Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-11-15 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 8, 2000 ,hen•: NOTICE OF MEETING (714)962 2411 m.ill.g edema: BOARD OF DIRECTORS F .hmh Valle81 CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-8127 icseeed venue WEDNESDAY, November 15, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. 10844 a Avenue f untcn Valley,G4 92708-7018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue wa,wn Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies 41 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation C1ies District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anahalm are. Buena Park cypress / Fountain Valley Fullerton Garcten Grove Eoeird Se etary Huntington Beech Irvine Le Habra La Palma Los Alemit. Alemun Beach Orange P1a..nba Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Santa Ana Beal Beach Stenton Tuaun JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Villa Perk vcroa Linea SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday, November 20, 2000 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD county of Orange OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, December 6,2000 at 5:00 p.m. scalt.ry Dlacricsa PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, December 7, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. coat.Mesa Midway cry FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, December 13,2000 at 5:00 p.m. water District. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Imn.Ranch SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday, December 18,2000 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, December 20, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. -Mainuching wbrnziess Leadership in Wastewater aret Water Resource MenaAement- nm BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting December *December 20, 2000 January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 June June 27, 2001 July *July 18, 2001 August August 23, 2001 September September 26, 2001 October October 24, 2001 November *November 21, 2001 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:1wp.dM\admin1 S5 genda12000 Meeting No0ces1MN11.2.doc ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: November 15, 2000 TIME: 0 mm. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................--'/ ✓ _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHFAD................... Z — — (LARSON) ....................... BOYD............................ 7 _ (CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. 7 — — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... Gti _(r✓ — — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................= _ (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE.................. ... — (MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... — (RYAN)............................. GULLIXSON................... � — — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES....... ............... �G — (DALY)........................... ........... . - - (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN............... ... — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... GY1 6L� _ (RICE/EVANS).................. NEUGEBAUER.............. w (FRESCHI)....................... PATTERSON................. (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY................... ..... — — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI..................— — — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... — — (MAULLER)...................... SIGLER.........................�Z— — — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... 0 a-- — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... Ri — (DEBOLT)......................... SYLVIA......................... — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson Nam^ Ghirelli Kyle ✓ Gu�^�' t7""�" Lawson Ludwin Miles ✓ Ooten Tomko CL/ Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 07/19/00 H:Wq.dta\odmin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.dw SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE ICOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S /OV BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) Ba�& S HAWP.DTAV DMIN\SS\F0RMS0GN-IN FORM.DOO CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 2000 1 . ALL OF THE WORKING COMMITTEES WILL MEET ON THEIR REGULARLY SCHEDULED DAYS IN DECEMBER. OMTS WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6T"; THE PDC COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7T" AT 5 P.M. AND FAHR WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13T" AT 5 P.M. THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL BE HELD ONE WEEK EARLY ON DECEMBER 20T" BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY. AND ALL THE COMMITTEES EXCEPT STEERING WILL BE DARK IN JANUARY. 1 2. GWRS INFORMATION WORKSHOPS FOR THE PUBLIC HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED. THEY ARE: Thursday, November 16 at 7 p.m. Anaheim Community Center Assembly Hall 205 East Center Street, Anaheim Saturday, November 18 at 10 a.m. Huntington Beach Library Room C 7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach Tuesday, November 28 at 7 p.m. Fullerton Public Library Room B 353 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton AND Thursday, November 30 at 7 p.m. Irvine City Hall Irvine City Council Chambers 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine YOU'RE WELCOME TO ATTEND ONE OR ALL OF THE WORKSHOPS TO HEAR WHAT THE PUBLIC HAS TO SAY ABOUT THE PROJECT AND TO LEARN MORE ABOUT GWRS YOURSELF. 2 THERE WILL BE A SATURDAY WORKSHOP FOR THE WATER DISTRICT AND SANITATION DISTRICT BOARDS ON DECEMBER 2, BEGINNING AT 8 AM. IT WILL BE HELD IN THE WATER DISTRICT'S BOARD ROOM . I URGE THAT ALL RETURNING AND NEW DIRECTORS ATTEND THIS VERY IMPORTANT WORKSHOP. THE MOST RECENT FINANCIAL NUMBERS ABOUT THE PROJECT WILL BE PRESENTED AND THE ALTERNATIVE PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED BY IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT WILL BE AMONG THE THINGS PRESENTED AT THE WORKSHOP. REMEMBER THAT THE GO-NO GO DECISION FOR THE GROUND WATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM IS SCHEDULED FOR BOTH BOARDS ON JANUARY 24T" 3. 1 HAVE INVITED OUR ORANGE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES ELECTED TO SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON, DC AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES TO A LUNCHEON MEETING ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 14T" HERE AT THE DISTRICT. THIS WILL BE A BI- PARTISAN DISCUSSION OF LOCAL URBAN RUNOFF, 3 UPSTREAM RUNOFF, TAINTED BEACHES AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT. I WANT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OCCURRING HERE IN ORANGE COUNTY AND THAT THEY UNDERSTAND THE BIPARTISAN INTEREST IN RECEIVING STATE AND FEDERAL HELP IN FUNDING THESE SOLUTIONS. INVITED GUESTS INCLUDE: JOE DUNN, DICK ACKERMAN, LOU CORREA, LYNN DAUCHER, TOM HARMON, LORETTA SANCHEZ, CHRISTOPHER COX, DANA ROHRABACHER, KEN EMANUELS (THE LOBBYIST WORKED WITH US ON CONSOLIDATION ISSUES), AND ED ROYCE. IF ANY OF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, PLEASE CONTACT LISA LAWSON, THE DISTRICT'S COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, AT 714 593-7120. 4. PRESENT RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION a AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE JAN DEBAY TO JOIN PETER AND ME. TOM SALTARELLI HE C STIN HE CHUCK SYLVIA-WHO HAS BEEN ON THE BOARD SINCE 1976. tvl'� REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2000, AT 5 P.M. 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 25TH STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING WERE APPROVED AND I ASK THAT THEY BE RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE BOARD SECRETARY. 2. UNDER THE CHAIRMAN'S REPORT, I DISCUSSED: a. THE MEETING THAT BLAKE AND I ATTENDED WITH TONY OLIVEIRA, KINGS COUNTY SUPERVISOR. THE KINGS COUNTY BOARD IS CONSIDERING A NEW BIOSOLIDS ORDINANCE NEXT WEEK. WE WANTED TO TALK TO MR. OLIVEIRA SO THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THE SANITATION DISTRICT'S COMMITMENT TO DOING THINGS RIGHT AND THAT WE WANT AN ORDINANCE THAT IS TOUGH BUT FAIR AND ALLOWS THE LONG-TERM BENEFICIAL USE OF CLASS B BIOSOLIDS. 6 b. I ALSO DISCUSSED THE CASA LONG-RANGE PLANNING SESSION I ATTENDED AS A CASA DIRECTOR. THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION AT THE SESSION WAS TO GRANT FULL MEMBERSHIP STATUS TO THE CITIES THAT OPERATE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN CALIFORNIA. THIS WILL MEAN THAT THE CITIES AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS WILL HAVE A SINGLE AND STRONG VOICE IN SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON, DC. c. I ALSO ANNOUNCED THAT CASA'S WINTER MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PALM SPRINGS ON JANUARY 17-20. I URGE ALL OF OUR COMMITTEE CHAIRS AND OTHER INTERESTED DIRECTORS TO CONSIDER ATTENDING A CASA MEETING TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE VARIOUS TECHNICAL, FINANCIAL AND ADMINSTRATIVE CHALLENGES THAT THE SANITATION DISTRICT MUST FACE. d. WE ALSO DISCUSSED AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE DECEMBER 14 LUNCHEON MEETING WITH ORANGE COUNTY'S ELECTED SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON DC REPRESENTATIVES TO WHICH I REFERRED TO EARLIER. 3. ITEMS DISCUSSED UNDER THE GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT WERE: A. AN UPDATE WAS PROVIDED BY STAFF ON KERN COUNTY AND KINGS COUNTY BIOSOLIDS ISSUES. B. STAFF UPDATED THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF THE GWRS PROJECT. THE JOINT COORDINATION COMMITTEE MEETS NEXT MONDAY NIGHT TO DISCUSS FINANCIAL AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES. C. THE COMMITTEE RECEIVED AN UPDATE ON THE SARI LINE RELOCATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES. D. BLAKE ANDERSON REPORTED ON THE 2-1/2 DAY EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RETREAT HELD LAST WEEK TO DISCUSS THE FIVE-YEAR BUSINESS AND STAFFING PLAN. HE REPORTED THAT THE a PLAN WILL MOVE THROUGH THE BOARD COMMITTEES ON ITS WAY TO THE FEBRUARY 2001 BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL. E. SENATE BILL 1559 WAS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR IN JULY AND WILL BE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1 , 2001 . THIS BILL ALLOWS SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION TO BE INCREASED BY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS BOARD HAS NOT HAD AN INCREASE SINCE 1986. OUR PRESENT COMPENSATION IS $100 PER MEETING AND IS LIMITED TO 6 MEETINGS PER MONTH. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED STAFF TO BRING THE ISSUE THROUGH THE COMMITTEE IN THE MONTH OF e-,) ON ITS WAY TO THE FULL BOARD'S CONSIDERATION N IQ F. BOB GHIRELLI BRIEFED THE COMMITTEE ON THE RESULTS OF A NEW TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE s HUNTINGTON BEACH BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION PROBLEMS THAT WILL BE RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC AND ANNOUNCED IN A FORMAL PRESS CONFERENCE TOMORROW. BOB PROVIDED THE COMMITTEE WITH THE INFORMATION HE WILL PRESENT TO THE BOARD UNDER THE GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT, WHICH IS THE NEXT ITEM ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA. 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS INCLUDED: A. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR REVIEW BY THE COMMITTEES IN DECEMBER WERE REVIEWED. 5. (J ' CONFIRM WITH PAU E COMMITTEE MET IN CLOSED S N T ONFER WITH GENERAL COUNSEL ON E CRO THROP CLAIM. THERE WERE REPORTABLE ACTIONS KEN.) 10 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, November 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 8, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair Shawn Boyd John M. Gull'ocson Shirley McCracken Joy L. Neugebauer STAFF PRESENT: James W. Silva Peer Swan Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jan Debay, Past Board Chair David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources OTHERS PRESENT: Mike White, Controller Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Collins, Human Resources Analyst Don Hughes Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Tom Dawes Analyst Bob Gaggle Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Ryal Wheeler Manager Mike Moreland Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Greg Giles Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. v Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 November 8, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the October 11,2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meetings. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that one of the District's fire, flood and earthquake insurance carriers, Reliance Insurance Company, has been down-graded to Best rating "C". Reliance has 12 '1/2% of the coverage. To replace the coverage with a company rated "A"would cost an additional $166,000 in premium. Robert Driver, the District's broker, and staff recommend that the District not pay the additional premium as the District would have a priority claim on any bankruptcy proceedings if Reliance fails to pay any claims. Mr. Streed then reported on opportunities with long-tern investment agreements on debt service reserve funds. It was recommended that staff prepare a written report for the next committee meeting outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the long-tens agreements. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources referred the Directors to charts distributed to them that evening per Director Gullixson's request on the cost of salaries and benefits to all employees, as well as the impact of increased employee benefits/wages to the user fee rates. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on the legislative Bill, recently enacted, regarding increasing Directors' compensation for attendance at meetings or for each day's service for the District. This issue will be placed on the Steering Committee agenda for information as the first step towards adopting the necessary Ordinance as previously directed by the Board. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Director McCracken requested Item 10(e) be pulled for discussion. a. FAHR0Ml: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2000. b. FAHROO-82: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR00-83: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of October 25, 2000. w ` Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 November 8, 2000 it. FAHR00-84: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 2000. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a) through (d) under Consent Calendar. e. FAHROO-91: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. Director McCracken submitted written questions from the City of Anaheim Treasurer to Gary Streed, Director of Finance, with regard to the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report. It was requested the submitted questions and staffs response to the questions be included as an informational item in next month's committee package. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR00-85: Recommend to Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD OD- Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Create Limited Term contract Engineer classification at pay range E13 ($67,122-$94,929); (2) Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068- $70,847); and (3) Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99/00 budget at a proposed cost of$5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHROO.86: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHROO-87: Leadership Training for Management Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Analyst, gave a brief report on the leadership training program for management. 0 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 November 8, 2000 b. FAHR00-88: Not used C. FAHR00-89 Groundwater Replenishment System Director Peer Swan gave a slide presentation and overview of the Groundwater Replenishment System project(GWRS). He also gave a brief presentation of suggested opportunities he is recommending to reduce project implementation risks and costs through a three-phase process. d. FAHR00-90 US EPA's proposed regulations on Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) of sanitary sewer systems Nick Arhontes spoke to the Directors regarding new EPA regulations that will be published for final public comment that have significant financial impacts on all public agencies that own sanitary sewer systems. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for December 13, 2000 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session: (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: P nny M. I I FAHR Com Ntee Sec ary HA1PEbYp W MulmlflONtl FAHFMW Gcc Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 1 of: Step 1 : Plan vacation. 11,11 lt. Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports Tuesday, November 14,2000I go Print this.story Politic Travel Commentary Entertainment Classibeds Shopping MUSIC,movies an lobs.homes.bars. Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into TV.restaurants rentals Beverage „ • a Two O.C. agencies back the$352-million project,which will be the region's largest. Public workshops are set. Communities TOP STORIES By DAVID REYES,Times Staff Writer • Median Home. Plunk Down.$284.000 • Water Plan Would Turn SSQwa9sin o Bweraag • Spill Fouts Part of Bay in Newport Just as technology has yielded everything from fast food to MORE cellular phones, it may soon produce something more basic to News sports CalendaU..iygt Orange County residents: changing sewage and sink waste into Business IiGtLScho Dol dome WB drinking water. Commentary Sports Safety Zone For several years, water-filtration companies have been trying to prove to the Orange County Water District that their auction. uct.uaien.boe6 plane o beds Fine r RV hpV oar rental.Place an Ad vet.me shot", trying of cleaning waste water is the best. . o Now two agencies--the water district and the neighboring L.A.Times Subscription Services Subscribe,Change of Orange County Sanitation District--are poised in January to Address,Vacation Stops.Suspend Delivery,College Discount,Gift Subscriptions.Mau Subwapnons.FAQ approve a$352-million project that will pump recycled, heavily cleaned sewage water into the county's huge, underground Print Edition Advertisements See this week's ads aquifer by 2004. "This project will generate a lot of brand-new water that OTHER EDITIONS print i otherwise just goes out to the ocean," said Philip L. Anthony, a , , Community Orange County Valley Ventura County. National,Papers water district board member at ajoint water-sanitation district trrtnaaaanwap meeting Monday. "It's absolutely essential for our future." Books Columnists Crossword The project is critical for keeping imported water at existing Food Education Horoscope levels, officials said, and keeping overall water costs down for Health Obituaries Lottery Highway 1 Religion Reading by 9 the county. About 71,600 acre feet a year will be cleansed from Real Estate Science Traffic waste water--the equivalent of flooding a football field with a So.Cal. Living Special Reports Weather column of water 13 1/2 miles high. Sunday Opinion Times Poll SITE MAP Plans call for the water district,located in Fountain Valley, Luxurysquane.eom to pump in treated waste water from the sanitation district, then send it through a microfiltration system. About 60%of the Baume a Mercier . purified water will be shipped by underground pipeline from the district's facility to the Kraemer Basin in Anaheim. The remainder will be pumped into the ground near the coast to help dilute saltwater in an underground aquifer. Fir 'f. t as low as Water experts have said the Orange County project will be o • one of the largest microfiltration systems in California. In Hotels Aware addition to filtration, the system will use reverse osmosis, VISA �, oP o Nrm ckeges essentially a two-part filtering process, and then sterilize the APR-9.9 ®- with ultraviolet light. Minerals would be added to the file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/200( Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 2 of 2 010a" ONGOING APa (fJtraveisCapexorrf water to prevent concrete and iron in pipes from leaching into it. Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer for the Regional Water Quality Control Board, said that although there are other water recycling projects in the region, there's "nothing even remotely" close in size involving direct use of recycled waste water into an aquifer. Without the project, the county would have to rely even more on water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California, sources that are both expensive and increasingly restricted for environmental reasons, said Ron Wildermuth,a water district spokesman. The project will primarily serve north Orange County,which relies on ground water for three-quarters of its supply. South County, which has no aquifer, imports 100%of its water, Wildermuth said. Funding totaling$56 million has already been raised. The two agencies also will seek state and federal grants and loans. To increase the public's awareness, four community workshops will be held starting Thursday at 7 p.m. at the Community Center, 250 E. Center St.,Anaheim. The other workshops include: Huntington Beach at the Central Library and Cultural Center, Room D, 7111 Talbert Ave., Saturday, 10 a.m.;the Fullerton Public Library, Room B, 353 West Commonwealth Ave.,Nov. 28, 7 p.m.; and at the Irvine City Council Chambers, 1 Civic Center Plaza,Nov. 30, 7 p.m. Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: Sewage Treatment Plants, Water Treatment Plants, Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Water District, Orange County -Public Works. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES / as Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times News. Business Sports *"Click lick fur permission to reprint (PR_C#. 1.528,000109033) Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music.movies,an. lobs.homes.cars, N,restaurants rentals .,a file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/2000 e , BOARD OF DIRECTORS Nee ux ron a. I 6/00 12/20/60 AGENDA REPORT teem Numea+ Ieem Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Barbara Collins, Senior 08M Analyst SUBJECT: AWARD OF FERRIC CHLORIDE CONTRACT, SPECIFICATION NO. C-147 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-039 with Kemiron Pacific, Inc., ending November 30, 2000, providing for an increase of$275,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,400,368.75; and (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award a contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc. at a unit price of$316.79 including sales tax and delivery, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $2,400,368.75. SUMMARY Ferric chloride is used in the wastewater treatment facilities as a coagulant to enhance settling in the primary processes and for sulfide control in the digester gas. The treatment plants use an estimated 7500 dry tons of chemicals each year. Fourteen vendors received request for bids. Five did not respond and seven vendors did not bid. Bids were received from two vendors; the bids ranged from $318.94/ton to $316.79/ton. (See attached bid tabulation.) Based on the lowest bid unit cost, the estimated annual use is$2,375,925. In addition to seeking approval of a new contract, staff is requesting an increase to the current contract that ends November 30, 2000. The treatment facilities have seen an increased demand for chemical resulting from flow increases such as urban runoff diversions and higher than anticipated flows from Santa Ana Watershed Protection Authority, among others. For example, urban runoff from the Santa Ana River and start- up flows from a SAWPA desalter project were diverted into the District system during the summer months. The current contract, also with Kemiron, in the amount of $2,125,368.75 must be increased by $275,000 in order to cover increased chemical demand in the treatment plant. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The current contract for the chemical expires November 30, 2000. The lowest bid for the new contract period is$316.79 per dry ton, an 11.8% increase over the current contract cost. The bid prices were higher than projected during the budget process M,avdmlgma� W ngeka Aeew =aaam Agenda Re %11"m,16d- Page and it is anticipated that expenditures will exceed budget amounts. The chemical cost increase results from increases in the cost of chlorine, one of the chemicals used to make ferric chloride, as well as increases in trucking resulting from higher fuel prices. District staff budgeted $ 2,050,000 for this fiscal year. Based on the bid prices, staff estimates the District will spend $ 325,395 over budget amount. Staff is currently experimenting with alternative chemical in order to reduce expenditures and contain costs. Budget amounts for next fiscal year will be adjusted accordingly. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS Bid Tabulation Sheet H�ft. eenJ�WAgenm R.W.UCNB-M iae: Paget BID PRICE TABULATION PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE SPECIFICATION NO. C-147 Bid Opening: October 17, 2000 Bidder Total Delivered Price per dry ton Kemiron Pacific Inc. (Kemwater) $316.79 Beta Control Systems $318.94 Commerce Chemical Company NO BID Eaglebrook, Inc. NO BID GW International(Westem States Chemical) NO BID Jones Chemical NO BID Pressure Vessel Service, Inc. (Basic Chemical Solutions) NO BID Sierra Chemical Company NO BID US Filter NO BID All Pure Chemical Company(Pioneer) NO RESPONSE Ashland Specialty Chemicals NO RESPONSE Draw Industrial Division Holchem, Inc. NO RESPONSE US Filter(Corporate HQs) NO RESPONSE Van Waters&Rogers NO RESPONSE We have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. We, therefore, recommend award to KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. in the bid amount of$316.79 as the lowest and best bid. arc Dubois, C.P.M. Contracts!Purchasing Manager /U 17- ck) Date H%wp Eta\fin@3olBids&ContmdSIA-V BOARD AWARD BIds1Bo.M C bidMC-147 Feft ChloEda\BID PRICE TABULATION 2.d. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation �. j/AlL'�/�District to be held on /.S� , 20 DJW,as duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 9f, 202). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ?"'r day of 20A). Penny M. Kyle ecreta Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District \\RADON\DATA1\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BB\FORMB1AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, November 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 8, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair Shawn Boyd John M. Gullixson Shirley McCracken Joy L. Neugebauer STAFF PRESENT: James W. Silva Peer Swan Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jan Debay, Past Board Chair David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources OTHERS PRESENT: Mike White, Controller Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Collins, Human Resources Analyst Don Hughes Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Tom Dawes Analyst Bob Geggie Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Ryai Wheeler Manager Mike Moreland Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Greg Giles Penny Kyle,Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ;d Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 November 8, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the October 11, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meetings. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that one of the District's fire, flood and earthquake insurance carriers, Reliance Insurance Company, has been down-graded to Best rating "C". Reliance has 12 %% of the coverage. To replace the coverage with a company rated "A"would cost an additional $166,000 in premium. Robert Driver, the District's broker, and staff recommend that the District not pay the additional premium as the District would have a priority claim on any bankruptcy proceedings if Reliance fails to pay any claims. Mr. Streed then reported on opportunities with long-term investment agreements on debt service reserve funds. It was recommended that staff prepare a written report for the next committee meeting outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the long-term agreements. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources referred the Directors to charts distributed to them that evening per Director Gullixson's request on the cost of salaries and benefits to all employees, as well as the impact of increased employee benefits/wages to the user fee rates. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on the legislative Bill, recently enacted, regarding increasing Directors' compensation for attendance at meetings or for each days service for the District. This issue will be placed on the Steering Committee agenda for information as the first step towards adopting the necessary Ordinance as previously directed by the Board. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Director McCracken requested Item 10(e) be pulled for discussion. a. FAHR00-81: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2000. b. FAHR00-82: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR00-83: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of October 25,2000. ., Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 November 8, 2000 d. FAHROO-84: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 2000. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duty carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (d) under Consent Calendar. e. FAHRo0.91: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. Director McCracken submitted written questions from the City of Anaheim Treasurer to Gary Streed, Director of Finance,with regard to the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report. It was requested the submitted questions and staffs response to the questions be included as an informational item in next month's committee package. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR00-85: Recommend to Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Create Limited Tenn contract Engineer dassifiration at pay range E13 ($67,122-$94,929); (2) Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068- $70,847); and (3) Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99100 budget at a proposed cost of$5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHROO-86: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHROO-87: Leadership Training for Management Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Analyst, gave a brief report on the leadership training program for management. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 November 8, 2000 b. FAHR00-88: Not used C. FAHR00-89 Groundwater Replenishment System Director Peer Swan gave a slide presentation and overview of the Groundwater Replenishment System project (GWRS). He also gave a brief presentation of suggested opportunities he is recommending to reduce project implementation risks and costs through a three-phase process. d. FAHR00-90 US EPA's proposed regulations on Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) of sanitary sewer systems Nick Arhontes spoke to the Directors regarding new EPA regulations that will be published for final public comment that have significant financial impacts on all public agencies that own sanitary sewer systems. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for December 13, 2000 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: qn 7 Pbn r/ ny M. FAHR Com Kph, Se ary ,�u�osoo�uw�m.ez Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 1 of: Ste is Plan vacation. t1Ilr:(Mr Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business $ports Tuesday,November 14,20001 a.Print this story Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopf nn mpsia.tnovas.ail. lobs.hom a3:cars, TV,re Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into slep(anle rem_ Beverage a Two O.C. agencies back the$352-million project,which will be the region's largest. Public workshops are set. Communities TOP STORIES By DAVID REYES.Times Staff Wdkr • Median Home:Plynk Qow,n3284 000 •Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage • 5p1I1.FFyuIBeart of Bay_n Newport Just as technology has yielded everything from fast food to MORE cellular phones, it may soon produce something more basic to News Sports Calendar Live! Orange County residents: changing sewage Bud sink waste into Busines High School Home Design drinking water. Cornnenttary SP.ons safetyZone For several years, water-filtration companies have been Classifieds Find a home-,car,ranaI.h.M,merchandise, trying to prove to the Orange County Water District that their aucliori.poplane or RV Place an,Ad method of cleaning waste water is the best. Now two agencies--the water district and the neighboring L.A.Times Subscription Services Subscribe,Cha a or Orange County Sanitation District--are poised in January to Address,Vacation Stops,Suu nd_DelW,Callege_Diswunt.Gift Subscriptions.Mail S.4vAp as,FAQ approve a$352-million project that will pump recycled,heavily cleaned sewage water into the county's huge, underground Print Edition Advertisements See Nis week's ads aquifer by 2004. OTHER EDITIONS "This project will generate a lot of brand-new water that Print Edition,orange county.Valley.Ventura county. National, otherwise just goes out to the ocean," said Philip L.Anthony, a Community Papers water district board member at a joint water-sanitation district Mcaasiaum;a meeting Monday. "It's absolutely essential for our future." Books Columnists Crossword The project is critical for keeping imported water at existing Food Education Horoscope levels,officials said, and keeping overall water costs down for Health ighw Obituaries Lottery the coup About 71,600 acre feet a year will be cleansed from Highway 1 Religion Reading by 9 ty. y Real Estate Science Traffic waste water--the equivalent of flooding a football field with a So Cal.Living Special Reports Weather Column of water 13 1/2 miles high. Sunday Opinion Times Poll SITE MAP Plans call for the water district,located in Fountain Valley, Luxurysquane.Com to pump in treated waste water from the sanitation district, then send it through a microfiltration system. About 60%of the purified water will be shipped by underground pipeline from the Baume 8 Mercier . district's facility to the Kraemer Basin in Anaheim. The remainder will be pumped into the ground new the coast to help dilute saltwater in an underground aquifer. A aslowasWater experts have said the Orange County project will be „ n aone of the largest microfiltration systems in California. In J2 9PR Hotels Hiner¢ addition to filtration,the system will use reverse osmosis, on firm ckages essentially a two-part filtering process, and then sterilize the ,9% -__ _,_____ water with ultraviolet light. Minerals would be added to the file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Tom Sewage Into Bevemge.htm 31/15/200( Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 2 of 2 OW"" ONGOING APR 07I dVeISCaPLAX rl water to prevent concrete and iron in pipes from leaching into it. Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer for the Regional Water Quality Control Board, said that although there are other water recycling projects in the region, there's "nothing even remotely" close in size involving direct use of recycled waste water into an aquifer. Without the project, the county would have to rely even more on water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California, sources that are both expensive and increasingly restricted for environmental reasons, said Ron Wildermuth,a water district spokesman. The project will primarily serve north Orange County,which relies on ground water for three-quarters of its supply. South County, which has no aquifer, imports 100%of its water, Wildermuth said. Funding totaling$56 million has already been raised. The two agencies also will seek state and federal grants and loans. To increase the public's awareness, four community workshops will be held starting Thursday at 7 p.m. at the Community Center,250 E. Center St., Anaheim. The other workshops include: Huntington Beach at the Central Library and Cultural Center,Room D, 7111 Talbert Ave., Saturday, 10 a.m.; the Fullerton Public Library,Room B,353 West Commonwealth Ave.,Nov. 28,7 p.m.; and at the Irvine City Council Chambers, I Civic Center Plaza,Nov. 30, 7 p.m. b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: Sewage Treatment Plants, Water Treatment Plants, Orange County Sanitation Districts,Orange County Water District, Orange County-Public Works. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES 1 Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times News Business Sports _.Click for.permission to reprint (PRCI! 1.52$000109033J Politics Travel Commentan Entertainment Classifieds Shopping music,movies,art. jobs,hori cars. TV,restaurants rentals Something fresh, bold and exciting from the Los Angeles Times Test Kitchie n. I! file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/2000 Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page I of: r Step I : Plan vacation. nm:Ots Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports Tuesday,November 14,2000149 Print this story Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifiable Shopping m°s'n m°vieA.in. job*.hopes.ca3, Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into TV.resta cards Banal Beverage IM a Two O.C. agencies back the $352-million project, which will be the region's largest. Public workshops we set. Communities TOP STORIES By OAVID REYES,Times Staawi ter • Median Home: Plunk Down$284 0.00 • Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage • Spill Fouls Peg of Bay in Newport Just as technology has yielded everything from fast food to MORE cellular phones, it may soon produce something more basic to News Sys. Calendar Liv¢! Orange County residents: changing sewage and sink waste into BuB sines High School Home D� Winking water. CQmmenta Sports Safety zone. For several years,water-filtration companies have been Classifieds Fig a home.car,rental.iob. xt,merchandise. trying to prove to the Orange County Water District that their auction.po uprane or RV Place an Ad method of cleaning waste water is the best. Now two agencies--the water district and the neighboring L.A.Times Subscription Services Subscribe.Change of Orange County Sanitation District--are poised in January to Address.Vacation Stops,Suspend Delivery,College Discount.Gift Subscriptions,Mail Subscriptior,s,FAQ approve a$352-million project that will pump recycled,heavily cleaned sewage water into the county's huge,underground Print Edition Advertisements See this week's atls aquifer by 2004. OTHER EDITIONS "This project will generate a lot of brand-new water that Print Edition,Orange County,Valley.Ventura County.National, otherwise just goes out to the ocean," said Philip L. Anthony,a Community Papers water district board member at a joint water-sanitation district lamas aannp meeting Monday. "it's absolutely essential for our future." Books Columnists Crossword The project is critical for keeping imported water at existing Food Education Horoscope levels,officials said,and keeping overall water costs down for Health Obituaries Lottery the coup About 71,600 acre feet a year will be cleansed from Highway 1 Religion Reading by 9 tyr• y Real Estate Science Traffic waste water--the equivalent of flooding a football field with a So.Cal.Living Special Reports weather column of water 13 1/2 miles high. Sunday Opinion Times Poll SITE MAP Plans call for the water district, located in Fountain Valley, LuxuryScluare.Com to pump in treated waste water from the Sanitation district, then send it through a microfiltration system. About 60%of the purified water will be shipped by underground pipeline from the Baume s Mercier district's facility to the Kraemer Basin in Anaheim. The remainder will be pumped into the ground near the coast to help dilute saltwater in an underground aquifer. as low as Water experts have said the Orange County project will be 2.9 one of the largest microfiltration systems in California. In �� IMrb APB Hotels Arfare addition to filtration,the system will use reverse osmosis, v154s °R Airht rt filtering ckages essentially a two-paltering process, and then sterilize the 9 with ultraviolet light. Minerals would be added to the file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/200t Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 2 of y ONGOING APR ra_Vrravelscape,rom water to prevent concrete and iron in pipes from leaching into it. Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer for the Regional Water Quality Control Board, said that although there are other water recycling projects in the region, there's "nothing even remotely" close in size involving direct use of recycled waste water into an aquifer. Without the project, the county would have to rely even more on water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California, sources that are both expensive and increasingly restricted for environmental reasons, said Ron Wildermuth,a water district spokesman. The project will primarily serve north Orange County,which relies on ground water for three-quarters of its supply. South County,which has no aquifer, imports 100%of its water, Wildermuth said. Funding totaling$56 million has already been raised. The two agencies also will seek state and federal grants and loans. To increase the public's awareness, four community workshops will be held starting Thursday at 7 p.m. at the Community Center,250 E. Center St.,Anaheim. The other workshops include: Huntington Beach at the Central Library and Cultural Center,Room D,7111 Talbert Ave., Saturday, 10 a.m.;the Fullerton Public Library, Room B, 353 West Commonwealth Ave.,Nov. 28, 7 p.m.;and at the Irvine City Council Chambers, 1 Civic Center Plaza,Nov. 30, 7 p.m. b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: Sewage Treatment Plants, Water Treatment Plants Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Water District, Orange County- Public Works. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES 4 Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times News Business Sports G �.,Click forpennission to reprint (PRC# 1.528.00010903) Politics Travel COmmerl Entertainment Classifieds Shopping MUS'e.movies.art, jobs.horns.cars. T.`N,r"laurants rentals Something fresh, bold and exciting from the Los Angeles Times Test Kitchen, file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/200( Water Pfan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page I of ( Step ] : Plan vacation. � 1 t1al;(e:: Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Sports Tuesday,November 14,20001 & Fri nithis story Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Clage_lfleda Shopping music,moviea.ad, jobs.Wood; care, Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into TV.restaurants (antal5 Beverage ,; • � Ikq a Two O.C. agencies back the$352-million project,which will be the region's largest. Public workshops are set. Communities TOP STORIES By DWID REYES,notes Staff Willer • MedlanHorl luok.Down_$211_4 000 • Water Plan Would Tun Sawacre Into B v raae • WILE t[ls Pe_rt-of Bay in Newport Just as technology has yielded everything from fast food to MORE cellular phones, it may soon produce something more basic to Clews Sports Caleardar-Livvel Orange County residents: changing sewage and sink waste into Business H'oh School Home Design dreg water. Commentary sports Safety zone For several years,water-filtration companies have been Clilisslaede Find a home,par anal.L,Pon,merchandise, trying to prove to the Orange County Water District that their auction,boa[,plane or RV Place an Ad method of cleaning waste water is the best. Now two agencies--the water district and the neighboring L.A.Times Subscription Services subscribe,chime of Orange County Sanitation District--are poised in January to Address,Vacalion—Sjopa,$aspendpellYBD(.Coilege_DiscouN.Gill Subscriptions MaA�u_lr�,g(Iptlpas FAQ approve a$352-million project that will pump recycled,heavily cleaned sewage water into the county's huge, underground Print Edition Advertisements See this week's ad. aquifer by 2004. "This project will generate a lot of brand-new water that OTHER EDITIONS Print i otherwise just goes out to the ocean," said Philip L. Anthony,a Community Orange County,Valley,Ventura County,National, Papers water district board member at ajoin[water-sanitation district [aluuatau(u(u meeting Monday. "It's absolutely essential for our future." Books columnists Crossword The project is critical for keeping imported water at existing Food Education Horoscope levels,officials said, and keeping overall water costs down for Health Obituaries Lottery Reading the county. About 71,600 acre feet a year will be cleansed from Highway i Religion Reading by 9 ty� y Real Estate science Traffic waste water--the equivalent of flooding a football field with a So Col.Lying Special Reports Weather column of water 13 1/2 miles high. Sunday Opinion Times Poll SITE MAP Plans call for the water district, located in Fountain Valley, Luxurysquam.Com to pump in treated waste water from the sanitation district, then send it through a microffltration system. About 60%of the Baume a Mercier — purified water will be shipped by underground pipeline from the district's facility to the Kraemer Basin in Anaheim. The remainder will be pumped into the ground near the coast to help dilute saltwater in an underground aquifer. Water experts have said the Orange County project will be one of the largest microfiltralion systems in California. In iFk!�— � 9 DAPR Hotels Arlen addition to filtration,the system will use reverse osmosis, IM VISA OR AirM ckeges essentially a two-part filtering process,and then sterilize the 9% _ water with ultraviolet light. Minerals would be added to the file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.lrtm 31/15/200( Water clan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage Page 2 of 2 C%Wa• onaarto APa 0W 1raM5Capecom water to prevent concrete and iron in pipes from leaching into it. Kurt Berchtold, assistant executive officer for the Regional Water Quality Control Board, said that although there are other water recycling projects in the region,there's "nothing even remotely" close in size involving direct use of recycled waste water into an aquifer. Without the project, the county would have to rely even more on water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California, sources that are both expensive and increasingly restricted for environmental reasons, said Ron Wildermuth,a water district spokesman. The project will primarily serve north Orange County,which relies on ground water for three-quarters of its supply. South County, which has no aquifer, imports 100% of its water, Wildermuth said. Funding totaling$56 million has already been raised. The two agencies also will seek state and federal grants and loans. To increase the public's awareness, four community workshops will be held starting Thursday at 7 p.m. at the Community Center,250 E. Center St.,Anaheim.The other workshops include: Huntington Beach at the Central Library and Cultural Center, Room D, 7111 Talbert Ave., Saturday, 10 a.m.;the Fullerton Public Library, Room B, 353 West Commonwealth Ave.,Nov. 28, 7 p.m.; and at the Irvine City Council Chambers, 1 Civic Center Plaza,Nov. 30, 7 p.m. b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: Sewage Treatment Plants, Water Treatment Plants Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Water District, Orange County- Public Works. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES I Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times News Business sports � ,.r Click fgrpennission to reprint(PRC# 1.528.000109033) Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping mesic,movies,art lobs homse cars. TV,restaurants rentals Something fresh, hold and exciting from the Los Angeles Times Test Kitchen. file://C:\TEMP\Water Plan Would Turn Sewage Into Beverage.htm 11/15/200C g, ,,, / ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT t November 8, 2000 platy: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members wiling warn„,; of the Board of Directors P.O. Box 9127 �uM9z 2e 8127 Subject: Board Letter .a..t.aa:...: 101"Ellis Avenue Xntaln Valle,.cA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92708 7018 information on any of the items, please call me. Huntington Beach Closure Investigation: Two Technical Reviews Age Maw., Following the events of summer 1999 at Huntington Beach, OCSD requested the e University of Southern California (USC) Sea Grant Program to convene an citing independent review of the scientific studies and management actions that were 1.1.1. undertaken during and subsequent to the 1999 closure incident. The 10-member area panel met over several days in late February-early March of this year and reported Buena Perk the preliminary results of their work at a public workshop on March 1. USC Sea G�PreB Faun[am U.Ifay Grant has just published the final report titled Huntington Beach Closure Paflartan Investigation: Technical Review, October 2000 that summarizes the findings of the Garden Gr.. technical review panel. A copy of the report is attached. Huntington Beech Irvine Le Habra The report concludes that leaky sewer pipes and OCSD's offshore ouffall are unlikely Le Palma Las sources of the beach contamination and that the Talbert channel storm drain system Beach Newporrtt Baech was the most likely source of bacterial contamination along Huntington Beach in Plorange 1999. The report goes on to recommend a series of further studies that should be sent.Ana conducted. Many of these 1999 recommendations were incorporated into the work of Beef Beach the UCl/Koinex/URS Greiner consulting team activities conducted during the summer Stanton of 2000 in the continuing search for the source of the contamination. Finally, the Ville Park report outlines some of the lessons that the panel felt had application to similar Yorba Linda events occurring at other locations. I encourage you to pay particular attention to this county of Orange section of the report and to share the lessons learned with your city staffs who are involved in water quality issues. 9enitary Districts As a follow up to the work of the USC Sea Grant panel, another technical review of caste Cite Midwayy City the Huntington Beach work is scheduled to occur this month. They will review the summer of 2000 research work. This second panel, created by the National Water Water Olstrlats Research Institute (NW RI), will meet in mid-November to review the work conducted 1,.e Ranch by the agencies and consultants after the summer of 1999. A preliminary report from that group is slated to be released to the public in mid-November and a final report is expected in December. 'Maintaining world-Class Leadership in wastewater and water Resource Management Board of Directors Page 2 November 8, 2000 Groundwater Replenishment System: Public Information Program Update Outreach to Orange County Businesses Letters to 150 larger Orange County-based businesses were mailed in September as part of the second phase of the business outreach plan. (A similar mailing was conducted earlier this year.) Follow-up telephone calls were made to each of these businesses in October to ensure the letters were received. As a result, we received 20 requests for either a tour of Water Factory 21 or a presentation on the Groundwater Replenishment System. Outreach to Homeowners Associations Letters were mailed to approximately 1,500 homeowners associations and addressed to individuals on the association boards, rather than management companies, as one of our goals was to reach actual residents. The letters offered presentations to residents and/or articles for their newsletters. Two articles will be mailed to those associations requesting information --the first article is longer and goes into more detail about the GW RS project; the second article is short and contains the same information printed on the workshop postcard. We have received requests for articles. Workshop Postcard We are printing 56,000 postcards advertising the November GW RS public workshops. 50,000 were mailed to high-propensity voters, 3,500 to those on the GW RS newsletter distribution list. Extra copies of the postcard were printed for general distribution to OCWD and OCSD employees, cities within the service area, public information officers from service area water agencies, and friends and neighbors. Public Workshops Anaheim -Thursday, Nov. 16, 7 p.m. Community Center Assembly Hall 250 East Center Street Huntington Beach -Saturday, Nov. 18, 10 a.m. Central Library and Cultural Center, Room D 7111 Talbert Avenue Fullerton -Tuesday, Nov. 28, 7 p.m. Fullerton Public Library, Room B 353 West Commonwealth Avenue r Board of Directors Page 3 November 8, 2000 Irvine-Thursday, Nov. 30, 7 p.m. Irvine City Council Chambers 1 Civic Center Plaza Newspaper Advertising Newspaper ads announcing the workshops will be placed in the Times, Register and the community newspapers serving Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Fullerton,and Irvine. Outreach to the Medical Community A letter was sent to 1,800 doctors on the Orange County Medical Association mailing list explaining the GWRS project and offering meetings to brief them on the project. Biosolids: Kings County Update Kings County Board of Supervisors (Supervisors) met on October 31, 2000 to listen to support or concerns regarding their Draft Biosolids land Application Ordinance that has been circulated. The Kings County Farm Bureau (Farm Bureau)asked for a continuance so that the Bureau's board could reach consensus on their position on the Ordinance. The Supervisors said they would make a decision at their November 21, 2000 meeting with or without the Bureau's position. The Farm Bureau met on November 2, 2000 to discuss the merits of the Ordinance and to try and reach consensus. Present at the meeting were Kings County Supervisor Rachford representing his client, Pat McCarthy,who was also present, local farmers, representatives of the Kings County Farm Bureau Board, and District's staff. Farm Bureau members did not dispute the science supporting biosolids recycling but questioned the potential for adverse impacts to their industry that may result from public perception concerns. There were allegations that municipalities who purchase land do so in order to dump their biosolids rather than use good farming practices and are not good stewards of the land. It was also pointed out by Supervisor Rachford that the municipalities want to get out of being regulated by the county as evidenced by the suit filed over the Kem County Ordinance and the biosolids preemption legislation that was attempted earlier in the year. OCSD staff testified that we value the land that we have purchased, want it to be farmed correctly and that we welcome the county regulatory oversight. OCSD staff does not expect the Farm Bureau to support an ordinance that would allow land application of Class B biosolids, except perhaps at Mr. McCarthy's site in Kings County through a grandfathering provision. It does appear that the Bureau will support the use of Class A Exceptional Quality(EQ) biosolids. Board of Directors Page 4 November 8, 2000 Biosolids: Fresno County Ordinance The Fresno County staff held a meeting on the evening of November 1, 2000 to discuss their draft ordinance for the use and disposal of biosolids. This ordinance will allow the use of Class B biosolids generated within the county. However, Class B biosolids generated outside the county would not be allowed. OCSD staff(also representing CASA and Tri-TAC) presented, and submitted in writing, technical arguments in support of Class B biosolids generated outside the county. Santa Ana River Interceptor Line Relocation Project Design work is in progress to relocate the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) pipeline relocation. Currently, a portion of the SARI line is located in the bed of the Santa Ana River and is compromised due to the eroding riverbed, which covers the line. In some areas, there is only 3-6 feet of cover over the SARI line. Approximately four miles of the existing pipeline located between Savi Ranch Shopping Center and the Orange County/San Bernardino County line will be relocated. The line will be relocated outside the Santa Ana River floodplain along La Palma Avenue and the railroad between Weir Canyon Road and the Green River Golf Course,for a total length of approximately 4.5 miles. Construction of the SARI relocation is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2001 and to be completed by October 2003. The SARI portion located in the river will be abandoned in the summer of 2004. The design work is proceeding according to the currently adopted project schedule. During the recently completed right-of-way mapping effort, it became apparent that the proposed alignment for the line will cross through the back of 69 residential lots. During a field visit, staff noticed that the back portions of these lots are separated from the actual house pads by backyards and slopes and fences or block walls. Other entities, such as the Orange County Flood Control District and Sprint, already have easements crossing the properties in question. Nevertheless, this is a complication that we had not contemplated, but will handle. Our consultant, Brown and Caldwell, has performed some geotechnical work to determine design constraints for the pipeline. The geotechnical subconsultant determined that the extent of alluvial deposits is greater than anticipated. To better anticipate work conditions and minimize change orders during construction, additional borings will be conducted along the proposed alignment of the pipe to establish the type of soils present. Board of Directors Page 5 November S, 2000 The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)submitted an alternative realignment option for the SARI line. Staff has directed Brown and Caldwell to review SAWPA's idea. Brown and Caldwell is preparing an addendum to provide the additional services necessary to acquire the easements, conductsupplemental geotechnical work and to evaluate the realignment alternative suggested by SAWPA. A significant emphasis of the SARI line relocation project will be community outreach. Within the cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim, there are residents, environmental groups, businesses, recreational trail users, utilities and endangered species populations that may be affected by the pipeline relocation. Most of this has been anticipated and described in the EIR and other project documents. It is the intent of OCSD to make sure that prior to and throughout construction, all affected groups receive adequate information about the project. Discussion continues with the staffs of the cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim, key county departments and other utilities involved in permitting, design review and other aspects of the design stage has been ongoing. General outreach to the public will begin in January 2001 and continue through the completion of the project. Public outreach is being coordinated by Lisa Lawson, OCSD communications manager, with cooperation from NCG Porter Novelli s Michelle Tuchman, the public relations firm contracted through Brown and Caldwell. OCSD Joins "School Counts" The District has joined School Counts. A press release is attached. Legislative Activities: Coastal Resources Enhancement and Restoration Act of 2000 Representative Dana Rohrabacher has recently introduced the Coastal Resources Enhancement and Restoration Act of 2000 (H.R. 5535). This Act provides funding for beach replenishment, aquatic habitat restoration in areas impacted by runoff, and a comprehensive ocean observing system pilot program. The pilot program is designed to work in partnership with local and regional interests such as our agency and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). One of the two pilot projects identified in the Act is slated for Southern California with Orange County serving as the focal point. The project would assist the District in gathering offshore information as part of our ocean monitoring program. Monitoring Board of Directors Page 6 November 8, 2000 and research parameters will include: wave heights, periods, and swell direction; weather; coastal currents; large mammal movement; sewage outfall movement; water quality including bacteria counts, sediment movement, and red tides; fishing boat tracking; oil spill tracking; beach erosion; river mouth outflow sediment observation; and Global Information System coastal mapping. The Act provides $2 million per year for the two pilot projects. Odor Complaints Attached is a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. la e . An Verson General Manager BPA:jt H:IWP OTAWOMIMGMdETTERS TO THE BOMUbT1115WWC Attachments Date: November 6,2000 Orange County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2000 PLANT NO.1 Jan If Feb If Mar 11 Apr I I May Jun I I Jul 11 Aua 11 S.P If Oct 11 Nov If Dee 1 Int Ino j 3121 n0 W18 n0 7@0 6 9I10 a 312t n0 0M plant ralaletl Total: 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 PLANT NO.2 Jan 11 Feb Mar If Apr I I May Jun 11 Jul ; Au Se Oat d I Nov I I Dee 2/3 1110 314 M 4700 no W as W13 a 7/21 b W11 Ino 913 np 1wI s2/70 Wt7 no 4R7 v2F es W1J 7124 no W14Wt no 70120 2/1J 4129 n0 W2T ee 7/30 9 W15 W12 n0 1QnF a &19 n0 W29 es 7/30 s TIFF W1) no 10/22 2/20 no 7/30 s 0/e0TM a pant .WI&d s Total: 0 2 1 1 4 2 6 0 5 1 Collection Systems Jan Fab Mar A r May Jun Jul Atus am Oct Nov Dec 113 2I8 M V13 W2 Bp 7/T at E13 W12 1012 713 Vill n 4I76 W12 W19 7n Ml 6/14 Will 7W16 110 2/28 3116 4/1g W15 MI 7112 Ul 8114 9/19 10123 1/10 4R8 WIB 922 7/20 Bf02 Wi6 9/22 126 4/20 95 W20 8103 W77 127 725 WJO BIW Wi6 930 BIOS W22 610 W27 W12 Coll.:Total 6 Total 3 Total 3 TOWI 5 Total 7 Total 8 Total 4 Total 17 Total 4 Total 3 Total TOW RJO:YSH:d:ll Thls spreadsheet does not Indude In-house odor complaints g9exmI.dtMom\Odor Complaint Log.xls LA Times Page 1 of CLICK HERE t rrr,► P °/a SAVET70 , travekapeco ol"St"u Home I Site Map I Archives I Print Edition I Discussions I Advertise I Feedback I Help News Business Soorts http://v .Latimes.com/never/science/envimn/20001022/t0001OD966.htmt Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Sh000ine music mimes Arl jobs home:, Back to story V.rrenuurants c=n rentals Sunday, October 22, 2000 Success of Environmental Laws Hinges on Public Perception By SHARON M.STERN,ERIN AIELLO Strong environmental laws, even when they protect public health, often are considered counterproductive to economic growth and community satisfaction. Despite enhanced protection, the drawbacks are often promoted as cause for maintaining weaker legislation. But is this what always happens? Are some laws more effective in gaining public support despite stricter protection requirements? And if so, why?How does behavior change when scientists conclude the risk no longer exists? We propose that there are three main factors that influence the public's risk perception and their future behavior: how the risk is conveyed to the public by the media, faith in government protection policies, and the amount of control people have over their health. These factors are of paramount importance in determining the success of an environmental law and should be considered when new laws are proposed. Safe recreational waters are a high priority for California, a symbol of the beach ideal. So we used a new beach protection law, California AB411, to evaluate how the community perceives the risk of ocean pollution. As we are all aware, polluted water necessitated closing most of Huntington Beach's coast during the summer of 1999. Other beaches have also required closure. With these stricter requirements on sampling involving new indicator bacteria, monitoring and public notification, the public was assured that its health was better protected than previously. The news media, primarily newspapers and television, chronicled the search for the contaminant source and were instrumental in keeping people informed. Last spring we conducted informal written interviews with roughly 125 people representing various ages and cultures at Huntington State Beach and Newport Beach. We asked about their perception of the previous summer's contamination. Specifically, we wanted to discover the extent of their information about the contamination and the closures,where they got their information, and how this information influenced their decisions to go to the beach. http://www.latimes.conVcgi-bin/print.cgi 10/23/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 2 We felt this information would be important for city and state officials as they evaluated the impact of this new law. Our study provided interesting observations about the public's perception of risk and its behavior as a result of the Huntington Beach bacterial contamination. We found that most (84%) of the beachgoers were aware of the previous summer's contamination and prolonged closure at Huntington State Beach, the majority(81%) having learned of the problems from the newspaper or TV news. The accuracy of their knowledge, however, reflected the vagaries of the reporting in the different media and any sensationalism. Half(49%)of the people interviewed were aware that the problem was a result of urban runoff and not sewage, but the other half(51%)thought it was sewage and fecal-related. Apparently, the second-guessing by the media during the exploration of the problem was recalled as frequently as the true source. Only a third (32%)of the beachgoers were aware that specific bacteria were used to detect pollution, which told us that the public wasn't very informed, had minimal recall about, or wasn't interested in the science that goes into beach closures. Posting is required and closure mandated if one bacterial standard is exceeded. The beachgoers were aware that a closure sign signified unhealthful conditions. Our study also provided insight into the impact of strong environmental laws. Some observers predicted dire fallout from AB411 because of the intense media coverage and the high visibility of closure signs. Surprisingly, we found that most (81%) respondents had not changed the frequency of their beach visits. This was true in part because the beachgoers said they were attracted to the beach for aesthetic reasons as well as for recreation. Only 2% responded that they would enter the water if there were "closed" signs even if the water looked clean, but, surprisingly, 30e/o said they would enter dirty and brown water if the beach were not posted as contaminated. Our study results showed that many people's perceptions were influenced by their faith in the government, the beauty of the beach, the influence of the news and the control people felt they have over their own health. It is important that policymakers recognize what the public thinks because public perception can have a significant impact on both future policy and economics. Sharon M. Stem Is a Lecturer in the Department of Environmental Analysis and Design at Uc Irvine, Erin Aiello Is a Graduate Student in the School of Public Health at the University of Washington Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times Choose a City: Ne wFtomeNatwork.catri' Los Angeles M http://www.latimes.conVegi-bin/print.cgi 10/23/2000 WORD QD ORANGE COUNTY uwc apa tan BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION: October 13, 2000 Julie Fuentes, OCBC — 949-476-2242 Julie Eckstein, OCDE— 714-966-4459 ■ SCHOOL COUNTS! CAMPAIGN LAUNCHES IN ORANGE COUNTY NEARLY 100 COMPANIES, BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS, AND PUBLIC AGENCIES ENDORSE Attachment: School Counts! Endorsement List October 13, 2000 (IRVINE, CA) — With nearly 100 companies, business organizations, and public agencies endorsing the project, School Counts! was launched in Orange County today at the annual Business-Education Partnership Conference. School Countsl is part of a national campaign that has been tailored to Orange County. Also known as Making Academics Count and initiated by the National Alliance of Business, the Business Roundtable, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and nine other national business organizations, the campaign has the support of prominent companies nationwide. The purpose of the effort is to draw connections between achievement in school and success in the workplace. Employers participating in the School Counts! campaign encourage job applicants — especially high school students and recent high school and college 1 of 5 graduates — to supplement their job applications with school records, personal portfolios, and/or other documents that describe their academic and job-related p performance. School records attached to a job application may include any or all of the following: ➢ Academic transcripts or last report card ➢ Attendance records ➢ Portfolios, including writing samples and awards ➢ The "Employability Transcript' ➢ Resumes ➢ Letters of recommendation ➢ Evidence of work-based experience or workplace skills ➢ Anything that demonstrates proficiency in the"Skills for Success' areas. When a student or recent graduate provides an employer with school records, the student has the opportunity to showcase his or her achievements and the employer has the opportunity to get to know the job applicant better. Experience has shown that the use of school records in the interviewing/hiring process causes students to realize that what they are learning and how they are performing in school does matter, and usually results in more successful hiring decisions by employers. "The practice of asking for high school transcripts when making hiring decisions for entry level workers speaks to our steadfast commitment to improve education, to reward the effort and accomplishments of students as they seek to enter the world of work, and to ultimately strengthen business and the economy," said Edward B. Rust, Jr., Chairman and CEO of State Farm Insurance Companies; Chairman of The Business Roundtable Education Task Force; and Chairman of the National Alliance of Business. 2of5 The Orange County Coalition, the Workforce Investment Board, the Orange County Department of Education, and Vital Link Orange County will join the Orange County Business Council in promoting the Orange County effort. A task force comprised of business representatives and educators has been formed to launch and implement School Countsl in Orange County. "The Orange County Business Council has been pleased to lead the School Countsl launch," said Stan Offelie, President & CEO of the Orange County Business Council. 'This campaign will send an important message to students that Orange County employers are concerned about preparing and ultimately hiring the highest qualified employees for their companies. The ability to demonstrate performance in high school is a good indicator of future performance in the workplace." "The Orange County Department of Education devotes tremendous energy toward promoting business-education partnerships," said Dr. John F. Dean, Superintendent of Schools. "Students will be motivated toward achievement when they learn of business' interest in their accomplishments. The Orange County Department of Education and educators throughout Orange County applaud this partnership." School Countsl employers will begin asking for school records in January. 3 of 5 SCHOOL COUNTS ENDORSEMENT LIST n 10/13/00 Businesses/Companies Marriott Hotels, Central and South Abbott Resource Group Orange County Automobile Club of So. California Merrill Lynch Balboa Instruments Odetics Basix Business Solutions, Inc. Orange County Business Journal Carlton, DiSante & Freudenberger Orange County Teachers Federal Coatings Resource Corporation Credit Union Conexant Systems, Inc. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Cox Communitcations RAH Consulting Group, Inc. Deloitte &Touche Robert Bein, William Frost &Assoc. DIMA Ventures Saddleback Memorial Medical Disneyland Resort Center El Dorado Bank Shea Properties Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Silicon Valley Bank Ernst &Young LLP Southern California Edison FileNet Corporation Strategic Planning Associates First American • The Boeing Company Fluor Corporation The Gas Company, a Sempra Ford Motor Company Energy Company GM Associates The Nielsen Company G. M. Smith Associates, Inc. The Robert Mayer Corp. Hearthside Homes, Inc. The Wilck Group Hoag Hospital Transportation Corridor Agencies Lee Hecht Harrison Ware Disposal Lindquist Group Wedin Enterprises LSA Associates Westamerica Graphics Meredith J. Khachigian, Consultant Work Care, Inc. Community and Public Affairs - CONTINUED-4 of SCHOOL COUNTS ENDORSEMENT LIST <cont> Business Organizations AeA Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Building Industry Association Black Chamber of Commerce Constitutional Rights Foundation of Orange County Costa Mesa Chamber Dana Point Chamber of Commerce Federated Chambers of Commerce Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Future Scientists and Engineers of America Home Builders Council Irvine Chamber of Commerce Junior Achievement of Orange County Manufactured Housing Education Trust NAIOP SoCal. Orange Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Bureau Orange County Business Council Orange County Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse Project Tomorrow San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce Santa Ana Chamber Software Council of Southern California South Orange County Regional Chamber of Commerce Venture Point—Tech Coast SBDC Education/Public Agency Partners Anaheim Union High School District California State University, Fullerton City of Brea Graduate School of Management, UC Irvine Orange County Coalition: Vision 2020 Orange County Department of Education —v- Orange County Sanitation District Santa Margarita Water District Supervisor Tom Wilson U.S. Department of Commerce—Orange County Export Assistance Center Workforce Investment Board, OC fF## AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING November 15, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. . 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 11115100 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on October 25, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. B. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/00 10/31/00 Totals $5,689.402.06 $5.431,183.35 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file petition from J. R. Haxton requesting annexation of 1.21 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Brier Lane and Cowan Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-20, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-13, Haxton Annexation). END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 11/15/00 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 15, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 25, 2000 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re November 1, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 1, 2000 to be filed. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-28, approving the Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement with Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), providing for initial term of the agreement of one year with a total term of four years including extensions effective July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2005 with District's contribution not to exceed $1,223,000 over the four-year term. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re November 2, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 2, 2000 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46.2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$125,074, and a time extension of 105 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,528,233. d. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to provide inspection, engineering services, and prepare a report on the structural integrity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-2-4; Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-17; and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $900,000. e. 1) Establish a budget for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1- 83, in the amount of$1,488,000; and (2)Authorize Staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for design services for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1-83. f. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, providing for additional services, for an additional amount of$224,153, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $649,073. 11/15/00 Page 4 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the November 8, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 8, 2000 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 2000. d. Receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 2000. e. Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-29, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Create Limited Term contract Engineer classification at pay range E13 ($57,122 - $94,929); (2) Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068- $70,847); and (3) Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99/00 budget at a proposed cost of$5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. g. Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re November 13, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 16 and October 30, 2000 to be filed. 16. 1) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-039 with Kemiron Pacific, Inc., ending November 30, 2000, providing for an increase of$275,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,400,388.75; and 2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award a contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc. at a unit price of$316.79 including sales tax and delivery, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $2,400,368.75. 11/15/00 Page 5 17. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications, Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 Wwp da\adminSSV gmda\11ISM dwLLdm Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 25, 2000 O� ANITAT� Q 9 c o .a FCT�NQ H ENS � ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 10/25/00 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,was held on October 25, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler X Peter Green, Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Jan Debay Tom Thomson X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X John M. Gullixson Ken Ryan X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts A Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Peer Swan Darryl Miller X Charles E. Sylvia Art DeBolt Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager, Jean Tappan, Acting Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Lisa Lawson; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Greg Mathews; Jeff Reed; John Linder, Jim Herberg; Ryal Wheeler, Jon Thomsic; Paula Zeller; Mahin Talebi; Adrian Renescu; Deon Carrico; Mike Reideler, Mary Sue Thompson; Ran DeWitt; Bea Mitchell; Mike Zedek; Mark Kawamoto; Carla Dillon OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Dan Cassidy;Art Perry; Terry Lane; Art Debolt; Jeff Berk; Paul Mitchell Minutes for Board Meeting " Page 3 1025/00 REPORT OF THE CHAIR It was announced that the OMTS Committee will hold its November 1, 2000 meeting at Plant 2 in the Control Center. A tour is scheduled of several of the facilities beginning at 4 p.m. and the regular meeting will begin at 5 p.m. Chair Eckenrode also announced that the District received the Second Place 2000 National Pretreatment Program Excellence Award at the Water Environment Federation convention in Anaheim on October 16. This is the fourth EPA National Award the Source Control Division has received in the past eight years (two second place awards and two first place awards). Mr. Eckenrode and Mr. Anderson then recognized members of the Source Control Division and presented them with the award. They were: Mahin Talebi, Source Control manager,Addana Renescu, engineering supervisor, Deon Carrico, inspector, Mike Reideler, inspector, Mary Sue Thompson, inspector, Ron DeWitt, inspector, Bea Mitchell, office specialist; Mike Zedek, permit/- enforcement engineer; Mark Kawamoto, pernittenforcement engineer, and Carla Dillon, permit/- enforcement engineer. Ms. Talebi thanked the Directors and management for their continued support and said that the award demonstrates the hard work and talents of the people in the Source Control Division. She affirmed the division's commitment that they will be innovative, use the latest technology including e-government to do the job more efficiently. Mr. Eckenrode congratulated the staff for their excellent program and dedication. Chair Eckenrode reminded the Directors that there will be a workshop at the District on the GWRS project on Saturday, December 2 at 8 a.m. This will be the final review of the project before the go/no-go decision at the January 24, 2001 Board Meeting. The dates and location of the four GWRS public workshops were announced. They are: November 16 at 7 p.m. Anaheim Community Center Assembly Halt 205 East Center Street,Anaheim November 18 at 10 a.m. Huntington Beach Library, Room C 7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach November 28 at 7 p.m. Fullerton Public Library Room B 353 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton November 30 at 7 p.m. Irvine City Hall Irvine City Council Chambers 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine Chair Eckenrode encouraged the Directors to attend one or more of the public information workshops. The purpose of the workshops is to present basic information about GWRS project to the public and to receive comments. Chair Eckenrode also reminded the Directors that if they left the Board Room during the meeting for recusant purposes during a vote, they must notify the Board Secretary or other minute taker that their action should be reflected in the minutes. Leaving the room will not be noted in the minutes. Chair Eckenrode announced that he has invited Orange County's elected representatives to Sacramento and Washington and other interested parties to a luncheon meeting on Thursday, Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 10/25/00 December 14 between 12 and 2 at the District. The purpose of the meeting is to foster bipartisan discussion of local urban runoff, upstream runoff, tainted beaches and watershed management issues, and to educate, increase awareness of how big the problems really are and to move legislators to action. Shawn Boyd announced that Seal Beach was holding a beach cleanup on Saturday, October 28th at 11 a.m. and he encouraged attendance. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27,2000 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and"B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/00 09/30/00 Totals $4,034,186.37 $4,9987,592.42 Director Patterson abstained on Warrants Nos. 30057 and 30058. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. There were no items on the Consent Calendar. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the October 25, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 27, 2000 to be filed. 12. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the October 5, 2000 meeting. The Chair recommended changes to the minutes and ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the Meeting held October 5, 2000 to be filed as revised. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 10/25/00 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39,with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$196,994 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,275,269. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-55, with Ark Construction Co., authorizing a 64-calendar day time extension to the contract; and (2)Accept Tunnel Structural Rehabilitation at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-55, with Ark Construction Co., as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Establish a budget of$524,700 for Relocation of the South Anaheim Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-27-1. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2,for an amount not to exceed $6,187,400; (2) Approve a budget transfer of$2,074,400 from Job No. J-73, Cooperative Projects Program, to Job No. J-73-2, Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, increasing the total project budget to$7,074,000. 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Borthwick, Guy, Bettenhausen Landscape Architects, Inc.to provide design and construction support services for Landscaping and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, for an amount not to exceed $139,095. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve a budget amendment of $177,000 for Sunflower Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, for a total budget of $585,000; (2) Approve plans and specifications for Sunflower Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for Distribution/Junction Box and Sludge Belt Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-1, and Disfibution/Juncdon box Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve a budget amendment of$288,000 for Job No. J-71-1, increasing the total budget to $672,000; and a budget amendment of$208,000 for Job No. J-71-2, increasing the total project budget to$484,000; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Establish a project budget for Programmable Logic control Programming and Integration, Job No. J-83, for a total project budget of$445,000. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Control No. 5.46, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (2)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 10/25/00 I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of $145,000 for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, for a total project budget of$902,000; (2)Approve plans and specifications for HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80; and (3) Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. M. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of $165,600 for the Chlorine Building Mechanical Equipment Demolition at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-60,for a total project budget of$210,600; (2)Approve plans and specifications for the Chlorine Building Mechanical Equipment Demolition at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-60, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (3)Authorize Staff to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. 13. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Mark Leyes, Vice Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the October 11, 2000 and meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meetings. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the Meeting held October 11, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-25, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-26,Approving District's Records Retention Schedule and Adopting Policies and Procedures, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-16. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-27, Adopting Policy re Sewer Service Fee Refunds Allowing Current Parcel Owners to Receive Sanitary Sewer Service Fee Refunds for Parcels Not Connected to the Sewer System, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-25; and, direct staff to process refunds in-house. 14. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re the meeting held on October 16, 2000. Director Patterson urged those cities that have not passed resolutions of support for the projects to consider doing so after the November elections. Director Swan made the Directors aware that the Groundwater Producers Association sent the Orange County Water District a letter expressing concern about the viability of the project and asked for an evaluation of an alternate proposal prepared by IRWD. Mr. Anderson reported that a presentation is being prepared for the November 8 Finance, Administration and Human Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 10/25/00 Resources Committee meeting that will evaluate the financial and policy implications of the IRWD proposal and compare the two projects. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 18, 2000 to be filed. Director Gullixson left the meeting at 8:09 p.m. and did not return. 15. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54957.E AND 54956.9:The Board convened in dosed session at 8:13 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 15 (a)(1), (2), and Supplemental Agenda Item Nos. 17(d) and (a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 17(d). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 17(c), and no report was given. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:20 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. General Counsel Woodruff announced that only the items listed on the agenda and supplemental agenda were discussed in closed session. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: The Board of Directors approved the Memorandum of Understanding with the SPMT Unit in accordance with the proposal submitted jointly by the SPMT Unit and District management. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: The Board of Directors directed General Counsel not to file a cross complaint against the City of Fountain Valley, CA re Tran, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. OOCC305306. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m. � F � ing Secretary Qf thdi Board of Directors of nge County Sanitation District H:kwp.d1aNagendMBoarE MinutesMDO Board Mmutesu=50D.dx Claims Paid From 9/1100 to 9116/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 29991 Orange County Sanitation District $ 417.847.54 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 29992 Southern Caffomia Edison 72,849.76 Power 29993 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,907.56 Safety Supplies 29994 American Airlines 3,939.50 Travel Services 29995 American Management Association 2,010.00 Training Registration 29996 ASSE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 445.00 Training Registration 29997 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 40.60 Telephone Service 29998 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,169.59 Long Distance Telephone Service 29999 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,531.37 Cellular Telephone Service 30000 Court Order 616.00 Wage Garnishment 30001 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 30002 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30003 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 214.42 Electrical Supplies 30004 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1.500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 30005 CEM Corporation 600.68 Lab Supplies 30006 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30007 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30008 Verizon California 2,184.94 Telephone Services 30D09 Harbour Engineering Group 4,378.46 Pump Supplies 30010 City of Huntington Beach 17,070.54 Water Use 30011 Industrial Air Compressor 1.300.00 Compressor Supplies 30012 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,346.14 Dues Deduction 30013 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.54 Water Use 30014 Lee&Ro, Inc. 8,979.68 Engineering Consulting Services 5-52 30015 Lessons in Leadership 2.601.00 Training Registration 30016 Marriott Wardman Park 2.143.44 Training Registration 30017 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 96.77 Tools 30018 City of Newport Beach 40.61 Water Use 30019 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 30020 OCFA 549.20 Dues Deduction 30021 Pacific Bell 15.00 Telephone Services 30022 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30023 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 30024 Peace Officers Council of CA 882.00 Dues Deduction 30025 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,038.99 Tools 30026 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,782.34 Tools/Hardware 30027 Southern California Water 92.81 Water Use 30028 Summit Steel 72.00 Metal 30029 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 30030 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,278.59 Mechanical Supplies 30031 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 40.00 O&M Training Registration Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 911/00 to 9115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30032 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 30033 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 225.00 Meeting Expense 30034 Danny L.Dillon 538.27 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimb. 30035 James D.Herberg 181.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 30038 Kurt B. Lind 110.88 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb, 30037 Belachandra P.Rao 104.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 30038 Robert J.Taylor 1,209.57 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 30039 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,470.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30040 Residuals Processing,Inc. 48,482.80 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 30041 Boyle Engineering Corporation 66,805.41 Engineering Services 2-31,2-50,7-27&1-2-4 30042 Burch Ford 29,101.12 2000 Ford Explorer for Safety&Emergency Response 30043 Carollo Engineers 93,356.24 Engineering Services P2-60 30044 CH2MHIII 69,191.94 Engineering Service J-71-4 30045 Huntington Beach Dodge 47.476.50 (2)2000 Dodge CNG Cargo Vans 30D46 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 28.676.37 Medical Insurance Premium 30047 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 118,910.41 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 30048 Mec Analytical System 48,573.99 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 30D49 Moreland&Associates 26.458.75 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 30050 Orange County Water District 49,768.98 GAP Water Use MO 1D-23.96 30051 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 190.359.54 Engineering Services J42 30052 Projects Partners 57.401.04 Temporary Employment Services 30053 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 157,988.25 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 30064 U.S. Filter Corporation 29.976.26 Service Agreement-Chemical Testing Demonstration 30055 Vulcan 28,398.75 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30056 Western States Chemical, Inc. 27,525.14 Caustic Sods MO 8.23.95 30057 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 379,193.94 Construction 338.1 30058 Ken Thompson,Inc. 341,614.46 Construction 11-173&11.20 30059 Union Bank of California 37.957.17 Construction 11-17.3&11.20,Retention 30080 A.M. Best Company, Inc. 88.95 Publication 30061 A-Plus Systems 7.095.18 Notices&Ads 30062 Abesca 554.53 Hardware 30063 Acoustical Material Services 310.32 Tile 30064 Action Instruments 1,625.26 Electrical Supplies 30065 Action Technologies 2,50D.00 Engineering Design Training Registration 30066 Aearo Company 389.00 Safety Supplies 30067 Agllent Technologies, Inc. 603.98 Lab Supplies 30068 Airborne Express 22.14 Air Freight 30069 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 174.47 Safety Supplies 30070 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 3,047.50 Mechanical Supplies 30071 American Public Works Association 135.00 Publication 30072 Analysts, Inc. 851.08 Testing Kits 30073 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 1,080.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control Page 2 of 8 ' Claims Paid From 911I00 to 9115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30074 Applied Industrial Technology 870.48 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 30075 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,026.00 Vacuum Truck Services 30076 Asbury Environmental Services 80.00 Waste Oil Removal 30077 Auerbach Publications 175.00 Publication 30078 Auto Shop Equipment Co., Inc. 63.83 Auto Shop Supplies 30079 ASS Instrumentation 867.48 Instrument Repair 30080 ARA Engineering Contractor 6,540.00 Construction Service-Wemco Pump Installation 30081 ASL Consulting Engineers 11,415.59 Consulting Service 11-22 30082 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 37.26 Telephone Service 30083 AWSI 286.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 30084 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 6,740.84 Electrical Supplies 30055 Battery Specialties 139.64 Batteries 30086 Beach Paving,Inc. 1,125.00 Asphalt Repair 30087 Bantry Nevada Corporation 1,482.60 Instrument Supplies 30088 Brooks Instrument Div, 251.61 Instruments 30089 Bush 8 Associates, Inc. 2.226.00 Surveying Services MO6-25-97 30090 Cal-Glass, Inc. 88.14 Lab Equipment Service 30091 California Auto Refrigeration Dist., Inc. 1,878.76 Service Agreement 30092 California Relocation Services,Inc. 252.00 Office Moving Services 30093 CalCoast 1,000.00 Preserving Coastal Environment Conference Sponsorship 30094 Carl R. Nelson,P.E. 4,100.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 30095 Carleton Engineers 5 Consultants,Inc. 680.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 3D096 Chem-Dry Of Huntington Beach 450.00 Carpet Cleaning 30097 City of Garden Grove 414.04 Vehicle Claim Settlement 30098 Coast Fire Equipment 577.18 Service Agreement 30099 Compressor Components Of California 3,639.80 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 30100 Computers America, Inc. 272.62 Computer Supplies 30101 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 4,669.39 Electrical Supplies 30102 Converse Consultants 4,870.00 Consulting Service 11-17-3 30103 Convey Compliance Systems, Inc. 340.00 Computer Supplies 30104 Corporate Express 1,035.56 Office Supplies 30105 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,795.81 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30106 County Wholesale Electric Co. 904.50 Electrical Supplies 30107 Culligan of Orange County 441.77 Soft Water Service 30108 CA Utilities Emergency Assn. 1.000.00 Membership 30109 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 7.872.48 CCTV Sewer Inspection 30110 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 1,408.36 Lab Supplies 30111 CRC Press, Inc. 89.90 Publication 30112 CSMFO 50.00 Seminar Registration 30113 CA State University,Son Bernardino 250.00 Water Resources Institute Registration 30114 20DO CWEA SRTSC 195.00 Southern Regional Training 8 Safety Conference Registration 30115 David's Tree Service 9,170.00 Tree Maim.Service Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 911/00 to 9/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30116 DeZurik C/O Misco/SoulhWest 1,395.27 Valves 30117 Dionez Corporation 1.754.29 Lab Supplies 30118 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 685.97 Paint Supplies 30119 DOB Engineering, Inc. 11.330.00 Temporary Employment Services 30120 DGA Consultants, Inc. 6,948.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 30121 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 268.63 Electrical Supplies 30122 E-Z Up Factory Outlet 336.72 Shade Canopy 30123 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 170.00 Medical Screening 30124 Eleclm-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts 5 Supplies 30125 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 4.525.50 Safety Supplies 30126 Enchanter,Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 30127 Environmental Engineering 8 Contracting 19,400.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 30128 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 30129 Environmental Sampling Supply 221.74 Lab Supplies 30130 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.020.88 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 30131 FedEz Corporation 134.32 Air Freight 30132 CSC/Fibertron 706.53 Fiber Optic Cable 30133 Fine Science Tools,Inc. 192.14 Tools 30134 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,415.01 Lab Supplies 30135 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 280.00 Concrete Cutting 30136 Flo-Systems,Inc. 2,733.11 Pump Supplies 30137 Forkert Engineering 8 Surveying,Inc. 4,074.50 Engineering Services P-183 30138 Fountain Valley Camera 44.90 Photo Supplies 30139 Fys Electronics 1,633.18 Computer Supplies 30140 FM International. Inc. 5,478.46 Professional Service J-25-1 30141 GB Products 1,569.54 Office Equipment-Shredder 30142 General Electric Supply Company 4,890.88 Electric Parts 30143 Garish[Lumber Company 439.99 Lumber/Hardware 30144 George Yardley Co. 623A3 Lab Supplies 30145 Goldenwest Fence Company 750.00 Perimeter Fencing 30146 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service 30147 WW Grainger, Inc. 1.404.51 Compressor Supplies 30148 Graphic Design Book Club 92.74 Technical Manuals 30149 Graseby S.T.I. 1,255.85 Engine Supplies 30150 Graybar Electric Company 386.74 Electrical Supplies 30151 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 639.80 Instrument Supplies 30152 Verizon California 1,856.97 Telephone Services 30153 Heaker Equipment Company 146.14 Truck Supplies 30154 Hach Company 2,073.44 Lab Supplies 30155 Hamilton Company 245,27 Lab Supplies 30166 Harold Primrose Ice 80.00 Ice For Samples 30157 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 200.95 Plumbing Supplies Page 4 of 8 , Claims Paid From 9111100 to 9115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30158 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 2.612.17 Engine Generator Control Supplies 30159 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 98.65 Meeting Expenses 30160 Hilli,Inc. 72.28 Tools 30161 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 542.97 Compressor Parts 30162 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 521.10 Engineering Service 2-40 30183 Home Depot 512.92 Small Hardware 30164 Horizon Technology 6,714.77 Lab Supplies 30165 Hunts'Final Phase 1,625.00 Construction Service-Eastside Primary Basin Sampling Bldg Roof 30166 Hutchings Court Reporters,L.L.C. 592.50 Vehicle Claim Service 30167 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,296.48 Printing Service 30168 Oak Fabco I Industrial Steam 797.64 Pump Supplies 30169 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 1,950.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30170 Infinity Technology USA 2.327.40 Office Supplies 30171 Information Resources 125,00 Human Resources Service 30172 Infotec Santa Ana 1,495,00 IT Training Registration 30173 Intermec Corporation 280.50 Lab Supplies 30174 Irvine Photo Graphics 34.40 Photographic Services 30175 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM ASM00 Upgrade 30176 J&B Auto Parts 122.49 Auto Parts&Supplies 30177 J&L Industrial Supply 45.80 Tools 30178 J.H.Hall&Associates 147.40 Paint Supplies 30179 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 14,597.60 Misc.Construction Service-Junction Structure Carbon Canisters Installation 30180 Jay's Catering 720.02 Meeting Expenses 30181 Johnstone Supply 270.25 Electrical Supplies 30182 Karen Monaco&Associates 7,062.50 FIS Support Services 30183 Kerry Consulting Group 3,061.05 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 30184 Knox Industrial Supplies 800.76 Tools 30185 Lab Support 5,820.72 Temporary Employment Services 30186 Labeltronix 4,840.00 Zebra Printer Meint Agreement 30187 Law Offices of Kinds, Rodiger&Spriggs 2.922.00 Vehicle Claim Service 30188 Lee&Ro, Inc. 8,146.32 Engineering Consulting Services P2-39&P247-1 30189 Life Cycle Engineering,Inc. 3,250.00 O&M Training Registration 30190 Gerald R.Jones 7,418.61 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 30191 Luccrs 93.00 Meeting Expense 30192 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 10.110.00 Engineering Services Pi-62 30193 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 12,500.00 Boiler Repair 30194 MarVac Electronics 222.78 Instrument Supplies 30195 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,132.00 Tools 30196 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 6,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 30197 Mid-West Associates 13,095.98 Pump Supplies 30198 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 7,243.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30199 Mission Uniform Service 3.712.13 Uniform Rentals Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 911100 to 9115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 302DO The Mission Viejo News, Inc. 345.00 Notices&Ads 30201 Mitchell Instrument Co. 127.00 Instruments 30202 MAP 3,000.00 Management Consulting Service 30203 N.Glantz&Son 525.00 Vinyl Sheeting 302D4 National Institute of Stds&Technology 2,600.00 Lab Supplies 30205 National Plant Services, Inc. 2,392.50 Vacuum Truck Services 30206 Neal Supply Co. 40.73 Plumbing Supplies 30207 Newark Electronics 164.8.5 Instrument Supplies 30208 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 255.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 30209 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mail Delivery Service 30210 Once Depot Business Services Div. 2.075.55 Office Supplies 30211 Olympus America, Inc. 6,694.43 Test Equipment Repair 30212 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 411.07 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30213 Oxygen Service Company 3,269.80 Specialty Gases 30214 OCB Reprographics 35.81 Printing Service-Spec P-173 30215 OCE-USA,Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 30216 Pacific Industrial Supply 30.71 Fumiture&Fixtures 30217 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,208.36 Plumbing Supplies 30218 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 3,616.53 Electrical Supplies 30219 Pagenet 2.006.18 Paging Services 30220 Parker Supply Company 3.019.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30221 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 542.48 Lab Supplies 30222 Perms Pure,Inc. 206.70 Filter 30223 Synagro West, Inc. 9,760.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30224 Polydyne,Inc. 21,349.65 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 30225 PowerTech Engines,Inc. 1263.26 Vehicle Engine LPG Retrofit Kids 30226 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 30227 Prentice Hall Direct 50.47 Publication 30228 Professional Publications, Inc. 727.19 Publication 30229 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 785.00 Electrical Service Maint. 30230 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,024.38 Mechanical Supplies 30231 Putzmeister 872.50 Pump Supplies 30232 Pump Engineering Wor 0 Air 1,987.59 Pump Supplies 30233 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 30234 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 6,581.32 Life Insurance Premium 30235 Ryan He=Products Corp. 142.34 Pump Supplies 30236 RPM Electric Motors 5,317.79 Pump Maim.&Supplies 30237 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 433.78 Mechanical Supplies 30238 Sears Industrial Sales 949.46 Mechanical Supplies 30239 Second-Sun 194.60 Light Fixtures 30240 Sewer Equipment Co.of Florida, Inc. 853.69 Sewer Pipe Supplies 30241 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 4,378.05 Tools Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 911100 to 9/15100 , Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30242 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4,704.67 Toois/Hardware 30243 Siemens Building Technologies 3.840.00 O&M Training Registration 30244 Slemon,Larsen&Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-SARWG&Dairy Producers$2,000 Transfer 30245 Sievers Instruments 547.16 Lab Supplies 30246 Skater, Inc. 2,037.60 Lab Supplies 30247 Snap On Industrial 655.38 Tools 30248 So.Cal.Gas Company 20,848.74 Natural Gas 30249 Southern California Edison 2,739.23 Power 30250 Southwest Air Balance Corp. 985.00 Professional Services-Air Balance&Lido Pump Station 30251 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 4,005.32 Instrument Supplies 30252 Spex Ceriprep,Inc. 411.51 Lab Supplies 30253 Statoil Energy,Inc. 3,000.00 Can Gen Engines Repair 30254 Summit Steel 259.53 Metal 30255 Summit Training Source, Inc. 1,000.00 Safety Training Supplies 30256 Sun International 149.00 Lab Supplies 30257 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 17,215.24 Landscape Maint. 30258 Sunset Ford 224.42 Vehicle Supplies 30259 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,535.25 Mechanical Supplies 30260 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 30281 Society of Environmental Toxicology&Chemistry 596.00 Meeting Registration 30262 SKC-West,Inc. 93.90 Lab Supplies 30263 Talavera&Richardson 4.140.00 Consulting Service-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 30264 The Orange County Register 3,207.98 Notices&Ads 30265 Thermo Optek Corporation 10,80D.0D Lab Equipment Maint. Service 30266 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,364.54 Mechanical Supplies 30267 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 30268 Time Motion Tools 779.29 Tools 30269 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales e.47 Locks&Keys 30270 The Trans Company 2,001.87 Electrical Equipment 30271 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 240.00 Design Engineering Training Registration 30272 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 30273 TCH Associates, Inc. 550.26 Lab Supplies 30274 TEKsystems 400.00 Temporary Employment Services 30275 United Parcel Service 49.67 Parcel Services 30276 United Rental 1,445.36 Forklift Rental 30277 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 912.40 Valve Supplies 30278 Valley Cities Supply Company 659.16 Plumbing Supplies 30279 Varian 2.109.36 Lab Supplies 30280 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,214.00 Door Repair 30281 Vossler&Company 416.05 Mechanical Supplies 30282 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 10,490.21 Lab Supplies 30283 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,038.96 Security Guards Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 911100 to 9I15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30284 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 12.243.28 Engineering Service J-67 30285 WEF 10.00 Meeting Registration 30286 Xerox Corporation 5,248.03 Copier Leases 30287 The Yakima Company 22,049.16 Residuals Removal MD 3.22-00 3D288 Yokogawa Corp.of America 381.14 Strip Charts 30289 31 Mile Equipment Company 1,315.20 Electrical Supplies 30290 Union Bank of California 19,957.57 Construction 3-38-1, Retention 30291 James E.Colston 563.00 MeefinglTralning Expense Relmb. 30292 David P. Halverson 967.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 30293 Penny M. Kyle 1,657.28 Employee Computer Loan Program 30294 Rory Rea 2,583.07 Employee Computer Loan Program 30295 State Farm Insurance Co. 6,482.89 Vehicle Claim Settlement 30296 Wild Rivera Waterpark 1,875.00 Ticket Consignment Agreement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,061,274.43 Payroll Disbursements 20371 -20526 Employee Paychecks 189,434.70 Biweekly Payroll 9/8/00 20527-20704 Employee Paychecks 136,923.04 501 Refro 8 Adjustments 52778-53230 Direct Deposit Statements 646,554.20 Biweekly Payroll 9/6/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 972,911.94 Total Claims Paid 9/110 0-911 510 0 $ 4,034,186.37 Page 8 of 8 , „ Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9/30100 0 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 30297 American Express $ 28,261A2 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services 30298 Commercial Resources Tax Group 125,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. 30299 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 27,651.47 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 30300 Orange County Sanitation District 31,701.51 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 30301 Orange County Sanitation District 450,368.75 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30302 Southern California Edison 51.972.20 Power 30303 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,589.49 Safety Supplies 30304 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 244.28 Mechanical Supplies 30305 Awards&Trophies-By Bea 168.61 Plaques 30306 Assoc.of Professional Energy Managers 175.00 O&M Meeting Registration 30307 Barnett Data Systems 2.690.00 IT Meeting Registration 30308 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 80.37 Piping Supplies 30309 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 30310 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 30311 Brithinee Electric 64.19 Electrical Supplies 30312 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30313 Communications Performance Group.Inc. 11,485.86 Professional Sew.-Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 30314 Computational Systems, Inc. 3.000.00 O&M Training Registration 30315 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 43.47 Plumbing Supplies 30316 County of Orange 208.00 Permit Fee 30317 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2.430.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 3D318 CWEA Annual Conference 550.00 0&M Training Registration 30319 Engineering Registration Dept. 106 1,590.00 0&M Training Registration 30320 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30321 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30322 Graybar Electric Company 471.28 Electrical Supplies 30323 Verizon California 2.979.16 Telephone Services 30324 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 30325 Lerman Education Services 209.00 HR Training Registration 30326 Luccl's 61.75 Meeting Expense 30327 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 297.83 Tools 30328 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 181.64 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30329 Orange County Marshal 220.00 Wage Garnishment 30330 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 1.190.51 Fittings 30331 OCEA 539.95 Dues Deduction 30332 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30333 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 30334 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 30335 Property Damage Appraisers 72.00 Vehicle Claim Settlement 30336 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 94.37 Tools/Hardware 30337 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,947.81 Natural Gas Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30338 SoftView Computer Products 2,721.05 Computer Supplies 30339 Southern California Air Cord. Dist. 65.72 Electrical Supplies 30340 ThennoOuest Institute 996.00 Lab Supplies 30341 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 346.25 Mechanical Supplies 30342 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 50.00 0&M Training Registration 30343 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 30344 WEF 100.00 Membership 30345 WEF Publications 711.32 Training Supplies 30346 Frank R.Steiger 956.20 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimb. 30347 James E.Colston 634.37 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 30348 County of Orange 247.80 Publication 30349 Peter M. Hass 1,138.61 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimb. 30350 Martha Nokes 1,645.90 Vehicle Claim Settlement 30351 Cynthia A.O'Neil 106.13 Meeting Expense Reimb. 30352 Orange County Sanitation District 539.65 Petty Cash Reimb. 30353 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 74,142.34 Engineering Service P1-46.2 30364 Blue Cross of California 188,617.95 Medical Insurance Premium 30355 Boyle Engineering Corporation 50.094.28 Engineering Service 1-2-4 30358 Brown&Caldwell 235,397.47 Engineering Service Pt-37 30367 Carollo Engineers 25,079.93 Engineering Service J-254&J-39 30358 Computerized Facility Intergration 100,226.88 Engineering Service J-25-1 30359 Delta Dental 47.562.43 Dental Insurance Plan 30360 Hill Brothers 44.691.69 Odor Control Testing 30361 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 29,386.00 Misc.Construction Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Test Facility Piping 30362 Kennhon Pacific, Inc. 127,920.21 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 30363 Kdeger&Stewart,Inc. 28,021.78 Professional Services Pi-64 30364 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 44,842.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 30365 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 27,616.71 Lubdcant/Diesel Fuel 30366 Orange County Water District 250,458.33 Ground Water Replenishment System 30367 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 113,495.11 Engineering Services J-42 30368 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 388,308.52 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30369 Polydyne, Inc. 32,335.07 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 30370 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 138,173.38 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 30371 Southern California Edison 88,823.21 Power 30372 SPEC Services,Inc. 50,761.04 Engineering Services J-33.1 30373 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 74,234.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30374 Villa Ford 50,760.22 (3)2000 Ford Taunus Sedans 30376 Vulcan 84,659.84 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30376 Western States Chemical,Inc. 42,581.05 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 30377 J W Contracting Corporation 139,905.00 Construction P2-60 30378 Margate Construction, Inc. 98,458.D0 Construction P2-39 30379 S. S.Mechanical Corp. 55,995.63 Construction P40-2&J-53 Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9/30100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30380 Acculite Fasteners 1.103.09 Tool Supplies 30381 Action Instruments 440.52 Electrical Supplies 30382 Action Technologies 2,500.00 Design Engineering Training Registration 30383 Adamson Industries 1.856.75 Lab Supplies 30384 Great American Printing Co. 243.80 Office Supplies 30385 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,937.50 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 30386 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,376.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30387 Aearo Company 374.00 Safety Supplies 30388 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 12,540.63 Lab Supplies 30389 Air Liquids America Corp. 1,286.86 Specialty Gasses 30390 Air Products&Chemicals 24,136.35 0&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 30391 Airborne Express 20.86 Air Freight 30392 Angela&Connie Ornelas 275.00 Vehicle Claim Settlement 30393 Appleone Employment Service 2.921.12 Temporary Employment Services 30394 Applied Industrial Technology 67.60 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30395 Arcus Data Security 398.00 Of site Back-Up Tape Storage 30396 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,079.00 Vacuum Truck Services 30397 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 1.336.15 Waste Removal 30398 Azur Envlronmental 1,260.36 Lab Supplies 30399 AIChE 395.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30400 AKM Consulting Engineers 2,194.42 Consulting Service 11-20 30401 ASL Consulting Engineers 11,595.80 Consulting Service 11-22 30402 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,195.12 Telephone Service 30403 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 244.31 Telephone Service 30404 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.65 Cellular Telephone Service 30405 ATE Products,Inc. 2,333.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 30406 AWWA-WDTC Conference 450.00 Lab Meeting Registration-Water Quality Technology Conference 30407 Battery Specialties 208.43 Batteries 30408 Bloomberg L.P. 5,559.92 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93 304DD SC Wire Rope&Rigging 394.16 Rope 30410 BICSI World Headquarters 194.00 0&M Training Supplies 30411 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,115.00 Pump Supplies 3D412 Califomla Relocation Services, Inc. 152.95 OfBca Moving Services 30413 Career Track 125.00 Design Engineering Training Registration 30414 Cad Warren&Co. 197.02 Insurance Claims Administrator 30415 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 10,618.35 Engineering Services J-71-1,2&P2-82 30416 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,974.68 Instrument Parts 30417 City of Fountain Valley 12,224.40 Water Use 30418 City of Fountain Valley 99320 Plan Check Fee 30419 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 12,300.46 Professional Sew.-Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 30420 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 642.D8 Electrical Supplies 30421 Consolidated Reprographics 78.85 Printing Services Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116I00 to 9130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30422 Converse Consultants 5.962.25 Consulting Services 11-17-3&P2-60 30423 Cooper Energy Services 636.83 Engine Supplies 30424 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1.262.20 Copier Lease 3D425 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 30426 Corporate Express 1,190.22 Of0ce Supplies 30427 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,715.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 30428 Cost Containment Solutions 1.377.74 Worker's Comp.Services 30429 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 57.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30430 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 357.29 Communication Equipment Sam,Agreement 30431 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,034.59 Electrical Supplies 30432 Crane America Services,Inc. 791.04 Crane Services 30433 CALPELRA 990.00 HR Training Registration 30434 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5DD.00 CCTV Sewer Inspection 30435 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc. 72.00 Lab Supplies 30436 CR&R.Inc. 1,987.10 Container Rentals 30437 Computational Systems,Inc. (CSI) 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 30438 CWEA Annual Conference 200.00 Membership 30439 CWEA Membership 60.00 Membership 30440 200D CWEA SRTSC 1,195.00 O&M Training Registration-So.Regional Training&Safety Conference 30441 Dapper Tire Co. 1,045.27 Truck Tires 3D442 David Jenkins&Assoc, Inc. 150.00 Lab Analysis Service 30443 David's Tree Service 4,125.00 Tree Maint.Service 30444 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 468.31 Paint Supplies 30445 DGA Consultants,Inc. 5,704.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 30446 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 22.63 Electrical Supplies 30447 Eagle Picher Industries,L.L.C. 1,234.37 Lab Supplies 30448 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 8,826.00 Safety Training&Consulting Services 30449 Employee Activity Committee 4,432.36 Employee Activity Budgeted Expense 30450 Enchanter, Inc. 2,400.00 Ocean Mon6odng MO 5-24-95 30451 Environmental Resource Association ERA 1,490.70 Lab Supplies 30452 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 534.22 Maint.Service Agreement 30453 FedEx Corporation 308.02 Air Freight 30454 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 846.45 Lab Supplies 30455 Fountain Valley Camera 96.20 Photo Supplies 30456 Franklin Covey 80.70 Office Supplies 30457 Fry's Electronics 1,911.13 Computer Supplies 30458 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 331.42 Drying Beds Gravel 30459 Garra6-Callahan Company 3.407.60 Chemicals 30460 Gastech 5,328.60 Instrument Supplies 30461 Glen Ivy Hot Springs Spa 25.00 Discount Service Cards 30462 VAN Grainger, Inc. 2.640.22 Compressor Supplies 30463 Gmseby S.T.I. 3.315.02 Engine Supplies Page 4 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 30464 Graybar Electric Company 874.87 Electrical Supplies 30465 Westmark Sales, Inc./GU International 1.070.02 Instrument Supplies 30466 Edwards Systems Technology 2.188.76 Safety Service Agreement 30467 Verizon California 998.76 Telephone Services 30468 Halcyon Electric,Inc. 3,750.00 Electrical Supplies 30469 Harcourt,Inc. 92.18 Publication 30470 Hatch 8 Kirk,Inc. 10,215.11 Engine Generator Control Supplies 30471 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 217.90 Meeting Expenses 30472 Hlld, Inc. 808.13 Tools 30473 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 28.15 Compressor Pads 30474 Home Depot 1,708.91 Small Hardware 30475 City of Huntington Beach 17,044.77 Water Use 30476 HI Standard Automotive 1.703.22 Automotive Supplies 30477 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 23.005.00 Records Management Program 30478 Industrial Plastic Supply, Inc. 1,092.49 Plastic Window for Scrubbers 30479 Oak Fabce/Industrial Steam 1,226.87 Pump Supplies 30480 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 310.03 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 30481 Infinity Technology USA 7,316.23 Office Supplies 30482 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 303.93 Lab Supplies 30483 Integra Biosciences, Inc. 90.24 Lab Supplies 30484 Irvine Ranch Water District 57.70 Water Use 30485 IOMA's Salary Surveys 237.95 Publication 30486 Johnstone Supply 472.17 Electrical Supplies 30487 K. S. Dunbar&Associates 4,600.00 Engineering Services 2-41 30488 Kaman Industrial Technologies 202.46 Mechanical Supplies 30489 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 5,250.00 PIS Support Services 30490 Knox Industrial Supplies 643.54 Tools 30491 League Of CA Cities 240.00 Membership 30492 Liebed Cassidy 1,881.26 Professional Service-Human Resources 30493 Gerald R.Jones 4.422.68 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 30494 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 925.00 Architectural Services 30495 Mandic Motors 143.00 Towing Services 30496 MarVac Electronics 10.93 Instrument Supplies 30497 Mad Chlor,Inc. 3,315.22 Valves 30498 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,058.60 Tools 30499 Measurement Variables,Inc. 780.64 Electrical Supplies 30500 Media Clips, Inc. 35.00 Notices 8 Ads 30501 Medlin Controls Co. 1,098.88 Instrument Supplies 30502 Mission Uniform Service 137.00 Uniform Rentals 30503 Mitchell Instrument Co. 583.00 Instruments 30504 Mobile Mini, Inc 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 30505 MotoPhoto 50.91 Photographic Services Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30506 MSA C/O Meg Systems 7.23 Instrument Supplies 30507 National Microcomp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 30508 National Plant Services,Inc. 2,175.00 Vacuum Truck Services 30509 National Safety Council 500.00 Membership 30510 Neal Supply Co. 187.80 Plumbing Supplies 30511 Newport Electronics,Inc. 987.10 Electrical Supplies 30512 Chung M. Nguyen 1,054.70 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimb. 30513 North American Crane Bureau, Inc. 1,640.00 O&M Training Registration 30514 NETSOL/Network Solution 6,562.00 Professional Service-Security System Survey 30515 NWRI National Water Research Institute 25.00 Meeting Registration 30516 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,375.45 Office Supplies 30517 Olivia Chen Consultants,Inc. 7,863.37 Contract Service -Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 30518 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 1,613.44 Electrical Pads&Supplies 30519 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 24.16 Plumbing Supplies 30520 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 444.37 Fittings 30521 Oxygen Service Company 526.53 Specialty Gases 30522 OCB Reprographics 8,534.75 Printing Service-Spec P-173 30623 Pacific Bell 1.125.08 Telephone Services 30524 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,931.52 Plumbing Supplies 30525 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 064.50 Electrical Supplies 3D526 Pagenet 2,838.89 Paging Services 30527 Parker Supply Company 2,842.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30528 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,276.56 Tires 30529 Paveway 1,800.00 Asphalt 30530 Pickens Fuel Corp. 540.00 Professional Service-CNG Program 30531 Pool Supply of Orange County 415.97 Operating Supplies 30532 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 30533 Primary Source 8,342.19 Office Furniture 30534 Primavera 7.693.35 Software Maint. 30535 Projects Partners 22,110.64 Temporary Employment Services 30536 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 30537 Ramsay Corporation 314.95 Publication 30538 Red Valve Company, Inc. 1,382.53 Mechanical Supplies 30539 Restek Corp 467.71 Lab Supplies 30540 RML Properties,Inc. 923.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 30541 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 270.00 Engineering Service-Bldg. H Inspection 30542 RPM Electric Motors 3,435.40 Electric Motor Repair 30543 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 2,175.00 Construction-Manhole Odor Control Improvement 30544 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 524.52 Mechanical Supplies 30545 Schwing America, Inc. 845A2 Pump Supplies 30546 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 747.56 Specialty Gases 30547 Seaventures 4,650.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Page 6 of 8 Claims Paid From 9/18/00 to 9130/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30548 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 747.25 Tools/Hardware 30549 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1,600.00 Professional Service-Chino Basin Transfers 30550 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 892.61 Lab Supplies 30551 SoBView Computer Products 1,782.81 Computer Supplies 30552 SoBCholce 30.07 Software 30553 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 12.874.05 Permit Fees 30564 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 8.695.92 Permit Fees 30555 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 184.29 Penult Fees 30556 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 3,240.16 Permit Fees 30557 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 184.29 Permit Fees 30558 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 184.29 Penult Fees 30559 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 18429 Permit Fees 30560 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 184,29 Permit Fees 30561 Sparkletts 1,976.02 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 30562 Snarling Inst.C/O Patten Corporate 3,185.23 Instrument Supplies 30563 Stanton Radiator 9,892.62 Radiator Repair 30564 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Processing Fee 30565 Strata International, Inc. 606.40 Chemicals 30566 Summit Steel 224.91 Metal 30567 Sun-Bell Landscape&Maintenance 505.00 Landscape Maim. 30568 Sunset Ford 22.13 Vehicle Supplies 30669 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,312.47 Mechanical Supplies 30570 Super Chem Corporation 969.75 Chemicals 30571 SCP Science 350.00 Lab Supplies 30572 Textile Engineering Associates 7,173.90 Valve Supplies 30573 Thermo Optek Corporation 333.73 Lab Supplies 30574 ThermoQuest Corporation 418.31 Lab Supplies 30576 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,215.38 Mechanical Supplies 30576 Thompson Publishing Group 254.D0 Publication 30577 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 30578 Time Warner Communications 80.94 Cable Services 30579 Daily Pilot 68.75 Notices&Ads 30580 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 127.34 Locks&Keys 30581 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 70.00 Lab Services 30582 URM Scientific 843.56 Lab Supplies 30583 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 275.00 Membership 30584 United Parcel Service 538.64 Parcel Services 30585 Unocal 76 39.25 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 Inspection 30586 US Equipment Co.. Inc. 35.73 Valve Supplies 30587 USFilter Westates Carbon 1,388.92 Instrument Supplies 30588 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,040.03 Plumbing Supplies 30589 The Ventage Group,L.L.C. 0,000.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 9116100 to 9130100 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 30590 Varian 1,982.73 Lab Supplies 30591 Veme's Plumbing 1,625.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 30592 Vision Service Plan-CA) 7,388.32 Vision Service Premium 30593 Vortex Industries, Inc. 686.75 Door Repair 30594 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8,774.52 Lab Supplies 30595 Watson Wyatt Data Services 299.00 Publication 30596 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 475.71 Wind Sock Frame 30597 WEF 755.00 O&M Training&Technical Services Meeting Registrations 30698 West Group 426.69 Publication 30599 Wilhelm Electric Co., Inc. 2,245.D0 Construction-Vehicle Charging Station 30600 WorldalWork 85.00 Publication 30601 Xerox Corporation 7,533.26 Copier Leases 30802 Xtension Technologies, Inc. 969.75 Office Supplies 30603 York Unitary Products Group 115.19 Electrical Supplies 30604 Zymark Corporation 7.000.00 Lab Equipment Service 30605 Union Bank of California 2,947.12 Construction P1-46-2&J-53,Retention 30606 Marc A.Brown 871.25 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimb. 30607 Douglas 1. Cook 504.26 Meeting?raining Expense Relmb. 30608 Robert P.Ghirelli 1,592.71 Meeting/framing Expense Reimb. 30609 James W.Mahe 948.59 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb. 30610 Executive Software 3,151.35 Software Maint.Agreement 30611 David Rodriguez 870.64 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 30612 Kronos,Inc. 47,617.00 Software Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,961,950.37 Payroll Disbursements 20705-20815 Employee Paychecks $ 163.099.85 Biweekly Payroll 9120100 20816-20816 Employee Paycheck 475.10 Adjustment 53231 -53681 Direct Deposit Statements 708,426.32 Biweekly Payroll 9/20/00 Total Payroll Disbursements It 872,001.27 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 163,640.78 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 163,640.78 Total Claims Paid 9/16/00-9130100 $ 4,997,592.42 Page 8 of 8 _ BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date rD ad.Dfar. uns/2 0 r AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item yy nber Orange County Sanitation District •Y FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 10/1/00 - 10/15/00 and 10/16/00 - 10/31/00 H%q,Era%fin$lO1MeWMMFeIOl %NoNDIIli al Mpaiddm aemaca. MOM Page 1 Claims Paid From 1011/00 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 30613 Orange County Sanitation District $ 412,186.30 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30614 Robert F.Driver Assoc. 29,576.00 Worker's Compensation Insurance MO6-10-92 30615 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 529.50 Safety Supplies 30616 American Public Works Association 960.00 O&M Training Registration 30617 AMSA 18,975.00 Membership 30618 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security System Maintenance 30819 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.01 Telephone Service 30620 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,097.93 Long Distance Telephone Service 30821 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,569.33 Cellular Telephone Service 30622 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 30623 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 30624 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 136.92 Rope 30625 California Water Awareness Campaign 2000 300.00 Membership 30626 Caltrol, Inc. 1.532.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30627 CalCoest 185.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 30628 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30629 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9,862.50 Computer Maint.Agreement 30630 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 273.43 Electrical Supplies 30631 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,443.80 Plumbing Supplies 30632 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 885.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30633 County Wholesale Electric Co. 93.68 Electrical Supplies 30634 CRC Press,Inc. 6.51 Publication 30635 2000 CWEA SRTSC 1,180.00 O&M Training Registration 30836 DeIrWRigid-Flex,Inc. 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 30637 Voided Check - - 30638 Edwin M.Perkins 18,600.00 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 30639 Electra-Bond 996.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30640 Engelhard West,Inc. 070.00 Reconciliation User Fee Program 30641 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 288.60 Lab Supplies 30642 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30643 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.s644 301.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30644 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 325.26 Lab Supplies 30645 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30646 City of Fullerton 301.66 Water Use 30647 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,671.23 Belt Filter Press Supplies 30648 Edwards Systems Technology 168.D9 Safety Service Agreement 30649 Verizon California 802.56 Telephone Services 30650 Hach Company 32.00 Lab Supplies 30661 Human Resources Council 199.00 O&M Training Registration 30652 City of Huntington Beach 29.26 Water Use 30653 Industrial Air Compressor 100.75 Compressor Supplies 30654 Ind Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,373.70 Dues Deduction 30655 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 30656 IBM Corp. 6.075.37 IBM AS1400 Leese Page 1 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011/00 to 10115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30657 Knotrs Berry Farm 136.50 Employee Deposit Transfer 30658 Labware,Inc. 2,000.00 Lab Training Registration 30659 Liberty Mutual Group 301.92 Workers'Comp. Claim 30660 Liquid Handling Systems 3,929.06 Pumping Supplies 30661 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 373.06 Tools 30662 Mechanical Drives Co. 806.69 Instrument Supplies 30663 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 17,980.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30664 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 30665 Motion Industries 187.56 Pump Supplies 30666 MAG-TROL, Inc. 2,118.37 Electrical Supplies 30667 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 985.00 O&M Training Registration 30668 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 960.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30669 Operation Technology, Inc. 990.00 Engineering Training Registration 30670 Orange County Marshal 434.69 Wage Garnishment 30671 OCEA 539.95 Dues Deduction 30672 US Office of Personnel Management(OPM) 3,050.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30673 Pacific Bell 16.54 Telephone Services 30074 Pacific Mechanical Supply 81.46 Plumbing Supplies 30675 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30676 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 373.95 Mechanical Supplies 3DS77 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 30678 Peace Offoers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 30679 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 1.500.00 Engineering Services J-71-3 30680 Seegot,Inc. 141.96 Lab Supplies 30681 Shade Concepts 10,870.00 Awning Installation-Admin. Bldg. 30682 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 994.85 Tools/Hardware 30683 Southern Calif.APWA 100.00 0&M Meeting Registration 30684 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 326.77 Office Supplies 30685 Super Power Products $46.50 Janitorial Supplies 30686 Voided Check - - 30687 Temperament Research Institute 1.195.00 Technical Services Training Supplies 3D688 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,595.18 Mechanical Supplies 30689 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 30690 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 14,250,00 Temporary Employment Services 30691 Vulcan 1,869.30 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30692 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 287.14 Lab Supplies 30693 WEF 1.000.00 Membership 30694 Stephen J. Burrill 359.92 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 30695 Employee Activity Committee 310.00 Service Award Expense 30696 David A. Ludwln 739.70 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 30697 Boyle Engineering Corporation 61,605.58 Engineering Services 1-2-4 30698 Carollo Engineers 52,107.06 Engineering Services- Membrane/UASB Pilot Test&P2.60 30699 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 52,226.21 Engineering Services-P2-82&Drain Washwater Pilot Projects 30700 Computerized Facility Integration 172.044.24 Engineering Services J-25-1 &Software Maintenance Agreement 30701 Cytec Industries 27,884.25 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-16 Page 2 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/1100 to 10/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30702 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 26,310.05 Belt Filter Press Supplies 30703 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 28.676.37 Medical Insurance Premium 30704 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 98,044.19 Fenic Chloride MO 9-27-95 30705 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 44,783.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 30706 Orange County Water District 72,381.44 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 30707 Synagro West,Inc. 39,555.84 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.96 30708 Power Lift Corporation 29,012.77 2000 Caterpillar HD Industrial Lift Truck 30709 Projects Partners 28,478.93 Temporary Employment Services 30710 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 145,801.97 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 30711 So.Cal.Gas Company 33,906.25 Natural Gas 30712 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 71,323.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 30713 Vulcan 121,904.67 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 30714 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 57,087.46 Caustic Soda MO 8.23.95 30715 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 79,661.46 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 30716 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 291,223.97 Construction 3.38-1 30717 Kan Thompson, Inc. 833,974.84 Construction 11-17.3& 11.20 30718 Diann Construction, Inc. 386,429.00 Construction J-52 30719 Union Bank of California 92,663.86 Construction 11-17-3, Retention 30720 Orange County Sanitation District 37.616.66 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 30721 ATint of Glass 96.00 Window Tinting 30722 A-Plus Systems 3,139.96 Notices&Ads 30723 Advanced Calibration Designs, Inc. 909.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 30724 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 4,947.69 Emissions Monitoring Systems Parts&Supplies 30725 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 3,126.02 Lab Training Registration&Supplies 30726 Air Products&Chemicals 318.13 Lab Supplies 30727 Airborne Express 153.73 Air Freight 30728 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 778.99 Safety Supplies 30729 American Airlines 7,809.00 Travel Services 30730 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 640.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 30731 Applecne Employment Service 1.389.31 Temporary Employment Services 30732 Applied Industrial Technology 1.068.92 Electrical Pans&Supplies 30733 Arcom Electronics, Inc. 3,771.25 Microwave Site Survey 30734 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 30736 Arizona Instrument 3.009.35 Instrument Supplies 30736 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 813.00 Vacuum Truck Services 30737 Awards&Trophies By Bee 42.07 Plaques 30738 ARA Engineering Contractor 481.00 Professional Services- 11-29 30739 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.04 Telephone Service 30740 AWSI 362.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 30741 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service-BI-annual Contract 30742 Battery Specialties 1,685.31 Batteries 30743 Bauer Compressors 5,496.73 Safety Supplies&Equipment 30744 Bob Weaver Painting 570.00 Painting Bldg.H Ceiling 30745 Bush&Associates,Inc. 9,760.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 30746 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 391.66 Rope Page 3 of 8 Claims Paid From 10/1100 to 10/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30747 Cal-Glass,Inc. 488.52 Lab Equipment Service 30748 Carl R.Nelson, P.E. 2,580.00 Engineering Consultant 241 30749 Carleton Engineers&Consultants, Inc. 14.56 Engineering Services-Air Quality 30750 Mark Castillo 1.832.24 MeetingrTmining Expense Reimbursement 30751 Coast Fire Equipment 47.42 Annual Fire Extinguisher Testing/Cert. 30752 Compressor Components Of California 1.326.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30753 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 2,164.39 Electrical Supplies 30764 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.471.33 Plumbing Supplies 30755 Cooper Energy Services 14,234.85 Engine Supplies 30758 Corporate Express 2.603.19 Office Supplies 30757 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 173.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 30768 Voided Check - - 30759 County Wholesale Electric Co. 642.62 Electrical Supplies 30760 Courtyard By Marriott 664.88 O&M Meetingrrralning Expense 30761 Crane America Services, Inc. 2,600.00 Crane Services 30762 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 861.25 CCTV Sewer Inspection 30763 2000 CWEA SRTSC 330.00 O&M Training Registration 30764 David R.Woodm6,Ag Consultant 660.00 Professional Service-Blosolid Sites Soil Sampling&Analysis 30765 David's Tree Service 5,400.00 Tree Malnt. Service 30766 Del Mar Analyllcal 3,138.00 Biosolids Analysis 30767 DeZurik C/O Misco/SouthWesl 1,355.85 Valves 30768 Dionex Corporation 9,633.51 Lab Parts&Supplies 30760 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 498.69 Paint Supplies 30770 DD13 Engineering, Inc. 4.400.00 Temporary Employment Services 30771 DGA Consultants, Inc. 8,984.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 30772 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 19.40 Electrical Supplies 30773 Eagle Aerial Imaging 5,407.50 Software Maintenance Agreement 30774 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 190.00 Medical Screening 30775 Employment Development Dept. 9.864.00 Reimbursable Unemployment Costs 30776 Enchanter, Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 30777 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,003.10 Lab Supplies 30778 ELG Environmental Construction 10,415.00 Cleaning Service Maintenance Agreement-Fuel Tanks 30779 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,060.06 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 30780 F.H.Pumps 435.17 Pump Supplies 30781 FedEx Corporation 361.15 Air Freight 30782 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 3,141.64 Lab Supplies 30783 Flo-Systems, Inc. 3,630.14 Pump Supplies 30784 Forked Engineering& Surveying, Inc. 7,644.88 Engineering Services P-183 30785 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 18,042.78 Long Term Disability Ins. Premium 30780 Fountain Valley Camera 01.41 Photo Supplies 30787 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash . 326.98 Truck Wash Tickets 30788 Fry's Electronics 156.17 Computer Supplies 30789 FLW,Inc. 206.74 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 30700 FM International, Inc. 11,531.93 Professional Service J-25.1 30791 Gales Fiberglass Installers 1,662.79 Fiberglass Repair Page 4of8 E . . Claims Paid From 10/1100 to 10/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30792 Gauge Repair Service 56.23 Gauge Repair 30793 W W Grainger, Inc. 5,693.77 Electrical Pans&Supplies 30794 Gmseby S.T.I. 158.08 Engine Supplies 30795 Grayber Electric Company 7,051.35 Electrical Supplies 30796 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 102.37 Janitorial Supplies 30797 Verizon California 1,37e.50 Telephone Services 30798 Hach Company 4.451.25 Lab Supplies 30799 Halcyon Electric, Inc. 3,530.00 Electrical Supplies 30800 Herold Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 30801 Herb's Slackforest Bakery&Deli 167.75 Meeting Expenses 30802 Hill Brothers 24,580.15 Odor Control Chemical Testing at Seal Beach Pump Sta. 30803 HIM, Inc. 1,693.47 Tools 30804 The Holman Group 1.417.16 Employee Assistance Program Premium 30805 Home Depot 1,147.67 Small Hardware 30806 Hunts'Final Phase 5,938.25 Construction Service-Traffic Signs,Wall Repairs 30807 Hydrotex 1.787.60 Lube Oil 30808 HST Software 747.00 Software 30809 lotus Consultng,L.L.C. '14,085.00 Records Management Program 30810 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,49120 Printing Service 30811 Inalco Degremont.Inc. 143.58 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 30812 Infinity Technology USA 1,207.68 Computer Printer Supplies 30813 Intergraph Corporation 12,701.14 Software Maint.Agreement 30814 Irvine Photo Graphics 5,92 Photographic Services 30815 IBM Corp. 6.076.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 30816 J&B Auto Parts 128.39 Auto Parts&Supplies 30817 J&L Industrial Supply 366.31 Tools 30818 J.D.Edwards 995.00 Finance Training Registration $0819 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 17.411.84 Misc.Construction Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Test Facility Piping 30820 Jaya Catering 1,971.70 Meeting Expenses 30821 Jensen Instruments Co. 1,471.55 Instrument Supplies 30822 Johnstone Supply 691.49 Electrical Supplies 30823 K.S. Dunbar&Associates 5,500.00 Engineering Services 2-41 30824 Kerry Consulting Group 2,993.49 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 30825 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,081.85 Tools&Supplies 3DB26 Lab Support 3,799.38 Temporary Employment Services 30827 Lee&Ro,Inc. 13,740.07 Engineering Consulting Services 5-49,5-50,5-51 &5-52 30828 Lessons in Leadership 867.00 IT Meeting Registration 30829 Liebed Cassidy 287.50 Professional Service-Human Resources 30830 Gerald R.Jones 7,694.48 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 30831 Uniform Center 610.73 Uniforms 30832 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 5,552.31 Boiler Repair 30833 MerVac Electronics 59.51 Instrument Supplies 30834 Matt Chlor,Inc. 2,042.38 Valves 30835 McBain Instruments $11.27 Lab Supplies 30838 McGarry Central 1.240.00 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement Page 5 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30837 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 508.53 Tools 30838 MCRay Industries, Inc. 669.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30839 Mao Analytical System 950.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 30840 Medlin Controls Co. 2,587.91 Instrument Supplies 30841 Mid-West Associates 3,020.62 Pump Supplies 30842 Mission Uniform Service 145.00 Uniform Rentals 30843 Moreland&Associates 5,133.08 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 30844 MotoPhoto 118.96 Photographic Services 30845 MAP 9,830.00 Management Consulting Service 30M MOD Technologies, Inc. 2,477.50 Temporary Flow Monitor 30047 Mine Safely Appliance C/O Meg Systems 4,231.87 Instrument Supplies 30848 National Microcomp Services 1,255.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 30849 Nlckey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14.804.31 LubricantlDlesel Fuel 30850 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 10,131.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 3DB51 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mail Delivery Service 3DB52 Ocean Test Equipment,Inc. 51.55 Lab Supplies 30853 Office Depot Business Services Div. 4,198.87 Office Supplies 30854 Olympus America, Inc. 1,128.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30855 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 815.89 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30856 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 101.65 Plumbing Supplies 30857 Orange County Sanitation District 410.99 Petty Cash Reimb. 30858 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,750.00 Service Agreement 30859 Oxygen Service Company 975.30 Specialty Gases 30860 OCB Reprographics 171.37 Printing Service-Spec P-173 30861 OCV Valve 672.10 Valve Supplies 30862 OI Analytical 298.16 Lab Supplies 30883 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 28.57 Electrical Supplies 30864 Pacific Mechanical Supply 701.e8 Plumbing Supplies 30865 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 1,369.75 Parts&Supplies 30866 Parker Supply Company 4.656.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30867 Antonino Plra 1.197.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30868 Polydyne,Inc. 23,093.59 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 30869 Pool Supply of Orange County 415.97 Operating Supplies 30870 Power Pumps, Inc. 2,310.04 Pump Supplies 30871 Precise Sensor, Inc. 258.60 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30872 Primary Source 1,947.14 Office Furniture 30873 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 1,170.00 Electrical Service Mainl. 30874 Quantum Compliance Systems, Inc. 6,311.82 Softens Maintenance Agreement 30876 Quickoleaning Janitorial Service 90.00 Janitorial Services 30876 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 30877 Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. 294.31 Lab Supplies 30878 Ramsay Corporation 613.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 30879 Rellestar 17,937.52 Employee Medical Health Premium 30880 Reliaster Bankers Security Life Ins. 15,982.38 Life Insurance Premium 30881 Restek Corp 467.71 Lab Supplies Page 6of8 B ' C ' Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30882 Rochester Instrument System 1,344.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30883 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 847.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30884 Roto Rooter-N.O.C.#11 1,694.50 Sewer Line Repair 30885 Ruten&Tucker Attorneys at Law 6,268.92 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 30886 RPM Electric Motors 622.20 Electric Motor Repair 30887 Schwing America, Inc. 3,879.42 Pump Supplies 30888 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 619.25 Specialty Gases 30889 Sears Industrial Sales 63.25 Mechanical Supplies 30890 Second-Sun 729.79 Light Fixtures 30891 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 40.01 Tools 30892 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,613.78 Tools/Hardware 30893 Skalar, Inc. 7,615.00 Lab Supplies 30894 Smith Pipe&Supply 311.85 Plumbing Supplies 30895 So.Calif.Waste Mgmnt.Forum 130.00 Technical Services Training Registration 30898 Soo:-Lynch Corp. 709.90 Janitorial Supplies 30897 SoftVlew Computer Products 871.14 Stationery&Office Supplies 30898 SoftChoice 987.68 Software 30899 Southern California Edison 10,724.21 Power 30900 Spex Cerlprep, Inc. 256.00 Lab Supplies 30901 State Board of Equalization 568.34 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 30902 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 550.00 Landscape Malnt. 30903 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,648.13 Mechanical Supplies 30904 Severn Trent Labomtories(STL)Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 30905 The Meniwcod Corporation 2.292.94 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 30908 The Orange County Register 522.50 Notices&Ads 30907 ThermoOuest Corporation 89.55 Lab Supplies 30908 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,810.05 Mechanical Supplies 30909 Daily Pilot 50.00 Notices&Ads 30910 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,652.00 Lab Services 30911 Teksystems 100.00 Temporary Employment Services 30912 U.S. Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 30913 Ultra Scientific 40.70 Lab Supplies 30914 United Parcel Service 28.62 Parcel Services 30915 Unocal 76 174.58 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-35A Inspection 30976 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 350.00 Conference Registration-Board Member 30917 Valley Cities Supply Company 386.45 Plumbing Supplies 30918 Vortex Industries,Inc. 381.27 Door Repair 30919 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4.960.49 Lab Supplies 30920 The Wackenhut Corporation 12.021.72 Security Guards 30921 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 16,639.15 Safety Supplies 30922 Westport Electric Supply 717.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30923 Wilhelm Electric Co., Inc. 502.00 Construction-Vehicle Charging Station 30924 Xerox Corporation 9,059.29 Copier Leases 30925 The Yakima Company 11,674.82 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 3D926 Union Bank of California 18,718.78 Construction 3-38-1,Retention Page 7 of 8 Claims Paid From 1011100 to 10116/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30927 Chloe D. Doo 1.346.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30928 Me=Polo S.Velasco 431.75 Meeling/Training Expanse Reimbursement 30929 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 345.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 30930 Dean Yokoyama&Dell Computers 2,628.87 Employee Computer Loan Program 30931 Jeffrey D.Gitch 1,768.57 Employee Computer Loan Program 30932 Michael D.Moore 521.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 30933 Orange County Sanitation District 578.74 Pedy Cash Reimb. 30934 Brian K.Reed 390.75 Meeling/rralning Expense Reimbursement 30935 Marco Polo S.Vales= 186.01 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,150,109.30 Payroll Disbursements 20817-2D948 Employee Paychecks $ 157,012.78 Biweekly Payroll 1014100 20949-20955 Employee Paychecks 7,444.05 Adjustments&Termination 53682-64138 Direct Deposit Statements 692.398.13 Biweekly Payroll 1014100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 856,844.96 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Manhattan Bank National Association $ 9,875.97 September Payment on Painewsber Swap 2000 Series A State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA. 872,571.83 September Interest Payment on 1990.92 Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 682,447.80 Total Claims Paid 1011/00-10/15/00 $ 5,689,402.08 Page 8 of 8 .67 , c Claims Paid from 10116100 to 10I31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 30036 American Express 9 36,694.62 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 30937 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 173,432.60 Natural Gas-Spec No.9900-20 30938 County of Orange 850,000.00 Construction Agreement-East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Project 30939 Orange County Sanitation District 423,909.47 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 30940 Southern California Edison 39,879.12 Power 30941 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safely Div. 38.68 Safely Supplies 30942 APWA C/O Psomas 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration 30943 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 49.11 Telephone Service 30944 AT It T Wireless Services-Airtime 70.64 Cellular Telephone Service 30945 Robert M.Bell 264.57 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 3D946 Court Order 516.00 Wage Garnishment 30947 Court Order 20D.00 Wage Garnishment 30948 California Automatic Gate 85.00 Service Agreement 30949 Cappo,Inc. 250.00 Purchasing Training Registration 30950 Court Omer 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30951 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 22,223.92 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process WO 9122199 30952 CMTA 225.00 Accounting Training Registration 30953 CSMFO 25.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 30954 CWEA Membership 10D.00 Notices&Ads 30955 Ecology Tire,Inc. 536.50 Waste Management-Tres 30956 Elsevier Science 942.00 Publication 30957 Employers Group 2.718.48 Membership 30958 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 30959 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 30960 Governmental Accounting Standards Board 380.00 Publication 30961 Verizon California 1,370.63 Telephone Services 30962 Home Depot 26.92 Small Hardware 30963 Information Resources 210.00 Human Resources Service 30904 Inside EPA 650.00 Publication 30965 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 30966 Kronw's Inc. 1.600.00 Users Group Registration 30967 Lexis-Nexls 170.54 Publication 30968 Los Angeles County 1,038.50 Sewer Service Connection Agreement MID 923M 3D969 Luccrs 63.05 Meeting Expense 30970 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 267.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 3D971 Mission Uniform Service 4,342.16 Uniform Rentals 30972 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 7,2D8.00 O&M Training Registration 3D973 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 HR Training Registration 30974 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 30975 OCEA 510.85 Dues Deduction 30976 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 30977 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 30978 Peace Officers Council of CA 891.00 Dues Deduction 30979 Power c/o Dodson&Associates 30.00 Admin.Meeting Registration 3D980 Public Communication of Los Angeles(PCLA) 215.00 Publication Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16100 to 10131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 30981 R&R Instrumentation,Ina 437.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 30982 Shamrock Supply Co., Ina 186.58 Tools 30983 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 30984 Sidnella Villanueva 710.00 Reconciliation Connection Fee Refund 30985 Special Plastic Systems,Ina 2,775.37 Plastic Parts&Supplies 30986 Summit Steel 97.87 Metal 30987 SCAP 16,666.67 Membership 30988 SCCWRP 500.00 ECM Meeting Registration 30989 SHRM 2000 1.160.00 Publication 3D990 Taylor-Dunn 86.30 Electric Cart Parts 30991 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 138.78 Mechanical Supplies 30992 U.S.Composting Council 450.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Expense 30993 The Unisource Corporation 157.56 Office Supplies 30994 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 30995 Layne T.Bamldl 391.25 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 30996 James R. Hams 412.80 Meetingrttaining Expense Reimbursement 30997 Chuck Hodge 465.45 Mee6ng/Training Expense Reimbursement 30998 Matthew P.Smith 421.55 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 30999 Robyn A.Wilcox 328.78 MeelingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 31000 Morris C.Ying 222.27 Meelingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 31001 Jose C.Ambriz 259.64 MeelingrTraming Expense Reimbursement 31002 Catherine M.Biele 132.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31003 Damn L.Gamin 220.11 Meelingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 31DD4 County ofOrenge-Auditor Controller 1,320.DD Reconciliation User Fee Refund 31005 Thomas D.Dodderer 374.77 MeetingiTreining Expense Reimbursement 31006 Employee Activity Committee 60.00 Service Award Expense 31007 Robert P.Ghirelli 122.06 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31008 Tyrone C.Given 208.64 Workers'Comp. Claim 31009 Robert A. Livingston 79.57 Meating/Trzining Expense Reimbursement 31010 Michael D. Moore 582.72 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 31011 Raymond Navarro 296.78 Meetirgrrraining Expanse Reimbursement 31012 Fred J.O'Brien 861.65 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 31013 Walter W.Williams 171.89 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31014 Blue Cross of California 185,360.30 Medical Insurance Premium 31015 Amoco Energy Trading Corporation 244,721.00 Natural Gas Spec. No.9900-28 31016 California Association of Sanitation Agencies 25.000.00 Professional Services-General Counsel 31017 CH2MHill 49,594.23 Engineering Service J-71-4 31018 Delta Dental 47,444.04 Dental Insurance Plan 31019 Gang Equipment&Maintenance 80,775.60 8.5 Ton Industrial Carry Deck Crane 31020 Getinge Castle 25,661.00 Lab Supplies 31021 Haaker Equipment Company 240,806.17 Vector Model 2105 Sewer Cleaning Truck 31022 Kemiron Pacific,Ina 76,886.59 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 31023 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 205,250.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 31024 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 29,005.33 LubricaniuDiesel Fuel 31025 Orange County Water District 247,792.07 Consulting Services-Ground Water Replenishment System 31026 Projects Partners 32.514.19 Temporary Employment Services Page 2 of 7 e. Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10131/00 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 31027 Reellime Systems Corporation 49,697.00 Professional Services-Software Support 31028 SoftChoice 33.830.76 Software 31029 Southern California Edison 31,609.33 Power 31030 The Levis Group 20,818.77 Consulting Service-Project Management Process 31031 Tule Ranch/alagan Farms 83,822.08 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 31032 Vulcan 43,567.45 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-D44 31033 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 44,735.08 Engineering Service J-67 31034 J W Contracting Corporation 252,05S00 Construction P2-60 31035 Margate Construction, Inc. 222,575.00 Construction P2-39 31036 Southern Contracting Company 40,692.00 Construction P2-47.1 &J-33-1 31037 A-Plus Systems 1,353.56 Notices&Ads 31038 Acopian Technical Company 803.81 Instrument Supplies 31039 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 3,436.49 Computer Supplies 31040 Aearo Company 390.50 Safely Supplies 31041 Air Products&Chemicals 13.20 Lab Supplies 31042 Airborne Express 30.39 Air Freight 31043 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safely Div. 2,477.63 Safety Supplies 31044 Alrgas Lyons Safety 90.71 Safety Supplies 31045 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 430.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 31046 Appieone Employment Service 1,641.38 Temporary Employment Services 31047 Applied Industrial Technology 359.52 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31048 Arcus Data Security 204.00 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 31049 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 1,686.15 Waste Removal 31050 Altek Industries,Corp 205.05 Plastic Supplies 31051 AMSA 1,400.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 31052 APEX Communications 12,368.39 Computer Maintenance-Security 31053 ASCE Continuing Education 775,00 Engineering Training Registration 31054 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,000.76 Telephone Service 31055 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 215.42 Telephone Service 31066 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 8,652.07 Electrical Supplies 31057 Battery Specialties 248AS Batteries 31058 Bauer Compressors 315.58 Safely Supplies&Equipment 31059 Boiler&Combustion Seminars,Inc 1,785.D0 O&M Training Registration 31080 Boyle Engineering Corporation 22.017.41 Engineering Services 2-31 &2.50 31061 Bush&Associates,Inc. 960.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 31062 California Automatic Gate 104.39 Service Agreement 31063 California Relocation Services, Inc. 174.80 Office Moving Services 31064 Southern California Marine Institute 11,230.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 31065 California Tattoo Manufacturing Co., Inc 377.48 Printing Service 31086 Caltrol,Inc. 988.71 Electrical parts&Supplies 31067 Cad Warren&Co. 2,057.17 Insurance Claims Administrator 31068 Carollo Engineers 24,466.69 Engineering services-J-25-4 31069 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2,496.61 Instrument Parts 31070 Clickguam Corporation 16,416.62 Printer Service Agreement-Spec.9900-04 31071 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 3,910.08 Professional Sam.- Communication,Safely&Emergency Response Procedures 31072 Computer Sciences Corp. 6,773.85 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31073 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 76.20 Electrical Supplies 31074 Corporate Express 2,252.51 Office Supplies 31075 Cotelligenl 1,249.50 Software Support 31076 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 723.16 Sewer Service Fee Admin. 31077 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,893.61 Electrical Supplies 31078 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 31079 CASA 12&00 ECM Training Registration 31060 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5,282.69 CCTV Sewer Inspection at Huntington Beach 31081 CRISP Automation Systems 750.00 Software&Hardware Maint. 31082 Computational Systems,Inc. (CSI) 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 31083 CWFA Membership 40.00 Membership 31084 David's Tree Service 10,900.00 Tree Meint.Service $1085 Dal Mar Analytical 2,029.00 Biosolids Analysis 31086 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 12,136.96 Computers 31087 Diamond H Recognition 2,536.47 Employee Service Awards 31088 Dionex Corporation 51.25 Lab Supplies 31069 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 455.33 Paint Supplies 31090 DDB Engineering,Inc 10,804.00 Temporary Employment Services 31D91 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 354.67 Electrical Supplies 31092 Eldridge Products 4,054.20 Instrument Supplies&Maintenance 31093 Enchanter, Inc. 2.400.00 Oceen Monitoring MO 5-24-95 31094 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 9,700.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 31095 FedEx Corporation 73.60 Air Freight 31096 Filter Supply Company 443.73 Filters 31097 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,228.50 Lab Supplies 31098 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 123.00 Concrete Cutting 31099 Forked Engineering&Surveying.Inc. 5,572.00 Engineering Services P-183 31100 Fountain Valley Points, Inc. 238.52 Paint Supplies 31101 Franklin Covey 929.51 Office Supplies 31102 Fry's Electronics 549.49 Computer Supplies 31103 FM International, Inc. 11,605.22 Professional Service J-25.1 31104 Gestech 174.80 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 31105 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 20,812.06 Belt Filler Press Supplies 31106 Gilmour Group 13.05 Garden Hose 31107 Government Finance Officers Association 50.00 Publication 31108 VAN Grainger, Inc. 9,494.74 Electrical Pans&Supplies 31109 Graphic Distributors 1,167.24 Photographic Supplies 31110 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1,255.14 Janitorial Supplies 31111 Verizon California 4.163.79 Telephone Services 31112 Harald Primrose Ice 48.00 Ice For Samples 31113 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 203.80 Plumbing Supplies 31114 Herb's Blactdorest Bakery&Deli 231.45 Meeting Expenses 31115 Home Depot 349.58 Small Hardware 31118 Imaging Plus,Inc. 8.50 Printing Service 31117 Irvine Ranch Water District 55,78 Water Use 31118 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31119 Jay's Catering 3,171.37 Meeting Expenses 31120 Jensen Instruments Co. 3,171.26 Instrument Supplies 31121 John Jacobs Associates 524.75 Auto Shop Equipment Repair 31122 Johnstone Supply 131.67 Electrical Supplies 31123 Karen Monaco&Associates 11,562.50 FIS Support Services 31124 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 16,401.00 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 31125 Kensington Electronics 455.78 Electrical Supplies 31126 Kings County Tax Collector 3,273.22 Property Taxes 31127 Industrial Distribution Group 403.97 Paint Supplies 31128 Kronos, Inc. 15.872.16 Software 31129 Lab Support 4,749.71 Temporary Employment Services 31130 Lee&Re,Inc. 12,058.08 Engineering Consulting Services 549,50.51 &5.52 31131 Lexis-Nexis 52.58 Books&Publications 31132 Gerald R.Jones 6,344.10 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 31133 MarVac Electronics 38.07 Instrument Supplies 31134 Mee Analytical System 2,767.50 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 31136 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 31136 Mid-West Associates 6.435.71 Pump Supplies 31137 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,287.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31138 Mission Uniform Service 6,123.47 Uniform Rentals 31139 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 31140 Mine Safety Appliance Co. 2,695.47 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31141 National Plant Services,Inc. 9,750.00 Vacuum Truck Services 31142 National Research Council Canada 1 356.60 Lab Supplies 31143 Neal Supply Co. 2,415.28 Plumbing Supplies 31144 Newark Electronics 479.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31145 City of Newport Beach 49.76 Water Use 31W NAB Associates, Inc. 1.500.20 Lab Services 31147 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 505.31 Steel Tags 31148 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,306.98 Office Supplies 31149 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 316.15 Fittings 31150 Oxygen Service Company 1,326.21 Specially Gases 31151 OCB Reprographics 5,204.30 Printing Service-Spec P-173 31152 OCE-USA,Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment M®Int. 31153 Pacific Bell 1.128.47 Telephone Services 31154 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 31155 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4.682.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 31156 Pagenet 2,026.54 Paging Services 31157 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 22,394.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 31168 Polydyne,Inc. 23,482.63 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 31159 Power Design 2.442.44 Electrical Supplies 31160 Praxair,Inc. 30.79 Lab Supplies 31161 Primary Source 2,486.30 Office Furniture 31162 Pryor Resources, Inc. 224.61 Publication 31163 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. 753.40 Fencing Installation 31164 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.393.48 Trash Removal Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31165 Rellestar 8.397.40 Employee Medical Health Premium 3118e RPM Electric Motors 769.09 Electric Motor Repair 31167 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 961.95 Construction-Sewer Line Cleaning 31168 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 39.00 Publication 31169 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,473.31 Specially Gases 31170 City of Seal Beach 1,166.88 Water Use 31171 Second-Sun 268.69 Light Fixtures 31172 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 173.04 ToolsHfardware 31173 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Chino Basin Watermater Transfer 31174 Sigma Chemical Co. 132.11 Lab Supplies 31175 So.Cal.Gas Company 14.91 Natural Gas 31176 Sow-Lynch Corp 28595 Janitorial Supplies 31177 Sparkletts 2.02017 Drinking WatedCooler Rentals 31178 Strata International,Inc 60546 Chemicals 31179 Sun-Bell Landscape&Maintenance 4.805,00 Landscape Maint. 31180 Surveyors Service Company 45.12 Tools 31181 SCAP 19,000.00 Membership-Southern California Alliance of POTW 31162 SKC•Weal,Inc. 174.72 Safety Supplies 31183 SPEC Services,Inc. 10,123.98 Engineering Services J-33-1 31184 Talavere&Richardson 5,040.00 Consulting Services-Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study 31185 Teledyne Analytical 164.84 Instrument Pans 31186 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 305.24 Mechanical Supplies 31187 Tierra Tractor 6,400.00 Tree Planting Services 31188 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 178.44 Locks&Keys 31189 Toshiba International Corporation 5,263.56 Electrical Supplies 31190 Tren Consulting Engineers 22.350.00 Engineering Services-Small Capital Projects Pl-65 31191 The Trans Company 2.945.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 31192 Transcet 3,185.26 Electrical Supplies 31193 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 60.91 Truck Supplies 31194 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,800.00 Lab Services 31195 Teksystems 400.00 Temporary Employment Services 31196 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 31197 Ultra Scientific 162.00 Lab Supplies 31198 Union Bank of California 444.09 Banking Services 31199 United Parcel Service 694.75 Parcel Services 31200 Valley Cities Supply Company 746.76 Plumbing Supplies 31201 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 318.07 Mechanical Supplies 31202 Veme's Plumbing 50.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 31203 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,342.90 Vision Service Premium 312D4 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,438.66 Lab Supplies 31205 The Wackenhut Corporation 2,999.64 Security Guards 31206 The Well Street Joumal 74.35 Subscription 31207 Western States Chemical,Inc. 16,106.46 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 31208 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 10,688.38 Electrical Supplies 31209 Xerox Corporation 596.68 Copier Leases 31210 The Yakima Company 15,830.18 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 Page 6 of 7 0 Claims Paid From 10/16/00 to 10/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 31211 Zymark Corporation 897.32 Lab Supplies 31212 Deon M.Carrico 340.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31213 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr. 314.75 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 31214 Timothy D.Foley 202.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31215 Tan E.Gaworaki 227.71 Meeling/iraining Expense Reimbursement 31216 Roy A.Handy 359.08 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 31217 Michael Reideler 230.13 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 31218 Mary S.Thompson 331.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31219 Jane H.Tran 260.17 Meelingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 31220 County Clerk 38.00 Filing Fee 31221 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210.00 Administrative Fees 31222 Janice Debay 194.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 31223 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 LAFCO Fees 31224 Orange County Sanitation District 1,213.12 Petty Cash Reimb. 31225 Vern Phonsiri 1,949.18 Employee Computer Loan Program 31226 State Bard of Equalization 350.D0 Annexation Fee 31227 James G,Thus 356.24 Meetingrtralning Expense Reimbursement 31228 Yu-Ll Tsai 3,000.DD Employ"Computer Lan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,561,958.84 Payroll Disbursements 20958-21069 Employee Paychecks $ 157,528.41 Biweekly Payroll 10/4100 21070.21071 Employee Paychecks 3.946.01 Termination 54139-54690 Direct Deposit Statements 707,752.09 Biweekly Payroll 10/4100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869,225.51 Total Claims Paid 10/16/00-10131100 $ 5,431,183.35 Page 7 of 7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS McMnYDZM To80 rr/rsroo°r01• AGENDA REPORT 7em Numbe Ram Number3) 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD -13, HAXTON ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from J. R. Haxton requesting annexation of 1.21 acres of territory to the Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Brier Lane and Cowan Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-20, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the Orange County Sanitation District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD -13, Haxton Annexation). SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) received a request from J. R. Haxton to annex a 1.21 acre parcel to the District, located at 10082 Brier Lane in Orange County. There is an existing house on the property. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of$8,950.00 includes the following: District Processing Fee $500.00 LAFCO Processing Fee $1,150.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $350.00 Revenue Area Study Fee $100.00 Notice of Exemption Filing Fee $38.00 Annexation Acreage Fee $3,982.00 Permit House Connection Fee (5 bedrooms) $2,530.00 Permit Lateral Inspection Fee $300.00 TOTAL FEE TO ANNEX $8,950.00 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. lone item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated after the District consolidation. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS Exempt (Notice of Exemption was filed on 10/26/00). ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:jak H'\wg dla4gendaOmn!Agenda Repwts\2"Board Agenda RepoAsMWWem 9(a),d= Page 2 Black:595%5953 Modules:69,79;70 1 EXHIRIT'A' 2 3 OCSD-13"HAXTON"ANNEXATION NO.DA00-20 4 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT s 6 Lot 29 and that portion of Brier Lane(formerly Cowan Heights Drive)as shown on Tract No. 7 3021, recorded in Book 92,pages 5 through 9 inclusive of Miscellaneous maps,records of a Orange County,together with that portion of Block 15 of Irvine's Subdivision as shown on a 9 map recorded in Book 1,page 88 of said Miscellaneous maps,in the Unincorporated Territory, 10 County of Orange, State of California more particularly described as follows: 11 BEGINNING at an angle point in the existing boundary of the Orange County Sanitation 12 District as established by the"Exclusion",adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors 13 on December 17, 1958, said angle point being described as"on the Northwesterly line of Cowan 14 Heights Drive,40.00 feet in width,as shown on a map recorded in Book 36,page 23,of Records 15 of Survey of said County; THENCE Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of Cowan 16 Heights Drive...", said angle point also being at the Northeasterly terminus of that certain course 17 shown as"North 50'52'47"East, 126.72 feet"on the Northwesterly line of said Tract No. 3021, 18 said angle point also being North 46`35'16"West, 1129.24 feet from Orange County 19 Surveyor's Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 3237, having a coordinate value(U.S. Survey 20 foot)of North 2229707.794 and East 6099373.821 based upon the California Coordinate System 21 (CCS83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD(1991.35 epoch O.C.S. GPS Adjustment)as shown on Record of 22 Survey 92-1033,filed in Book 150,pages 24 through 35 inclusive of Records of Survey in the 23 office of said County Recorder; 24 THENCE leaving said existing boundary, South 39'07'13"East,40.00 feet to the Northerly 25 Pagel of 3 EXHIBIT'A' 2 3 OCSD-13 "HAXTON" ANNEXATION NO. DA00.20 4 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 6 comer of said Lot 29; 7 THENCE along the Northeasterly line of Lot 29 and the Southeasterly line of said Lot 29 and 8 it's Southwesterly prolongation the following described courses: South 31'31'16"East, 161.81 9 feet; 10 THENCE South 42°07'30" West,261.37 feet to a point on the Southwesterly right of way of t 1 said Brier Lane; 12 THENCE along said Southwesterly right of way of Brier Lane, North 32'l7'24"West, 82.48 13 feet to an angle point in the existing boundary of said Orange County Sanitation District as 14 established by "Maude Annexation to Sanitation District No. T', said angle point being at the 15 Northeasterly terminus of that certain course described as"South 71°52'55" West, 90.00 feet"on 16 the Southeasterly boundary of said annexation; 17 THENCE along said existing boundary per said annexation and per aforementioned"Exclusion" t8 in a general Northeasterly, Northwesterly, Southwesterly,Northwesterly, Southeasterly and 19 Northeasterly direction to the Point of Beginning. 20 21 The above described parcel of land contains 1.21 acres, more or less. 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 3 E3HIBIT'A' 2 3 OCSD-13 "HAXTON"ANNEXATION NO. DA00-20 4 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5 6 7 This proposal was prepared by me or under my direction. g <JW O S.(yiC� 9 1 Robert Je ' c, P.L.S. 6803 No.LS 9803 10 My license expires 9/30/2004 FX.9/3p/0¢ \ e �CF CAVFOP 12 13 This proposal does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyors Office. 14 Dated tj ' �� day of GL_T 2000. 15 16 Jo ry u anas, Counrveyo P. .S.4408 y�oOL-LAN , 17 license expires 9/30/01 Qr� , 18 n tp, MO!0 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 of 3 4 BLOCKS( 5859, SSS3 EXHIBIT "B" SHEET I OF I WOMB. 62.79 70 OCSD-13 "HAXTON" ANNEXATION NO. DAOO-20 TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RS.36123 \N` / GL HRn LN. Y (FORMERLY COWAN HEIGHT P- S RI ✓/�` �GL HIGHCLIFF DR NW'LY. R/W BRIER LN / \ ORANGE COUNTY P.O.B. LOT 1J SANITATION DISTRICT N�c 39.07.13•E 48.88' TR.x0.JOV PER "EXCLUSION" Al 1i N'LY. COX. LOT 29 yp,g�/5g f ADOPTED � .OF EUFV. y60�'�' , �„`%"'.,�.... e e ! ell,-1.0 Yd NW'LY. LINE TR. 3021 si. —�Lor Y. „ D•y ll 1`�j �a���'�"' +3 �r:O wilt 1 4.Pgy LOT l il'll e°l s yJ. \Y :ACRES CR /r COWAN HEIGHTS DR, ,d. !!A, JlaJ I ,wx.wrJam ••°^ RANCEv�w DR MAUDE ANNEX ( '+` SE•tr. LINE LOT 19 A 1•J.7://Oil J1 VLX.ho , LOT 2+ , 0' ioo' 200 N32-17.24-W 82.68' ORS NONR 1 5N'LY. R/M BRIER L PER R/S RXS 92- GRAPHIC SCALE R.59.140/2i•35]S LEGEND N2229707.794 EXISTING BOUNDARY E6099373.821 ANNEXATION BOUNDARY VA'0y (y�m� y TNG/Xx,l wlaA X lw Ey my w uMer my NA.LBNq7 7Na WN WwW A IAf aRN"of Am ONw Cwmy SUNWW,O771R6 O M d ea5!7MOf a a��.--wrnwvn R Jew.PL 650J AN/I.Wxd/N 9/30/00 anss a+prN 9/! /q P40B +,R"F"" DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, October 25, 2000 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, October 25, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (t) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Guy Carrozzo, Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peter Green, Vice Chair Don Hughes Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Dan Cassidy Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Ryal Wheeler Jim Silva, County Supervisor Jon Thomsic Jan Debay, Past Chair of the Board Tom Dawes Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT: Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finance Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the September 27, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 October 25, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode reported that he and Jim Colston will be attending the CASA long- range planning session Thursday and Friday, October 26-27. He also announced that he has invited Orange County's elected Sacramento and Washington representatives to a December 14 luncheon meeting for a bi-partisan discussion of local urban runoff, upstream runoff, tainted beaches and watershed management issues. He indicated that the goal of the meeting was to educate, bring awareness of how big the problems are, and to move legislators to action. He also reported that there is a meeting scheduled on November 3 to meet Kings County supervisor Tony Oliveira and staff members. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that NexTel Communications has requested a lease to install a cellular tower at Plant 2. This will require Coastal Commission approval. The lease will be presented to the OMTS Committee in December for review. Director Debay requested that before this is approved, the homeowners on the south side of the Santa Ana River should be noticed. Mr. Anderson and Director Green will attend an all-day meeting on Friday with SAW PA's five boards on drought-proofing the watershed. Mr. Anderson is also meeting with Supervisor Taviaglone's aide, John Field to discuss our preliminary interest in a biosolids composting she in western Riverside County. Jim Stahl, General Manager of Los Angeles County Sanitation District and Mr.Anderson are meeting with Pat McCarthy, owner of Liberty Ranch and the San Joaquin Composter facility,to discuss the sale of the property and the upcoming consideration of a blosolids ordinance in Kings County. A. Status of Kern County-Kings County Blosolids Program Mike Moore updated the members on the ongoing biosolids program activities. There has been no action by the court on the CEOA-rslated Kern County blosolids ordinance lawsuit. There is a meeting October 31 with the Kings County Board of Supervisors. The District will be attending as interested properly owners. Mr. Moore mentioned that the Kings County Farm Bureau is opposing the application of Class B biosolids. B. Status of due diligence efforts on purchase of Liberty Ranch and San Joaquin Composter Mike Moore reported the results of the due diligence to date. The appraisal has been received; comps have been identified on other composting sites; an Interview was held with biosolids site development experts; the ranch has been inspected; soils samples have been taken; and an environmental assessment of the ranch and water rights is underway. A capacity analysis was done and the LACSD offer was reviewed. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. w_ Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 October 25,2000 (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. IRWD proposal for three-part staging of GWRS Phase 1 Tom Dawes and Jim Herberg provided an overview of the IRWD proposal as outlined in the IRWD staff report attached to a letter from the Water Producers Association, The idea behind the proposal is to down-size the initial capacity of the GWRS and delay construction of the pipeline up the Santa Ana River. The proposal calls for stretching Phase 1 out several years and dividing it Into 3 sub-phases. The first sub- phase includes injecting the GWRS water into new well fields in the area of Fountain Valley, Garden Grove and Santa Ana; applies all grant funds received towards the proposed first phase(1 a); and assigns about 85%of the costs of that phase to the Sanitation District. Mr. Dawes said that the proposed project will not provide an independent source of water nor improve water quality in the Anaheim Forebay. A presentation on the proposal will be made at the next FAHR Committee meeting November 8. Director Debay asked that staff prepare separate visuals for that meeting comparing the two projects. B. Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli provided an update on the status of the report on the Phases 1 and 2 studies. A draft of the report should be available by the end of November. A group of experts from across the country will critique the draft at a two-day meeting November 9 and 10. At this time staff is working on a communications strategy for addressing the results. Mr. Ghirelli also discussed some of the preliminary findings of the report. A detailed report will be given to the Steering Committee at its November 15 meeting, a day before the report is released to the public. C. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in November The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in November were reviewed. Director McGuigan announced that the November 1, 2000 OMTS Committee meeting would be held at Plant 2 and begin at 4 p.m.with a tour. (9) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Blake Anderson complimented Ryal Wheeler and Jon Thomsic and their colleagues on their efforts negotiating the SPMT agreement. Their cooperation and professionalism was appreciated by all involved. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 October 25, 2000 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for November 15, 2000 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for November 15, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:30 p.m., pursuant to Govemment Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with Govemment Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Items Nos. 13.A.1,-2, and -3. At 6:59 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. ubmitted by::r' Id CJ a Tappan ring Committee Secretary N`+`Rm le9enMtSlenlM fngmmeegp -1025W Sc I.fnNe:tlec y' Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2000— 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 1, 2000, in the District's Operations Center at Plant No. 2, 22212 Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach, California. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Staff Present: Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Jan Debay, Past Board Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Anna Piercy Robert Ooten, Director of Operations&Maintenance Charles E. Sylvia Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager Paul Walker Nick Arhontes Terri Josway Directors Absent: Mark Esquer, 0&M Process Support Manager Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Mark A. Murphy (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the September 11, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Directors Jan Debay, Anna Piercy, and Charles Sylvia abstained. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance +� , and Technical Services Committee Page 2 November 1, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair thanked staff for the tour at Plant No. 2 held prior to the meeting. Chair McGuigan then requested Director Ferryman to lead the December 6 OMTS meeting as she will be unavailable. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported staff met with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) regarding the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) and the costs involved with that relocation. Blake Anderson also reported that he and Jim Stahl, General Manager of Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, recently met with Pat McCarthy,the owner of Liberty Ranch and San Joaquin composting sites in Kings and Kern Counties, respectively. Mr. McCarthy was advised the District would not be interested in his offer of the sites if he continues to try to get Class B biosolids banned in Kings County. Chair Norm Eckenrode and Blake also recently met with two of the supervisors in Kings County and reiterated the District's commitment to environmental stewardship in its operations within the county. Synagro, one of the District's biosolids contractors, has approached the District to invest in a composting site south of Corona that has not been well received in the community. The site could handle all of the District's compost, and the location is more convenient than the sites in Kings and Kem Counties. The District is also looking into greenbelt applications of our compost within the county. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance reported that the rainfall received to date has not affected District operations. Staff recently trained on peak flow training procedures. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services reported on the$107,500 fine imposed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)with regard to a recent spill. The RWQCB is interested in developing an environmental project into which approximately 80%of the fine money would be placed. One possible study would be a modeling project to predict the rate of transport of sewage spilled into storm channels and its impact on the beaches. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Y Page 3 November 1, 2000 (11) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS00-37 Recommend to Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-— Approving the Fifth Amended Joint Powers Agreement with Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), providing for initial term of the agreement of one year with a total term of four years including extensions effective July 1, 2001 through June 30,2005 with District's contribution not to exceed$1,223,000 over the four-year term. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS00-38: FY 2000/01 Operational Research Program and Status Ed Torres gave a brief update on the projects that are a part of the District's research program, which help towards identifying new technology that will improve efficiency and reduce costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the two treatment plants. The program also conducts research to support regulatory compliance altematives, regulatory flexibility, improve safety and support wastewater reclamation and reuse programs. b. OMTSOO-39: US EPA's proposed regulations on Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) of sanitary sewer systems Nick Arhontes spoke to the Directors regarding new EPA regulations that will be published for final public comment that have significant financial impacts on all public agencies that own sanitary sewer systems. C. OMTSOO-40: Safety Program Status Report Teri Josway, Safety and Emergency Response Manager, gave a brief report on the District's overall safety program. d. OMTS00-41: Huntington Beach Activities Update Bob Ghirelli reported that the final Phase II report is not yet finalized. He just received a draft copy of the report. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 November 1, 2000 (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for December 6, 2000 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by: P Penny M. K I Operations, Maintenance aW Technical Services Committee Secretary HAwpAle�gsnda\OMTWK0WinWm%110100 Minules.dw OMITS COMMITTEE r�ngoae Tu9d.Mar. 1 uo112 a/isimoo AGENDA REPORT imm Number r1 mNumber orrrsoo-n rzr i Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: George Robertson, Senior Scientist SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-28 APPROVING THE FIFTH AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board to Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-28, approving the fifth amended Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), providing for the initial term of the agreement of one year, with a total term of four years, including extensions starting July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2005 with the District's contribution not to exceed $1,223,000.00 over the four- year term (see attached table for yearly breakdown). SUMMARY The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) was established in 1969 under a joint powers agreement (JPA) by five major wastewater ocean dischargers in southern California to study the effects of discharging treated effluent to the marine environment. The District was a founding member of SCCWRP and has remained actively involved in funding and participating in cooperative research ever since. This JPA has been renewed four times, the last being on July 1, 1997. This fifth JPA will begin on July 1, 2001 and extend until June 30, 2005. Benefits of SCCWRP to the District include the development of new environmental testing methods, staff training and development, and assistance in the collection and analysis of environmental samples. The District also benefits indirectly due to the recognition of SCCWRP as an objective and effective environmental research group. This recognition has garnered the respect and support from local, state and federal agencies, independent researchers, the environmental community, and media. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Fiscal Year OCSD Funding Amount FY2001-2002 $ 284,000 FY2002-2003 $ 298,000 FY2003-2004 $ 313,000 FY2004-2005 $ 328,000 TOTAL: $ 1,223,000 H'1wp.JbpryWByN ApeMe Reph\]ONBmM.1eMr MWb\11NNT 1]�c�Cm PMr.l:YNRB Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) r ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SCCWRP Background., The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRP) is a joint powers agency focusing on marine environmental research. Created in 1969 by the five major wastewater ocean dischargers in southern California, SCCWRP's overall goal is to gather the necessary scientific information so that its member agencies can effectively, and cost-effectively, protect the southern California marine environment. SCCWRP was established by the Orange County Sanitation District (District), the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the City of Los Angeles, the City of San Diego, and the Ventura Regional Sanitation Districts (which has since withdrawn). It was reorganized in 1990 to include representatives of the regulatory community to the governing commission overseeing the activities of wastewater treatment agencies. SCCWRP's nine-member commission, made up of representatives from each of the four remaining wastewater agencies (Orange County Sanitation District, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, City of Los Angeles, and City of San Diego) and five regulatory agencies (EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board and the three Regional Water Quality Control Boards in coastal southern California), represents a unique partnership of members that discharge to the ocean and those that regulate discharge, working together to protect the marine environment. SCCWRP Objectives: The current objectives of SCCWRP are: • To develop, participate in, and coordinate programs to understand ecological systems in the coastal waters and to document relationships between these systems and human activities; • To answer the questions regarding the Southern California coastal waters: • Is it safe to swim? • Is it safe to eat the fish? • Is the ecosystem healthy? • Are the natural resources being protected? • To effectively communicate research findings and recommendations, through a variety of media, to decision makers and other stakeholders; • To continuously examine the composition and structure of SCCWRP to enhance the ability of the organization in achieving its mission; • To serve as a catalyst in forming partnerships and alliances which further these goals; and R..y aeaa.neam.,e na..m a.wmzmomam�v..a.R.1.1 Imw 12(q az R—...a. a Page 2 • To provide an information management system to archive, retrieve, analyze, and display SCCWRP data in order to achieve the above goals and enhance the V overall understanding of the Southern California Bight. Benefits to District The benefits to the District for funding SCCWRP fall into three general categories. First is research. SCCWRP undertakes both basic and applied research on the impacts of humans to the coastal environment. These research efforts have led to the development of, for example, new or revised environmental tests (sediment toxicity) and indices (Benthic Response Index) that can and have been used by the District—and our regulators —to evaluate the impact of our discharge to the local receiving waters. Many of these studies are undertaken as cooperative studies with District staff. Second is staff development. SCCWRP staff and associated independent researchers working with SCCWRP provide a unique source of information on the coastal marine environment. Networking with these individuals and groups at meetings and seminars hosted by SCCWRP allows District staff an opportunity to develop their skills and understanding of the coastal zone. The third benefit that SCCWRP provides is direct assistance to the District in the form of staff and survey equipment to help in the collection and analysis of field samples. Finally, the District also benefits indirectly from SCCWRP's reputation as an innovative, cost effective and objective environmental research group. Over the years its work and researchers have earned both respect nationally and internationally. Today, local, state and federal agencies—as well as various environmental groups and print media (newspapers)—look to SCCWRP to provide objective analyses of problems and issues associated with the urbanized coastal zones, such as Orange County. Examples of recent SCCWRP and District co-operative efforts include: • Bight98 Regional Monitoring: SCCWRP has coordinated the 1998 regional monitoring of the Southern California Bight (Point Conception to the US- Mexican border) that allows the District—as well as other dischargers to the Bight—to place their ocean monitoring findings into a regional perspective. A District representative is co-chair of the Steering Committee and other staff are active on the regional technical groups. • Cooperative studies: In the last two years alone, SCCWRP and the District have developed and worked on several co-operative studies to evaluate different sampling methods. These include a pilot study of the ocean microlayer, measuring organic chemicals in the water column, aging fish used in studying disease and evaluating different sediment analysis techniques. • In-sourcing of OMP. SCCWRP has been a strategic resource in in-sourcing the chemistry work element for the Districts Core ocean monitoring program. SCCWRP has provided ESL staff with assistance in developing chemistry analysis protocols so that sediment and tissue chemistry can now be done internally. SCCWRP also provides sediment reference material and holds H Wp.lbYpenEa�vN ApeMa fle{ark\1NJBmN yeMe PeporbNlpA'am la�q.erc flan..,. vmae Page 3 periodic chemistry intercalibration exercises to improve data comparability between southern California marine laboratories. • Program development SCCWRP is presently finishing up a project to design a "Model POTW Monitoring Program" for the four large southern California POTWs. This new monitoring program will standardize the monitoring done to make data to improve data comparability, eliminate unnecessary monitoring and recommend a program that combines routine compliance monitoring with regional and special studies. • Huntington Beach Expert Panel: SCCWRP moderated and chaired the expert panel that reviewed the District's efforts to discover the bacterial source impacting Huntington Beach in the summer of 1999. • Oceanography/Modeling: SCCWRP is currently assisting the District in evaluating its current receiving water monitoring. Proposed future monitoring will include incorporating real-time oceanographic measurements with predictive models. SCCWRP will help in the design of the moorings that will contain the instrumentation and participate in improving existing or developing new models to apply to our wastewater discharge. SCCWRP Funding: The SCCWRP Commission's goal is to increase the research on urban runoff and stormwater and has directed the Executive Director of SCCWRP to expand the participation in SCCWRP to include agencies and businesses that contribute to urban runoff and, consequently, on the quality of the marine environment. Proposed funding for the fifth JPA is based upon a formula that maintains a funding ratio of 50/50 between POTW and contract funds. The POTW commitment is shared equally among the four wastewater signatories. Table 1 lists the JPA funding requirements: Table 1. POTW funding requirements for the 5" Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority Joint Powers Agreement Agency FY2001-2002 FY2002-2003 FY2003-2004 FY2004-2005 City of Los Angeles $ 284,000 $ 298,000 $ 313,000 $ 328,000 Orange County 294,000 298,000 313,000 328,000` Sanitation District San Diego 264,000 298,000 313,000 328,000 Los Angeles County 284,000 298,000 313,000 328,000 District TOTAL $1,136,000 $1,192,000 $1,252,000 $1,312,000 H.,.meuma""aavb.,env""a.xewns�aao eo.,e nae"m a".o,un,aon"m,x¢I ez A,"� Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Y District staff recommends approval of the fifth amended Joint Powers Agreement for the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. The initial term of the agreement is one year, with a total term of four years including extensions. ALTERNATIVES CEOA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS H:1wp.JmYpenJ We de Rep,b\1091 W/ ft Rep %11W 11(4M1 iwe,d: ena.,m Page 5 i4 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, November 2, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, November 2,2000, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Guy Carrozzo Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Brian Donahue John Linder, Construction Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Gerald Sigler Andrei loan, Project Manager Jan Debay, Past Board Chair Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Lynn Daucher Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Christina Shea (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 5, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as revised. Director Patterson abstained. PDC Committee Minutes , Page 2 November 2, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the due diligence underway on Liberty Ranch in Kings County. On Friday, November 3, Board Chair Norm Eckenrode and Blake will hold an introductory meeting with Kings County supervisor Tony Oliviera. Staff is looking at a composting site in Riverside County,which has had problems with odors. If feasible,we may consider an operating partnership. Our involvement may be welcomed by local political interests because of the technical and financial competency we can bring to the project. This is an attractive site because of its proximity and would result in a less expensive long-term solution. Staff will be meeting with the local politicians and the city of Riverside. The one issue, regardless of where our biosolids are taken is whether we would be willing to use a portion of the resulting material here in Orange County. This would blunt some of the criticism we hear from agricultural interests from other counties. Director Debay asked to attend future meetings with the local Riverside representatives, if possible. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering did not make a report. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Construction Manager reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there were no professional service agreements and only three addenda approved by the General Manager under his delegation of authority. Director Patterson questioned the number of addenda that are being presented just under the$25,000 General Manager's authority limit. M PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 November 2, 2000 (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there was one addendum issued in the past month. (12) SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Andrei loan updated the Committee members on activities since the agenda report was written. Tentative approval has been granted by the railroad to put the pipe in their right of way using conventional tunneling methods. Yorba Linda has announced that they plan to do some street improvements (raised median)in the area. A letter will be sent requesting that they delay this work until the pipeline project is constructed. Mapping is done. The SAWPA alternative is being considered by Engineering. It calls for keeping the line in place through the golf course. it was revealed that the preferred alignment goes through two areas where private property extends into the river and therefore sixty-nine easements will be necessary. The geotechnical findings show that there are more alluvial deposits than anticipated, and auger boring will be done to help determine boulder locations. The schedule is on track and the mapping finished ahead. The project is on budget. Brown and Caldwell is preparing a proposal to write the report, to prepare easement acquisition documents and to perform additional geotechnical investigations. The addendum will go to PDC next month. Lisa Lawson, communications manager, reported that the public outreach has started. A time line is being developed to help provide information to the public. A general letter will be sent to all residents in January after meetings with the city councils. Separate letters requesting personal meetings will be sent to property owners where easements are required. Director Anderson asked if there were any mitigation measures that have been identified. Hospital- type mufflers will be required on all equipment, temporary sound walls will be required and a biologist will be on site during the construction. Director Patterson questioned how the project would be paid for. This still has not been determined. Blake Anderson reported on his meeting with two SAWPA directors from one of its member agencies to discuss the merits of the project. They indicated that they are willing to work on contributing their agency's share of the SAWPA share. One option is for the District to pay for the whole project and then try to get SAWPA to repay their share. Director Anderson mentioned setting a drop dead date for securing funding commitment from SAWPA. It was mentioned that SAWPA has paid for its share of the design costs. Blake Anderson and Andrei loan have been invited to discuss the technical aspects of the project with the SAWPA Board. At that time, a commitment could be requested. A report will be made at next month's meeting on any changes. In the meantime, staff will continue to push everything forward until the Board approves the project. PDC Committee Minutes z Page 4 November 2, 2000 (13) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg provided an update on the cost of the project as the 30% design level is about finished. In December 1999 Phase 1 was estimated at$356 million, now it is$352 million. The acre-foot charge was $500 in 1999 and is now$433. At the November 8 FAHR Committee meeting, staff will be presenting a report on the IRWD alternative proposal, which calls for splitting Phase 1 into three phases and would only reach to mid- county at the end of ten years, not extend to north county. It appears that MWD water pricing is the major issue facing the program. But this is the only'new'water project on the horizon. At the FAHR Committee meeting, staff will be answering the question on the comparative project costs for OCSD only and continue the process. (14) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. PDC00-75 Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2,and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent,Job No.J-53,with SS Mechanical Corporation,authorizing an addition of$125,074, and a time extension of 105 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,528,233. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. PDCOO-76 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to provide inspection, engineering services, and prepare a report on the structural integrity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-2-4; Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-17; and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $900,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. PDC00-77 (1) Establish a budget for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition,Job No. P1-83, in the amount of$1,488,000;and (2) Authorize Staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for design services for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1-83. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. j PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 November 2, 2000 d. PDC00-78 Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-66, providing for additional services,for an additional amount of$224,153, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to$649,073. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. At 6:25 p.m., Directors Green and Eckenrode left the meeting. (15) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (a) a. PDC00-79 U.S. EPKs Proposed Regulations on Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance (CMOM)of Sanitary Sewer Systems. Nick Arhontes made a brief presentation covering the upcoming CMOM regulations that should be released for final public comment in November. Major changes that are expected to impact local cities and agencies: an EPA permitting mechanism for the local systems;a written management plan for each system covering capacity assurance; design standards; mapping; operations and maintenance plans including repair programs; sanitary sewer overflow(SSO)response and notification plans. An auditing process will also be included as well as mandatory fines for non-compliance. Growth restrictions may also be imposed for non-compliance. A copy of the presentation was provided at the meeting. Director Debay encouraged the directors to discuss the proposed program with their city staff. District staff will again be meeting with the cities and agencies between November and February as part of the regular Collection Systems Outreach Program. The CMOM issues will be discussed again as part of these meetings. At 6:38 p.m., Director Debay left the meeting. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. e PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 November 2, 2000 (17) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (19) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (20) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 7, 2000 at 5 p.m. (21) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Submitted by: ✓I / J appan PoaCommittee Secretary x:w.y.evuye�,wawocwarunous�iiozao roc m�nmea.eec PDC COMMMEE Mee ng Dae To W of oil. 11-24)0 11-15-M AGENDA REPORT Item Numtw Item Num!mr PDC00-75 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: CHEMICAL FACILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P146-2, AND CHEMICAL FLOW PACING FOR PRIMARY INFLUENT, JOB NO. J-53 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P146-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$125,074, and a time extension of 105 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,528,233. SUMMARY Change Order No. 3 includes two items of added work to Job No. P1-46-2. There is a 105 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date June 22, 1999 Original Contract Completion Dale June 22, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date February 6, 2001 Actual Completion Date NA Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $2,229,251.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 173,908.00 This Change (CO No. 3, Add) $ 125,074.00 Change Orders to Date $ 298,982.00 Percentage Increase to Date 13.41% Final Contract Price $2,528,233.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 5F, CIP Reclamation Plant No. 1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project permanently replaces the chlorine odor control and plant water disinfection at Plant No. 1 with hydrogen peroxide and bleach facilities and replaces four existing ferric chloride pumps, which have reached the end of their useful life. The plans and specifications were prepared by Black and Veatch, and the contract was awarded to SS Mechanical Corporation on April 28, 1999. The contract work is 99% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 3: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Furnish And Install Flowmeters at $111,315 85 Design Change Influent Trunkline H2O2 Facility 2 Additional Programming For H2O2 $13.759 20 Design Change Facilities Total —Change Order No. 3 $125,074 105 Item No. 1 includes the furnishing and installation of eight electronic flowmeters with associated piping, electrical, and instrumentation. The flowmeters will provide the ability to automatically meter and monitor the hydrogen peroxide chemical being pumped into the trunk lines at the Metering and Diversion Structure. Adding the flowmeters will ensure proper and adequate amounts of chemicals to reduce odors and disinfect the water. ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEOA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order JBF:Ic Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Chemical Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1 JOB NOS. P1-46-2 AND J-53 THIS REQUEST ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASH AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED BUDGET EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE DUOGET TOO DATE E INCREASE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION TO GATE TO DATE(k) Design Staff $ 20,400 It 289,987 $ 289.987 $ 289,987 $ 280,987 97% Consultant PSA I $ 765,900 $ 577.714 1 $ 577.714 $ 577.714 $ 488.729 85% Construction Staff $ 507.200 $ 507.20D $ 507,200 $ 507,200 $ 475,635 94% Construction Contact $ 2,567,200 $ 2,810.946 $ 2.810,946 $ 125.074 $ 2.810.946 S 2.016.081 72% Construction(Other) $ 46,200 $ 49,453 $ 49,453 $ 49,453 $ 40,166 81% Continuenm $ 328,400 TOTAL It 4,235.300 $ 4,235,300 $ $ $ 4,235,300 $ - $ 125,074 $ 4,235,300 1 $ 3,301,598 78% H 1wpWlalengYabsawnba s%Pl 46 2%budgel W W1 xis CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Chemical Facility Modifications and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent Job Nos. P1-46-2 and J-53 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 0 6/2 212 0 0 0 $ 2,229,251.00 $ 2,229,251.00 0.00% 365 365 CO NO. 1• 06/30/2000 $ 89,742.00 $ 2,318,993.00 4.03% 124 489 CO NO. 2•• 08/03/2000 $ 84,166.00 $ 2,403,159.00 7.80% 0 489 CO NO. 3 I Pending 1 $ 125,074.00 1 $ 2,528,233.00 13.41% 105 594 'Approved by GM per delegated aulhwlly by Board Revoluton 99-23 -Approved by PDC per delegated authority by Board Revolution 99�23 H:W,,dlabn&be and conlrecMPI-de-2lChenge OrdeMCOl.slalusAs Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: November 2. 2000 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. Pt-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacina for Primary Influent, Job No, J-53 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $125.074.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. 151-46-2 ITEM 1 — FURNISH AND INSTALL FLOWMETERS AT THE INFLUENT SEWER AND TRUNKLINE ODOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE (H2O2) FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 1. The Contractor was directed to furnish and install eight (8)flowmeters and associated piping at the Influent Sewer and Trunkline Odor hydrogen peroxide (1-1202) injection facility at Plant No. 1. The additional work included labor and materials to install eight 1/8-inch ChemMag flowmeters and analog transmitters, 80 feet of Y.-inch type 316 stainless steel pipe and fittings, 300 feet of%-inch and 1-inch electrical conduit and fittings,wire and terminations. Also included in this item is the substitution of 3 two-way valves for 1 five-way valve, piping and electrical connections and 8 pipe bollards to protect the new pump control panels mounted on the exterior of the containment structure. This work was requested by the District Operations Department to provide the ability to automatically flow pace the H202 chemical from the feed pumps into the trunk lines and monitor the chemical flows in the feed piping. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 10a) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $111,315.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 85 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL PROGRAMMING FOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE (H2O,) FACILITIES The Contractor was directed to provide additional labor to program the programmable logic controllers (PLC's)for the Primary Scrubber, Influent Sewer and Trunkline Odor, and Headworks Scrubber Hydrogen Peroxide (1-12O2) Facilities at Plant No. 1. The programming was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff and included an additional 132 hours of programming time for the addition of metering pump cascade control, auto/manual data screens, flow alarms and other miscellaneous programming changes to the original scope of work. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 20) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13.759.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $126,074.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 105 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: November 2. 2000 Job: Chemical Facility Mod;hcations. Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 105 calendar day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 22, 1999 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 22, 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 105 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 229 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 594 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 6, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 2 229 251.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 173 908.00 This Change (Add) (9edUG1) $ 125,074.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,528,233.0 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: November 2, 2000 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. Pl-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent. Job No.J-53 Board Authorization Date: ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SS MECHANICAL CORPORATION Contractor Date T PDC COMMITTEE "ee"rp°ae TMBa ofal. u 1112/00 css/OB AGENDA REPORT mm NUMW Itrm Number po000-M 13fM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mark Tomko, Project Manager SUBJECT: SEWER PIPELINE INSPECTION/EVALUATION FOR BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4; SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 1-17; SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to provide inspection, engineering services, and prepare a report on the structural integrity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-2-4; Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-17; and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $900,000. SUMMARY The Bushard Trunk Sewer, Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer were video inspected in the summer of 1999. The inspections revealed defects in the sewers such as liner failure and pipeline corrosion. The structural integrity of the sewers cannot be sufficiently evaluated with video inspection alone. The purpose of this project is to physically inspect and evaluate the structural integrity of the three sewers. The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes an inspection plan, television, man-entry, and soil void inspection, sewer bypassing, cleaning, traffic control, and a final report on the structural integrity of the three sewers. Previous projects have shown that a physical inspection is required to accurately determine the structural integrity of a sewer pipe. Two consultants submitted proposals on September 13, 2000: DGA Consultants, Inc., and Tran Consulting Engineers (TCE). Staff evaluated both proposals and determined that TCE had a better project approach and understanding of the Scope of Work Staff recommends approval of a PSA with TCE, for a total amount not to exceed $900,000. \4adonWata1\erp.Ma%agenda\Board Agenda Repods@000 Board Agenda Repods\1100g1ena 13(d)do a-. . Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total combined project Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is $900,000, which is comprised of$268,859 for the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-241; $300,206 for the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-17; and $330,935 for the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-21. The Consultant PSA authorization request for Contract No. I-2-4 is $268,859 and Contract No. 7-21 is $330,935. Contract No. 1-17 requires transferring $20,000 from Project Development and $40,000 from Studies/Permitting to increase the Consultant PSA authorization to $300,206. The authorization request for Contract No. 1-17 is $240,206. See the attached Budget Information Tables for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: Bushand Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, 1-24; Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, 1-17; Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, 7-21) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total project budget for Contact No. I-2-4 will not change. Staff proposes transferring $35,024 from Studies/Permitting and $269,855 from Contingency for a Project Development proposed budget increase of$35,879 and Consultant PSA proposed budget increase of$269,000. The increase to the Project Development budget will cover a deficit in that budget portion due to the need to conduct more planning and development than originally anticipated. The increase to the Consultant PSA budget will cover the PSA with Tran Consulting Engineers (TCE). The total project budget for Contract No. 1-17 will not change. Staff proposes transferring $20,000 from Project Development and $40,000 from Studies/Permitting for a Consultant PSA proposed budget increase of$60,000. The increase to the Consultant PSA budget will cover the PSA with TCE. The total project budget for Contract No. 7-21 will not change. Staff proposes transferring $131,000 from Contingency for a Consultant PSA proposed budget increase of$131,000. The increase to the Consultant PSA budget will cover the PSA with TCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Bushard Trunk Sewer, Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer were video inspected in the summer of 1999 through a contract with DGA Consultants, Inc. The inspection revealed defects in the sewer including, HAwpAtatagendaSoard Agenda Repona2000 Board Agenda ReportaM 100Utem 13(d)dw Re sagas Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ES' p6OJECTRASK : 'AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHO�NI"LATION TOTAL E7��� � I r BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE R4G jiFf'r AUTHOFU>!ii4TI ON, X �k Project Development $ 7,800 $ 37.000 $ 35.879 $ 72,879 $ 72,871 $ 72.871 $ 72,871 100% Studies/Permitting $ 15,002 $ 40,000 $ (35,024) $ 4,976 $ 4,976 $ 4,976 $ 4.976 100% Consultant PSA $ 260,900 $ 955,000 $ 269.000 $ 1,224.000 $ 892,779 $ 268,858 $ 1.161,637 $ 129,000 11% Design Staff $ 790.824 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 $ 15,038 5% Construction Contract $ 21,217.321 $ 21,500,000 $ 21,500,000 $ Constuction Administration $ 1,049,624 $ 1.560,000 $ 1.560,000 $ Constmction Inspection $ 1,913,106 $ 1,950,000 $ 11950,000 $ Contingency $ 7,548,924 $ 4,300,000 $ (269,855 $ 4,030,145 $ Reimbursable Costs $ - $ TOTAL $ 32.803,501 $ 30,630,000 $ - $ 30.630.000 $ 1,258,626 $ 288,858 $ 1.627,484 $ 221,885 15% b:hvp.tllalsspllo.s%bWpt WWI.Form Re ss0 Aug.31.2000 E • BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO 1-17 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED E91, PR0JECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EAR BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE Project Development $ 39.800 $ 45,000 $ (20,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 20,000) $ 25,000 $ 14.763 59% Studies/Permatin $ 70,000 $ (40,000) $ 30,000 $ 70,000 $ (40.000) $ 30,000 $ 1,219 4% Consultant PSA $ 281,000 It 300,000 $ 60.000 $ 360,000 $ 59,306 $ 300,206 $ 359.512 $ 59,306 18% Design Staff $ 509,500 $ 218.000 $ 218.000 $ 218,000 $ 218,000 Constmction Contract $ 4,700,700 $ 5.000.000 $ 5,000,000 $ $ - $ - Construction Administration $ 717,700 $ 406.000 $ 406,000 $ $ - $ Construction Inspection $ 474,000 $ 474,000 $ $ - $ Contingency $ 1.245.200 $ 981,000 $ 981,000 $ - $ - $ Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 7.493,900 $ 7,494,000 $ - $ 7,494.000 $ 392.306 $ 240,206 $ 632.512 $ 75.288 12% MWAtsk"UOBS CONTR CTSU-1T1.17.combo project,092600 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 7-21 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED E81IMAT*Pr PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EX{1ENblll1*@ BUDGET- BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE RE09EST AUTHORIZATION TO.dA* Project Development $ 17,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 27.309 68% Studies/Permitting $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 1,226 9% Consultant PSA $ 216,000 $ 284,000 $ 131,000 $ 415,000 $ 84,000 $ 330,935 $ 414,935 $ 83,603 20% Design Staff $ 264,400 $ 165.000 $ 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 165,000 Construction Contract $ 3,511,000 $ 3,550,000 $ 3,550,000 $ $ Constmction Administration $ 482.300 $ 307.000 $ 307,000 $ $ Construction Inspection $ 327.000 $ 327,000 $ $ Contingency $ 897,900 $ 700,000 $ (131,OOD) $ 569,000 $ $ Reimburaable Costs TOTAL $ 5,387,800 $ 5,387,000 $ - $ 5,387.000 $ 303,000 $ 330.935 $ 633,935 $ 112.138 18% hA".MsW,410BS C0NTRACTS%7-2117-21.combo prq budgal tebb.092800 4 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Sewer Pipeline Inspection/Evaluation Contract No. 1-2-4, 1-17, and 7-21 Total Project Budget: Contract No. 1-2-4, $30,630,000; Contract No. 1-17, $7,494,000; and Contract No. 7-21, $5.387,000 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Start Date of Project: December 4, 2000 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs Pending Original PSA Provide inspection and engineering $900.000 $900,000 services to evaluate the structural integrity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer, Santa Ana Trunk Sewer, and Sunflower Interceptor Sewer. %Vstl nldatallwp.dtalengUOBS 6 CONTRACTSU-24.1.17.7-21.Combo PmiedPsa-Agenda RPM-24.PSA Statue Report TCE.092700.doe MT y STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES SEWER PIPELINE AND INSPECTION/EVALUATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4, 1-17, 7-21 The following firms received a Request for Proposals sent out on July 28, 2000: • ADS Environmental Services • Carollo Engineers • DGA Consultants, Inc. • Miller Pipeline Corporation • National Plant Services, Inc. • R&R Visual Inspection Services • Sancon Engineering, Inc. • Tran Consulting Engineers Proposals were received from two Consultants on September 13, 2000. Seven of the eight consulting firms joined into two teams and no proposal or response was received from Miller Pipeline Corporation. Proposals were then distributed for review and ranking by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of five members. Interviews were conducted on September 20, 2000. The Consultants were evaluated based upon the proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work. Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work. Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience. Rates the team's overall total number of year's experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design of sewers. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design of sewers. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the design of sewers. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to Consultant Team. r 6. Proposed Schedule. Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can ly the Consultant Team meet the schedule? Each Consultant's "List of Assumptions and Exceptions to the Scope of Work" were evaluated as to whether the assumptions and exceptions were acceptable. The Consultants were then ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the two teams (See Table 1.0): 1. Tran Consulting Engineers 1440 Points 2. DGA Consultants, Inc. 1405 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked Consultant. Tran Consulting Engineers (TCE) TCE had the highest-ranked proposal based on project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, and applicable staff and team qualifications. TCE exhibited a clear and focused understanding of the objective of the project and proposed a well defined method to achieve those objectives. TCE also proposed an alternative method for achieving the objectives of the project that varied from the Scope of Work. The evaluation team determined that TCE had the best combination of experience, knowledge, and team members to effectively complete the objectives of the project. Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the Director of Engineering opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the Consultants. The top ranked Consultant, TCE, submitted the highest fee proposal ($2,728,020) for the requested Scope of Work. After evaluating TCE's proposal and the suggested alternative ($1,034,999), the District determined that the objectives of the project could be satisfied with a reduced Scope of Work. The District negotiated with TCE to modify the Scope of Work and settled on a total fee not to exceed $900,000. Staff recommends TCE be awarded the PSA for the Sewer Pipeline Inspection/Evaluation, Contract Nos. 1-2-4, 1-17, and 7-21, for a total fee not to exceed $900,000. fill wadonbatalpvp.dtal ngVOBs 8 CONTRACTSII-24.1-17.7-21.Combo ProiWki'sa-Agenda RpN-24.slaff evaluation of proposels.092700.doc TABLE 1.0 SEWER PIPELINE INSPECTION/EVALUATION Contract No. 1-2-4, 1-17, 7-21 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES Firm Tran Consulting DGA Consultants, Inc. Engineers Reviewer A 275 239 Reviewer B 286 262 Reviewer C 291 303 Reviewer D 327 350 Reviewer E 261 251 Total Score 1440 1405 (1750 Points Maximum) Average Score 288 281 (350 Points Maximum) Project Close Out Proposed 52 69 (Weeks) Proposed Not To Exceed Fee $2,728,020 $1,988,292 Alternate Proposed Not To Exceed Fee $1,034,999 No alternate proposed Negotiated Not To Exceed Fee $900,000 NIA PDC COMMITTEE raKnng arts 7o m.ma. 11(7(g0 ll/1510, AGENDA REPORT 15PDODD- b teJX.) PD000-n 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: PLANT NO. 1 HEADWORKS NO. 1 DEMOLITION, JOB NO. P1-83 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1-83, in the amount of$1,480,000; and (2)Authorize Staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for design services for Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 1 Demolition, Job No. P1-83. SUMMARY This project will accelerate the scheduled demolition of the old Headworks at Plant No. 1 to avoid costly electrical safety improvements identified in the Area Classification Project, Job No. J-35. The old Headworks at Plant No. 1 was originally built in 1959. No major improvements have been made to the old Headworks since the new Plant No. 1 Headworks was completed in 1990. In 1999, the Area Classification Project identified that Headworks No. 1 does not meet the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 820 Standard entitled "Standards for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities." In September, during the implementation phase of the Area Classification Project, it was determined that it is cost prohibitive to upgrade this facility to meet the NFPA 820 standards. Today, the old Plant No. 1 Headworks is operated as a standby pumping facility. The facility's Grit Chambers and other appurtenances were decommissioned with the completion of the new Plant No. 1 Headworks in 1988. The Strategic Plan identifies that, in the next five to seven years, additional Grit Chambers will be constructed in the area currently occupied by the old Plant No. 1 Headworks. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization for $16,000 is being requested. This request includes the following items for Job No. P1-83: $15,000 under project development for Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff to develop the project's Scope of Work; and $1,000 under studies/permitting for attaining project permits. Please refer to the q,„,,,,a Page 1 column titled'This Authorization Request" in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The attached Budget Information Table indicates that the establishment of a budget in the amount of$1,488,000 is required. This request includes the following items for Job No. P1-83: $15,000 for Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff to develop the project's Scope of Work; $1,000 for attaining project permits; $100,000 for a design consultant to prepare engineering drawings and specifications; $50,000 for District staff to administer the design contract and the construction bidding; $900,000 for a Contractor to construct the project; $50,000 for District staff to administer the construction contract; $100,000 for the District to inspect the contractor's work; $270,000 for project contingencies; and $2,000 for District staff reimbursable costs. Please refer to the column titled "Proposed Budget Increase" in the attached Budget Information Table. The proposed source of funds is the District's Capital Improvement Program Reserves. This is a new project and it was not included in the 2000/01 CORF Budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Based on projected flows, the first phase of the new Grit Chambers at Plant No. 1 will need to be constructed in the next five to seven years. The new Grit Chambers will be constructed in the area currently occupied by the old Plant No. 1 Headworks. Thus, the old Plant No. 1 Headworks must be demolished to make room for the new grit chambers. The on-going Area Classification Project is evaluating the existing treatment plant's compliance with existing regulatory codes. Area Classifications are based on the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) published NFPA Standard 820 entitled "Standards for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities." The Area Classification Project is also developing cost estimates to bring the District's facilities up to the current standard. The old Plant No. 1 Headworks is not in compliance with NFPA 820. The new Plant No. 1 Headworks was designed and built to replace the old Plant No. 1 Headworks. The old Plant No. 1 Headworks is in standby mode, but only the influent pumps are operable. The remaining facilities were decommissioned with the start-up of the new Headworks in 1988. R� � Page 2 'r ALTERNATIVES No Action. However, this site would remain NFPA 820 non-compliant until it is demolished with the construction of the new grit chambers. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a portion of the previously approved 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The final 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was approved on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table JB:jak:jo H[\wp.dla%genda\Board Agenda ReportsQ"Board Agenda Reports\ OMnem 13(e).dw Re.oaa. arxisa Page 3 S f BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT NO. 1 HEADWORKS NO. 1 DEMOLITION JOB NO. P1-83 -ORIGINALS CURRENT , PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED EVIWAF PROJECTITASK .AUTHORIZED PROJECT .BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AU*DRIiATION- TOTAL EI(PP,N'�TYI v _( i` BUDGET BUDGET- INCREASE BUDGET`' T0DATE" a°REQUEST "AUTHORIZATION TOL E ' �+ • Project Development $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ 15.000 $ 15,000 $ 0% Studies/Permitting $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 0% Consultant PSA $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Deal n Staff $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Construction Contract $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Construction Administration $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Construction Ins action $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Contingency $ - $ - $ 270,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Reimbursable Costs $ - $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ - $ - $ 1.488.000 $ 1.488,000 $ - $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 0% H:%P.etalen9U0BS a WNTR CTWIt 83 Headmft No-1 De=gP1-83 aIT.%IslDistnds r PDC COMMITTEE McOng Date To ee.mar. 11/2/00 IVIS/0g AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDODO-79 131A Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. 132-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, providing for additional services, for an additional amount of$224,153, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $649,073. SUMMARY The Headworks at Plant No. 2 has been expanded or modified by more than 40 different projects over the past 30 plus years. There are a number of Headworks components requiring major rehabilitation, replacement, automation, and safety/seismic upgrades. The original Headworks Improvements project included development of a rehabilitation plan for the existing facilities. At the February 2000 PDC Committee meeting, it was decided to forgo a rehabilitation effort and focus solely on replacing the Headworks. This decision was made based on technical merits rather than on a detailed economic evaluation of Headworks altematives. The District subsequently awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Carollo Engineers for preliminary engineering of a replacement Headworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66. At the beginning of the project, a preliminary new Headworks cost estimate of $48 million was developed and incorporated into the CORF 2000-2001 Budget based on the cost of the existing Plant No. 1 Headworks, Job No. P1-20. As the project proceeded, District Engineering and Operations staff reached a consensus as to the types of treatment processes that should be included in the new Headworks through a series of workshops with Carollo Engineers. The recommended Headworks replacement project is documented in a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) prepared by Carollo Engineers. Carollo Engineers informed District staff as they were completing the PER that the estimated construction cost of the new Headworks may be excess of $100 million based on decisions made regarding process equipment and maowmiwyamma�•�a iaea:aewrev000 m.,e na. a.aswreniomne. a@.aoo R. Page 1 capacity requirements. Some of the reasons for the cost increase over the Plant No. 1 Headworks project that could not have been anticipated prior to the project workshops were the following: • Recommendations that some of the facilities be designed for ultimate flow instead of year 2020 flows. • Addition of additional equipment and structures not currently included at Plant No. 1 Headworks. • Addition of equipment that was not part of the original Scope of Work for the project. A one-day Value Engineering workshop was subsequently held with Carollo Engineers and District staff to identify approaches to reducing the construction cost. Four alternatives were developed to reduce costs. In addition to the four cost saving alternatives, another approach to reducing construction costs is to optimize the design criteria for the screenings removal process. As such, pilot plant studies were recommended during the project workshops to confirm the amount and characteristics of the screenings that would be generated with small bar screen spacings and determine the need for specific screenings washing equipment to meet regulatory requirements and reduce odor problems. Since Carollo has been intimately involved in the preparation of the PER and has a thorough understanding of the District's vision for this project, Staff recommends that Carollo Engineers be selected to prepare an Engineering Analysis of the Headworks cost saving alternatives, develop the pilot plant testing plan, and provide assistance during the operation of Pilot Plant Studies at Plant No. 1. Staffs recommended approach to moving forward with the design and construction of the new Headworks is the following: 1) Prepare an engineering analysis that confirms the best Headworks project from both a technical and economic perspective (proposed Addendum No. 3). 2) Use the results of the pilot plant studies to refine the design criteria and confirm the required Headworks equipment (proposed Addendum No. 3 for Carollo Engineers and a subsequent series of contracts to install and operate the pilot test equipment). 3) Initiate either the final design of the current Headworks project or the preliminary and final design of an alternative Headworks project (subsequent PSA). H�w da. gemakaoam Agenda Re��Rmb Agenda Rap %11�em 13laaae R--d. dam° Page 2 9 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The original contract amount for Carollo Engineers Professional Services Agreement for the Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 was $375,000. Addendum No. 1 for$24,940 and Addendum No. 2 for$24,980 were previously approved under the General Manager's authority. The funds for Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 were taken out of the project contingency. Approval of Addendum No. 3 is being requested in the amount of$224,153 as shown in the attached PSA Status Report. It is requested that $224,153 be authorized from the Contingency budget shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The total revised Consultant PSA amount for Carollo Engineers after Addendum No. 3 is $649,073. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Una Rem: section e.Page 71) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The original Consultant PSA for$375,000 was approved in February 2000. Addendum No. 1 for$24,940 was approved by the General Manager on September 26, 2000. A total contingency amount of$111,800 was authorized to cover this addendum, as well as staff project development and studies labor. The remaining contingency after Addendum No. 1 was $17,329,200. There was no change in the overall project budget of$74,118,000, Addendum No. 2 for $24,980 was approved by the General Manager on September 26, 2000. A total contingency amount of$24,980 was authorized to cover this addendum. The remaining contingency after Addendum No. 2 was $17,304,220. There was no change in the overall project budget of$74,118,000. It is requested that $224,153 be moved from Contingency to the Consultant PSA budget to cover Addendum No. 3. The remaining contingency after Addendum No. 3 would be $17,080,067. No change in the overall project budget of $74,118,000 is being requested. H lA9CY1vvv^Ev�e,!AperAv Nepartil]A102wE ApmMu PeyA111eNMn le(a.,x Ra . BM98 Page 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Headworks Analysis The Preliminary Engineering Report for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 project, Job No. P2-66, consists of a series of technical memoranda that describe the proposed new Headworks. The conclusions and recommendations included in these memoranda were based on a consensus reached between District Engineering and Operations staff and Carollo Engineers in a series of four workshops. The preliminary cost for the new Headworks at the beginning of the project was estimated to be $48 million. Based on the decisions made in the workshops, however, the construction cost for the new Headworks is now estimated to be in excess of$100 million. In an effort to reduce costs, District staff and Carollo Engineers conducted a one-day Value Engineering workshop to discuss potential cost saving measures for the new Headworks project described in the Preliminary Engineering Report. Since no engineering or cost analyses have been done for rehabilitation of the existing Plant No. 2 Headworks alternatives, the Project Team identified potential rehabilitation Headworks projects that may reduce costs. The current project described in the Preliminary Engineering Report includes a new Headworks project for an operational capacity of 340 mgd (year 2020 peak flow) with provisions for 517 mgd of ultimate peak flow capacity (major piping, hydraulics, structures, etc.). The following four (4) alternatives were developed in the Value Engineering workshop: 1) Build current new Headworks project for an operational capacity of 340 mgd with provisions for an ultimate peak flow capacity of 517 mgd and include cost saving measures 2) Build new Headworks for an operational capacity of 340 mgd 3) Build new Headworks for an operational capacity of 340 mgd including cost saving measures 4) Build new metering and diversion structure, bar screens, and pumping to replace Headworks B including cost saving measures and rehabilitate Headworks C pumping and grit basins for an operational capacity of 340 mgd. The District requested Carollo Engineers to prepare a detailed Scope of Work for the analysis of these alternatives. This Scope of Work is presented in Attachment 3 and includes the development of design criteria, layouts, and construction costs for each alternative and preparation of a report summarizing the findings. In addition, the costs of similar size Headworks constructed by other agencies will be summarized for comparison purposes. The proposed engineering analysis will answer the following questions: H\rq.UmWpenEeNmN AgwWv Reprm\]O "O A p,q Rfl ft%110VJIxn IM,� R. Page 4 1) Will the proposed cost saving measures substantially reduce the cost of the currently proposed new Headworks? 2) Is there an alternative that includes partial rehabilitation of the existing Headworks and several new Headworks components which would be comparable in cost to a totally new Headworks based on similar useful lives for both alternatives? 3) Does a 340 mgd Headworks make economic sense? As an adjunct to this effort, the District may wish to consider a separate planning study that takes a closer look at projected flows beyond 2020. This effort would give some indication as to future cash flow expenditures. Pilot Plant Studies The current Headworks project includes bar screens with smaller spacings than the existing bar screens. The smaller spacing was selected to remove more debris from the influent, thereby reducing maintenance requested for downstream equipment and reducing digester cleaning. The potential down side of this decision is the potential removal of more organic material along with the screenings. The increased organic material may necessitate the use of a screenings washer that is not currently being used at Plant No. 2. The goals of the pilot plant studies are to: • Determine the amount and type of screenings that would be removed by bar screens with smaller openings. • Determine the need for a screenings washer to minimize odors, facilitate screenings compaction and ultimately reduce hauling costs. • Test two types of screening washers and compactors to determine the most cost-effective system for Plant No. 2. Since the current plan is to demolish the existing Headworks at Plant No. 2, it is proposed to conduct the pilot studies at Plant No. 1. The existing 1-inch bar screens would be replaced with smaller bar screens for the test. If the test were successful, then the new bar screens would become part of the permanent facility at Plant No. 1. The pilot plant studies are divided into two phases to expedite their completion and the subsequent design of the new Plant No. 2 Headworks. Phase 1 includes negotiations with equipment vendors and preparation of plans and specifications. Corolla Engineers under Addendum No. 2 to their existing contract will perform this effort along with support from District staff. Phase 2 includes development of a pilot plant testing plan, installation of pilot plant equipment, and performance of the pilot plant studies. Staff is requesting approval for Carollo Engineers to develop the testing plan and provide assistance during the pilot plant studies. In order to facilitate District management of work performed by Carollo prior to final H Wp.EmSptla�uN ApeMp Re{oM1\'AtlBmN ApanECRepoN\110UApm 13m.bc ReAW: a Page 5 r 9 design of new Headworks, it is recommended that the pilot plant assistance by Carollo Engineers be included in Addendum No. 3 along with the evaluation of Headworks alternatives. Once the project elements are better defined and the plans and specifications have been prepared, District staff will develop and submit a plan for construction and operation of the pilot plant by District staff to the Board for approval at a later date. This plan will include District staff labor for the pilot plant studies. The key potential benefit of this effort is a reduction in Headworks construction cost. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the addendum. The District could proceed with the current Headworks project without the benefit of analyzing alternatives or testing equipment that could potentially be more cost-effective. The District would not have site-specific data from the pilot studies to optimize the design criteria and determine if screenings washing equipment is required. CEQA FINDINGS Replacement of the Plant No. 2 Headworks was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. A supplemental EIR will be needed for the new Headworks. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal letter from Carollo Engineers dated October 12, 2000 JDH:PK:jo HAwp.dtalagendalBoaM Agenda Repods2000 Board Agenda Repa1s11100Nem 13(fiAm H Mpftppe "V MAgmn Repnb\TI]O Ap ft Re %110 13M,g Rvnse ' area Page 6 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 JOB NO. 132-66 fi ORIQINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESJIIAA D s afi1 P� � CI7IOR1 Ells I PR CT BU REN'ISED� AUTHO D A N 'OP({ TOF! EXI�fiN� ) t$DDBET BUOtOET : I+ D sE BUD�Er T80 TE RE 8T .: AUTHO TIbH T�itArE` x Project Development $ 57,999 $ 59,736 $ 59.736 $ 69,736 $ 59,736 $ 59.736 100% Studies/Permitting $ 92,400 $ 91,124 $ 91,124 $ 91,1241 $ 91.124 1 $ 91,124 100% Consultant PSA $ 360.301 $ 3.264.920 $ 224.153 $ 3,489,073 $ 424.920 $ 224,163 $ 649,073 $ 286,144 44% Design Stag $ 90,100 $ 319,000 $ 319,000 $ 319.000 $ 319,000 $ 31,423 10% L Contract $ 1.799.600 $ 48,000.000 $ 48,000,000 $ 10,687 n on $ 3.238.000 $ 3,238,000 $ 295 n $ 1,841,000 $ 1,841,000 $ 670 $ 17,304,220 $ 224,153) $ 17,080,067 Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 2,400,400 $ 74.118.000 $ - $ 74,118,000 $ 894,780 $ 224.153 $ 1,118,933 $ 480.079 43% n:twp.d�ekagwmscamaasbz-sabz 55 revised wdget inrom aon tame 9-2e-00 adden 3 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 Job No. 132-66 Total Project Budget: $74,118,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: 8/1/99 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/1/00 Original preliminary Engineering Report for the design of a $375,000 $375,000 PSA new headworks at Plant No. 2 Additional engineering tasks- sewer hydraulic 9/26/00 1 analyses and phone survey of vortex grit basin $24,940 $399,940 installations Additional engineering tasks —assistance in 9/26/00 2 negotiations with equipment vendors and $24,980 $424,920 preparation of plans and specifications for pilot test equipment Additional engineering tasks - evaluation of 3 headworks alternatives and assistance during pilot $224,153 $649,073 plant studies H9Wp.dta%engU0BS&CONTRACTST2.66TSAWSA Swtue Report adders 3.dot 10/11/00 ReAaed 06114M8 �EceroLLo e n 6 r n e e r s October 12, 2000 6047A00 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Attention: Mr. David Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Subject: Proposal for Additional Engineering Services, Contract Amendment No. 3 Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement, Job No. P2-66 Dear Mr. Ludwin: Attached is a proposed scope of work and budget estimate for PSA Amendment No. 3. This amendment provides engineering services to analyze cost reduction alternatives for Job No. 132-66, Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement project and assist the District with retrofit and demonstration testing of headworks equipment. Services are generally divided into two parts as follows: PART A—PROJECT COST REDUCTION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS • Task At — Evaluation of Alternatives for Potential Cost Reduction. • Task A2—Meetings with Staff. • Task A3—Architectural Concept. • Task A4—Assistance with Presentation Material to the Board. PART B—ASSISTANCE WITH RETROFIT AND DEMONSTRATION TESTING • Task B1 —Preparation of Test Plans • Task B2—Coordination with Equipment Suppliers • Task B3—Contract Documents • Task B4—Assistance During Installation and Testing • Task B5—Evaluation of Test Data • Task B6—Staff Workshop • Task B7—Preparation of Final Test Reports • Task B8— Project Management With notice to proceed expected around mid-November,we expect to complete Part A around January 20, 2001. For Part B, several factors impact the schedule including the manufacturing and installation of new equipment for demonstration testing. It is anticipated that Part B tasks will be completed within 12 months from notice to proceed. Carollo will submit the draft test plans and suppliers' scope of supply within 45 days after notice to proceed. Final test plans will be submitted two weeks after receipt of District's comments on 1¢1CM _SAOWCasuNuNft3m ea 3100 SOUTH HAR80R 80ULEVANO, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92704 • (7141 $40-4300 • FAX(7141 640-4349 Mr. David Ludwin, P.E. Orange County Sanitation District October 12, 2000 a Page 2 the draft test plans. The final test reports will be submitted 21 days after the Summary Workshop. With your concurrence, we will begin immediately on notice to proceed to avoid delays to this important project. In the interim, if you have any questions or'If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, P.C. ary C. E. rh a n-Charge Walid Karam, P.E. Project Manager WK:kpr Enclosures M:�CLIENTOCSD_SAOW 1CgNT1UCTIT(N.UD W IN001.DOC V ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK PLANT NO. 2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT JOB NO, P2-66 PROJECT COST REDUCTION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS, RETROFIT AND DEMONSTRATION TESTING PSA AMENDMENT NO. 3 Attachment A provides for engineering services to analyze cost reduction alternatives for Job No. P2-66, Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement project and assist the District with retrofit and demonstration testing of headworks equipment. These services are generally divided into two parts as follows: PART A — PROJECT COST REDUCTION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 1. SUMMARY Part A provides for engineering services to analyze cost reduction alternatives for Job No. P2- 66, Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement project. The engineering services shall generally include: • Provide a feasibility level review and cost estimate for three alternatives for the Headworks Replacement Project. • For each alternative, identify potential deviations from District standards. • Meet with District staff to review the alternatives and provide information on potential cost reductions. District staff will select a preferred alternative for recommendation to the District's Board of Directors. • Prepare a letter report summarizing the alternatives and the resulting conclusions. 2. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The District has identified the need for a new Headworks Facility to replace the existing B and C Headworks at Plant No. 2. Professional engineering services to accomplish full implementation of a new Headworks Facility are provided in five phases. These phases are: Phase 1 —Preliminary Engineering Report Phase 2— Final Design Phase 3— Bidding Services Phase 4—Services During Construction Phase 5—Training, Start-up and Preparation of Operations Manuals Phase 1 — Preliminary Engineering Report has been completed and submitted to the District. Before proceeding with Phase 2—Final Design, the District would like to consider several HlcnenA, m snMvn t.a 2-e ddm.AM.dx 1 alternatives to the selected project.The District can then move forward with a project that otters the best value. This scope of work provides for completion of a Project Cost Reduction Alternative Analysis. 3. PROJECT ELEMENTS The specific tasks for preparation of a Project Cost Reduction Alternative Analysis are defined as follows: Task All — Evaluate the Following Alternatives for Potential Cost Reductions Alternative Is—Proceed with the project as currently planned. Design and construct a new headworks facility for an operational capacity of 340 mgd,with provisions for 517 mgd capacity (major piping, hydraulics, etc.). Alternative ib— Proceed with the project as currently planned. Design and construct a new headworks facility for an operational capacity of 340 mgd, with provisions for 517 mgd capacity(major piping, hydraulics, etc.). Evaluate the following measures to reduce costs: Metering and Diversion 1 b.1 Consider eliminating the metering and diversion structure. 1 b.2 Consider eliminating provisions for future 96-inch pipe. Screening 1 b.3 Consider installation of bar screens with 1-inch bar spacing instead 5/8-inch bar spacing. 1 b.4 Consider eliminating the proposed bridge crane in the Bar Screen Building. 1b.5 Consider reducing the proposed eight-foot spacing between bar screens to six feet. 1 b.6 Plan for using concrete masonry construction for electrical building and pump room. 1b.7 Identify feasibility of providing screening after pumping, including approximate elevations of structures. Identity advantages or disadvantages. Costs will not be developed for this option. Screenings Handling 1b.8 Consider eliminating screenings washing. 1 b.9 Provide screenings storage for only one truck, reducing storage time to less than four days. Pumping 1 b.10 Consider reducing the number of pumps. 1 b.11 Consider eliminating check valves. 1 b.12 Immersible motors in dry pitteliminate motor room.Cost will not be developed, but it will be mentioned as an option only. "=Wnfl W_SAOYAcoMWP2�d=-AMAW 2 1b.13 Consider monorails Instead of bridge crane. 1b.14 Provide some constant speed pumps with no VFDs. Grit Basins 1 b.15 Consider reducing design criteria for lower detention times. 1 b.16 Consider eliminating one grit pumping hopper from each basin. 1b.17 Consider vortex grit basins. 1b.18 Reduce design criteria for vortex basins to reduce number of tanks (60 mgd per basin instead of 50 mgd). Provide cost for six basins instead of eight. Grit Handling 1 b.19 Provide grit storage for only one truck, reducing storage time to less than four days. Use same information developed for option tb.9 for order of magnitude savings. Primary Influent Splitting 1 b.20 Eliminate primary influent meters. Chemical savings will not be considered. Chemical Facilities 1 b.21 Delete canopies over storage. Electrical 1 b.22 Reduce size of electrical building. Alternative 2—Proceed with a project sized for 340-mgd.This size would meet the projected flows to Plant No. 2 through 2020.When the capacity of Plant No. 2 is expanded beyond the current peak flow rate of 340 mgd, an additional new headworks facility would be required. Planning and design for this facility would need to start in about 2014, based on the 1999 Strategic Plan. Alternative 2a— Proceed with project as currently planned, only rated for a 340 mgd capacity. Alternative 26—Consider cost cutting measures from Ahemative 1 b for a 340 mgd facility. Alternative 3-Consider rehabilitation of a portion of the existing headworks facilities. Construct new metering and diversion, bar screens and pumping to replace Headworks B. Apply cost cutting measures from Alternative 1b for the new facilities. Rehabilitate Headworks C pumping and grit basins. Eliminate primary influent meters. The rehabilitation would address modifications and upgrades to meet current codes and safety issues and incorporate improvements from the on-going J-42 project where feasible. J-42 issues will be screened in a workshop with staff.Only those J-42 issues which impact the big picture cost and feasibility will be considered in the evaluation.The rehabilitation would consider MMWb snovnco tre 2a MMAM.a 3 service life and replacement cost for existing facilities to achieve an additional service life of 40 years. Best available technology would be considered for new facilities only. Summary Report Carollo will prepare a brief summary report to document and summarize the alternatives and resulting conclusions. The summary will include the following for each cost reduction alternative: • Item in Current Project: Description and Purpose. • Description of Alternative. • Advantages. • Disadvantages. Each alternative will be presented on its own merit and cost impacts between various alternatives will not be developed. Cost Estimate Using Pt-20 Project Data A preliminary cost estimate will be developed for the proposed Plant No.2 headworks facilities described in Alternative 1a, Current Project, using historical data from the P1-20 project.The actual bid cost will be adjusted for Increases in the Engineering News Record(ENR)Cost Index and for differences in facility capacity. The adjustments will be based on standard preliminary estimating techniques. In addition, a budget estimate will be developed for features which were not included in the P7-20 project. Task A2— Meet with District Staff • A four-hour workshop will be held with District staff to screen J-42 issues. Those J-42 issues which impact the big picture,feasibility level cost estimate will be identified and used in the evaluation of Alternative 3. • A workshop will be conducted prior to estimating rehabilitation costs. Carollo will present a recommended approach for rehabilitation of the existing headworks.The purpose of this workshop is to obtain input from District staff and receive concurrence on the approach and basis of evaluation for each area of the existing headworks. • A workshop will be presented after the alternative analysis in Task 1 is complete, to present the results of the alternative evaluation. The purpose of the workshop is to obtain input from District staff and screen alternatives for ability to implement. At this workshop, Staff will select a preferred alternative, and identify other alternatives which are acceptable for implementation. Task A3— Architectural Concept Develop a preliminary architectural concept for the selected headworks alternative and provide the District with preliminary elevation drawings and one perspective drawing. aacnann ., snoMc .m 2rawm AM.a 4 V Task A4 — Assist Staff with Preparation of Materials for Presentation to the Board After staff has selected the preferred alternative, Carollo will assist with preparation of materials for presentation to the District committees and the Board of Directors. 4. SCHEDULE Carollo will begin work immediately on Notice to Proceed and will present the results of Task 1 in a workshop, no later than two months after notice to proceed. PART B - ASSISTANCE WITH RETROFIT AND DEMONSTRATION TESTING 1. SUMMARY Part B provides for engineering services to assist the District with bar screen retrofit and demonstration testing of headworks equipment which will provide a higher level of treatment and is new to District O&M staff.The results of the demonstration testing will be used to confirm and optimize the design criteria for Job No. P2.66, Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement project. Preliminary engineering to allow this work to proceed was completed under PSA Amendment No. 2. The engineering services under Part B shall generally include: • Prepare a test plan for each demonstration test. • Provide coordination and direction during installation and testing of the equipment. • Evaluate test data. • Meet with District staff to review findings. • Prepare final test reports. 2. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The District has identified the need for a new Headworks Facility to replace the existing B and C Headworks at Plant No. 2. Professional engineering services to accomplish full implementation of a new Headworks Facility are provided in five phases.These phases are: Phase 1 —Preliminary Engineering Report Phase 2—Final Design Phase 3—Bidding Services Phase 4—Services During Construction Phase 5—Training, Start-up and Preparation of Operations Manuals Phase 1 — Preliminary Engineering Report has been completed and submitted to the District. The report recommends demonstration testing to give District staff experience with the recommended equipment. This includes bar screens with smaller bar spacing to improve the level of treatment and reduce overall O&M cost. In a letter dated August 10,2000, Carollo provided detailed recommendations for testing bar screens with smaller bar spacing, and the District will be proceeding with this test work. Since Hl,alo.t& LSAOWConlmd P24SMdc3-WR 5 smaller bar spacing will remove more material with different characteristics than the existing U screens, the District would also like to perform demonstration testing for screenings handling equipment.The purpose of the demonstration testing is to confirm and optimize design criteria and confirm technology selection and equipment sizing for the Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project. The District needs to decide ff screenings will be washed, compacted or washed and compacted. Carollo has recommended additional demonstration testing as follows: • Screenings Washing—Carollo recommends screenings washing,to reduce odors and improve the operations environment in the screenings handling and storage facility. The Hycor Heliclean is a proprietary piece of equipment which offers high energy washing and compaction of screenings material to about 30 percent solids.This unit can be installed at Plant No. 1 after the bar screen retrofit,to allow staff to assess the quality of the screenings (cleanliness and dryness). • Screenings Compaction -The District is proceeding with installation of compaction equipment at both Plants No. 1 and No. 2. This equipment has been tested on material from bar screens with 1-inch bar spacing. The proposed demonstration testing will assess if the equipment performs adequately on the material removed with smaller bar spacing. The FSM auger type compactors could be tested alone, and in series with the screenings washer to assess the difference in screenings quality and dryness. At this stage the District would like to test the FSM compactor alone. • Shaftless Conveyors—Carollo recommends using shaftless conveyors for screenings.The District may wish to obtain a demonstration unit to use during the testing to observe performance of this technology. Based on the results of the demonstration testing, the District can decide on the type of equipment to use for the proposed Plant No.2 screenings handling facility. The parties involved in this effort are as follows: 1. OCSD Operations, Maintenance, Construction Management, and Laboratory. 2. Carollo Engineers. 3. IDI and Misco. 4. Hycor and GMI. S. Small contractor for bar screen Installation. 6. Small contractor for Hycor unloading, installation, set-up, and loading. 7. Outside laboratory. 3. PROJECT ELEMENTS The specific tasks for this amendment are defined as follows: Task B1 — Prepare Test Plans Carollo will prepare four tests plans; one for the bar screens, one for the screenings washer, one for the District furnished auger compactor and one for the shaftless conveyor. A draft test plan will be prepared and submitted to the District for review and comment. District comments will be incorporated, as appropriate, and final test plans will be issued. Each test plan will describe the following: H.'01- nkW enow,c MWW2ddwddoa Mn 6 d • Purpose and Goals of the Test. • Responsibilities of Each of the District's Departments, Carollo, and the Equipment Supplier. • Safety Provisions. • Code Compliance. • Test Setup Provisions. • Utility Requirements. • Samplinglresting Protocols. • Schedule. Task B2—Coordination with Equipment Suppliers During Installation and Testing Carollo will prepare a scope of supply for the Hycor screenings washer and a shaftless screw conveyor for inclusion in a contract between the District and Hycor. The scope of supply will identify the equipment to be fumished, the schedule,the responsibilities of the Equipment Supplier's staff during the test period, shipping and removal of equipment on completion of the test. In addition, Carollo will assist the District in updating the schedule for supply and coordinating between the Hycor supplier and loading/unloading Contractor. Carollo will also assist the District in managing the various parties involved. Any contracts between the District and Hycor will be prepared by the District staff. Task B3 — Contract Documents Revise drawings and other contract documents to District standards as directed by the District's project manager. Task B4— Provide Coordination and Direction During Installation and Testing of the Equipment Construction management and inspection will be provided by the District staff. Carollo will assist the District as described below. Carollo staff will visit the job site as follows: • During Screenings Removal Data Collection: One visit per week. • During Washer and Compactor Tests: One visit per week. Carollo will review available data, discuss testing concerns, and will confirm that the testing is proceeding in accordance with the test plan.Where required, modifications to the plan will be identified and implemented. The following coordination meetings are budgeted. Carollo will prepare meeting minutes for each meeting: 1. Meetings with District Maintenance Staff or Small Projects Contractors: a. Pre-bidlob-walk meeting for bar screen installation. b. Bid period and construction management assistance (bar screens). Up to 4 hours of on- call assistance will be provided. n:\a�nhoosd3AOW6onnaulw2-6swddM-Anna« 7 0 c. Observe completed installation/witness start-up. d. Pre-bid(ob-walk meeting for Hycor installation e. Bid period and construction management assistance (Hycor). Up to 4 hours of on-call assistance will be provided. f. Observe completed installation/Witness start-up. 2. Meetings with District Operations Staff: a. One meeting prior to each phase of testing. Go over test goals, procedures, and schedule. 3. Meetings with District Laboratory Personnel: a. Two meetings: One prior to testing to go over sampling and lab test procedures and a second meeting during the test period. 4. Meetings with Engineering Staff: a. Meet with District's project manager and engineering staff once a month to review project status, scheduled work efforts, test results to date, and other District concerns. The total duration for demonstration testing is assumed to be 12 weeks. 5. Additional On-Call Assistance: a. At this time, several issues have not been investigated,test plans have not been developed, and bid documents have not been prepared. Up to 120 manhours will be reserved to cover unanticipated issues that may arise and will be used only as directed by the District. Task B5— Evaluate Test Data For each test, Carollo will obtain test data from the District and analyze the data for correlation and trends. For the bar screen retrofit, the evaluation will address screenings removal efficiency, hydraulic impacts, maintenance requirements, quality of screenings and comparison to the P2- 66 proposed design criteria for screenings. For the screenings handling equipment,the evaluation will focus on the suitability of equipment for the collected screenings and helping the District decide on washing and compaction. Task 86 — Summary Workshop A half-day workshop will be conducted to review the results and findings of all demonstration testing. Carollo will also present conclusions and recommendations. Task 67— Prepare Final Test Reports Carollo will prepare two final test reports, one for the bar screen retrofit and one for the Hycor/FSM tests. A write-up summarizing the observations and conclusions from the shaftless screw demonstration will be also be submitted. The final test report will describe the following: • Test Objectives. • Background. H:010nhOCW_SAOV Mre P2-S ddW-A .dm 8 • Test Results, Analyses, and Findings. • Summary and Conclusions. • Appendix with Test Photos and Captions. • Appendix with Field Test Data. • Appendix with Laboratory Test Results. Task B8— Project Management Carollo will attend a monthly project manager's meeting for the duration of the work included in this amendment to review project status, proposed activities, schedule, work sequence, and District concerns. 4. SCHEDULE Carollo will begin work immediately on Notice to Proceed and will submit the draft test plans and Hycor's scope of supply within 45 days after notice to proceed. Final test plans will be submitted two weeks after receipt of District's comments on the draft test plans.The final test reports will be submitted 21 days after the Summary Workshop. BUDGET A not-to-exceed budget has been developed for Tasks Al through 138 and is presented in the attached Exhibit 1.The revised contract budget is as follows: Original Addendum Addendum Addendum Revised Contract No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 Contract Burdened Labor Cost $160,080 $11,245 $11,263 $99,710 $282,298 Overhead 163,280 11,469 11,487 101,705 $287,941 Profit 31,690 2,226 2,230 19,738 $55,884 Subconsultants 15,000 $15,000 Expenses 4,950 3,000 $7,950 Total Contract Price $375,000 $24,940 $24,980 $224,153 $649,073 WD9 nWW snovnoonn,on 2 ddx AMAW 9 EXHIBIT 1 (Page 1 of 2) e ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PLANT NO.2 NEADWORKS REPLACEMENT JOB NO.P2,68 PROJECT COST REDUCTION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS,RETROFIT 8 DEMONSTRATION TESTING PSA AMENDMENT NO.3 BUDGET ESTIMATE PART A Project Lead Took No. Project Elements Principal Manager Engineer Technician Support Total Al Eveluab Alternatives for Potential Coal Reduction 1a Content Project (Note'.work completed in original pan) 0 to Current Project with cool reductions of Eliminate moue irg and diversion 2 2 4 a 11,2 Eliminate provisions for future 96inctl 2 2 4 4 12 w J Larger bar screen be,spacing 2 8 16 8 34 11,4 Ehmmale bridge crane 2 6 = 12 40 1b5 Reduce space between soeens 2 4 20 8 34 I1,6 Alternate buildlrg materials 2 a 6 4 22 11,7 Screens alley pumping 2 2 8 4 16 Ib.B Eliminate screenings washing 2 2 4 B Ib.9 Eliminate one screenings bay 2 4 8 14 1b.10 Reduce number of pumps 2 2 8 12 tbAl Eliminate check valves 2 8 2a 4 34 11b.12 Use immersible mot. 2 2 4 0 lb.13 Use monorails 2 2 16 4 24 1p14 PrevMO mix W constant speed am VFN 2 2 8 4 16 tb.15 Reduce opened got hasin design croetla 2 2 16 4 24 w.w Eliminate one grit❑eloper 2 8 18 a 36 lb.17 Use vodek got batons (Note:work conceded in original=a) 0 lb.18 Reduce vWlex design criteria 2 2 4 long Eliminate one gift storage any 2 2 4 8 1h.20 EIIMnate phmerp Influent meters 2 4 4 10 lb.21 Delete composite over chemical storage 2 2 2 a lon Reduce else of statehood building 2 4 24 30 28 Covert project for 340 mgd only 2 24 40 66 21, 340 mod Pointed was of otical 2 a 16 28 3 New matadng and ScraeNnp with chat reductions,rehab Pumping and grit 16 28 142 32 210 Lefler Report 2 6 4 12 Estimate Coat Uebg P1.20 0 A2 Meat am sw 2A it 2WoMMdg a 6 Is 0 a 2a 2.2 Rehab Plan Workshop 6 10 20 12 6 so 2.3 Alternative selection workshop 12 8 44 16 4 S4 A3 Architectural Concept 8 12 64 0 4 as AC "Slat wish Presentation Matedals 4 16 12 0 10 42 Total Labor Hour 92 196 522 124 36 1020 Burdemd Rob $ 74.75 $ 6095 S 52.45 $ 43.2S $ 31,50 Bur08nad LO W Cast S 6,822 S 11,946 S 30.001 S 5.30 S 1.134 $ 55,321 Ovarhlt 01mix, S 56,426 Expense. S 1,Saa Proat 09.8% $ 10,951 TOTAL PART $ 124,200 amen 0a taw= EXHIBIT 1 (Page 2 of 2) e a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PLANT NO.2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT JOB NO.P2-66 PROJECT COST REDUCTION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS,RETROFIT A DEMONSTRATION TESTING PEA AMENDMENT NO.3 BUDGET ESTIMATE PART B Project Lead Task No. Project Elements Princlpal Manager Engineer Technician Support Total all Prepare tool plane Bar sewn. 2 12 16 2 0 40 Hycor Screening.washer 2 10 14 4 6 36 FSM sugar compactor 2 10 14 4 6 36 Sha8lesoscrewconveyor 4 8 2 4 18 B2 Coordination with equipment suppliers Prepare Scope of Supply for washer and shelties.screw 2 4 8 4 10 Coordlnallon with Hinrer 4 4 a Cooldlnellon we,Of 4 4 6 B3 Banned Contract Documents(as directed) 10 30 W 34 10 114 134 Coordination&direction for equipment installation and tasting Job Bile vies. 4 34 34 72 Meetings Man Melnlenance/Contractors 16 16 6 38 Meetings walh Cperalions 12 12 4 28 Meetings Win Lab 4 4 2 10 Meetings with Engineering 6 6 4 16 Prepare heeling manages 4 10 10 24 McI lonsl On-Cell A cal.wc,(a.directed) 10 30 30 40 10 120 85 Evaluate bat data Berscroons 2 6 8 10 Screening,handling equipment 4 10 12 20 BE Summery Workshop 8 0 10 4 4 34 B7 Prepare final teal reports Bar screen relmlil 2 a 16 4 6 36 Hycor6 FSM 4 10 20 4 6 44 Shsldess screw conveyor 2 6 2 10 BE Monthly progress mealinpe 18 10 30 Total Labor Houre 70 248 282 9s 92 790 Burdened Rate $ 78.46 $ 64.00 $ 55.07 $ 45.41 $ 33.08 Burdened labor Cost $ 5.494 $ 15.071 $ 15.&0 $ 4.450 S 3,043 $ 44.389 Overhead 01 W% $ 45,27T Expenses $ 1,500 Pra11109.9% $ 8,787 TOTAL PART B $ 99,90 ..arm twim TOTAL PART A A PART 0 $ 224,153 The FAHR Minutes of the meeting held November 8, 2000, were not available for this mailing. These minutes will be distributed at the November 15, 2000 Board of Directors meeting. Once the minutes are finalized, they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd.com). FAHR COMMITTEE r ng D� To Bd.of qr. uioe1oo urls1oo AGENDA REPORT 1OeniNumbu 1teniNoin° FAHRgg-BS 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of October 2000. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H1wy.J WWp l W� Rerwb\]CWRUN Ap RspN ilf I4C)� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts October 31,2000 Yield (%) State of Calif.LAW $ 10,987,117 6.5 Union Bank Checking Account 462,866 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,499,000 5.8 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 33,621,395 6.5 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 349,859,487 5.4 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1,703 5.8 Debt Service Reserves wrl-rustees 35,250,891 6.4 Petty Cash 8.00 N/A 31 A TOTAL 5490 459 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC NaOonWa�e9wp 01aNn@IObane6AHRVaF0000woNFAXRf IDBWRmsRpMpv.4oc Rexsed'. WM8 Page 2 District Fund Balances .......... \\\ ..... ..... ..... ,:•:•:•:•: :•:•:•:•, •:•0:•:•: :i:i:i0: :ii , . , . LTI . , . *Debt Service GLAIF Dist 11 GO Bond Fund 1 � MONTHLY REPORT ' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ended 31 October 2000) Long-Tenn Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $350,463,064 • Mellon $349,959,487 Historical Cost: PIMCO $347,833,791 Mellon $349,486,790 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.25 Of Index: 2.26 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gaintIon)of 1%Change: $7,977,722 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 34% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.73 0.45 3 Months: 2.47 2.30 12 Months: 7.02 6.29 Year-to-Date: 6.74 6.10 Commentary • Three-month yields increased during October(964sy T-Bills up 17 basis points to 6.380/.),however longer maturities declined(5-year Treasury Notes down 4 basis paints to 5.8(%). • The Long-Term pornalto outperformed its benchmark by 28 basis points in October,and has outperformed by 64 basis points year-to-date. • PIMCO's index duration was neutral for performance. • PIMM's focus on higher quality securities and an underweight allocation to consensus enhanced returns significantly m mrporetes underyeRormed the broader market. • Holdings of mortgage backed securities enhanced retums as this sector outperformed the broader market w"bu�nr�rpObSanV]MMrMT�YMP^K.ImtaafbamAPiNv MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 October 1000) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $33,627,054 Mellon $33,621,395 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $33,658,295 • Mellon $33,658,327 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.27 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $91,990 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 56% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 3%(See Note) 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" See Note 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.57 0.52 3 Months: 1.71 1.53 12 Months: 6.49 5.74 Year-to-Date: 5.53 4.87 Commentary • Interest rats at the short�end of the yield curve rose In September(Wree-month T-Bills up 17 basis points to 6 38%),while the long-end posted docent"(30-year Treasuries down 10 basis points to 5.79%). • The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 5 basis points in October,and outperformed by 66 basis points year-t-dale. • PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes enhanced miums. • NOTE: ICI Wilmington debenture,S1,000,000 par amount.9.5%coupon,maturing on November 15,2000(currently rated BBB+by S&P),arc held in the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio. a:i"PdaW.ounwn.tr...iyXe.vg mwvsxrrm Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 1 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-OCT-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 51,029.78 51,029.78 0.01% 0.00 PAYABLES -34,084,453.13 -34,084,453.13 -9.63% 0.00 TOTAL -34,033.423.35 -34,033,423.35 462% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 49,213,049.53 49,213,049.53 13.90% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,775,957.77 1,775,857.77 0.50% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 1,090,026.67 1,090,026.67 0.31% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 534,951.49 534,931.49 0.15% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 52,613,885.46 52,613,885.46 14.86% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 2.if sw 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 45,368,315.85 45,760,730.04 12.93% 392,414.19 U.S.AGENCIES 122,021,628.45 122,794,400.80 34.69% 762,772.35 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 28,211,406.25 28,229,835.00 7.98% 17,428.75 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 14,025,203.97 14,084,297.16 3.98% 39,093.19 FHLMC POOLS 8,122,831.82 7,970,661.99 2.25% -152,169.83 FHLMC MULTICLASS 4,919,583.61 4,787,618.25 1.35% -131,965.36 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 9,765.90 9,747.55 0.00% -18.35 ABS:HOME EQUITY 183,319.68 182,745.89 0.05% -573.79 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 994,520.00 0.28% -5,490.00 BANKING&FINANCE 73,670,993.81 73,462,550.42 20.76% -208,443.39 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,929,440.45 1.96% -196,749.55 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,096,080.00 7,957,430.00 2.25% -139,650.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,304,526.00 2.06% 4,526.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,375,950.00 2.08% •121,305.00 G.O.CITY/MUNI 1,723,280.00 1,760,540.00 0,50% 37.260.00 HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,685,031.30 0,48% 54,557.25 TOTAL UNITED STATES 330,906,327.39 331,279,024.85 93.60% 37Z697.46 08-No 2000 10..36.54 NTcufiw W mh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-OCT-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ------330-.F6W27N 331,279,024.89 93.60% 3ffW7g OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,087,893.17 4,087,993.17 1.15% 0.00 TOTAL 4,087,893.17 4,087,893.17 1.15% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS �4, T99 1.15% NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 353,579,662.67 353,947,380.13 100.00% 372,697.46 OB-Nw-2000 10:36:54 Executive Wor emh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSFV7511102 31-OCT-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 5,010,970.00 5,010,970.00 14.71% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN IYR 6,603,640.56 6,603,640.56 19.38% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 5,637,539.12 5,637,539.12 16.55% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,175,208.91 6,175,208.91 18.13% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 249,296.22 249,296.22 0.73% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,676,654.81 23,676,654.81 69.50% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �7 . T 23,676AUSI 69.50% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.AGENCIES 270,799.06 273,022.75 0.80% 2,233.69 BANKING&FINANCE 6,581,286.00 6,576,393.90 19.30% 4,892.10 INDUSTRIAL 1,125,590.00 1,103,698.00 324% -21,902.00 UTILITY-OAS 495,945.00 498,895.00 1.46% 3,050.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 1,508,162.20 1,492,740.20 4.39% -15,422.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,981,672.26 9.944.739.95 29.19% -36,932.41 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES ,981 19% -31T3YXI OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 444,640.28 444,640.28 1.31% 0.00 TOTAL 444,640.28 444,640.28 1.31% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 444,640.28 444,640.28 1311/6 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 34,102,967.35 34,066,034.94 100.00% -36,932.41 08-Nov-2000 10:33:45 Exemitw Workbewh YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 1 OCSF00511102 2000/10/31 RUN DATE i 11/06/00 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 15.23.05 ==veav======v-====v=cnvuv=====_____________=====v=v=======v=====__=====e=====_.====a===vucuvvvvvvssvccvunv=====v======v===vvva PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY BAREST TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HARRET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 249,296.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 6.331 AAA 100.000 249,296.22 1.05 996085247 AAA 249,296.22 .74 6,800,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 6.290 .000 P-1 90.112 6,603,640.56 22.89 912295GC9 04/19/2001 DD 10/19/00 A-1+ 6,603,640.56 19.64 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN KID CORP DISC 6.456 .000 P-1 99.129 2,279,964.45 9.62 313396N66 HAT 11/07/2000 A-I+ 2,279,964.45 6.08 673,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HID ASSN DISC NT 6.464 .000 P-1 99.004 666,299.91 2.81 313588848 MAT 12/07/2000 A-1+ 666,299.91 1.99 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP DISC 6.409 .000 P-1 98.323 2,271,786.67 9.59 313396055 MAT 11/22/2000 A-1+ 2,271.086.67 6.76 5.600rOOO.00 FEDERAL NATL BIG ABSN DISC NTH 6.541 .000 P-1 90.373 5,508,909.00 23.26 31358ON93 MAT 11/02/2000 A-I+ 5,500,909.00 16.39 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOBE LN MG CORP DISC 6.545 .000 P-1 98.908 1,085,788.00 4.50 313390AL5 MAT O1/11/2001 A-lh 1,085,088.00 3.23 900,000.00 VENISON GLOBL FOG DISC 6.560 .000 96.508 086,574.75 3.04 92344ANC0 12/12/2000 886,574.75 2.64 900.000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.576 .000 P-1 98.542 886.BI8.00 3.04 07588RLUI 11/28/2000 886,878.00 2.64 600.000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 6.638 .000 90.36I 590,205.00 2.49 43851RLM0 21/21/2000 590,205.00 1.76 900,000.00 HEINZ H J CO DISC 6.642 .000 P-1 97.869 880,025.00 3.72 42300JNN6 01/22/2001 880.825.00 2.62 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.663 .000 P-1 98.308 884,771.25 3.93 36959HNK9 01/19/2001 884,271.25 2.63 900,000.00 DAIRLERCHRYSLER DISC 6.665 .DOD 99.968 881.016.00 3.72 233BEONXO O1/31/2001 B81,916.00 2.62 YLDASAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 2 MSF07511102 2000/10/31 RUN DATE 11/06/00 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 15.23.05 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE A TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.329 .101 23,676,654.81 100.00 23,676,654.01 00.43 FIXED INCONH SECURITIES 900,000.00 GENERAL MINH CORP HIS 6.425 9.610 A2 100.158 922,060.00 9.06 370442AHO 9.6251 12/01/2000 DO 12/01/90 A 901,422.00 2.69 500,000.00 GTE CORP DEB 6.669 9.363 A2 100.132 512,080.00 5.03 362320AQ6 9.375% 12/01/2000 A+ 500,660.00 1.49 440,D00.00 FORD SIR CO DEL 6.844 B.BIB A2 101.375 448,219.20 4.48 345370AY6 9.000% 09/15/2001 DD 09/15/91 A 446,050.00 1.33 1,002,000.00 WORLDCCH INC SR HIS 6.845 6.186 A3 99.010 996,082.20 9.97 98155XAF9 6.125% 00/15/2001 DD 06/11/98 A- 992,080.20 2.95 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MIN 4 SR 00010 6.862 5.659 Al 99.409 133t383.00 1.74 12560QM5 5.625% 02/02/2001 DD 02/02/96 A+ 173,962.25 .52 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MIN OTR 00006 6.899 6.184 A3 99.229 495,845.00 5.01 90269QAF6 6.130% 03/06/2001 OD 03/06/98 A- 490,895.00 1.48 200,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.943 5.943 A3 93.410 197,332.00 1.93 42333HKJO 5.050% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/50 A- 196,020.00 .59 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 6.960 8.405 A3 101.133 202,730.00 2.03 122014AD5 8.500% 10/01/2001 DO 10/17/91 A- 202,266.00 .60 250,000.00 CHASE HMHATTAN CORD NEW SUB 6.984 9.236 Al 101.500 254.730.00 2.55 16161M41 9.3758 07/01/2001 DO 07/01/89 A 253t750.00 .75 275,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CORE BUS 7.058 5.173 AAA 99.201 270,789.06 2.24 3133MRA2 5.1406 05/02/2001 DO 21/02/98 AAA 273.022.35 .81 500,000.00 BANPONCE FINL CORP MIN 400081 7.316 6.269 A3 99.725 496,495.00 5.01 06670QDJ4 6.750% 08/09/2001 DO 08/09/96 BBHi 498,625.00 1.48 2,000,000.00 ICI WILHINGTON INC GTD NT 7.344 9.495 BAA2 100.055 1,008,480.00 10.06 449909MG 9.500% 11/15/2000 EBB. 1,000,550.00 2.98 1,000,000.00 MISTAR INC SR NT 3.346 3.735 A3 100.196 1,003,830.00 10.00 040420ATS 7.7501 06/15/2001 DD 07/07/94 A- 1,001,960.00 2.98 .1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PADS 3 OCSF0I511102 2000/10/31 RUN DATE t 11/06/00 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 15.23.05 ..............eve.....................e.............................................=....................................... PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NODDY KARKET TOTAL COST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------------------- ------- --- ------- -------- --- -- ---------- 1,000,000.00 PLSET/NORSTAR FINL GROUP INC 7.365 9.751 A3 101.524 1,024,020.00 10.20 33901SADS 9.90DA 06/15/2001 DO 06/24/91 A- 1,015,240.00 3.02 575,000.00 FCC NAIL BE DE NTN 1 TR 002B4 7.426 6.383 AT2 99.075 570,262.00 5.77 3D241NW4 6.395% 03/15/2001 DO 03/14/96 AA- 574,281.25 1.71 420,000.00 SANKANERICA CORP SR NT 7.441 6.654 AA2 99.937 417,034.00 4.22 066050CJ2 6.630% 05/01/3001 DO OS/01/96 At 419,735.40 1.25 1,000,000.00 DONALDSON LUFXIN 6 JEN M00011 7.530 6.138 A3 99.542 987,060.00 10.00 25766CALE 6.110% 05/25/2001 DO 05/27/98 A- 995,420.00 2.96 ------- _________________ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6.901 7.971 9,981,672.26 100.00 9,944,I39.85 29.58 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 6.496 2.378 33,658,327.07 200.00 33,621,394.66 100.00 ................. ........ YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 4 O SF07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE t 11/06/00 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIMC 15.23.05 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY HARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 534,951.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 6.331 AAA 100.000 534,951.49 1.01 996085247 AAA 534,951.49 .14 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC NT 6.459 .000 P-1 99.093 1,090,026.67 2.D1 313588548 HAT 12/07/2000 A-1+ 1,090,026.67 .28 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN HIS CORP DISC 6.489 .000 P-1 98.631 1,282,204.44 2.43 313396U27 NAT 12/21/2000 A-1+ 1,282,204.44 .33 500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN PTO CORP DISC 6.519 .000 P-1 98.731 493,653.33 .93 313396R54 NAT 11/30/2000 A-I♦ 493,653.33 .13 6,300,000.00 VERIEON GLOBL PON DISC 6.563 .000 98.740 6,220,620.00 11.82 92344ALA5 11/10/2000 6,220,620.00 1.62 5,7D0.000.00 CANTRELL SOUP CO DISC 6.564 .ODD P-1 90.562 5,618,046.67 10.63 13443AM21 12/07/2000 5,618,046.67 1.46 1,000,000.00 VERIEON CLOSE, FOG DISC 6.568 .000 99.508 985,083.O6 1.82 92344AMCO 12/12/2000 905,083.06 .26 11,300,000.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 6.536 .000 98.241 11,101,283.22 21.09 43851RMF4 12/15/2000 11,101,283.22 2.89 7,600,000.00 NINNSTA RED 6 Mn DISC 6.529 .000 P-1 98.498 2.485,088.00 14.22 60406AMK4 12/19/2000 7,485,088.00 1.95 3.100,000.00 ANERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 6.603 .000 P-1 98.442 6,989,752.79 13.20 03018AMD0 12/13/2000 6,989,752.70 1.82 800,000.00 DAINLERCHRYSLER DISC 6.629 .000 98.210 705,678.00 1.49 2338EOML7 12/20/2000 785,678.00 .20 300,000.00 DAINLERCHRYSLER DISC 6.634 .000 98.137 294,412.25 .55 233890NX0 01/31/2001 294,412.25 .08 6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.638 .000 P-1 90.367 6,098,785.00 11.59 36959HNA1 01/10/2001 6,098,785.00 1.59 1:000.00D.00 HONEYWELL INTL DISC 6.638 .000 98.362 983,675.00 1.86 43851RLM0 11/21/2000 9B3,615.00 .26 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 5 WSF07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DAM 1 11/06/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 15.23.05 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,900,000.00 DU PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 6.646 .000 P-1 93.957 1,861,175.09 3.53 26354AM68 12/06/2000 1,861,175.09 .48 800,000.00 BELL ATLNTIC FINL DISC 10.022 .000 P-1 90.691 789,450.46 1.50 00385AL19 11/01/2D00 789,450.46 .21 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.451 .123 52,613,685.46 100.00 52,613,885.46 13.20 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 288,695.10 FMLMC GROUP 138-6064 .000 6.490 AAA 97.844 281,658.17 .08 31348SME3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 282.47D.83 .02 1,232,298.47 GUM II POOL 10080395 .000 6.510 AAA 99.844 1,221,130.76 .39 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 1,230,376.08 .32 9,893,416.34 GNMA II POOL 008040OX .000 6.510 AAA 99.844 9,792,936.33 2.98 36225CH28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 9.073r982.61 2.50 0,842,142.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.315 3.618 AAA 100.187 8,912.022.19 2.60 9128273AO 3.625% D711512002 DD 07/15/97 AAA 8,859,676.82 2.31 25,070,230.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.920 3.465 AAA 99.406 24,223,406.16 9.33 9128232M3 3.335% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 24,419,908.23 6.36 1,083,762.40 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY RLDGS IMF 4.911 3.684 AA3 99.073 1,849,861.61 .56 39549BBG1 3.650% 02/14/2002 DD 02/14/97 A 1,866,299.92 .49 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES COUP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.554 Al 99.196 1,543,215.00 .44 G460D3HY8 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 Ai 1,407,640.00 .39 3,950,000.00 GMAC HIS 5.752 6.845 A2 100.232 3,918,768.50 1.19 370425QVS FLTG RT DO/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 A 3.959.164.00 1.03 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.960 5.843 A3 98.410 999,730.00 .29 42333UJO 5.350% 09/25/20DI DO 09/25/98 A- 984,100.00 .26 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 100570 5.795 6.998 A2 100.161 999,188.90 .30 44181KST4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 OD 09/04/98 A 1.0U1.630.00 .26 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUS GUM SF MTG 5.092 6.368 AAA 94.218 5,873,046.88 1.77 OIN0606B3 6.000% 11/15/2028 AAA 5,808,625.00 1.53 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 6 OCSF07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE 1 11/06/00 DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 1 15.23.05 =mm....v.....v.v..............................v..................................................................v..v........ PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ _____--_-- 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.804 6.632 A3 59.609 2,060,739.00 .59 81240WW6 6.540% 02/20/20D3 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,917,110.45 .52 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.849 6.661 A3 99.531 3,073,170.00 .90 81240QJAI 6.630% O7/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 2,985,930.00 .78 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.881 6.794 Al 100.357 1,992,800.00 .60 0663650W4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 2,007,140.00 .52 145,834.05 FMLMC MULTICL MIO P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.922 99.625 145,628.97 .04 3133TO3D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 145,297.17 .D4 1,945,000.DO NEW JERSEY NITA CARE SER B 5.942 5.483 AAA 86.634 1,630,474.05 .50 64579E M0 4.750% 07/01/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 1,685,031.30 .44 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN GERA SF MID 5.953 6.734 AAA 96.531 13,966,406.25 4.22 O1N062GB3 6.5001 11/15/2030 AAA 13,996,995.00 3.65 15.000,DOG.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 5.981 S.S54 AAA 99.422 14,955,300.00 4.50 31364G2VO 5.820% 07/19/2002 DO 07/19/99 AAA 14,913,300.00 3.60 2,500,000.00 MEARILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.423 AA3 99.260 2,526,725.00 .74 590188XP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,481,500.00 .65 2,000,000.00 MONTGOMERY ALA BMC SER B 6.001 5.600 AAA 00.027 1,723,280.00 .53 613041GH9 5.000% 11/15/2029 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,760,540.00 .46 7,500,000.00 SELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.101 AA 98.346 7,497,255.00 2.22 079067AXS 6.000% 06/15/2002 OD 06/15/98 AAA 7,375,950.00 1.92 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN WIG CORP DEBS 6.O62 6.027 AAA 99.545 12,4B5,625.00 3.75 3134A3SM1 6.000% 07/20/2001 DD 07/20/99 AAA 12,443,125.00 3.24 2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR HIS 6.133 6.197 A2 98.836 1,999,600.00 .59 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 1,976,720.00 .51 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.134 6.660 AAA 131.391 12,332,187.50 3.76 912810EG9 08.750E 08/15/2020 DD 08/15/90 AAA 12,482,145.D0 3.25 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN ITROO615 6.154 6.140 Al 100.062 1,499,415.00 .45 17120QE80 FLTG RT O8/09/2002 DO 04/08/90 At 1,500,930.00 .39 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 4TR 00311 6.180 7.649 AA 100.125 1,699,517.20 .51 61745ENY3 FLTG AT D1128/2002 DO 01/27/00 AA- 1,702,125.00 .44 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE : 7 OCBF07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE 1 11/06/00 DISTRICT: LONG-TARN OPERATING RUN TINE , 15.23.05 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL C0ST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 9 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 9,765.91 FIFTH THIRD BR AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.212 AAA 99.912 9,765.90 .00 31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 9,747.55 .00 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MIN 4TR 00004 6.201 6.234 A3 99.452 1,000,000.00 .30 73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BOB. 994,520.00 .26 2,000,000.00 FORD MIN CA CO TERM ENHANCED 6.221 6.213 A2 59.953 1,998,613.60 .60 345397SC8 FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,060.00 .52 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDIEDN N Y DEBS 6.271 6.181 Al 100.003 2,194,300.00 .90 209111CUS FLTG AT 06/15/2002 DD 06/20/97 A4 3,000,090.00 .78 103,319.6B GREEN TREE CORP 99-0 Cl, A-1 6.290 6.310 AAA 99.697 193,319.66 .05 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 192,745.89 .05 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTI A68N RTN 6.291 6.252 AAA 99.656 4,488,705.00 1.35 31364CEV5 6.2301 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 AAA 4,484,520.00 1.17 3,000,000.00 HELLER FIRL KIN ITR 00246 6.300 6.335 A3 95.453 3,000,000.00 .90 42333RLF7 FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,983,590.00 .78 3,800,000.00 GENERAL HTRS ACCEP OTR 00562 6.303 6.273 A2 99.765 3,793,950.00 1.14 37042MRO FLTU RT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3,791,070.00 .99 2,770,037.10 FULKC KULTICLASN CTF E3 A 6.316 6.866 AAA 96.763 2,773,066.64 .80 3133ME95 VAR RT O0/15/2032 AAA 2,680,371.08 .70 2,449,268.37 GRIM GTD REKIC TR 2000-9 FR 6.320 6.294 AAA 100.409 2,449,268.37 .74 3637H4NE9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,459,285.08 .64 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEAMS CON INC 6.330 6.041 A2 90.671 2,031,560.00 .59 073902MI 6.750E 04/15/2003 A 1,973,420.00 .51 3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CR CO GLOBAL LANDRARR 6.350 6.998 A2 99.562 3,000,000.00 .90 345397SR5 FLTG AT 03/17/2003 DO 03/26/00 A 2,986,860.00 .78 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 6.875 A2 99.562 1,992,SB0.00 .60 345397RV7 FLTG AT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/90 A 1,991,240.00 .52 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BE CONE BDS 6.404 6.807 AAA 101.000 29,443,671.00 8.87 3133MBY04 6.875% 00/15/2003 DO 09/07/00 AAA 29,391,000.00 7.66 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MIN 4.440 6.434 A3 100.007 4,000,000.00 1.20 44181REA5 FLTG AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 A 4,003,480.00 1.04 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSP07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE 11/06/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.23.05 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ____-----_ 2,000,000.00 PHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI1 A6 6.496 6.626 AAA 98.098 2,000,888.00 .59 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,961,960.00 .51 2,496,129.26 FNLMC MULTICLAHB CTF HER 16202 6.507 2.185 AAA 83.508 2,339,989.32 .12 3133T13A4 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,084,467.62 .54 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.503 7.029 A3 100.048 2,DDD,D00.00 .60 423328BKB ELM RT O6/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,000,960.00 .52 5,000,000.00 SALOMON RB HLDGS MTN 6.625 6.969 AA3 99.921 5,000,000.00 1.50 79540ERES ELM RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 A 4,996,050.00 1.30 I,I2Or540.22 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 6.628 2.029 AAA 99.581 7,841,173.65 2.32 312ODDOSS 3.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/99 AAA 7,688,191.16 2.00 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00333 6.632 7.648 A3 10D.8I8 2.322,339.OD .I0 52537PPM5 ELM AT 04/01/2002 DO 03/29/99 A 2r320,194.00 .60 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MUCH MTN 6.634 7.327 A3 100.312 5,000,000.00 1.51 52517PDD7 ELM RT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A 5,015,600.00 1.31 1,715,999.74 GNMA II POOL 0080088H 6.I05 6.331 AAA 100.688 1,753,537.24 .52 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 1,727,805.82 .45 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN MIG COMP DEBS 6.311 6.423 AAA 98.032 10,323,075.00 3.10 3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/01/99 AAA 30,293,255.D0 2.68 2,OOD,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.317 6.738 A2 98.320 1,992,280.00 .59 57174BABS 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO O6114/99 AA- 1,966,400.00 .51 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.339 6.840 A2 97.953 2,995,08D.00 .89 345391SJ3 6.3001 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A 2,938,590.00 .77 900,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN BE CONS BOB 6.777 6.729 AAA 100.312 899,55D.00 .22 3133MQJI 6.750% 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 902,008.00 .24 5,450,000.00 CIT GRP INC MTN 96R 00042 6.810 6.814 Al 99.933 5,450,000.00 1.64 12560PBT1 FLTG RT 09/13/2002 DO 09/01/00 A+ 5,446,566.50 1.42 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE MOMS US INC NT 6.866 6.963 A3 98.373 2,498,400.00 .34 22237UADS 6.050% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,459,325.00 .64 7,300,000.00 OMEGA INC NEW NT 6.960 7.403 A2 100.062 I,300,000.OD 2.20 682680AJ2 ELM RT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,304,526.00 1.90 YLDAM YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 OCBF07522202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE t 11/06/00 DISTRICTt TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 15.23.05 ...................................=....................................................................................... PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,237,110.00 GNNA II POOL /0080023 6.992 7.062 AAA 100.091 1,257,599.64 .37 36225=9 7.125% 22/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 MA 1,240,132.65 .33 2,000,000.00 GANA GTD REMIC M 2000-2 PA 7.014 7.009 AM 99.070 1,996,075.00 .60 3837N3C70 7.0001 12/20/2022 AM 11997,400.00 .52 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MR 8B 00001 7.084 7.486 A2 99.671 7,000,000.00 2.10 67962%MG VAR AT 11/01/200S DD 04/28/00 A- 6,976,970.00 1.02 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL AID ASSN DEES 7.113 6.665 AAA 99.406 2,030,133.00 .63 31339MEYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,007,526.00 .54 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTO CO DEB 7.512 8.552 BARI 95.687 2,151,250.00 .57 542671CT7 9.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 1,917,740.00 .50 1,306,475.77 BAZEMORE SVCNG CORP FBA 195-7 7.564 7.467 AAA 99.500 1,287,366.97 .20 398101A84 7.4301 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AM 1,299,943.39 .34 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA CO AT 7.582 6.930 A2 97.401 965,170.00 .29 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 974,010.00 .25 971,705.13 NMP/KUNYOON PAIGE 0000-11150 7.684 7.667 AM 97.028 950,600.91 .20 302998=3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 950,600.91 .25 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP BECD MTN ITR 00115 7.709 7.205 A2 101.320 2,950,530.00 .91 695128BUS 7.3001 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,039,600.00 .79 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN AM 7.724 6.812 AAA 95.422 32,498,400.00 10.13 313640Y32 6.500% 03/12/2009 DD 03/12/99 AAA 33,568,544.00 0.75 14,000,000.00 CONNIT TO PUR GNMA BF Am 7.773 7.670 AAA 101.656 14,245,000.00 4.29 01N0006BS 8.000% 11/13/2030 MA 14,231,040.00 3.71 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP OR AT 7.967 7.691 Al 102.396 2,594,032.00 .49 020002AL5 7.875% 05/01/2005 DD 05/02/00 A+ 1,630,336.00 .43 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.319 5.919 330,906,327.39 100.00 331,279,024.85 06.30 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 10 OCSF02532202 2000/10/31 RUN DATE 11/06/00 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE : 15.23.05 PAR VALUE TTN AT CURRENT NOOUY HAREEY TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HAREET VALUE 9 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- ---------- ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.362 5.698 383,520,212.85 100.00 393,892,910.31 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES SEPTEMBER 05-Oct-2000 -4.25 NA9123439 0.00 CW 05-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES SEPTEMBER 05-Oct-2000 -I3.60 NA9123459 0.00 CW 05-Oct-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 130,760.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-0et-2000 -130,760.86 996095247 02-0ct-2000 130,760.86 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 130,760.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Oct-2000 -130,760.86 996085247 02-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 02-Oo-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,700,000Z FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 04.Oct-2000 4,647,360.00 313384S34 MAT 12/06/2000 04-0c1-2000 4,647,360.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Nov-2000 11:30:04 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 04-Oc1-2000 4,647,360.00 313384S34 MAT 12/062000 04.Oct-2000 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 04-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-On-2000 -1,282,204.44 313396U27 MAT 12/21/2000 05-Oct-2000 1,292,204.44 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05.Oa-2000 -1,282.204.44 313396U27 MAT 12/21/2000 05.Oct-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 05-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 31,590.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Oct-2000 -31.590.00 996085247 10.Oct-2000 31,590.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 31,590.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Oct-2000 -31,590.00 996085247 10.Oct-2000 0.00 PC 10-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 10-0ct-2000 -900,000.00 99374DI84 06.4400A 10/112000 DO 10/10/ 10-Oct-2000 900,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 10-Oct-2000 -900,000.00 99374DI84 06.440%10(112000 DID 10/10/ 10-W-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 10-Oct-2000 0.00 07-Xo 2000 /4:50:42 F..I eWonlbe,rcA Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000l0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,289.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASI I MOM'I 11.Oct-2000 -9,299.00 996083247 11.Oct-2000 9,299.00 B 0.00 LIQUID UPER-PIAICII 9,299.00 DREYFUS"TREASURY CASH MGM I I.Oct-2000 -9,299.00 996085247 11.Oct-2000 0.00 FC II-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-Oct-2000 ,900,000.00 99374E232 06.350%10/12/2000 DO 10/11/ 11,00-2000 900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I I.Oct-2000 -900,000.00 99374E232 06.350%10/12/2000 DD 10/11/ 11-OU-2000 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I I.Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 11-0p-2000 -881,716.00 2338BONXO 01/31/2001 11-0ct-2000 881,716.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 11-Oct-2000 -881,716.00 2338ECNXO 01/31/2001 1I.Oct-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER I I.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 107,935.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-2000 407,935.00 996085247 12-Oct-2000 107,935.00 B 0.00 07-Nov-1000 /4:50:42 Ewculive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCsc000l0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 107,935.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-2000 ,107,935.00 996085247 12-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 12.Och2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 29,078.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Oct-2000 -28,078.68 996035247 12-Get-2000 28,078.68 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 28,079.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-W-2000 -28,078.68 996085247 12-Oa-2000 0.00 FC 12-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12.Oct-2000 -6,098,785.00 36959HNA1 01/10/2001 12.Oct-2000 6,098,785.00 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,00D.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Oa-2000 -6,098,785.00 3695914NA1 01/10/2001 12.0a-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 12-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-00-2000 -593,290.00 313396T37 MAT 12114/20DO 12-Oct-2000 593,280.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 12-Oct-2000 -593,280.00 313396T37 MAT 12/14/2000 12-Oct-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 12-Oct-2000 0.00 07-Now2000 14:50:42 Ec tlw WdFAwwA - Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsa000/6000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD•CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 673,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 12.Oct-2000 -666,299.91 313588S48 MAT 12/07/2000 12-Oct-2000 666,299.91 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 673.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 12-0ct-2000 -666,299.91 313588S48 MAT 12/072000 12-Oct-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 12-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 356,227.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Oct-2000 -356,227.64 996085247 16-0ct-2000 356.227.64 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 356.227.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Oct-2000 -356,227.64 996085247 16.Oct-2000 0.00 FC 16.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,265.83 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 16.Oct-2000 .53,265.83 996087094 16-Oct-2000 53,265.93 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 17.Od-2000 -1,090.026.67 313588S48 MAT 12/072000 17-Oct-2000 1,090,026.67 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 17-Oct-2000 -1,090,026.67 313588S48 MAT 12/072000 17-0ct.2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Oct-2000 0.00 07-NOv2000 14:50:42 Fiecutive Wo kbnmh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17.Oct-2000 -2,378,240.00 313396S46 MAT 12/07/2000 17-Oct-2000 2,378,240.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17.Oct-2000 -2,378,240.00 313396S46 MAT I2/07/2000 17-Oct-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17.Oct-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,891.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT IB-W-2000 -7,891.04 996095247 1B-Oct-2000 7,891.04 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,891.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 18.Oct-2000 -7,991.04 996095247 18.Oct-2000 0.00 PC I8.Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,229.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18.Oct-2000 -15,228.75 996085247 ISAct-2000 15,229.75 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,229.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASII MGMT 18.Oct-2000 -15,228.75 996085247 1S-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 18-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC IB-Oct-2000 -884,771.25 36959HNK9 01/19/2001 18.0M-2000 884,771.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 07-Now2000 14:50:42 &, wt.Wmkbenc& Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL a,G000/0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINtLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 18-W-2000 -884,771.25 36959HNK9 11111912001 18-0ct-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE:ll:NNI!It 18-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG IFRM OPER-PIMC'O 1,400,000.00 FL'DERAL I'IOME LN M-10 C014I'DIS I9.Oco-2000 -1,386,084.00 313396T37 MAT 12/14/2000 19-0n-2000 1,386,084.00 B MORGAN STANLEY R CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I9.Oct-2000 -1,386,084.00 313396T37 MAT 12/14/2000 19-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY R CO INC,NY 19-W-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 20-0<I-2000 -294,412.25 2338EONXO 01/31/2001 20-00-2000 294,412.25 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 20-Oct-2000 -294,412.25 2338EONXO 0IDI/2001 20.Oct-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20.Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 199,716.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Oct-2000 -I99,716.44 996085247 13.Oc1Q000 199,716A4 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 199,716.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23.Oct-2000 -199,716.44 996085247 23-Oc1-2000 0.00 FC 23.Oct-2000 0.00 07-Noo-2000 14:50:42 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G000/0000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 308,448.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Oct-2000 -308,448.41 996085247 24-Oct-2000 308,448.41 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 308,448.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24.Oct40W -308,448.41 996095247 24.Oct-2000 0.00 FC 24-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,849.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-2000 -20,949.82 996085247 25-Oct-2000 20,849.82 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,849.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Oct-2000 -20,849.82 996085247 25.Oct-2000 0.00 PC 25-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 132,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30.0cb2000 -132,000.00 996085247 30.Oct-2000 132,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 132,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30.Oct-2000 -132,000.00 996085247 30-Oc1.2000 0.00 PC 30.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,868.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Oct-2000 -175,868.13 996085247 30.Oct-2000 175,868.13 B 0.00 074 2000 14:50.•42 Ececudw Work6erteh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,868.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-00-2000 -175,868.13 996085247 30-Oa-2000 0.00 FC 30-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6.800.000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 30-OU-2000 -6,603,640.56 912795GC9 04/19/2001 DO 10/19/00 31-Oct-2000 6,603,640.56 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,800,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL 30-Ou-2000 -6,603,640.56 912795GC9 04/192001 DO 10/19/00 31.Oc1.2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 31-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,571.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 31-Oct-2000 -10.571A4 996085247 31-Oc1-2000 10,571.44 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,571.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Oct-2000 -10,571.44 996095247 31-0ct-2000 0.00 FC 31.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,785.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Oc1-2000 -29,785.13 996085247 31-Oct-2000 29,795.13 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,785.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Oct-2000 -29,795.13 996085247 31.Oct-2000 0.00 FC 31.Oc1-2000 0.00 07-Nov-2000 14:50:42 &x .fiw Wo kbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: l0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL IIOME LN MTG CORI'DIS 31.Oct-2000 -1,095,789.00 313397ALS MAT(11/11/2001 31.Oct-2000 1,085,788.00 B CI IASE SECt IRI'I'Ih:4.NEW PORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-I'IMC'O 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN hITG CORD DIS 31-Oct-2000 -1,083,788.00 313397ALS MAT01/112001 31-Oc1.2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 31.Oct-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Sep-2000 .2,025,625.00 OIN0806A7 8.00%10/01/2030 23-Oct-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 14-Scp-2000 -12,157,500.00 0IN0806A7 8.00%10/01/2030 23.Oct-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I5-Sep-2000 -5,820,312.50 OIN0606A9 6,000%10/152029 23.Oct-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 15-Sep-2000 -3,351,250.00 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152030 23.Oct-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE PENNER 23.Oc1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,00000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTO 15-Sep-2000 -10,532,500.00 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/152030 23.Oct-2000 0.00 PC BEAR ST'EARNS&CO INC,NY 23.0n-2000 0.00 07•Now2000 14:50:42 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 =&CONSOLIDATED SRARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200.000.00 1IELLER FINANCIAL.INC Nl'S 29-Scj-2000 -197,995.61 42333HKJO 5.75(5609/25/2001 DD IF)2519 02-On-2000 0.00 PC BEAR SMARNS&CO INC.NY 02-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID UPER-PIAICO 902.000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR N'1'S 06-Oct-2000 -896,678.20 98155KAF9 6.125%08/15/2001 DO 0811119 12-Oct-2000 996,678.20 B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 902.000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS 06-On-2000 -9,747.52 98155KAF9 6.125%09/152001 DO 08/11/9 12-Oct-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 902,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS 06-Oct-2000 ,905,425.72 98155KAF9 6.125%08/152001 DO 0811119 12-Oct-2000 0.00 PC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 12-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL It-Oa-2000 -448,219.20 345370AY6 9.000%09/152001 DO 09/199 16-Oct-2000 448,219.20 B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440,000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL I I-Oct.2000 -3,410.00 345370AY6 9.000%091152001 DO 0911519 16-Oct-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 440.000.00 FORD MTR CO DEL 11-Oct-2000 -451,629.20 345370AY6 9.000%09/152001 DO 091M 16-Oct-2000 0.00 PC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 16-Oct-2000 0.00 07-Nw 2000 I4:50:42 E.ec.f ve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS I I.Oct-2000 .99,404.00 98155KAF9 6.125%0 811 5/20 0 1 DO 09111/9 16.0c1.2000 99,404.00 B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS 1 I.Om-2000 -1,037.85 98155KAF9 6.125%08/15/2001 DO 08/11N 16.0n-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 WORLDCOM INC SR NTS II.Oct-2000 -100,441.85 98155KAF9 6.125%08/1512001 DO 0811119 16.Oc1-2000 0.00 FC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 16-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-W-2000 -Z035,000.00 OIN0806B5 8.000%11/152030 20-Nov-2000 2,035,000.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oct-2000 .5,873,046.88 011,10606137 6,000%11/152028 20-Nov-2000 5,873,046.88 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2000 -12,210,000.00 OIN0806115 9.000%11/152030 20-Nov-2000 12,210,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 16.Oct-2000 -3,372,031.25 OIN0626B3 6.500% 11/012029 20-Nov-2000 3,372,031.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 074ov-2000 14:50:42 ExccuOn Wwkbmh - Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 16-Oct-2000 -10,594,375.00 011,10626133 6.500%11/012029 20-Nov-2000 10,594,375.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 19-Oct-2000 -202.730.00 122014AD5 8.500% 10/012001 DD 10/17/9 24-Oct-2000 202.730.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 19-Oct-2000 -1,096.11 122014AD5 8.500%10/012001 DO 10117/9 24-Oct-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 BURLINGTON RES INC NT 19-Oct-2000 -203,816.11 122014AD5 8.500%10/012001 DO 1011719 24-Oc1-2000 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 24-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 20.Oct-2000 -29,443,671.00 3133MBY94 6.875%08/152003 DO 08/07/0 24-Oct-2000 29,443,671.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 20.Oct-2000 -427,911.46 3133MBY84 6.875%08/152003 DD 08/07/0 24-Oct-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,100,000,00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 20-Oct-2000 -29,871,582.46 3133MBY84 6.875%0 811 52 0 03 DD 09/07/0 24-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Oct-2000 0.00 PAY UPS 07WN 2000 14:50.41 6muli WWwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG 1'I'RM OPER-PIMI'U 5,494.00 US'I'REASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -5,494.00 9128273A8 3.6251.07/1921812DD07r15; 15-JulQ000 5,494.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,494.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I54u1-2000 -5.494.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/15/2002 DD 07/151 15-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 31-Oe1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,410.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -15,410.00 9128272M3 3375%01/152007 DO 01/1 S/ 15-Jul-2000 15,410.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,410.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -15,410.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 011151 15-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 31.Od-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,159.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Aug-2000 .1,159.10 79549BBGI 3.650%02/14/2002 DD 02/14/ 14-Aug-2000 1,139.10 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,159.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Aug-2000 -1,159,10 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DD 02/14/ 14-Aug-2000 0.00 PC 31-OU-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,418.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01.Oc1.2000 .12,419.56 3133Tl7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11101/9 01-Oc62000 12,418.56 FU 0.00 07-Nou-2000 14:50:42 Executive WWkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE Is PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,418.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Oct-2000 .12,418.56 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 111010 01.Oct-2000 0.00 FC 17-OU-2000 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENT'S LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .42,941.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Oct-2000 42,941.90 996085247 02-00-2000 .42,941.90 5 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .42,941.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Oct-2000 42,941.90 996085247 02.0ct-2000 0.00 FC 02-0M-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,126,464.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04.Oct-2000 126,464.52 996085247 04-Oct-2000 -126,464.52 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -126,464.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Oct-2000 126,464.52 996085247 04-Oc1-2000 0.00 FC 04-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,204.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 05.Od-2000 82,204.44 996085247 05.Oct-2000 -82,204.44 S 0.00 07-No 2000 14:50.42 Erecuthe Wwkbech Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,204.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Oct-2000 82,204.44 996095247 05-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 05-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-W-2000 13.60 996085247 06-Oct-2000 -13.60 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-OU-2000 13.60 996085247 06-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 06-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 425 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oa-2000 4.25 996085247 06-Oa-2000 4.25 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Oct-2000 4.25 996085247 06-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 06-0n-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO II-Oct-2000 900,000.00 99374D184 06.440%10/112000 DD 10/101 1I-Oct-2000 -900,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSFON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000,00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO I Wct-2000 161.00 99374DI84 06.440%1 011 12 0 0 0DD 10/10/ 11-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Now2000 14:50:42 F,enw ve Workbench - Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO II-Oct-2000 900,161.00 99374DI84 06.440%10/112000 DO 10/10f 11-Oct-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 11-Oa-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 YORKSHIRE BLG SOC DISC 11-0ct-2000 885,235.25 98719CM63 12/06/2000 1 I-Oct-2000 -885,235.25 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 YORKSHIRE BLG SOC DISC 11-0ct-2000 5,608.75 98719CM63 12/062000 1 I.Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 YORKSHIRE BLG SOC DISC 11-On-2000 990,844.00 98719CM63 12/062000 1I-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER I I-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-00-2000 900,000.00 99374E232 06.350% 10/122000DD 10/111 12.Oct-2000 -900,000.00 5 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12.Oct-2000 158.75 99374E232 06.350%10/12/2000DD 10/111 12-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-0a-2000 900,153.75 99374E232 06.350%10/122000 DO 10/11/ 12.Oct-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 12-Oct-2000 0.00 07-Naw2000 14:50:42 &ecutive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSACONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL I IOME LN MI'G CORI'DIS 12.Oct-2000 396.631.67 313396K93 RIM 10/17/31810 12-Oct-2000 -396,631.67 S I ISIK SECS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 I.IQl9O OPER-PIMCO -400.000.00 PHUIiIiAL IIO611'.I.N AI I'(i CORP DIS 12-Oct-2000 3,013.89 313396K93 MAT 10/17/2000 12-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17.Oct-2000 399,645.56 313396K93 MAT 10/17/2000 12.Oct-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 12.Oc1-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -61,930.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16.Oct-2000 61,930.42 996085247 16-Oct-2000 .61,930.42 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .61,930.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16.On-2000 61,930.42 996085247 16-00-2000 0.00 FC 16-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,265.83 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17.0a.2000 53,265.83 996087094 17-Oc1-2000 -53,265.83 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -115,000.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Oct-2000 I I5,000.84 996095247 17-Oct-2000 -115,000.84 S 0.00 07-Nw-2000 14:50:42 Eke tiw Wo4kbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Gcsc000l0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD.CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -115,000.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Oct-2000 115,000.84 996085247 17-00-2000 0.00 FC 17-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,186,084.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-00.2000 186,094.00 996085247 19-Oct-2000 ,186,094.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -196,084.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Oct-2000 186,084.00 996085247 19-00-2000 0.00 FC 19-Oct-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -102,941.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-00-2006 102,941.70 996085247 2"c1-2000 -102,941.70 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102,941.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Oo-2000 102,941.70 996085247 20-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,355,284.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Oct-2000 355,294.17 996085247 23-Oc1-20DO -355,284.17 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -355.294.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-00-2000 355,284.17 996083247 23-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 23-00-2000 O.OD 07-Nov-2000 14:50:42 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGV00/0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSDLONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 198,112.61 313396M75 MAT 101312000 23-Oct-2000 -198,112.61 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oa-2000 1,603.83 313396M75 MAI'10/312000 23.Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.0D FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-0ct-2000 199,716A4 313396M75 MAT 10/31/2000 23-Oa-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 23-Ott-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .4,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 23-Oct-2000 4,647,360.00 313384S34 MAT 12IM000 23-Oct-20D0 -4,647,360.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 23-0a-2000 15,933.00 313384S34 MAT 12/062000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 23-Oc1-2000 4,663,293.00 313384S34 MAT 12/0612000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 23-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oa-2000 9,391,010.58 313396S46 MAT 12/072000 23-Oct-2000 -9,391,010.58 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 074 2000 14.50.42 Ewcudw Ww bewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,500,000.00 FFDERAI,IIOMF I MW CORI'DIS 23-Oct-2000 33,108.17 113396S46 6IA'I'12/07/200I1 23-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPI:R-PIMC'O -9,500.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 9,424,119.75 3133%S46 MA 12/072000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 23-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 1,979,364.00 3133%T37 MAT 12/142000 23-Oct-2000 -1,979,364.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 2.176.00 313396T37 MAT 12/142000 23-Od-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 1,981,540.00 313396T37 MAT 12/142000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 23-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 23-Oct-2000 7,494,987.28 31358ST39 MAT 12/142000 23-Oct-2000 -7,494,887.28 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 23.Oct-2000 34,964.72 313588T39 MAT 12/142000 23.Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Nov-Z000 14:50:41 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Oc"00/0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .7,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 23.Oct-2000 7,529,952.00 31358ST39 MAT 12/142000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 23-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 BELL ATLNTIC FINL DISC 23-Oct-2000 2,960,439.23 07785AL19 11/01/2000 23-Oct-2000 -2,960,439.23 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 BELL ATLNTIC FINL DISC 23.Oct-2000 34,655.77 07795AL19 11/01/2000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,000,000.00 BELL ATLNTIC FINL DISC 23.Oct-2000 2,995,095.00 07785AL19 11/01/2000 23.Oct-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 2,370,560.00 313396Q55 MAT 1122/2000 23.Oct-2000 .2,370,560.00 S MORGAN/P SECS-FIXED[NCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Oct-2000 16,640.00 313396Q55 MAT 1122/2000 23.Oct-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23.Oct-2000 2,397,200.00 313396Q55 MAT 11222000 23-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN/P SECS-FIXED INCO 23-Oct-2000 0.00 074 2000 I4:50:42 Eucudw Wwkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -203,816.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Oct-2000 203,816.11 996085247 24-0et-2000 -203,816.11 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -203,816.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Oct-2000 203,816.11 996095247 24-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 24-Oct-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Oct-2000 493,653.33 313396R54 MAT 11/30/2000 24-Oct-2000 493,653.33 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Oct-2000 3,057.78 313396R54 MAT 11/30/2000 24-OU-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Oct-2000 496,711.11 313396R54 MAT 11/30/2000 24-Oct-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Oct-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,490.390.89 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 29-Sep-2000 2,515,994.79 78442GBA3 FLTO RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/ 04-Oct-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 04-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTRO06 29-Sep-2000 2,004,900.69 17120QE80 FLTG RT 09/09/2002 DO 04/08/ 04-Oct-2000 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 04-00-2000 0.00 07-Nov-2000 14:50:41 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 =&CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.USS LONG TERM OPEN-I'IMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2000 2,036,329.13 OIN0806A7 8.00%10/15/2030 23-Oc1-2000 -2,026,160.71 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 10,167.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Oct-2000 2,036,328.13 0IN0806A7 8.00%10/152030 23-W-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-0cb2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2000 12,217,968.75 OIN0806A7 8.009/o 10/15/2030 23-0ct-2000 -12,156,964.29 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 61,004.46 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMI'G 16-Oo-2000 12,217,968.75 OIN0806A7 8.00%101152030 23-0et-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2000 5,873,291.02 01N0606A9 6.000% 10/152030 23-Oc1-2000 .5,820,312.50 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 52,978.52 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2000 5,973,291.02 OIN0606A9 6.000%10/152030 23.Oct-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-0ct-2000 3,372,578.13 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/152030 23.Oct-2000 -3,351,250.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21,328.13 07-Now2000 14:50:42 &ecuttue Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COAIMIT TO PUR GNNIA SP M'TG 16-Oct-2000 3,372,578.13 OIN0626A5 6.50MI,10/152030 23-Oct-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERO.PENNER 23.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG IRR61 OPER-PIAIC0 -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TOPURGNMASFM'IG 16-Oct-2000 10,5%,093.75 OIN0626AS 6.5000/.10/152030 23-Oct-2000 -10,532,500.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 63,593.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 16.Oct-2000 10,596,093.75 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2030 23-0m-2000 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Oct-2000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,072.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Aug-2000 39.072.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Aug-2000 -39,115.2.3 PD 42.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39.072.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Aug-2000 39,072.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 15-Aug-2000 0.00 PC 16-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,055.65 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Sep-2000 4,055.65 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 121011 01-Scp-2000 0.00 PC 16-Oct-2000 0.00 07-No 2000 14:50:41 Executive Wo kb,Mh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000lo000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,069.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E•3 A 01-Sep-2000 -39,069.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 01-Sep-2000 39,111.73 PDC 42.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,024.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Sep-2000 42,024.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Sep-2000 -42,070.46 PD -45.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,200.55 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-2000 42,200.55 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01.Oct-2D00 .42,141.20 PD 59.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,200.55 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Oct-2000 42,200.55 3133T02D5 5.90D%06/15/2017 01.Oct-2000 0.00 PC 16-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -109,004.88 FHLMC GROUP#05.0476 01.0n-2000 109,004.88 3128DDQ55 7.0DD%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01.Oct-2000 -110,708.08 PD -1,703.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -109,004.88 FHLMC GROUP SG5.0476 01-Oct-2000 109,004.88 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02/011 01-Oct-2000 0.00 PC 16.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,051.68 GNMA 11 POOL 00090395 01-Oct-2000 4,051.68 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/01/ 01.Oct-2000 4,014.96 PD 36.72 07.No 2000 14:50:42 Ermtiw WmkbeM Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000I0000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,051.68 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01.Oct-2000 4,051.68 36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Oct-2000 0.00 PC 20.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,708.65 GNMA 11 POOL 40090023 01-Oct-2000 34,709.65 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/20/2026 DD 12/01/ 01-OM-2000 35,283.51 PD -574.86 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .34,709.65 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Oo-2000 34,708.65 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/20/2026 DO 12/01/ 01.Oct-2000 0.00 PC 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,942.29 GNMA 11 POOL 9080408X 01.0ct-2000 2Z942.29 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Oct-2000 .2Z709.28 PD 233.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2Z942.29 GNMA 11 POOL 8080408X 01-0ct-2000 22,942.29 36225CN28 6.500%0 5/2 01203 0 DD 05MIl 01-Oct-2000 0.00 PC 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -8,414.50 FHLMC GROUP#79-6064 01.Oet-2000 8,414.50 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 121011 01-Oct-2000 .8,209.40 PD 205.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,351.23 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 01.00-2000 39,351.23 36225CC20 VAR RT 06120/2 0 2 7 DO OWN 01.Oct-2000 -40,212.04 PD -860.81 07.Now2000 14:50.42 Eeeeudw Wwkbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .39,351.23 GNMA R POOL 8080088M 01-Oct-2000 39,351.23 36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 UD 06/00 01.Oc42000 0.00 PC 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,915.37 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 01.Oct-2000 1,915.37 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/2910 01.Oct-2000 -1,897.39 PD 27.98 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,915.37 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01.Oct-2000 1,915.37 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 01.Oc1-2000 0.00 PC 25.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -590.78 WMP/HUN'FOON PAIGE 8000.11150 01-Oct-2000 590.78 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 10/2119 01.Oc1.2000 -577.95 PD 12.83 LONG PERM OPER-PIMCO -26.549.26 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 I5-0m-2000 26,549.26 3935052Y7 6.290%1 011 5/20 1 3 DD 0826/9 15.0n-2000 -26,549.26 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,549.26 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15.Oct-2000 26,549.26 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 09126/9 15-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 16.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,039.43 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Oct-2000 3,039.43 31677EAA4 6,200%09/01/2001 DD 03/15/9 15.Oct-2000 .3,039.43 PD 0.00 07-No 2000 14:50:42 ExeeufN Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGoOol00o0 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,039.43 FIFTI I THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Oct-2000 3,038.43 31677EAA4 6.201L^609/01/20011)1)03/1519 1S-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 16-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG'ITRM OPER-PIbICtl -38,500.03 GNMA G3'D REMIC I 20000 FIJ 16.Oct-2000 38,500,03 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-0n-2000 -38,500.03 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,500.03 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16.Oct-2000 38,500.03 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Oct-2000 0.00 FC 16-00-2000 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05.Oct-2000 1,194,353.67 313396J53 MAT 10.5-2000 05-Oct-2000 -1,194,353.67 MT 05-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 12.Oct-2000 295,131.50 313588K46 MAT 10/122000 12.Oct-2000 -295,13L50 MT 12-Od-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12.Oct-2000 590,676.50 313396K44 MAT 10/122000 12.Oct-2000 -590,676.50 MT 12.Oct-2000 0.00 07-Nav-1000 14:50.42 Eu mm Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Oct-2000 6,104,408.06 36959HKCO 10/12/2000 12-Oct-2000 -6,104,408.06 MT 12-Oct-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -3,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME.LN MTG CORP DIS 17.Oct-2000 3,268,320.00 313396K93 MAT 10/17/2000 17-Oct-2000 -3,269.320.00 MT 17-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -90Q000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 18.OcI-2000 884,794.50 38142TK13 10/18/2000 18-On-2000 -984,794.50 MT I8-Ou-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-Oct-2000 1,180,189.33 31358SL37 MAT 10/19/2000 19.Oct-2000 -1,180,199.33 MT 19-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -11100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 31-Oct-2000 1,089,61936 3133%M75 MAT 10/31/2000 3I-Oct-2000 -1,089,619.36 MT 31-Oct-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,000.00 MORGAN I P&CO MTN SR 00043 02.Oct-2000 150,W0.00 61687YBUO 6.125%10/02/2000 DO 10/02/9 02-Oct-2000 -149,625.00 MT 02-OG-2000 375.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900.000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00538 10.Oct-2000 900,000.00 345402YKI 7.020%10/10/2000 DO 10110/9 10.Oct-2000 -905,913.00 MT 10-Oct-2000 -5,913.00 07-Nov-2000 14:50:42 Esecwive W �xh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000 -31-OCT-2000 00DCONSOL/D4TED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,708.65 GNMA II POOL#0080023 20-Oct-2000 7,551.42 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/011 01.Oct-2000 0.00 IT 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,351.23 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 20-Oct-2000 10,788.10 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 06/01/9 01-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 20-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,051.69 CNMA 11 POOL N0080395 20.Oct-2000 6,696.90 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/011 01-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 20.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,942.29 GNMA 11 POOL 8080408X 20.Oct-2000 53,713.61 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 20-Get-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 8TR006 20.Oc14000 7,991.04 17120QESO FLTO RT 09M002 DO 04/08/ 20-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 20.Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24.Oct-2000 137,864.56 682680AJ2 FLTG RT 04242002 DO 0424/ 24.Oct-2000 0.00 IT 24.Oct-2000 0A0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI 1 A6 25.Oct-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500°k09252018 25-Sep-2000 0.00 IT 25.Oct-2000 0.00 07-Nw-2000 /4:50:42 Etecwi. Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGF. 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGM10000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.915.37 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FI1A#95 25-00-2000 8,101.12 39810AAE4 7.4301%0"12003 DO 0229/0 01-00-2000 0.00 IT 25-Oct-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Oa-2000 132.000.00 9128274T6 04.000%10/3120DO DO 1013It 30A0-2000 0.00 IT 30-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,00QD00.00 HELLER FINL MTN MTR 00246 30-Oa-2000 54,617.92 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 0427/ 28-00-2000 0.00 IT 30-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 30-Oc1-2000 90,899.31 79548EEE8 FLTG FIT 04282003 DO 04281 28-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 30-Oct-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 8TR 00311 30-Oct-2000 30,350.90 61745ENY3 FLTG FIT 01282002 DO 0127/ 28-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 30.0a-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 31-Oct-2000 -1,214.87 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-0tt-2000 0.00 CW 31-Oa-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN 8TR 00004 31.Oct-2000 31,0OD.00 73317PADI 6.200%04/302001 DO 0421/9 30-Oct-2000 0.00 IT 31-Oct-2000 0.00 07-No 2000 14.50.42 Executive Workhexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-OCT-2000-31-OCT-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 31.Oct-2000 10,390.64 313396M75 MAT 10/312000 31-Oc1-2000 0.00 IT 31-Oc1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 31-Oct-2000 1,159.10 79549BBGI 3.650%02/14/2002 DO 021141 0.00 CD 3I-OU-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Oc1.2000 15,410.00 9128272M3 3.375%0 1/1 512 0 0 7 DO 011151 0.00 CD 31-0tt-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Oct-2000 5,494.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 0.00 CD 31-Oa-2000 0.00 07-Nw-2000 /4:50:42 E'ec.&v Workbench FAHR COMMITTEE =812 '.Ai rqr. u/oe/axa tt/Is/zaao AGENDA REPORT Rom MMW IMMNumb FAIR00084 14E) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 2000-01 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 2000. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended September 30, 2000. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District through the first quarter of the 2000-01 fiscal year. Contained within the First Quarter Financial Report and Operational Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 2000-01 Approved Budget and Strategic Goals Workplan. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 23.66 percent, or $10,976,000 of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of $46.0 million has been expended. Net costs have decreased 8.60 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily due to the unexpected cost of the Huntington Beach closure investigation in the first quarter of 1999-00 totaling $750,800. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1999 is $473.76 based on flows of 251.8 million gallons per day. This is $40.64, or 7.9 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of $514.40. This shortfall is due to expenditures being lower than budget by 4.56 percent compounded by the overage in flows, 2.79 percent above the budgeted amount of 245 million gallons per day. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A XW.y.dOtLOeMe9vN Ayende Reµxh� MAOende flepwb%'IP mtelel eee R..ved: ©mse Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. 2000-01 Financial and Operational Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000. HMp Mom A�rd�eewmMt m11(l ac evnee4 . Page 2 FAHRCOMMMEE Itleeen9Dae I To8d.ofMr. 11/e6/0e 11/15/00 AGENDA REPORT 1hm Numdr 1em NumG FMROO-91 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2000 THROUGH September 30, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Terre Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) HWq.MtlWe"4e WApn RermY\ B MApmtle Aep MW tA(e)dec Re,.,e,., wares Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reoorts The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the Districts portfolios, as of June 30, 2000 and September 30, 2000. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period July 1 through September 30, 2000. PoMollo Performance summary Quarter Ended September W,2000 Liquid Operating Monies Long-Term Operating Moral"(%) Trial Rale Trial Rate of dRelum earnhmarko Return 16.1 Drava 1.7 1. 2.3 3.3 2.9 4.3 9 Months 1. 4. 6.0 12 Months 8.4 5.6 6.7 Sklae Inception W Sept.95 5. 5.2 64 Market Value per PIMCO 30 Jun 00 S33.9M mom Average Quality 'A a• urrent Yield(%) 6.3 ESOmeted Yield to Maludty(%) 6.7 6.9 Quarterly Deposes(Wilhdr.1s) .0M $(I4.3)M EaOmatad Annual Income $2.1M S22.2M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt. 15 Year Bond Index Market Raceo Intermediate maturity Treasuries rallied in the third quarter as yields on two, five, and 10-year notes fell as much as 39 basis points. With yields on 30-year Treasuries remaining flat, the 10/30-year portion of the yield curve reverted to a positive slope for the first time since mid- January. The disinversion of the long end of the yield curve came amid shifting market sentiment about the economy, Federal Reserve policy and the U.S. budget surplus, including: • Oil prices at the highest levels in a decade raised concern about the potential for accelerating inflation, causing 30-year bonds to lose their luster relative to less inflation- sensitive shorter-maturity debt. H\rTebVp•r M"da R6o,b13 (Z8-N Apendsft M(104%m 141.14c R•,. IMSe Page 2 Inflation jitters were accompanied by indications that growth was slowing due to disappointing corporate earnings, reduced manufacturing activity, an uptick in unemployment and slower retail sales. • Signs of cooling economy allowed the Federal Reserve to leave the federal funds rate unchanged during the quarter. Optimism grew that the Fed's tightening cycle was over and its next move might be to ease. Potential for a less restrictive Fed boosted demand for two, five and 10.year notes. • For much of this year investors scrambled to buy long term Treasuries because of concern that buybacks financed by the federal budget surplus would create a dearth of high quality 30.year bonds. Support for the 30-year bond eroded during the third quarter, however, as tax cut and spending plans of the major presidential candidates threatened to consume the surplus. Performance results of the Long-Tenn Portfolio includes: • Under performed its benchmark for the quarter but outperformed year to date. • Below-benchmark duration had a slightly negative impact on returns as intermediate rates fell. • A broader-than-index maturity structure was negative as intermediate maturities similar to the index outperformed. • A mortgage emphasis added to returns due to relatively high yields and low market volatility. • Corporate holdings added to returns as relatively high yield premiums attracted investor demand. Performance results of the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes: • Outperformed its index for the quarter and year-to-date. • Near-benchmark duration was neutral for performance. • Investment-grade corporate holdings added to performance as credit premiums narrowed. • Use of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes enhanced returns for the quarter. Market Outlook Forecasts from PIMCO report that Global growth will moderate in response to recent monetary tightening by central banks in the U.S., Europe and Japan and the highest oil prices in a decade. Inflation will creep higher as increased energy prices filter through economies worldwide. Kl .ftlxw N�AY ft R%o,LL4U M•gentle RgYll'1110DAem 1418).E¢ R- —, � Page 3 Signs of a slowdown are apparent in the U.S.following 175 basis points of Federal Reserve rate increases since the middle of last year. Slower employment growth and reduced purchasing power due to raising oil prices will restrain previously exuberant consumers. The Fed's recent tightening cycle is likely over now that economic growth is cooling. Despite slower growth, the Fed will refrain from easing to avoid igniting inflation in equity and housing markets. High levels of investment in information technology will continue to buttress the U.S. economy, through this spending may prove vulnerable to slower growth. U.S. labor markets will remain tight, producing demands for higher nominal wages. Productivity growth will likely lag wage increases this late in the economic cycle, so upward pressure is expected on unit labor costs. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Tenn Portfolio includes: • Target duration near the benchmark because intermediate rates are unlikely to fall further with the Fed on hold. • Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the yield curve. • Continue to emphasis mortgages because of superior credit quality and relatively high yields; retain focus on"full faith and credit" GNMA's. • Hold upper tier, shorintermediate corporate issues to take advantage of relatively high yields. • Continue to hold real return bonds as moderating growth and a neutral Fed put downward pressure on real yields. • Hold asset-backed securities, especially AAA/AA issues, which will benefit from Treasury scarcity and strong demand for high quality short-term holdings. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio includes: • Target duration slightly above the benchmark to capture incremental yield from mortgage and high quality corporate issues. • Take advantage of historically wide credit premiums on select short-maturity, higher-rated corporate issues. • Continue to invest in high quality commercial paper as a means to add value and liquidity to the portfolio. • Hold agency discount notes, which have a yield premium over Treasury bills. Portfolio Market Values On August 31, 2000, the District received the sum of$32.67 million from the proceeds of the 2000 Refunding Certificates of Participation debt and deposited in the District's Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio for investment. This deposit was more than H:Y ,fttpeM•8•N�ReryM\2O.IJBmN•perW pepem111WJent�le)Jx Re , p Page 4 offset by the withdrawal of$47.0 million during the quarter to meet the District's dry period operating and capital requirements. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Lag-Term Quarter OpaaOng Op-ming Ending M.Wec l3M) Monies ISM) 30 Sept.99 10.3 271.1 31 Den.99 19.9 2829 31 We 00 19.9 351A 30 June 00 33.3 3582 30 Sent.00 33.9 3520 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Charcteristics Charts (2) 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph Hr^9.�M/ ft ReprN�YCi %-M Ag Re{sb111a 14(e).hc Reiset., a Page 5 Prepared by Finance, 1110212000, 8:44 AM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 30 Sep 99 31 Dec 99 31 Mar 00 30 Jun 00 30 Sep 00 OLiquid Operating Monies 0Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggiT-inance\investmgmtprogram LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District SummaryJolormalion (IM31112000 WJID12NQ 60 Qualil o13w3tn000 ■aw2maoo Total Market Value(MM) $358.2 $352.0 50 191B Quarterly Contributions(MM) $0.0 .$14.3 K 40 Estimated Annual Income(MM) S22.6 $22.2 Estimated Duration(yrs)t 2.2 2.2 J0 23 1 2231 Estimated Yield to Maturity 1%) 6.9 % 6.9% o. 20 Average Maturity(yrs) 3.2 3.7 10 6 7 Average Quality____ AAa Ma p 0 0 I 0 0 o n 00 0 0 ATOM gekne AM AA A BM BA B 80.8 AM 70 .52Gt OBh/3n20W 60 ■n9noa0a0 fi0 MattoilY ■o9nn¢0o6ldl1nElano00 � so 'e so <: 40 E 40 70 26 25 30 26 20 2p i I$ IJ In IG p 0 0 4 n I I 10 22 10 B 2 2 4 cast Mtg Cory Non US$ Emerging Other Net Cad, 01 nevelaP Markela Equal O l yrs 1 J yrs 3 5 yrs s l o yrs 10 20 yrs 20,its Coupon 06/30/2000 /1913012000 Dxrilmllses 06/90120➢0 09/3n/xno0 > 12% 0 0 . Gross FuturesG 0.0% . 0.0% 8. 12% 1 4 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 7-8% 12 13 Mortgage Backed' 0.0 0.0 6-7% 71 67 Other/ 0.0 0.0 5-6% 5 '5 <5% 11 11 Average Coupon 6.2 % 6.3% 1 Measure ola LorM Ponlollo's foralwnd'sl Pane senslllvllywtlmnges in Oneren rain. Ilbawelghted mawrlty alPmem value of all Principaliandl lmemt PaY^Ienu. 2 ImdrMes quality rating of cash equlwlnua backing IuwreLwrward commllmnb. 3 Other includes VankeMuro brows,convenibin and permed slocke'Nel Cash Equivalent-eyub cash equlvalmu less secret rent to back Inures,lmwards and unullled trade. 1 MonRa6eLacked seeurlter are olegorlied by welgMed avenge Ole. 5 haLxles all govenvuem Inures anJ Eurodollar Inures wmecu. One to The llueemmlh mamdly of Eurodollar futures contracts,the nominal value has been divided by Iwr. G Samurilies delennbhad by PIMCO to have poreotally less stable duration charaaerlwcs,such as: 10 as PO$GIPS,SuPptn-da3 CMOs,and Inverse Floaters. 7 Category Includes securhin which thrive their valre Iran underlying Interest rates,such as credit sneers,Swaps and non-U.S.derivalves. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY ` LIQUID OPERATING MONIES PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS Orange County Sanitation District Summary Information ow enotill u9nn/2o0n '� Quality' Total Market Value(MM) $33.3 $33.9 Quarterly Contributions(MM) $13.0 $0.0 80 Estimated Annual Income(MM) S2.1 $2.1 5 60 53 sl Estimated Duration (yrs)' 0.3 0.2 y Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 6.6% 6J% a 40 Average Maturity fyr9 0.3 0(2 7 20 22 1920 Avers e QualityAA+ M 0t 0 ° 3 0 o " " o a o 0 0 o Al/PI MA M A Below BM BA B Below AM 9 60 140 120 SBL11u' now3wOW 120 MaluriW 0o6ne2000 120 ■09nW1000 l00100 100 e IW de gl 60 W i 60 40 ' iU 31 20 20 10 ➢ 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 55 6 < 2 0 a 0 Co. His Cory Non US$ brarging Other Nel Castor 0.3. 3-6 mo 69 mo Al2. 15yrs Svyn Develop Matke's M.Mkls, CONpDn 06130/200n ➢9/30/2MIo PeliyaliYEg o6Y30/20M o4/3022000 > 12% 0 '`0 Gross Futures 0.0 % . 0.0% 0- 12% 10 `it Options Premiums 00 0.0 7-8% 6 6 Mortgage Backed 0.0 0.0 6-7% 63 ':61. Others f' 0.0 0.0 5-6% 1 ". 1 .5% 20 21 Avers a Cou n 6.4% 6.3% I Measure of a both pololio's Im a bond's)price sensitivity to claws In Interesr Fades. It a welghk l downy at present value of all principal and interest payrnmLL 2 Includes quality rating of cash equivalents backing fukreounreaN comMOmnts. 3 otter Iucludes vankeNEurO bonds,mnveNbles a preferred ricks;Net Cash/Money Mines Wetter,L6116,SI IF,CP,BAs and CDs,less ansounuo back bond fuWres,forwards and umenled vales. 4 Mongap-backed securities are categorized by weighled average life. 5 Securities demmlrcd by Irl to hive porenllally Ins stable duration chanclerislin,such arc 10 6 M Sal,,Suyporl lass(DMOs,and Inverse Fleaka 4 Category Includes securities M)Ich derive Weir value from ontlelybng Intel.aus ouch as credo seroedy maps aM non U.S.derlwliwes. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Prepared by Finance, 10/31/2000, 1:45 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 7.00 6.75 6.50 6.25 6.00 5.75 0 w 5.50 6.25 5.00 4.76 4.50 4.25 4.00 E E >1s s �31-Mar-00 —6 30Jun-00 t29-Sep-00 G:Xexcel.dlaVin12220%eggi Finance%HisloricelTREASURYyleldcurve FAHR COMMITTEE neeeny oxe Toad W. uioaroo 11JIstoo AGENDA REPORT 11xm Numbe Rem Number FAHR 85 14rn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources & Employee Development Originator: Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: COMPENSATION STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-29, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for: 1. Create Limited Term Contract Engineer classification at pay range El ($67,122-$94,929). 2. Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068 - $70,847). 3. Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Sr Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99/00 budget at a proposed cost of $5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. SUMMARY From time to time, adjustments need to be made to a classification structure. As new duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the organization, new classifications must be added or job descriptions modified. Staff has identified three adjustments that need to be made to the classification structure. 1. A Limited Term Contact Engineer classification be created at pay range E13 ($67,122 - $94,929). Currently the District is utilizing temporary employees to work on long-term engineering projects. By creating this classification, the District will achieve overall cost savings as the rate of pay for the incumbents in this classification will be lower than the current billing rates being paid to the temporary agencies. Additionally, the District is at legal risk by using temporary employees on a long-term basis. The classification was slotted at the same range as the Sr Engineer classification. Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 1. 2. An Engineering Contracts Administrator classification be created at pay range E7 ($50,068 - $70,847). The District commissioned a study to review the existing construction contract administration workflow processes and to determine H�aabys�Mro e•w^< a MAw n�ni =14M.a erg,,,, v Page 1 whether a need existed for a construction contract administrator position. The study found that a need existed and recommended that the classification be titled Engineering Contracts Administrator. Survey data for this classification at the nine comparison agencies and local city governments has an average midpoint of $59,904. The midpoint or market reference point of pay range E7 is $60,458. Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 2. 3. For Division 420, Collection Facilities Maintenance, the FY99/00 budget showed approval for Lead Mechanic, Sr Mechanic, Mechanic and Maintenance Worker positions totaling 13. Inadvertently, these classifications were not carried over for the FY00101 budge(. The approved positions reverted back to the classifications of Lead Collection Facilities Worker, Sr Collection Facilities Worker, Collection Facilities Worker I and ll. It is recommended that the current FY00/01 budget be modified to reflect the FY99/00 changes. Cost for remaining three quarters of FY00/01 is $5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. It is recommended that these two classifications be combined because the job duties and responsibilities are identical. Both positions have a mandatory qualification for possessing a minimum of a"Class B° driver's license with an airbrake and tanker certificate. This combined classification will utilize the revised Maintenance Worker job description. Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 3, PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A H vyan�oema,mam�e•nm Fepanxmo so.,e noenm aepoa,,,oa, lA as xa,,.e Page 2 9 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Limited Term Contract Engineer classification description. 2. Engineering Contracts Administrator classification description. 3. Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule. N wnem�mevmore/.pe..ev aeoo,nwmeoan new Anwb�>>aaial�ex Page 3 No. 9991 e Date: 10/18/00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Revised: Approved: Title: LIMITED TERM CONTRACT ENGINEER Page: 1 of 3 DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: Incumbents possess registration in their field of expertise. Incumbents are responsible for project management activities and receive administrative direction from supervisor. Incumbents may act as senior advisers to engineering staff. Work is reviewed at the completion of projects by supervisor to determine if desired overall results and objectives have been achieved. Incumbents may oversee activities of less experienced engineers. EXAMPLE OF DUTIES: Duties and responsibilities vary by department and may include the following: Operations and Maintenance: Evaluates the design of complex to highly complex engineering drawings, systems and processes for the improvement of wastewater treatment facilities and oversees the design of non-complex engineering plans. Inspects, diagnoses and develops corrective action plans to complex and highly complex plant and sewer system operation and maintenance problems. Works with Engineering department to review wastewater facility plans and specifications and to provide input on functional aspects of proposed facilities. Oversees the bid and proposal process and prepares purchase recommendations for wastewater treatment facility and collection system improvement projects and equipment. Prepares emergency preparedness plans and training procedures. Tracks District's conformity to regulatory requirements for permit compliance by reviewing wastewater treatment processes and the treatment facilities' removal efficiencies and discharge data. Reviews plant process trends, takes or directs corrective action and coordinates plant operators and operation activities to optimize plant process. Oversees and provides review of utilities, chemicals, equipment budget preparation and reports. Analyzes and performs optimization studies of various chemicals, unit processes, odor control and utilities throughout the treatment plant. Represents the District with regulatory agencies, public, contractors and consultants. Prepares memos and reports regarding wastewater treatment management and conducts inspections of wastewater treatment facilities and construction sites. Oversees the start-up of complex facilities. Technical Services: Issues and renews industrial wastewater discharge permits to industrial facilities by performing evaluations of the permit applications and design drawings of industrial waste management practices, finalizing permit requirements and ensuring compliance. Implements permittees' industrial sampling and monitoring programs by evaluating sampling and monitoring data to determine compliance, issuing notices of violations, scheduling requirements and ensuring compliance. Undertakes enforcement actions against non-compliant industries by performing evaluations of the industries' compliance histories, determining the level of enforcement action to be taken, performing evaluations of the permittees' corrective response plans and waste management proposals, preparing and finalizing correspondences and tracking compliance. Conducts technical facility inspections to assess and verify permit application information and design drawings and assess the cause of violations. Interfaces with industrial permittees and the public, No. 9991 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Date: 10/18/00 Revised: Approved: Title: LIMITED TERM CONTRACT ENGINEER Page: 2 of 3 Technical Services (cont.): both in person and by telephone, by responding to permittees' requests regarding regulatory permit and enforcement issues. Prepares compliance agreements, administrative orders, administrative complaints and staff reports. Plans and develops source control policy, procedures and tasks, implements new regulatory requirements and participates in studies conducted by the EPA and other regulatory agencies. Project manager for air quality projects, prepares scope of services, selects consulting engineers, establishes schedule and performance criteria, tracks progress, manages budget and prepares reports. Manages SCAQMD permits by updating permit index, paying permit fees, establishing permit conditions on new permits, communicating permit compliance requirements to operations and maintenance departments, developing auditing programs and auditing compliance activities. Evaluates and designs more complex plans for air quality control equipment. Develops and manages air quality database system and evaluates and selects control technologies to achieve air quality compliance requirements. Develops conformity documents for the District's facilities, assists in the development of air quality policies and tracks new legislative and regulatory developments related to air quality compliance. Oversees research for air pollution control and implementation and develops and manages emission modeling systems and testing program. Represents the District with regulatory agencies, public, contractors and consultants. Prepares memos and reports regarding air quality management. Engineering: Develops the scope of work for new, complex to highly complex wastewater treatment facility projects and reviews consultant proposals to ensure that drawings and detailed specifications are prepared according to project requirements. Prepares engineering and construction budgets and requests for proposals. Provides technical assistance to engineers and engineering aides. Processes easements, grant deeds, agreements and permits during the preparation of contract bid documents for the construction of wastewater treatment facilities. Performs utility searches and resolves complex to highly complex utility location conflicts during the construction of facilities. Interprets more complex facility construction contract documents, prepares progress payments to the contractor and reviews submittals for material and equipment conformance to design specifications and plans. Performs analysis of change orders to verify that they are requirements, negotiates fair and reasonable costs for change orders and prepares change order reports and documents for consideration by the Board of Directors. Prepares complex to highly complex engineering plan clarifications and changes as response to contractor's request for information during construction of facility and verifies that equipment meets design specifications and regulatory requirements. Performs more complex power system studies of electrical equipment to determine how modifications affect the systems and to plan future growth. Represents the District with regulatory agencies, public, contractors and consultants. Prepares memos and reports regarding wastewater treatment facilities management and conducts inspections of wastewater treatment facilities and construction sites. No. 9991 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Date: 10/18/00 Revised: Approved: Title: LIMITED TERM CONTRACT ENGINEER Page: 3 of 3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Bachelor of Sciences degree in Engineering from an accredited college or university, or equivalent experience, and four to six years of experience working on increasingly difficult projects which require the use of engineering principles, materials, practices and processes. Prefer at least two of those years at the registered engineer level. LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED: Possession of professional engineering registration from the state of California. Possession of a valid California class C driver's license. No. 1812 Date: 10/27/99 �� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT a � CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Revised: 10/20/00 f Approved: Title: ENGINEERING CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR Page: 1 of 2 DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS Under general direction, manages Public Works projects in coordination with Engineering staff, legal counsel and outside contractors. Participates in the development and fulfillment of contact requirements in accordance with District's policies and local, state and federal regulations. The work requires advanced knowledge of the concepts, practices and procedures of contract administration. The work is reviewed by the Contracts and Purchasing Supervisor at critical points of assigned projects for soundness of technical analysis and to determine if desired overall objectives and deadlines have been achieved. EXAMPLE OF DUTIES Performs activities concerned with contracts, service agreements, grants, proposals and bids for purchase or sale of equipment, materials, products or services in a multi-department organization participating in engineering, public works construction, maintenance, research and testing, quality control, computerization/automation, chemical procurement, and specialized professional services. Reviews and/or prepares bids, contract stipulations, process specifications, liability and insurance requirements, bonds, and faithful performance warranties and assures conformity and compliance with District's policies, procedures, and service provision expectations. Reviews, approves and administers contract content including material, equipment, and/or service costs, performance requirements, compliance with insurance and bonding requirements, liquidated changes and delivery schedules to ensure completeness and accuracy. Coordinates, approves and administers contract change orders, amendments, addendums, extensions, stop notices and releases and close-out agreements. Advises departments of contractual rights and obligations under approved terms and conditions and resolves dispute resolutions of parties. Negotiates contracts with vendors, direct major contract purchases, and interface with service providers to expedite timely completion of contract agreements. Maintains comprehensive contractual records and periodically monitors progress of all goods and service agreements, from inception through completion, to enforce milestones, deliverables and post-contract warranties. Formalizes contract and purchasing process through development of Standard Operating Procedures No. 1812 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Date: 10/27/99 r Revised: 10/20/00 Approved: Title: Engineering Contracts Administrator Page: 2 of 2 manual. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor's degree in related field and four years of related experience. A contract management certificate is desirable. Understanding of engineering/construction and public works contract administration, contract administration principles and knowledge of legal requirements for public works and capital projects. Experience in soliciting bids and proposals. Strong verbal and written communication skills. Excellent computer skills including recent use of MS Office programs and preferably JDEdwards FIS experience. LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED None Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group ' Professional Pay Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Medmum Maximum Maximum iClassiflcadons FLBA SfaWe E144 33.834 6,865 $70,376 47.884 8,300 1 $99,599 1Chief Soienikl i Exempt E13 32.270 6.593 $67,122 - 45.639 7,911 $94,929 (Assistant to the General Manager—T Exempt _ E13 32.270 6,593 $67,122 45.639 F 7,911 _394,929�.SeUor Enginear i—Exempt E73 32270 .' .5.593 " $67122 45399 7.9f :_r. $84�'2,9 ._ L<97 ed7Bmf160hai L-6ai-'ear- ...',Emnlpt -E72 30.743 -- 5.329 $63.945 43.493 7,539 $90.465 1Senior Scientist --Exempt E72 30743 5,329 - S63,995 43.493 7,539 $90,485 Senior Regulatory Specialist _i Exempt : E71 29247 5,089 $60,834 41.377 7,172 S116,084 _,Erginear Exempt E77 29.247 5,069 $60,834 41.377 '. 7,472 $88,0H9 iR5lrelegie lmdemeMatlon Lentler _______ ._ _ .__._.___.__ or E70 27.812 4,821 $57,849 38.39E 8,829 $81,941 '.Secretary to the 6oam of Directors i Ex Mot E9 26.542_ /,607 555,207 37.575 8,573 576,156 ;Pencipal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 - 25.542 4.607 $55,20] 37.575 8,57& 578,158IPrinUpal Engineering AasoUare - '' - Exempt _ E9 26.U2 /,601 $55,207 37.575 8,575 378.158 iProJeU SPedalist Exempt E9 28.542 4,601 555,207 37.575 6,513 1011.156 IRegulatory Specialist Exempt f E9 26.542 4,801 $55207 3Z575 6,513 $78,156 '.Scientist Exemp[ _--E9 _26__542 4,601 $55207 37.575 _ 6,513 _ $78_,156 Principal A_c_countaM j Exempt .. _ E9 26592 4,801 $55,207 37.575 8,513 $78,156 :Principal Financial Analyst ! Exempt 8,781 a25242 4,375 $52,503 35.717 """'_. Engineer ill - ----�— -Exempt - $74,291 Associate En _ EB 25242 4,375 $52.503 35.717 8,791 574,291 Prhxipal EnVironmeMel Specialist EB__ 25.242 - 4,376 $52.503 35.717 8,191 $74,291 .Safety 8 Emergency Response Specialist, —Fxampt---' E7 24.071 4,172 $50.068 34.681 5.904 SM,847 ?ProgrammerAnalyst om>nld L7 24071 4,172 $50.068 34.081 5904 579847 iComputer Hardware Specialist ___:___Exempt '—Exempt_ _._. T4.077 4,172 55D.068 34.061­ 5,904 570,BQJ'.Telecemmunicetions Specialist ., t7 24.077 4,172 65D.068 34.061 5,904 570,897 (Maintenance Planner Exempt _._ ._. _____ . .. _. _ _7 __- __-._..-_ E7 20.071 4,772 550.068 34.067 5,904 $70,847 Contreds Atlmmislrelor Exempt 4,172 $60.068 34.081 5,1116s' 570.847,_.. FspbleBrMg'!gnbad1-1 sAdml tiababF _ -.-.E --Pt 63 22i.908 3,970 547,644 90 32.399 5,618 $67,3 Principal Laboratory&Research Analyst Exempt ._ __ _ _ EB 22.908 3,970 $47,W4 32.399 5,61E. - $87,390 !Senior Adminhtretive Analyst Exempt. E6 21828 3,783 $45.]98 30.872 5,351 584214 !AssodeteE mean ll Exempt __ __ _. . . .__. _ __. �__.__—__. _._....i E6 21.828 3,783 545.398 30.872 S,357 E84,214 ,Senbr Accountant Fxemd _ _ ...__ ._.__. _ ______y E5 21.828 3,783 S45.398 30A72 5,351 584,214 (Senior Financ d Analyst Exempt E5 21.82E 3,783 $45.398 30.872 - 5.351 - $84,214 Senor Environmental Specialist - Exempt E4 20.790-- - 3,604 $43.243 29.443 � 5.103 $81,241 Safety Rapre6entatwe Exempt E4 E4 - 2D.790 3,604 547.247 29.443 5,103 581,247 ;Program mer � ExenNt ' _H.._ 20790 3,604 $43,243 29.443 5,103 581247 Senior Buyer fxerry4 i . _ _ ___ _ __ ngln E3 79.777 __3,428 541,13E 26.610 �i 4,855 S58,Z87 IAsrodala Enghreer I Exempt --- _—._.._.__ _._ _ _i .. _. E2 78.871 3,271 $J9.252 26.677 4,824 555,488 Contracts Specialist FxarrPt _ _ _ _ ._..__ E7 77.92E 3,167 537.286 25.438 4,459 $52,917 !Accountant Exerrlpl .. E7 7792E 3,707 537.28E 25.438 _ 4,409 $52911 iBuyer Exempt ' E7 7792E 8,107 837.28E 25.438 4,408 E5291/ ,Flnandel Analyst J-- Exempt _-_- _ ..._.__ _ . ._i E7 17.925 3,7D7 537.286 25.438 _ 4,409 $52,977_ fmanagenmM _____Analyst Exempt __ 09/26/00 i Orange County Sanitation District Classl0catlons By Employee Group Operations and Maintenance(501) Pay I Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Maximum Classifications FLEA Sralw 2016 _� 23.415 4,059 48,703 29.159 5,054 60.01 i Load Electrical Technician Non-Exempt _ _._. .. .___.__. ___�..._.. _. ____ ___. 2015 � 23.415 4,059 � 46,703 29.159 5,054 80,851 ilbed Instrumentation Tachnkbn _ Non-Exempt ! 2015 : 23.415_ 4.O5B _ 48,703 29.159 5,054 80,857 i Lead Pump Power Operator Non•Ezempl ' ZOt/ 22174 3843 - 46122 27.008 4786 67420 Electrical Technician ll Non-Exempt ' 2011 22.774 3,843 40122 - 27.808 4,785 67,420 Insimmanlalbn TechMdan ll _ Non-Exempt �.___ .. _ �._.._... . ._ .___ 2013 21421 3713 i A4558 28.876 4824 55484 Lead Mechanic .Non-Exempt � 2019 21421 3713 44356 26.875 4024 55494 Pump Power Opanlor Non Exempt 1 2013 27.421 9,713 ! A4 358 28.676 4,824 55,ae4 Lead Plant Operator Non Exempt ..___ ..__ . _...._ ._ _____. �__.._ _... .._.. 2012 20705 3589 43088 26.700 4,469 53,822 Lead Cdlection FactllSu Worker Non Exempt .. . _ _. . __- 2012 20.705 3589 43088 25.780 - 4489 53,622 !Lead Worker _ Nan-Ezema_t 2012 20705 3589 -- 43086 25.780 4469 53622 IMach!nisl Non-Exempt i 2011 19463 3374 40483 24.239 4,201 50417 !9enior Machank Non•Exempt _. _ 4. _. _._- ..._ 2077 19.483 3,37440,483 24.239 4,201 504'17 iWNOer Non•Ezempt J 2010 19832 326 40216 24A72 f.0 50070 Equipment tOpeator Non-Exempt 1... . . _ . _. ._ 2009 78.606 - 3.280 � 39,716 23.415 4,068 48,703 �.BuiMer Non•Fxempt 2009 18.808 3,280 39.116 23.415 4,O50 48,703 IEbctdcel Technician Non-Exempt ! _ 2009 18808 _ 3200 39118 23.475 4,069 48703 Instrumentation T_achnidenl _ Non-Exempt 2000 18087 3239 _ �- - perator Non�.zampl I_ 38869 23.260 4`092 483Bt PlallO 2007 i7057 2982 _ 35547 21.278 3,888 44258 tElBowcal Maintenance WOMu i Non-Exempt 2007 17 067 2.952 35.541 21.278 3,888 44,258 Inatmma __ _ Mainenance__ 'e Non-Exam 20D7 17.007 2.982 35.547 21.276 3,888 _ 44,258 PaMler ��--I�-N'orvEzempt _2007 _ 17.087 2982 � 35.541 21.278 3,888 M,156 Senior Mainenance Worker Non•Exempt i 2007 Mill 2.882 35.5n 21.77fi- -- 3,B88 44.20 Senior Collection Facilities Worker -Non-Exempt 2606 16633 2883 34597 20.705 _ 3,589 _ 43,088 Mechanic Non-Exempt_1 _90Y0� 40.67i . . 7,89i ' aaraa6 _ 40,303 � 7.abi 40,aL4 ICaMaatloniadOgas4lbdrx Y .� 6100a.fixxamPl I 2005 15.523 2.891 32,286 19.332 3,351 40,271 IMehderwnca Worker i NOREzampl ! 2.85 ... . 37,888 1_9.0. 70....._._3-,30_5204 15.320 ._.r._..._ 39,.W_S.. i,..pe_r_a_to r_I_n_Training .__.._�E_e..__.pt _-2_003_ __14._ 2,584 30,772 18.424 _3, _ 8,_ 2 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt 3714.BIX7 2,531 30,374 18.173 ,800 ..,Control Center Gerk _ Non-Eltempl am .. ...Uan - a,9ae a4A70 44an "3,ea - _.a9r99a.. 10 ._..._ .__._..__.. ._..____ -.11 ._ _ ._1. _. .. _. ._._... .. . ..._._.'... -Exempt.. . 2000 11332 1,984 23,571 14.114 2,448 29357 HNPer Non-Exempt '. FAHR COMMITTEE MeedngDe To8a.ofDir. 11/0812M 11/15/2000 AGENDA REPORT Im.Number Imm Number FAHROO-86 1 19ra7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. SUMMARY The District's independent auditors, Moreland & Associates, have completed their examination of the District's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2000 and have again issued an unqualified opinion. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding Auditor's report to the Committee. Michael Moreland, Partner, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors. This year, staff has again prepared the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that includes the audited financial statements. For the last six years, the District has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This year's report will again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Auditor's opinion letter, the Auditor's Report to the Committee, the Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Auditor's Appropriations Limit Report are attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H 1rgtlb\pamlp`HVN ApmW Repwb\1pD�t1w,tl ApM Prywb\11 WXem tply)tlx Ren. ypgp Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1999 2. Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 3. Auditor's Report to the FAHR Committee 4. Appropriations Limit Report H Agm R rta B WAp Rv 111W 11,,Cz A. a Page 2 f�l DOVE STREET,SUITE 890 NEMOm BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660 Oreland (7 ek ldd�r6GL6J Y,N (M)M2 25 CER➢PIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS SA RANCHEROS DRIVE.SUITE 260 SAN MARCOS.CA 92069 (760))52.3390 September 6,2000 The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of General Purpose Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards We have audited the combined financial statements of the Orange County Sanitation District, California (District) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated September 6, 2000. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the District's combined financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the District's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the combined financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the District and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. "D1 DOVE STREET.SUITE 690 V NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92 Moreland CO eXY4000LCGI(O: tYI2G (9,19)221-025 CERTIFIED PUBUC ACCOVMANTS 570 RANCHEROS DRIVE.SUITE M SAN A1ARCOS.CA 92059 (75D)7E2-SM September 6,2000 The Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District We have audited the combined financial statements of the Orange County Sanitation District, California (District) for the year ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated September 6, 2000. Under generally accepted auditing standards, we are providing you the attached information related to our audit. Our responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud and defalcations, may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, we considered the internal control over financial reporting of the District Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control over financial reporting. Significant Accounting Policies The significant accounting policies of the District are described in Note 1 to the combined financial statements. During the year, no new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed. We noted no significant, unusual transactions during the year, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management's current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. The judgments and estimates which may significantly affect the District's combined financial statements include establishing appropriate liabilities associated with general liability and workers' The Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District September 6,2000 Page 2 compensation claims. During our audit of the combined financial statements, we performed procedures to determine the reasonableness of the estimates used by management These procedures included,but were not limited to,inquiry of the District's attorney and review of a third party administrator's report which summarized the estimated liability needed for claims against the District Based on these and other procedures performed, we were able to conclude that the estimates mentioned above as recorded by management,appeared reasonable. Significant Audit Adjustments As a result of our audit related testwork, we proposed no corrections of the financial statements that, in our judgment, either individually or in the aggregate, had a significant effect on the District's financial reporting process. For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a significant audit adjustment as a proposed correction to the combined financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. Other information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements Our responsibility for other information in documents containing the District's combined financial statements and our report thereon does not extend beyond financial information identified in our report, and we have no obligation to perform any procedures to corroborate other information contained in these documents. We have, however, read the other information included in the District's comprehensive annual financial report;and no matters came to our attention that cause us to believe that such information, or its manner of presentation, is materially inconsistent with the information,or its manner of presentation,appearing in the financial statements. Disagreements With Management There were no disagreements with management on financial accounting and reporting matters that, if not satisfactorily resolved,would have caused a modification to our report on the District's 2000 financial statements. Consultation With Other Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a"second opinion"on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the District's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. The Finance,Administration and V Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District September 6,2000 Page 3 Maier Issues Discussed With Management Prior to Retention We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards,with management each year prior to retention as the Districts auditors. These discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship, and our responses were not a condition to our retention. This information is intended solely for the use of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and should not be used for any other purpose. However,we understand that this document may be public information, and its distribution its not limited. /- IZII V NM DOVE STREET,SUITERNIA [� // �_•�� // NEWPOR ESTREE,GLITE 680 92360 Qreland V�adaciafPd eY12IY W9I 221-0925 CERTIFlED FU6UC ACCOUNTANTS 570 RANCHEROS DRIVE,SUITE 260 SAN MARCOS,CA 92959 I1601752-S090 September 6,2000 The Finance,Adramistration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District Independent Accountants'Report on Agreed-Upon Procedures Applied to Appropriations Limit Worksheets We have applied the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 (or other alternative computation) for the Orange County Sanitation District (District)for the year ended June 30,2000. These procedures,which were agreed to by the District and the League of California Cities(as presented in the League publication entitled Article MIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines), were performed solely to assist the District in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. This engagement to apply agreed-upon procedures was performed in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of the procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of the report. Consequently,we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. The procedures performed and our findings were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed worksheets No. 1 through No. 7 (or other alternative computations) and compared the limit and annual adjustment factors included in those worksheets to the limit and annual adjustment factors that were adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. We also compared the population and inflation options included in the aforementioned worksheets to those that were selected by a recorded vote of the Board of Directors. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of these procedures. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No.6,we added line A, last year's limit,to line E, total adjustments, and compared the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a'result of these procedures. 3. We compared the current year information presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 to the other worksheets described in No. 1 above. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of this procedure. The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of y the Orange County Sanitation District September 6, 2000 Page 2 4. We compared the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the Board of Directors during the prior year. No procedures have been performed with respect to the determination of the appropriation limit for the base year, as defined by the League publication entitled Article;UIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of this procedure. We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 (or other alternative computation). Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures,other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the use of the District and should not be used by those who have not agreed to the procedures and taken responsibility for the sufficiency of the procedures for their purposes. However, this report may be amatter of public record and its distribution is not limited. /Aolc� Y AEG ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT „ APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1999-2000 BUDGET A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $47,t51,000 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% (average) 2. Inflation% 4.53% Total Adjustment % C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS $2,875,000 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub-total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS F $2,875,000 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $50,026,000 ♦ V MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT October 16, 2000, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on October 16, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickier, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip L. Anthony Brian Donahue Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Jan Debay Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Russell Patterson, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Bob Ghirelli Director John Fonley Kellen Burn-Roy, Dick Corneille Lisa Lawson Director Kelly E. Rowe - Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Wendy Sevenandt Debra Burris Michelle Tuchman - NCG Porter Novelli Shivaji Deshmukh John Collins - City of Fountain Valley Tom Dawes Edmund Soong, Mike Kremer Jill Everhart - Public Resources Advisory Group Jenny Glasser Bob Finn - Brown & Caldwell Clark Ida John Kennedy Mike Markus William R. Mills Jr. Ron Wildermuth 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Debay and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held September 18, 2000 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Financial Study Report Mr. Tom Dawes, program manager, introduced Ms. Wendy Sevenandt, project manager for the financial study. Ms. Sevenandt reported that Mr. Edmund Soong and Mr. Mike Kremer, Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG) would be giving the second update i GWR System Minutes October 16,2000 Page 2 of 4 on the progress of the financial study. Mr. Soong reported that the financial study model is complete and PRAG would be verifying assumptions with staff. The draft financial study will be presented to the Committee in November. 3. Request Authority to Negotiate Design for a Portion of Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline Mr. Dawes requested authority to solicit proposals for the early design of 2,200 feet of the GWR Pipeline. This portion of the GWR Pipeline needs to be installed by July or August 2001, as the Orange County Sheriff plans an expansion of the Theodore Lacey Jail, which requires use of the same land between the Garden Grove (22) and Santa Ana (5) Freeways. The final proposal will be returned to the Committee and would need approval by both the OCSD and OCWD Boards. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Debay and carried, the Committee granted authority to staff to solicit a proposal for Amendment No. 2 with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. for design of the GWR Pipeline adjacent to Orange County's Jail Facility. 4. Staffing Estimates Mr. Dawes introduced Mr. Bob Finn, Brown and Caldwell, who gave a report on staffing requirements. His report included existing and future water production department staffing and impact of labor costs on total O&M costs. An estimated 43 people will be needed to operate Phase 1 of the GWR System. He reported that this would be one of the final pieces needed for cost estimates for the project. 5. GWR System Staffing and Design Issues Mr. Dawes requested that a special workshop be scheduled to discuss implementation of the project. The Committee scheduled the workshop for Monday, October 30 at 11:00 a.m. in the OCWD Boardroom. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: a. A meeting is scheduled with Department of Health Services and the Regional Water Quality Control Board on November 3 to receive their comments on the Title 22 Engineering Report. GWR System Minutes October 16,2000 Page 3 of 4 b. Introduced Michelle Tuchman, NCG Porter Novelli, who gave an update on the Public Information Program: - Letters were mailed to 2,600 Homeowners Associations; - Lawrence Research has interviewed 500 high propensity voters. A report will be given to the Committee next month; - 50,000 postcards announcing public workshops will be mailed the first week of November; and - An invitation to health professionals will be mailed to request presentations. c. A$1,450,000 check has been received from the Bureau of Reclamation. The check was for the FY 2000 appropriation of$1,500,000, less a $50,000 Bureau administration fee for the Bureau's review of the EIR/EIS. d. The Independent Advisory Committee (IAC) has signed off on the Water Quality Evaluation reporting that the GWR System water is of higher quality than any other source to Orange County. A proposal will be brought back to the Committee to retain the services of the IAC for design oversight, particularly the monitoring equipment, if the project moves forward towards implementation. e. Proposals from firms for the well site appraisals will be received on October 19, 2000 and will be presented to the Committee at the October 30 meeting. f. Additional Committee meetings will be required and the Committee selected the following dates and times: - Monday, November 13- 11:00 a.m. - Monday, November 20-5:30 p.m. g. Additional workshops for new Directors will be needed and will be scheduled after the November elections. h. A presentation will be given to Anaheim's City Council on November 14 at 3:00 p.m. GENERAL MANAGERS' REPORTS OCWD General Manager Mills reported that: - President Clinton vetoed the water and energy bill, but that Congresswoman Sanchez and Congressman Packard are still trying to raise the $20 million grant to $80 million for the project. GWR System Minutes October 16,2000 Page 4 of 4 - He and Blake Anderson met with Paul Jones, General Manager of Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) who presented IRWD's alternatives to the construction of the GWR System. Discussion followed and the Committee discussed sending a letter to IRWD, with a copy to the groundwater producers, expressing disappointment that the GWR System staff and Committee have not been able to see or comment on this plan. The next Public Information Program Subcommittee meeting will be held October 24. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for October 30, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT October 30, 2000, 11:00 a.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 11:00 a.m. on October 30, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip L. Anthony Brian Donahue Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Jan Debay Russell Patterson, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Blake Anderson Director Wes Kellene Bum-Roy, Paul Brown Bannister Bob Ghirelli Director Kelly E. Rowe - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Jim Herberg Debra Burris Guy Carrozzo—Mayor of Fountain Valley Lisa Lawson Steve Conklin Thom Coughran - City of Santa Ana David Ludwin Tom Dawes Bill Everest— Boyle Engineering Bob Ooten Jennifer DeNoyer Wendy Sevenandl Shivaji Deshmukh General Counsel Jill Everhart - Brad Hogin Cindy Gehman -Thomas Woodruff Jenny Glasser Clark Ida John Kennedy Mike Markus Mehul Patel Ron Wildermuth 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Donahue, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held October 16, 2000 were approved as mailed. J GWR System Minutes October 30,2000 Page 2 of 4 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline Agreement Tom Dawes, Program Manager, reported that the agreement between the Orange County Flood Control District (County) and Orange County Water District providing the right-of-way for the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline along the Santa Ana River is under final review by both parties and that OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District General Counsels would be reviewing the final draft of the agreement later this week. He reported that the right-of-way agreement with the County would provide the following, A free easement in favor of OCWD along the Santa Ana River and Carbon Creek Diversion Channels rights-of-way; • County can use OCWD's Santiago Basin for flood retardation • OCWD can use Miller Basin for percolation • OCWD can install future injection wells along the Santa Ana River • GWR System pays full cost of the Pipeline, including County's inspection charges ($100,000 deposit required when construction starts.) Director Patterson requested that future plans involving Santiago Creek be sent to all JCC members. Director Bannister requested that the agreement should state the responsible party for pollution clean up if the County uses the Santiago Basin for flood retardation. 3. Well Site Appraiser Selection Mr. Dawes reported that the lowest cost proposer for the well site appraisals for the eight new barrier injection well sites was Gary L. Vogt and Associates and he recommended issuance of a task order accordingly in an amount not to exceed $24,000. He stated that additional costs would include title reports at a cost of approximately $5,000. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee authorized issuance of a task order to Gary L. Vogt and Associates, in an amount not to exceed $24,000, for appraisal services for eight new injection well sites for the GWR System. GWR System Minutes October 30,2000 Page 3 of 4 4. Purchase and Install Flat Sheet Membrane Test Units Mr. Dawes reported that a flat-sheet membrane test unit is needed to be able to rapidly screen all new commercial and experimental membranes used in the performance of reverse osmosis testing and verification on microfiltration feed water. He recommended that a budget item in an amount not to exceed $20,000 be approved. Mr. Dawes advised that the budget would cover the purchase of the test unit, related piping, and installation (by force account). The Committee directed that If the purchase of the membrane is from a sole source, staff is to report back to the Committee and to follow OCWD's purchasing policy. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee authorized the purchase and installation of a flat-sheet membrane test unit for reverse osmosis for an amount not to exceed $20,000. 5. Program Management Mr. Dawes presented two alternative models for Program Management, which would include a method of implementation and how to meet project scheduling for the project if it is approved. He reported that there would be little difference in costs between the two alternatives. This item was treated as a workshop item. Discussion followed, with a request that pros and cons of the program management alternatives be brought back to the Committee at the next meeting. 6. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: a. Gave an update on the Public Information Program: - Letters were mailed to 150 larger Orange County businesses, which resulted in requests for 20 tours/presentations; - About 1,500 letters to homeowners associations about the GWR System were made. An article for homeowners newsletters has been prepared and will be sent to homeowners associations who request one; - 1,500 letters for medical outreach program will be sent out shortly; - Postcards announcing the public workshops are to be mailed and one- eighth page ads are to be run in local and regional newspapers advertising the workshops; and - Briefings are being scheduled with news media. u GWR System Minutes October 30,2000 Page 4 of 4 b. Briefings on the IRWD alternative proposal will be made to OCSD's FAHR Committee and the OCWD Groundwater Producers, both on November B. c. Detailed breakdown of cost estimates will be presented at the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held on November 13, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. The estimated capital cost is $352 million. The estimated unit cost is now lower than that estimated in December 1999, and will be under$450/af, from a water standpoint. GENERAL MANAGERS' REPORTS OCSD General Manager Anderson suggested that staff should seek an endorsement for the project from SAWPA and/or its member agencies. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS Director Eckenrode noted that the unit cost per acre-feet price of GWR System water should be calculated over a longer life and not just the shorter financial amortization period. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for November 13, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. Annual ; Financial Report S it\� - b f - • - for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000 444444 i\ h Orange County Sanitation District, California r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 r r r r Prepared By: Department of Finance Accounting Division Michael D.White, CPA r Controller r r r W i �U ILi !W IWI W (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) IW IWI IWI W' f WI u I� �4JI W u ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r Table of Contents For the Year Ended June 30, 2000 r INTRODUCTORY SECTION: pane Letterof Transmittal..................................................................................................................... I GFOA Certificate of Achievement ............................................................................_................. A .+ Board of Directors........................................................................................................................ A OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... xili Mapof Service Area..................................................................................................................... xtv FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors'Report....................................................................................................... 1 Combined Financial Statements(General Purpose Financial Statements): r Combined Balance Sheets............................................................................................4..... 45 Combined Statements of Revenues. Expenses, and Changes in RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... 6 Combined Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................. 7 Notes to Combined Financial Statements........................................................................... 8-23 Combining Financial Statements: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 26-27 Combining Statement of Revenues,Expenses,and Changes in RetainedEarnings............................................................................................................ 28.29 Combining Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 30 STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited): Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years,.........4...............0....................................................... 31 Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Yews..........—.......................... 32 r Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years............................... 33 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property- LastTen Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 34 Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments- "' Last Ten Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 35 PrincipalUsers...........o.................04......................................................................................0-0— 35 Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses—Last Ten Fiscal Years....... 36 Bond Coverage-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 37 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 38 Demographic Statistics-Last Ten Fiscal Years...............................................................4.......0.4 39 Property Value and Construction-Last Ten Fiscal Years........................................................... 40 Estimated Populations of Cities Served by the Orange County Sanitation District...................... 41 Insurancein Force...-.................................................................................................................. 42 Comparison of the Volume of Wastewater Treated With Revenues and Expenses- ,� Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................................4.......................... ...................... 43 Biosolids Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................ 44 MiscellaneousStatistics............................................................................................................... 45 r r m (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) LJ u u u u u u u r r r� r r OCSD Introductory Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000 r r r r r r r r r r r N - K 1 0 a - c n o - Ln ro - n 0 3 — ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT as September 6, 2000 (7141962-2411 :a.lnap address: The Board of Directors of the Po. ea.Bi �buntela'oxa 27cA OrangeCounty Sanitation District, ty 02728-8127 Orange County, California street add.: 0844 Ellis Avenue Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the Orange County Sanitation lturwm wit,,rn District, Orange County, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. This report includes the 92708.7018 financial position and activity of the nine individual revenue areas, as described within the Governmental Structure below, as of June 30, 2000 and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the District's ass Finance Department. Mamba, Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, Apenele. including all disclosures, rests with the District. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed ass data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial Miss position and results of operations of the District. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an Ar charm understanding of the District's financial activities have been included. Brea Buena Pan: The report presented herewith consists of three parts: (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of Lya Faunr Fullerton transmittal, a Governmental Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement, a listing of the Board as ulreWrtonarron of Directors, an organization chart, and a map of the individual revenue areas; (2) a financial section GeMan Grose consisting of the independent auditors' report, general purpose financial statements, and combining Hundng[on Beech trwne statements of the individual Revenue Area Funds; and (3) a statistical section consisting of pertinent La Habra financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information about the District. as Le Palma Loa Alemdte Included within the accompanyingfinancial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and Newport Beech 9 Grange functions controlled by the District's Board of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting as Pla`em. Standards Board Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity". For the purpose of this Santa A. Stall Btach evaluation, control was determined by the Board's responsibility for: (1) adoption of the budget and user Stanton charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are Tustin ass Ville Perk described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. lbrba urea arty or orenpe GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE as e Dar, Districts The Orange County Sanitation District encompasses the Northern section of Orange County. The District caste Masa provides wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering 471 square miles and serving a mammy city population of 2,214,000 or approximately 86 percent of the County's population. The District was Water Districts originally incorporated in 1954 as nine separate public corporations, or districts. In April of 1998, at the District's request, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution No. 98-140 ass Irnne Ranch ordering the consolidation of these nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District, effective July 1, 1998. This action was recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate as accounting and auditing processes. The boundaries of the nine previous districts had remained intact for the purpose of collecting sewer user fees at the previously established rate schedules, and were referred to as nine individual revenue areas through June 30, 2000, Effective July 1, 2000, all Revenue Areas, 'Meads c g,�Leadership M Wastewater and Water Pisan a Management' L L except Revenue Area 7 and 14, consolidated user fee rates and all enterprise fund accounting and budgeting activities. I The District is managed by an administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the agencies or cities which are serviced by the District. Each of the three remaining Revenue Areas (the Consolidated Revenue Area, Revenue Area 7 and Revenue Area 14) has its own budget and is responsible for the construction and maintenance of its own collection system. All Revenue Areas, except u Revenue Area 14 and the portion of the Consolidated Revenue Area previously known as Revenue Area 13, receive their own share of the one-percent ad valorem property tax levy. In addition, all Revenue Areas except Revenue Area 14, collect user fees from property owners. Revenue Area 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District The purpose of the District's wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve 1 the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the �I treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency. J The District sewerage system includes approximately 650 miles of sewers that convey wastewater J� generated within the District's boundaries to the District's two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd). Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mild. Approximately 50 percent of u the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. j L Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined and discharged to the ocean off the Huntington Beach coast through an outfall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five miles long. The last mile of the outfall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK Orange County represents one of the major economic centers in the state and nation. However, according to the Anderson Center for Economic Research at Chapman University, the four major engines L of econcomic growth in the County appear to be"headed South". According to Chapman University, the most important of these engines is growth in real Gross Domestic Project (GDP) projected to decrease from the 2000 ran°quarter peak of 5.6 percent to an average annual rate of growth of 2.8 percent in 2001. L The overall projected decline in GDP is supported by the declines in the growth rates for both defense goods orders and international trade. In 1999,jobs in Orange County increased by 3.5 percent. However, Chapman University projects the net LJ number of new jobs created in the County will drop to 35,063 in 2001 from a projected 42,262 in 2000. This forecast includes an estimate for the projected impact on jobs as a result of the opening of Disney's r , California Adventure theme park in Anaheim. It is estimated that roughly 7,000 jobs will be created in the County in 2000-01 because of the new theme park. This represents a 50 percent increase from the 14,000 already employed at Disneyland. Contributing towards the decline in job growth is the downward trend in construction valuation, the measurement of current spending on residential and nonresidential building projects. Continuing declines in the growth of building permits in 2000 will negatively affect job formation in 2001 as total building permit ( i ii I�JI u valuation is forecasted to increase only 2.4 percent in 2000 from the 14.2 percent increase that occurred in 1999. A slower rate of construction activity not only has a negative impact on construction jobs but on other sectors as well, particularly jobs in the retail, services and finance, insurance and real estate Otl sectors. Slower job creation will negatively affect taxable sales growth in the County. The decline in taxable sales is forecasted to be moderate from an average annual increase of 7.9 percent in 1999,down to a projected increase of 6.7 percent in 2000 and a forecasted increase of 6.3 percent in 2001. However, the decline in those taxable sales categories relating to the construction industry will be more significant. The furniture and appliances category is forecasted to decline from a 10.2 percent growth rate in 1999 to 5.9 percent in 2000. Likewise,the building materials category is forecasted to decline from a 16.3 percent growth rate in 1999 to 8.7 percent in 2000. In April of 2000,the Board of Directors adopted a consolidated rate structure for all Revenue Areas except Revenue Areas 7 and 14. The sewer services provided to Revenue Area 14 are funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District since the District receives no property tax or user fees directly from the property owners within Revenue Area 14. Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of sewers that are maintained by the District and has some additional organizational issues to be resolved. In moving to a one rate structure, the Board of Directors implemented the lowest rate structure of any of the seven Revenue Areas scheduled to be consolidated in accordance with the previously adopted rate schedule for 2000.01. This resulted in fee reductions for approximately two-thirds of the Districts sewer service users. " On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) collectively filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. At the time, the District had $454.3 million on deposit in the OCIP. On May 2, 1995, the Bankruptcy Court approved a comprehensive settlement agreement between the County, the OCIP, and a majority of the OCIP participants, including the District The District recovered bankruptcy settlements totaling $431.3 million between May 1995 and the final settlement distribution in February and March of 2000. The remainder of r $23.0 million, or 5.1 percent of the original deposit, was recorded as a loss in the fiscal year ended June 30,2000. In 1998,the District conducted an in-depth review of its reserve policies. This review included a survey of " the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 2000, the Districts designated retained earnings totaled $433 million, and have been earmarked for the following specific purposes in accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy: Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 60 million Designated For Self-Insurance 57 million Designated For Capital Improvements 259 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 32 million Designated For Rate Stabilization 25 million Total Designated Retained Earnings $433 million r MAJOR INITIATIVES Reinvention Based on an Operations and Maintenance (O&M)efficiency assessment conducted In the Spring of 1995, it was determined that an additional 16 percent reduction in personnel and technology costs would have to be achieved in order to become "best in class". Shortly following this assessment, a District's Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed to involve employees in the implementation of new work practices that would provide for the reduction in operating costs and increase the agency's W efficiency to match that of the most efficient wastewater treatment agency. During fiscal year 1997-98, DART completed the DART Reinvention Report that contained the reinvention and implementation plan components. The report includes DARTS mission and goals and provides recommendations for changes in the following three areas. • Business practices, which are the philosophical tenets of the organization. The business practices describe"why"an organization performs functions in a specific manner. • Work practices, which are the policies and procedures (the "what" and "how") developed by the organization to implement the business practices. • Reinvention tools, which are the support systems needed by the organization and employees to apply the business practices and work practices to their activities. The following tasks were the focus of DART's effort during fiscal year 1999-00: Information Systems Integration -The DART Implementation Plan identifies the need to link the financial information system and plant automation system to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). To meet the identified need, a new planning and scheduling module for the CMMS has been purchased and is currently being tested. The module was added during the 1998-99 fiscal year. During the 1999-00, the module was updated to fit in with the Planning and Scheduling program and is currently v being tested. Reinvention Training - Four reinvention training goals were established for fiscal year 1998-99. The V DART Reinvention Concept workshops for O&M personnel were conducted in November and December of 1998. Area Team training scope and consultant hiring was completed in the third quarter of 1998-99. Technical training requirements to broaden the skills of O&M personnel have been identified and were implemented in the fourth quarter of 1998-99. The Planning and Scheduling training was delayed until �. fiscal year 2000-01 to coincide with the implementation of the CMMS Planning&Scheduling Module. Area & Utility Team Implementation - The Process Area Utility Teams are supporting the Reinvention Automation Project (J42). The teams have been making improvement recommendations and reviewing plant documentation to support the automation project workshops. The teams' automation project input has focused on optimizing the plant processes through improved control systems. u Asset Management Program—The development and implementation of the Asset Management Program was the number one reinvention priority for fiscal year 1999-00. This program developed a means to track equipment costs and use the cost data to make improved maintenance decisions. It is the foundation upon which the Planning and Scheduling Program will be built. Project Specialists are developing the managed maintenance criteria (such as cost centers, process criticality and lifecycle evaluation) and entering data into the CMMS. Maintenance Division supervision and staff are reorganizing the maintenance program based on the new criteria. W IV u r r In August 2000, the District received the Outstanding Public Service Award from the California Association of Sanitation Agencies for its investigation of the Huntington Beach closure during the Summer of 1999. ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS The Districts accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the Districts accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. ,r The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management We believe that the Districts internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. r Each year the Districts Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. A joint works budget is first prepared that identifies the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the r District during the year. Upon adoption, Districts staff allocates the joint works budget proportionately to each of the individual Revenue Areas and obtains individual Revenue Area budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, r or fund level. The District has adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS r Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the District, which are financed and operated in r a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the District to determine that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital expenditures for providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the Districts enterprise operations over the past two fiscal years is as follows: Amount Percent Summary of of Increase of Increase Revenues and Expenses 1999-00 1998-99 Decrease Decrease Operating revenues $81,637,056 $69,875,503 $ 11,761,553 16.83% 'tl Operating expenses, including depreciation 95,797,825 97,167,054 (1,369,229) (1.41)% .. Operating income (loss) (14,160,769) (27,291,551) 13,130,782 48.11% Non-operating income, net 17,742,439 35,682,842 (17,940,403) (50.28)% r Net income $ 3,681.670 $ 8,391,291 $ 4,8( O9'621) (57.32)% vii r L ,l Ir Operating revenues increased in 1999-00 primarily because of the $11.8 million, or 16.97 percent increase in service charges over the prior year. The Increase in service charges is primarily due to(1)the increase in the percentage of total property tax and user fee collected by the County to the total levy from 95.06 percent in 1998-99 to 98.89 percent in 1999-00, (2) the increase in residential and non-residential construction of$3.97 billion during 1999-00, and (3) the increase in the average sewer user fee rate of 3.20 percent over the prior year. r The 1.41 percent decrease in net operating expenses over the prior year is the net result of a $4.7 million, or 8.67 percent increase in operating expenses before depreciation and amortization, and a $6.1 million, or 14.38 percent decrease in depreciation and amortization expense. In breaking down the 8.67 percent V increase in operating expenses before depreciation, collection operating activities increased 28.50 percent, or$2.4 million,while treatment and disposal operating expenses increased by only 5.02 percent, or$2.3 million. L In analyzing salaries and benefits alone within collection activities and treatment and disposal activities, salaries and wages increased $1.8 million, or 37.51 percent within collection activities and $2.97 million, or 12.4 percent within treatment and disposal activities. These increases are offset by reductions to W salaries and benefits allocated to the District's capital improvement program. Including salaries and benefits allocated to capital projects, total District salaries and benefits were $38.6 million down $21,500, or 0.6 percent from the prior year. The reallocation of salaries and benefits among collection activities, v treatment and disposal activities and capital improvements is reflective of the enhancements made to the District's cost allocation system. Contractual services within the collection activities went up$1.1 million,or 70.66 percent. This increase is primarily due to the contractual review of the County Assessor's database for under-assessed and unassessed parcels against actual site visits performed on 4,000 parcels at a cost of$1 million. W The$6.1 million, or 14.38 percent decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is attributable to the "catch up" in depreciation expense recorded In the prior year. The capitalization of many capital improvements was delayed during the implementation of the new financial information system. As a L result, several years of past depreciation were taken in the prior year. The 50.28 percent, or$17.9 million decrease in net non-operating income is comprised of a $4.8 million, I or 8.97 percent increase in non-operating income and a $22.8 million, or 123.68 percent increase in non- W operating expenses. The increase in non-operating Income includes a $2.89 million, ar 16.12 percent increase in interest revenues and a $2.7 million, or 8.29 percent increase in property tax revenues. The increase in interest revenues is attributable to (1) higher cash and investment balances which in total grew by $56.3 million primarily as a result of bankruptcy proceeds received from the County of Orange, and (2) higher yields earned on investments over the prior year, up 0.26 percent over the prior to 5.15 percent. The $2.7 million increase in property tax revenues is reflective of the continuing uptum in the real estate market as total assessed valuations have also increased over the prior year by 8.13 percent. The 123.68 percent decrease in non-operating expenses is primarily attributable to the recognition on the loss on investment in the Orange County Pool of$23.0 million. W .y DEBT ADMINISTRATION At June 30,2000, the District had a number of certificates of participation debt issues outstanding. These I" issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, totaled $359.9 million. The District has maintained its AA-rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services. u vill u r On August 31, 2000, the District issued $218.6 million Series 2000 Refunding Certificates of Participation r to levelize the District's aggregate net debt service, modernize bond legal documents, place all certificates of participation on a single lien, and to better accommodate future financing needs. The Series 2000 Certificates of Participation refunded$347.5 million of previously issued certificates of participation as well as generating $32.67 million as reimbursement for additional improvements to the wastewater system. r The District received a Aa3 from Moody's Investor Services, a AAIA-1 from Standard and Pooes Corporation, and a AA from Fitch on this issue. r Over the next ten years, the District is projecting an additional $1.18 billion In future treatment plant and collection system capital improvements. In accordance with the District's long-term debt fiscal policy, 50 percent of these improvements will be funded through current revenues with the other 50 percent being funded through the issuance of new debt. CASH MANAGEMENT The District's investment portfolio, except for the District's debt service reserves, investments with the State Loral Agency Investment Fund, and overnight repurchase agreements of idle cash within the District's general bank account, are managed by an outside money manager, Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO), who perform the daily investment activities, and by Mellon Trust, who serves as the District's Independent custodian bank. This externally managed portfolio consists of a short 'tl tern investment pool of$33,083,000 at June 30, 2000 that has maturities out to 180 days, and a long- term investment pool of$363,713,000 that has maturities out to five years. Investments of this externally managed investment porlfotlo consist of U.S. Government securities, corporate bonds, commercial paper, r and money market mutual funds. Investments of the District's debt service reserves totaling $32.1 million consist of bank investment contracts of$27.7 million with Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank, maturing out to August 1, 2013,and$4.4 million in open-ended mutual funds. r The yield on maturing investments averaged 5.15 percent, up 0.26 percent from the prior year average of 4.89 percent. Interest earnings for the year were $20,836.000, an increase of$2,892,000 over the prior fiscal year total of$17,944,000. As previously mentioned, this Increase is due to a combination of larger cash balances available for Investment along with a slightly higher yield on investments. RISK MANAGEMENT r For the year ended June 30, 2000. the District was self-insured for a portion of workers' compensation and property damage. The self-insured portion for workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $300 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is $100,000 or 5 percent per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to$50 million. The District also maintains outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The District is insured for general liability up to $25 million per occurrence with a seH-insured portion of$100,000. r District management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 2000 that would materially affect the financial position of the District. ix r i V i Ir INDEPENDENT AUDIT L An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the District is conducted annually by independent certified public accountants. The District selected the accounting firm of Moreland & Associates, Inc., to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 2000. The auditors' report on the �+ District's combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report. This report renders an unqualified opinion on the District's combined financial statements for the year ended June 30,2000. L CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING iW The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a ri Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Orange County Sanitation District for the District's comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1999. This was the sixth consecutive year that the District has received this award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of L Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. V A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division staff, and I would like to especially express my appreciation to Julie Matsumoto who assisted in its �+ preparation. I would also like to thank the District's Boards of Directors, the General Manager, and the Director of Finance for their interest and support in conducting the financial operations of the District In a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, 0e y Michael D.White, CPA Controller r+ x L Certificate of .. Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to Orange County Sanitation District, California For its Comprehensive Annual YJ Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers r Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial _ reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. Van mremrm �C President pp Executive Director ri r xi r y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Board of Directors As of June 30,2000 y AGENCY ACTIVE DIRECTOR ALTERNATE DIRECTOR Cities: y Anaheim Shirley McCracken Tom Day Brea Lynn Daucher Roy Moore Buena Park Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller L. Cypress Anna L.Piercy Tim Keenan Fountain Valley Guy Carr=o Larry Crandall Fullerton Don Bankhead Jan Flory Garden Grove Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater Huntington Beach Peter Green Dave Garofalo Irvine Christina Shea Greg Smith La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian y, La Palma Paul Walker Kenneth Blake Los Alamitos Charles E.Sylvia Art DeBoa Newport Beach Jan Debay Tom Thomson Orange Mark A.Murphy Mike Spurgeon Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Michael L.MaeAzweiler Santa Ana Pat McGuigan Thomas E.Lute Seal Beach Shawn Boyd John Larson Stanton Brian Donahue Harry Dotson V Tustin Thomas R.Saltarelli Jim Potts Villa Park Russell Patterson Richard A.Freschi V Yorba Linda John M.Gullixson Ken Ryan Sanitary/Water Districts: i Costa Mesa Sanitary District James M.Ferryman Arthur Perry �+ Midway City Sanitary District Joy L. Neugebauer James V.Evans Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller County Areas: Member of the Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith r �r b v xii V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Organizational Chart June 30,2000 r BOMOOF OIgECrg6 r D ew GBIFNL CWNSfl uwRGEII OFRCE r COAPIUNIGTgIB XUM.WRESOUFCFS FlWWCE INPoX ow O�TPOMLmiffewm TECHNGL EIgNEERINp wDaOWM TECXNDLODY MYMENgNCE 9EMNCEB DEVELOFMEM r COIO.IUNIGTptffi XUMw FlNMfiE INMMIMTENI OFSnNTNINS6 TFCXMGL FNEINEEMND PDWIUEIMTIW NESDURCEE MA9NISTRATIDN TECXIKl04Y EWNIUMTI 9F "Tl w19X15fMTIdJ DD ONVff MMWSrMTbN FDA9NISTMTICN IDWMSfMTIQN DEVELOPMEM r SRMT wWUMIND CUSTWEM6 CMUTION ENNPA CE& ENLiNEENNO DIM&TOMS Numn FRCILITIO MOWr Jw DES10116 EEORETMiY 9UFPoM MNNiENMICE MOMTOitlNG FWYlINp r PUMb ous WIODM E RPMFOfwTIF6 EIMfLINM CgATMUCMM WMEXOUEE 6GTIM MNMBLWCE BCIEXCM EE MViMiBAEM SYSTEMS VSOMTOMY r FMOCESS EN CO PMNM SDUMLT: MF018 CiNE&ING COMfgL IN1EfAAnoN r M N0.1 OF'FAATIONS EMffiEMGENCY MFBPoN� r RANr lq.t oFErwnoM r MEDHwIG1 M4MB10NLE r FLE ATT N9IMIWEWATI ION MNMFNwCE r CEMROL MEM1EAnTIW r MM Wwrrs sFxw FMDIxTs r r r Xlli r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Map of Service Area June 30,2000 r, r LOS ANGELES COUNTY IT r •LA HABRA e 9ry6z BREA ♦�.,.... O H4' G0J2 OL''" 0 G~�3- GE FULLERTON ♦ YORBA LINDA hP PLACENTIA PAtc tit 10 I PALIA BUENA ANAHEIM O f. PARK r Flyp RESS VIL _ ANAHEIM - FAIR r LOS STANTON ORANGE ALAMITOS ♦�" GARDEN GROVE - Q SEAL BEADH W TMINSTER r J MIrrBIlPJAV 9ANTA ANA 'TTM ♦ Qo TUSTIN FDUNTA VALLEY ' HUNTINGTON - BEACH COSTA MESA ♦ _ Reclamation I"NE Plant No. 1 5 _ Treatment NEWP TBEA _ Plant No. 2 Q JNYY 51N I)/ t N i A� r Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) O°C e.. ........ Orange County,CA Rev.1999 %IV r w 1 a OCS Financial Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000 ML r C" r r i r M M (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) ,. 7 Ol 7 n d _ to n �K, 0 l �W ■ 2 IMI DOVE STREET.SUITE 660 Moreland £>r�Odao�icclea r�. (949)P222R225 0 CALIFORNIA 92860 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 57D RANCHEROS DRIVE,SUITE no SAN MARCOS,CA 92069 (760)962- 3 September 6,2000 The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Independent Auditors'Report We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the Orange County Sanitation District, California (District) as of and for the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, as listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the District's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Combined financial statements based on our audits. We Conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits Contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall Combined financial statement presentation.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion,the Combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the District as of June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the results of Its operations and rash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditino Standards,we have also issued our report dated September 6, 2000 on our consideration of the District's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its Compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts. That report is an integral par of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditino Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits. '— Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements of the District taken as a whole, The accompanying Combining financial statements listed in the table of Contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the Combined financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information listed in the table of Contents was not audited by us and,accordingly,we do not express an opinion thereon. 1 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) u II IW IW ICI I�I {IW' IW� uI IL.I u 2 r V J s.l Yd r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS J V i r J 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ` Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 2000 and 1999 2000 1999 Current assets: Cash and rash equivalents (note 2) $ 59,504,895 $ 21,101.780 Investments(note 2) 181,070,515 198,876,239 v Receivables: Accounts, net of allowance for uncollectibles 6,535,506 3,999,091 Accrued interest 4,612.122 4,379,724 � Due from other governmental agencies 1,095.947 - Total receivables 12,243,575 8.378,815 Inventories 4,722,376 4.817.568 Prepaid and other assets 665,618 813,903 - Total current assets 258,206,979 233,988,305 Restricted assets: - Cash and cash equivalents (notes 2 and 4) 47,485,209 14,994,859 �L Investments(note 2) 144,495,190 141,320,842 Receivables: Accrued interest 528,802 522,258 v Connection fees 1,057,282 1,427.960 _ Other 959,157 855,755 Total receivables 2,545,241 2,805,973 Total restricted assets 194,525,640 159,121,674 - Due from other governmental agencies, noncurrent 88,340,640 Deferred charges 1,839,256 1,945,236 Property,plant and equipment,at cost(notes 3 and 7): u Land 10,398,596 7,140,674 Sewage collection facilities 357,104,332 315,363,531 Sewage treatment facilities 600,045,285 574,647,470 u Sewage disposal facilities 90,108,851 90.094,215 General plant and administrative facilities 111,354,203 103,209,892 Contruction in progress 114,539,323 130,968,813 Total property, plant and equipment 1,283,550,590 1,221,424,595 Less accumulated depreciation (453,368,680) (417,865,344) ,r Net property,plant and equipment 830,181,910 803,559,251 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 7) 10,771,074 11,428,783 Other assets,at cost,less accumulated amortization 3,359,819 1,009,298 Total assets $1.298,884,678 $1,299,393,187 (Continued) See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 4 u ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Balance Sheets (Continued) r June 30, 2000 and 1999 r 2000 1999 Current liabilities payable from current assets: Accounts payable $ 6,307.595 $ 6,998,462 Accrued expenses 4,127,913 2,706,182 Total current liabilities payable from current assets 10,435,508 9,704,644 r �+ Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: Retentions payable 428.090 2,220.285 Interest payable 4,414.553 4,513,730 r Deposits 261.957 2,639.643 Claims and judgments payable,current portion(note 4) 519.470 525,428 Certificates of participation payable, current portion (note 4) 13.790,000 12,880,000 r Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 19,414,070 22.779,086 Long-term liabilities: r Compensated absences(note 4) 3,566,900 3,237.800 Claims and judgments payable, noncurrent portion(note 4) 486,530 937,888 Arbitrage payable (note 4) 303,500 303,500 Certificates of participation payable, noncurrent portion, net of discount(note 4) 346.145.592 359,854,634 Deferred revenue 80,408 Total long-term liabilities 350,502.522 364,414,230 r Total liabilities 380,352,100 396,897,960 Fund equity: Contributed capital (notes 5 and 7) 258.074,943 246,276,971 Retained earnings 660,457,635 656,218,256 Total fund equity 918.532,578 902,495,227 r Total liabilities and fund equity $1,298,854,678 $1,299,393,187 See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings For the Years Ended June 30,2000 and 1999 v 2000 1999 Operating revenues: u Service charges $ 81,240.958 $ 69,452,185 Permit and inspection fees 396.098 423.318 Total operating revenues 81,637,056 69,875,503 v Operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization: Collection activities: Salaries and benefits 6,616,110 4,811,246 v Utilities 3,548 2,900 Supplies,repairs and maintenance 1,222.779 1,595,805 Contractual services 2,624,390 1,537,793 Directors'fees 63,350 74,169 v Meetings and training 4,552 5,617 Other 377,403 464,215 Total collection activities 10,912,132 8,491,745 Treatment and disposal activities: Salaries and benefits 26,964.848 23,997,715 Utilities 3,617,401 3,317,113 Supplies,repairs and maintenance 4,028,978 6,214.044 Contractual services 10,978,131 9,074,953 Meetings and training 853,960 752,236 jr Other 2,059,050 2,827,600 Total treatment and disposal activities 48,502,368 46,183,661 Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization 59,414,500 54,675,406 Operating income before depreciation and amortization 22,222,556 15,200,097 Depreciation and amortization 35,725.616 41,833,939 W Amortization of excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 7) 657,709 657,709 Operating loss (14,160,769) (27,291,551) �a Non-operating revenues: Property taxes 35,557,267 32,835,628 Interest 20,836.416 17,944,380 Other 2,571,942 3,332,066 Total non-operating revenues 58,965,625 54,112,074 Non-operfing expenses: 1itl Interest 18,150,572 18.359,361 _ Loss on investment in Orange County Pool(Note 10) 22,994,647 - Other 77,967 69,871 u Total non-operating expenses 41,223,186 18,429.232 Net income 3,581,670 8,391.291 V Add amortization related to contributed equity(notes 5 and 7) 657,709 657,709 Net increase in retained earnings 4,239,379 9,049,000 Lr Retained earnings,beginning of year 656,218.256 647,169,256 Retained earnings,end of year $ 660.457.635 $ 656,218,256 Sea Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 6 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combined Statements of Cash Flows r For the Years Ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 2000 1999 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating loss $ (14,160.769) $ (27,291,551) Adustments to reconcile operating loss to r net cash provided by operations: Depreciation and amortization 35,725,616 41,833,939 Amortization of excess book value over purchase price 657,709 657,709 Other non-operating revenues 2,532,956 3,385,983 y Other nono eratm expenses (119,488) - (Increase)decrease in assets: Accounts receivable (2,536.415) 21,669 .. Due from other governmental agencies 64,250,046 248.167 Other receivables (103,402) 3,557 Inventories 95,192 (423,543) „r Prepaid and other assets 148,285 (506,716) Increase(decrease)in liabilities: Accounts payable (690,867) 1,405,169 Accrued expenses 1,421.731 (2,316,741) Retentions payable (1,792,195) (237,286) Deposits (2,377,686) 822,497 Other liabilities - (2,213) r Compensated absences 329,100 172,200 Claims and judgments payable (457,316) 31,305 Net cash provided by operations 82,922,497 17,804,145 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Proceeds from property taxes 35,557,267 32,835,628 r Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Additions to property,plant and equipment (63,019,895) (44,549,304) Additions to other assets (2,687,587) 1,911,749 Disposal of other assets 114,786 - �' Interest paid (17,168,812) (18,474,932) Principal payments on certificates of participation (12,880,000) (12,105,000) Principal payments on bonds - (15,000) r Proceeds from capital contributions 12,826,359 6,415,095 Net cash used for capital and related financing activities (B2,815,149) (66,817,392) Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of investments 1,469,161,155 961,314.152 Purchases of investments (1,450,a20,393) (1,005,529,423) r Interest received 16,888,088 25,027,641 Net cash provided by(used for)investing activities 35,228,850 (19,187,630) ar Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents 70,893,465 (36,385,249) Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 36,096,639 71.461,888 Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $ 106.990,104 $ 36,096,639 r Noncesh Activities: Unrealized gaird(loss)on the fair value of investments $ 3,709,386 $ (5,765,524) Bad debt expense-loss on investment in Orange County Pool(Note 10) 22,994,647 - r See Accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements. 7 r L.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements L June 30,2000 and 1999 (1) Summary of Sion'fiicant Accounting Policies V Reporting Entity The Orange County Sanitation District(District)is a public agency which owns and operates certain L wastewater facilities in order to provide regional wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to approximately 2.2 million people in the northern and central portion of the County of Orange, California. The District is managed by an administrative organization comprised of L directors appointed by the agencies and cities which are serviced by the District. The District's service area was originally formed in 1954 pursuant to the County Sanitation District ! Act and consisted of seven independent special districts. Two additional districts were formed and v additional service areas were added in 1985 and 1986. These special districts were jointly responsible for the treatment and disposal facilities which they each used. In April of 1998, the Board of Supervisors of Orange County passed Resolution 98-140 approving the consolidation of L the existing nine special districts into a new, single sanitation district. This action was taken in order to simplify the governance structures, reduce the size of the District's Board of Directors, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and I auditing processes. Pursuant to the Resolution and Government Code Section 57500, the Li predecessor special districts transferred and assigned all of their powers, rights, duties,obligations, functions and properties to the District, including all assets,liabilities,and equity. Effective July 1, 1998, the organization became known as the Orange County Sanitation District. L The boundaries of the nine previous districts have been maintained for the purpose of collecting sewer user fees at the previously established rate schedules and are now referred to as revenue areas. The District utilizes joint operating and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs of each revenue area. These joint costs are allocated to each revenue area based on gallons of sewage Flow. The District is independent of and overlaps other formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange,that operate within the District's jurisdiction; however, financial information for these entities is not included In the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board L (GASS)Statement 14: • Each entity has an independently elected governing body. • Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. LI • The District is neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. I • Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. L Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting The District operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are L financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization)of providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. �+ Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the Flow of economic Li resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting, whereby revenues are 8 (Continued) L I V r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30.2000 and 1999 recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred. The District applies all GASS pronouncements currently in effect as well as Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements and Interpretations, Accounting Principal Board Opinions and Accounting Research r Bulletins of the Committee on Accounting Procedure issued on or before November 30, 1989. Operating Plans r Each year, District staff prepares an annual operating plan which is adopted by the Board of Directors. The annual operating plan is used to serve as a basis for monitoring financial progress, estimating the levy and collection of taxes,and determining future service charge rates. During the r year,these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operation dictate. Cash Equivalents Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. r Investments All investments are stated at fair value (the value at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation " sale). Accounts Receivable " Accounts receivable are shown net of the allowance for uncollectibles which were $92,560 and $133,323 at June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Any unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year-end. r Inventory Inventory is slated at cost,which approximates market, on a weighted-average basis. 'r Property. Plant and Equipment Outlays for property, plant, equipment, and construction in progress are recorded in the revenue area which will use the asset. Such outlays may be for individual revenue area assets or for a revenue area's share of joint assets. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor; materials; outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated Indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period. There .. were no capitalized interest costs during the fiscal years ended June 30,2000 and 1999. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The District generally follows the guidelines of estimated useful r lives as recommended in the State of California Controller's Uniform System of Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts,which range from 3 to 75 years. The following are estimated useful lives for major classes of depreciable assets: Sewage collection facilities—50 years, Sewage treatment r facilities —40 years, Sewage disposal facilities —40 years, and General plant and administrative facilities— 11.5 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged directly to contributed facilities. r (Continued) 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 Amortization Amortization of the excess purchase price over the book value of assets acquired is provided using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 30 years. u Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to Interest expense over the respective terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates(note 4). Restricted Assets Ir Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates of participation,joint treatment works expansion, and capital expenditures for improvements. 6W Interest Rate Swaps The District enters into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of certificates of participation as part of an overall financing program. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap I agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are defamed and amortized to V Interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements. Compensated Absences The District's employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation V and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and 560 hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused,respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave" at a rate of between 60 and 200 6. hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the accompanying financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences." In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the District assumes that all employee's accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out at 35 percent of the ending balance. it Claims and Judgments The District records estimated losses, net of any insurance coverage under Its self-insurance program (see Self-Insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been incurred and when the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable includes an estimate for incurred but unreported claims. V Property Taxes Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. V The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the District in Installments during the year. Property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance current operations. 4 The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy texas at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The District receives a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 period. (Continued) 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 Self-Insurance Plans For the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, the District was self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $300 million for fire, r flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is $100,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, to a maximum of $15 million, with outside Insurance coverage to $50 million per occurrence. The District also maintains outside r comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The District is substantially self-insured for general liability coverage with a $100,000 self-Insured deductible, but has excess general liability coverage to $25 million per occurrence. During the past three fiscal years there have been no r settlements in excess of covered amounts. There were no significant changes in insurance coverage during the fiscal years ended June 30,2000 and 1999. Claims against the District are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are r charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. District management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 2000 that would materially affect the financial position of the District. Contributed Equity Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect. Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. Deferred Compensation Plan The District offers its employees a defamed compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the District to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until r termination, retirement, death or for unforeseeable emergency. The assets of the plan are held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. Since the plan assets are administered by an outside party and are not subject to the claims of the District's general creditors, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 32, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans, the plan's assets and liabilities are not included within the District's financial statements. Eliminations and Restatements Al fiscal year 1999-00 and 1998-99 Inter-district receivables and payables have been eliminated r and are not reported within the June 30, 2000 and 1999 combined financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year data to conform to the current year presentation. r r (Continued) 11 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 (2) Cash and Investments The District follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held by fiscal agents. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments Is allocated to the various funds based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest Income from cash and investments of funds excluded from pooled cash and investments is credited directly to the related fund. V Deposits Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation. The California Government v Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by pledging government securities equal to 110% of the Deposits or by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes equal to 150%of the deposits. L+ Deposits are categorized herein, In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASS) Statement No. 3, to give an Indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at ,— year-end. 1 W Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the District or by its agent in the District's name. Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or L agent in the District's name. Category 3- Uncollateralized or collateralized but the pledged securities are not held in the District's name. W Investments Statutes authorize the District to invest in obligations of the U.S. Government, state and local governmental agencies, negotiable certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances, commercial paper, reverse repurchase agreements, and a variety of other investment instruments which are allowable under the California Government Code section 53600 at seq. Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASS Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the District at year-end. Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the District or its agent in the District's name. W Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institution's trust department or agent in the District's name. Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institution's trust department or agent but not in the District's name. The District invests in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on r deposit as a result of outstanding checks. At June 30,2000, the District's total demand cash bank balance amounted to $3,017,189, of which $2,640,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. W Investments Not Subject to Categorization Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County t.. Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASS Statement No. 3 does not require (Continued) W 12 W r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 categorization of investment pools managed by another government. Also cash held by trustees are not categorized because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open-ended mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the District r who are acting in accordance with agreements entered Into with the District. Al such investments are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by the GASB. The District is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated r by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the District's investment in this pool is reported In the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the District's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAW for the entire LAW portfolio(in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. The management of LAW has indicated to the District that as of June 30,2000 the amortized cost of the pool was $43,276,450,234 and the fair value of the pool r was $43,227,355,507. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities, and floating rate securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored enterprises,and corporations. r A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30,2000, is categorized as follows: June 30,2000 Canvina Amount Bank r Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Cam Demand cash accounts $ (1,563.546) 377,189 2 Bank Investment Contmcts- -with Chase Bank - 4.480.373 4,48D,373 3 r -with State Street Bank 23.2,27,000 23,227,000 3 Total Deposits (1,563,546 27,707.373 28n8a 5e Investments: r Repurchase agreement 2,640,000 - 3 Cash and Investments with LAIF 7,510,162 5,011.681 N/A Cash and investments with OCIP 2,059 - N/A U.S.Government Securities 122.247,371 81,578,103 1 r Commercial Paper 35,001,477 23,357.183 1 Corporate Bonds 74.365,995 49,619.235 1 Mutual Funds 381,892 254,844 N/A Cash and Investments r held with fiscal agents: Mutual funds 4,451,980 N/A Total Investments 242,138.958 164,273.026 r Total Carrying Amount $240 F75410 191 GRfI V99 Cash and cash equivalents and Investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: r Cash and cash equivalents $ 59,504,895 47,485,209 Investments 181,070.515 144,495,190 r Although the bank investment contract with State Street Bank is classed as category 3, the depositor,AG Matched Funding Corporation, is required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt r securities of AG fall below a S&P rating of"AA-"or below a Moody's rating of"Aa3". r (Continued) 13 r 1 6W ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements y June 30,2000 and 1999 i At June 30, 2000, the U.S. Government Securities investments included mortgage-backed V securities totaling $163,644,796, and the U.S. Government Securities and Corporate Bond investments included Floating-rate notes totaling$74,838,676. A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 1999, is categorized as follows: V June 30 1999 Camino Amount Bank r, Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Cates Demand cash accounts $ (414,202) - 310,889 2 Bank Investment Conlracls- -w8h Chase Bank - 4,482,935 4,482,935 3 1r -with State Street Bank 23,227,000 23,227,000 3 Total Deposits (414,202 1 27,709,935 28 020.A2a Investments: Repurchase agreement 658,000 - 3 Cash and investments with tAIF 14,770,093 8,345.691 WA _ Cash and investments with OCIP 6,073 3.770 WA U.S.Government Securities 133,175,696 75,249,572 1 60 Commercial Paper 6.210,824 3,509,363 1 Corporal:Bonds 65,304,394 36,899,580 1 _ Mutual Funds 266.641 150,606 WA I , Cash and investments 69 held with fiscal agents: Mutual funds 4,447,184 NIA _ Total Investments 220,392,221 128,605,766 1 Total Carrying Amount $219 97A 019 i5R 314701 64 Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $ 21,101,780 14,994,859 Investments 198.876.239 141,320.842 $219 AAA n� i5R 31S701 i L At June 30, 1999, the U.S. Government Securities investments included mortgage-backed securities totaling $62,361,449, and the U.S. Government Securities and Corporate Bond investments included floating-rate notes totaling$38,441,361. y At June 30, 1999, the District's total demand cash bank balance amounted to $968,889, of which $658,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. u The management of LAW has Indicated to the District that as of June 30, 1999, the amortized cost of the pool was$36,849,505,673 and the estimated fair value of the pool was$36,801,515,428. v (3) Property. Plant. Equipment and Construction in Procress Property,plant, equipment, and construction in progress,at cost, at June 30, 2000 and 1999 are as follows: 6w L 14 (Continuer) L t ' W r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 'J June 30,2000 Revenue Treatment Collection June 30, 1999 Area Plant Facilities Total Total Property, plant, and eouipment: 1 $ 89,758,173 $ 7,054.233 $ 96,812,406 $ 93,948,749 ,r 2 245,349.734 98,486,115 343.835.849 330,716,751 3 252,527,577 81,315.597 333,843,174 312,702,763 5 32,751,926 39,483,645 72,235,571 66,078,348 6 32.009,560 12,165,660 44,175,220 34,269,229 7 86.953,269 46,180,331 133,133,600 124,267,399 11 49,251,414 27,136,980 76,388,394 70,239,233 13 10,642,222 3,175,032 13,817,254 12,499,101 r 14 26,015,289 28,754,510 54,769,799 45,734,209 Subtotal 826,259,164 343,752,103 1,169,011,267 1.090,465,782 r Construction in progress: 1 10,542,057 75,060 10,617,117 10,902,116 r 2 27,493,731 2,736,902 30,230,633 29,964,738 3 27,450,780 16,262,522 43,713,302 40,238,933 5 3,908,696 876,690 4,785,386 8,921,142 6 3,302,553 191,625 3,494,178 9,899,847 7 8,314,562 1,566,448 9,881,010 12,204,192 11 4,889,092 3,810,052 8,699,144 13,291,162 13 900,115 - 900,115 835,164 r 14 2,216,676 1,762 2,218,438 4,711,519 Subtotal 89,018,262 25,521,061 114,539,323 130,968,813 a, Total $914,277,426 $369,273,164 $1,283,550,590 $1,221,424,595 (4) Lonc-Term Debt The following is a summary of the changes in long-term debt for the year ended June 30,2000: Balance Balance r July 1, 1999 Additions Deletions June 30,2000 Arbitrage payable $ 303,500 $ - $ - $ 303,500 Compensated absences 3,237,800 329,100 - 3,566,900 Claims and judgments payable 1,463,316 168,000 625,316 1,006,000 Certificates of participation 374,135.000 12,880,000 361,255,000 ,r Totals $379,139,616 $497,100 $13,505,316 $366,131.400 r (COntinued) 15 r 1,+ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 Arbitrace Pavable The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act) substantially revised the treatment to be afforded to the earnings on the proceeds of tax exempt debt and requires the District to calculate and remit rebatable arbitrage earnings to the Internal Revenue Service. Certain of the District's debt and interest earnings on the proceeds thereof are subject to the requirements of the Act. The District's liability at June 30,2000 is$303,500. u Compensated Absences The District's policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources. The District's liability at June 30,2000 Is$3,566,900. Claims and Judgments Payable V The District is self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1. The following is a summary of the claims and judgments payable as of June 30,2000 and 1999: - 1999-00 1998-99 V Claims and judgments payable at July 1 $1,463,316 $1,432,011 Claims Incurred during the fiscal year 168,000 619,588 Payments on claims during the fiscal year (625,316) (588,283) Claims and judgments payable at June 30 1,006,000 1,463,316 Less: current portion (519,470) (525,428) u Total long-tens claims and judgments payable $ 486.530 $ 937,888 Certificates of Participation The District issues certificates of participation in order to finance construction of the treatment facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate Interest in the semi- W annual interest payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available funds of the District. All of the District's certificates of participation are 26-year issues except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issue. W Certificates of participation at June 30,2000 are summarized as follows: 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation $ 83,300,000 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation 18,695,000 r' 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 80.200,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 129,110,000 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 43,950,000 rl Total certificates of participation payable 361,255,000 - Less: current portion (13.790,000) Less: unamortized discount (1,319,408) �+ Total long-term certificates of participation payable $346,145,592 W 16 (Continued) W r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 1986 Certificates of Participation On August 13, 1986, District Numbers 1,2 and 3 completed the sale of$117,000,000 of certificates of participation. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was r refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation(see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. r 1990.1992 Series A Certificates of Participation On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 was 3.12%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate Irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000, unless terminated earlier. The District has the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium. `tl 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Particioation On May 1, 1991, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$117.555,000 of r certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average Interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 was 5.9%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were Issued with an original issue discount of$3,731,496. r The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of 54,480,373 is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2). In addition, Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond r insurance for the certificates. On December 3,1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of r Participation(see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. On September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see r below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation On September 1, 1992, District Numbers 1,2,3, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98,500,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 was 3.13%. r Annual principal payments are due August 1,beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,860,000.which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank,the trustee(note 2). r December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation On December 3, 1992, District Numbers 1,2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$160,600.000 r of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted (Continued) stl 17 V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements r, June 30,2000 and 1999 i by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due v August 1,beginning August 1, 1993. On October 1, 1992,the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55%and receive a variable Interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of$160.600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge,and the associated Interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest Lr rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 20- year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013. The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 V certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly,the trust account assets and the liability for the r defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt still outstanding at June 30, 2000 was$129,110.000. V The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$13,377,000 is being held by State Street Bank,the trustee (note 2). In addition,AMBAC provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. September 1993 Refundino Certificates of Participation On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1, 2,3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1995. 6W On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56% and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is v accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2016. The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for W all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the District's combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, u 2000 was approximately$43,950.000. Annual Amortization Requirements The annual requirements to amortize all debt related to certificates of participation as of June 30, 2000,including interest payments of$199,702,696, are as follows: W 18 (Continued) W r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 r Year Certificates Ending of June 30, Participation 2001 $ 34,738,246 2002 34,570,664 ,r 2003 34,931,4D4 2004 35,154,005 2005 35,368.120 Thereafter 386,195,257 r Total $560,957,896 (5) Contributed Equity r The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the years ended June 30. 2000 and 1999,respectively: r Capital Amortization Contributions of Excess Connection from Purchase r Fees Capital Irvine Ranch Price Over Revenue Balance at Earned Replacement Water District Book Value Balance at Area No. July 1 (Expensed) Charges (note 7) (note T) June 30 ,r Fiscal Year Endino June 30.2000 1 $ 6,186,713 $ 198,944 $ 493,851 $ - $ - $ 6,879.508 2 59,324,344 3,106,664 1.324,276 - - 63,755,284 r 3 37,818,288 1,741,121 1,372,358 - - 40,931,767 5 15,008,780 102.942 180,195 - - 15,291,917 6 5,548,524 50,690 164,917 - 5,764,131 7 19,395,002 1.384.776 462,396 - - 21,242,174 11 14,840,966 593,698 290,289 - - 15.724,953 13 9,171,993 687,919 53,025 - - 9,912.937 14 78,982,361 152,335 95,285 (657,709) 78,672,272 r Totals $ 246,276,971 $ 7,866,754 3 4,493,642 $ 95,285 $ (657,709) $ 258,074,943 Fiscal Year Ending June 30.1999 r 1 $ 5,953,135 $ 233,578 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,186.713 2 55,108,447 4,074,689 141,208 - - 59,324,344 3 35,084,213 2,734,075 - - - 37,818,288 5 14.830.543 178,237 - - - 15,008,780 r 6 5,450,716 97,808 - - - 5,548,524 7 18,663,660 741,342 - - - 19,395,002 11 14,532,189 308,777 - - - 14.840,966 r 13 8,036,818 1,135,175 - - - 9,171,993 14 83,503,679 (752,807) (3,110,802) (657,709) 78,982,361 Totals $ 241,153,400 $ 8,750.874 $ 141,208 $ (3,110,802) $ (657,709) $ 246,276,971 (Continued) 19 r Yn1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements L June 30,2000 and 1999 (6) Pension Plan L The District participates in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System (OCERS), a cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan which is governed and administered by a nine member Board of Retirement. OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death, disability, and cost-of-living benefits. OCERS issues a stand-alone comprehensive annual financial j report which can be obtained from OCERS at 2223 Wellington Avenue, Santa Ana, California V 92701. The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was$28,494,778 for the year ended June 30, 2000; $28,726,693 for the year ended June 30, 1999; and $27.943,478 for the year ended June 30, 1998. The Districts total payroll was $32,781,881 in 2000; $32,675,487 in 1999; and $29,684,325 in 1998. Benefits All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who retire at or after age 50 with ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement allowance is based upon the member's age at retirement,the member's "final compen- sation"as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. Contributions i As a condition of participation under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 6" 1937, members are required to contribute a percentage of their annual compensation to OCERS. Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%-7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%, respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The District is required to make periodic kW contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they retire. The contribution requirement for the years ended June 30, 2000, 1999, and 1998 were $3,123,312, $3,576,050, and $2,684,493, respectively. This total contribution consisted of$2,301,017 from the District and $822,295 from employees in 2000; $2,729,376 from the District and $846,674 from employees in 1999; and $1,889,570 from the District and $794,923 from employees In 1998. The Districts V contributions represented 8.1%, 9.5%, and 6.8% of covered payroll and employee contributions represented 2.9%, 2.9%, and 2.8% of covered payroll for the years ended June 30, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The District's contributions for the years ended June 30, 2000, 1999, and 1998 represented 4.26%, 3.98%, and 2.9% of total contributions required of all participating entities, respectively. (7)Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District Revenue Area No. 14 The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the V Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD")as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per L+ day), together with a pro-reta interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. (Continued) I 20 V LI ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of $19,979.000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful fives of the joint assets of District r No. 14. As of June 30, 2000, $9,207,926 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually "tl fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement, which net contribution amounted to $95,285 in 2000 and $(3,110,802) in 1999 (see note 5). The contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. Revenue Area No.5 IRWD has entered into an agreement with the District to provide funding to Revenue Area No. 5 for the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal facilities to be used by IRWD (the "Downcoast Agreement"). No new funding occurred in 2000 or ,r 1999. The agreement also provides that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees related to development in the Downcoast Area(as defined in the Downcoast Agreement). (8)Seoment Information r The District consists of nine revenue areas which provide sewerage services and are financed primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the revenue areas, in thousands of dollars, r are as follows for the years ended June 30,2000 and 1999: 2000 Depreciation Net r Property and Operating Net Changelo Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense (Loss) (Loss) Capital r 1 $ 2,246 $ 9,006 $ 3,216 $ (178) $ (824) $ 693 2 10,809 26,003 10.358 (2,951) 1,395 4,431 3 11,873 24,627 10,360 (2,693) 3,718 3,113 r 5 3.318 3,048 2,050 (1,538) 971 283 6 1,391 4,182 1,436 428 1265 216 7 3,404 8,269 3,792 (1,648) (216) 1,847 11 2,515 5,203 2.744 (1,933) (728) 884 13 1 1,169 334 49 47 741 14 130 2,093 (3,697) (1,389) (410) r Total $ 35,557 $ 81,637 $ 38,383 $ 14,161 $ 4239 $ 11,798 r r (Continued) 21 r 1� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30,2000 and 1999 Net Total Assets Due From Due to Additions (Including Due Oilier Other Net Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity 1 $ 3,405 $ 86,111 $ 1,548 $ 9,103 $ (2,585) $ 45,106 $ 29,807 2 13.312 391,223 7,041 2,011 71,744 118,411 264,783 3 26,051 391,436 4,931 2,234 91,605 112,721 270,733 L 5 2,304 88,178 547 653 16,089 20,035 66,724 6 2,968 63,678 5,026 2.030 21,171 15,419 45,615 7 6,052 126,378 466 4,362 18,827 24,702 95,638 11 3,389 90,236 5,363 4,315 20,944 22,912 61,477 13 1,048 25,510 148 1,005 8,115 283 24.016 14 4,713 63,865 2,660 2,017 1,861 1,666 69,740 Total $ 63.242 $ 1,326,615 $ 27,730 $ 27.730 $ 247,771 $ 361,255 $ 918,533 L 1999 w Depreciation Net Property and Operating Net Changeto Revenue Tax Operating Amortization Income Income Contributed V Area No. Revenue Revenue Expense Loss (Loss) Capital 1 $ 2,094 $ 6,865 $ 4,090 $ (2,830) $ (2,098) $ 234 2 10,085 22,409 12,549 (7,154) 2,912 4,216 u 3 10,976 22,544 12,385 (5,615) 6,249 2,734 5 2,903 2,734 2,242 (2,039) 1,219 178 6 1,337 3,730 1,424 164 1,964 98 7 3,164 6,120 4,585 (4,443) (1,138) 741 u 11 2,277 4,318 2,708 (2,024) 649 309 13 - 1,072 424 66 682 1,135 14 84 2.065 (3,417) (2,048) (4,521) v Total $ 32,836 $ 69.876 $ 42,492 $ (27,292) $ 8,391 $ 5,124 Net Total Assets Due From Due to y Additions (Including Due Other Oilier Net Revenue to Fixed from Revenue Revenue Revenue Working C.O.P. Total Area No. Assets Areas) Areas Areas Capital Payable Equity V 1 $ 4,052 $ 89,518 $ 840 $ 10,899 $ 589 $ 46,706 $ 29,939 2 12,341 389,481 6,768 2,063 57,565 122,772 25B,956 3 14,673 390,080 4,885 3,321 92,841 116,606 263,902 5 4,318 89,879 299 1,D41 15,482 20,884 65.469 6 4,513 62,214 4,865 991 23,835 15,922 44,134 7 5,480 127,310 466 5,765 13,995 25,604 94,006 11 (242) 90,784 2,565 4,665 9,210 23,633 61,322 y 13 757 24,419 148 747 1.985 292 23,228 14 1,343 66,736 10,193 1,537 8,778 1.716 61,539 Total $ 44,549 $ 1,330.421 $ 31,029 $ 31,029 $ 224,283 $ 374,135 $ 902,495 u 22 (Continued) w W ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT s+ Combined Financial Statements June 30, 2000 and 1999 (9)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures Revenue Area No. 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 2000 and 1999 of $18,832.474 and $17,443,183, respectively. This deficit is expected to be eliminated by revised service charges in future years. (10)Loss on Investment in Orange County Pool On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) collectively filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. At the time,the District had$454,291,774 on deposit In the OCIP. r On May 2, 1995, the Bankruptcy Court approved a "Comprehensive Settlement Agreement between the County, the OCIP,and a majority of the OCIP participants, including the District. The District recovered bankruptcy settlements totaling $431,297,127 between May 1995 and the final settlement distributions in February and March of 2000. The remainder of $22,994,647, or 5.1 percent of the original deposit,was recorded as a loss in the fiscal year ended June 30,2000. (11)Subsequent Event On August 31, 2000, the District issued $218.60 million Series 2000 Refunding Certificates of Participation for the following reasons: 1)to currently refund all of the outstanding principal amount of the 1990-92 Series A ($80.5 million) and Series C ($83.8 million) variable rate Certificates of Participation, 2)to advance refund all of the outstanding principal amount of the 1990-92 Series B ($15.395 million) fixed rate Certificates of Participation, and 3) to finance or reimburse the acquisition, construction and installation of additional Improvements to the wastewater system. The net proceeds of the issuance amounted to $217.42 million after payment of $1.18 million in underwriting fees, Insurance, and other issuance costs. Of the net proceeds, $32.67 million were used to reimburse Improvements to the wastewater system and $17.31 million were deposited into a reserve fund. The remaining net proceeds of $167.44 million together with $14.36 million of 1990-92 Series A, B,and C Certificates of Participation sinking fund monies were used to purchase U.S. government securities. $15.87 million of those securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 1990.92 Series B Certificates of Participation and $165.93 million were deposited into installment payment accounts to provide for all principal and interest payments on the 1990-92 Series A and C Certificates of .d Participation. As a result, the 1990-92 Series A, B, and C Certificates of Participation are considered to be defeased, and the related liability will be removed from the Districts financial statement in the fiscal year ending June 30,2001. The refundings resulted in a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt of $1.32 million (Series A), $.61 million (Series B), and $1.82 million (Series C). These differences will be amortized as part of operations using the straight-line method through the year 2015(Series A),2004(Series B),and 2017(Series C). The Series 2000 Refunding Certificates of Participation were issued to levelize the District's aggregate net debt service, modernize bond legal documents, place all certificates of participation .. on a single lien, and to better accommodate future financing needs. The Series 2000 Certificates of Participation are expected to generate gross cashfow savings of $1.78 million and all-in net present value savings of $1.23 million, based on an assumed all-in rate of 4% (except for the portion relating to the Series B refunding, which has been swapped to a fixed rate of 4.512% from August 30, 2000 through August 1,2001). r 23 r u u u u u u u (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) u I u 1u W Iu W u u 24 J J rj ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS i JI J J J i �I J ..i J 25 J ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Commelrp Bananas aMa1 June X.201011 WIIII Condemned Toggle Yr June 30,ION Feet. Reyemre R... R.-. R.. Reremre Revenue Revanee Revenue Ellavem" TOWS Mawl Maa No.2 And N..3 Ares No.5 Mee Np.6 Ma No.T Mee No.11 An.N013 Am Na.14 EnN9, 20N 19N Cemm Mew: Cet9 and Mtn edulyaleme S 1.OM.1011 S 15A84A32 S 21.SN.3T2 S 3.958,510 's 4A05AN S 5,40,11,11,811 S 4,W1,818 S 2198,204 E E S NAw.NS E 21.101,780 ImeaWenb 3,1225T5 48.3X10 N.BX652 12.045.656 13,404,= IQ9N,Bw 15,147,25E 8.BB2.9M 181.010,616 1N,BM,2N Recolacialiges: Accaont. 777,515 2.331,742 1.041.687 219,9M 340,9011 530A19 407,0N 10.2N 107,229 6,N8M8 3.BN,091 Auauddlmaeal 017.816 1,471.726 1.=094 173.00 183101 450,6104 M9279 BTAW 1N,747 4,812,1N 4A29,7N Guetmmaner. Rev¢neeam. I.9M,44o 7,040,409 4.01.272 S47=5 5.028.338 485,BM 5,362,480 148,169 2,660,149 (27,TXN2) (iaamnenetl Mantes 1,0115.947 tAXwT Tdbd rewYebY. 2.BN.111 10,1143,1411, 0,01 3 94016811 6.5M.w6 1.448.502 8A21.014 214.I75 4.003,072 121.Y10]42) 12,NA675 8,378.916 InvenlwlN 489.2215 11506,910 1.4M.3N 177MI 18TAM 461.3M 2w.4N M47 143,N0 4,722.3M 4.817.5441 PrepeldnWareorusels X9N 212.N8 N0.821 NAM 211,425 (11 31218 9,717 N.1N M5,618 813,0N TOW cement...eY 7A10,T00 X7wAN 9B,8N.8N 11.147.221 2"714N 241mm n,454,1119 9,M2.SN 4,166.3N 127.TM.N2) 253.2011,979 MABOBAN Reelected estate: Caelr MdcaaNa9clvtlenb 2.726,603 18ANA11 12.814AN 4.196.3412 1,711.6N 2,541 1.701.075 1,438.8111 1.908.627 47,485.M9 14.984.859 Inva9nnant. 41.3271m 58,400A37 XN5.NB I9.787.21ID %M.573 7.11001 5.419,724 4,3111.445 5,001,714 1M.4N.1M l41,=J142 RacoNaOlae: Asseed Inbreed fi3,MT 196.m ITI,wB M29 1O.W1 "AM 14,696 - $XBO3 521,253 Cannacum lees - 461,BE8 162,M3 13,TET MA39 - 33,w11 - f,e52,2112 1A27,M Other 53.51`2 M5.541 3N.TN 07A50 39.182 92.7M 60.022 069,157 NS,T56 TolelrnaevdNas 1W,1210 955,485 Ili 120,424 49.353 SAMO 81.51E W,BM 2,646A41 105AM TOItlmtYcled,cteY 11A00AM T mum 51AM.320 17ANA44 Slee 1 10.8711405 1.242AI7 5A60,074 1.1,09,401 1w,525A40 I59.121424 Gue Lam odes,9ovemman.1 agencies.noncurrent X3Xw0 Oalenedc0ogea MAN 913.BW No.M$ 617W 74AN 115At12 119A21 578 3AN I.M9AN IA45AM PmpenXPlentend a.O.nl,al W at: lnM MAE!, 2,M6,347 2,11113.255 365,905 M .132 2,3M.3941 MAN 98,144 508.403 - 10,3N,N8 7.140.014 BeweBe wlleGbn ledllllec 0.101.016 10%MTAN MAMA 4 40.162.385 12.825,428 48,822,Mo 20.162.779 200.705 M,3T8,30T - 357.1w,3W SISASJ,M1 S.,"..act NOR". BS,2N,180 17A47.w3 10,677,6N 23,828,354 23,263.07 63.242.673 N.W1,514 7A40IM7 IB,M .791 - 500,0,15,285 674,0417A70 $.,a dlapoml lec010aa 9,aw,3N 26,1101.350) 27,51N.061 3.00,406 3.491 91497.554 6,378,40 1,161,094 2,808,226 901N,851 011A94A15 Gde...IpldntdnE edminYaativa(ac,Nies 11.730.1142 W.I24,541 M,159,SN 4.298."1 4,276.M5 11.416,170 8.435,483 4,5N,984 3.333.9M - 111,3N.203 Inwo. 92 Comructo.0pm9reat 10,017.117 X23O.M 4%7163N 4.1X3M 3.49N.IM 901,010 O'si M N0115 2,218,4218 114.09.3N IW, 13 TOYIpmpny, nnl eMeOWpcenl 107,420,N3 374AN.M2 W1,6X41`6 77.020.967 47.6M.3N 143.014,610 85.01 14,717,M MON,237 1AB3,6M,N0 1,221,424.9116 payrmuYNtl demacYlYn (446NA70) (IW,121,410) OX271.2N) (X295,737) (141TW,8M) (162A10.8971 (28.906AN) NA54,N8) (15,815.848) (4M.38 OM (41105.2144) Net Mix dy,plant aedece'reanl N.eM.OM 230,945,072 241,2115,214 53.725,220 32,031,TBB 90.01,713 55,161,676 10A62A03 41JUXI BM,181,910 803 W51 E.wee WrcBaea price ever6wk v acywed aeded.wl. 10.771,074 10.n1,074 11A2870 OlMremab,M.N.I. eccumWeUd emoNzatIon 351.1913 9M4M 1.010,198 131.797 12e809 W1706 i9i 42.826 103.570 3A59,819 1ANAN Toleluseb E NA10771 S N122J3T5 E 39LM5,NT s N,9T.466 S M,Eie,006 s Iz6.Wa.1M s N.236,4N S 26AN]M S M.Ns.t4z 3 IZTAM.t421 S 1,N6.ew,6I6 s f.2NAM.t92 ICprdlaus0) 26 C_ C [ [ [ C [ [ I . [ [ I S _ f.._. _. e e [ [ t t e e e t e e e e e e e e t ORANOE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Cpm5lnln Balance Shod(Cnunu W) June m,Mm WI0 Cwnynllw Total.br Jun 30.1909 NwalMa Rnnue Ronne Revenue Remnu. R.venue R.. Rovene Revenue Ellminelbg TNeN pree W.I Ara.No.2 Mee W.3 Mee No.5 Mae W.a AMe No.) Am.W.11 Am W.13 Anna]M 14 Eno" 2000 Im Ou"m Ilebllllln p".bb Imm mnl ueW: c Acc.unt.,101e S 6W.6B5 f 1213.08E S 1".652 E 2m,406 $ 20],44) S $04,002 E 803,730 E 71.552 E 103,338 S f 6.307.5M E S.W8,462 A.Cpetl.pone 427.651 1,317,217 1.244.165 165.210 103,678 40,205 mm" M.M 125,DM - OV.913 2,704182 Oueto Nh.u.nm.rees O,1m,Tm 2,010810 2,224,278 632,6W 2,Om297 4.331,579 4.815,3m tA05.T7 2,017,120 (27,730,M) TObl..M uabWlNs p lghn Imm cumnl one" 10,m5.2m 5,W1,112 5,20,085 1,O820 2,401,722 5,329,0]) 5,510,2W 1,137ABS 2.30SW0 12),)30,2121 10,435.6W O.NN,W4 Lu . IIeb1161ests: Irom renN olftn.N: I.W..I a bl.Ble 39741 71,4W 451.498 144501 00.n2 3eA99 2R0) 4,7 1132g 4I4A3 2.220,28E InbmlyeW0le B16,05 1,0 .740 1A80,721 235.897 t00.W6 x12,2B0 139,O4 1,08 6,329 4,411,W3 4,313,70 Cepnlb 18,12 89.140 60,]21 8,80) 8A17 BB,6W B.Sm 2.2B0 4,118 201,M7 2,830,W3 CWmoeMl le pryable,aununtmnlpoNon 53A17 183.704 IW,S68 1O,632 20,833 m.132 M,OM ],SW 13,i1 619,00 628,42E Ce0io,,Wounood pellet pey.ble.cuneM pwLbn 1p10,031 4.050,909 1,17,024 901,01 346.029 9O1,016 181.580 8,6M EB.OM 13,IBO.Om 12Am.Om ToldamMN61111Ns p W.Ire. re.0NN0neeN 2,492640 5,05,177 5,937,617 1,172,102 BB]AB1 1,388,718 981,143 25.1M M212 19A14AM 22,TMAm Logy-NetllablllOn: c.mpen.bk.bnnae 3m.8m 1.136Am 1,075,100 imam 141Am WS,Sm IOO,MO 52.W0 IMWO 3,6W,9m 3.23T,600 Gelm..]AluOonlnla payable, Inw "YoNo on 0,105 114,810 10,W1 10,294 I2.910 8,,SW 21,248 i.IW 14,742 486,Sm M31 M Ar0laeBe payable W,RM it<,810 10,E70 10,]d0 2,910 8,260 3.W0 � - 309,SM m3.6M CeM6nNenoncurnootw peyebb,nncumM pMbn, n..d revenunu 432d0AW 113A ,118 35,W) 1W ,BM 18,m0.010 N.BIO.6O0 23,W7.W7 22,036,BM 8m 2]x,1E) 1,e0x, W8.115.693 3W,BW,934 ONemtl e mAm Tolel bole.11ebllWn 41714.703 114f744,240 19A19.215 19,223,144 14,9)4,M 24042.141 22,M7,6m mt.m1 1,R6.592 3W.60x.522 304,414,230 T.W II.b010as MAN,= 126.MOA35 I20.]52.81] 21.453,645 18.00,207 30,740.338 M}0,003 1.483.088 4.1H.W4 C7.)30,242) 380,352.10 398m7.Bm FutW ebu18n Conitlbulee.01.1 0,679,508 83,755RW 40.931.767 13.201,917 6}64,131 21.242.174 15.7m.953 9,912,937 )BA)2,272 2M.074,043 248.278.971 Retained emnlnW (accumulNetl 0ewt) 22,927,804 201,027AM 228.BO1,253 51.432.MB mAmAm 74.395AM 45.752A70 14.102.90 (10.02.4)41 MAST.WS B4,218,2W TNNimM.0ully 29.607A02 254AE2A40 2M,7E3,0M W.TM923 45,614]01 95,637,SM 01.4)).423 24.010.897 m.)m2W 9IB.332.570 902,495,227 TN.10.M.,and fund -sully S W.110,))1 S 391.223.213 f 391A38.BJ) E B81)i.18 E m.0MA09 S 1M.3)B.1M f BO.2M,4M E 25,mB,Tm S W.BW.142 f fx].130.RI21 S 12BEAW,IS f 1.289AB3,18) 27 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combins9 Statement of Revenues.Expenses.and Chingos In Retalnad Earnings For the Year Ended Juns 30.2000 With Comperellve Totals for June M.1909 Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Rw.nue Rdrenuem R.renue Revenue Revenue Total. Area No.1 Area No.2 Area No.3 Area No Are.No Area No.T Area No.11 Mee M.13 Mee No.14 mw 1999 Gperaling rBVB0e08: Service oher0ee S 8,936,323 $ MAIMS S 24.626.674 $ 3,0,11M S 4,112,880 $ 8.210.664 S 6,168,622 S 1,161,60 S 125,51e S 81,240.958 9 69,452,185 Permit and Inspection teas 69.669 121.90 9g940 4.MS 9,4M 49.147 M,M 1,245 4.422 39808 423,318 To.l daemons,ov .. 0,005.992 28,003,472 24,826,614 3A48,210 4.182,305 81288,811 S,202,161 1,168.892 129.939 81.631,068 69,875,603 Oparall.......Varr Men depraolalldo and arealleatsn: Collscdon aaliAtles: Salad..and Woods. 568.753 1,891,241 I.M8,452 Mms 247.169 1,012,348 648,081 52.956 189,823 6.616,110 4,811,248 Utilities - 1.298 1.086 - - 324 534 - 307 3,548 2,900 Suppllea,reps.MW m0ln.nmwe 00,528 303.946 290,041 35.822 31,150 102,095 326,562 - 29013 1.222,119 1,05.M C Inactualc.oNe. 230.716 163,307 B7,021 112,004 05,731 224,566 486,004 15,560 22,335 2,624.390 1.637.70 Olreslo.'leed 3.202 16,921 21,625 2,187 3.567 51998 1.200 2p33 1,457 03.350 74.169 Me"ags and Lining 180 1.315 1.621 136 195 330 51 129 001 4.M2 6,69 Other. 35.522 138,188 99,530 14,498 12.836 42,221 Min 4,718 9.180 311,403 4M.215 Total cdlkaAan e.tiNlles 944.901 3,114,218 2,339,381 713,935 397,248 1.387.916 1.819.593 75.4% 259,325 10.912,132 8,491,746 Treamlanl and disposal aoeelll.. Salaries and benerts 2793.551 8,604,483 8.127.205 1.013.870 1,020.504 2.634,466 1.610,G13 393,686 817.036 M.964,840 23.991,115 Made 374.763 1,154,314 1,M,285 136.013 143,611 353.421 202.573 52.814 1M.601 3.017, 01 3.317,113 Supplles.repelm and n eMenense 411A02 1.285.647 1.214,332 151A90 169.951 393.033 226.623 58,823 122.077 4.028,978 6,214,044 Contre.lu01 services 1.137.332 3,503,120 0,308,808 412,719 435.830 1.07205 614,118 160,282 33$031 10.978.131 9.074.03 Mwtln,e and raining 80,411 272.00 257,383 32.108 33,001 83.432 41,822 12.468 25.816 853,980 752,236 Other 21"M 662,063 622,261 25.838 71,728 199,513 110,931 3;381 68,162 2,0%.050 2J12i,800 Taal baeLenl Bad disposal scev6ss 5,023.080 15,482,127 14,620,2M 1,622.10 1,921,625 4.737.030 2,111.166 710,460 1,473.993 48,502,368 46.183.681 Tofe1 operating expenses carer Men depredation end en.dlsston 5,968.041 18,5%.405 16.959.661 2,536,042 2.316,173 6,124,946 4,301AN 705,955 1.133,318 59A14,M0 M.615,406 (C Mnued) 26 [ [ - t [ [ I - [ [ [ [ C ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Combining Sentient Revenues.Enthrone,sel Mann In Retained Eeminpe(Continued) For the Year Ended Juno 30.=0 With Cwnxrell.Takla far Jane 30,IM Revenx Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue RBxnue Revenue Revenue Revenue Tole. Area No.1 Area M.2 Area N.3 Anne No.5 Area No.6 Area No.] Ares No.11 Area No.13 Area No.14 2000 1999 OpaaWg lnaame(lax) before nionala8on and manambellon 3.037,951 7,407.067 7,888.953 512,220 1.863A32 2.143.065 811A02 3B2,937 (1.603,379) 22,222,559 15,20 'm DepreclalbnaMamaAnflion 3215.883 10,357.675 10,380,003 2,060.288 IA35.967 3,]92,052 2.744.333 333,671 4A35AM 35,nS.616 41.833.09 AmodkaMn otaxcxe purahxe price over bmknin on acquired ace ale, 66].]09 65).)09 65),]09 Opening Mcane(Ixs) (177,812) (2,950,11M) (2.693,050) (1.538,oBe1 427A65 (1,648,1871 (1.012,931) 49,08 (3,89 'St (14,180,766) (0,291,651) Nonapere9n9 ravenux: Property W. 2.246.787 10.800.790 11,873,666 3,317,077 1,390,942 3,403,E18 2,515.509 1.178 35.65]2B] 32,835,Bg8 Intereal 037A87 01513,962 SAM.937 1,679,458 1,13g802 1.051.516 1,280,501 588.522 3M.754 2G888,416 17,M,380 Other 46A69 212A89 222.634 38,989 30.80 238.170 38.644 15,235 1,720A76 2.571.942 3A32,066 Total non-opereling revxux 3,228233 17.535,841 18,917,07 4,936,321 2,557.271 6,293.303 3.540,654 602.936 2.053230 56.985.626 64.11RW4 Norvopere0x expenses: Interest 2391i 6,2)8,993 6,661,831 1,029,554 848.211 1,129,694 936.100 10,942 93.621 18,150,672 16,359,361 Loss on Investment In Orange Coady Pod 1.400.085 6A87.612 8.622,905 1.30.817 11008,118 2,731,673 1,884.574 02,439 337,3M 22,994,647 Other 10.8M 2R723 28.380 3,477 3,553 5,275 1,272 2.653 7),98] BBA71 Tolelnonaperelin npensee 3,875,445 13,189,328 12,BM,178 2AM.900 1,719,882 3.861.287 2,635.049 BM,853 40 .678 41=,188 MA22232 Net kcame(Ian) (824,124) 1.305,705 3.717,811 971.353 1.2".954 (210.161) (728,226) 47,348 (2,047.000) 3.581,870 8.3111,281 AddamaMallanrelated to ounkbuled xuity M7,709 86],]09 657,709 Net Increase(dearease) Inreloloodaaminx (accumulated derm10 (BM,124) 1,395,705 3.717,811 971,353 1,2M,954 (214151) (7282M) 47,MB (tAN.Ni) 4.U9,379 9,Mg000 Retained eemings(eacumulated de@IO,be9klnk9ofyeer 23752,018 199,631,751 226.003.442 50,460,653 MUSA" 74.611.671 46,480MB 14.050812 (17,443,183) M8.219,258 847,169,268 Relelnetl eemin9e(accumulated de6cit).endolyear S 22A2]AM $ M1.02T.466 S 22B,BM,253 S 51.432.OM S 39,850 NO S T4.3B5,420 S A5,]fi2,dT0 S 14,102,9w 18892 T4 S MD.4ST,635 S 860218,268 29 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT C nnblrin9 Slatemenl of Ceeh Flowe For the Year Ended June 30,2000 WIN CompalelWe Totals for June 30.1999 R num R... Re.. A.m. Revmua RevmNe Revenue Revenue R.. ECmlmlb9 Tmals Anne No.+ Alga No,2 Are.No.3 Am No.5 Area No.a Nm No.] Area N911 An.NO.13 Area No.14 EMdee 20N IM CpM1 Oewe Imm opuelln9 adlNtlea: 01mome i (IA81 f R.B .BOB) f 2Aa.O60) f (1. 400) f 121,6 S 1&8,10) f $ 40,065 E aBa, b) $ E (14.100.)0) i R7,201,6511 AdOme m.l. I OewoWme, .0pi,vilml r,. mulea: Overedatlmand.moMuuq a2+4B4T l0,}5),875 IO,EBO,WE 2,050,280 I,435,907 3,702.O52 2,144,310 3aEA7+ fAE9,6& - E6.n4e18 41A2a.Ba8 O ft,maslmmaMpa,omau, 443SB 1a03 - 2 ? 90,6,17 - 24110Mau, 14206 1,)e2541,4)70 OB - 2M956 aX654],0 Otlrermeaer,.gnN. 108 ) (31.388) 128.M1 as??) na 1a,660) - 1a0.022) (t2nl ('{B4t) - (11BAB81 - IN. ..M-In msele: Aeeuumeremlva. (201,M8) (N2.M2) (0N,302) (111,014) (1]9,)N) R3a4M1 97.101) (38.814) R4N11 RAaeA1N 21.5119- OuehamN.rmvmunerma .1ma011 (z)2,892) H4a10) (M],814) IIB1,Bn1 RA0],101) - )(140.230 (a,]p4a55) - Ouerneco w9evemmenW a8mcb6 4.In,M 1B,Sn,OB4 IB,60.02 a,054150 am]Am ].)81212 4,8N,M2 I,B)B]fi9 N10,2aB) - 84,2fi0,d8 2441W vvenlo mM0lm ..M51 114660) (m.M6t (11.1671 (atis 20u&K M,N2 - - OW,102) 1N) mrenlmes x4,11fi a6M 43,N6 1SAW e.1I5 2B.SW M,NB (10.1131 (19268) - ".216 (4MA18) Pr.(dece elMrmads 1),806 42,611 1a,55] 4958 4818 1),002 11.606 111 888 - 118,206 (606.i1B) Inwgaeew"Yebl In Ilnblllnes: A.Mememb OS,ON a)zA)0 (12Lz011 11,84RO24j (310,859) 108.8& )1BAq 24.015 82AID - (600.731 1.105,Im Amum esgmm 1a8,O1a 469,050 115 814.919 d4Bz4 51,115 413.100 8).BEa 21.522 MOO t42tn1 (2(237.21) Re,wh,5gg01e (B)A08) (204115) (Mon) (54551) (2d0,082) (W990) omiju?) (10,02]I 20.1311 - RX7.185) (21),z6B) Oemislle (14444) Oa5AM1 (186,a14) 130.N2) (24M6) Isa.eB0) 1304Bn1 BM II,u0.ne1 V9).6N) eM,49] 9gbN0ifiet Me ergs (I.ns,eB)) (52.41z) N,OeBAl4) fJae,)+1) 1,0a9,]zB (IA02,B401 (a40.e40) zsa,On 4mA10 a2w,194 - cmerYBWlllei - - - - - - - - - - Ij21a) Cialme. leeahxncm MM In,9m M,417 0.M U.6501 4%500 14m tx.021 z41a0 52B,315 +n.zm ClelmeNhdpirenN gsMale IN.1301 (1W,WN 1135.41)1 119.BW1 IM.6N1 1145i8) (n.E131 (1.N1) f4WB) IIs1,J1B1 31.N5 NNgmbroMdmaa0grellons 4.705,100 24261.082 N.952.E4 2,041799 4UNN5 0.2W.BN 2.4542M 2,317,848 6,M7.615 W.M.497 17.004,146 GM Bows Irwn nmcemlel 5nmdnp edINO ec: PlrcaeNhampregMlmm 1245,707 10.M6,79c, I1.BMAN 3,317.077 1.3M.42 1A03818 2.6161M 1,170 35A51,287 W.635,028 C shA.ham.04.1aM resume Ammer,aomMee: AodWmabpc ,,OmtmemAImeml 13.381 (13.251,714) RS.BBe,e16) (2AB7.1" (2,e15,410) 0.020.90,1) (171A04) (1.044209) (4,]048W1 (8401e,W8) (44.Ii O.W) A6aiYmabdMaasOb (32B.OW) nes,391) (017,410) 191.110) (112,908) (Wl.M2) - MAN (101ABB) R.BW,fiW) 1.911.749 Obpmededermwla - - - 114.785 - 114A66 Memel qM (2250.635) (49A,07) (5,34t,1u1 (881.)351 "A") (1.072,266) 1801.590) I8.8W) (50,223) (11,168,012) (1404,102) Pdrom g,meni.on rertlnglm of gnlggllm (I,600.119) (4.MI.353) (5.885.618) (m4B111 (60a+W) MUM (M,234) I9.500) (M.M10) - (12.M.O00) (12+05.000) %Ntlglglmenlsmiemda - - - - - (+S,M) Prrcma m ehamtapllelMlWamu 705,2W' 4,609Al2 1514113 315'. 2241W I.5ol.691 1.085.051 )26,)00 N),M 12A2436B 8A1505 eelmhumel.rc mlaleM Melm 6nendnpeNNtla (B,BBB,723) 119,8011,M) O22NAN) (3,901,310) Ia9M,N11 MAN,WB) (3.n1,377I (3M,6N) 4401,0611 (W,814149) P50.e1),30M) Gm 0q From Invealln8 acWHes: %a[eeaelromlMmle MlmedmeMe W,555,110 460AI2201 478.E82.1o1 118.05.243 !],)m,t]) 114361.M I8,807,095 4a543,000 20,4M,W1 - 1.4W,161,+Y NIA14,+62 Poidnaen imeslma w (60,0M.816) (49.7M.M) (4&2e2,6191 (++BA55,411) (81,01422Q (110,065,811) (l1.NB.224) (43.524.612) (20,018AO8) - (1,IEOAM,SW) (IM M,42a) IMemtl mo me M.616 42M.253 SAW.0M 1,MS.OB3 917.611 1,N7,016 1.064716 444IN 231.05 lesinu B 24027.84I NB14mplomdeEMINm(a9 Ime.an'MM. 2,317,910 4074)W 1),85B,3)5 1W4.875 1,581 Millis 2.614,661 4N,518 G81412) 352MA50 (10,181,600) Nmlrcreme(Leuemelm ou endgmecul.Te 2,400,I04 2UM21131 21,907A71 5,203.0a2 4,094 10 5,5544M 4.414.0)) 2,472,1108 I.MI.222 - ]O.MAM (35205,2181 Ca.h end cmeOUlreleMs.Mp ,of Mr +2625N 11A22A9 12214410 2.871.180 2.N1472 2.40,810 2.N1WB 1,162240 614405 36,O981639 ]1.181.888 Carom .hemWW.,mdelyW i 3,iBx.nB S 54.414)4B 3 341W,BB1 f 4131,312 E 4110.m8 f 4053,M1 E 4>S48B3 i 3.MM S 1.90482) f 1 IN.08 AN i 3 ".09 Nm®m AmNlln: u.mmdmo,I.*mN.m.KBwluemm.omnb f IWASS f 1.193.345 S 1.10410% f 202,7IO f 2I2.O60 E 2)0,1)4 $ 2N.M E 1213,000 8 "An f - f 3.208.380 f (5.]85.524) Bed eml mOOM. (IANO85) (0.BB]AM) MM.M) (t,]B3,B)]) Moselle) R,n1.sm (1.8N.514) (5WA39) (33),M) 30 r r- U r r r r r e r r r r r r r [ r r r r r OCS r Statistical Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000 r r r r r r r r r r r O1 fi _K A d _ M n a a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $100,000 $90.000 $80.000 r $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 - $40,000 - $30,000 $20.000 - $10,000 r 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 ■Operating Expense Orion Operating Expense r Operating Non-Operating r Fiscal Personal Maint& Depr& Total Interest Total Non- Year Services Utilities Other Amort Operating Expense Other 1 Operating 1990-91 $24,170 $5,483 $20,711 $23,520 $73.884 $9.654 $1,822 $11,476 _ 1991-92 26,757 5,920 20,416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27,950 85,766 11,799 1,250 13,049 1993-94 28,886 4,589 21,599 33,988 89,062 16,964 2,414 19,378 1994-95 29,399 3,180 27,369 34,087 94,035 23,941 826 24,767 r 1995-96 32,660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20,731 7,648 28,379 1996-97 31,523 3,744 22,851 35,284 93,402 21,237 1,497 22,734 1997-98 28,725 3,328 22,526 35,841 90,420 19,232 1,330 20,562 r 1998-99 28,809 3,320 22,546 42,492 97,167 18,359 70 18,429 1999-00 33,581 3,621 22,213 36,383 95,798 18,151 23,073 41,224 r Notes (1) - For FY 1999-00, Other Non-Operating Expense includes $22,994,647 for the loss on investment in the Orange County Investment Pool. Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. 31 r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source r (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years r S94,384 !� r $23,596 V 1990.91 199192 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995.98 1996.97 1997-98 1999-99 1999.00 ■Operating Revenue Is Non-Operating Revenue ■Contributed Capital r r Operating Revenue Non-Operating Revenue r Permit& Total Conlrib- Fiseal Service Inspection Total Property Capacity Non- utee Year Charges Fees Operating Taxes Rights Interest Other Operating Capital 1990-91 $39,712 $7,429 $47.141 $33,395 $1,172 $17,279 $3,560 $55,406 $15,683 1991.92 56,155 322 56,477 34,053 1,815 22,593 7,552 66,013 12,898 1992-93 71,568 456 72,024 31,054 2,228 27,569 3,437 64,288 9,486 1993-94 73,400 540 73,940 35,854 - 33,226 8,751 77,831 13,471 �. 1994-95 72,909 240 73,149 27,286 - 18,500 4,408 50,194 21,431 1995-96 71,362 120 71,482 29,286 - 20,209 4,224 53,718 4,209 1996-97 64,923 258 65,181 28,193 - 20,958 3,390 52,541 21,830 r 1997-98 59,517 329 59,846 31,287 - 27,897 3,283 62,467 4,785 1998-99 69.453 423 69,876 32,836 - 17,944 3,332 54,112 5,124 1999-00 81,241 396 81,637 35.557 - 20,836 2,573 58,966 11,798 r Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. r 32 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ,r Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $120.000 $100,000 $80,000 .. $80,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 r. 1990.91 1991-92 199293 199394 1994.95 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 OTotal Tax and User Fee Levy ETotal Tax and User Fee Collection Current Total Tax %of �+ Total Tax Tax and Percent of and User %of Total O/S Delinquen- Fiscal and User User Fee Levy Delinquent Fee Collection Delinquen- ties to Tax Year Fee Levy Collection Collected Collection Collection to Levy ties Levy 1990.91 $72,180 $68,841 95.37% $845 $69,686 96.54% $2,774 3.84% 1991-92 85,172 79,329 93.14 1,637 80,966 95.06 5,067 5.95 r. 1992-93 92,926 86,514 93.10 2,152 88,663 95.41 5.465 5.88 1993-94 92,728 88,335 95.26 5,722 94,057 101.43 3,255 3.51 1994-95 91,562 86,294 94.25 2,239 88,533 96.69 2.942 3.21 1995-96 91,844 90,479 98.51 586 91,066 99.15 1.710 1.86 1996-97 89,794 82.123 91.46 246 82,369 91.73 2,191 2.44 1997-98 90,953 78,861 86.71 12 78,673 86.72 3,039 3.34 1998-99 98,557 92,089 93.44 1,597 93,686 95.06 2,069 2.10 r. 1999-00 107,948 105,129 97.39 1,626 106,755 98.89 1,709 1.58 Source:Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office. 33 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property r (Dollars in Millions) Last Ten Fiscal Years 160,000 r 140.000 r 120,000 100.000 80.000 60,000 r 40.000 20.000 1990.91 1991.92 1992.93 1993�94 1994.95 1995.96 1996.97 1997-98 1998.99 1999 00 r III Secured Property Assessed Value Dunsecured Property Assessed Value r Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals r Estimated Estimated Estimated Ratio of Total Fiscal Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessedto Year Value Value Value Value Value Value EstimatedValue 1990-91 $109,048 S109,048 $3,575 $3,575 $112.623 $112,623 100% 1991-92 116,450 116,450 4,473 4,473 120.923 120,923 100 1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,587 4,687 127,197 127,197 100 r 1993-94 124,016 124,016 3,963 3,963 127.979 127,979 100 1994-95 123.525 123,525 3.871 3,871 127,396 127,396 100 r 1995-96 122,524 122,524 3,372 3,372 125,896 125.896 100 1996-97 122,304 122,304 3.247 3.247 125,551 125,551 100 1997-98 125.018 125.018 3,302 3,302 128,320 128,320 100 r 1998-99 131,295 131,295 3,394 3.394 134,689 134,689 100 1999.00 142,126 142,126 3.507 3,507 145,633 145,633 100 r r Source: Orange County Auditor- Controller's Office. 34 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Property Tax Rates- Direct and Overlapping Governments (per$100 of asessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years r Basic OCSD#11, 1958 Fiscal Year 1%Lew Bond 18R Fund Total 1990-91 1.00000 0.00015 1.00015 1991-92 1.00000 0.00012 1.00012 1992-03 1.00000 0.00013 1.00013 r 1993-94 1.00000 0.00019 1.00019 1994-95 1.00000 0.00019 1.00019 r 1995-96 1.00000 0.00018 1.00018 19W97 1.00000 0.00010 1.00010 1997-98 1.00000 0.00010 1.00010 1998-99 1.00000 0.00020 1.00020 1999-00 1.00000 0.00000 1.00000 r Source: County of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office. r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Principal Users For the Year Ended June 30,2000 r %to Total Service r Service Charge User Charges Revenue Adohr Farms $345,670 0.43% r Kimberly Clark 299,519 0.37% MCP Foods 206,067 0.25% Favorite Foods 200,503 0.25% AERA Energy 180,439 0.22% U.S. Dyeing& Finishing 151,751 0.19% r Chroma Systems 136,235 0.17% Rockwell Semiconductor 134,148 0.17% House Foods America 116.621 0.14% r Knotts Berry Farms 106 376376 0,13% ILAZLM 2.31% r Source: Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division. `+ 35 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Ratio of Annual Debt Service for r Bonded Debt to Total Expenses (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years r 60.0% 50.0% r 40.0% -- be 30.0% 1 r 20.0% r 10.0% 0.0% 199"1 1991.92 1992.93 1993.94 1994-95 10596 199697 t997-96 1996.99 1999.00 r Ratio of Debt Total Service to Total Total Debt Operating Operating Fiscal Year Principal Interest Service Expenses(1) Expenses r 1990-91 $2,396 $9,654 $12.050 $50.364 23.93% 1991-92 3,335 11,825 15,160 53,093 28.55 r 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 57,836 30.90 1993-94 11,990 16.964 28.954 55,074 52.57 1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 59,948 58.57 We 1995-96 10,180 21,298 31,478 61,752 50.97 1996-97 10.680 20.463 31,143 58,118 53.59 1997-98 11.320 20,008 31,328 54.579 57.40 Ma 1998-99 12,120 18,475 30,595 53.089 57.63 1999-00 12,880 17,169 30,049 59,415 50.57 r Notes (1)- Exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense, r r Source:Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. 36 r We ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Bond Coverage (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years 5.00 4,50 --- - --- 4.00 - 3.50 3.00 2.50 .. 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 - 0.00. i 01990-91 01991-92 ■1992-93 ❑1993-94 ■1994-95 1111996-96 111 01997.98 01998-99 01999.00 Direct Net Revenue Gross Operating Avail. For Debt Service Reouirements Fiscal Year Revenue(1) Expenses(2) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage(3) 1990-91 $102,547 $50,364 $52,183 $ 2,396 $ 9,654 $ 12,050 4.33 1991-92 122,490 53,093 69,397 3,335 11,825 15,160 4.58 1992-93 136,312 57,836 78,476 6,075 11,799 17,874 4.39 1993.94 151,771 55,074 96,697 11,990 16,964 28,954 3.34 1994.95 123,343 59,948 63,395 9,670 25,439 35,109 1.81 1995-96 125,200 61,752 63,448 10,180 21,298 31,478 2.02 .a 1996-97 117,722 58,118 59,604 10,680 20,463 31,143 1.91 1997-98 122,313 54,579 67,734 11,320 20,008 31,328 2.16 1998-99 123,988 53,089 70,899 12,120 18,475 30,595 2.32 1999-00 140,603 59,415 81,188 12,880 17,169 30,049 2.70 Notes (1)- Including non-operating revenues. (2)- Exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense. (3) - Coverage requirements per the certificate of participation indenture agreements range from 1.0 to 1.25. The coverage rate has stabilized around 2.0 for the last six years. It is the District's policy to be in compliance with all bond covenants, and the District has the ability to raise user fees by a vote of the Board of Directors. r Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Accounting Division. 37 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt I June 30,2000 L 1999-00 Assessed Valuation(Land 8 Improvements Only). $132,511.760.582(after deducting$13,121,558,911 redevelopment incremental valuation) Overlapminm Tax and Assessment Debt (Based on redevelopment adjusted all property assessed valuation of$138,634,233,675): %Aoolicable Debt 6130/OD Orange County Teeter Plan Obligations 73.619% $ 95,943,962 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 15.192 83,497,511 L Brea-Olinde Unified School District 99,771 16,972,495 Irvine Unified School District 99.995 799,728 Santa Ana Unified School District 100. 56,320,000 1 School Districts 10D. 12,007,978 L Cities Various 11.581.275 Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement Districts Various 284,631,015 Water Districts 93.26&100. 10.375.779 Orange County Assessment Districts 100. 127,933,611 City of Irvine 1915 Act Bonds 100. 522,820.000 y City of Tustin 1915 Act Bonds 100. 70,344,000 Other City 1915 Act Bonds Various 26,019,770 Bonita Canyon Community Facilities District No.98.1 100. 45.000,000 j t Irvine Unified School District Community Facilities District No.86.1 gal 112,060,517 L Orange County Community Facilities District No.874 99.998 78,783,307 Tustin Unified School District Community Facilities District No.88.1 100. 63.915.000 Other Community Facilities Districts Various 175,366,269 Total Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt $1,794,272.215 Dime and 0,nMaomino Other Debt: %Applicable Debt 6130/00 Orange County General Fund Obligations 73.619% $ 782,860,029 Orange County Pension Obligations 73.619 222,011845 Orange County Transit District Authority 73.618 0,051:456 L Coast Community College District Certificates of Participation99.506 16,602,576 South Orange County Community College District Certificates of Participation 33.710 15,725,715 Brea-Olinda Unified School District Certificates of Participation 97.771 32,753,285 Santa Are Unified School District Certificates of Participation 100. 42,257,380 Other Unified School District Certificates of Participation Various 21,119.162 L Anaheim Union High School District Certificates of Participation 100. 27,000.000 Other High School District Certificates of Participation Various 8.188.556 School District Certificates of Participation Various 9,290,920 City of Anaheim General Fund Obligations 99.043 715,139,538 L City of Fullerton General Fund Obligations 100. 43,819,22E City of Huntington Beach General Fund Obligations 99.981 46,130,657 City of Irvine General Fund Obligations 100. 68,000,000 1 City of Santa Ana General Fund Obligations 100. 147,736,400 L Other City General Fund Obligations various 145,712,310 Orange County Sanitation Dtsmct Certificates of Participation(1) 100. 361,255,000 Irvine Ranch Water DlsNct Certificates of Participation 98.693 55,268,080 Orange County Water District Certificates of Participation 99.230 225,445,599 Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Facilities Corporation 71.033 45,674,219 Other Special Dialect Certificates of Participation 100. 2.065.000 Total Gross Direct and Owrapping Other Debt $3,042,886,729 Less: Orange County Transit District Authority(80%self-supporting) 7,241,165 Orange County Water District Certificates of Participation(100%self-supporting) 225,445,599 L City of Anaheim self-supporting obligations 668,869.446 Other City self-suppomng obligations 2,484,748 MWDOC Water Facilities Corporation(100%self-suppodin8) 45,674.219 Total Net Direct and Overlapping Other Debt $2,093,171.552 I Gross Combined Total Debt(2) $4,837,168,944 �I Net Combined Total Debt $3.887,443.767 (1) Excludes certificates of participation to be sold. (2) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes,revenue,mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and non-bonded capital lease obligations. L Ratios to: Land and Improvement All Property Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation Total Overall Tax and Assessment Debt 1.23% N/A Combined Direct Debt ($361,255,000) 0.27% 0.26% u Gross Combined Total Debt 3.65% 3,49% Net Combined Total Debt 2.93% 2.80% STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 6/30100: $29.912.936 Source: Califomla Municipal Statistics. L 38 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Demograhic Statistics r Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) Last Ten Fiscal Years r (4) (2) (3) Population Median (2) Public School (5) Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment Year (In Thousands) Income Ago (In Thousands) Rate r 1990-91 2.411 $56.380 30.4 385 5.3% 1991-92 2,512 56,346 30.4 393 6.8% 1992-93 2,557 54,380 30.4 400 6.8% r 1993-94 2.597 54,413 32.6 402 5.7% 1994-95 2,641 55,507 32.9 412 5.1% 1995.96 2,624 57,106 31.9 422 4.1% r 1996-97 2,632 59,629 32.2 443 3.2% 1997.98 2,615 60,000 30.4 458 2.9% 1998.99 2,776 61,812 31.8 471 2.6% 1999.00 2,828 (6) 32.6 483 2.9% r r Notes and Data Sources (1) -The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59% of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2) -Data Source-Center for Demographic Research,California State University, Fullerton. r (3) -Data Source-California Department of Education, Educational Demographics Unit. r (4) -Data Source-Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. (5) -Data Source-Stale of California, Employment Development Department. r (6)•Information is not curren0y available. r r 39 r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Properly Value and Construction Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) W (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years W Non- Assessed Residential Residential Property Value(2) Constr.(3) Construction(3) Total Fiscal Calendar No.of Construction Year Value Year Value Units Value Value(3) 1990-91 $ 158,342,197 1991 $ 797,469 6.569 $ 1,089,116 $ 1,886,585 1991-92 170,151,136 1992 567.121 5,943 1,032,196 1,599,317 1992-93 178,534,134 1993 496,724 6,410 1,083.716 1,580,440 1993-94 178,761,413 1994 560,558 12.644 1,745,301 2.305,859 1994-95 176,974,944 1995 582,712 8,300 1,295,297 1,878,009 1995-96 172,508,373 1996 760,809 10,207 1,528,835 2,289,644 1996-97 177,300,663 1997 1,079.687 12,251 2,007,084 3,086,771 -. 1997-98 182,284,316 1998 1,529.698 10,101 1,864,084 3,393,782 1998-99 192,625,739 1999 1,614,422 12,387 2,262,492 3,876,914 1999-00 209,136,472 2000(4) 1,818,792 11,906 2.152,072 3,970,864 L W Notes and Data Sources v (1) - The Orange County Sanitation District services 471 square miles or 59% of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2) -Data Source-Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office. r' (3) - Data Source-'The Chapman University Economic&Business Reivew." W (4) -Forecasted numbers. W W W 40 W W r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Estimated Populations of Cities Served by r the Orange County Sanitation District June 30,2000 r Population as of City January 1,2000 r Anaheim 310,700 Brea 36,950 Buena Park 77,300 Costa Mesa '106,600 Cypress 49,050 Fountain Valley 56,900 Fullerton 128.300 Garden Grove 158,300 r Huntington Beach 199,300 Irvine 144.600 Lis Habra 56,800 �. . La Palma 16,550 Los Alamitos 12,150 Newport Beach 75,600 r Orange 129,400 Placentia 50,200 Santa Ana 317,700 .. Seal Beach 27,400 Stanton 34,350 Tustin 68.300 ,r Villa Park 6,775 Westminister 87.600 Yorba Linda 63,100 Total 2,213,925 r r r r Source: Demographic Research Unit,California Department of Finance. r r 41 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Insurance in Force As of June 30,2000 6' Type Insurer Deductible Limit All-Risk Property Multiple Carriers Fire and Flood $25,000 $300 million per occurrence. Earthquake Greater of 5%per $50 million per occurrence. unit or$100,000; e+ $15 million cap Boiler&Machine ry CNA Insurance Co. $25,000 to $100 million per occurrence. $100,000 r Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance Hartford Fire and National $2,500 $1 million per loss; Union Fires Companies $4 million excess policy. Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/ v Faithful Performance v Excess General Liability Sable and American $100,000 $25 million per occurrence. Re-insurance Companies Travel &Accident Hartford Life&Accident -0- $100,000 per person; Insurance Company $500,000 aggregate for any 6' one accident. Excess Workers' W Compensation Reliance National $250,000 Statutory coverage for each Indemnity Company Each Accident aocidentleach employee. u V W Source: Orange County Sanitation District's Risk Management Office. 42 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated With Revenues and Expenses Last Ten Fiscal Years Millions of Gallons of Waste- Treatment water &Disposal Total Total Total Total Treated Cost per Operating Non-Operating Operating Non-Operating Fiscal Per Million Costs Casts Revenues Revenues Year Day Gallons (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) (In Thousands) 1990-91 269 $427.05 $73,884 $11,476 $47,141 $55,406 1991-92 227 531.28 76,439 14,230 56,477 66.013 r 1992-93 232 548.04 85,786 13,049 72,024 64.288 1993-94 231 508.03 89,062 19,378 73,940 77,831 1994-95 243 526.98 94,035 24,767 73,149 50,194 1995-96 237 553.25 95,753 28,379 71,482 53,718 1996-97 244 526.29 93.402 22.734 65,181 52,541 r 1997-98 254 465.75 90,420 20,562 59,846 62,467 1998-99 241 481.96 97,167 18,429 69.876 54.112 1999-00 241 500.75 96.798 41,224 81,637 58.966 A 30-year master plan was completed in 1989 which projected wastewater treatment flows to increase from 275 millions of gallons per day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mgd in 1995 and out to 400 mgd in the year 2020. In order to manage the anticipated increase in wastewater flows,the Districts initiated a$1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan. The new debt Increased Interest expenses and the new facilllles have increased depreciation expense. Total expenses have increased$48.9 million,or 57.3 percent since 1990-91, primarily as a result of the expected increase In wastewater flows. Of this increase, depreciation expense represents 20.7 percent and r debt service interest represents another 17.4 percent as a result of the capital facilities expansion and the financing associated with the expansion. As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment flows reached a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to a ten year low of 227 mgd in 1991-92 and have since Increased to 241 mgd in 1999. 00. r The sudden drop In 1991-92 influent is attributable to a combination of factors Including: -the slate-wide recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County, but caused a migration of existing commercial and industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupancies. -the Southern California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes in water usage habits. The master plan was revisited in 1999 and has become a strategic plan. It projects a$1.5 billion capital r expansion plan through the year 2020. Daily wastewater flow is expected to increase to 352 million gallons per day after an emphasis on water conservation and the reduction of inflow and Infiltration. r Source: Orange County Sanitation District. r 43 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Biosolids Produced Last Ten Fiscal Years 45,000 I _ 40,000 35.000 30.000 25.000 20,000 1111990 91 131991.92 01992-93 0199394 D 1994-95 0199596 0199697 01997-98 0199899 01999-00 Fiscal Yea Tonnaae 1990-91 44,968 1991-92 43,464 1992-93 41,964 1993-94 39,650 1994.95 40,228 r 1995.96 38,802 1996.97 39,387 1997-98 42,645 r 1998.99 41.023 1999.00 42,824 r r r Source: Orange County Sanitation District. 44 r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Miscellaneous Statistics June 30,2000 District Organization: 1 Consolidated District servicing 23 cities,unincorporated areas, r and three special districts as follows: Revenue Area No. 1 Revenue Area No.3 Revenue Area No.7 County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange ,r Clues: Cities: Cities: Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea Orange Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana Special Districts: Cypress Tustin Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts: District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary r Garden Grove District Huntington Beach La Habra La Palma Revenue Area No. 11 stl Los Alamitos County of Orange Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach Seal Beach r Revenue Area No.2 Stanton Revenue Area No. 13 County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange Citles: Midway City Sanitary Cities: Anaheim District Brea Brea Orange Fountain Valley Revenue Area No.5 Yorba Linda Fullerton County of Orange r Garden Grove City of Newport Beach La Habra Revenue Area No. 14 Orange County of Orange Placentia Revenue Area No.6 Cities: `r Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine Villa Park Cities: Orange Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin >' Special Districts: Special Dlstdcts: Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Ranch Water District District r Governing Body: 25 member Board of Directors. Staff: 518.5 authorized full-time equivalent employees. Operational Date: July 1, 1954. r Authority. California Health 8 Safety Code Section 4700 et.seq. Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal. r Service Area: 471 square miles. Population Served: 2,213,925 Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtrunk sewers-650 miles r Number of pumping stations-22 Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 90 million of gallons per day Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 151 million of gallons per day r Total 22 1 million of gallons per day Source: Orange County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division. 45 r u u u u u u u (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) u U u u U u u u u u u u Orange County Sanitation District (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 06/30/00 FINANCIAL • OPERA TIONA R E P 0 R T • 4;178.89) 2.889.66 2.044 a -- • 287.24 56,713.47 -59,037 t5—90,;,._ ;4� • 2;010,"432.11 W,327.71 579,004.44 602.727 s` w .764.38 116,81 - - — • • -256,403:79 27.717.25 73,84411a 76,88 785 - '3 ?-�;45- 1418 --- - - _ .00 (324,432.70) - --- 34 .76 - "' . 164 94- 23`. .,i-.41-18,6i • .00 4,1 0.8 (i 8K 66, (2,044.YY) (3,067,49) 1 54: 2939.�- :M _. _ .����Q • , � iA• !991 b.89— —8 652 1" 921 U ' 44 8`l (.2-1,440 31-)— 23,Oi • • 44,916 11) (316,7i • • 'i. � -82 .9-481,7` 1 y • �N� 25;' 6 ,. i5,287.50 7,6, 47 1.475,7` • - d 4 25.40 is. 45 =, . • • me nW 0 02i UJ.K • • • 4. I�.G? ?�1,CE ��le 41`l. ' �".0.45o.&u • • • ,N.V SPHI/V/ Orange County Sanitation District , California FC,/�� IME EN�VPo Table of Contents Section1 -Overview...................................................................................................................1 r' Financial Report- Section 2-Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review r Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4 r Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9 r Section 3- Capital Improvement Program Review ^+ Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2 .+ Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements- Project Life........................6 Section 4-Budget Review by Revenue Area r Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas....................................................................1 Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2 Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4 r Section 5-Self Insurance Budget Review r General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2 r Operational Report r Section 6- Performance Objectives and Work Plans .................................................................1 r r 2000-01 First Quarter Report W V W V W u This Page Left Intentionally Blank i Y.I ILi W V L' L 1r L Overview r First Quarter Financial & Operational Report September 30, 2000 r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2000-01 first quarter comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 2000-01 performance objectives as established in the 2000-01 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is r provided below. Joint Operating& Working Capital Budget Review: At September 30, 2000, 23.86 r percent, or$10,976,000 of the 2000-01 net joint operating budget of $46.0 million has been expended. This is a net decrease in costs of 8.60 percent, or$1,033,000 from the same period last year. Last year's first quarter expenses were inflated by$750,800 r due to unexpected costs of the Huntington Beach Closure Investigation. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 2000 is$473.76 which is $40.64 per million gallons lower than the 2000-01 year's budget of $514.40. The cost per million gallons is lower than budget because flows are 2.79 percent higher than budget at 251.83 million gallons per day in addition to net expenses being lower than budget by r $524,000. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of September 30, 2000 include: Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 23.29 percent of budget through the first quarter and staffing was 11 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 2.16 percent below the total 510 FTE's approved in the 2000-01 budget. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget by year- end. r Memberships—At the end of the first quarter, membership expense totaled r $119,171, or 64.24 percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a majodty of the District's memberships are paid in the first quarter. r • Notices & Ads— First quarter expenses for notices and ads were at 48.42 percent, or$14,815 of the 2000-01 budget of $30,600 due to searches to fill several vacant positions. r Odor Control — Odor control costs for the first quarter are at 46.52 percent of the $997,800 budget. More chemicals have been used this year than in the past due to r some procedural changes. Additionally, during warm weather, more chemicals are needed to minimize odors; consequently, costs will be lower during the second and third quarters when the weather is cooler. r .— Section 1 - Page 1 r am 2000-01 First Quarter Report • Gasoline. Diesel & Oil — First quarter costs for these fuels are at 57.00 percent of r the $187,300 budget. Neither the compressed natural gas (CNG) purchases, totaling $51,500 through September 30, 2000, nor the more than offsetting CNG sales of $76,367 were budgeted for 2000-01. • Professional Services—Audit & Accounting — First quarter expenses of $34,729 are at 76.33 percent of the $45,500 budget due to the timing of the District's annual r financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year. • Natural Gas—At the end of the first quarter, natural gas expense totaled $652,300, r or 57.73 percent of budget primarily due to a large increase in the cost per unit of usage since the budget was adopted. r • AQMD Operating Fees — First quarter expenses for AQMD operating fees are at 55.36 percent of the $120,000 budget due to the timing of when AQMD requires r payments. Semi-annual fees are due during the first and third quarters each fiscal year. r Comparison of First Quarter Results with Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years 550_ j411 514 40 0075 r [ :9i-96 500- .]5 1]S]8 449.6] r 4W n 400 r 350 -- — -- IQ-L7 2LO 9fl88 e9ao 21L IN Year 151 Year 1st Year 1.1 Year IN Annuel ea,Ov and par and Oar end on and On BUdyel As demonstrated in the graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the first quarter has been somewhat lower than at year-end for three of the last four years. The 2000- 01 first quarter continues with this trend, when compared with the year's budget. r r Section 1 - Page 2 r Overview The District budgeted $220,000 for the reappropriation of fiscal year 1999-00 funds in the current year. Of those funds $17,500 was used for reappropriation, and the balance of $202,500 has been reallocated into the general manager's contingency account. The general manager's contingency account was originally budgeted at $340,000 for fiscal year 2000-01. To date $120,000 has been applied towards the classification and compensation study to be performed. This leaves a remaining balance in the revised general manager's contingency account of $422,500. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through the first quarter 2000-01, as budgeted for 2000- 01, and as actually incurred through the first quarter 1999-00. All three charts are quite similar showing little change among the current year first quarter actual, current year budget, and prior year first quarter actual. More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the first quarter for the last five years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for September 30, 1998, 1999, and 2000; Section 2— Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through September 30, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through September 30, 2000 and 1999; Section 2— pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through September 30, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through September 30, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Capital Outlay Review., $BO,000,ODD S8 O,000,000 5770,D00,000 se0,000,000 Ssg000,000 S40,000,000 S30,000,000 520,000,000 510,000,000 $0 9130/00 Actual Projected 2000-01 Originally Estimated Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 2000-01 Capital $13,097,800 $84,355,900 Outlay. S83,529,000 Section 1 - Page 3 L 2000-01 First Quarter Report As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $13,097,800 LJ or 15.68 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 2000-01 as of September 30, 2000. Costs are proportionately low through the first quarter as most projects are still in the design phase, but they are expected to approximate budget by year-end. L� Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital Improvement and a graphical presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay requirements incurred through September 30. L For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 6 L through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At September 30, 2000, revenues from all L Revenue Areas totaled $13.7 million, or 9.03 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at $34.504 million, are only at 6.95 percent of budget, Lr or$2.4 million, and Other (User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, budgeted at$74.3 million, is only at 0.10 percent of budget, or $75,500. Both of these revenue sources are low because most of the property tax L apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are not distributed to the District until after the first quarter of each year. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $43.8 million, or 24.38 percent of budget through September 30, 2000. COP Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at$40.7 million, Is high at 42.96 percent of budget, or$17.5 million because the first of j the semi-annual interest payments is made at the beginning of the fiscal year. Conversely, the costs incurred related to capital improvement projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are L proportionately low through the end of the first quarter at$13,097,800, or 15.68 percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. L Sell-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability L' claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims u administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $435,400 or 18.67 percent of budget at September 30, while total expenses were $628,200 or 26.94 percent of budget. L Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of September 30, 2000. Ir L Section i - Page 4 U Overview Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and incorporated into the 2000-01 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 2000-01, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level. At September 30, 2000, 73 percent of the District's performance objectives and 61 percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. r d Ietl r Section 1 - Page 5 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report u L V V L V This Page Left Intentionally Blank W W V W W �J Section 1 - Page 6 W J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Engineering 0 8 M 0% _ 689. Finance 4% Co... 1% Info.Tech. 6% r E.C.Mgml. 3% 0 Tech.Svcs. WR tT% 1% Departmental Gallonage Charges 2000-01 Budget r Engineering 0 8 M 0% 65% Finance 6% r Comm. 1% Info.Tech. T% r Exec.Mgmt 3% r Tech.Svcs. HIP Is- 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three Months Ended September 30. 1999 r Engmeenng 2% O8M i Finance 649t 5% Comm.1% y Into.Tech. Exec.Mgmt. W. r Tech.Svcs. 1]% H/R Section 2—Page 1 2000-01 First Quarter Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2000-01 L 09/30/96 09/30/97 09/30/98 091301" Annual 09130100 Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow in Million Gallons 22,344.81 22,896.85 23,236.07 22.065.00 89,425.00 23,168.00 L Flow in Million Gallons on.Dav 242.88 248.88 252.57 239.84 245.00 251.83 General Manager's Department $ 12.27 $ 12.95 $ 9.46 $ 15.10 $ 16.12 $ 13.15 L Communications 5.06 5.32 5.64 7.37 7.86 6.68 Human Resources Department 10.39 11.62 7.46 10.96 12.55 7.11 Finance Department Finance Administration 18.33 16.42 13.81 8.05 11.02 0.60 Accounting T46 10.76 11.01 13.68 12.24 11.24 Purchasing B Warehousing 4.79 SAIL 6.88 9.29 11.82 8.96 Total 29.98 32.36 31.70 31.02 36.08 20.80 y Information Technology Department I.T.Administration - - Z57 7.75 10.66 6.48 Customer&Network Support 4.79 7.87 3.38 18.52 20.41 13.95 Programing&Database 8.44 6.85 2.76 5.66 11.72 9.14 L Process Ctrl Integration 0.77 3.25 322 1.42 2.06 &30 Total 14.00 17.97 16,93 33.35 44.85 32.87 Operations&Maintenance Department V Opns&Maint Administration 19.42 6.47 6.36 5.13 4.04 3.65 O&M Proosss Engineering 3.60 524 4.42 9.15 9.08 7.93 Plant No.1 Operators 75.65 67.00 70.73 69.05 75.71 71.67 Plant No.2 Operations 109.80 89.15 96.07 101.88 98.37 103.82 L Mechanical Maintenance 50.63 44.88 50.83 46.45 62.16 40.49 Electrical&Instrumentation Maintenance 39.14 43.67 45.66 52.39 55.86 43.89 Central Genenaticn 25.48 31.68 23.31 29.89 27.34 45.54 Air Quality&Special Projects - 7.73 8.12 13.69 10.51 7.72 Collection Facilities Maintenance 2.99 1.84 3.90 18.50 (6.46) D.17 Plant Facilities Maintenance 38.35 33.46 35.03 38.01 4021 36.05 1 Total 364.96 330.92 344.33 384.74 366.82 360.94 V Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 3.96 5,53 7.83 1.25 3.69 0.45 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 36.96 27.81 32.28 47.87 39.68 39.68 Environmental Sciences Labwatory 37.88 29.29 33.55 42.78 39.71 38.28 u Source Control 2.96 3.03 6.43 (1.17) (2.53) 2.93 Safety&Emergency Response 6.23 3156 2.74 9.37 10.53 11.11 Total 87.99 6a22 82.83 100.10 91.08 82.45 Engineering Department Li Engineering Administration 0.71 0.02 (0.78) 0.60 (1.44) Planning&Design 2.06 0.19 0.81 0.46 (2.78) 1.43 Construction Management 1.77 1.11 0.41 12.47 (7.56) Total 4.54 1.30 1.24 12.15 (9.74) 1.02 Total Joint Operating Expenses 523.21 481.66 499.59 594.19 564.62 534.92 Less:Revenues (36.12) (63.95) (49.92) (49.93) (5022) (61.16) 1 LJ Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 487.09 $ 417.71 $ 449.67 $ 544.26 $ 514.40 $ 473.78 L L Section 2-Page 2 L J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Three Months Ended September 30, 200001 ,r 09130198 09130M year to Date Budget% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 09130/00 Realized General Manager's Department $ 219.871 $ 333.190 $ 1,441,850 $ 304,714 21.13% ^^ Communications 131,107 162,626 702,800 152,531 21.70% Human Resources Department 173,5W 241,888 1,121,980 164,784 14.69% Finance Department — Finance Admtintshatien 32Q823 177,613 985,850 13,9W 1.41% Acceuntimg 255,886 301,808 1,094,860 260,442 23.79% Purchasing B Warehousing 159,952 204,920 1,058,800 207,631 19.65% Total 736.661 684,341 3,137,500 481,073 15.36% IMomration Technology Department Information Technology Adaunistabon 59,723 171,054 953,200 150,153 15.75% Customer B NahWrk Support 194,896 408,746 1,B25.400 323,245 17.71% .. Programing B Database 64.207 124,807 1,048,400 211,854 2021% Process Ctd Integration 74,796 31255 184,370 76,437 41.46% Total 393.622 735.863 4,011,370 761,609 18.99% — Operations&Maintenance Department Opus&Maim. Administration 147,644 113,263 381.500 84,770 23.45% O&M Process Engineering 102,743 201,789 812200 183,711 22.62% Plant No. 1 Operations 1,643,642 1,523,498 6,770,700 1.660,159 24.52% — Plant No.2 Operations 2,232,304 2248,056 8,795,9W 2,404,957 27.34% Mechanical Maintenance 1,181,034 1,024,967 4,684,400 938,059 20.11% Electrical&Instrumentation Wce. 1,058,637 1,156,092 4,994,950 1.016,766 20.36% — Central Generation 541,541 659,502 2,444,600 1,055,163 43.16% Air Quality&Special Projects 18B.589 301,954 939,900 178,928 19.04% Collection Facilities Maintenance 90.5B0 4MI92 (578,060) 3,882 (0.67%) Plant Facilities Maintenance $13.846 838,699 3,595,500 835,177 2323% Total &000,419 8,476.022 32801,6D0 8,361,572 25.49% Technical Services Deparlment Technical Services Administration 182,004 27,622 330,200 10,513 3.18% Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 749,979 1,056,358 3,548,300 919,362 25.91% PsNmnmerual Sciences Laboratory 779,480 944,013 3.551.150 886.980 24.98% Source Control 149,468 (25.879) (226.250) 67,854 (29.99%) Safety&Emergency Response 63.503 206,676 941,550 257.454 27.34% Total 1,924.04 2,208,79D 8,144,950 2,142,163 28.30% Engineering Deparbnent Engineering Administration 418 (17,138) 53,500 (33,369) (6237%) — Planning&Design 18.815 10,072 (248,80 ) 33,131 (13.32%) Construction Management 9,525 275,181 (676,100) 23,9M (3.54%) Total 28,758 288,115 (871,400) 23,663 (272%) Total Joint Operating Expenses 11,608,462 13,110,835 50,490,650 12,393.089 24.55% Less:Revenues (1,159,917) (1,101,648) (4,490,650) (1,417,030) 31.56% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 10,448.545 $ 12.009,187 $ 46,000,000 $ 10,976,059 23.86% r - ,r Section 2—Page 3 - 2000-01 First Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Major Category �• For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Expense Expense Increase Inawee ParraM Budget Thn, Toro (Oeasase) pea ase) Budget RenWning Description 2000.01 09/30100 09/30/99 $ % Retied Budget Salary,Wages&Bomfits $ 41,287,7W $ 9,616,230 $ 10.022,092 $ (405,882) -4JM% 2329% E 31,671,470 Adminlstrellve Experros 753.000 220,522 239.883 (19,351) 43A7% 2929% WZ478 6J Priming S,Publirallon 352,300 88,867 77,647 11,220 14A6% 2522% 253433 Training&Meetings 901,&% 199.251 194,104 5,147 2.65% 22.00% 7OZ599 - Operating Expenses 4,712,960 1,525.267 1,227.259 298.008 2428% 32.38% 3.187.693 Cordractual Services 7.239,200 1.621,975 1,882,076 (260,101) -13.82% 22.41% $617225 ' r Professional Services 2.105,500 320,324 419,468 (99.144) -23.64% 1521% 1,784176 Researcb B Monllodng 2,135,500 557,440 575,471 (18.031) 3.13% 2&10% 1,578,050 W Repairs BMalydenanra 5,287,SW 746.453 1,078,731 (332,278) -30.80% 14.12% 4.541.047 utilities 3,145,250 1.226.573 994,400 232.173 23.35% 39.00% 1,918,877 y Other Materials,Supplles, and Services 2,476,49D 496.957 480,021 16,936 3.53% 20.07% 1,W9,533 V Not Cost Allocation (19,90616w) (4,226,770) (4,08DAM (146,453) 3.59% 2123% (15,679,830) Taal Joint Oper ating rg Fxpenae 50,490,E 12,393,089 13,110,635 (717,748) b.47% 24.55% 38,097,581 V Revenues 80ffsets (4,490,650) (1,417,030) (1,101,646) (315.382) 28.63°h 31.55% (3,073,620) Net Joint Operating Expense $48.000.000 $ 10,976,059 $ 12,OD9,787 E (1,033,126) A.609; 23.86% $ 35,023,941 6+ Gallonage Flmv(MG) 89.425.00 23,165.00 22.055.00 1,103 5.00% u Gallonam Flaw(MGD) 245.00 251.83 239.84 11.99 S.W% Gallonage Flax(V./MG) $ 514.40 $ 473.76 $ 54426 $ (70.50) -12.95% V V I V Section 2—Page 4 J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item r For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Rovonue Rpwnuo Rawnua Insreasa Immase Budget Thre Thru Rerealrdng Nm (Decreaso) (Decrease) Description 200MI OWWOD 0 aWN Budget 0mom It % r Inter District Sewer Use $1.862.650 $ 484,678 26.02% $1,377,972 $ 399,953 $ 84.725 21.18% Wastehauler 425,000 117,019 27.53% 307,981 94,186 22,833 24.24% Sludge Disposal 800,000 179.164 22.40% 620,836 182,638 (3,474) .1.90% CNG Sales - 76.367 WA (76,367) - 76.367 N/A Suap Sales - 9,791 N/A (9,791) - 9,791 WA r Other Sales - 293 N/A (293) 445 (152) -34.16% Rents&Less" 128,000 97,299 76.01% 30,701 91,670 5,629 6.14% General Non-Operallng 75.000 10,352 13.80% 64,648 36,431 (26,079) -71.58% r Vehide B Equipment 300,000 61,56D 20.52% 238.440 74,460 (12,900) -17.32% Power Sales 550,000 235,834 42.88% 314,166 119,080 116,754 98.D5% Szmpli g Charges 350,000 144,673 41.34% 205,327 102,785 41.888 40.75% r Total Joint Operating Revenues 84,490,650 $1.417.030 31.56% $3.073,620 $1,101,648 $ 315.382 28,63% r r r r r r r r r r Section 2—Page 5 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 I" Eveme %Epparae EXPense lnaease Increase W Budget Ttuu Thnr Itemainhp Thru (Decrease) (0eaessa) Description 200041i OW30W 0973&'OD Budget 09FAW $ % Saledes.Waees.&Bem01s Salades&Wages $ 34.839,70D $ 8279,890 23.77% $ 26.W9.810 $ 8.372599 $ (92,709) -1.11% Employee Benefits: Retirement 240D.300 378,110 15.75% 2,022.190 634,433 (256.323) -40.40% u Group lnaeanas 3,614.5D0 851,910 23.57% 2,762,590 892,234 440.324) 4.52% TUtion Reartu sement - 15,639 WA (15.639) 25,753 (10,114) -39.27% Uniform Rental 69,200 13,184 19.05% 56,016 16,5B4 (3,40(1) -20,50% waiw 'Carpevaion 3102DD 77,497 24.98% 232,703 77,499 (2) 0.0D% 6i Unemdoymentlreurance 53,800 0.OD% 53,800 Z990 (2,990) -100A0% Total Benefts 6,448,0D0 1,336.340 20.72% 6,111,680 1.649,493 (313,153) 41198% Salaries,W490,&BeneMs 41,257,700 9.616,230 23.29% 31,671,470 10,022,092 (405,862) 4.05% Matl.Swdv.85ervlose Administrative Expanses V Matenallps 185,500 119,171 6424% 65,329 80,525 38,646 47.99% OEm E,p-Supplies 141,100 24,851 17.61% 116249 29.774 (4.923) -16.53% Ogiee Egierse-Ohm 89.300 13,600 1523% 75,700 19,03E (5,43B) -28.56% u Snell cwp-w Reno 250,00D 39.462 15.78% 210,536 81,538 (42,076) 51.80% Mlrsr Furdlure,Fbeoa4,at, 87,100 23,438 2&91% 63,6M 29.008 (5,570) ARM% Printing 8,Publio9on W Repm4nnHaee 254.300 62,358 24.52% 191,942 68,245 4,113 7.06% Praiting Ouside 59,450 10,058 16.92% 49,392 6,388 3,670 67.45% Natirs&Ads 30,6D0 14,815 4B.42% 15.785 10,889 3,926 36.05% Photo Processing 7.950 1.636 20.50% 6,314 Z125 (489) .23.01% Training&Meetings Meetings 223,850 56,324 25.16% 167,526 50,144 6,180 1232% v Training 678,000 142,927 21.08% 535,073 143,950 (1,033) -0.72% OperAng a Penes Chanel Copgdan 1,361,100 341,335 25.08% 1,019,765 279,278 62,067 22.M% W guide Control 1,435.00D 409.904 28.56% 1.025,096 291,9% 117,918 40.40% CdCr Control 997.80D 464,178 46.52% 533,622 364,767 99,411 2725% Chernlcals-Cogeneration Opel. 20,000 - 0.OD% 20.000 1,628 (1,628) -100.00% MsreleneasChanirals 14,000 1,440 1029% 12,560 6,477 (5,037) -77.77% W Cmsollne,Olesel&Cil 187,3D0 106,7W 57.OD% 80.548 31,756 74,995 236,16% Tools 120,700 36,838 30.52% 83.862 30,511 6.327 20.74% Sdv,Pa'mts,&Jan.Supplies 43,950 8,788 20.OD% 35.162 10,730 (1,942) -1&10% v Lab Chamrels B Suppies 396,400 124,116 32.12% 262,284 170,OT7 (45,961) -27.02% Other Opleallng Supplies 146.710 31,916 21.75% 114.794 40.079 (8.163) -20.37% (Cantlnued) W y Section 2—Page 6 lr J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 E* nse %Expense Expon Increase Increase y Budget Thee Thee Retrainlrg Thee (Decrease) (Dec 1, Doscripllm 200001 m13Wm 09130L00 Budget 0NXV99 $ % Continual CoMracuW Services Solids RermaW 5,000,OOD 1,228,533 24.53% 3,773.487 1,083.749 14Z784 13.18% Other Waste Disposal 467,100 Sam 13.66% 403281 124,683 (60.744) 4&T7% (9eundskeepinBBJanilorial 410.000 9148 22.25% 318,764 87,412 3.824 4.37% Cutmde Lao Se css 28%700 61,662 19.41% 214,138 47,338 4.224 &92% Opgen Rant Ope 295,000 72,409 24.55% 222,591 69,890 Z619 360% Olhe SM.400 116,416 14.53% 6KS84 469,124 (35Z708) -75Aa% Professional SeNres Legal 420,OOD 1MO48 25M 313,954 125,274 (19,228) 45.35% Aueil&Anccumpg 45.500 34.729 7&33% 10,771 3Z776 1,859 &96% Engineeing Z77,500 37,em 1&57% 239,834 s,160 (21AW) -S&33% r Other 1,3SZ5D0 141.883 10.41% 1,220,617 2OZ258 (83,375) -29.86% Research&hbNto4rg FnNronmenial Mxdroiing 1,510,000 481,690 31.90% 1,C28,310 455A24 28266 5.77% Air Quality Mxi4ohng 75,000 - 0.00% 75.000 - - WA Resmrch Ss,500 75,760 13.76% 474,750 120,047 (44,297) 3&90% Repairs&fA0lrterprce Matesals B Sevirss 3,904,050 690,531 15.13% 3,313,512 9&5,372 (394,541) 40.97% r SM Ms Agri 1AM45D 155,922 1127% I=AZB 93.359 OZ583 67.01% WlNles Tel 251,850 48.182 19.13% 203,6BB 54.748 (6,566) -11.99% Diesel For Genaaw 11,000 5,299 4&OB% 5.711 - 5,289 WA ,r N tuml Cgs 1,130.000 852,302 67.73% 477,6B8 319,897 33Z415 103.92% po a 921,600 256,30E 27.81% 555,192 403.998 (147,69(1) 36.58% Water 830,900 284,482 31.83% W408 215,767 48,725 22.589/o Older Operating Supplies r OtsiEe Equip Rental 146.180 41,134 28.14% 1MO48 25,712 15,422 59.98% District Equip Para) 32ZOM W72B 182A% 283,Z72 74,195 (15.467) -20.85% Insurance 1,20D,OOD 28D,542 21.71% MAW 240,60 19.893 827% Freight 52,SAD 15,683 29.65% 3&977 IZ857 Z725 2120% hiss Opeating Eieme 1811,000 40,644 24.09% 128,355 46,719 (SO75) -13.OD% ACAD Operating Fees 120,000 66,433 65.36% 53,567 61,PP6 5= 8,50% GanDrai Manager Cordegecy 42ZSDO - 0.00% 422,5DO - - WA Poor year reappopnation - WA - - - WA Other NanOper Expense 44,25D 13,893 31.40% 30.357 18,663 (4,770) -75.55% Metls,Supp,&San. 29,109,550 � �T 1 7 OBE 1 1 Tolal J.Q RegWreme is 70,397.250 16,619,859 23,61% 53,777.391 17.191.162 (671293) 3.32% Net Cost Alloc tim (19,905.600) (4,226,770) 21.23% (15,679,890) (4,08D.317) (146.453) 3.59% Net J.O.Requirements 60,49D,650 12,393,009 24.55% 38,097,551 13,110,835 (717,746) -5.47% Less: Rwenus (4,490,650) (1,417.030) 31.56% (3,073,620) (1,101,648) (315,382) 28.63% NN J.O.Expenditures $46,0OD,000 $ 10,976,059 23.81A. $ 35,023.941 $ 12,009.187 S (1,033,12B) -&6m% r Section 2—Page 7 ,r 2000-01 First Quarter Report W Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 W Increase Increase Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) W 09130/00 09130/99 $ % Treatment Process: Preliminary Treatment $ 1.555,352 $ 1.232,574 $ 322,778 26.19% 6w Primary Treatment 1.237,813 1,287,363 (49,550) -3.85°/> u Secondary Treatment 856.085 796.088 59,997 7.54% Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 138,982 150,540 (11,558) -7.68% W Effluent Disposal 143,788 192,918 (49,130) -25.47% Solids Handling 4.894,768 4,828,664 66,104 1.37% Cogeneration 1,086,811 1,177,606 (90,795) -7.71% W Utilities 178,462 197,855 (19,393) -9.80% Electrical Distribution 135,138 165,359 (30,221) -18.28% L, Miscellaneous Buildings 1.105,427 1,309,499 (204,072) -15.58% Air Quality 442,310 675,158 (232,848) -34.49% W Laboratory 618,153 1,097,211 (479,058) -43.66% V Total Joint Operating Requirements 12,393,089 13,110,835 (717,746) -5.47% Less: Revenues (1,417,030) (1,101,648) (315,382) -28.63% Net Joint Operating Expenditures $ 10,976.059 $ 12,009,187 $ (1,033,128) .8.60% u W W W W W Section 2—Page 8 W J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents September 30, 2000 575 560 — 549 519 510 r r [535 532 450 560 06130/97 06/30198 06/30/99 06'3=0 09130,00 ■Actual ■Vacant r At September 30, 2000, the total head count was 511 employees, or a full time equivalency of 499.00. r Section 2- Page 9 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report L u L.i This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L L V L' L L L L Secfim 2—Page 10 L CIP Review Capital Improvement Program- FY 1999-00 For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2000 62n,or2 on!nee1.p' S2 �90'.Lpn RUJm!! en17$23 ir!llmlm S2.,16 59c5 y-0,6 d9aR.an 16, S2U..366 Puo,Vlar21. S59.002 SSSSWE1.1—mla..$580.206 15.616 wafer Itte'.menl PfOpcu systems a S95]599 Mualllow W 6 SupPon Pmpps 2' S219.235 Pmsst. llC P".. 51.59a,H9 2'. PINI>ulOmlmn6 121.LDtg lion � 121. Total Capital Improvement Expenditure- $13,097,817 clmao�symm, x ..6 Total Capital Improvement Funding-$13,097,817 Section 3- Page 1 2000-01 First Quarter Report L' Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year U For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2000 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected u Outlay 09130/00 Outlay Outlay Collection System Improvement Profects Collections u Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab, S 64,000 S 3.522 $ 60.478 $ 64,000 Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 146,000 146.000 146,000 Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 119,000 - 110,000 119,000 Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 68,000 - 68,000 68,000 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 234,000 - 234,000 234,000 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer 210,000 5,385 204,615 210,000 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sin.Abandonment 43,000 12,099 30,901 43,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer 148,000 53,804 92,126 146,000 L Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations 15.000 2,665 12.435 16,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protec. 1,475.000 119,829 1,355,171 1.475,000 Taft Branch Improvements 7.000 - 7,000 7,000 Atwood Subtrunk Improvements 92,000 17,653 74.347 02,000 L Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 49,000 11,321 37,679 49,000 Orange-Westsm Subuunk Relief Sewer 1,186,000 14,863 1,171,137 1,186,000 Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Tronk Sewer 2,214,000 340.477 1,873,523 2,214,000 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1 3.662.000 1,p46,608 2,615,392 3,662,000 Ly Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station 1,194 (1,194) 1.194 Mods.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave. 73,W0 73,000 73,000 Big Canyon Othute Sewer Rehabilitation 38,000 1,343 36.657 38,ODD Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 1,768,000 61.440 1.706.560 1,768,000 Replacement of me Bitter Point Pump Station 98,000 19,047 78.953 g8,000 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 118.000 22.664 95.336 118,000 Rehabilitation of the 14th Street Pump Station 186.000 19,098 IM902 188,000 Rehabilitation of the*A*Street Pump Station 193,000 24,322 168.678 193,ODD Rehabilitation of the Bay Bdtlge Pump Station 72,000 933 71.067 72,000 Rehabilita0on of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 46.000 1.113 44,887 4e,000 Abandonment of AS Trunk,Watson and Col.Sewers - 7,430 (7,430) 7,430 Goldenwest Tmnk Sewer Replacement 11310,000 940,289 369.711 1,310.000 Heil Avenue Interceptor 1,944,000 1,123.870 820,130 1.944,000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 177,000 82,476 114,62A 177,ODD 1 Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy. 51,ODO - 51,000 51,OOD L Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 25,000 1,108 23.892 25,000 Capital Improvements,Collections 14.000 - 14.000 14,000 Realignment of S.Anaheim Rlf - 10,468 (10,468) 10,468 Eudid Trunk Manhole Rehabilitation - 3,415 (3,415) 3,415 L Replace SARI Control Gate - 11098 (1,098) 1,098 Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab. - 702 (702) 702 Miller-Holder Improvements - 9,446 (9,446) It 5 j Relocation of Lido Pump station - 17,770 (17,770) 17,770 IYrll Gomenwest St.Sewer Replacement 791 (791) 791 New Pump Project-Edinger Pump Station 21,705 (21,7(151 21.705 Subtotal-Collections 15,845,000 3,979,848 11 ifill52 15,919,e19 Revenue Am 7 L Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations-Arm 7 4,000 6,209 (1,209) 5,209 Racquet HNI Pump Station Abandonment 66,OOD 1,980 64,D40 66,000 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. - 2.744 (2,744) 2.744 Lirb Tustin Aase-Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer 234.000 987 233,013 234.000 MOGaw Subbunk Sewer B Pump Station Abandonment 23,000 - 23,000 23,000 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach'A' 236,ODD 4,329 231,671 238,000 Gisler-Redhal System Improvements,ReaLh'B' 69,000 825 88,175 69,000 Tustin Trunk Improvements 69,000 825 58.175 59,000 Orange Trunk Improvements 186,000 3,465 162,535 185,000 L Section 3 - Page 2 CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year '-' For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 200"1 .,a Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay 09/30100 Outlay Outlay West Trunk Improvements 9.000 220 8.780 9,000 Gisler-RedhildNOM Trunk improvements 2.29,000 5.151 222.649 228,000 r Main-Baker Force Main Ventlation 30.000 - 30,000 30,000 Improvements to Main St.P.S. - 2.982 (2,982) 2.982 College Ave PS Parallel Force 62 (62) fit Subtotal-Revenue Area 1,124.000 28,759 1,095,241 11,130,997 Revenue Area 14 Tustin Airbase-Armstrong Subuunk Sewer 588.000 2,538 585,462 588,000 Improvements to Main St.P.S. 7,667 (7,667) 7.667 Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 586,000 10,205 577,795 695,667 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 17,557.000 4,016,812 13,538,188 17,645,683 Treatment&Disposal Projects Collections Facilities Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 534.000 104,214 429.786 534,000 Co-op Projects, Inflow/InBLL Reduc0on 2,752,OD0 (22,118) 2.774.118 2,752,0D0 Transfer to Other Projects: 144,111) (44,111) (",Ill) d SSES for Three Collection Areas 44,111 ".Ill ",111 Districl-wide Geographical Information System(GIB) 300,000 - 300,000 300.000 SSO Training Facility 64,000 64,000 64,000 r Subtotal-Collections Facilities 3,650,000 128,207 3,523,793 3,850,000 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 609.000 457.125 161.876 609.000 Sunflower Drive Replacement 247,000 38,453 208.547 247,000 r Headworks Rehabilitation/Refurbishment 30,000 2.789 27,211 30,000 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 133,000 168,923 (35.923) 168,923 Headwoft Pump Improvement&Overhaul - 23,351 (23,351) 23,351 Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 26,431 128,431) 26,431 r Subtotal-Headworks 11019.000 717,072 301,928 1,104,705 Primary Treatment Facilities Modificatlom for Odor Control 247,000 11,477 235,523 247.000 Pri,Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities 6.647,000 246.243 6.400.757 6,647,000 Waste Sidestream Pump Station Upgrade 697,000 667.000 567,000 Circular Clarifier Ddve Replacement/Upgrade 344,000 - 344,000 344,0D0 r Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 80,000 - 80,GD0 80,000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364,000 364,0D0 364,000 Subtotal•Primary Treatment 8,2481000 267,720 7,091,280 8.249,000 Secondary Treatment Sec Treat Mon tong&Cntd Sys.Upgrade 9M.000 2,564 898,436 901,000 Rehab Trickling Filters&Construct New Clarifiers 494,000 15.069 478,941 494,000 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 312.000 - 312,000 312,000 Oxygen Plant Replocament/Rehabilitatbn 110,000 - 110,000 110,0D0 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 200,000 200,0D0 200.000 Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2,017,000 17AM 1,999,377 2,011,000 Solids Handling&Digestion s' Dewatering Belt Press Rebuid 210,000 55.058 154,932 210,000 Dewatering Belt Press Extension 230,000 - 230,000 230.000 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 3,929,000 912,823 3.016.177 3,929,000 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 2.632.000 1,063,070 1,668,930 2.632.000 `O Digestion It Dewatering RehablRefurbishmenl 66.000 - 66,000 66,000 Dewatering Bell Press Rebuild 326,000 10,071 315,929 326.000 r Section 3-Page 3 .a 2000-01 First Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year j For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2000 LI 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 20DO-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay 09/30I00 Outlay Outlay High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mach.Seals 425,000 29,173 395,627 425,000 _ Bell Press Automation 91,000 8,534 82,466 91.000 Sludge Grinder Replacement 222,000 5,576 216,424 222,000 V Tula Rench Acquisition/Biosolids Managements Needs 4,774.DDO 4,774.000 4.774.000 Subtotal-Solids Handling S Digestion 12,906,000 2,01K316 10,820,685 12,90510DO Ocean Outfall Systems _ Outfall Flow Meter Replacement 38D,400 8,554 371,646 380,400 Peak Flow Management 484,400 21,804 462.596 484,400 Effluent Pumping Station Annex 859,200 12,681 846.519 859,200 Investigation and Repalrof Ocan Outlet 12,549 (12,649) 12,549 W Subtotal-Oman Outfall Systems 1,724,000 $5,588 1,668,412 1,736,640 utility Systems Elemriml Power System Studies 488,000 67,700 420,300 488,000 Standby Power and Reliability Modifications 1,528,000 426,750 1,101,250 1,S28,000 Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1 9 2 57,000 72,316 (15,316) 72,316 Impr.To Cen-Gen Starting Air System 62,00D 4,299 57,701 S2,0DD Stomn Drain Database Development and Tagging 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 60 Central Generation Automation 101,000 - 101,000 101.000 Chemical Facility Mods,Al Plant No. 1 699,000 366,373 33ZO27 9g9,000 Plant Utilities Rehabilitation/Refurbishment - 2,881 (2,881) 2.881 LW to Elec.9 Control Systems 483.000 173,0DD 310,00D 493,000 High Pressure Compressed Air System 74,0DO 42,004 31,998 74,000 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 299,D00 2,871 288,129 299.000 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 312,000 54,132 257,888 312,ODO V Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120,000 - 120,000 120,000 East and West RAS Elevator Upgrade 106,000 - 108,001) 105,000 Electrical Facility Modifications 9 Safety Upgmdm 3,290 (3,290) 3,29D Subtotal-Utility Systems 4,429,000 1,215,616 3,213,384 4A50.487 V Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications,for Odor Control 347,000 20,218 326.782 347,000 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 380,000 9.645 370.355 380,000 Comprehemive Odor Control Assessment 70,000 404.090 (334.090) 404,090 Automation of Foul Air System Condensate Drainage 73,000 - 73,000 73,000 Scrubber Chem.Feed System Mods. 430,000 31,964 398,036 430,000 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 1,300,000 465,917 t174,083 1,SY1,090 Plant Automation S Computerization Computerized Facility Revs.9 Dwg.System 909.000 638,399 270,601 909,OW Power Monitoring and Control Systems 374,000 4,839 369,161 374,000 y Plant RelnventlONAutomation Project 2,660,000 611,669 2,04%331 2,690.0DO CMMS Programming 129,000 48,494 00,506 12g,0DO Document Management 559,DD0 33,698 525.302 559,000 Data Integration 569,000 8.505 550.495 5W000 W Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 157.000 6,183 150.817 167,000 Intranet Application Development 136.000 - 138,000 13S000 Internet E-mail Browsing(Websile) 91.000 - 91,000 91,0DD j Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 134,000 39,740 94,260 134,OOD L Voice-Data Building Rewiring 50.000 5,381 44,619 50,000 Records Management Program 165,ODD 82,403 82.597 185,000 Source Control Programming 801000 4,834 75.166 80.000 is Geographic Information System 978,000 6.818 971.182 078.000 Automation Report Publishing 39,000 30,141 8,859 39,000 _ Section 3-Page 4 L r CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year r For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 200"1 2000-01 2000-01 2000-01 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay 09/30/00 Outlay Outlay Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 284,000 780 283,220 284,000 Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 210,000 72.090 137,910 210,000 SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 157,000 - 157,000 157,000 Replacement of Interplant Fiber Optics 445,000 575 444,425 445,000 Windows 20DO Migration 333,000 - 333,OOD 333,000 Office 2000 Upgrade 69,000 - 69,000 69,000 SCADA System Replacement Study 310,000 - 310,000 310,000 r SCADA Gruphice Tagging Update 458,OW - 458,000 458,000 Plant 2 Dewaterin9 PLC SCADA Upgrade 281,000 - 281,000 281,000 FIS Upgrade 1,281,000 - 1,281,000 1,281,000 r Information Technology Disaster Recovery 91,000 - 91,000 91,000 Specialized Process Network 100,000 100,000 100,000 Subtotal-Plant Automation B Computerisation 11,039,000 1,594,540 9,444,451 11,039.000 Process Related Special Projects Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 20,000 5,888 14,112 20,OD0 Thermal Insulation Management Program 49,000 - 49,000 49,000 Plant O It M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 1,608,000 - 1,608,000 1.608.000 r Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 447.000 28,248 418,752 447,000 Managed Maintenance Program 348,000 - 348,000 348,0D0 Special Projects for FY 200D-01: Solids Processing 258.000 42,868 216,132 258,OD0 Spc Proj 00-01: Odor C introl Regulatory Compliance 651.000 142,231 508,769 651,000 ,r Special Projects for FY 200D-2001: Liquid Streams 215.000 215,000 215,000 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 3,598,000 219,235 3,376,765 3,596,000 Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 1,042,000 282.942 759,058 1,042,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 1,042.000 202,643 839.357 1,042.OD0 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 1,042,000 232.953 809,047 1,042,OD0 Area Classification Studies 1,278.000 166,190 1.111.810 1,278,DD0 r Strategic Plan-Phase 2 98,000 18,911 77,D89 96,000 Strategic Plan Program EIR 33,000 6,694 26,305 33,000 Modification to Eldsimg Mach.Systems 476,000 4.345 471,656 476,000 HVAC Equipment Replacement 21 Plants No.1 and 2 737.000 - 737,000 737,D00 r Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 128,000 7,783 120,217 128,000 Security System lmpmvements 3a3,000 30.320 352,550 383,000 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 600,000 we 499,192 500,000 Warehouse Reinvention Pmject 240.000 - 240,000 240,000 r Process Safety Management Compliance Program 30,000 30,00D 30,000 Subtotal-Miscellaneous a Support Projects 7,027,000 963,589 6.073.411 7,027,000 Water Management Projects Grourumter Replenishment System 2,329,ODO 526.081 1.802,919 2,329,000 Water Conservation 418,000 45,794 372,206 418,000 Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program 3,358,000 8,331 3,349,669 3.358.000 Subtotal-Water Management Projects 6,105.000 580,206 5,524,794 6,105,000 r Construction in Progress;Completed a[fi/30l00 284,368 (284,988) 284,968 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 63,060,000 8.572,003 54A87,997 63,798,197 r Capital Equipment Purchases 2,912,000 507,002 2,404,998 2,912,000 Total Collections and Treatment 8 Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases $ 83,529,000 $ 13,097,817 $ 70,431.183 $ 84,355,080 Section 3-Page 5 2000-01 First Quarter Report v Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Ufe For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Cumend TOM Approved Jura30.ated Year Pcostat Reutureg Project Aoacoad ed Projected e30 at Future _ Budget Cost Cost June 30.2001 Budget Collection Svarem MorovaroM PmlecM V Collections Saes,Are Twnk Sasser Rehab. $ 7.494.000 $ 75.053 $ 64.000 $ 139.063 $ 7.354,937 Pumpatation SCADA CammumlcafiCns Sksty 146,000 - 146,ODO 146,000 - Corewan rood Chemical TreatrwA Fadlily 3W,000 - 119,000 119,000 189,000 Plase2Caros1on Assessmmd 68,000 - 68,000 68,000 Tronk Sewer Mapping Project 362,000 - 234,000 234,000 128,OW Carton Carryon Dam Interceptor PwWtd Sewer 5,007,000 28,039 210,000 238,039 4,768,961 Carbon CnynSaw anti Rang ft.Pbntlomcent 2,685,000 65.185 43,000 108,185 2,5W15 ti Santa Are FFAw lnerceptor Relef Sewer 11,853,000 W.606 146,000 184,605 11,669394 RehatPttatian of Outlying Rapp Station 804,000 348.997 16,000 363.967 440.M3 Santa Are River Interceptor Reafgmaxit and Rota. 49,787,000 655.437 1,476.000 2,131.437 47,6K563 Taft Branch in p ovamer is 4.742.000 9,3w 7.000 16,386 4,725,614 Atwood SubWnk lmpovanenla 1,860,000 62,621 92,Om 154,621 1.735.379 ;are Brr3d Relief lmpmernaita-Reach W 10,831,OOD 13,510 - 13.610 10.817,490 _ Replacetrnnl of KNer4blder Task Sewer Bohm 1,996,ODD 64,434 49,000 113,434 1,882,566 .. OrMe-Western Subtnmk Relief Sewer 1=,OD0 52,555 1,186.000 123 W5 (6,565) Lx Rehabilitation of the Magnofa Trwk Satyr 10,354,0D0 7,531,534 2,214.000 9,745,534 608,466 Rehabilitation of KWdia Tnmk Sewer,Phase 12,127,OD0 - - - 12,127,ODD War Holder Tmnk Sayer System,Reach l 10,697,OD0 7,724,756 3,662,000 11,356,755 (869,758) Rehabilitation of 0a Seal Beach Pomp stator, 3,083,OD0 - - - 3,083,ODD Rehabilitation of the Westede Rmip Station 1,819,0D0 148 1,194 1,342 1017 % sr Mods.Tn MsgrdiaR"Sewerta Westsm Ave. 209,000 - 73,Om 73.ODD 136,OD0 Sg Canyon Offite Sewer Rehabilitation 2,714,0D0 4,399 3%0m 42,399 Z671MI RepIameardof Balk Bay Trwk Sewer 8,095,OD0 285.235 1,76BOm 2,053= 6.041.764 u Rapacertmarl of the BB[er Pdr4 Pump Station 3,480,000 9,940 990D0 107.910 3,372,060 Reptacana0 of the Rocky Pdr4 Retry Station 4,124,000 7,549 118,000 125,549 3,9W,451 - Retnbllibear,of 8e 148i Sheet Rmp Stator, 2,211,OD0 5,286 188,OD0 193,266 2,017,714 Rehabiflatien of the'A7 Sow Pwp Station 2,248,OD0 4,205 193,000 IUW5 2,0501795 RehffiIlBafion of the Bay Bridge Rapp station 1,094,000 - 72.0D0 72,OOD 1,022,ODD Retadl8atim of Be Crystal Cove Prnip Station 306,000 31 4BOD0 46,E 259,531 Abmtlaunent of AS Task,Watson and Cal.Seeers 2,176,000 130,218 7.430 137,648 2,03B,35L Caldermeat Trunk Sewer Replacement 4,5(17,000 2,472,663 1.310,000 3,782.563 724.437 WE Averwe Intercepter 3,711,OD0 217,604 1,944,00D 2,161,604 115491396 W WamerAveme Relief Saner 3,399,000 48,079 177,0DO 225.079 3,173.921 Lateral and Sewer Abardonewt M Padfic Coast May. 129,ODO - 51.000 51,000 78,OOD Rehebifibtion of the Edinger PLmp Station 1,"%OD0 359 25.000 25,369 1p2.3,631 Cagtal lmpwrawas,wwodors SDO,000 - 14,000 14DDO 486.000 Re pnwart of S.Arehehe Rif - - 10.468 10,468 (10.468) Euclid Trwk Manhole Rehatllila8an 1,964,700 1,516,728 3.415 1,520,143 444.667 Replace SARI Conbd Cate 757,00D 794,661 1,098 795,769 (39759) Seal Beam Ovd.Rehab. 46D,000 416,892 702 417,594 42405 Mller+ldder lmpoveeads 6.344,000 6,027.11M 9.446 6,037.266 306.734 Reloaboe of Lido Rapp station 3,395200 3,391.452 17,TFO 3,409= (14.022) GoIdaaest SL Sewer Replamnent 491,700 368.476 791 369287 122,433 Hew Poop Prejed-Edinger Reny station 590 21,705 22295 (2729M Sublow-co0edions 190,849,6O0 32,373,687 15,919,019 48,292,706 142.558.894 Revenue Arw7 Petiabititallon of Oueyug"stations-Area7 396,000 708,5w 5,209 713,717 (317.717) 6. Racquat MD Puns Station AbaMonmaR 125,000 65,689 65.OD0 131,M (5.689) Stnnower Intercepter Monhde Rehab. 5,397,000 114,024 Z744 116,768 5270232 TustnAhbase-Amnbong S6bonk Saver 1,731,000 91,079 234,000 325.079 1.405,921 Gister4ledhil Tnrrik Rdoation 5,704,000 - - - 5,704.000 v 6w Section 3-Page 6 I CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 currant Total Approved Juns30,2101)0 year Projected Ramaldng Project Aopumdeted Projected Costat Fubw Budget Cull Cast June a 21101 Budget MoGa.SubWNk Senor B Pump Staten Abendavmem 1,270.000 - 23,OOD 23.000 i=too r Gisler-Redt011 Trunk Improvements.Reach-A' 4,028,000 29,864 236,000 265.864 3,760,135 GSM(J7a00n System Improvements.Reach-6- 5.013,0)0 - 69,000 69,W0 4,944,000 Tustin Trunk Improvements 3,655,WO - 59.000 59,OD0 3,597.000 Orange Trunk lnprovemerds 3.942,000 29,675 165,000 195,675 3,746.325 West Trek Improvements 496.000 - 9.OW 9,000 467.000 (2sler4tedi018NaN Trutt Improvements 5,704,WD 39.418 ma,W0 267,418 S436,582 Replaoerwnt of ale College Ave.Pump Station V17,000 - - - 4,717.000 r Rehabilitation of five Warlatimr Pump Statlon 1,354,WD _ _ _ 1.354,000 Maio&7ker Farm Main Vaetstlen 30,ODO - 30,000 30,000 Improvanrds to Main St.P.S. 1,0116,680 1.223.132 2,982 1,22i,114 (139,434) Cdlegs Ave PSPaald Fare 1.877,ODD 81,483 62 81,545 1,795,455 Svmldal-Revenue Am 46.5186W 2,382,672 1,130,997 3,513,859 43,004A11 r Revenue Ares 14 Tustin Aidam-Armstrong Subbed,Sever 4,621.000 234,202 58 ODO 822,202 3.798,798 Improvements to Wan St.P.S. 2,794,320 3.146.197 7.667 3,152854 (358,544) r Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 7,415,320 3379,399 595,667 3,975AW 3440,254 Totat Collection System bmprovareM Projects 244,78 WO 38.135,958 1706,603 56,781,641 189,W1,9W Treatment 6 Disposal Protects ..+ COIIecllom FadlitMs Duhand Tnmk Svv PnhaN1Ha8en 30,630.000 122.482 534,W0 656,482 29,W3518 Coop Pmjeda,InfloWIMIL Redu w 144,750,000 244482 2,752,000 2.996,482 141,753.518 Tmmefato Oliter PrcJedsi (140.254) - (44,111) (44,111) (96.173) s Nuturme Row Divadon F.at Nexpvt Dunes 40,000 20,397 - 20.397 19A03 SSES W Three Colecdon Areas 1002M Z376 44,111 46,497 53.797 Duel Geographical lnfermeflen System(GIS) 2500.00) - 300,000 300.000 2,200,000 SSOTradre Fadllty 60.ODD - 80.000 64.000 - r Rehab 3 Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Sta9m 1,799,500 1,728 - 1,728 1,797,772 Subtotal-Cdle4tloru Fadl8lss 179,743,510 3914W 3.6511,000 4,0414W 175,702035 Headworks Gilt Alga Replacement 110881000 108,604 609,001) 717.604 370,396 .,. Sunflower Drive ReplaeomaR 407,000 71,953 247,000 318,953 88,047 HeadmiS RdadntallonlReludshme'd 4.330,000 416 X000 30,416 4,299,584 Headworks Improvements W Plant No.2 74,118,OD0 319,944 168923 488,867 73.629,133 Headworks Puny lmpwament 8 OvamaW 300,000 210,189 23,351 223,540 76.460 r, RdmD of Main Sewage Pump Motors 209.000 71219 M431 97,650 111.350 Subtotal-Headwords 00452000 Tn,325 1.1pk7W 1,877,030 70,574.970 Primary Treatment Fadliaes MbdPoatlms for Oder Cmad 216,000 13.191 247.000 260,191 15.809 ,r N.Clarifiers 16316 Racal Faditse 75A50,000 3415,306 6,647,000 10,062,305 0,397,695 Waste Sidesbeam Pump Station upgrade 11089,000 - W7.000 567,OD0 502.000 Grata ClaifierOdve ReOaeum,r Upgrade 5.840,000 - 344,000 344,030 5,496,000 Sludge 0auity Mda Upgrades 800.000 - 80.000 80.000 720.000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 3KODO 384.000 364,OD0 Subtotal-PrinoryTreaerent 83,79aW0 SABAH 8.21B.OW 11,677496 72121.504 Secondary Treating t Sec.Trent Mmttairg 8 Cnbl Sys.Upgrade 4.317,000 468.597 901,OW 1,367,507 2,949AW y4 Redd,TddJirg Filters 6 Cantrud New Cudflers 2I.W1,000 18.746 494,OD0 512,746 20488,254 Activated sludge Plat Rehabilitation 3,745,000 - 31ZODD 31ZOOD 3433.000 Oxygen Plat Replaanrent/Pahadlitation 110.000 - 110.0100 110.000 - Adla Sludge Aeradon Seen Selector Study 510,000 2MOOD 2W.000 310.000 Subleed-Secondary Treahnant 29AMAW 405.343 2A77.W0 2.502,343 27,181l Section 3-Page 7 2000-01 First Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Current Total w Approved June30,2000 Year Projected Rennir8ng Prefect Aavmulated Projected Cori at Famous, Budget Con cost June 30,2W1 Budget SOOds tiering 8 8 Press Restion y' D .rftg Bag Press Eiden tl 528,OOD 278,736 230.000 489,736 98,26- DewateNg Belt Press EdmsPla 230,000 - 230,OW 351,OW l _ Rehabilitaem ct Digesters at Plant No.2 17,234,00D 8,422,299 3,929,OW 10,351,299 8,882,701 Solids Storage and Track Loading Facility 15,120,000 1,394,276 2,632,000 4,026276 11.091 Cigesfion&Dexatamg RehablRefurDisbinent 7.800.00D 66,000 86,000 7,734,000 !++ Dexatxring Bell Preas Rebuild 825,00) 255,522 325,000 581,522 243,478 High Rate Digester W Pumps Mach.Seals 517.00D 256,988 425.000 681,988 (164,968) _ Belt Press Automation 17&OOD 33.909 91,000 124,91)) 60,091 Sludge Grinder Replaomrent 224,OOD 16,776 222,OD0 238,776 (14,776) w Tula Ranch AcquisioonlBioselitls Managements Needs 9,850.000 4,774,000 4.774,000 5.076,OOD Subtotal-Sonde,Handling&Ingestion SZ503,000 8.65&WB izinnow 21.Se4,s0e sfg&494 Oman Oulfall systems iv Codall Fkwi Mate,Replacernest 1,124,000 107,437 380,400 487.837 636.163 Peak Flow Management 4,055.000 63,753 1s1,400 SWI53 3,506,847 Effluent Pumping Station Mnex 2&34&0W 87,M 859200 946,993 27,399,W7 - Investigation and Repair of Ocan Ouffall 1274.600 1,104,684 12.549 1,117243 157,357 Subtotal-Ocean Oulfall Systems 34M.WO 1,36&677 1,736.549 &100226 31,69&374 I.d tNllitysysEema _ Electric Power System Studies 3216,0W 1.67/,997 488.000 2.185,997 1.050.003 Standby Pw and Reliability Modifications 17,370,000 5,830,362 1,52S.0W 7,358,352 10,011,63e uv Cade Tray lmprevements at Plants l&2 26,8MOOD 879,344 72,316 951,BW 25.M,340 Impr.To Cen�Gen Staring As Systan 141,0W 18,333 62,000 a0.333 60,667 Starr Drain Calabass D elcpmanl and Tagging 10D,000 - 100,ODD 100,000 Centel Genersax�Aulonagan 2.964.000 - 101.DD0 101,000 2,863,001) Ir CherNal Facility Mods.At Plant No.1 3.768.000 2.968.524 691 3,667,524 100,476 Plant WDBes RohabiglaeordRefurbishmaM &35D.W0 - 2,881 2,W1 3,357,119 _ Madi6ations toE &Conttrd Systems 2.615,000 2,036,632 483,000 2.519,632 95,afe High Pressure Compressed Air System 409,000 a56,193 74,DDO 43&1ge (21.10) L Gas Canpmesor Addition at Plant No.2 907AW 21,100 299,000 320,100 Sell, ,900 Utilities Rdlab7dation and Refurbishmad &3g4,00D 49,302 31ZOOO 361.302 3,032.69E Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120A00 120.000 120.001) - F t ant West Ri Binoatar Upgrade 106.000 - 106,000 106.000 - Electrical Facility,Modifications&Safety Upgrades 442,900 24&465 3.290 251,755 191,145 eJ Subtotal-Why Systems 65,710,900 14.086252 445DAU 18,638,739 47,259,181 Oda Control Related Projects Facilities Noddagas for Odor Cmtrct 364.000 15,739 347,000 362,M 21251 V Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 2.6108,000 14,%4 380,000 394,394 2.291,6W Comgehmiirve Oda Contrd Assassmmt &405.000 1aZags 4 .090 586,98E 2,879,012 Aata,a0on of Foes Air system Condensate Drairege 73,000 - 73,01M 73.000 - Scrubber Chain Feed SysteinMods. 796.000 154.102 430,OW 584,102 211.1198 Subtotal-Odor Gerund!Rotated Projects 7,405,000 W7,133 1,634,080 2W1.229 5.403,777 w Picot Automation&computerization Comgdalred Facifdy Race.&big.System 4,956.0DO 2.994,448 909,OD0 3.903,448 1,052.552 Poxes Monitoring and Control Systems 3,355,000 1&046 374,000 392,046 2,962954 y Plaid RernminbocAutomaEm Project 25,760.000 5,588,645 2,660,000 &248M5 17.511265 CMNIS Programnung 49D,000 274,082 129,000 403.082 86.918 _ Docunrenl Managaosnt 864,000 476,620 559.000 1,035,620 (171,620) Data Integration 4.334,000 2.039.487 559,0W 2,588,487 1,735,513 Strategic Irdomral on Architecture(SA) 724.001) 272,552 167,000 429,582 294,418 4�4 Intranet Appfiation Devtlolammt 300.000 78,834 136,000 214,834 65.1W _ Internet E-mail Bmxsing(Website) 300.000 169.939 91,W0 260,SM 39.061 Nabiak Backbone Upgrade Oximmuation 1,487,ODO 1,OD4.106 134,000 1.138,106 368.894 w y Section 3-Page 8 y CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2000 Current Treat Approved Jura W.2000 year Projected Rerrmirmq Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Col Jurre 30.2001 Illusion VcioaAzte Slaking newhirg 679.000 616,997 50,000 668991 12903 a. Records Management Program MOOD 64.445 10,000 229,445 25.05 Source Centel Programming 577.000 334.433 80,000 414,433 162,567 Gmgraptilc lnfonretion System 4.157,000 154.346 97SOD0 1,132,346 3.024.654 Automation P4pod Pubrshing 195,000 89217 39,000 128,217 66.783 yam, Field Fiber Optic Upgades 660,000 254,572 264.000 538.572 121,428 FAtl Fiber Optic TeMrel Standardcatbn 325,000 M216 210,000 483216 (158216) SCADACaneurro rse-Etlxanst Sbely 157,000 141 157,000 157,141 (141) Relplaosment of lntaplant Fiber Optics 499000 - 445.000 44.5.000 54,000 yc ndm 20DO N5gratim 333AW - =000 333.000 - Office 200oUpgrs& 69.000 - 69,000 69.000 - SCADASyslem Replarvment Study 310AM - 310.000 310,000 - SCAM Graptf.Tagging Update 670,OW - 458,000 458,000 212,000 Plate 2 Duwatenng PLC SCADA Upgrade 281.000 - 281,000 281.0W - FISUpgrade 1J151,000 - 1.287.00D 112811000 570,ODD InfMmaOon Teciurology,Disaster Recovery 140,000 - 91.ODO 91.00) 49,000 Specialaed Process t4eMak 1W,000 100.00D 100,000 7.00) r Subtotal-PlantA cinafion&Camputerva6on 5SA45,000 14,704,156 11,039.o0D 25,743,156 28,101.844 Process Related Special Projects Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 200,000 433.453 W.000 453,453 (253,453) Thermal lnailagon Managerrmr[Program 80D,000 - 49,000 49,000 751.000 err Plant O&M Manual and SOP Project-Preset 4,000,000 1.330 1.608.000 1.609,330 2,39D.670 Hamdms Energy Centel Procedures 1,19D,000 42414 447.000 48%414 7Dg.SW Managed A4aiNernarrD3 Program mi,000 - 348.0OD 348,000 522000 Special Projects for FY 2D0001: Solids Processing 675,000 7OZ257 258.000 980.267 (216.257) r See Re700-01: Odor CaNd/RegUalay Canpfunce 651,000 1.298.110 651,000 1,949,110 (12W110) Special Projects for FY 2000-2001: Liquid Stieare 215,000 215,000 215,000 Subtotal-Process Raised special Projects e.8m,000 2,477,604 3.988000 6.073,964 %%HAW Mhaollaneees&Support Projects s. Fertile;Engineering Projets-Joint 2D.000,000 889,725 1,042,000 1,917.725 18.068275 Facilbes Engineering projects-PIad2 2D.00D,000 399,933 1,042,000 1,441,933 18,658.057 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 2D.000,000 341,320 1,042000 1,333.320 18616,680 Area aaeeficil Sides 27.919,000 748.814 1.278.000 2,026,814 25.892,186 Strategic Pan-Phase 2 2.194,000 2.008,044 96.000 2,104,044 89,955 Shxlegio Plan Program EJR 1.11%000 817257 33,00D 8502W 258,743 Moddcatorr W Ed ling Mach.Systems 2.694,000 253,822 476.001) 729,822 1.964,178 HJAC Equipment Replacement at Plants Ho.tand2 757.000 - 737,0DO 737,000 20,000 Larrknspe,and Irrigation at Plant Pro.2 810.000 - 128,000 128.000 682,000 Serulty S/stern lmpwements 1,334.000 482.384 383,000 865,394 469.616 Small Cap.Ecpnp.Repacemant Project 740,000 189,408 500,000 689,408 50,592 Warehouse Rmmientlrn Project 6M.000 - 240,000 240.0DO 360,00D Process Safety Management Canpllance Program 3D.000 - 30,000 30.00) Subtotal-MlsceManeous&Support Projects 98,197.000 6.110,707 Tor 000 1A137,707 85oa9293 Water Maral%mant Projects (3aaahvAer RepenisMOM System 178,222,000 2,564.346 2.M,000 4,913,346 173,308,654 s, Water Conservation 4,644,000 953.462 418,000 1.371.462 3,272,538 Long Tenn Pemarent Monitoring Program 5,000,OW 3,359,000 3,358.OD0 1,642,000 Subtotal-Water Minagemae Projects 187.86&000 3.537,808 6,105,000 9.64;808 17M223.192 construction In Progress completed at fi1311,00 507OA6/ 2f14,366 54.394= (54254.83t) Qy Total TraaNwM and Disposal Projects 882,6851000 110,454,899 63,798,197 174.26&096 IMAM$" Capital Equipnard Purchases 2,912,000 2,912,00D 2,912.000 Total Collectors and Treatment&Disposal Projects and capital Equipment Purchases $1,13028g600 9 148,590 W $ 84,355,= $2.12,948.737 $MA33AM Section 3—Page 9 2000-01 First Quarter Report v v v This Page Left Intentionally Blank w Section 3—Page 10 _ Ld Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas'Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review '0 For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Operating Budget Review r 2000-01 Year-To. Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Alloca0ons/Subventions(Sham oft%) $ 34,504,000 $ 2,399,386 $ 32.104,614 6.95% Connection Fees 4.823,000 1,977,464 2,845,536 41.00% Other Fees 74.258,000 75,468 74,1&2,532 0.10% Sale of Capacity Rights 6,340,100 - 6,340,100 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 31,410,000 9,211,928 22,198,072 29.33% r Total Revenues $15l,335,100 $13.664,246 $137,670.854 9.03% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 65,972.000 $ 9,079.005 $ 56,892.995 13.76% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 17.554,000 4,018,812 13,535,188 22.89% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 40.737.000 17,498,983 23,238,017 42.96% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 46,000,000 10,976,059 35,023,941 23.86% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 9,545,000 2,258.193 7,286,807 23.66% Total Outlays $179,808,000 $43,831,052 $135,976,948 24.38% r Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/00 &Additions Fixed Assets 09/30100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 'r Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 14,860,875 $ 4,018,812 $ - $ 18,879.687 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 49,234,085 9,079,005 58,313,090 r Sub-Total 64,094.960 13,097,817 - 77,192.777 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 879,323 - - 879,323 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 174,403.858 - - 174,403.858 Treatment Facilities 9.922 - - 9.922 Disposal Facilities 73,184 - - 73,184 s General Plant and Administrative Facilities 596,943 - - 596.943 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 561,405,033 - - 561,405.033 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 1,125 1,125 r Sub-Total 737.369,388 737,389,388 Total Properly,Plant&Equipment&CIP $801,464,348 $13,097.817 $ $814,562.165 r r Section 4-Page 1 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report W Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 I" Operating Budget Review W 2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 31,046,000 $ 2,208,971 $ 28,837,029 7.12% Connection Fees 4.459,000 1,342,989 3,116,011 30.12% Other Fees 65,541,000 71,137 65,469,863 0.11% Sale of Capacity Rights 2,856,200 - 2,856,200 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 28,312,000 8,378,242 19,933,758 29.59% Total Revenues $132,214,200 $12,001.339 $120,212,861 9.08% v1 OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 58,987,000 $ 7,838,813 $ 49,148,187 13.76% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 15,843,000 3,979.848 11,863,152 25.12% COP Retirement and Interest E)pense 37,735,000 16,240,843 21,494,157 43.04% -- Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 40,742.200 9,741,252 31,000,948 23.91% d Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 7,876,000 1,877,196 5,998,804 23.63% yr Total Outlays $159,183,200 $39,677,952 $119,505,248 24.93% hr Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 07101100 &Additions Fixed Assets 09130/00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 53,575 $ 3,979,848 $ - $ 4,033,423 W Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 7,620,461 7,838,813 15,459,274 Sub-Total 7.674,036 11,818,861 19,492.697 u COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: _. Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 6,903,000 - - 6,903,000 W Treatment Facilities - - -Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 58.241 - - 58.241 v Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 86,894,517 - - 86,894,517 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - Sub-Total 93,948.749 - 93,948,749 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $101,622,785 $11,818,661 $ $113,441,446 W W W Section 4-Page 2 Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review �r For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Operating Budget Review .. 2000-01 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ 3,458,000 $ 190.415 $ 3,267.685 5.51% Connection Fees 364,000 634,475 (270,475) 174.31% Other Fees 8,717,000 1.651 8,715,349 0.02% Sale of Capacity Rights 320,900 - 320,900 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2,156,000 723,200 1,432,800 33.54% Total Revenues $ 15,015,900 $ 1,549,741 $ 13.466,159 10,32% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 6,960.000 $ 956.927 $ 6,003,073 13.75% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 1,123.000 28,759 1,094.241 2.56% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2.840,000 1.202,140 1,637,860 42.33% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,038,800 954.917 3,083.883 23.64% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 1,451,000 313,595 1,137,405 21.61% Total Outlays $ 16,412,800 $ 3,456,338 $ 12,956,462 21.06% .r Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 07/01/00 &Additions Fixed Assets 09130100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 2,484,196 $ 28,759 $ - $ 2.512.955 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 20,435,753 956,927 21,392,680 Sub-Total 22,919,949 985,686 23,905,635 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517.694 s Collection Lines and Pump Stations 96,923,040 - - 96,923,040 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172 r General Plant and Administrative Facilities 218,549 - 216,549 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 233.024,296 - - 233,024,296 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 1,125 1.125 s Sub-Total 330,717,876 330,717,876 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $353,637,825 $ 985,886 $ $354,623,511 r Section 4-Page 3 2000-01 First Quarter Report 1.6 Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review i For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Operating Budget Review 2000-01 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - $ - $ - N/A Connection Fees - - - N/A Other Fees - 2,680 (2,680) N/A Sale of Capacity Rights 3,163,000 - 3,163,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 942,000 110,486 831,514 11.73% _ Total Revenues $ 4,105,000 $ 113,166 $ 3,991,834 2.76% '� OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 2.025.000 $ 283.265 $ 1,741,736 13.99% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 588,000 10,2D5 677.795 1.74% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 162,000 58,000 106,000 34.57% -- Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,219,000 279.890 939.110 22.96% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 218,000 67.402 150,598 30.92% Total Outlays $ 4.212,000 $ 696,762 $ 3,515,238 16.54% r Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance V 07/01100 &Additions Fixed Assets 09130100 .. CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 12,323,104 $ 10205 $ - $ 12,333,309 L Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CHIP 21,177,871 283,265 21,461,136 Sub-Total 33.500,975 293,470 - 33,7947445 'W COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 280.231 - - 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 70,577,818 - - 70,577,818 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 320,153 - - 320,163 V Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 241,486,220 - - 241,486.220 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization Sub-Total 312,702,763 312,702,763 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $346,203,738 $ 293,470 $ $348,497,208 - W 6w 69 Section 4-Page 4 V Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2000-01 Through Through 2000-01 Through Incroaes Budget Oar3012000 09130/2000 Budget 00130119H Decrease r 1. Beginning Reserves $1,531,700 $1,809,121 WA wA $1,592,701 $216,420 Revenues 2. In-Cleo Premiums 1,248,500 311,825 25% 934,875 375,000 (83,375) 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 50,000 23.500 47.00% 26,500 19,120 4,380 yr 4. Allocation from Other Funds 700.000 11,161 1.59% 688,839 62,867 (51.506) S. Total Revenues 11996,500 346.286 17.34% 1,650,214 456,787 110,501 Exoensea r 6. Benefits/Claim 300.000 11,434 3.81% 288,566 11,445 (11) 7. Contractual Services 3,500 888 25.37% 2,612 300 588 r S. Legal Services 500,000 89,126 17.83% 410.874 137.146 (48,020) 9. Professional Servloes 3,000 3,956 131.87% (958) 12,000 (8,044) r 10. Supplies&Other 500 - 0.00% 500 - - 11. Service Department Allocation 1,000,000 411,189 41.12% 588,811 176,52D 234,669 r 12. Subtotal Expenses 1,807,000 516,693 28.59% 1,290,407 337.411 179.182 13. Excess Loss Policy 112,000 25.192 22A9% 86,808 27,873 (2,681) 14, Total Expenses 1.919,000 541,785 28.23% 1,377,215 365,284 176.501 r 15. Fxeess Revenue(Pxpenses) 77,500 (195,499) -25228% 272,999 91,503 281 7.002) 10. Ending Reserves 1 809 200 1 813 822 100.27% N/A 1 684 204 70 5 2 r r Section 5-Page 1 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30,2000 I" Percent i_j Actual or Budget Remaining Actual 2000-01 Through Through 2000-01 Through Increase Budget 09/3012000 091=000 Budget 09/30/1999 (Decrease) V 1. Beginning Reserves $336,600 $302,064 WA WA $812,383 $(510,319) Revenues u 2. In-Lieu Premiums 310,000 77,500 25.00% 232,500 77,500 - 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 25,000 11.575 46.30% 13,425 9,836 1,739 W 4. Total Revenues 335.000 89,075 26.59% 245,925 87,336 1,739 W Expenses 5. Benefits/Claims 250,000 50,204 20.08% 199,796 86.567 (36,363) `►I 6. Contractual Services 25,000 8,091 32.36% 16,909 6,250 1,841 7. Legal Services 30,000 1,823 6.08% 28,177 5,047 (3,224) V 8. Pmlessional Services 35,000 - - 35,000 25.636 (25,636) 9. Supplies&Other - - WA - - - 10. Service Department Allocations 50,000 20,094 40.19% 29,906 61,200 (41,106) 11. Subtotal Expenses 390,000 80,212 20.57% 309,788 184,700 (104,488) 6' 12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 6,156 27.36% 16,344 5,024 1,132 W 13. Total Expenses 412,500 86.368 20.94% 326,132 189,724 103,356 14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) 77,500 2.707 -3A9% 80,207 10f 2.388) 105,095 1& Ending Reserves 259100 $304,771 117.63% WA 709995 $(405.224) I W i b Section 5-Page 2 -- u Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE s, General Management Administration (Division 110) 4*Pertormanceotfve 2660.0T' 'P�eff`orrBance Target Through3l,Mon4hs y Summary of Data. Ensure treatment mat does $514/MG $474/MG Costs below Gallonage charge due to not exceed target by and of expenses being at 23.86%for first three d fiscal year months. Furthermore flows are higher by 2.79%compared to original budget projections thus impacting gallonage charge. r Ensure District meets 510 FTEs by end 499 FTEs As of 9130100. Includes outstanding job adopted staffing plan of fiscal year offers. Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. `+ with Permit Compliance Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 20.3% Tracking well over that 3-months. See the (capital projects)CORE Engineering section for further. Budget by end of year Ensure District Performance 80% 73%Performance Performance objectives have nearly been met Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives dudng the first three months. Workplan r milestones met within Objectives 61%Workplan milestone tasks are behind in some areas, targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see which has been typical of our 1"quarter Milestones Summary) performance over the last several years. Oftentimes unforeseen technical or administrative dgficulties impact milestones but don't Impact ultimate deadlines. 142 ~ 54 33 17 4 `81%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled through 3 months of FV 00/01 were completed. Please see individual division sections for additional details on activities behind schedule. r `.I r Section 6-Page 1 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Administration (Division 210) W 2000=Oil Pe noe Trarget yk. a W 1x sr,,., r Tlllro ollth8 „ S a vSu me r. � , u Average Rate of Rehm 6.05% 6.98% Target exceeded. - on Liquid Portfolio Index 60 Average Rate of Return 10.55% 9.57% Performance fell behind benchmark in July and on Long-term Portfolio Sept.because of underweighted allocations to Index corporate notes,investments in mortgage- backed securities and an above Index duration. w Average Interest rate paid 3.57% 3.59% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark — on variable(COP) missed by 2-polms,has Interest rates exceeded borrowing benchmark in one month of quarter. V General liability cost:% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. -- premiums compared to .60% .20% Operating Budget y Worker's Comp insurance — cost: %premiums 1.49% .11% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met compared to payrollIiC W W 2 2 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. Ld W V W tw V tw Section 6-Page 2 L Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting(Division 220) sP`@([Pf� ,PRI ybfSiff 200041 t,15RWO` NP..e'fomtpog6,3 ;,�y {`7 . 1 t•.... 9 !y r 'c a Throy�hY3{I�o kh .,d ! >,I ����;Sumlda in maw Issue monthly financial 92% 100% Target met. reports within 10 working r days FIS OneWodd training 90%End Users 0% AwatOrp OneWodd implementation. program Trained r Update cost-allocation 100%by year end 0% This work to be completed in 2nd and 3rd study quarter. Complete review of 3,200 100%by year end 25% On target for year-end goal. properties on septic r I �1Mq�kPa!t��9Kay a !^Rid Pl1°< 7Gi a r 1st"Quettat'. Complets �`Bshind ? :Summaryiof'Data 4 3 1 0 Sewer fee refund.not expedited by County. Task will be brought in-house. r r r r r r r Section 6-Page 3 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report W FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) r zFe9drtnande Obtectrve 09t' Tr ig` 3` 4rY@1 r r ummary 'P Da�`faj'(I h4a Maintain cycle count 97%-Accuracy 99.27% 3-month cycle counting program met pmgmm Rating benchmark target. Complete by On-target Program milestones on-target. Develop technical 6/01 specification training program y Develop procurement card Complete by Board approved full Program milestones on-target. metncs 6101 program Phase III DART warehouse Complete by On-hold Currently on hold due to CMMS technical L. project 6101 difficulties. Inventory stock-out program Complete by Report run Report run to change stock-out min/max v review 6101 levels. Adjustments being made In Financial Information System. _ �f +ayx:Y�{f��,F4` r3 { m i:tr 1pw�. rc1 1 ru�F j S zf lA�' Nn ¢tr ?. 5 4 1 0 Phase III DART project behind schedule. -- W V V V W I 60 I 6w Section 6-Page 4 bw Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications(Division 310) ,iPari�otmance'QbJ�cW1e tit? �0S 1r:u.. iUr o4man�ce` �'�, �r �� r - target "''., "RhrougTapMon s+, + Zmmayyfaf,Data Agenda Package 6 day tumamund 100% Target achieved. turnaround time 100%of time r Board minute preparation 10 day 100% Target Achieved. turnaround time turnaround 100%of time r Photocupying services 93%+ N/A N/A:2n°Quarter Objective. satisfaction r Graphics services 95%+ N/A NIA:2n°Quarter Objective. satisfaction Visitor our satisfaction 85%+ N/A N/A:2n0 Quarter Objective. rating r v sk 3tY,V.P �s'Ks' 9 , t r =�sfYUuarler, '" CoV w��e1`iln�d )'R°f r �ti',f ` ��i a ° - 't'�✓A `" "a'ria,� mp � !ti , v=1 ainmary,.a 0 0 0 0 N/A this quarter. r r r r r r r r Section 6-Page 5 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report 6.1 HR & EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Divisions 510) KoloW.qhce,Objective 2000-01 Pert orrinance. Target Through 3ilitdohliiihii pi L Achieve mandatory training 98% N/A NIA 1"qtr. No mandatory training offered. attendance Exceed National 86% 42% 42%of employees received training in first benchmark for% quarter. This%vAll increase as training employees tralini continues in subsequent quarters. Achieve in-house training 5,75-out of 7 6.45 out of 7 Target exceeded. evaluation rating Ensure Department budget 90%-100% Employee Development Target met through 3 months. 4 managed within 90%-100% =25% of proposed. HR= 12% Ensure Department 90% 100% Target met. achieves 90%+of budget performance objecifive; 'T lak IRM 1" 4. x 2 2 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. I . 6a Section 6- Page 6 6w Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT r Technical Services Administration (Division 610) :P.ertormance Ob)ectNe - : 2000-017'arget '�eyformance= "� � 'tThrouph3 S6mmaryofAata ,. .. 'N(onths ., Ensure divisions' 85%+ 90% Exceeds benchmark target. .: performance objectives are met. Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 610-16.82% Overall department budget tracking at less .r expendltures are managed 620-25.45% than 25%through 3 months based on 630-24.66% division performance. 640-23.42% 650.26.8% r _ Yl�orkplan Tasks i Mo' q " +' .:! ` ;•. Q�55i{er '^,"Com'lete fa rr 1B'e to t,t A p' q.,_ , v.� ., , SGmmary oflUaYa r 0 0 0 0 N/A this quarter. r r r r r r Section 6-Page 7 2000-01 First Quarter Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring(Division 620) is Paformenee'Objective,i. 2000401 Target 'Performance ' Through 3 Summary,ol"Data W Months Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target met. core ocean monitoring ly sampling Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met. reports/data submitted on W time Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met. reported on time. hg i i 1IVoi'�(glan Tas)(S«+ar „ 11st Quarter 'I Complete f ,.d3eA�nd Started .'Summary of:Data 2 2 0 0 W Scheduled Tasks Completed. 6a is , I V I �Y 64 Iv W Section 6-Page 8 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Sciences Laboratory(Division 630) 13erforhnance.Objec6ve 2600-01: Performance — i- Target,. Ttirotigh 3•Months i$ummarjr n#!Data Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 113%overall lab Target met. testing productivity attabove — Multi-agency benchmark parameters. Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 98%for Metals& Evaluating why targets not met this quarter, — testing productivity within norm Geneml Chem. although benchmark has been increased 10%of FY 99/00 in-house 87%for Organic Chem. since last year. productivity standard. 74%for Microbiology .y Quality Assurance Testing 95%conect on 113%on I analysis Target met. on laboratory samples I° analysis, — 100%on 2"t Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 97%Jury Target met. analyses established 98%Aug. - norm 97%Sept � i k k l s 0 0 0 0 WA this quarter. - - r Section 6-Page 9 2000-01 First Quarter Report 6w TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control (Division 640) W IAC \➢ 0.v y t 111 fR ..performance Objective 2000.OrA„1�dp 7� y§�3 '; i u; '��r t i u'0ili � Y "6r1 � if 7argeR , I T opths ,§omma V of. Maintain field Inspection 2.7 monitoring 2.75 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods data is for An quarter of FV 99/00. y Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions most targeted goal. actions within 30 days of non-compliance event u Issue Industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals most targeted goal permits prior to expiration Evaluate SAWPA 100%on-time 100% completed Targets met. V pretreatment program . . t Complete revisions to 100%by 6/01 100%milestones met Milestone targets met. y Wastewater Discharge Regulations . . Develop pretreatment O&M 100%by 6/01 100%milestones met Milestone targets met. rj training program Workplan Tasks' , 6�t d df r , ?!,ut 8 �i 1,� 1st Quarter Complete - r,Behl¢U; �!� + N " � W 1 1 0 0 Scheduled Tasks Completed. L L j W L L Section 6-Page 10 L Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Safety&Emergency Response(Division 680) Perforrhand 10' 3, Umma 0 a, Achieve 100%attendance 100% 100% Target met. for mandatory safety training Ensure Injury Incidence Is 8.5 incidence 9.6 Target nearly met. See below. 24%below industry rate average, Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 7.6 Ten accidents in first quarter,eight of which Incidence Rate 42%below rate were classified as lost work day cases. industry average Workers Compensation $403 $60 Injuries that occurred did not have Cost Factor 30%below significant medical costs although. industry a"rage a its ;A , 7 A Ak car 0 0 0 0 N/A this quarter. Section 6-Page 11 2000-01 First Quarter Report ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Division 7110/720•) u Performance Ob/ective. 2000-01.� . performance 7argeS TFirdugh`3 MgnShs : `Summaryiofipata - Manage Capital Projects 80%+ 20.3%through that $11.8 mil spent versus$58.3M CORF Budget expended by quarter CORF/Collections system budget. year's and Staff Utilization Rate for 70%+of time 66% Approaches target. Lower due to vacation Project Managers and holiday time. W Meet design project 80%+of time 79% Approaches target benchmark as 22/28 milestones project milestones completed. Meet Division 710/720/730 Less than 17.8%for Div 710 Target met for first 3 months. u JO budgets 100% 22.9%for Div 720 expended 21.8%for Dlv730 Respond to envimnmental 100%of time 100% Target met. r correspondence within 30 working days V .Wnrl�ilefl'TaskB k�yi � sn sty it �'I� 'RYA�jfJ�+ r ik �;�� i ifr '^i Nr Nyi ,* � 1sf Qularter Comglete'' "BeJrled `" 'Summary ofAatAh' 1' ' 6 4 2 0 Two Internal effectiveness projects slightly behind schedule. V *Note that Engineering Admn.and Planning&Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes. W L 1 V IYe u Section 6-Page 12 u Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .. Construction Management(Division 730) 'Perfprrn ee Objective 2000.1,11? P,effortnance , � n :$ummarpr cf-Data Targets Throub SuodthS` Target Change Order costs 5% 2.759/6 Change order costs are always based on a at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four original contract amount quarters. Target has been met (industry standard=7.25%) Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 60%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a Occupancy in facilities days 40%-240 days running average of the preceding four within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target was achieved based days on the rolling average utilizing 15 projects. Conduct Quality Control 8%or less 2% Target has been met based on QC Inspections and average no Inspections. more 8%correctable deficiencies r Staff Utilization Rate for 75%+of time 71% Approaches target Lower due to vacation Project Managers for CIP and holiday lime. r Conduct submittal reviews 801Y.of lime or 97% Target has been exceeded. within date Identified greater r i A a TnF�i4yyy o- t I -' _ e $1�IfO,fal1`798fr8 �M1 ``,� z ,r Mst�Qua'rter Complete!;i -Bph�inrl StarteU*1 J, `�' ummaryfti'fAata, -11 4 3 1 0 One project delayed to be conducted in 3" quarter. r r r r r .r Section 6-Page 13 r 2000-01 First Quarter Report W OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Administration(Division 810) V s Performance Objective: 000-0Ti('ro' • 4 ruyd"t Nkl p I� ,z ' Target .Q pn mhE '.pfta , Ensure Operations $385/million $361/million gallons Target met. treatment cost per million gallons treated treated gallons does not exceed y target Ensure O&M division 96-100% 101.96% (annualized) Annualized target near budgeted budget's managed within expenditures. W appropriated expenditures Ensure Total Injury 12.2 6.6 Target met. Frequency remains below (or leas) W Industry average Ensure staffing plan figures 252.75 FfEs by 249 FTEs Target met. are met end of year y YVotkplan Tasks Nptq V :1st+Quaiter �Com"pieta S- B•e'hGf `�',r ,S,mited;,��r Is . . t' OM ♦ CM :-r�i'. 0 0 0 0 NIA this quarter. IV L L I.J I V V Id L V Section 6-Page 14 L r Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT r Operations&Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 820/870') R,grto4raapce"O edBKe �Ti4ioit h �IVlontbs',> "rSummary"o''�ata Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100% Total contracts Natural gas units are twice the amount biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 116%for expected. Ferric chloride bids were higher r contracts are managed 3-month period than expected. within budget (annualized). Ensure milestones are 80%+of time 100% Project milestones met. completed on assigned projects Respond to Engineering 90%within 100% Target met r Capital Project Review deadline Requests Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.43 Target met. kilowatt hour($(kWh) Maintain therms/kWh at .111 therms/kWh .106 thenns/kWh- Within targeted parameters. Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 r (kilowatt hour)within .106 therms/kWh .093 therms/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2 Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 59.5% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit r Central Generation plants requirements. within targeted limits r 4� � Vot„ + ,e 11 ,kn �"r Vr r'' .�, 1st ' ,. Quarf<er+� .s , ; Comp'/`ere".J Bdfilnd;m SYartedp "�`,,,v ,SiumrparyEof'� ta, ` - r .. _ ...-. . o.N. 4 3 D 1 1 I.T.delaying one project `Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. r r r r r r Section 6-Page 15 2000-01 First Quarter Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 8301840) ;66 Ali) Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 75%Plant I Target met. Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 70%Plant 2 Process Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 43%,at Plant 1 40%Plant I Problems related to PI trickling (BOD)Removal Targets In Primary 45%>at Plant 2 42%Plant 2 filter process areas impacting W Treatment Process performance. Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 12.8%Plant I Higher than expected at P2 due total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 28%Plant 2 to lover than authorized targets 5 hours leave staffing levels. taken) 25%at Plant 2 6w Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 4.6%Plant 1 Costs nearing maximum does not exceed targets salary 7.7%Plant 2 benchmark at P2. 6W .114 it OVA' 2 1 1 0 Behind on development of details for cross,training 6w program. IL Lr 6. L Section 6-Page 18 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT _ O&M Maintenance Divisions(Divisions 8501860) ^ �n< effonn;in gObectivs 2000-0tTak et gpeff"aec'V J ) '� Thrbugh53Mon'fhsl •Sommary�of'Dafen Ensure 45%Wrench Time 45% 40.3% Commitment to project-related activities, in Mechanical Maintenance particularly J-42,minvendon and capital r Division project support,reduces direct vaench time percentages. Ensure 45%Wrench Time 45% 41.3% Commitment to project-related activities, in Electrical& particularly J42,reinvention and capital Instrumentation Division project support,reduces direct wrench time percentages. Ensure 55%Wrench 55% 46.6% Time/Direct Support Time See above. in Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 55%Wrench 55% 49.3% See above. Time/Direct Support Time in Electrical& r Instrumentation Division Ensure preventive <90% 51% Target met. maintenance backlog in r Mechanical Maintenance is less then 90% Ensure preventive <90% 62.2% Target met. maintenance backlog in Electrical&Instrumentation Is less than 90% ti 1 rNU I a4Au t I d �I�IOrkpJ;} T"'eke J� I. n �l•' .3 C Illf{t Ott + r ;; �1ePQYsrter Complete it Behind +'( ` A ,+�, ;, $ummaryo Data ' 6 2 4 0 Internal projects related to reinvention and ,r J-42 have been delayed. r r Section 6-Page 17 2000-01 First Quarter Report W OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Air Quality&Special Projects(Division 880) vu Perfgrmagce ObJeabva00 p1� ° 1 iTthroug ., r x Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 10D% Performance objective is on target deadlines W Ensure collections sulfide 80-100% On-track Currently backing properly through 3 control managed within months. budget W Ensure PSAlcontractual 80-100% On-track Currently tracking properly through services managed within months. budget p W sj: 'f id9,vP �r A I'1N0[r !' x q( ldtt�ualtar L'omplete`i Beh7nd Sfartedj w� �{; 1 , , 3 1 2 0 Odor and biosolids projects slightly behind L schedule. W L I W L j W V L iW Section 6- Page 18 W Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Facilities/Collections Divisions(420/430•) "Objective - 2000=01 Target-, Rgrtormance ' Through3 surnrft,of Data Months Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 84% Target met. r Pump Stations meets or exceeds target Ensure that collections 90%+spots 62% Staff diverted to CIP-related tasks. ,r trouble spots are cleaned on maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench Ume 57% High levels of vacation/sick leave impacting e, Fleet Maintenance Division this quarter's wrench time. meets or exceeds target Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time High levels of vawtion/sick leave impacting Rebuild Shop meets or �% this quarters wrench time. exceeds target Ensure planned/prevenUve 70%Planned& 46%Preventive Change In philosophy in documenting PM/CM — maintenance to wmcUve Preventive 54%Corrective tasks in Fleet Services. maintenance ratios meets Maintenance targets 30%Corrective Maintenance a 'rf @ .1 IGN s 1 t r w kr^r el �. a avy^iy� k. �, :ate r4- r � � _ 8 '�,`. 54 ♦iii i1 .� ddr3,„, p 1�ry..y� �a A"! M awx yl�' i i r y"A r 42 N arter l5nComp/ete, Behmd '1 3Yer '`I til,� ? ,.SNmmpr,'y'ofiDatel i 7 3 2 2 Delays on task due to direction from upper management. 'Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6- Page 19 2000-01 First Quarter Report 6W INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT (Divisions 910193019401950-) Desktop obsolescence Replace 25%of On-target Target met. program computers annually Database, "Up-Omer 95%+ 99.59% Target met. Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met. ,up-11mer plants 100%=Plant2 AWN, efi1 141". 5 2 2 1 Some internal project delayed due to resource issues and minor technical difficulties. w ;Note that Information Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. LW L L i.0 Section 6-Page 20 Orange County Sanitation District (714 ) 962-2411 www • ocsd • com mailing address : P • O . Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address : 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley , California 92708-7018 OCSD 09/30/00 DRAFT v MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County sanitation District Wednesday, November 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 8, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair Shawn Boyd John M. Gullixson Shirley McCracken Joy L. Neugebauer STAFF PRESENT: James W. Silva Peer Swan Blake Anderson, General Manager Nonn Eckenrode, Board Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Jan Debay, Past Board Chair David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources OTHERS PRESENT: Mike White, Controller Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Collins, Human Resources Analyst Don Hughes Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Tom Dawes Analyst Bob Geggie Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Ryal Wheeler Manager Mike Moreland Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Greg Giles Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLICCOMMENTS There were no public comments. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 November 8, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the October 11, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meetings. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that one of the District's fire, Flood and earthquake insurance carriers, Reliance Insurance Company, has been down-graded to Best rating "C". Reliance has 12 'hYo of the coverage. To replace the coverage with a company rated "A"would cost an additional $166,000 in premium. Robert Driver, the District's broker, and staff recommend that the District not pay the additional premium as the District would have a priority claim on any bankruptcy proceedings if Reliance fails to pay any claims. Mr. Streed then reported on opportunities with long-tern investment agreements on debt service reserve funds. It was recommended that staff prepare a written report for the next committee meeting outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the long-term agreements. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources referred the Directors to charts distributed to them that evening per Director Gullixson's request on the cost of salaries and benefits to all employees, as well as the impact of increased employee benefits/wages to the user fee rates. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on the legislative Bill, recently enacted, regarding increasing Directors' compensation for attendance at meetings or for each days service for the District. This issue will be placed on the Steering Committee agenda for information as the first step towards adopting the necessary Ordinance as previously directed by the Board. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Director McCracken requested Item 10(e) be pulled for discussion. a. FAHR00-81: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2000. b. FAHR00-82: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR00-83: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of October 25, 2000. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting 9 Page 3 November 8, 2000 d. FAHR00-84: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive and file the First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending September 30, 2000. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a) through (d) under Consent Calendar. e. FAHR00-91: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2000 through September 30, 2000. Director McCracken submitted written questions from the City of Anaheim Treasurer to Gary Streed, Director of Finance, with regard to the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report. It was requested the submitted questions and staffs response to the questions be included as an informational item in next month's committee package. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR00-85: Recommend to Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00- Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Create Limited Tenn contract Engineer classification at pay range E13 ($67,122 - $94,929); (2) Create Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($50,068-$70,847); and (3) Reinstate approved positions of Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic from the FY99100 budget at a proposed cost of$5,533. Inactivate the Collection Facilities Worker I and II classifications. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR0M6: Recommend to Board of Directors to receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2000, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR00-87: Leadership Training for Management Lisa Arosteguy, Senior Human Resources Analyst, gave a brief report on the leadership training program for management. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 November 8, 2000 b. FAHROO-88: Not used C. FAHR00-89 Groundwater Replenishment System Director Peer Swan gave a slide presentation and overview of the Groundwater Replenishment System project (GWRS). He also gave a brief presentation of suggested opportunities he is recommending to reduce project implementation risks and costs through a three-phase process. d. FAHR00-90 US EPA's proposed regulations on Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) of sanitary sewer systems Nick Arhontes spoke to the Directors regarding new EPA regulations that will be published for final public comment that have significant financial impacts on all public agencies that own sanitary sewer systems. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for December 13, 2000 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: q� P nny M. I a FAHR Com ittee Sec ary H WP ftMp VAk RW in.%110B]]GNW MINWc BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeng Dete ro 14100 x a e. wwroD AGENDA REPORT teemNam6C ]OemNumbe I6 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Barbara Collins, Senior O&M Analyst SUBJECT: AWARD OF FERRIC CHLORIDE CONTRACT, SPECIFICATION NO, C-147 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-039 with Kemiron Pacific, Inc., ending November 30, 2000, providing for an increase of$275,000 to the contract for a total amount not to exceed $2,400,368.75; and (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award a contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc. at a unit price of$316.79 including sales tax and delivery, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $2,400,368.75. SUMMARY Ferric chloride is used in the wastewater treatment facilities as a coagulant to enhance settling in the primary processes and for sulfide control in the digester gas. The treatment plants use an estimated 7500 dry tons of chemicals each year. Fourteen vendors received request for bids. Five did not respond and seven vendors did not bid. Bids were received from two vendors; the bids ranged from $318.94/ton to $316.79/ton. (See attached bid tabulation.) Based on the lowest bid unit cost, the estimated annual use is $2,375,925. In addition to seeking approval of a new contract, staff is requesting an increase to the current contract that ends November 30, 2000. The treatment facilities have seen an increased demand for chemical resulting from flow increases such as urban runoff diversions and higher than anticipated flows from Santa Ana Watershed Protection Authority, among others. For example, urban runoff from the Santa Ana River and start- up flows from a SAWPA desalter project were diverted into the District system during the summer months. The current contract, also with Kemiron, in the amount of $2.125,368.75 must be increased by $275,000 in order to cover increased chemical demand in the treatment plant. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The current contract for the chemical expires November 30, 2000. The lowest bid for the new contract period is $316.79 per dry ton, an 11.8% increase over the current contract cost. The bid prices were higher than projected during the budget process H 1xy Jh�sBenleVkeNPperge flemn<LLW]Bw,GRpmlafle{ab111CpJbm ta.lrc Page 1 and it is anticipated that expenditures will exceed budget amounts. The chemical cost increase results from increases in the cost of chlorine, one of the chemicals used to make ferric chloride, as well as increases in trucking resulting from higher fuel prices. District staff budgeted $ 2,050,000 for this fiscal year. Based on the bid prices, staff estimates the District will spend $ 325,395 over budget amount. Staff is currently experimenting with altemalive chemical in order to reduce expenditures and contain costs. Budget amounts for next fiscal year will be adjusted accordingly. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Hem: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS Bid Tabulation Sheet Htwp.NatgandaNand Agenda RepnaQ000 B al Agenda RepnftM Vhm 16doe Page BID PRICE TABULATION PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE SPECIFICATION NO.C447 Bid Opening: October 17, 2000 Bidder Total Delivered Price per dry ton Kemiron Pacific Inc.(Kemwater) $316.79 Beta Control Systems $318.94 Commerce Chemical Company NO BID Eaglebrook, Inc. NO BID GW International(Western States Chemical ) NO BID Jones Chemical NO BID Pressure Vessel Service, Inc.(Basic Chemical Solutions) NO BID Sierra Chemical Company NO BID US Filter NO BID All Pure Chemical Company(Pioneer) NO RESPONSE Ashland Specialty Chemicals NO RESPONSE Drew Industrial Division Holchem, Inc. NO RESPONSE US Filter(Corporate HQs) NO RESPONSE Van Waters&Rogers NO RESPONSE We have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. We, therefore, recommend award to KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. in the bid amount of$316.79 as the lowest ar)d best bid. arc Dubas, C.P.M. Contracts/Purchasing Manager /0 ! 7- Date H\wpdWrin MBids&Contrac %k-V BOARD AWARD BidsTwrd C bid 147 Fwc ChlondeWD PRICE TABULATION 2.dw