Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-12-20
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 13, 2000 penny Kyle 2 copies no label) Board Secretary ,pure: (714)962-2411 NOTICE OF MEETING mallpm address: P.O.Box 8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT sm+ee address: 1 .,tgnllValley.CA Avenue Fountain WEDNESDAY, December 20, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. V sz7oeaBla DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue A....is. Fountain Valley, California 92708 • titles The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Anshglm District will be held at the above location, time and date. era. Buena Park Gypross Fountain ✓elegy V p/ Fullerton Burden Grove Hundogton Beech and Secret Irvine Le Peters Le Palle Les Alamitos Newport Beech Grange Platens Santa Ana Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Begs Beach Beentan Tustin Villa Park mree Linde County or orange JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, December 18, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. Sanitary Districts @OCWD Costa Mesa JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Midway Gry SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE • Tuesday, January 2, 2001 at 11:00 a.m. Water Dlatrlaea @OCWD Irvine Ranch JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Tuesday,January 9, 2001 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, January 24, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. "Maintaining WaHilZass Leadership,n Wastewater and Water Resource Managemeor ' nm BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 June June 27, 2001 July 'July 18, 2001 August August 23, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November November 28, 2001 December 'December 19, 2001 *Meetings; are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:Uvp.dla\ntlMhTVA9entla\2Wo Healing Nofio WN12.2. o SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 20, 2000—7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. a. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Irvine Beth Krom Mike Ward La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian• Los Alamitos Alice B. Jempsa' Arthur DeBolt Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill Stanton Brian Donahue Bill Estrada Yorba Linda John Gullixson Michael Duvall Costa Mesa Sanitary District James M. Ferryman Adene Schafer Midway City Sanitary District Joy L. Neugebauer Grace Epperson b. Consideration of motion to receive and file written communication from the City of Newport Beach re appointment of Tod Ridgeway for the December 20, 2000 meeting only. RWrp.dlaragendalBcard Agendas@000 Board Agendask122000supplemental,doc /Z/J,L/Oc� /•�� yj6� A, Groundwater Replenishment System December 20, 2000 Boards of Directors Orange County Water District Orange County Sanitation District Subject: Postponement of"Go/No-Go" Decision for the Groundwater Replenishment System At the December 18 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) meeting, we recommended delaying the "go/no-go" decision on final design and construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System for two months, from January 24. 2001, to March 28, 2001. There are two reasons for this recommendation: • First, the Financial Impact Study has not been completed to the satisfaction of the Water District. In order to continue providing the lowest well water Replenishment Assessment (RA) possible, the Water District is studying ways to restructure existing debt. While that work is nearly done, there would not be enough time for the groundwater users (producers) to evaluate projected increases in the RA. • Second, as of this writing, new incoming Sanitation District directors have yet to be appointed by their cities. We believe these new directors should have adequate time to evaluate the Groundwater Replenishment System project and review background material. We apologize for the delay, but believe it was a prudent recommendation. We hope you will agree to again hold a joint OCSD/OCWD Board meeting on Wednesday night, March 28, at 6:30 p.m. in the Sanitation District's Boardroom. In the meantime, if you have any questions on the Groundwater Replenishment System, Tom Dawes at (714) 378-3205 would be glad to address them. Very truly yours, W w_ William R. Mills Jr. Blake P. Anderson General Manager General Manager Orange County Water District Orange County Sanitation District bh 1:1DocumentWdv PlnVe\GWRBWroI DevLLellenS200DSGM Ur b BOD 12-20-0O.AW Ain t efron or d.e Orange Caunry Wier Dnvm and die O,ange Camry Sammonn Drsuia (714) 378-3200 • Fax (714) 378-3381 - 10500 Ellis Avenue - Foun[ain Valley - California 92708 DEC-20-2000 11:13 W00DR1FF SPRPDLIN SNP.RT �414 BM 4487 P'02/04 CALIF0101A ASSOCIATION of SANIWION AGENCIES -e l:: 4 9YJL9YR48ul�ii60 eacunmmo.CAY81- rbl:(9167 A66•®IB-FAX 0161 VA4" f July S,2000 AtL(NEE F,nnEaM the Honorable Gray Davis E..ko mmk IA06ru° Guvenac, Smk of Calfficanls ken mmaw SracCapitol Ui1m°rdteptam S6R®mm,CA 95$14 j pqutaurA_m_m — - - rnaWm Dear Governor Davis: I . IM Califonia rLA906'IndDn oFSmdmtioo Aeetlames ICSpeC[fnlJy xegttttm our fi on SB 1559 by Senator Kell which will allow an 1a6it se:wsro Y �� eY. rnzt�m9 v6!-Jw inflation adjustment on Directors,coopeasatim for sanitary and smuMrd,°„ sanitation district officials comparable to water agencies and other simlfm MOVE wrier type agetwies. MW DI.Nelram. ni. ,566IXmiwrgMri:rb Hl In the odd 1950's,mast water and sewer agencin truzied taws adjnsfing A.6"CAWW (owe^s-umo compensation for agency Daccmrs,as they bad pefiodieafly done over the i no n"511 years. The provisions mad adjusted compensation for the varioas water i v vn.W- agencies contained language alloviag the apes to increase the Dmxtms' compensation by tip to five percent(S°/6)per y=,by 1)bdn ordinance. �] '^YwAFun` The sanitary end sanitation district's laws did act eaamia an I= ad vstmeat vision and,as a result of WMW haw fa11eA d. The prMnAr:.N,' J pro on, behind. last adjustment was made in 199& SA 1559 will allow the water agencies' PrA6crDMsnrtAe4a provisions to also be applicable w sanitary and saturation districts. yorwcotalt w Specifically,sanitary and saturation districts,by ordinance,may int ttse E. awev=union Dirw ms'cuiitplm4ahon in as amotmr not to exceed five petcenj(51A)per auaEomwrAtrN year since the last adjustment Vaweaara:..l5.niem. notrw Iasi year,you olljeeMd to our incresvng the number of meeting�eys to s LVAU 10. We have risp=cd your wish=and are leaving the currem law 11man;R Li,.l M. regarding the number of days(6)for which compensation is allowed. Pdl.rinn C: nuulAgm Thank you for yaw consideration. m t'at°.sMiaai. Uuulu:Junulbn I: O(C.W/AJTrrN Siftollal prated'-rrc AYlaerc F'S iuowara,u¢. , 1 Anna.cAvc.,u.w. *MF. on jAz,wL;Er.tY: iM,Mwr Ay�ir.lmlu.m® 714 035 7787 F.03!04 DEC-20-2000 11:13 WoDDRUFF SPRP.DLIN g�WRT ' '- SENATK LOCAL GOVMLVMIT Comxr Y'RR Ramat" Ricbard K. Rainey, chairman I BILL No: SB 3559 HEARING• 4/5/00 ADTBDR: Kelley FISCAL: No VHRSION: 2117/00 CONSULTANT: Detwiler COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A SA rMRY DISTRICTS BOARD SOMERS' COMPBBSATION Background__mod EXIstinng Law _ _ . . ...... .... ._—.. —. _. -- -As creatures of statute. California's 3,400 special _ . _di,skrieta looA to state-laws for their duties and powers, including the mount of campeaeatien that they can pay to their governing boards. Most of the state laws governing special districts allow their board members to receive stipends, ewpenaes, and benefits but net regular salaries. In. the early 19800 districts repeatedly sought legislation to boost the amount of their per diem payments to keep pace with rapid inflation. Tired Of cuecasaive bills, the Legislature allpwed 10 different types of water districts to inerease their board members' Stipends above $100 a meeting, provided that a governing board boated its pay by referendable ordinance. The Legislature also declared its intent •that any future increase in compensation received by members of the governinS board of a water district be authorized by an ordinance ? and act by an act of the Legislature° (AS 1370, Ayala, 1984) . County sanitation districts and sanitary districts boards of directors can receive per disc payments but they cannot exceed eiz meetings, a asmth and cannot exceed $100 a meeting. The Legialature has pot raised the 8100 limit I since 2956 (SB 1844, Mecorguodale, 1986) . County sanitation districts and Sanitary districts want to be able to raise their stipends the came way as water districts. Proposed Law Senate Bill 1559 allows county sanitation districts sanitary districts to raise the amount of the stip dl to board membere for meetings if they act by refeY lF ordinances, following the ew;ating procedures for water SB 1559 -- 7/17/00 -- page 1 farUC:VWOMOWS1Thmp0Dmy ineeNnet FileAsenco»ilurd 0713 MOM 714 535 7787 P.04/04 DEC-20-2000 11:13 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN SMART m districts. _1��t1I_ 1. Gsote and HAPk Pet 19 yearn, the Legislature has Crusted nearly a thousand slater districts to net their own atipendn for attending governing board meetinga, provided that they act in public by adopting rsfcrendeble ordinances. That practice fult111nd the Legislature', 1904 intent to avoid repeated bills that incrementally lifted the statutory cape oa Water districta' per diem payments. Bn 1559 assigns this Raze duty and benefit to the otatere 94 county sanitation diatriotn and the 77 sanitary districts. what's good for the goose in good for the gander. _ Z_ 1�¢om do you t' 7 Since 1904, the Legislature has refeYred to tzust„water-districto-..elected bsardu and. the - -' ' �vigilanee of their local vaterninstead of passing bills in - 5aeramebto to raise local per diem payments. That practice And sow sB 1559 beg rho qusetios: who is better prepared to monitor local officials. pay? Can legislators trust, local voters to keep an eye on their elected officials, or should the Legislature keep districts on a abort statutory leash? 3. Last Year's veto Govezmr Gray Davie vetoed. SO 631 IAelley, 1999) because -it in not appropriate to eliminate the six day per calendar mouth restrietiva.' But the Governor did act object to allowing district board members to raise their stipends by roferendable ordiances. This year's bill responds to the abjection by keeping the six days a month limit on the books. 4. Pel.tod 1� on spell. 5, the Coawitttc will also hear as 1756 (Benny) Which taisee the statutory limit on eompennation for members of fire protection dletriets' boards. 91{gj ast add OtonsitioR (3/30/) b\,peert California Association of Sanitation Agencies. d�poai ion Unknown. rdC:UC:IwJM0wMTemmrn,vtev ,. TNI-Ne--.-.-w TOTAL P-02 TOTAL P.04 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMLILEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 13, 2000, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 13, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Shawn Boyd John M. Gullixson James W. Silva Shirley McCracken Joy L. Neugebauer STAFF PRESENT: Peer Swan Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager OTHERS PRESENT: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Mike White, Controller Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Greg Mathews,Asst. to the General Manager Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director McCracken was appointed Chair pro tem until the arrival of Vice Chair Director Leyes. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the November 8, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meetings. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting .t Page 2 December 13, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager, Blake Anderson, reported on the Kern County ordinance the District had challenged in court. The judge ruled against the District on all counts. The attorneys representing the three POTW plaintiffs (OCSD, LACSD and City of Los Angeles) are recommending an appeal be filed but no decision has been made yet. He further reported that Kings County is also considering an ordinance of the same type that Kem County has adopted which would eventually ban Class B biosolids. It was also reported that Chairman Eckenrode,Andrei loan of our staff and Blake met with the General Manager and Chairman of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) regarding the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) and the costs involved with that relocation. SAWPA does not have the funds to pay for their approximate 75% share of the relocation costs, and does not anticipate raising their rates to help offset the costs. SAWPA has asked the District to delay construction of the project for at least one year and encouraged the District to find state and federal funding for the project. SAWPA indicated they would provide the District with help in securing the funds. Mr. Anderson reminded the Directors of the Legislators' Day luncheon for our Orange County legislators from Sacramento and Washington, D.C. It will be held at the District on Thursday, December 14, to discuss various water issues such as urban runoff, watershed protection, regulatory issues and the groundwater replenishment system. All Directors were encouraged to attend. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance had no report. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. (9) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, reported the District hired a new public information coordinator, Sonja Wassgre, who would begin employment after the holidays. Ms. Lawson also reported a request for information had been received from The Register for expenses from the last three years for all directors and the two top managers. The seven directors and two staff members who had expenses that were provided to the Register reporter have been notified. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. v Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 December 13, 2000 (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. FAHROO-91: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2000. b. FAHR00-92: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHROO-93: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of November 27. 2000. d. FAHR00-94: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. e. FAHR00-95: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00- amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a)through (a) under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR00-96: Approve the 2001-02 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommendation. b. FAHR0O-97: Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize staff to conduct a competitive selection process and enter into a Reserve Fund Investment Agreement in order to maximize security, yield and liquidity. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors, and to have staff briefly assess whether there is an actual need to do this; to have the FAHR Committee involved in the preselection interview process and to bring this back to the FAHR Committee in one year to compare results with the PIMCO managed investment portfolios. C. FAHR00-98: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-14, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Board of Directors' Compensation, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 98-3. Motion: A substitute motion was moved and seconded to approve the Ordinance to include reimbursement for a maximum of ten meetings per month. The motion failed by a vote of four nays, two ayes, and one abstention. The Ordinance, as written, was then moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors, by a vote of five ayes and two nays. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ,N Page 4 December 13, 2000 (13) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHROD-99: Analysis of City of Anaheim Treasurer's comments re Quarterly Investment Management Program Report No report was given as the staff report was sufficient. b. FAHROD-100: Compensation & Classification Study No report was given as the staff report was sufficient. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for February 14, 2001 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by: ,/J� i3O /N( Penny M. Ky FAHR Com tee Secrets M�'�'OCbYptleFNIgkNIR9AJ44N1 MN 131Yp FNFNM/d2 ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: December 20, 2000 TIME: 7:00 P.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................� (FLORY) .......................... BANKHFAD................... ✓ ✓ — (LARSON) ....................... BOYD........................... ✓ ✓ _ (CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. V— — (ESTRADA) ..................... DONAHUE.....................�, cv _ (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... _f� — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... ✓ ✓ — (DUVALL)..........................GUL-LIMS(M.................. �L — (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... V — (WARD)............................ KROM........................ CL, f — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ _ (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... 1� — (vacant) ............................ MC GUIGAN.................. ✓ — (vacant) ............................ MOORE........................ (vacant) ............................ MURPHY...................... — — (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. �G — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON.............. ... — (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY..................... ... �G — (vacant) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... — (POTTS)........................... $A6TAR€661------............ — — (vacant) ............................ SIGLER......................... L/ G — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... — — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... Gi — STAFF: Anderson p Ghirelli Kyle Lawson ✓ Ludwin Miles Ooten ✓ Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 12/20/00 H1wp.dlatadmintBSOIRECTOR%Direotom Roll Call.doe SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 19 l,2Dlf.D0c) BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) S (j� v(T ko T1i o 0 HAWRDTFWOMINMVFORM OGWIN FORM.D REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 1 [] V AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . ./�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOMEADDRESS: (number/street) Hyv%4 - Eck C2� . (city/zip code) ty7 TELEPHONE: �v- I O t -7 REPRESENTING: �\ `- ( t/ Z e n S (self/name of organization) i WadwWatal Wp.dl mWBSTORMNtequeal to Speak.dw EQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL ER�ISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL ItITEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMM CEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE D ff E ED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MI TES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. Lit.)_� NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) �L' 6, (city/zip code) r` TELEPHONE: I CT �nn S REPRESENTING: )bo 6 0—, 01,VCA, 1 "qu it lQ -- (self/name of organization) H:W p.dtebdmiMBSf0RMSUtequest to Speskdm /V / EOUE$W0O ADDRESS HE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. k7 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: ZZLf (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: S (self/name of ganization) H1wpAtMadmiMBSTORMSRequeet to Speak.dw 16—A) R�QUESTTQO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALLPERSONS WSH0N T(YAIDDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. p DATE: 2 74 � AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . .�rT�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) 10 U(,-Lk Ko lgTtio'- HOME ADDRESS: l0 2O M to V I s-oT (number/street) Sctz B t� ga74o -S��t2 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 5'�2.-`}30 249 REPRESENTING: dA (self/name of anization) H1wP.dtaWm1ntBST0RMSVtequeet to Spmk.dw STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for theRegular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on ,�/��Pii�G� 7i), 20aq was duly -posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on A1204eci IV, 20et) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this_Z_�1'6ay of FiJariLCG , , 20,,Y6 Penny M. Ky , Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District �` 1\RADON\DATA?\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 13, 2000 Pass.: 171419B2-2411 To the Chair and Members :n.wre.dd...: of the Board of Directors P.O. Box 8127 Pouneain valley,ca Subject: Board Letter 9272E-8127 a[reae add:.u: 1 rt Ellis Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional rLYnE92 08Val-7 18 92]OB-�01B information on any of the items, please call me. Proposed Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Reaulation Delayed Manager Agencies The US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)was expected to publish the • proposed Sanitary Sewer Overflow(SSO)regulation in mid-October. However, Cities according to the publication Inside EPA, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)and the EPA have failed to reach a consensus on the proposed regulation. AnghgM Inside EPA Observers say the delay is likely to continue due to the standoff in the Bume Perk presidential election as well as unresolved disagreements over fundamental issues, cyP...a such as cost-benefit projections and management and operation issues governing F°°"` .u°ay F SSOs. According to Inside EPA, the publication of the proposed SSO regulation n vie gn agree, Grove could be delayed until next year. Huntington Beech Irvine Le Nebre This is another in a series of delays associated with the proposed regulation. EPA L. Pern. submitted the SSO regulations to OMB at the end of March 2000 (for what was Los Mantua. Newport Beath to be a 90-day review by OMB). The SSO regulations contain specific language orange covering satellite collection systems and capacity, management, operation and Pigsg . Sams A. maintenance programs (Cleo These provisions will have far-reaching impacts on Seg1 eggsh the sewer systems owned and operated by the Sanitation District and its member s'a"LO" agencies. Staff is working on a white paper on the proposed regulations that will be Tustin vin. Pan: presented to the Board of Directors in March of next year. Yorba Linde County of Orange AMSA's 2001 Winter Conference Sanitary Districts Managing Utility Infrastructure is the subject of AMSA's 2001 Winter Conference, Coats Mean scheduled for January 30— February 2, 2001 at the U.S. Grant Hotel in San Diego. Mdway cxY This conference will focus on both the management and financial challenges facing Water Di.ermt, public water and wastewater utilities—as well as the opportunities for real cost savings that exist through practices like asset management. With operations, o-wne R.noh rehabilitation, replacement and expansion needs all on the table, and new legislative and regulatory initiatives in the works in Washington, everyone's approach to managing utilities must be reexamined. A conference agenda and registration materials will be in the mail from AMSA shortly. It will also be available online at www.amsa-cleanwater.org in mid-November. -Mantocov,g WoNtlLlaex Leederehi,,n W....ter and Water Resource Menggemgoo Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 December 13, 2000 If you are interested in attending, contact Jean Tappan at 714 593-7101 no later than January 5, 2001. Citizen Advisory Committee for Odor Identification and Control Meets The citizens advisory committee for odor identification and control met on November 14, 2000 at Plant 2 in Huntington Beach. This was the third of a series of ongoing meetings to address odor issues in and around treatment plant with the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association and the West Newport Beach Association. The committee members received a briefing on the results of residential surveys conducted during August 2000, where residents were asked describe odors they experienced during that month and to record the time and date. The surveys helped staff to identify where fugitive odors were originating and begin implementing corrective measures. Based on the residential surveys, it was determined that the scrubbers, in addition to other fugitive odors inside the plant and at trunk lines leading to Plant 2, were the sources of odor complaints. One of the District's capital projects is installing automation controls to help better adjust chemical doses in the scrubbers. With automation, chemical dosage can be adjusted according to actual needs rather than set manually according to anticipated needs. In addition to the automation of the scrubber chemicals, staff is evaluating the benefits and costs of increasing chemical treatment in the collection system. Potential benefits would be reducing the amount of chemicals required at the treatment plants, reducing the number of odor complaints received from the collection system and significantly reducing future costs associated with corrosion of sewer pipes and manholes. The citizens advisory committee process has worked very well in learning about and making plans for the resolution of odor issues around our facilities and refining the odor complaint process. In addition to regular progress meetings, the committee members and staff communicate through e-mail and telephone calls to address odor complaints. Conference on Orange County's Coastal Crisis Included in the attachments is an announcement on this conference that will be held Tuesday, January 16, 2001 at Cal State Fullerton's Ruby Gerontology Center. If you are interested In attending, please call the number on the flyer. Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 December 13, 2000 Statewide Biosolids General Order On August 17 the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)adopted the statewide General Order biosolids permit and certified the environmental impact report(EIR)that is very supportive of land application of biosolids. As expected, the Central and South Delta Water Agencies and Kern County have filed a lawsuit challenging the adequacy of the EIR. The California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA)is considering intervening on behalf of the SWRCB. Kings County Biosolids Update Kings County is considering a biosolids ordinance. On November 21 the Kings County Board of Supervisors (Board)held a public meeting to consider the ordinance. After listening to three hours of contentious public testimony from numerous residents, environmentalists, farmers, scientist, and few supporters, including District's staff, of proposed ordinance, the Board decided it needed more time to study the issue. The Board once again addressed the biosolids ordinance at their December 5 meeting. During this meeting a distinct division became evident among the four Supervisors (one Supervisor had to recuse himself due to a conflict of interest). Chairperson of the Board Alene Taylor requested additional time to review scientific information and receive public comment. District's staff provided additional information to the Board. A meeting occurred on December 12 to provide Kings County staff with direction on how to prepare the final ordinance. The four supervisors voted unanimously to direct staff to draft an ordinance that bans Class B biosolids (with certain limited exceptions)in two years. The issue will return to the supervisors at a future meeting for final determination. Articles from the December 6 and the December 13,2000 Fresno Bee are attached for your review Kern County Biosolids Update Tulare County Superior Court Judge Paul Vortmann, affirming his preliminary decision of last August,found that Kern County complied with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in all respects during the development of its biosolids ordinance. The issue specifically addressed by the court was the claim by the District and several other plaintiffs that Kern County should have prepared an environmental impact report before adopting the ordinance because alternative sludge disposal options have potentially significant environmental impacts. og, Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 December 13, 2000 The judge has yet to rule on other aspects of the case related to the validity of the ordinance including whether the Kem County Board of Supervisors violated interstate commerce laws and improperly imposed impact fees in approving its ordinance. The plaintiffs have not decided whether to appeal the court's ruling which would be filed in the 5th District Court of Appeals in Fresno. Appointments to Water Boards Attached are two articles on water board appointments. The first is on the three appointments to the CA Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, and the second on the impacts on the water boards because of a lack of members. Water Environment Research Foundation's Annual Report The Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF)continues to provide subscribers in the water quality community, like the Sanitation District, with sound and detailed research. We have recently received WERF's 1999-2000 Annual Report, which summarizes its work. Watersheds and TMDLs, biosolids and residuals, utility competitiveness, and water reclamation and reuse: These are just some of the issues on which they are concentrating their efforts. Part of W ERF's promise to subscribers is a commitment to bring the benefits of its research proactively to its subscribers and to welcome wide-spread participation. They have provided us with executive summaries for several new WERF final reports, including: • Membrane Technology: An Innovative Alternative in Wastewater Treatment • A Review and Needs Survey of Wastewater Treatment Plant Early Warning Devices • Developing and Implementing a Performance Measurement System: Volume I • and, Estimating Plant-available Nitrogen in Biosolids. Key Sanitation District staff have been provided with copies of these summaries for their information and evaluation. Although no one can accurately predict the future, it's important for any organization to remain aware of the trends and needs of the industry it serves. WERF has used surveys, assessment research and workshops to stay in tune with its subscribers in the water quality industry, like us,over the past 11 years. This work, which has typically focused on a relatively close time horizon—up to five years—served WERF and its community well in the early years and will continue to be used in the future. r Members of the Board of Directors Page 5 December 13, 2000 However, the water quality industry is capital-intensive, with a planning horizon of at least 10 years. Moreover, the industry is going through a period of rapid change as a result of competition, automation, large new capital needs, and alterations in regulatory requirements. A five-year research horizon is no longer adequate. In order to better meet the long-term needs of subscribers,W ERF has undertaken an ongoing strategic planning exercise. W ERF included some of the best minds from utilities, industry, academia, and corporate circles, supplemented with leaders from government and agriculture, sociologists, economists, environmental activists, and others for this effort. The Sanitation District participated. W ERF intends to play a leadership role in shaping the future of our industry through research that meets the needs of subscribers. While some areas of research may be undertaken by others, more funds, clearly will be needed for W ERF to continue to make progress toward desirable outcomes. They will be looking for support from agencies like us in that effort. Tiered Retail Water Rates I have attached a copy of a letter dated November 1, 2000 to the Bureau of Reclamation from OCW D and MW DOC requesting funding for the development of a computer model for tiered retail water rates for use by local agencies. The Sanitation District is participating in this study as part of the GW RS program. Storm Water Discharges Measure by California State Assembly Members Harman and Bates Assembly Members Tom Harman and Patricia Bates have introduced a measure relating to storm water discharges. AS 15 would require the state board to provide grants to public local agencies to pay for capital costs and specified other costs associated with diverting dry weather flows from storm water discharges, or reducing or eliminating dry weather flows from storm water discharges, or both,which flows would otherwise be discharged to a public beach. The bill would also require a public local agency, in connection with the preparation of a grant application, to consult with the sewage treatment facility that will receive the diverted flows. At this time, the funding in AB 15 is not specified. Odor Complaints Attached is a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Members of the Board of Directors Page 6 December 13, 2000 Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt J:,W PWC1G.ORMO=LT W BDLTR KI Attachments AMSA's 2001 Winter Conference,Managing Utility Infrastructure, will focus ;09 Utility CO9 4yf on both the management and financial challenges facing public water and FO G wastewater utilities—as well as the opportunities that exist for real cost savings rr through practices like asset management. With operations, rehabilitation, i replacement and expansion needs all on the table, and new legislative and A regulatory initiatives in the works in Washington, our whole approach to r n managing our utilities must be reexamined. The agenda for the conference C. p has been crafted to examine both managing our underground infrastructure and managing our organizational infrastructure. co��13a F 1 ,goo` ccvo MANAGING OUR UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE yar e6ruarY Vista This essential conference for public utilities begins with a look ahead of the choices ey Son Diego,Co and challenges we face as we consider the state and future of our invaluable underground infrastructure. House Water Resources & Environment Subcommittee Chair and Co-Chair of the Congressional Water Infrastructure Caucus Rep. Sherwood Boehlert IR-N.Y.) has said, "the time for the federal govern- ment to step up to the plate on water infrastructure financing is rapidly approaching" AMSA has invited Chairman Boehlert to keynote the conference with a focus on Funding the Future of Our Underground Infrastructure and provide attendees with an insider's view of initiatives in Washington. The conference will continue with an in-depth look at managing our infrastructure assets. A provocative panel discussion will examine the reasons, rationale and requirements behind asset management — and provide an overview of new re- sources under development to assist public agencies in managing their assets to minimize costs and maximize performance. A second panel, Underground Infrastructure. ..'Out of Sight...Out ofMmd'No More will showcase the experiences of agencies and organizations who hove undertaken aggressive asset management initiatives. MANAGING OUR ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE The conference will explore organizational infrastructure — with a look at how we manage and lead our organizations. Through a keynote address and a sneak preview of a unique educational offering, the second day of the conference is sure to be a value-added experience. In his keynote address, Speaking the Language of Leadership—Aligning&Motivating High Performance Teams&Organiza- tions, Mark Walton, former CNN Correspondent & Anchor and Founding Director of the Program on Leadership Communi- cation at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill) will offer his expertise in the fields of communica- tion, leadership and organizational development. Through real-world experiences and proven strategies, Walton will prepare conference attendees to manage even the most complex communications challenges. The morning session will conclude with an in-depth look at the Water& Wastewater Utilities Leadership Center. The Center,housed at the Kenan- Flogler Business School at UNC-Chapel Hill, is nearing its national debut and will offer a truly unique educational opportunity to both seasoned and emerging leaders within your organization. NBP's ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SET FOR NATIONAL DEBUT The focus then shifts from organizational management to environmental management when the National Biosolids Partner- ship INBPI debuts its Environmental Management System for Biosolids[EMS). The NBP's new tool for improving an agency's environmental performance and gaining public acceptance will be examined during a wide-ranging discussion focusing on the EMS Blueprint, the Notional Manual of Good Practice and 3°Party Verification. The national launch will conclude with a roundtable featuring perspectives of several charter communities who are currently implementing the EMS. As a prelude, Friday morning's Keynote Address will provide the opportunity to hear from an agency that has instituted an organization-wide EMS—setting its sights well beyond biosolids practices and focusing on all agency functions. AMSA COMMITTEES TO MEET All of AMSA's special committees will meet during the conference, keeping atterdees up-to-date on ongoing and emerging regulatory and legislative issues from total maximum daily loads to WATER21. Legislative and regulatory strategy discus. sions will be pivotal and committee members and interested individuals are urged to attend. Mark your calendar for AMSA's 2007 Winter Conference —January 30 - February 2, 2001 Orange County's Coastal Crisis e A conference on "why you should care about beach closures and what causes them. " Tuesday, January 16, 2001 * 8am — 1 :30pm California State University, Fullerton Ruby Gerontology Center Confront the issues on the spoiling of our cherished beaches. Join prominent ecologists, scientists, educators, environmentalists and concerned citizens. Discuss the economic, environmental and political impacts of a problem with countywide implications. Position Papers and Opening Panel Discussion 8:30.9:30 William Fulton, author of "the Reluctant Metropolis" Dr. Michael Hanneman, UC Berkley Economics Dr. Steven Murray, CSUF Biology Orange County League of California Cities, Government Institutions and Beach Pollution Audience Participation in Two Panels: 9:45-10:45 and 11 :00-12:00 Sewage and Beach Closures Mr. Blake Anderson, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District Mr. Larry Paul, Manager, Watershed and Coastal Resources, Orange County Ms. Mary Nichols, Sec. Resources, State of California (invited) Urban Runoff in Beach Closures Dr. Stanley Grant, UCI Civil Engineering Mr. Tim Casey, City Manager, Laguna Niguel (invited) Mr. Scott Gudes, Deputy Sec., U. S. Department of Commerce Lunch and Concluding Wrap-up Session 12:15.1 :30 Sponsored by OC League of Cities, CSUF Center for Public Policy, CSUF Town Hall, the Gas Company and OCBC. For more information please call (714) 278-3521 Or visit our website at www.library.fullerton.ed/oc202O ,toy r sue, FULLERTON fresnobee.com I Undecided Kings Co. supervisor holds the key vote on sewage .. Page 1 of 2 i fresnobee.com The Fresno Bee Undecided Kings Co. supervisor holds the key vote on sewage sludge By Kerri Ginis The Fresno Bee (Published December 6, 2000) Kings County Supervisor Alene Taylor could provide the swing vote when the board decides what type of sewage sludge should be allowed into the county under a proposed ordinance. Taylor is the only supervisor who is undecided about how restrictive the county's ordinance should be. At a board meeting Tuesday, Taylor said she needs more information about the health risks associated with putting sewage sludge on farmland. "You need to look at everything that's available out there before you make that kind of decision," she said to residents at the board meeting. "If you can convince me that there is a health hazard on any level, outside of what the normal risk is, then you're going to get my vote. But where I stand right now, I can't get there." Sludge — or biosolids, the name used by the sanitation districts that produce it— is what's left after waste water is treated at sewage plants. It's rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, and farmers say it adds nutrients to farmland. Critics say it's possibly loaded with heavy metals and disease-causing micro- organisms, which can harm the environment. For the proposed ordinance to pass, three of the four board members must agree on what type of sludge to allow into the county. Supervisors Tony Oliveira and Tony Barba said they want Kings County's ordinance modeled after Kern County's, which only allows highly treated sludge. But Supervisor Joe Neves said he supports the draft ordinance the county has been working on for the past two years, which allows sludge that contains some pathogens. In the past, Taylor said she would support an ordinance regulating the use of all three types of biosolids. hftp://www.fresnobee.com/print/storynews/0,l 737,219122.html,00.html 12/06/2000 fresnobee.com I Undecided Kings Co. supervisor holds the key vote on sewage .. Page [of 2 v Sewage sludge is divided into three categories under federal guidelines: Class B, Class A and Class A EQ, which stands for"exceptional quality." Class B biosolids still have traces of disease-causing micro-organisms such as coliform and salmonella. Class A is heated to kill nearly all of the pathogens, usually by solar drying and composting. EQ is a variation of Class A and means that it is low in heavy-metals content and can be applied to farmland for 100 years with no ill effects on crop production. After listening to hundreds of residents, scientists and experts speak about the health risks associated with using Class A and B biosolids, Taylor said she needs more information before making a decision. "I want to have the information in front of me before I'm willing to take a stand," she said. "I have an open mind, and you have one week to convince me." If the board splits 2-2, then no ordinance is put into place, and farmers will be allowed to continue using sludge that includes some pathogens on their farmland. If Taylor sides with Oliveira and Barba, then the ordinance would ban all types of sewage sludge except "exceptional quality" biosolids. The board is expected to decide what will be included in its ordinance at its meeting Dec. 12. Supervisor Oliveira said after learning that nearly 1,000 farmers and hundreds of residents are opposed to Class A and B biosolids, he decided he could support an ordinance that only has the strictest standards attached to it. Neves said he wants the ordinance to allow for all three types of biosolids because of the cost involved with treating the sludge so it reaches the EQ level. He said it would be left to the taxpayer to cover the expense. "I have a difficult time spending money that in my mind doesn't need to be spent," he said. "I'm just not sure it's worth the extra added cost" The reporter may be contacted at kginis@fresnobee.com or 441-2417. http://www.fresnobee.com/print/storynews/O,l 737,219122.html,00.html 12/06/2000 rresnooee.com I Kings county arans omit on swage use rage i oy i fresnobee.com The Fresno Bee Kings County drafts limit on sludge use By Kerr! Ginis The Fresno Bee (Published December 13, 2000) After months of debating and researching the health risks associated with using sewage sludge as farmland fertilizer, the Kings County Board of Supervisors drafted an ordinance Tuesday banning certain types of the material from the county. The ordinance, which will not be approved until after an environmental review, allows only a highly-treated sludge to be placed on county farmland. It's a move that follows several other counties in the Central San Joaquin Valley, such as Kern and Tulare, that also have banned certain types of sludge. Public outcry prompted the board to begin investigating the issue further after originally drafting an ordinance allowing sludge that still contained some pathogens to be put on county farmland. Sludge, or biosolids, is what's left after waste water is treated at sewage plants. It's classified into three categories: Class B, Class A and Class A EQ, which stands for "exceptional quality". The county's ordinance bans Class B and A, which contain traces of pathogens or disease-causing micro-organisms. The county is only allowing Class A EQ in a compost form, which doesn't contain pathogens and is mixed with green waste to lower the level of heavy metals. Two farmers now use Class B sludge on their land. Under the county's newly drafted ordinance they eventually will have to change the way they do business. The ordinance gives people who already have permits for applying sewage sludge two years to switch to Class A. Within five years, they can only use the "exceptional quality" compost form. The reporter can be reached at kginis@ fresnobee.com or 622-2417. http://www.fresnobee.com/print/storynews/0,1737,221238.html,00.html 12/13/2000 ; . = CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION 0/ SANITATION AGENCIES 0 925 L Street Suite 1400 Sacrameow,CA 4581d TF.t.:(419)4"98_FAX:(916)4484909 MEMORANDUM Ira Facsimile November 29,2000 TO: CASA Executive Board FROM: loan Arneson,Chair,CASA Attorneys Committee Robbi Larson,Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs PAGES: 4 SUBJECTCfIENERFL�ORDER OEDATION REGARDING CASA PARTICIPATION IN SSHALLENGING THE EHI FOR THE STATEWIDE FOR BIOSOLIDS LAND APPLICATION RECOMMENDATION The Attorneys Committee recommends that the Executive Board authorize CASA's intervention in two lawsuits challenging the Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the Biosolids Land Application General Order. If the Board approves CASA's intervention,a Selection Committee appointed by the President will convene to select counsel to mpresent CASA. The Attorneys Committee also recommends that$10,000 be authorized from the Litigation Fund as"seed money"to cover the cost of filing a motion to intervene. BACKGROUND On May 25, 1995,the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB) created a General Order permit for the land application of biosolids. The General Order process was established in order to streamline the biosolids land application permitting process. The CVRWQCB staffprepored a negative declaration. On April 18, 1"6,the State Water Resources Comm]Board(S WRCB)overturned the CVRWQCB's General Order due to non compliance with CFQA,but allowed for the continued application on approximately 50,000 acres that had filed a for a General Order permit on or before April 1, 1996. CASA Executive Board November29,2000 Page 2 On May 17. 1996.a CEQA-based suit was filed by the Central and South Delta Water Agencies in Sacramento Superior Court,seeking to rescind the interim permission for biosolids land application under the General Order granted by the SWRCB unless an Environmental Impact Report(EM)was prepared The Court found that an EIR should have been prepared by the CVRWQCB and that the SWRCB did not have the authority to allow the sites permitted on or before April 1, 1996 to remain in operation without an EIR.The Judge allowed the General Order sites to continue to operate for 90 days_ Turing the 90-day period,putties desiring to kcap the sites permitted had to devise a plan that wuuld satisfy the Judge that there was a strong commitment to the funding of an EIR and a schedule established for the Elk preparation process. In the summer of 1997,Tri-TAC and CASA solicited fiords from member agencies to pay for an EIR on a yet to be developed SWRCB General Order.The SWRCB would be the lead agency for the project_ The lead agency would hire and provide oversight to a consultant firm for the preparation of the EIK The estimated funding required for an EIR was $500,000,with the entire project taking about two years. Over 30 agencies pledged funds. On September 12, 1997,the Corot,satisfied with the funding commitment,allowed for the General Order sites to remain in operation for three years pending the EIR development. The firm of Jones and Stokes was retained under contract,administered by CASA, to prepare the FM Following the release of a draft EIR and numerous opportunities for public comment, the Final EIR and revised Drnft General Order were on June 30,2000. The SWRCB held General Order and EIR Workshops in Santa Clarita on August la and in Sacramento on August 3"of 2000. Though requesting a number of technical revisions, CASA supported adoption of the General Order. On August 17,2000,the SWRCB certified the EIR and adopted the General Order. THE LAWSUITS Two separate lawsuits have been filed in Sacramento Superior Court,challenging the adequacy of the EIR. The Petitioners are the Central Delta Water Agency and Kera Cuunty. Tbc lawsuits claim that rho SWRCB failed to comply with CEQA in certifying the final EIR and adopting the fieneral Order. The Kern County petition alleges that the SWRCB fhiled to consider the potential significant environmental impacts of the interim land application of biosolids,failed to adequately analyze cumulative impacts,and failed to prepare an adequate mitigation and reporting program. CEQA cases are tried on the administrative record. The Central Delta Water Agency case has been assigned to Judge Ronald Roble and the Kern County case to Judge Lloyd Connelly. It is expected that the cases will be consolidated before one of the two judges. The SWRCB estimates that the administrative record will be certified before Christmas,at which time the SWRCB will file its answer to the petition. The Attorney General does not expect the case to be briefed on the merits until the summer of 2001. a CASA Executive Board November 29,2000 Page 3 POTENTIAL CASA INVOLVEMFNT The SWRCB's adoption of a statewide regulation governing biosolids lend application,and its certification of an EIR that is very supportive of Class B land application,is very significant—especially in loday's anti-biosolids climate. The Attorneys Commit ce recommends that CASA become involved in the SIP lawsuit. The Committee discussed whether CASA's involvement should take the form of either intervention or filing of an amicus brief. Intervention would allow greater participation in settlement discussions,as well as offer an opportunity to present the perspective of the regulated community—the true "real party in interest"in this case. Participation as an amicus would also allow CASA to present its perspective,though we would lack the party status requited for participation in settlement discussions. The Attorneys Committee discussed various levels of involvement,from an amicus brief through full intervention. Given the significant investment that CASA members have already made in the Elk(over$550,000 was contributed to its development)and because the General Order is important to many CASA agencies,the Attorneys Committee concluded that an amicus brief would not be sufficient. Also,while CASA and the SWRCB world both defend the adequacy of the FIR,the perspective that CASA would bring as biusolids generators would be somewhat different from the SWRCB's position as regulator. While there is no had and fast rule regarding when a party must intervene,the usual practice is to move to intervene before an answer has been filed in the case. For this reason,if CASA chooses to intervene,a motion should be filed before the end of the year. FUNDING AND SELECTION OF COUNSEL. We estimate that a litigation budget of approx®ately$150,000 will be required. Layne Beroldi,Chair ofthe Land Issues Subcommittee,and Bobbi Larson will identify eight to ten public agencies with a significant interest in land application to contribute to a fund to cover attorney's fees and costs. While contributions from other agencies will be welcome,we are reluctant to"pass the hat"fur another lawsuit,especially in light of the$550,000 already contributed by POT Ws toward preparation ofthe EIR. If the Executive Board approves CASA'S participation in the lawsuit,the new Litigation Policy approved by the Board at the Strategic Planning Retreat calls for the President to appoint a committee to select legal counsel. The Selection Committee will consist of: Rich Luthy(President),Joan Arneson(Attorneys Committee Chair),Bobbi Larson,two members of the Attorneys Committee and a representative of a CASA member agency familiar with the issues in the case. The Committee will prepare a Request for Qualifications to be submitted to at least three(3)law firms for a response. The Selection Committee will discuss the responses from the interested law firms and recommend to the Executive Board an attorney to represent CASA. CASA Executive Board ° November 29,2000 Page 4 This selection provess will necessarily take a few weeks. There is a need to act quickly, however,to intervene. Therefnre,the Attorneys Committee recommends that the law farm of WoodrufE Spmdlin and Smart(which represents the Orange Comity Sanitation District)be authorized to prepare and file a motion to intervene on CASA's behalf and authorize the expenditure of$10,000 from the Litigation Fund as"seed money"to cover the cost of filing the motion. The remainder of the recpnnsibilities in the case will rest with the firm approved by the Executive Board following the selection process. FOR MORE.INFORMATION: Contact Bobbi Larson at the CASA Office(916)446-0399 or Ioan Arneson,Attorneys Committee Chair,at(510)793-9800. u: Mike Dillon,Executive Director Layne Baroldi,Chair,CASA Land Issues Subcommittee GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBERS TO THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATE.. Page 1 of 2 a OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR A00:272 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 19,2000 GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBERS TO THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SACRAMENTO—Governor Gray Davis today announced the appointments of F.M. Ameri,Frank Williams,and John Withers as members of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Mr. Ameri,60,of Newport Beach,is the senior vice president of RBF Consulting,a planning,civil engineering,and land surveying company. In 1992,the Orange County Board of Supervisors appointed Mr. Ameri to the Development Processing Review Committee,where he has served as the chairman and continues to serve as a member.This Commission oversees all development activities in the county.He earned a bachelor of science degree from California State University,Pomona and a master of science degree from California State University,Long Beach. Mr. Williams,58,of Rancho Cucamonga,is the founder,president, and chairman of the Board of the Housing Action Resource Trust(HART), a non-profit affordable housing provider. HART has assisted 8,000 families achieve homeownership through HART's Down Payment Assistant Program. Mr. Williams is also the executive officer of the Building Industry Association Southern California, Inc.,Baldy View Chapter,which includes San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties.He also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of HomeAid San Bernardino County,which is helping to alleviate the homeless problem in San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties. Mr. Williams also served six terms in the Florida House of Representatives.He was the recipient of the 1998 Farr Housing Award from the Fair Housing Council of San Bernardino County and served five years on the California Architects Board. Mr. Withers,44, is the chairman of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. He also serves as senior project manager for development for Lewis Operating Corp. Prior to joining Lewis, he served as project director for PSOMAS and Associates,a civil engineering firm.Mr.Withers' community service includes serving as the Director of the Irvine Ranch Water District, Commissioner of the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission, and Director of the National Water Research Institute.He earned a bachelor of arts degree from the University of California,Los Angeles and a master of arts degree from Occidental College. Members do not receive a salary.These positions require Senate confirmation. #N# http://www.govemor.ca.gov/briefing/pressreleases/nov00/a002721119.html 11/20/2000 Draught of Appointees Plagues Water Boards" y, ■The regional eBVlrOBmentil agencies alesometlmef MaboeN,seess.ONythe Central Santa Am and Los Angeim Intends at Nast Bee afflrvmtiva rates to Valley and San FYandWo bonds bad to sasrel meetings.The San pen Some bmNa smeld regelre a unable mast becaw they lack enough meniffm. are hued to sapeelty after Dave' Diego board mlasC a annotate kiss nearly muNmolas sate to ps an ?�^ Govemor'S office says It wants to chooseieHght people. a Aida mynn governor Is trying CColorado RiverBasinn rreeggionnal. lagreement.And bblovee,bibfbhamed to stalks a hataaee a.he appoints hoard,respredble far trying to eaHked Inv¢augetsapNluter, Yet Ivcomplete',boards are the _ If ` Bmya U� rule,notlMemeptlay. �rs to the unpaid four-yam cheen and ,audention inghemmMm. .der to embooL .fine,a bond sale -1 r rot NYom ors pror�pee�1 I[aP • d. •The gtverem le very aware mlaedaaveml mrotlngnlkatyam Board saltic.,do not M bear, M recent edeaol]]uvbmaP uwan the Baca edhlNMtim tees that the Proton;b?e,eansed leaven anddhio ynr,mled lhetimid tbst yond a elm pas meeting supentl� pNetvevts bYiiay.CmyWWem hean.eore dellb5oloathe aP with ruDls wtl boards.end W. bete to Arai We Tahoe esghbe an demand t ]changed ip r' mood that Be Ml¢'ewalmquWty Poatmmlprdwa'I said Kurt Bar•' �° ' ho;Ne will Move enamh labNe b for lee 9a�nW Are bW WBe� �:es he eftemryfiardbastasqalsky eaM wb11P$atlN6 9udlly alms and W�ecmrbentiout l0 Meetloga hold meetings Vert month--Mum Quality Control Bond. '11,be. PatO�a to the banana,"eats Boom TTPamm laRweek,the Idly rea- eyMf;dayltlpg effah;that can bil putbmely,PatNgUe bomnethst that aamaa; into being more Salagh.dfaftyQrtreeeldefa0 V eon maa of the based.still teemNWwotNml. if ptaym Increasingly trimmest role. thorough.r know au the appoint via had yumuma wen hem en most of Board members most read 0,, N the sate N danger of being uP mesa wave gotten have bon as- Untla DeNe,eatewaNrofgNW the vnaMrre whom lemma aspired through thick volumm of material a bletocmrymlkeyfmNtlons. rw V ham taken tone,stands against Sal.m agreed b Rer for tiro ad- and dO reaeWh become thofP av�ifo abaencear n- arm n Al least Bve gova+aOraPWated pollutes Citim Move hem ordered dubmal months,sold John Bober- or m een afim delveInalmum ihstere"de boWmemb ' imlhapreustfm to stop sandbar urban run.B Into ten,nowwve ofB rntFtho'gin'm- into esl i'.M?r+hn saw.NR sf intereetaacNVNemaNem ameeoag of a vole an anlw¢. waterway., and unprecedented egoaeglaWbowl Vale on parading epvhonmm with the water boards,wNeh have Boards have a cem4ty of nine Bassfor eeaege m01.hove been There are other patimtW povR solemn s'hryvatempmNite bl recently herons the Mdl doge of mambas,Bow .ere.if stem- lei lameaas atedwBh,"Imirvhya randTtl2ymmiepoVt�. water gmnldty erdoroement,after been snow asp when factors eauld "[Darla]has been very dellber- complete board water of@lal. Th rim me of this mleal.4. years of being endRud a.weak endanger sate;ant .gal.. OnBl ate on this proaeas;'M.said. Wei.pfveNty of Inlamla and a- re,ulrea ysuch thought before' entl IneBMust. naRly. board members .on. "But the resins speak for them- pertleaareamangthea. Putting a beerd together,Bahama; m The domain these wataranelato themmlvm from a vote B there's a eaves." "pheboerdlodeelgnedm bees and. m mat pretest a immerse,Ncludlng smv0alorNlmeaL Inthepgattwo yore,the Noilh rmgedrepmamtetlmL"&rohbld 'It noted be orgy fen the gayer- E come of Ne buclats.m of Cream- The San aego.bomn;the North cunt Berdimel WatmQoallty Cao- sed&"I yyaudon't.have au the nsrtohuetpakmmmaaalehaL" na's Identity:the AclBc dean, Carat board N Bases Rana and the tin BOW InSevta Rom mimed slants Nlm,Yam don't here the full he said."Bat foh bid,the pfNrltyls- I"' lakeTahae.the wish San.M. WhontsnboatslnIhTahce mnmlmeed.0 bemoaned.look to have quality peoplefortheapgs III eve only tla manbere;the Santa of,mman.Emllen tha year,the ': Gilablilbn,mme awes remdte Md.pa' J1OJ Oiecfora 0/Iken PHILIP L ANTHONY IRV PICKLER WES BANNISTER * PiealCeef KATHRYN L.BARR LAWRENCE P.KRAEMER JR. n, � FNaf Vke PreaNea JAN M.FLORY _ - JOHN V.FONLEY JOHN V FONLEY — Secant vim PresHmf JERRY A.KING ;^�• xI LAWRENCE P.KRAEMER JR. ='F V WILLIAM R.MILLS JR. Genaef Mene9er THOMAS E.LUTZ CLARK IDE IRV PICKLER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Genaaf Counsel KELLY E.ROWE JANICE DUMNT Obhicf Seaaary November 1, 2000 Dennis Wolfe U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation 27710 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92590-2628 Subject: Tiered Retail Water Rates Dear Mr. Wolfe: A few water agencies in Orange County have successfully implemented water budget based tiered retail water rate structures. Tiered retail water rates directly encourage water users to practice water conservation and have been shown to be very effective. Tiered rates allow agencies to comply with Best Management Practice (BMP) Number 11, Conservative Based Pricing. Recent studies have document landscape water use savings in the range of 23-35% after implementing this BMP. This system also allows agencies to target high water users for further conservation efforts. Unfortunately, it is perceived by some retail water entities that implementing such a system could result in loss of revenue to the water agency or city. Specially developed modeling software would show that tiered rate structures could be implemented to improve water use efficiency without loss of revenue to the water agency. The Orange County Water District (OCWD), Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) are participating in the funding of a contract with A&N Technical Services Inc. to develop a computer mode( for use by local retail agencies. The software would have the capability to model: P.O. Box 83D0,Fountain Valley CA 92728-8300 • 10500 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Telephone(714)378-3200 Fax(714)3783373 Web Page www.ocwd.c m Dennis Wolfe November 1, 2000 Page 2 of 2 • Changes in water use based on existing empirical data and a sampling of customer meters with historical water use • Changes in revenue flow using an agency's fixed and variable costs, and fixed and commodity charges to provide revenue stability • Changes in total revenues when making adjustments to rates and rate structure tiers using "what if?" scenarios The estimated cost of the work is $40,000. This budget would provide for software development and revisions, staff training, and technical support. The proposal is attached. We are requesting your consideration to assist in funding this work in the amount of $16,000. The remaining four local agencies would equally share the remaining cost as shown below. Funding Partner Potential Amount OCWD $6,000 MWDOC $6,000 OCSD $6,000 MWD $6,000 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation $16,000 Total Cost of Software $40,000 Thank you for your consideration. The Municipal Water District of Orange County would administer the contract. Joe Berg is the project manager and can be reached at (714) 593-5008 if you have any further questions. //Sinc)erely, NL � � � William R. Mills Jr. Stanley E. Sprague General Manager General Manager Orange County Water District Municipal Water District of Orange County I.0ocumanOA&PInUCKV.etle.a Mem IBOR 11-1-00.doc Enclosure cc: Blake Anderson, OCSD Bob Harding, MWD 491, A & N Technical Services, Inc. Draft Scope of Work Increasing Block Rate Model for Design of Conservation Rate Structures Some conservation rate structures entail relatively large changes from an existing rate structure. For example, a shift from declining or uniform rates to a conservation rate structure can imply large increases in water bills for some customers. This can certainly complicate the task of designing innovative rate structures and especially predicting their impacts. This is clearly a place where solid technical analysis can help out. Building on our experience developing empirical tools for water professionals, we propose developing a spreadsheet-based rate design tool to make the consequences of rate alternatives explicit. Project Objectives • Construct a user-friendly, flexible, and analytically robust spreadsheet-based rate model to depict the consequences of large incremental changes from existing rates. The rate model would be transparent, accommodate demand response to price, and allow users to adapt conservation rates to local conditions; • Assist participants to develop coordinated and locally appropriate conservation rate structures; and • Provide technical support for local consideration of rate alternatives. Task Descriptions Task 1: Develop Rate Model. The design process will begin with an elicitation of features desired in rate model software and their relative ranking. We envision this task being performed with the subset of most interested agencies. The resultant spreadsheet based rate model would be structured to: • Design rates for a single retail water agency; • Allow easy use by typical water agency managers; and • Depict the effects of alternative rate designs on water demand and revenue. 1.A A&N Technical Services' will consult with agencies to develop a list of the most important design variables to include in the model (e.g., setting tiers and charges, determining demand and revenues). 1.B A&N Technical Services' will develop the model, coordinating the data collection and input for a sample agency case, and provide documentation and presentation materials that communicate the inputs, methods, and instructions for using the model. 1.0 A&N will then revise the draft based on agency comments and suggestions and prepare a final version for the training session. 839 Second Street, Suite 5 •Encinitas, CA 92024-4462•Voice: 760.942.5149•Fax: 760.942.6853 2450 20^street, suite F•Santa Monica. CA 90405-2716•Voice: 310.581.4025 a Fax: 310.581.4026 Task 2: Technical Assistance. The second task provides technical support to reduce the learning curve for water agency staff to attain a level proficiency and comfort in designing rate alternatives that may differ considerably from existing rate structures. 2.A A&N Technical Services will offer one training session for interested agency staff. The training session will go over the model structure and concepts, data needs and preparation, and how to use the model to design a rate structure. 2.B A&N will also provide a total of up to 16 hours of site visits technical support and follow up for those using the model. Caveats The model will be a policy decision tool, not a financial management system. Although the rate model will incorporate enough detail to depict and show results for the important decisions regarding conservation rate design, it will not substitute for detailed financial analysis needed to implement such rate structures. Within the scope of this contract, A&N will collect and prepare data for a sample case agency, but not for all of the retailers in Orange County. The instructional documentation and training session will cover all the "how-to" steps needed to use the model and to conduct a rate analysis. Timetable (To be Revised) Item Due Date Project start: May 1, 2000 Elicit important decision variables from agencies May 22, 2000 Develop draft model with sample case agency June 26, 2000 Receive comments and revise model July 24, 2000 Training session August 21,2000 Submit final product Sept25, 2000 Budget (continued next page) z #/A & N Technical Services, Inc. Budget: Orange County Conservation Rate Design Model Pekelney Chesnutt Analyst(a) Total Task Hours $125Ihr. Hours $140Ihr. Hours $50Ihr. Hours $/Task 1.A Identify Key Variables 5 $ 625 10 $ 1.400 - $ 15 $ 2,025 1.13 Develop Draft Model 100 $12,600 40 $ 5,600 140 $ 7.000 280 $ 25,100 1.0 Revise Model 20 $ 2,500 10 $ 1,400 20 $ 1,000 50 $ 4,900 2.A Training Session 25 $ 3,125 20 $ 2,800 $ - 45 $ 5,925 2.B Site visits and follow u 8 $ 1.000 8 $ 1,120 $ 16 $ 2,120 otel 158 $19,750 88 $12,320 160 $ 8,000 1406 $ 40,070 839 Second Street, Suite 5 •Encinitas, CA 92024-4452 a Voice: 760.942.5149•Fax: 760.942.6853 2450 20^Street,Suite F• Sent.Monica, CA 90405-2715•Voice: 310.581.4025•Fez: 310.581.4026 Date: November 6,2000 Orange County Saniblion District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2000 __________________________________________"-_"'____________ PLANT NO.1 gg Jan If Feb If Mar d Ad, 1e Mav If Jun 11 Jul If Aun If Sao 11 Oct 11 Nov If Dee If MO Mo Y18 no 729 s Y10 11a1 no 29 rent ni Total: 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 —DRYNO, ------------------------------------------------------ PLANT NO.2 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar I I Apr I I Mar, e$ Jun 11 Jul 11 AW If Sep Oct If Nov I 1 Doc r$ 0 no Y4 s 420 no Y9 6113 s 7/21 s BI11 no 9/3 no 10/ti s 11/5 s Y10 9 E17 no MT s 5127 a Y13 s 124 no 8116 s Y11 no 1020 a 2118 a 429 rM fi127 9 ]/3e s W15 no W12 no 1021 S 2/1a no 5129 7130 PS Yi] We W17 no f022 a Y20 no 720 Me B20 We IW23 s 7/30 PS pbnt hal ]/31 s Total: 0 2 3 1 d 2 6 3 0 5 I Collection Systems Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Doc 113 YB 32 W13 52 Br9 7M W1 8`13 9112 l02 11/13 113 V15 Y8 4I14 YI2 Y19 ]a Blot 6/id 9/18 10/18 11/t3 i— lia 2128 Y15 V18 5115 Y21 ]l12 B/01 8/14 9I19 023 11I18 1/10 428 5118 Y22 ]/28 B/02 6/16 8/22 1121 12S 428 G23 6128 B/03 977 1/27 61 B/30 8m4 8/18 Y30 BIDS 622 Y10 627 Y12 Cdl.: Talal 8 Twat 3 Totel 3 Total 5 Total 7 TWeI 6 Tolel 4 Total 17 Total 4 Tdal 3 Total 4 Tolel RJO:YSH:cbll This spreadsheet does not include In-house odor complaints g:lexcel.dtatorril Complaint Log.xls Orange County Sanitation Districts J30w> ` 6*Q- Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register s �Z BocG — tCe. l Bacteria cramp some Set Beach businesses NEW FOCUS: Offi- tic health threat at one of the cials *ant inland county's more popular wind. surfing and surfing spots.,- cities To take more re- Ifthe bacteria warning cm* s onslbflf for runoff. tmues county health offiatals. P ty might decide m post long-",, , . , . . urban runoffwmvings suchae By OUV#k HAMMON those at barns[ hot' spota:: The Osage County Reghter Newport Hay slid D'afia 1'OIbE" Harbor. Seal Beach business' SEAL BEACH — Health- owners say theyre frustrated, w ssgns to swimmers by the bed reputation forced au- at rs have marked this their beach,and they wem in- city; lk:L 3, the longest land cities to take teSpons�. F posting,!since stricter wa - ility for the nnloff problem. ' toc - testlag standards 'M1Vhea people aren't coming went in effect in July 1999. to the beach and guys-aren't The bears the.bnmt of surfing, it hurls 4U the hoer nmoff dgge pouring out of nesses;' said Robert Howaon, the San ," abriel River at the owner of Harbour SwIlboerds. cmW Alum border.The "Huntington Beach is 86H deal- pslluti especially the,mi- ing with the same image prob., crmcop d—has Increased lem.For us,it's not such a huge ever decades with pop- elation r de It poses a pub- Please see sARERIA Page 0 1 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings �� r Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register �Z� 3UG��rIGv LOCAL NEWS 4 The Orange County Register FROM LOCAL NE BACTERIA FROM t situation,but it does affect us. ; 'The pollution begins inland _ - - -every city along the way con- tributes to what we get here in Seal Beach.As a ante ninity of, - many cities,we have to take on; this problem-not turn a blind' eye." The Orange County Sarri a- tion District tlua spring tb? lished an ad-hoe committee to study diverting storm water CHAS MMV1ERRhe Orange County ReglAer through sewage treatment DIRTY WATER?Heahlrwaming signs have been posted near this plants before it reaches the, spot at the mouth of the San Gabriel River since Oct 3. river-then the ocean.Commit- tee member and Seal Beach Creek every day from inland take responsibility for cutting Councilman Shawn Boyd said cities,"Boyd said"To them ifs their own runoff: Buy bouse- the district has made little pro- not a big issue.What it amounts hold products labeled "non- gress,but they still want to di- to is,can we divert it,and how totdc"whenever possible;use a vert runoff from tributary much will it cost? We've all broom or rake to clean up yard Coyote Creek, which drains come to live with the postings, debris and dispose of it in trash muck from cities such as because people know we're bins; avoid overwatering; and Buena Park and Cypress. looking for solutions." pick up pet waste as soon as Two sewage spills into Boyd and other officials said possible and put it in the trash. Coyote Creek this summer in- they're frustrated inland cities The Orange County HealW creased concern about urban haven't made the issue a pri- Care Agency closed Seal Beach runoff-everything from lawn- ority, despite prelindirwry waters four times this year af- tnower clippings to pet feces- steps to work together on the ter sewage spills. The agency and prompted Seal Beach offs- Sanitation District board and has also posted the high-bamr cials to join a new rivers con- the new rivers conservancy. ria warnings, which means servancy. Seal Beach residents and swimmers may enter the water 'There's 12 million gallons of merchants said they want citi- at thew own risk Bow coming down Coyote tens of every inland city to High levels of bacteria point c�c�oL orange County Sanitation Districts C. 6La16—:7 Newspaper Clippings $og ej- �j�' Name of_leper Section Page # Date I S `CL _�.�/ ub�e/ct 54ri_ �, Z Independent UP FRONT Thursday, November 23, 2000 Study finds 3 .possible causes of ocean bacteria TaHq Malik City, county aad'ebviron, '' and it surpassed nmoff as a shore along currents caused by The city has been rerouting INDEPENDENT men officials gathered Nov; source of the enterococcus AES Corp. The power plant Its urban nmoH through the I6 t discuss the results and and E.call bacteria. uses a pipe the length of the sanitation district for cleansing. MNT'1NGTON BEACH— the next steps to curb further Water birds living in the city pier to collect cold ocean Meanwhile, county and city Scientists have pegged three bacteria contamination. marsh were the major source of water to cool water and dis. officials will monitor the dis- sources of contamination that "The key,issues are really marsh contamination, with charge warm water, which tct's ouffall pipe and the may have led to the closure of the sanitatiofydisuict's outfall bacteria found in the waste may draw in contaminated marsh, and discuss the possi- city and state beaches along and the mar sli,":sald Robed, they produced.' water from the dlstrict's outfaB ble reevaluation of state codes the city's coast last year. Beardsley,the city's directorof, .That could be a real piob- pipe and redirect It up the governing bacteria levels in A yearlong study to find public works; :. lem;^. Beardsley said. .'It the ,city officials said. ocean water. the cause of high bacteria Mary-Annis Skorpanich, a buds are a culprit,what do you - Sanitation districtofficials "The point here Is we know counts in coastal waters iden. watershed malinger with the' do With that?You can'fget rid were a tvtable'for there's something going on tified urban runoff, Talbert Orange CoLnty, Publl¢ of liierrm...It's a salt marsh." and AES officials did not there,and its notcoming from Marsh and Ne.possible later. Facilities and Resoureeb, Sahilation dtshfct officials return phone canals di ay. our city sewer lines or the action between the Orange Department,which hosted the- are also looking Into a theory About $5 coition has been ground water," said Rich County Sanitation District's meeting,said the study found., that their outfati pipe, which ;spent to study the bacteria Bernard, a spokesman for the ocean outfall as the most like- that Talbert Marsh con• dumps partially treated along the Huntingfon Beach city. "We want to use all the Iy culprits of beach closures in tributed bacterial contamma- sewage five mties out to sea, shoreline, about $1.8 million numbers and science we can 1999. don found in urban runoff, may be drifting along the coming from the city. to draw a final conclusion." CALL. Committee suggests reducing sludge - NCTimes.net Page 1 of 2 ��..��� Tod Weather Check The Forecast Previous Story 11 Headlines 11 Next Story Our Best Links What We Do Committee suggests reducing Sludge Keyword Search WYATT HAUPT Jr. search Advanced Staff Writer RIVERSIDE --An advisory committee monitoring the activities of a composting plant in Temescal Canyon recommended Tuesday that the amount of sludge treated at the facility be cut in half because odors coming from the site can't be controlled. But plant officials said they prefer sludge levels remain unchanged because they have reduced the odors emitted during the treatment process and are continuing to develop a plan aimed at alleviating the problem. The Citizens Oversight Committee for the Synagro Technologies Inc. Regional Composting Facility made its recommendation to cut levels of sludge --treated human waste -- from 500 tons to 250 per day to the Board of Supervisors during its weekly meeting in downtown Riverside. The committee was formed by the board in 1996 to address concerns from area residents and business owners about the plant's operations. "It is the committee's belief that Synagro has not demonstrated that it can handle 500 tons of biosolids each day," said Sandy Isom, chairwoman of the oversight committee. The committee, Isom said, also advised the board to consider working with Synagro to relocate the plant to another part of the county and audit records kept by the company on sludge shipped to the site. The board took no immediate action on the committee's proposal. "We request that the board take no action," said Brent McManigal, regional vice president for Synagro. The plant processes about 500 tons of sludge each day and turns it into fertilizer. McManigal told the board that the company is working on a pilot project using an "aerated static pile" to reduce the odors and preliminary findings suggest that it will decrease the smell around the plant. He said UC Riverside professors are reviewing the project that involves flipping the composting piles over to reduce the smell. http://www.nctimes.com/news/111500/oo.html 11/16/2000 l:ommmee suggests reoucing swage - rvt;t imes.net rage z or c Supervisor John Tavaglione said the county and residents near the composting plant have been plagued by the odors for several years and something must be done to eliminate the smell. Tavaglione reiterated his long-standing demand that the company enclose the facility. "We have been hearing nothing but run-around for six years," Tavaglione said. But enclosing the plant is too costly, McManigal said. "We have some (ideas) on the drawing board that are financially (not) feasible," McManigal said. Local resident Diana Schramm said it doesn't matter what the company does to eliminate the smell because it is not working. She said she recently had several guests at her home and the smell was unbearable. I had people literally throw up (because)the odor was so offensive," Schramm said. Contact staff writer Wyatt Haupt Jr. at (909) 676-4315, Ext. 2615, or whaupt@nctimes.com. 11/15/00 Prev_ious_Story 11 Headlines 11 Next Story webmaster@nctimes.com ©1997-2000 North Count Ty Imes editor@nctimes.com http://www.nctimes.com/news/111500/oo.html 11/16/2000 Letters to Editor: It's our water, too rage 1 or 'I . . B R O n CA L 1)D51 W EL L J Want to subscribeResources es Letters to Editor: It's our water, too he SoCal Water Resources News? We cover it all, every day: Water,waste- Sacramento Bee- 11/13/00 water, flood control, and coastal water quality. Siskiyou County Supervisor Kay Bryan, Sacramento Chair, Regional It's treat Council of Rural Counties Water Committee: Re"Gut check for CalFed,"editorial, Oct. 17:The 28-member Regional Council for Rural Visit our subscription page Counties agrees that notable goals have been put forth to solve the at: slate's water problems. But the process has been seriously flawed. http://204.212.225.138/ For instance,we are deeply offended that the plan is proposed "top sowlh2onews/subscribe/ down,"that is federal and state bureaucrats concocting a plan and subscribe.htm giving it to us without consultation or input from stakeholders.We're talking about land use, loss of groundwater and other issues directly Or, simply e-mail the affecting quality of life in the slate's rural counties. QdJ&at kharlow0bome coin with Contrast CalFed,for instance,with the Sacramento Area Water your name,title, and Forum,where all stakeholders were invited on board to study, agency. contribute and find an amicable solution. Because we're smaller doesn't mean we intend to let ourselves get run over by the bureaucrats and big-city types who"tell us what's best for us. V41A1.:1 ` http://bcextra.brwncald.com/socalh2onews/articles/20.../11-13_our_water_too.ht 11/16/2000 _�.. ov.�m.,.R®rmmay.,...,,,m•�..d SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION . �.*.�x'•:..:su:. ww AIEC! COMPU=TECH FRR� PROR F' ASPS Buad Momentum ... FRED Merges Document 4 cling 3D CAD system designed from the Management & the Web ground up for use over the Internet Originally developed an Lockheed Martin,G For Speed and Clarity SDesign is an aerospacegrade CAD sys tem,designed to model ulhxlarge assem- bees as well as managing an almost limn- -- . t took 50 years and over 300 con- ing Standards Board Statement 34(GASB less number of design configurations.The struction projects to create the 34),for example,calls for water and waste- difference is that you rent the software as QWee County Sanitation Districts water utilities to maintain complete and you need it - (OCSD) substantial infrastructure thorough inventories of all capital and Or,for those who are ready to unbur- that includes two 240 MGD wastewater infrastructure assets. Anticipated EPA den all lT weight from their busy lees, treatment plants and 22 pumping stations Capacity, Management, Operation and take a look at Everdream, a company that serve some 2.2 million residents. Maintenance (CMOM) regulations, formed solely to be an affordable out- Managing the mountain of docu- although specific to public waste water coF sourced rr department for small and medi- menu produced from the construction lection systems, are another incentive to umsized offices.Everdream recently part- process was becoming increasingly diffi- organize asset records. online cult Plant information and documents, Thus OCSD embarked on a compre tiered with Bidcom, an online collabom often stored in large file cabinets at various hensive Facility Records and Engineering don provider,to offer a tlon is accessible from B Web vice.-brans ded service locations,were virlually inaccessible,par. Data system, better known as FRED. ticidarly when it came to upgrades and FRED is the cornerstone of a major infor- The Everdream subscription service improvements.New construction projects motion management improvement pro- includes a powerful Intel Pendum III"Self- would begin with a lengthy search gram implemented for OCSD by Brown healing computer-",business application through over 10,000 old project draw- and Caldwell and Computer Facilities software, unlimited Internet access and ings—something that was both inefficient Integration, LC (CF1).The solution was 24/7 guaranteed support By offering a and imprecise,resulting in change orders implemented using the latest in Web- complete,end-toend outsmarted comput- and project delays during construction. based (thin client) software in maximize tng solution,companies raise their produc- With 8%100 million per year in cmi- the interopembility of systems with multi- tivity levels by keeping people performing tat improvements,OCSD need- fandfocuaedontheircorecompetencies— ed better tools not only toman- 1 FRED is the cornerstone of a not troubleshooting their computer sys- age projects, but also to pro- major information management tems. Existing rr staff can supplement vide for future management of _ improvement program their internal resources with Everdream's the assets. uutsourced expertise and service.Already, In addition, new govern- implemented for OCSD by Brown Everdream's customers include large ment regulations focus on �'andCaldwell and Computer . companies such as Web improved tracking of publi cor Builders and a ,m GOvernmemaiAccomcn- e;, Facilitie;_Integration, LLC. Walbridge Aldingem who have Everdream systems installed in jobsite trailers. Everdream customers also include small companies such as Skyline Designs and Built Farm Design & Construction that have outsmarted their IT completely. With these and many more expected z to emerge in the industry in the coming year,confidence in the ASP model should continue to rise. According to ASP C I industry Consortium recent studies: "At Ag� the same time that ASP usage is on the P" rise, customer service continues to P" improve,based upon the respondents'sat- isfaction with thew ASP contacts and the average time it took ASPS to respond to customer support issues" Add to this the increasing complexity and cost of managing an IT infrastructure. and the ASP environment offers a signifi- a�. rant edge to owners like Cabot and the ' construction industry as a whole. ' T . NovemberQ 2OW A-17 a®vmc�amco.--^— SPECIAL.ADVERTISING SECTION ="ss�o-r•_-r..v� AEC COMPUTER TECH (I5F.R PRO FILE: FRED Merges Document Management & the Web... pie data consumers while mininniziog sys lion (i.e..soil-baring locations).This infor- tem maintenance. Client machines only mation inn be sorted,filtered and queried need a standard web browser to access the using a variety of searching tools. Each system, providing a relatively standard object can be queried to return a list of user interface across all applications object-specific adtrbutes.these attributes The cornerstone of OCSD's asset can include construction material,installs- management improvements is the Facility tion project number,common name and a Atlas, a geographic interlace that allows variety of other object specific data users to drill into a map of OCSD facilities For example. a user can choose to to access related documents and data view only the storm drain system. OCSD estimates that the Facility Atlas will Selecting a catch basin returns a list of save over$1.0 million per year that would attributes specific m that catch basin.One be otherwise lost due to less efficient of these attributes is a hot lydc to the access to less accurate asset data EDMS that provides access to project OCSD's director of engineering, drawings and documents that installed or David Ludwin,explains,'The Facility Atlas modified the catch basin. _ will reduce the number of construction Brown and Caldwell used a variety of changeorders due to unforeseen condi- innovative datacaphre methods to create smgcs of implementing the Facility Atlas, tions and will reduce costs by minimizing highly accurate new databases forOCSD's extended overhead associated with time buried utilities and pipe tunnels. Legacy with project completion scheduled for extensions. We conservatively estimate data on buried utilities, for example,was early 2001. For more information on that we will save over$600,000 per year in digitized from over 2,000 paper maps while Brown and Caldwell's asset management extended overhead,and a the same time using puildown tools and a variety of field services, email your ward or contact the Facility Atha will provide major pro- verification techniques to build accuracy information to pflick'Obrwncaid.com. ductivity and quality improvements" into the data In its simplest terms,the Facility Atlas Tunnel-piping data was created using Britain's Channel is a seamles&electronic map of the plant advanced field computers,with automated Tunnel Rail Links It stores process piping.85 types of equip data capture tools as the most efficient and ment (including valves, flow meters, accurate method of building a database for Technology Edge pumps.etc.), surface features,structures, OCSD's 20,000 linear feet of pipe tunnels. Intergraph Civil applications are playing tunnels and a variety of other site informs Brown and Caldwell is in the final pivotal role in the design and construc- tion of:the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL),the £7.6 billion high-speed rail °'••"_�••�v link project between Cmidun's StPanvas � ,. ,e .... Station and the Channel Tunnel terminus t' jr -� at Folkedooie.The CTRL is one of Europe's C'a m•-• i r largest dvil engineering projects and the �+ee•s.�_ „ „3,,,a,s,,,,u first major new railway to be built in =...a.-:o -.az:�--u-. •a a o . a-.-,>- Britain for more than a century. It will be opened in two sections,the CSD first in 2003 between the Channel ��� r=• �— Tunnel and Fawkham Junction where it -- w ra7ltotSS9 will connect with the Railtrack network SITE] I an route to Waterloo International Station. Subsequently,Section Two will = t' GSO _ inn beneath the Thames and through I east London to St Pancras,scheduled for I completion in 2007. _ Intergraph Civil products used on a-•._7 I this effort include InItail for the track, n Infloads for the earthworks and in other ''w,`�t� _ areas such as mitigation earthworks and road earthworks, and SiteWorks For more information about Intergraph pm- +•' '- jects or products, visit www.inter- - - - graph.com. A-/6 November 6,2000 New theory on ocean bacteria tested Page I of 3 community news Home Page m acregister.Com THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH HOME PAGE TODAY'S NEWS ARCHIVES _ AUTOMOTIVE � BUSINESS 8 FINANCE OCJOBFINDER New theory on ocean bacteria CLASSIFIEDS COLUMNS tested COMMUNITY NEWS •TWays stories •Beaches •City Resumes BEACHES: Sanitation District is trying to :come Cloy Evts ents -Crime. determine if sewage from its outfall pipe is getting •EdumWn sucked back toward the shore. Fiewach •Growth •Obituaries November 30, 2000 •Politico&Government -Register In EEuoatlan -Religion By OLIVIA HAWKINSON -Special Features The Orange County Register CRIME.COURTS&LAW EDUCATN ENTERTAINMENT Countyd city officials have spent more than $4 million and FUN&GAMES an y p HEALTH S FITNESS 18 months investigating the mysterious bacteria plaguing LIBERTY ONLINE Huntington Beach waters to reach one frustrating conclusion: LIVING&SHOPPING g g i POLITICS& It's not over yet. GOVERNMENT REALESTATE SCIENCE a A $1.5 million study released Nov. 16 Suggested a familiar TECHNOLOGY culprit-urban runoff-and a new one: the Orange County SERVICES is PROMOTIONS Sanitation District outfall pipe,which dumps 240 million SPORTS&RECREATION gallons of wastewater four miles offshore each day. District TRAVEL officials said they don't buy that hypothesis,but they'll WEATHER investigate as if they do. Microbiologists have started testing coastal waters for evidence that the cooling system at the AES power plant on Pacific Coast Highway at Newland Street may suck bacteria from the outfall pipe back to Huntington State Beach. If the study's theory pans out,the Sanitation District faces a tough choice: build a new outfall pipe,which would cost $170 million, or disinfect the wastewater pumped through the current pipe near the Santa Ana River mouth, which would increase operating costs by$20 million per year. This could boost consumers' utility bills and kill district projects such as a ground-water preservation program. The district pumps sewage through the outfall pipe under an http://www.ocregister.com/community/water0l 130cci8.shtml 11/30/2000 N ew theory on ocean bacteria tested Page 2 of 3 Environmental Protection Agency permit called a 301(h) waiver,which allows less treatment for dissolved oxygen,pH and solids in the wastewater. Goleta and Morro Bay also use the waiver. If Orange County finds the outfall pipe is a main contributor to Huntington Beach's health warnings, the Sanitation District will have to boost treatment for all sewage. In three weeks of water testing,the district hasn't found any evidence of the power plant sucking sewage back to shore, said microbiologist Charles McGee. The district plans to keep testing the water and sediment on the ocean floor,especially in spring when bacteria counts have risen. "There's no evidence to point a finger at the Sanitation District," said Sunny Jiang,a marine microbiologist at the University of California,Irvine,who participated in the study. "The(Sanitation District's)sampling is only once a day.That's part of the reason this hypothesis has not been studied before. I don't think they purposely tried to hide it-they just didn't know. "The district is now paying attention to see if their(sewage) plume is coming back to shore,"Jiang said. "This rang a lot of warning bells for them." Current technology forces a lag of one to three days between the time scientists test the water and the time they tell health officers to post warning signs. Half the time,the signs are posted when the ocean is safe for swimming,the study said. Beach communities across the nation face this problem, said Mary Anne Skorpanich,a county spokeswoman. "We sample in early morning intentionally-to avoid swimmers,who shed bacteria," McGee said. "My guys start testing at 3:30 a.m. Surfers get out there at sunrise. We do think we are protecting human health."Local activists such as Joey Racano have complained about the district's 30-year-old outfall for months, but officials had ruled out the county's largest ocean sewage pipeline as too remote-until now. "We need to drag the county kicking and screaming into the 2lst century," said Racano,a Huntington Beach resident. "You can't have an ocean-based economy and keep dumping waste into the ocean. This is our opportunity to stop and say,'We're overpopulated-what are we going to do with our waste?' " The district's treatment plant in Huntington Beach has been accepting about 2 million gallons of runoff diverted from ocean-bound channels daily-everything from animal feces to lawnmower clippings- on an emergency basis since May. That http://www.ocregister.com/community/water0l 130cci8.shtml 11/30/2000 ry ew meory on ocean nactena testes Page! of 3 too flows out to sea through the outfall pipe,to divert runoff away from beaches. Scientists suspect runoff flushing through Talbert Marsh and the Santa Ana River has played a role in fluctuating ocean bacteria levels. "The study found that overwatering lawns was the biggest dry- season contributor to runoff," Skorpanich said. "That's something people can definitely do something about. There's also other things in there besides bacteria,such as pesticides. If we were preventing it,we wouldn't have to do these diversions." The county will decide next month whether to continue permanent runoff diversions by building inflatable rubber dams in the Santa Ana River and flood-control channels. it newspaper in pangs County.CWHornia You're on your oo�Vwn�en without it. Copyright 2000 The Orange County Register Please send comments to ocmgoterj2linkGeedom mm http://www.ocregister.com/community/water0l 130ccig.shtml 11/30/2000 New tneory on ocean bacteria tested BEACHES: Sanitation trim,"Ba a sunny Jiang, a ma- District is t n to WASTE VOYAGE? rime rtdcrobiolragist at the Uni BEACH WATCH ►A health advhory is Issued g currents could push varsity of California, Irvine, A list of current bacteria- when bacterial levels exceed state - determine if sewage ardtheshore, who participated in the study. related Oman health advisories ssaMards.5wimmeu and Surfers ' from its outfall 'I is might be sucked into "T(re (Sanitation Distriet's) and closures: are urged to stay out of the water P sewagetthe surf zone because of a Sampling is only once a daY - in the ported area. getting sucked back power plains cooling system. That's part of the reason his Beach dos ►The area.is dosed to water. hypothesis has not been stud- contact sports when sewage is rThVettuartq. the Bllore. HUNTINGTON n Present. BEACH led before. I don'[ think they l- Bead updates: purposely tried to hide it-they ITI4)667-3752 NIA HAWKINSON a WS just didn't know. tyks Stry ocregislenawmlweather, County Register m = 8, Adams Are. '"fbe district is now paying x attention to see if their (Sew- s lidCounty and city officials age) plume is cuming back to O er�eates aPower plant }rvoora St. ss shone," n said."Thisrasn a rewpostlng have spent Moro than $a mil- pipes a - gGon and 18 months investigat- \^ seaar. lot of warning bells for them."ing the mysterious bacteria zap ( � Hundnason Current technology forces a nnafg4aflonslilli V Bexh water OssalBea plaguing Huntington Beach miit awuq lag of one to three days be- from the Son Gabriel River Cwaters to reach one frustrating vaalaatio tween the time scientists test breakwa term390fieedroan sagconclusion:It's not over yet. P II the water and[he time they[ell ofthe breakwater. duA$13 million study released ine _ health officers to post warningDana Nov. 16 suggested a familiar - ! si(pns. Half the time, the signs - Hsartlngten Harbors Advisories issuetl forthe Poculprit-urban runoff-and aare posted when the ocen is1 pith Street beach and Sunset Aquatic Marina.new one: the Orange County - safe frar swknming, the 5mdy 'C/Nawpbrl Bay Advisory Issued for 191h Streetbeach. Sanitation District outfall pll'ppee// sad. Beach communities which dumps 290 rtdilion I across the nation face this sagrera Beadu ►tong"4vm postlmgs: Ions of wastewater four 'es nmast blame problem,said Mary Anne Skor- dvisories issued from lifeguardInNewportBaya43rdsuaatlradials lideach theyday.don't briopanich, a County spokeswo- headquarters to 500 feat downcoastto beach,In the 33rd StreetSSIBILITIFS Hotel Laguna and,300 feet of the North. [hannel from 33rd 5treetto hypot said they dm�R buy that snap. AA Crosyshore�.►Wngshore end of Three Arch Bay 3Ah Street and at Harbor hypothesis, but ohey711nvesti- 'M1Ne sample y early morn- arrems currents Maflna at Padflc Coast gate as if they do. tall intentionally - to avoid Ad Bono PWrk Microbiologists Coastal waters Started The orange County Regiser McGee said. "&y guys Advend of Self elfGred for feet of the f Highway . Newport testing Coastal waters for evi- McGee said. a m. guys start end M Salt a Rea County Beath,all g Boulevard. s ) Bence the the cooling system Agency phichacalled s 3 treat- testing at Sat sun surfers get pahany ntareunty Beachanastthrfeet arIn pare Point ul(that Baby Beach � at the AES power plant on Pa- waiver,which allowsless treat- out there at sunrise. We do Wputrana County Blaze;ar Pocheet andh side of the East cific Coast Highway at New- ment for dissolved oxygen,pH think we are protecting human downroartof PONe creek a Pothe Beach. north side of the east Basin. - land Street may suck bacteria and solids In the wastewater. health."Local activists such es source:orange County Health Care Agehry from the outfall pipe back to Goleta and Morro Bay also use Joey Rarano have Complained The Orange County Register Huntington State Beach. the waiver. If orange County about the district's 30-yea-old If the study's theory pans finds the rainfall pipe is a main outfall for months,but officials been accepting about 2 million off," Skorpanich said. "That's out, the Sanitation District contributor to Huntington bad ruled out the county's gallons of runoff diverted from Something people can defi. faces a tough choice: build a Beach's health warnings, the largest ocean sewage pipeline ocean-bound channels daily - nitely do something about new outfall pipe, which would Sanitation District will have to as too remote-until now. everything from animal feces There's also other things in cost $170 million, or disinfect boost treatment for all sewage. "We need to drag the county to lawnmower clippings-on an there besides bacteria,such as the wastewater plumped In three weeks of water test- kicking and screaming into the emergency basis since May. pesticides.If we were prevent- through the current pipe near ing, the district hasn't found 21st century," said Racaro, a That tau flows out to sea ing it, we wouldn't have to do the Santa Ana River mouth, any evidence of the power Huntington Beach resident. tli=ou-g t out pipe,tin - these diversions." which would increase oper- plant sucking Sewage back to 'Tou can't have an ocean- are away 7Tom The county will decide next arming costs by $ZO mihion per shore, said microbiologist based economy and keep heachea. Scientists suspect month whether to continue year.This could boost censum- Charles McGee. The district dumping waste into the ocean. runoff Rushing through Tal- permanent runoff diversions era'utility bills and kill district plans to keep testing the water This is our opportunity to stop bert Marsh and the Santa Ana by building inflatable rubber / : projects such as mound=ova- and sediment on the ocean and say, 'We're overpopulated River has played a role in flue- dams in the Santa Ana River terprese-tVStidn program. floor,especially in spring when -what are we going to do with tuating ocean bacteria levels. and flood-control channels. -The district pumps sewage bacteria counts have risen. our waste? " '"the study found that over- through the outfall pipe under '"there's no evidence to point The district's treatment watering lawns was the biggest ►ohaWracenOwlesheedomnun an Environmental protection a finger at the Sanitation Dis- plant in Huntington Beach has dry-semim contributor to run- ►Call:Mal 445-66H a oP,�D c �rr�tZ SCAPMONTHLY UPDATE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS December 2000 A Message from the Executive Director... Thanksgiving is a cruel holiday. It is. From the appetizers before dinner and all the way through the leftovers consumed days later, it's a veritable four-day bacchanalian food fast. Every year I say that I will exercise moderation and restraint at that table of plenty. I have been known to approach the feast as if it were a battlefield, crafting a plan of attack—"If we eat early, say 2:00, and I pass on the sweet potatoes, cut back on the mashed potatoes and limit myself to one roll, I should be able to have both stuffing and pumpkin pie and still be awake at 4:30 to watch the football games." As for my success in these plans, one need only know that I don't have to be a graduate from West Point to understand that the Pentagon will not be offering me a job as a military, or culinary, tactician anytime soon. Upcoming Meetings So really, what's so bad about consuming a bunch of 6`h Annual Holiday Luncheon, extremely good food over a 96-hour period? Well I'll tell ya. Tuesday, December 5, 12—2 p.m.: It's sitting here on the following Monday morning, in the 97m Once again, the charming El Adobe de hour, with a turkey/gravy breathalyzer reading of .2 and so Capistrano restaurant in San Juan much tryptophan in my system that my eyelids feel like they Capistrano be the setting for the annual belong on some 'ol houndog laying on a front porch in Holiday Luncheon, featuring the San as Louisiana. [Editor's Note: Turkey/gravy breathalyzer? Clemente High School Madrigal singers Hound dog similes? Who did he have dinner with, the well year. This a recap of the events of the pastt s a nice event to bring Beverly Hillbillies?] hose hard wo king staff members to, And now I have to be creative and write something fresh Proposition 13 Request For and stimulating—a worthy follow-up to the brilliant Proposal (RFP) Workshops: thermodynamics column of last month [Editor's Note: December 4, 2000— Loma Linda City Obviously, tryptophan is not the only thing he is full of]. Council Chambers (Start time 10:00 am) Since it is clear that I will not be receiving any help from 25541 Barton Road, Loma Unda, CA 92354 the editorial staff, my thoughts turn Instead to the things The parking lot is directly behind the that I am grateful for, since that is the redeeming value of Chambers and is free of charge. this holiday. I find that there is much to be grateful for as December 5, 2000—Metropolitan we near the 12'h month of the new millennium or the last Wastewater Department Auditorium (Start month of the old one, depending upon your millennial belief time 10:00 am). 9192 Topaz Way, San system. Diego, CA 92123. Parking is free. There is a small lot at the front entrance. I am grateful that this December 31, we won't wonder if Additional parking Is located in back and on the United States will be plunged into chaos and darkness the street. because of computer glitches. It is now clear that only Air Quality Committee— December voting machines in Florida can do that. (Excuse me while 1 18 at LACSD, 10 am — 12 noon. pause here and get a little hanging Chad out of my teeth; there, got it). 30290 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE 113•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675• PHONE:(949)489-7676• FAx:(949)489-0150 Monthly Update 2 December, 2000 I am grateful that the Notre Dame University football team appears headed towards the #3 bowl game in the country after losing two games earlier this season. They remind me that you don't give up because you lose a few. I am more grateful that they beat USC because I can never see that particular phrase in print enough times, and the Income producing potential that I have tapped into betting with Trojan fans is enough for me to investigate producing a late-night infomercial for the get-rich-quick set. I am most grateful, however, for the Board and staff of the State Water Resources Control Board. This is actually no joke. I believe in giving credit where credit is due, and they deserve a big pat on the back for the Proposition 13 grant/loan program that they are putting together. The SWRCB will be distributing a total of$763.9 million of the $1.97 billion of bonds that were sold under Prop 13; $19.8 million has been earmarked for FY 2000-01. They have gone to significant effort to keep Interested parties apprised of their progress on the program, the availability of application forms (Requests for Proposals)and are holding a series of workshops early next month to explain the process. Three funding areas have been identified: Watershed Protection Program ($8,400,000), Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program ($9,200,000)and Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program ($2,200,000). For the most part, 60% of these funds were earmarked In Prop 13 for southern California counties (LA, Orange, Riverside, Ventura, San Diego and San Bernardino). While some of the programs have a matching capital funding component, 20% appears to be the highest amount that a local agency would be required to contribute. A regional approach to proposed projects will be given funding priority. Get those proposals together quickly though, the deadline for submittal is February 1, 2001. The State Board has set up a web site (htto://www.swrcb.ca.aov/orool3/index.html)for the program, and if you haven't visited the site, you should look into it. This program represents an opportunity for our agencies to work together with each other, and other local agencies to proactively address real sources of pollution and clean them up. I say with absolute certainty that our industry has the best and most relevant experience to lead most of these efforts, but we have lacked an equitable funding source—one that is now available through this program. We will follow along with this program, and next month's update will include more specific information about the program as our staff reports back after attending one of the workshops. I am also grateful that for the eight years during which I have had the privilege of serving as your Executive Director. Your contributions, support and the phenomenal brain-trust that exists in our field is, as my granddaughters would say, "really cool." Tryptophaniacally yours, Ray Miller Air Architectural Coatings Testina (Rule 11131 The field testing that was scheduled to begin November 27 was rescheduled to start the week of December 11 due to delays in receiving coatings from some of the manufacturers. Six manufacturers have dropped out of the study due to a lack of product availability. Monthly Update 3 December, 2000 Field test sites at all treatment plants have received their atmospheric test racks; immersion racks are being constructed by LACSD's research department. These racks will hold tests for ferrous metals, wastewater immersion and concrete in vapor spaces. The Coatings Subcommittee has decided to wait until the first status report is issued in April before adding any new coatings. Several agencies have sent in $500 voluntary contributions for this study. The Subcommittee will be negotiating a deduct change order with KTA-Tator for the reduced work represented by the withdrawal of the six manufacturer's coatings from the study. WERF Odor Control Technologies Research Program Underway at LACSD (courtesy rn-rac) LACSD and CH2M Hill are in the first year of a two-year research program to provide a working definition of odors, determine POTWs odor sources, list known odor compounds of concern, provide odor assessment approaches, provide modeling techniques for odor emissions estimating and odor dispersion, and conduct field research on the more promising control technologies. A literature search has been initiated and the team has completed looking at odor-related abstracts from five large databases, and is awaiting further literature from professional organizations, POTWs and consultants. Ultimately, the study will determine optimal control technologies for odors from collection system influent to final effluent discharges, including biosolids processes in the plant. Air Resources Board Set to Improve Heavy-Duty Enalne Incentive Program The California ARB will consider recommendations to revise guidelines for the Carl Moyer Program, the state's incentive grant program that was created as a means to reduce emissions from heavy-duty engines. The incentives are grants that cover the incremental cost of cleaner on-road, off-road, marine, locomotive and stationary agricultural pump engines, as well as forklifts and airport ground support equipment. Beginning in summer 1999, grants became available through participating air pollution control and air quality management districts grants. The incentive program focuses on reducing emissions of smog-forming oxides of nitrogen (NOx), but will also reduce particulate emissions. Improvements in the program include reducing the requirement that NOx emissions for any repower or retrofit project be cut by 30% down to a 15% cut to qualify for funding. An expanded forklift program is also being recommended replacing gasoline powered forklifts with electric. Biosolids Final Decision Issued in Kern County Lawsuit It was lose one and win many in Tulare Judge Paul A. Vortmann's decision that was handed down the day before Thanksgiving. As expected, and based on comments he made when he took certain matters under submission on August 30, the Judge ruled for Kern County and found that Kern's adoption of a negative declaration when they adopted their biosolids ordinance was appropriate and no further environmental documentation is needed. Prospects for an appeal of this decision are under discussion. Monthly Update 4 December, 2000 . On the brighter side, the Judge denied Kern County's cross-petition against the City of Los Angeles and Orange County Sanitation District on 10 other causes of action regarding CEQA compliance by these agencies on extensions to existing sludge contracts and on land where only an option to purchase had been entered into. The judge found that where a programmatic EIR had been conducted for a sludge disposal contract, and the contract was renewed or extended, or a change in ownership of the land occurs, no further CEQA review is required. He also found that the act of entering into an option agreement does not automatically require the buyer to perform a CEQA review prior to actually exercising the option. EPA Issues Guidance for Land Application of Domestic Septage (courtesy Nadouat atosottds Pertaerantal EPA has Issued an internet version (http://biosolids.policy.net/proactive/newsroom)of its Part 503 guidance to assist septic tank pumpers, haulers, and others who apply only domestic septage to non- public contact sites. These sites include agricultural land, forests, and reclamation sites. The document provides reference to Federal rules that govern other alternatives for the use and disposal of septage. In addition, the guidance discusses the relationship of the federal domestic septage regulation to state requirements. AMSA-WEF Respond to NIOSH Hazard ID #10 Report (courtesy Nanooatetosoudsvartoersntot The Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and Water Environment Federation sent a joint letter on 10-31-00 to the National Institute for Occupational Safety& Health requesting clarifications to the Agency's engineering controls recommendations in Hazard ID#10 for Workers Exposed to Class B Biosolids During and After Field Application. Specific areas addressed in the letter include: storage time for dewatered Class B biosolids, soil incorporation, avoidance of mechanical disturbances, key points and description of hazard, and other general concerns over whether the report extends beyond guidance. NBP Accepts 3rd Party Verification Recommendations for Biosolids EMS The National Biosolids Partnership accepted, during W EFTEC in Anaheim, CA on October 16, recommendations from two project steering committees to facilitate implementation of a national model for its environmental management system (EMS)for biosolids. The NBP's Management Committee accepted the independent, third party verification and EMS elements/guidance components that are central to the biosolids blueprint being developed for the wastewater profession. These "interim draft" documents, along with a manual of good practice, include active public participation in the EMS planning and implementation process that will guide the program efforts of 29 demonstration agencies over the next year. WEF/AWWA/CWEA Biosolids Management Conference Set for February 21-24 In San Dleclo Twenty-one technical sessions are scheduled for the conference, including the latest and most innovative practices from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia. Dr. Margaret Maxey of the University of Texas, Austin will address the contradiction between a country in love with recycling, but against biosolids reuse. Early registration by January 19 qualifies for a discount. For further information, visit the WEF website at http://www.wef.orq/pdffiles/Biosolids200l.pd or call Dan Tobin (WEF) at(703) 684-2473. Monthly Update 5 December, 2000 Water Issues SWRCB Approves Ocean Plan Amendments: Delays Decision on New Special Waters The SWRCB considered five proposed amendments to the Ocean Plan at their November 16 meeting. They approved without modification Issue 1: Acute Toxicity Water Quality Objective, 2: Water Quality Objectives, 3: Compliance Determination, 4: Change of Format, and 6: Administrative Changes. For Issue 5: Special Protection For Water Quality And Designated Uses In the Ocean Waters Of California (the issue that SCAP members were the most interested in), everything associated with changes to the existing Areas of Special Biological Significance was approved. However, the Board pulled everything associated with the creation of Outstanding National Resource Waters designation and Outstanding State Resource Waters for further development and reconsideration at a later date. Problems with this issue included concerns that the definitions were not clear(existing/new discharges, etc.), and differences between the two designations were not clear. Questions regarding this issue and the schedule for rehearing should be directed to Bob Languell at (916)341-5588. SWRCB to Review Draft Revised Water Quality Enforcement Policy The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)will hold a hearing on January 9 to seek comments regarding proposed revision of SWRCB Resolution 96-030 (amended by Resolution 97-085) "Water Quality Enforcement Policy." The proposed revision addresses recommendations of the SW RCB's Enforcement Order Review Panel and is intended to promote statewide consistency in enforcement of water quality laws by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards. No decision will be made at the hearing regarding the revision of the Resolution. The SWRCB may also discuss the revision at its March 7, 2001 workshop. It is expected that the SWRCB will consider whether to revise the Resolution at its March 22, 2001 Board meeting. The proposed policy is available for review at the SWRCB or at any of the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards. A copy of the proposed policy can be accessed on the intemet at www.swrcb.ca.gov/plans/policies/ and may also be obtained by calling Dave Althausen at (916) 341-5894. AB982 Public Advisory Group Presents TMDL Program Recommendations to SWRCB Assembly Bill 982 (Ducheny) required the SWRCB to convene an advisory group to assist in the evaluation of the state's TMDL program structure and effectiveness. The advisory group, comprised of state staff, industry and environmental representatives, met several times over the past six months to review the program. The tone of the report presented to the State Board was neutral and emphasized those areas where consensus was achieved, along with briefs by each side expressing their respective opinions. Bobbi Larson of CASA represented POTWs on the Advisory Group and was part of the subcommittee that drafted the report to the Board. The report was for information only and will be considered when the SWRCB prepares its final report to the Legislature. Among those issues where consensus was reached: 1)that the Legislature should provide funding and staffing to the State and Regional Boards to immediate start the development and implementation of high priority TMDLs; 2) that parties contributing legacy sources of pollutants should be held responsible for the cleanup, and that a load allocation for these contributions should be established; and 3)that science Monthly Update 6 December, 2000 . should play a role in the development of TMDLs, but the level of scientific understanding and technical rigor will vary for individual TMDLs. No consensus was reached on issues such as confirmation of impairment, TMDL targets, waste load allocations and load allocations. EPA to Revise Methodoloov for Derivina Health-Based Ambient Water Quality Criteria The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is publishing revisions to the 1980 Ambient Water Quality Criteria National Guidelines. The 1980 Ambient Water Quality Criteria National Guidelines outline the methodology used by states to develop human health water quality criteria. Human health ambient water quality criteria (AWQC) are numeric values limiting the amount of chemicals present In our nation's waters. Water quality criteria are developed by assessing the relationship between pollutants and their effect on human health and the environment. These criteria are used by states and Indian tribes to establish water quality standards and ultimately provide a basis for controlling discharges or releases of pollutants. In 1980, EPA published AWQC for 64 pollutantstpollutant classes and provided a methodology for deriving the criteria. These national guidelines addressed three types of endpoints: noncancer, cancer and organoleptic (taste and odor) effects. Revisions to the 1980 guidelines incorporate scientific advances in key areas such as cancer and non-cancer risk assessments, exposure assessments, and bioaccumulation in fish. It is most likely that the methodology will result in more stringent criteria for bioaocumulatives and generally similar values of nonbioaccumulatives. Non Sequitur I have often regretted my speech, but never my silence. -Anonymous SOAPMONTHLY UPDATE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS November 2000 A Message from the Executive Director... There is a moment that comes to us all, perhaps daily, perhaps not that frequently, but it does come— that moment when mental fog is pushed away, when a blinding light reveals the TRUTH. When God reaches down and flicks on the little light bulb in your head [Editor's Note: He does have a way with redundant phrases, doesn't he]. Hallelujah, brothers and sisters, if the electrical power gurus in California could have hooked up to the megawattage my follically challenged dome was producing - well, you get the Upcoming Meetings picture. It was a Saturday morning and the setting was the 6" Annual Holiday Luncheon, Biosolids Updates and Perspectives workshop at 12 noon— 2 pm on Tuesday, WEFTEC 2000. For those of you who can't imagine why December 5: Once again, the charming one would forsake a couple of hours of Scooby-Doo on El Adobe de Capistrano restaurant in San the telly for a biosolids workshop, well, you obviously Juan Capistrano will be the setting for the don't work in this field and have received this newsletter annual Holiday Luncheon, featuring the San by mistake. The rest of you will want to read on. Clemente High School Madrigal singers as well as a PowerPoint presentation on T CaIRAC. Reservation forms will go out this This workshop had promised to be somewhat week. This makes a nice event to bring interesting, because EPA scientist Dr. David Lewis was those hard working staff members to. going to speak. This would bean opportunity to hear the man whose seemingly sole purpose in life was to wage a "What You Should Know About rather effective campaign to discredit the 503 regulations Negotiating Your Next NPDES Permit" and by inference, the use of biosolids. He looked sort of Sponsored by CASA. Monday, like Daniel in the lion's den, because the rest of the November 13, 2000, Ontario. speakers, and most of the audience, appeared to be rabid For registration information call biosolidmentalists. [Editorial note: we are not responsible CASA is 910 4nform B or all their for the writer's biblical preoccupation or his penchant for [ ] g inventing new words]. website at www.cosaweb.ora and download the registration form. During the past three years, as we've watched Registration deadline is November 7 biosolids earn the "Most scary-substance-that-will-give- and pre-deadline fee is $125.00. me-cancer-that-l-didn't- even-know-that-I-should-be- worrying-about-because-I-thought-those-govemmenl- chareclers-were-looking-out-for-all-of-these-things-and-protecting-me-from-it-besides-it's-really-icky" award [Editorial note: This was a lough competition as it had to beat out MTBE, Chromium 6 and Twinkies], a lot of crackpots leveled outrageous claims against biosolids that were, for the most part, easily refuted. But when Dr. Lewis came along, one of EPA's own, the opposition had a credible spokesman and a story that sounded like a John Grisham novel: Things weren't kosher at EPA. 30290 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD.SUITE 113•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675-PHONE:(949)489-7676•FAX:(949)48M150 Monthly Update 2 November, 2000 Dr. Lewis, who looks like a rather mild-mannered and pleasant fellow (or was on his best behavior) gave a 40-minute presentation about his pending whistleblower case against EPA. As 1 understand his story, he raised a few legitimate questions about some follow-up studies that were supposed to have been done after the 503 regs were adopted, and both he and his supervisor(who supported his questioning), were dealt with in a punitive manner. Dr. Lewis did not take this lying down, and went looking for supporters for his whistleblower case and found them—surprise! —among the biosolids opposition. The problem isn't this guy, or even the opponents of biosolids. Its about superstition and science. It's Murphy's Law v. the Second Law of Thermodynamics. "If anything can go wrong, it will." So it follows that because of a poorly handled personnel issue at the EPA, opponents of biosolids gained a plausible ally and we suffered large setbacks in the beneficial reuse of biosolids. This is where the second law of thermodynamics comes in. You remember. "Energy spontaneously tends to flow only from being concentrated in one place to becoming diffused and spread out." [Editor's note: For those of us who slept through chemistry and physics: a hot frying pan cools down when taken off of the kitchen stove]. In the words of Professor Frank Lambert of Occidental College, the second law is the biggest good and the biggest bad on earth. Because we can concentrate and contain energy (essentially blocking or hindering the second law),we can harness it to produce food, machines, and medicines. Unconfined, however, it can explode, it can wreak havoc with our bodies, it can kill us. "Okay Ray,"you say-sighing because as usual it is a torturous path to get where I'm going—"what was your point?" Here's the light bulb: If Murphy's right, why aren't things always going wrong? Most things actually go right—the vast majority of airplanes don't fall from the sky, biosolids do wonderful things for the earth and most of the time, our Editor doesn't make errors that require embarrassing corrections. But the more important question is: Do we stop flying because a spark in the fuel tank of a plane can cause an explosion? Or do we correct the design error? Of course we do. Why then would we stop the extremely beneficial reuse of biosolids because something will go wrong someday? Will we be a people governed by fear of what might happen, or will we continue to innovate and improve, to keep planes from crashing,to understand the nature of biosolids and soils, to control our weight and to employ the nearly unemployable. Dr. Lewis concluded his presentation by saying that he believes biosolids should be reused, but believes that the process the EPA used to develop the 503 regs was flawed. I understand that this speech was very toned down compared with his Kern County appearance, but he is now on record as to his support for reuse. I'd like to think that Dr. Lewis, after considering the substantial amount of scientific research that went into the 503 regs, as well as the myriad of successful projects and applications that have occurred in the years since 1993. came to the scientific conclusion that this was a beneficial process. However,it is more probable that he has a healthy appreciation of the dynamics of a roomful of uncontained biosolid- mentalists—and the second law, particularly the part about the spontaneous flow of uncontained energy. Thermodynamically yours, Ray Miller Monthly Update 3 November, 2000 Board of Director's Meeting Personnel Committee—The Board considered CONGRATULATIONS! recommendations from the Personnel Committee that SCAP fund The Enema Wastewater Authority the hiring of a part-time clerical position and a full-lime public in Carlsbad won the second-place outreach position. It is estimated that the cost to fund these award from the US EPA for positions, as well as some carryover expenses from FY outstanding operations and 1999/2000, will total approximately$150,000. The Board maintenance of a wastewater approved the inclusion of these two positions in the proposed FY treatment facility for the year 2000. 2001/2002 budget. The award recognized the Finance Committee- Discussion regarding the budget increase agency's compliance with was centered on how to allocate the increase and how to mitigate environmental requirements, the impacts, i.e., whether to have one big dues increase or to innovative and cost-effective spread the dues increase out over a period of years. Following practices,and management of energy the agreement to increase the dues by the City of Los Angeles, consumption. OCSD, LACSD and the City of San Diego by 100%for fiscal year P 2001/2002, the remaining member agencies will be requested to Enema's Board Chairman Matt increase their dues by 50%. This will enable SCAP to fund the Hall and General Manager Mike new positions approved by the Board, maintain the existing Hogan accepted the award on programs and continue to stay on lop of the ever present October 16 et WEFTEC 2000. onslaught of regulation changes, as well as those new ones that are appearing on a regular basis. A letter will be forthcoming to all your fellow SCAP members agencies outlining other option(s) that could be made available. It share in your pleasure and pride at should be noted that this is the first increase in dues in the 8+ years of SCAP's existence. your accomplishment and appreciate the respect and stature that your California Infrastructure—A request was made for funding achievement brings to our industry. contributions from SCAP to support the California Rebuild Well done! America Coalition and its efforts to develop long-term funding mechanisms for infrastructure development and rehabilitation. Board members support CaIRAC, however they were concerned that the budget did not provide funds for this right now, and that SCAP agencies may contribute individually and would be paying again through SCAP. The Board members asked staff to obtain a copy of CaIRAC's PowerPoint presentation and make it available to the membership and encourage member support for the coalition. SCAP Website/Subscription Fees—The SCAP website [http://www.scapl.org]will soon contain the most current as well as back issues of the Monthly Update. Board members feel that the Update is a valuable resource and that staff should examine charging a subscription fee for non-members. The Monthly Update will soon be available by email as well as facsimile; however, mailed copies will be limited. Members interested in receiving the Update via email should forward their address to Kris Whisenhunt at scap@home.com. Monthly Update 4 November, 2000 Air Architectural Coatings Testing (Rule 1113)—KTA-Tator is scheduled to begin testing November 271°. A total of 34 coatings on various substrates (concrete, PVC, steel)will be tested using high VOC and low VOC coatings. Several additional manufacturers are asking to be included in the testing program and the Committee is deciding how to handle this, as they don't want to be perceived as endorsing any particular manufacturer, but rather to see how different formulations perform. Information obtained from the,study will be shared with the SCAQMD. As noted previously, most of the $100,000 cost for the study is being funded by the participating agencies, however smaller SCAP members have been asked to voluntarily contribute $500 per agency,as the information will be beneficial to all agencies. It is anticipated that the funds collected will be used to offset unanticipated costs and/or the overall project cost. _. A final report is due in January 2003; however,four status reports have been scheduled to occur right before public comment periods take place with SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board. AQMD Adopts Fleet Rules For Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Taxis -On October 20, AQMD's Governing Board adopted two measures to begin shifting government fleets of heavy-duty trucks and taxis at airports to alternative fuel and lower-emission models beginning in 2002. The action nearly completes adoption of a series of clean fleet rules for public agencies in the region. AQMD's Board has adopted seven of the eight rules. Rule 1196—Clean On-Road Heavy-Duty Public Fleet Vehicles will require government fleets with 15 or more heavy-duty vehicles to buy altemative-fueled, gasoline powered or dual-fuel models starting July 1, 2002 when new vehicles are purchased. The measure applies to city, county, regional, stale and federal government agencies as well as special districts such as air, water, transit and school districts.Affected agencies now have about 6,900 heavy- duty vehicles in their fleets, which typically include dump trucks, aerial lift trucks and road and highway maintenance vehicles. A fleet operator can apply for a Technical Infeasibility Certification to be exempted from the rule if they can show that an altemative-fueled vehicle is not commercially available, up until 2004 that an alternative fuel station is more than five miles away or the purchase is not as cost-effective as existing state and locally funded diesel replacement programs. In addition, the rule exempts certain specialty vehicles including emergency and rescue trucks. The rule is estimated to cost an average of$10.3 million per year between 2002 and 2015. However, several programs are available to offset the cost of converting heavy-duty vehicles to cleaner fuels.When those funds are factored in, agencies would bear no extra cost in the best-case scenario and about$2 million annually in the most likely scenario. Earlier this year, AQMD's Governing Board adopted feet rules to reduce smog forming and toxic emissions from passenger vehicles, transit buses, refuse trucks and street sweepers in government and some private fleets. (Fam scnavD mesa Meese) Monthly Update 5 November, 2000 No Stage 1 Alerts for SoCal—For the second year in a row,the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area has not had a single Stage 1 ozone episode when air quality is very unhealthy, proving that such ozone levels are a thing of the past. With rainy conditions predicted, Southern California's 2000 smog season has drawn to a close. As of Oct. 26,there had been 40 days of unhealthy air quality when the federal standard for ozone, 0.12 parts per million averaged over one hour, was exceeded.There were 41 unhealthy air days in 1999 and 62 in 1999, reflecting a long-term trend of significantly improved air quality. (From SCADMD pass release.) Biosolids Svnagro Buys BtoGro for$200 Million- Synagro Technologies Inc.announced on August 14 that it had completed the acquisition of the Bio Gro business from Waste Management Inc., for approximately$200 million. Bio Gro, headquartered in Millersville, Md., is a leading provider of organic residuals management services in North America generating approximately$120 million in annual revenues. Bio Gro provides biosolids management services to municipalities and industrial customers through four primary business sectors: land application, thermal drying and pelletizing, composting and dewatering. Founded in 1978, Bio Gro services over 160 contracts for customers in 24 states. These customers include many major cities such as New York City, Baltimore, Charlotte, N.C., Chicago and Los Angeles. Bio Gro has more than 2,200 land application permits and a land base of over 500,000 acres. In addition, Bio Gro operates three of the largest and most advanced thermal drying and pelletizing facilities in the United States. Kings County Still Working on Biosolids Ordinance The Kings County Farm Bureau has announced that they are against the land application of Class B biosolids. The county is looking at establishing a Biosolids Management Zone (BMZ)that would be a specific area designated for Class B biosolids application. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider the ordinance in late October or November. Riverside County to Delay Revisions to Biosolids Ordinance/Endangered Species Lawsuit Settled Riverside County will hold off revising their local ordinance on land application of Class B biosolids pending the implementation of the Statewide General Order. The suit filed by the Endangered Species League against Riverside County about land application near Vail Lake earlier this year, was settled on September 28. From now on, sites that had not been fanned within the last 5 years will require a biological survey before the land application site would be approved by the County. Statewide EIR and General Order Update Both Kern County and the Central Delta Water Agency have filed lawsuits regarding the adequacy of the EIR. CASA needs about$12,000 more to complete the task of copying the EIR to all city and county planning departments. The SW RCB has produced draft Users Manuals for the Regional Boards, but it is likely that finalizing these will take several more weeks. Monthly Update 6 November, 2600 No Decision Yet in Kern County Lawsuit The Judge in the Kern County lawsuit is still considering his temporary ruling, and has not issued a final decision. The decision is anticipated before the end of the year. Water Issues California Ocean Plan The last draft amendments to the COP has resulted in the revitalization of an old group,the California Ocean Dischargers (COD 2000). The group includes a number of SCAP members as well as ocean dischargers from other parts of the stale. The group was formed on an ad hoc basis in order to respond to proposed COP amendments as well as changes to federal ocean discharge water quality criteria. SCAP staff has volunteered to provide administrative support to the group should that become necessary. SCAP is on record as supporting the adoption of the acute toxicity water quality objectives as it allows for the use of an acute mixing zone and the use of marine species. Also, we support the use of minimum levels for a compliance determination; however, some concern has been raised based on the State Implementation Plan that some minimum levels cannot be met using available laboratories. There is also concern that some of the objectives are based on overly conservative assumptions. The area of most concern to the group is the proposal to add Outstanding State Resource Waters (OSRS)and Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONWR). There is a concern that the nomination and selection of these uses for some waters could prevent continued or increasing discharges to select areas. National Mixing Zone Regulations The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)is preparing to propose a national regulation in 2001 governing State and Tribal mixing zone policies. Mixing zones are areas within water bodies where pollutants discharged from pipes are allowed to mix at high concentrations before entering the surrounding water in safe concentrations. EPA is currently considering a full range of options for the proposed regulation, including a prohibition of mixing zones for bioaccumulative chemicals of concern,the approach EPA recently finalized for the Great Lakes. EPA is working to develop the regulation for proposal in mid- 2001. It would not take effect until after a full opportunity for public comment and stakeholder input. The proposed national regulation would amend the federal regulations for Clean Water Act water quality standards. For more information: http://www.epa.gov/osttmixinozones/national.html. Transfer and Cross-Collateralization of Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolvina Funds The SDWA Amendments of 1996 established the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF)and also contain a provision authorizing states to transfer funds between the DWSRF and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). Congress also created additional flexibility by authorizing a form of cross- collateralization in the Appropriations Act. With proper planning, priority setting, and public disclosure, these two provisions can assist the states in maximizing their infrastructure funding programs by increasing the availability of funds where they are most needed—enhancing bond ratings,and lowering Monthly Update 7 November, 2000 borrowing costs without increasing risks. Since there are similarities between the two SRF programs, the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) intends to administer the two programs in a similar manner in regard to transfers and crosscollateralization. Requirements regarding transfer and cross-collateralization of funds are contained in EPA's Interim Final Rule, Drinking Water State Revolving Funds(see 65 FR 48286). This policy establishes EPA policy regarding the use of these two provisions in funding DWSRF and CWSRF projects. It identifies the process a state must undergo to gain EPA approval for incorporating transfers and/or cross-collateralization into its SRF program. For further information see www.epa.gov/owm/finan.html. Non Sequitur 'The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. -Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 B.C. use of human waste on Inousurai crops causes stir in Jan Joaquin valley rage I or S BROB' N ns � _ C 1 L U 1Y F I" L �� ;. f 1.1 '__" f t r Want to subscribeweer es Use of human waste on industrial crops causes he SoCal Water Resources P News? We cover it all, stir in San Joaquin Valley every day: Water,waste- water,flood control, and Associated Press-11/8/00 coastal water quality. By Kiley Russell, staff writer It's free! FRESNO-If it weren't for the constant shipments of human waste Visit our subscription page from Southern California's cities, Kern County farmer Shaen Mogen at: says his farm would dry up and blow away. http://204.212.225.138/ Mogen grows barley,wheal and mile for animal feed on 7,000 acres socalh2onews/subscribe/ he describes as"highly alkaline and really very marginal"--so subscribe.htm marginal, in fact,that without regular truckloads of treated sewer sludge to be used as fertilizer,the land would be useless, he said. Or, simply e-mail the editor at Mogen is paid roughly$25 a ton to dump the sludge on his land. kharlowOhome.com with your name, title, and "The only reason we survive here is that we get a fee for removing the agency. sludge and incorporating it on our farm.We also make our money out of the crop we grow because we get it subsidized by free fertilizer," Mogen said. The growing use of urban sewage as fertilizer on industrial farms, however, is unpopular in the San Joaquin Valley. Over the past two years, several county governments have waged legal and political battles against a few local farmers and Southern California sanitation districts over where and how the stuff is used. Kem, Fresno,Tulare and Kings counties have all either enacted or are drafting ordinances intended to ban the practice or tighten regulations. The counties,which account for roughly a third of the state's $28.4 billion annual agricultural output,fear a consumer backlash if word gets out that effluent from Southern California is being used to grow their crops. "Folks are concerned that the perception would be that Kern County crops (intended for humans)were poisoned with sewage sludge.We know that isn't true,but that is the concern people have,"said David Price,who as chief of the Kern County Resource Management Agency helped draft the new rules. Since 1994, federal and state regulations have allowed the use of sludge,also called biosolids,to grow animal feed or fiber crops, such as alfalfa or cotton. Regulations govern how often and how much sludge can be used,to what extent it can be contaminated with heavy metals and other industrial waste, and what levels of pathogens are acceptable. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/2000-11.../11-08_human_waste.ht 1 1109/2 0 0 0 Use o1 human waste on Inaustrlal crops causes stir in San Joaquin valley Page L or:5 The sludge is filtered from urban sewers and siphoned into vats where _ it's cooked to kill most of the viruses and bacteria.The result is a thick black muckish sludge that's loaded into trucks and driven to composting sites,landfills or Central Valley farms. In an effort to fight the"sewage farm"perception, Kern County enacted an ordinance to ban all but the most highly treated,cleanest sludge by 2003.Any sludge used in the county after that will have to be composted with so-called green waste such as tree trimmings or lawn clippings. But composting adds costs and reduces the sludge's usefulness as a soil treatment or fertilizer. To protect their sludge program, Orange and Los Angeles counties, the city of Los Angeles,the California Association of Sanitation Agencies and a handful of farmers who dump the sludge sued Kern County. "We don't like being in fights with other county agencies.We only did it as a last resort,"said Bob Horvath, chief of technical service at Los Angeles County Sanitation District No.2."It's a difficult situation if one county after another wants to set up a whole new set of rules or adopt bans." In response, Kern County and a group of farmers filed a countersuit claiming the county should have the right to make its own land-use decisions without undue influence by outside agencies or governments. "There's a number of scientists who don't believe it's safe,who don't believe the current rules are adequate to protect the land,water or air,"said Jeff Green,a lawyer for the organically operated Grimway Farms, one of the nation's largest carrot growers and a plaintiff in the countersuit. "If you're not sure if It's safe, its best to be conservative,"Green said. Kern County takes more sludge than any other county--about 30 percent of the sludge generated statewide,or roughly 250,000 tons a year, Price said. Some of the remaining sludge is sent to farmland in Kings County, some is composted and sold to the home gardening crowd and some is simply buried in landfill sites around the state. Fresno County,where no sludge is currently being dumped, is considering a ban similar to Kem's; Kings County wants to tighten regulations;and Tulare County's application process is so complicated that farmers say it keeps people from even trying to dump sludge there. All of the counties are anxiously awaiting the results of the legal battle over Kern's ordinance.A preliminary ruling issued by a Tulare County judge upholds the Kern rules.A final decision is expected within the next few weeks. If the ordinance is allowed to stand, Southern California officials http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/2000-11...111-08_human_waste.ht 11/09/2000 use of numan waste on Inauslnal crops causes stir In Jan Joaquin valley rage o or o despair of finding another location for what they see as an efficient waste recycling program. 'There's an integrated relationship here—food comes from the valley to L.A.,it gets converted back into sewage and there you go, there's perfect recycling. It gets sent back to the farms were It originated; Horvath said. As far as the health and safety issue goes,farmer Megan is confident the sludge isn't going to hurt anyone. "There are many regulations right now that stop you from putting on biosolids where the water table would be contaminated. It's a very safe product—I've been fussing with it for 15 years and I've never seen anyone get sick,"Megan said. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/2000-11.../11-08_human—waste.ht 11/09/2000 As WWMWW..Nmre rS.2K0 • rMSeareaenmpee i• STATE Human waste as fertilizer causes San Joaquin stink Valle counties fear �' U —� acted an ordinance to ban all but statewide or roughly 2150,000 y t X si o.. {�„� I'SRe the most high�v treated,cleenset tone a year,Price said. consumer backlash �tl t sludge by2003Anysluused Same oftheremesng sludge is sn infra county after that edgell m have sent farmland mlGnge County, OVC[sludge OR CIOpS - to be composted with so-called some is mmpweted and sold to the green waste such as tree trim- home gardening crowd and some By KileylbuaeBmings or lawn clippings. is stmP1Y buried no landfill sites Awitionull'-se - 't if Butte posting adds costs and around the state reduces she sludges usefulness as Fresno County,where an sludge FRESNO If wereal far the ` ♦ l -v urtraincessitinfortiliser. is currently being dumped is con. constant shipments of human �' �t dd 11 y -s ` To proted their lad, pm- suffering a ban wailai to Kem'e, wants from Southern California's coy 1P t ya,, - bto and Co.hoe Angeles Rings County wants tighten 'ties,Kam County farmer Sheen � � z,v '�'` 5` Sri tea the city of Ian Jingoists, regulations and Tulare Comtye m Mogen says his far would div up d}.l i'= u'' the Cehfornia¬ation ofSam apphcahonpromesissocouli - .it blow swily. \ tritium Agencies and a handful of Gated that termer as t ken .0 'f, farmers who due the elude people from event m due Mogen grows burley,wheat end 4 � � dKe County.P g plod¢there trying p meta he animal steed ov i k.- � i `We don't lik being m Bilious s All fthe couoh¢s ere evuouel mrean for oa "Wghiy.kd B Y marggd reallY"¢tymwithou' g awl with the a.laounty reuait' We awaiting the svWr of the legal . A er troo infect,of treat dsent "6 r `: 1�did n as a last resort,"said battle over Keng ardmmce A der ato be da of treated sewer {5 = +'Cr' Kai Bob ce ash chief of technical hers, Cinerymbhgrsuedbds the Toil- eludgewidbo ,aw lew,hi,imi the ..,�.w„�<s,/ ire at Los endue a county leer County judgSan) upholds the v ' Sa IC.adiOsctnn No.2. Kean mica. n theideciew weeks. imd world be veleta,heeaid - °t*- k `h'eedntficult situation if... parted within Wevert few weeks. is ex- Megemheis failid unhilllghly rid. < If la dump my reason hen laid - county after new a of tax lead. Si now. California ed W z up a whole new set of rules or sbnd, Sdutrem Cewa offi- 9he only rearm tunrve a, °�.,e adapt bane." In response, Be. letsdespevoffindmganotherlo- mgtethetwegatefeeforremov `/ 'Y' and a ivg the sludge and incemorting /s' L ! QS 'e riled County countersuit cl vaimf nmthe cient waste mcon too.. auhe0 gong om ffi- it an war farm.We also make our t { `;., •'� r,. B cYc gProgr • - county s ouldwn have the right n. 'ip here food corned relafrom the conew coney a getiheawpwed by be- wool=>'e useless. make its undue land-use by out- egos, to L food comes firm tea we gat it subsidized by free Kern County farmer zShaere his Mogen lane weren't for Thefornia, Megan says, co Iona would sludge useless. without undue Wluence by ouo Valley to LA,it gab themconvered you feThegr,"Megwe el sewer sludgepment to fertilizeeste from if ItwerenCfor Thefee herms for ve.hearming the slutlge else side ores eaumbermmenb. back into aewege and thereyou e asforivg we of wbmaew- the ahlpmanlsol human waatelrom$omM1ern Cali. helps his term survive,he eeye. 'fhre number fix ale,who go,Vit there's perfect recycling. It i ee ow...r,Ion opulterie who don't believe ifs sine,who geta sent ead,'to the fe ssid. re theme,6oweve;I.mpopver in The counties.thrdoftwhichst aonm for but that d .hero e, people central ith nfra y metals and other in- dGli'Lladequate to product the land. ere it lai far asd;N health said. We San doavmaiand Over the billion a nual agriculturate'sal $23A have;teed DavSam pricCounty who ce pathogens am acceptable. table. vets of ter or meta id Jecltbslmalaw-wa. se geastrmerMa and safety coamence have wer.amty goo- billionannualegdculacklbut- Management Kem Countypeddreft pathogens reaaetered . yet farts organically vmum] dermthee,fermer Megeo ini e b have waged legal and put tear a consumer backlash if themgemeesAgency helpeddmR The sludge is 61mred from aur-te yet for the ems, one operated anyoneealudge mv't going W hurt politic. rs and Souther a few lo- word gets out that.skint from the new rules. ban twittered ed in ill most der Orimwq Forme, age ov the ve- anyone. rd farmers and Southern Celivr in grows eircr crops. is being used Since regulations h federal end elute where ifs tanked to kill mast of plainly intleWrro meet, "There ere many regulations vie eared how d'ubicle over tp grow their of sludge,als coed bio the use the viruses andbacteria.The re- pliIfYw're the am flies safe,, lung nobl that ship a trampuL wheremdhdwthentuKnl Kin Sofa% ani al fee or biberRds,b slut a thick black o truckh tf toube vomereitialGr it's tible would be where the water Raw,Foff hi Tell imW ud car `Folks an concwould he trm the such animal feed n fiber crops, sludge that's loaded into cock, beet b be rseaervetive,' Green table try safe product - so Gee off have all ennted ed County crops would be that Kem such as.fete or cmten.and how and driven to composting sites, said. s •Ifs a very ome it far 15-you ears ate draftingh pr ordiemcea Intended County crops untended for rue bone govern raw often use end haw landfills or Centro Valley farms. Kem Comtylekee mmeeludge been fussing with it far 15 year tabmehepreeticemGghtevregu- now)were poisoned with sewage much sludge can be used,mwhat In en effort to figr[the'sewege thin coy other meaty-about 30 and Fm never area anyone get Ietions. sludge.We know that isn't me, extent it can be contaminated farm"perception.Kem County en- percent of the sludge generated sick,'Mogen said. South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 ° (909) 396-2000 • http://www.agmd.govjL9 November 15, 2000 ID N 017301 Mr. Blake Anderson ------------------- SITE------------------- General Manager Orange, County of- Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Anderson: Your Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Program has been reviewed and is hereby approved by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District). Your approved Program, along with this approval letter, must be maintained on File and made available upon request to a representative of the District. I am pleased to present you with a certificate of recognition for those organizations that have achieved or exceeded the target AVR. We look forward to seeing your continued success when your Annual Analysis of the effectiveness of the Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Program is submitted to the District no later than August 21, 2001. Should changes occur in the interim period, such as changes in strategies offered or change in Employee Transportation Coordinator, please notify the District in writing. If you have previously informed us that your submission is for a multi-site program, please refer to the attached list of worksites included in your multi-site grouping(s). If this information is incorrect, or if you need technical assistance on any aspect of your plan, please call your Transportation Specialist, Jeanie Stockwell at (909)396-3292. Sincerely, Carol A. Gomez Manager, Transportation Programs cc: Ms. Judy Bucher - H.R. Analyst (Pa Lv.0oc 980811,TRI) e�fC� -j�otiPb ORANGE COUNTY 2 Park Pfau,Suite lW • Irvine,CA 92614 — �FM T— BUSUVSSS COUNCIL phone: 949.476.2242 • I= 949.476,9240 xrLmmw.oe&.G g MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 2000 TO: Infrastructure Committee FROM: Justin McCusker SUBJECT: Revised Policy Statements I would first like to thank all of you who participated in the revising of the 2001- 2002 legislative Action Guide. All of the statements have been returned from their respective groups, and it is now your turn as committee members to make your last revisions. Included in this packet are the policy statements relevant to Infrastructure Committee. Please take this opportunity to go over each document in an effort to make sure that it is on target with the concerns in the business community. You will have an opportunity to discuss and bring to our attention any revisions or edits that you feel necessary at the Tuesday, December 12, 2000 Infrastructure Committee meeting. You are also invited to the Friday, January 5, 2001 meeting to have the final discussion on all the policy statements, and to review the cover design and distribution plan. Please make every effort to attend. t�7 00 � - �cc. CO- -Or'" 3 Cm�F r�r� PpLIL.J{ S '%'aTA OAMV-ys �^'sEr�e2�za' a3`c OC�C• Dg-Jt 4 7�Pcc5 rler Et-ntiErtri tzsc4v4+-c7 7-� GCS —t 3 J:I EGIBUT AQa001-MM91b]Olnlmeme.CaN1NN00 SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC FUTURE Public Policy Issues INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY OBJECTIVES: High-priority status for the importance of meeting statewide infrastructure needs, evidenced by the commitment of a long-term, stable, and dedicated funding source to close current gaps between needs and funding. POSITIONS: Support for the recommendations of the California Business Roundtable's infrastructure report, "Building a Legacy for the Next Generation', 1998. • Support for adequate funding for the State Infrastructure Bank and for dedicated revenues for infrastructure projects. • Opposition to growth control policies, such as urban growth boundaries and agricultural land preservation initiatives, that artificially inflate housing costs, increase commutes, limit housing supplies and artificially inflate land values. • Support for private sector initiatives addressing community infrastructure needs. BACKGROUND: As a result of decades of insufficient investment in the state's physical infrastructure, California now faces the unfortunate reality of crumbling roads, inadequate schools, lack of affordable housing, inadequate water supplies, and failing water systems. The state's Legislative Analyst estimates that the overdue bill for public infrastructure is approximately$90 billion. Taking into consideration available revenue, the unmet need will exceed $30 billion. The Business Council believes that this huge shortfall can only be met through comprehensive solutions. No longer can the state afford to deal with infrastructure investment in a piecemeal manner. A comprehensive approach should require that a portion of state revenues be dedicated to infrastructure investment. Further, better use must be made of existing financing mechanisms such as the State Infrastructure Bank. Other creative approaches, including innovative public/private partnerships, should also be encouraged as part of this mix. A solid commitment to infrastructure investment is critical to the economic vitality of the state. Public Policy Issues PRIVATIZATION AND CONTRACTING OUT POLICY OBJECTIVES: The outsourcing of essential public services by government agencies when outsourcing will streamline government, enhance business opportunities, and lead to cost-savings, enhanced accountability, and more understandable government for the taxpayers. POSITIONS: • Support for amendments to Government Code 31000 and for Constitutional amendments leading to the attainment of the above policy objectives. • Opposition to legislation and ballot initiatives that would restrict the ability of government to contract with the private sector for professional services. • Support for local government initiatives to utilize privatization/outsourcing when such initiatives lead to the attainment of the above policy objectives. Opposition to local government forays into public service enterprises in which the private sector is currently engaged, particularly when such attempts are solely financially motivated. BACKGROUND: The Orange County Business Council believes that privatization of most services makes sense where public services can be provided by the private sector more efficiently and more cost-effectively. Privatization is an essential ingredient in local governments' efforts to streamline and responsibly manage their operations. (See also "Governmental Organization and Financing". Public Policy Issues WATER POLICY OBJECTIVE: Clean, adequate and reliable water supplies supporting the needs of economic growth in Southern California. POSITIONS: The Business Council supports: • Bay-Delta/Cal-Fed initiatives which provide timely and equitable solution to California's water needs, including: t. A governance structure that will implement plans to meet Southern California long-term water supply needs for reliability and quality. 2. State and federal funding to insure implementation of the Cal-Fed framework plan and record of decision. 3. Assurances that water accounts are managed to deliver long-term water supplies commensurate with Southern California growth. • Legislation, policies, and local projects leading to cost effective solutions for water reliability and independence, including water marketing, voluntary water transfers, water conservation, water reclamation, and water banking. • The Orange County Water District's proposed Groundwater Replenishment System, a water purification project that will provide a new source of water for Orange County. • Legislation and projects providing flood control protection to Orange County residents and businesses, including the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project, and needed improvements to Prado Dam in particular. • Programs to improve urban runoff water quality based upon a balance of effective and economic best management practices requiring regulations that deal with pollution source issues, including science to document sources and their relationship to human health. • New technologies that offer cost effective new water supplies from recycling, reclamation, desalination, and reduced use, such as smart irrigation controllers. • Environmental regulations that allow for the proper maintenance and management of water resources and water facilities. • Legislation and program to insure proper maintenance of the Upper Newport Bay as an ecological reserve. Public Policy Issues WATER (continued) BACKGROUND: Water supports the Southland's $600 billion economy. Without water, products don't get made, homes don't get built and industry cannot exist. The economic viability of Orange County as a special place for homes, commerce and industry depends on a safe, reliable and affordable water supply. To that end, the Business Council serves as a resource for educating its members, elected and appointed officials, and the public at. large about programs and projects, which will address this need. Southern California is highly dependent upon Northern California and the Colorado River for its water; up to 60 percent of the water used here is imported. The Business Council, therefore, supports all activities leading to a cost effective, fair, timely, comprehensive and long-term solution to California's water issues. The Business Council supports the Orange County Water District's proposed Groundwater Replenishment System project, which will ultimately recycle approximately 100,00 acre feet per year into the potable water supply in Orange County. The Business Council also supports water conservation and state funding for local projects to make Orange County less dependent on imported water supplies. In addition, the Business Council recognizes the importance of flood protection to Orange County residents and business and supports the completion of the entire Santa Ana River Mainstem Project as originally planned. California's ability to address its water needs, and Orange County's ability to manage its water supplies as efficiently as possible, are key determinants in Orange County's continuing economic prosperity. AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING December 20, 2000—7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 12/20/00 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on November 15, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. e. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 11/15/00 11/30/00 Totals $7,684,929.58 $5,428,708.42 CONSENTCALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file petition from Brian Kerr requesting annexation of 2.25 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Wilderness Avenue in the City of Orange; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-31, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-15, Parcel Map 98-233 Annexation). 12r20100 Page 3 -Y b. (1) Receive and file petition from Cal-Rio requesting annexation of 8.08 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Old Ranch Road in the City of Anaheim; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSO 00-32, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex Tract 15565 to the Orange County Sanitation District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-16, Tract 15565 Annexation). END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re December 20, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 15, 2000 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re December 6, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 6, 2000 to be filed. C. Authorize the Purchasing Manager to solicit bids and award one or more blanket purchase orders for repetitively ordered Laboratory Supplies, (Specification No. 5-77), in an aggregate amount not to exceed $150,000 per year, to include four one-year renewal options. d. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, and the Milk Producers Council (No. AKB-00-015) for a pilot program to sewer dairy wash water to the Santa Ana River Interceptor providing for language clarification at no additional cost to the District. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re December 7, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 7, 2000 to be filed. 12/20/00 Page 4 Y C. Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-2, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, with Ken Thompson, Inc., authorizing an addition of$145,000, increasing the total contract amount to $6,486,000. d. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for additional construction support services for the Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an additional amount of$306.359, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $1,221,885. e. (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for additional engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an additional amount of$474,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,807,047, and (2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate the acquisition of 69 easements to approve individual payments for each easement, for a total amount not to exceed $69,000, and to accept Grants of Easement from 69 property owners in connection with the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41. f. 1)Approve a budget amendment of$2,116,000 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total project budget of$19,486,000; (2) Approve plans and specifications for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1A, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. g. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$370,058 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total project budget of$19,855,058; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$370,058, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $2,720,993. h. (1) Approve a budget amendment of$19,300 for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, for a total project budget of $271,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a construction contract to Ark Construction Company for Encosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, for an amount not to exceed $177,000. 1. 1) Establish a budget of$623,200 for Plant No. 2 Headworks Pilot Testing Program, Job No. P2-66-1; and (2)Authorize the Purchasing Manager to enter into a Sole Source contract with Infilco Degremont Inc., for the Purchase and Installation of Two Bar Screen Racks, Rakes, and Appurtenances (Specification No. M-064) for an amount not to exceed $240,150. 12/20/00 Page 5 j. Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an amount not to exceed $2.350,209. k. 1) Establish a budget of$244,300 for a needs assessment(Phase 1) for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services to complete a needs assessment (Phase 1) for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-64, for an amount not to exceed $156,800. I. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc., for additional services for On-Call Computer Modeling Services for an additional amount of$100,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $225,000, M. Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of $10,439, increasing the total contract amount to $1,527,673. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the December 13, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 13, 2000 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2000. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-33, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. e. Authorize staff to conduct a competitive selection process and enter into a Reserve Fund Investment Agreement in order to maximize security, yield and liquidity. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re December 18, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on November 13 and November 20, 2000 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$56,970, for a total amount not to exceed $5,039,920,with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange 12/20/00 Page 6 v County Water District having equal shares in the additional amount of $28,485. 16. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-14, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Board of Directors' Compensation, and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 98-3: a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 10, 2000. b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-14 by titre only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) c. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-14, and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 24, 2001. 17. (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Plans and Specifications for Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62; (2) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Ark Construction Company for the Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, for an amount not to exceed $370,000. 18. (1) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and recommendation; and (2) Award a construction contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for the Distribution/Junction Box and Sludge Belt Modifications for Odor Control, Job No.J-71-1, and Distribution/Junction Box Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-2, for an amount not to exceed $693,000. 19. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 12/20/00 Page 7 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22, Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 Wwp.dl geiW Bwrd Age Was@ Board Agendas1122000.doc 9 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 2000 oJN ANITgT� 9 c 9 t O y FCr'NQ TH EN��Q�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ,p Minutes for Board Meeting r Page 2 11/15/00 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on November 15, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler X Peter Green, Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson )(-'Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Jan Debay Tom Thomson A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson -T James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X John M. Gullixson Ken Ryan 5F.Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater Shirley McCracken X Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon A Joy Neugebauer James Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan -X-'Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller A Jim Silva Chuck Smith A Peer Swan Darryl Miller X Chades E. Sylvia Art DeBolt A Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Terry Lane; Adana Schafer Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 f 11/15/00 RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolutions of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Directors Jan Debay, Lynn Daucher, Tom Saltarelli, Christina Shea and Chuck Sylvia for their contribution and dedication to public service upon their retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR It was announced that all of the working committees will meet on their regularly scheduled days in December, but the Board meeting will be held one week early on December 2dh due to the holiday. All committees except Steering Committee will be dark in the month of January. Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that there will be a workshop at the District on the GWRS project on Saturday, December 2 at 8 a.m. He urged all Directors to attend this workshop. The most recent financial numbers about the project will be presented, as well as the alternative project that has been suggested by Irvine Ranch Water District This is the final review of the project before the go/no-go decision at the January 24, 2001 Board Meeting. The dates and location of the four GWRS public workshops were announced as follows: November 16 at 7 p.m. Anaheim Community Center Assembly Hall 205 East Center Street, Anaheim November 18 at 10 a.m. Huntington Beach Library, Room C 7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach November 28 at 7 p.m. Fullerton Public Library Room B 353 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton November 30 at 7 p.m. Irvine City Hall Irvine City Council Chambers 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine Chair Eckenrode encouraged the Directors to also attend one or more of the public information workshops to learn more about the project and to hear what the public has to say. Chair Eckenrode announced that he has invited Orange County's elected representatives to Sacramento and Washington and other interested parties to a luncheon meeting on Thursday, December 14 at the District. The purposes of the meeting is to foster bipartisan discussion of local urban runoff, upstream runoff, tainted beaches and watershed management issues, as well as educate and increase awareness of how big the problems really are and to move legislators to action. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager recognized Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, who reported on the Phase 2 report on the Huntington Beach bacterial exceedances investigation, that is to be released to the public November 16. The results of the report were explained by Mr. Ghirelli, and he also stated the District would continue with additional studies identified in the report, as well as others that are currently underway. Staff believes that the District's discharge plume is not the cause of Minutes for Board Meeting 7 Page 4 11/15/00 the contamination as the report hypothesizes. Nevertheless, a team has been formed to put together a plan for the additional studies utilizing impartial scientists that will begin next spring, as well as bringing in the same experts previously consulted to help develop that plan. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 2000 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/00 10/31/00 Totals $5,689,402.06 $5,431,183.35 Director Patterson abstained on Warrants Nos. 30716 and 30717. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from J. R. Haxton requesting annexation of 1.21 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Brier Lane and Cowan Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-30, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-13, Haxton Annexation). NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the November 15, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 25, 2000 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the November 1,2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 1, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-28, approving the Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement with Southern California Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 r 11/15/00 Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP), providing for initial term of the agreement of one year with a total tens of four years including extensions effective July 1, 2001 through June 30,2005 with District's contribution not to exceed $1,223,000 over the four-year term. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the November 2, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 2,2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P14(3-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$125,074, and a time extension of 105 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,528,233. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to provide inspection, engineering services, and prepare a report on the structural integrity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-24; Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-17; and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No, 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $900,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Establish a budget for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. Pt-83, in the amount of$1,4BB,000; and (2) Authorize Staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for design services for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1-83. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve-Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-66, providing for additional services, for an additional amount of$224,153, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $649,073. Director Daly abstained. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Saltarelli, Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the November 8, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 8, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 2000. Minutes for Board Meeting v Page 6 11/15/00 d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 2000, e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-29, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Create Limited Tenn contract Engineer classification at pay range E13($67,122-$94,929); (2) Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068 -$70,847); and (3) Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99/00 budget at a proposed cost of$5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve the DistricPs Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re the meeting held on November 13,2000. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on October 16 and October 30, 2000 to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-039 with Kemiron Pacific, Inc., ending November 30, 2000, providing for an increase of$275,D00 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed$2,400,368.75; and 2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award a contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc. at a unit price of$316.79 including sales tax and delivery, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed$2,400,368.75. 17. There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Secretary of, Board of_t� ctors of Orange Cou SanitatioMistrict HAwp.dla�genda\Bwrd MlnulesUIXG Board MinuiesN 1150Ddw Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 30613 Orange County Sanitation District $ 412,186.30 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30614 Robert F.Driver Assoc. 29,576.D0 Worker's Compensation Insurance MO 6-10-92 30615 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 529.50 Safety Supplies 30616 American Public Works Association 950.00 O&M Training Registration. 30617 AMSA 18,975.00 Membership 30618 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security System Maintenance 30619 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.01 Telephone Service 30620 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,097.93 Long Distance Telephone Service 30621 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,569.33 Cellular Telephone Service 30622 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 30623 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 30624 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 136.92 Rope 30626 California Water Awareness Campaign 2000 300.00 Membership 30626 Caltrol,Inc. 1,532.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30627 CalCoast 185.DD Technical Services Meeting Registration 30628 Court Order 150.D0 Wage Garnishment 30629 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 9,862.50 Computer Maim.Agreement 30630 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 273.43 Electrical Supplies 30831 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.443.80 Plumbing Supplies 30632 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 885.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30633 County Wholesale Electric Co. 93.58 Electrical Supplies 30634 CRC Press,Inc. 6.51 Publication 30635 2000 CWEA SRTSC 1,180.00 O&M Training Registration 30636 DeInNRigid-Flex,Inc. 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 30637 Voided Check - - 30638 Edwin M.Perkins 18,600.00 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 30639 Electra-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30640 Engelhard West,Inc. 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Program 30641 Environmental Resource Association I ERA 288.60 Lab Supplies 30642 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30643 Ferguson Enterprises,Inc.11644 301.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30644 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 325.26 Lab Supplies 30645 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30646 City of Fullerton 301.66 Water Use 30647 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,671.23 Belt Filler Press Supplies 30648 Edwards Systems Technology 168.09 Safety Service Agreement 30649 Verizon California 802.66 Telephone Services 30650 Hach Company 32.00 Lab Supplies 30651 Human Resources Council 199.00 O&M Training Registration 30652 City of Huntington Beach 29.26 Water Use 30653 Industrial Air Compressor 100.75 Compressor Supplies 30864 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.373.76 Dues Deduction 30655 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 30656 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011/00 to 10115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30657 Knott's Berry Farm 136.50 Employee Deposit Transfer 30658 Labware, Inc. 2,OD0.00 Lab Training Registration 30659 Liberty Mutual Group 301.92 Workers'Comp.Claim 30860 Liquid Handling Systems 3,929.06 Pumping Supplies 30861 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 373.00 Tools 30662 Mechanical Drives Co. 808.69 Instrument Supplies 30663 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 17,980.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30664 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 30665 Motion Industries 187.56 Pump Supplies 30666 MAG-TROL, Inc. 2,118.37 Electrical Supplies 30667 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 985.00 0&M Training Registration 30668 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 960.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30669 Operation Technology, Inc. 990.00 Engineering Training Registration 30670 Orange County Marshal 434.89 Wage Garnishment 30671 OCEA 539.95 Dues Deduction 30672 US Office of Personnel Management(OPM) 3,050.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30673 Pacific Bell 16.54 Telephone Services 30674 Pacific Mechanical Supply 81.46 Plumbing Supplies 30675 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30676 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 373.95 Mechanical Supplies 30677 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 3DB78 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 30679 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1.500.00 Engineering Services J-71-3 30680 Seegol,Inc. 141.90 Lab Supplies 30681 Shade Concepts 10,870.00 Awning Installation-Admin.Bldg. 30882 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 994.85 Tools/Hardware 30683 Southern Calif.APWA 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration 30684 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 326.77 Office Supplies 30685 Super Power Products 646.50 Janitorial Supplies 30686 Voided Check - - 30687 Temperament Research Institute 1.195.00 Technical Services Training Supplies 30688 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,595.18 Mechanical Supplies 30689 United Way 372.60 Employee Contributions 30690 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 14,250.00 Temporary Employment Services 30691 Vulcan 1,869.30 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30692 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 287.14 Lab Supplies 30893 WEF 1,000.00 Membership 30694 Stephen J. Bunill 359.92 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 30695 Employee Activity Committee 310.00 Service Award Expense 30696 David A.Ludwin 739.70 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 30697 Boyle Engineering Corporation 61,665.58 Engineering Services 1-24 30698 Carollo Engineers 52,107.06 Engineering Services- Membrane/UASB Pilot Test&P2-60 30699 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 52,226.21 Engineering Services-P2-82&Drain Washwater Pilaf Projects 30700 Computerized Facility Integration 172.044.24 Engineering Services J-25-1 &Software Maintenance Agreement 30701 Cytec Industries 27,884.25 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 Page 2 of 8 e Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10/16100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30702 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 26,310.05 Belt Filter Press Supplies 30703 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 28,676.37 Medical Insurance Premium 30704 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 98,044.19 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 30705 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 44.763.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 30706 Orange County Water District 72.381.44 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 30707 Synagro West, Inc. 39.555.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30708 Power Lift Corporation 29.012.77 2000 Caterpillar HD Industrial Lift Truck 30709 Projects Partners 26,478.93 Temporary Employment Services 30710 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 145,801.97 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 30711 So.Cal.Gas Company 33,905.25 Natural Gas 30712 Tule Rench/Magan Farms 71,323.60 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30713 Vulcan 121,9D4.57 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30714 Western Stales Chemical,Inc. 57,087A6 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 30715 Woodra6,Spradlin&Smart '19,661.46 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 30716 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 291,223.97 Construction 3-38.1 30717 Ken Thompson, Inc. 833,974.84 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 30718 Olsson Construction,Inc. 386,429.00 Construction J-52 30719 Union Bank of California 92.663.86 Construction 11-17-3,Retention 30720 Orange County Sanitation District 37.616.66 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 30721 A Tint of Glass 95.00 Window Tinting 30722 A-Plus Systems 3,139.98 Notices 8 Ads 30723 Advanced Calibration Designs,Inc. 909.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 30724 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 4,947.59 Emissions Monitoring Systems Parts&Supplies 30725 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 3,125.02 Lab Training Registration 8 Supplies 30726 Air Products 8 Chemicals 318.13 Lab Supplies 30727 Airborne Express 153.73 Air Freight 30728 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 778.99 Safety Supplies 30729 American Airlines 7,809.00 Travel Services 30730 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 540.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 30731 Appleone Employment Service 1,369.31 Temporary Employment Services 30732 Applied Industrial Technology 1,068.92 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 30733 Arcom Electronics,Inc. 3,771.25 Microwave Site Survey 30734 Amus Data Security 204.00 OHaite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 30735 Arizona Instrument 3,009.35 Instrument Supplies 30736 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 813.00 Vacuum Truck Services 30737 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 42.07 Plaques 30738 ARA Engineering Contractor 481.00 Professional Services-11-29 30739 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.04 Telephone Service 3074D AWSI 362.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 30741 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service-BI-annual Contract 30742 Battery Specialties 1.085.31 Batteries 30743 Bauer Compressors 5.496.73 Safety Supplies 8 Equipment 30744 Bob Weaver Painting 570.00 Painting Bldg. H Calling 30745 Bush&Associates, Inc. 9,760.00 Surveying Services NO 6-26-97 30746 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 391.66 Rope Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011/00 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30747 Cal-Glass, Inc. 488.52 Lab Equipment Service 30748 Cad R.Nelson,P.E. 2,580.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 30749 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 14.56 Engineering Services-Air Quality 30750 Mark Castillo 1.832.24 Meelirg/iraining Expense Reimbursement 30761 Coast Fire Equipment 47.42 Annual Fire Extinguisher TestinglCed. 30752 Compressor Components Of California 1,32e.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30753 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 2,164.39 Electrical Supplies 30754 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,471.33 Plumbing Supplies 30755 Cooper Energy Services 14,234.85 Engine Supplies 30756 Corporate Express 2,603.19 Office Supplies 30757 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 173.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 30768 Vokfed Check - - 30759 County Wholesale Electric Co. 642.62 Electrical Supplies 30780 Courtyard By Marriott 554.88 0&M Meetingrrraining Expense 30761 Crane America Services,Inc. 2.500.00 Crane Services 30762 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 861.25 CCTV Sewer Inspection 30763 2000 CWEA SRTSC 330.00 0&M Training Registration 30764 David R.Woodruff,Ag Consultant 660.00 Professional Service-Biosolid Sites Soil Sampling&Analysis 30785 David's Tree Service 5,400.00 Tree Maint. Service 30766 Del Mar Analytical 3,138.00 Slosolids Analysis 30767 DeZurik C/O Misce/SouthWest 1,356.86 Valves 30768 Dionex Corporation 9,633.51 Lab Pads&Supplies 307e9 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 490.69 Paint Supplies 30770 DDB Engineering,Inc. 4,400.00 Temporary Employment Services 30771 DGA Consultants,Inc. 8,964.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 30772 E.Sam Jonas Distdbutom, Inc. 19.40 Electrical Supplies 30773 Eagle Aerial Imaging 6,407.50 Software Maintenance Agreement 30774 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 190.00 Medical Screening 30775 Employment Development Dept. 9,864.00 Reimbursable Unemployment Costs 30776 Enchanter, Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 30777 Environmental Resource Association I ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 30778 ELG Environmental Construction 10,415.00 Cleaning Service Maintenance Agreement-Fuel Tanks 30779 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,050.08 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 30780 F. H. Pumps 435.17 Pump Supplies 30781 FedEx Corporation 361.15 Air Freight 30782 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,141.64 Lab Supplies 30783 Flo-Systems, Inc. 3,e30.14 Pump Supplies 30784 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 7,644.88 Engineering Services P-183 30785 Fortie Benefits Insurance Company 18,042.78 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 30786 Fountain Valley Camera 61.41 Photo Supplies 30787 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash . 328.98 Truck Wash Tickets 30788 Fry's Electronics 158.17 Computer Supplies 30789 FLW, Inc. 206.74 Plumbing Pans&Supplies 30790 FM International, Inc. 11,531.93 Professional Service J-25-1 30791 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,662.79 Fiberglass Repair Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30792 Gauge Repair Service 56.23 Gauge Repair 30793 W W Grainger, Inc. 5,693.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30794 Graseby S.T.I. 166.08 Engine Supplies 30795 Gmyber Electric Company 7.051.35 Electrical Supplies 30796 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 102.37 Janitorial Supplies 30797 Vedzon California 1,376.50 Telephone Services 30798 Hach Company 4,451.25 Lab Supplies 30799 Halcyon Electric,Inc. 3,530.00 Electrical Supplies 3080D Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 30801 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 167.75 Meeting Expenses 30802 Hill Brothers 24,580.15 Odor Control Chemical Testing at Seal Beach Pump Sta. 30803 HIM, Inc. 1,693.47 Tools 30804 The Holman Group 1,417.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium 30805 Home Depot 1,147.67 Small Hardware 30806 Hunts'Final Phase 5.936.25 Construction Service-Traffic Signs,Wall Repairs 30807 Hydrotex 1,787.00 Lube Oil 30808 HST Software 747.00 Software 30809 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 14,085.00 Records Management Program 30810 Imaging Plus, Inc 1,491.20 Printing Service 30811 Infiloo Degremant,Inc. 143.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30812 Infinity Technology USA 1,267.88 Computer Printer Supplies 30813 Intergraph Corporation 12,701.14 Software Malnt.Agreement 3D814 Irvine Photo Gmphlcs 5.92 Photographic Services 30815 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 30816 J&B Auto Parts 128.39 Auto Parts&Supplies 30817 J&L Industrial Supply 366.31 Tools 30818 J.D.Edwards 995.00 Finance Training Registration 30819 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 17.411.84 Misc.Construction Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Test Facility Piping 30820 Jay's Catering 1,971.70 Meeting Expenses 30821 Jensen Instruments Co. 1,471.55 Instrument Supplies 30822 Johnstone Supply 691.49 Electrical Supplies 30823 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 5,500.D0 Engineering Services 2-41 30824 Kerry Consulting Group 2,993.49 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 30825 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,081.85 Tools&Supplies 30826 Lab Support 3,799.38 Temporary Employment Services 30827 Lee&Ro, Inc. 13,746.07 Engineering Consulting Services 5-49,5-50,5-51 &5-52 30828 Lessons in Leadership 867.00 IT Meeting Registration 30829 Lieben Cassidy 287.50 Professional Service-Human Resources 30830 Gerald R.Jones 7,594.48 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 30831 Uniform Center 610.73 Uniforms 30832 Manley's Boller Repair Company, Inc. 6,552.31 Boiler Repair 30833 MarVac Electronics 59.51 Instrument Supplies 30834 Matt Chlor, Inc. 2,042.38 Valves 30835 MCBain Instruments 811.27 Lab Supplies 30836 McGarry Central 1,240.00 Dines Equipment Maintenance Agreement Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 10M100 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30837 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 608.63 Tools 30838 MCRay Industries, Inc. 669.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30830 Mac Analytical System 950.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 30840 Medlin Controls Co. 2,587.91 Instrument Supplies 30841 Mid-West Associates 3,020.62 Pump Supplies 30842 Mission Uniform Service 145.00 Uniform Rentals 3D843 Moreland&Associates 5,133.08 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 30844 MoloPhoto 118.98 Photographic Services 30845 MAP 9,930.00 Management Consulting Service 30846 MGD Technologies, Inc. 2,477.60 Temporary Flow Monitor 30847 Mine Safety Appliance C/O Mag Systems 4.231.87 Instrument Supplies 30848 National Microcomp Services 1,268.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 30849 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14,604.31 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 30850 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 10,131.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 30851 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mail Delivery Service 30852 Ocean Test Equipment, Inc. 51.65 Lab Supplies 30853 Once Depot Business Services Div. 4,198.87 Office Supplies 30854 Olympus America, Inc. 1,128.50 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 30855 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 615.89 Electrical Pans&Supplies 30856 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 101.55 Plumbing Supplies 30857 Orange County Sanitation District 410.99 Petty Cash Reimb. 30858 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,760.00 Service Agreement 30859 Oxygen Service Company 975.30 Specialty Gases 30860 OCB Reprographics 171.37 Printing Service-Spec P-173 30861 OCV Valve 672.10 Valve Supplies 30862 01 Analytical 296.16 Lab Supplies 30863 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 26.57 Electrical Supplies 30864 Pacific Mechanical Supply 701.68 Plumbing Supplies 30865 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 1,369.75 Pans&Supplies 30866 Parker Supply Company 4,656.01 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 30867 Antonino Fire 1,197.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30868 Polydyne,Inc. 23,093.59 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11.92 30869 Pool Supply of Orange County 415.97 Operating Supplies 30870 Power Pumps,Inc. 2,310.D4 Pump Supplies 30871 Precise Sensor,Inc. 258.60 Electrical Pans&Supplies 30872 Primary Source 1,947.14 Office Furniture 30873 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 1,170.00 Electrical Service Maint. 30874 Quantum Compliance Systems, Inc. 6.311.82 Software Maintenance Agreement 30875 Ouickdeaning Janitorial Service 90.00 Janitorial Services 3DS76 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 30877 Relnin Instrument Co.,Inc. 294.31 Lab Supplies 30876 Ramsay Corporation, 513.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 30879 Reliastar 17,937.52 Employee Medical Health Premium 30880 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 15,982.38 Life Insurance Premium 30881 Restek Corp 487.71 Lab Supplies Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30882 Rochester Instrument System 1.344.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30883 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 847.43 Electrical Pads&Supplies 30884 Roto Rooter-N.O.C. 11 1,694.50 Sewer Line Repair 30885 Rutan&Tucker Attorneys at Law 6.268.92 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 30886 RPM Electric Motors 622.20 Electric Motor Repair 30887 Schwing America,Inc. 3.879.42 Pump Supplies 30888 Scots Specialty Gases, Inc. 619.25 Specialty Gases 30889 Sears Industrial Sales 63.25 Mechanical Supplies 30890 Second-Sun 729.79 Light Fixtures 30891 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 40.01 Tools 30892 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1.613.78 Tools/Hardware 30893 Skalar, Inc. 7.515.00 Lab Supplies 30894 Smith Pipe&Supply 311.86 Plumbing Supplies 30895 So.Calif.Waste Mgmnt. Forum 130.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30896 Sow-Lynch Corp. 709.90 Janitorial Supplies 30897 SoftView Computer Products 871.14 Stationery&Office Supplies 30898 SoftCholw 987.68 Software 30899 Southern California Edison 10,724.21 Power 30900 Spex Cedprep,Inc. 266.00 Lab Supplies 30901 State Board of Equalization 568.34 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 30902 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 550.00 Landscape Maint. 30903 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,648.13 Mechanical Supplies 30904 Severn Trent Laboratones(STL)Sacramento 1.378.00 Lab Analytical Service 30905 The Merdwood Corporation 2,292.94 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 30906 The Orange County Register 622.50 Notices&Ads 30907 ThermoOuest Corporation 89.55 Lab Supplies 309DB Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,810.05 Mechanical Supplies 309M Daily Pilot 50.00 Notices&Ads 30910 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,552.00 Lab Services 30911 Teksystems 100.00 Temporary Employment Services 30912 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 30913 Ultra Scientific 40.70 Lab Supplies 30914 United Parcel Service 28.62 Parcel Services 30915 Unocal 76 174.68 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38.1 Inspection 30916 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 350.00 Conference Registration-Board Member 30917 Valley Cities Supply Company 386.45 Plumbing Supplies 30918 Vortex Industries,Inc. 381.27 Door Repair 3D919 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4.960.49 Lab Supplies 30920 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,021,72 Security Guards 30921 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 16,639.15 Safety Supplies 30922 Westport Electric Supply 717.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30923 Wilhelm Electric Co.,,lnc. 502.00 Construction-Vehicle Charging Station 30924 Xerox Corporation 9.059.29 Copier Leases 30925 The Yakima Company 11,674.82 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 30926 Union Bank of California 18,718.78 Construction 3-38-1,Retention Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10/16100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30927 Chloe D. Dao 1,346.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30928 Me=Polo S.Velasco 431.76 Meelingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 30929 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 345.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30930 Dean Yokoysma 8 Dell Computers 2,628.87 Employee Computer Loan Program 30931 Jeffrey D.Gitch 1,768.67 Employee Computer Loan Program 30932 Michael D.Moore 521.93 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 30933 Orange County Sanitation District 578.74 Petty Cash Reimb. 30934 Brian K,Reed 390.75 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 30935 Marco Polo S.Velasco 186.01 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,150,109.30 Payroll Disbursements 20817-20948 Employee Paychecks $ 157.012.78 Biweekly Payroll 10/4/00 20W9-20955 Employee Paychecks 7,444.05 Adjustments B Termination 53882.54138 Direct Deposit Statements 692,388.13 Biweekly Payroll 10/4/00 Total Payroll Disbursements It 856.844.96 Wine Transfer Payments Chase Manhattan Bank National Association $ 9.875.97 September Payment on Paineweber Swap 2000 Series A State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA. 672,571.83 September Interest Payment on 1990-92 Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 682,447.80 Total Claims Paid 1011/00-10/15/00 $ 5,889,402.08 Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 a Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 30936 American Express & 36,694.62 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 30937 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 173,432.60 Natural Gas Spec No.9900-20 30938 County of Orange 850,000.00 Construction Agreement-East Garden Grove Wintemburg Channel Project 30939 Orange County Sanitation District 423,909.47 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30940 Southern California Edison 39,879.12 Power 30941 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 38.68 Safely Supplies 30942 APWA C/O Psomas 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration 30943 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 49.11 Telephone Service 30944 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 70.64 Cellular Telephone Service 30945 Robert M. Bell 264.57 Meelingrhalning Expense Reimbursement 30946 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 30947 Court Omer 200.00 Wage Garnishment 30948 California Automatic Gate 85.00 Service Agreement 30949 Cappo,Inc. 250.00 Purchasing Training Registration 30950 Court Omer 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30951 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 22,223.92 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process MID 922/99 30952 CMTA 225.00 Accounting Training Registration 30953 CSMFO 25.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 30954 CWEA Membership 100.00 Notices&Ads 30956 Ecology Tire, Inc. 536.50 Waste Management-Tires 30956 Elsevier Science 942.00 Publication 30957 Employers Group 2.718.48 Membership 30958 Court Omer 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30959 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30950 Governmental Accounting Standards Board 3110.00 Publication 30961 Verizon California 1,370.63 Telephone Services 30962 Home Depot 26.92 Small Hardware 30963 Information Resources 210.00 Human Resources Service 30964 Inside EPA 650.00 Publication 30965 Intl Union of Oper Erg AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 30966 Krono's Inc. 1,600.00 Users'Group Registration 30967 Lexis-Nexis 170.54 Publication 30958 Los Angeles County 1,038.50 Sewer Service Connection Agreement IWO 9123198 3009 Lucci's 63.05 Meeting Expense 30970 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 267A3 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30971 Mission Uniform Service 4,342.16 Uniform Rentals 30972 National Technology Transfer, Inc 7,208.00 O&M Training Registration 30973 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 HR Training Registration 30974 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 30975 OCFA 510.85 Dues Deduction 30976 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30977 Court Omer 296.00 Wage Garnishment 30978 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 30979 Power clo Dodson&Associates 30.00 Admin.Meeting Registration 30980 Public Communication of Los Angeles WCLA) 215.00 Publication Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30981 R&R Instrumentation, Inc, 437.84 Electrical Pane&Supplies 30982 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 155.56 Tools 3D983 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 30984 Sidnella Villanueva 710.00 Reconciliation Connection Fee Refund 30985 Special Plastic Systems,Inc. 2,775.37 Plastic Parts&Supplies 30986 Summit Steel 97.67 Metal 30967 SCAP 16.666.67 Membership 30988 SCCWRP 500.00 ECM Meeting Registration 30989 SHRM 2000 1,160.00 Publication 30990 Taylor-Dunn 86.30 Electric Can Pans 30991 Thompson Indusbial Supply.Inc. 138.78 Mechanical Supplies 30992 U.S.Composting Council 450.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Expense 30993 The Uniscurce Corporation 157.56 Office Supplies 30994 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 30995 Layne T.Baroldi 391.25 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimbursement 30996 James R. Harris 412.80 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 30997 Chuck Hodge 465.45 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 30998 Matthew P.Smith 421.55 Meetinglfraining Expense Reimbursement 30999 Robyn A.Wilcox 328.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31000 Morris C.Ying 222.27 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31001 Jose C.Arrlbriz 259.64 Meeting Tralning Expense Reimbursement 31002 Catherine M. Biele 132.86 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 31003 Damn L.Canen 220.11 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 31004 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,320.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 31005 Thomas D.Dodderer 374.77 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 31006 Employee Activity Committee 00.00 Service Award Expense 31007 Ruben P.Ghirelli 122.06 Meeting/framing Expense Reimbursement 31008 Tyrom C.Given 208.64 Workers'Comp.Claim 31009 Robert A.Livingston 79.57 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31010 Michael D. Moore 582.72 Meeling/rralning Expense Reimbursement 31011 Raymond Navarro 296.78 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 31012 Fred J.O'Brien 561.65 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 31013 Welter W.Williams 171.89 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 31014 Blue Cross of California 185,360.30 Medical Insurance Premium 31015 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 244,721.00 Natural Gas Spec. No.9900-28 31016 California Association of Sanitation Agencies 25,000.00 Professional Services-General Counsel 31017 CH2MHIII 49,594.23 Engineering Service J-714 31018 Della Dental 47,444.04 Dental Insurance Plan 31019 Gang Equipment&Maintenance 80,775.60 8.5 Ton Industrial Carry Deck Crane 31020 Getinge Castle 25,661.00 Lab Supplies 31021 Haaker Equipment Company 240.806.17 Vector Model 2105 Sewer Cleaning Truck 3f022 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 76,886.59 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 31023 Municipal Water Diet.of Orange County 206,250.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 31024 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 29,005.33 LubricantlDiesel Fuel 31025 Orange County Water District 247,792.07 Consulting Services-Ground Water Replenishment System 31026 Projects Partners 32,514.19 Temporary Employment Services Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31100 ` Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31027 Realtime Systems Corporation 49,697.00 Professional Services-Software Support 31026 SoftChoice 33,830.76 Software 31029 Southern California Edison 31,609.33 Power 31030 The Levas Group 29,818.77 Consulting Service-Project Management Process 31031 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 83,822.08 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 31032 Vulcan 43.567.45 Hydrogen Perowde Specification No:C-044 31033 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 44,735.08 Engineering Service J-67 31034 J W Contracting Corporation 252,055.00 Construction P2-60 31035 Margate Construction,Inc 222,575.00 Construction P239 31036 Southern Contracting Company 40,692.00 Construction P2-47-1 &J33-1 31037 A-Plus Systems 1,353.56 Notices If Ads 31038 Acopian Technical Company 803.81 Instrument Supplies 31039 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 3,436.49 Computer Supplies 31040 Aearo Company 390.50 Safety Supplies 31041 Air Products&Chemicals 13.20 Lab Supplies 31042 Airborne Express 30.39 Air Freight 31043 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2.477.63 Safety Supplies 31044 Angles Lyons Safety 90.71 Safety Supplies 31045 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 430.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 31046 Appleone Employment Service 1.841.38 Temporary Employment Services 31047 Applied Industrial Technology 359.62 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31048 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Oftsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 31049 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 1,686.15 Waste Removal 31050 Aftek Industries,Corp 205.05 Plastic Supplies 31051 AMSA 1,400.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 31052 APEX Communications 12,388.39 Computer Maintenance-Security 31053 ASCE Continuing Education 775.00 Engineering Training Registration 31054 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,000.76 Telephone Service 31055 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 215.42 Telephone Service 31056 Basler Electric Company, Department 590 8.552.07 Electrical Supplies 31057 Battery Specialties 248.46 Batteries 31058 Sauer Compressors 316.58 Safety Supplies&Equipment 31059 Boiler&Combustion Seminars,Inc. 1,785.00 O&M Training Registration 31060 Boyle Engineering Corporation 22.017.41 Engineering Services 2-31 &2.50 31061 Bush&Associates,Inc. 960.00 Surveying Services NO 6-25-97 31062 California Automatic Gate 104.39 Service Agreement 31063 California Relocation Services,Inc. 174.80 Office Moving Services 31064 Southern California Marine Institute 11.230.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 31065 California Tattoo Manufacturing Co.,Inc 377.48 Printing Service 31066 Caltrol,Inc. 988.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31067 Carl Wanen&Co. 2,057.17 Insurance Claims Administrator 31068 Carollo Engineers 24,465.69 Engineering services-J-25-4 31069 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2.498.61 Instrument Parts 31070 Clickguard Corporation 16,416.62 Primer Service Agreement-Spec.9900-04 31071 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 3,910.08 Professional Sew.- Communication,Safety&Emergency Response Procedures 31072 Computer Sciences Corp. 6,773.86 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31073 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 76.20 Electrical Supplies 31074 Corporate Express 2,252,51 Office Supplies 31075 Cotelligent 1,249.50 Software Support 31076 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 723.16 Sewer Service Fee Admin. 31077 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,893.61 Electrical Supplies 31078 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 31070 CASA 125.00 ECM Training Registration 31080 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5.282.69 CCTV Sewer Inspection at Huntington Beach 31081 CRISP Automation Systems 750.00 Software&Hardware Maint. 31082 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 1,600.0D Vibration Analysis Service 31083 CWEA Membership 40.00 Membership 31084 David's Tres Service 10,9D0.00 Tree Mainl.Service 31085 Del Mar Analytical 2,029.00 Biosolids Analysis 31086 Dell Direct Sates L.P. 12,136.96 Computers 31087 Diamond H Recognition 2,536.47 Employee Service Awards 31088 Dionex Corporation 51.25 Lob Supplies 31089 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 455.33 Paint Supplies 31090 DDB Engineering,Inc. 10,804.00 Temporary Employment Services 31091 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 384.67 Electrical Supplies 31092 Eldridge Products 4.054.20 Instrument Supplies&Maintenance 31093 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 31094 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 9,700.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 31095 FedEx Corporation 73.60 Air Freight 31096 Filter Supply Company 443.73 Fillers 31097 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,228.50 Lob Supplies 310M Flat and Vertical,Inc. 123.00 Concrete Cutting 31099 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 5,572.00 Engineering Services P-183 31100 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 238.52 Point Supplies 31101 Franklin Covey 929.51 Of m Supplies 31102 Fry's Electronics 549.49 Computer Supplies 31103 FM international, Inc. 11,608.22 Professional Service J-25-1 31104 Gestech 174.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31105 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 20,812.05 Belt Filter Press Supplies 31106 Gilmour Group 13.D5 Garden Hose 31107 Government Finance Officers Association 60.00 Publication 31108 W W Grainger, Inc. 9,494.74 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31109 Graphic Distributors 1,157.24 Photographic Supplies 31110 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1,255.14 Janitorial Supplies 31111 Verizon California 4,163.79 Telephone Services 31112 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 31113 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 203.80 Plumbing Supplies 31114 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 231.45 Meeting Expenses 31115 Home Depot 349.58 Small Hardware 31116 Imaging Plus,Inc. 8.50 Printing Service 31117 Irvine Rench Water District 55.78 Water Use 31118 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade Page 4 of 7 a Claims Paid From 10116100 to 10131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31119 Jay's Catering 3,171.37 Meeting Expenses 31120 Jensen Instruments Co. 3,171.26 Instrument Supplies 31121 John Jacobs Associates 524.75 Auto Shop Equipment Repair 31122 Johnstone Supply 131.67 Electrical Supplies 31123 Karen Monaco&Associates l l,562.50 FIS Support Services 31124 Kan Advance Materials,Inc. 16,401.00 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 31125 Kensington Electronics 465.78 Electrical Supplies 3112E Kings County Tax Collector 3,273.22 Property Taxes 31127 Industrial Distribution Group 403.97 Point Supplies 31128 Kronos,Inc. 15,872.16 Software 31129 Lab Support 4,749.71 Temporary Employment Services 31130 Lee&Ro,Inc. 12,058.08 Engineering Consulting Services 549,50,51 &5.52 31131 Lexis-Nexis 52.58 Books&Publications 31132 Gerald R.Jones 6,344.10 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 31133 MarVac Electronics 38.07 Instrument Supplies 31134 Mao Analytical System 2,767.50 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 31135 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,OD0.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 31136 Mid-West Associates 6,436.71 Pump Supplies 31l37 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,287.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31138 Mission Uniform Service 6,123.47 Uniform Rentals 31139 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 31140 Mine Safety Appliance Co. 2.695.47 Electdcal Pads&Supplies 31141 National Plant Services, Inc. 9,750.00 Vacuum Truck Services 31142 National Research Council Canada 356.60 Lab Supplies 31143 Neal Supply Co. 2,415.28 Plumbing Supplies 31144 Newark Electronics 479.95 Electrical Pans&Supplies 31145 City of Newport Beach 49,76 Water Use 31146 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,500.20 Lab Services 31147 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 505.31 Steel Tags 31148 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,306.98 Office Supplies 31149 Orange Valve&Filling Company 315.15 Fittings 31150 Oxygen Service Company 1,326.21 Specialty Gases 31151 OCB Reprographics 5,204.30 Pdnling Service-Spec P-173 31162 OCE-USA, Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment Maim. 31153 Pacific Bell 1,128.47 Telephone Services 31154 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 31155 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4,682.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31156 Pagenet 2,026.54 Paging Services 31157 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 22,394.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 31158 Polydyns,Inc. 23,482.83 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 31159 Power Design 2,442.44 Electrical Supplies 31160 Prexair,Inc. 30.79 Lab Supplies 31161 Primary Source 2,488.30 Office Furniture 31162 Pryor Resources,Inc. 224.61 Publication 31163 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. 753.40 Fencing Installation 31164 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.393.48 Trash Removal Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31165 Reliaslar 8,397.40 Employee Medical Health Premium 31166 RPM Electric Motors 769.09 Electric Motor Repair 31167 Sencon Engineering,Inc. 961.95 Construction-Sewer Line Cleaning 31168 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 39.00 Publication 31169 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 1.473.31 Specialty Gases 31170 City of Seal Beach 1,166.88 Water Use 31171 Secend-Sun 268.69 Light Fixtures 31172 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 173.04 Tools/Hardware 31173 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Chino Basin Watermater Transfer 31174 Sigma Chemical Co. 132.11 Lab Supplies 31175 So.Cal.Gas Company 14.91 Natural Gas 31176 Saco-Lynch Corp. 285.95 Janitorial Supplies 31177 Sparkletts 2.020.17 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 31178 Strata International.Inc. 605.46 Chemicals 31179 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,805.00 Landscape Maint. 31180 Surveyors Service Company 45.12 Tools 31181 SOAP 19,000.00 Membership-Southern California Alliance of POTW 31182 SKC-West,Inc. 174.72 Safety Supplies 31183 SPEC Services,Inc. 10.123.98 Engineering Services J-33-1 31184 Talavere&Richardson 5,040.00 Consulting Services-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 31185 Teledyne Analytical 164.64 Instrument Parts 31186 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 305.24 Mechanical Supplies 31187 Time Tractor 5,400.00 Tree Planting Services 31188 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 178.44 Locks&Keys 31189 Toshiba International Corporation 5,263.56 Electrical Supplies 31190 Tran Consulting Engineers 22,350.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects Pl-65 31191 The Trans Company 2,945.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 31192 Transcal 3,185.26 Electrical Supplies 31193 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 60.91 Truck Supplies 31194 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,800.00 Lab Services 31195 Teksystems 400.00 Temporary Employment Services 31196 U.S. Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage 31197 Ultra Scientific 162.00 Lab Supplies 31198 Union Bank of California 444.09 Banking Services 31199 United Parcel Service 694.75 Parcel Services 31200 Valley Cities Supply Company 746.76 Plumbing Supplies 31201 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 318.07 Mechanical Supplies 31202 Verne's Plumbing 50.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 31203 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.342.90 Vision Service Premium 31204 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,438.66 Lab Supplies 31205 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,999.64 Security Guards 312g6 The Wall Street Journal 74.35 Subscription 31207 Western States Chemical, Inc. 16,186.46 Caustic Soda M08-23-95 31208 Western Switches&Controls, Inc. 10,688.38 Electrical Supplies 31209 Xerox Corporation 596.68 Copier Leases 31210 The Yakima Company 15,830.18 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 10116/00 to 10131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31211 Zymark Corporation 897.32 Lab Supplies 31212 Deon M.Carrico 340.23 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 31213 Ronald L Dewi0,Jr. 314.75 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31214 Timothy D.Foley 202.71 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31215 Tom E.Gawomki 227.71 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31216 Roy A.Handy 359.08 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 31217 Michael Reideler 230.13 Meelingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 31218 Mary S.Thompson 331.80 Meeling/rreining Expense Reimbursement 31219 Jane H.Tren 260.17 Mee8ng/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31220 County Clerk 38.00 Filing Fee 31221 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210.00 Administra0"Fees 31222 Janice Debay 194.10 MeeSng/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31223 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 LAFCO Fees 31224 Orange County Sanitation District 1,213.12 Petty Cash Reimb. 31225 Vahn Phonsid 1.949.18 Employee Computer Loan Program 31226 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 31227 James G.Tinge 356.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31228 Yu-Li Tsai 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,561,956.84 Payroll Disbursements 20956-21069 Employee Paychecks $ 157.526.41 B weekly Payroll 1014100 21070-21071 Employee Paychecks 3.948.01 Termination 54139-54590 Direct Deposit Statements 707,752.09 Biweekly Payroll 10/4/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869,226.51 Total Claims Paid 10/16/00-10/31100 $ 5,431,183.35 Page 7 of 7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlnq Pate TO 20/DD' jeEW.&D AGENDA REPORT rem Numbe Rem Numbe a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: WA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/1/00 - 11/15/00 and 11116/00 - 11/30/00 \4adanWabl Wp.tlbbpmtla8aatl apeiMa RepaN3J]]asN P9eMa Repau\120TM1m ebx Page 1 Claims Paid From 11/01100 to 11115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 31229 Orange County Sanitation District $ 416.763.49 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 31230 Sempra Energy Solutions 182,010.67 Natural Gas Spec No. 170 31231 Southern California Edison 56,240.12 Power 31232 Air Products&Chemicals 24,136.36 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 31233 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safely Div. 573.90 Safety Supplies 31234 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 30.97 Mechanical Supplies 31235 American Airlines 6,897.00 Travel Services 31236 Applied Industrial Technology 45.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31237 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.22 Telephone Service 31238 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,140.24 Long Distance Telephone Service 31239 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,679.77 Cellular Telephone Service 31240 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 31241 Court Order 200,00 Wage Garnishment 31242 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 45.26 Office Supplies 31243 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 31244 Comcast Cablevision 519.72 Software 31245 Compressor Components Of California 780.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31246 Consolidated Elect Distributors, Inc. 540.68 Electrical Supplies 31247 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,305.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 31248 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 31249 Franklin Covey 205.00 Office Supplies 31250 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment 31251 Graybar Electric Company 954.37 Electrical Supplies 31252 Vedwn California 134.36 Telephone Services 31253 Harvard Business Review 95.00 Subscription 31254 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 638.59 Engine Generator Control Supplies 31255 City of Huntington Beach 17,173.75 Water Use 31256 Industrial Metal Supply 86.47 Metal 31257 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,345.14 Dues Deduction 31258 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 31259 Lisa M.Lawson 152.52 Meeling7fraining Expense Reimbursement 31260 The McGraw-Hill Companies 118.61 Publication 31261 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. 35.08 Tools&Supplies 31262 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10.806.10 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 31263 National Fire Protection Association 115.00 Safely Supplies 31264 City of Newport Beach 26.74 Water Use 31265 Chung M. Nguyen 615.00 Meeling7rmining Expense Reimbursement 31266 OCFA 510.85 Dues Deduction 31287 Pacific Bell 17.71 Telephone Services 31268 Court Omer 40,00 Wage Garnishment 31269 Parker Hannifin Corporation 387.23 Mechanical Supplies 31270 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 31271 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 31272 Safetycare,Inc. 474.10 Safety Supplies 31273 SeegoB,Inc. 141.98 Lab Supplies Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01/00 to 11/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31274 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 344.26 Tools/Hardware 31275 Sharon.Larsen&Marsh 500.00 Professional Services-Chino Basin Watermaster Transfer 31276 Society for Human Resource Management 160.00 Membership 31277 SoftChoice 252.03 Software 31278 Southern California Water 96.22 Water Use 31279 Uftre Scientific 170.00 Lab Supplies 31280 The Unisource Corporation 6,126.82 Office Supplies 31281 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 31282 Ellen Ray 129.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31283 Michael D.Moore 137.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31284 SARBS-CWEA 310.00 Membership 31285 Residuals Processing, Inc. 49,326.89 Residuals Removal MO4-26.95 31286 Brown&Caldwell 287,241.79 Engineering Services P7-37&2-41 31287 Carollo Engineers 55.548.94 Engineering Services P2-66.J-39 31288 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 60,697.74 Computers-2 Dell Opliplex,9 Dell CPX Latitude Notebooks&Software 31289 Kemmm Pacific,Inc. 88,049.92 Forric Chloride MO 9-27-95 31290 Lee&Ro,Inc. 32,447.19 Engineering Consulting Services P1-68 31291 Margate Construction,Inc. 41,593.40 Emergency Repairs @ DAF 113,Plant 1 31292 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 71.100.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 31293 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 142,369.70 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 31294 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 327,734.72 Engineering Services J42,J-35.1 31295 Plate Gro Systems,Inc. 87,239.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 31296 Primary Source 34,709.38 Office Furniture 31297 Projects Partners 30.457.19 Temporary Employment Services 31298 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 91.405.79 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 31299 Vulcan 49,270.70 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C4 M 31300 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 49,305.64 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95 31301 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 39,086.73 Legal Services NO 7-26-95 31302 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 648,555.71 Construction 3-38-1 31303 Ken Thompson, Inc. 351.413.70 Construction 11-17-3&11-20 31304 Union Bank of California 39.045.97 Construction 11-17-3, Retention 31305 Union Bank of California 34,134.51 Construction 3-38A, Retention 31306 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 994.93 Legal Services-Trans vs. Kovacs 31307 Acculite Fasteners 192.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31308 Great American Printing Co. 448.12 Printing 31309 Air Liquid America Corp. 1,977.83 Specialty Gasses 31310 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 352.16 Safely Supplies 31311 American Public Works Association 12.00 Publication 31312 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 515.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 31313 Appleone Employment Service 1,755.71 Temporary Employment Services 31314 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1.040.00 Vacuum Truck Services 31315 Artistic Blinds 476.99 Mini Blinds&Installation 31316 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg.Atrium 31317 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 93.98 Cellular Telephone Service 31318 Battery Specialties 1,273.61 Batteries 31319 SenchMark Publishing Company 3,760.00 Notices&Ads Page 2 of 8 7' e r, Claims Paid From 11101/00 to 11/15/00 warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31320 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1.149.65 Publication 31321 California Automatic Gate 1,627.02 Service Agreement 31322 Caltrol,Inc. 3,298.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31323 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas,N.A. 15,633.58 Trustee Bank Service-Series"A"1993 Refunding COP 31324 Communications Performance Group,Inc 13,000.00 Professional Services-Communication,Safely&Emerg.Response Procedures 31325 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 2,081.07 Computer Maint.Agreement 31326 Computer Sciences Corp. 6.712.20 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 31327 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 7.643.06 Electrical Supplies 31328 Converse Consultants 10.977.75 Consulting Service 11-20 31329 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 31330 Corporate Express 6,368.82 Office Supplies 31331 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,588.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 31332 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 203.54 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 31333 County of Orange 109.00 Administrative Fees-Easement for Back Bay Sewer 546 31334 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,040.17 Software&Hardware 31335 COP Industries 3,971.93 Janitorial Supplies 31336 OR&R, Inc. 630.00 Container Rentals 31337 Del Mar Analytical 468.00 Biosolids Analysis 31338 Diamond H Recognition 440.13 Employee Service Awards 31339 Dickson's,Inc. 1,762.79 Electrical Supplies 31340 DDB Engineering,Inc. 10.070.00 Temporary Employment Services 31341 DGA Consultants,Inc. 4.860.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 31342 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 64.02 Electrical Supplies 31343 Econo Fence Company 1,260.00 Fence Removal&Gale Installation g Pit.#1 31344 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 820.00 Medical Screening 31345 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 10,850.00 Safety Training&Consulting Services 31346 Enchanter, Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5-24-95 31347 FedEx Corporation 25.31 Air Freight 31348 Filter Supply Company 572.36 Fillers 31349 First Metro Appraisals 14.750.00 Saktoka Easement Appraisal 31350 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 63.13 Electrical Pans&Supplies 31351 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 328.00 Concrete Cutting 31352 Flo-Systems, Inc. 8.907.33 Pump Supplies 31353 Fountain Valley Camera 24.46 Photo Supplies 31354 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 436.99 Truck Wash Tickets 31355 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 363.80 Paint Supplies 31356 Franklin Covey 459.03 Office Supplies 31357 Fry's Electronics 451.43 Computer Supplies 31358 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,833.62 Fiberglass Repair 31359 George Yardley Co. 250.28 Lab Supplies 31360 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 12,580.58 Belt Filter Press Supplies 31361 Golderwest Window Service 2.462.00 Service Agreement-Spec.#9900-15 Window Cleaning 31362 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,615.05 Electrical Paris&Supplies 31363 Greybar Electric Company 2,315.59 Printer Service Agreement-Spec.9900-04 31364 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 092.03 Janitorial Supplies 31365 GBC(General Binding Corp) 53.84 Stationery&Office Suplies Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01/00 to 11116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31366 Edwards Systems Technology 2.188.75 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 31367 Verizon California 1.538.98 Telephone Services 31368 Hecker Equipment Company 2,204.89 Truck Supplies 31369 Hach Company 3,423.74 Lab Supplies 31370 Harbour Engineering Group 22,515.20 Pump Supplies 31371 Harold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 31372 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 119.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31373 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 143.73 Engine Generator Control Supplies 31374 Herb's Blackforest Bakery It Dell 328.35 Meeting Expenses 31375 Home Depot 700.50 Small Hardware 31376 Hopkins Technical Products 2,965.19 Pump Supplies 31377 HI Standard Automotive 1,661.96 Automotive Supplies&Installation 31378 Iclus Consulting,L.L.C. 9.287.50 Records Management Program 31379 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,534.31 Printing Service 31380 Industrial Distribution Group 2,119.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31381 Industrial Metal Supply 2,038.01 Metal 31302 Infinity Technology USA 537.88 Computer Supplies 31383 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 7,054.93 Misc.Construction Services-Primary Effluent Pump Station Repairs 31384 Jay's Catering 286.99 Meeting Expenses 31385 Johnstone Supply 193.16 Electrical Supplies 31386 Kerry Consulting Group 552.10 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 31387 Kiene Diesel Accessories 264.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31386 Knott Laboratory,Inc. 2,000.00 Professional Services-Claim of Then 31389 Lab Support 4.100.00 Temporary Employment Services 31390 Law Offices of Kinkle, Rodiger&Spriggs 5,973.20 Legal Services-Claim of Then 31391 Law/Crandell 150.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 31392 Lexis-Nexis 114.96 Books&Publications 31393 Gerald R.Janes 5,154.18 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 31394 LOJack 590,00 LoJack System&Installation 31395 LNP Engineering Plastics, Inc. 870.00 Reconciliation Permit Fee Refund 31396 LRP Publications 377.50 Subscription 31397 Mine Safety Appliances 1,D60.82 Electrical Supplies 31398 Maintenance Technology Corp. 81.41 Mechanical Supplies 31399 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 3.200.00 O&M Training 31400 MarVac Electronics 110.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31401 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 35.02 Plumbing Supplies 31402 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 755.74 Tools 31403 MCRay Industries, Inc. 155.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31404 Mec Analytical System 2.988.60 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 31405 Medlin Controls Co. 1,485.98 Instrument Supplies 31406 Mid-West Associates 13,998.11 Pump Supplies 31407 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 1,995.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31408 Minadk 528.97 Instrument Supplies 31409 Mission Uniform Service 3,860.18 Uniform Rentals 31410 Mordsun d,Foeraler, LL.P. 4,323.50 Legal Services-Restructuring Series 1992&1993 COPS 31411 MCR Technologies, Inc. 7,085.45 Electrical Parts&Supplies Page 4 of 8 ' Claims Paid From 11/01/00 to 11/15/00 warrant No. Vandor Amount Description 31412 Neal Supply Co. 67.34 Plumbing Supplies 31413 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 827.06 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 31414 Office Depot Business Services Div, 1,372.94 Office Supplies 31415 Olivia Chen Consultants, Inc. 4,301.25 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Senchmarking Study 31416 Oracle Corporation-Support/Seles 1.126.42 Software&Hardware 31417 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment, Inc. 484.58 Fuel Pump Equipment 31418 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 31419 Oxygen Service Company 1,776.45 Specialty Gases 31420 OCS Reprographics 1,178.80 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 31421 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 163.69 Electrical Supplies 31422 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,336.13 Plumbing Suppllss 31423 Pacific Publishers 50.10 Publication 31424 Pallets&Accessories 2,823.05 Pallets 31425 Parker Supply Company 9,072.37 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 3142e Polydyne,Inc. 8,492.72 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 31427 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 31428 Voided Check - - 31429 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 38.18 Stationery&Office Supplies-Thermal Paper 31430 Raney Industries 750.00 Contract Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification 31431 Rellaster 8,362.70 Employee Medical Health Premium 31432 RPM Electric Motors 1,040.11 Electrical Pane&Supplies 31433 Safety-Kleen 8.317.50 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 31434 Schwing America, Inc. 142.30 Pump Supplies 31435 Seagate Recording Media Group 335.00 Reconciliation Permit Fee Refund 31436 Second-Sun 43.96 Light Fixtures 31437 Sansotec,Inc. 268.73 Electrical Supplies 31438 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 32.50 Toole 31439 Supelco, Inc. 223.57 Lab Supplies 31440 SoftCholce 36.91 Software 31441 Southern California Edison 7,238.12 Power 31442 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 426.19 Janitorial Supplies 31443 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 708.25 Office Supplies 31444 Sunset Ford 321.26 Vehicle Supplies 31445 Sunset Industrial Pans 19.22 Mechanical Supplies 31446 Super Power Products 1,002.08 Janitorial Supplies 31447 SKC-West,Inc, 860.19 Safely Supplies 31448 Seven Trent Laboratories(STL) 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 31449 The Merrhvood Corporation 2.265.55 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 31450 Thomas Grey&Associates,Inc. 450.00 Safety Supplies 31461 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 305.86 Mechanical Supplies 31452 Tony's Look&Safe Service&Sales 70.00 Locks&Keys 31453 Training 7800 Subscription 31454 Than Consulting Engineers 4,905.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects-P1.65 31455 The Thane Company 3,290.04 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 31456 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 8,449.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 31457 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 998.92 Truck Supplies Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 11101/00 to 11115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31458 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 90.00 Lab Services 31459 Trusco Manufacturing Company 2.429.00 Painting Supplies 31460 Teksystems 112.50 Temporary Employment Services 31461 The Unisource Corporation 1,017.83 Office Supplies 31462 United Parcel Service 172.31 Parcel Services 31463 Valley Cities Supply Company 333.83 Plumbing Supplies 31464 Varian Instrument Group 241.95 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 31465 Village Nurseries 42.01 Landscaping Supplies 31466 Vision Care-Dr. Cooperman 200.00 Safety Supplies 31467 VAR Scientific Products Corporation 6,325.88 Lab Supplies 31468 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,092.21 Security Guards 31469 Western Switches 8 Controls, Inc. 10.688.38 Electrical Supplies 31470 White Cap Industries 211.71 Painting Supplies 31471 Xerox Corporation 9,268.81 Copier Leases 31472 The Yakima Company 24,725.30 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 31473 Yokogawa Corp. of America 957.47 Folding Charts 31474 Catherine M.Biele 145.15 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 31475 James E.Colston 142.34 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 31476 Fred J.O'Brien 845.08 Meeting/rraming Expense Reimbursement 31477 Robert Oolen 130.87 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 31478 Knom'e Berry Farm 2,048.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 31479 Orange County Sanitation District 1.883.62 Petty Cash Relmb. 31480 Applied Industrial Technology 626.88 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 31481 CSMFO 75.00 Seminar Registration 31482 G.F.O.A. 1,608.00 Finance Training Registration 31483 Local Agency Formation Commission 2,350.00 LAFCO Fees 31484 Stale Board of Equalization 350.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 31485 Knott's Soak City U.S.A.-D.C. 50.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 31486 James O.Niswonger 250.00 Maetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31487 State Board of Equalization 500A0 Annexation Fee 31488 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 28,624.19 Medical Insurance Premium 31489 Orange County Sanitation District 583,021.06 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 31490 Pacific Investment Management Co. 131,782.00 Investment Management Service Res.9597 31491 So.Cal.Gas Company 36,743.02 Natural Gas 31492 Orange County Sanitation District 99.669.22 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 31493 Airgas Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,943.22 Safely Supplies 31494 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 122.46 Telephone Service 31495 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 31496 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 31497 California Deposition Reporters 635.40 Professional Services-Trans vs.Kovacs 31498 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 31499 Consumers Pipe 5 Supply Co. 183.21 Plumbing Supplies 31500 CWEA-SARBS, Inc. 225.00 O8M Meeting Registration 31501 Diamond H Recognition 619.18 Employee Service Awards 31502 Court Omer 741.50 Wage Garnishment 315M Thomas M. Flanagan 125.42 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimbursement Page 6 of 8 s� Claims Paid From 11/01/00 to 11115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31504 Fonis Benefits Insurance Company 19,143.98 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 31505 Franchise Tax Board 117.00 Wage Garnishment 31506 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 31507 Vedzon California 4,787.73 Telephone Services 31508 Mike J. Herrere 316.64 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31509 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 31510 Irvine Ranch Water District 26.74 Water Use 31511 Karen Monaco&Associates 12,562.50 FIS Support Services 31512 Kuser&Harris 163.70 Professional Services-Claim Trans vs. Kovacs 31513 Luccfs 115.00 Meeting Expense 31514 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 222.62 Tools 31515 National Safety Council 114.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Supplies 31516 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 31517 Orange Valve&Filling Company 393.74 Filings 31518 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 31519 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 31520 Court Order 295.00 Wage Garnishment 31521 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 31522 Voided Check - - 31523 DOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 31524 Relfeslar 16,871.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 31525 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Iris. 8,006.68 Life Insurance Premium 31526 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 952.41 Paint Supplies 31527 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 375.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31528 Southern California Edison 15,146.05 Power 31529 Southern California Edison 1,993.47 Power 31530 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,751.90 Mechanical Supplies 31531 Tomell&Cotten 430.00 Legal Services-Contract 241,Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer 31532 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 31533 Western Business Systems 363.66 Office Supplies 31534 Marc A.Brown 675.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31535 Bradley H.Cagle 1,542.38 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31536 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,080.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 31537 Jeffrey L.Key 163.19 MeefingtTrainirg Expense Reimbursement 31538 Eft en G.Lucena 183.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31539 Patrick B.Miles 1,602.99 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 31540 John Mirkovich 115.73 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31541 Michael D. Moore 148.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31542 Kenneth L.Ramey 113.55 Meefing/Training Expense Reimbursement 31543 Andrew J. Rozenstraten 1,375.40 Meetingfi-raining Expense Reimbursement 31544 Everett L.Thompson 938.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31545 Simon L Watson 320.82 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,805,667.74 Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 11/01100 to 11116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 21072-21181 Employee Paychecks $ 153,681.22 Biweekly Payroll 11/01/00 21182-21182 Employee Paycheck 2,709.33 Termination 21183-21340 Employee Paychecks 226,605.93 Biweekly Payroll 11/15/00 54591-55037 Direct Deposit Statements 695.284.20 Biweekly Payroll 11/01/00 55038-55489 Direct Deposit Statements 877,944.55 Biweekly Payroll 11/15/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,956,225.23 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Manhattan Bank $ 53,296.05 Commitment Fee an Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Slate Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA 696.414.18 October Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 9,621.50 Swap Payment on Series 20M Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 35,713.87 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 127,991.01 October Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 923,036.61 Total Claims Paid 11/01/00-11/15/00 $ 7,684,929.68 Page 8 of 8 Claims Paid From 11116100 to 11/30/00 d Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 31546 AT&T S 94.62 Telephone Equipment&Supplies 31547 ATlnt of Gless 4,691.68 Window Tinbng 31548 A-Plus Systems 4.338.44 Notices&Ads 31549 Accutite Fasteners.Inc. 33.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31550 AccuStanderd, Inc. 149.95 Lab Supplies 31551 Action Instruments 309.38 Electrical Supplies 31652 Great American Printing Co. 190.85 Stationery&Office Supplies 31553 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,756.17 Emissions Monitoring Systems Parts&Supplies 31554 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 48.13 Lab Supplies 31555 Aldce Systems,Inc. 328A2 Fiber Optic Equipment 31556 Air Products&Chemicals 24,143.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8.89 31557 Airborne Express 48.88 Air Freight 31558 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 28.29 Safety Supplies 31559 Jake Alarkl 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31560 Joseph Alatorre 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31561 American Public Works Association 85.00 Publication 31662 Analytical Technology,Inc. 11,049.44 Instrument Supplies 31563 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 370A0 Service Agreement-Pest Control 31564 Appleone Employment Service 1,490.40 Temporary Employment Services 31565 Asbury Environmental Services 664.33 Waste Oil Removal 31566 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 984.45 Telephone Service 31567 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 145.28 Telephone Service 31568 AWSI 89.49 Department of Transportation Training Program 31569 Tom Baccanti 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31570 Vito Barbieri 211.93 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31571 J V Bardin 965.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31572 Donald Barger 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31573 Bauer Compressors 186.90 Safety Supplies&Equipment 31574 John Beals 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31575 Cad Bernal 985.45 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31576 Lester Bishop 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31577 Steven Blume 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31578 Boot Barn 113.13 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 31579 Lawrence Bride 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31580 John Buchholz 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31581 Martin Burch 1,053.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31582 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1.533.81 Pump Supplies 31583 Caltrol,Inc, 184.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31584 Cambridge Isotope tabs 333.32 Lab Supplies 31585 Robert Canales 965.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31586 Cad Warren&Co. 505.02 Insurance Claims Administrator 31687 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 145.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 31588 James Causey 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31589 Lionel Chard 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31590 Charles P.Crowley Co. 946.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16100 to 11130/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31591 Charles or Cindy Cherone 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31592 City of Fountain Valley 10,042.96 Water Use 31593 Mark Clements 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31594 Coast Fire Equipment 235.98 Fire Extinguisher 31595 Coastal Training Technologies 1.308.86 Software Maintenance Contract 31596 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 5,000.00 Professional Services-Communication, Safely&Emerg. Response Procedures 31597 Compressor Components Of California 2.525.55 Mechanical Maintenance 31598 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 7.101.81 Computer Maint.Agreement 31599 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 6,940.29 Electrical Supplies 31600 Control Factors-Seattle, Inc. 994.80 Mechanical Supplies 31601 Converse Consultants 14,880.05 Consulting Services P-182 31602 Cooper Energy Services 5,226.61 Engine Supplies 31603 Core Laboratories,Inc. 440.00 Lab 31604 Corporate Express Imaging 221.38 Computer Supplies 31605 Corporate Express 1.383.30 Once Supplies 31606 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 24.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 31607 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 900.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 31608 County Wholesale Electric Co. 6.164.23 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31609 Barry Cowles 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31610 Pauline Crandall 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31611 Crane America Services,Inc. 3.160.80 Crane Services 31612 Barbara Cronin 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31813 CAPPO Conference Registration 280.00 Purchasing Meeting Registration 31614 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 31615 Dal Mar Analytical 1,752.00 Biosolids Analysis 31616 Leo Detesting 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31617 Leo Detesting 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31618 DeZunk C/O Misco/SouthWest 3,952.27 Valves 31619 Michell Di Peppino 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31620 Diehl, Evans&Co., L.L.P. 500.00 Finance Meeting Registration 31621 Dionex Corporation 825.00 Service Agreement-Lab 31622 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 91.66 Paint Supplies 31623 DGA Consultants,Inc. 2,412.00 Surveying Services P-183 31624 DMG-Maximus 900.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan 31625 Edward Eddy 965.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31626 Electra-Bond 4,773.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31627 Dorms Elliott 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31628 Jo Elliott 150.29 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31629 Enchanter,Inc. 5,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 31630 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 19,400.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 31631 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 31632 Marc Enwport 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31633 M.Esperanza 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31634 Sherry Evans 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31635 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,465.71 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 316M Donald Fager 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 2 of 10 0 <I Claims Paid From 11/16100 to 11/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31637 Gasper Farace 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31638 Juan Fallon 784.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31639 FadEx Corporation 142.16 Air Freight 31640 Patricia Figueroa 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31641 FIIeNET Corporation 18,244.25 Computer Software-Electronic Document Management System 31642 Filter Supply Company 3,727.99 Filters 31643 Jerri Finley 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31644 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,254.16 Lab Supplies 31645 Steve Fisher 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31646 Steven Fisher 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31647 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 1,433.00 Concrete Cutting 31648 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 2.972.00 Engineering Services P-183 31649 Fortts Benefits Insurance Company 11,947.89 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 31650 Fountain Valley Camera 13.74 Photo Supplies 31651 Franklin Covey 550.63 Office Supplies 31652 Fry's Electronics 2,249.56 Computer Supplies 31653 Louis Fuentes 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31654 Charles,Garrison 642.22 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31655 George T. Hall 151.67 Electrical Supplies 31656 Getinge Castle 82.64 Lab Supplies 31657 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 19.308.96 Bell Filler Press Supplies 31658 Ten Glass 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31659 Glenn Lukos&Associates 522.83 Engineering Service 2-41 31660 Golden Bell Products 6,154.50 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 31661 Richard Goode 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31662 Christopher Goodman 153.59 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31663 Thomas Graham 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31664 WW Grainger, Inc. 2.386.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31665 Graybar Electric Company 694.16 Computer Supplies 31666 Los Grilalva 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31667 Linda Gunn 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31668 Verizun California 989.15 Telephone Services 31669 Hach Company 5.272.07 Lab Supplies 31670 Michael Hamilton 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31671 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 146.25 Plumbing Supplies 31672 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 6.239.81 Engine Generator Control Supplies 31673 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 408.48 Meeting Expenses 31674 Hilti 2,449.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31675 Hollywood Party Rentals 4,580.99 Claim Settlement-Sewer Backup 31676 The Holman Group 710.00 Employee Assistance Program Premium 31677 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 22,514.DD Engineering Services 2-41 31678 Home Depot 807.82 Small Hardware 31679 Hopkins Technical Products 9,260.80 Pump Supplies 31680 Helen Homing 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31681 Howard Ridley Company 7.089.00 Digester Repair 31682 William Hughes 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16/00 to 11130/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31683 Todd Hunt 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31684 Charles Hulse 5,519.58 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31685 Mrs.W.Hutchings 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31686 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 10,352.50 Records Management Program 31687 Industrial Distribution Group 2,724A2 Tools&Supplies 31688 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 100.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31689 Victor Iniguez 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Frogman 31690 Irvine Photo Graphics 51.72 Photographic Services 31691 Irvine Ranch Water Dishict 32.24 Water Use 31692 Joe Itson 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31693 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 31694 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade 31695 J&B Auto Pads 117.06 Auto Parts&Supplies 31696 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 484.46 Instrument Supplies 31697 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,641.53 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 31698 Delores James 784.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31699 Jay's Catering 1,714.37 Meeting Expenses 31700 Alejandro Jimenez 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31701 Johnstone Supply 1,007.83 Electrical Supplies 31702 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 5,000.00 Engineering Services 241 31703 Kelly Paper 61.63 Paper 31704 Richard Kelly 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31705 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 3.025.18 Electronic Workstation 31706 Helen Knight 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31707 Betty Kovacevich 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31708 Kreger&Stewart,Inc. 712.00 Professional Services Pl-64 31709 Janae Krol 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31710 Michael Lascan 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31711 Lee&Ro, Inc. 6,409.64 Engineering Consulting Services P2-39 31712 Robert Lawis 262.84 Rewnciliation User Fee Program 31713 Liebert Cassidy 4,156.26 Professional Services-Human Resources 31714 Gerald R.Jones 5.508.83 Professional Services-DART MO 9.22-99 31715 Lucci's 72.75 Meeting Expense 31716 George Luna 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31717 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. 645.80 Engineering Services P"6 31718 Kate Magda 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31719 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2.549.21 Mechanical Supplies 31720 Marine Research&Educational Products 148.16 Lab Supplies 31721 MarVac Electronics 34.10 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31722 Howard McGraw, 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31723 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 95.49 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 31724 Medlin Controls Co. 2,644.55 Instrument Supplies 31725 Mellon Trust 18,543.00 Investment Custodian Bank 31726 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,719.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31727 Mission Uniform Service 2,775.61 Uniform Rentals 31728 Mobile Mini, Inc 79.74 Storage Bins Rental Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid From 11116I00 to 11/30100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31729 Moreland&Associates 2,737.67 Auditing Services MO 3-0-95 31730 Daniel Morgan 80.26 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31731 Richard Moriarty 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31732 MotoPhoto 72.47 Photographic Services 31733 MAP 11,640.00 Management Consulting Service 31734 MCR Technologies, Inc. 546.93 Electrical Pens&Supplies 31735 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 31736 Neal Supply Co. 908.06 Plumbing Supplies 31737 Sandra Neely 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31738 Doi Nguyen 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31739 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 13,644.80 Lubdcent/Diesel Fuel 31740 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 21,720.74 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 31741 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mall Delivery Service 31742 NAPA,Inc. 365.00 Membership 31743 Guy Oakes 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31744 Office Depot Business Services Div. 208.87 Office Supplies 31745 OhmarWEGA Corp. 736.28 Repairs&Maintenance Service 31746 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 489.31 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31747 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.DD Maintenance&Testing of Fire Sprinkler System 31748 Oxygen Service Company 1,894.33 Specialty Gases 31749 OCB Reprographics 3,825.90 Printing Service-MO 1126100 31750 OCE-USA, Inc. 306.16 Computer Equipment Maim, 31751 Pacific Bell 1,128.91 Telephone Services 31762 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 31753 Pacific Mechanical Supply 396.03 Plumbing Supplies 31764 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 997.05 Electrical Supplies 31755 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 5.843.66 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 31766 Pagenet 2,604.23 Paging Services 31757 Dennis Paquette 672.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31758 Parker Supply Company 2.742.95 Mechanical Pens It Supplies 31769 Daisy Pavel 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31760 Bennie Pedraza 985.49 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31761 Lawrence Pedrosa 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31762 Luclo Perez 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31763 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 497.55 Lab Supplies 31764 Mary Peter 153.59 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31765 Erik Peterson 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31766 Pitney Bowes 365.28 Postage Machine Service Agreement 31767 Power Gifts 2,115.87 Printing 31768 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 31769 Cambridge Integrated Service 6,250.00 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 31770 Richard Price 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31771 Primary Source 11.693.12 Office Furniture 31772 Propipe 2,325.00 CCTV Seweriine Inspection 31773 Ralph Provost 94.51 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31774 Pump Engineering Wor O Air 87.41 Pump Supplies Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16100 to 11130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31775 R. L Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosclids Consulting Services 31778 Keith Rauch 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31777 Wesley Reed 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31778 Sara Rehms 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31779 Reliastar 14,525.44 Employee Medical Health Premium 31780 Restek Carp 250.95 Lab Supplies 31781 Gloria Riggs 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31762 Carolyn Robledo 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31783 Xavier Rodriguez 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31784 RPM Electric Motors 209.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31785 Sancon Engineering, Inc 2,102.50 Construction -Sewer Line Cleaning 31786 Loretta Sandoval 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31787 Dennis Sandoval 985AS Reconciliation User Fee Program 31788 Joseph Savor 965.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31789 Kenneth Schmaling 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31790 Edwin Schreiber 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31791 Schwing America,Inc. 3.560.70 Pump Supplies 31792 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 157.90 Tools 31793 Michael Shoemaker 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31794 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 46.43 Tools/Hardware 31795 Siarnon,Larsen&Marsh 4,500.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watership Grp.&Chino Basin$1.500 Transfer 31796 Supalco, Inc. 2,491.67 Lab Supplies 31797 Kenneth Sime 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31798 Robert Simpson 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31799 James Smith 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31800 Philip Smith 1,884.83 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31801 Laurie Snodgrass 234.63 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31802 Richard Snyder 234.63 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31603 So.Cal.Gas Company 4.59 Natural Gas 31804 Henry Soto 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31805 Michael Spero 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31806 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 85.00 Carpet Cleaning 31807 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 630.69 Janitorial Supplies 31808 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 1,149.33 COP Trustee Services 31809 Robert Stemler 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31810 Jack Strediman 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31811 Strata International, Inc. 605.46 Chemicals 31812 Stryper Technologies 16,172.08 Computers-11 VAX Workstations 31813 Sunset Industrial Parts 84.47 Mechanical Supplies 31814 Kay Suzuki 985.46 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31815 SCAP 20.00 Administration Meeting Expense W816 Jamie Teran 87.86 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31817 Tetra Tech,Inc. 17,329.75 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 31818 The Meniwood Corporation 2,256.15 Professional Services-Biosclids Land Inspection 31819 Conrad Thomison 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31820 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 902.83 Mechanical Supplies Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16/00 to 11/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31821 Janice Thompson 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31822 Time Warner Communications 45.47 Cable Services 31823 Daily Pilot 112.50 Notices&Ads 31824 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 37.95 Locks&Keys 31825 TCH Associates,Inc. 4.185.66 Lab Supplies 31826 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.282.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 31827 Ultra Scientific 39.70 Lab Supplies 31828 United Parcel Service 56.82 Parcel Services 31829 University of Southern California 300.00 Publication 31830 Unocal 76 96.11 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 Inspection 31831 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.188.84 Plumbing Supplies 31832 Varian 67.75 Lab Supplies 31833 Robert Vaughan 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31834 Veme's Plumbing 60.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 31835 John Vickery 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31536 Victor Vidal 1,063.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31837 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.342.90 Vision Service Premium 31838 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5.304.36 Lab Supplies 31839 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,711.28 Security Guards 31840 Allen Wagner 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31841 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 568.00 Wind Sock Frame 31842 Western States Chemical,Inc. 19,105.44 Caustic Soda MO8-23-95 31843 Francis Wilke 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31844 Rebecca Winik 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31845 William Wisner 910.78 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31846 David Worcester 9a5A8 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31847 John Worrell 985.48 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31848 Xerox Corporation 4,191.81 Copier Leases 31849 Scott Yams] 599.77 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31850 Susan Zamudio 985.40 Reconciliation User Fee Pragram 31851 Milton Ead Ziebarth 985.40 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31852 Southern Contracting Company 11,539.00 Construction J-33.1 31853 Union Bank of California 3,084.10 Construction P146-2&J-53,Retention 31854 Barbara A.Collins 140.67 Meetingrfmining Expense Reimbursement 31855 Robert J.Thistle 1,138.11 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 31856 Yu-Li Tsai 583.28 Meeting7frain]ng Expense Reimbursement 31857 Simon L.Watson 135.00 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 31858 CSMFO 25.00 Review Fee-OCSD Financial Report 31859 Government Finance Officers Association 480.00 Review Fee-OCSD Financial Report 31860 Steven E.Howard 3,OOD.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 31861 Orange County Sanitation District 1,571.52 Petty Cash Reimb. 31862 Richard Reeves 2,492.19 Employee Computer Loan Program 31863 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt.Dist. 190.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 31864 American Express 30,117.24 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services 31865 Ark Construction Company 26,432.50 Construction J-55 31866 RPI/Bio Gro 88,862.51 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16/00 to 11130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31867 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 106,889.12 Engineering Services J-77 31868 Boyle Engineering Corporation 93.911.70 Engineering Services 1-24.2-31,2-50,3-35-1 31869 Brown&Caldwell 287,331.26 Engineering Services 241 31870 Carollo Engineers 75,552.15 Engineering Services P143,P2.50,P2-50,P2-66 31871 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 35,788.45 Engineering Services J-71-1,2&Dairy Washwater Pilot Project 31872 Computerized Facility Intergretlan 123,933.65 Engineering Service J-25-1 31873 CH2M Hill 86,077.29 Engineering Service J-714 31874 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 271,428.72 Computers-118 Computers,48 Monitors&Software 31876 Delta Dental 47,338.66 Dental Insurance Plan 31876 Flo-Systems,Inc. 27,729.46 Pump Supplies 31877 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 25,396.72 Electrical Supplies&Services 31878 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 170.183.60 Engineering Services J-35-2 31879 Polydyne,Inc. 42.662.45 Colonic Polymer MO 3-11-92 31880 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 86,630.84 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 31881 Southern California Edison 32,196.03 Power 31862 Tule Ranch/Megan Fans 91,113.65 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 31883 Vulcan 39.917.47 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 31884 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 54,236.05 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 31885 J W Contracting Corporation 178,373.00 Construction P2.80 31886 Margate Construction,Inc. 284.471.00 Construction P2-39 31887 Olsson Construction,Inc. 51,112.00 Construction J52 31888 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 58,597.79 Construction Pi-46-2&J-53 31889 Orange County Sanitation District 430,946.68 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 31890 City of Seal Beach 41.439.60 Cooperative Projects Reimbursement Program 31891 A.B.I.N.I.P.Attorney Service 80.00 Legal Services-Tren vs. Kovacs 31892 Great American Printing Co. 222.44 Printing 31893 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 91.38 Mechanical Supplies 31894 Aurora Data Systems 1.70.00 Software Mainl.Agreement 31895 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 29.37 Telephone Service 31896 Calif Regional Water Quality Board 1,000.00 Construction 241 -Permit Fes 31897 City of Placentia 7,500.00 Construction J-13 31898 Cooper Energy Services 9,083.88 Engine Supplies 31899 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 76.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31900 CWEA-SSCSC 70.00 O&M Training Registration 31901 CWFA Membership 60.00 Membership 31902 Eberhard Equipment 171.16 Auto Parts&Supplies 31903 City of Fountain Valley 241.82 Construction Pi-37-Permit Fee for Underground Fuel Storage Tank 31904 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 31905 Fry's Electronics 1.173.98 Computer Supplies 31906 Global Environmental Network, Inc. 435.00 O&M Training Registration 31907 Greybar Electric Company 399.18 Electrical Supplies 31908 Hach Company 7,316.86 Lab Supplies 31909 Herman Lehrer Trust 3,515.12 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31910 Industrial Metal Supply 453.69 Metal 31911 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16/00 to 11/30/00 y Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31912 Lab Safely Supply, Inc. 193.60 Lab Supplies 31913 Lasergraphics 837.37 Equipment Maintenance 31914 McMaster-Care Supply Co. 775.94 Plumbing Pads&Supplies 31915 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5,225.00 Mechanical Parts If Supplies 31916 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 31917 OCEA 520.10 Dues Deduction 31918 Pans Unlimited 239.58 Truck Supplies 31919 PlnnacleOne Institute 750.00 Construction Management Training Registration 31920 Pool Supply of Orange County 415.97 Operating Supplies 31921 PIHRA 90.00 Membership 31922 Santa Fe Industrial Products 3,761.33 Mechanical Supplies 31923 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 142.13 Mechanical Supplies 31924 Shureludk Sales&Engineering 3,397.27 Tools/Hardware 31925 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Dairy Producers Transfer 31926 SOBChoice 3,147.00 Computer Supplies 31927 Southern California Coach 80.00 Board Member Meeting Expense 31928 Summit Steel 142.48 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 31929 Sun-Beg Landscape&Maintenance 7.928.12 Landscape Maint. 31930 SARBS-CWFA 10.00 Membership 31931 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 757.43 Plumbing Supplies 31932 Tap Shelf Cleaning Service 3,275.00 Easement Weed Abatement 31933 United Way 472.50 Employee Contnbu9ons 31934 V.T.C. Partnership 1.450.66 Reconciliation User Fee Program 31935 Vulcan 11,331.16 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 31936 Chuck M. Forman 168.20 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 31937 Deirdre E. Hunter 443.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31938 Jeffrey L.Jones 821.42 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 31939 Tom B. Meregillano 242.25 MeeUngrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31940 Michael D.Moore 338.91 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31941 Canh O. Nguyen 498.75 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31942 Robert Coten 568.19 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31943 William F. Pierce 137.21 Mee0ngrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31944 Jeffrey T.Reed 853.41 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31945 Orlando A.Taints 249.67 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 31946 Lisa L.Tomko 638.21 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,745,783.59 Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/16/00 to 11/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 21341 -21454 Employee Paychecks $ 170,158.47 Biweekly Payroll 11/29/00 21455-21455 Employee Paycheck 193.58 Interim Paycheck-Standby Pay Adjustment 55490-55939 Direct Deposit Statements 726,269.71 Biweekly Payroll 11/29/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 896.621.78 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co. of CA 786,303.07 November Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Whe Transfer Payments $ 786.303.07 Total Claims Paid 11/16/00-11/30/00 $ 5,428,708.42 Page 10 of 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeebngD TOB°•of°" 12/20/00 AGENDA REPORT Hem Number Item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD -15, PARCEL MAP 98-233 ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from Brian Kerr requesting annexation of 2.25 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Wilderness Avenue in the City of Orange; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-31, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD -15, Parcel Map 98-233 Annexation). SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District(District) received a request from Brian Kerr to annex 2.25 acres, consisting of two lots, to the District. The lots are located at 10301 and 10321 Meads Avenue. The property is in Revenue Area No. 7. The property owner is building a single-family house on each lot. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. Brian Kerr previously paid the LAFCO processing fee of $1,150.00 directly to LAFCO. The fee of$15,112.00 includes the following: District Processing Fee $500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $350.00 Revenue Area Study Fee $200.00 Notice of Exemption Filing Fee $43.00 Annexation Acreage Fee $8.959.00 Permit House Connection Fee (5 bedrooms) at 10301 Meads Avenue $2,530.00 Permit House Connection Fee (5 bedrooms) at 10321 Meads Avenue $2,530.00 TOTAL FEE TO ANNEX $15,112.00 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT , ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated after the District consolidation. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS Exempt (Notice of Exemption was filed on 11/6/00). ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:jak R1wp.dla%agendMBoard Agenda Repoda12=Board Agenda ReporlsU 2DOZem 9(a).doe Page 2 W. I BLOCK: 6053 2 MODULE:25 3 EXHIBIT"A" 4 5 OCSD-15, PARCEL MAP 98-233 ANNEXATION 6 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 (REORGANIZATION No. RO M110) 8 9 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 10 AND BEING ALL OF PARCEL MAP 98-233 RECORDED IN BOOK 313 PAGES 7 THROUGH 8, I 1 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, 12 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 13 14 COMMENCING AT POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE OLD CENTERLINE OF SANTIAGO CANYON 15 ROAD AND MEADS AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233, SAID POINT BEING ALSO 16 AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 17 DISTRICT,AS ESTABLISHED BY ANNEXATION No.30(TRACT No. 6232 TO ORANGE COUNTY 18 SANITATION DISTRICT No.7)SAID ANGLE POINT BEING THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER 19 OF SAID ANNEXATION No. 30 AND THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE 20 THEREIN DESCRIBED AS NORTH 81'1600'EAST 724.70 FEET.THENCE,ALONG SAID EXISTING 21 DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINE AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID ANNEXATION No. 30 22 SOUTH 08e28'30"EAST 403.85 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.SAID TRUE POINT OF 23 BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 81'31'30"EAST 30.00 FEET FROM THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY 24 CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233. SAID POINT ALSO BEARS SOUTH O8'51'26" EAST 424.02 25 FEET FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION G.P.S. No. 26 3219 HAVING COORIDINATE VALUE(U.S. SURVEY FOOT)OF NORTH 2243305.129 AND EAST 27 6097318.934 BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM(CCS83),ZONE VI, 1983 NAD 28 (1991.35 EPOCH O.C.S.GPS ADJUSTMENT)AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233. THENCE 29 LEAVING THE EXISTING ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOUNDARY SOUTH 81'31'30" 30 WEST 30.00 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233. 31 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233 SOUTH 78'06'30' 32 WEST 35.90 FEET; THENCE,SOUTH 50054'30"WEST 147.19 FEET;THENCE,NORTH BW30'30' 33 WEST 60.00 FEET;THENCE,SOUTH 58'6630'WEST 61.60 FEET.THENCE ALONG.THE 34 WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP W233 SOUTH 8'2631"EAST 279.61 FEET. 35 THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233 NORTH 81'3110" 36 EAST 276.45 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233, 37 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF 38 SAID PARCEL MAP 98-233 NORTH 81'31'30'EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING 39 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOUNDARY.SAID POINT ALSO LYING SOUTH 8'28'30' 40 EAST 361.88 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.THENCE ALONG THE SAID EXISTING 41 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOUNDARY NORTH 8.28'30'WEST 361.88 FEET TO 42 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 43 44 THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 2.2489 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 PAGE 1 n�ene�.�s�. ro.e..imcaoa enM"wpaeo< I OCSD-15, PARCEL MAP 98-233 ANNEXATION 2 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - - - - 3 (REORGANIZATION No. RO 00-10) 4 5 6 ATTACHED AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF IS A MAP DESIGNATED AS 7 EXHIBIT'B' 8 9 10 II 12 /fir 13 14 15 16 v 17 THE L IPTION AND ATTACHED MAP WAS 18 PREP CTION R � CKRE 19 20 :S 21 RNS R.C.E.19593 23 EXP.9-30-2001 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION DOES MEET THE APPROVAL 36 OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE 37 38 D H DAY OF _,2000 39 40 41 J U OR P.L.S.4408 42 CENSE EXP ES 1 43 44 45 46 �'` uCNy„ �9AF 47 48 >` wo. Qw v 49 50 �ygsp+ 4r 5152 * �� 53 ?tOFCn 54 55 PAGE 2 ' O,B,lem\Swrer NvwxamUBd BrlmbVepe.O¢ -, AP EXHIBIT "B" S.P.S. Sutton MIS ]xe za 3M.Ta OCSD-38, PARCEL MAP No. 98-233 ANNEXATION Fan T�fe.»a TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT J1€ DM1NE14Na4ICAP 01 (REORGANIZATION NO. RO 00-E0T a a P L AEF a3- 1 9agzSS.'NEFP�Y.e�". lfa -a nR OR na4SwIA00 CANTIM ]^p,aA 09.DIRA '1.9T' f �e 4$C\ Cttr C\ Nfrlpu"E CAN a Z< �l ARTo ^�..._.•..r.•.._..+.r4/...^._._.� .T .. �d y �� tszl !NN➢ SAHTi PGO (yp Lpp p icbR +� Diu sN+lun DISTR(0T LOANS, P"�YT 90-Y3aCDR1RN EYlsnac«so Sauxsanr ��-�S��tg1 6NNEIATIDN BOUNDARY 99 p¢ 1 KS¢ITR�L�Y� LINE IS AMCOROE�TR633Yf TD D.GS.D. Na.T ,.D� i0.007 SD•¢ I . oa xao.]o ]a•N 'A x fttOERNQ _._:-.._ Y Yen`b0 NOIIfiHRLY LITR OF P.N. 9{-233 a TIDN Nw ]D p' I,� aORWD TR.css 1 y I TE5 TD�S.�c.s.o. IN d•"dF:,Ps.?'$ .?i.?,:'1� .i"s. .:.^N'-FF."-.. i ao' Y f x svfrm• e J� 12.2489 ACRES) } c $ FASKRLY EINF rt (I/ MESTERLY LINE 6i P.N. 98413 aa•n' --- - --- y SDUTNEALY ANSI 0 P.M. 11,41! \ PT PREPaR[n ly,X IN EN¢INEER)NO 1213 6. MPNAN AYF. SPIRE 2 1 MAN Ca 9YSB6 iN14 R TNf SWFRYISIDH DPf F� 9J0- t _ _ - - _ yy t 1 THIS M DD[S YEEi TMF 1PMpVµ ,p{Cy, ry - �� RANOALt 5 THE MAWE COYNiY SIMYEYfM'a DPE ICQ. a' b �a aTDATE 9Nts�MA a V,3m .2m . ♦ Qw.aw. � W ICF •EN NASA 9130/3WIP.l.3. Na0a N ng Date To N.of or. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 12/20/00 AGENDA REPORT fOem Numbe Item sc(otb) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD —16. TRACT 15565 ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from Cal-Rio requesting annexation of 8.08 acres to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Old Ranch Road in the City of Anaheim; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-32, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex Tract 15565 to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD -16, Tract 15565 Annexation). SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) received a request from Cal-Rio to annex 8.08 acres, consisting of 11 lots, to the District. The lots are located on South Country Hill Road. Each lot will connect to an existing 8 inch City of Anaheim sewer. The City of Anaheim will collect all District sewer house connection fees for each lot. The property is in Revenue Area No. 2. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of$35,858.00 includes the following: District Processing Fee $500.00 LAFCO Processing Fee $2,350.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $500.00 Notice of Exemption Filing Fee $43.00 Annexation Acreage Fee $32,465.00 TOTAL FEE TO ANNEX $35,858.00 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated after the District consolidation. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Exempt (Notice of Exemption was filed on 1116/00). ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:jak HA .dtaragendWBoard Agenda Repods@000 Board Agenda Reportstl 200Vtem 9(b).doc Page 2 1: 1' 1 BLOCK:6154 2 MODULE: 52 AND 62 3 EXHIBIT"A" 4 5 OCSD-16,TRACT No. 15565 ANNEXATION No.OCSD 00-04 6 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 8 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,COUNTY OF ORANGE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AND BEING ALL OF 9 TRACT 15W5 RECORDED IN BOOK 802 PAGES 44 THROUGH 46 INCLUSIVE OF 10 MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,AND I 1 BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 12 13 BEGINNING AT A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EXISTING 14 BOUNDARY OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT(OCSO),AS ESTABLISHED BY 15 ANNEXATION No. 16(A PORTION OF TRACT 8560 TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 16 No.2)SAID POINT LIES SOUTH 46"03'22"EAST 119.39 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 17 TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE SHOWN AS NORTH 46"03'22"WEST 356.78 FEET ON 18 SAID ANNEXATION No. 16. SAID POINT ALSO BEARS NORTH 38"42'59"EAST 1618.77 FEET FROM 19 THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION G.P.S.3255 HAVING A 20 COORDINATE VALUE(U.S. SURVEY FOOT)OF NORTH 2255118.528 AND EAST 6102122.553 21 BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM(CCS83),ZONE VI, 1983 NAD(1991.35 22 EPOCH O.C.S.GPS ADJUSTMENT)AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT MAP 15565. SAID POINT ALSO 23 BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT MAP 15565.THENCE ALONG THE 24 SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT MAP 15565 AND ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY 25 OCSD BOUNDARY PER SAID ANNEXATION No. 16,THE FOLLOWING COURSES:SOUTH 45"10'51" 26 EAST 237.39 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 41"2T51"EAST 33.79 FEET,THENCE LEAVING SAID OCSD 27 BOUNDARY AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY, SOUTHEASTERLY AND 28 NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT 15665 THE FOLLOWING COURSES; SOUTH 41"27'51" 29 EAST 287.13 FEET.THENCE, NORTH 56"05'09'EAST 724.12 FEET;THENCE NORTH BD'33'51" 30 WEST 276.89 FEET:THENCE NORTH 67"56'51'WEST 206.45 FEET;THENCE,NORTH 32021'51" 31 WEST 136.58 FEET;THENCE, NORTH 17052'51"WEST 232.65 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF 32 COUNTRY HILL ROAD(40.00 FEET WIDE)AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT 15585.THENCE ALONG 33 SAID CENTERLINE OF COUNTRY HILL ROAD NORTH 86-0i'D9"EAST 30.91 FEET.THENCE 34 LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF COUNTRY HILL ROAD SOUTH 16"24'24'EAST 194.09 35 FEET;THENCE, SOUTH 07°43'58'WEST 81.63 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 59"51'09"WEST 36.31 FEET: 36 THENCE SOUTH 56"09'10"WEST 466.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 37 38 THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 8.077 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 PAGE OF 53 54 55 DWN370 1111110.SBww�m",e1gM11861 CeIANMEfWLEx I OCSD-18.TRACT No. 15565 ANNEXATION No.OGSD OO-04 2 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 3 4 5 ATTACHED AND 13Y THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF IS A MAP DESIGNATED AS 6 EXHISIT'S" 7 8 9 10 II 12 �4\ 1314 15 16 THE LEGAL CRIPTION AND ATTACHED MAP WAS 1'323 17 PREP R DIRECTION 18 19 4tG1:2.Zp� ^nre 20 . KERNS R.C.E. 19593 2 EXP.9-30-2001 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 THI LEGAL DESCRIPTION DOES MEET THE APPROVAL 35 OF E ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE 36 37 DAT THI DAY OF \ TL .2000 38 39 40 JOHN O OR P.L.S.4408 41 MY LI ESE EXPIRES 9/30 001 42 43 44 PAGE 2OF2 s�S2`0�UAio Ci14e. G'Fs°v Fa s 1q, 4/0B OFCI� DUN370 1N 1559S8wa MCANImU18fl0 GIAb'e4EGRl.Coc U®YL8 8l3IAIm WE EXHIBIT "e' OCSD-16• TRACT No.15565 ANNEXATION No.00SD 00-04 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT �4.OLD RANCH ROAD i \ x. 0. 0 E CD NTRY HILL ROAD i6 / SIT 1 565 )/ t 9UZ ,/ 415M y�tM SGq YPl6 t9Y 6 ti t OE iN S �P 1 6.P.4. )te9 V tEPMBLN P4 NIB O3 NDRTNINO 3.241I ESTINE 22.553 FOUND P =601E AND 6ND •P E. '25" 4TIYPFD R.C.E. J` 125BB' 'LUSH LMATEO AT THE IMERSECTI WI Of CANYON \+ "IN AM AND VIA CORRAL AS p• � BEOIHNINO 4NORN PER TRACT ISS65. Y.B.BO2/I<-I6 PO1MT q J1 y�•pP 141e lT \ ti `7ryp� L\� TIE ,\ \ IAA POORTION lqc�ON Of 16 u 356.09.1p•V TI RECOIOED TRACT I64,pA, SH ti Pj TOW 3� ec65O1D.Ne.2 NORTHEASTERLY LINE OPANEXATION -A I" N .I6 IPMTIDN RECD . TPACT Yp BSBDI TO O.C.S.D. N0.3 `� 459•!1'O4•X IP.l1' �N SC1.21'41'E IS.I!' IN02.30MR ANIRY. 11P..1,, A®®ESSORO PARCEL No. 866-676-96 4x e A�f 9 �®g�aa.a s g 6.077+/- ACRES L r1N•nl .. 1. �. �'E:9 ELNWI LT. am.1///// NVAwim ANRNNM1 ulb NR AO PREPARED BY: $YRIN EMINEERIND R yNM1 Y 315 E. MAPNAN AVE. SUITE 2 THIS NAP MES MEET THE APPROVAL Of ,}T ORANGE CA. 92966 THE DEC SURVEYOR'' PICE PAIEMCN$.I' TrIE I ER LNE SUPERVISION OPt OATFD T Y M .i000 r LL f RNS R.C.E. 19595 BY EXP. 9-IO-2001 J 9 M P.L.5.0<OR NY L CENSE EXP 6 / D/NODI PAGE 1 01 1 t DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, November 15, 2000 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, November 15, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Norm Eckenrode, Chair Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peter Green, Vice Chair Director John Gullixson Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Steve Anderson, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT: Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Blake Anderson, General Manager Jan Debay, Past Chair of the Board Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Gary Streed, Director of Finance Directors Absent: Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jim Silva, County Supervisor Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 25, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode reported on several items. A. Meeting with Tony Oliveira: Blake Anderson and Chair Eckenrode drove to Hanford in the middle of Kings County on November 3. Mr. Oliveira has been on the Board for several years and is very pro-farming, pro-business and relatively anti-regulation—like many of his colleagues on the board. The Kings County Board will be considering a biosolids ordinance next week. Mr. Oliveira told us that he is currently in favor of the use of Class B biosolids, as long as there are w Minutes of the Steering Committee n Page 2 November 15, 2000 reasonable safe guards in place. The District agreed with that and that it takes environmental stewardship seriously—including the use of blosolids in Kings County. He said that he expected the Board to approve an ordinance that Includes the use of Class B biosolids, at least for the short term. He does not believe there is scientific evidence against using Class B biosolids. He also expressed personal and philosophical discomfort and concern about Orange County and Los Angeles County buying land in Kings County, but is also willing to live with the practice because it's a matter of property owners having the right to sell their land to whomever they chose. B. Chair Eckenrode reported on the two-day planning retreat of CASA on October 26 and 27.The retreat was held at the Pardee Reservoir training center owned by the East Bay Municipal Utilities District. Jim Colston, staff member, also attended. The purpose of the meeting was to go over the internal workings of CASA. Of most significance was a decision to give full membership status to California cities that want to join CASA. Up until now, cities like Los Angeles, San Diego,and Fresno have not been allowed to have full membership and voting privileges in CASA. Only special districts had that privilege. This change recognizes the need to have a common and strong voice from all of the public agencies that provide sewage treatment in California C. Chair Eckenrode announced that the winter CASA conference is scheduled for January 17-20 in Palm Springs. All members of the Steering Committee are encouraged to attend. If there are openings,other interested directors may attend (up to seven total)if members of the Steering Committee cannot attend. D. Chair Eckenrode also reminded the Committee members about the bipartisan lunch on December 14 here at the District. He has invited elected representatives from Sacramento and Washington, D.C. The purpose of the meeting will be to conduct a bipartisan discussion of local urban runoff and upstream dairy runoff,tainted beaches,watershed management and the ground water replenishment system Invited guests include: Joe Dunn, Dick Ackerman, Lou Correa, Lynn Daucher, Tom Hannon, Loretta Sanchez, Christopher Cox, Dana Rohrabacher, Ken Emanuels (the lobbyist worked with us on consolidation issues), Ed Royce,Scott Baugh and Supervisor Tom Wilson. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported several items of interest. A. An update was provided by Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services,on Kern County and Kings County biosolids issues. No action will be taken on the purchase of Liberty Farms until the biosolids ordinance is adopted. If Class B biosolids are allowed, then due diligence will continue. The court has not ruled p Minutes of the Steering Committee 6 Page 3 November 15, 2000 on the Kern County biosolids ordinance CEQA challenge. Mr. Ghirelll reported that EPA is getting more Involved with the enforcement of biosolids application requirements. The milo harvest on the District's Kings County property is almost complete. B. Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager, updated the committee on the status of the public outreach program for the GWRS project. The Joint Coordination Committee(JCC)meets next Monday night to discuss financial and governance issues. Director Swan made a presentation at the last FAHR Committee meeting on the IRWD alternative proposal. Gary Streed reported on his meeting today with the project's financial consultant. A draft report has been prepared. The assumptions will be discussed at the next JCC meeting and the results will be reported at the December 2 workshop. Staff was directed to provide time on the workshop agenda for Director Swan to make a shortened presentation on the IRWO alternative proposal. General Manager Blake Anderson indicated that new Directors will receive special briefings on the project before the January 24, 2001 decision is made. C. The Committee received an update on the SARI line relocation project. The design is underway with construction scheduled to start in the Fall of 2001 and completion scheduled In 2003. Because some of the lots adjacent to the project are terraced and the lower portions extend closer to the river than previously thought, 69 easements will be required. Staff will be meeting with Yorba Linda city officials to discuss this and determine the best way to proceed. The biggest issue Is still the funding of the SAWPA portion of the project. Mr. Anderson met with two SAWPA Board members who appear to understand the need for the project. The chair, vice chair and general manager of SAWPA have asked to meet with the District's counterparts. This meeting should take place in the next three weeks. D. Blake Anderson reported on the 2.1/2 day executive management retreat held last week to discuss the five-year business and staffing plan. He reported that the plan will move through the Board committees on its way to the Board at its February 2001 meeting for consideration and approval. E. Senate Bill 1559 was approved by the governor in July and will be effective January 1, 2001. This bill allows increases in Sanitation District Directors' compensation by a resolution of the Board of Directors. This board has not had an Increase since 1986. The existing compensation is $100 per meeting and is limited to 6 meetings per month. The Steering Committee directed staff to bring the issue through the FAHR Committee in December on its way to the full Board in December. The members recommended that the compensation be Increased to$170 per meeting for a maximum of six meetings per month. F. Bob Ghirelli briefed the Committee on the results of a new technical report on the Huntington Beach bacterial contamination problems that will be released to the public and announced in a formal press conference tomorrow. Mr. Ghirelli explained the results and also Indicated that the District will continue with additional studies identified in the report, as well as others that are currently Q Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 1 November 15, 2000 underway. Staff still believes that the plume is not the cause of the contamination as the report hypothesizes. A team has been formed to put together a plan for the additional studies that will begin next spring,as well as bringing in the same experts previously consulted to help develop that plan. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. He indicated that there would be no closed session as nothing has developed in the Crow Winthrop claim since the last meeting. (8) DISCUSSION ITEM (Item A) A. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in December was reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for December 20, 2000 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for December 20, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. a Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 November 15, 2000 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. bmitted by: Tappan V to ring Committee Secretary n:i»n.madee�m�veeme cunmmeswowowm+++soo sc rn:,uiueoc Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2000-5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 6, 2000, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Staff Present: Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Jan Debay, Past Board Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Don Bankhead Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Charles E. Sylvia Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Paul Walker Robert Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Directors Absent: Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Pat McGuigan, Chair Barbara Collins, Senior Analyst Mark A. Murphy Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Anna Piercy Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLICCOMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the November 1, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 December 6, 20DO (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager, Blake Anderson, reported he, Chairman Eckenrode and Andrei loan of our staff met with the General Manager and Chairman of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) regarding the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) and the costs involved with that relocation. SAWPA does not have the funds to pay for their approximate 75% share of the relocation costs, and does not anticipate raising their rates to help offset the costs. SAWPA has asked the District to delay construction of the project for at least one year and encouraged the District to find state and federal funding for the project. SAWPA indicated they would provide the District with help in securing the funds. Mr. Anderson reminded the Directors of the Legislators' Day luncheon for our Orange County legislators from Sacramento and Washington, D.C. It will be held at the District on Thursday, December 14, to discuss various water issues such as urban runoff, watershed protection, regulatory issues and the groundwater replenishment system. All Directors were encouraged to attend. A brief report was then given on a new 5-year staffing plan that has been developed over the last several months. The staffing plan will be presented to the committees and the Board for approval in February 2001. The plan will be requesting an increase of approximately 4% in staff due to increasing regulatory issues, cooperative projects and an aggressive capital improvement program the District is undertaking. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance, Bob Ooten, reported on the drastic increase (nearly five fold) in natural gas prices. The natural gas price increase has caused a change in the operation of the District's power generation plants. The power plant production is being turned down to reduce the purchase of natural gas. This will imply an increase in our use (and cost) of electricity. Annual total cost increase for electricity and natural gas is estimated to be about$1.4 million greater than budgeted for FYOO-01. The operational strategy to buy electricity instead of natural gas, though, is saving the District about$250,000 per month for the next three months. Staff is looking into fuel cell technology, solar, and wind energy as possible alternative energy sources in the future. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirelli, reported on the Kern County ordinance the District had challenged in court. The judge ruled against the District on all counts. The District's attorney is recommending an appeal be filed but no decision has been made yet. He further reported that Kings County is also considering an ordinance of the same type that Kern County has adopted which would eventually ban Class B biosolids. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 December 6, 2000 (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTSOD-42 Recommend to Board of Directors to authorize the Purchasing Manager to solicit bids and award one or more blanket purchase orders for repetitively ordered Laboratory Supplies, (Specification No. S-77), in an aggregate amount not to exceed $150,000 per year, to include four one- year renewal options. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. b. OMTS00-43 Authorize staff to enter into negotiations for a lease contract with Nextel Communications for the construction of a communications and cellular telephone antenna at Plant No. 2, to be approved by the Board of Directors at a future date. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carded to approve staffs recommendation provided that the Engineering Department agrees that the project does not interfere with District projects and that the lease contract is deemed worthy by District management. C. OMTSOO-44 Not used d. OMTSOO-45 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, and the Milk Producers Council (No.AKB-00-015)for a pilot program to sewer dairy wash water to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor providing for language clarification at no additional cost to the District. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve stairs recommendation. (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTSOO-46: Overview of Fleet Management Practices Nick Arhontes gave a brief update and review of the District's fleet management practices and program. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee 4/ Page 4 ; December 6, 2000 b. OMTSDO 41: Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli reported that the final Phase II report was released on November 16. Copies of the full report should be available in December. Staff believes that the District's discharge plume is not the cause of the contamination as the report hypothesizes. A team has been formed to put together a plan for additional studies utilizing impartial scientists that will begin next spring. Estimated costs will be approximately$250,000- $500,000 for the studies and testing. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for February 7, 2000 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: Ae'(4�' //7 A;� Penny M. Ky Operations, aintenance a Technical Services Committee Secretary \radonWatalwp.maWgendal0MTS%20004Anu mkl20800 Minu m.doc OMTS COMMITTEE MeetingD To of Dir. 1IJ06/2000 1I/io/00 AGENDA REPORT IIem Nunn nem Number oMTSDe 2 IWO Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Samuel Mowbray, Laboratory Manager Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: SPECIFICATION NO. S-77, LABORATORY SUPPLIES BLANKET PURCHASE REQUISITION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Purchasing Manager to solicit bids and award one or more blanket purchase orders for repetitively ordered Laboratory Supplies (Specification No. S-77) in an aggregate amount not to exceed $150,000 per year, to include four one-year renewal options. SUMMARY The laboratory routinely requires certain routine operating supplies in an annual amount of approximately $150,000. These items are not stocked in the District warehouse. The approved laboratory budget is inclusive of these items. There are approximately 4 potential major vendors, and previous recent history in soliciting bids for similar routine supplies would predict a savings of 10% to 25% if these items are competitively bid. This will result in an anticipating annual saving to the District of approximately$15,000 to $35,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NA BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the savings on cost of goods, a blanket Purchase Order will reduce staff time in both the laboratory and in purchasing that is required to process routine orders. ALTERNATIVES Continue to order lab supplies from individual vendors Ht.,p evee�ld A911m ReMftwouem,a�urwn.00atuoor.m tz(q.mc e-s.d. � Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS N My OYYperpY9yrp 1geMe Repvb�YJfq Bn�E IyeMe Pepvb\t]UMem 12M.G¢ Qe^� % Page 2 OMTSCOMM1 TEE MeetlnoDxe Tasa.awr. 17/116/mW lym/Ro AGENDA REPORT HernWM Rem femw Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services . Originator: Tadao vtko, Associate Engineer 11 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DAIRY WASHWATER PILOT PROJECT AGREEMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, and the Milk Producers Council (No. AKB-00-015)for a pilot program to sewer dairy wash water to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor providing for language clarification, at no additional cost to the District. SUMMARY The Dairy Washwater Pilot Project agreement, approved by the District Board of Directors on June 28, 2000, was amended in response to comments by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County (WMWD), and Inland Empire Utilities Agency of San Bemardino County (IEUA). The amendment does not change the scope or intent of the original agreement approved by the Sanitation District's Board of Directors. The amendment simply clarifies the language in some of its parts, as follows: Recital L: Specifies that the Waste Discharge Permit issued to the dairies by WMWD and IEUA on behalf of SAWPA will include provisions that the dairies will be responsible for maintaining the connection laterals during the term of the Agreement. Recital M: Specifies that SAWPA will be responsible to carry out any enforcement actions necessary to impose the terms and conditions of the discharge permit issued to each participating dairy, pursuant to the April 1, 1991 Memorandum of Understanding between SAWPA and OCSD. Provides that OCSD will provide monitoring each time a dairy discharges to the SARI (expected to occur twice a year). That any discharge not meeting SAWPA permit requirements will not be allowed to discharge to the SARI. That OCSD will hold SAWPA harmless, and not liable, for any permit violations that result from this Pilot Program (this hold-harmless agreement applies solely to the pilot washwater agreement, not to the 1991 MOU between SAWPA and OCSD— See Letter of Clarification below). And to add to the Waste Discharge Permit a provision to require the dairies to reimburse IEUA, WMWD, OCSD, MPC, and SAWPA for any cost incurred as a result of any enforcement action. Recital T: Specifies that the charges will pass on to the dairies and that the dairies will reimburse IEUA and WMWD and that SAWPA will adjust the cost of discharge to the dairies for the second and third years of this Agreement. The adjusted rate will be M'Wy.G W.W 1 MA,y WF>\Ml NSW R.pom\I]C 12(Q,. R.A . 11.1M Page 1 charged to IEUA and WMWD who in turn will pass on this cost increase/decrease to the participating dairies. r Recital U: Specifies that SARI pipeline capacity will be provided by SAWPA, IEUA, and WMWD on a temporary basis for the term of this Agreement conditioned to the availability of unassigned capacity (owner capacity that has not been committed by purchase or lease agreement to another entity)for their respective service areas. Recital V: New section that specifies that OCSD will provide temporary treatment capacity for up to four million gallons per dairy per year. The SARI wastewater treatment capacity can be increased/decreased by OCSD during the term of the Agreement Project Manager Assignment: Change name of the project manager for SAWPA. Scope of Work and Responsibilities, Section 2.E: Adds that SAWPA, through the Waste Discharge Permit, authorizes OCSD to act on its behalf to take any action to enforce the dairy discharge permit(s), pursuant to the April 1, 1991, Memorandum of Understanding, between SAWPA and OCSD. Scope of Work and Responsibilities, Section 2F: Specifies that the costs imposed on dairies for the second and third years will be imposed for specific discharges based on the monitoring reports prepared by the dairies and that the adjusted rate will be charged to IEUA and WMWD, who in turn will pass this cost increase/decrease on to the participating dairies. Scope of Work and Responsibilities, Section 2H: Clarifies that OCSD will notify the Orange County Water District in advance of a dairy monitoring event so that they may collect and analyze additional samples. The results of this additional monitoring must be shared with the OCSD. Also clarifies that the monitoring by OCSD will occur each time a dairy discharges to the SARI and that OCSD will continue to bill SAWPA on a quarterly basis for the disposal costs for flow, BOD, and TSS delivered at the SAWPA flow meter/monitoring location at the county line, pursuant to the July 24, 1996 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement. Invoice adjustments must reflect the write-off of any surcharge costs applicable to the pilot program above or below the rate in effect with the dairies for the period of this Agreement. Letter of Clarification: A letter was signed by SAWPA clarifying the intent of the language of the Amendment (specifically Section 2.E) in regards to amend or modify the April 1, 1991, Memorandum of Understanding, between SAWPA and OCSD. The language in Section 2.E is intended to simply reflect that it is SAWPA's preference and desire that OCSD act on SAWPA's behalf in enforcing the dairy discharge permits pursuant to the April 1, 1991 Memorandum of Understanding between SAWPA and OCSD. hro duma•'d.�,a n,.nda a.,od.w "o nd.,m I Ildl d- a-,.,d ,,.,,m Page 2 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY u This is a no cost amendment to the original agreement for the dairy washwater project. The District's costs associated with this project, as spelled out in the agreement, are as follows: • $15,000 for sewer connection design (one-lime cost). $2,300 per dairy per year approximate laboratory costs. The total cost to Orange County Sanitation District will be no more than $35,000 per year. The District's Board of Directors previously approved these cost. The pilot project agreement will terminate on June 30, 2003. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES No action would delay the project further. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Dairy Washwater Agreement Letter X 1vq.Emlapee ..�peM]flegRc\2YOBovN/.pmN 0.epvt5\t2lOdem 1$lal.arc nsn.ee. 1117no Page 3 q - AKLUFI �jWYSOGKI '�DL W .�PHOH 'f wv o L�_mrsxu maul aaz.seao A T T 0 0. N E Y 5 A T L A m V, _.�-• , R b '�• Y 'T��aN11lC4,AtLbH'•rnqur�. ..•.�ApIMH..�.., ..---. W ]e0] TENtH STREET. 3URE fi10 190D1 Baz-zer� RrvEw�oe. uuwRH,w arw� ff t4 U L. NOV - " November 1, 2000 wwftk.'. 2 2000 Thomas F. Nixon, Esquire VIA_TELECOPIER AND MAIL Woodruff, Spradlin 6 Smart 714-835-7787 701 South Parker Street, Suite 8300 Orange, California 92868-4760I Re: Dairy Wash Watdr>CordeTeeh� .. .. This acknowledges receipt of your letter dated October 30, 2000 concerning this Agreement and the related Amendment. Under Section 2.E_ of the Amendment to the Dairy Wash Water Agreement SAWPA authorizes OCSD, by way of the Waste Discharge Permit, to act' On SAWPA's behalf to take any action to enforce the dairy discharge permit(s) pursuant to the April 1, 1991, Memorandum of understanding between SAWPA and OCSD. Section 2.H. of the amendment to the Dairy Wash Water Agreement specifically requires OCSD to perform the monitoring necessary each time a dairy discharges to SARI. It is not SAWPA's intention that the Dairy Wash Water Agreement and the related Amendment are modifications to the terms and conditions of the 1992 Memorandum of Understanding between SAWPA and OCSD except that the Dairy Wash Water Agreement and related Amendment provide for OCSD to undertake primary responsibility for the monitoring and permit enforcement. Very truly yours, 1Fl6 ANWYSCRID S CKI� . DLW:dVh cc: Eldon Horst, Executive Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority TOTRL P.e2 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, December 7, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, December 7, 2000, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (t) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair Greg Mathews,Asst. to the General Manager Guy Carro=o Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Brian Donahue Maintenance Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Gerald Sigler Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Jan Debay, Past Board Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Andrei loan, Project Manager Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Jim Mullins, Project Manager Lynn Daucher William Cassidy, Project Engineer Christina Shea Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the November 2, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. PDC Committee Minutes f Page 2 Y December 7,2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson reported that he attended the swearing in of newly-elected Assemblypersons Lynn Daucher and Tom Harmon in Sacramento. On his first day, Assemblyman Harmon introduced a bill on urban runoff. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reminded the committee members of the December 14 legislators luncheon. It will stress the need for bipartisan support of issues of importance to Orange County and serve as a beginning for dialogues for the future. Mr. Anderson also announced that the multiple-party,lawsuit challenging Kem County's biosolids ordinance on CEQA requirements was unsuccessful on every point. The three general managers of the agencies (LA City, LA County Sanitation Districts and Orange County Sanitation District)will be meeting with general counsel on the next course of action. A biosolids ordinance is also under consideration by Kings County Board of Supervisors. It now appears that Class B biosolids will sunset in two years and three years after that Class A biosolids will have to be exceptional quality and composted,which is a change from what was originally proposed by staff. Staff is looking at ways to convert our biosolids to 'exceptional' quality. Mike Moore and Layne Baroldi are working on a strategic plan for biosolids that will address this issue. The preliminary findings of the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan were discussed. A final recommendation will be presented to the committees and the Board in February. The EMT spent 2-112 days discussing the draft. While the numbers are still being analyzed by Mr. Anderson, he stated that at the moment the"roll-up" of the staffing needs is 4%, or 20 FTE regular staff and 35 to 40 limited term staff for our design and construction management program. The impact of the CIP program on staffing was discussed. Staff is continuing to refine the plan based on the 66 business units that have been identified, along with the tasks and available resources. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering was not present. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS John Linder,Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. There were threes changes orders this month for consideration by the PDC Committee. PDC Committee Minutes J Page 3 December 7, 2000 (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Engineering Manager Doug Stewart reported that there was one professional services agreement and one addendum approved by the General Manager between October 19 and November 22, 2000. (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Engineering Manager Doug Stewart reported that there was one addendum approved in the past month to evaluate the watershed dairy flow impacts. Director Debay suggested that the media be contacted about our efforts in this area. (12) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION PROJECT STATUS REPORT Project Manager Andrei loan reported that proposals have been solicited from five firms for value engineering services. The proposals are due on December 18 and the PSA will be presented to the PDC Committee in February. Lindell Marsh and Carl Nelson have been retained to prepare an action plan for possible federal and state funding for the project. The preliminary project report is due December 15. A workshop on December 18 will help define a new cost estimate. The final project report is due the end of December and it will be provided to all involved agencies. The intent all along has been to complete the design and issue a notice to proceed for construction to begin next fall. This has not changed. Blake Anderson reported on a meeting that was held last week with Joe Grindstaff and Wayne Holcomb,SAWPA general manager and Board president respectively. Mr. Eckenrode and Mr. Anderson represented the District and Andrei loan provided technical support. A memo was handed to Mr.Anderson by Mr. Grindstaff that discussed the original design and construction of the SARI line and the decision that the District made to put it in the river. SAW PA believes that any costs involved with the relocation should be borne by the District. They offered to work with the District to secure state and federal funding. Staff noted that they in no way agree with SAW PA's position and will be meeting with the SAW PA Board in January. Staff will continue to finalize design, obtain permits and prepare for construction next year with a completion of the work in three years. Director Debay mentioned that SCAG has a resolution dispute process that the District may want to consider to try to resolve the problems with SAW PA. General Counsel will be review the costs of the project to both the District and SAW PA before going ahead. (13) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg, Project Manager, reported on the December 2 workshop. The estimated costs and an alternative project proposal were discussed. There will be one more meeting of the Joint Coordinating Committee on December 18 before the projecfs go/no go vote at the January 24,2001 meeting. Staffing and the approach to project delivery will be discussed. There is the possibility of one additional committee meeting to discuss how OCW D plans to finance their portion of the project costs. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 December 7, 2000 Director Anderson suggested that staff contact the light rail system advocates about the possibility of including the reclaimed water line into their project. (14) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-m) a. PDC00-80 Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K. L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39,with Margate Construction,authorizing an addition of$52,782, increasing the total contract amount to$10,328,051. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the change order. b. PDC00-81 Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1,with Southern Contracting Company,authorizing an addition of$10,439,increasing the total contract amount to$1,527,673. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. PDC00-82 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 2 to Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-2, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20,with Ken Thompson, Inc.,authorizing an addition of$145,000, increasing the total contract amount to$6,486,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. PDC00-83 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for additional construction support services for the Solids Storage and Trunk Loading Facility at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-60,for an additional amount of$306,359, Increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to$1,221,885. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Green left the meeting at 6:25 p.m. and did not return. e. PDC00-84 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for additional engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41,for an additional amount of$474,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,807,047, and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate the acquisition of 69 easements to approve individual PDC Committee Minutes v Page 5 December 7, 2000 payments for each easement,for a total amount not to exceed $69,000,and to accept Grants of Easement from 69 property owners in connection with the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41. Staff was asked to consider including weed abatement services with the easement offers. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. f. PDCOO-85R Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$2,116,000 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No. J-33-1, for a total project budget of$19,486,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1A, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authodze Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. Staff was directed to include reasons for replacement and salvage value of equipment in the agenda report to the Board. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors as revised. g. PDCOO-86R Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$370.058 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total project budget of$19,856,058; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of $370,058, Increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $2,720,993. Staff was directed to provide the committee with a clarification of the differences between office and field mark-ups at the February PDC Committee meeting. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors as revised. h. PDCOO-87 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$19,300 for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1,Job No. SP19950063, for a total project budget of $271,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, on PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 December 7, 2000 file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3)Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;and (4)Award a construction contract to Ark Construction Company for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1,Job No. SP19950063, for an amount not to exceed $177,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. I. PDCOO-88 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Establish a budget of $623,200 for Plant No. 2 Headworks Pilot Testing Program,Job No. P2.66-1; and (2)Authorize the Purchasing Manager to enter Into a Sole Source contract with Infilco Degremont Inc., for the purchase and installation of two bar screen racks, rakes, and appurtenances, per Specification No. M064,for an amount not to exceed $240,150. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. j. PDCOO-89 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76,for an amount not to exceed $2,350,209. Staff was directed to include additional discussion in the agenda report to the Board on why the work is necessary to support the construction of new clarifiers rather than rehabbing the existing ones. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. k. POCOO-90 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Establish a budget of $244,300 for a needs assessment(Phase 1)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No.J-84; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services to complete a needs assessment (Phase 1)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84,for an amount not to exceed $156,800. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. 1. PDC00-91 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.,for additional services for On-Call Computer Modeling Services for an additional amount of$100,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $225,000. PDC Committee Minutes r Page 7 December 7, 2000 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. M. POCOO-92 Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Computer Facility Integration, L.L.C.for Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System,Job No.J-25-1, providing additional hardware and software consulting services in the amount of $35,000,for a total amount not to exceed $2,848,384. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Staff was directed to provide the committee with a clarification at the February PDC Committee meeting of the differences between office and field mark-ups quoted in the letter from SPEC Services for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 1, 2001 at 5 p.m. PDC Committee Minutes f Page 8 December 7, 2000 (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by: pJ Tappan D Committee Secretary %y Iab0en0a`DOLl]CCBW,nuteeV 00700 PM Mmulea.Eec PDC COMMITTEE Many as<e Tosa.urar. to , AGENDA REPORT Mm WMW Imm Mmbe Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER REPLACEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 11-17-3, AND HEIL AVENUE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 11-20 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 11-17-2, and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-20, with Ken Thompson, Inc. authorizing an addition of$145,000, increasing the total contract amount to $6,466,000. SUMMARY Change Order No. 2 includes one item of added work to Contract No. 11-17-3. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages are $1000 a day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date January 3, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date February 5, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date February 5, 2001 Projected Completion Date February 5, 2001 Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $6,325,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 16,000.00 This Change (Add) $ 145,000.00 Change Orders to Date $ 161,000.00 Percentage Increase to Date 2.54% Amended Contract Price $6,486,000.00 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted.(CIP: Section 8 — Pages 42 and 43) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The contingency fund for the project budgets will provide for the increased construction contract costs. Refer to the Budget Information Tables for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 11-17-3, Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement, includes the installation of 2,630 feet of 39-inch Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) and 1,845 feet of 33-inch VCP sewer pipe, manholes and appurtenant facilities in the City of Huntington Beach. Contract No. 11-20, Heil Avenue Interceptor, includes the installation of 4,970 feet of 30-inch VCP, manholes, and appurtenant facilities in the City of Huntington Beach. In addition, this contract includes two City of Huntington Beach cash contracts. Contract No. 1042, Goldenwest Storm Drain Improvements, and Contract No. 1103, Goldenwest Pavement Rehabilitation. AKM Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract and it was awarded to Ken Thompson, Inc. on October 27, 1999. The contract is 60% complete. The following summarizes the Change Order Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Modifications to profile at $ 145,000 0 Changed Wintersbur Channel Condition Total Change Order No. 2 $ 145,000 0 A portion of the Goldenwest Trunk Sewer Replacement Project was constructed in 1998 as part of the County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department's (PFRD) improvements to the Wintersburg Channel. The PFRD project constructed two manholes and 210 lineal feet of the new 39-inch Goldenwest sewer below the channel. Field investigations during construction of the current contract revealed that the section of sewer installed under the PFRD project was sloped in the wrong direction. We believe that the upstream manhole has settled due to poor underlying soil conditions. This change order is to correct the adverse slope. Page 2 y" ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Both projects were included in the 1989 Master Plan EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table— Contract No. 11-17-3 Budget Information Table— Contract No. 11-20 Change Order Status Report Change Order No. 2 BP:ldc WadonWata11Wp.dtelengWBS&CONTRACTS -17-3 AR 1200.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-17-3 1 THY ,�L N:9 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED k� u PROJBCt1TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDIT-L& r`r BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DA ue v Project Development $5,000 $5,275 $ 5,275 $5,275 $ 5,275 $5,275 100% Studies/Permitting $4,054 1 S 4,054 1 $4,054 1 $ 4,054 1 $4,054 100% Consultant PSA $85,000 $83,000 $ 83,000 $83,000 $ 83,000 $79.882 96% Design S1e8 $100,000 $105,000 $105,000 $105.000 $105,000 $86,102 82% Construction Contract $2.000.000 $3,557,000 $145.000 $ 3.702,000 $3,557.000 $146,000 $ 3.702.000 $2,941,545 79% Construction Administration $300.000 $167,OD0 $ 167,000 $167,000 $ 167,000 $52.007 31% Construction Inspection $274,000 $ 274,000 $274,000 $ 274,000 $243,987 89% Contingency $240,000 $310,671 ($145,000) $ 0% Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 2,730.000 $ 4,506,000 $ - $ 4,508,000 $ 4,195.329 $ 145,000 $ 4,340,329 It 3,412,852 79% 11-17.8 budget ihTo tbI.0O2 Page 1 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE HEIL AVENUE INTERCEPTOR CONTRACT NO. 11-20 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $3,000 $ 3,000 $3,000 $ 3,000 $105 4% Studies/Permitting $5,000 $ 5,000 $5,000 $ 5,000 $2,336 47% Consultant PSA $315.000 $114,870 $ 114,870 $114,870 $ 114,870 $108,345 94% Design Staff $150.000 $90,000 $90.000 $90,000 $90,000 $84,160 94% Construction Contract $2.000,000 $2.784,000 $ 2,784,000 $2,784,000 $ 2,784,000 $1,092,891 39% Construction Administration $685.000 $156,000 $ 156.000 $156,000 $ 156,000 $20,487 13% Construction Inspection $263,000 $ 263,000 $263,000 $ 263,000 $34 914 13% Contingency $295,130 $ 295,130 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 3,150,000 $ 3,711,000 $ - $ 3,711,000 $ 3.415,870 $ - $ 3,415,870 $ :1.343, 338 39% 11-20 Budget Table CO2 6 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT GOLDENWEST STREET TRUNK SEWER REPLACEMENT Contract No. 11-17-3/11-20 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 01/0312000 $6,325,000 $6,325,000 400 400 CONGA* 07/10/2000 $16,000 $6,341,000 0.25% 0 0 CO NO.2 I Pending 1 $145,0001 $6,486,000 1 2.54% 10 1400 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 H:\wp.dtawng\ENGQ.34.1tCO2chngstat.xls Y Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (21 Date: December 20 2000 Job: Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement and , Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-17-3. and Contract No. 11-20 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add) $145,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 11-17-3 ITEM 1 —MODIFICATIONS TO PROFILE AT WINTERSBURG CHANNEL This item is for labor, materials, and equipment required to correct an adverse slope to an existing 39- inch Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) trunk sewer under the Wintemburg Channel. Field investigation revealed that the profile of the 210 lineal feet of the 39-inch VCP has an adverse slope, and was not compatible with the Contract No. 11-17-3 design slope. To correct this problem District Staff directed KTI to implement the scope of work detailed in Plan Change No. 2 (revised profile) to Contract No. 11-17-3. dated August 2000. This item was negotiated with the Contractor for total cost impact only. An extension of time for this item is currently being evaluated, and therefore, the Contractor does not waive his rights to include a time extension under a subsequent change order, pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 145,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 145,000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ken Thompson Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement and : Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No, 11-17-3 and Contract No. 11-20 Consultant: AKM Consultina Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contact time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, and that no direct, Indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 3, 2000 Original Contract Time: 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 5, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 400 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 5, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA Actual Final Completion Date: NIA Original Contract Price $ 6,325 000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 16,000.00 This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 145,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 6.486.000.00 ! Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927288127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Goldenwest Street Trunk Sewer Replacement and Heil Avenue Interceptor, Contract No. 11-17-3. and Contract No. 11-20 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: December 20, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Ken Thompson, Inc. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Heedngom Tuad.aar. 12/07100 IZ120/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbs hem Number Porno-83 Ixdl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kathleen Millea, Engineer SUBJECT: SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for additional construction support services for the Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an additional amount of $306,359, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $1,221,885. SUMMARY Construction of Job No. P2-60, Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility, began in May 2000. Carollo Engineers is the design consultant for this project. While the original Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers included $188,000 for the estimated construction support services, it did not include enough money to complete the project. Some of the recommended additional funds are due to changes in the Scope of Work during the design phase. Rather than process a series of addenda to the Professional Services Agreement during the design of the project, Staff decided to wait until the project had been in construction several months to better evaluate the necessary funds required to complete the project. Currently, the project has been in construction for six months. At this time, Staff has evaluated the remaining efforts for Carollo to provide construction support services until the project completion. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers providing for additional construction support services, for an additional amount of$306,359, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $1,221,885. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. e.,..y A,-U F.,. W0Bamd A'.1d.aedoa,vowiem t>(d).dc a.„..d, � Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT " ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: FV 2000-01, Section 8, Page 86: Capital Improvement Program,Solids Handling and Digestion, Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility, Job No. P2-80.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The funds for the proposed Addendum will be transferred from the budget contingency. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1) Budget Information Table 2) PSA Status Report 3) Fee Proposal for Addendum No. 3 KTM: %wftaWaWlaftgafta"Oa Draft Rep OCW240nn12a0mm R.....e MMS Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-60 Eli P ORIGINAL'. CURRENT PROPOSED, PROPOSED FUNDS . THIS PROPOSED ESTIMXTED �` PROJECTr1FMK 'AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION `TOTAL EXPENDITIPRE 7 . BUDGET BUDGET: INCREASE, ` BUDGET TO DATE + REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE Project Development $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Studies/Permitting Is - $ 7,000 1 $ $ 7.0001 $ 7,000 $ - $ 7,000 1 $ 7,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 482,000 $ 915.526 $ 306,359 $ 1,221,885 $ 915,526 $ 306,359 $ 1,221.885 $ 857,000 70% Design Staff $ 290,000 $ 217,408 $ - $ 217,408 $ 217,408 $ - $ 217,408 $ 172,000 1 79% Construction Contract $ 3220.000 $ 11,000.000 $ - $ 11,000.000 $ 10,428,440 $ - $ 10,428,440 $ 1.410,000 14% Construction Administration $ 668,000 $ 1,074,066 $ - $ 1,074,066 $ 1,074,066 $ . $ 1,074,066 $ 240,000 22% Construction Inspection $ 330,000 $ 806.000 $ - $ 806,000 $ 806,000 $ - $ 806,000 $ 138,000 17% Contingency $ - $ 1100.000 $ 306,359 $ 793,641 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Reimbursable Costs $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 4,990,000 $ 15.120,000 $ - $ 15,120,000 $ 13,448.440 $ 306,359 $ 13,754,799 $ 2,824,000 21% N1wp.dtalengVabs and mMre %P2L ConstmMioMCemlb AddendumdAddendum No.L Budget Inlamsuon TeE Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. P2-60, Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Total Project Budget: $15, 120,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: February 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2/26/98 Original PSA No. 1, and Solids Storage and Truck Loading $795,101 $795,101 Facility at Plant No. 2 11/24/98 1' Cake Transfer Pumps Layout Evaluation for P2-60 $18,461 $818,562 Flat Bottom Storage Bin Design and Electrical 4/28/99 2 Improvements for P2-60, Discontinue Contract for $101,964 $915,526 P1-60 Pending 3 Construction Support Services for P2-60 $306,359 $1,221,885 Approved by OM per delegated authority by board Resolution 99-23 \4adonWatal\wp.dw%ngwoeS B CONTRACTStP26e\Constmction730\Carollo Addendums\Carollo Addendum No.3TSA Status Reptutdoo 11/21/00 ceroLLo e n G L n Be e r s ,rrP,e..,: p.n6,e•:,:,,;,,v, November 3, 2000 4584A.20 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Attention: Ms. Kathy Millea Subject: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-60 Professional Services Agreement Addendum No. 3 Dear Ms. Millea: In accordance with our discussions on October 26,2000, and subsequent discussions on November 3,2000, Carollo has revised the proposed construction services labor hours to be included in Addendum No. 3 to our professional services agreement dated February 25, 1998. The revisions are presented on Exhibit 1 attached. We appreciate the Districts' consideration of our proposal, and appreciate your efforts in coordinating the negotiations for this Addendum. We look forward to continuing our construction support through completion of the project. Please call us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, oAllen LLO , P.C. C. , P.E. Principal ACT:kpr Enclosures: W MMe0_SAONMs81A204VV,90ea001.ax 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 • FAX (714) 540-4349 t Exhibit 1 Orange County Sanitation Distrct Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facilities at Plant No.2 Job No. 122.60 Construction Services Labor Added Labor Construction Hours Through Hours Addendum ServicesTotal Task No. Description Addendum No.2 No. 3 Hours 1 Progress Meetings 84 489 573 2 Review Submittals 763 467 7230 3 Review and Respond to RFIs 149 377 526 4 Review C.O.s, Plan Changes ill 379 490 Sa 11orepare Conformed Drawings 01 110 110 R8 5b Pre are contract Record Drawings 164 449 613 6 Prepare O&M Manuals 420 256 676 7 Project Man ement 0 68 68 Operator Training 0 100 100 TOTAL 1691 2695 4386 Labor Rate $99.73 $101.49 $100.80 Labor Cost $168,647 $273,516 $442,163 Percent Profit 10.16% 9.30% 9.63% Profit $17,139 $25,437 $42,576 Labor plus Profit $185 $29953 $484,739 $3,148 $7%6 $10,554 C on Services Total 1 $158,9341 $306,359 $495,293 Total Contract Amount I nru Add.2 1 1 $915,526 Addendum No. 3 Amount $306 359 Revised Contract Amount $1,221,885 H:\CllenhOCSO SAOw\45a4A.20\LIMDD3Em bil1 ` PDC COMMITTEE Meebngl) ro To BC.dD, 17/7/1BBB 12/10/00 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Ran Number PDMO-84 1W.1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for additional engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an additional amount of$474,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,807,047, and (2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate the acquisition of 69 easements, to approve individual payments for each easement for a total amount not to exceed $69,000, and to accept Grants of Easement from 69 property owners, in connection with the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41. SUMMARY The Scope of Work in this Addendum adds three more tasks to the original Scope of Work included in the Professional Services Agreement(PSA). The three tasks consist of assisting the District to acquire 69 easements, supplementary geotechnical work, and reviewing a relocation alternative presented by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA). On August 23, 200D, the Board awarded a PSA to Brown and Caldwell to prepare the construction documents for the Relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI). The design work is proceeding according to the project schedule. During the right-of-way mapping effort, it became apparent that the proposed alignment for the new SARI line crosses through the back of 69 residential lots. During a field visit, Staff noticed that the back portions of these lots are separated from the actual house pads by slopes and fences or block walls. Other entities, such as the Orange County Flood Control District and Sprint, already have easements crossing the properties in question. The Orange County Sanitation District (District) needs to acquire temporary and permanent easements through the 69 properties. The temporary easements are necessary during construction only. The permanent easements are required for access to manholes and pipeline maintenance. The easement acquisition effort will require negotiation on an individual basis with 69 property owners. Negotiations may be completed at different points over a period of two or three months. Therefore, Staff recommends that the authority be granted to Re...e, v Page 1 the General Manager to include negotiate, accept, and approve individual payments for each easement for a total amount not to exceed $69,000. Preliminary geotechnical work was performed during the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) realignment study. The Scope of Work for the final design included some additional subsurface investigation to determine design constraints for the pipeline. The geotechnical subconsultanl determined that the extent of alluvial deposits is greater than anticipated. To minimize the change orders during construction, Staff determined that additional borings are necessary to establish the type of soils more accurately. Auger borings will be included in the additional geotechnical Scope of Work to determine the presence and size of boulders. The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) submitted an alternative realignment option for the SARI line. Staff recognizes the importance of evaluating this option in detail and requires that Brown and Caldwell prepare a comprehensive review of SAWPA's alternative alignment. These three items of work are in addition to the original Scope of Work included in the Professional Services Agreement(PSA). Therefore, Staff recommends the approval of Addendum No. 1 to Brown and Caldwell for an additional amount of $474,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,807,047. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241, is $49,787,000. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. The total funds authorized to date, including amounts allocated to the Professional Services Agreements (PSA)with Consultants other than Brown and Caldwell, are summarized below: Firm PSA, Including Addenda Brown and Caldwell $3,332,829 Holmes & Narver $ 465,089 Glenn Lukos &Associates $ 39,845 Carl Nelson $ 37,200 K.S. Dunbar $ 166,000 TOTAL $4,040,963 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Section 8, Page 21, FY2000101) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) a. . �8 Page 2 a 1 The funding for this Addendum will be provided from the project contingency budget. The total amount included in this authorization request consists of$474,218 for additional engineering fees and $69,000 for easement acquisition, for a total amount not to exceed $543,218. According to the 1972 WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY agreement, SAWPA has the obligation to reimburse the District for 76% of the engineering fees and easement acquisition cost included in this Addendum. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report was certified on July 19, 2000 and a Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Brown and Caldwell Fee Proposal for Addendum No. 1 Akjak \kobalMalalNWlobaMgenda Oren Repor[STD02d1 AR 120700.dw eaaae Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Dwelo menl S 17,000 S 17,000 $ 17,000 - S 17,000 S - $ 17,000 S 7.896 46% Studies/Permitun S 1.122000 S 1,122,000 S 1122000 $ - $ 1122.000 $ 454503 41% ConsuRant PSA $ 875.000 $ 4,040.963 E 474218 S 4,515,181 S 4.040963 $ 474218 S 4515181 S 762.841 17% Desi nStaf $ 366200 $ 831000 $ 831,000 1 S 831000 $ - $ 831000 $ 253,072 30% Construction Contract S 21,203400 S 33.000000 $ 33,000.000 S - S - S 0% ConsWctioo Administration $ 1.262,300 $ 1876000 $ 1876.000 S - $ - $ 0% Construction Ins n $ 1718000 E 2.555.000 $ 2555,000 S - $ - S 0% Confinaency $ 5 088 400 $ 6,345,037 $ (543,218) S 5.801 819 S - $ - $ 0% Easement acquisition $ 69.000 S 69.000 - $ 69,000 S 69,000 S 0% Reimbursable Costs TOTAL S 30,530,300 $ 49,787.000 $ - $ 49.787000 $ 6.010,963 $ 543,218 S 6.554,181 E 1.478.312 23% H:My wr8y4Ab4a0.40mIbIP�V&1bh SMI RE,aLIGNMENTWC GESIGNK44andum Ne I g241 MC M41-Bu4BeI Table xoIDisbich Form R.el e4".31.2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 Total Project Budget: $49,787,000 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: September 4, 2000 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 8/23/00 Original PSA Design Relocation and Protection, and $3,332,829 $3,332,829 Abandonment of The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41 Pending Addendum No.1 Provide additional engineering services $474,218 $3,807,047 including subsurface investigation, preparing a comprehensive report on the alignment submitted by SAWPA, preparing all documents necessary to acquire 69 easements. N:Wp.dtMengUOBS S CONTRACTS1241 SARI REALIGNMENT\_Budget into tables-wplea1241 PSA Statue Repont.BSC Add 1Am Al:jo:jak I J13b V n Karmen,Wile IM Irvine,CA 92606 Tel:(949)6W.1070 rtx.(949)474-0940 November 14, 2000 Fnvxonmmrai Engmeamg&C.09 Mr. David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 0012119439-094 Subject: Proposal for Additional Right-of-Way Acquisition, Alignment Analysis, and Geotechnical Services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Project (Contract No. 241) Dear Mr. Ludwin: This letter is our fee proposal for additional right-of-way acquisition, alignment analysis, and geotechnical engineering services for the SARI Relocation and Protection project. The proposed services fall into three new tasks which would be added to our original scope of work. Full texts of the proposed scopes of work for these tasks are attached, but they are briefly described as follows: • Task 10 — Additional Right-of-Way Services. During the course of right-of-way investigations for the project, it has been discovered that certain areas believed to be public rights-of-way are in fact owned by private owners. A total of 69 parcels are involved, and therefore 69 private easements will need to be acquired. This proposal includes obtaining title reports for these parcels, preparing plat maps and legal descriptions, preparing deed documents, and conducting a certain amount of negotiation with property owners in an attempt to obtain voluntary acquisitions. • Task 11 — Analysis of Alignment E. During the course of the project, a new alignment alternative for the proposed pipeline was proposed by a consultant hired by SAWPA. This alternative alignment has become know as "Alternative E" or the "Webb Alignment". This proposal includes an investigation and analysis of that alignment by Brown and Caldwell, including a review of existing information related to the cost, constructability, environmental, and flood safety implications of Alignment E. • Task 12 — Additional Geotechnical Services. During the course of the project, several circumstances have arisen which result in the need to make added geotechnical investigations. The first of these circumstances is that initial borings made under our original contract have encountered different conditions than those reported in the preliminary geotechnical study. Since the geotechnical conditions are a critical element to saprajw..m, .Nddendum i�ubnu0al\leucr ver2.dac Mr. David Ludwin,Director of Engineering November 14, 2000 Page 2 t producing an adequate design and bid package for the proposed construction, additional borings are required to resolve the discrepancy and to produce a better assessment of the subsurface conditions. A second circumstance requiring additional borings is that the final alignment design chosen for the pipeline deviates somewhat from the proposed preliminary alignment, and therefore new borings are needed in areas which have not heretofore been explored. A third circumstance requiring added investigation is the need to better assess the presence of groundwater along the proposed alignment. This is a necessity to prepare more accurate descriptions for the contractor of likely dewatering volumes, and involves the test-pumping of certain of the geotechnical borings and analysis of the results in an attempt to ascertain this data. Finally, testing of various water quality factors of the pumped water is proposed, in order to facilitate the likelihood of the contractor obtaining an easy (and therefore cheap) authorization to dispose of dewatering water directly into the floodway. Our proposed fee for these additional tasks is $457,213. Tables supporting this fee and providing detailed breakdowns of various fee items are attached. A summary of the total fee for the three added tasks of this proposal is shown in the table below: Original Contract This Proposal New Total Burdened Labor $891,495 $39,448 $930,943 Overhead ® 120% $1,069,794 $47,338 $1,117,132 Fixed Profit ® 6.20% $121,600 $5,381 $126,981 Subtotal - Consulting Services $2,082,889 $92,167 $2,175,056 including burdened labor, overhead and profit, not to exceed Other Direct Costs and $1,049,940 $382,051 $1,431,991 Subconsultan Miscellaneots us Engineering $200.000 $0 $200,000 TOTAL AMOUNTS 1 $3,332,829 1 $474,218 1 $3.807,047 This proposal is predicated upon the following assumptions: • Work will be performed in accordance with the attached scopes of work. • OCSD will obtain and provide to Brown and Caldwell the original input file data for the HEC-6 computer runs whose output is given in the scour analysis report by Holmes and Narver dated November 1996. • Acquisition assistance will be limited to 69 parcels. For each parcel from which an easement acquisition is required,the required plat map will be based upon record tract map and title report data. Encumbrances identified in the title report will be shown on the plat. Field property surveys are not included in this proposal. s\project managcmen0addcndum NubautuNeiter ver2.doe Mr.David Ludwin,Director of Engineering November 14,2000 Page 3 • For each parcel from which an easement acquisition is required, no more than seven hours total will be spent in the preparation of the deed document and in property acquisition negotiations. If voluntary acquisition by the property owner is not agreed to after this level of effort, the matter will be turned over to OCSD for acquisition by condemnation proceedings. This proposal includes up to 80 hours of professional effort to provide support activities during condemnation proceedings. • It is assumed that property acquisitions will involve only the underlying property owners, and the permissions required of any other overlapping easement holders, if any, will be obtained by means of pets its and/or plan approvals by those holders, and that deed acquisitions from those holders are not required. Schedule. For Task 10 (Right-of-Way Acquisition), the work per this proposal will be complete within five months of Notice to Proceed. (Either easements will have been acquired by voluntary means by then, or the non-acquired properties will be turned over to OCSD for acquisition by condemnation.) For Task 11 (Alternative E Alignment Analysis), work will be complete within 30 days of Notice to Proceed. For Task 12 (Additional Geotechnical Services), work will be complete within three months of Notice to Proceed. If you wish to further discuss either the scope of work or the fee proposal, we will be available at your convenience. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Very truly yours, Vnwar ALDWELL ry Principal In Charge Opro}.a,m ememWdendum J�unm ttaNam,Yer2.da ' SCOPE OF WORK SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2.41 SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 10 Task 10 - Provide ROW Acquisition Documents and Services for 69 Additional Parcels 10.1 Additional Right-of-Way Acquisition Documentation It has been determined that the proposed sewer will require additional permanent right- of-way and temporary right-of way from 69 private parcels. Consultant shall obtain title reports for the additional affected parcels and shall determine the additional easements necessary on a temporary and permanent basis. The right-of-way required will be for easements (not land owned in fee). Temporary easements will be used during construction and permanent easements are required for access and maintenance of manholes and pipeline. For 41 of the parcels the permanent easement will also be sufficient for construction purposes, but for the other 28 parcels separate easements for permanent and temporary purposes will be required. For each easement required, Consultant shall prepare a metes and bounds legal description and a plat based on the recorded tract map for the parcel. Field surveys of properties will not be conducted. 10.2 Additional Right-of-Way Acquisition Appraisals Consultant shall provide appraisals for easement acquisition for these 69 parcels. A professional, licensed real estate appraiser shall prepare appraisals. 10.3 Additional Right-of-Way Property Acquisition Services Consultant shall prepare a grant deed ready for signature for easement acquisition from the underlying private property owner of each of the 69 parcels. Consultant shall approach each property owner involved in the process and shall negotiate on District's behalf the terms of the acquisition. A maximum effort of seven hours per parcel is included in this subtask. OCSD will pay acquisition fees for all easements, will pay any legal fees for right-of-way acquisition, will process the document recordation, and will bear all costs and expenses associated with non-voluntary acquisitions. ' SCOPE OF WORK SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO.2•41 SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 11 Task 11 - Review of Proposed"Alternate E" ("Webb Alignment") Alignment GENERAL The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority's consultant Webb and Associates has prepared two letter reports dated August I&and August 22°d, 2000. This report further evaluates the Holmes and Narver Reports and introduces and recommends Alternative E which combines the key components of Alternative BI and D. Sub Task 11.1-Review of WEBB Report. The Consultant will perform a review of the WEBB report and present findings and recommendations to the District in a letter report. A preliminary review has indicated that the new alignment of Alternative can be analyzed in four distinct reaches. Reach 1: From existing SARI stations 976 to 1042 (Alternate D stations 976 to 1060). Alternate E alignment proposes to leave the existing line in place. At station 1042 a river crossing will be installed.This will require protection by a new grade stabilization structure, which is the same as the Grade Stabilization structure No.1 proposed for Alternate A.This reach of Alternate E is the same as Alternate A. Reach 2: From Alternate D station 1060(existing station 1042)to Alternate D station 1080. This reach along the bicycle path next to La Palma Avenue is the same as Alternate D. Reach 3: From Alternate D station 1180 to station 1205, along the BNSF railroad, Alternate E proposes to build the new pipe in the river adjacent to the railroad, adding major erosion protection and slightly narrowing the channel. (Under Alternate D,the pipe is tunneled on the far side of the railroad from the river.) Reach 4: Alternate E proposes to leave the existing pipe in place from Alternate D station 1205 to the end of the project. (The Alternate D alignment continues the tunnel and then continues construction outside the river to existing SARI line at station 1237.) The Consultant will review environmental consequences as per existing EIR, risk to existing portions of SARI pipeline to be left in service per Holmes and Narver scour analysis,costs of engineering and construction,and constructability factors (such as damage to existing facilities including railroad, golf course operations,etc.) Cost estimates in the Holmes and Narver report will be used for comparative cost analysis. ' SCOPE OF WORK SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO.241 SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 12 Task 12 — INTRODUCTION As the augmentation work under the original gco[echnical scope of work progressed,development of the data demonstrated that more information would be required to produce adequate construction contract documents. Additionally,recent investigation suggests the presence of cobbles and boulders near or within the proposed pipeline alignment. The locations of bedrock and cobblestboulders have a pronounced impact upon the construction cost of the project. OCSD is contemplating alignment changes in the vicinity of the easternmost and westernmost portions of the project to accommodate more effective construction means and methods.As the realignment at the easternmost portion includes lowered invert elevations,groundwater considerations become more critical as future inverts will be located up to 12 feet below the groundwater surface during the drier months.To support the decision-making process propose to characterize the pertinent ground in more detail by initiating further geotechnical investigations,including permeability tests,analyzing the information and incorporating the findings into our geotechnical design summary(GDR),geotechnical design memorandum (GDM)and geotechnical baseline report(GBR). The work described is currently beyond the existing scope of work.We therefor propose the following additions to the scope. This entire Scope of Work constitutes Task 12 of the Contract. The subtasks noted below refer to the subtasks and paragraph items in the scope of work for the original contract,which this Task 12 modifies and adds to as provided for herein. SCOPE OF WORK 1. Submsk 2.2 Geotechnical Investigation a. Item 2.2.3 Soil Borings 1) Drill 23 borings totaling 1250 feet. These will include 515 feet of soil sampling at intervals of 5 feet,240 feet of continuous soil sampling,275 feet of continuous rock coring and 200 feet of bucket auguring. See attached for a summary of the proposed drilling and sampling program. 2) Perform field geologic mapping. 3) Perform I permeability test of the ground in the vicinity of Horseshoe Bend(approximately station 1025+00)which will include 1 production well and 2 observation wells per test.To preclude the necessity of securing an NPDES permit,effluent from the rests will be discharged into the existing SARI sanitary sewer owned by OCSD at the manhole where the existing I8-inch connection from Yorba Linda enters the SARI(approximate Holmes and Narver station 1060+80,200 feet out into the riverbed). District personnel will open the existing manhole for use by Haley and Aldrich. All piping in the river must be installed by hand only(no machine construction will be allowed in the riverbed),and no vegetation may be disturbed during this process. Included for the permeability testing: a) Preparation of specifications for drilling and construction of test dewatering wells and ' observation wells,as well as,specifications for test pumping.Review bids and select contractor. b) Drill,construct,and develop dewatering well and 2 observation wells per test,including construction supervision. C) Conduct 1 pumping test.The anticipated duration of the tests would be 8 to 12 hours of pumping,and a roughly equivalent recovery interval. Subject to the conditions noted above,produced water will be discharged directly to the sanitary sewer without any treatment. In order to preclude the possibility of any storm flows entering the sanitary sewer, the test pumping operation must be completed within 48 hours and must be coordinated with District staff to occur during a period of time when there is no chance of rainfall or of high flows occurring in the river. d) Analyze pumping test results. A test pumping report would be produced. The results of the testing would be used by the construction contractor to design the final dewatering system. 2. Item 22.4 Soil Boring Sampling and Laboratory Testing.Conduct: a. 191 moisture content and dry density tests; b. 96 gradation analysis or Atierberg limits tests; C. Up to 30 unconfined compression tests;and d. 2 cor msivty tests. 3. Item 2.2.5 Boring Logs and Locations-Prepare boring logs and a plot plan of the boring locations. 4. Item 2.2.6 Report Parameters—Summarize the findings in a geologic interpretive report including a geologic profile,soil and rock including isolated boulders and cobbles,and groundwater levels. Include the review of the County As-Graded Report for the Whittier Fault. 5. Perform geological and geotechnical engineering analysis of the findings of the additional investigation and incorporate the results of the findings and the analysis in conjunction with previously derived information in accordance with the original tasks as: a. 2.2.7 Excavation Impacts; b. 2.2.8 Report Items; C. 2.2.9 Geotechnical Baseline Report; d. 2.2.10 Report Recommendations Specifications; e. 2.211 Report Recommendations Design;and f. 2.2.12 Delivery of Geotechnical Report. 6. Subtask 2.6 Permitting a. Secure NPDES permits for permeability testing,if OCSD will not allow discharge into their sanitary sewer system,and county encroachment permits for borings. b. We recommend that we be authorized to produce a geotechnical memorandum to support the environmental pemtits for the construction phase,i.e.,the NPDES for construction phase dewatering. r 7. New Subtask Environmental Water Quality Testing a. Haley&Aldrich has reviewed locations of the proposed new borings and existing monitoring wells along the SARI alignment to select locations for collection of representative groundwater samples. In addition,we have discussed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region the parameters they will most likely require,or question,for issuance of the concoction dewatering NPDES permit.The RWQCB has indicated they are most likely to be concerned with Total Suspended Solids(TSS)with a probable"Not to Exceed"concentration of 75 parts per million(ppm),but suggested that testing for several other parameters be performed. We propose to test collected samples for parameters likely to be required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region for issuance of construction dewatering NPDES. Furthermore,Haley&Aldrich also recommend testing selectively some samples for hazardous chemicals to screen the groundwater and evaluate potential health hazardous prior to construction. We have selected a total of 16 locations spread out along the proposed alignment for collection of water samples that should provide data that is fairly representative of overall groundwater conditions along the alignment. Samples of groundwater will attempt to be collected from eight new borings and from eight existing monitoring wells. b. All samples are to be tested for Total Suspended Solids and selectively for Chlorinated Pesticides by EPA Method 8081,Organo-phosphoms Pesticides by EPA Method 8141.Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA 8260,Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TRPH)by EPA method 418.1,General Minerals,Sulfides and Colifomr Bacteria. General Minerals includes bicarbonate and carbonate alkalinity,calcium,chloride,copper,iron,magilesium,manganese,zinc,sodium, sulfate total dissolved solids(TDS),total hardness,surfactants(MBAS),specific conductance and pH. Water samples will be collected from seven locations near sewer lines for rating for of coliform bacteria. Attachment 3 summarizes proposed sampling locations and tests. The estimated cost includes collecting samples,lab testing and drill rig standby time. c. The boring that is proposed to evaluate soil conditions at approximately Station 1237+40,for the new tie-in location on the south-side of the BNSF Railroad tracks,will be converted into a monitoring well. (This is proposed because the other wells installed along the railroad tracks do not have water reported in them. These wells probably do not have water because they are most likely in non-water bearing bedrock and not the river bed alluvial aquifer. The new boring at Station 1237 will probably be into alluvium and groundwater) d. In addition to the above water quality testing,we will perform limited testing of up to one soil sample per boring for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPH-G)and BTEX&M by EPA 8015M/802I and for heavier hydrocarbons in the C8 to C40 range using a hydrocarbon fingerprint test. These tests will only be performed if soils samples are suspected based on color,odor or field vapor readings. A State-certified analytical laboratory will perform testing. e. Upon completion of the field investigation and sampling program H&A will prepare a letter report presenting the findings of the environmental screening tests of soil and groundwater samples. The report will present our conclusions and recommendations, if any,along with the laboratory test reports. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PLAN Tess I SamirIIna Zones De th Bodnar ID Death Station HAS Continuous HHD BA 5 10 15 2025 30 35 40 4550 55 60 65 70 75 80 Pur0osa HAC-1 40 980+00 25 15 0 x x c c c x x x Revised tie-in HAC-2 65 982+50 45 0 20 x x x x x x x x g q q q x Reinterpret and determine bedrock elevation HAC-3 70 986+00 35 0 35 x x x x x x x g q q q q q q New manhole,reinterpret HAC-4 80 991+50 25 0 55 x x x x x g q q q q q q q q q q Fill information gap,determine bedrock HAC-5 70 996+00 25 0 45 x x x x x g q q q q q q q q New manhole,reinterpret HAC-6 60 999+50 30 0 30 x x x z x x g q q q q q Reinterpret for realignment HAC-7 65 1002+50 40 0 25 x x x x x x x x g q q q q Reinterpret HAC-8 80 1006+50 40 0 40 x x x x x x x x for realignment HAC-9 65 1013+50 40 0 25 x x x x x x x g q q q x q q q Confirmation for realignment g q q q q x Confirmation for realignment,new ckmanhole elevation HAC-11 45 1018+00 25 20 0 x x x x c c c c x Confirmation and determine rmation bedrock elevation HAD-11 00 1022+00 25 15 0 x z x x c c c z New manhole,Confirmation HAD-12 40 1034+30 25 15 0 x x x x x c c c RII data gap(see HAB-2) HAD-13 30 1164+40 0 30 0 c c c 0 o c Evaluate fill and Gal between B-14&8-15 HAD-14 40 1173+25 15 25 0 c c c c c x x x FlII data gap,Confirmation HAD-15 45 1179+00 20 25 0 c c c c c x x x x Confirmation and determine bedrock elevation HAC-16 45 1188+85 20 25 0 x x x c c c c c x Confirmation and determine bedrock elevation HAC-17 65 1199+70 30 35 0 x x x x x x c c c c c c c Confirmation and determine bedrock elevation HAD-18 50 1205+00 60 0 0 x x x x x x x x x x Confirmation and determine bedrock elevation HAG-19 35 1237+37 0 35 0 c c c c c c c Evaluate:new jacking pit,cross under BNSF HAC-20 80 986 Determine boulder/cobble risk(based on HAC-21 40 1045+00 40 Determine boulder/cobble risk(based on HAC-22 40 1048+00 40 Determine boulder/cobble risk(basetl on HAD-23 40 1064+00 4 Determine boulder/cobble risk based on Ot s 1230 515 240 275 Key. HSA-Hollow Stem Auger - Continuous=Continuous Soil Sampling HG=Continuous Rock Coring BA=Bucket Augur x=sampling 0 5-intervals c=continuous soil sampling q=continuous rock coring ATTACHMENT 1 Proposal:Additional Geotechnkal Investigation Page 1 of IPages SARI ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SAMPLING FOR NPOES PERMITTING &CONSTRUCTION Hole No. Station TSS Chlorinated Chlorinated Carbonate VOCs TRPH General SUIfWas Totat Total Coliform Soft TPH• Pesticides Pesticides Pesticides 8260 418.1 Minerals Nitrogen Inorganic Bacteria(by GIBTEX&M by 0081 by 8141 by8141 w/MTBE Nitrogen OCSD) &CS to C40 CB-35MW 976+80 X X New 1 980+00 New2 982+50 New 999+50 New 8 1008+50 New 9 1013+50 CB-42MW 1015+50 X X X X X HAB-2 1034+30 X X X HAB-4MW 1050+00 X X X X HAB-9MW 1086+00 X X X X X CB-7MW 1128+80 X X X X X % - CB-14MW 1161+35 X X X X NEW 14 1173+25 Fast of CB-18MW 1176+00 X X X X X X CB-24MW /196+50 X X X X X New 19 1237+37 X X X X X X X Total Teals Is" lea 46ea 4as e S 12 a 8ea gee Sea lea 7 $135a $e $ Unit Casts $12 $10 ea 195 $16 $1B0 $180 $0 $100 esl COaie T 192 $735 $860 3820 $2,025 405 $2,340 $128 $1,620 $1,620 $0 $700 Total Coat 1 ,215 ATTACHMENT 3 Environmental Tests to be Performed on Water Samples Page 1 of t Pages Breakdown of Cost By Task TASK Brown and Boyle Haley and Rick First Totals Caldwell Aldrich Engineers Metro Appraisal 10 $49 243 $62 30 $97 900 $209 73 11 $21384 $6 500 $27 884 12 $21 40 $215 421 $236%1 Total $92167 $6 500 $215 421 $62 230 $97 900 $474 218 Cost Details Brown and Caldwell Burdened Labor $39,448 Overhead at 120% $47,338 Fixed Profit at 6.20% $ 5.381 Subtotal—Consulting Services including Burdened labor,overhead and profit, not to exceed $92,167 Other Direct Charges S 0 TOTAL $92,167 Haley and Aldrich Burdened Labor $39,136 Overhead at 120% $46,963 Fixed Profit at 9.72% $ 8,369 Subtotal—Consulting Services including Burdened labor,overhead and profit, not to exceed $94,468 Other Direct Charges and Subconsultants $120,953 TOTAL $215,421 Boyle Engineering Subconsultant fees at hourly rates, Per schedule,not to exceed -$6,500 Rick Engineering Subix,multant fees at hourly rates, Per schedule,not to exceed $62,230 First Metro Appraisals Subconsultant fees at hourly rates, Per schedule,not to exceed $97.900 TOTAL FEE FOR THIS PROPOSAL $474,218 BROWN AND CALDWELL SANTA AM RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO.241 TASK AND DESCRIPTION pl0 Project Project Senior projapt Stag Prof prof Coat TeGI Tech Cost tar Haura Cler Coat Total Total Coat Dlr Mngr Engr Engr Engr Hours Hours Hours $7s ses ass saa ado sao sso sr, Task 10 Additional ROW Subtask 10.1 ROW Acquisitor,Oocumenls 1 2 18 4B 8] $3369 8 $136 ]5 53525 Subtask 10.2 ROW Acqulcllian Appraisals 2 16 40 88 $3.314 8 $138 74 $3650 Subtask ID.3 ROW Aoquisikon Services 1 2 1 16 1 40 59 $3 005 8 $138 87 3161 Condemnation Sippod 80 SO $5,200 S $136 188 $5.336 Task Subrofal 2 B M I36 192 59708 11 24 40 1 216 f5452 Task 11 WEBB Report Anelyah Subtask Alternate E Review 2 8 56 56 122 $6 438 16 $272 138 $6 710 Task Subtotal 2 6 56 56 122 E 6,638 18 2M 138 6710 Task 12 Additional Oeotechnleal Invectigatlons Subtask Additional Geotech.Invesll aeons 1 4 56 64 125 $6487 18 U72 141 $6759 Tesk Subtotal f 4 66 BO f251 $8487 I it 11 16 I 2]2 747 5199 TOTAL HOURS 5 18 ISO 256 439 22,633 56 952 40 26.921 TOTAL BURDENED LABOR COST (EQUALS 1.364x DIRECT COST) $39,448 t v14/W 1 a 1 DETA=ESTIMATE M R GE ECWUI EMGIMEERIMG SERVICES PUWNMLH9OUM 9DCa TOIMIS Persannd Per,,,eeeuw J w/120 —nutted a 9.rzM Seem os f 81 o SMe^ 5 SS C g C $ g g Bem sloo 91348 un nEn 99s S a 559 8 i rIEM DB FO 11ON 2.2.3 SW Ealnp lay out boles/D18 Alen 4 40 B4.737 894 ".ell Bannp:Hollow Stem Auger 3 34 LY 818 513 e 3 .988 28 BOR9 I81 No "IS .II111 BennBS Reek Core 3 28 v SOB 275 x 3 634rl W4 &N4 IIIbe ON OlON soppoI MM,Conunuous Sempll�M 2 a4 LF 8% 2b x 3 SR.]]4 8300 8300 ".%1 855 am NIIIIg Borings:Bucket Auger 2 20 LP SM NO x 3 61.3N 8250 8290 a&517 847 BBSR YIIXU FYNtl Meppi" 2 24 x % 62.R)4 g5W SSW so WAZ Pormeabl111y Tole-Prel P 6 2 3 x 1 61.I. NO 1.173 patneablllry ToCoruWd 3 20 1 e 915.962 1 x 3 61.5]I SNO 6250 87N 74%I%I 851 BI,Yd91Ie111 pameabl➢ryttau-C .et Tu 63.128 1 Sx 3 69.137 S1W 6250 6B87 S4.IM NO 8497W.285 PeeueaWllry Tas4-BgWrlgWe IB eeL 6400 1 % x 3 OLM SON 82W ON? BH9 639 8131 63.5W CurrenM Boeing to iuen, 10 w 8500 1 x x 3 81.039 $125 $1" W87 SSW Sal $111 $2.B% a111cC u.,-complo Dry" 613W 4 3 BSm SON s%MS tlllc Can(N Nmpk Ino SON 8 3 me. 8234 82.W4 RRTntInky a Wye SLOSI 1 8831 11W 0 17 91016 MOMtoeing Wtl4 9]5 IN x x 1 8].5W 8].W3 crttlN re,wwk MI FMamrtJ 61,86, T14A ]. 9uMoml ror Item 229 1 IS 1 14 1 W,I 1 1 2 4 10 191 $7. 62M. 51.54a 99.. d® fi6W fiLR1111u1I R.21 aa11 Boeing SomPI1:Wb.�ng .up uux R --wow I2 MC/DD 1 FaN 815 I81 9 62W W... 84 8915 &A ]8 Cortoslrlry a gaN 81W 2 3 SOW 8320 Ba 82a a99 cM.um/nuerM1 PaM 840 98 3 8208 64sW 64W N.834 3 zl 2 8ee11 3 9209 54 U12 C 1uleuon 2 SeM 3 $206 64 N12 CBR/Swd8ulvM a BeN 3 8208 84 U12 Write,SMr 2eetl� 3 BROB 54 I1 U—fl..Compr R EBrA 855 90 3 S208 $1.815 84 InnMae; DY.Rmew 2 9aW 64 6212 OMlrig 1 8 a a Mee 81W 1 R I.3R8 sY30 $2] 922 91.59] C.,rw WOM No I.]3 189165.na ].tenet.,rarnen2 a1 S a 2 61.989 sa11 WA am W81 am 2.2.5 SO118onq SO lonlbru Nepue Repmt 6r Pem✓aGBa 0.1 R 6 1 1 W NO I20 9 81,W] 85,110 822 8311 W.140 Prcpm B.,lup 1 16 a0 4 IS 66.25] sn Os 88391 Re Bon Wntlm 1 a 1 a a eLe4x W] 919 Sublalel Mr lRm 1.26 0 4 16 W 9 11 89.198 9A 110 6184 BS1181 WI 1A.8 ReportPerameten Ceolagle Mlermeteuon 1 a 40 a 85.W1 BIW l0 35.191 Naalevl AxVrexb eirm Pamr I a I6 1 W.198 s44 ea 148 saMwl mr.e,.llem gas 2 e wI 16 e]s]9 aloe 915 ]4 AnAf11MBNT2 PlCpmal weeen Dte"S"H N Mgetg Pep 1 a2pgp DETAILED ESTAfATE FOR GEOTECHMI ENGINEERING SERVICES g PEPSONNELHOUM OO6 qq TOI'A141 I 6 H.." aa1C SIW SI.B .......... m SSf B51 ffem oESCflIP110N 2.2.7 Fs tlm 1 s I] z 32.20J SM RaJ 2.2.8 11, J J q9 2 8 %.9J9 9140 61.118 2.2.9 GeelcMlral 6aaellne fl I I2 6] 2 J -- - - s9.JS2 BI% W, 2R.10 el-PucmmeMsllona tlhalle 1 3 1] 0 2 Sim -6 Mm 2.2.11 He H 9e -W.lona Oe. 1 5 1] 0 R $2. Bb M= 2.2,12 De 4hnWR O 1 8 la 0 2 82.38] 8IS S2q]5 1&1 anmlltpi( NPOESAMeIa�ta-FlmuCmmpulallan 12 2 IB R IS SR% 1 1 $.16M 8200 BJi %.%1 NPDESACMMmue SamPle/ITM 2 a IS SILU5 1 ] 81.941 IAM $19 81110 IIIIII NPOE4AaMa1ma5u1TW 1 B % 81,000 I b %71 81.1% S19 3110 B2.201 NFDEB Aulamhment ttt lt-M 1 R 91 R LS 1 1 MIN BT/ %J Courtly Enoaa[hmaB Pttmll�Meeltt 8 IB Bi. 6I,= 1 2 SR.1% BRA% BH $Mw;19il IPItM UAH Court Pemlll� B. S I6 Fs. BI% IB 2 191 4.4 Baa 108 Si. SudoW fm nem 2G1 IJ J M W q Ia,B% 6200 Ba.a96812,a'ro 819J SI.MI&15.029 %4 Mmt*fle 9.&hWuk.0111mp MonNi Be w1c 6nM1edule,Hillm q 10 -SR JJ] 81% WM- 1 1 1 40 1 ao 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 88 M9 81% M.9 N.9 it 1 109 I 582 11131 9 I SS I I I I I f 87.9W M548 $2548 SJ.9M SBJ,JIJ WB IO.1 /IIIIY J UWI 839 136 SUM n U7.77I7 ows M.. W 8216A01 ATIXCM 2 P.,l.AERlimal GamrcnnlW tnve9ipalbn Py 2022 Rate Schedules Rate schedules for hourly rate subconsultants shall be as provided for in the original contract,except as added to below: Boyle Enaineerinz Principal Engineer $150/hour Rick Eneineerina Computing&Mapping Director $103/hour Principal Survey Analyst $96/hour Assistant Survey Analyst $78/hour Tide Report(Residential) $360 each Title Report(Commercial) $450 each First Metro Appraisals Appraisal of parcel 353-111-15 $2,000 Appraisals of Other Parcels $ 700 each Acquisition Labor $ 100/1hour Summary of Total Fee by Firm FIRM ORIGINAL THIS NEW CONTRACT PROPOSAL TOTAL Brown and Caldwell 2,196,037 92,167 2,288,204 Haley and Aldrich 207,994 215,421 423,415 Boyle Engineering 97,297 6,500 103,797 Rick Engineering 0 62,230 62,230 First Metro Appraisals 0 97,900 97,900 Other Firms (total) 631,501 0 631,501 Task 6.02 Miscellaneous 200,000 0 200,000 TOTAL AMOUNTS 3,332,829 1 474,218 1 3,807,047 PDC COMMITTEE MeetingDm To ad.orar. 22-7-00 12-20-00 AGENDA REPORT ItemNmbw RomNomber PDC00-OSR 33rn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Mullins, Engineer SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO TREATMENT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$2,116,000 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1,for a total project budget of$19,486,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-lA, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. SUMMARY This project upgrades or replaces many existing electrical equipment items at both treatment plants, which were determined to be deficient by prior electrical studies. One scope item, the Plant No. 2 Headworks Standby Power Facility, has already been constructed in order to meet Y2K readiness requirements. The Construction Contract for that facility was designated as J-33-1. The remaining portions of the original design, designated as J-33-1A, are now ready for construction bidding. Preliminary cost estimates prepared by the design engineer in earlier stages of design indicated a construction budget of$11,199,000. Subsequently, the design engineer's estimate has been finalized and now indicates a construction cost that is $2,504,000 higher than the budgeted amount. The construction cost increase is based on detailed outage planning by the design engineer who indicated the need for extensive overtime labor for equipment replacement in many critical plant areas. Each item of equipment being installed in this project is replacing an existing operational part of the plant power system. In every case, process disruption must be minimized, and thus specific transition procedures must be planned and followed. The plans and specifications for the remaining portions of Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, called J-33-1A, were completed in October 2000. SPEC Services, Inc performed the design. Staff recommends a budget increase of$2,116,000, approval of plans and specifications, and authorization for public advertisement for bids. Page 1 Upon approval of this item, the J-33-1A Construction Contract will be advertised for public bidding and will be brought to the Board of Directors to be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder. The equipment being replaced in this project varies in age from 12 to 30 years and is in deteriorated condition due to corrosion and overloading. If this equipment is not replaced, there is increasing risk of failures, outages, and sewage spills. Please refer to the attached Project Scope Item Data Table for further information. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The attached Budget Information Table shows a proposed budget increase of $2,116,000 for a total revised budget of$19,486,000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 200012001 Budget, Section e—Page 97) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. Under"Proposed Budget Increase," $2,504,000 is being requested to adjust the budget for the final engineer's estimate of probable cost for the J-33-1A Construction Contract and $388,000 from Contingency is being requested to offset this increase. The remaining $1,152,000 will provide 10 percent contingency for the J-33-1A Construction Contract. The proposed source of funding is from the District's Capital Improvement Reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The design contract for the overall J-33-1 project was awarded to SPEC Services, Inc., in September 1998. The scope of the project includes the installation of additional standby generators and replacement of deteriorated and underrated electrical equipment such as main 12,000 Volt Switchgear lineups, 480 Volt Switchgear and Motor Control Centers (MCC's), Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS's). Wherever possible, new equipment has been designed to route power through at least two pathways to increase the reliability of power to downstream processes. The existing equipment items being replaced in this project have been specifically targeted for replacement by previous electrical studies. These items represent less than half of the overall plant power distribution systems. Job No. J-25-4, Electrical Power Studies, is in the process of evaluating the remaining parts of the distribution systems that need attention less urgently. Page 2 Staff decided early in 1999 to accelerate completion of one scope Item, the Plant No. 2 Headworks Standby Power Facility, in order to be prepared for possible Y21K related power outages. The Construction Contract for that facility was designated J-33-1. After completing the design of that portion, SPEC Services, Inc. continued design on the remaining scope items of the project, completing in October 2000. The Construction Contract for the remaining work has been designated as J-33-1A to distinguish it from the first Construction Contract. The remaining construction work will involve many parts of the power systems of both treatment plants, especially Plant No. 2. Construction outages must be carefully phased to keep disruptions of plant processes to a minimum. In addition, outages will not be permitted during rainy weather. At least two years are necessary for the construction contract to allow for this phasing of the work. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan EIR, certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Project Scope Item Data Table JCM:jak:jo:gc H:hrp.afta"enderBaaM Agenda Reports@000 Board Agenda Repodo I2 \➢em"0 doo Page 3 Attachment(1) BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AMENDMENT TO JOB NO. J-33-1 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REMAINING PORTION,J-33-IA ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Pro ecl Development $ 451,565 S 451.565 S 451,566 $ 451.565 $ 451,554 100% Studies4Permillin $ 347.000 $ 34T.000 $ 347,000 $ 347.000 $ 346,683 IN% Consultant PEA $ 2,350.935 IS 2,350.935 S 2.350.935 $ 2,350.935 $ 2.178,973 93% Design Staff $ 461,600 is 461.600 $ 461.600 $ 461.600 $ 338,619 73% Construction Contract $ 11.199.000 $ 2.50,1 000 S 13,703.000 $ 3.131.686 $ 3,131.886 S 2.598.558 as% Construction ACmin $ 419.900 $ 419.900 S 15,000 S 15,000 $ 14.261 95% Construction Inspection $ 60D.000 S 600.000 $ 600,000 '• $ 600,D00 S 209490 35% Contingency $ 1.540,000 S 388000 $ 1,152.000 $ Relmbursable Costs $ TOTAL S 15,391,000 $ 17.370.000 3 2.116.000 $ 19,486,000 $ 7,357,986 $ $ 7,357,9B6 $ 6,138,138 83% Pending prior approval of Agenda Item for J-33-1 Change Order tl5 at this meeting. These amounts are related to the existing construction contract for the Plant No.2 Headworks Standby Power Facility,Job No.J-33-1. 6'1vy. Y { 115V]31P�Bu4elI PrMM eR Fwm R.PerW!!E F,u0-3I.]1 Hq0 PROJECT SCOPE ITEM DATA Attachment(2) STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO.J-33.1 EXISTINGCONSTRUCTION DESIGN SCOPE ITEM REASON EQPT AGE RISKS PROJECT NO. STANDBY POWER IMPROVEMENTS: Install New Standby Power Facility for Plant 2 Exisling generators were 25 years old and 25 yrs Sewage spill would have occurred A slag J-33-1 Ileadworks(Separated from overall scope and could not power enough pumps for peak was unable to respond In time. If power constructed In time for Y2K Under Conslruction flow;power had to be switched over by failure occurred at peak Am,not enough Contract J-33-1) hand;new system is big enough and pumps could be operated and spill could automatically switches over. have resulted. Upgrade Existing Standby Power Systems at Plant 1, Existing generator switches break down 15 yrs Possible sewage spill during power J-33-1A Power Bldg 3A,4 frequently,reducing available power; outage A not enough generators are on maintenance on the generefor ge bus can Ane for quantity of pumps needed only be done by turning off the entire power building. Evaluate Standby Power System for Ocean Outiall Existing trailer-mounted generators are 25 25 yrs If power outage occurs al high Am, J-33-1A Pumping Facilities at Plant 2 years old and cannot power enough pumps effluent will few through Ouffall No.3 for peak Am;power must be swilched by (Santa Ana River). hand;should be aulomalic. NOTE: The study indicates the need for a$12 million facility which will be built under a different project. Upgrade Existing Standby Generator System at Existing switchgear is underrated to handle 25 yrs If a short circuit occurs with all 4 gens J-33-IA Plant 2 short circuits when running all four operating,switchgear could self-destruct, generators at the same time;presently causing Nrmer damage,bigger outages. limited to only 2 out of 4 at a time. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS: UpgraderReplace(33)Motor Control Centers Existing MCCs are underrated to handle 20-30 yrs If a heavy short circuit occurs,circuit J-33AA (MCVs)at both Plants heavy short circults. breaker could self-destruct,causing further damage,bigger outages. Replace 480 Volt Switchgear at Plant 2 Cengen Existing switchgear Is outside and in 12 yrs If this swilchgear falls,the entire Plant 2 J-33-IA deteriorated condition;must be replaced. Cengen will go down for 1.2 days. Upgrade/Replace(8)12.000 Volt Switchgear lineups Existing equipment is 25 years old and In 25 yrs Each lineup powers a major portion of J43-IA at Plant 2 deteriorated condllion,must be replaced. Plant 2 process. NNp.aaWenprli0UN11baEWJ.]J.1A-33.1 a 1A Scope Butlers PROJECT SCOPE ITEM DATA Attachment(2) STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO.J-33-1 EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DESIGN SCOPE ITEM REASON EOPT AGE RISKS PROJECT NO. Upgrade Existing Gas Compressor Electrical System Existing electrical system has only one 15 yrs If power is lost to gas compressors, J-33-IA at Plant 2 per feeder spliced Into Thickener facility; digester gas must be vented to cannot perform maintenance without atmosphere. Cengen at Plant 2 must affecting both facilities and curtailing gas turn off generators due to gas shortage. compression. Replace(S)Existing Variable Frequency Drives Cannot get replacement parts;drives are 15 yrs If drive falls,the pump run by that drive Is J-33-IA (VFDs)at Plant 1 Headworks 2 and Plant 2 obsolete technology wnich wastes power do"for as long as II lakes to get a fixed Headworks C and loads down generators needlessly. (no bypass). Headworks pumping capacity is reduced. Replace(2)Uninlenuptible Power Systems(UPS's) Existing UPS units fall at critical times, 12 yrs If UPS does not provide backup during J-33-IA systems at Plant Cengen affecting entire Cengen operations;have power failure,the Cengen Engines go been repeatedly repaired without success. down and cannot be restarted until Maintenance Staff corrects problem. M ,detelananlobunWx,wJ-WA143-1 S to Scope l PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng DM TOBO.O(Dlr. 13-7-00 13-2D-00 AGENDA REPORT Ram Number 1W Number MCDO-85R 13(0) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Mullins, Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ADDENDUM NO. 2 FOR STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO TREATMENT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$370,058 for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-33-1, for a total project budget of$19,856,058; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with SPEC Services, Inc. for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$370,058, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $2,720,993. SUMMARY This project upgrades or replaces many existing electrical equipment items at both treatment plants that were determined to be deficient by prior electrical studies. One scope item, the Plant No. 2 Headworks Standby Power Facility, has already been constructed in order to meet Y21K readiness requirements. The Construction Contract for that facility was designated as J-33-1. The remaining portions of the original design scope have been designated as J-33-1A. SPEC Services, Inc. has finished the design for J-33-IA, and that portion of the project is now ready for construction bidding. Due to limited manpower, the Construction Management Division of the Engineering Department does not have a Construction Project Manager for this project. Staff is requesting through this Addendum, to fill the manpower shortage with the SPEC Services, Inc. Project Engineer, who designed this project. A proposal letter from SPEC Services, Inc. is attached indicating an amount of $370,058 to provide staffing for the anticipated two-year span of construction. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the PSA and this pending Addendum No. 2. No new facilities will be constructed as a result of Addendum No. 2. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000/2001 Budget,section a—Page 97) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. Under"Proposed Budget Increase", $370,058 is being requested to cover Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for this project for a total revised budget of$19,856,058, pending approval of the budget amendment for increased estimate of construction cost of J-33-1 A. The proposed source of funding is from the District's Capital Improvement Reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Job No. J-33-1, Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, involves the upgrade or replacement of many existing electrical equipment items at both treatment plants that were determined to be deficient by prior electrical studies. The Board awarded a PSA to SPEC Services, Inc., at the September 1998 meeting. The original design Scope of Work called for preparation of drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and support services during construction for all items listed in the project scope. In October 1999, the Board approved Addendum No. 1 to the PSA for additional work elements required for implementing the accelerated schedule for the Plant No. 2 Headworks Standby Power Facility, and for support of MCC replacements and Central Generation generator control wiring revisions. SPEC Services, Inc. has finished the remainder of the design for J-33-1, and it is now ready for construction bidding. The Construction Contract for this remaining work has been designated as J-33-1A. Construction Proiect Management Staffing Once bids are received and a construction contract is awarded to the successful bidder, Staff management of the project will be handed off from the Design Division of the Engineering Department to a Construction Project Manager in the Construction Division. Normally, one of the existing Construction Project Managers would be assigned to manage this project. At this time, however, there are not enough Construction Project Managers to manage all of the projects in construction. Page 2 ` In addition to the shortage of manpower, Job No. J-33-lA is a large electrical project affecting many process areas of both treatment plants, and will require careful attention to outage planning and coordination with Operations and Maintenance staff, as well as with other projects under construction. The Construction Project Manager for this project must be familiar with the technical issues involved in taking vital portions of the treatment plant electrical systems out of service, and reworking them without causing extensive process disruptions. Staff is requesting that the Board approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for SPEC Services, Inc. to provide a Construction Project Manager to manage the J-33-IA construction project. The person proposed is the lead engineer on the J-33-lA project, who has overseen all the work in the design phase. There are several advantages to this arrangement: • District Construction staff will not be overburdened with running this project. • The Consultant's lead engineer has been involved with this project since the start of design work, and is intimately familiar with all of the technical aspects of the project, especially planning for equipment outages. • He is already familiar with District staff in Operations and Maintenance as well as Engineering staff. • Since he managed design of the project, communications with other SPEC Services, Inc. design staff during construction should be enhanced. Field installation problems should be easier to resolve. The length of service for this Addendum would be two years to correspond with the length of the construction contract. SPEC Services, Inc. has submitted a proposal of$370,058 for this Addendum. Only services actually performed will be paid. ALTERNATIVES • The Construction Management Division could hire permanent or other temporary Staff to run this project. Staff would have to be released at the end of the project and no other temporary Staff is so well qualified for the work. Page 3 I • This project could be deferred until existing District Construction Management staff is available to manage it. Given that the number of projects in construction is expected to increase rather than decrease, this condition will not occur for several years. Also, the project scope involves mandatory corrections of code deficiencies that should be addressed sooner rather than later. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan EIR, certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal Letter from SPEC Services, Inc. dated October 31, 2000 JCM:jak:jo:gc HAwp.MabgendMBoard Agenda RepaftQ000 Board Agenda Repods\i=Utem 13(g).doe Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR JOB NO. J-33-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED THIS ESTIMATED FUNDSAUTHOR12ED PROPOSEDTOTAL PROJECTRABH AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZATION E%TO DATE BUDGET BUDGET• INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE ,F 4 Proed Develo mart $ 451.565 $ 451.565 $ 451,565 $ 451,565 $ 451,554 100%-- StudlesiP,mitling $ 347,000 S 347,000 $ 347,000 $ 347,000 $ 346,683 100% Consultant PSA $ 2.350.935 $ 370056 $ 2.720.993 S 2,350.935 3 370058 S 2.720.993 $ 2.178.973 80% Design Staff $ 481,600 $ 461,600 $ 461,600 It 461,600 E 338.619 73% Constmctlon Contrad $ 13,703,000 $ 13,703.000 $ 3.131.886 $ 3.131 886 '•' $ 2598.558 83% Conslmdlon Admin $ 419,900 $ 419.000 $ 15.000 $ 15,000 "' $ 14,261 95% ConsWUlon Ins"Mon $ 600.000 E 600.000 $ 600.000 - 8 600.000 "- $ 209,490 35% Contingency $ 1.152.000 It 1,152,000 $ Reimbursable Cosls $ TOTAL $ 15,391.000 $ 19,486.000 If 370,058 $ 19,856,058 $ 7,357,988 It 370,058 $ 7.728,044 S SJ30,138 ]9% Pending prior approval of Agenda Item for J-33-1 Budget Amendment at this meeting. ••Pending prior approval of Agenda Item for J-33-1 Change Order#5 at this meeting. •"These amounts are related to the existing construction contract for the Plant No.2 Headworks Standby Power Facility. klrq dlasn Wlna ,, ..331AN .'M .I BIT Fq R"."31.ZXV Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J33-1 Standby Power and Reliability Improvements To Treatment Plants 1 and 2 Total Project Budget: $19,856,058 Consultant: SPEC Services, Inc. Start Date of Project: September 23, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 9/23198 Original PSA Standby Power& Reliability Improvements, $2,121,748.00 $2,121,748.00 Job. No. J-33-1 10/27/99 Addendum 1 Additional Work on MCC's, Cengen Controls, $229,187.00 $2,350,935.00 Plant No. 2 Headworks Standby Facility Pending Addendum 2 Construction Project Management Support for $370,058.00 $2,720,993.00 Construction Contract J-33-1A JM{ak HAw .dWengWOB3&GONTRACTSV-33-1AG-33-1-e mWs mpod.dm 12/05/00 Revised OW14/98 5 � SPEC Services, Inc. i 17101 Bushard Street Fountain Valley CA 9270&2a33 SERVICES (7141 963-8077, FAX 17 1 41 963-0364 info®specservices.corn October 31,2000 Attn: Mr.Jim Mullins, P.E. Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 Ref: Revised Scope Costs-PSA ADDENDUM NUMBER 2 Job No. J-33-1A Standby Power and Reliability Improvements Dear Jim: SPEC Services is pleased to provide a budgetary cost of$370,058, in response to your request to provide a resident engineer during construction of the above referenced project. The proposed budget is based on your attached scope of work, is subject to the actual construction schedule, and incorporates the following assumptions: • The construction support period will be for two years commencing on or about March 2001 ending March 2003. • Part time support averaging 20 hours a week for six months at start-up from March through August 2001 and wind-down from September 2002 through February 2003 at normal office rates while working intermittently both from on-site offices provided by District, and from SPEC Services office. • Full time dedicated support averaging 50 hours a week for twelve months from September 2001 through August 2002 at field rates while working exclusively from on-site offices provided by District. This period will include support during weekend outages. • SPEC Services will provide substitute personnel during vacation or sick leave taken by the resident engineer. Supplemental support beyond the original or amended scopes of work may be negotiated to meet needs that arise during the project. • Mileage at $.033 per mile for five miles of daily travel between Plants land 2 will be reimbursed. • Field rates will apply only when a minimum consecutive 6 month full time commitment to the project working at the Districts on-site facilities is initiated by formal notice from the District. Should the project workload fall below full time, the District and SPEC Services may mutually agree that the resident engineer can work on other SPEC Services projects, if any are available during that period,to maintain the field rate until the workload picks up. System Planning, Engineering &Coordinating Page 2 • Our proposed budget reflects annual salary adjustments of 3%,anticipated in July. • Office and field multipliers have been calculated and will be applied on the following basis: Office Field Labor+40%Burdens 1 1.40 1.40 Overhead on Burdened Labor 58% .81 46% .64 Profit on Burdened labor+ 6.8% .15 6.8% .14 Overhead Total Multiplier on Wages 2.36 2.18 Labor Hour Breakdown: Consulting Services Resident Project Engineer 3,529 Cost Breakdown: Consulting Services Burdened Labor $231,198 Office Mark-up $ 39,447 Field Mark-up $ 75,060 Fixed Profit at 6.8% $ 23,503 Direct Costs(mileage) $ 850 Total Cost $370,058 We would be happy to discuss any aspect of this addendum with you to clarify your questions or concerns.Please feel free to call me at(714)963-8077, extension 183. Very trulyf 1yours, Philip Peterson Project Manager PDC COMMITTEE M ng Dace To B&aDir. izaiOB izlzn/DD AGENDA REPORT "`n1Niin° """Numb" PDCDD-87 13(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Sejal Patel, Engineer SUBJECT: ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. SP19950063 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$19,300 for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063,for a total project budget of $271,000, (2) Approve plans and specifications for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a construction contract to Ark Construction Company, for Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, for an amount not to exceed $177,000. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Job No. SP19950063 were completed in September 2000. This project was designed by Lee & Ro, Inc. Job No. SP19950063 retrofits the existing storage bays at the Warehouse with structural walls to enclose open bays. This improvement will provide environmental protection against temperature variations, dust, and moisture, and will also provide security for the warehouse inventory. The plans and specifications for this project, Enclosure of Open Bays in Warehouse at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP19950063, were bid on October 24, 2000. Current Project Budget $251,700 Construction Budget $170.000 Engineers Estimate $157,000 Low Responsible Bid $177,000 High Bid $261,092 Number of Bids 5 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The engineer's estimate for Job No. SP19950063 is $157,000, the construction budget is $170,000, and the lowest bid is $177,000. Authorization for a budget increase is being requested to allocate more funds for the Design staff, construction contract, construction administration, and construction inspection. X M9-WVpYW'8mG/.pe,W flN�U1MDBevC/prn,la flRya\1MpAwn 1]IN.Ga fl,,,,e, emus Page 1 v The budget request authorizes $1,800 for the Design staff (for the Board approval and bid process), $177,000 for the construction contract, $11,000 for the construction administration, and $11,000 for the construction inspection. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 2000-01 Budget, Section 8, Page 151) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The current project budget is $251,700. The requested total project budget is now $271,000. Staff requests an increase in the budget for the following: $1,800 for the Design staff; $7,000 for the construction contract; $4,500 for construction administration; and $6,000 for construction inspection. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The existing warehouse storage area at Plant No. 1 stores the plant's excess parts, equipment, machines, and materials. This storage area, currently being open, is prone to have environmental problems from temperature variations, dust, and moisture. Implementation of this project will provide environmental protection for stored items and will also provide additional security for the warehouse inventory. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 2, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary SP:jak G:lntglobelWgenda Draft ReportsWWSP19950063 AR 120700AW GNVcbWUganda D,al,R Pm PD kSP199WM Aft 120700dm ��y�: ea0.8 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP19950063 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ Studies/PermiBin $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1.000 100% Design Staff $ 11,400 $ 37,200 $ 1.800 $ 39.000 $ 37,200 $ 1.800 $ 39,000 $ 38.600 99% Consultant PSA $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ 15,000 $ 14,800 99% Construction Contract $ 44,000 $ 170,000 $ 7.000 $ 177.000 $ - $ 177,000 $ 177.000 $ 0% Construction Administration $ - $ 6,500 $ 4,500 $ 11,000 $ - $ 11000 $ 11,000 $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 - $ - $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 0% Contingency $ - $ 17,000 $ - $ 17.000 $ $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 60.400 $ 251,700 $ 19,300 $ 271,000 $ 53,200 $ 200.800 $ 254,000 $ 54,400 21% HiwP.dta%wMSM-PR0JECTS195 SMALL PROJECTS\SP950063-Open Bay Enclosures Of Plant 1 WarehouseUBUDGET TABLE.MatDistncls a I October 24, 2000 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP19950063 Engineer's Estimate: $156,987 Construction Contract Budget: $170,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Ark Construction $ 177,000 2. Varkel Construction $ 195,000 3. RJS Contractors/Train Johnson $ 218,900 4. MVP Commercial, Inc. $ 219,820 5. Adams/Mallory $ 261.092 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend awardJq ARK CONSTRUCTION in the bid amount of $177,000 as the lowest and best bid. ,,(( David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering HAM.tlb\en01SM-PROJECTS\95 SMALL PROJECTS\Sp950063-Open Bay Enclosures at Plant 1 Warehouse\SP19950063 BID TAB.doc R"Isep 0511MB OCSO a P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY ENCLOSURE OF OPEN BAYS IN WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP19950063 ARK CONSTRUCTION VARKEL CONSTRUCTION RJS CONTRACTORS Item Approx. Qly Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ $ 2 1 LumpSum $ 172,000.00 $ 172,000.00 $194,000.00 $194,000.00 $218,900.00 $218,900.00 :( Qt81:'.i.8.z $ 177,000:oO. $195,000.00i $278,900((0' 'Add(+)or Delete(-) $ - ; $ 17T,000.00` $19s,000iooi. $218,960 Qr ARK CONSTRUCTION VARKEL CONSTRUCTION RJS CONTRACTORS MVP COMMERCIAL ADAMSIMALLORY Item Approx. ply Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ - $ - $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ - $ - 2 1 Lump Sum $219,820.00 $219,820.00 $260.592.00 $260.592.00 $ $ - g1( :." ;;['; `$�2 .00; $ I 'Add (+)or Delete(-) $ MVP COMMERCIAL ADAMSIMALLORY S N:Wp.tllalen01A-PROJECTSaI5 SMALL PROJECTSISP650066-Open Bey Eim mums at Plant I Wnehouseg3P1050003 Bid Summary,elolSheeR 1 of 2 10/24/2000 PDC COMMITTEE Noun Da T'ad.0rq 12.7-W 12-2000 AGENDA REPORT 1c Number I"M.m PO000-6a Rom 13M Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: PLANT NO. 2 HEADWORKS PILOT TESTING PROGRAM, JOB NO. P2.66-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget of$623,200 for Plant No. 2 Headworks Pilot Testing Program, Job No. P2-66-1; and (2) Authorize the Purchasing Manager to enter into a Sole Source contract with Infilco Degremont Inc., for the Purchase and Installation of Two Bar Screen Racks, Rakes, and Appurtenances (Specification No. M064) for an amount not to exceed $240,150. SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District is planning to construct a new Headworks facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.66, to replace the existing Headworks which is almost 40 years old and reaching the end of its useful life. In order to minimize capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs, Staff recommends that a pilot testing program be conducted to confirm the design criteria for the bar screens and to select the type and size of screenings handling equipment. Since the poor condition of the bar screen facility at Plant No. 2 would make pilot testing difficult, Staff recommends that the pilot testing be performed at Plant No. 1. This program would include the replacement of specific bar screen components on two of the existing bar screens at Plant No. 1. The bar screen retrofit at Plant No. 1 comes at a fortuitous time, as the bar screens are due for a major overhaul. The replacement of the bar screen components is considered equipment maintenance work rather than a public works construction project. As such, Staff recommends that Infilco Degremont, Inc. (IDI) be awarded a sole source contract, as the original equipment manufacturer, to supply and install the bar screen components. This approach will ensure that the bar screen components are installed in accordance with the original specifications. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approval is being requested for a Purchase Order to IDI in the amount of $240,150. The requested Purchase Order amount has not been budgeted. A transfer of funds from the Capital Improvements Reserve Funds is being requested. The attached Budget Information Table indicates authorization of $198,200 for design staff to cover Engineering and O&M laboratory and staff \MEmWb1Y\q.Em\vpaM.�Ba.N f.R.p.LL�PM Ap R.p kl1fOAsn IM.. x Rs . v Page 1 labor, $287,000 for construction, including bar screen components and installation of temporary screenings washer equipment and $38,000 for t construction inspection and installation of the screenings washer. The total budget includes funds for future temporary installation of a bar screen washer under the General Managers signature authority. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A request is being made to create a budget for P2-66-1, in the amount of $623,200 from the Capital Improvements Reserve Funds. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Background Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff began the preliminary design of the Plant No. 2 Headworks (P2-66) in March of 2000, in order to determine layout and design requirements. The preliminary studies concluded that climber type bar screens with bar spacing smaller than the existing (one-inch) screens, was the recommended technology. Bar screens with smaller spaces between bars will reduce materials that could enter the plant causing damage to the downstream process equipment such as digester mixing pumps. Selection of proper bar spacing to achieve optimal efficiency is an important decision on this project. It not only impacts screenings removal efficiency, but also the number and sizing of screens, plant influent hydraulics, maintenance requirements, the type and size of screenings handling equipment, and other facility requirements. The impact of reduced bar spacing varies greatly from plant to plant due to differences in wastewater characteristics and the collection system. It is, therefore, difficult to estimate how much additional material will be removed with a smaller bar spacing, and perhaps more importantly, how much additional organic matter will be removed. For these reasons, Staff recommends that two of the existing bar screens at Headworks 2, at Plant No. 1, be retrofitted to a smaller bar spacing and a pilot testing program be conducted to: • Confirm design criteria for the proposed bar screens at Plant No. 2, including bar spacing, sizing, capacity, and head loss • Evaluate bar screen performance at a smaller bar spacing G MyyMaMpe,ga paM1 R¢pnAWCW3K1 fID]%M.Oa[ Page 2 • Evaluate screenings handling requirements based on removal rate and o characteristics of the screened material. It is suggested that the bar screen retrofit be implemented at Plant No. 1 rather than at Plant No. 2, because the Plant No. 2 Headworks will be abandoned upon completion of the new Headworks. In addition, the existing Plant No. 2 bar screen facility has problems with isolation gates and structural limitations that would complicate the retrofit procedure. Retrofitting the bar screens at Plant No. 1 would continue to provide sufficient capacity to handle the current normal dry weather peak daily flow. The capacity of each screen with 5/8- inch bar spacing would be 56 to 84 mgd. This would allow the entire flow to be handled solely by the two retrofitted screens. If a significant amount of additional organic matter is removed from screens with smaller bar spacings, it may be necessary to include a screenings washing process. To this end, the pilot testing program will also include the testing of two types of screenings washing equipment in conjunction with the bar screens to evaluate washer performance and establish design criteria. PJect Scooe The project scope for the bar screen retrofit would consist of: • Ordering the appropriate parts from the original equipment manufacturer • Requiring the equipment manufacturer to remove the bar racks and rakes from the existing equipment and replace them with new racks and rakes • Utilizing Orange County Sanitation District staff to oversee the installation of the equipment; operate the new equipment; and measure and analyze the material removed by the modified equipment and compare it to similar data for the existing unmodified equipment. The project scope for the screenings washer would consist of: • Removing one of the bins in the Bin Storage Building and placing a screenings washer in the same location • Providing plumbing (water and drain) and electrical connections to the washer • Installing a shaftless screw conveyor to convey the washed solids to the adjacent storage bin • Fabricating and installing a chute to convey the raw screenings from the top floor of the building to the washer. Data collection for the pilot testing program would occur over a four-month period after the equipment is installed. Following the test period, a report summarizing the results would be published. Conclusions and recommendations of the test report will be used to establish design criteria for the final design phase of the Plant No. 2 Headworks Improvements under Job No. P2-66. awgobaPAe Dmft neamemocwzasi IN7W Aa •a„a.a:a�.aa Page 3 Project Costs , V Staff recommends that a sole source contract be awarded to Infilco Degremont Inc. (IDI)for the purchase and installation of the bar screens. The cost of purchasing the equipment, submitting installation and disassembly drawings, providing three eight-hour man-days of field service and making two trips to the site by IDI is $179,150. In order to ensure competitive prices for the installation of the bar screens, Staff requested that IDI obtain three quotes for the installation of the equipment. The total IDI contract including the purchase and installation of bar screen components is $240,150. The budget established for the pilot testing program includes funds required for future temporary installation of the Hycor screenings washer under General Manager signature authority and the cost of Orange County Sanitation District staff to operate the washer, collect and analyze pilot test data, and prepare a report summarizing the findings. ALTERNATIVES Do not conduct pilot testing for Job No. P2-66. This alternative could result in the installation of unnecessary or extra process equipment on the Plant No. 2, Replacement Headworks Project. CEQA FINDINGS Replacement of the Plant No. 2 Headworks was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR. A supplemental EIR will be needed for the new Headworks. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table PK:jak:jo \XwbalMatalMtglobal\Agenda Draft Repm \PDMP2-66.1120700AR.doo GMlgroaMpan0ap aepMaNOLW2#f 1a7700•aAc R.W.d. 84099 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Plant No. 2 Headworks Pilot Testing Program JOB NO. P2-66-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ Design Staff $ 198.200 $ 198,200 $ 198.000 $ 198,000 Construction Contract $ 287,000 $ 287.000 $ 287.000 $ 287,0DO Construction Administration $ $ Construction Inspection $ 38.000 $ 38,000 $ 38.000 $ 38,000 Contingency $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL I $ - $ - 1 $ 623.200 1 $ 623.200 $ 523,000 $ 523,000 Construction Contract includes the cost to install bar screen components under a Purchase Order and future temporary screenings washer equipment under the General Manager signature authority. H.1 dl.kIIUCGS 8 CONTRACTSIP2-66 1QbA,I,nro fable 12 66-01 xlsl0islncl5 PDC COMMITTEE M nq Data Toed.o D AGENDA REPORT dem!!u Wr eam Num , rocooae txt Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Brian Bingman, Project Manager SUBJECT: TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS, JOB NO. P1-76 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an amount not to exceed $2,350,209. SUMMARY The 1999 Strategic Plan identifies a need to rehabilitate the existing trickling filters and add new trickling filter clarifiers. The existing trickling filters and trickling filler clarifier, which treat approximately 30 million gallons per day (MGD), have reached the end of their useful lives. In order to continue treatment through these processes, a complete rehabilitation or replacement of the facilities is necessary. The existing trickling filters and trickling filter clarifier have severe structural problems including the underdrain system, exterior walls, and clarifier cenlerwell. To allow for the addition of a future solids storage facility, the existing trickling filter clarifier will be removed and new clarifiers will be constructed in a different location within Plant No. 1. The Consultant is to provide engineering services for new trickling filter clarifiers and new or rehabilitated trickling filters. The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), Construction Documents, and Construction Support Services. Project Elements include, but are not limited to, utility research, geotechnical investigation, field surveying, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support services. Staff received proposals from the following six firms on October 10, 2000: Black & Veatch, Boyle Engineering, Brown and Caldwell, CH2MHILL/Carollo Engineers, Lee & Ro, and MSE/RWBeck. Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals and interviewed three firms on November 6, 2000. Staff recommends approval of a PSA for the engineering, design, and construction support services for new clarifiers and rehabilitation or replacement of the trickling filters with Black & Veatch for an amount not to exceed $2,350,209. See attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for more information. aw.nw�wnm,eoan N•�.Aewmv000 eo.,e ny.me.pomnAaium tbbz Page 1 The design work is estimated to take twenty months to complete and will begin within one month after the approval of the PSA. The completion of construction work is estimated to be June 30, 2004. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, is $21,000,000. Authorization of$2,350,209 for the Consultant PSA is being requested. See attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000I01 Budget Section 8, Page 8 and 79, Job No. P1-76) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This request includes the authorization of$280,000 for District staff, $2,350,209 for Consultant PSA, and an additional $20,000 for Project Development. Money will be moved from Contingency to Project Development and Consultant PSA to cover the expected costs. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Trickling Filters No. 1-3 and the remaining Trickling Filter Clarifier were constructed under District Job No. P1-9 in 1964 and Trickling Filter No. 4 was constructed by P1-9-1 in 1974. The decision whether to rehabilitate or build new trickling filters will be made during the first stages of this project and will be based on examination of the structural condition of the facilities. The trickling filter process is a cost effective secondary treatment alternative to the activated sludge process. Treating water through the trickling filter process can be as inexpensive as one-third the cost of treatment through the activated sludge process. The effluent from the trickling filters and clarifiers will be fed into the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW R)or gravity fed to Plant No. 2 for outfall discharge. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. ctragobff parda Draft RspaSTDC%P 1 76 PM M I I .dw Fanaad. a4t.8 Page 2 1 CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the previously approved 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was approved on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services BEB:jo:jak G:l IglobaPA enda D21t Repoft%PDCW1.76 PSA AR122000.Goc G:,VobaMgm G RepPM�1-7B PSAMIMN.d. A.„W..a Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers Job No. P1-76 . 1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED Safi. Yes PR AUTHORIZER PROJECT AUT PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL WEN I. @UDGEt BUDGET- INCREASEe BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO hb'II F Project Development $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 20,000 $ 33,000 $ 13,000 It 20,000 $ 33,000 $ 32.121 97% Studies/Permifting $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 1,894 3% ConsugStaff $ 1,200.000 $ 1.200,000 $ 1,150.209 $ 2,360,209 $ 2,350,209 $ 2,350,209 0% Desig $ 280.000 $ 280.000 $ 280.000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 6.428 2% Const $ 13,100.000 $ 13,100,000 $ 13,100,000 $ ConstAdmin $ 969.000 $ 969,000 $ 969,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 528,000 $ 528,000 $ 528.000 It Contingency $ 4,852,000 $ 4.852,000 $ (1,170.209) $ 3,681.791 - $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL 1 $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 It - $ 21.000,000 $ 71,000 $ 2.650.209 $ 2.721.209 $ 40.443 1% h.-wp.dWWgUobs ConeeM P1.76t9udget Imombtion Tede.xls Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers Job No. P1-76 Total Project Budget: $21,000,000 Consultant: Black & Veatch Start Date of Project: January 3, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs Pending Original PSA Design Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters $2,350,209 $2.350,209 and New Clarifiers H:IWp.dtabagWOaS&CONTRACTSIPI-76 Trickling Filter Rehabililation\PSA Status Report.doe BEB:Jo REHABILITATION OF TRICKLING FILTERS AND NEW CLARIFIERS JOB NO. P7-76 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Black &Veatch • Lee & Ro • Brown and Caldwell • MSE/RWBeck • CH2MHILL • Boyle Engineering Corp • Carollo Engineers • CGvL • Malcolm Pirnie Malcolm Pirnie and CGvL declined to submit a proposal. CH2MHILL partnered with Carollo Engineers and MSE/RWBeck partnered with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for this project. As a result, there were six responsive proposals received on October 10, 2000. On October 24, 2000, an internal review meeting was held with the District project team to reduce the number of consultants from six to three. All six firms where individually ranked and the top three were invited back for the interview process which was held on November 6, 2000. The review panel consisted of seven members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 6. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants —Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After conducting the interviews, the top three consulting firms were again individually ranked by each District project team member. The following summarizes the ranking results for the three firms: 1. Black &Veatch 2137 Points 2. CH2MHILUCarollo Engineers 1965 Points 3. Brown and Caldwell 1818 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked consultant: Black&Veatch (B & V) Black & Veatch had the highest-ranked proposal based on meeting the Districts' schedule, project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. B &V's understanding and analyses of the critical project issues including coordination with District personnel, coordination with other District projects, electrical/instrumentation issues, and process flexibility was the best compared to all of the other consultants. Several good ideas highlighted in B &V's proposal included odor control options, interface with Groundwater Replenishment Project, automation issues, electrical system enhancements, and project coordination. The staffs' qualifications presented were good and had the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project team, including the sub-consultants, is well organized based upon specialties and division of work. Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the sealed fee proposals submitted by the three interviewed firms, were opened. The top ranked consultant, Black &Veatch, submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Black &Veatch's fee proposal is 17.7% lower than the second lowest fee proposal submitted by the team of CH2MHILUCarollo Engineers, the second ranked consultant. Staff recommends Black& Veatch be awarded the Professional Services Agreement for the Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for a total fee not to exceed $2,350,209.00 BEB:jo WadonWeta I%wp.dlatengUOBS&CONTRACTS\P1-76 Trickling Filter RebabilitatioMSTAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL.doc TABLE 1.0 REHABILITATION OF TRICKLING FILTERS AND NEW CLARIFIERS, JOB NO. P1-76 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Black & Veatch Brown and Caldwell CH2MHILL/Carollo Reviewer 318 250 260 Reviewer B 341 306 263 Reviewer C 295 200 295 Reviewer D 337 296 302 Reviewer 275 242 261 Reviewer 285 293 324 Reviewer G 286 231 260 Total Score 2137 1818 1965 (2450 Points Maximum) Average Score 305 260 281 (350 Points Maximum) Workforce Estimate 22,319 21,604 23,902 (Man-hours) 100% Design Completion Proposed 87 87 87 (Weeks) Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $2,350,209 $2,546,000 $2,765,283 Me�n9 Date To eE.W Oir. PDC COMMITTEE Izn�oo I�/zaiao AGENDA REPORT Item Number Imm MMW vorno-so 13(k) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Sejal Patel, Engineer SUBJECT: SPACE ALLOCATION & INTERIOR RENOVATION, JOB NO. J-84 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget of$244,300 for a needs assessment(Phase 1)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services to complete a needs assessment (Phase 1)for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84,for an amount not to exceed $156,800. SUMMARY The existing office space and facilities are inadequate for the long-tens need of the Orange County Sanitation District(District). Historically, as the District's Administrative staff needs grew, the personnel were accommodated in existing facilities wherever space was available, or additional interim facilities were added to address the specific need. This has resulted in inefficiency in space utilization and de-centralization of individual divisions and departments. Professional services are required to define and outline the project for implementing interior renovation, incorporating the current spacing needs, and a vision to change the culture/environment at Plant No. 1. The Consultant will meet with District staff and discuss the current problems and needs, future needs, strategic direction, the District's vision of the Administration Building, projected staffing levels, practicality, feasibility, budget constraints, interior space design, and fumishings. Aside from the physical space, a major goal of this project includes facility modification to facilitate an overall culture change, creating a work environment that promotes increased productivity through teaming and sharing of knowledge, information, and ideas. Any modifications and/or new facilities will be designed and built to help create a professional and transparent atmosphere. Staff sent a Request for Proposals(RFP)to nine firms and received proposals from two firms, Fluor Signature Services and Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. on August 24, 2000. Staff has evaluated the proposals in accordance with the District's policy and recommends award of a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) to Fluor Signature Services for an amount not to exceed$156,800. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff is requesting that a project budget for this job totaling $244,300 be established. The attached Budget Information Table Indicates authorization of$197,300, that includes $3,200 for project development, $37,300 for Design staff, and $156,800 for Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA). BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This is a new project, and therefore, a budget does not currently exist. Staff is requesting a total of$244,300 from the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Capital Improvements Reserve Funds. This budget request authorizes $197,300 for project development, Design staff, and Consultant PSA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In 1996, a consulting firm was hired to conduct a space utilization study at Plant No. 1. However, due to the subsequent changes to the staffing levels, no implementation was made as a result of this study. There are several staffing issues that need to be addressed. The 35 staff members of the Information Technology Department are currently housed in "temporary" trailers in the treatment process area; the Source Control inspectors need to move to the Administration Building to allow more efficient interaction with the rest of the Source Control Staff; the Construction Management Staff facilities at Plant No. 1 will have to be moved or demolished to provide room for the planned trickling filter clarifiers. There are also storage and parking problems that need to be tackled. Source Control Division is short of storage area for files, documents, reports, and correspondence. Accounting Division needs to move its storage area from the Control Center to the Administration Building to allow more space for the Operations & Maintenance staff, and to access the stored material promptly. Parking has been a problem in the recent past within the Administration front and rear parking lot. Employees are forced to park on the North perimeter road. In April 2000, the District staff developed three options for space allocation to address the Increasing needs for additional office space and parking problems. However, Staff believed that ultimately this was a quick fix, short-tens approach that would not adequately address the needs of the District. Staff then determined that consultant services are required to analyze the District's options, and to work with the Executive Management Team's needs such as the work group functionality and circulation, space needs for office and storage, a need for interior remodeling to reflect a changed culture/vision, common area modifications, and parking issues. Page 2 This is Phase I of a three-phase project. The Consultant will conduct a needs assessment to define and outline the project. Phase II of this project will be to develop a conceptual design. Phase III will be to prepare plans and specifications for construction. Proposal Evaluation Staff solicited proposals from nine fines qualified for the project. One firm declined due to the lack of Staff. Six other firms declined due to lack of interest. Based on the proposal evaluation of the remaining two firms, Fluor Signature Services demonstrated excellent understanding of and approach to the Scope of Work. Fluor also offers a very good project team that consists of a project management group, concept development group, and a culture/vision group. Further, Fluor presented a good methodology and process to work with the District to achieve the desired results in a timely and cost effective manner. ALTERNATIVES 1. Award the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 2. Do not proceed with the project. This will affect Job No. P1-76, Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers. Currently the project team for P1-76 is looking at the Construction Management Trailers' Facilities as one of the locations for establishing trickling filter facilities. The idea is to move the Information Technology(IT) staff into a permanent office structure, move the Construction staff into the IT trailers, and demolish the Construction trailers. Source Control will be affected tremendously, as its staff will remain separated and the division will have no room for storage. CEQA FINDINGS Phase I of Job No. J-84, Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, is exempt under Class 6 of Section 15306. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals SP jak c:wg1abaMgenda Drefi ReportMPDCU-64 AR 120700.dm Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SPACE ALLOCATION & INTERIOR RENOVATION JOB NO. J-84 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 3,200 $ 3.200 S 3,200 $ 3.200 $ 2,500 78% Studies/PermiWn $ Design Staff $ 37,300 $ 37.300 $ 37.300 $ 37.300 Consultant PSA $ 156,800 $ 156.800 $ 156.800 $ 156,800 Construction Contract Construction Administration Construction Inspection Contingency $ 47.000 $ 47,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 244,300 $ 244,300 $ - $ 197.300 $ 197,300 $ 2,500 1% H:% a.dlelenBUOBS&CONTRACTSU-04 Space Alb llon&Interior RerwvelianllJ-84 BUDGET TABLE.xislDlsuicts Professional Services Agreement Status Report Space Allocation and Interior Renovation Job No. J-84 PHASE Total Project Budget: $244,300 Consultant: Fluor Signature Services Start Date of Project: January 5, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs Pending Original PSA Phase I — Needs Assessment and $156,800 $156,800 Programming, to define and outline the project. H:%wp.dtaleng%J0BS&CONTRACTSU44 Space Allocation&Interior RenovallonU-84 PSA Status Retwrt.doc SPACE ALLOCATION AND INTERIOR RENOVATION JOB NO. J-64 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Professional Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. • Fluor Signature Services • McLarand Vasquez Emsiek • Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc. • AREA • DMJM Rotlet • Felderman & Keatinge Associates • Ridgway Associates Planning & Design • LPA, Inc. McLarand Vasquez Emsiek; Helmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.; AREA; DMJM Rotlet; Felderman & Keatinge Associates; Ridgway Associates Planning & Design; and LPA, Inc. declined to submit a proposal. As a result, there were two responsive proposals received on August 24, 2000. Proposals were then distributed for review and ranking by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of 5 members. Each proposal was evaluated using a rating system from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work-- Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After reviewing and grading the proposals, the two consulting firms were again individually ranked by each District project team member. The following summarizes the ranking results: 1. Fluor Signature Services 1,574 Points 2. Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,203 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked consultant: Fluor Signature Services (Fluor) Fluor had the highest-ranked proposal based on the project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable Staff qualifications, and team organization. Fluor's understanding of the District's vision, objectives, and goals are the best compared to the other firm. Several good ideas highlighted in Fluor's proposal included level of details, degree of involvement, work plan and approach, formation of the project team, and project coordination. The Staffs' qualifications presented are excellent, and had the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project team is well organized based upon specialties and division of work. They presented an outstanding understanding of the District's goals and the effort required to achieve the desired results. Fee Proposals The top ranked consultant, Fluor, submitted the higher fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Fluor's fee proposal is 3 times higher than Lord Fleming's fee proposal; however, Fluor is proposing much more time, effort and labor hours to realistically produce the desired end-result. Flour has a very good understanding of space needs, and connection between the people, space and organizational culture. Staff recommends Fluor Signature Services be awarded the PSA for the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, for a total fee not to exceed $156,800. SP:jak H9wp.dlMengVOeS&CONTRACTSQ-84 Space Allmaeon 8lntetlor RenovaOonU-84 Staff Evaluallon RepotlAoc TABLE 1.0 SPACE ALLOCATION AND INTERIOR RENOVATION, JOB NO. J-80 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Fluor Signature Services Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. Reviewer A 335 229 Reviewer B 350 225 Reviewer C 265 252 Reviewer D 283 204 Reviewer E 341 293 Total Score 1574 1203 1400 Points Maximum Average Score 315 240 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 1,169 490 Man-hours 100% Design Completion 60 60 Proposed (Days)_ Proposed Not to Exceed $156,719.00 $49,500.00 Fee PDC COMMITTEE Memn9Dax To13/3ea.0/00aar. r Wog/o9 AGENDA REPORT 1WM Numlw imm Number PD03D-91 13a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: ON-CALL COMPUTER MODEL SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for additional services for On-Call Computer Modeling Services for an additional amount of$100,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed to$225,000. SUMMARY The computer model of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) collection and treatment systems, developed by Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM) for the 1999 Strategic Plan, continues to be used by the District to plan and justify the need for new projects. Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement(PSA)with CDM will provide computer model analyses for at least seven additional projects not identified in the existing on-call (blanket) PSA with CDM, which began in April 2000. These hydraulic analyses are considered to be vital in the project development of each project and will continue to be used in the foreseeable future. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY It is estimated that an additional $100,000 will be needed to complete the below listed modeling. The original $125,000 fee will probably be exceeded upon completing modeling for Job No. J403. The original budget did not consider the need for as many projects, nor as much in-depth analysis as is being done now. The on-call services will continue to be performed on a time-and-material basis using an hourly billing rate. CDM will continue to provide an estimate of the level of effort for Staff review in advance of all work. CDM will not begin work until an authorized Notice-to-Proceed is received from the District. The on-call service agreement would have a cumulative total not to exceed $225,000. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Strategic Plan, Job No. J403) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Consultant fees for updating the model will be charged against Job No. J40-3. Model runs for specific collection system projects will be charged against those individual project budgets. \YOor,W Wt Wp.ChVpWBmN Ipw9 FKpY1'lIKA 9+N�p,W R�pvb\13CW1�„1]�11Cc[ n.e.w. ermnr Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A computer model of the Orange County Sanitation District's(District) collection and treatment systems was developed by Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM) and used to determine deficiencies in the collection system, and to analyze treatment scenarios as part of the development of the 1999 Strategic Plan. In April 2000, the District contracted through an eighteen-month on-call (blanket) Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with CDM, the Strategic Plan consultant, to perform ongoing computer modeling services for necessary hydraulic design considerations. The services provide Engineering with the ability to "fine tune" the implementation of the 20 year Capital Improvement Program, incorporate updated information (e.g. latest flow measurements, land use, etc.) not available in the initial Strategic Plan analysis, and evaluate alternatives for sewer improvements and expansion projects. Models developed for the Strategic Plan analysis include the EXTRAN model for the collection system, the STORM model for wet-weather flow projections, and a facilities model to project future process needs at the treatment plants. Under the blanket PSA, CDM has performed modeling of the collection system on an as-needed basis. Staff will continue to develop a Scope of Work for each model run that is to be completed by the Consultant. The Consultant will submit a brief proposal addressing the model configuration, schedule, and estimated fee to complete the work for each task. Upon agreement on the Scope of Work, model configuration and estimated cost, the Consultant will be issued a task order to proceed with the work. On-call services have been used, or are currently ongoing, on the following projects: 1. 1-2-4 Bushard Trunk Rehabilitation: The Bushard Trunk can be "dried up" during construction w/o pump bypassing by various diversion settings and use of the Ellis Pump Station. 2. 2-49 Taft Branch Improvements: The project was determined unnecessary at this time. 3. J-67 Peak Flow Management: To determine benefit of Irvine Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer offsite storage at Irvine Ranch Water District's Michelson Wastewater Reclamation Plant during peak wet weather flow. 4. 5-49 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 5. 5-50 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 6. 5-51 Rehabilitation of the 14" Street Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 7. 5- 52 Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 8. 2-31 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief—A/2-50 Atwood Subtrunk Improvements: To determine the necessity of Contract No. 2-50. On-call services are planned for the following projects: 1. J-40-3 Strategic Plan: To update the base model's land use, wet weather data, (El Niho storms), diversion structure settings, etc. 2. 3-52 Rehabilitation of Westside Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 3. 5-53 Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 4. 5-54 Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 5. 11-28 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station: To determine ultimate peak wet weather flow. 6. 11-22 Warner Avenue Relief: To determine hydraulic need for the project. 7. 7-36 Gisler-Redhill System Improvement-A/7-39 Orange Trunk Improvement/ 7-41 Gisler-Redhill-North Trunk improvements: To determine hydraulic need for the project. Tasks to be performed under the blanket Professional Services Agreement (PSA) include: • Performing model runs to identify and evaluate impacts of increased flows from new developments in the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) service area. • Performing model runs to evaluate alternatives for sewer system improvements and expansion projects. • Evaluating impacts of operational changes such as diversion of flow between trunk sewer systems. • Revising land use and drainage area information from City General Plans. • Incorporating future collection system projects into the model. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve Addendum No. 1. Should Addendum No.1 not be approved, information to determine the necessity of a project or to evaluate the project's hydraulic conditions would be incomplete. The District would not have the ability to use the model(s)to fine tune the 20 year, $220M collection system Capital Improvement Program as changes occur in the service area that were not considered in the initial Strategic Plan effort. CEQA FINDINGS None required ATTACHMENTS Professional Services Agreement Status Report WC:jo:jak G:Nt&I Mp nd.DnR Re d,7DCVAWd.g AR 130100.E GM100bNAg•de Olen�elln AR 13W00. x Rb.w Mwae Page 3 Professional Services Agreement Status Report On-call Computer Services for 1999 Strategic Plan Models Total Project Budget: $ 225,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 1, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated costs 4/26/00 Original PSA Blanket Purchase Order for On-call Computer Not to Exceed Services for 1999 Strategic Plan Models $125,000 $125,000 Pending Addendum Additional On-Call Computer Modeling Services for Not to Exceed $225,000 No. 1 1999 Strategic Plan Model $100,000 H9wp.dtetengUOBS&COHTRACTSSTRAT PLAW40-3@000\Onrall Computer Services PSA Status Report.doc PDC COMMITTEE nnanQ QI[! Ta,!VDir. 1y7/00 11/70/00 A 1OeJ1 WMW 10n1 ftn AGENDA REPORT PDm 81 13(m) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Engineer SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$10,439, increasing the total contract amount to $1,527,673. SUMMARY Change Order No. 5 includes six items of added work to Job No. J-33-1. There are two omissions and no errors associated with this change order. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $3,000 per day. Contract Start Date July 22, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date March 17, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date April 12, 2000 Revised Completion Date April 12, 2000 Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 1,290,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 227,234.00 This Change (Add) $ 10,439.00 Change Orders to Date $ 237,673.00 Percentage Increase to Dale` 18.42 % Amended Contract Price $ 1,527,673.00 'This percentage includes a $60,000 bonus payment made to the contractor for completion of the standby power facilities constructed at Plant No. 2 prior to the Y2K event. Without the bonus payment, change order percentage to date would equal 13.8%. �1\ ��Ry'4 fl,Y AA P�11�1] ) Rw move Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 4.c, Inter-Plant and Joint FaGli0es) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. When the FY2000/01 budget was prepared for J-33-1, errors in fund allocation were made although the overall budget amount was unaffected. The result of these errors was that some line item amounts previously authorized by the Board (e.g., Consultant PSA) appeared to be over budget when in fact they were not. The Budget Information Table shows the correction of these errors. No contingency funds are being used to make these corrections and the overall budget amount remains unchanged. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. J-33-1, Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, includes constructing a standby power facility to provide power to the Plant 2 Headworks facility in an emergency. SPEC Services prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Southern Contracting Company on June 23, 1999. The job is 92% complete. The following summarizes the change order. item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Cable Bus Modifications $6 016 Changed Conditions 2 ModifyGuard Posts $1 573 Changed Conditions 3 Fuel System Modifications $1 397 Omission 4 Delete Wall Reinforcement $250 Desi n Chan e 5 Additional Ledger Angle $361 Omission 6 ModifyTermination Lugs $1 392 Design Change TOTAL—Change Order No. 5 $10 439 0 ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the previously approved programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 11nem�ewt�.Pftugw �MAwda Rep WBu Now R6p 11xarem tapnl Ro , WM Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. J-33-1 CURRENT PR ED b0 TED ORIGINAL PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED- PROJECt R ET C T' - PROPOSED TOTAL PROJECTnASR AUTD R C BUDGET HILT ON PT, BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION E%PENDITURE FJIPENDEtl TO BUUDDGETET ,C(P 00101. G SONS.. BU T ,. . INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST TO DATE- DATE(%) Proecl Devek, menl $ 451000 S2. &4,;i65, $ 01.505 451655 S 451.565 $ 461.555 S 461,51 100% c . studlosPimmlwng S 347.000 lc n+ `,.1- E 39A00 S 347000 U7000 $ 347.000 S 345.583 100% ConeMllenl PEA 21E0000 r-!',MOVE $ 2.350,9351 f� S 235003E S 235005 S 2,350,83E $ 317BB13 0% Da nSWK S 206AW :4!e>vv ; $ 4B1.B00 S IBi B00 i 461,800 3 CB1.B00 S 338,619 13% COne1lMCIlOn Co6IRCl 0800 1110 . T M S 111BB000 11188000 E 3121447 " '10438 $ 3131BB0 E 2,68855E 83% c".wdbn Adman E 802000 6 $ 419M �E' 41. S 415000 1600o $ 15,000 S 1401 BB% ConMmdw lne dron S 673000 PO 1 $ Boom!) c $ 600.000 =400 $ 500.000 $ MAW 35% C,Tfi e E 1640000 �1i4F Tki f +640.Wo `P s 1,540000 s Relmbunsbb CPeR � Ar, 1�P:' 4 )4 TOTAL $ 15,391,000 S 1)5)0,000 $ -1' aL �:: f 1].3]0000 f-'1 - S 9,3)0,000 S ],34),54) E 10.438 $ ).35),B06 E 5.138.196 B3% nlp,EW'W�W,MImN -33.11Cda1.M,,vlCh,ON m=5TNACS A.1 BIT FA5 m Fm Wv..Al 31.2M0 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Standby Power and Reliability Improvements Job No. J-33-1 AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE TIME TIME DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 06/23/1999 $ 1,290,000.00 $ 1,290,000.00 0.00 240 240 CO NO. 1' 12122/1999 $ 46,504.00 $ 1,336,504.00 3.60 6 246 CO NO. 2" 03/23/2000 $ 106,492.00 $ 1,442,996.00 11.86 10 256 CO NO. 3' 1 07/06/2000 $ 17.260.00 $ 1,460,256.00 13.20 0 256 CO NO. 4 1 07/19/2000 $ 56,978.00 1 $ 1,517,234.00 17.62 10 266 CO NO..5"1 Pending I $ 10,49.001 $ 1.527.673.06 18.42 0' 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23. "Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23. h:lwpAtalengyoba...y-33-Monstruotlon Mgmt Fi WChange Orders=5 TABLES Sheet:CO Stat Rpt. Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT V 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Five 5 Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—Job No. J-33-1 Consultant: SPEC Services Amount of this Change Order(Add) $10,439.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —Cable Bus Modifications This change order item provides labor, material and equipment to modify the structural support and wall penetration details for the cable bus. The support system originally consisted of four structural steel supports with deep foundations embedded in the ground. These supports required redesign when unforeseen underground ductbanks were discovered in this same vicinity. The supports were changed to an entirely different configuration that supports the cable bus from the building. The penetration of the bus through the existing structure also was modified due to this reconfiguration. The costs associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-J331-006 and PCH-J331-015). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,016.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—Modify Guard Posts This change order item provides labor, equipment and materials to change the type and installation detail of the guard posts shown on the plans. The guard posts were originally shown to be installed with an underground foundation. These posts required modification when unforeseen underground ductbanks were discovered in this same vicinity. These posts were changed to a surface mount post that is bolted to the concrete walkway. The costs associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-J331-010). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,573.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Five 5 Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—Job No. J-33-1 Consultant: SPEC Services ITEM 3—Fuel System Modifications This item provides labor, material and equipment to modify portions of the generator fuel system in order to meet local codes and schedule criteria. The underground storage tank (UST) required an additional visible and audible warning alarm to comply with local environmental codes. This beacon/alarm was not included in the contract.'In addition, this item contains a credit for a change in pipe grade from the specified materials to a standard pipe grade. This change affected approximately 40 feet of 1-inch fuel piping and fittings between the daytank and the generators. The costs associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a)of the General Provisions. ADDED/CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,397.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—Delete Wall Reinforcement This change order credit item deletes labor and material for a small portion of the structural wall reinforcement shown on the plans. The reinforcement steel as shown on the plans conflicted with the construction of the wall foundation. It was determined that this small portion of reinforcement steel was not needed. The costs associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-J331-003). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(250.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—Add Wall Ledger Angle This item provides labor, material and equipment to add two additional 4 foot sections of ledger angle to support the building's roof. These two sections comprise a small portion of the ledger angle shown on the project, however these sections were deemed necessary and were not shown on the contract drawings. The costs associated with this change order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference FCO-J331-003). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $362.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT V 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Five 5 Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—Job No. J-33-1 Consultant: SPEC Services ITEM 6—Modify Termination Lugs This item provides additional labor, material and equipment to connect feeder cable to the termination lugs on two of the existing Plant 2 headworks pump drive units. The Contractor was directed to terminate these connections in Change Order No. 4, Item 3, however the connections to Pumps 6 and 7 required additional work to install a second set of termination lugs to accommodate the configuration of the existing and new wires. This was not included or considered in the original change order scope of work. This work was performed by Contractor force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference FCO-J331-012). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,342.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $10,439.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT , 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 ti FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Five 5 Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—Job No. J-33-1 Consultant: SPEC Services The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that there is no time extension required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 22, 1999 Original Contract Time: 240 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 17, 2000 Contract Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 26 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 266 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 12, 2000 Projected Completion Date: December, 2000 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 1,290,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 227,234.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 10,439.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,527,673.00 Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Company C.O. No.: Five 5 Date: December 20, 2000 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements —Job No. J-33-1 Consultant: SPEC Services Board Authorization Date: December 20, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Southern Contracting Company Contractor Date XRAD0MDATA1%WP.DTA%ENGU0BS 8 CONTRACTSU-334=NSTRUCTRION MGMT FILESICHANGE ORDEMC05.DOC The FAHR minutes of the meeting held December 13, 2000 were not available for this mailing. These minutes will be distributed at the December 20, 2000 Board of Directors meeting. Once the minutes are finalized, they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd .com) . FAHR COMMITTEE ne a q wx To Bd.oroir. 17/13/oe 13/20/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numbs FMR00-91 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2000, SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) XNq Vy al AA Repmu�6 NAgsM Rep %I1 m1a(c)sac Rw ermse Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts November 30. 2000 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 11,819,117 6.5 Union Bank Checking Amount 394,142 NIA Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,418,000 5.9 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 33,879,543 6.6 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 353,087,177 5.4 Disbict 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1.723 5.8 Debt Service Reserves w/Truslees 37.670.684 6.5 Petty Cash 8.000 N/A TOTAL 5438.278.386 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC M:My.Jnpwka�ew,e A,e Rerwls 6-,d Awnea R.p.1XN 11,eoc R.ew: Nmas Page 2 ReportPrepared by Finance, 12112/POOO, 1:39 PM Monthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances $450,000,000 $200,000,00 ..... ..... ..... ..... . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Jun, 00 Jul, 00 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... . Aug, „ „ 13 El Dist GO Bond MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LNVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 1000) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $34,267,315 • Mellon $34,269,673 Historical Cost: e PIMCO $34,250,151 • Mellon $34,290,236 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.30 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $102,802 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 56% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance' Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.58 0.51 3 Months: 1.72 1.54 12 Months: 6.62 5.86 Year-to-Date: 6.11 5.41 Commentary Interest mles et the short<nd of the yield curve declined in November(three-month T-Bills down 19 basis points to 6.20%),as did longer maturities(301eer Treasuries down 18 basis points to 5.61%). The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 7 basis points in November,and outperformed by 70 basis points year-to-dale. PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-lean notes enhanced returns. H:IephelfnllMlx#IrclnwmryMPn,W(N190aC[np RPidti MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2000) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.t.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $358,605,288 • Mellon $358,118,626 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $353,988,729 • Mellon $355,971,460 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.27 Of Index: 2.28 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $8,140,340 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0•/a 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 34% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 1.14 1.15 3 Months: 2.59 2.53 12 Months: 7.91 7.34 Year-to-Date: 7.96 7.32 Commentary • Three-month yields decreased in November(90-day T-Bills down 19 basis pointy to 6.20%)as did longer maturities(5-year Treasury Notes down 38 basis points to 5.43%). • The Long-Term portfolio slightly legged Me benchmark by 1 bask point in November,but has outperformed it by 64 basis points year-to-date. • PIMCO's index duration was neutral for performance. • PIMCO's facus on higher quality see mums and an underweight allocation to carporates enhanced returns significantly w corporates underperformed the broader market. M underweight allocation to Treasuries detracted fiom returns as the Treasury sector was the best performing segment of the market. Holdings of mortgage backed securities were neutral for performanco w this sector perfommd In-One with the broader market. 1amSnNwrlig6byMU}q�alnemryA(rm,LL-Na[OtkbaRPT.he Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 1 NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE USD OCSF07511102 30-NOV-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS PAYABLES -1,722,138.84 -1,722.138.94 -5.03% 0.00 TOTAL -1,722,139.94 -1.722.138.84 -5.03% 0p0 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 5,013,311.30 5.013.311.50 14.63% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN IYR 6.603.640.56 6,603,640.56 19.27% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 5,630,623.79 5,630,623.78 16.43% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,400,832.41 6,400,832.41 18.68% 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK-LESS TH 199,641.67 199.641.67 0.58% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 8,535.35 8,535.35 0.02% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,856,585.27 23,856,585.27 69.61% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 22.134 S ,I�6..43 0.00 FIXEDFIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 370,681.06 373,672.00 1.09% 2,990.94 BANKING&FINANCE 8,265,381.30 8,272,580.15 24.14% 7,198.65 INDUSTRIAL 1,125,590.00 1,102,384.00 3.22% -23,206.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,845.00 499,170.00 1.46% 3,325.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 1,508,162.20 1,497,290.60 4.37% -10,871.60 TOTAL UNITED STATES 11,763,659.76 11,743,096.73 34.27% -20,563.01 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES S 59.76 11,745,,6%.75 Sd.39aT 7 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 390,130.21 390,130.21 1.14% 0.00 TOTAL 390,130.21 390,130 21 1.14% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 0,130.21 390,130.21 4_11. ��.bb ll-De 2000 7:34:29 Ececuf&e Wmk6euch ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-NOV-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 34,290,236.40 34,269,673.39 100.00% -20,563.01 I1-Dee-2000 7.34:29 Executive Wo,kber h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-NOV-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -3.00 -3.00 0.00% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 20.100.569.33 20.100.569.38 5.61% 0.00 PAYABLES -54.201.443.32 -54.201.445.32 -15.14% 0.00 TOTAL -34.100,878.94 -34.100.878.94 -9.52% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 48,426,811.55 48,426,811.55 13.52% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,282,204.44 1,282,204.44 0.36% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 1,090,026.67 1,090,026.67 0.30% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 277,498.46 277,498.46 0.08% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 51,076,541.12 51,076,541.12 14.26% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 16,975,662.18 16,975,6 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 12,332,197.50 12,830,890.00 3.59% 498,702.50 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 33,226,583.35 33,533,277.26 9.36% 306,693.91 U.S.AGENCIES 116,119,923.98 117,854,935.00 3291% 1,735,011.02 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 34,303,320.32 34,409,252.50 9.61% 105,932.18 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 13,893,863.45 14,012,955.43 3.91% 119,091.98 FHLMC POOLS 8,021,366.83 7,892,616.36 2.20% -IM750.47 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,846,679.01 4,770,439.11 133% -76,239.90 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 7,098.10 7,091.44 0.000A -6.66 ABS:HOME EQUITY 155,029.18 154,689.67 0.04% -339.51 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 996,070.00 0.28% -3,930.00 BANKING&FINANCE 73,68L581.41 73,315,262.94 20.53% -166,318.47 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,980,277.80 1.95% -145,911.20 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,096,090.00 8,035,690.00 2.24% -60,390.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,305,694.00 2.04% 5,694.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255-00 7,404,825.00 2.07% -92.430.00 0.0.CITY/MUNI 1,723,280.00 1,795,040.00 0.50% 71,760.00 TRANSPORTATION 2,903,436.90 2,903,436.90 0.81% 0.00 HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,709,071.50 0.48% 78,597.45 il-Dec-2000 7.38.05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-NOV-2000 FINAL LONG TERMOPER•PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS TOTAL UNITED STATES 333,864,348.08 336,111,514.91 93.85% 2,247,166.83 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 333,864,348.08 336.111,514.913s 2,247,166 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 5,031,449A8 5,031,449.69 1.40% 0.00 TOTAL 5,031,449.68 5,031,449.69 1.40% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,031,449.68 1.40% 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 355,871,459.94 358,118,626.77 100.00% 2,247,166.93 ll-Deo2000 7.38::05 Executive Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF03511102 2000/11/30 RUN DATE 2 12/06/00 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE : 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH S CASH EQUIVALENTS 8,535.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NOW .000 6.325 AAA 100.000 81535.35 .03 996085247 AAA 8,535.35 .02 6,800,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 6.293 .000 P-1 9'l.112 6,603,640.56 22.68 912395GC9 04/19/2001 DO 10/19/00 A-13 6,603,640.56 18.55 200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BK CONS SYSTEM 6.462 .000 P-1 99.821 159,641.67 .83 3133121169 MAT 12/01/2000 A-19 199,641.61 .56 673,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MTG ASSN DISC NT 6.464 .000 P-1 99.004 666,299.91 2.79 31358SS40 HAT 12/07/2000 A-1+ 666,299.91 1.87 2,300,000.00 FEOERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DISC 6.506 .000 P-1 99.140 2,280,220.00 9.55 313397AJO MAT 01/09/2001 A-1♦ 2,280,220.00 6.40 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MTG ASSN DISC HER 6.524 .000 P-1 98.871 5,734,532.50 24.03 313589AD5 MAT O1/04/2001 A-I+ 5,734,532.50 16.11 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP DISC 6.541 .000 P-1 99.462 2,264,615.18 9.49 313397BH3 MAT 02/01/2001 A-1♦ 2,264,615.38 6.36 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LN MTG CO" DISC 6.545 .000 P-1 98.708 1,085,788.00 4.55 313397AL5 MAT 01/11/2001 A-1♦ 1,005,788.00 3.05 900,000.00 VENISON GLOBL FOG DISC 6.568 .000 98.508 806,574.75 3.21 92344AMC0 12/12/2000 886,574.75 2.49 600,000.00 GMAC DISC 6.640 .000 P-1 98.941 593,649.00 2.48 37042DNJB O1/18/2001 593,649.00 1.67 900,D00.0D HEINE H J CO DISC 6.642 .000 P-1 97.869 880,825.00 3.69 42307 JNN6 01/22/2001 880,825.00 2.47 900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 6.645 .000 P-1 98.419 885,775.50 3.31 62008APP0 02/23/2001 885,135.50 2.49 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.663 .000 P-1 98.308 884,771.25 3.70 36959HNK9 01/19/2001 884,771.25 2.41 900,000.00 DAINLERCHRYSLER DISC 6.665 .000 93.968 881,716.00 3.69 233BEONX0 01/31/2DO1 881,716.00 2.48 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSF07511102 2000/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/00 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.434 .004 23,856,585.29 100.00 23,856,585.27 63.01 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 6.223 5.819 A2 99.667 498,260.00 4.24 37042MTO S.800B 04/09/2001 DO 04/08/98 A 498,335.00 1.40 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP NTS 6.425 9.625 A2 100.000 922,860.00 2.66 300442AHO 9.625E 1Z/01/2D00 DO 12/01/9D A 900,000.00 2.53 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN 6TR 00016 6.569 6.628 Al 100.187 500,268.50 4.26 44922YAR9 6.640% 10129/2D01 DO 10/29/99 A+ 500,935.00 1.41 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORD DEBS 6.526 6.437 AM 100.04I 99,892.00 .85 3134AOSP3 6.440% 08/21/2001 DO 08/21/96 AM 100,047.00 .28 500,000.00 GTE CORD DEB 6.669 9.375 A2 100.000 512,080.00 4.25 362320AQ6 9.395% 12/01/2000 A6 500,000.00 1.40 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 6.830 6.997 Al 100.187 700,707.00 5.97 00206HL44 0.000% 08/15/2001 DO 08/20/99 AI 701,309.00 1.93 440,000.00 FORD MTN CO DEL 6.844 8.847 A2 I01.733 448,219.2D 3.81 345330AY6 9.000% 09/15/2001 DD 09/15/91 A 447,625.20 1.26 1,002,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR HIS 6.945 6.154 A3 99.530 996,082.20 8.49 98155KAF9 6.125% 08/15/2001 DD 08/11/98 A- 997,290.60 2.80 1,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP MTN 6.852 6.161 A3 99.420 993,340.00 0.46 89350LRS4 6.125% 11/01/2001 DD 11/04/98 A- 994,200.00 2J79 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN 4 SR 00010 6.962 5.640 Al 99.731 173,383.00 1.48 12560QMS 5.625% 02/02/2001 DD 02/02/96 Aa 174,529.25 .49 500,000.00 USE UTILS INC MTN IM 00006 6.899 6.180 A3 99.834 495,845.00 4.25 902699AF6 6.17D4 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/98 A- 499,170.00 1.40 280,000.DO HEILER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.943 5.095 A3 99.222 197,972.00 1.68 42333HKJ0 5.75D8 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 A- 198,444.00 .56 200,000.00 BURLINGTON MEN INC NT 6.960 8.400 A3 101.192 202,730.00 1.72 122014AD5 8.500% 10/01/2001 DO 10/17/91 A- 202,384.00 .57 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE [ 3 OCBF07511102 2000/11/30 RUN DATE [ 12/06/00 DISTRICT[ LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM t 09.20.12 v................................vv......................................ue...................................000.... PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARKST VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ..-------- 250,000.00 CHASE NANNATTAN CORD NEW SUB 6.984 9.255 Al 101.296 254,730.00 2.15 16161ABL1 9.3751 07/01/2001 DO 07/01/99 A 253,240.00 .71 275,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN SK CONS BOB 7.059 5.166 AAA 99.500 270,799.06 2.32 3133KSEA2 5.140% 05/02/2001 DO 11/02/98 AAA 273,625.00 .77 500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORD NTN 100001 7.316 6.762 A3 99.820 496,495.00 4.24 06670QDJ4 6.750% 08/09/2001 OD 06/09/96 BBB- 499,100.00 1.40 1,000,000.00 ARISTAR INC SR AT 7.346 7.747 A3 100.041 1,003,830.00 0.51 040420ATS 7.750% 06/15/2001 DO 07/07/94 A- 1,000,410.00 2.81 1,000,000.00 FLEETMORSTAR FINL GROUP INC 7.365 9.762 A3 101.415 1,024,020.00 8.63 33901BADS 9.900% 06/15/2001 DO 06/24/91 A- 1,014,150.00 2.85 575,000.00 FCC NAIL BR DE NTN 1 TR 00284 7.426 6.382 ART 99.890 570,262.00 4.89 30241NW4 6.3751 03/15/2001 DO 03/14/96 AA- 574,367.50 1.61 420,000.00 JUUKAMERICA CORP SR AT 7.442 6.656 RA2 99.9D6 417,034.80 3.57 066050CJ2 6.650% 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/96 A- 419,605.20 1.18 1,000,000.00 DONALDSON LUFRIN 6 JEN TR000ll 7.530 6.133 Al 99.633 987,060.00 0.40 25766CMO 6.1101 05/15/2001 DO 05/27/98 A- 996,330.00 2.80 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6.771 7.371 11,765,659.76 100.00 11,745,096.75 32.99 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 6.558 2.716 35,622,245.03 100.00 35,601,682.02 100.00 ................ --------- YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 4 OCSF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/00 DISTRICTa LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIER 09.28.12 PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT NOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________-- CASE 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 277,498.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE MGMT .000 6.325 AAA 100.000 277,498.46 .64 996085247 AAA 277,498.46 .07 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DISC HT 6.459 .000 P-1 99.093 1,090,026.67 2.13 313SB8948 MAT 12/07/2000 A-1a 1,090,026.67 .28 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL MOVE LN RTC CORD DISC 6.489 .000 P-1 90.631 1,282,204.44 2.51 31339GU27 RAT 12/21/2000 A-la 1,202,204.44 .33 5,700,000.00 CARPBELL SCUP CO DISC 6.564 .000 P-1 98.562 5,619,046.67 10.99 13443AM77 12/07/2000 5,618,046.67 1.45 1,000,000.00 VERISON GLOBL P00 DISC 6.568 .000 98.509 985,083.06 1.92 92344ANCO 12/12/2000 985,083.06 .25 12,300,000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 6.576 .000 98.241 11,101,283.22 21.73 43851RMP4 12/15/2000 11,101,283.22 2.07 7,600,000.00 NINNSTA MNG 6 MG DISC 6.579 .000 P-1 98.488 7,405,088.00 14.65 60406ARK4 12/19/2000 7,485,088.00 1.93 7,100,000.00 ANERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 6.603 .000 P-1 98.447 6,999,752.78 13.68 0301SAR00 12/13/2000 6,989,752.78 1.81 1,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 6.622 .000 P-1 98.603 1,163,239.67 2.31 37042DNE2 01/17/2001 1,193,239.67 .32 800,000.00 DAINLEMMYSLER DISC 6.629 .000 98.210 705,670.00 1.53 2338BONL7 12/20/2000 785,679.00 .20 6,200,ODO.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.638 .000 P-1 98.367 6,050,785.00 11.94 36959BRAI 01/10/2001 6,090,795.00 1.58 1,000,000.0E GMAC DISC 6.639 .000 P-1 98.816 958,155.56 1.93 37042DN02 01/24/2001 988,155.56 .26 1,900,000.00 DU POET DE RENDER DISC 6.646 .000 P-1 97.957 1,861,175.09 3.64 26354AR6S 12/06/2000 1,861,175.09 •48 3,400,000.00 ABSCCIATES CP NA DISC 6.654 .000 P-1 98.741 3,357,185.50 6.57 04600JNJ9 01/16/2001 3,357,105.50 .87 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.656 .000 P-1 98.704 1,085r746.25 2.12 07588RNX9 01/31/2001 1,085,746.75 .28 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 8.117 .000 98.622 887,592.25 1.73 233SEONXD 01/31/2001 887,592.25 .23 ________ _______ _________________ ________- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.520 .061 51,076,541.12 100.00 51,076,541.12 13.20 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 291,250.35 FHLMC GROUP 418-6064 .000 6.454 AAA 98.609 274,394.89 .08 313488N83 6.394% 01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA 279,338.16 .07 1,225,492.34 OHM II POOL #0080395 .000 6.471 AAA 100.453 1,214,386.31 .36 36225CNM4 6.5001 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 1,231,043.02 .32 9,858,143.92 GNMA II POOL 4080408X .000 6.471 AAA 100.453 9,750,022.15 2.94 36225CR28 6.500E 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 9,902,801.31 2.56 8,091,837.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEK HE 3.315 3.623 AAA IDO.062 8,862,417.19 2.64 9128273AR 3.625% O7/15/2002 DO 0)/15/97 AAA 8,897,349.94 2.30 25,210,990.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.919 3.454 ARA 97.719 24,364,166.16 7.32 9328272N3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AM 24,635,927.32 6.36 1,994,350.00 SALOMON SHIM BARNEY HLDGS IMF 4.905 3.699 AA3 90.948 1,860,449.21 .55 79549BBG1 3.650% 02/14/2002 DO 02/14/97 A 1,874,421.44 .48 3,030,000.00 FORT AUTH MY 6 NJ 5.649 5.609 AAA 95.823 2,903,436.90 .86 733581YS5 5.375% 10/15/2035 DO 10/15/00 AAA 2,103,436.90 .75 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.150 6.523 RAE 99.645 1,543,213.00 .44 0460D3HY8 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 Aa 1,494,675.00 .39 3,950,000.00 SHAG NTS 5.752 6.911 A2 99.246 3,918,768.50 1.16 3I0425W5 ELM AT 08/18/2003 DO 00/17/98 A 3,920,217.00 1.01 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 S.795 A3 99.222 999,730.00 .29 4233381J0 5.7508 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 992,220.00 .26 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIRA MEN SR 400570 5.775 6.899 A2 100.143 999,188.90 .29 44181KST4 ELTG RE O8/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,001,430.00 .26 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/00 DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,0OS,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HIM 5.804 6.596 A3 99.156 2,060,739.00 .59 91240OGW6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,968,077.00 .51 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 5.849 6.630 A3 100.000 3,073,170.00 .89 B1240OJAI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,000,000.00 .77 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR US" 9F MTO 5.861 6.665 AAA 97.531 14,121,953.13 4.20 OIN062615 6.500% O1/15/2030 AAA 14,141,995.00 3.65 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORD GLOBAL HT 5.881 6.850 Al 99.544 1,992,800.00 .59 066365DN4 FLED AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/90 A- 1,990,880.00 .51 113,161.50 PHLMC MULTICL HER P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.919 99.687 113,002.31 .03 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 112,907.30 .D3 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY SITE CARE BER 8 5.942 5.406 AAA 87.070 1,630,474.05 .50 64579ERMO 4.750% 07/01/2028 DO 12/01/90 AAA 1,709,071.50 .44 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MID ASSN MEN 5.981 5.839 AAA 99.672 14,955,300.00 4.44 3136492V0 5.9201 07/19/2001 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,950,800.00 3.06 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.388 AA 99.793 2,526,725.00 .74 590188KP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 AA- 2,494,825.00 .64 2,000,000.00 MONTM.OMERY ALA BMC SER A 6.001 5.571 AAA 89.752 1,723,280.00 .53 613041GH9 5.000% 11/15/2029 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,795,040.00 .46 7,500,000.00 BELL80UTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.077 AA2 90.731 7,497,255.00 2.20 079867AK5 6.0001 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 AAA 7,404,825.00 1.91 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LN HIS CORP DBMS 6.062 6.020 AAA 99.675 12,495,625.00 3.70 3134A33MI 6.0001 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/99 AAA 12,459,375.00 3.22 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNRA SF MTG 6.096 6.291 AAA 95.315 5,932,627.19 1.77 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2030 AAA 5,960,937.50 1.54 2,000,000.00 BAMKBOSTON CORD SR NTS 6.133 6.169 A2 99.293 1,999,600.00 .59 0660STAL6 6.125E 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,985,860.00 .51 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.479 AAA 135.062 12,332,197.50 3.01 912810EG9 00.750% 08/15/2020 OD 00/15/90 AAA 12,830,090.00 3.31 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MEN 4TR00615 6.154 6.756 Al 100.062 1,499,415.00 .44 17120ORSO MIS RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/00/98 Ai 1,500,930.00 .39 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I OCSF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE t 12/06/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 09.29.12 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY ME ITR 00311 6.100 7.649 AA3 100.125 1,699,517.20 .50 6104SENY3 ELIO AT 01/28/2002 DO 01/27/00 RA- 1,702,125.00 .44 7,099.11 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.206 AAA 99.906 7,090.10 .00 31677BAM 6.20DB 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 7,091.44 .00 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN ITS 00004 6.201 6.224 A3 99.607 1,000,000.00 .29 73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BOB. 996,070.00 .26 2,000,000.00 FORD HER CA CO TEAM ENHANCED 6.221 6.213 A2 99.953 1,998,613.60 .59 345397BC6 FLTG AT 09/27/2006 DO 09/23/9B A 1,999,060.00 .52 3,ODO,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DENS 6.271 6.102 Al 95.992 2,994,300.00 .89 209Ll ICVS FLTG RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 2,999,760.00 .30 155,029.16 GREEN TREE CORP 99-0 CL A-1 6.290 6.304 AAA 99.331 155,029.19 .04 3935052Y3 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 154,689.60 .04 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MW ASSN MTN 6.291 6.228 AAA 100.031 4,488,705.00 1.33 31364CKV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,501,395.00 1.16 3,000,000.00 HELLER FIEL HER 6TR 00246 6.300 6.333 Al 99.484 3,000,000.00 .66 423333LP7 FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,994,520.00 .13 3,800,000.00 GENERAL HIRE ACCEP ITR 00562 6.303 6.272 A2 99.396 3,793,958.00 1.12 37042HEKD MID RT 02/24/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3,792,248.00 .99 2,729,003.18 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.997 AAA 93.395 2,732,790.64 .39 3133WE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 AAA 2,650,691.81 .69 2,410,029.37 GNMA DID REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 6.295 AAA 100.391 2,410,029.37 .31 3930B4NK9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,419,452.56 .62 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.198 A2 99.583 2,031,960.00 .59 073902ARI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 11991,660.00 .51 3,000,000.00 FORD MEN CR DO GLOBAL LANDMARK 4.350 6.996 A2 99.593 3,000,000.00 .90 345397SRS FLTG AT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,987,790.00 .37 2,000,000.00 FORD HER CA CO GLOBAL HIS 6.351 6.873 A2 99.593 1,992,500.00 .59 345397079 FLTG AT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,991,060.00 .51 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN BE CONS BOB 6.404 6.756 AAA 101.766 29,443,671.00 8.01 3133MBY84 6.8751 00/15/2003 DO 06/07/00 AAA 29,613,906.00 0.65 YLOMM YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 8 OCBF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE + 12/06/00 DISMICTt LONG-TERA OPERATING RUN TIME + 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _____-_--- 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTH 6.440 6.493 A2 99.196 4,000,000.00 1.18 44181ESA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 A 3,967,440.00 1.02 2,000,000.00 PNLRC RULTICLASS CTP III AS 6,496 6.503 AAA 99.947 2,000,890.00 .59 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2028 AAA 1,998,940.00 .52 2,500,609.06 FHLNC RULTICLAS6 CTF SER 1620E 6.504 6.968 AAA 86.104 2,352,469.92 .64 3I33TI3A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 2,160,013.43 .56 2,000,000.00 HILLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 6.507 7.029 A3 100.046 2,000,000.00 .59 423320WS FLTG RT O6/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,000,920.00 .52 5,000,000.00 SALONON SO WAGS MIN 6.625 6.967 M3 99.937 5,000,000.00 1.48 7954DEBER TIM AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 A 4,996,850.00 1.29 7,627,787.01 FHLNC GROUP 9G5-0416 6.628 7.011 AM 99.636 7,746,971.94 2.26 3120DWSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/90 AAA 7,615,279.20 1.97 2,300,000.00 LENHAN BRCS HIM ME TR 00333 6.672 7.676 A2 100.522 2,322,379.00 .68 52511PPW5 FLTG RT 04/01/2002 DO 03/29/99 A 2,311,116.00 .60 5,000,000.00 LERHM INCH SLOSH NTH 6.674 7.312 A2 100.515 5,000,000.00 1.49 52511PUQ1 MIS AT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A 5,025,750.00 1.30 1,662,724.17 GEM II POOL 0080088M 6.705 6.351 AAA 100.375 1,699,096.27 .49 36225CC20 VAR. RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 1,668,959.39 .43 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN RIG CORP DEBS 6.711 6.372 MA 99.875 30,323,015.00 3.09 3134A3MO 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/01/99 AAA 10,381,075.00 2.68 2,000,000.00 MEAN 6 NCLERNAN C0S INC SR NT 6.717 6.651 A2 99.610 1,992,200.00 .59 51114BAB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 00 06/14/99 M- 1,992,200.00 .51 3,000,000.00 FORD HTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.762 A2 99.011 2,995,080.00 .88 3453916J3 6.7001 07/16/2004 DO O7/16/99 A 2,972,310.00 .11 900,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN BR CONS BD9 6.111 - 6.711 MA 100.570 999,550.00 .26 3133NRO I 6.750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AM 905,202.00 .23 5,450,000.00 CIT GAP INC NTN ISR 00042 6.910 6.813 Al 99.993 5,450,000.00 1.62 1256OPST1 MW RT 09/13/2002 DO 09/01/00 A. 5,441,438.50 1.41 2,500,D00.00 COUNTRYWIDE HONE LEE INC NT 6.066 6.935 A3 90.111 2,498,400.00 .73 22237UMB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,469,275.00 .64 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 MSP07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/00 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE t 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT NODDY RABBET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 7,300,000.00 ONEOX INC NEW HT 6.960 7.405 A2 100.078 7,300o OOO.0O 2.13 682680AG2 PLTO AT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,305,694.00 1.99 1,202,443.25 GNNA II POOL #0060023 6.992 7.060 AAA 100.641 1,222,350.72 .36 36225CA09 7.1251 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,210,150.91 .32 1,000,000.00 GNNA GTD REHIC TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 6.977 AAA 100.320 1,996,875.00 .59 3837E3C70 7.000% 12/20/2022 AAA 2,006,560.00 .52 7,000,000.00 OLD SENT OR WIN SO OOOD1 7.084 7.532 A2 99.681 7,000,000.00 2.00 67982XRA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DD 04/20/00 A- 6,970,090.00 1.90 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL RIG ROSS DEB$ 7.113 6.547 AAA 101.187 2,030,133.00 .63 31359M6Y5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,124,927.00 .55 2,000,000.00 TANG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 3.512 8.378 SAA3 97.811 2,151,250.00 .58 542691CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 A- 1,957,420.00 .51 1,304,548.42 GREYSTONE BVCNG COMP PNA 195-7 7.564 7.601 AM 92.750 1,285,409.70 .37 396101AE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 1,275,196.08 .33 1,000,000.00 FORD ROTOR CR CO NT 7.562 6.263 A2 98.290 965,170.00 .29 345397GV9 6.750E 05/15/2005 A 982,900.00 .25 971,705.13 WWIHUNT00N PAIGE 1000-11150 7.684 9.669 AAA 92.828 950,600.91 .20 302998GR3 2.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 950,600.91 .25 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD NTH 1TR 00115 7.709 7.114 A2 102.617 2,950,530.00 .91 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,070,510.00 .00 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ROSS NEW 7.724 6.709 AAA 96.891 32,490,400.00 10.14 31364GYG2 6.500% 03/22/2009 DO 03/12/99 AAA 34,105,632.00 0.01 14,000,000.00 COHMIT TO FUR IBM BF MG 7.794 3.029 AAA 102.180 14,248,750.00 4.25 OINOB06C3 6.0001 12/15/2030 AAA 14,306,320.00 3.69 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CO" SR NT 7.967 7.600 Al 103.612 1,594,032.00 .49 020002AL5 7.8754 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A4 1,657,792.00 .43 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INDOOR SECURITIES 5.318 S.BB1 333,864,348.08 100.00 336,111,514.91 86.79 YDDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 10 MBF07522202 2000/11/30 RUN DATE , 12/06/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE , 09.28.12 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARAET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _______________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ ________ _______ ----------------- _________ TOTAL 5.364 5.657 304,940,089.20 100.00 307,188,056.03 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NO V-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES OC'T 06-Nov-2000 .5.10 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Nov-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES OCT 06-Nov-2000 -11.05 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Nov-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,965.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2000 -13,965.00 996085247 01-Nov-2000 13,965.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,965.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2000 -13,965.00 996085247 01-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 01-Nov-2000 -1,183,239.67 37042DNI42 01/17/2001 01-Nov-2000 1,183,239.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40:05 5wmt wfW e Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 Ol-NO V-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 01-Nov-2000 -1,193,239,67 37042DNH2 01/17/2001 01-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,016.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2000 -2,016.60 996085247 02-Nov-2000 2,016.60 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,016.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2000 -2,016.60 996085247 02-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 02-Nov-2000 5,734,532.50 313589AD5 MAT01/042001 02-Nov-2000 5,734,532.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 02-Nov-2000 -5,734,532.50 313589AD5 MATOIM42001 02-Nov-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,667.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-2000 -6,667.63 996085247 03-Nov-2000 6,667.63 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,667.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Nov-2000 -6,667.63 996085247 03-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 03-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Exe .M4 Wwkbe kh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rude: '3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOL1D47'LD SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,384.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Nov-2000 -35,384.22 996085247 07-Nov-2000 35,384.22 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,384.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Nov-2000 -35,384.22 996095247 07-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 07-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Nov-2000 -2,264,615.78 313397RI43 MAT 02/01/2001 07-Nov.2000 2,264,615.78 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Nov-2000 -2,264,615.78 313397BH3 MAT 02/01/2001 07-Nov-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 10-Nov-2000 -2,997,308.33 90328ALF8 11/15/200D 10-Nov-2000 2,997,308.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 10-Nov-2000 -2,997,309.33 90328ALF8 11/15/2000 10-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 ASSOCIATES CP NA DISC 10-Nov-2000 -3,337,185.50 04600JNJ9 01/19/2001 10-Nov-2000 3,357,185.50 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 Il.Deo-1000 7:40:05 eeeculiw Wwkbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NO V-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 ASSOCIATES CP NA DISC 10-Nov-2000 -3,357,185.50 046003N39 01/18/2001 10-Nov-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOS'I'ON C 10-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,858.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2000 -69,958.49 996095247 13-Nov-2000 69,83BA9 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,838.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2000 .69,858.49 996085247 13-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 13-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 66,424.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 14-Nov-2000 -66,424.00 996087094 14-Nov-2000 66.424.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,093,475.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I5-Nov-2000 -1,093,475.00 996085247 15-Nov-2000 1,093,475.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,093,475.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2000 -1,093,475.00 996085247 15-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 577,344.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2000 -577,344.98 996085247 15-Nov-2000 577,344.99 B 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7.40.05 Evemllw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NO V-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 577,344.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2000 -577,344.98 996085247 15-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,771.33 DREYFUS TREASURY C.ASI I MGM r 16-Nor-2000 -53,771.33 996095247 16-Nov-2000 53,771.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,771.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2000 -53.771.33 996085247 16-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 16-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Nov-2000 -1,200,000.00 9937SK047 06.490%11/17/2000 DO 11/161 16-Nov-2000 1,200,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Nov-2000 -1,200,000.00 99375KO47 06.490%11/17/2000 DO 11/16/ 16-Nov-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 204,154.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-2000 -204,154.11 996085247 17-Nov-2000 204,154.11 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 204,154.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Nov-2000 -204,154.11 996085247 17-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 17-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-1000 7.40:05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l0000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMIPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG"FERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 GMAC DISC 20-Nov-2000 -998,155.56 37042DNQ2 01/24/2001 20-Nov-2000 998,155.56 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 GMAC DISC 20-Nov-2000 -998,155.56 37042DNQ2 01242001 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 GMAC DISC 21-Nov-2000 -593,649.00 37042DNJ8 01/I82001 21-Nav-2000 593,649.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.0D LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 GMAC DISC 21-Nov-2000 -593,649.00 37042DNJ8 01/182001 21-Nov-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 21-Nov-2000 -1,085,746.75 07588RNX9 01/312001 21-Nov-2000 1,085,746.75 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 21-Nov-2000 -1,085,746.75 07588RNX9 01/312001 21-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 21-Nov-2000 -199,641.67 313312R69 MAT 12/012000 21-Nov-2000 199,641.67 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 I1-Dee-2000 7:40.05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000/0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR DK CONS SYST 21-Nov-2000 -199,641.67 313312R69 MAT 12/01/2000 21-Nov-2000 0.00 FC CREDITSUISSE FIRSTBOSIDN C 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2000 -2,300,000.00 996085247 22-Nov-2000 2,300,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2000 -2,300.000.00 996085247 22-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 22-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DI 22-Nov-2000 -2,280,220.00 313397AJO MAT01/09/2001 22-Nov-2000 2,280,220.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERALN HOME LN MTG ASSN DI 22-Nov-2000 -2,280,220.00 313397AJO MAT01/09/2001 22-Nov-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 22-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,733.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Nov-2000 -44,733.33 996095247 27-Nov-2000 44,733.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,733.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Nov-2000 .44,733.33 996085247 27-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 27-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Den-2000 7:40:05 Ewc lim Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-NO V-2000 -30-NO V-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMC'O 10,016.61 BSDT-LATF.MONEY DEPOSIT ACC V 27-Nov-2000 -10,016.61 996087094 27-Nov-2000 10,016.61 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,016.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2000 -10.016.61 996085247 28-Nov-2000 10,016.61 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10.016.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2000 -10,016.61 9%085247 28-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 28-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 14,224.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2000 .14,224.50 9%085247 28-Nov-2000 14,224.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 14,224.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Nov-2000 -14.224.50 996085247 28-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 28-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 28-Nov-2000 -885,775.50 62008APPS 02/23/2001 28-Nov-2000 985,775.50 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED[NCO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 28-Nov-2000 -895,773.50 62008APP8 02123/20DI 28-Nov-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 28-Nov-2000 0.00 /I-Deo-2000 7:40:05 Encuffn Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 DAIMLCRCHRYSLER DISC 30-Nm-2000 -593,180.00 233BEONXO 01/312001 30-Nov-2000 593,180.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 30-Nov-2000 -593,180.00 233BEONXO 01/312001 30-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 30-Nov-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I&Oc1.2000 -2.035.000.00 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/152030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oc14000 5,873,046.88 OIN0606B7 6.000%11/152028 20-Nov-2000 -5,873,046.88 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oc1-2000 12,210,000.00 011,10806115 8.000% 11/152030 20-Nov-2000 -12,210,000.00 BC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Od-2000 -3,372,031.25 OIN0626B3 6,500%11/012029 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 16.Oc1.2000 -10,594,375.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/012029 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7.40:05 Execul/w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oc1-2000 -12,210.000.00 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 12,210,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-OV-2000 .12,210,000.00 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oc1.2000 .5,873,046.88 OIN0606B7 6.000% 11/15/2030 20-Nov2000 5,973,046.88 E GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,25000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oc1.2000 .5,873,046.88 011,10606117 6.000%11/1512030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,030,000.00 PORT AUTH NY&NJ 06-Nov-2000 -2,903,436.90 733581YS5 5.375% 10/15/2035 DO 1011510 15-Nov-2000 2,903,436,90 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,030,000.00 PORT AUTH NY&NJ D6-Nov-2000 .13,571.88 733581YS5 5.375%10/15/2035 DD 10/15/0 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,030,000.00 PORT AUTH NY&NJ 06-Nov.2000 -2,917,009.79 733581YS5 5.375% 10/15/2035 DD 10/15/0 15-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 15-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dcc-2000 7:40.05 EveeuOve Wmkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsGGooa0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NO V-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MI G 10-Nov-2000 -10,611,362.50 OIN0626CI 6.500% 12/15/2030 20-Dec-2000 10,611,562.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-Nov-2000 -3,376,406.25 OIN0626CI 6.500% 12/15/2030 20-De 2000 3,376,406.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT'I'O PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Nav-2000 -12,210,000.00 OIN08060 8.000%12/132030 20-Dec-2000 12,210,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP MTN I4-Nov-2000 -993,340.00 89350LHS4 6.125%11/01/2001 DO 11104/9 17-Nov-2000 993,340.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP MTN 14-Nov-2000 -2,722.22 8935OLHS4 6.125%11/0112001 DO 11/0419 17-Nov-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO I,000,000.00 TRANSAMERICA FIN CORP hM 14-Nov-2000 -996,062.22 8935OLHS4 6.I25%11/01/2001 DD II/04/9 17-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 17-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPF.R-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MIO 15-Nov-2000 -5,910,156.25 OIN0606C5 6.000%12/15/2030 20-Dec-2000 5,910,156.25 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 1I-D4e-2000 7:40:05 Execulive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PINICO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF hl'I'G 16-Nov-2000 -2,038,750.00 OIN0806C3 8.000%12/15/2030 20-Dec-2000 2,038,750.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP M'IN 20-Nov-2000 -700,707.00 00206HL44 7.000%08/152001 DO 0820/9 01-Dec-2000 70%707.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 AT&T CAPITAL CORP MTN 20-Nov-2000 -14,427.78 00206HL44 7.000%O9/152001 DO 0820/9 01-Dec-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 28-Nov-2000 -99,892.00 3134A05P3 6.440%08212001 DO 0821/9 29-Nov-2000 99,892.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG COPP DEB 28-Nov-2000 -1,753.11 3134A05P3 6.440°%08/212001 DO 08/21/9 29-Nov-2000 0.00 113 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN M3'G CORP DEB 28-Nov-2000 -101,645.11 3134A05P3 6.440%0821/2001 DO 0821/9 29-Nov-2000 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 29-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF RITG 29-Nov-2000 -5,932,617.19 OIN060619 6.000%011152030 23Jen-2001 5,932,617.19 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 1I-Dec-2000 7.40:05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NO V-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF PTTG 29-Nov-2000 -10,704,804.69 OIN062615 6.500%01/152030 23-Ian-2001 10,704,804.69 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MTN 8TR 00016 30-Nov-2000 -500,268.50 44922YAR9 6.6401/. 10292001 DO 10/2919 05-Dec-2000 500,268.50 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 IBM CR CORP MT 4 8TR 00016 30-Nov-2000 .3,320.00 44922YAR9 6.640%1029/2001 DO 10/29/9 05-Dec-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 30-Nov-2000 498,260.00 37042WRTO 5.800%04/09/2001 DD 04/08/9 05-Dec-2000 498,260.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GMAC MTN 000378 30-Nov-2000 -5.155.56 37042WR-M 5.800%04/092001 DO 04/0819 05-Dec-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMTTTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 30-Nov-2000 -3,417,148A4 OIN062615 6.500%01/152030 23-Jan-2001 3,417,148.44 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 11-Dx-2000 7:40:05 Executive Workbench Q FE- OR\NGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 140,760.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -140,760.00 9128212M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-Jul-2000 140,760.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 140,760.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 ,140,760.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/ 15-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,695.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -49,695.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-2000 49,695.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,693.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 49,695.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 15-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,587.60 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Aug-2000 .10,587.60 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Aug-2000 10,587.60 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,597.60 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Aug-2000 -10,587.60 79549BBGI 3.650%02/14/2002 DO 02/14/ 14-Aug-2000 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15.Oct-2000 -3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 IS-Oct-2000 3.50 PU 0.00 1/-Deo2000 7:40:05 Ex .dw Wmkbex6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: IS PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER _ COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 I'HLMC MUUI'ICLASS C'IT E3 A 15-Oa-2000 -3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15.Oc1.2000 0.00 PC 15•Nov2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,480.60 FHLMCMULTICLASSCTFSER 162 01-Nov2000 •IZ480.60 3133T17A4 6.000%11/1512023 DD 1WIN 01-Nov2000 12,490.60 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,480.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SD•R 162 01-Nov-2000 •12,480.60 3133T17A4 6,000% 1 111 5/2 0 2 3 DD 1110119 01-Nov2000 D.DD PC 16•Nov-2000 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,231.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov2000 169,231.16 996095247 01-Nov-2000 -169,231.16 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -169,231.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2000 169,231.16 996083247 01-Nov2000 0.00 FC 01-Nov2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER•PIMCO -126,902.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2000 126,802.82 996085247 02-Nov-2000 •126,802.82 S 0.00 ll-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Erecullw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -126,802.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CAST I MGRIT 02-Nov-2000 126.802.82 996085247 02-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2000 11.05 996085247 06-Nov-2000 -11.05 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06.Nov-2000 5.10 9%085247 06-Nov-2000 -3.10 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2000 5.10 996085247 06-Nov-200D 0.00 FC 06-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2000 11.05 996095247 06-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 06-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,493.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Nov-2000 54,493.93 996085247 10-Nov-2000 -54,493.83 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,493.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Nov-2000 54,493.93 996085247 10-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 10-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Evec.tweX ki,, cM Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER CO6IPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PMICO 66,424.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCI' 15-Nov-2000 66,424.00 996087094 15-Nov-2000 -66,424.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,200,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASII MGMT 16-Nov-2000 1,200,000.00 9196085247 16-Nov-2000 .1,200.000.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Nov-2000 I,200,000.00 996095247 16-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 16-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Nov-2000 1,200,000.00 99375KO47 06.490°.E 1 111 72 0 0 0DD 11/16/ 17-Nov-2000 -11200,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,200.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Nov-2000 216.33 99375KO47 06,490%11/17/2000 DO 11/161 17-Nov-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Nov-2000 1,200,216.33 99375KO47 06.490%11/17/2000 DO 11/16/ 17-Nov-2000 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 636,191.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Nov-2000 636,191.97 996085247 20-Nov-2000 63C191.87 S 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Etecullve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -636,191.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASI I MGMT 20-Nov-2000 63CI91.87 996085247 20-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -193,290.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2000 193,290.67 9%085247 21-Nov-2000 -193,290.67 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -193,290.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2000 193,290.67 996085247 21-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,767.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2000 69,767.57 996085247 21-No,2000 -68,767.37 S 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -68,767.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2000 68,767.57 996085247 21-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,280,220.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Nov-2000 2,280,220.00 996085247 24-Nov-2000 -2,280,220.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,280,220.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Nov-2000 2,280,220.00 996085247 24-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 24-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40.05 Execufive0orkbenc5 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-l'IMCO -10.016.61 RSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACC"I 28.Nov-2000 10,016.61 996097094 28-Nov-2000 -10,016.61 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -101,645.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2000 101.645.11 996085247 29-Nov-2000 -101,645.11 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -101,645.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2000 101.645.11 996085247 29-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 29-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -93,166.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2000 91166.52 996085247 30-Nov-2000 -93,166.52 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -93,166.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Nov-2000 93,166.52 996095247 30-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 30-Nov-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 10-Nov-2000 10,615,000.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 -10,595,204.74 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 19,795.26 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 10-Nov-2000 10,615,000.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 20-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40.05 Executive Workbench Q - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPCR.PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MI'G 10-Nov-2000 3,377,500.00 OIN0626B3 6.50091. 11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 -3,371,201.51 S MERRILL LYNCI I PIERCE.FENNER 6,298.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTO 10-Nov-2000 3,377,500.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2000 12,220,312.50 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 -12,210,000.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 10,312.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2000 12,220,312.50 OIN080665 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Nov-2000 5,910,40OA0 OIN0606D7 6.000%11/152030 20-Nov-2000 -5,873,046.88 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 37,353.52 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Nov-2000 5,910,400.40 OIN0606B7 6,000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SP AITG 16-Nov-2000 2,040,312.50 0IN0806B5 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 -2,035,000.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 5,312.50 11-Dm-2000 7.40.05 Emculim Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 7l PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER _- COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Nov-2000 2,040,312.50 OI1,10806115 8.000%11/15/2030 20-Nov-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-Nav-2000 5,931,640.63 OIN0606C5 6.000%12/15/2030 20.Dec-2000 .5,910,156.25 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 21,484.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-Nov-2000 10,704,375.00 OIN0626CI 6.500%17JI5/2030 20.Dcc-2000 -10,611,562.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 92.812.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MM 30-Nov-2000 3,416,873.00 OIM626CI 6.500%12/15/2030 20-Dee-2000 -3,376,406.25 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 40,469.75 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,024.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Sep-2000 42,024.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Sep-2000 42,070.46 PDC 45.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,028.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF C3 A 15-Sep-2000 42,028.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Sep-2000 42,073.% PD 45.96 ll-De 2000 7:40:05 &ecnrive Workbench ORANGL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .42,028.00 FIILMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Sep-2000 42,029.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Sep-2000 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,414.50 FIILMC GROUP e78-6064 01-Oct-2000 8,414.50 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Oct-2000 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -590.78 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE k000-11150 01.Oct-2000 590.78 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 10/21/9 01-Oct-2000 0.00 PC 03-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,234.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Oc1-2000 40,234.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 15-Oct-2000 .40,278.00 PD 4A.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.672.55 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Nov-2000 32,672.55 3133TO2D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Nov-2000 -32,626.60 PD 45.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,672.55 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Nov-2000 32,672.55 3133T02D5 5.900%061152017 01-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,752.45 FHLMC GROUP MG5.0476 01-Nov-2000 92,752A5 3128DDQ55 7.0000A 02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2000 -94,201.71 PD 1,449.26 11-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Ewculive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 =&CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER _ COMPL DATE GAINILOSS TANG TERM I11'P.R-PIMCO -92.752.45 FHLMC GIWlING3.0476 01-Nov-2000 92,752.45 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 112/01/ 01-Nor-200n 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG PERM OPER-PIMCO -34.666.75 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Nov-2000 34,666.75 36225CAZ9 7.125% 1 2120/2 0 2 6 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2000 -35,240.92 PD -574.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,666.75 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Nov-2000 34,666.75 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,273.57 GNMA II POOL 8080088Ivi 01-Nov-2000 53,275.57 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/9 01-Nov-2000 -54,440.97 PD -1,165.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53.275.57 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Nov-2000 $3,275.57 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/01/9 01-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,806.13 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01-Nov-2000 6,806.13 36225CNM4 6.500%0420/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2000 .6,744.45 PD 61.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,806.13 GNMA 11 POOL#0030395 01-Nov-2000 6,806.13 36225CNM4 6.500%04/202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 7:40.05 Ewcotfw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000/0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,444.75 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Nov-2000 7,444.75 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2000 -7,263.28 PD ISIA7 LONG TERM OPER-PINICO .35,272.42 GNMA 11 POOL 4080408X 01-Nov-2000 35,272.42 36225CN28 6.5001%05202030 DID 05/01/ 01-Nov-2000 -34,914.18 PD 358.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,272.42 GNMA II POOL N080408X 01-Nov-2000 35,272.42 36225CN28 6.500%05/202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,927.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Nov-2000 1,927.35 398108AE4 7.4301A 06/01/2003 DO 02129/0 01-Nov-2000 -1,899.19 PD 28.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,927.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Nov-2000 1,927.35 39810HAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02/29/0 01-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 27-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,667.80 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-2000 2,667.80 31677EAA4 6.200%0910 1/2 0 0 1 DO 03115/9 15-Nov-2000 -2,667.80 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,667.90 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-2000 1,667.80 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03115/9 15-Nov-2000 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-1000 7:40:05 EncorAr Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCS000010000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER _ COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29.290450 GREEN TREE CORD 99-D CL A-1 15-Nov-1000 28,290.50 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 08/26t9 15-Nov-2000 -28,290.50 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .28,290.50 GREENTREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Nov-2000 28,290.50 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 08/26/9 15-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .39,239.00 GNMA GTD RE•MIC TR 2000.9 F1i 16-Nov-2000 39,239.00 3837144NX9 VAR RE 02/162030 16-Nov-20D0 .39,239.00 PD 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -39,239.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Nov.2000 39.239.00 3837H4NX9 VAR RE 0211 612 03 0 16-Nov-2000 0.00 PC 16-Nov-2000 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,800,000.00 BELL ATLNTIC FINL DISC 01-Nov-2000 789,45046 07795AL19 11/01/2000 01-Nov-2000 -789,450.46 MT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 02-Nov-2000 5,508,909.00 313588M93 MAT 11/02/2000 02-Nov-2000 -5,508,909.00 MT 02-Nov2000 0.00 1I-Den2000 7:40:05 Executive Wmkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPUR-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERAL IIOME LN MI G CARP DIS 07-Noe-2000 2,279,964.45 313396N66 MAT 11/07/2000 07-Nov-20110 -2,279,964.45 MT 07-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPF-R-PIMCO -6.300,000.00 VERIZON GLOBL FDG DISC 10-Now2000 6,220,620.00 92344ALA5 11/10/2000 10-Nov-2000 -6,220,620.00 MT 10-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000.000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 15-Nov-2000 2,997,309.33 90328ALF8 11/15/2000 15-Nov-2000 -2,997,308.33 MT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 21-Nov-2000 983,675.00 43851RLM0 11/21/2000 21-Nov-2000 -983,675.00 MT 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 21-Nov-2000 590.205.00 43831RLM0 11/21/2000 21-Nov-2000 -590,205.00 MT 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 22-Nov-2000 2,271,786.67 313396Q55 MAT 11/22/2000 22-Nov-2000 -2,271,796.67 MT 22-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 28-Nov-2000 996,878.00 07588RLU7 11/28/2000 28-Nov-2000 -986,878,00 MT 28-Nov-2000 0.00 I/-Deo-2000 7.40.05 Emut1w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc00010000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL I IOME LN M'1'G CORI'DIS 30-Nov-2000 493,653.33 313396R54 MAT 11/30/2000 30-Nov-2000 -493,653.33 MT 30-Nov-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 ICI WILMINGTON INC G'I'D NT 15-Nov-2000 1,000,000.00 449909AAS 9.500%11/15/2000 15-Nov-2000 -1,008,480.00 MT 15-Nov-2000 -8,480.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 420,000.00 DANKAMERICA CORP SR NI 01-Nov-2000 13,%5.00 06605002 6.650Yo 05/012001 DO 05/01/9 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Nov-2000 0.73 996087094 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 01-Nov-2000 63,000.00 020002AL5 7.875%05/01/2005 DD 05/0110 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 01-Nov-2000 133,473.47 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2003 DD 0428/0 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 II-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000 - 30-NOV-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR#00570 01-Nov-2000 17,534.31 44181 KZT4 FLTGRT08/01/2001 DD09/04/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMC'0 800,000.00 BELL A'I'LN'I'IC FINL DISC 01-Nov-2000 10,549.54 07785AL19 11/01/2000 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPL'R-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM I* 02-Nov-2000 2.016.60 9MB5247 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 275.000.00 FEDERAL HOME-LN BK CONS BDS 02-Nov-2000 7,067.50 3133M6EA2 5.140%05/02/2001 DO WOW 02-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Nov-2000 662.18 996095247 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL M'I'G ASSN DISC N 02-Nov-2000 91,091.00 31358SM93 MAT 11/02/2000 02-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 02-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 590.78 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 0000-I1150 03-Nov-2000 6,076.85 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 10121/9 01.0c1.2000 0.00 IT 03-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Dec-2000 740.05 ErecuNw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: i9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000 -30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Nov-1000 20,035.55 3133961,166 MAT 11/07/2000 07-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 07-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,300,000.00 VERIZON GLOBL FOG DISC 10-Nov-2000 79,380.00 92344ALA5 1 I/102000 10-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 10-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Nov-2000 34,409.37 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 02/13/ 13-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 13-Nov-2000 35,449.12 066363DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/III 11-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 ICI WILMINGTON INC GTD NT 15-Nov-2000 47,500.00 449909AA8 9.500%11/15/2000 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-20D0 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN#TR 00006 13-Nov-2000 15,425.00 90269QAF6 6.170%03/06/2001 DD 03/0619 13-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN&JEN TR000 15-Nov-2000 30,550.00 25766CALS 6.110%05/152001 DO 05127/9 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 ll-Deo-2000 7:40:05 ErecuHve Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION—DISTRICT� PAGE- 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMC'O 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR C'R CO N'I' 15-Nov-2000 33,750.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/15/2005 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG PERM OPER-PIMCO 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 15-Nov.2000 65,563.50 81240QGW6 6.540%02/20/2003 DO 02/2019 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT I3-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 15-Nov-2000 50,000.00 613041GH9 5.000% 11/13/2029 DO 12/01/9 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,752.45 FHLMC GROUP 805.0476 15-Nov-2000 45,036.48 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Ncv-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 15-Nov-2000 2,691.67 90328ALFS H115/2000 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,672.55 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1374 E 15-Nov-2000 717.02 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,667.80 FIFTH THIRD RK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Nov-2000 50.46 31677EAA4 6.200%09/0112001 DO 03/15/9 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 1/-Deo-2000 7:40:05 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,028.00 IzHI-MC MULTICLASS CTF F3 A 15-Nov-2000 15,565.97 3133TCE95 VAR RT08/15/2032 15dk1-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMC'O 3.50 PI ILMC Mill,I'ICLASS CI P 1:3 A 15-Nov-2000 3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Oco-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 8,414.50 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-Nov-2000 1,573.69 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/0 1 20 2 8 DO 12/011 01-Oc1.2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,290.50 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Nov-2000 960.90 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/152013 DO 09/26/9 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nev-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP NTR 00562 I3-Nov-2000 66.424.00 37042WZKO FLTG RT 021]42003 DO 02/14/ 15-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,490.60 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTP SER 162 16-Nov-2000 IZ480.60 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 16-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,239.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 200019 FM 16-Nov-2000 14,53Z33 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 16-Nov-2000 0.00 Il-Dm2000 7:40:05 EvecurNe Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE• 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00016000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE;DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20-Nov-2000 70,027.18 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO OB/17/ 18-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 2NNov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINICO 34.666.75 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-Nov-2000 7,345.34 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/20/2026 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 1'1' 20•Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,275.57 GNMA 11 POOL N080088M 20-Nov-2000 10,546.25 36223CC20 VAR RT06120/2027 DO 06/0119 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 6,806.13 GNMA II POOL N0080395 20-Nov-2000 6.674.95 36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,272.42 GNMA 11 POOL N080408X 20-Nov-2000 53,589.34 36225CN28 6.500Yo05/20/2030 DO 05/01/ 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTRO06 20-Nov-2000 7,885.94 17120QE80 FLTG RT 08/09/2002 DD 04/08/ 20-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 GNMA GM REMIC TR 2000.2 PA 21-Nov-2000 11,666.67 3837H3C70 7.000%12/202022 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2000 0.00 11-Deo2000 7:40:05 Encvtive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2000-30-NOV-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER _ COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 21-Nov-2000 16,325.00 43851RLM0 1121/2000 21-Nov2000 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 14ONEYWELL INTL DISC 21-Nov-2000 9,795.00 43851RLM0 1121/2000 21-Nov2000 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 22-Nov-2000 28,213.33 313396Q55 MAT 11222000 22-Nov-2000 0.00 1T 22-Nov2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 27-Nov-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.300%09252018 25-Ow-2000 0.00 IT 27-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO TERM ENHANCED 27-Nov-2000 33,900.00 345397SC8 FLTG RT 0827/2006 DO 0827/ 27-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 27-Nov-2000 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,927.35 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#93 27-Nov-2000 8,089.26 39810#AE4 7.430%0610112003 DO 02/29/0 01-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 27-Nov-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 28-Nov-2000 13,122.00 07588RLU7 1129/2000 28-Nov-2000 0.00 13' 28-Nov-2000 0.00 II-Dea2000 7:40:05 &emrtive Wokbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS600010000 01-NOV-2000 - 30-NOV-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIMLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS IN'FADJ 30-Nov-2000 10.48 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGI IT INTEREST 30-Nov-2000 0.00 CD 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER.PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 30-Nov-2000 6,346.67 313396R54 MAT 11/30/2000 30-Nov-2000 0.00 IT 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 30-Nov-2000 10,587.60 79549BBG1 3.650%02/14/2002 DD 02/141 0.00 CD 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Nov-2000 140,760.00 9126272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 30-Nov-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Nov-2000 49,695.00 9129273AB 3.625%07115/2002 DD 07/13/ Roo CD 30-Nov-2000 0.00 ll-Dec-2000 7:40:05 Executive Workbench ' FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bit.ofDir. 12/13/00 12/20/00 AGENDA REPORT teem Number Item Number FAHR00-95 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources and Employee Development Originator. Janet Gray, Human Resources Assistant SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-33, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. SUMMARY The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Lim item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy Number From TO Reason And Sub"ect For Chan e c10A0-ctaselfwations.Positions, Current Language. Revised Language. Per the negotiated SPRAT Salary Ranges S Wages w/Exhibil'A' MOU regarding changes to the Its benefit. D10.00—Leave-or-Absence with Pay Cunenl Language, Revised Language. Pa the negotiated SPMT MOU. D30.00—Holidays Current Language. Revised Language. Indbates eligibility to Floating Holiday accrual. W0.0D-Benefits Option Plan(BOP) Cunenl Language. No Language. Element eliminated per the negotiated SPMT MOU. wWmtl�bl4ry.aatlaeWaabN fteM Rrpva=0 aaia Ipm4 R0pb112N 14(Md- GUWm1N1]al0ke4W Y ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS 1. C10.00 - Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges & Wages w/Exhibit 'A' 2. D10.00 - Leave-of-Absence With Pay 3. D30.00 - Holidays \4tlonW11Mp.COLBUL�aN N.n Re ftN BUN Agenda ROMWI FMan 141E Cmw U I V,=9,24 AM m Orange County Policy Number: C10.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 14, =00 December 20, 2000 Subject: CLASSIFICATIONS, Supersedes: "'^�•^..e.�.. .^- ' POSITIONS, SALARY May 24, 2000 RANGES AND WAGES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's compensation programs. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Classifications are groups of positions, regardless of location,which are alike enough in duties and responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title, to be given the same pay scale under similar conditions, and to require substantially the same qualifications. Salary Ranges are the range of pay rates,from minimum to maximum, set for a pay grade or class. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows employees to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and personal medl. Every position is assigned to a salary grade based upon the duties and responsibilities of that position and the comparative market value of that job function. Comparisons are most generally made with organizations of similar size and engaged in similar occupational pursuits within the geographic area of potential recruitment. The basic salary ranges are set forth on Exhibit A. 4.2 Non-management employees are awarded merit increases based upon their performance, as determined by the performance evaluation program, and the position of their salary within the pay range. The Merit Matrix is the tool used to determine the actual amount of merit increase. In addition, employees who at least meet expectations receive annual Cost of Living Adjustments(COLA)to keep employees' salaries at market. The amount of the COLD,is based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI,All-Urban Consumers-LA, Riverside, Orange County)for the month of May and is distributed as a base-building increase. Page 1 4.3 Employees in the Executive Management and Management Groups are awarded e merit increases based upon their performance, as determined by the performance evaluation program and the position of their salary relative to the external market External market rates are determined through the use of salary surveys. The merit increase may be distributed as base building or non-base building. 4.4 The General Manager is authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy budgeted positions and to exercise supervision over all persons in accordance with the provisions of this policy and to terminate, for cause, the employment of any regular full time employee employed under these provisions. All other employees, e.g., probationary, pan-time, and limited term/temporary and contract may be terminated at the District's sole discretion. 4.5 The General Manager is also authorized to employ Executive Management employees on an"at-will"basis. Such status shall be memorialized by a written agreement signed by the General Manager and the Executive Manager, acknowledging that the Executive Manager shall serve at the pleasure of the General Manager. Any Executive Management employee so employed on the date of adoption of this policy,who has not signed an"at-will"agreement may voluntarily elect to do so, but may not be required to do so. 4.6 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this policy or any prior Board action, the General Manager is authorized to periodically adjust the rate of compensation of Executive Management employees who have signed"at-will"agreements so long as no adjustment exceeds the compensation permitted by the applicable salary range established by the Jews Boards,of Directors. 4.7 Employees who believe their position is not properly classified may request a classification study of their position through their Department Head. Classification studies shall only be conducted during the budget planning process in accordance with a schedule that is announced annually by the General Manager. Reclassifications approved in the budget may be made effective any time during the new fiscal year. Classification studies may also be considered one other time during the year in November. Classification study requests must be submitted to Human Resources no later than October 10P for the November cycle. 4.7.1 All classification study findings regarding existing classifications are subject to approval by the General Manager; findings recommending new job classification titles are subject to approval by the District's Boards of Directors. 4.8 The District shall provide an investment incentive salary to the employees within the classifications and in the amounts, as set forth in Section 4.8.1, which amounts are based on a percentage of salary equal to the amount previously paid to designated employees pursuant to District Policy No. C150.00, Section 7.1, effective October 22, 1997, and repealed April 22, 1998. 4.8.1 The percentage of base salary amounts are as follows: Executive management classifica0ons-6%(up toa marr4mum 'R2 9 Division management, Supervisory, Professional and Exempt Confidential classifications—4% Rpefesi;W-al and Non exempt Confidential classifications—3% Page 2 4.8.2 Employees in'the Professional, Supervisory, Division management, Executive management and Exempt Confidential classifications shall receive additional investment incentive salary at a flat rate of$48.08 per pay period. This now replaces the.deleted Benefits Option Plan(BOP). 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Executive Management, Management, Supervisory, Professional and OCEA Group Employees 5.1.1 New Employees. Employees shall be offered a salary based upon ate usless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings result in a requirement for a salary greater than the minimum.The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised, if any. 5.1.1.1 Employees serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period. Employees who successfully conclude their probation are eligible for a salary adjustment the subsequent July in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program established by separate action of the Boards of Directors as amended from time to time. 5.1.2 Annual Performance Review Progrem. An annual performance review is completed for all employees in accordance with the provisions of the performance evaluation Program. Performance based salary adjustments occur on the first day of the first pay period in July, and may be prorated based upon the date of hirer or promotion in those instances where the individual has not concluded probation as of July 1. 5.1.3 Promotional Increases. Employees who earn promotions to a higher pay range will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings,and in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised.The new salary will normally represent an increase of at least 5.5 percent. Employees are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of the Promotional Probationary Period. If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1,the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until such time as probation is successfully concluded. 5.2 Local 501 Employees on the Five-Step Pay Plan 5.2.1 New Employees. Employees who successfully complete their Initial Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%)effective on the first day of the pay period following completion of the Initial Probationary Period. The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is established on the first day of a pay period following 26 weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of probation. 5.2.2 Annual Merit Increase. Employees who are not at the top of the salary range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual Page 3 salary adjustment of up to one step(5.5 k) on their Salary Review date, provided their performance fully meets expectations. ` 5.2.3 Promotional Increase. Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional increase of 5.5%, or to the base of the new range, whichever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an employee has not successfully completed their Promotional Probationary Period on their Salary Review date, any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Sections 624 5.1.1,-5.2,2 5.1.2 and-444 5.1.3 do not apply to At-will Executive Management Employees. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Exhibit 8.2 Fair Labor Standards Act Page 4 Orange County Policy Number: D10.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: Ootcbar-2F 1000 Subject: LEAVE-OF-ABSENCE WITH PAY Supersedes: April 02, 0000 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's leave-of-absence with pay program. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District's employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Vacation Leave. Except as otherwise provided, regular full-time employees accrue vacation leave, in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Hours-Biweekly Hours-Annually In years 0 through 1 3.08 80 In years 2 through 4 3.08 80 In years 5 through 10 4.62 120 In year 11 4.93 128 In year 12 5.24 136 In year 13 5.54 144 In year 14 5.85 152 In year 15 and over 6.16 160 4.1.1 Vacation leave begins to accrue after a new employee has completed six months of continuous service. After the first six months of service, the employee's account will be credited with 40 hours. After that time, the employee will accrue vacation hours consistent with the above chart. Vacation leave may only be utilized in increments of one-half houror more. Vacation leave is accrued for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status. A full-time, regular employee will be granted pro rate vacation leave credit during any pay period in Page I of 8 which he/she is absent without pay for one(1)full working day. A part-time, regular 1 employee will not be granted vacation leave credit during any period he/she is absent without pay on his/her regular working day. Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, It must be used prior to said December date, all other remaining hours in excess of 200 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. 4.2 Sick Leave. Sick leave is an insurance or protection provided by the District to be granted to employees in circumstances of adversity to promote the health and welfare of the individual employee. It is not an earned right to take time off from work. Sick leave is defined as the absence from duty of an employee because of a bona fide illness, injury, or pregnancy, or to attend to the illness or Injury of a family member as hereinafter defined. Temporary employees are not entitled to sick leave benefits. 4.2.1 Sick-Leave Accrual. Full-time employees hired prior to November 27, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of three and one-half(3.5)hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service(ninety-one(91) hours per year). Full-time employees hired on or after November 27, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of three(3.0) hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service(seventy-eight(781 hours per year), beginning with the first day of employment. 4.2.2 Sick-Leave Credit. A full-time, regular employee shall be granted pro rate sick-leave credit during any pay period in which he/she is absent without pay. A part-time, regular employee shall not be granted sick-leave credit during any period he/she is absent without pay on his/her regular working day. In the event an employee is required to work part-time by direction of his/her physician, sick-leave credit shall be prorated,except that sick leave shall continue to accrue if an employee is absent due to an injury arising out of or in the course of his/her employment and is entitled to Workers'Compensation benefits. 4.2.3 Annual Payoff. Employees may elect annually to be paid for any unused sick leave hours accrued through the end of October at their current hourly rate according to the following payoff schedule or as specified in a Memoranda of Understanding. Accrued Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0-100 0% 101-240 25% 241-560 35% Over 56D(mandatory) 50% 4.2.4 Sick Leave Incentive Plan. The Sick Leave Incentive Plan applies to Executive Management, Management, Supervisory and Professional Groups. The Plan will be administered on an individual Group basis. If the average sick leave usage of employees in a Group is under 40 hours per year, calculated on annualized actual time off during the period from January 1 to December 31 exclusive of catastrophic illness or injury requiring absence in excess of 200 hours or industrial injury leave in excess of 80 hours,the annual payoff for unused sick leave will be as follows: Page 2 of 8 Accrued Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0-100 400% 101-240 40®% 241-560 50N% Over 560(mandatory) W®% 4.2.5 Employees who separate for any reason other than retirement or death shall be compensated for any accrued and unused sick leave according to the abe M schedule. Employees who retire or decease shall be paid at the fifty percent (50%) rate for all accrued and unused sick leave 4.2.6 Permissible Uses. Sick leave may be applied only when: a. The employee is physically or mentally unable to perform his or her normal functions due to illness, injury, or a medical condition. b. The absence is for the purpose of obtaining professional diagnosis or treatment for a medical condition of the employee or the absence is due to medical and dental office appointments of an employee when approved by the employee's supervisor. c. The absence is for other medical reasons of the employee, such as pregnancy or obtaining a physical examination. d. The absence is for the care of the employee's parent, father-in-law, mother-in- law, brother, sister, spouse, child, step-child, grandchild,grandparent, legal guardian, or any family member with whom the employee resides. e. The absence is due to a job-related injury. I. In accordance with Labor Code Section 233, the absence is because the employee's presence is needed to attend to an illness of a parent(biological, foster or adoptive), step parent, legal guardian, spouse, child(biological,foster or adopted), step child, legal ward or a child of a person standing in loco parentis, provided that no more than the amount of sick leave that would accrue to the employee during six(6) months at the employee's then current rate of accrual shall be applicable to this type of sick leave in each calendar year. 4.2.7 General Provisions. To qualify for sick-leave pay, the employee must notify the District at or in advance of the time the employee is scheduled to report for duty. Minimum charge to the employee's sick-leave account shall be one-half(.5) hour and thereafter in one-half(.5) hour increments. 4.2.8 Human Resources shall be responsible for control of abuse of the sick-leave privilege. If notified in advance by a manager or supervisor, the employee may be required, at any time,to furnish a certificate issued by a licensed physician or nurse, or other satisfactory evidence of illness, however, for absences of ten (10) consecutive working days or more, a request for leave and a medical statement, on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. Upon return to work, a written doctors release must be submitted to Human Resources. For absences of one or more working days in an unpaid status, a request for leave and a medical statement, on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. Page 3 of 8 4.2.9 If the need for leave is due to the employee's serious health condition, as defined in the Family and Medical Leave Act("FMLA")or the California Family Rights Act ("CFRA"), the certification requirement shall comply with provisions of these Acts. 4.3 Personal Leave. Personal leave is provided to allow employees time off with pay for vacation, personal business and non-job-related illness or injury. Personal leave is accrued by full-time employees for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status, on a biweekly basis as follows: Personal Leave Hours Biweekly Annual Years of Service 0 through 1 2.31 80• 2 through 4 5.38 140 5 through 10 6.92 180 11 7.23 188 12 7.54 196 13 7.85 204 14 8.15 212 15 and over 8.46 220 *Only 60 hours may be taken in the first year,the 20 additional hours shall be credited to the accrual balance following successful completion of one year's service. 4.3.1 Scheduled Time Off. Management shall make a reasonable effort,considering the operational needs of the District,to accommodate all employee requests for time off. Scheduled time off should normally be requested at least two weeks in advance to increase the likelihood of those dates being approved. However, In the event unforeseen circumstances prevent such advance notification, employees may request scheduled time off with as little as one day's notice. Employees with at least one year's service must request at least 40 hours off each year. Preference among employees who request time off at least six months in advance shall be based on seniority. Requests received less than six months in advance shall be scheduled in the order received. Personal leave may only be reported in one-half-hour or one- hour increments. 4.3.2 Unscheduled Time Off. Personal leave that is classified as unscheduled time off provides income protection to an employee who is unable to work due the following: a. The employee is physically or mentally unable to perform his or her normal functions due to illness,injury,or a medical condition. b. The absence is for the purpose of obtaining professional diagnosis or treatment for a medical condition of the employee or the absence is due to medical and dental office appointments of an employee when approved by the employee's supervisor. c. The absence is for other medical reasons of the employee,such as pregnancy or obtaining a physical examination. d. The absence is for the care of the employee's parent, father-in-law, mother-m- law, brother, sister, spouse, child, stepchild, grandchild,grandparent, legal guardian, or any family member with whom the employee resides. Page 4 of 8 e. The absence is due to a job-related injury, v f. In accordance with Labor Code Section 233,the absence is bemuse the employee's presence is needed to attend to an illness of a parent(biological, foster or adoptive), step parent, legal guardian, spouse, child (biological, foster or adopted), step child,legal ward or a child of a person standing in loco parentis, provided that no more than the amount of sick leave that would accrue to the employee during six(6) months at the employee's then current rate of accrual shall be applicable to this type of sick leave in each calendar year. Unscheduled time off must be accounted for by completion of an Unscheduled Time Off Report upon the employee's return to work. Employees may be required to submit medical documentation for their injury or illness. It is the responsibility of District's management to control the potential abuse of unscheduled time off privileges. Tardiness less than 15 minutes shall not be deducted from the employee's pay, but numerous occurrences will be addressed through the progressive discipline procedures. Tardiness of one hour or more shall be considered an unscheduled occurrence. 4.3.3 An employee's attendance record shall be reviewed with an employee after five separate occurrences of unscheduled time off to provide an opportunity to assess problems that could potentially lead to disciplinary action. The accumulation of the sixth and seventh occurrence within a calendar year shall result in a verbal warning. The eighth occurrence shall result in a written warning. Employees who are charged with ten occurrences of absence within a twelve-month period shall be subject to termination. Absences of multiple consecutive days Involving the some Injury or illness shall be considered a single occurrence. The District also has the right to discipline employees on the basis of total absences away from work. Employees must notify their supervisor prior to the start time of their shift when they are unable to report for work. Employees returning from an extended leave should notify their supervisor as soon as possible to facilitate personnel scheduling. 4.3.4 Human Resources shall be responsible for control of abuse of the unscheduled leave privilege. The employee may be required, at any time,to furnish a certificate issued by a licensed physician or nurse,or other satisfactory evidence of illness; however, for unscheduled absences of ten (10)consecutive working days or more, a request for leave and a medical statement, on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. Upon return to work, a written doctor's release must be submitted to Human Resources. For absences of one or more working days in an unpaid status, a request for leave and a medical statement on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. 4.3.5 Personal Leave and Workers'Compensation Leave. Employees who are injured in the course of their employment are placed on Workers'Compensation Leave, and receive wage loss benefits to which they are entitled under the Workers' Compensation Act. Employees may request to receive prorated Personal Leave pay to supplement their Workers'Compensation payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay. 4.3.6 Personal Leave Payoff. Employees(or their estate)who separate, retire or die shall be paid In full at their current rate of pay for all Personal Leave hours accrued. 4.3.7 Maximum Accrual. Employees may only accrue up to 400 hours of Personal Leave as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. Employees may request to be paid in full for up to 40 such hours in excess of the 400 limit; any remaining time shall be scheduled off by the District. Page 5 of 8 4.3.8 Sick Leave Bank. Employees who elect to bank sick leave accrued prior to the Implementation of Personal Leave provisions may elect to use such time off for absence due to illness or injury once 40 continuous hours of Personal Leave have been used. (The 40 hour stipulation does not extend to employees in the Confidential Group). Employees who retire or the shall be paid at the 50 percent rate for all Banked Sick Leave hours; an employee who separates shall be compensated for Banked Sick Leave as follows. Banked Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0 - 100 0 percent 101 - 240 25 percent 241 -560 35 percent Over 560 50 percent 4.3.9 If the need for leave is due to the employee's serious health condition,as defined In the Family and Medical Leave Act("FMLK)or the California Family Rights Act ("CFRA"), the certification requirement shall comply with the provisions of these Acts. 4.4 Jury Duty Leave. Any full-time, including probationary, employee who is called for jury duty shall, upon request on prescribed forms approved by Human Resources, be entitled to his/her regular pay for those hours of absence due to performance of the jury duty for a period up to twenty-two(22)working days, provided that his/her fees for such service, exclusive of mileage, are submitted to the District for deposit in the General Fund of the District. 4.4.1 Prior to jury duty service, each employee must complete the District's Leave-of- Absence Form and turn it in to Human Resources with a copy of the summons. To be entitled to receive regular pay for such jury leave, employees must report for work during their regularly scheduled work shift when they are relieved from jury duty service, unless there is less than one-half('h)of their regular shift remaining. Employees are not compensated for jury duty occurring on scheduled days off. 4.4.2 An employee serving jury duty must obtain an attendance slip from the court to be submitted to Payroll with his/her time sheet in order to be eligible for regular pay for those hours of absence due to jury duty. 4.5 Witness Leave. Any full-time, including probationary, employee, who is required to be absent from work by a subpoena properly issued by a court, agency or commission legally empowered to subpoena witnesses,which subpoena compels his/her presence as a witness, except in a matter wherein he/she is named as a defendant or plaintiff or as an expert witness, shall, upon request on Leave-of-Absence Forms approved by Human Resources, be entitled to the time necessary to comply with such subpoena, provided - any fees received for such service,exclusive of mileage, are submitted to the District for deposit in the General Fund of the District. 4.5.1 An employee so subpoenaed must submit a copy of the subpoena with his/her time sheet in order to be eligible for pay for such absence. To be entitled to receive regular pay for such witness leave, the employee must report for work at the District for time not actually retained on witness service of one(1)hour or more prior to and/or upon completion of each day's service,exclusive of travel time. Page 6 of 8 4.6 Military Leave. A request for military leave shall be made upon Leave-of-Absence Forms v approved by Human Resource and shall state the date when it is desired to begin the leave-of-absence and the date of anticipated return. A copy of the orders requiring such military service shall be submitted with the request. 4.6.1 Provisions of the Military and Veterans Code of the State of California, Sections 395- 395.5 shall govern military leave. In general, current law provides that an employee having one year or more service with a public entity is entitled to military leave with pay not exceeding thirty(30)days per year if the employee is engaged in military duty ordered for purposes of active military training or encampment. An employee who Is required to attend scheduled service drill periods or perform other inactive duty reserve obligations is entitled to military leave without pay, not exceeding seventeen(17)calendar days per year, although the employee may, at his or her option, elect to use vacation or personal leave time to attend the scheduled reserve drill periods or to perform other inactive drill period obligations. Employees who participate in weekend military drill duty are not eligible for leave with pay for such activity, but may have their regular work schedule changed to accommodate the required time off. 4.7 Bereavement Leave. Using the prescribed forms, approved by Human Resources,any full-lime employee, whether probationary or regular,shall receive a maximum of three (3) days off with pay for the death or funeral of an immediate family member. Immediate family member is defined as the employee's father, father-in-law, mother, mother-in-law, brother,sister, husband, wife, chili, stepchild,step parent, grandchild, grandparent, legal guardian, or any family member with whom the employee resides or who is identified in the employee's memorandum of understanding (MOU), if applicable. 5.0 PROCEDURE 6.0 EXCEPTIONS Section 4.1,Vacation, including Subsections 4.1.1, of this policy does not apply to employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding and employees In the Confidential Group. Section 4.2, Sick Leave,including Subsections 4.2.1 through 4.2.8, of this policy does not apply to employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding and employees in the Confidential Group. Section 4.3, Personal Leave, including Subsections 4.3.1 through 4.3.9,of this policy applies only to those employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding and employees in the Confidential Group. Vacation leave is not accrued for overtime hours worked. Accrued balances of vacation leave,compensatory leave, and personal leave may be cashed out at the employee's request on an annual basis in December of each calendar year. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours of vacation as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. 7.2 In the event an employee accrues vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, it must be used prior to the December date, all other remaining hours in excess of 200 will be Page 7 of 8 paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at the employee's then current y hourly rate of compensation. 7.3 Employees are not eligible to schedule vacation leave unfit the completion of six months continuous service. 7.4 Employees may not maintain a negative balance on vacation, sick, compensatory,or personal leave accruals. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Operations and Maintenance MOU 8.2 Administrative and Clerical MOU 8.3 Engineering MOU 8A Technical Services MOU 8.5 Supervisory MOU 8.6 Professional MOU 8.7 Personal Leave Unscheduled Time Off Report Form Page 8 of 8 Orange County policy Number: D30.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: octcbecas, Unn December 20, 2000 Subject: HOLIDAYS Supersedes: ApFil 2G 2000 October 25, 2000 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for holidays. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to grant employees 12 paid holidays per year in accordance with this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Full-time employees shall receive holiday pay if their entire scheduled work shift immediately preceding and following the holiday is in a paid payroll status.When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday, the employee shall be paid at the employee's regular rate of pay for the holiday or receive an equivalent amount of holiday compensatory time off, and shall also receive overtime pay at the rate of one-and-one-half times their regular hourly rate for all hours actually worked. 5.2 Holiday pay for part-time employees is based on a nine (9)hour workday. It is paid on the following prorated basis: NORMALLY SCHEDULED HOURS OF WORK PERCENT BENEFIT/SUBSIDY PER WEEK 0—under 19 None 20—under 29 50%-(4.5) hours 30—39 75%-(6.75)hours Page 1 of a 5.3 When a holiday occurs on an employee's regularly scheduled day off,the employee will accrue compensatory time off for those hours. In no case may an employee accumulate more than 50 hours holiday compensatory time off. 5.4 The days listed below are observed by the District as holidays for 2000, 2001 and 2002. SCHEDULE A HOLIDAY 2000 2001 2002 New Year's Day Mday,Dammber 31 Monday,January l Tuesday,JanuaryI Lincoln's Birthday FrMay,February ll Monday.Febuary 12 Tactlay,Fobmary 12 President's Day Montlay,Febmary21 Monday,Febmary 16 Monday,February to Memorial Day Mond",May 26 Monday,May 26 Mondry,May 27 Independence Day Tuesday,July W.danulay,July 4 Thumday.July Labor Day Monday.sepromber 4 Monday,September 3 Monday.searamber2 Veteran's Day Fdday,Naem1er10 Monday,November 12 Maday,Neamberll Thanksgiving Day n,u,sday,November 23 Tnurstl.v,N.v.mbe.22 Thursday,November 26 Day after Thanksgiving Friday,November 24 Friday,November 23 Fdtlay,November 20 Day before Christmas Monday.Daoun m25 Monday,tMoambar24 Tuesday,December 24 Christmas Day Tuesday.Deumber26 Tuesday.Dacemar 25 Wadnoaday,DaownWr25 Floating Holiday •' •• •• SCHEDULE HOLIDAY 2000 2001 2002 New Year's Day Saturday,January 1 Monday,January 1 Tuesday,January t Lincoln's Birthday SMuolay,Fobmary 12 Montlay.February 12 Tuesday,February 12 President's Day Monday,February 21 Monday,Febuary to Monday,Febmary 10 Memorial Day Monday,May 20 Monday,May 26 Mom".May 2T Independence Day Tuesday July Weenau.y,July ThmaJay.Juy4 Labor Day Moaday,S.PWrnW4 Monday,September 3 Monday.septenlar2 Veteran's Day Saturday.November ll Sunday.No anaarll Monday,Novomb.r ll Thanksgiving Day noonday.nimnater23 Thursday,November 22 mumday,Naember 2s Day after Thanksgiving Fdtlay,November 24 Fdday,November23 Fdday.November 20 Day before Christmas Sunday,Dommher 24 Monday,Dacambn 24 Tu.sday.Danember24 Christmas Day Monday,Dacambar 25 Tuaaay,December 25 Wednasday,Deumber25 Floating Holiday •• •• •• Page 2 of 3 Employees may elect one day during each year as a"Floating Holiday". The"Floating Holiday"must he used within the year it I5 accrued. o e<a e,�gST , N.eliiYel i o r erh Every effort shall be made to grant an employee's request for a"Floating Holiday"off providing an employee gives sufficient notice to their supervisor, 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 When an employee is on medical or pregnancy leave, holidays will be paid only during disability waiting period If employee is in a continuous paid status. All other holidays that occur outside the waiting period will not be paid, regardless if employee is in paid status or not. 6.2 Part-time employees who work on a holiday are not eligible to receive overtime pay. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 If a regularly scheduled holiday occurs on a Saturday,the previous Friday shall be taken off as the"holiday"for pay purposes. If a regularly scheduled holiday occurs on a Sunday,then the following Monday shall be taken off as the"holiday" for pay purposes. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 3 of 3 FAHR COMMITTEE Mr2jilsad[! reea.orar. 11/1Woo 17/zo/oo AGENDA REPORT Rem Numeer Item Number FAHROO-97 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION RESERVE FUND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors that the District conduct a competitive selection process and enter into a Reserve Fund Investment Agreement in order to maximize security, yield and liquidity. SUMMARY Interest earnings on reserve funds for tax exempt Certificates of Participation (COPS) are restricted by Federal law. A complex formula is used to determine eligible earnings and any excess must be rebated to the government. The government does not make up any shortfall if the allowable interest is not earned. Staff recommends long-term investment agreements be competitively placed in order to ensure that all permissible interest is earned while maximizing liquidity and safety. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The 1993 Refunding COPS were issued in a synthetic-fixed interest rate mode. The COP service reserve funds can earn up to 4.92% interest before excess earnings must be rebated to the Federal government. These reserves are invested in a money market fund and the earnings over the past eight years have fallen short of the allowable earnings by $145,000. A fixed rate investment agreement that yields slightly more than 4.92% will allow the District to recover the interest that we have failed to earn up to this point. There is approximately $4.5 million in this reserve fund. Interest earnings are used by the Trustee to make periodic payments to the COP-holders. eb dea""el2wN Agenda Re%Re=*SnaN Agenda Feo,.\1200Anem teleld- Rw.eB. aaom Page 1 The Series 2000 Refunding COPS were issued in August in a variable interest rate t mode. Because the interest cost changes each day for these COPs, the maximum allowable investment interest rate on the reserve funds cannot be established as a fixed amount. However, it is possible to enter into an investment interest agreement that will pay a rate to the District that is equal to the rate we pay the COP-holders Plus a fixed percentage. Such an agreement would ensure that the District receives the maximum allowable investment interest income. It would also very likely require periodic payments of"excess yield" to the Federal government, but only a rebate of earnings, not a penalty. Shortly after the Series 2000 Refunding COPS were issued, staff asked the Financial Services Group (FSG) of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, our bond counsel, to review options for the investment of COP Reserve Funds. Our goal was to be certain we earned as much interest as the law allowed and to maximize safety and liquidity of the approximately $17.3 million COP Reserve Fund. FSG identified and compared several investment vehicles and found that an Investment Agreement will provide OCSD with a substantially stronger combination of credit quality, yield and protection from market price risk and reinvestment risk than other alternatives. From a credit quality perspective, an appropriately structured IA will (1) have an AA- to AAA-rated counterparty, (2) provide for the counterparty to collateralize its obligations under the IA if its rating falls below AA(with the collateral held by an independent third- party custodian acting on OCSD's behalf), and (3) provide for OCSD to withdraw its deposit if the counterparty's credit rating drops below A/A2 by S&P or Moody's, respectively. The combination of initial counterparty financial strength and the two "downgrade" triggers, will result in an IA being a safe and prudent security. Similar securities are widely prevalent and are approved by all rating agencies and bond insurers. From the perspective of reducing or eliminating market price risk, the IA will provide for withdrawals at par when necessary, regardless of market conditions prevailing at the time. From a yield perspective, current market rates for IAs are significantly above the current yield offered by prudent alternatives and are sufficiently above the allowable interest earnings rate to offset all accumulated negative arbitrage. IAs will also virtually eliminate reinvestment rate risk by offering (1) a fixed rate over the life of the investment (for the 1993 Certificates) and a fixed spread over the floating rate index (for the 2000 A&B Certificates), (2) a final maturity date coinciding with that of the Certificates, and (3) interest payment dates corresponding to the dates on which the Reserve Fund earnings will be used to offset interest payments on the Certificates. N wgeump.na.ao.ie AYlntla Rep,NU0.V 8we na.nm a.wm,1]ow,em 1.P)eoc q„n,a �,yya Page 2 The leading alternative to an IA is the purchase (and "roll" into the future) of three to r five-year U.S. Agency securities. This strategy offers the high credit quality and 'familiar nature"of U.S. Agency securities. However, disadvantages of this strategy include lower current yields and taking on both substantial reinvestment rate risk when the securities mature and moderate market price risk if the securities need to be converted to cash in a higher interest rate environment than exists. Other options include utilizing money market funds and longer term U.S. Agency securities. While money market funds currently have attractive yields and provide excellent safety and liquidity, they also expose OCSD to interest rate risk, and therefore, possible negative arbitrage. For example, the Reserve Fund for the 1993 Certificates has generated approximately $145,000 of negative arbitrage while invested in a money market fund. As always, there is no assurance that current attractive money market rates will not fall or gain in the future. Longer term U.S. Agency securities provide attractive yields and safety but present significant market risk. Should we need to liquidate a long-term U.S. Agency security, there is a real possibility that such a sale could result in a capital loss if overall interest rates had increased from the date of purchase. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None GGS:lc H:Mp YbYPm�b now neon BmN/iw�RepoMt 100.Lm 1<hl.tloe n.:.ea: vase Page 3 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 13, 2000, 11:00 a.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 11:00 a.m. on November 13, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickier, Chair Jan Debay Philip L. Anthony Brian Donahue Jerry King, Alternate No. 1 Shawn Boyd, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Blake Anderson Denis Bilodeau (Dir. Elect) Kellene Burn-Roy, Dick Corneille, Bruce Jim Herberg Debra Burris Chalmers - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Lisa Lawson Steve Conklin Guy Carrozzo—Mayor of Fountain Valley David Ludwin Tom Dawes George Martin, John Hills Bob Ooten Jennifer DeNoyer - City of Anaheim Wendy Sevenandt Shivaji Deshmukh Bill Everest—Boyle Engineering Gary Streed Jill Everhart Richard Bell — IRWD Cindy Gehman Bob Finn— Brown & Caldwell Jenny Glasser Dave Reyes— LA Times John Kennedy Mike Markus William R. Mills Jr. Mehul Patel Ron Wildermuth 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Donahue, seconded by Director Debay and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held October 30, 2000 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Process Control and Information Systems Integration Tom Dawes, Program Manager, introduced Wendy Sevenandt, OCSD staff engineer, who gave a report on the integration of process control and information systems. The GWR System Minutes November 13, 2000 Page 2 of 3 GWR System will have full computer process control. Ms. Sevenandt explained that this provides an opportunity to tie in other systems, such as financial, laboratory, and warehouse. She reported that she and Jerry Jones, an OCSD consultant, are preparing a scope of work for final design for future consideration. 3. Approval of Design for Portion of Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline Mr. Dawes reported that early design of approximately 2,200 feet the GWR Pipeline between the Garden Grove (22) and Santa Ana (5) Freeways needed by the Sheriff for a staging area for the expansion of the Theodore Lacey Jail needs early design. If the GWR System is not approved in January, then this portion of the pipeline design would be cancelled with little financial risk. He recommended that the Committee recommend approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser 8 McKee Inc. adding $56,970 for final design on this portion of the pipeline. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Debay and carried, the Committee recommended that the Boards of Directors approve Amendment No. 2 to Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Task Order# 201414 (Professional Services Agreement), in an amount of$56,970, for final design of a portion of the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline between the Santa Ana (5) and Garden Grove (22) Freeways, increasing the total task order amount to $5,039,920. 4. GWR System Proiect Cost Mr. Dawes introduced Ms. Kellene Burn-Roy, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. who gave a presentation on project's cost, $352 million, with a predicted unit cost of$433 per acre- foot based on a water production volume of 71,605 afy. 5. IRWD Proposal for Phased Development Mr. Dawes reported on Irvine Ranch Water District's phased development of the GWR System, which was sent to OCWD's Groundwater Producers. Briefings on the IRWD alternative proposal were made to OCSD's Financial, Administrative and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee on November 8, and the OCWD Groundwater Producers will discuss the IRWD proposal on November 28 at 2:00 p.m. at OCWD. The OCWD Board of Directors will review the proposal in early December. The project yield was discussed. The maximum capacity of the Phase 1 project is 78,405 afy based on the 70 mgd capacity AWT plant operating on a continuous basis. GWR System Minutes November 13,2000 Page 3 of 3 Director Anthony expressed that this maximum yield should be used to estimate the unit cost of the project. Staff reported that the average unit cost would be about $406/af based on production of 78, 405 afy. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: a. Gave an update on the Public Information Program: - 55,000 postcards announcing the public workshops were mailed and one-eighth page ads were run in local and regional newspapers advertising the workshops; - About 1,500 letters to homeowners associations about the GWR System were made. An article for homeowners newsletters has been prepared and will be sent to homeowners associations which request one, and - 1,500 letters for medical outreach program will be sent out shortly. b. The January 9 Joint Cooperative Committee will need to be changed. A new date will be scheduled for early January at the November 20 meeting, which will be at 5:30 p.m. GENERAL MANAGERS' REPORTS OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr. reported that Congress is still in session and that the increase from $20 million to $80 million in grant funding has still not been decided. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for November 20, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. i MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 20, 2000, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on November 20, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip L. Anthony Jan Debay Larry Kraemer, Jr. Brian Donahue Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Russell Patterson, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Bob Ghirelli Director Wes Bannister Kellene Burn-Roy, Dick Corneille Lisa Lawson Debra Burris - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. David Ludwin Steve Conklin Bill Everest — Boyle Engineering Bob Ooten Andrew Czorny Richard Bell — IRWD Wendy Sevenandt Tom Dawes Bob Finn— Brown & Caldwell Brad Hogin Jennifer DeNoyer Edmund Soong, Mike Kremer Shivaji Deshmukh - Public Resources Advisory Group Jill Everhart Don Herz — J.F. Shea Construction Cindy Gehman Graham Juby— Carollo Engineers John Kennedy Steve Tedesco—ASL Consulting Group Mike Markus Bob Finn — Brown & Caldwell Engineers William R. Mills Jr. Fred Soroushian— CH2M HILL Mehul Patel John Collins— City of Fountain Valley Ron Wildermuth Michelle Tuchman— NCG Porter Novelli Dennis Kasper, Bill Tappan— Parsons 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Debay and carried, with Directors Eckenrode and Kraemer abstaining, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held November 13, 2000 were approved as mailed. Director Pickler read and presented a resolution thanking Director Debay for her service on the GWR System. This will be her final meeting serving as a Joint Cooperative Committee member. Director Debay has worked hard and well with staff GWR System Minutes k November 20,2000 Page 2 of 3 and directors from the inception of the Groundwater Replenishment System and has supported quality reclamation and wastewater treatment goals. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. GWR System Project Governance Tom Dawes, Program Manager, told the Committee that OCWD General Manager Bill Mills and OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson recommend the Groundwater Replenishment System proceed under an Operations Agreement for design, construction, and operation. He reported that a Joint Powers of Authority (JPA) could be formed at any time, if a need is identified in the future. He also recommended that both Boards delegate to the Committee a higher financial decision authorization. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee recommended that staff proceed to develop an Operations Agreement between Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District to provide financing, design, construction, and operation of the Groundwater Replenishment System. 3. Financial Study Report Mr. Edmund Soong of Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG) gave an update, based on assumptions, for the Financial Study. On December 18, the Final Report will be presented to the Committee. 4. Proiect Final Design, Construction Management and Start-up Services Mr. Dawes reported that the Project Development Phase (30% design) of the GWR System is complete. Staff recommends that the Committee authorize staff to negotiate with the Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. led Consultant Management Team to complete the final design, provide construction management, and start-up training services for the GWR System. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode, and carried, staff Is requested to return this item to the Committee and include information on the level of effort for each major work item and who would do the work. a. GWR System Minutes e November 20, 2000 Page 3 of 3 5. Status Report a. Ms. Michelle Tuchman, NCG Porter Novelli gave an update on the Public Information Program. A written report dated November 20, 2000 was distributed. b. Mr. Dawes reported that Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez has accepted an invitation to attend the December 2 Joint Boards Workshop. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS Director Pickler reported that OCWD's Groundwater Producers have a financial concern in regards to the replenishment assessment that is imposed on the agencies for water usage. A GWR System presentation will be given to the Groundwater Producers on November 28 at 2:00 p.m., which will address these issues. Director Debay would like staff to investigate solar power as a potential means to supplement the electrical power needs of the project. Director Anthony reported that Mr. Jim Wood of Post magazine recently wrote an article about the Groundwater Replenishment System. Director Donahue reported that presentations given by Cindy Gehman to the City of Stanton and the Orange County Taxpayers Association were well received. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for December 18, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MMIWDes I Taaa.aw. ,anaoo AGENDA REPORT R.N.mW n.m 1NumW emt5M Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $56,970, for a total amount not to exceed $5,039,920, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District having equal shares in the additional amount of$28,485. SUMMARY The Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System Pipeline is planned to be constructed in the west side of the Santa Ana River Channel between Garfield Avenue and Kraemer Basin. The Orange County Sheriff plans an expansion of the Theodore Lacey Jail, which requires use of the same land between the Garden Grove (22) and Santa Ana (5) Freeways. The Sheriff has requested that construction of the GWR System Pipeline be completed by July 2001, prior to the start of the Jail construction. Approval of Addendum No. 2 with Camp Dresser& McKee for final design of this portion of the GWR System Pipeline is recommended to meet the Sheriffs schedule. The recommended action is being forwarded to the Board of Directors from the Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on November 13, 2000. The Orange County Water District Board approved this item at their November 15, 2000 meeting. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization for expenditure of$28,485 is being requested, as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: CORF Water Management Projects, pg. 164) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) N Vwy.tlOYO� YbN NWnM Repr41][O]BmN�penE fleperb113IXMem 151q� flm..a vices Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Refer to the attached Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Agenda Report dated November 13, 2000. ALTERNATIVES Not approving the Addendum. This Addendum is needed to complete construction by the Orange County Sheriffs deadline. CEOA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report for GWR System was certified on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal WS:jo:jak H:\wp.dlabgenda0oard Agenda ReportsQ000 Board Agenda Re,ms\7200VIem 15(c).doc HM ftWgmM.1B].MApM.Rogft ea WN OM.Rpmnl'A m15(41 R,A.., agora Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 T°• ORIGINAL CU(UtENT PROPOSE�b` PROPOSED FUNDS, THIS PROPOSED E ,r, td PROJECAJ7IS�(t<, �1UTlIORRED PROJ,h'1f3`P EUDGEI'4i REVISEI1y AUTHORIZED AUTHORVATION TOTAL EII�A-}{1�J}J�Yil�at�r m +,y;a f i�lldOET� s Dl1BT� s �Iti�keAsl ,91)U�iET ;, -TO�DATE+ ' : RF4U,Ii AUTHOR!/ATION f4 a< sp .,'1 4d Project Development $ 700,000 $ $ StudlesrPermlBin $ It Consultant PSA' $ 7.500,000 $ 11010000 $ 11,010.000 $ 3.862,551 $ 28.485 $ 3,891,036 $ 2,900,000 75% Design Staff $ 2.349,000 $ 1958000 $ 1,958.000 $ 1.958.000 $ 1.958,000 $ 500.000 26% Construcilon Contract $ 86.481.500 $ 131,500,000 $ 131,500,000 $ - $ Construction Administration $ 2,653,900 $ 1.419,000 $ 1,419000 $ - $ Construction Inspection $ 9,345,600 $ 6,335.000 $ 6. 35,000 $ - $ Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 26.000.000 $ 26.000,000 $ - $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 178,222,000 $ - $ 178.222,000 $ 5,820,551 $ 28,485 $ 5.849.036 $ 3,400.00D 58% Funds authorized to date includes multiple contracts issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District H1wp.dWa ,UOBS a CONT CTSW VgJJe budges Wtb Wm dec20W,slslgisWd Professional Services Agreement Status Report Groundwater Replenishment System Project Development Phase Job No. J-36 Total Project Budget: $178,222,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Start Date of Project: May 1994 Date Addendum Description Cost* Accumulated Costs 7/15/99 Original Provide engineering services for the Project $ 4,810,300 PSA Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System consisting of preparing design memoranda to the 30% design level. 312200 1 Provide additional engineering services for costs $ 172,649 $ 4,982,950 containment work. Pending 2 Provide engineering services for the early design $ 56,970 $ 5,039,920 of a section of the GW R Pipeline to be installed prior to Sheriff Department construction work along Santa Ana River levy. 'The full amount of the PSA is reported. OCSD will contribute 50% of the total amount shown. HAwp.dWWngW06S&CONTRA&W-UAPSA Status Report cdm add2 12_01doc 11/28/00 Revised 05114/98 Y AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: November 13, 2000 Budgeted: N/A Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600,70-01 To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Cost Estimate: $56,970 System Cooperative Committee General Counsel Approval: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. Project Report Approved: Yes Blake Anderson CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: APPROVAL OF DESIGN FOR PORTION OF GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT PIPELINE SUMMARY The GWR Pipeline is planned to be constructed in the west side of the Santa Ana River Channel between Garfield Avenue and Kraemer Basin. The Orange County Sheriff plans an expansion of the Theodore Lacey Jail, which requires use of the same land between the Garden Grove (22) and Santa Ana (5) Freeways. The Sheriff has requested that we complete construction of the GWR Pipeline by July 2001, prior to the start of the Sheriffs work. Approval of Amendment No. 2 with Camp Dresser & McKee for final design of this portion of the GWR Pipeline is recommended. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., adding $56,970 for final design of a portion of the GWR Pipeline between the Garden Grove and Santa Ana freeways, increasing the total contract price to an amount not to exceed $5,039,920. BACKGROUND The GWR Pipeline between the 22 and 5 Freeways is planned to be located west of the west Santa Ana River levee within Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) right- of-way. The Orange County Sheriff needs this site by mid-Summer 2001 for a staging area and employee parking while an expansion of the Theodore Lacey Jail takes place. OCFCD has recently sold fee title to this property to the County of Orange on behalf of the Sheriff. The Sheriff has asked that we install our pipeline prior to the start of the jail expansion project. Early design of approximately 2,100 feet of 66-inch pipe is recommended. i GWR System Pipeline Design November 13, 2000 Page 2 of 2 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) has already prepared the preliminary plans (30%) for this project. In October, your Committee granted staff authority to negotiate a proposal with CDM for the final design. CDM has submitted the enclosed proposal in the amount of$56,970. If your Committee approves of the proposal, a recommendation for a submittal to both Boards of Directors for final approval is in order. It should be noted that final approval would be given in late November, 2000, so charges expended prior to the January "Go/No Go" decision would be minimal. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS: October 16, 2000 Attachment FAHR COMMITTEE " ngD ToX 12/13/Og 12/20/00 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number FAHROO.98 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator. Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager SUBJECT: INCREASE IN THE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION TO $170 PER MEETING, MAXIMUM SIX MEETINGS PER MONTH GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-14, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Board of Director's Compensation and Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 98-3: a. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated November 10, 2000. b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-14 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) C. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-14, and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 24, 2001. SUMMARY Senate Bill 1559, which has passed both houses and has been signed by the Governor, allows the Board to adjust the amount of compensation it receives. For the last fourteen years, each Board member has received $100/meeting for up to 6 meetings per month. The Board has the discretion to increase its compensation up to $170 per meeting for up to ten meetings per month (up to $175 beginning next calendar year). Attached please find General Counsel's memorandum from November 20 providing further details. There are several policy issues worthy of your consideration prior to adopting a new compensation ordinance: SB 1559 goes into effect January 1, 2001. However, an ordinance adopted by the Board can go into effect no sooner than sixty days after adoption by the Board. H\wp.EtlYpenOal�aN A9anEa Ray61]tt09aa,O ABenEa Re�,411pO]Jlem 10 tls Page 1 • Directors have not had a compensation increase since 1986. t • Based on the Los-Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Area average CPI for all urban consumers, the $100 per meeting compensation rate adopted in 1986 would have increased to $144 to make today's compensation equivalent to the 1986 rate. • In May 1999, the Board supported a resolution (No. 99-06) modifying California's County Sanitation District Act governing compensation. This resolution passed 19-2. Last year, a similar bill modifying the Act was approved by the Legislature but was vetoed by the Governor. • We conducted a review of our sister agencies, many of which we use in our employee compensation comparisons. This is attached for your review. Please note that some of the agencies are governed by different laws and thus may not be apples-to-apples comparable. Nevertheless, our existing pay rate per meeting and number of meetings per month falls in the lower- middle of this compensation spectrum. It is likely that other wastewater agencies will adjust their Directors' compensation level with the passage of this bill. • The Steering Committee was presented an overview of this information in its November meeting. It is their opinion that the $170 per meeting is reasonable with the existing six meeting per month limit. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost of this adjustment is estimated to be $46,000 annually, raising the total cost of the Directors' compensation to an approximate $111,000 per annum. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The estimated six-month increase in cost for this program can be absorbed by the current Joint Operating budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not Applicable. M1w OWpendadBaN Agenda Re,amft V0 fd Agenda Rep %I MAom I d¢ Page 2 V. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Directors may choose any combination of payment from $100-$170 and any number of meetings up to a maximum of ten per month. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS November 20, 2000 General Counsel memorandum Draft Ordinance No. OCSD-14 External agency compensation comparison data H\vq.tlmWpenEaW rtl AOentla ReaN120N BovN PpeMV RepN\1]UNbm lB.tloc Page 3 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN Br SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: November 20, 2000 RE: Legislative Status Report—Senate Bill 1559 (Kelley and Rainey) Directors' Compensation for Sanitary and Sanitation Districts At the request and urging of the OCSD Board, and joined almost unanimously by numerous member agencies of CASA, the above-referenced Bill was again sponsored by CASA and authored by Senator Kelley during the summer Session of the Legislature. I am pleased to report that the Bill has successfully passed both Houses, been approved by the Governor on July 5, 2000, and Chaptered into law as Chapter 86, 2000 Stats., to be effective January 1, 2001. As you will recall, a nearly identical Bill was passed last year with little, if any, resistance in either the Senate or Assembly, but without any warning or information being provided to Senator Kelley, the Governor vetoed the Bill, and thus it had to be re-enacted this Session. As the Directors are aware, the present law pertaining to Sanitation District Directors is that they are entitled to receive the sum of $100.00 per day for each meeting, or each day of service, with a maximum not-to-exceed 6 days in any calendar month. This new legislation allows the District's Board of Directors, by the adoption of an Ordinance, to increase the amount of compensation per day and the number of days per month. Specifically, the daily compensation may be increased by an amount not-to-exceed 5% for each calendar year following the operative date of the last adjustment of the present compensation. The current level of $100.00 per meeting, or day of service, was established in 1986, thus the rate of 5% per annum for 15 years, a 70% increase, or a maximum not-to-exceed $170.00 per meeting or each day of service. Additionally, the Ordinance, if adopted by your Board, would authorize that compensation be paid for up to and including 6 meetings, or 6 days in any calendar month. Recognizing that the Board of Directors, over the past 3 years, has encouraged the revisiting of this subject and asking for legislative amendments, we have placed this on your Committee Agenda for review as a policy matter as to what direction to pursue, and for referral to one or more of the Standing Committees and the Board for action. For your information, the draft Ordinance i//s��//attached hereto. QQ OMAS L. WOODRUFF TLW:pI GENERAL COUNSEL rzse7ov ORDINANCE NO. OCSD AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION WHEREAS, Members of the Board of Directors are entitled, by the provisions of State law, to receive compensation for attendance at meetings, or for each day's service rendered as a Member of the Board; and WHEREAS, the last adjustment in the per diem compensation for Directors was effective January 1, 1987; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature, during the regular Session of Year 2000, adopted legislation (Senate Bill 1559), Chaptered into law (Ch. 86, Slats. 2000), effective January 1, 2001, authorizing an increase of the per diem compensation in an amount not to exceed five (5%) percent for each calendar year following the operative date of the last adjustment; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors determines that the proposed increase is reflective of increases in the cost of living related to the performance of service. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: That each Director shall receive the sum of One Hundred Seventy ($170.00) Dollars for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors, or for each day's service rendered as a Member of the Board, by request of the Board; provided that each Director shall not receive compensation for more than a total of six (6) meetings or six (6) days' service per month. Each day's service rendered as a Member of the District's Board shall be deemed to include, but not be limited to: A. Attendance as a Member of any Committee established by the District and appointed by the Chair of the District. B. Attendance at any Committee Meeting when expressly invited to attend said Committee Meeting by the Chair of the District. C. Attendance at conferences with State and/or Federal Legislators regarding District business, when approved by action of the Board of Directors. WSBS-TLW:pj:0-2:11n7=*128571 1 D. Attendance at a meeting, hearing, or conference for business of the District, when approved by action of the Board of Directors, or when designated by the General Manager, with the concurrence of the Chair, when deemed to be in the best interests of the District. Section 2: Each Director shall be reimbursed at the rate per mile established by the United States Internal Revenue Service as allowable for mileage expense deduction for use of a personal vehicle or business of the District. As said allowable rate established by the Internal Revenue Service is periodically changed, said changes in the reimbursement rate shall become effective on the first day of the month following the month in which the change is announced by the Internal Revenue Service. Section 3: When traveling on the business of the District, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course of said travel, in accordance with the following schedule: A. Commercial Transportation—Per actual invoice. B. Hotel — Room rate per actual statement for occupancy. C. Registration—Actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee. D. Ground Transportation—Asitemized. E. Telephone Service—As itemized. F. Meals. Gratuities. and Incidentals - $40.00 per day. In those cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual expenditures. Section 4: No Director shall receive pay for attendance at any meeting, such as Committee Meetings, which is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or concurrent with, a regularly-scheduled District Board Meeting. Section 5: Resolution No. 98-3 is hereby repealed. Section 6: This Ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after adoption. WSBS-TLW:pI:D.2:1 I M7100.0128571 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held the_day of 2001. Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District �J O homes L. Woodruff, General Co nsel AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: W sas-nW:pl:D-211117M*128571 3 AVERAGE # MEETINGS BENEFITS AGENCY COMPENSATION PER MONTH Health Mileage Retirement Orange County Water District $150.00 Per Diem Maximum of 10 meetings a month X X X Orange County Fire Authority $100.00 Per Diem Maximum of$300.00 per month No Benefits Orange County Transportation Authority $100.00 Per Diem Maximum of$500.00 per month X X NA Southern California Association of Governments $120.00 Per Diem Maximum of 4 meetings a month NA X NA Transportation Corridor Authority $120.00 a Meeting Maximum of 6 meetings a month No Benefits County Sanitation District of Los Angeles $100.00 Per District Maximum of 6 meetings a month No Benefits Irvine Ranch Water District $175.00 Per Diem Maximum of 10 meetings a month X X X Eastern Municipal Water District $160.00 Per Diem Maximum of 10 meetings a month X X X East Bay Municipal Utilities District $926.00 a month Minimum of 3 meetings a month X NA NA \4edonNdataltwp.dtaladmlm310UmitM2000 Mem eAngendes Benefits Chert.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To er ar' 'igigo AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Item Numbe v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: James R. Harris, Project Manager SUBJECT: SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT, JOB NO. P1-62 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Plans and Specifications for Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62; (2) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to Ark Construction Company for the Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, for an amount no to exceed $370,000. SUMMARY This project replaces the Sunflower Pump Station motors, drive reduction gears, and related electrical and control system connections. The Sunflower Drive Pump Station is critical for the proper balancing of flows between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Over the past eleven years, this station has experienced mechanical problems, requiring excessive maintenance. In 1999, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) conducted a forensic engineering study to investigate the cause of these mechanical problems. The forensic engineer recommended that the existing gearboxes be replaced with units capable of handling shock loads due to the impact of large debris entering the pump station. The plans and specifications were bid on November 21, 2000. Project Budget $585,000 Construction Budget $370,000 Engineers Estimate $370,000 Low Responsible Bid $370,000 High Bid $637,000 Number of Bids 2 N 4ry.ChlvpenWlewN A,..Ae♦Ole=O BwN I.yeMv PepW\1TMNYni t]tlx n.b.m ernve Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested for the construction contract and funds for construction management and Staff time. See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Section a Page 69') ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 'The construction budget was increased by the Board of Directors at the October 2000 Board Meeting (Item Number 12(h). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Sunflower Pump Station at Plant No. 1 consists of two 108-inch screw pumps built under Job No. P1-20, in 1989. The two screw type pumps lift raw wastewater into the Headworks. The pump system consists of a motor, gearbox, and a screw type pump. Over the last several years, the gears in the gearbox have experienced excessive wear and resulted in a major source of maintenance and mechanical failures. This has affected the ability of transporting wastewater into the Headworks Facility. In July 1999, Precision Systems Engineering (PSE) performed a forensic study of the existing pump system. The main conclusion of the study was that the gearboxes have been damaged due to shock loading from large debris being trapped in the screw pump, and the existing gearboxes should be replaced with units capable of handling the shock loading. The plans and specifications for the Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, were completed in August 2000. MSE/RW Beck Engineers, Inc performed the design. One Addendum was issued during the bid period clarifying various technical issues related to motor control, instrumentation, and required cabling. ALTERNATIVES No other cost-effective alternatives have been identified. Operation of the Sunflower Drive Pump Station is critical for the control of sewage flows into Plant No. 1 and diversion of flows to Plant No. 2. H 1rq.JlaapeMal�aN ApenEa ReryNV0.V PnaN ApeMa RepaLL\t$RMem 1]by Page 2 v CEOA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan EIR, approved on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3. Bid Summary JRH:jo:jak H1wp.Ma%agenWBoard Agenda Repoda@DDD Board Agenda Repodatl YlIDWenn 17.dw H Fw'p.Olo Mcl�iJ ApeMe Reg =002MN PpeMu R.prhkl11pJbm 11tls RedeeE: armse Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT JOB NO. P1-62 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTFrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 40,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 53,400 89% Design Staff $ 24,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 33,000 94% Construction Contract $ 200,000 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ 370,000 0% Construction Administration $ 27,000 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 $ 41,000 0% Construction Inspection $ 51,400 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 0% Contingency $ 65,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 407.400 $ 585,000 $ - $ 885.000 $ 122,000 $ 426.000 $ 548.000 $ 113,400 1 21% MwpAteleng9obs conlrects\P1-62 sunflower Pump StallontAgande Report Award Consl Contract budget[able Form Revised Aug.31,2000 i November 21, 2000 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO. 1: BID TABULATION SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT JOB NO. P1-62 Engineer's Estimate: $370,000 Construction Contract Budget: $370,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. ARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY $ 370,000 2. OLSSON CONSTRUCTORS $ 637,000 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to ARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in the bid amount of$370,000 as the lowest and best bZL ' . � 1 David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H:1vvp.tlla\engVOBS&CONTRACTSPI-62 Sunflower Drive ReplawmenOP1-62 Bid Tab.eoo Revised 05/19/98 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT JOB NO. PI-62 ARK CONSTRUCTION OLSSON CONSTRUCTORS Item Approx. City Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ - $ 20,000.00 $ $ 2 �Ump Sum $ - $ 350,000.00 $ 637,000.00' $ 370,000.DO $ 637.000.00 *Add (+)or Delete(-) $ *. . ........ $ 370,000.00 $ 637.000.00 ARK CONSTRUCTION OLSSON CONSTRUCTORS HAwpAtaXenglJOSS&CONTRACTS%P1-62 Sunflower Drive ReplacementqPI-62 Bid Summary 2.xls]Shmt2 1 of 1 11/21/2000 BOARD OF DIRECTORS nemnq oae I To Ba.or qr. 12/7A/BB AGENDA REPORT hem Numbv Ihm Nu be ie Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dennis May, Project Manager SUBJECT: DISTRIBUTION/JUNCTION BOX AND SLUDGE BELT MODIFICATIONS FOR ODOR CONTROL, JOB NO. J-71-1, AND DISTRIBUTION/JUNCTION BOX MODIFICATIONS FOR ODOR CONTROL, JOB NO. J-71-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and recommendation; and (2) Award a construction contract to Margate Construction, Inc, for the Distribution/Junction Box and Sludge Belt Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-1, and Distribution/Junction Box Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-2, for an amount not to exceed $693,000. SUMMARY Job Nos. J-71-1 and J-71-2 are being implemented to improve odor control at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The project includes covers for eight flow distribution and junction structures that are open to the atmosphere and are sources of odor. Modifications include installation of permanent covers to each structure and ventilating the foul air to existing scrubbers. The project also provides rehabilitation and replacement of existing concrete, reinforcing steel, and the protective liner. The plans and specifications were bid on November 28, 2000. Project Budget $1,156.000 Construction Budget $ 866.000 Engineers Estimate $ 866,000 Low Responsible Bid $ 693,000 High Bid $ 906,000 Number of Bids 3 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested for$693,000 in construction contract budget, ($386,000 from J-71-1 and $307,000 from J-71-2). Authorization is also being requested for$35,000 for construction administration, and $38,000 for construction inspection as indicated in the attached Budget Information Tables. ,..aonw.m,..namme�aaoa,a be.a r+e.wmmxom m.,a.o.m.ne.on.,:nanem,e aoc ae^„a Page 1 r BUDGETIMPACT 1 ® This item has been budgeted. a (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The construction budget was increased by the Board of Directors at the October 2000 Board Meeting (Item Number 12(I)). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None required. ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with the project. If this project does not move forward, the concrete junction boxes could eventually fail, interrupting critical process flows. Additionally, the Orange County Sanitation District would likely be subject to increased odor complaints from residents neighboring the treatment plants. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999 ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table Job No. J-71-1 2. Budget Information Table Job No. J-71-2 3. Bid Tabulation 4. Bid Summary DLM:jo:jak HAwp.dleNgenda\Board Agenda Reporta12000 Board Agenda Reportsg200V1ern 18.dae BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE DISTRIBUTIONMUNCTION BOX AND SLUDGE CONVEYOR BELT MODIFICATIONS FOR ODOR CONTROL JOB NO. J-71-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED -PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTTM� b. PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPEN�' BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO D/�T Project Development $ 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 3,422 66% Studies/Perrni6ing $ 1,000 $ 1000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 54 5% Consultant PSA $ 25,000 $ 30,500 $ 30,500 $ 30,500 $ 30.500 $ 30,500 100% Design Staff $ 81000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 100% Construction Contract $ 220,000 $ 508,000 $ 508,000 $ 386.000 $ 386.000 0% Construction Administration $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18.000 $ 314 2% Construction Inspection $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 0% Contingency $ 88,000 $ 82,500 $ 82,500 $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 384,000 $ 672,000 $ - $ 672,000 $ 43.500 $ 424,000 $ 467,500 $ 42,290 9% HAw .41e1engUOBS 8 CONTR CTSU.71.1W-71-1eubgelele1200.xisiDislncls BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE DISTRIBUTION/JUNCTION BOX MODIFICATIONS FOR ODOR CONTROL JOB NO. J-71-2 i ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED- PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESYIJ1171T do PROJECTRASX AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPEt,DD� BUDGET BUDGET' INCREASE j BUDGET TO DATE :'REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO:DATE TO I�Ar�tx1+ Pro'ecl Development $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 100% Studies/PermiBin Is - $ 8 $ Consultant PSA $ 18,000 $ 19,460 $ 19,460 $ 19,460 $ 19,460 $ 19.460 100% Design Staff $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9.000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 7,222 80% Construction Contract $ 150,000 $ 358.000 $ 358,000 $ 307.000 $ 307,000 0% Construction Administration $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 230 1% Construction Inspect on $ 18.000 $ 18.000 $ 18,000 $ 18.000 $ 18,000 0% Contingency $ 62,000 $ 60.540 $ 60.540 $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 276.000 $ 484,000 $ - $ 484,000 $ 30,460 $ 342.000 $ 372.460 $ 28,912 8% M: .p.EtatangUOSS S CONTNACTSU-71-2QJ-71-2 bWgetablW2W.wniDistdcta November 28, 2000 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION DISTRIBUTION AND JUNCTION BOX ODOR CONTROL MODIFICATIONS JOB NO. J-71-1 and J-71-2 Engineer's Estimate: $866,000 Construction Contract Budget: $ 866,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC $ 693,000 2. PR BURKE CORPORATION $ 724,350 3. OLSSON CONSTRUCTION $ 906,000 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the bid amount of$693,000 as the lowest and best bid. Davi ,d<<�Src � A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering H:�Wp.dta\engU09S S CONTRACTSV-714V-714 8 J-71-2 Bid TabADC Revised 05/19198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY Distribution and Junction Box Odor Control Modiflcatlons Job No. J-71-1 J-71-2 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION PR BURKE CORPORATION OLSSON CONSTRUCTORS Item Approx. City Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60.000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 688.000.00 $ 688,000.00 $ 704,350.00 $ 704.350.00 $ 846,000.00 $ 846.000.00 " ,$ 693000.00 $ 724,350.00 $ 908,000.00 'Add (+)or Delete(-) $ - ."46" l ':'lit':V.df. ,ft�iilei" i ':, ` iji iijiiil'"r'' $: 60,000.00 $ 724,350.00 $ 908,000:00 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION PR BURKE CORPORATION OLSSON CONSTRUCTORS i. HAw .dtalangUolts ConVecMXBid Doc M-71-1 &2 Bid Summary 1 Of 1 12/04/2000 G'