.66 Y B.12 Do not use immersible motors. 1.3 Y 0.9 Y 8.13 Do not use monorails Instead of bridge crane at 0.08 Y 0.08 Y Pump Station 9.14 Do not provide a mix of constant speed and variable 1.47 Y 1,47 Y speed pumps B.15 Reduce aerated grit basin detention time(3 min. 4.1 N 4.1 N See measure B.18 Instead of 5 min. B.16 Reduce grit basin size by eliminating one grit 2.3 N 2.3 N See measure B.18 hopper per basin B.17 Do not use vortex grit basins rated @ 50 m d,each 2.9 Y 2.9 Y See measure B.18 B.18 Do not use vortex basins and rate each for 60 mild 6.5 N 6.5 N Based on ads visits by OCSD staff instead of 50 mgd and mt. Information B.19 Eliminate one grit loadingbay. 1.6 1.8 Y B.20 Eliminate rims Influent meters. 1.4 N 1.4 N B.21 Delete cano over chemical storage. 0.2 N 0.2 N B.22 Reduce size of electrical building. 0.65 N 0.39 N 8.23 Do not use soil filters Instead of packed tower 4.3 Y? 4.1 Y? Decision by another project. scrubbers. Approximate Capital Cost Savings 15.0 14.4 Includes Items wl a"Yes" recommendation onl . Revised Construction Cost 108.2 102 WeadWata1\wp.dtaWngU0BS S CONTRACTSP2-66Womparison table headwo*s aitematives.doc DRAFT J < cciro��o PROJECT: OCSD PLANT NO.2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT REVISION: 1/10/01 JOB# : 6047C00 BY : DJL ENR: 8,200 ELEMENT: ALTERNATIVE NO.3-REHABILITATION ELEMENT NO. DESCRIPTION Rehab New Total E million (E million) (E million) 2 YARD WORK 11.8 16.2 28.0 3 INFLUENT METERING&DIVERSION 0.0 7.8 7.8 4 BAR SCREEN BUILDING 0.0 21.7 21.7 5 SCREENING HANDLING 0.0 6.9 6.9 6 INFLUENT PUMPING 17.6 16.2 33.8 7 GRIT BASINS 6.2 7.2 13.4 8 GRIT WASHING AND LOADING 4.6 4.4 9.0 9 FLOW SPLITTING &METERING 2.9 2.9 5.8 10 ODOR CONTROL 3.7 7.1 10.8 11 CHEMICAL ADDITION 0.0 1.5 1.5 12 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 3.5 3.5 7.0 E13STANDBY GENERATOR 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 50.3 95.4 145.7 H:\Client\OCSD_SAO\6047AOO\CostEstimates\RehabSummary\Rehab PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TO R.BdS. 03/01/01 03/28/Ol AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PD001-16 13iM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR JOB NO. J-40-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, for$147,830; and (2)Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, for a total amount not to exceed $77,830. SUMMARY The 1999 Strategic Plan identified a 20-year Capital Improvement Program for the Orange County Sanitation District (District). To support the Strategic Plan, the District completed a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the environmental impacts associated with proposed projects in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). There are three treatment plant projects currently under design that were included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR, which have significantly changed from the projects described in the EIR, requiring additional environmental review. These three projects are: (1) Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-35-2; (2) Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77; and (3) Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-66. According to CEQA, the District must disclose to the public any changes that were not previously identified or discussed in the EIR. To comply with this requirement, Staff recommends that Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR (SEIR) be prepared. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) is being proposed as a sole source provider due to their expertise and experience as the Consultant responsible for development of the District's Strategic Plan EIR. Engineering is not aware of another firm that is presently capable of preparing an SEIR in a timely manner consistent with the assumptions used to develop the Strategic Plan EIR. Staff has prepared a Scope of Work and ESA has prepared a proposal letter with an estimated cost to complete the work. Staff has negotiated a proposed fee not to exceed $77,830. \VNcmaWllw .dwa genda%BWWW da Repo 54 1BwMn nda BapdMP IWem 13�9)4dc Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY As indicated in the attached Budget Information Table, authorization of$77,830 Is requested for the proposed Professional Services Agreement (PSA) and $44,000 for Staff and material costs. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Authorization of a transfer of$147,500 from the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Capital Improvement Reserve Funds is being requested for Job No. J-40-5. The proposed budget authorization is as follows: Staff& Material $ 44,000 Consultant PSA $ 97,830 Contingency 6,000 $147,830 Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 &2. Job No. J-35-2 The 1999 Strategic Plan identified the need to upgrade Orange County Sanitation District (District)facilities to comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 820 and California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) requirements. However, the extent of construction for the project was not fully known when the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis was performed. In September 1999, Brown and Caldwell completed the Hazardous Area Classification Study for Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The study identified many conditions that met code requirements at the time of construction, but are presently in violation of today's standards. The study provided Staff with uniform documentation showing potential fire and explosion hazard locations throughout District facilities. Code deficiencies were documented and various options evaluated to bring all facilities into full compliance. Under the proposed PSA, the Consultant will analyze environmental impacts associated with the replacement and/or upgrade of equipment necessary to maintain full compliance with NFPA 820 and the latest National Electric Code (NEC) and Cal/OSHA code standards. meameean.y.maaaeamBwm ngeea a wnsvao,Bm,e F1-da eeponsmaomiem,n�y�o« Page 2 v Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 The 1999 Strategic Plan recommended that the Foster Outfall Pump Station (FPS) be rehabilitated to pump effluent to the 78-ocean outfall during peak wet weather emergencies. In December 1999, Carollo Engineers completed a study entitled "Evaluation of Secondary Effluent Pumping at Plant No. 2," which recommended replacement of the existing Foster Outfall Pump Station (FPS) rather than rehabilitation. Under the proposed Professional Services Agreement (PSA), the Consultant will analyze the impacts from construction of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex(EPSA). Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. 132-66 The 1999 Strategic Plan recommended that Plant No. 2 Headworks be rehabilitated. However, upon further review, it was decided to replace the Headworks. The revised Headworks project is documented in the Preliminary Engineering Report prepared by Carollo Engineers. Additionally, Carollo Engineers has prepared an engineering analysis of five Headworks alternatives to confirm the best project from both a technical and economic perspective. The analysis was completed in January 2001. Under the proposed PSA, the Consultant will analyze the impacts of demolition of the existing Plant No. 2 Headworks and construction of the new Plant No. 2 Headworks. ALTERNATIVES Do not issue a Professional Services Agreement (PSA). The 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR)does not support the projects described herein. Without the supplemental environmental analysis, the projects, if constructed, would be in violation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Moreover, the projects may be subject to legal challenges, which may result in projects being difficult or very costly to implement in the future. CEQA FINDINGS The Notice of Determination for the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse on October 28, 1999. The recommended action provides for a Supplemental EIR required for the three projects described herein. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Proposal letter from Environmental Science Associates dated January 29, 2001 AA:jak:jo wggcmulwggvtxgma.9w�ang. Rro�=lB W AWW.F.WgCOgg1g 13(00x Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report JOB NO. J-40-6 R11 IPR ISUDOET REVISED AUT"dkIZED AUTHORIZATION. illidio BUDGET" 90 ST.", Lr Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ - $ Consultant PSA $ 97,830 $ 97.830 $ 77,830 $ 77,830 Design Staff $ 44.000 $ 44.000 $ 44,000 $ 44,000 Construction Contract $ $ - Construction Administration $ $ - Construction Inspection $ - $ - Contingency $ 61000 $ 6,000 $ - PROJECT TOTAL $ $ $ 147,830 $ 147,830 $ - $ 121,830 $ 121.830 $ iReimbursable Costs I I I I I I I 1PROJECT NET 1 $ $ 7$ 147.830 1 $ 147,830 11 $ - 1 $ 121.830 1 $ 121.830 1 $ G\wpAhAengUOSS&CONTFUCTSkST11AT Pl.ANU40-548udget Table J40-5 x1s]IDistncts Professional Services Agreement Status Report Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report for Job No. J-40-5 Total Project Budget: $147,830 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates Start Date of Project: March 28, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Prepare Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic $77,830 $77,830 PSA Plan Environmental Impact Report necessary to address three treatment plant projects that have significantly changed from the projects described in the EIR. G:%wp.dtalengVOBS&CONTRACWSTRAT PLANV40.51PSA Status Report Supplement No 1 EIR.doe 02/05/01 Revised 051W98 Fnvironmenml E A EER6a 4asoaiama January 29, 2001 Mr.David Ludwin Director of Engineering Orange County Sanitation District IOW Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92727-6127 Re: Proposal for the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan for Facility Improvements Dear Mr.Ludwin: ESA is pleased to submit this proposal to the Orange County Sanitation District to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)for the proposed facility improvements. Because of our previous work with you on the District's 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR,ESA is in the best position to efficiently process this follow-on CEQA effort. To provide valuable continuity with our previous effort we will maintain our same project management team;I will serve as Project Director and Tom Barnes will serve as Project Manager for this effort Tom will also handle much of the technical analysis required for this focused review of select project changes and additions and will ensure this subsequent document effectively tiers from the Program EIR and to streamline the analysis. Proiect Understanding The Orange County Sanitation District is proposing to conduct the following projects: the Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2(Job No.P2-66);an Arcs Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2(Job No.1-35-2); and a Secondary Effluent Pumping Plant at Plant No. 2—GOBS Annex(Job No.J-77). The District is proposing to prepare a Supplemental EIR to address these few project additions or changes to provide California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)compliance. The OCSD cenifted a Program EIR on the 1999 Strategic Plan in October 1999. This Program EIR addressed planned projects to maintain the District's mission objectives of providing wastewater treatment for the growing population of Orange County to the year 2020. The new projects as currently planned were not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan. This Scope of Work assumes that the appropriate documentation for compliance with CEQA is a focused Supplemental EIR. The Supplemental EIR will analyze only those design changes that have been developed since the original Program EIR was cenified. A Supplemental EIR is appropriate where there are minor changes with potentially significant effects. A Supplemental EIR must follow the same process for public review and input as occurred for the Program EIR. f?rl Wilshire&mlewrJ,Suirc AXII Ln Anv* .Gli(arnia 1XV11 621)9324.111 Jog 934-13x9 emua:evbaxsuvx.ram 'b ` Enviwnmenwl LV\LA1 A....e ► 4swi•ws Dave Ludwin January 29,2001 Page Two Resources to he Analyzed We have reviewed a draft scope of work prepared by the District and have offered suggestions on revisions that we believe can streamline the effort and focus the scope. Following is a brief summary of the issues we will address in this Supplemental EIR and the task we will undertake to complete this CEQA process. For all issue areas,ESA will carefully review the previous analysis 1999 Strategic Plan Program ERR analysis to determine if the proposed project additions or changes alter the impact analysis conclusions or mitigation requirements previously presented and to clearly describe the nature and extent of change in environmental impact,where this occurs. Where appropriate,ESA will tailor the mitigation measures presented in the 1999 Program EIR to address the site-specific issues associated with these specific projects. ESA will address the following issues: • hydrology and water quality, • geology and soils, • air quality and odor, • noise, • transportationhraffic, • utilities and service systems, • public services, • hazardous materials and public safety, • aesthetics, • construction effects,and • neighborhood effects. Hydrology and Water Quality ESA will evaluate construction methods and the final plans to determine the percentage increase of impervious surfaces. The Supplemental EIR will provide a discussion of the surface drainage proposed and any potential impacts. If significant impacts are found to occur,mitigation measures will be developed to reduce potential impacts. Marine Environment ESA will evaluate the proposed projects' impacts on the need to utilize the 78"Outfall. ESA will assess the projects' affects on peak wet weather operations,treatment,and discharge capacity. No additional marine water quality analyses will be performed for the project. If we confirm that there will be no change in peak wet-weather scenario previously analyzed,then this issued will not need to be revisited. - ESA Fnvironmenml aaienae Azsoziases Dave Ludwin January 29,2001 Page Three Geology and Soils The 1999 Program EIR will provide useful setting information to consider this issue for the new/modified facilities. ESA will review existing information on the project area using California Department of Mines and Geology Maps and Seismic Hazard Maps,and MRCS Geologic Formation Maps, which include information on liquefaction and landslides. ESA will review any new,site-specific geo-technical information supplied by the District. ESA will identify mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Air Quality ESA will evaluate Air Quality in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Handbook(CEQA AQ Handbook),and the Southern California Air Quality Management District(AQMD)Guidelines. Construction activities,which could result in dust and fumes,will be evaluated for their potential impacts. ESA will also assess potential odor impacts from the proposed facilities,particularly the new headworks facility on neighboring land uses and describe odor control measures. Noise ESA will evaluate construction noise levels,based on current,standard,equipment noise generated figures. ESA will identify sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the site. A list of sensitive receptors(as defined in the CEQA AQMD Handbook)will be compiled and evaluated. Mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce significant impacts. Utilities and Service Systems ESA's analysis will assess potential disruption in service while new facilities are being installed. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Transportation/Traffic ESA will assess impacts of construction activities on local traffic volumes. Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Public Services ESA will evaluate the potential impacts any increase in demand for police and fire protection services due to the new Hazardous Area Classification Study. ESA 'EE,i � 4aseaio1.s Dave Ludwin January 29, 2001 Page Four Energy and Chemicals ESA will assess the new Hazardous Area Classification Study to evaluate potential impacts to workers and public safety. Any impacts of construction and re-organization activities necessary to comply with the new Study will be assessed in the EIR. ESA will also review the project components with respect to energy use. Aesthetics ESA will assess the project plans to determine the severity of potential aesthetic impacts to the neighborhood. Building heights,lighting, and exterior architecture will be addressed. Land Use ESA will assess impacts to neighboring land uses of construction activities and hazardous material storage. Population, Employment,and Housing This issue was fully covered in the 1999 Program EIR. ESA will review the project changes and additions to confirm that there will be no appreciable change in the long-term capacity and services levels and associated growth levels previously addressed. Biological Resources ESA will assess impacts of construction on local biological resources including the Santa Ana River,the Pacific Ocean,and local wetlands. The report will briefly assess the wildlife and botanical resources of the urbanized area. No specific biological surveys are planned for this project. Cultural Resources ESA will assess impacts,if any,on cultural resources. ESA assumes that cultural resources were sufficiently addressed in the Program EIR. Construction Effects ESA will provide a detailed analysis of the potential impacts of construction activities,and those impacts directly caused by construction activities. ESA will conduct an evaluation of the plans and activities related to the project and the surrounding area. If any impacts are identified, suitable mitigation measures will be recommended. ESA Scie=oar ,u .ro�. awdaros Dave Ludwin January 29,2001 Page Five Neighborhood Effects The EIR will include a detailed discussion of the neighborhood impacts related to increased traffic,odor,noise,and lighting including the identification of mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts. Neighborhood impacts will be assessed by evaluation of data concerning the potential increase in temporary construction activities on the residential community. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended in the EIR. We believe these to be necessary to fulfill the substantive requirements of the CEQA. Proiect Work Elements Task 1—NOP/Scophrg Meeting/Supplemental EIR Project Description ESA will attend the project kickoff meeting and discuss each element of the project description with the District. ESA will prepare a draft and final Notice of Preparation(NOP)for the Supplemental SEIR. The NOP will describe the components of the project that require CEQA evaluation. ESA will submit one camera-ready copy of the final Notice of Preparation(NOP)to the District. The District will reproduce and distribute the NOR ESA will attend one kick-off meeting with District staff as part of this task. ESA will attend and participate in one public scoping meeting. ESA's Project Director and Project Manager will present information on the CEQA process and facilitate public input. Concurrently,ESA will prepare the detailed Project Description with input from District staff and project engineering consultants. ESA will submit a draft Project Description Chapter and incorporate the District's comments into the Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR document. Task 2—Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR ESA will prepare the Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed project changes,as described above. This Supplemental EIR will be focused only on the changes proposed since the previous Program EIR was certified,and will not revisited other aspects of OCSD strategic plan. The Supplemental EIR will be focused on the relevant issues. A preliminary discussion of the issues associated with each project element are presented above. ESA will evaluate these areas for potential direct effects,as well as cumulative impacts. ESA will prepare a complete Administrative Draft SEIR for District staff review and comment. We will submit 10 copies for review. FSA assumes that the District will assemble staff comments into one master comment document. ESA has budgeted for two meetings with District staff during this task: one to present the findings of the Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR and one to receive and review District comments. ESA rn m" .nmi sd.... 0 Dave Ludwin January 29,2001 Page Six Task 3—Draft Supplemental EIR ESA will incorporate the District staffs comments on the Administrative Draft SEIR in order to prepare the Draft SEIR,which will be released to the public for review. ESA will provide one camera-ready copy of the document to the District for reproduction and public distribution. Task 4—Public Review Process—DEIR Public Meeting ESA understands that the District will take the lead in arranging for public notification and meetings. ESA will attend and participate in one scoping meeting and one public meeting to receive comments on the Draft SEIR. Task 5—Final Supplemental EIR/Findings/MAW ESA will prepare written responses to comments received on the Draft Supplemental EIR. An initial draft will be submitted to the District. ESA will incorporate the District's comments and will provide the District with one camera-ready copy of the Response to Comments and Final Supplemental EIR for reproduction and distribution. ESA will also prepare the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)and draft Findings of Fact for District to be adopted by the Board of Directors at the project approval hearing. The Consultant will prepare draft and final versions of these two documents. Task 6—Project Management ESA's Project Director and Project Manager will maintain close contact with District staff and will oversee contract performance. The Project Manager will provide monthly progress reports and invoices. Task 7-Project Meetings The ESA Project Manager will attend monthly meetings with OCSD staff as necessary for the duration of the project. The Project Manager will also attend meetings to discuss District comments on draft deliverables. The ESA Project Manager and Project Director will also attend the project kick-off meeting,two public meetings,and two hearings with the OCSD Board. One of these hearings would include the certification hearing. Protect Team To ensure technical accuracy and adequacy,and the completion of the work program in a timely and professional manner,team members were selected for their experience with the District and similar projects. ESA will work closely with District staff and Mr.Kris Lindstrom in the preparation of this document. Key members of the project team include: Ms.Leslie Moulton,Project Director. Ms.Moulton will be the Project Director for this project. Ms.Moulton was the Project Director for the Program EIR prepared for the OCSD 1999 Strategic ESA rcience eom Science Asseoioses _ Dave Ludwin January 29,2001 Page Seven Plan and will provide continuity to efficiently prepare the Supplemental EIR. Ms.Moulton is the director of ESA's Water/Wastewater department. Ms.Moulton will provide final review of all sections of the Supplemental EIR and will conduct presentations as needed to the OCSD Board of Directors. Mr. Tom Barnes, Project Manger. Mr. Barnes will be the Project Manager for this project. Mr. Barnes' recent experience has included managing the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports for water supply and wastewater districts. Mr. Barnes was the Deputy Project Manger for the OCSD 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. Mr. Barnes will prepare the project description, air quality,geology,and hydrology sections. Ms. Tamseel Mir, Senior Associate. Ms. Ws recent experience includes preparing land use analysis for regional planning efforts in Southern California. Ms. Mir manages CEQA compliance for municipal clients and local development projects. Ms. Mir will prepare the land use,traffic,and aesthetics portions of the Supplemental EIR. Mr. Christopher Mundhenk, Associate. Mr. Mundhenk's recent experience included preparing public services and utility evaluations for regional planning efforts. Mr. Mundhenk will prepare the noise and public services and utilities sections for the Supplemental EIR. Project Schedule ESA is prepared to begin this scope of work immediately. Assuming a February 1 start date,we estimate a 52-week schedule. The estimated Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR submittal would occur in 21 weeks from the kickoff meeting(June 8);Draft Supplemental FJR release would occur approximately 2 months later(August 10);the 45-day public review would extend to September 25;Response to Comments/Final Supplemental EIR would be published in late November;EIR certification and project approval would occur in December. Estimated Costs We anticipate the project costs not to exceed$77,830. Table 1 provides a detailed break down of project costs. ESA is committed to meeting and exceeding nor clients needs. Please feel free to contact Tom Barnes at 323.933.6111 if you have any questions. Sincerely, �r Leslie Moulton Vice President C' TABLE 1: Cost Estimate - OCSD Supplemental EIR Cost Esthaafe Detail DIRECT 7'OTA 1, LABOR EFFORT COSTS COS'iS s 'fg pp8 a s'S tl R j ig y TASK J B„Id...A nu 5.50.18 f25.25 521.01 331.51 SMAC 519.73 SU.241 39.66 MEI.R ok ORMttlin 1 d B S303 $837,26 1963.99 $425 SI 16A dmi.US.P EIR 0 f0 AO SO.Po 30 NOP 31 0 76 $1 JJ3 fJ 169.11 f/Id6.02 20 f6,J16 Ao' S1 MxO lion 10 $I03 SIp0S.50 35,176.03 $5.176 Admin Ono EIR 21 IN 0 10 40 0 2 0 8 $7143 53021fAA $332J1.0] I.PoO $23.]JS J. P.M Or.A EIR 60 2 16 0 I 3 d 7 $d039 311427.09 $13 569.80 L $U,320 R N'K IIAedn I 1606 f1885.9AnAI EIMIS nAc lA Commenld 8 10 10 I3 f]07f fA M6.1/ f9,111.09 f10.011 r<M01 n0an Mwil.dn Mm 1 S9f6 f1201.91 S391f./1 f3.915 a10u11o.i19nd. And Mnlerinb 3101323Po.61<U Mene <n5 1 ! SUN f2286.11 32SIMOS 51.515 On d ]! 60 92 SJ 130 SA 658.92 U.t61.81 800 SI0,515FFORT Iloan 100 100 6p 1J6rIM ]/ 11 33 914 OSTSISI 3,048 10,100 1,412 1,061 670 1,817 30 523.741 S67,1% 513,905 M 5.1,935 S71.830 N PDC COMMITTEE MeeeRSDate Toed.orob. 3roi101 3128101 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-17 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Project Manager SUBJECT: SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT, JOB NO. J-71-7 (FORMERLY JOB NO. SP-04) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize transfer of all funds from the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. SP-04, to Job No. J-71-7; (2)Approve a budget amendment of $1,586,000 for Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7,for a total project budget of$2,382,000; and (3) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Re, Inc., to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, for an amount not to exceed $359,951. SUMMARY The Engineering Division is now implementing the Design and Construction phase of the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project. The new project designation will be Job No. J-71-7, and supercedes the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Division's project designation Job No. SP-04. The O&M Division has budgeted $796,000, and spent$195,000, installing and testing potential scrubber control and monitoring equipment over the past three years. The proposed control strategy will allow Hydrogen Sulfide (1-12S) and other chemical emission sensors to directly control the scrubbers. Currently, eight units are temporarily installed and in full operation. Four are installed at Plant No. 1 on Scrubbers 4, 7, 9, and 10. Four are installed at Plant No. 2 on Scrubbers H, I, S, and T. The next phase of this project, and the subject of this Agenda Report, is the full- scale implementation of the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project recommended by Engineering and O&M. This phase of the project includes designing permanent monitoring and automation improvements, including H2S and chlorine residual sensors at each scrubber's exhaust stack, and automatic controls for optimum scrubber operation of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 27 scrubbers. Staff solicited proposals for the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), Construction Documents, and Construction Support Services from the G1W.pbUOenEalepOE ABe^pa RepMS2Cal e^arJ ABenpa Repa15Nt01Vlem 1]IM1)Ctt flans H'. Y1p98 Page 1 following five firms: Brown and Caldwell, Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill, Lee & Ro, Inc., and Malcolm Pimie. Lee & Ro, Inc. was the only firm to propose on the project. Staff reviewed the proposal and negotiated with the Consultant on January 18, 2001. The other firms declined to propose on this project because of limited staffing resources at this time. Staff evaluated Lee & Ro, Inc.'s proposals, and their expected level of effort. The number of hours proposed by Lee & Ro, Inc. were reduced by 494 hours, or 11%. After this negotiation, Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for the engineering, design, and construction support services for Job No. J-71-7, with Lee & Ro, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $359,951. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for more information. The design work is estimated to take 24 weeks to complete, and will begin within one month after the approval of the PSA. The construction work is estimated to be completed in June 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Scrubber Monitor and Control Project, Job No. J-71-7, is $2,382,000. Authorization of$359,951 for the Consultant PSA and $1,000 for Project Development are being requested. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000/01 Budget Section 8, Page 9 and 114, under Job No.SP-04) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The current project budget is $796,000 under Job No. SP-04. The Job No. SP-04 budget and remaining funds are being requested to be moved to the newly created project, Job No. J-71-7. Also, a budget amendment of$1,586,000 is being requested to set a total revised budget of$2,382,000. This budget amendment will allow for the design and construction of the Scrubber Monitor and Control project recommended by Engineering and Operations and Maintenance. The budget increase includes $1,000 for Project Development, $280,000 for Consultant PSA, $1,046,000 for a Construction Contract, $39,000 for Construction Inspection, and $220,000 for Project Contingencies. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. GJ"ftrgendarmrd Agenda RepMs0001 Bmrs Agenda Re SWWI%ItM 1(B)dw R.x. B .. Page 2 a� ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background ' The scrubber emissions monitoring program began in 1996. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) solicited interested vendors to demonstrate a monitoring system that could continuously measure Hydrogen Sulfide (1-12S) scrubber emissions and control scrubber chemical additions. Vendor testing was conducted for six months. The Vapex system was the only monitor to meet all criteria for performance, accuracy and reliability. O&M staff unanimously agreed to proceed with design and installation of the Vapex monitors. At the time, it was decided that 16 Vapex units were required, this included one spare. This was assuming that one Vapex unit could effectively control two scrubbers. The project's design and equipment purchase were budgeted for in FY1997-98. O&M elected to manage the project and selected CH2M Hill to perform the project's design. Unfortunately, CH2M Hill underestimated the Scope of Work. Through several meetings and negotiations, it was agreed to release them from designing full automation of all the scrubbers. However, CH2M Hill agreed to automate the six most used scrubbers and design local controls for the remaining units. Meanwhile, O&M purchased 16 Vapex units and temporarily installed four units at each plant. In FY1998-99, the construction documents for the Vapex installations were turned over to the Engineering Department. The Engineering Department reviewed the construction documents and put the project on hold after determining that the Plans and Specifications did not meet the soon to be released Engineering Design Guidelines. Also, during that review period, the Orange County Sanitation District(District) experienced a substantial number of odor complaints at Plant No. 2. Most of the complaints were the result of bleach carryover from the scrubbers. To resolve the bleach issue, O&M investigated options to optimize the bleach chemical feed. In the first quarter of FY2000-2001, O&M determined that ATI chlorine residual monitors meet all the established criteria for performance, accuracy and reliability. Five ATI units were purchased and temporarily installed, including two units at Plant No. 1 and three units at Plant No. 2. Concurrently, information from the Odor Control Master Plan project, Job No. J-71-4, revised the proposed scrubber operational and control strategies to avoid offsite impacts. The revised operational strategy Increases the number of scrubbers needed in full time operation from 6 to 14 at Plant No. 1, and from 8 to 13 at Plant No. 2. The revised control strategy requires that each operational scrubber must have its own Vapex system and an ATI unit where bleach is used, to ensure the offsite G:Mn.01„peMe�BwO ApeMe PepM�VU01 m.ro ApmG W{a =IYM 121n1 W nw.e: viase Page 3 g D impact reductions. Thus, 27 scrubbers will require Vapex units and 15 scrubbers will require ATI units for a successful project. Engineering Design Guidelines Requirements The construction documents prepared by Operations and Maintenance (O&M) in January 1999 were not constructed. The project did not meet the soon to be released Engineering Design Guidelines and O&M wanted to incorporate the installation of the ATI units and additional Vapex units. Thus, it was determined to delay the project's implementation because the project was infeasible as designed. Staff recommends that the project be redesigned to the new engineering design standards and with all the required project elements to allow for a successful project. New Project Scope In July 2000, the Engineering Department developed a new Scope of Work to incorporate the design of the additional Vapex units, the ATI units, and the Engineering Design Guidelines. The new scope also includes a requirement to upgrade and fully automate each of the scrubbers to the existing Orange County Sanitation District (District) standards. The result is a project that includes installing the Vapex and ATI units, upgrading the scrubbers hardware and software controls, installing magnetic flow meters to control source water, installing caustic chemical controllers, and reconfiguring the pH meters. Increased Scope Impacts to the Project Budget The original project was to install 15 Vapex units. From that 15, six scrubbers were to be automated and the remaining nine were to have improved local controls. Based on the results from Job No. J-71-4, the new project will install Vapex units on all 27 scrubbers, install ATI units on 15 scrubbers, and automate all 27 scrubbers. The automation includes upgrading the scrubber hardware and software controls, installing magnetic flow meters to control source water, installing caustic chemical controllers, and reconfiguring the pH meters. The original project budget was $796,000. The revised estimate is $2,382,000. Of this amount, $1,390,000 is necessary for O&M to implement its monitoring project. The remaining $992,000 is necessary to upgrade the scrubbers to the existing District automation standards. Cost-Benefit Analysis The estimated financial benefit of this project includes reductions in Staff time and chemical costs. These are estimated at$377,000 per year. The estimated payback period for the $2,382,000 project Is 6.3 years. GA"AW%,n"�B AW"HepW300t BoaN ApMEa PepeNW901Vlem ulp.aa fto. v e Page 4 e Other project benefits include: (1) More accurate compliance with AQMD monitoring requirements; (2)A reduction in the number of odor complaints from surrounding neighbors; and (3)The project contributes to the area automation and staff reduction goal. Conclusion The project as currently proposed has a payback of 6.3 years. The project will also allow the Orange County Sanitation District(District)to Implement automation goals, reduce chemical usage, reduce staffing effort, and reduce odor complaints. Thus, the project is favorable to the continued economical operation of the District's treatment facilitates and is recommended by Staff for implementation. ALTERNATIVES The project could be cancelled; however, this may lead to additional odor complaints from the treatment's neighbors and increased staffing requirements for compliance monitoring. CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt for CEQA under section 15302. A Notice of Exemption will be filed at the County Clerk's Office during the design phase of this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services JB:jo:jak Gft p.dWagenda\Board Agenda Reports\2001 Beard Agenda Repods\0301\Item 13(h).dec G d.bI-d..M AgeMa ReyMVVOJ,awra npenae nepanswlonuem I]Ihldoc RaN6C° RQ.. Page 5 d BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT JOB NO. J-71-7 (FORMERLY JOB NO. SP-04) 6. �y,`'a 4.7 1,y�it ✓ ' �k 4x r 0.w .s' � 4 'ev 'k�IM�, :; �y� a E8T"ATEO �3TI3u~'�Elf: /6 ariP ° rr '� a �a{UTJ IfiA'�IbN ERPENDiTURE FXI�ENPE`IS: *Jrr� N b 3k S �kf�t 3 N NO J , TO DATE TO M it J'lNU t �ti +t tY'h P :"a s v r, "53'fitf °t ib ,71fA a Project Development $ 4,000 $ 4,000 1 $ 11000 $ 5,000 $' 4,000 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,622 92% aP Studies/Permitting $ 101000 1 $ 101,000 $ 101.000 : $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 44,477 44% fr. Consultant PSA $ 80,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 280000 $ 360,000 $ 359,951 $ 359,951 $ 0% qp� - Design Staff $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 !JJ $ 34,000 $ 34.000 $ 7,029 21% Constructlon Contract $ 422.000 $ 422.000 $ 1.048000 $ 1.468,000 1 $ 422000 $ 422,000 $ 138,799 33% Construction Administration $ 119,000 $ 119,000 $ 119,000 $ 119.000 $ 119.000 $ 78 0% Construction Inspection $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 39.000 $ 41,000 9 $ 2.000 $ 2.000 $ 0% Contingency $ 34.000 $ 34,000 $ 220,000 $ 254,000 $ - $ - 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 796,000 $ 796.000 $ 1,586,000 $ 2.382.000 $ 682.000 $ 360,951 $ 1,042,951 $ 195.005 19% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - $ $ - $ 0% PROJECT NET $ 796,000 $ 796,000 1 $ 1.586.000 $ 2.382,000 $ 682,000 1 $ 360,951 1 $ 1,042,951 $ 195,005 19% hhvyAtelen9tlmme\budget table Farm Revised Oct.4,2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Scrubber Monitoring and Control Project Job No. J-71.7 Total Project Budget: $796,000 Consultant: Lee & Ro, Inc. Start Date of Project: April 12, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Design services for Scrubber Monitoring and $359,951 $359,951 PSA Control Project G.Awp.dtaWngUOeS&CONTRACTSU-71-7 Scrubber Monitoring and Control\PSA SWWa Repod.doc 01/25/01 Revised 05/14/98 U SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL PROJECT JOB NO. J-71-7 (FORMERLY JOB NO. SP-04) Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • CH2M Hill • Lee and Ro • Malcolm Pernie Brown and Caldwell, Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill and Malcolm Pernie declined to submit a proposal. As a result, there was one responsive proposal received on January 15, 2001. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel from January 15 to January 19, 2001. Formal interviews were not conducted. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work --Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. e Lee and Ro's proposal was evaluated. After reviewing the proposal, it was determined that Lee and Ro's proposal is reasonable and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) should pursue a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Lee and Re. The following summarizes the attached results for the 5 firms: 1. Lee and Ro 933 Points 2. Brown and Caldwell Declined to Submit 3. Carollo Engineers Declined to Submit 4. CH2M Hill Declined to Submit 5. Malcolm Pernie Declined to Submit The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Lee and Ro Lee and Ro is positioned well to perform the design work for this primarily instrumentation and control project. Their experience with Job No. J-42, Plant Automation, is very applicable, and they understand OCSD's very detailed and complex design requirements. The addition of an outside expert to design the scrubber controls system is a critical aspect of their project. OCSD was seeking this expertise for the project, and it is a necessity to completing a successful project. Brown and Caldwell. Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill. and Malcolm Perris There were several reasons that the other firms declined to propose on the project. In most cases, the firm's air quality group was interested in the project. However, the company, or its local office, would not be able to support the project at this time. Summary Lee and Ro is the only responsible firm proposing on the project. Their project team, approach, and experience will allow for a successful project and Staff recommends moving forward with the project. JB:jak a9wp.dlnbngUOBS&CONTRACTSU-71-7 Scmbber Monitoring and Conaol\STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL-Am TABLE 1.0 Scrubber Monitor and Control Project Job No. J-71-7 (Formerly Job No. SP-04) STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Lee and Ro Brown and Carollo CH2M Hill Malcolm Caldwell Pernie Reviewer A 207 Reviewer B 208 Reviewer C 253 Reviewer D 265 Total Score 933 1,400 Points Maximum Average Score 233 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 3806 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 40 (Weeks) Proposed Not to Exceed Fee 359,951 Declined to Decined to Declined to Declined to Submit Submit Submit Submit P.O.6ox 93070 Coy a MWsM. G4 917153070 Tel:(M)912'M1 LEE&RO, Inc. FW:MM912-2015 i M SouM Fulled Read, Clry of IMWby, CA 91748 January 22, 2001 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Attention: Mr. David Ludwin,P.E. Director of Engineering Subject: REVISED FEE PROPOSAL for Scrubber Control and Monitor Project, Job No. J-71-7 354 Dear Mr. Ludwin: As a result of the seeping&negotiation meeting with your staff for Job No. J-71-7,LEE& RO, Inc. is submitting a revised fee proposal based on the revised scope work. The scope of the work was modified as follows: Project Element 1 —Collect Data Rod Field Verify District Documentation. We have assumed in our original fee proposal that we would vectorize about 50 scanned drawings for use as the AutoCAD background drawings. However, OCSD instructed us to use the scanned drawings(without vectorization)as the base drawings. In addition, OCSD will make available to us all disks which were produced by CH2M Hill tinder Project 5802400. For this scope reduction, we have reduced the level of effort by 100 manhours and the direct expenses by $6,200. Project Element 6—Install Remote Valve Actuators and Flowmeters (Water Supply Modifications to Scrubber Sumps). Because the utility water supplies at each scrubber complex are arranged somewhat differently,we assumed in our original proposal that we would prepare good as-built documentation and prepare new drawings for both primary and secondary water supplies. The revised scope only requires the modification of the primary water supply and this reduced the level of effort by 80 manhours. Project Element 8—Upgrade Software Controls to Current OCSD Standards. The original scope of the work required us to rewrite the software for the entire scrubber PLCs. During the seeping meeting it was brought to our attention that Job No.P1-46-2 is reprogramming the entire scrubber PLC software. Job No.PI-46-2 will be completed before we modify the P&IDs depicting template software which is to be programmed with this project. Therefore the only control logic diagrams required for this project are the custom logic requirements. Also, we are assuming that all AutoCAD files will be available to us from Job M:VSRARE\PROPOSALW I.propa\01 27mp.lVREV ISEDfee.DOC p No. P1-46-2 and CH2M Hill Project 5802400 as well as the mark-up P1-46-2 P&IDs reflecting as-built conditions and finalized traffic cops showing all PLC signal inputs/outputs. We have reexamined the level of effort based on this scope modification and reduced the level of effort by 434 hours. Process Chemical Engineer(Subconsultant: Tom Card of Environmental Management Consulting)—Per OCSD suggestion,we will employ a subconsultant who will assist us with the design of Vapex and ATI analyzers(See enclosed letter from Tom Card). A total of $17,600 is added to cover the subconsultant's cost. Revised Schedule—Based on the expected notice to proceed on March 28,2001, a revised schedule is enclosed. Based on the above scope modifications,our fee proposal is as follows: CONSULTING SERVICES Including: Burdened Labor(Direct Labor plus 35 %Benefits) $154,588 Overhead at 100% $154,588 Fixed Profit(Includes Overhead and Burdened Labor)at 9% $ 27,825 SUBTOTAL (Consulting Services Including Burdened Labor,Overhead, and Fixed Profit),Not to Exceed $337,001 SUBCONSULTANT FEE $ 17,600 DIRECT COSTS, Not to Exceed, $ 5,350 TOTAL, Not to Exceed $359,951 We look forward to working on this project with you and your staff. Please call Lee Badertscher or me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, LEEEA&RO, Inc. vl M. Steve Ro, P.E. President Encl: Level of Effort Spread Sheet, Revised Schedule, and Subconsultant's Proposal M ISHAREPROPOSAUa I-prop,�D1-02T,oWo.IkREVISEDfa.DOC Scrubber Control and Monitor Project (Job No. J-71-7) JOB 354 January 22,2001 LEVEL OF EFFORT SUMMARY ENGINEERINGLABOR: arlag ng, upery a ng; oure er Labor Cate o Total Labor Other Principal,E5 Senior,E4 Engineer,E3Asaoclete and E2Awistant: " EB EE; -. E6 EO TS. WP Coat . Direct CAD LABOR:T7 Supervising,To Lead,TS Senior,74 CAD;T3,, ,. Overall Coats TOTAL PROJECT Associate CAD..WP-Word Processor- Burdened Labor Rates $/Hour Multiplier - (ODCs FEES ELEMENT ^. Protect Elemei1t13escd tlon -6� $66.15 $59.061 S46.58 $40.16 $35.781 $26.05 .Hours. 2.1800 1 Collect Dala and Field Vedf Disldct Documentation for all Scrubbers 2 20 40 40 40 142 $13,469 $ 800 $14,269 Design Temperature Switches an,Temperature Control Monitoring for 2 all Caustic Pipe Lines Associated with Scrubbers 4 24 80 40 140 a 296 $26,520 $ 500 $27,020 Design Reconfiguration U the pH Meter and Caustic Metering Pump 3 Stroke Control for PLC Control 4 24 80 100 160 161 3114 $33.793 $ 500 S34,298 4 Provide Design to Install Va ez Hydrogw Sulfide Analyzers 4 32 100 8o 220 1s 452 $39,749 $ 500 $40,249 5 Provide Design to Install ATI Wet Chlorine Gas Analyzers 4 32 80 72 120 8 316 $28 792 $ 350 $29142 Provide Design to Install a Remote Manual Valve Actuator and 6 Ma netic Flowmeler to Plant Water Sump Refresh Water Utility 4 241 50 Be 150 6 296 $26.064 $ 500 $26564 7 Upgrade Hardware Controls to Current OCSD Standards 4 20 64 60 80 8 236 $21,483 $ 400 $21.883 8 Upgrade Software Controls to Current OCSD Standards 4 60 . s0 100 470 16 730 $62 613 $ 800 $63.413 9 Sole SourcerBabe Bid'/E ul ment Pre-Purchase Alternatives a 16 8 32 $3 088 $3,088 10 Bid Period Services 8 24 20 20 20 92 8 $ 100 $8,309 11 Construction Stage Services 6 so 200 IN 20 406 $42 09 $ SW S43,439 12 permits a 18 1 1 20 $2 728 $ $2.728 13 Project Coordination 20 20 40 $4749 $ $4749 14 Asset Management Plan 20 80 120 20 240 $23.098 $ 100 $23,198 LEE&RO FEE Subtotal 36 380 030 702 1400 148 3686 $337 001 $5,350 $342 351 Subconsu tent,Environmental Management Consulting(B ling Rate$1301Hour 120 $15.600 $2000 $17600 TOTAL PROPOSED FEE I I 1 1 3806 $352,601 $7,350 $359,951 Burdened Direct Labor Rate Engineering Service Periods Ea '' E7 E5 E4 TS WP Period 1--Nov. 1 2000 to Oct.37 2001 $66.151 $59.06 $45.681 S40.76 $35.78 826.66 Period 2--Nov. 1 2001 W OU.31 2002 $60.80 $61.42 $47.51 $47.77 $37.21 $27.73 Annual Escalation Factor 4.0% 1.04 Fee Multiplier Overhead 100%&PrMtg% 2.18 WSharelProposa0P01-021Pee Proposal LEE & RO, Inc. Pagel of 1 1FeeProposal Environmental Management Consulting January 22, 2001 Mr. Steve Ro Lee &Ro, Inc. PO Box 93070 City of Industry,CA 91848 Dear Mr. Ro: Subject: Proposal for Assistance with OCSD Scrubber Project Based on our telephone conversations I am proposing to assisst you with the OCSD Job No. J- 71-7 Scrubber Monitor& Control Project. I am proposing that I complete the following tasks. Task 1 —Preliminary Workshop It is my understanding that the initial P&ID and Ladder Logic development will take place in a workshop setting with myself, your project team,OCSD staff, and vendor staff. I will develop a two hour presentation for that workshop that covers operational theory and provides descriptions of similar projects. I will then participate with the group in developing P&IDs and ladder logic for each system. Task 2 — Design Support I will be available for consultation to support your teams design effort. I am planning to respond by telephone to design questions. Task 3 — Interim Workshop I will attend a second workshop that will present the initial concepts prior to full completion. Task 4— Final Review I will provide final review of your work product with review comments supplied in a written form. It is my understanding that my effort will not exceed 120 hours. I will bill my expenses at my cost. I am anticipating two trips to the site. My hourly billing rate is$130 per hour. I appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and I am looking forward to working with OCSD and your team. Sincerely, c� Thomas R. Card,PE 100292nd Avenue SE,Fall City,Washington 98024 USA 42SQ22-6531 E-Mail:toM_card@nnsn.com Fax:4251222-6527 REVISED SCHEDULE(01/17101) Figure 1-3: Orange County Sanitation District Scrubber Control and Monitor Project, Job No. J-71.7 Apn12001 May 2001 Jun,2001 JuN 2DO1 lAugust2DOI September 200 ID O Task Name ES 411 4/8 4115 422 42p fie B/13 520 5127 813 S/10&17 824 711 7/8 7M5 7122 72g 815 B/12 BNB 8128 9/2 0/9 p/18 1 Award of Design Contract 2 �. Kick-OM Meeting ♦ONt 3 �i provide Prelknirery,Design Repert(PDR) _... .... --. INP 88 4 � Design CoorMnegce Conference 7(OCC7) ' __. .. ..................... ....._.-.. .. 5 3 RasmMsry 6ji serinp WorkeMp 2(PEV@) .. . . ... . 815 8 3 provide Design Submittal 1(057) WOm BB 7 Design Coordination n Conference 2(D ) .... 618 .....8 OCSDRwNwtl DS1 &n 6120 _ . .. 9 ]r Design Workshop 2(DW2) � 6110 10 3 Provide Design Submittal 2(DS2) ........................... ........ ana 7111 11 Design Cowdkualon Conference 3(DCC!) 7/11 12 �i OCSD RN"of D82. .... 7112 7@ 13 Provide Design Submlttal3(D33) 7126 8/22 14 3 Design Coordination Conference a(DCC4) 15 DCSD Review of D53 .................... .._._.. . .. . . ..... .. .. . . 8 22 6123 86 18 ]r Design Workshop 4(DW4) . . ........... .......... _ .. 17 .]r Final Submittal .... . .. ...._..... .- ... . Bn0 18 Fire)Design coordination Conference rNg Task Design Coordination Conferences . LEE&RO,Inc. OCSD Ravlew Workshops Dale: January 17.2001 Milestone Pape 1.8 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To'_or". 3/01/01 3/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCOI-19 13(1) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jeffrey D. Kidd, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, providing for a change in the name of the Consultant to Tetra Tech ASL and providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $57,679, for a total amount not to exceed $282,479. SUMMARY This project consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on two separate reaches of the existing Warner Avenue Relief Sewer and to relieve deficiencies in the overall sewer drainage basin tributary to that trunk sewer. The 1999 Strategic Plan identified these two reaches of the Warner Avenue Sewer to be hydraulically deficient, and in need of replacement. The 1999 Strategic Plan did not address hydraulic deficiencies in one of the City of Huntington Beach's (City) sewers in Warner Avenue that affects the overall system. Proposed Addendum No. 1 adds the following project elements: • Engineering services to increase the size of the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, currently under design, to accommodate removal and abandonment of approximately 2,700 lineal feet of 21-inch City sewer on Warner Avenue, east of Boise Chica Street. This is needed to improve the hydraulic conditions where the existing Orange County Sanitation District (District) sewer and the City sewer flow into the Slater-Springdale Trunk. The City's trunk sewer on Warner Avenue is parallel and redundant to the District's trunk sewer. Recent videotaping of this reach revealed their pipe to be in poor condition and in need of replacement. This abandonment will improve the hydraulic conditions in the overall system but will require the design of a new junction structure. • Structural engineering services for a pipeline transition structure in the area of Graham Avenue, due to the limited pipe cover in the area. The original Professional Services Agreement (PSA) included only civil and mechanical design services. • Since approval of the original PSA, the Consultant has undergone a change in ownership, resulting in a name change from ASL Consulting Engineers to Tetra Tech ASL. The cost for Addendum No. 1 is$57,679, for a total PSA amount of $282,479. GA,dl g�AOa P SQO`ot SoM n9Mda Reps WWI0 a IX)da Re ssed. MOM Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY , r Refer to the attached Budget Information Table and Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the PSA and this pending Addendum No. 1. As a result of Addendum No. 1, additional facilities will be designed and constructed. At this time, it is estimated that the increase in construction cost, associated with these new facilities is $650,000. The construction cost estimate will be further refined as the design progresses. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Warner Avenue Relief sewer, 11-22, Section 8, Page 44) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The City of Huntington Beach (City)trunk sewer in Warner Avenue and the parallel Orange County Sanitation District (District) sewer serve similar drainage areas. It Is proposed that City and District flows be combined into one sewer for hydraulic efficiency purposes. Recent videotaping of the City sewer in Warner Avenue revealed the pipe to be in poor condition. Hence, it is proposed to abandon the City's sewer on Wamer Avenue, from Boise Chica Street to Springdale Street, and to replace approximately 2,700 lineal feet of City sewer on Warner Avenue west of Boise Chica Street. Preliminary design of the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer includes transitioning from a single pipeline to multiple pipelines in the vicinity of Graham Avenue, due to the limited cover in this area. Structural design of the upstream and downstream structures required for this transition, was not Included in the PSA. ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with Addendum No. 1, Contract No. 11-22 (NO ACTION). The no action alternative could eliminate the implementation of cost-effective collection system improvements, resulting in continued inefficiencies and potential surcharging. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999 and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The Consultant has determined that supplemental environmental work will not be required for this project. G d pale aWda@ua,d Agenda Rep mII eda d Agenda RePv,sk4211 n Item,ggf ax ReneEd a20M Page 2 ATTACHMENTS v 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Consultant Acquisition Letter dated January 10, 2001 4. Additional Work Request Letters (2) dated January 22, 2001 JK.,jak,.jo GAwp.d1a%agendMBoard Agenda Raport5\2001 Board Agenda Reporwo301\Item 13(j).doc d:Mq.aNWmarBwm n ft�001 aw,a Agm a aeyanroNIMIM 130).aac amaaee. ersaee Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-22 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTKASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET 4 REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 10,200 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 46.000 110% Studies/Permitting $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ Sao 5% Consultant PSA $ 215.000 $ 250.000 $ 35.000 $ 285.000 $ 224,800 $ 57.679 $ 282,479 $ 100,000 35% Design Staff $ 176,400 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 110.000 $ 110,000 $ 50,000 45% Construction Contract $ 2,160,500 $ 2,150,000 $ 2,150,000 $ Construction Administration $ 536,100 $ 189.000 $ 189,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 218,000 $ 218.000 $ Contingency $ 929,500 $ 430,000 $ 35,000 $ 395.000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 4,027,700 $ 3,399,000 $ - $ 3,399,000 $ 386,800 $ 57.679 $ 444,479 $ 196,500 44% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4,027,700 1 $ 3,399.000 $ - $ 3.399.000 11 $ 386.800 1 $ 57,679 1 $ 444,479 $ 196,500 44°/a G%"xtt lenVo8S S CONTRACTSU 1 22 Werner Ave.Reliel Sewery11.22 Budget Into Table,lslDislncls Professional Services Agreement Status Report Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Contract No. 11-22 Total Project Budget: $4,027,700 Consultant: Tetra Tech ASL, Inc. (formerly);ASL Consulting Engineers Start Date of Project: 4/1/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/22/00 Original PSA Design Warner Avenue Relief Sewer $224,800 $224,800 Pending Addendum No. 1 Incorporation of 2,700 LF of City sewer into $57,679 $282,479 design, and structural design of pipeline transition structure JK:jak HAwp.dlalengU0BS S CONTRACTSN 1-22 Werner Ave.Relief SeweA11.22 PSA Slalus Repod.doc 01/26/01 V TETPA TECH,INC. m N.NmeerJaw. Peea.b,>edran Silty FAX(M g(eabt e61 a661 Hob FAX(9aB)a51-ezta January 10,2001 To Wbom It May Concem: This is to inform you that Tetra Tech ASL and ASL Consulting Engineers are one and the same cocpncati, Tetra Tech,Inc, acquired ASL Consulting Engineers and ASL Consulting Engineers,ArlzoiW Inc.on June 25, 1999. The two corporations,ASL Consulting Engineers and ASL Consulting Bngm=, Arizona,Inc.,have taken'Tctra Tech ASU as their assumed name. This assumed name has baeo/is being Med in Los Angeles County and Arian and is an extension of their true name. Sinccrety, Richard A.Lemmon TSTRATECR,INC. Emmutive Vie President �n •a Op00E99 'ON Xtld VN30VS8d IS0 Wd 10:20 03M 102-2-Ntlf O TETRATEGH ASL W January 22, 2001 Mr. Chuck Winsor Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Reference: Warner Avenue Relief Sewer,Additional Work Request Convert City's Line in Warner Avenue to OCSD Dear Mr. Winsor: During the preliminary design phase, we have extended significant effort in determining the flow tributary to the OCSD Warner Avenue Relief Sewer. Along Warner,there is an existing OCSD sewer along with a City of Huntington Beach 21-inch sewer. It appears that the Strategic Plan includes Flows for both the OCSD and City tributary areas. Based on our earlier discussions, the new OCSD relief sewer in Warner Avenue is to be designed to accommodate all Flows. This is based on the premise that the OCSD has been asked by the City to clean and maintain all of the City's trunk sewers. During the preliminary design stage, OCSD cleaned and videotaped the City's entire trunk sewer in Warner Ave. This line, as well as the OCSD's existing relief sewer, is in poor condition. As such, a new relief sewer is required. Our current scope of work includes the investigation,preliminary design,final design and construction administration of the OCSD's relief sewer in Los Patos, from Marina View Place to Bolsa Chica Street, Bolsa Chica Street from Los Patos Avenue to Warner Avenue and Warner Avenue from Bolsa Chica Street to Springdale Street, This letter is to request additional scope be added to include replacement of the City's 21- inch relief sewer from our Warner Avenue / Bolsa Chica Intersection, heading westerly approximately 2,700 lineal feel. Based on our review of the area, including this work appears to make good economic sense. This is based on several key factors. These factors include: 16241 Laguna Canyon Road.Suite 200.Irvine,CA 92618 Tel 949.727.7099 Fax 9497271097 ..nice.com O TETRATECH ASL,INC. (Y Mr.Chuck Winsor January 22,2001 Page 2 • This line is in poor condition, creating difficult operations and maintenance for OCSD crews should the OCSD take over these duties for the City. • This poor condition may also lead to OCSD increased liability under new cMOM regulations. • Our limits of work, due to the existing collection system, would be the ultimate beginning of the trunk sewer system. • We have completed all preliminary design hydraulic calculations as part of our original contract. • We can include this scope of work with minimal delays in the overall project schedule. • OCSD can realize an overall capital cost savings by taking advantage of the economies of scale (pay for only one mobilization, bonds, etc. and better unit prices from material suppliers) • Knowledgeable engineering design team available to complete the work in a timely manner. • Utilize existing sewer as by-pass during new construction as well during future cleaning and videotaping of the new sewer. Our scope of services includes additional records research, surveying, topographic mapping, geotechnical investigation,traffic control plans,sewer pipeline plans and appurtenances. The detailed scope of work shall follow the intent of our original scope of work,excepting that the preliminary design report will not be updated nor will any potholing or manhole investigation be completed. Our overall project schedule will be revised once authorization is provided by the OCSD to complete this scope of work. For planning purposes, we anticipate completing the utility research, geotechnical report, surveying and topographic mapping within four (4) weeks of authorization. Once this is done, the final design will begin. We envision our final design adding three(3)plan and profile sheets and sixteen (16)traffic control plan sheets. Assuming additional scope of work authorization is given February 5, 2001, the overall project schedule would be adjusted from March 23, 2001 to May 4, 2001. We feel this is a minor delay when compared to the overall benefit that will be realized by OCSD. To complete this additional work, we request the authorization for the following not to exceed budget amount: v O TETRATECH ASL,INC. Mr. Chuck Winsor January 22,2001 Page 3 Consulting Services Including: Burdened Labor $12,100 Overhead at 170% $20,570 Profit(includes overhead and burdened labor)at 10% $ 3,267 Subtotal -Consulting Services including burdened labor,Overhead and profit, not to exceed $35,937 Subconsultant Services Subconsultants Topographic Mapping $ 4,040 Geotechnical Investigation $ 9.880 Subtotal, Subconsultants $13,920 Direct costs,not to exceed $ 100 Total,not to exceed: $49,957 As always,please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or desire any additional information. Sincerely, �,,,�/ Tom Epperson, P.E. Project Manager RSA/tic 1:U663`a002Voot1c-ma.doc(300) OTETRATECH ASL January 22,2001 Mr.Chuck Winsor Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Reference: Warner Avenue Rellef Sewer,Structural Additional Work Request Dear Mr. Winton As previously discussed in our monthly report and our last monthly preliminary design report meeting,our current design includes transitioning from a single pipeline to multiple pipelines in the vicinity of Graham Avenue. This transition is due to the limited cover in this area. Based on our analysis, the final design will consist of a single 21-inch pipeline transitioning to a triple 18-inch pipelines back to a single 36-inch pipeline. During our preparation of the preliminary design report, we have discussed the transition structure with OCSD operations and maintenance staff. In general, the structure shall be constructed of cast-in-place concrete, with each line able to be isolated. Isolation shall be achieved by use of FRP or redwood stop logs. When in use, the stop logs shall sit within a stainless steel embedded channel. Our preliminary design indicates the need for a 6400t by 7-foot upstream structure and a 6-foot by 8-foot downstream structure. The walls will be approximately 4-foot and 5-foot tall,respectively. We have currently completed the design of similar transition structures for the Archibald Relief Sewer Project. As such, we are very familiar with the detailed design characteristics such as: manway entry, sufficient spacing between stop logs for constmetability and overall strength,stop log size to allow ease of installation and removal, materials of construction and hydraulics. All structural design will be completed by in-house staff. Based on our original proposal,we did not anticipate the structural design of these structures. We did anticipate the need to detail each manhole. As such,we have budget to complete the civil/mechanical design of these structures. Thus, we are requesting approval for the following compensation. 16241 Laguna Canyon Road.Sulu 200.Irvine,CA 92618 Tel 949.727.7099 Fa.949.727.7097 wv wasloe.00 n OTETRATECH ASL,INC. q Mr.Chuck Winsor January 22,2001 - Page 2 Transition Structure Structural Design consisting of seven(7)sheets: Burdened Labor $2,600 Overhead at 170% $4,420 Profit(includes overhead and burdened labor)at 10% S 702 Total,not to exceed: $7,722 As always,please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or desire any additional information. Sincerely, Tom Epperson, P.E. Project Manager RSA/tic ).U663\0002V003dcna.doc(300) PDC COMMITTEE MesUng Date To ad.of DI" 3/01/01 3na/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-18 13(II Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF COVEY LANE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-14-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Establish a budget of$90,000 for Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station, Contract No. 7-14-4. SUMMARY The Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD) constructed the Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS) in the early 1990s, making it possible for the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)to redirect flows eastward by gravity, and abandon a series of nine pump stations built in the 1960s. Of these nine pump stations, all have now been abandoned except the Covey Lane Pump Station. Recently, the land east of Covey Lane Pump Station has been subdivided and development is finally proceeding. OCSD needs to acquire an easement and construct a gravity sewer across a parcel of land prior to the development being finalized. With construction of this gravity line, the Covey Lane Pump Station can be decommissioned. IRWD has already reserved capacity in HATS for this additional flow. An agreement has been in place since 1992, allowing this exchange of flow with IRWD. The gravity sewer construction and cost will be incurred by the land developer. OCSD will be responsible for overall design, project coordination, and pump station abandonment costs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total proposed FY 2000/01 budget for the Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station, Contract No. 7-14-4, is $90,000. This includes: Project Development $5,000 Project Design $22,000 Construction Contract $35,000 Construction Administration $7,000 Construction Inspection $14,000 Contingency $7,000 $90,000 Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Now that the land east of Covey Lane has been subdivided, a land developer is beginning to install sewers and other improvements. The project is being budgeted now because it is necessary to abandon the pump station prior to improvements to the subdivided land being completed. As part of the land development, the developer will install the sewer east of Covey Lane and incur the costs for installation. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will contract for the remainder of the work. The design work is limited and will be done by OCSD staff. The design work will consist of the sewer work, the pump station abandonment work, and extensive project coordination with the land developer, the City of Tustin and Irvine Ranch Water District. The contract work by OCSD will be limited to the pump station abandonment work. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS The project is covered in the previously approved 1989 Master Plan/EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table LAR:jak:jo G9wp.dtaWgendalBoard Agenda Repods12001 Board Agenda Reports10301%em 13(q.dx BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station CONTRACT NO. 7-14-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 0% Studies/Permi0in $ - $ $ Consultant PSA $ - $ $ Design Staff S 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22.000 $ 0% Construction Contract $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ Construction Administration $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ Construction Ins action $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ Conlingen $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ - PROJECT TOTAL $ - Is - $ 90.000 1 $ 90,000 Is - Is 27,000 1 $ 27,000 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ 90,000 1 $ - $ 27,000 1 $ 27.000 1 $ 0% H:\wp.dtaleng%JOBS&CONTRACTW-14-4 Coveyt-rjBudget Table7-14-412-29.00.y1s]Dislrlcts 61wp.dta%enggm,ns%budgel table Fan Revised Oct.4,2000 v DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 14,2001 at 5:00 p.m., In the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Shirley McCracken, Chair Shawn Boyd James W. Silva John M. Gullixson Roy Moore STAFF PRESENT: Joy L. Neugebauer Jerry Sigler Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair David Ludwin,Director of Engineering Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & OTHERS PRESENT: Maintenance Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Director Steve Anderson Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Director Pat McGuigan Jeff Reed, Human Resources Supervisor Director Peer A. Swan Mike White, Controller Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Greg Mathews,Asst. to the General Manager Tom Dawes Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Bill Tappan Wes Bannister Toby Weissert (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the February 14, 2001 Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. i v' e; Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ` Page 2 March 14,2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reported staff held a meeting with the ocean outfall group who have been speaking at the board meetings against applying for a new 301(h)waiver. This meeting covered financial topics and the group is still convinced the District should do full secondary treatment of all wastewater. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources, Lisa Tomko, reported Johnson &Associates had signed the compensation and classification study contract and would be in attendance at the next FAHR committee meeting to discuss how they plan to proceed with the study. Ms. Tomko also referred the Directors to a confidential memorandum distributed that evening which is the fourth update on the Performance Based Evaluation and Compensation Committees (PBECC). The Local 501 PBECC is close to agreement and the Supervisory and Professional Management Team PBECC will be discussed in closed session. (9) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, reported there would be a series of articles on the groundwater replenishment system from political, technological and environmental points of view. It was also reported that the last meeting of the Technical Advisory Group on the Huntington Beach contamination investigation for summer 2001 would be held on Friday, March 15, and calls have been placed to the media to attend. Some positive progress has been made with the citizens of Yorba Linda who will be Impacted by the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor project. Two of the residents have agreed to be a part of a citizens'advisory group to participate in staffs reevaluation of the alternatives Included within the environmental impact report, and to help identify the impacts to their business and residential community. More residents will be asked to serve on the citizens' advisory committee. During the week of March 19, a letter will be mailed to the residents explaining the District's reevaluation process. V Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 March 14,2001 (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff indicated a need to add an additional item to the Closed Session, needing Immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the Agenda. He reported that an additional Item could be added pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)upon a two-thirds'vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To add Agenda Item No. 17(a)(2), pursuant to authority of Govemment Code Section 54954.2,to authorize discussion and consideration of the following item which arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda and which requires action at this time, to wit: Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000002012 (Government Code Section 54956.9). (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. FAHR01-08: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2001. b. FAHR01-09: Receive and file Certificate of Participation(COP)Monthly Report. C. FAHR01-10: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 1,2001. d. FAHR01-11: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases In amounts exceeding $50,000In accordance with Board purchasing policies. e. FAHR01-12 Recommend approval to the Board of Directors of the substitution of the Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Lloyds TSB Bank PLC for the existing Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Barclays Bank PLC. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a)through (a) under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR01-13: Consider implementing the sanitary sewer service charges previously adopted for 2000-01, continuing to collect said charges as a separate line Item on the County property tax bill, and adjusting the Class I and Class II Permit User rates to reflect the adopted sanitary sewer service charge component rates. Gary Streed gave a brief report on sewer service charges and the method of collecting those charges on the property tax bill. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. v Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting , Page 4 March 14,2001 b. FAHR01-14: Cancel the regularly scheduled July 11, 2001 Committee meeting and reschedule for August 8, 2001. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. (13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR01-15: Review of Cost Impacts on OCSD of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)and other hydraulic relief options Gary Streed reviewed the charts included with the agenda report,which describe the cost impacts on the District by implementing the GWRS project or other possible alternatives. Directors entered into discussion on the pros and cons of approving the GWRS project at the District's next Board meeting. b. FAHR01-16: 2001-02 Budget Assumptions Update This item was not discussed. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1) and (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 17(a)(1)and (2). At 7:51 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. W Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 March 14,2001 (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:51 p.m. Submitted by: �NVV Penny M. K I FAHR Committee Secre G:Iwp.delpnaM1'AIIRiFAHFNM113Wf f10]rlpr raurNM.ena BOARD OF DIRECTORS Me Ijng Date To old or W. 0314/01 03/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number FAHROI-08 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2001. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G%ry,dwNgendalBmrd AgenE Repa0 001 Board Agenda RepMS nikllem14(c1am Reused: WWO Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts February 28,2001 Yield(%) Slate of Calif. LAIF $ 18,843,079 6.2 Union Bank Checking Account 347,909 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,030,000 4.84 PIMCO—Short-teen Portfolio 34,480,050 5.8 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 375,941,291 4.1 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1.752 5.8 Debt Service Reserves w/rruslees 35,633,622 5.5 Petty Cash 8,000 N/A TOTAL A467�8F 76z ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC GJxy E,akagende%Board Agenda R.dans rl eaard Agenda RdddnsWglntem 41c)dac RaNlad'. 8Q09n Page 2 Prepared by Finance, 3/13/01, 10:48 AM Monthly Treasurer's Report District Fund Balances $450,000,000 IIIIIIIIII umum IIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,, IIIIIIIIII •iiiii •iii0•. ..... .,,,... ..... ..... ■ ......•.. . ❖.• :.:.:.:.:. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .......... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ., 00„ Oct, „ Nov, „ Dec, 00 Jan, , M Debt Service Reserves ULAIF IG Bank 0 , MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2001) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $34,871,708 • Mellon $34,882,932 Historical Cost: • PIMCO S34,687.,921 • Mellon $34,820,392 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $80,205 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturin within 90 days: 70% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averse Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.44 0.43 3 Months: 1.76 1.49 12 Months: 6.87 6.05 Year-to-Date: 1.12 0.95 Commenmry Interest rates at the shomrnd of the yield curve declined in February(three-month T-Bills down 14 basis palms to 4.95%),a did the longer maturities(30-year Treasuries down 19 basis points to 511%). The Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 1 basis point for the month,and by 17 basis points year-to-dale. PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and shoe-term notes enhanced returns. G:IxpbnlanUMlxNblTrtwxyMgm,WQ0.9W.F[aaI.RPT.6x MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LNVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2001) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $378,843,490 • Mellon $379,692,717 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $368,436,615 • Mellon $371,800,040 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.16 Oflndex: 2.24 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( ain/loss)of 1%Change: $8,183,019 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 30% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.85 0.78 3 Months: 3.38 3.72 12 Months: 10.91 10.78 Year-to-Date: 2.01 2.24 Commentary • Three-month yields decreased in February(90.dey,T-13111s down 14 basis points to 4.85%)as did longer maturities(5-year Treasury Holes down I I basis points to 4.65%). • The Long-Tenn portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 7 basis point in February,but legged the benchmark by 23 basis paints year-mate. • PIMCO's slightly shorter-Nan-Index duration was negative for performance as rates fell during the month. • A broader-Nan-index maturity mix had a positive impact on performance as exposure to long maturity holdings outperformed inlemmdiale holdings. • An underweight allocation to the corporate sector enhanced resume as corporates lagged Treasuries. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities were negative for performance a this sector underperformed Treasuries. ci.ym,n"urewum.•.,yeymmu.roeouee°cxrr.� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 28-FEB-2001 FINAL L/QUlD OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 5,022,704.45 5,022,704.45 14.40% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN IYR 5,049,842.79 5,049,942.79 14.48% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 3,271,112.00 3,271,112.00 9.38% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,421,095.41 6,421,095.41 18.41% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 2,381,450.00 2,381,450.00 6.83% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 192,060.93 182,060.93 0.52% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,328,265.58 22,328,265.58 64.01% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 22,328,263.58 64.01% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 1,961,812.56 1.873.678.10 5.37% 11,965.54 BANKING&FINANCE 8,532,775.70 8,573,505.25 24.58% 40,729.55 INDUSTRIAL 202,730.00 202,842.00 0.58% 112.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,845.00 500,010.00 1.43% 4,165.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 99Q082.20 1,001,749.50 2.87% 5,667.30 TOTAL UNITED STATES 12,089,245.46 12,151,794.85 34.84% 62,539.39 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 12,0O9,545. 3 .1 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 40Z881.41 402,881.41 1.15% 0.00 TOTAL 40Z881.41 402,881.41 1.15% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 1.41 402,881.41 1.15% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 34,820,392.45 34,882,931.84 100.00% 62,539.39 13-Mar1001 7:51:37 Exec Wive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: / BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF177522202 28-FEB-2001 FINAL LONGTERMOPER-P/MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -7,131,648.00 -7,131,648.00 .1.88% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 4,052,125.33 4,052,125,33 1.07% 0.00 PAYABLES -30,086,637.45 -30,086,637.45 -7.92% 0.00 TOTAL -33,166,160.12 -33,166,160.12 -8.740/6 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 58,505,226.28 58,505,226.28 15.41% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,593,882.12 1,593,982.12 0.42% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 60,099,108.40 60,089,108.40 15.83% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS fun-loam 26, 22, �28 7.09% FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 14,511,562.50 15,351,975.00 4,04% 940,312.50 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 33,272,444.91 34,580,304.05 9.11% 1,307,859.14 U.S.AGENCIES 119,623,974.07 124,140,315.20 32.69% 4,51M41.13 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 35,947,839.13 36,219,326.58 9.54% 271,487.43 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 13,229,563.74 13,416,820.10 3,53% 188,256.36 FHLMC POOLS 7,499,992.63 7,457,264.11 1.96% -42,728.52 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,633,320.00 4,581,035.30 1.21% -5Z284.70 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,000,000.00 3,021,900.00 0.80% 21,900.00 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 2,199.71 $200.40 0.00% 0.69 ABS:HOME EQUITY 78,850.51 78,086A5 0.02% -764.06 MUTUALFUNDS 1,000,000.00 999,180.00 0.26% -820.00 BANKING&FINANCE 69,637,488.75 68,980,335.98 19.17% 342,847.23 INDUSTRIAL 10,404,091.00 10,431,666.00 2.75% 27,575.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 11,134,330.00 11,168,720.00 2.94% 34,390.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,311,388.00 1.93% 11,388.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,541,100.00 1.99% 43,845.00 G.O.CITY/MUN1 1,723,280.00 1,907,300.00 0.50% 194,020.00 HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,829,525.35 0.48% 199,051,30 /3-M.rv200/ 752:49 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 EASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 28-FEB-2001 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL UNITED STATES 341,125,666.00 349,018,342.52 91.92% 7,892,676.52 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 349,OtS,34231 91� OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,751,425.71 3,751,425.71 0.99% 0.00 TOTAL 3,751,425.71 3,751,425.71 0.99% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS —————— ,751, 71 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 371,500039.99 379,692,716.51 100.00% 7,992,676.52 13-Mar-2001 7:52:49 Executive N rkbeacA YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 2001/02/28 RUN DATE 03/06/01 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME f 12.56.27 PAR VALUE VTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD a-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS 182.D60.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 5.331 AAA 100.000 102,060.93 .81 996085247 AAA 182,060.93 .53 900,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 5.010 .000 93.095 880,155.00 3.94 2546ROV72 08/07/2001 880,155.00 2.55 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.214 .000 P-1 98.370 2.065,552.22 12.38 313589F57 MAT 05/12/2D01 A-1+ 2,765,552.22 8.02 900.000.00 VERIZON GLOBL FOG DISC 5.215 .000 90.355 808,798.75 3.98 92344ASM2 05121/20DI 889,790.75 2.58 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL BOLO: LN MTG CORP DISC 5.291 .000 P-1 99.220 2,381,450.00 10.66 313397ELl HAT 04/17/2002 A-1# 2,381,450.00 6.91 2,3D0,000.00 FEDERAL HOW LN BIG CORP DISC 5.332 .000 P-1 99.206 2,201,749.50 10.21 313391DP3 MAT 03/27/2001 A-1s 2,201,749.50 6.62 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.452 .000 P-1 93.953 891,577.00 3.94 36959HT64 06/D6/2001 881,593.00 2.56 900.000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.510 .000 P-1 98.031 880,576.00 3.92 13443ARG2 04/16/2001 080,576.00 2.50 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 5.513 .000 P-1 99.965 )90.916.6) 3.54 075SOM98 04/09/2001 790,916.67 2.29 100.000.OD BECTON DICKINSON DISC 5.526 .000 P-1 98.622 98,622.36 .44 0258811088 04/25/2001 98,622.36 .29 3,000,OOD.OD FEDERAL NAIL BIG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.571 .000 P-1 98.317 2,961,500.00 13.26 313509DR1 MAT 03/29/2001 A-la 2,961,500.00 8.59 1.000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HIS CORP DISC 5.610 .000 P-1 90.936 909,362.50 4.43 313393DB4 MAT 03/15/2001 A-l♦ 969,362.50 2.87 700,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTH ASSN DISCOUNT 5.618 .000 P-1 99.149 694,043.19 3.10 313589DB6 HAT 03/15/2001 A-l+ 694,043.19 2.01 600,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 5.126 .000 P-1 99.010 594,058.67 2.66 590183QP2 03/23/2001 594,058.67 1.02 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSP07511102 2001/02/20 RUN DATE : 03/06/01 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 6.293 .000 P-1 97.112 5,049,842.79 22.61 912395GC9 04/19/2001 DD 10/19/00 A-1+ 5,049,842.79 14.65 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.261 .092 22,328,265.58 100.00 22,328,265.5E 64.33 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 200,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BE CONS BUS 5.395 5.489 AAA 100.203 200,106.00 1.64 3133MSBC3 5.500% 08/13/2001 DD 08/13/90 AAA 200,406.00 .58 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 400642 5.543 5.273 A3 99.500 438,583.20 3.60 17120QJ36 5.250% 10/22/2001 DO 10/22/98 A- 438,108.00 1.22 400,000.DO FEDERAL MOMS IN BE CONS BUD 5.356 4.969 AAA 100.120 390,312.D0 3.29 3133M6R63 4.975% 11/23/2001 DO 11/23/98 AAA 400,490.00 1.16 820,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BE CONS BOB 5.885 5.569 AAA 100.203 818,442.00 6.76 3133MSDS6 5.580% 08/17/2001 DD O8/17/98 AAA 821,664.60 2.38 75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BE CONS BUD 5.973 6.452 AAA 100.750 75,271.50 .62 3133MCAE8 6.500% 09/28/2001 OD 09/20/00 AAA 75,562.50 .22 500,000.00 GNAC MTN 000309 6.22E 5.399 A2 100.009 498,260.00 4.11 37042NRT0 5.8OD8 04109/2DD1 DD 04/00/98 A 500,045.00 1.45 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN ITS, 00016 6.568 6.560 Al 101.218 500,268.50 4.16 44922YAR9 6.640% 10/29/20DI OD 10/29/99 A+ 506,090.00 1.47 IOD,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN MT CORP DEBS 6.576 6.401 AAA 100.609 99,892.00 .82 3134AOSP3 6.440% 08/21/2001 DO O8/21196 AAA 100,609.00 .29 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 6.830 6.938 Al 100.890 700,707.00 5.81 002061U.44 7.0000 DB/15/2001 DD DS/20199 A+ 706,230.00 2.05 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 6.844 8.866 A2 101.508 448,219.20 3.67 345330AY6 9.DU08 09/15/2001 DO 09/15/91 A 446,635.20 1.30 1,002,000.00 MORLDCOM INC SR NTS 6.845 6.127 A3 99.975 991,O92.20 8.24 90155KA79 6.125% 08/15/2001 DO 08/11/98 BBB+ 1,001,749.50 2.91 1,000,000.00 IRANSAMERICA FIN CORP NTS 6.863 6.332 A3 100.696 995,534.00 9.28 893502BS2 6.375% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/96 A- 1,OO6,860.00 2.92 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07511102 2001/02/28 RUN DATE : 03/06/01 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RON TIRO: 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTRL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL 500,D00.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 4TR 00006 6.899 6.170 A3 100.002 495,845.00 4.11 90269QAF6 6.170% 03/06/2D01 DO 03/06/98 A- 500,010.00 1.45 2DU.000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC ITS 6.943 5.731 A3 100.333 197,772.00 1.65 42333MJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09725/98 A- 200,666.00 .58 200,000.00 BURLINGTON US INC NT 6.960 8.381 A3 101.421 202,730.00 1.66 122014ADS 8.500% 10/01/2001 DO 10/17/91 A- 202,842.00 .59 250,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN CORP NEW SUB 6.984 9.259 Al 101.250 254,730.00 2.08 16163ABL1 9.375% 07/01/2001 DO 0I/01/B9 A+ 253,125.00 .73 275,000.00 FEDERAL MOM6 LN BX CONS BOB 7.058 5.141 AAA 99.984 270,789.06 2.26 3133M6EA2 5.140% 05/02/2001 DO 11/02/98 AAA 274,956.00 .60 500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORP MTN 000081 7.316 6.714 A3 100.537 496,495.00 4.13 06600QDJ4 6.750% 08/09/2001 DO 08/09/96 BBB+ 502,685.00 1.46 1,000,000.00 ARISTAR INC SR NT 7.346 7.712 A3 100.491 1,003,830.00 8.26 04D42DAT8 7.050% 06/15/2001 DO 00/07/94 A- 1,004,910.00 2.91 1,000,000.00 FLEET/NORSTAR FIRL GROUP INC 1.365 9.795 A3 101.071 1,024,020.00 8.31 339018AD5 9.900% 06/15/2001 DO 06/24/91 A- 1,010,710.00 2.93 575,000.00 FCC NAIL BE DE MTN 4 TR OD284 7.426 6.373 AA2 100.031 570r262.00 4.73 30241NMV4 6.375% 03/15/2001 UO 03/14/96 A+ 575,178.25 1.67 420,000.00 BAMKAMERICA CORD SR NT 7.441 6.634 AA2 100.234 417,034.80 3.46 066050CJ2 6.650% 05/01/2001 DD 05/01/96 A+ 420,982.80 1.22 I,OOD.000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN 6 JEN M00011 7.530 6.102 Al 100.128 987,060.00 9.23 25766CALB 6.110% 05/15/2001 DO 05/27/98 A- 1,001,280.00 2.90 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6.508 6.381 12,089,245.46 100.D0 12,151,784.85 35.24 ________ _______ ----------------- ________- TOTAL 5.823 2.929 34.41I.511.04 100.00 34,480,050.43 100.00 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 MSM7522202 2001/02/20 RUN DATE t 03/06/01 DISTRICT3 LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE . 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT RODDY MEET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MEET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CAB- 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS 1,400,000.00 SECTOR DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 97.960 1,371,640.00 2.20 07588RUN6 07/17/2001 1,371,440.00 .34 200,OaO.0O DISNEY HALT CO DISC .000 .000 97.395 195,590.00 .32 2546ROV72 OB/03/2001 195,590.00 .05 230,000.00 SO PONT DE NENOUR DISC .000 .000 P-1 98.BGS 227,388.73 .37 26354ASA3 05/10/2001 227,360.73 .06 2,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 90.405 2,558,530.00 4.25 36959ST64 06/06/2001 2,558.530.00 .63 7,400,000.00 NOTOROLA INC DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.125 I,335,232.61 12.20 620ORARL5 04/20/2001 7,335,237.67 1.39 1,600,000.00 USAA CAP COUP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.040 1,584,353.I8 2.63 90328ARA6 04/25/2001 1,584,753.70 .39 600,000.00 VCRISON GLOBL PUG DISC .000 .000 98.I55 592,532.50 .98 92344ABN2 OS/21/2001 592,S32.50 .14 1,583,882.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CUB NGRT .000 5.331 AAA 100.000 1,583,982.12 2.63 996005247 AAA 1,503,082.12 .39 7,268,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.371 .000 P-1 98.313 I,145,413.0I 11.89 63743CS07 05/24/2001 7,145,413.07 1.35 600,000.00 CANTRELL Bo" CO DISC 5.428 .000 P-1 98.194 509,162.33 .98 13443ASX4 05/31/2001 589,162.33 .14 4,900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.484 .000 P-1 99.379 4,069,585.97 8.10 63743CQDB 03/13/2001 4,869,525.97 1.19 19,000,000.00 GENERAL BLEC CAP DISC 5.602 .000 P-1 98.941 18,798,073.67 31.2E 36959UMO 04/25/2001 18,798,873.67 4.60 1,700,000.00 ANERICAN BE CA CP DISC 6.381 .000 P-1 9B.563 1,675,643.72 2.38 02591ROMS 03/21/2001 1,675,643.72 .41 10,600,000.00 NOTOROLA INC DISC 6.403 .000 P-1 97.923 10,390,306.17 13.23 62000M68 04/06/2001 10,300,306.17 2.54 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF00522202 2001/02/28 RUN DAM 03/06/01 DISTRICT: TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY RABBET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL 1,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.443 .000 P-1 98.393 1,180,768.67 1.96 36959HQM2 03/21/2001 1,180,760.67 .29 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2.905 .192 60,009,108.40 100.00 60,089,108.40 14.31 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GRUA I SF HIS .000 6.502 AAA 99.969 14,447,968.75 4.15 OIN062631 6.500% 03/15/2031 AAA 14,495,505.00 3.54 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GUM SF HIS .000 7.362 AAA 103.063 14,405,000.00 4.13 O1N080633 8.000E 03/15/2031 AAA 14,428,820.00 3.53 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC GLOBAL NT .000 5.885 A2 100.250 899,721.00 .25 073902BQO FLTG RT O0/01/2D02 DD 07/29/99 A 902,250.00 .22 1,200,000.DO COMMIT TO FOR GNMA II JORDON .00D 7.371 AAA ID1.750 1,221,000.00 .34 21HO72635 7.500% 03/20/2031 AAA 1,221,000.00 .30 3,000,000.00 DAIRIES CHRYSLER NA COUP NT .000 7.3I4 A3 99.671 3,000,000.00 .85 233835AM9 FLTG RT 12/16/20D2 DO 12/15/00 A 2,990,130.00 .73 266,834.75 FBLMC GROUP 470-6064 .000 6.321 AAA 100.797 260,330.67 .03 31348SW93 6.384E O1/01/2028 DO 12/01/90 AAA 268,961.42 .03 1,168,836.96 GNRA II POOL 60000395 .000 6.443 AAA 100.891 1,158,244.27 .33 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 1,179,251.20 .29 9,504,876.09 GRUA II POOL 400040OX .000 6.443 AAA 100.891 9,408,342.89 2.74 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 9,589,565.24 2.34 .00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 .000 A2 .000 .00 .00 44181KXA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO O6/24/98 A .00 .00 .00 LEBMAN BROS RIDGE HIS .000 .000 A2 .000 .00 .00 5253IP0O0 FLTG AT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A .OD .00 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARTS CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.592 100.730 3,000,000.00 .06 831641DD4 6.640E 02/01/2011 3,021,900.00 .04 8,909,054.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.715 3.562 AAA 101.I81 8,874,235.80 2.59 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2DO2 DO O7/15/97 AAA 9,067,724.25 2.22 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 6 0CSF07522202 2002/02/20 RUN DATE t 03/06/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 12.59.27 ..... ..........................................................................=..........=.........====............._..._. PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 9-P PRICE NARHET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- - ---- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 25,259,980.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.813 3.342 AAA 101.000 24,398,209.11 3.30 9128272M3 3.305% 01/15/2007 DD O1/15/90 AAA 25,512,539.SD 6.24 1,998,017.60 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY ELDON INF 4.702 3.639 RAI IOD.359 1,062,936.55 .54 39549BBG1 3.650% 02/14/2002 DO 01/14/97 A 1,904,831.48 .43 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.261 6.429 A3 101.734 1,438,920.00 .40 81240QGW6 6.5401 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,424,236.00 .35 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.54E 5.723 AAA 109.125 2,179,375.00 .62 912010E07 06.250% 08/15/2023 DO D6/15/93 AAA 2,182,500.00 .53 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTH 5.650 6.400 AR 101.567 1,543,215.00 .43 D46003HY8 6.5001 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,523,505.00 .33 3,950,000.00 GRAC NTH 5.752 5.599 A2 98.409 3,910,768.50 1.11 370425WS FLTG AT 08/18/2003 DD 09/17/90 A 3,967,155.50 .95 1,000,000.00 HELLBA FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.360 5.731 A3 100.333 9" 330.00 .28 42333HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/96 A- 1,003,330.00 .25 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 000570 5.335 6.900 A2 100.124 999,180.90 .28 44181KET4 FLTG AT 00/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,OD1,240.00 .24 3,OOQ,OOO.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.849 6.5D9 A3 101.859 3,073,170.00 .87 81240QJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,055,330.00 .35 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORD GLOBAL NT 5.891 6.037 Al 99.336 1,992,800.00 .57 066365DW4 FLTG AT O5/11/2003 DO 05/11/90 A- 1,994,720.00 .49 .05 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1534 E 5.912 5.913 99.281 .OS .00 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 .05 .00 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY MTN CARE SER B 5.942 5.050 AAA 94.063 1,630,434.05 .52 64579ERMO 4.350% 07/01/2020 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,029,525.35 .45 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTN ASSN DEAN 5.967 6.661 AAA 106.969 16,154,410.00 4.35 31359MFH1 3.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 16,580,195.00 4.05 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTN ASSN MTN 5.981 5.906 AAA 100.234 14,955,300.00 4.30 3136462VO 5.820% 02119/20D1 DO 07/19/99 AAA 15,035,100.00 3.66 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.328 AA3 100.747 2,526,725.00 .32 59018SXP4 6.335% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,518,675.00 .62 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 MSF07522202 2001/02/28 RUN DATE 03/O6/O1 DISnICTt LOMO-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE t 12.56.27 ...............s...===..=.v==.==.__.=....................a....v..=..____=====v=v..v.vv..=v=vv..........v=va PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET 'TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,000,ODO.00 MONTGO RENT ALA SW MR. 9 6.001 5.243 AAA 95.365 1,723,290.00 .54 613041GH9 5.0001 11/15/2029 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,907,300.00 .47 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUT9 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.967 RA2 100.548 7,497,255.00 2.16 079867AXS 6.0001 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/99 AAA 7,541,100.00 1.06 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.644 A2 101.593 3,038,250.00 ,S7 059165DN7 6.750% 12/15/2002 DD 22/20/00 A 3,047,790.00 .74 2,000,000.00 RAHKWSTON CORP SR ETA 6.133 6.067 A2 100.960 1,9Y9,600.00 .57 06605TAL6 6.1254 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 2,019,200.00 .49 0,500,000.00 U 6 TNEASURY SONDE 6.134 6.312 AAA 138.625 12,332,187.50 3.77 91281ORGO 08.7504 08/15/2020 DO 08/15/90 AAA 13,169,375.00 3.22 1r500,000.00 CHRYSLER PINL LLC MTN IM00615 6.154 6.110 A3 99.031 1,499,415.00 .42 1712000SC PLTG AT 08/08/2002 DO 04/00/98 A+ 11485,465.00 .36 1,700,000.00 HONORS STANLEY MTN ITR 00311 6.190 5.711 AA3 100.203 1,699,517.20 .48 61745ENY3 FLTG AT 01/28/2002 OD 01/27/00 RA- 11703,451.00 .42 2,199.72 FIFTH THIRD SR AM TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.190 AAA 100.031 2,199.71 .00 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 2,200.40 .00 1,000,DOD.00 POPULAR INC MTN OTR 00004 6.201 6.205 Al 99.910 1,000,000.00 .20 73317PADI 6.2004 04/30/2001 DD.04/21/99 BBB+ 909,180.00 .24 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO TERM ENHANCED 6.221 6.212 A2 99.968 1,998,613.60 .57 345397WO FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/98 A 1,999,360.00 .49 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DENS 6.271 6.100 Al 100.023 2,994,300.00 .85 209111CUS FLTO AT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 3,000,690.00 .73 78,850.51 GASES TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.352 AAA 99.D31 70,950.51 .02 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 76.086.45 .03 4,500,000.00 FRDERAI, NATL RIG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.146 AAA 101.359 4,488.7U5.00 2.30 31364CKV5 6.2301 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,561,155.00 1.11 30000,000.00 SELLER FINL MTN ITR 00246 6.300 5.87A A3 99.656 3,000,000.00 .85 42333BLP7 PLTG RT 04/20/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,989,6E0.00 .73 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MEAN ACCEP ITR 00562 6.303 5.574 A2 99.531 3,793,958.00 1.06 37042NSK0 FLTG AT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/00 A 3,782,179.00 .92 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 8 MSF07522202 2001/02/28 RUN DATE 03/06/01 DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 12.56.27 .....vvnvvnevvevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvnvvevvnevvna=aeneevevicevvvvvvvcccvcccv PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT HOODY MERIT TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NAMET VALUE % TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,629,556.18 FHLHC NULTICLPSS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.998 AAA 93.236 2,632,431.95 .33 3133ME95 VAR AT 08/15/2033 AAA 2,556,875.25 .62 2,292,395.83 ONM GTD RENIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 6.353 AAA 100.460 2,292,395.83 .65 3937H4NY9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,302,940.85 .56 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.620 A2 101.965 2,031,960.00 .50 073902AHI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 2,039,300.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CR CO GLOBAL LANDHAM 6.350 6.394 A2 99.131 3.000.000.DO .85 34539ISR5 FLTG RT D3/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 A 2,975,130.00 .23 2,000,000.00 FORD NTR CA CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 5.551 A2 99.718 1,992,580.00 .57 345390RV3 MID AT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/90 HR 1,994,360.00 .49 24.146.94 GNMA POOL 10500917 6.389 6.113 AAA 90.256 22,920.73 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 23.1D1.60 .01 74,256.00 GUM POOL 00506636 6.389 6.113 AAA 98.156 70,485.95 .02 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 72,887.50 .02 921,971.45 GUM POOL 10503388 6.389 6.113 AAA 98.156 075,152.59 .25 36210VF55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AM 904,91D.30 .22 26,360.06 GNMA POOL 00499153 6.389 6.113 AAA 90.156 25,029.01 .00 36210WE5 6.0000 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 25,882.62 .01 22.000.98 GNNA POOL 60496284 6.390 6.113 AAA 98.156 21,548.20 .00 3622OW51 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 22,292.37 .01 897,968.92 GRUA POOL 00496461 6.390 6.113 AAA 90.156 852,360.93 .25 36210MON4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 801,410.37 .22 245,466.17 GNMA POOL #0491103 6.390 6.113 AAA 90.156 233,001.09 .04 36210FRY4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 240,939.10 .06 25,760.19 GUM POOL 60486720 6.390 6.113 AAA 98.156 24,452.06 .00 36210AVN6 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/90 AAA 25,205.17 .01 44,410.63 GUM POOL 00497343 6.390 6.113 AAA 99.156 42,163.00 .01 362IONP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/90 AAA 43,599.55 .01 49,057.22 GUM POOL 10469680 6.391 6.113 AAA 98.156 46,566.04 .01 36209EXRB 6.000% 11/15/2028 DO 11/01/98 AAA 40,152.60 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSF07522202 20D1/D2/28 RUN DATE f 03/06/01 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 12.56.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION RODE YIELD S-P PRICE RAPIST VALUE 8 TOTAL 54,077.15 GNM POOL #0467279 6.391 6.113 AAA 98.156 51,331.05 .01 36209CCQ3 6.0008 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/98 AAA 53,079.97 .01 95,242.55 GNMA POOL 00457814 6.391 6.113 AAA 98.156 80,913.82 .02 362DBQ5B3 6.000% 10/15/2D28 DD 10/01/58 AAA 03,670.68 .02 893.075.52 GUM POOL #0467286 6.391 6.113 AAA 99.156 847,724.03 .25 36209CCK2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 1D/01/98 AAA 076,607.21 .21 927.885.54 GUM POOL 00465555 6.392 6.113 AAA 98.156 880,766.35 .26 36209M48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 910,775.33 .22 34,087.64 OHM POOL 00483452 6.392 6.113 AAA 98.156 32,356.62 .00 36209MV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 33,459.06 .01 903,043.12 GNMA POOL #0465546 6.392 6.113 AAA 98.159 853.185.46 .25 36209AET3 6.ODO% 08/15/2028 OD 00/01/98 AAA 886,391.00 .22 865,554.58 GUM POOL #0460339 6.392 6.113 AAA 98.156 821,600.64 .24 36209DHQO 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/90 AAA 849,593.75 .21 46,697.24 GNMA POOL #0438057 1.393 6.113 AAA 98.156 44.325.89 .01 36203PTN9 6.000E 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 45,836.14 .01 46,330.86 GUM POOL 00469330 6.393 6.113 AAA 98.156 43,978.12 .01 36209DHF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 45,476.52 .01 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL NOUN LN BE CONS BDS 6.404 6.598 AAA 104.203 29,443,671.00 8.68 3133MBY84 6.875% 08/15/2003 DO 08/07/00 AAA 30,323,073.00 2.41 2,000,000.00 FHLHC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.496 6.422 AAA 101.208 2,000,890.00 .5I 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 2,024,160.00 .49 2,546,427.36 FHLNC MULTICMSS CTF SEE 16203 6.499 6.674 AAA 89.905 2,390,287.42 .65 3133T11A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 2,289,365.52 .56 2,000,000.00 HILLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 6.507 3.023 A3 100.072 2,000,000.00 .57 423328BKO FLTG RT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/99 A- 2,001,440.00 .49 2.000.000.00 SALOMON SB ELDON MTH 6.625 5.844 M3 100.062 2,000,000.00 .53 79548EEEB FLIG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 A 2,001,240.00 .49 7,129,282.55 FHLMC GROUP IG5-0436 6.628 6.942 AM 100.042 7,239,661.96 2.05 312ODD055 7.DOOA 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AM 7,188,302.69 1.76 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 10 MSF07522202 2001/02/28 RUN DATE a 03/06/01 DISTRICTi LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RABBET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLOGS MTN TR 00333 6.672 7.262 A2 100.536 2,322,379.00 .66 52517PPWS FLTG AT 04/01/2002 DD 03/29/99 A 2,312,328.00 .57 1,507,684.58 GNMA II POOL 4DBDDBBM 6.305 6.307 AAA 101.0I8 1,540,665.19 .43 36225CC20 7.335% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 1,523,937.42 .33 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOM IN MTG CORP USES 6.711 6.285 AAA 100.234 10,323,D75.00 3.01 3134A3TC0 6.300E 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,524,570.00 2.59 2,000,000.00 MARES 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.719 6.434 A2 102.962 1,992,200.00 .59 511148A88 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,059,240.00 .50 3.ODO,DOO.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.339 6.601 A2 101.381 2,995,080.00 .83 3453996J3 6.300% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 A 3,041,430.00 .74 9D0,D00.0D FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS ADS 6.393 6.631 AAA 101.797 899,550.00 .26 3133MAQJI 6.750% 02/01/2002 DD 02/01/00 AAA 916,173.00 .22 5,450,000.00 CIT GNP INC MTN 4SR 00042 6.810 6.954 Al 99.640 5,450,000.00 1.55 12560PBT9 MID AT 09/13/2002 DD 09/01/00 A+ 5,430,380.00 2.33 7,000,000.00 J P MORGAN CHASE 6 CO GBL NT 6.843 6.658 Al 101.323 6,953,300.00 2.03 46625HAJ9 6.3504 02/01/2011 DO 01130/01 At 7,096,390.00 1.73 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE MOMS LNS INC NT 6.866 6.688 A3 102.417 2,498,400.00 .I3 22233UABB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,560,425.00 .63 7,300,000.00 ONEOR INC NEW NT 6.96D 6.222 A2 100.156 7,300,000.00 2.09 683680AJ2 MID AT D4/29/2002 DD 04/24/00 A 7,311,388.00 1.79 1,103,042.25 GNMA II POOL /0080023 6.992 7.482 AAA 101.906 1,121,311.39 .32 36225CA29 7.625% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,124,066.24 .27 1,923,092.44 GNMA DID REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 3.014 6.512 AAA 101.279 1,920,013.62 .55 3837H3C70 3.000% 12/20/2022 AAA 1,947,678.66 .48 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK HIM SB 00001 0.004 7.524 A2 99.396 7,000,000.00 2.00 63962KAA6 VAR AT 11/01/2DO5 DD 04/28/00 A- 6,385,720.00 1.71 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN UEBS 7.113 6.222 AAA 1D6.469 2,030,133.00 .64 32359MEYS 6.625E 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,235,849.00 .55 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 9.512 8.190 BAA3 100,117 2,151,250.00 .59 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 2,002,340.00 .49 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 11 CCSF07522203 2001/02/28 RUN DATE t 03/06/01 DISTRICTt LOHO-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 12.56.27 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT ROODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION POOR YIELD G-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,290,693.80 GREYSTONE GVCRG CORP PEA 095-0 7.564 7.562 AAA 98.250 1,279,720.69 .36 398100AE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 OD 02/29/00 AAA 1,275,966.66 .31 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 9.582 6.661 A2 101.337 965,170.00 .29 345399GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 1,013,330.00 .25 969,300.51 NNP/PUNTOON PAIRS A000-11150 7.694 3.663 AAA 93.828 948,248.51 .27 302998GE3 7.5004 12/01/2D30 DD 10/21/99 AAA 948,248.51 .23 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD NTH 0TR 00115 9.909 7.024 A2 103.930 2,950,530.00 .89 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,117,900.00 .76 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG MEN NTH 7.024 6.500 AAA 100.000 32,498,400.00 10.08 31364GYJ2 6.500E 03/12/2009 DD 03/12/99 AAA 35,200,000.00 8.60 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR HT 7.967 7.343 Al 107.252 1,594,032.00 .49 020002AL5 0.805% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 AF 1,716,032.00 .42 ________ _______ ---------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.164 5.943 341,125,666.00 100.00 349,018,342.52 85.32 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.138 5.825 401,214,I74.40 100.00 409,107,450.92 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. I PORTFOLIO DETAIL O0000010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 18,669.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASII MGMT 01-Feb-2001 -18,668.53 996095247 01-Feb-2001 18,668.53 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 18,668.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2001 -18,668.53 996085247 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 207,159.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2001 -207,159.63 996085247 01-Feb-2001 207,159.63 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 207,159.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2001 -207,159,63 996085247 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Feb-2001 -2,281,749.50 313397DP3 MAT 03/27/2001 01-Feb-2001 2,281,749.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 01-Feb-2001 -2,281,749.50 313397DP3 MAT 0327/2001 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 01-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar2001 7:57.30 Execwwv Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Feb-2001 -200,000.00 99377V207 05.420%02/052001 DD02M 02-Feb-2001 200,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Feb-2001 -200,000.00 99377V207 05.420%02/05/2001 DD 02/021 02-Feb-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 02-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,264,665.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2001 -12,264,665.83 996085247 05-Feb-2001 12,264,665.83 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,264,665.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2001 -I2,264,665.83 996085247 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 09-Feb-2001 12,979,550.00 0259IRPLI 02/20/2001 09-Feb-2001 12,978,550.00 B AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 09-Feb-2001 -12,978,550.00 025BIRPLI 02/202001 09-Feb-2001 0.00 FC AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 09-Feb-2001 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,700,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 12-Feb-2001 -5,693,058.67 38142TPL3 02/202001 12-Feb-2001 5,693,058.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 Executive Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,700,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 12-Feb-2001 -5,693,058.67 38142TPL3 0220/2001 12-Feb-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12-reb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2001 -5,500.00 996085247 13-Feb-2001 5,500.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2001 -5,500.00 996085247 13-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 13-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,190.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2001 -35,190.00 996085247 13-Feb-2001 35,190.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,190.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2001 -35,190.00 996085247 13-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 13-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 101,841.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2001 -101,841.96 996085247 14-Feb-2001 101,841.96 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 101,841.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-200I -101,841.96 996085247 14-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 14-reb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 Fxecutive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocSG00010o00 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 55,186.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2001 -55,196.25 996085247 15-Feb-2001 55,18C25 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 55,186.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2001 -55,186.25 996085247 15-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 15-Feb-2001 -2,599,595.56 91130TPG7 02/16/2001 15-Feb-2001 2,599,595.56 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 15-Feb-2001 -2,599,595.56 91130TPG7 02/I62001 15.Feb-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,470.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2001 -41,470.00 996085247 16-Feb-2001 41,470.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,470.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Feb-2001 41,470.00 996085247 16-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 16-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,402.64 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCF 16-Feb-2001 -54,402.64 996097094 I6-Feb-2001 54,402.64 B 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57.30 Ex tow Worh4ewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocS000ol0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-Feb-2001 2,558,530.00 36959HT64 06/06/2001 16-Feb-2001 2,558,530.00 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-Feb-2001 -21559.530.00 36959HT64 06/062001 16-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 16-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 57,325.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2001 -57,325.78 996095247 20-Feb-2001 57,325.79 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 37,325.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 20-Feb-2001 -57,325.78 996085247 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 233,575.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 20-Feb-2001 -233,575.41 996085247 20-Feb-2001 233,575.41 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 233,573.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 20-Feb-2001 -233,575AI 996085247 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Feb-2001 -2,765,552.22 313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 20-Feb-2001 2,765,552.22 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED[NCO 0.00 13-Mar.2001 7,57:30 Exe=lfw Wo kbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000lo000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Feb-2001 -2,765,552.22 313589FS7 MAT 05/172001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,400,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,335,237.67 62008ARL5 0420/2001 20-Feb-2001 7,335,237.67 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,400,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,335,237.67 62008ARL5 042W2001 20-Feb-2001 O.OD FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -1,584,753.78 90328ARR6 04252001 20-Feb-2001 1,584,753.78 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -1,584,753.79 90328ARR6 04252001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,131,648.00 36959HRRO 04252001 20-Feb-2001 7,131,648.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,131,648.00 36959HRRO 04252001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:57:30 &wuaw Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURTTY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Feb-2001 -3,000,000.00 9937SH092 05.440%02212001 DO 0220/ 20-Feb-2001 3,000,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Feb-2001 -3,000,000.00 9937SH082 05.440%02212001 DO 02201 20-Feb-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,131,649.00 36959HRRO 04252001 20-Feb-2001 7,131,648.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-Feb-2001 -7,131,648.00 36959HRRO 04252001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,220.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 21-Feb-2001 -3,220.00 996095247 21-Feb-2001 3.220.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,220.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2001 -3,220.00 996095247 21-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 2I-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 230,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 21-Feb-2001 -227,388.73 26354ASA3 05/102001 21-Feb-2001 227,389.73 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:57.30 Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 230,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 21-Feb-2001 -227,398.73 26354ASA3 05/102001 21-Feb-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,443.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2001 -71,443.06 996095247 23-Feb-2001 71,443.06 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,443.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2001 -71,443.06 996085247 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FC - 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 22,617.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 23-Feb-2001 -22,617.92 996085247 23-Feb-2001 22,617.92 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 22,617.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Feb-2001 -22,617.92 996085247 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 VERIZON GLOBL FDG DISC 23-Feb-2001 ,592,532.50 92344ASM2 05212001 23-Feb-2001 592,532.50 B MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED[NCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 VERIZON GLOBL FOG DISC 23-Feb-2001 -592,532.50 92344ASM2 05212001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 23-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:57:30 Executive WWbewh• ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BECFON DICKINSON DISC 23-Feb-2001 -1,371,440.00 07588RUH6 07/17/2001 23-Feb-2001 1,371,440.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 23-Feb-2001 -1,371,440.00 07588RUH6 07/172001 23-Feb.2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 VERJZON GLOBL FDG DISC 23-Feb-2001 -888,798.75 92344ASM2 05212001 23-Feb-2001 998,798.75 B MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 VERIZON OLOBL FDO DISC 23-Feb-2001 ,888,798.75 92344ASM2 05212001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 PC MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED INCO 23-Feb2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 23-Feb-2001 -2,381,450.00 313397EL1 MAT 04/172001 23-Feb-2001 2,381,450.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Feb-2001 -2,381,450.00 313397ELI MAT 04/172001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 23-F6-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 23-F0.2001 -890,155.00 2546ROV72 08/072001 26-Feb-2001 880,155.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57.30 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 23-Feb-2001 -195,590.00 2546ROV72 08/072001 26-Feb-2001 195,590.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C OVO LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 23-Feb-2001 -880,155.00 2546ROV72 08/072001 26-Feb-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC 23-Feb-2001 -195,590.00 2546ROV72 08/07/2001 26-F6-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 19,569.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Feb-2001 -19,569.00 996085247 26-Feb-2001 19,569.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 19,569.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Feb-2001 -19,569.00 996085247 26-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,028.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Feb-2001 -45,028.06 9196085247 27-Feb-2001 45,028.06 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,028.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Feb-2001 45,028.06 996085247 27-F6-2001 0.00 FC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 Executive Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,645.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 27-Feb-2001 -35,645.50 996087094 27-Feb-2001 35,645.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42.336.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2001 42,336.11 996085247 28-Feb-2001 42,336.11 B O.W LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,336.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 28-Feb-2001 42,336.11 996085247 28-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Jan-2001 -2,060,000.00 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 16-Jm-2001 12,364,687.50 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 -12,364,697.50 BC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 16-Jm-2001 -12,364,687.50 OIN0W25 8.0000/.02/152030 20-Feb-2001 12,364,687,50 D SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 16-Ian-2001 -12,364,687.50 OIN080625 8.000%02I52030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-200/ 7:37:30 Fecawi Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Jan-2001 1,222,171.99 21H072627 7.500%02202031 20-Feb-2001 -1,222,171.88 BC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-Jan-2001 -1,222,171.88 21H072627 7.500°h02202031 20-Feb-200I 1,222,171.88 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-1an-2001 -1,222,171.89 21H072627 7.500%02202031 20-Feb-2001 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 18-Jan-2001 -3,499,062.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG I8-Jan-2001 -10,969,062.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 80064 31-Jan-2001 -447,566.53 17120QJ36 5.250%10222001 DD 1022/9 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS&ELEC CO 314 2001 -3,063,562.50 059165DN7 6.7501%12/152002 DD 1220/0 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 05-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mw2001 7:57:30 Executive o kbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATEJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 09-Feb-2001 .10,962,197.50 OIN062631 6.500%03/152031 22-Mar-2001 10,962,187.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 12-Feb-2001 -3,485,781.25 OIN062631 6.500%03/152031 22-Mar-2001 3,485,781.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR ONMA II JUMBOS 12-Feb-2001 -1,221,000.00 21HO72635 7.500%03202031 22-Mar-2001 1,221,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Feb-2001 -12,348,750.00 OIN080633 8.000%03/152030 22-Mar-2001 12,349,750.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2001 -2,056,250.00 OIN080633 8.0001/.03/152030 22-Mar-2001 2,05C250.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 14-Feb-2001 -3,000,000.00 831641DD4 6.640%02/012011 21-Feb-2001 3,000,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARTN CFFS SBIC-PS 0 14-Feb-2001 -3,000,000.00 831641DD4 6.640%02/012011 21-Fcb-2001 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 21-Feb-2001 0.00 PAY UPS 13-Mar-2001 7.57:30 Ewcuriw Wmkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDA7ED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,668.70 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb-2001 -12,668.70 3133T17A4 6.000%I I/1512023 DD I I101/9 01-Feb-2001 12,668.70 PU 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -20,078.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2001 20,078.12 996085247 02-Feb-2001 -20,078.12 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -20,078.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Feb-2001 20,078.12 996085247 02-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 02-Feb4001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 49,487.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2001 49,487.745 996085247 05-Feb-2001 49,487.76 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -49,487.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2001 49,487.76 996085247 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2001 200,000.00 99377V207 05.420%02/05/2001 DD 02W 05-Feb-2001 -200,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 13-A1ar-2001 7:57:30 acemiv orkbeeoh' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2001 90.33 99377V207 05.420%02/052001 DO 02W 05-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2001 200,090.33 99377V207 05.420%02/052001 DD 02/02/ 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 05-Feb-2001 197,989.44 912795GC9 04/1912001 DO 10/19/00 05-Feb-2001 -194.224.72 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 3,763.72 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 05-Feb-2001 197,988.44 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,80Q000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 05-Feb-2001 2,769,445.78 38142TPC3 02/122001 05-Feb-2001 -2,769,445.78 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21800.000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 05-Feb-2001 27,532.55 38142TPC3 02/122001 05-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 05-Feb-2001 2,796,979.33 38142TPC3 02/122001 05-Feb-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Moo-2001 7:5E30 Executive Workbewk ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,471,981.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Feb-2001 12,471,881.08 996085247 09-Feb-2001 -12,471,881.08 s 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,471,881,08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Feb-2001 12,471,881.08 996085247 09-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 09-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58.377.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2001 58,377.56 996085247 12-Feb-2001 -58,377.56 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58,377.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2001 58,377.56 996085247 12-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 12-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,006.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2001 169,006.34 996085247 15-Feb-2001 -169,006.34 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,006.34 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I5-Feb-2001 169,006.34 996085247 15-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,402.64 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 20-Feb-2001 54,402.64 996087094 20-Feb-2001 -54,402.64 S 0.00 13-Mo 2001 7:57:30 &ecutiw wkb..h' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOOOl0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FED-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -218,111.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2001 218,111.56 996085247 21-Feb-2001 ,218,111.56 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,218,111.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2001 219,111.56 996085247 21-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Feb-2001 3,000,000.00 99378H082 05.440%02212001 DD02/20/ 21-Feb-2001 -300,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Feb-2001 453.33 99378H082 05.440%02212001 DD 0220/ 21-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Feb-2001 3,000,453.33 99378HO82 05.440%02212001 DD 02201 21-Feb-2001 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Feb-2001 2,374,470.00 313397DB4 MAT 03/152001 23-Feb-2001 -2,374,470.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Feb-2001 18,396.67 313397DB4 MAT 03/152001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 l3-U.,2001 7'57 30 &emrtiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000lo00o 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Feb-2001 2,392,866.67 313397DB4 MAT 03/15/2001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -184,756.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-FeW001 184,756.67 996085247 26-Feb-2001 -184.756.67 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -184,756.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 26-Feb-2001 194,756.67 996085247 26-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 BANK ONE CORP DISC 26-Feb-2001 987.403.00 0642AOPU5 02/2912001 26-Feb-2001 -987,403.00 S BANC ONE CAP MKTS INC,COLUM 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 BANK ONE CORP DISC 26-Feb-2001 12,321.00 0642AOPU5 02/28/2001 26-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 BANK ONE CORP DISC 26-Feb-2001 899,724.00 0642AOPU5 02/29/2001 26-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BANC ONE CAP MKTS INC,COLUM 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,645.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 28-Feb-2001 35,645.30 996087094 28-Feb-2001 -35,645.50 S 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 13-Marv2001 7:57;30 F,ecwwe LMorkbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' AGE 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000l0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 09-Feb-2001 10,975,937.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/1$/2031 20-Feb-2001 -10,968,232.76 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 7,704.74 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 09-Feb-2001 10,975,937.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/152031 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 12-Feb-2001 1,222,359.38 21H072627 7.500%0220/2031 20-Feb-2001 -1,222,171.98 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 187.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 12.Feb-2001 1,222,359.39 21H072627 7.500%02202031 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 12-Feb-2001 3,490,019.53 OIN062623 6.500%02/152031 20-Feb-2001 -3,489,892.24 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 127.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 12-Feb-2001 3,490,019.53 OIN062623 6.500%021152031 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Feb-2001 12,352,265.63 OIN080625 8.000%02/15/2030 20-Feb-2001 -12,364,017.86 S SALOMON BROS MG NEW YORK -11,752.23 13-Marv2001 7:57.30 Eeeeattm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Feb-2001 12,352,265.63 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON'BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 14-Feb-2001 2,056,718.75 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 -2,060,669.64 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY .3,950.89 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 14-Feb-2001 2,056,718.75 OIN090625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDOS MTN 20-Feb-2001 2,006,540.00 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/122002 DD 12/071 23-Feb-2001 -2,000,000.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 6,540.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 20-Feb-2001 28,975.56 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/122002 DD 12/07/ 23-Feb-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 20-Feb-2001 2,035,415.56 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/122002 DO 12/07/ 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM CO MTN 26-Feb-2001 3,981,600.00 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06242003 DD 0624/ 01-Me 2001 -4,000,000.00 S MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO -18,400.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 Ewaatlw Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOW10000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN 26-Feb-2001 47,813.33 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 0624/ 01-Mar-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,244.65 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Jan-2001 9,244.65 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2029 DO 12101/ 01-Jan-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -603.23 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 0000-11150 01-Jan-2001 603.23 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 10/2119 01-Jan-2001 -590.13 PD 13.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .603.23 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE M00D-11150 014an-2001 603.23 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Jan.2001 0.00 PC 09-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .19,889.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 15-1an-2001 19,889.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Jan.2001 -19,910.75 PD -21.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,675.50 F14LMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-1an-2001 35,675.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-1an-2001 -35,714.52 PD -39.02 13-Mo 2001 7:57:30 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SE7TL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILAM LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,675.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jan-2001 35,675.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Jm-2001 0.00 FC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,623.29 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Feb-2001 48,623.29 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 021011 01-Feb-2001 49,383.03 PD -759.74 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,623.29 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Feb-2001 48,623.29 3128DDQ55 7.00D°.502101/2003 DO 021011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52.24 ONMA POOL#0438057 01-Fcb-2001 52.24 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2001 49.59 PD 2.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52.24 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Feb-2001 52.24 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152029 DO 05/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -215,748,77 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Feb-2001 215,748.77 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DD 051011 01-Feb-2001 -213,557.57 PD 2,191.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -215,748.77 GNMA lI POOL N080408X 01-Fal*2001 215,749.77 36225CN28 6.50D%0520/2030 DO 051011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 20-Fab-2001 0.00 13-Mar.2001 7:57.30 EeecuNw mkbeacb' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: h PORTFOLIO DETAIL OC3G000l0000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,092.58 GNMA II POOL OD080395 01-Feb-2001 37,092.58 36225CNM4 6.500%04/202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -36,756.43 PD 336.15 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,092.58 GNMA it POOL N0090395 01-Feb-2001 37,092.58 36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 416.87 GNMA POOL40486720 01-Feb-2001 416.87 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-rob-2001 -395.70 PD 21.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 416.87 GNMA POOL 40486720 01-Feb-2001 416.87 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-reb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.97 ONMA POOL80506636 01-Feb-2001 450.87 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 427.97 PD 22.90 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.87 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Fob-2001 450.87 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-Feb 2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -521.11 GNMA PGOL80500917 01-Feb-2001 521.11 36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -494.65 PD 26.46 13-Ma,2001 7:57:30 Ewautlw IPoekbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -521.11 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Feb-2001 521.11 36210SPA0 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,077.60 GNMA POOLOO503388 01-Feb-2001 1,077.60 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/011 01-Feb-2001 -1,022.88 PD 54.72 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,077.60 GNMA POOL 90503399 01-1`6-2001 1,077.60 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .29.42 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Feb-2001 29.42 3621000E5 6.000%02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -27.93 PD 1.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29.42 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Feb-2001 29.42 3621000E5 6.000%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .55.44 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Feb-2001 55.44 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -52.62 PD 2.82 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .55.44 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Feb-2001 55.44 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 121011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 /3-Mar-2001 7.57:30 Executive Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,110.92 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Feb-2001 1,110.92 3621OMQN4 6.000%0 111 5/2 02 9 DD 011011 01-Feb-2001 -1,054.51 PD 56AI LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,110.92 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Feb-2001 1,110.92 3621OMQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DDO1/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .24.54 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Feb-2001 24.54 36210M151 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2001 .23.29 PD 1.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24.54 GNMA POOLOO496284 01-Feb-2001 24.54 36210MJ51 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,508.93 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Feb-2001 4,509.93 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-Feb-2001 4,279.96 PD 228.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,50593 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Feb-2001 4,508.93 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DDOI/0l/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,719.78 GNMA POOLN0457814 01-Feb-2001 1.719.79 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -1,632.45 PD 87.33 13-Marv2001 7,57:30 Erecmiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED - SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIMLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,719.79 GNMA POOLOO457814 01-Feb-2001 1,719.78 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 48,053.96 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Feb-2001 49,053.96 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Feb-2001 45,613.72 PD 2.440.24 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -48,053.% GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Feb-2001 48,053.% 36209CCX2 6.000Yo 10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -79.54 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Feb-2001 79.54 36209CCQ7 6.0001/6 10/15/2028 DD 10/Ol/ 01-Feb•2001 -75.50 PD 4.04 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -79.54 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Feb-2001 79.54 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,170.47 GNMA POOL00465555 01-Feb-2001 1,170.47 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028DD09/OI/ 01-Feb-2001 .1,111.03 PD 59.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,170.47 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Feb-2001 1,170.47 36209AE48 6.0000/a09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Ma,2001 7:57.30 E maiw Wmkbeaeh- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 0I-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATF-D SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,034.84 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Feb-2001 1,034.84 36209AET3 6.000%09/152029 DO WWI 01-Feb-2001 -992.29 PD 52.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,034.84 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Feb-2001 1,034.84 36209AL 13 6.00D%09115202E DD 08/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -996.44 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Feb-2001 996.44 36209DHQO 6.000%09/152028 DD 081011 01-Feb-2001 -945.84 PD 50.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -996.44 GNMA POOL N0468339 01-Feb-2001 996.44 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82.24 GNMA POOL80468330 01-Feb-2001 82.24 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -78.06 PD 4.18 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8224 GNMA POOLN0468330 01-Feb-2001 82.24 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DD OS/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-Fab-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40.84 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Feb2001 40.84 36209WDV3 6.00D%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -38.77 PD 2.07 13-Ma,2001 7:57:30 E 9mime IPorkbeaoh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40.84 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Feb-2001 40.84 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -37,966.20 ONMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2001 37,966.20 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -38,595.02 PD -629.82 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,966.20 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 01-Feb-2001 37,96620 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,576.90 ONMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Feb-2001 51,576.90 36225OC20 7.375%06202027 DD 061011 01-Feb-2001 -52,705.04 PD -1,128.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,576.90 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Feb.2001 51,576.80 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DD 0&01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -63.56 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Feb-2001 63.56 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD 11/01/ 01-Feb-2001 -60.33 PD 3.23 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .63.56 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Feb-2001 63.56 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD 11/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Ma 2001 7:57:30 E..rNe IPorkbemh- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,611.20 FHLMC MULTICL MTO P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2001 21,611.20 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2001 -21,580.91 PD 30.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,611.20 FHLMC MULTICL MTO P/C 1574 E 01-Feb-2001 21,611.20 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,417.22 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 01-Feb-2001 39,417.22 3837H3C70 7.000%12202022 01-Feb-2001 -39,355.63 PD 61.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,417.22 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 01-Feb-2001 39,417.22 3837H3C70 7.000%12202022 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,823.00 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-Feb-2001 2,823.00 31348SWZ3 6.384%Ol/012028 DO 12/01/ 01.Feb-2001 -2,754.19 PD 69.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,963.71 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 01-Feb-2001 1,963.71 398108AE4 T430%06/012003 DO 022910 01-Feb-2001 -1.935.02 PD 28.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,%3.71 GREYSTONE SVCNO CORP FHA#95 01-feb-2001 1,963.71 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 13.Mar-1001 7.57.,30 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -607.44 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 4000-11150 01-Feb-2001 607.44 3029980E3 7.500%12/012030 DO 102119 01-Feb-2001 -594.25 PD 13.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -607.44 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 6000.11150 01-Feb-2001 607.44 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 102IN 01-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,083.61 GREEN TREE CORP 99-1)CL A-1 15-Feb-2001 23,083.61 3935052Y7 6.2901/6 1 011 5 201 3 DO 082" 15-Feb-2001 -23,093.61 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,083.61 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Feb-2001 23,083.61 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 0826/9 15-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,374.27 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2001 1.374.27 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Feb-2001 -1.374.27 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,374.27 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2001 1,374.27 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Feb.2001 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO -41,986.64 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Feb-2001 41,996.64 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Feb-2001 41,996.64 PD 0.00 13-Mar2001 7.37.30 Executive Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' 3I PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,986.64 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Feb-2001 41,986,64 3837H4NX9 VARRT02/162030 16-Feb-2001 0.00 FC 16-Feb-2001 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Feb-2001 2,264,615.78 313397BH3 MAT 02/012001 01-Feb-2001 -2,264,615.78 MT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 09-Feb-2001 494,186.11 26354AP99 02/092001 09-Feb-2001 494,186.11 MT 09-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,600,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 12-Feb-2001 5,538,891.55 38142TPC3 02/12/2001 12-Feb-2001 -5,539,991.55 MT 12-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 16-Feb-2001 2,599,595.56 91130TPG7 02/I62001 16-Feb-2001 -2,599,595.56 MT I6-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Feb-2001 2,779,053.67 313589CC5 MAT 02202001 20-Feb-2001 -2,779,053.67 MT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-200/ 7:57.30 Ersw/iw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIMLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 20-Feb2001 12,978,550.00 025BIRPLI 02/20/2001 20-Feb-2001 -12,978,S50.00 MT 206Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,700,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 20-Feb-2001 5,693,058.67 38142TPL3 02/20/20DI 20-Feb-2001 -5,693,058.67 MT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 23-Feb-2001 $85,775.50 6200SAPPB 02/23/2001 23-Feb-2001 485,775.50 MT 23-Feb-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MIN 0 SR 000 02-Feb-2001 175,000.00 12560QAK5 5,625%02/02/2001 DO 0210219 02-Feb-2001 -173,383400 MT 02-Feb-2001 1,617.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 05-Feb-2001 12,500,000.00 3134A3ZMI 6.000%07/202001 DO 07/20/9 05-Feb-2001 -12,485,625.00 CAL 14,375.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEB 05-Feb-2001 12,500,000.00 3134A3ZM1 6.000%07202001 DO 0720/9 05-Feb-2001 0.00 PC 05-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-1001 757.30 Executive Workbench' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GcsGml0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,761.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 9129273AB WITH CURRENT FACTOR 1.08647 28-Feb-2001 -4,742.39 SW .4,742.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,020.70 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANC 27-Feb-2001 0.00 79549BEGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 28-Feb-2001 •1,001.86 SW -1,001.86 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,570.00 RECORDED INFLATION ADIUSTMEN 28-Feb-2001 0.00 9128272M3 FOR 2/28/1 28-Feb-2001 -13,107.05 SW -13,107.05 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Feb-2001 0.61 996087094 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 01-Feb-2001 30,375.00 3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DO 02101/0 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 &ecutive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC GLOBAL 01-Feb-2001 16,407.62 07390213QO FLTG RT 00112002 DO 0729/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2001 8,397.51 9%085247 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2001 418.03 996085247 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM MTN SR 900570 01-FeW001 17,655.69 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/012001 DO 09/04/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 OX0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 01-Feb-2001 134,323.20 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/012005 DD 0429/0 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 01-Feb-2001 35,384.22 313397BH3 MAT 02/012001 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 01-Feb-2001 0.03 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:57:30 Executive 1Ymkbeneb' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Oc"0010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN#SR 000 02-Feb-2001 4,921.88 12560QAK5 5.625%0210212001 DO 02/02/9 02-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 02-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0,00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DEB 05-Feb-2001 31.250.00 3134A3ZMI 6.000%07/20/2001 DO 07/20N 0.00 CD 05-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 09-Feb-2001 5,813.99 26354AP99 02/092001 09-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 09-Feb-2001 0.00. LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 603.23 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000.11150 09-Feb-2001 6,065.69 302998GE3 7.500Yo 12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-lea-2001 0.00 IT 09-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 12-Feb-2001 34,681.11 066365DW4 FLTG RT 0511 120 0 3 DO 05111/ 11-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 12-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,600,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 12-Feb-2001 61,108.45 38142TPC3 02/122001 12-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 12-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS BOB 13-Feb-2001 5,500.00 3133MSBC3 5.500%08/132001 DD W13/9 13-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 13-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Man2001 7:57:30 Em ,&i Wo kbeac6 �- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Feb-2001 35,190.00 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/131 13-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 13-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,730,000,00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Feb-2001 34,649.84 79549BBGI 3.650%02/14/2002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 15-Feb-2001 24,500.00 00206HL44 7.000%08/15/2001 DO 08/20/9 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,002,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS 15-Feb-2001 30,686.25 98155KAF9 6.125%08/15/2001 DD 08/11/9 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Feb-2001 99,450.00 81240QJAI 6.630°.607/09/2002 DD 07/09/9 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 15-Feb-2001 552,187.50 31359MFHI 7.125%02/15/2005 DO 02114/0 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,0D0.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Feb-2001 62,500.00 912810EQ7 06.250%08/1S/2023 DO 081151 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 I3-Marv2001 7:57;30 Eeeenitw at6rnch' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 15-Feb-2001 415,625.00 912810EG9 09.750%09/15/2020 DO 08/15/ 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT i5-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 15-Feb-2001 1,044,770.31 3133MBY84 6.975%08/15/2003 DO 08/07/0 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 416.87 GNMA POOL 00496720 15-Feb-2001 130.89 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,623.29 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 15-Feb-2001 41,865.28 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,508.93 GNMA POOLA0491103 15-Feb-2001 1,249.89 36210FRY4 6.000Ye01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24.54 GNMA FOOL#0496294 15-Feb-2001 113.63 36210MI51 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,110.92 GNMA POOL 90496461 15-Feb-2001 4,495.40 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:37.30 Exeartive IVo,kbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO $5.44 GNMA POOL#0497343 15-Feb-2001 222.37 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29.42 GNMA POOL#0499153 15-Feb-2001 131.99 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 521.11 GNMA POOL#0500917 15-Feb-2001 123.34 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,077.60 GNMA POOL#0503388 15-Feb-2001 4,615.25 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.87 GNMA POOL#0506636 15-Feb-2001 373.54 36210YY90 6.000%0 411 5202 9 DD 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,244.65 FHLMC GROUP#78.6064 15-Feb-2001 1,480.74 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028DD 12/0V 01-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52.24 GNMA POOL#0438057 15-Feb-2001 233.75 36207PTN9 6.0000h05/152028DD05Po1/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Ma 2001 7:57.30 Executive Wkbench-' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,719.78 GNMA POOL 00457814 15-Feb-2001 434.81 36208QSB3 SAM 10/132028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT IS-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,034.94 GNMA POOL80465546 15-Feb-2001 4,520.39 36209AET3 6.0000/608/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,170.47 GNMA POOL80465555 15-Feb-2001 4,645.28 36209AS49 6.000%09/132028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 79.54 GNMA POOL#0467279 15-Feb-2001 270.78 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 101011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,053.% GNMA POOL 00467296 15-Feb-2001 4,705.65 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2029 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 82.24 GNMA POOL 80468330 15-Feb-2001 232.07 36209DHF4 6.000°.505/152028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9%.44 GNMA POOLND468339 15-Feb-2001 4,332.76 36209DHQO 6.000%09/152028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT I5-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Marv2001 7:57:30 Erecudw N'mkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63.56 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-Feb-2001 245.61 36209EXRS 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.84 GNMA POOL80483452 15-Feb-2001 170.64 36209WBV3 6.0000A 09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,374.27 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Feb-2001 18A7 31677EM4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Feb-3001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,093.61 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I IS-Feb-2001 534.31 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 082619 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,611.20 FHLMC MULTICL MID P/C 1574 E 15-Feb-2001 106.26 3133T02D5 5.900%06115,7017 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A I5-Feb-2001 15,346.19 3133TUE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-lan-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 4TR 00562 15-Feb-2001 67,193.12 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/142003 DD 021141 15-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mar-2001 7:57:30 Eaecu//ve Bbrkbeach•' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4l PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 16-Feb-2001 404.44 9113MPG7 02/162001 16-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 16-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,986.64 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Feb-2001 12,416.00 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 16-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 820,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 20-Feb-2001 22,879.00 3133MSDS6 5.390%08/17/2001 DD 08/1W9 17-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20.Feb-2001 69,227.70 370425QV5 FLTG FIT 08/182003 DD 09/17/ 20-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 20-Feb-2001 21,450.00 025BIRPLI 02202001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20.Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,700,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 20-Feb-2001 6.941.33 38142TPL3 02202001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 20-Feb-2001 20,946.33 313589CC5 MAT 02202001 20-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mo 2001 7.57:30 Exeneive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2001 -28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,092.58 GNMA 11 POOL 40080395 20-Feb-2001 6,532.12 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 215,748.77 GNMA H POOL 8080408X 20-Feb-2001 52,653.39 36225CN29 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Feb-2001 0.00 1T 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,966.20 GNMA It POOL 40080023 20-Feb-2001 7,250.16 36225CAZ9 7.625%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,576.80 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 20-Feb-2001 9,582.96 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 21-Feb-2001 3220.00 3134A05P3 6.440%09212001 DO 0921/9 21-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTRO06 21-Feb-2001 U23.84 17120QE80 FLTG RT 08/092002 DO 04/081 21-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 21-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 39,417.22 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 21-Feb-2001 11,447.91 3837H3C70 7.000%12/202022 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 21-Feb-2001 0.00 13-Mm.2001 7:37:30 Erecu/Ae WWkbweA^ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2001 - 28-FEB-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 23-Feb-2001 14,224.50 62008APP8 02/23/2001 23-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 23-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI1 A6 26-Feb-2001 10,833.30 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 26-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 27-Feb-2001 35,011.11 345397SC8 FLTG RT OS/27/2006 DD 08/27/ 27-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 27-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,963.71 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 27-Feb-2001 8,053.24 398108AE4 7.430°A,06/01/2003 DD 02/29/0 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 27-Feb-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INTADJ 28-Feb-2001 21.25 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 28-Feb-2001 0.00 CD 28-1`6-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 607.44 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE 8000-11150 28-Feb-2001 6,061.92 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DD 10/21/9 01-Feb-2001 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2001 0.00 13.Mar2001 7:57:30 &ecmiw W.,Oeirch FAHR COMMITTEE Neetl/1 /Ol"4101 Tesd.er3/26/OlD" ^y„r. 3 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR01-12 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SUBSTITUTION OF STANDBY CERTIFICATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF LLOYDS TSB BANK FOR OCSD 1992 REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-08, approving substitution of the Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Lloyds TSB Bank PLC for the existing Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement of Barclays Bank PLC. SUMMARY In 1992, the District issued $160,600,000 of refunding Certificates of Participation (COPS)to take advantage reduced interest costs. These COPS were issued in a variable interest rate mode. To minimize the District's exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to satisfy rating agency concerns, an interest rate exchange agreement, commonly called an interest rate swap, was approved with AIG for the term of the COPS. One of the provisions of the swap is that AIG obtain a Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement. This is a letter of credit provided by a highly rated bank. A standby agreement provides for payment of principal and/or interest by the bank in the event the District is unable to make the payment. The current provider, Barclays Bank, has decided to leave this portion of the banking business. In response, AIG has solicited proposals from other banks and has selected Lloyds TSB Bank PLC to provide this service for the next five years. Fees for this liquidity facility are paid by AIG. Both Standard & Poor's and Moody's have confirmed their existing AAA and Aaa ratings in the event this substitution is confirmed. There should be no impact on the marketability or desirability of the District's COPs from this transaction and thus no impact on interest rates is expected. In any case, interest rate risk has been transferred to AIG via the swap provisions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No cost to the District. GAoy.dw%...d.reoard AWm Rze IQOOI BaaN A,edn R...MOW0Bemu(dlaoc R.,. d. L OW Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT \ ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Instruct AIG to select another liquidity provider. There are no advantages to the District from pursuing alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None. GGS G\w dt"gendakBoara Agenda Re MS2001 Boats Agenda Rewdmowmleaft 14(d)add Reseed WgtgA Paget RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 01-08 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY BY THE DISTRICT OF AN ALTERNATE STANDBY CERTIFICATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT RELATING TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1992 SERIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATES AND RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California (collectively, the "Predecessor Districts") have previously caused to be executed and delivered $160,600,000 aggregate principal amount of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, of which $124,170,000 aggregate principal amount is currently outstanding (the "Certificates"), pursuant to the Trust Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1992 (the "Original Trust Agreement'), among the Predecessor Districts and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A. (the "Trustee"); WHEREAS, the Original Trust Agreement was modified and amended pursuant to a First Supplemental Trust Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2000, by and between the Trustee and the Orange County Sanitation District (the "District"), as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts (as so modified and amended, the "First Supplemented Trust Agreement'), and the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts, further modified, amended, reformed and restated the First Supplemented Trust Agreement by entering into the Reformed Trust Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2000 (such Reformed Trust Agreement being herein referred to as the "Trust Agreement'), by and among the Trustee, the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation (the "Corporation") and the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the Certificates were re- designated the "Orange County Sanitation District Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series"; DOLSIA W AR4J WHEREAS, in order to secure the timely payment of the principal and interest evidenced by the Certificates and to provide a source of payment for the purchase of Certificates tendered by the owners thereof, the District entered into the Reformed Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2000, with Barclays Bank PLC, New York Branch (the "Prior Provider") and the Trustee, pursuant to which the Prior Provider provides liquidity for the Certificates; WHEREAS, the Trust Agreement allows the District to provide an Alternate Standby Agreement (as defined in the Trust Agreement) prior to the expiration of the standby agreement then in effect; WHEREAS, the District desires to, and Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, acting through its Miami Agency, is willing to, enter into such a Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with the Trustee (the "Standby Agreement'); NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors (the "Board")of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. All of the recitals herein contained are true and correct and the Board so finds. Section 2. The Standby Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Chair of the Board of Directors, and such other member of the Board of Directors as the Chair may designate, the General Manager of the District and the Director of Finance of the District, and such other officer of the District as the Director of Finance may designate (the "Authorized Officers") are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver the Standby Agreement in the form submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Standby Agreement by such Authorized Officer. Section 3. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all documents and instruments and to do and cause to be done any and all acts and things necessary or proper for carrying out the execution and delivery of the Standby Agreement and the transaction contemplated by this Resolution. Section 4. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and employees of the District with respect to the execution, delivery and sale of the Standby Agreement, or in connection with or related to the transaction contemplated herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. -2- Doar.nran3aa3 1 Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 28, 2001. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary -3- no¢uIan3±a.3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS meeting Date I ToeO.uf Dir. 03/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Iem Number Item Number s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Specialist SUBJECT: EMERGENCY REPAIR TO 24-INCH FORCE MAIN INTO PLANT NO. 2, PURCHASE ORDER NO. 26925 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, Section 3.07, to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 26925 issued to Mladen Buntich Construction Company for Emergency Repair to 24-inch Coast Highway Force Main at the Inlet Structure east of the Santa Ana River, for an additional amount of$110,000, for a total amount not to exceed $200,000. SUMMARY This item is to notify the Board of Directors regarding the use of the General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, in accordance with Resolution No. OCSD 99-23 for Purchase Orders in excess of$100,000 each. The District was notified by a citizen on the levee bike trail of foul odors in the vicinity of the Plant No. 2 Siphon Inlet Structure. As a result of this notification the sinkhole was found over the 24-inch Force Main entering the Inlet Structure. No spill occurred, as it appeared that sewage flowing through the pipe remained in the pipe flow line. The original purchase order for$90,000 was issued to investigate the cause of the sinkhole and make necessary repairs. The ductile iron pipe force main adjacent to the Inlet Structure had collapsed due to severe corrosion at the crown of the pipe. Additional deterioration of the pipe beyond the collapsed force main section was also observed to be in immediate need of repair. Change Order No. 1 to the original purchase order is to slip line approximately 400 feet of deteriorated force main. The additional work included removing a section of pipe for access, cleaning, video inspection, slip line work, and construction of a new pressure manhole at the access point. Change Order No. 1 is not to exceed $110,000. The purchase order and subsequent change order were issued under a sole source agreement due to the emergency nature of the pipe collapse and to prevent the possibility of a sewage spill. The General Manager has approved ae. :MM Page 1 the emergency measures taken to eliminate a potential hazard. A summary of the Purchase Order follows: Purchase Order Description of Purchase Order Amount PO Number 26925 investigate and repair initial NTE $ 90,000 to Mladen Bundich collapse of the 24" force main. Construction Company Change Order No. 1 Renovate approximately 400 feet of NTE $ 110,000 deteriorated force main. TOTAL NTE $ 200,000 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None SKID GWglobaMgenda Draft ReportWolnt Boards%AR-Emergency Repair to 241nch Fame Main at PL2.dm R.e.. saris Page 2 r' MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT February 22, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on February 29, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Steve Anderson, Altemate No. 1 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kellene Burn-Roy, Dick Corneille, Bruce Peer Swan Wes Bannister Chalmers - Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Others: Denis Bilodeau Steve Tedesco—ASL Consulting Group Blake Anderson Brett Franklin Michelle Tuchman —NCG Porter Novelli Lisa Lawson Others: Bob Finn — Brown and Caldwell David Ludwin Debra Burris Richard Bell, Greg Heiertz- IRWD Wendy Sevenandt Tom Dawes Thom Coughran —Santa Ana Gary Streed Shivaji Deshmukh Don Calkins, George Martin -Anaheim Lisa Tomko Jill Everhart RonLinsky- NWRI Cindy Gehman Dave Houston, Patricia Jakabiak Counsel Jenny Glasser — Salomon Smith Barney Brad Hogin John Kennedy Patrick Scanlon —Southern CA Water Co. Mike Markus Bill Tappan— Parsons Corporation Mehul Patel Bill Everest— Boyle Engineering Jennifer Phillips Bill Ault, Bob Kellison — Fountain Valley Ron Wildermuth Kelly Rowe Brad Hogin —Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart Mark Butler- Butier Construction Management Jamal Awed—CH2M HILL 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Anthony, and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held January 29, 2001 were approved as mailed. r GWR System Minutes q February 22, 2001 Page 2 of 4 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Financial Study Mr. Dawes distributed and reported on a letter dated February 20, 2001 from Mr. Patrick Scanlon, Chairman of the Orange County Groundwater Producers, which addressed the producers' review of the Public Resources Advisory Group Financial Study on the Groundwater Replenishment System. Mr. Dawes noted the letter included general comments and their request for additional financing modeling. Mr. Scanlon addressed the Committee and said that while the producers support the project, they have concerns on the estimation of cost of the GWR System water. Responses to the producers' comments will be discussed at the next Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) meeting on Thursday, March 1 at 3:00 p.m. 3. Interim Governance Recommendation Mr. Dawes recommended that an Interim govemance authority be granted to the JCC and OCWD Board of Directors in order to manage construction contracts, approve well site purchase agreements, award or increase professional service contracts, and hire or award contracts for temporary staff. An Operations Agreement between OCWD and OCSD will not be completed for approximately six months after the March 28 decision to proceed with the project, and the interim agreement will serve as the goveming document until replaced by the Operations Agreement. The Committee discussed interim governance authority needed to manage the GWR System until the final Operations Agreement between the agencies is approved. The Committee approved, in general, the following governance concepts. Final Committee action on these recommendations is scheduled for March 19. A. Construction Authority Recommend that the JCC have authority to recommend to the OCWD Board award of pre-purchase and construction contracts, necessary findings and change order approvals, In an amount not to exceed $5 million provided that: 1. Both the OCWD and OCSD approved budget include the funds; and 2. Both Boards have received reports on projected activities; and 3. Two Committee members from each agency approve the award. B. Richts-of Way Authority Recommended that the JCC have authority to recommend to the OCWD Board of Directors purchase of easements and fee rights-of-way for the project and take all necessary actions to accomplish the same. Delegate to the OCWD Board of Directors authority to make the purchases on behalf of the GWR System as long as: 1. Both the OCWD and OCSD approved budget include the funds; and a y GWR System Minutes February 22,2001 Page 3 of 4 2. Both Boards have received reports on projected activities; and 3. Two Committee members from each agency approve the purchase. C. Professional Services/Staffing Authority Recommend that the JCC have authority to recommend to the OCWD Board of Directors the award of professional services contracts up to $1,000,000. Delegate to the OCWD Board of Directors authority to award all professional service contracts over $100,000 and up to $1 million, and approve all change orders. Designate the JCC as the final authority for OCWD to make personnel decisions on behalf of the GWR System provided the two agency general managers concur, as long as: 1. Both the OCWD and OCSD approved budget include the funds; and 2. Both Boards have received reports on projected activities; and 3. Two Committee members from each agency approve the award. D. Agreement Authority Recommend that the JCC have authority to recommend to the OCWD Board of Directors approval of agreements with (1) the Orange County Flood Control District re: use of the Santa Ana River right-of-way for the GWR Pipeline; (2) with the County of Orange re: use of SAR right-of-way adjacent to the Lacy Jail; (3) River View Golf Course re: use of leased land for the GWR Pipeline and relocation of Bike Trail; and (4) purchase well sites. Grant the JCC the authority to approve agreements and purchases up to $100,000 each. Delegate to the OCWD Board of Directors authority to approve agreements or expenditures exceeding $100,000 as long as: 1. Both the OCWD and OCSD approved budget include the funds; and 2. Both Boards have received reports on projected activities; and 3. Two Committee members from each agency approve the award. For all authorizations, all three conditions stated above must be met in the order listed. 4. Proiect Final Design. Construction, and Start-Up of Services Mr. Dawes gave a presentation and reported on the overview of the project final design, construction management, and start-up services, including organizational charts; qualifications, roles, and work effort; scope of work and fees; schedule; computer system integration; and construction management services. He reported that several special services have been added to the project, which includes 17 studies and evaluations of fire protection, safety, power, Green Acres Project upgrades, warehouse space requirements, construction laydown areas, and other related items. After discussion, the Committee requested the following: 1. Add Mr. Ron Linsky, National Water Research Institute, to the Independent/Technical Review Committee. GWR System Minutes d February 22, 2001 Page 4 of 4 2. General Managers to determine if the line items of Transactional System Integration and Business Plan, Sections 21 and 22, of Camp Dresser & McKee Team's Scope of Work is OCW D "core" business or GWR System items. Mr. Blake Anderson's committee will recommend final cost sharing on these items. 3. General Managers to form a committee to do an independent check and validate consultant fees for the Camp Dresser& McKee Team. Director Pickler requested that Directors Anthony and Anderson serve on the committee. 4. Amounts paid to date for consultants. 5. Research on contract employees and the new legal issues regarding those employees. 6. Develop criteria to be used in the event a consultant is dropped from the CDM Team to determine if the new consultant should be approved by the JCC. 5. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: • An application for a $50 million grant was submitted to the Department of Water Resources on February 20, 2001. • Directors Eckenrode, Pickler, and King presented a "Water Visionary Award" to Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez on Friday, February 16. Ms. Michelle Tuchman, NCG Porter Novelli, distributed a draft newsletter that will be mailed next week. Mr. Blake Anderson reported that OCSD's Financial and Human Resources Committee would meet on March 14 at 5:00 p.m. Mr. W ildermuth reported that first of a series of articles by Mr. Chris Reed of the Orange County Register would be released soon. He reported that Mr. Pat Brennan also of the Orange County Register would have an article on desalting released soon. There were no comments from counsel, directors, general managers or the public. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 1 at 3:00 p.m, at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT March 1, 2001, 3:00 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 3:00 p.m. on March 1, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickier, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue Jerry King, Alternate No. 1 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kellene Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille, Peer Swan Denis Bilodeau Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Bob Finn —Brown and Caldwell Others: Others: Michelle Tuchman— NCG Porter Novelli Blake Anderson Debra Bums Bob Finn —Brown and Caldwell Lisa Lawson Steve Conklin Richard Bell, Greg Heiertz, Paul Jones - IRWD David Ludwin Tom Dawes Terry Lane—Garden Grove Wendy Sevenandt Shivaji Deshmukh George Martin -Anaheim Gary Streed Jill Everhart Dave Houston, Patricia Jakabiak Cindy Gehman — Salomon Smith Barney Counsel Jenny Glasser Patrick Scanlon— Southern CA Water Co. Brad Hogin Clark Ids Bill Tappan— Parsons Corporation John Kennedy Michelle Boyd, Bob Kellison —Fountain Valley Mike Markus Kelly Rowe Mehul Patel Brad Hogin—Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart Jennifer Phillips Ed LaBahn Ron Wildermuth 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Donahue, seconded by Director Patterson, and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held February 22, 2001 were approved as mailed. GWR System Minutes W March 1, 2001 Page 2 of 3 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Discussion Of Groundwater Producers' Comments On The Financial Study Dated February 20, 2001 Mr. Dawes reported on staff responses to the independent Orange County Groundwater Producers' (producers) comments (letter dated February 20, 2001)from the producers' review of the Public Resources Advisory Group's (PRAG) Financial Study. The producers' submitted questions generally on the PRAG Financial Study cost assumptions and cost of MWD replenishment water. The comments included the following: 1. Base-Case No. 1 Assumptions 2. Base-Case No 2 Assumptions 3. Benefits of Salinity Reduction and Drought 4. Santa Ana River Supplies 5. MWD Rates 6. Energy Costs 7. Labor Costs 8. Unit Water Costs The producers also requested additional financing modeling on the following subjects: 1. Modified Base-Case 2. MWD Rates 3. Energy Cost 4. Financing Cost 5. Capital Cost Contingency 6. Overhead Costs 7. Unit Costs Mr. Dawes reported that prior to this meeting, staff prepared a 20-page agenda item report that gave staff responses to the producers' comments and modeling requests. Each item was individually discussed. Mr. Kennedy reported that a grant application for$5 million will be submitted to the Santa Ana Water Quality Control Board. Director Anthony requested that a meeting with Director Swan, Mr. Mills and himself be held before the March 19 JCC meeting to further discuss the producers' comments. Mr. Scanlon reported a working group of producers submitted the comments and that the producers would respond to GWR System's responses in the next few days. 3. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: 0 Distributed an IRWD Board workshop agenda dated Monday, February 26. / y GWR System Minutes i March 1,2001 Page 3 of 3 • EPA will be sending a one-dollar wire transfer to the GWR System account on Monday, March 5 as a test. When that deposit has been confirmed a wire transfer of the balance, $499,999 will be made. • Joint Workshop #5 will be held on Saturday, March 3, 2001 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at OCWD • The JCC meeting scheduled for March 19 will finalize recommendations that will be sent to the Joint Board Meeting scheduled for March 28. • The GWR System segment of the WACO meeting scheduled for Friday, March 2, 2001 has been canceled. Mr. Blake Anderson reported that OCSD's Financial and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee would meet on March 14 at 5:00 p.m. and discuss the GWR System. Mr. Mills reported on the following: • He and Director King attended an annual meeting in Washington D.C. and that the GWR System received strong support from congresspersons. • Congresswoman Sanchez has submitted a rider bill that will increase the $20 million appropriation in grant funds to $80 million. • Congressman Ken Calvert, Corona, Chairs the Water and Energy Subcommittee. There were no comments from counsel, directors or the public. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, March 19 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley.