Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-08-23
August 15, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ^homai NOTICE OF MEETING (714)962-2411 selling a Be.6127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Faaetain Mall CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9272B-8127 108444 Ellis Avenue WEDNESDAY, August 23, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. Fountain Valley,CA 9R708JO1B DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies • Cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Buena Perk Cypress Fountain Uallay Pollarron Garden Orove Huntington Beach and e Secres rvie r L. Habrca Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beech Orange Pcus Ben B ant An. Tentatively - Scheduled Uocomino Meetings Seal Beach S anion Pero Ville Perk b OMITS COMMITTEE -Wednesday,September 5, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. Yorba Linda County of orange PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, September 6,2000 at 5:00 p.m. FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, September 12,2000 at 5:00 p.m. Santa" Districts Costa Mess JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Midway city SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, September 18,2000 at 5:30 p.m. Water Districts @OCWD o-uine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,September 26, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. 'To Protect the Public Haunch and me Environment through Excellence 11 Wastewater Systems' 4T BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting September September 27, 2000 October October 25, 2000 November 'November 15, 2000 December 'December 20, 2000 January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 June June 27, 2001 July 'July 18, 2001 August August 22, 2001 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month Bivip.Ela�dmiMBSNgendaQOOID Meeting Nolice9MN82.doc AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING August 23, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, It will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 08/23/00 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on July 19, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 07/15/00 07/31/00 Totals $4,437,579.48 $17,711,875.43 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. O8/23/00 Page 3 f NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re August 23, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 19, 2000 to be filed. C. Approve an increase from the current$3,000 IDEA Program maximum award amount to $10,000 maximum award amount for approved IDEAS that offer significant cost savings. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Diversion Permit and Financing re August 2, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF DIVERSION PERMIT AND FINANCING MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Diversion Permit and Financing Minutes for the meeting held on August 2, 2000 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re August 3, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 3, 2000 to be filed. C. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$15,682,000 for Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, for a total project budget not to exceed $16,907,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for an amount not to exceed $300,000. d. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1- 37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$511,045 for a total amount not to exceed $3,578,324. e. Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J- 42, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$1,896,186, for a total amount not to exceed $7,495.779. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $3,332,829. 08/23/00 Page 4 14. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 2000. 15. (1)Authorize the General Manager to approve additional funds of$133,000 for caustic soda chemical used for disinfecting and odor abatement; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award contract for Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. 2000/01R01 Rebid, to GW International (Western States)for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $470,300. 16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re July 31, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on July 15, 17 and 31, 2000 to be filed. 17. Recess by Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District. 18. Call to Order, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation a. Roll Call 19. a. Presentation re Proposed 2000 Refunding of Certificates of Participation. b. Adopt Resolution No. FG01, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to the Execution and Delivery of Orange County Sanitation District Refunding Certificates of Participation, Series 2000, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of such Certificates Evidencing Principal in an Aggregate Amount of not to exceed $230,000,000, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, and Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions 20. Adjourn, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation 21. Reconvene, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District 08/23/00 Page 5 22. Authorize General Manager to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder for Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-41, and related equipment purchase in a total amount not to exceed $150,000. 23. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in dosed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. Al such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with District's Labor Negotiators (Human Resources Representative and General Manager) re salaries, benefits, terns and conditions of employment for employees represented by IUOE- Local 501 and SPMT Unit(Government Code Section 54957.6) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session 24. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 25. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 26. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 11.wp.dl gentl Swfd Agmdasr201)0 Board AgerM 5M2300.doo ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 08/23/00 TIME: :00 (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................-.,z _ _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD...................—'L — (LARSON) ....................... BOYD............................ �L — (CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. _-,! ✓ — (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... 1dc ls� — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... ✓ _ (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE.....................1.. — (MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE.................�� _L — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN.................... �L — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... �� _L — (RYAN)............................. GULLIXSON.................... ,L — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... — (RICE/EVANS).................. NEUGEBAUER.............. �� ✓ (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. JL ,�Q�PLaEe—Sst S/� (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. � i — — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... f� — (MAULLER)...................... SIGLER......................... �L ✓ — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... 1bc — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... ✓ ✓ (DEBOLT)......................... SYLVIA........................._�✓ — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... �� 7 — STAFF: Anderson /1 Ghirelli �/rQ K le Lw�wrn- ✓ Miles Ooten ✓ Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon 07/19/00 H:\wp.MaWdminSSUIRECTOR'Directm Rol Cell.dx SIGN-IN SHEET GORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 6 f a3 IOU BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) Ese E 4AA/6 6AQ944i axJ,C ocs H 9WP.DTAWDMIW&TORMSI IGN W FORM.DOC 49 WAYS TO REGISTER Sewage spills are a hot topic for the public and public service Fax: Fill out the attached form and agencies. Especially when fax to (714) 962-2591 they result in a beach closure. Email: Email your registration information to Spill Prevention dhunter@ocsd.comThis workshop is a must for and Response Attn: Deirdre Hunter first responders to sewage spills. Orange County Sanitation District Workshop 2000 or Phone: (714) 593-7459 for more information Cost: FREE! Lunch is also provided DISCUSSIONS INCLUDE Registration Deadline: Sept. 8, 2000 Name and Title: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 e What is my role as a first responder 7.30 a.m. — 2.30 p.m. to a sewage spill? orgenieatlon: • What are other agencies roles? pretended by and held at: • What do the regulators expect? Address: --_ Orange County Sanitation District • Who am I required to notify? ciy. _ _ 10844 Ellis Avenue e How do I protect storm drains Email: --- Fountain Valley, CA 92708 and contain the spill? Plains: e How can I help prevent sewage spills Fax: and beach closures? Names and Tides of other people from your agency standing: e What are some public outreach -- ------- - programs and information available? Workshop Location: This is a free workshop ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT L , Administration Building but seating is limited! $ Boardroom ' ]I 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 You must pre-register (714)962-2411 by September 8 2000! m gga sing smmanmasay it,r r ® eun at Euelltl,5o abelda re u / e vel,enter mein geu. (lunch Is provided) ^^°^ 'Protecting the public health corns Hannonrn doe Tree , and the environment through meas s"ater saim ndlr, excellence in water resource Iurn sit cry ener amerces aim Ian an algal,ewer mas gate. management systems." OBJECTIVES AGENDA is Learn about current and upcoming 7:30 a.m. Check In -Pre-registration required sewage spill regulatory requirements - Minimum mandatory penalties 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks - State water Sued sewage spill database Session 1 Regulatory Perspectives - cMOM(capaciy,Management,Operations 8:30 a.m. Mark Adelson, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Surveillance/ and Maintenance) Enforcement Division - Notification requirements Larry Honeyboume, Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Karen Ashby, County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, • Learn about spill prevention through Watershed& Coastal Resources Division planning, design and construction of public works projects 10:15-10:30 a.m. Break • Review onsite spill response objectives Session 2 Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Perspectives in Prevention, and techniques 10:30 a.m. Response, and Notifications • Review the roles of spill responders Dave Ludwin, Engineering Department for local public works, fire and law Nick Arhontes, Collections Facilities Operations and Maintenance Division enforcement agencies, sanitary districts Deirdre Hunter, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division Adrienne Renescu, Source Control DMsion is Learn about the No. 1 cause of sewage spills-grease Noon-1:00 p.m. Lunch (provided) is Learn about the next generation of spill Session 3 Spill Response Case Studies notifications and use of technology 1:00 P.M. Rob Hamers, Costa Mesa Sanitary District is Discuss interagency cooperation and 1:20 p.m. Regulatory Updates and OCSD Outreach Program spill response case studies Patrick McNally, OCSD, Collections Facilities Operations and Maintenance Div. Take part in a panel discussion- 1:40 p.m. Laguna Beach Fire Department's Role in Spill Response opportunities to get your Steve May, City of Laguna Beach questions answered! 2:00-2:30 p.m. Panel Discussion -Q&A with presenters and closing remarks • SHOULDATTEND? Sewage Spill and First Responders: Sponsored by: Local City Public Works Fire Departments - Fur mon Monutbn us n muY: sewage spills can petemialh Deirdre Hunter EnforcementLaw _ cause long-te,m aamago to the I Orange County Sanitation District Districts w ID emnment.Help prevent eml (714)593-7459 Sanitarydhunter@ocsd.corn WAYS TO REGISTER Sewage spills are a hot topic 1 for the public and public service Fax: Fill out the attached form and agencies. Especially when fax to (714) 962-2591 they result in a beach closure. Email: Email your registration information to Spill Prevention This workshop is a must for dhunter@ocsd.com and Response Attn: Deirdre Hunter first responders to sewage spills. Orange County Sanitation District Workshop 2000 or Phone: (714) 593-7459 for more information Cost: FREE! Lunch is also provided "41141a DISCUSSIONS INCLUDE Registration Deadline: Sept. 8, 2000 Name and The: - _ Tuesday, September 26, 2000 • What is my role as a first responder 7.30 a.m. — 2.30 p.m. to a sewage spill? organization: • What are other agencies roles? pr¢s¢nletl by and held at: • What do the regulators expect? Address: _ Orange County Sanitation District • Who am I required to notify? City: zip Cede 10844 Ellis Avenue • How do I protect stoml drains Email: _- ___- _ _ Fountain Valley, CA 92708 and contain the spill? Phone: • How can I help prevent sewage spills Fac and beach closures? Names and Titles of other people from your agency attending: • What are some public outreach programs and information available? Workshop Location: This is a free worksho ORANGE COONS P SANITATION DISTRICT but seating is limited! Administration Building i Boardroom 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 You must pre-register (714)962-2411 r W, C50 acne Umh cn the 405 heamr,, by September 8, 2000! 8 Pat come.a. Inemltes1 e1 "Protecting the public health (lunch is provided) """' cdeg harm on m.405 fr.",, and the environment through mas Euclid.Wm right, excellence in water resource edutey arts uneemess M1un l.n I signal,enter main lam. management systems." OBJECTIVES AGENDA • Learn about current and upcoming 7:30 a.m. Check In -Pre-registration required sewage spill regulatory requirements - Minimum man0ato y penalties 8:00 a.m. Opening Remarks - state water aoam sewage spill database Session 1 Regulatory Perspectives - cmom(capacity.Management,operanans 8:30 a.m. Mark Adelson, Regional Water quality Control Board, Surveillance/ and Maintenance) Enforcement Division - Notification requirements Larry Honeyboume, Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Karen Ashby, County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, • Learn about spill prevention through Watershed &Coastal Resources Division planning, design and construction of public works projects 10:15-10:30 a.m. Break • Review onsite spill response objectives Session 2 Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Perspectives in Prevention, and techniques 10:30 a.m. Response, and Notifications • Review the roles of spill responders Dave Ludwin, Engineering Department for local public works, fire and law Nick Arhontes, Collections Facilities Operations and Maintenance DMsion enforcement agencies, sanitary districts Deirdre Hunter, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division Adrienne Renescu, Source Control Division • Learn about the No. 1 cause of sewage spills-grease Noon-1:00 p.m. Lunch (provided) • Learn about the next generation of spill Session 3 Spill Response Case Studies notifications and use of technologi 1:00 P.M. Rob Hamers, Costa Mesa Sanitary District • Discuss interagency cooperation and 1:20 p.m. Regulatory Updates and OCSD Outreach Program spill response case studies Patrick McNelly, OCSD, Collections Facilities Operations and Maintenance Div. • Take part in a panel discussion- 1:40 p.m. Laguna Beach Fire Department's Role in Spill Response opportunities to get your Steve May, City of Laguna Beach questions answered! 2:00-2:30 p.m. Panel Discussion-p&A with presenters and closing remarks Pill • SHOULD ATTENDI Sewage Spill and First Responders: Sponsored by: Local City Public Works 1� It aw Fire Departments D mon mmm,nte rao n em•a: sewega sWnscan potamieny I/I Deirdre Hunter Law • - cease long-term demag•to the \I Orange County Sanitation District environment.anp prevent three (714) 593-7459 DistrictsSanitary dhunter@ocsd.com v August 21, 2000 Honorable Scott Wildman, Chairman Joint Legislative Audit Committee State Capitol, Room 3091 Sacramento, California 95814 RE: Special Districts Dear Assembly Member Wildman: I am writing on behalf of the Association of California Water Agencies to provide comments regarding your June 21, 2000, request to prepare a statewide audit of special districts. My apologies for not writing sooner. First and foremost, ACWA and its member agencies welcome your interest in the operations and oversight of special districts. Our association has been an active participant in California's legislative arena over the course of our 90-year history, working to ensure that special districts are accessible and accountable to their communities and their customers. Special district powers,duties and responsibilities—as with other political subdivisions of the state—are dictated by the California Legislature. California law requires independent annual financial audits to be conducted for all special districts(see, for example, Government Code Section 26909). California law dictates strict limits on the investment of surplus funds. California law requires independent special districts(those with 3,000 or more customers)to plan for future water supplies. California law requires independent special districts to coordinate infrastructure planning and development with cities and counties;to comply with federal and state safe drinking water and clean water acts,to have regular elections, and to have open meetings. California law spells out special district revenue raising authority. In fact, state law dictates every aspect of special district governance. The California State Auditor has prepared an analysis of your audit request. That analysis includes a"background" section that references a report published in May 2000 by the Little Hoover Commission on special districts. Your committee should understand that ACWA disputes the findings of that report. In fad,the Little Hoover Commission has backed away from their conclusion regarding retained earnings in their report. The Commission claims that"subsequent to the report's release, the Commission has become aware that some districts include some of their fixed assets in the values they report to the Controller as retained earnings. The Controller's office now believes that to accurately separate fixed r Honorable Scott Wildman August 21, 2000 Page 2 assets from other retained earnings would require a detailed case-by-case analysis." Commission staff, following release of the report, informed ACWA that the error regarding the use of retained earnings would be corrected and an acknowledgement of the error would be forthcoming. Instead, the Commission buried an obtuse footnote in the report, a portion of which is cited above. Commission staff was informed by ACWA and a number of its member agencies before the report's release that the retained earnings approach using State Controller data was fatally flawed. Unfortunately, Commission staff chose to proceed with drafting and releasing the report. ACWA was provided a copy of the report the morning of its release. We have been forced to react to its findings ever since. We would have preferred to work with the Commission to ensure that the report was fair and accurate. If ACWA was afforded an opportunity to work with the Commission instead of being forced to react to its report,this is what we would have shared with the Commission: Enterprise special districts report retained earnings in fund equity, which is the difference between assets(cash physical plant, land and investments) and liabilities(the amount owed on physical plant and land). This difference has no relationship to the cash position of the special district. The State Controller's annual report does not contain this information. Special districts as recently as the 1995-96 State Controller report forms, could not enter numbers in any column except"Enterprise Funds." Cities and counties, for example, are asked to break out their reserved, unreserved, and designated funds. Special districts with enterprise funds had only one place to account for any and all "retained earnings." The Commission should not have been surprised to learn after the release of its report that the State Controller's office definition of retained earnings did not include fixed assets. Retained earnings represent equity. The value of fixed assets is evident for each special district. There are different accounting standards for enterprise special districts versus other local governments. Enterprise districts "capitalize" their investments in plant and equipment as does private sector utilities. This means that when enterprise districts spend money on facilities, they do not treat these as expenditures, rather, they are looked at as investments. In recording this in on the balance sheet, it simply moves the recognition of a "cash" asset to a "capital" asset. The asset is then depreciated over the life of the asset. A new accounting regulation called GASB 34 will make general purposes local government to adopt this accounting practice, but currently they do not,they"expense" the asset when it is purchased. The relevance of this is that for enterprise special districts, "Fund Equity" (which includes "retained earnings" -the highlight of the Little Hoover Commission study) includes the value of all of the assets of the agency(by definition fund equity is equal to "Assets minus 'a Honorable Scott Wildman August 21, 2000 Page 3 Liabilities"). Since an enterprise special districts assets include facilities,their fund equity is inflated to represent the depreciated value of the facilities(water and sewer enterprise special districts are capital intensive). Since general-purpose governments do not include facilities in their balance sheets, their fund equity is deflated(essentially representing the difference between cash, accounts receivable, and investments less their debt and accounts payable). Please see the attached correspondence from East Bay Municipal Utility District to the Little Hoover Commission to further illustrate this point. • Each enterprise special district conducts an independent annual financial audit that generally includes a"management" letter. Each audit reports cash and other short-term investments and it is the sum of these numbers that will provide an accurate picture of"cash-on-hand." These audits are completed according to generally accepted accounting principles established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB). • The GASB and others, including the municipal bond rating agencies, provide guidelines for accumulating and using reserves. In addition, special district management works closely with the locally elected boards of directors to develop local policies regarding reserves, both generally and through the annual budget process. The locally elected boards of directors provide oversight of the investment practices of special districts; in addition, as noted above, state law strictly governs the investment of surplus funds. The latter was overhauled following the Orange County bankruptcy. • The presence and use of property tax revenue allocations varies by district. Since water and sewer infrastructure is required for property development, it is equitable that property owners participate in the financing, operations and maintenance of that infrastructure. Property tax revenues are also used for non-enterprise purposes like flood control and recreation. The State Auditor, in its analysis of your audit request, did not properly characterize the Little Hoover Commission. The latter states on Page 71 that"Property tax revenues have allowed many enterprise districts to charge less than neighboring districts charge for a like service. In addition to the inequities created,this policy distorts the true cost of providing services." The State Auditor completely misstates this point by writing that: `Property taxes subsidize the cost of providing services in some districts, which can exaggerate inequities among classes of ratepayers within a district." Nothing could be further from the truth. Property tax revenue, to the extent such revenue to is used to support an enterprise function, benefits all ratepayers equally by reducing the amount of revenue needed to pay for that enterprise function. The Little Hoover Commission also states on Page 70 of its report: "In the wake of Proposition 13, state policy-makers decided to distribute property tax revenue based on what districts historically collected,which prevented tax-dependent districts from having to Honorable Scott Wildman August 21, 2000 Page 4 drastically raise rates to cover expenses. The customers of those districts, however, were no longer paying higher rates, and so their service was effectively subsidized by taxpayers outside of those districts. And over time, the inequities have grown." The amount of property tax revenue allocated to each city, county and special district was reduced proportionately following the passage of Proposition 13. Therefore,the taxpayer receiving the service for which an ad valorem tax was imposed, still received the service, but fewer property tax dollars were dedicated to that service. A taxpayer not then paying an ad valorem tax for a particular service, was not required to pay the tax that supported the service. To do otherwise would be against both constitutional and statutory lawf The Commission statement that"taxpayers outside of those districts" are effectively subsidizing that service is reckless and inaccurate. There are too many problems in the Little Hoover Commission report to address here. Suffice it to say the Commission staff exhibited very little understanding of water and sewer district financing and operations. I would like to make one brief point, however. The rates charged for water, for example, by neighboring districts may vary due to the source of water(groundwater v. surface water),the age of the infrastructure,the level of debt service requirements, the rate of population growth and new connections, whether treatment is required (including the number and type of contaminants treated), whether pumping is required due to differences in elevation. To compare two districts using only water rates and whether property tax revenues are available is simplistic at best, and misleading at worst. The members of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee should understand that the audit scope and objectives proposed by the State Auditor are only going to be based on a sample of some 2,200 independent special districts. Since special districts, by their nature, vary from type of district; i.e., vector control, hospital, water, electricity, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to draw any valuable conclusions from the analysis. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ROBERT I REEB State Legislative Director RJR: cc: Mary P. Noble, State Auditor Richard Terzian, Chairman, Little Hoover Commission r NOTE: This is an electronically scanned copy Df the original document EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT DENNIS M.DIENER GENERAL MANAGER June 8, 2000 James P. Mayer,Executive Director Little Hoover Commission 925 L Street, Suite 805 Sacramento,CA 95814 Dear Mr.Mayer: On behalf of the East Bay Municipal Utility District(EBMUD), I am writing to clarify the misinterpretation of EBMUD's reserves balance as reported in the Little Hoover Commission's May 3, 2000 report,Special Districts:Relics of the Past or Resource for the Future? EBMUD believes that the Commission bas incorrectly used the terms"reserves"and"retained earnings" interchangeably.These two terms refer to entirely different concepts. In fact,"retained earnings"is an accounting term that describes the accumulated investment of not income,which has been reinvested into a utility's infrastructure.The Commission reported that with"retained earnings"of$597,332,000, EBMUD is among those enterprise districts with the largest"reserves"in the state.The Commission's report leaves readers with the impression that EBMUD has approximately$597.3 million in cash-on- baud,when in fact that is an inaccurate representation of EBMUD's reserve balance. The$597.3 million retained earnings figure that is used in the Commission's report does not represent any part of EBMUD's financial reserves. The$597.3 million figure represents over 75 years of cash contributions to EBMUD's infrastructure from revenues reinvested into its vast system(seven large water supply reservoirs, 92-mile aqueduct system, six drinking water treatment plants, 140 pumping plants and stations, 168 smaller neighborhood reservoirs,a wastewater treatment plant and four wet weather treatment facilities,29 miles of sewer collection interceptor pipeline,and 4,000 miles of drinking water distribution system pipeline).The investment of retained awnings into this extensive infrastructure system is important for ensuring that unplanned and unbudgeted infrastructure needs are addressed in a timely manner and to keep the costs of borrowing money low for our customers by relieving the need to incur debt for these ongoing improvements and rehabilitation activities that can be funded through reinvestment of net income into the system. EBMUD's projected financial reserves as of June 30, 2000 will be$64 million. EBMUD's Board of Directors has adopted policy principles which guide the level and use of the financial reserves to stabilize water and wastewater treatment service rates by offsetting unexpected fluctuations in revenues and unanticipated expenditures. In addition,EBMUD's financial reserves are used to fund our self-insurance and workers' I Q Mr.James P. Mayer June 8, 2000 Page 2 compensation liabilities,which represents a substantial savings from reduced third-party insurance administration costs for EBMUD customers. Additionally,EBMUD projects a capital reserve of $146 million as of June 30,2000.EBMUD plans to allocate funds from its capital reserve in accordance with the capital outlay priorities established by EBMtJD's elected Board of Directors within the context of its adopted capital budget,for projects inch as the Seismic Improvement Program,the Walnut Creek-San Ramon Valley Improvement Program,the South Interceptor Relocation Project,the Pump Station H Improvement Project,and the Water Treannent Upgrade Program,during Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002.As interest rates continue to rise,the use of capital reserves to fund the capital outlay program,rather than solely debt funding the program,will result in substantial savings to EBMUD customers in their water and wastewater treatment rates. Maintaining a prudent and reasonable level of reserves can have direct benefits for EBMUD's ratepayers. EBMUD received bond rating upgrades in recent years, in part due to the financial community's view that EBMUD'S reserve levels are appropriate based or the size of both the capital program and annual operating budget.These bond rating upgrades allowed EBMUD to secure lower interest rates on water and wastewater bonds in June 1998,saving EBMUD ratepayers approximately$5.5 million in debt service costs over the next 30 years. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify the misinterpretation of EBMUD's reserves in the Commission's report.We hope that the Commission can clarify its representation of EBMUD's reserve levels and can revisit the entirety of its analysis of "retained eamings/reserves."The Commission's incorrect reporting of special district reserve levels could inadvertently result in policy decisions that are based on an incomplete understanding of the differences between retained earnings and financial reserves and the multiple purposes and benefits of establishing prudent and reasonable financial reserves. Please feel free to contact Randele Kanouse, Special Assistant to the General Manager,at(916)443- 6948,if you have any further questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, DENNIS M.DIEMER General Manager DMD:RK:GF STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54964.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on / a3 , 20 OJwas duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 2000 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this V day of Pv " Penny M. I le, S161etary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HAWRI)TMADMINISSWORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC r MEMORANDUM DATE: August 16, 2000 TO: Board of Dire ors FROM: Lisa Law n, Communications Manager SUBJECT: Or e C unty Agencies in the News—Sewer Infrastructure Beginning on Wednesday, August 9,various agencies in Orange County, including OCSD were featured as part of an ongoing series of articles on the county's sewage infrastructure and issues affecting beach closures. The news stories appeared in the Orange County Register, Times Orange County Edition, Orange County News Channel (OCN) and KNX radio. The newspaper articles are attached. The following information is background material that may prove helpful when you receive questions from your colleagues or constituents. Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Prevention: • OCSD has identified 52 trouble spots and 91 siphons,which are considered high maintenance areas. The frequency of cleaning depends on the location, and varies from 5 weeks to 6 months. • Approximately 50 percent of the Collections Division is dedicated to preventative maintenance. • A brochure outlining how to reduce grease and oil discharges into the sewer was created by OCSD and distributed to the community. • Because we ask restaurants, industry and individuals not to dispose of household grease products in the sewers, OCSD offers a disposal location at Plant 1 for waste haulers in Orange County and watershed counties. Cooperative Projects Program: • The Cooperative Project Program is a voluntary program provided as a service to our member agencies. The program was established in 1999 to realize the district's strategic plan goal for inflow and infiltration reduction. The program is generally focused on reducing peak flows experienced by the district's treatment plants. Once a year, local agencies have an opportunity to apply for program funds. Funding includes grants and low interest loans for up to 50 percent of the total cost of projects that help reduce flows into the OCSD system. • A list of the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 Cooperative Projects is attached. 4 i I Spill Response: • After each spill OCSD researches corrective measures to prevent future spills or improve response. • We conduct extensive internal training, including quarterly spill issue meetings with the following departments: O&M Collection Facilities Maintenance,Environmental Compliance and Monitoring, Operations-Plant 1. • OCSD conducts extensive external outreach to the Orange County sewer agencies as a result of the OCSD city agency collection facilities survey. We communicate spill response information and coordinate other issues. The spill workshop scheduled for September 26 is an extension of our internal and external training and coordination efforts. This workshop is geared to industry professionals, managers, and directors. • A sewage spills reference guide was created by OCSD and distributed to member agencies. • During the next year,the County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department will be coordinating with OCSD staff when revising their internal spill procedures and documents. This is a good example of regional and watershed interagency coordination. • OCSD encourages cities and special districts to follow our lead in superior spill response. Our practice is to respond to a spill and contain it even if the line is not ours,taking responsibility for the down stream environment. Urban Runoff. • OCSD has provided funding for on-going studies and continues to participate in ongoing watershed protection issues and meetings. • Based on the emergency need to reopen the beaches, OCSD accepted urban runoff into our system. • We've developed one of the first dry-weather urban runoff acceptance policies in the state and are not charging agencies. OCSD COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM 2000 Applications Approved By The Board of Directors(a) Agency Project Descnphon(s) Disbursement Year Requested Dollars CityofCyphea Sewer Master Plan 01102 $37.500 City of Fountain Valley gl Study B CCTV 01102 $135,000 City of Garden Gme(GGSD) Sewer MP 01102 $132,828 City of Garden Grove(GGSD) DI Equipment 00/01 $46,790 City of Huntington Beach Sliplinirg 01/02 $950.200 City of Huntington Beach Sewer MP 01/02 $2D0,000 City of La Habra Sliplining,Sewer and Manhole Rehab/Replaca 01/02 $573,000 Midway City Sanitary District Manhole Rehab 01102 $375,000 City of Orange Stomrxater Improvements D0/01 $50,000 City of Orange Stormwater lmprovementa 01102 $315.000 Cityof Orange Sewer MP 01102 $55.000 Cityof Orange I/I Equipment 01/02 $35,000 Roasmoodi-os Alamitos Sanitation District Manhole Inspections 01102 $5,0D0 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Sanitation District CCTV 00101 $50,OD0 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Sanitation District Sewer MP 8 GIS 00/01 $57.500 City of Santa Ana Sewer MP 01102 $250.000 City of Santa Ana Sewer Replacement 01102 $151.000 City of Santa Ana CCTV 01102 $25.000 City of Santa Ana Stormwater Improvements 01102 $271,000 City of Seal Beach OW Towne Sewer Replacement Phase 2 00/01 $224,100 Sunset Beach Sanitary District Sliplining/Sewer Repalrs/SMP 00101 $83,500 City of Villa Park Sewer Master Plan Update 01102 $10,000 Totals $4.032.418 (a)Staff Is evaluating IRWD's application for$4.1 million this project will be resubmitted to the Board in November 2000. omml,gabaa Apmro w Applionlon 8ummary.xlslRpcommenEetl Lin OCSD COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM 1999 Applications Approved By The Board of Directors Agency Project Description(s) Disbursement Year Requested Dollars City of Santa Ana Manhole Rehab 00101 558,000 City of Santa Ana CCTV 00/01 $25.000 City of Newport Beach Sewer Repairs 00101 $56,100 Midway City Sanitation Disbict Sliplining 00101 $325,000 Midway City Sanitation District CCTV Equipment 99/00 $22,600 Sunset Beach Sanitation District Sliplining 99/00 $55,000 City or Buena Park Sewer Rehab 99100 $70,000 City of Placentia Manhole Rehab OO101 $7,500 City of Placentia CCTV 00101 $42,500 City of La Habra Sliplining 00/01 $369.664 City of Seel Beach Sliplining 00101 $126,900 City of Seal Beach GIS Mapping 00101 $16,710 City of Seal Beach Sewer Master Plan 00101 $25,000 City of Garden Grove Sewer Master Plan Owl $157,782 City of Huntington Beach Sliplining 00/01 $900.000 Totals $2.257,650 mrEMPosso App.vea AmicmIpn Summery.KlelAapnrved Lid Eateries clog sewers'arteries Page 1 of 5 ' g science stechnology Dme a B HtDORAt1O BANK ® , TOME PAGE TODAyly,yi�,e ARCHIVES S NEYVB ARCNNES BUSINESS UT & B 8 FINANCE science OCJOBFINDER CIASSIREDS COLUMNS Eateries clog sewers' arteries CRRIIME.COURTS&LAW EDUCATION ENTERTADIME ENVIRONMENT., Restaurants without grease FUN &GGAMESNT traps, homes and apartments share the blame for HEALTH&FITNESS LIBERTY ONLINE deluge of small spills, authorities say. LIVING&SHOWING POLmm& GOVERNMENT August 12,2000 REAL ESTATE SCIENCE& By BARBARA KINGSLEY, TECHOLOGY rHi.db. NATALYA SHULYAKOVSKAYA •Te W.Smile and PAT BRENNAN •EM&qu C I Edge Ol NMun The Orange County Register TJ&ar o�n umwN" s."vmw Grease from restaurants and densely populated apartment SF«m Faemros •T.d..]W&Ca udn& buildings clogs sewer lines and causes an avalanche of small SERVICES& sewage spills around Orange County-a problem that can PROMOT 0NS POTS pollute beaches and that most cities are doing little to stop. TRAVEL&RECREATION WEATHER Virtually all new restaurants in the county are required to install grease interceptors that catch and separate grease and are emptied periodically. However, cities dolt inspect them, according to a sewer district report, and many are reluctant to place new laws on existing establishments. When Newport Beach tried to force older restaurants to install the traps seven years ago, restaurateurs revolted and the City Council backed down. Cities are reluctant to make any laws that would deter restaurants from Coming into town, say some city officials. Several communities-- including Anaheim, Costa Mesa,La Habra, Orange, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Tustin and Laguna Beach--don't have grease discharge ordinances. "It's political," said Rob Hamers, manager/district engineer for Costa Mesa. "They say it's bad for business." http://www.ocregister.com/search/20000812/science/sewer00812cci.shtml 08/16/2000 Eateries clog sewers' arteries Page 2 of 5 Instead, Costa Mesa and other many cities let their building departments enforce rules through the issuing of permits. That can put standards in place for new and remodeled establishments but not existing ones. Even when grease traps are used they aren't always properly maintained, said Allen Stroh, a program manager for the Orange County Health Care Agency, which deals with restaurant grease. "A lot of the time people aren't aware of them," he said of the interceptors. "You have such tremendous turnover in the restaurant industry. People don't know about maintaining them or don't have them cleaned out regularly. When they clog up, of course, we have sewage spills." A survey released in June by the Orange County Sanitation District of 29 cities and sanitation districts in north, central and part of south Orange County during 1998-99 concluded that greases "are the major cause of sewer blockages and resultant sanitary-sewer overflows." The grease comes not only from restaurants and apartments but also private homes. "If you want to stop sewage spills, you have to stop the grease," Harriers said. "You can televise the sewer lines, you can cut roots, but you have to do something about the guy who is pouring grease down the drain by the gobs." Orange County has 12,000 miles of sewer lines. Most of them are smaller pipes, in greater danger of getting clogged by grease. In the past 4'/2 years, clogged pipes caused 670 sewer spills, more than half of all Orange County spills, an analysis of county records shows. Blockages didn't release nearly as much sewage as did pipe breaks or pump failures, but they shut down beaches and caused residents and officials major headaches. Such grease-caused clogs used to be rare -- at least, up until 1979, when Proposition 13 ended many sources of funding for public agencies in California. After that, sewer agencies and cities that previously cleaned sewer lines routinely for free began stopping those programs, Stroh said. Some restaurant owners who have experienced sewage spills on their properties think they were treated unfairly or http://www.ocregister.com/searcW20000812/science/sewerOO8 I 2cci.shtml 08/16/2000 Eateries clog sewers'arteries Page 3 of 5 improperly blamed for clogs that may not have been their fault. Adriano Maniaci, owner of the Sapori Italian restaurant in Tustin, said the city sent him a$1,000 bill Thursday for a May 26 spill. An estimated 500 gallons of raw sewage bubbled up through a manhole in the restaurant's parking lot near closing time. But Maniaci said he was outraged. He says no one ever proved the clog was caused by grease from his restaurant and not some other type of blockage, such as tree roots. "I think they are abusive," he said. "I'm not going to pay." Restaurateurs say they can't afford the traps that cost anywhere between $5,000 and $25,000. Some smaller establishments, like those in crowded Laguna Beach, haven't the space for them. Just 25 percent of the apprwdmately 50 restaurants in that city have grease traps. And grease traps and interceptors are not a magical answer to grease problems, said Gary Parkinson, president of the Orange County Chapter of the California Restaurant Association. Parkinson, who owns the Summit House Restaurant in Fullerton, said grease traps are smelly, unsanitary and fail to prevent all grease from entering sewer pipes. "You have that stink running all through the kitchen," he said. He also doubted that restaurant owners really had the political muscle to prevent city officials from passing grease ordinances, even if they wanted to. Most restaurant owners don't have the money or the will to fight such battles, he said. "We like the public to like us,"Parkinson said. "To think were being environmentally friendly and consumer friendly. To eat in our restaurants and be comfortable were not trashing up the environment." Garden Grove, the city where almost all spills are caused by clogged pipes, blames a lot of its sewer problems on densely populated ethnic communities and restaurants. The city sits on flat land, another reason waste moves slowly through the pipes, allowing grease to build. About 80 percent of maintenance time in Garden Grove is spent fighting grease deposits. http://www.ocregister.com/search/20000812/scienectsewerOO81 2cci.shtml 08/16/2000 Eateries clog sewers' arteries Page 4 of 5 "We have dozens of small restaurants, and many of them are ethnic," said Mark Leyes, a councilman who also sits on the board of the Orange County Sanitation District. "Some of them are run by immigrants who are not used to the same sewer issues." In the report by Orange County Sanitation, Midway City Sanitary District officials noted "more grease reported from areas with high ethnic diversity" contributing to 90 percent of their district's 27 trouble spots. Domingo Resendiz, who has worked for 28 years for a grease- collecting company called Baker Commodities, said he sees no correlation between ethnic foods and greater levels of grease. What is significant, he said, is the food used and how it is prepared. The Orange County Sanitation Districts a few years ago considered creating a restaurant-grease task force, in which several agencies would pool their resources to step up enforcement against restaurants. That idea was abandoned, however, in favor of methods the districts thought would be more effective: urging cities and restaurants, through brochures and education programs, to prevent grease from entering the sewers, spokeswoman Lisa Lawson said. The agency also requires cities to have grease ordinances in order to receive the 50 percent matching funds it offers for repair or replacement of sewer pipes. The Moulton-Niguel Water District sent each customer a message with the June bill: The brochure, called Fat-Free Sewers, asked customers to stop pouring grease into sinks and start collecting cooking grease into cans and put it into trash. The district, which runs 730 miles of sewer lines, covers Laguna Niguel, the western half of Mission Viejo and the southern part of Laguna Hills. "People used to stare and reuse the grease," said Larry Dees, operations director for the district. "Now we know that grease is bad for our arteries, so we pour it down the drain." http://www.ocregister.com/search/20000812/sciencc/sewer0O812cci.shtm] O9/16/2000 Countys sewage systems full of inequities Page I of �2 news `1Rnege __ ' M �t 0<r0y1f1N.Nm THE ORANGE cOUNTY REGism I NEIP '1 SEAM HOMEPAGE tot) stories TODAY'S NEWS +F Page :Ca No.. N.. County's sewage systems full of W.dd ARCHVES inequities BUS NES OMO&FINANCE OCJOBFINDER INFRASTRUCTURE: There is little regional cCOL MINSSS planning among the dozens of agencies, some of COMMUNITY NEWS which are nearing a crisis with aging pipes. CRIME.ON�SaLAw ENTERTAINMENT FUN A GAMES August 11,200D HEALTH a FITNESS LIBERTY ONLINE By TERI SFORZA and MARLA JO FISHER LIVING a SHOPPING POLITICS a The Orange County Register GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE SCIENCE a Some of the pipes channeling sewage beneath Orange County's TECHNOLOGY streets are made of clay,just like the ones in Rome 2,000 years PROMOTIONS ago.Others are molded from 21st-century plastic. SPORTS a RECREATION TRAVEL WEATHER Some are scrubbed, inspected and vigorously maintained by special districts flush in cash.Others are crumbling in the hands of cities with barely$100,000 set aside to replace them. There are a dizzying three dozen different agencies handling Orange County's sewage, and theirs is a tangled tale of haves and have-nots that has a profound effect not only on the public health,but also on the countys environment,tourist economy and continued growth.While everyone acknowledges that sewage is a vital public concern,there is little regional planning for what many expect to be a major infrastructure crisis over the next several decades,and a jealous guarding of funds between disparate districts whose pipes may overlap,but whose intentions and budgets do not. '"this is the nightmare of the 21 at century-not just for Orange County or California,but for the entire country," said Mark Petmcca,political-science professor at the University of California,Irvine. "We've neglected the infrastructure in this country since World War II, and the cost of replacing it is going to be so astronomical it'll dwarf the cost of the Cold War." Consider: • The Irvine Ranch Water District and the city<147,2,0>of Huntington Beach are roughly the same size,each handling sewage for more than 200,000 people. But Irvine Ranch http://www.ocregister.com/news/sewer00811cci4.shtml 08/11/2006 CounWs sewage systems full of inequities Page 2 of 4 spends about$8.5 million a year to maintain its sewers,while Huntington Beach spends less than$600,000. • The El Toro Water District and the city of Cypress are roughly the same size, each handling sewage for about 50,000 people. El Toro spends$2.9 million on maintenance,while Cypress spends$150,000. • Moulton Niguel Water District and the city of Garden Grove are roughly the same size, each handling sewage for about 170,000 people.But Moulton Niguel spends$7 million on maintenance,while Garden Grove spends$1.4 million. The situation is getting acute. Orange County's aging sewer systems spewed 57 million gallons of gunk into creeks,streets and lawns over the past four years,threatening public health and leading to at least 109 beach closures up and down the coast,a Register survey found. Figures from the Orange County Health Care Agency show that there were 1,108 sewer spills reported between 1996 and July 2000. About half of the 57 million gallons- 28.4 million- - was the worst kind of spill: raw sewage. That's enough human waste to fill 28.4 Olympic-size swimming pools. The biggest culprit in nearly all the raw-sewage spills was broken sewer pipes,part of a crumbling infrastructure beneath the streets. The next biggest culprits also were functions of aging or overtaxed systems: failing pumps and blocked sewer lines. "More people,more sewage,more problems," said Homer Bludau,Newport Beach city manager. "That'll require more money for expansion and upgrading the size of the lines.There should be a regional approach, ...but there isn't." CITIES AT DISADVANTAGE? The disparities between the haves and the have-nots inspire many sighs in older cities. "Special districts are in the business of dealing with sanitation issues exclusively,whereas that's not the only focus of a city," said John Reekstin, director of administrative services for Huntington Beach. "In a city there are a lot of competing issues, like police and fire protection." Many people don't even know special districts exist.They are holdovers from the county's rural days when there were no cities to provide services. But as the county grew up and urbanized,the districts did not go away.Many collect millions in property taxes in addition to the fees they charge for services. http://www.ocregister.com/news/sewer00811cci4.shtml 08/11/2000 County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 3 of 4 And many become very wealthy.The Moulton Niguel Water District was singled out in a state report for having tremendous reserves: It took in$56.7 million in 1996-97- and had$216.1 million in retained earnings. That makes it one of the richest special districts in California-and it was also one of the leading sewage spillers in Orange County. Also singled out for having huge amounts of money was the Irvine Ranch Water District($77.4 million in revenues and $279.6 million in retained earnings). "Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi- million dollar reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional or statewide infrastructure planning," said the Little Hoover Commission in a recent report. The state-ap<l 47,1,1>pointed panel studies how to improve local government. "These enormous public resources also are largely unknown and unexamined by the public or policy-makers." While the report blasts some districts for amassing so much money,and urges the Legislature to pass laws putting a cap on how much special districts can accumulate,the districts defend their financial practices as prudent. "We have a$2 billion investment in the ground. It's something we really have to maintain and protect," said Paul Jones, general manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District. The district owns a$33 million luxury apartment complex with three heated swimming pools and two lighted tennis courts in Anaheim Hills, as an investment. It's also a limited partner in another apartment complex in Aliso Viejo. Like Irvine Ranch, Moulton Niguel said it's putting money aside for the day its systems need to be replaced. "We have certain obligations, and what we're trying to do is match our reserves to our obligations," said Tom Hammatt,controller. "We have to put aside a certain amount of money for bond- rating agencies and repayment of debt." 'READY TO BLOW' When you're a city like Garden Grove,those sorts of arguments are hard to swallow. The city recently absorbed the Garden Grove Sanitary District,and all the problems that go along with it. Most of the system is "clay pipes,the same type they used in the days of Rome," said Garden Grove Councilman Bill Dalton. "Very old, 50 or 60 years old," said Councilman Mark Leyes. "They kept saying it would last until were all dead,and they were all 70 years old, so they were probably right. "We have seen some sewer breaks. We had one collector line http://www.ocregister.com/news/sewer0081Icci4.shtml 08/11/2006 County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 4 of 4 next to a storm drain that broke throe times since we took it over,and we had to go in and excavate it. ... Our fear is that we have other lines like that ready to blow,because of the lack of investment." Leyes' sense of fairness is tested when he looks at the books of the Orange County Sanitation District-the agency charged with treating and disposing of the waste that cities and other special districts generate. The Sanitation District has an operating budget of$60 million, and reserves of$374.5 million. "They argue they need that money because its the replacement value of their system," said Leyes,who is Garden Grove's representative on the Sanitation District board. "But how much is a prudent reserve? It should be somewhere between the half- billion dollars that the county has, and the zero dollars the city has." Keith Boillot was foreman of the 1981-82 Orange County grand jury, which hired Price Waterhouse to do an extensive study of special districts. Its report damned the duplication in the system and urged districts to merge and dissolve-by name. There have been some consolidations since then, but the system is essentially unchanged. "That's a major problem when you have so many agencies - the left hand never seems to know what the right hand is doing. It's time for another grand jury to take a look at these things."Register staff writers Pat Brennan,Natalya Shulyakovskaya and Barbara Kingsley contributed to this report. ki a9a'60aoer N omN cwu .calrc i. . _.. ... _. ca�rnpm z000 ma o�aase couay aealaror Please wM canmema to http://www.ocregister.com/news/sewer00811cci4.shtml 08/11/2006 Water quality's in the toilet Page I of community news Home age OOpWINi tim THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I HELP I SEARCH ' , service. HOME PAGE TODAYS NEWS ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS&FINANCE OWOBFINDER a CLASSIFIEDS Water quality's in the toilet COLUMNS COMMUNITY NEWS •Todays Stones ENVIRONMENT: Old sewer pipes and poor :c yR somas maintenance are keyfactors in O.C. spills. -Community Events P •Cnme.Coups&Law -Education August 10, 2000 .EI Toro FirewatOt -Growth •Obdwries By PAT BRENNAN, •Poldim IS Goin mment NATALYA SHULYAKOVSKAYA SEWAGE SPICCFINDlWUS •Register In Edu=ioe Religion and BARBARA KINGSLEY •Spedal Features The Orange County Register The Orange County Register CRIME.COURTS&LAW analyzed a database of EDUCATION Aging and poorly maintained 1,108 sewage spills reported N ENTERTAINMENT& A PD Y by agencies, businesses HEALTH&FITNESS sewer systems played a significant and residents to the Orange LIBERTY ONLINE role in the estimated 57million County Health Care Agency. LIVING&SHOPPING gallons of sewage that spilled in Despite of a law requiring POLITICS& Oran a Countyover the four reporting of all sewage GOVERNMENT g Past spills, some might go REAL ESTATE years,causing at least 109 beach undetected. The Register SCIENCE TECHNO IS OGY closures. according to county focused on spills reported SERVICES& records. between January 1996 and PROMOTIONS last month, the only period SPORTS&RECREATION There were 1,108 s Ills between for which electronic records WEATHER P were available. 1996 and last month, Orange County Health Care Agency Here are the main findings: records show,spreading noxious odors, closing beaches 30 times ,At least 67 million gallons of this year and prompting stepped- sewage spilled io Orange up fines against offending County since January 1996. agencies and enforcement by state Almost half of that—28.4 regulators. million gallons—was raw. Raw sewage is not treated were the in any way and represents While broken pipes the highest danger to public biggest culprits,equipment health. failure, construction damage, electrical outages, trapped globs -The spill database listed of grease and tree roots also are 127 spills that led to leading causes. immediate beach closures. ` At least 111 of them were "Every sewage spill is raw sewage. preventable," said John Robertus, Because of the way the executive officer of the San Diego records are maintained, not Regional Water Quality Control all the spills that lead to Board, which in recent weeks has beach closures were fined two Orange County agencies recorded in the database. http://www.mmgister.com/community/sewerG081001 cci2.shtml 08/10/2000 Water quality's in the toilet Page 2 of 3 for sewage ills. There were 134 beach g closures in the county since January 1996. The county "If I was going to build a system keeps a separate list of now,I would overbuild it," beach closures. Robertus said. "If we don't,we just throw this stuff into the • Broken sewer pipes led to ocean." the most sewage spilled. They spilled at least 24.7 million of 28.4 million gallons The Register analysis, which of raw sewage. Other covered spill records from January leading causes are pump- 1996 to last month,showed that station failures, blocked some agencies overseeing sewer pipes and storm water g g 0ootling the sewage systems seem to have more systems, causing spills. trouble than others. Garden Grove was among the 10 natalya@notes.freedom.com agencies that spilled the most raw, untreated sewage,which -Call: (714)796-7024 represents the most significant health threat. The city's pipes are 50 to 60 years old,city officials said,but the city lacks the funds to upgrade and replace them. So the pipes continue cracking while the city continues to grow. One line near a storm drain has broken three times in recent years and bad to be dug up and repaired. "Our fear is that we have other lines like that ready to blow because of the lack of investment," said Garden Grove Councilman Mark Leyes,who is also on the Orange County Sanitation District Board. The Moulton Niguel Water District,which serves Laguna Niguel, Aliso Viejo and parts of other south county cities,also reported one of the highest numbers of spills. On Wednesday, a San Diego regional board staff member announced a fine of $83,000 against the district for eight sewage spills since January 1999 that reached the ocean, fouling beaches. But the district's operations director, Larry Dees, said his agency's pipes are in fairly good shape. If the sheer number of them - 730 miles worth- is taken into account,his agency's record is no worse, and possibly better,than other large agencies, he said. "Some of the systems have less than 100 miles(of pipe)to maintain," Dees said. In that case, "it's easy to have only one or two spills per year." The San Diego regional board staff also assessed a$60,000 fine against Laguna Beach for eight spills since January 1999. The agency responsible for the biggest spill on Orange County httpJ/www.ocregister.com/community/sewe10081001cci2.shtml 08/10/2000 Water quality's in the toilet Page 3 of 3 beaches was not even in Orange County. ' During El Nino nuns in 1998,a pipe leak in San Bernardino County went undetected for nine days,resulting in more than 2lmillion gallons of raw sewage that found its way down the Santa Ana River to the coast. "It was a harrowing experience," said Paul Dolter,engineer for the East Valley Water District in San Bernardino. "Just a combination of things from nature." Officials in the cities and districts that oversee sewer systems say they are working to fix damaged pipes and improve inspection and maintenance. But a 1998-99 survey of 29 cities and sanitation districts in northern and central Orange County found uneven funding and maintenance of sewer systems. Many districts think their sewer systems were underfunded. Many have no dedicated sewer fee and must rely on general funds to pay for basic operations and maintenance. The report, by the Orange County Sanitation District,also found that several cities and agencies "are still uncertain about the correct priorities for responding to a sewage spill." The report also said that, while many agencies have "excellent"overall maintenance programs, "some are barely able to keep up with cleaning trouble spots."The report noted that many have yet to complete a TV analysis of their sewers and that"few have done a complete infrastructure analysis." These programs are required under new Environmental Protection Agency regulations for sewer-capacity management. Wayne Baglin,chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, said about 20 percent of beach pollution is due to sewage spills and the rest to urban runoff. "I look at that 20 percent from sewers and say this is preventable," Baglin said. "This can be eliminated because these are mechanical and operational problems." Register staff writers Marla In Fisher and Teri Sforza contributed to this report. Copyri WMMM5re Ore County R Pl egister ease send comments le atteosler@Iink.heMom_com http://www.ocregister.com/community/sewer0081001 cci2.shtml 08/10/2000 LA Times Page I of 3 �. $$$ Tired of credit card debt? F01.04( 10 Home I Archives I print Edition I Home Delivery I Advertise I Site Nap I Feedback I Help New; Business Soorts http://s .tatimes.com/editions/orange/20000SIO/t000074984.htmt politics Travel Commentary Ernertatnrnent Classf leds Sh000fna ipggi m.A.•a� L.hoer. Back to story M reetaurants can,rentals Thursday, August 10, 2000 Lawmaker Seeks Funds for Sewers ■ Assemblywoman Patricia Bates says she'll try to get state property tax money to cope with the health threat. By MEG JAMES,Times Staff Willer Orange County's deteriorating sewer system is "the tip of an iceberg, and below it you've got this big bubble waiting to explode--with all of this human sewage," a state legislator said Wednesday. Assembly member Patricia Bates(IL-Laguna Niguel) said aging and poorly maintained sewer pipes are a "significant health threat," and she vowed to prod the Legislature to return more property tax money to cities to repair sewer systems. Other state and federal officials also decried the situation and called for action. "This is absolutely critical," said Bates, a former Laguna Niguel City Council member who serves on the Assembly Select Committee on Coastal Protection. "This is about cities looking at long-term and short-term needs, and the state does play a role in that." Sewer lines in Orange County have broken down at least 198 times so far this year, spilling more than 300,000 gallons of raw sewage, a review by The Times found. Much of the bacteria-laden waste is channeled into storm drains and creeks, and eventually flows into the Pacific Ocean. All of the 30 beach closures so far this year--eight more than last year--have been caused by raw sewage spills. Experts say a bigger culprit in Southern Califomia's chronic coastal pollution is urban runoff, but experts admit they don't know how much raw sewage contributes to the problem. State and federal officials say they are becoming less tolerant of sewage spills. On Wednesday, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board released a complaint it filed against the Moulton Niguel Water District because the district was responsible for eight sewer spills--which released 39,000 gallons of raw sewage that tainted the ocean--during the first six months of this year. The regional board recommended that Moulton Niguel be fined $83,360 for the spills. The board set a hearing for Sept. 13,two weeks after a similar hearing for Laguna Beach, which is responsible for eight spills in 18 months that closed beaches for 29 days. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/pfnt.cgi 08/10/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 3 The Moulton Niguel Water District has not determined whether it will contest the regional board's proposed fine, said Larry Dees, director of operations for the district, which is spending$1.3 million to upgrade five pump stations. "Every time we find a problem in our system,we fix it right away,"Dees said. But Chad Nelsen, environmental director for the Surfrider Foundation, said cities and water agencies should be doing more up front to prevent problems. "This is just another case of the cities being totally reactive,"Nelsen said. "It's a too-little, too-late kind of a thing, and it's really a shame." The county's sewer problems have been brought on by years of neglect, said U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher(R-Huntington Beach). Rohrabacher, a surfer, said he has witnessed the waters off Orange County become more and more polluted. "It's clear there are some major problems with urban sewer systems in Orange County, and particularly in Huntington Beach," Rohrabacher said. "The City Council members have been hoping that this problem wouldn't explode on them while they're in office. For 20 years, city officials have been pushing it off for tomorrow. . . . Sewer pipes have been neglected, and now it's a threat to the public safety." Much of Huntington Beach's coastline was closed for weeks last summer because of high bacteria counts. While the source of Huntington Beach's pollution has not been identified, city officials have blamed urban runoff, the toxic brew that drains from inland dairies, lawns, streets and parking lots and flows through storm drains to the ocean. A committee that spent two years studying the aging sewers, streets and storm drain system in Huntington Beach identified more than$88 million in needed repairs. Huntington Beach Councilwoman Shirley S. Dettloff defended the public works program, saying the city spent $2 million to find the source of last year's beach pollution and has reinforced the downtown area's sewer lines, some of which date back to the 1920s. "We want to find the source of any pollution going out to the ocean," Dettloff said. The Orange County Sanitation District is also spending $4 million this year for matching grants for cities in need of sewer repairs. The program is providing money for 25 projects, including Huntington Beach, district spokeswoman Lisa Lawson said. Rohrabacher said it is up to local governments to fix their sewer systems. Still, he said, he plans to introduce legislation in Congress next month to establish a "coastal trust" that would collect revenue from offshore oil interests. That money would be used to pay for coastal water quality studies, artificial reef projects and measures to counteract coastal erosion. His measure would also seek to use NASA satellites to map the flow of pollution near beaches. "We've reached a threshold where we can't just try one approach," Rohrabacher said. Copyright 2000 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/cgi-biri/print.cgi 08/10/2000 Y i• � Y i � . �o� ,Angeleo c�ime� 1 IX[IHRNIEI:wvrnnrrumra wE°NiSMY,AVGISr9,rm0 aUtY rL xe¢uroln.gmwiw•imuwxar mnio.wsmrmurvs°nuo .. a.. vrews,vawnr� T ��[Ye�a�e eyjusEve have Is in deep trouble— Efforts to apply a regional cure Laguna Beach approved i sewer- they Chu lust haven't faced mit ember said for neglected and aging fragmented system- tare rate hike in July to pay for inspect- Chuck Schthat a member d study-rom- Twopregi by a lards an d system. i m all hof eire lines wllh i videoam- ing th tart spent two years . Two regional with di and 341ocal era. The rep through onrrolled ram. Pipes a Major sng the and st and.drams of Hun- agencies—all and mPil main- eras creep through pipes. sewers and storm drains of Hun- penance nt budi and crew sew. broadcasting pictures of the in. taAftegton Beach. provemenlbWg Orange ousew- tenor,and arena considered an the best ° After much of Hast summer age collection vI Orange Cooly,a way to find tiny cracks and buildup Factor m O.0 coastline case deed last summer patchwork of clay, concrete and of cogs.When Huntington because of high ocean bacteria plastic popes so extensive,Mine that, d used tamers di ins rt its aging courts,re mineice term m on de. laid out in a straight line,would ban runoff,the toxic brew of rani- g lines,workers that had n enen Coastal _" stretoM1 from Seal Beach to C eeo- of sews Pipe Nat had been ea en W road waste.tat drain and streets,her ped- antlaMback again. away. IUtants that drain from street; ^Sewers(myeanhaveaid out. But in most cities,sewers take lawns and parkigg lots.The polio- of-sight, outrot-mind" said Nick low priority. carts dream into rearm drains and Arhonres, manager of facilities "I don't think anyone has con- - ■ Environment:Officials waterways,eventually tainting the maintenance for the Orange 8 dusted those inspections as the have focused On Nn01r,but °�°' eq. County Sanitation District-People past." as they should have in the lirgelyas been the raw in mine hole,down the anger[and sees age and neglect of waste tier has been the raw human wane hole;they gel an and call Cpiolt past;' said Wayne Baglin.rhair sli in into We waters from bro- Y man of the San Diego Regional lines are linked to a1130 g Hall to see somay not done stoat Water Quality Board which en- ken, seeping or stopped-up creek pipes it. it s they may not know that fortes the Clean Water Act in o beach CIOSUfeS this}'safe via storm drains or creeks that their sewer system is more dis- southern Orange and San Diego Maintenance would have empty into the ocean. tressed than their atteete counties. 'If they videotaped the But dad compiled by The Times Records show a dear link be- lures,tbey d probably see things so Prevented many problems. show that problem pipes, even tween spills and neglect. urgent they wouldn't understand those 2a miles or more from the Most 11]S how it's holding together.even to- Ry SEEMAMEHTA f9ease see3EwAGE,AIY P din." and MEGJAMES au. sw®.m....wr.a Were Avoidable II. fTAfr gffa6 The waters off Laguna Beach Hidden,Chronic Poorly maintained and aging SEWAGE:Aging, have been sallied by during the gallons Inver systems in Orange Cooney i _,a T. d human wrote Curing the Wst 18 Leaks Suspected have clogged mumbled or broken Ignored Waste Pipes months. In sewer-line spill last Town at least 198 times coo far Nis tingly,barefoot rough p m ides of Dn infinitive er expects cts suspect year, spilling more than 300.000 Threaten Beaches tingly . which through puddles of that n and other experts suspect ga Muchf my sewage. sewage. which city workers ear thatsomecrthe chronic cOrange Much of this bacteria-laden Goo !aged to coNan off,on astreet near nation at spots along Orange waste eventually finds its way to occurarau from Al the beach. County s shoreline may be exarer ocean,caused all d the 30 beach the Pacific Oman, adding to the In Seal aeazh,three of the leer bated by sewage dripping mpm. :ounty's miserable year of coastal closures this year in Orange beach closures this yell have been tmtotl from tacked and compro- pollulum. County—eight more than in all of used by inland sewer pipe block- mind lines. Because d a lack of The data on sewage spills were 19". - ages and breaks.In June,a blacked inspections. no one really knows The number of sewerpipe spills compiled by The Times based on is on a pace to exceed last year's pipe overnowed 15 miles away in how many lines are damaged—and hundreds of pages of documents, la Habra.sending 50.090 gallons of how long some have been leaking. neluding surveys sent to 34 agen- numbers,with five months left to selvage into the San Gabriel Rover. 'There's a strong suspicion that ciee and cases about maintenance. go, In 1999, 264 spills in Orange which empties into the mean just acme d the high counts of bacteria ;uniting and future needs, The County released 318,303 gallons of earth d Seal Beach. in storm water are the result of limes also collected sewage spill raw waste.These numbers were up And in Dam Point,a 1933 pipe sewage breaks,undetected cmro- sightly from the year before. m reforation from the county and with hairline cracks ruptured in slog mi;' aid David Beckma .sm mue It's impossible to know exactly May.creating a hole the sire of four attorney for the Natural Resources While some of the spillage was how much of the spilled sewage hits Orange County's beaches from cad.The force of the break shot Defense Council in Los Angeles. caused by an aging sewer system 8,000 gallons of raw sewage into Carden Grove Sanitation Decided pipeline breakdowns each year. :hat would he expensive to replace. Nor is it clear whether the eouitya the greet,closing halts tide of had the mast spills crony agency in most of it stems from easily pre- problems are worse than elsewhere beach. The city says the cracks 1999—d atly one out of every five irritable problems:pipes choked in Southern California.San Diego contributed to the rupture. reported in Orange County, ac- County's Oman pollution problems Mon of there spills could have— counting for more than one-third of is THE ROMBEBS frequently originate in the more and should have—been avoided by the raw sewage released.Most of A detailed breakdown of spills, polluted Mexican waters adjacent routine inspections and proper the citys 45 spills were caused by maintenance costa and other to it La Angeles County reports a maintenance.aperts my.The Ira- buildup Ira- of from restaurents sewage system data.A= minuscule number of sewage spills guns Beach spill in July occurred and homes. at reach the coastline.but some days after city workers ignored a ty grease or pits roots.or sewer that doubt whether those gum- resident's complaint about a Ines that simply go unmainmined. tea relied reality. backed-up sewer, which might have been leaking undetected for five months. R14R WE.DNESDAY, AUGUSf9,2000 The city three years a Inherited in ee ede three years ago from ve independent district Gallen Grove Inu 1 y has no maps showing where its 425 r miles of lines are bused,Its$Chad- ule calla for cleaning medium-sized pipes only once every seven years; . recommendations call far annual 1 l clan-outs.large pipes have never s been cleaned. And 5 NO feet of plastic sewer main from the 196ew 1 �\ �) y "� r f are now falling apart. "When we Look over the goals. lion distnft an,it was a diser;'Gar- r t,(y v ' ' F i ,N`$w5 121-- den Grove Mayor Bruce Broadwa- ( Lee said. "We had pipes that literally have an older cyst "We have an older maintained, d, It ti I ,,1 hint really been but It t Ia la . g,� fy v ,t,� will be maintained,but rt's a long' nta luaa6 term program;'Broadenter mid. Victor Hermelin feels the tension on a cable used td clean out debris In a Huntington Beach pipe' The City Council plans to spend incl$1.4uding million ani year an its syste ' SEWAGE: Ailing Systems Under Scrutiny including cleating Its entire system once every hva end, years. Yet In the end, experts say, It probably costa leas p de proper a Continued q from At date dilapidated lyalems—about parted For funexample, of San maintenance and repair than to o water quality engineer working the billion annually,tanaccordingSewerage e cu example,San Clemente his wait until human waste spills out or on the have to newer spill bare ors. ilia Aran,of But in Orange Coon ge tlocues.each all Its spline rinre each, backs co from pipes. 'You have to pull the Inc tan out Agencies. But In Orange County, OUwn,ran as raw. son Beach, "It costs a lot to be y the rear- m the s meat of the night and pay cancers over beach pollution Ion Habra and Orange.still report live mode;"said a SEW Gonzales,At worker overtime.If you put maim makes its failing rawer system an few rpllle,d any. penance an i five-year t em is pr by acute,If y agencies have ,issue. Please see SEWAGE,A74 "Anybody who aye they have a planning things out,Nerc Id prob. County agencies have identified able avia.a' nearly e2 billion in needed sewer perfect maintenance system with To be were.Nmineew oilier invest in upgrades in coming yarn, That ideally sera releases or blopact,' k. Neir fewer,Newport Basch has adoesrts not include the nestle of IY ages—n would da very a Tucson aped are than 16.5 million five anodes that didme not provide eni- said Jon hers. filer, a Tenon sewer projects The during she last live maream The Tlmee. sewage expert. years. The city has built a new mid Assemblywoman been lywoma Harjush-Beth But the dUee defend their re- pump sewerigra.T replaced cityelmiterke, laid..(D- eats B,Hamuh-ger- po"The mill sewer manna.The city clean- dackarn l the As a bay M L CWtr- "The ones that I can recall ve of sewer mama every a mantra, woman of the Assembly hired fom- know we've respondedRich and we've and trouble spots are scoured mines an cU Protection."We reportedHuntington Lhasa;'end sp kesnaan. manaly.ws in awa9e9.she clay reposed ea Just m. anapeeWgouna home He added Beach fpakeshae two al o vewage spins that released ..at. . and er coming r home to no a idde frothy officials have a total each so rooaL . . .Everything runs dawn- not hidden from the face about Newport Bach earss ago. loon- lull.it all mru Into she ocean." their sewer to the brought aled range plan lour years ago. Poor attention to Ne aging,deseelon4d other OrangetoCounty a plan cities are more stringent federal require- lflXrUffiVen lines In downtown Huntington more stringent by then require- Beach before spending more than manta proposed by the envlaan- Reporting of Spills $2 million to reinforce them over mental Proquilem Agency. the Imp year and a halt. Trove tiny of are part of a LagunaRegional water officials month hIill.Be thiBeach ammeq the Huntinrefused - new suite water tilling newer ey.- fnu Reach Sg0,000 het month ton Beach Clti Ctoa sk relaxed n havehonss ent thel t year englnttra for its eight splllr in the tan or recommendation to ask waters In have agent the 1,n year buildings mostly,which closed beaches for November for money et Improve database m tto g all meopangle n the Di days. expected to the of Water co dty'e aging sewer system. is Ceem.Cotogetaso Is cost the day isexpectediterliedto councilrumember aidthe blpublic problem.Congress rim Is r quality yea far a aging a nst the toe didn't understand ewer h ablema mg several pieces of Pelee quality year. A (lee against tee Orange well enough t pass such a agreed legto cueing an.And swage EPA is new lo- County next month. OlwtrkL is ex- aloe,although they have reon the an sewage spills as one of peeled neat mm�N, pal an advlvory meagre on the No- three high-priority Clint n es.on "You countywould exped[eels the tit- vembctioneat. President t enl Clinton on Monday ins e,county begin to sal vnth the p canmilsee evaluating to towers Burning- Signed she Oceans Alt er C white iswue;'he most said.pan. ton Beach's streets atl sewers iden- ennanOealPmemberCommtr- Far the requirements I. hified se ern,pars.ien worth of sirseg es to Palley to coordinate coastal oa me been lax, drecord-keeping inn needed sewer akem and replace. crdiogira to better palace lied on been lax, and rlast couple fig manta. ply ee. pump report stations in mvlromoonlf.nd Me and,lso 1l called on spotty, until the lees couple of emanating from pump inn swung in Congress to fund cl es a p Legacy years, making any comparison n of need of ra.One in sloths $429 million in local joss proposed spillssthe late 19gmea^inglaa. aaPa pumping ma milli on indecalyear. for In the late19'tO o post rabbit- '^pare°War Ieonlifesupport man could id nationwide kept some pa reports on grist rabbit-to "It's old and tired."aid Some. Cerlam tainly,counawhon000 prob- as*bunny notes.kingly referred to the roringseememben "Some- ..teryeeoumry'atreatmmsle as*bunny that rep bmedudngamaAootlt...wiea. water ryrrems of wchtreotea day. ills fell that reported all of theirit might break,antldn flood.wit hin billion staggering price tag ad ay, spine fah they were agencies I e[aciesweocal.' flooding Ule lace a amggering price tag to up- branded hecause other agenda re tool nctRhborewd." c a r � j sty j r ea •vx w �`t ;z. .� - t� t � 1 vi Nt ji, iNOM1MENOMEl13 1No. 2 3� 4B"MoMon" (1 II ME SEWRGE 4 imAes Win Bonn123a 24.IN Orange County's Sewer System TRFABMFMS pUrM 4anew, MoM MMe. Mo 4sit,fen notes 0. AamM. T TT ■//�,6 AWA�V b ep dreg V Hundreds of millions of gallons of sewage now under Orange County every day through an aging and often monnoroolm^ neglected network of pipes.last year in Orange County, - clogged and crumbling sewer pipes spilled more than 300,000 gallons of raw sewage. .� L4aaMent pinnlr ORANGE COUNTY CRIES AND AGENCIES OVERSEEING SEWER LINES R6}OM tlly/A(an y/pbMss Popu41W Oa89 BM. Ban onin Oldnal Mnuvl R-I Meow, Sewn &aaN Sewp OoOnl fnn8e 5qM Bi No. MJnlersrce Ngnananb InMnnnwb inn b Wol 119991 S}snrs MtlMb 6Nw Bon MIN Boon Mow ohmilry/ 4W,W0 40 motet 0 0 N. 1966-91 SM S30900 NNAvailaEk NA rrvM., Nn ADtol M lin IR".0nona4mlyN, oM20XBrs Mantim Mitm Xm AwilaMe St. li 5,150 195489 1950s MiAmlaSk Not Awill $400BA09B.Bn2005 S94/moot Bm 36,OW A8 MOW n] 0 Wi 192975 1929 SM.." S1N.Min 1991 Undit Omiopmenl 51652.N/mmN Winston, 35.900 Nw AeileMe 2W 3 8,300 195 19M $265,0M 6150,000in 1986 $350.000 annuNlY SI/mwrA foab Mw Sanury0isrnd SKIS. 12dmiNon 32. 14 SING MMd95N INS S500,000 Xm Awl" SlBmillmnannualy 52302/par cyp- 46,000 Nd Aniloble 87 0 &ne 1961-09 1956 $150,000 None UndolDmloomenl $.11/I1Owtlo Ml 51km NibrpMrl 50.800 4.5 millon 142 3 4,650 1965B5 190 $2.9 notion $16,5 n1d'nn on.19M NNA..bl. WAwiMXle 5.lhd 81 5e nf.. 1.600 It'= 6 0 Nene 1930W 19M 1135.M Still Mom 1985 None Mono feu novio, - 55,No PoIAwi4M, 130 1 I,WO Ill 19505 S2Po,W0 Hone Under OeelppmeM Noon WEedan 121.030 NMAinktAe 2M 15 9,M 1950.59 1910 $M.M S652.200 Mo.1.5 onto 54.13/mmN GaWn Gme Sanigry ONdn 170,W0 IOmiono 425 45 112,365 1952b1 19D $1.4 mine 12.1 Won Mina 199E $10.1 millet ii 20CB $3.32/mmM Ill Beaty 2O3W0 NoMi iMAk 600 1 On.. I9Wb9 IBM 5520,M0 $9.4 No.No.1990 i9B million wer20Kers Nan, Mne RnabViabr Olwirl M. W 195 MIR. 5W 3 6% 191089 IBM $14.6 Winin $05.3 milim size 1928 S Bollonbr20pars $550/mdmh IaSvna a'.. n,2W 2.1 mAfon 90 15 25,13D 191565 1945 5610,310 19.5 mTnn 1.INS 512.2m10on-10,olars $311/Ka to In. 55.805 NNAwil 127 0 No. 1925 1925 S126,836 1670,0013 M 1999 S2.5mi11m MM02001 10%Nwabr Ml WAAus„bnr OONrr I3.. 4.3.0m 106 0 Nme 19109n IBM MN.= $250,11110 gin 3930 Non NWAKRtlk Mno;ry into 5anibdon(loin al WAw 160, 1 SIM 1950 IM It Who. 190".W0 S3WmiMonwn30Xx $13/Xar Moullen Nldel Wier pMtrcl IW.WO 151m1Mm 730 B 12,750 Mt l9ft 19M $7.2 Win, SITE Wion vna INS S25i5 milAon lAmu6A 206 X.A.MON Nea'om Beaty 22,0W 10.0on 210 2 825 19l 19B S1.6mlim US Milian-IS" S145miMM-2111. N3 $5.25/alonN Moo, 122,61)0 Nm Anol 305 0 None JN6 I9 1910 1325,M 05 Whon vote 1930 Klmill'wnwn20pars SA2/monto Owt,Counry 22 million 243Bom 650 Il 15,541 1950.69 19M $5,3 Who S22 miIGmM 1998.0 S1,I8 Won ner lO Kan 534/par i nanwon... Floi,tbo 35,0110 Mtkiniame 25 2 3,I0 1910-W IBM 110).(10 SIW,OW in 1995 UMnpMOOmem Non I Nonmwr/Io"Moon M Monnooage Nq M9air SI 0 Xone 1952% 1952 S20.0]0 59W.WOin 199E Won Woe 1 Alen Senor D'¢Nn San Oememe 49250 46 millon 170 2 11100 9m1920 1929 $1.4 nol $49.6 olok.slme 197E SEA W hoo Month 2005 NolAwiNde San inn Capbtram 32.1130 3.25 motion 95 0 Wm 1966 19M $532,000 $3.1 moon 19B mI6m On.&2W1 SISW/molt Santa Am 315,W0 36.5 Won 45) 8 11.055 195049 192M $665,855 010,M in 1995 $2.9 miXbn thool 2020 None Somamon,niMMole,OiNAn 101.000 IO miulon 452 5 9.350 Sze 1986 1970 $15 mien 0.2 wIYon Mn,o 1993 S13 notion.,5pars WIAwUaS: SW Bntlo NMMdht4e lNoWlaoe 45 - 0 In. XNAwXaSk N/A NW,IXq $1.2 MAonv INS $325,000M2WU01 2nol.FbI Stacontoont D5Ntl 40WO 3.6 nlllbn 139 15 10,025 AMPS 194M $910,OW 310.1.Mnx1972 $5.6 millon MinyA 20M NBABlade SMnron W.5C0 HnA.Mnk 55 1 6W 1945.59 194N 1146320 NNAniM61e n80.00()1or2W001 $2825/pa SumelBne'ASon.Miyl). 3,500 Upb3WpW 85 0 None 1936 1936 Motion a N15,120 slhn 1995 S4W,WOore"o on, $1438/mmt Mourn CarOm..nD. WAN 200.OW 45 0 Wu 198292 19H $54,001) N. NMAnion. S19.00/must %M&.Mot Nookno'G NNAniMEle 22 0 Won Al 19205 $120,0N None None WIAl no.Unypw PSMCI 65.M N.AviMMe 13B 2 SIN 19E090 I9 f2W.OW 1150.ODJ in 199911)(0 S95500i1 20MI In-. HISTORY OF SEWER PIPES IN ORANGE COUNTY 1940s and Before 1950s and 60s 1970s Present day blorionliklin- 1me5romotf aNMaor9 WenwmlBelpMio nNne 4. mLI,E,.Ne,iMO vp§pn n)wM nind eseinnrtn 1 HM M 2» MNedN 0-fhIilnU"LI0 5FFl B pCen ntwppp¢ MIitINeM.1nXMlMb:lm mW a,p deip¢MrM, J, Iv - a,p�onhM. dN a ¢ Wo.t.l.:tooinikuAhm �4 3 o,.MdWBW, UMW and 6 \ .M.,W Nal.n. � �4e -Moni boato-on Ninenon'.. R, Wo. Onm du8M0a BeB.B.re6NiaM.� yMMNMx onaM OmugnaM itMIe IM ii511e 1g2r@pnM � Mnm6Wn1. same etc.Snuu..wnr.aapare�enwbve.rcervHaeeaeauma.Vw eamry xa xawrWgyy,i:p,pWe{ercnamuea,OamranraB4W OMw WtWMW.m ANMaiunn RKUI PYF.1/w.nwtln imn ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT August 16, 2000 phone: I7141962-2411 To the Chair and Members mailing address: of the Board of Directors P.O. Scz B12T F ntaln valley,CA Subject: Board Letter 92T28-812T street addrnr. 10844e1V Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 1,44 El valley, um 9 Y Y 9• 92708-701e information on any of the items, please call me. OCSD Certificates of Participation Rated 'AMemer A Agencies During the past several months, staff and the FAHR Committee have been working to • restructure and reissue the District's existing long-term borrowing or Certificates of Cities Participation (COPS). The goal was to modernize the language and covenants to reflect the consolidation of the District and to reduce overall costs. The Board Anaheim approved this refinancing, including a small reimbursement portion, at the July arse Buena Perk meeting. As a part of this process, staff invited all three rating agencies to visit the cYPreaa plant and participate in discussions about our Strategic Plan, mission and vision, Fbantain Valley Fullerton management team and the Orange County economy. Goldoni Grove Ha,dington swath wine Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch have all released their official ratings. Their to Habra unanimous opinion is that the District deserves a strong "AA-category" rating. This La Palma Lt.Alamitos rating categoryis the highest assigned to revenue-type borrowing, such as COPS, Nauyort eaatn without insurance. The higher AAA-category ratings are generally reserved for Grange borrowing that is secured by real property, like general obligation bonds. The rating Placentae Sense Ana agencies cited "strong financial performance with very strong reserve levels", "the seal Beath District's large but manageable capital plan"and a "strong, diversified customer rem" base" as considerations that warrant this hi h ratin The a encies also noted the reran 9 9• 9 Villa Perk value of the current NPDES permit and our ability to plan for it's renewal. Yor,o Linda County of orange Having a stand-alone AA rating will provide cost savings to the District. Previous COP issues were rated on the basis of purchased insurance. This insurance will not Benitery Districts need to be purchased in the future, thereby reducing costs. Because institutional investors' portfolios are limited to certain percentages by insurer or issuer,we also caste Made expect increased competition to purchase these new OCSD COPS and a resultant MMway cty reduction in interest rates. The present value of the anticipated savings from the Water Districts refinancing exceeds $1.4 million. o-rma pinch Already there has been some reaction to the new ratings. The Bond Buyer, a financial industry newspaper, published an article titled "Orange County Sanitation Deal Smells Like a Rose" in their August 8, 2000 edition.The Bond Buyer,which 'To Protect Me Public Health and me Environment through Excellence in Ws.tm.ter Systems' Members of the Board Page 2 August 16, 2000 calls itself the authority on municipal bonds since 1891, is a highly regarded source for fixed-income or municipal securities. Others have called them the Wall Street Journal of municipal finance. In the article, which is attached, the paper reports on the stable outlook that the rating agencies noted, and favorably quotes an analyst who remarked that our debt service coverage ratios are "on the high side for an entity of that size. This type of coverage will generate interest and confidence in the upcoming issue. Labor Negotiations The District will be presenting a three-year agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 501, AFL-CIO, to the Board for approval at the August board meeting. This agreement moves the District in the direction of a merit- based pay system and eliminates the step system. This contract also includes a performance based evaluation and compensation committee with members from both Local 501 and management to jointly develop an effective merit-based performance evaluation system. Similarly, the District will be presenting a one-year agreement with the Supervisory, Professional and Management Team (SPMT)to the Board for approval at the September Board meeting. This agreement continues SPMT's merit-based pay system and also includes a committee that will jointly develop an effective merit- based performance evaluation system. Orange County Grand Jury On Monday, August 14, Blake spoke with two new members of the Orange County Grand Jury Environmental Committee and provided an overview of the OCSD operations. The entire six-member committee is scheduled to attend a tour of the OCSD Plant 1 and the Steering Committee meeting on Wednesday, August 23. The Grand Jury is particularly interested in the issue of aging sewer infrastructure (due to the recent news reports—see below) and we are providing them with information about our cooperative projects, our spill response procedures and other related topics. OCSD in the News Beginning on Wednesday, August 9, OCSD was featured as part of an ongoing series of articles on the county's sewage infrastructure and issues affecting beach closures. The news stories appeared in the Orange County Register, Times Orange County Edition, Orange County News Channel (OCN) and KNX radio. Indications Members of the Board Page 3 August 16, 2000 from reporters of both newspapers are that this is an ongoing series of articles. As of Wednesday, August 16, there have been two articles in the Times Orange County Edition and three articles in the Orange County Register. OCN did a follow-up on the Times article and interviewed Lisa Lawson. The articles are included as an accompanying packet and are found in the agenda folders. Included with the articles is information about OCSD's projects and programs in relation to issues addressed in news reports. CASA Award At the California Association of Sanitation Agencies Conference in Monterey last week, OCSD received the Public Service Award for the Huntington Beach Closure Investigation. Chairman Eckenrode received the award on Friday. In the interest of protecting public health and the environment, the goal of the Huntington Beach closure investigation was to identify and eliminate the source of the bacteria impacting the surf zone water quality and the local economy. Between July 1 and September 3, 1999, the Orange County Health Care Agency's health officer closed up to four and a half miles of the eight miles of state and city beaches due to elevated bacterial levels. OCSD staff led a three-month determined search for the pollution source. Extensive offshore and onshore studies indicated the OCSD facilities were not causing the elevated bacteria levels along the coastline. The city of Huntington Beach also conducted investigations. OCSD lead the investigation from June 1999 through November 1999. The District has remained an active participant in the ongoing investigations and studies. Update on Proposition 13—Water Bond Funds The new state budget will include $763.9 million for water quality and recycling programs for this fiscal year; $695 million of these funds come from the sale of Proposition 13 bonds. The lion's share of water bond money this year will be used to fund the Southern California Integrated Watershed Program. The State Water Resources Control Board will provide approximately$133 million to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAW PA) for a variety of water quality activities, including basin water banking; contamination and salt removal processes; water conservation; stormwater management; flood control;and wastewater discharge abatement. Overall, SAW PA will receive$235 million in bond allocations over the next several years. SAW PA conducted a hearing on August 1 to formally adopt distribution of funds that were provided by Proposition 13. The$235 million allocated to the Santa Ana River Watershed includes $37 million for GW RS. We expect that some of the projects Members of the Board Page 4 August 16, 2000 identified under the adopted $235 million total will be delayed or stopped. If this happens, SAW PA and other parties in the watershed believe the money can be re- assigned to other projects. The SARI line relocation project will be an obvious candidate for receiving these re-assigned funds, but will not be known for a year to two. Urban Runoff Update The District is currently accepting urban runoff from the County of Orange (three inland berms to divert the Talbert Channel, Santa Ana River, and Greenville-Banning Channel) and nine City of Huntington Beach flood control pump stations. The District is processing an average of 2 million gallons per day(MGD) of urban runoff, mostly through Plant No. 2. During the August 2, 2000 Ad Hoc Urban Runoff Committee meeting, the committee members accepted staff's recommendation. The policy will move through the District's committees on its way for consideration at the September Board meeting. This proposed option sets an absolute urban runoff flow cap of 10 MGD. It proposes that the District would waive fees for runoff flows less than 4 MGD from dischargers now in our service area and from neighborhoods consisting of domestic and commercial users now paying fees to the District. As a result, the District will cover up to approximately$450,000 annually in operations and maintenance (0&M) costs. In the event that the flows exceed 4 MGD, a Class I industry rate (O&M only)of$321 per million gallons will be collected. Staff will prepare an agenda report for the consideration by the full board at an upcoming meeting. OCSD is participating with the City of Huntington Beach and County of Orange in funding a series of studies designed to identify the source(s) of contamination along Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Phase II studies include watershed sampling; nearshore intensive sampling, metering, and a process dye study; extensive groundwater and sediment sampling; and intensive Talbert Marsh sampling. The majority of the fieldwork was completed in May. The public agencies contributing to the work (City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, and the District) have reviewed the preliminary draft of one consultant's report and are in the process of reviewing another's draft report. The agencies are still waiting for the draft of a third report. Public release of the data is expected in September 2000 after a blue ribbon panel of experts, selected by the National Water Research Institute, reviews the data. At the July 19, 2000 regular meeting, the Board approved $126,020 for additional Phase II costs that have been expended by the City of Huntington Beach. The District's contribution to the Phase 11 work will now total an estimated $215,000. Members of the Board Page 5 August 16, 2000 Orange County Supervisors Lookina to Spend More on Urban Runoff Supervisors Jim Silva and Tom Wilson are recommending a new level of spending to solve the urban runoff problems that impact our beaches. The accompanying article outlines their proposal. McIntyre Unretlresl Seal Beach has appointed Don McIntyre Interim City Manager. Don will serve on a month-to-month contract until a permanent replacement is found. I know that the city will benefit, as we did, from Don's vast experience. Mackerel Fish Kill Over Friday and Saturday, July 28-29, 2000, about 600 dead mackerel washed ashore near the Huntington Beach pier and the Newport Recreational waters pier. There was no obvious cause of death to the fish. California Department of Fish and Game marine biologists believe that the most likely cause was a catch-dump by a fishing vessel several miles offshore. The fish, dead for 2.3 days, were of the same species and approximate size, which is consistent with a fishing vessel dump and not a natural or contamination event that would kill multiple species. As a result, Fish and Game indicated that they would not be running any additional tests on these fish. Due to the concern about health effects from the decaying fish in the surfzone, Larry Honeybourne from the Orange County Health Care Agency contacted a representative from the Department of Health Services' (OHS) communicable disease unit. DHS assured Mr. Honeybourne that there was no risk to human health from the fish. Bfosolids General Order Update The State Water Resource Control Board recently held two workshops to receive comments on the General Order for the use of biosolids in California and its associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The workshops were held in Santa Giants on August 1,2000 and Sacramento on August 3, 2000. District's staff provided comments in support of the General Order at both workshops. The General Order and the EIR will be considered for adoption and certification during the regularly scheduled SW RCB Meeting in Sacramento on August 17, 2000. The SW RCB based the General Order on the extensive research performed by United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)during its development of the federal biosolids regulation (503 Rule) and studies that were conducted in the last Members of the Board Page 6 August16, 2000 few years. Accordingly, the General Order for the use of biosolids in California protects water quality, public health, safety, and non-water environment, based on the best available information. The General Order includes more requirements than those found in the federal 503 Rule, and reflects a cautious approach towards regulating biosolids in California. The EIR performed on the General Order provides a full environmental impact analysis for the issuance of General Order biosolids land application permits. Attached for your review is an article on the Santa Clarita workshop that appeared in the August 2, 2000 edition of the Bakersfield Californian. Also attached is a letter of support for the General Order from Assemblyman Campbell. One More Example of Biosolfds Woes Our sister agency in the west end of San Bernardino County, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, has been composting biosolids and dairy manure for several years on a well-designed and operated site in the south end of the Chino Dairy Preserve. They are proposing to vacate the site and move to the west toward Chino Hills and construct larger, state-of-the-art facilities that incorporate odor control systems. The accompanying newspaper article covers the initial public reaction to the proposal. Some people in Chino Hills don't like the idea. How weird is that?! NRDC Beach Report In early August, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) released is annual report "resting the Waters 2000". The report summarizes beach health warnings issued as the result of bacterial contamination. Nationwide the number of these warnings increased with California leading the nation in the number of incidents. It is important to view that statistic in the context that as more states monitor recreational water quality there will be more incidents, and that of those states with adequate programs, California is probably doing the best job. All but four states have some type of beach monitoring and public notification program in place. Eleven states have comprehensive programs. It is California's aggressive program mandated by Assembly Bill 411 that results in the high number of health warnings. As monitoring programs improve, a better and more comprehensive picture of microbial water quality at recreational beaches is obtained. This information can then allow beach users to make informed decisions about when and where they choose to swim and by local, state and federal agencies to identify chronic problems that need to be addressed. NRDC also hopes that this information can be used to get the Senate to Members of the Board Page 7 August 16, 2000 pass HR 999, the Beach Bill, which has already made it through the House. In California, nearly$310 million of state and federal monies will be available over the next 15 years for public education as well as study and abatement of land run off issues. Nearly 60%of that$310 million is earmarked for six southern California counties. Please see the (several) accompanying newspaper articles. NDMA Investigation In April of this year, levels of a chemical known as NDMA exceed the state drinking water action level in 2 producing wells near the seawater intrusion barrier operated by the Orange County Water District. NDMA is one of the chemicals referred to as a "nitrosamine", and it is classified as a probable carcinogen. The State Department of Health Services has established an interim action level of 20 parts per trillion (ppt)for drinking water. The effluent from OCW D's Water Factory 21 typically exceeds that value by approximately ten-fold. We have determined that a significant amount of NDMA is present in the feed-water to WF21, our Plant 1 effluent. We began an immediate investigation into the potential sources. The investigation, to date, has concluded that our wastewater treatment process does not produce NDMA. However,the influent to Plant 1 contains NDMA. The results of three separate studies lead to the conclusions that NDMA levels can be as high 2000 parts per trillion (ppt) or 100 times the interim drinking water limit. Much of the chemical comes into the plant between noon and midnight. By the way, 'significant' is a relative term. One thousand ppt is approximately 2 1/2 ounces in 20 million gallons per day of sewer flow. Additional studies are being performed on NDMA in each of the trunklines. Based on several reports in the scientific literature, our project team has assumed that NDMA itself, or a precursor(s)to NDMA, is being produced as a byproduct of industrial processes within the wastewater drainage area. The goal and hope is to identify one or a few industrial dischargers. There is no limit specified in our ocean discharge permit for NDMA levels and, therefore, have not had a reason to previously establish a limit to industrial discharges of this chemical. This will probably change. If a source(s) is identified, the strategy will be to discuss the implications with the industry and work together to find solutions. If a voluntary approach does not work, then we can establish limits in our ordinance and enforce compliance, if necessary. Members of the Board Page 8 August 16, 2000 Opposition to Recent Water Transfer One of the great hopes we have in Southern California for solving our future water supply needs is to buy water from agricultural interests that have abundant quantities of water--at least during the wet years. What is often overlooked, however, is the great deal of opposition there is to this idea in the environmental community. Whether this opposition can be overcome in the long run is anybody's guess. Attached to this letter is a recent commentary in the Fresno Bee that articulates most of the arguments that have been made to justify opposition to proposed and potential transfers. I include it in this board letter to give you a glimpse of the Central Valley environmental side of the argument. Lessons from Texas The Texas drought has hit the state hard. Attached is one example from Electra, Texas. The lesson is this: Droughts have and will come to California as they are now appearing in Texas and other parts of the country. One more reason for GW RS. Odor Complaints Five odor complaints were received over the July 29-30 weekend with four directed to Plant 2. One of the reasons for the increase is our outreach to the community on our odor control master plant project(J-71-4). As part of this process we formed a Community Advisory Committee (CAC). The CAC's function is to assist us in understanding the offsite odor impacts and to participate in near-term and long-term future solutions to controlling odors. As part of this process we have been hosting "smell"tours of the treatment plants for the surrounding residents. We held one this past Saturday (July 29) with a turnout of 15 to 20 people. We distributed surveys to those attending and requested that they record certain information when they smell odors. These surveys will be turned into us at the end of August and will help focus our offsite modeling efforts to target highest priority odor sources. Involving the community can result in increased odor complaints, however, in the long term their participation will benefit us and them. Attached is a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Members of the Board Page 9 August 16,2000 Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. z ould like addi � � information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA.jt HMPOTAV MIHG�MEHS TO THE BOMONUB2b0.0pL Attachments Orange County Sanitation District, CA's Refunding Certificates of Participation Rated AA/A-1+ Robert Sakai, San Francisco(1) 415371-5015; Peter Block, San Francisco (1)415-371-5044 SAN FRANCISCO (Standard & Poor's CreditWire) Aug. 3, 2000-- Standard & Poor's today assigned its double- `A' /'A-l'-plus rating to Orange County Sanitation District, Calif. 's $230 million refunding certificates of participation (COPs) series 2000. The advance refunding component of the COPs is scheduled to sell Aug. 15, 2000, and the current refunding component is scheduled to sell Aug. 30, 2000. The outlook is stable. The long-term rating reflect the following strengths: -- Strong financial performance with very strong reserve levels; -- Low rates, which will remain low as the district implements its large but manageable capital plan with a high pay-as-you-go component; and -- A strong and diversified service area economy, one of the best performers in southern California. The short-term rating is based on a standby bond purchase agreement (SBPA) provided by Dexia Credit Local de France ( `A- l'-plus) for the purchase price of unremarketed bonds. The SBPA covers principal plus 37 days' interest at the maximum variable rate (12%) and expires on August 31, 2005, unless earlier terminated or extended according to its terms. The certificates are being issued for refunding purposes and reimbursement of prior district expenditures and are secured by a first lien on net revenues of the district's wastewater system, including the district's share of ad valorem taxes. Legal provisions consist of a 1.25x rate covenant and projected 1.25x maximum annual debt service additional bonds test. The district provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to approximately 2 .4 million people (92% of the Orange County population) in a . 470 square mile service area (59% of the county) . The district's service area includes 23 of the county's 33 cities as well as unincorporated areas of the county. Financial performance has been strong and is expected to remain strong with good coverage of debt service and very high cash reserve levels. Debt service coverage has been strong with coverage of at least 2.38 times (x) since 1996 with connection fees and 2 .06x without connection fees. Projected debt service coverage, including future debt issuances, gradually will be reduced but will still remain good at 1.91x by 2005 and 1.58x by 2009. The district has an exceptionally strong cash position. on an unrestricted basis, the district ended fiscal 1999 with $220 million of unrestricted cash and investments equal to 1,627 days of operating expenses. When including monies restricted for capital uses, the actual reserve amounts available to the district totaled $343 million or 2, 536 days of operating expenses. This amount is actually the projected low point for reserves through 2010, with $507.5 million expected at the end of 2010. To help fund the capital improvement program, about $729.8 million of additional debt will be issued through 2010. A $109 million issuance is expected next year. The district capital improvement plan through 2020 totals about $1.53 billion, with $1.24 billion of capital expenditures planned through 2010. The 20-year capital plan will be allocated 35% for additional capacity, 43% for rehabilitation/replacement, 3% for improved treatment, 8% for a groundwater replenishment system, and 11% for cooperative projects/support facilities such as water conservation and member city inflow/infiltration funding. The district anticipates funding approximately 50% of the capital plan with cash. Rates are very low, as the district's single-family home user rate is $80/year plus a $28/year property tax component. When including the average typical local agency sewer fee of $28/year (for local collection and conveyance) , the average single-family home total annual sewer service charge is only $136/year, or $11.33/month. The district has adopted rate increases through 2002, when it approved a 5-year rate increase plan in 1998. The district single-family home user rate will be $87 .78 by 2002. Additional moderate inflationary increases are planned through 2009, at which time the district's annual rate would be a still very low $117.95. Rates are billed and collected through the property tax bill. The district wastewater system consists of two wastewater treatment plants with a combined primary treatment capacity of 276 million gallons per day (mgd) and combined 170 mgd of secondary treatment capacity. Actual flows in 1999 were an average of 241 mgd. There are no immediate system capacity constraints, and the relatively modern infrastructure allows for incremental expansion. Approximately one-half of the primary treated wastewater is blended with the secondary treated water and then discharged to the ocean. The district's current discharge permit (NPDRS) includes a Clean Water Act section 301(h) waiver of secondary treatment requirements, which is effective through June 6, 2003 and is renewable every five years. All conditions of the permit are being successfully met, but the time frame for how long into the future the waiver will be granted is uncertain. However, the district has incorporated the possibility of going to full secondary treatment in its capital plan . This would result in the addition of $400 million to the 20-year capital plan and • an additional $11 million in annual operation and maintenance expense. Certificates are initially issued in the weekly mode and may be converted to bear interest in the daily, extended, or fixed-rate mode. The certificates are subject to mandatory and optional redemptions as well as mandatory tenders. Holders of daily and weekly rate certificates may optionally tender bonds. Mandatory tender of certificates are required for interest mode change dates, the day following each extended rate period, five-days prior to expiration or substitution of the SBPA, and prior to early termination of the SBPA due to an event of default that has triggered termination of the facility. OUTLOOK: STABLE The outlook reflects the expectation of continued strong financial performance with very high cash reserve levels, as the district implements its large but manageable capital plan, Standard & Poor's said. -- CreditWire Trse Bonn Berea a Tuesday,August 8,2000 3 THE BOND BUYER® Orange County Sanitation Deal Smells Like a Rose ra,n,wo D B Orc$u¢1u 33 New YaarH I14 vnos:ztamtamo•rztz-eaaasia �°1or "r,w"r"a5 13"m'ams By Deborah limestone remain manageable.The district a next and g the third largest wastewater a i. 5 I,a.ra�w_wewv.w. _ pates issuing Judi million over the next charger west of the Mississippi River. N.Ynml Pdltx-n..mm�er The Orange County Sanitation Dis- 10years, including a $109 million is- Standard&Poor's also assigned a AA trld is set to sell$220 million variable- nuance next year. rating,citing the district's strong reserve rate,refunding certificates of participa- - Cary Started, district director of fi- level. 5 Ny,W Pdlbr-Ymg . c$wceprr -saw sum„. [ion on or about Aug. 15. mince,fads secure with the district hav- On an unrestricted basis, the district Of that, $180 million would refund ing io much variable-rate debt. ended fiscal year.1999 with$220 mil- outstanding certificates issued between "We're fortunate enough to [have]ac- lion cash and investments,equal to 1,627 1990 and 1992. whereas the remaining cumulate[d] enough funds so our port- days of operating expenses. $40 million would reimburse the district folio serves as an interest rate hedge;' Their debt service coverage has been for past capital expenditures. he said. at least 2.38 times since 1996.While it is PaineWebherInc.will negotiate the The deal is expected to trade at daily projected to decline because of future variable-rate deal, which the district rates,but includes a provision that would debt,it will remain good: 1.91 times by found to be less costly than a fixed rate, enable it to convert to weekly. 2005 and 1.58 times by 2009 although it leaves them more vulnera- "We've always said it,but we've nev- "That's on the high side for an entity ble to possible interest-rate hikes. er done it," Saved said. "We haven't of that site,"said Robert Sakai,a Stan- "If rates rise substantially,it could af- found it to be advantageous." dud&Poor's analyst. feet the cost of their debt;'said Jessica, The district has also left the door open The district's operating and capital Salts,an analyst for Fitch. But the raw to switch to a fixed rate,which they did costs would increase significantly if they ing agency assigned a AA to the district for 1992 and 1993 issuances,Saved said. fail to renew their deep-ocean discharge because they have about$350 million in Certificates are backed by a first lien on permit,which expires in three years.But liquid assets,she said.'"TWs entity could the wastewater system's net revenues and the district "absolutely" intends to re- cover a rise in interest rates.Very, very the district's share of ad valorem taxes. new it, Streed said, avoiding an addi- few municipal entities have that kind of Fitch assigned the AA with a stable tional $400 million in capital costs liquidity." outlook for the district's superb fiscal through 2020. This COP deal marks the beginning management and flexibility,consistent- After this issue,the district will have of a long-term, $1.6 billion capital im- ly positive operating margins, substan- about$403 million in outstanding pari- pnivement plan, including a proposed tial cash balances, diverse revenue ty bonds. As of January 2000, the dis- groundwater-replenishment system. sources, strong service area, and cus- trict has no general obligation debt. However, both Fitch and Standard & tomer base. Moody's Investors Service has not Poor's said the district's debt levels will The district serves 2.4 million people yet published its rating on this issue. ❑ Press Release FjTI _ RICH Ok'A,UUR YRmIR FITW One SmR Sbecl Plaza New York,NY 10004 (212)900-OB10 www.lkehmOngs.com Fitch Rates Orange County Sanitation District Bonds AA' Fitch-NY-August 1, 2000: Fitch, .the international rating agency, assigns its `AA' rating to Orange County Sanitation District, CA's $220, 695,000 refunding certificates of participation, series 2000. The certificates are expected to sell by negotiation with PaineWebber .Incorporated on or .about Aug. 15, 2000. The `AA' rating reflects the Orange County Sanitation District's underlying rating Payment of the purchase price of certificates tendered for optional purchase and mandatory purchase is expected to be secured by a standby certificate purchase agreement provided by. Dexia Public Finance Bank; Dexia Public Finance Bank's short-term rating,is `F1+', .A rating on the variable-rate transaction will be provided closer to closing. - The district serves approximately 2-, 4 .million people in the northern and central portions of Orange county and is the third largest wastewater discharge system west of the Mississippi River, On average the system treats 240 million gallons (mg/d) of wastewater per day. Superb fiscal management has positioned the district well, providing for flexibility as it prepares to undertake continued capital improvements . Although the district does plan to continue utilizing variable rate obligations, liquidity levels are expected to remain stable and significant through the forecast period. Credit strengths include strong financial operations, characterized by consistently positive operating margins, substantial cash balances, as. ,well as diverse revenue sources. Liquidity is very strong, with cash on hand equal to about 2.7 years of operating revenues and 7 . 6 years of operation and maintenance expenses. Other strengths include the strong service area and customer base. The service area is diverse with strong economic indicators and positive trends. County employment and wealth levels exceed both the stateand nation. Users are primarily residential with the top 10 largest customer totaling a low 3 . 1% of revenue. Rates are moderate and projected to remain competitive. E/l 'd MO ON ONI. VOHI H31H AHNI 000Z '1 MV Press Release FrTCH eI(OIflG.WIf h H1YlA5 one ptm anne mm . - - New York,NY 100 . - (212)90 10 _. www.fiW na0n0s.cam Offsetting credit factors include the potential failure to renew the district' s deep-ocean discharge permit. Pursuant to section 301 (h) of the Clean water Act, the district. operates under a modified discharge permit expiringin three years , This permit allows for deep-ocean discharge. of- a blend. of, primary and. . secondarily treated effluent; Extension of this permit is assumed, yet the costs. associated. ($400 million). to add additional secondary capacity to the system could be .absorbed without increasing ratea,.,to. unreasonable- levels. The district' s capital improvement, plan s.extensi,ve and includes both cash and - debt supported financings._. pLthough,. expacted to remain manageable, debt service costs. will� increase as-the district is projected to issue $664 mill}on in,long, term dipbt over the next 10 years as part of a $1.6 billion capital plan, Lastly, the district's exposure to varisble rate risk is above average. . Including this issue, approximately_ 57% of. the district's debt portfolio will consist of variable rate obligations. Exposure to rising interest rates presents a credit concern, although the district' s strong cash balances help mitigate this risk. Fitch is an international rating agency that provides global capital market investors with the highest quality ratings and research. Dual headquartered in New York and London with a major office in Chicago, Fitch rates entities in 75 countries and has some 1, 100 employees in more than 40 local offices worldwide. The agency, which is a combination of Fitch IBCA and Duff S Phelps Credit Rating Co., provides ratings for Financial Institutions, Insurance, Corporates, Structured Finance, Sovereigns and Public Finance Markets worldwide. contact: Jeffrey B. Burger 1-425-732-5618, Jessica L. Soltz 1- 415-732-5616, San Francisco; Jason F. Dickerson 1-212-908-0684, New York. CA 'd 9LZO 'ON Al V381 N5119 Wd6C d1 OOOVI My County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 1 of 4 aQ news ome age q M T191 OM910211=0O THE ORANGE couNrY REGISTER I HW i SEARCH top stories HOMEPAGE TODAY'S NEWS :Front Page County's sewage systems full of :N 'a inequities ARCHIVES AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS a FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE: There is little regional OCJOBIFINDER CILASSF planning among the dozens of agencies, some of COLUMNS which are nearing a crisis with aging pipes. COMeUc YNEWS w EDUCATION August 11, 2000 FUN a GAMES ENTERTAINMENT HEALTH a FITNESS By TERI SFORZA and MARLA JO FISHER LIBERTY ONLINE LIVING 8 SHOPPING The Orange CountyRegister POLITICS a GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE Some of the pipes channeling sewage beneath Orange County's SCIENCE a streets are made of clay,just like the ones in Rome 2,000 years TECHNOLOGY ago. Others are molded from 21 sbcentury plastic. PROMOTIONS SPORTS S RECREATION TRAVEL Some are scrubbed, inspected and vigorously maintained by WEATHER special districts flush in cash. Others are crumbling in the hands of cities with barely $100,000 set aside to replace them. There are a dizzying three dozen different agencies handling Orange County's sewage, and theirs is a tangled tale of haves and have-nots that has a profound effect not only on the public health,but also on the County's environment, tourist economy and continued growth. While everyone acknowledges that sewage is a vital public concern, there is little regional planning for what many expect to be a major infrastructure crisis over the next several decades, and a jealous guarding of funds between disparate districts whose pipes may overlap,but whose intentions and budgets do not. "This is the nightmare of the 21 at century-not just for Orange County or California,but for the entire Country," said Mark Petracca,political-science professor at the University of California, Irvine. "We've neglected the infrastructure in this country since World War II, and the cost of replacing it is going to be so astronomical it'll dwarf the cost of the Cold War." Consider: . The Irvine Ranch Water District and the city <147,2,0>of Huntington Beach are roughly the same size, each handling sewage for more than 200,000 people. But Irvine Ranch spends about$8.5 million a year to maintain its sewers,while http://www,ocregister.com/search/2000081 l/news/sewer008 1 I cci4.shtml 08/15/2000 County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 2 of 4 Huntington Beach spends less than$600,000. . . The El Toro Water District and the city of Cypress are roughly the same size, each handling sewage for about 50,000 people. El Toro spends$2.9 million on maintenance,while Cypress spends$150,000. . Moulton Niguel Water District and the city of Garden Grove are roughly the same size, each handling sewage for about 170,000 people.But Moulton Niguel spends$7 million on maintenance,while Garden Grove spends $1.4 million. The situation is getting acute. Orange County's aging sewer systems spewed 57 million gallons of gunk into creeks,streets and lawns over the past four years,threatening public health and leading to at least 109 beach closures up and down the coast, a Register survey found. Figures from the Orange County Health Care Agency show that there were 1,108 sewer spills reported between 1996 and July 2000. About half of the 57 million gallons-28.4 million --was the worst kind of spill: raw sewage. That's enough human waste to fill 28.4 Olympic-size swimming pools. The biggest culprit in nearly all the raw-sewage spills was broken sewer pipes,part of a crumbling infrastructure beneath the streets. The next biggest culprits also were functions of aging or overtaxed systems: failing pumps and blocked sewer lines. "More people,more sewage,more problems," said Homer Bludau,Newport Beach city manager. "That'll require more money for expansion and upgrading the size of the lines.There should be a regional approach, ...but there isn't." CITIES AT DISADVANTAGE? The disparities between the haves and the have-nots inspire many sighs in older cities. "Special districts are in the business of dealing with sanitation issues exclusively,whereas that's not the only focus of a city," said John Reekstin, director of administrative services for Huntington Beach. "In a city there are a lot of competing issues,like police and fire protection." Many people don't even know special districts exist.They are holdovers from the county's rural days when there were no cities to provide services. But as the county grew up and urbanized, the districts did not go away.Many collect millions in property taxes in addition to the fees they charge for services. And many become very wealthy.The Moulton Niguel Water http://www.ocregister.com/sc=h/20000811/news/sewer00811 cci4.shtml 08/15/2000 County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 3 of 4 District was singled out in a state report for having tremendous reserves: It took in$56.7 million in 1996-97 -and had$216.1 million in retained earnings. That makes it one of the richest special districts in California- and it was also one of the leading sewage spillers in Orange County. Also singled out for having huge amounts of money was the Irvine Ranch Water District($77.4 million in revenues and $279.6 million in retained earnings). "Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi- million dollar reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional or statewide infrastructure planning," said the Little Hoover Commission in a recent report. The state-ap<147,1,1>pointed panel studies how to improve local government. "These enormous public resources also are largely unknown and unexamined by the public or policy-makers." While the report blasts some districts for amassing so much money, and urges the Legislature to pass laws putting a cap on how much special districts can accumulate,the districts defend their financial practices as prudent. "We have a$2 billion investment in the ground. It's something we really have to maintain and protect," said Paul Jones, general manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District. The district owns a$33 million luxury apartment complex with three heated swimming pools and two lighted tennis courts in Anaheim Hills, as an investment. It's also a limited partner in another apartment complex in Aliso Viejo. Like Irvine Ranch,Moulton Niguel said it's putting money aside for the day its systems need to be replaced. "We have certain obligations, and what we're trying to do is match our reserves to our obligations," said Tom Hammatt,controller. "We have to put aside a certain amount of money for bond- rating agencies and repayment of debt." 'READY TO BLOW' When you're a city like Garden Grove,those sorts of arguments are hard to swallow.The city recently absorbed the Garden Grove Sanitary District, and all the problems that go along with it. Most of the system is "clay pipes, the same type they used in the days of Rome," said Garden Grove Councilman Hill Dalton. "Very old, 50 or 60 years old," said Councilman Mark Leyes. "They kept saying it would last until we're all dead, and they were all 70 years old, so they were probably right. "We have seen some sewer breaks. We had one collector line next to a storm drain that broke three times since we took it over, and we had to go in and excavate it. ... Our fear is that we http://www.ocregister.com/search/20000811/news/sewer0081 I cci4.shtml 08/15/2000 County's sewage systems full of inequities Page 4 of 4 have other lines like that ready to blow, because of the lack of investment." ' Leyes'sense of fairness is tested when he looks at the books of the Orange County Sanitation District-the agency charged with treating and disposing of the waste that cities and other special districts generate. The Sanitation District has an operating budget of$60 million, and reserves of$374.5 million. "They argue they need that money because it's the replacement value of their system," said Leyes,who is Garden Grove's representative on the Sanitation District board. "But how much is a prudent reserve?It should be somewhere between the half- billion dollars that the county has, and the zero dollars the city has." Keith Boillot was foreman of the 1981-82 Orange County grand jury, which hired Price Waterhouse to do an extensive study of special districts. Its report damned the duplication in the system and urged districts to merge and dissolve-by name. There have been some consolidations since then,but the system is essentially unchanged. "That's a major problem when you have so many agencies-the left hand never seems to know what the right hand is doing. It's time for another grand jury to take a look at these things." Register staff writers Pat Brennan,Natalya Shulyakovskaya and Barbara Kingsley contributed to this report. newspaperF nra untY,calnoma — ,1�egisfer`. Copyright 20M The OmnV County Register Please san0 cmnments too !sler�link freeCo m http://www.ocregister.com/search/20000811/news/sower0081 I cci4.shtml 08/15/2000 ABCNEWS.com : More beaches Closed Due to rollution rage I of j GO Kids GO FamiW I GO Mon" 1 GO Snorts I GO Nome sear I ABOUT GO NETWORK I SIGN IN I FREE E-MAIL I: ABCNEM `National Wildlife Federation® r WEB %1AwM=T!L1 -7 •I.Sa® Credit Card. ,l I search ►HOME►NEWS SUMMARY polluted Waters Opus. Ilk POLITICS Study: More Warnings, ►WORLD Closings Due to Pollution ►MONEYSCOPE /BUSINESS at U.S. Beaches ►TECHNOLOGY _ ►SCIENCE 'f►Y polluted Ignore a sign warning of oSan Diego runoff oat Tourmaline.,.Ii Park ►HEALTH&LIVING I j1 -�� n San Diego on Thursday.Tourmal ne ►TRAVEL eT _ _ has permanent warnings posted du•to ►ESPN SPORTS w'�+ —? - high tuitions levels found in the water. <" j (Denis Pcroy'AP Photo) ►ENTERTAINMENT ►WEATHER.com Y ►REFERENCE ►LOCAL ►ABCNEWS ON TV ONEW9. SCIENCE HEADLINES Aug.7—In some states, going to the beach Ppllgtien•t u s. could be bad for your health. Butlers Dehale Ov.,Andieiel A newly released annual report by the Natural Recle Resources Defense Council shows that beach Students Zap Teachers to Learn Ph ice closings due to bacterial contamination reached Russian Coa_monsuts unusually high numbers last year for the second year Will Return to Island Vacation in a row. Computer M•P$old Officials issued more than 6,000 warnings and, in Volcano in Oregon some cases,closed their sands to the public in 1999. "Too many of our beaches are contaminated ... a day at the beach should not be followed by a day at ►SPECIAL SERVICES the doctor's,"says Nancy Stoner,director of the ►Shopping Guide NRDC's Water Project. ►Auto Section ►SEARCH ►ABC.com Micro Bugs in the Water Is Turbolli Swimming in bacterial contaminated waters can ►EMAIL cause a variety of afflictions including gastroenteritis, ABCNE WS.com fever,vomiting,skin rashes and ear,nose and eye IP SEND A FRIEND TO infections. These symptoms are more serious in the ►TOOLS AND elderly and very young. HELPERS This year's report from the nonprofit environmental group shows that beach closings and advisories were actually more numerous in 1998 and 1999 due to unusually high El NiHo-related pollution problems and widespread drought. But over the past decade, beach closings have risen steadily. This past http://abcnews.go.conVsections/science/DailyNews/beaches000803.htmi 08/07/2000 ABCNEWS.com :More Beaches Closed Due to Pollution Page 2 of 3 year's closings and warnings were twice higher than those issued in 1997. ' "Closings and advisories continue to occur at record levels,"says Sarah Chasis,a senior attorney and head of the group's water and coastal program. "We want rules that require sewer systems to have adequate capacity and be maintained so that they do the job they were designed for." More Monitoring Part of the rise in closures and advisories is due to an increase in beach monitoring by state and local authorities. Since 1991,new monitoring programs have been initiated or expanded in at least nine states. Stoner says states have good reason to watch over their waters since beachgoing in the United States amounts to a$50 billion a year industry in water- based recreation and more than$100 billion a year in tourism dollars. "Reducing beach water pollution is an investment that makes sense,not only because of the economic value of clean water but also because beach water pollution makes people sick,"Chasis told a news conference called to release the report Of the 32 states in the study,California accounted for more than half of the beach closures and warnings issued in 1999,with 3,547,followed by Florida with 671. Inland state Ohio recorded 257 while the U.S.Virgin Islands had 307. Poor Prevention Chasis said that despite the increase in warnings, inconsistent monitoring of the nation's beaches remains a problem. She pointed out that even if a state regularly tests its waters,officials might not close beaches when a problem arises. The NRDC has called on Congress to pass a federal beach bill enforcing stricter rules that is still pending in the Senate,and has urged President Clinton to five up to his promise to establish federal rules to eliminate raw sewage discharge. The study issued a"Beach Bum"list for states that did not regularly monitor ocean or bay beach water for swimming safety.These were Louisiana, Oregon,Texas and Washington states. "Beach buddies"—places where beaches were monitored more than once a week and closed when needed—were East Haven Town Beach in http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/beaches000803.htrnl 08/07/2000 ABCNEWS.com : More Beaches Closed Due to Pollution Page 3 of 3 Connecticut,North Beach and Oceanside at Assateague Island National Seashore in Maryland, and Revere Beach and Short Beach in Massachusetts. Only 11 states comprehensively monitored most or all of their beaches and notified the public. These are California,Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois,Indiana,New Hampshire,New Jersey,North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania. More than two-thirds of beach closings and warnings last year were due to high bacteria levels in the water. Others were a result of pollution caused by sewage treatment plant failures, for example, or by heavy rains that carry pollution into swimming waters. ■ ABCNEWS.com's Amanda Onion, ABCNEWS Radio and Reuters contributed to this report. SEARCH ABCNEWS.eom FOR MORE ON... eaches, pollution SEEM Copyright 02000 ABC News Internet Ventures.Click here -® for Terms of Use and 11rh nc) Vnlic, and Internet Na teh Information applicable to this site. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/sciencefDailyNews/beaches000803.html 08/07/2000 LA Times P lwe of vis�a Internet Visa , NZ1:<R HOTC I Archyes I Print Eptnion I HOTe.Re_litery I Ad rise I Site Mep I Feetlbad I Help News Business Sports hitn/hinw+ir lalimes.wMnewslstale/20000804rt000073052.html Politics Travel Connmen%M Entertainment Classifieds Shopping muss.monies.as IQU hsm_€s. Back to story U restaurants Qrs,ren a s Friday,August 4, 2000 Beach Closings Reach Record Levels in State ■Environment: Survey finds 3,547 instances of pollution problems last year. By SEEMA MEHTA.Times Slae Writer Califomia s fabled coastline is far more polluted than previously thought. From San Diego to San Francisco,hundreds of new areas were closed or posted last year because of dangerous ocean bacteria,according to a study by the Natural Resources Defense Council released Thursday. Beaches along the state's 1,100-mile coast were closed for the day or posted with warnings a record 3,547 times,more than half of the national total of 6,160, according to the study. And while the nation saw a 15%decline in reports of polluted beaches from 1998 to 1999, California's numbers grew 8%. The problem is particularly acute in the Southern California counties of Los Angeles,Orange, San Diego and Santa Barbara,the report found. Some of the increase was the result of changes in state law that went into effect last year,requiring more stringent monitoring. California now has one of the toughest programs in the country. But that testing shows the water we swim, surf and fish in is often loaded with pollution. "The more we look,the more problems we find," said Alex Helperin,an attorney with the environmental watchdog group. On any given day in Southern California,miles of beaches were off-limits or posted with signs warning that water contact could cause illness. The ocean off Rincon Beach and Rincon Point, legendary surf spots in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, was a health hazard for 116 days last year. Sewage,animals droppings and urban runoff regularly fouled Doheny State Beach,a bird- watchers'paradise off Dana Point, spiking bacteria counts to unsafe levels for nearly half of 1999. The survey of 230 coastal and Great Lakes communities was conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and data were compiled and analyzed by the council. Reaction to the numbers was mixed,with many state officials and academics saying the study was a troubling but accurate snapshot,especially of often invisible pollutants contained in runoff. Los Angeles County officials,who were cited in the report along with Orange County for underreporting the number of http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 3 beach advisories, said the watchdog group is overstating the problems. - But Carl Safina, a recently named MacArthur Fellow for his study of the world's oceans, said that the study should be considered a"minimal estimate" and that he believes pollution problems are much worse in California and elsewhere. "Most people think that. . . ocean pollution comes from oil spills and from ships, which is a tiny percent of what actually gets into the ocean," Safina said. "Much more pollution gets into the ocean from farms, livestock,farm pesticides, lawn chemicals and human sewage and industrial chemicals that get into air and then fall into the ocean. [Runoff) is by far the biggest source of ocean pollution." Runoff was cited as a major problem in the Golden State--at least 47%of high bacteria counts were caused by pollutants that washed off streets and lawns into storm drains that eventually dump into the ocean,according to the study. "Runoff is the No. 1 threat to public health and water quality at this time in California," said Mary Nichols,the governor's secretary of resources. "We've made major progress in other areas of toxic pollution.In our storm water runoff, we see both chemicals and biological pathogens that are harmful to people and harmful to the environment. . . . It's absolutely critical to get this problem under control." The problem is particularly acute in Southern California,which included four counties that reported the highest number of beach closure and posting days. Santa Barbara County reported 1,392 postings last year,almost all because of urban,agricultural and creek runoff. San Diego came in second with 685 closings and postings. More than 75%of Orange County's 502 postings were because of elevated bacteria from contaminated runoff. More than 90%of Los Angeles County s 460 postings and closures were from elevated bacteria from unknown causes,suspected to be runoff. Los Angeles has "one of the worst storm water problems in the nation,"the study said. Los Angeles County health officials disputed that conclusion. "The overwhelming majority of beach areas are safe and good every day of the year,except when it rains," said Jack Petralia,director of environmental protection in the county's Department of Health Services.He said some runoff problems,such as pollution after rain storms, is simply unavoidable. Others state officials found the California numbers particularly disconcerting because they had expected a turnaround last year. State officials and activists knew the 1998 numbers would be high,because heavy El Nilio rains flooded sewage systems and washed loads of pollutants into the ocean. But 1999,a La Nina year with near drought-like conditions,which means fewer sewage problems and runoff,should have shown far lower numbers than 1998,according to the report. The expected drop occurred across the rest of the nation,but not in California. About 80%of California's population lives within 30 miles of the coast, making conditions ripe for runoff problems. Natural Resources Defense Council officials said California needs to take the next step and tackle the problem. David Beckman, senior attorney with the group,said monitoring is better in California,but it "is not going to solve the problem." "It's like going to the doctor to get a test result,"Beckman said. "We have gotten the test result and its positive--not good,positive in a medical sense. Legislators and county health authorities have to come up with answers for this problem. it's now evident.Nobody can deny it any longer." http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/072000 LA Times Page 3 of 3 State officials say they are trying.Gov. Gray Davis included$5 million in this year's budget to fund tougher enforcement in the long inactive regional water boards across the state.The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board has issued a string of cleanup orders and fines against ocean polluters in recent months. A handful of other states are trying to institute tougher standards as well. The federal "Beach Bill",which would require consistent water quality testing around the nation,was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives,and is awaiting action in the Senate. krtk More Closures The number of reported beach closures and advisories in the state increased 8%from 1998 to 1999,to 3,547,with Santa Barbara County having the most. copftht 2000 tos a,se�ri e `z' �$ Tired of credit card debt? http://www.latimes.com/egi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 LA Times Page 1 of 2 �. i� Experiencethe newest coolest advertising technology / Tw � technology here at latimes.com... - r Home I Ayr -him I Pan i iPn I I m HHno ¢_[el Advertise I s Map i F--ite_ _ — '.'.:mkt Hey News Business Sports hftp:iAw .latimes.wmne science/environ20000804Adp0010475.he I Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Shopping muss.mwiee.an. iocs.hp�.:. Back to story_ Ty.muiu2 oars n. Friday, August 4,2000 Report: A little rain enough for closures ■ Annual nationwide report shows even a light rain--not a massive deluge --can force beach closures through runoff. By ALEXceeLMAN Drier weather in recent years has not prevented increases in the number of Orange County beach closures, according to a report released Thursday by the National Resources Defense Council and Defend the Bay. The report, "Testing the Waters 2000," is a nationwide report on the condition of American oceans, bays and lakes, detailing the levels of closures in recent years and the probable causes for those events. Most remarkable for Orange County, said Alex Helperin,project attorney with the council,was the contrast between 1998,when El Nino weather patterns brought heavy mins,and 1999,which was unusually dry. Despite the difference in rainfall,the report concluded,county beach closures actually increased. "What the numbers say to us is that this problem is not going away,and we need to do something about that," Helperin said. At least two factors probably contributed to the study's results,Helperin said. One has to do with the behavior of urban runoff,which is suspected as the cause of 73%of county beach closures. Though runoff may be carried to the ocean by rainfall, Helperin said the report's numbers suggest that even minimal precipitation can muck up the coast as effectively as a more massive deluge. "It doesn't take too much min to wash the stuff down," Helperin said. "We may be seeing that you get the same sorts of effect(with slight rains)." Also clearly a factor affecting the report's numbers for California is Assembly Bill 411,which put into place stricter standards for posting and closing beaches starting in the summer of 1999. The bill, county health care officials have said, is making once-acceptable levels of contamination show up as problem areas. But Bob Caustin,founding director of the Newport Beach environmental organization Defend the Bay,said that is no reason to dismiss the report as a statistical aberration. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 2 "The more we look,the more problems we see," he said. "The question is, what are we going to do about it?" Coming to grips with the issue raised by the study will be challenging, Caustin said. "When you're trying to track down a source for,say,the Rhine Channel, that's one thing," he said. "But there's 154 square miles of watershed that have to be worked with." CoWgh12000 Los Mgeles Imes Hot Deals Les Vegas 07 trave scape.rom Click http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 CNN....: Beach closings down, but health problem persists-August 3, 200 Page 1 of 3 �... • • • • pO� 1 ,IT Vide, How stroke y� diagnosed t CI'ck Here Wha[is for d-nner[on'aM� treated /1 Play videw ,iCOM- nature Watch CNN Sites -- myCNN(Video I Audio( Headline News Brief I Free E-mail( Feedback NUUNPAGE CNN Site WORLD Report: Beach closings down, but health U.S. Search U WEATHER problem persists CNN.Cor BUSINESS Aug S Web p 3,2000 PORTS - Web posted at: 12:49 PM EDT(1H49 GMT) TECHNOLOGY - - FitiHj SPACE HEALTH In this;story: NATURE ENTERTAINMENT 'Gastrcentedlis.hepafitis' TOP STORIE POLITICS LAW buddies anal beach bums ( . Judge bans fi — proled sea lip TRAVEL RELATED STORIES,SITES + MOD ` �- Co.bums m _ Down Under ARTS a STYLE Namibia to m BOOKS WASHINGTON(CNN)—Fewer beaches closed due to pollution in 1999, seals NATURE ® but increased monitoring reveals that serious health hazards threaten shore Paws'amtwr IN-DEPTH areas in the United States,environmental experts said Thursday. Victims not v ANALYSIS Timber indus LOCAL The findings were released Thursday in the IOth annual review of the nation's south myCNN beaches by the Natural Resources Defense Council. solar co" Headline Have;brief Hart in Atrira news q.iz The report,called "Testing the Waters," © GRAPHIC (MORE) daily almanac presents"sort of a gray picture," said Elliott Beach Buddies and Bums: Negin,a spokesman for the council. The best and worst of 1999 TOP STORM MULTIMEDIA: Although closings dropped from the previous 0 ALSO Uasn gets re tee, year,that may have been because 1998 was an click here to see how your acdeotarwe' video archive unusually active year for beach shutdowns,due favorite beach rated NAWAILM09 audio to widespread drought and atypical weather Full NRDC report Tasting the Gore close b multimedia showcase conditions caused by EI Nifio. Waters 2000 rann:w matr more senicea Report: Compared to 1997—a more typical year-- down,but he E-MAIL beach closings in 1999 rose 50 percent,with © MESSAGE BOARD persists Subscribe to one of our more than 6,000 reported. Talk about the beach on our (MORE) news a-mail lists. message board `�1'� Emer your addrasic ., 90 However,the increase in beach closings is also BUSINESS a positive sign that more states are closely monitoring their water quality, Negin said. Nasdaq rape Or. Disney 30 br Get a tree e-mail account "The good news is that we're seeing a more comprehensive picture of beach water quality than ever before.But the bad news is that the growing number Discover to s DISCUSSION. .f od.r:enrioe and corm rn:nA:ruro rbar rb.,%e 1—I;nlo(wino Anna n. runoRr http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/08/03/beach.report/index.htmi 08/03/2000 CNN....: Beach closings down, but health problem persists- August 3, 200 Page 2 of 3 .,. .w..a.,.......w,..,,muyu u...... w......w..uw .,.e.Message v cofids prevent closings," he said. chat MARKETS feSdaBGh D f 1£ 'Gastroenteritis, hepatitis' suss ; is CNN WEB SITES. The council warned that polluted waters could contain a variety of disease- E allpo0eloa e.siln- causing organisms, or pathogens. Viruses are most commonly found in contaminated swimming water and can lead to gastroenteritis, hepatitis, AslallosY respiratory illness,and ear,nose and throat problems, according to the report. En EaeeAol SPORT Em PodSvenska al, The report was based on data from the Environmental protection Agency and Norge the council. It included information from 212 communities in the United Pedro feel$a Daamelx States with beaches by oceans,bays.the Great Lakes and some fresh water Duval a;thdp uallaa lakes. International Orlando sore There report also found that water quality in the United States is generally trade for Hill" FASTER ACCESS: p q y g y purooe better than it was 25 years ago. (MDBEI AM 4 All social, At least 70 percent of the beach closings occurred after elevated levels of TIME INC.SITES: bacteria were found in the water.According to the council,the major causes of high bacteria levels are sewage and runoff from polluted rains. GO TO ..—71. WEATHER CNN NETWORKS: The other closings were precautionary. Some were due to what the council E�� nteryyoour U. CW calls"known pollution events," when local beaches decided to close right I- CNJgITERNATioNAL away after learning of sewage treatment plant accidents or sewage pipe Click here to, CMHa9*1elM breaks. Other precautionary closings occurred when local beaches anticipated '4pn0 cities contaminated rainfall. mojc�avnvorks IranB°Q1' Beach buddies and beach bums WORLD SITE INFO: Banrk asks E 11" The annual review included the list of for help with lenient, the council's "Beach Buddies," ..arch beaches the organization commends 1LS. ad IN ►� for adherence to its pollution- laps { .f monitoring and prevention standards. Buah acceoa The Beach Buddies for 1999 include WEB SERVICES: the East Haven Town Beach in East Haven,Connecticut;North Beach and EQlnl Oceanside at the Assateague Island Bush to aree _ ' a National Seashore,Maryland; Revere GOP nomina The beaches on Assateague Island In Beach In Revere,Massachusetts; and Maryland scored high enough to earn a Short Beach in Winthrop, Maine. LAZY "Beach Buddy"commendation from the NRDC The list of Beach Buddies is shorter Death aenalr than in previous years because the council strengthened its judging criteria in on mform I I 1999. TECHNOLOI On the other side are the "Beach Bums," which either have"inadequate monitoring" by the council's standards or fail to close beaches after pollution Judas sets F dlwlasura ' exceeds healthy levels. The Beach Bums for 1999 are the states of Louisiana, Oregon,Texas and Washington. ENTERTAINI The report also contains what Negin called "some bright spots;some beaches Secede rellal http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/08/03/beach.report/index.html 08/03/2000 CNN....: Beach closings down, but health problem persists-August 3, 200 Page 3 of 3 turned around."For example,the state of Mississippi,singled out as a"Beach music extpm Bum"in 1998,closed beaches for the first time in 1999 because of sewage contamination. HEALTH Among the report's recommendations to improve beach quality: U.S.nurse awere •Tighten controls on sources of pollution such as sewage overflows. TRAVEL •Enact federal legislation to make pollution monitoring and enforcement JFK Almon v uniform across the United States. aessencerwi •Require states to adopt the EPA's voluntary action plan for beaches FOOp enacted in 1999. The eorgas c •Allocate part of the revenue earned by beach tourism to monitoring convenuon dl programs. ARTS a STV Royal Acedei RELATED STORIES: students b la Most Miami beaches reopen after sawaae spill Lg(MORE HF June 29,2000 Dirty beach image dogs KM July 3, 2000 EPA says U.S. economy depends on clean water June 9,2000 Clinton unveils initiative to protect U.S, oceans and coasts May 26, 2000 RELATED SITES: Natural Resources Defense Council The United States Environmental Protection Agency Note:Pages will open In a new browser window Exaemel saes are not endorsed by CNN Inaemefim. Search CNN.com v F j l3ack to the too ®20M Cable News Network.All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our puma y guideline hftp://www.cnn,com/2000/NATURE/08/03/beach,report/index.html 08/03/2000 LA Times Page 1 of 3 Inve.st-AnYUUR.SELF -... _ symbol:-9slF :iZ1a+r. UM l Archives I Print EdiUm I Home Dellvery I AdveNse I Site Ma I Feedback i Halo News Business Sports hfp:/Avww.laUmes.cam/news/sdenwienN.N20000805AO00073336.hbnl Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment ClassNieas Sh000ina Back t0 StOry MOLD.movlea.en. Ia4a hsa ly,mliBIRDLn M, I e Saturday,August 5,2000 2 Supervisors: Spend More on Pollution a They want$1.1 million, four times the 1999 amount,to fight water runoff. 6y DAVID REYES.Times slam wMer Alarmed by mounting reports that Orange County rivers,creeks and beaches are fouled by pollutants,two supervisors have endorsed a plan to spend$1.1 million from the general fund, four times what was spent last year,to combat urban runoff and protect sensitive watershed areas. "This is the time to make a major decision," said Supervisor Jim Silva,who is otherwise a fiscal conservative. This week, Silva and Supervisor Tom Wilson,who together represent 409,000 residents living in the county's six coastal cities,took a step to the environmental forefront. "This is our opportunity to truly make an impact in our counts" Wilson said. For decades,coastal cities have home the brunt of pollution,including last year's high bacteria levels that closed a popular stretch of Huntington Beach for two months. But the county is gearing up for a regional attack on water quality, creating a new governmental arm, and taking the unprecedented step of seeking additional funding this year to improve water quality. During 1999, all or parts of one or more county beaches were closed for 231 days to recreational use.At the time,the county spent$250,000 to combat runoff. In addition,the county coastline was cited as among the worst in the state,with 502 postings and closures last year,in a study released Thursday by the Natural Resources Defense Council. The county plan,presented by Vicki L. Wilson,director of the county's huge Public Facilities and Resources Department,was endorsed as a"top strategy" by all five supervisors this week but no funding was allocated. At a retreat on Thursday,Wilson proposed the$1.1-million figure. Strategy for Passage Already in Motion Silva and Wilson expressed confidence that they can persuade the board's other members to vote for the funds later this year. Part of the strategy is already in motion: a new office,the Watershed and Coastal Resources Division,within public works,to handle urban runoff as a regional rather than coastal or city issue. The new division,headed by Larry Paul,who formerly was manager of coastal facilities,will include a 24-person staff. Coastal facilities includes piers and buildings on beaches,but not the water itself. The new emphasis is part of an overall five-year environmental plan that could cost nearly$72 million from county, state and federal sources. httpJ/www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 3 "Urban runoff is a result of the effects of urban development," said Vicki Wilson. "What we have to do . . . involves changing behavior. We have to get people to change the way they do things, like washing their cars in driveways, dumping used motor oil down storm drains,over-irrigation and . . . . pesticide use in agriculture." Neither she nor the supervisors talked about requiring new developments in the county to completely divert runoff away from the ocean, as other counties and cities have proposed. Some of the strategies being talked about include reaching the public at an early age,with instruction on the causes and hazards of ocean pollution. In addition, the new division's staff will link with the business community to explain the economic disadvantages of having dirty ocean water. With the state's regulatory agencies cracking down,the county is attempting to launch its plans now rather than wait and be subjected to stiff fines. Recent Fines Were the First in Years Recently,the state Regional Water Quality Board based in San Diego fined Laguna Beach$60,000 for eight sewage spills that closed beaches over an 18- month period. It is the first time in years that the regional board has imposed fines on an Orange County city for sewage spills. The water board is considering several more actions against Orange County agencies,including expanding a"cleanup and abatement" order against potential polluters,such as cities that drain into Aliso Creek in South County. A recent Aliso Creek study found elevated bacteria counts,unstable aquatic life and high water temperatures downstream from development,which may contribute to a decline in plant life and animal species. Part of the county's funding could be used to develop a scientific technique for "source tracking,"which could pinpoint whether bacteria is caused by animals or humans through DNA tests and other means. The county Health Care Agency's laboratories have estimated that it may take three years to develop a suitable test. « « « "We're in the same situation we were in 10 to 15 years ago with the [federal] Clean Air Act. This is just the start for urban runoff," said Vicki Wilson. The hard part will be modifying the public's behavior and attitudes. On the way to a recent meeting,Silva said he saw a gardener with a leaf- blowing machine near an intersection. "I don't think people look at that as a direct connection to our beach pollution,but it is," said Silva, noting that the machines blow gasoline-laden dust and other pollutants into storm drains. Some cities have curbed leaf blowers because of noise pollution,but Silva said they may need to crack down even more. Supervisor Cynthia P. Coad said she is also a believer in cleaner streets. Last spring she pushed to start cleaning residential streets in the county's unincorporated areas at a cost of$474,237. In one month of street sweeping in the North Tustin area, Coad said 60 tons of debris were collected—' everything from dead opossums to Coca-Cola bottles." Coad said she is inclined to favor the$1.1-million figure in combating runoff. "It's essential to the economy of our county to have clean beaches." Focus on Runoff Urban runoff that pollutes the county's beaches will no longer take a back seat under a plan to spend$1.1 million in county funds to combat pollution. In addition, a new county section,Watershed and Coastal Resources Division,was created to improve water quality in the county's 13 watershed areas that http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/07/2000 LA Times Page 3 of 3 eventually drain into the Pacific Ocean. Copydght 2000 Las Angels nmes Guaranteed Lowest Hotel Rates! Try Us First! http://www.latimes.conVcgi-bin/print.egi 08/07/2000 Noses out ofjoint over compost Page I of 5 How low can we go? VISA aaaar; Home I ArdnVes I PHnt Edison I Hgmg Delivery I Advertise I Site Maap i Fee back I hh.. News Business Sports Tuesday,July 25,2000 Politics Travel Commentary News from Chino in the Times Community Newspapers _Entertainment Classifieds Shopping Music,My .@,an, L,homes tars W.reseumnta rantaln Noses out of joint over compost ■Chino Hills residents unhappy with proposal to relocate facilty near city line. TOP STORIES By DAVID HERMANN • Noses out of joint over compost • Closings continue in murder trial • Sur_p_Lical procedure eases decision to donate CHINO--It takes in some 200,000 tons of kidny manure and sludge each year from local dairies MORE and sewage treatment plants. Communln Redtope Oralke So when folks in neighboring Chino Hills got Papers Guide court wind that officials here and at the Inland Empire News by area Home Prices s_F_VaMay Utilities Agency were thinking about moving a School Profiles Ventura 97-acre compost facility to a site near their border, Rentals County they began to raise a stink of their own. Community Resources "The current facility is rows and rows and rows of manure and sludge," says Chino Hills resident Find the address, phone number,web site or email Bob Purcell. "It's ugly. It's gross. It smells." address for places you need to know. Purcell and several other Chino Hills residents Chambers or Places of worship have been attending agency meetings to voice Commerce Post Offices their opposition to the relocation of the agency's Dept or Motor vehicles School Locations Co-Composting Facility, mixes wood chips Hospitals Shen(fs P g, Y P Libraries Volunteer Opportunities and other materials with sewage and manure to Palos transform it into a soil additive. Classifieds Find a home,car,renlal,jo_b me5 me_mhandise Chino Hills officials share Purcell's distaste at auction,bout plane or av Place an Ad the potential construction of a new composting facility on the comer of Kimball Avenue and El Print Edition Advertisements See this week's ads Prado Road within a quarter mile of a planned residential development and a new multimillion- OTHER EDITIONS dollar city-owned sports park. Print Edition,orange Cou".vailey.menturA-County, To prevent that,Chino Hills City Manager National,Communt Papers Doug La Belle said, he sent a letter to the agency tdrna=msmrg this month asking them to slow the planning Books Columnists crossword process for the project. Food Educationl_+orosoWe "We're just saying, 'Let's take a step back and Health Science s Luau look at this thin on an incremental basis.'It Real ar 1 Special Weather g Real ESWte Special Reports WeaNer appears that they're trying to move the project So Cal Living Times Pon oisassions forward on a very short time frame," La Belle Sunday pinion Rescind- d_yby SITE MAP said. "We've got significant concerns about the SHOP'TIL YOUR LAPTOP DROPS potential impact of this facility on Chino Hills, on seams our businesses and our residents." sryo ngon La Belle said the relocation of the composting NfMes ami F—Ko facility could threaten investments that the city r Product. r stores has made in several projects. "We are talking about$30 [million) to $40 http://www.latimes.com/communities/news/pomona_valley/20000725/tiV0007151.html 07/26/2000 Noses out of joint over compost rage a ui i million in revenues that we are at risk of not receiving," he said,noting that the city will spend v�s..xe - f between$10 million and$12 million on the Big Ann& League Dreams Sports Park alone. LaBelle said that the new site could affect residents. "The proposed relocation site is within 1/4 mile of 3,000 Chino Hills residents and within a mile of almost 7,000 residents," he said. The site is adjacent to a planned major commercial area at Canyon Parkway and the 71 Freeway,he said. Richard Atwater,the Inland Empire Utility Agency's general manager, says the composting facility's current site, in the 8100 block of Chino Corona Road across from the California Institution for Women,is no longer ideal because of plans for future residential development in the area. Atwater said the agency will consider several potential sites over the next year,but he added that he believes the Kimball/El Prado location is the most logical choice because it would place the composting facility next to the agency's new$85 million sewage treatment plant. "Why not have a campus that's both a sewage treatment plant and a composting facility all in one,"he said. "Besides,the City of Chino told us that was their preferred site,and since they're the host city,we listened." Chino City Manager Glen Rojas says he understands the concerns of his neighbors in Chino Hills,but believes that they need to accept their share of a regional waste burden. "It's a regional issue,not a Chino issue," Rojas said. "This plant is Ontario.It's Chino Hills. It's all the areas that the Inland Empire Utilities Agency serves." As for the facility's effect on Chino Hills residents,Rojas said current facility is much closer to planned homes than the 1/4-mile distance from the Mmball/EI Prado site that worries Chino Hills officials. "We're talking about 30 feet from a planned residential development--across the street,"he said. "We want to locate it in an industrial development where a sewage plant already exists. It's not like we're taking it and putting it in another neighborhood." Besides,both Rojas and Atwater say,they want the new composting facility to be enclosed, unlike the current open composting operation, a move Atwater estimated would eliminate 99%of the odor, dust and air emissions. But building an enclosed composting facility that can handle the volume of waste generated by the nearly 650,000 people and several hundred http://www.latiznes.com/communities/news/Pomona_valley/20000725/tiv000715 Lhtml 07/26/2000 Noses out of joint over compost rage J 01 a thousand cows that live in the area served by the agency will cost a lot of money. The agency has applied for a$50 million state grant to help pay for the project,an application that received support in the form of letters from surrounding cities and local officials. Atwater hopes to hear by September whether the agency got the grant. But officials in Chino Hills are so opposed to the Kimball/El Prado site that they are contemplating rescinding their letter in support of the grant.They will discuss rescinding the letter at tonight's meeting. "That certainly may be part of what we take to council and recommend that they do,"La Belle said,adding that$50 million is a drop in the bucket compared to the$200 million to$300 million that an enclosed facility could cost the agency. The agency,Atwater said,would like to model its new enclosed facility on the existing Rancho Las Virgenes Composting Facility in Calabasas near Malibu,where the high-priced homes that abut the facility are tonier than anything found in Inland Valley communities. "If you can build it in Malibu,you can certainly build it in Chino,"he said. Countered Chino Hills councilwoman Gwerm Norton-Pent': "Who's got the ocean breezes—we don't.We've got stagnant air and some of the worst air pollution in Southern California." The spokeswoman for the Las Virgenes Water District,which operates the Las Virgenes facility, also said that its presence has not chilled development in the area,noting that homes in a development across the street are selling for about $500,000 and homes priced at more than$1 million are being built within a mile radius. But the$50 million Las Virgenes facility does differ from a potential Chino facility. It does not process dairy manure,serves only about 90,000 people and its 15-acre site is a far cry from the 90-plus acres upon which Atwater hopes to build. The Las Virgenes facility has also experienced some problems with odor,particularly when a special filter failed last fall,earlier than its three- to five-year lifespan. Buehring said it took facility stall about three months to figure out the problem,replace the filter and return things to normal. "When things are working properly,you shouldn't smell anything," he said. Both Buehring and Atwater said composting facilities make better sense than trucking the waste to a landfill. "Why would you take biosolids and dairy http://www.latimes.com/communities/news/pomona_valley/20000725/tiv000715"tml 07/26/2000 Noses out of joint over compost Page 4 of 5 manure and truck it off to landfill in Arizona when we've got plenty of beneficial uses for it here?" Atwater asked. "If you go to Home Depot and buy a bag of compost,what do you think you are getting?It's the same thing that we're producing here." Atwater said by processing the sludge locally instead of shipping it away,utility rate payers are saving about 20 cents per month on their sewer bill. "If we didn't treat our sewage biosolids here,it would cost us another$500,000 to$600,000 per year to truck it to Riverside or up to Kern County like Los Angeles and Orange counties are doing," he said. Atwater said those costs are increasing as landfills become full and places like Kern County begin refusing to accept waste from outside their areas. "We also think what we're doing environmentally is the right thing,"he said. "To me its a slam dunk." But Norton-Perry said taxpayers should not be paying for an operation that she believes is losing money. "The composting facility as it exists right now is operating at a loss," she said. "Why is it even necessary at this point to subsidize it?" She says the bottom line is that if the agency wants to continue operating the facility,it needs to find another location. Chino resident Purcell agreed. "We want to be a good neighbor and support this," he said. "It needs to be done. But should it be done in our back yard?I think not." The agency is planning to hold a number of meetings to inform the public about the composting facility in the coming months. For information: 357-0241 Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. RELATED STORIES 4 News Business Sports Polities Travel Com ntaN Copyright 2000 Los Angeles TMes Entertainment ClassRieds Shopping hiki%hhm sesx P(. ie� renlas hup://www.latimes.conVeommunitiestnews/pomona_valley/20000725/tiv0007151.html 07/20/2000 Kern fights for sludge ordinance Page 1 of 3 SD<ak Om: ,�� ._ • A Li 1 A r, Questton �.fine-weetc� news Or T3akrisfirl0 Cdrfanuan .no,,,e Kern fights for sludge ordinance Filed: 0810712000 By CHRISTINE BEDELL Californian staff writer e-mail: cbedell@bakersfleld.com SANTA CLARITA — Kern County marched into enemy territory Tuesday to defend its right —and stress the state's obligation —to strictly regulate the farmland spreading of sludge. Kern residents, scientists and government attorneys made their case before representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board. The board, on Aug. 17, will vote on new statewide sludge- use requirements that would affect Kern County if its sludge ordinance dies in court. As promised, members of the Kern contingent challenged the adequacy of the proposed rules and of the science on which they were based. They also sought more explicit assurances that sludge managers would have to follow local rules. "Kern County should be free to Implement regulations stricter than other (governments')," said Tom Haslebacher, a Kern County Water Agency geologist. The heads of several Southern California agencies that truck sludge to Kern County couldn't have disagreed more with the criticisms. They applauded most of the suggestions and called their http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i-1246956683.asp 08/02/2000 Kern fights for sludge ordinance Page 2 of 3 environmental review "reasonable and "defensible." "it sets the pace for reasonable regulation set on sound science, not speculation," said Donald Rebeck of the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works. Sewage sludge, or blosollds, is a mix of treated human and Industrial waste used as fertilizer on non-edible crops. Class A Is cooked to remove all pathogens and Is safe for household use; Class B contains some pathogens after processing. Kern County recently banned the land application of all but Class A blosolids effective 2003 to protect the environment. Six waste agencies, Including the County Sanitation District of Los Angeles County, have sued to set aside the ordinance until It Is studied in an environmental Impact report. The state, meanwhile, wants to streamline and strengthen Its biosolids regulations through new"general waste discharge requirements." They would, among other things, ban sludge use on some saturated or eroding lands, mandate more soil and groundwater testing and constrain sludge storage and transportation. The proposed state blosolids rules would be stricter than the federal government's, but more lax than Kern County's. The three-hour workshop, Initially scheduled for Bakersfield, was held In the Los Angeles County city of Santa Clarita. More than 60 people, including one State Water Resources board member, Peter Silva, attended. About half spoke. Several Antelope Valley residents and officials joined a Kern County call for more study of sludge's potential health Impacts based on new government and medical reports. "It's amazing to me people would even consider spreading this," said resident Virginia Stout, who has been reading up on sludge. http://www.bakersfield.com/top/1-1 2469566 8 3.asp 08/02/2000 Kem fights for sludge ordinance Page 3 of 3 There's no reason for alarm as long as sludge handlers play by the rules, countered Jon Coffin, president of Responsible Biosolids Management, Inc., another group suing Kern County. He charged that Kern's sludge ordinance is the result of "wealthy growers' using their"wiles and political might." Kem County officials had complained about the meeting's move. Silva explained what happened at the workshop's start: We wanted as neutral a location as we could." beck bxk to top home Cop nghDH 2O00,The Bakersfield Celgomian I Email the Webmaetw Assooale"Press Coovnoht Notice I Pdoe Pdim Statement http://www.bakersfield,com/top/i--124695M83.asp _ 08/02/2000 "0°1O°""""° SSPItTAIi�i sO.SOX lror P.O.90%912W �� & SRCIU(91rro.9-1 91209Ue]1 Se W VBag FbYntt (91913142W1 E9� �t11D'�OTlit2t P$iS�11LC FN((918)3142f)1 IM9Nv an9Cwmnatm v OMMUCT OFFlCEa MWOM BILL CAMPBELL 1910ECA °'02 2065 tags MOPrel Cmmi9bn ASSEMSLTIMN,SE9ENf VuFT O15T Cr (71<)999dB80 FN(pt11998-]102 E#latl: NeemONmen.CunWe99mamEM.n.9a' 1-090-09Pea99 August 8,2000 The Honorable Chairman Baggett State Water Resources Control Board 901 "IF,Street Sacramento,CA 95814 Subject: SWRCB Final Environmental Impact Report and General Order Covering General Waste Discharge Requirements for Biosolids Dear Chairman Baggett and Members of the Board: Recycling of our waster streams and diverting reusable material from our landfills has become a high priority for every city and county in the State and is reflected in State Caw mandating recycling and diversion from landfills. Biosolids can be recycled from our wastewater treatment plants to provide valuable nutrients and soil conditioners to our agricultural lands. Although some biosolids can be reused in urban areas for landscaping and horticulture,maximizing such reuse requires a statewide approach to achieve success. I therefore support the certification of the statewide Final Environmental Impact Report and adoption of the General Order Covering General Waste Discharge Requirements for Biosolids Land Application. The SWRCB has developed a reasonable regulation for the land application of biosolids in an environmentally safe manner. The General Order is a product of years of thorough research that have resulted in uniform requirements for biosolids recycling in California that are protective of both public health and the environment. Biosolids reuse has been shown to be a positive environmental practice that is strongly encouraged by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and many environmental groups. The State has been in a holding pattern regarding issuance of any permits that are needed to establish land application sites while the Environmental Impact Report has been prepared under your auspices. I urge that you complete this process and adopt the General Order in the most expeditious manner possible. SincerelDy,/ BU L CAMPB51 '� Assemblyman,71st District C: .Mary Jane Forster, SWRCB Board Member John W.Brown,SWRCB Bond Member Peter S. Silva,SWRCB Board Member Blake P.Anderson,OC Sanitation District Layne Baroldi,OC Sanitation District High-stakes war Page 1 of 2 I ly v_ �vr t=4i High-stakes war over sludge ' Cities, farmers spar over destination of sewage-treatment byproduct Ventura County Star-7/27/00 Commentary by John Knit,assistant editor,opinion page Each day,a parade of trucks heads north out of the Southern California metropolis, grinding up the long grade over the Tehachapis and descending into Kem County,one of the state's premier agricultural regions.The convoy is nearly a mirror image of the truck traffic heading the other way laden with commodities grown in the fertile Central Valley. There's an important difference,however. Whereas the southbound trucks bear loads of oranges, tomatoes, almonds,carrots,cotton and other valued products to urban markets,the northbound trucks haul a less popular cargo: sewage sludge,the semisolid leftover from municipal wastewater treatment. This aesthetically unsavory commodity is a headache for sanitation districts forced to dispose of it. Yet to farmers trying to coax crops from marginal land, it is nutrient-rich resource. And now it is at the heart of a legal battle that pits science against popular perception, and the state's rural heartbeat against urban muscle. Technically, "sludge" refers to organic solids separated from untreated wastewater. The stuff being trucked to Kern County from cities throughout Southern California(including several in Ventura County) is known as "biosolids" --human and industrial waste that has been filtered from treated wastewater,pumped into tanks and allowed to cook in its own biologically generated heat until bacteria and other pathogens have been neutralized. For decades,sewage plants dumped their sludge in the ocean, buried it in landfills or incinerated it. But regulatory barriers to ocean disposal and burning have made those options unattractive. And high tipping fees at crowded landfills near urban areas have made burying it too costly. Searching for a new solution, municipal sanitation districts have seized on a paradoxically old technique. Essentially, properly treated biosolids are a fertilizer and an organic soil amendment, and plowing such waste into cropland has long been known to boost its fertility. Alittle over five years ago, Oxnard bought its own 1,280-acre Kem County farm,to which it sends 75 to 80 tons of sludge each day. Other Southern California sanitation districts have had little trouble finding receptive farmers of their own. A billion pounds of sludge a year,more than 50 truckloads a day, makes its way to Kern County where it is spread on land used for such nonfood crops as cotton, sorghum and alfalfa. Thanks to its proximity to Southern California's major urban centers, Kem County has quietly become California's top repository of sludge. Not everyone in Kem County is happy about that. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/7-27_high_stakes_war.htm 07/28/2000 High-stakes war Page 2 of 2 Local environmentalists and health activists warn that sludge may contain high levels of toxic metals derived from industrial processes, as well as viruses,parasites and other pathogenic organisms that survive processing. The limited research that has been done,however,suggests there is little public-health risk. Heavy-metal concentrations in municipal wastewater have been greatly reduced since the 1970s under tough federal and state discharge regulations. A 1996 report by the National Research Council noted, "There have been no reported outbreaks of infectious diseases associated with a population's exposure--either directly or through food consumption pathways—to adequately treated and properly distributed reclaimed water or sludge applied to agricultural land." If the actual threat to public health is ambiguous,the effect on public perception is not. "We don't want to be L.A.'s toilet," one Kern County farmer told a reporter earlier this year. Sensitive about the public image of Kern County agricultural products—particularly high- value specialty crops competing in a crowded market—a coalition of growers persuaded the Kern County Board of Supervisors in October to pass an ordinance malting it illegal to apply conventional sludge to farmland.The sewage agencies responded with a lawsuit in November,contending that Kern County violated the California Environmental Quality Act by failing to review the environmental impact of its sludge ban before adopting it.The trial is pending. Ventura County agencies are not parties to the suit,but will be affected by its outcome. If the ban is allowed to stand,it will increase disposal costs for every city that sends its sludge to Kern County,while also depriving farmers of a cheap source of crop nutrients. I http•J/204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articlesr7-27_high_stakes_wu.htm 07/28/2000 Public's Interest Page 1 of 3 °f rra l t r., e:. Public's interest can't be ignored in water sell-offs Fresno Bee-8/3/00 Commentary by Lloyd Carter, President of the California Save Our Streams Council Forgotten is who owns the water in the first place. The public dispenses this water free through permits issued by the state Water Resources Control Board. After 130 years of Increasingly intensified irrigation in the San Joaquin Valley, resulting in a cornucopia of food and fiber unequaled in human history, it now appears the most lucrative cash crop may be the Irrigation water Itself. Irrigation districts on both sides of the Valley are now contemplating what was unthinkable 10 years ago -- selling water to Southern California Instead of using It for crops. The troubling question raised is whether the public directly benefits from profits off the liquid gold falling on the Sierra every winter in the form of a snowpack. Public water that the public, through Its trustees, gives away. While the 20th century was dominated by Valley agriculture's demand for more publicly funded water storage, a more realistic assessment indicates that oversupply-- of everything from grapes and raisins to cotton, tomatoes and almonds-- has been the principal problem, not water shortages. West-side cotton farmers have been struggling with rising production costs, Ineffective drainage practices, reduced yields and depressed markets. It now takes $750 worth of retail water to grow $150 worth of wholesale cotton. Tomato growers have also fallen on hard times. Raisin and almond formers have suffered low prices from surpluses. The result Is that small farmers keep disappearing and the big operators, strong enough to ride out the low spots, get bigger. The Westlands Water District of western Fresno and Kings counties recently proposed a water exchange with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in which It will get back more water than it gives plus a very large chunk of cash. Metropolitan is a water wholesaling agency that in turn sells Its supply to local water supply districts servicing millions of Southlanders, The Westlands will exchange, over 30 years, 600,000 acre-feet of its supply in http://204.212.225,138/socalh2onews/articles/8-3_public's_interest.htm 08/04/2060 Public's Interest Page 2 of 3 drought years for 660,000 acre-feet from Metropolitan in normal years. In addition, the Westiands will be paid a whopping $98.7 million over 30 years simply for making its drought year water available. A nice middleman profit. No surprise, growers on the east side, in the Fdant Water Users Authority, comprised of smaller irrigation districts stretching from Madera to Kern counties have also announced they are interested in talking to Metropolitan about selling water. And of course Azurbc, a subsidiary of the Houston-based energy company, Enron, wants to begin groundwater banking in Madera County and sell the storage of the public's river water to the highest bidder. Forgotten in this speculative fever is who owns the water in the first place. The public dispenses this water free through permits issued by the state Water Resources Control Board. The water board now permits the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to divert for irrigation over 7 million-acre feet of water a year.That is enough to meet the domestic needs of 35 million new Californians. The federal Bureau of Reclamation's dam and canals known as the Central Valley Project, stretches from Shasta Dam to Bakersfield. The bureau sells its free water to irrigation districts throughout Central Califomia, which, in turn, sell it to small farmers and large corporate agribusinesses alike. The primary motivation for the water board in giving the free water to the Reclamation Bureau 40 to 60 years ago was to bring and lands Into production and promote family farming. But times change. It is difficult to defend using public water to grow cotton costing 80 cents a pound to produce but selling at 50 to 60 cents a pound. The U.S. government response to frequent surpluses of all crops is subsidy payments totaling many billions of dollars a year nationwide. Moreover, the environmental damage of such intensive agriculture on 4 million acres of land in the Valley has been undeniable. Virtually every river In the Valley is heavily diverted to meet agricultural demands. The San Joaquin River is dry for 50 miles on the Valley floor and is Tittle more than an agricultural sewer downstream of Merced County. The Delta continues its decline of fisheries and water quality. Delta farmers complain about poor quality irrigation water from the river. Indeed, concerns about Delta drinking water quality are what prompted Metropolitan to seek the Sierra snow melt. Let us hope that the state water board, which has neglected Its public trust duties for decades while trying to meet all the needs of agribusiness will finally take steps to restore and protect public trust interests in the rivers- http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/8-3-public's_intered.htm 08/04/2000 Public's interest Page 3 of 3 ranging from groundwater recharge for riparian farmers to fisheries and recreation — before the rivers are sold off. These public trust resources remain unprotected in the Valley and Delta. The board, as the public's trustee, should also consider—at public hearings—whether at least a portion of the big profits created by the pending sell-off of the rivers should revert back to the public that gave it away. http://204.212.225.138/socalh2onews/articles/8-3_public's_interest.htm 08/04/2060 CNN.com -Texas drought order: Don't flush -August 1, 2000 Page 1 of 3 Texas drought order: Don't flush Towns rush to keep water flowing before it runs out �- August 1,2000 Web posted at: 12:33 p.m.EDT(1636 GMT) In Nls story: Desperate situation' V_atuntee s Wild emergency backup,pipeline RELATED STORIES,SUES 4 ELECTRA,Texas(CNN)--You know the drought is bad when watering your lawn can bring a fine of up to$500. But that's not the worst of it in Electra,a small North Texas Images of the drought in Electra.Texas, town where the local lake is drying up where the water supply is down to its last and the water supply is down to its 05 days last 45 days. To conserve what little water is left,people here are being asked to use thew toilets five times before Bushing. "We've had to ration before, but nothing this drastic," says Joe Youree,a resident of Electra, 145 miles northwest of Dallas. With the Texas drought in its third year,nearly 200 communities,both urban and mral,have imposed water restrictions. Some have issued outdoor bum bans,and the Guadalupe River is being patrolled to make sure none of its water is illegally siphoned off. Counties covering three-quarters of the state 0 VIDEO were declared disaster areas by Gov.George CNN's Charles W. Bush,who last week asked for federal help Zewe looks at the in fighting wildfires. dry conditions and their consequences - 'Desperate situation' eu,r Video (QuickTime, Real or Windows Media) Residents of Electra are limited to 1,000 gallons of water per person,per month.The Q Drought tips average American uses more than half that Click here for lips to r— every month just flushing the toilet. helpynt,get �-' through the tlrought of 2000 "We're in a desperate situation here," says Glen Branch,the water commissioner of Electra,a town of 3,000 in Wichita County. "Watering . ...... http://www.cnn.com/2000/WEATHER/08/01/drought.01/index.himl OB/Ol/2000 CNN.com -Texas drought order: Don't flush - August 1, 2000 Page 2 of 3 your lawn,watering your Flower beds is kind of Gg Auvly like committing murder," he told CNN. Electra,Texas, Weser Commissioner Glen Facing the threat it will run out of water, Branch says the Electra hopes to Complete a wafer purification water shortage has taught the system that will allow the reopening of 10 townspeople a lesson wells shut down a decade ago because of 84K/08 sec. contamination. AIFF or WAV sound enC Bohn Warden of the Volunteers build emergency y Taxes Natural backup pipeline Resource Conservation Committee says Texas is in a To the south, in equally water-threatened 'critical water supply state' Throckmorton, work is nearing completion on a 21-mile pipeline to the neighboring 135K/12 sec. community of Graham, which has agreed to AIEE or WAV sound provide an emergency backup water supply. Tom Mihvee, chairman of Texas An $800,000 state grant is being used to pay Emergency for the pipeline,which is being built b an Management,says P Pe g Y being'100 days out'from a army of volunteers working at times in 100- loss of water is a serious degree-plus temperatures as they dig a 4-foot- situation deep trench. 1 D4K/O9 sec. Don Peck,68,is one of the many volunteers AIFE or WAV sound who have come forward to help Throckmorton with its water problems. © CNN WEATHER FORECASTS "It's a chance to help other people when you Electra.7x know they really need it," says Peck,a retired Dallas.7x chemical engineer who drove 260 miles from Longview,Texas, to lend his expertise to the Throckmorton Tx project. "Without water, you can't do much of anything." © MESSAGE BOARD Nature's wrath Those who live in Throckmorton know that well.Many residents began buying water from other sources and hauling it to their homes months ago.Others have had to sell off or keep moving their cattle because there just isn't enough water or green pasture to keep the livestock healthy. "People in the city turn on their faucet and the water works and they take it for granted," says Throckmorton resident Byron Parrott. "We have families out here using the same water to take baths in." That kind of lesson is being learned in Electra,too--by the water commissioner. "I thought many a times, 'How could I be so dumb that there will always be water,"'Branch says. "But,you know,a situation like this is what wakes people up." CNN Correspondent Charles Zewe and The Associated Press contributed to this http://www.cnn.com/2000/WEATHER/08/O1/drought.01/Index.html 08/01/2000 Date: July 28,2000 Orange County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints PLANT NO. 1 2000 a n $ B $ Nov Dec Jan a'aa Feb Mar Apr May Jun a Jul Augn E Se 3a a Oct 11/15 no 12/11 vesl 1/6 no 3/21 no 5/18 no 620 eS 1225 no 3121 no plant related Total: 0 1 0 o 0 0 0 1 PLANT N0.2 2000 Nov Dec If Jan Feb a$ Mar IV' Ator 11 ill Jun 11 Jul a I AugIV Se 'a'a Oct a 11/13 no 1277 no 2/3 no 314 yts 4/20 no 5/3 yes 6/13 yes 724 no 12113 no 2/10 yes 3/17 0o 4/27 es 5/27 es 6113 Yes 721 yesl 122g no 2/13 e5 4/29 no M 17/31es as 2/19 no plant related 2/20 n0 Total: 0 0 0 2 1 i 2 Colleetlon Systems 2000 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr may Jun Jul AugSep Oct 11/5 12/14 1/3 218 3/2 4/13 52 6/9 11/9 1223 1/3 2/15 316 4114 5/12 6/19 Tim 5 1228 1/6 2/28 3/15 4/18 5/15 6/21 11/15 a12/281/104126 5/18 6/2211/15125 4/28 5/23 62811/151/27 5/25 6/30 5/30Coll.: Total 7 Total 6 Total 3 Total 3 Total 5 Total 7 Total 6 Total Total Tolel Total RJO:YSH:cf:ll This spreadsheet does not include in-house odor complaints g:\excel.dta\om\Odor Complaint Log.xls VZ-4100 $oPR9 Lx �refZ — a�MT PC'!4� NCT� TI+cS HOn^< Owr-aC-2`� pSSOCrr1y-toN fDK9'+�-S Oduw PwguC INF,A4SM�[,smt2 LryyeSSl d^fsl sVa JG,.,A, i Aoi N.Artrls+Indra�aC tsSwFS --AAAi V'ulume J. Nu-2 I Iu nu nenm Beach,CA Summer 20M H.B. Council rejects advisory board proposals to prepare for rebuilding city infrastructure The Infrastructure Advisory Commil- lee a (IAC) proposal to put controls on the pation by two of our members in an advt- use of future infrastructure funds was re- sory committee to"guide implementation of Jetted by a 5-2 vote at a special meeting of _ a communioywide public awareness pro- the City Council on June 9. gram that focuses attention on the commit. Only Council members Dettloff and nily's tumor and future infrastructure Green, the liaisons to the IAC, voted in fa- ^nods." SEHBNA complied with the re- vor of the charter amendment. Council quest.The IAC was established by the cur- members Harmon. Julien. Sullivan. Bauer rent City Council in March 1998. and Mayor Garofalo voted against the The IAC is made up of 56 primary and civic measure. alternate representatives of civic organiu- In debating the reasonable«commends- Lions throughout the city,including the two Lions of the IAC, members opposed to the members from SEHBNA. The IAC has amendment made it clear that they were - been meeting monthly(and frequently room opposed to putting any kind of controls on _ �t- often)tu evaluate the miliuwnure problem their spending power. They essentially ig- + r :r and to humanism recommendations to the noted the opinions of the members of the ,�'r ¢ City Council. many ciumns' groups represented on the x JL.�'' 7T< March 26, 1998. mission statement IAC e � provided to the IAC stated that the IAC Anyone who has read newspapers in the y. i :'9I would review the projects and the funding T laze year arognius that the City of Hunt- shortfall and"make recommendations to the ty Lagoon Beach is facing serious infrasunclu e _ pros Council regarding the optimum ap- problems because of under-funding. roach for financing the most critical and long term infrastructure needs of the com- Infraswaure includes storm drains, on ity."The City Council has now decided sewers, roads, sidewalks, parks. beach fa- After decades of neglect and make-do the JAC's recommendations to start to cilities. public buildings, nrcctlights, trees, asphalt patching, the city is finally re- "guide implementation" through an initial playgrounds, block walls along streets, and the many other essential physical elements placing some of the 3Eyearold side- rep of an"optimum approach",the reston- that keep the city running and property val- walks in SEHBNA's area. Most of the mso of taxpayers confidence in the council ues up. Over the past four decades, rapid eity's infrastructure is in woeful shape. to spend new money only on infrasmuuure. growth in Huntington Beach expanded the Is unwarremed and cannot be approved. infnsuueture. Many of those infrastructure I many discussions that have taken components are now teaching the end of Beach la in due aced oft i g su maintenance placee within the IAC. one critical issue or replacement and that s going to cost keeps coming up: How can the City con- their economically maintainable life, which smw verybig bucks. The most recent esli- means it costs much more to maintain them g vtnno the taxpayers the money raised for now than when they were new. mete to an over the shortfall it avail- infrastructure will not s used for other d to able funds over the neat 20 years t^ tom- poses?In separate focus groups convened re Over the years no one has snood up or lete forecast ro eels. You ma ask,who's City Council meetings to support spending p p J Y assess public reactions to infrastructure money on maintenance and replacement of going to pay for that shortfall? Sthe l guess problems. the same issue came up.The sty who'. For the most pan,it's you the.a(halls hals Imton recommendedas tostart with the IAC n the City infrastructure There has been no special in citizens of Huntington Beach, rhos s interest group pushing an infrastructure h g Council City was to slat wish : amendment m agenda who. the City Chatter that would: Now the time has come to pay the piper. In November SEHBNA then-Mayor Ralph Bauer wrote to SEHBNA requesting parties- tGmimrd rot fwae 2) Much of the in(rastructurc in Huntington Page 2 Pelican Pete asks, (Urban runoff or urban runaround?' by Pete the Pelican number of weeks and much was written M'(us told to Pauline Bent) " about the problem in the local papers. But After the Huntington Beach oil spill of t�. what are people doing about it?(Birds and 1990. 1 thought all our troubles would be animals must depend on people to preserve over--that our lives would get back to nor- habitats.)You, the people! Are you closing mal and we would continue enjoying good your minds and think someone else will do healthy lives.Thankfully,the Talbert Marsh it for you? Who will that someone be: the was saved by the quick thinking of the many Huntington Beach merchants?Last summer people that care about the quality of the wa- their losses seemed to take precedence over ter and bird habitats.Here at the PCH bridge the more crucial problem. Or perhaps you where the Santa Ana River meets the Pacific think it's up to the mayor,or the City Coun- Ocean,a dam was built to keep the oil from 'V it l t cil.or the Board of Supervisors,Who? creeping into the wetland. ������ i \�'. I will let my secretary finish the rest of My name is Pete. I am a California `• ``\is,, this letter,I've gotta go see what's going on brown pelican and I live near river jetties \ at the pier! along with other sea friends -- avocets. Thanks.Pale!Okay,my name is Pauline Cltkills ro osal Bent. I'm a SEHBNA member from the Y p P Green Area. 1 have been walking on the for infrastructure river trail for 21 years (My husband Jetty joined me 4 years ago). That is where we met John Scott and Lola. His concern about IC the quality of life in our area prompted him • Establish a separately accountable infra. to organize SEHBHA and this newsletter structure fund for any moneys raised for that informs us about stuff that's important infrastructure purposes; egrets, great blue herons. hawks as well as to our community. • Require the City Council to continue to other animals -- rabbits, lizards and squir- Pete the pelican has made his point. We spend the same amount that is now spent rels. am facing another summer and the bacteria from the general fund for infrastructure On Feb.9. 1990 1 wrote a letter to editor count at the beach has not been connected. (about IS percent of the general fund of the L A Times stating my concern about In a recent edition of The Wave, Mayor Go- the oil spill but it was never published. It rofalo says. "It is important to remember budget or about $30,000.000 this year was my intent to describe the oil spill team that the citys beaches were never closed including salaries, materials and con- our perspective,"words from the birds'and last year." He goes on to say that for those tracts) so that new funds raised would other animals that make their homes in and wishing to play volley ball, use the bike not be used to supplant funds currently around the river jetties in Huntington trails,share a meal around the fire rings,the being spent;and Beach. beach has always been open. • Establish a council-appointed citizens' Now I see a more serious concern, a Pete returns from the pier and reports,"I oversight committee to make sure funds continuing danger to the to the ecology of Row over the beach I saw no surfers riding raised far infrastructure are spent wisely. the area, for birds and humans alike. The the waves, no body boarders, no sand cas- The infrastructure problem still exists in buzz phrase is"urban runoff."Last summer tles in prueress. no kids chasing each other spite of the City Council's refusal to slant the beach was closed to water sports for a in the v;ee, Allis silent" addressing the problem with action instead of words. At some paint in the future, this We, the people, in order to form a more perfect city or some other City Council will be asking P p you, the voters. to support raising funds through to axes additional t pay for needed infrastructuremaintenance taxes and replace- ments.In the absence of the type of controls Neighbors "'�'�' � recommended by the IAS it is doubtful Neighbors South. i such taxing measures will get voter ap- east Hunting- proval. K -The days of free-wheeling City Councils ton Beach are over in Huntington Beach and the gather at 1f sooner the incumbents and future earth- Eader School Y . dates realize it, the sooner the citizens can for the an. return to a belief in government of the pee- nual meeting pie,by the people and for the people. If you of SEHBNA Ibel strongly about this issue. write your on March 28, City Council and express your concern for 2000.This infrastructure funding. SEHBNA will continue to keep our year again members informed on infrastructure issues the hall was -_ and will continue to represent your interests packed. in these critical matters. 1\ Page 3 A neighborhood sets its goals Sivas Critical Agenda The Executive Board on June 22 approved the following Costa Mesa residents have fought for 10 years to have this bridge statement ofSEHBAs analysis of neighborhoodprob!eras and removed from the MPAH. Huntington Beach residents joined their its goals far Southeast Huntington Beach. effort in 1993.Local governments have spent 10 years and in excess of half a million dollars doing studies to determine the impact of not AES PLANT EMISSIONS AND NOISE Edison started having a bridge that has existed. building the Huntington Beach Generating Station an a No city involved in thishis matter would suffer a greater increase in 53-acre site in the mid 1950's. In 1958, units I and 2 traffic than Huntington Beach. began operation followed by units 3 and 4 in 1961 and unit 5,the gas Residents who now suffer adverse health effects and a deterimat- turbine peaking unit,in 1%9.Nitrogen oxide(NOx),the major can. ing quality of life as a result of a power plant.a sanitation plant,and tributor to smog, became a problem in the late 1970's when Edison a dump site that serve regional interests are being asked to suffer yet operated the plant at near-maximum capacity. High fuel costs and another regional impact. The City must demand that no more re- environmental concems caused Edison to switch to natural gas in the gional burdens be placed on Southeast Huntington Beach. 198Ux.which reduced the NOx emissions by about 90 percent. NOx is a product of fuel combustion. When the Huntington Beach plant ANNING STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION A gaping was purchased by the AES Corporation in 1998 it was operating at crack in the pump station will an Banning Avenue signals 20 percent of its 1090 megawatts capacity. AES intends either to its deteriorating condition. The 65-foot-deep cistern that refurbish the slum turbine units 3 and 4 (which have not operated gathers all of the storm water from our streets during mina and holds for a number of years)or replace them with equivalent capacity gas the water until it can be pumped into the good channel is moving turbines. east while the pumps remain behind.City workers told the Infmsuuc. Because of Southern California Edison's sale of the plant to AES lure Advisory Committee that the Banning pump station needed m- Corporation, more than$300,000 in taxes that formerly went to the pairs worse than any other pump station in Huntington Beach.This is state now goes to the City of Huntington Beach. Those taxes plus a not a comforting thought for residents who depend upon the pumps contemplated 6 percent gas user tax expected to be on the November to keep their homes from flooding. Repairs for this pump station 2000 ballot,make AES Corporation a very important player in Hunt- must be budgeted immediately. ington Beach's finances. The City ignmes the health and quality of life impacts of pollution on residents of the area.The 6 percent utility ADER PARK IMPROVEMENTS:Eider Park has only tax on fuel burned by AES does not make up for what residents here a swing set,a piece of playground equipment with a slide. suffer in pollution, the unattractive view of the rosi ng steel .trot- and several sand pods where playground equipment once tore. and the monotonous drone of the gas turbines. A significant stood. Our neighborhood has nearly 800 children who regularly use portion of City revenues generated by AES should be"marked for this equipment and the park for many activities.Besides the dearth of use in improving Southeast Huntington Beach. equipment,the park lacks the usual amenities included in most Hunt- ington Beach parks, fl'here is no place for parents to sit while their ASCON/NES1 DUMP SITE CLEANUP:This dumpsite children play.) An area that bears the burden of necessary services has been a visual blight and a source of distress and ran- for the entire region should at least have a reasonably equipped and cem for residents of this area for many years.Neighbors maintained neighborhood pink. have suffered the foul odor of styrene pits, danger to their homes from burning brush and debris,illicit and clandestine operations lurk- ETHANE GAS PROBLEMS: Methane gas ema- ing behind the trees, and campsites of homeless people. This situa- Rating from deep layers of ancient organic material tion most not continue.The State of California is lead agency and the poses a serious danger to residents living on Clans. City of Huntington Beach needs to take a more active stance to pm- tine and Susan. The city installed a venting system in the early tat the residents of this area as cleanup and development of this site 1990's. but the problem with seeping methane gas from penetration gets ready to area. of protective clay layers during sewer line installation in the 60's per- sisted.Readings taken in two places on Christine Drive in 1995 were BANNING AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION: Banning more than 900,000 parts per million. The legal Explosive Limit Avenue was designed for automobiles and utilities. Each (LEL)is 53,400 ppm.Also in 1995,the City found five other sites on day hundreds of children walking to school and adults Christine that had readings in excess of 100 percent of LEL.This is walking for exercise must negotiate a maze of fire hydrants, street a potentially dangerous situation for residents and must notbe al. signs,telephone and utility poles,street lamps,street light polo,guy lowed to continue. wires, cable and telephone boxes, and trees. Drivers speed unim- peded along this wide-open automobile thoroughfare while pedestal- ®CSD SEWER PLANT EXPANSION: Orange County ans must consider each step.In 1956, master plan designers did not Sanitation District emits newly two tons of pollution into have a school,neighborhood park,neighborhood library,or pedestri- our local air each day. That is 730 tons each year. The ans in mind when they produced the plan for Banning Avenue.Ban- law requires that polluters pay permit fees for the privilege of dump. Ring Avenue needs to be redesigned to accommodate extensive pe- ing pollutants into the air we breathe A recent study that OCSD did destrian use and to contribute to neighborhood beautification. with USC showed aoetaldchyde, formaldehyde, acetone, me- thylethylketone,methylimbulylketone,benzene,toluene.o-xylem,p/ BANNING AVENUE-19TH STREET BRIDGE: in xylem, TGNMO,and hydrogen sulfide flowing into the air during OCTA's Master Plan of Arterial Highways(MPAH)has a bridge linking Banning and 19th Street in Costa Mesa. (Coed..don paee4) Page 4 SOUTHEASTERN HUNTINGTON BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Critical Concerns CONCERNS LISTED IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER AES Plant Em..and Noise • • • • • ASCON/NESI Dump Site Cleanup • • • • • • • Banning Avenue Beautification • • • Banning Avenuer 91h Steed Bridge • • • • Banning Slomn Dram Pump Station • • • • • • • Eader Park Improvements • Melinme Gas Problems • • • OCSD Sower Plant Emissions • • • • Redevelopment of Industrial Area West of Magnolia • • • Wellendsand Ocean Pollution • • • • • (Conww,d/cam pegs!) Southeast Huntington Beach (Huntington Beach once had five rede- the treatment process.Chemical scrubbers treat the hydmgen sulfide velopment areas.Today it has one.)Much of the area is zoned indus. with hydrogen peroxide to repress odor. Chemical emissions are trial.Residents must have assurances that revenues will be used only trained with chlorine to control odor. According to the stndy, two- in this redevelopment area. and that our quality of life will not be stage biofrlters would remove all of the hydrogen sulfide odor and further compromised by industrial pollution. here 80 percent to 95 percent of the chemical discharges.Chemical scrubbers do not remove any of these chemical emissions. Neither �EFLANDS AND OCEAN POLLUTION: The plant has any biofilmrs. ocean is Huntington Beach's first est asset. It is an Biofrlters take more space than chemical scrubbers. Space is at a asset not because it provides us with a seemingly premium.OCSD has no facilities north of the easement for the Ban- never-ending place to dump our waste, but because the waters and ning/19th strees bridge.They plan to lease that area to Village Nues- beaches of the Pacific most attract many visitors and their dollars to cry. If the 10-year,effort to remove the bridge from the master plan Huntington Beach. were successful than there would be room for biofrlters. The City Water quality is affected by two types of pollution,the difference should insist that OCSD use the Invest and best technology to reduce between the two being deternmed by the source of input into the the health risks for residents.The City must insist that the Banning marine environment. Point source pollution enters the aquatic envi- bridge be removed from the master plan and that the easement be comment from a specific structural facility,such as a pipeline cutfall vacated so that OCSD can utilize the area for two stage biofihers. system,and can be generated from a variety of industrial and munici- pal facilities, including sewage treatment plants. oil refineries, or REDEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AREA power plants. Non-point source pollution,or polluted ronoff, is any WEST OF MAGNOLIA: The City is considering source that is not a point source and includes enoff from a vaddy of creating a Redevelopment Area roughly bounded by land uses such as agricultural,urban,forestry,or mineral extraction. PCH.Magnolia,Hamilton and Beach. Unlike a county.city or school It is not surprising that our beach suffered the greatest and sitar district,a redevelopment men can be created without the vole of the enduring pollution Imt summer.We have point source pollution from citizens affected. Unlike other levels of government. it can incur the power plant and the saturation plant and nunpoint pollution from bonded indebtedness without voter approval. Unlike other govern- the Santa Ana River, the Talbert Flood Comml Channel, the men(entities,it may use the power of eminent domain to benefit pri- Greenville-Banning Flood Channel,and the Huntington Beach Chon- vote interests. Once the redevelopment area has been created it can nel.The coastal wetlands,nmure's way of purifying runoff must be be merged into other existing redevelopment mess opening the door purchased and restored. and the use of our coastal waters in a re- for sues generated here to be spent improving areas other than gional cesspool must slop. Pagc 5 Membership Report Area Residences Memberships Members Percentage EXECUTIVE BOARD Blue 110 34 85 30.91% Blae Area: Brown 138 69 172.5 50.00% Charles Butler 9644029 Gray 64 18 45 28.13% Mike Callison 964-7I74 Green 370 81 202.5 21.89% Orange 166 44 110 26.51% BrOWn Area' Purple 150 50 125 33.33% John Scott.chair 962-1746 Red 352 113 282.5 32.10% Glen Woods 962-5017 Yellow 284 62 155 21.83% Gray Area Bruce Brain 968-6330 Non-Residents 13 32.5 Jim Mon. 965-2210 Green Area: Total 1634 484 1210 30.59% Cindy Morgan,vice-chair 965-1617 Roberta Wrye 964-3402 Oranee Area: Steve Homer 968-9545 EN Purple Are Kathy Richardson 964-6172 t a Jon Ely 964.8586 Rohen Owen 963-9071 Red Area: as a I T Fred Bennett.treasurer 964-7866 j WE George Mason 964.1457 11 q fellow Area: u �. '.�YneAA- Edward DeMeulle.sec'y. %2.7661 Maurice O'Sullivan %3.9325 L J m Touched by Angels 'aROwl _ E A In the more th;m four years that sc� VR�`� ' SEHRNA has been in existence,our = 3 I�^ newsletter has been made possible s by members Jim and Marilyn LEI I Cavener, owners or Boulevard printers, located at 7722 Talbert Avenue (714-848-3115), who have �abda IT.Braeh M I v.a donated paper, time and printing t costs. F 4 SEHBNA,222032 Capistrano Lane. Huntington Beach.CA 92646 Yes,we want to help maintain and improve our neighborhood.Here's our$10 check Last Name: First name: Addess Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Number of occupants age 18 and over living at residence: Page 6 Picnic tables slated for Eader Park, but new play equipment may depend on local fundraising efforts y v '^- Play equipment abounds at the city park at Golden West and Norma on Huntington Beach's westside. City officials have promised to install for promising to provide the tables. Rick Mortimer, chair of the park com- two new picnic tables and a bench at Eader But provision of more play equipment minee, has already raised $2.500 and esu- Park within two months. Chris Button, is for the park will probably depend on private mates that$7.000 to $10,000 might be pri- member of SEHBNA's committee for im- monetary contributions from residents of vately raised. The City, he said, has indi- proving Eader Park has repotte& the area. cared that matching contributions might be Currently, there is no place for parents available from city funds and from state and or grandparents to sit when they take chit- federal programs. dron to play on the park's meager equip- Mortimer pointed out that ironically the meat.Families often picnic in the park,sit- Join park now possesses less equipment than it ting on the grass, but food bags and other did three years ago. The city removed four containers frequently are blown away by the SEHBNA cloverlear' play sets from the park, term- wind to litter the park in another spot. For- Ing them outmoded and unsafe.However,it tunately, people who use the park usually Today replaced only one unit, oa pick up overlooked trash and place it in the Mortimer asked more residents to volun- provided barrels. leer to serve on his SEHBNA committee to Button, who negotiated for the tables assist in preparing a fundraising effort. and bench as a subcommittee of one, The committee at present consists of just thanked Daryl Smith, Huntington Beach three members: Mortimer, Button and lane deputy director of public works, and Jim Riley. Jones, superintendent of park maintenance, But play equipment is limited to one slide and a swing set at Eader Park in southeastern Huntington Beach t Ex-supervisor's support of dairies not a bunch of manure Page 1 of 3 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Friday,July 28, 2000 9:44 AM To: Tappan,Jean Subject: FW: Ex-supervisors support of dairies not a bunch of manure Ex-supervisor's support of dairies not a bunch of manure Filed: 0712712000 7/27/00 If you've see one pile of dung, you've seen them all. True or false? If you circled "T," you might find it odd that Mary K. Shell aligned herself with the Borba dairies project. Before signing as a governmental consultant to James and George Borba, Shell sided with Kern County growers fighting to keep Southern California sludge off southern San Joaquin Valley soil. The retired Kern County supervisor and the growers she represented were eventually rewarded with a county ordinance limiting the type of sludge, or processed human waste, that biosolids distributors can legally spread across this part of the valley. With less-than-appetizing bovine by-products representing such an important part of the Borba debate, some might conclude that Shell was supporting one variety of guano and opposing another. Not so, Shell says, pooh-poohing comparisons between recycled sewage and cow manure. "There's a huge difference," Shell says. "With sludge you've got industrial waste and heavy metals mixed in. That's not something you want on your farmland." In contrast, she notes, cow manure is a desirable fertilizer. Further, Shell believes her support for the Borba dairies is consistent with her record as an advocate for agriculture. Shell chaired statewide and national agribusiness committees as part of her duties as a three-term county supervisor, and she has strong family connections to 08/01/2000 Ex-supervisor's support of dairies not a bunch of manure Page 2 of 3 farming. But as Kern County's former representative to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Shell might have been expected to take a narrower view of a proposal like the Borbas', which was criticized for its potential contributions to Kern County's already-bad air and its possible impact on groundwater. Shell says people need not worry. "The Kern County Water Agency is satisfied by the Borbas' mitigation measures; Shell says. "Since the water flows from northwest to southeast, (dairy effluent) wouldn't have a chance of intermingling with the water bank. They're mitigating for PM-10 and (minimizing) methane, which is a matter of (controlling the animals') diet. They're not going to have much more air pollution than any other agricultural operation." Shell says there's a reason the Kern County farming community was so supportive of the Borbas, who got the conditional use permits they sought for a 28,000-head, double-dairy operation at Taft Highway and Buena Vista Road from the Board of Supervisors Tuesday night. "Farmers see themselves as being next," Shell says. "OK, you're against dairies. Are you going to be against carrots and grapes next?' The main thing is the message we would've sent, not only across California but the whole country: 'Kern County isn't a place for farming anymore.' That's not a message we want to send, not when we're the fourth-biggest agricultural economy in the United States." . Speaking of dairies: Larry Moxley knows a thing or two about assuaging public concern over potential groundwater contamination. For years, the prominent Bakersfield business consultant was a member of the Laidlaw-Buttonwillow brain trust, advising and lobbying on behalf of the toxic waste dump west of Bakersfield. Laidlaw (now Safety-Kleen Buttonwillow) was particularly interested in keeping the nearby burg of Buttonwillow (population 1,400) at ease. Moxley spoke at Tuesday's hearing on the Borba dairies, but not on the side one might expect, given his experience with industrial pollution risks: He opposed the dairies' 08/01/2000 Ex-supervisor's support of dairies not a bunch of manure Page 3 of 3 permit. Moxley was representing the McAllister Ranch planned community, which breaks ground on its 1,300-lot first phase as early as next year—about two miles from the Borba project. With home prices expected to top out in the $250,000 range, McAllister residents will be cut from a different socioeconomic cloth than Buttonwillow folks (whose 1990 median household income was about $20,000). Still, there are similar issues here. Ironic? Moxley didn't think so. "There's no comparison," he says. 01 represent a variety of businesses— health care clients, telecommunications, (trash) haulers—that cross all kinds of boundaries and issues. This is a completely different set of circumstances." Moxley says McAllister will not participate in efforts to force a referendum on the supervisors' decision to approve the Borbas' permit. "We respect their decision," he says. "We're going to take the dairy families at their word that they'll be good corporate citizens." C.P gl 1 200.The Baltemaeld Calitola an I Email the]Pobmaster Maoclated Pmas Cammaht Notice I PrNM Policy Slatement 08/01/2000 LAS VEGAS RJ:NEWS: Deal bolsters valley water Pagel of 4 �Bf4 L£T7£ 2 r u' Wednesday,July 26,2000 Printable version of %L Copyright®Las Vegas Review-loumal this story HOME PAGE Deal bolsters valley •HEADLINES• Water SECTIONS NEWS A plan to be submitted to federal officials SPORTS would buoy Southern Nevada's supply for the Nevada Gas future. ta.'.. Neavark Sea�lne By Michael Weissernstem BUSINESS Las Vegu Review4virmaltas vwas stae�.F_nenciai Cakum Nevada and six Western states have struck a stockromoiio historic deal to wean California from its LIFESTYLES overdependence on the Colorado River and set aside decades of interstate acrimony over the a4ok vour Trdvei region's most coveted resource. Lake Mead by tv Health blocking the Colorado R-Jeneretion California,Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, River in Black NEON Wyoming and New Mexico plan to deliver to Canyon.Under a plan federal officials on Thursday in Washington,D.C., to wean California Dining a plan to force extensive water conservation in from using the river's Snowgeige Califomia and dela b 15 ears the date when Las water,Lake Mead Nightlife y y y would be allowed to Vegas is expected to exhaust its water supplies. drop by as morn as movies "For Nevada, it's incredibly important," said 75 feet in a sustained TV Listings Pat Mulroy,general manager of the Southern drought,with the OPINION Nevada Water Authority. "It gives Nevada an shoreline receding by (iowmn!o assured water supply for a long period of time." or than 00 feet in FEEDBACK The plan gives California a 15-year deadline Photo by Jim.Laurie. IN-DEPTH for conserving water by lining porous irrigation OBITUARIES canals with concrete and transferring agricultural water to cities such as San Diego. CLASSIFIEDS California has been consuming water unused dnutn Guide by Arizona and Nevada, a supply that is WEATHER increasingly unsure as the two upstream states REAL ESTATE increase in population and use more of their supplies. SUBSCRIBE_ California negotiators insist that the state must .. '� - have a guaranteed water supply as it slowly lowers Recent Editions its demand to its legally allocated 4.4 million acre- feet. Sunday An acre-foot is about 326,000 gallons or mo"d" enough to serve a family of four or five for a year. TOesday Nevada has an annual allocation of 300,000 acre- Wednesday feet. Thereaay The plan ensures California's supply by http://www.1vr .com/lvrj_home/2000/Jul-26-Wed-2000/news/ 07/27/2000 LAS VEGAS RJ:NEWS: Deal bolsters valley water Page 2 of Edon allowing increased access to the water stored in 6*9rd" Lake Mead during the 15-year period established Aa".e by the seven states. Nevada also would be allowed Fun Stuff to tap more lake water. comics The proposal would allow Lake Mead to drop cros�rEs by as much as 75 feet in a sustained drought,with Mmos�ss the shoreline receding by more than 400 feet in KMs Mla some areas. cam'Y That could force lake officials to move some Extras boat ramps and restrooms. But only about 12 Yellow pow. additional feet of shoreline would be exposed if Buy Tiaxaa normal weather conditions persist as expected, said ry i.inxs David Donnelly,the water authority's deputy general manager. sow` The draft plan remains subject to Na To environmental review and revisions by Interior won for us Secretary Bruce Babbitt, who holds sole discretion coma over the river in its lower basin containing Rate us Arizona,California and Nevada. Some state officials said they expect the secretary to accept ��► the plan without major changes. "We're very happy with the document that the seven slates have agreed on, and we're optimistic _ that the Department of Interior will adopt the C om states'positron," said Larry Anderson,director of Utah's Division of Water Resources. The plan contains a clause prohibiting any significant drop in Lake Powell, the rivets other maJor reservov, which straddles Arizona and Utah .nm and generates millions of recreation dollars for surrounding communities. VIEW Drawing down Lake Mead in dry times would give California an assured supply. It also would move from 2007 to 2022 the date when Las Vegas is expected to be using all the river water to which it's entitled. Water conservation and schemes to inject river water into underground "water banks" in Southern Nevada and Arizona would push the date out to 2050. "Between our conservation and banking,we'll be able to stabilize Southern Nevada's water supply," Mulroy said. Environmental groups have pushed for the plan to provide additional water for Mexico's ailing Colorado River Delta, a once lush expanse of wetlands that shrank from 1.9 million to about 150,00 acres as river water went to users on both t S 1 5 sides of the border. TN A 1999 Environmental Defense Fund_=dy recommended that 00 QvtV lro acre- wer a year to maintain the remnants LLti25 PHASE 3 o the eta ecosystem. C, The plan contains no such provisions, but Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes,who will meet with the states Thursday,said the plan does not preclude future aid for the for the delta. "Those are serious issues that need to be dealt http://www.lvlj.com/Ivrj_homet2000/Jul-26-Wed-2000/news/ 07/27/2000 LAS VEGAS RJ:NEWS:Deal bolsters valley water Page 3 of 4 with on a bilateral basis," he said. "These guidelines were not designed to address the delta issues." The interstate deal comes as changes in Sunbelt population growth shift the politics of the river,which serves about 25 million people throughout the West. California has for decades watered its farm fields and suburban lawns with more water than allowed by the complex set of court decisions and interstate compacts governing use of the river. That excess supply has come from water unused by Nevada and Arizona upstream. Southern California's farmers use more than 3.8 million acre-feet of the approximately 5.2 million acre-feet that the state annually consumes. As Las Vegas,Phoenix and other population centers have used increasing proportions of Nevada's and Arizona's legal allocations of river water, California has come under increasing pressure to cut back. The deal to be presented to Hayes on Thursday would guarantee California the right to use water stored in Lake Mead in the years leading up to an expected deadline of 2016.Nevada also would be allowed to tap the reservoir and use the water. California outraged Utah and Nevada last year when it proposed drawing down Lake Mead by 112 feet, a drop that could have caused the shore to recede by as much as 2 miles in some areas. California negotiators backed away from the stance in subsequent talks, and the current plan more closely reflects a less drastic proposal by the six upstream states. �-ma—i�Gis story to a friend: Your friend's e-mail address: Your e-marl address: 3u]oIDiti;�, Reset Give us your FEMBXM on Fus or any story. BESTDYL—AS-VE`G� Fill out our OnlineReaders'Poll Why find a JOB? [News] fSports usiness [Lifestyles] FNeonj [Opimon] [in-depth] http://www.lvij.com/l"__ ome/2000/Jul-26-Wed-2000/news/ 07/27/2000 LA Times Page 1 of 3 Tired of credit card debt? i I bfaBplr Home I Archives I Print Edition I Home Delivery I Advertise I Site Map I Feedback I Help News Business Sports Impr/hvww.laGmeswnVnews/stateQ0000803/t000072713.hM1 Politics Travel Commentary Entertainment Classifieds Spina mmulk,mwie_a,an, sobs.hPmb". Back to story TV,reabumnb on,mmah Thursday, August 3,2000 By Luck or Skill, DWP Gets the Last Lau h ■ nergy: Utility's decision to eschew deregulation plan pays o as the rest of the state faces power shortages. By DOUGIAS P.SHUIT.aQg MOZINOD,TMwa Sba wine With much of California facing the threat of blackouts and in some cases having to deal with soaring electricity rates,the oft-criticized Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is sitting pretty,with enough power to meet the city's needs and to rake in huge profits by selling it elsewhere in the state. Things are going so well these days that the DWP says a once-staggering$4- billion debt has been bought down to$1.7 billion,with the utility expecting to be debt-free within two years.The millions of dollars the agency takes in by selling electricity on the open market--especially during peak summer months—is helping reduce the debt. And,even as electricity bills in San Diego have doubled in recent months,the DWP hopes to implement a 5%rate reduction in 2002. DWP General Manager David Freeman could hardly mask his glee Wednesday. "If you're fed up with electric rates,if you are worried about reliability,come to Los Angeles,"he said. By standing pat during a time of massive change in the electricity industry—a move that could easily have backfired—the DWP has emerged as one of the state's strongest players. Indeed,the utility's maverick course was so successful that some have suggested there was an element of luck in the turnaround. "It doesn't matter," Freeman said in interviews with The Times. "Luck is more important than skill." Things can still occasionally go wrong—an equipment failure at a converter station knocked out about 160 traffic signals Wednesday in the San Fernando Valley—but in general,that DWP luck is holding. The wild price swings in some areas and threats of blackouts in many parts of the state stem in large part from a sweeping utility industry deregulation bill approved by the Legislature in 1996,officials agree.The law made California a leader in utility deregulation and a testing ground for much of the nation. Under deregulation,investor-owned utilities,in exchange for massive financial concessions granted by the state,agreed to buy electricity from a statewide power exchange,a type of cooperative,that would be supplied at market rates by private suppliers. Historically,rates had been set by the California Public Utilities Commission,the regulatory agency that the utilities had to answer to for most of the last century. http://www.latimes.com/cgi-bin/print.egi 08/08/2000 LA Times Page 2 of 3 In theory, competitive pressures were supposed to drive down California's traditionally high power rates.The market price of electricity was kept down for a while, but utilities are now paying dramatically more for the electricity they buy. San Diego Gas& Electric,which deregulated faster than the state's two other major utilities, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas&Electric,passed higher market prices directly on to consumers,whose bills have more than doubled in recent months. By contrast,the DWP watched from the sidelines as investor-owned utilities charged into the deregulated utility marketplace. Some were predicting that the public utility would become road kill in the new em. The DWP at the time was struggling with its massive debt and anticipating majorjob reductions as the result of business decisions that in some cases were made decades before. But in a series of strategic decisions,DWP managers carved out an independent course. For one thing, the city chose not to participate in the deregulation plan mapped out by the Legislature. In another move now paying dividends,the agency increased its capacity in the late 1990s at a time when investor-owned utilities,like San Diego Gas& Electric, were selling their own power-generating plants. Beginning in 1998,the DWP revamped three shutdown power plants that are now producing an extra 960 megawatts. "With that surplus, we've been able to make these sales,"Freeman said. Today,the department can produce more than 7,000 megawatts,while demand for power in the city, even during the recent heat wave,has not toped 5,100,Freeman said. And with such fierce demand throughout the state during peak hours, the DWP can make an extra$250 per megawatt-hour. In the last year, the department made$140 million from sales of its excess electricity. Last month alone, it pulled in$35 million,an increase from July of last year,officials said. With profits coming in and debt dwindling, Freeman said the department could afford a 5% rate cut. Despite the favorable conditions,the question of possible deregulation,or privatization, hovers over the department, although Freeman strongly suggests that the D W 1"s current robust financial health is a good argument against it. Ultimately, utilities hope that private power firms will build more power- generating capacity and that prices will drop. If the prices ultimately fall below the level at which the DWP can supply the electricity,the city and its ratepayers will be at a disadvantage. But Freeman, a onetime head of the Tennessee Valley Authority and a strong advocate of public power,believes that public utilities will always be at a competitive advantage because they don't have the built-in pressure for higher profits that investor-owned utilities have. "This deregulation is a path that we deliberately chose not to travel,"Freeman said. "We have no intention of subjecting the people of Los Angeles to those kinds of risks." He added: "We intend to have electricity costs that are below the market price indefinitely." Freeman said a new$1.7-billion, 10-year capital investment plan he recently introduced will ensure that the DWP continues to have a relatively low-cost supply of electricity. The plan would be paid for with cash,part of which would come from selling the city's share of a massive coal-buming power plant in the Nevada desert. Additionally,the DWP expects to have cash to spend once it pays off its bond debt. The department is paying down the debt at a rate of$60 million to $70 million a month,Freeman said. The money raised under the plan,now under consideration by the City http://www.latimes.com/egi-bin/print.cgi 09/08/2000 LA Times Page 3 of 3 Council,would overhaul three aged power plants,weaning the city off older, more costly and higher-polluting plants. Freeman said the city would have plenty of electricity for the years between the sale of the Mohave Generating Plant in the desert and the completion of the three other plants. He said the council must act quickly for the DWP to sell its share of the Mohave plant by September, when a deal struck by two other power companies and the buyer expires. He said the department would make$190 million in profit by selling its share of the controversial plant,while also avoiding$75 million in expenditures to upgrade the facility to new environmental standards by 2001. Although much of that is in the future,Freeman was able to play Santa Claus on Tuesday by feeding badly needed electricity into the state's power grid,which helped put off the threat of rolling blackouts. He said the added power came from coal-fired plants that required air quality waivers.That means the DWP will have to take corrective action at some point.But Freeman said it was worth it. "We decided that we would keep the lights on in the state," he said. The power the DWP has been selling is expensive. Edison and PG&E,whose rates are still frozen by the PUC under the complex deregulation law,have not been able to pass the price hikes on to customers. But consumer advocates expect the two utilities to appeal to the PUC for the right to do so. "We are going to fight them if they try to pass on the extra costs," said Nettie Hogue.executive director of the Utility Reform Network,who is calling deregulation a failure. "We are not going to underwrite the entire cost of this failed experiment. The most innocent people in all this are the customers." Clarence Brown,a spokesman for Edison,said utilities believe that deregulation will ultimately work. Brown said he thinks the deregulated competitive market eventually"is going to be good for everyone involved." But he said "there are also glitches"that private utilities hope the state will correct. sus DWP Debt Note: As of Aug. 2, the department's debt was$1.74 billion. • � a Source: Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power Copyright 20M Los Angeles Times How low can we go7 http://www•.iatimes.com/cgi-bin/print.cgi 08/08/2000 Small Town's'Cryptosporidium Daze'Fails To Attract Visitors Pagel of2 Anderson, Blake From: Mary McDaniel[mfmcdanieI@rnclam.00m] Sent: Monday,August 14, 2000 8:31 AM To: Tom Dawes;Greg Leslie;Julia Norman; Ron Wildermuth; Michael Wenner; Cindy Gehman; Jenny Glasser; Blake Anderson; Debbie Burris; Richard Bell; Marilyn Smith; Steve R. Conklin; Roy Herndon; Rick Davis; Michelle Tuchman Subject: FW: Small Town's'Cryptosporidium Daze'Fails To Attract Visitors Happy Monday! I don't think that it is likely to replace the Children's Drinking Water Festival anytime soon. However, I couldnt fail to notice that"Crypty" on the kid's t-shirt looks a little bit like Jenny Groundwater..... --Mary Books I aadio News I store/subscriptions I National Distribution Ad Info I e O RaG15ERVICEE _`' I i LLLL 111I M A G 1 C" . i r 1 n.PQpt trvlenional.Eep Tlmn. 11 > the ONION 2 August 2000 Small Town's `Cryptosporidium Daze' Fails To Attract Visitors BLAKELY, GA--Blakely civic leaders were baffled last weekend as Cryptosporidium Daze, their elaborately planned summer festival celebrating the popular waterbome pathogen, failed to draw tourists to the Southwest Georgia town. "Just as Colquitt celebrates its agricultural heritage with Watermelon Days,we wanted to host a festival that reflected — —_ the uniqueness of our community;" Blakely Town Council _ - — president Jane Lyons said Monday. "When someone suggested a theme inspired by the historical event we're best known for, — t1!7�ntj�ll nunnro_ u! the Great Cryptosporidium Outbreak of 1988,we knew we had it Ini t t ii ni i i i t_ the answer." _ -= Twelve years ago,Lyons said, a small amount of pig feces — - seeped into the town's municipal water supply,contaminating —_—_—_____ it with cryptosporidium. As a result, 611 citizens contracted cryptosporidiosis,an intestinal disease marked by abdominal cramps, violent diarrhea,nausea, and fever. "If it weren't for our town's brush with cryptosporidium, the EPA never would have enacted the Surface Water Treatment Act of 1989," Lyons said. "It established drinking- — -- water standards for the entire country--and it all started right here in Blakely!" 08/14/2000 Small Town's'Cryptosporidium Daze Fails To AttractVisitors Page2of2 Much to the surprise of town-council members, unlike Colquitt's Watermelon Days and Columbia's Riverfest,which bring up to 15,000 visitors into the neighboring small towns each stunmer,Cryptosporidium Daze was sparsely attended. "It's a real mystery," Lyons said. "It was a nice,sunny day,the park was filled with booths, and somebody was out there in the big foam cryptosporidium mascot outfit shaking hands with everybody. Yet, somehow, the festival Flopped." ff The three-day event drew only seven non-residents, most of whom left shortly after arriving. N "I thought cryptosporidium was some type of flower," said Rhonda Weber,who drove to Blakely from Albany for the event. "Turns out,I was thinking of chrysanthemum." �.� After an outlay of nearly$4,000 for decorations,advertising, and equipment rental, Lions Club president Gary Milstead estimated that Cryptosporidium Daze brought in less than$45 in revenue. _ "We had anew mascot,Crypty The Cryptosporidium,created just for the event," said Milstead,pointing to poster bearing a grinning, single-celled parasite wearing a Blakely baseball cap. "We still have plenty of T-shirts left for sale if you want one." 6i CRYPTyf Even Blakely's own citizens were disinterested in the festival. A pageant to crown one lucky young Blakely girl "Cryptosporidium Above:Jeremy Luchs, 9,wears Queen"was canceled due to a lack of applicants. the T-shirt he won as the sole youth participant in the Prot...an Parade. Other poorly received events included the Name That Parasite contest, the Water Boil, the cryptosporidium-themed "haiku-off," and the Protozoan Parade, in which children could compete for prizes by dressing up as their favorite member of the phylum protozoa. With the unpopular event behind them, some members of the town council are wondering if they selected the wrong theme. "Maybe people just aren't as interested in cryptosporidium as they were in the late'80s," Lyons said. "Back then, if we announced a town meeting about cryptosporidium,every last person would show up. I have,however, heard a lot of buzz lately about the radon gas that was detected in some of the homes over by the railroad tracks. Well, I guess there's always next summer." ®Copyright 2000 Orion,Inc.,All rights reserved. http://"w.theonion.coM 13 !9 the ONION 2 August 2000 Ad Info I Copyright ®Copyright 2000 Onion, Inc., All rights reserved. Masthead I Contact Information I Privacy Pal 08/14/2000 y9 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING JULY 199 2000 oJNS A I rqr� 9 � b ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 0 Minutes for Board Meeting Fi Page 2 07/19/00 �o ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on July 19, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler X Peter Green, Vice Chair Dave Garofalo A Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Jan Debay Tom Thomson A Lynn Daucher Roy Moore X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson A James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X John M. Gullixson Ken Ryan X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer James Evans X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller X Jim Silva Chuck Smith A Peer Swan Darryl Miller X Charles E. Sylvia Art DeBolt X 11 Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Blake Anderson, General Manager; Jean Tappan, Acting Board Secretary; Patrick Miles; Doug Stewart; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Andrei loan; Chuck Wnsor, John Linder, Layne Baroldi; Kevin Hadden OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Terry Lane; Debbie Cook; Greg Woodside; Jeff Bower, John F. Scott Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 07/19/00 v MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Aaena Active Director Alternate Director Los Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia Art DeBolt REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode announced that the U.S. Senate is one step away from including $2 million in funding for the GWR project in next years budget Chair Eckenrode reported that the PDC Committee will meet on August 3 and the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Diversion Policy and Financing will meet on August 2. The OMTS and FAHR Committees will not be meeting in August. Director Jan Debay was presented a Resolution of Commendation and a plaque for her service to the Board as Chair from November 1998 to July 2000. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report- REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas Woodruff did not make a report APPROVAL OF MINUTES Director Russell Patterson asked that the minutes be changed to reflect his abstention on payment of claims Nos. 27254 and 27612. The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 2000 be deemed approved, as revised. Director Neugebauer abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits W and'B', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS O6/15/00 06/30/00 Totals $5,850,225.85 $7.901,789.10 Director Patterson abstained on Warrant Nos. 28221 and 28222. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 07/19/00 a NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the July 19, 2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 28, 2000 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the July 5, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 5, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve additional funds of $126,020 for ongoing participation in a cooperative project with the City of Huntington Beach and County of Orange for follow-up studies related to the Huntington Beach closure investigation, for an estimated amount not to exceed $214,653. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to: 1) Amend the Agreement for the Management of Biosolids and Construction and Operation of Storage/Compact Facility to delete all references to the Storage/Composting Facility and the Property, leaving in place only those provisions relating to the management of Class B biosolids at Yakima's Existing Sites; and 2) Terminate the Agreement for Option and Right of First Refusal on the Proposed Yakima Storaga/Composting Facility. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Past Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the July 6, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the Meeting held July 6, 2000 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 07/19/00 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$91,834 and a time extension of 56 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,078,275. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.61, with R. Fox Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$19,811, increasing the total contract amount to $221,511; and (2)Accept High Pressure Compressed Air Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-61, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with R. Fox Construction, Inc. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements,Job No. J-33-1,with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$56,978 and 10 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,517,234. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to New Engineering Trailers at Plant No. 1,Job No. J-75, with Brandall Modular Corporation, authorizing a credit to the contract of ($2,360), decreasing the total contract amount to$234,061; and (2)Accept New Engineering Trailers at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-75,with Brandall Modular Corporation as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Avenue to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R,with Sancon Engineering 11, Inc., authorizing a deduction of($100,650), decreasing the total contract amount to$1,240,085; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley to Orangethorpe; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Avenue to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R, with Sancon Engineering 11, Inc., authorizing an addition of$16,400, increasing the total contract amount to $1,256,485; and (3)Accept Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley to Orangethorpe; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Avenue to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Sancon Engineering II, Inc. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid),with Barnard Construction Company, Inc., authorizing an addition of$100,000, increasing the total contract amount to$7,567,622; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Minutes for Board Meeting ' Page 6 07/19/00 Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), with Barnard Construction Company, Inc., authorizing an addition of$236,000, increasing the total contract amount to$7,803,622; and (3) Accept Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R (Rebid), and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R (Rebid), as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Barnard Construction Company, Inc. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with MacDonald Stephens Engineers/RW Beck to provide engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos. 3-52, 5-53, 5-54, and 11-28, for an amount not to exceed$499,300. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson to provide engineering services for the Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer, Contract No. 2-21-1, for a total amount not to exceed $274,481. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science Inc. for Plant Automation& Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$82,763, increasing the total amount not to exceed $5,599,593. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a sole source agreement with Gerald Jones for project development services in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, in the amount of$67.50 per hour, plus actual travel expenses, for up to 300 hours, in an amount not to exceed $30,000. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the July12, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 12, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of June 2000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file 2000/01 Strategic Goals Workplan. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-15, Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures Made in Advance for FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-term Financing. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 07/19/00 f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Lease Agreement with Seaside Financial Corporation (Specifiaation No. L-009-1) for lease of 18.09 acres of land at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley for a one-year period beginning September 1, 2000. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00- 16,Authorizing the District's Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest District's Funds; Adopting District's Investment Policy Statement and Performance Benchmarks for fY 2000-01; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-14. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve issuance of Series 2000 Refunding and Reimbursement COPs, not to exceed $230 million; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. 00-17, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the District of Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to the Execution and Delivery of Orange County Sanitation District Refunding Certificates of Participation, Series 2000, authorizing the Execution and Delivery of such Certifications Evidencing Principal in an Aggregate Amount of not to exceed$230,000,000, authorizing the Distribution of a 2000 Official Statement in connection therewith and authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the District of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992, and authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, and authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the District of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993, and authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions; and (3) Direct staff to develop a plan for competitive selection of Remarketing Agents for the District's variable rate COPs following issuance and settlement of the Series 2000 COPS, and report back to the FAHR Committee. 15. A verbal report was presented by Director Debay, Chair of Ad Hoc Committee Re Urban Runoff Diversion Policy and Financing, re July 12, 2000 meeting, where the Committee also heard from Ron Linsky, Executive Director of the National Water Research Institute (NWRI). NWRI is funding research regarding urban runoff pollution associated with the Talbert Marsh. Data and the draft report from the research will be available to the District in August, which will allow staff an opportunity to comment on it before the final report is published. Kevin Hadden, Acting Manager of Environmental and Monitoring Compliance Division, made a presentation entitled, "Dry Season Urban Runoff: Does the Buck Stop Here?", which was presented at the Ad Hoc Committee meeting. The Ad Hoc Committee is reviewing options for how much and who to charge for these services. The initial testing of the runoff has indicated that the District's system can safely receive these flows and still meet the strict requirements of our ocean discharge permit. The staff will continue to test the diverted flows to assure compliance with our permit. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 07/19/00 16. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE , COMMITTEE MINUTES: A brief verbal report was presented by Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re the meeting held on July 17, 2000. A special meeting has been scheduled for July 31, 2000. Chair Eckenrode also announced that Director Brian Donahue has been appointed to the Joint Cooperative Committee, replacing Director Peer Swan. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 19, 2000 to be filed. 17. DRAFT AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41: Director Gullixson addressed the Board prior to the presentation and noted that the Yorba Linda City Council, on July 18, 2000, voted unanimously to request the District to defer any action on the EIR, and to not adopt the findings and selection of Alternative D until the City had the opportunity to do further study within the next 30 days. A motion was moved and seconded to continue Items Nos. 17(c) and (d) to the August Board Meeting. There was an extended discussion among the Directors on the subject of the continuance request from SAWPA and the City of Yorba Linda. There was an extensive discussion among the Directors, and several questions of Staff. Consultants, and General Counsel. It was noted to the Board that the action approving Resolution No. OCSD 00-18 and proceeding ahead with Altemative D does not legally obligate the District to construct the facilities per that Alternative. The action is limited solely to the CEOA process and approvals. Separate actions will be presented at a later date, to include design and construction for Board consideration and action. There was a substitute motion,which was MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: a. Receive and file May 2, 2000 meeting minutes for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River re: District staff and Santa Ana Watershed Authority (SAWPA). b. Receive and file Final Environmental Impact ReporVEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSO 00-18, Making Certain Findings Relative to Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Draft Environmental Impact Reporl/Environmental Impact Statement for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41; adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; directing staff to proceed with Alternative "D"; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 07/19/00 d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-19, Certifying the Final Environmental Impact ReporVEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41, has been completed in compliance with CEOA. FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct Staff to discuss the project with the City of Yorba Linda and SAWPA representatives within the next 30 days. Directors Bankhead, Gullixson, Leyes, Saltarelli and Walker opposed. 18. There was no closed session ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:59 p.m. cg Secretary of the B ar of Directors of n rnge County Sanitation District K1 paa\agendaWoard Mtoum@ Board M1nulesW71W0.Coc Claims Paid From 611100 to 6116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 27902 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $ 43,252.24 Professional Services-Sanitary Sewer Evaluation 27903 Brown&Caldwell 222,801.39 Engineering Services PI-37 27904 Carollo Engineers 47,381.87 Engineering Services P1-36-2&J-39 279D5 Computerized Facility Integration 331,796.67 Engineering Service J-25-1 27906 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 61.926.81 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 27907 CH2M Hill 65.084.96 Engineering Service J-71-4 27908 Robert F. Drwer Associates 28.729.00 Workers'Compensation&Employers'Insurance 279D9 Aigas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 27,812.79 Safety Supplies 27910 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 30,680.56 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 27911 Manley's Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 30,480.00 Plant 2 Operation Center Boiler 27912 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 44.085.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 27913 Science Applications Inti.,Corp. 49,087.80 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 27914 Sempra Energy Solutions 93,233.76 Natural Gas Spec No. 170 27915 Spieker Properties 81,720.90 Connection Fees Refund Transfer 27916 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 76,6D9.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 27917 Vulcan 49,639.53 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 27918 Western States Chemical,Inc. 34,907.70 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 27919 Advance Constructors,Inc 49.106.45 Construction 5-41-1 27920 Ark Construction Company 66,277.17 Construction J-55&P1d4-4 27921 J W Contracting Corporation 40,500.00 Construction P2-60 27922 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,296,855.OD Construction P2-39 27923 S.S.Mechanical Corp 78.854.38 Construction P46-2 27924 Southern Contracting Company 63.415.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1 21925 A-Plus Systems 3,371.55 Notices&Ads 27926 Aautim Fasteners 20.02 Tool Supplies 27927 Great American Printing Co. 1.425.60 Office Supplies 27928 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 5,499.82 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 27929 Advance Constructors,Inc. 16,455.00 Construction J-34-1, P2-35.5 27930 Aidce Systems, Inc. 221.86 Fiber Optic Equipment 27931 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 27932 American Training Resources, Inc. 533.36 Training Materials 27933 Analytical Technology,Inc. 130.50 Instrument Supplies 27934 Applied Industrial Technology 29.09 Electrical Parts&Supplies 27935 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement 27936 AVR:Audio Video Reporting Services 833.11 Audio Video Services 27937 Awards&Trophies By Bea 166.61 Plaques 27938 ASTD 150.00 Membership 27939 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.76 Telephone Service 27940 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,961.81 Long Distance Telephone Service 27941 AT&T Wireless Services 75.31 Cellular Telephone Service 27942 AWSI 349.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 27943 Battery Specialties 241.79 Batteries 27944 Bauer Compressors 43.97 Tools&Supplies 27945 Beach Paving,Inc. 325.00 Asphalt Repair Page 1 of 7 - Claims Paid From 611100 to 6115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 27946 Boise Radiator Service 500.54 Truck Repairs 27947 Boyle Engineering Corporation 11,835.61 Engineering Services P7<1 27948 C.S.M.F.O 392.00 Notices&Ads 27949 C.S.U.F.Foundation 8,750.00 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 27950 Calif Centrifugal Pump 2,211.70 Pump Supplies 27951 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,lnc. 628.66 Service Agreement 27952 Carl Warren&Co. 1,505.23 Insurance Claims Administrator 27953 Charles P.Crowley Co. 507.20 Instrument Parts 27954 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas, N.A. 6,893.71 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 27955 Cheyenne Livestock&Products,Inc. 3,08700 Storage Cabinets&Rope 27956 City of Fountain Valley 1,866.00 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Fees 27957 Compressor Components Of California 818.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 27958 Connell GM Pans 70.26 Truck Supplies 27959 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,717A3 Electrical Supplies 27960 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 462.77 Plumbing Supplies 27961 Converse Consultants 9,616.40 Consulting Services 11-17-3 279U Corporate Express Imaging 685.28 Computer Supplies 27963 Corporate Express 482.90 Office Supplies 27964 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 11.355.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.989M9 27965 Council of Stale Governments 155.00 Registration 27986 Cummins Allison Corp. 936.00 Accounting Equipment Maim.Agreement 27967 CASA 200.00 Conference Registration 27968 CEM Corporation 135.72 Lab Supplies 27969 CEPA Company 85.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 27970 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 2,437.50 CCTV Sewer Inspection 27971 CPI-The Allerna0ve Supplier,Inc. 270.16 Lab Supplies 27972 CR&R,Inc. 1.260.00 Container Rentals 2i973 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 1,050.00 Lab Analysis 27974 CRM Learning 2,968.58 Training Supplies 27975 CWEA Membership 285.OD Membership 27976 Data Clean Corporation 550.00 Service Contract 27977 Del Mar Analytical 2,539.00 Biosolids Analysis 27978 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 3,866.66 1 HP LaserJet Printer 27979 DeZudk C/O Niscc/SoulhWest 1,240.70 Valves 27980 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 2.142.42 Paint Supplies 27981 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 830.00 Medical Screening 27982 Eldridge Products 90.02 Instrument Maint.Service 27983 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 450.00 Training Registration 27984 Enchanter, Inc. 5,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 27985 Environmental Data Solutions Grps,LL.0 4,800.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt.Sys.Implementation Project 27986 Electrical Power Training Center 8,700.00 Training Registration 27987 Voided Check - - 27988 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 1.124.30 Lab Supplies 27989 Flo-Systems,Inc. 95.10 Pump Supplies 27990 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 10,815.40 Engineering Services P-183 Page 2 of 7 Clairne Paid From 611/00 to 6115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 27991 Franklin Covey 27.76 Office Supplies 27992 Fry's Electronics 1,077.39 Computer Supplies 27993 City of Fullerton 155.25 Water Use 27994 FM International,Inc. 8,640.73 Professional Services J-25-1 27995 G.T.Hall Company 124.14 Electrical Equipment Service 27996 General Electric Supply Company 1,111.87 Electric Parts 27997 GTE California 2,228.65 Telephone Services 27998 George Yardley Co. 1,941.42 Lab Supplies 27999 Gierfich-Mitchell,Inc. 6,059.40 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 28000 Goldenwest Window Service 1,844.00 Window Cleaning Service 280D7 WIN Grainger,Inc. 1.236.82 Electrical&Labeling Supplies 28002 Graphic Distributors 780.98 Photographic Supplies 28003 Graybar Electric Company 132.00 Electrical Supplies 280D4 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 166.72 Janitorial Supplies 280D5 Edwards Systems Technology 2,125.D0 Safety Service Agrement 280D6 Harker Equipment Company 193.57 Truck Supplies 28007 Hach Company 317.86 Lab Supplies 28008 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Ina 820.12 Plumbing Supplies 28009 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 187.45 Catering Services 28010 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 7,805.04 Engineering Service P1 4" 28011 Home Depot 133.71 Small Hardware 28012 City of Huntington Beach 26.14 Water Use 28013 I. D. Industries,Ina 155.47 Electrical Supplies 28014 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 5.192.50 Records Management Program 28015 Idexx 1,222.41 Lab Supplies 28016 Imaging Plus, Ina 1.203.57 Printing Service 28017 Industrial Air Compressor 560.61 Compressor Supplies 20018 Industrial Threaded Products, Ina 3.351.99 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 28019 In61co Degremont,Ina 1.164.17 Mechanical Parts 28020 Irvine Photo Graphics 6.92 Photographic Services 28021 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 28022 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 28023 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade 28024 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 2,550.OD Training Registration 28025 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 9DO.00 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation 28026 Johnstone Supply 843.76 Electrical Supplies 28027 K S.Dunbar&Associates 9,ODO.W Engineering Services 241 28028 Karen Monaco&Associates 9,375.00 FIS Support Services 28029 Kearney&Associates 2,371.25 Training Registration 28030 Kelar Corp 480.00 Professional Services-Customizing Reports 28031 Kerry Consulting Group 1,249.99 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 28032 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,944.92 Tools 25033 Gerald R.Jones 4,446.63 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 28034 Line-X Protective Coatings 387.38 Truck Supplies 28035 Lurxi's 88.00 Meeting Expense Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 611100 to 6116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28036 Manhole Adjusting 260.00 Manhole Repair 28037 Mail Chlor, Inc. 1,956.55 Valves 28038 Mc Junkin Corporation 2,488.49 Plumbing Supplies 28039 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 725.10 Tools 28040 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 2,844.60 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28041 Millbonius, Inc. 15.00 Freight 28042 Mission Uniform Service 1,734.17 Uniform Rentals 2BD43 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 28044 Montgomery Watson 6,000.00 Professional Service-Wastewater Analysis 28045 Management Action Programs, Inc. 1,100.00 Training Registration 28046 MCR Technologies,Inc. 2,311.60 Instrument Supplies 28047 National Business Womens Leadership Assoc. 248.00 Training Registration 28048 National Plant Services,Inc. 8,970.00 Vacuum Truck Services 28049 Neal Supply Co. 462.25 Plumbing Supplies 28050 Newark Electronics 1.028.08 Instrument Supplies 28051 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 12,298.61 LubdcanUDiesel Fuel 28052 Orange County Pump Co. 1,659.35 Pump Supplies 28053 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 62.67 Fittings 28054 Oxygen Service Company 110.90 Specialty Gases 20055 OCB Reprographics 1,531.55 Printing Service-Spec P-173 20056 Pacific Bell 15.99 Telephone Services 28057 Pacific Bell Internet Services 648.00 Internet Service 28058 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,101.58 Plumbing Supplies 28059 Parker Supply Company 8,242.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28060 Parkhouse Tire Co. 311.89 Tires 28061 Paveway 175.00 Asphalt 28062 Peak Technologies 1,902.80 Lab Supplies 28063 Power Measurement Limited 2,250.00 Training Registration 28064 Precision Backhoe 6W.00 Equipment Rental 28065 Cambridge Integrated Service 2.083.33 Workers Camp.Claims Admin. 28056 PCS Express 101.00 Courier Service 28067 Quantena Environmental Services 2,328.00 Lab Analytical Service 28088 Quiokalan Technologies 6.502.50 Professional Service-Software 28069 OOS, L.L.C. 258.52 Investment Management Program Service 28070 Rain for Rent 6,388.61 Pumping Equipment Service 28071 Remy Industries 60.00 Contract Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification 28072 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 320.00 Auto Repair 28073 RM Controls 552.89 Instrument Supplies 28074 RPM Electric Motors 1,214.29 Electric Motor Repair 28075 Safety-Kleen 1,025.44 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 28076 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 118.67 Publication 28077 Scott Specially Gases,Inc. 34.40 Specialty Gases 28078 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 4,231.00 Lab Equipment Parts 6 Service 28079 Second-Sun 148.70 Light Fixtures 28080 Shepherd Machinery Co. 374.52 Truck Supplies Page 4 of 7 Olsims Paid From 611100 to 0118100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28081 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 2,492.61 Tools/Hardmm 28082 Skater, Inc. 316.35 Lab Supplies 28083 SoBView Computer Products 24Z70 Computer Supplies 28084 Southern California Edison S,SW.69 Power 28085 Southern California Gas Company 187.50 Natural Gas Meter Calibration 28086 Sparkle8s 2,007.37 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 2111 Spading Instruments, Inc. 2,014.71 Instrument Supplies 28088 Spartan Tool, L.L.C. 257.00 Training Registration 28089 Solar Turbines,Inc. 40.95 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28090 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 137.35 Electric Cad Pans 28091 Temperament Research lnsfitute 200.00 Consulting Service-Safety Training 28092 Foxboro Company 1,575.85 Instrument Supplies 28093 The Merdwood Corporation 3,145.23 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 28094 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 214.07 Mechanical Supplies 28095 Time Warner Communications 40.42 Cable Services 28096 Tony's Look 8 Safe Service&Sales 51.15 Locks 8 Keys 28097 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. 1.550.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 28098 The Unisource Corporation 819.78 Office Supplies 28099 United Parcel Service 15.00 Parcel Services 28100 United States Government Prinfing Office 12.00 Publication 28101 Unocal 76 226.54 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 28102 Valley Cities Supply Company 394.60 Plumbing Supplies 28103 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 591.75 Tank Heater 28104 Village Nurseries 10.51 Landscaping Supplies 28105 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5,889.72 Lab Supplies 28106 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,610.89 Security Guards 28107 Water Environment Federation 260.25 Publication 28100 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 13,705.86 Safely Supplies 28109 West-Lila Supply Company, Inc. 615.44 Electrical Supplies 28110 Weslfall Interior Resources 1,976.00 Office Furniture 28111 White Cap Industries 36.85 Painting Supplies 28112 Wiztec,Inc. 8W.00 Computer Supplies 28113 Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 28114 WEF Membership 95.00 Membership 28115 Xerox Corporation 9.358.82 Copier Leases 28116 Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Inc. 133.03 Instrument Supplies 28117 CNA Trust 2,584.55 Construction 541-1 29118 Union Bank of California 8.761.59 Construction Pt-06.2 8 J-53 28119 Union Bank of California 11,136.02 Construction 11-17-3 28120 James E.Colston 1,368.69 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 28121 Thomas M. Flanagan 1,379.30 Meeting/training Expense Reimb. 28122 James W.Matte 1,353.44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28123 Charters D.McGee 205.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28124 Michael D.Moore 147.62 Meeting7Training Expense Reimb. 28125 Moyassr T.Yahya 350.00 MeatinglTraining Expense Reimb. Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From W1100 to 6115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28126 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 555.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 28127 Mike Build and Gateway 3,00D.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 28128 Orange County Sanitation District 449.07 Petty Cash Reimb. 28129 Blue Cross of California 171,040.80 Medical Insurance Premium 28130 Nat West Markets 64,913.14 COP Letter of Credit Fees 28131 Orange County Sanitation District 407,382.39 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 28132 So.Cal.Gas Company 28,870.58 Natural Gas 28133 The Yakima Company 33,011.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 28134 A-1 Beach Rubber Stamp 53.88 Stamp Supplies 28136 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,105.00 Vacuum Truck Services 28136 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 66.48 Telephone Service 26137 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 152.22 Valve Supplies 28138 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 28139 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 28140 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 28141 Computer Associates International 1,591.48 Software Maint.Agreement 28142 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 546.13 Electrical Supplies 28143 County Wholesale Electric Co. 57.11 Electrical Supplies 28144 Dal Mar Analytical 816.00 Blosolids Analysis 28145 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 28146 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 28147 GTE California 4.478.69 Telephone Services 28148 GE Power Management 2,864.OD Instrument Supplies 28149 Hach Company 897.35 Lab Supplies 28150 Hummingbird Communications 1,712.57 Software Maint. 28151 Industrial Metal Supply 392.84 Metal 20152 SlateNet 200.00 Online Service 28153 Voided Check - - 28154 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,388.07 Dues Deduction 28155 Align Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 497.31 Safety Supplies 28156 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 14.17 Tools 23157 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13,834.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28158 Monster.Com 27500 Notices&Ads 28159 Management Action Programs,Ina-NwpL Bch. 6,000.00 Management Consulting Service 28160 Mgmt.Action Programs, Inc.-Sherman Oaks 2,200.00 Training Registration 28161 National Plant Services, Ina 205.00 Vacuum Truck Services 28162 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 12,732.00 Training Registration 28163 Network Construction Services 4,874.05 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project 28164 Orange County Family Support 473.60 Wage Garnishment 28165 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 28166 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 28167 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 28168 Court Order 296.OD Wage Gamishmenl 28169 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 28170 Project Management Institute 160.00 Membership Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 611100 to 6/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28171 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 656.75 Instrument Supplies 28172 R.A.Reed Electric 7,950.23 Motor Overhaul 28173 Rick Arbour&Associates 1,302.00 Consulting Service-O&M Worker Competency&Training Project 28174 Rocky Mountain Water Environ.Assoc. 250.00 Meeting Registration 2111 Rolo Router-N.O.C411 600.00 Sewer Una Repair 28176 Schneider Electric 8,986.59 Software Maint.Agreement 28177 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 54.42 Tools 28178 Slemon.Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-SARWG&$1,000 Chino Basin Transfer 28179 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 150.00 Emission Fees 28180 Southern California Edison 2.018.18 Power 28181 Spicer America 1.377.05 Software 28182 Textile Engineering Associates 10.453.92 Belt Press Supplies 28183 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 55.44 Mechanical Supplies 28184 The Unisource Corporation 578.67 Office Supplies 28155 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 28186 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,510AS Door Repair 28187 Voided Check - - 28188 Layne T. Baroldl 142.20 Meeting Expense Raimb. 28189 James A.Campbell 1,995.14 Reissue Stale Dated Payroll Check 28190 Elaine Galvez 899.34 Reissue Stale Dated Payroll Check 28191 Andrel loan 629.52 Meeting/Training Expense Raimb. 28192 Michael D.Moore 405.02 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28193 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 5,565.00 Processing Fee for Septic Tank Owner Sewer Refunds 28194 County of Orange 1.250.00 Permit Fee 28195 Knotrs Berry Farm 6.653.14 Employee Deposit Transfer 28196 Orange County Sanitation District 19.294.14 Worker's Comp.Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,206,521.74 Payroll Disbursements 19339-19339 Employee Paycheck $ 1,194.39 Termination 19340-19481 Employee Paychecks 163,268.75 Biweekly Payroll 6/14100 19482-19462 Director Paycheck 108.19 Adjustment 19483-19483 Employee Paycheck 779.22 Termination 49188-49636 Direct Deposit Statements 656,020.78 Biweekly Payroll 6/14/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821,971.33 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Associabon $ 146,704.26 May Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 335.589.78 May Interest Payment on 199D92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 294,6W.72 May Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 44,782.02 311100.5/31100 Quarterly Liquidity Fee on Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 821,732.78 Total Claims Paid 611100-6116100 $ 5,850,225.85 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 6116100 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 28197 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation $ 46,737.93 Emissions Monitoring Services&Electrical Supplies 28198 Barclays Bank PLC 85,152.23 COP Letter of Credit 28199 Residuals Processing, Inc. 236,121.75 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 28200 Brown&Caldwell 421,554.71 Engineering Service Pl-37 28201 Carollo Engineers 30.676.05 Engineering Service J-25-4 28202 Cydus Envirosystems,Inc. 74,263.32 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Fk4ation Process 28203 J.D.Edwards 57,539.48 Annual Software Update&Maint Agreement 28204 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 58,414.22 Misc.Construction-Gas Line Replacement Sewer Repair&Motor Installation 28205 Kemiron Paci6q Inc. 15D,149.D4 Ferric Chloride NO 9-27-95 28206 Lee&Ro,Inc. 30,844.80 Engineering Service J-47,P2-39,P2-47-1,549.6-50&5-51 28207 Orange County Water District 48,657.76 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 28208 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 196,206.82 Engineering Services J-42 28209 Polydyne, Inc. 33.890.72 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 28210 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 117.560.55 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 28211 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 250,000.00 Annual Membership MO 3-26-97 28212 Southern California Edison 45.425.65 Power 28213 Statoil Energy, Inc. 145,O1)0.00 Gen Gen Engines Overhaul 28214 SPEC Services,Inc. 231,431.82 Engineering Services J-33-1 28215 Techno Coatings 29.780.00 Painting Services-Surge Tower No.2 28216 Tule Ranch Magan Farms 75,883.77 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 28217 The Yakima Company 29,469.61 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 28218 3 Com Corporation 26,636.44 Computer Hardware Maint 25219 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 1,389,746.80 Construction 335R&3-1 iR 28220 Bmndall Modular Corp 35,690.58 Construction J-75 28221 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 674,133.45 Construction 338.1 28222 Ken Thompson,Inc. 416,566.73 Construction 11-17-3 28M Union Bank of California 46,285.20 Construction 11-173, Retention 28224 Union Bank of California 74.903.72 Construction 338-1,Retention 28225 Union Bank of California 154,416.20 Construction 3-35R,Retention 28226 Accurate Measurement Systems 1.625.37 Instrument Supplies 28227 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Freight 28228 Airborne Express 24.46 Air Freight 28229 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 75.97 Safety Supplies 28230 American Compensation Assoc. 160.00 Membership 28231 American Express 13,641.25 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services 28232 Analytical Technology,Inc. 653.10 Instrument Supplies 28233 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 750.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 28234 Appleone Employment Service 8,292.94 Temporary Employment Services 28235 Applied Indusbial Technology 54.83 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28236 Arms Data Security 204.00 Of ile Back-Up Tape Storage 28237 Asbury Environmental Services 175.00 Waste Oil Removal 28238 Auma Actuators,Inc. USA 453.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28239 Awards&Trophies By Bea 30.65 Plaques Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 6116100 to 6130/00 Wamml No. Vendor Amount Description 28240 ABS Group,Inc 205.00 Training Supplies 28241 Acoustical Material Services 451.36 Ceiling Tile 28242 AKM Consulting Engineers 5,161.94 Consulting Services 11-17-3 26243 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security Equipment Maint. 28244 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 393.97 Telephone Service 28245 American Telephone It Telegraph Corp. 167.55 Telephone Service 28246 AWSI 33.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 28247 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 274.95 Instrument Supplies 29248 Battery Specialties 349.11 Batteries 28249 Baudville 16.90 Training Supplies 28250 Bauer Compressors 2.638.31 Safety Supplies 28251 Bloomberg L.P. 5,301.30 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14-93 28252 Boyle Engineering Corporation 16.839.85 Engineering Services 7-27 28253 Bush&Associates,Inc 795.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 28254 Cal-Glass,Inc. 203.11 Lob Equipment Service 28255 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1.325.19 Pump Supplies 28256 Calolympic Safety 325.35 Safety Supplies 28257 Callrol, Inc. 819.47 Elecrcal Parts&Supplies 28258 Cambridge Isotope Labs 180.91 Lab Supplies 28259 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 21.796.16 Engineering Service J40-3,2.37&3-25 28260 Canus Corporation 18,911A1 Fiber Optic Cable 28261 Cad R.Nelson,P.E. 2,800.00 Engineering Consultant 241 28262 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 18,928.00 Engineering Service J-71-1 &2 26263 Cheyenne Livestock&Products, Inc. 5,911.00 Safety Supplies 28264 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 7.507.53 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 28265 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 7,738.70 Professional Services- Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 28266 Compressor Components Of California 3,081.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28257 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 9,862.50 Computer Mainl.Agreement 28268 Concrete Pump Repair 1,147.01 Instrument Supplies 28289 Connell GM Parts 103.71 Truck Supplies 28270 Consolidated Elect, Distributors, Inc. 3,770.15 Electrical Supplies 28271 Consulting Psychologists Press 542.85 Training Supplies 28272 Cooper Energy Services 8.04 Engine Supplies 28273 Cooper Energy Systems 4,234.95 Training Registration 28274 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 28275 Corporate Express 1,765.18 Office Supplies 28276 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc 12.950.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 28277 Cost Containment Solutions 1,152.59 Workers Comp.Services 28278 County Wholesale Electric Co. 842.98 Eleclncal Supplies 28279 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 28280 CCP Industries 88571 Janitorial Supplies 28281 Confidential Mgt.Services,Inc. 764.21 Investigation Service 28282 CR&R, Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 28283 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. 1,D50.00 Lab Analysis Page 2 of 9 .. Claims Paid From 6116/00 to 6130/00 ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28284 Computational Systems,Inc. (CSI) 800.00 Vibration Analysis Service 28285 CWEA-TCP 30.00 Membership 28286 David's Tree Service 925.00 Tree Maint.Service 28287 Del Mar Analytical 2,228.00 Biosolids Analysis 28288 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 12.383.71 Dell Server 28289 Digilec Corp 373.76 Printer Maint. 28290 Don Maurer 3,920.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 28291 DGA Consultants,Inc 9,O8D00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 28292 DTSC(Dept.of Toxic Substances Con"Q 7.50 Hazardous Waste Fee 28293 Electra-Bond 4,773.33 Fusion Bonded Epoxy Coating Service 28294 Electric Machinery Dresser Rand Company 389.14 Electrical Supplies 26295 En Pointe Technologies 5,884.23 Computer Supplies 28296 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 28297 IRD Mechanalysis 1,040.82 Instrument Equipment Maint. 28298 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 943.70 Lab Supplies 28289 EquipCo 127.70 Instrument Mainl. 28300 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. 534.22 Maim.Service Agreement 28301 FedEx Corporation SW.63 Air Freight 28302 Flbenron 293.41 Fiber Optic Cable 28303 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription 28304 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 110.80 Lab Supplies 28305 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 242.00 Concrete Cutting 28306 Forts Benefits Insurance Company 17.843.41 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 28307 Fountain Valley Camera 180.59 Photo Supplies 28308 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 157.16 Paint Supplies 28309 Fry's Electronics 208.98 Computer Supplies 28310 Fan Sales and Services 946.90 Air Purifiers 28311 FM International, Inc. 4,082.54 Professional Services J-25-1 28312 Ganahl Lumber Company 674.71 Lumber/Hardware 28313 GanaB-Callshen Company 5.408.84 Chemicals 28314 GTE California 957.69 Telephone Services 28315 Glerlich-Mitchell, Inc. 1,579.63 Bell,Filter Press Supplies 28316 Grafix Training 3 Consulting 3,138.75 Training Registration 28317 Graphic Distributors 2,305.85 Photographic Supplies 28318 Gas Consumer Service 137.08 Lab Supplies 28319 Hach Company 596.46 Lab Supplies 28320 Herold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 28321 Harrington Industrial Plastics, I= 20.01 Plumbing Supplies 28322 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 2,161.59 Engine Generator Control Supplies 28323 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 80.05 Catering Services 26324 HIM, Inc. 4,457.58 Tools 28326 The Holman Group 1,408.64 Employee Assistance Program Premium 28326 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 7,613.81 Engineering Services 241 28327 Home Depot 556.93 Small Hardware Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 6116/00 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28328 Horizon Technology 170.00 lab Supplies 28329 Hub Auto Supply 60.48 Truck Parts 28330 HI Standard Automotive 559.88 Automotive Supplies 28331 Iclus Consulting,L.L.C. 9,645.00 Records Management Program 28332 Industrial Air Compressor 935.44 Compressor Supplies 28333 Infinity Technology USA 355.58 Office Supplies 28334 Information Resources 200.00 Human Resources Service 28335 Interstate Battery Systems 434.93 Batteries 28335 Intuitive Technology Corporation 6,270.00 Software MainL Agreement 28337 Irvine Ranch Water District 70.60 Water Use 28335 ITT Industries 3,147.11 Mechanical Pegs&Supplies 28339 J E Meinhard Associates 792.58 Lab Supplies 28340 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 524.52 Instrument Supplies 28341 Jay's Catering 1,325.96 Catering Services 28342 Johnstone Supply 241.87 Electrical Supplies 28343 Kelly Paper 114.75 Paper 28344 Knox Industrial Supplies 4.123.54 Tools 28345 Lab Support 4,365.19 Temporary Employment Services 28346 Lexis-Nexis 77.80 Books&Publications 28347 Gerald R.Jones 4,316.57 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 28348 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc 5,781.38 Architectural Services 28349 Luccl's 71.50 Meeting Expense 28350 M.J. Schiff&Associates,Inc. 813.95 Professional Services-Corrosion 28351 Manley's Boller Repair Company, Inc. 15,795.85 Mechanical Supplies&Boiler Repair 28352 MarVac Electronics 38.10 Instrument Supplies 28353 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,371.07 Tools 28354 Measurement Variables,I= 736.67 Electrical Supplies 28356 Mid-West Associates 12.766.57 Pump Supplies 28M Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 9,096.88 Mechanical Equipment Maint. 28357 Mission Uniform Service 5,192.04 Uniform Rentals 28358 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 28359 MonstecCom 276.00 Notices&Ads 28360 Montgomery Watson 11,858.51 Professional Service-Wastewater Analysis 28361 MotoPhoto 117.23 Photographic Services 28362 Management Action Programs, Inc. 1,100.00 Training Registration 28363 MSA Instrument Division 278.18 Safety Supplies 28364 National Microcomp Services 1,268.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 28365 Greater L.A.Chapter Nrul Safety Cncl. 2.222.86 Software 28366 Neal Supply Co. 63.84 Plumbing Supplies 28357 New Hermes, Inc. 385.01 Tools 28368 Newark Electronics 214.39 Instrument Supplies 28369 Nicholas Chevrolet 7.02 Vehicle Repairs 28370 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 412.18 Lubdcan9Diesel Fuel 28371 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 7,354.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 6/16100 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28372 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,593.25 Office Supplies 28373 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 360.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28374 Operation Technology,Inc 2,055.87 Software Maint. 28375 Orange County Health Care Agency 280.00 Underground Storage Tank fee 28376 Oxygen Service Company 2.883.12 Specialty Gases 28377 OCB Reprographics 4.621.32 Printing Service-Spec P-173 28378 Pacific Bell 1.085.58 Telephone Services 28379 Pacific Mechanical Supply 4,39&96 Plumbing Supplies 28380 Padfic Parts and Controls,Inc. 1.703.47 Electrical Supplies 28381 Pagenet 2,388.52 Paging Services 28362 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 226.04 Mechanical Supplies 28383 Parker Supply Company 7,933.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28384 Parts Unlimited 266.16 Truck Supplies 28385 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 721.93 Janitorial Supplies 28386 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 17,034.75 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 28387 Power Measurement Limited 10.204.86 Professional Service-Software 28388 Prexair,Inc. 1,450.27 Lab Supplies 28389 Cambddge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin. 28390 Projects Partners 14,700.00 Temporary Employment Services 28391 Hagman Southwest Corporation 1,253.17 Sauter Cleaning-Revenue Area 7 28392 PCS Express 74.27 Courier Service 28393 Ouanterca Environmental Services 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 28394 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 6,258.90 Instrument Supplies 28395 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 28396 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2.393.48 Trash Removal 28397 Red Wing Shoes 128.44 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 28398 Reliastar 18.295.87 Employee Medical Health Premium 28399 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,309.46 Life Insurance Premium 28400 Ruiz Engineering 4,050.00 Manhole Repair 6.5 28401 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulics 2,805.27 Motor Supplies 28402 RPM Electric Motors 75.43 Motor Supplies 28403 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 12,400.00 Construction-Manhole Rehab. 28404 Sclwdng America,Inc. 2.564.68 Pump Supplies 28405 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,085.05 Specialty Gases 28406 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 4,927.50 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 28407 Second-Sun 646.60 Light Fixtures 28408 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,779.99 Tools/Hardware 28409 So.Cal.Gas Company 21.73 Natural Gas 28410 So.Calif.Waste Mgmnt Forum 25.00 Training Registration 28411 South Coast Environmental Co. 2,168.36 Scrubber Emissions Testing Service 28412 Southern California Air Cord.Dist 138.09 Electrical Supplies 28413 Southern California Edison 61.91 Power 28414 Stale Chemical Mfg.Co. 536.03 Janitors[Supplies 26416 Sterling Art 40.54 Art Supplies Page 5 of 9 Claims Pall From 6116100 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28416 Strata Intemafional,Inc. 1.632.44 Chemicals 28417 Strictly Executive Portraits 48.49 Photos 28418 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 1.470.00 Landscape Maint. 28419 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,784.41 Mechanical Supplies 28420 Superintendent of Documents 98.00 Publication 28421 Teamwodd Corporate Programs 150.81 Tools 28422 The Orange County Register 1,118.50 Notices&Ads 28423 ThennoQuest Corporation 636.51 Lab Supplies 28424 Thomas Brothers Maps 9,923.78 Software maint. 28425 Thomas M.Dawes 340.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 28426 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 5,516.88 Mechanical Supplies 28427 Daily Pilot 350.00 Notices&Ads 28428 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 497.31 Locks&Keys 28429 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 458.61 Truck Supplies 28430 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 668.00 Lab Services 29431 Teksystems 7,186.80 Temporary Employment Services 28432 TPC Training Systems,Inc. 318.28 Publicafion 28433 U.S.Filler Corporation 1.282.75 Service Agreement 28434 Ultra Scientific 116.52 Lab Supplies 28435 The Unisource Corporation 145.10 Office Supplies 28436 United Parcel Service 897.77 Parcel Services 28437 Valley Cities Supply Company 898.80 Plumbing Supplies 28438 Veme's Plumbing 1,620.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 28439 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,315.36 Door Repair 28440 Vossler&Company 430.90 Mechanical Supplies 28441 Vulcan 22,289.34 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 28442 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8,458.60 Lab Supplies 28443 The Wackenhut Corporation 5.915.53 Security Guards 28444 Water Environment Federation 700.00 Training Registration 28445 Weftec2000 2,160.00 Registration 28446 Warner Process Equipment 5,768.00 Pump Supplies 28447 Western States Chemical, Inc. 15.483.23 Causdc Soda MO 8-23-95 28448 Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 28449 WEF-Registration Dept. 550.00 Registration 28450 Xerox Corporation 5,781.09 Copier Leases 28451 Zymark Corporation 7.519.17 Lab Supplies 28452 Thomas M.Flanagan 1,383.51 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 28453 Darius Ghazi 241.13 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 28454 Warren S.Hawkins 481.96 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimb. 28455 Dean R. Karats 488.07 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 28455 Jay S. Kaura 164.95 Meedng/Training Expense Reimb. 28457 Clance M. Martin 364.20 MeetingTraining Expense Reimb. 28458 Edward M.Torres 503.38 MeetingRraming Expense Reimb. 28459 Tadeo G.Vitko 404.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. Page 6 of 9 •- Claims Paid From 6/16100 to 6/30100 • ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28460 Michael D.While 1,435.47 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 28461 James L.Wybenga 638.94 Meelmg/Training Expense Reimb. 28462 Orange County Sanitation District 445.23 Petry Cash Reimb. 28463 Tim Avery and Dell Computers 2.912.40 Employee Computer Loan Program 28464 Weftec 200D 2,340.00 Registration 28465 Ark Construction Company 95.422.90 Construction PI-444 28466 Blue Cross of California 160.478.59 Medical Insurance Premium 28467 Delta Dental 41,178.64 Dental Insurance Plan 28468 DOB Engineering, Inc. 37,282.00 Temporary Employment Services 28469 Orange County Sanitation District 418,885.75 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 28470 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 72.562.47 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 28471 Projects Partners 32,055.35 Temporary Employment Services 28472 Southern California Edison 50,433.22 Power 28473 Woodruff.Spradlin 8 Smart 80.370.88 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 28474 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 3,106.30 Safely Supplies 28475 Allied Packing 8 Rubber,Inc. 177.60 Mechanical Supplies 28476 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 305.93 Plaques 28477 APEX Communications 2.090.34 Security Computer Equipment 28478 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 92.38 Telephone Service 28479 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 28480 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 28481 Business Week 82.95 Publication 26482 Clean Water Report 201.00 Publication 28483 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 28484 Consolidated Elect, Distributors,Inc. 972.85 Electrical Supplies 28485 Consolidated Reprographics 78.71 Printing Services 28486 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 48.65 Plumbing Supplies 28487 Cronatron Welding Systems, Inc. 255.33 Welding Supplies 25488 Cylec Industries 15,079.50 Anionic Polymer Spec, No.9798-18 28489 Davids Tree Service 1,425.00 Tree Maint.Service 28490 Del Mar Analytical 167.00 Biosolids Analysis 28491 Department of Toxic Substances Control 815.00 Hazardous Waste Fees 28492 Diamond H Recognition 1.697.95 Employee Service Awards 28493 Environmental Resource Center 2,195.00 Training Registration 28494 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 28495 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 17,815.15 Long Tenn Disability Ins.Premium 28496 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 28497 Game-Callanan Company 5.822.54 Chemicals 28498 GTE California 90.74 Telephone Services 28499 City of Huntington Beach 16,178.61 Water Use 28500 Industrial Metal Supply 761.98 Metal 28501 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,373.76 Dues Deduction 28502 ISI Inc. 2.132.00 Software Malnt- 28503 Jay's Catering 201.21 Catering Services Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 6/16/00 to 6/30/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28504 Jobs Available, Inc. 395.60 Notices&Ads 28505 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,886.16 Medical Insurance Premium 28506 Knotfs Berry Fenn 170.50 Employee Deposit Transfer 28507 Maintenance Technology Corp. 178.11 Mechanical Supplies 28508 Mamce International 693.51 Janitorial Supplies 28509 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 792.04 Tools 28510 Mac Analytical System 3,375.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 28511 Mad-Tox,Inc 275.00 Training Registration 28512 Management Action Programs, Inc. 1.100.00 Training Registration 28513 City of Newport Beach 165.98 Water Use 28514 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 492.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28515 Orange County Family Support 473.50 Wage Garnishment 28518 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 28517 Omdr,Herrington&Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Service-Bond Counsel 28518 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 28519 Pacific Bell 56.57 Telephone Services 28520 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 28521 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 28522 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 28523 Pickens Fuel Corp. 120.00 Professional Service-CNG Program 28624 Postmaster 97.00 Post Office Box Rental 28525 Primedia Information, Inc. 77.89 Publication 28526 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 121.88 Instrument Supplies 28527 Sage Publications, Inc. 25.00 Publication 28528 City of Seal Beach 188.81 Water Use 28529 Seal-It 450.00 Paving 28530 Shureluck Saks&Engineering 1,052.49 Tools/Hardware 28531 Simon, Larsen&Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Dairy Producers Transfer 28532 SoftView Computer Products 92.68 Computer Supplies 28533 SoftChoice 2,444.39 Software 28634 Superintendent of Documents 27.00 Publication 28535 SAWPA 10,000.00 Nitrogen/TDS Study,Phase 2B Support 28M Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 6.827.15 Mechanical Supplies 28537 The Uniscurce Corporation 1,298.75 Office Supplies 285M United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 28539 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.297.48 Vision Service Premium 28640 VPPPA 325.00 Training Registration 28541 Waf1ec 2000 2,970.00 Registration 28542 Layne T.Baroldi 432,44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28543 Bradley H.Cagle 1,247.T7 Meeting/Training Expense RMmb. 28544 Danny L. Dillon 397.74 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimb. 28545 Mark A. Esquer 483.60 Meetingri'mming Expense Reimb. 28546 Robert P.Ghirelli 1,253.14 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28647 Ingrid G. Hellebrand 183.75 MeetIngri-raining Expense Reimb. Page 8of9 - Claims Paid From 61111 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28548 Shamshad Hyder 115.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28549 Dionne Kardos 1,001.45 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 28550 William J.Lloyd 1,462.10 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 28551 Robert J.Taylor 1.609.60 Meeting/Training Expense Relmb. 28552 Daniel R.Tremblay 138.04 Meeting/Training Expense Relmb, 28553 Mortis C.Ying 148.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28554 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 4,245.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 28555 ESRI,Inc. 395.00 Meeting Registration 28556 Orange County Fire Authority 722.00 Professional Service-Demonstration Study J-71.4 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7.047.983.52 Payroll Disbursements 19484-19613 Employee Paychecks 164,607.30 Biweekly Payroll 6/28/00 19614-19615 Employee Paychecks 1,145.69 Adjustments 50531 -50976 Direct Deposit Statements 688,072.59 Biweekly Payroll 628/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 853,825.58 Total Claims Paid 6116/0 0-613010 0 $ 7.901,789,10 Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid From 6116100 to 6130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28548 Shammed Hyder 115.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26549 Dionne Kardos 1,001.45 MeetingrTralning Expense Reimb. 28560 William J. Lloyd 1,462.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28551 Robert J.Taylor 1,609.60 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 28552 Daniel R.Tremblay 138.04 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb. 28553 Morris C.Ying 148.08 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb. 28554 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 4.245.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 28555 ESRI, Inc. 395.00 Meeting Registration 26556 Orange County Fire Authority 722.00 Professional Service-Demonstration Study J-714 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,047,963.52 Payroll Disbursements 19484-19613 Employee Paychecks 164.607.30 Biweekly Payroll 628/00 19614-19615 Employee Paychecks 1.145.69 Adjustments 50531 -50976 Direct Deposit Statements 688,072.59 Biweekly Payroll 628/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 853,825.58 Total Claims Paid 6116100.6130/00 $ 7,901,789.10 Page 9 of 9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Da a F-&I.of Dr. B/73/Og AGENDA REPORT 1� Numbe I umber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A 1YebtlalBt4xp �abEaeKPFlE51tlsNN�EM a..vw. sanve Page 1 f — ATTACHMENTS r 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 7/1/00 -- 7/15/00 & 7/16/00 — 7/31/00. BA %VudwWWalwp dWnW@ iWldW FRESLlmapald dm R.x. fiIi690 Page 2 s-� Claims Paid From 711100 to 7115= 1 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 28557 Blue Cross of California $ 27,705.88 Medical Insurance Premium 28558 Carollo Engineers 38,587.94 Engineering Services P2-66 28559 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 336,911.05 10 Computers,7 Servers, 1 Disk Storage Controller, 2 Tape Drives&Comp.Racks 28560 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 38.648.31 Misc Construction Services-Sewer Repair&Confined Space Addition 28561 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 38,947.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 28562 Network Catalyst,Inc 49,000.00 Maint Agrmt.-IT Network Operational Readiness Assessment 28563 Orange County Water District 373,500.50 Consulting Service-Ground Water Replenishment 28564 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 263,356.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 28565 Projects Partners 47,983.80 Temporary Employment Services 28566 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 66.941.90 Sewer Cleaning-Revenue Areal 28557 Tule RanchrMagan Famrs 87.335.54 Residuals Removal NO 3-29.95 28568 The Yakima Company 49.507.63 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 28M Margate Construction, Inc. 480,070.00 Construction P2J9 28570 Southern Contracting Company 29,513.00 Construction P247-1 28571 A-Plus Systems 5,396.95 Notices&Ads 28572 Great American Printing Co. 1,958.46 Office Supplies 28573 Air Products&Chemicals 23,800.70 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89 28574 Airborne Express 119.73 Air Freight 28575 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 29.89 Safety Supplies 28576 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 1,6W.00 Human Resources Service 28577 American Management Association 1,005.00 Registration 28578 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 615.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 28579 Appleone Employment Service 745.20 Temporary Employment Services 28580 Applied Industrial Technology 73.51 Electncal Pans&Supplies _ 28581 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 552.00 Vacuum Truck Services 28582 Artistic Blinds 302.87 Office Supplies 28583 Asbury Environmental Services 115.00 Waste Oil Removal 28584 Associated Vacuum Tech., Inc 129.08 Filter 28585 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement 28586 Awards&Tmphies By Bea 24.24 Plaques 28587 AMSA 50.00 Publication 28568 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security Equipment Maint 28589 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 33.16 Telephone Service 28590 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,199.08 Long Distance Telephone Service 28591 AT&T Wireless Services 5,421.97 Cellular Telephone Service 28592 AT&T Wireless Services 130.44 Cellular Telephone Service 28593 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 28594 Bar Tech Telecom,Ina. 3,194.88 Telephone Equipment Service 28595 Battery Specialties 1,242.05 Batteries 28595 Behavioral Safety Now Conference 544.00 Training Registration 28597 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 102.37 Valve Supplies 28598 Boyle Engineering Corporation 6,399.81 Engineering Services 7-23.1 28599 Bristol Systems,Inc. 4,500.00 Consulting Services-Integrated Emergency Response Plan Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 7/1100 to 7/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28600 Bush&Associates,Inc. 1,196.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 28601 Calif Centrifugal Pump 6,868.14 Pump Supplies 28602 California Auto Collision 1,269.41 Truck Repair 28603 California Automatic Gate 1,037.37 Service Agreement 28604 California Relocation Services, Inc. 1,294.69 Office Moving Services 28WS Caltrol,Inc. 29.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28606 Cambridge Isotope Labs 333.32 Lab Supplies 28607 Canus Corporation 225.37 Electrical Supplies 28608 Charles P.Crowley Co. 114.85 Instrument Parts 28609 Claim Jumper Restaurant 100.00 Fair Volunteer Recognition Luncheon Expense 28610 ClarkUft of California,Inc. 159.09 Forklift Repair 28611 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 12,710.00 Professional Sew.- SARI Gate Operating Procedures&HkFlow Response Plan 28612 Consolidated Elect, Distributors, Inc. 3,869.41 Electrical Supplies 28613 Consolidated Waste Industries 2.324.57 Contract Services-Hazardous Waste Disposal 28614 Converse Consultants 1,018.00 Consulting Service P2.60 28615 Cook Brothers 631.10 Pump Supplies 28616 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 28617 Corporate Express 2,777.16 Office Supplies 26618 Cost Containment Solutions 656.88 Workefs Comp.Services 28619 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,469.22 Electrical Supplies 28620 CASA 500.00 Conference Registration 28621 CCP Industries 9,226.10 Janitorial Supplies 28622 CEPA Company 1,025.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 28623 CHMIA 50.00 Membership 28624 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 2,611.00 CCTV Sewer Inspection 28625 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis 28626 DeZudk CIO Misco/SouthWest 1,036.71 Valves 28627 Diamond H Recognition 345.92 Employee Service Awards 28628 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 819.03 Paint Supplies 28629 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 170.00 Medical Screening 286M Embarcedero Technologies,Inc. 3.017.00 Software Maint.Agreement 28631 En Pointe Technologies 5,796.87 Computer Supplies 28632 Enchanter, Inc. 2,8W.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 28633 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.039.99 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 28634 FedFx Corporation 220.52 Air Freight 28M Filter Supply Company 279.67 Filters 28636 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 180.40 Lab Supplies 28637 Fountain Valley Camera 36.95 Photo Supplies 28638 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 488.50 Truck Wash Tickets 28639 Franklin Covey 106.89 Office Supplies 28640 Fry's Electronics 775.72 Computer Supplies 28641 Ganahl Lumber Company 15.85 Lumber/Hardware 28642 GTE California 1.579.32 Telephone Services 28643 George Yardley Co. 270.37 Lab Supplies Page 2 of 7 i b Claims Paid From 711/00 to 7115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28W Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 2,288.36 Bell,Filler Press Supplies 28645 Governmental Accounting Bids. Board 100.00 Publication 28646 WW Grainger,Inc. 2.735.85 Compressor Supplies 28647 Graybar Electric Company 2.322.99 Electrical Supplies 28648 Great Westem Sanitary Supplies 940.58 Janitorial Supplies 28649 Haaker Equipment Company 337.90 Truck Supplies 28650 Hach Company 30.78 Lab Supplies 28651 Harbour Engineering Group 10,731.57 Pump Supplies 28652 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 253.05 Plumbing Supplies 28653 Hello Direct,Inc. - 243.04 Telephone Headsets 28554 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 6 Deli 13850 Catering Services 28665 Hilti,Inc. 178.15 Tools 28656 Home Depot 677.78 Small Hardware 28657 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 7,302.50 Records Management Program 28658 Idexx 3,879.00 Lab Supplies 28659 Industrial Metal Supply 254.81 Metal 28660 Intelligence Press, Inc. 9W.00 Publication 28661 Irvine Ranch Water District 2.90 Water Use 28662 IOMA's Salary Surveys 237.95 Publication 28663 Jays Catering 443.58 Catering Services 28664 Jim's Suspension Service 90.15 Truck Repairs 28665 Johnstone Supply 264.25 Electrical Supplies 28666 K S.Dunbar 8 Associates 7.250.00 Engineering Services 241 28687 K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 4.750.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 28668 Kars Advance Materials, Inc. 2.731.25 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 28669 Kerry Consulting Group 3.353.14 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 28670 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,199.11 Tools 28671 Lab Support 4,337.83 Temporary Employment Services 28672 League Of CA Cities 40.00 Publication 28673 Gerald R.Jones 4,450.99 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 20674 Long Beach Iron Works 6.485.00 Manhole Covers 28675 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,6W.00 Architectural Services 28676 Lucds 144.60 Meeting Expense 28677 Mandic Motors 65.00 Towing Services 28678 Manley's Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 2,900.00 Mechanical Supplies 28679 MarVac Electronics 84.D5 Instrument Supplies 28680 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 23.28 Tools 28681 Mec Analytical System 4.120.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 28682 Mission Uniform Service 4,888.62 Uniform Rentals 28M Mobile Hose B Hydraulic Supply 1,498.82 Pump Supplies 28684 Mouse Graphics 39.87 Printing Services 28685 NatWest Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 28686 National Fire Protection 509.44 Publication 2W87 National Plant Services,Inc. 1,050.00 Vacuum Truck Services Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 711100 to 71116I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28888 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 4,825.00 Training Registration 28689 City of Newport Beach 11.37 Water Use 28890 Hickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 24,370.14 Lubricent0lesel Fuel 28691 The Norco Companies 144.78 Mail Delivery Service 28692 NETSOL/Network Solution 4,900.00 Engineering Services-Communication System Improvements 28693 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,195.34 Office Supplies 28694 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 132.17 Electrcal Pans 8 Supplies 28695 Orange Valve 8 Filling Company 1,013.27 Fittings 28696 Oxygen Service Company 1,328.43 Specialty Gases 28697 DOB Reprographics 568.15 Printing Service-Spec P-173 28698 P.L.Hewn Company,Inc. 1,857.93 Electrical Supplies 28899 Pacific Bell 16.07 Telephone Services 28700 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,891.90 Plumbing Supplies 28701 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 886.31 Janitorial Supplies 28702 Petra Environmental Division 10.610.32 Biosolids Investigation in King County 28703 Power Design BU BB Electrical Supplies 28704 Presentation Products, Inc. 907.31 Computer Equip. Maint Service 28705 Primary Source 16,716.47 Office Furniture 28708 PCS Express 89.26 Courier Service 28707 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 28708 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4.000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 28709 Red Wing Shoes 164.64 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 28710 Robert"Auto Trim Shop 682.36 Auto Repair 28711 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems, Inc 8,635.02 Electrical Supplies 28712 RM Controls 458.44 Instrument Supplies 28713 RPM Electric Motors 340.88 Electric Motor Repair 28714 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 915.00 Lab Equipment Parts 8 Service 28715 Second-Sun 1,112.52 Light Fixtures 28716 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 5,222.36 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 28717 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 923.39 Tools/Hardware 28718 Sloan Electric Company 7,140.03 Motor Repairs 28719 Southern California Edison 8.148.81 Power 28720 Southern California Water 82AS Water Use 28721 Sparkletts 2.010.94 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 28722 Spex Conprep,Inc. 742.79 Lab Supplies 28723 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc. 656.00 Painting Service 28724 Summit Steel 3,348.13 Metal 28725 Sunset Industrial Parts 387.18 Mechanical Supplies 28728 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 28727 Tetra Tech,Inc. 2,947.87 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 28728 The Memwood Corporation 6,116.50 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 28729 ThennoOuest Corporation 78.78 Lab Supplies 28730 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 10,400.70 Mechanical Supplies 28731 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance Page 4 of 7 b Claims Paid From 7M100 to 7116/00 . Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28732 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 28733 Top Hal Productions 123.37 Catering Services 28734 The Trans Company 144.97 Electrical Supplies 28735 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 16,878.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 28736 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 1.011.75 Truck Supplies 28737 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 300.00 Lab Services 28738 Two Wheels One Planet 1,040.54 Bicycle Supplies 28739 TCH Associates, Inc. 4,521.34 lab Supplies 28740 Teksystems 2,395.20 Temporary Employment Services 28741 Unistrut Los Angeles 1.150.83 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28742 United Parcel Service 26.50 Parcel Services 28743 US Filter/Envirex 363.42 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28744 Valley Cities Supply Company 236.62 Plumbing Supplies 28745 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 3,000.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Project 28746 Vector Resources 1.666.24 Vohxt/Dats Communication Services 28747 Victor Buick-GMC Truck 21,968.66 2000 GMC Truck w/8 It Utility Bed 28748 WJR Scientific Products Corporation 3.809.29 Dab Supplies 28749 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,153.56 Security Guards 26750 Walker Brothers Machinery Moving,Inc. 12,607.00 Equipment Moving Service 28751 Water Environment Federation 81.75 Publication 28752 Wdeg Scientific 133.30 Lab Supplies 28753 Wyatt Data Services 299.00 Publication 28754 WEF Publications 76.75 Publication 28755 Xerox Corporation 14,408.50 Copier Leases 28756 Joven E.Alop 1,028.41 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimb. 28757 Victor M.Ferguson 1,293.71 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 28758 Voided Check - - 28759 Vladimir A Kogan 622.49 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 28780 Robert Dolan 610.48 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 28761 Knods Berry Fan 1,457.75 Employee Deposit Transfer 28782 Orange County Sanitation District 1.732.78 Petty Cash Reimb. 28783 Orange County Sanitation District 409,902.03 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 28764 Airgas Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 12.87 Safety Supplies 28765 AhMed, Inc. 557.35 Computer Supplies 28766 American Airlines 7.327.68 Travel Services 28767 American Management Association International. 1,395.00 Training Registration 28768 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 140.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 28769 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 15.71 Telephone Service 28770 Beckman Coulter,Inc. 1,299.00 Instrument Maint. Service 28771 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 2ST72 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 28773 CWEA-Membership 55.00 Membership 28774 Court Order 160.00 Wage Gamishment 28776 CompuExcal Consulting 8 Software 7,271.65 Consulting Service-Software Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 7/1100 to 7116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28776 Consolidated Elect Distributors,Inc 1,109.55 Electrical Supplies 28777 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,116.47 Plumbing Supplies 28778 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 157.50 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 28779 Culligan Water Conditioning 58.19 Water Equipment Supplies 28780 CEM Corporation 600.58 Lab Supplies 28781 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 28782 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 28783 GTE California 5,696.95 Telephone Services 28784 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,369.21 Printing Service 28785 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.373.76 Dues Deduction 28786 Jordan Controls 812,04 Instrument Maim.Services 28787 Karen Monaco&Associates 3,000.00 FIS Support Services 28788 MSA Instrument Division 284.31 Instrument Main.Services 28789 Business Training 6 Development Services 2,217.36 Training Registration 28790 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 695.00 Training Registration 28791 Network Catalyst Inc. 613.70 Computer Supplies 28792 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 245.00 Training Registration 28793 Nicholas Natty 240.00 Legal Service-INS Processing 28794 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 192.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28795 Orange County Family Support 473.50 Wage Garnishment 28796 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 28797 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 440.14 Fillings 28798 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 28799 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 288M Parkhouse Tire Co. 605.59 Tires 28801 Court Order 296.D0 Wage Gamishment 28802 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 28803 Primary Source 1,180.28 Office Furniture 288N Richardson Engineering Services 1,197.00 Training Registration 28805 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 92.58 Paint Supplies 28805 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 159.45 Tools 28807 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 2,628.23 Tools/Hardware 28808 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-SARWG 831,000 Chino Basin Transfer 28809 So.Cal. Gas Company 22.160.72 Natural Gas 28810 Southern California Edison 2,743.14 Power 28811 State Board of Equalization 16,322.54 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 8 Sales Tax Return 28812 Summit Steel 784.58 Metal 28813 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 7,928.12 Landscape Maint 28814 SCAP 24.000.00 Membership-So.Calif.Alliance of POTW 28815 TCH Associates, Inc. 124.83 Lab Supplies 28816 Undersea Graphics, Inc. 1,000.00 Contract Service-OuHell Inspection 28817 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions - 28818 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 300.00 Membership 28819 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 6.025.00 Consulting services-Web Programming Page 6 of 7 G Claims Paid From 711100 to 7115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28820 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 148.63 Lab Supplies 28821 Xerox Corporation 1,304.13 Copier Lessee 28822 Marc A.Brown 385.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 28823 James L. Bunor 300.85 MmUngrTralning Expense Reimb. 28824 Randy E.Hams 168.29 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb. 28825 David R.Heinz 146.29 Meetingrimining Expense Reimb. 28826 Joseph W.Park,Jr. 146.29 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimb. 28827 John W.Swindler 1,214.69 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 28828 Mahin Talebi 489.26 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 28829 Robed J.Thistle 982.19 Meefing/Training Expense Reimb. 28830 Jonathan K.Thomsic 377.45 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. 28831 Lisa L.Tomko 669.41 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimb. 28832 Mark S.Boyd 1.229.48 Employee Computer Loan Program 28833 City of Fountain Valley 148.00 Permit Fee 28834 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 6.015.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 28835 Ed Ruzak 2,000.00 Legal Service Retainer-Vehicle 28836 Pacific Bell 242.39 Claim Settlement-Vehicle Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,940,028.01 Payroll Disbursements 19616-19752 Employee Paychecks 163.067.23 Biweekly Payroll 7/12100 19753-19755 Employee Paychecks 1,527.34 Termination 8 Adjustments 50977-51428 Direct Deposit Statements 664.526.94 Biweekly Payroll 7112/00 Total Payroll Disbursements S 829.121.51 Win Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 145.581.44 June Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas Nabonal Association 280,170.20 June Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Co. 242,678.32 June Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 688.429.96 Total Claims Paid 711100-711510 0 $ 4,437,579.48 Page 7 of 7 Ciahrrs Paid From 7116100 to 7131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 28837 Ark Construction Company $ 43,000.00 Construction-HR Bldg.Office Modifn. 28838 Aztec Supply Company 52.059.53 Construction-Mezzanine Addition Q Maint.Shop 28839 Boyle Engineering Corporation 29,350.77 Engmeenng Service 3.38-1.7-27&Process Control Software Templates 28840 Brown&Caldwell 88,448.21 Engineering Service Pl-37 28641 Camillo Engineers 126,350.33 Engineering Service P143,P2-50,P2-68&J-254 28842 Computerized Facility Integration 153.614.50 Engineering Service J-25-1 28843 Delta Dental 47,014.28 Dental Insurance Plan 28844 Robert F.Driver Associates 164,473.00 Excess Liability,Boiler&Mach.&Crime Insurance MO 610-92 28845 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 29,355.98 Medical Insurance Premium 28846 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 115,550.30 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 28847 Lee&Ro, Inc. 25,005.48 Engineering Service P2-39, P2-47&J47-1 28848 NWRI National Water Research Institute 50.000.00 Membership 28549 Orange County Water District 45,742.50 GAP Water Use NO 10-23.96 28850 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 186.074.50 Engineering Services J42 28851 Poly Tyne, Inc. 57,062.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 28852 Tula RanclVMagan Fans 87,290.83 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 28853 Villa Ford 47,136.32 3 Ford Ranger EV Pickup Trucks-Lease Agreement 28854 Vulcan 00260.52 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 28955 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 158.317.73 Construction 3-38-1 28856 Ken Thompson, Inc. 563.197.92 Construction 11-17-3 28857 S.S.Mechanical Corp 59,387.70 Construction P46-2&J-53 28858 Union Bank of California 62,577.55 Construction 11-17-3,Retention 28859 Aearo Company 1,034.00 Satety Supplies 28860 Aidce Systems, Inc. 385.99 Fiber Optic Equipment 28861 Air liquids America Corp. 1,663.58 Specialty Gasses 28862 Airborne Express 48.16 Air Freight 28863 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety ON. 3,644.46 Safety Supplies 28864 AliMed,Inc. 1.164.58 Computer Supplies 28865 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 328.69 Mechanical Supplies 28866 Anixter, Inc. 200.58 Computer Supplies 28867 Appleone Employment Service 2,643.39 Temporary Employment Services 28868 Applied Indushtal Technology 351.83 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28869 Arcus Data Security 204.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 28870 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 974.10 Waste Removal 28871 Asbury Environmental Services 85.00 Waste Oil Removal 28872 Ashbrook Corporation 2,912.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28873 Asphalt Institute 206.00 Publication 28874 APEX Communications 2,102.25 Computer Supplies 28875 ASTD 150.00 Publication 28876 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 199.69 Telephone Service 28877 AT&T Wireless Services 2,396,75 Cellular Telephone Service 28878 Battery Specialties 885.45 Batteries 28879 Beach Paving,Inc. 925.00 Asphalt Repair Page 1 of 9 o - Claims Paid From 7116f00 to 7/31100 c Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28880 BioNleneux Vdek, Inc. 642.99 Lab Supplies 28881 Boise Radiator Service 55.00 Truk Repairs 28882 Boot Barn 102.35 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 28883 Bush 8 Associates,Inc. 3,480.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 28884 Cal-Glass, Inc 89.21 Lab Equipment Service 28885 Calif Centrifugal Pump 4.888.48 Pump Supplies 28886 Can R.Nelson,P.E. 2,350.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 28887 Chapman House,Inc. 3.300.00 Training Registration 28888 Charles P.Crowley Co. 17,116.11 Instrument Parts 28889 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 145.51 Lab Supplies 28890 Compressor Components Of California 247.83 Mechanical Pans B Supplies 28891 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 600.00 Computer Maint.Agreement 2BB92 Connell GM Parts 28.80 Truck Supplies 26893 Consolidated Elect. Distributor:,Inc. 9,606.93 Electrical Supplies 28894 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 265.85 Plumbing Supplies 28895 Contemporary Controls 6,985.70 Computer Supplies 28896 Converse Consultants 5,695.90 Consulting Services-Soil Testing 28897 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing 28898 Corporate Express Imaging 584.02 Computer Supplies 28899 Corporate Express 663.78 Office Supplies 2NW Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 13,070.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.989"9 28901 Cost Containment Solutions 726.02 Workers Comp.Services 28902 County of Orange 150.00 Easement Fee 28903 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 7.698.00 Underground Storage Haab Service Fee 28904 County Wholesale Electric Co. 113.46 Electrical Supplies 28905 Culligan of Orange County 32.85 Soft Water Service 28906 CEPA Company 230.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 28907 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 5,136.64 CCTV Sewer Inspection 28908 Computational Systems, Inc.(CS0 1,600.00 Vibration Analysis Service 28909 CSMFO 40.00 Seminar Registration 28910 Del Mar Analytical 886.00 Biosolids Analysis 28911 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 4,823.32 2 HP Printers 28912 Diamond H Recognition 500.84 Employee Service Awards 28913 Don Maurer 8.575.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 28914 DGA Consultants, Inc 1,296.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 28915 Ebedine Instruments 466.03 Instrument Maint 28916 Electra-Bond 1,697.07 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28917 En Pointe Technologies 397.60 Computer Supplies 28918 Enchanter, Inc. 4.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 28919 Enterprise Technology Services,L.L.C. 5,582.40 Consulting Services-FIS Support 28920 Environmental Analytical Service 1,748.63 Emission Analytical Service 28921 ESRI, Inc. 1,600.00 Training Registration 28922 FedEx Corporation 243.80 AV Freight 28923 Filter Supply Company 37.85 Filters Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116/00 to 7131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28924 Flo-Systems, Inc. 2.977.15 Pump Supplies 28925 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,811.49 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 28926 Fountain Valley Camera 154.13 Photo Supplies 28927 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 618.48 Truck Wash Tickets 28928 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 128.23 Paint Supplies 28929 Franklin Covey 55.28 Office Supplies 28930 Fry's Electronics 400.59 Computer Supplies 28931 FM International, Inc. 10,500.00 Professional Services-Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 28932 Ganahl Lumber Company 860.92 Lumber/Hardware 28933 Gantt-Callahan Company 2,932.53 Chemicals 28934 Gateway 77.88 Employment Medical Services 28935 GTE California 919.73 Telephone Services 28935 George T.Hall 1,461.35 Electrical Supplies 28937 Gelinge Castle 325.96 Lab Supplies 28938 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 13.355.02 Belt,Filler Press Supplies 28939 Goldak Inc. 900.00 Construction Service 546 28940 Goldemvesl Window Service 210.00 Wndow Cleaning Service 28941 WW Grainger,Inc. 4,347.88 Compressor Supplies 28942 Graphic Distributors 88.98 Photographic Supplies 28943 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 603.30 Janitorial Supplies 28944 GLI International,trio. 395.26 Instrument Supplies 28945 Haaker Equipment Company 2.678.94 Truck Supplies 28946 Hach Company 6,209.77 Lab Supplies 28947 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Ino. 181.86 Plumbing Supplies 2890 Heat Technology Products 1,796.18 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28049 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 188.66 Catering Services 28950 The Holman Group 708.58 Employee Assistance Program Premium 28951 Holmes 8 Newer,Ina 16,887.79 Engineering Service Pl444 28952 Home Depot 641.25 Small Hardware 28953 Horizon High Reach 4,800.00 Safety Compliance Training 28954 Hub Auto Supply 231.28 Truck Parts 28955 Ictus Consulting, L.L.C. 12,487.50 Records Management Program 28956 Imaging Plus, Inc. 8.25 Printing Service 28957 Industrial Metal Supply 1,747.79 Metal 28958 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 78.03 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 28959 Infinity Technology, USA 1.713.28 Office Supplies 28960 Information Resources 100.00 Human Resources Service 28961 Interstate Battery Systems 684.63 Batteries 28962 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.64 Water Use 28963 IBM Corp. 8.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 28964 ISA Expo/2000 585.00 Registration 28965 J 8 B Auto Parts 45.06 Auto Parts 8 Supplies 28966 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 3,288.01 Instrument Supplies 28967 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 21,432.24 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series Page 3 of 9 0 Claims Paid From 7116/00 to 7/31100 < Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28968 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 15,727.35 Misc.Construction Service-Repair Barscreen 28969 Johnstone Supply 865.47 Electrical Supplies 28970 Jordan Controls 359.83 Instrument Maint.Services 28971 Karen Monaco&Associates 9,125.00 FIS Support Services 28972 Kars Advance Materials, Inc. 3,05260 Cen Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 28973 Kelly Paper 25.14 Paper 28974 Kerry Consulting Group 3,092.82 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 28975 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,567.25 Tools 28976 Krone,Inc. 103.12 Electncal Supplies 28977 Lab Support 6,066.92 Temporary Employment Services 28978 La Mode Chemical Products 13.33 Chemicals 28979 Gerald R.Jones 4,429.92 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 28980 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 1,768.15 Architectural Services 28981 Lucas 74.00 Meeting Expense 28982 Lustre-Cal 544.78 Computer Supplies 28983 Lytle Screen Printing 796.81 Printing Service 28984 M.J. Schiff&Associates, Inc. 3,526.16 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 28985 Maintenance Technology Corp. 353.97 Mechanical Supplies 289M Management Action Programs, Inc. 7,800.00 Training Registration 28987 MarVac Electronics 8208. Instrument Supplies 28988 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch W9.28 Plumbing Supplies 28989 McBain Instruments 490.00 Lab Supplies 28990 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 534.58 Tads 28991 Menam Instruments C/O Patten Corp. 436.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28992 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4.994.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28993 Mission Uniform Service 2,593.38 Uniform Rentals 28994 Monitor Labs,Ina 3,384.90 Instrument Maint. 28995 Montgomery Watson 2,147.20 Professional Service-Emission Modeling&Analysis 289% Moreland&Associates 8,270.50 Auditing Services MO 341-95 28997 Morton Salt 740.47 Salt 28998 MSA-C/O Geoff Cobbett 380.00 Membership 28999 MTA US&C 410.00 Meeting Registration 29D00 National Microcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 29001 Neal Supply Co. 675.12 Plumbing Supplies 29002 Network Catalyst,Inc. 1,538.20 Computer Supplies 29003 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 2,094.00 Training Registration 290D4 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 4,807.76 Lubdwnt/Diesel Fuel 29005 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 8,112,75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 29006 NETSOUNetwork Solution 8.000.00 Engineering Services-Security System Improvements 29007 Office Depot Business Services Div. 868.08 Office Supplies 29008 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 81.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 29009 Orange County Sanitation District 23,375.36 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 29010 Oxygen Senace Company 3.054.02 Specialty Gases 29011 OCB Reprographics 5,341.36 Printing Service-Spec P-173 Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116100 to 7131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 29012 OCE-USA,Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 29013 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 2.362.18 Electrical Supplies 29014 Pacific Bell 99.31 Telephone Services 29015 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 29016 Pacific Decorating Centers 3,122.00 Tile Installation-Maint Bldg 29017 Pacific Mechanical Supply 371.54 Plumbing Supplies 29018 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 6,086.65 Electrical Supplies 29019 Pagenet 2,432,00 Paging Services 29020 Parker Supply Company 5,366.94 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 29021 Parts Unlimited 774.39 Truck Supplies 29022 Pead Art 8 Craft 45.71 Art 8 Graphic Supplies 29023 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 302.59 Lab Supplies 29024 Pmey Bowes 385.28 Postage Machine Service Agreement 29025 Hach cro Ponton Industries 1,216.03 Lab Supplies 29026 Primary Source 1.017.34 Office Furniture 29027 Pump Engineering Wor Q Air 2,044.44 Pump Supplies 29028 Quantena Environmental Services 2,758.00 Lab Analytical Service 29029 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2.393.48 Trash Removal 29030 R.A.Reed Electric 5,494.51 Motor Overhaul 29031 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems,Inc. 264.95 Electrical Supplies 29032 Ryon Herco Products Corp. 952.12 Pump Supplies 29033 RD Instruments - 421.07 Lab Equipment MO 5.28-97 29034 RMS Engineering 8 Design, Inc. 996.00 Engineering Service-Storage Tank Structural Evaluation 29036 RPM Electric Motors 2,626.12 Electric Motor Repair 29036 HIS Hughes Co,Inc. 68.82 Palm Supplies 29037 San Gabriel Valley Newspaper Group 3,30D.00 Publication 29038 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 57.80 Mechanical Supplies 29039 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 5.548.01 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 29040 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 157.58 Tools 29041 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 192.33 Tools/Hardware 29042 Supelco,Inc. 550.78 Lab Supplies 29043 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,129.57 Natural Gas 29044 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 3,444.28 Emission Fees 29045 Southern California Edison 16,387.64 Power 29046 Spading Inst.C/O Patten Corporate 3.077.10 Instrument Supplies 29047 Statoil Energy,Inc. 9,990.00 Can Gan Engines Overhaul 29048 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 624.36 Office Supplies 29049 Sun-Belt Landscape 8 Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 29050 Sunset Ford 43.89 Vehicle Supplies 29051 Sunset Industrial Parts 22.78 Mechanical Supplies 29052 Super Chem Corporation 1,208.80 Chemicals 29053 SKC-West,Inc. 860.08 Safety Supplies 29054 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 371.84 Electric Can Parts 29055 Techno Coatings 13.000.00 Painting Services-Surge Tower No.2 Page 5 of 9 m Claims Paid Prom 7118100 to 7131100 a Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 29D56 The Orange County Register 1.229.25 Notices&Ads 29057 Thermo Quest Institute 2,058.68 Lab Supplies 29058 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,335.61 Mechanical Supplies 29059 Traffic Control Service, Inc. 155.16 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 29060 The Trans Company 401.45 Electrical Supplies 29061 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 6.409.00 Lab Services 29062 Tustin Dodge 167.29 Truck Supplies 29063 Teksystems 100.0D Temporary Employment Services 29064 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 29065 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 29M United Parcel Service 301.90 Parcel Services 29067 Unocal 78 148.53 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38.1 Inspection 29068 US FilterlEnvirex 821.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 29069 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,494.11 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 29070 Valley Cities Supply Company 1.660.92 Plumbing Supplies 29071 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 58.30 Mechanical Supplies 29072 Valley Splicing Co. 1,450.00 Equipment Repair 29073 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 23,856.00 Consulting Service-Emission Monitoring&Web Programming 29074 Veme's Plumbing 535.W Plumbing Equipment Repair 29075 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,342.90 Vision Service Premium 29076 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,7W.45 Lab Supplies 29077 The Wackenhut Corporation 6.163.66 Security Guards 29078 Water Environment Federation 100.00 Registration 29079 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 7,570.06 Safety Supplies 29080 Western States Chemical,Inc. 12.322.34 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 29081 Xerox Corporation 5,564.36 Copier Leases 29082 The Yakima Company 22,240.94 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 29083 YCA 3,975.00 Training Registration-Project Success Method Seminar 29D84 Zymark Corporation 743.48 Lab Supplies 29085 Ark Construction Company 23,360.58 Construction J-55 29066 Union Bank of Celifomis 6,598.63 Construction P146s2&J-53,Retention 29087 Union Bank of California 8,33251 Construction 3-38-1,Retention 29D88 West-Tech Contracting,Inc. 7,965.00 Construction-Warehouse Demolition 28089 Blake Anderson 175.00 Meefing?reining Expense Reimb. 2W90 Lisa Arosteguy 607.31 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimb. 29091 Thomas M. Flanagan 510.97 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimb. 29092 Robert P.Ghirelli 148.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 29093 Douglas M.Stewart 540.00 Meefing/rmining Expense Reimb. 29094 Lisa L.Tomko 205.00 Meebng/fmining Expense Reimb. 2W95 City of Irvine 85.52 Permit Fee 29096 County of Orange 850.00 Pennit Fee 241 29097 James W.Silva 142.65 Meeting Expense Reimb. 29090 Airgas Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,188.81 Safety Supplies 29099 American Express 16.200.53 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116100 to 7131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 29100 Argo Electric Supply Co. 1,240.67 Electrical Equipment Service 29101 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. 974.10 Waste Removal 29102 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 393.97 Telephone Service 29103 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 14.66 Telephone Service 29104 Court Order 564.00 Wage Garnishment 29105 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 29108 California Relocation Services, Inc. 1,185.35 Office Moving Services 29107 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 6,626.72 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 29108 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 29109 Compliance Technology 93.61 Tools 29110 Compu Master 199.00 Training Registration 29111 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1.465.91 Electrical Supplies 29112 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 22.37 Plumbing Supplies 29113 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 29114 County Wholesale Electric Co. 437.96 Electrical Supplies 29115 Crane America Services,Inc. 2,500.OD Crane Services 29116 CR 8 R. Inc. 1.290.00 Container Rentals 29117 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 474.10 Software 29118 DOS Engineering,Inc. 7,938.00 Temporary Employment Services 29119 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 29120 Environmental Lab Accreditation Program 3,119.00 Lab Certification 29121 ESRI, Inc. 800.00 Training Registration 29122 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 29.37 Paint Supplies 29123 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 29124 Fry's Electronics 118.45 Computer Supplies 29125 Gastech 6,789.42 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 29126 GTE California 86.21 Telephone Services 29127 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 6,710.53 Belt,Filter Press Supplies 29128 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 29.00 Catering Services 29129 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmonary Mgmt 2.942.00 On-Site Pulmonary&Audiometric Testing 29130 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 29131 Irvine Ranch Water District 28.06 Water Use 29132 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc 998.00 Misc.Construction Service-Junction Box Modifn. 29133 Jay's Catering 750.48 Directors Meeting Expenses 29134 J2 Printing Services 699.30 Printing 29135 K.P.Undstrom, Inc. 6,000.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 29136 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 11.659.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 29137 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 140.61 Safety Supplies 29138 Lab Support 744.00 Temporary Employment Services 29139 Labware,Inc. 1,500.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 29140 La Motto Chemical Products 1,131.94 Chemicals 29141 Management Action Programs,Inc. 3,300.00 Training Registration 29142 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 121.30 Tools 29143 Mec Analytical System 775.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis Page 7 of e Claims Paid From 7/16/00 to 7/31/00 Wamrd No. Vendor Amount Description 29144 Michael's Stores, Inc. 32.43 Office Supplies 29145 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10.828.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 29146 MotoPhoto 130.63 Photographic Services 29147 National Plant Services,Inc. 825.00 Vacuum Truck Services 29148 Olive Oil Co. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 29149 Orange County Family Support 473.50 Wage Garnishment 29150 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 29151 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 764.67 Fittings 29152 OCB Reprographics 83.28 Printing Service-Spec P-173 29153 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 29154 Pacific Bell 1.040.67 Telephone Services 29155 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 29156 Parkhouse Tire Co. 176.93 Tires 29157 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 29158 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 29159 Pickens Fuel Corp. 2,552.92 Professional Service-CNG Program 29160 Primary Source 376.65 Office Furniture 29161 Projects Partners 11,769.92 Temporary Employment Services 29162 R.A.Reed Electric 5,494.51 Motor Overhaul 29163 RM Controls 33.98 Instrument Supplies 29164 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 48.29 Paint Supplies 29165 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1.146.72 Specialty Gases 29166 Shasta Electric LP 4,858.00 Construction Services-Install Alarm Beacons 29167 Shureluck Sales&Engineenng 233.88 Tools/Hardware .29168 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 1,OOD.00 Professional Service-Chino Basin Watermaster Transfer 29169 Skater.Inc. 8.211.29 Lab Supplies 29170 So.Cal. Gas Company 9.411.23 Natural Gas 29171 So9View Computer Products 2,218.16 Computer Supplies 29172 SoBChoice 9.695.96 Software 29173 Sparkletls 2,233.68 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 29174 State Board Of Equalization 1,050.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 29175 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 213.67 Office Supplies 29176 Super Power Products 193.95 Janitorial Supplies 29177 Tetra Tech,Inc. 9,385.82 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 29178 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis 29179 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 549.46 Mechanical Supplies 29100 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 8,249.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 29181 Teksystems 100.00 Temporary Employment Services 29182 The Unisource Corporation 78.78 Office Supplies 29183 United Way 372.50 Employee Contributions 29184 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 2,560.00 Consulting Service-Emissions Monitoring Project 29185 YCA 795.00 Meeting Registration 29186 Zymark Corporation 9,697.50 Lab Supplies 29107 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 140.D6 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimb. Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 7116100 to 7131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 29188 Patrick B.Carnahan 1,093.92 Meefing?reining Expense Reimb. 29169 County of Orange 100.00 Permit Fee 29190 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,340.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 29191 Robert P.Ghirelli 445.00 Meeting7raming Expense Reimb. 29192 Kurt B.Lind 938.24 MeetingRraming Expense Reimb. 29193 Peter M.Morrison 1,009.24 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimb. 29194 Orange County Sanitation District 321.97 Petty Cash Reimb. 29195 Blue Cross of California 187,550.23 Medical Insurance Premium 29198 FIaNET Corporation 96.681.87 Computer Sofware MainL Agreement 29197 Municipal Water Dist of Orange County 55,215.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 29198 Orange County Sanitation District 439,873.75 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 29199 Robert F.Driver Assoc. 955,000.00 Property Insurance MO 6-10-92 29200 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. - 77,227.70 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 29201 Southern California Edison 34,342.02 Power 29202 3 Com Corporation 26.936.42 Computer Hardware Maud. 29203 CASA 1,000.00 Conference Registration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,036,987.76 Payroll Otsbureements 19756-19938 Employee Paychecks 71.181.86 BOP 19939-20055 Employee Paychecks 159,154.80 Biweekly Payroll 7126/00 51429-51877 Direct Deposit Statements 681,309.82 Biweekly Payroll 7/26/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 911,646.48 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 3,709,674.51 August Principal Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series 8 Certificate of Participation State Street Bank&Treat Co.of CA. 8,053,566.68 August Principal Interest Payment on 1990-92 Advance Refund COP Total Wire Transfer Payments $11.763,241.19 Total Claims Paid 7/16100.7131100 $17,711,875.43 Page 9 of 9 .— �., ,1 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, July 19, 2000 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday,July 19, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Anna Piercy, Director Peter Green, Vice Chair Don Hughes Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: Jim Silva,County Supervisor Blake Anderson, General Manager Jan Debay, Past Chair of the Board Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Layne Baroldi, Environmental Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the June 28, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Eckenrode did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that SAWPA had taxed a letter to the District requesting Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 July 19, 2000 a 30-day delay before certifying the EIR/EIS on the Santa Ana River Interceptor improvements. This will be provided to the Directors at the regular Board meeting prior to considering the EIR/EIS agenda item. A. A Look Ahead: Our Collective Vision. Blake Anderson provided the members with the activities of the past six months and outlined those that are scheduled for the next six months. The members suggested revisions to the Vision and Mission Statements. The EMT will discuss them at its next meeting. An Operating Philosophy has been developed, which emphasizes accountability, balance and communication. Mr. Anderson announced that Lisa Lawson has accepted the position of Communications Manager. Her start date is July 31. The Guiding Principles were briefly discussed. These were developed by staff to form the framework of our organization and reinforce a professional code of ethics. Each department has developed its own vision statement. B. Update on the Five-year Staffing and Businss Plan. Greg Mathews reported that the Five-year Staffing and Business Plan will be presented to the Board in January. It will outline where we are headed and the resources necessary to reach those goals. A list of opportunities for improvement was compiled from comments received in surveys taken last December and January. Mr. Mathews described the activities of the Organizational Opportunities Committee that addressed the results of the surveys and it appears that the major issue is blurted lines of responsibilities. A responsibility conflict resolution model has been developed to help resolve some of the identified problem areas. Once issues are resolved,there could be an impact on staffing levels. Mr. Mathews presented a schedule that outlined the steps necessary for completing the five-year staffing plan by January 2000. Business units are being defined,which are the lowest foundational or core unit, in an attempt to identify commonality or areas of similar responsibility that could provide higher efficiencies. C. Update on Kem County and Kings County Biosolids Activities. Layne Baroldi reported that the CEOA hearing on the Kem County biosolids ordinance has been changed to August 30 in Visalia, California. A response brief is being prepared. At this time, about one-half of our biosolids are being applied in Kem County. Regulators are keeping a close watch on these activities. The Kings County biosolids ordinance is being drafted and staff has reviewed and commented. Most of the concerns expressed were addressed in the revision. Adoption is scheduled within 90 days, after the state-wide general order is adopted. The State Water Resources Control Board issued a programmatic EIR that allows for continuation of Class B land application. A workshop is scheduled for August 3 on the General Order EIR. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 July 19, 2000 Due diligence is underway on the McCarthy Farms property and facilities. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that there was no progress on the Crow Winthrop issue. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D) A. Increasing Awards within IDEA Program Greg Mathews provided the members with the results of the IDEA Committee's findings on other award programs and the recommendation. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duty carried to recommend to the Board that the award amount for approved IDEA submittals be increased from 10%of the cost savings with a cap at$3,000 to 10%of the first year's cost savings with a cap of$10,000. B. At-will Employment Contracts for Executive Management Team Blake Anderson reported that five of the nine Executive Management Team members currently have At-will Employment Contracts that were negotiated with the General Manager. The resolution granting the General Manager authority to negotiate these contracts provides the flexibility to form a cohesive team but does not address several important issues, including severance and work benefits. It is recommended that the General Manager be allowed to offer severance packages to EMT members for up to six months and to offer flexible benefits up to 30%, the current amount for regular employees. All benefits and salary will be within the existing ranges and the contracts are to be voluntary. A report will be made to the FAHR Committee when these contracts are finalized. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board that the General Manager be authorized to include severance packages and benefits flexibility within existing guidelines. C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the PDC Committee at its August meeting were reviewed. The OMTS and FAHR Committees do not meet in August. D. FY 2000-01 Management Salary Increases Blake Anderson and Use Tomko reported on the results of the most recent salary survey and presented the proposed increases for the management team. Several positions will receive base-building increases to bring them to mid-range. Because no range changes are anticipated, the increases are not subject to Board approval. Mr. Anderson also reported that Michelle Tuchman, who left at the end of May, would be getting a pro-rated (11/12) adjustment as a result of her efforts over the past eleven months, as these increases are for the past year. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 July 19, 2000 Mrs. Tomko reported on ongoing negotiations with the 501 and SPMT units. (9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 23,2000 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 23, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m. Submitted by: gen Tappan!/// 1 ring Committee Secretary MNry.W I¢pm W ISiEEgIM1V3 PJMMI iTEEV WUNOb]19]0 SC MNWu.Uou STEERING COMMITTEE nxuRg oau Ta BE.W qr. onsz000 s- -moo AGENDA REPORT reM RIM MWMMW Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Originator: Yvonne Schwab, Environmental Specialist SUBJECT: INCREASING AWARD MAXIMUM OF THE I.D.E.A. PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase from the current$3,000 maximum award amount to $10,000 maximum award for approved IDEA's that offer significant cost savings. SUMMARY The District's suggestion award program, entitled Incentive for District Employee Achievements (IDEA), was adopted in June 1997 as a replacement for the PRIDE Program, initiated by Board Resolution on May 13, 1981. Under this program monetary awards are given to employees for IDEAS that are deemed to enhance employee safety or could provide a cost savings for the District. Currently, the safety IDEA awards range from $50-$200. The cost savings IDEAs are awarded as 10% of the first year's net annual savings and are capped at$3,000. All District employees up through the Supervisor level are qualified to participate in this program. However, the IDEA must be beyond the scope of the suggester's normal duties and responsibilities to qualify for the award. Making the IDEA Program more lucrative to its contributors should offer more of an incentive for employees to think out of the box and contribute significant cost-savings ideas. According to the Fairfax, VA-based Employee Involvement Assn., suggestion programs are paying off. An association survey of 6,000 companies that use suggestion programs concluded that the businesses save an average of$6,224 for each idea implemented. The Steering Committee during the March 22, 2000 meeting supported staffs proposal to further research the maximum IDEA award amounts and directed staff to develop a recommendation for the same. Two options were provided: 1. A Flat 10% award 2. A sliding scale with the total award capped at$20,000 10% up to $30,000 • 7% of the difference up to$100,000 5% of the difference up to$250,000 3% of the difference up to$450,000 Staff recommends the IDEA award be a flat 10% based upon the net annual savings with a $10,000 cap. Additionally, 10% of the total award over$500 would go to the Employee Activities Committee. Many employees are involved in implementing an idea and by contributing to the EAC all employees would benefit through the EAC picnic, Christmas party etc. 1VWmtlrblY.'P EmYpeW1BUNIyRM�Rrpwh\'IDRt&e Aq E R.�11(c). % Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Since inception of the IDEA Program, $7,835 has been awarded to employees and estimated tangible savings to date is $30,000 as shown in attachment 1. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Currently this item is not directly budgeted. Costs are captured under Personnel costs for each Department or under General Manager's contingency fund. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attachment 2 includes results of a survey done of suggestion programs at other organizations: ALTERNATIVES 1. Develop other suitable modifications of sliding scale proposal. 2. Keep IDEA Program as it exists. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. 3-year recap of I.D.E.A. Program 2. Survey results: Other organization's suggestion programs 3. L.A. Times article 2/13/97 rv.mnwnt�.paa\ wb•\mua Ne^e flmdwm sore eYeAl flw�bemAsn ltlq.au fl^aie ^ Page 2 May 9, 2000 ATTACHMENTI To: EMT From: I.D.E.A. Program Screening Committee Orange County Sanitation District I.D.E.A. Program FY 97.98 FY 98-99 FY 99.00 44 total ideas 28 total ideas 43 total ideas Dollar RecJd Dollar. RmVd Dollar R.Vd Anwunt Paynrent Amaad Payment MaunG Payment Approved (AccL) Approved (y1C1 L) Approves (Acc1.) 1 E 100 97-12-03 E 200 98-07-14 E 100 99-07-14 2 E 50 97-12-03 E 200 98-07-14 E 100 99-07-28 3 E 50 97-12-16 E 200 98-07-27 E 100 99-07-28 4 E 200 98-01-14 r$ 2W 98-09-M E 100 99-07-28 5 E 355 98-01-14 98-09-23 E 100 99-07-28 5 E 200 98-02-10 98-10-07 E 100 99-07-26 7 E 200 98.02-10 W12-16 E 200 99-07-28 6 E 100 98-02-10 99-0505 E 200 99-08-17 9 E 200 9602-10 9&0616 E 100 99-08-11 10 E 200 9so3-10 E 1,800 E 50 99-11-02 11 § 1,655 E 480 99-11.02 12 E 1.300 99-12-15 13 E 100 99-12-29 14 E 200 00-02-23 15 E 200 00m-23 16 E 550 01 -0 17 Total amount paid as of 4-18-00 § 7,635 E 100 00-0306 18 E too 60-0405 19 Estimated tangible savings to date E 30,000 E 200 00-04-18 E 4,380 C:WEMPY3year update.de]pald by F'9 ATTACHMENT 2 "IDEA"Incentives—Other Organizations 1. City of Los Angeles— 10%of first year savings if NOT part of your job duties/responsibilities. 2. Hyperion—No program. 3. Sacramento—No program. 4. EBMUD—Employee Excellence Program— internal competition with recipient receiving a plaque. 5. Central Costa County—Gainsharing Program of 50/50 with employees earning up to $400 annually. 6. King County(Seattle)—Gainsharing Program (complicated formula for pay-out). 7. I.R.W.D. Suggestion Program— Suggestions that provides one-time savings to District will not exceed 10%of the net or$500, whichever is less. Suggestions that provide continuous saving is 15% of net award savings or$750, whichever is less. Safety or intangible=$100. Attachment 3 Souped-Up Air Force Suggestion Box Pays Off a they would onl ■ IODOY8U011: Many yget one legitimate recommendation. � man suggestion, spoke coming iou a month. The systems Over the last three years,the of man Thad p poi n said.Employe f PBRIOs el'C:IIti(: rasping teal now arc compuLcmad. Form has dolts out an average of can build up points and turn the rCOiscoverinb the Value Of professionally managed and have 0 million a year for suggestions- in for a variety of gifts. include. real incentives,"he said. that have saved the service an calculators or sports hags. Gee. Workers ideas. According to the Fairfax. Va.. average of about $221 million a sionally. the division aim pays o _ based Employee Involvement year. Mealy mid. She cited one cash awards ranging from $50 By SfEVEN GINSBERG Assn. they're aim paying off. An example in which an employee $160.Madden said. wMalacron Post association survey of 6,000 comma- saved the Air Force $60 million in nies that use suggestion programs unneeded aircraft repairs. "We encourage employees WASHINCTON—The Air Force concluded that the businesses mve Lockheed Martin Corp.'s Fed. suggest improvements:' Mado, discarded its employee suggestion an average of$6,224 for each idea oral Systems Division in Gaithers. mid "It can be about how to n program last October.The program implemented. burg.Md.,has whit it calls the Cast the company. a suggestion also wasn't a failure—in fact, it was so Manufacturers make up the ma- Effectiveness Plus Program to an. decision malting or an improve useful that the service wanted as jority of suggestion-system advo- licit employee recommendations. menl in software development V figure out how to make it bigger. cates, though many service The program encourages work. know that the person making ti simpler and even more lucrative to businesses are starting to jump on on to submit ideas, online or on suggestion has a certain level its contributors. board.Marlin said Paper.by awarding points for each expertise." Air Force officials put their Suggestion programs are simple: heads together and came up with a They offer employees mine way to program they dubbed Innovative submit whatever ideas they dream Development through Emglovee up. The rationale is that workers ,Awareness(IDEA). are in the best position to sec "r eerre was some discontent in where something could be im. the field about the old system," proved. in every area from health mid Cathy Mealy, IDEA program and safety standards to what kind manager. "It was paper-driven; of vending machines might work there were so many process steps, best so many delays." Martin mid the suggestion box So the Air Force automated it. might work even better in the'90s, revised the suggestion-process and when workers are often better revamped the reward system at a trained than their predecessors and coal of$3.4 critics, which will be consider themselves empowered to Ad over the next few years. makedecisions . might sound like a lot of "Typically, today's workers are money,but the Air Force says it's mare educated than in the past"he tiny compared with the $213 mil- said, and "companies realize that lion in money-saving suggestions people on the front lines often the program generated last year. know more about what's going on." The Air Fares Isn't alone in "A side benefit is you get em- rediscavering this low-cost, low- ployees to think like managers." tech approach to improving the Martin said. "It's a grooming way an organization is run. After mechanism for future supervisors two decades of such trends w and managers." quality circles and "tots) quality There's another benefit for management" programs, many workers too: money. The standard companies are looking for a little reward is 10%of the money that a thinking out of the box—Ne mg- suggestion saves in its Brat year of gestion bom implementation, a- a maxim- ucc of Suggestion boxes,quality circles $10.000,and a flat fee for sessful and wtal quality management pro- ideas with unquantifiable benefits, grams run on the same currency— Martin mid. employee feedback—but the usual Instead of cash,mine companies approaches can be costly and of give employees points for each mixed value, workplace experts useful idea, with the goal of en- my. So companies are going di- couraging workers to keep coming rectly w the source and asking up with ideas.Generally,the points workers what they think. can be exchanged for gifts,such as 'Suggestion systems are making luggage or office equipment. with a comeback:'said Charles Martin, more-expensive gifts casting more an associate professor of marketing points. at Wichita State University and Managers normally are ex- co-author of "Empieyce Sugges- empLed from them programs be- lion Sysieina Boosting Productiv- cause it is theirjob to make sugges- I -ind Profits." Lions, Martin mid, but sometimes 'hirty years ago most camps- they receive rewards if one of their a,a had same earl of program,but subordinates turns in a winning l I_��tM�S '�St+JF-SS Flit �-�13�`l7 t DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, August 2, 2000 at 4 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, August 2,2000 at 4 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas Nixon, Office of General Counsel Jan Debay, Committee Chair Don Hughes, Supervisor Silva's Office Don Bankhead Vicki Wilson, OCPFRD Director Guy Carrot o Larry Paul, OCPFRD Manager Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Board Peter Green, Vice Chair of the Board STAFF PRESENT: Shawn Boyd Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Donahue Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Directors Absent: Gary Streed, Director of Finance None Kevin Hadden, Acting ECM Manager Lisa Lawson, Communications Manager Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) AGENDA The agenda was posted in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (5) APPROVE MINTUES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS The minutes of the June 14 and July 12, 2000 meetings were approved as drafted. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Debay did not make a report. OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 August2, 2000 (7) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Staff Report Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, provided an update on diverted flows being accepted into the District's treatment process. At this time there are a total of 12 diversions in place and flows diverted to the district's system are averaging approximately 2 mgd. At this time there are no problems with quality of the diverted flow or capacity. B. Vicky Wilson and Larry Paul, of the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department, explained their responsibilities regarding this issue. The County is the lead agency as it holds the NPDES permit,which applies to both stormwater and urban runoff water. Each city within the county pays a portion of the NPDES permit fee based on a pre-agreed fair share formula. If the county was to pay for the diversions, this same formula could be applied. It appears that the only available option at this time Is diverting urban runoff to the Sanitation District for treatment. During the next 2-3 years, additional studies and discussions with regulators will be undertaken in an attempt to develop a final long- term solution. At this time the Clean Water Act is the driver and the County is required to respond and implement best management practices. EPA is looking at setting stormwater standards at both the national and state levels. Meeting those standards will require a cooperative effort by many agencies. C. Committee-led Discussion Tom Nixon, representing General Counsel, indicated that any fix that the Sanitation District decides to participate in is discretionary, as it is not in the purview of the agency. The policy adopted by the Board in April requires that only those areas where there could be environmental impacts from runoff and there are no other alternatives available could divert water to the sewer system. D. Committee Recommendation Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Board adopt the De minimus Option proposed by staff to set an aggregate flow cap at 10 mgd;waive fees as long as flows stay below 4 mgd (OCSD will absorb the first -$450,000 in operations and maintenance costs); charge fees when flows exceed 4 mgd at the Class 1 industry rate for O&M only($321 per million gallons); accommodate modest increases in dry season flows; and create incentives to limit diversions. Staff was directed to prepare a recommendation for consideration by the full board at the August or September meeting. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 3 August 2, 2000 (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications or supplemental agenda items. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION and STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS It was determined that there is no need for another meeting and the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Diversion Policy and Financing will be sunset. Chair Debay expressed her appreciation to the members of the Committee and thanked them for their contributions and attendance. (13) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. S bmitted by:}//7 eriTappan Acl/Hoc Committee Secretary H lup NdU6m IGAMGccPTLrlm Rv,aH PoKYS BM fvunoglp9p$M MnufeiM[ DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, August 3, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, August 3, 2000, at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Guy Carrozzo Maintenance Brian Donahue Gary Streed, Director of Finance Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Gerald Sigler Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Jan Debay, Past Board Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Directors Absent: Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Lynn Daucher Jon Thomsic, Project Manager Christina Shea Andrei loan, Project Manager Peter Green, Board Vice Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the July 6, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Director Patterson abstained. e PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 August 3, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS The Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%were reviewed. (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT The Director of Engineering reported that there was one PSA and no addenda approved by the General Manager between June 29 and July 26, 2000. (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT The Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report was reviewed. July 1 is the beginning of a new cycle. Existing contracts were extended for one additional year. (12) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM(GWRS) STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg provided an update on the activities related to the project over the past month. The project is on schedule. More than one-half of the design memoranda are complete. The Joint Coordinating Committee will review these. Several studies are underway, including a health risk study. Expert panels will review these. A right-of-way is being negotiated with the County of Orange. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 August 3, 2000 Permit conditions are expected within a month. A NDMA study is underway and the lab will be sampling all influent tmnklines and process streams within the plants in an attempt to locate this compound. Pilot testing with UV lights will be done in an attempt to break the compound down and determine the dose of UV necessary to accomplish it. Staff is also looking at power requirements. A contract was awarded at the last Joint Coordinating Committee meeting for a study on ways to fund the project. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e) a. PDC00-57 Ratify Change Order No.2 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No.J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition to the contract of$84,166, increasing the total contract amount to $2,403,159. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the action. b. PDC00-58 (1) Approve a budget amendment of$15,682,000 for Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Ouffall, Job No. J-39, for a total project budget not to exceed$16,907,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for an amount not to exceed$300,000 Doug Stewart made a presentation and explained the necessity to move this project up. It was originally scheduled to begin 8-10 years from now. However, based on the findings of the modeling, staff now considers this to be a high priority item. The work will include increasing the size of the ballast rock on about one-mile of the inshore section of the 120-inch outfall. The Committee members directed staff to address the permit issues before proceeding. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. PDC00-59 Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$511,045 for a total amount not to exceed $3,578,324. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 August 3, 2000 d. PDC00-60 Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Plant Reinvention/ Automation Project, Job No.J-42, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$1,896,186, for a total amount not to exceed$7,495,779. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. e. PDC00-61 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41,for an amount not to exceed$3,332,829. Doug Stewart reported that he and Andrei loan met with Yorba Linda city staff and discussed the project. It appears that the Yorba Linda staff members no longer have any issues with the project. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (14) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (18) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The date for the next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting was changed to Thursday, September 14, 2000 at p.m.to avoid a conflict with a League of Cities meeting. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 August 3, 2000 (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. Submitted by: I ,^ Je Tappan P Committee Secretary H:lwp.cM%agandaY2DC=O\MinNss\080300 PDC MinNs i , PDC COMMITTEE r�eeang Orte To ad.Or qr . erDsraD e23110 AGENDA REPORT "� � 1/le " Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS, JOB NO. J-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$15,682,000 for Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for a total project budget not to exceed $16,907,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for an amount not to exceed $300,000. SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District's (District's) Strategic Plan places special emphasis on use of the existing 120-inch ocean outfall. All disposal alternatives developed in the Strategic Plan, rely on the 120-inch ocean ouffall as the primary means to discharge treated wastewater flows through 2020. The District is also planning to build upstream storage and diversion facilities and delay construction of a new outfall. Consequently, the existing 120-inch ocean outfall must provide the highest degree of reliability possible. Where the outfall lies on the ocean floor, it is held in place and protected by a rock ballast protective cap. The probability that the existing protective cap would lose a significant amount of rock during a storm event increases each year. Over the next five years, there is a one in four chance that the existing ouffall ballast will be significantly affected. Rock ballast is the only thing preventing movement, undermining, and the potential failure of the ouffall. Placement of additional larger rock on the 120-inch ocean outfall is needed in order to bring the existing structure up to current engineering standards. Completion of the installation of the additional ballast rock will reduce the District's risk of potential failure of the District's 1204nch ocean oulfall. The ocean outfall re-ballasting project is analogous to a seismic retrofit project. Carollo Engineers' project report dated February 13, 1998, on the structural condition of the 120-inch outfall, Job No. J-39, recommended placement of additional ballast rock. The recommendation was based on additional wave data not available during the original design, current analytical methods, and the results of extensive research conducted over the past thirty years. It was also recommended that the theoretical results be verified and refined by conducting physical wave tank testing. Page 1 Physical wave tank testing was conducted at Oregon State University(OSU), in July 1999 and January 2000. The model tests were conducted in a large wave tank located at the OSU Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory. Wave tank testing conducted in July 1999 (Model 1), modeled the off shore zone. Wave tank testing conducted in January 2000 (Model 2), modeled the near shore zone. The testing program analyzed, under simulated conditions, potential failure of proposed ballast protection by means of exposure to generated wave forces. The prototype ouffall pipe was placed such that the azimuth (angle of the approaching waves) in the model was the same as the azimuth experienced by the 120-inch ouffall. The testing protocol began with a slightly smaller wave series, subsequently building up to the most significant wave series for a particular wave period and height. The model runs exposed the prototype outfall to similar wave forces that would be expected during various storm events (ie., 10-year, 20-year, 50-year). The model runs confirmed the recommendation to re-ballast the outall with larger rock. District's staff proposes to negotiate cost for services under a design contract with Carollo Engineers, in order to commence the design of the re-ballasting effort. This will be presented to the Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee at a future date. Preliminary cost estimates for the design services, excluding subcontractors, construction services, and contingencies range from $200,000- $300,000. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the original PSA and subsequent addenda. This project has been budgeted as a future project in the current Capital Improvement Program. At the time of budget approval, it did not appear that there was an immediate need to re-rock the ocean outall. Subsequently and upon further clarification of the results of the wave tank modeling effort, it became apparent that the District should commence the design and construction efforts associated with re- ballasting the 120-inch ocean oulall. The current total project budget for this project is $1,225,000. This budget includes funds for engineering services needed for the investigation and repair work required for continued use and reliable performance of the District's 78-inch and 120-inch ocean outfalls. The funding included all work, up to and including, physical wave tank modeling. To date, these funds have been nearly exhausted. The current budget does not include monies necessary for design, construction, and Staff services needed to re-ballast the 120-inch ocean ouffall. The revised total budget for this project is $16,907,000. This authorization requests an allocation of$140,000 for Staff time necessary to commence negotiations with Carollo Engineers, finalize a design contract, and oversee the design and construction efforts. ate: 1+ Page 2 BUDGET IMPACT Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ® This item has been budgeted as a future project. (Line item: Page 182) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted for FY00-01. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The 120-inch ocean outfall was designed in the late 1960s and constructed in 1970-71. Design of the ou(fall stability was based on design criteria and provisions of protection from the following: • Erosion and wave-induced water forces • Earthquake forces • Internal thrust forces acting on the pipe sections and structures • Soil foundation failure The"design wave" used in the original design was developed by Dr. Fred Raichlen, from data recorded during the 1939 hurricane, which was considered the 30 to 50 year storm event. Preliminary results from the analysis conducted in the February 1998 engineering report indicated that almost one mile of the 120-inch outfall would benefit from additional reinforcing ballast. The original rock size design (currently being used) to protect the 120-inch ocean outfall along the one-mile section ranges from 20-150 pounds. Results from the analysis conducted in the report indicated that much larger rock (median size of 700-1000 pounds)would be needed to adequately protect the structural integrity of the 120-inch ocean outfall. The recommendations were based on additional wave data not available during the original design, current analytical methods, and the results of extensive research conducted over the past thirty years. In January 2000, Dr. Fred Raichlen and Dr. Charles Sollitt completed physical wave tank modeling of the 1204nch ocean outfall. The testing program analyzed under simulated conditions, potential failure of proposed ballast protection by means of exposure to simulated wave forces of various magnitudes. In March 2000, Carollo Engineers submitted the Final Report for the Reballast Design and Cost Estimate. The report summarizes the results of the physical modeling conducted and provides a cost estimate for re-rocking approximately one mile of the outfall at a total cost of approximately $11,000,000. R. rose Page 3 The results of the testing conducted on the shallow section of the outfall prototype, ' indicated that the near shore zone protective rock cap could be reduced from the initially planned modeling rock size of 1000 pounds to a median rock size of 750 pounds. The results of the testing conducted on the deeper section of the outfall prototype indicated that the offshore zone protective rock could be reduced from the initially planned modeling rock size of 700 pounds to a median rock size of 300 pounds. In April 2000, Staff requested Carollo Engineers to provide more detail with regards to the level of risk the Orange County Sanitation District(District) faces should the District delay the design and installation of the additional rock ballast. In June 2000, additional information provided by Dr. Raichlen (Attachment 3) indicated that there could be a 24% chance within the next five years of significant rock movement, should the District delay the design and installation of the additional rock ballast. If the oulfall and ballast then experienced additional significant forces due to further wave action, the ouffall could be subject to damage. Of major concern, is significant differential movement between two pipe sections causing leakage or physical separation. Recommendation Based on the results of the wave tank modeling conducted and the risk of failure analysis associated with our current structural conditions, the District's staff recommends commencement of the design and construction of this project during FY00-01. District's staff propose to commence negotiations with Carollo Engineers for engineering services needed to prepare plans and specifications necessary to re-rock the 120-inch ocean ouffall from Station 27+00 to Station 70+00. Staff recommends Carollo Engineers for the following reasons: • Carollo Engineers conducted the original design • Carollo Engineers has been extensively involved in past surveying efforts • Carollo Engineers has been extensively involved in the physical testing • Carollo Engineers has been involved in recent outfall inspection and repair • Carolllo Engineers completed the pre-design work • Districts staff have been very satisfied with Carollo's previous work Following completion of satisfactory negotiations, Staff proposes to bring Addendum No. 7 to the November Planning Design and Construction Committee (PDC) Committee and Board meetings for further discussion. Staff will request approval of Addendum No. 7 in order to proceed with the design and construction in accordance with the following schedule: "^"^^ Page 4 120-Inch Ocean Outfall Re-Rocking Schedule �� 0.w ��Al es or12 ; � � � 'Corn letlon Da Approve Addendum No. 7 11/15/00 Prepare Plans and Specifications 06/30/01 Award Construction Contract 09/30/01 Manufacture and Test Rock 12/31/01 Barge/Haul and Placement of Rode 03/31/02 ALTERNATIVES Option 1 — No further action This alternative involves relying on the original design and current condition of the 120-inch outfall to continue to protect the outfall from wave forces well into the future. Although this option is the least expensive, it is also involves the most risk. • Option 2— Immediately commence design and construction efforts to re-rock the 120-inch outfall (recommended) This alternative uses the information obtained from the wave tank modeling as a basis to decide to re-rock the 120-inch ocean outfall at an estimated cost of $11,000.000. It would provide additional protection to the 120-inch ocean outfall as soon as possible. This option reduces the risk of failure and promotes increased reliability at the earliest possible date. CEQA FINDINGS In accordance with Section 15302 of Article 19, of the California Environmental Quality Act, this project is categorically exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Letter from Dr. Fredric Raichlen, dated June 20, 2000 CJH:jak.jo:jak Kxwp.dl geMa�PDCW00wgende Repo VO-59-J3 -0a0=.dm •,,,,,. '� Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Investigation and Repair-Ocean Outfalls JOB NO.J49 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED -PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION PROPOSEDTOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE TO DATE(%) Prow Development $ 108000 $ 108000 S - $ 108.000 $ 108000 $ - $ 10a.000 $ 108,000 100% Desl nStaf $ 253000 $ 253.000 $ 41,000 S 294.000 S 154,000 S 140,000 $ 294000 $ 154,000 52% Comullent PSA $ 414,000 $ 414DDD $ 1.638.000 $ 2052000 $ 684054 $ - $ 684054 $ 640.000 94% COnsWc6on Canlract' $ 450.DD0 $ 4500D0 $ 12699000 $ 13,149.000 $ 88./07 5 - E 88,407 $ 88A07 100% DOnsW cllon Stag' $ - $ - $ 1,064.000 $ 1,064,000 $ 24,000 $ $ 24,000 $ 24,000 100% COnBn $ - $ - $ 240.000 $ 240.000 $ - $ - $ - 8 TOTAL $ 1,225,000 $ 1,225.000 $ 15.682.000 $ 16,907,000 $ 1.056.461 $ 140.000 $ 1,198,461 S 1.014,407 85% Pdoreullro tlon for conslrwion d Nr sms aUlro to oversee pdmdMr,,mneaule. H.Wq.db4WM4CONTRPCTSLLee1IJ4eINo mBudeN-U,xi.pISNNe Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-39 Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls Total Project Budget: $1,274,600 Consultant:: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Start Dale of Project: March 1996 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/27196 Original Investigation and mirror repair to ocean ouffalis $433,260 $433,260 PSA 10122/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-inch outfall $38.310 $471.570 4106198 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgate repair $23,090 $494,660 8/01/98 3 Provide assistance during bid &construction of endgate repair $21,770 $516,430 3115/99 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling)needed to refine $109,860 $626,290 recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-Inch ocean outfall 1011199 5 Revise the cost allocation by line Rem to cover additional costs Incurred by $0 $626.290 Carollo Engineers. 11/17/99 6 Provide engineering services to conduct additional wave tank modeling $57,764 $684,054 needed to refine recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-inch ocean ouffall H1wp,dWe ngUOBS&CONTRACTSV-39U-39 PSA status mWd.doc ATTACHMENT 3 FREDRIC RAICHLEN, Sc.D., P.E. Civil Engineer 1200 East California Boulevard 138-78 Pasadena,California 91125 Telephone: (626) 39&4403 Fax:(626)395�2940 June20,2000 Mr.David ludwin Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O.Box 8127 - FOnntain Valley,CA 927284127 --- I In his letter 1 will address several questions which were raised at our meeting on June 1,2000 in your offices. Some of these were addressed in my iepdtt entitled"The - Re-Rocking of the Orange County Oudfall"submitted to Carrillo Engineers on May 2, 1997 and included as Appendix C of the report"The Structural Condition of the 120 inch Cutfall and General Repair of the 78 inch Outfall"by Carrillo Engineers dated February 13, 1998. For convenience I have included herein copies of selected figures from that repom and I will refer to them by the numbers shown in the figures. I Figure 11 shows the recurrence interval of the probable maximum wave height of storm events which impact the outfall site at Position 1. To obtain these data, 121 storm events(hindeast or measured) for the period from 1905 through 1995 were analyzed to define the significant wave heights,wave periods(obtained from the peak of the wave energy spectrum),and direction along with the local bathymetry. Assuming a Rayleigh distribution of wave heights in any giver storm event.the probable maximum wave in that event at the indicated position(a depth of 32.65 ft or 40.65 fr depending on tide)was determined from wave refraction considerations. The recurrence intervals of these storm events were evaluated and the data ate presented in Figure 11. This figure can be j combined with Figure l (of this letter)to evaluate the risk associated with these events. Figure 1 shows the probability of encountering a storm event with the indicated recurrence interval in a shill mre lifetime of 50 years and of 75 years. For example this figure shows that for a wave with a 50 year recurrence interval there is a better than even chance(63%)that the oudall would be exposed to this wave in a 50 year period of time. These storm eveats(Figure t 1)were used to define the corresponding expected bottom velocities,and from these velocities the median weights of rock which would resist the wave induced forces were determined. These rock weights are presented in i Figures 18 through 22 for various locations along the outfall at the weight of rock which would be moved with the iadicard recurrence interval. (For example.Figure 18 shows that:a 10 It,weight rock would be caused to move with a recurrence interval of 10 yyears at Position 1.) Shown to the right in Figure 18(and as boxes in each of the other figures) is the median(50%)rock weight and the upper and lower limits of the distribution of the existing A ruck which was specified. This shows thin would be rock motion for the medico weight of the existing Class A rock gradation with a recurrence interval of about l9 years for the depth of 32.95 ft(extreme low tide). The encounter probability for these events for periods of one, two,and five years is shown in Figure 2. Using the example for the existing rock described above,it is seen that for a recurrence interval of 19 years,there would be a probability of about 5% that I'this rock would be in movement in any one year. This information is summari2ed in the attached table which should be read in 'combination with the above cited report. This shows, for example, that at Position 1 with s depth of 32.63 ft,Class A Rock would have a probability of encountering the 19 year 'recurrence event in one year of about 5%,in two years of about 10%and in five years of nearly 24%. I uust this information is sufficient to assist the District in mating their decisions with regard to re-rocking the more vulnerable sections of the ourfall. Siacuely,G� Fredric Raichlen . Civil Engineer (C 17505 CA, GE 19727 NJ) cc: Carollo Engineers,atm Duane R.Jensen 30.0 Position I 25.0 Latilude= 33"37'28" Longitude= 117°57'47" I I 20.0 Lq • x A ' 15.0 ' Al is c 61 o It = 32.65 ft x A h=40.65 ft 10.0 i 5.0 0.0 1.0 10.0 1 oo.Q Recurrence (yrs) Graph.7 Figure I I Variation of probable maximum wave height with tecurrence interval at Position Ifon high and low rides Data.3 lh= 33.37 A Data.3 It=40.65 h I . . — Figure I 'I'huprohubilily of in counter in 50 or 75 yeanof indicitiml recurrence inlcmd events. 120.(1 100.0 0 a 6 G0.0 C 0 Encounered in 50 ps ZZ F W O Encountered in 75 yts 40.0 20.0 0 25 50 75 100 Tr Recurrence interval Event (yrs) Data Encounter Probabitity Graph Encounter Probabilily.I l !;, :�r.•iu any���..��������.. rol OM mmm 1 1 04 111 MEMOS �Mmmm momm MMJW!;JMMM��mm M No mom - ------- ------- BMW _mom = ==__==___ 1 11 111 1 =___=_= =-=____ ,, ��. rl ��iiiG�®�CiiiG ����� ��■■�ez����=mono �■m mmmwg�mm moll Fi6un:2 The probnhility of cucouoter it] kill, two,or I'ivc yours of iudicntcd ICCnrTO)Ce iIIIcrvol cvcnls. 1M.0 s T 10.0 m p E a 1.0- q LO Encountered in one year W Encountered in two years Encountered in five years 0.1 1 10 100 Tr Recurrence Interval Event (yrs) Data Encounter Probability Graph Encounter Probability Mcdum Ituuur- 11usilinn Lulitude Lnnsilude Deptb It�u:k Ruck rcncc 1lnconmerpmbahilily (°/a) (Iq Cluss \Vuighl hderyul (Ihs) (yr.') yrs 2 ytr 5 yrs 1 33037'28" 117057'47" 32.65 A 150 19. 5.23 10.19 23.56 40.65 A 150 23 4.33 8.46 19.84 1 to 2 40.65 B 35 17 5.84 11.34 25.99 47.75 B 35 40: 1 2.49 4.92 11.86 I 2 33037'01" 117058'04" 47.75 C 20 40 2.49 4.92 11.86 55.75 C 20 >100 I 1.0 1.99 4.90 3 37036'41" 117°58'16" 56.46 D 14 52 11.92 3.8 9.23 64.48 D 14 60, i 1.66 3.3 9.04 4 33036*07" 117058'39" 91.22 E 1 80' 1.25 2.48 6.09 99.22 E I >100 1.0 1.99 4.90 Table shoeing the encounter probability for periods of one.Lvo,and five years for the indicated recurrence interval of rock movement. i I PDC COMMITTEE MeebrgDae TOBd.oron. e/03/00 a/23/00 AGENDA REPORT Rem Numh RemN D 9B- Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Ludwi ector of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: DESIGN OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. 131-37, ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$511,045 for a total amount not to exceed $3,578,324. SUMMARY The District's Strategic Plan requires additional primary treatment capacity to be in place at Plant No. 1 by 2003. In September 1998, the District issued a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to hire Brown and Caldwell for preliminary design studies, final design, and services during construction for primary clarifiers 16-31. This project includes design of an additional 96-mgd of primary treatment facilities and improvements to existing primary clarifiers nos. 6-15. Recently, the District's staff has approved new design standards, process control standards, electrical standards, and new master specifications. Proposed Addendum No. 4 provides additional funding necessary to bring the plans and specifications up to the District's new standards. Proposed Addendum No. 4 also provides additional funding for miscellaneous improvements requested by Staff to improve operational flexibility and reduce maintenance needs. Proposed Addendum No. 4 adds the following major project elements requested by Staff: • An additional local process control building will be designed and constructed in order to improve construction sequencing, reduce impacts to operations during construction, and enhance reliability of operations. • The existing controls for primary clarifiers 1-5 will be retrofitted from the existing split control between two programmable logic controllers (PLC's)to one PLC. The modification will allow better integration among the basins during operations. • Additional monitoring equipment will be installed in the primary effluent channels, which will allow for early detection of problems and improve process control. • The District's will procure variable frequency drives towards the end of construction in an effort to obtain the latest, most advanced devices. Page 1 • A new chemical feed facility will be design and constructed in order to optimize the treatment process at a reduced chemical feed rate. • The existing polymer PLC needs to be replaced in order to accommodate the additional chemical facilities needed in accordance with the new design. The Consultant will need to modify the plans and specifications in order for the Contractor to conduct the programming and testing required for this project element. • The Consultant will develop and maintain an equipment and materials database that is needed to support operations and maintenance needs as we move towards unattended operations and fewer Staff. Proposed Addendum No. 4 eliminates all of the PLC Programming and Testing elements associated with this contract. This work will be performed by the successful Contractor. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 4 for$511,045, for a total Professional Services Agreement(PSA) amount of$3,578,324. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested for Addendum No. 4 and supporting Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) design staff costs. Refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the PSA, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, and this pending Addendum No.4. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section a-Page 68) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The original budget for this project was$38,450,000, based on preliminary estimates developed in the 1989 Master Plan. In the 1999-00 budget, the total budget for this project was revised to $75,410,000. This total budget amount includes design and construction costs necessary to build primary clarifiers 16-31 and related facilities. It also includes design and construction costs associated with the recommended improvements which were approved by the Board via Addendum No. 1. The original project concept did not include costs associated with the additional work required in subsequent Addenda Nos. 2, 3, and 4: • Evaluation of high rate clarifiers • Automation of existing primary clarifiers and improved foul air odor control • Modifications needed to existing facilities • Re-design efforts needed to satisfy new standards A�W WM Page 2 The cost for Addendum No. 4 is $511,045, for a total Professional Services Agreement (PSA) amount of$3,578,324. The proposed PSA fee of$3,578,324 was included in the y 2000-01 CORF Budget. As a result, a budget increase is not necessary. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with Addendum No. 4, Job No. P1-37 (NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE). The no action alternative could eliminate the implementation of process improvements and design enhancements needed to comply with the District's new standards, optimize the treatment process, reduce the construction period, and minimize future construction change orders. This may result in higher operation and maintenance costs and higher future capital costs. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal Letter from Brown and Caldwell dated June 27, 2000 CJH.,jak \W0baltWaW1%ntg1obaMgenda OW RepoMSW DC1%-37 Add.#4 AR.070600Aoo Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 I r Of�IQINALI' 1 113 IC,� Par 4�8E` I �L.Nt $Jy�l y till it '� 1 r 090jiO8ED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTNOfIIZD P{( UE 1 $� al �o�I ) 'N�I�� OtJ ' `TO�F%}L EXPENOIfUaE EkPENbED- BIIOQET $l(, T.6 Y E r� rti4y71 °II I� r ln,v r ill AUTHoaIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%): Pro ecl Development $ 66,000 $ 66,000 $ 66,000 $ 66,000 $ 66,000 100% Desl n Stall $ 402.000 $ 402,000 i,: $ 402.000 S 402,000 $ 402.000 100% Consultant PSA $ 3,826 000 $ 3.826.000 i. $ 3,087 279 $ 511,045 $ 3 578,324 $ 2,610,000 70% Consiractlon Contract $ 60 400,000 $ 60 400.000 Construction Other $ 508,000 $ 508,000 p'c $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 100% Construction Stall $ 1948000 $ 1948000SI $ 24000 $ 24000 $ 24000 100% Continaency $ 8300000 $ 8300000 ;•. (L i TOTAL $ 38,450,000 $ 75.450,000 $ 75,450,00D i5 $ 3,574.278 1$ 511,045 $ 4,085,324 1 $ 3,017.000 74% H WP.dlaranWOBS s CONTAACTS1 l-3A1P1-37 OUdget T9bb.B&C.ADD 44.0510141609 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. P1-37 Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Total Project Budget: $75,450,100 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: September 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 9/23/98 Original PSA Provide engineering services for 96-MGD Primary Clarifiers $1.993,000 $1,993,000 and Related Facilities 428/99 1 Provide engineering services for: (1)rehabilitation of existing $863.186 $2,856,185 primary clarifiers; (2)centralized sludge collection and transfer facilities(3)modification to influent distribution structure; and 4 installation of trickling filter feed line 11/15/99 2 Provide engineering services needed to conduct an $21,557 $2,877,742 evaluation of high rate clarifiers as recommended by the Value En ineer 12/15/99 3 Provide engineering design services necessary to improve $189,537 $3,067,279 odor control and automate the P7-33 clarifiers. Provide construction support services involved with additional work added in Addenda Nos. 1-3 Pending 4 Provide engineering design services necessary to add $511,045 $3,578,324 another control building, retrofit controls,and effluent monitoring, install a pilot coagulation plant, provide CMMS work and miscellaneous re-work. M:Wp.di,*Q S6 COMACTS➢14M.37 PSA Slalus RWM B&C Add p Doc 07/03/00 Revised 05114198 16755 Von Kerman.Salle 200 Irvine.CA 92606 is - ref.(949)66o4070 , ' 1 tARTMEM Fax:(949)474"0940 JOI. 0 5 2000 i%iSTRIC" June 27, 2000 � 1 c,�.,�e��knm,en9��aen�ys coy„�n�9 Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 99558-003 Subject: Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37, Changes in Scope of Work Addendum No. 4 Dear Mr. Ludwin: As discussed, we are requesting a revision to our contract to include additional scope items in Job No. P1-37. In the interest of the project schedule, we are proceeding with the design of the additional services (Items 1 through 11 and Item 15),unless directed otherwise. We suggest that funds may be reallocated to cover the additional scope items from the construction support services to prevent any delays in completion of the project design. 1. Additional Control Building Modify the current design to include two control buildings- one for the existing primary clarifiers and the other for the new clarifiers. The second control building will be similar to the first control building without washroom facilities and will be located on the east side of the center feed channel. This work will include preparation/modification of architectural, structural, HVAC, electrical and instrumentation drawings. The electrical/instrumentation work will include: • Re-locate control panels, raceways, cables, MCC's and other related electrical,instrumentation and control equipment from Electrical/Control Building currently in the contract (E/C Building 1), to a new Electrical/Control Building (E/C Building 2) currently being incorporated into the design. 102066dou _ Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 2 V • Provide power, UPS, layout, lighting, HVAC control and other details for the E/C Building 2 to correspond to equipment controlled from this new E/C Building. The cost for engineering services for changing the current design and adding one more building will be as follows: Labor and overhead $63,770 Direct costs $1,500 Profit $4,145 TOTAL $69,415 2. Retrofit of Primary Clarifier 1.5 Controls Combine controls for PC 1-5 from existing split control between two PLC's to one PLC. Support this control logic relocation by appropriate changes to panel wiring, PLC hardware, communications and panel layouts. Provide UPS and control power wiring as necessary to support the control panel loads. The cost for engineering services for design modifications to the existing PC 1-5 control system will be as follows: Labor and overhead $13,700 Direct costs $110 Profit $890 TOTAL $14,700 3a. Provide for Analytical Instrumentation for Primary Effluent Quality Monitoring Provide supporting infrastructure for procurement,installation, wiring and control for primary effluent monitoring through turbidity or suspended solids instrumentation. Include cover requirements for four instruments. Ensure instruments are included in the scope of work, but procured towards the end of construction to obtain latest,most advanced devices. Ensure control power, mounting details, control signal wiring to PLC's,and other appurtenances are in place to support the installation of the instruments at the end of construction. Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 v Page 3 3b. Procurement of VFDs Ensure VFDs are included in the scope of work, but procured towards the end of construction to obtain latest, most advanced devices. Ensure MCC, control power, mounting details, control signal wiring to PLC's, and other appurtenances are in place to support the procurement and installation of the VFDs. The cost for engineering services for this item will be: Labor and overhead $4,250 Direct costs $24 Profit $276 TOTAL $4,550 4. Pilot Polymer Control Facility District staff requested a Pilot Coagulant Control Facility to optimize the use of polymer at the primary treatment facilities. This work includes developing plans and specifications for the construction of a Pilot Coagulant Control Facility. The cost for the engineering services for developing plans and specifications for the construction of the pilot facility will be as follows: Labor and overhead $22,570 Direct costs $63 Profit $1,467 TOTAL $24,100 5. Replace the Existing Polymer PLC and Associated I/O Replace the two existing control panels with single panel housing the PLC. The cost for engineering services for changing the design will be as follows: Labor and overhead $46,312 Direct costs -- Profit $3,010 TOTAL $49,322 Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 4 6. PLC Programming for Existing Polymer and Scrubber System Prepare plans, specifications, detailed 1/0 assignment and the control descriptions to include PLC programming for the existing polymer and scrubber system.The existing scrubber system has no `as-built" documentation, therefore, this item will also include meetings with District staff,data gathering and field work for the documentation of the existing conditions. The cost for engineering services for this item will be as follows: Labor and overhead $22,458 Direct costs $1,500 Profit $1,460 TOTAL $25,418 7. PLC Programming Work (deduct) At District's request, on January 20, 2000, responsibility for providing all PLC programming and testing for the project will be assigned to the construction contractor. The cost for engineering services for providing PLC programming and testing included in or Agreement was as follows: Original Contract Addendum 3 Total Labor and Overhead $104,672 -- $104,672 Direct costs $2,000 $15,000 $17,000 Profit $6,803 -- $6,803 TOTAL $128,475 8. System Configuration for PLC Programming Prior to deletion of the PLC programming work from BC's scope, BC laid out the entire control system with detailed I/O assignment for ease of system configuration and programming. The work done will significantly decrease the amount of time the programming contractor will have to put into his design. Also, this work will further decrease the amount of work the electrical contractor will have to put into scoping and executing since it Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 5 is all paid out for him in a very detailed manner. The cost for engineering services for this item is: Labor and overhead $21,375 Direct costs $450 Profit $1,389 TOTAL $23,214 9. District's New Requirements At District's request, revise plans and specifications to meet the following new requirements: • Existing electrical loads that are refed from new MCCs be completely redesigned with controls upgraded to District's latest standards. Systems affected are the polymer (MCC-3Q and the scrubber (MCC-SA & SB) systems. • Electrical/instrumentation specifications rewriting to meet District's new Master Specifications. • Redesigning motor control schematics in accordance with District's draft standard elementary diagrams. • Redesigning remote I/O in every shipping section of the MCC rather than in a single section at the end. • Revising electrical control schematics to meet District's current standards (Appendix B-Elementary Diagrams) as requested in e-mail from Chuck Hodge dated 5-19-00. • Revise drawings and specifications to meet District's guidelines (OCSD Memorandum from Jon Thomsic dated May 18, 2000) received on April 24, 2000 regarding design of chemical facilities. Costs for items 19 and 20 from the guidelines have not been included in the cost estimate. The cost for engineering services for this item is: Labor and overhead $75,468 Direct costs -- Profit $4,905 TOTAL $80,373 Mr.David A. Ludwin,P.E. June 27,2000 H Page 6 10. Design Modifications to Provide Operational Flexibility Two meetings were held at the District on 5/22/00 and 5/23/00 to discuss the operation of all the P1-37 unit processes and systems. Several design modifications were requested by the District staff to provide operational flexibility during these meetings. Additional comments were also made by the District's O&M staff on the February 90-percent-submittal to improve operational flexibility. These included the following items: a. Revise scum skimmer controls to allow manual operation at each scum skimmer using remote setpoints. b. Revise scum skimmer controls to provide common setpoints for clarifiers by cutthroat flumes rather than allowing unique setpoints at each individual scum skimmer. C. Automate standby agitation air blower startup, provide local valve position indication for blower isolation valves. d. Add rotameter at each shear box control panel to indicate air flow. e. Add flow meter to measure flow from WSSPS to the PISB and include in the total primary influent flow for polymer pacing. Provide a weighting factor in the equation for the WSSPS flow that the operator can input. f. Eliminate cutthroat flume polymer distribution boxes and modify primary clarifier polymer distribution boxes and piping to incorporate polymer distribution to the cutthroat flumes. g. Add high water float alarm at each polymer distribution box. h. Reroute polymer suction line from Mix Tank I IHTNK060 and add isolation valve on suction manifold to isolate PCs 6-15 polymer distribution from PCs 16-31. i. Add density meters (2) for measuring sludge density from the Dilute Sludge Sumps. j. Add spray nozzles at the scum pits for automatic washdown. it. Add a PVC liner to the PCs 1-5 Distribution Box (O&M Comment 68). Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 7 1. Add sludge samplers (2) for the thickened sludge lines PS-1 and PS-2 (O&M Comment 61, General). M. Add a density meter on the thickened sludge piping (O&M Comment 63, General). n. Provide drains for the influent channels to allow drainage between the slide gates in the channels. o. Revise programming for the pilot coagulant facility to adjust the polymer dosage instead of the polymer pump speed. P. Provide flow meter for the ferric chloride discharge line. q. Provide motorized valves on the scum decant drain lines to allow remote operation during peak wet weather flows to prevent overloading the WSSPS when the scum skimmer system is flooded. The cost for engineering services for these design modifications will be as follows: Labor and overhead $33,345 Direct costs -- Profit $2,167 TOTAL $35,512 11. Plant Reinvention Reassigned Tasks Several of the Plant Reinvention comments from the J-42 workshops were reassigned to PS-37 by the District. These items were discussed at a meeting held at the District on 5/3/00 and include the following: a. Comment 11-055: Design additional lighting at the existing sump pump control panels at PCs 6-15. b. Comment 11-056: Provide plant air to the deck of PCs 6-15. C. Comment 11-060: Lower the depth of the scum baffle at PCs 6-31 to eliminate problems with grease in the primary effluent. d. Comment 11-061: Relocate the existing ultrasonic meters at the effluent channels at PCs 6-15. e. Comment 11-184: Replace the existing sludge collector drives for PCs 6-15. Mr.David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 . Page 8 U f. Comment 11-203: Relocate the emergency lighting at the Polymer Station to facilitate testing. The cost for engineering services for these reassigned tasks will be as follows: Labor and overhead $11,115 Direct costs •- Profit $722 TOTAL $11,837 12. Provide PLC Related Construction Support Services The Contractor will perform all PLC Programming and SCADA HMI Configuration. This task includes 160 professional hours to provide assistance to the District in evaluating and reviewing working drawings produced by the contractor. The cost for providing engineering services for reviewing and assistance will be: Labor and Overhead $20,520 Direct Costs $1,000 Profit $1,334 Total $22,854 13. Review of Contractors Substitutions Review and comment on the contractors submittals and shop drawings on the alternative equipment or material proposed in lieu of the named equipment manufacturers and suppliers. Th review will include all process, mechanical, and electrical/instrumentation work. We have assumed 14 substitutions for making this estimate. The cost for engineering services for reviewing the contractor's substitutions will be: Labor and Overhead $31,920 Direct Costs $50 Profit $2,074 Total $34,044 Mr. David A. Ludwin, P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 9 14. Provide Construction support services for the additional scope items identified in Addendum 4 The following additional items were included in our scope of work for the construction of the primary clarifiers and related facilities. • Retrofit of Primary Clarifiers 1-5 controls • Additional instrumentation for primary effluent quality monitoring • Pilot Polymer Control Facility • Replace the existing Polymer PLC and associated I/O • Dilute sludge and thickened sludge density meters • Sludge Samplers Construction support services for these items will include the following tasks: a. Review and approve shop drawings submitted by the contractor. b. Furnish consultation and advise District's staff in clarifying the plans and specifications (assumed 30 hours). C. Assist District in startup, initial operation and shutdown of the facilities (assumed 35 hours). d. Prepare formal revisions to construction documents for change orders as directed by the District (assumed 16 hours). e. Revise the construction plans to prepare the record drawings. f. Update existing O&M manuals to reflect changes in P1-33 facilities. g. Provide operation and maintenance training (assumed 64 hours). The con for providing construction support services will be as follows: Labor and Overhead $25,193 Direct Costs -- Profit $1,636 Total $26,829 Mr.David A. Ludwin,P.E. June 27, 2000 Page 10 15. Revise electrical plans and specifications to incorporate District's O&M's recommendations. On April 24, 2000, the District instructed BC to revise the electrical plans and specifications to incorporate the following recommendations. a. Removal of high resistance ground b. Removal of standby engine generator paralleling and synchronizing capabilities C. Addition of MCC power monitoring The cost of engineering services for the above design modifications will be: Labor and Overhead $18,500 Other Costs -- Profit $1,200 Total $19,76 16. CMMS Database On June 22, 2000,the District requested BC to create a database to store CMMS data per the District's standards outlined in an e-mail from Paul Mitchell (attached). The database will include equipment data needed for the District's CMMS database, and provide a means for logging and tracking construction submittals for the P1-37 project.Per the District's requirements,the database will include all equipment or devices over$1,000 or shown on the P&IDs. The initial database will be submitted within 90 days after award of the PSA addendum for this work.BC will be responsible for creating the database,entering the equipment and construction submittal data, and maintaining and updating the database during the construction phase. The cost for engineering services for this work is based on an estimated 4,000 equipment items as follows: Labor and overhead $183,711 Direct costs $2,000 Profit $11,941 TOTAL $197,652 J The summary of change items is: Total Cost, $ Labor and Item Overhead Direct Costs Profit Item 1 $63,770 $1,500 $4,145 Item 2 $13,700 $110 $890 Item 3 $4,250 $24 $276 Item 4 $22,570 $63 $1,467 Item 5 $46,312 -- $3,010 Item 6 $22,458 $1,500 $1,460 Item <$104,672> <$17,000> <$6,803> Item 8 $21,375 $450 $1,389 Item 9 $75,468 -- $4,905 Item 10 $33,345 -- $2,167 Item 11 $11,115 -- $722 Item 12 $20,520 $1,000 $1,334 Item 13 $31,920 $50 $2,074 Item 14 $25,193 -- $1,636 Item 15 $18,500 -- $1,200 Item 16 $183,711 $2,000 $11,941 Total $489,535 <$10,303> $.31,813 The total allowable compensation under this Agreement will be: Existing Change Per Agreement Addendum Amended as Awarded No. 4 Agreement Engineering services, (burdened labor at hourly rates plus - overhead at 110%), not to exceed $2,694,938 $489,535 Subconsultant fees and costs, not to exceed $33,600 -- $33,600 Direct costs $164,000 <$10,303> $153,697 Profit $174,741 $31,813 $206,554 Total, not to exceed $3,067,279 $511,045 $3,578,324 roiossaa< 0 For breakdown of cost and manhours for the above tasks, see Attachment A. We would be pleased to discuss this estimate with you at your convenience. Please call me or Azee Malik if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BROWN AND CALDWELL Robert M. Finn, P.E. Vice President AM:RF �axost.da Attachment A Cost and Manhour Breakdown Cost E Task Description P Hrs T Hrs C Hrs Labor&OHI Direct Costs Profit 1. Additional Control Building 1.1 Electric /7nstnimentation Drawings 260 202 12 $45494 $1500 $2957 L2 Smemmtl/AmlMqualM 80 40 $1 78 $798 L3 Retire 4=6 ' Malwmtlms1HVAC 25 40 4 S 008 $798 Subtotal $63770 $1500 $4145 2. Retrofit of Primary Clarifier 1-5 Control 94 34 4 $13 00 $110 $890 3. Additional Instrumentation 22 23 1 84 50 $24 $276 4. Pilot Polymer Control Facility 130 103 8 $22 70 $63 $1467 S. Re lace the Existin Ivener PLC and Associated I/O Instrumentation&Connrcl 250 150 $46 312 $3 010 6. PLC Programming for Existing Polymer and Scrubber S stems Exi ' Pol and Scrubber System 120 80 40 $22458 $1500 $1460 7. PLC Programming Work Original contact <$104 672> 000> < 03> Addendum 3 <$15 000> S. System Configuration for PLC Programming Controls em 60 180 $21375 $450 $1389 9. District's New Requirements Control Upgrades Due to New MCCs 60 32 Specifications Rewrite to Meet District's New Specs 32 40 Redesign Motor Contml Schanaucs 40 24 Redesign Rewrote VO m WE Sections 32 40 Revise Electical control schematics 25 15 Revise drawings and specifications to meet latest District 200 190 30 'defines on chemical facilities. Subtotal 3891 341 30 $75468 $4905 10.Design Modifications to Provide Operational Flexibility Modify drawings,specifications,QA/QC 160 120 20 $33,345 - $2,167 11.Plant Reinvention Reassigned Tasks Modify drawings,specifications,WQC 48 48 4 $11,115 $722 12.Provide PLC related construction suppott services 160 $20,520 $1,000 $1,334 13.Review of contractors substitutions 280 $31,920 $50 $2,074 p\wp\pmpodr\"558-003V02066A.chA.dx Attachment A Cost and Manhour Breakdown cost $ Task Descri Non P Hrs T Hrs C Hrs Labor&OH Direct Costs Profit 14. Provide construction support services for the additional scope items a Sh0 Drawin b.Advise District Staff 30 4 c.Assist in Stamt 35 $259 d.Po rev lions to construction document 16 16 6 $209 e.Record drawings 4 16 $104 f.Update O&M Manuals 60 16 6 $535 g.Operation and maintenance training 40 $296 Subtotal 185 48 16 $25 193 $1 636 15.Revisions to the electrical plans&Specifications a.Removal of high resistance ground 24 24 8 $5,000 $325 b.Removal of stand by engine generator 64 40 8 $11,000 $715 c.Addition of MCC Power Monitoring 16 8 2 $2,500 $160 Subtotal 104 72 18 $18,500 $1,200 16.CMMS Database a.Create database 40 100 20 $16,131 b.Duct entry 100 2,000 $112,575 c.Verily data,obtain missing data 500 100 $55,005 Subtotal 40 700 2120 $183711 E2000 E11941 TOTAL $469 535 <$10 03> E31813 pAwp\p rwosd s\9955 8 W3\1D20 GA=hkdx PDC COMMITTEE MeeBngDate To ad.ofoo-. 8/3/00 8/23/000 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe ItemN er ucoo e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud vector of Engineering Originator: Jonathan Thomsic, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT, JOB NO. J42 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 7, to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job. No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$1,896,186 for a total amount not to exceed $7,495,779. SUMMARY Job No. J-42, the Plant Reinvention Project, will automate portions of the Orange County Sanitation District (District's)two treatment plants and modify plant processes to optimize performance, improve reliability, and increase the amount of process information available to Staff, thereby lowering overall costs. Phase 1 of the project is documenting the existing control systems and generating Staff reinvention ideas. Documentation of the control system reduces the cost of design, increases plant reliability, allows the proper management of plant assets, provides the plant operators with the information they need to understand, control and optimize the wastewater process, and supports DART reinvention. Several additional benefits from good control system documentation have been realized; this documentation now supports OSHA- mandated safety procedures, the Computerized Maintenance Management System permanent identification system, and documents small, auxiliary control systems that were previously undocumented. More than 90% of the Phase 1 expenditures are for documenting the existing control systems. The scope of Phase 1 was known to be somewhat uncertain at the beginning of the project because no accurate estimate of the drawing count could be made. The District and Parsons Engineering Science negotiated a base quantity and a unit cost for the deliverable documentation as part of the original contract. Now that the project is 65% complete, Staff and the Consultant can accurately estimate the quantity of drawings required to complete the project. This Addendum implements the pre-negotiated unit costs for the additional drawings that are needed to properly complete the plant documentation. The net effect is an increase in contract cost by $1,896.186. A� f 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CAA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This Addendum transfers $1,898,206 from the contingency budget to the Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) budget, and authorizes an increase of the Consultant PSA funds from $5,599,593 to $7,495,779. No increase in the overall project budget is necessary. See the attached Budget Information Table for further information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, was created to: (1)develop documentation for the existing automation and controls systems; (2) provide a workshop format for the reinvention of plant operation and automation; and (3) develop and implement plant automation to an optimum level. Through this project, the operation and maintenance of the Orange County Sanitation District (District's) two treatment plants will be reinvented to: • Provide Operations with data that is currently not available, which will allow optimal process control and ongoing operations. • Provide Maintenance with information to better manage and maintain plant equipment and controls. • Reduce operating costs by using chemicals more effectively and reduce staffing levels by application of automation and centralized monitoring and control. • Provide a more efficient and cost-effective design process because of accurate and up-to-date documentation of existing conditions. • Additional benefits from improved control system documentation are support for the OSHA-mandated Lock-Out/Tag-Out procedures and application of universal tag number identification to all process equipment and instrumentation. The Plant Automation/Reinvention Project is divided into four phases: • Phase 1 gathers Reinvention/Automation Ideas. In this phase, the plant control system is documented and reinvention ideas are listed. Phase 1 is now in progress with an expected completion date of March 2001. • Phase 2 is the execution of further study, benefit/cost analysis, optimization and the development of Preliminary Engineering Assessment Reports (PEARS) for selected ideas. The Board approved the first stage of the Phase 2 effort in July 2000. • Phase 3 and 4 include the detailed design and construction of ideas that yield a payback of 5 years or less. Approximately one-third of the J-42 budget provides new information about the treatment process that is essential for short and long term planning of the plant control Y system. Engineers cannot effectively plan or design control systems without complete and accurate information. Comprehensive automation drawings were not developed in the past; thus, Engineering has neither general or detail information about the control system. About 90% of the Phase 1 effort is to document the existing plant control systems by creating five engineering documents; Process & Instrumentation Diagrams, Instrumentation Loop Diagrams, Control Logic Diagrams, and Equipment and Instrument Data Sheets. Plant documentation was an Important element in the original Agenda Report. Benefits derived from good documentation include: • Reduction in the cost of future designs because the design consultants will be able to rely on the District drawings for correct information. • Maintenance effort is significantly reduced when the District technicians can confidently refer to accurate control system documentation. • The Computerize Maintenance Management System will more accurately reflect actual conditions and so will become more effective. • Operations will be better able to understand how the plant control systems work; this will reduce training time for new operators and increase reliability under abnormal conditions. • Safety will be increased because Staff will better understand how the plant operates and thus be better able to avoid unsafe operation. The plant documentation has become more important to the District as new ways to use the documentation were identified during the course of the project: • The Process & Instrumentation Diagrams now generate the permanent loop tag numbers used by the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Lock- Out/Tag-Out procedures and the Process Control Integration group. Every valve and system component is shown on the drawings to support this work. • The Lock-Out/Tag-Out procedures are also supported by including all indicator lights and annunciators that normally do not show on a Process & Instrumentation Diagram as well as all valves rather than just the large valves. • Some equipment that is typically not documented, such as sump pumps and ventilation fans, is properly documented to support ongoing maintenance. Phase 1 was identified at the beginning of the project as the phase with the highest risk because it was not possible to accurately estimate either the quantity or the content of the required drawings. The original contract included a unit cost and a base drawing count used as the basis for the cost estimate. The negotiated unit prices include all costs. Table 1-- Original Drawing Estimate is extracted from the original contract. Table 1 — Original Drawing Estimate Deliverable Number Add For Deduct For Included in Base Increase above Decrease Below Contract Base Number Base Number Loop Diagrams 5000 $510 $398 Control Logic Diagrams Existing CLDs 376 $595 $464 New CLDs 124 $1.530 $1.193 TOTAL: 500 P&IDs Existing P&IDs 110 $1,530 $1,193 New P&IDs 190 $6,800 $5,304 TOTAL: 300 Table 1 refers to both Existing P&IDs and New P&IDs. The existing P&ID quantity has been met under the original contract and does not enter into the cost calculations for this Addendum. Each of the contract drawing types (P&IDs, ILDs, and CLDs) have been generated for five process areas and a survey of the required number of drawings to completely document both plants has recently been conducted. Parsons Engineering Science and Staff have accurately estimated the type and number of drawings required to complete documentation of the plant processes. The accurate estimated quantities are used with the negotiated unit costs to create Table 2 — Drawing Estimate as of June 2000 with costs. Table 2 is the current estimate for the additional cost to complete Phase 1 of Job No. J-42. Table 2 — Drawing Estimate as of June, 2000 with costs Deliverable Estimated Charge in Contract Change in total number number of unit cost contract cost of drawings dravrin s Loop 4,707 -293 $398 -$116,614 Diagrams Control Logic 500 — — 0 Diagrams P&IDs 596 996 $6,800 $2,012,800 TOTAL: 5,803 — — $1,896,186 A 25% discount in consulting fees was negotiated for the original contract. This discount will be maintained. This will be accomplished by requiring Parsons to invoice e the base contract price of$4,383,400 at the discounted rate before invoicing for this Addendum. The additional work covered by this addendum has caused the project schedule to change. The original scheduled completion was for July 2000. Nine months will be added to the schedule with completion scheduled for March 2001. ALTERNATIVES No other alternatives have been identified as this project represents the recommendations of the DART process. In addition, lack of project documentation will now significantly affect the Lock Out/Tag Out procedures and the Computerized Maintenance Management System. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Report that was certified on October 27, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report JKT:jo:jak OmWlWa ft191obaMpanda Daft Report5VT ,142 AR Wd#7.080300.dm BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Addendum No. 7 Job No. J-42 ORIGINAL PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED CURRENT BUDGET, REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENbkb' BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%): Project Development $ 185,180 $ 185,180 $ 185,180 $ 185.180 $ 185,180 $ 185,180 100% Design Staff $ 2,961.531 $ 3.333.531 $ 3,333,531 $ 3.333,631 $ 3,333,537 1$ 1.460,919 44% Consultant PSA $ 4,383,400 $ 5,599,593 $1,896.18B $ 7,495,779 $ 5,599,593 $ 1,896.186 $ 7.495.779 1$ 3,556,059 47% Construction Contract $ 8.698,472 $ 8,696,472 $ 8,696.472 $ 0% Construction Other) $ 600000 $ 600.000 $ 600.000 $ 0% Construction Staff $ 4,030,000 $ 4,030.000 $ 4,030,000 $ 0% lConfingency $ 4,903,417 $ 3.397,987 $ 1,896,186 $ 1,501,801 $ 0% TOTAL $ 25.760,000 $ 25,842,763 $ - $ 25,842,763 $ 9,118,304 $ 1.896.188 1 $ 11,014,490 $ 5,202,158 H:% P.dtaingUOBS a WNTRACTSU42 Flan ReinvBMiwn andum 7-Fx DrawirgcVBulget Table Add 47 rev 01.x1e1d42 Forth Rvised IV17M Professional Services Agreement Status Report PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT JOB NO. J-42 Total Project Budget: $25,760,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 27, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs J-42 is the Plant Reinvention and Automation Project that will increase plant automation to an 5/2 711 9 98 Original optimum level. It is a capital project that will $4,383,400 $4,383,400 PSA implement physical changes to the plant process control systems and equipment to support both Operations and Maintenance 4/1/1999 1• Provide facilitator for Area 10/20 Workshop 1 $16,500 $4,399,900 7/21/1999 2 Additional Miscellaneous Services $80,537 $4,480,437 7/21/1999 3 Plant Tagging Services $616,393 $5,096,830 10/26/1999 4' Correction to Agreement Language $0 $5,096,830 4/26/2000 5 Virtual Tags $420,000 $5,516,830 7/26/2000 6 Phase 2 Vision and Goals $82,763 $5,599,593 Pending 7 Drawing Count Adjustment $1,896,186 $7,495,779 ' GM Approval U:NIgi"A,9ntls IXeM1 PCPMs%PM 42 M add M.OBO]N.WC.tld P : M98 Page 7 V PDC COMMITTEE MmUng Date Tosd.ofDr. W03/00 0823/00 A Number Item Nu Oeo.-bl F AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation Di 'R FROM: David Lu irector of Engineering Originator: Andrei loan, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $3,332,829. SUMMARY Approximately four miles of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) are located along the Santa Ana River within the cities of Yorba Linda, Anaheim, Chino Hills, and in unincorporated areas of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Based on several engineering studies, Staff has concluded that the pipeline and manholes could potentially fail, due to streambed degradation in an extraordinary flood event. The Consultant is to provide engineering services to relocate the SARI line outside of the riverbed and abandon the existing line. The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), Construction Documents and Construction Support Services. Tasks include, but are not limited to, utility research, geotechnical investigation, aerial and field surveying, permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support services for the contract. Staff received proposals from the following five fines on July 12, 2000: Brown and Caldwell; Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.; Montgomery Watson; CH2MHILL; and Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals on July 17, 2000 and interviewed all five firths on July 18, 2000. Staff recommends approval of a PSA for the engineering, design and construction support services for the relocation and protection of the SARI line with Brown and Caldwell for an amount not to exceed $3,332,829. The design work will take ten months to complete and will begin within two weeks after approval of the PSA. The completion of construction work is estimated to be October 1, 2003. Page 1 y PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, is $49,787.000. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. The total funds authorized to date, including amounts allocated to the Professional Services Agreements with Consultants other than Holmes & Narver, are summarized below: Firm PSA, Including Addenda Holmes & Narver $465,089 Glenn Lukos & Associates $39,845 Carl Nelson $37,200 K.S. Dunbar $166,000 TOTAL $708,134 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2000101 Budget Section 6,Page 6 and 21, Contract No.241) ❑ This Item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this contract. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI), generally parallels the Santa Ana River from the Orange/San Bernardino County line to Plant Nos. 1 and 2, for a distance of approximately 23 miles. The SARI line extending east from the Weir Canyon Road to the Orange County/San Bernardino County line runs mostly within the Santa Ana River floodplain and crosses beneath the river at several locations. The SARI line serves Riverside and San Bernardino Counties under the administration of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA has capacity rights of 30 mgd in the SARI line downstream of the San Bernardino/Orange County line. When the SARI line was constructed in 1975, it was buried about 15 to 20 feet below the then existing riverbed elevation. The SARI line located within the Santa Ana River floodplain is vulnerable to damage caused by flooding and riverbed erosion. Streambed degradation is now posing a threat of structural damage to the pipeline. Access to the manholes is also difficult due to heavy growth of riparian habitat. An extensive riverbed erosion analysis was performed in 1996 to determine the potential extent of damages to the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) line under a major flood event. Holmes& Narver prepared the report under Contract No. 2-14-5R2. The report indicated R.W: v 0 Page 2 W that the Santa Ana riverbed has degraded due to flooding and entrapment of sediment in the Prado Dam Reservoir located just northeast of the Orange County/San Bernardino County line. Consequently, there has been significant erosion near the manholes and reduction in the depth of cover over the pipeline. In addition, additional significant erosion will occur when flows up to 30,000 cis are released from the Prado dam, after the Corps of Engineers raises the dam. According to the report, the SARI line will be washed out at several locations and some manholes will be completely unburied and very likely destroyed. Any damage to manholes would allow a devastating influx of sand and debris into the SARI line with serious consequences to the District's plants. The large amount of silt and debris that could enter the SARI line(in case of a washout), would induce a significant blockage at the headworks, large enough to potentially render the District's plants inoperable for days. According to surveys performed in 1994 and 1998, the riverbed changed course and has been eroded from its state at the construction of the SARI line. In 1994, the minimum cover over the pipe at some river crossings was estimated at 7 to 8 feet, and the maximum cover was less than 13 feet. In 1998, after the El Niho storms, the minimum cover at certain locations was 2.9 to 3.2 feet, and maximum cover was 7.7 feet. On the average, the cover over the pipe decreased by 0.7 feet per year since construction of the line in 1975. Under current flow conditions, before Prado Dam is raised, the pipeline may be exposed in as little as four to five years (2004 or 2005). In April 2000, a realignment study was completed. The study evaluated five relocation alternatives for the SARI line. Prior to the realignment study, Homes and Narver evaluated a protection alternative as part of the erosion analysis prepared in 1996. The protection alternative consists of four grade stabilizers constructed at selected locations, across the river. Below is a summary of the realignmentiprotection alternatives: Alternative Alternative Description A Relocate the middle section of the affected reach and build two grade stabilizers at the ends. B1 Relocate the middle and upper(upstream)section of the affected reach and build a grade stabilizer at the lower end. B2 Relocate the lower(downstream) and middle sections of the affected SARI reaches and build one grade stabilizer. C Relocate the entire pipeline out of the river, build no stabilizers, and keep the brines from SAWPA and the domestic sewage separate. D Relocate the entire pipeline out of the river, build no stabilizers, and keep the brines from SAW PA and the domestic sewage in the same line. Grade Protect the pipeline in place by constructing four grade stabilizers in Stabilizers only the river. On May 2, 2000, Staff met to discuss available alignment options. Staff agreed that the grade stabilizers might be subject to failure and, therefore, do not offer the highest level of reliability. Construction of the grade stabilizers within the Santa Ana River will have significant environmental impacts, including disturbance to the riverbed and wildlife habitat. Review and permits will be required from the U. S. Corps of Engineers, California Page 3 Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish &Wildlife, State Water Resources Control Board, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Construction timing is also dictated by environmental concerns. All other Alternatives were evaluated with respect to the level of reliability and environmental impact. Cost, feasibility, and scheduling were also discussed. At the end of the meeting, the consensus was that Alternative"D"was environmentally superior and is the most reliable and practical approach. On July 6, 2000, the relocation/protection alternatives were presented to the PDC Committee. The committee members acknowledged that Alternative "D" is the most appropriate choice. Proposal Evaluation Five firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. All five firms submitted proposals on July 12, 2000: Brown and Caldwell; Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.; Montgomery Watson, CH2MHILL; and Sverdrup Civil, Inc. The proposals were evaluated and ranked by Staff. Brown and Caldwell (B&C) had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach, solid understanding of the Scope of Work, detailed permitting plan, ability to meet the Districts' schedule and similar project experience. B&C researched the project and demonstrated their understanding expressed in their analyses of the critical project issues and cost considerations. B&C identified potential construction impacts in the cities of Anaheim, Yorba Linda and Chino Hills and recommended solutions to mitigate these impacts during construction. B&C outlined a detailed public outreach program and provided alternative backup plans of action for critical issues such as railroad permitting. B&C proposed fee was the second lowest, however, their proposal was rated significantly higher than the lowest cost proposal. Staff unanimously ranked B&C the highest. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA ACTION The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)was certified on July 19, 2000. A Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2000. The document has been designated as an EIR/EIS. The EIS designation refers to an Environmental Impact Statement that is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)for Federally funded projects. The EIR/EIS is structured to focus on analysis of alternatives consistent with the provisions of NEPA. Since the Santa Ana Watershed Authority may consider seeking low interest loan funding or grants to pay for some of their share of the project costs, the Federal EIS approval process may be required. That process would be carried out by the Federal lead agency, such as the Environmental Protection ��dzaae Page 4 d Agency. In the interim, Orange County Sanitation District (District) will continue to work with the necessary Federal agencies involved in permitting and/or funding of this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services 4. Figure 1, Location Map AI:HK:jo:jak \�baltltlablW&baMgenea D2fl Report TDW41 080300.dm .a Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection Contract No. 2.41 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECTRASK AUTHOR GET BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPE)IDED.(FY 00-01( INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEI%) Pro ect Develo menl $ 17,000 $ 17 000 $ - $ 17.000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 12,871 76% Design Staff $ 366,200 $ 1963000 $ - $ 1,953,000 $ 633,000 $ 1.320000 $ 1,953.000 $ 99,243 5% Consultant PSA $ 875000 It 2.786.000 $ 1.254.9631 $ 4,040.963 $ 708.134 1 $ 3.332.829 $ 4.040.963 1 $ 602,554 15% Construction Contract $ 21,203.400 $ 33.000,000 $ - $ 33,000.000 $ $ - $ 0% ConsWC80n Other $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ 0% Construction Steff $ 2,980.300 $ 4.431,000 $ - $ 4431.000 $ $ - $ 0% Conlin en $ 5.088,400 8 7.600,000 $ 1,254,963 $ 6,345,037 $ $ 0% TOTAL $ 30.530 300 1 $ 49,787,000 $ - $ 49.787.000 1 1$ 1.358.134 $ 4.652.829 1$ 6.010.963 $ 714.668 12% R.Ww d1aWgUOSSS CONTRACTWAlSMI REALIGNMEN71B4C DESIG18[241 Final Oeftn PSA-Brown Cel4well xlelDlclrklc Fo.R.AW 1017188 Lent pnnteE 0712U20002:36 PM Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 Total Project Budget: $3,332,829 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: September 4, 2000 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs Pending Original PSA Design Relocation and Protection, and $3.332,829 $3,332,829 Abandonment of The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 241 H.1 pAtaWnBUOBS&CONTRACTSU41 SARI REAUGNMENT B&C DESIGN1241 PSA Status Remrt.B&C.dee Al:jo:jak SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION & PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 The following interested firms received a Request for Proposals sent out on June 16, 2000: • Brown and Caldwell • Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. • Montgomery Watson • CH2MHILL • Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Proposals were received from all five consulting firms on July 12, 2000. Proposals were then distributed for review and ranking by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of seven members. The review panel met on July 17, 2000, and discussed the results of the evaluation. Interviews were conducted on July 18, 2000. The Consultants were evaluated based upon the proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Profect Approach and Understandina of the Scope of Work. Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performina the Work. Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Profect Experience. Rates the team's overall total number of year's experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to design of sewers. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design of sewers. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to design of sewers. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team. 6. Proposed Schedule. Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule? Each Consultant's "List of Assumptions and Exceptions to the Scope of Work"were evaluated as to whether the assumptions and exceptions were acceptable. W The five consulting firms were then ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the five firms (See Table 1.0): 1. Brown and Caldwell 2067 Points 2. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 1837 Points 3. Montgomery Watson 1802 Points 4. CH2MHILL 1751 Points 5. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 1651 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked Consultant. Brown and Caldwell (B & C) Brown and Caldwell had the highest-ranked proposal based on, meeting the Districts' schedule, project approach, understanding of the scope of work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. B & C's understanding and analyses of the critical project issues including permitting and the ability to complete the project ahead of the Districts' schedule was the best compared to all of the other Consultants. Several good ideas highlighted in B & C's proposal included a detailed permitting plan, traffic and safety impacts, alternative backup plans to deal with railroad issues, and an extensive public outreach plan. The Staffs' qualifications presented were good, and B & C staff had the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project teams, including the sub-consultants, were well organized based upon specialties and division of work. Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the five firms. The top ranked consultant, Brown and Caldwell, submitted the second lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Brown and Caldwells' fee proposal is 40% higher than the lowest fee proposal submitted by Montgomery Watson, the third ranked Consultant. Staff recommends Brown and Caldwell be awarded the PSA for the Santa Ana River Interceptor River Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, for a total fee not to exceed $3,332,829. HK:jak Wwp.dIatengWBS&CONTRACTS@-41 SARI REALIGNMENTIB&C DESIGN@-41 staff ewluatlon.S&CAoc TABLE 1.0 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Parsons Brown and Engineering Montgomery Sverdrup Caldwell Science, Inc. Watson CH2MHILL Civil, Inc. Reviewer A 299 276 283 282 252 Reviewer 286 227 200 218 182 Reviewer C 299 285 278 250 203 Reviewer D 301 267 260 213 237 Reviewer 309 285 257 260 242 Reviewer F 291 277 273 288 270 Reviewer G 282 220 251 240 265 Total Score 2067 1837 1802 1751 1651 2450 Points Maximum Average Score 295 262 257 250 235 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 22,561 28,816 20,521 24,156 32,611 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 41 41 39 38 40 Weeks Proposed Not To Exceed Fee $3,332,829 $3,811,465 $2,386,077 $3,183,372 $3,750,584 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date To Bd.of Dlr. DB/23/00 AGENDA REPORT kemNumber rtem/Mrber Orange County Sanitation District 5� FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 2000. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy, The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Rr ed„ . arz a Ww avu�z,o�. vnHawna000w�ar,v: r:Aewn ca an,:eeoee Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-tens and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. On July 31, $22 million was withdrawn from the Lang-Term Operating Monies portfolio to fund semi-annual debt service payments for the District's COP borrowings. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts July 31.2000 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $ 12,480.873 6A Union Bank Checking Account 398,800 --- Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 6,619,000 5.3 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 33,134,088 6A PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 334,839.455 5.3 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,069 6.4 Debt Service Reserves Q Trustees 32,159,427 6.6 Petty Cash 8,000 — TOTAL $419,641.712 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report ,vaaamacunm avU ¢rmmmrurmr.orz000wercreamr.n.00n.ao nmua erzo,se Page 2 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ���������� VZZZOOI ..... ..... ...•, ..... .❖.❖.� ❖.•.�.�, ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... , , , , , , , .❖.❖a .❖.❖a :❖.❖o ..... ..... ..... ..... X..... :.... .... ❖. ❖.•.� . ..... :.... ..... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... INE INE ME ME ME ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 31 July 2000) Liquid Operating Maniet(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $33,132,511 • Mellon S33,134,088 Historical Cost: • PIMCO S33,130,147 • Mellon S33,129,905 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 024 Of index: 0.20 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( aintloss)of 1%Charge: $80,391 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 58% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Averse Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below eA": See Note 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" See Note 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.57 0.48 3 Months: 1.68 1.45 12 Months: 6.07 5AI Year-to-Date: 3.76 3.30 Conrmenmry • Interest rates tithe short-end of the yield curve rose in July(three-monm T-Bills up 37 basis points to 6.22%),while the long<nd posted decreases(30-ycm Treasuries down 1 I basis polo to 5.78%). • The Liquid portfolio oulperfored its benchmark by 9 basis polo in July,and outperformed by 46 basis points year-w-date. • PIMCO's emphasis on commercial paper and short-term news enhanced returns. • NOTE: On Just 15,5&P downgraded ICI Wilmington(a petrochemical firm)from A.to BBB+due to a slower that expected pace of business impressment following their$8 billion debt-franced acquisition ofUnilever in 1998. An ICI Wilmington debenture,$1,000,000 paramount.9.5%coupon,mmurbeg on November 15,2000,is held in the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio. The note comprise about 3%of the S33 million faradic. PIMCO's credit item has analysed the ICI Wilmington credit and reported on July 7: "ICI hea drammwally reduxd ib debt burden vies t sales and strategic pml"erships(.S2 billion since 1998). We view iCl as a solid credit with an improving business pmfile. Therefore,we recommend that duet the portfolio continues to hold this security until'maturity.- The FAlla Committee concur d with this recommendation at their July 12,200 meeting. N:L.1F/NANCfl_.IREV/SFL Il4'a"OaaYT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING 0or the month ending 31 July 2000) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $335,292,499 • Mellon $334,839,455 Historical Cost: $335,513.552 • PIMCO $336,629,916 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.00 Of Index: 2.25 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of I%Change: $6,766,826 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Ponfolio in Reverse Rems: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY •/of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 40% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate ofRemm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.59 0.71 3 Months: 2.23 2.34 12 Months: 5.92 5.19 Year-to-Date: 4.17 3.71 Commentary While Ilnee-month yields rose during July(90-day T-Bills up 37 basis points to 6.22%),yields on longer maturities declined(5-year Treasury Notes down 3 buis points to 6.19%). The Long-Term ponfolto undeperformed its benchmark by 12 basis points in July,but has oulperformed by 46 basis points year-to-date. PIMCO',decision to underweight corporate notes detracted slightly from ponfotio returns,as corporates outperformed other sectors. PIMCO's decision to hold inflation-protection wads enhanced=to=as this segment outperformed intermediate Treasuries. Holdings ofmongoge backed securities detracted from relative returns w this sector underperformed Treasuries. H:1 µ'/NMCflr/A..W£V/SFD Lm'a1 RPT Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE" i BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-.NL-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 4,932,169.67 4,932,169.67 14.72% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 4,729,618.06 4,729,618.06 14.12% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 1,878,778.44 1,878,77B.44 5.61% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN 1 YR 5,635,726.57 5,635,726.57 16.92% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 112,401,48 112,401.48 0.34% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 17,288,694.22 17,288,694.22 51.61% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 17,2 17,288,694.22 51.61% 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,526,781.25 6,561,852.00 19.59% 35,070.75 U.S.AGENCIES 270,799.06 272,379.25 0.91% 1,590.19 ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 900,243.00 2.69% -5,670.00 BANKING&FINANCE 6,206,942.05 6,202,923.20 19.52% 4,118.85 INDUSTRIAL 922,360.00 907,011.00 2.71% -15,849.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,845.00 497,430.00 1.48% 1,585.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 512,080.00 503,655.00 1.50% -8,425.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 15,841,210.36 15,845,393.45 47.30% 4,183.09 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 15,841,210. 15".393.45 47.30% 4,183.09 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 364,205.14 364,205.14 1.09% 0.00 TOTAL 364.205.14 364,205.14 1.09% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 364,205.14 364,205.14 -emu 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 33,494,109.72 33,498,292.81 100.00% 4,183.09 08-Au&2000 10:36:22 &.tim Wmkba h Q II ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE• I NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASS USD OCSF07522202 31-JUL-2000 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILM CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 6,677,690.25 6,677,690.25 1.98% 0.00 PAYABLES -28,267,343.75 -28,267,343.75 -8.36% 0.00 TOTAL -21,589,653.50 -21,589,653.50 .6.39% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 45,543,466.72 45,543,466.72 13.47% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 29,039,716.67 29,039,716.67 8,59% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN I YR 1,869,512.39 1,869,512.39 0.55% 0.00 FED IDA LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 2,662,092.00 2,662,092.00 0.79% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 150,337.47 150,337.47 0.04% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 79,265,125.25 79,265,125.25 23.45% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 57,675,471.75 57,675,471.75 17.86% 0.60 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 32,76070.35 32,697,624.60 9.67% -73,745.75 U.S.AGENCIES 86,800,905.72 86,516,032.95 25.60% -284,872.77 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 21,592,212.94 21,518,000.00 6.37% -74,212.94 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 14,331,110.58 14,295,377.20 4.23% -35,733.38 FHLMC POOLS 8,644,091.24 8,460,283.34 2.50% -183,807.90 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,469,954.96 7,232,421.17 2.14% •237,533.69 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 20,740.07 20,68823 0.01% -51.84 ABS:HOME EQUITY 270,78526 269,431.33 0.08% -IX3.93 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS Z485,040.44 2,476,594.12 0.73% -8,446.32 MUTUALFUNDS 1,000,000.00 991,850.00 0.29% -8,150.00 BANKING&FINANCE 70,204,955.21 69,941,994.46 20,66% -362,960.75 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,946,321.25 2.03% -279,867,75 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,096,080.00 7,951,150.00 2.35% -144,930.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,298,832.00 2.16% -1,168.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,344,450.00 2.17% -152,805.00 G.0.CITY/MUNI 1,723,280.00 1,742,800.00 0.52% 19,520.00 .HOSPITAL 1,630,474.05 1,670,132.60 0.49% 39.658.55 09-Aug-1000 10:37.28 Ecaut1w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 314UL-2000 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS TOTAL UNITED STATES 278,954,444.72 277,163,993.25 82.00% .1,790,461.47 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 27 , 5 , . 277,1 25 ELM -1,790,46IA7 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESALECEIVABLES 3,161,511.73 3,161,511.73 0.94% 0.00 TOTAL 3,161,511.73 3,161,511.73 0.94% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS J,1 1,SI I.7 �3,i 1,511.73 0.94% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 339,791,428.20 338,000,966.73 100.00% -1,790,461.47 08-Aug1000 10.37:28 F,e,.,v Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSP07511102 2000/07/31 RUN DATE t 08/04/00 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 1 14.02.18 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 112,401.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HURT .000 6.323 AAA 100.000 112,401.40 .65 906065247 AAA 112,401.18 .34 1,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN DISC NT 6.494 .000 P-1 99.018 1,386,246.94 8.01 313SOBB46 NAY O6/09/2000 A-1a 1,386,246.54 4.18 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BK CONS DISC 6.549 .000 P-1 98.495 1,575,920.00 9.11 213384F40 HAT 09/08/2000 A-1♦ 1,575,920.00 4.36 2,500,000.00 PEDERAL MOM LN MINI COMP DISC 6.561 .000 P-1 9B.453 2,461,419.44 14.23 313396FSI HAT 09/14/2000 A-1♦ 2,461,419.44 3.43 900,000.00 MIKE INC DISC 6.539 .000 P-1 98.951 990,560.50 5.15 6541D2J66 09/06/2000 690,560.50 2.99 800,000.00 SECTOR DICKINSON DISC 6.581 .000 P-1 9B.915 791,320.00 4.57 03588N89 09/08/2000 791,320.00 2.39 200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC NY 6.586 .000 P-1 98.7DO 197,400.00 1.14 313588F91 HAT 09/15/2000 A-I+ 197,400.00 .60 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN NTG CORP DISC 6.590 .000 P-1 98.496 984,856.67 5.69 313396G22 MAY 09/21/2000 A-I♦ 984,856.67 2.93 600,000.00 EASTMAN ROOM CO DI BC 6.626 .ODD P-1 98.813 592,904.17 3.42 23746ANP3 08/23/2000 592,904.17 1.39 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLRR DI BC 6.640 .000 98.492 086,429.50 5.12 2338E0JS6 09/26/2000 886,429.50 2.68 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 6.652 .000 P-1 96.310 884.394.50 5.11 38142TKJ3 10/18/2000 894,794.50 2.63 300,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL KID ASSN DISCOUNT 6.633 .000 P-1 98.333 295,131.50 1.70 313588K46 MAT 10/12/2000 A-1• 295,131.50 .89 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL NOR: IN MINI CAP DISC N 6.636 .000 P-1 98.219 1,283,341.95 7.41 313396A45 MAY O0/0112000 A-1a 1,283,341.95 3.07 900,000.00 MOTOROLA INC DISC 6.693 .000 P-1 98.462 896,161.00 5.12 62008AJL4 09/20/2000 686,161.00 2.63 YLD&ML YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSM7511102 2000/07/31 RUN DATE i 09/04/00 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 14.02.18 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NGGDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOUR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE a TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 4,109,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KID ASSN DISC NTH 8.389 .G00 P-1 98.803 4,059,806.57 13.48 31358BA62 NAT O8/03/2000 A-1+ 4,059,806.57 12.25 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.539 .OBI 17,288,694.22 100.00 17,288,694.22 52.18 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.205 4.023 AAA 99.422 6,526,781.25 41.41 9120274T6 04.0001 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/98 AAA 6,561,852.00 19.90 900,000.00 FORD HIE CR MTN 1 TR 00530 6.312 3.DI8 A2 100.027 905,913.00 5.68 345402YKI 3.0201 10/10/2000 DO 10/10/95 A 900,243.00 2.32 400,ODO.00 LENMAN MOB HLDGS HER TR 00252 6.353 6.4D3 A3 99.955 400,216.00 2.52 52517PLMI 6.400% O0/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 A 399,920.00 1.21 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP HIS 6.425 9.551 A2 100.779 922,860.00 5.72 370442AHS 1.625% 12/02/2000 DO 12/01/90 A 907,011.00 2.74 150,000.00 MURGAH 3 P 6 CO MEN SR 00043 6.430 6.132 Al 99.990 149,625.DO .94 61687YWO 6.125% 10/02/2000 DO 10/02/97 AA 149,835.00 .45 500,000.00 GTE CORP DEB 6.669 9.30I A2 100.I31 512,080.00 3.13 362320AQ6 9.335% 12/01/2000 A+ 503,655.00 1.52 475,000.00 FIRMA CAP CORP 6.920 6.451 BAA2 98.828 473,031.25 2.96 318074AFS 6.335% 10/15/2000 DO 10/11/95 BOB. 469,433.00 1.42 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTH 1 SR O0010 6.862 5.674 Al 99.142 173,393.00 1.09 12560QMS 5.625% 02/02/2001 OD 02/02/96 A+ 173,498.50 .52 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MIN /TR 00006 6.899 6.202 A3 99.486 495,045.00 3.13 902690AF6 6.1704 03/01/2001 DO 03/06/98 A- 497,430.D0 1.50 275,000.OD FEDERAL HOME LN HE CONS BDS 7.058 5.189 AAA 99.043 270,709.06 1.71 3133H6EA2 5.1404 05/02/2001 DD 11/02/98 AAA 272,375.25 .82 1,000,000.00 ICI WILMINGTON INC DID NT 3.344 9.457 BAA1 100.459 1,008,400.00 6.33 449909MB 9.500% 11/15/2000 BBB+ 1,004,590.00 3.03 1,000,000.00 MISTM INC BR NT 3.346 I.736 A3 100.152 1,003,830.D0 6.32 040420ATO 7.750% 06/15/2001 DO 07/07/94 A- 1,001,520.00 3.02 YLDAHAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07511102 2000/07/31 RUN DATE 00/04/00 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 14.02.18 PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,000,000.00 FLEST/NORSTAR FINL GROUP INC 3.365 9.688 A3 102.189 1,024,020.00 6.44 339018AD5 9.900% 06/15/2001 DO 06/24/91 A- 1,021,880.00 3.08 575,000.00 FCC NAIL BB DE NTH 4 TR 00284 7.426 6.402 AA2 99.578 570,262.00 3.61 30241NNV4 6.335% 03/15/2001 DO 03/14/96 AA- 572,573.50 1.33 420,000.00 BANKANERICA CORP SR NT 3.441 6.680 AA2 59.546 417,034.80 2.63 0660SOC32 6.650% 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/96 A+ 418,093.20 1.26 1,000,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN 6 JEN TR00011 7.530 6.162 A3 99.158 987,060.00 6.25 25766CAL0 6.110% 05/15/2001 OD 05/27/98 A- 991,580.00 2.99 -------- ------- --- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.820 5.516 15,841,210.36 100.00 15,845,393.45 47.81 _____ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 6.118 3.265 33,129,904.58 100.00 33,134,087.67 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 M SM7522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE t 08/04/00 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 14.02.18 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION EOM( YIELD S-P PRICE RAMET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ -----__--- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 150,337.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH SORT .000 6.327 AAA 100.000 150,337.47 .10 996085247 AAA 150,337.47 .04 10,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN NEED CORP DISC 6.460 .000 P-1 99.146 10,212,038.00 12.88 31339GD34 MAT O8/24/2000 A-1+ 10,3I2,038.DD 2.87 1,200,000.OD FEDERAL ROM LN MM CORD DISC 6.515 .000 P-1 98.696 1,194,353.67 1.49 313396J53 MAY 10-5-2000 A-l+ 1,184,353.67 .33 600,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP DISC 6.531 .000 P-1 96.446 590,476.50 .74 313396K44 NAY 10/12/2000 A-L+ 590,676.50 .12 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MID ASSN DISCOUNT 6.560 .000 P-1 99.435 689,323.06 .96 31358ON65 MAT 09/29/2000 A-I+ 669,323.06 .19 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HATL HIS ASSN DISC 6.568 .000 P-1 98.349 1,180,189.33 1.48 31358BL37 HAT 10/19/2000 A-1+ 1,100,109.33 .33 II,400,000.00 MOTOROLA CR CO DISC 6.591 .000 P-1 99.915 11,276,310.00 14.22 62007AJ64 09/08/2000 11,276,310.00 3.16 200,000.00 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 6.594 .000 P-1 98.833 197,754.22 .24 0301SAJ69 09/06/2000 197,754.22 .06 17,300,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTO CORP DISC 6.610 .000 P-1 98.570 17,052,648.50 21.51 313396FOI NAY 09/14/2000 A-l+ 17,052,648.50 4.7B 1,600,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PMR DISC 6.626 .000 HR 99.161 1,586,560.00 2.00 97665RHF2 08/15/2000 1,586,560.00 .45 6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.632 .000 P-1 98.458 6,104,400.06 3.70 36959HKC0 10/12/2000 6,104,408.06 1.71 7,400,000.00 DAINLERCHRYSLER DISC 6.640 .000 98.492 7,289,420.13 9.19 2338EOJ56 09/26/2000 7,268,420.33 2.04 5,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 6.665 .000 P-1 98.721 5,529,351.11 6.93 02225AJ60 09/06/2000 5,528,351.11 1.55 1,000,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AVER DISC 6.680 .000 P-1 90.358 983,515.00 1.24 02225AJL7 09/20/20D0 983,575.00 .28 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 5 MSF07522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE 08/04/00 DISTRICTI TANG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME t 14.02.18 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ___------_ 12,800,000.00 USM CAP CORE DISC 6.666 .000 P-1 98.266 12,579,080.00 15.86 9032SA033 09/IB/2000 12,578,080.00 3.53 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL MORE LN BR CONS DISC 3.430 .000 P-1 98.596 2,662,092.00 3.35 3133B4F39 MAY 09/13/2000 A-1+ 2,662,092.00 .75 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.546 .026 79,265,125.25 100.00 79,265,125.25 22.24 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 311,410.80 FHLNC GROUP 138-6064 .DOD 6.491 AM 98.359 303,820.17 .11 31346SNE3 6.384% 01/01/2020 DO 12/01/97 AM 306,300.55 .09 1,245,647.46 GNMA II POOL #0000395 .000 6.556 AM 99.141 1,234,358.77 .44 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 MA 1,234,947.35 .35 9,979,471.55 OHM II POOL 1080408X .000 6.556 MA 99.141 9,978,113.54 3.56 3622SCH28 6.500% 05/20/1030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 9,093,747.89 2.38 8,370,474.00 U6 TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.316 3.639 AM 99.525 9,741,054.19 3.15 9328233AS 3.625/ 07/15/2002 DO 09/IS/92 AAA 8,737,584.72 2.45 24,867,140.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.824 3.504 AM 96.312 24,020,316.16 9.64 9128272M3 3.3351 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AAA 23,950,039.88 6.72 1,060,503.60 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS INP 4.920 3.709 M3 98.412 1,034,603.01 .66 7154IBMI 3.650% 02/14/2OD2 DO 02/14/93 A 1,838,931.96 .52 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORE N A SR NT9 5.650 6.601 AA 90.433 1,543,215.00 .53 046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 03/11/97 A4 1,493,095.00 .41 3,950,000.00 GMAC MTS 5.352 6.031 A2 10G.445 3,918,)68.50 1.43 3304250V5 TIM AT 00/10/2003 ON 08/17/98 A 3,967,511.50 1.11 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HTS 5.760 5.869 A3 93.920 999,730.00 .35 42333HKJO 5.3501 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/98 A- 979,700.00 .27 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 000530 5.335 5.313 A2 100.540 999,168.90 .36 44181KET4 FLTG AT 06/01/2001 DD 09/04/90 A 1,005,40D.00 .28 2,005,000.00 HEMS ROEBUCK ACCEP COMP MTH 5.804 6.699 A3 97.625 2,060,739.00 .70 81140OGM6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,957,381.25 .55 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCBF07522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE t O8/04/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMB 1 14.02.10 .......................................................mm.mmemme.emm..me.mm.me...move=..........m..m........................ PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RAMAT VALUE 6 TOTAL 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.849 6.333 A3 98.406 3.093.190.00 1.06 812400JAl 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 2,552,180.00 .83 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY 5.091 6.339 Al 1DO.591 1,992,000.00 .72 066365DW4 PLTG AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A- 2,011,820.00 .54 279,281.95 FHLMC MULTICL MTN P/C 1534 E 5.912 5.930 99.500 270,095.10 .10 3I33702D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 203.891.41 .08 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY HLTH CARE HER B 5.942 5.532 AAA 85.868 1,630,474.05 .60 64579ENM0 4.050% 07/02/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,670,132.60 .43 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN MTN 5.981 5.838 AAA 99.016 14,955,300.00 5.35 31364G2V0 5.020% 07/19/2001 OD 07/19/99 AAA 14,852,400.00 4.13 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.955 6.439 AA3 99.012 2,525,725.00 .19 59018SKP4 6.335% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,475,300.00 .69 2,000,000.00 MOMI=HERY ALA BMC SER B 6.OD1 5.339 AAA 83.140 1,723,280.00 .62 61304IGH9 5.0001 11/15/2029 DO 12/01/98 AAA 1,742,000.00 .49 3.500t OOO.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.123 RA2 92.926 7.499.255.00 2.64 079867AXS 6.000% 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 AAA 0.344,450.00 2.01 2,490,390.89 STUDENT LN NEW ASSN 90-2 Al 6.026 6.520 AAA 99.446 2,405,040.44 .09 38442GRA3 FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 AAA 2,476,594.12 .69 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN MIX) CORP DEAN 6.062 6.049 AAA 91.190 12,405,625.00 4.43 3134A30MI 6.000% 07/20/2001 OD 03/20/99 AAA 12,398.750.00 3.48 2,000,000.00 HANKSOSTON CORP SR NTS 6.133 6.259 A2 93.063 1.999.600.00 .70 0660STALG 6.125% 03/15/2002 DO 03/12/99 A 1,953.260.00 .55 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN ITR00615 6.154 6.142 Al 100.031 3,498,635.00 1.26 17120QE80 FLTG AT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 A+ 3,501,085.00 .90 1.200,000.00 MADAN STANLEY MTN /TR 00311 6.180 6.496 AA 100.062 1,699,517.20 .61 61345ENY3 PLED AT O1/28/2002 OD O1/27100 AA- 1.301,054.00 .40 20.740.08 FIFTH THIRD HR AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.226 AAA 99.750 20,740.07 .00 31677EAA4 6.20D1 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 20,688.23 .01 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC MTN ITR OD004 6.202 6.251 A3 99.105 1,000,000.00 .35 73317PADI 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BBB+ 991,950.00 .28 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE , 3 OCSM0522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE , 08/04/00 DISTRICT2 LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.02.19 ............=...........................................................m................................................... PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY IS SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD 8-P PRICE MERRY VALUE 0 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _________- 2,336,097.25 FHLMC MULTTCMSS CM 2146 OT 6.203 6.160 AM 97.406 2,294,050.54 .82 3133TXKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AM 2,275,498.69 .64 2,000,000.00 FORD MM CR CO TERN ENHANCED 6.221 6.214 A2 99.933 1,990,613.60 .32 345393SC8 MIS RT 08/27/2004 DO 08/27/98 A 1,990,740.00 .56 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEM 6.231 6.139 Al 100.036 2,994,300.00 1.08 20P111CUS FLYG AT 06/1512002 DO 06/20/97 A+ 3,001,000.00 .84 290,1B5.26 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.322 AM 99.500 270,705.26 .09 3935052Y3 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 269,431.33 .08 4,500,000.00 FBDERAI. NATL MTN ASSN MTN 6.291 6.29B AM 90.922 4,488,705.00 1.60 31364CXVS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 AM 4,451,490.00 1.25 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MIN IM 00246 6.300 6.341 A3 99.359 3,000,000.00 I.03 42333HLP3 FLTG AT 04/20/2003 DD 04/27/99 A- 2,900,390.00 .04 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MIRE ACCEP IM 00562 6.303 6.238 A2 99.603 3,793,958.00 1.36 33042WEX0 FLIG RT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3,380,I06.00 I.06 2,092,158.18 FHLMC MULTICLA80 CTF E3 A 6.316 6.500 AM 95.630 2,895,321.22 .99 3133ME95 VAR RT O8/15/2032 AM 2,765,330.87 .76 2,514,373.63 GHMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 6.300 AAA 100.320 2,574,372.63 .93 3033H4HX9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,502,611.63 .32 2,000,000.00 BEM STEARNS C05 INC 6.330 6.096 A2 93.878 2,031,960.00 .30 073902ANI 6.250E 04/15/2003 A 1,953,560.00 .55 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 6.976 A2 99.835 3,000,000.00 1.08 345393SR5 MW RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,996,250.00 .84 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL HIS 6.351 6.865 A2 99.303 1,992,580.00 .TI 34539ORV3 MW AT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 1,994,060.00 .56 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CO MTN 6.440 6.422 A2 100.270 4,000,000.00 1.44 441eIMAS FLTO AT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 A 4,O11,120.00 1.13 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLABB CTF Tll A6 6.496 6.395 AM 15.663 2,000,888.00 .69 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AM 1,913,260.00 .54 2,000,000.00 MELLBR FINANCIAL INC NTS 6.503 9.028 A3 I00.062 2,000,000.00 .92 4233288KO FLTG AT 06/25/2001 DD 06/25/19 A- 2,001,240.00 .56 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 MSP07522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE , 00/04/00 DISTRICT. LONG-TBRH OPERATING RUN TINE 14.02.18 evvevvvevvmmvevvemvuvvv=vvvvnvvvvvvvv=vvvvvv=vvvv=vv=vvv==vv=vv=v=vvvvvvnuuunauvcucnnuevuvucnvnevunnevvvenvevevvvvvvvvvvvvvv PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 3 TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOM YIELD 9-P PRICE MEANT VALUE S TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,459,050.54 FNLMC MULTICLABB CTF BER 16202 6.515 3.344 AAA 81.700 2,302,918.60 .72 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 OD 11/01/93 ARA 2,009,050.83 .56 5,000,000.00 SALONON BB BLOCS MTN 6.625 6.633 AA3 99.805 5,000,000.00 1.00 7954SEBES FLTG AT 04/2Bt2003 DD 04/28/00 A 4,993,750.00 1.40 8,211,959.22 PHLMC GROUP IG5-0436 6.62E 2.050 AAA 99.294 8,340,271.07 2.94 312ODD055 3.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/9B AAA 8,153,982.79 2.29 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN ASIDE SLUGS MTN TR 00333 6.632 2.591 A3 301.15E 2,322,379.00 .93 52517PPW5 FLTG AT 04/01/2002 DO 03/29/99 A 2,326,634.00 .65 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 6.674 3.353 A3 99.953 5,000,000.00 1.80 52517PQ07 FLTO AT 12/12/2002 ON 22/07/99 A 4,997,650.00 1.40 1,026,251.03 ONMA 11 POOL /090098M 6.305 6.369 AAA 160.094 1,866,300.2E .65 36225CC20 VAR AT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AM 1,827,967.71 .51 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN MTG CORP DEBB 6.311 6.504 AAA 96.859 10,323,075.00 3.66 3134A3TCO 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/01/99 AAA 10,170,195.00 2.85 2,000,000.00 MASS 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.917 6.841 A2 96.038 1,992,280.00 .69 531748AB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,936,760.00 .54 3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.909 A2 96.930 2,995,090.00 1.04 3453978J3 6.300E 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 A4 2,909,100.00 .92 900,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN BE CONS BON 6.077 6.766 AAA 99.366 899,550.00 .32 3133MAO31 6.150E 02/01/2002 DD 02/01/00 AAA 893,894.00 .25 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNHA SF MTN 6.978 6.513 AAA 92.062 5,753,906.25 2.07 OIN060684 6.00% 8/15/2030 AAA 5,753,875.00 1.61 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE BONE IRA INC NT 6.866 0.084 A3 96.001 2,418,400.00 .90 22237UABO 6.850E 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,417,525.00 .68 14,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONNA SP MTO 6.950 6.056 94.813 13,027,056.69. 4.96 OIN0626BO 6.500% 08/15/2030 13,343,865.00 3.96 7,300,000.00 ONEOR INC NEW NT 6.960 7.391 A2 99.184 7,300,000.00 2.63 682680AJ2 FLTO RT 04/24/2002 DO 04/24/00 A 7,298,832.00 2.05 1,330,399.25 GUM 11 POOL #0080023 6.992 2.081 AAA 100.625 1,352,433.99 .48 36225CA09 0.125% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 1,338,714.25 .30 YLDANRL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 MSF07522202 2000/07/31 RUN DATE 1 08/04/00 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 1 14.02.18 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2.000.DU0.00 GNMA GTD RENIC TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 7.034 AAA 99.519 1,996,875.00 .71 3839H3C70 7.000% 12/20/2022 AAA 1,950,380.00 .51 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT 8K MTN SB 00001 7.084 7.107 A2 99.671 7,000,000.00 2.51 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A- 6,976,970.00 1.96 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTN ASSN DENS 7.113 6.862 AAA 96.547 2,030,133.00 .73 31359NBY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,027,487.00 .57 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DES 7.512 8.514 BAA3 96.314 2,151,250.00 .69 542671CT7 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 1,926,280.00 .54 1,312,607.01 GREYSTONB SVCNG CORP PEA 695-3 7.564 7.540 AAA 98.539 1,293,627.72 .46 398104AE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 1,293,627.72 .36 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO HT 7.582 7.DO3 A2 96.394 965,170.00 .34 3453970V9 6.750% 05/15/2005 A 993,940.00 .27 973,465.21 MHP/NUNTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 7.684 7.667 AAA 97.828 952,322.77 .34 30299BGR3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 952,322.77 .27 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN 4TR 00115 7.709 7.243 A2 100.793 2,950,530.00 1.09 69512EEU5 7.3DOB 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,023,190.00 .85 35,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTN ASSN MTN 7.724 6.957 AAA 93.437 32,498,400.00 11_86 31364GY.J2 6.5001 03/12/2009 DO 03/12/99 AAA 32,889,824.00 9.23 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM SP MTO 7.899 7.936 AAA 100.812 2,011,250.00 .72 OIND806B2 8.00% 06/15/2030 AAA 2,016,240.00 .51 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORD SR NT 7.967 7.809 Al 100.041 1,594,032.00 .58 020002AL5 7.075% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 Ai 1,613,456.00 .45 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.183 5.760 279,954,444.72 100.00 277,163,983.25 77.78 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 5.265 5.414 350,219,569.97 200.00 351,421,100.50 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSPCONSOLJDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN 31-Jul-2000 -22,000,000.00 NA9123459 ADMINISTRATOR 0.00 CW 31-Jul-2000 0.00 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 JUNE WIRE FEES 06-Jul-2000 -4.25 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Ju1-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 JUNE WIRE FEES 06-Jul-2000 -0.25 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Jul-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,995.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 -97.995.61 996085247 03-Jul-2000 87,995.61 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,995.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 -87,995.61 996085247 03-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 03-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20:50 En.ti.Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000 -31-JUL-2000 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,459.30 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Jul-2000 -7,459.30 996087094 03-Jul-2000 7,459.30 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 398,599.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 -398,599.29 996085247 03-Jul-2000 398,599.28 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 398,599.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 -399,599.28 996085247 03-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 955.09 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Jul-2000 -955.09 996087094 03-Jul-2000 955.09 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 14.525.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-1ul-2000 -14,525.59 996085247 05-1ul-2000 14,525.59 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 14,525.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Jul-2000 .14,525.59 996085247 05-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 05-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 05-Jul-2000 -886,429.50 2338EOJS6 09C26/20DO 05-Jul-2000 886,429,50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10.20:50 Executive JrorkbencJ, Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JUL-2000-31JUL-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 05-1ul-2000 -886,429.50 2338EWS6 0926/2000 05-1ul-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-1ul-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-1u1-2000 -689,323.06 31358BH65 MAT 09/28/2000 05-Jul-2000 689,323.06 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Jul-2000 -689,323.06 313588H65 MAT09128/2000 05-Jul-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 05-Ju1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,400,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 05-1ul-2000 -7,289,420.33 2338EO1S6 09/262000 05-Jul-2000 7,288,420.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 7,400,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DISC 05-Jul-2000 -7,288,420.33 2338EOJS6 09/262000 05-lul-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-1ul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Jul-2000 -197,400.00 3135881`91 MAT 09/15/2000 05-Jul-2000 197,400.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 05-1ul-2000 -197,754.22 03018A169 09/062000 06-Jul-2000 197,754.22 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10::20:50 aecwiv Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 AMERICAN TEL&TL DISC 05-Jul-2000 -197,754.22 03018AJ69 09/06/2000 06-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 06-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Jul-2000 -197,400.00 313588F91 MAT 09/15/2000 05-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,179,704.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Jul-2000 -10,179,704.97 996095247 06-Jul-2000 10,179,704.97 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,179,704.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Jul-2000 -10,179,704.97 996085247 06-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 06-1ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Jul-2000 -10,212,038.00 313396D34 MAT 0824/2000 07-Jul-2000 10,212,038.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Jul-2000 -10,212,039.00 313396D34 MAT 08/1A2000 07-Jul-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Jul-2000 -791,320.00 D7588RJ89 09A18/I= 10-Jul-2000 791,320.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:10:50 Fxe tfw Wwk6na•A Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: •5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY H) TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Jul-2000 -791,320.00 07588RJ89 09/08/2000 10-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000.00 NIKE INC DISC 07-lul-2000 490,560.50 6541D2J66 09/06/2000 10-Jul-2000 890,560.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,000.00 MOTOROLA CR CO DISC 07-Jul-2000 -11,276.310.00 62007AJ84 09/08R000 10-Jul-2000 11,276,310.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NIKE INC DISC 07-Jul-2000 -890,560.50 6541D2166 D9/06/2000 104ul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,000.00 MOTOROLA CR CO DISC 07-Jul-2000 -11,276,310.00 62007AI84 09/09/2000 10-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 123,690.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-1ul-2000 ,123,690.00 996085247 10-Jul-2000 123,690.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 123,690.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Jul-2000 -123,690.00 996085247 10-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 10-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-20W 10:20:50 Exeeuthv Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,056,076.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT II-Jul-2000 -1,056,076.40 996085247 11-Jul-2000 1,056,076.40 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,056,076.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Jul-2000 -1,056,076.40 996095247 11-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 11-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,868.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Jul-2000 -9,868.50 996085247 13-Jul-2000 9,868.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9,868.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Jul-2000 .9,868.50 996085247 13-Jui-2000 0.00 FC 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Jul-2000 -295,131.50 31359SK46 MAT 10/12/2000 13-Jul-2000 295,131.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Jul-2000 -295,131.50 313588K46 MAT IW12/2000 13-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,205.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jul-2000 45,205.50 996085247 17-Jul-2000 15,205.50 B 0.00 08-Aug-1000 /0:10:50 Exemliw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAG& -7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOIJDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,205.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jul-2000 -15.205.50 996085247 17-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 536,821.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jul-2000 -536,821.01 996085247 17Jul-2000 536,821.01 e 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 536,821.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Jul-2000 -536,921.01 996085247 17-Ju1.2000 0.00 FC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 17-Jul-2000 -984,794.50 38142TKJ3 10/18/2000 17-Jul-2000 984,794.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 17-Jul-2000 -884,7%.50 38142TK13 10/1=000 17-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Jul-2000 ,590,676.50 313396K44 MAT 10/12/2000 17.Jul-2000 590,676.50 B CHASE SECURITIES NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Jul-2000 -590,676.50 313396K44 MAT 10/1212000 17-Jul-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 17-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-1000 10:20:50 Exm,$,w Wmkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000lo000 01JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59,134.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Jul-2000 -59,134.62 996095247 18-1ul-2000 59,134.62 B 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 59,134.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Jul-2000 -59,134.62 996085247 18-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 18-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19Jul-2000 6,104,409.06 36959HKCO 10/122000 19-Jul-2000 6,104,409.06 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC - 19-Jul-2000 -6,104,408.06 36959HKCO 10f122000 19-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL CDR 19-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-Jul-2000 -1,180,189.33 31358SL37 MAT 10/19/2000 19-1ul-2000 1,190,189.33 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-Jul-2000 -1,180,189.33 313588L37 MAT 10/192000 19-Jul-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 567,598.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Jul-2000 -567,599.00 996085247 20-Jul-2000 567,599.00 B 0.00 08-Aug2000 I0:20.50 Ececurlve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: '9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 567,598.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Jul-2000 -567,598.00 996085247 20-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 24-Jul-2000 -1,184,353.67 313396/53 MAT 10-5-2000 24-Jul-2000 1,194,353.67 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Jul-2000 -1,184,353.67 313396/53 MAT 10-5.2000 24Jul-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 24-Ju1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 237,970.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Jul-2000 -237,970.05 996085247 25-Jul-2000 237,970.05 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 237,970.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Jul-2000 -237,970.05 996085247 25-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 25-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,764.73 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 25-Jul-2000 -6,764.73 996087094 25-1ul-2000 6,764.73 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,468.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Jul-2000 -34,468.73 996085247 26-Jul-2000 34,468.73 B 0.00 08-AW2000 10.20:50 Pxecuffm Wwkbemb Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,468.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 2rWul-2000 -34,468.73 996095247 26-3u1-2000 0.00 FC 26-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 26-Jul-2000 -3,799,316.00 717141GT7 07272000 26-Jul-2000 3,799,316.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 26-Jul-2000 -3,799,316.00 71714JGT7 07272000 26-JulQ000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 26-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GOLDMAN CAT REPO 27-Jul-2000 -4,000,000.00 99371UI22 06.440%07/312000 DO 07271 27-Jul-2000 4,000,000.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GOLDMAN CAT 4 REPO 27-Jul-2000 -4,000,000.00 99371UI22 06.440%07/312000 DO 0727/ 27-1ul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,162,695.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Jul-2000 4,162,695.57 996095247 28-Jul-2000 4,162,695.57 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,162,695.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Jul-2000 -4,162,695.57 996085247 28-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 28-Jul-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-Aug-2000 10 20�50 &Mdw WM*b&Wk Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, H PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01JUL-2000 -31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Jun-2000 -9,938,906.25 OIN062672 6.500%07/15/2030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-1ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Jun-2000 -5,742,187.50 OING60676 6.000%07/15/2030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Jun-2000 -10,412,197.50 OIN062672 6.500%07/15/2030 24-1ul-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Jun-2000 -2,016,250.00 OIN080674 8.000%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 275,000-00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 30-Jun-2000 -270,789.06 3133M6EA2 5.140%05/022001 DO 11/0219 03-Jul-2000 270,799.06 B CHASE SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 275,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 30-Jun-2000 -2,395.10 3133M6EA2 5.140-A 05/022001 DO 11/0219 03-Juld000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 275.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 30-Jun-2000 -273,184.16 3133M6EA2 5.140%05/022001 DD I I/02/9 03-Jul-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECS INC,NY 07-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-1000 10.20.50 Execunve Workbe h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01JUL-2000 -31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 8TR 00562 07-Jul-2000 -797,528.00 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/ 12-Jul-2000 797,528.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LI.C.NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 8TR 00562 07-Jul-2000 -8,867.56 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/141 12-Jul-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 8TR 00562 07-Jul-2000 -806,395.56 37042WZKO FLTG RT 021M003 DD 02/14/ 12-1ul-2000 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 12-1ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Jul-2000 .10,014,375.00 OIN062690 6.5005808/15/2030 23-Aug-2000 10,014,375.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Jul-2000 -10,487,812.50 OIN062680 6.500%08/15/2030 23-Aug-2000 10,497,812.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,00000 COMMITTOPURONMASFMTG 14-Jul-2000 -5,753,906.25 OIN060684 6.00%IV15/2030 23-Aug-2000 5,753,906.25 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMITTO FUR GNMA SF MTG 17-Jul-2000 .2,011,250.00 OIN080682 8.00%08/15/2030 23-Aug-2000 2,011,250.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 PAY UPS 08-Aug-2000 10:20:50 Executive W.,*b. o6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 1-3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCS'D-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,542.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -2,542.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 07/15/ 15-Im-2000 2,542.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,542.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -2,542.00 9128273A8 3.625%0 711 520 02 DO 07/15/ 15-Jan-2000 0.00 FC 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -6,900.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 154 2000 6,900.00 PU 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 6,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I5-J®-20M .6,900.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 011151 15-Jan-2000 0.00 FC 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,107.20 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -1.107.20 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2000 1,107.20 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,107.20 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -1,107.20 79549BBOI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Jul-2000 -23.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-1ul-2000 23.50 PU 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20:50 Fxeculive Workbench Q C ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 014UL-2000-31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 23.50 FHLMC MUL11CLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jul-2000 -23.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/15/2032 01Jul-2000 0.00 FC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,234.09 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-1ul-2000 -12,234.09 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 1110119 01-Jul-2000 - 12,234.09 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO- 12,234.09 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Jul-2000 -12,234.09 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 18-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,590.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -7,590.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jul-2000 7,590.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,590.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 -7,590.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 01/15/ 15-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,624,00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2000 .2.624.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-2000 2.624.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,624.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I5-Jul-2000 -2,624.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 31-JuI.2000 0.00 SALES 08-Aur2000 I0:20:50 Execmive ft kbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JUL-2000-314UL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CRP DISC 03-Jul-2000 197,437.22 313396A45 MATOSMI2D00 03-Jul-2000 -197,437.22 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,00D.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CRP DISC 03-Jul-2000 1,520.39 3133%A45 MATORMI2000 03-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CRP DISC 03-Jul-2000 198,957.61 313396A45 MAT OS/012000 03-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 03-Jul-2000 198,013.89 313588ZHI MAT 07/132000 03-Jul-2000 -198,013.89 S HSBC SECS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 03-Jul-2000 1,627.78 313588ZHI MAT 07/132D00 03-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 03-Jul-2000 199,641.67 313589ZHI MAT 07/132000 03-Jul-2000 0.00 PC HSBC SECS INC,NEWYORK 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -955.09 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 05-Jul-2000 9530 996087094 05-Jul-2000 .955.09 S 0.00 08-Au&2000 10.20:50 Pxecul[w Wwkkmh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,459.30 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 05-Jul-2000 7,459.30 996097094 05-Jul-2000 -7,45930 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -170,294.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Jul-2000 170,284.09 996095217 05-Jul-2000 -170,284.09 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -170,294.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Jul-2000 170,284.09 996085247 05-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 05-Jut-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -197,404.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Jul-2000 197,404.25 996085247 06-Jul-2000 -197,404.25 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -197,404.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Jul-2000 197,404.25 996085247 06-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 06-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 06-Jul-2000 10,352,580.00 313384F79 MAT 09/13/2000 06-Jul-2000 -10,352,580.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 064u1-2000 18,217.50 313384F79 MAT 09/13/2000 06-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20,50 Executive Workbench Q 17 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocscooma000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAM/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 06-Jul-2000 10,370,797.50 313384F79 MAT 09/13/2000 06Jul-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,212,038.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Jul-2000 10,212,038.00 996085247 07-Jul-2000 -10,212,038.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,212,038.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Jul-2000 10,212,038.00 996085247 07-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 07-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,355,064.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10Jul-2000 355,064.66 996085247 104ul-2000 355,064.66 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,355,064.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Jul-2000 355,064.66 996085247 10-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 10-1ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -806,395.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Jul-2000 806,395.56 996085247 12-Ju1-2000 -806,395.56 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -806,395.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Jul-2000 806,395.56 996085247 12-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 12-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20.50 Ewcudw Warkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc00010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,649,097.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT' 19-Jul-2000 648,097.39 996095247 19-Jul-2000 -648,097.39 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,648,097.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Jul-2000 649,097.39 996085247 19-Juld000 0.00 FC 19-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO• -1,019,894.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jul-2000 1,018,894.68 996085247 24-Jul-2000 -1,018,8%.68 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,018,894.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Jul-2000 1,018,894.68 996085247 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,764.73 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 26-Jul-2000 6,764.73 996087094 26-Jul-2000 -6,764.73 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Jul-2000 200,000.75 996085247 27-Jul-2000 -200,000.75 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Jul-2000 200,000.75 996085247 27-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 27-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aur2000 10:20.50 Evmti sWorkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: ro PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 014UL-2000-31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000.000.00 GOLDMAN CAT 4 REPO 27-Jul-2000 4,000,000.00 99371UI22 06.440%07/312000 DO 0727/ 31-Jul-2000 -4,000,000.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 GOLDMAN CAT 4 REPO 27-Jul-2000 2,862.22 99371UI22 06.440%07/312000 DO 0727/ 31-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GOLDMAN CAT 4 REPO 27-1ul-2000 4,002,962.22 99371UI22 06.440%07/31/200D DO 0727/ 31-Jul-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -138.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jul-2000 138.11 996095247 31-Jul-2000 -139.11 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -138.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jul-2000 138.11 996095247 31-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 31-Ju14000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,250,033.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jul-2000 4,250,033.15 996085247 31-Jul-2000 4,250,033.15 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4.250,033.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Jul-2000 4,250,033.15 996095247 31-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 31-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-1000 10:10:J0 aec.1m Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JUL-2000 -31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 31-1u1-2000 3,966,420.00 97665RHF2 08/15/2000 31-1ul-2000 -3,966,420.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 31-Jul-2000 22,613.33 97665RHF2 08/15/2000 31-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 31-1ul-2000 3,989,033.33 97665RHF2 08/152000 31-1ul-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 31-1ul-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,017,540.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Jul-2000 1,034,924.53 9128275W8 4.250Yo001/152010 DO 01/151 11-Jul-2000 -1,010,460.00 S GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC.GREE 24,464.53 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,017,540.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Jul-2000 21,151.87 9128275W8 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 1I-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,017,540.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 104ul-2000 1,056,076.40 9128275W8 4.250%n001/152010 DO 011151 11-Jul-2000 0.00 PC GREENWICH CAP MKTS INC,GREE II-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Jul-2000 10,016,835.94 OIN062672 6.500%07/15/2030 244u1-2000 -9,938,906.25 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 77,929.69 08-Aug-2000 10.20:30 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE DI PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 014UL-2000 -31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Jul-2000 10,016,835.94 OIN062672 6.500%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,00000 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Jul-2000 10,490,390.63 OING62672 6.500%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 -10,412,197.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 79,203.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO• -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Jul-2000 10,490,390.63 OIN062672 6.5005507/15/2030 24-1ul-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 14.Jul.2000 5,754,638.67 OINO60676 6.000%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 -5,742,187.50 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12,451.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SFMTG 14-Jul-2000 5,754,638.67 OIN060676 6.000%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 17-Jul-2000 2,013,125.00 OINOB0674 8.000%07/152030 24-Jul-2000 -2,OIC250.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -3,125.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 17-Jul-2000 2,013,125.00 OIN080674 8.000%071152030 24-Jul-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 24-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10::20:50 Ereculie Wmkbeuh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 GMAC MTN FLTG RT 28-Jul-2000 3,012,498.00 37042WVR9 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 31-Jul-2000 -1,010,830.00 S PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 1,669.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 GMAC MTN FLTG RT 28-Jul-2000 25,033.73 37042WVR9 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 31-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,000,000.00 GMAC MTN FLTG RT 28-Jul-2000 3,037,531.75 37042WVR9 12/17/20DI DO 12/15/98 31-Jul-2000 0.00 FC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 8TR 00299 28-1ul-2000 4,001,600.00 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 041151 31-Jul-2000 -3,997,788.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 3,812.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO .4,000.000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 8TR 00299 28-Ju1.2000 10,708.06 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 041151 31-Ju1.2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MT 4 8TR 00299 28-Jul-2000 4,012,308.06 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 0015/ 31-1ul-3000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 28Jul-2000 6,526,590.00 31364GY12 6.500%03/12/2009 DO 03/1219 31-Jul-2000 .6,462,750.00 S MORGAN J P SECS-FIXED[NCO 63,840.00 08-Avg-2000 10:20:50 &ecu/he Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 014UL-2000-31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 28-Jul-2000 175.680.56 31364GYJ2 6.500%03/122009 DO 03/12/9 31-Jul-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 28-Jul-2000 6,702,270.56 31364GY12 6.500%03/12/2009 DD 03/1219 31-Jul-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED[NCO 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Jul-2000 6,627,031.25 OING62680 6.500%08/152030 23-Aug-2000 -6,675,130.81 S FIRST UNION CAP MKTS,NEW YO 48,099.56 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1000.40 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Jun-2000 11,300.40 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2029 DD 12/01/ 01-Jun-2000 0.00 FC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,475.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jun-2000 45,475.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-Jun-2000 43,525.24 PDC 49.74 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -574.57 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 01-Jun-2000 574.57 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Jun-2000 0.00 FC 06-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20:30 &ecutiw Wmkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,499.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jun-2000 45,499.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT OS/152032 01-Jun-2000 -45,548.76 PD -49.76 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,499.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jun-2000 45,499.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/132032 01-Jun-2000 0.00 FC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,322.15 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Jul-2000 50,322.15 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Jul-2000 -50,251.38 PD 70.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,322.15 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Jul-2000 50,322.15 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,428.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Jul-2000 36,428.75 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Jul-2000 -35,785.56 PD 643.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,428.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Jul-2D00 36,428.75 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -71,861.90 FHLMC GROUP#03.0476 01-Jul-2000 71,961.90 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Jul-2000 -72,994.74 PD -1,122.84 08-Aug1000 10:20:50 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDA TED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -71,86L90 FHLMC GROUP#05.0476 01-Jul-2000 71,861.90 3128DDQ55 7.000%021012003 DD 021011 01-Jul-2000 0.00 rc 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34.206.60 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Jul-2000 34,206.60 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Jul-2000 -34,773.15 PD -566.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO. -34,206.60 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Jul-2000 34,206.60 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,692-50 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Jul-2000 35,692.50 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 0610119 01-Jul-2000 -36,463.05 PD -790.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,682.50 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Jul-2000 35,68Z50 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DD 06101/9 01-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,990.58 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Jul-2000 2,990.58 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Ju13000 -2,963.49 PD 27.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,990.58 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Jul-2000 2,990.58 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/0V 01-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 20-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20:50 Exwwm Warkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000 -31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,703.77 GNMA II POOL N080408X 01-Jul-2000 10,703.77 36225CN28 6.500%0 5/2012 03 0 DO 051011 01Jul-2000 -10,595.06 PD 109.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,703.77 GNMA 11 POOL N080408X 01-1ul-2000 10,703.77 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DD 05/01/ 01-1ul-2000 0.00 PC 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,723.00 FHLMC GROUP N78-6064 01-Jul-2000 5,723.00 31348SWZ3 6.394%01/012028 DD 12/011 01-Jul-2000 -5,583.50 PD 139.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -44,936.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Jul-2000 44,936.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-Jul-2000 -44,985.14 PD -49.14 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,259.18 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 01-1ul-2000 1,259.19 39810NAE4 7A30%06/012003 DD 0229/0 01-Jul-2000 -1.240.78 PD 18.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,259.19 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 01-Jul-2000 1,259.19 39810NAE4 7.4304506/012003 DO 02/29/0 01-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 25-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -578.58 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE NOD0611150 01-Jul-2000 578.39 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021N OIJul-2000 -566.01 PD 12.57 08-Aug-2000 10:20.50 Exemllve Wwkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.- 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01JUL-2000-314UL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -578.58 WMPMUNTOON PAIGE N000-11150 01-Jul-2000 578.58 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DD 102119 01-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 31-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,516.15 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A4 15-Jul-2000 33,516.15 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 08/26/9 154u1.2000 -33,516.15 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,516.15 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Jul-2000 33,51615 3935052Y7 6.290%10/I52013 DO 0826/9 15-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,009.79 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Jul-2000 5.009.79 31677EAA4 6.200%091012001 DO 0311519 15-Jul-2000 -5,009.79 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,009.79 FIFTH THIRD BK.AUTO TR 96A C 15-Jul-2000 5,009.79 31677EAA4 6200%09/012001 DO 03/15M 15-Ju1-2000 0.00 PC 27-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,536.27 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Jul-2000 43,536.27 3837H4NX9 VARRT02JI62030 16-Jul-2000 -43,536.27 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,536.27 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 PH 16-Jul-2000 43,536.27 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jul-2000 0.00 PC 17-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10.20,50 Fff"Utiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -182,837.76 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98.2 Al 25-Jul-2000 182.837.76 78442GBA3 FLTO RT 04125/2007 DO 06/181 25-Jul-2000 ,182,444.94 PD 39192 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -182,937.76 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 A I 25-Ju14000 182,837.76 784420BA3 FLTG RT 04/252007 DO 06118/ 25-Jul-2000 0.00 FC 25-Jul-2000 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Jul-2000 7,733,299.17 36939HG50 07Po52000 05-1ul-2000 -7,733,299.17 MT 05-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 05-Jul-2000 886,670.00 63743CG56 07/052000 05-Jul-2000 -886,670.00 MT 05-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 10-Jul-2000 1,090,163.25 07588RGA7 07/102000 10-Jul-2000 -1,090,163.25 MT 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 10-Jul-2000 11,329,909.00 34110AGA5 07/102000 10-Jul-2000 -11,329,909.00 MT 10-1ul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 /0:10:50 Execwive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -50Q000.00 HEINZ H J CO DISC 10-Jul-2000 495,549.17 42307JGA2 07/102000 10-1ul-2000 495,549.17 MT 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,305,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 13-Jul-2000 301,971.18 313588ZHI MAT 07/132000 13-Juld000 -301,971.19 MT 13-1ul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 17-Ju1.2000 891,103.50 38142TGH2 O7172000 17-Jul-2000 -891,103.50 MT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,200,000.00 HEINZ H J CO DISC 19-Jul-2000 6,139,051.67 42307JGKO 07/192000 19-Jul-2000 -6,138,051.67 MT 19-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 26-Jul-2000 3,671,855.33 71714JGS9 07262000 26-Jul-2000 .3,671,835.33 MT 26-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 27-Jul-2000 3,799,316.00 71714JO 1*7 07/272000 27-Jul-2000 -3,799,316.00 MT 27-Jul-2000 0.00 INTEREST 08.Au8.1000 10:20:50 Executive Wwkbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 OI-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,945,000.00 NEW JERSEY HLTH CARE SER B 03-Jul-2000 46,193.75 64579ERMO 4.750%07/01/2028 DO 12/0I/9 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS FLOGS MTN TR 003 03-Jul-2000 41,801.86 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/01/2002 DO 0329/ 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 7,459.30 996083247 01-1u1-2000 0.00 IT 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Jul-2000 955.09 996085247 01-Ju14000 0.00 IT 03-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 05-Jul-2000 66,700.83 36959HO50 07/052000 05-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 05-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 05-Jul-2000 13,330.00 63743CG56 07/052000 05-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 05-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG 574.57 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE%000-11150 06-Jul-2000 6,091.37 302998GE3 7.500%1 210 112 03 0 DO 1021/9 01-Jun-2000 0.00 IT 06-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10:20:50 EtecuHue Workbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE`. 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-JUL-2000-31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 10-Jul-2000 70,091.00 34110AGA5 071102OW 10-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 10-Jul-20DO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 104ul-2000 9,936.75 07588RGA7 07/102000 10-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 10-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 HEINZ H J CO DISC 10-lu1.2000 4,450.83 42307JGA2 07/10/2000 10-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 10-Jul-2000 O.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 305,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 13-Jul-2000 3.028.82 313588ZHI MAT 07113200D 13-1ul-2000 0.00 IT 13-Jul.2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 13-Jul-2000 6,900.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/15/ 0.00 CD 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 13-1ul-2000 2,542.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 0.00 CD 13-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 17-Jul-2000 100,500.00 345397S13 6.700%07/162O04 DO 07/16/9 16-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-2000 10.20:50 E.ec.&i Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 17-lu1.2000 48,750.00 046003HY8 6.500%07/152002 DD 07/11/9 15-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,959,550.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 17-Juld000 419,504.91 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/IS/ 15-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,767,850.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 17-Jul-2000 158,917.29 9128273AS 3.625%07/132002 DO 07/151 15-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN BTR 00299 17-Jul-2000 65,027.08 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/152D02 DO 04/151 15-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 17-Ju14000 8,896.50 38142TGH2 O7172000 17-Jul-2000 0.00 1T 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,861.90 FHLMC GROUP NOS-0476 17-Jul-2000 48,322.29 3128DDQSS 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 36,428.75 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 17-Jul-2000 11,862.63 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/1512011 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Ag2000 10:20:50 Ex the Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-JUL-2000- 31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLJDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,322.15 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 17-Jul-2000 1,620.58 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Jul-2000 "o FF 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,300.40 FHLMC GROUP N78-6064 17-Jul-2000 1,737.96 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Jun-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jui-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 17-1ul-2000 23.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Jum2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-20D0 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,499.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 17-Jul-2000 15,587.77 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 014uro2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,516.15 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 17-Jul-2000 1,595-05 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 082619 154ul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,536.27 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 PH 17-Jul-2000 15.598.39 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 17-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,234.09 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 18-Jul-2000 12,234.09 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 18-Jul-2000 0.00 08-A,0^1000 10,20.50 Ere li eWo kbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01JUL-2000-314UL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 19-Jul-2000 436,500.00 3136402V0 5.820%07/192001 DD 07/199 19-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 19-JuI-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,200,000.00 14EINZ H J CO DISC 19-Jul-2000 61,948.33 42307JGKO 07/192000 19-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 19-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 20-Jul-2000 373,000.00 3134A3ZMI 6.000%07202001 DO 07209 20-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN NTRO06 20-Jul-2000 18,477.10 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 20-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 20-Jul-2000 11,666.67 3837H3C70 7.0D04' 12202022 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20-lul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,206.60 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 20-Jul-20M 8,102.35 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,682.50 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 20-Jul-2000 9,891.52 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/0119 01-Jul-20D0 0.00 IT 20-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug2000 10,20:50 Eiecu/rve WnkWwh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 95 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01JUL-2000 -31JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,990.58 GNMA 11 POOL 00090395 20-1ul-2000 6,763.46 36225CNM4 6.500%04202030 DO 04/011 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,703.77 GNMA II POOL 8080408X 20-Jul-2000 34,113.45 36225CN28 6.50D%05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 20Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOKINCNEWNT 24-Jul-2000 127,020,00 69268OAl2 FLTG RT 04/2420D2 DD 042M 24-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 24-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,00D.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Jul-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 23-Jun-2000 0.00 IT 25-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 182,837.76 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98.2 AI 25-Jul-2000 44,298.99 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 25-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 25-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,259.19 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 995 25-Jul-2000 5,505.53 398109AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 01-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 25-Jul-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 26-Jul-2000 28,144.67 717141GS9 07262000 26-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 26-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Au8.2000 /0:20:50 Exeeudw Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-JUL-2000 -314UL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 PHARMACIA CORP DISC 27-Jul-2000 684.00 717141GT7 07/27/2000 27-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 27-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5.009.79 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 27-Jul-2000 133.04 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/15/9 15-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 27-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 8TR 00246 28-Jul-2000 50,315A2 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 04282003 DO 0427/ 28-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 28-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 28-Jul-2000 83,732.64 7954SEEES FLTG RT 04282003 DO 04291 28-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 28-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 8TR 00311 28-Jul-2000 27,931.95 61745ENY3 FLTG RT 01282002 DD 0127/ 28-Jul-2000 0.00 IT 28-Jul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 31-1u1-2000 1,107.20 79549BBGI 3.6501A 02/142002 DO 02/14/ 0.00 CD 31-1u1-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 31-Jul-2000 10.14 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-Jul-2000 0.00 CD 31-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug2000 10:20.50 Ezeeut/ve Workbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01JUL-2000-31-JUL-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LABS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM PUS INT ADJ 31-1ul-2000 -138.11 990000PA NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-Jul-2000 0.00 CW 31-Jul.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 578.59 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE 800A 11150 314ul-2000 6.087.77 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 102119 014ul-2000 0.00 IT 314ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 314ul-2000 7,590.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/151 0.00 CD 344ul-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 314ul-2000 2,624.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 071151 0.00 CD 31-Jul-2000 0.00 08-Aug-1000 10.20.30 Emmim Wor#bem6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS To ed.mar. os2arzsss AGENDA REPORT Ie Number I nemr r Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. 2000/01R0l REBID GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve additional funds of$133,000 for caustic soda chemical used for disinfecting and odor abatement, 2) receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, 3) award a contract to GW International (Western States) for the purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. 2000/01-01 R01 Rebid, for an estimated annual amount not to exceed $470,300. SUMMARY Caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) is used in the foul air scrubbers and in the District's main trunklines tributaries to Treatment Plant No. 1 and No. 2. It is estimated that the District will use a cumulative total 1,775 dry tons of caustic soda during the FY 2000-01. Approximately 1,200 dry tons of the chemicals are projected to be consumed in the trunklines. During the Board of Directors' meeting on June 28, 2000, the District's board approved funding in an amount not to exceed $337,300 for caustic soda consumption for the FY 2000-01, as shown on Section 5, page 12, of the Approved Budget Book. This amount was based on $190.00 per dry ton. Because of the volatility of the commodities market, the current price for caustic soda is $265.00 per dry ton, thus an increase of$133,000 to the budgeted amount. Therefore, the new total cost for caustic soda is not to exceed $470,300. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The General Manager is seeking Board approval to award the Caustic Soda Solution Specification No. 2000/01-01R01 Rebid contract to GW International (Western States) for an estimated amount not to exceed $470,300. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 000.�ww n.w.a. a�oree Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION During the competitive bid process, it was discovered that the estimated annual usage , indicated in the specification was inaccurate. The specification indicated the annual usage at 3,000 dry tons. The usage should have been based upon an annual usage amount of 1,775 dry tons. Due to the dramatic differences in consumption amounts, the original bid was cancelled, and a re-bid was conducted to ensure a fair and ethical procurement process. ALTERNATIVES The District could opt to not provide additional funding for the caustic soda chemical. However, staff is recommending the Board's approval, because the application of caustic soda chemical to reduce odors in the sewer trunklines and provide disinfecting at the treatment plant has been used effectively. Generally speaking without caustic soda application in the sewer trunklines and at the treatment plants the District would receive additional odor complaints and the costs for odor control at the treatment plants would increase. CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Bid Tabulation R11111d Page 2 BID PRICE TABULATION PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. 2000101-01 R01 REBID Bid Opening: August 8, 2000 REBID TAB Bidder Total Delivered Price Notes per dry ton 1. Sierra Chemical NO BID 2. Hills Bros NO BID 3. Eaglebrook NO RESPONSE 4. Pioneer Chemical • See#9 below $297.27 5. Commerce Chemical $311.40 6. Basic Chemical (Pressure Vessel) $317.86 7. GW International (Western States) $264.95 8. Jones Chemical NO RESPONSE 9. All Pure Chemicat/PIONEER 'See 94 above $297.27 10. Holchem NO BID 11. FMC Corp NO RESPONSE 12. Ashland Specialty Chemicals NO RESPONSE 13. CIBA NO RESPONSE 14. Kemwater North America Found non-responsive 15. US Filter NO RESPONSE We have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. We,therefore, recommend award to GW International in the bid amount of 2 4.95 as the lowest and best bid. Marc Dubois, C.P.M. / Contracts/Purchasing Manager 215/ © v Dat— e H'%w .dlal nQ301Blds&Contrads12000-01 Non-board bids@000-0"l R01 REBID\BID PRICE TABULATION 2.dn0 t Y MINUTES OF SPECIAL JOINT MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT July 15, 2000, 8:00 a.m. President Pickier called to order the July 15, 2000 special joint meeting of the Orange County Water District Board of Directors with the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors at 8:00 a.m. in the Boardroom at the District office and President Pickier led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Directors and staff present were: Directors Staff Philip L. Anthony (absent) William R. Mills Jr., General Manager Wes Bannister (absent) Thomas Dawes, GWR System Project Manager Kathryn L. Barr Jill Everhart, Recording Secretary Jan M. Flory Debra Burris, Shivaji Deshmukh, John V. Fonley Jennifer DeNoyer, Bill Dunivin, Jerry A. King John Kennedy, Mehul Patel, Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Ron Wildermuth, Nira Yamachika Thomas E. Lutz Iry Pickier Kelly E. Rowe OCSD Directors OCSD Staff Steve Anderson Blake Anderson, General Manager Don Bankhead Jim Herberg, Bob Ooten, Gary Streed, Guy Carrozo Moy Yahya Lynn Daucher Jan Debay Art DeBolt Norm Eckenrode Dave Garofalo Peter Green Mark Leyes Pat McGuigan Joy Neugebauer Russ Patterson Anna Piercy Others present included. Jerry Gewe, Bill Van Wagoner - Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Gary Yamamoto - Department of Health Services, Los Angeles Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille, Kellene Bum-Lucht, Suzanne Rowe, Don Schroeder - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Rick Davis, Stephanie Lopez, NCG-Porter Novelli Dr. Greg Leslie - CH2M Hill, Australia a Ed Royce -Municipal Water District of Southern California Tom and Marge England - League of Women Voters John Hills - City of Anaheim Larry Dick- Serrano Water District Erna Foronia - Orange County Flood Control District Bill Everest - Boyle Engineering Steven Agior, Michelle Farmer, Mike Hoover - ASL Don Schulz- Surfrider Foundation Kimo Look- Project Partners Brett Barbre- Yorba Linda Water District Ron Young - Malcolm Pimie Jason Choi, Charles Kim - U.S. Dyeing &Finishing Bob Finn, Jeff Heden - Brown and Caldwell Lisa Lawson, Patrick Scanlon - Southern California Water Company Duane R. Jordan - The Boeing Co. Bill Ault- City of Fountain Valley Duane Jordan, City of Buena Park Jim Fournier- Orange County Board of Supervisors Mary McDaniel - McDaniel Lambert Earle Hartling - Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Groundwater Replenishment System Workshop No. 2 President Iry Pickler welcomed the Directors, staff and others to the second Joint Board Workshop for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System. He congratulated OCSD Directors Eckenrode and Green for their respective appointments as OCSD Chair and Vice Chair. OCSD Chair Eckenrode then welcomed everyone to the meeting. General Manager William R. Mills Jr. gave an overview of water reclamation. He introduced Gerald Gewe, Assistant General Manager Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, who provided an overview of the San Fernando Valley Water Reclamation Project. Kellene Bum-Lucht of Camp Dresser & McKee then led a panel discussion on the San Fernando Valley experience. Panelists included: Bill Van Wagoner, P.E.; Project Manager East Valley Water Recycling Project, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Earle Hartling, Water Recycling Coordinator, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts; Gary Yamamoto, Chief of Technical Services, Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles; and Dr. Mary McDaniel, D.O., J.P., MPH, McDaniel Lambert, Inc. A lengthy question and answer period followed the panel discussion. In conclusion, Project Manager Tom Dawes provided a project overview. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Boards, the meeting adjourned at 10:50 a.m. It was noted that the third Joint Board GWR System Workshop would be held on October 7, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. at OCSD. Jill Everhart, Recording Secretary Iry Pickler, President 9 , ? I MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT July 17, 2000, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on July 17, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip L. Anthony Jan Debay Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue Jerry King, Altennate No. 1 Russell Patterson, Alternate No. 2 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Blake Anderson Director W. Bannister Dick Comeille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. Jim Herberg Director Kelly Rowe Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. Bob Ooten Debra Burris Don Schroeder, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. Wendy Sevenandt Andy Czomy Rick Davis, NCG Porter Novelli Tom Woodruff Thomas M. Dawes Mary McDaniel, McDaniel Lambert Jennifer DeNoyer Michelle Tuchman, NCG Porter Novelli Shivaji Deshmukh Bob Finn, Brown and Caldwell Jill Everhart Bill Everest, Boyle Engineering Cindy Gehman Bill Hange, MWDOC Jenny Glasser David Wieland, Wieland &Associates, Inc. Clark Ide Eric Petersen, Hawkins, Delafield &Wood, NY John Kennedy Mehul Patel Ron Wildennuth 1. Approval of Minutes Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held June 19, 2000 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Presentation on Design-Build Issues Mr. Dawes introduced Mr. Eric Petersen of Hawkins, Delafield & Wood who gave an overview of alternative delivery methods of design-build, design-build-operate, and design-build-finance-operate. a } Minutes July 17,2000 Page 2 of 3 3. Financial Studv Mr. Dawes reported that four proposals had been submitted for the financial study. He reported that staff from both agencies has reviewed the proposals. A special meeting was suggested and scheduled for Monday, July 31, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. to give the Committee time to review the proposals before a decision is reached. 4. Report on Development Information Memoranda 1 (Influent Pump Station): 8 (Product and Barrier Pump Stations): Part of DIM 24 (Construction Sequence)' and Environmental Noise Studv Mr. Dawes stated that Mr. Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. would have his staff report on the development information memoranda (DIM). Mr. Corneille introduced Mr. David Wieland, Wieland Associates, Inc., who gave an overview of the environmental noise study. Several preliminary recommendations were made to the Committee. The Committee was in concurrence with these findings. Mr. Bob Finn, Brown and Caldwell, gave an overview of the influent pump stations, DIM 1, and product water and barrier pump stations (DIM 8). The Committee concurred with these findings. Mr. Don Schroeder, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. gave a presentation on the interim barrier operations. Mr. Blake Anderson raised concerns that interruption of service to Water Factory 21 and added costs should be more closely studied, and that perhaps a site relocation to the south would solve the problem. It was decided to relook at the site issue, especially in relation to interim maintenance of Water Factory 21, and report back later to the Committee. 5. Project Implementation Mr. Dawes reported that many decisions will be required from the Committee over the next few months so that project implementation recommendations can be presented to both Boards of Directors. This item was an introduction of the issues that will follow. 6. Public Information Report Mr. Wildermuth gave a report on the status of the public information program. Staff presented options to expand the public information program. Additional information will follow. Minutes July 17, 2000 Page 3 of 3 7. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following items: a. The briefing for Assemblyman Lou Correa scheduled for July 18 has been canceled. His office will call to reschedule. b. A handout of a presentation of a water education workshop for the Department of Water and Power, City of Los Angeles was passed out. c. Within a couple of weeks the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be reached. d. Most of the more technical DIMS should be completed by the end of July 2000. e. Mr. Gerald Jones an OCSD retiree has been hired through OCSD as an automation expert consultant. The cost sharing will be $15,000 to each agency. ADJOURNMENT A special Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for July 31, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. at the Orange County Sanitation District Administrative Offices, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. I MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT July 31, 2000, 8:00 a.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCSD offices at 8:00 a.m. on July 31, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: OCWD Directors OCSD Directors Iry Pickler, Chair Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip L. Anthony Brian Donahue Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Jan Debay Jerry King, Alternate No. 1 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 2 Russell Patterson, Alternate No. 2 Shawn Boyd, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Blake Anderson Director Wes Bannister Rick Davis, NCG Porter Novelli Jim Herberg William R. Mills Jr. Michelle Tuchman, NCG Porter Novelli Lisa Lawson Debra Burris Gary Slreed Thomas M. Dawes Wendy Sevenandt Jennifer Denoyer Shivaji Deshmukh Jill Everhart Clark Ida Mehul Patel 1. Approval of Minutes Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Debay and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held July 17, 2000 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Financial Study Mr. Dawes introduced Wendy Sevenandt who gave an overview of the financial study. Seven proposals were requested and four proposals were submitted. Ms. Sevenandt described the rating process and the staff recommendation. She noted that the scope of work specifies that the chosen proposer will make a monthly update to the Committee. The staff rating team recommended that the Committee select the Public Resources Advisory Group at a cost not to exceed $85,000 to complete the financial study. Minutes July 31, 2000 Page 2 of 2 Upon motion by Director Debay, seconded by Director Donahue and carried, the Committee authorized issuance of a task order in an amount not to exceed $85,000 to Public Resources Advisory Group to do the financial study. 3. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following items: a. Federal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Fish and Wildlife Services have sent us their comments on our responses. A Record of Decision will soon follow. b. A project schedule from Camp Dresser McKee Inc. was handed out. General Manager Mills reported that he is continuing to lobby to increase the federal authorization from $20 million to $80 million for the GWR System. During the August recess he will try to meet with legislative members and discuss the GWR System and how it will support CALFED objectives. General Manager Anderson discussed the replacement of the Santa Ana Interceptor within the Santa Ana Canyon where it was placed in the riverbed in the 1970's. While OCSD owns the line in Orange County, SAWPA owns about 75% of the capacity, and would therefore have to pay about $30 million of the estimated $40 million cost to relocate the line. The line is in jeopardy from the continuing erosion of the bed of the Santa Ana River. Director Eckenrode said that he will be meeting with the Hispanic Congressional Delegation on August 18 and will solicit their support for the GWR System. He also noted that the City of Anaheim has requested that landscaping be provided adjacent to the OCWD's percolation basins near the Santa Ana River. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for August 21, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Me ngDate o8d.ofDir. AGENDA REPORT 1f41t ftO Jim INu) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Stephen Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: RESTRUCTURING OF THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION—ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2000 CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION — ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. FC 0-1, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to the Execution and Delivery of Orange County Sanitation District Refunding Certificates of Participation, Series 2000, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of such Certificates Evidencing Principal in an Aggregate Amount of not to exceed $230,000,000, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions, and Authorizing the Execution and Delivery by the Corporation of Amendments to Specified Agreements, Documents and Instruments with respect to County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary Documents and Certificates and Related Actions. SUMMARY Staff has been implementing a Board-approved plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates of Participation (COP) long-term borrowings, which includes issuance of the new Series 2000 COPS, and substitution of modernized and simplified bond documents for the Series 1992 and Series 1993 COPs. In April, the District Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. OCSD 00-06, which authorized formation of the Orange County Financing Corporation. The not-for-profit corporation, created for the sole purpose of facilitating current and future COP financings, is required in order for the District to issue the Series 2000 COPS. meamua Ir .euao�da�a n 8Re�eQee]a ran da RepvlSWM%lem raaoc RMW:Wme Page 1 In July, the District Board adopted Resolution No. OCSD 00-17,the Resolution Authorizing Issuance of the Series 2000 Refunding and Reimbursement COPS, not to exceed $230 million. The financing schedule calls for pricing and sale of the COPS on August 30, followed by settlement of the transaction, and delivery of proceeds to the District on August 31. This agenda item presents a companion Resolution Authorizing Issuance of the Series 2000 COPS, for adoption by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation. Adoption of Resolution No. FC-01 is a necessary step in the final preparations for completing the issuance of the Series 2000 Refunding and Reimbursement COPS on August 31. Your attention is directed to the recitals in the Resolution (page 1-5)which provide an explanation of the otherwise complex aspects of the transactions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The COP refinancing is expected to reduce the overall cost of borrowing over the life of the issue. The present value savings resulting from elimination of credit enhancement and lower cost liquidity, is estimated at$1.4 million. These cashflow savings will cover all costs related to the refunding of and amendments to the prior COPS, and will generate positive net present value savings relative to the refunded COPS. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. FC-01 14aEpnVatallrq.E1.9 dMZOa,d A11Ma R..IQM B.rd A,a Red 800111eM 19 d. Re.. WOMB Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. FC-01 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY BY THE CORPORATION OF SPECIFIED AGREEMENTS, DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2000; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF SUCH CERTIFICATES EVIDENCING PRINCIPAL IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $230,000,000; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, CERTIFICATES AND RELATED ACTIONS. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY BY THE CORPORATION OF AMENDMENTS TO SPECIFIED AGREEMENTS, DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS WITH RESPECT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1992 SERIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, CERTIFICATES AND RELATED ACTIONS. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY BY THE CORPORATION OF AMENDMENTS TO SPECIFIED AGREEMENTS, DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS WITH RESPECT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1993 SERIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, CERTIFICATES AND RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (the "District') previously financed the acquisition, construction and installation of certain improvements to its wastewater system (the "Original Project') through the incurrence of certain obligations pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of November 1, 1990 (the "Series A Agreement for Acquisition and Construction"), an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of May 1, 1991 (the"Series B Agreement for Acquisition and Construction')and an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of July 1, 1992 (the "Series C Agreement for Acquisition and Construction'); WHEREAS, in order to finance the Original Project, the District caused to be executed and delivered County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, DOCSLAI355796.4 41758-7 MM3 s California, Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A) (the "SeriesA Certificates") in the aggregate principal component of $100,000,000 and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal component of $80,500,000, County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and I of Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series B) in the aggregate principal component of$117,555,000 and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal component of $15,395,000 (the "Series B Certificates") and County Sanitation District Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C) in the aggregate principal component of $98,500,000 and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal component of$83,800,000 (the "Series C Certificates" and together with the Series A Certificates and the Series B Certificates,the"Prior Certificates"); WHEREAS, in order to achieve credit enhancement and liquidity cost savings, the District desires to refinance the Original Project by exercising its option to prepay certain installment payments to be made by the District pursuant to the Series A Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, the Series B Agreement for Acquisition and Construction and the Series C Agreement for Acquisition and Construction; WHEREAS, the District desires to finance the acquisition, construction and installation of certain improvements to its wastewater system (the "Additional Project") and, together with the Original Project, is hereinafter referred to as the"Project'; WHEREAS, in order to refinance the Original Project and finance the Additional Project, the District desires to purchase the Project from the Corporation, and the Corporation desires to sell the Project to the District, for the installment payments (the "2000 Installment Payments") to be made by the District pursuant to an Installment Purchase Agreement (such Installment Purchase Agreement, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being referred to herein as the "2000 Installment Purchase Agreement"); WHEREAS, the District desires to establish and declare the conditions and terms upon which obligations such as the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement, and the 2000 Installment Payments, and the interest thereon, payable under the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement, are to be incurred and secured, pursuant to a Master Agreement for District Obligations, by and between the District and the Corporation(such Master Agreement for District Obligations, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution,being referred to herein as the"Master Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Corporation proposes to assign without recourse certain of its rights under and pursuant to the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee") pursuant to a Trust Agreement, among the Trustee,the Corporation and the District(such Trust Agreement,in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being referred to herein as the"2000 Trust Agreement"); WHEREAS, in consideration of such assignment and the execution and entering into of this Trust Agreement, the Trustee has agreed to execute and deliver refunding certificates of -2- DOCSLA1:355796.4 41759-7 MM3 participation (the "2000 Certificates"), evidencing direct, undivided fractional interests in the 2000 installment Payments, and the interest thereon, payable under the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement; WHEREAS, pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1992 (the "1992 Original Trust Agreement'), by and among State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee(the"1992 Trustee)and the County Sanitation District No. I of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and County Sanitation District No. I 1 of Orange County, California (collectively, the "Predecessor Districts'j, the 1992 Trustee executed and delivered the County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and I of Orange County, California, Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series (the "1992 Certificates') in the aggregate principal component of $160,600,000 and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal component of$124,170,000; WHEREAS, the 1992 Original Trust Agreement was modified and amended pursuant to a First Supplemental Trust Agreement, by and between the 1992 Trustee and the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts (as so modified and amended, the 1992 First Supplemented Trust Agreement'); WHEREAS, the 1992 Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interests in the installment payments (the "1992 Installment Payments'l to be paid by the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts, under the Amendatory Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of October 1, 1992 '(the "1992 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction"),by and among the Predecessor Districts; WHEREAS, the District proposes to restructure, simplify and make more consistent certain of its obligations, including the 1992 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, and the instruments pursuant to which interests in such obligations, or the payments to be made thereunder, were executed and delivered, including the 1992 First Supplemented Trust Agreement; WHEREAS, to that end, the District desires to modify, amend, reform and restate the 1992 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction pursuant to a Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, by and between the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts, and the Corporation (such Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being referred to herein as the "1992 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction'); WHEREAS, to that end, the District desires to modify, amend, reform and restate the 1992 First Supplemented Trust Agreement pursuant to a Reformed Trust Agreement, by and among the 1992 Trustee, the Corporation and the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts (such Reformed Trust Agreement, in the form presented to this meeting, -3- DDCSLA1:365796.4 41758.7 MM3 with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being referred to herein as the"1992 Reformed Trust Agreement"); WHEREAS, pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1993 (the "1993 Original Trust Agreement"), by and among Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as trustee and the Predecessor Districts, Texas Commerce Bank National Association executed and delivered the County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series (the "1993 Certificates") in the aggregate principal component of $46,000,000 and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal component of$43,600,000; WHEREAS, the 1993 Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interests in the installment payments (the "1993 Installment Payments") to be paid by the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts, under the Amendatory Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of September 1, 1993 (the "1993 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction"), by and among the Predecessor Districts; WHEREAS, the District proposes to restructure, simplify and make more consistent certain of its obligations, including the 1993 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, and the instruments pursuant to which interests in such obligations, or the payments to be made thereunder,were executed and delivered, including the 1993 Original Trust Agreement; WHEREAS, to that end, the District desires to modify, amend, reform and restate the 1993 Agreement for Acquisition and Construction pursuant to a Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, by and between the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts, and the Corporation (such Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being refered to herein as the "1993 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction"); WHEREAS, to that end, the District desires to modify, amend, reform and restate the 1993 Original Trust Agreement pursuant to a Reformed Trust Agreement, by and among The Chase Manhattan Bank, as successor trustee, the Corporation and the District, as successor by consolidation to the Predecessor Districts (such Reformed Trust Agreement, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution,being referred to herein as the"1993 Reformed Trust Agreement"); WHEREAS,there have been prepared and submitted to this meeting fortes of: (a) the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement; (b) the Master Agreement; (c) the 2000 Trust Agreement; (d) the 1992 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction; (e) the 1992 Reformed Trust Agreement; -4- DOCSLA1:355796.4 41759.7 MM3 (t) the 1993 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction;and (g) the 1993 Reformed Trust Agreement; WHEREAS, all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of California to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with the consummation of the actions authorized hereby do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as required by law, and the Corporation is now duly authorized and empowered, pursuant to each and every requirement of law, to consummate such actions for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms herein provided; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District 'Financing Corporation, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. All of the recitals herein contained are true and correct and the Board so finds. Section 2. The 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The President of the Corporation, the Vice-President of the Corporation, the Treasurer of the Corporation and the Secretary of the Corporation, and such other officer of the Corporation as the President may designate (the "Authorized Officers")are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation, to execute and deliver the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement in the form submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 2000 Installment Purchase Agreement by such Authorized Officer; provided, however, that such changes, insertions and omissions shall not authorize an aggregate principal amount of 2000 Installment Payments in excess of$230,000,000 and shall not result in a final 2000 Installment Payment later than August 1, 2035. Section 3. The Master Agreement, in substantially the fort submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation, to execute and deliver the Master Agreement in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Master Agreement by such Authorized Officer. Section 4. The 2000 Trust Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation,to execute and deliver the 2000 Trust Agreement in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer -5- DOC9LA1:355796.4 41759.7 MM3 executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 2000 Trust Agreement by such Authorized Officer. Section 5. The execution and delivery of 2000 Certificates evidencing principal in an aggregate amount of not to exceed $230,000,000, payable in the years and in the amounts, and evidencing direct, undivided factional interests in the 2000 Installment Payments, and the interest thereon, as specified in the 2000 Trust Agreement as finally executed, are hereby authorized and approved. Section 6. The 1992 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation, to execute and deliver the 1992 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 1992 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction by such Authorized Officer. Section 7. The 1992 Reformed Trust Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation,to execute and deliver the 1992 Reformed Trust Agreement in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve,such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 1992 Reformed Trust Agreement by such Authorized Officer. Section S. The 1993 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Corporation, to execute and deliver the 1993 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 1993 Reformed Agreement for Acquisition and Construction by such Authorized Officer. Section 9. The 1993 Reformed Trust Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein, be and the same is hereby approved. The Authorized Officers are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed,for and in the name of the Corporation,to execute and deliver the 1993 Reformed Trust Agreement in the form presented to this meeting,with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve,such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the 1993 Reformed Trust Agreement by such Authorized Officer. -6- DOMW355796A 41759.7 MMl e Section 10. The officers and employees of the Corporation are, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all documents and instruments and to do and cause to be done any and all acts and things necessary or proper for carrying out the execution and delivery of the 2000 Certificates and the transactions contemplated by the agreements or documents referenced in this Resolution. Section 11. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and employees of the Corporation with respect to the execution, delivery and sale of the 2000 Certificates, or in connection with or related to any of the agreements or documents referenced herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. Section 12. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting held August 23, 2000. President, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation APPROVED: General Counsel, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation 7 DOCSLAI:3557%.4 41759.7 MM3 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) as COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, Penny Kyle, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was passed and adopted at a meeting of said Board on the 23rd day of August, 2000, by the following vote,to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation, California, this 23rd day of August, 2000. Secretary, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation DOCSLA13557%.4 41758-7 MM3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng De TO ad of Dr. aizvm AGENDA REPORT Icem Numbe Item Numbs Orange County Sanitation DistIrector FROM: David Ludw of Engineering Originator: Brian Bingman, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: FUZZY FILTER PIPE INSTALLATION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. SP2000-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize General Manager to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder for Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-41, and related equipment purchase in a total amount not to exceed $150,000. SUMMARY The WEFTEC Annual Conference will be held in Anaheim, California, on October 14-18, 2000. One of the activities for the conference is a tour of our facilities. One of the items we would like to show the industry is our extensive pilot testing program. The next item to be tested by the District's Air Quality and Special Projects Division will be a Fuzzy Filter. The Fuzzy Filter will be used for research on filtration of primary effluent. The Fuzzy Filter installation will begin upon the award of a construction contract. The District is planning to purchase several pieces of equipment and have the contractor install them. The Engineer's Estimate for the equipment and Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation, Job No. SP2000-41, is $119,040, which exceeds the current General Manager authority. In order to expedite the Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation, the award of the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder needs to be expedited. Increasing the General Manager's authority, enabling him to award the construction contract, will allow the construction phase to begin as soon as possible. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The work is to be completed within the Facilities Engineering Plant No. 2 budget. The annual budget amount is $1,042,000. G NIB�eDaMOe^tla�uM1 RePoMVant awlmw0uy ruler Piping.13tl.Coc R--d Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Facilities Engineenng Plant No. 2) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with construction as soon as possible could cause the Fuzzy Filter Pipe to not be installed during the WEFTEC Conference. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A aW910WKAPnda Draft R&o Muum Boos T=y vines RpIng ge2=de ae,,,b.. sage Page 2