The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-02-28 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT February 22, 2001 " 1 g141962-2412411 NOTICE OF MEETING e0Po E�B122i BOARD OF DIRECTORS Pountaln Valley.CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-812] Men 't address; 10344 ella Avenue WEDNESDAY, February 28, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. PounL2 .CA 9 2]0B-7O8-]018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue , Fountain Valley, California 92708 Manger . • cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Anaheim District will be held at the above location, time and date. area auene Park res. in Fountaalley Pollef[ea 13ara.n Grove Huny,ngWnmn Beach Boa Secretary o-hn. La Habra L.Palma Las Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Plecenua Sanw A Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Seal Beach S[anten ruc[in Vrlle Park PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, March 1,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Y Unya C...W er 0..... JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT JOINT BOARD WORKSHOP - Saturday, March 3, 2001 at 8:00 a.m.@OCWD seeks" Districts Costa Mae. OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 7,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Midway City Water Districts FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 14,2001 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, March 19, 2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. 'Maintaining WeCdGc,s Leayerah/p m Wasrewa[ar any Were'Resource ManagemenC a Op BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 June June 27, 2001 July 'July 18, 2001 August August22, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November November 28, 2001 December *December 19, 2001 January January 23, 2002 February February 27, 2002 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month \4adon\dat llwp.dW\admin\BSWgenda\2007 Meebng NOUmNN2.2.doc a ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 02/28/01 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON..................._LI — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................i — (LARSON) ....................... BOYD............................ — (CRANDALL) ................... CARRO720................. ✓ ✓ _ (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE..................... J✓ ✓ — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. �/�C — — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN...................—,L ✓ — — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN.......................... L�L — — (DUVALL)......................... GULLIXSON...................JZ --z— — (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... — (WARD)............................ KROM........................ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................�L — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... / — (CHRISTY) ....................... MC GUIGAN.................. — (SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ — (COONTZ)........................ MURPHY...................... — (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. — — — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. �Ltr63a[P117 (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ —4,., — (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY................... . 1L — (DOW).............................. SIGLER......................... �C �G — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ J� — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson ✓ `��gxuvaq Ghirelli Kyle LawsonLudwin ✓ �� /( Miles Ooten ✓ DQu �_ Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus 7-A��mq�✓ A Nixon 02l28/01 G:\wp.dta%dminlBS\DIRECTOR\Dimtom Roll Call.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. _ DATE: 11^ Zrc ' 0 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (ciVziipp copd TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: ,�� O AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street/) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: 'tO 2z (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS L ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAYBE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 12 ZQJ AGENDA ITEM NO. • 1 M 1 1 1 Y 1 f 1 f f f f 1 1 f f 1 1 1 1 f f 1 f 1 f 1 NAME: (please print) %43as. HOME ADDRESS: R'i 0 ,2 v. 02 4 I (number/street) l 0 S 1 \ l a lA k l 0 % c- a U'7 2,0 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: S� rxt . �,y_(' rONu, az� i o d U II . / 5� AbQ}of (self/name of organization) H:Nm.d1a\admIMBST0RMSRequeet to Speek.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7r79-61 AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . .��.,,11.�� . . . A-.A �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) � �- n /" 60e 7 C I (city/zip code)c /,,, TELEPHONE: ` Y z 5 �� `�p�_> REPRESENTING: OLee� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. MOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) f e e 's, U. r HOME ADDRESS: — 'q (number/street) (city/zip code) r / TELEPHONE: 6 �,6 `f V J S— REPRESENTING: lb&—� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) V,I �2 C 7 fJ I HOME ADDRESS: ,41F S oD �Oi1.15 M1 CJ41-j 'P� N (number/street) I C� ca (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �'fl`�1 REPRESENTING: �LZr (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Ix l D / BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) E `/t C#xL,I o r S: A - q'OW J(q MA SkA 101 6C Ci IUs tLa— a sc— i + . o Z LI Er4 I ol%&Or LoNJOA �e 6r<p&j �lwo +� L 5�C 1 1 NSl c Ireki, 'ri fix-( 7o0. . �Oun Vrr-N Vim:. Q�310 r i Iw t " rs YL 70,0,TrrT pLRllj A77M� � C�J� JIZI� � �Iryl�h H9WP.DTWADMINkWVF0RMS0GN-IN FORM.D00 IwWOFFKESOF /�_ WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN& SMART ✓0 A FxosessiduConewiwrl MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Member of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FOR YOUR INFORMAiIOPI FROM: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel DATE: February 28, 2001 RE: Government Code section 84308 This memo is submitted for the information and benefit of all Directors particularly the new members, but also to serve as a refresher for others. The purpose of this memorandum is to explain the requirements of Government Code section 84308 and the implementing regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission found in California Code of Regulations section 18438 et seq. as applied to Directors. That section relates to campaign contributions received by Directors in their capacities as city, county or special district elected officials when participating in your capacity as an OCSD Director, in decisions regarding OCSD contracts. Section 84308 Government Code section 84308 disqualifies any "officer" of a public agency, who is running or has run for elective office, from participating in decisions affecting his or her campaign contributors. The law disqualifies the officer from participating in certain proceedings if the official has received campaign contributions of more than $250 from a party, participant or their agents within the 12 months preceding the decision. It also requires disclosure on the record of the proceeding of all campaign contributions received from these persons during that period. In addition, section 84308 prohibits solicitation or receipt of campaign contributions in excess of $250 during such proceedings, or for 90 days after the decision, from parties, participants or their agents. Who is Covered? Section 84308 covers all elected and appointed "officers" of an "agency" and their alternates, as well as candidates for elective public office. The term "officer" is very broadly defined under section 84308. It includes the governing board or commission of any public agency, as well as the head of an agency. (Reg. 18438.1.) Chair and Member of Board of Directors, OCSD Re: Government Code section 84308 February 28, 2001 Page 2 The scope of the statute is narrowed considerably, however, by the definition of the term "agency." Due to exemptions from the definition of agency (discussed below), the law applies most often to appointed members of local boards and commissions, such as planning commissions and in your case, to the Sanitation District board. Section 84308 primarily regulates agencies, not individuals. As a result, a person who is a member of an exempted agency (such as an elected city council), is covered by the law when he or she acts as a voting member of another agency, i.e., OCSD. Prohibited Conduct Section 84308 prohibits officers from soliciting, accepting or directing campaign contributions of more than $250 from any party, participant or agent of a party or participant, while a proceeding is pending before the officer's agency and for three months following the date of that decision. Similarly, a party, a participant, or an agent cannot make a campaign contribution of more than $250 to an officer during the course of the proceedings and for three months following the decision. An officer"solicits" a contribution only if he or she knows of has reason to know that the person being solicited is a party or participant (or an agent of either) and personally requests the contribution or knowingly allow his or her agent to do so. A prohibited solicitation under section 84308 does not include a request made in a mass mailing to the public, at a public gathering or in a published newspaper or other vehicle of mass media. Disqualification An officer will be disqualified from participating in a decision when, prior to making the decision, he or she learns that a party or participant in a proceeding (either individually or with or through an agent) has made a contribution of more than $250 to the officer within the preceding 12 months. However, if the officer returns the contribution (or that portion of the contribution which is over$250)within 30 days from the time he or she learns of the contribution and the proceeding, then disqualification is not required. Chair and Member of Board of Directors, OCSD Re: Government Code section 84308 February 28, 2001 Page 3 Disclosina Contributions Prior to rendering any decision, each officer who received a campaign contribution of more than $250 within the preceding 12 months from a party, participant or agent of a party or participant must disclose the fact on the record of the proceeding. If there is a public hearing, the officer should make the disclosure on the public record at the beginning of the hearing. However, if no public hearing is held, the disclosure should be included in the written record of the proceeding. Likewise, a party or participant to a proceeding must disclose on the record of the proceeding any campaign contribution of more than $250 made within the preceding 12 months by the party or participant, or his or her agent, to any officer of the agency. Proceeding A proceeding involves action to grant, deny, revoke, restrict or modify 'licenses, permits, or other entitlements for use." (Reg. 18438.2.) Section 84308 defines the phrase "licenses, permits, or other entitlements for use" to mean proceedings on all business, profession, trade and land use licenses and permits, and other entitlements for use, including all entitlements for land use, all contracts (other than competitively bid, labor or personal employment contracts) and all franchises. As a practical matter there are not many instances where these provisions apply to your actions as an OCSD Director. About the only license or permit issue is the very rare occurrence of revocation of an industrial waste discharge permit (two or three in the past 10 years). As for contracts, virtually all of our construction contracts are competitively bid and are thus exempt. The major items of concern would be consulting contracts such as engineers, geo technical and environmental professionals. Chair and Member of Board of Directors, OCSD Re: Government Code section 84308 February 28, 2001 Page 4 SUMMARY Directors who have received campaign contributions aggregating more than $250 during the 12 months preceding an action by the OCSD Board, must not participate in any proceeding involving the contributing party and should disclose the facts on the record of the proceeding. k4w HOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL-OCSD TLW:Iam cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Ms. P. Kyle ,I --- w va air:avn sawn Ana moos:♦ arsbews�wu0 ' P of 76 Fax Note 72 ;,y:'.. RM woos. �, JrJ4 ro, A-A# : :��..c^wP�,�vI�u.-pfw�t/on aWmq•r.-. �?+uE. .r3`x • !'m`a7rµ- ,9G.2- o3.lL, ("4°°"r an Cd_9oi-'f5d•� '°a'a.'SC R-9o3-Y:777� r_j,.,a C.lww, Carl W.and Marsha If.Schreiber 28620 Brush Canyon Drive Yorba Linda,CA 92887 (714)694-06.'l4 rxl.rchreibereblale.net SENT BY FAX ONLY February 25,2001 David A.Ludwht, Director of Engineering Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Re Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) David,Lisa and the OCSD Board of Directors: The management of public utilities hi complex, to my the least. We only need look at the current situation with the electrica: and natural gas rates to see that there are as many solutions as them are voices at the rostrum. All the more reason that a project being planned since 1994 should have sought the Input of those who might have been Impacted long before December 2000. Masse undentand,I do not doubt the need to relocate the SARI pipeline. No amount of second-guessing will remedy the lack of foresight can the part of The 1975 Planning team. That's water under the bridge. However,you,the OCSD Board, do have an opportunity to demonstrate your community consciousness by recognizing your failure to adequately and appropriately seek the input of ALL potentially affected property owners throughout this planning process. I urge you to reconsider your decision to relocate the SARI pipeline in my backyard and the backyards of Mother property owners. As a former elected official and one who manages multi-million dollar projects, it is easy to recognize why you chose this mute-it is the most politically expedient. It is far easier to contend with 69 private properly owners than to work with CalTmns, the Sierra Club or the railroad. But,please do not forget that you represent the people-the people of the OCSD and the 69 property owners you have until recently ignored. David made an interesting ccrmmeit last Wednesday night. He said that he and the staff were there"to work with the property owners." But,as was asked that evening,what Is there to work out? The dechdun has been made. The only thing left is negotiation and signatures. Nowhere in your lethrcs am property owners asked their opinion. Nowhere were we asked to join a property owners advisory group that would Inform the decision you have made.. Only now are Fab-26-01 10: 11A BIOLA UNIVERSITY 15629034750 P.02 .. a. Page 2..,....... ... ... .l ..,. we being asked to represent the 3500 homeowners who will be inconvenienced by construction traffic. We 69 property owners look across our backyards every day of the week at the: Santa Ana River. Wouldn't our input have been of any value to the Board? I would also be remiss if I did not mention the ease with which Lisa spoke of condemnation. When asked what would happen if property owners did not give easements, she did not say the route would be reconsidered, or the Board would chose a less invasive route. She simply said easements would be gained through the courts. That certainly sounds like the property owners are the very last group on the list to be considered. In fact,property owners received no consideration. It is my preference that the SARf pipeline not be placed on my property. If another route is available and right-of-way can be obtained, I ask that that be done. While cost is a factor, and the project cost will eventually find its way back to all property owners, the property values of we 69 affected property owners is most important. If each of you had bought a home on Brush Canyon Drive 17 months ago, and you were just hearing that a pipeline being planned since 1994 was going to go through your property, how would you be reacting? Please consider my situation and the situation of my 68 neighbor as your review your decision. Thank You, Carl W. Schreiber r' Thomas J. Stamads 25628 Corsica Way Yorba Linda, CA 92887 (714) 692-0949 E-mail: lion28r@earthlinknet Feb. 27, 2001 ATTN: Lisa Lawson Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 RE: Objection to Proposed SARI sewage line location Ms. Lawson, 1 cannot attend the meeting scheduled for Feb.28,2001 at 7PM at the Orange County Sanitation District offices to voice my objection to the proposed SARI sewage line planned on the easements on properties bordering the Santa Ana River in Yorba Linda. By this letter I register my objection, for the record as comments,to the construction of this sanitation line on the easement crossing my property at 25628 Corsica Way,Yorba Linda, CA 92887. 1 join my neighborhood homeowners in this objection,as it will adversely effect our properties,their values and can pose a potential sanitation hazard with such a major county sewage line planned to be crossing on the properties of homes in this tract. I urge the Sanitation District to reconsider this plan and relocate this SARI line to alternate locations along the river not in proximity to residences. Sincerely, Thomas J. Stamatis Homeowner STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on . 2001, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices oni, 201 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this �7.4aday of -4 �. Penny M. K) , Secrete Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 11RADON\DATA1\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC +, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT February 21, 2001 penny$Vie, (ry oples no label) teen,; Board g141962�2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors nttlleq nEtlnm Bo. Ball e127vall Subject: Board Letter ro„nt9272B- 127 1 9272E-B127 .tr.wt addnwt 10,44 eh.Avenue 1.ntaln Vail".cA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92708-7018 information on any of the items, please call me. District Achieves 100 Percent Compliance with Ocean Discharge Permit During Mantle. 2090 Agana. • Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance reports that the District was in title, complete compliance with our Ocean Discharge Permit for the calendar year 2000. For 100% complete compliance the District will be recognized by the Association of Anaheim Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies [AMSA] with a Gold award at its spring meeting. Bret Buene Perk The compliance achievement is because the District has the proper facilities in place 0,o... that are reliably maintained and correctly operated throughout the entire year. The Pounrein V.II.y Sanitation District has achieved gold or silver award status for each of the last 15 Fullerton Be,yen Grove years. In addition the District was in complete compliance with the air, solids and Hodoingron Beech energy permits the entire year. Ir.ne Le Hehra Le Palma Los Alemlta. District Moves on Leadership Education and Development(LEAD) Newport saeoh Orange Placentae The District's Leadership Education and Development(LEAD)team was formed in Banta An. 1999 to develop a plan for promoting leadership throughout the District to support our Small Baaoh vision, mission and guiding principles. The program goals include building a shared Blanton Tuiam vision, integrating the guiding principles throughout the organization, increasing the Ville Pork level of trust between management and employees, implementing values-based %noo Linda change strategies, and developing leaders as coaches. C.0 my of Cr.ng. During this calendar year, our LEAD program was implemented focusing first on 70 9..ltar/ gl.trlats management staff including supervisors, managers and executive management. Chapman University was selected to develop and facilitate the program. In the future, co.ta Moon leadership development will extend to all employees with a focus on developing Midway city leadership attributes in everyone. w.t.r oi.trmt. There is a news article attached that describes the District's partnership with lrvna Ranch Chapman University. 'Meinreming WorldZla..LeaCershp in wastewater and wirer Resource Management Members of the Board Page 2 February 21, 2001 New Public Interest Grouo Tracking District's Ocean Outfall Issues As the Board is aware, at both the December and January meetings, representatives from the newly-formed Ocean Outfall Interest Group spoke during public comment portions of the meeting. The group is comprised of individuals who are opposed to a 2003 renewal of the District's Clean Water Act Section 310(h)variance from full secondary treatment. On January 24, the District hosted approximately a dozen members of the Ocean Outfall Interest Group to discuss their concerns. Blake Anderson, Bob Ghirelli, Bob Ooten, and Jim Herberg each answered various questions regarding the outfall, full secondary options and the strategic plan. After preliminary discussion of the complex issues, the group agreed to participate in twice-monthly educational meetings to learn about the District's operations. The meetings will continue until completion in late May or early June. The following is a tentative schedule for the group: 24Jan (Completed) 28-Mar(Tent.) Introduction Plant 2/0dor Control Blake Anderson, Bob Ghirelli, Doug Cook Bob Ooten, Jim Herberg 7-Feb (Completed) TBA Plant Tour Huntington Beach Testing Current Waiver George Robertson, Charlie McGee Bob Ghirelli, Jim Colston 11-Apr(Tent.) 21-Feb (Completed) Ocean Monitoring Program/Lab Full Secondary Options George Robertson Jim Herberg 9-May(Confirmed) 1-Mar (Tent.) GWRS (Water Factory 21 Tour) SARI/Source Control Tom Dawes, Jim Herberg Bob Ghirelli, Mahin Talebi 23-May (Confirmed) 14-Mar(Confirmed) Biosolids Budget Bob Ghirelli, Mike Moore Gary Steed California State Water Project Drastically Reduces Anticipated 2001 Water Deliveries On January 31, the California Department of Water Resources issued a tentative estimate that the State Water Project will deliver about 824,000 acre-feet during calendar 2001. This equates to an only 20 percent allocation to most of the agencies receiving SW P water. This 80 percent reduction is based on the current reservoir Y Members of the Board Page 3 February 21, 2001 storage and hydrologic conditions affecting watersheds serving the State Water Project. The SW P provides a supplemental water supply to 29 public agencies in California, meeting a least part of the water needs of about 20 million Californians and helping to irrigate about 600,000 cares of farmland. The Department of Water Resources, which planned, built and operates the State Water Project, annually issues a series of allocation estimates, starting with conservative estimates early in winter. Estimates are subject to change during the winter and spring, as more rainfall and snowpack data becomes available. Moderate rainfall and Sierra snowpack are cited among factors considered for the delivery estimate. SW P delivery approvals are based on the amount of water in SW P storage reservoirs, a conservative projection of runoff for the remainder of 2001, contractor requests and SW P operation constraints. During the last six years,watersheds feeding the SW P have experienced heavy precipitation,which resulted in high volumes of water delivery through the SW P. Deliveries in wet years typically range around 3 million acre-feet. The current delivery projection approximates 20 percent of the amount requested by SW P Contractors. Reflecting fairly dry weather conditions in January, this represents a downward adjustment from the final allocation project of 40 percent issued earlier this winter. Serious Water Shortage Facing California, Reseachers Warn By Bernice Ng, Daily Californian, U. California-Berkeley (The following is an excerpt—see attached article for the entire text) (U-WIRE) BERKELEY, Calif.—Energy may not be the only utility Califomians should be worried about, warn University of California-Berkeley scientists who suggest that the state could be on the verge of an impending water shortage. According to predictions by researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the continual global warming associated with increasing atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide may leave the state of California with serious water problems over the next 50 years. Biosolids in the News Attached for your review is an unusually high number of biosolids-related newspaper articles that have been published throughout California during the past month. An article of particular interest to the District appeared in the February 9 edition of the Riverside Press-Enterprise. This article reports on alleged illnesses caused by "illegally high levels of germs"found in "Orange County' biosolids that were spread on thousands of acres of farmland in Riverside County. The biosolids in question Members of the Board Page 4 February 21, 2001 were supplied by the Aliso Water Management Agency-South East Regional Reclamation Authority(AWMA-SERRA). AWMA-SERRA provides wastewater treatment for Dana Point, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Mission Viejo, San Clemente and other coastal communities in southern Orange County. AWMA-SERRA, and its biosolids management contractor Synagro were found by EPA to not meet the Class B biosolids pathogen reduction requirement for viruses, bacteria and other infectious organisms. However, EPA's investigation of the violation determined that the"increased risk of contamination was slight." Violations of biosolids regulations by any municipality make it difficult to continue to utilize land application as a viable biosolids management option. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors will be addressing the health, environmental impacts, and quality of life concerns related to biosolids at both their February 27 and March 13 Board meetings. District's staff will be attending these meetings and report on their outcome. Orange County Water District Approves Groundwater Cleanup Plan The Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District has approved $2.18 million for the first phase of a project designed to minimize further migration of chlorinated hydrocarbons (industrial solvents and degreasers) into the groundwater basin. These volatile organic compounds have been released in the groundwater over the past 20 to 30 years by multiple industrial sources in Anaheim, Fullerton and Placentia. Orange County Council of Governments Retains McIntyre Don McIntyre has been retained by OCCOG to look at the long-term issue of how it can function without being completely dependent on SCAG dollars. Don has agreed to work for about three months to meet with other COGS as well as city managers in Orange County and develop suggestions on how the COG can grow beyond what it is today. Over the past few years, the OCCOG board has wanted to get involved in a number of regional issues (beyond the SCAG arena), but this can only be accomplished if new funding sources (such as grants)are sought. "Brine Line" Proposed for East Ventura County Calleguas Municipal Water District is studying a 30-mile, $50 million dollar pipeline from Simi Valley to the Pacific Ocean to carry salt discharges. It would function much like our Santa Ana River Interceptor line. The Calleguas watershed is made up of arroyos and creeks that shuttle runoff and sewage treatment plant discharges from eastern Ventura County, through Camarillo and into Mugu Lagoon. The line would help the area meet new EPA regulations. Costs would be mitigated by federal and state funds. Members of the Board Page 5 February 21, 2001 Supervisor Silva Promotes Ongoing Cooperation Between County and District The attached letter and MOU outlines what's ahead for the work related to dry weather runoff from the Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed and protection of Huntington Beach. Federal-State-Local Santa Ana River Watershed Management MOU is Signed. Sealed and Delivered The attached letter from the USDA conveys the MOU that has now been signed by 23 agencies. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like ad nal information on any of the above items, please call me. 4Bla arson General Manager BPA:jt G MP GTAUDMJWGMETTEn TO THE BOARDWIV=LDOG Attachments Water/NewsAlert- Story Pagel of3. Orange County Sanitation District Partners With Chapman University to Boost Leadership Strengths Business Wire- February 02,2001 21:10 ORANGE, Calif:-(BUSINESS WIRE)—Feb. 2, 2001-- Taking Customized Education Into The Workplace Is New And Growing Trend In Higher Education With an eye focused firmly on realizing its vision of achieving world-class leadership in water resource management,the Orange County Sanitation District is collaborating with Chapman University's Organizational Leadership program to provide customized leadership development education for district employees. The program represents a growing trend in higher education of extending the boundaries of the traditional classroom into the workplace,according to university and sanitation district officials. Called LEAD (Leadership Education and Development)the six-month program, which began Jan. 30, is designed to provide employees with opportunities to develop specific leadership competencies such as communicating authentically,building shared vision,and thinking systemically. LEAD embraces a concept known as servant leadership, a management philosophy that recognizes that the primary role of a leader is to serve others,enabling them to become leaders themselves. An added benefit is that those who master the concept are likely to see that it makes a difference in their personal as well as their professional lives. LEAD is co-facilitated by Mark Maier, Ph.D., founding chair of Chapman's Organizational Leadership program, and-Kevin Brame, a graduate of Chapman's masters degree program in Organizational Leadership and co-director of the Orange County Fire Authority's Leadership Institute. Also assisting in delivering the program are OCSD team leaders Lisa Arosteguy and Tom Flanagan. "The way to work effectively with people in the organization and outside of the organization is the power of relationships; you can't accomplish what is necessary without them," said OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson. "We concluded that developing relationships was the way to improve the organization. We accepted the challenge of Chapman's LEAD program to meet that goal." LEAD "specifically flows from Chapman's vision of reaching beyond the boundaries of the classroom," said Maier. "Customizing leadership development to the specific needs of an organization and taking it directly into the workplace has proven to be an extremely effective method of helping http://www.water.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CoNO:ObKbytaZotq 2/14/O1 Water/NewsAlert-Story Page 2 ofS- Y companies better prepare their employees to excel personally and professionally,and to create a ;. winning environment that enables the organization to clarify and carry out its vision and mission." Officials at the sanitation district characterize LEAD as"action learning." "It's probably the hottest approach in leadership development today," said Flanagan. "Organizational learning occurs when you apply leadership concepts and skills to the job. People understand the concepts from an intellectual standpoint,but internalizing them and putting them into practice are only afforded through applying them on the job.The concepts and skills learned are not an add-on to the job;they become part of thejob. "Our managers and employees already do an excellent job.We want to take it to the next level, and we feel that leadership development continually supports that pursuit of excellence here at the agency," said Flanagan. Founded in 1994,Chapman's OL program is recognized as one of the most effective and progressive organizational leadership programs in the nation. In 1998 the Association of Leadership Educators named it Outstanding Leadership Program of the Year. An integral part of Chapman's College of Lifelong Learning,the program was established to meet public,non-profit and private sector organizations'growing need for managers who could successfully integrate the interpersonal,spiritual and creative aspects of leadership. Chapman is the only institution of higher learning in the country that offers leadership degrees at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Currently more than 600 students are enrolled at the bachelor's and master's degree levels. In Southern California, it is offered at the university's main campus in Orange, as well as several of Chapman's branch campuses,including Irvine,San Diego,Manhattan Beach/Los Angeles, Ontario and Moreno Valley. The oldest, largest and most comprehensive independent university in Orange County,Chapman is ranked in U.S.News&World Report's top tier of western region universities and colleges, and is ranked as a"best value" institution.In addition,it is one of only 100 American colleges and universities to be recognized by the prestigious Templeton Guide: Colleges that Encourage Character Development. The Orange County Sanitation District is a public agency responsible for safely collecting, treating and disposing wastewater(sewage)and industrial waste.It is a special district, separate from the County of Orange or any city government,established under the State Health and Safety Code,to provide sewerage service to a specific geographic area. The Orange County Sanitation District is governed by a 25-member board of directors comprised of the presiding officers of the local sewering agencies or cities within its 470-square- mile service area. View all of Chapman University's news and information online at htto://www.chapman.edu. OCSD news and information can be viewed online at httpJ/www.ocsd.com. CONTACT: The Wilck Group Nadine Wilck (for Chapaan University) , 949/487-3633 wilckpr8earthlink.net or Orange County Sanitation District Lisa Lawson, 714/593-7120 http://www.water.newsalert.com/bin/story?Storyld=CoNO:ObKbytaZotq 2/14/01 Huntington beach Independent Page 1 of i I I NEWS ews ^ Go Cn Thursday, January 11,2001 More testing of Surf City beach waters ordered . Sanitation district to determine if AES Corp.'s cooling water intake lines are source of contamination. By TAPJQ MALIK HUNTINGTON BEACH--The Orange County Sanitation District is preparing for more testing of city beach and ocean waters in the summer to clarify whether its partially treated sewage discharge contributed to high levels of bacteria along the shore. District officials are investigating if an interaction between a discharge pipe that extends more than four miles out to sea and the AES Corp.'s cooling water intake lines provides a means for bacteria and waste water to creep back toward the beach. The sanitation district pumps about 240 million gallons of waste water into the ocean daily, while the AES power plant typically collects about 300 million gallons of sea water for cooling purposes. The interaction between the two systems was one of three possible causes identified last year by UC Irvine scientists. The other two were urban runoff and waste from water birds at the Talbert Marsh. Sanitation district scientists conducted preliminary tests Nov. 27 to iron out proper sediment and water collection techniques before a full testing program is begun in April. District officials will then be able to study the thermocline,a blanket of warm water acting as an inversion layer to suppress the effluent. During the test,water samples from the area surrounding the outflow pipe were collected in the morning,with additional samples taken hourly along the beach. District officials said the test found waste water traveling up to within 1.5 miles of the shore, closer than previously seen, with a finger-shaped plume pointing toward the power plant on Newland Street. "We'd expected to find that bacteria surged inward toward the beach around high tide and then naturally receded back out with the water as the day went on," said Charles McGee, a microbiologist and lab supervisor for the sanitation district. "But our beach tests found bacteria in ankle-deep water in the http://www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/news/2001 011 1/thb0004012.html 01/15/2001 Huntington Beach Independent Page 2 of 2 afternoon,at low tide." The results,he added,raised more questions than answers ' because the beach-side bacteria did not come from the waste- water plume,which never reached the shore. Ocean water testing is now planned for the afternoon as well. One factor,whose effect remains to be seen,is AES' water intake,which collected only about 2,000 gallons in November. But district officials take heart in the fact that now there is a measure of the waste-water field while the plants intake is minimal,which will be useful during later tests when the pipe is working at full tilt. "This month,we're pulling together an external Technical Advisory Committee made up of scientists,community and city officials,as well as a steering committee,to be sure that all the players are involved,"said Lisa Lawson,spokeswoman for the district. "We're hoping to schedule our initial meeting at the end of the month or first part of February." AES President Ed Blackford did not return phone calls. Huntington Beach spokesman Rich Barnard said city officials will be involved as the sanitation district testing continues. Feedback to hbindvna.latimes.com Copyright 2000 Times Commmity News httpJ/www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/news/20010111/thb0004012.htm1 01/15/2001 Huntington Beach Independent Pagel of 2 i � ' t -No ' i NEWS ews = co Teachers > Thursday,January 11,2001 Sewage spill reporting protocols clarified ■ Surf City officials want to accurately track problems in an attempt to avoid a repeat of this month's grand jury hearings. By Tit RIO MALlK HUNTINGTON BEACH-- While the Orange County Grand Jury continues its investigation into allegations that the city failed to properly report massive sewer leaks beneath the Downtown area,city officials have been hard at work revamping procedures for reporting such spills. Assistant City Administrator Bill Workman said that over the last few weeks,new measures have been put in place to ensure that sewage spills can be accurately tracked, contained and cleaned. "We're scheduled to begin additional training for our crews this week to arm them with the most updated knowledge in sewage leak control," Workman said. "Our Fire Department has always been on target in being able to respond and report surface spills ... but for subsurface spills,there's been some concern over what[leaks] were and weren't being reported." Between Jan. 4 and Monday, the grand jury heard testimony from six city employees, including City Administrator Ray Silver, Public Works Director Robert Beardsley, Don Noble, the city's maintenance manager,and Jerry Dilks, a crew leader _in the Public Works Department,to provide information about the sewer breaks.The result of those testimonies is undetermined, officials in the Orange County district attorney's office said Monday. At issue are massive breaks in sewer lines running beneath Downtown and Old Town Huntington Beach.The leaks were first spotted in 1996 during video camera surveys of the sewer system, and have since been repaired by the city. Officials at the California Regional Water Quality Control Board's Santa Ana office said they were not notified about the breaks four years ago,and issued an order last month that the city find and clean any remaining sewage, as well as present a plan on how to track bacteria, if any,in the residue by Feb. 7. Mark Adelson, an environmental specialist and chief of surveillance and enforcement at the water board's Santa Ana office, said he has briefed the city on what the state agency's http://www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/news/20010111/thb0003985.html 01/15/2001 Huntington Beach Independent Page 2 of 2 expectations are concerning leaky sewers. "We've basically boiled it down to the five Cs: contain, control,communicate,cleanup and calculate,"he said. The first action in a sewer break is to contain the spilled sewage,then work crews must control the source, Adelson said. A city should then communicate with all various organizations and oversight agencies,like the water board,with an interest in the sewer spill. Finally,it is necessary for the city to clean and decontaminate any areas affected by the spill,and calculate how much volume was not contained through the city's actions. Water officials said the only statutory law requiring the reporting of sewer leaks applies to spills of more than 1,000 gallons,though there is an administrative law prohibiting any type of surface discharging. Also,they added, all spills must be reported to the area's local health officer. City officials have disputed the water board's claim that more than 70,000 gallons of raw sewage a day spilled into the ground, stating there is no true way to verify that number. The city discussed the sewer leaks and reporting with the Orange County Health Agency in August 1996, and again in 1999 as part of coastal water pollution investigation meetings. Workman said that most of the new reporting protocols put in place deal with documenting the chain of command and accountability work crews and leaders should go through to report future sewer breaks. They also include additional training on how to fix broken waste water pipes to preserve the health and safety of the public,while not compromising that of the worker. Feedback to hbindv(allatimes.com Copyright 2000 Times Community News http://www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/news/2001 0111/thb0003985.html 01/15/2001 The Orange County Register Thunday,lan.ta.Hql THE WAVE/ SANITATION DISTRICT DOES NOT DESERVE KUDOS I must take exception to Bill Borden's Jan. It column,titled 'Plan for waste water a big first, W.11 OR, let's set the record straight First of a4 no kudos are appropriate for Orange County Sanitation,and rll start am by saying that it's because,_ among other things,they have resisted change in the past.Sme, they are starting to come aroand,but theirs caved damage control and public pressure. I.know because rm in the middle of that pressure. The centerpiece of my campaign for Huntington Beach City Council was the now infamous "301(b)"waiver,that allows,as I have said many tames, Or- ange County Sandaion to dump effluent off our coast without secondary,treatment This,my friends,means live pathogens are entering the wa- ter-all in the interest of saving a few bucks! This is not cause for kudos! Au-contraire! Also, the whole idea of pumping ow treated waste into the aquifers is insane. Bill, you are wrong on both wants. . Joseph Raoano (Edits note: Joseph Raono was an unsuccessful mndidate for City Coun tl in the November gent oral element) OCREGISTER.COM: Liberty Online Page 1 of 4 ` �I2 liberty online Home Page.________! m t 0009ISter.Com THE ORANGE COUNTY Retas n IA=fUSI SEARCH OUR HOME PAGE TCREDO: the orange grove TODAY'S NEWS ADVERTISING The ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS S FINANCE OWOSFINOER On the trail of germs that CLASSIFIEDS COLUMNS pollute O.C. coast COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME,COURTS a LAW EDUCATION ENTERTAINMENT January 28,2001 FUN a GAMES HEALTH S FITNESS Sanitation officials will investigate effluents Shelo s Cad" at Huntington Beach LIVING&POLITICS a SHOPPING GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE SCIENCE a BLAKE P. TECHNOLOGY SERVICThere is considerable ANDERSON PROMOTIONS interestinterest in the shoreline SPORTS S RECREATION bacterial contamination a Mr. Anderson TRAVEL WEATHER problems in Huntington is general Beach. For the last two years manager of there have been dozens of the Orange press stories detailing the County health advisories, shoreline Sanitation closings, corrective District. measures, studies and comments surrounding this important public issue. Millions of dollars and thousands of hours are being spent to understand the causes of and the cures for this perplexing problem. I believe that it is time for the community to hear directly from one of the principal participants in all of this: the Orange County Sanitation District. The questions we must answer to the satisfaction of the Orange County community are these: Are the 240 million gallons per day of treated wastewater leaving the sanitation district's five-mite outfall pipe the reason for the beach contamination? If so,what will be done about it? We plan to answer http://www.ocregister.com/liberty/orangegrove.shtml 01/29/2001 OCREGISTER.COM: Liberty Online Page 2 of 4 these questions during the coming year. During the summer of 1999,the county health officer posted and closed stretches of the ocean in Huntington Beach because of the presence of indicator bacteria. Studies of the issue began in 1999 and continued through 2000.The summer of 2000 studies concluded from environmental data that urban runoff and natural contamination in the Talbert Marsh were likely sources of continuing beach contamination. The studies also concluded that groundwater in the area flows inland and away from the beach so a sewer leak cannot reach the beach directly. A new hypothesis was suggested by researchers from UCI that the discharge plume from OCSD's ocean outfall pipe five miles offshore could potentially be pulled shoreward by localized currents created by cooling water used by the power plant on Pacific Coast Highway in Huntington Beach.OCSD is taking this hypothesis very seriously. During the summer of 2001,we will conduct a comprehensive and extensive study of the waters, currents and sediments off Huntington Beach to test the hypothesis. This work will add to the existing information we have compiled during the past 25 years on the ocean conditions off the coast of Huntington Beach. In preparation and in anticipation of the summer work,new sediment collection methods and bacteriological analytical methods were tested in October 2000.A one-day water quality survey combined with beach bacteria monitoring was performed in November 2000. During the single-day testing that occurred in late November,our waste water plume did not reach the shore,but it got uncomfortably close. A narrow finger of the plume,pointing toward the power plant cooling water discharge point,got to within 1.5 miles of the shore. Of equal interest was the discovery that shoreline bacteria levels rose that same afternoon,corresponding to the end of the tidal cycle. The characteristics of indicator bacteria found on the shoreline were different than those from our offshore http://www.ocregister.com/liberty/orangegrove.shtmi 01/29/2001 OCREGISTER.COM: Liberty Online Page 3 of 4 plume. This could mean that some other unknown source was contributing to high bacteria levels that day. These very early data give us more questions than answers,but help us to design the summer 2001 studies. We are taking a very open approach in how we design, conduct and interpret the results of the coming summer's work.The public,the press,the scientific and regulatory communities and interested elected public officials will remain fully informed about what we are doing.They will be invited to every meeting we hold and encouraged to review all of the information we collect. We are doing this for two reasons:First, it is the right thing to do.We are a public agency in the public arena with the potential of impacting the health and welfare of the citizens of Orange County. We owe everyone strict accountability. Second,it is the smart thing to do. We must insure that the community will believe we have done our work competently and honestly. We can demonstrate this only if we do our work in plain view of the community. There are two possible outcomes of our studies.If our work confirms that our plume does not reach the shore,then members of the community who are concerned about our operation and who are already insisting that we provide additional treatment and disinfection must trust our results. If our work confirms that our discharge plume does reach shore,then the OCSD board of directors and the ratepaying public must be convinced that additional operational and capital facilities spending to change our operations is well justified. We want to be certain that the summer 2001 tests are the best we can design. For this reason,a list of experts in oceanography,environmental studies and water quality regulations, along with individuals representing environmental groups,business, tourism and the general public,has been compiled. We will enlist the assistance of these people in developing the experiments for testing the http://www.ocregister.comAiberty/orangegrove.shtmi 01/29/2001 OCREGISTER.COM: Liberty Online Page 4 of 4 hypothesis. The decision we ultimately make must be based on sound evidence.Public health and the environment must be adequately protected. We need to be certain that our actions will actually improve public health protection and give our community reason to believe that their interests have been well served by OCSD. This summer we will collect and report the facts to support the decisions that protect the interests and meet the expectations of the community we serve. IWMW" You're on your own without it Copyright 2001 The Orange County Register Please send comments to Oglyglglel�ll@yf(Q9Q9m eORl http://www.ocregister.com/liberty/orangegrove.shtml 01/29/2001 O mplete yut1r Bachelor's degree at Peppenline ttamrr: Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News, Business spar hap:/Ary .latimes.com/news/science/envirOW20010128/t000008260.htmi P IS IISg Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopnine music,movies,an, labs,homes.cars, Back to story N,restaurants gals Sunday,January 28,2001 Pollution Theory Upends Testing is If it's home out that ocean-dumped sewage washes back four miles to Huntington Beach,two decades of monitoring missed it.And a power plant's plan makes an answer urgent. By MEG JAMES,Times Staff water For two decades,water quality tests seemed to prove that piping partially treated sewage into the ocean four miles off Huntington Beach was cost-effective and safe. So when high levels of bacteria forced health officials to close the city's shoreline for most of the summer of 1999 and again in 2000,no one even considered that the Orange County Sanitation District's"outfall"pipe could be a factor. Now,however,a group of UC Irvine scientists suspect that the district's water tests missed a quirky phenomenon:a combination of tidal forces and wane water released by a nearby power plant drawing bacteria- laden sewage toward shore. If true,it could have a nearly billion-dollar bite for the town known around the world as Surf City,and the 2.2 million users served by the sanitation district in north and central Orange County. The district will soon begin testing the UCI scientists'theory. But it will take months,if not years,to know the answer for sure,experts say. "Nature doesn't give up its secrets so easily,"said Larry Honeyboume,chief of the county Heath Care Agency's water quality division. There is some urgency to find a solution,and not only for the tourist-driven Huntington Beach economy. Califomia's energy crisis has given momentum to plans to double the capacity of the power plant run by AES- Huntington Beach,a private power generator,by June 1.Scientists question whether starting up another two boiler units could multiply any backwash of sewage. If the outfall is eventually implicated,the district would have to find other ways to treat 245 million gallons of sewage discharged each day--solutions that could cost at least$400 million over the next decade. "You're talking billions of dollars,"said Clinton D.Winant,a physical oceanographer with Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Other Orange County beach communities have had repealed closures because of pollution--sewage spills and urban runoff--but Huntington Beach's problem has proved particularly vexing.Bird droppings and other pollutants from Talbert Marsh and Santa Ana River runoff are likely curt rits.Myriad tests over the past 1 1/2 years indicate that neither the marsh nor the river runoff could account for the volume of pollutants found.Nor could they explain unusually high concentrations of bacteria in the surf just west of the Newland Street power plant. • r • Some scientists have scoffed at the UCI researchers'hypothesis,first offered last November. But results of sanitation district tests,released earlier this month,showed that a forger-shaped plume of bacteria was moving to within about 1 1/4 mile of Huntington Beach's shores.Sanitation district scientists and engineers were caught off guard by the Nov.27 tests,since previous monitoring spanning 20 years failed to show that pollutants from the pipe,discharged at a depth of nearly 200 feet four miles offshore,could return so close to the beach. It was also news to the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency and the California Water Quality Control Board.Three years ago,both had approved renewal of permits to allow the sanitation district to pump the partially treated effluent offshore. "We were a little surprised by it,"said Terry Fleming,an EPA environmental scientist in San Francisco. "The basic assumption was that we haven't seen a problem in 20 years,so it's likely that the problem doesn't exist." Sewage discharges have long been controversial.Los Angeles used to release partially treated sewage into Santa Monica Bay until fish kills and chronic beach contamination prompted federal lawsuits that lasted more than a decade. Ending the furor cost the city more than$1.6 billion to expand the Hyperion treatment plant near Los Angeles International Airport. Long after the EPA cracked down on Los Angeles,it has continued to exempt Orange County and three other communities--San Diego,Goleta and Mono Bay--from the provisions of the U.S.Clean Water Act.When federal officials approved Orange County's exemption in 1998,they cited the sanitation district's data that the sewage plume Floated intact several miles off Huntington Beach. Sanitation district scientists now say they never tested the waters along the ocean floor.They also failed to consider the impact of the power plant's intake and discharge pipes,a system less than a mile offshore and which cycles 300 million gallons of ocean water a day. In December,AES officials began submitting documents to the state in seeking approval to nearly double the capacity of their facility ASS would do that by reactivating two of its five boiler-unit generators,said FA Blackford,site manager of Ne power plant. The two inactive units have not been used since 1995,when California had plenty of inexpensive power.But reactivating them—a$145-million project that the company says would generate enough to power 1,000 homes- -also would require the plant to use more ocean water for cooling,Blackford said. And discharging that heated water could cause more contamination problems at the beach,if the UCI scientists'theory proves true. "It's a little premature to say whether it will be of a concern,"Blackford said."But clearly we're in favor of clean beaches,and we want to get to the bottom of the[Huntington Beach pollution]problem just like everyone else." rrr Some scientists believe Huntington Beach's pollution problems are caused by a confluence of factors: proximity to Talbert Marsh,which is home to large populations of waterfowl and appears to be a breeding ground for bacteria;the mouth of the Santa Ana river,which carries when runoff to the sea;the power plant; and the sanitation district's outfall pipe. Environmentalists are critical of state and federal permits that in 1998 allowed the sanitation district to continue discharging sewage that does not meet the standards of the federal Clean Water Act. "Orange County has overwhelmed itself by population,"said Mark Massam,coastal programs director for the California chapter of the Sierra Club. "And the fact that you canjust dump raw sewage into the ocean and somehow say that you're protected just doesn't pass the laugh test.There is no reason that we should be playing fast and loose with the rules." But 20 years of water quality tests by the sanitation district and others seemed to show that the sewage stayed clumped together more than two miles offshore.The belief was that a water temperature inversion layer, called a thermocline,acted as a lid to keep pollutants packed together about 45 feet below the surface. "What was done in 1998 was not a mistake,"said Gerard J.Thibeault,director of the California Water Quality Control Board's Santa Ana region,which granted a five-yew ocean damping permit to the sanitation district. "At that point there was not any scientific evidence that there was a problem.In fact,all of the scientific evidence pointed tojust the opposite." The sanitation district wasn't trying to overlook a backwash of bacteria,officials said.But it may have been looking in the wrong place. "Historically,we had never seen any evidence of the plume coming into shallower waters,"said district microbiologist Charles McGee."We assumed that the plume would look like an ink spot or a cloud.We never considered that it would be something that would slide in under the radar.Ifsjust a different way of looking at it." Keith Stolunbach,a UCLA professor who has studied the sewage plume off Huntington Beach,said Stanley Grant and the other UCI researchers benefited from mountains of data collected by the sanitation district,but also by fresh pain of eyes. "The pieces of this theory are not new,but the possibility that these strong surges could bring sewage back to the beach is a very new idea,"Stolunbach said. rrr Some opponents already me organizing to oppose renewal of the EPA exemption when it expires in 2003, should the sanitation district apply for another waiver.The EPA's Fleming said it is too early to say whether the district will lose the exemption. "We have to determine if them is a real problem or not,"Fleming said,adding that the sanitation agency "seems to be making a good-faith effort to find out what's happening." Said Scripps'Winant,"You really can't mle anything out.There is really not a good understanding of the ocean processes going on out there." Fleming and others have not ruled out other possible bacteria sources.Runoff dreining into the ocean from the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh are still suspects.The marsh,new the beach,'lust north of the Santa Ana River,has a large population of western gulls roosting on mudfiats.During storms,the marsh fills up.And tides sweep in and out of the marsh,perhaps carrying bird droppings rich in bacteria. "The marsh plays a role;it provides a background level of bacteria,"said UCI researcher Brett F.Sanders. "But this mysterious problem near the power plant also occurs"when them have been no storms to increase the marsh runoff. Robert S.Hellman,Southern California coordinator for the National Marine Fisheries Service,agreed it was likely that Huntington Beach's pollution goes beyond bird droppings. "There are a multitude of wetlands up and down the coast,and none of them have these sine type of problems,"said Hoffman. The sanitation district is forming a panel of scientists to help design a winprehensive ocean monitoring Program to test the UCI raeamhers'theory this spring and summer.The panel will mat for the first time Monday. "Whatever happens during the summer could mean significant operational changes for us,"said Lisa Lawson,the districts spokeswoman. If the outfall is the source of much of the high concentrations of bacteria,agency officials said,they would have to consider so-called secondary levels of treatment for all sewage discharged.The district now releases a blend of primary and secondary treated sewage. rrr In primary treatment,chemicals and thickening agents are used to separate and remove waste solids,which carry the most bacteria.During secondary treatment,or the second level of treatment,naturally occurring bacteria are added to dissolve still more solids. Lawson said it would take at least few yews and cost more than$400 million to build the facilities necessary for full secondary treatment.Operational costs would add S15 million a year. Even with full secondary treatment,not all of the bacteria would be removed,"so the issue at the beech still might not be resolved,"Lawson said. The district could opt to disinfect the sewage,extend the 25-year-old outfall pipe farther offshore or build a new one.A new pipe would cost at least$170 million.Still,experts say it isn't certain this would solve the bacteria problem. Disinfectant systems could work,but that would cost at tent$40 million.And because disinfecting sewage is most effective when used on secondary treated sewage,the cost would balloon to nearly a half-billion dollars. With rigorous testing still being devised,sanitation district officials caution that it's far too soon to settle on a plan. "We want to make sure that we're doing the right thing so that ratepayers and taxpayers aren't paying for anything extra,"McGee said."If we are involved in this in some way,then we're going to change what we do before anyone tells us that we have to." • r • How Clean? Sanitation district officials this year will test a theory that sewage discharged from an outfall pipe is coming ashore along Huntington Beach. If the premise proves true,the district will have to change its treatment process.That could mean full secondary treatment,which would cost$400 million for new facilities; disinfecting the waste with chemicals,ultraviolet light or reverse osmosis;or perhaps extending the outfall pipe farther offshore. • PRELIMINARY TREATMENT Bar screens remove solids from sewage Grit remover filters out non-organic materials • PRIMARY TREATMENT 70%solids removed• Settling basin removes solids " SECONDARY TREATMENT 85%solids removed• Aeration basin breaks up organic material Settling basin removes micro-organisms • Figure refers to percentage of suspended solids&oxygen-depleting compounds removed from treated wastewater Source:Orange County Sanitation District Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times f Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section I Page # Date Su ject Orange County Register %a� I Mm64Aay IRA;L o� �&— Ms 11 On the trail of germs that pollute O.C. coast Sanitation ofTi w& will investigate effluents at Huntington Beach T here is considerable in- OCSD is taking this hypothesis We are doing this for two reasons: .. feces[inthe shoroo-Ivery seriously.During the summerFirst•st is the right thing[o do.We teria contain na[on prob of 2001,we will conduct a compre- are a public agency in the public lens in Huntington Beach., hensive and extensive study of the arena with the potential of impacting For the last two years I waters,currents and sediments off the health and welfare of the citizens there have been dozens of press sto- Huntington Beach to test the by- of Orange County.We owe everyone lies detailing the health advisories, pothesis.This work will add to the slrim accountability.Second,it is the shoreline closings,corrective mew- existing information we have com- smart thing to do.We must insure, BLAKE P. sures,studies and comments sar- piled during the past 25 years on the that the community will believe we rounding this important public issue. ocean conditions off the coast of have done our work competently and ANDERSON MJlions of dollars and thousands of Huntington Beach. honestly.We can demonstrate this ►Mr. hours are being spent to understand In preparation and in anticipation only if we do our work in plain view Anderson is the causes of and the cures for this of the summer work,new sediment of the community.There are two pos- general perplexing problem. collection methods and bacteriolog- sible outcomes of our studies.If our manager of I believe that it is time for the ical analytical methods were tested in work wall that our plume does the Orange community to hear directly from one October 2000.A me-day water qual- not reach the shore,then members of County of the the community who are concerned principal County S is in all of sty survey combined with beach bac- Sanitation District. ithect.Th Orange County Sanitation tech monitoring was performed in about our operation and who aredd al- District. Distrim.The questions we must an- November 2000. ready insisting that we provide addi- swer to the satisfaction of the Orange During the single-day testing that tional treatment and disinfection County community are these;Are the occurred in late November,our most trust our results.H our work ABOUT 240 million gallons per day of treated wastegrine did not reach the confirms that our discharge plume 11iE GUEST wastewater leaving the sanitation din- shore, t uncomfortably close. does reach shore,then the OCSD COLUMN; hict's five-toile outfall pipe the Tea- A narrr ofthe plume,point- ' boa.'d of directors and the ratepaying Guest son for the beach contamination?If seattopowerplantcooling public must be convinced that addi- columnists are so,what will be done about it?We water e point,got to within tional operational and capital fad - local writers plans to answer these questions dur- - ities spending to change our oper- with a point mg the coming Year., LS miles of the shore.Of equal in. ations is well justified. of view about During the summer of 1999,the terest was the discovery that shore- We want to be certain that the officer posted and line bacteria levels rose that same at- summer 2001 tests are the best we local,state or county health closed stretches of the ocean in Hun- ternwn,wrresponding'[o the end of can design.For this reason,a list of national is- the tidal We.The characteristics of experts in oceano a h environ- sues.We're engton Beach because ofthe pres- indicator bacteria found on the shore- mental studies and water looking for enSt di indicate bacteria quality pre reg- good irking Studies of the issue began in IS ourline were different than those from sari ns,along with individuals groups, repre familiarity and continued through 20D0.The our offshore plume.This could mean bunting ,tourism groups, summer of 2000 studies concluded that some other high bast source was business,tourism and the general with h p issue, from environmental data that urban contributing s high bacteria levels enlist,has been compiled. e p will s fresh per- that day.These very early data give enlist the assistance of these people inactive—all j runoff and mturalush were likely contamination in us more questions than answers,but in developing the experiments for words.Senndd the Talbert Marsh sources of continuing beach wntam- in about help us to design the summer ting 20DI tes the hypothesus. on umtion.The studies also concluded studies' The decision n ultimately make submissions n, We are taking a very open ap- must be based on sound evidence. Guest Column, that groundwater in the be ach a flows Commentary, sewed and away from thea be proach in how we design,conduct public health and the environment and interpret the results of the com- must be adequately protected We The Orange sewer leak cannot reach the beach di- ing summer's work The public,the need to be certain that our actions County Regis- redly.b new hypothesis was bug- p ter,P.O.Box gusted by researchers from UCI that press,the scientificnn and regulatory will actually improve public health 11626, Santa the discharge plume from OCSD's communities and interested elected Protection and give our community purse officials will remain fully in- reason to believe that their interests Ana,Calif., ocean outfaU pipe five miles offshore 92711;fax: could potentially be pulled shoreward formed about what we are doing have base well served by OCSD.This 714-796-3657; by localized currents created by cool- They will be invited to every meeting summer we will wUect and report email: let- seat water used by the power plant on we hold and encouraged to review all- the facts to support the decisions that protect the interests and meet tersOlink. pack Coast Highway in Huntington of the information we collect We ex- Beach. pectations of the community we beedom.com serve Scientists plan to analyze outfall pipe Page 1 of 2 Home Page __,-___-,._�� M community news Home - iL OCregIStee:COm THE ORANGE COHINTYREGISTER IABOUTUSI SEARCH %� than spaghetti and HOME PAGE Looking for more ` s p g TODAY'S NEWS meatballs? ADVERTISING ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS S FINANCE Scientists plan to analyze outfall OCJOBFINDER CLASSIFIEDS pipe COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS •Today's Sudes ENVIRONMENT: The research will focus on the :city Reesumes local impact of pumping treated sewage into the :Com munity Co Events w ocean. •Education EI Toro •Firexatch •Growth January 30,2001 -Obituaries •Politics 8 Government •Register In Education By OLIVIA HAWKINSON -Religion The Orange County Register -special Features CRIME,COURTS 8 LAW EDUCATION A group of scientists is considering both high-tech methods ENTERTAINMENT and some no-tech ones - such as sinkingcages of mussels into FUN a GAMES g HEALTH a FITNESS the sea-to test whether treated sewage pumped to the ocean LIVING S SHOPPING could influence high bacteria levels along Huntington State OPINION POLITICS& Beach. GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE SCIENCE& Activists, engineers and water-quality regulators, organized by TECHNOLOGY the Orange County Sanitation District,said at a brainstorming SERVICES & NS session Monday that they hope to start testing by May 1. In one SPORTS a RECREATION high-tech option, scientists would sample at different ocean TRAVEL depths to build a three-dimensional model of bacteria WEATHER concentrations. County and city officials have spent more than$4 million and 18 months investigating the mysterious bacteria plaguing Huntington's waters. Scientists from the sanitation district, the University of California, Irvine, and other public institutions will study 8.25 square miles of ocean off Huntington state and city beaches-a rectangular area roughly bounded by Goldenwest Street, the Newport Pier, the shoreline and about four miles out to sea. They're especially interested in the little-studied area from about a half-mile offshore to two miles offshore along the state beach. http://www.ocregister.com/communitylsewer00130cci.shtml 01/30/2001 Scientists plan to analyze outfall pipe Page 2 of 2 "Except for Nov. 27, we didn't sample near the shore in the past," said Charlie McGee,a microbiologist at the sanitation district. "This is where the question mark is. That's why we're here today." The Nov. 27 study surprised scientists by revealing for the first time an offshore"finger" of bacteria- a plume of treated sewage from an outfall pipe-pointing toward an area of the beach near Newland Street. The discovery could support a recent theory that the AES power plant's cooling system may suck bacteria from the sanitation districts outfall pipe back to the state beach. The sanitation district will pay$500,000 to$1 million for this summer's study. For information about Monday's meeting and the planned study,call (714)593-7120 or visit http;,//www.2c4d.com You're on your own without it. Copyright 2001 The Orange County Register Please seM comments 10 ocnilmer Iink.freedom.com http://www.ocregister.com/community/sewer00130cci.shtml 01/30/2001 LA Times .30AZO L Page 1 of 2 Overdelrver, underspend. �AM M: d=21 Site Man I aumima I Print I DismissionI Ad", y News Business Sports htlpJN~.laamee.omW o unWasiraswoc_besM_GOes/20010201Mb00001 Politics Trovel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shoosins TYBIC,i,as M.homaa. Back to story IV.malaP9nn gn.I WIS Thursday, February 1, 2001 News from Fountain Valley in the Times Community Newspapers Sanitation district gathers input on water contamination ■Experts theorize that Huntington Beach's AES Corp. water cooling system interacts with district's waste water outfall. By TARIO MALIK FOUNTAIN VALLEY--Oceanographers,environmentalists and microbiologists packed the control center auditorium at the Orange County Sanitation District's waste water plant on Ellis Avenue on Monday to review ocean water tests for spring and summer. The meeting brought together about 45 experts to form a technical advisory committee to help the district test a theory that its waste water plume from an outfall pipe may interact with an ocean water cooling system used by the AES Corp.power plant in Huntington Beach.This correlation may draw sewage shoreward, and therefore be one of reasons for water contamination and beach closures. In addition to representatives from environmental groups,regulatory agencies and other coastal officials,the committee included UC Irvine scientists who put forth the theory as a possible cause, as well as bird waste from the Talbert Marsh, and urban runoff. "We are thrilled that everybody we hoped would attend did," said Lisa Lawson,the district's spokeswoman. 'Now we have a set group of experts that who well be able to reach out to for input and comment on our study." Han Tan,an engineer with AES,said he appreciated the lead taken by the sanitation district to get to the bottom of this matter. "I think this was a very productive meeting, and we'll continue to work closely with the sanitation district on this matter," Tan said. "We want to be able to determine whether the power station is part of the contamination problem,and if so,do everything we can to solve and control it." But some committee members thought the study may need a broader scope. Vic Liepzig, a former Huntington Beach mayor and executive director of the environmental group Orange Coast Watch, said focusing on the relationship between AES and district as the possible cause to beach bacteria contamination may be a mistake. "It doesn't do the district any good to just address that question," he said, adding that a"yes" answer would comfort some members of the public,putting to rest the doubt on the subject,but a"no" answer would not. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bintprint.cgi 02/05/2001 LA Times Page 2 of 2 "Regardless of what the source is,we're looking to find that," he said. Committee members formed three groups Monday, one to study the long-term objectives of ocean testing, a second to review how the county's watershed could be affected, and a final group to go over the UC Irvine hypothesis in detail and critique the district's study plan. Monday's meeting was the first of four planned gatherings of the committee between now and April, with more sessions possible as spring and summer water tests are conducted. Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times Would you http://www.latimes.com/egi-bin/print.cgi 02/05/2001 LA Times Page 1 of Make Two Months' Sulmy Look Like Six �—azr res Homo I She Map I Amhivas I print Edihon I Discussions I Adverse I Feedback I Help Neva Business Sao m htWhA .lotlmes.com/editions/orange/20010204/t000010560.henl Politics Travel Cammentm Entertainment Classifieds Sh000lna motile,mo ,a6. lob-,homes, Back to story Tv,restaulant6 f$R re`tel9 Sunday, February 4, 2001 Our Shoreline Is Worth Protecting The 42-mile coastline is Orange County's most priceless natural asset, far too valuable and irreplaceable to allow environmental assaults on it to go unchecked. But for years,from Seal Beach to the South County shore,the oceanfront has been awash in pollution from urban runoff,aging sewage systems and other sources still being sought in various studies. The new year has introduced several new issues. One is a proposal to enact stricter urban runoff regulations on new developments. Another is are uest to double the capacity of a Huntington Beach power plant. Both bring added coastline controversies. Urban runoff has been identified as the primary source of contamination of the shoreline. The mix of toxic pesticides,oil,metals,animal waste and other pollutants flow into storm drains,creeks,rivers and ultimately into the ocean. In a growing urban area like Orange County,more development has meant more pollution,more beach closings and more threats,not only to the health of swimmers and surfers but to the community's economy and recreational and tourist industries. To stem the growth of pollution, state water officials are looking at new, tough standards for Orange County similar to the ones adopted in Los Angeles last year that will require developers to filter pollution from rainstorm runoff to keep it from reaching the ocean. It's a reasonable approach given the years of pollution that development has deposited onto our fragile coastline. It is true,as builders claim,that the tougher standards will add to building costs and do nothing about existing sources of pollution. But the new regulations will at least stop developments from making the problem increasingly worse. And the expense, 1%to 2%of a projeefs cost,is an acceptable price to pay for reducing the pollution that should have been controlled long ago. The push for state legislation by AES Corp.,California's largest private power generator,to allow it to begin retrofitting two boilers in Huntington Beach out of service since 1995 before getting final state permit approval is also tied to the county's offshore pollution problem. Given today's critical shortage of electricity, it might be tempting to buy the power company's argument that it's willing to gamble the estimated$145 million it will take to get the boilers on line by June so it can add 450 megawatts of power to its production.That,however,could be a big mistake. Aside from any local concerns about the company's commitment to environmental protection,AES paid a record$17-million fine last year for failing to control air pollution at its Long Beach plant. The Huntington Beach facility is http://www.latimes.00m/egi-bintprint.cgi 02/05/2001 LA Times Page 1 of 1 f `fir Overdeliver, underspend. F-nAnW Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise 1 Feedback I Help News Business Sports htlp:lhv .latimes.wmleditions/orange/20010204/1000010550.h"I Politics Travel Commentsry Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music.movie „a_n, lobs,homes, Back to sto N,restaurantse rBLs, a,is Sunday, Febmary 4, 2001 Rain, Ocean Patterns Postpone Testing for Pollutants Until May By SEEMA MEHTA The Orange County Sanitation District has called off winter ocean water testing off Huntington Beach because of recent rainfall and seasonal changes in the ocean. The testing, which will resume in May, will evaluate whether partially treated sewage from the district's outfall pipe four miles offshore is making its way back to the coast. The theory was put forth by UC Irvine researchers trying to explain high bacteria counts that have plagued much of Huntington Beach the last two summers. The scientists suspect that tidal forces and warm water released by a nearby power plant are drawing the bacteria-laden sewage toward shore. The testing is being delayed because the results would have been contaminated by recent rainfall that pushed massive amounts of toxic urban runoff into the ocean. Ocean stratification also differs seasonally, so researchers would not be studying ocean conditions similar to the summer,when the bacteria counts rose. But the delay won't affect the results,district spokeswoman Lisa Lawson said. Because the initial testing was intended to be a"trial run,this just gives us fewer trial runs," she said. Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times Would you like to http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/05/2001 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings IF—Name of Paper Sect Page # Date Subject ion Los Angeles Times _r a "Za ( Lam,,; c9�.DL;. t Sanitation district gathers input on water contamination ■Experts theorize that The meeting brought from the Talbert Marsh, and lion is part of the contamina- doubt on the subject, but a together about 45 experts to when runoff. Uon problem, and if so, do "no" answer would not. Huntington Beach's form a technical advisory "We are thrilled that everything we can to solve "Regardless of what the AES Corp. water committee to help the district everybody we hoped would and control it." source is, we're looking to test a theory that its waste attend did," said Lisa But some committee mem- find that," he said. cooling system interacts water plume from an curtail Lawson,the district's spokes- ben thought the study may Committee members With district's Waste pipe may interact with an woman. "Now we have a set need a broader scope. formed three groups ocean water cooling system group of experts that who Vic Liepzig, a former Monday, one to study the water outfall. used by the ASS Corp. we'll be able to reach out to Huntington Beach mayor long-term objectives of power plant in Huntington for Input and comment on and executive director of the ocean testing, a second to Tariq Malik Beach. This correlation may our study." environmental group Orange review how the county's INDEPENDENT draw sewage shoreward,and Han Tan,an engineer with Coast Watch, said focusing watershed could be affected, therefore be one of reasons ASS,said he appreciated the on the relationship between and a final group to go over FOUNTAIN VALLEY — for water contamination and lead taken by the sanitation ASS and district as the possi- the UC Irvine hypothesis in Oceanographers, environ. beach closures. district to get to the bottom of ble cause to beach bacteria detail and critique the dis- mentalists and microbiolo- In addition to representa- this matter. contamination may be a mis- trict's study plan. gists packed the control cen- lives from environmental "I think this was a very take. Monday's meeting was ter auditorium at the Orange groups, regulatory agencies productive meeting, and "It doesn't do the district the first of four planned gath- County Sanitation District's and other coastal officials, we'll continue to work close- any good to just address that erings of the committee waste water plant on Ellis the committee included UC ly with the sanitation district question," he said, adding between now and April, with Avenue on Monday to Irvine scientists who put on this matter," Tan said. that a "yes' answer would more sessions possible as review ocean water tests for forth the theory as a possible "We want to be able to deter- comfort some members of spring and summer water spring and summer. cause, as well as bird waste mine whether the power sta- the public, putting to rest the tests are conducted.. Surfers are certain,but the science isn't there yet Pagel of 2 allscience technology Home age m �r o rvglstercons THEORANGECOUNrYREGISTER iABOUTUS1 SEARCH 'QO AIL t„ 8 Great Games I HOMEPAGE So Ned V TODAY'S NEWS ;Cu RI ♦- S78 - �� ADVERTISING IM'• ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE science BUSINESS a FINANCE OCJOBFINDER CLASSIFIEDS COLUMNS Surfers are certain, but the science COMMUNITY NEWS CRIME,COURTS A LAW isn't there yet EDUCATION ENTERTAINMENT FUN a GAMES February 6, 2001 HEALTH a FITNESS LIVING a SHOPPING OPINION By MAYRAV SAAR POLITICS a The Orange County Register Related story: GOVERNMENT • Next oollutlon frontier: REAL ESTATE SCIENCE a vinuseS Swimming in polluted water causes TECHNOLOGY Mom Headliner every manner of unpleasantness from •Today's stones earaches to diarrhea, or so goes the conventional surfer aeon oake I Nauremral ff wisdom. -Our Universe our :Sea Mew The link between polluted ocean water and illness is so a mnoi q➢s`Oompmms ingrained in California beach culture as to seem irrefutable. SERVICEPROMOTS ONS SPORTS 6 RECREATION But before epidemiologists can definitively link the gunk in TRAVEL WEATHER the water to the gunk in surfers'chests and noses,researchers will have to figure out how to separate water exposure from all the other factors that could get a person sick. "Maybe they went surfing, but they also ate out and were around other people," said county epidemiologist Dr. Hildy Meyers. Surfers and some doctors point to a 1995 Santa Monica study that linked urban runoff in the ocean with illness in swimmers. But the study relied on a survey, not medical examinations. "There are no scientific studies supporting that the complaints surfers have are from the water they're in," said Douglas Moore, laboratory director of the Orange County Public Health lab. "However, it would be good to have further studies." But surfers and a small number of doctors say it should be taken as fact that urban runoff causes illness. "That's one of the mantras: There isn't any proof that(urban runoff)causes any harm. It's an agency trying to duck its responsiblity," said Dr. Gordon LaBedz,a family physician at Kaiser Hospital in Los Angeles and a leader in the Surfrider http://www.ocregister.com/science/virusOsO2O6cci.shtmi 0 210 6/20 0 1 Surfers are certain,but the science isn't there yet Page 2 of 2 Foundation. "Then there's a subgroup of scientists that love research. At some point you have to say let's use the money to clean up the water and not search for the smoking gun." Of course,it would be better if there were no bacteria and viruses to clean up, said Seal Beach surfer Ray Ranada,22. "A lot of(the pollution)comes from the inland cities, in the storm drains. It's human nature not to care about it if you're not in the water," Ranada said. ftVe armour an without it CW09M 200 The Orange County Register Please send comments to ecrenislarati kheedem.wm http://www.ocregister.com/science/virusOsO2O6cci.shtmi 02/06/2001 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper I Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register ocaQ j/ CAUSES OF SEWAGE SPILLS, 1997-2000 y ksh&ad� '�q o4rh, Roots:Tree roots • ~ sometimes intrude ` through sewer or • m, joints in sewer lines cyan and cause blockages. � %�'� ■ Grease:Mostly from A local restaurants,k builds up and blocks sewer lines Pipe defacls i *Contractor•rtM: Sewer lines may be installed incomeRly. ?9 The Orange county Register LA Times Pagel of 3 Rnd a Beetle '•11A1C Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports hill://www tatimes.rnm/news/state/20010203/t000010140.htmt Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping mus¢.movies,art, lobs,homes. Back to story TV. restaurants cars,rentals Saturday, February 3, 2001 Water Officials Warn of Possible 80% Cutbacks m Dry year: The Sierra snowpack is half of what's desirable, though no one is willing to cry 'drought.' By JOHN JOHNSON,Times Staff Writer State water officials are warning of dramatic cuts--perhaps 80%--in deliveries to farms and urban centers this year, though nobody is yet using the dreaded word "drought" to characterize what authorities call a"critically dry year." The Sierra snowpack is "about half where we'd like it," said one official after measuring it Friday. Even though there are three months left in the rainy season, experts say it is unlikely that normal rainfall levels will be reached. "Meteorologists indicate to us there is a one in 10 possibility of a normal winter," said Jeff Cohen of the state Department of Water Resources. If the water supply doesn't grow, cuts in state water supplies to some regions could be as severe as, or even exceed, those imposed during the last drought. If water shortages do occur, they will exacerbate the state's energy crisis, experts say. Farmers receiving less water from the state and federal government will be forced to increase ground water pumping, draining already stressed energy supplies. On Wednesday,the state Department of Water Resources announced it might have to curtail deliveries as much as 80%to its 29 agency customers. They range from Butte and Plumas counties in the north and the Central Valley through Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and to the desert in Palmdale and Antelope Valley. Water from the State Water Project meets part of the needs of 20 million people and helps irrigate 600,000 acres of farmland. The warning was more dire than an earlier estimate that deliveries might be cut 60%. On Friday,the state completed the second of five snow surveys in the Sierra,where much of the water in Southern California originates. The news was no better, said the Department of Water Resources'Jeff Cohen, after visiting the Echo Summit measuring station. Having weathered a severe drought less than a decade ago, California is better prepared to deal with water supply problems than it was the electricity shortage. After the drought of 1987-92, agencies around the state implemented a broad hup://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/pfnt.cgi 02/07/2001 LA Times Page 2 of 3 range of conservation and storage strategies. From low-flush toilets to ground water"banking," or storage,and new reservoirs, "We have many more tools at our disposal," said Bob Muir,a spokesman for the MWD. The MWD's new 4,500-acre Diamond Valley Lake reservoir in Riverside County is capable of storing 800,000 acre-feet of water. It is already half-full. MWD General Manager Ronald R.Gastelum said that,despite any supply cutbacks,the Los Angeles water agency"will provide its region with a reliable and dependable water supply through this year and the foreseeable future." At the height of the last drought,in the winter of 1991, the state cut off water to farmers and met only 30%of urban needs. If today's conditions get no better, the 2001 cutbacks could be even more severe for urban users. "It's serious," said Ted Thomas,a spokesman for the Department of Water Resources. "On a historical basis,it ranks pretty high." "If it comes true, it will be the lowest [allotment] urban contractors ever got," said John Coburn,a spokesman for the State Water Contractors, which represents 27 of the state's 29 main customers. One of the state's largest agricultural customers is the Kern County Water Agency in Bakersfield,which supplies water to as much as 400,000 acres of farmland. An 80% cut would be"pretty drastic," said Don Marquez, a senior engineer for the agency. But he said farmers also learned their lesson in the last drought and have invested heavily in ground water banking. At the moment,the district has 1 million acre-feet stored in the ground. Increased ground water pumping has its own problems,primarily because it uses a lot of energy, and the state is expected to be short of power again this summer. "We're still optimistic"that more rain will fall and deliveries will increase, Marquez said. "But what concerns us is the size of the cut in the first dry year." More Restrictions on Shipping Water In the last drought,drastic water cutbacks weren't imposed until several years into it. Farming experts say what's different now is that the increased population is using more water,and there are more restrictions on how much water can be shipped because of environmental and wildlife restoration efforts. The other big source of water shipments in California is the federal Bureau of Reclamation,which operates the massive Central Valley Project,supplying irrigation water to 20,000 farms. That water supplier is also planning big cuts-- 65%to 80%—said Jeff McCracken,a spokesman for the bureau. "This is a critically dry year right now," he said. Also tightening the valve on federal water deliveries is a"whole slew of environmental obligations added in the last eight years," he said. To restore wildlife in the Sacramento Delta,there are severe restrictions on how much water can be taken from there. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has a diversified supply of water sources from which to draw in times of shortage. It gets about a third of its water from the state,a third from the Colorado River and a third from a variety of other sources, including ground water basins,said MIND spokesman Muir. Despite all the talk of cutbacks,state and federal water officials said there is http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bintprint.egi 02/07/2001 LA Times Page 3 of 3 no reason for alarm. "It's very early in the year," said Muir. "There are some very important water months ahead." WWW Sierra Snowpack Statewide average Snowpack as percentage of normal on Feb. 1, from 1992 through present: 1992: 45% 1993: 175% 1994: 50% 1995: 195% 1996: 90% 1997: 155% 1998: 115% 1999: 100% 2000: 70% 2001: 60% Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/07/2001 Serious water shortage facing California, researchers warn Page 1 of 4 I For any occasion, make wishes come true... Click to purchase Amex Gift Cheques! Quick Find Search The Web -For F_ SEARCH News Horne Too News World Business Sports Entertainment Tech Odd More Oddly Enouoh•t1-Wire Serious water shortage facing California, researchers warn Updated 12:00 PM ET February 7, 2001 By Bernice Ng Daily Californian U. California-Berkeley (U-WIRE) BERKELEY, Calif. -- Energy may not be the only utility Californians should be worried about, warn University of Califomia-Berkeley scientists who sugggest that the state could be on the verge of an impending water shortage. According to predictions by researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the continual global warming associated with increasing atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide may leave the state of California with serious water problems over the next 50 years. Using regional climate models based on a numerical model simulations of the earth system, scientists found that by the year 2049, the overall warming of the western region of the United States may cause water to become a scarcity. "Climate projection have a large amount of uncertainty, but if this projection turned out to be true, then we may find California with increased winter storms and floods, warmer winters and hotter summers," said Norman Miller, an LBNL scientist. "There may be less water from the northern Sierra Nevada for agriculture and other summer time needs" Increased atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide are a result of the burning of fossil fuels caused by human activities such as power generation, driving automobiles, heating and industrial production. Elevated levels of the gas contribute to warmer overall temperatures and climate changes that affect the frequency and type of precipitation in affected regions. "We may see increases in winter flooding and short water supply for the summer," said LBNL researcher Jinwon Kim. 'There are other environmental and agricultural impacts associated with it." hftp://news.excite.com/news/uw/010208/university-284?pri ntstory=l 02/08/2001 Serious water shortage facing California, researchers warn Page 2 of 4 According to Miller and Kim, if carbon dioxide levels continue to rise at the rate of 1 percent per year, the climate in western United States may consist of more rain and less snow-- a combination that could lead to major water shortages during the warm season. Snow is important because it acts as a storage system during the cold months and as a source of runoff water during the spring and summer when California typically receives little to no precipitation. Higher temperatures resulting from global warming acts to decrease the amount of snow. "Increases in the low atmospheric temperature raises the freezing level, reducing the amount of snowfall on the ground," Kim said. "Increased temperature also accelerates melting of snow. Combined, these effects generally reduce the amount of snow in the elevation range between one and two kilometers. Increased snow accumulation occurs only in very high elevation where, despite the warming, near- surface temperature remains below freezing" Whereas excess snow can serve as a water source later, increased rainfall could lead to flooding and may contribute to water shortage. "The western United States region heavily relies on snow accumulation for water supply from the late spring to early fall," Kim said. 'The projected effects show that there will be significant increase of winter rainfall while snowfall decreases due to the projected increase in low-atmospheric temperature. As a result, even though winter rainfall increases substantially, the amount of snow decreases. Unless more reservoirs are built to store increased winter time runoff, there will be a water shortage during the dry season. Building more reservoirs requires careful consideration on environment, in addition to the cost" The high levels of water after intense rainfall cannot be saved for later use, Miller said. "The potential for increased winter precipitation under warming future scenarios implies that snow storage that is usually available during the dry summer months may not be available," Miller said. "If there is an increase in heavy winter storms, then reservoirs will release water to protect their structural integrity when large amounts of runoff enter reservoirs. This potential increase of wintertime storms also suggests potential flood increases and decreased storage." Although the findings are only projections and may contain uncertainties, the research can still help Californians realize that fossil fuel burning has a very significant impact on the climate. "The main goal of this paper is to report an estimated effects of increased carbon dioxide on the hydrologic cycle of the western United States," Kim said. 'I believe the projections in this study is plausible, at least qualitatively. There have been plenty of warning in recent years about the potential impacts of human-induced climate change" http://news.excite.com/news/uw/010208/university-284?pri ntstory=l 02/08/2001 Serious water shortage facing California, researchers warn Page 3 of 4 The findings should serve as a warning to California residents, who may not realize that the current abundance of water could soon be a luxury of the past, Miller said. "There have been numerous reports and public oriented articles that serve as quasi- wake-up calls," Miller said. "This is not a doomsday report, but a scientific study of the potential impacts of increased greenhouse gasses and natural stressors on our already strained system. More often than not, It requires a crisis for society to wake up.-- Currently, California is experiencing a period of above average precipitation, but residents need to be aware that it could be entering a period of dryness. "The public tends to forget these natural oscillations and maintain a short-term memory assuming an unlimited water supply," Miller said. "Educating the public and policy makers in a scientifically objective and understandable way will help to increase water and energy conservation and perhaps bring legislation that will increase efficiency." In response to their projections, Miller said that there is no fast way to halt the problem. "There is no quick fix to a potential water shortage," Miller said. "Land use change, increasing population, and other factors will continue to stress this system." To combat global warming is a difficult and large endeavor because reducing carbon dioxide levels requires action on large levels, scientists said. They did, however, suggest actions that people can take to help stabilize levels. Increasing levels of earth-warming gas can be combated by driving smaller cars, consuming less energy, and conserving energy use, researchers said. "Decreasing carbon dioxide levels is not an easy task," Kim said. "Carbon sequestration has become one of a leading projects at the (Department of Energy). The best way is to reduce emission. Since reducing emission requires conservation, it also has large effects on industrial activities and economy." The work is part of a series of studies and Miller pointed out that it is important to mention that many uncertainties exist. "The (model)that we used was one of several that give different results," he said. "There needs to be more research with longer climate simulations using a larger number of models. The paper I presented focused more on uncertainty than just a result. We need to tell the public that there are possible outcomes and this represents only one." For the future, both scientists plan to continue to expand their climate research by simulating other climate scenarios and critically analyzing the uncertainty for a number of past and future time periods. hftp://news.excite.com/newsluw/010208/u n ivers ity-284?printstory=1 02/08/2001 Serious water shortage facing California, researchers warn Page 4 of 4 "My continued research topic is to better understand dynamical and physical processes in the atmosphere and land surface, especially precipitation physics, vegetation effects, soil moisture, and improving model formulation to improve the quality of simulations," Kim said. (C) 2001 Daily Californian via U-W IRE W001 At Home Corporation.All rights reserved.Excite,@Home.and We Excite and®Homo logos are service marks or registered service marks of At Homo in the U.S.and other countries.Qjggla me f I Privacy Policy Submit a Site I Advertise on Excite I Jobs@Excite I Press Releases I Investor Relations I General Excite Help http://news.excite.com/news/uw/010208/university-284?printstory=l 02/08/2001 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Plan for wastewater is a big first step an,beast,and plant have been sharing the earth N a - -. complex bi- ologically symbiotic relation- ship for millions of years now, and for the most part it has worked out pretty well. For the last decade,howev- er,a mere blink in the Bill Borden ever-watchful eyes of Mother AS I BEE rr Earth, man hes upset this del- icate balance through over consumption and improper are,are separated out and disposition of water-the crit- treated using on icel element in the entire Finally the microscopic mate, process. rial resulting from this proc- A burgeoning population, us is removed from the using more and more water, wastewater.has placed our resources un- The end product of this der a critical strain and the tl¢estep process is called disposition of wastewater,cre- ;treated wastewater."The San- ated by this over consump- station District has been dic- tion,has very possibly jeopar- charging this"treated waste- dized the quality of our ocean water"4I/2 miles out into the water. ocean.Extensive testing and Right now when we flush a years of monitoring the out- toilet or dispose of potato Row led the sanitation district peels in the disposal,the un- to believe that this process treated sewage is whisked was a safe and responsible away,through a complex sys- method of disposing of two of naves of sewers to the "treated wastewater." Orange County Sanitation Dis- A November study by Utd- trict's sewage treatment plant versity of California,Irvine on the banks of the Santa Ana scientists,however,has cre- River. ated serious doubt as to the The first step in treating safety of this discharge.The this mess is to filter out for- study indicates that the AES eign objects,from hairpins to power plant,which pulls mil- bowling balls.Next organic solids,you know what they Please see BOR- DEN/Page 12 Orange County Sanitation Districts t Newspaper Clippings ('e, lrt' j N me of Paper Section Pa9 # Date ) Subject BORDEN ono gimpuzzlee o `h ba reasonably epman-m dde is a attempt lem is smentificaily deemed at replicating the very in- From page 6 and expeditiously solved tricate system that Mother —one example of their dill- Earth invented in the first lions of gallons of ocean water eoce m Ng place to recycle our precious into its facility,may be cre- roun Water a water supply. sting a condition that pulls the stem.Bas y this system As a result of the over- 'Yreated wastewater"peril- wool takethe"treated waste- whelming passage of the State ously close to our beachea. water'now being discharged Water Bond Proposition,the The Sanitation District into the ocean,and put it Groundwater Replenishment points out that the study did through a reverse osmosis, System will realize$37 million not actually show that any of mimnfiltration and ultraviolet with which to implement this the discharge reached the disinfection process before plan Even though the cost beach,but a senior scientist piping it up to the spreading will be much greater than there did allow that'it was a basins in Anaheim,.where it this,we must get on with it little closer than we've seen would percolate naturally into The cost of doing nothing is before." the groundwater basin This far greater. In ew the sanitation process could solve two crit- dn Mct was een� res oma a ical problems created by Bill Borden's As I See it column an eat at writingt overconsumption and ques- is a regular teaaue of The Wave. waz a so u�hon to our ocean tionable wastewater disposi- You can e-mail Bill at WIBor- water pro�we can count tion. den®aol.com �OARD C.ET792� LAw OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN& SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPOMTION 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET.SUITE SOW B ORANGE,CA 928684760 R(714)358.7000 R FAx(714)935-7787 DIRECT DIAL: (714)SU-2605 DIRECT FAX: (714)505.2605 EASAIL: TU04OMS-1AW.COM February 12, 2001 Peter D. Moock, Esq. Assistant County Counsel Kings County Government Center Hanford, CA 93230 Re: Issues Re Regulation of Land Application of Biosolids Dear Peter: As a follow up to our recent conversations, to assist you in evaluating the points represented and asserted by our client the Orange County Sanitation District, I am forwarding herewith three documents: 1. November 21, 1995, Notice of Intent to Comply with General Order No. 95-140 together with a copy of that order; 2. Appraisal of the Sheen Magan Property, this is Dairy Ranch North, dated July 20, 1999; and 3. Assignment of Discharge Permit. As we have indicated to you, the Sanitation District was looking to establish its long-tens plans for beneficial reuse of its biosolids and considered many alternative possibilities. It was ultimately agreed and decided upon to purchase the Dairy Ranch North Property consisting of 1,808.15 acres from Mr. Magan for several compelling reasons, most notably that the site was already permitted by California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Central Valley for the land application of the biosolids on this site. Secondly, Mr. Magan was a known qualified, experienced applicator who had provided this service on a contractual basis to the District for several years in strict accordance with District requirements and general regulatory requirements. Lastly, we are able to assure ourselves that we could continue to utilize Mr. Magan's company for services of the biosolids application under the existing permit. TERRYC.ANDRU5 BSIFPSRMI.BMI •M,U BOMK•MMECAVANAUGHBCMIGG.FARRMMN IOSEPH W.fORBAIN BM.M0.HOOMRDOUGLASC.IgLIANDR1.015E.IFJF •MAG.CR LOXA-WMON JUOEMSLOSKEY•Tk SM TNDION•NMK.ERESNRT(ROMA0.5ANDOVAL•IONNRSHAW•GRMU E.SIMONIAN KFNNARDR SMART.I0.•DAND2.K.SPRAOLM•LAUM A.UNDFAWOOD w TNOMAS L.WOODRUW Peter D. Moock, Esq. Re: Issues Re Reaulation of Land Application of Biosolids February 12, 2001 Page 2 For the above reasons, we chose the alternative of purchasing the Dairy Ranch North Property. We recognized that the value of the land had been appraised at$600 per acre, but after a series of offers and counter offers we ultimately agreed to a purchase price of$1,800 per acre, reflecting the District's valuation of the important discharge and application approval and permit. It is the District's opinion that the recently enacted King's County Ordinance by the total ban on Class B biosolids within two years, and Class A biosolids within five years, has significantly impaired the contracts and purchase agreements that the District entered into with Mr. Magan, resulting in a huge financial loss to the District. Clearly, the District relied in good faith upon the negotiations and the interchange between County representatives and the District representatives over a period of many months that would have led to the enactment of an ordinance protecting the District's investment in Mr. Magan's property. Now that the final form of ordinance has had substantive changes which resulted in the District losing the benefit of its bargain, we are confronted with not only the economic losses relative to the land acquisition, but continuing losses for a number of years in the future to seek ultimate sites or process methodologies. We appreciate you advising us that the Board of Supervisors is somewhat understanding of the District's concerns relative to the ordinance and hopefully the enclosed materials will be of value to you. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A Professional Corporation HOMAS L. WOODRUFF TLW:Iam Enclosures cc: %Brake P. Anderson Robert P. Ghirelli Michael M. Moore Layne Baroldi 132486\1 h&W-0091 Of ullm FrorE.Y.1f.D. UUMITT T-261 P-081/001 HTO . .liN.: . gl.:�etlaey7r2001 C?I�$?�. '•• . . •<: °3�9oa4$ 18.kw* ;i, .aaoriLiiDaDaw�c[,ef4he- .. ,.,: . .. : com totis of ratvSuitB t[eatIDen4 K 9uPP1Y the Y•• '. ..;. .;.., .:;sb!WyI4&irpr&mssed into oI' Ne�fif{;IIf�sflnEe grodactm need to fen .- _. „g.. .. ' asN�C�'.-r cj�4L odor Fe+Toeated their ' .rrr,;:.,. .,a:.,!:,:? �..'.-:'•.4 ' .`{yo�iotdd gp,pss our fcoa. `ii= ; �9ClVkk• i-breivtWbf m,tYadodAtL,iYese people.$yne-: vbas"5lmost IIke a•bsehM bt giq'thaktNe odottaas y sbtn- �ac for DA"Sclitamin, Tene'dAvIr waS burning our ar-oednneffciaily TUes- e9es.Suraeng our noses, hmM dwifiat*e add her,Temescai mg our throats.It was-so ftirs-' (�q}on peigJrbon have W"W-`. vaddg,"she said."TJtey just .eitHy,prevelled ia,tbeit;]ega1 didn't seem to tare abotii tta" . bfiQb against a korapostipg After years of complaining- . WiAA'nte sled 37 irmfim to the iotmti and Syoagm offs- .victual sm claims iaWsidts; ,:etals;ScbYauo:*d, she'and agafnst.Synagru Tact oo 'gies., .tic neigbbors finally ran out Lrr:.for.55,0110 earh;;rbe ward- ofPadenee..i,ast summer,they mt®,alluivable.amgnnt,:rL 9— 'began doing ta catch.in the ing.[he cotapatgrwith'cieaQ.. .law library dowotowx�and, a,publicnmsmcer., 'based avAe dohniticurof at A.'cl-erfcoat .the Riverside- .-qublic nuisaoce,,decided:they'- CouatySuperior CWrt m Cwa'- . probably bdd a ase.•lbgmhe5, m Vft dechxd40beidentified:, theyhelped.each oomple the cmfiincd the 97 cases were set necessary:paperworl, co ea tled,'akhougl`t u0 ofluie6hotias-- themoaey'forfpngfeesbad . hevN-fiei"ft,seatyeti'.'.. fikd.ihbir"urdivldual wdta:; "AD tth -Plaintiffs.hadewou The'�'udge heard their<aees.. their'bases,"6e ep:d.."Spolts ..during'@'threedaY Petfod.be- Hice they' dW.anW=they� ginning Dec:•12J'art of the`ev- asked tor. :: .:adenne'.'preeeated -again _ A'delfghted Schramm said,: .Synggro included docuweuta- 'It`s juatab 4paro maa that the tiwr fixer the County Emiron- cotitts vurlf:The odor"tor the. 'meotal'Hoalta IY.Eparintent's lest ll:yars,'.¢as been like an.. •actor,patrol"which jddoitms opeameptmtadi:lalat4whatit .' fout:aliot.rhmp]eiuts.; ` . .would meMike,and it was in. . . sufferable. CoiimitateNAtite.alpweplgpq R'esideents.am�aedbynagm, (00318T8s315,5t-2M.'oc oF�ereatiu�a,amsence with-the :.adlggg@atn:'., .. - .. S44-.. .. ._ . . ._ LA Times Pagel of 3 a. Complete your Bachelor's degree at Pepperdine lteel:d: Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports http://www.latimes.com/communities/news/pomona valleyl2OOlO2l4/tivool Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music.movies,art, lobs.homes. Back to Storrs W.restaurants cars,rentals Wednesday, February 14, 2001 News from Chino Hills in the Times Community Newspapers City officials vow to continue fight against composting plant ■Chino Hills mayor asks residents to remain active in opposition to facility proposed for site near Fairfield Ranch neighborhood. By DAVID HERMANN,DAVID.HERMANN®LATIMES.COM CHINO HILLS -- In a show of solidarity between officials and residents of the Fairfield Ranch neighborhood,the City Council on Tuesday directed City Manager Doug La Belle,the city attorney and other members of the staff to continue fighting any plan that would build a large composter near the city's border. "I would encourage all of you in Fairfield Ranch to stay involved as you have been," Mayor Ed Graham said. "We have a great political difference about what is going to happen here." Graham and the rest of the council were reacting to an Inland Empire Utility Agency proposal to build a plant that would turn tons of cow manure, green waste and sewer sludge from the Chino Basin into fertilizer within a half mile of several hundred homes and a $12-million sports park that the city is building in the area. Residents of those homes worry that bad odors, insects attracted by those odors and dust will emanate from the composter,depressing property values and posing a potential health hazard. They came to Tuesday night's meeting looking for answers and asking for help. "If you walk out my front door 10 feet and look to the left it's right there," resident Scott Arington said, referring to one of the proposed composter sites. "Why would they want to put it this close?" The city has hired two consultants to review everything that the agency is doing related to the composter. Tuesday night, the consultants told the council and the residents that the agency's process for selecting a site is seriously flawed. One consultant said the agency sacrificed environmental concerns, including the presence of golden eagles and other federally protected species on two of the proposed sites, to save money. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/16/2001 LA Times Page 2 of 3 ,Agency CEO Richard Atwater sent La Belle a letter addressing some of the city's concerns, including questions about where the agency wants to put the composter. In the letter, Atwater told La Belle that one site will not be enough to treat the I million tons of cow manure,50,000 tons of green waste and 60,000 tons of sewage sludge that the Chino Basin produces each year. "Two facilities are currently recommended to be developed," the letter states. The first would be an open or semi-open composting facility to treat cow manure that would be built at a site outside the agency's service area, possibly in Colton. The letter states that a second proposed composter would be fully enclosed and treat manure,green waste and sewer sludge near one of two agency sewage treatment plants, one of which is being built on the Chino/Chino Hills border near the Fairfield Ranch neighborhood. That plant,called RP-5, is being built at a cost of$85 million and agency officials believe it makes sense to put the composter next door to the place where the sewage that it is processing is produced. "We want to clean up the air and water pollution and minimize the truck traffic impacts throughout the area," Atwater said Tuesday. "If we cant do that, then we're not doing a very good job of meeting the needs of the more than 700,000 people we serve." A timeline attached to Atwaters letter shows that agency board approval of plans for the composlers is not scheduled to happen until June. Atwater says that the enclosed composters and sewage treatment plants that the agency builds could help alleviate the energy crisis by capturing the methane gas that is a natural byproduct of waste and converting it into an environmentally friendly source of energy. "We better figure out a way to deal with our waste products in an environmentally responsible way," Atwater said. "They want us to emphasize export. But I don't think that's a viable solution just saying you're going to put it in somebody else's backyard." Atwater said any composter that the agency builds near Chino Hills would be nothing like the agency's current Co-Composting Facility in Chino near the California Institution for Women, where open rows of manure and compost contribute to the area's odor, fly and dust problems. "We expect wherever we site it we are not going to be a nuisance problem," Atwater said. "We are going to guarantee that dust and odor will not be a problem. We may not bat a thousand,but 99%of the time we better be doing a good job. If we can't do that we shouldn't do anything. We want to assure everybody that whatever we do will be safe." But despite Atwater's assurances,the residents who live within sight of one of the agency's preferred sites for a composter will take some more convincing. Arington,who moved into Fairfield Ranch in April, said he would be willing to pay higher sewer rates to get the agency to do the composting somewhere else. "I could care less about the cost," he said. "Just get the smell away." Copyright ram Los Angeles Tines http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/16/2001 LA Times Page 1 of 3 �A oi14 :11.110I: Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I feedback i Help News Business Sports http://www.tatimes.com/communities/newstpomona_valley/20010213/tivOOl Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping musm,movies, It. Jobs.homes, Back to story W.restaurants cars.rentals Tuesday,February 13,2001 News from Chino Hills in the Times Community Newspapers Chino Hills braces for composting fight n Tonight's meeting will feature city's objections to facility proposed for area next to residential neighborhood. By DAVID HERMANN.DAVID.HERMANN@L TIMES.COM CHINO HILLS -- Six days after a public workshop during which they angrily questioned Inland Empire Utilities Agency officials about a proposal to build a composter near their neighborhood, residents of Fairfield Ranch are expected to come to tonight's City Council meeting to hear about their city's efforts to oppose the project. "It's not just us saying we don't want this in our backyard," said resident Anne Elefante, who is planning to attend the meeting. "We're saying don't put it in anybody's backyard." Residents and officials in Chino Hills view the composter as a threat. The composter turns sewer sludge, green waste and manure from the Inland Valley's more than 200 dairies into fertilizer by adding wood chips to the waste materials and letting them biodegrade. They worry that the same bad smells,dust and flies that plague the agency's current Co-Composting Facility on Chino-Corona Road about five miles away in Chino might emanate from the new plant. Residents also are concerned it could lower property values in the area. Agency officials maintain that any composter built in the area would be fully enclosed,minimizing any aesthetic or health concerns associated with the current composter, which is being relocated to make way for residential development in the former San Bernardino County Dairy Preserve. Agency CEO Rich Atwater, who will be at tonight's meeting along with other agency representatives, has said that one of the most logical locations for a composter is next to a new$85-million fully enclosed sewage treatment plant under construction in the same area near El Prado Road and Kimball Avenue on the Chino/Chino Hills border. Atwater said he cannot guarantee that the new composter would not ever have any odor or dust problems. But by using air filters, landscaping and additional land as a buffer,the agency hopes to minimize the composter's effects. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/16/2001 LA Times Page 2 of 3 . "It may not be pristine,but it would certainly be a dramatic improvement over what we have there today," he said,explaining that a cow ranch and two open fertilizer bagging businesses now operate in the area. But those arguments have not convinced officials in Chino Hills,which is building a$12-million sports complex next to Fairfield Ranch. Mayor Ed Graham said that building an enclosed composter on the scale that the agency is contemplating is too risky an experiment to build near homes and ball fields. "It would affect those homeowners'property values and their quality of life," he said. "It would affect the business venture we have going there,too." Graham and the rest of the council will meet at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 2001 Grand Ave., to hear reports from two consultants hired by the city to review the agency's plans for the composter. "I think they're going to find some flaws in the studies coming out of IEUA," Graham said on Monday, declining to be more specific. Graham said the City Council will ask the city attorney to determine whether there are any laws that the city can use in its fight against the composter. "I think if we had some legal means to oppose it,we would use that,too," Graham said. Elefante supports the city's fight. The 34-year-old and her husband, Steve,moved into a home in Fairfield Ranch from the South Bay area of Los Angeles last June. Although the couple doesn't have any children yet, the Elefantes paid more than $200,000 for a home in Fairfield Ranch because they believed it was the kind of place where they could start and raise a family. When one of her neighbors told her the agency was considering building a 25- acre composting plant within a quarter-mile of the neighborhood, Elefante went into action. She has contacted officials from Sacramento to Seattle digging for everything she could learn about composting. Elefante said she learned that flying insects can transmit disease from human and animal waste if they have access to it and that ammonia, a natural byproduct of waste processing,can pose a problem for people with respiratory conditions. "I wanted to know if our fears were just emotionally based, so that's when I started to make my phone calls," she said. Elefante acknowledged the need for another composting plant in the region and that she and fellow Fairfield Ranch residents produce some of the waste that a composter would process and recycle. But she also believes that the agency needs to find a location that is far removed from homes,playgrounds and schools. "I eat steak, but I don't want to live next to the butcher," she said. "We don't want our neighborhood to be the sacrifice for the greater good." Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Turv; CLICK HERE SAVETP70°/a _ Atravelscapexom http://www.latimes.comlcgi-bin/print.cgi 02/16/2001 SignOn San Diego State/The Region--News in brief from the San Joaquin Valley Pagel of 2 Kaulman and BrwG is rary I �t � News in brief from the San Joaquin Valley ASSOCIATED PRESS February 14,2001 HANFORD—A farmer has filed a lawsuit against the Kings County board of supervisors over its ordinance restricting use of sewage sludge on farmland. Shaen Magan claims the county should have done an environmental review before it passed the ordinance banning certain types of sewage sludge from farmland. Magan fertilizes 1,800 acres of land with sludge trucked in from Orange County. According to his suit, imposing the ordinance,which allows only highly treated sludge on farmland, could further damage the environment. ' Treating sludge might mean building treatment plants that use energy at a time when energy is scarce, Magan asserts. And, it could require additional transportation to move the sludge,possibly increasing air pollution. Kings County officials said the ordinance is exempt from environmental review because the purpose of the ordinance is to protect the environment. The Orange County Sanitation District also may file a lawsuit against the county. Under the ordinance, it has only two more years to apply sludge that contains disease-causing microorganisms to the land it bought from Magan for$3.75 million. Several other counties in the San Joaquin Valley, including Kem and Tulare, also banned certain types of sludge. STOCKTON—A plan to preserve endangered species and open space and spur economic development in San Joaquin County is gamering strong local support. http://www.union-trib.com/news/state/20010214-0858-sanj oaquinva.html 02/16/2001 SignOn San Diego State/The Region--News in brief from the San Joaquin Valley Page 2 of 2 , The Habitat Conservation Plan, to be administered by the San Joaquin Council of Governments,would encompass the entire county if its seven cities approve the measure. So far, Escalon,Manteca, Lathrop and Tracy have voted in favor of the plan,and Ripon, Stockton and Lodi are expected to approve it within the next couple of weeks. The plan would streamline the permit process by creating overarching environmental guidelines. Projects would no longer have to be studied on a case-by-case basis. Also, the Council of Governments would purchase property for conservation. About 90 percent would be agricultural easements.The remaining 10 percent is likely to be property in flood plains or near vernal pools. The council hopes to buy 100,240 acres at a total cost of$263 million over the next 50 years.The money for the plan would come primarily from development fees and grants. MODESTO— Stanislaus County is pressing forward with a plan to pool dollars with cities for economic development projects. The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to set aside $1.5 million in the 2001-02 budget to jump-start the idea. The county plans to add the same amount each of the next five years. The plan will help towns come up with matching funds required for state or federal grants. The next step is to create a development bank board of directors that will work with the Stanislaus County Economic Development Corp. and the Workforce Investment Board to create a multiyear project list. County officials will meet with city managers to determine a structure for the bank,which could be set up as a nonprofit organization or as a joint-powers authority. Today's News I sports I Marketplace I Entertainment I visitor Info Home ©Copyright 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. http://www.union-trib.com/news/state/20010214-0858-sanjoaquinva.html 02/16/2001 Inland Empire Online-News Pagel of 3 a` WINDOWTINTING •"temotive metcia�- •curl e Residential mice oThe Pr Enter peseCompany,for Riverside and Be BemardmocountiesFriday, February 16, 2001 ""As udge concerns aired at forum Tedays headlines Residents grill Synagro official s.e._County DA i nd be srd9lGght Power-gnd buy by stale likely By Laurie Koch Threader Bonus money shod for Inland The Press-Enrerpnse teachers :LS?Lf&4J MENIFEE US.eyes.shitl_n Or$poliw ]%gi119 Lawyer gels prison in thefts Collapse of Ice Castls.used alguvaasar Residents from rural areas of Riverside County Probed ggaldav grilled a representative of a sewage sludge Kin' k'dds"f glrlipfoeer care alleged l?eaoiw supplier Tuesday night about the fertilizer the Former cavalryman looks 19J gJIT company provided for farmland that was found to back with finds ullao have illegally high levels of germs. - Newiudge soughll9rJais un C a'dEliian District anorn d to aid iuQ C. ilIMr• UI About 100 residents gathered at Callie Kirkpatrick pie ]IrZJA% cloudy skies,.nc�a_uo @_n Elementary School in Menifee to hear more about forecast for Inland weekend the sludge that is used to fertilize crops in the Drive aims.attaxcat -2iUdirin Winchester, French Valley and Menifee areas. Leplong(or"-We gth i,Far showAblin0m zatu r e] nonprofit groups Many residents say that the fertilizer is making District.doeaioyatpark arads them ill. . 1waBd mereiprt}han the Super Bowlwl Three arrested in Hemet —swam—, "I've never been so sick as this year in all my life;' meth�a3s said Menifee resident Lee Hesse. Aya.Lpn artud paiim memories Resldemg.Pretestwahahouse 1 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last plans year found that sludge spread over a 16-month Nelghbprhopd dean results in conviction period on thousands of acres of farmland in the March.cargo port rapped county contained illegally high levels of germs. Jury vines death jrfdmll f killer Religion scholar to discuss Also,an EPA inspector spotted children and dogs geneticsideres walking next to sludge-covered fields along Scott p Ih1_igg�oars ahead fyoung Road in the Menifee area. Mineokubo:sketched Japanese intent essiLtile - Lifeli f ba e are loyal The sludge supplier, Synagm. has promised to clients put up bigger signs warning the public to keep Landmark blaze fount b be arson away' Canyon Lake Twirlers dancinglartsquare Despite the violations, the actual risk to the public Learning from others' m stakes was slight,the EPA said. - ten Sou:d ;ff osel Unger frg - Detail o1 harder to be withheld Residents are not convinced. Lawmakers oppose prison halfaft th dd, l3SNP ch ersnlgesk. At the Menifee meeting , people in the audience bound volleyed question after question at Synagro 'Anneaationtalk splits Regional Vice President Brent McManigal about communi In—neon fhn lrnafnA um fro le fuef.A 1nr nnrme . C2lega£Pldn ragre http://www.inlandempireontine.com/news/stories/021401/sludge l4.shtml 02/16/2001 Inland Empire Online-News Page 2 of 3 s. apwaweera�nn2s and metals,who does the testing and how the Can—BgMg m cutredna case sludge gets to fields. PLIi.jerame s Check it out! The sludge came from an Orange County waste win tickets for z to The treatment plant,which paid Synagro to haul away British are Central treated sewage. McManigal told the crowd that a presented by the Inland 9 9 Empire I Riverside County waste treatment plant,not Synagro,produced the Phllhermo nic sludge that violated federal standards. - special section:Black 6le1ory-donth - Check out our new Family "We were as amazed as anyone was when we and Cpinlon sections got the call from the EPA and the waste treatment sm AnnualReaeer3.'_phai£e plant,"saying that the sludge did not meet federal Awards standards, he said. ZERO= pJlteraia'_s power crisis Several people asked repeatedly if Synagro paid , €acellonce In achievement farmers to accept sludge. Jerry Eaw Strawma at Riverside CIN ball—A miscreants e Farmer Andy Domenigoni,who uses sludge, . tbt_emst Alkat on Tate or stood up and said that he gets the sluff free. this bides McManigal said that Synagro pays the farms to till Marketplace the sludge into the soil. Names veer lam with PtepT3e. Take house-buyingtoa new Once applied to land,the sludge must be blended IexeJwim viduel home Mere. with dirt within 24 hours, McManigal said,which - says at local businesses wit brought cries of"Thais bull;from audience online couoonal 9 •Company P-st;of itched members who Insisted that dark muck Is allowed Ejram�p*Mjabdutaxalb, to rest on some fields for much longer. After spreading the sludge on familand, Synagro takes a sample and tests it for levels of various metals, but not for germs, McManigal said. Residents concemed about sludge have found allies in County residents who have fought other environmental battles. Tuesday's meeting was led by Penny Newman, head of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice.Newman headed the effort to get the cleanup of the Stringfellow acid pits, a toxic.waste dump in Glen Avon that contaminated water supplies. Residents who have been fighting Synagro's Temescal Canyon composting plant also spoke about sludge and their experiences with strong odors drifting into their neighborhoods from the plant. Laurie Koch Thrower can be reached by e-mail at Ithrowvv@pe_cm or by phone at(909) 248-6130. Published V144?001 Send comments to leedbecklibiniandempireonlirocom http://www.inlandempireonline.com/newststories/021401/sludge 14.shtml 02/16/2001 Menifee residents talk about sludge problem-NCTimes.net Pagel of 2 t •, i u r— Totlays Waathar Check The iiiiirisi!➢GIYYi� Forecast Prex ious Slury I leadlines 11 Vcxl Story Our Best Links Menifee residents talk about sludge What We Do J problem Keyword seereh JOSE L.SANCHEZ Jr. Search Staff Writer :%(IN anced MENIFEE----A meeting of 75 residents of this semi-rural area ended on Tuesday with a call to keep pursuing those responsible for dumping partly treated, disease-laden sewage on fields too close to homes,wells and streams. "The laws will not protect you.The laws are written by corporations and politicians," said Penny Newman, executive director of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, a Riverside-based organization. To get supervisors to end the county-sanctioned dumping of sludge known as Class B biosolids over 4,000 acres of western Riverside County,Newman recommended residents continue to call supervisors at their offices and homes to complain. Critics say the sludge contains viruses,bacteria and microorganisms which are dangerous to humans and animals. Putting the sludge on fields serves to fertilize them and at the same time provides an outlet for the output of waste treatment facilities. County health officials have said Class B biosolids----which are approved for use as a fertilizer by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency---- present a "negligible risk" and are more a"quality of life" than a health problem. One resident who begged to differ with that view was Doug Maupin, who lives on a 2.5- acre lot in Menifee. The sludge spreading trucks of the Temescal Canyon-based Synagro West Inc. are supposed to stay 500 feet from adjoining properties,but one day in August,one of the company's trucks splattered the foul-smelling black stuff some 50 feet onto his land, Maupin told the meeting. "My ceiling was black with flies. It was so disgusting," Maupin said. "My son got welts,my wife got sick, my mother got nosebleeds and nausea,"he said. At the beginning of the meeting, Newman put an empty chair on the dais of the meeting room at the Callie Kirkpatrick Elementary School with a sign on it that read"Reserved for Supervisor(Jim) Venable. She told the audience she had sent a letter inviting the supervisor to the meeting. http://www.nctimes.com/news/2001/20010214/zz.html 02/16/2001 Menifee residents talk about sludge problem-NCTimes.net Page 2 of 2 "There's a reason why Jim Venable is not here today.He doesn't want to hear this and deal with it," said Michael Lopez,of Winchester. A petition drive to stop the sludge dumping was launched at the meeting,with copies to be delivered to the Bard of Supervisors. For more information on the petition drive,call (909) 360-8451. Contact staff writer Jose L. Sanchez Jr.at(909)676-4315,Ext.2605, or at jsanchez@nctimes.com. 2/14/01 Pre%iuus Story 11 Headlines 11 Nest Story nebmastena neltmrs.com :1947 2ual Nonh Count,Times sditorlametimes.com http://www.nctimes.com/news/2001/20010214/z .htmi 02/16/2001 LA Times Page 1 of 1 Q R I by:„r Overdeliver, underspend. F- -n*.Im:i Home I Site Map I Amhives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports http:/Av .lafines.com/editions/orangel2001020711000011401.html Politics Travel Commenbry Entertainment Classifieds Shopping Back to story music,movies,art, L.homes, D,restaur nis cars.rentals Wednesday,February 7, 2001 Runoff Diversion Project OKd 9y DAVID REVES In an effort to control ocean contamination off Huntington Beach,county supervisors on Tuesday approved a year-round project that would divert urban runoff from the Santa Ana River and the Talbert watershed to a treatment facility during dry months. Urban runoff is the main source of contamination of Southern California's beaches. Beach waters near storm drains and rivers are polluted by bacteria, debris and chemicals. The county will install pumps to divert 95%of non-storm runoff flowing down the river and Talbert watershed into the waste treatment facilities of the Orange County Sanitation District. The district recently adopted a dry-weather policy to treat up to 4 million gallons of runoff daily at no charge. "We're currently receiving about 2 million gallons daily in runoff," said Blake Anderson, general manager of the agency,which is the county's largest waste treatment agency. During storms however,the agency will turn off pumps during peak flows. Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times Same room. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.egi 02/07/2001 43cAR S L4 iTte R— JAMES W. SILVA VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPERVISOR. SECOND DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA. P.O. BOX 687.SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702-0607 PHONE (714) 834 3220 FAX (714) 834.6109 February 6, 2001 Mr. Blake Anderson General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: Next Steps for Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed Dear Mr. An on, As you may know our respective staffs are continuing to work together on addressing bacterial contamination offshore of the Talbert-LSAR Watershed. The County of Orange is serving as the lead agency in this cooperative effort subject to our Memorandum of Understanding from last spring. The attached matrix provides you with an update of the most recent efforts. It outlines the major findings and recommendations from the studies performed during 2000 as well as the recommendations from the Blue Ribbon Panel. Alongside each recommendation is a brief description of the follow-up steps as they are currently conceived. The matrix is a working document subject to further refinement and development. A working group consisting of our three agencies, National Water Research Institute, Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, and Regional Water Quality Control Board will meet later this month to work on this plan further. Although we do not have all the answers to this important problem, we've made great strides over the past year in understanding the complexities and moving forward. I am convinced that in working together, we can make even more progress this year. ..�Sincerely, James W. Silva Vice Chairman, Board of Supervisors cc: Vicki Wilson, PFRD Larry Paul, County Executive Office Bob Beardsley, City of HB Don Noble, City of HB Rich Barnard, City of HB Bob Ghirelli, OCSD Charlie McGee, OCSD Ron Linsky, NWRI Lena Hayashi, Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy Aaron Buck, RWQCB-Santa Ana Region Larry Honeybourne, Health Care Agency Summary of Study Results Presented November 16, 2000 and Follow-up Actions Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed RESULTS OF STUDIES BLUE RIBBON PANEL FOLLOW UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS 7�4 4V1';&61i f4 Urban Runoff 1. Urban runoff carries a significant Contrary to the study authors, the • PFRD to implement and fund year-round, amount of bacterial indicators through Panel feels the net benefits resulting non-storm diversions in Talbert the Talbert Watershed. from the diversions are substantial for Watershed. PFRD funded. 2. A viral indicator of fecal pollutionwas both the Talbert Marsh and surf zone. • City of Huntington Beach to continue found in one sample location Recommends urban runoff pump station diversions in Talbert (Flounder Pump Station). diversions continue. Watershed. City funded, 3. Primary source of runoff is overspray from residential irrigation. 4. Runoff contains significant amounts of indicator bacteria. Natural Sources • Recommends fingerprinting or 5. Natural sources are significant speciation studies as a means of • PFRD to lead and fund study of source contributors of indicator bacteria. Identifying pathways and specific identification. PFRD& NWRI funded. 6. Talbert Marsh contributes about the health risks. Recommends no same amount of total coliform to the epidemiological study until this is nearshore zone as urban runoff from resolved. the Talbert Watershed does. • Concludes the fecal pollution is of 7. Talbert Marsh contributes more concern regardless of whether its enterococcus and E. coli than urban origins are human or animal. runoff from the Talbert Watershed Concludes measuring the ratio of fecal- does. to-total coliform as useful clue to bacterial source. Sewer Line Leakage 8. Leaking sewer lines contaminating the Concurs with this conclusion. ocean via groundwater has been ruled out based on these and prior studies. Draft- 12112/00 Page 1 Summary of Study Results Presented November 16, 2000 and Follow-up Actions Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed RESULTS OF STUDIES BLUE RIBBON PANEL FOLLOW UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS Sanitation District Out/all 9. It is speculated that the location of the Recommends additional research on • OCSD to lead and fund study of oulfall sewage outfall plume MAY interact the power plant's influence and use plume. OCSD funded. with power plant intake & ouffall to of 24-hour sampling; should take direct bacteria into the surf zone at simultaneous samples in various monitoring station 9-North. However, locations and examine thermocline. the current studies were not designed • Recommends OCSD Include the • Any change in OCSD's monitoring to address this hypothesis so there power plant ouffall in regular program to be deferred until study are no data to support it or refute it at monitoring program. completed. this time. Nature of.Water Quality Impairment 10 In the study area, water quality impairment is limited to the area between the river and the pier while wet weather impairment extends north and south of the river. 11. Dye studies showed complex ocean currents and very different flow patterns inside the surf zone vs. outside. The warm water plume from the power plant affects the general flow patterns. 12. Unlike the dye used to track flows, bacteria die off in the surf zone. Therefore the patterns of bacteria movement cannot be modeled perfectly with dye studies. 13. Tides appear to bring bacteria into the Recommends using these data to Next studies to address(see#5 and 9 surf zone because water quality is design a cost-effective ocean above). generally worse during large tidal sampling strategy, including marsh ranges (spring tides) and better during and hot spots in surf zone. small tidal ranges (neap tides). Draft—12/12/00 Page 2 Summary of Study Results Presented November 16, 2000 and Follow-up Actions Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed RESULTS OF STUDIES BLUE RIBBON PANEL FOLLOW UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS 14. Indicator bacteria counts are higher at Recommends more research on • Rates of under-protective &over- night than during the day, probably time-of-day patterns to develop protective postings were based on because sunlight kills bacteria. As a predictive tools for decisions to post assumption that HCA does not post result, the current morning sampling & unpost. beaches in winter; to be recalculated. practices probably result in more • HCA needs to use actual testing results postings than warranted. as the basis of posting decisions. 15. Finds mixed results on the Recommends urban runoff • Diversions to continue year-round effectiveness of diversions. diversions continue. Contrary to the (except during storms) beginning in Shortcomings of the study may have study authors, the Panel feels the net summer 2001. PFRD funded, prevented researchers from benefits resulting from the diversions documenting the benefits are substantial for both the Talbert unequivocally. Marsh and surf zone. 16. Recommends specific pump station • Recommends more extensive • Next studies to address operations to reduce surf zone research during summer months contamination. (this study was only 2 weeks in May). x qp M I +.. ` .. i# `ti:.: •_ate i l' . c A cox Y= . , 4 :.s� 17. Because of the lag time between Agreed. Recommends additional (See#14 above) sampling & results, health advisories work on timing of sample collection. are frequently not well synchronized with actual water quality conditions. 18. Because of the calculation formula, there can be large differences in the number of violations without major changes in average bacteria count. 19.Geometric mean of bacteria only marginally worse in summer 1999 than 1998 or 2000. The number of health advisories was lower in 2000. Not enough data to determine if this is a trend or not. Draft— 12/12/00 Page 3 Summary of Study Results Presented November 16, 2000 and Follow-up Actions Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed RESULTS OF STUDIES BLUE RIBBON PANEL FOLLOW UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS Recommends fingerprinting or speciation studies during exceedance periods as a . PFRD to lead and fund study of source means of Identifying pathways and specific health risks. Recommends no identification. PFRD & NWRI funded. epidemiological study until this is resolved. Recommends additional research on the power plant's influence and use of 24-hour . OCSD to lead and fund study of outfall sampling; should take simultaneous samples in various locations and examine plume. OCSD funded. thermocline (same as #9 above). . Any change in OCSD's monitoring to be deferred until study completed. Recommends using these data to design a cost-effective ocean sampling strategy, . Next studies to address. including marsh and hot spots In surf zone (same as#13 above). Recommends additional work on time-of-day patterns of bacterial contamination that . Posting 'accuracy' rates to be may lead to predictive tools for posting decisions (same as#14 above), recalculated; prediction approach to posting decisions not consistent with State regulations. Recommends more extensive research during summer months (same as#15 above). . Next studies to address. Recommends urban runoff diversions continue (same as#15 above). . Diversions to continue year-round (except during storms) beginning 6/01. PFRD funded. Recommends OCSD include the power plant outfall in regular monitoring program. . OCSD monitoring program is determined by RWOCB permit. Additional work to understand Interactions between Santa Ana River, Talbert Marsh, . Next studies to address. flood control channel system, and surf zone. Rapid Detection Technology is a lower priority since technology is still in its infancy. . No action at this time. Determined a critical need to quickly translate these results into a revised action plan . In process. focusing on cost-effectiveness. Recommends adding microbial ecologist to research team. . Next studies to address. Recommends tight quality assurance-quality control protocols in future studies. Recommends refining the oceanographic modeling, although not on a large scale before contamination patterns are better understood. Recommends database organization and storage, making data available to other researchers. Draft- 12/12/00 Page 4 Summary of Study Results Presented November 16, 2000 and Follow-up Actions Talbert-Lower Santa Ana River Watershed Draft- 12/12/00 Page 5 USDA Unhed Stabs Department of Agriculture ohlce of Me secretary Waehinglon,D.C.20250 JAN 7 2001 Blake Anderson, General Manager Norman Eckenrode,Board Chairman Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-8127 Dear Mr.Anderson: 1 am writing in regard to the Santa Ana River Watershed Memorandum of Understanding. This Memorandum was signed by a number of parties in Washington,D.C. on September 15,2000. Subsequently,the document was circulated to regional federal,state and local offices for additional signatures. For your files I am enclosing a copy of the final Memorandum of Understanding with attached signature sheets. This copy will provide a record of the agreement and its original federal, state, and local partners. Additional parties may join the initiative as outlined by the agreement. Thank you for your ongoing assistance with this collaborative effort. Sincerely, Q GEORGESCHUNK Special Assistant Natural Resources and Environment Enclosure M EVaal DeponuMtr Em ", SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND OTHER INTERESTS IN COLLABORATION WITH THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED GROUP This Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)is entered into by the undersigned Federal, state and local agencies and other interests for the purpose of exploring initiatives that address concerns regarding the Chino Basin and Santa Ana River watershed of California I. INTRODUCTION A. A Challenged Watershed The Santa Ana River is the largest river in Southern California and winds its way 100 miles from its headwaters in the San Bernardino Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. It flows through one of the most rapidly urbanizing watersheds in the nation and serves as the major source of drinking water for-its more than 4.7 million inhabitants. Mid-point on the river is the 50 square mile Chino Basin Dairy Area(Dairy Area, see the attached map)which includes a concentration of 270 dairy operations. Within the Dairy Area there are more than 350,000 dairy animals producing close to 1 million tons of manure annually. The dairies constitute a$1 billion industry and provide 25%of California's milk production, a significant contribution to the economic well being of the region. ' Since drainage controls within the Dairy Area are virtually non-existent,the operations are vulnerable to stormwater events. Two million tons of manure are stockpiled within the Dairy Area. Furthermore,the volume of surface water runoff has increased in recent decades due to significant up-slope urban development. The impacts of the dairy operations on the water quality of the Santa Ana River are well documented. The 1998 California 303(d)List and TMDL Priority Schedule established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board cites agriculture as a source of significant impairment to the Santa Ana River watershed due to nutrients,pathogens,suspended solids,salinity,total dissolved solids and chlorides. The five million acre-feet Chino groundwater basin underlying the Dairy Area has been identified by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's Integrated Water Resources Plan as a critical piece in solving California's water needs and demands on Colorado River water. Urbanization, 40 years of dairy operations,and other sources have contributed to its t degradation. Due to the degraded nature of the groundwater a court recently ordered the preparation of a management plan to cleanse the basin, including, for example,the installation of a series of desalters.Urbanization within the three counties comprising the Santa Ana River watershed-Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties-and the concentrated Dairy Area have impacted wildlife and wetlands. The Chino Basin is home to several wildlife species that have been listed as endangered or threatened under the authority of the Federal Endangered Species Act(ESA). B. Response of the Community and Conservation Efforts Taken to Date Dairy operators,their local communities,and a broad range of Federal,state and local govemments have collaborated on a number of projects to help mitigate the environmental and economic impacts felt by the Chino Basin and Santa Ana River watershed. The communities recognize the Dairy Area is facing a major transition. Numerous regulatory and voluntary water quality responses have been taken. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board issued orders August 20, 1999, requiring that: (1)waste containment plans be implemented;(2)manure be removed from the Dairy Area or deposited in a storage site within 180 days of removal from corals; and(3) stockpiled manure be removed within 2 years of the date of the orders. The United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) and San Bernardino County have provided$10 million in funding for implementation of dairy drainage controls. The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)has provided a$100,000 grant to the Santa Ana River Watershed Group(SARW Group)for the development of a Manure Management Strategy. The SARW Group includes dairy.farmers, environmental interests, affected counties and cities,water agencies,and state and Federal agencies. The SARW Group's October 1999 draft manure strategy,entitled Manure Management Strategy Report to the Chino Basin, Santa Ana River Watershed,was an impetus for this MOU. In addition to desalting projects,other water projects are being undertaken by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and two Orange County agencies. The Orange County Water District and Sanitation Districts are proceeding with a program to reclaim over 100,000 acre-feet of wastewater per year,one-sixth of the Orange County water supply. To help control surface water runoff,the Army Corps of Engineers has joined with the Orange County Flood Control District and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District in a $1.4 billion program to construct the Seven Oaks Dam on the upper Santa Ana River and to raise Prado Dam in the lower Dairy Area The Orange County Water District(OCWD)has constructed close to 400 acres of wetlands to remove nitrogen from the waters of the river,with significant benefit to wildlife. The population of the Least Bell's Vireo,a Federally recognized endangered species,has grown from less than 20 pairs to more than 200 under a program developed by OCWD in coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The conservation of the Santa Ana Sucker, a fish listed as threatened under the Federal ESA,is currently being addressed in a similar collaborative manner. 2 C. The Santa Ana River Watershed —An Opportunity to Create a National Model for Urbanizing Watersheds The SARW Group wants to build on these ongoing planning and conservation efforts. It seeks the expertise, funding and collaboration of key state and Federal agencies, including the California Resources Agency, California Environmental Protection Agency(CEPA), California Department of Food and Agriculture(CDFA),EPA,USDA,Department of the Interior(DOI), Department of Defense(DOD), Department of Transportation(DOT), and Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). These agencies have previously focused their resources on several watersheds of national significance,such as the Florida Everglades, Chesapeake Bay, the California Bay-Delta and Columbia River Basin. The difficulties faced by the concentrated dairy uses and urbanizing environment of the Chino Basin and Santa Ana River watershed present an opportunity to coordinate efforts in a pilot program serving a watershed of regional significance in a challenged environment. BASED ON THE FOREGOING,the purpose of this MOU is to coordinate existing efforts, and explore the development of specific joint initiatives to protect and ensure the health of the Santa Ana River watershed. The parties agree to participate in the SARW Group and cooperate as set forth below in exploring approaches for addressing the described concerns, issues and opportunities. II. STATE AND FEDERAL INTERESTS The state and Federal agencies have identified the following interests with respect to the Santa Ana River watershed. As the process unfolds the agencies may explore other interests. • Environmental concerns such as water and air quality, wildlife and wetlands. These concerns include: (1) the development of approaches to reduce salts, nitrates and other pollutants discharged by animal feeding operations (AFOs); (2)management of dairy drainage controls; (3)use of organic wastes such as manure, biosolids, greenwaste and foodwaste in producing energy, soil amendments and building materials; and(4) enhancement and conservation of wildlife habitat,wetlands and open space; • Enhanced conservation and management of groundwater and surface water resources; • Encouragement and assistance to local agencies in developing approaches for"smart growth"; that is, approaches that will more efficiently provide sustainable development, economic competitiveness and environmental quality, while conserving natural resources; and • Coordination and implementation of Federal, state and local regulation in a manner that achieves the letter and spirit of the law, while respecting local communities and private interests. 3 III. IMTIATIVES In addressing the interests identified above,the parties agree to explore the following initiatives: • Dairy "Residuals"Management Program Participation in a regional program to address APO and dairy residuals affecting water supply and groundwater and to promote the long-term conservation of dairy uses in a portion of the Dairy Area. This would include the exploration of an approach similar to the agreement with the Pork Producers,pursuant to the California Dairy Assurance Partnership Agreement involving EPA,USDA and the dairy industry. An ancillary focus would be the development of agreements or approaches with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to bring the dairies into compliance with water quality laws. • Chino Basin Center For Organic Materials. Participation by EPA,USDA,United States Department of Energy, CDFA,and CEPA in an effort to address organic materials (manure, biosolids,foodwaste, and greenwaste) systemically,leveraging off the efforts to address manure management. Critical concerns relate to the role of agriculture in the watershed, as well as the surrounding region,in further utilizing organic"wastes"while taking into consideration concerns regarding the increasing accumulation of salts is California's groundwater. The Dairy Area and Santa Ana River watershed would be viewed as one"node"within a broader systemic"innovation"web focused on these concerns. Specifically, this would include the exploration of the establishment of a "Chino Basin Center for Organic Materials" focusing on the processing of manure in conjunction with other organic materials currently refused by landfills. • Wildlife, Wetlands and Recreaiion Resource Conservation Program Examination by DOI, EPA,Army Corps of Engineers,USDA, California Department of Fish and Game, California Resources,CEPA, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board of means to enhance, restore and conserve wildlife habitat and wetlands and create regional recreational opportunities. The effort would include the collaborative exploration of a resource conservation program focusing on the lower Dairy Area adjacent to Prado Basin,as well as the Santa Ana River,that would proactively address the conservatidn of natural resources and establishment of a watershed-wide trail and recreation system. This effort would incorporate watershed reconnaissance feasibility studies currently being completed by USDA and the Army Corps of Engineers. • Urban Transition Planning Smart Growth Program Participation by EPA, USDA, California Resources, CEPA,and CDFA in efforts to assist and support local agencies with respect to "smart growth';that is,the orchestration of local,state and Federal programs to promote efficient urban forms that protect the environment, "quality of life" and the conservation of natural resources,taking advantage of existing transportation infrastructure and working to balance urban growth with open space conservation. This could take the form of assistance with respect to an Urban Transition Planning effort that would focus on the portion of the Dairy Area in transition,addressing phasing from 4 agricultural to urban uses and broader smart growth and sustainable development concems and opportunities. i • Scientific Data and Informadon. Participation by the U.S. Geological Survey(USGS) and other cooperating agencies in efforts to provide water quality and other hydrologic data and information that are supportive of the interests and initiatives identified above. 'these efforts could include monitoring of surface, vadose zone, and ground water in and around the Dairy Area; interpretive studies focusing on budgets for water,nutrients, dissolved solids, and other constituents in and around the Dairy area;and research focusing on the fate and transport of pathogens,organic carbon,and other constituents of concern that are related to the dairy industry concentrated in the Chino Basin. This effort would include ongoing studies conducted by the USGS through its programs, such as the National Water Quality Assessment,Federal-State Cooperative,National Research,and Drinking Water Initiative Programs. • Conjunctive Groundwater Management,Replenishment and Conservation Program. Participation by DOI,Bureau of Reclamation,EPA,Arty Corps of Engineers, California Resources and California Department of Water Resources in efforts to assist and encourage local agencies in the development and implementation of programs and projects to manage groundwater basins and to conserve and reclaim water within the Santa Ana River watershed. This would include efforts within the watershed to increase groundwater storage in the Chino Basin,the installation ofdesalters,and the reclamation and reuse of wastewater for the replenishment of groundwater basins, all as part of a water management program coordinated with state and Colorado River planning. IV. PARTICIPATION17V THESARW GROUP Subject to existing authorities and availability of funds,the parties intend to participate in the SARW Group to explore and design methods for implementing the efforts described above. This MOU does not obligate or commit Federal funds and will not give rise to a claim for Federal funds. Any activity involving reimbursement or contribution of funds between the parties to this MOU must be independently authorized by law and will be subject to applicable laws, regulations,and procedures. The SARW Group shall continue to be convened in the spirit of the public scoping process contemplated by the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act. In keeping with this approach,the SARW Group works to scope concerns,issues, opportunities and potential alternative solutions, assisting in the formulation of approaches, visions and initiatives that can then be implemented by individual agencies or several agencies acting in collaboration. The SARW Group will be convened under the auspices of Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties,the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and the Orange County Sanitation District as the"Principal Conveners." The Principal Conveners may establish"Specific Area Conveners" 5 for addressing individual areas within the watershed. Other agencies and interests may choose to participate in this MOU by signing it below. Each participating agency and organization will designate a representative to act on its behalf under this MOU. V. AMENDMENTOFMOUANDTERMINATIONOFPARTICIPATION This MOU may be amended only by a writing signed by the state and Federal agencies and the Principal Conveners. Any parry to the MOU may cease to be a party by providing written notice of such termination to the Principal Conveners. VI. LEGAL CONSISTENCY All provisions of this MOU are intended and shall be interpreted to be consistent with applicable provisions of state and Federal law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this MOU on the dates set forth below their signatures. 6 FEDERAL AGENCIES . Charles Fox,Assistant Administrator a icia Marcus, Region Administrator r Water Region IX,Environmental Protection Environme Pao ction Agency Agency Dated: /S O0 Dated: elm�dI Mary E. Da e, Actin Assistant Secretary Jeff-/ ,Stat Conservationist for Water and Science US1Y CS Deparhme t f the Interior Dated: ll•20•00 Dated: /n !+ a9 4iam=ie Clark,Director Mi el anager, Califomia/Nevada h and Wildlife Service Operatio Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and iIdl4 a Service Dated:7;jpaa,1. -�)5 6 Dated: L q a41 W. Westph Colonel John Carroll,District Engineer ssistant Secretary of the Awry U.S. Corps of Engineers for Civil or s Dated: Dated: ZX19 J es Lyons,U de ecretazy &rt W.Johnso egional Director tur esources Environment Lower Colorad egion U. . ep to 'culture Department of the Interior Dated: Bureau of Reclamation Dated: 00 Michael Shulters, California State Representative,U.S. Geological Survey Department/p'f the/-Interior Dated: STATE F CALIFO M Nichols, Secretary P• Jo ph staff,40eneralrlifornia ; sources Agenc Santa Ana a�rshed � Dated: Date /40 Wwmar t� rt x Winston Hickox, Secretary' Blake derson, General Manager California Environmental Protection Orange Co Ty S tation District Agency W/ 21 Dated: 9 00 Dated: • Chino Basin Conveners Willi JLyons, .,Secretary Cali DepartmentofFood Agriculture 1 Dated: City of Ontario Dated: LOCAL AGENCIES AND INTERESTS Principal Conveners {"' < Gt a aL! r City of Chino Charles Smith, Chairman Dated: Orange County Board of Supervisors Dated: John Ta ion ,Me be Robert Fe .,tra,Executive Director Riversi ount Bo f Supervisors Milk Producers Council ed: Dated: '-2v°-7�''� Fred Aguiar,Member Ray Souza,President San Bernardino County Board of S Western United Dairymen Supervisors Dated: Dated: ii 'chard At eater,U4ral Mandger Dan Silver,Executive Director Inland Empire Utilities Agency Endangered Habitats League Dated: Dated: k 2f 2ooa OTHERS Traci Stewart, Chief Watermaster Services Chino Basin Watermaster m G. agg4ttr -S Dated: .2" S 2vo/ Chairman State Water Resources Control Board Dated: M v ) P. Barrett Kehl,General Manager Chino Basin Water Conservation District • I Dated: Johbt& Withers* Chairman State Water Resources Control Board, William R.Mills,General Manager Santa Ana Re$io Orange County Water District Acted: �1I LO O Dated: Ronald R.Gastelum,General Manager - Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Dated: *It is acknowledged that in signing this MOU,as with the Federal agencies,it is the understanding of the State agencies that this MOU does not obligate or commit State funds and will not give rise to a claim for State fiords. iii Date: February 6,2001 Orange County Sanitation Oisirict Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2001 ____________________________________________'__________ PLANT N0.1 yy Jan �$ Feb Mar 1a r 11 May rid Jun if Jul d AugSe Oct Nov 11 Dec s 1/1T "lam related Total: , MMMMMMMMMMR PLANT NO.2 Jan If Feb 11 Mar H Apr 11 Mav 11 Jun I Jul If Au If Sao If Dot to Nov If Dec If mom rmarea Total: 2Id no MMMMMMMMMR COIIeMion Systems Jan Feb Mar Am $ May Jun Jul Au Sep Oct Nov - Dec ve o tIW M DIWO relined Coll.: T0181 0 Trial Total role l T0181 Total Total Total Total Total Total Trial RJO:VSH:cf:ll This spreadsheet does not include in-house odor complaints glexcel.dtabmQdor Complaint Log.xls ' BZM?/BI 16:54 916-499-Z19fi-)Orange rAmnty Sanitation District M1 FEB-07-01 WED 17:51 P. 01 °= CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES µe B 925 L SMKe 6tate 1400 Sao MW.CA 9.5814 ML:(916)4aaaran-FAX:(916)11"08 February 6,2001 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES FROM: Mike Dillon,Executive Director Christina Dillon,Lobbyist RE: NEWS FROM THE CAPITOL SPEAKER'S COMMISSION ON REGIONALISM HOLDS FIRST CAPITOL MEETING: SPECIAL DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION DISCUSSED On Wednesday,January 24,the Speaker's Commission on Regionalism held their first of what will be several monthly regional meetings,to encourage the"regime]collaboration among communities and local governments." The thirty-one member commission has been charged with facilitating"a dialogue about the problems facing regions across the state,and provide a framework for addressing regional issues that tend to cross traditional city,county,school district,and special district boundarics." The commission will be asked to make recommendations with regard to state policies and governance structures by the completion of their scheduled hearings in October 2001,but will furnish lawmakers with a preliminary report in the Spring. Commission Chair.Nick Eolhnan,who also serves as the President of the California Center for Regional Leadership,told those present that the Speaker has requested the group not try to "reinvent the wheel,"as other Commissions have done quality work in various areas that they will be exploring. Instead,the Speaker has asked the Commissioners to"stand on the shoulders" of groups such as the Speaker's Commission on State and Local Government Finance or the Constitution Revision Commission. The heating featured testimony from local govemm nit and school representatives,including Steve Szalay,Executive Director for the California State Association of Counties;Chris McKenzie,Executive Director for the League of California Cities;Catherine Smith,Executive Director of the California Special Districts Association;and Rick Pratt,Assistant Executive Director or Governments]Relations for the Califumia Sch(wl Boards Association. The four speakers all concurred that the biggest challenge for local govemment is the unpredictability and instability of the revenue streams that fund their respective services. Each speaker was also asked about the validity of a recent local newspaper article that highlighted the expanding proliferation of sevaments of government:e.g. Catherine 117537181 16:54 916-448-Z1%->Brangn County Sanitation District Buz FEB-07-01 WED 17:52 P.02 Smith was asked if"them are really 4800 special districts?" Smith answered by saying,"If I do '.. nothing else here today,I need m refute that number."and then went on to explain the difference between the numerous units of service. Commissioner Julie Wright from the San Diego area asked,"Are there significant examples of consolidating special districts?...Do any of you see it happening or are there legal or state barriersT' Commissioner Wright went on to add that while she sees consolidation as a cost savings,inevitably"someone's ox gets gored"Commissioner David Abel later inquired as to whether or not the Commission should put forth recommendations for incentives to consolidate,to which the special district representative replied that commit law gives them enough local empowerment to do so now. Commissioner Wright countered,"I don't want discussion. I warn action. The cities and counties should do it too." The county representative responded,"We have had tremendous movement in this area The cuotdinatinn of services at dre local level has lean effective with counties,cities,and schools." He then cautioned,"On the issue of straight consolidation-do we need 58 counties? Thera,I think you run into big problems." When asked what the cities,counties,special districts,and schools might propose in the way of a solution for the Commission,a represenmtive for the cities stated,"We were told last year that the cities,counties,and special districts couldn't get their acts together. We put a nine-point plan together in 72 hours. They were good proposals and timely,and the door was slammed in our face." He went on to argue that"some politicians feel they most pit one facet against another- e.g.schools must suffer for counties to boncfit. We contend that is just not so." Towards the end of the hearing,the Assembly and Senate Local Government Chairs, Assemblywoman Patricia Wiggins and Senator Tom Torhhkson respectively,addressed the Commission and noted that they will continue to do work in the area of providing local government or"TRAP"relief in 2001. One of Senator Torlakson's proposals would be to provide LRAF relief dollars as a reward to local governments for the production of a local"smart growth"plan. Assemblywoman Wiggins noted that she would be working towards a plan to cap the growth on ERAR D� The Commission on Regionalism will hold its next meeting in Los Angeles on Feb�3. For additional information on theCommission,please vigil their site at www.regionalism.org, ce:CASA Executive Board ' INSIDE EPA-January 12,2001 E=A SEWER OVERFLOW PROPOSAL WILL LIKELY SPARK DEBATE EPA has proposed regulations addressing sanitary sewer overflows(SSOs)that are expected to spark heated debate over exactly what a wastewater treatment facility's responsibilities are under the new rules. The two areas that sources expect to be most controversial are whether a publicly owned treatment work (POTW)is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of satellite sewage collection systems and the degree of protection provided to POTWs in the event an SSO occurs even when the facility took every action possible to avoid one. EPA Administrator Carol Browner Jan.4 signed a proposed regulation addressing SSOs that for the first time requires Clean Water Act permits for satellite collection systems.A satellite system is defined by EPA as a collection system owned or operated by one entity that discharges to a regional collection system owned or operated by a different entity. Some observers say this will add to an already backlogged permitting system. The rule also outlines the conditions that a POTW would be required to meet in order to present an affirmative defense in the one of an SSO. Some industry sources believe that they will be unable to defend themselves in an agency enforcement action in the event of an SSO that they could not prevent.A copy of the proposal is available on our websire, InsideEPA.com. See page 2 for derails. OMB has been reviewing the long-awaited rule since March 31,2000,and some sources had begun to wonder if the proposal would be released during the Clinton administration.One source says that one reason for the delay in releasing the rate back to EPA was an ongoing battle between OMB and the Department of Justice over whether to include language allowing POTWs to opt for voluntary best management practices rather than treatment in lieu of an overflow. According to the source,the Department of Justice won out and the voluntary options were not included. However, an agency source says that OMB's primary concern was that municipalities would not be able to comply with the regulations because they simply do not have sufficient funds. EPA hopes to publish the proposal in the Federal Register before Jan.20. Z4'0� CovE2 MCEIho 'ro FM—$ t32y*4eA CovelL mc-o" ro tTcf tT� iECreii.,riaee r CtIZ��N , 'µcCt�t4A.� Cps 4,,_eYE PACYars£ to 414uxtu.(r oorENr fR*40^n c.OwPL£M PAC11:40 -M 7tftSEr4vt 7— Regulatory To: Members & Affiliates, Wet Weather Issues Committee From: National Office Pfz� Date: January 11, 2001 r£ PO nor' Subject: E,.nBAN' R„cf / EPA'S PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW(SSO)RULE Reference: RA 01-2 (ALSO r-Aco ,,4 ,Fs c Mcs,, �"""� vI•+S tMC�•'I�rr)ICt41Fe The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PA signed r� se le o Sv`t g y(EPA) geed and released the long-delayed proposed rule on a sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) on January 5 (see January 5, 2001 AMSA FaxAlerr). 4+&TFepe9eA-Pule A-' -aem-�. EPA has released a"pre-publication"version of the proposed rule to AMSA and other key stakeholders to facilitate early review and comment. Due to its extreme length, the preamble was omitted in this Regulatory Alert. Copies of the entire rule,including the preamble,have been posted on AMSA's website at hap.//www.amso-cleanwater.org as an attachment to this Regulatory Alert within the Member Pipeline, and can also be found on EPA's website at hitp://www.epa.gov/owWmimakef him. At.this time, AMSA asks that you review the rule for preliminary issues and concerns. The National Office will distribute a more focused Alert and request for comments upon the rule's publication in the Federal Register. EPA's release of the proposed rule at this time is significant given the prolonged internal review by the Office of Management&Budget(OMB), and its proximity to the beginning of the new Administration. President Clinton had originally ordered a proposed rule to be issued by May 2000,but concerns raised by both OMB and the U.S. Department of Justice(DOJ) caused the deadline to be missed. AMSA met with OMB several times during the review period to discuss key issues of concern to the Association. We understand that OMB's major issues related to the anticipated cost impacts of this rule and the need to explore a regulatory structure more closely resembling the National Combined Sewer Overflow Control Policy. There has been no indication as to whether OMB's or DOYs major concerns were addressed prior to EPA's release of the rule. KOYE'- T"M NEtN Fph hDMtr✓tSYRA-*Gi COUGO 01ULL ,Tiff 1QucF BACK rap— Proposed Rule Summary $iQ""F` r MaDIFIfA-ncvJ • `kF �St pO 1- � Attached,please find copies of the proposed regulatory language. The first attachment(ATTACHMENT A) is the version which was distributed directly by EPA. The second attachment(ATTACHMENT B) is AMSA's redline/strikeout version which illustrates how the rule has been revised over the past year since the October 1999 Williamsburg"consensus agreement"by the Subcom-mittee established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The rule has changed significantly in several areas since the 1816 Jefferson Place, NW, Washington, DC 20036-2505 ' 202.833.2672 • 202,833.4657 FAX - hapd/vmv ..amsa-clearwa¢r.org 4 :,;e AMSA RA 01-2 January i1, 2001 Page 2 "consensus agreement". However,relatively few changes were made since the last time AMSA reviewed the draft regulatory language (refer to Regulatory Alert RA 00-11, May 5, 2000). The following is a section-by-section summary of the key components of the proposed rule. A brief discussion that highlights some of AMSA's key issues and concerns is also included; however,this discussion is not comprehensive. AMSA's final comments will depend entirely on the type of issues and concerns raised by the membership during the upcoming comment period. Satellite Collection Systems This section requires states to either issue a permit to each owner or operator of a satellite collection system',or issue a permit to the operator of the POTW treatment facility which receives wastewater from the satellite collection system(see §122.38(a)). This second option is available only"where the operator of the POTW treatment facility has adequate legal authority"(emphasis added). Permit applications must be submitted by each satellite collection system, except where the NPDES permit for the POTW already includes permit conditions that apply to the satellite systems(§122.38(c)(1)), in accordance with the outlined schedule(§122.38(c)(2)). Current Issues and Concerns: AMSA has expressed concerns with the level of state discretion to choose the applicable permit approach in this section. During the negotiations,AMSA argued for requiring greater regulatory responsibility for satellite communities to adequately operate and maintain their systems,while emphasizing the need for flexibility on the type of control mechanism that was employed (i.e.,permit, ordinance,memorandum of agreement, etc.). Several AMSA members have indicated that there would be no major objection to using individual or general NPDES permits for each connecting satellite system,but would oppose the state's imposition of permit responsibility on the POTW treatment facility. EPA has attempted to modify the POTW permit approach by allowing it to be used only where the legal authority exists to control satellite collection systems. AMSA is interested in your comments on whether EPA's permit options are acceptable, especially considering the potential for your facility assuming permit responsibility for your satellite collection systems. Capacity. Management. Operation and Maintenance Programs fC-MOM) This C-MOM program language represents the bulk of the regulatory changes being proposed. All permittees will now be required to develop and implement a C-MOM program to comply with certain "general standards"(§122.42(e)(2)). These standards include the requirement to(i)properly manage, operate and maintain all parts of the collection system, (ii)provide adequate capacity to convey base and Satellite collection systems are defined(§122.38(b))as"any device or system that meets each of the following criteria: (1)is owned or operated by a 'state' or 'municipality' ...; (2)is used to convey municipal sewage or industrial waste to a POTW treatment facility that has an NPDES permit or is required to apply for a permit ...; and(3) the owner or operator is not the owner or operator of the POTW treatment facility that has an NPDES permit or has applied for an NPDES permit." AMSA RA 01-2 January 11, 2001 Page 3 peak flows; (iii)take all feasible steps to stop, and mitigate the impact of, SSOs in the collection systems; (iv) provide notification to parties with a reasonable potential for exposure to overflow pollutants; and(v) develop a written summary of the C-MOM program and make it available to the public (§I22.42(e)(1)). All C-MOM programs must include certain specified components, except to the extent to which the permittee has demonstrated that an individual component is inapplicable. The following is a summary list of the required components (§122.42(e)(2))(i - ix): (i) Goals - Identification of major C-MOM goals consistent with general standards (see above). (ii) Organization- Identification of persons responsible for C-MOM implementation, and of the chain of communication for reporting SSOs. (iii) Legal Authority- Inclusion of legal authority to control infiltration and inflow (VI), require sewers and connections to be properly designed and constructed, ensure proper installation, testing, and inspection of new and rehabilitated sewers, address flows from satellite collection systems, and implement the general and specific prohibitions of the national pretreatment program. (iv) Measures and Activities- Development of the following elements: (A)provide adequate maintenance facilities and equipment; (B) maintenance of a map of the collection system; (C)management of relevant information to prioritize C-MOM activities such as "the immediate elimination of dry weather overflows or overflows into sensitive waters such as public drinking water supplies and their source waters, swimming beaches ..."; (D) routine preventative operation and maintenance activities; (E) a program to assess the current capacity of the collection system and treatment facilities; (F) identification and prioritization of structural deficiencies and appropriate rehabilitation activities to address such deficiencies; (G) appropriate training; and (H) equipment and replacement parts inventories. (v) Design and Performance Provisions- Establishment of requirements and standards for installation of new sewers and rehabilitation and repair projects, and procedures for inspecting and testing the installation of new sewers and for rehabilitation and repair projects. (vi) Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications - Requirement to monitor the implementation of the C-MOM program, and update program elements as appropriate. (vii) Overflow Emergency Response Plan - Development and implementation of an overflow emergency response plan that identifies measures to protect public health and the AMSA RA 01-2 January 17, 2001 Page 4 environment, including procedures to ensure that overflows are appropriately responded to and that appropriate immediate notification to the local health and state NPDES authority is made. (viii) System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan- Preparation and implementation of a plan for system evaluation and capacity assurance if peak flow conditions are contributing to an SSO discharge or to noncompliance at a treatment plant, unless steps have already been taken to correct the hydraulic deficiency or the discharge is caused by "severe natural conditions". (ix) C-MOM Program Audits - Performance of an audit of the C-MOM program in association with the permit application and submittal of a report summarizing performance and steps to respond to deficiencies. The C-MOM program is not reviewed by the state permit authority for approval. Rather, the permittee is expected to develop a program that satisfies the components and to later conduct "C-MOM program audits" as part of the NPDES permit application and submit reports specifying "deficiencies and steps to respond to them" (§122.42(e)(2)(ix)). Dates for implementation of the various C-MOM components were not included in the proposed rule. However, a series of recommended deadlines are proposed in the preamble (see Section III.L of the preamble). The C-MOM provisions also contain certain exceptions for "small collection systems" (systems with average daily flow of 1.0 MGD or less, or 2.5 MGD or less) (§122.42(e)(4)). Current Issues and Concerns: AMSA devoted considerable energy to the negotiation of the C-MOM provisions. As a result, the existing language is one area of the proposed rule that has received considerable support from AMSA. One major outstanding concern of AMSA's is the relatively weak linkage between a POTW's implementation of its C-MOM program and the level of enforcement discretion given the state in the case of an SSO discharge. It is clear that EPA's Office of Enforcement & Compliance Assurance (OECA) is continuing to prioritize communities experiencing SSOs for enforcement action. AMSA has argued that the primary mechanism for potentially offsetting an enforcement action is the development and implementation of a C-MOM program. AMSA encourages the membership to closely review the C-MOM provisions, evaluate the extent to-which your system has implemented these protocols, and consider prompt action to implement any parts-of the program where your system is lacking. AMSA is concerned, however, that EPA is sending mixed signals about the linkage between C-MOM implementation and the exercise of enforcement discretion of SSO discharges. The proposed rule indicates that "the Director will consider the quality of the CMOM program, its implementation and effectiveness in any relevant enforcement action, including but not limited to any enforcement action for violation of the prohibition" of SSO discharges (§122.42(e)(2)). At the same time, the preamble indicates that "compliance with CMOM permit requirements generally would not limit liability for SSO AMSA RA 01-2 January 11, 2001 Page 5 discharges" (Section III.O of the preamble). This discrepancy needs to be removed, and a stronger statement regarding C-MOM implementation and enforcement discretion is needed. In that regard, the National Office encourages the membership to offer recommendation on specific language that AMSA could advocate. Prohibition of SSO Discharges The proposed rule contains a general prohibition of SSO discharges to "water of the United States that occur prior to a POTW treatment facility" (§122.42(f)(1)). The rule also proposes the use of enforcement discretion for SSOs caused by "severe natural conditions" and affirmative defenses for discharges caused by "other factors",based on a modified version of the existing "bypass" and "upset"provisions of §122.42(m) and (n). The proposed rule also clarifies that the burden of proof rests with the permittee to establish compliance with these provisions (§122.42(f)(4)). The proposed rule authorizes the use of enforcement unless the permittee can demonstrate through relevant evidence that"the discharge was caused by severe natural conditions", such as hurricanes, tornados,widespread flooding, earthquakes, tsunamis, and other similar natural conditions (§I 22.42(f)(2)(i)). The permittee must also demonstrate that"there was no feasible alternatives to the discharge". This demonstration is not satisfied if`the permittee should have installed auxiliary or - additional collection system components, wastewater retention or treatment facilities, adequate back-up equipment or should have reduced inflow and infiltration" (§122.42(f)(2)(ii)). A claim must be submitted to the permit authority within 10 days of the date of discharge. Alternatively, the proposed rule enables the permittee to establish an "affirmative defense"to an enforcement action for noncompliance with its technology-based effluent limitations (§122.42(f)(3)). In order to qualify for such a defense, the permittee must demonstrate through relevant evidence that the cause of the discharge event can be identified, the discharge was "exceptional, unintentional, temporary and caused by factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee", the discharge could not have been prevented by "the exercise of reasonable control .... preventative maintenance,or installation of adequate backup equipment", and the permittee `took all reasonable steps to stop, and mitigate the impact of, the discharge as soon as possible" (§122.42(f)(3)(i, ii, iii and v)). A claim must be submitted to the permit authority within 10 days of the date of discharge. Current Issues and Concerns: AMSA remains concerned that the proposed prohibition standard does not give POTWs the appropriate liability protection for SSO discharges that are essentially uncontrollable. AMSA became involved in this debate over the concern that enforcement authorities were reading the requirements of the Clean Water Act too literally to mean "no overflows ever'. While POTWs can work to minimize overflows, AMSA's members have uniformly indicated that the "zero overflow" standard is impossible to meet. Even EPA recognizes that "some overflows are unavoidable, even at the best ran systems" (Section IV.B of the preamble). At every step in the negotiations, AMSA pushed the concept of an "unavoidable overflow" which the POTW would not be responsible for controlling (i.e., unanticipated blockages, wet weather events that exceed capacity ...). AMSA will AMSA RA 01-2 January 11, 2001 Page 6 continue to push for a stronger linkage between the C-MOM program and liability protection for SSO discharges as a way to reflect the realities of SSO occurrences. The National Office encourages members to indicate how the current proposed provision may play out in specific states and regions. In addition, EPA is requesting comments on a prohibition alternative that would authorize SSO discharges at less than secondary treatment from"peak excess flow treatment facilities"based on a BAT/ BCT model, similar to the CSO Policy framework (Section IV.0 of the preamble). Refer to ATTACHMENT C for a copy of the preamble discussion of this alternative approach. Using this approach, the C-MOM program would be modified to resemble the nine minimum controls of the CSO Policy. It appears clear from EPA's own interpretation of this approach that the Agency is uncomfortable with this level of flexibility. Under this alternative,EPA proposes establishing "screening criteria"for permit authorities to use in issuing permits to systems that wish to install "peak excess flow treatment facilities". AMSA has not taken a position on this alternative approach. AMSA encourages the membership to consider whether this alternative offers a better option for complying with effluent lirnits than the current proposed prohibition approach. Reporting.Public Notification and Recordkeepine This section (§122.42(g))establishes procedures for reporting and public notification of SSO discharges, and for keeping records on discharge events. EPA proposes the use of a new definition of SSO for use in reporting and public notice. The proposed definition indicates that an SSO is"an overflow, spill, release, or diversion of wastewater from a sanitary sewer system", which does not include combined sewer overflows (CSOs) or other discharges from the combined portions of a combined system (§122.42(g)(1)). The definition clarifies that SSOs include: (i)overflows that reach waters of the U.S.; (ii) overflows that do not reach waters of the U.S.; and(iii)wastewater backups caused by blockages or flow conditions, with the exception of such occurrences in privately owned building laterals. The permittee is required to notify relevant agencies of all SSOs that may "imminently and substantially endanger human health" (§I22.42(g)(2)). Immediate notification of the public, health agencies,and other affected entities is required for such SSOs in accordance with the C-MOM "overflow emergency response plan". In addition, the NPDES permit authority must be notified by oral or electronic report within 24 hours of when the permittee becomes aware of the overflow. Within 5 days of the time the permittee is made aware of the overflow, a written report must be filed with the NPDES permit authority which describes the location of the SSO, the specific receiving water, an estimate of the overflow volume,a description of the system component from which the discharge arose, the estimated date and time of the overflow, the cause or suspected cause, and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, prevent reoccurrence, or mitigate the impacts of the overflow. This section also contains requirements for reporting SSO information on "discharge monitoring reports" (DMR) and "annual reports". The permittee is required to report SSOs that discharge to waters of the U.S. on the DMR (§I22.42(g)(3)). The following information is required for SSOs to waters of the U.S. that occurred during the reporting period: (i) the total number of system overflows; (ii) the number of AMSA RA 01-2 January 11, 2001 Page 7 locations at which SSOs occurred that resulted from flows exceeding system capacity; (iii) the number of SSOs that are unrelated to system capacity; and (iv)number of locations at which SSOs occurred that are unrelated to system capacity. The permittee is also required to prepare an annual report of all overflows in the sewer system, including overflows that do not reach waters of the U.S. (§122.42(g)(4)). The report must include the date, location of overflow, any potentially affected receiving water, and estimated overflow volume. The per ni ttee is required to maintain and record SSO information for at least 3 years from the date of the overflow (§122.42(g)(5)). Detailed information must be kept for all SSOs, including overflows that do not reach waters of the U.S.. Current Issues and Concerns: During the FACA negotiations,AMSA was generally supportive of improved reporting and notification as a trade-off for liability protection for unavoidable overflows and the allowance of peak excess flow treatment facilities. However,AMSA maintained that required procedures should address only overflows reaching waters of the U.S.. This proposed rule extends EPA's jurisdiction beyond waters of the U.S., as is apparent from the proposed SSO definition. The National Office is interested in member comments on the issues surrounding reporting and notification of SSOs not reaching waters of the U.S.. Watershed Manaeement EPA did not include regulatory language on the use of watershed management in the proposed rule. Rather,the Agency discusses the use of watershed management in the preamble(Section III.M of the preamble)to phase certain long-term C-MOM activities and to prioritize the control of certain SSOs. However,EPA clearly indicates that"a watershed plan does not provide any additional liability protection or change the legal status of discharges to waters of the U.S., but could affect the timing of remedies." Current Issues and Concerns: During the FACA negotiations,AMSA consistently advocated for a stronger endorsement of watershed management in controlling SSOs. The"SSO Management Flow Chan", developed by AMSA and other stakeholders, embraced watershed management as the central principle for controlling overflows. At one time, the SSO Subcommittee endorsed the flow than as a consensus framework. However, EPA moved away from this approach after its two and one-half year hiatus in the negotiations because of disagreements with OECA and the Regions. AMSA remains concerned that the use of watershed management principles to prioritize control actions will not be encouraged if the language remains isolated in the preamble. The National Office encourages comment on EPA's discussion of watershed management in the preamble, and on specific recommendations on how the Agency might incorporate watershed management into the rule itself. Refer to ATTACHMENT D for a copy of the preamble discussion of watershed management principles. For Further Information Please contact Greg Schaner at 202/296-9836 or by email at gschaner@amsa-cleanwaterorg if you have any questions or would like to discuss any aspect of the proposed rule. ATTACHMENTS INSIDE EPA -January 12,2001 6 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING HEARINGS WILL COMMENCE IN SPRING The Senate Environment&Public Works Committee(EPW)will launch a series of hearings on water infrastructure funding problems this spring to move toward meeting one of EPW's top Republican Bob Smith's(R- NH)top priority of authorizing funds to repair the country's ailing drinking and wastewater systems,congressional sources say. Smith is joined by his co-chairman,Sen.Harry Reid(D-NV),in recognizing the importance of increased funding for water infrastructure.Reid told Inside EPA that the problem is most pressing for small towns across the country that do not have the revenue stream to even keep their systems up to snuff, let alone invest in long-term infrastructure development. The planned hearings will likely result in legislation addressing state loans and grants,as well as public-private funding mechanisms,"to bridge a trillion dollar gap between[water infrastructure)needs and funding provided,"a statement from the committee says. News of the hearings come as welcome news to drinking water and wastewater system officials. As chairman of EPW,says one congressional source,Smith believes the water infrastructure issue is"one of the top five environmental priorities"this year before EPW. If the series of hearings,which will be held by the Fisheries, Wildlife&Drinking Water Subcommittee,find that drinking water and wastewater infrastructure needs are of sufficient magnitude and pressing concern,then the subcommittee will discuss specific options for getting the systems the necessary funds. Some observers say,however,that it is still too early to comment on how much progress EPW will make on the water infrastructure front,noting that it is unclear to what extent the committee,and the Senate in general,will be able to work on a bipartisan basis to get the funding. In an interview with the Assistant Administrator for Water,I.Charles Fox,Fox told Inside EPA,"It's my expectation that there will be legislation significantly expanding infrastructure funding. . ..We literally have hundreds of billions of dollars in needs in this country,many of which are going unmet. 1 think in this time of unprecedented budget surplus,and a time of unprecedented need throughout the country,at this time of a Clean Water Act that has expired, I think that it is very likely that Congress will step into this arena and do so hopefully with a very resounding commitment to increase the amount of spending on infrastructure and water pollution control." The words of Smith and Fox offer further hope to the Water Infiasttucmre Network(WIN),a broad-based coalition of drinking water and wastewater providers,engineers and environmentalists,that will present a proposal either this or next month to President-elect George W.Bush and the incoming EPA Administrator,Christine Todd Whitman. WIN is seeking support for a multi-billion dollar,multi-year effort to upgrade the nation's water infrastructure in order to achieve water quality standards under the Clean Water Act,and while refraining from being too optimistic,they were surprised that the issue had taken on such great importance to Smith and Reid. In the House, the effort has garnered the support of approximately 90 lawmakers,and municipal sources say they hope to increase their support to over a hundred House members in the I07th Congress. One congressional source close to the issue says one of the options for increasing funding to drinking water and wastewater systems would be to expand the Clean Water State Revolving Fund(CWSRF)program. Under the CWSRF, EPA makes annual capitalization grants to individual states,which then loan the money out for use in projects that will improve water quality,such as upgrading and maintaining wastewater treatment facilities.As the loans are repaid,and the states recoup their funds,a revolving fund is created that allows the state to issue more loans. SignOn San Diego Nation -- A $1 trillion problem courses under America's streets Page 1 of 3 A $1 trillion problem courses under America's streets ASSOCIATED PRESS February 6, 2001 WASHINGTON — Replacing old water and sewer pipes and upgrading aging treatment plants around the country could cost $1 trillion over the next two decades, federal officials say. Lawmakers are trying to get attention for the problem— and a lot more money for upgrades. "There are significant unmet needs that require the federal government's immediate attention," Sen. George Voinovich, R- Ohio, said Tuesday. He introduced legislation to let the government provide more money for wastewater discharge pipes and treatment facilities. Last year, Congress created a $1.5 billion, two-year grant program to help municipalities deal with part of the infrastructure problem: combined systems that use the same conduits for sewage and rainwater. Voinovich's bill would allow the Environmental Protection Agency to give states up to $3 billion a year to deal with other wastewater infrastructure improvements. That may be just a drop in the bucket. A study commissioned by a group comprising sewer and water authorities, contractors, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and others estimated the overall cost of infrastructure needs — improvements to wastewater pipes, storm sewer pipes, the lines that carry clean water from plants to homes, the water plants themselves— at $1 trillion by 2020. A study by the Environmental Protection Agency used different methodology but reached the same conclusion. Steve Allbee, the author of the EPA forecast, said there will be a http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/assett2001-02-06_problem_courses.htm 02/07/2001 SignOn San Diego Nation —A $1 trillion problem courses under America's streets Page 2 of 3 gap of$23 billion a year over the next 20 years between what's spent on drinking water and wastewater systems and what's needed. He estimated that if customers alone pay the cost, their bills would increase an average of 6 percent a year over the two decades. That would pose a particular hardship in cities with both old pipes and declining populations, which will mean fewer taxpayers to share the burden. "It's more dramatic in the Rust Belt because of the financing issue and because of the aging of the systems," Allbee said. Many of the nation's wastewater treatment plants were built at roughly the same time, in the 1970s and early 1980s, and have roughly the same 30-to 40-year life span, he said. Those plants connect to underground pipes whose 50- to 75-year average life spans are ending or, in the oldest cities, to cast iron or brick pipes laid at the turn of the century, with a life span of 100 or 125 years. When those oldest pipes were designed, office buildings were shorter, water pressure was lower and roads carried lighter loads. Replacing pipes has been difficult for municipal systems that work hard just to service new customers and comply with new regulations that cover radon, arsenic, radionuclides, microbes and more. "In the last 30 years, the nature of the investment was to serve more and more people and to provide higher and higher treatment levels to make sure that the public health and environmental objectives were met," Allbee said. "If the present situation persists, the financial solvency of many drinking and wastewater systems will be in doubt," he said. House members last year organized themselves into a Water Infrastructure Caucus to work jointly on finding more federal funds to help communities pay for the looming repair and replacement bills. They got a good case study when a cast-iron pipe— parts of which had been carrying drinking water since 1895—gave out in downtown Cleveland, crushing an antique section of brick sewer. The break sent 25 million gallons of water cascading through the business district, closing some of the city's busiest streets for a week. hftp://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/asset(2001-02-06—problem—courses.htm 02/07/2001 SignOn San Diego Nation — A $1 trillion problem courses under America's streets Page 3 of 3 "The expense to our environment and the taxpayers will only increase the longer we procrastinate in addressing these needs," said Rep. Sue Kelly, R-N.Y. On the Net: Text of Voinovich's bill: voi rnovich.senate. ov/pr- 010206.html Environmental Protection Agency: www.opa.gov. Today's News I Sports I Marketplace I Entertainment Visitor Info Home ®Copyright 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/assett2001-02-06_problem_courses.htm 02/07/2001 LA Times Page 1 of 2 !'-i"-� ��'�=�t el• �/ Vf/ V4neV ri(//�AeVIA1IONe WMM94T r-nZs[0I1 Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Soona httpJ/V .latlmeS.Comtwims1200102l3/tCB00VO962.htmi Politics Travel Comments Entertainment Classifieds 9h000lna Back f0 storym491p,Leovies,art, jobs,homes. TV,manurents care r n I Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Study: U.S. Cities Need New Pipes By KATHERINE RIZZO,Associated Press writer WASHINGTON--Water and sewer bills,on average,will have to double without a big federal investment in new pipes and modem treatment plants, local governments and water agencies said in a study being released Tuesday. Safely moving clean water and flushed wastes involves a "staggering cost," said Detroit Mayor Dennis Archer, president of the National League of Cities. Older systems soon will need to be replaced, and that will take "a new partnership between federal, state,and local government," he said in a statement. The league and 28 other organizations are urging Congress to put up$57 billion over the next five years to help localities meet environmental requirements, replace old pipes and upgrade their plants. "Local govemments alone cannot keep pace with the skyrocketing costs of new drinking water and wastewater infrastructure," agreed William Schatz of the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District in Cleveland. Local governments and individual ratepayers currently bear about 90 percent of the cost of providing clean tap water and running wastewater systems, said Schatz,who has been lobbying on behalf of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies for more federal dollars. Keeping up with the nation's water and sewer needs will cost$1 trillion over the next 20 years, say private and government studies. That's about$23 billion a year more than already is being spent by state and local governments and ratepayers combined. "Financing the full $23 billion a year need with utility rate increases would result in a doubling of rates, on average,across the nation," the report says. "If this were to happen, at least a third of the population of the U.S. would face economic hardship." Experts predict an acute need for repairs and replacement of water and sewer facilities because many of the nation's wastewater treatment plants were built at roughly the same time -in the 1970s and early 1980s-with roughly a 30-to 40 - year life span. Those plants connect to underground pipes whose 50-to 75 -year average life spans are ending or, in the oldest cities,to cast iron or brick pipes laid about 100 years ago and nearing the end of their useful lives. Congress has begun to recognize the looming problem,but so far there have been few moves in the direction sought by Archer, Schatz and the numerous interest groups working together as the Water Infrastructure Network. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 02/13/2001 LA Times Page 2 of 2 Last year,Congress created a$1.5 billion two-year grant program to help municipalities deal with part of the in&estrueture problem-combined systems that use the same conduits for sewage and rainwater. ' Last week, Sen.George Voinovich,R-Ohio,proposed a$15 billion,five-year program to deal with other wastewater infrastructure improvements, but he said Monday he knows that won't be enough to make all the needed improvements. "Additional solutions need to be found,"Voinovich said. "The size of the need continues to be enormous and the safety of our water supply and the environment cannot be ignored." The groups lobbying together for a massive federal investment suggested a variety of proposals including grants and loans,loan subsidies and research into ways to extend the lifespan of existing infrastructure. On the Net: Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies: htto://www.amsa- cleanwater.ora/ National League of Cities:bM://www.nlc.ore Text of Voinovich's bill: htto://voinovich.senate.eov/In-010206.b.html Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Time Shop our ads w"out tearing us to pieces. ,�h � Selett ads from the Los AngelesTimes are online. Y v. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-birL/print.egi 02/13/2001 Huntington Beach Independent Page 1 of 2 CITY HALL lNews Cp How low does your VISAAPR go? t� � V/SA 299% .399% 4,99% 5.91^ 6.99% 79%.9 8999b Thursday,January 18, 2001 Sewer maintenance fees may be passed on to residents ■ Huntington Beach City Council agrees to study the costs of operating the lines. By TARIO MAL1K HUNTINGTON BEACH --Residents may bear some of the cost of repairing and maintaining the city's sewer lines. The City Council agreed Tuesday to study a possible maintenance fee for residents to pay for the operation, rehabilitation, replacement and maintenance of city sewer lines. "There are certain basic sorts of things that we have to deal with and the sewers are one of them," said Councilman Ralph Bauer,who brought up the issue. "The sewer system is a service just like water,and while we charge for what goes in the front door to their homes,we don't for what goes out the back door." In 1996,the City Council voted down efforts for a similar fee that would have cost residents and extra$1 per month and raise$1 million for sewer upkeep. If council members ultimately approve the sewer fee,city officials said the cost could be up to four or five times that for residents. A fee proposal,they added, should be ready by the Feb. 20 City Council meeting,where various methods of assessing the charge will be discussed. That includes an add-on to residential and commercial water bills,and whether the cost will be based on flat rate or the percentage of water usage. According to an infrastructure improvement management plan prepared in September,the city's sewer system is facing $120.5 million in total maintenance,operations,rehabilitation and replacement needs over the next 20 years. About$39 million is required for immediate needs. State water officials said the city generates 32 million gallons of sewage per day,which runs through about 600 miles of pipeline. "We have 28 sewage pump stations throughout the city,all of which need to be reconstructed, and we need to slip-line sewer lines as we find it's needed," said Robert Beardsley,the http://www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/cityhall/20010118/thb0004044.html 01/23/2001 Huntington Beach Independent Page 2 of 2 city's public works director. "But on the calendar we're on now, sewer fees won't probably appear on residential water bills until " November." City officials said study of the sewer component in city infrastructure needs has been going on for a number of years, and the system is among the most critical systems in Huntington Beach. When council members fast defeated the sewer fee five years ago, they were concerned that since water rates had just been increased,any additional charges would be too much. But Bauer said it may have prevented city officials much angst. "I like to think that had the fee passed, it could have prevented the problems the city is now facing with the [Orange County] Grand Jury,"he said. The grand jury is investigating allegations that the city failed to properly report massive sewage leaks in the 1990s.In 1996, city officials fast found sewer breaks in Pipes running beneath the Downtown and Old Town areas,wtth slip-lining measures to sea] the holes just recently reaching completion. "City Council members have a responsibility to be sure that the city can properly fund the projects that are needed most," Bauer said. Feedback to hbindyAlatimes.com Copyright 2000 Thnes Community News http://www.latimes.com/tcn/indynews/cityhaIU20010118/thb0004044.html 01/23/2001 t? Act O C r"(,(— LOCAL NEWS 4 The Orange County Register CITIES Saturday,Jan.27,2001 Competition for civil engineers puts cities in a bind GOVERNMENT: Hun- not and a qualified candidate vine. "Many students go to ficult time finding a permanent jects for the city,areea ecially the increase to a goner. tin ton Beach has to to take the position full-lime. computer engineering, Instead staff member. rare because a es Ne ggrroowth in clientele and Although it is not unusual for of civil,because of the idea of Other cities such as Long jobs of Iwo people-both the tJgher demand for consulltn double the traffic the city to lire consultants on a higher salaries and stock oP Beech,which has 35 openings em hdEneering and the public re- from cities. er9 salary inuma ' la to project basis,it Is rare for can. lions." in its engineering department, lotions. "Due to the good acomin! g �' sultants to be hired on as staff. Five years ago, civil mgt- and Anaheim, which has eight While many tides are being money has been available to c l,et a Consultant to "It's a very tight job mar- neering was the most popular openings, are bypassing some hit in the wager,local consult- ties to build new infrastrm erform ket," said City Administrator engineering program for on. appikation requirements to ing fume we capitalizing on tares)'said Repke. n the job. Ray Silver,adding that the city dergraduates at UCL last fag, help attract employees. the situation. Repke acknowledges he,to has failed in three separate only 196 students wereearofled "I think we should focus Santa Ana-based Norris is feeling the squeeze.His fin a))JIMMY CHAP recruiting attempts to fill the in civil engineering, a 30 vver- more on recruiting,"said Hun- Repke Inc.,a planing and de, is constantly looking for eng Tlx Orange County Register position."It is very hard to her cent decrease. Meanwor, ting[an Beech Councilwoman sign civil engineering foci veers and "continuously pu engineers to come into the pub- computer engineering enroll- Debbie Cook."I get the imprea- with many cities, including this ads out but competition- HUNTINGTON BEACH — ilc sector when there is more menl has shot up 600 percent. sion that our Public Winks De- Huntington Beach, as clients, very keen." Unable to fig city staff post. money offered in the private Mm cities in Southern Cali- partment is working to the has tripled its revenue over the lions because of a nationwide sector." fo is con se or a maximum level without the past five years.Warren Repke, ► Contact Chai al p14j 445,02 shortage of engineers, Hun- i Huntin tan small on o ue en - manpower...We would save a principal of the fun,attributes idu0notes.fxsdam.mm tinglon Beachhas takenthe un- Beat and of necrs.t us avmga mug tune lot of money a we worked on usual route of paying a tempo merncy� ornia have been tmdsne q leo�y� finding someone to fill the posh rary consultant a hefty fee to affected by the engineer short- Buena 1 ark mucous, w iTe don." slay and work for nvo years as age w c menyi iri T experts snags in negotiations to hive a tempo Engineers such as Brohard, Ilre clt}vs traffic manager. [ems I�r- nary miumItant to handle the who officials say is best quel- The City Council agreed to tyent rate and the M aruri traffic management duties for tried as handle me design and pay double the usual trafac art of c the city,said they expect a du- planning of traffic-related pro manager's salary-or$192,ODD As a result, city officials are n year - for Tom Brohard to struggling to hire qualified ---- work a minimum of three days people and consequently pay- a week and handle everything ing more for consultants to from signal design to traffic handle project needs. control. "Over the years, there has City officials'renewed the been a growing interest in the contract with Brohard,who al- computer area," said Jan ready worked part-time as Scherfia chairman of the civil traffic manager for the past engineering deper cent at two years,because they could University of California, Ir. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Page# Date Subject Orange County Register �'ecticm oc /ool Our cities must take responsibility . for ,power and .pollution s a resident of southeast Hw[mgton Beach'I am umquety'situated m be- tween the M Coip- power phmt and the Or- ange Courty Sanrurtion District sew- age treatment Phu¢{"Electricalr� fir !e,' CcmtnenlBry�Jaa 281.I find"d'gurte in?etegtirtg that st, many area resde�tts,as well as Oily Cotm a are e„oauP�ntg about the Power plant and�ihe:pmposea re-poweri f dsip generators. . Wasnk that powerplant there long before the'hotumg tractswere'built amund it and before most c irreut Huatiogtou Beach residents moved here?. ETialrincredible is that this op that the'r'e.Powered;gM rteretbrsWv produce 90 percent less c th eYsaPonuesn Powera pew of possibly dm,mg m treated wastewater from the saniteRonplanes outfall pipe-If this were ti,e rase,wouldn't we have had;pollution and beach clo- surer frequently during the past threederades in which the san- imtim and power plants have co-ex- isted? I think the real problem here is tighter measurement standards and a continuous influx of people into Orange County,which is putting ex- tra demand on our systems.If we are all going to live here happily ever after,then we all need to ac- cept our burden of hosting and liv- ing peaceably with entities that serve the greater good of all,this in- cludes powedsanitation plants,land- fills and airports. T.L Morgan Huntington Beach Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page# Date Sub ct M-1 i- � �eSer �ptr pi�rc r� TOPICS OF INTEREST COURTS Reservoir plan sparks lawsuit Defend the Bay,a nonprofit environmental group focused on Newport Bay-sued the it- vine Ranch Water District on Wednesday in Orange County Superior Court. The lawsuit alleges the dis- trict did not adequately study the.environmental impacts of restoring the nowcmpty San Joaquin Reservoir to hold up to 1 billion gallons of treated wastewater before the district approved the project last month Bob Caustin,director of Dc fend. Uha,Bay,.40d,nitragen. phosphorus and. other Chem icals found in treated sewage could be harmful to the bay's ecosystem. The suit asks that work on the reservoir be sus- pended until a full envuvu, mental study is done, . John Withers, a district board member,said the reseo- voter is needed 'Tee science clearly sup ports the project," Withers said. 'Seasonal storage reser- voirs are garden variety." —Iathm Cabin (714)79660% ENVIRONMENT AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING February 28, 2001 —7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda,or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com, Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tern, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 02/28/01 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2001 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vole, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/01 01/31/01 Totals $3,400,711.30 $11,236,329.16 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Negligence, Nuisance, and Waste, Michael Rezvan, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 NL10525, in connection with Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 335R, and refer to District's contractor, Barnard Construction Company, Inc., St. Paul Insurance Companies, and General Counsel, to appear and defend the interests of the District. 02/28/01 Page 3 b. (1) Receive and file petition from Michael Hughes requesting annexation of 1.12 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District at the intersection of Amapola Avenue and Ranch Wood Trail in the City of Orange; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-05, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-19— Hughes Annexation). C. (1)Approve the purchase of real property located at 810 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, California at an amount not to exceed $540,000; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$600,000 for Rehabilitation of the "A' Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, for a total project budget of$2,848,000. d. Approve an easement appraisal procedure for the acquisition of private easements in connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re February 28,2001 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2001 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re February 7, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7, 2001 to be filed. C. 1) Authorize a total budget for an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for consulting service agreements for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; 2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts with government agencies, universities and consulting companies qualified to carry out those contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; 3) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with the United States Geological Survey(USGS) to conduct all tasks associated with the design, installation, and collection of physical oceanographic data from fixed oceanographic moorings in an amount not to exceed $500,000; and 4) Direct staff to request County of Orange to assist in the funding of the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85. 02/28/01 Page 4 d. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract with BP Energy Company for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28, ending July 31, 2001, providing for an increase of$1,680,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,810,000. e. 1) Establish a budget of$480,000 for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297); 2)Adopt Resolution No. 01-06, authorizing specifications calling for a specific make and model of equipment in order that a field test may be conducted to determine the product's suitability for future use as authorized by California public Contract Code Section 3400(b); and 3) Authorize the Purchasing Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source contract with US Filter Envirex for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297), for an amount not to exceed $360,000. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re February 1, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 1, 2001 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132.39,with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$221,581 and 30 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,549,632. d. Accept Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-20, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. to conduct a Value Engineering workshop and prepare a Value Engineering study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $57,759. f. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$222,500 for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, for a total project budget of $1,124,500; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc. for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, for an amount not to exceed $897,339. g. (1) Establish a budget of$354,815 for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25.6; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25-6, for an amount not to exceed $294,815. 02/28/01 Page 5 h. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design engineering services for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, for an additional amount of $54,652, increasing the total amount not to exceed $112,237. I. Approve continuing the original defined Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, as recommended by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, and disapprove the Irvine Ranch Water District alternate phasing proposal. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the February 14, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 14, 2001 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2001. d. Receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 2000. e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. f. Receive, file and approve the Five-Year Staffing and Business Plan, fiscal year 2000-01 to 2004-05, as approved unanimously by the OMTS and PDC Committees. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re January 29, 2001 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 29, 2001 to be filed. 02/28/01 Page 6 16. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary b. Reconvene in regular session c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 17, Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 18. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 19. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 G:Ww me�gnW S.rd AgerAs 01 Board Ag�1 spend ,. U 4 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING JANUARY 24, 2001 A ITAl� O Zv cO1 c 0 ti 9 C,2> T�aQ H ENV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 01/24/01 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on January 24, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., in the Districfs Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrede, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green, Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carroao Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Adene Schafer X John M. Gullizson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Mike Ward X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan vacant X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Mark A. Murphy vacant X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Peer Swan Darryl Miller Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Paula Zeller, Ingrid Hellebrand; Chuck Winsor, Dan Tremblay; Ken Ramey; Dennis May; Doug Cook; Ron Wade; Ted Mauter; Dale Sparks; John Linder, Sonja Wassgren; Mike Moore; Paul Mitchell; Simon Watson OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Jan Vandersloot; Eileen Murphy; Joey Racano Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 01/24/01 3. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: (*Mayor) City/Aaencv Active Director Alternate Director Brea Roy Moore' Marty Simonoff Buena Park Gerald N. Sigler Jim Dow Fountain Valley Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall* Newport Beach Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams' Tustin Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley' PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Joey Racano spoke to the Directors of his favorable impression of the District from his recent tour of the facilities and the cooperation of staff to explain District operations. He encouraged the District to be overly cautious with the treated effluent going through the outfall and strongly urged the District to not reduce secondary treatment through the 301(h) waiver. Mr. Jan Vandersloot of Newport Beach spoke to the Directors and urged the Directors not to request a 301(h) waiver for secondary treatment to the ocean outfall in the year 2002. Mr. Doug Korthof of Seal Beach also spoke to the Directors and expressed concern about the crisis the ocean and ecosystem is undergoing, in particular with the lack of kelp beds and sea otter population and urged the Directors to not go forward with the request for a 301(h)waiver. Ms. Eileen Murphy of Huntington Beach also spoke to the Directors and urged the Directors not to request a waiver for secondary treatment to the ocean outfall. Mr. Dean Albright of Huntington Beach spoke to the directors regarding his concerns with the District pursuing a renewal of the 301(h)waiver permit and the acceptance/treatment of water from Stringfellow. Blake Anderson, General Manager, suggested that those making public comments remain for his presentation on the projects and issues the District would be working on during the 2001 year. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eclkenrode reported the New Directors' Orientation would be held on Saturday, February 10. He strongly encouraged all new Directors and their alternates to attend. Spouses were invited to attend as well as existing Directors. It was then announced that Director Shirley McCracken was appointed Chair of the Finance. Administration and Human Resources Committee. It was also announced that all of the standing committees would meet on their regularly-scheduled days in February. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 01/24/01 Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that if they left the Board Room during the meeting for conflict of interest or similar purposes during a vote, they must notify the Board Secretary or other minute taker that their action should be reflected in the minutes. Otherwise, temporarily leaving the room will not be noted in the minutes. Future meetings on the Groundwater Replenishment System were announced as follows: January 29 at 5:30 p.m. Joint Cooperative Committee at Orange County Water District March 3 at 8:00 a.m. Orange County Sanitation District/Orange County Water District Workshop at the Orange County Water District March 19 at 5:30 p.m. Joint Cooperative Committee at Orange County Water District March 28 at 6:30 p.m. Joint Meeting w/Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District to consider the go/no go decision on the GWRS project at Orange County Sanitation District Board Room The District received three regional awards from the California Water Environment Association (CWEA). The District was selected for the Large Plant of the Year Award, Ingrid Hellebrand was honored with the Public Education Award, and Ron Wade was honored with Treatment Plant Supervisor of the Year Award. The winners were selected from the 30 agencies and 400 regional members of the organization. Service awards were then presented to the following employees for their many years of service: Dennis May—35 years; Ron Parker—30 years; Ken Ramey—25 years; Dan Tremblay—25 years; Paul Mitchell—25 years; and, Bob Dolan—20 years. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, gave a presentation on what is ahead for the District in 2001, which covered ocean discharge quality issues, urban runoff, energy costs, biosolids management, water reclamation, increasing regulation, and new governmental standards. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that an author is being sought to sponsor a statute in the state legislature that would authorize land application of biosolids as a state-wide interest. Senator Polanco's bill that did not have passage in the Assembly last year prohibited counties from banning land application of biosolids. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 01/24/01 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held December 20, 2000 be deemed approved, as mailed. Directors Blake, Silva, Kawashima and Krom abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and"B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/00 12/31/00 Totals $6,435,531.11 $6,178,080.13 Director Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 31969. CONSENT CALENDAR 9 a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Alphonzo C. Garland v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., United States District Court Case No. SACV-00-1267DOC (Eex), and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Gerald and Barbara Larson requesting annexation of.50 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Old Ranch Road and Country Hill Road Drive in the City of Anaheim; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-01, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-10—Larson Annexation). C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Stuart and Brenda Galantine requesting annexation of.50 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District at the intersection of Clark Street and Randall Street in the City of Orange; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-02, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-12-Galantine Annexation). d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from owners requesting annexation of 5.56 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of East Lemon Heights Drive and LaCuesta Drive in the unincorpoated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01- 03, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-17- Seashore Annexation). Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 0124/01 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from George Adams requesting annexation of 10.13 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Villa Park Road and Linda Vista Street in the unincorporated area of Orange County; (2) Waive annexation fees for 3.45 acres of the proposed 10.13 acres to be annexed; and (3)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-04, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-18—Oak Ridge Annexation). NON-CONSENT CALENDAR -11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the January 24, 2001 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 20, 2000 to be filed. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 2000. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve modifications to the Scope of Work for Cooperative Project Contracts CP-9910 (City of La Habra) and CP-9911 (City of Seal Beach) related to the length of the sewer line; (2)Approve an additional time extension of 6 months for CP-9914 (City of Garden Grove) and CP-9909 (City of Placentia); (3)Authorize the General Manager to approve changes in the types of project elements in the Scope of Work within Cooperative Project agreements without impacts to the overall project budget; and (4)Authorize the General Manager to require agencies to resubmit their applications for funding request if the contract needs to be extended beyond two time extensions. 14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute Utility Agreement No.12-UT-674 with the State of California Department of Transportation to adjust nine manhole covers to grade on Park Coast Highway, from Beach Boulevard to Golden West Street in the City of Huntington Beach, in an estimated amount not to exceed $3,600. 15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute an Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach and Mayer Financial, LP, a California Limited Partnership, allowing the City and Mayer Financial, LP, to construct and maintain a pedestrian landing and pedestrian overpass bridge over and upon an existing Orange County Sanitation District trunk sewer and easement at no cost to the District. 16. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-14, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Board of Directors' Compensation, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 91 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated December 20, 2000. General Counsel gave a brief report on the proposed ordinance. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 01/24/01 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file written comments received from Patricia L. Campbell. OPEN HEARING: The Chair declared the hearing opened at 8:56 p.m. CLOSE HEARING: The Chair declared the hearing closed at 8:57 p.m. Directors entered into discussion regarding the proposed ordinance. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-14, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Board of Directors' Compensation, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 98-3, by ti8e only, and waive reading of entire Ordinance. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-14,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Board of Directors' Compensation, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 98-3. Directors Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Guy Carroao; John M. Gullixson; Alice B. Jempsa; Tony Kawashima; Beth Krom; Mark Leyes; Mark A. Murphy; Jim Silva; and Peer A. Swan opposed. 17. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on January 8,2001. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on December 18, 2000 and January 8,2001 to be filed. A discussion was entered into regarding the release of the draft financial report being prepared by the consultant, Public Resources Advisory Group. The Steering Committee had determined the release of this document should be held until the report was final. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Release draft financial documents being prepared by the consultant, Public Advisory Resources Group, to those directors who request the draft document 18. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 9:34 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss Agenda Item No. 18 (a)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No.18(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: Al 9:40 p.m.,the Board reconvened in regular session. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 01/24/01 ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Secretary f e Board Di ctors of Orange County Sanita n District G1wp.dtMagendMBoard Minatea12001 Board Minutesa72401.doc Claims Paid From 12/01/00 to 12115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 31947 Barclays Bank PLC 6 83,930.70 COP Letter of Credit 31948 RPI/Bio Gro 49.365.46 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 31949 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 35,361.74 Engineering Services J-77 31950 Blue Cross of California 185,768.46 Medical Insurance Premium 31951 Brown&Caldwell 107,472.99 Engineering Service Pl37 31952 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 214,148.12 Natural Gas-Spec. No.9900-28 31953 Carollo Engineers 60,277.80 Professional Services-P1-43,P2-50, P2-66 31954 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 214.095.87 Ferric Chloride MO9-27.95 31955 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 46.228.25 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 31956 City of Newport Beech 58,100.00 Construction Services J-73-Cooperative Projects Reimbursement Program 31957 Oracle Corp 38,508.92 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 31958 Orange County Sanitation District 177,306.48 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 31959 Pelnewebber Incorporated 82.073.71 COP Remarketing Agreement 31960 Persons Engineering Science,Inc. 484,007.82 Engineering Services J42 31961 Projects Partners 83,167.02 Temporary Employment Services 31962 Realtime Systems Corporation 64,580.00 Professional Services-Supervisory Control&Dan Acquaition Sofhvare Upgrade 31963 Southern California Edison 59.590.88 Power 31964 Tule Ranch/Megan Farms 84,172.82 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 31965 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 71,783.39 Generators-J-33-1 31956 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 52,368.34 Engineering Service J67 31967 Western States Chemical, Inc. 59,499.61 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95 31968 The Yakima Company 34,826.04 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 31969 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 333.704.77 Construction 338-1 31970 Ken Thompson, Inc. 836,181.92 Construction 11.17.3& 11.20 31971 Margate Construction,Inc. 85,660.00 Construction SP2000-2-Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Pit.2 31972 Union Bank of California 92.909.10 Construction 11-17.3,Retention 31973 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 181.34 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 31974 Aceutite Fasteners,Inc. 176.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31075 Action Instruments 459.88 Electrical Supplies 31976 Advanced Technology Service 1,808.25 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31977 Aearo Company 1,137.00 Safety Supplies 31978 Air Cold Supply 58.77 Air Conditioner Supplies 31979 Air Liquids America Corp. 194.45 Specially Gasses 31980 Alrbome Express 44.72 Air Freight 31901 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1.322.31 Safely Supplies 31982 American Airlines 2,356.00 Travel Services 31983 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 31984 Appleone Employment Service 3,676.32 Temporary Employment Services 31985 Arcus Dale Security 204.00 OBsile Beck-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 319W Aurora Data Systems 4,837.15 Safety Training Supplies 31987 Voided Check - 31988 ASTD American Society For Training&Dev. 139.00 Membership 31989 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 36.55 Telephone Service 31990 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,507.30 Long Distance Telephone Service 31991 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,561.64 Cellular Telephone Service Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 12101100 to 12115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31992 AWSI 229.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 31993 Battery Specialties 265.71 Batteries 31994 Biocycle 113.00 Subscription 31995 Brindemon&Associates a,135.00 Professional Services P2-79 31996 Bush&Associates, Inc. 688.00 Surveying Services MO6-25-97 31997 Calif Centrifugal Pump 958.97 Pump Supplies 319M Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 319M Celtrol, Inc. 4,517.26 Plumbing Pens&Supplies 32000 Carl R. Nelson, P.E. 1,030.00 Engineering Consultant 241 32001 Carollo Engineers 989.86 Professional Services J-39 32002 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 24.802.70 Engineering Services P2-62&Dairy Washwater Pilot Project 32003 City of Fountain Valley 890.00 Fire Permit 32004 Compressor Components Of California 15,100.10 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 32005 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc, 2.064.74 Electrical Supplies 32006 Converse Consultants 6.350.00 Consulting Service 11-20 32007 Corporate Express 1,036.36 Office Supplies 32MB County Wholesale Electric Co. 877.30 Electrical Supplies 320D9 Crane America Services, Inc. 1.634.41 Crane Services 32010 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 1,136.65 CCTV Sewer Inspection&Pipe Cleaning 32011 Computational Systems,Inc.(CSI) 1.600.00 VlbraBan Analysis Service 32012 CWEA Membership 120.00 Membership 32013 Dapper Tire Co. 581.95 Truck Tires 32014 David's Tree Service 10,400.00 Tree Malnt.Service 32015 Delta Packaging Products,Inc. 201.19 Lab Supplies 32016 DeZudk C/O Misco/SoulhWeet 2,904.94 Valves 32017 Domoff,Joseph 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32018 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 550.69 Paint Supplies 32019 DDB Engineering.Inc. 13,015.00 Temporary Employment Services 32020 DGA Consultants,Inc. 5.328.00 Surveying Services MO B-8-94 32021 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 250.18 Electrical Supplies 32022 Norman Eckemade 402,26 Meeting/Traintng Expense Reimbursement 32023 Eceno Fence Company 1,260.00 Fence Removal&Gate Installation C Pit.a1 32024 Electra-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32025 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 32026 Evans, Danny 4,425.00 Computer Service Agreement-Software 32027 Sandra S. Fazio, DC 630.33 Furniture 32028 FedEx Corporation 83.66 Air Freight 32029 Filter Supply Company 2,758.67 Filters 32030 Jam Finley 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32031 First American Reel Estate Solutions 418.60 Orange County Property Information Subscription 32032 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 790.17 Lab Supplies 32033 Thomas M.Flanagan 167.98 Meeting/Treming Expense Reimbursement 32034 Flat and Ventral.Inc. 492.00 Concrete Cutting 32035 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1.323.48 Pump Supplies 32036 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 359.00 Truck Wash Tickets 32037 Franklin Covey 237.24 Office Supplies Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 12/01100 to 12/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32038 Frye Electronics 149.27 Computer Supplies ' 32039 City of Fullerton 124.53 Water Use 32040 FM International,Inc. 7,375.68 Professional Services J-25-1 32041 Ganahl Lumber Company 703.13 Lumber/Hardware - 32042 Glerlich-Mitchell,Ina 205.66 Bait Filler Press Supplies 32043 WW Grainger, Ino, 4,378.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32044 Grating Paci0c, Ina 1,908.00 Fiberglass Grating 32045 Graybar Electric Company 727.73 Electrical Supplies 32046 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1.212.96 Janitorial Supplies 32047 Verizon California 1,643.52 Telephone Services 32048 Hardy Diagnostics 52.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 32049 Harold Primrose Ice 98.00 loe For Samples 32050 Hero's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 177.75 Meeting Expenses 32051 Hllli,Inc. 418.62 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32052 Home Depot 211.02 Small Hardware 32053 Hub Auto Supply 287.78 Truck Parts 32054 City of Huntington Beach 17.144.44 Water Use 32055 Huntington Supply Co.,Inc. 439.92 Hardware, Repairs&Maintenance Materiels 32056 Industrial Distribution Group 4,555.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32057 Industrial Metal Supply 1,067.94 Metal 32058 InterNational Electrical Testing Assoc. 252.00 Publication 32059 Report on Managing HR Information System 247.95 Subscription 32060 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Ina 240.00 Misc.Construction 3-35R-Recover Pipe 32061 Jaye Catering 420.69 Meeting Expenses 32062 Jensen Instrument Co. 581.43 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 32083 Johnstone Supply 150.06 Electrical Supplies 32084 JWC Environmental 5,147.23 Mechanical Maintenance 32065 Karen Monaco&Associates 6.187.50 FIS Support Services 32066 Kelly Paper 107.93 Paper 32067 Kings County Fan Bureau 175.00 Membership 32068 Lab Support 10,528.51 Temporary Employment Services 32069 Labeltronix 739.33 Office Supplies 32070 Law Of loee of Kinkle,Rodger&Spriggs 2,980.90 Legal Services-Claim of Than vs.Kovace 32071 Lee&Ro,Inc. 10,336.14 Professional Services 5.49,50,51 &52 32072 Luod's 95.00 Meeting Expense 32073 MerVac Electronics 4505 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32074 Mec Analytical System 13,860.50 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 32075 Medlin Controls Co. 469.78 Instrument Supplies 32076 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,OD0.00 Professional Service-Tub Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 32077 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,798.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32078 Mlllitronice C/O RMB Engineering 75.00 Electrical Supplies 32079 Mission Uniform Service 4,547.39 Uniform Rentals 32060 Morrison&Foerster, L.L.P. 208.44 Legal Services-Restructuring Series 92&93 Documents 32081 National Plant Services, Inc. 7,035.00 Vacuum Truck Services 32082 Neal Supply Co. 3.640.87 Plumbing Supplies 32063 NeWereant of Silicone Valley 19.950.84 Security System Maintenance Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 12/01/00 to 12il Sf00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32084 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,903.10 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 32085 Ninyo&Moore Corporate A counting 8.283.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO&24-98 32086 Norcel Controls Incorporated 1.028.70 Instrument Supplies 32087 The Norm Companies 152.00 Mall Delivery Service 32088 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.004.81 Office Supplies 32089 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 18,239.27 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 32090 OnsSource Distributors, Inc. 7.22 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32091 Oracle Corporation-Support/Sales 1,037,62 Software&Hardware 32092 Orange Valve&Filling Company 62.62 Fittings 32093 Orrick, Herrington&SuldiOe 1,000.00 Professional Services-Arbitrage Calculations 32094 Oxygen Service Company 1,528.61 Specialty Gases 32095 OC-ASTD 80.00 Membership 32098 OCB Reprographics 2,523.62 Printing Service-MO1/26/00 32097 Pacific Bell 16.19 Telephone Services 32098 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 32099 Pacific Investment Management Co. 12,704.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 32100 Pacific Mechanical Supply 944.51 Plumbing Supplies 32101 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 12,283.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32102 Parker Supply Company 77.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32103 Parts Unlimited 464.55 Truck Supplies 32104 Peacock,Philip 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32105 Polydyne, Inc. 2.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 32106 Primary Source 6,300.14 Office Furniture 32107 Propipe 975.00 CCTV Sewerline Inspection 32108 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.08 Trash Removal 32109 Ralmn Instrument Co.,Inc. 670.43 Lab Parts&Supplies 32110 Red Wing Shoes 181.88 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 32111 Rick Amour&Associates 4,454.78 Consulting Service-O&M Worker Competency&Training Project 32112 RPM Electric Motors 489.14 Electrical Pans&Supplies 32113 Safety-Kleen 140,00 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 32114 Santa Fe Ind. 370.82 Mechanical Supplies 32115 Schwing Americo, Inc. 385.25 Pump Supplies 32116 Sears Industrial Sales 71.72 Mechanical Supplies 32117 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 396.86 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 32118 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 435.00 Tools/Hardware 32119 Sidu Manufacturing 1.131.49 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 32120 Supelm,Inc. 387.76 Lab Supplies 32121 Sign Industries,Inc. 6,964.44 Directional Signage at Plant 2 32122 Skater,Inc. 15.73 Lab Supplies 32123 Sparklells 1.965.86 Drinking Water/Gaoler Rentals 32124 Spex Cedprep, Inc. 246.33 Lab Supplies 32125 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. 229.86 Janitorial Supplies 32126 Sunset Ford 342.91 Vehicle Supplies 32127 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,566.31 Mechanical Supplies 32128 By Niel.Service,Inc. 816.00 Lab Calibration Service . 32129 SCAOMD 411.60 Rule 222 Filings-Permit Fee Page 4 of 7 - Claims Paid From 12101100 to 12116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32130 SKC-West,Inc. 03.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 32131 SPEC Services,Inc. 1,051.42 Engineering Services J-33-1 32132 STL Sacramento 1,370.00 Lab Analytical Service 32133 Telavere&Richardson 900.00 Consulting Services-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 32134 Team, Inc. 519.36 Valves 32135 The Meniwood Corporation 2,255.15 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 32136 The Orange County Register 1,672.00 Notices&Ads 32137 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 526.51 Mechanical Supplies 32138 Tierta Tractor 21,000.00 Weed Removal Services 32139 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 213.31 Locks&Keys 32140 The Trace Company 243.80 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 32141 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,192.38 Truck Supplies 32142 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 106.00 Lab Services 32143 Teksyslems 2,600.00 Temporary Employment Services 32144 Ultrasonics International Corp 4.172.08 Tools&Supplies 32145 United Parcel Service 499.66 Parcel Services 32146 USFilter Westates Carbon 1,383.21 Instrument Supplies 32147 Vallen Safety Supply Company 888.65 Signs 32148 Varian 67.75 Lab Supplies 32149 Vefltect 5,000.00 Bronze Level Firewall Support 32150 Village Nurseries 43.96 Landscaping Supplies 32151 Vulcan 16.150.61 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 32152 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,506.29 Lab Supplies 32153 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,039.20 Security Guards 32154 Water Education Foundation 250.00 Membership 32155 Water Environment Federation 138.00 Publication 32156 Waters Corporation 99.86 Lab Supplies 32157 WateReuse Association 2,500.00 Membership 32158 Wesanco,Inc. 689.70 Metal 32159 Wesbnark Point Co. 445.88 Painting Supplies 32180 Weston,P. 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32161 WRC,Inc. 800.00 Computer Software 32162 WS Atkins Water 15.000.00 Biosolids Testing Agreement 32163 Xerox Corporation 9,585.60 Copier Leases 32164 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 106.61 Office Supplies 32165 Union Bank of California 14,172.21 Construction 3-38-1,Retention 32166 Layne T. Baroldi 574.31 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 32167 James P.Senzie 507.02 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 32168 Mark H. Kavfamolo 452.79 Meelingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 32169 Robert Ooten 327.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 32170 LEllen Ray 727.77 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 32171 Mahin Talebl 468.44 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 32172 Jane H.Tran 474.44 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 32173 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 975.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 32174 Orange County Sanitation District 1.465.19 Pally Cash Relmb. 32175 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 25,270.00 Misc.Construction Services-Fire Hydrants at Plant 2 8 Vent Piping Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 12101/00 to 12116/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32176 Midway City Sanitary District 325,000.00 Construction J-73 Cooperative Project Program 32177 Orange County Sanitation District 437,247.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 32178 So.Col.Gas Company 36,645.15 Natural Gas 32179 Ascolia Training Company 9,082.74 Information Technology Meeting Registration 32180 ASS Group,Inc. 694.00 Training Supplies 32181 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 49.40 Telephone Service 32162 Court Omer 518.00 Wage Garnishment 321a3 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 32154 Clarence Adams 452.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32185 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 32186 Division of Political Science 60.00 Lab Meeting Registration 32187 DDB Engineering,Inc. 1,972.00 Temporary Employment Services 32188 Element K Journals 62.00 Subscription 32189 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 32190 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 32191 Verizon California 4,609.83 Telephone Services 32192 Home Depot 230.72 Small Hardware 32193 City of Huntington Beech 26.85 Water Use 32194 Information Resources 300.00 Human Resources Service 32105 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 32195 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 32197 JLM Contracting 1,326.75 Construction Service-Pipe Repair 32198 Lew Offices of Kinds,Rodlger&Spriggs 3,000.10 Legal Services-Tren vs.Kovacs 32199 Leine Adot 360.84 Recenclletton User Fee Program 32200 MarVac Electronics 35.93 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32201 William Mazurie 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32202 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 62.52 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 32203 Mocdy's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 32204 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 32205 OCEA 520.10 Dues Deduction 32206 Pacific Bell 15.21 Telephone Services 32207 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 44.00 Freight Charges 32208 Pacific Publishers 282.37 Publication 32209 Court Order 40.D0 Wage Garnishment 32210 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 32211 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 32212 Rockhurat College Continuing Education 27.80 Publication 32213 Rutan&Tucker L.L.P. 8,328.49 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 32214 ShowCaw Corporation 2,963.13 Software Maim. 32215 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 214.23 Toole/Hardware 32216 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana Watershed Group 32217 Southern California Edison 1'815.56 Power 32218 Sunset Ford 715.85 Vehicle Supplies 32219 SWRCB Accounting Office 10,400.00 Annual Fee 32220 The Orange County Register 1,553.78 Notices&Ads 32221 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,427.85 Mechanical Supplies Page 6 of 7 - , Claims Paid From 12/01/00 to 12115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32222 Top Shelf Cleaning Service 3.275.00 Easement Weed Abatement 32223 The Unisource Corporation 84.29 Office Supplies 32224 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 32225 3M Company 900.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration 32226 Angie Anderson 144.47 Meetingryraining Expense Reimbursement 32227 Mark A.Esquer 138.78 MeetingrTralning Expense Reimbursement 32228 Penny M.Kyle 736.19 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 32229 Michael D.Moore 470.40 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants S 5,087,768.79 Payroll Disbursements 21456.21814 Interim Paychecks $ 304,785.10 Annual Leave Payouts 21615-21766 Employee Paychecks 187.896.36 Biweekly Payroll 12/13/00 21767.21774 Interim Paychecks 3,289.86 EMT BOP&Tax Adjustments 55940-56393 Direct Deposit Statements 700,219.16 Biweekly Payroll 1 21/1 310 0 Total Payroll Disbursements If 1,196,190.48 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Manhattan Bank $ 6,261.99 November Swap Payment on Series 2000"A"Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 127,047.90 November Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 18.261.95 November Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 151,571.84 Total Claims Paid 12/01100-12/16/00 $ 8,435,531.11 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 12116/00 to 12131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 32230 American Express It 26,174.38 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 32231 RPI/Bio Gro 40,105.56 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 32232 Boyle Engineering Corporation 88,055.62 Engineering Services 231,2-60.1-24&3.38-1 32233 Brawn&Caldwell 64,480.51 Engineering Services P137 32234 Carollo Engineers 56,245.66 Engineering Services J-254 32235 Computenzed Facility Integration 128,326.72 Engineering Service J-25-1 32236 CH2MHill 40,016.10 Engineering Service J-714 32237 Delta Dental 47,650.03 Dental Insurance Plan 32238 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 38,130.00 Mist Construction Services-5.33-2&Tunnels Safety Railing 32239 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28,524A9 Medical Insurance Premium 32240 Kemlmn Pacific,Ina 94,644.37 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 32241 Network Catalyst,Inc. 27.249.77 Computers-5 32242 Orange County Water District 128.294.40 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 32243 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 168.920.60 Engineering Services J-35-1 32244 Polydyne,Inc. 53.055.01 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 32245 Power Lift Corporation 30,695.82 (1)Caterpillar&(1)Lift Truck 32246 Projects Partners 25,009.33 Temporary Employment Services 32247 Schwing America,Inc. 54,105.96 Pump Supplies 32248 Senior Flexonics, Inc. 37,818.60 Pump Assembly,Supplies&Equipment 32249 Silo Financial Group, Inc. 42,728.72 Software Maintenance 32250 South Coast Environmental Co. 27,408.52 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 32251 Southern California Edison 49,558.78 Power 32252 The Lewis Group 32.670.52 Consulting Service-Project Management Process 32253 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 93,609.89 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 32254 Vulcan 25,924.58 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 32255 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 45,824.10 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 32266 J W Contracting Corporation 495,126.00 Construction P2-60 32257 Margate Contraction,Inc 230,326.00 Construction P239 32258 Olsson Construction,Inc. 192.478.00 Construction J52&SP 200041 32259 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 91,262.35 Construction P146-2 8 J-53 32260 Union Bank of California 215,923.00 Contraction P250 32261 Urbantec Engineering, Inc. 34.200.00 Construction J-66 32262 Mladen Buntich Constr.Co. 550,000.00 Construction 338-3 32263 Orange County Sanitation District 40,322.60 Worker's Comp.Relmb. 32264 Accident Photo Pak 2,693.75 Risk Management Photo Supplies 32265 Acopian Technical Company 2,691.15 Electrical Supplies 32266 Action Instruments 1,057.00 Electrical Supplies 32267 Advanced Calibration Designs,Inc. 242.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32268 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 6,195.63 Emissions Monitoring Systems Parts&Supplies 32269 Advanced Technology Service 1,209.25 Electrical Pans&Supplies 32270 Agilent Technologies,Inc 1,019.73 Lab Repairs&Maintenance Service 32271 Air Liquide America Corp. 987.18 Specialty Gasses 32272 Air Products&Chemicals 24,136.35 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 32273 Airborne Express 44.46 Air Freight 32274 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 4,815.15 Safety Supplies&Tools Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid From 12/16100 to 12/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32275 Afta-Robbins, Inc. 160.35 Instrument Supplies 32276 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 685.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 32277 Norma J.Anthony 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32278 Appleone Employment Service 1,731.90 Temporary Employment Services 32279 Applied Industrial Technology 1,183.16 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 32280 Ark Construction Company 10.000.00 Construction-Cleaning Tunnels 32281 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 539.00 Vacuum Truck Services 32282 Ashbrook Corporation 3,986.25 Mechanical Equipment, Parts 8 Supplies 32283 Automatic Timing 8 Controls 132.45 Digilec Printer Repair 32294 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 24.24 Plaques 32285 ASL Consulting Engineers 11.349.86 Professional Services 11-22 32286 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 169.91 Telephone Service 32287 Vito Barbieri 136.37 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32288 Basler Electric Company 1,812.34 Electrical Supplies 32289 BiaMedeux Vitek, Inc. 518.34 Lab Supplies 32290 BloSphericel Instruments, Inc. 146.86 Instrument Maint. 32291 Brinderson 8 Associates 13,957.10 Professional Services P2-79 32292 Bureau of Business Practice 168.95 Publication 32293 Burke Engineering Co. 1,380.75 Electrical Supplies 32294 Joseph Burke(Trust Fund) 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32285 California Automatic Gate 100.00 Service Agreement 32296 Southern California Marine Institute 1,732.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 32297 Cameron Welding Supply 504.78 Welding Supplies 32298 Carl Warren 8 Co. 552.73 Insurance Claims Administrator 32299 Ceiloots Air Pollution Control 1,700.72 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 32300 Rita Charleswanh 1.044.29 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32301 Chlor-Service,Inc. 2,503.85 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 32302 City of Fountain Valley 89.00 Fire Permit 32303 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 913.25 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 32304 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 9,380.59 Professional Services-Communication,Safety 8 Emerg. Response Procedures 32305 Compressor Components Of California 1,294.43 Mechanical Parts B Supplies 32308 Voided Check - 32307 Converse Consultants 2,180.06 Consulting Services P2-60 32308 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 32309 Corporate Express 1,693.89 Office Supplies 32310 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,323.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 32311 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,785.00 Melnl.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base, Handheld B Vehicle Radios 32312 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3.518.89 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 32313 Crane America Services,Inc. 3,916.25 Crane Services 32314 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 32315 Cydus Envirosystems, Inc. 3,230.85 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 32316 Cytec Industries 14,593.50 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 32317 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 1,247.85 CCTV Sewer Inspection 32318 CSMFO 2001 Annual Conference 1,290.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 32319 Ralph Darker 134.40 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32320 Arvin Dantema 222.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid From 12/16/00 to 12131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32321 Sergio Davits 704.67 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32322 Del Mar Analytical 516.00 Biosolids Analysis 32323 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 1.291.93 Lab Server Maintenance Agreement 32324 DeZudk C/O Mlscc/SouthWest 3.906.71 Valves 32325 Diamond H Recognition 959.80 Employee Service Awards 32326 Dynalco Corp 130.50 Instrument Pens&Supplies 32327 DDB Engineering, Inc. 3,198.00 Temporary Employment Services 32328 DGA Consultants,Inc. 4,898.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 32329 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 120.57 Electrical Supplies 32330 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 160.00 Medical Screening 32331 BOC Edwards 1,246.06 Rebuilt Vacuum Pump 32332 Enchanter,Ina 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 32333 Environmental Resource Associetlon 127.80 Lab Supplies 32334 Environmental Date Solutions Group 6.000.00 Professional Servlcos-Alr Quality Info,Mgmt.Sys. Implementation Project 32335 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 534.22 Maint.Service Agreement 32336 FedEz Corporation 184.13 Air Freight 32337 Filter Supply Company 62.84 Filters 32338 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,551.49 Lab Supplies 32339 Jack Fletcher 745.07 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32340 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1,869.43 Pump Supplies 32341 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 19,305.20 Long-Tenn Disability Insurance Premium 32342 Fountain Valley Camera 16.32 Photo Supplies 32343 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 267.94 Truck Wash Tickets 32344 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 161.03 Paint Supplies 32345 Franklin Covey 668.21 Office Supplies 32346 Lyle Frederickson 374.79 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32347 Fry's Electronics 1,563.19 Computer Supplies 32348 Full Spectrum Analytccs,Ina 1,319.34 Lab Instrument Service 32349 FM International,Inc. 6,212.80 Professional Services J-25.1 32350 Ganahl Lumber Company 164.24 Lumber/Hardware 32351 Thomas Gates 777.85 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32352 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 6,270.12 Belt Filter Press Supplies 32353 Government Finance Officers,Association 55.00 Subscription 32354 WW Grainger, Inc. 1,850.08 Mechanical&Electrical Pans&Supplies 32355 Jeff Gray 275.80 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32356 Graybar Electric Company 1,560.33 Electrical Supplies 32357 GPM Pumps,Inc. 6.558.20 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 32358 Verzon California 1.072.59 Telephone Services 32359 Hanker Equipment Company 4,155.48 Truck Supplies 32360 Hach Company 273.02 Lab Supplies 32361 Ronald Hahn 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32362 Rosa Harbord 569.20 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32363 Harold Primrose Ice 46.D0 Ice For Samples 32364 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,223.25 Plumbing Supplies 32365 Ernest Harvey 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32366 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 4,840.85 Engine Generator Control Supplies Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid From 12/16100 to 12/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32367 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 47.60 Meeting Expenses 32368 Hal Hibbard 699.50 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32369 HIM,Inc. 1,799.91 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32370 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 313.31 Compressor Parts 32371 Home Depot 660.48 Small Hardware 32372 Hopkins Technical Products 233.76 Pump Supplies 32373 Horizon Technology 62.10 Lab Supplies 32374 Idus Consulting,L.L.C. 5.072.50 Records Management Program 32375 Idexx 4,008.30 Lab Supplies 32376 Imaging Plus,Inc 895.63 Printing Service 32377 Industrial Distribution Group 1,913.27 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 32378 Industrial Environmental Coalition of OC 50.00 Communications Meeting Registration 32379 Industrial Metal Supply 1,527.30 Metal&Plumbing Parts&Supplies 32380 Oak Faboo/Industrial Steam 376.00 Pump Supplies 32381 Infinity Technology USA 1.445.47 Computer Supplies 32382 Irvine Ranch Water District 51.30 Water Use 32383 IBM Corp. 6,076.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 32384 IBM Corporation 369.89 IBM AS140D Upgrade 32385 Berton Instrument Systems, L.L.C. 140.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32386 Jays Catering 261.30 Meeting Expenses 32387 Jensen Instrument Co. 808.11 Instrument Supplies 32388 Jim's Suspension Service 50.00 Truck Repairs 32389 Karen Monaco&Associates 5,437.50 FIS Support Services 32390 Kems Car Wash, Inc. 614.31 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32391 Kensington Electronics 444.02 Electrical Supplies 32392 Kerry Consulting Group 539.81 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 32393 James Kepner 37.83 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32394 Knowledge Point 2.413.13 Software Mainl, 32395 Lab Support 1,812.60 Temporary Employment Services 32396 Labeltronix 167.97 Office Supplies 32397 La Mode Chemical Products 07.21 Chemicals 32398 League Of CA Cities 95.00 Publication 32399 Lexis-Nexls 106.70 Books&Publications 32400 Gerald R.Jones 10,240.30 Professional Service-DART NO 9-22.99 32401 Liquid Handling Systems 100.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 32402 Local Agency Formation Commission 2,350.00 Annexation Fee 32403 Lusvv-Cal $Met Printing 32404 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 5,518.76 Engineering Services P1-66 32405 MarVac Electronics 89.27 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32406 Matt Chlor,Inc. 1,612.29 Valves 32407 Timothy Mayeda 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32408 McMaster-Gaff Supply Co. 4,114.25 Tools&Supplies 32409 Measurement Variables,Inc. 748.64 Electrical Supplies 32410 Meo Analytical System 6,100.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 32411 Medlin Controls Co. 638.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32412 Mettler-Toledo 3,824.75 Win Bridge Standard Software Update Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid From 12116100 to 12/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32413 Mid-West Associates 12.074.72 Pump Supplies 32414 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 13.196.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32415 Alice Miller 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32416 Kimberly A.Miller 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32417 Mission Uniform Service 4,031.95 Uniform Rentals 32418 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,166.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32419 Kathy Monson 92.26 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32420 MotoPhoto 49.18 Photographic Services 32421 MAP 12,315.00 Management Consulting Service 32422 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,011.87 Maps&Pens 32423 MRO Technology 396.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Conveyor Belt 32424 MSA Instrument Division 254.54 Instrument Maint.Services 32425 National Plant Services,Inc. 8,322.50 Vacuum Truck Services 32426 Neal Supply Co. 232.74 Plumbing Supplies 32427 John Newham 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32428 City of Newport Beach 11.37 Water Use 32429 NewBasis 365.91 Hardscape Supplies 32430 Nic key Petroleum Co.,Inc. 395A7 Lubdca VDiesel Fuel 32431 Nimyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,811.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 32432 Tim O'Donnell 46.13 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32433 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,918.42 Office Supplies 32434 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 5,207.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32435 Orange County Business Council 70.00 Communications Meeting Registration 32436 Orange County Forum 150.00 Membership 32437 Oxygen Service Company 2,146.68 Specially Gases 32438 OCB Reprographics 609A8 Printing Service-MO 126/00 32439 Pace-Butler Corp 250.00 AS1400 Printer Repairs 32440 Pacific Bell 1,112.80 Telephone Services 32441 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 32442 Pacific Gulf Properties 2,363.70 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32443 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,163.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32444 Pacific Pans and Controls, Inc. 981.11 Electrical Supplies 32445 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 191.03 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 32446 Pagenet 2,412.26 Paging Services 32447 Parker Supply Company 9,938.21 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 32448 Parts Unlimited 107.74 Truck Supplies 32449 Patriot Video Productions 335.96 Video Taping Services 32450 Plan Bak 59.56 Stationery Supplies 32451 Primary Source 310.62 Office Furniture 32452 Propipe 1,596.84 CCTV Sewedine Inspection 32453 Quest Software 517.20 Maintenance Agreement 32454 Quest,J.D.Edwards Users Group 1,OD0.00 Membership 32455 COS, LLC. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 32456 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.96 Trash Removal 32457 Rainin Instrument Co..Inc. 190.82 Lab Supplies 32458 Voided Check - - Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid From 12/16100 to 12131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32459 Reliastar 18,844.26 Employee Medical Health Premium 32460 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,988.78 Life Insurance Premium 32461 Henry Rodriguez 623.32 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32462 RPM Electric Motors 3,081.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32463 RS Hughes Co, Inc 352.68 Paint Supplies 32464 Safety-Kleen 2,042.50 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 32465 Victor Salinas 211.93 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32466 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 24.090.00 Construction-Sewer Line Cleaning&Manhole Rehabilitation 32467 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1,048.26 Specially Gases 32468 Second-Sun 23.27 Light Fixtures 32469 Kathy Shepherd 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32470 Richard Shinto 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32471 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,093.24 Tools/Hardware 32472 Sievers Instruments 680.75 Lab Supplies 32473 Supelco,Inc. 402.66 Lab Supplies 32474 Sow-Lynch Corp. 506.51 Janitorial Supplies 32475 Chris Sousa 598.28 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32476 South Coast Water 190.00 Water System Repairs&Maintenance 32477 ND Speding 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32478 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 80.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32479 Strata Intemational,Inc. 605.46 Chemicals 32480 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 354.00 Landscape Maintenance-Unearth Conduit 32481 Super Ice Corporation 90.39 Lab Supplies 32482 SKC-West,Inc 861.69 Safety Supplies 32483 Seven Trent Labs, Inc. 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 32484 Majory Thayer 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32485 The Orange County Register 3,133.00 Notices&Ads 32486 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,455.40 Mechanical Supplies 32487 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 32488 Daily Pilot 125.00 Notices&Ads 32489 Margaret Tompkins 97.56 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32490 Total Air Analysis,Inc. 625.00 Lab Testing Service 32491 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 10.175.02 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 32492 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 2,023.00 Lab Services 32493 Teksyslems 4,487.50 Temporary Employment Services 32494 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 32495 UHre Scientific 981.91 Lab Supplies 32496 Richard Underwood 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32497 Unisiml Los Angeles 1,469.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32498 United Parcel Service 927.44 Parcel Services 32499 UC Riverside 12.450.00 Professional Services-Study"Converting Wet Scrubbers to Biotrikling Filter' 326M Valley Cities Supply Company 1.090.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32501 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,620.W Temporary Employment Service 32502 Vapex,Inc. 6,436.68 Trunkline Equipment Malnt.&Technical Support 32503 Varian,Inc. 4,793.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 32504 Tony Vercillo 374.79 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid From 12116100 to 12f31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32505 Verne's Plumbing 907.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 32508 Village Nurseries 34.39 Landscaping Supplies 32507 Vision Service Plane(CA) 7,373.18 Vision Service Premium 32508 Vortex Industries, Inc. 898.00 Window Installation @ IT Trailers 32509 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 8,472.39 Lab Supplies 32510 Gwynne Watson 985.48 Recencilia5on User Fee Program 32511 Wells Supply Company 148.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32512 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 2,701.47 Safety Supplies 32513 Western States Chemical,Inc. 8,852.97 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 32514 Xerox Corporation 2,790.94 Copier Leases 32515 The Yakima Company 19,199.17 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-DD 32516 Local Agency Formation Commission 2,350.DD Annexation Fee 32517 Voided Check - - 32518 Union Bank of California 4,803.28 Construction P146.2, Retention 32510 William D.Cassidy 412.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 32520 Barbara A.Collins 129.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 32521 Mark A.Esquer 275.20 MeelinglTreining Expense Reimbursement 32522 Tom E.Gawomki 100.00 Meelirg/Training Expense Reimbursement 32523 James D. Niswonger 242.67 Construction J-33-1 32524 Robert H.Peters 1,349.30 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 32625 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 32526 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 32527 Marc A.Brown 1,098.07 Employee Computer Loan Program 32528 Martin Calls 1,773.00 Claim Settlement-Residential Sewage Backup 32529 Debbie Marchegiano and BEST BUY 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 32530 Voided Check - - 32531 Tenn L.Josway 347.88 Meetnng/Training Expense Reimbursement 32532 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 32533 Orange County Sanitation District 1,332.09 Petty Cash Reimb, 32534 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 32535 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 32636 Kimberly J.Bondman 1,648.57 Employee Computer Loan Program 32537 Jed L.Elliott 2,802.58 Employee Computer Loan Program 32538 State Board of Equalization 50D.00 Annexation Fee 32539 JLM Contracting 68,033.05 Construction Service-Pipe Repairs 32540 Orange County Sanitation District 433,770.32 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 32541 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 133.66 Legal Services-Torn vs. Kovacs 32542 Wynn Ellen Allard(Trost Fund) 1,083.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32543 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 984.45 Telephone Service 32544 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 68.33 Telephone Service 32545 Jesse Baker 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32546 Shabbir S.Basrai 262.35 MeetnngRmining Expense Reimbursement 32547 Joel Beckman 79.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32648 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 32549 Larry Bledsoe 204.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32550 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid From 12116/00 to 12131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32551 John J. Brown 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32552 B S Family Limited Partnership 409.96 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32553 J.C.Campbell, III 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32554 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 32555 Cotelllgent 175.00 Software Support 32556 J.L.Criner 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32557 Charles Cummings 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32558 CWEA Membership 180.00 Membership 32559 William Daniel 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32560 Lillian Decker 88.74 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32561 Chns Dialynas 672.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32562 David Dickinson 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32563 Todd Drevo 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32564 Randall Eldridge 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32565 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 32566 Fountain Valley Camera 14.60 Photo Supplies 32567 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 32M George E.Grismer(Trust Fund) 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32569 Harland Gillbank 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32570 Claire Glovak 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32571 James Green 104.60 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32572 Sally Grove-Lopez 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32573 Robert Hahn 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32574 Hone Depot 18.72 Small Hardware 32575 Ila Dee Shattuck(Trost Fund) 385.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32576 Industrial Metal Supply 112.72 Metal 32577 Information Corporation 3,600.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 32578 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Loral 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 32579 Santiago Jaimez 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32580 William Johns 635.16 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32581 Katherine Kinnear(Trust Fund) 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32552 Peter Kirk 531.50 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32583 Fred Koehnke 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32584 Robert Kolling 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32585 Lawrence Baker(Trust Fund) 385.69 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32586 John Lister 8 This Aley 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32587 Lucci's 87.30 Meeting Expense 32588 Robert Martinet 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32589 Gary Maxwell 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32590 Bailey McCune 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32591 Barbaro Ro-Jean Meadows 988.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32592 Mildred Bain(Trust Fund) 284A7 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32593 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 32594 Louis Neuschafer 82.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32595 City of Newport Beach 21.37 Construction 5-41-1 32596 Dal Van Nguyen 44.05 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid From 12116/00 to 12I31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32597 Tony Nguyen 234.63 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32598 Michael Nicholson 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32599 Virginia Nienburg 672.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32600 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 32601 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 32602 Thomas Fallen 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32H03 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 32604 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 32605 Patricia Emison Cox(Trust Fund) 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32606 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 32607 Gary Penny 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32608 John Perry 565.08 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32609 PCA Metal Finishing 262.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32610 Nancy Rikel 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32611 Robert C Lamb(Trust Fund) 69.86 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32612 Robert W Johnson(Trust Fund) 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32613 Rutan&Tucker L.LP. 5,882.85 Legal Services-Cr Wirithrop Development 32614 Joseph Savoy 369.71 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32615 City of Seal Beach 33.44 Water Use 32616 Donald Seaman 444.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32617 Simon,Larsen&Marsh 1.000.00 Professional Services-Chino Basin$1,000 Watennaster Transfer 32618 Robert Sifter 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32619 William P Sv4ft(Trust Fund) 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32620 Think Earth Environmental Education 7.000.00 Annual Contribution 32621 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1.933.71 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 32622 Tony Gudsch(Trust Fund) 385.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32623 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 32624 Utility Communicators International 350.00 Membership 32625 Richard Ventura 784A9 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32626 David Walser 389.16 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32627 James Webb 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32628 Henry Wades 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32629 Patrick Whelan 134.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32630 Judith Wilson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32631 Timothy Wren 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32632 WEF 102.00 Membership 32633 WEF Publications 1,820.00 Publication 32634 Zelda Roach(Trust Fund) 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32635 2001 I&HWCWEA,Inc. 780.00 Source Control Training Registration 32636 Dustin Barker&Guy Barker 95.99 Claim Settlement-Bicycle 32637 County of Orange 172.00 Exemption Fee Refunds Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,544,728. 33 Page got 10 Claims Paid From 12116100 to 12131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 21775-21887 Employee Paychecks $ 173.545.12 Blweekly Payroll 1=7100 21888.21892 Interim Paychecks 5,874.95 Adjustments 20230-20230 Interim Paychecks 139.65 Adjustments 56394-56842 Direct Deposit Statements 741,768.17 Biweekly Payroll 12/27/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 921,617.89 LWhe Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA $ 711,733.71 December Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Total Whe Transfer Payments It 711.733.71 Total Claims Paid 12/16100.12131100 $ 6,178,080.13 Page 10 of 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA REPORT e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 01/01/01 - 01/15/01 and 01/16/01 - 0128/01 a w.yen.o.neomw p.m.a.pwnnwoi ambnw•e.e.rennvmiw, eae Rn ersave Page 1 Claims Paid From 01101101 to 01/16/01 , ( Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 32638 Blue Crass of California $ 183.681.39 Medical Insurance Premium 32639 Brown&Caldwell 341.038.17 Engineering Services-2-41 32640 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 165.112.94 Natural Gas-Spec. No.99DD-28 32641 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 64,897.62 Computers-(1)2400 Class-Service,(1)645D-Class Server&(2)Chassis 32642 Kemiron Pacific, Inc 96,053.48 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 32643 Orange County Water District 44,556.80 GAP Water Use NO 10-23-96 32644 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 77.364.74 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 32645 Southern California Edison 50,731.31 Power 32646 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 122,356.22 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 32647 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 1110.214.55 Construction 3-38-1 32648 Accurate Measurement Systems 1,037.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32649 Accutite Fasteners,Inc. 34.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32650 Air Products&Chemicals 6.00 Lab Supplies 32651 Airborne Express 32.50 Air Freight 32652 Airgas Safety 1.262.18 Safety Supplies 32653 Stephen Ambuel 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32654 American Airlines 2.400.50 Travel Services 32655 Arcus Data Security 204.00 OBshe Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 32656 Artistic Blinds 75.00 Mini Blinds&Installation 32657 Asbury Environmental Services 160.OD Wavle Oil Removal 32658 Azur Environmental 855.35 Lab Supplies 32659 ARK Technologies 5,780.00 County System Programming 32660 ASR Analysis 360.00 Vibration Analysis C Bitter Point Pump Station 32661 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 32.11 Telephone Service 32662 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,040.43 Long Distance Telephone Service 32663 Jesse Baker 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32664 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 517.83 Lab Supplies 32665 Bolas Radiator Service 72.19 Auto Parts&Supplies 32666 Donald Brown 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32667 Joseph Burke(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32668 Calif Centrifugal Pump 110.00 Pump Maintenance&Repairs 32669 Cameron Welding Supply 73.39 Welding Equipment&Supplies 32670 J.C.Campbell, III 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32671 Carl R. Nelson,P.E. 2.050.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 32672 Carollo Engineers 7,678.50 Professional Services-J-66, (MANS Process Testing 32673 Freddie Carpenter 545.98 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32674 Rita Charlesworth 382.41 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32675 Compressor Components of California 780.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32676 Voided Check - - 32677 Cooper Energy Services 350.84 Engine Supplies 32678 Robed Cooper 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32679 Boyd Copenhaver 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32680 Corporate Express Imaging 177.79 Computer Supplies 32681 Corporate Express 512.59 Office Supplies 32582 Donald Corrigan 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01101 to 01M6/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32683 County Wholesale Electric Co. 232.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32684 Crane America Services,Inc. 660.00 Crane Services 32685 J.L.Criner 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32686 Charles Cummings 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32687 CASA 275.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 32688 OR&R.Inc. 1,575.00 Container Rentals 32689 CWEA-TCP 50.00 Membership 32690 William Daniel 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32691 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosollds Analysis 32692 The Dickson Company 374.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 32693 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 136.94 Paint Supplies 32694 E.Sam Jones Distributors,'linc. 394.23 Electrical Supplies 32695 Richard Elliott 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32696 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 32697 ENS Resources,Inc. 8,108.47 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 32698 FedEx Corporation 26.14 Air Freight 32899 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 118.05 Lab Supplies 32700 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 246.00 Concrete Culling 32701 Fleet Pride 5,555.83 Smoke Opacity Meter&Supplies-Auto Shop 32702 Forkert Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 2,316.00 Engineering Services P-183 32703 Fountain Valley Camara 35.86 Photo Supplies 32704 Franklin Covey 260.35 Office Supplies 32705 Fry's Electronics 54.89 Computer Supplies 32706 Ganahl Lumber Company 359.86 Lumber/Hardware 32707 Garraa-Callahan Company 1,440.08 Chemicals 32708 Michael Foulds 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32709 Getinge Castle 220.20 Lab Supplies 32710 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 16.969.58 Belt Filler Press Supplies 32711 Harland Gillbank 45.89 Rewnciliation User Fee Program 32712 Claire Glovak 45.89 Rewnciliation User Fee Progmm 32713 Golden Bell Products 7,194.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 32714 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,880.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32715 Sally Grove-Lopez 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32716 Verizon California 836.01 Telephone Services 32717 H.R.Macklin&Sons, Inc. 725.00 Professional Service-Land Appraisal 32718 Haaker Equipment Company 182.16 Truck Supplies 32719 Hach Company 891.83 Lab Supplies 32720 Robert Hahn 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32721 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 32722 Ernest Harvey 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32723 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 3,667.07 Engine Generator Control Supplies 32724 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 205.60 Meeting Expenses 32725 Hoerbiger Service, Inc 50.21 Compressor Parts 32726 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium 32727 Hub Auto Supply 61.59 Truck Pans 32728 City of Huntington Beach 13.330.97 Water Use Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32729 Huntington Park Rubber Stamp Co. 149.56 Stationery&Office Supplies 32730 HR Solutions, Inc. 141.69 Human Resources Participation Survey 32731 Industrial Distribution Group 212.05 Janitorial Supplies 32732 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 268.43 Lab Supplies 32733 Jay's Catering 1,158.76 Meeting Expenses 32734 Johnstone Supply 257.46 Electrical Supplies 32735 Joseph Jordan 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32736 Karen Monaco&Associates 5,250.00 FIS Support Services 32737 Claude Kastenholz 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32738 Katherine Kuester(Trust Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32739 Richard Kaye 433.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32740 Jack Kent 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32741 Kings Fertilizer Corporation 16,567.20 Sulfuric Acid 32742 Herbert Krause 6.828.02 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32743 La Mo0e Chemical Products 105.72 Chemicals 32744 Lexis-Nexis 68.62 Books&Publications 32745 John Lister&Tiea Aley 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32746 John Marks 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32747 Marjory Marks 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32748 Robert Martinet 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32749 MCNac Electronics 19.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32750 Gary Maxwell 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32751 Timothy Mayeda 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32752 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 487.27 Plumbing Supplies&Tools 32753 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 3,150.33 Celibrale/Repalr(5)Meters 32754 Thomas Metz 287.73 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32755 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,971.87 Elbow Pump Assembly 32756 Mission Uniform Service 3,478.07 Uniform Rentals 32767 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 32758 Vincent Moreno 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32759 Mine Safety Appliance Co. 552.14 Instrument Maim.Services 32760 Marcus Nay 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32761 John Newham 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32782 City of Newport Beach 67.67 Water Use 32763 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 733.07 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 32764 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 304.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 32765 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.184.09 O81oe Supplies 32786 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 22,538.29 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 32767 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 139.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies 32768 Orange County Business Council 70.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 32769 Orange County Hose Company 166.21 Hydraulic Hoge,Supplies&Repairs 32770 Orange County Treasumea Conference 119.00 Finance Meeting Registration 32771 Thomas Otis 988.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32772 Oxygen Service Company 45.08 Specialty Gases 32773 OCB Reprographics 6.588.79 Printing Service-MO 126/00 32774 Pacific Bell 16.08 Telephone Services Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From O1101101 to 01/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32775 Pacific Mechanical Supply 176.63 Plumbing Supplies 32776 Thomas Pollen 46.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32777 Parker Supply Company 3,187.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32778 Parkhouse Tire Co. 869.91 Tires 32779 Pans Unlimited 253.62 Truck Supplies 32780 Ramon Peterson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32781 Ponton Industries 2,596.18 Lab Supplies 32782 Primavera Systems,Inc. 961.00 Publications 32783 Pmpipe 600.00 CCTV Sewedine Inspection 32784 Dennis Proud 830.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32785 PCS Express 70.20 Courier Service 32786 DOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 32787 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 171.03 Instrument Repairs 32788 R. L Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 32769 Restek Corp 312.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 32790 Nancy Rikel 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32791 Robert W Johnson(Tmsl Fund) 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32792 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 6.990.00 Engineering Services-Additions to Fleet Services&Rebuild Shop 32793 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc 1,714.87 Specialty Gases 32794 Steven Severance 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32795 Richard Shinto 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32796 Shortridge Instruments, Inc. 3.242.94 Instrument Supplies 32797 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 373.78 Tools/Hardware 32798 Aldrich Chemical Co. 1,223.75 Lab Supplies 32799 Skater,Inc. 220.75 Lab Supplies 32800 SokChoice 27.87 Software 32801 Sperling Instruments, Inc. 260.00 Professional Services-Calibration of Ocean Outlall Meter 32802 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 381.85 Janitorial Supplies 32803 SludioVisia 450.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Malnt. 32804 Summit Steel 549.55 Steel 32805 Sunset Ford 91.98 Vehicle Supplies 32806 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,299.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 32807 Super Power Products 775.80 Janitorial Supplies 32808 William P. SwiB(Twat Fund) 46.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32809 SPEC Services,Inc. 4.008.91 Engineering Services J-33-1 32810 Ma)ory Thayer 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32811 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 379.75 Mechanical Supplies 32812 Tony s Lock&Sale Service&Sales 300.96 Locks&Keys 32813 Top Hat Productions 398.41 Catering Services 32814 The Unisource Corporation 7,449.03 Paper&O81ce Supplies 32315 United Parcel Service 20.50 Parcel Services 32816 United States Postal Service 97.00 P.O. Box Fee 32817 Valley Cities Supply Company 170.67 Plumbing Supplies 32818 Richard Ventura 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32819 VAR Scientific Products Corporation 537.55 Lab Supplies 32620 The Wackenhut Corporation 864.00 Security Guards Page 4 of 9 R Claims Paid From 01/01101 to 01/15101 ^ Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32821 Steven Welters 575.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32822 Timothy Wren 45.89 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32823 Xerox Corporation 10.030.85 Copier Leases 32824 The Yakima Company 19.797.38 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 32825 Yardley Instruments 3.410.35 Electrical Parts B Supplies 32826 Union Bank of California 5,274.45 Construction 338A, Retention 32827 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 1.100.89 Meeting framing Expense Reimbursement 32828 Ken A.Sakemoto 823.37 MeelirgRraining Expense Reimbursement 32629 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,905.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 32830 Orange County Sanitation District 1,229.35 Petty Cash Reimb. 32031 Barclays Bank PLC 84,008.19 COP Letter of Credit Quarterly Fee 32832 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28,397.85 Medical Insurance Premium 32833 Network Catalyst,Inc. 66,548.16 Computer Maintenance 32834 Orange County Sanitation District 435,285.76 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 32835 So.Cal,Gas Company 31.203.56 Natural Gas 32836 Christopher Muff 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32837 A-Plus Systems 4,365.00 Notices 8 Ads 32838 Airgas Safely 270.53 Safely Supplies 32839 Allen Alevy 745.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32840 Valentin Alvarado 155.28 Reconcillalion User Fee Program 32841 Aquenl,INC. 3,850.00 Temporary Employment Services 32842 Association of Cellf.Water Agencies 90.00 Publication 32843 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 14.78 Telephone Service 32844 AT 6 T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,918.61 Cellular Telephone Service 32845 Jesse Baker 155.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32846 Lawrence Baker 143.71 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32847 Joseph Ballard 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32848 Bank of America(Trust Fund) 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32849 Kenneth Barton 453.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32850 Lowell Beezley 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32851 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 249.48 Piping Supplies 32852 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 32853 Robert Bosley 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32854 Court Order 20D.00 Wage Garnishment 32855 David Buck 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32856 Mark Bustamante 575.66 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32857 Laurance Buller 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32858 J.A. BUOacavoli 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32859 Carl Warren 8 Co. 299.79 Insurance Claims Administrator 32860 Michael Caseley 830.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32861 Kenny Chang 8 JoAnne Nichols 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32852 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 32863 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4,763.95 Electrical Supplies 32864 Sandra Cook 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32865 William Craig 483.46 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32866 James Craig 303.59 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32867 Robert Cummings 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32865 CASA 18,150.00 Membership Dues 32869 CASA 1,425.D0 Admin. 8 Board Meeting Registration 32870 Joyce Dale 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32871 Steven Davey 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32872 Philip De Me= 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32873 Victor De Will 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32874 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 7,010.22 Computers(1) 32875 John Doyle 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32876 Richard Dreude 45.67 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32877 Kurt Dulka 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32878 Ecco Equipment Corporation 3,448.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32879 Environmental Engineering B Contracting 1,080.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Training-Speaker Fees 32880 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 32881 Sandra Flood 630.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32882 Jon Forquar 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32883 David Foster 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32884 Franklin Mutual Ltd. Partnership 611.08 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32885 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 32886 Fry's Electronics 789.46 Computer Supplies 32887 Dan Gaddis 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32008 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 77.37 Freight Charges 32689 Scott Gimbel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32890 Emma Gonzalez 82.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32891 Jack Gonzalez 329.51 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32892 Greg Good 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32893 Raymond Grange 343.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32894 Richard Gremer 357.24 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32895 Timothy Grubb 8 Melinda Findley 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32896 Vedzon California 3,497.28 Telephone Services 32897 Robert Hardwick 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32898 John Haupt 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32899 Craig Hechanova 830,38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32900 Barbara Henry 533.10 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32901 Michael Hesse 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32902 Robert Hill 346.99 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32903 Dennis Hoff 86.90 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32904 Dennis How 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32905 Industrial Distribution Group 492.37 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 32906 Information Resources 125.00 Human Resources Service 32907 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 32908 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 32909 Ralph Irwin 481,15 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32910 Chages Jessen 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32911 Donald Johnson 463.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32912 Peter Karagines 2,449.40 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 6ofg Claims Paid From 01101/01 to 01115/01 ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32913 Faisal Khan 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32914 Debra Kollmen 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32915 Nancy Jane Kva= 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32916 Lee Larson 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32917 William Lawrence 830.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32918 Leadership Directories,Inc. 289.75 Subscription 32919 Clement Lieber 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32920 He-Shiang Lin 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32921 Los Angeles Times-Archives 135.00 Printing 32922 LoJack 64.56 LoJeck Remotes 32923 LIMS/Leaer 13g.00 Subscription 32924 LRP Publications 377.50 Subscription 32925 Gunther Maier 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32926 Quinolaff Manisa 349.16 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32927 Ante Marovic 530.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32928 Shawn Mc Guinness 261.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32929 Francis Gerald McKenna 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32930 Chris Magna 44.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32931 Kirk Miller 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32932 Nadine Morey 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32933 Russell Muller 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32934 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 500.00 O&M Training Registration 32935 Scoff Nelson 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32936 Gloria Newell 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32937 Thomas Nicholson 3,941.92 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32938 Elizabeth O'Grady 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32938 Curtis Olson 741.72 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32940 Orange County CoastKeeper 3,000.00 Membership 32941 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 32942 Orange Valve&Filling Company 2,530.77 Filings 32943 Orrick,Harrington&Sutcliffe 2.000.00 Professional Sewioe-Arbitrage Calculations 32944 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 32945 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 32946 Patrick Park $30.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32947 Narendrakumer Patel 141.03 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32948 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 32949 William Paveloff 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32950 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 32951 Pickens Fuel Corp. 3,497.72 Professional Service-CNG Program 32952 Adolph Ponas 696.15 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32953 Henry Frisco 104.60 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32954 Mabel Privateer 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32955 Prodala 199.00 Software Maint. 32956 Jane Provencher 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32957 James Rafferty 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32958 Marlene Read 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01/01 to 01/15/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 32959 Daniel Regimbel 748.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32960 Livingston Richards 1,206.80 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32961 Steve Rivkind 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32962 Sandra Roosen 830.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32963 Pamela Rosingana 273.37 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32984 Gilbert Roys 1,170.68 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32965 Robert Runyard 329.15 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32968 Hafez Sabbagh 277.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32987 Victor Salinas 242.41 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32968 Ramon Sanchez 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32969 Salvatore ScafBde 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32970 Don Schmid 1,054.43 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32971 Terry Schroeder 44.36 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32972 Self-insurance Plane 929,22 Slate Workers Compensation User Funding 8 Assessment 32973 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 117.11 Concrete 32974 Edna Shelton 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32975 Michael Sinclair 349.16 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32976 David Smeltzer 470.98 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32977 Southern California Edison 8,603.07 Polder 32978 Southern Califomla Water 74.39 Water Use 32979 Stuart Spencer 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32980 Tony Spriggs 830.30 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32g81 Allison Squires 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32962 Louis Sterling 741.65 Reconclllatlon User Fee Program 32983 Jorge Succar 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32964 John Sulley 346.99 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32985 SCESA 160.00 Membership,Southern California Emergency Services Association 32986 Johnny Tedford 483AS Reconciliation User Fee Program 32987 Textile Engineering Associates 12.555.04 Sell Press Supplies-Cylinders 32988 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,674.20 Mechanical Supplies 32989 Ronald Thompson 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32990 Vidsh Todd 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32991 Gary Touges 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32992 Trend Micro,Inc. 4,949.68 Software Meint. 32993 Ming Taeo 132.21 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32994 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 32995 US Filler Wentates Carbon 3,442.62 Instrument Supplies 32996 Lisa Van Glnkel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32997 William Vance 483.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32998 Hill Randy Jay Vander 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 32999 Gerald Verpooten 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33000 Mika Vlllafana 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33001 Maurine Vogel 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33002 Water Environment Federation 5,000.00 Membership-Sponsor 33003 Water Environment Federation 565.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 330D4 Steven Watson 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 01/01101 to 01/16/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33005 James Wilmolh 3,169.69 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33006 John Windle 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33007 WEF-Registration Dept. 450.00 ECM Meeting Registration 33008 Carl Zirschky 284.47 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33009 John Zitny 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33010 Steve Anderson 200.DD Meeting?reining Expense Reimbursement 33011 Norman Eckenrode 500.00 MeelingRreining Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,360,743.22 Payroll Dlsbunsements 21893-22021 Employee Paychecks $ 174,580.51 Biweekly Payroll 01/10/01 22022-22028 Interim Paychecks 5,702.62 EMT SOP Payment 20229-20229 Interim Paycheck' 189.51 Adjustment 20231 .20231 Interim Paycheck' 3,531.46 Termination 66843-57294 Direct Deposit Statements 712,830.78 Biweekly Payroll 01/10/01 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 896,834.78 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 97,663.18 December Interest Payment on Sodas 1993 Certificates of Partidpation Chase Bank of Texas 45,470.12 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 143,133.30 Total Claims Paid 01/01/01 -01/16/01 $ 3,400,711.30 'Note that check rumbas 20229 through 211231 are out or s omenCe:also check e20230 wee Issued in December,and Included on the previous Claims Paid Pepsi Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 01M6101 to 01131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlittion Accounts Payable-Warrants 33012 ASL Consulting Engineers 6 51,306.05 Professional Services-11-22 33013 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 84,711.73 Professional Services-J-71-3 33014 Boyle Engineedng Corporation 36,609.41 Professional Services-1-2.4,2.31 &2.50 33015 Amoce Energy Trading Corporation 121,380.94 Natural Gas-Spec. No.MM-28 33016 Carollo Engineers 65,235.63 Professional Services-J-25-4&P2-66 33017 Computational Systems,Inc. 47,061.46 Instruments,Licenses&Certificates 33018 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 25,872.33 Computer Software/Hardware&Support 33019 JLM Contracting 88,033.05 Construction Service-Pipe Repair 33020 Kemlmn Pacl0c,Inc. 102,805.04 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 33021 Kronos,Inc. 35,057.91 Timekeeping Software,Training and Maintenance 33022 Mac Analytical System 25,000.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 33023 Montgomery Watson 44,637.98 Professional Services-2-21-1 33024 Network Catalyst,Inc. 66,548.18 Computer Software/Hardware 33025 Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. 45,000.00 Professional Services-Cleaning Digester at Pit.2 33026 Orange County Sanitation District 31.270.87 Workers Comp. Reimb. 34027 Painewebber Incorporated 41,211.48 COP Remarketing Agreement 33028 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 165,463.03 Engineering Services JA2 33029 Petroleum Traders Corporation 26,733.66 Gasoline 33030 Pima Oro Systems, Inc. 269,962.16 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33031 Projects Partners 59.469.17 Temporary Employment Services 33032 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 31,436.33 Pump Supplies 33033 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 173,076.20 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 33034 Southern Contracting Company 102,317.38 Construction J-33-1 33035 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 79,431.08 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33036 Vulcan 62,191.42 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 33037 Water Environment Research Foundation 71.760.00 Subscription - 33038 Western States Chemical, Inc. 39.688.12 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95 33039 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 46,782.54 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 33040 J W Contracting Corporation 105.120.00 Constructlon P2-60 33041 Ken Thompson,Inc. 476,451.48 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 33042 Margate Construction,Ina 454,583.00 Construction P2.39 33043 Clasen Construction,Inc. 51,468.00 Construction J-52 33044 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 59,010.97 Construction P1-46.2 33046 Southern Contracting Company 30,229.00 Construction J-33-1 33040 Union Bank of California 52,939.06 ConsWclion 11-17.3, Retention 33047 A-Plus Systems 1,823.28 Notices&Ads 33048 Great American Printing Co. 2,940.91 Paper 33049 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,692.50 Professional Services-Central Gen. Engine#2 33050 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Ina 4.637.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33051 Aearo Company 1,288.00 Safety Supplies 33052 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 314.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 33053 Alrgas Safety 664.22 Safety Supplies 33054 AIIMed,Inc 201.75 Computer Supplies 33055 American Express 21,427.25 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services 33056 American Management Association 1,525.00 Planning/Deeign/Engineering Training Registration Page 1 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116/01 to 01131101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33057 Anthony Past Control,Inc. 380.00 Service Agreement-Peat Control 33058 Appleone Employment Service 4,122.75 Temporary Employment Services 33059 Applied Industrial Technology 46.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33060 Aquent,Inc. 6.575.00 Temporary Employment Services 33081 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 33062 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 539.00 Vacuum Truck Services 33063 Ares Disposal Service,Inc. 724.10 Waste Removal 33084 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal 33065 Associated Vacuum Tech.,Inc. 145.38 Filter 33066 ASS Instrumentation 1,500.00 Flow Meter Repair 33087 AKM Consulting Engineers 2,081.96 Professional Services 11-20 33068 American Air Filter International i 616.58 Filter 33069 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 137.77 Telephone Service 33070 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 178.00 Cellular Telephone Service 33071 Samstead Thermolyne 1,309.44 Lob Parts&Supplies 33072 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 3,629.23 Voltage Regulator&Electrical Supplies 33073 Battery Specialties 2,210.66 Batteries&Misc.Supplies 33074 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 402.30 Lob Parts&Supplies 33075 BloMerieux Walk,Inc. 516.38 Lob Supplies 33078 Bloomberg L.P. 5,301.30 Financial Monitoring MO4-14.93 33077 Bureau of Reclamation 10.455.00 Southern California Recycling Coat-Sharing Project-J-36 33078 Burke Engineering Co. 127.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33079 Burrows Ind./Minuteman 277.88 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33080 Bush&Associates,Inc. 385.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 33081 Laurance Butler 34.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33082 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,340.00 Pump Supplies 33083 California Automatic Gale 1,001.26 Service Agreement 330B4 Cad R. Nelson, P.E. 3,140.00 Engineering Consultant 2.41 33085 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 17,771.15 Engineering Services P2.82&Dairy Washwater Pilot Project 330Be Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1,282.20 Leese Agreement-Color Printer/Copier System in Communications Div. 33087 City of Santa Ana 24,754.4E Cooperative Projects Program-J-73 33088 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 520.00 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 33089 Cole Scientific 682.30 Lab Services 33090 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 22,247.10 Professional Services-Communication,Safety&Emerg. Response Procedures 33091 Compressor Components Of California 1,360.50 Mechanical Repairs 33092 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9,862.60 Computer Maim.Agreement 33093 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 724.46 Electrical Supplies 33094 Converse Consultants 8.889.75 Consulting Services 11-20&P2-60 33D95 Cooper Energy Services 5.68 Engine Supplies 33096 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 33097 Corporate Express 538.42 Office Supplies 33098 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,323.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 33099 Cost Containment Solutions 3,419.26 Workees Camp.Services 33100 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 445.48 Communication Equipment Service 33101 County Wholesale Electric Co. 150.57 Electrical Supplies 33102 Crene America Services,Inc. 1,117.60 Crane Services Page 2 of 14 u ,. Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131101 Warned No. Vendor Amount Description 33103 Cylac Industries 13,925.25 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 33104 Voided Check - - 33105 Voided Check - - 33106 CEM Corporation 2,891.45 Lob Supplies 33107 CEPA Company 1,325.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 33108 CHMIA 50.00 Membership-Calif. Hazardous Materiels Investigators Assoc. 33109 CH2MHill 15,311.55 Engineering Service J-71-4 33110 CPI- California Pipeline Inspection 11,623.50 CCTV Sewer Inspection-3-38-1 33111 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 776.01 Lab Supplies 33112 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. 6,840.00 Lab Analysis 33113 CSMFO-Calif.Society of Mun.Fin.Officers 10D.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 33114 CWEA Membership 377.62 Membership -Calif.Water Environment Association 33115 David Jenkins 8 Assoc, Inc. 450.00 Lob Analysis Service 33116 Del Mar Analytical 1,071.00 Blosolids Analysis 33117 DeZudk C/O Misco/SouthWest 5,016.00 Valves 33118 DaZudk C/O Misrw/SoulhWesl 9,851.44 Valves 8 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 33119 Diamond H Recognition 797.49 Employee Service Awards 33120 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 834.66 Paint Supplies 33121 DDB Engineering,Inc. 12,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 33122 DGA Consultants, Inc. 10,008.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 33123 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 5,326.86 Electrical Supplies 33124 Eagle Picher Industries,L.L.C. 885.68 Lab Supplies 33125 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 740.00 Medical Screening 33126 Electra-Bond 996.69 Materials,Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 33127 Enchanter,Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 33128 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 180.00 Lob Supplies 33129 FedEx Corporation 223.34 Air Freight 33130 Filter Supply Company 131.45 Filters 33131 First Amerimn Real Estate Solutions 450.82 Orange County Property Information 33132 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 3,286.45 Lab Supplies 33133 Flo-Systems, Inc. 37.46 Pump Supplies 33134 Michael Foukls 784.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33135 Fountain Valley Camera 14.66 Photo Supplies 33135 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 77.47 Paint Supplies 33137 Fountain Valley Regional Hospital 273.00 Emergency Room Services 33138 Franklin Covey 119.01 Office Supplies 33139 FST Send and Gravel, Inc. 427.42 Road Base Materials 33140 General Electric Supply Company 6,017.04 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 33141 G9nahl Lumber Company 185.81 Lumber/Hardware 33142 Garah-Callahan Company 4,000.22 Chemicals 33143 George Yardley Co. 239.97 Lab Supplies 33144 Gelinge Castle 3,444.00 Lab Maintenance 8 Supplies 33145 Glerllch-Mitchell, Inc 16,212.40 Bell Filler Press Supplies 33M Gold Systems,Inc. 6,891.75 Professional Services-Ocean Data Collection,Storage 8 Interface 33147 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 33148 WW Grainger, Inc. 40.38 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies Page 3 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16101 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33149 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 3.412.95 Aerial Lift Repair 33150 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 108.42 Janitorial Supplies 33151 Vedwn California 3,435.61 Telephone Services 33152 Hach Company 208.87 Lab Supplies 33153 Harbour Engineering Group 3,926.55 Pump Supplies 33164 Harold Primrose Ice 64.00 Ice For Samples 33155 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,502.49 Plumbing Supplies 33166 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 70.61 Engine Generator Control Supplies 33157 Hawk Industrial Uniform 4,020.58 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33158 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Dail 49.00 Meeting Expenses 33159 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 12.99 Compressor Parts 33160 Home Depot 322.53 Small Hardware 33161 Iclus Consulting,L.L.C. 3,855.00 Records Management Program 33162 Imaging Plus,Inc. 876.35 Printing Service 33183 In Place Machining 6.730.00 Professional Services-COBS Pump Seal Upgrade 33184 Industrial Distribution Group 10,940.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33165 Information Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service 33106 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 320.19 Lab Supplies 33167 IBM Corporation 6,084.45 IBM AS/400 Lease 33168 IBM Corporation 359.05 IBM AS1400 Upgrade 33169 IECOC 22.00 Communications Meeting Registration 33170 J&B Auto Parts 240.15 Auto Parts&Supplies 33171 J.D. Edwards 1,020,00 Accounting Training Registration 33172 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 605.60 Construction Study of Purchasing Building 33173 Johnstone Supply 162.81 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33174 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 3,750.00 Engineering Services 2-41 33175 Kaman Industrial Technologies 16.04 Instrument Pasts&Supplies 33176 Karen Monaco&Associates 4,937.50 FIS Support Services 33177 Kolar Controls Inc. 822.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33178 Knott's Barry Farm 536.50 Employee Deposit Transfer 33179 Lab Support 8,444.76 Temporary Employment Services 33180 Larry Gagnon 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33181 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodfger&Spriggs 3,584.36 Legal Services-Tram vs.Kovacs 33182 Lewis&Lewis Enterprises 92.85 Stationery&Office Supplies 33183 Usloort Cassidy 1,845.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 33184 Llebert Corporation 2,816.32 Electrical Supplies 33185 Gerald R.Jones 11,001.04 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 33185 LOJack 681.48 LOJack System&Installation 33187 Maintenance Technology Corp. 395.62 Mechanical Supplies 33188 Manley's Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 1,200.00 Bailer Repair 33189 MasTeo Network Servloes 402.90 Communication Equipment Upgrade 33190 Materiel Control,Inc. 1,830.90 Electrical Supplies 33191 McMaster-Car Supply Co. 666.48 Safety Locks 33192 Mechanical Seel Repair, Inc. 911.51 Mechanical Repairs 33193 Media Clips,Inc. 38.00 Notices 33194 Medlin Controls Co. 712.11 Instrument Supplies Page 4 of 14 a, Claims Paid From 01116/01 to 01/31101 Warrant No. Vendor Amount I Description 33195 Metal Supply,Inc. 2,080.74 Metal 33196 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tum Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 33197 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,150.49 Mechanical Repairs, Parts&Supplies 33198 Minank 600.50 Instrument Supplies 33199 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 155.60 Janitorial Supplies 33200 Mission Uniform Service 3,902.50 Uniform Rentals 33201 Mobile Mini,Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 33202 MGD Technologies,Inc. 2,477.50 Temporary Flow Monitoring 11-22 33203 Mine Safety Appliances Company 355.95 Safety Supplies 33204 MSA Instrument Division 1,207.02 Instrument Supplies 33205 National Mlcmcomp Services 1,268.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 33206 Neal Supply Co. 1,301.19 Plumbing Supplies 33207 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 3,000.00 Facilities Deposit-Leadership Training Program 33208 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 10,579.40 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 332D9 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 6,664.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 33210 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 33211 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 133.50 Steel Tags 33212 Office Depot Business Services Div. 642.38 Office Supplies 33213 Optic Software 9,627.84 Optlo Form Implementation 33214 Orange County Winwaler Works 64.91 Plumbing Supplies 33215 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 776.15 Fillings 33218 Oxygen Service Company 2,265.60 Specialty Gases 33217 OCB Reprographics 722.23 Printing Service-MO 1/26400 33218 Of Analytical 144.77 Lab Supplies 33219 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 247.74 Air Conditioner Supplies 33220 Pacific Bell 23.41 Telephone Services 33221 Pacific Bell Internal Services 324.00 Internet Service 33222 Pacific Health&Safety, Inc. 1,805.00 Professional Service-Industrial Hygiene 33223 Pacific Mechanical Supply 9.864.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33224 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 3.353.92 Electrical Supplies 33225 Parker Hannifin Corporation 477.32 Mechanical Supplies 33228 Parker Supply Company 846.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33227 Parkhouse Tire Co. 35.26 Auto Parts&Supplies 33228 Peedess Wiping Materials Co. 720.25 Janitorial Supplies 33229 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 876.70 Lab Supplies 33230 Polydyne,Inc. 17,003.88 Cationic Polymer NO 3.11-92 33231 Precise Sensor,Inc. 1.078.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33232 Primary Source 11,480.28 Office Furniture 33233 Primedia Information,Inc. 78.48 Publication 33234 Process Equipment Company 846.46 Pump Supplies 33235 Propipe 1,434.51 CCTV Sewerline Inspection-2-41 33236 Quest,J.D. Edwards Users Group 1,050.OD IT Training Registration 33237 COS, L.L.D. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 33238 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.OD Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 33239 Rain for Rent 2,735.77 Pumping Services-5.51 33240 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,058.96 Trash Removal Page 5 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16101 to 01131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33241 Relnin Instrument Co.,Inc. 337.29 Lob Services 33242 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,988.78 Life Insurance Premium 33243 Restek Corp 674.65 Lab Parts&Supplies 33244 Royal Wholesale Electric 288.42 Junction Box Cover 33245 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 329.89 Paint Supplies 33246 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 22,725.00 Construction -Manhole Repair 33247 Schwing America, Inc. 1.074.86 Pump Supplies 33248 Sensotec,Inc. 2%35 Electrical Supplies 33249 Shuraluck Seim&Engineering 376.64 Mechanical Pena&Supplies 33250 Stemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,500.D0 Prof.Services-Chino Basin$500 Watermester Transfer,&Santa Ana Watershed Group$3.000 33251 Sievers Instruments 557.16 Lab Supplies 33252 Supeico,Inc. 72.65 Lab Supplies 33253 Skater,Inc. 2,766.69 Lab Supplies 33254 So.Cal.Gas Company 5,847.32 Natural Gas 33255 South Coast Environmental Co. 3,830.23 Con Gen Emissions Testing Service 33256 South Coast Water 144.65 Water System Supplies 33257 Sparkletls 2,049.61 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 33258 Spex Ceriprap,Inc. 502.41 Lab Supplies 33259 Spherion Corporation 10,000.00 Senior Executive Coaching Program 33260 Stainless Micso-Polish 541.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33261 State Board of Equalization 404.86 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 33262 Stale Water Resources Control Board 855.00 Publications-Administrative Records of(2)Law Cases 33263 Strata International, Inc. 605.46 Chemicals 33264 SludioVisia 250.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maim. 33265 Summit Steel 33.86 Metal 33268 Sunset Industrial Pans 61.94 Mechanical Supplies 33267 Soft America 699.79 Freight Charges 33268 SARBS-CWEA 10.00 Membership 33269 SKC-West,Inc. 1,715.20 Safety Supplies 33270 STL Sacramento 10.387.50 Lab Analytical Service 33271 Tosew,Inc. 7,005.91 Valves&Mechanical Supplies 33272 Tennant Company 20,221.97 (1)Tennant Shop Sweeper 33273 Tetra Tech,him 7,424.11 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 33274 The Pittsburgh Conference 180.00 Lob Training Registration 33275 The Orange County Register 1,608.75 Notices&Ads 33276 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 11,688.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33277 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 33278 Daily Pilot 118.75 Notices&Ads 33279 Todd's Enterprises 2,247.29 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33280 Tonys Lode&Safe Service&Sales 73.31 Lodes&Keys 33281 Tran Consulting Engineers 10,007.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects-Pl-65 33282 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,859.65 Conrad Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 33283 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 1,462.25 Truck Supplies 33284 TCH Associates,Inc. 995.65 Lab Supplies 33286 Teksystems 11,379.00 Temporary Employment Service 33286 U.S. Fitter Corporation 2,525.50 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System Page 6 of 14 a -. Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131101 1 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33287 Lisa Scientific 247.84 Lab Supplies 33288 United Parcel Service 17.45 Parcel Services 33289 Urocal 76 160.71 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 338-1 Inspection 33290 Valley Cities Supply Company 676.62 Plumbing Supplies 33291 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 16,862.00 Temporary Employment Service 33292 Varian,Inc 966.64 Lab Supplies 33293 Village Nurseries 30.09 Landscaping Supplies 33294 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10,201.64 Lab Supplies 33295 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,130.00 Sewrity,Guards 33296 The Wall Street Journal 188.56 Subscription 33297 Water Environment Federation 1,035.00 O&M 8 ECM Meeting 8 Training Registration 33298 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 19.422.99 Engineering Service J-67 33299 Wewanesa 303.58 Claim Settlement-Vehicle Damage 33300 Wade Sanitary Supply 514.31 Janitorial Supplies 33301 Weather Services International 3.459.00 Software Maint.-Weather for Windows 33302 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 28.50 Electrical Supplies 33303 Westmark Paint Co. 233.52 Painting Supplies 33304 William Bouseman 988.7E Reconciliation User Fee Program 33305 Willis Fogler 444.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33306 Xerox Corporation 6,058.38 Copier Leases 33307 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 12,400.00 Professional Services-FIS Upgrade 33306 Yardley Instruments 1.027.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33309 Union Bank of California 3,105.84 ConsWction PId6-2 8 J-53,Retention 33310 Union Bank of California 10,815.00 Construction P2-60 33311 John G.Gonzalez 60.00 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 33312 Wanda R.Hagerty 106.10 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 33313 Lisa M. Lawson 180.00 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement 33314 Orange County Sanitation District 768.25 Petty Cash Reimb. 33315 Edward M.Torres 332.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33316 Silvino C.Zuccollo 35.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33317 Orange County Sanitation District 487,948.95 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 33318 Southern California Edison 120,754.51 Power 33319 Acoustical Material Services 129.81 Ceiling Tile 33320 Airgas Safety 3,631.77 Safety Supplies 33321 American Chemical Society 250.00 Lab Training Registration 33322 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 91.84 Publication 33323 Atkinson-Baker,Inc. 319.57 Professional Services-Kovacs Claim 33324 AMSA 525.00 ECM Meeting Registration 33325 ASM 290.00 Lab Meeting Registration 33326 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 126.06 Telephone Service 33327 Barbara Taylor 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33328 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 33329 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 33330 Caffrans-Publication Unit 24.00 Publication 33331 City of Fountain Valley 12,889.44 Water Use 33332 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment Page 7 of 14 Claims Paid From 01116/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vender Amount Description 33333 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 2,147.16 Electrical Supplies&Maintenance 33334 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 270.18 Plumbing Supplies 33335 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 900.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 33336 CASA 50.00 ECM Meeting Registration 33337 CWEA Membership 195.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Association 33338 Daly Journal Corporation 226.28 Subscription 33339 DnecTV 670.00 Service Agreement-DirecTV @ Pit. 1 Control Center& Pit.2 Operations Center 33340 Employment Development Dept. 5,298.91 SUI Tax 33341 Environmental Law Institute 18.95 Publication 33342 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 33343 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Gamishment 33344 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership 33345 Graybar 1,576.85 Electrical Supplies 33346 Veri;on California 578.88 Telephone Services 33347 Harbour Engineering Group 17,100.80 Pump Supplies 33348 The Holman Group 708.58 Employee Assistance Program Premium 33349 City of Huntington Beach 13,304.09 Water Use 33350 Intl.Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 33351 Irvine Ranch Water District 51.94 Water Use 33352 Jeff Flynn&Associates 375.00 Professional Services-Security 33353 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1.722.67 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 33354 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.976.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33355 National Technical Information Service 1,863.50 Publications 33356 NASSCO 250.00 Membership 33357 Oracle University 1,400.00 IT Training Registration 33358 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 33359 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 33360 Pacific Bell 1,099.66 Telephone Services 33361 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 33362 Parker Hannifin Corporation 299.68 Mechanical Supplies 33363 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 33364 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 33365 PCA Metal Finishing 262.57 Reconciliation User Fee Program 33366 PCLA 215.00 Printing 33367 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,695.23 Tools/Hardware 33368 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 5W.00 Professional Services-Chino Basin Watennaster$500 Transfer 33369 Southern California Edison 23.99 Power 33370 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 6,293.76 COP Trustee Services 33371 United Way 310.00 Employee Contributions 33372 WEF-Registration Dept. 90,00 Source Control Meeting Registration 33373 WEF 202.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 33374 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 33375 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,160.00 Annexation Fees 33376 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fair 33377 U.S.Post Master 5,000.00 New Mail Meter 33378 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 30,977.82 Professional Services-J-73 Page 8 of 14 ,, Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33379 AKM Consulting Engineers 32,624.45 Professional Services 7-36,7-39,741 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 33380 Blue Cross of California 188,159.59 Medical Insurance Premium 33381 Brown&Caldwell 88,167.07 Engineering Services P7-37 33W2 Carollo Engineers 57,344.52 Professional Services-P1-60,J-39 33383 City of La Habra 240,548.65 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73 33384 Computerized Facility Intergration 112,303.60 Engineering Service J-25-1 33385 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 63.835.81 Computers-(3)Server Replacements 33386 Delta Dental 47,531.64 Dental Insurance Plan 33387 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 90,373.35 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 33388 Lee&Re, Inc. 55,420.40 Engineering Services 549,5.50,5.51.5-52&P2-39, P247-1,J-47 33389 Parsons Engineering Science. Inc. 230,306.07 Engineering Services J42 33390 Polydyne,Inc. 31.602.25 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 33391 Projects Partners 27,931.73 Temporary Employment Services 33392 City of Seal Beach 118.756.09 Water Use 33393 Southern California Edison 49,6%02 Power 33394 Southern Contracting Company 144.095.16 Construction J-33-1 33395 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 83,837.36 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 33396 Vulcan 37,987.73 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 33397 A Biederman, Inc. 1,235.23 Electrical Paris&Supplies 33398 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.35 Hardware 33399 Aceutite Fasteners,Inc. 906.72 Fasteners 33400 Great American Printing Co. 166.80 Printing 33401 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 6,954.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33402 Air Products&Chemicals 24.136.35 O&M Agreement Day Gen Sys MO 8.8-89 33403 Airgas Safety 115.93 Safety Supplies 33404 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 3.166.08 Manhole Frames&Covers 33405 Analysts,Inc. 2,032.46 Testing Kits 33406 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 415.00 Lab Supplies 33407 Appleone Employment Service 2.002.96 Temporary Employment Services 33408 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 3,100.00 Toxicity Testing 33409 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 370.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33410 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 32.24 Telephone Service 33411 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1.191.98 Long Distance Telephone Service 33412 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,060.70 Cellular Telephone Service 33413 Battery Specialties 905.16 Batteries 33414 Black&Veatch LL.P. 15,183.55 Engineering Services-J-71-3 33415 Boot Barn 96.87 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 33416 Breaker Supply Company 134.69 Electrical Paris&Supplies 33417 C.S.U.F.Foundation 9,550.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 33418 California Automatic Gate 115.00 Service Agreement-Automatic Gates&Barriers at Pit. 1 and Pit.2 33419 California Chamber of Commerce 45.30 Subscription 33420 Caltrol, Inc. 3,269.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33421 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 33422 Charles P.Crowley Co. 3,672.15 Instrument Parts 33423 Robert L.Chenowith 807.38 Employee Computer Loan Program 33424 Coast Transmission 1,631.81 Auto Repair Page 9 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to O1131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33425 Compressor Components Of California 750.00 Mechanical Parts&Testing 33426 Compusa,Inc. 216.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 33427 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 9,553.23 Electrical Supplies 33428 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 16.34 Plumbing Supplies 33429 Converse Consultants 7,056.00 Consulting Service 11-20 33430 Cooper Energy Services 9,296.33 Engine Supplies 33431 Corporate Express Imaging 482.05 Computer Supplies 33432 Corporate Express 462.30 Office Supplies 33433 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 12.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 9899-09 33434 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 130.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33435 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 80.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 33436 County Wholesale Electric Co. i 3,682.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33437 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 33438 CON Isotopes 310.00 Lab Supplies 33439 OR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 33440 CWEA Annual Conference 1,230.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 33441 Dart Controls,Inc. 1.527.38 Instrument Supplies 33442 David's Tree Service 360.00 Tres Mainl.Service 33443 Dal Mar Analytical 1,566.00 Siosolids Analysis 33444 DeZunk C/O Misco/SoulhWesl 310.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33445 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 274.66 Paint Supplies 33446 DDS Engineering, Inc. 2,820.00 Temporary Employment Services 33447 DGA Consultants,Inc. 12,132.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 33418 E.G.Brannon&Co. 95.00 Shredder Repairs 33449 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 1.169.49 Electrical Supplies 33450 E.G.Heller's Son,Inc. 58.12 Mechanical Supplies 33451 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 33452 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 33453 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1.328.37 Software 33454 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 33455 Fedl Corporation 205.35 Air Freight 33456 Filter Supply Company 880.36 Filters 33467 First American Real Estate Solutions 254.00 Orange County Property Information 33458 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 1,034.52 Lab Supplies 33459 Flo-Systems,Inc. 482.99 Pump Supplies 33460 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 1,022.00 Engineering Services P-183 33461 Thermo Forma 112.63 Lab Supplies 33462 Forts Benefits Insurance Company 19,527.05 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 33463 Fountain Valley Camera 13.71 Photo Supplies 33464 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 239.90 Truck Wash Tickets 33465 Foxboro Company 4,186.90 Instrument Supplies 33466 Franklin Covey 688.99 Office Supplies 33467 Fry's Electronics 2,149.26 Computer Supplies 33468 City of Fullerton 163.13 Water Use 33469 FM International,Inc 5,131.37 Professional Services J-25-1 33470 Genahl Lumber Company 1,620.97 Lumber/Hardware Page 10 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33471 GarraB-Callahan Company 1,400.64 Chemicals 33472 Gilmour Group 2.465.00 Hoses 33473 Gold Systems, Inc. 2,930.00 Professional Services-Ocean Date Collection,Storage&Interface 33474 Goldenwest Window Service 315.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.a990015 33475 WIN Grainger,Inc. 5,475.21 Electrical Pans&Supplies 33476 Grayber 55.84 Electrical Supplies 33477 Guardian Business Forms,Inc. 146.40 Printing 33478 GBC(General Binding Corp) 1,978.38 Stationery&Office Suplies 33479 Venzon California 837.50 Telephone Services 33480 Hach Company 1,624.75 Lab Supplies 33481 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 281.81 Plumbing Supplies 33482 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 106.15 Engine Generator Control Supplies 33483 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 29.00 Meeting Expenses 33484 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 267.57 Compressor Pans 33485 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 4,371.95 Engineering Services Pi-44.4 33486 Home Depot 640.10 Small Hardware 33487 Hopkins Technical Products 2,063.36 Pump Supplies 33488 Hub Auto Supply 129.78 Truck Pans 33489 City of Huntington Beach 25.29 Water Use 33490 Iclus Consulting,L.L.C. 8,317.50 Records Management Program 33491 Idexx 20.394.86 Lab Supplies 33492 Industrial Distribution Group 4,895.32 Mechanical Tools, Parts&Supplies 33493 Industrial Metal Supply 533.18 Metal 33494 Infinity Technology USA 3,827.16 Computer Supplies 33495 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 938.51 Lab Supplies 33496 J&L Industrial Supply 1,304.80 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33497 Jamison Engineering Conuactore,Inc. 2,185.99 Misc.Construction Services-Sinkhole Repair in Newport Beach 33498 Jay's Catering 365.91 Meeting Expenses 33499 Johnstone Supply 1,208.22 Electrical Supplies 33500 Karen Monaco&Associates 7,250.00 FIS Support Services 33501 Kelly Paper 78.43 Paper 33502 Kronos,Inc. 2,250.00 IT&Accounting FIS Upgrade Training for Timekeeping Program 33503 Lab Support 4,071.8E Temporary Employment Services 33UM Label Master 335.93 Safety Supplies 33505 LaMotte Company 75.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 33506 Lexis-Nexis 49&24 Books&Publications 33507 Gerald R.Jones 1,350.00 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 33508 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 1.963.50 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 33509 Maintenance Technology Corp. 190.92 Mechanical Supplies 33510 MerVac Electronics 98.31 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33511 MuTec Network Services 307.26 Communication Equipment Upgrade 33512 Matt Chlor,Inc. 2,044.92 Valves 33513 Mc Junkin Corp-Ontario Branch 78.42 Plumbing Supplies 33514 Medlin Controls Co. 130,30 Instrument Supplies 33515 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 8,827.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33516 Mission Uniform Service 3,006.09 Uniform Rentals Page 11 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/O1 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33517 MotoPhoto 107,83 Photographic Services 33518 Mulliforce Systems Corp. 4,395.00 Computer Equip.Services-Fuel Mgml. System 33519 MGD Technologies, Inc. 4.350.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 33520 MSI Metal Supply Inc 138.68 Metal 33521 National Microcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 33522 Neal Supply Co. 2,474.98 Plumbing Supplies 33523 NetVemant of Silicone Valley 7,251.93 Sewmy System Maintenance 33524 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 21.56 Steel Tags 33525 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,326.29 Office Supplies 33526 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 20.00 Freight Charges 33527 Optlo Software 2.421.39 Optio Form Implementation 33520 Orange County Business Council i 595.D0 IT Meeting Registration 33629 Orange County Health Care Agency 70.00 Underground Tank Storage Fee 33530 Orange County Hose Company 100.95 Fittings 33531 Orange County Winwater Works 242.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33632 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 107.45 Valves&Finings 33633 Oscar's Lock&Safe 34.93 Keys 33534 Oxygen Service Company 2,023.21 Specialty Gases 33535 GOB Reprographics 99.15 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 33536 OCV Valve 35.64 Plumbing Paris&Supplies 33537 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 376.13 Electrical Supplies 33538 Pacific Bell 16.26 Telephone Services 33539 Pacific Insulation Company 58.47 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 33540 Pacific Mechanical Supply 22,030.65 Pump, Plumbing Pans&Supplies 33541 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 175.81 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33542 Pegenet 2,531.83 Paging Services 33543 Parker Supply Company 2,109.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 33544 Parkhouse Tire Co. 928.83 Time 33545 Pens Unlimited 521.52 Truck Supplies 33546 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 675.00 Lab Equipment Repairs 33547 Pon Supply 128.98 Foul Weather Gear 33648 Power Electro Supply Co.,Inc. 170.26 Electrical Supplies 33549 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.60 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 335M Premier Fastener Company 880.33 Fasteners 33551 Primary Source 5,193.09 Office Furniture 33552 Project Management Institute 170.15 Publications 33553 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 3,273.38 Mechanical Supplies 33554 Putzmeister 22.65 Pump Supplies 33565 PCS Express 104.00 Couder Service 33658 PSI 90.00 Electrical Maintenance 33557 DOS, L.L.C. 256.62 Investment Management Program Service 33558 Rellastar 21,402.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 33559 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 7,946.78 Life Insurance Premium 33560 Rick Arbour&Associates 2,232.00 Consulting Service-O&M Worker Competency&Training Project 33561 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 1,277.58 Electrical Parts&Supplies 33562 RoaemounVUniloc 415.58 Instrument Supplies Page 12 of 14 4 Claims Paid From 01116101 to 01131/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33W RPM Electric Motors 2,088.13 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 33564 Schwing Americe, Inc. 20,497.75 Schwing Pump Parts 8 Repair 33565 Scott Specially Gases,Inc. 523.99 Specially Gases 33566 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 342.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 33567 Shepherd Machinery Co. 190.66 Truck Supplies 33568 Sigma Chemical Co. 979.48 Lab Supplies 33569 Skater,Inc. 41.73 Lab Supplies 33570 SoftView Computer Products 324.75 Stationery 8 Office Supplies 33571 SoftChoice 442.87 Software 33672 Stale Board of Equalization 294.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 33573 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 65.92 Office Supplies 33574 Sun International 157.12 Lab Supplies 33575 Sunset Ford 332.98 Vehicle Supplies 33576 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,192.59 Mechanical Supplies 33577 SPEC Services, Inc. 2,885.02 Engineering Services J-33-1 33578 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 33579 Telavers 8 Richardson 630.00 Consulting Services-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 33580 Taylor-Dunn 1.522.88 Electric Cart Parts 33581 Teledyne Analytical 164.27 Instrument Parts 33582 Textile Engineering Associates 4,021.58 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 33583 The Meniwood Corporation 4.574.00 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 33504 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,782.89 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 33585 Thyssen Dover Elevator 3,840.00 Elevator Maintenance 33586 Time Warner Communications 40A7 Cable Services 33587 Tony's Lode 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 7.28 Locks 8 Keys 33688 The Trade Company 3,1109.49 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 33589 Troy Systems,Inc. 063.12 Computer Supplies 33590 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 858.78 Truck Supplies 33591 Truesdall Laboratories, Inc. 180.00 Lab Services 33592 Teksyslems 5,859.00 Temporary Employment Services 33593 Union Bank of California 756.19 Banking Services 33594 United Parcel Service 1,012.46 Parcel Services 33595 US Filter Westates Carbon 3,359.33 Instrument Supplies 33596 Valley Cities Supply Company 1.608.29 Plumbing Supplies 33597 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,862.00 Temporary Employment Service 33598 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 11,769.72 Lab Supplies 33599 Wastewater Technology Tralnem 730.D0 OBM Training Registration 33600 Waxis Sanitary Supply 351.10 Janitorial Supplies 33601 Western States Chemical,Inc. 9,103.86 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 33602 Xerox Corporation 10,627.29 Copier Leases 33603 Xpedex Paper B Graphics 106.37 Office Supplies 33604 The Yakima Company 14.248.85 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 33605 Belachandra P. Rao 1,678.86 Lab Testing Service 336% Marcus D. Dubois 682.11 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 33607 Orange County Sanitation District 841.59 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,019,562.23 Page 13 of 14 Claims Paid From 01/16/01 to 01/31/01 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Pavroll Disbursements 22029-22094 Interim Paychecks It 70.053.07 Annual Payouts 01/17/01 22095-22095 Interim Paycheck 1,025.60 Flexible Spending Plan Reimbursement 01/17/01 22MS-22207 Employee Paychecks 164,547.29 Bhveekly Payroll 01/24101 22208.22211 Interim Paychecks 448.04 Directors'Paychecks 01/24/01 57295.57744 Direct Deposit Statements 729,707.92 Biweekly Payroll OW4101 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 965,781.92 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank 6 Trust Co.of CA $ 298,809.37 January Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation State Street Bank 2,425,073.80 January Interest Payment on Series 1990-92 Advance Refund Cerfificates of Participation State Street Bank 626,801.84 Overdraft Payment on Series 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 3,250,685.01 Total Claims Paid O1/16/01 -01131101 $11,236,329.16 Page 14 of 14 BOARD OF DIRECTORS M ng offia To ae.of Dir. �/�alor AGENDA REPORT Ikm Numbe )em 9(a)(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Mike White, Risk Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE MICHAEL REZVAN, MIKE ENTERPRISES, INC. V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, BARNARD CONSTRUCTION, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Negligence, Nuisance, and Waste, Michael Rezvan, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 NL10525, in connection with Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and refer to District's contractor, Barnard Construction Company, Inc., St. Paul Insurance Companies, and General Counsel, to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Service of summons and complaint by Michael Rezvan, Mike Enterprises, Inc., arising out of Contract No. 3-35R (REBID), Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel. GGS:MW:BG cw fte ome&l Mpantie ReWftu lea Agenda R$NftO lg eleldm R.,:ee. v Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF. SPRADLIN Br SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: February 6, 2001 RE: Rezvan v. Orange County Sanitation District Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 NL10525 On February 1, 2001, the District was served with a summons and complaint by Michael Rezvan, arising out of the Construction Agreement with Barnard Construction Company, Inc., Contract No. 3-35R. Mr. Rezvan, who owns and operates a Mobil gas station and mini-mart, as well as a car wash facility in Buena Park, both of which are in the direct location of the construction activities, alleges damages, as well as loss of profits. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement with Barnard Construction, the District is entitled to and will require Bernard Construction to secure counsel and represent the interests of the District. However, it is recommended that this matter be referred to the General Counsel to appear and defend, in the event Bernard Construction fails or refuses to do so. Gr�'✓1G.d � � . OMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. D.A. Ludwin Mr. G.G. Streed Mr. M. White BOARD OF DIRECTORS tneennq Date TO Rd.81 0 1 r. z1gerot AGENDA REPORT lmneumbr Itnn 9NumW ((b)b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowilh, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD -19 - HUGHES ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from Michael Hughes requesting annexation of 1.12 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District at the intersection of Amapola Avenue and Ranch Wood Trail in the City of Orange; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 01-05, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD -19 Hughes Annexation). SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) received a request from Michael Hughes to annex 1.12 acre, consisting of one lot, to the District. This lot is located at 20361 Amapola Avenue in the City of Orange. This lot will connect to an existing 8-inch sewer that belongs to the City of Orange. The property owner will build a single-family dwelling. This property to be annexed is located in Revenue Area No. 7. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.B tax exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of$9,083.00 includes the following: District Processing Fee $500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $300.00 Revenue Area Study Fee $100.00 Notice of Exemption Filing Fee $43.00 LAFCO Processing Recording Fee $1,150.00 Annexation Acreage Fee $4,460.00 Permit House Connection Fee (5 bedroom) at 25871 Amapola Avenue $2,530.00 TOTAL FEE TO ANNEX $9,083.00 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated after the Orange County Sanitation District (District) consolidation. District Annexation numbers now begin at OCSD — 1. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Exempt (Notice of Exemption was filed on 1/25101). ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map 3. Petition for Annexation RLC:jak 0Awp.dt,Wganda\Bwrd Agenda Reporb12001 Board Agenda RepwW0201 V1am 9(b).deo Page 2 alak: 5953 Modulo:86 1 EXHIBIT `A' 2 OCSD-19,HUGHES ANNEXATION NO.DA 01-01 3 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4 That portion of the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State of California, being 5 Parcel 3 of a Parcel Map recorded in Book 132, Page 8 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the 6 County Recorder of said Orange County,together with a portion of Amapola Avenue(60.00 feet 7 wide)more particularly described as follows: 8 BEGINNING at an angle point in the existing boundary of the Orange County Sanitation 9 District(OCSD)as established by"Annexation No. 75"to Orange County Sanitation District 10 No. 7 (to OCSD-7),said angle point being at the Northeasterly comer of said annexation, at the I I Northeasterly terminus of that certain course described as"North 63*5110"East, 151.58 feet" in 12 said annexation,said angle point also being at the centerline intersection of said Amapola 13 Avenue and Ranch Wood Trail(50.00 feet wide), said angle point also being Orange County 14 Surveyor's Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 3225,having a coordinate value (U.S. Survey 15 foot)of North 2239199.196 and East 6097872.591 based upon the California Coordinate Systerr 16 (CCS83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD(1991.35 epoch O.C.S. GPS Adjustment)as shown on Record of 17 Survey 92-1028,filed in Bookl49,Pages 10 through 20,inclusive,of Records of Survey,in the 1s Office of the County Recorder of said County; 19 THENCE,along said existing OCSD boundary per said Annexation and per"Annexation No. 20 126,Newell-Muth""Annexation No. 55,Ridgeline/Lazy B"and "Annexation No. 123", to said 21 OCSD, through their various courses in a general Southwesterly,Northerly,Easterly and 22 Southerly direction to the Southwesterly comer of said"Annexation No. 123", said comer also 23 being a point on the centerline of said Amapola Avenue, distant,along said centerline,North 24 63048'04" East,25.80 feet from the Point of Beginning of this description; 25 THENCE,South 63048'04" West, 25.80 feet,along said centerline, to the POINT OF Page I oft .1 EXHIBIT`A' 2 OCSD-19,HUGHES ANNEXATION NO.DA 01-01 3 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4 5 BEGINNING. 6 7 The above described parcel of land contains 1.121 acres,more or less. s 9 Attached and made a part of is a map, designated as"Exhibit"B". 10 Il 12 This proposal was prepared by me or under my direction. 13 14 oJ% /,k�� RobertJe ' eI:,L.S.6803 F�mo 15 My license expires 9/30/2004 i tto.eaaa s em.aao� a 16 # 17 oF cPJ 18 This proposal does meet the approve(of the Orange County Surveyors Office. 19 ryT} Dated this day of r--eS _z001. --- 20 ®rp zt J anas, n eyor L.5.4408 22 license expires 9130101 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2 ,V BLOCS, 5950 SHEET IfRI MODULE, e6 EXHIBIT °BR OCSD-19, HUGHES ANNEXATION NO. DAOI-01 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT •ANNEXATION NO.55-(RIOGELINE/LAZY B) TO THE OCSO. (OCSO-T) Scale 1'= 50' SO 0 50• 100, LEGEND \ ANNEXATION BOUNDARY PARCLi i.. YAP RNNEX4TIDN O.RI' l.fr:/L} I TO THE OCSD EXISTING ORANGE COUNTY (RAaCL.L g (OCSD-il SANITATION DISTRICT BOUNDARY 'ANNEXATION NO.126' ANNEXATION AREA (NEWELL-MUTH: I,RIACRES /- TO THE OCSO (OCSD-7) 6WU COA.'A MWEM.-0.123' wr. mv Rae.yti A ( G.P.S.022S 1 N}]39194N6 J,`n 'IY i E R " q;,.C91 vP' yy E6 RAW Tails-lm6 o ' 'ANNEXATION K.75• 8 TO THE OCSD (OCSO-TE lb TN/SJ v�aov6su s vev. Eo eY AW OR WOFR Ln MReGTnw \ ROBFRI C6R. L.S.6 0 YY LICEN6C EXIN[C 9A0/0. WJO i frP A'� • ! (� •�A16W0T+ TN6 PRWOfiAL ODES WET 1XE APPROVAL a 14 MAW " S vAOK OFN.E �y1 AN, RATED T , MCA NO. , AAW JON,CA .COUNTY SWW . ..HW YY LIC EXPIRES 9 ]0/0 i NP��LPM �L'awbW' nWmNnYlmlkm.2..ft W.21,MO 11.42.11 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION To: Board of Directors Date: Orange County Sanitation District Revenue Area No. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 1 (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex I acres(Gross-to nearest hundredth)of territory to the District located in the vicinity of, Q,v.,o Pac,- A-vEy Ito l2,sxew WbOD 7174, — oRA"at PA-Ale- As,ZAS_ (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of o R Aw44E J F-A4 more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: M0361 A-vAL The reason for the proposed annexation is Said property is—inhabited/ uninhabited. Number of registered voters, If any The assessed va a of the property is $ 37(>r Sc�7 OCR Also enclosed is the SHORT FORM & PROPERTY OWNER CONSENT FORM required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate),justification of proposal questionnaire shall be used when there are 12 or more owners. and a check in the amount of$500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications retalive to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: �'OR�54—k7[4ea��o� •��QS'6�-n,� Dw�+.e L se-97( dame MtSSio.t VeaSa, 244/ Phone:(249� Phone: T SIGNA.TU5g OF LANVOWNFR DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER X ( 115) (.U�s7�ue�.p Sr.✓C 6a4.1mAtZle bieovg, Qr 72KV3 Name (Typed or Printed) X M IC Name (Typed or Printed) HAn.ala\eng\DISTRICTSVonemfions-No yeaASECTION 114m BOARD OF DIRECTORS reeRg Dm To ad.ofDir. xlxa/or AGENDA REPORT 1°nnN n°' nNun°° 9rc1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-52 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve the purchase of real property located at 810 East Balboa Boulevard, Newport Beach, California at an amount not to exceed $540,000; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$600,000 for Rehabilitation of"A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total project budget of$2,848,000. SUMMARY In January 1999, MacDonald-Stephens Engineering (MSE), completed an assessment of 17 of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) outlying pump stations as part of Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37. The resulting report documented the mechanical, electrical, structural, seismic, safety, and hydraulic capacity deficiencies of each facility. The report also recommended improvements and additions to, or replacement of each facility to meet national and state codes, current District standards, and the District's 1999 Strategic Plan projected peak flows. Individual projects were then established on the basis of the MSE assessment report. In April 2000, a Professional Services Agreement(PSA)with Lee& Ro, Inc. was approved for the design of the rehabilitation/replacement of the "A" Street, le Street, Rocky Point, and Bitter Point pump stations. In addition to preparation of a Siting Report, Preliminary Design Report, Construction Documents, and Construction Support Services for each station, the PSA's Scope of Work induded review of the details of the assessment report and its recommendations as part of the District's Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program. The findings of the review were to be incorporated into the Siting Report for each station. The Siting Report for"A" Street Pump Station is now complete. The report recommends a new pump station, instead of rehabilitation. The recommendation is based on: (1) Lack of adequate reinforcement in the station's floor to prevent damage due to liquefaction of the adjacent soil during an earthquake; (2) Lack of OSHA code clearances in the station for personnel; (3) Minimization of disruption to the community during construction; and (4)Availability of property adjacent to the existing pump station. \W"EtlehlMytlbgpTM"`Hm,tl•p"rga Rpp,tlVGt16 cN•pMv Rpa,k'pA1U,em Bic)OJe RMW: erg Page 1 The available property, 810 East Balboa Blvd., is adjacent to the existing station. The new station will use approximately 1,700 square feet(sq. ft.) of the 3,415 sq. ft. site. Uses for the unused portion of the site have yet to be determined. A dosed restaurant, currently for sale by its owner, occupies the site. The Staff, with direction from the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee (PDC), entered negotiations with the owner. The Staff and owner have reached an agreed price for the site, subject to the Board of Directors' approval, of$540,000, plus miscellaneous title and escrow fees of approximately $5,000. The proposed site has been discussed with City staff. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Rehabilitation of the"A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, needs to be increased by$600,000, from $2,248,000 to an amount not to exceed $2,848,000. The cost of real property was not included in the original budget. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 2000-01 CIP Budget: Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, Section 8, Page 38. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The"A" Street Pump Station is located underneath Balboa Boulevard at"A" Street on the Balboa Peninsula. The station was built in 1948, for the City of Newport Beach, but currently owned and operated by the Orange County Sanitation District (District). The station is a 16-foot inside diameter reinforced concrete wet well/dry well facility. The District's last upgraded electrical equipment in 1992, the wet well lined in 1972. The rehabilitation of the station recommended by the 1999 Assessment Report consisted principally of the following: • Seismic(earthquake) supports within the station, • Replacement of the access to the station, c\vgtmWGedo`�N N=^Ea aewmVaat eaa,a ne^^e.PettaOAfvyn 9(cl aoc AMw Page 2 J • Installation of an underground electrical vault to house new electrical and control equipment(remove the existing electrical equipment from the existing facility), • Installation of an underground flow meter vault (no meter currently exists), • Installation of a side storage vault to receive and store influent flow during the time the station is down due to a power loss prior to the Staff arriving with a mobile diesel generator. (Side storage is opposed by the City of Newport Beach). The new station located on the adjacent property is to consist principally of the following: • Below grade wet well/dry well structure (housing the pumps), • Above grade electrical building (housing the control/electrical equipment and standby electric generator), • On site parking, • Approximate 1,700 square feet open space (use to be determined) The station is to meet all current national and state codes (including seismic requirements), and Orange County Sanitation District (District) standards. A new station is recommended for"A"Street on the basis of: (1) Lack of adequate reinforcement to prevent damage due to liquefaction of the adjacent soil during an earthquake; (2) Lack of adequate clearances in the station for personnel; (3) Minimization of disruption to the community during construction; and (4)Availability of property. ALTERNATIVES The upgrade of the "A" Street Pump Station could be limited to the rehabilitation of the existing facilities. Rehabilitation of the existing facilities would leave in place, beneath a major street, a 53-year-old structure subject to failure due to an earthquake or lost of power to the station. CEQA FINDINGS The rehabilitation of the outlying pump stations is addressed in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. Several, but not all of the pump stations were individually addressed. CEQA EIR requirements will be evaluated and addressed by the Districts consultant, K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. Lee & Ro, Inc. will provide support to K.P. Lindstrom under this Professional Services Agreement ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Figure 1, Location Map 3. Figure 2, Location Map WDC:jak:jo G:Wip.c tabgende\Board Agenda Report A2001 Board Agenda Reperts=01 Utem 9(o).dm G N.'VA•Wpbticl9m,C p^^4 aew•umr eo.,e�penEa ae{ahPl4lasn 9(ctOx aid: araaa Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-52 ' y oldty1ymw� ' CURRENT PROPO$EDI I PRORO$EDW FUND � - THIS PRO$ED E$TI"AAtE E )tR05BRY/TA$R.ri rAUlfH0f dib PROJECT BUDGE-I' r P REVI$Eb- - AUTHOR ED AUTHORZATION TAL E%PEN6.ITUR� �P r f,•1 OUbGET BUDOETr , INCREASE BUDGET• 70 bATE REgUE3T jAUTHH0;RlZATION TOb Y'E r 15 { { Project Development $ 21,000 $ 20,000 $ 19,000 $ 1000 $ 20,000 $ 19000 1,000 $ 1000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 15.000 $ 14.000 $ - $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ - $ 14,000 $ 14,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 270.000 $ 270000 $ 55000 $ 325,000 $ 237.790 $ - $ 237.790 $ 24000 10% Design Staff $ 23.000 $ 22,000 $ 19.000 $ 41,000 $ 22,000 $ 19,000 $ 41,000 $ 14,000 34% Purchase of Real Property $ - $ - $ 545.000 $ 545,000 $ - $ 545000 $ 545,000 $ 0% Construction Contract $ 1,238.000 $ 1.238,000 $ - $ 1,238,000 $ - $ $ - $ 0% Construction Administration $ 174,000 $ 173,000 $ - $ 173,000 $ 54,000 $ - $ 54,000 $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 131,000 $ 131.000 $ - $ 131,000 ' $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 376,000 $ 380,000 $ - $ 380,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 2,248,000 $ 2,248,000 $ 600,000 $ 2,848,000 $ 347,790 $ 545,000 $ 892,790 $ 53,000 1 6% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 2,248,000 1 $ 2,248,000 1 $ 600.000 1 $ 2.848.000 11 $ 347,790 1 $ 545.000 1 $ 892,790 $ 53,000 8% 5.52 Amended Budget Table(1) 8 REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-52 a�" roam PNk New aw SAorSf,_ ot �,` , , oaka 3W" BBdy Isle PROJEPROJECT LOCATION CT . .. . aal6oalslan4a FIGURE 1 O z 3an�►� � N , � 11 Itk \i O O O low t O` \ Cf N1O , EX - - � o _ W de . 1I 1 vevt 1 1\ t t It t n s'• , 11 It, , A, d is dW © Q �1®1 1, 11 \ - 1 nd � 11 1 1 R NOi y33als .oV R O 1gd3 OV8 o 4 ALCFY SAY ATmr v x p m � s�mm- 0000 � s i BAY AVilt" ! A O O V+ � - "x �� ` BAY FRONT Q SfCTKNJ ZS.g 'ON lov-diN00 dWnd 133a1s •.d" `NOildls 3141. .3O t4011tl111l9dN311 t BOARD OF DIRECTORS 10"UNcare T.arza/oea.a t or. AGENDA REPORT n.m Numr., Urn ONMW ld) Omnge County sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Andrei loan, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 241 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an easement appraisal procedure for the acquisition of private easements in connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241. SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) needs to acquire right of way easements across sixty-nine private properties in the City of Yorba Linda for the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) sewer line. Because the current schedule shows starting negotiations on February 22, 2001, there is not time to perform separate appraisals for each individual property. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Board approve an abbreviated easement appraisal procedure for this process in accordance with State law. When the property interest to be acquired is an easement for the construction of a sub-surface sewer, State law allows certain procedures regarding completion of appraisals and offers to purchase to be adopted, (Califomia Government Code Sec. §7267). California Government Code §7267 at. seq. applies to the acquisition of property by public agencies. It is the code section that requires real property be appraised prior to the initiation of negotiations. This law allows a public body to dispense with the appraisal requirement if they are seeking a non-possessory right of way for sewers, which is the situation for this project. Brown and Caldwell, the Consultant for this project, will therefore prepare a"right of way agent's opinion of value" for use in the negotiation process. This opinion will be comprised of a survey of land values in the area and an individual calculation of the discounted value of the right of way to be acquired. For each affected property, the Consultant will prepare an individual summary of the Calculations for use in the negotiation process. It is important to note that the Consultant's summary is not an appraisal; it is simply a summary used as a basis of good faith negotiations with each property owner. It is this process that the Board is being asked to adopt for the project, in order to meet the current project schedule. The schedule associated with the easement acquisition process is as follows: 2120/01 The Design Consultant will complete the"right of way agent's opinion of value" in lieu of separate appraisals for each property easement. 2/21/01 The District will sponsor a public meeting at the Yorba Linda City Council Chambers to discuss the project with the public. The easement property owners will be invited to meet separately with a representative of the District to discuss details of the easement acquisition. 2/26/01 District formally approves alternate easement appraisal process. 3/22/01 The District expects to conclude negotiations regarding acquisition of easements based on "right of way agent's opinion of value" 4125/01 The District expects to complete the full appraisal(s) on any potential property, where the District could not conclude negotiations with the property owners. The District expects to present to the Board, the status of negotiations (in closed session) and obtain Board authorization to make a "Final Offer"for the purchase of necessary easement property based on full appraisal value for any such easement that negotiations were not completed. 4/26101 The District will mail any"Final Offer," if needed. 5/04/01 After a Seven day waiting period, the District will provide written notice of hearing on a "resolution of public necessity" by first class mail to each private property owner with whom easement negotiations were not concluded. 5/23/01 The Board will conduct a hearing on "resolution of public necessity" for all "hold out" private property owners. 6/01/01 Legal Council will file and serve complaint and "lis perdens," commencing eminent domain proceedings, if necessary. 6/15/01 The District expects to receive the court's"Order of Immediate Possession" starting the 90-day waiting period prior to the District taking possession of the property. 9/14/01 The District expects to take possession of the property described regarding easement(s)for which eminent domain proceedings were conducted by the District. 10/24/01 The District plans to award the contract for Relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41. Most of the properties affected by the easement are single-family residential properties. Each easement will be located along the rear portion of the affected properties. The area necessary for construction is along the bicycle path behind the houses and is outside the fenced portion of the properties. No habitable structure will be affected and no one will be displaced or otherwise relocated either temporarily or permanently as a result of acquiring the easements and constructing the project. During the negotiation phase, the District negotiators will rely on a "right of way agent's opinion of value" to establish a fair and reasonable price. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item). This item is for approval of the process, not for establishing a purchase price and budget for the easements. Y ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES This abbreviated alternative easement appraisal procedure may be eliminated and the easement acquisition process extended, thereby delaying the construction start date. CEOA FINDINGS An Environmental Impact Report for this project was certified on July 19, 2000. A Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2000. ATTACHMENTS N/A HK:jak:jo GSwp.dla%agenda\Board Agenda Repeds'2001 Board Agenda Repoda10201V1em 9(d).dos ; DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, January 24, 2001 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, January 24, 2001 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Don Hughes Peter Green, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee STAFF PRESENT: Steve Anderson, Chairman, PDC Committee Blake Anderson, General Manager Shirley McCracken, Chairman, FAHR Committee Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Jim Silva, County Supervisor Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance None Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Sonja Wassgren, Public Information Coordinator Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the December 20, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode introduced Director Shirley McCracken as the newly-appointed FAHR Committee Chair. He also reported on the CASA meeting held last January 18-20, 2001 in Palm Springs. Directors Steve Anderson,Joy Neugebauer and Peer Swan also attended the i s Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 January 24, 2001 conference. A meeting is being scheduled between Jim Stahl, general manager of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Blake Anderson and Chair Eckenrode to discuss working together on San Gabriel River issues that impact Seal Beach. Chair Eckenrode announced that there will be a new Directors Workshop on February 10,2001, beginning at 8 a.m. New directors on the Orange County Water District Board will also be invited. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that BIII Mills, general manager of the Orange County Water District, has invited Sanitation District directors to attend their series of noon-time briefings. A. OMTS Committee Changes: The Staff Report was summarized by Bob Ghirelli, director of Technical Services. Three options were discussed and the Committee members moved, seconded and approved continuing the existing schedule for the time being (10 meetings per year with January and August dark). If staff believes that there are Insufficient items for the Committee to review, the meeting will be canceled after discussion with the Committee Chair and the general manager. The members indicated that this same guideline should apply to all committees. B. Update on Kem and Kings County Biosolids Activities: Mike Moore updated the members on recent activities in Kings County. It appears that the Board of Supervisors has changed directions and is now recommending changing the ordinance to ban the land application of Class B biosolids in 2003,allow Class A-Exceptional Quality material for three additional years and in 2006 all biosolids must be Class A-EQ compost. These changes are under review at this time and it appears that several lawsuits are being considered. Staff is discussing options with General Counsel. It appears that CEQA requirements were not followed. The District's property in Kings County is in production and Mr. Moore thinks that the property values have increased, in spite of the proposed changes to the ordinance. One-half of our biosolids are being trucked to Riverside County. The county's Environmental Health department has issued an opinion paper on the operation of the facility and the Impacts of continuing development in that area. There will be a 30-day review of the paper before the Supervisors act on it. Staff is talking with the City of Colton about a new proposed composting facility located within their city. The city's staff is very supportive of our agency taking part in this endeavor. All public outreach efforts have been done with the community and the Board of Supervisors has expressed support for the project, as has the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. This Issue will be discussed with the OMITS Committee In March. C. Power Update: Blake Anderson reported on how the District is managing Its power requirements during the energy crisis. A decision was made last week that we will pay the spot-market price for natural gas to supplement the digester gas used in the central power generation system during Stage 3 alerts. Conservation efforts have resulted in savings of about 2 megawatts of power(equivalent to 2000 homes). • Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 January 24, 2001 D. Update on the Five-year Staffing Plan: Greg Mathews provided a preview of the report that will be presented to the standing committees in February. He reviewed the changes in staffing over the next three years and the reasons for those changes. E. Outreach to Cities: Blake Anderson reported that staff has met with 16 of the cities in Orange County in an effort to provide information on common issues regarding sewer infrastructure. Eight additional meetings have been scheduled and four remain to be set. F. Freeze on Federal Rule Making: President Bush has placed on hold all proposed rules left over from the previous administration. This includes the regulations on CMOM and TMDLs, as well as other major pieces of regulatory reform. When there is movement, staff will notify the directors. G. State of the District Report: Blake Anderson will be presenting a 'State of the District' report at the Board meeting. He will be discussing in detail the Huntington Beach and energy issues,as well as listing some of the other major projects impacting the District. H. GW RS Financial Study: PRAG, the firm preparing the financial report on the project, still has not presented a final draft, but will by the end of the week. The Water District staff is still considering some of the findings. The final draft will be reviewed by the Joint Coordinating Committee at its next meeting. Director Steve Anderson questioned the practice of receiving IRW D flows during its voluntary black- out periods, as well as the associated increase in costs to the District to treat the increased flows. Mr. Anderson said that IRW D is charged for the amount of flow we treat and that we can refuse it if there is insufficient capacity available. Director Anderson asked that this policy to be reviewed and reconsidered. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on discussions at the CASA Legislative Committee meetings. An author is being sought to sponsor a statute in the state legislature that would authorize land application of biosolids as a state-wide interest. The Polanco bill that did not make it out of committee last year prohibited counties from banning land application of biosolids. Mr. Woodruff also mentioned that he prepared a memo for the directors addressing the issue of e- mails and Brown Act restrictions. While this form of communication between directors is allowed, e- mails can not be used to develop a consensus. There has been no movement on the Crow Winthrop case. The District was served with a lawsuit filed in federal court by an employee claiming racial discrimination. A claim was filed with the EEOC,which ruled that there was no basis for the lawsuit and it was denied. Counsel continues to work with The Irvine Company on an agreement to handle urban runoff flows from new development in Crystal Cove. Because this agreement is precedent setting, particular attention has been paid to issues of liability and indemnification,and future capital charges for I Minutes of the Steering Committee ' Page 4 January 24, 2001 discharges in excess of the 4 mgd currently authorized. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli reported that staff is developing a strawman proposal that will address the 2001 summer activities in an attempt to answer the question: is our plume hitting the shore as submitted by UCI Professor Stanley Grant. The estimated costs of these activities is between $1 million and $1.2 million plus staff time of about$400,000. One of the Items that will be reviewed is the proposed operational changes at the AES plant. It was announced that all meetings will be open to everyone. B. Public Information Update Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, introduced Sonja Wassgren, our new Public Information Coordinator. The public outreach on the varlous Huntington Beach activities were described. Ms. Lawson also listed the items that are on the horizon that has interested the media. Blake Anderson stated that a"Letter to the Citizens of Orange County' has been sent to both the Orange County Register and the Los Angeles Times editors about our plans through the summer. We've been told that the letters would be published. C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in February were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY The CASA Spring Conference is being held at the Tanaya Lodge in Fish Camp near Yosemite. Directors are to inform Jean Tappan if they plan to attend as rooms will be limited. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. t Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 January 24, 2001 (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for February 28, 2001 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for February 28, 2001 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m. ubmitted by: Je' V(� a "Tappan to ring Committee Secretary G'1 Wa�aWWW GpmmNmWlVsnWIZ401 SCMinu St / Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2001 —5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 7, 2001, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Don Bankhead David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Tony Kawashima Gary Streed, Director of Finance Mark A. Murphy Usa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Anna Piercy Usa Lawson, Communications Manager Paul Walker Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Directors Absent: Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Others Present: George Robertson, Senior Scientist Charles McGee, Laboratory Supervisor Dr. Stephen Weisberg Addana Renescu, Engineering Supervisor John Shaffer Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Maria Teresa Lozano Roydel Finder - Jim Sullivan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. a Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 February 7, 2001 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the December 6, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Directors Kawashima, McGuigan, Murphy and Piercy abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager, Blake Anderson, reported that the final draft financial study adopted by the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System had been mailed to all directors last week. The new directors' orientation scheduled for February 10 will discuss the project. In addition, all directors were welcome to attend the committee's meetings to be held at the Orange County Water District on February 22 at 5:30 p.m., and March 1 at 3:00 p.m. There is a Saturday workshop set for March 3 at 8:00 a.m. to be held at the Orange County Water District. The District's board meeting on March 28 would be a joint meeting with the Orange County Water District to take action on the go/no go decision for the project. Mr. Anderson, Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, and District engineering staff met with city of Yorba Linda staff to discuss areas of concern to the city and their residents regarding the impacts of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) relocation project. A rigorous community outreach plan is being implemented to apprise all citizens in the area the impact of this project. Approximately 60 different easements will need to be obtained from property owners within the city. The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), who owns 76% of the SARI line, has not yet found a source for funds or agreed to pay for their share of the cost. The original construction only estimate of$29 million has been updated to an estimate of$54 million. Blake Anderson and Chair Norm Eckenrode will be meeting with the SAWPA board on February 13 to discuss the project and the district's options. (Note: meeting has subsequently cancelled at request of SAWPA's chair.) The Cooperative Projects Program is entering its third year. A workshop was held on February 6 for city managers and publicworks directors to explain the program and discuss application process. This year's program will allow a total of$10 million in grants to be disbursed for inflow and infiltration projects. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance, Bob Ooten, announced his department met 100% compliance for the past year. The Association of Metropolitan Agencies will present the District an award for this achievement. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 February 7, 2001 Mr. Ooten also reported there were no reportable accidents for the month of January. He will present data on the success the District has had conserving energy in the future. He assured the directors both plants would likely meet the governor's request of an 8-9% reduction on energy use. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirelli, updated the directors on biosolids issues. The ordinance was approved in Kings County which will ban Class B biosolids after two years and Class A biosolids would need to be composted after five years. Mr. Ghirelli, District's General Counsel and Layne Baroldi met with the chief executive officer of Kings County and their general counsel. They are agreeable to considering amendments to the ordinance concerning some of those time limits. Staff is also looking into ways to offset the impact of increased costs to the biosolids management program. One possibility is to possibly purchase composting facilities in the District's watershed area. This item will be placed on the agenda for consideration next month. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (11) ACTIONITEMS a. OMTS01-01 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85: Dr. Stephen Weisberg, Director of Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), gave a presentation on the overall operations of SCCWRP. Their overall goal is to measure, evaluate and report on the health of the marine environment off the coast of southern California, and to evaluate the impacts of wastewater treatment plant discharges on water quality and public health. George Robertson, Senior Scientist, reported on the series of studies the district will begin in April and continue into early fall, which will help in determining O the hypothesis suggested by Dr. Stanley Grant regarding the Huntington Beach shoreline contamination investigation has any validity. His hypothesis suggests that there is an interaction between the AES power plant in Huntington Beach and offshore waters could somehow transport bacteria to the beach from the district's ocean outfall discharge plume. Bob Ghirelli requested the motion be amended to increase the total budget for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85, to$2,500,000. His request was denied. Directors entered into discussion and recommended that staff contact the County of Orange to assist the District with the funding of the studies. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 February 7, 2001 The OMITS Committee Directors were asked to consider the following action items to recommend to the Board of Directors: 1) Authorize a total budget for an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for consulting service agreements for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; 2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts with government agencies, universities and consulting companies qualified to carry out those contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase 111, Job No. J-85; and, 3) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with the United States Geological Survey to conduct all tasks associated with the design, installation, and collection of physical oceanographic data from fixed oceanographic moorings in an amount not to exceed $500,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly cared to approve staffs recommendation, and to amend the recommendation directing staff to contact the County of Orange to assist in the studies and funding of said studies, and further directed staff to took into obtaining federal funding for said studies. b. OMTS01-02 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract with BP Energy Company for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28, ending July 31, 2001, providing for an increase of$1,680,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,810,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly cared to approve staffs recommendation. C. OMTS01-03 Recommend to the Board of Directors to 1) Establish a budget of $480,000 for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297); and 2) Authorize the Purchasing Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source contract with US Filter Envirex for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297), for an amount not to exceed $360,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. d. OMTS01-04 Recommend to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee to approve the Five-Year Staffing and Business Plan, fiscal year 2000-01 to 2004-05. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 February 7, 2001 Blake Anderson gave a brief report on the proposed 5-year staffing plan that had been developed over the last several months. The plan requests an increase of approximately 4% in staff due to increasing regulatory issues, cooperative projects and an aggressive capital improvement program the District is undertaking. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS01-05: Environmental Management System for Biosolids No report was given on this item. b. OMTS01-06 Source Control Performance Indicators and Industry Outreach Program Adrian Renescu, an Engineering Supervisor in the Source Control Division, discussed a training program the District developed to educate industrial operators in proper waste management practices and operation and maintenance of pretreatment systems, at no cost to the industrial operators. John Shaffer, a consultant of EEC, reviewed how the program was developed. The committee then heard from Maria Teresa Lozano of Logi Graphics, Inc. of Huntington Beach and Roydel Pinder of All Metals Processing of Orange County located in Stanton, who spoke on the success they and their companies have experienced since completion of the first segment of the training program. C. OMTS01-07 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar for Preparation of the 2001-02 Budget Gary Streed gave a brief report on the status of the budget assumptions his staff was utilizing in the preparation of the 2001-02 Budget. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 6 February 7, 2001 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for March 7, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:48 p.m. Submitted by: �V-6., Penny M. Kkb Operations, Mainten ce and Technical Services Committee Secretary G9wp.dtatagendal0MTS@00112G0r OMTS Minutea1020701 MInulea.dae OMTS COMMITTEE MeeingMe To ea.nrDir. W/01 2/1aJ01 AGENDA REPORT ManNumes Ownmrnv 01,11TWI-01 12(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli,Director of Technical Services Originator: George Robertson, Senior Scientist Deirdre Hunter, Senior Environmental Specialist Charles McGee, Laboratory Supervisor SUBJECT: HUNTINGTON BEACH SHORELINE CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION, PHASE III, JOB NO. J-85 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Presentation by Dr. Stephen Weisberg, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) 2) Verbal report by Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services 3) Recommend to the Board of Directors to: a) Authorize a total budget for an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for consulting service agreements for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; b) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award sole source contracts with government agencies, universities and consulting companies qualified to carry out those contracts for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, Job No. J-85; and, c) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) to conduct all tasks associated with the design, installation, and collection of physical oceanographic data from fixed oceanographic moorings in an amount not to exceed $500,000. SUMMARY 1) SCCWRP Presentation On November 1, 2000, the Board approved the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) continuing participation in the SCCWRP for the next four years at an annual average cost of$306,000. The District is a founding member of the SCCWRP going back to its inception in 1969. The SCCWRP's overall goal is to measure, evaluate, and report on the health of the marine environment off the coast of southern California and DEH:wh:kmf Q: ftYWNNw1 IYaiGc Rip =l Beck Ap^ XtpN'O301 12(c)Gm rt : 1/ w«t Page 1 ' 9 , to evaluate the impacts of wastewater treatment plant discharges on water quality and public health. Dr. Stephen Weisberg, SCCWRP's Director, will provide information on some of SCCWRP's recent activities and the importance of this work to the District. 2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Investigation Update Beginning in late fall 2000, staff began planning the response to Dr. Stanley Grant's hypothesis that an interaction between the AES power plant in Huntington Beach and offshore waters could entrain and transport bacteria to the beach from our ocean outfall discharge plume. During the summer of 2001, the District will conduct a comprehensive and extensive study of the offshore and shoreline waters, currents and sediments off Huntington Beach to test the hypothesis. This work will add to the existing body of information we have compiled during the last 25 years on marine monitoring off the coast of Huntington Beach. 3) Oceanographic Service Contracts and Estimated Investigation Costs The District has taken the lead role in developing a series of studies to begin in April 2001 and continue into early fall. These studies will require the involvement of specialists with expertise in measuring, analyzing, and integrating oceanographic and coastal processes information and then interpreting the findings. The General Manager is requesting approval from the Board to negotiate several service contracts required to plan and perform the studies. The total requested budget for all the service contracts, including the $500,000 USGS sole-source, is $1 million. Staffs current estimate of the cost for the entire project, including the service contracts, is $1.62 million (see Table 2). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY 1) N/A: Information item only. 2) N/A: Information item only. 3) Not to exceed $1,000,000: BUDGET IMPACT . ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) DEH:wh:kmf G\ry,tlhlapaN4HwN I enC Rape l 6 rd A,Ma ReRftN] 1Wn 12(c).bc Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Presentation Overview Some of the SCCWRP's recent projects include measuring and modeling stormwater flows into the coastal environment and the impact of that flow on the beach. Other public health projects include (1) organizing two regional shoreline bacteria surveys that allow, for the first time, a comprehensive shoreline impact analyses, and (2) developing a model shoreline monitoring program. The SCCWRP has been a leader and innovator for the past 30 years in measuring the health of our local coastal oceans. The SCCWRP's leadership during the past two regional surveys (1994 and 1998) ensured that the measurement of the physical, chemical, and biological environmental indicators were done consistently by all participants. This allows the District, as well as any other ocean discharger, to compare local impacts in the context of regional conditions. Besides ensuring consistent measurement for data comparability between agencies, the SCCWRP has also been instrumental in evaluating what needs to be measured in an effective ocean monitoring program. The outcome of this multi-year effort was the model wastewater treatment plant monitoring program recommendations recently made to the SCCWRP Commission. Finally, all of this effort is of little use if no one knows about it. While the SCCWRP has kept up with this computer age of information transfer with their exceptional web site, they continue to foster face-to-face information exchange through their series of seminars conducted by well-known experts. 2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Investigation Update To be able to answer the questions regarding the District's plume, District staff has begun to design a series of studies. The general objectives for these studies are to determine: • Whether sewage-related bacteria are present in the nearshore region between the District's deep-water ocean outfall and the shore; • If the District's outfall is a source for these bacteria; and • The oceanographic or meteorological mechanisms that can transport the District's treated wastewater toward shore. These studies will be conducted by the District independent of the routine, permit- required monitoring. However, data from routine monitoring, as well as results from on- going or recently completed special studies will be used to supplement the findings and conclusions from the proposed studies. DEH:wh:kmf O'M NeW.,nW1BwN Ip^^Jv Rero�V W1 BeeN RG^^e+ReFbbal.1](n).Jrc RaiwE. ,mm nm, Page 3 The proposed studies consist of several integrated and complimentary components, including current measurements, water column sampling, and sediment and mussel sampling for specific tracers such as detergent components unique to sewage. Current measurements are useful for characterizing the magnitude and direction of plume transport during periods when onshore transport is most likely. Water column sampling will be used to characterize horizontal and vertical distributions of water quality parameters as indicators of the wastewater plume, as well as describing the vertical density structure of the water column. Sediment sampling along with mussel tissue deployments will provide time-integrated measurements of water quality, including chemical markers for sewage, over multiple tidal cycles, which can not be practically sampled by single point measurements. The proposed studies will be discussed at the first Technical Advisory Committee (TAG) meeting, which is scheduled for January 29, 2001. The TAG consists of individuals representing a broad range of backgrounds including, local stakeholders, regulators, academics, consultants, interested environmental groups, and the general public. Staff will present the offshore sampling proposal discussed above and incorporate the TAG's comments into the final sampling plan. 3) Oceanographic Service Contracts and Overall Project Costs The District is taking the lead in developing and carrying out these studies, in collaboration with other government agencies and university researchers that are focusing on other possible sources for the elevated shoreline bacteria (e.g., onshore sources or flow from Talbert Marsh and Santa Ana River). These studies will be conducted during the periods which, based on previous investigations, have been most- frequently associated with elevated bacterial levels. The studies are scheduled to begin this spring. We expect that the proposed studies will be comprehensive enough so that, in the event the results do not indicate the wastewater discharge is the source for the bacteria, further speculation regarding possible mechanisms for the District's offshore source would not be warranted. That is, the studies are being designed to conclusively identify or eliminate the District's plume as a possible offshore source. Scientific Studies Service Contracts While the District is taking the lead in these investigations and in-house personnel will do portions of the studies, staff recommends that several scientific studies service contracts be created for program design, field sampling, sample analysis, data analysis, integration, and reporting. The groups identified in Table 1 below represent a pool of talent from which the District can select the appropriate expertise necessary to carry out those portions of the proposed studies that cannot be done in-house. Because of the very short turn-around time needed to prepare these studies for this summer, and the specific expertise needed to do them, staff has determined that using the District's standard approval processes of separate funding approvals for each contract is simply not possible. Instead, approving a general funding amount for the studies and Board authorization to negotiate with the companies listed for specific scopes-of-work for each service contract will streamline and shorten the process. DEH:wh:kmf G Mq.GmWpwtivlBVN�v Rtyvh]W1 BwN AymN RpwleWAlVbn 1311 Joc Reive]. ,rva, 1 Page 4 USGS Sole Source As part of the District's efforts to address the hypothesis that the treated wastewater plume is being transported toward shore where it can then interact with the discharge from the AES Huntington Beach power generation plant, extensive oceanographic measurements will need to be collected this spring and summer. These measurements will be taken from a series of moored instrument platforms located from the District's ouffall (4.5 miles offshore) to as close to the shoreline as possible. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is a world leader in the natural sciences. They are the nation's premier scientific organization whose mission is to describe and understand the Earth's processes to better manage our natural resources and enhance and protect our quality of life. The USGS's Western Region Coastal and Marine Geology, located in Menlo Park, California, has been studying coastal physical oceanographic processes off southern California (Santa Monica Bay) to determine how the regional currents and the associated transport of sediment and pollutants affects the selection of offshore disposal sites. This work has included predictions of transport pathways for polluted sediment, the role submarine canyons play on the exchange of nutrients and other materials between the coast and deeper ocean and modeling. At this time the USGS is uniquely qualified and stands ready to develop a rigorous and scientifically defensible oceanographic study to investigate the District's ouffall as a source of shoreline bacterial contamination in Huntington Beach. Recommendation The General Manager recommends that a budget of$1,000,000 be established and that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate scientific studies service contracts with the groups listed in Table 1 without having to return to the Board to approve each contract. In addition, the General Manager recommends that he be authorized to negotiate a sole source contract with the USGS in an amount not to exceed $500,000. Staff will exercise diligence in managing the project and controlling costs. Status reports on the costs, schedule, and results of the studies will be reported at all Steering and OMTS meetings. Table 1. Pool of agencies, institutions and companies for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Invests ation Phase III Group Contact Address U.S. Geological Survey Marlene Noble USGS MS-999 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park CA 94025 University of California, Indira Venkatesan 5863 Slichter Hall Los Angeles Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 University of California, Keith Stolzenbach Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering Los Angeles 5732C Boelter Hall Los An eles, CA 90095-1593 University of California, Walter Lick Department of Mechanical and Environmental Santa Barbara Engineering Engineering II Bldg., Room 2355 Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5070 DEH:wh:kmf O:M'vemlpaW,Buie bsnm nwdvwl BwN bens Froulbm,xsn R(cl.e: Page 5 Table 1. Pool of agencies, institutions and companies for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investi ation Phase III University of California, Ube Washburn Geography Department Santa Barbara Ellison Hall 3611 Santa Barbara CA 931064060 University of Califomia, Stanley Grant Chem/Biochem Eng &Matrls Sci Irvine Irvine CA 92697-2175 Scripps Institution of Clinton Winant Center for Coastal Studies Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla CA 92093-0209 University of Southern Phyllis Grifman University Park California Sea Grant Los Angeles, CA 90089.0373 Southern California Steve Weisberg 7171 Fenwick Lane Coastal Water Research Westminster, CA 92863 Project Science Applications Andrew Ussner 4770 Eastgate Mall Road, Mail Slop X-1 International Corporation San Diego, CA 92121 MEC Analytical Systems, Arthur Barnett 2433 Impala Drive Inc. Carlsbad CA 92009 Tetra Tech Thomas Grieb 3746 Mt. Diablo Road, Suite 300 Lafayette, CA 94549 CRG Marine Laboratories, Richard Gossett 820 South Seaside Avenue Inc. Terminal Island CA 90731 Applied Biomonitoring Michael Salazar 11648- 72nd Place NE Kirkland WA 98034 Seavisual Consulting, Inc., Terry Sullivan P.O. Box 1056 Ashland OR 97520 Applied Ocean Science Burt Jones 3579 E. Foothill Blvd, PMB 227 Pasadena, CA 91107 Sea Systems Terry Hendricks 840 Bonita Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 Moffatt& Nichol Engineers Chris Webb 250 West Wardlow Road Long Beach, CA 90807 Overall Project Costs The estimated overall_project costs are outlined below in Table 2. These costs are based on staffs initial draft proposal that the TAC will be reviewing on January 29, 2001. OMTS and the Board will be updated as more information regarding the project's scope, schedule, and costs becomes available. Approximately 4-5 FTEs are anticipated to be required to carry out this work program. A higher number of staff and contract help will be needed during the peak summer sampling months and lesser numbers at other times of the year. DEHwh,kmf O�l M�Repvh RttvbYl101Van 13 C).% R.:..e 1m 1 M ) Page 6 Table 2 District's Estimated Phase III Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Costs (Nov.2000-Dec.2001) Estimated Cost Phase III Professional Services Contracts $ 1,000,000 USGS Mooring Study $ 500,000 Various external assistance with design, implementation, and reporting of studies. $ 500,000 Laboratory Materials (700 samples per survey times approx. 10 surveys) $ 200,000 District Staff Time (estimated 500-1000 hours per month) (assumed Dec. 2000 average cost per hour multiplied oy 750 Hours per month for 12 months) $ 420,000 Total Initial Phase III Estimate $ 1,620,006 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A DEH:wh:kmf c+w.emw�mn pma.aro�umi m.b b«d•aw�mmV�M,)e Rw 1m M) Page OMTS COMMITTEE Meeareoare Toxsm. 2P/01 Z128/01 AGENDA REPORT 1O MMW nem numoer OMIW 1-01 12(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Dave Halverson, Senior Electrical Engineer SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF NATURAL GAS, SPECIFICATION NO. 9900-28 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. 9900-28 with BP Energy Company, ending July 31, 2001, providing for an increase of$1,680,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,810,000. SUMMARY Natural gas is primarily used in the Central Generation facilities at both plants to produce the electricity needed for the wastewater treatment facilities. The treatment plants budgeted $1,130,000 for the purchase of gas this year. Staff is requesting an increase to the current contract that ends July 31, 2001. The natural gas markets have seen an unprecedented increase in unit prices starting last spring. The average market price for gas at the California border has increased over 530%. The District historically paid about $3 per unit of gas purchased. Current costs are over $16.00 per unit. Staff has taken steps to limit the impact of these price increases by locking in a portion of our needs and by reducing consumption. However the magnitude of the market increases cannot be absorbed in the existing budget or contract amount. District staff has developed two new operation strategies. The first strategy, implemented in December 2000 is to reduce natural gas consumption. This first strategy is accomplished by reducing the output of the Central Generation facilities and buying additional electricity from Edison to make up the difference. This operational strategy reduces the overall cost of operating the treatment plants because it is less expensive to buy electricity than make it. In mid January a second operational strategy was developed to handle the Stage Three Electrical emergencies. This second strategy was developed to support our local community and the state-wide electrical system. During the Stage Three Electrical emergencies, the District increase the purchase of natural gas to eliminate electricity consumption at the treatment plants. The power not imported averages 2 megawatts or enough power for 2,000 homes. Unfortunately, additional natural gas is consumed during the Stage Three emergency in order to avoid imported (purchased) electricity. Even though we will spend more for operating the plant, this operating strategy reduces the demand on the California electrical system and supports our local communities. c wy w�vemaeo.m penes ae�nrzoot ewm ovens.aeownmorvu �z10aoc The current contract with BP Energy Company, in the amount of$1,130,000, is requested to be increased by $1,680,000 for a total contract price of$2,810,000 in order to cover the estimated increases in natural gas purchases. This request for an amendment to the natural gas procurement contract needs to be viewed in the context of the whole energy management system. The purchase of natural gas and electricity, as well as, the power plant operational strategies affect the expenditure for both commodities. Staff continues to monitor the electric and gas markets and will continue to optimize purchases in order to contain costs. Additional information on the electricity budget is outlined in the additional information section of this report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The current contract for natural gas procurement expires July 31, 2001. The natural gas cost increase results from dramatic increases in the market cost of gas. The historical cost of gas is shown on an attached table. District staff budgeted $ 1,130,000 for this fiscal year. Based on the year-to-date costs and estimates based on the gas futures market, staff anticipates the District will spend $1,680,000 over budget amount. Refer to the attached graph showing last years costs and the estimates of costs for this year. At this writing, staff anticipates being continuously in Stage Three emergencies through February. The additional cost for natural gas is estimated to be approximately$373,000 through this period. As information, the electricity saved by operating at full Central Generation capacity during a Stage Three emergency is $155,000. In other words, the cost for supporting our local community during the period through February is $218,000. Staff is continuing to monitor the gas market and will continue to reduce consumption in order to reduce expenditures and contain costs. The increased gas prices have resulted from increased demand for fuel in the western stales while supply has decreased. The District purchases gas from a commodity marketer and pays for the gas and the transportation of the gas to the District. Natural gas prices are currently very volatile and widely fluctuate. Staff is reviewing alternatives for procuring professional expertise to counsel and advise on the purchase of this commodity. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Une hem: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) cnm m�w,wm..a ryerw aewawoi mam�e•w q+[�`U.V IUen iz(m eoc ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Electrical Budget Information The District uses energy for powering buildings, the treatment facilities and collections systems. This energy is in the form of electricity or natural gas. Natural gas and digester gas is used to produce electricity in the District's Power Generation facilities. In addition to energy, the District purchases standby electrical services from Edison Company, our local electrical utility company, in the unlikely event of a Central Generation outage or for yearly routine maintenance. Historically, the natural gas prices allowed the District to produce electricity at less cost than for buying it from Edison. With the high natural gas prices, electricity is currently less expensive to purchase from Edison than to produce on-site with natural gas. Therefore, to minimize operating costs and control expenditures, staff has elected to reduce natural gas consumption and purchase the electricity needed beyond that being presently generated. The very high gas prices started in December and are expected to continue through February. Staff will continue to monitor the pricing for gas and electricity and select the combinations that result in lowest costs without sacrificing the availability of reliable power for plant processes. One exception to this operating strategy deals with Stage Three electrical emergency conditions. During Stage Three conditions, the District will cease importing electricity in order to support our local community and the statewide electrical system. The District budgeted $921.000 for electricity and electricity standby services and $1,130,000 for natural gas. The natural gas markets have seen an unprecedented increase in unit prices starting last spring. The average market price for natural gas purchased by the District has increased over 530%. The District historically paid about $3 per unit of gas purchased. Current costs are over$16.00 per unit. Staff has taken steps to limit the impact of these price increases by locking in a portion of our needs and by reducing consumption. Until this month, electricity prices have been frozen under the terms of deregulation. However, in the current California energy crisis electricity prices have also increased by 15-percent, starting this month. The District historically paid a marginal cost of 6.5 cents per unit of electricity and is currently paying 7.5 cents. The current budget amount for electricity is approximately $921,000. During the effort to reduce natural gas expenditures, electricity was purchased. Even though this action reduces natural gas expenditures, the electricity budget is adversely impacted. It is anticipated that the District will spend $1,076,000 on electricity this year. The electricity expenditure is based on importing electricity when it is cheaper than buying natural gas. As previously mentioned, electricity will not be purchased during a Stage Three electrical emergency. The additional cost for electricity, when importing two mega- watts, is $3,600 per day. The additional cost for natural gas when not importing electricity is $8,300 per day for a net cost of$4,700 per day. Electricity was purchased before the Stage Three emergencies started. The additional power expenditures required are $101,000 for December and $54,000 for January. Based on the year-to-date and future cost estimates for natural gas and electricity, staff GM tlhV2ENi�2 fllpMb1 BmN�PnVuti 'A 12(�d anticipates the District will spend $155,000 over the current budget amount for electricity (in lieu of natural gas). Staff is continuing to monitor the electric and gas markets and will continue to optimize expenditures for these commodities in order to contain costs. Due to the type of procurement for electricity service, Board action is not required for contract amendments. However, operating budgets will be adversely impacted. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS Graphs titled: 1. "History of Natural Gas Market Prices" 2. "Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Natural Gas Budget Status (2000/2001) 1vq.EmWperYP9mN hpN"FgoY11W1 BwN�panO Ne�atlblplNen 13�R�.Ep History of Natural Gas Market Pricing (Based on "Natural Gas Intellegence" bidweek average for each month for the Southern CA Border) 17 15 c 13 n E r c N 0 `u a C m 3 1 GfxydlaWNAPO�esaueMGfHDA56Y3tgY01 WSLonlrad Manemenl Rev FnalS as Plant No. 1 and 2 Natural Gas Budget Status (2000/2001) 3000000 -- -- -.. - - -- 2500000 ---- — +1999 Actual Costs 2000000 - --- - - 1500000 -- -- -- — -- -®-Projected FY 2000/01 Cost Without Stage 3 1000000 --- --- - — --- — —f—Projected FY2000/01 500000 Cost With Extended Stage 3 0 July Sept Nov Jan March May Gsxy dlabm 20W,a arUGENOASFY 20001 Gas C aad Amendment Rev Flnal5 am OMTS COMMITTEE Meedng0 Toee.anr. AGENDA REPORT IbemNumber IMM Number OMTSDI-03 1Ne1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mark Esquer, Manager of Process Engineering SUBJECT: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TWO PLANT NO. 1 ACTIVATED SLUDGE CLARIFIERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget of$480,000 for Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant No. 1 Activated Sludge Clarifiers (Specification No. E- 297); (2) Adopt Resolution No. 01-06, authorizing specifications calling for a specific make and model of equipment in order that a field test may be conducted to determine the product's suitability for future use, as authorized by California Public Contract Code Section 3400(b); and, (3) Authorize the Purchasing Manager to negotiate and enter into a Sole Source contract with US Filter Envirex for the Purchase and Installation of Mechanical Equipment for Plant no. 1 Activated Clarifiers (Specification No. E-297), for an amount not to exceed $360,000. SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to request the purchase, installation and trial of needed mechanical equipment for operation of secondary clarifiers at the Plant No. 1 activated sludge facility. Fourteen of twenty-four secondary clarifiers are the original units built during 1978. The mechanical equipment used to handle and remove solids from these fourteen original units are reaching the end of their useful fife. The mechanical equipment in all fourteen original clarifiers will be replaced during a major rehabilitation project that is scheduled for completion by 2005. Two of the original fourteen clarifier units are now in need of new equipment. Until now, only one vendor has provided the clarifier equipment used at the District of a type and quality to meet our standards of reliability and serviceability. A second vendor, US Filter Envirex brand, now manufactures this type of equipment. Staff believes it may be of sufficient quality to warrant its consideration for long term and wide spread use in our facilities. Since the equipment in two of the clarifiers must be replaced now, prior to the rehabilitation project, District staff would like to test this second brand of GMp.Em.w^a.u�we A Aa FW =lB MAp R"�Il lXel.� Pagel mechanical equipment by placing it into those units. This would provide a two to three-year period for evaluating the new equipment during the development and design of the rehabilitation project. District staff recommends that the mechanical equipment for the two secondary clarifiers be replaced with Envirex brand equipment. This action also requires that a sole-source contract be negotiated and entered into with US Filter Envirex through our local supplier. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approval is being requested for capital funds in the amount of$480,000. The requested funds have not been budgeted under this fiscal year's capital outlay. A transfer of funds from other Capital Improvements projects is being requested in order to cover the cost of this project. Project budgets will then be adjusted during the next fiscal year budget process. This action will not impact the current year budget as the current year Capital Improvement outlay of funds is expected to fall below the budgeted amounts. The project cost comprises District staff labor, a supplier contract, and a contingency. The breakdown includes $80,000 for staff labor (including purchase, project coordination, inspection, and project performance monitoring), $320,000 for a construction contractor and mechanical equipment, and an $80,000 contingency ($40,000 for District resources and $40,000 for construction). Pro act Scope The project scope will consist of: • Ordering the appropriate parts from the equipment manufacturer • Requiring the equipment supplier to remove the existing equipment and replace them with new equipment • Utilizing Orange County Sanitation District staff to specify, procure, and oversee the installation of the equipment. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A request is being made to create a budget for this project, in the amount of $480,000. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NA G F �Fery .l& .A,—N N•pyY'OA1Nsn,]a)Mc Page 2 ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not sole source a contract to US Filter Envirex and competitively (open) bid the equipment, materials, and installation. This alternative would achieve the goal of replacing the equipment, resulting in operational secondary clarifiers. However there is not a guarantee that the Envirex brand equipment by US Filter would be supplied with the low bid. Additionally, an increase in funds would be required for the preparation of plans and specifications, by a consultant. The plans and specification would be required in order to competitively bid the equipment. The extra cost to prepare plans and specification is estimated at $50,000. 2. Do not repair the clarifier equipment. This alternative would leave two secondary clarifiers unavailable for treatment purposes. Staff recommends against this alternative. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a maintenance type capital project, for an existing facility and is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 (Class 1). ATTACHMENTS MAE:ct G Fxp.Eb�cpxtiv�BmN/Y^Mufiery b1A01 Bm0/ .Repab`MOIUbn 131e)hr Page DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUC ION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, February 1, 2001, at 5 p.m. . A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, February 1,2001, at 5 p.m., in the Districfs Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Russell Patterson,Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Guy Carroao Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Brian Donahue Bob Oolen, Director of Operations& Beth Krom Maintenance Tod Ridgeway Gary Streed, Director of Finance Gerald Sigler Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Lisa Lawson, Communication Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General Manager Directors Absent: Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager None John Linder, Construction Manager Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor William Cassidy, Project Manager Andrei loan, Project Manager Dennis May, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Dawes, GWRS Project Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. m PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 February 1,2001 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the December 7, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson reported that the May 3 PDC Committee meeting conflicts with the CASA Conference and a date change will be considered at the March meeting. The Chair reported a need to add two items to the closed session, needing immediate action which arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: (1)Confer, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8, with the District's Real Property Negotiators, David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering; Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor, and William Cassidy, Project Engineer,to consider the possible acquisition of real property to relocate an existing pump station,which is part of Contract No. 5-52, the 'A'Street Pump Station; and (2) Confer, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8,with the Districts Real Property Negotiators, David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering; Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor; and William Cassidy, Project Engineer, to consider the possible acquisition of existing wastewater pipelines and accompanying easement rights,which are part of Contract No. 2-2-1, Carbon Canyon Pipeline. The Chair stated that these items could be added pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), upon a two-thirds' vote of the Committee. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To: 1) Find that the matters arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda, pursuant to authority of California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and 2)Add two closed session items, as Items Nos. 17(1)(a)and 17(1)(b), to the agenda, to wit: Confer with real property negotiators, David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering; Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager; Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor;and William Cassidy, Project Engineer,to instruct for price,terms,and conditions for the purchase, sale, exchange,or lease of subject property. The property location is at the comer of Balboa Boulevard and 'A' Street, in the City of Newport Beach. The negotiating parties are the Orange County Sanitation District and the owner of the property(pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8); and Confer with real property negotiators, David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering, Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager; Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor,and William Cassidy, Project Engineer, to instruct for price,terms, and conditions for the purchase, sale,exchange, or lease of subject properly. The property relates to possible acquisition of existing wastewater pipelines and accompanying easement rights, which is part of Contract No. 2-2-1, Carbon Canyon Pipeline. The negotiating parties are the Orange County Sanitation District and the owner of the property(pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8). y PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 February 1, 2001 Mr. Anderson welcomed two new members Directors Beth Krom, Irvine,and Tod Ridgeway, Newport Beach,to the meeting. Directors Alice Jempsa, Los Alamitos, Tony Kawashima, Tustin, and Peer Swan, Newport Beach have also been assigned to the Committee by Board Chair Norm Eckenrode but were not in attendance. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that the third cycle of the Cooperative Projects program is underway. A workshop is scheduled for February 6 for city managers and public work directors to explain the program and discuss the application process. An audit and assessment of the program's first two years is underway. Mr. Anderson reported that there was a kick-off meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee this week on the Huntington Beach Summer 2001 studies. Several studies are being designed to answer the question: Is it or is it not the Sanitation District's outfall plume? Activities to improve groundwater in the region's upper water shed were discussed. A demonstration project that will treat washwater from nine dairies is underway. The connection of the first dairy farts has been completed. This is a joint effort with the counties of San Bernardino, Riverside,Orange County, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the dairies. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported that the five pumps recently installed in the Main Street Pump Station have experienced problems with cavitation. It has been determined that there was an error in the design calculations and the designer, Boyle Engineering, has agreed to redesign the installation and replace the pumps at its expense. No-cost reimbursement and professional services agreements will be presented to the directors at a future meeting. Doug Stewart provided an explanation of the difference in contractor's field and office mark-up rates that had been questioned a director. Chris Cervellone reported that a stop work notice has been given to the contractor on the project to Install a new metering structure on the 120-inch effluent outfall. A team of experts reviewed the contractor's proposed method and because of possible Impacts to both the 78-inch and 120-inch outfalls and the condition of the soil under the outfalls, It was decided that the best approach would be to redesign the entire structure. Estimated costs of the new design and for stopping the work are still being evaluated. The options under consideration are: 1)issue a change order to the contractor to perform the new design work,or 2)terminate the contract and re-bid the new design. In an effort to streamline the process,the directors directed staff to select the most cost-effective option and proceed with implementation. Board Chair Norm Eckenrode asked for an update on standby power during the current energy crisis. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, Indicated that the treatment plants are in good shape. The central power generation systems at both plants can handle the power needs, though some natural gas is purchased. Edison power is third in line as a supplier. There are also portable standby generators available for the treatment plants and the outlying pumping stations. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 February 1, 2001 (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. Construction Manager John Linder reviewed the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there was one PSA and two addenda approved by the General Manager between November 22, 2000 and January 17, 2001. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval are taken separately. (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that one addendum was approved by the General Manager since the last report. (12) QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there are currently five contract employees with three vacant positions. Directors Krom and Ridgeway arrived. (13) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Project Manager Andrei loan updated the directors on recent activities. The preliminary design is complete. It Included an updated construction cost estimate of$54 million. Staff has submitted plans and details to the railroad for review. Applications for an encroachment permit from Yorba Linda are being prepared. General Counsel has provided direction on procuring right-of-way easements using a right-of-way agents opinion of value instead of formal appraisals. This process will require Board approval and will be considered at the February 28 Board meeting. Staff continues to work with SAWPA on financing their portion of the project. Chair Eckenrode and Blake Anderson will be meeting with the SAWPA Board on February 13 to discuss the project and our options. The Committee members expressed their concern about the 50 percent increase in project cost from the originally estimated $29 million. Staff will prepare a detailed explanation for the increased cost for both the PDC Committee and the Board in March. A value engineering workshop is scheduled for March 5, and the goal is to find ways to decrease costs. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 February 1, 2001 Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, updated the committee on public outreach activities. A letter explaining the project was mailed to 3500 residents of the area. Letters have been sent to the 69 property owners explaining the need for easements through their property. A public meeting is scheduled in Yorba Linda on February 21. As changes occur that impact the construction, notices will be provided to the residents. (14) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM IGWRS) STATUS REPORT Tom Dawes, GW RS Project Manager, briefed the members on the actions at the last Joint Cooperative Committee meeting. The final draft of the financial study has been submitted by PRAG and will be distributed to the Directors no later than Monday. The main question that must be answered by the OCWD directors is what the project will do to the replenishment assessment charge and will that Board take action to support it. Mr. Dawes announced the dates and discussion topics for future meetings. The go/no go decision on the project is scheduled for March 28. (15) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-j) a. PDC01-01 Recommend to the Board of Directors to Ratify Change Order No.7 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and 0 at Plant No.2, Job No. 132-39,with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$221,581 and 30 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$10,549,632. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. b. PDC01-02 Ratify Change Order No.4 to Chemical Facility Modifications,Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent,Job No.J-53,with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$75,614, increasing the total contract amount to$2,603,847. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the change order. Director Ridgeway abstained. C. PDC01-03 Recommend to the Board of Directors to accept Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Plant No.2, Job No. SP2000-20, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 February 1,2001 d. PDC01-04 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. to conduct a Value Engineering workshop and prepare a Value Engineering study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41,for an amount not to exceed $57,759. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carded to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. e. PDC01-05 (1)Approve plans and specifications for Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;and (3)Award a construction contract to Mike Prlich and Sons, Incorporated for Junction Structure Upgrade,Job No. SP2000-29,for an amount not to exceed $188,700 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. Director Ridgeway abstained. f. PDC01-06 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$222,500 for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80,for a total project budget of $1,124,500; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;and (3)Award a construction contract to Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc.for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80,for an amount not to exceed $897,339. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. g. PDC01-07 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget of $354,815 for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance,Job No. J-25-6; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25-6,for an amount not to exceed $294,815. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. ° PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 February 1, 2001 h. PDC01-08 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design engineering services for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, for an additional amount of$54,652, increasing the total amount not to exceed $112,237. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Ridgeway abstained. I. PDC01-09 Recommend to the Board of Directors to continue to proceed with the original definition of Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, as recommended by the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Coordinating Committee, and do not proceed with the Irvine Ranch Water District alternate phasing proposal. Tom Dawes discussed the reasons the Joint Coordinating Committee recommended continuing the studies based on the original definition of Phase 1. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. j. PDC01-10 Recommend to the Finance, Administration,and Human Resources (FAHR)Committee to approve the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan,fiscal year 2000-01 to 2004-05. Blake Anderson presented the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan as an information item. It will be considered by the Board at - its February 28 meeting. The justification for the increase in staff was described by the department heads and the plan was accepted as drafted. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (16) INFORMATIONAL ITEM a. PDC01-11 Receive the 2001-02 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar, approved by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee in December 2000. There was no discussion on this item. PDC Committee Minutes { Page 8 February 1, 2001 (17) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 7.29 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Cade Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Items Nos. 17(1)(a)and 17(1)(b). The Committee reconvened in regular session at 7:45 p.m. (18) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (20) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Director Tod Ridgeway asked that the Committee members consider moving the meeting start time to 5:30 p.m. This request will be considered at the March meeting. (21) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 1, 2001 at 5 p.m. The date for the May PDC Committee meeting will be agendized for consideration at the March meeting. (22) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Submitted by: ea Tappan Committee Secretary nrn.auopmewmxoorvnin�wwmio�roc Mnmunac PDC COMMITTEE Ong To ad.of Din 2/1/01 3/2a/o1 AGENDA REPORT Bw Number Rem W.nW PDCU1-01 13(<) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$221,581 and 30 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,549,632. SUMMARY Change Order No. 7 includes one item of added work to Job No. P2-39. There are no omissions or errors associated with this Change Order. Liquidated damages on this job are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Dale October 26, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 24, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 7 Current Contract Completion Date April 28, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 680,451.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 221,581.00 Change Orders to Date $ 902.032.00 Percentage Increase to Date 9.35% Amended Contract Price $ 10,549,632.00 Note: Change Order No. 2 in the amount of$552,000 included hauling and land application of dried biosolids obtained during the digester cleaning process not included in this contract. The original plan was to haul and dispose of the dried biosolids under a separate contract. Change Order No. 2 resulted in cost savings of$111,180 to the District. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 6 would be 3.63% without Change Order No. 2. R.n..a. ermae Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (section e,Page 85) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. 132-39 includes the rehabilitation of seven digesters at Plant No. 2. The rehabilitation includes cleaning accumulated grit from digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heal loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester domes, and upgrading digester control systems. Lee and Ro and Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction Inc. on August 25, 1999. The contract is now 60% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 7 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Motor Control Center (MCC), Remote $221,581 30 Design Input/Output (1/0) Terminal, and Change Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Programming Modifications Total Change Order No. 7 $221,581 30 Item No. 1 includes work to modify MCCs, remote 1/0 terminals, and PLC programming. These modifications will: 1. Create more space in new MCCs, which will be required on future projects. 2. Improve safety and provide Maintenance Staff a uniform means to troubleshoot circuits. 3. Provide Operations Staff a more efficient method to manage biosolids. Details of this work are described in the attached Change Order. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District's guidelines, Section 15301 (B). The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998 R. a Page 2 ATTACHMENTS J 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order Ago- Page 3 G ' BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I,J,K,L,M,N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-39 l8t5i1 a � eI iiY ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED *7 Fy $.+,, :,AbTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL E%PENbI�fb L , BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ME Project Development Studies/Permiffin Consultant PSA $ 1.045.000 $ 995,000 $ 995,000 $ 854,810 $ 854,810 $ 436,613 51% Design Staff $ 130,000 $ 343,800 $ 343.800 $ 343,800 $ 343,800 $ 343,800 100% Construction Contract $ 9,875,000 $10,668.699 $10,668,600 $ 10,328,051 $ 221.581 $ 10,549.632 $ 6,469,145 61% Construction(other) $ 446,000 $ 446.000 $ 446.000 It 446,000 $ 511,750 115% Construction Staff $ 50,000 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 601,538 37% .Contingency $ 3,144,000 $ 3,144,00( PROJECT TOTAL $ 11,100,000 $17,234,000 $17,234,000 $ 13,+261 $ 221.581 1 $ 13,830,842 $ 8,362,846 60% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 11,100,000 1 $17,234.000 $17,234,000 $ 13,609,261 1 $ 221,581 $ 13,830.842 $ 8,362,848 1 60A b:P,dtalsrNllobmnd wntrada/p2-3ftWgat tade2000co47 F.Rind Od,4,2000 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 Job Number P2-39 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS( (DAYS( CONTRACT 08/25/1999 $ 9,647,600 $ 9,647,600 730 730 CO NO. 1• 03/28/2000 $ (142,344) $ 9,505,256 -1.48% 72 802 CO NO. 2 04/26/2000 $ 552,000 $ 10,057,256 4.25% 0 802 CO NO. 3• 07/06/2000 $ 70,815 $ 9,986,441 3.51% 0 802 CO NO. 4•' 07/06/2000 $ 91,834 $ 10,078,275 4.46% 56 858 CO NO. 5 10/25/2000 $ 196,994 $ 10,275,269 6.51% 28 886 CO NO. 6" 12/07/2000 $ 52,782 $ 10,328,051 7.05% 0 886 CO NO. 7 Pending $ 221.581 $ 10,549,632 9,35% 30 916 'Approval by GM per delegated authority by Board Reaolullon 99.23 '-PDC Approval C%TEMP. 7 amlua ReMmAslshMi Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: February 28, 2001 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I, J, K, L M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $221,581.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —MOTOR CONTROL CENTER (MCC), REMOTE INPUT/OUTPUT(1/0)TERMINAL, AND PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER (PLC) PROGRAMMING MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform the following work: A. Modifications to MCCs and Field Control Panels (FCP) at the following locations: MCC-W at Digesters N and 0, MCC-M at Digesters I and K, and MCC-DW inside the Dewatering Building. The remote 110 terminal cabinet contents shall be relocated from the MCCs (W, M, and DW)to a wall mounted Field Control Panel (FCP). The control panels were originally located in the MCC to allow for factory wiring. This change will free up space (for combination starters, transformers and other electrical equipment) in the MCCs for use on future projects. Space saved in the MCCs as a result of this change will be utilized to install starters (and other electrical equipment)to run HVAC units in the pump room. Cost of this change is $30,217.00 B. Chopper mixing pump controls (total of ten at MCC-U and W) and sludge recirculating pump controls (total of seven at MCC-M, U, and W)wiring schematics were modified to comply with the District's current standards that are in the process of being finalized. District's standards are being standardized for the following reasons: i. Uniform control schematics will better aid maintenance staff to trouble shoot circuits and perform maintenance work. ii. Uniform control schematics will enhance safety during lockout and tagout by assuring consistent wiring terminations and controls. iii. Uniform control schematics will better conform to software template development. The internal wiring, PLC input/output, PLC program, and the operator graphics will match and be uniform. The work includes additions and modifications to field wiring and factory wiring to seventeen pumps at three different locations. This work also includes the addition of twelve digital input (DI) points to the seal water pressure monitoring system and costs for revising shop drawings and as built drawings. The average cost of control modifications to each pump is $6500. Cost of this change is$110,507.00 Page 2 of 4 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: February 28, 2001 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. C. Exhaust fan control schematics modifications—This change was for the exhaust fans(total of 9 fans inside 9 individual MCC rooms)to turn on automatically when power is restored after a power failure. The current design requires that the exhaust fans be turned on manually after power is restored. During the design of this project the MCC electrical rooms were classified as Class I Div ll. However during the construction Phase of this project, Job Number J-35-2 reclassified these _ rooms as unclassified. Therefore the controls for exhaust fans were modified to automatically turn back on after a power failure. This change was required to eliminate Operator staff time involved with exhaust fan restarting. The work includes additions and modifications to field wiring and factory wiring to the MCCs and exhaust fans. The cost for this change includes work for revising the shop drawings and as built drawings. Cost of this change is $54,786.00 D. Programming changes to CRISP and PLC for TWAS and primary sludge feed to digesters. The programming changes includes alarms for exceeding set points for digester feed (volume or time), and for the operator to enter the true changing volume of the digester in the CRISP software (as in the case of grit build up in the bottom of the digester). This is a design change and was requested by Operations Staff to better manage biosolids and provide the required detention time to comply with EPA biosolids regulations. Cost of this change is$26,071.00 This item is on the critical path of the construction schedule and a time extension of 30 days is necessary for the District and the Contractor to review changes and for the increase in lead-time for the MCCs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Plan Change No. 10 and Margate's letter dated December 16, 2000. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $221,581.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $221,581.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 30 Calendar Days j Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: February 28, 2001 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 30 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 30 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 186 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 916 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 28, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Prev . Authorized Changes $ 680,451.00 This Change (Add) (Dedust) $ 221,581.00 Amended Contract Price $10,549,632.00 Page 4of4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: February 28, 2001 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Board Authorization Date: February 28, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date WWoMdatai\wp.dtMengUOBS&CONTRACTSN2.39Tonstmction Mgmt RWXChange Ordem=Tdoc PDCCOMMI7TEE Me[ ngD*e To ad.ofDir. • 02/01/01 02/28/01 AGENDA REPORT Rem Numw Item WMw VDO01-03 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF RECLAIMED WATER LINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. SP2000-20 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-20, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. SUMMARY The contract is 100% complete. Margate Construction, Inc. concluded the job prior to the completion date. There are no change orders on this job. Contract Start Date August 22, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date November 19, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 0 Current Contract Completion Date November 19, 2000 Actual Completion Date November 14. 2000 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 95,400 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0 Change Orders to Date $ 0 Final Contract Price $ 95,400 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Section 8, Page 97) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) R.-. bd198 1YrfddlMy OYlpeNa'6vN Aq,+Y RepuY\ lB W• Rep WX1V 1NE).M 1 Budget increases in design and construction staff labor to complete the job closeout are " offset by a decrease in the funds allocated for the construction contract. As a result, the net activity is a budget decrease. Please refer to the Budget Information Table for detailed information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job Number SP2000-20, Extension of Reclaimed Water Line at Plant No. 2, includes the installation of 1,100 feet of six-inch steel reclaimed water pipe along with pipe supports and valves in the Headworks "C", Lindstrom, and Harris tunnels. CGvL Engineers prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. on July 13, 2000. The contract is 100% complete. ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table RwseC-. M19! \YSTbY1My EY\ptl`8 NI.peN�RpwY\]Nt BwN�pxxlRq btlA11Nm1]��6A 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EXTENSION OF RECLAIMED WATER LINE AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. SP 2000-20 t� dHaPda t o PRb i t I i1ND3 TNIS k6kMEb Es Nf T o �4 4 i h�Eha a BbA t o Auredl:lfa�t�W miT%L I Ex b T '�A�"E �'Q'UEST AUT�ibfYIZA'�ON (�� D 6b�r e y ^� r,�84 v Project Development $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1.336 67% Studies/Permitting Consultant PSA $ 24,000 $ 24,000 $ 24.000 "` $ 24.000 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 100% Design Staff $ 1,800 $ 1.800 $ 7,000 $ 8,800 $ 1,800 $ 7,000 $ 8,800 $ 7.036 80% Construction Contract $ 186,000 $ 186,000 $ (90.600) $ 95,400 r $ 95,400 $ 95,400 $ 95,400 100% Construction(other) Construction Staff $ 7,600 $ 7,600 $ 10.000 $ 17,600 ' $ 7,600 $ 10.000 $ 171600 $ 13,298 76% Contingency $ 19,000 $ 19,000 $ 19,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 240.400 $ 240,400 1 $ (73,600) $ 166.800 $ 130,800 $ 17,000 $ 147.800 $ 141,070 95-A Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 240,400 $ 240.400 1 $ (73.600) $ 166.800 $ 130.800 1 S 17.000 1 $ 147.800 $ 141,070 9579/ b:\wp.tlbbig\amell pro)e 32000 p2000-2ftua9el tsWsaWl Form ReWaed Oct.4,2000 PDC COMMITTEE McCin,Da T°e°•°r°" 0 0uot 08r�arot AGENDA REPORT Hern Numbs Ism N°mbv Pornt-oo txet Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Andrei loan, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. to conduct a Value Engineering workshop and prepare a Value Engineering study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $57,759. SUMMARY Approximately four miles of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) are located along the Santa Ana River within the cities of Yorba Linda, Anaheim and in unincorporated areas of Orange and San Bemardino Counties. Based on several engineering studies, Staff has concluded that the pipeline and manholes could potentially fail, due to streambed degradation in an extraordinary flood event. On August 23, 2000, the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) to Brown and Caldwell to prepare the construction documents for the SARI line relocation. The SARI line is a regional collector line and provides service to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its participating agencies. Given the pipeline significance and the current budget estimate of$49,787,000, Staff determined that a Value Engineering (VE) study is required in an attempt to identify possible ways to reduce the cost. SAWPA will be invited to participate in the Value Engineering effort. The Consultant is to gather a team of specialists, conduct a 4-day VE workshop, and prepare a VE study, which will present cost saving options available to the Orange County Sanitation District(District). Five fines were invited to submit proposals for the VE study: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.; Sverdrup Civil, Inc.; Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc.; Black& Veatch Corporation and George Mack Wesner, PhD. Staff received proposals from the following two firms on December 18, 2000: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. and Black&Veatch Corporation. Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals on January 8, 2001. SAWPA participated in the process of reviewing and ranking the proposal through their representative from Webb Engineering. Staff recommends p,,;,,,; � Page 1 approval of a PSA with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for conducting a VE workshop and for preparing a VE study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $57,759. The workshop will be conducted between March 12 and March 15, 2001. The final Value Engineering (VE) study is due by April 12, 2001. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, is $49,787.000. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. The total funds authorized to dale for Professional Services Agreements (PSA) are summarized below: Finn PSA, Including Addenda Holmes & Narver $465,089 Glenn Lukos &Associates $39,845 Carl Nelson $37,200 Simeon, Lassen and Marsh $10,000 Brown &Caldwell $3,807,047 K.S. Dunbar $166,000 TOTAL $4,525,181 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000/01 Budget Section a, Page 6 and 21, Contract No. 2-41) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget detail is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this contract. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Proposal Evaluation Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach, solid understanding of the Scope of Work, detailed permitting plan, ability to meet the Districts' schedule, and similar project experience. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.'s researched the project and demonstrated their understanding expressed in their analyses of the critical project issues and cost considerations. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.'s proposed fee was the lowest. The majority of the Staff ranked Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. proposal the highest. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals for additional information. em. � Page 2 V' ALTERNATIVES The Value Engineering (VE) study may be eliminated from the design process. However, VE efforts have been known to produce significant cost reduction design options. CEQA ACTION The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement(EIR/EIS) was certified on July 19, 2000. A Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2000. The document has been designated as an EIR/EIS. The EIS designation refers to an Environmental Impact Statement that is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)for Federally funded projects. The EIR/EIS is structured to focus on analysis of alternatives consistent with the provisions of NEPA. Since the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority may consider seeking low interest loan funding or grants to pay for some of their share of the project costs, the Federal EIS approval process may be required. That process would be carried out by the Federal lead agency, such as the Environmental Protection Agency. In the interim, the District will continue to work with the necessary Federal agencies involved in permitting and/or funding of this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services Al:jak G:\wp.dta%agendMBoerd Agenda Repodat2001 Board Agenda RepodaY1201vtem 13(e).dw gvy, erm�e Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTiTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPEND€R. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(* Project Development $ 17,000 S 17,000 $ 17.000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 7,896 46% Studies/PermiBing $ 1.122.000 $ 1,122,000 $ 1,122,000 $ 1,122.000 $ 454,503 41% Consultant PSA $ 875,000 $ 4,525,181 $ 57.759 $ 4582.940 $ 4,525,181 $ 57,759 $ 4,582,940 $ 762,841 17% Design Staff $ 366,200 $ 831,000 $ 831,000 $ 831.000 $ 831,000 $ 253.072 30% Construction Contract $ 21,203,400 $ 33.000,000 $ 33.000.000 $ Construction Administration $ 1,262.300 $ 1.876.000 $ 1,876,000 $ Consruo8on Inspection $ 1.718.000 $ 2,555,000 $ 2,555,000 $ Easement Ac uisllion $ 69,000 1 000 Pnlin en $ 5,088,400 $ 5,791,819 $ 57,759 $ 5.734,060 $ OJECT TOTAL $ 30,530,300 $ 49,787,000 1$ - $ 49,787.000 $ 6,495.181 $ 57,759 $ 6,552,940 $ 1,478,312 23% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 30,530,300 1 $ 49,787,000 1 $ - $ 49.787,000 1 $ 6,495,181 $ 57,759 $ 6,552,940 1 $ 1.478,312 23% Wwpx WWngUOBS&WNTR SV41 SARI RE IGNMENT_Budgei into tables-copiesy241 VE Study-Budget Table.xislDiShicls Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 Total Project Budget: $49,787,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: September 4, 2000 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 12/20/00 Original PSA Conduct Value Engineering (VE) $ 57,759 $ 57,759 workshop and prepare VE study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41 N:\wp.dteWngUOBS&CONTRACTSt 41 SARI RE IGNMEI,In Budget info tables-coplesQ41 PSA Status Report VE Study.doc Al:jak r SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION & PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 The following firms received a Request for Proposals sent out on November 22, 2000: • Black & Veatch Corporation • Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. • George Mack Wesner, PhD. • Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. • Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Proposals were received from Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. and Black & Veatch Corporation on December 18, 2000. Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., Sverdrup Civil, Inc., and George Mack Wesner, PhD did not respond. Proposals were distributed for review and ranked by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of seven members. The review panel met on January 8, 2001, and discussed the results of the evaluation. No interviews were conducted. The Consultants were evaluated based upon the proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work. Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performina the Work. Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Proiect Experience. Rates the team's overall total number of year's experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to design of sewers. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design of sewers. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to design of sewers. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team. 6. Proposed Schedule. Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule? u The two consulting firms were then ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the two firms (See Table 1.0): 1. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 1946 Points 2. Black & Veatch Corporation 1927 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked Consultant. Parsons Engineering Science. Inc. (Parsonsl Parsons had the highest-ranked proposal based on meeting the Districts' schedule, project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. Parson's understanding and analyses of the critical Value Engineering study issues the best compared to the other Consultant's proposal. Several good ideas highlighted in Parson's proposal included using a homogenous team of specialists the addition of several topics to the evaluation phase. The Staffs' qualifications presented were good and Parson's staff had the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project teams, including the sub-consultants, were well organized based upon specialties and division of work. Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the two firms. The top ranked consultant, Parson's submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Parson's fee proposal is 6% lower than the fee proposal submitted by Black and Veatch Corporation, the second ranked consultant. Staff recommends Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. be awarded the PSA for the Santa Ana River Interceptor River Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for a total fee not to exceed $57,759. Ai:jak H9wp.dt@%nguOBS&CONTRACTS -41 SARI REALIGNMENTWE STUDYI241 staff mivadon VE.doa TABLE 1.0 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Black & Veatch Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Reviewer A 268 256 Reviewer B 234 247 Reviewer C 284 287 Reviewer D 314 261 Reviewer E 243 263 Reviewer F 262 288 Reviewer G 322 344 Total Score 1,927 1,946 2450 Points Maximum Average Score 275 278 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 371 348 Man-hours 100% Study Completion Proposed --- 4/12/01 Date PDC COMMITTEE "eeUngDr` To BE.ofDir. 2/1/01 2/28/01 AGENDA REPORT HAM NUMW Min Wmba PDCU1-05 13fn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sejal Patel, Engineer SUBJECT: HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-80 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$222,500 for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, for a total project budget of $1,124,500; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, for an amount not to exceed $897,339. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Job No. J-80 were completed in August 2000. This project was designed by Tran Consulting Engineers. Job No. J-80 installs new and replaces the existing HVAC equipment, heaters, exhaust fans, and gas heaters throughout various locations at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. It will also link the control of all higher capacity fans to the existing fire alarm system. The plans and specifications for this project were bid on December 5, 2000. Current Project Budget $902,000 Construction Budget $713,000 Engineer's Estimate $713,000 Low Responsible Bid $897,339 High Bid $1,177,000 Number of Bids 3 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Both, the engineer's estimate and construction budget for Job No. J-80, are $713,000. However, the lowest bid is $897,339. R. � Page 1 Authorization in the amount of$966,739 is being requested for Design staff costs, Construction Contract, and supporting Orange County Sanitation District (District) Construction Management staff costs. See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The current project budget is $902,000. A budget amendment of$222,500 is being requested to set a total revised budget of$1,124,500. The budget increase will allocate $14,400 for District staff, $184,339 for Construction Contract, $5,000 for Construction Inspection, and $18,761 for Contingency (to maintain 10% contingency). Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Originally, this project started out as a Small Project (Job No. SP19990068). It has been converted to a Capital Project (Job No. J-80), because the project scope and budget have expanded significantly. Three items have been added to the scope of this project during the design phase. Also, Staffs estimate of the construction cost was significantly lower than the engineers estimate. Job No. J-80 installs new and replaces existing HVAC equipment, heaters, exhaust fans, and gas heaters. It will also link the control of all higher capacity fans to the existing fire alarm system. This project encompasses a total of fifteen tasks. Fourteen of these tasks require installing new or replacing existing HVAC equipment, heaters, and exhaust fans throughout the District's various building facilities and plant process areas at both plants. Seven of the fourteen tasks are to add air conditioning units to areas where there were no prior units. The other seven tasks are to replace existing HVAC systems that are no longer functional; they are either inadequate for the cooling demand or have reached the end of their useful life. The last task is to link the control of all fans of capacity of 2000 CFM or greater to the existing fire alarm system. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives for installing new or replacing existing HVAC systems. The District has an option of not replacing the existing, worn equipment; and the consequences are inefficiency and high maintenance. Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 2, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary SP:jak:jo G1wp.dta1,agendaXeoerd Agenda Reports\2W1 Board Agenda Reparte1g2 Mere 13(f).dm Rm., am se Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO. J-80 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED. PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPERDEG- BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO OATE(46J Project Development $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2.000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ $ Consultant PSA $ 6.600 $ 25.600 $ 14.400 $ 40.000 $ 25,600 $ 14,400 $ 40,000 $ 39,000 98% Design Staff $ 40.400 $ 40,400 $ 40.400 $ 40,400 $ 40,400 $ 38,300 95% Construction ContmGt $ 565,000 $ 713,000 $ 184.339 $ 897.339 $ 897.339 $ 897,339 0% Constmc8on Administration $ 14.000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22.000 $ 22,000 $ 1,000 5% Constmction Inspection $ 16,000 $ 28.000 $ 5,000 $ 33.000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 0% P nc $ 113,000 $ 71,000 $ 18,761 $ 89,761 $ T TOTAL $ 757,000 $ 902.000 $ 222,500 $ 1.124,500 $ 68,000 $ 966,739 $ 1,034,739 $ 80,300 8% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 757,000 1 $ 902,000 1 $ 222,500 1 $ 1,124,500 11 $ 68,000 $ 966,739 1 $ 1,034.739 1$ 80,300 8% H9wp.41eWNn M-PROJECTS199 SMALL PROJECTSVp990068-Miw.HVACIIBUD ET TABLE-REV 1.xlslDislncts r December 5, 2000 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 0 BID TABULATION HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO. J-80 Engineer's Estimate: $713,000 Construction Contract Budget: $713,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. ADAMS/MALLORY CONSTRUCTION $ 897,339 2. OLSSON CONSTRUCTION $ 1,011,000 3. ARK CONSTRUCTION $ 1,177,000 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend swap to ADAMS/MALLORY CONSTRUCTION in the bid amount of$897,339 as the lowest a be t bid. J David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering VrmdonWat llwp.dgleng\SM-PROJECTS\TASK ORDERS\Task Order00-10 Moc.HVAC\Sp18a809068 BID TABAM ReviseC 05/19198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Founklin Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 Job No. J-80 ADAMSIMALLORY OLSSON CONSTRUCTION ARK CC NSTRUCTION Item Approx.Oly, Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ $ 100.00 $ $ $ $ 200,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ $ 895,739.00 $ $ 1,009,000.00 $ $ 927,000.00 A 1 Lump Sum $ $ 1,500.00 $ $ 2,000.00 $ $ 50,000.00 'Add (+)or Delete(-) $ - e "� 4. °tl��x1;Pd L; $ 1,1T ptioftib ADAMS/MALLORY OLSSON CONSTRUCTION ARK CONSTRUCTION H9wp.dtalen9Vonns0d Doc \SP19990068 Bid Summary 1 of 1 01/02/2001 PDC COMMITTEE N np Dele LOGBd pr. o2/a1ro1 a2/2bA AGENDA REPORT Item Number IO M Number yDMI-07 13(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dennis May, Engineer SUBJECT: INTERIM FACILITY RECORD AND ENGINEERING DATA SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES, JOB NO. J-25-6 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget of$354,815 for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25-6; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance, Job No. J-25-6, for an amount not to exceed $294,815. SUMMARY The Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System Project, Job No. J-25-1, will be completed in February of 2001. A component of this project involves the creation of an electronic Facility Record and Engineering Data System (FRED) for the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Treatment Plants. The District is currently involved in design or construction of 63 projects at the two plants, 38 of which potentially affect the data collected during the project development. Additionally, work performed by Operations and Maintenance (O&M) staff after the data collection period will not be reflected in FRED, because it was not available during project development. Because of the large volume of projects presently in Design and Construction, District staff would not be able to keep the system up to date without outside support. The proposed Professional Services Agreement (PSA) will: (1) Analyze the 38 identified projects and work performed by 0&M staff; (2) Incorporate the appropriate information into FRED; (3) Develop procedures to capture design and maintenance activities to maintain FRED; and (4) Conduct knowledge transfer to Engineering staff to maintain the system on an ongoing basis. Brown and Caldwell is being proposed as a sole source due to their expertise and experience as the subconsultant responsible for development of a substantial portion of the District's FRED. FRED uses state of the art technology and substantial custom programming. Engineering is not aware of another firm that is presently capable of executing the work in a manner consistent with the existing system. Once the 36 ongoing projects have been added to FRED by the Consultant, District staff will perform continuous updates as new projects are completed. 1W.dtlahlYgdhaeenda'eo.id xxxd.Rn =lO .A,.R.wec=01.m UW)dx Raiaea. arzaee Page 1 OCSD . P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 9272MM . (714) 962-2411 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY As indicated in the attached Budget Information Table, authorization for expenditure of$30,000 in Design Staff and $294,815 in Consultant PSA is being requested. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Authorization of a transfer of$354,815 from the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Capital Improvement Reserve Funds is being requested for Contract No. J-25-8. The proposed budget authorization is as follows: Design Staff $ 30,000 Consultant PSA $294,815 Contingency 30,00 $354,815 Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 1990, Job No. J-25 was established to develop a facilities atlas and to conduct power system studies or both for both treatment plants. From the parent project, the following projects were established: J-25-1 Computerized Facilities' Record and Drawing System —This project created the Facility Record and Engineering Data System (FRED). J-25-2 Power Studies for Plant Nos. 1 and 2—This project was split into J-25-3, J-25-4 and J-25-5 J-25-3 Power Source Reliability Evaluation and Corrective Actions — This was an urgent project to rectify problems at Plant No. 2 Central Generation. Completed in 1997. GM9.EbWeMe MAY ReMa1iC01 BwN beMaflepahWNtUlem 1]IGI Gae Rw¢M'. Y Page 2 J-254 Electrical Power System Studies—This project evaluated the plant electrical systems to identify potential problems. This project will make recommendations for fixes and development of electrical system expansion to support new facilities identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan. This project will be completed in November 2001. J-25-5 Electrical Power System Single-Line Diagrams— This project develops"intelligent" electrical system drawings. This project is on-hold. J-25-6 Facility Record and Engineering Data System Maintenance - Proposed Implementation of the Facility Record and Engineering Data System (FRED) as part of Job No. J-25-1 is nearly complete. FRED is a Geographic Information System (GIS) that provides a visual, map-based method for accessing information related to the two District treatment plants. This technology requires ongoing data maintenance and data management support services to remain current and useful. This ongoing support will come from District staff. The proposed Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is to provide interim support for projects that are presently underway, but will not be completed prior to FRED implementation. The tasks under the proposed PSA include: 1. Development of standards and knowledge transfer for $41,274. 2. Software support for$73,704. 3. Data Processing to add Capital Projects and O&M changes to FRED for $179,837. ALTERNATIVES Not approving the Professional Services Agreement (PSA). Because of the large volume of projects presently in design and construction, District staff would not be able to keep the system up to date without outside support. Without this PSA as an interim measure, the Facility Record and Engineering Data System (FRED) may become out-of-date before its usefulness is fully realized. CEOA FINDINGS None Required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report DLM:jak:jo G M'RtlO�WMMa1BWN/yenta ReVU =l RUN/yeMe R^pn'U10 13W)Jx ReNaeJ: RrN93 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FACILITY RECORD AND ENGINEERING DATA SYSTEM MAINTENANCE JOB NO. J-25-6 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDE6 BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(47)' Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ $ Consultant PSA 1 1 $ 294,815 $ 294,815 1 1 S 294,815 $ 294,815 1 0% r aff $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0% on Contract $ $ on tion $ $ on $ $ c $ 30.000 $ 30,000 1 1 1 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ - $ - $ 354,815 $ 354.815 $ - $ 324.815 1 $ 324,815 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ - $ - $ 354.815 $ 354,815 $ - IS 324.815 1 $ 324.815 $ 0% HAxy.Na ,U)BS 6 CONTMCTBLL25411J-2H BU4C Into T01.M.1010W. Professional Services Agreement Status Report INTERIM FACILITY RECORD AND ENGINEERING DATA SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES Total Project Budget: $294,815 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: March 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Interim Facility Record and Engineering Data $294,815 $294,815 PSA System Maintenance Services Hft pAe ngUOBS&CONTRACTS -261PS Status Repor ain[Contr.doc 01/04/01 Revi%d 05/14/9B PDC COMMITTEE rkeOftDx Tum.arur. 7/01r01 7J7B(Ol AGENDA REPORT n""a Wr 10G Wmbe PDODI-08 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS, AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA STREET SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-13 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design engineering services for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, for an additional amount of$54,652 increasing the total amount not to exceed $112,237. SUMMARY With the construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor in 1995, the Airbase Trunk Sewers can now be abandoned. The Airbase Trunk Sewers constructed circa 1940s, can no longer be maintained due to structural deterioration causing odor problems. It is desirable to abandon these lines, but the work has been delayed due to various problems including the inability to coordinate the project with local street work. This amendment will allow the work to proceed by extensively revising the construction documents. The revisions include preparation of separate construction packages for Watson Avenue and California Street work. The addition of the Arlington Drive work will create three construction packages that will allow the Orange County Sanitation District(District)to bid and construct the work at different times in order to limit the impact on recent and planned street improvements. This amendment also provides for extensive additional work in order to make improvements acceptable to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. The original design utilized portions of existing sewers in Watson Avenue and California Street in order to limit construction work. Costa Mesa Sanitary District objected to this design because it would have resulted in parallel sewers within the same street. Costa Mesa Sanitary District desired to have only one sewer per street to maintain. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation providing for additional design engineering services, for an additional amount of$54,652 increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $112,237. c6wdnlapwm Mrowda RaWft rol momno Aroubw It 13pi)eac R—� � Page 1 f r PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Une item: IY 2000-e1, Section e, Page 41: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities,Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal. Sewers, Contract No.6-13.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The funds for the proposed Addendum will be transferred from the budget contingency. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Airbase Trunk Sewers were constructed in the 1940s to serve the airbase that is now the Orange County Fairgrounds and the surrounding area. The Airbase Trunk Sewers have deteriorated and can no longer be economically maintained. The Fairview Drive Trunk Sewer and the Baker-Gisler Interceptor Sewer, constructed in the early 1990s, now serve the area and it is feasible to abandon the Airbase Trunk Sewers. Contract No. 6-13 will abandon the Airbase Trunk Sewers. Design for Contract No. 6-13 began in April 1994 with Boyle Engineering Corporation as the design consultant for this project. The County bankruptcy and street pavement moratoriums imposed by the City of Costa Mesa delayed the completion of the design. Additional design funds are needed to complete the project because of increased administrative costs due to delays, additional requirements by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, the addition of the Arlington Drive sewer work, and updating/repackaging of plans and specifications. The Airbase Trunk Sewers provide local sewage service to neighborhoods north of the fairgrounds, as well as having provided regional service. Therefore, prior to abandoning the Airbase Trunk Sewer, new local sewers will need to be constructed in Watson Avenue and California Street and along Arlington Drive. The local sewers will be transferred to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District upon completion. Prior to accepting the Watson Avenue and California Street sewers, the Costa Mesa Sanitary District is requesting design changes that will be done under this amendment. The Arlington Drive portion of the work originally was to be done under Contract No. 6-12; however, because of difficulties in obtaining an easement from the City of Costa Mesa and timing concerns, it was not done. Currently, the District is in the process of obtaining an alternative easement from Newport-Mesa Unified School G 1ry tllvWpeNe MfteMa Rep WtB rd♦GeMa kep WM1V t1�l,)pac ae.;eM. d2O99 Page 2 District. Now, the Arlington Drive portion of the work is being added to this Contract. A separate construction contract package will be created for Arlington Drive portion of the work so the construction can be coordinated with City of Costa Mesa Street work. The original intent was to construct the College Avenue Force Mains (Contract No. 7-23-1) and the Watson Avenue and California Street Sewer portions of Contract No. 6-13 as a single construction contract. Because of local street improvements and planned expansion of the 1-55 and 1-405 freeways possible effect on College Avenue Pump Station, this has been found to be unworkable. The previous design work prepared a single construction plan package for Watson Avenue Sewer, California Street Sewer, and College Avenue Force Mains (Contract No. 7-23-1). The College Avenue Force Mains work will be delayed until the impacts of planned freeway expansions on the sewer system are known, therefore, it will no longer be included in the same construction package as Contract No. 6-13. California Street and Watson Avenue are being separated into two construction packages in order to time the work with the City of Costa Mesa street projects. These design changes are incorporated in this amendment. Due to the delay in construction, the addition of Arlington Drive Sewer, and the creation of separate construction packages, the budgeted construction costs will probably be exceeded by 40% ($1,260,000 to approximately $2,000,000); however, additional construction funding is not currently being requested. Additional funding will be sought after the design is developed and costs are better known. This funding will be incorporated in the 2001-02 year budget. ALTERNATIVES No altematives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS A Mitigated Negative Declaration for Watson Avenue and California Street was adopted in 1994. CEQAlEIR requirements for Contract No. 6-13 were addressed in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. Additional requirements for Arlington Drive will be evaluated and addressed by the District's consultant, K.P. Lindstrom, Inc prior to construction within Arlington Drive. ATTACHMENTS 1) Budget Information Table 2) Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3) Fee Proposal for Addendum No. 1 LAR:jak G M+.EIaW0��1RwNIyxgc Rga =l& HA0 Rgp =1Vbn1V)he RpheE: erg Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK; WATSON AVE., CALIFORNIA ST., & ARLINGTON DR. SEWERS CONTRACT NO. 6-13 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED iPROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED' PROJECTITASK', AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENd@IS BUDGET BUDGET . INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEI%j Project Development $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 592 30% StudiestPemitting $ 7.000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 0% Consultant PSA $ 94,000 $ 94,000 $ 18.237 $ 112.237 $ 57.585 $ 54.652 $ 112.237 $ 57,585 51% Design Staff $ 84000 $ 84,000 $ 84,000 $ 25,847 $ 25.847 $ 25,847 100% Construction Contract $ 1.260,000 $ 1.260,000 $ 1.260.000 $ 58.724 $ 58,724 $ 58,724 100% Construction Administration $ 185,000 $ 185.00 $ 185,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 159,000 $ 159,000 $ 159,000 $ Contingency $ 385,000 $ 385,000 $ 18,237 $ 366,763 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 2.176,000 $ 2,176,000 $ - $ 2,176,000 $ 151,156 $ 54,652 $ 205,808 $ 142,748 69% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 2,176,000 1 $ 2,176,000 $ - $ 2.176.000 11 $ 151,156 $ 54.652 1 $ 205,808 $ 142,748 89% h.1 p.dteten9VeimatbUd9et table Form Revised Oct.4,2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer, California Street Sewer, and Arlington Drive Sewer Job No. 6-13 Total Project Budget: $2,176,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Date of Project: May 1, 1994 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/9/1994 Original PSA Design of new collector sewers in $57,585 $57,585 Watson Ave. & California St. so sections of the Airbase Trunk Sewer can be abandoned. Pending 1 Revising and updating previously $54,562 $112,237 prepared contract documents to meet local agency standards and adding work on Arlington Drive. HAwp.dtMengUOBS&COWRACTSISAWSA Addendum\PSA SWWs Rpt.doc 12/27/00 Revised 05/14/98 SOWLE isol Quail Street Newport Beach, CA 92660-2726 TEL: (949)476-3300 FAX: (949)721-7142 www.boyleengineering.com David A. Ludwig PE,Director of Engineering September 27,2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Abandonment of Air Base Trunk Sewers and Replacement of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main Contracts Nos.6-13 and 7-23-1 Dear Mr. Ludwin: Implementation of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Fairview Relief Sewer systems allows the District the opportunity to abandon the two Air Base Trunk Sewers that were constructed in the 1940's. Plans for the abandonment north of Gisler Avenue were included with the replacement of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Mains. Plans for abandonment of the portion south of Gisler Avenue were to be included with the construction of the Fairview Relief Sewer,however,this did not take place. The District is now desirous of combining the abandonment of these two remaining portions into a single construction package and separating the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main Replacement to form a new contract document package. We are pleased to submit this proposal for this work, in accordance with your staffs request. A scope of work for these revisions has been forwarded and is attached to this proposal. In addition to the re-arrangement of the contract document packages,the work includes converting the plans to a CAD format consistent with the District's current standards and provides for construction support services. The existing plans and specifications will,of course,be used to the maximum extent possible if forming the new contract document packages. Enclosed is a fee summary with a task cost report itemization reflecting this additional work. We are available to review this with you or provide additional detail at your convenience. Sincerely, Boyle Engineering Corporation �E . Philip E. Stone, PE Richard L. Bardin, PE Project Manager Managing Engineer OC-006-100-001#Adde =UtIcr to band A.doc BO✓LE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Project Budget Abandonment of Air Base Trunks Sewers Orange County Sanitation District Contracts Nos. 6-13 and 7-23-1 Personnel Hours Budget e � � 4 O Task Description e cd ° � � 'o a a a C) o G e z (-- Design Phase 1.1 Canv.rll'IunstoAutuCAD 40 40 S 2,2811 S 2,280 2.1 ScImnav Cmmmct No.6.13 Pluns 2 4 36 11 42 1 S 2,629 E IOU Us ',.". 2.2 Revise Speeifteutiuns m Punn a Separate Contract No.6-13 Package 4 8 6 IRIS 1,46,1 S 50 2.) locminnuw Plan Check Revisions 7 16 49 59 S 3,896 2.4 Revise Pavement Itepoir Details 1 9 4 9 S 667 2.5 13pdute Opinion of Construction Cost for Contract g 6-13 1 12 13 S I,039 2.6 Atmnd Mcclings us Requested (2 meelings) 4 4 S 555 S 50l.I ;'&-pure New Server Ilan for Abun.Of Air 0aae Trunk No.2 (Conlr.g 6• 4 12 2•I 4U S 2,823 S 503.2-3.3 ComPlct-Plans fur Rehab.ofAir Base Trunk No.2(Conlr.8 6.13a) 4 20 32 56 S 3,879 S IOU 3.6 I'repurc Specs.fur Aban.Of Air Bm Trunk No.2(Contract No.6.13a) 4 16 4 24 S 1.961 1 E 1,961 3.7 Prepare Opinion ol'Cunstruetion Cost for Contract No.6.13a I 1 611 7 S 389 1 S 589 3.8 Prmass Pluns'nuu OCSD,City.CMSD&N-M School District&. 4 1 121 4 1 4 24 S 1,889 1 S 400 S 2,289 4.1 Separate Cmerucl No.7-23.1 Plans 2 1 1 8 1 10 S 733 S . 50 S 783 4.2 Prepare SIweilicutionsm form a Separate Contract No.7.23.1 Package 4 1 4 1 4 12 S 1,061 1 S IA61 4.3 Incur arum Plan Check Revisions 1 2 6 9 S 631 1 $ 631 4.4 Weparc Opinion ol'Construction Cost for Contract No.7.23.1 1 6 7 S 589 1 S 589 QC Reviews 8 e S I'll S 100 S 1210 E S Subtotal 48 1 122 1 194 IB 382 E 27.793 S 900 S 28,697 Construction Support - Contracts Nos. 6-13a, 6-13b 8, 6-13c 5.1 Pro,idc Ilidding Period Smiccs 12 6 6 2 26 S 2,539 S 2,339 &21M Pao.1.12 U,W E,, .eaea Cnpona Project Budget Abandonment of Air Bpse Trunks Sewers Orange County Sanitation District Contracts Nos. 6-13 and 7-23-1 Personnel lion Budget L L O O L L N O 0 � Task Description 8 C L W W u 4 p 0. � 5.2 Pre-cunsuuction Meeting 6 6 4 16 S 1,498 S 1,4tl8 5.3 Reel...Suhfnivals 1 4 28 24 56 1 S 3,591 S 100 3.991.1s 5.4 RtWeu,Vendor&Lab Reports 6 6 S 4301 Is 450 5.5 furnish Consuhalion During Consuuc0on 28 24 8 60 $ 6,096 $ 5011S 6,146 5.6 Aueml Meetings As OCSD Request (6 memings) 8 16 4 28 S 2,516 S J50S 2,566 3.7 Prepare ItLvmd Drawings 6 20 26 S 1,590 S S 1,890 5.8 Assisi OCSD with Change Orders 6 12 4 22 S 1,93tl S E 2,038 u o a 64 104 26 J6 240 5 20,528 S S 21,I 112 226 220 64 622 E 48,320 S I' S 49,820 Amaanl5 shown ure wages plus overhead. Personnel Cutegory .A Principal Engineer $13S.70 Associate Enginax $75.00 CAD Operutur $57.00 Word Processor $31.50 W7,00 Page 2 of 2 9oyle E,,nee,m0 Co,po,aiwn PDC COMMITTEE rtw � TO DBE.an.. ozrolrol 02J28J01 AGENDA REPORT Ram mmd nem Numbs PDCO1-09 13N1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve continuing the original defined Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, as recommended by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, and disapprove the Irvine Ranch Water District alternate phasing proposal. SUMMARY Under the present implementation plan for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System), Phase 1 would produce about 60 million gallons per day (mgd) or 71,600 acre-feet per year(afy) of water when the project is placed into service in late 2004. Phase 1 would also provide for 100 mgd of peak flow relief, deferring the need for construction of a new Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) ocean outfall. Phases 2 and 3 of the GWR System would add two increments of about 30 mgd each by 2020 for an ultimate capacity of about 120 mgd (130,000 afy). The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) has presented a proposal for breaking Phase 1 of the GWR System into two phases, Phase 1 a and Phase 1 b. This proposal would delay implementation of the Anaheim Forebay recharge portion of the GWR System until additional grant funding is available, or until a greater need is developed. Under the IRWD phasing proposal, Phase 1 a would produce 31,600 afy or about 30 mgd for barrier injection, and would include facilities to provide for 70 mgd of OCSD peak wet weather discharge. Additional capacity would be considered for implementation under Phase lb at a future date. The IRWD phasing proposal was presented to the OCSD Finance Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee on November 8, 2000. The proposal was reviewed by the Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee on October 30, 2000, on November 13, 2000, and again on January 8, 2001. The proposal was also presented at the Joint Boards Workshop on the GWR System on December 2, 2000. At the January 8, 2001 meeting, the Joint Cooperative Committee recommended that the OCSD and Orange County Water District (OCWD) Boards take action to drop the alternate phasing proposal from further consideration. On March 28, 2001, the OCSD and OCWD Boards of Directors will consider whether to proceed with implementation of Phase 1 of the GWR System (Go/No-Go decision) at a total estimated cost of$356.4 million, with each agency having equal shares of $178.2 million. After secured grants of$57 million are received, the total cost to the two agencies will be $352 million, or$147.5 million each. RM a Page 1 A copy of the January 8, 2001 Joint Ground Water Replenishment System (GWR System) Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal discussing the alternate phasing proposal is attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The recommended action will not authorize any additional project expenditure. The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) CIP Budget for the GWR System is $178.2 million. This represents a 50% share in the estimated project costs for Phase 1, less grants received. Total expenditures to date by OCSD are $3.4 million, representing completion of the planning and project development phases of the project, including 30% design documents. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section e, page 1e4) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The recommended action will not authorize any additional expenditure. The Go/No-Go" decision is scheduled for consideration on March 28, 2001. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the January 8, 2001 Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee meeting. ALTERNATIVES Continue to study the GWR System phasing plan as proposed by Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). Staff believes that due consideration has been given to the proposed phasing alternative, and that additional analysis will not provide any new reasons to proceed with the proposal. CEQA FINDINGS The EIR was certified on March 24, 1999. A Record of Decision was issued on August 14, 2000. ATTACHMENTS January 8, 2001 Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Agenda Item JDH:jak Wwp.dalagenda\BoerE Agenda Repona@001 Board Agenda Reporlak0201 Ulem 13(p.doc Re vmrve Page 2 i r '. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: January 8, 2001 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEOA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ALTERNATE PROPOSAL SUMMARY The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) has presented a proposal for phasing of the GWR System that delays delivery of water to the spreading basins in Anaheim until additional funding or greater need is developed. Staff has reviewed their proposal and met with IRWD staff. IRWD has made a briefing on their proposal to OCSD's Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on November 8, 2000 and to the Joint Boards Workshop on the GWR System on December 2, 2000. Staff believes further study of the IRWD phasing proposal will not show any new reasons to proceed with the phasing. RECOMMENDATION Consider referring to full OCWD/OCSD Boards for review. Provide direction. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS By letter dated October 18, 2000, the OCWD Groundwater Producers forwarded a plan prepared by IRWD for phased development of the GWR System. This proposal broke the project into three phases (1A, 16, 1C). It was reviewed with your Committee on October 30 and again on November 13, 2000. Subsequently, IRWD, after discussions with GWR System staff, changed their proposal to split the project into two phases (1A and 1b). Phase 1A is essentially the same as the earlier proposal: construction of AWT and Barrier Facilities. (Note: IRWD's first Phase to was for 28 mgd (26,640 afy). IRWD's new Phase 1A is for 30 mgd (31,643 afy). Both versions used the same capital cost, $187 million.) Phase 1B builds the pipeline to Anaheim (the earlier Phase 1B extended the pipeline only to mid-basin with Phase 1C extending the pipeline to IRWD Proposal January 8, 2001 Page 2 of 5 Anaheim), including adding necessary AWT and pumping facilities. Following is a brief comparison of the alternatives. COMPARISON OF GWR SYSTEM AND IRWD PROPOSAL After reviewing the latest proposal from IRWD for a phased approach to the Groundwater Replenishment System, it is evident that the proponents of both the full GWR System and the IRWD phased approach agree on the basic drivers for the project: increased water supply, improved water quality, protection of the groundwater basin, and provision for wastewater peak flow relief. Proponents of both approaches agree that additional federal grants, state loans, or agency subsidies would enhance the financial viability of the project. In addition, proponents of both approaches agree on the performance of the technology to produce a safe and reliable water supply. The differences, therefore, are focused on the triggers for implementation. The proponents for the full GWR System believe that the immediate implementation of the full project is warranted to assure that the needs of Orange County are addressed in a timely and complete manner, with a locally controlled solution. They believe that while pursuit of additional funding is warranted (and ongoing), the full system is cost effective and the drivers for the project outweigh the potential financial benefits of waiting for confirmation of additional funding sources. And, in fact, the proponents for the full GWR System believe that the risks of delay are significant (loss of opportunity for construction. increased water quality degradation, potential failure of Metropolitan Water District (MWD) to meet all of the water quality and supply needs, increased costs and/or unforeseen and adverse new permit and construction conditions). The proponents of the IRWD approach believe that the needs of Orange County can be addressed by continued dependence on MWD supplies until such time as additional funds are available from MWD subsidies and/or federal grants. MWD has previously denied funding for the GWR System. They believe that MWD has historically provided reliable supplemental water and see no urgency for a locally provided water supply. They also believe that through delaying of implementation of the full project, a more favorable funding environment will be created. The following "Need Analysis Table" summarizes the two proposed approaches for meeting the water supply and wastewater management needs of Orange County. r IRWD Proposal January 8, 2001 Page 3 of 5 NEED ANALYSIS TABLE Orange GWR System IRWD Phased County Need Approach Approach Pros/Cons of Each Approach Meet future Provides more Provides The GWR System provides reliable, 100% water demands than 70,000 afy approximately available supply regardless of MWO water for Orange at about 31,643 aty at about availability. County $420/af $4251af (See Note 1) (Phase 1) (Phase 1A) The IRWD approach provides MWD (See Note 1). replenishment water 50%of the time at $2601af, replenishment water 20% of the Remainder of time at$379/af,and no replenishment water supplies would be 30%of the time. through MWO— purchase of (Note 1) IRWD states a project yield of replenishment 31,643 afy. With a limited RO capacity of (surplus)water. 30 mgd, the IRWD approach can only meet a portion of the barrier summer peak demand of 42 mgd and all of the winter demand of 15 mgd. However,with these limitations, staff believes the actual yield is less than 31,643 afy, probably about 25,000 afy- Protect/improve Provides Provides about The GWR System provides full barrier groundwater 36,000 afy for 31,643 aty for protection, as well as substantial basin quality Banner(meets Bar ier. improvements to water quality in the Upper all barrier (Sae Note t). Basin. needs) MWO water would The IRWD approach does not satisfy all of Provides be purchased for the barrier demands for protection from 34,000 sty for remainder of Barrier seawater intrusion. The supply water from Upper Basin needs. MWD does not provide comparable water quality groundwater basin quality improvements improvements. MWD Diemer (significant salinity reduction) as those Bypass water for provided by the GWR System. quality improvement, limited quantity. Provide Provides new Provides a reduced The GWR System reduces dependence on diversity of source of water new source of water imported water and provides Orange County water sources far Orange for Orange County - with a more diverse water supply. County greater 31.643 afy. than 70,000 afy IRWD proposal reduces dependence on imported water, but maintains high level of dependence on MWD for barrier protection and replenishment supply. IRWD Proposal January 8, 2001 Page 4 of 5 NEED ANALYSIS TABLE Orange GWR System IRWD Phased County Need Approach Approach Pros/Cons of Each Approach Provide a During peak Dunng peak flow Both approaches provide adequate mechanism for flow events, events, can provide treatment(MF/UV)for discharge to the river. peak flow relief can provide reduced peak flow 100 mgd of relief. IRWD Phase to comes close to, but does peak flow relief. not provide 100 mgd of peak flow relief. About 1.8 times per Less than one year to river. Under the IRWD phased approach, much of time per year to the treatment(MFIUV)facilities would be over idle most of the time. Capital Cost $352 Million $187 Million Under the IRWD approach,costs will in fact (Phase 1A) be higher than under the full development $165 Million approach. (Phase 1B). Unit Cost $420/aft $425/aft (With grants (Phase 1A) and OCSD) Unit Cost $600/aft $8501aft i^ (Without grants (Phase 1A) and OCSD) Grants $57 Million $57 Million IRWD recommends waiting on Phase 18 (Phase 1A) until new grants are assured. Assume more funding will be received from MWD subsidy($50/af)and future grants. Cost Certainty Fixes the cost Future costs of GWR uncertain. Additional System water. charges for - construction of GWR Pipeline will be incurred if the project is delayed. Drought Provides Future availability of Reliability certainty. MWD replenishment (surplus)water is not certain. Construct GWR Permits and WII tlelay pipeline. Delay of pipeline will raise cost in future,at Pipeline right-of-way are least$5-6 million due to need to replace ready, cost landscaping Corps of Engineers will soon known. install. New encroachments, such as sheriff facility and possible freeway, may also raise costs. IRWD Proposal January 8, 2001 Page 5 of 5 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS October 30, 2000 November 13, 2000 Joint Board Workshop on December 2, 2000 I:WowmenM&PInVe1DWRSIAgenda SOM Mals12001 W1-08 XC18.IRWD Pmposal.Coo v DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 14, 2001 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Shirley McCracken, Chair Shawn Boyd Mark Leyes, Vice Chair John M. Guliixson STAFF PRESENT: Roy Moore Joy L. Neugebauer Blake Anderson, General Manager Jerry Sigler Gary Streed, Director of Finance James W. Silva David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations 8 Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Maintenance Patrick Miles, Director of Information OTHERS PRESENT: Technology Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Director Peer A. Swan Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Don Hughes Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Joe Fournier, PIMCO Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst Christine Telish, PIMCO Mike White, Controller Ryal Wheeler Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Bob Geggie Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the December 13, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Director Jerry Sigler abstained. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 February 14,2001 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair, Shirley McCracken, welcomed new members to the committee meeting. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager, Blake Anderson, reported that the final draft financial study adopted by the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System had been mailed to all directors. All directors were welcome to attend the Joint Cooperative Committee's meetings to be held at the Orange County Water District on February 22 at 5:30 p.m., March 1 at 3:00 p.m., and March 19 at 5:30 p.m. There is a Saturday workshop set for March 3 at 8:00 a.m. to be held at the Orange County Water District. The District's board meeting on March 28 would be a joint meeting with the Orange County Water District to take action on the go/no go decision for the project Mr. Anderson briefly reported on the Huntington Beach Shoreline Monitoring Program, which is requesting a budget of$1.5 million to provide for studies to assist in determining if the District's plume from the ocean ouffall has anything to do with bacteria levels at the shoreline in Huntington Beach. Mr. Anderson, Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, and District engineering staff met with city of Yorba Linda staff to discuss areas of concern to the city and their residents regarding the impacts of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) relocation project. A rigorous community outreach plan is being implemented to apprise all citizens in the area the impact of this project. Approximately 60 different easements will need to be obtained from property owners within the city. The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA), who owns 76% of the SARI line, has not yet found a source for funds or agreed to pay for their share of the cost. The original construction only estimate of$29 million has been updated to an estimate of$54 million for construction only. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance reported on the Treasurer's Report that was given to the Directors at the meeting. For the benefit of new Directors, he explained the process of obtaining the needed information to prepare the report and the conflict of receiving this information when the committee package must be mailed. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources, Lisa Tomko, reported the leadership training program was underway and is being conducted in conjunction with Chapman University. The goals of this program are increased communication, coaching and teamwork within the management staff. Ms. Tomko also reported on SB739, which went into effect on January 1, 2001, and how it will impact the District and its employees. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 February 14,2001 (9) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, reported that the Ocean Outfall Group will be meeting with District staff for the third time on February 21. District staff is hosting this group for two hours every two weeks to cover a variety of issues. Ms. Lawson also spoke about various public outreach opportunities coming up to include the Orange County Fair, community cleanup events and water awareness month events. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. FAHR01-01: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2001. b. FAHR01-02: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR01-03: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of January 25, 2001. d. FAHR01-04: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 2000. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a) through (d) under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR01-05: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, Mike White, Controller, and Joe Fournier of PIMCO discussed the investment program. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHROI-06: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the Five-Year Staffing and Business Plan, fiscal year 20OD-01 to 20D4-05. Blake Anderson reviewed the five-year staffing program and the need to increase staff by 4% during the next fiscal year. The program had previously been reviewed and approved by the OMTS and PDC committees. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 February 14,2001 Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR01-07: Compensation and Classification Study Update Jan Collins reported that the project had been rebid. Staff received seven bids to evaluate, and the contract has been awarded to Johnson 8 Associates, who should begin the project by the beginning of March 2001. (14) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for March 14, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:42 p.m. Submitted by: /1 L/ " ..(�vvca A. Penny W Kyle 61 FAHR Committee Secretary G:Wp ESMptls'F4N1'NNRdM112]OI MinuYYOSIMI FNOtYW 6x Ong Da BOARD OF DIRECTORS nete To m.cra.. • oy1Mo1 o1l]aloI AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbv rem Number F1HR%-01 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2001 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2001. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line ftem: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) a'.'my.CbYWiMe MepM Rgr =l euN•ems RepxbW It te(c).px RwiW: eaosa Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month and may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. On January 26, the sum of $8 million was received from the Orange County Tax Collectors property tax apportionment schedule, and was deposited into the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts January 31,2001 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $24.743.079 6.4 Union Bank Checking Account 441,990 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3,045,000 5.4 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 34,295,501 6.1 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 371,578,378 5.3 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,733 5.8 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees 35,541,945 6.2 Petry Cash 8,000 N/A TOTAL $489.855.828 ALTERNATIVES None. CEOA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC G N.y.�mA RepnhVW18-M Ae RaepY=naW 14(c)&x R.r &cove Page 2 Monthly Treasurer's Report District Fund Balances ' " ' " ' IIIIIIIIII nuioill� IMENS NO 11.0 jrfiH .... •:•,:•,; iii'ii iiiii iiiii •iiiii •,i:•;•; ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .. � , � � � � � � :•;.•:•;• •:•,,:•; •iiiii :❖:;•:� iiiii' iiiii A 1 � MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (or the mouth ended 31 January 2001) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $34,720,303 • Mellon $34,637,970 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $34,544,499 • Mellon $34,561,113 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.25 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( aintloss)of 1%Change: $86,801 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 68% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averse Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.68 0.52 3 Months: 1.91 1.57 12 Months: 7.03 6.05 Year-to-Date: 0.68 0.52 Commentary Jmemn rates at Ne shon<nd of the yield curve declined in January(three-month T-Bills down 90 sub pains to 4.99Y.),while the long<nd posted increases(30-year Traawrles up 4 buis point to 5.50%). The Liquid portfolio outperfo rued it benchmark by 16 bait point In January. PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercbl paper and shoe-tens notes enhanced mluma. a:i.p6apMura.MxlTnawryagm�Vlgae°°./°i NPT.dae MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANA GEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 31 January 2000) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.I PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $375,649,052 • Mellon $376,540,472 Historical Cost: PIMCO $366,579,258 • Mellon $369,911,812 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.13 Of Index: 2.24 15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gainfloss)of 1%Change: $8,001,325 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 27% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avers a Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 1.15 1.45 3 Months: 3.68 4.10 12 Months: 10.66 10.70 Year-to-Date: 1.15 1.45 Commentary • Three-month yields decreased in January(90-day T-Bills dawn 90 bais points to 4.99%)ss did longer maturities(5-year Tmmury Notes down 21 basis points to 4.77'/a). • The lung-Term portfolio legged the benchmark by 30 basis point in January. • PINICO's near-index duration was neutral for pantormimes. • A broader-Nan-index memtity mix had a negative impect on performance as exposure to long maturity holdings detracted from returns. • An underweight allomtlon to intermediate Treasuries in favor of longer maturity Transmits dammed from mmms w intermediate issues outperformed. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities were msm al for performance as this sector performed m-line with the broader market. G:iwdmwnlll°IWnI n�uvrya6m�a-rwppJw/.arnm. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE' 1 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-JAN-2001 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS PAYABLES 447,566.53 -447,566.53 -1.29% 0.00 TOTAL 447,566.53 -447,566.53 -1.29% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 5,026,929.20 5,026,929.20 14.51% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN IYR 5,244,067.51 5,244,067.51 15.14% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 3,628,448.28 5,623,449.28 16.25% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,434,596.86 6,434,5%.86 18.58% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 69,539.33 69,539.33 0.20% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,403,581.18 22,403,581.18 64.68% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 4. S 21,956,014.65 63.39% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 1,861,812.56 1,872,409.45 5.41% 10,596.89 BANKING&FINANCE 8,706,158.70 8,759,250.43 25.29°0 53,091.75 INDUSTRIAL 202,730.00 203,332.00 0.59% 602.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,845.00 500,340.00 1.44% 4,495.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 996,082.20 1,004,154.30 2.90% 8,072.10 TOTAL UNITED STATES 12,262,628.46 12,339,496.20 35.62% 76,857.74 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES I£,f6f.3 -9 12;339,486.N 35.62% 76,857.74 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 342,469.40 342,469.40 0.99% 0.00 TOTAL 342,469.40 342,469A0 0,99% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS ld� 342,469.40 — 0&6 13-Feb-2001 10:37:15 &ccWim Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE. 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31JAN-2001 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 34,561,112.51 34,637,970.25 100.00% 76,857.74 13-Feb-2001 10:37:15 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 1 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-JAN-2001 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 9,244.65 9,244.65 0.00% 0.00 PAYABLES 33,168,546.89 -33.168,346.89 .8.81% 0.00 TOTAL -33,159,302.23 -33,159,302.23 -8.81% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 39,179,981.04 39,178,981.04 10.40% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,643,305.27 1,643,305.27 0.44% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 40,822,286.31 40,822,286.31 10.84% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS , yB1 4 �7,6 2,,9ET.b$ -----------lAm 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 14,511,562.50 15,158,385.00 4.03% 646,822.50 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 33,290,294.35 34,281,574.67 9.10% 991,280.32 U.S.AGENCIES 132,181,392.04 136,241,122.16 36.18% 4,059,730.12 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 36,037,221.85 36,323,665.99 9.65% 286,444.14 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 13,570,177.80 13,740,004.49 3.65% 169,826.69 FHLMC POOLS 7,552,129.85 7,494,329.66 1.99% -57,800.19 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,710,526.08 4,629,846.21 1.23% .80,679.87 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 3,573.98 3,575.10 0.00% 1.12 ABS:HOME EQUITY 101,934.12 100,946.38 0.03% -987.74 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 1,000,110.00 0.27% 110.00 BANKING&FINANCE 74,638,490.61 74,901,167.93 19.89% 262,677.32 INDUSTRIAL 10,404,091.00 10,415,999.00 2.77% 11,908.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 11,134,330.00 11,131,730.00 2.96% -2,600.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,307,957.00 1.94% 7,957.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,235.00 7,519,425.00 2.00% 22,170.00 G.0.CTCY/MUNI 1,723,290.00 1,971,740.00 0.50% 148,460.00 HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,793,815.15 0.48% 163,341.10 TOTAL UNITED STATES 357,296,733.23 363,915,393.74 96.65% 6,629,660.51 13-Fe&2001 10:39.06 Emullm Workbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE 2 EASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-JAN-2001 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 357,236,733.23 363,915,393.74 96.65% ,660.51 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,962,094.35 4,962,094.35 1.32% 0.00 TOTAL 4,962,094.35 4,962,094.35 1,32% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS � 4.962, 94i 4 S 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 30,911,911.66 376,540,472.15 100.00% 6,628,660.51 13-Feb-2001 10,39.06 EYecutiW Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSFD75111U2 2001/D1/31 RUN DATE 02/06/01 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT NODDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 69,539.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HURT .000 5.304 AAA IDD.DDO 69,539.33 .31 996085247 AAA 69,539.33 .20 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.452 .000 P-1 97.953 881,577.00 3.93 36959HT64 06106/2001 881,577.00 2.54 900,DO0.00 CARPSELL SOUP CO DISC 5.510 .000 P-1 98.731 888,576.00 3.96 13443ARG2 04/16/2001 888,576.00 2.56 BDO,DDO.DO SECTOR DICKINSON DISC 5.513 .000 P-1 98.865 090,916.67 3.53 D758SM90 04/09/2001 790,916.67 2.28 100,D00.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 5.526 .000 P-1 98.622 98,622.36 .44 07588RRR8 04/25/2001 98,622.36 .28 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL, NAIL NTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.571 .000 P-1 98.717 2,961,500.00 13.21 313509DRI MAT 03/29/2001 A-1♦ 2,961,500.00 0.52 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTG CORP DISC 5.610 .000 P-1 99.936 3,363,832.50 15.01 31339IDB4 HAT 03/15/2001 A-I+ 3,363,832.50 9.68 200,0OD.00 2RDENA1 NAIL HTG ASSN D28COUNT 5.619 .000 P-1 99.149 694,043.19 3.09 313589DB6 HAT 03/15/2001 A-I+ 694,043.19 2.00 600,000.00 NERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 5.626 .DOD P-1 99.010 594,058.67 2.65 59018JQP2 03/23/2001 594,058.67 1.71 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.I73 .DOD P-1 99.252 2,119,053.67 12.40 313589CC5 NAT 02/20/2001 A-I+ 2,779,053.67 8.00 5,400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 6.290 .DOD P-1 97.112 5,244,067.51 23.40 912195GC9 04/19/2001 DD 10/19/00 A-1+ 5,244,067.51 15.09 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN NTG CORP DISC 6.541 .000 P-1 98.462 2,264,615.78 10.10 313391BH3 NAY 02/01/2001 A-1+ 2,264,615.78 6.52 900,DOD.00 BANK ONE CORP DISC 6.552 .000 98.600 887,403.00 3.96 0642AOPU5 02/28/2001 887,403.00 2.55 900,000.00 HOTOROLA INC DISC 6.645 .000 P-1 96.419 885,I35.50 3.95 62008APP6 02/23/2001 885,775.50 2.55 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE S 2 OCSF07511102 2DO1/01/31 RUN DATE S 02/06/01 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 1D.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOUR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ _________- ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.021 .038 22,403,581.18 100.00 22,403.581.19 64.48 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 200,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BK CONS BDS 5.395 5.492 AAA 100.141 200,106.00 1.62 3133MSBC3 5.500% 08/13/20DI DD 08/13/98 AAA 200,202.00 .50 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 600642 5.549 5.248 A2 100.042 438,583.20 3.56 17120QJ36 5.250% 10/22/2001 DD 10/22/98 A 440.184.80 1.27 400,000.00 FEDERAL NON¢ LN BE CONS BDS S.756 4.976 RAN 99.989 397,312.00 3.24 3133M6R67 4.905% 11/23/2001 DD 11/23/98 AAA 399,956.00 1.15 $20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BDS 5.885 5.502 AAA 100.141 018,442.00 6.65 3133M5DS6 5.580% 08/17/2001 DD 08/27/98 AAA 921,156.20 2.36 75,000.00 FEDERAL KOME LN BE CONS BDS 5.973 6.453 AAA 100.734 75,271.50 .61 3333MCAS8 6.500% 09/28/2001 DD 09/20/00 AAA 75,550.50 .22 500,000.00 GMAC MIN 000398 6.220 5.990 A2 100.054 498,260.00 4.05 37042WRT0 5.800% 04/09/2001 DD 04/00/98 A 500,270.00 1.44 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN ITR 00016 6.568 6.565 Al 101.140 500,268.50 4.09 44922YAR9 6.640% 10/29/2001 DD 10/29/99 Ai 505,700.00 1.46 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBB 6.576 6.402 AAA 100.594 99'892.00 .91 3134A05P3 6.440% 00/21/2001 DD O9/21/96 AAA 100,594.00 .29 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORD MTN 6.830 6.938 Al 100.090 700.307.00 5.72 00206HL44 0.000% 08/15/2001 DD O9/20/99 Ai 706,230.00 2.03 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 6.844 8.821 A2 102.033 448,219.20 3.63 34537OAY6 9.000% 09/15/2001 DD 09/15/91 A 448,945.20 1.29 1,002,000.00 WORLUCOM INC SR HIS 6.045 6.112 A3 100.215 996,082.20 8.13 90155RAF9 6.1258 08/15/2001 DD 08/11/99 A- 1,004,154.30 2.89 175,000.00 CIT GROUP BLDGS MTN 1 SR 00010 6.862 5.625 Al 100.000 173,383.00 1.41 125600AK5 5.6258 02/02/2001 DD 02/02/96 A 175,000.00 .50 1,ODO,000.00 TRAMSAIURICA FIN CORD NTS 6.863 6.335 A3 100.638 995,534.00 8.15 893502BS2 6.335% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/96 A- 1,006,380.00 2.90 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 OCBF07511102 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/02 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIMB t 10.54.10 mvvvvvvvvvvvvmvmmmvvvvvvvvvmvvvvvvammvvvvvvvvmcvmmmmmmvvvvvvvmmmmmmmumvvvvmvvmmmmmmmmmvmmmmmmvvmmmmmmmmmvvmvmmmmmvmvvvvv---- PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MAPLES TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE ERNEST VALUE 0 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN In 00006 6.899 6.166 A3 100.060 495,845.00 4.05 90269QAF6 6.170% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/98 A- 500,340.00 1.44 200,000.00 HEELER FINANCIAL INC NT6 6.943 5.737 A3 100.224 197,732.00 1.62 423330WO 5.750% D9/25/2001 DD D025/98 A- 200,440.00 .58 200,000.00 BURLINGTON HIS INC NT 6.960 8.361 A3 101.666 202,730.00 1.64 122014AD5 9.500E 10/01/2001 DD 10/17/91 A- 203,332.00 .59 250,000.00 CMASE MANHATTAN CORP NEW SUB 6.984 9.241 Al 101.453 254,730.00 2.05 16161ABLI 9.395E 07/01/2001 DD 07/01/89 A+ 253,632.50 .33 275,000.00 FEDERAL SONY LN BK CONS EDE I.059 5.142 AAA 99.953 270,789.06 2.22 3133N6EA2 5.140% 05/02/2001 DO 11/02/98 AAA 274,87D.)5 .79 500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORP MTN 400081 7.316 6.714 A3 100.529 496,495.00 4.07 066009DJ4 6.I501 08/09/2001 DD 08/09/96 BBB+ 502,645.00 1.45 1,000,000.00 ARISTAR INC SR NT 7.346 7.696 A3 100.703 1,003,830.00 8.16 040420ATS 0.050E 06/15/2001 DD O7/07/94 A- 1,OO7,030.00 2.90 1,000,000.00 PLEET/NORSTAR FINL GROUP INC 9.365 9.757 A3 101.469 1,024,020.00 8.22 339019AD5 9.900% 06/15/2001 DO 06/24/91 A- 1,014,690.00 2.92 575,000.00 FCC NATL BK DE MTN 4 TR 00204 7.426 6.369 AA2 100.093 570,262.00 4.66 3024INMV4 6.305E 03/15/20DI DD 03/14/96 A+ 575,534.75 1.66 420,000.00 BANKAMERICA CORP SR NT 0.441 6.631 AA2 100.281 417,034.80 3.41 066050CJ2 6.650E OS/01/2001 DO 05/01/96 A+ 421,100.20 1.21 1.000,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN 6 JEN TROOUII 0.530 6.102 Al 100.138 907,060.00 8.11 25066CA1,8 6.110% 05/15/2001 DD 05/27/90 A- 1,001,390.00 2.08 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6.509 6.350 12,262,620.46 100.00 12,339,406.20 35.53 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 6.113 3.180 34,666,209.64 100.00 34,743,067.38 100.00 vvvvvvvvvvvvvevv. vvvevmmmv YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4 OCSF00522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/01 DISTRICTi LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.54.10 .............................. ---------------...........____................==.==.......................................... PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD a-P PRICE MARXEY VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,643,305.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOST .000 5.384 AAA 100.000 1,643,305.27 4.02 996095247 AAA 1,143,305.27 .41 7,260,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.301 .000 P-1 98.313 7,145,413.07 17.50 63743CS07 05/24/2001 7,145,413.07 1.37 600,000.00 CANPBELL SOUP CO DISC 5.428 .000 P-1 98.194 589,162.33 1.44 13443ASK4 05/31/2001 569,162.33 .15 4,900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.484 .000 P-1 99.379 4,869,505.97 11.92 63743CQD0 03/13/2001 4,069,585.97 1.20 4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.682 .000 P-1 98.600 4,535,531.67 11.11 36959HMO 04/25/2001 4,535,500.67 1.12 3,300,000.00 ANERICAN EA CA CP DISC 6.301 .000 P-1 90.567 1,675,643.72 4.10 02501ROMB 03/21/2002 2,675,643.72 .41 10,600,000.00 NOTOROLR INC DISC 6.403 .000 P-1 90.120 10,380,306.17 25.42 62000AR60 04/06/2001 10,300,306.17 2.56 1,2D0,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.443 .000 P-1 90.397 1,100,768.67 2.69 36959HQM2 03/21/2001 1,180,768.67 .29 8,400,000.00 GOLDMAN SACKS LP DISC 6.511 .000 P-1 98.909 8,309,337.33 20.35 30142TPC3 02/12/2001 8,308,337.33 2.05 500,000.00 DO PONT DE NENOUR DISC 6.516 .000 P-1 98.037 494,196.21 1.21 26354AP99 02/09/2001 494,196.11 .12 ________ _______ ----------------- ________- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.366 .400 40,822,206.31 100.00 40,922,266.31 10.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC GLOBAL NT .000 6.754 A2 100.107 899,721.00 .24 003902WO FLTG AT 08/01/2002 DO 07/29/99 A 101,683.00 .22 3,000,000.00 DAINLER CHRYSLER NA CORP NT .000 7.339 A2 100.156 3,000,000.00 .92 233835AM9 PLTG AT 12/16/2002 DO 12/15/00 A 3,004,680.00 .74 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 20Dl/01/31 RUN DATE 02/06/01 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ -----_-_-_ 269,657.75 FHLMC GROUP 178-6064 .000 6.336 AAA 1DO.547 263,084.96 .03 313488M53 6.384% 01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA 2)1o132.)0 .07 1,205,929.44 GNMA II POOL 00080395 .000 6.448 AAA 100.913 1,195,000.70 .33 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DO O4101100 AAA 1,215,733.65 .30 9.320,625.56 GNMA II POOL 000040OX .000 6.448 AAA 100.813 9,621,900.46 2.69 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 9.799,654.25 2.42 8,913,815.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.715 3.590 AM 100.969 8,078,978.19 2.47 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2D02 OD 07/15/97 AAA 9,000,189.87 2.22 25,273,550.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX EFT 3.817 3.374 AAA 100.031 24,411,316.16 6.94 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2D0) DO 01/15/97 AAA 25,201,384.90 6.25 1,899,030.30 SALOMON SMITH BARNRY SLUGS IMF 4.302 3.656 AA 99.830 1,063,978.41 .52 79549BOGI 3.650% 02/14/2002 DD 02/14/97 A 1,095,809.93 .43 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HIM 5.261 6.452 A3 ID1.359 1,438,920.00 .39 81240QGN6 6.54D4 02/20/2003 OD 02/20/97 A- 1,419,026.00 .35 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.548 5.804 AAA 103.687 2,179,375.00 .59 912810E07 06.250E 08/15/2023 DO 00/15/93 AAA 2,153.340.00 .53 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES COUP N A BR NTS 5.650 4.421 AA3 101.230 1.543t215.00 .41 D46D03HY8 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 AA- 1,518t450.00 .30 3,950,000.00 GMAC STE 5.752 6.957 A2 98.583 3,918,768.50 1.OI 3I0425QV5 FLTG RT O8/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 A 3,994,028.50 .96 1,000,000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.360 5.737 A3 1DO.224 999,730.00 .27 42333HKJ0 5.350% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 1,002,240.00 .25 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MEN SR 000570 5.775 6.9D3 A2 100.D89 9991188.90 .23 44181KKT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/90 A 1,000,890.DO .IS 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROBBUCR ACCEP COUP MTN 5.849 6.526 A3 101.593 3,073,170.00 .83 8124003A1 6.630E O7/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 3,047,790.00 .75 2.000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL HT 5.881 6.849 Al 99.555 1,992,000.00 .54 066365DM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 1,991,100.00 .49 21,611.25 FHLHC MULTICL RIG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.913 99.701 21,590.96 .00 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 21,563.92 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 MSF07522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE 1 02/06/01 DISTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 1 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE A TOTAL 1,945,000.00 NEW .JERSEY HLTN CARE SER B 5.942 5.150 AAA 92.227 1,630,474.05 .49 64579ERMO 4.750% 07/01/2028 OD 12/01/98 AAA 1,793,815.15 .44 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DENS 5.967 6.692 AAA 106.469 16,154,410.00 4.53 31359MFUI 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02:/14/00 AAA 16,502,695.00 4.08 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL MATL MTG ASSN MTN 5.991 5.808 AAA 100.203 14,955,300.00 4.12 31364G2VO 5.820% 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 15,030,450.00 3.71 2,500,00B.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.331 AA3 100.694 2,526,725.00 .69 590163KP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,517,350.00 .62 2,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA INC SER B 6.001 5.343 ARA 93.587 1,723,280.00 .51 613041GH9 5.000% 11/15/2029 DP 22/01/90 AAA 1,871,740.00 .46 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.01D 5.985 RAY 100.259 7,497,255.00 2.06 079867AE5 6.000% 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/18 AAA 7,519,425.00 1.86 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.015 6.663 A2 101.312 3,039,25D.00 .93 059165DN7 6.750% 12/15/2002 DO 12/2D/0D A 3,039,360.00 .75 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOM IN KID CORP DENS 6.062 6.000 AAA 100.000 12,485,625.00 3.43 3134A3EM1 6.000% 07/20/2001 OD 07/20/99 AAA 12,500,000.00 3.09 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 6.109 6.506 AAA 99.906 14,458,125.00 3.90 01HO62623 6.500% 02/15/2031 AAR 14,486,370.00 3.58 2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 6.133 6.089 A2 100.605 1,999,600.00 .55 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 2,012,100.00 .50 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.392 AAA 136.091 12,332,197.50 3.57 912810EG9 08.750% 08/15/2020 DO 08/15/90 AAA 13,004,645.00 3.21 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 4TRO0615 6.154 6.083 A2 99.468 1,499,415.OD .40 17120QEBO FLTG RT 09/08/2002 DO 04/0B/98 At 1,492,020.00 .37 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MIN 4TR 00311 6.180 6.873 AA3 100.156 1,699,517.20 .46 61745EMY3 FLTG RT 01/28/2002 DO 01/27/00 AA- 1,702,652.00 .42 3,573.99 FIFTH THIRD BA AUTO TA 96A CLA 6.200 6.190 AAA 100.031 3,573.98 .00 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 3,575.10 .00 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 4TR 00004 6.201 6.199 A3 100.011 1,000,000.00 .27 73317PAD1 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB+ 1,000,110.00 .25 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE Y OCSF07522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t D2/D6/D1 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT HOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD a-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO TERM ENRANCED 6.221 6.212 A2 99.960 1,998,613.60 .54 345397SCO FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,360.00 .49 3,000,ODO.DO CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DENS 6.271 6.126 Al 100.079 2,994,300.00 .82 209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20197 At 3,002,370.00 .34 101,934.12 GREEN TREE CORP 99-0 CL A-1 6.290 6.352 AAA 99.031 101,934.12 .02 3935052Y7 6.290E 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 100,946.38 .02 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG AMEN MTN 6.291 6.154 AAA IDI.234 4,488,0D5.00 1.25 31364CWS 6.230E 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,555,530.00 1.13 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN ITR 00246 6.300 6.327 A3 99.538 3,000,000.00 .02 42333HLF3 FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,980,340.00 .34 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MEN ACCEP ITR 00562 6.303 6.276 A2 99.310 3,793,959.00 1.04 37042HEKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3,769,294.00 .94 2,685,120.60 FELMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 7.041 AAA 96.649 2,608,057.22 .I1 3133ME95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 AAA 2,595,142.29 .64 2,334,382.47 GNNA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 6.287 AAA 100.529 2,334,382.47 .64 3837N4NK9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,346,731.35 .58 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.668 A2 101.232 2,031,960.00 .55 073902AHI 6.050% D4115/2003 A 2,024,640.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 I.003 A2 99.500 3,000,000.00 .02 345397SRS FLTG RT 03/27/2003 DD 03/16/00 A 2,985,000.00 .74 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 6.900 A2 99.671 1,992,580.00 .54 345393RV2 FLTG AT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/95 NR 1,993,420.00 .49 24,669.05 GNHA POOL #0500917 6.389 6.109 AAA 98.218 23,415.30 .00 36210SPAO 6.000E 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 24,228.47 .01 74,707.67 GNHA POOL 10506636 6.309 6.109 AAA 99.219 70,913.92 .02 36210YY90 6.000E 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 73,376.38 .D2 923,049.05 GNNA POOL 40503398 6.399 6.109 AAA 98.218 826,1]5.4] .24 36210VF55 6.000E 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 906,600.32 .22 26,398.20 GNNA POOL /0499153 6.369 6.109 AAA 98.218 25,057.74 .00 3621000E5 6.000E 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/91 AAA 25,927.06 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSFO7522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE 02/06/01 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD E-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 0 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 22,725.52 GNMA POOL #0496284 6.390 6.109 AAA 90.219 21,571.49 .00 36210M051 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 22,320.78 .01 899,079.84 GNHA POOL #0496461 6.390 6.109 AAA 98.219 853,423.44 .24 36210MON4 6.000E O1/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 883,061.23 .21 249,975.10 GNMA POOL #0491103 6.390 6.109 AAA 98.219 237,291.05 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/95 AAA 245,523.04 .06 26,177.06 GNNA POOL 40466720 6.390 6.109 AAA 98.219 24,047.76 .00 36210AVH6 6.000E 12/15/2020 DO 12/01/98 AAA 25,710.85 .01 44,474.07 GNMA POOL #0497343 6.390 6.109 AAA 98.219 42,215.62 .01 36210NP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 43,691.99 .01 49,120.78 GNNA POOL #0469688 6.391 6.109 AAA 98.219 46,626.37 .01 36209EXRO 6.000E 11/15/2028 DO 11/01/90 AAA 48,245.94 .01 54,156.69 GNRA POOL 00467279 6.391 6.109 AAA 98.219 51,406.55 .01 36209CCQ7 6.0001 10/15/2D28 DO 10/01/99 AAA 53,192.16 .01 96,962.33 GNNA POOL 00457814 6.391 6.109 AAA 98.219 82,546.27 .02 362000SB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/90 AAA 85,423.53 .02 941,129.48 GNMA POOL 00467206 6.391 6.109 AAA 98.219 893,337.75 .25 36209CCA2 6.000% 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/98 AAA 924,367.96 .23 929,056.01 GNMA POOL #0465555 6.392 6.109 AAA 98.219 001,877.30 .25 36209AE48 6.ODD0 09/15/2020 DO 09/01/90 AAA 912,509.52 .23 34,128.48 GERA POOL #0483452 6.392 6.I09 AAA 98.219 32,395.39 .00 36209NBV3 6.000% 09/15/2020 DO 09/01/90 AAA 33,520.65 .01 904,092.96 GNNA POOL #0465546 6.392 6.109 AAA 98.219 858,167.75 .24 36209AET3 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AAA 807,976.33 .22 866,551.02 GNNA POOL #0468339 6.392 6.109 AAA 98.219 822,546.49 .23 36209DHQQ 6.000% 00/15/2020 DO 00/O1190 AAA 051,117.75 .21 46,749.48 GNNA POOL /0438057 6.393 6.109 AAA 98.219 44,375.40 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 45,916.87 .01 46,413.10 GNNA POOL 00460330 6.393 6.109 AAA 98.219 44,056.18 .01 36209DMF4 6.OD00 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 45,586.48 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 WSM7522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/01 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIM a 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 29,100,000.OG FEDERAL NONE LN BK CONS BDS 6.404 6.615 AAA 103.937 29,443,671.00 8.31 3133NBY84 6.835% 00/15/2003 UP OB/D7/00 AAA 30,245,667.00 7.47 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO KIN 6.440 6.322 A2 100.D31 4,000,000.00 1.09 44181HZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 A 4,001,240.00 .99 2,00D,000.00 FRLHC NULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.496 6.459 AAA 100.657 2,000,888.00 .55 3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AM 2,013,140.00 .50 2,533,756.66 FHLMC HULTICLASH CTF HER 1620E 6.499 6.812 AAA 88.080 2,377,618.72 .61 3133T13A4 6.000% 21/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 2,231,734.63 .55 2,000,000.00 HEUER FINANCIAL INC HIS 6.507 7.024 A3 100.124 2,000,000.00 .55 423329SKO FLTG RT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,002,480.00 .49 2,000,OOD.00 SALOME SB SLUGS NTH 6.625 3.009 AA3 100.000 2,000,000.00 .54 79549EBRO FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 A 2,000,000.00 .49 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNHA SF MTG 6.626 7.I36 AAA 103.406 14,424,607.50 3.90 OSNO60625 8.0001 02/15/2030 AAA 14,476,840.00 3.50 7,176,905.84 FRLMC GROUP 4G5-0406 6.620 6.955 AM 100.645 3,289,044.99 1.98 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 7,223,196.88 1.79 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS SLOGS MTH TR OD333 6.672 7.682 A2 100.432 2,322,379.00 .63 52517PPWS FLTG RT 04/01/2002 DO 03/29/99 A 2,309,936.00 .57 2,DOO,OOD.0D LEHRAN BROS HUGE MIN 6.604 7.320 A2 100.406 2,000,000.00 .55 52517PQQ9 FLTG RT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A 2,D08,120.00 .50 1,559,261.30 GNMA 1I POOL 4000088M 6.705 6.3D9 AAA 101.047 1,593,370.23 .43 36225CC20 3.335% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 1,575,506.85 .39 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL GORE LN HIS COST DENS 6.311 6.289 AAA 100.172 10,323,075.00 2.89 3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/99 AAA 10,518,060.00 2.60 2,000,000.00 HARSH 6 HCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.910 6.486 A2 102.141 1,992,280.00 .56 531148AB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,D42,820.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MR CH. CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.039 6.502 A2 101.788 2,995,DBO.00 .83 345393SJ3 6.300% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 A 3,053,640.00 .75 900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BK CONS BDS 6.000 6.635 AAA 101.734 899,550.00 .25 3133MQJI 6.750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 915,606.00 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 30 OCSFO7522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/01 DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY MAAEET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL 5,450,000.00 CIT GNP INC MTN 4SR 00042 6.810 6.032 Al 99.671 5,450,000.00 1.49 13560PBT7 FLTG RT 09/13/20D2 DO 09/01/00 A+ 5,432,069.50 1.34 7,000,000.00 J P WONSAN CHASE 6 CO GAL NT 6.843 6.726 Al 100.364 6,953,380.00 1.93 46625RAJ9 6.750E 02/01/2011 DO OIV30101 A+ 7,025,480.00 1.74 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE ROM INS INC NT 6.866 6.702 A3 102.208 2,490,400.00 .70 22233UAB0 6.850E 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,555,200.00 .63 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 6.960 7.403 A2 100.109 7,300,000.00 2.00 682680AJ2 FLTG AT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,307,957.00 1.81 1,141,008.45 GNWA II POOL 00080023 6.992 7.075 AAA 100.703 1,159,906.41 .31 36225CMD 7.125E 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,149,029.74 .20 1,962,499.66 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 6.913 AAA 101.253 1,959,433.25 .54 3837H3C70 7.000% 12/20/2022 AAA 1,987,089.78 .49 7,0DO,D00.00 OLD SENT BE MIN SS 00001 7.084 7.529 A2 99.734 7,000,000.00 1.91 67982SAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A- 6,981,380.00 1.72 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MID ASSN DEBS 7.113 6.279 AAA 105.516 2,030,133.00 .60 31359MCY5 6.625E 09/15/2005 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,215,836.00 .55 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 7.276 7.364 AAA 101.848 1,222,171.88 .33 218072627 7.500E 02/20/2031 AAA 1,222,171.98 .30 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 0.264 SAA3 99.220 2,151,250.00 .54 542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD 03/20/93 A- 1,964,400.00 .49 1,300,657.51 GAEYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA 495-7 7.564 7.430 AAA 100.000 1,201,655.71 .35 398100AE4 7.430E 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 1,300,657.51 .32 1,000,000.DO FORD ROTOR CR CO NT 7.582 6.633 A2 101.765 965,170.00 .27 345397GV9 6.750E 05/15/2005 A 1,017,650.00 .25 970,511.10 WMP/BUNTOON PAIGE 0000-11150 7.684 7.667 AAA 97.028 949,432.09 .26 302998GE3 7.500E 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 949,432.89 .23 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECO NEW 0TR 00115 7.709 7.052 A2 103,520 2,950,530.00 .BS 69512EEU5 7.300E 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,105,600.00 .77 35,200,OU0.00 FEDERAL NAIL MIG ASSN RIG 7.724 6.548 AAA 99.266 32,499,400.00 9.60 31364GYJ2 6.500% 03/12/2009 DO 03/12/99 AAA 34,941,632.00 8.63 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2001/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/06/01 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE i 10.54.10 PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARNBT VALUE 8 TOTN. _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,600,000.00 Al-TATE CORD SR NT 7.967 7.336 Al 106.768 1,594,032.00 .46 020002AL5 7.875% 05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 A+ 1t108,288.00 .42 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL PIKED INCOME SECURITIES ; 5.258 5.903 357,286,733.23 100.00 363,915,393.74 99.90 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL 5.259 5.834 398,109,019.54 100.00 404,737,680.05 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGF— 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -314AN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 08-Jan-2001 1,398,228.49 NA9123459 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 0.00 CD 09 Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 264an-2001 8,000,000.00 NA9123459 0.00 CD 26-Ian-2001 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,156.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2001 -12,156.54 9%085247 02-Jan-2001 12,156.54 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12,156.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Ian-2001 -12,156.54 9%085247 024an-2001 0.00 PC 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,471.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Ian-2001 •4,471.57 996085247 04-Ian-2001 4,471.57 B 0.00 13-Feb-200/ 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,471.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Ian-2001 -4.471.57 996085247 04-1an-2001 0.00 FC 04-Im-20D1 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.0D FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Jan-2001 -2,779,053.67 313589CCS MAT 02/20/2001 04-1.-2001 2,779,053.67 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Jan-2001 -2,779,053.67 313589CC5 MAT 02/20/2001 04-Jm-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 04-Jm-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,000,0OO.OD FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Jen-2001 -2,961.500.00 313589DRI MAT 03/29/2001 044m-2001 2,961,500.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Jm-2001 -2,961,500.00 313589DRI MAT 0329/2001 04-Jm-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Jan-2001 -3,363,832,50 313397DB4 MAT 03/152001 05-Jm-2001 3,363,832.50 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Jm-2001 -3,363.832.50 313397DB4 MAT031152001 05-1m-2001 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 05-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Feb-1001 8.31:43 Eeecu(/ve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE) AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 33,586.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Jan-2001 -33,586.93 996085247 05-1an-2001 33,586.83 B i 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 33,586.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Jan-2001 -33,596.83 996085247 05-1.-2001 0.00 FC 05-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,408,245.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-1an-2001 -1,408,245.20 996085247 08-lan-2001 1,408,245.20 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,408,245.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-1an-2001 -1,409,245.20 996085247 08-lan-2001 0.00 FC 08-tan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 179,749.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-1an-2001 -179,749.87 996095247 10-1an-2001 179,749.87 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 179,749.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Jan-2001 -179,749.87 996095247 10-1an-2001 0.00 FC 10-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,075.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Jan-2001 -65,075.80 996085247 12-1an-2001 65,075.80 B 0.00 /3-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 65,075.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I2-Jm-2001 -65,075.80 996095247 12.Jm-2001 0.00 PC 124m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Jm-2001 -3,100,000.00 99377D355 05.920%01/16/20DI DO 01/12/ 12-Jm-2001 3,100,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Jm-2001 -3,100,000.00 99377D355 05.92D%01/162001 DD01/121 12-Jm-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 12-/m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 16,172.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 164m-2001 -1072.47 996085247 16-Jm-2001 16,172.47 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,172.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Jm-2001 -IC172.47 996085247 16-Jm-2001 0.00 PC 16-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16Jm-2001 -3,995,418.89 36959HNPS 01232001 16-Jm-2001 3,995,419.89 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.0D GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-Im-2001 -3,995,419.99 36959HNP8 01232001 16-Jm-2001 0.00 PC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 164m-2001 0.00 13-Feb-1001 8:31:43 &x Wiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: S PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 94,110.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jan-2001 -94,110.99 996085247 17-Jan-2001 94,110.99 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 94,110.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Ian-2001 -94,110.99 996085247 17-Ian-2001 0.00 FC 17-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,709.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Inn-2001 -44,709.00 996087094 17-1.2001 44,709.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 174an-2001 -1,181,902.67 36959HRRO 04/252001 17-Ian-2001 1,181,902.67 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-Jan-2001 -1,191,902.67 36959HRRO 0425/2001 17-Ian-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 17-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,941.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I84am2001 -5,941.33 996085247 19-1.-2001 5,941.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,941.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 18-1an-2001 -5,941.33 996085247 18-Ian-2001 0.00 FC 19.3an-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 ExecuNre Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,140.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Jon-2001 -63,140.79 9196085247 18-Jan-2001 63,140.78 B i 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,140.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-1an-2001 -63,140.78 996085247 184nn-2001 0.00 FC 18-Inn-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 18-Ian-2001 -594,058.67 590181QP2 03/23/2001 18-Jan-2001 594,058.67 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH CO DISC 18-Jan-2001 -594.058.67 59018JQP2 0323/2001 18-Jan-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 18-Ion-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 18-Ian-2001 -3,381,569.22 63743CPM9 02/212001 18-Jan-2001 3,381,568.22 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC IS-Jan-2001 -3,381,569.22 63743CPM9 02/21/2001 18-Jan-2001 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK I84m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 436,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Jan-2001 436,500.00 996085247 19-Jan-2001 436,500.00 B 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31.43 Fsecmive Workbnrcb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 436,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Jm-2001 ,436,500.00 996095247 19-Ian-2001 0.00 FC 19•Jm-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Jm-2001 -881,577.00 36959HT64 06/06/2001 194an-2001 881,577.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Jm-2001 -881,577.00 36959HT64 06/06/2001 194m-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Im-2001 -694,043.19 313589DB6 MAT 03/15/2001 19-3m-2001 6%,043.19 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-lm-2001 -694,043.19 313589DB6 MAT 03/15/2001 19-Jm-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Jm-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,994.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-im-2001 -3,994.67 996085247 22-Jm-2001 3,994.67 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,994.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Ian-2001 -3,994.67 996085247 22-1m-2001 0.00 FC 22-tan-2001 0.00 13-Fe6.2001 8.31:43 Encultm Wmkbenc6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 658,769.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Inn-2001 -659,769.87 996085247 22-1nn-2001 659,769.87 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 658,769.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 224an-2001 -658,769.87 996085247 22-Jon-2001 0.00 PC 22-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 22-Jan-2001 -888,576.00 13443ARG2 04/16/2001 22-Jan-2001 888,576.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 22-Jen-2001 -898,576.00 13443ARG2 04/16/2001 22-1en-2001 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 22-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,460.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Ian-2001 -10,460.97 996085247 24-Inn-2001 10,460.97 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,460.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jen-2001 -10,460.97 996085247 24-1en-2001 0.00 PC 24-ten-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,378,091.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jan-2001 -3,378,091.00 996095247 24-Jan-2001 3,378,091.00 B 0.00 13-Feb-200/ 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01,JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSIYCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,378,091.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jan-2001 -3,378,091.00 996085247 244en-2001 0.00 FC i 24-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Jan-2001 -99,622.36 07588RRR8 04/252001 24Jan-2001 99,622.36 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Ian-2001 -98,622.36 07588RRRB 04252001 24-Jan-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Jan-2001 -790,916.67 07588RR98 04/092001 24-Jan-2001 790,916.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Jan-2001 -790,916.67 07588RR98 04/092001 24-Jan-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Jan-2001 -3,353,675.00 36959HRRO 04252001 25-Jan-2001 3,353,675.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-Ian-2001 -3,353,675.00 36959HRRO 04/252001 25-Ian-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 254an-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Exeeanve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,100,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-Jan-2001 -3,087,350.28 63743CPM9 02/21/2001 26-1an-2001 3,097,350.28 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,I00,0WOO NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-Jan-2001 -3,087,350.28 63743CPM9 02212001 26-Jan-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 26-1an-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 26-1an-2001 -8,000,000.00 99377P556 05.950%01/292001 DD0126/ 26-Jan-2001 8,000,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 26-1an-2001 -8,000,000.00 99377P556 05.950%01/292001 DO 0126/ 26-Jan-2001 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 387,630.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Jan-2001 -387,630.92 996085247 29-Jan-20D1 387,630.92 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 387,630.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Jan-2001 -387,630.92 996085247 29-Jan-2001 0.00 PC 29-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 29-Jan-2001 -599,162.33 13443ASX4 05/31/2001 29-Jan-2001 589,162.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 &ecatm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE li PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 29-Jn-2001 -599.162.33 13443ASX4 05/31/2001 29-Jm-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 29-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,268,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Jan-2001 -7,145,413.07 63743CSQ7 05/24/2001 29-Jan-2001 7,145,413.07 B MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,268,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 29-Jan-2001 -7,145,413.07 63743CSQ7 05/24/2001 29JM-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 29-Jan-2001 0.0D LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 70,374.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Ian-2001 -70,374.50 996085247 31-1an-2001 70,374.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 70,374.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jan-2001 -70,374.50 996085247 31-Jan-2001 0.00 FC 31-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 31-Jan-2001 -4,869,585.97 63743CQDS 03/13/2001 314an-2001 4,869,585.97 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4,900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 31-Jan-2001 4,869,585.97 63743CQDS 03/132001 31-Jan-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 31-Jan-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Eeecuff a Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOool0000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLJDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-Nov-2000 5,932,617.19 OIN060619 6.000%01/152030 23-Jan-2001 -5,932,617.19 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 29-Nov-2000 10,704,804.69 OIN062615 6.500%01/152030 23-Jan-2001 -10,704,804.69 BC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 29-Nov-2000 -10,704,804.69 OIND62615 6.500%01/152031 234an-2001 10,704,304.69 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-Nov-2000 -10.704,804.69 OIN062615 6.5009/601/152031 234m-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,707.67 GNMA POOL#0506636 29-Nov-2000 -70,913.92 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/011 234 2001 70,913.92 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,707.67 GNMA POOL#0506636 29-Nov-2000 -273.93 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/OI/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,707.67 GNMA POOL#0506636 29-Nov-2000 -71,187.85 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 234an-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Tan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Esecalkv Wwkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' l3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIFFION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,474.07 GNMA PGOL 60497343 29-Nov-200D -42,215.62 362IONP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/011 23-Jm-2001 4$215.62 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,474.07 GNMA POOL80497343 29-Nov-2000 •163.07 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2029 DD 12/01/ 234m-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,474.07 GNMA POOL 80497343 29-Nov-2000 -42,379.69 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,668.05 GNMA POOLA0500917 29-Nov-2000 -23,415.38 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 23-Jm-2001 23,415.39 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,668.05 GNMA POOLN0500917 29-Nov-2000 -90.45 36210SPAO 6.00D%04/15/2029DD04A11/ 23-Jm-20D1 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,668.05 GNMA POOL 80500917 29-Nov-2000 -23,505.83 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 041011 23-Jm-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 899,079.84 GNMA POOL#0496461 29-Nov-2000 -853,423.44 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 011011 23-Jm-2001 853,423.44 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 T e.tm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 899,079.84 ONMA POOL80496461 29-Nov-2000 -3,296.63 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 899,079.84 GNMA POOL 804%461 29-Nov-2000 -856,720.07 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23.1am2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 923,049.05 GNMA POOL#0503389 29-Nov-2000 -876,175.47 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DO 03101/ 23-Jan-2001 376,175.47 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 923,049.05 ONMA POOLN0503388 29-Nov-2000 -3,384.51 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DO 03/011 234an-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 923,049.05 ONMA POOL805033B8 29-Nov-2000 -979,559.98 36210VF53 6.000%0 3/1 5 2029 DO 03101/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,975.10 GNMA POOL 00491103 29-Nov-2000 -237,281.05 36210FRY4 6.000%O1/152029 DD 0I/01/ 23,Ian-2001 237,281.05 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,975.10 GNMA POOL 40491103 29-Nov-2000 -916.59 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/OI/ 234an-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 13-Feb-100/ 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: IS PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,975.10 GNMA POOL#0491103 29-Nov-2000 -239,197.63 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 0 110 11 23-Jm-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 234m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,120.79 GNMA POOL#0469698 29-Nov-2000 -46,626.37 36209EXR8 6.006%11/1S/2028 DO I MU 23-Jan-2001 4C626.37 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,120.78 GNMA POOLOD469698 29-Nov-2000 -180.11 36209EXRS 6.000%11/15/2028DD11/01/ 23-Jm.2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,120.78 GNMA POOL N0469688 29-Nov-2000 46,806.48 36209EXRS 6.000%11/15/2028 DD I I/01/ 23-Im-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 866,551.02 GNMA POOL#0468339 29-Nov-2000 •822,546.48 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 234m-2001 822,546.49 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 866,551.02 GNMA POOL#0468339 29-Nov-2000 -3,177.35 36209DIIQO 6.000%08/15/2028DD08PoI/ 234m-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 866.551.02 GNMA POOL#0468339 29-Nov-2000 -925,723.93 36209DHQO 6.000%09/15/2029 DD OW11 23-Jm-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Fe&2001 8.31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 014AN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 904,077.96 GNMA POOL#0465546 29-Nov-2000 -859,167.75 36209AET3 6.000%0 911 5/20 2 8 DD OS/01/ 23-Jan-2001 959,167.75 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 904,077.% GNMA POOL#0465546 29-Nov-2000 -3,314.95 36209AET3 6.0000,6WI5/2028DD08/01/ 234en-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 904,077.96 GNMA POOL#0465546 29-Nov-2000 -861,482.70 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028DDO&'Oli 23-Jen-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-1en-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 54,156.69 ONMA POOL#0467279 29•Nov-2000 -51,406.55 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 101011 23-Jen-2001 51,406.55 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,156.69 ONMA POOL#0467279 29-Nov-2000 -199.57 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 23-Jen-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,156.69 GNMA POOL 90467279 29-Nov-2000 -51,605.12 36209CCQ7 6.000%1 011 5202 9 DO 10/011 23-1an-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jen-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 96,962.33 GNMA POOL#0457814 29-Nov-2000 .32,546.27 36208QSB3 6.000%10t1512028 DO 10/01/ 23-Jan-2001 82.546.27 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 EEma.Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -314AN-2001 OCSD-CONSOUDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 96,962.33 GNMA POOL 00457814 29-Nov-2000 -318.86 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2029 DD 10/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 IB i0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 86,962.33 GNMA POOL 80457814 29-Nov-2000 -82,865,13 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 23-Jm.2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,398.28 GNMA POOL 80499153 29-Nov-2000 .25,057.74 3621000ES 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 234m-20M 25,037.74 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,399.29 GNMA POOL#0499153 29-Nov-2000 .96.79 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,398.28 GNMA POOL80499153 29-Nov-2000 -25,154.53 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 234m-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 941,129.48 GNMA POOL80467286 29-Nov-2000 -893,337.75 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 23-Jm4001 993,337.75 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 941,129.48 GNMA POOL80467286 29-Nov-2000 -3A50.81 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 23-Jm-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 13-Fe&2001 8.31:43 Ex llw Wmkbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-.TAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 941,129.48 GNMA POOLN0467286 29-Nov-2000 -896,798.56 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,749.48 GNMA POOLN0438057 29-Nov-2000 -44,375.48 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152029 DO 051011 23-Im-2001 44,375.48 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,749.48 GNMA POOLN0438057 29-Nov-2000 -171.41 36207PT749 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,749.48 ONMA POOL N0438057 2%Nov-2000 44,546.89 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 23-Jm-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&00,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 929,056.01 ONMA POOLN0465555 29-Nov-2000 -981,977.38 36209AE49 6.000%09/152028 DD 09/01/ 23-Jm4001 881,877.38 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 929,056.01 GNMA POOLN0465555 29-Nov-2000 -3,406.54 36209AE48 6.000%09/152029 DO 09/011 234m-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 929,056.01 GNMA POOLN0465555 29-Nov-2000 -885,283.92 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DD 09/01/ 234m-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Fe&2001 8:3h43 Evocudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,128.48 GNMA POOLN0483452 29-Nov-2000 -32,395.39 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 23-Jon-2001 32,395.39 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,128.48 GNMA POOL 00483452 29-Nov-2000 -125.14 36209WBV3 6.000%0 911 5/2 0 28 DO 09/011 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,128 48 GNMA POOL 80483452 29-Nov-2000 -32,520.53 36209WBV3 6.000%0 911 5/202 8 DO D9/01/ 234m.2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-lan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,177.06 GNMA POOL80486720 29-Nov-2000 -24,847.76 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 23-Jw-2001 24,947.76 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 26,177.06 GNMA POOL 80486720 29-Nov-2000 -95.99 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 23-Jen-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,177.06 GNMA POOL80486720 29-Nov-2000 -24,943.74 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 23-Jen-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jw-2001 D.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,725.52 ONMA POOL80496284 29-Nov-2000 -11,571.49 36210MJSI 6.000%01/152029 DO 021011 23-Jan-2001 21,571.49 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 E ecullw Wakkmh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT) SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST) TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAW/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,725.52 GNMA POOL 90496284 29-Nov-2000 -83.33 36210MJ51 6.0009/601/152029 DD 02/01/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,725.52 GNMA POOL80496284 29-Nov-2000 -21,654.82 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,413.10 GNMA POOL80468330 29-Nov-2000 -44,056.18 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/ 23-Jen-2001 44,056.18 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,413.10 GNMA POOL40468330 29-Nov-2000 -170.19 36209DHF4 6.0001/605/152028DD05/01/ 23-1an-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,413.10 GNMA POOL 90468330 29-Nov-2000 -44,226.36 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 05101/ 23-Jan-2001 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 30-Nov-2000 3,417,149.44 OIN062615 6.500%01/152030 23-Jan-2001 -3,417,148.44 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 30-Nov-2000 -3,417,148.44 OIN062615 &500%01/152031 23-Jan-2001 3,417,149.44 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbersch ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILDSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 30-Nov-2000 -3,417,148.44 OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2031 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-1en-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMITTO FUR GNMA U JUMBOS 05-DW-2000 1,209,750.00 21 H072619 7.500%01/20T2031 234am2001 -1,209,750.00 BC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 05-Dec-2000 -1,209,750.00 21HO72619 7.500%01/20/2031 23-Jen-2001 1,209,750.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 05-Dm-2000 -1,209,750.00 21HO72619 7.500%01/20/2031 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-3an-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Dec-2000 -IZ295,000.00 OIN080617 8.000%01/15/2030 23-Jen-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Jen-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Deo-2000 -2,049,750.00 OIN080617 8.000%01/15/2030 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS @ CO INC,NY 23-Jen-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 024an-2001 -75,271.50 3133MCAZ8 6.125%09/28R001 DD 09/28/0 034an-2001 75,271.50 B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00 13-Feb-200/ 8:31:43 Fxecut[w Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINfLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DDS 02-Jan-2001 -1,296.46 3133MCAZ8 6.125%09/28/2001 DO 09/28/0 03-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 75,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 02-1an-2001 -76,557.96 3133MCAZ8 6.125%0928/2001 DO 09/28/0 03-Jan-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 03-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 03-Jan-2001 -397,312.00 3133M6R67 4.975%1123/2001 DO 11/23/9 04-Ian-2001 397,312.00 B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 03-Jan-2001 -2,266.39 3133M6R67 4.975%11/23/2001 DO 11/2319 04-lan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 034an-2001 -399,579.39 3133M6R67 4.975%1123/2001 DO 1123/9 04-Ian-2001 0.00 PC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 04-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 820,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 03-Jan-2001 -818,442.00 3133M5DS6 5.580%08/17/2001 DO 08/17/9 04-Ian-2001 818,442.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 820,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 03-Jan-2001 -17,412.70 3133M5DS6 5.580%08/17/2001 DO 08117/9 04-Jan-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 FaemNt Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -314AN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 820,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 03-1an-2001 -835,854.70 3133M5DS6 5.580%08/17/2001 DD08/17/9 04-1en-2001 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 04-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 09-Jan-2001 -2,179,375.00 912810EQ7 06.250%08/15/2023 DD 08/15/ 10-Jan-2001 2,179,375.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 09-Jan-2001 -50,271.74 912810EQ7 06.250%09/15/2023 DD 08/15/ 10-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 09-3an-2001 -2,229,646.74 912810EQ7 06.250%09/15/2023 DO 08115/ 10-Jan-2001 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 10-1an-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16•Jan-2001 -2,060,000.00 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 2,060,000.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Jan-2001 -12,364,687.50 OIN080625 8.000%02/152030 20-Feb-2001 12,364,687.50 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA II JUMBOS 17-JU-2001 -1,222,171.88 21 H072627 7.500%02/202031 20-Feb-2001 1,222,171.88 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 13-Feb-1001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 18-Jan-2001 -3,489,062.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/15/2030 20-Feb-2001 3,489,062.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 18-Ian-2001 -10,969,062.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/15/2030 20-Fcb-2001 10,969,062.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 194an-2001 -200,106.00 3133M5BC3 5.500%08/13/2001 DO O911319 22-Jan-2001 200,106.00 B ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 19-1eo-2001 -4,858.33 3133MSBC3 5.500%08/132001 DD08/13/9 22-3an-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000A0 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 194an-2001 -204,964.33 3133MSBC3 5.500%08/132001 DO 08/1319 22-Jan-2001 0.00 FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 22-Ian-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 1 P MORGAN CHASE&CO GBL NT 25-Jan-2001 -6,953,380.00 46625HA19 6.750%02/01/2011 DD01/3010 30-Jan•2001 6,953,380.00 B MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 1 P MORGAN CHASE&CO GBL NT 25-3an-2001 -6,953,380.00 46625HA19 6.750%02/012011 DO 01/3010 30-Jan-2001 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED INCO 30-Jan-2001 0.00 13-F6-2001 &31:43 &ecufive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE' 2s PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000loo00 014AN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 80D64 31Jan-2001 439,583.20 17120QJ36 5.250%10222001 DO 10/22/9 05-Feb2001 438,583.20 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL CORP MTN 80064 31-Jan-2001 -8,983.33 17120QJ36 5.250%10/222001 DO 1022/9 05-Feb-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,00D.00 BALTIMORE GAS&ELEC CO 31-Jea-2001 -3,038,250.00 059165DN7 6.750%1VI52002 DD 121M 05.Feh-2001 3,038,250.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,ODO,000.00 BALTIMORE OAS&ELEC CO 31-Ian-2001 -25,312.50 059165DN7 6.750%IV152002 DD 1220/0 05-Feb-2001 0.00 IB 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Dee-2000 -32.00 3133TC995 VARRT08/152032 15-Dx-2000 32.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Den-200D 32.00 3133TCE95 VARRTOO/152032 15-Dee-2000 0.00 PC 17-JM-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Eemathe Wwkbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSE LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,605A3 FHLMC MULTICLASS CfF SER 162 014m-2001 -12,605.93 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 014m-2001 12,605.83 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,605.83 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIT SER 162 01-Ian-2001 -12,605.83 31331'17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 014m-2001 0.00 FC 174m-200I 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,290,208.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 024m-2001 3,290,208.35 996085247 024m-2001 -3.290,208.35 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,290,208.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2001 3,290,209.35 996085247 02-Jm-2001 0.00 FC 02-Jm-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -76,557.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jm-2001 76,557.96 996085247 03-Jm-2001 -76,557.% S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -76,557.% DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Im-2001 76,557.% 996085247 03-Jm-2001 0.00 FC 03-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Feb-200/ 8.31:43 &emtiw Wwkbeeh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADEDATIV - AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,143.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jan-2001 1,093,143.33 996085247 03-JM-2001 -1,093,143.33 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,143.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jo-2001 1,093,143.33 996085247 034an-2001 0.00 FC 03-1an-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Jan-2001 688,413.54 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 04-lan-2001 -679,786.53 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 8,627.01 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Ian-2001 689,413.54 912795GC9 04/192001 DD 10/19/00 044an-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 04-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Jan-2001 393,665.00 912795GC9 04/192001 DD 10/19/00 04-Jan-2001 -388,449.44 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 5,215.56 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Ian-2001 393,665.00 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 044an-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 044an-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Ian-2001 98,379.79 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 04-1en-2001 -97,112.36 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 1,267.43 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Ex..d.Wm*bewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 03-Jen-2001 98,379.79 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 04-Jan-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 04-ten-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 04-Jan-2001 1,085,798.00 313397AL5 MATOI/11/2001 05-Jen-2001 -1,085,798.00 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Jan-2001 13,134.00 313397AL5 MAT01/112001 05-Jon-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS O4Jen-2001 1,098,922.00 313397AL5 MAT01/112001 05-3an-2001 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEWYORK 05-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DI 04-Jan-2001 2,280,220.00 313397AJO MAT01/092001 05-Jan-2001 -2,280,220.00 S HSRC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DI 04-Jen-2001 18,277.33 313397A10 MAT 01/09/2001 05-1en-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DI 044en-2001 2,298,497.33 313397AJO MATOI/092001 054an-2001 0.00 FC HSBC SECS MG NEW YORK 05-Jen-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000,00 GMAC DISC 10-lan-2001 790,524.45 37042DNQ2 01/24/2001 10-1an-2001 -790,524.45 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 GMAC DISC 10-Jan-2001 7.627.55 37042DNQ2 01/24/2001 10-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 GMAC DISC 10-Jan-2001 798,152.00 37042DNQ2 01/24/2001 104an-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 11-Jan-2001 300,000.00 996085247 11-1an-2001 -300,000.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Jan-2001 300.000.00 996085247 11-Jan-2001 0.00 FC II-Jan-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Jan-2001 3,100,000.00 99377D355 05.920%01/16/2001 DD 011121 16-Jan-2001 -3,100,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.D0 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Jan-2001 2,039.11 99377D35$ 05.920%01/16/2001 DD01/12/ 164an-2001 0.00 13 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Executive Wo kbetrcb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GADWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Jan-2001 3,102,039.11 99377D355 05.920%01/16/2001 DO 01/121 16-Ian-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,709.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 18-Jan-2001 44,709.00 9%087094 18-Ian-2001 -44,709.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -50,620.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Jan-2001 50,620.19 996085247 19-Jan.2001 -50,620.19 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -50,620.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 194an-2001 50,620.19 996085247 19.1an-2001 0.00 PC 19-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 22-Jan-2001 197,535.00 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 22-Jan-2001 -194,224.72 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 3,310.28 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 22-1n-2001 197,535.00 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 22-Ln-2001 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 224 2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,202,641.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23.1an-2001 1,202,641.17 996095247 23.1an-2001 -1,202,641.17 S 0.00 13-Feb.2001 8:31:43 E%acaHW Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3% PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED 3HARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,202,641.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Jan-2001 1,202,641.17 996085247 23-Jan-2001 0.00 FC 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 23-Jan-2001 296,112.75 07588RNX9 01/31/2001 23-Jan-2001 -296,112.75 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 23-Jan-2001 3,488.58 07588RNX9 01/31/2001 23-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 23-Jan-2001 299,601.33 07588RNX9 01/31/2001 23-1en-2001 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23-Jon-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,332,924.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-1an-2001 3,332,924.83 996085247 25-Jen-2001 -3,332,824.83 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,332,824.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Jan-2001 3,332,924.83 996085247 25-1un-2001 0.00 FC 25-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,632.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26Jan-2001 37,632.79 996085247 26-Jan-2001 -37,632.78 S 0.00 13-Feb-100/ 8:31:43 Execudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINAOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,632.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Jan-2001 37,632.78 996085247 26-1m-2001 0.00 FC 26-Jun-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 294m-2001 8,000,000.00 99377P556 05.950%01/29/2001 DO 01/261 294m-2001 -8,000,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000,00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Jnn-2001 3,966.67 99377P556 05.950%01292001 DO 012& 294m-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 294m-2001 8,003,966.67 99377P556 05.950%01/292001 DO 0126/ 29-Jen-2001 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Jen-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -475,045.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Jan-2001 475,045.28 996085247 304m-2001 475,045.28 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -475,045.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 304m-2001 475,045.28 996085247 30Jm-2001 0.00 FC 30-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 30Jm-2001 6,468,918.50 63743CPM9 02212001 30-Im-2001 -6,468,918.50 S MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 F" mJtve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 30-Jan-2001 8,956.22 63743CPM9 02/21/2001 30-Jm-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 30-Jan-2001 6,477,874.72 63743CPM9 0221/2001 30-Jan-2001 0,00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED[NCO 30-Jan-2001 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -605,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 05-Im-2001 605,199.65 81240QGW6 6.540%02/20/2003 DD 02/20/9 10-Jm-2001 -621,819.00 S ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA -16,619.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -605,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 05-Jan-2001 6,044.96 81240QGW6 6.540%02/20/2003 DO 0220/9 10-Im-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -605,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 05-Jan-2001 611,244.61 81240QGW6 6.540%02202003 DD 022019 10•Jm-2001 0.00 FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 10-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,030,000.00 PORTAUTHNY&NJ 09-Jm-2001 3,126,020.70 733581YS5 5,375%10/15/2035 DO 1011510 12-Jm-2001 -2,903,436.90 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 222,583.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,030,000.00 PORT AUTH NY&NJ 09-Jm-2001 39,358.43 733581YS5 5.375%10/152035 DD 1011510 12-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 13-Feb-1001 8.31:43 &ecuti.Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID 'TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,030,000.00 PORT AUTH NY&.NJ 09-3en-2001 3,165,379.13 733581YS5 5,375%1 0/1 51203 5 DD 10/1510 12-Jm.2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 12-Jm.2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Jm-2001 2,061,015.63 GIN080617 8.000%01/15/2031 23-Jm-2001 -2,047,678.57 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 13,337.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTO 16-Jm-2001 2,061,015.63 OIN080617 8.000%01/15/2031 234m-2001 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000,00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 16-Jm-2001 12,371,250.OD OIN080617 8.000%01/15/2031 23-Im-2001 .12,286,071.43 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 85,178.57 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG I&Jm-2001 12,371,250.00 OIN080617 8.000%01/1512031 23-Jm-2001 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23.Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 11 JUMBOS 174m-2001 1,222,875.00 21HO72619 7.500%01202031 23-1m-2001 -1,209,750.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 13,125.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA If JUMBOS 17-Jm-2001 1,222,975.00 21HO72619 7.500%0120/2031 23Jm-2001 0.D0 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-1m-2001 0.00 13-Fs6.1001 8:31:43 F=uliw Wmkbomh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGErr 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG06010000 01JAN-2001 -314AN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 18-Jan-2001 10,972,929.69 OIN062615 6.500%01/15/2031 23-Jm-2001 -10,713,205.92 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 259,723.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18Jm-2001 10,972,929.69 OIN062615 6.500%01/152031 23-Jan-2001 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-JM-2001 3,490,292.97 OIN062615 6.500%01/152031 23-Jan-2001 -3,408,747.31 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 91,545.66 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 18-Jan-2001 3,490,292.97 OIN062615 6.500%01/152031 23-1nn-2001 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 23-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 19-Im-2001 3,014,340.00 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/12/2002 DD 12/07/ 24-Jm-2001 -3,000,000.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 14,340.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 19-Jan-2001 25,513.33 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/I22002 DO 12/07/ 24-Jan-2001 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 19-Jan-2001 3,039,953.33 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/122002 DD 12/07/ 244an-2001 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Ececutim Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY N TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 23-1an-2001 2,998,320.00 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 04118/ 26-Jan-2001 -3,000,000.00 S SALOMON'IBROS INC,NEW YORK -1,690.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 23-Jan-2001 51,397.50 79548EEE8 FLTO RT 04282003 DO 0428/ 26-Jan-2001 0.00 1S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 234an-2001 3,049,717.50 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04292003 DO 0428/ 26-Ln-2001 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 264am2001 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,692.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Nov-2000 -44,692.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Nov-2000 44,731.37 PDC 48.87 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -44,714.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Nov-2000 44,714.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Nov-2000 44,763.40 PD -48.90 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44.714.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Nov-2000 44,714.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 17-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Fe6-2001 8.31:43 Executive Wa kbekh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 014AN-2001 -314AN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,347.95 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Dec-2000 2,347.95 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Dec-2000 OAO FC i 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,939.39 OREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Dec-2000 1,939.39 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 02/2910 01-Dec-2000 -1,911.06 PD 28.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,939.39 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Dec-2000 1,939.39 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/29/0 01-Dec-2000 0.00 FC 09 Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,239.36 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 01-1an-2001 51,239.36 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 014an-2001 -52,039.97 PD -800.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,239.36 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 014an-2001 51,239.36 3129DDQ55 7.0001/602/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-3an-2001 0.00 FC 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,812.90 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 014an-2001 43,812.90 3133T02D5 5.900%0611512017 01-Jan-2001 -43,751.29 PD 61.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,812.90 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Inn-2001 43,812.90 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Jan-2001 0.00 FC I6-Jea-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -10,914.98 GNMA 11 POOL 00080395 01-Jm-2001 10,914.98 36225CNM4 6,500%04/202030 DD 041011 01-Jan-2001 -10,816.06 PD 93.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .10,914.98 GNMA 11 POOL 90090395 01-1en-2001 10,914.98 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/01/ 01-lm-2001 O.OD FC 22.Jm-2001 0.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,716.05 GNMA II POOL 80080023 01-1m-2001 29,716.05 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/202026 DD 12101/ 01-Jan-2001 -30,209.22 PD -492.17 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -29,716.05 ONMA II POOL#0080023 01-1an-2001 29,716.05 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Jm-2001 0.00 FC 22-lm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,554.38 GNMA 11 POOL 0080088M 014md001 40,554.38 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 06/01N 01-Jm-2001 41,441.51 PD 487.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .40,534.38 ONMA II POOL 8080088M 014m-2001 40,554.38 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 06/01/9 01-Jm-2001 0.00 PC 22-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,500.34 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.2 PA 014m-2001 37,500.34 3837R3C70 7.000%122D2022 01-1m-2001 -37,441.75 PD 58.59 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Eteomllve Workbomh - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,500.34 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 01-Jan-2001 37,500.34 3837H3C70 7.000%1220/2022 01-1an-2001 0.00 PC 22-tan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -76,972.50 GNMA 11 POOL 9080408X 01-Jan-2001 76,972.50 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Jan-2001 -76.190.75 PD 781.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -76,972.50 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-1an-2001 76.972.50 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-1an-2001 0.00 PC 22-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,951.52 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Inn-2001 1,951.52 39810#AE4 7.430°/a06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-lan-2001 -1,923.01 PD 28.51 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,951.52 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01Jan-2001 1,951.52 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 014an-2001 0.00 FC 25-Inn-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -9,244.65 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Jan-2001 9,244.65 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2001 -9,019.31 PD 225.34 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,761.19 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Jaro2001 28,761.19 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 09/26/9 15-Jan-2001 -28,761.19 PD 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:3/:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000loo00 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,761.19 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Jam2001 28,761.19 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DD 0826t9 154eo-2001 0.00 FC 164an-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,566.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Jan-2001 1,566.35 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/15/9 15-Jan-2001 -1,566.35 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,566.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-tan-2001 1,566.35 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/1519 15-1.-2001 0.00 FC 16-Im-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,367.39 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 PH 164an-2001 38.367.39 3837HINX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jan-2001 -38,367.39 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,367.39 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 164an-2001 38,367.39 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jan-2001 0.00 FC 16.Jm.2001 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPRR-PIMCO -5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISC N 04-Jan-2001 5,734,532.50 3133E9AD5 MAT01/042001 04-Jon.2001 .5,734.532.50 MT 04-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-1.-2001 688,572.50 36959HNAI 01/10/2001 104ea-2001 -688,572.50 MT i 10-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 17-Jan-2001 1,183,239.67 37042DNH2 01/17/2001 17-Ian-2001 -1,183,239.67 MT 17-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 GMAC DISC 18-Jan-2001 593,649.00 37042DNIS 01/1S/2001 18-Jen-2001 -593,649.00 MT 18-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 ASSOCIATES CP NA DISC I84an-2001 3,357,185.50 04600JNJ9 01/18/2001 184an-2001 -3,357,185.50 MT 18-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -625,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Jan-2001 620,199.83 313397AU5 MAT01/19/2000 19-Jan-2001 -620,199.83 MT 19-Jen-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-hn-2001 884,771.25 3695914NK9 01/19/2001 19-Ian-2001 484,771.25 MT 19-Jen-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 HEINZ H J CO DISC 22-Jan-2001 880,825.00 42307JNN6 01/22/2001 22-Jan-2001 -880,825.00 MT 22-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-Jan-2001 3,995,419.89 369591TNP8 01232001 234an-2001 -3,995,419.99 MT 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GMAC DISC 24-Ian-2001 197,631.11 37042DNQ2 01242001 24-Jan-2001 -197,631.11 MT 24-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Jan-2001 891,762.50 07588RNQ4 01/242001 24-Jaro2001 -891,762.50 MT 244.-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 31-Jam2001 789,634.00 07588RNX9 01/312001 31-Jan-2001 -789,634.00 MT 31-Ian-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 31-Jan-2001 887,592.25 233SEONX0 01/31/2001 31-Jan-2001 -887,592.25 MT 31-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,240,000.00 NIKE INC DISC 31-Jan-2001 3,208,312.80 6541D2NX2 01/312001 31-Jan-2001 -3,208,312.80 MT 31-Ian-2001 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Fsecufiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l 0000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,417.00 REPS INFLATION SHARES 314m-2001 0.00 9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jan-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,410.00 REPS INFLATION SHARES 31-Jan-2001 0.00 9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jm-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,159.10 REPS INFLATION SHARES 31-Jm-2001 0.00 79549BBGI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 31-Jm-2001 0.00 SD 0.00 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 15-Sep-2000 -52,210.00 209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/ 15-Sep-2000 0.00 ITC 15-Sep-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 15-Dec-2000 -51,263.33 209111 CU5 FLTO RT 06/15/2002 DO 06120/ 15-Deo-2000 0.00 ITC 15-Deo-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Jm-2001 0.09 996087094 01Jm-2001 0.00 IT 02-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Ftecutiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS. LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN CORP NEW SUB 02-Jan-2001 11,718.75 16161ABLI 9.375%07/012001 DO 07/01/8 01-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Jan-2001 437.79 996085247 01-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 02-Jan-2001 45,347.06 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DD 0329/ 014aro2001 0.00 IT 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY HLTH CARE SER B 02-Jan-2001 46,193.75 64579ERMO 4.750%07/012028 DO 12/01/9 01-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-1ao-2001 5.061.59 996085247 01-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 02-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 04-Jan-2001 65,467.50 313589AD5 MAT 01/04/2001 04-Jnn-200I 0.00 IT 04-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,939.39 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 08-Ian-2001 8,077.32 398108AE4 7.430°/a06/01/2003 DO 02/29/0 01-Der 2000 0.00 IT 08-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31::43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE• 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-1m-2001 11,427.50 36959HNAI 01/102001 10-Jm-2001 0.00 1T 10-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 12-Jm-2001 50,%0.00 209111CU5 FLTO RT 0&152002 DO 06120/ 15-Dec-2000 0.00 IT 124m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 16-Jan-2001 48,750.00 046003HYS 6.500%07/152002 DO 07/1119 154m-2001 0.00 IT 16-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 16-Jm-2001 100,500.00 345397513 6.700%07/162004 DO 07/1619 16-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 16.Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,200,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 164m-2001 161,515.25 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 154m-2001 0.00 IT 16-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,000,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 16-Jm-2001 426,363.08 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/15/ 154m-2001 0.00 IT 16-Im-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,239.36 FHLMC GROUPIN05-0476 164m-2001 42,164.18 3128DDQ55 7.000%MMI2003 DD 021011 014 2001 0.00 IT 161m-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.:31:43 Emudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCOOE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,812.90 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 16-Jan-2001 321.67 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01•Jan-2001 0.00 IT 164an-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,347.95 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 16-Jan-2001 1,493.20 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Dec-2000 0.00 1T 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,761.19 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 16-Jan-2001 685.06 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DD 0826/9 15-Jan-2001 0.00 1T 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,566.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 16-Jan-2001 26.56 31677EAA4 6.200a/o09/012001 DO 031199 15-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,367.39 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 PH 16-Jan-2001 14,234.03 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 16-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 17-Jan-2001 16,760.33 37042DNH2 01/172001 17-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 17-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,605.83 FHLMC MULTICLASS C'1'F SER 162 17-Jan-2001 12,605.83 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/0119 01-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 17-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Execulhe Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,714.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A I74an-2001 15,448.28 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Dec-2000 0.00 IT 17-tan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 17-Jan-2001 32.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Da-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jen-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 ASSOCIATES CP NA DISC I8-Jan-2001 42,814.50 04600JNJ9 01/182001 184 n-2001 0.00 IT 18-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 GMAC DISC I8-Jan-2001 6,351.00 37042DNJ8 01/182001 18-Jen-2001 0.00 IT I8-Jen-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 194an-2001 436,500.00 31364G2V0 5.820%07/192001 DO 07/19/9 19-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 19-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 625,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Jen-2001 4,800.17 313397AU5 MAT01/1912000 19-1an-2001 0.00 IT 19-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Jan-2001 15,228.75 36959HNK9 01/192001 19-Im-2001 0.00 IT 19-Jan-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FML LLC MTN#TR006 22-Jm-2001 7,963.96 17120QE80 FLTG RT 09/082002 DO 04I08/ 204m-2001 0.00 IT i 224m-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IZ500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 22-Jm-2001 375,000.00 3134A3ZMI 6.000%07202001 DO 0720/9 20-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 22-Ian-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 HEINZ H 1 CO DISC 224m-2001 19,175.00 42307JNN6 011=001 22-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 22-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,716.05 GNMA II POOL#0080023 22-Jm-2001 6,951.18 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 014m-2001 0.00 IT 22-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,55439 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 22-Jm-2001 9,932.20 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 06101/9 01-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 22-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,914.98 GNMA 11 POOL 00080395 224m-2001 6,59114 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/011 01-1m-2001 0.00 IT 22-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 76,972.50 GNMA II POOL#080408X 22-Im-2001 53,070.33 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 014m-2001 0.00 IT 22-Jm-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 Ex .ffiv Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.., 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,500.34 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 22-Ian-2001 11,666.67 3837H3C70 7.000%12/20/2022 01-Ian-2001 0.00 IT i 22-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-Jan-2001 4,581.11 3695914NP8 01/23/2001 23-Ian-2001 0.00 IT 23-Jan-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24-Jan-2001 138,237.67 682680AJ2 FLTG RT 04242002 DO 04/24/ 24-Ian-2001 0.00 IT 24-Ian-200I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 GMAC DISC 24-Jan-2001 2,368.99 37042DNQ2 0124/2001 24-Jan-2001 0.00 IT 24-Jan-2001 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 24-Jan-2001 8,237.50 07588RNQ4 0124/2001 244an-2001 0.00 IT 24-Ian-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 F14LMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Jan-2001 10,933.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/252018 25-Dec-2000 0.00 IT 25-Jan-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,951.52 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP F14A#95 25-Jan-2001 9,065.32 398100AE4 7.4300/.06/012003 DO 022910 01-Jao-2001 0.00 IT 25-Ian-2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8:31:43 &ecutive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ - AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPPION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAUMUM LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 29-Jan-2001 35,433.13 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DO 04/28/ 28-Im-2001 0.00 IT 29-Jm-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN NTR 00246 29-Jm-2001 53,225.52 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04nRaD03 DD 0427/ 28-Im-2001 0.00 IT 29-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN NTR 00311 294m-2001 29,581.00 61745ENY3 FLTG RT 01/28/2002 DO 0127/ 28-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 29-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 30-JmQ001 52.670.00 209IIICUS FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 0620/ 15-Sep-2000 O.OD IT 30-Jm-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 314m-2001 -39.53 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 314m-2001 0.00 CW 31-Im-2001 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000,00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 31-Jm-2001 10,366.00 07588RNX9 01/31/2001 31-Jm-2001 0.00 IT 31-Jm-2001 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000-00 DALYR,ERCHRYSLER DISC 314m-2001 :2,407.75 2338EONXO 01/312001 314m-2001 0.00 IT 314m-2001 0.00 13_Feb-2001 8:31:43 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: sl PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-JAN-2001 -31-JAN-2001 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,240,000.00 NIKE INC DISC 31-Im-2001 31,687.20 6541D2NX2 01/31/2001 31-Jm-2001 0.00 IT i 31-3em2001 0.00 13-Feb-2001 8.31:43 Executive Workbench FAHRCOMMITTEE MeetlGgoae To,=Dlr. GI/(Al OYmloI AGENDA REPORT 1Oen1N MW I RMN1inht FAHROI-04 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE THE MID-YEAR REPORT FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 2000. SUMMARY Attached, in a separately bound document, is the District's Mid-Year Report for the period ended December 31, 2000. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District at the mid-point of fiscal year2000-01. Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 2000-01 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 51.46 percent, or $23,672,000 of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of$46.0 million has been expended. Net costs have increased 10.29 percent in comparison with the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1999 is $523.74 based on flows of 45.2 billion gallons, or 245.64 million gallons per day. This is $9.34, or 1.82 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. Capital improvement outlays for the first half of the year were 38.06 percent of budget, or$31,789,680. G:M9.ChY,w,WW wE Agw Repv =lG MAp Rep QXIN tiles M1K R . 1� Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ATTACHMENTS 1. District's Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ended December 31, 2000. G1w ftllgerdMBoaN Ipntle Repwh IQ MAgen.Regarbgl Il 14(E,,. R�. 1 s Page FAHR COMMITTEE NM q Date To W.of 01r. 02/14/01 2125101 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item NumW FAHMi_os 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2000 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) OM9.tlh� WAge R^N, Ml 8mN Age R@M WWi1 14(.).tl¢ Rw..e. v Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of September 30, 2000 and December 31, 2000. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period October 1 through December 31, 2000. Parffolio Performance summary Quarter Endel December 31,2000 Liquid Operating Monies Long-Tam Operating Monies(%) Total Rate Total Rate of of Return Berchmarkm Return Berlchmarlfo 3 MoMla: 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.1 6 Monlhe 3.5 3.1 5.7 5.7 9 Months 5.2 46 7.7 7.5 12 Monhs 6.6 6.0 94 6.9 Same inception 3o Sept.95 5.7 5.3 6.7 6.4 Market Value per PIMCO 31 Dec 00 $UsM $363.4 Average Quality •AAA 'AW Current Yield(%) 6.4 6.4 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 6.1 6.2 Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) so.oM 60.W Estimated Annual Income f2.2M 222.5M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Tenn Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt. 15 Year Bond Index Market Recap Treasuries rallied in the fourth quarter capping a strong year of double-digit returns that far outpaced returns from riskier investments such as corporate bonds and stocks. Yields fell as much as 88 basis points during the quarter amid Gear signs of slower growth and conviction that the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates. For the year, yields plunged as much as 137 basis points, with the sharpest declines coming in the middle of the yield curve, which was relatively flat when the year began. Treasuries outpaced most credit-sensitive fixed income sectors for the quarter and the full year. The following is a comparison of sector returns: G 1rq.aalaaerWamN/es,da Riioft l Board Aaerda eepo, %dial en 14(•I.mc Rs. fel Page 2 • Corporates lagged well behind Treasuries for the quarter and the year, weighted t down by rising defaults and concern that profits and cash Flow will erode further as the economy slows. The non-investment grade sector provided negative absolute returns, enduring its most difficult period since the recession of 1990. • Mortgages fared better than corporates, posting duration-adjusted returns dose to Treasuries for the quarter and the year. Mortgages' strong credit quality and relatively high yields offset heightened market volatility. • Emerging market bonds trailed Treasuries for the quarter as risk aversion grew amid prospects for slower global growth. The sector outperformed for the year, however, buoyed by improved fundamentals in many economics and strong returns from lower-rated credits such as Russia. Between June 1999 and May 2000, the Fed raised rates six times to cool the economy, based on the assumption that inflation posed the greatest risk to sustainable growth. While the Fed left rates unchanged during the second half of the year, at its December meeting the central bank shifted emphasis away from inflation. Setting the stage for an easing cycle, the Fed stated "risks are weighted mainly toward conditions that may generate economic weakness in the foreseeable future. Evidence supporting this view includes: • The government reported that the U.S. economy expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate in the third quarter, the weakest pace in four years and less than half the 5.6 percent rate in the second quarter. • Unemployment claims, among the first harbingers of a downturn, rose sharply; consumer confidence, which held near record highs for most of the year, began to fall. • Industrial production declined, while dozens of companies ranging from household goods to software to autos issued warnings that profits would slow. Performance results of the Long-Term Portfolio includes: • a 3.24 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 16 basis points; • near-benchmark duration was neutral for quarterly performance; • corporate holdings detracted from nominal returns as yield premiums widened due to heightened investor risk aversion, and an underweight corporate allocation compared to the benchmark significantly contributed to the portfolio performance; • a mortgage emphasis was slightly negative as the adverse impact of heightened market volatility offset relatively high yields; and • an asset-backed bonds helped returns as relatively high yields more than compensated for price declines. G RePmb\1101 Bm,d�pertiv Rgw,a`DN1Nem t,(•I.Gc RM . moss Page 3 Performance results of the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes: • a 1.79 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill Index by 22 basis points; • investment-grade corporate holdings detracted from performance as these issues were hurt by increased investor risk aversion; and • use of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes enhanced returns for the quarter and the year. PIMCO's Market Outlook Global growth will decelerate sharply as a U.S. slowdown spills over into other developed and emerging economies. The landing will be hardest in the U.S., where previously exuberant investment and consumer spending will slow substantially. Tentative recovery in Japan will evaporate in the face of reduced demand for Japanese exports from the rest of Asia and the U.S. Europe will land more softly, cushioned by more limited export ties to the U.S. and the absence of investment and consumption bubbles. The investment spending boom that fueled the rapidly growing New Economy has been self-justifying until recently. This virtuous circle is now reversing itself as reduced earnings growth and concern about high levels of corporate debt produced a dramatic re-pricing of risk in stock, corporate bond and bank loan markets in 2000. Heightened risk aversion among suppliers of capital, combined with lower profits and returns as the economy cools, point to a sharp slowdown in investment spending. The U.S. consumption binge will slow along with investment as confidence erodes further. Softer equity markets mean that customers can no longer count on capital gains to supplement disposable income. Slowing corporate profits translate into more insecurity about future income and employment. Stability in the housing sector will partially offset weaker investment and consumer spending. Lower mortgage rates will stimulate housing starts, boosting sectors of the economy related to housing, such as consumer durables. Protracted Fed easing is expected as the economy slows while Federal budget surpluses also provide room for fiscal stimulus. These effects, however, arrive with a lag over the next 12 to 18 months. Inflation in the U.S. and Euroland will decline over the next several quarters as oil prices move slower. Slower worldwide growth and the end of the cold winter weather will reduce price pressure in the oil market. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Term Portfolio includes: O My Me�npe,tl•WgN/p�de flepvbW01 BmM�paW RegebballWn N(e)C¢ nebee, enaea Page 4 • Target duration slightly above the benchmark to take advantage of higher yields on longer-maturity securities; • Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the yield curve. • Emphasize mortgages, where credit risk is minimal and attractive yield premiums provide a cushion against adverse price performance (increasing the portfolio's overall interest rate sensitivity, or duration is one way to offset heightened refinancing risk); • Hold upper tier, shortlntermediate corporate issues to take advantage of relatively high yields. • Continue to emphasize real return bonds, which will gain from higher inflation adjustments in the months ahead, and • Employ asset-backed securities as relatively high yielding alternatives to other short- term holdings. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes: • Target duration near the benchmark to limit interest rate risk; • Take advantage of relatively high yields on select upper-tier, short corporate issues, • Continue to invest in high quality commercial paper as a means to add value and liquidity to the portfolio. • Hold agency discount notes, which have a yield premium over Treasury bills. Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Lang-Tern, Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies($M) Mantes($M) 31 Dec.B9 19.0 262.9 31 Much 00 19.9 351.6 30 Jurro 00 33.3 356.2 30 S W 93.g 352.0 31 Deq.00 34.6 363.4 G 1rq.Eleyptle�B®rG/aenGa ReC+ha11J1 BmN sae aepnhY1101Vam 1Ne)6x kw . aaase Pape 5 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2) 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph G".BmYpmWlBwN I flap =lB-.�.Bgwp`O Van tyel4c R., a Page 6 Prepared by Finance, 2/7101, 2:09 PM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $400.000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 — $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 — $0 31 Dec 99 31 Mar 00 30 Jun 00 30 Sep 00 31 Dec 00 10 Liquid Operating Monies 0 Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excet.dta\fin\2220\gegg i\FinanceVnvestmgmtprog ram LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District Summary Information 09/30/2000 12/31/2000 e0 Quality ❑o)naaxu Total Market Value(MM) $352.0 $363.4 6t ■wn)2an 60 Quarterly Contributions(MM) 414.3 $0.0 50 4x Estimated Annual Income(MM) $22.2 $22.5 40 Estimated Duration(yrs)r 2.2 2.2 30 2421 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 1 6.9 % 6.2% d 20 °t Average Maturity(ym) 3.7 3.6 t0 ° 7 7 0 a n o Average Quali� AA+ __ AA+ 0 all on 00 NI1-1 Allow nrkrV M A IIM On It Aelnw ll n1m1 90 60 Sector' 000130,2000 60 Malurily atrrzirv2txw 70 ■12/.11RUOo ■unlatxn 60 52 49 50 45 43 50 240 40 30 a 20 30 zr. 22 20 1312 9 9 20 1° 11 12 Il 10 a o o a 1 2 10 4 4 2 2 GON 0, Corp Non USS Imwgl, Ulmer Net Cash 0 Develop Weems I9uly PI Hs 1.3M 3-5 yrs 510, tUdayrs 20'Hs Coupon 03L30L2000 W31—L2000 Derivalives - 0913012000 1WjL2000 > 12% 0 0 Gross Futures' 0.0 my" 0.0% 8.12% 4 4 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 7.8% 13 19 Mortgage Backed 0.0 0.0 6-7% 67 59 Other' 0.0 0.0 5-6% 5 6 <5% 1 12 AVera a Cau_pon_ _`___ 6.3 % 6.4% 1 Meatw Wabomlpmlollos(wa Wnd's)pike sensi0vlly to changes In hrlercq airs. nlsawelglnwl nramrlly Alxesenl value td all lxlntlpal mnl lnlrreN piynmrns. 2 loolwles quality raring of cash e9ndsalros backing luuwen4wward cannnOnmds. 3 Ulwx herintks Vankeaturo lmw mla, ,rvMlldnandlxelereed elock4'Net Cashrq INVIerx•nprals usb rrpdvalenlslrm anxnmt mwlm back lumres,fovmismlmlaVpnlu.nlrs. 4 Vtorlpvgolmacketl securwes are matmerbtxl Iry weighted average Ilte. 5 Includes all governmenl Wnrem zrxl turwlollar tnhxrs cwrtmch. Due to Ilre thrrc inwnh mattally d der Iwetlollar Imures mnlrarl%lime nondnul Value has III,dividlxl Iry loo. 6 seaalller dr4ennluert Iry Plmcu to ItzVr pntrntrally Ice,stable(Iumllo r cleracterlNlrs,such ae: 10 n N)$trips,SIIgxM.chc4 rmos.and hrvvsr I1.1en. 7 Category Include WCUri rrs whlCh thrive Ibelr value Iron,unxlerlying it me rate;such as crc III 9nemh,twain.,xi nwr-U.S.rktlVarivex PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIQUID OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District Summary_information 09/a02Y0D0 12/31/2000 80 Total Market Value(MM) E33.9 $34.5 70 Qualily' �iimvim�.rl Quarterly Contributions(MM) $0.0 Sox a SU s1 50 Estimated Annual Income(MM) $2.1 $2.2 5 40 Estimated Duration(yra)1 0.2 8.2 u 30 zz 21 2p n Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 6.7% 6.1 % ' 20 Average Maturity lyrs) 0.2 0.2 to 6 Avera eQuality AA+ AA+ p 3 0 0 4 0 o n o n n n -- AIRI W AA A ad. am HA n DOM AM g 160 120 140 Sector' �12�)IR0�00 Malurily ❑Ill/lUylOOn 120 100 ■Itz3utmlu de 100 100100 X, 80 at F 60 j v 60 n 40 e. 40 32 20 �0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 5 u 0 D O GOO mg Cogs Necuss insert" Other NO GSN 0-3mo 3-6rrm 69 nm 9�12mo IS Ps Sd yes Oevel" Markets M.mild, Coupon 0913DIDOD 12/3.1L2111111 Derivatives 09/3.0/20M 12n3L2000 > 12% 0 0 Gross Futures - 0.0 % 0.0% 8- 12% 11 6 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 7.8% 6 5 Mortgage Backed' 0.0 0.0 6-7% 61 56 Others 0.0 0.0 5-6% 1 32 <5% 21 1 Avera a Coupon 6.3% 6.4.% 1 Measure of a band ponfollo's no a hosnl'M twice wounivlly to clsoi es In hileresl dales. II Is a welglaed nialrnily al Present value of all inind9lml and intent Payn—ls. 2 lechdes,auty rating of cash equivalents nadh,hi, esdmward corcuouneon. 3(hiller Includes Yaninovio o hossf,convOublm A P,OOrOl Mocks;NO Cash/Money Make.includes f.bah,sl If,CP,0M and co,Less anmunt to hack hood lon.,fo—od,and unsmded uaM.c 4 Morip(nicked securities are caleµorizOl try weiglded averse,life. 5 seconnies uncounted by MMCO 10 have(anworall,less slahle dtrallon tluncternium such as 10 a PO Slri,sm,ork On.CMOs.and I..fl"co. 6 careen,Includes securities wnddd dOlO,their value Lwn rmderlying Imeress mini,such as crclll s,reads,swals and non-U.S.rkrivalives. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Prepared by Finance, 26/01, 2:25 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 7.00 6.75 8.50 6.25 6.00 5.75 W 5.50 5.25 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.25 4.00 — -30Jun-00 —a-2&Sep-00 -2g-Deo-00 G:\excel.dta\0n\2220\geggl\Flnance\HIstodcatTREASUR Vyieldcurve FAHR COMMITTEE r4eetingWe To ad.efDi` 2/14/01 2/28/01 AGENDA REPORT HamNumbrr IMMNUMW FAHkOl-W 14(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager SUBJECT: FIVE-YEAR STAFFING AND BUSINESS PLAN GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and approve the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan, fiscal year 2000-01 to 2004-05. SUMMARY In the spring of 2000, the Steering Committee requested the incoming General Manager develop a new Five-year Staffing and Business Plan to update and replace the preceding plan completed in May 1997. The new staffing plan incorporates several elements and has expanded in both scope and depth. The work of the Executive Management Team, division-heads, and many other District staff has resulted in the attached document. Please consult the Additional Information section for further details on the staffing plan development and approach. Note that both the OMTS and PDC Committees have been given the attached documentation and a presentation at their February meetings. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Project required several hundred hours of in-house District staff time. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Note the following text has been directly abstracted from the staffing plan's Executive Summary. The Five-year Staffing and Business Plan has a long history of development, revision and refinement. In 1996, the consulting firm, EMA, was hired by the District to conduct a review of our Operations & Maintenance Department. That review resulted in a report by EMA which stated that for the District to be competitive with private-sector GM EmWeN M�gppb='am A,..FaP'dNA1Vbm Mil_-tlec R. v Page t wastewater treatment operators, a staffing decrease of 15 percent was warranted in the � Operations & Maintenance Department. The Executive Management Team believed that remaining competitive was a high priority. At that time, the General Manager, with the Executive Management Team's (EMT) support, agreed that a reduction of 15 percent was not only viable in the Operations & Maintenance Department, but was appropriate for the entire agency. The General Manager set a staff reduction target of 15 percent by the end of fiscal year 2001-2002. This executive order was the catalyst for the initial Five-year Staffing Plan product. Upon setting this target, District staff spent several months developing a staffing plan. In May 1997, the District's first Five-year Staffing Plan was published and presented to the Board of Directors. The ultimate staff reduction target was actually greater than originally desired by the General Manager. Authorized personnel in FY 1996-97 was 616 and was projected to decline to 508 staff positions in FY 2001-02. This was a significant 18 percent decline in personnel. The Board of Directors adopted this staffing plan with the understanding that any plan is a forecast of the future and is subject to revision based on circumstances that could not be predicted or assumptions that were not entirely accurate. This Five-year Staffing Plan was an effective tool in guiding the District for the next few years. Indeed, based on several progressive staff reduction programs, the 18 percent target was achieved and exceeded early. At the beginning of FY 2000-01, approximately 504 full-time equivalents were employed—below both our authorized budgeted staffing level of 510 and the 508 staff target in FY 01-02. This was acknowledged as a significant achievement, but was not without some anxiety and costs. Numerous reductions occurred in the 0&M Department that did not coincide with new automation, thereby impacting backlogs, wrench time preventive maintenance and other re-engineering efforts. Declines in professional staff resulted in increased memo time (uncompensated overtime)for remaining personnel. And because of the rapid decline in staffing that was coincident with an internal investigation that resulted in several resignations/terminations, employee morale suffered. These were some of the costs of an effective, but aggressive, staff reduction program. In the spring of 2000, the incoming General Manager, as part of his commitment to the Board, agreed to conduct a new staffing plan. Like the first plan, the Executive Management Team supported the program and believed the timing was appropriate given the significant changes that had transpired since mid-1997. Unlike the first plan, it was agreed that a more thorough undertaking would be needed to develop a new product. To that end, a comprehensive program was initiated in the summer of 2000 to develop a new Five-year Staffing and Business Plan. This began with a review of the District's vision, mission, goals and objectives and how they had been impacted by changes in leadership, regulations, Board direction, community sentiment, and the like. Revisions were made to the District's vision and mission, and two major issues became apparent that would impact a revised staffing plan. The District was undertaking several new initiatives and becoming more involved in areas such as water reclamation and conservation. Secondly, the 1999 Strategic Plan outlined a significantly expanded Capital Improvement Program compared to prior years. These varied assumptions have been embedded, to one extent or another, into the new staffing plan. or..y.a.�o«enae.b w.�a•a.�anaw m.m nw,w aeowsman�um as a.ew: erxine Page 2 Upon recognizing these issues, the difficult work of preparing an accurate projection of staffing needs was undertaken. This included identification and development of over 60 business units in the District with discreet duties and responsibilities. Staffing projections were made at this business unit level, with staff time allocated to major functions and unique tasks to the one-tenth, and oftentimes one-hundredth, full-time equivalent positions. All of these tasks, functions, and business units, with the associated staff projections, were then consolidated at the division and department level. The Executive Management Team, at a three-day retreat, then reviewed the staffing data in detail. Based on the review at the retreat, the EMT requested District staff to re-examine some of the assumptions and resulting staff projections. This resulted in revisions to decrease the originally proposed staffing numbers. The EMT approved this revision and each department was tasked with writing a detailed chapter for the new plan. This information has been drafted and summarized and is the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan contained herein. It should be noted this plan is not designed for extremely aggressive growth nor based on overly conservative estimates. It is based on what is believed to be our most likely future given credible assumptions and predictions. In the following chapters, data is presented for each department that articulates the expected and planned staffing changes from fiscal year 2000-01 to fiscal year 2004-05. The information is more comprehensive than the prior five-year plan as it contains a significant amount of detail on the business operations of the departments, what is experienced now, and what is proposed or anticipated for the future. Thus, the new staffing plan has an important "business plan" component that was not an element in the 1997 plan. Many other refinements have been made, the least of which is a detailed plan that is three times the length of its predecessor. This is indicative of the level of effort placed in this product. Specific staffing details are contained in each chapter and are summarized below. For readers interested in actual staffing projections at the task and function level for the numerous business units, an appendix titled, "Five-year Staffing Plan Data, FY 01-05" is available under separate cover. In sum, staffing is projected to increase through FY 2002-03 then decline in FY 2003- 05. These changes are largely due to our planned Capital Improvement Program, and are also due to other initiatives described throughout this report. The table below shows the expected change in staffing patterns for the District for the upcoming five- year period. Table 1 District-wide Staffinq Changes, Next Five Years Regular 507.5 528 528.5 524.25M Intern 4.4 5.7 5.6 5.5 Limited Term 20.7 40.7 48.7 39.2 Tem ora 7 11.1 9 7.7 G 1rq.EhWp"rWWurJ IppMa fle,vbl]WI B-M A"a fl"ry b'OID1Ylen 14M a..ma: a�ee Page 3 Contained at the end of this report is a glossary describing, among other terms, each position type. In brief, significant increases are noted in the limited-term employee classification—those employees that have a contract for specific services and who will be released upon completion of those services. The increase in limited-term employees is, for the most part, driven by our rapidly increasing Capital Improvement Program (CIP). These positions will be budgeted and expensed in our Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget. The CIP implementation of the $1.5 billion in new projects identified in the 20-year Strategic Plan will increase the projected annual engineering capital expenditures from $61 million in FY 2001 to over$110 million each year through FY 2005. This temporary increase in capital project work over the next five years will require limited-term engineering staff to accomplish the planned work. If the work is not conducted, the limited-term positions will not be hired. In addition to the limited-term employees, regular employee numbers show an increase and then a decline through the five-year planning period. The table below shows the change in staffing levels, by department, from the end of FY 2000-01 to FY 2001-02. Table 2 Staffing FY 2001 vs. Staffing FY 2002 jl� iDepartment fFY004, '.: . 91.E General Managers Office' 12.5 14.5 Finance Department 35.5 38.5 Human Resources and Employee 10.75 10.75 Development Department Technical Services Department 92.5 94.5 Engineering Department 72.75 73.75 Operations& Maintenance Department 250.5 256.5 Information Technology Department 33 39.5 TOTAL: 1 507.5 1 528 9no aas Communkeaow eM AEminWmWe Sery The department chapters contained within the report detail the listed staffing increases and also projected declines as the staffing plan moves forward. However, the types of positions recommended for hire over the next year will provide an overview of how new staff should be assigned. These are shown as follows: e 1 Certified Records Management Professional (GM's Office) 1 Public Information Assistant (GM's Office) 1 Assistant to the Engineering Contracts Administrator(Finance) 2 Storekeepers (Finance) e 1 Environmental Specialist (Technical Services) e 1 Regulatory Specialist (Technical Services) e 1 Instrumentation Engineer (Engineering) e 4 Collections Technicians (Operations & Maintenance) e 1 Engineer (Operations & Maintenance) e 1 Senior Engineer (Operations & Maintenance) e 1 Entry-level Technician (Information Technology) e 2 Project Specialists (Information Technology) e 2 Programmer Analysts (Information Technology) GM Em�W^,W1 MW RK =l�N.1 R�`Y I0 14e1'Oz RehW vase Page . 1 Senior Project Specialist (Information Technology) . .5 Technician (Information Technology) In conclusion, the proposed Five-year Staffing and Business Plan contains a significant level of analyses and is predicated on the changing and ever-increasing role the District plays in environmental stewardship. Despite the increases recommended, the highest regular staffing level proposed in FY 2002-03 remains close to 14 percent below our authorized staffing in FY 1996-97. Although many limited-term contractual employees will be required to complete the robust CIP, these positions will be eliminated upon completion of these projects. With this new staffing plan, it is believed the spirit of the original five-year plan, with its goal of significant staff decreases, has been maintained, while ensuring sufficient staff are hired, as needed, to effectively continue our expanded mission, goals and objectives. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives suggested. ATTACHMENTS Five-year Staffing and Business Plan eN.y.JmWpeNv M�FWD =lPa AWe RnW're•OAN 14(14 RM arivaa Page 5 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT January 29, 2001, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on January 29, 2001. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Guy Carrozzo, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Kellene Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille Peer Swan Denis Bilodeau - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Others: Others: John Collins— City of Fountain Valley Blake Anderson Debra Burris Michelle Tuchman— NCG Porter Novelli Bob Ghirelli Steve Conklin Richard Bell, Greg Heiertz - IRWD Jim Herberg Andrew Czorny Thom Coughran—Santa Ana Lisa Lawson Tom Dawes John Carlson — Fullerton David Ludwin Shivaji Deshmukh Eldon Davidson — Newport Beach Bob Ooten Jill Everhart Don Calkins, George Martin -Anaheim Wendy Sevenandt Cindy Gehman Ron Linsky - NWRI Gary Streed Jenny Glasser Doug Auslander— Salomon Smith Barney Lisa Tomko Clark Ida Greg Blonde, Doug Brawn—Stradling Yocca John Kennedy Terry Lane—Garden Grove William R. Mills Jr. Dennis Kasper—Parsons Corporation Mehul Patel Jan Debay Jennifer Phillips Bud Quist Ron Wildermuth Steve Tedesco —ASL Consulting Group 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held January 8, 2001 were approved as mailed. GWR System Minutes January 29,2001 Page 2 of 5 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Financial Studv Mr. Dawes distributed the Financial Study completed by Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG). PRAG reviewed the results at the January 8, 2001 JCC meeting. The report was distributed to Committee members present and others requesting a copy. Mr. Don Calkins, City of Anaheim and vice chair of the groundwater producers, submitted a letter to the Committee requesting that the PRAG Financial Study be received by the Committee in draft form until the producers have an opportunity to review and comment on the study. After discussion, a special Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) meeting to consider financial issues was scheduled for Thursday, March 1 at 3:00 p.m. The regular JCC meeting scheduled for Monday, February 26 was moved to Thursday, February 22 at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Dawes extended an invitation to the producers to speak at the February 22 meeting. Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried, the PRAG Financial Study report was received, but is to be remain open until comments have been received and reviewed. Staff is directed to bring back a status report on comments received on the Financial Study at the March 1 meeting. 3. City of Anaheim Request for Forebav Landscaping and Water Well Purchase Mr. Dawes reported that the Agenda Item Submittal mailed had a minor change. A Revised Agenda Item Submittal was distributed, which eliminated the word, "appraised", in the last sentence, first paragraph under Discussion/Analysis. He reported that the City of Anaheim has requested the Groundwater Replenishment System incorporate into the project (1) landscaping in the forebay area, and (2) purchase of two older Anaheim wells close to Kraemer Basin. He noted that if the Committee agrees in concept to executing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and if the project is not approved, the MOU would not go forward. If the project is approved, the MOU would alleviate some of Anaheim's concerns about the project. The two Anaheim wells are upgradient from the project and will not receive any project water for at least one-year, which is a DHS requirement. The two wells could be used for monitoring groundwater. GWR System Minutes January 29,2001 Page 3 of 5 Mr. Dawes reported that the City of Anaheim would like the percolation basins in Anaheim to be landscaped. He recommended that landscaping and improvements be allowed in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000. Anaheim will prepare the plans and construction for the work with approval of OCWD. Mr. Dawes recommended a Statement of Intent be adopted by the Committee to enter into an MOU with the City of Anaheim should the project go forward. Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony, and carried, authorizing a Statement of Intent to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Anaheim to (1) purchase two wells; and (2) landscaping of the percolation basin area. 4. Discussion of Governance Issues Mr. Dawes reported on interim governance issues that would require the Committee to have extra authority. The Committee can now authorize contracts up to $100,000 provided that the money is budgeted and two votes from each agency are obtained. He recommended that authority be given to the Committee upon approval by the Joint Boards on March 28 as part of the approval process to: 1. Have the ability to authorize contracts up to a new, higher amount provided that both OCWD and OCSD approved budget include the funds and two Committee members from each agency; 2. Approve change orders; 3. Accept contracts as complete; 4. Accepting easements; 5. Approve numerous consulting services contracts and miscellaneous contracts. After lengthy discussion, the Committee requested staff to return to the February 22 meeting with recommendations. Director Swan suggested that the Boards (or appropriate Committees) receive prior budget briefings. Final approval of these changes will be made by the Committee prior to the full Board on March 28, 2001. 5. Participation in Evaluation of Pulsed Black-Body Ultraviolet Technology Mr. Dawes reported that National Water Research Institute (NWRI) has requested that the GWR System participate in research and evaluation of a pulsed black-body ultraviolet technology project. He reported that NWRI would be contributing 50% and Moulton Niguel Water District 25%, with a total project cost of$92,600. GWR System Minutes January 29,2001 Page 4 of 5 Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Anthony, and carried, authorizing Orange County Water District general manager to execute a purchase order to support the National Water Research Institute Pulsed Black-Body Ultraviolet Technology research project in and amount not to exceed $23,150. 6. Purchase of Reverse Osmosis Membranes Mr. Dawes requested that new RO membrane elements be purchased to replace current Demonstration Plant membranes that are four years old. New technology has made new membranes last longer and be more economical. Mr. Mehul Patel reported that B4 elements would be purchased at a cost of$400 to $600 each. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Anthony, and carried, authorizing the Orange County Water District general manager to execute a purchase order, in an amount not to exceed $60,000, for purchase of reverse osmosis membrane elements for the existing demonstration facility. 7. Status Report Mr. Dawes gave an update on permits and grant status. He reported that staff is working on an application for a $50 million grant from the Department of Water Resources (DWR). He reported that the grant is for conjunctive use of the groundwater basin and that on February 7, the OCWD Board will be asked to grant Mr. Bill Mills authority to apply for the DWR Grant through a resolution. Mr. Dawes reported that staff has done an energy analysis of kilowatt per acre-foot comparison between Colorado River water, State Project Water, and the GWR System. He reported that producing water with GWR System is much more energy efficient than importing water from either the Colorado River or Northern California. Director Eckenrode commented that we have to keep in mind that industrial and municipal users would want future connections and outlets should be provided in the pipeline. There were no comments from general managers or the public. GWR System Minutes January 29, 2001 Page 5 of 5 ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for February 22, 2001 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. LAW OFFICES OF `d WOODRUFF, SPRADLIR & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CONVORAiION MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: February 21, 2001 RE: Litigation Status Report 1. Norman Parsons v. OCSD 2. Alfonso Garland v. OCSD I am pleased to report to you substantial and significant success on behalf of the District in each of the above cases as more particularly set forth below. Both of these . cases are Human Resources/Personnel issues of considerable importance to the District and it appears that we are close to a total resolution on the basis of court judgments in favor of the District. 1. Parsons v. OCSD This is an action filed by a former employee who served as a Senior Laboratory Analyst for many years with the District and as such, he was a member of the Technical Services Bargaining Unit and covered under the provisions of a "MOU" between the District and the OCEA for the Technical Services Unit. That MOU together with the District's adopted Personnel Rules had a provision that employees are entitled to a maximum of six months leave, whether paid or unpaid, in any 24-month period. Any employee who fails to return after the expiration of an approved leave of absence is deemed to have automatically resigned from his/her position. In July 1997, Mr. Parsons injured his knee in a non work-related injury and look a five month leave of absence. In May 1998, Mr. Parsons took an additional leave of absence because of an intestinal ailment requiring surgery. Mr. Parsons requested several months leave of absence but the District only granted two (2) months, and subsequently extended one additional month which thus placed him at a total of eight months and, therefore, in non-compliance of the Rules and the MOU. The District's Human Resources Department had several meetings and conversations with Mr. Parsons and upon his failure to return to work, he was advised that his employment was terminated, although the District subsequently offered to employ him on a contract basis since there was no available position open for him to return to work as a regular employee. Mr. Parsons filed a Petition in the Superior Court seeking a Writ of Mandate ordering the District to return him to work, in July of 1999. The District was represented Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District February 21, 2001 Page 2 by this office and on May 2000, the District obtained a Judgment in its favor which denied the Writ in all respects, and awarded nothing to Mr. Parsons. Mr. Parsons has filed a Notice of Appeal to that Judgment. In the interim, Mr. Parsons also filed a new suit in the Superior Court alleging basically the identical facts but trying to create a new theory of liability on behalf of the District. This office again represented the District and filed motions in the Superior Court for a summary judgment asserting that Mr. Parsons already had his proverbial "day in court." The court in that case has also agreed with the District in all respects, and has denied the petition and awarded judgment to the District. The only remaining issue is a resolution of the appeal which we feel quite confident that the controlling law in the State of California absolutely supports the District's position relative to automatic termination upon refusal to return to work. The case has not been scheduled for oral argument and the final ruling of the court is not likely to occur for approximately 18 months. The matter has been briefed and is simply awaiting action by the court. 2. Alfonso Garland v. OCSD This is an action filed by a present District employee in the United States District Court naming the District and Blake Anderson, an Assistant General Manager, as defendants. The action alleges a number of causes of action, including breach of contract, violation of civil rights, violation of constitutional rights and discrimination purportedly based upon his color. Mr. Garland is employed presently as a Senior Mechanic following a promotion in 1997 from his entry level as a mechanic. In 1998, the District announced that it was going to recruit for a new position of"lead mechanic." Mr. Garland, along with several others, applied for this new position. Subsequently, however, with the reorganization of the District and the limitation on new positions, the District terminated the recruitment and hired no one to fill that position. Mr. Garland has alleged that he was wrongfully discriminated against because of his color, and filed the present action in the Superior Court after he had filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charging violation of both State and Federal law. On August 6, 2000, EEOC advised Mr. Garland that his allegations were not substantiated and that there was no connection between his race and the District's decision to cease the recruitment process and, therefore, closed their file without further action. This afforded Mr. Garland the opportunity to file suit which he has subsequently done. On February 9, 2001, in furtherance of the District's motion filed by this office as counsel to the District, the court substantially eliminated most of Mr. Garland's complaint. First, the court has dismissed every cause of action against Mr. Anderson for a variety of the legal arguments and reasons that we propounded. Secondly, the court has dismissed most of the causes of action against the District on the same basis. The court has allowed Mr. Garland 30 days in which to attempt to plead sufficient facts .klon\StatM Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District February 21, 2001 Page 3 to state a cause of action for civil rights violations or constitutional violations. We do not believe that he will be able to allege sufficient facts under penalty of perjury that would be sufficient to sustain a cause of action. If an amended complaint is filed, we will evaluate it and, in all likelihood, file a second motion for summary judgment in favor of the District. THOMAS L WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:d MID - YEAR FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT is LIU! (4, i78.89 88F66— • 196,921.79 21,287.24 56.713.47 59,037 ^ 10.553.47- _114 • 2,010,432.11 217,327.71 579,004.44 502.727-sL wE 764.38 116,81 • -'256,403.79 27,717.25 73,844179 5,86, 85 3 9 .45 4,21 - .00 Q24,432,70) _ ,34 .76 -- 164 94 -23`. .,i.4i t8,6i • .00 4,1 a.8 i2 W 66, (2,044.Yv) (3,067.491 1' • 4, 29a59 is35 + r4n ±sq jy " 946.89 8,652 1� 9,2' • 24?�4 (21,440 31) -423,0i • "' 94,916 11) 1316,7i • • .AL _82 v n 19 __ 481,7` • T.'AL 25; 6 15,287.50 77 6 47 1,475,71 01 • iN-4 - 25.400x ` 7` • • • \V ♦HII�! 4 � 4 Orange County Sanitation District, California +IHO IXF EMV\ Table of Contents r Section1 -Overview..........................................................................................:........................1 r Financial Report- ,� Section 2- Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department......................:...........................................1 r Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3 r Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5 r, Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8 r Chart of Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9 Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Review r Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life........................6 r Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas....................................................................1 "0 Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2 RevenueArea No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3 �. Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4 Section 5- Self Insurance Budget Review General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2 Operational Report r Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plane.................................................................1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report L i i u This Page Left Intentionally Blank i ; N 1.a L+ L W iJ Overview Mid-Year Financial & Operational Report December 31, 2000 The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2000-01 mid-year comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 2000-01 performance objectives as established in the 2000-01 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review., At December 31, 2000, 51.46 percent, or$23,672,000 of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of $46.0 million has been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 10.29 percent, or$2,208,000 from the same period last year. There are two main reasons for this increase in net costs: 1) During the second quarter of fiscal year 2000-01, a large retroactive adjustment was made to the amount charged to SAWPA in the prior year which resulted in a $685,000 reduction of prior year revenue being recognized as a reduction to current year revenue. Additionally, the current year charges to SAWPA of$485,100 are significantly lower than anticipated at 26.04 percent of the $1,862,650 budget. The prior years over-estimated accruals and the current years shortage are due to the decrease in the strength (B.O.D. and T.S.S.) of the discharge flow from SAWPA. 2) As further explained below, the costs of chemicals used for odor control and the cost of natural gas have risen significantly over the prior year. The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 2000 is$523.74 based on flows of 45.2 billion gallons, or 245.64 million gallons per day. This is $9.34, or 1.82 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$514.40. This overage is due to net expenses being 2.92 percent or$672,000 higher than the budget through December 31, 2000. This is offset slightly by flows being 0.26 percent higher than the budgeted amount of 245 million gallons per day. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 2000 include: • Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 49.05 percent of budget through mid-year, and staffing was 11 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 2.16 percent below the total 510 FTE's approved in the 2000-01 budget. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year- end. • Memberships— Membership expense totaled $149,300, or 80.49 percent of budget, as of December 31 because a majority of the District's memberships are due in the first half of each year. Section 1 - Page 1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report l ; • Notices& Ads- Expenses for notices and ads were at 107.58 percent, or$32,918, of the 2000-01 budget of$30,600 due to the unexpected number of vacant positions that required advertising. • Odor Control-Odor control costs through December 31 are at 84.23 percent of the $997,800 budget due to the cost for chemicals being much higher than was anticipated when the budget was prepared. " • Gasoline. Diesel & Oil-At mid-year, costs for these fuels are at 117.12 percent of u the $187,300 budget. Neither the compressed natural gas (CNG) purchases, totaling $106,900 through December 31, 2000, nor the more than offsetting CNG - sales of$145,000 were budgeted for 2000-01. .r • Other Waste Disposal-Through December 31, other waste disposal costs are only al 18.27 percent of the $467,100 budget. This shortfall is primarily due to the timing of when services are provided. Staff expects these costs to approximate budget by year-end. - • Professional Services-Audit& Accounting- Mid-year expenses of$42,600 are at 93.63 percent of the$45,500 budget due to the timing of the District's annual j financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year. I • Professional Services-Other- Mid-year expenses of$348,900 are only at 25.61 percent of the $1,362,500 budget due to some of the budgeted projects occurring in the last part of the year. Consulting projects related to the compensation and _ classification study and the District's biosolids management program have not incurred significant costs as of December 31. • Service Maintenance Agreements-As of December 31, costs related to service maintenance agreements are only at 29.70 percent of the $1,383,450 budget due to 6W the timing of when many of the agreements are renewed. Staff expects to _ approximate budget by year-end. r • Natural Gas-As of December 31, natural gas expense totaled $1,278,900, or 113.18 percent of budget primarily due to a large increase in the cost per unit of Li usage since the budget was adopted, as well as choosing to use natural gas in place of electricity as those prices were skyrocketing. • Other Non-Operating Expense- Due to the timing of a variety of miscellaneous y expenses, other non-operating expenses are at 77.01 percent of the$44,250 - budget. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-end. Li li 4i Section 1 - Page 2 Overview Comparison of Mid-Year Cost per Million Gallon Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years 5w- 51, _ srne slam 0 75 ,e,96 Mar 50tl- I a68'6a 485.75 mevr 4w- 40d- 30 ee.s7 9i:9@ Bfl99 8@9V gkla and Year 9M Year and Yen an Annual OV en0 Qlr and car em at, entl Ov Budget As demonstrated in the graph above, the cost per million gallons at mid-year has been within 3.50 percent of year-end totals for three out of the last four years. The 2000-01 mid-year cost per million gallons is higher than compared to the annual budget primarily due to net joint operating costs being $672,000 or 2.92 percent higher than budget, as previously discussed. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through mid-year of 2000-01, as budgeted for 2000-01, and as actually incurred through mid-year of 1999-00. All three charts are quite similar showing little change among the current year mid-year actual, current year budget, and prior year mid-year actual. More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through mid-year for the last five years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for December 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000; Section 2— Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through December 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2— Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through December 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2—pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through December 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through December 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2— Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Section 1 - Page 3 2000-01 Mid-Year Report se Capital Outlay Review., $0,000,000 r $8010001000 $70,000,000 $601000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000.000 r $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 j $0 12/31/00 Actual Projected 2000-01 Originally Estimated Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 2000-01 Capital $31,789,600 $57,671.600 Outlay. $83,629,000 w As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $31,789,680 or 38.06 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 2000-01 as of December 31, 2000. Costs are proportionately low through mid-year as many projects are still in the ^' design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are expected to be $57,871,600 million, or 69.28 percent of budget at year-end. Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay requirements incurred through December 31. For more detailed information, Section 3 — Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 6 through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At December 31, 2000, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $68.57 million, or 45.31 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at $34.50 million, are at 44.04 percent of budget, or $15.20 million, and Other (User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, budgeted at $74.26 million, is at 37.67 percent of budget, or$27.97 ` million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through mid-year because most of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the second half of the fiscal year. No sale of capacity rights, budgeted at$6.34 million, have been received because these revenues are not due to the District until April of r 2001. r Section 1 - Page 4 IN Overview w Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at$4.82 million, are at 69.39 percent, or$3.46 million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Interest revenue, budgeted at $31.41 million, is at$22.06 million, or 70.22 percent of budget. �+ This is due to both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than were anticipated in the 2000-01 budget. m° Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $83.60 million, or 46.49 percent of budget through December 31, 2000. The costs incurred related to capital improvement projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are proportionately low through mid-year at$31.79 million or 38.06 percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. p Conversely, COP retirement and interest expense, budgeted at $40.74 million, are high at 56.65 percent of budget, or$23.67 million, because the majority of the principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of the year. r Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $910,400 or 39.05 percent of budget at December 31, while total expenses were $1,351,200 or 57.96 percent of budget. Operational Review. The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of December 31, 2000. !, Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and incorporated into the 2000-01 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 2000-01, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level. At December 31, 2000, 80 percent of the District's performance objectives and 65 percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. Section 1 - Page 5 2000-01 Mid-Year Report I. v L v w u This Page Left Intentionally Blank i �i i W+ � I V L u Sedon 1 - Pape 9 bJ J.O. & W. C. Budget Review r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Engineering O 8 M 9v° 58% r Finance 5% Comm.1% Into.Tech. 6% r Exec.Mgmt. TB S.- - WR 2% Departmental Gallonage Charges 2000-01 Budget Engineering 10% 08M 55% Finance 6% Comm. 1% Info.Tech. Exe .Mgmt Tech.Svcs. 1]% WR 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Six Months Ended December 31. 1999 Engineering 1a) 86% Finance 6% Comm.1% Info.Tech 6% Exec.Mg 2°5 Tect,.5.cs 16 WR 2°% Section 2— Page 1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report G Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 200041 U 12/31/98 12131/99 Annual 12/31/00 Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow In Million Gallons 45,179.19 43,932.00 89.425,00 45,198.00 0.4 Flow In Million Gallons per Day 245.54 238.76 245.00 245.64 General Manager's Department $ 13.98 $ 16.62 $ 18.23 $ 13.58 Communications 9.34 8.75 10.09 9.00 Human Resources Department 11.81 15.84 18.07 13.40 Finance Department Finance Administration 16.76 16.66 18.95 16.24 i•l Accounting 17.71 16.13 14.84 1429 Purchasing&Warehousing 10.92 10.53 13.85 11.52 Total 45.38 43.32 47.64 42.05 Information Technology Department I.T.Administration 3.63 9.41 11.43 10.26 Customer&NeMmrk Support 16.96 19.23 21.63 17.28 1 Programing&Database 4.97 5.80 12.67 11.57 u Process Ctrl Integration 9.05 8.83 11.44 10.65 Total 34.61 43.27 57.17 49.76 ; Operations&Maintenance Department ILI! Dian&Mainl. Administration 9.13 11.06 4.75 6.74 O&M Process Engineering 8.19 12.50 12.08 11.99 Plant No.l Operations 71.33 73.67 77.45 76.87 Plant No.2 Operations 95.82 100.22 100.52 113.11 Mechanical Maintenance 51.52 51.25 68.42 51.29 Electrical&Instrumentation Maintenance 58.32 64.01 72.34 81.92 Central Generation 26.78 31.82 28.26 45.25 L Air Quality&Special Projects 10.90 13.04 13.14 12.54 Collection Facilities Maintenance 21.25 24.90 16.45 15.85 Plant Facilities Maintenance 43A1 45.12 45.11 41.55 j 1 Total 398.65 427.58 428.52 437.11 IV1 Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 8.64 6.67 7.44 7.26 Ernironmental Compliance&Monitoring 29.63 43.89 40.34 41.25 Environmental Sciences Laboratory 31.67 42.27 40.36 38.79 ✓J Source Control 27.11 30.26 31.86 31.99 Safety&Emergency Response 6.50 9.58 11.06 11.82 Total 103.55 132.67 131.06 131.11 Engineering Department Engineering Administration 3.44 3.50 5.18 5.52 Planning&Design 24.93 29.71 32.30 30.51 Construction Management - 33.92 35.41 38.97 34.84 Total 62.29 68.72 76.45 70.87 Total Joint Operating Expenses 777.61 755.77 787.23 766.88 Less: Coal Allocation (187.46) (204,85) (222.81) (209.41)Net Joint Operating Requirements 490.16 551.92 664.62 557.47 L Less:Revenues (41.45) 63,35) (50.22) (33.73) Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 448.71 $ 488.57 $ $14.40 $ 523.74 L Section 2-Page 2 L•' J.O. & W. C. Budget Review s Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Six Months Ended December 31, r 2000-01 12/31/98 12/31199 Yearto Date Budge% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 12/31100 Realized r General Managers Department $ 631,564 $ 730,170 $ 1,629,950 $ 613,844 37.66% Communications 42109 384,213 902,700 406,639 45.05% Human Resources Department 53&737 695.914 1,615,580 605,593 37.48% Finance Department Finance Administration 756,927 731,746 1,694,850 734,128 43.32% Accounting 800,272 708,484 1.327.350 645.892 48.66% Purchasing&Warehousing 493,300 462,687 1,238,800 52&700 42.03% Total 2.050,499 1,902,917 4,261,000 1,900,720 44.61% Information Technology Department Information Technology Administration 163,923 413.433 1,022,300 463,622 45.35% •+ Customer&Network Support 766,280 844,916 1,934,600 781,213 40.38% Programing&Database 224,338 254,627 1,133,000 522,935 46.15% Process Chi Integration 408,932 387,808 1,023.070 481.455 47.06% wv Total 1,563,473 1,90D,784 5,112,g70 2.249.225 43.99% Operations&Maintenance Department Opns&Maint. Administration 412,426 486,615 424,500 304,701 71.78% O&M Process Engineering 369,808 549,303 1,080,100 541,808 50.16% r Plant No.1 Operations 3,222,618 3.236,686 6,925.600 3,474.224 50.16% Plant No.2 Operations 4,328,478 4,402.351 8.988.400 5,112,395 56.88% Mechanical Maintenance 2,327,438 2261.493 5,224,000 2,318,415 44.38% ,. Electrical&Instrumentation Mtce. 2,634.902 2,812,260 6,469,350 2.798,697 43.26% Central Generation 1,209,994 1,398,057 2,526.900 2,045,016 80.93% Air Quality&Special Protects 492,665 572.769 1,174,600 566,908 48.26% Collection Facilities Maintenance 960,195 1,093,741 1,470,950 716,430 48.71% Plant Facilities Maintenance 1,961,330 1,982,213 4,034,000 1,878,013 46.55% Total 17.919,854 18,784,488 38,318,400 19,756,607 51.56% Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 390,546 292,813 665,600 327.933 4927% Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 1,338,490 1,928,387 3,607,000 1,864.665 51.69% Envionmental Sciences Laboratory 1,430,850 1,856,809 3,609,150 1,753,453 4&58r/o ,�. Source Control 1,224,854 1.329.541 2,849,250 1,445,721 50.74% Safety&Emergency Response 293,780 420,827 988,650 534.378 54.05% Total 4,678,520 5.828.377 11,719.650 5,926,050 50.57% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 155,513 158,281 463,600 249.292 53.77% Planning&Design 1,126,16E 1,305,217 2,888,3D0 1,378" 47.74% Construction Management 1,532.618 1.555,564 3,485,100 1,574.657 45.18% Total 2.814,299 3.019,062 6.837.000 3,202,753 46.84% Total Joint Operating Expenses 30,613,935 33,245,925 70.397,250 34.661,431 49.24% Less: Cast Allocation (8,468,959) (8.999,296) (19,906,6D0) (9,464,780) 47.55% r Net Joint Operating Requirements 22,144,976 24,246,629 50,490,650 25,196,651 49.90% Less:Revenues (1,872,625) (2,782,924) (4,490,650) (1,524.578) 33.95% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 20,272,351 $ 21.463.705 S 46,000,0Dg $ 23,672,073 51.46% r �r Section 2-Page 3 rr 2000-01 Mid-Year Report yr Summary of Expenses by Major Category For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 i Experare Expense tricreass Increase Percent W Budget Tluu Thm (Decrease) (Decrease) BhWget Renaming Description 2000-01 12131MG 1201a19 $ % Realized Budget $awry,Wages 8Bena81a $ 41,287,700 $ 20,252,428 $ 19,771,382 $ 481,046 2.43% 49.05% $ 21,035272 AdmlrlSbVive EVorwaa 753,000 410.825 354,016 56,809 16.05% 54.58% 342,175 Printing&PubliraDert 352.300 182,429 158,216 24,213 15.30% 51.78% 169,871 Training&MaaBngs 901,850 377.766 386,215 (Q449) -2.19% 41.89% 524,084 W operating Expensas 4,712.980 3.045,295 2.459.339 535,957 23.83% 64.62% 1,667.664 _ Contractual Services 7,239,200 3,461,108 3,292,939 168,169 5.11% 47.81% 3,778,092 y Profesaional Services 2,105,50D 726.551 943.836 (217.285) -23.02% 34.51% 1,378,949 i Research&Monitoring 2,135,500 1,153.722 975.506 178.216 1827% 54.M% 981,778 W Repalrs&Maintererwe 5,287,600 1,774,176 2,127.682 (353,506) -16.61% 33.55% a513.324 w 1I81Nes 3.145,250 2,353,686 1,894,508 459,178 24.24% 74.83% 791,564 lxhar MMerlals,Supplies, and Services 2.476.490 923,444 88$2B8 41,158 4.65% 3729% 1,553,046 NMCost Alloca0on (19.906.600) (9,464,780) (8,999296) (465,484) 5.17% 47.55% (10,441,820) Total Jolyd Operating Expense 50,490.650 25,196,651 24.246,629 950.022 3.92% 49.90% 25,293,999 W Revenues (4,490,650) (1,524.578) (2,782,924) 1,258,346 45.22% 33.95% (2,966,072) Net Joint Operating Expense $ 46,000.000 $ 23.672073 $ 21.463,705 S 2,208,368 1D.29% 51.46% $22,327,927 V Gallonage Flow it 89,425.0D 45,196.00 43,93200 1,256 2.85% Gallonage Flow,(MOD) 245.O1) 245.84 238.78 6.88 208% Gallonage Floor(Vs 7MG) $514.40 5523.74 $488.57 $35.17 720% i 4r V I V Section 2-Page 4 vJ J.O. & W. C. Budget Review r Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 X 'a Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase Budget min Tnru Remaining thru (Decrease) (Dsonuhe) Description wo0411 1Wiffio 1mifflo Budget 1213V99 s % Inter District Sewer Use $1,862.650 $ (199,863) -10.73% $2,062.513 $1.452.968 $(1,652,831) -113.76% Waslehauler 425,000 232,286 54.66% 192.714 204,785 27,501 13.43% w Sludge Disposal 800,000 329,903 41.24% 470,097 394,970 (55,067) -14.30°.9 CNG Sales - 144,992 N/A (144,992) 1,491 143,501 9624.48% Scrap Sales - 11,758 WA (11,758) 3.139 8.619 274.58% as Other Sales - 2,253 WA (2,253) 2,136 117 5.48% Rents&Leases 128,000 118,992 92.96% 9,008 109.385 9,607 8.78% r General Non-Operating 75,000 82.902 110.54% (7,902) 51.807 31,095 60.02% Vehicle&Equipment 300,000 117,960 39.32% 182,040 150,660 (32.700) -21.70% Power Sales 550,000 413,353 75.16% 136,647 246,513 166,840 67.68% r Sampling Charges 350,IXI0 270,042 77.15% 79,958 175,070 94,972 54.25% Total Joint Operating Revenues $4,490,650 $1.524.578 33.95% $2,966,072 $2,782,924 $ 1,258,116) -45.22% r w w r r r r r r r Section 2—Page 5 r 2000-01 Mid-Year Report w Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Expense %Expense Expense Increase Incase wJ Budget TIM Tluu RmWrdn9 Thru (Dacrease) pecame) Ueaciptiorn 2000-M 121131100 121311M Budget 12/31/99 $ % salaries.Wanes.B Benefits W saladesBWages $ 34,839,700 $ 17,455227 50.10% $ 17.364.473 $ 16,719.319 $ 735.908 4.40% Employee Benefits: Retirement 2.400.300 834,920 34.78% 1,565,330 1,138,OW (303,080) .25.63% ,W Group lnsasrces 3,614,500 1,727,360 47.79% 1.887,140 1168816M 38,722 2.29% Tuition Reimbursement - 34,300 WA (34,300) 33,817 483 1.43% i- UnifomRanhel 69,200 35,754 51.67% 33,446 33,617 2,137 6.36% Workem'Canmensatim 310,200 155,003 49.97% 155,197 155,001 2 0.00% Unenployme t Irsuranas 53,800 9,864 18.33% 43,936 2,990 6,074 229.9D% .-. Total Benards 6,448,000 2.797201 43.3B% 3.650,799 3.052,063 (254.662) -8.35% V Salaries,Wages,B Bewb 41,297.700 20,252,428 49.0.5% 21,035,272 19,T71,382 481,046 2.43% Mall.Supple.&senloa W AdMnislntiw Expenses MerrOerships 185,5W 149,3m 00.49% 36.199 114.743 34,558 30.12% Office Ep-supplies 141.100 61,488 43.58% 79,612 61,3W 99 0.16% Officeftese-Other .09.300 34,854 39.03% 54,446 37.558 (2,704) -7.20% W small Canpuer hens 250,000 123,538 49.42% 126,462 92,467 31,071 33.60% Mnor Fumiboe,Fp&ffw,etc 97,100 41,644 47.81% 45,456 47,859 (&215) -12.99% Printing&Prmliration W Repo4n-Hose 254,300 123.960 48.75% 130,340 119,765 4,195 3.50% PCnbrg OutKL 59,450 21,525 36.21% 37,925 17,383 4,142 23.83% 1 Notices&Ads 30,600 32,918 107.58% (2,318) 17,970 14.948 83.18% L PhDID PMCaslllg 7,950 4,026 50.64% 3.924 3,09E 928 29.95% Training&Meetings - Meetings 223,850 100,007 44.6B% 123.843 114,398 (14,391) -12.68% V Training 678,000 277.759 40.97% 400241 271,817 6,942 2.19% Operadrg Expenses (3xsmcel QxWants 1,361.100 720,936 52,97% 640.164 600,708 120,228 20.01% Suffice Ombal 1,435.000 887250 61.83% 547.750 693,301 293,949 49.54% Odor Consd 997,800 840.402 8423% 157,398 695,443 144.959 20.84% _. Cherrcals-Cayneation Oper. 20.000 1,297 6.04% 18,793 2,153 (946) 43.94% Msr9larwous Chemicals 14,000 7,89D 56.36% 6,110 18,371 (10.481) -57.05% Casdira,Diesel 808 187,300 219,369 117.12% (32,069) 92.236 127.133 137.83% Tools 120,700 61,907 5129% 58.793 74,402 (12,495) -16.79% Sdv,Paints,8 Jan.supplies 43,9W 20,9D0 47.57% 23,044 18.558 Z348 12.65% 6" Lab(TemicelsBStpplies 386,400 208,306 53.91% 178,094 284.494 (76.188) -26.78% 011ie Operating Supplies 146,710 77.123 52.57% 69,587 79,673 (2,550) -a20% (Continue) W v Section 2—Page 6 W J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Expense %Expense Expanse Increase Increase Budget Thru lhm Remaining Thm (Decease) (Decease) Description 2000M 12/31100 12131= Budget 12/31199 $ % Continued: b+ Contractual Senses; Solids Removal 5,000.000 2603,557 5207% 2,396443 2179,177 424,380 19.47% Other Waste Disposal 467.100 85,3m 1827% 381,738 218.665 (133,303) -60,96% 6aadslaxPrg&Jaatorlal 410,000 M5,353 SS21% 183,647 213,779 1Z574 5.88% r Outudelab Services 265,700 99,561 37.47% 166,1M 85,344 16217 15.31% Oxygen Rant Oyer 295,000 144,818 49.09% 150,182 139,781 5.037 3.60 cow 801.40D 301,457 37.62% 499,943 455,193 (153,736) -M.77% Professional Service; Legal 42D,000 2U7,803 49.48% 2IZ197 220,265 (12462) 5.66% Aurtt&A>mauing 45,5M 42,6W 93.6% Z900 45.100 (Z500) -5.54% Erdneer g 277,500 1Z7243 4&WA 15029 166.735 (39,492) -23.69Y. r cuff 1,36Z500 348,9W 2561% 1,013,595 511,736 (IBZ831) 31.82% RessaNl&Nbruloring ErsimmnenW Monitoring 1,510,000 698,8Z7 59.62% 611,173 SM.548 98.279 1228'k Air Quality McMcnng 75.000 Z7,409 36.55% 47,591 - 27,409 WA ~ Research 550.500 227.486 41.32% 323,014 174,958 52528 30.02% Realm&Maintenance Matelots B Services 3,90Q050 1,363,340 34.92% Z540.710 1,752,712 (389,372) -2222% up Svc Ma Agrasnards 1,383,450 410.836 2970% 97Z614 374,970 35,865 9.67% Utilities Teleplme 251,850 1OZ978 40.89% USSM 108,354 (6,376) -4.96% Diesel For Gclerabos 11,01)0 8,487 77.15% Z513 10,003 (1,516) -1576% Natural Gas 1,130,000 1,Z78.949 113.18% (148,90) GM067 602,88E 89.17% Parer 921,500 481,982 52.30% 439,518 675,565 (193.573) -2866% Water 830.900 481,290 57.92% 349,610 424,529 56,761 13.37% s Gther Operating SUPPIles Outeds Egtup Rental 146,180 79,677 54.51% 66,5m 56,189 23,488 41.80% Disei tEquip Rental 32ZODD 117,676 36.55% 24,324 149.573 (31,897) -21.33% Insurance 120D.WD 515,389 4295% 6B4,611 479.657 35,732 7.45% �+ FregM SZ560 3ZO73 61.02% 20,497 25,539 6,534 25.510% Msd Opera9rg Epease 169,000 77,707 4598% 91293 81,461 ($754) 4.61% AQVOOperating Feas 121,000 65.844 5570% 53.155 61,824 5.020 &12% r Genre)Manager Can6rgercy 42ZS00 - 0.00% 42Z500 - - WA Prior year reeppmpiation - - WA - - - WA cow Nor"Oper Expense 44,250 34,078 77.01% 10.172 28,043 6.035 21.52% Mati;,SUPP,&som. 29106550 14,409.OD3 49.50% 14,700,547 1$474,543 —_W_T._46_D �6. % Total J.Q Requlremenis 70.397,250 34.661,431 4924% 35,735,819 33,245.925 1.41S506 425'/a Net Gosl Allocation (19,906,600) (9,464.780) 47.55% (10,441.821) (8,999,296) (465,484) 5.17% u+ NetJ.QRaqulroneNs 50,490,650 25,196,651 49.90% 25293,999 Zr4,246,629 950,022 3.92% Less: Revenue (4,490,650) (1,524,578) 33.95% (Z96SOM (278Z924) 1,25s,346 4522% Nnt J.Q ExpentOhees $ 46,000,000 $ 23,672073 51.46% $22327.977 $ 21,463,705 $ 2208,38B 10.29% r Section 2—Page 7 r 2000-01 Mid-Year Report `" Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process � For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Increase Increase '� Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 12131/00 12/31199 $ % Treatment Process: 1 u Preliminary Treatment $ 3,103,803 $ 2,531,111 $ 572,692 22.63% Primary Treatment 2,483.764 2,196,947 286,817 13.06% v Secondary Treatment 1,875,107 1,632,343 242,764 14.87% Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 290,340 295,844 (5,5(34) -1.86% v Effluent Disposal 272,000 349,008 (77,008) -22.06% 6w Solids Handling 10,691,525 9,443,518 1,248,007 13.22% Cogeneration 2,222,534 2,045,931 176,603 8.63% Utilities 534,216 543,405 (9,189) -1.69% I Electrical Distribution 282,446 322,849 (40,403) -12.51% kw Miscellaneous Buildings 2,171,359 2.373,443 (202,084) -8.51% 1 W Air Quality 185,894 652.480 (466,586) -71.51% Laboratory 1,083,663 1,859,750 (776,087) 41.73% L Total Joint Operating Requirements 25,196,651 24,246,629 950,022 3.92% Less: Revenues (1,524,578) (2,782,924) 1,258,346 45.22% W Net Joint Operating Expenditures $ 23,672,073 $ 21,463,705 $ 2,208,368 10.29% V �I w W I LI W Section 2—Page 8 L J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents December 31,2000 575 560 560 r 549 r 519 510 r r r 450 0&30/97 06/30/98 03/30/99 0&30/00 1531nOW ■Actual aVacent r r At December 31, 2000, the total head count was 509 employees, or a full time equivalency of r 498.75. r r Section 2— Page 9 2000-01 Mid-Year Report u U U L This Page Left Intentionally Blank V L u L L 1i Seelon 2—Page 10 CIP Review Capital Improvement Program—FV 2000.01 For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 51 daZas, s+0.refi,Be+ Hail'"arl:'s couactmn 6ealnias '0% 1;4 al:remnl. ndlia, a03 SaliEs XanCfmp Prror near O'9esnon6% E .,,Ouip nl 518 6.1en O.tlall Sy3aatU 2% WaterMana9emam <2Po KKlsams S2.402769 MiSwllanapua 6 59G12.a Support Propns S392,W Cdar Conlrol B% Prw 557�2+B esa RalalBE plant 799218 PTptla _ Pml Compa lton S'' tz% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$31,789,680 528)2,,BSi Coex:cn SK:errs r aoa .76a Paveny Nea M.l a% a7W.W9 21 w uaNwWla Total Capital Improvement Funding-$31,789,680 Section 3—Page 1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year U For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2000 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining PMjeeted V Outlay 12/31100 Outlay Outlay Collection System Improvement Protects Collections Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. S 64.000 $ 7.492 S 56,508 $ 92,000 u Pumpstatlon SCADA Communications Study 146,000 146,000 146,000 Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 119,000 - 119,000 119,000 Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 68,000 - 68,000 68,000 I Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 234.000 - 234.000 150,000 �j Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer 210,000 59.021 150,979 110.000 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sin.Abandonment 43.000 40,224 2,775 50,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer 146,000 135,419 10,561 310,000 ' I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations 15.000 7,881 7,119 43.000 u Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protec. 1,475,000 953,595 521,405 2,238.000 Taft Branch Improvements 7,000 - 7,00D 7.000 Atwood Subtrunk Improvements 92.000 42,505 49.494 160,000 Replacement of Miler-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 49,000 879.554 (830,664) 900,000 y Orange-Westem Sublrunk Relief Sewer 1,186.000 35,523 1,150,477 1,000,000 Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer 2,214,000 341,010 1,872.990 341,100 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach l 3.662,000 2,399,870 1.262,130 3,051,000 Rehabilitation of the Westide Pump Station - 4,769 (4,769) 50,000 Y.I Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave. 73,000 - 73,000 73,000 Big Canyon Ditties Sewer Rehabilitation 38,000 8.842 31,158 22,000 Replacement of Back Bay Tmnk Sewer 1,768,000 84.002 1.853.998 108.000 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 98.000 27,960 70.040 92.000 V Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 118,000 30,537 87,463 100.000 Rehabilitation or the 141h Street Pump Station 188.000 50.044 137,956 175,000 Rehabilitation of the W Steel Pump Station 193.000 42,935 150,085 175.000 Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 72,000 11,326 60,674 70.000 V Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 46.000 6,462 39,548 46.000 Abandonment of AS Trunk,Watson and Cal.Sewers - 14.182 (14,182) XODO Goldenwesl Trunk Sewer Replacement 1,310,000 1.095.630 214,370 1,739.000 Heil Avenue Interceptor 1.944.000 2.752,248 (808,248) 3,244,000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 177.000 152,694 24,306 250,000 Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy. 51,000 - 51.000 51,000 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 25,000 4,528 20,474 50,000 , 1 Capital Improvements,Collections 14,000 - 14,000 14,000 IIIYsarii1l Realignment of S.Anaheim Rif - 29,166 (29,166) 459,000 Euclid Tmnk Manhole Rehabilitation - 3.483 (3,483) 4.000 Replace SARI Control Gate - 1,401 (1,401) 2,00D Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab. - 702 (702) 1,000 Miller-Holder Improvement - 591,500 (591.500) 591,500 Relocation of Lido Pump station - 47.624 (47.624) 48,000 Goldenwesl St.Sewer Replacement 2,238 (2,238) 2.500 New Pump Project-Edinger Pump Station - 62,814 (52,1114) 60,000 1-5 Freeway Widening 259 (259) 500 1r� Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway Widening - 676 (676) 1,000 Huntington Beach Saw Abandonment - 1,386 (1,386) 1,500 Subtotal-Collections 15,846,g00 9,917,491 ...Sea 18 Revenue Area 7 Rehabil!tation of Outlying Pump Stations-Area 7 4,000 3,881 119 21,100 Racquel Hill Pump Station Abandonment 66,000 2,973 63.027 3.000 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. - 6,695 (6,695) 66,000 Tustin Aim Armstrong ase-Astrong Subtunk Sewer 234,000 978 233,022 1,000 Gisler-Redhill Tmnk Relocation - - - - MCGawSubtunk Sew B Pump Bullion Abandonment 23,000 - 23,000 - L L Section 3-Page 2 I ! CIP Review r„ Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 20DO-01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 r Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay 12/31/00 Culls �Culla Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reech'A' 236,000 7� 225,487 120,O00 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach'B' 69,000 7,266 61.734 12,000 r Tustin Trunk Improvements 59.000 5.672 63,328 12,000 Orange Trunk Improvements 186,000 81868 157,132 100,000 West Trunk improvements 9,000 1,164 7,836 2,000 Gisler-RedhillModh Trunk Improvements 228,000 10.718 217,282 130,000 ,r Replacement of the College Ave.Pump Station - - - - Rehabilitation of the MacArthur Pump Station - - - Main-Baker Force Main Ventilation 30,000 - 30,000 30,000 Improvements to Main St.P.S. - 8,524 (8,524) 9,000 ,r College Ave PS Parallel Force - 315 (316) 500 Bubbler System Upgrade for 3 Pump Stations 1767 (1.767) 2,000 Subtotal-Revenue Area 7 1,124,000 69534 1,054.866 508,600 Revenue Area 14 �r Tustin Airbase-Armstrong Subtmnk Sewer 686,000 Z646 585,354 3,000 I mptowments to Main St.P.S. 21,920 (21,920) 22,000 Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 588,000 U'lets 563434 25,000 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 17,557,000 10,011,391 7,545,609 16,778,700 r Treatment 8 Disposal Projects Collections Facilities Busham Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 534,000 296,544 237458 501,000 r Co-op Projects,Inflow/Infill.Reduction 2,752,000 430,368 2.321,632 2,127,000 Transfer to Other Projects: (44,111) - (44,111) - Nuisence Flow Diversion Fac at Newport Dunes - 1.559 (1,559) 2,000 SSES for Three Collection Areas ",Ill 46.219 (2,108) 80,600 .. Dislrictmide Geographical Information System(GIB) 300,000 - 300,000 100,000 SSO Training Facility 64,000 - 64,000 64,000 Rehab 8 Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station 10,000 Subtotal-Collections Facilities 3,650,000 774,690 2,875,310 2,B84.600 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 609,000 815,853 (206.853) 932,000 Sunflower Drive Replacement 247,000 52,850 194,150 235,000 Headworke Rehabilitation/Refurbishment 30,000 18,656 11,344 20,000 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 133,000 365,440 (232.440) 677,000 Headwarks Pump Improvement B Overhaul - 23.351 (23,351) 24,000 Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors - 26.431 _L211.431_1 27,000 Subtotal-Headworks 1,018.000 1,302,587 263581 1,915,000 Primary Treatmant Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 247,000 31,205 216,795 370,000 Pri.Clarifiers 1631 8 Related Facilities 6,647,000 587,215 6,059,785 737.000 Waste Sidesbwrn Pump Station Upgrade 567,000 567,OOD 300,000 Circular Clarifier Drive ReplacemenWpgrade 344.000 - 344,OOD 50,000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 80,000 - 80.00D 30,000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364,001) 364,000 25,000 M Subtotal-Primary Treatment 8,240,000 018,420 7,630.580 1,512,000 Secondary Treatment Sac.Treat Monitoring 8 Chin Sys.Upgrade 901,000 30.834 870,166 43.000 Rehab Triclding Filters 8 Construct New Clarifiers 494,000 47.621 446,379 295,000 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 312,0D0 - 312,000 50,000 Oxygen Plant Replacemen6RehaNlitilion 110,00D 110.000 30,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 200000 - 200,000 40,000 Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2.017:000 78 1,938,645 458,000 r Section 3-Page 3 2000-01 Mid-Year Report W Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2000 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected la,i Outlay 12131100 Outlay Outlay Solids Handling&Digestion Dewatenng Belt Press Rebuild 210,000 67,148 142,852 120,000 Dewalering Belt Press Extension 230,000 5,051 224.949 150,000 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 3.929.000 2.429,415 1,499,686 3,633,000 Solids Storage and Truck Leading Facility 2,632,000 2,524,630 1D7.370 3,298,000 _ Digestion&Dewater ng Rehab./Refurbishment 66.000 - 66,000 - Dewalering Belt Press Rebuild 326,000 36,419 289.581 150,000 High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mach.Seals 425,000 55,841 389,159 75,000 Belt Press Automation 91,000 13,487 77,613 30,000 Sludge Grinder Replacement 222,000 23,915 198,085 150,000 Tule Ranch Acquisition/Biosolids Management Site 4,774.000 58.815 4.715,185 100.000 V Subtotal-Solids Handling&Digestion L 1 , 7 7.690,279 7,706,000 Ocean Outfall Systems Ou6all Flow Meter Replacement 380,400 141,417 238.983 917,000 Peak Flow Management 484,400 148,080 335,720 224,000 y Effluent Pumping Station Annex 859.200 184,145 675,055 298,000 Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall - 25,278 (252761 33,000 Subtotal-Ocean Outten Systems 1,724,000 499,518 .224A 1,472,000 UOIity Systems Electrical Power System Studies 4a8,000 210,853 277,147 290,D00 Standby Power and Reliability Modifications 1.528,000 723.048 804,952 1,257.000 Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1&2 67,000 111.884 (54,984) 126.000 Impr.To Gen-Gen Starting Air System 62,000 8.577 63,423 9,OD0 Storm Drain Database Development and Tagging 100.000 - 100,000 100,000 Central Generation Automation 101.000 1,493 99,507 101,000 Chemical Facility Mods.Al Plant No.1 699,000 700.834 (1,834) 882,000 Plant Utilities Rehabilitaton/Refumishmenl - 2,881 (2,881) 3,000 L Modifications to Elec.&Control Systems 483,000 261,240 221,780 393,000 High Pressure Compressed Air System 74,000 42,204 31,796 43,000 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 299.000 27.122 271,878 32,000 Utilities Rehabilitaton and Refurbishment 312,000 97,720 214,280 234.000 V Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120.000 - 120,000 25,000 East and West RAS Elevator Upgrade 106.000 - 106,000 25,000 Electrical Facility Modifications&Safety Upgrades �4 18�8 4,186 4.200 I Subtotal•Utility Systems " '-` 2,2311:1 3,524,200 L Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 347.000 49.173 297,827 470,000 1 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 3 D.= 105,536 274,464 200,000 Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 70.000 711,930 (641,930) 712,000 V Automation of Foul Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 73,0D0 10.000 Scrubber Chem.Feed System Mods. 430000 77,626 352.374 78.000 subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 1, 00,01� 1�470, 00 Plant Automation&Computerization L Computerized Facility Revs.&Dwg.System 909,000 1.068,443 (159,443) 1.712,000 Power Monitoring and Control Systems 374,000 4,839 369,161 23,000 Plant Reinvention/Automa0on Project 2,660,D00 1.816,678 843,322 2,520,000 CMMS Programming 129,D00 99,694 29.306 129,000 Dowment Management 559,000 43,216 616,784 200,000 Data Integration 559,000 72,461 486.539 275,000 1 Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 157,000 25,315 131.686 157,000 (wl Intranet Application Development 136,000 1.934 134,056 50,000 Internet E-mall Browsing(Websile) 91,000 450 90,550 91,000 Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 134,000 172,796 (38,796) 200,000 LA L Section 3-Page 4 V CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 20DO-01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 a. Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Out 12/31/00 Outlay 0utla Voice-Data Building Rewiring HEM2.2,827 27,173 .000 Records Management Program 165,DDO 125.139 39,861 165,000 r Source Control Programming 80,000 46,432 33,568 80,00D Geographic information System 978,000 98.822 879.178 150,000 Automation Report Publishing 39,000 84,9a2 (45.982) 195,000 Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 264,000 1,581 282,419 240,000 r Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 210,000 T7,978 132,022 187.000 SCADA Communicatlan-Ethernet Study 157,000 - 157,000 - Replacement oflnterplant Fiber Optics 445.000 9,698 435,402 40,000 Wintlova 2000 Migration 333.000 3.192 329,008 130,000 ,r Office 20DO Upgrade 69,000 - 69,001) - SCADA System Replacement Study 310,00D - 310,00D - SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 458,OOD - 458.000 100,00D Plant Di vatedng PLC SCADA Upgrade 281,000 - 281,000 50,00D ,r FIS Upgrade 1,281,OOD 20,200 1.260.800 400,000 Information Technology Disaster Recovery 91,000 2,641 88.359 80.000 Specialized Process Network 100 o00 100,000 - Subtotal•Plant Automation 8 Computerization 11, ,000 7,239,782 7,224,000 ,r Process Related Special Projects Standard Speci6ca0ans Revisions and Updates 20,0DO 10,063 9.937 13,D00 Thermal Insulation Management Program 49,000 - 49,000 20,000 Plant O&M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 1,608,000 - 108,000 200,000 ,., Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 447,0D0 110,591 336,409 250,000 Managed Maintenance Program 34SODO - 348,000 100,000 Special Projects for FY 2000.01: Solids Processing 258,000 239,314 18.686 258.000 Six:Proj 00-01: Odor Control/Regulatory Compliance 651,000 54.761 596.239 600,000 Special Projects for FY 2000-2001: Liquid Streams 215 000 � (22 096) 237,096 215,000 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 3,598,U06 92 3,203,967 1,556,000 Miscellaneous&Support Projects Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 1,042,000 479.457 662,643 943,000 r Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1,042,000 542,975 499,025 MADO Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 1,042,000 488,483 553,517 S43,0D0 Area Classification Studies 1,278,000 659.927 608,073 1,642,000 Strategic Plan-Phase 2 96,0D0 39.002 56,998 56,000 Strategic Plan Program EIR 33.000 15,770 17,230 29.000 Modificidons to Exiling Mach.Systems 476.000 4.492 471,608 5,000 HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.1 and 2 737.000 2,446 734.654 3,000 Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 128,000 11,322 116.678 75,100 y Security System Improvements 383,000 67,942 315,058 125,000 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 500,000 80,953 419,047 500.000 Warehouse Reinvenfion Project 240.000 - 240,000 80,000 Process Safety Management Compliance Program 30000 - 30 000 15.000 Subtotal•Miscellaneous&Support Projects 7,027:000 ----T.W2-,769 5,294,100 Water Management Projects Groundwater Replenishment System 2,329,000 909.042 1,419,958 1,601,000 Water Conservation 418,000 415,534 2,466 520,000 r Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program 3,358,000 19,565 3.338.435 327,000 Subtotal-Water Management Projects 6.105,000 7,34d,t41 4.760,859 2,448,000 Construction in Progress Completed at 6130100 726,483 (726.483) 727,000 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 63,060,000 20,290 036 42,769,964 38,180,900 uy Capital Equipment Purchases 2,912,000 1,488,253 1.423.747 2,912,000 Total Collection.and Treatment&Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases It 83,529,000 $ 31,789,680 $ 51,739,320 $ 57,871,600 Section 3-Page 5 2000-01 Mid-Year Report " Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2000 current Total ApWoved Jua 30,MOO year Projected garnering tr Project Av Mated Projected Cast at Future Budget cost Cost June 30,2001 Budget Collection System Imorovemert Prot , collections V Santa Am Tmnk Seger Releb. $ 7.494,000 $ 75,053 $ 92,000 $ 167,063 $ 7,326.937 Pur potation SCADA Carmwniquons Stidy 146= - 146,000 146,000 - Continuus Feed Cherrval Teetme l F-acilily 3D6,000 - 119,000 119,000 189.00D Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 68,00D - 68,000 68,000 V Tnmk Sava Mapping Project 362,OOD - IK000 150,000 21ZODD Carbon Canyon Dam InlercepW Parallel Serer 5.W7,000 28,039 110,000 138.039 4,888,961 Carbon Cnyn Seaerand Pump Son.Abandonment 2685,000 65,185 50,000 115,185 2589,815 Santa An Fbw Interceptor RhAefSaeer 11,853,Um 38,606 310,000 348,6DO 11,504.394 V ns Rehabilitation of Outlying lomp Statio 8D4,000 348.967 43,000 391,957 41ZO33 Santa Ana River lnte®pla Realignment and Proles. 49,707.00) 656,437 2,238,000 2,894,437 48,892,553 Taft Branch Impnnerenb 4,742,000 9,385 7,000 16,386 4,725.614 Ateoad Subbunk Improvements 1,890,000 62,621 18g0o0 222,621 1,667,379 Faleid Relief lhrprwerrnnb-Reach*9 10,831,000 13,510 13,510 10.817.490 W Replacement of Mllm-Holder Tnft Sever Siphon 11996,000 64,434 900,00D 954,434 1,031,558 OrangsWetten Subtnmk Relief Sewer 1,232,000 52,585 1,000,000 1,052,565 179.435 RollaNiitation of to MagnliaTmnk Saner 10,354,000 7,531,534 341,100 7,11M.634 2p81,356 Relociltb6on of Magnolia Tnmk Seger,Phase 12,127,000 - - - 12,127,000 �rl Mller-Holtlx Trunk Sewer System Reach l 10,697,000 7,724.755 3,051.001) 10,775,755 (78.750 Rehzbibilon of Be Seal Beach Pup Station 3.083.000 - - - 3,09000 Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump StaOm 1.519.000 148 50,000 50,148 1,5%852 1 Mcea.To Magnolia Relief Sever In Western Age. 2D9,000 - 73,000 73,000 136.000 4/ Big Canyon Made Se RehaWlitatian 2,714AW 4.399 22,000 25.390 ZSff7,Wl Replacement of Bark Bay Trunk Sever 8,085.000 265.236 108.ODO 393.236 7,701,764 Replacement of the BMm Point Pump Station 3,480,000 9.940 9Q000 101.940 3.37 OSO Replacement of to Rmky Point Pulp Station 4,124,000 7,549 100,000 107,549 4.016.451 1 Rehzblilaton of the loth Street Pump Station 2.211.000 5.286 17%ODO 180,266 2BW.714 Reabiliation of the-A-Skeet Pup Station 22MODO 4,205 175.000 179,205 ZOSM795 Rehab1iuton of the Bay Brkip Pump Station 1.094,000 - 70,ODO 70,000 1,024,000 Rehabilitation of to Crystal Coe Pup Station 306,0DO 369 46,000 46,389 259,631 Abandonment of AS Truk,Watson and Cal.Se 2,176.00D 130,218 30,OW 160,218 2,015,782 Goldemlest Twnk Sever Replacement 4.507.ODD 2,472,563 1,739,000 4,211,563 295,437 Heil Avenue Interceptor 3,711.000 217.604 3.244,000 3.461,604 249,396 l Wamer Avenue Relief Saner 3.399,000 48.079 250,000 298,079 3.100,921 lea lateral and SeexAbaMmment atParlficCoaet Mvy. 12D.000 - 51,000 51,000 78,000 Rcebilitatica of the E&Wr Pup Station 1,449,0D0 389 MOOD 501388 1,398,631 Capital lmpNvbmenta,Collectors 500,000 - 14,000 14,000 466.00D Realignment of S.Anaheim RB - 459.OD0 459,000 (459.000) Eudid Tnntc Manhole Rehabilitation 1.964.700 1.516,728 4,OOD 1,52D,728 443,972 Replace SARI Control Gate 757,000 794,651 2.000 796,661 (39.661) Seal Beach Mo.Rehab. 460,000 416,892 1,000 41718M 42,10E INW- loltler IMPOARxnta sUi.000 SO27,BW 591,500 6.619.320 (275,32)) Ra'oation of lido Pump station 3,395,200 3.391.452 48.000 3,439.452 (44,252) W Goldenvast St.Swr Replecemet 491,700 368.476 2,500 370.976 120,724 New Pump Project-Ednger Pup Station - 59D 60,000 60,590 (60,590) ISReemyWirlelalg 67,1011 127,755 500 123.255 (56,155) Nempatt BoulevaN and Padfic COW KM Wdening 1,207.800 2284,876 1.000 2,285,876 (1.078.018) Iwl Fkmtinglon Beach Sever Abardwerenl SX70D 198,900 1,5m 336 SuNotal-Cdimllons 3 , ,218 1 100 141A ,= Revenue Area tlyb IrJ Rehabilitation of Oug Pump s p Stations 396,000 708.508 21,i D0 729,608 (333,800) Racquet Mil Pup Station Abandasneat 126000 65,689 3,ODD %689 57,311 Sunflower lnWceW MadMe Rehab. 5,387,ODO 114,024 66,000 180,024 5=906 W fr Section 3-Page 6 Irl r CIP Review r. Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Current Trial r Approved June 30,2000 Year Projected Remaining Product Accwnuialed Projected cont st Future Budget Coat cost June 30.2001 Budget Tustin ALbese-Anrstrorlg Subbunk Sever 1,731,000 91.07T1,83BT,JZT- `, Gsler-Redhlll Trunk Reioa0m 5,704,000 - - - 5,704,000 MCBaw Subsudu Serer&Pump Sla0on Abandonmerd 1,273,000 - - - 1,273,000 GLeter4WItIll Trunk lmpernerrox,Read•W 4,026,OW 291864 120,000 149,854 3,878,135 Gislr-Redhill SystmnlmprovMrents,ReaCi-B- 5.013,000 - 12,OW 12.000 51001,000 Tustin Trunk Inyxovenrents 3.656,000 - 12,OD0 12,OOO &644.000 Grange Trunk lmpmerrems 3.942,000 29,675 100,OD0 129.675 3,&12,325 West Trunk lrryroeemenls 496,000 - ZODO 2000 494.000 Gishh4ledhill/North Trunk lrtpnovenrents 5,704,000 39.418 130,000 109,418 5,534.582 Repiaoamenl of tiro College Am Pump Slow 4,717,000 - - - 4,717,000 r Rehabilitation of the MacArthur Pump Station 1,354,000 - 1,354,000 MalnBaker Force Main Ventilation 3D,00D - 30,000 30,000 - Irrpm✓wnartsto Man St.P.S. 1086,680 1.223,132 9,000 1,232,132 (145.452) COMM Ave PS Pa2tlet Forte 1,877,000 81,483 500 81,983 1,795.017 Bubbler System for r tiara Z000 2.000 Suttctel-Revenos Meer 46,513,630 2.3�ez,e' � �2, � 43_y627 Z0 Revenue Area 14 Tustin Mrbase-Amatrerg Subbunk Serer 4,621,000 2 .202 3,000 237,202 4.383.798 �, In4xo�emerrts to Main St P.S. 2,791.320 3,145,197 22,000 3.167,197 372 Subtotal-Revenue Mee 14 7,415,320 3,379,399 M." 3,404,399 4,010 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 246,597,2011 40,742,489 16,TT&700 67.521,189 18,076,011 Treatment&Disposal Proieds r collections Fredlllles BushaN Trunk Senor fislubilita0m 30,630,000 122,482 501,000 623,482 30.005,518 Coop Projects,InFaMlnfilt Reduction 144,750,OOD 244,482 2,127,000 2,371,482 142,378,518 Tranefer to Weer Projects: (140.284) - - (140,284) Nuisanw Row Diversion Facat Newport Durres 40,OOO 20,397 2,000 22,397 17,003 SSES for Three Collection Areas 10D,284 2,378 80,60O 82,g78 17,3D8 District-ekle GeograpNal lnfomatim Sysrem(GIS) 2,500,01DO - 100,BOD 101),000 2,400,000 SSOTraining FadDly 84,000 - 64,000 64,OOD - r Rehab&Upgrade of Site Ave.parry Station 1,799500 1728 10000 11.728 1,7977777722 Subotal-Collection,Facilittes �8,0 . rg l ae7pu Heedworks Olt Auger Replacenenl 1,088,OD0 108.504 93ZODO 1,040.604 47.396 Sue9oeer Dose Replacement 407.000 71,953 235,000 308,953 100,047 r Headwalls RehadlltatloNRefivdshmem 4,330,000 416 20,000 2D,416 4,309,551 HeaW.alcs lrrpnwmrenla at Ram No.2 74,118,000 319,944 877,000 996,944 73.121.056 Headworka Parry Improwerrol&Overhaul 300,000 200,189 24,OD0 224,189 75,811 U M f Rehab of wage n Se Pump Motorss 98 r' Rehab Headworks, Primary Troatrrrenl Facilities Moddlaiom for Odor coned 276,,000 13,191 370,OW 383,191 1107,191) N.Clarifiers 16.31&Related Fohike 75.450,000 3,415,30E 737,OOD 4,152,305 71,297,695 �+ Waste Sidesbeam Pump Station Upgrade 1,0es,000 - 300.000 300,000 769,000 circular Clarifier Drive ReplaarrenWpgrade 5,840,000 - 510.0%) 50,000 5.79D,OOD Sludge Density Lester Upgrades 80D.000 - 30,000 30,000 770001) Sludge Level Measurenenl Devla Irsla9a0m 364.OD0 BOB 25,000 339.000 r Subtotal-Primary Treabrent 7&B58 8ewndery Tr®sNnnt Sec Treat Moiltorirg&Oral Sys.Up Wade 4,317,OD0 485.597 43,0OD 509,597 3,BD7,403 Rehab Ticking Fillers&C=bvct New Clarifiers 21,001,OOD 18.746 295,000 313,746 M,697,254 Acthetsd Sludge Rard Relrerdlilation 3,745,000 %BOB 50ODD 3.695.000 O.rygen Rant Replaarten0Rallabllllaticn 110.000 - 30,O00 30,000 80,000 Adhrated Budge Aenaem Basin Selector Study 510 ODD 40 OD0 40 B00 470,000 Subtotal-Secondary Treaan,nt r Section 3-Page 7 2000-01 Mid-Year Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life L For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2000 Current Total Approved June 30.MOO Year Projected Ramalnbg V Protect Aauonulated Projected Oast al Future Budget Cost Coat June 30,2001 BudWt Solids Handing 6 Digestion Ca WAN Belt Press Rebuild 528.001) 279,736 120poO 399,738 128264 Deeetedng Beg Press Fxtenelon 230,000 - 150p0O 150,ODD 80,000 y Rehabilitation of Dgeslea at Plant No.2 172XOOO 6,422.M 3.633,oxi 10,055299 7.178.701 WIM Storage and Tatl,loading Facility 15,120000 1.394,276 3,2980DO 4.692276 10.427,724 Digestion B Daretalrg Re ao/RefurcistmreM 7,&*,000 - - 7AM,000 j Deealerbg Batt Press Rebuild 525,OOD 255.522 150,000 405A22 419.47a LI IBgh Rate Digeater My Pumps Meth.Seals 517,000 258,988 75,000 331,988 165.012 Belt Rase Aulanation 175,000 33,909 30,000 63.909 11141111 Sludge Gdndar Replacermd 224,000 16776 150,000 166,775 57,7a/ TWO Rench Acquisiicia iomllds Management Site 9.880,001) 100,000 100000 9.750A00 69 Subtotal-Solids Handling B Digestion WADSaw 8595g8 7,70111,0111 381137AW Oman Oulfal Syeteins CNFaIl Flow Mate Replamnont 1.124,000 107A37 917,000 1,024,437 991563 Peak Flrn Management 4,066,001) 63.753 224,000 267,753 3.767,247 V Effluent Pumping Station Annex 28,346,001) 87,793 296,000 381 27,960,207 Inves9gation and Repar of 0oean Ouaall 1274AM 1,104M 38000 1,137.891 136,9ge Subtotal-Oman OuYall System 34,799,= 1,472,01310 2A3W 31963 UuntySysterne LW FJeo dcal Po System Studies 3216,001) 1,677,997 290,000 1,967,997 1248,003 Standby Poser and Reliability Modficatlons 17A70,00D 5,530,352 12571000 7,087,362 10=.638 Cable Tray lmprwemonts at Plants 182 28,a78AD0 879.344 125,000 1,005.344 26.872.656 Imp.To Cenfen Sbuft Air System 141.000 18,333 %ODO 27.333 113.667 L Slam Drain Database Devalopnent and Tagging 100.00D - 100,000 100,000 - CelsralGeneztionAdooation 2.964,000 - 101,000 101,000 2,853,ODO Chemical Fadlfly Nbds.A Plant No.1 3.766.000 2.968.WA 882,000 3,850,524 (82,52A) Poad Uelilles Rehabil d lorMelurdahment 3,360,000 - 3,000 3.000 3.357.000 L Modficatlons to Ekr 6Control Systems 2.615.000 2,036.632 393,000 2,429,632 185.368 Mgh Pressure Compesssd Air System 409.000 366.193 43,ODO 399,193 9.807 Gal Compressor Addtbn at Plant No.2 907,000 21,100 32.0D0 53.100 853.900 Willies Rehabilitation and RefunMeMant 3,394,000 49.302 234,000 283.302 3.110.698 Underground Slarage Tank leak Dalatlm Upgrade 120.00D - now 25.000 95.001) East an!West RAS Elevator Upgrade 10B4O00 25.ODO 25,000 81.000 Electrical Facility abdificxgom B Safety Upgadee 44290D 24BA65 4200 252,665 190.235 j Subtotal-WIHy Systeme 10.088252 3,524,200 17,610AM 48180A48 lyl Odor Control Related Projects FadlNes Nodifimtbm for Odor Coned 384,000 15.739 470,000 486.739 (101.739) Facilities Nbddcatlone far Door Coned 2.686.000 14,394 20D.000 214.394 2,471,606 Comprehenalve Odor Control Assssament 3.466.ODO 182,898 712,000 894,896 2.571,102 L ludometlon Of Foul Alr Sysla,Contlensate D anage 73.000 - 10.000 10,000 63.00D SrnrbOrr Chan.Feed System Made. 796,000 154,102 78,000 232102 553.898 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 7A08000 367,133 1,470AW 1,837,133 5.587,867 Plant Automa0on 8 Computerization y Computerized Facility Ras.B Dvg.System 4,956.000 2.994,448 1,71ZOOD 0.706.448 249,552 Poser hbJtorlig and Coned Systems 3=ODO 18,046 23.000 41.046 3.313.954 Pled RahverdOWAAMMIDn Prgad 25,760,DDO 5.585,645 2.520,000 8.103.645 17,651,355 CWS Ragammlrg 49D.000 274,082 lam 403.082 W918 y Document Nbnagement 864,000 476,620 200,000 976A20 187,380 Data Integration 4.33a000 2039,497 275,ODO 2.314,487 2,019,513 Strategic lnforrration Architecture(SIA) 724A00 272,552 157.000 429,5M 294.416 Intranet Application Develognent 3DO.000 78834 50.0DD 128,am 171.166 edertrel E-mell Bruesi g(Websde) 30D,000 169,939 91,ODO 291 39,061 NeMadc SadOone Upgrade Continuation 1,497,000 1.004,106 200,000 1,204,106 2OZ894 L II W Section 3—Page 8 L CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Cumea Total r Pppro"d June30,2000 Year Proleclad RmalNrp Project Arn4enulaled Projected Cmtat Futuna Cost Wad June 30,21101 Budget vace0ala B&uldrg Rewiring VO.ODO 116,997 50000 665.997 1ZO03 Records Maragenent". 255.000 64,445 165.000 229."6 25,555 Source Control Pworemming SPA00 334.433 80.000 4M,433 162.561 Gaggrephb lnfomaxln System 4,157AW 154.346 150.ODO 304,346 3.85Z654 Patoma00n Repwt Publishing 195AOD se" 195AM 284217 (89217) Fold Rba Optic UWratles 6WAW 254= 240ADD 494.Sn 165.428 'y Rdd Rber Opec Tamfal SlaMard� 325.00D 273216 167,0DO 480.216 (135216) SCAOA Canmuniatias-EOiemel Study 157,00D 141 - 141 158859 Replaoarwnt of Interplant F.Ixe OpOa 499,Om - 40,000 40.000 tse.ont wt v 20W Mgada 333.00D 130,000 130.000 203,00D .r Office 20DO Upgrade 69.000 - 69.000 SCADA Systarl Rrplacenerd SOrty 310,000 - - - 310,000 SCAM Gaahirs Tagpeg Uptake 670,000 - 100.00D 100.000 570.000 Plant 2 De atedng PLC SC4DA upgrade 281.ODO - 50.00D 50.000 231.000 FIS Upgrade 1.851,000 - 400,000 400,000 1.461,000 InfaraOen Tecnclogy Disatx,,Remarry 140.00D - 80,000 am 60.000 Speo a oed Process Nela W7,000 107.000 Subtotal-Plant llutoma0on 8 Computerlv6on 53,1145AW 14.704.168 7,224000 21,928,156 31,916.BW r Process Related Special Projects Slaidatl Spetifiato s Rehsiora and Upda!es 200.000 433.453 13.000 448,453 (246.453) ThemW Insulation Maregenient Program 800.0DO 20.0DO MODO 780,000 Plan 08 M Manual and SOP Project-Phased 4AODAOO 1,330 2DO.00D 201.330 3,798.670 Hazardous Enegy Cmbol Pmoedwes 1,19"W 4Z414 250,000 2OZ414 897.585 Managed Wrtenarre Program 8T0.000 - 100,00D 100.000 770,000 Special Pneds for PY 20WO1: Solids Processing 67%WD 702,257 258,000 950= 05257) SPC Prof 0001: Odor CM*dfftwatay C rnpllanre 651.000 1298.110 5D%W0 1,79el10 (1.147,110) Special Pojects for FY 2000.2001: Uquid Steams 215AOD 215AM 215.000 - subtotal-Process Related Specal Projects 8,801AW 2m7T 1,556A00 4,033,5154 4567AX MLFadilt Er 85uppoH Project FwWes Engineering Prgecs-Plant 20,000.000 399,933 94MODO 1,812,725 18,187275 FadliBas Engtleehlg Pmle6s-Plant 1 20,000,000 341,320 88M000 1.384.32) 18.815AW Area cLs bSVation S roods-Plant 1 2r.919A D 748.814 643.000 2,390,814 18,815,680 Stra C4c Plan lion Sees T7A79ADa 748.814 1, 56.000 23S0.844 25,528.166 Slmlegic Plan-Phaarn 2,193AD0 2,S17.044 58,0D0 2U6.254 12$956 Modifications Ran Program ER Z694.000 253.= 29,00D 848,257 2T2.743 Modlfia8aaneFoRepla Made Syslernt $757.000 29,822 5.00D3=() 258,8V3.000 2435.178 754= HV dacapela d I f Replac9 Plant t Prams W.l and 2 810,000 - MOOO 3,000 734AW Larcbapese lMgatmr at Plats tb.2 810.000 - 25,10D 75,10D07.384 734,90D Seal)C p.Equ .Pp Ie nals 1.740.000 182384 125,000 689.408 M.616 r Want Cap.Egrup.Replaomjed Projxi 740AW 189,408 500.000 689.408 50.592 Wants Safety Protect e3aOOD - B0AD0 15.000 610.OD0 Rcaastafey Managem .IsSlienee Program 30.000 - 15.000 KW 15.000 Subtotal-Mlscellanaous83vppac Projects 95,1 .000 8110,T07 � 11,380.807 86,B02193 Water Maage"M Projects &vxxhatar Rep!ems nrerrt System 178.222,000 2584,346 1.601,000 4,185.346 174,036,654 Water Cwserrzton 4.644,000 953,462 Smollo 1.473,462 3.17g538 Long Tenn Pemaxnl Motoring Program 5,000,000 3Z7.00D 3Z7,000 4,67MOOD Sun tal-Water Marageoerd Projects 197,865.000 3,537,806 244800D 5,935,80e 181,=,1W CoraVuclon In Progress Completed M 6rJ014)(I 50.070.467 7ZT,000 Sg797,467 (S4.797.467) Total Treabrem and Disposal Projects 882695,000 110AS4,899 38,180.900 148635.799 734.049201 Capital Equlpmerd Purcha 2912000 2912AW 2,912000 Total collections and Treatment B Oispoeal Project aa1 capital Equlp.nt Purdasee 81,132,1942W S 151,1972ee $ 67,871.600 $209.068.998 3 92M125212 Section 3-Page 9 2000-01 Mid-Year Report LW I V V L V ' j 1-1 L This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L L L L i L I . section s—Page 10 L Budget Review by Revenue Area r All Revenue Areas'Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Operating Budget Review r 2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of 1%) $ 34.504,000 $15,196.158 $ 19,307,842 44.04% Connection Fees 4,823.000 3,346,605 1,476,395 69.39% Other Fees 74,258,000 27.972,142 46,285,858 37.67% r Sale of Capacity Rights 6.340.100 - 6,340,100 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 31,410,000 22,056,326 9,353,674 70.22% r Total Revenues $ 151,335,100 $68,571,231 $ 82,763,869 45.31% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 65,972,000 $21,778,289 $ 44,193,711 33.01% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 17,554,000 10,011,391 7,542,609 67.03% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 40,737,000 23,078,974 17,658,026 56.65% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 46,000,000 23,672,073 22,327.927 51.46% r Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,545.000 5,060,670 4,484,330 53.02% Total Outlays $ 179,808,000 $83,601,397 $ 96,206,603 46A9% r Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101100 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: r Collection Activity Construction In Progress $ 25,521,061 $10,011.391 $ - $ 35,532,452 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 89,018,262 21,778,289 110,796,551 Sub-Total 114.639,323 31.789,680 146,329,003 r PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 10.398,596 - - 10,398,696 r Collection Lines and Pump Stations 357,104,332 - - 357,104.332 Treatment Facilities 600,045,286 - - 600,045,285 Disposal Facilities 90,108,851 - - 90.108,851 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 111,364,203 111,354.203 Sub-Total 1,169,011,267 - 1,169,011.267 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1.283,550,590 $31,789,680 $ $1.315,340,270 r r Section 4- Page 1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report L Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review U For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Operating Budget Review L 2000-01 Yeali Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Data Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Lr Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) $ 31,046,000 $13,781,195 $ 17,264,805 44.39% Connection Fees 4.459,000 2,652,905 1.806,095 59.50% Other Fees 65,541,000 25,338,440 40,202,560 38.66% Sale of Capacity Rights 2,856,200 - 2.856,200 - W Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 28,312,000 19,995,735 8,316,265 70.63% Total Revenues $ 132,214,200 $61.768,275 $ 70,445,925 46.72% u OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 56,987,000 $18,803,374 $ 38,183,626 33.00% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 15,843,000 9.917,491 5,925,509 62.60% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 37,735,000 21,453,494 16,281,606 56.85% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 40,742,200 20.708,329 20,033,871 50.83% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 7,876.000 4,149,991 3,726,009 52.69% Total Outlays $ 159,183,200 $75,032,679 $ 84,150.521 47.14% W Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance W 07101100 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 23,952,851 $ 9,917,491 $ - $ 33,870,342 L Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 78,487.024 18,803.374 97.290,398 Sub-Total 102A39,875 28,720,865 131,160,740 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 7,535,709 - - 7,535,709 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 281,103,225 - - 281103,225 v Treatment Facilities 518,081.821 - - 518:081,821 Disposal Facilities 77,803,069 - - 77,B03,069 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 96,584,044 96,584,044 Sub-Total 981,107,868 981,107,868 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,083,547,743 $28,720,865 $ - $1,112,268,608 4.1 L �I Section 4-Page 2 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 M, Operating Budget Review 200MI Year-To Remaining Year-To-Dab Budget Dale Budget %of Budget d REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,458,000 $ 1,414,963 $ 2,043.037 40.92% Connection Fees 364,000 691,971 (327,971) 190.10% y Other Fees 8,717,000 2,630.102 6.086,898 30.17% Sale of Capacity Rights 320.900 - 320,900 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2.166.000 1.820,325 335,675 84.43% Total Revenues $ 15,015,900 $ 6,557.361 $ 8.458.539 43.67% OUTLAYS: rW Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 6,960.000 $ 2295.432 $ 4,664,568 3298% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 1,123,000 69.334 1,053,666 6.17% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2.840.000 1,5N,204 1,270,796 55.25% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,038,800 Z303293 1,735,507 57.03% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 1.451.000 762,729 688271 52.57% Total Outlays $ 16,412,800 $ 6.999.992 $ 9,412.808 42.65% Capital Facilities Budget Review a Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101100 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131/00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,566,448 $ 69,334 $ - $ 1,635,782 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 8.314,562 2,295,432 10,609.994 Sub-Total 9.881.010 2.364.766 - 12,245,776 PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): ee Land and Property Rights 2,354,394 - 2,354.394 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46.622.800 - - 46,622.800 Treatment Facilities 63.242.673 - - 63,242,673 Disposal Facilities 9,497.554 - - 9.497,554 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 11.416.179 M 11,416.179 Sub-Total 133.133.600 133,133,600 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $143.014,610 $ 2.364,766 $ $145.379,376 Section 4-Page 3 2000-01 Mid-Year Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review v For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2000 Operating Budget Review 2000-01 Year-To. Remaining Year-To-Dad _ Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - $ - $ - NIA Connection Fees - 1.729 (1,729) N/A Other Fees - 3,600 (3,800) N/A � Sale of Capacity Rights 3,163,000 3,163,000 - Interest 8 Miscellaneous Revenue 942,000 240,266 701,734 25.51% — Total Revenues $ 4,105,000 $ 245,595 $ 3,859,405 5.98% r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 2.025,000 $ 679AN $ 1,345,517 33.55% w Collection Activity Capital Improvements 588,000 24,588 563,434 4.18% _ COP Retirement and Interest Expense 162,000 56,276 105,724 34.74% i Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,219,000 660,451 558,549 54.18% w Revenue Area Operating 8 Other Expenses 218,000 147,950 70,050 67.87% Total Outlays $ 4,212,000 $ 1.568,726 $ 2.643,274 37.24% i Y�I Capital Facilities Budget Review y Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01100 8 Additions Fixed Assets 12131100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 1,762 $ 24,566 $ - $ 26,328 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,216,676 679,483 2,895,159 Sub-Total 2,218,438 704.049 - 2,922,487 i mr PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 508,493 - - 508,493 V Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,378,307 - - 29,378,307 Treatment Facilities 18,720,791 - 18,720.791 Disposal Facilities 2,808.228 - - 2808,228 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3,353,980 3:353,980 kd Sub-Total 54,769,799 54,769.799 - Total Property,Plant 8 F-qulpment&CIP $ 58,988,237 $ 704,049 $ $ 57,692,288 �+ .j I V Section 4 -Page 4 u Self Insurance Review r General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 r Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2000-01 Through Through 200041 Through Innate r Budget 1MI120DO 12/31/2000 Budget 12/311199s (Bement 1. Beginning Reserves $1,531,700 $1,809.121 N/A N/A $1.592,701 $ 216.420 a: Rinninues, 2. In-Lieu Premiums 1,246,500 623.250 50% 623,250 375,000 248,250 r 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 50,000 50,317 100.63% (317) 19,120 31,197 4. Allocation from Other Funds 700,000 57,064 8.15% 642,936 62.667 (5,603) r 5. Total Revenues 1,996.500 730,631 36.60% 1,265.869 456,787 273.844 r Expenses 6. Benefits/Clalms 300.000 16,172 5.39% 283,828 11.445 4,727 a 7. Contmdual Services 3,500 S00 17.14% 2,900 300 300 8. Legal Services 500,000 152,974 30.59% 347,026 137,146 15,828 r 9. Professional Services 3,000 4,144 138.13% (1,144) 12,000 (7,856) 10, Supplies&Other 500 - 0.00% 500 - - r 11. Servioe Department Allocation 1,000,000 822,378 82.24% 177,622 176,520 545,858 12. Subtotal Expenses 1,807,000 996,268 55.13% 810,732 337,411 658,857 r 13, Excess Loss Policy 112,000 50,383 44.98% 61,617 27,873 22,510 14. Total Expenses 1,919,000 1,046,651 54.54% 872,349 365,284 681.367 aw 15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 77.500 (316,020) 407.77% 393,520 91,503 (407,523) 16. Ending Reserves $1.809.200 $1.493.101 92.79% N/A 1 884 204 $1791.7031 r r r Section 5-Page 1 r 2000-01 Mid-Year Report Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review For the Six Months Ended December 31,2000 Percent W Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2000-01 Through Through 2000-01 Through Increase Budget 1213112000 12/3112000 Budget 12/31/1999 (Decrease) �u 1. Beginning Reserves $336,600 $302,064 NIA N/A $812,383 $(510.319) Revenues �u 2. In-Lieu Premiums 310.000 155.000 50.00% 155,000 77,500 77.500 - 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 25,000 24,783 99.13% 217 9,836 14,947 V 4. Total Revenues 335,000 179,783 53.67% 155,217 87,336 92,447 L Expenses 5. Benefits/Claims 250,000 220,631 88.25% 29,369 86,567 134,064 6. Contractual Services 25,000 12,500 50.00% 12,500 6,250 6,250 1u 7. Legal Services 30,000 9,004 30.01% 20,99E 5,047 3.957 8. Professional Services 35,000 6,189 17.681/6 28,811 25,636 (19,447) 9. Supplies&Other - - WA - - - 10. Service Deparhnent Allocations 50,000 40.188 80.38% 9,812 61,200 (21,012) rnl 11. Subtotal Expenses 390,000 288,512 73.98% 101,488 184,700 103,812 12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 16,069 71.42% 6,431 5,024 11,045 13. Total Expenses 412,500 304,581 73.84% 107,919 169,724 114,857 I ' u 14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (77,500) 12( 4,798) 161.03% 47,29E 10( 2,388) (22,410) 15. Ending Reserves $259.100 $177.266 68.42% WA $709,995 $(532.729) !u W w Y.I v Section 5-Page 2 - I� Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE General Management Administration(Division 110) Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance Target Through 6 Months Summary of Data Ensure treatment cost does $514/MG $524/MG Total 2000-01 net expenditures of not exceed target by end of $23.672,073 represent 51.46%of the 2000- fiscal year 01 $46 million budget. This percentage is greater than the proportionate expenditures of 50.00%budgeted for the first six months of the year. The$523.74 gallonage charge as of 12/31/00 is$9.34 per million gallons higher than the 2000-01 years budget of $514.40 because net expenditures are 2.92%or$672.073 higher than budget, which is slightly offset by flows being 0.26% higher than budget at 245.64 mgd. Ensure District meets 510 FTEs by and 498.75 FTEs As of l/12/01. Includes outstanding job adopted staffing plan of fiscal year offers. Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. with Permit Compliance Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 46.45% Tracking"Rover first 6-months. Seethe (capital projects)CORF Engineering section for further. Budget by end of year Ensure District Performance 80% 80%Performance Performance objectives have been met during Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives the second quarter. Workplan milestone milestones met within Objectives 65%Workplan tasks are behind in some areas,which has targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see been typical of our mid-year performance over Milestones Summary) the last severe[years. Oftentimes unforeseen technical or administrative difficulties impact milestones but don't impact ultimate deadlines. Total District-Wide Not Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data Tracked Through 6 Months 142 93 37 12 65%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled through 6 months of FY 00/01 were completed. Please see individual division sections for additional details on activities behind schedule. Section 6- Page 1 2000-01 Mid-Year Report F114ANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Administration (Division 210) �+ Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance Target Through Billionths V Summary or Data Average Rate of Return 6.03% 7.41% Target exceeded. on Liquid Portfolio Index 60 Average Rate of Return 11.64% 11.03% Performance fell behind benchmark in first four on Long-term Portfolio months because of an above-Index duration and Index an inverted yield curve. Over the past 12 months index has been exceeded. V Average interest rate paid 3.67% 3.58% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. on variable(COP) borrowing u General liability cost:% Lower Nan target is desirable. Benchmark met. premiums compared to .60% .37% Operating Budget Workers Comp insurance cost: %premiums 1.49% .51% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. compared to payroll W Workplan�Tasks .I 2ntl Quarter . 'u`'Com late; Behind Not > , P Started Summery of±Data 4 4 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. 1 u w v V lr V Section 6-Page 2 u Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting(Division 220) r Performance Objective 200041 Target Performance Through4lMonths Summary of Data Issue monthly financial 92% 100% Target met. r reports within 10 working days FIS OneWorld training 90%End Users 0% Awaiting OneWorld implementation. r program Trained Update cost-allocation 100%by year end In progress This work to be completed in 2n0 and 3rd study quarter. r Complete review of 3,200 100%by year end 35% Will complete by year-end goal. properfies on septic r Workplan Tasks Not .' r 2nd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 4 1 1 One consultant project behind schedule r due to scope of work issues. r r r r r Section 6-Page 3 2000-01 Mid-Year Report W FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) L Performance Objective 2000.01 Performance Summary of Data Target Through 6 Months Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 98.52% 6-month cycle counting program met program Rating benchmark target. 60 Complete by On-target Progam milestones on-target. Develop technical 6101 specification training progmm L Develop procurement card Complete by Complete Complete. metrics 6/01 1 Phase III DART warehouse Complete by On-hold On-hold due to Computerized Maintenance project 6/01 Management System(CMMS)problems. Inventory stocl out program Complete by In-progress Program on schedule. review 6/01 W WorkplanTasks. Not 2nd Quarter comp fete Behind . Started Summary of Data Is l 6 4 0 2 Difficulties weh CMMS software. I II L W �rl I . 1..1 W V Section S-Page 4 - L Lr Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications(Division 310) Performance Objective 2000.01 (Performance Target Through 6.Months Summary of Data . Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target achieved. ,y turnaround time 100%of time Board minute preparation 10 day 100% Target Achieved. turnaround time turnaround 100%of time Photocopying services 93%+ 95% Target achieved. satisfaction r Graphics services 95%+ 99% Target achieved. satisfaction r Visitor tour satisfaction 85%+ 98% Target achieved. rating r Workplan Tasks Not .2nd Quarter ,Complete Behind "Started ' = Summary of Data 3 2 1 0 Behind on purchase of records management software. r r r r r Section 6-Page 5 2000-01 Mid-Year Report HR& EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Divisions 510) Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance Target Through 6 Months :Summary of Data U Achieve mandatory training 98%+ N/A N/A 1°6-months. No mandatory training attendance offered. 6.1 Exceed National 86% 91% 91%of employees received training in first benchmark for% and 2n0 quarter. This%will increase as employees trained/Yr. training continues in subsequent quarters. W Achieve in-house training 5.75+out of 7 6.5 out of 7 Target exceeded. evaluation rating Ensure Department budget 90%-100% 30.8%expended Target met through 6 months. W managed within 90%-100% through 6 mu. of proposed. Ensure Department 90% 83% Target nearly met. Imgrovemenls will be achieves 90%+of encouraged through 3 quarter. performance objectives I Workplan Tasks Not W 2nd Quarter Compiete " Behind Started Summary of Date 4 3 1 0 Compensation and Classification study behind due to rebid. L W W 1 W v W ri U W Section 6-Page 6 - W Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT r Technical Services Administration (Division 610) Performance Objective 2000-01 Target - Performance �' - Through 6 Summary of.Data Months r, Ensure divisions' 85%+ 100% Exceeds benchmark target. performance objectives are met. Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 101%annualized Non-recurring expenses for a few items expenditures are managed made in first hag of fiscal year. r Workplan Tasks "Not r 2nd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. r s r r r d r r Section 6-Page 7 2000-01 Mid-Year Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring(Division 620) 6.i Performance Objective ` 2600-01 Target Performance - Through 6 Summary of Data,' Months Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target meL core ocean monitoring sampling Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met. reports/data submitted on time Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met. L reported on time. - .Workplan Tasks Not 2ndQuarter Complete Behind Started. 'Summary of Data 6 4 2 0 Biosolids management plan and ocean monitoring database behind schedule due I to various factors. W W Vv VJ I 7Vr W W IJ W Section 6-Page 8 u Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT ee' Environmental Sciences Laboratory(Division 630) .Performance Objective - 2000-01 Performance Target Through 6 Months :Summary of Data - Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 109.6%overall lab Target met. testing productivity at/above Multi-agency benchmark parameters. Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 3 of 4 sections Due to Huntington Beach Investigation testing productivity within norm achieved norm: workload,productivity standard not achieved 10%of FY 99/00 in-house Microbiology-74% in Microbiology. productivity,standard. Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 95+/o/100% Target met on laboratory samples 1s' analysis' 100%on 2 a r Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 95%average(89%- Target met. analyses established 98%range is 6 mo.) norm r �r Workplan Tasks Not 2nd Quarter Complete Behind. Started> Summary of Data 3 3 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. r r r Section 6-Page 9 2000-01 Mid-Year Report W TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control(Division 640) Performance Objective ` .2000-01 Performance Target Through 6Months Summary of,Data "I Maintain field Inspection 2.7 monitoring 2.7 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods data is for 1st quarter of FV 00/01. r' Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. 1 actions within 30 days of non-compliance event W Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prlor to expiration W Evaluate SAWPA 100%on-Ome 100%completed Targets met. pretreatment program Complete revisions to 100%by 6/01 100%milestones met Milestone targets met. Wastewater Discharge Regulations l Develop pretreatment O&M 100%by 6/01 100%milestones met Milestone targets met. W training program i.i Workplan Tasks Not,. 2nd.Quarter Complete Behind StarteJt� Summaryiof bafati Ir 2 2 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. L, W W W W w Section 6-Page 10 I ' W Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Safety&Emergency Response(Division 650) Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance .. Target Through 6 Months Summary of Data Achieve 100%attendance 100% 95% Make-up training being offered to .. for mandatory safety absentees. training Ensure Injury Incidence is 8.5 incidence 7.4 Target met. 24%below industry rate average Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 3.9 Target nearly met. Significant Incidence Rate 42%below rate improvement over 1°quarter results. industry average Workers Compensation $403 $103 Injuries that occurred did not have Cost Factor 30%below significant medical casts. industry average Workplan Tasks Not r 2nd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 1 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. m r Section 6-Page 11 2000-01 Mid-Year Report W ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Division 71101720•) Performance Objective " 2000-01:- Performance Target; Through 6 Months. Summary of Data Manage Capital Projects 80%+ 46.45%through 6 $28.3 mil spent versus$60.94 CORP Budget expended by months CORF/Collections system budget. On-track. years end Staff Utilization Rate for 70%+of lime 77% Target met. Project Managers u Meet design project 80%+of time 73% Approaches target benchmark as 46163 milestones project milestones completed. Meet Division 710f720f730 Less than 53.8%for Div 710 Target met for first 6 months. W JO budgets 100% 47.7%for Div 720 expended 45.2%for Div 730 46.8%overall Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% Target met. correspondence within 30 working days W W Workplan Tasks .Not 2ndQuarter complete Behind - 'Started "Summary of Data j 11 6 5 0 Some internal opembons improvement Ir projects behind schedule. 'Note that Engineering Adam. and Planning&Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes. W 1.1 u W W W V W Section 6-Page 12 u Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 'r Construction Management(Division 730) Performance Objective 2000-0? Performance Summary of Data Target Through 6 Months Target Change Order costs 5% 4.21% Change order costs are always based on a r at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four original contract amount quarters. Target has been met. (industry standard=7.25%) r Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 64%-90 days Target met. Occupancy in facilities days 36%-240 days within targets 40%-within 240 days Conduct Quality Control 8%or less 4% Target has been exceeded based on OC Inspections and average no Inspections. more 8%correctable deficiencies Staff Utilization Rate for 75%+of time 84% Target has been exceeded. Project Managers for CIP r Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 94% Target has been exceeded. within date identified greater 'N)orkplan Tasks 4nd Quarter ` Comp/ate Behind Started '. S'' me ' of!'Data 8 6 2 0 Two organizational Improvement projects r behind schedule. r r Section 6-Page 13 2000-01 Mid-Year Report L OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Administration(Division 810) W Performance Objective- 2000-01 Performance. Target Through 6 Months Summary of Data W Ensure Operations $385/million $381/million gallons Target met. treatment cost per million gallons treated treated V gallons does not exceed target Ensure O&M division 96-100% 105% (annualized) Annualized target near budgeted W budget's managed within expenditures. Increase in energy costs is appropriated expenditures impacting budget. Ensure Total Injury 12.2 8.85 Target met. Frequency remains below (or less) W Industry average Ensure staffing plan figures 252.75 FTEs by 248.5 FTEs Target met. am met end of year I v Workplan Tasks NoN 2nd Quarter Complete •behind- Started< Summary of Data 'Lo 2 z o 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. jl W I W L I W W W V W L Section 6- Page 14 l W Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT r Operations&Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 820i870•) Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance - Target, Through Months Summary of Data Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100% Total wntracts Natural gas units are twice the amount ,r biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 121%for expected. Ferric chloride bids were higher contracts are managed 6-month period than expected. within budget (annualized). Ensure milestones are 80%+of time 100% Project milestones met. completed on assigned projects Respond to Engineering 90%within 100% Target met. Capital Project Review deadline Requests Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.40 Target met. kilowatt hour($/kWh) Maintain therms/kWh at A11 therms/kWh .106 therms/kWh- Within targeted parameters. Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 (kilowatt hour)within .106 therns/kWh .112therns/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2 Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 78.6% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit Central Generation plants requirements. within targeted limits Workplan:Tasks Not ' '2nd Quarter complete Behind Started-" ' Summary of Date 7 4 1 2 Delays in two projects it,.to upper management directive. r 'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. r r Section 6-Page 15 2000-01 Mid-Year Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 830/840) w Performance Objective 2000-01 Target Performance Through 6 Summary of Data Months .- Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 73%Plant 1 Target met. v Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 71%Plant 2 Process Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 45%>at Plant 1 41.4%Plant 1 Problems related to Pl trickling (BOD)Removal Targets in Primary 43%>at Plant 2 41%Plant 2 filter process areas impacting Ir Treatment Process performance. Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 16.3%Plant 1 Higher than expected at P2 due total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 40%Plant 2 to lower than authorized targets 5 hours leave staling levels. taken) 25%at Plant 2 61 Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 5.2%Plant i Costs nearing maximum does not exceed targets salary 5.9%Plant 2 benchmark at P2. W Work-plan Tasks Not u 2nd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 4 2 2 0 Two projects behind related to establishing additional standards u and protocols. w it u u W W u w Section 6-Page 16 w Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions(Divisions 8501860) Performance Objective 2000-01 Target Performance. '. Through 6Months Summary of Date Ensure 45%Wrench Time 45% 48.3% Target met. In Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 45%Wrench Time 45% 61% Target met. in Electrical& Instrumentation Division Ensure 55%Wrench 55% 57% r TlmelDirect Support Time See above. in Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 55%Wrench 55% 64.7% See above. Time/Direct Support Time in Electrical& Instrumentation Division r Ensure preventive <90% 72% Target met. maintenance backlog in Mechanical Maintenance is less than 90% Ensure preventive -90% 33% Target met. maintenance backlog in Electrical&Instrumentation is less than 90% Workplan Tasks Not .. 2nd Quarter � ' complete Behind Started 'Summary of Oats 12 9 3 0 Internal projects related to reinvention and J42 have been delayed. r Section 6- Page 17 2000-01 Mid-Year Report w OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Air Quality&Special Projects(Division 880) u Performance.Objective 2000-01 .- Perfovnance Through ' Target'' --6 Months Summary of Data Meet air quality regulatory 100%of lime 100% Performance objective is on target. deadlines 1.+ Ensure collections sulfide 80-100% On-track Currently tracking property through 8 control managed within months. budget iw Ensure PSNcontraclual 80-100% On-track Curren8y tracking property through 6 services managed within months. budget W Woikplan Tasks Not 2nd Quarter Complete ` Behind Started ` Summary of Data 3 2 1 0 Biosolids project slightly behind schedule. 61 IW W la LI I-r W W W IW tw Section 6-Page 18 W Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT FacilitiesiCollections Divisions(4201430`) Performance.Objective 2000-01 Target Performance - ` `Through 6 - Summary of Data Months+ r Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 81% Target met. Pump Stations meets or exceeds target Ensure that collections 90%+spots 93% Staff diverted to CIP-related tasks. trouble spots are cleaned on maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 55% Change in the way data is captured compared Fleet Maintenance Division to benchmark target based on old data meets or exceeds target collection method. Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 53% co Change in the way data is captured mpared Rebuild Shop meets or to benchmark target based on old data exceeds target collection method. Ensure planned/preventive 70%Planned& 45%Preventive Change in the way data is captured compared maintenance to corrective Preventive 55%Corrective to benchmark target based on old data maintenance reties meets Maintenance collection method. targets 30%Corrective Maintenance r Workplan Tasks Not 2nd Quarter Complete ' Behin"d Started ' Summary of Data'." r 6 5 1 0 Delays on task due to direction from upper management. 'Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes. r Section 6-Page 19 2000-01 Mid-Year Report L INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT(Divisions 910193019401950") L Performance Objective 2000-01 Performance Target Through 6 Months Summary of Data L Desktop obsolescence Replace 25%of On-target Target met. program computers V annually Database "Up-time" 95%+ 99.86% Target met Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met. i"'( "Up-time- plants 100%=Plant2 I 6w Workplan Tasks Not 2nd Quarter Complete Behind Started - Summary of Data u 10 5 2 3 Some internal project delayed due to resource issues. 'Note that Informa0on Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. L W V V L L 1 V V Section 6-Page 20 L' Orange County Sanitation District (714 ) 962-2411 www • ocsd • com mailing address : P • O . Box 8127 Fountain Valley , California 92728-8127 street address : 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley , California 92708-7018 OCSD 12/31/00