Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-24 6May 16, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i phone: NOTICE OF MEETING V 141962-2411 mvlleyayymar BOARD OF DIRECTORS 27 Fountan Valley CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9272e-9127 sul add.: 100"Ellis Amnue WEDNESDAY, May 24, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. Nun[ain Valley.CA 92709-7018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Allied. • titles The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Buena Perk Cypress Faun[ u Va lley � Fullertonrton Zia Garden Grove BC rd .Secre{� Huntington Beech ne La Habra to Palma Loa Alamitos Newport Batch Orangenge Placentia Tentatively - Scheduled Uocomina Meetinas Bents An Beal Beach Brenton r sun OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 7,2000 at 5:00 p.m. Nile Park lbrbe Linda PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,June 1,2000 at 5:00 p.m. County or Orange FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 14,2000 at 5:00 p.m. sanleary Districts Coate Ms. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Midway city SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,June 19,2000 at 5:00 p.m.QOCWD Water Districts STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Rench 'To Protect the Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Myteweter Systems' BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meetina June June 28, 2000 July *July 19, 2000 August August23, 2000 September September 27, 2000 October October 25, 2000 November *November 15, 2000 December *December20, 2000 January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 May May 23, 2001 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H1wp.dtalatlmin%BVAgendaU000 Meeting Nofim MN5.2.do j •, ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: May 24. 2000 TIME: 00 im. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................... — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD..................._� ✓ — (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ v i — (CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO................. (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... � C� — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY.......................... � ✓ — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... C — (MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. ✓ _� — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... _ t — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... �G ✓ — (RYAN)............................. GULLIXSON....................... ✓ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ry — (DALY)............................. MC CRACKEN............... . — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. JG ✓ — (SPURGE ................. MURPHY...................... — (RIC VAN .. .......... Nam.............. i ✓ — (FRES ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ ✓ (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ — (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ ✓ — (MAULLER)...................... SIGLER......................... ✓ �G — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... �✓ _� — (MILLER).......................... SWAN........................... _tL — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA.......................... rC �G — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... �� — STAFF: G � Anderson ✓ ��� /. �, rr. Ghirelli Kyle lcbr/X44'r- Ludwin ✓ .L Ilens ✓ 0 �4�"" — Ooten ✓ Tomko ✓ Streed ✓ Tuchman OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus 05/24/00 WadmWstal\wp.dta\admin\BSIDIRECTOR\Dirwtom Roll Call.dw SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT lb e I1!&D BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) �c 1w PF e� C S H:%WP.DTAUWlN %FORM=lGN-IN FORW. Summary of Little Hoover Commission Report on Special District Operations a C.7 p May 22, 2000 OCSD!P.O.Box 6127!Founlaln Valley,CA 9272841127!(714)962d411 Introduction The following white paper provides the Orange County Sanitation District staff s interpretation of the Little Hoover Commission's report on Special Districts:Relics of the Past or Resources for the Future? This report,published in May 2000,details the Commission's findings on Special District operations. The report delineates information under five separate findings. The attached report duplicates the Little Hoover Commission's findings and provides our summary discussion. The report is formatted as follows: • Finding • Recommendation • OCSD Interpretation of Finding • Impact of Findings/Recommendations on OCSD We hope the information provided herein proves useful. If you wish to obtain the full Little Hoover Commission Report please contact the Communications Department or access the document via the Internet at www.ihc.ca.gov/lhc.html. ' Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts— White Paper Summary Finding 1: Special districts are often invisible to the public and policy-makers, compromising oversight and accountability. Recommendation 1: The Governor and Legislature should enact legislation that would make special districts more visible and accountable. Specifically,the legislation should: • Require special districts to actively make their activities visible to the public. • Require special districts to submit information to other local governments. • Encourage special district elections to be held as part of even year general elections. OCSD Interpretation of Findings The Commission believes that because special districts are of a single purpose,providing one specific service such as water, sanitation or fire protection, much of the public doesn't realize that these entities are indeed "governments." As such, the traditional oversight and accountability mechanisms, including public meetings and financial reporting,have not been effective in promoting the kind of"rigorous examination required of democratic institutions." This results, according to the Commission, in a lack of public participation, local-govemment oversight and agency accountability. Impact of LHC Findings/Recommendation on OCSD One of the recommendations of this Finding is to"require special districts to submit information to other local governments." This recommendation has no impact on the Sanitation District, which is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of 25 elected officials representing the 21 cities in our service area,two local sanitary districts,one water district, and a representative of the County's Board of Supervisors. In addition, the Sanitation District has been praised for its longstanding outreach program to local and state elected officials, the general public, as well as specific target audiences including environmentalists, regulators,city public works staffs, and educators. The following is a list of the outreach programs conducted during the past five-year period: • The Rate Advisory Committee(RAC)and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC)—Comprised of representatives from homeowners associations, environmental groups,regulators,city government, and business and industry, the RAC and PAC played a major role in our three-year Strategic Planning effort. Their recommendations for a more "fair and equitable rate structure" and for wastewater treatment options to meet the growing needs of Orange County were brought before our Board of Directors. The Board carefully considered those recommendations,incorporating them into the 1999 Strategic Plan. • Legislators Day—This special event has been held biannually to keep federal, state and local elected officials apprised of the latest Sanitation District programs and developments. • Special Programs for City Managers and Public Works Staff—At least once annually the Sanitation District holds a meeting for this specific group to Little Hoover Commissian Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary discuss infrastructure issues, including best management practices and associated costs for maintaining the County's 12,000 miles of sewer lines. • Outreach to the Media—In addition to personal telephone calls made to the media to apprise them of District developments, both of the County's major newspapers receive all Board committee and regular meeting agenda packages. • Tours and Special Presentations—More than 1,000 visitors tour the Sanitation District annually. Each of these individuals receives an information packet that includes financial data. In addition,the Sanitation District has made its facilities available to the Council of Governments and to LAFCO for their meetings. • Orange County Fair—For nearly a decade the Sanitation District has maintained a booth at the Orange County Fair, which is attended by hundreds of thousands of guests annually. Employees staffing the booth are specially trained and available to answer the public's questions.District financial data is also distributed. • Internet web site—The Sanitation District maintains a comprehensive Web site that includes extensive financial data. In the past nine months, nearly 7,000 individuals have visited the site. In addition to the above,the District receives hundreds of calls annually from the public requesting general information. Staff is always available to answer those questions. Finding 2: Local Agency Formation Commissions, by not aggressively scrutinizing the organization of specific districts, have failed to promote the efficient and effective evolution of local government. Recommendation 2: The State should provide LAFCOs with the direction and resources necessary to make them a catalyst for the effective and efficient evolution of independent special districts. Specifically, the Governor and Legislature should: • Require periodic and specific reviews of independent special districts. • Enhance the independence of LAFCOs. • Require shared funding of LAFCOs (e.g. special district and city participation). • Require special districts subject to study to pay for the study. OCSD Interpretation of Findings The Little Hoover Commission was forthcoming in their review of LAFCOs and their widespread failure to accomplish specific elements of their Mission—specifically the examination of special district agencies and reorganization or consolidation related thereto. In a three-year period,LAFCOs throughout the state initiated only 18 reorganization studies of special districts of which only one resulted in actual elimination of a special district. The Commission recognized that external factors were significant contributors to LAFCO's failures in the special district area. These included: 1) Permissive and vague State policy, 2)Lack of LAFCO independence from county 2 Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Disuicts—White Paper Summary influence,3)Inadequate funding of LAFCOs,and 4)The organizational/political structure of many LAFCOs. By resolving these problems through the recommendations noted above, the Commission believed LAFCOs could be efficient,effective and independent bodies capable of accomplishing its mission. Interestingly,the Commission on Local Governance in the 21'Century had very similar observations relative to LAFCOs. They too believed that LAFCOs needed to be re-engineered to be effective participants in government reform. Although the various recommendations should bring about desired changes,it will be difficult, as implied in the little Hoover Commission's report, to implement them without state mandate. The recommendations noted require both fiscal sacrifice and shifts in political power. Because of this,implementation without state legislation will only occur on a sporadic basis. Impact of LAC FindingsMocommendation on OCSD The impact on OCSD is uncertain,though likely not detrimental,if the recommendations above are implemented. Orange County LAFCO and the District have cooperated in the past in consolidation of our various districts into one organization. The District fairs well in comparison to most special district organizations and very likely would not be the target of dissolution based on the Commission's proposed guidelines for organizational review. Rather,if consolidation efforts were undertaken by Orange County LAFCO,it is quite probable OCSD would be considered a parent agency able to absorb the responsibilities of other smaller districts with similar missions. What is more likely in the shorter term is a requirement for the Sanitation District to pay annual fees to support the LAFCO organization.Special districts throughout Orange County could be obligated to fund one-third of OCLAFCO's net operating budget (approximately$500,000 in FY M99). OCSD's share would be a small proportion of that one-third. This would be calculated as the percentage our operating budget represents compared to the sum total of all operating budgets for the special districts in Orange County(of which there are 29). Note that this formula is just a preliminary suggestion by the Commission on Local Governance in the 20 Century and is certainly subject to modification. Other,though improbable,fiscal impacts that may transpire are associated with LAFCO auditing OCSD. If the recommendations above are mandated, then the District would be obligated to pay for such an audit with costs ranging from $50,000 to$100,000 dependent upon scope of work. Finding 3: Policy-makers and community leaders lack the analytical tools necessary to assess the benefits of consolidation,impeding their ability to advocate effectively for change and overcome the tenacity of the status quo. Recommendation 3: To equip policy-makers and the public with the tools necessary to assess and guide the organization of independent special districts,the Governor and Legislature should establish a program at the California Policy Research Center,or similar institute,to do the following: • Develop guidelines and protocols for special district consolidations. 3 Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary • Study the long-term outcomes of consolidations and reorganizations. • Establish a cadre of trainers to assist LAFCOs and their staff. • Develop performance measures at the special district level that are meaningful to constituents. OCSD Interpretation of Findings According to the Commission's report, policy-makers and community leaders need the appropriate analytical tools to be able to assess local government performance and identify opportunities for reorganizations based on this empirical evidence. It was indicated that LAFCOs are generally lacking in such expertise—both in guidelines and protocols establishing WHEN and HOW special district consolidation audits should take place as well as WHAT is the outcome,based on sound analysis,of consolidations once they occur. In brief, many LAFCOs apparently lack either the technical expertise and/or analytical staff to perform these functions. According to the Commission's report, "Lacking reliable data to support reorganization proposals,LAFCOs and community leaders find themselves at a disadvantage to the politically and emotionally charged forces that often align in defense of the status quo." Without the capability to conduct thorough analysis, and absent a robust set of metrics to measure efficiency, effectiveness and service quality, LAFCOs will continue to struggle to accomplish their core mission. Impact of LHC Findings%ecommendation on OCSD There is no impact to our District related to these particular issues. As previously stated, LAFCO was provided more than sufficient analytical data,developed by District staff,to support consolidation of our various districts. Furthermore, OCSD is widely recognized as having some of the best financial,operational and administrative data that allows us to be benchmarked against other special districts. Finding 4: Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi-million dollar reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional or statewide infrastructure planning. Recommendation 4: The Governor and Legislature should enact policies that will ensure prudent management of special district reserve funds and incorporate these resources into regional and statewide infrastructure planning. Specifically, the State should require: • Districts to publicize their reserves. • Policymakers to integrate enterprise district reserve information into infrastructure planning. • Guidelines for pmdent reserves. 4 Link Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts- vatte paper Summary OCSD Interpretation of Findings The LHC Report categorizes special districts as dependent or independent and as enterprise or non-enterprise. Generally, independent special districts have elected boards or are not governed by a city council or county. Enterprise special districts are those that can levy fees for service. Thus,OCSD is an independent enterprise special district. The LHC reports that at June 30, 1997,enterprise special districts held retained earnings of $18.2 billion,while non-enterprise special districts held fund balances totaling$1.2 billion. Thus the focus of the report is upon enterprise special districts. The LHC Report makes the terms retained earnings,fund balance and reserves equal,and then implies that all three are synonymous with cash. This is incorrect. The report correctly states that retained earnings are the difference between revenue and expenditures. However, it fails to consider that purchases or construction of assets are not considered an expenditure under the rules of accounting. Clearly revenues applied to asset accumulation also increase retained earnings, but they do not increase cash. It is safe to assume that the actual cash balances of enterprise special districts are much less than the$18.2 billion retained earnings reported. This accounting error should not distract us from the sense of the report's findings and recommendations,but it is an important technicality that must be addressed and kept in mind while reviewing the report. For example, the report states that"reserves of many enterprise special districts are growing, indicating that revenue may be exceeding the cost of providing service." Whether reserves means cash or retained earnings may make this statement acceptable or just plain wrong. Even if cash and retained earnings were the same,this statement reflects a very short-term view of the"cost of providing service." Commission Conclusions Some reserves appear unreasonably Iarae. This conclusion seems to be based upon poor understanding of the existence and purpose of reserves. Of course,this observation could have been tempered if they had reviewed the actual cash balances. District resources are not integrated into infrastructure planning. The LHC observed that special districts are not required to participate in the development of county or city general plans or to cooperate and coordinate their activities with neighboring local governments. They concluded that special district finances and activities are thus often unknown to other policymakers and not integrated in local,regional or state infrastructure planning and financing. While acknowledging that special districts play an impartial role in providing infrastructure, the LHC asks if they should ever be eligible for State help considering their large financial resources. Special district reserves are obscure. Financial reporting rules do not require information to be presented in ways that provide for the public or policymakers to understand or scrutinize how districts use public funds in general, and reserves in particular. The report itself proves this point. 5 Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts- a to Paper Summary There are no guidelines for prudent reserves. The LHC talked to 10 enterprise districts that rank in their top 25 among enterprise districts for retained earnings. Five reported they had reserve policies and 5 reported they did not. Among those that had policies, there is a wide variation in what is considered appropriate. Implementing the Recommendation Develop solutions to particular problems. Where abuses or excesses are identified,the first and preferable alternative is for community leaders and district officials to work together to resolve problems. Solutions should include implementation of policies for the prudent accumulation and use of reserves. Determining and reauirine prudent reserves. The LHC reviewed guidelines from the Government Finance Officers Association,the League of California Cities, the International City Managers Association,several cities and special districts,and found no consistent principles. They suggest a complete survey of reserve policies and practices in order to develop benchmarks and to facilitate discussions. Making reserves variable. The biggest problem with reserves is that the public and policymakers do not know about them. Information should be easily accessible, and routinely provided. Reserve purposes and amounts should be clearly identified and explained in financial reports tailored to the needs of the public and policymakers. Integrating reserve information in infrastructure planning. Some districts have been criticized for impeding effective regional planning and have exempted themselves fiscally and programmatically from the process. It may be possible to apply some district reserves to regional infrastructure needs if all parties involved are knowledgeable and communicating. This cooperation may be enhanced by boundary changes,consolidations or reassigning responsibilities. Existing OCSD Policy(Practice/Experience/Plans In 1997, the OCSD retained Public Financial Management to review our long-standing reserve policy and to propose revisions as appropriate. A part of this work involved a survey of 24 public wastewater,water and utility agencies. The results were summarized and benchmarks were developed. The result was a revised reserves policy which was reviewed and approved by the FAHR Committee in May of 1998. Since adoption, this policy has been included in every budget document,comprehensive annual report,and budget presentation. It was also presented to the RAC and PAC during the Strategic Plan preparation process. The policy establishes 5 categories of reserves: • Insurance/Liability Reserve is intended to address the full range of general and extraordinary liabilities,as well as earthquake, Flood and fire damage. The District 6 Leak Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary has fairly high deductibles and only moderate amounts of insurance in order to contain costs. The probable maximum total loss to the Plants from a 7.5 earthquake is estimated at$495 million. The target amount for this reserve category is $57 million. • Cash flow/Contingency Reserve is made up of the sum of 1)six months of total operating costs,plus 2) 10%of operating costs,plus 3)the August COP service payments. Because the District's user fees and taxes are collected on the property tax bill, we receive very little income during the first six months of the year. Funds must be on hand at the beginning of the year to meet requirements during this funding dry- period. • Capital Projects Reserve are to pay for additions, improvements and rehabilitation to the$1.4 billion sewerage system. The District has implemented a 50:50 mix of pay- as-you-go and debt financing for capital improvements. The average annual capital improvement budget for 1998 to 2020 was$82 million, so a reserve level of$41 million was targeted. • Short-term Specific Capital Projects Reserves was established for projects that would be in progress before the next COP issue. Even though we have a 50:50 pay-as-you- go policy, the last new money COP issue was in 1992. The next new money issue is scheduled for 2000. All projects in the intervening years were paid for from reserves. The LHC reports that the League of California Cities does not include these types of accumulated funds as reserves. A target of$122 million was established for this category,equal at the time to our estimated share of the GWRS. • Renewal/Replacement Reserve was a new category established after a consultant's review of our existing fixed assets and development of a rehabilitation and replacement schedule and computer model. The FAHR Committee reviewed the model and adopted a policy in May 1998. Basically,30%of annual renewal/replacement needs will be funded from these reserves. The initial balance in this reserve was established at$50 million,to be augmented annually from user fees. • Rate Stabilization Reserves account for the balance of accumulated funds. No target was established for this category. All funds in this reserve are available for use in the subsequent year and are used to reduce fluctuations in the annual user fee rates caused mainly by changing capital program needs. • Debt Service Reserves are sometimes required for long-term borrowing. Typically these are funded in an amount equal to 10%of the amount borrowed. These funds are controlled by Trustee Banks for the issue and are intended to assure the lenders that at least one annual payment would be made while a new financial plan was developed in case of a fiscal crises. The current requirement for these reserves is$33 million. 7 Little Hooper Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary Impact of LHC Findings/Recommendation on OCSD The OCSD seems to have complied with all of the requirements or facets of"prudent management of special district reserve funds." We have publicized our reserves and policy through the budget,the CAFR,our website and the Strategic Plan process. We have shared our policy and reserve balances with each of the cities,the county and several special districts in our service area through the Directors,through meetings with staff,through the cooperative projects program,and through the Strategic Plan process. We have adopted a simple,easy to understand reserves policy, and we repeat it in nearly every publication. One of the factors not considered,or included,in the LHC report is the use of cash and investment reserves to offset the interest rate risk associated with variable rate borrowing. The District has been very successful in reducing long-term borrowing costs through this practice. Because most of our investments are required to be relatively short-term,our interest earnings increase when our interest expense increase. In this way we also always have funds available for principal and interest payments. Additionally,the rating agencies have been very impressed with our financial stability and management, and our ability to retire the variable rate COPs, if needed,and have rewarded us with a high credit rating, which will also reduce the cost of borrowing. Our outstanding variable rate debt balance is $174 million. Finding 5: Property tax allocations to some enterprise districts create inequities among districts and distort the true costs of services. A significant portion of the property tax allocated to all enterprise districts subsidizes districts with the highest reserves. Recommendation 5: Policymakers should scrutinize the appropriateness of maintaining property tax allocations to enterprise districts. Among the alternatives are: • Annually review the level of property tax support. • Examine all allocations to enterprise districts. • Require a State audit of some districts(those with high reserves who receive property taxes). • Allow counties to reclaim and reallocate property tax revenues. • Enhance public understanding of property tax allocation. OCSD Interpretation of Findings According to the LHC report,enterprise special districts like us received$421 trillion in property tax revenues in 1996-97. Of that amount 36%or$103 million went to 15 districts that also had some of the largest reserves. Our property tax receipts for that year were$28 million. To the LHC there are two problems: first,enterprise districts can levy fees for service while other districts cannot; second,districts that may have considerable resources are"subsidized"by property taxes. 8 Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary Prior to the 1978 passage of Proposition 13, special districts like other agencies established annual property tax rates to meet their needs and philosophies. Subsequent to Proposition 13, they can no longer do that; a share of the 1%basic levy is allocated by law based upon actual tax levies for 1975-78. Current need does not affect this allocation and the district cannot change it. About half of the enterprise special districts receive some share of the property tax allocation,while 78%of the wastewater special districts receive property taxes. The OCSD average allocation is 2.8% of the 1% basic levy,but it varies by tax rate area and by city. Many studies of state and local government finance have considered property tax allocations,but consensus on solutions has been elusive. • California Constitution Revision Commission recommended each county form a citizen charter commission to allocate the non-school portion of the property tax. • Commission on Governance for the 21st Century suggested that"future government reformers may wish to consider reallocating a portion of property tax revenues currently accruing to enterprise districts . . " • Speaker's Commission on State and Local Government Finance recommended that property tax revenues be reported to the public by a state agency or by county auditors. • Senate Committee on Local Government identified property tax allocations to enterprise special districts as one of four policy issues for 2000. • Legislative Analyst was directed by the Legislature to identify alternatives for restructuring the property tax allocation. The Legislative Analyst noted that the current allocations are based on 25-year old formulas that do not reflect today's needs, that there is a tension between special purpose agencies and general purpose governments, and that allocating taxes to enterprise special districts may have discouraged them from evolving to user fees. Existing OCSD Policy/PracticelExpenence/Future Plans Except in Revenue Areas 13 and 14, the OCSD receives a share of the 1%basic levy property tax. This percentage averages approximately 2.8%but varies considerably. We have no taxes for GO Bonds. The total property tax budget for 1999-2000 was$32 million. In 1991,the Board adopted a policy of dedicating property tax receipts to COP service. The budgeted COP service for 1999-2000, excluding a proposed new issue,was$31 million. 9 Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary j Impact of LHC Recommendation on OCSD While the recommendation calls for property taxes to be "scrutinized,"the intent seems to be to reduce or eliminate property tax allocations to enterprise special districts, especially those with large reserves. There is a current Legislative effort,AB 1396,directed at property tax revenue. Our understanding is that the chair of the conference committee, Senator Peace,has opened the discussion with a call for a"blank piece of paper" approach. If property taxes are diverted from the District, it would take a$38 increase in the annual SFR user fee to replace the lost revenues. If the lost property taxes were not replaced, the reserve balances would eventually be reduced to unsafe levels,perhaps to zero. In that case,the interest income would correspondingly decrease. In order to replace the lost interest income, the Single-Family Resident(SRF) user fee would need to be increased an additional $32 per year. The combined annual fee increase to recover lost property taxes and interest would be an 87% increase,or$70 per year. 10 i 4_ Orange I I^^ y Pacteding the public health and the er While Professional Secretaries Day was celebrated in April,we just couldn't let the occasion go by without honoring one of our own hardworking, behind-the- scenes individuals. And so,the May E m I o e e Spotlight shines on Laurie von V Winckelmann, secretary for the w V, p / Source Control division of the ,,.{ Technical Services Department. Spotlight - = Laurie, a native Californian, was born t'."� at St. Joseph's Hospital in the City of I Laurie von Orange. She was raised in Fountain tl Valley and attended Los Amigos High School. After graduation, she decided to Winckelmann attend court-reporting college. While there, Administrative afriend(Ron Wade's wife, Alison)told her about a job opening at the District. Laurie decided Assistant to toss her stenograph machine in favor of a steno pad and apply for the position. Division 640 She was hired in August 1985 as a clerk in the Industrial Waste division(now Source Control). In 1988, she was promoted to secretary and currently reports to Mahin Talebi. Laurie's lob duties include supporting our NPDES reporting require- ment efforts such as the annual report,the semi-annual report and local limits, which go to the EPA and to the Regional Board. She also supports the 35 staff members in her division. inside: Laurie is married and has two children-Trevor, 6 and Ashley, 2. Laurie met her Huntington Beach husband, Mike von Winckelmann, right here at the District in May 1990. Mike Dye Study continued on page 6 Security Survey How Do 1 Love Thee? Results So far,we've had 42 attempts and it some element of luck enabled us to Bob Oaten shows no sign of stopping. ride this one out. CWEA President 2000 Staving on Thursday, May 4,the According to Patrick Miles, "Security Injection Well Internet virus ILOVEYOU started to is a constantly moving target. We all Project at Plant No. t replicate around the world. It is need to do our part." Remember the acknowledged as the fastest-spreading following rules-of-thumb: Information Technology virus ever. It spreads using Outlook Road Map addresses with an enticing subject. • If you receive any suspicious attach- How can you resist a love letter? Click, ments, delete them. Don't take a First Annual bang you're infected and spreading it to chance. OC Trash Bash the people in your address book. • Do not download any executables. You could be asking for trouble. CWEA "Best Engineering The District was unaffected. Anti-virus • When in doubt, call the IT Help Desk 9 g software is in place that screens every for assistance. Wastewater Project" e-mail attachment for infection. If any is found, the attachment is cleaned or If you have any questions, please OC Fair Update removed and the involved people are contact any member of the Information notified. Good planning, execution and Technology Team. NP Diego(41/2 years of service) Michelle accepted a position as vice president of NCG Porter Novell,a large public affairs firm with an offlice in Orange County(Irvine). They also have offices in San in Sacramento. Spotlight-continued from page We're Spicin' it up! works in the Microbiology section of _ _ t 00 `c'cz F the Lab. "During a Department meet- ing, we were all asked to stand up and - � ` L � p O introduce the person next to us," t' ig recalled Laurie. "Mike was sitting behind me and had to introduce Mad E Volunteer to Work Kogan. After he finished the introduc- tion and sat down, I turned around, ��flll at the Fair boldly grabbed his notebook, and wrote Things are really heating up as the 'nice job.' Then, I turned sideways in date draws nearer for this ear's my chair to get his attention." _ _ Orange County Fair,which starts July Laurie went so far as to assign scouts `-' 14 and runs till July 30. Be on the to inform her of Mike's whereabouts, lookout for volunteer sign-up sheets so she could "accidentally" bump into that will be sent to everyone by e-mail. him. "I just thought he was s0000 The whole von Winkelmann family Christmas If you'd like to volunteer for one or cute,"she admitted. Well, Mike finally 1999-Laurie,Trevor,Ashley and M a. more shifts to help staff the District's booth at the fair,fill out the form and got the hint and asked her to have Laurie and Mike are currently remod- submit it to Rosa McArthur lunch with him. After dating for two eling and re-landscaping their house in (McArthurrl@aol.comi, who is in years, Mike proposed. "One day in Huntington Beach. For relaxation, they charge of scheduling OCSD employee January after we had dinner, Mike love to go camping in their travel trailer. work shifts at the fair. If you do not asked me to go for a walk along the One of their favorite camping vacations receive a sign-up sheet or have any Balboa boardwalk. He was walking was a two-week trip to Yellowstone other questions, you can also contact very fast and was almost dragging me National Parkin Wyoming. Ingrid Hellebrand at ext.7115. along behind him. I was wearing high heels and couldn't figure out why he "It's nice to have a job where you can There are plenty of benefits for was in such a hurry,"said Laurie. "He still spend quality time with your representing the District at the fair. finally stopped on the right side of the family,"said Laurie. "The people make All employees that work at least one pier next to(where else?(one of the the lob. I really love working here." shift at the fair will receive a free District's sampling points. He pulled a box out of his pocket and said, 'Oh, Laurie von Winckelmann...u beat. T-shirt designed especially for this what's this? Why don't you open it?'" p year's fair. You will also be invited positive, and with a smile that could to the post-fair luncheon party at the When she did, she found a ring inside. brighten anyone's day. You're right, Claim Jumper restaurant on August 8. They have been married for nearly eight Laurie. It is the people who make the years and are still having fun, even job. You area shining example to us all And there's more... employees who though their jobs and family keep them and you have truly learned the meaning work during their non-working hours extremely busy. of teamwork-for you practice it every will receive one raffle ticket for each day. NP non-working hour worked. Increase your chances of winning some of the over thirty fabulous prizes that will be IDEA AWARDS` raffled off at the post-fair party by C would _ to recognize the volunteering for more non-working recipients of_ aEA Awards ... Congratulations! hour shifts. Look for more details on bulletin Bill Aldridge Pedestrian Crosswalk Safety 03/30/00 boards in your area. A fair entertain- Tracey Murphy Primary Basins 3,4 8 5 Launder Level Alarms/Indicators 04/03/00 ment schedule and a sample of the William Wallin Belt Press Fail Safe Rewiring 04/19/00 T-shirt design will also be posted. Additional T-shirts will be available for purchase at a great price! NP h Mv/1WJ 1The News P,hm wnv,CCSasem _ _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on d y 24 was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on.(7 _ /� , 2U��. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this "day of zodd. Penny M. Kyle, Secrete Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 11RADOWDATA7\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary May 17, 2000 Phan.: (714)962-2411 awaw.w .aa; To the Chair and Members Po. Box B127 of the Board of Directors Fountain Valley.G 92728-8127 Subject: Board Letter sense add.: 18644 Elbs Avenue Faunae,Valle,CA 92708-7018 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information on any of the items, please call me. Annual Financial Report and Julie Matsumoto Win Awards! Mamter Agencies • The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been cities awarded to the Orange County Sanitation District by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive Anona;m annual financial report (CAFR) published for the year ended June 30, 1999. The ere. euene Park Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of Cypress governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a Fountain money significant accomplishment b a government and its management. This is the sixth Fullerton Valley 9 P Y 9 9 Gordan G.ra consecutive year the District has received this award. An Award of Financial Handngron Beach lrwne Reporting Achievement has also been awarded by GFOA to Julie Matsumoto as the L.Habra primary staff person responsible for preparing the District's award-winning CAFR. L. Palma Los rr acon B Newport Greacn anga CASA Meets in San Diego A.canub $.ea A. seal tease CASA(California Association of Sanitation Agencies) held its spring conference in st,nan San Diego May 4-6. A highlight of the meeting was a presentation by Mr. Richard Van Perk Terzian, Chairman of the Little Hoover Commission, on the findings contained in the roroe Linda Commission's May 2000 Report titled Special Districts: Relics of the Past or count, or orange Resources for the Future? The report calls for improved public involvement and scrutiny in the operations of special districts and more vigorous review of the sanitary Districts resources and reserves held by special districts. The report will be considered next by the joint legislative Conference Committee on AB 1936 (Villaraigosa)that is costa mesa considering local government finance reform. CASA, along with other association midway cry lobbyists, are engaged in the discussions surrounding this effort, and we will keep Water Districts you informed as the committee deliberations progress. Further information about the trine Raneh report and other CASA happenings are contained in the CASA Executive Director's Report by Mike Dillon (copy attached). 'To Protect the Pudic Heats end the Eneironmen,txwtgh Excellence in ULNeteweter Syareme" Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 May 17, 2000 Composition and Distribution of Beach Debris in Orange Court For decades, beach debris has been recognized as both an aesthetic and ecological problem. In response, local environmental and civic groups conduct organized beach clean-up days. In addition, beach cities actively carry out routine beach clean-up activities using large mechanized equipment. However, these clean-up efforts usually focus on larger debris and trash. The Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCW RP) recently conducted the first systematic study of Orange County beach debris. Using a statistically rigorous sampling protocol, SCCW RP analyzed 43 sites from Seal Beach to San Clemente during August and September 1998. SCCW RP found: ♦ More than 106 million items, weighing approximately 13 tons. ♦ This amount exceeded the amount of debris collected for the entire state during the 1998 California Coastal Cleanup Day and was 50 times more than the debris collected in Orange County. This difference was attributed to the focus on large debris items during these coastal clean-up efforts. Plastic was the most abundant debris found. "Nerdles"(pre-production plastic used to manufacture finished plastic products)was the most abundant item found overall. Nerdles were found after sieving the sand and are believed to get to the beach from stormwater runoff and offshore shipping sources. • Remote low-use rocky shorelines, in general, had more debris than high-use sandy beaches. This indicates that waterbome sources, boats for example, are the primary source of this debris. ♦ SCCW RP identified four major pathways: (1) littering by beach goers; (2)wind transport from inland areas; (3)water transport from inland areas; and (4) overboard disposal from boating activities. Both federal and state water quality agencies have been evaluating regulations related to trash and debris. The results of SCCW RP's study are already finding their way into this regulatory arena. The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, for example, has proposed "trash TMDLs" in 11 water bodies to control the amount of trash and debris entering the region's waterways and coastal waters. It is uncertain at this time whether other regional boards, including the Santa Ana region, will adopt trash TMDLs. oq.. Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 May 17. 2000 Biosolids Update On March 28, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance that banned the use of all forms of biosolids, including Exceptional Quality biosolids compost. On May 5, the first reading of the biosolids ordinance was delayed for 60 days. Apparently the delay was caused by Imperial County counsel not providing the requested changes to the language in the ordinance in time to be heard at the May 5 Board of Supervisors' meeting. Increased pressure and threats of litigation from producers of Exceptional Quality biosolids may also be contributing to this delay. On April 24, Senate Bill 1956 was scheduled to be voted on by the Senate Environmental Quality Committee. Unfortunately, the bill was pulled at the author's request due to the fact that the State Water Resources Control Board's (SW RCB) Statewide General Order biosolids regulation had not been finalized prior to the Committee meeting. This bill, being based on the SW RCB Statewide General Order, was determined to be premature for the purpose of proceeding through the legislative process. Senate Bill 1956 would have resulted in the adoption of a statewide, science-based, uniform regulation for the land application of biosolids in California. The bill would have preempted local control over biosolids recycling unless the local regulation is based on substantial, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence that shows an unreasonable adverse effect would exist on the environment or public health within the local jurisdiction. The bill generated outrage in the agricultural community and was actively opposed by numerous agricultural interests. The author has requested that a hearing on the science related to biosolids recycling be scheduled this fall for the Senate Environmental Quality Committee. In Kern County, the Yakima Company has decided to rescind its application for a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed composting facility in western Kern County. After several community meetings and numerous discussions with Kern County officials, the Yakima Company believes that relocating the facility to another site in the San Joaquin valley would be prudent. The District's contract with the Yakima Company for biosolids composting specifically at the previously proposed composting site is in the process of being rescinded.Attached for your review is an article that recently appeared in the Bakersfield Californian on this subject along with several other biosolids-related articles. On May 1. Synagro Technologies, Inc. (one of the District's four biosolids management contractors)announced that it has entered into a stock purchase agreement to acquire the Bid Gro business from Waste Management, Inc. (another of the District's biosolids management contractors). Synagro will maintain Bid Gro's status as a leader in providing biosolids management services. Synagro is the fastest growing company focused on biosolids management services, and has operations Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 May 17, 2000 located throughout the country.The acquisition should be completed by June 30, 2000. This acquisition will reduce the diversity of the District's biosolids management program only in the number of service providers. On May 10, Blake Anderson and Mike Moore met with Kings County Supervisor Jon Ratchford to discuss biosolids issues in Kings County. Blake made a commitment that the District will be strong environmental stewards of the land that the District just purchased in Kings County. Blake also stated that the District will comply with not only the letter but also the spirit of the Kings County biosolids ordinance that is expected to be adopted in the next few months. Blake Anderson was a guest speaker at the Great Valley Center's annual regional conference, "Our Place in the World 3 -Central Valley Mosaic" held in Sacramento on May 11. He was a panelist discussing"Biosolids: Local Bane or Boon?" Blake's presentation entitled 'The Case for Biosolids in Agriculture"presented a holistic approach on biosolids recycling from agricultural products, to markets, to consumers, and back to agriculture. He highlighted biosolids issues related to product quality, public policy, business sense, crop productivity, regulatory requirements, and public perception concerns. Santa Ana River Watershed Group Annual Meeting In the event you missed the hard copy, attached is the Program and Registration Form for the 2ntl Annual Santa Ana River Watershed Planning Meeting scheduled for Thursday-Friday, June 1-2 at the Ontario DoubleTree Hotel (the meeting is being managed by the Urban Water Institute). Thursday afternoon will focus on a scoping of efforts in the Watershed (the Organics Center, Water Supply and Quality, Conservation and Urban Transition, and Watershed Partnerships). Dinner Thursday night will celebrate the progress that has been made on a number of initiatives in the watershed. The Friday session is for the Group to report to the broader constituency of people in the watershed. If you are interested in attending the meeting, please contact Jean Tappan at 714 593-7101 and she will make the arrangements for you. Proposed/Pending Legislation: Directors Compensation—SB 1559 At the request and urging of the Board of Directors and with the support and assistance of CASA, legislation was introduced last year to provide for an authorization to increase director's fees/compensation. The bill proceeded through the committees and both houses of the legislature without any meaningful opposition. The bill was passed but vetoed by Governor Davis. Members of the Board of Directors Page 5 May 17, 2000 The proposal has been resubmitted during the current session of the Legislature and again is proceeding through committees without opposition. The bill is slightly different than last year to address the Governor's objections to the rate of pay per meeting. The CASA Legislative lobbyist advises me that the author(Senator David Kelley, San Diego) is now very confident of enactment with approval of the Governor signing in into law. The bill does not have the Legislature increase the rate of pay for District Directors, but rather delegates authority to the Board of Directors of each local agency to establish the amount of fees to be paid for days of service. OCSD City and Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey for FV `98-99 The Collection Facilities O&M Division is responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the regional wastewater conveyance system upstream of the two Treatment Facilities, in accordance with our NPDES Permit. OCSD is not responsible, however, for the daily operation, maintenance, planning, and rehabilitation of the regional "satellite systems"owned and operated by the OCSD Member Cities and Sewering Agencies. In the fall of 1997, District staff created a strategic goal to develop a Collection System O&M Outreach Program with the Member Cities and Agencies. The outreach effort uses survey forms and focused meetings to interface with each member's staff. The goals were to become more knowledgeable of the assets managed by others, leverage expertise, and promote improved networking among system owner/operators. Annually, OCSD staff develops a questionnaire in the fall, schedules and conducts meetings with the Member Cities and Sewering Agencies thru the winter, and produces a final report in the spring. Meeting times range from forty-five minutes to three hours plus travel time for the OCSD team. Each Director will receive a copy of the report. Copies will also be sent to the participating satellite system operators and the city or agency manager. We are also developing an electronic version of the database that should be up and running in the next twelve months. Our goal is to provide all participants the capability to sort, compile and utilize the data in a paperless format. We expect to distribute the first copies at the June OMTS Committee Meeting. We thank the city and agency staffs for participating. Feedback we receive continues to support the fact that time is well spent on this value added effort. Members of the Board of Directors Page 6 May 17, 2000 Any questions: contact Nick Amontes at 714 593-7210 or by e-mail at narhontesCocsd.com Monthly Odor Complaints Report The monthly report on odor complaints is included in the attachments. It breaks down the calls received by location—Plant 1, Plant 2 or Collections System. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt N:1WP OTAU MIMAMLLETTERS TO THE BOPA09T-0521 DCC Attachments CASA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT May 5, 2000 By Mike Dillon I. IT'S"WATCH AND WAIT"IN AN ELECTION YEAR Sacramento lobbyists and the Capitol press corps spent the fast few months of the new millennium waiting for work to commence for the 2000 legislative session. A few measures were hold-overs from the previous session,which needed to adhere to legislative deadlines at the end of January. However,for the most part,the legislature grinded to a halt during the month of February, as the candidates prepared for a highly contentious March Primary,on March 7. Of note was a race in Senate District 21 where Assemblyman Jack Scott defeated Assemblyman Scott Wildman for the Democratic nomination. Vying for the seat in Senate District 23, Assemblywoman Sheila Kuehl defeated Assemblyman Wally Knox for the Democrat nomination. Lastly,Assemblyman Ed Vincent defeated Assemblyman Dick Floyd for the Senate District 25 seat. 11. LEADERSHIP CHANGES IN THE ASSEMBLY AND SENATE With Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa(D-Los Angeles)termed out at the end of this year's session,the Assembly Democrats began grooming a new heir apparent in the fall to succeed Speaker Villaraigosa. On April 13, 2000 Assemblyman Robert Hertzberg(D-Van Nuys) was officially swom in as Speaker. Hertzberg,the former Chair of the powerful Assembly Rules Committee,immediately named a successor to his position on Assembly Rules, in Assemblyman Dennis Cardoza. The Speaker's office has confirmed that the rest of Speaker Hertzberg's new leadership team is still under negotiation. Meanwhile Senator Ross Johnson has stepped down as Senate Republican Leader,citing the poor health of his mother, wife, and his daughter, who is recovering from surgery. He noted that he was unable to commit the necessary time needed to the position, in light of these important family issues. His successor, Senator Jim Brulte will now assume the role of Republican Leader, effective immediately. 111. LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE REFORM EFFORTS CONTINUE In March,the Speaker's Commission on State and Local Government Finance released its final report,and recommendations identifying"appropriate and viable fiscal reform measures for California." In the overview of the report, entitled"Message from the Chair,"Commission Chairman, David Abel states, "In the unanimous opinion of the Commission,more than two 1 decades of neglect and band-aid responses to the unintended consequences of Proposition 13 need to end quickly. We must shift gears and return to our long held tradition of community independence and authority if the California we treasure is to be passed along to future generations..." Specifically,the Commission's Final Recommendations are as follows: "1) Within each county, the county and each city would swap a portion of their locally levied sales tax with the State far an equal amount of the property tax. The locally levied 1%sales tax rate would be reduced to.5%and the State rate would be raised by.5a/o. An equal amount of property tax would be shied from K-14 entities. The State, using the new revenue from the.5% of the sales tax, would baclfill educational programs through the State Aid system. 2)Return $1 billion of property taxes to counties, cities and special districts from the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF)in each county or other State sources over time in annual installments of not less than$100 million, provided the t the grototh in any year of per capita non-proposition 98 general fund revenue exceeds the statewide consumer price index for the prior year. 3) Existing lary requires the State to replace the reduced fee revenue unth other State resources. Create a constitutional obligation on the part of the State to maintain the per capita subvention and replace the revenue lost due to the reduction in the Vehicle License Fee. 4) The existing.5% 'transactions and use'taxing authority mould be moved into the Constitution so that voters, upon their approval of this proposal, would have the assurance that the resultant revenues could not be used to supplant State spending. The allocation of those revenues nrould be based on local agreement." In the section entitled"Increased Accountability,"the Commission has recommended that the state adopt: 1) State and Local Performance Measures,2) Adopt a State/County Service Compact spelling out roles,responsibilities,duties,etc.3)Encourage counties to implement county budgets that distinguish the role of the county in providing countywide services from its"urban service"responsibilities for unincorporated areas of the county, and 4)"Requires the county auditor or appropriate State agency to report annually the amount and relative share of the property tax revenues for each agency in a manner that facilitates understanding and comparability among cities and counties about how the property tax funds municipal services. It should indicate the rates levied by special districts providing services commonly provided by a full service city such as parks and recreation services, library services,fire services in a way which compares them to those levied by a full service city and should portray allocations for redevelopment.county,and educational iurisdictions." The report will now be incorporated into legislation that is pending before a joint legislative Conference Committee on the issue: AB 1396-Villwaigosa. The Conference Committee has not yet held a meeting on the issue. 2 Meanwhile,the legislature is also gearing up for an intensive series of hearings on state and local government financing, led by Budget Conference Committee Chair, Senator Steve Peace. The additional Conferees include Senator Chuck Poochigian, Senator Don Perata, Assemblyman John Longville(Chair,Assembly Local Government), Assemblymember Dion Aroner,and Assemblyman George Runner. The hearings will commence on Tuesday, May 2 and will continue for several weeks. Senate President pro Tem,John Burton,has assigned his Chief of Staff,Diane Cummins,to organize and direct the Conference Committee. Ms Cummins has divided the first hearing to allow cities,counties,and special districts to testify in proportionate segments. CASA,AC WA, and CSDA have been asked to testify within the segment on special districts. We will keep you posted as to the developments of this group as well as the former Speaker's Conference Committee. IV. LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION REPORT On Wednesday,May 3, the Little Hoover Commission released its report on special districts. While the report contains some positive comments, i.e. special districts "provide important services to virtually every community in the State,"it will also present us with a number of challenges in the months to come. The report,which was based on a survey of more than 500 special districts,makes five significant recommendations. They are: I. The Governor and the Legislature should enact legislation that makes special districts more visible and accountable. 2. LAFCOs,by not being aggressive,have failed to promote the effective evolution of special districts—the State should provide LAFCO with direction and resources. 3. Equip policy makers with tools to guide organization of independent special districts—the Governor and the Legislature should establish a program at the California Policy Research Center or similar institute. 4. Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi-million dollar reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional or statewide infrastructure planning—the Governor and the Legislature should enact policies that will ensure prudent management of special district's reserve funds and incorporate these resources into regional and statewide infrastructure planning. 5. Policy makers should scrutinize the appropriateness of maintaining property tax allocations to enterprise special districts. The State Auditor should examine enterprise districts that receive property taxes and also have the highest reserves. The Legislature could then reduce or eliminate the property taxes with the possibility of counties reclaiming and reallocating the property tax revenues. 3 The report notes that"some reserves appear to be unreasonably large"and lists in chart form,the"top 25"districts with large reserves as a percentage of gross to retained earnings. Benefits and compensation to elected officials is also covered in the report with the notation that the majority of the special district elected officials receive less than $5,000 annually,with 78%of sanitary districts being in this category. On a positive note,the Commission report,in the section dealing with reserves, states, "Enterprise special districts play an important role in providing infrastructure to their communities. The issue is, given their financial resources,they could play an even larger role and whether they should ever turn to the State for financial help." Regarding special districts,the report notes "the vast majority we successful,"and"bigger is not always better." We will keep you informed as future developments occur. V. COMMISSION ON REORGANIZATION FOR 21"CENTURY As we reported at the August Conference and then again in January,the Commission on Governance for the 21"Century,known as the "Hertzberg Commission,"was formed to complete a"study of potential revisions to the laws that govem city, county and special district boundary changes (the local agency formation section of the Government Code, also known as the"Cortese Knox Act"). CASA monitored the activity of the Commission and had the opportunity to present testimony during one hearing in Fresno. The provisions of the study have now been incorporated in AB 2838 by Assemblyman Hertzberg,the new Speaker of the Assembly. While much of the bill deals with the areas of annexations, land use, and LAFCO independence, it does not appear to pose any major threats to special districts. In fact,one provision of the bill deals with"the reinforcement of the legitimacy of special districts,including representation on LAFCO's." The one concern of a few of our CASA agencies related to the"conducting authority"of special districts. Thanks to the efforts of Bob Reeb,ACWA lobbyist and former Assembly consultant,we were able to get a favorable compromise on this issue. In essence, if all goes well, language will be incorporated in the bill that provides when a petition for district annexation is filed with LAFCO,LAFCO will notify the affected agency's governing board,which will have a certain amount of time,e.g. 30 days,to adopt a resolution opposing the action, in effect, stopping it. If the agency does not exercise this authority, later in the process the agency can still adopt a resolution to which LAFCO has to give"great weight." VI. SENATOR POLANCO REQUESTS AN INTERIM HEARING ON BIOSOLIDS As an alternative to proceeding with his SB 1956, Senator Richard Polanco has requested that the Senate Environmental Quality Committee hold an interim hearing on biosolids land application. In a letter to Senator Byron Sher,Chair of the Committee, Senator Polanco noted that"the issue of proper management of biosolids is extremely important for the environment and for the infrastructure of the state"and"cannot be ignored or dismissed lightly." 4 Senator Polanco had introduced SB 1956 on behalf of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. The legislation was prompted by concern over the number of counties that have adopted,or are considering,bans or severe restrictions on land application. SB 1956 would have allowed local agencies to adopt ordinances regulating biosolids land application that are more stringent than federal and state requirements only where supported by sound science,and would have allowed interested parties to appeal local ordinances to the State Water Resources Control Board. CASA and the League of California Cities were in strong support of the measure. Opponents included the Sierra Club,AC WA,the agricultural community and a number of individual counties,all of which raised concerns about restricting local control. Given the controversy surrounding the bill, Senator Polanco and the sponsors decided not to proceed with SB 1956 this year. VH. MANDATORY PENALTY CLEAN-UP BILL STILL IN DEVELOPMENT Discussions with interested parties continue in an effort to draft clean-up legislation to ease the mandatory penalty burden on small communities and small business. SB 709, signed by the Governor last summer,imposes mandatory minimum penalties of$3,000 for specified violations of an NPDES permit. Many of the implementation issues have been resolved by interpretive guidance issued by the State Water Resources Control Board's Office of General Counsel. The legislation will focus on providing an exemption from mandatory penalties for entities discharging pursuant to a Cease and Desist Order or Time Schedule Order. The vehicle for the clean-up language will be SB 2165 by Senator Byron Sher, which is still in preliminary form pending the outcome of the working group discussions. VIII. BILL TO BAN LINDANE PASSES FIRST HURDLE AB 2318 by Assemblymember Alan Lowenthal would prohibit the use of lindane for the treatment of head lice and scabies,effective January 1,2002. CASA is supporting the bill and working closely with the author. The bill was approved by the Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials and now moves to the Appropriations Committee. Lindane shampoos and creams are rinsed off after use in the sink or shower, and make their way to the sewers. Lindane is not removed well in the wastewater treatment process,and passes through to downstream creeks, rivers and the ocean. Since a single treatment of lindane pollutes 6 million gallons of water,it is very difficult for POTWs to meet the freshwater standard of 19 parts per trillion. Not only is lindane highly toxic, but safer and more effective substitutes are widely available. At this time,AB 2318 is supported by POTWs,health organizations and the Sierra Club. There is no opposition to the bill. 5 IX. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AB 2799 by Assemblyman Kevin Shelley would allow,among other things, a court to order disclosure of documents without regard to whether the documents are protected from disclosure by a privilege. Current law recognizes that there are valid reasons to withhold documents, such as employee privacy,attorney-client privilege or deliberative process privilege. AB 2799 would allow a court to override these considerations and order disclosure. This would effectively nullify the public's right to claim these privileges. Moreover,because the payment of attorney's fees is mandatory under the Public Records Act,a public entity would be obligated to pay a plaintiffs attomy's fees even where a record was properly withheld, if the judge decides to override that decision pursuant to the bill. Ruthann Ziegler,one of our CASA attorneys on the Legislative Committee,volunteered to attend a meeting of the sponsors,the California Newspaper Publishers Association, and the First Amendment Coalition,and other opponents to the measures,and was effective in making key arguments as to why this would negatively impact local governmental agencies. Ultimately,before the policy committee,Assemblyman Shelley acknowledged problems with the bill,particularly the so-called"reverse balancing test" which he agreed to remove at the committee's request. In the end, the bill still did not have sufficient votes for passage and was granted reconsideration. Special thanks to Ruthann Ziegler for her assistance. X. DIRECTORS COMPENSATION Senator Dave Kelley, at the request of CASA, agreed to author legislation to increase directors compensation in an amount not to exceed 5%per year,since the last adjustment in 1986. Senator Kelley's measure, SB 1559, has passed the Senate and is awaiting hearing in the Assembly. XI. CHUCK CARRY ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT AS CHIEF ENGINEER AND GENERAL MANAGER OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY Charles"Chuck" Carry has been with the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County for 39 years, having served as a Chief Engineer and General Manager for the last 16 years. He will be succeeded by Jim Stahl, who most of you know has been Assistant Chief Engineer and Assistant General Manager since 1984. 6 Chuck graduated from Loyola University (which is now Loyola Marymount)with a Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering,and in 1961 received his Masters in Sanitary Engineering from the California Institute of Technology(Cal Tech). He has received many awards over the years,and last fall was inducted into the Loyola Marymount School of Engineering"Alumni Wall of Fame"for his professional achievements. Chuck has been active in CASA for many,many years,having served as Chair of the Legislative Committee,a member of the Executive Board, and he served as CASA's President in 1987. While Chuck's golf handicap may have been suspect at times,his hard work and dedication on behalf of CASA and the Sanitation Districts has never been questioned. You may recall that the Executive Board at the January meeting granted Chuck Carry honorary membership. We hope that he and Ginger will come back and visit us often. XIL LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY ATTACHED Attached is a list of the bills that have been reviewed,to date during the 1999-2000 Legislative Session,by the CASA Legislative Committee, chaired by First Vice President,Rich Luthy. 7 i local news ffiUe'FlikcrsfrclD P.aktaraian ..n� Company flushes plans for sludge site Filed: 05iO4/2000 By CHRISTINE BEFELL Caltfomian staff water e mail:cbedeII@bakemfiield.com The Yakima Co. has pulled the plug on plans to build a sludge- composting facility in western Kern County, ending a six-month public controversy. The company has decided to seek a "larger, more suitable" site in another jurisdiction, Yakima President Jim Willett said Thursday. Willett said he needs 1,000 acres, far more than the Kem site encompasses, better access to highways and a location farther away from incompatible development. The frigid response his project received from residents near the original spot — on 320 acres at 7th Standard Road and Magnolia Avenue northwest of Bakersfield—also affected the decision making, he said. . "Ideally, you'd like to be someplace where you're welcome as well," Willett said. "It's definitely not Magnolia and 7th Standard." The boards of at least three area srhnnl r istrirh had vntprt to oppose the Yakima project, also referred to as Valley Composting, Inc.: Maple School District; Wasco Union High School District; and Rio-Bravo Greeley Union School District. They feared the Class B biosolids to be processed—including a mix of treated human and industrial waste used as fertilizer on non-edible crops—would generate bad odors and flies and pollute the groundwater. The facility would have operated about six miles from Maple School. The school's buses would have traveled within a half-mile of it, raising additional concerns, said Lynn Joiner, administrative assistant to the Maple district superintendent. "It's encouraging that the efforts of so many people who would be affected (by Yakima's project) have been recognized," Joiner said. Yakima would have produced at the site "exceptional quality' biosolids —the only kind Kern County will allow on cropland effective 2003. It would have been capable of receiving 600,000 wet tons of organic waste, including 360,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids. The waste would have come from eight waste agencies, most of them in Southern California but also from the North of the River Sanitary District. Yakima's pullout won't affect North of the River much, officials there said. Yakima already applies Class B biosolids from those agencies on Kern County farms, about 200,000 wet tons a year. - It has operated here since 1994. Yakima began working to secure the composting facility in Kern County about a year ago. When the public started hearing about it six months ago, Yakima organized or spoke at numerous community meetings to explain its intentions. Company officials and supporters never mustered much community backing, however. Although he no longer wants to build in Kern County, Willett said he'd still like to locate somewhere in the San Joaquin Valley. Once Yakima completes construction and permitting —which he expects to take one year— it will move its land-application business out of Kern County as well, he said. This year, Yakima has applied about one-third of all biosolids applied in Kern County, according to the county Environmental Health Services Department. Last year it spread 24 percent of the total. Kern County Supervisor Ken Peterson, whose district would have housed the operation, was opposed to the project and called the relocation announcement good news. Even though Yakima would have produced the kind of material the county eventually wants applied, Peterson said he had to side with his very concerned constituents. "There could be a place to do this," Peterson said of the project's siting, "but this was the wrong place." m ® GGs W<k back W lop kome CoppgM W PI Th Bak fi IA G4M I P.[,lyhe w mbmJ er As da tl P C kl M' I Ptrraw Pollcv Statement Cpunty declares victory after sludge bill rescinded Page 1 of 3 NewWlats7 ?' V[✓1 news CIN Wakr Adis cdibrnimt County declares victory after sludge bill rescinded Filed: 04242000 By CHRISTINE BEDELL Californian staff'writer e-mail:cbedell@bakenfleld.a, Kem County officials declared a legislative victory Monday after a bill that could have blocked them from regulating sewage sludge was pulled from consideration by its author. State Sen. Richard Polanco, D-Los Angeles, asked that "interim hearings" first be held on his legislation so lawmakers can study it in greater detail. Such hearings are held, but referring a bill to one often is a way of killing it for that legislative session. Members of a large Kern County contingent that traveled to Sacramento Monday for the bill's first hearing, before the Environmental Quality Committee, declared victory. "All of our hard work paid off," said Kern County Counsel Bernard Barmann. Polanco's Senate Bill 1956 sought to prohibit local governments from enacting or enforcing biosolids ordinances more restrictive than federal and state standards except under limited circumstances. Sludge, or biosolids, is a mix of industrial and human waste used as fertilizer on non-edible crops. The Kern County Board of Supervisors, concerned about the material's environmental impacts, banned in October the land application of all but highly treated "exceptional quality" biosolids effective 2003. Several Southern California waste agencies that send sludge to Kem County, including those for the city of Los Angeles and the counties of http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--125550878Lasp 11 04/25/2000 County declares victory after sludge bill rescinded Page 2 of 3 Los Angeles and Orange, are suing Kem to set aside the ordinance. They backed Polanco's bill, which would have required that municipalities show the land application of sewage sludge "will result in unreasonable adverse effects on the environment or public health" before substantially restricting its use. In recent weeks,Kem County officials,farmers and others lobbied Environmental Quality Committee members in Sacramento against SB 1956. Several did so again Monday morning, including Barman, Grimmway Farms attorney Jeff Green,Jim Crettol, former president of the Kem County Farm Bureau, and grower Howard Frick. Polanco requested the pulling of his bill through a letter to committee Chairman Byron Sher, D-Palo Alto. While his legislation "appropriately addresses" the sludge issue,Polanco wrote, people have raised "many concerns" about it. "It is both a scientific and a political issue, and it is important we have the proper forum to discuss the matter in detail," Polanco wrote. Interim hearings are held after the end of the current legislative session and before the beginning of the next one, a period of a few months in the fall and winter. Such hearings sometimes are scheduled and held, but often they aren't and the bill dies. Mike Moore, manager of environmental compliance and monitoring for the Orange County Sanitation District, one of the agencies suing Kern County, said his agency supported Polanco's move. It's better that the bill be taken up after a statewide Environmental Impact Report on the use of sewage sludge is completed, he said. "The timing was just not right," Moore said. "We originally thought that the statewide EIR would have been certified by this time, and since it was not, we support the senator's decision to pull the bill." Californian reporter Vic Pollard contributed to this report. back baekft%p Iwrrla Copyhghl®20 ,The aakemtleld Calllomian I Emall the Webmasler A sedated Press Comnaht Notice I Pdh "PoMv Statement Sludge facility issue decided Page I of 2 news Mr lgah pm SaliI== .h.,,.. Sludge facility issue decided Filed: 0412712000 By CHRISTME BEDELL Californian staff writer email:cbedellCabakersfiekl.com Kem County has lost Round 1 of its fight to block permits for a sludge- composting facility near Bakersfield until a potential user takes over the project's environmental study. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research ruled this week that Kem County—not the Orange County Sanitation District—should be "lead agency" for The Yakima Co. project and see the studies through. But the ruling may not settle the issue. Kern County officials say that despite the decision, they will not immediately resume processing Yakima's plans. They want to wait until the court acts on separate but related lawsuits between Kern County and several sanitation agencies and companies, including Orange County Sanitation, over Kem's new sludge ordinance. Thomas Nixon,an attorney for Orange County Sanitation, said Kern's decision seems retaliatory. "It sounds like somebody's a little miffed over the separate litigation," Nixon said. The disputed facility would produce "exceptional quality" biosolids, also known as sewage sludge,on a 320-acre site north of 7th Standard Road and five miles east of Interstate 5. It's partly being built in anticipation of a Kem County ban on the cropland application of all but highly treated, "exceptional quality" biosolids.That goes into effect in 2003. The facility would be capable of receiving up to 600,000 wet tons of organic waste, including 360,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids. http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--I255250153.asp I 17) 04/28/2000 Sludge facility issue decided Page 2 of 2 Residents and school officials in the area have actively opposed the project, saying the material processed there could harm the environment. Kern County planners suspended processing of Yakima's permit applications in March, after teaming that Orange County contracted to supply Yakima with at least 100,000 wet tons of biosolids a year and had secured an option to purchase the site. Kern officials inferred that Orange County Sanitation District really was carrying out the project and so should be lead agency. Yakima, which says it has contracted to take biosolids from eight additional public agencies, asked the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to weigh in. It did. "(Kern County)has the greatest governmental authority and responsibility for approving the project," said Steven Nissen,acting office director. Kern County hasn't decided whether to appeal the ruling in Superior Court, said Deputy County Counsel James Thebeau. Kern might let the Tulare County courts resolve the matter as part of rival lawsuits being heard there over the appropriateness of Kern County's biosolids ordinance, he said. "One way or another, it's going to be a subject of court action," Thebeau said. The Yakima Co. also could turn to the courts if Kern County fails to process the composting facility permits,Nixon said. Nixon said he was "surprised" by Kern's position since the facility would produce the kind of material Kern says it wants applied here. Jim Willett, president of The Yakima Co., said he hadn't heard about Kern County's unwillingness to proceed with permitting and so he hasn't yet weighed his legal options. "We'll have to huddle on that, I guess," Willett said. ® ® 4 back back b top home CopYtl9hM 2000,ma eekers0eltl Cellfornlen 1 Email the➢ oMagl1pr ALS9giated I[Py1rlvacv Policv Statement 1 b,..•//•..•.•. 6..Lemr:eld �.....N..../:_ 1 OGMGl11 G'! ..e ��•�" ���� Ashburn takes sludge fight to Assembly Page 1 of 2 \\�� i ti ► 4 � le'7 � news II[bc Baketatiem d.'alitomten Ashburn takes sludge fight to Assembly Filed: 05IV312000 By CHRISTINE BEDELL Californian staff writer e-mail:cbedeBCPbakersfield.corn An Assembly committee on Wednesday took a"first step"toward assuring Kern County's right to regulate the spreading of sewage-sludge within its borders. The Committee on Local Government unanimously approved legislation blocking government agencies doing business in other jurisdictions from overriding the policies of the host jurisdiction. Assemblyman Roy Ashburn,R-Bakersfield,wrote the bill at the request of the Kern County Board of Supervisors. The supervisors hope the legislation will help stave off attacks by several Southern California waste generators and handlers opposed to the county's new sludge ordinance. The ordinance, which will ban the land application of all but "exceptional quality" biosolids effective in 2003, is the subject of a lawsuit in Tulare County Superior Court. Wednesday's hearing was the first test for Assembly Bill 2495. "This is a great victory, and a first step toward increased local control where the law's been uncertain," said County Counsel Bernard Barmann, one of several local officials who went to Sacramento for the hearing. The one-sentence legislation would extend far beyond the regulation of land-applied sludge used as fertilizer on nonedible crops. It would block governments from claiming immunity from all sorts of building, zoning and health and safety regulations i http://www.bakersfi'eld.com/top/i--1254730788.asp h 05/04/2000 Ashburn takes sludge fight to Assembly Page 2 of 2 Ashburn's legislation would close a loophole created by an attorney general's legal opinion issued in the 1960s. Some members of the committee represent areas of Southern California that export biosolids to Kern County,but Ashburn said no one spoke in opposition to AB 2495. The Los Angeles and[range county boards of supervisors, two of the entities suing to set aside Kern County's sludge ordinance, have not taken formal positions on the bill. Since it would not impact the state budget,the measure probably will go directly to the Assembly floor for consideration,Ashburn said. The lawmaker said he's not sure what kind of reception it will receive. "Because one aspect of it involves the disposal of sewage sludge by Orange and Los Angeles counties in Kern County and other areas ... there are big players that might have an interest in it," Ashburn said. "At some point, we'll hear from them." ® 0 back backte Wp baps CoWght02000,The 9akers0ekl Q411omlen I Emer the Webmaster AssodateE Press CeMAght Notice I P eev P.11 &awment httn://www.bakersfield.com/too/i--1254730788.asn nsrnar)nnn 2"D ANNUAL SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED PLANNING MEETING For further information: Lindell L.Marsh 949-752-1538; email: Imarsh®worldnet.attnet THURSDAY-FRIDAY,JUNE 1-2,2000 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 222 N. VINEYARD AVENUE, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91765 A One and one-half day coming-together of local, state and federal agencies and interests to address the future of the Santa Ana River Watershed Sponsored by: the Urban Water Institute, the Growth Management Institute and the Santa Ana River Watershed Group,with financial support from the Orange County Water and Sanitation Districts and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency Thursday afternoon: small group sessions Thursday evening dinner: Mary Jane Forster, State Water Board Member to address: "An Urbanizing Watershed of National Signiftcance" Friday: plenary sessions The Meeting is open to the interested public and will provide local and regional leaders with a chance to learn about the area's potential and to be involved in planning for its future. REGISTRATION FORMS ARE ATTACHED. WHY THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED? • The Largest river is Southern California draining to the Pacific Ocean • The fastest growing watershed in the nation (4.7 to 6.8 people in 2020) • The two largest groundwater basins in Southern California available for conjunctive use • The largest freshwater wetlands in Southern California; the most important stop in Southern California on the Pacific Flyway • Responsible for one-fifth of the State's economic production • Elects one-sixth of the State Legislation and 11 members of Congress An economic and political powerhouse TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED include: water quality and supply; land use development, transition and conservation; the future of the Chino Basin; the Chino Basin Organics Center; and partnerships in the watershed. See the following conference program. THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2000 SMALL GROUP PLANNING SESSIONS 1:00 p.m.: REGISTRATION 1:30 p.m.: SMALL GROUP SESSIONS Purpose of the Small Group Sessions is to review and refine the program elements, involving local,state and federal agencies and interests, as well as experts for presentation to the plenary sessions on Friday. A. Chino Basin Organics Center(part of a national network of centers) Discussion Leaders:Richard Atwater,General Manager,Inland Empire Utilities Agency; Robert Feenstra,Executive Director,Milk Producers Council B. Conservation and Transition Planning Discussion Leaders:Jerry Blum,City Planner,City of Ontario; (Invited) Charles Coe,Director, Community Development,City of Chino C. Water Supply and Quality Discussion Leaders: William Mills,General Manager,Orange County Water District;Jerry Thibeault,Executive Officer,Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region;Joe Grindstaff, General Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Project —Authority; Traci Stewart,Chief of Watermaster Services, Chino Basin Watermaster D. Watershed Agenda/Partnerships Discussion Leaders: Ronald Loveridge,Mayor,City of Riverside; Lindell Marsh,Facilitator/Counsel, Santa Ana River Watershed Group 6:30 p.m.Dinner--Celebrating the Grove Avenue Basin and Dairy Pilot Washwater Project. Speaker: Mary Jane Forster,Member, California Water Resources Control Board "Urbanizing Watersheds of National Significance" JUNE 2- PLENARY SESSION 7:30 a.m. Richard Atwater,General Manager Registration-Continental Breakfast Inland Empire Utilities Agency 8:30 a.m. Robert permits,Executive Director Welcome Milk Producers Council Wayne Clark,Executive Director Urban Water Institute,Inc. Response and Discussion: Blake Anderson,Co-Chair Santa Ana River Watershed Group Jeff Vonk,National Resources General Manager Conservation Orange County Sanitation District United States Department of Agriculture 9:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED,A Break CHALLENGED WATERSHED:THE ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR,LOCAL, 11:15 a.m STATE,FEDERAL PARTNERSHIPS THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY REPORT FROM THE WATERSHED AGENDA/PARTNERSHIPS GROUP REPORT FROM THE WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY GROUP Ron Loveridge,Mayor City of Riverside William Mills.General Manager Orange County Water District Lindell Marsh,Facilitator/Counsel Santa Ana River Watershed Group Jerry Thibeault,General Manager Water Quality Control Board, Response and Discussion: Santa Ana Region Philip Oshida,Chief Joe GrindstaH,General Manager Wetlands Strategies and State Programs Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority U.S.Environmental Protection Agency • Traci Stewart,Chief of Watermaster • Maria Rea,Assistant Secretary, Services,Chino Basin Watermester Watersheds and Salmon Restoration California Resources Agency Response and Discussion: • Dan Young,Assc Chief,Planning Bob Joe,Executive Legislative Manager U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Burnell Cavender,General Manager San Bernardino Valley Water Mary Jane Forster,Board Member Conservation District State Water Resources Control Board Bob Fisher,Executive Director Steve Kasower.Regional Planning Officer Friends of Orange County Harbors, U.S.Bureau of Reclamation,Southern Calif. Beaches and Parks 12 noon Luncheon 10:00 a.m. Break 1:00 p.m A VISION FOR THE SMART GROWTH OF 10:15 a.m. THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED CHINO BASIN ORGANICS MANAGEMENT CENTER:PART OF A Clayton Record,Director NATIONAL NETWORK OF CENTERS: Eastern Municipal Water District OPPORTUNITIES;CONCEPT,STRATEGY Metropolitan Water District of So.Calif. AND IMPLEMENTATION Supervisor John Tavaglione,Second REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL District,Riverside County(invited) ORGANICS CENTER GROUP Supervisor Charles Smith,First District Kenneth Coresio,Managing Director Orange County(invited) O'Connor and Company,Securities 3:00 p.m. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE:THE 1:30 p.m. SANTA ANA WATERSHED GROUP Break Blake Anderson,General Manager 2:00 p.m. Orange County Sanitation District CHINO BASIN CONSERVATION AND TRANSITION PLANNING Lindell Marsh,Esq.,Consultant, Siemon,Larsen&Marsh REPORT FROM THE CONSERVATION AND TRANSITION GROUP Robert Feenstra,Executive Director Milk Producers Council Jerry Blum,City Planner City of Ontario 3:30 p.m. Adjourn Charles Coe Director of Community Development City of Chino Response and Discussion: • John Withers,Governmental Relations Lewis Homes • Dan Silver,Coordinator Endangered Habitats League Program and Registration Information REGISTRATION DEADLINE-MAY 26,2000 Complete the form below and mail your check,credit card(Visa and Master Card)authorization or purchase order(payable to the Urban Water Institute)to the Urban Water Institute,3 Civic Plaza,Suite#100,Newport Beach CA 92660,fax to 949/760-6073. Space is limited and will not be held without advance payment.Registration after May 26will be accepted by fax only with advance credit card payment on a space available basis. An additional charge of$25 will apply to registrations at the door. Call in advance to determine whether space is available. LOCATION AND LODGING Site of the program is the DoubleTree Hotel,222 N.Vineyard Avenue,Ontario CA 91765.Hotel overnight reservations must be made directly with the hotel by calling 909/937-0900.Be sure to mention that you are attending the Urban Water/Santa Ana River Watershed Group, 2nd Annual Planning Meeting.Government rates apply. CONFERENCE INFORMATION URBAN WATER INSTITUTE,INC.,3 Civic Plaza,Suite 100,Newport Beach CA 92660 Tel. 949/760.6071,FAX 949/760-6073,E-mail urbanwaterl 0aol.com (tax ID#33-0578523) REGISTRATION INFORMATION Registration includes continental breakfast and luncheon,and information packets. Visa and Master Cards accepted.No registration held without full payment. An additional charge of$35 is required for dinner on Thursday evening,June 1. CANCELLATION POLICY Cancellations must be received in writing by May 26. (Faxes accepted).Enrollment fees will be returned, less a$25 administrative charge. No refunds will be granted after May 26.No-shows will be invoiced. Substitutes are acceptable.The Institute reserves the right to cancel any program,to substitute announced speakers and assumes no responsibility for personal expenses. Please tear off said mail to the Urban Water Institute,Inc. 0 YES.Register the following person for the Second Annual Santa Am River Watershed Planning Meeting, Double Trec Hotel,Ontario. 0 Conference Registration:$12-1 0 Emeritus,academic and student registration,$50.(with proof) C 3 Dinner,Thursday evening.June I:$35 Check Enclosed$ or P.O.R for invoice Credit Card a 0 Vtm,0 Master Card Expiration Date: Signature Name: —'title Agency/Firm Telephone( ) Address FAX( ) City State_ Zip Code e-mail address Make hotel reservations directly with hotel at(909)937-0900.Call early for limited government rotes. Use photo copies for each additional registration. CATEMP\PLANNING MEETING SUMMARY.doc Foocv400 RanoF counT Y 15 -� WATER FUTURE Vol. 1, No.4 =r, , e )l Spring 1 J PINANC, PARrNeRS For Orange County, County of Orange Water is the Constant in an Era of Change Municipal Water District of Orange County ater ploys a central mle in Orange daa,while the ccinferencc theme.`looking Metropolitan Cmunh11 pact,present,and—quite Fomarl Together:\foster and Orange Count%s 11.1,District of certaink—future.That message,among others. Future."pnnided a unifiing note. southern California came through loud and clear for the nude 150 Orange County attendees at the first Orange County Water The Past Is Prologue Rater Di tics Conference on October 29. 1999 at the Beckman Conference attendees listened to a presents- Orange County Center in Inine.California. lion on the importance of water in Orange Sanitation District Just as important was a consensus among the Cnnnh's past firma Mrs.Jmm Inine Smith,who is City of.Anaheim speakers and the participants that Orange Counh amsidered to Ira"the first lade of water in Orange civic,business,and water industry leaders need to Courac"For Mrs. Smith,looking into the future City of Santa Ana better caardinate their projects,programs•and requires understanding the past. C.S.Rurrou approaches to regional,state,and federal regda- Mrs.Smith were together the histon.of water Of Reclamation furs•administrators.and political leaders. development and management in Orange Counh• National Thee conference—the first of its kind in Orange with the histon of her,mu fiumhl who founded Rater Research Comm —served as a the]nine Ranch more Institute fitting enhnination of thorn a century ago. Coa riat Municipal the first rear of"Focus Front the IM. to the stater District on Orange Counh•'s '91'hen l tea..Initing up. I slienl my srhtsd 19%,droughts and City of Fullerton \Passer Future."The raralian.I kiling nut grandfather al the Ranch. narcls punctuated ents Ain. o, ,all goal of-Focus" ruin 1 eery nffen accompanied lit,,, in hoop rl his of agricultural cl rvlop- Rater Management is to integrate technical it-tiler system, u.hidr included the urlls.the turns in Cringe Count) Agency information from multi- irrigalion lines.she dihdtex.and she elan'.. And,since the 19U, South last Regional ple crater planning the need to secure an Re Iturin oo projects into a regional Fnnn rhildhoml. This rrin rirun•drrphl iuynrssrd adequate and reliable Authority picture of current mud upon nu•that no problem m,mhadaired the water supply has been firhtre water demands. Ranh nunr than the snplrly of uvrlen.. pivotal to Orange water supple options• Countr's residential and mid water gtalih,chal- — 1hu.Jorc On nr Srn'rm connnrec al develop- lenges for Orange _ ment.helping to make it Cuunh'. In keeping with raw of the must drratmic those goals,the conference brought together economics in the world. people of dire it interests to disc iss water issues For Mrs.Smith's hnnilr.:w well as for the entire that then have in common. Both the audience:cod comnh,securing an adetloate water supply and speakers included individuals fmm academia, assuring its qualih'and reliability h:we been essenfi:d business.mid local and state ginemntent as well to gnnvih and the qualih'of life in Orange Counh'. as from water agencies at the local. regional state. Therefore•in order m>mmiamn these standards. and national levels. we raced to Ice tnur• Farsi0aml in the development Thee purpose of the conference eras to prmide, of mew technologies for waaer quahh Implore- share.and reflect upon information about the stem,the attention to mnsen:miom mud the importance of water to Orange Cmunh'as a protection of cmimnmcnl:d surroundings. whole. Mann perspeclires on that topic fulled the Cnnllnned on Pmr•2 r f` Conelnuerlfmm Page 1 b"'r, "Meeting the ever-growing demand for water,protecting it,and replenishing s ;y depleted supplies are very formidable and n expensive challenges;'concluded Mrs. f Smith."We can reasonably expect another S - 18 million people to call California home by the year 2025,and we can reasonably expect most of the population increase to S take place in Southern California. Now is a time to take a very hard look at reality." j Water's Role in r/{ Orange County Today Moderated by Stan Sprague,General Manager of the Municipal Water Distict of Rnnalrl Linsk�.National 1Vatm Ha,vnrch hrrtinrte(\'ll itil. Orange Cmmht a four-person panel and Al..Joan Irvine Smith,NIVRI founder. discussed the current relationship between water and business, [Dent government. Santa Ana River Mainstem Project,which is a and the environment in Orange County. series of improvements to Rood control,to water Robert Bein,Chairman of the Infrastructure conservation,and to the river channel facilities in Committee of the Orange County Business Orange County and upstream.In addition,she Council, posed a series of questions regarding aim)noted the county's initiative as lead local .. business and economic development:"Is there a agency in partnership with the U.S.Army Corps relationship between agriculture and water?is of Engineers on planning studies of Orange there it relationship between high-tech County watersheds, including Aliso Creek,San production end water?Is there it relationship be. Diego Creek,and San Juan Creek, hveen the wastewater Janet Huston, Execu- dis,llart o•and the water live Director for the supph?Is there a relation- ^I believe lit,,biggest stakeholder., Orange County Division ship wn%een residential development and water? —Ihose icho have the most to lose— of the League of California Is them a relationship not,the husine,s rnnunnnit/in Cities,noted that while most cities and towns in pall, •cu r¢'rter?I and (b,mgv<:ount/." Orange depend on pal and water'?Is them a K IY 1 ,t I I nrhip lwt veen —Rumari' lbam water districts and regional hmri.m and mate'?Ifthe Rvxhlrul. IiRP v.%marinles agencies to assure their uisVr 1'11 q(, to am,of ,a,/Cmiram it nflhr lnfpplmrrov Ceason,,' residentswater and Ihm, it makes it real eat' rf the Orvmge County Rosiness Coetril wastewater services,there u,s, win wc, all should is growing recognition " 'J" dims time vvorking — among municipal officials mi t6, i.me of miner. Because the economy of that fisr-away changes conceming the Delta in (hvncr C...mh is d,'pendent on these Northern California or the Colorado River iuduair.." watershed are relevant to Orange Countys water M, 15,•ni added that further improvements to future. She added that the coordination of th, r hwhilih it quality,of the water supply in services provided Itv,vater and sanitation Ormw, Cumdw ore critical to maintaining districts with the services provided by economic pnnperih'. For instance,he knew of at municipalities and the county is essential to least three businesses that bad hesitated over assuring development that achieves the high [twitting in Orange Court'because of concems expectations of living in Orange Couny. about the adequach,and reliability of Orange Ms. Huston also stated that several munici- CuunKs water supply. polities along Orange County's boundary with Janice Mitenmeier.County Executive Officer I.os Angeles Count'—from Brea to Seal Beach for the County of Orange,emphasized the —lave become actively Involved in the forms- importance of outer in the coon rls efforts to tion of at new conservancy district for the San plan cooperatively with local governments and Gabriel River watershed,The California legisla- the business community in accommodating tore established the conservancy'in 1999,and development while maintaining high quality of Orange Count•municipalities orguniwd to life. She highlighted the county's work on the assure two seats on the conservancy hoard.The o_ conseimum rill damlop a plan for consc•nrdion Colorado River to the South6md.Including and restoration of open space and deal with Orange Couutf. srateished mfmkgnnent issues along the Still Due to cb:ntges in State:nfl federal legislation Gil)d,l Ricer and its tributaries that afkTt as well;is rcgulatnlr Iwlicirs.:uul in respnnso to Onow,Claim,% cltauges being rerplestetl be its weuiber gGeneicc Thoth, Brick a director in the Board of the throughout Suuthem Cnlifi nlia, \I\\'D rees:uu- Metropolitan Water District of Southent ined both its role and its gocenuuur and mun- Califontia(A'I\\'D), noted that one cannot talk agement structures dining IOJO. Bur instance. about water arthout talking about the emimn- \I\YD's hoard of disc tom is decreasing in size meat. tie said Ihat."\1'e lurce to de%elnp u,;d(-r from ail memIteis to IS, If.addition, \I\\'1) burs resources in a%c;m that been rcorgaidwil intent- loiII111117RS danr,prz•to alk.from 10 dhisions the natrnal dmcn to three,which emirouwent."Portlier- -Th, waterways of Orange Counbl an•ml tic+u on die care finxilous non•.he fnuph:uslaxl hulmornit asperl ofourgaalLry ,J'li/i% of water system opero that.%%hrne%x•r pasihlr. and we Irani In be,,'fire parlleipo...1, tiow'.Water vvquisition wr need to[Ind W;ms to in ensaming Iheir Irrll-Lring." and mammew, it,and combine water don,- mppun n 1, (Drool eRurt+witL J s\Ice: \In II I uu'ara;. (oanly liner.,It, 061 rr. (',not// (Urn r„e \u ha to\II. eumm�nsntal C.a I III I.a. \I\\1) protection grstls. loulo ahead to Ih, linln'e Mn Brick also stated of Soot hen, California that the mnneei ions Ia-h%cca rode,domlupmew \Cartel supplies. secwul imPorl:sot te.wsilions arc fall emimnmental protoctiou :m. no%f more nn the horizon: apparent to lbe Water furl ln.....it, It became • Quantifying and sertu iu;;%Ill Dh allocation clear.se%en l rrov:e_I thud %%:der m:fw�,,emrnt ofCololvaln Rir,, .e,,pou,. "rhi,process \flat](]hare w'hill m o, I'I'no. 'nap .,tifq w.ire wvplires not unl\cmo Ill,, ninth-Male and mole v';dcl't..f led de%,In nuel,I undo.uud negohatiouS, hot also iaha-sLde ue"oliatiof9 leluusntucborlilac orrrtb,."'iqument of Caffi,ruias Shure. Iron.Irolannatiun.:oat .wr.I_r- w nopm IL,IIs,' ho ,,j.or,lim;tic• C:ILTED prylem In and rouse nl'rfistiu¢.nppli, .. \t I I h IlnIt d ,11, u„ iugnrrr uvuer quality and rnrtrmunental rrcrn;nizvd Ihal 1111dreti1r;I.1,.d o.11, r n ­Inros prow,1iou in the S,arnuu'alo-Son Joaquin —,Iola:u riy,rs nod .tr.:I nlnuh%ate r Dell". TLi,pc roe w ss- Ili, bur tal:en In ngel' haVIln.. and with... - i.n L� % In iwl....... g ad prodneed I. ..corm,...... th:ol Luprd. %odor n li:ah1111% :Ind �pr.dlh ill nor ngion. o a."II o...jol lc "thin."%uhi,o It , the lots ul'a huile golf'hk a "A'r. \x o restd" there The hater Indn8lry ►n 711vtnsitiml will probabh Iit 'until calb ins of %%:der resource pl,umiop ad n .n ,,onwl in the 'I I" ondve, dim d I 'p,Aem. Sonthl:md In dread, . lu rune. Th,' lied Was Iron:Ili] (;.LIB I..... .d \I m v-1, • IrnplrmrWho, .3111'D'x bargraled Resourres 0M\\'1).Who "It...1,.1 nli lh, 1. itl, Plan Thiscl lot'I imuh o.elueor(vur(linatinn alfocllnq tbe(li.ahi(L Lich plmnL uoporl,', ol'I„o:d %can,'n:anm'ce.%dlll imported ,,a(,-, ImIllboth Sinlhiuv t '..dd...... ,old l he supplies uud ioereused n., of storage mpacit, ;lad.nose..thou to 11P1wrt reli.nhibl% w ithin Ibe h;%en rue nl Ibe...demlolr of al.iuvd%,> nrgaliuliuu. ruurdilunlli w.:md cuulitinu w\ bl Iildim,'I'n Ili y.nceossf ll In 51't'i l l'l l lg ill, I',jinn I c anoe \� lidnre. Oraucrol'.if,1, r e un III:uI sunnd 1rrIlir;d _ nr.,(Iuurit,to snpp i,t wv _ 1 plans.\\ It d Ill, Ili, •'I ra:J and r nilcdca 011" (% lo.Igtpnt Ira Il'artstl /rnlheax of Ili,panel im Ita i0ionlepl Janrl i bwnu.moire Will rrnn,if,: rejoin a rogion:d %iaion :Ind liolxui Ikin.TnI...My Rr Irk.aarl.titan S'prm ne. Coolioard nn P J _3_ C.nttnued fmrn Page 3 �n s regional cooperation."In the final analysis. B no one entity can do it all," Mr.Gastelum ,r+cf Y'lls concluded."We need to come together." The second keynote speaker was George Campbell,a member of the Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Water I Conservancy District(which operates the 1 i' Central Arizona Project)and of the Colorado River Water Users Association Mr.Campbell regaled the audience with a trde both humorous and cautionary,abort the changing priorities and policies govern- ing water resources in the Southaestem _ United States. Although Arizona,in some wars, George Campbell,Cenevel Arizona Water Conservancy,and competes with California when it comes to Don Alartinson,San Juan Basin Authority, the allocation of Colorado River Neater, Mr. Campbell observed that Arizona has its own than rely on the promised flow of Central concems. Arizona now has the physical capacity Arizona Project(CAP)water.Southern California to receive its total allocation of 1.5 million acre- communities mar also need to respond to changes heel per year from the Colorado River-that is, in the management of water from the Delta and indeed,one of the reasons why California has the allocation of water from the Colorado,and been under increased pressure to reduce its find alternative means of shoring up the relia- , ^ bility and quality of their water supplies. yt annual take-6u[the allocation of that water y h' pp . - within Arizona has undergone dramatic changes. Raymond Hart,Deputy Director of the Call- The1980 division of Arizona's water from the fomia Department of Water Resources,rein- kT' Central Arizona Pmject for urban(municipal and forced the messages of both keynote speakers by t r . industrial),agri- providing infortme ,w cultural,and Indian turn about the p, M tribe usage has been status of the E __ revised by the Interior CALFED negotia- - 'By cbYta•of die esMnsion of muter and ae¢er.wecicev, times.Depa urreent several buns regarding the •� times.Currently,half nuuul.err r mm�umitien ore being hilt,aornetina°v Delta region.A g��g�. of Arizona's allocation oith I danaghi try,hi it-lit) aril pr.rede polire verrices, report is due in m� ,, —'- of Coloado liver left. roll pu oride the brae pmYatmn sercaev. A better June 2000 and, water has been shift- coordination of those the full range of services—that although it will not ed to tribal and emi- .development ueould offer acould be helpfud to the he final,it will be mninent.d usageand continued viability.fOrange Counly in the longem," instructive about +e^ away,from municipal the options con- and industrial usage. j%XET Ht vT(A, cerning the Delta This shift has the Evocative Director, and the potential League of Cali,(naia Cities,O"age Ginty Division potential serious ro create Califefiveornia Southern serious difficulties Cali( mu Califor- y k $ within the state, nia is also a key . where the growth in water demand is almost participant in the Colorado River negotiations, entirely for urban usage. which could reduce—but make more certain— w" Mr.Campbell's story carried two important the state's share in the river's Row. In addition, lessons.First,fit this time of transition,even the Department of Water Resources will develop y'yy- jo arrangements once thought to be sound and the latest update of the California Water Plan, unchanging can shift with new times and new, which will provide projections of total water priorities. Secrond,the challenges that Arizona's supply and demand as well as identffy am - -,a metropolitan areas are facing may be faced deficits in average or dry-year supplies for each a•' d' ' elsewhere in the U.S.Arizona's cities and towns region of the state. e ' will now have to pay greater attention to capturing and staring surplus water when it is State-of-the-Art on Display available.They will also have to rely on other Santa Am River Supplies self-sufficiency options,such as reclamation and Several conference presenters provided conservation,to meet growing demands rather updates on the latest deyelnpments in watershed le -4- management,water conservation,water transfers, just upstream from Prado Data,has negatively and desalination as they affect—or might affect affected Orange County's water supply for many —Orange County years now.Through Orange County's participa- 1Aglliam Mills,General Manager of the Orange tion on the Santa Ana Watershed Project County Water District,discussed the vital role Authority—and with vital regulatory help from that the Santa Ana River plays in Orange County's the Regional Water Quality Control Board— water supplies.The river provides 60 percent of serious efforts are now being made to address the water that is re- and remediate the charged into the Orange contamination problems County groundwater "A lot of enrirmunnuulists would say That generated by the tons of basin,which is the wul'e not loin"cnnugh in terms of water dairy waste deposited in Primary drinking water - the Chino Basin since source for most of rnneercalinn nn(I rrrlmm�limr and water reamn'crs. But uric.loin„nun..than anyone the 1900s. county's population. J Therefore,developments else iu the country. 11 a r III .la more,and we Water Use Efciermy throughout the Santa will(In more in III(fimor... li'e enn plraect in Orange County Ana River+vatershed— the encirnnmeul nn.l provide the water to feed Edward Agbjayan, including events that that econonul cord prnlect Nw lifestyle to General Manager of the take place far upstream, City of Anaheim Public from orange which we're all become accustomed." Utilities,provided an Count)•—have impacts -Timuntiv BNCA, update on die Water Use upon the supply,quality, f ERiciev Steering Bn(ll'(10 DIlCeI01'M. nc hi and rest of water in ,tle6'opolintu Wat" Dielrict of Southern California Committee"efforts to Orange County. support and expand water The allocation of _ conservation in Orange water between the lower(Orange County)and County.The committee is composed of rcpresen- upper(Riverside and San Bernardino counties) tath2s from cities and water districts in die county, areas of the Santa Ana River watershed bas been including Orange County Water District, governed by a court judgment among water Municipal Water District of Orange County.and agencies since 1969. Recent changes in the Orange County Sanitation District. Its principal upper area—increased Bows from treated purpose is to develop a multi-agency approach to wastewater discharges as the area urbanizes and water conservation,such as creating joint studies the completion of Seven Oaks Dam—have or using combined purchasing power to get better stimulated reconsideration of the allocation of deals on retrofit equipment and the like. rights to water Rows. Some of this activity has The committee is composing it White Paper found its way to the State Water Resources on Water Use Efficiency in Control Board in the form of new applications Orange County for publica- for water rights. tion.The committee is advo- '- A cooperative agreement has been reached eating for local agencies to between the Orange County Water District and enter the California Urban the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Water Conservation Council District to alleviate a high groundwater table in Memorandum of Under- San Bernardino by pumping water out and standing,which outlines 14 sending it down the river to Orange County.This water conservation measures agreement began with a transfer of 10,000 as Best Management Practices acre-feet this rear and may increase to as nine], (BMPs).The committee is as 25,000 acre-feet next Year and beyond. now trying to get the 30 water Mr. Mills also described some of the bene6- agencies in the county to sign vial effects of the Santa Ana River Madnstmn on to these BMPIV 13 have Project,which includes enlargement of Prado already done ur. Dam as well as the reservoir and wetlands areas Mr.Aghjayan translated the behind it.These improvements will inerease the concept of"water conserva- amount of storm flow that can be gathered tion"into a"water supply"for behind the dam for controlled release into Orange County using the example of the Willis.Mills, Orange County,allowing mare of the local Steering Committee's most ambitious program to Orange County resource to be captured in the Orange County date.l7irough the action of Use committees Water District. basin and used,and less to be lost to the ocean. member agencies,55,000 toilets per year for 5 Water quality degradation in the upper area of years—275,000 total—will be replaced in the watershed.especially in the Chino Basin area Continued oil Page 6 -5- Continued from Page 5 For water transfers to become a significant Orange County with free,ultra low Rush models. component of water resource management in The resulting water savings would free up enough California,a multitude of institutional and policy water to supply 20,000 additional Orange County considerations must be addressed including: households. s Protecting the communities in the area-of- orfgfn of a water transfer. Water Tmrufere s Ensuring that opportunities to use transfers to Matthew Stone,Associate General Manager take advantage of inexpensive water when it is of the Municipal Water District of Orange County, available do not displace water agencies' followed with an update on water transfers. maintenance of effort in conservation, Water transfers—or,exchanges or sales of water reclamation,and desalination programs. or water rights among those who have them and ♦ Water rights implications and complications, those who want or need them—are part of an such as how,those who obtain rights to water integrated resources planning approach(as through transfers,have adequate assurance contrasted with a more traditional,dam-and- that they will actually be able to retrieve and divert approach). Mr. Stone emphasized that use it. transfers are likely to • Variations in water he needed in addition quality,which affect to all of the efforts the usability of a described by the other water supply for the u r presenters, '9 want to congratulate you rah this conference. purposes intended by succhh as a - such storage, It's ualliImportantm someone opportunity fa ,take sure that someone who conservation.reclama- Orange Counly continues to he at the table on acquired it. than,etc. the aaja'decisions that we're about to make s Water"wheeling" Water touters could here fit California and certainly of the arrangements—or, be especialh'useful and Metropolitan Water District. Change is here, how water is physi- appnprriale fur Sonthem clange is fry the air; Metropolitan is going to be °ally moved from the seller's location to the California because ready,and I sense that Orange County is going buverc—will have to largr-eapacih convey- to be ready, tor." be worked out in :nee p"Mc.Such as, order for the water the California A ue- —RoNATM CAST LVM, I market in California duct and Ibc Colorado Cencml Manager, to really open up Riser Aqueduct, could Atef epolitan Water District of'Sonf cirri California beyond local basin by used m gti water borders. Mr. Stone front Inc:aions adjacent mentioned that the to thing pmlc(N And,wdthin Sodhem Cali- California legislature carried over brain 1999 it fornia t tr;war Counh'is particularly well suited hill—S.B.506—intended to address issues of to tu6, :a l.:u a:w_•of slater transfers.The counh hov the owners and operators of water camec- has cud, con rand storage ellpacity,which is ance facilities should be compensated for use y:Juabb in 1111 water transfer arena because of their facilities,and on what terns thev w:uer i.ohrup, 't to acquire when it is the most should have to make those facilities available pleutibil.Tho eomuumities that can take greatest for conveyance of water by others. adcan�mi ..I v.itor hans(ers will be the ones[hat Ocean and Brackish Desalination cxu argoirr ILr w�drr when it is nsdlable and inexpensisv and store it somewhere until it is Ronald Unsky, Director of the National most needed. Water Research Institute,discussed the latest deselopments in desalination. Progress in the implementation of desalina- than has been much greater in the Middle East and in island nations than in California. Never- theless,improvenhents fit the technology and More then r„p economics of desalination have significmt 160 attended it for widening its potential here. tlw conference, i'• ' represenKng During the 1990s,the production of reverse bastnc.sea. osmosis membranes used in a desalination plant cities,end lutes improved.The frequency with which water Infematr membranes have to be replaced has decreased, throughout and so has the amount of pressure required to Orange fnunfy farce water through the membranes.In addition, —6— the actual membrane cost has dropped from communities of interest to _— approximately$1,000 to about$200 per reverse communicate with their state. osmosis element. level policy makers. But in addition to—and. Mn Linsky empha- Itis essential,said Assembly, sized,just as important as—de advances that arm Ackerman,that people in A have reduced the costs of membranes,there Orange County pay attention 4 •- have been innovations in the financing and not only to local concerns,but management of desalination facilities. lie told also to statewide matters. j:... the story of the development of the neu, Failure to do so can lead to desalination facility that will supply the Tampa unwanted state policies or to Bay area of Florida.There,a private contractor missed opportunities for state is building the facility and selling the water to assistance. He also eneaur- the city water utility at a guaranteed price per aged the attendees to pw gallon—a process known as Build Own, attention to matters that aim Operate,and Transfer(BOOT).The Tampa not mention the word water" project allowed the contractor to lower its costs but,nevertheless,are closely of raising capital by taking advantage of tax- related.As an example,he discussed the Professor William exempt financing.The combination of financing legislative and gubernatorial hsftiadws currently Blomgrdst is :and management innovations has the price of being promoted to support"infrastructure" Chair of the desaltedl outer for Tampa dance NWBI Knowledge to about 5560 improvements. Since water supply,wastewater Managemna per acre-foot,which,in Southern California. treatment,Laid so on are parts of the states infra- Comminee and would make it a very competitive option. structure,local communities need to think about serves oa fruit!. Although most people Larry think of the paten- lace`'to cormnuticate their infrastructure needs tatorfor 4Toom tia l for desalination in terms of coastal communi_ and concerns in Sacramento. on Orange ties. Mn Linsky pointed out illcundusion that Former Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle, now CoantylL Wager not Only near water can be rendered usable by President of Pringle&Associates Consulting, Future." desalination.Areas vdth highly mineralized followed with advice on Imw to communicate groundwater,land even inland sh'e:uns and rivers effectiveb with legislators. Based on his experi- with excessive salt content,could gain usable ence as:a legislator;and now as an individual who water supplies through desalting wchnolOgy, represents various interests befinc the.legisla- lure,he addressed the following points: Making Ourselves Heard 6 Communicate clearly who you are. Don't While there is much M be done to enhance just identity vonrself and lour organization; water reliability and yualit'at the local level, rather,explain what connection von and your state and federal Fars. regulations,funding,and organizntion have to that legislator and his or programs all affect Orange Counh�and can do her district. Each Assembly member has more so even more in\aces than 90g000 people in to come. Several the district to listen to, conference presenters each state senator has stressed the import- "We in Orange Countyy are as lied to the Santa nearly a trillion people ante of organizing and Ana Bit er ns all of.Southern California is tied to to listen to,and each maintaining a Netter Blebopnlitrm and file renter importation system. county official in South coordinated and more represents Californiandr lli•eruh hwk nI our renter finhux midm°t represents hundreds of effective approach to Iaaking at Ihis watershed.- thousands Or even communicating Orange millions of people. COuntys needs and -R ILLIAM \I ELLS, concems in those state Therefore,that des !k•nrrnl:1lnnnger Ormgr Gunny Al tiler Olsb'tvl and federal forums. makeell to than decision maker with that context The audience and in mind, Participants received some valuable advice from 6 Explain clearly and concisely what you are state legislators.Assembhumn Richard talking about. State legislators vote on 5,000 Ackerman,who represents the,2nd Assembly bills a vem,and are constantly having to shift District,encompassing the Orange Count from one subject to another.They have limit- communities of Brea,Fullerton. Placentia,and ell time to listen,and they almost certainly do Yorba Linda,spoke to the conference about the not share your expertise or fascination with developments that led to the legislatures passage the subject matter you are bringing to them. You have to find a way to explain your issues in 1999 0l'Proposition 13,a major bond issue and ideas as simply and as appropriately as that appeared on the March 1,2000 dadlot. He possible.Tell them exactiv what it means,but also emphasized the importance for local Continued on Page 6 Conflnued from Nge 7 Comprehensive Water Reclamation and not with the detail or in the jargon with which you Reuse Study,for which he is resporuibk:, are familiar.Furthermore,you may have to do this Mr.Kacnwer stated that the study had more than once,since time passes between stages established that a regional coalition can of the legislative process and that legislator will be very effective if it assembles and have dealt with many other matters in between. marshals support for an entire array of a Understand when you need to reach(hem. projects,rather than fighting a zero-sum Make your first approach to them eadp on in an battle in which one community's gain is -'y'A"�• ` issue,before party lines and caucus positions perceived to be its neighbors loss. solidify. For instance,once legislators decide On a more local scale.Stan OPelie, upon a party caucus position on a bill,your Chief Executive Officer of the Orange ability to change a legislator's mind has been County Business Council.encouraged greatly diminished. Orange County water agencies to develop a Don forget to convey why your issue and your a unified message and promote that Steven Just.", point of view is important to them. Know the message among the business cominuniN as way U.S.Buraaa of legislator's philosophy and frame your issue in a of building more effective coalitions. Reclamation. wm that the legislator can understand why they With a coordinated message, Mr. ORelie should vote for it and continued,the water how they can explain agent'community their vote(to would find a very nespon- Ibemselves as well as `Hou• important ix toner In the Lushness size partner in the others). Let them voi a maitg and to the general puLlh•P Orange County business know,for example, I'm enarinred that if nv if....I'd du•(inter(and fit, comnumih'.Two of the why your position is a Irawr didn't cams•out. or if tre flashed the toilet largest businesses In worthwhile cause for a conservative rail it rlirin'I frorA. if fit l our water systennx and Orange County have Republican unit our sru,, syWemx Larked up the fray our f i"ca!p told him that water is as liberal Democrat. Lark up, dun,' i uld fir peoplr.elandbng out fit important to them in rant u t our house 1,ill, loe,hrs'. rleruruulin r that elechicity.Turning to At the federal level, f f./ R Steven er.Plan- you cam e our sitfhcy ouuld lynch yu° the water a•envy P representatives at the ning Offfiicerver far the conference,be said. Lmver Colorado Region -5t'ws Oi�n:i.u;, lCdr ren Orange Cnnnn ,ss Caunrit your mess;�ige—with of the U.S. Bureau of f Execulfre O O >� g J B,Wn legislators and other Reclamation,under- decision makers— to be the advantages s would be much room that gained to Washbuild or join be local communities effective if ou had people like that convewing your that are able to build urjnin regional coalitions' inessage on soar behalf. IJesaihing the 13un•:ms Sauthem Cal(louiu For further Mr. Oftelie added that there is an effective, inf.em.tion about important,and successful water community in Fouts al+ Orange Connh% but it has not been part of the Orange County',. general business community. Nate,Future. Agreeing. Rupert Bein,Chairman of the Infrn- please contact: : structure Committee of the Orange Couny' Business Council,encouraged his colleagues in the• William Rlomquist, wvterbusiness to overcome their tendency Indiana University- to Purdue University communicate primarily with one another. "You all at Indianapolis about Colorado River, B:n'/Delta.and fn groundwater, lie to said,"but many you have (317) 274-7547 token the time to speak at Kiwniwa mis or Potxnt visit Fax:(317)275-3250E-mail: �• �� � your city council member or side legislator'?We blomquitaiupui.edu • need to ge(the word out."Water.be concluded,is •i probable the primary issue v e face for the eco- or nomic health of Southern California. m Karl Seekel, f Municipal x_ Nato District of The Orange County Water.Cnrrfemnce,sponxoned Orange County by a dozen public and private organizations.wen (714) 593-5024 the f rst r fan annual series. Watch this neimletter Fax:(714)964-9359 _ fin-Infommtion about the see, nd conference,to be Eanailt held late in 2000, kseckelOmwdoc.com Daily Pilot Page 1 of 3 1 . r NEWS News z co a , I want my new day camera TODAY! Pick a category ZJ Thursday, May 11, 2000 The nerdle connoisseur ■ Recently identified source of beach pollution has been part of lifeguard's quirky collection for decades. ByALEX COOLMAN They were a big surprise in a report released lost month about beach pollution: hundreds of thousands of tiny plastic pellets, scattered across the sands of the Orange County coastline in for greater numbers than anyone had suspected. But to Eric Bauer, they were no surprise at all. Bauer, who worked as a junior lifeguard in Huntington Beach in the 1970s and is today a lifeguard lieutenant with the Newport Beach Fire and Marine Department, says he's been collecting the plastic pellets for decades. Among those who know about them, Bauer says, the objects even have a name, a term with a diminutive tone perfectly fitting to their tiny size. Nerdles. If you've never heard of nerdles, it's not because they're rare. The pinhead-size pellets, which are the raw material for industrial production of a wide variety of plastic products, end up on beaches after they become trapped in urban runoff, Bauer said. And they show up in very large quantities. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, which last month released a study detailing the types of garbage found on Orange County's beaches, collected 105 million of them in just two http://www,latimes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000 Daily Pilot Page 2 of 3 months. The sheer volume of these plastic pebbles was in fact one of the most remarkable findings of the report, said Shelly Moore, a marine biologist with the group. But because nerdles are so small, Moore said, they have a way of escaping the attention of the average beachgoer. "Most people aren't looking for them, and they're not real easy to see."she said. "They blend in real well with the sand° because they tend to be white or clear in color and not much larger than the grains of sand themselves. Fortunately for the progress of science, Bauer has been paying very close attention. In a special jar he keeps at home, Bauer has amassed a prize nerdle collection. He's got dozens of the run-of-the-mill clear, black or white nerdles, but he also has a select few in hard-to-find colors like blue, green and the extremely elusive red. The jar also houses a small plastic doll, another artifact from his beach scouring. The icon keeps watch over the collection. "She's 'Nerdle Spice,' " Bauer noted. For a long time, Bauer said, the origin of the pellets was shrouded in mystery. Some people thought they were bits of coagulated wax from surfboards, he said. Others thought they were used on container ships as a sort of ball bearing-style device to help move heavy loads. The most arcane theory, Bauer said, held that they were the tears of squid. A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report released in 1992 cleared up some of the ambiguity about where exactly nerdles came from. The report also noted that nerdles, far from being a problem limited to California, are found on beaches all over the world. There are nerdles in Costa Rica. There are nerdles in the Sargasso Sea. Nerdles wash up in Alaska and they pepper the coast of Lebanon. But Newport Beach, especially around the Santa Ana River mouth, is a particularly rich hunting ground, Bauer says. And while that's not really anything to be proud of—the pellets are pollution, after all — It does make http://www.lahmes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000 Daily Pilot Page 3 of 3 this area fertile ground for a nerdle obsession. Just don't go expecting to find a red one unless you've got a lot of time to look. Feedback to dailvoiloK_?latimes.com http://www.latimes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000 • 1 � � 1 � 1 aim �mmmsg ~►��.tREM—v7:liaiy't�wl ..-I ay f a. M' sawr . W�IY T�'7•J....^in:�xq ri•.° Sr'n' im r \r:N Oki AF `� �! ,4�L"i•�:: 7rC,.,e:u %�y:~ra'.•`'.-'+a�T;'�.i ~;Y.`;I eX. q. .ii.�or{e w��l .��•'N: 1 Rid_•° ,,r •p�,il':i.�Yi1 il%11""nl-���U:..��9� 1 lia Mil, 1♦ ..I���i tiN 4ra.i.au• ♦• .•�• udYr��r♦s1 5,4.��i Y - .11 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,IRVINE i BERI(ELET . DAVIS . IRVINE . LOS ANGELES , RIVERSIDE $AN DIEDD SAN FlIANCISCO 1 • SAMABA0.BARA $.VfIA C0.UZ t School of Social Ecology 300 Social Ecology I Irvine,CA 92697-7050 April 5,2000 Board of Directors Jan Debay, Chair County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Ms. Debay: Thank you for your gift of the lab equipment to support the work being done at Environmental Analysis and Design. On behalf of the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine, we would like to thank you for your generosity. We apologize for not acknowledging your contribution sooner. We appreciate the recognition of the importance of our research, for it can only be achieved through gifts and support such as yours. Sincerely, ppi Kelley Lun&& Director, External Relations School of Social Ecology Date: April 13, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints PLANT N0. 1 2000 yy p 5i �a s fck Nava" Dec §� Jan a s Feb �e Mar a A r May Jun Jul a n Au Sao las Oct a 11/15 no 12111 yes 1/6 no 3121 no 4/6 yes 12125 n0 3/21 ❑o 4/25 e5 4/zs es plant related Total: 0 1 0 0 0 3 PLANT NO. 2 2000 Nov u Dec € ° Jan 3° Feb a z Mar s° A r a' May a c Jun 1.2 Jul & Auga a See a a Oct 11/13 n0 12/7 no 2/3 no 3/4 as 4/20 no 5/3 BS 12 no 2/10 es 3/17 no 4/27 es A3 12/29 no 2/13 es 4/29 no 2/19 no plant related 2/20 no Total: PPO 0 0 2 1 1 1 Collection Systems 2000 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct 11/5 12114 1/3 218 312 4113 11/9 12123 1/3 2/15 3/6 4114 11/15 12/28 1/6 2/28 3115 4/18 11/15 12/28 1/10 4/26 11/15 125 4/28 11/15 1/27 1/23 Coll.: Total 7 Total 4 Total 6 Total 3 Total 3 Total 5 Total Total Tatal Total Total M-t-I RJO:YSH:ctll AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 24, 2000 —7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 05/24100 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting). 8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on April 26, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/00 04/30/00 Totals $5.694,661.78 $5,794,492.22 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Receive and file summons and complaint, Mladen Buntich Construction Company v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000005719, for breach of contract in connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, and refer to General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 05/24/00 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 24, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 26, 2000 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re May 3, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 3, 2000 to be filed. C. Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for Purchase of Storage Area Network, Specification No. E-277, in connection with the Computerized Facility Atias and Document Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, to upgrade a portion of the District's networking infrastructure, for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85. d. Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales, maintenance costs of$900 per month, and $90 per hour for emergency maintenance services, effective July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in a forth approved by General Counsel. e. 1) Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty repair on eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a total project budget cost not to exceed$150,000; and 2)Authorize staff to award a sole source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services, Inc. for warranty repair work to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total amount not to exceed $150,000. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re May 4, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 4, 2000 to be fled. C. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, for a total revised project budget of$3,475,762; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41.1, with Advanco Constructors, Inc, authorizing an addition of$92,891 and 85 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,390,547; and (3)Accept Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41,1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. 05/24/00 Page 4 d. (1)Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444 (Rebid), for a total revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1444 (Rebid); (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$47,289, and a time extension of 40 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $954,229; and (3)Accept Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, for an amount not to exceed $2,255,680. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch for design of Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for a total amount not to exceed $2,208,810. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re May 10, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 10, 2000 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000. d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2000. e. Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending March 31, 2000. f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-10, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for. (1) Create Accounting Supervisor classification at pay range Ell ($60,828-$86,064); (2) Create Human Resources Supervisor classification at pay range Ell ($50,828-$86-064); (3) Create Lead Pump Power Operator at pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883); and, (4) Change the title of Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator. h. Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities Capacity Charge rate and structure until the Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Program is modified. 05/24/00 Page 5 i. Approve an increase for the Temporary Employment Services contracts total amount from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for FY 99-00, and approve funding in the amount of$1,900,000 for FY 00-01. 16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re May 15, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 17, 2000 to be filed. 17. Actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 2-41: a. Verbal report by Director of Engineering b. Verbal report by General Counsel C. Receive and file written comments, if any d. Open public hearing e. Close public hearing f. Discussion by Board g. Continue to July 19, 2000 regular Board Meeting for consideration of the final EIR. 18. Actions re approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46: a. Verbal report by Director of Engineering b. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-11, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46; Approving Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 19. Ordinance No. OCSD-13, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Amending Ordinance No. OCSD-05 Re Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Amending Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06 re Class I and Class II Industrial Waste Discharger Permittee Charges for Use, and Repealing Ordinance No, OCSO-10: a. (1) Implement Sewer Service Charge rates for 2000-01 equal to those previously adopted for Revenue Area 3. These rates will be based upon 05/24/00 Page 6 the single-family residential rate of$78 per year and the percentages adopted in Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Previously adopted higher rates in other Revenue Areas may be implemented as needed in the future. (2) Implement previously adopted Sewer Service Charge rates in Revenue Area 7. The base single-family residential rate to be $73 per year. (3) Change flow parameters for non-residential users. (4) Set flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Suspended Solids (SS) rates for Source Control Permit Users. b. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 2, 2000. C. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-13 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. d. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-13 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) e. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-13, and pass to second reading and public hearing on June 28, 2000. 20. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 05/24/00 a Page 7 a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). 2. Confer with General Counsel and District's designated representative (Chair Jan DeBay) re salary, compensation and benefits to be paid to the new General Manager, Blake P. Anderson (Government Code Section 54957.6). 3. Confer with District's Labor Negotiators (Human Resources Representative and General Manager) re salaries, benefits, terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by IUOE- Local 501 and SPMT Unit (Government Code Section 54957.6) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 21. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 22. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 23. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411,.ext. 7130 H:bry.dtMager VBmrd Agendas�2000 Swrd Agendas\0524 .do BOARD OF DIRECTORS n ngoBeB Tn Btl.afgr. gS/29/B0 AGENDA REPORT RM Number I 1f MMWr 7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular meeting. For new Directors' information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1 st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board Mby.EUYp"M"1BerN•exN"R�N I .R"pNa�].0 Rw e¢BAB Page 1 meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Hby.�A�R"p.Mc\lpb RwN Ag RlpMb�)0% R. °'m'°° Page 2 ' tl Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING APRIL 26, 2000 v�Ja�v AHITgI�oy FCr,HQ HT EN����� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on April 26, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS A Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson Peer Swan,Vice Chair X Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Michael L Maertzweiler X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer Margie L. Rice X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi A Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Mike Moore; Mark Esquer; Catherine Biele; Paula Zeller, Kent C. Nelson; Jim Elo; Emilio Ariston OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Ralph Bauer, Nancy Donavan; Sandra L. Genis; Phil Stone; Terry Lane; James Thurber; Walid Koram Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 3 APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM In the absence of the Chair and Vice Chair, a motion was made, seconded and adopted unanimously to appoint Director Pat McGuigan as Chair pro tem. PUBLIC COMMENTS Emilio Ariston, a District's employee, handed out a written statement addressed to the Board and spoke to the Directors by reading the letter. He stated his objection to the staff and management handling of a"grievance" he had filed against the District on December 28, 1999. The letter, with attachments,were made part of the record of this meeting. The basic issue concerned a problem-solving action and not a grievance as defined in the District's Human Resources policies. As a non-agenda item, no action was taken. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair pro tem McGuigan recognized Ralph Bauer, councilmember of the City of Huntington Beach. Mr. Bauer informed the Directors that Chair Jan Debay, while attending a meeting of SCAG in Los Angeles today, became ill and was transported to a hospital in the area. Chair Debay was resting comfortably and would be transported to Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach the following day. Director McGuigan referred the Directors to a supplemental agenda item that was placed in the meeting folders, as well as a letter from the City of Garden Grove in opposition of rate consolidation. It was then announced that the OMITS Committee members would be meeting in the lobby of the administration building on May 3p and take a walking tour of the District's Laboratory prior to the meeting. The PDC Committee members will meet at Plant 2 in Huntington Beach on May 4"for a tour of several proposed projects prior to their meeting. The Distrito received an award from the California Water Environment Association's (CWEA) Engineering and Research Committee. They selected the District's "Peak Flow Management Plan" as the 1999 Best Engineering Wastewater Project in the State of California. Staff members Jim Herberg, Larry Kraemer, Mark Esquer, Ron Wade, Jim Elo, Angie Anderson and Dan Tunnicliff were recognized for their efforts in the development of this plan, as well as consultants Paul Gustafson of Camp Dresser McGee, Duane Jensen and Walid Karam of Carollo Engineers and Jack Campbell of CPG, Inc. Chair pro tem McGuigan then reported that Chair Debay has appointed Directors Steve Anderson, Russell Patterson and Shawn Boyd as aftemate directors to the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to General Manager Donald F. McIntyre for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 4 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Mr. McIntyre reported that Supplemental Agenda Item No. (21)(a), (b) and (c) , which is the approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Orange and City of Huntington Beach regarding on-going investigations on the beach closures,was a coordinated effort to address urban run-off and any monies to be spent on the investigations would be brought to the Board for approval. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported that the District received a favorable court ruling regarding a District's employee who, after voluntary termination, requested to return to work. The court ruled that the Human Resources Department followed proper procedures and upheld management's decision to not allow the employee to return. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 22, 2000 is deemed approved, as corrected. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/00 03/31/00 Totals $5,300,788.21 $3,946,010.00 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute a quitclaim deed for a 15-foot wide by 213.77-foot long sewer easement to Plantero Drive LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, in a form acceptable to General Counsel. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District, providing for appointment of alternate Directors in lieu of the General Manager to the Joint Cooperative Committee. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Amend Board Minutes of December 15, 1999 relative to approving a project with Ashbrook Corporation to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit at no cost to the District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an approximate cost of $125,000 contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4%improvement in cake solids. Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 5 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair pro tem of the Steering Committee, re the April 26, 2000 meeting. The Chair pro tem then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meetings held on March 22, 2000 and April 3,2000 to be filed. C. Item removed from agenda 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the April 5, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 5, 2000 to be fled. C. Garry Brown of the Orange County Coastkeepers, spoke to the Directors in support of the proposed policy. Sandra Genis of the Boise Chica Land Trust also spoke to the Directors in support of the polity, and encouraged the Board to consider extending the policy as the District's capacity expands. Directors then entered into a brief discussion regarding procedures, costs, and the protection of the District's NPDES permit. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-04, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-05, Declaring Support for Biosolids Application, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-03. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the April 6, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 6, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment increase of$84,931 to Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,166,205; (2) Ratify Change Order No.4 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of$1,034 and 69 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $717,866; and (3)Accept Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 6 d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$130,622 and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,593,409. e. - MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, for an addition of$552,000, increasing the total contract amount to $10,057,256. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve sole source Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for on-call computer services necessary to update and maintain computer models developed under the 1999 Strategic Plan, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000. Director Mark Murphy abstained. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for design and study of Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-67, for a total amount not to exceed $283,280. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4,for an amount not to exceed $845,300. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers for professional engineering services for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $308,212; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$2,594,000 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for a total project budget of$3,394,000. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements, Contract No. 2-50, for a total amount not to exceed $504,685. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C. for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, providing for additional consulting services in the amount of$459,703 for a total amount not to exceed $2,788,384. Director Mark Murphy abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 7 I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$420,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$5,516,830. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 12, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 12, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-06,Authorizing Formation of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation and Authorizing Certain Related Actions. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-07, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, a member of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meetings held on March 20 and April 17,2000. The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 20, 2000, to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve License Agreement with the Orange County Water District for the construction and operation of Water Factory 21 Groundwater Injection Well and Conveyance Facilities from the Orange County Water District, at no cost to the District, in form approved by General Counsel. 17. FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION OF REVENUE AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE USER FEE RATE Director Mark Leyes referred the Directors to a copy of a letter from the City of Garden Grove that was included in their meeting folders. He expressed concern regarding the economic issues surrounded by the rate consolidation and diminished accountability. After discussion among the Directors a substitute motion was made to delay consideration of the rate consolidation until May 24, 2000. The motion failed by a vote of 6 ayes to 13 nays. Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 8 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve consolidation of Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 for fiscal year 2000-01, including the postponement of portions of user fee increases previously adopted through 2001-02, as set forth in detail in the staff agenda report of April 26,2000. The motion passed by a vote of 18 ayes to 4 nays. 18. CEQA ACTIONS RE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 A brief report was given by Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering regarding the CEQA process and proposed alternatives re the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No.2-41. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish May 24, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. at the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time, and place, for the public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 2-41; and (2) Establish May 31, 2000, as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No.241. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: The Chair requested that Item 21 be considered at this time. 21. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize consideration of Item 21(b) and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. Director of Technical Services reported that the proposed Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach defines the roles in the investigations into the beach closures and does not obligate the District in any way. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach re future procedures and continuing beach closure investigations as originally authorized by Board action of January 26, 2000. 19. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos. 19(a)(1) and (2). CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9 AND 54957: The Board convened in closed session at 9:10 p.m., pursuant to Govemment Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(1). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 19a)(3), and no report was given. Minutes for Board Meeting 04/26/00 Page 9 RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:17 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. 19. a. 2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-08, Amending General Manager's Contract of Employment. Directors Gullixson and Bankhead opposed. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m. Secretary jjhe Board irectors of Orange County Sanita ion District H:Wwp.Aa1agendaSm,d MinthsUG00 Burd M1nWm%042000.d= Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on Accounts Payable-Warrants 25950 Court Order $ 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25951 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25952 Duthie Penner Services 81,691.74 Generator Supplies 25953 Orange County Sanitation District 420.253.14 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25954 OII 5th Partial Consent Decree Escrow Account 95.799.00 Operating Industries,Inc.Landfill,Superfund Site Settlement 25955 Southern California Edison 60,081.26 Power 25956 Allied PacMng 8 Rubber,Inc. 187.72 Mechanical Supplies 25957 American Airlines 7,670.07 Travel Services 25958 American Express 12,523.82 Purchasing Card Program 25959 ARKTechnologies 5,285.00 Data Processing 259W American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 12.03 Telephone Service 25961 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 25962 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 259W Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25964 Compu Master 895.00 Registration 25965 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 502.23 Plumbing Supplies 25988 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 225.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. p 25987 CWEA Annual Conference 200.00 Conference Registration 25968 D.R.McNatty B Associates 2.190,00 Registration-Software Training H. 25969 The Delphi Group 1.080.00 Registration rt 25970 Employment Development Dept. 4,251.92 Reimbursable Unemployment Costs 25971 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25972 ESRI,Inc. 800,00 Training Registration 25973 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 25974 Ganahl Lumber Company 165.63 Lumber/Hardware 25976 GTE California 2,203.98 Telephone Services 25976 Hach Company 351.53 Chemicals 25977 Industrial Metal Supply 1,321.09 Metal 25978 Industrial Plastic Supply, Inc 693.88 Plastic Window for Scrubbers 25979 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc 88.17 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25980 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.46 Dues Deduction 25981 ICOM Amedca,Ina 92.15 Lab Supplies 25902 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div, 2,739.30 Safely Supplies 25983 J.D. Edwards 400.011 FIS 1099 Processing Training 25984 League of Ca.Cities,Orange County Div. 40.00 Meeting Expense 25M McMaster-Can Supply Co. 3,381.95 Tools 25986 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 5,915.00 Training Registration 25987 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 6,445.97 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 25988 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25989 Orange County Marshall 110.00 Wage Garnishment 26990 OCFA 686.20 Dues Deduction 25991 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25992 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25993 Peace Officers Council of CA 765.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 311100 to 3116100 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 25994 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 156.55 Paint Supplies 25995 So.Cal.Gas Company 7,424.39 Natural Gas 25996 SoftView Computer Products 1,044.21 Computer Supplies 25997 SoftChoice 2,753.32 Software 25995 Southern California Air Cond.Dist. 60.22 Electrical Supplies 25999 Southern California Academy of Sciences 90.00 Registration 26000 State of Califomia 149.82 Wage Garnishment 26001 Summit Steel 620.33 Metal 26002 Mark A.Tomko 253.53 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 26003 United Way 432.60 Employee Contributions 26004 Nicholas J.Amontes 237.18 Meetingrl-ralning Expense Reimb. 26005 Bradley H.Cagle 1,556.39 Copying/Duplicating Expense Reimb. 26006 Andrel loan 255.28 Meeting?reining Expense Reimb. 26007 Turn L.Josway 528.05 Meeting/Treining Expense Reimb. 26000 Julie A.Matsumoto 357.44 MeetingRraining Expense Reimb. 26009 Michael D.White 408.47 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26010 In-N-Out 6W.00 Catering Services-Y2K Celebration 26011 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 26012 RPI/Blo Gro 112,058.89 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 26013 Blue Cross of California 172,208.64 Medical Insurance Premium 26014 Calif Centrifugal Pump 34,806.62 Pump Supplies 26015 City of Newport Beach 247,359.75 Construction Reimbursement Agreement 5.41 26016 City of Santa Ana 30,916.00 Connection Fee Refund 26017 Canputerized Facility Integration 174,689.90 Engineering Service J-25-1 26018 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying,Inc. 32,577.28 Engineering Services P-183 28019 K.S.Dunbar 8 Associates 28,375.00 Engineering Services 241 26020 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium 26021 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 37,644.81 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 26022 Moo Analytical System 41,830.80 Professional Services-Hunt.Beach Closure 26023 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 27,202.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 26024 Nat West Markets 64,207.57 COP Letter of Credit Fees 26025 Pro Logis Trust 60,899.00 Connection Fee Refund 20026 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 258,903.04 Ocean Monilodng MO 6.8-94 26027 Tula Ranch/Megan Farms 66,171.01 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 26025 Woodru8,Spradlin&Smart 44.432.90 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 26029 Ark Construction Company 198,688.00 Construction P1444 26030 Margate Construction,Inc. 650,447.64 Construction P2-39 26031 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 37,874.00 Construction P2-61 26032 S.S.Mechanical Corp 228,7a2.60 Construction P1 48.2 8 J-53 26033 Soulhem Contracting Company 84,522.00 Construction P2-47-1&J-33-1 26034 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 146,109.20 Construction 7.7.1 26035 Union Bank of California 25,420.31 Construction P146-2 8 J-53 26036 A-Plus Systems 5,302.45 Notices 6 Ads 26037 Air Cold Supply 44.32 Air CondSioner Supplies 26038 Airborne Express 202.12 Air Freight Pepe 2 of r. - Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28039 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 2,800.00 Human Resources Service 28040 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 712.00 Lab Supplies 26041 Appleone Employment Service 3.450.05 Temporary Employment Services 26042 Applied Industrial Technology 1.182.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies 28043 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste Oil Removal 26044 Aspen Publishers, Inn 137.18 Publication 28045 Atlantis Pool Care 180.00 Service Agreement 26046 Awards&Trophies By Bea 83.03 Plaques 2e047 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 156.36 Office Supplies 26048 AMAI/Keye Productivity Center 229.00 Registration 26049 APEX Communicetlons 1,300.00 Security Equipment 26050 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 43.82 Telephone Service 26051 AT&T Wireless Services 34346 Cellular Telephone Service 26052 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service 26053 Battery Specialties 498.45 Batteries 26054 Ban Meadows Company,Inc. 96.21 Lab Supplies 26055 Bloomberg L.P. 5.301.30 Financial Monitoring M04.14-93 26056 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,228.26 Engineering Services 3-38-1 26057 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,846.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 26058 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 125.00 Membership 26059 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 9,709.00 Engineering Service J40-3 26060 Center for Watershed Protection 7.00 Publication 26061 Century Paint 367.56 Paint Supplies 26062 Charles P.Crowley Co. 436.96 Instrument Parts 26063 Compressor Components Of California 2.370.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26064 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 899.97 Registration 26065 Connell GM Parts 105.07 Tmck Supplies 26M Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4,083.20 Electrical Supplies 26067 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 182.79 Plumbing Supplies 26068 Converse Consultants 264.00 Consulting Services 3-38-3 26069 Cooper Energy Services 181.15 Engine Supplies 26070 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,740.35 Copier Lease 26071 Corporate Express Imaging 350.19 Computer Supplies 26072 Corporate Express 254.39 Office Supplies 26073 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 981.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26074 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 112.00 Communication Service Agreement 26075 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,419.67 Electrical Supplies 26076 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Conference Registration 26077 CWEA Membership $5.00 Membership 26078 David Rosenblatt 3511.011 Expert Panelist Raimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue 25079 David's Tree Service 5,040.D0 Tree Meint.Service 26080 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 10,547.85 3 Notebook Computers 26081 Da2udk C/O Misce/SouthWest 995.54 Valves 26082 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 164.43 Paint Supplies 26083 DOB Engineering,Inc. 11,844.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 311100 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26064 DGA Consultants,Inc. 144.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 26085 Eberhard Equipment 214.78 Tractor Repair 26086 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 299.00 Medical Screening 26057 Electra-Bond 23,424.85 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26088 Employers Group Service Corp. 585.00 Registration 26089 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 20D90 Environmental Express 1,643.72 Lab Supplies 26091 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 2,000.00 Training Registration 26092 FedEx Corporation 230.69 Air Freight 26093 Filter Supply Company 100.27 Filters 26094 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 454.85 Lab Supplies 28095 Flo-Systems,Inc 441.90 Pump Supplies 26096 Fountain Valley Camera 56.86 Photo Supplies 26097 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 211.00 Tmdr Wash Tickets 2BD98 Fountain Valley Points,Inc. 83.73 Point Supplies 26099 Foxboro Company 417.49 Instrument Supplies 26100 Pryer Seminars 195.00 Training Registration 26101 Fry's Electronics 501.B0 Computer Supplies 25102 FM International,Inc. 8.212.29 Professional Services J-25-1 28103 Garrett-Callahan Company 42.03 Chemicals 26104 GTE California 5,979.80 Telephone Services 28105 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 10.862.95 Belt,Filter Press Supplies 28106 Government Finance Officers Association 49.95 Publication 26107 WIN Grainger,Inc. 225.06 Compressor Supplies 20108 GBC(General Binding Corp) 226.04 Printing Service 26109 Hach Company 775AS Chemicals 26110 Herrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 424.07 Plumbing Supplies 26111 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 77.89 Catering Services 26112 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 1.573.43 Engineering Services 241 26113 Home Depot 225.13 Small Hardware 26114 Hub Auto Supply 294.45 Truck Parts 28115 lotus Consulting,L.L.C. 7.850.00 Records Management Program 25116 Imaging Plus,Inc. 8.00 Printing Service 26117 Industrial Metal Supply 312.78 Metal 26118 Informatics Corporation 6,000.00 Consultant Service-Final Effluent Quality 26119 Irvine Photo Graphics 28.49 Photographic Services 26120 IBM Corporation 6,060.D0 IBM AS/400 Y2K Hotsile 28121 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safely Div. 1,205.35 Safety Supplies 26122 J 8 B Auto Pens 9.83 Auto Pans 8 Supplies 26123 J B W Scientific 1,560.97 Lab Supplies 26124 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 6,320.96 Instrument Supplies 20125 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 1,991.22 Misc.Construction Services-Bubbler System Repair W Bay Badge P.S. 26126 Jay's Catering 700.47 Catering Services 26127 Johnstone Supply 329.13 Electrical Supplies 28128 Kamen Industrial Technologies 2.935.15 Mechanical Supplies Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26129 Knox 1.616.75 Tools 26130 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 224.37 Safety Supplies 26131 Lab Support 744.00 Temporary Employment Services 26132 Lee&Ro, Inc. 3,549.23 Engineering Consulting Services;-J47 26133 Liebert Cassidy 2.620.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 25134 LucGi's 47.50 Meeting Expense 26135 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc 13,140.00 Engineering Services Pl62 26135 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2.519.21 Mechanical Supplies 28137 The Marketing Group,Inc. 849.37 Lab Supplies 26138 MawVac Electronics 70.32 Instrument Supplies 26139 Akico Systems, Inc. 2,264.42 Communication Equipment Upgrade 26140 Me Junkin Corporation 609.07 Plumbing Supplies 26141 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,110.41 Tools 25142 Measurement Vanables,Inc. 436.T7 Filters 25143 Mid-West Associates 1,128.83 Pump Supplies 26144 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5.872.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28145 Milknonica,Inc. 489.51 Electrical Supplies 26146 Mission Uniform Service 3.381.20 Uniform Rentals 26147 MotoPhoto 69.65 Photographic Services 26148 Mulliquip Z13 Freight Adjustment 26149 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association 50.00 Membership 26150 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,252.90 Instrument Supplies 26151 Neal Supply Co. 352.12 Plumbing Supplies 26152 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 2.511.93 Lubrirant'Diesel Fuel 26153 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 477.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO e-2498 26154 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 26155 Norrell Services,Inc. 224.06 Temporary Employment Service 26156 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,027.55 Office Supplies 26157 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 4.310-00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 26158 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 10.61 Plumbing Supplies 26159 Oxygen Service Company 919.39 Specialty Gases 26160 OCB Reprographics 5,459.64 Printing Service-Spec P-173 26161 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 453.71 Electrical Supplies 26162 Pacft Mechanical Supply 41.M.86 Plumbing Supplies 26163 Pagenet 2,037.63 Paging Services 26164 Polydyne,Inc. 22,884.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 26165 Port Supply 218.70 Rope 26186 Power Measurement Limited 13.025.00 Computer Supplies 28167 Praxair,Inc. 191.34 Welding Supplies 26168 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,189.82 Server Cleaning-Revenue Areal 25169 Pryor Resources,Inc 5,800.OD Training Registration 26170 Pump Engineering 2,748.35 Pump Supplies 28171 Pump Engineering Wor O Air 1,572.01 Compressor Supplies 26172 Quality Building Supply 210.55 Landscaping Supplies 26173 Ouanterta Environmental Services 2,328.00 Analytical Service Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 311100 to 3/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26174 Quickdeaning Janitorial Service 200.00 Groundskeeping Service 26175 Quidtstart Technologies 3,325.00 Professional Service-Software 26176 Rachel Noble 56.16 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt.Beach Issue 26177 Raney Industries 1,360.00 Contract Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification 26178 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1,412.00 Office Supplies 26179 Roto Rooter-N.O.C.4111 7,500.00 Sewer Line Repair 26180 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services-Tunnel Valve Access Platform 26131 RPM Electric Motors 19,908.94 Electric Motor Repair 26182 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 104.63 Paint Supplies 26183 Salety-Meen 4,193.00 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 26184 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 1,920.13 Mechanical Supplies 26186 Saratoga Institute,Inc. 2.490.68 Publications 26186 Schwing America,Inc 74.72 Pump Supplies 26187 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 161.63 Specialty Gases 26188 Sears Industrial Sales 404.45 Mechanical Supplies 26189 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 6,212.76 Professional Services-Ocean Ou6all lnstmmentation 26190 Second-Sun 156.20 Light Fixtures 26191 Sencotec, Inc. 537.46 Electrical Supplies 26192 Shade Concepts 6.890.00 Awning Installation-Admin. Bldg. 26193 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,456.05 Tools/Hardware 26194 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.911.96 Natural Gas 26195 Southern California Edison 1,685,34 Power 28196 Southern Christian Leadership Conference 495.00 Notices&Ads 26197 Spading Instruments,Inc. 221.08 Instrument Supplies 26198 Spex Ceriprep,Inc. 251.31 Lab Supplies 26199 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 3,063.40 Pump Supplies 26200 Starbudc Tmdc Refinishing,Inc. 404.00 Painting Service 26201 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annex.Processing Fee 26202 Sunset Industrial Parts 812.15 Mechanical Supplies 26203 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 26204 Textile Engineering Associates 230.00 Belt Press Supplies 26205 The Orange County Register 847.80 Notices&Ads 26206 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,747.99 Mechanical Supplies 26207 Time Motion Tools 1493.48 Tools 26208 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 26209 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 36.00 Lacks&Keys 26210 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,380.62 Truck Supplies 26211 Trueadeil Laboratories,Inc. 2,370.00 Lab Services 26212 Teksystems 2,295.20 Temporary Employment Services 26213 United Parcel Service 36.57 Parcel Services 25214 The University of Texas at Austin 450.00 Meeting Expense 26215 Unocal 76 58.22 Fuel for Vehicles-Conrad 3-38-1 26216 11-Line 234.63 Office Supplies 28217 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,409.83 Plumbing Supplies 26218 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 11,400.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Computer Programming Page 6 of 7 a, Claims Paid From 311100 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26219 Vortex Industries,Inc 1,422.00 Door Repair 28220 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.415.84 Lab Supplies 26221 Waters Corporation 149.68 Lab Supplies 26222 Western States Chemical,Ina. 283.13 Caustic Soda MO a-23-95 26223 Xerox Corporation 2,790.71 Copier Leases 26224 Blake Anderson 199.00 Meelingrfraining Expense Reimb. 26225 Layne T.Baroldi 756.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26226 Danny L.Dillon 498.47 Meelingrimining Expense Reimb. 26227 Michael D.Moore 863.75 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 26228 Addana Renescu&Gateway,Inc. 2,939.22 Employee Computer Loan Program 26229 Jerry F.Evangelista 2,650.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 26230 Orange County Sanitation District 22,117.68 Workers Comp.Reimb. 26231 Orange County Sanitation District 29.83 Petty Cash Reimb. 26232 CSMFO 140.00 Seminar Registration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.036.970.81 Payroll Disbursements 18412-18554 Employee Paychecks $ 166.726.62 Biweekly Payroll 31=0 18555-18555 Employee Paycheck 2,078.78 Termination 46969-47417 Direct Deposit Statements 687,794.84 Biweekly Payroll 3/8/00. Total Payroll Disbursements $ 836,60D.24 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148,301.49 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 128,819.11 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificata of Participation State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 105,801.31 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 44,295.25 1211199-22MO Ouarterly Liquidity Fee on Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 427.217.16 Total Claims Paid 3/1/00-3/16/00 $ 5.300.788.21 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 26233 Orange County Sanitation District $ 401,047.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 26234 Southern California Edison 45,919.54 Power 26235 Aidoo Systems, Inc. 24,733.00 Professional Services-Network Labeling 8 Documentation 26236 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing 19.95 Publication 26237 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,600.09 Training Materials 26238 ABB Instrumentation 495.40 Instrument Supplies 26239 APEX Communications 10.458.33 Security Equipment 28240 ASTD 150.00 Membership 26241 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.43 Telephone Service 26242 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 28243 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 26244 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1,594.70 Rope 26245 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 4,289.51 Security System Electrical Supplies 26246 City of Buena Park 638.37 Water Line Damage Reimb. 26247 Clemson University 4,425.00 Training Registration 26248 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 14.54 Office Supplies 26249 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 26250 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 889.57 Electrical Supplies 26251 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 406.0& Plumbing Supplies 26252 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,148.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training tD 26253 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,718.18 Electrical Supplies 26254 CSUS Foundation, Inc. 21.45 Publication 26255 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 26256 Fluid Dynamics 1,092.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental 26257 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 26258 G.F.O.A. 590.00 Registration 26259 Voided Check - - 26260 GTE California 946.45 Telephone Services 26261 Getinge Castle 332.79 Lab Supplies 26262 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction 26263 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 9,9W.32 Safety Supplies 26264 J.D.Edwards So.Calif. Users Group 300.00 Membership 26265 Johnstone Supply 199.85 Electrical Supplies 26266 Law/Crandall 2,694.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 26267 McGraw-Hill,Inc. 144.24 Publication 26268 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 605.41 Tools 26269 Mesa Consolidated Water Dist. 764.00 Hydrant Meter Deposit 26270 Mobile Mini, Inc. 183.61 Storage Bins Rental 26271 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 169.00 Training Registration 26272 Office Depot Business Services Div. 138.35 Office Supplies 26273 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3/31100 a Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26274 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 26275 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction 26276 Pacific Bell 1,131.24 Telephone Services 28277 Pacific Industrial Supply 30.71 Fum0ure 26278 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 26279 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 26280 Peace O01cers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 26281 Pinnacle One 16,866.00 Mediation Service 11-17-1 8 5.37-3 26282 Port Supply 17.78 Rope 26283 QuadetOvonin 193.40 Office Equipment Repair 26284 Rain for Rent 3,132.97 Plumbing Supplies 26265 R.A. Reed Electric 6.369.41 Motor Overhaul 26286 Saddle Island Institute 8.075.00 Training Registration-Analyzing Construction Schedules 26287 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 1.317.14 Mechanical Supplies 26288 Sceptre Advanced Business Solutions 4,126.00 Software Maint. 26289 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 447.78 Specialty Gases 26290 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,174.88 Tools 26291 So.California SLA Users Association 75.00 Membership 26292 State of California 133.04 Wage Garnishment 26293 Stephen Weisberg 811.45 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue 28294 Summit Steel 346.48 Metal 26295 Super Power Products 334.03 Janitorial Supplies 26206 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,439.68 Mechanical Supplies 26297 The Unisource Corporation 7,074.56 Office Supplies 26296 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 26299 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 3.134.56 Engineering Service-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II 26300 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 12.288.00 Consulting Service-Parametric Emissions Monitoring Program 26301 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.418.82 Lob Supplies 26302 Wdeg Scientific 404.08 Lab Supplies 26303 Blake Anderson 686.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26304 Robert S.Dumity 734.08 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimb. 28305 Peter M.Morrison 222.81 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimb. 26306 Hai Nguyen 835.80 Meefing/rmining Expense Reimb. 26307 Charles F.Wnsor 249.28 Meeling?raming Expense Reimb. 26308 Carollo Engineers 44,040.04 Engineering Service J-254 26309 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 43,685.88 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 26310 Cytec Industries 28,411.05 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 26311 Delta Dental 41,674.68 Dental Insurance Plan 28312 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 31,149.19 Engineering Services 241 26313 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 114,577.58 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 28314 Rellester 27.522.29 Employee Medical Health Premium 28315 Tran Consulting Engineers 38,469.00 Consulting Service 546 Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26316 Tran Consulting Engineers 27,850.00 Consulting Service Pl-65 26317 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 97,625.03 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 26318 V&A Consulting Engineers 34.390.86 Engineering Service-Evaluating Sulfide Removal 26319 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 204,31425 Generator Repair J-33-1 26320 Vulcan 46,396.22 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 26321 Barnard Construction Company,Inc. 227,160.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11 R 26322 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 121,611.70 Construction M8-1 26323 Ken Thompson, Inc. 89,088.13 Construction 11-17-3 26324 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 241,555.38 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 26325 NCCI Enterprises,Inc. 26.594.65 Engineering Services 240 26326 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 281.931.80 Construction 7-7-1 26327 Union Bank of California 25,240.00 Construction 3-35R 26328 A-Plus Systems 3,050.45 Notices&Ads 26329 AccuStandard,Inc. 739.01 Lab Supplies 26330 Action Instruments 1.285.65 Electrical Supplies 26331 Great American Printing Co. 552.10 Office Supplies 26332 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 6,000.23 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 26333 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 538.75 Registration 26334 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 2,DD2.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies -26335 Air Uquide America Corp. 664.43 Specialty Gasses 26336 Air Products&Chemicals 317.69 Lab Supplies 26337 Airborne Express 132.86 Air Freight 26338 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 1.057.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26339 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 104.09 Mechanical Supplies 26340 Altemative Dispute Resolution Design Group 4,400.00 Human Resources Service 26341 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 26342 Appleone Employment Service 10,443.47 Temporary Employment Services 26343 Applied Industrial Technology 53.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 26344 Arms Data Security 106.80 Oesite Back-Up Tape Storage 26345 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 2,099.00 Vacuum Truck Services 26346 Artistic Blinds 486.66 Office Supplies 26347 Ares Disposal Service, Inc. 926.72 Waste Removal 20348 Atlantis Pool Care 300.00 Service Agreement 26349 American Air Filter International 1,391.99 Filler 26350 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 999.59 Ceiling Tile 26351 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 40129 Telephone Service 26352 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 191.51 Telephone Service 26353 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2.416.76 Long Distance Telephone Service 26354 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 26355 Bailey, Fisher&Porter 354.95 Instrument Maint. 26355 Barton Instruments,L.L.C. 2,173.56 Instrument Supplies 26357 Battery Specialties 522.89 Batteries Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26442 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use 26443 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 26W Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,139.42 Safety Supplies 26445 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 5,242.30 Instrument Supplies 26446 J.D.Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration - 26447 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation 26448 Jays Catering 32.33 Catering Services 26449 Jobtrak 95.00 Notices&Ads 26450 Johnson Power Ltd. 832.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26451 Johnstone Supply 112.67 Electrical Supplies 26452 Kabbara Engineering 3,545.66 Professional Services-TraMic Control 26453 Kaman Industrial Technologies 572.16 Mechanical Supplies 26454 Karen Monaco&Associates 11,937.50 FIS Support Services 26455 Kensington Electronics 760.18 Electrical Supplies 26456 Knox Industrial Supplies 4,136.91 Tools 26457 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 2,197.55 Safety Supplies 26458 Lab Support 3.534.00 Temporary Employment Services 26459 La Molts Chemical Products 1,091.38 Chemicals 26460 Lee&Ro, Inc. 2,602.47 Engineering Consulting Services J-46 26461 Lexis-Nexis 112.99 Books B Publications 26462 Gerald R.Jones 8,853.73 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 26463 Liquid Handling Systems 3.889.78 Pumping Supplies 26464 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 897.80 Professional Services-Corrosion 26465 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,794.08 Tools 26466 Measurement Variables, Inc. 1,070.20 Air Dryer 26467 Medlin Controls Co. 2,867.95 Instrument Supplies 26468 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch Site Study 26469 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 605.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26470 Mission Uniform Service 3,314.26 Uniform Rentals 26471 Montgomery Watson 2,445.30 Professional Service-Emission Modeling 26472 Management Action Programs,Inc. 4,400.00 Training Registration 26473 MCR Technologies, Inc. - 720.21 Instrument Supplies 26474 National Institue of Business Mgnt. 48.00 Construction 11-17.3 26475 National Microcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 26478 National Plant Services,Inc. 2.332.50 Vacuum Truck Services 26477 Neal Supply Co. 626.35 Plumbing Supplies 26478 Newark Electronics 666.24 Instrument Supplies 26479 Nicholas Natty 4,800.00 Legal Service-INS Processing 26480 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14,587.07 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 26481 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 732.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 28482 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 26483 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,874.94 Office Supplies Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 2e484 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 793.13 Electrical Pans&Supplies 26485 Orange County Water District 4,D88.66 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 26486 Orange Valve&Filling Company 1,193.88 Fittings 26487 Oxygen Service Company 361.98 Specialty Gases 26488 OCB Reprographics 11.885.12 Printing Service-Spec P-173 26489 OCE-USA, Inc. 375.44 Computer Equipment Maint. 26490 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 651.11 Electrical Supplies 20491 Pacific Bell 30.60 Telephone Services 26492 Padfic Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 26493 Pacific Mechanical Supply 145.10 Plumbing Supplies 26494 Padre Janitorial Supplies 289.76 Janitorial Supplies 26495 Parker Supply Company 8.394.00 Electrical Supplies 26498 Parkhouse Tire Co. 176.93 Time 26497 Pans Unlimited 142.85 Truck Supplies 26498 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 808.40 Lab Supplies 26499 Philip J.W.Roberts,PHO, PE 1.997.50 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue 26600 Pickens Fuel Corp. 495.14 Professional Service-CNG Program 26501 Polydyne, Inc. 23.394.29 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 26502 Ponton Industries 2,337.02 Instrument Supplies 26503 Power Design 3,356.41 Electrical Supplies 26504 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 80.23 Electrical Supplies 26505 Power Lift Corporation 3,750.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training 26506 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental 26507 Presentation Products,Inc. 329.17 Office Supplies 26508 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin. 26509 Process Software Corp. 2.264.87 Software Maint. 26510 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 9,027.69 Sewer Cleaning-Revenue Area 7 26511 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,102.05 Mechanical Supplies 26512 DOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 20513 R. L.Abbott 8 Associates 12.000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 26514 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 26515 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,386.28 Life Insurance Premium 26516 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1.776.86 Office Supplies 26517 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 13.95 Training Supplies 26518 RPM Electric Motors 647.04 Electric Motor Repair 26519 S.S. Mechanical Corp 19,578.00 Construction Pl-36-2 26520 Safety-Kleen 225.47 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 26521 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2,724.53 4 Motors 26522 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 435.85 Mechanical Supplies 25523 Schwing America,Inc. 76.80 Pump Supplies 26524 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 19,562.34 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 26525 Scientific Refrigeration 3,245.16 Refrigerator Repair Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3/31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26526 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,284.37 Specialty Gases 26527 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 2,432.30 Lab Equipment Repair&Supplies 26528 Sears Industrial Sales 375.20 Mechanical Supplies 26529 Seaventures 4,650.D0 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 26530 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 4.927.50 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 26531 Second-Sun 457.70 Light Fixtures 26532 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 103.44 Tools 26533 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,912.53 Tools/Hardware 26534 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Service-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 26535 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration 26536 Soco-Lynch Corp. 1,766.75 Janitorial Supplies 26537 SoflChoice 444.62 Software 26538 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 417.88 Emission Fees 26539 South Coast Environmental Co. 6,447.00 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 26640 Southern California Edison 66.33 Power 26541 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 631.25 Janitorial Supplies 26542 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 5D0.00 COP Trustee Services 26543 Statoil Energy,Inc. 160.00 Registration 26544 Stewarrs De-Rooting&Plumbing 660.00 Plumbing Service 26545 Strata International,Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 26546 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 26647 Sunset Industrial Parts 280.39 Mechanical Supplies 26548 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 235.19 Electric Cart Parts 26549 Tekmar-Dohmian 182.37 Lab Supplies 26550 The Mertiwood Corporation 3,149.64 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 26551 Forma Scientific Division 1,782.59 Lab Supplies 26552 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 539.59 Mechanical Supplies 26553 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 26554 Time Warner Communications 42.49 Cable Services 26555 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 465.59 Locks&Keys 26556 The Trans Company 685.89 Electrical Supplies 26567 Transcat - 862.38 Electrical Supplies 26558 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc 2.550.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 26559 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 323.97 Truck Supplies 26560 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 170.00 Lab Services 26561 Teksystems 3,567.80 Temporary Employment Services 26582 Ultra Scientific 376.03 Lab Supplies 26563 United Parcel Service 680.35 Parcel Services 26564 University of Washington 70.00 Registration 26565 USFilter Westates 1,414.41 Instrument Supplies 26566 Valley Cities Supply Company 27.03 Plumbing Supplies 26567 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 17,508.00 Consulting Services-Ocean&Emissions Monitoring Computer Programming Page B of 9 Claims Paid From 3/16100 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26588 Vapex, Inc. 8,500.86 Pump Supplies 26569 Veme's Plumbing 15.684.97 Plumbing Equipment Repair 26570 Vertex, Inc. 943.89 Software Maint. 26571 Village Nurseries 76.42 Landscaping Supplies 26572 VCI Mechanical 275.00 Fuel Tank Certification Service 26573 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 9,135.72 Lab Supplies 26574 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,069.09 Security Guards 26575 Western States Chemical, Inc. 18.331.66 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 26576 Westem Switches 8 Controls, Inc. 67.77 Electrical Supplies 26577 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 1,958.51 Instrument Maird. 26578 Xemx Corporation 14,382.27 Copier Leases 26579 Union Bank of California 13,501.30 Construction 3-38-1 26680 Union Bank of California 11,136.02 Construction 11-17-3 26581 Thomas M.Flanagan 118.44 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimb. 26582 Chuck M. Forman 1,122.29 Meelingrrraining Expense Reimb. 26583 Charles G.Lee 210.85 Meeting?mining Expense Reimb. 26584 James D. Niswonger 127.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26585 John W. Swindler W7.64 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb. 26586 Frankle J.Woodside 633.64 Meetingrimining Expense Reimb. 26587 Moyasar T.Yell 977.85 Meelingfrmining Expense Reimb. 26588 Tyler T. Hoang 2,031.57 Employee Computer Loan Program 26589 Frank A. Leong 2,016.07 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.086.612.83 Payroll Disbursements 18556-18674 Employee Paychecks $ 159.034.04 Biweekly Payroll 322/00 18675- 18677 Employee Paycheck 22,723.66 Termination 47418-47862 Direct Deposit Statements 677,639.47 Biweekly Payroll 322100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869.397.17 Total Claims Paid 3/16/00-3/31100 $ 3,946,010.00 Page 9 of 9 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To6tl.ofDir. 5/24/00 AGENDA REPORT nem NUMW 1em IpMW Orange County Sanitation District 7 FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CECIA FINDINGS N/A "m aizumaoubENNrrREstlrn.oaaoc x—a sno9e Page 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 4/1100 — 4/15/00 & 4/16/00 —4/30/00. . BA A%v W n�LhW WFILESYbmap d ^� vxise Page 2 i AGENDA REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM As soon as the review of the Agenda Report is complete, call the contact person for pickup. Subject of Agenda Report: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts Contact: Name: Bill Aldridge Telephone Ext.: 7562 REVISION DATE TO S REVIEWED COMMENTS REQUIRED 5 8 Gib ivision an g J 8 � e General Manager Hdp.meYSAIIQabtlpNW9f6EStl®nWLLOx Page 3 Claims Paid From 4H/9D to 4111if00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 26590 Orange County Sanitation District $ 425,279.14 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 26591 Southern California Edison 61,232.76 Power 26592 American Airlines 13,203.82 Travel Services 26593 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.44 Telephone Service 26594 AT&T Wireless Services 3.855.20 Cellular Telephone Service 28695 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 26596 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 26597 Carollo Engineers 13,979.31 Professional Services-Kem County Biosolids Ordinance 26598 Coastal Conservancy 18.00 Publication 26599 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 26600 CASA 200.00 Conference Registration 26601 Environmental Law Institute 42.95 Publication 26602 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 26603 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Gamishment 26604 GTE California 40.51 Telephone Services 26605 Industrial Metal Supply 794.49 Metal 26606 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 26607 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 547.63 Safety Supplies 26608 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 2,550.00 Training Registration 26609 Lumi's 80.00 Meeting Expense 2661D McMaster-Can Supply Co. 790.65 Tools 26611 Motion Industries 228.79 Pump Supplies 26612 Orange County Family Support 498.60 Wage Garnishment 26613 Orange County Forum 35.00 Meeting Expenses 26614 Orange County Marshal 586.48 Wage Garnishment 26615 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 26616 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 26617 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 26618 Peace Officers Council of CA 792.00 Dues Deduction 26619 Postmaster 550.00 Post Office Box Rental 26620 State of California 393.28 Wage Gamishment 26821 Summit Steel 185.32 Metal 26622 The Unisource Corporation 590.87 Office Supplies 26623 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 26624 Norbert Gala 878.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26625 Charles F.Wrisor 910.52 Meeting Expense Reimb. 26626 Carrillo Engineers 82.144.53 Engineering Services-J-254 26627 City of Buena Park 58,758.50 Cooperative Projects Program Reimb.J-73 26628 Computerized Facility Integration 156,642.58 Engineering Service J-25-1 26629 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 31,923.09 (1)Dell Poweredge 6300 Server 26630 Robert F.Driver Associates 26,051.00 Boiler&Machinery&Crime Insurance Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 411100 to 4111 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26631 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 45,671.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 26632 DukeSolutions, Inc. 161,826.48 Natural Gas-Spec#170 26633 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 29,000.00 Engineering Services 2-41 26634 Kemlmn Pacific, Inc. 93,930.60 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 26635 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 55,732.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 26636 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 168,696.24 Engineering Services J42 26637 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 71.816.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 26638 Polydyne, Inc. 26.667.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 26639 Projeds Partners 83,387.78 Temporary Employment Services 26640 Statoil Energy, Inc. 151,962.70 Can Gen Engines Overhaul&Mechanical Supplies 26641 Textile Engineering Associates 31,045.08 Belt Press Supplies 26642 Tule Ranch/Magan Fanns 68.206.24 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 26643 The Yakima Company 38.647.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 26644 Ark Construction Company 79.999.92 Construction J-55 26645 Brandall Modular Corp 91,894.14 Construction J-75 26646 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,163,556.00 Construction P2-39 26647 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 98,671.00 Construction P2-61 26648 S.S.Mechanical Corp 228,621.76 Construction P-46-2&J-53 26649 Southern Contracting Company 148,684.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1 26650 Union Bank of California 25,402A2 Construction PI46-2 26651 Orange County Sanitation District 41,362.39 Workers Comp. Reimb. 26652 A-1 All American Roofing 875.00 Roof Drains Repair 26653 Great American Printing Co. 297.17 Office Supplies 26654 Advanced Drainage System 200.00 Drain Pipe 26655 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89 26656 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 244.28 Mechanical Supplies 26657 Altemative Dispute Resolution Design Group 2,800.00 Human Resources Service 26658 American Express 9,968.48 Purchasing Card Program 26659 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,600.D9 Training Materials 26660 Appleone Employment Service 4.495.06 Temporary Employment Services 26661 Artistic Blinds 640.80 Office Supplies 26662 Asbury Environmental Services 265.00 Waste Oil Removal 26663 Audio VkJw Reporting Services 38.00 Audio Video Services 26664 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 121.11 Auto Shop Supplies 26665 Awards&Trophies By Bea 43.37 Plaques 26666 AKM Consulting Engineers 12,693.21 Consulting Services 11-17-3 26667 AMSA 625.OD Meeting Registration 26668 APEX Communications 12,355.07 Computer Security Equipment&Maint. 26669 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 50.90 Telephone Service 26670 AT&T Wireless Services 467.30 Cellular Telephone Service 26671 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 26672 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 71.91 Valve Supplies Page 2 of 7 E G � Claims Paid From 4/1100 to 4116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26673 Blaze Out 401.55 Hydrostatic Testing 26674 Boyle Engineering Corporation 3,398.39 Engineering Services 3.38.1 26675 Brian Villigan 150.00 Claim Settlement-Vehicle 26676 Brilhinee Electric 882.78 Electrical Supplies 26677 California Automatic Gate 450.85 Service Agreement 26676 Calttomia Relocation Services, Inc. 303.75 Office Moving Services 26679 Calhol,Inc. 608.69 Electrical Pans&Supplies 26680 Cad R.Nelson, P.E. 940.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41 26681 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 3.925.00 Engineering Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension 26682 Charles Industries 1,405.33 Electrical Supplies 26683 Charles P.Crowley Co. 71.96 Instrument Parts 26684 ClarkLift of California.lnc. 895.00 Training Registration 26685 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 16.74 Office Supplies 26686 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 87.53 Electrical Supplies 26687 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 242.D6 Plumbing Supplies 26688 Cooper Energy Services 9,245.74 Engine Supplies 26689 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing 26690 Corporate Express 1,304.18 Office Supplies 26691 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,335.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.989M9 26692 Cost Containment Solutions 956.80 Workers Comp.Services 26693 Coslco Wholesale Membership 35.00 Membership 26694 County of Orange 157.50 Permit Fees 26695 County Wholesale Electric Co. 240.06 Electrical Supplies 26696 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 26697 CASA 800.00 Conference Registration 26698 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Conference Registration 26699 David's Tree Service 475.00 Tree Malnt.Service 26700 Diamond H Recognition 19.25 Employee Service Awards 26701 DOB Engineering,Inc. 7,072.00 Temporary Employment Services 26702 DGA Consultants,Inc. 720.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 26703 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,330.D0 Medical Screening 26704 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 26705 Environmental Resources Associates 1,421.40 Lab Supplies 267D6 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1,068.73 Software 26707 ESRI,Inc. 800.00 Training Registration 26708 FedEx Corporation 157.94 Air Freight 26709 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 151.84 Lab Supplies 26710 Fountain Valley Camera 97.23 Photo Supplies 26711 Franklin Covey 57.75 Office Supplies 26712 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 203.54 Paint Supplies 26713 Fry's Electronics 303.66 Computer Supplies 26714 FLW, Inc. 289.41 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 411100 to 4115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28715 FM International, Inc. 10,191.42 Professional Services J-25-1 26716 Gates Fiberglass Installers 2.305.85 Fiberglass Repair 26717 GTE California 3.175.35 Telephone Services 26718 George Yardley Co. 795.38 Lab Supplies 26719 WVV Grainger, Inc. 441.46 Compressor Supplies 26720 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 99.13 Janitorial Supplies 26721 Harbour Engineering Group 13.700.81 Mechanical Supplies 26722 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 877.70 Plumbing Supplies 26723 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 6 Deli 409.54 Catering Services 26724 HIM, Inc. 530.13 Tools 26725 Home Depot 422.23 Small Hardware 26726 Hopkins Technical Products 1,613.46 Pump Supplies 26727 Hunts'Final Phase 1,783.78 Construction Services-Admin. Bldg.Acoustic Modgn. 26728 I.D.Industries, Inc. 207.47 Electrical Supplies 26729 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 15.155.00 Records Management Program 26730 Imaging Plus,Inc. 3.871.40 Printing Service 28731 Industrial Metal Supply 790.21 Metal 28732 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 303.04 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 26733 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.11 Photographic Services 26734 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade 26735 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 125.54 Safety Supplies 28736 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 303.07 Instrument Supplies 26737 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 17,181.25 Construction Services-Gas Line Replacement 28738 Jays Catering 1,525.90 Catering Services 28739 Johnstone Supply 366.29 Electrical Supplies 26740 Kaman Industrial Technologies 220.90 Mechanical Supplies 26741 Kars Advance Materials, Inc. 3.857.50 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation 26742 Keenan Supply 12.946.16 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26743 Kelly Paper 899.43 Paper 28744 Knox 3,302.51 Tools 26745 Lab Support 930.00 Temporary Employment Services 26746 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 24,827.82 Engineering Consulting Services P2-39 8 P2-47-1 26747 Gerald R.Jones 4,492.87 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 26748 Line-X Protective Coatings 612.38 Tmok Supplies 26749 Makesense Utility Bill Auditors 183.96 Utility Cost Saving Service 28760 MarVac Electronics 12.81 Instrument Supplies 26751 McMaster-Cam Supply Cm 417.14 Tools 26752 Michael's Stores, Inc. 49.13 Printing Supplies 26753 Mid Cities Honda 807.05 Portable Generator 26754 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 19,785.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26755 Mission Abrasive 8 Janitorial Supplies 165.05 Tools 6 Supplies 28756 Mission Uniform Service 3,650.68 Uniform Rentals Page 4 of 7 c Claims Paid From 411100 to 4/16100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26757 Mitchell Instrument Co. 415.00 Instruments 26758 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 26759 Monster.Com 275.00 Notices 8 Ads 26760 Michael D.Moore 344.74 Meeting Expense Reimb. 26761 Nautical Software 4,507.00 Software 26762 Neal Supply Co. 228.61 Plumbing Supplies 26763 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,837.00 Training Registration 26764 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 8.076.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 26765 North American Crane Bureau, Inc. 770.00 Equipment Training Course 26766 National Environmental Balancing Bureau 98.60 Publication 26767 NETSOL/Network Solution 3.980.00 Engineering Services-Security System Improvements 26768 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,580.46 Office Supplies 26769 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 2.278.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies 26770 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 174.37 Plumbing Supplies 26771 Oxygen Service Company 1,553.16 Specialty Gases 26772 OCE-USA, Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 26773 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 784.33 Electrical Supplies 26774 Pacific Mechanical Supply 146.71 Plumbing Supplies 26775 Patriot Video Productions 822.43 Video Taping Services 26776 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,700.41 Lab Supplies 26777 Pemia Pure,Inc. 206.67 Flfter 26778 Pinnacle One 16.698.50 Legal Service 11-17-1 26779 Ponton Industries 266.58 Instrument Supplies 26780 Power Eleclro Supply Co.,Inc. 28.73 Electrical Supplies 26781 Power Lift Corporation 1,250.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training 26782 Power Systems 9.245.07 Power Bldg.3 Generator Repair 26783 Praxalr,Inc. 221.21 Lab Supplies 26784 Primary Source 4.976.72 Office Furniture 26785 Process Software Corp. 380.00 Software Maint. 26786 Quanle ra Laboratories 1,000.00 Lab Services 26787 R. L.Abbott 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services 26788 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 50.00 Trash Removal 26789 Registrar,Air&Waste Management Assoc. 689.00 Meeting Registration 26790 Reliastar 9,485.63 Employee Medical Health Premium 26791 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 139.OD Registration 26792 Rosemount Analytical, Inc. 3,211.41 Instrument Supplies 26793 RPM Electric Motors 7,316.36 Electric Motor Repair 26794 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 3,650.00 Construction-Manhole Repair 26795 Scientific Refrigeration 350.00 Refrigerator Repair 26796 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 529.20 Specialty Gases 26797 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 1,275.00 Lab Repairs 26798 City of Seal Beech 150.19 Water Use Page 5 of Claims Paid From 4/1100 to 4115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26799 Seoond-Sun 673.57 Light Fixtures 26800 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 70.D4 Tools/Hardware 26801 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 26802 Supeloo,Inc. 498.31 Lab Supplies 26803 Skater,Inc. 2,882.26 Lab Supplies 26804 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration 26805 Skylights Unlimited 1,650.00 Skylights Replacement&Removal 26806 So.Cal.Gas Company 11.182.89 Natural Gas 26807 Soce-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Supplies 26808 SoftVew Computer Products 140.87 Computer Supplies 26809 SoftChoice 1.492.35 Software 26810 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1.929.10 Permit Fees 26811 Southern California Academy of Sciences 50.00 Registration 26812 Southern California Edison 7.768.61 Power 26813 Southern California Gas Company 1,812.60 Gas Dispenser Calibration 26814 Sparklefts 1,850.48 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 26815 Special Plastic Systems, Inc. 2,739.35 Accumulators 26816 Super Chem Corporation 340.76 Chemicals 26817 The Orange County Register 885.60 Notices&Ads 26818 ThermoQuest Corporation 23.57 Lab Supplies 26819 ThermoQuesl Institute 2,495.00 Training Registration 26820 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,183.02 Mechanical Supplies 26821 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1.331.10 Elevator Maintenance 26822 Daily Pilot 225.00 Notices&Ads 28823 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 4.31 Looks&Keys 26824 Toshiba International Corporation 1,802.78 Electrical Supplies 26825 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 157.38 Truck Supplies 26826 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 510.00 Lab Services 26827 Two Wheels One Planet 478.93 Bicycle Supplies 26828 Teksystems 1,197.80 Temporary Employment Services 26829 U.S. Filler Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 26830 U.S.Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage 26831 United Asset Coverage, Inc. 24,820.00 Phone System Maint. 26832 United Parcel Service 87.20 Parcel Services 26833 Utilities Division,Nat'l Safety Council 175.00 Registration 26834 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,433.10 Plumbing Supplies 26835 Village Nurseries 48.49 Landscaping Supplies 26836 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.388.32 Vision Service Premium 26837 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,649.84 Lab Supplies 26838 The Wackenhut Corporation 3.075.78 Security Guards 26839 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 29.98 Electrical Supplies 26840 Western Business Systems 358.40 Office Supplies Page 6 of 7 0 G Claims Paid From 411/00 to 4115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26841 Western States Chemical, Inc. 15,648.81 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 26842 Xerox Corporation 5,010.53 Copier Leases 26843 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 21324 Publication 26844 Mleden Gmavac Construction Co. 17,961.00 Construction 7-28 26845 Robert P.Ghirelli 541.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26846 LKevin Hadden 472.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb, 26847 Deborah L. Lindel 1.348.03 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26848 Donald F. McIntyre 1,171.06 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26849 Douglas M.Stewart 513.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 28850 Daniel R.Tremblay 1,286.96 MeetingRraining Expense Reimb. 26851 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 510.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 26852 Janice Debay 775.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 28853 Orange County Sanitation District 541.86 Petty Cash Reimb. 26854 Robert C.Thompson 1.815.38 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,303,771.56 Payroll Disbursements 18678- 18817 Employee Paychecks $ 157,923.86 Biweekly Payroll 4/5/00 18818- 18822 Employee Paychecks 12,003.43 Termination&Adjustment 47863-48307 Direct Deposit Statements 656,437.82 Biweekly Payroll 415/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 826.365.11 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148.532.50 March Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 225,547.28 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 190,445.33 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 564.525.11 Total Claims Paid 411/00-4115100 S 5,694,661.78 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 4116/00 to 4130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 26855 Orange County Sanitation District $ 417,990.88 Payroll EFT Retrnbursement 26856 Woodruff,Spredlin 8 Smart 47,070.98 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 26857 Air Products 8 Chemicals 21,441,13 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 11-8-89 26858 American Society of Safety Engineers I 1.444.82 Training Registration 8 Supplies 26859 Voided Check - - 26860 AIHI 1,221.50 Training Supplies 26861 The Assoc.of Records Managers 8 Admin. 645.00 Registration 26862 American Telephone 6 Telegraph Corp. 48.91 Telephone Service 26863 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 26864 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 26865 Court Order 587.W Wage Garnishment 26866 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 190.57 Electrical Supplies 26867 CASA 200.00 Conference Registration 26868 Court Older 741.50 Wage Garnishment 26869 Franchise Tax Board 278.27 Wage Garnishment 26870 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 26871 Fry's Electronics 16.15 Computer Supplies 26872 GTE California 1.261.13 Telephone Services 26873 Graseby S.T.I. 2.219.19 Engine Supplies 28874 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 118.65 Compressor Parts 26076 Information Resources 435.00 Human Resources Service 26876 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,369.45 Dues Deduction 26877 Wine Ranch Water District 1.981.14 Water Use 26878 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 26879 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 26880 Line-X Protective Coatings 337.38 Truck Supplies 26881 Luccfs 55.00 Meeting Expense 26882 Matthew And Stewart Co.,Inc. 11,835.32 Construction 11-23 26883 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 130.71 Tools 28884 Millennium Associates 345.85 Training Supplies 26885 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 26886 National Fire Protection Association 878.59 Safety Supplies 26887 National Seminars Group 139.00 Training Registration 26888 Voided Check - - 26889 Office Depot Business Services Div. 27.35 Office Supplies 26890 Orange County Family Support 473.50 Wage Garnishment 26891 Orange County Marshal 622.12 Wage Garnishment 26892 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction 26893 Pacific Bell 30.68 Telephone Services 26894 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 800.00 Electrical Supplies 26895 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 2689E Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 26897 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 26898 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1.641.91 Tools/Hardware Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 4/16100 to 4130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26899 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group&Transfer$1,000 26900 So.Cal.Gas Company 12,563.67 Natural Gas 26901 State of California 46,43 Wage Garnishment 26902 State Board of Equalization 479.87 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 26903 Summit Steel 744.51 Metal 26904 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 26905 Superintendent of Documents 1Z00 Software 2690E Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,041.24 Mechanical Supplies 26907 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,509.29 Truck Supplies 26908 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 26909 Layne T.Baroldi 253.22 Publication Reimb. 26910 Jeffrey L. Petersen 163A2 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26911 WEF-Registration Dept. 565.00 Registration 26912 Alden,Systems,Inc. 56,480.00 Professional Services-Network Labeling&Documentation 26913 Commercial Resources Taz Group 250,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. 26914 Computational Systems,Inc.(CSU 63.442.62 Video Data Collector Computer System 26915 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42.351.76 4 Dell Servers 26916 Delta Dental 41,178.64 Dental Insurance Plan 26917 Kemiron Pacific,Inc 73,673.00 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 26918 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 25,449.29 Lubricant/Diesal Fuel 26919 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 84,658.57 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 26920 Southern California Edison 45,883.54 Power 26921 Tute Ranch/Magan Farms 96,130.80 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 26922 Vulcan 127.104.18 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 26923 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 148,680.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R 26924 Fleming Engineering,Inc 464,965.30 Construction 3J8.1 26925 Ken Thompson, Inc. 588,676.88 Construction 11-17-3 26926 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 142,916.00 Consbuclion 2-34 26927 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 1,289,233.21 Construction PI-38S, P2-35-3,P2-46&P2.55 26928 Union Bank of California 64,171.20 Construction 11-17-3 26929 Union Bank of California 51.662.81 Construction 3-38-1 26930 West-Tech Contracting, Inc 44,280.00 Construction SP19990065 26931 Aceugte Fasteners 57.07 Tool Supplies 26932 Great American Printing Co. 199.69 Office Supplies 269W Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,389.32 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 26934 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies 28935 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 3,578.38 Manhole Frames&Covers 26936 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 26937 Appleone Employment Service 7,728.85 Temporary Employment Services 26938 Applied Industrial Technology 149.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies 26939 Arous Data Security 106.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 26940 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 507.00 Vacuum Truck Services 26941 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal 26942 Awards It Trophies By Bea 335.48 Plaques 26943 Accent Awnings 85.00 Service Agreement Page 2 of 7 0 .. Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26944 ACGIH Woddvnde 984.00 Safety Publications 26945 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 3,600.00 Professional Services-Flow Monitoring Project 26946 American Industrial Hygiene Conference 1.300.00 Training Registration 26947 American Telephone 5 Telegraph Corp. 394.51 Telephone Service 26948 American Telephone 5 Telegraph Corp. 152.63 Telephone Service 26949 AWSI 33.00 Department ofTrensportation Training Program 26950 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 3,189.38 Telephone Equipment Service 26951 Battery Specialties 603.52 Batteries 26952 Boyle Engineering Corporation 6,193.88 Engineering Services 7-23-1 26953 Brady Corporation 325.21 Tools 26954 Brinderson Corp. 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service 26955 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc. 252.70 Service Agreement 26956 Caltrol,Inc. 387.90 Electrical Parts 5 Supplies 26957 Carollo Engineers 170.10 Professional Services-Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study 26958 Clayton Group Services,Ina 3,328.96 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 26959 Coast Fire Equipment 1.402.14 Service Agreement 26960 Voided Chock - - 26961 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 8,800.0D Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants 26962 Consolidated Elect- Distributors, Inc. 6,878.07 Electrical Supplies 26963 Cooper Energy Services 4,410,23 Engine Supplies 26964 Corporate Express 455.02 Office Supplies 28965 Cost Containment Solutions 2.539.05 Worker's Comp.Services 26966 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,355.53 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 26967 County Wholesale Electric Co. 9,730.57 Electrical Supplies 26968 Crane America Services,Ina 6.981.14 Crane Services 26969 Culligan of Orange County 95.70 Soft Water Service 26970 CRM Films 21&00 Training Video 26971 CWFA Membership 110.00 Membership 26972 CWEA-20DO California Bioeolids Training 77.00 Registration 26973 Del Met Analytical 1.326.00 Blosollds Analysis 26974 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1.211.18 Paint Supplies 26975 DOB Engineering, Ina 4,400.00 Temporary Employment Services 26976 DGA Consultants.Inc. 1,005.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 26977 DMG-Maximus 3,800.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan 26978 E.G.Hollers Son,Inc. 68.24 Electrical Supplies 26979 Emergency Management Network, Inc 6,500.00 Training Registration 26980 Enchanter, Inc. 2.100.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 26981 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 1,880.16 Consulting Services-FIS Support 26982 Excel Visual Communications 459.76 Training Supplies 26983 Faxpress,Inc. 914.15 Office Supplies 26984 Filter Supply Company 443.73 Filters 26985 First American Real Estate Solutions 148.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription 26986 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 2,778A7 Lab Supplies 26987 Flo-Systems,Inc. 8,668.73 Pump Supplies 26988 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,982.02 Lap Term Disability Ins.Premium Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4/30100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26989 Fountain Valley Camara 81.34 Photo Supplies 26990 Franklin Covey 130.63 Office Supplies 26991 Frys Electronics 389.84 Computer Supplies 26992 FOCUS 2000 Registration 945.00 Training Registration 26993 G.E.Supply 2,479.10 Electric Parts 26994 Genad-Callahan Company 150.85 Chemicals 26995 GTE California 3,308.22 Telephone Services 26998 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Supplies 26997 Goldenwest Window Service 1,844.D0 Window Cleaning Service 26998 WJJ Grainger,Inc. 492.23 Compressor Supplies 26998 GTE 6,449.50 Telephone Services 27000 Hanker Equipment Company 195.06 Truck Supplies 27001 Harper&Associates Engineering,Inc. 500.OD Electrical Supplies 27002 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 5,388.22 Engine Generator Control Supplies 27003 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 11,909.04 Engineering Service P1-44-4 27004 Home Appliance 428.85 Electrical Supplies 270D5 Home Depot 389.07 Small Hardware 27006 Horizon High Reach 7,696.01 Forklift Transmission Repair 27007 City of Huntington Beach 14,450.73 Water Use 27008 Hunts'Final Phase 7,626.00 Miw.Construction Services-Hwks"B"Enclosure 27009 HI Standard Automotive 1,686.12 Automotive Supplies 27010 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 11,160.00 Records Management Program 27011 Industrial Metal Supply 646.12 Metal 27012 Interstate Battery Systems 740.56 Batteries 27013 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.40 Water Use 27014 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 27015 Airline Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 440.60 Safety Supplies 27016 J.O'Brien Company, Inc. 998.10 Computer Supplies 27017 J.P.Morgan Sewnties,Inc. 21,432.24 ' COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 27018 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3,190.40 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation&Manhole Repair 27019 K.P. Undstrom,Inc. 15,250.00 Environmental Committing Services MO 12-9-90 27020 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,987.96 Medical Insurance Premium 27021 Karen Monaca&Associates 6,062.50 FIS Support Services 27022 Kelly Paper 1.562.09 Paper 27023 Kerry Consulting Group 1,85728 Professional Services MO 11-15-95 27024 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,768.88 Tools 27025 Lee&Ro, Inc 14,539.54 Engineering Consulting Services J47 27026 Liebert Cassidy 2,092.60 Professional Service-Human Resources 27027 Mine Safety Appliances 1,744.90 Elecilml Supplies 27028 Maintenance Technology Corp. 81.19 Mechanical Supplies 27029 Mamw International 138.70 Janitorial Supplies 27030 Management Action Programs,Inc. 1,100.01) Training Registration 27031 Mail Chlor,Inc. 3,020.81 Electrical Supplies 27032 Me Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1,140.11 Plumbing Supplies 27033 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,239.62 Tools Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 27034 Medlin Controls Co. 2.766.62 Instrument Supplies 27035 Microwave Specialties 142.00 Microwave Oven Supplies 27036 Mid-West Associates 24,802.14 Pump Supplies 27037 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 17.622.45 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 27038 Millimmics GO RMB Engineering 1,470.79 Electrical Supplies 27039 Mission Uniform Service 3,382.73 Uniform Rentals 27040 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 270.03 Engineering Service 541-1 27041 National Institute of Bids&Technology 743.00 Lab Supplies 27042 National Meorocemp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 27043 National Plant Services,Inc. 7,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services 27044 National Safety Council 716.40 Safety Supplies 27045 Neal Supply Co. 512.14 Plumbing Supplies 27046 Network Construction Services 1,148.90 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project 27047 Network Generations, Inc. 2.337.40 Computer Supplies 27048 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,866.00 Training Registration 27049 City of Newport Beach 46.61 Water Use 27050 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mail Delivery Service 27051 North American Crane Bureau 1,485.00 Training Registration 27052 Office Of County Counsel,County of Kem 6.557.10 Legal Service-LACSDM 2 v. County of Kam 27063 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,020.03 Office Supplies 27054 Oxygen Service Company 2,880.10 Specialty Gases 27055 OCB Reprographics 3,495.30 Printing Service-Spec P-173 27056 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 49.78 Electrical Supplies 27057 Pacific Bell 1.108.14 Telephone Services 27058 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 27059 Pacific Mechanical Supply 16.79 Plumbing Supplies 27060 Pacific Pads and Controls, Inc. 1,428.10 Electrical Supplies 27061 Pagenet 1,920.82 Paging Services 27062 Parker Supply Company 7.988.96 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 27063 Parts Unlimited 359.67 Truck Supplies 27064 Pickens Fuel Corp. 4,495.78 Professional Service-CNG Program 27065 Polydyne,Inc. 15,133.50 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 27065 Precise Sensor,Inc. 1,003.08 Can Gen Engine Supplies 27067 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admen. 27068 Process Equipment Company 1,397.55 Pump Supplies 27069 Pryor Resources, Inc. 2,900.00 Training Registration 27070 Pump Engineering&/or O Air 678.39 Compressor Supplies 27071 Ouanlems Environmental Services 1.378.00 Lab Analytical Service 27072 R&R Instrumentation.Inc. 883.91 Instrument Supplies 27073 Randolph Austin Co. 646.39 Plumbing Supplies 27074 Red Wing Shoes 164.64 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 27075 Reliestar 22.505.56 Employee Medical Health Premium 27076 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,309.46 Life Insurance Premium 27077 Robert's Auto Trim Shop 657.71 Auto Repair 27078 Rosemount Analytical,Inc. 1,361.81 Instrument Supplies Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 27079 Rosemount Measurement, Inc. 401.90 Instrument Supplies 27080 RJN Group,Inc. 5,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 27081 RMS Engineering&Design,Ina 1,000.00 Engineering Services-Crane System Support 27082 RPM Electric Motors 1,039.87 Elecric Motor Repair 27083 Safety-Meen 11,805.50 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 27084 Safetycare,Inc. 474.10 Safety Supplies 27085 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 6,450.00 Construction-Wet Well&Manhole Repair 27086 Santa Fe Indusrial Products,Inc. 661.35 Mechanical Supplies 27087 Schwing America,Inc. 7,953.32 Pump Supplies 27088 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 7,693.42 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 27089 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 5,807.86 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 27090 Second-Sun 395.87 Light Fixtures 27091 Shamrock Supply Co.,Ina 83.25 Tools 27092 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,323.19 Tools/Hardware 27093 Supelce,Inc. 2,861.00 Lab Supplies 27094 SoftView Computer Products 127.55 Computer Supplies 27095 SoftChoice 1,030.78 Software 27096 Southern California Gas Company 750.00 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 27097 Sparkle8s 2,020.46 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 27098 Spex Cedprep,Inc. 451.20 Lab Supplies 27099 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 79.95 Pump Supplies 27100 Staloil Energy, Inc. 3,355.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 27101 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 205.25 Office Supplies 27102 Subscription Services,AOMD 215.54 Publication 27103 Summit Steel 498.49 Metal 27104 Sunset Ford 302.16 Vehicle Supplies 27105 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,348.68 Mechanical Supplies 27106 Super Chem Corporation 668.05 Chemicals 27107 Saft America 2,250.00 Batteries 27108 SKC-West, Inc. 860.08 Safety Supplies 27109 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 68.71 Electric Can Parts 27110 ThermoOuest Corporation 1,296.84 Lab Supplies 27111 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 450.00 Biosolids Analysis 27112 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 483.51 Mechanical Supplies 27113 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 20.24 Locks&Keys 27114 Traffic Control Service,Ina 25.64 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 27116 Trident Data Systems 20,300.00 Computer Service&Supplies 27116 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 135.66 Truck Supplies 27117 Teksystems 1.097.00 Temporary Employment Services 27118 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Service Agreement 27119 Ultra Scientific a20.50 Lab Supplies 27120 Undersea Graphics, Inc. 19,250.00 Contract Service-Outfall Inspection 27121 Union Bank of Califomla 1,414.32 Banking Services 27122 United Parcel Service 379.90 Parcel Services 27123 University of Southern California 6,500.00 Professional Service Reimb.-Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Page 6 of 7 ` Claims Paid From 4/16/00 to 4130/00 F Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 27124 UC Riverside 5.000.00 Professional Service-Biotdckling Filter Teat 27125 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 4.235.66 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 27126 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,134,58 Plumbing Supplies 27127 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5.120.00 Consulting Services-Parametric Emissions Monitoring System 27128 Veme's Plumbing I 1,030.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 27129 VCI Mechanical 41.20 Office Supplies 27130 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8,360.00 Lab Supplies 27131 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,230.34 Security Guards 27132 Wayne Electric Co. 96.92 Electrical Supplies 27133 Western States Chemical,Inc. 7.805.83 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 27134 Weston Pringle 4,705.00 Professional Services-Kem County Traffic 27135 Wastrux International 49.05 Truck Supplies 27138 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc. 315.74 Electrical Equipment Repair 27137 Wordware Publishing,Inc. 64.90 Publication ' 27138 Wyatt Data Services 299.00 Publication 27139 Xerox Corporation 2,596.75 Copier Leases 27140 The Yakima Company 15,082.63 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 27141 201h Century Plastics, Inc. 98.07 Office Supplies 27142 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 20,402.00 Construction 7.28 27143 Union Bank of California 16,520.00 Construction 3-35R 27144 Liss Arosneguy 513.89 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb. 27145 Layne T. Baroldi 101.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 27146 Penick B.Carnahan 874.63 Masting/7raining Expense Reimb. 27147 Samuel L. Mowbrsy 512.35 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb. 27148 Simon L.Watson 516.92 MeetingRroining Expense Reimb. 27149 Michael J.McCusker 2,029.60 Employee Computer Loan Program 27150 Orange County Sanitation District 54.85 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.952.251.98 Payroll Disbursements 18a23-18943 Employee Paychecks $ 160,259.88 Biweekly Payroll 4/19/00 18944-18947 Employee Paychecks 2,613.24 Termination 8 Adjustments 48308.48746 Direct Deposit Statements W9,357.16 Biveekly Payroll 4119100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 832,230.26 Total Claims Paid 4/16100-4130100 $ 5,794,492.22 Page 7 of 7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dace I TOBA.Dr DIr. 05/24/00 AGENDA REPORT RemNumbe Iem (al mur Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RE MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract, filed by Mladen Buntich Construction Company (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000005719) in connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo from General Counsel dated May 17, 2000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from General Counsel dated May 17, 2000. \lntlanWblMq.ElalapenEalSoand IgeMa Redonda V BaN Agenda R@Wft NIwn t0(a).E¢ RMW. dM08 i DRAFT INUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETIN Wednesday, April 26, 2000 ' A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Pat McGuigan, Chair pro tem and Chair, OMTS Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Committee Ryal Wheeler Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: Jim Silva, County Supervisor Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Peer Swan, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Mike Moore, ECM Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Pet McGuigan was appointed Chair pro tern because of the absence of Directors Debay and Swan. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the Regular March 22 and Adjourned April 3, 2000 meetings of the Steering were approved as drafted. Director McGuigan abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. Minutes of the Steering Committee K,.. Page 2 April 26, 2000 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the negotiations with the City of Brea on connection fee waivers for Bexley Neighborhood properties currently on septic tanks. Director Daucher has now suggested a compromise of a loan, or lien, against the property in the amount of$3,000. Staff will prepare several alternatives for terms and conditions for the loans for presentation to the FAHR Committee. Supervisor Silva asked that some type of interest be assessed. General Counsel Tom Woodruff indicated that a loan program is allowed by the Special District Act. Mr. McIntyre will notify Brea and the County that this will be presented to our Directors for consideration. Agenda Item (9)A.will be removed from the agenda. Senator Polanco has pulled his bill from consideration; however, he has committed to reintroduce the bill next session after the state-wide EIR has been adopted. Jim Herberg discussed the most recent meeting with the City of Huntington Beach and the State Fish and Game Department regarding landscaping at Plant 2. A go-ahead was given to begin design with an advisory committee formed to review it. Mr. McIntyre indicated that an item would be added to the Board agenda, requesting approval of the MOU with the County of Orange on urban runoff, which outlines the District's responsibilities and fair share of costs. (n REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson reported on the activities of the Little Hoover Commission, which is currently looking at special districts' governance,public authority, reserves and revenues. A report is due this week and staff will analyze the findings and report to the Directors. The Rebuild America program is also working with public agencies, but is looking at the longer view of Infrastructure needs. One may balance the other. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff Indicated that the Court has denied a writ filed by an employee. He updated the members on the activities regarding the Kern County biosolids lawsuit. The State's office of Planning and Research has determined that Kern County shall be the lead agency for the CEOA documentation related to Yakima's Class A biosolids processing facilities. However, he also mentioned that Yakima has withdrawn its application for the facilities for a number of reasons. Emilio Ariston, an employee who is challenging a problem solving decision, may address the Board. Blake Anderson met with him, and Indicated that he is free to address the Board, but that there is no administrative recourse at this point in the process. (9) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-F) A. Resolution in Support of Senate Bill 1956 (Polanco). This item was pulled from the agenda. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 April 26, 2000 B. Urban Runoff/Coastal Remediation Action Plan. Robert Ghirelli reported that this item is on the Board agenda. A request for an additional $160,000 of funding for the District's share of Phase 2 studies has been received from Huntington Beach. Staff is in the process of evaluating this request to verity the District's share. The status of the diversion of urban runoff flows from Huntington Beach was discussed. There are now nine pump stations diverting flow to the District. So far our ocean discharge permit limits have not been exceeded by this practice. Staff will continue to monitor the early affects of this practice. Director Eckenrode expressed concern about making sure all of the affected parties are involved in the discussions. At a presentation put on by the County, there was no mention of the Sanitation District's role. Director Silva indicated that he would be asking one County staffer to be assigned as lead for this program. The first stage is to determine the source and the second stage will be a cooperative program to remedy the problem. Staff will present Its recommendations on the request for additional funding to the OMTS and FAHR Committees. C. Changes to Standard Agreement Form for Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73. Jim Herberg discussed proposed changes to the form of agreement for these projects as a result of a letter request from the City of Huntington Beach for verification that all of the District's funding is from local sources. The City may be requesting matching funds from the federal government. It was moved, seconded and approved to incorporate the following into the Cooperative Projects Program agreements: (1) Require the local agencies to reimburse the District for costs incurred by the District, including costs for financial audits, resulting from local agency participation in state and federal matching fund programs; and (2) Require local agency project funding to match that of the District's,dollar- for-dollar, regardless of state and federal grant or loan participation. D. US Bureau of Reclamatlon/Southem California Recycling Projects Initiative. Jim Herberg reported on the District's participation in this program. The Bureau is seeking interested agencies as partners to share in the costs and by doing so would allow the District membership on the Executive Management Team, which is responsible for the overall direction of the program. Costs would depend on the number of partners and should be known by June. Staff was directed to forward the information to the GW RS Joint Coordinating Committee at its next meeting and report back to the Steering Committee in May. E. What has the EMT done since its January Retreat? Transition Plan Blake Anderson, in an effort to make an orderly transition,described where the EMT is,where it wants to be and how it plans to get there. He described the steps taken to date, including the management training (conducted by a firm called MAP)for all EMT members and division managers and the EMT retreat in January. Management has been establishing expectations for the next budget, a Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 April 26, 2000 achieving alignment through the vision and mission statements for departments and divisions, developing operating philosophies using the basic MAP tools for setting goals. Staff is working on a five-year staffing plan, which will consider each division as a separate business unit, developing goals and objectives and staffing requirements to meet those goals. Macro issues that may impact all departments are being developed so that they may be considered during the development of the five-year staffing plan and work plans. An issues list that was a result of the EMT Retreat will be considered by an Operational Organization Committee in attempt to prioritize the items and fix those things that need fixing. F. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in May . The OMTS Committee agenda will include a tour of the lab and the PDC Committee will meet at Plant 2 to tour several of the sites of future projects. Several items listed for review by the OMTS Committee have been removed from the agenda. (9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Don McIntyre reported that representatives from Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch were at the District last week for presentations prior to their determining a rating for our finance offerings. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May 24,2000 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for May 24, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 April 26, 2000 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. S bmitted by, V a J a appan ring Committee Secretary N Iry OBIdMyISrEFRING COMMt2600$L NnufBtOx Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 April 26, 2000 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. S bmitted by; Q J a appan Stebring Committee Secretary NIq.ObNppgaISTEE/1/N000MNIITEEVpIM,WIOIMW SL NiwluWv' DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2000—5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 3, 2000, in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake P. Anderson, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Jan Debay, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Peter Green Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Joy Neugebauer Gary Streed, Director of Finance Anna Piercy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Kenneth Blake Barbara Collins, Senior Analyst Mike Moore, ECM Manager Directors Absent: Jim Colston, Regulatory Specialist Richard Castillon, IT Manager Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Mike White, Controller Simon Watson, O&M Maintenance Manager Others Present: Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Manager Toby Weissert Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the April 5, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. Directors Jan Debay and Kenneth Blake abstained. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 May 3, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair gave no report (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson reported on the Little Hoover Commission's report that was released earlier that day. The report discusses special districts within the state of California, citing excessive reserves and inefficiencies. An executive summary of the report was distributed to the Directors. Some of the generalized findings of the Commission's report, which deal with observations of over 4000 special districts in California, are of concern to this District, even though they don't apply to our policies and practices. Namely the invisibility of some special districts to the public, policymakers lack the analytical tools to overcome the status quo, some special districts having banked multi-million dollar reserves without supporting the practice with a well thought-out policy, and property tax allocations to some districts distort the true cost of services. Obviously, generalizations like these cannot be equally applied to every special district, and in particular, ours. For this reason, staff will respond to the Commission's report in the form of a white paper that will be provided to the Board at a future meefing. Mr. Anderson stated the chairman of the Little Hoover Commission would be making a presentation on this report at the CASA meeting, which is being held in Rancho Bemardo May 4 to May 6. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, was recognized. She received a phone call from the Orange County Registers correspondent in Sacramento. The reporter asked about excessive reserves in Revenue Areas 2 and 3. The reporter had incorrect data stating each of the revenue areas had in excess of$200 million in reserves each. One of the reporters questions was why OCSD wasn't doing more to inform the public of the District's finances. Michelle directed the reporter to the District's web site, which has the executive summary of this years budget. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance had no report (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, updated the Directors on the investigation of last years beach closures in Huntington Beach. A series of tests began recently which will include two dye studies. The city of Huntington Beach is the lead agency for this testing program, with support from the County of Orange and OCSD. Approximately$500,000 will be spent on these and other studies to improve our understanding about how the water moves through the drainage channels into the ocean. ` Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance _ and Technical Services Committee o Page 3 May 3, 2000 Mike Moore, Environmental Compliance &Monitoring Manager, gave a brief update on biosolids issues. The potential purchase of the Yakima composting site in Kern County has been cancelled. The Tule Ranch purchase in Kings County is still in escrow and should be closed by the end of the month. Upon the close of escrow staff will be looking at some site improvements at the front portion of the site to make this facility a showcase; the plans will be brought back before the Directors for review. Mr. Moore also reported that Senator Polance pulled SB 1956 because it was thought there would not be sufficient votes to get the bill through the Senate Environment committee. This bill limits the discretionary authority counties can exercise in establishing ordinance requirements on biosolids that are more restrictive than state or federal requirements. Senator Polanco has committed to the sponsors (City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sanitation District)that the bill would be reintroduced after the November election. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a- d) a. OMTSOO-08: Award a sole source purchase order to Villa Ford of Orange for a 36- month closed-end lease for three EV Ranger compact pickup trucks for a total amount not to exceed $47,136.32 including all taxes and fees. Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Manager, gave a brief report on the lease of three electrical-powered vehicles. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. b. OMTSOO.09: Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for Purchase of Storage Area Network, Specification No. E-277, in connection with the Computerized Facility Atlas and Document Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, to upgrade a portion of the District's networking infrastructure, for a total amount not to exceed$281,643.85. Rich Castillon, IT Manager, gave a brief report on the proposed upgrading of the District's networking infrastructure. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. C. OMTSOO-10: Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales, maintenance costs of$900 per month, and$90 per hour for emergency maintenance services, effective July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in a form approved by General Counsel. Mark Esquer gave a detailed report on the current agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee 4 Page 4 May 3, 2000 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. d. OMTSOO-11: 1)Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty repair on eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a total project budget cost not to exceed $150,000; and 2)Authorize staff to award a sole source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services, Inc. for warranty repair work to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total amount not to exceed $150,000. Simon Watson updated the Directors on the repair of central generation engines. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-c) a. OMTSOO-12 Legislative Update Jim Colston updated the Directors on current legislation affecting the District. b. OMTSOO-13 Tour of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory and Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) Sam Mowbray gave a tour of the District's laboratory prior to the commencement of the OMTS Committee Meeting. C. OMTSOO-14 2000-2001 Budget Summaries Gary Streed gave a brief overview of the 2000-20001 budget summaries. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Directors requested to receive a monthly update on the Huntington Beach investigations. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee { Page 5 May 3, 2000 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for June 7, 2000 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. M e Operations, aintena and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\wp.dta\aBenda\OMTS\20WWinu w\05030o Minutes Eoc OMTSCOMMITTEE Meenn90a[e TueG.orgr. 05103/7A00 05/34/00 AGENDA REPORT I"Numbc Rem Nu)mber Orange County Sanitation District OMr500-09 13( FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Richard Castillon, Manager SUBJECT: E-277 PURCHASE DELL STORAGE AREA NETWORK GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for Purchase of Storage Area Network(Specification No. E-277) to upgrade a portion of the District's networking infrastructure in connection with Computerized Facility Atlas and Document Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85 SUMMARY The Information Technology(IT) Department has evaluated specific District needs for ongoing server and storage requirements. New technology projects such as the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) and the Facilities Atlas require the purchase of several servers, based on our current standard. The extremely high computing demands of these applications require computing systems that are both flexible and expandable. As a result, IT has determined that the Dell Computer Storage Area Network (SAN) is the best solution for the District's growing needs. This purchase will be the initial step to resolve disk management issues and is the beginning of an agency-wide plan to re-invent our server architecture strategy. A shift in the use of technology to address business needs is resulting in an exponential growth in data processing and storage requirements. This shift in our business process results in a move from our current multiple application server strategy to a data center strategy. The Dell SAN solution makes all this possible and ensures that the systems we purchase today are not inadequate tomorrow. Dell is the current OCSD standard for all desktop computers, laptop computers and servers, and a member of the California Mutual Awards Schedule (CMAS) program. The CMAS program establishes agreements with those manufacturers/suppliers that offer products and/or services which are currently on an existing multiple award schedule with the Federal General Services Administration (GSA) or other approved multiple award contract. Contractors, such as Dell, offer products and/or services and prices from an already existing competitively assessed, cost compared, multiple award contract. The CMAS program then adds California contract terms and conditions, ordering procedures, and California procurement codes, policies and guidelines. All items will be purchased through the CMAS program to take advantage of Dell's aggressively priced solutions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff recommends awarding a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation, for the purchase of a Storage Area Network (Specification No. E-277) to upgrade a portion of the District's networking infrastructure in connection with Computerized Facility Atlas and Document Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85. RM. Warn MN n«r.s¢ w Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Various) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Dell SAN solution was selected for the following reasons: ♦ The Dell Server is the current OCSD standard ♦ Dell is part of the California Mutual Awards Agreement(CMAS) program with aggressively priced solutions (CMAS# 3-99-00-0167C) ♦ Dell is a direct seller(no middle man) ♦ The SAN solution allows disk spare to be configured to individual server and system requirements. ♦ Up to six servers can be backed up from a single source using the identical tape resources. ♦ According to the Gartner Group, Dell is one of only four Enterprise Tier 1 vendors (Major corporations with proven resources and longevity to support major networks) ♦ Dell has a history of providing support, service, and longevity ♦ There are currently Dell SAN/Fiber Channel deployments at ♦ Orange County Sheriff Department(mission critical 911 system) ♦ Maricopa County ♦ Nevada Department of Transportation (GIS database) • Dell offers a single source major Support Vendor in IBM Global Solutions with • A guaranteed 4 hour response time • Local spare parts stocking • Dell offers manufacture's on-line remote support and troubleshooting • Five year maintenance plans are available guaranteeing non-obsolescence ♦ Pre and Post sales configuration consulting is available free of charge ♦ This solution provides better management of rapidly changing data expansion requirements and system resources usage ♦ The fiber channel solution allows a central data backup source that saves dramatically on backup tapes and resource efforts ♦ The SAN solution addresses concerns for space constraints. Purchasing six conventional servers would take the space of 3 full size server cabinets. There is no space available for a conventional plan. The SAN solution takes 1-%cabinets and will use existing space. ALTERNATIVES Continue purchasing and managing multiple single servers for each project or as resource needs change. Locate an additional computer room and peripherals to house additional servers. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A FM UIDb 1074 R. waoao Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE M22S6/na C TOB 'D". 05�03/OB BB/29/OB AGENDA REPORT IDem Number Ihm Number _ orals oB-lo 13 rm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Originator: Barbara Collins, Senior Analyst SUBJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, CONTRACT RENEWAL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales, maintenance costs of$900 per month, and $90 per hour for emergency maintenance services, effective July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY The District's CNG facilities were operational in April 1999. The CNG facilities consist of two fueling islands, one compressor facility and appurtenances. The District contracted with Pickens Fuel Corporation in January 1999 to perform maintenance as well as to operate/administer the retail business on behalf of the District. (This work also includes issuing of fuel cards, invoicing and collection.) The OMTS Committee recommended, and the District Board of Directors approved, an extension of this contract in November 1999 until June 30, 2000. Staff is proposing to continue the relationship with Pickens and award a one-year contract. The scope of services contained in this contract include scheduled preventive maintenance, call out service for emergency maintenance (24 hour on-call), and administration of the station as a retail outlet. In addition, the contract has provisions for conducting repairs and major maintenance in accordance with a fee schedule. The scope of work is the same as the previous agreement except emergency maintenance has increased from $75 to $90 per hour. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Under the terms of the contract for the operation and maintenance of the station, the payment fees for services provided are: Service Cost Monthly scheduled maintenance $900/ Month Emergency call-out maintenance Labor $901 Hour Ma'or maintenance and repairs As Needed Administrative/0 rational fee $0.101 Gallon Labor per hour based on fee schedule M:MmdWw�Aq�R�M Agmda Rwub�tslm.aoc emue Page 1 Pickens Fuel Corporation is currently the only provider of inclusive services to CNG stations in the Southern California area. District staff is also talking with the Southern California Gas Company in order to develop a second option for providing these services. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff recommends hiring Pickens Fuel Corporation for one year under the terms of service listed in the table above. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem:se) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The CNG station was built with two grants from the AOMD at a cost of approximately $1.4 million.The public CNG station has been operational since April 1999. The station received limited use until December 1999. In December 1999, the volume of fuel sold increased to approximately 1,800 gallons, and proceeds offset the expenses for routine maintenance of the station and OCSD received its first payment from Pickens. Since December, sales have steadily increased. The largest increase resulted when the John Wayne Airport awarded American Taxi an exclusive contract for the airport facilities. American Taxi uses compressed natural gas vehicles and is OCSD's largest customer. Sales following the change in contracts escalated during March to 8,543 gallons. (See table below.) Month Gallons Dispensed Total sales Operating Costs December 1795 $1654.68 $2093.71 January 2,505 $2330.60 $2643.73 February 3,928 $3898.52 $3770.08 March 8 543 $9447.80 $7056.66 The proforma completed in November 1998 indicated that when average monthly sales equaled 25,000 gallons in approximately six to seven years, the station would pay for itself. The biosolids hauling trucks, behind schedule because of project delays, are projected to begin fueling at OCSD in May. According to proforma analysis, sales should double when this occurs. CNG usage from biosolids hauling trucks will increase sales faster than the original proforma analysis projected. M ww nasal.a.wd.vmo eo.ie ac..e.aewavfwan.m itm eon R«tea ermAa Page 2 ALTERNATIVES v None CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Chart — CNG Sales and Operating Costs BAC:pjm R.��M Home Rew+euawseem Ao a ReoemmaoRe.+xm.ae� R. ermm Page 3 K r � r CNG Sales and Operating Costs $25,000.00 $23,200 When sales equal $23,200, the station will recover capital costs. According to the original proforma, $20,000.00 this will occur in six to seven years. $15,000.00 Total Sales $10,000.00 $9,447.80 10, 11, / $7,056.66 $5,000.00 $3,770.08 / $2,643.73 / Total Operating Costs $2,093.71 898.52 30.60 $1,654.68 December January February March Note: Facility cost excludes depreciation of capital assets. OMTS COMMITTEE MWing Date Tosd.ofar. 05/03/2000 05/29/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number IMMNumber orats0g-tt t3rl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Simon Watson, 0 & M Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: CONNECTING ROD WARRANTY REPAIR ON THE CENTRAL GENERATION ENGINES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty repair on eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a total project budget cost not to exceed $150,000; and 2) Authorize staff to award a sole source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services, Inc. for warranty repair work to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total amount not to exceed $150,000. SUMMARY The District is faced with a decision on the long-term maintenance of the eight Center Power Generation Engines. In 1997 the engine supplier notified the District that the rods in the engines the same model used by the District were experiencing rod failures. Cooper Energy Services, the engine supplier, recommended the District immediately reduce the rod inspection frequency from every 1000 hours of engine runtime to 500 hours and for the long term either recondition or replace the fifty-eight engine rods. District staff is confident that the delay has not put the engines at risk of failure. In 1997 Cooper Energy Services sent the District a Warranty-Repair agreement recommending a rod-reconditioning program. The Agreement was based on a pro- rating of materials based on actual engine hours at time of repair. Staff negotiated a cost for Cooper to remove rods, ship to the factory, recondition, return and install, plus District labor oversight and a contingency to develop a budget cost of$114,000. El Nino and a delay in the supplier schedule kept the project from starting until now. Cooper proposed, and staff concurs, that the re-conditioning the engine rods is the satisfactory and cost-effective long-term solution District Maintenance staff recommend using either new or our own rods in the re- conditioning program. In order to reduce the down time of the engines, District staff recommends the purchase of the use of seven new rods and use of one District-owned rod to start the project. Staff negotiated a reduced cost for the use of the seven new rods based on the return of seven used rods at the end of the program. The total cost of the use of seven new rods is $34,265. The rod purchase will allow Cooper to install our own reconditioned rods or new rods back in all of the engines. Staff has negotiated Page 1 the Cooper recondition program at a cost of $101,164.36 plus the use of seven new ' rods at $34,265 for a total of $135,428,36. Staff recommends a contingency including District staff oversight of $14,570.64 for a total project cost not to exceed $150,000.00. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff recommends awarding a contract to Cooper Energy Services, for the warranty repair work on eight Central Power Generation engines for $135,429.36 and a contingency amount of$14,570.64 (District staff support and estimated engine hour increase) for a total amount not to exceed $150,000. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District operates and maintains central generation facilities at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. The primary role of the Central Generation plants is to satisfy the requirements in the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit requirement for the reliable supply of electricity for plant equipment. The Central Generation plants are the primary source of electricity and thermal energy for the treatment plants, while Southern California Edison provides the backup source of electricity. Certain mission- critical equipment also has standby emergency power generation. The reliable operation of the Central Generation plants is key to assuring smooth operation of the process plants and to the prevention of sewage spills. ALTERNATIVES Purchase 58 new rods at an approximate cost of$290,000 plus labor. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Master Connecting Rod Reconditioning Proposal Page 2 150 Lincoln Avenue Groh Cny.PA 161'7.1898 Mlt Tel ya 58 8000 fax 412:58 3574 • Co .e axO COOPER Cobe. m ope ENERGY SERVICES Enterpmeexemen9 ot En.Tronia Penn"" Sup 60i July 25, 1997 Orange County Sanitation District Power Plant Maintenance Supervisor P.O. Box 8127, Plant k2 Located at Huntington Beach, CA Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 USA Subject: Master Connecting Rod Reconditioning Proposal Gentlemen: The following information provides historical background and the reconditioning proposal terms and conditions for the LSV-4-6A master connecting rod. t• Background Since 1989, there have been sixteen (16) incidents of cracked or broken master connecting rods in Cooper-Bessemer® LSVB engines rated at 400 RPM. Five (5) of these failures resulted in significant engine damage. All failed rods were manufactured since 1984 and were characterized by a crack, originating in the main crank pin bore and propagating through the narrow section of the rod between the crank pin bore and the articulated rod pin bore. Since early last year, an ultrasonic inspection method has been used successfully to inspect connecting rods in-situ at 500-hour intervals. Since the first failures, Cooper Energy Services (CES) has conducted extensive investigations and analyses to identify the root cause of this problem and an appropriate corrective action strategy. The following paragraphs provide a brief overview of the analyses and outline CES' reconditioning offer to owners of LSVB engines shipped after January 1, 1985. Over the course of the investigation, CES has employed several respected consultants, including Battelle, Southwest Research Institute and Structural Reliability Technology. This group of experts assisted CES' in-house design engineering, quality assurance, metallurgical, solid mechanics and manufacturing engineering technical resources, along with the support of bearing manufacturers, connecting rod forgers, customers and others. Until early 1996, restricted access to failed connecting rods limited CES' ability to analyze the failures and determine root cause. Page One of Five Page 2 of 5 July 25, 1997 Extensive analysis and testing has determined that the and failures start from microcracks in the main pin bore, eventually propagating through the thinnest section of rod. Microcracks have typically developed after more than 7,500 hours of operation and propagate from an undetectable size to critical size in the range of 500 to 700 hours. Material tests have consistently showed that the rod material meets or exceeds design specifications. Finite element stress analyses of the rod design showed that the bulk safety factor was greater than 4.0 under even the worst conceivable operating environment, confirming that the basic design was sound. Logically then, the failures had to be caused by some other factor. A review of the operating conditions at the failure sites could not confirm any unacceptable operating conditions, even though nine (9) of the sixteen (16) failures occurred at one site. Some, but not all, of the rods showed evidence of fretting, or adhesive wear, between the rod bore and the bearing shell outer diameter. Attention then focused on the manufacturing process. Even though the LSVB connecting rods are manufactured according to detailed engineering specifications with processes that meet the most stringent quality standards, the investigations revealed subtle differences in some of the connecting rods manufactured since 1984. The manufacturing history of the LSVB rods was found to be an important factor in the failure tendency. Prior to 1985, rods were manufactured in-house using a process of turning with conventional tooling, followed by honing to establish accurate bore size and surface finish. In 1985, wear in the turning machines made it necessary to add a bore grinding operation before honing to adequately control the bore size. Eventually, the rod machining was subcontracted to an outside source. This source used newer CNC turning machines with high speed carbide tooling, which were able to meet bore size and surface finish specifications without grinding or honing operations. During the period that the rods were out-sourced, CES invested in similar CNC machinery that essentially replicated the process used by the subcontractor. This machinery continues in use at this time, although the finish honing process has been restored in the past year. Also, for a period of time, shot peening was added as a final finishing step to produce a residual compressive stress layer in the master rod bore. Essentially, it has been determined that the honing process provided some beneficial characteristics that were not well understood prior to completion of the recent investigations. The high-speed carbide turning machinery, although very precise and accurate, has a tendency to leave a very thin layer of residual tensile stress caused by local work hardening of the surface. Honing after turning both removes the thin tensile layer and creates a thin compressive residual stress layer. Of course, compressive stresses are beneficial to the prevention of crack Initiation and propagation. Further, the honing process creates a crosshatched surface pattern that aids in oil retention on the surface of the bore. It is believed that this oil retention helps reduce the risk of adhesive wear, often referred to as fretting, between the rod bore and the bearing shell outer diameter. In reviewing the surface finishes of the rod bore and the mating bearing shell, the smoother rod bore surface finish after honing appears to be more compatible with the shell surface, reducing the tendency for adhesive wear between the rod bore and the shell. The short-lived attempt to use final shot peening as a protective measure was unsuccessful because it created small Imperfections in the hardened as-tumed bore. Statistically, some of these imperfections were located in areas that may have led to crack Initiation in the critical area close to the thinnest section of the rod bore. Page 3 of 5 July 25. 1997 An extensive review, with the assistance of the bearing shell supplier, has concluded that an increase in bearing shell crush, or preload, would be beneficial. New bearing shells having 0.0055/0.0065" crush (current shells have 0.003/0.004") will provide increased contact pressure with the back of the bearing shell. This will have a beneficial effect on adhesive wear. :• Reconditioning Process Based on Its extensive analyses, CES has determined that existing connecting rods can be reworked to eliminate the risk of premature failure from the factors that are discussed above. The reconditioning process requires removal of the master connecting rods from the engine. Using special tooling, the rods can be removed from the engine without disturbing the top end of the engine. Once outside the engine, the rods will be shipped to CES' Grove City, Pennsylvania factory for a reconditioning procedure involving the following steps: • The rod will be carefully inspected using non-destructive methods to verity surface condition in the rod bore. • The faces of the joint between the rod and rap will be milled to reduce the bore diameter of the rod and cap assembly after it is bolted together again. • The bore will be turned to a size that is approximately 0.002" smaller than the final finished bore size. • After turning, the bore will be carefully honed to final size, removing at least 0.002" from the bore to remove any residual tensile stresses from the turning process. • After honing, the rods will be nitrocarburized to increase surface hardness, strength and adhesive wear resistance. • As a final quality measure, the rods will be inspected to assure conformance to design specifications. • The rods will then be reinstalled in another engine; downtime will be reduced by installing previously reconditioned rods that will be traded for the customer's original rods from the engine. :• Reconditioning Proposal Cooper Energy Services offers the following: • While the warranties on most of the connecting rods in service today have long since expired, we realize that our customers have been subjected to considerable inconvenience as a result of the rod inspection program. As an accommodation to our customers, and to induce them to take the important safety step of obtaining reconditioned rods, we are prepared to bear a significant portion of the cost of acquiring and installing reconditioned rods. We want to establish a program that will treat all customers equally and yet still take into account differences in their operating experiences. To accomplish this, we will provide parts and labor at a cost to the Page 4 of 5 July 25, 1997 customer that will be based on a calculated beneficial life of the engines. The customer will be offered a fixed price package that includes reconditioning the connecting rods, labor to remove/replace, plus all associated components, 1. e. new set of connecting rod bearing shells, articulated rod bushing, gaskets and necessary fasteners. • This offer is made contingent upon CES labor being performed utilizing proprietary tooling to remove/replace connecting rods which eliminates the need to remove power cylinder heads, pistons and top side fuel, water and Intake air headers. All customers have the option to perform the connecting rod removaltreplacement providing their own labor. Should any customer wish to perform additional engine maintenance, i.e. power cylinder liner, piston and rings, or power cylinder head reconditioning at this opportunity, CES will provide a competitive quote for such additional labor and/or parts. • However, for any connecting rod that is still covered under the original warranty of purchase, the reconditioning of the connecting rod will be performed in accordance with the applicable warranty. • The following constitutes the beneficial life formula to determine the cost to customers. No. of Encine Hours x Customer Cost = Net Customer Cost 200,000 (a) Beneficial life of connecting rod at 200,000 hours (b) Customer cost per each rod reconditioning includes a new set of Conn rod bearing shells, articulated rod bushing, side cover door gaskets and necessary fasteners at a price of$7,228.00 per Conn rod (c) CES labor to remove/replace conn rods per engine at the following: 12-cylinder engine at$12,341.00 16-cylinder engine at$15,197.00 20-cylinder engine at$18.073.00 Example The following example calculates a 12-cylinder engine (6 rods) having attained 20,000 hours of operation: Conn rod reconditioning per(b) above: 20,000 hrs x $7,228 =$722.80 each x 6 rods or$4,336.80 total 200,000 hrs. Labor. 12-cylinder engine from (c) above$12,341.00 Page 5 of 5 July 25. 1997 20,000 hrs. x $12,341.00 =$1,234.10 total 200,000 hrs. Thus the 12-cylinder engine customer cost at 20,000 operation hours would equal: Rod reconditioning (6 rods) $4,336.80 Labor to removetreplace 1,234.10 Total $5 570 CO • All work performed by Cooper Energy Services is per standard terns and conditions attached. • Until the connecting rods are replaced or reconditioned, CES strongly recommends that the ultrasonic inspection be continued at 500-hour intervals. CES is confident of its reconditioning program, but does recommend an ongoing ultrasonic inspection program at 1000-hour intervals following the reconditioning or replacement of the connecting rods. • We realize that this formula will not precisely measure the operational life of each rod in service. However, it is based on numbers that are readily available to us for all customers. This offers ease of administration that will be critical if we are to schedule and implement this program as quickly and effectively as possible for all customers. We promise you an all out effort on our part, but will need a large degree of cooperation and understanding from our customers if we are to get this problem fixed in a way that is fair to everyone. We will attempt to accommodate each customer's needs when it comes to scheduling service and delivery, but obviously we will be limited in the number of customers we can serve at any one time. Please contact Mike Marks as follows to discuss scheduling or any other questions you may have: Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating Products Division 150 Lincoln Avenue Grove City, PA 16127 Telephone: 412.458-3537 FAX:412-458-3525 E-mail: memarks®cooper-energy-services.com Sincerely, �v Mi6hae &44 Senior Field Engineer MEM:mis Copy: R. M. Cote K. M. Rapp S x DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT[MN COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, May 4, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 4, 1999, at 6 p.m., in the District's Operations Center at Plant 2. After a tour of several projects at Plant 2, Chair Eckenrode called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norm Eckenrode, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Steve Anderson Maintenance Guy Carrozzo Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Gerald Sigler Jon Thomsic, Project Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Mike White, Controller Terri Josway, Safety Manager Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Jan Debay, Board Chair Russell Patterson OTHERS PRESENT: Christina Shea Bill Knopf, Carollo Engineers Lee Badertscher, Lee and Ro Dennis Kasper, Parsons Phil Peterson, Spec Services (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 7 PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 July 1, 1999 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the April 6, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin indicated that an agenda Hem was being presented to the FAHR Committee regarding a$200,000 increase in temporary contract employee services budget for the remainder of FY 1999-00, and an increase in the budget for FY 2000-01 to$2.4 million. It is anticipated that an additional engineer and several construction managers and inspectors will be required for the increase in the capital improvement program. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Mr. Ludwin reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and Construction Manager John Linder reviewed the report on Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). There were two change orders that required PDC Committee approval. (10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Mr. Ludwin reported that there was one Professional Services Agreement (PSA)approved by the General Manager during the past month. (11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Mr. Ludwin reported that one task contract was awarded. a PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 July 1, 1999 (12) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM(GWRS)STATUS REPORT Jim Herberg updated the members on the GW RS activities. The federal EIS record of determination is expected in mid-May. This approval is necessary if federal funds are requested. Of the 32 Design Memoranda, 22 should be finalized by August. A Board Workshop is scheduled for July 15 to review the project and to discuss the framework for the governance of the project. The Organization Implementation Plan will be presented to the Joint Coordinating Committee in August or September. (13) ACTION ITEMS(Items a-d) a. POCOO-35 (1)Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1,for a total revised project budget of$3,475,762; (2) Ratify Change Order No.5 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No.5.41-1,with Advanco Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$92,891 and 85 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,390,547; and (3)Accept Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41,1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Complefion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanoo Constructors, Inc. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. b. PDCOO.36 (1)Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-40-1,to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid),for a total revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid); (2) Ratify Change Order No.4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4(Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of $47,289, and a time extension of 40 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$954,229;and (3) Accept Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1,Job No. Pt-44-4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. C. PDCOO-37 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No. J-35-2,for an amount not to exceed$2,255,680. PDC Committee Minutes d Page 4 July 1, 1999 Jon Thomsic reviewed the process leading to the recommendation under consideration and explained the reasons for the recommendation of other than the low bidder. He indicated that consultant recommended variances from the standards of NFPA820 will be submitted to OSHA for review before any changes are made. It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. d. PDC00-38 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for design of Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No.J-77,for a total amount not to exceed$2,208,810. Matt Smith explained the reasons for the staff recommendation. After the initial proposal evaluations, and Black&Veatch was chosen based on the strengths exhibited during interviews with the two top proposers. It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. (14) INFORMATIONAL ITEM a. PDC00-39 Proposed FY 2000-01 Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. Information only item. Mike White presented the draft FY 2000.01 Joint Works Operating and Capital budgets for comment and discussed the changes from the FY 1999-00 budget. Staff will address the reserves in light of the Little Hoover Commission report that was just released. David Ludwin discussed the Capital Improvement Budget and the types of projects that are Included. Each project will be detailed in the final budget. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. y PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 July 1, 1999 (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 1, 2000 at 5 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: J a Tappan Committee Secretary N:Nq.Me�aMeNMt. W]JAlnule5N504CO POC MInutm.Ea PDCCOMMITTEE Meesioanngr000ett r s Ra xea6 AGENDA REPORT 1a Number Item Numiw POCo 35 15(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, for a total revised project budget of$3,475,762; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, with Advanco Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$92,891 and 85 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,390,547. and (3) Accept Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. SUMMARY Change Order No. 5 includes 12 items of added work and 6 credit items including an item for liquidated damages in the amount of$22,000 to Contract No. 5-41-1. There is a 85 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages are $1000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The budget for this project is increased from $3,395,200 to $3,475,762 to provide additional funds for the change order and construction staff costs. Contract Start Date April 13, 1998 Original Contract Completion Date June 6, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 5 Current Contract Completion Date August 30, 1999 Actual Completion Date September 21, 1999 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 22 Liquidated Damages Assessment $22,000 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $2,196,376.00 Previous Authorized Change $ 101,280.00 This Change Order (add) $ 92,891.00 Change Orders to Date $ 194,171.00 Percentage Increase 8.84% Amended Contract Price $2,390,547.00 These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. The City of Newport Beach will reimburse the District for Items 11 and 16. r ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Negative Declaration No. 97111079 approved on 1-26-98 by City of Newport Beach ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Table 3. Change Order History 4. Change Order TH:MB:Ic BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 56,000 $ 134,600 $ 134.600 $ 134.600 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 100% Consultant PSA $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25.000 $ 24,608 98% Construction Contract 5 699.600 $ 2.297.656 $ 92,891 $ 2.390.547 $ 2.297,656 $ 92,891 $ 2.390.547 $ 2,338,876 98% Construction(Other)** $ 49,400 $ 66,086 $ 66,086 $ 66,086 $ 66,086 Construction Staff $ 90,000 $ 807.855 $ 26,674 $ 834,529 $ 807,855 $ 26,674 $ 834.529 $ 812,807 97% Contingency $ 39,003 $ (39,003) $ - $ TOTAL $ 895.000 $ 3.395.200 $ 80.562 $ 3,475,762 $ 3,331,197 $ 119.565 $ 3,450,762 $ 3,310.891 96% Includes Reimbursement to City of Newport Beach for Design.Purchase of Easement.Contribution from City of Newport Beach,and Reimbursement to CSDS for City Sewers &41-1 outlyetoLrad Revisetl OWWOo0 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1 ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 04/13/98 $ 2,196,376.00 $ 2,196,376.00 420 420 CO NO, 1' 03/04/99 $ 15,496.00 $ 2,211,872.00 0.71% 0 420 CO NO. 2' 08/02/99 $ 15,918.00 $ 2,227,790.00 1.48% 0 420 CO NO. 3' 12/22/99 $ 31,490.00 $ 2,259,280.00 2.86% 0 420 CO NO. 4" 02/03/00 $ 38,376.00 $ 2,297,656.00 4.61% 0 420 CO NO. 5 Pending $ 92,891.00 $ 2,390,547.00 8.84% 85 505 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 Approved by the PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 541-1 COSTATc.S O ' 0 CHANGE ORDER HISTORY Relocation of Lido Pump Station Contract No. 5-41-1 Change Order No. 1 —GM Approval 03/04/99 Item No. Description Amount Da s Type 1 Conduit Schedule Revisions $ 9,233.00 0 Omission 2 PLC Revisions 8,088.00 0 Omission 3 Miscellaneous Control Revs 3,810.00 0 Omission 4 Revise Central Processors (2,216.00) 0 Design Change 5 Delete Computer 7 853.00 0 Design Change 6 Revise Waterproofing 3,546.00 0 Omission 7 HVAC Coil Coaling 889.00 0 Design Change Total Change Order No. 1 $ 15 496.00 0 Change Order No. 2—GM Approval 08/02/99 Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Remove Undisclosed Asphalt $ 1,781.00 0 Changed Condition 2 Conduit Penetrations 883.00 0 Design Change 3 Control Building Stucco 2388.00 0 Design Change 4 Driveway Reinforcing Steel 891.00 0 Design Change 5 Relocate Power Feed 1,847.00 0 Changed Condition 6 Rotate Manhole 828.00 0 Design Change 7 Relocate Panel 778.00 0 Design Change 8 Piping Modifications 810.00 0 Design Change 9 Revise Bleeder Line 2,253.00 0 1 Design Change 10 Revise Force Main B Drain 2,039.00 0 Desi n Change 11 Delete Wetwell Liner (1,700.00) 0 Desi n Change 12 Reroute Air Duct 3120.00 0 Desi n Change Total Change Order No. 2 $ 15 918.00 0 Change Order No. 3—GM Approval 12/22/99 Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Revised Traffic Control $ 15 418.00 0 Design Change 2 Warning Signs $230.00 0 Design Change 3 Repair Existing Force Main $8 031.00 0 Changed Condition 4 Pump Bleeder Lines $ 1 731.00 0 Design Change 5 MCC Revisions $ 8 080.00 0 Omission 8 Reduce Retention 0.00 0 Other Total Change Order No. 3 $ 31 400.00 0 v Change Order History Contract No. 5-41-4 Change Order No. 4—PDC Approval 02/03100 item No. I Description Amount Days Type 1 Adjustment of Engineers $38,376.00 0 Other Quantifies Total Change Order No.4 1 $38 376.00 1 0 Change Order No. 5—Board Approval 04/24/00 Item No. Description Amount No's Type 1 Temporary SCE Conduit $26 023.00 Changed Condition 2 Revise Manhole No. 23 780.00Design Change 3 Undisclosed Utilities 30,897.00Changed Condition 4 Post Installation Videos 1,986.00Design Change 5 Misc. Control Upgrades 13 876 .00 Desi n Chan e 6 Relocate Jobsile Materials 5,765.00Other 7 Outside Lights 1 145.0DDesign Change 8 Delete Deck Coating3,604.00Design Change 9 Revised Demolition 4 000.00 0 Design Change 10 Factory Test Reimbursement (1,690.00) 0 Other 11 Additional Traffic Striping 8,174.00 0 Work Not Related 12 Security Cage 180400 0 Desl n Change 13 Revised Mix Desi n (6,482.00) 0 Design Change 14 Revised Equipment Tags 16 607.00 21 Design Change 'IS Revised Shorina 2,854.00 0 Changed Condition 16 Paving Coordination 9 872.00 0 Work Not Related 17 Resolution of Dis ute 12 444.00 0 Design Change 18 Liquidated Dama es 22 000.00 0 Other TOTAL $ 92 891.00 85 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 1 —5 $194,171.00 85 DAYS Page 1 of 10 Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Dale: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (9eduet) $ 92,891.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONDUIT FOR OVERHEAD POWER LINES This item is for labor, materials, and equipment to install a temporary conduit for Southern California Edison high voltage power lines serving the area around the jobsite. These power lines were originally routed overhead on poles and were scheduled to be relocated by Southern California Edison prior to the Notice to Proceed for this project. The Edison project did not complete the work on schedule, preventing the start of shoring operations for the pump station. The power lines had to be temporarily rerouted below grade in conduits to allow construction to proceed. This item provided the conduit. Southern California Edison rerouted the power lines. This item includes $ 18,798 for Contractor extended overhead associated with the time extension. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(6)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $26,023.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 39 Calendar Days ITEM 2 —REDUCE DIAMETER OF MANHOLE 23 This item is to reduce the diameter of Manhole No. 23 to the City of Newport Beach standard diameter of 60 inches. The City owns this manhole. The contract drawings required 72" diameter manholes. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-3) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (780.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days _ Page 2 of 10 y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Dale: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 3— UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES This item is for removing undisclosed utilities and structures interfering with the installation of Sewer Lines B, C and D. The undisclosed utilities included an abandoned storm sewer, abandoned timbers, steel pipe, clay pipe, and manhole structures. This item also includes rerouting service laterals serving adjacent homes on Line C. None of the utilities were shown on the contract documents. This item includes $2.892 for Contractor extended overhead associated with the time extension. This Rem was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 30,897.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days ITEM 4—POST INSTALLATION 'VIDEOS This item is for providing videotapes of the interior of the completed Sewer Lines C and D as requested by the City of Newport Beach. The contract documents reference a City of Newport Beach standard specification specifying that the City is responsible for providing the videos. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411.11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1.986.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 10 e ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24. 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 5—MISCELLANEOUS CONTROL UPGRADES This item is for providing labor, materials, and equipment to install control features required for the station. The features include: a) Wiring for control relays R6 and R7 to provide a jog switch function for pumps b) Replacement of generator receptacle compatible with District Generator c) Thermostat switch for Control Room Temperature Alarm d) Current switches for air conditioner fail signal e) Current switch for Exhaust Fan No. 3 f) Revisions in programmable logic controller program g) Control logic revisions h) Installation of feeder cables for MCC A i) Hinges for explosion proof panel j) Applicable record drawing revisions These features upgraded the controls to District control standards and were not required by the contract documents. There is no Contractor extended overhead associated with this item. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-17) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 13,876.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 19 Calendar Days ITEM 6— RELOCATE JOBSITE MATERIALS This item is for additional cost to move pipe, backfill, and equipment stored onsite to Plant No. 2. The City of Newport Beach requested the pump station yard be vacated to allow a landscaping contractor to begin landscaping the area for a City project. The materials were brought back to the site when needed for installation. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 1 D-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $5.765.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 10 a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 7—OUTSIDE LIGHTS This item is for additional labor and materials to revise one exterior light to an architectural downlight and to provide a switch for other exterior lights. The downlight, which minimizes glare to the neighborhood, is located at the front door and is always on to provide access lighting for crews called out at night. The other exterior lights can be switched on as needed for emergency work. The contract documents called for exterior lights that come on automatically at night. However, the lights are bright and could be a nuisance to adjacent residents. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,145.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—DELETE ELASOTMERIC DECK COATING This item is a credit to eliminate an elastomeric coating of the concrete top of the pump station. The coating is not necessary and would require periodic maintenance. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-22) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (3,604.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9—REVISED DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PUMP STATION The item is a credit to reduce the depth of demolition of the existing pump station concrete structure. The existing station is adjacent to several homes. The reduced depth allowed for a smaller and shallower excavation to minimize impact on homeowners during demolition. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-23) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $(4,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 10 d ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5.41-1 ITEM 10— FACTORY TEST REIMBURSEMENT This item provides reimbursement for travel cost for District personnel to attend factory testing of the sewage pumps. The contract specifies that the Contractor shall reimburse the District for the cost to attend factory tests. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-26) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (1,690.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 —ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC STRIPING This item is for additional traffic striping at the intersection of Newport Boulevard and Via Lido. The majority of this additional striping is to finish striping scheduled to be completed as part of an adjacent Caltrans project at the intersection of the Pacific Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard. The striping scheduled to be completed as part of the Caltrans project could not be accomplished until street work on this project was finished. The City of Newport Beach requested that work be completed at the same time as final traffic striping for this project to minimize traffic disruption. This item also includes the replacement of wom out striping and crosswalks at the intersection that were not included in the scope of this contract, but requested by the City to provide all new striping at the intersection. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-27) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 8,174.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12 —SECURITY CAGE This item is to install a security cage around the back0ow preventor on the potable water supply and the receptacle for standby generators. This equipment is located outside in a public area. The cage protects the equipment from vandalism and was not required by the contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-28) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,804.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 10 ° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Dale: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 13—REVISED CONCRETE MIX DESIGN FOR CLASS A CONCRETE This item is a credit item to revise the concrete mix design for 246 cubic yards of Class A concrete. The concrete for the pump station walls, deck, and control building was affected by this change. These revisions provide a mix design similar to the District standard mix design providing more workable concrete. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 5411-9) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (6,482.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14—REVISED EQUIPMENT TAGS AND WIRE NUMBERS This item is to revise loop tag numbers to comply with latest District standards for equipment and wire identification. The additional costs include revisions to equipment tags, wire tags, loop drawings, panel drawings, and record drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 5411-18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 16,607.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 21 Calendar Days ITEM 15— REVISED TRENCH SHORING This item is for additional labor and materials to revise the shoring for the excavation of Sewer Line A. The existing sewer that Manhole No. 15 was to be constructed on was found to be two feet west of the location shown on the drawings. This shortened the length of Sewer Line A that routed to the new pump station wet well. The Contractor was unable to utilize the trench shield designed for the sewer as it did not fit between the wet well and the manhole. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $2,854.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 7 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ° 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 16—PAVING COORDINATION WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH This item is for additional base paving, paving overlays, paving subcontractor move-ins, and curb subcontractor move-ins requested by the City of Newport Beach as described below: a) Additional paving move-in and overlay on Newport Boulevard, south of Short Street, to provide finish paving prior to the summer tourist season. b) Additional base paving, paving overlay, paving move-in, and curb and gutter move-in to coordinate the completion of the work with another contract associated with the City of Newport Beach, which was also scheduled to pave on Newport Boulevard. The paving was completed on this project to minimize impact to the public traveling on Newport Boulevard. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 9,872.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 17— RESOLUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DISPUTE This item is a settlement of a request for equitable adjustment for electrical engineering services performed by the electrical subcontractor during the construction of the work as detailed below: a) Design of the motor control center. This item is no additional cost to the District. b) Cost for miscellaneous control revisions not included in previous changes. c) Cost to complete record drawings to reflect District plan changes and field change orders where reimbursement was not previously requested. d) Cost to assist in defining the scope of Plan Change 13, revising conduit layout and routing. e) Cost to design the final layout of electrical equipment in the Pump Station Control Room. The size of the room was limited. f) Additional start up cost for troubleshooting of modem communication between the Pump Station Control Room and Plant No. 1 Control Room and troubleshooting of the reactive air level monitor. Other troubleshooting is at no additional cost to the District. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions, ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 12.444.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 8 of 10 ' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24. 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 ITEM 18—LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The Revised Final Completion Du--a Date is August 30, 1999, including all time extensions to date. The Actual Contract Completion Date is September 21, 1999. This item is to withhold Liquidated Damages or$ 1000Iday for a total of 22 calendar days in accordance with the Contract Special Provision 50-8. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions, CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (22,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $92,891.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 85 Calendar Days Page 9 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: May 24, 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 85- day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 13, 1998 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 6, 1999 Time Extension this C.O. 85 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 85 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 505 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 30, 1999 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 22 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: September 21, 1999 Original Contract Price $ 2,196,376.00 Prey. Authorized Changes $ 101,280.00 This Change (Add) $ 92,891.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,390,547.00 Page 10 of 10 w ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5) Dale: Mav 24. 2000 Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1 Board Authorization Date: May 24, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS Contractor Date ,I PDC COMMITTEE Weing ! TO -24-W . s-aoo szam AGENDA REPORT '10 36 "�14(d)� Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. 131 44 4 (REBID) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid), for a total revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid); (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-44-4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of $47,289, and a time extension of 40 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $954,229; and (3) Accept Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1 44 4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Change Order No. 4 includes two items of added work and a time extension to Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). There is a 40 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. A portion of the work performed under Job No. P1-34-4 (Rebid) was budgeted under Job No. P1-40-1. A transfer of$200,000 from Job No. P1-40-1 is required to pay for additional work performed under Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). Contract Start Date April 14, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 10, 1999 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date April 1, 2000 Actual Completion Date April 1, 2000 Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 618,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 288,940.00 This Change (CO No. 4, Add) $ 47,289.00 Change Orders To Date $ 336,229.00 Percentage Increase To Date 54.41 % Final Contract Price $ 954,229.00 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (CIP: Section 8—Page 77) , ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A transfer$200,000 is requested to be made to Job No. P1-444 (Rebid) budget from Job No. P1-40-1 budget. A portion of the scope of work, Waterproofing and Sealing of the Administration Building, originally planned under Job No. P140-1 was accomplished under Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). This budget transfer will provide funding for this work. Budget tables for both jobs are attached. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P1 A4-4 (Rebid), Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, provides for additional structural supports for the Blower Building, Dewatering Building "C", Belt Press Building "M", and the Administration Building to bring these structures up to current seismic code requirements. The work also includes sealing and waterproofing the exterior of the Administration Building. Holmes and Narver prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Ark Construction Company on January 27, 1999. The contract is 100% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 4: Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Shear Wall Additions to the $33,480 40 Design Change Administration Building 2 Construct New Perimeter Foundation and $13,809 0 Design Change Reseal Bottom of Storefront Window System on the Administration Building Total —Change Order No. 4 $47,289 40 ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project is included in a previously approved master Plan/EIR. The Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. Page 2 ATTACHMENTS p r 1. Budget Information Table— Job No. Pt-44-7(Rebid) 2. Budget Information Table — Job No. P1-40-1 3. Change Order Status Report 4. Change Order History 5. Change Order H1wp.dla%agendWBoard Agenda Reports12000 Board Agenda ReporlsV) Vtera 14(d).doc JF:lc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 JOB NO. P1-44-4 (Rebid) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETETO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Project Development Design Staff $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 180.000 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,OD0 1 $ 180.000 100% Construction Contract $ 900,000 $ 906,940 47,289 $ 954.229 S 906,940 $ 47,289 $ 954,229 $ 906.940 95% Construction(Other) Construction Staff $ 129,000 $ 129,000 245.771 $ 374,771 $ 129,000 245771 $ 374.771 $ 348,839 93% Contingency $ 93,060 (93,060) TOTAL $ 1,229,000 $ 1,329,000 200,000 1 $ 1.529.000 $ 1,235.940 $ 293,060 $ 1.529,000 $ 7455,779 118% NOTE: A transfer of$200.000 is requested to be made from Job No. P1-40-1 budget to Job No. P7-44-4(rebid)budget. H:1wp.dt.Wr,g obsmnt,MsW1J4iReb418ud9e1.InI.M.on.Table Remsed 4/1312000 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-40-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Consultant PSA $ 300.000 $ 163,500 $ (19.200) $ 144,300 5 152.050 $ - $ 152,050 $ 142.928 94% District-Design Phase $ 200.000 $ 103.600 $ (5,000) $ 98,600 v' $ 82.000 $ - $ 82.000 $ 72.000 88% Construction Contract $ 2,298,000 1 $ 25.800 $ (25,800) $ - ,*�.', $ - 0% District-Construction Phase $ 250.000 $ - $ - $ - r $ 161,000 $ 161,000 $ 29,224 18% _Contingency $ $ - $ - $ 0% Other $ 12.000 $ 150.000 $ (150.000) $ - ;.j $ 11,000 $ 11.000 $ 0% TOTAL $ 3.060.000 $ 442.900 $ (200,000) $ 242,900 $ 406,050 $ - $ 406,050 $ 244,152 29% NOTE: A transfer of$200,000 is requested to be made from Job No. Pt-40.1 budget to Job No. P7-44-4(rebid)budget. H%"dlaWW%budge0eudaeroLrevis 000413 Revised 411W200o CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-44-4 (REBID) APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 04/14/1999 $ 618,000.00 $ 618,000.00 0.00% 180 180 CO NO. 1' 11/08/1999 $ 14,032.00 $ 632,032.00 2.27% 0 180 CO NO. 2 12/02/1999 $ 56,368.00 $ 688,400,00 1 11.39% 1 14 194 CO NO, 3 02/23/2000 $ 218,540.00 $ 906,940.00 46.75% 120 314 CO NO. 4 Pending $ 47,289.00 $ 954,229.00 54.41% 40 354 *Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 H.WactatengYoba and wnlractaWl 44-4 REBID\Change Otdete=Aatatus nls CHANGE ORDER HISTORY Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job No. Pt-444 (Rebid) Change Order No. 1 —GM Approval 11/08/99 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Repair Existing Wood Window $ 1,080.00 0 Design Change Frames 2 Seal Vertical Expansion Joint in 4,680.00 0 Design Change Aluminum Plaster Screed 3 Rout and Seal Edges of Aluminum 8,272.00 0 Omission Plaster Screed Total Change Order No. 1 $14,032.00 0 Change Order No. 2—PDC Approval 12/02/99 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Removal and Disposal of Asbestos $56,368.00 0 Changed Condition Contaminated Ceiling in the Administration Building Engineering De artment Total—Change Order No. 2 $56 368.00 0 Change Order No. 3 —BD Approval 02/23/00 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade $ 5796.00 0 Omission of the Blower Buildin 2 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade 39,780.00 0 Omission of Belt Press Buildin M 3 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade 23,012.00 60 Changed Condition of the Administration Buildin 4 Repainting Existing Wood Windows 20,152.00 0 Design Change on the Administration Building I 5 Recaulking Storefront Window 51,284.00 0 Design Change System on the Administration Buildin 6 Reseal Parapet Cap on the 30,516.00 0 Design Change Administration Buildin 7 Seismic Investigation and Repair of 48,000.00 60 Changed Condition the Administration Buildin Total—Change Order No. 3 $218 540.00 120 Change Order History Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid) Change Order No. 4—Board Approval 05124M KIM Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Shear Wall Additions to the $33,480.00 40 Design Change Administration Building 2 Constrict New Perimeter Foundation 13,809.00 0 Design Change and Reseal Bottom of Storefront Window System on the Adminstration Building Total—Change Order No. 4 $47,289.00 40 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 1 —4 $336,229.00 160 DAYS Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-9127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: May 4. 2000 Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid) Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduet) $47,289.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —SHEAR WALL ADDITIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING The Contractor was directed to construct or modify the fallowing shear walls in the Administration Building as required by the Design Engineer. A. Add new shear wall along gridline 2.2 between gridlines D and E. B. Reconstruct existing shear wall along gridline 6 between gridlines C and D. C. Reconstruct existing shear wall along gridline E between gridlines 1.2 and 2. D. Add new shear wall along gridline J between gridlines 9 and 10. This additional work on the above shear walls was added during the opening up and checking of existing walls in the Administration Building under Change Order No. 3, item 7. It was discovered that two shear walls required upgrading to current seismic standards and two shear walls were not installed per plan during construction of the original building. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Ref. Plan Change No. 10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $33,480.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 40 Calendar Days ITEM 2—CONSTRUCT NEW PERIMETER FOUNDATION AND RESEAL BOTTOM OF STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM ON THE ADMINSTRATION BUILDING The Contractor was directed to construct a new foundation at the base of the existing aluminum storefront window system on the Administration Building in the landscaped areas near the front entrance and interior courtyard. The work included excavation, formwork, installation of reinforcing steel, placement of concrete and removal and replacement of the existing irrigation system where it interfered with the new foundation. The existing aluminum storefront window system was then resealed to the new perimeter foundation. During resealing of the existing storefront window system, it was found that water had been leaking into the building under the bottom window mullions. This was due to an inadequate extension of the existing foundation past the storefront window system on the original building. This work was not included in the original contract and was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) of the General Provisions. (Ref. FCO No. 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,809.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $47,289.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 40 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: Mav 4. 2000 Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job No. P7-44-4 (Ret id The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 40-calendar day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: April 14, 1999 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 10, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 40 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 174 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 354 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 1, 2000 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: April 1, 2000 Original Contract Price $ 618,000.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 288,940.00 This Change (Add) (Bedeel) $ 47,289.00 Amended Contract Price $ 954,229.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1011" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: May 4, 2000 Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job No. Pt-44-4 (Rabid Board Authorization Date: May 24. 2000 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Dale Accepted by: ARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dx To Ba• 5/4/00 5/24/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PD000-37 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION' Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and No. 2, Job No. J-35-2, for an amount not to exceed $2,255,680. SUMMARY The recently completed Area Classification Study of both plants has provided the District with a uniform documentation system showing potential fire and explosion hazard locations throughout the plants. The study identified many conditions that met code requirements at the time of construction, but are in violation of current code requirements. The study evaluated various options to bring all facilities into compliance with the latest OSHA/code standards. Compliance with hazardous location installation requirements is mandated for all facilities by the National Electric Code (NEC). Electrical hazardous area requirements under the NEC are retroactive and therefore must be applied to existing facilities. Potentially hazardous areas must be built using special methods and materials. Implementation of these projects will provide the District with full National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) compliance identified in the Area Classification Study. The next step is to generate detailed construction documents based on the study recommendations. Staff has solicited proposals from four firms. Based on the proposal evaluation and interviews, Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for both Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, to Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total amount of the agreement will not exceed $2,255,680. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The Board approved an initial budget amendment of$6,069.664 for two projects: J-35-2 r and J-35-3 on October 27, 1999. The Board approved an additional budget amendment of$22,405,756 for three projects: J-35-4; J-35-5; and J-35-6 on December 15, 1999, Funds for these projects are to be consolidated in project J-35-2 for a total of $28,475,420. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Area classification is defined as establishing boundaries between areas with varying risk for potential explosion. A hazardous location is normally defined as a location where fire or explosion hazards exist due to the potential presence of flammable gases or vapors, flammable liquids, etc. Class 1, Division 1 is a location where an explosive mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist under normal operating conditions. Class 1, Division 2 is a location in which an explosive mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist under abnormal conditions such as accidental rupture of a vessel or container, or failure of a ventilating system. Documentation of area classification for hazardous locations is required for all existing facilities by the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70), 1999 Edition. The National Electric Code requires that the District follow standards for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities (NFPA 820), 1995 Edition. The National Electric Code also requires all hazardous areas be upgraded to current standards. The purpose for this project, J-35-3, is to comply with NFPA 820 and reduce the potential for explosion by reducing the area classification from Class 1, Division 1, to Class 1, Division 2; or Class 1, Division 2 to non-hazardous area. The Area Classification Study, Job No. J-35-1, was initiated and approved by the Board on September 23, 1998. The study identified and documented the hazardous locations by creating area classification drawings. Code deficiencies in the plants were noted. Alternative solutions to code violations were examined and the most cost-effective designs were selected for implementation. The recommended course of action for the full compliance with NFPA 820 is tabulated in the Final Report of the Area Classification Study. Purpose The purpose of this PSA is to take the study recommendations through the design process and produce construction documents. Implementation of the design will bring the District into full compliance with NFPA 820. Budget History The Board approved budgets for Job No. J-35-2, Gas Piping Relocation/Physical Separation, and Job No. J-35-3, Administrative Control Program on October 27, 1999. As directed by the Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee, Staff is accelerating the remaining projects. Consequently, five projects are recommended for implementation. BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan JOB NO.J-35 Summary 'ORIGINAL 'CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED 'PROJECT BUDGET REVISED' ' AUTHORZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEI%1 J46.1 Pm'ect Devel ment $ 1.000.000 $ 1145000 $ 1145000 $ 1145000 $ 1,145000 S 706,000 62% J-35-2 Dssl nSUIT $ $78440 876,140 6 876440 $ 878440 1362 ConsulMnt PSA S 3353599 It 3.387599 $ 2265.680 S 2.255680 l35.2 Construction Concoct S 17 241892 1 11117.241.992 S J-35.2 construction(Other) $ 47441 $ 43"1 $ J-35.2 Construction Stan It 2226463 $ 2225463 $ J-35-2 contingency $ 4.704.486 It 4.704 486 $ TOTAL $ 1,000.000 S 29,620,420 $29,620.420 $ 1,145,000 $ 3,132.12D $ 4,277,120 $ 706A00 17% Notes:J-35-1 is the Area Classification Study and J-35-2 is the Implementatlon Plan. The current project budget for J-35-1 is$ 1,145,000. The current project budget for J-35-2 is$28,475,420. The project budget total is$29,620,420. N:",ft BS a CONTMCMU Zu 3s2&AWWd =Tewe.Wsp'35 Cm e Professional Services Agreement Status Report Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan Job No. J-35-2 Total Project Budget: $28,475,420 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 24. 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Proposed Original Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for $2,255,680 $0 PSA Plant Nos. 1 and 2 H:1wp.dtaten9UOBS 8 CONTRACTSU-35-2U-35-2 PSA Status Report doc 03I2WO ReWsed O5/14/98 1 AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT PLANT NOS. 1 &2 JOB NO. J-35-2 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting fines received Requests for Proposals: • Brown and Caldwell • Lee & Ro, Inc. • Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. • Spec Services Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. partnered with Lee& Ro, Inc. for this project. As a result, three responsive proposals were received on February 8, 2000. Formal interviews were conducted on February 16, 2000. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in the six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule —Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the three ' consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results for the three fines: 1. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 1349 Points 2. Brown and Caldwell 1196 Points 3. Spec Services 1180 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Parsons Engineerina Science. Inc. (Parsons) 1. Parsons has proposed an "integrated approach"which allows for optimization of the design between the project elements to reduce the construction costs to the District. All four project elements will be addressed simultaneously which allows for identification of the most cost effective solution. The approach will closely coordinate with Operations to minimize operational disruptions to the facilities during the construction. 2. Parsons' Integrated approach will identify the complete solution for a given area. This will facilitate and reduce the costs of review by the District. In addition, the potential for change orders will be significantly reduced when field conditions have changed or are otherwise not as presented in the Study Report. 3. The Parsons approach incorporates several Improvements identified in the J- 42 Plant Reinvention Project. These improvements can be incorporated into J-35-2 with little or no increased construction cost. A good example of this is the use of pipe bridges between digesters, which allow for pedestrian traffic. This improves access to the digester domes and eliminates loss of ground access associated with pipe racks. 4. In accordance with the District's as-built document requirements, Parsons will prepare the design documents to allow cost effective updating to reflect the constructed as-built conditions. 5. Design details, guidelines and specifications prepared for J-35-2 will be generalized and formatted for their inclusion in the District's standards for design and construction. This provides consistency and uniformity throughout the Districts' numerous ongoing projects within 6 months after contract Initiation. 6. In existing facilities, NFPA recognizes that It is not always practical to strictly apply all provisions of their standards. Physical limitations can necessitate disproportionate effort and expense with little or no Increase in fire protection. Parsons has over forty years of experience in the application of NFPA codes " and OSHA Title 8 since its existence to provide cost effective compliance without Increased risk to their clients. 7. The Parsons approach provides a "fresh look", which results in cost savings to the District. For example, Parsons will re-evaluate and declassify the sludge drying beds at Plant No. 2. This will be accomplished by simple modification of our procedures to eliminate the addition of primary sludge to the beds which is not practice. Declassification will reduce the costs of removing dried sludge from the beds and will facilitate operation by having consistency between Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Brown and Caldwell Brown & Caldwell presented a good solid engineering approach to this project based on the previous Brown and Caldwell Area Classification Study. However, their approach was not innovative enough to seek alternative economical solutions. Spec Services Spec Services also has the comprehensive understanding of the requirements of this project. However, excessive man-hours are required to accomplish the Scope of Work project elements. Consequently, they proposed the highest fees for this project. Summary Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. team as their first choice of the three responsive consultants. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the three candidates. The top-ranked consultant team of Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. submitted the second lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Staff negotiated with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for a reduction in fee of$223,211 from the proposed amount of$2,478,891 to the negotiated amount of$2,255,580. Though their fees remained the second lowest of the three proposals, OCSD staff felt that their thoroughness of the Scope warranted the additional proposed expense. Staff recommends Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. be awarded the Professional Services Agreement for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan at Plant Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-35-2 for a total fee not to exceed $2,255,680. MY.,jak Hft p.dWengWBS&CONTRACTSU-35-2U-35-2 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALAM AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT PLANT NOS. 1 & 2 JOB NO. J-35-2 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Parsons Eng. Science Brown and Caldwell Spec Services Reviewer A 394 378 342 Reviewer B 304 238 278 Reviewer C 270 208 194 Reviewer D 381 372 366 Total Score 1349 1196 1180 1680 Points Maximum Average Score 337 299 295 420 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 20343 13247 35388 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 52 52 52 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee '$2,255,680 $1,599.483 $2,486,684 • The revised figures reflect negotiated revised amount. PDC COMMITTEE We gDa TOBO.of Dir. 0'1L 00 Os/29/00 AGENDA REPORT fl> Number Item MMW cocoo-3e 19rn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for design of the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for a total amount not to exceed $2,208,810. SUMMARY The objective of the Effluent Pump Station Annex Project, Job No. J-77, is to replace the existing Foster Pump Station with a new expandable facility that is capable of providing adequate backup for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS) during excess flow events and routine maintenance. Originally, Project No. J-59, was to rehabilitate the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS). Carollo Engineers performed a preliminary evaluation study to determine the feasibility of the renovation of the FPS. The study concluded that for comparable cost, the District could design and build a new structure (Effluent Pump Station Annex) which would far exceed the capabilities that a renovated Foster Pump Station facility could provide. In March, the Board approved a revision of the project from the renovation of the existing FPS to the construction of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77. The new project will use the funds originally slated for Job No. J-59. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued to seven firms for the design of this new Effluent Pump Station (EPS)Annex. Three consultants submitted proposals on April 10, 2000: Black&Veatch, Brown and Caldwell, and Carollo Engineers. Staff recommends the approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Black & Veatch for a total amount not to exceed $2,208,810. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested for the Consultant PSA and supporting OCSD design staff costs. See the attached Budget Information Table. R. c Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 1999/2000 Budget Section 8,Page 178 and Page 107, Contract No.J-59, $28.200,000) • ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A request is made to move $320,000 from "Project Development" to the "Contingency phase. These funds are not needed for the completion of the Project Development phase, as this phase is essentially complete. Also, unneeded funds in the amount of $2,433,210 are being moved from the"Consultant PSA" task to "Contingency". The funds for this project are from Treatment Plant No. 2 Capital Improvement Budget under Project Number J-59. The job name and number were changed under PDC item number PDC00-02, with final approval from the Board of Directors on March 22, 2000. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this contract. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The original Foster Pump Station (FPS) structure is over 40 years old. Several minor upgrades have been performed over the years. However, the age and overall condition of the structure warrant major renovations to include structural and seismic upgrade, electrical redesign, and mechanical replacements/repairs were the District to continue use of this facility. The magnitude of these renovations prompted the District to perform a preliminary study regarding the feasibility of upgrade versus replacement of the existing facility. The cost of upgrading the FPS is comparable to that of building a new annex facility. Therefore, it was decided to construct a new EPS Annex. Proposal Evaluation Seven engineering consulting firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required scope of services. Of these seven, three firms submitted proposals on April 10. 2000: Black & Veatch; Brown and Caldwell; and Carollo Engineers. Interviews for each of these firms were held on April 18, 2000. After the first round of interviews with the above firms, the review panel had additional questions for two of the three firms, Carollo Engineers and Black and Veatch. The members of the panel felt they needed additional information prior to the final rating of the firms for selection. A second round of interviews was held on April 19, 2000. After completion of these supplementary interviews, the proposals were evaluated and ranked by Staff in accordance with District policy. Black & Veatch had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach, thorough understanding of the Scope of Work, similar large pump station experience, innovative project management tools, and project team/subconsultant selection. See R. SOH° Page 2 the attached "Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services" for more information. +� ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS The rehabilitation of Foster Pump Station (FPS) is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. A supplemental EIR will be processed to update the Program EIR to reflect replacement of the FPS rather than the rehabilitation indicated in the Strategic Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report (Black & Veatch) 3. PSA Status Report (Carollo Engineers) 4. Summary of Staff Evaluation of Proposals & Staff Recommendation RW:jak:jo H:1wp.dla%agenda%Board Agenda RepodsQDOO Board Agenda RepoAMOMOUIem Nq.doe aee. Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX JOB NO. J-77 1�+ ''h +DRIbIDIAI` t OttRiiEN�ltt' PRbP08ED 'PROhOSED a 'FttNdB + PRbPO$)_D l$ . f(IA7ED t , P111 OTRR$Ife ?I1 O ISB �y PRO��IE 't1*t 6U0'bETidl @4"r it E gb� r� „'AUTHORI�'ED :AUfiNO ATIOI) ,Tfjl'AL a ,n: l of °. 1 Dbel' 41 M BUDd to kr ,tfniftEABE h'ed � ', +1 ^) 10 DATE" N AUTROItIZATM111 tA.!kt, Project Development $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ 320.000 $ 50.000 $ 370,000 $ 320.000 $ 50.000 $ 37,057 10% Design Staff $ 1,861,000 $ 1.851,000 $ 1,851.000 $ - $ 1,851,000 $ 1,851,000 Consultant PSA' $ 4,676.000 $ 4.676,000 $ 2,433,210 $ 2,242,790 $ 33,980 $ 2208.810 $ 2,242,790 $ 33,980 2% Construction Contract $ 19,077,000 $ 19,077,000 $ 19,077,000 $ $ Construction Other $ $ Construction Staff $ 2,170.000 $ 2,170,000 $ 2,170,000 $ $ Contin ency* I $ 56,000 1 $ 56,000 $ 2.753,210 $ 2.809,210 $ TOTAL 1 $ 28.200,000 1 $ 28,200,000 1 $ - $ 2B,200,000 1 $ 403,980 Is 3,739,810 $ 4,143,790 $ 71,037 2% $33,980 authorized for Carollo Engineers--Preliminary Design Study H: v, lalanBUOBS 4 CONTR CTSU.77 Effluent Pump Station AnnexlJ-77 Buget Table.xleiDisuicu, KN Pd meneVonnatbudmn table Fmm Wvteed MT96 a Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pump Station Annex Job No. J-77 Total Project Budget: $ 28,200,000 Consultant: Black & Veatch Start Date of Project: May 25, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending — Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 $2,208,810 $2,208,810 HAwp.otatengUOBS S CONTRACTSU-77 Effluent Pump Stal on AnnaxV 77-PSA Status Report doe 04/27/00 E - . Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pump Station Annex Job No. J-77 Total Project Budget: $ 33,980 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: August 16, 1999 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 8/16/99 — Effluent Pump Station, Job No. J-59 $24,980 $24,980 Preliminary Design Study/Report 11/22/99 Addendum Provide additional analysis and detailed cost $6,000 $33,980 #1 estimate to compare Foster Rehabilitation with new Effluent Pump Station. H:b p.dtabnpUOBS&CONTF ACTSU-77 Effluent Pump Station Annew-77-PSA 2-status Report.dw 04/27/00 ReVwd OVUM w EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX JOB NO. J-77 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Black & Veatch • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • Boyle Engineering • CH2M HILL • Malcolm Pirnie • Montgomery Watson Boyle, CH2M HILL, Malcolm Pimie, and Montgomery Watson opted to not submit a proposal. The remaining three firms; Black & Veatch, Brown and Caldwell, and Carollo submitted responsive proposals on April 10, 2000. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a selected panel. Formal interviews were held with all three responsive firms and the review panel on April 18, 2000. The review panel consisted of six members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 It being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work—Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants —Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. a V 8. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results for the three firms: Black & Veatch 2958 Points • Brown and Caldwell 2437 Points • Carollo Engineers 2806 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Black & Veatch Collective scores placed Black&Veatch (B&V) as the first choice in the overall rankings. Four of the six District panel members ranked B&V first in their rankings. Two placed them second in their rankings. District Staff were impressed with B&V's top in-house project management, hydraulic specialist, overall project team, use of SPEC Services as electrical/instrumentation subconsultant, document accessibility through Cybemet document management system for all project team members, relative large Pump Station experience, and excellently written and presented proposal. Minor concerns included B&V's limited experience with the District staff and policies. However, with the strengths listed above, the panel felt that their overall approach would facilitate the design and subsequent construction of the Effluent Pump Station Annex. Brown and Caldwell Overall panel ranking of Brown & Caldwell placed them third out of the three proposals received. This Consultant did not offer an alternative to their technical selection of a vertical can pumping system. The panel felt that by limiting their "solution"to this one technology, they did not show much initiative or creativity in providing the "best" solution to our specific project needs. Carollo Engineers Carollo placed second overall in the overall rankings by the District panel. Two of the four panel members placed them first in their individual rankings. However, the margin between Carollo and their second choice of B&V was minimal. 4 The project team had a tough time after the initial interviews choosing either Carollo or B&V as a dear frontrunner. Carollo's proposal and presentation were well written and presented. Their project team and overall approach appeared strong. However, questions were raised as to Carollo's perception of the limitations of the scope. It was not clear in the first interview whether or not operational "upgrades"to the existing COBS facility to provide seamless interaction between COBS and this proposed EPS Annex were part of this project. Upon further discussion, it was determined that their scope excluded interaction with the OOBS facility other than to make recommendation(s)for upgrades to be made under a subsequent project. Their level of effort proposed for the instrumentation and control work was underestimated. Summary After initial interviews were concluded with the Consultants, Staff had additional questions for both Black&Veatch and Carollo Engineers. The interview panel met with each ffrm's representatives a second time. After completion of these second round interviews, the panel collectively selected Black & Veatch team as their first choice of the three responsive consultants. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals as submitted by the three candidates. Carollo was the apparent low base fee proposal at $1,959,410. However, they had provided "optional" services fees of an additional $250,000 for a total fee proposal of$2,209,410. Black&Veatch provided an initial fee proposal of $2,246,533. Brown & Caldwell's fees were the highest proposed at$2,435,000. Both B&V and B&C proposals included the "optional"services that Carollo had proposed as part of their total fees. As Staff had selected Black&Veatch prior to opening of the fee proposals as their consultant of choice, the nominal difference in cost between B&V and Carollo (coupled with Carollo's scope limitation)was not great enough to warrant a change in the panel's choice of Consultant. Therefore, the panel chose to recommend award of the project to Black & Veatch at their original proposed fee. Concurrently, the District chose to award another somewhat related District project (J-71-1)to Black &Veatch. As Jim Clark is the Project Manager for both of these projects, B&V reduced their proposed fee by$37,723 for this project to account for any duplication in efforts between these two projects. The J-71-1 project fee was also reduced. Therefore, the selection panel recommends the award of this project to Black & Veatch for a total proposed fee of$2,208,810. RW.,jak:jo H-. vP.db%e VNJOBS&CONTRACTSV-A EfRuanl Pump Station AnnaxU-T7 Staff Ev Iuation.dw TABLE 1.0 Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Black & Veatch Brown and Caldwell Carollo Engineers Reviewer A 499 493 522 Reviewer B 561 465 507 Reviewer C 462 314 454 Reviewer D 554 476 534 Reviewer E 515 428 543 Reviewer F 367 261 246 Total Score 2958 2437 2806 3480 Points Maximum Average Score 493 406 468 580 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 16,519 20,525 17,202 Man-hours + 5,951 electlinstr sub 100% Design Completion Proposed 83 82 60 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $2.208,810 $2,435,000 $1,959,410 + $250.000 "Options" $2,209,410 Total Fee c _ Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 May 10, 2000 (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that the District has again received an award for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and that Julie Matsamoto also received an award for leading this effort. As reported at last month's FAHR Committee meeting, the District's short-term portfolio holds two FINOVA Capital notes ($475,000)which were downgraded to BBB+ on the last day of the month. Both securities met the District's credit quality requirements when PIMCO purchased them in October 1999, and January 2000. However, the current downgraded securities are technically non-compliant with respect to credit quality. Staff has monitored and evaluated PIMCO's position in these securities with both PIMCO and Callan Associates, the District's investment advisor. Both firms recommend that the FINOVA securities continue to be held and monitored, as the notes are due to mature in October(less than six months), and the District would receive full payment of principal at maturity. The Committee members agreed with staffs recommendation. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources, reported that the first negotiating meeting with the SPMT group is scheduled for Thursday, May 11, 2000. Additional details will be discussed in closed session. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that both Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach have scheduled meetings to discuss the development of a media action plan that will address beach closures for the summer. Blake Anderson announced that Ms. Tuchman has submitted, and he has accepted with regret, her resignation as Director of Communications. She will be leaving the District at the end of the month to join Nelson Communications. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff had no report. (11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-g) a. FAHR00-32: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000. b. FAHROD-33: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR00-34: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of May 1, 2000. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting v' Page 4 May 10, 2000 d. FAHROD-35: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. e. FAHR00-36: Recommend that the Board of Directors receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2000. f. FAHR00-37: Recommend that the Board of Directors receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending March 31, 2000. g. FAHROD-38: Recommend that the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98.33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 11(a)through (g) under Consent Calendar. (12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-g) a. FAHR00-39: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for. (1) Create Accounting Supervisor classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86,064); (2) Create Human Resources Supervisor classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86-064); (3) Create Lead Pump Power Operator at pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883); and, (4) Change the title of Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Gullixson opposed. b. FAHROO-40: Direct staff to work with member agencies to evaluate the potential to collect Capital Facilities Capacity Charges(CFCC) for high- demand users in two phases: when building permits are issued, and when tenant improvement permits are issued. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve. C. FAHROO-41: Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities Capacity Charge rate and structure until the Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Program is modified. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. y Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 May 10, 2000 d. FAHROO-42: (1) Implement Sewer Service Charge rates for 2000-01 equal to those previously adopted for Revenue Area 3. These rates will be based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year and the percentages adopted in Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Previously adopted higher rates in other Revenue Areas may be implemented as needed in the future; and, (2) Implement previously adopted Sewer Service Charge rates in Revenue Area 7. The base single-family residential rate will be $73 per year. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Directors Gullixson and Leyes opposed. e. FAHROO-43: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD Amending Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06, Relating to Source Control Permit User Fees, setting the rates for 2000-01. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Gullixson voted no. I. FAHROO-44: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-_, Amending Table B of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. g. FAHROO-45: Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total contracts by$200,000, from $1,000,000 to$1,200,000 for remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and approve funding in the amount of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (13) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHROO-46: 2000-01 Budget Status Controller Mike White presented the proposed 2000-01 Joint Operating Budget and explained the changes. David Ludwin presented the proposed Capital Improvement Program budget for the coming year. The final documents will be presented to the FAHR Committee at its June meeting and submitted to the Board for approval at its June 28 regular meeting. b. FAHROO47: Update on COP Restructuring Financial Manager Steve Kozak updated the members on the status and Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting � Page 6 May 10, 2000 development of the approved two-phase financing plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing COP long-term debt. He also reported that all three municipal bond rating agencies, Moody's, S&P and Fitch, awarded "Aa" category credit ratings to the District. This allows the District to move forward with final structuring and issuance of the Series 2000 COPS, and with substitution of modernized bond documents for the 1992 and 1993 COPS. Mr. Kozak also reported that Director Swan had contacted staff and requested that his support for issuing the Series 2000 Refunding COPS as variable rate debt, and including the issuance of an additional $150 million reimbursement financing piece with the Series 2000 Refunding COPS. Director Boyd expressed concern about the competitive bidding process for underwriters. Staff will review its practices and consider bidding all issues. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the report; to recommend a financing of the $150 million reimbursement but as an issue separate from the current refunding issue. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 14, 2000 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported that the Committee would meet in Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider labor negotiations with Local 501 and SPMT Units. The Committee convened in dosed session at 7:40 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item No. 17(a)(1). At 8:30 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 7 May 10, 2000 (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m. Submitted by: Jea appan FA Committee Assistant Secretary IYcb,WbiMp.MWmnl951�N9lLl5ILm Ov.4 FNfA MWOz FAHR COMMITTEE MeeDngDdte I Toed.ofl) 05/10/00 1 05/24/0D AGENDA REPORT h�eem Numbe ,tam Numbr r P!l Nt UMW Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000, SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy, The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) %V dWM nll ,dWNn2labane`FAHRWahQ000% lTmasmafs Repml-Mey.dw Re . MM Page i i . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios forthe reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Amounts Apr0 30,2000 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 29,921,844 6.0 Union Bank Checking Account 462,327 — Union Bank Overnight Repumhase Agreement 7,883,000 5.4 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 19,786,778 5.9 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 349,150,617 3.9 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,038 5.8 Debt Service Reserves Q Trustees 32,157,809 6.7 Petty Cash 8,000 — TOTAL $439,372,413 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report %WdO WaUlW. dlMnVIO0 anoTAHRTah Wa MaavelS ReNd-Wy m R..d: 6/M Page 2 Prepared by Finance, 0 ReportMonthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances $450,000,001 , , , , , , , , muimi muuui IIIIIIIIII $350,000,000 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ����� iiiii-iiiii� :�:�:•:�i :❖:•:�i i❖:❖i :�:;:;:;:; ❖:❖:•i ❖:❖:•i Nov, 99 Dec, 99 Jan, 11 Feb, 11 Mar, 11 Apr, 11 s Debt Service Reserves EGLAIF u 3 Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash 0 . GO Bond MONTHLY REPORT ��- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 30 April 1000) Liquid Operating Mottles(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $19,796,609 • Mellon $19,786,778 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $19,813,174 • Mellon $19,812,946 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $45,966 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 63% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": See Note 15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" See Note 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.50 0.47 3 Months: 1.59 1.38 12 Months: 5.60 5.10 Year-to-Date: 2.04 1.82 Commentary • Interest rates athe shorvend of the yield curve fell slightly in April(three-month T-Bills down 7 basis points to 5.81%),while the lonji posted increases. • The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 3 basis points in April. • PIMCO's emphats on commercial paper slightly enhanced resume. • NOTE: On March 31",S&P downgraded Finvva Capital Corp.from A-to BBB+with a Stable Outlook,due to the parent company's(Finova Group,Inc.)announcement ofa special accounting chase to comings. A Finova Capital Corporate Note,$475,000 par amount.6.375%coupon,maturing on October 15.2000,1s held in the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio. Thenotecomprisesabout2A%ofthe newly$20 million portfolio. PIMCO's credit teem hm analysed the Finova credit and reported on April 27e: "Our credit seem is satisfied to a large degree th s there is not a systemic problem with the Company's low book. Our recommendation is that we continue to hold this security." x:t..vmexre_.wcvisco u0oaw wr MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7NVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 April 2000) Lang-Term Operating Montes(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $349,252,256 • Mellon $349,150,617 Historical Cost: $351,492,689 • PIMCO $352,445,006 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.10 Of Index: 2.29 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( ain/loss)oft%Change: $7,402,254 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repot: (gee attached schedule) O°A 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 37% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes n PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.27 0.07 3 Months: 1.89 1.57 12 Months: 3.46 2.79 Year-to-Date: 1.90 1.34 Commentary While short< d yields(one-year and less)fell slightly in March(three-month T-Bills down 7 basis points to 5.81%),yields on longer maturities incte°sed(fiveyear Tttasury Notes up 22 basis points W 6.54%),posting the U.S.Treasury market's Brst negative mW mtum of the year. The Lons-Team portfolio outperformed in benchmark by 20 basis points In April. PIMCO's decision to maintain a below index duration added to portfolio returns a rates reset. PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage securities added to ttler"rcmms as mortgages outperformed all other sectors. N.�...IFlHAM'.E\°Ial,.I efl'ISFD LIWW aPT Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE I BASE. USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-APR-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 7,663,330.50 2,663,350.50 13.33% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,476,569.44 4476,569.44 12.39% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS TUN IYR 2,672,046.25 2,672,046.25 13.37% 0.00 FED RM LOAN BNE.-LESS THN IYR 1,791,76&00 1,791,768.00 8.97% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 113,668.42 113,66&42 0.57% 0.00 TOTAL UNTIED STATES 9,717,402.61 9,717,402.61 48.63% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �,7 M 9,7 , 02. 48.63% OW FIRED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 3,493,457.03 3,496,315.00 17.45% 2,857.97 U.S.AGENCIES 999,200.00 1,000,000.00 5.00% 800.00 ADS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 900,738.00 4.51% -5,175.00 BANKING&FINANCE 1,670,528.50 1,665,982.00 8.34% 4,546.50 INDUSTRIAL 2,028,520.00 2,013,500.00 10.08% -15,020.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,945.00 496,275.00 2.49% 430.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 512,080.00 506,565.00 2.54% -5,515.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,095,543.53 10,069,375.00 50.39% -26,169.53 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10,095,543.53 10,069,375.00 50.39% OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 195,881.05 195,881.05 0.99% 0.00 TOTAL 195,881.05 195,881.05 0.98% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 195,881.05 195$81.05 0.98% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 20,009,927.19 19,982,658.66 I011.00% -26,168M 09-May2000 9.3S.14 E,,W,w Nanlbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -1,049,225.94 -1,049,225.94 -0.30% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 10,422,001.91 10,422,001.91 2.96% 0.00 PAYABLES -46,243,762.42 .46,243,762.42 -13.12% 0.00 TOTAL -36,970,986.45 -36,870,986.45 -10.46% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 51,769,148.61 51,769,149.61 14.69% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 12,659,241.77 12,659,241.77 3.59% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 64.428.390.38 64,428,390.38 18.29% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 27,557,403.93 27,557,403.93 7.82% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 98,637,928.17 99,372,486.57 27.92% -265,441.60 U.S.AGENCIES 60,156,088.60 59,135,849.84 16.78% .1,020,238.76 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 35,227,462.99 34,996,869.15 9.93% -230,593.83 ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,432,290.48 3,391,990.45 0.96% 40,400.03 FHLMC POOLS 9,100,791.20 8,899,844.14 2.53% -200,947.06 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,857,023.28 7,594,089.62 2.160/a -262.933.66 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 37,234.75 37,176.30 0.01% -58.45 ABS:HOME EQUITY 353,512.05 351,854.09 0.100/0 -1,657.97 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 2,667,495.38 2,665,640.% 0.76% -1,844.42 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 986,720.00 0.28% .13,280.00 BANKING&FINANCE 76,398,260.81 75,896,334.43 21.54% -501,926.38 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,786,344.35 1.93% -339,844.65 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,096,090.00 7,883,680.00 2.24% -212,400.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,294,233.00 2.07% -5,767.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,300,200.00 2.07% -197,055.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 324,887,601.70 321,593,212.89 91.27% -3,294,388.81 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 324,887,601.70 32 1,593,212.89 91.27% -3�294,399.8I 09-Map2000 9:38:10 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PLMCO % UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,205,885.89 3,205,995.89 0.91% 0.00 TOTAL 3,205,885.89 3,205,895.89 0.91% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,205,885.89 3,205,89: $ 0.91% 0.06 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 355,650,891.52 352,356,502.71 100.00% -3,294,388.81 09-May-1000 9:38.l0 Emcuftw Wm*bemh YI.DANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t I OCSF03511302 2000/04/30 RON DATE t 05/04/00 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RON TINE , 13.12.55 PAN VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARXET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HARNEY VALUE E TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 113,668.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE NGHT .000 5.353 AAA 100.000 113,668.42 1.16 996085247 AAA 113,669.42 .57 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.092 .000 P-1 98.947 2,077,894.58 21.38 31358OWSO HAT 05/11/2000 A-1+ 2,077,894.58 10.50 1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR CONS DISC N 5.907 .000 P-1 99.543 1,791,768.00 10.43 313384XFI HAT 05/24/2000 A-1+ 1,791,768.00 9.06 900,000.00 GOLDHAN SACHS GROUP L P DISC 6.008 .000 P-1 98.699 880,200.25 9.14 38142TE04 05/24/2000 088,288.25 4.49 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN RIG CORP DISC 6.082 .000 P-1 99.D63 2,476,569.44 25.48 313396YJ6 HAT 06/20/200D A-l♦ 2,476,569.44 12.52 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.109 .000 P-1 98.710 888,392.25 9.14 36959HPU6 06/28/2000 888,392.25 4.49 600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIG ASSN DISC NTS 6.210 .000 P-1 99.025 594,151.67 6.11 3135BOYDI HAT 06/15/99 A-1+ 594,151.67 3.00 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 6.293 .000 P-1 98.519 006,670.00 9.12 63743CG56 07/05/2000 006,670.00 4.40 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.957 .107 9,717,402.61 100.00 9,717,402.61 49.11 FIXED INCURS SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN HIG CORD DEES .000 4.705 AAA 100.000 999,200.00 9.93 3134A3RT5 PUTS AT 05/16/2000 DD 05/18/99 AAA 1,000,000.00 5.05 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.112 5.145 AAA 99.609 3,493,457.03 34.62 9120274Q2 05.1258 00/31/2000 DO 08/31/90 AAA 3,486,315.00 13.62 475,000.00 ASSOC IATE3 CORP NORTH AMER 6.296 6.006 AA3 99.895 474,273.25 4.71 046003EL9 6.000% 06/15/2000 A+ 474,501.25 2.40 900,000.00 FOND HIS CR HIN 4 TR 00538 6.312 7.014 A2 100.O82 905,913.00 8.94 345402YKI 3.020% 10/10/2000 DO 10/10/95 A 900,738.00 4.55 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 MSF07511102 2000/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/00 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL 400,000.00 LERMAN BROS NLDGS MTN TR 00252 6.353 6.416 A3 99.745 400,216.00 3.96 52510PLMI 6.400% O9/30/200D DO 09/26/97 A 398,980.00 2.02 900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORD NTS 6.425 9.458 A2 101.339 922,860.00 9.05 370442ANB 9.625% 12/01/2000 DD 12/01/90 A 912,051.00 4.61 150,000.00 MORGAN G P 6 CO MTN SR 00043 6.430 6.146 Al 99.656 149,625.00 1.40 61687YBU0 6.125% 10/02/2000 DO 10/02/97 AA 149,484.00 .36 600,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 6.534 6.502 A3 99.964 599,760.00 5.95 812404MI 6.500% 06/15/2000 OD O6/13/95 A- 599,784.00 3.03 SOOoOOO.00 BURLINGTON ME INC NT 6.538 9.593 A3 100.333 505,900.00 4.98 122014AB9 9.625% 06/15/2000 DO 06/28/90 A- 501,665.00 2.54 500,000.00 GTE CORD DEB 6.669 9.254 BAA1 1U1.313 512,080.00 5.03 362320A06 9.335% 12/01/200D A 506,565.00 2.56 475,000.00 FIRMA CAP CORD 6.820 6.441 BAA1 98.969 473,031.25 4.66 318024AF8 6.305% 30/15/2U00 DO 10/11/95 BBB. 470,102.75 2.38 175,000.00 CIT GROUP SLUGS MTV 0 SR 00010 6.862 5.693 Al 98.808 173,303.00 1.01 12560QAK5 5.6258 02/02/2001 DO 02/02/96 A. 112,914.00 .87 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 4TR OD006 6.999 6.216 A3 99.255 495,045.00 4.92 90269QAF6 6.170% 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/90 A- 496,275.00 2.51 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.332 6.019 10,095,543.53 100.00 10,069,375.00 50.90 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.533 4.060 19,812,946.14 100.00 19,786,000.61 100.00 a m YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OcSr07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00 DISTRICT: LOHG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RABBET TDTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 996085247 AAA .00 .00 5,900,ODO.00 FEDERAL NATL RIG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.859 .000 P-1 99,001 5,041,065.55 9.06 313588NA3 NATURES 05/04/2000 A-1♦ 5,841,065.55 1.51 7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.009 .000 P-1 90.682 6,907,055.56 10.72 36959HER9 05/19/2000 6,902,255.56 1.09 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISC NTS 6.029 .000 P-1 98.858 4,349,737.33 6.35 313588YD1 NAT 06/15/99 A-1+ 4,349,737.33 1.13 2,700,000.00 EASTHAN RODAA CO DISC 6.041 .000 P-1 98.823 2,668,209.75 4.14 22746AEJ4 05/18/2000 2,668,209.75 .69 600,000.00 USAA CAP CORD DISC 6.054 .000 P-1 99.607 591,642.00 .91 90328AF65 06/06/2000 591,642.00 .15 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISCOUNT 6.056 .000 P-1 98.338 2,468,438.89 3.03 313588YL3 HAT 06122/200D A-1+ 2,468,438.89 .64 5,300,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 6.070 .000 P-1 99.043 5,249,482.17 8.14 02225AEC2 05/12/2000 5,249,482.17 1.36 4,7OO,000.DO USAA CAP CORP DISC 6.086 .000 P-1 99.079 4,656,701.25 3.22 90328AEF6 05/15/2000 4,656,701.25 1.21 3,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 6.OB6 .000 P-1 98.913 3,264,130.83 5.06 74231RFE2 06/14/2000 3,264,130.03 .85 3,500,ODO.DO BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.082 .000 P-1 99.062 7,429,650.00 11.53 O1588RF26 06/02/2000 7,429,650.00 1.92 5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.100 .000 P-1 99.177 5,157,179.44 8.00 00SOOMNI 05/22/2000 5,157,179.44 1.34 10,400,000.00 HEINS R J CO DISC 6.101 .000 P-I 99.160 10,312,611.11 16.00 42307JF62 06/06/2000 10,312,612.11 2.69 400,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 6.153 .000 P-1 98.584 394,334.61 .61 61166AFE4 06/14/2000 394,334.67 .10 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 4 OCSF07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE S 05/04/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME S 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARRY VALUE % TOTAL 5,200,000.00 GNAC DISC 6.261 .000 P-1 98.393 5,137,451.03 3.97 37042DFU2 06/20/2000 5,137,451.83 1.33 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.024 .000 64,428,390.30 100.00 64,428,390.39 16.69 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS IN HE CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.736 Al 100.339 1,992,000.00 .62 066365DN4 FLED RT D5/1112003 DD 05/11/90 A- 2,006,79O.DO .52 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC NTN #TR00615 .000 6.143 Al 100.015 3,498,635.00 1.08 171200EBO FLTG AT O8/09/2002 DO 04/08/98 A. 3,500,525.00 .91 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEER .000 6.179 Al 100.043 2,994,300.00 .93 2D9111CU5 FLED RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 3,001,290.00 .78 330,573.95 FULMC GROUP #78-6064 .ODD 6.443 AAA 99.016 322,516.21 .10 31348SNK3 6.3841 01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA 327,321.10 .08 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL ME .000 6.242 A2 99.303 1,992,580.00 .62 345397RV FITS RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/90 A 1,994,060.00 .52 2,000,000.DO FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 6.215 A2 99.921 1,990,613.60 .62 345397WB FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,420.00 .52 3,000,OOD.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL LAN GHANA .000 6.362 A2 99.812 3,OOD,000.00 .93 345397SRS FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,994,360.00 .DB 3,ODO,000.00 GMAC MIN FLTG RT .000 6.523 A2 100.312 3,010,830.00 .93 32042NVR9 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 A 3,009,36D.DD .38 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MEN ACCEP 4TR 00562 .000 6.270 A2 99.828 2,996,43D.OD .93 37042WZKO FLTG AT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 2,994,84D.00 .38 3,950,000.00 GNAC ME FLIG RT .000 5.560 A2 10D.132 3,918,768.50 1.22 30042SOVS 08/18/2003 DO O0/17/98 A 3,955,214.00 1.02 2,702,019.71 GNHA DID REMIC TR 2000-9 FR .000 6.403 AAA 98.642 2,702,019.71 .82 3633H4NX9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,665,326.29 .69 2,000,0OO.OD HELLER FINANCIAL INC ME .000 6.487 A3 100.314 2,000,000.00 .62 423328BX8 MEG RT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,006,280.00 .52 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSM7522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/00 DISTRICT: SANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ R TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTN OTR 00246 .000 6.338 A3 99.406 3,000,000.00 .92 42333BLFI FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,982,180.00 .II 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO HTN .000 6.390 A2 100.663 4,000,000.00 1.25 44191KEAS FLTG AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 A 4,026,520.00 1.04 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 000520 .000 5.322 A2 100.3I5 999,190.90 .31 44181M8T4 FLTG AT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,003.I50.00 .26 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00333 .000 7.127 A3 100.879 2,322,379.00 .02 52517PPWS FLTG AT 04/01/2D02 DO 03/29/99 A 2,320,217.00 .60 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS SLOGS MTN .000 6.666 A3 100.109 5,000,000.00 1.55 52517PQQ3 FLTG AT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A 5,005,450.00 1.30 1.700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 4TR 00311 .000 6.166 AA3 99.984 1,699,517.20 .52 61745ENY3 FLTG AT 01/28/2002 DO O1127100 A4 1,699.320.00 .44 I.000,000.00 OLD SENT BM MTN SB 00001 .000 3.084 100.000 7,000,000.00 2.17 6I982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 1,DDD,DOO.00 1.81 3.300,000.00 CHECK INC NEW HT .000 6.966 A2 99.921 7,300,000.00 2.26 682680102 FLTG AT 04/24/2D02 DO 04/24/00 A 7.294,233.00 1.89 2,673,220.65 STUDENT IN NEW ASSN 98-2 Al .000 6.006 AAA 99.716 2,667,485.38 .82 I8442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 AAA 2,665,640.96 .69 8,686,998.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.702 3.632 AAA 99.797 8.65].5]8.19 2.69 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 AAA 8,669,363.39 2.25 24,630,470.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.029 3.503 AAA 95.344 23,793,646.16 7.37 9129212M3 3.3758 01115/2DOI DD 01/15/97 AAA 23.329,980.02 6.15 1,008,450.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 4.337 4.162 AAA 102.125 1,001,370.00 .32 9128275WO 4.2508001/15/2010 DO 01/15/00 AAA 1,029,879.56 .23 1,950.I19.40 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY SLOGS IMF 4.696 3.709 RAI 98.405 1,816,818.61 .56 79549BMI 3.650% 02/14/2002 DD D2/14/97 A 1,821,200.43 .47 4.GOD.000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN IM 00299 5.170 5.467 RAI 99.875 3,997,780.00 1.24 61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 Af 3,995,000.00 1.03 2.100.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.405 AAA 99.531 2,167,321.15 .64 912823854 D6.3354 09/3D/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,090,151.00 .54 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 6 O SM7522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIM t 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARIRT VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR SYS 5.650 6.643 AA3 97.043 1,543,215.00 .45 046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 A- 1,467,645.00 .38 11000,000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.I60 5.095 A3 93.548 999,730.00 .30 42333HEJO 5.7501 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/99 A- 015,480.00 .25 2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HTN 5.604 6.364 A3 96.687 2,060,739.00 .60 812400GM6 6.5401 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 A- 1,938,574.35 .50 23,430,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.807 5.303 AAA 90.562 23,351,209.95 7.18 912027501 05.625% 09/30/2001 DD 09/30/11 AAA 23,093,076.60 5.98 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.011 6.299 AAA 99.219 5,096,4D2.25 1.54 9128222L5 06.250E 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 AAA 4,960,950.00 1.29 3,000,000.00 SEARS RORBUCN ACCEP CORP MTN 5.049 6.803 A3 97.453 3,O73,170.00 .90 B12400JAI 6.6301 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 2,923,590.00 .76 421,531.00 FSLMC MULTICL HTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.933 99.437 420,939.01 .13 3133T02D5 5.900E 06/15/2017 419,150.59 .11 25,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSM ME 5.991 5.900 AAA 9B.516 14,955,300.00 4.59 31364G2V0 5.8201 07/19/2001 DD 07/19/99 AAA 14,III,400.00 3.03 2,500,000.00 NERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.463 AA3 90.630 2,526,725.00 .06 59018SXP4 6.3751 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,465,925.00 .64 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.164 AA2 97.336 7,497,255.00 2.27 079067MS 6.000E 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 ARA 7,300,200.00 1.89 12,500,000.00 PTDENAL HOHB LH HTG CORD DEES 6.062 6.061 AAA 99.000 12,405,625.00 3.B4 3134A32M1 6.0001 0I/20/2DOI DD 07/20/99 AAA 12,375,000.00 3.21 2,OOO,OOO.00 SANRBOSTON CORP SR SYS 6.133 6.286 A2 97.436 11999,600.00 .60 06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,948,720.00 .50 37,234.76 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.210 AAA 99.843 37,234.75 .01 31633EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 3I,3I6.30 .01 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC HTH BTR 00004 6.201 6.283 A3 98.632 1,000,000.00 .30 73317PAD1 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BBB. 906,720.00 .26 2,443,550.75 PHUNC HULTICLASS CTF 2146 OT 6.20I 6.202 AAA 96.750 2,400,414.67 .73 3133TNRU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,364,143.09 .61 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I OCSF07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/00 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMC 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARRET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 353,512.D5 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.320 AAA 99.531 3S3,S12.05 .10 3935052Y3 6.2906 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 351,054.08 .09 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MIN 6.291 6.329 AAA 99.453 4,488,I05.00 1.33 31364CZV5 6.230% 03/01/2D02 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,430,385.00 1.15 3,031,466.18 FRLMC MILTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.339 AAA 96.192 3,034,761.60 .90 3133ME95 VAR AT 00/15/2032 AAA 2,916,027.95 .76 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.929 A2 93.411 2,031,960.00 .60 073902MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 1,948,220.00 .SO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN GNMA I SF 6.371 6.606 AAA 90.793 5,755,059.38 1.76 OIN0606SO 6.000% 05/15/2029 AAA 5,674,012.50 1.47 2,000,000.00 PNLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.961 AAA 94.730 2,000,888.00 .58 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2010 AAA 1,094,760.00 .49 11,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN GNMA II ARM 6.501 6.559 AAA 99.094 11,13I,1U9.38 3.46 16HO62651 6.500% 05/20/2030 AAA 11,140,075.00 2.09 2,422,538.43 FNLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.523 7.291 AAA 82.295 2,266,399.49 .61 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 1,993,619.04 .52 21,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.603 6.514 AAA 99.281 21,276,109.37 6.63 912027Z62 06.500% 10/15/2006 DO 10/15/96 AAA 21,353,134.OD 5.53 5,000,000.00 SALONON 6B RIDGE NTN 6.625 6.625 AA3 100.000 5,000,000.00 1.55 7954SEEES FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 5,000,000.00 1.30 0,643,224.62 FRLMC GROUP 405-0476 6.628 3.050 AAA 99.182 8,330,274.99 2.66 312ODDQSS 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 8,572,523.04 2.22 1,931,053.73 GNMA II POOL 4080088N 6.705 6.329 AAA 100.734 1,973,295.53 .60 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 UD 06/01/97 AAA 2,945,227.66 .50 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOW LN RIG CORP DEW 6.711 6.556 AAA 96.094 10,323,075.00 3.13 3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/02/99 AAA 10,099,970.00 2.61 2,000,000.00 RARER 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.086 A2 96.209 1,992,280.00 .59 531748A08 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,924,190.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CN CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.969 A2 96.172 2,995,D80.00 .89 345397SJS 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A+ 2,885,160.00 .75 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSP07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE S 05/0410D DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 1 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL 900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BE CONS BDS 6.777 6.789 AAA 99.422 099,550.00 .27 3133MAQJ1 6.750E 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 894,798.00 .23 2,500,OOD.00 COUNTRYWIDE ROM LNS INC NT 6.866 7.165 A3 95.604 2,498,400.00 .74 22237UMS 6.850E 06/15/2004 DO O6/24/99 A 2,390,100.00 .62 21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 6.985 6.937 AAA 93.703 20,367,968.75 6.26 OIN062656 6.500E 05/15/2030 AAA 20,146,171.80 5.22 1,435,224.05 GNRA II POOL 40080023 6.992 7.069 AAA 200.797 1,450,994.95 .44 36225CAE9 7.125E 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,446,662.79 .37 2,000,000.00 GNNA GIG REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 7.075 AAA 98.944 1,996,075.00 .61 3937N3C70 7.ODOE 12/20/2022 AAA 1,978,880.00 .51 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DENS 7.113 6.945 AAA 95.391 2,030,133.00 .62 31359MEYS 6.625E 09/15/2D09 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,003,211.00 .52 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF HIS 7.262 7.904 ASK 100.203 2,823,125.00 .62 OIN080658 8.000E 05/15/2030 RAN 2,004,060.00 .52 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.635 BAA3 94.961 2,151,250.OD .SR 542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD D3/28/93 A- 1,899,220.00 .49 1,337,791.05 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA 995-7 9.564 7.540 AAA 98.539 1,298,538.95 .40 398109AE4 7.430E O6/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 1,290,538.95 .34 I,ODO,DOO.00 FORD MOTOR CA CO NT 7.582 7.062 A2 95.576 965,170.00 .29 345397GV9 6.750E 05/15/2005 A 955,760.00 .25 975,189.95 WNP/MUNTOON PAIGE 0000-1I150 7.684 7.667 AAA 97.828 954,009.07 .29 302998GE3 7.500E 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 954,009.07 .25 3,000,OD0.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN CTR 00115 7.709 7.341 A2 99.439 2,950,530.OD .92 69512BRUS 7.300E 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 2,983,170.00 .77 9,600,OOO.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 7.966 8.925 AAA 140.062 13,314,211.20 4.18 912RIDDL9 12.500E O0/15/2014 DO O8/15/84 AAA 13,445,952.00 3.48 1,600,000.OD ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 8.253 Al 96.590 1,594,032.00 .48 020002AL5 7.875E OS/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,545,440.00 .40 288,590.00 GNMA POOL #0479288 7.968 7.971 AAA 100.359 209,627.12 .09 36209MDI 8.000E 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/OD AAA 289,627.12 .00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 MSPOIS22202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00 DIETRICTf LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 1 13.12.55 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY HARNET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARRET VALUE S TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -- ---------- 338,310.00 GNMA FCOL #0479289 7.966 7.971 AAA 100.359 339,525.80 .10 36209RNE9 8.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 339,525.80 .09 335,990.00 GNNA POOL #0522128 7.960 7.971 AAA IDO.359 337,197.46 .10 3621LU54 0.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 337,197.46 .09 404,685.00 GNNA POOL #0524743 7.968 7.905 AAA 100.187 406,139.34 .12 36211VSCO B.0008 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 405,441.76 .11 325,600.00 GNNA POOL #0528728 7.969 7.571 AAA 100.359 326,770.13 .10 362128LR4 0.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 326,770.13 .09 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCONE SECURITIES 3.007 5.954 324,987,601.70 IDD.DD 321,593,212.89 03.33 -- ---- ------- ----------- --------- TOTAL 3.907 5.739 389,315,992.08 100.00 386,021,603.27 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000 -30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINB.OSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 MAR WIRE FEES 05-Apr-2000 -5.95 NA9123459 0.00 CW 05-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 MAR WIRE FEES 05-Apr-2000 -11.05 NA9123459 0.00 C W 05-Apr-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 03-Apr-2000 -5,157,179.44 0758BRENI 0522r2000 03-Apr-2000 5,157,179.44 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 03-Apr-2000 5,157,179.44 07588RENi 0522/2000 03-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 247.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 -247.13 9%085247 04-Apr-2000 247.13 B 0.00 09-May-1000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETEL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINBAWS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 247.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 -247.13 9%085247 04-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 04-Apr-20D0 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Apr.2000 -800,000.00 9936SA600 05.950%04/05/2000 DD 04/041 04-Apr-2000 800,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS ING NEW YORK 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Apr-2000 -800,000.0D 99368A600 05.950%04/052000 DO 04/0// 04-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 04-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,209.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr.2000 -8,209.50 996095247 05-Apr-2000 8,209.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,209.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 -8,209.50 996095247 05-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 05-Apr-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 227,673.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Apr-2000 -227,673.78 996085247 07-Apr-2000 227,673.78 B 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 227,673.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Apr-2000 -227,673.79 996085247 07-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 07-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8.53:59 Executive lyorkbe h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAQ, OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Apr-2000 -4,349,737.33 313588YD1 MAT 06/15199 07-Apr-2000 4,349,73733 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,400,OW.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Apr-2000 4,349,737.33 313588YDI MAT06/IS/99 07-Apr-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Apr-2000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Apr-2000 -2,468,438.89 313588YL3 MAT 061MODO 07-Apr-2000 2,468,438.89 B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Apr-2000 -2,468,438.89 313588YL3 MAT 06/=000 07-Apr-20W 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC.NEW YORK 07-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,500,000.W BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Apr-2000 -7,429,650.00 07588RF26 06/022000 07-Apr-2000 7,429,650.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,500,000.00 BECfON DICKINSON DISC 07-Apr-2000 -7,429,650.00 07588RF26 0607J20W 07-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 44,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-2000 -44,920.00 996085247 10-Apr-2000 44,920.00 B 0.00 09-May-20W 8:53:59 Fs cuff a Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS600010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 44,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr.2000 44,920.00 996085247 10-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 10-Apr-2000 -886,670.00 63743CG56 07/052000 10-Apr-2000 886,670.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 10-Apr.2000 -886,670.00 63743CG56 07/052000 10-Apr.2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 10-Apr-2000 -3,264,130.83 74271RFE2 06/142000 10-Apr-2000 3,264,130.83 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 10-Apr-2000 -3,264,130.83 74271RFE2 06/142000 10-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11,607.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2000 -11,607.75 996085247 12-Apr-2000 11,607.75 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11,607.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2000 -11,607.75 996085247 12-Apr.2000 0.00 FC 12-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Moy-1000 8.53:59 &s curiw tf'wkb..4 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEr COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Apr-2000 -899.392.25 36959HFU6 06282000 12-Apr-2000 $88,392.25 B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Apr-2000 498,392.25 36959HFU6 062Y1000 12-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 12-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,407.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Apr.2000 -12,407.72 996085247 13-Apr-2000 12,407.72 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO I2,407.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Apr-2000 -12,407.72 996085247 13-Apr-2000 OAO FC 13-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,907.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2000 -1,807.60 996095247 14-Apr-2000 1,807.60 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,807.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2000 -1,307.60 996085247 14-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 14-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,14063 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -15,140.63 996085247 17-Apr-2000 15,140.63 B 0.00 09-My-2000 8:53:59 Ewcurim w&4Uwh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG0ool0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,140.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -15,140.63 996085247 17-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,181,503.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -1,181,503.67 996085247 17-Apr-2000 1,181,503.67 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,181,503.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -1,181,503.67 996085247 17-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,785.29 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Apr-2000 -7,785.29 996087094 17-Apr-2000 7,785,29 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,400,000.00 HEINZ H 1 CO DISC 17-Apr-2000 -10,312,611.11 42,307JF62 06/062000 17-Apr-2000 10,312,611.11 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,400,000.00 HEINZ H 1 CO DISC 17-Apr-2000 -10,312,611.11 42307JF62 06/062000 17-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 -3,655,156.00 37042DFU2 06282000 17-Apr-2000 3,655,156.00 B GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE,D 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Eremim Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOGDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 17-Apo-2000 -3,655,156.00 37042DFU2 0628200D 17-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE,D 17-Apr-2000 0.D0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 73,806.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apo-2000 -73.806.49 996085247 18-Apr2000 73,806.49 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 73,806.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-200D -73,8D6.49 996095247 18-Apr-200D 0.00 FC 18-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I8-Apr-2000 -594,131.67 313599YDI MAT 06/15/99 18-Apr-2000 594,151.67 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISC N 18-Apr.2000 -594,ISI.67 31359SYDI MAT 06t15N9 18-Apr-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES NEW YORK 18-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO I,500,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 19-Apr-2000 -1,482,295.83 37042DFU2 06/282000 19-Apr-2000 1,482,295.83 B GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 19-Apr-2000 -1,482.295.93 37042DFU2 06282000 19-Apr.2000 0.00 FC GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CO 19-Apr-2000 0.00 09-M,0,2000 8:53:59 Executive Wmkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,666.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 20-Apr-2000 -11,666.41 996097094 20-Apr-2000 11,666.41 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 20-Apr-2000 .2,100,000.00 99369PS81 05-770%04242000 DD 04120/ 20-Apr-2000 2,100,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 20-Apr-2000 -2,100,000.00 99368P581 05.770%0424/2000 DO 04/20/ 20-Apr-2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Apr.2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 510.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 -510.22 996095247 24-Apr-2000 510.22 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 510.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 -510.22 996095247 24-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 24-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 -3,199,489.78 313384WA3 MAT 04252000 24-Apr-200 3,199,499.78 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 -3,199,489.79 313384WA3 MAT04252000 24-Apr-2000 0.00 - PC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 24-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Ereom4ve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,578.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 -249,578.83 996095247 25-Apr-2000 249,578.83 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 48,064.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03 996085247 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,579.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 -249,579.83 996095247 25-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 48,064.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03 996085247 25-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 -2,476,569.44 313396Y16 MAT 06/20/2000 25-Apr-2000 2,476,569.44 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 -2,476,569.44 313396Y16 MAT 0620/2000 25-Apr-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00 313384WBI MAT 04/26/2000 25-Apr-2000 1,799,714.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 09-M4y2000 8:53:59 Fsecudw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00 313384WRI MAT 04/26CM 25-Apr.2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PBNCO 8,232.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2000 .8,232.00 996085247 26-Apr-2000 9,232.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,232.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2000 .8,232.00 996085247 26-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 26-Apr.2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 -1,791,768.00 313384XFI MAT 05242000 26-Apr-2000 1,791,768.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr.2000 -1,791,768.00 313384XF1 MAT 05242000 26-Apr.2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 26-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,665.10 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 27-Apr-2000 -6,665.10 996087094 27-Apr.2000 6,665.10 B 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 15-Feb-2000 1,302,163.94 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 03-Mer-2000 -1,302,163.94 BC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 09-Mrry-2000 8:53:59 Emcuriw Wwkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' ;I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG60010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 545.47 39810NAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00 IBC 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 1,302,709.41 39810NAE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00 FCC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 03-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 15-Feb-2000 -1,300,357.09 39810NAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/2910 03-Mar-2000 1,300,357.09 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 -544.72 39810NAE4 7.4300/.06/012003 DO 022910 03-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 -1,300,901.81 39810NAE4 7.4309/o 06(012003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 14-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Mu-2000 -10,240,312.50 OIN062649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2000 -9,774,943.75 OING62649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Maj4 90 8:53:39 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-My-2000 -5,662,109.38 OIN060643 6.000%04/15/2029 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600.000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 29-Mu-2000 -611,460.00 812404AEI 6.500%06/152000 DO 06113/9 03-Apr-2000 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 29-Mar-2000 2,007,187.50 OINOB0641 8.000%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 .2,007,187.50 BC SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 404,685.00 GNMA POOL80524743 29-M"-2000 ,406,139.34 36211V5CO 8.000°h04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 406,139.34 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 404,685.00 GNMA POOL80524743 29-MV-2000 -1,618.74 36211 V5CO 8.000%04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 404,685.00 GNMA POOLM0524743 29-Mar-2000 407,758.08 3621IV5CO 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,600.00 GNMA POOL 80528728 29-Mar-2000 -326,770.13 36212BLH4 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/011 19-Apr-2000 326,770.13 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 09-May2000 8:53:59 Ecacuti.WorkbcrrcA Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,600.00 GNMA POOL#0528728 29-Mar-2000 -1,302.40 36212BLH4 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 1B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 325,600.00 GNMA POOLW0528728 29-Mu-2000 -328,072.53 36212BLH4 8.0000/o04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 338,310.00 GNMA POOL80479289 29-Mar-2000 -339,525.80 36209RNE9 8.000%04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 339,525.80 B- SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 338,310.00 GNMA POOL#0479289 29-Mar-2000 -1,353.24 36209RNE9 8.0001.04/15/2030 DO 04101/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 338.310.00 GNMA POOL 80479289 29-Mar-2000 -340,879.04 36209RNE9 8.000%04/152030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,990.00 GNMA POOLA0522128 29-Mar-2000 -337,197.46 3621 ITA54 8.000%04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 337,197.46 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,990.00 GNMA POOLp0522128 29-Mar-2000 -1,343.96 3621 ITA54 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 09-Map2100 8:53:59 Eaecudve Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,990.00 GNMA POOL#0522129 29-Mar-2000 -338,541.42 36211 TA54 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr.2000 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 289,590.00 GNMA POOL80479288 29-Mar-2000 -289,627.12 36209PNDI 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 289,627.12 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 298,590.00 GNMA POOL80479288 29-Mar-2000 .1,154.36 36209RNDI 8.000°/a 04/15/2030 DD 04/011 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 288,590.00 GNMA POOL#0479288 29-Mer-2000 -290,781.48 36209RNDI 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 306,625.00 GNMA POOL 80499734 29-Mer-2000 -307,726.93 36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 307,726.93 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 29-Mar-2000 -1,226.50 36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 306,625.00 GNMA PGOL 80499734 29-Mar-2000 -308,953.43 36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 041011 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Moy-2000 8.53:59 Erecuriw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 31-Mar-2000 -991,420.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 05-Apr-2000 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,843,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 05-Apr-2000 -1,909,535.31 79549BB01 3.650%02114/2002 DO 02/141 10-Apr-2000 1,809,535.31 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,343,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 05-Apr-2000 -10,466.62 79549BBGI 3.650°A02/142002 DD 02/14/ 10-Apr-2000 0.00 111 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,843,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 05-Apr-2000 -1,820,001.93 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 10-Apr-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -3,082,64529 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 3,082,645.29 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -25,813.59 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/ 11-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -3,108,463.89 9128272M3 3,375%01/152007 DO 011151 1I-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I I-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Map2000 8.53:59 &ecutim Wo kbeac6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,133,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -2,053.763.24 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 1I-Apr-2000 2,053,763.24 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,133,790.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr.2000 -17,212.40 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 0.00 IB D.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,133,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX IO-Apr-2000 -2,070,975.64 9128272M3 3.375%0111 5/2 0 0 7 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 11-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr-2000 -2,950,530.00 69512EEU5 7.300%1022/2004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 2,950,530.00 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr.2000 -25,549.99 69512EEU5 7.300%10222004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr-2000 -2,976,079.99 69512EEU5 7.300%101=004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 13-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 .9,945,469.75 OIN062656 6.500%051152030 22-May-2000 9,945,468.75 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 09-McP-2000 8.53:59 aec fm W kbe.h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: l7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 -10,422,500.00 OIN062656 6.500%05/15/2030 22-May-2000 10,422,500.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Apr-2000 -2,023,125.00 OINOS0658 8.0000/005/15/2030 22-May-2000 2,023,125.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA I SF 13-Apr-2000 -5,755,859.38 OIN060650 6.000%05/15/2029 22-May-2000 5,755,859.38 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT I8-Apr-2000 -7,300,000.00 682680A32 FLTG RT 04242002 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2000 7,300,000.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,0*00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 18-Apr-2000 -7,300,000.00 682680A32 FLTG RT 04242002 DO 0424/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 24-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN N SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -173,383.00 12560QAK5 5.625%02/022001 DO 02/0219 25-Apr-2000 173,383.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN N SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -2,269.53 12560QAK5 5,625%021022001 DO 0210219 25-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Erecuriw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 175,000.00 CIT GROUP FLOGS MTN h SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -175,652.53 12560QAK5 5.625%02/02/2001 DO 02/02/9 25-Apr-2000 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDOS MTN 25-Apr-2000 -5,000,000.00 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2000 5,000,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 25-Apr-2000 .5,000,000.00 79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04/282003 DO 0428/ 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 25-Apr.2000 .7,000,000.00 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/012005 DD 0428/0 28-Apr-2000 7,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS MC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 25-Apr.2000 .7,000,000.00 67982XAA6 VAR RT 1 110 1/2 0 0 5 DO 0428/0 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 26-Apr-2000 -1,594,032.00 020002AL5 T875%05/012005 DO 0510110 01-May-2000 1,594,032.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -3,392,828.12 912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DD 101151 28-Apr-2000 3,392,828.12 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 09-May-1000 8.53:59 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEr AMOUNT] SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAR4/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,OW.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -7,949.73 912827Z62 06.500%10/152006DD 10/151 28-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -3,400,677.85 912827Z62 06.500Ye 10/15/2006 DO 101151 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 28-Apr-2000 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,820.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -5,920.00 9128275W8 4.250-/a001/152010 DO 011151 15-Jan-2000 5,820.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,820.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -5,820.00 9128275W8 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 15-Ian-2000 0.00 FC 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 131,240.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan.2000 -131,240.00 9128272M3 3.375%01115/2D07 DD 01/15/ 15-Ian-2000 131,240.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 131,240.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.1an-2000 -131,240.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jan-20W 0.00 FC 28-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Maj 2 00 8:53:59 Ereearro Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,102.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 154m-2000 -50,102.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 071I5/ 15-Jen-2000 50,102.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,102.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.Jen-2000 -50,102.00 9129273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 071I3/ 15-len-2000 0.00 PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,283.30 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -7,293.30 79549BBOI 3.650%02/142D02 DO 02/141 14-Feb-2000 7,293.30 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,283.30 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -7,283.30 79349BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2000 0.00 PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Apr2000 -9.00 3133TCE95 VARRTOB/152032 01-Apr-200D 9.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Apr-2000 -9.00 3133TCE95 VARRTOS/15/=2 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 13-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2000 -12,052.43 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11101/9 01-Apr.2000 12,052.43 PU 0.00 09-Map2000 8:53:59 Emaf/w Wakbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE L PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2000 -12,052.43 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 19-Apr-2000 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -8,941.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr.2000 8,941.75 996085247 03-Apr-2000 -8,941.75 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -8,941.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr.2000 8,941.75 996085247 03-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -162,212.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2000 162,212.85 996035247 03-Apr-2000 -162,212.85 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -162,212.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2000 162.212.85 996085247 03-AM2000 0.00 FC 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 594,780.00 313384VZ9 MAT 04/24/2000 03-Apr.2000 -594,780.00 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 09-Ma 2 00 8:53:59 Erecotiw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE..- 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GARWLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 3,144.50 313384VZ9 MAT 04242000 03-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 597,924.50 313384VZ9 MAT 04242000 03-Apr-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -797.161.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 797,161.93 996085247 04-Apr-2000 -797,161.93 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -797,161.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 797,161.93 996095247 04-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 04-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 5.95 996085247 05-Apr-2000 -5.95 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .5.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 5.95 996085247 05-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 05-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 800,000.00 9936RA600 05.950%04/052000 DO 041041 05-Apr-2000 -800,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 09-May-2000 8.53:59 Eremliw Worlrbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSCr00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 132.22 9936BA600 05.9509/.04/05/2000 DO 04/04/ 05-Apr-20DO 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -M,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 900,132.22 9936SA600 05.950%04/05/2000 DO 04/04/ 05-Apr-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 197,938.20 313588VV4 MAT 0420/2000 05-Apr-2000 -197,938.06 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.14 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,OOD.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 1,570.13 313588VV4 MAT 04202000 05-Apr2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 199,509.33 313588VV4 MAT 04202000 05-Apr-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS MC,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,132.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-20DO 94,132.76 996095247 10-Apr-2000 44,132.76 s 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -84,132.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I O-Apr-2000 84,132.76 996085247 10-Apr-2000 0,00 FC 10-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wokberrch Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,197,299.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 11-Apr-2000 197,299.23 996085247 1I-Apr-2000 -197,299.25 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -197,299.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Apr-2000 197,299.25 996085247 11-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 11-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I I-Apr-2000 4,954,500.00 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 -4,954,694.45 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK -194.45 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I I-Apr-2000 28,320.83 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I i-Apr-2000 4,992,820.83 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK I I-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 2,972,816.66 3133%WH2 MATURES 03/072000 13-Apr-2000 .2,972,816.67 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK .0.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 17,873.34 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 13-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 09-Ma)4000 8:53:59 Erecudw Workbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 2,990,690.00 313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 13-Apo-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 13-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,785.29 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCp 18-Apr-2000 7,785.29 9%087094 18-Apr.2000 -7,785.29 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -89,091.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-2000 99,091.57 996085247 18-Apr.2000 -89,091.57 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,091.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2000 89,091.57 996095247 18-Apr.2000 0.00 FC I B-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -972,270.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CAST I MGMT 19-Apr-2000 972,270.78 996095247 19-Apr-2000 -972,270.78 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -972,270.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2000 972,270.78 996085247 19-Apr.2000 0,00 FC 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -85,860.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2000 85,90.23 996085247 20-Apr-2000 -85,860.25 S 0.00 09-May1000 8:53:59 Executive Workbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATP1 COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -85,860.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2000 85,860.25 996085247 20-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .11,666.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 21-Apr.2000 11,666.41 996087094 21-Apr-2000 -11,666.41 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -93,628.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 93,628.59 996085247 24-Apr-2000 .93,629.59 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -93,628.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 93,628.59 996085247 24-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 24-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr-2000 2,100,000.00 9936SP581 05.770%04/24/2000 DD 04/20/ 24-Apr-2000 -Z100,000m S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr-2000 1,346.33 9936SP581 05.770%04/242000 DO 04/20/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr.2000 2,101,346.33 99368P581 05.770%0424/2000 DO 0420/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8.53:59 Exwwiv ft kbeae8 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCEG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 5,053,7U.33 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 -5,053,788.33 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 39.570.34 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 5,093,358.67 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 24-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,665.10 ESDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 28-Apr.2000 6,665.10 996087094 28-Apr.2000 -k665.10 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO A74,773.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67 996085247 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,474,773.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67 996085247 28-Apr-2000 0.00 PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 5,053,788.33 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 28-Apr-2000 -5,053,788.33 S MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 E..tie Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL. OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 42,896.67 313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 5,096,685.00 313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 4,059,045.56 313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 -4,059,045.56 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 36.922.77 333588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 4,095,969.33 313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Mer-2000 2,075,581.44 912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DD IM51 03-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GREEN WICH CAP MKTS INC,GREE 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 10,431,953.13 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2030 19-Apr-2000 -10,240,312.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 191.640.63 09-Map1000 8:53:59 Executive Wokbeac8 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGOoo/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 10,431,953.13 OIN062649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 9,954,492.19 OIM62649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 -9,774,943.75 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 179,648.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 9,954,492.19 OIN062649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 310,745.27 36210REF3 8.000%04/152030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 -307,726.93 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 3,019.34 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 1,226.50 36210REF3 8.000%04/1 512 0 3 0 DO 04/011 19-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 311,971.77 36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030DD041OI/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY - 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Apr-2000 5,760,253.91 OIN060643 6.000%04/152029 19.Apr-2000 -5,662,109.38 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 98,14C53 O9-May-2000 8:53:59 Fsmmive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Apr-2000 5,760,253.91 OIN060643 6.000-/.04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 4,998,43750 912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-May-2000 -4,967,578.13 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 30,959.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 14,207.65 912827Z62 06.500%10/152006 DO 101151 01-May-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 6,045,609.38 912810DG0 11.875%11/152003 DO 101051 28-Apr-2000 -6,698,250.00 S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -652,640.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 279,910.71 912810DG0 11.875% 11/152003 DO 101051 28-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 6,325,520.09 912810DG0 11.875%11/152003 DO 10/05/ 28-Apr-2000 0.00 FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 28-Apr-2000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 09-May-2000 8.53:59 &cmilm Wo kbeneb Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,748.75 FHLMC GROUP M78-6064 01-Mar-2000 5,748.75 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/011 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,976.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 -43,976.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 01-Mar-2000 44,024-60 PDC 48.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,984.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 43,98450 3133TCE95 VARRT081152032 01-Mar-2000 -44,032.60 PD -48.I0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,984.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 43,994-50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Apr-2000 40,315.65 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Apr-2000 40,258.% PD 56.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Apr-2000 40,315.65 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,577.00 FRLMC MULTICLASS CFF 2146 QT 01-Apr-2000 34,577.00 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Apr-2000 -33,966.50 PD 610.50 09-Map2000 8:53:59 Executive Wvwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,577.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Apr-2000 34,577.00 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/15/2011 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Apr-2000 38,567.02 3128DDQ55 7,000%02/01/2003 DO 02/011 01-Apr-2000 -39,169.63 PD -602.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP SG5-0476 01-Apr-2000 38,567.02 3128DDQ55 7.0005602/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2000 46,069.54 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/01/9 01-Apr-2000 47,077.31 PD -1,007.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2000 46,069.54 36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/0119 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4,489.10 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-Apr-2000 4,489.10 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2000 4,379.68 PD 109.42 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 48,755.45 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Apr-2000 48,755.45 36225CAZ9 7.125%17J20/2026 DO 12101/ 01-Apr-2000 49,562.96 PI) -807.51 09-May-2000 8.53:59 Ex .aw Wo kbomh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocscoo0/oo9a 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIVAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SEITL DATFI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4$755.45 GNMA II POOL 40080023 01-Apr-2000 48.755.45 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/011 01-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,076.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Apr.2000 34,076.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 01-Apr-2000 -34,113.27 PD -37.27 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,845.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 995 01-Apr-2000 1.845.10 39810#AE4 7.430°h06/012003 DO 022910 01-Apr.2000 .1,818.14 PD 26.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,945.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP F14A#95 01-Apr-2000 1,845.10 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 01.Apr-2000 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .566.63 WMP/HUNIOON PAIGE#000.11150 01-Apr-2000 566.63 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Apt-2000 -554.32 PD 12.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -566.63 WMPIHUNTOON PAIGE 9000-11150 01-Apr-2000 566.63 302998GE3 7.500%1 2/012 0 3 0 DO 102119 01-Apr.2000 0.00 FC 27-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Apr-2000 24,064.04 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 082619 15-Apr-2000 .24,064.04 PD 0.00 09-May-2000 8.'53:59 &ec m Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Apr-2000 24,064.04 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 08/26/9 15-Apr.2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK.AUTO TR 96A C 15-Apr-2000 7,786.30 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1519 15-Apr-2000 .7,786.30 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Apr-2000 7.796.30 31677EAA4 6-200%09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .51,068.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2000 51,068.50 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2000 .51,069.50 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,068.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Apo-2000 51,068.50 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -192,690.06 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN 98-2 AI 25-Apr-2000 182,690.06 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 25-Apr.2000 ,192,297.56 PD 392.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -192,690.06 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 AI 25-Apr-2000 182,690.06 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 25-Apr-2000 0.00 FC 25-Apr•2000 0.00 MATURITIES 09-May-2000 8:53:59 &ecutim WorkbewA, Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: i5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITYH/ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,800,000.00 CBA(DELAWAR)DISC 03-Apr-200D 2,769,970.00 1247SID37 04/03/2000 03-Apr-2000 -2,769,970.00 MT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO A300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Apr-2000 8,222,307.39 36959HD79 04/072000 07-Apr-200D -8,222,307.39 MT 07-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 892,343.00 2338EODA1 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 -892,343.00 MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 694,776.44 233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 ,694,776.44 MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 10-Apr-20D0 4,256,973.72 44922ADA5 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 4,256,973.72 MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 12-Apr-2000 891,546.50 98412CDC0 04/122000 12-Apr-2000 -891,546.50 MT 12-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 13,861,699.45 98412CDH9 04/172000 17-Apr-2000 -13,861,699.45 MT 17-Apo2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wwkbertrh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I9-Apr-2000 497,223.33 3133%VT7 MAT04/18/2000 18-Apr-2000 497,223.33 MT IS-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Apr-2000 1,890,411.32 313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 20-Apr-2000 -1,880,411.52 MT 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 3,172,160.00 313384VZ9 MAT 04/242000 24-Apr-2000 -3,172,160.00 MT 24-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 3,199,499.78 313384WA3 MAT 04252000 25-Apr-2000 -3,199,499.79 MT 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 1,299,261.00 313396WA7 MAT 04252000 INCOME AT MAT 25-Apr-2000 -1,288,261.00 MT 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 1,799,714.00 313384WBI MAT 0426/2000 26-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00 MT 26-Apr-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Apr-2000 6,000,000.00 63858IDE6 5.850%04/07/2000 DD 04/07/9 07-Apr-2000 -5,996,400.00 MT 07-Apr-2000 3,600.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATF/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 29-De 1999 -32,046.25 42332SBK8 FLTG RT 0&7517001 DO 0625/ 25-Dec-l"9 0.00 TIC 29-De 1999 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 15-Mar-2000 -61,930.56 06605TAL6 6.125%03/15/2002 DD 03/12/9 15-Ma 2000 0.00 ITC I5-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 15-MW-2000 61,250.00 06605TAL6 6.125%03/IS/2002 DO 0311219 15-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 MORGAN I P&CO MTN SR 00043 03-Apr-2000 4,593.75 61687YBU0 6.125%10/02/2000 DD 10102/9 02-Apr2000 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Apr-2000 1.09 996087094 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 03-Apr-2000 79,697.50 59018SXP4 6.375%10101/2001 DO 1010319 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Map-1000 8.53:59 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 03-Apr-2000 39,696.56 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DO 03/29/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 CBA(DELAWAR)DISC 03-Apr-2000 30,030.00 12478JD37 04/03/2000 03-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 247.13 996095247 01-Apr-2000 0.00 1T 04-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 2,838.07 996085247 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 04-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Apr-2000 175,500.00 638581DE6 5.850Y 0 4/0 720 0 0 DO 04/0719 07-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 07-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Apr-2000 77,692.61 36959HD79 04/07/2000 07-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 07-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00538 10-Apr-2000 31,590.00 345402YKI 7.0200/.10/10/2000 DO 10/10/9 10-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Map2000 8:53:59 Ereculive Workbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 7,657.00 233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 5,223.56 233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 10-Apr-2000 43,026.28 44922ADAS 04/10/2000 10-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 12-Apr-2000 8,453.50 98412CDCO 04/122000 12-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 12-Apr-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 13-Apr-2000 29,843.96 423328BK8 FLTG RT 06/252001 DO 06/25/ 25-Dec-1999 0.00 IT 13-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 13-Apr-2000 8.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Mer-2000 0.00 IT 13-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 475,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 17-Apr-2000 15,140.63 318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DD 10111/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wwkbemh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLMATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-Apr-2000 747,500.00 912827ZE2 06.500%10/15/2006DD 10/15/ 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 17-Apr-2000 67,500.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN WTR 00299 17-Apr-2000 61,900.00 61745ENLI FLTG FIT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP kG5-0476 17-Apr-2000 50,643.79 3128DDQ55 7.0000/h 02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 138,300.55 98412CDH9 04/172000 17-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,577.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 17-Apr-2000 12,390.69 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Apr2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 17-Apr-2000 2,270.75 3133T02D5 5.900%06/1512017 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May 2000 8:53:59 Exemim T kbewc , Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,748.75 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 17-Apr-2000 1,802.33 31348SWZ3 6.3840/o01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,994.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CPF E3 A 17-Apr-2000 15,793.54 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 17-Apr-2000 1.979.13 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 08/26/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 17-Apr-2000 232.60 31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03115/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,069.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 17-Apr-2000 14,952.70 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16t203O 16-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB IS-Apr-2000 5,060.10 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/192000 DD 051181 18-Apr-2000 0.00 IT I8-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 1 B-Apr-2000 2,776.67 3133%VT7 MAT 04/182000 1B-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 18-Apr-2000 0.00 09-Mak2000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 19-Apr-2000 12,052.43 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 19-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 20-Apr-2000 11,666,67 3837H3C70 7.000%12/20/2022 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Apr-2000 19,589.48 313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 20-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 0090088M 20-Apr-2000 10,503.47 36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 DO 0610119 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2000 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,755.45 GNMA H POOL#0080023 20-Apr-2000 8,811.13 36225CAZ9 7.125%1220/2026 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN STRO06 20-Apr-2000 20,905.82 17120QEBO FLTG RT 08/082002 DO 04/08/ 20-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 27,840.00 313384VZ9 MAT 04/24/2000 24-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 24-Apr-2000 0.00 09-M,0,2000 8:53:59 Erec.11w Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDAM SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Apr-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPVZ 6.500°/h09252018 25-Mar-2000 0.00 1T 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 510.22 313384WA3 MAT04/25/2000 25-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 11,739.00 313396WA7 MAT 04/25P2000 INCOME AT MAT 25.Apr-2000 0.00 IT 25-Apr2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,845.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 25-Apr-2000 8,170.75 39810®AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 25-Apn2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 182,690.06 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 At 25-Apr-2000 46,039.59 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 061181 25-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 286.00 313394WBI MAT 0426/2000 26-Apo-2000 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 566.63 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 27-Apr-2000 6,098.47 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 27-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-2000 8.'53:59 &ec.&i Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG000I0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 5,820.00 9128275W8 4.250%001/15/2010 DO 011151 0.00 CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 28-Apr-2000 -19.04 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 28-Apr-2000 0.00 C W 28-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN#TR 00246 28-Apr.2000 47,775.00 42333HLF7 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DO 041271 28-Apr-2000 0.00 IT 28-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN#TR 00311 28-Apr.2000 26,783.50 61745ENY3 FLTG RT 01/28/2002 DO 11127/ 2&Apr-2000 0.00 IT 28-Apr.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 28-Apr.2000 7,283.30 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 0.00 CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 131,240.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 50,102.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 0.00 CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00 09-May-1000 8:53:59 &x cwr WmkbencF, FAHR COMMITTEE Meetlng Da a T. Id, 05/10/m OS/24100 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Ite.Wu ber FAHR00-36 1Hrn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2000 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2000. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) X Yxp.tlM1WpeMa�aE ApeMa 0.aytlaW]IBwN Apentla Pepah'A:A.11eT 15�t�.pcc a�ve., i�ee Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are four comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of December 31, 1999 and March 31, 2000. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through March 31, 2000. Portfolio Pa ormance summary Quarter Ended March 31,2000 Liquid Operating Monies Long-Term Operating Monies(%) (%) Trial as Total Rate of of Return Benchmark"' Return Benchmark', 3 Months is 1.4 1.6 1. 6 Months 2.0 2.6 2.3 1.7 9 Months 4.3 3.8 3. .a 12 Monhs 5.5 5.0 3.5 3.1 since Inception 30 Sept.95 5.5 5.1 6.1 5.a Market Value per PIMCO 31 Mar.00 919.91A $351.6M Average Qualay 'AA. 'AAA' Current Yield(%) 6.2 8.2 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) a 0.9 Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) 3.5M Estimated Annual Income $1.1M 321.111M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt 1-5 Year Bond Index Market Recap Interest rates diverged at both the short and long ends of the Treasury yield curve, as the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates twice during the quarter to prevent the economy from overheating. At their February 2 meeting, the Federal Reserve raised the fed funds rate by 25 basis points, from 5.50%to 5.75%. The Fed announced another 25 basis point increase to 6.00% at their March 21 meeting, and suggested future rate hikes because "...increases in demand will continue to exceed the growth in potential HM dasIsnili/.good•p•pracK00 eyy A,-.Rapeasevol 15,so R•'Yii : 1AV95 Page 2 J' supply, which could foster inflationary imbalances that would undermine the record economic expansion." Short-term interest rates rose as much as 57 basis points for the 3-month Treasury Bill (from 5.30% to 5.87%), fueled largely by the belief of investors that the Fed would again raise interest rates. On the other hand, long-term rates fell as investors grew concerned that the Federal government's debt buyback program would create a scarcity of long-dated Treasuries. As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the Historical Yield Curve, the yield on the 30-year Treasury benchmark fell 64 basis points, closing the first quarter at 5.84% when compared to the end of the fourth quarter 1999 at 6.47%. Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds ended the quarter at 6.00%, a decline of 40 basis points from the end of the fourth quarter(6.40%). For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a slightly below index weighted maturity or duration (2.2 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing holdings in mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporate notes, and real return bonds. The performance of the portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 36 basis points for the first quarter 2000 (1.63% vs. 1.27%). For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO continued to use an "at index' duration (approximately 73 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing investment grade corporate securities and high-quality commercial paper. This added returns to the portfolio, which outperformed its benchmark by 35 basis points for the first quarter (1.54% vs. 1.19%). Market Outlook Forecasts from PIMCO report that U.S. economic expansion will slow as higher interest rates curb growth in the housing market and investment spending. PIMCO expects the Fed to tighten the federal funds rate with at least two more 25 basis point rate hikes this year amid concern that rapid growth could outstrip the economy's capacity and fuel inflation. The PIMCO investment strategy targets portfolio duration near the benchmarks to take advantage of higher yields provided by longer maturity securities, while limiting overall interest rate risk. PIMCO indicates that they will continue to hold short maturity corporate and U.S. government agency debt issues; concentrate on high quality commercial paper for liquidity; and emphasize asset-backed securities and mortgages, especially GNMA's which are backed by the"full faith and credit" of the U.S. government, to capture higher relative yields. The attached letter from PIMCO provides a more detailed description of first- quarter market conditions, portfolio returns, future market outlook, and their recommended investment strategy for the District's Liquid and Long-Term Operating Monies portfolios. Ht ftmg d"1 WAVe Ra Wooe M 'skit a"c neae.d.1e Page 3 Portfolio Market Values On February 24, 2000, the District received approximately $63.5 million from the Orange County Investment Pool bankruptcy settlement distributions. With settlement of the Orange County bankruptcy claims, the District has recovered 94% of the amount the District had on deposit with the Orange County Investment Pool at the time of the County's bankruptcy. The funds were deposited in the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Term Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies(fM) Monies(fM) 31 March 99 18.8 305.8 30 Jm1e 99 19.0 305.g 30 Sept.99 19.3 271.1 31 Dee.09 19.8 282.8 31 Mamh W 19.9 351.fi ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Four Comparative Bar Charts 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph 6. PIMCO Letter dated April 27. 2000 SVK:Ic NM A�RA,en*00008-N RB^^4a R.eonz WMem 15,'EI.Oz Rezea. 15 Page 4 e Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:31 PM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 90 80 ,^ 70 60 ❑ 12/31/99 c 50 ® 3/31/00 N 40 4039 3 °" 30 20 11 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dtaVint22201geggitFinancetPortfolio long term graph Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:36 PM OCSD Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 70 60 52 ❑ 12/31 /99 CD 50I— - 43 ® 3/31/00 a`) 40d 3024 20 21 20 10 3 3 0 A11P1 AAA AA A G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio short term E.� 4 Prepared by Finance, 05101/2000, 1:37 PM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Credit Quality 100 90 80 70 60 ❑ 12/31/99 50 la3/31/00 2, 40 a 30 20 19 23 20 17 10 0 AU] I E-1= A1/P1 AAA AA A G1excel.dta\lnt2220tgegg[TinanceXPortfollo long term graph Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:12 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 7.00 6.75 6.50 6.25 6.00 ; 5.75 c w 5.50 i 5.25 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.26 4.00 E E 5 >` 5 a` 5 5 S 5 `a, . P! N M V N n O N M - 30-Sep-99 -6 31-1)ea99 f31-Mar-00 G:\excel.dta\On12220\geggi\Finance\HlstodcalTREASURYyleldcuive P I M C O PACIFIC INV65TNeNi MANAGEMENT COMYANT a40New;,MCenter Drive SWte 300 NewpER Beech,CA 92660 Tel: 949.720.6000 April 27, 2000 F.:949.720.1376 Mr. Steve Kozak Finance Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: 1st Quarter 2000 Report Dear Steve: What follows is a description of events in the bond markets during the 1st Quarter 2000 and an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. I have also included a section on strategies to be pursued in your portfolio during the coming months. Bond Market Recaa: U.S. Yield Curve Inverts Amid Government Debt Buyback The short and long ends of the Treasury market diverged during the first quarter. Short-term Treasury yields rose as much as 57 basis points in anticipation of more tightening by the Federal Reserve. The 30-year yield fell 64 basis points, closing the quarter at 5.84 percent, as investors grew concerned that the government's debt buyback would create a scarcity of long- term Treasuries. Yields on mortgages and corporate bonds did not fall in line with Treasuries, which caused yield premiums on non-Treasury bonds to widen. The market correctly anticipated the Fed's intentions, as the central bank raised the federal funds' rate twice in 25 basis point increments during the quarter. The Fed suggested that more rate hikes are in the offering because "increases in demand will continue to exceed the growth in potential supply, which could foster inflationary imbalances that would undermine the record economic expansion." Those imbalances include the record U.S. trade deficit, high corporate and individual debt levels and tight labor markets. Strong equity and housing markets also represent a potential threat because they create a wealth effect that fuels consumer demand. Still, actual inflation remained relatively subdued during the quarter. While effects of increased energy prices showed up in higher headline consumer price inflation, the core rate outside of energy and food costs was little changed. v Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Two ECB Tightens to Check Inflation; Japan Remains Sluggish The European Central Bank also tightened twice in the first quarter. Faster economic growth in the 11-nation euro zone pushed inflation above the ECB's two percent limit in several countries, prompting the rate hikes. ECB tightening was also designed to bolster the euro, which weakened in recent months amid capital outflows to the U.S. Japan moved in the opposite direction from Europe and the U.S. The government announced a 1.4 percent contraction in fourth quarter GDP, the second consecutive quarterly decline, as consumer confidence remained weak despite substantial fiscal stimulus. Yield Curve Shift, Credit Concerns Benefit Treasuries Treasuries generally outperformed during the first quarter. Falling 10- and 30-year Treasury yields and concern about credit deterioration in the midst of Fed tightening lured investors away from other bond market sectors. The following summarizes relative sector performance: • Mortgages lagged Treasuries as higher interest rate volatility and concern about government agency credit quality caused yield premiums to widen. • Corporate bonds fared even worse than mortgages, especially the non-investment grade sector. Supply pressures were a negative early in the quarter, coupled with concern about rising corporate debt levels associated with share repurchases and heightened LBO activity. • By contrast, emerging market bonds, led by lower-quality credits in Russia and Ecuador, continued to outperform Treasuries. Stronger global growth and higher commodity prices also supported upper-tier credits such as Mexico, whose credit rating was raised to investment grade. • Currency-hedged European and Japanese bonds also underperformed, unable to keep pace with the Treasury rally despite lower levels of economic growth than the U.S. Performance Attribution: Long Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 1.63 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 36 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Our below-index duration positively impacted returns as short-term interest rates rose. • A broader-than-index maturity structure was modestly positive as short maturity rates rose most. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Three Performance Attribution: (Continued) • A mortgage emphasis added to returns slightly as our concentration in GNMA's benefited from investor demand for government guaranteed securities. • Investment-grade corporates were neutral as relatively high yields offset the 'impact of widening credit spreads. • Asset-backed securities helped returns because yield premiums continued to narrow as issuance declined. • Real return bonds outperformed like-duration Treasuries, adding to performance, as real yields fell. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 1.54 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill Index by 35 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Our index-like portfolio duration was neutral. • Investment-grade corporates added to returns as higher yields more than offset the impact of widening spreads. • High quality commercial paper added to returns due to their yield advantage over Treasuries. Economic Outlook: U.S. and European Economic Growth To Converge U.S. expansion will decelerate as higher interest rates curb growth in the housing market and investment spending. European growth will pick up and approach that of the U.S. due to a relatively accommodative monetary policy and a weak euro. Japan's economy will remain weak as a highly stimulative fiscal policy shows few signs of sparking sustainable growth. The following points elaborate our outlook: • U.S. mortgage rates well above 8 percent will discourage new home sales and slow consumer spending through reductions in durable goods' purchases that typically accompany home purchases. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY d Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Four Economic Outlook: (Continued) • U.S. investment spending growth has already started to turn down as a percentage of total GDP growth and will continue to moderate as higher rates raise the cost of capital investment. • Monetary policy in the U.S. will be restrictive, with at least two more 25 basis point rate hikes this year, amid concern that rapid growth could outstrip the economy's capacity and fuel inflation. • Interest rates in the U.S. will remain relatively stable, with some upward pressure given the direction of Fed policy. • In Europe, consumer confidence should continue to rise and enhance growth prospects now that average unemployment has fallen into single digits and is nearing a seven-year low. • Japan's growing debt burden and deteriorating credit fundamentals threaten to push interest rates higher and limit any resurgence in the economy. European Inflation Will Continue to Lag That of U.S. U.S. inflation will remain above last year's relatively low levels following recent increases in commodity and import prices, but will moderate later this year after the impact of higher oil prices has been realized. European inflation will increase but remain below that of the U.S. because Europe's expansion is at an earlier stage and its unused capacity is greater, especially in the labor market. Financial Imbalances Make Portfolio Quality Critical Japan is not the only country where mounting debt poses risks. The U.S. is also vulnerable to higher interest rates and/or declining asset prices because of financial imbalances. Non-U.S. investors may eventually require higher rates to finance the record U.S. current account deficit. Current high levels of consumer and corporate debt will be hard to sustain if the assets backing the debt (stocks, for example) fall in value. Avoiding adverse price performance arising from credit deterioration will be critical for earning superior returns in this environment. Longer maturity Treasuries, which will benefit from U.S. budget surpluses and debt buybacks, are one alternative. Mortgages are another because they offer attractive yields relative to Treasuries with little or no credit risk. GNMA mortgages, for example, are backed by the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. government. Corporate and emerging market bonds are most vulnerable to declines in credit quality, though their attractive yields may compensate for PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY i Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Five Avoiding adverse price performance arising from credit deterioration will be critical for earning superior returns in this environment. (Continued) the added risk. Among developed non-U.S. markets, European and Japanese government bonds are likely to lag Treasuries as European growth converges with the U.S. and concerns about Japan's credit standing increase. Strateev: The following lists highlight the strategies that will be used in the Long Term portfolio in the coming months: • While continuing to emphasize yield, position portfolios for an overall "flight to quality" in the bond market. • Target duration near the benchmark to take advantage of higher yields on longer- maturity securities without increasing interest rate risk. • Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the yield curve. • Emphasize mortgages to earn attractive yields, especially GNMA's, which should benefit from investors' search for "full faith and credit" government securities. • Concentrate investment-grade corporate holdings on shorter-maturity bonds that are less vulnerable to widening yield premiums. • Continue to favor adjustable-rate mortgages as higher yielding, short-term holdings. • Hold high quality asset-backed securities with a focus on home equity and other higher yielding market segments. The following lists highlights the strategies that will be used in the Liquid portfolio in the coming months: • Target duration near the index to capture yield while limiting overall interest rate sensitivity. • Continue to hold select short-duration corporate issues to take advantage of high yields given minimal added risk. • Emphasize high quality commercial paper and shorter-terns agency debt issues due to strong liquidity, attractive yields and limited credit risk. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000 Orange County Sanitation District Page Six Steve, we hope this information proves useful. We look forward to discussing these and other issues with you in the near future. Sincerely, '^ I 'L' R. Doti Rita J. Seymour Joseph A. Fournier Vice President Account Manager RJS/JAF:ci PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY FAIiRCOMMITTEE MeebRgDere To6,oror. s(1o/o0 5Ra/ao AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Bean Number FAHROO-37 15(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report prepared by staff for the period ended March 31, 2000. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending March 31, 2000. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended March 31, 2000. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District through the third quarter of the 1999-00 fiscal year. Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1999-00 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 74.57 percent, or $32,810,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been expended. Net costs have increased 3.50 percent in comparison with the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2000 is $495.41 based on flows of 66.2 billion gallons, or 243 million gallons per day. This is $13.17, or 2.73 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due to the shortfall in flows which are 3.7 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. Capital improvement outlays through March 31 were 45.12 percent of budget, or $41,691,800. X:txp.pYLynnY3mN Agenda ReppM*=0epeld Agenda Rerdaft TBem 1510dee Renee: 1W Page 1 Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $141.37 million, or 75.42 percent of budget through March 31. Costs related to capital improvement projects are only at $41.69 million, or 45.12 percent of budget. This capital outlay shortage is offset by the excess costs incurred in Revenue Area Operating and Other Expenses totaling $29.4 million, or 314.0 percent of the $9.4 million budget. Of this total amount, $22,782,400 was a write-off of investments previously held in the Orange County Investment Pool. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ATTACHMENTS District's Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended March 31. 2000. H kAp Agenda Re,gdnaQ 0&unC Agenda RepoaeVI neon lstel dde R-. 1� Page 2 Y FAHRCOMMITTEE MeedngDrt ToXads. 5/10/00 5/24/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem NumE Faraoo-sa lstn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. SUMMARY The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ , This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) M\ry.MeYDeMaeb.re nv.^e. 9 ,d Ay.^tla Rapa4VAWJlem tsln da Page 1 T ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy Number From To Reason And Subject For Change clo.o0—classlfo.tions.Position, Current'Map'Language Pay for Performance Charges per the OCEA Salary Ranges and wages and pay ranges. language&pay ranges for negotiations and updates OCEA.Removal of needed to clarify the policy. probationary Increases For OCEA.clarification on timing of reclassirrtatiaru. Clarify'pronUon'of meant increases. CM.00—Compensation Current'Mep language Pay for Performance Changes per the OCEA and pay ranges, language 8 pay ranges for negotiations and updates OCEA.Removal of needed to clarify the policy. probationary fricassee for OCEA.Clarification on timing of reclassifications. Clarity'proration'of merit increases. C30.00-Appraisal of Performance Cunenl'step'language Pay for Performance Changesperthe OCEA and pay ranges. language&pay ranges For negotiations. OCEA. D90.OD-Tullion Reimbursement Current language. Define eligible employees. Clarity policy and increase Program Streamline reimbursement accountability of staff. process.Make employee more accountable for subrntting request for reimbursement. Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the changes outlined above and is attached for review and acceptance. Exhibit A can be found in Attachment 1. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Policy C10.00 Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages 2. Policy C20.00 Compensation 3. Policy C30.00 Appraisal of Performance 4. Policy D90.00 Tuition Reimbursement Program XYgeY\pme�akoN 1petla aeWmlMOP dAWMa aepwaYxMaM�15a).e% Page 2 g V RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-09 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES M�MM��f1f�111Y1�1� The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.00, Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C20.00, Compensation, set forth in Attachment No. 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C30.00, Appraisal of Performance, set forth in Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. D90.00, Tuition Reimbursement Program, set forth in Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H:\wp.dlaWminkB5V m0U10ns=000009.dw ATTACHMENT 1 V, Orange County Policy Number: C10.00 s 0 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 Subject: CLASSIFICATIONS, Supersedes: November 17, 1999 POSITIONS, SALARY RANGES AND WAGES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's compensation programs. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Classifications are groups of positions, regardless of location,which are alike enough in duties and responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title,to be given the same pay scale under similar conditions, and to require substantially the same qualifications. Salary Ranges are the range of pay rates,from minimum to maximum, set for a pay grade or class. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows employees to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and personal merit. Every position is assigned to a salary grade based upon the duties and responsibilities of that position and the comparative market value of that job function. Comparisons are most generally made with organizations of similar size and engaged in similar occupational pursuits within the geographic area of potential recruitment. The basic salary ranges are set forth on Exhibit A. 4.2 Non-management employees are awarded merit increases based upon their performance, as determined by the performance evaluation program, and the position of their salary within the pay range. The Merit Matrix is the tool used to determine the actual amount of merit increase. In addition,employees ia4pe who at least meet expectations receive annual Cost of Living Adjustments(COLA)to keep employees'salaries at market. The amount of the COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI, All-Urban Consumers-LA, Riverside, Orange County)for the month of May and is distributed as a base-building increase. 4.3 Employees in the Executive Management and Management Groups are awarded merit increases based upon their performance, as determined by the Page 1 performance evaluation program and the position of their salary relative to the external market. External market rates are determined through the use of salary surveys. The merit increase may be distributed as base building or non-base building. 4.4 The General Manager is authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy budgeted positions and to exercise supervision over all persons in accordance with the provisions of this policy and to terminate, for cause, the employment of any regular full time employee employed under these provisions. All other employees, e.g., probationary, part-time, and limited termftemporary and contract may be terminated at the District's sole discretion. 4.5 The General Manager is also authorized to employ Executive Management employees on an"at-will" basis. Such status shall be memorialized by a written agreement signed by the General Manager and the Executive Manager, acknowledging that the Executive Manager shall serve at the pleasure of the General Manager. Any Executive Management employee so employed on the date of adoption of this policy,who has not signed an"at-will"agreement may voluntarily elect to do so, but may not be required to do so. 4.6 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this policy or any prior Board action, the General Manager is authorized to periodically adjust the rate of compensation of Executive Management employees who have signed"at-will"agreements so long as no adjustment exceeds the compensation permitted by the applicable salary range established by the Joint Boards of Directors. 4.7 Employees who believe their position is not properly classified may request a classification study of their positron through their Department Head. Classification studies shall only be conducted during the budget planning process in accordance with a schedule that is announced annually by the General Manager. Reclassifications approved in the budget may be made effective any time during the new fiscal year. Classification studies may also'be considered one other time during the year in November. Classification study requests must be submitted to Human Resources no later than October 1 P for the November cycle. �u 3010.iec lde-May-ryGe. 4.7.2 All classification study findings regarding existing classifications are subject to approval by the General Manager;findings recommending new job classification titles are subject to approval by the District's Boards of Directors. 4.8 The District shall provide an investment incentive salary to the employees within the classifications and in the amounts,as set forth in Section 4.8.1, which amounts are based on a percentage of salary equal to the amount previously paid to designated employees pursuant to District Policy No.C150.00, Section 7.1, effective October 22, 1997,and repealed April 22, 1998. 4.8.1 The percentage of base salary amounts are as follows: Executive management—6%(up to a maximum IRS amount) Division management and supervisor—4% Professional and confidential—3% Page 2 v 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Executive Management, Management,Supervisory, Professional and OCEA Group Employees 5.1.1 New Employees. Employees 1axempt=-c2laFy ;aages shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range unless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings result In a requirement for a salary greater than the minimum. The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised, if any. 5.1.1.1 Employees' serve Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period. Employees who successfully conclude their probation are eligible for a salary adjustment the subsequent July in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program established by separate action of the Boards of Directors as amended from time to time. 5.1.2 Annual Management Performance Review Program. An annual performance review is completed for all employees ire=exempt-range alassiGsatierre in accordance with the provisions of the performance evaluation Program. Performance based salary adjustments occur on the first day of the first pay period in July, and may be prorated based upon the date of hire,or promotion,aclacRirwreaae In those instances where the individual has not concluded probation as of July 1, 5.1.3 Promotional Increases. Employees in"exempt" range classifications who earn promotions to a new"exempt" range classification will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings, and in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised. The new salary will normally represent an increase of at least 5.5 percent. Employees A "exempt" e alaesifisate"are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of the Promotional Probationary Period. If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary adjustment is deferred unfil such time as probation is successfully concluded. 5.2 Local 501 Employees on the Five-Step Pay Plan 5.2.1 New Employees. Employees who successfully complete their Initial Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%)effective on the first day of the pay period following completion of the Initial Probationary Period. The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is established on the first day of a pay period following 25 weeks of continuous service and satisfactory complefion of probation. Page 3 5.2.2 Annual Merit Increase. Employees who are not at the top of the salary range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step(5.5%)on their Salary Review date, provided their performance fully meets expectations. 5.2.3 Promotional Increase. Employees who earn a promotion are entilled to a promotional increase of 5.5%, or to the base of the new range, whichever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an employee has not successfully completed their Promotional Probationary Period on their Salary Review date,any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed unfit such time as the probationary period is completed. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6A Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 do not apply to At-will Executive Management Employees. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Exhibit A 8.2 Fair Labor Standards Act Page 4 Y m,m Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Administrative and Clerical Exhibit A Pry Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status NEB 44,809 58,182 Information Services Technician III Non-Exempt NE7 42,301 55,195 Financial Technician Non-Exempt NE7 42,301 55,195 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Senior Stomskeeper Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Information Services Technician II Non-Exempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Information Services Technician l Non-Exempl NE4 33,800 4 ,027 Secretary Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Accounting Clark Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Office Aide Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Storeskeeper Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,750 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,750 Office Ape Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,750 Once Specialist Non-Exempt NEi 23,250 30,164 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt NE7 23,250 30,164 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt vaee Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Engineering Pey Range Minimum Maximum ClassiReaBom FLEA SfaWe NE9 49,001 63,611 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt NE9 49.001 63,611 Engineering Associate Non-Exempt NEB 44,809 58,182 Constmction Inspector Non-Exempt NE7 42,301 55,195 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt NE5 36,200 47,066 Engineering Aide 11 Non-Exempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Engineering Aide I Non-Exempt V serxo Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Technical Services P+Y Range Minimun WWnun Classifications JFLSA Status NE8 aa,809 58.182 Ei irunmental Specialist ll Nor-Exempt NEB aa,809 58,182 Source Conirel Inspector ll Non-Exempt NE8 aa,809 58.182 Senior laboratory Analyst NomExempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Environmental Specialist l Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50J55 Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Source Control Inspector I Non-Exempt NEa 33,8D0 ",027 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt a Orange County Sanitation Cisbiet Classifications By Employee Group Confidential Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA SbWe NE7 42,301 55,195 Executive Assistant It Non-Exempt NEB 38,501 M,m Atlminisuative Assistant Nan-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Principal Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,750 O6ioe specialist Non-Exempt V n" Orange County Sanitation District Classl0cations By Employee Group Operations and Maintenance S01) Pay Range Minimum Maximum Clasai0cations FLEA Stetrn 2015 47,285 58.883 Lead Electrical Technician Non-Exempt 2015 47.265 58.863 Lead lnslmme talion Technician Non-Exempt 2015_ 47,285 58.883 Lego Pump Pointer Operator NorvEzempt 2014 44,778 55,748 ElecWeal Technician II No Exempt 2014 44,TB 55,748 Instrumentation Technician ll Non-Exempt 2013 43.258 53,868 Lead Mechanic Non-Exempt 2013 43.258 53.868 Pump Power Operatof Non-Exempt 2013 43.258 53,888 Ledo Plant Operator Non-Exempt a= 40d48 50.898 c-P9, -OF-- Non,Ewmpt 2012 41.812 52.060 Lead Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt 2012 41.812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt 2012 41,812 52,060 Machinist NortExempt 2011 39,304 48.949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt 2011 39,304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt 2010 39.040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt 2009 37.W9 47.285 Builder Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47.285 Elacm.1 Technician l Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47,285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt 2008 37.737 46,973 Plant Operator No Exempt 2007 34.505 42.969 Eleancal Maintenance Worker NonExempt 2007 34.505 42.969 Insbumentalion Maintenance Worker Non-Exempl 20W 34.505 42.969 Painter Non-Exempt 2007 34.505 42,969 Senior Maintenance Worker NonExempt 2007 34.505 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt 2006 33.590 41,812 Mechanic No Exempt 2005 31,348 39.040 Colledbn Facilities Worker II Non-Exempt 2005 31,348 39,040 Maintenance Worker NonExempt 2004 30,938 38.509 Operator In Training Non-Exempt 2003 29,876 37,207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt 2002 29.490 30.700 Control Center Clark Non-Exempt 2001 24.184 30,093 Collection Facilities Worker l Non-Exempt 2000 22.882 21l Helper Non-Exempt 9 Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Professional R4R9e Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Sbtw E14 $70.380 $99,600 Chief Scientist Exempt E13 $67,128 $94.932 Assistant to the General Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Senior Engineer Exempt E12 $63.948 $90,468 Senior Scientist Exempt E12 $63.948 $90,468 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt Ell 560,828 SB6.064 Engineer Exempt Ell $60.828 $86.064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt E70 $57.852 $81.948 Seaetary to the Board of Directors Exempt E9 $55,212 $78.156 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt E9 555,212 $78,156 Project Specialist Exempt E9 555,212 $78,156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt E9 $0.212 $78,158 Saenlist Exempt E9 565.212 $78.156 Principal Accountant Exempt E9 555,212 $78.156 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt E9 555.212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt Elf 552.500 $74.292 Associate Engineer 111 Exempt ES $52,501) $74.292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt EB $52.500 $74,292 Safety 8 Emergency Response Spedalist Exempt E7 $50.054 $70.848 Programmer Analyst Exempt E7 550.064 $70.848 Computer Hardware Specialist Exempt E7 550.084 $70.848 Telecommunications Specialist Exempt E7 $50.064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt E7 $50.054 570,848 Contracts Administrator Exempt ES $47,640 $07.392 Principal Laboratory B Research Analyst Exempt ES $47.640 $67.392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt E5 $45,395 $64.212 Associate Engineer 11 Exempt ES $45.396 $64.212 Senior Accountant Exempt E5 $45.396 564,212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt ES $45,395 $64,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt E5 $45,396 $64.212 Senior Emironmenbl Specialist Exempt E4 $43.248 $61,236 Safety Representative Exempt E4 543,248 $61.236 Programmer Exempt E4 $43.248 $61,236 Senior Buyer Exempt E3 541,136 $58.260 Associate Engineer I Exempt E2 $39.252 $55,488 Contracts Specialist Exempt E1 $37.294 $52,908 Accountant Exempt E1 $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt E1 $37.284 $52.908 Financial Analyst Exempt E1 $37,284 $52.908 Management Analyst Exempt Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Supervisory Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Status E14 $70,380 $99,600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt E12 $63.948 $90,466 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,06l Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Contracts 8 Purchasing Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Accounting Supeivisor Exempt Eli $60,828 $86.064 Human Resources Supervisor Exempt E9 $55,212 $78.156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt E9 $55,212 $78,156 Operations Supervisor Exempt E9 $55.212 578,156 Source Control Supervisor Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt 4ZW0 g Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Management Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Stall E16 677,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt E16 $771688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt E16 $77,668 $109,812 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Manager Exempt E16 $77.688 $109.812 Laboratory Manager Exempt US $77.688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt E15 $73.956 $104.616 Controller Exempt E15 $73,956 $104,616 Financial Manager Exempt E75 573,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt E75 $73.956 $104.616 Contracts&Purchasing Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt E13 $57,128 594.932 Safety/Emergency Response Manager Exempt E13 $57,128 $94.932 Maintenance Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Human Resources Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Operators Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technology Manager Exempt v Orange County Sanitation District Clasal9callons By Employee Group Executive Management Pay Rang. Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status E27 $154,596 $164.596 General Manager Exempt E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Engineerirg Exempt E19 $67,160 $139.980 Director of Operations&Maintenance Exempt E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Technical Services Exempt E78 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt E18 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Information Technology Exempt E17 $75.876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt E13 $67.128 $94.932 Director of Communications Exempt m.mo 9 Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group "Non•ReoutaP Part Time Pey Range Mlnlmum Maximum Claeslfieatlona FLSA Statue NEO 9.000 16.000 Intern Non-Exempt Attachment 2 v Orange County Policy Number: C20.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 Subject: COMPENSATION Supersedes: November 17, 1999 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish and maintain uniform compensation standards for all District employees. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District employees, as specified herein. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the policy of the District to apply uniform compensation standards. The District Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows District management to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and personal merit. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Exempt Employees 5.1.1 Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed. 5.2 Non-exempt Employees 5.2.1 Non-exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed. 5.3 Y�•• @€.ii:iage-C�aesifisatieac Page 1 of 5 9 5.3.1 e _ o.e'reS 5.3.1.1 An employee shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range unless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings indicates a need for a salary greater than the minimum. 5.341.1.1 The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider the relationship of the employee's proposed salary to that of other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised, if any. 5.3.2 Probation 5.3.2.1 Except for"at-will" Executive Management employees, employees ' serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period unless otherwise provided in an individual, written employment agreement. 5.342.1.1 An employee who successfully completes probation is eligible for a salary adjustment according to the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program which is in force at the time of the review. 5.3.3 Reviews 5.3.3.1 An annual performance review is completed for all according to the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program. 563.3.1.1 Performance-based salary adjustments for these employees occur on the first day of the first pay period in July. 5.3.3.1.2 If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the feNewipg dulyapd�nill b� ho � tnaec i ssY..� eTe prorated based on date of hire or promotion. Page 2 of 5 V 5.3.4. Promotions 5.3.4.1. An employee ' who is promoted will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings. 5.3.4.1.1. The promoted employee's salary should be in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised. 5.3.4.1.2. The new salary will normally represent an increase of least 5.5 percent. 5.3.4.1.3. If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until the.feAewin 'Wy apd w.•"' employee.successfully,completes probation i nd may be prorated based on date of hire or promotion. 5.3.4.1.4. This section does not apply to"at-will" Executive Management employees. 5.4 New Local 501 Employees 5.4.1 Probation 5.4.1.1 New employees baF@@:AIR@ UR46 9th F thaR the 1404..AR An+l eU��na�nr" Who .successfully complete their Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment as regular employees, are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step(5.5%). 5.4.1.1.1 This adjustment is effective on the first day of the pay period that follows the date of completion of the Probationary Period (normally 26 weeks). The salary review date for subsequent annual reviews is the first day of the first pay period following 26 weeks of continuous service and satisfactory completion of probation. 5.4.1.1.2 The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is the first day of that pay period following the date when probation was successfully completed. Page 3 of 5 5.4.2 Reviews o 5.4.2.1 An employee who is not at the top of the salary range for their position is eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%) on their Salary Review date, provided their performance satisfactorily meets expectations. 5.4.2.2 Annual performance reviews shall be completed on a form provided by the Director of Human Resources. 5.4.3 Promotions 5.4.3.1 An employee who earns a promotion is entitled to a promotional increase of at least 5.5%, or to the base of the new range, which ever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. 5.4.3.1.1 If an employee has not successfully completed the promotional probationary period on their salary review date, any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. 5.4.3.1.2 A new salary review date is established for any promotion to a classification not in the Professional, Supervisory, Executive Management and Management Group. —55 Y-Rating 5.5.1 If the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a lower paid classification as a result of a classification study, the salary of the of the employee in that position shall remain unchanged (Y-rated) according to the following table: Years of Service Term of Y-rate 0- 3 One Year 4- 5 Two Years 6- 10 Three Years 11 -20 Four Years 21 or More Five Years 5.5.2 The Y-rate remains in effect until the salary range for the new classification equals or exceeds the employee's Y-rated salary, or until the tens of the Y-rate expires. Page 4 of 5 u 5.5.2.1 If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls within the range of the new classification, the employee shall be placed ea-Nhe siep._ abm�Fn of the new range nearest but not more than the Y-rated salary. 5.5.2.2 Employees become eligible for merit increases and range adjustments when the Y-rate is no longer in effect. 5.5.2.3 An employee who requests a voluntary reduction is not entitled to a Y-rate. 5.5.2.4 This section does not apply to "at-will" Executive Management employees. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 The General Manager is authorized to offer up to three (3)weeks of annual paid vacation to any prospective Executive Management employee if, in the judgment of the General Manager, such offer is necessary to attract the most qualified candidate. 6.1.1 The General Manager shall annually report all such appointments to the Board Subcommittee having responsibility for personnel matters. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS (Attach salary range exhibits when available) Page 5 of 5 Attachment 3 Orange County Policy Number: C30.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 Subject: APPRAISAL OF Supersedes: October 22, 1997 PERFORMANCE Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for the appraisal of employee performance. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy and the District's management philosophy that establishing an effective level of communication that offers consistent and continuing feedback on performance expectations and achievements will provide an environment in which our employees can perform to the best of their abilities. A performance appraisal program has been developed to provide a structure that will support the accomplishment of that goal. Important principles of the program include: 4.1.1 The District's overall mission is enhanced by establishing a connection between that mission and individual employees'responsibilities and objectives. 4.1.2 Recognizing employee strengths and identifying areas that may represent opportunities for improvement will affect current performance as well as enhance career potential. 4.1.3 Every individual has primary responsibility for their own performance and development. 4.1.4 The key role of the supervisor is to support an employee's efforts to maximize their own contribution and potential. Page I oft a 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 New employees will receive a performance appraisal at the close of their initial Probationary period to determine their suitability for continued employment with the District. An evaluation should also occur midway through the probationary period to ensure that performance expectations have been property communicated and established. This will also offer an opportunity,for both the employee and the supervisor to more effectively evaluate the desirability of continuing the employment relationship. 5.2 Employees who earn promotions should similarly receive a performance appraisal at the conclusion of the promotional probationary period. 5.3 An annual performance appraisal will be completed with each employee prior to their anniversary date. OCEA, Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management employees will receive a performance appraisal prior to any salary adjustment or merit bonus. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 Supervisors and managers will be notified by the Human Resources Department of all evaluations that must be completed at least 45 days in advance of the due date 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 2 ATTACHNEHT 4 - Orange County Policy Number: D90.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 a Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes: October 22, 1997 PROGRAM Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE This program is designed to encourage self-development of District's employees by providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational courses at accredited colleges, universities, or other approved institutions approvw_by the Huiium Resources and,Employge.1309elopment(HR.&ED)Division,provided that such courses are primarily for the purpose of: • increasing capabilities in Weis the employee's'.present positionsavithin the District • preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to advance within the District • updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED This policy applies to all. District employees who have oompleted their Initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19 hours per week This policy_does not apply to temporary employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1- Qualifying Employees: mill 12F,4 11 t mo All Disbict employees who have completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19, hours-per week hgw. biweakly-pay paned. 34 Tuition Reimbursement:a program in which qualifying employees who successfully complete District-approved courses,on their own time, at accredited colleges, universities or other appreued Institutions approved.by the HR,&ED DlQisiogf within the guidelines of this policy, can be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred. chnnsips, 4.0 POLICY The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete educationatcourses that serve the mission and goals of the District at the sole determination ofthe District aP liance with aesreditetlJastitutieae in eom P Sesues-1.C=RURRAS€k-MiA a11 t tha ded WI Page I of 5 based upon the number of hours worked per week as follows. HOURS OF WORK PER WEEK PERCENT OF REIMBURSEMENT 0-19 NOTEUGIBLE-0% 20-29 50% 30-39 75% 40 100% 5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Employees can be reimbursed for the following: • Specific,job-related associate, baccalaureate,and graduate degree programs-courses, • Specific,job-related courses through accredited colleges or universities • Specific,job-related courses offered through an appreved institution of study approved by the HR&ED Division The Division Manager is responsible for determining whether or not the course is 'job-related.' 5.2 When an employee successfully completes a course with a grade of "C"or better S;2d­2lQ­o44-and within the guidelines of this policy. the District will reimburse the employee We cost o. for eligible expenses incurred, based on the number of hours worked per week not to exceed$5,250 per calendar year. Examples of eligible and ineligible expenses are: Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses • Tuition •---pplisatiGA fees Mataria"Oes • Registration fees Travel • Laboratory fees Optional student fees • Parking fees Doctoral dissertation fees • Health fees • Masters thesis fees • Application fees Supplemental textbook costs • Required textbooks and Supplies and materials used materials per the.course for the course and retained by syllabus the employee after course • Supplies required per the complefion(i.e., paper, course syllabus not to pencils,notebooks,diskettes, exceed$100.00 per etc.) course Graduation or diploma fees 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program,employees must submit a completed Tuition Reimbursement Application(attachment A)and a copy of the course description which includes the course cost, course start/end date,and number of units for each course to.the HR&ED Division NO LATER THAN one dayprior to the course start date: • Tuition Reimbursement Applications received in the HR&ED Division on or after the course start date will not be approved. Page 2 of 5 6.2 'The HR&ED DiiedWeloodesignee)will sign completed applications. A'copy of the approved application wilibe mailed interoffice to the employee to be re,,su6n eed._ upon cour5.e_Co_mpletion: 6.3 Incomplete applications will be returned to the'emptoyee'with explanatipn(s) attached. 6A We Appwva4psecess 6.4.1 6.4.1.2 6.4.2 8 v gimp. 6.4.2.4 men apppqval' 6.5 6.5.1 Upon oourselcorripletion,the dmployee must complete and submit a Requestfor Tuition Reimbursement(attachment B)along with(1)an official record of the final grade,(2)Itemized receipts for eligible expenses,(3)a copy of the course syllabus.(if requesting reimbursement for required-textbooks, materials and/or supplies)and(4)a copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to the HR&,ED.Division wffhie 60 calendar days following the course end date. 6.5.2 Page 3 of 5 ej. ig; 6 — • Requests for Tuition Reimbursement received in the HR&ED Division more than 60 days after the course end date will not be approved. 6.5.3 The HR&.ED Manager(or designee)will sign completed requests. Copies of the approved request will be mailed interoffice to the employee and submitted to the Accounting Division for reimbursement. 6.5.4 Incomplete requests willbe returned to the employee with explanabon(s) attached, 6.5.5 9e60aneatahi Aivisierw amplWYAR Ad gat All Pe MhwR@MAAt stat-A 6.5.5.4 AGR apl;FG-21, 7.0 EXCEPTIONS --7-1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made. 7.2 This policy does not apply to temporary employees.. 7.3 EmployAns will Ant ba 7.3 Reimbursement may be authorized whenever the employee's manager and HR & ED Manager(or designee)determine that there is substantial benefit to be derived by the District when an employee takes a course nc pre8carw that does not meet the requirements of s policy. 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 Page 4 of 5 8.2 Tuition.Reimbu-3ementApplications received in the HR 8;ED Division on or , alter Me course start date all/not be approved. 8.3 Requests fohTuition Reimbursement received in the HR&ED Division more ! than 60 daysa/terthe course end deter-will not be approved, 8.4 All funds'received by an employee under this program within a twelve-month' period prior to the date of voluntary_ termination of employment with the District shall be,repaid by,the employee; 8.2 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee meets the criteria specified in this policy. 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended. 9.2 Sections 127 and 132-J8 of the Internal Revenue Code. 9.3 Tuition Reimbursement Application.(attachrnem A) 9.4 Request for Tuition Reimbursement(aysphment B) Page 5 of Orange County Sanitation District TUITION REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATION To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program,the employee must complete and submit a Tuition Reimbursement Application(Nis form)and a copy of the course description which Includes the come cost,course starllend date and number of units for each course to the Human Resources and Employee Development(HR g ED)Division NO LATER THAN ore day prior to the course start date. REQUESTS RECEIVED ON OR AFTER THE COURSE START DATE WILL NOT BE APPROVED. I. Employee Name: Division: Extension: 2. Employment Status: ❑ Regular,full-time ❑ Part-time(fl of hours per week: ) ❑ Temporary ❑ Probationary(probation ends[monthlyew]:_) ❑ Contract 3. Nativist Work Schedule(indicate days of week and hours ojwork): 4. Name and location(city,state)of College,University or Institution of Study: 5. Do you expect to receive any other type of Tuition Assistance? ❑YES ❑ NO S. COURSE INFORMATION: COURSE ESTIMATED START END START END COURSE TITLE UNITS NUMBER cons DATE DATE TIME TIME 7. Degree Program? ❑YES If yes,indicate type of degree and field of study ❑ NO If no,indicate reason for taking course By signing this application, I understand that upon successful completion of the course indicated above, the District will reimburse the associated costs in accordance with Policy D90.00 of the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. Should 1 voluntarily terminate my employment with the District, I agree to repay the District any funds received under this program within the twelve-month period prior to the date of my voluntary termination. 1 expressly agree to repay the District one- twelfth(1/12)of the amount owed every month for a total period of twelve(12)months commencing on the month following the month of my voluntary termination. If the amount owed is less than $200.00, 1 expressly authorize the District to deduct the entire amount due from my final paycheck. Employee Signature: Date: By signing this application,I agree that the course indicated above is mission specific and/or job related. Division Manager's Approval Signature: Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ❑ Your application for reimbursement has NOT been approved. Explanation(s)attached. ❑ Your application for reimbursement has been APPROVED. A blank Request for Tuition Reimbursement form is attached. HR g ED Director(or designee)Signature: Date: ATTACHMENT A Orange County Sanitation District REQUEST FOR TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Upon course completion, the employee must complete and submit a.Request for Tuition Reimbursement (this r form) along with an official record of the final grade, itemized receipts for eligible expenses, a copy of the course syllabus(if requesting reimbursement for required textbooks, materials or supplies) and a copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to the Human Resources Employee Development(HR& ED)Division within 60 calendar days following the course end date. LATE REQUESTS WILL NOT BE APPROVED. 1. Employee Name: Division: Extension: 2. COURSE INFORMATION: COURSE COURSE TITLE ACTUAL START END NUMBER COSTS DATE DATE 3. ALL of the following eligible expense documents are attached: ❑Official Record of final grade(s) ❑ Receipt(s) for tuition and eligible fees ❑ A copy of the course syllabus(ifrequesting reimbursement for required textbooks,materials and/or supplies) ❑A copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application 4. 1 request reimbursement in the amount of$ By signing this request, I understand that the District will reimburse the associated costs for the course indicated above in accordance with Policy D90.00 of the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. Should I voluntarily terminate my employment with the District, I agree to repay the District any funds received under this program within the twelve-month period prior to the date of my voluntary termination. 1 expressly agree to repay the District one-twelfth (1/12)of the amount owed every month for a total period of twelve(12) months commencing on the month following the month of my voluntary termination. If the amount owed is less than S200.00,I expressly authorize the District to deduct the entire amount due from my final paycheck. Employee Signature: Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ❑ Your Tuition Reimbursement Request has NOT been approved. Explanation(s)allached. ❑ Your Tuition Reimbursement Request been APPROVED in the amount of$ and forwarded to the Accounting Division on .reference#: HR&ED Director(or designee)Signature: Date: ATTACHMENT B r FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ea.al Dtr. SI10/00 5r14100 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR003g 15fa1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CREATE THREE NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND CHANGE THE TITLE OF ONE CLASSIFICATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-10, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for: (1) Create Accounting Supervisor classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86,064); (2) Create Human Resources Supervisor classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86-064); (3) Create Lead Pump Power Operator at pay range 2015 ($47,285- $58,883); and, (4) Change the title of Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator. SUMMARY Frorn time to time, adjustments need to be made to a classification structure. As new duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the organization, new classifications must be added or titles must be changed. Staff has identified four adjustments that need to be made to the classification structure. The proposed structure adjustments will not result in any individual salary increases. The recommended modifications are as follows: 1. An Accounting Supervisor classification be created at pay range E11 ($60,828-$86,064). A supervisory level classification is needed to supervise the day-to-day activities of the Accounts Receivable staff. The average market rate for an Accounting Supervisor, according to the 1999/2000 Watson Wyatt Data Services Salary Survey, is $71,800. The midpoint, or market reference point, of pay range El is $73,452. The El midpoint is 2.3% above market, however, the El pay range midpoint is $69,900 which is 2.7% below market. The El pay range was chosen because it is closer to the actual market rate. Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 1. N w enuv •aa�a ne•.aa ae,nmv000emm�wM.Frwmnsao+i<m Nol.a: a�i.a. a-xiHe Page 1 2. A Human Resources Supervisor classification be created at pay range El ($60,828-$86,064). Currently, the Director of Human Resources is the only supervisory/management level classification in the Human Resources department. A supervisory level classification is needed to supervise the day- to-day activities of the Human Resources staff and to provide technical support to other departments. The average market rate for a Human Resources Supervisor, according to the 1999/2000 Watson Wyatt Data Services Salary Survey, is $73,500. The midpoint, or market reference point, of pay range El is $73,452. Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 2. 3. A Lead Pump Power Operator classification be created at pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883). The Senior Operations Supervisor position in the Pump Power division was eliminated earlier this year. The Pump Power division will move from Operations to Maintenance later this year. A Lead level classification is needed to ensure that an effective reporting structure is maintained as the Central Generation division is moved from Operations to Maintenance. The incumbent of the Senior Operations Supervisor position earned an annual salary of$74,836. This Lead position, therefore, reduces the payroll cost from $74,836 to approximately$53,084 resulting in an annual savings of$21,752. This classification is comparable in duties and pay level to the Lead Electrical Technician and Lead Instrumentation Technician classifications at pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883). Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 3. 4. Change the title of the Senior Plant Operator classification to Lead Plant Operator to maintain consistency between the Plant Operators Series and the Pump Power Operators Series (see recommendation number 3 above). A pay range adjustment is not requested as the duties and responsibilities of the classification will remain the same. This action will change the title only. Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 4. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A H\vry Ugendal& AgeMa Repft1 B 'd ggen aRlp ft .ryem 15W)tlx Reis � Page 2 v RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-10 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit "A° of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.00, Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H:\wp.oa`ad min%B SVRe Ia ons\2000V'610.doo No. 1205 Date: 5/24/00 Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Accounting Supervisor Distinguishing Characteristics Under general supervision, provides specialized or general analysis support while supervising the activities of various accounting functions such as Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Payroll, General Ledger, etc. Performs accounting duties of a complex nature requiring advanced professional experience, knowledge and competency in accounting theory and principles. Prepares difficult journal entries and reconciliations. May be responsible for the maintenance of a complete set of accounting records for a functional area. Provides interpretation of accounts, methods and records for management. Example of Duties Supervises professional accounting staff and/or support staff involved in various accounting functions such as AP, AR, Payroll, and General Ledger. Plans, schedules and reviews work of staff. Establishes performance criteria and production requirements. Hires, trains, evaluates and disciplines staff. Compiles data for and prepares budget estimates for the current year and recommendations for the next year for the Joint Operating budget and the individual Revenue Area Operating budgets, taking into consideration actual and estimated expenses. Performs general ledger analyses, including analyses of quarterly expenses and explaining variance from budget and prior year figures. Reconciles various asset, liability and expense accounts in the General Ledger. Oversees and administers the Revenue functions of the District including invoicing, collections, daily cash deposits, the User Fee/Reconciliation Program and the Sewer Service Fee Program. Reviews and approves any adjustments to original invoices. Oversees the reconciliation of Accounts Receivable. Invoices Wastehauler charges, Industrial Use charges and Retiree Premium charges. Administers the collections of delinquent accounts and administers permit violations. Oversees and administers the Accounts Payable function ensuring that all invoices are paid in accordance with board authority, policies and procedures. Administers invoice reimbursement agreements to ensure that local agencies and others are billed for the share of work completed in accordance with contracts. Oversees the activities of the Payroll function, ensuring accuracy and timeliness of processing the District's payroll. Page 1 of 2 No. 1205 Date: 5/24100 Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Accounting Supervisor Minimum Qualifications Bachelors Degree in Accounting or related field. Five years of experience in Accounting, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and payroll, preferably in a government environment. Must be able to demonstrate the ability to supervise professional and support staff. Knowledge of accepted governmental accounting theory, principles, and practices. Strong verbal and written communication skills. Excellent analytical and computer skills, including proficiency with PC spreadsheet, database and word processing software. Experience with JDEdwards World or OneWorld financial information system is a plus. License or Certificate Required None \badonWatallwp.dfa h IOlmckinleylClassDesmptionsTINANCE�Wgsupv.jD.doc Page 2 of 2 Attachment 2 No. 8110 Date: 5/24100 Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Human Resources Supervisor Distinguishing Characteristics This is the supervisory classification in the Human Resources Series. Incumbent assists the Director of Human Resources in determining division objectives, supervises staff involved in Human Resources administration, and provides technical support to other departments. Incumbent receives administrative direction from the Director of Human Resources. Work is reviewed at the completion of assigned projects to determine if overall results and objectives have been achieved. Example of Duties Supervises professional and support staff involved in the administration of Human Resources activities including benefits, employee relations, human resources information system, employment and employee services. Plans, schedules and reviews work of staff; establishes performance criteria and production requirements; and hires, trains, evaluates and disciplines staff. Develops, implements and administers Human Resources policies and procedures. Assists in the development of short and long range Human Resources plans. Participates in the development of the Human Resources department budget. Develops and administers programs designed to establish and maintain effective employee relations through the uniform and equitable application of District's policies and procedures. Investigates employee relations issues and recommends appropriate actions to address and resolve these issues. Counsels with and advises employees of available assistance in the treatment and resolution of job related or personal problems. Participates in exit interviews and grievance procedures. Supervises the administration activities, including maintenance of employee records; processing employee status change forms; preparing reports and statistical summaries; and responding to credit and reference inquiries on active and terminated employees. Prepares reports, memorandum and correspondence and makes presentations to District employees, including management, regarding Human Resources administration. Page 1 of 2 No. B110 Date: 5/24/00 Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Human Resources Supervisor Minimum Qualifications Bachelors Degree in Human Resources, related field, or equivalent experience. Five years of experience designing, implementing and administering policies and procedures in the areas of employee relations, employment and employee benefits. Must be able to demonstrate the ability to supervise staff involved in the administration of Human Resources activities as well as the ability to analyze and interpret Federal and State laws and regulations regarding Human Resources management. Ability to prepare clear and concise documents regarding training programs and communicate effectively, both orally and in writing. License or Certificate Required None. H:\wp.dtaNMl OVnckinleytClaeBDeaenpuona W R%Mupv.ID.doo Page 2 of 2 Attachment 3 n No. 5120 Date: 524/00 ' mm Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Lead Pump Power Operator Distinguishing Characteristics This is the senior level classification in the Pump Power Operator series. Incumbents report directly to the Supervisor of Central Generation facilities. Incumbents are assigned to larger and more complex duties and provide technical direction and training to less experienced personnel involved in the operations, light maintenance and repair of the power plants and associated equipment and systems. Includes responsibility for the generation of electrical power, light maintenance activities, and inspection of the methane gas engine generator sets and auxiliary equipment. This position is also a floater position and as such is subject to assignment to cover vacant shifts at both plants as needed. Work is reviewed periodically for soundness of technical judgment and to determine if overall facility objectives have been achieved. Example of Duties Provides technical direction including assessment of performance of Pump Power Operators involved in the operation, inspection and light maintenance of power plant equipment and associated systems. Reviews work orders for work to be performed, coordinates work among less experienced personnel and provides technical and safety training to Pump Power Operators. Generates and distributes 12,000 volt power throughout the wastewater treatment plant by operating and maintaining internal combustion engines, steam turbine generators, chiller refrigeration and air conditioning systems, energy steam systems and auxiliary support and safety equipment such as pumps, compressors, fans, valves, filters, equipment drives and motors. Operates standby generators to generate electrical power in emergency situations according to utility power. Monitors and controls distribution of electrical power throughout the plant by either making manual adjustments to equipment or by operating computer control systems designed to monitor trends and start and stop engines, pumps and electrical switchgears. Monitors the M-SCADA software program designed to control and monitor the electrical system. Performs routine preventative maintenance on power generation equipment such as cleaning air filters, adjustment packings, scheduling repairs and monitoring vibrations, chemicals and oil. May perform emergency repairs on power generation equipment, as directed, or assist other divisions with repairs. Operates switchgears and performs isolations, shut-downs, tag out and start-ups of power generation equipment before and after testing, maintenance and emergency repairs. Page 1 of 2 No. 5120 D Date: 5/24/00 Revised: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Approved: CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION Title: Lead Pump Power Operator Example of Duties (cont.) Monitors, controls and records water, oil and air pressures, temperatures, flows, gas levels and test results by reading meters, gauges, charts and instruments. Completes daily operating logs of routine and unusual operating or maintenance conditions encountered and any repair work performed. Initiates work orders, memos and requests for maintenance repairs. Gathers power and heat data for Monthly Summary of Operations and prepares special reports as required. Maintains work area to ensure safety and order, picks up , receives, stores and inventories supplies, may operate electric crane to lift equipment and supplies. Minimum Qualifications Four years of experience in the operation and maintenance of electrical power generation equipment such as gas engines, pumps and compressors, with at least two of those years at the Pump Power Operator level. An advanced knowledge of electrical power generation principles, methods, tools and equipment, safety procedures, testing procedures, chemicals and regulatory requirements. Know how to perform basic mathematical calculations sufficient to record daily readings and know how to operate test equipment such as computer combustion analyzer, computer vibration analyzer, dial indicator and flow balance indicator. Ability to record data regarding power generation performance and communicate, both orally and in writing. Must be willing to work shifts, weekends and holidays. License or Certificate Required Possession of a valid California class C driver's license. H:Vwp.dtalhf5l0Mokinley0assDescdptonslOPSUead pump opemlor.jD.dcc Page 2 of 2 Attachment 4 v snore Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Administrative and Clerical ExhaltA FPay Range Minimum Maximum Classificatlons FLSA Statue NE8 44,809 58,182 Information Services Technician 111 Non-Exempt NE7 42,301 55,195 Financial Technician Non-Exempt NE7 42,301 55,195 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Senior Sloreskeeper Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt NEB 38.501 50,155 Information Services Technician II Non-Exempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Information Services Technician I Non-Exempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Secretary Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior OMcs Aide Non-Exempt NE3 31,651 41,001 Stcreskeeper Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38.750 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt NE2 29.800 38,750 Office Aide Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,780 Office Specialist Non-Exempt NE7 23,250 30.184 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt NE7 23,250 30,164 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt Orange County Sanitation Olatrict Classification By Employee Group Engineering pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status NE9 49,001 63,611 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt NE9 49,001 63,611 Engineering Associate Non-Exempt NES 44,809 88,182 Construction Inspector Nan-Exempt NE7 42,301 65,195 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt NE5 38,200 47,066 Engineering Aide 11 Non-Exempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Engineering Aide l Nan-Exempt r Oconee County Sanitation Oistrict Classifications By Employee Group Technical Services pay Renee MInImYm Maximum Classifications FLSA Statue NE8 44.808 58,182 Environmental Specialist II Non-Exempt NE8 d4,808 58,102 Source Control Inspector ll Non-Exempt NE8 44,808 58,182 Senior Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt NEB 36,501 50,155 Environmental Specialist I Non-Exempt NEB 38,501 50,155 Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt NEB 38,501 50,155 Source Control Inspector l NomExempt NE4 33,800 44,027 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt Q Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Confidential Pay Range Minimum Maximum Claselficatlone FLSA Status NE7 42,301 55,195 Examine Assistant ll Nan-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,156 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt NEB 38.501 60,155 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt NE6 38,501 50,155 Principal Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt NE2 29,800 38,750 Office Specialist Non-Exempt tl sxm Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Operations and Maintenance(501( Pay Rartpe Mlnlmum Maximum Claeelficadons FLSA Status 2015 47.286 58,883 Lead Electrical Technician Nan-Exempt 2015 47,285 58.883 Lead Instrumentation Technician Non-Exempt .... _.._ . '201b _ 47,285 58,683 Lead Pump..Pointer Oparalor _ � Nor Exempt 2014 44778 55,749 Electrcal Technician It Non-Exempt 2014 44,778 55,748 Instrumentation Technician ll Non-Exempt 2013 43,258 53,868 Lead Mechanic Non-Exempt 2013 43.258 53,868 Pump Power Operator Non-Exempt 2013 43,258 53,888 Load Plant Operator Non-Exempt 9043 43,769 57,9ba SaabcPloaLOpawWr Moe-Bxaayl 2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt 2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt 2012 41,812 52.080 Machinist Non-Exempt 2011 39.304 48,949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt 2011 39.304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt 2010 39.040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47,285 Builder Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47,285 Electrical Technician l Non-Exempt 2009 37,979 47,285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt 2008 37,737 46,973 Plant Operator Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42,969 Electrical Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42,969 Instrumentation Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt 2007 34,505 42,969 Painter Non-Exempt 2007 34.505 42,989 Senior Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt 20117 34,605 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt 2008 33.590 41,812 Mechanic Non-Exempt 2005 31,348 39,040 Collection Facilities Worker ll Non-Exempt 2005 31,348 39.040 Maintenance Worker Non- Exempt 2004 30,938 38,509 Operator In Training NonExsmpt 2003 29,875 37,207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt 2002 29,490 38,700 Control Center Clark Non-Exempt 2001 24,184 30,093 Collection Facilities Worker I Non.Exempt 2000 22,882 28,502 Helper Non-Exempt Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Professional Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status E14 $70.380 $99.600 Chief Scientist Exempt E13 $67,128 $94.932 Assistant to the General Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94.932 Senior Engineer Exempt E12 $63.%B $90,468 Senior Scientist Exempt E12 $63,946 $90,468 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt Ell $60,828 $86.064 Engineer Exempt Ell 560,828 $86.064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt E10 $57.852 $81,948 Secretary to the Board of Directors Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 $65.212 $78,156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt E9 $55,212 $78.156 Project Specialist Exempt E9 555,212 $78,156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Scientist Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Acccunlanl Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt E9 $55.212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt Ell $52.500 $74.292 Associate Engineer III Exempt Ell $52,600 $74,292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt Ell $52.500 $74,292 Safety&Emergency Response Specialist Exempt E7 $50,064 $70,848 Programmer Analyst Exempt E7 550,064 $70.848 Computer Hardware Specialist Exempt E7 550,064 $70.848 Telecommunications Specialist Exempt E7 550,064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt E7 $50.064 $70,848 Contracts Administrator Exempt ES 547,640 $67,392 Principal Laboratory&Research Analyst Exempt E6 $47,640 $67,392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt E5 $46,396 $64,212 Associate Engineer II Exempt E5 545,396 $64.212 $enlor Accountant Exempt E5 $45.396 $64.212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt E5 $45,396 $64,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt E5 545,396 $64,212 Senior Environmental Specialist Exempt E4 $43,248 $61,236 Safety Representative Exempt E4 $43,248 $61,236 Programmer Exempt E4 $43,248 $61,236 Senior Buyer Exempt E3 $41.136 558,260 Associate Engineer l Exempt E2 $39.252 $55,486 contracts Specialist Exempt El $37,294 $52,908 Accountant Exempt E1 $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt E1 $37.284 $52,908 Financial Analyst Exempt E1 $37,284 $52,908 Management Analyst Exempt P zxum Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Supervisory vay Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA SIatus E14 $70,380 $99,600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt E13 $67,128 $94.932 En ironmental Management Supervisor Exempt E12 563,90 $90.468 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt E71 S60,828 $86,a64 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt E71 $60,828 $56,064 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt Ell $60,828 $86,064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt E71 $80,828 586,054 Contracts&Purchasing Supervisor Exempt Ell 560,828 $116.064 Accounting Supervisor Exempt E71 _ $60.828 $86.0_64 Human Resources Supernsar Exempt _ Eg $55.212 $78,156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt E9 $55.212 $78.156 Operations Supervisor Exempt E9 555.212 $78.156 Source Control Supervisor Exempt E9 $55.212 $7$156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt E9 555.212 $78,156 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt e Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Management Pay Range Minimum Maximum Classigca0ons FLSA Sbtus E16 $77,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt E16 $77,688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt E16 $77,688 $109,812 Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring Manager Exempt E16 $77.688 $109,812 Laboratory Manager Exempt E16 $77,688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt E15 $73,956 $104,616 Controller Exempt E15 $73.956 $104.616 Financial Manager Exempt EIS $73,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt EIS $73.956 $104,616 Contracts 6 Purchasing Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Safety/Emergency Response Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94,932 Maintenance Manager Exempt E13 $67.128 $94.932 Human Resources Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Operations Manager Exempt E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technobgy Manager Exempt m� 1 Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Executive Management PoY Rarga Minimum Maximum Clasai0ea8oru FLEA Status E27 $154,596 $154,596 General Manager Exempt E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of Engineering Exempt E19 $07,180 $139,980 Director of Operations B Maintenance Exempt E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt E79 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Technical Services Exempt E18 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt E18 $85,992 $139.464 Director of Information Technology Exempt E17 $76,876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt E13 367,128 $94,932 Director of Communications Exempt I n� Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group "Nonitegular"Part Time Pay Range I Minimum Maximum Classifications IFLSA Status NEO 9,000 16-000 Intem Non-Exempt FAHRCOMMITTEE Mee0ngDate ToW.ofDir. 05/10/00 05/24/00 AGENDA REPORT hem Numtw Item Numh FARR 41 15(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE POLICY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities Capacity Charge rate and structure until the Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Program is modified. SUMMARY The current Capital Facilities Capacity Charge structure was adopted as the culmination of the Strategic Plan Rate Advisory Committee work in 1999. The structure is based upon the Capital Investment Equalization Method of computing the rates. This method has been used at the District since 1989 and uses the historical cost of facilities, the projected additions to 2020, and the number of projected users at 2020. Because two of the three factors used in this calculation are only officially updated during Strategic Plan or Master Plan updates, staff is proposing that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge remain constant between Master Plan updates. These updates have historically been completed every five years. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Recompute the CFCC annually based upon the budgeted Capital Improvement Program and follow the Proposition 218 notification and hearing process. x�.ren Pd Ag. R@Wft Ca rd�a.wbm M15(h)�m e«,wa._ aiase Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None. GGSAc M AW. A.-I.newmnsoaxm 151n1 me na,,.n arna9a Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE NeeongDM Toga.urolr. 5/10/00 5/I4/W AGENDA REPORT IMm Mmb 1tr NumbC FAHRg K 15ri1 Orange County Sanitapon District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total contracts by $200,000, from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and approve funding in the amount of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01. SUMMARY Temporary services for the District are comprised of both capital and non-capital projects. 15% of the temp needs are non-capital and 85% are capital. Additional temporary staffing is required as a result of a peak in capital improvement projects outlay during the five-year period through fiscal year 2004. This need for capital-related temporary services is in addition to the need for services for daily operations at the District. The need for temporary services to support the projected future capital improvement program was discussed with and approved by the PDC Committee in April 1999 (see attached). The Temporary Employment Services Agenda Item, FAHR99-50, approved by the FAHR Committee, estimated $1,000,000 per year cap on all temporary employment services for the District, included capital as well as non-capital related temporary services. We anticipate a $200,000 shortfall for this fiscal year. As the capital improvement program continues to increase over the next four years, capital- related temporary services for engineering, inspection, and support services will need to be increased. Based on the current capital-improvement programfoutlay schedule, the District will need an additional $200,000 in temporary employment services for FY 99-00, including non-capital related temporary employment services. For FY 00-01 this amount is anticipated to increase to $2,402,000 and may reach a high of$3,870,000 FY 02-03. The increase in capital-related resource needs is a result of capital projects that will move from the design process to the construction phase. As the design work moves to the construction phase, additional staff will be needed. The cost of the capital-related temporary services will be paid by the capital project budget. These costs do not impact the cost per million gallons. Staff is recommending the above-described increases in Temporary Employment Services. Staff recognizes that the degree of escalating costs associated with temporary contract service-workers are unexpected, and previously not forecasted. For this reason, we will NWgM�vpaMVNmN NpnG Aspem�mooewm Apsnp�RapabbyAUbm lfini da Page 1 be conducting a cost analysis during the first half of FY 00-01 to accurately address the advantage of regular employees verses contract service workers. _ PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Year Capital I Non-Capital I Total 99—00 $ 970.000 $230 000 S7 200,000 00—01 2125 000 277,000 $2,402,000 01 —02 3.095 000 275,000 $3,370 000 02—03 3,595,000 275 000 $3 870 000 03—04 2,475,000 275,1300 $2 750,000 For information only, funding amounts to be proposed and approved in subsequent Fiscal Years. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Discussion The District's staff has recognized a significant need for contract-service workers due to an increase in capital projects for the next five years. Our capital improvement project budget is expected to increase from $70,000,000 today to $198,700,000 by fiscal year 2005. As information, this capital outlay represents over 180 various projects throughout the treatment and collections facility. Most of these projects were identified in the Strategic Plan adopted by the Board in 1999. Other projects are added to the CIP that have been identified by staff and recommended by the EMT and the General Manager. The projected capital outlay for fiscal year 2000-01 is $83,007,000. In April 1999, the Engineering Department presented a program to the PDC Committee that would provide contract-service worker resources to conduct the capital project work. The proposed program consisted of hiring contract-engineering services during the associated five-year peak capital outlay period. FAHR Item 99-50, in June 1999, requested $1,000,000 in funding for temporary employment services which included the proposed capital improvement contract engineering staff. Due to the fact that the staff recommendation to FAHR included the contract engineering services staff for the capital-related program, as well as non-capital related temporary services, the $1.000,000 did not accurately reflect the needs of the District. The purpose of this agenda item is to request additional funding to cover the shortage during the current fiscal year for temporary services supporting the CIP, and to provide a forecast for additional funds for the next three years. (These amounts will be subject to approval by the board when the budget for each of those three years are adopted each June.) M ny wupenearBnra Aeewa Pepoiuvom mare•geNa Pegxbb5[Mem•XI� A...� , Page 2 As the capital improvement program activities ramp up, additional contract-services will be required for project management, design, reviews, coordination, and inspection. For example, as the current design projects move into construction, additional construction engineers and inspectors must be obtained. Staff has estimated that additional contract service-workers will ultimately be required for capital-related activities. These additional temporary resources will be required in the Design, Process Engineering, Construction, Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems and the Process Control Integration Divisions. The increase in capital outlay has impacted the 0&M Department as a result of coordinating capital activities with the Engineering Department, reviewing construction plans and specifications, developing facility process-control strategy for the new projects, planning for construction sequencing and connections to existing facilities, assisting with plant start-ups and shut-downs, visiting various collection and treatment plant sites with consultants, attending meetings, arranging for sewer flow monitoring and/or video taping as required by capital project needs, and coordination between capital activities and ongoing treatment plant operations. In addition, the temporary engineering resources will be used to ensure field staff safety, for locating utilities, and for reviewing designs for operability and maintenance friendliness. The O&M Department currently has one contract-engineer in the Process Engineering Division to support the treatment plant capital improvement program and requires a second to provide support for the collections system capital program. The requirements for Information Technology related services and support continue to rise above the Departments current resource level. Many of these requirements are short-term or project oriented and can be met by augmenting permanent staff with temporary contract support. This strategy gives Information Technology the flexibility to manage its peak workloads associated with programming, analysis, project management, and hardware/software support. Further, this strategy will provide Information Technology with the temporary staff required to support the increased volume of capital project work now going into design. Funding Funding for capital improvement contract service-workers is already recognized through the particular capital project being worked on, and is budgeted by the particular capital budget process. The temporary service-worker contracts for operating requirements are budgeted within the Operating Fund. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and put certain projects on hold. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Term Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a speck end dale. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. HM'V-SaOgnMa�BVN,�ppMa ReW'h1YJLV&vN�9e^4+ReW�GSNhm I'vn.trc Page 3 CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50 PDC Item Number PDC99-20 H My EhYp�ApS ReWr61]IW MAgm ReGuhNY0.Mm 150dw R.. woes Page 4 FAHIRCOMMITTEE Meeting Dae I To Be.ofDtr. s/s/9s wzwss AGENDA REPORT hem Number Item Number FAMRsyso Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-1 86) to the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agency • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems - IT Personnel • Lab Support - Laboratory personnel 2. Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary fines as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. SUMMARY The District has typically had short-term, low-volume temporary staffing needs and has contracted with one or two agencies to fulfill them. However, temporary staffing utilization is increasing with additional Engineering and IT projects. Since the increase in temporary costs exceeds $100,000, Board approval is needed. Three-quarters of the District's temporary labor needs are due to the increase in capital projects for the next five years. The Engineering department has already obtained approval from the Planning and Design Committee for the increase in the temporary staffing budget and will continue to provide the PDC with regular updates. Human Resources has interviewed each company listed in the recommendation and is satisfied that they can meet administrative requirements of doing business with the District. In the General Agency category, Apple One has agreed to a 40-50% markup rate for general, clerical, and light industrial staffing. Other companies have been used N lny.GhlaynM•�rW FFJ�nF/.Xgtp•A.•ol •.;,.,. eim•e Page 1 in the past, but only Apple One has been able to consistently supply the District with high quality temporary employees. The technical firms work a little differently than the general temporary agencies. Instead of negotiating a markup rate up front, the Engineering and IT departments plan to put temporary staffing opportunities out to all of the qualified firms above and have them compete against each other for each assignment. Those companies who find the most qualified candidate at the lowest price will be selected on a case-by-case basis. Instead of listing out all of the requirements that the temporary staffing firms need in order to do business with the District, a copy of the Districts generic temporary services contract is attached. Each company will need to sign it, or one like it, and agree to the proper insurance and employment practices. Because there may be other technical agencies we wish to use, and because the posting of the jobs will be an openly competitive process, staff is asking for the authority to enter into similar agreements with other agencies without having to return to the Board to approve each agency. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not to exceed $1 million BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: J.O. Contractual Services and Capital Improvement Budgets) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Hire additional regular, full-time employees for an indefinite period or on a contractual basis. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Sample generic Temporary Services Contract X�ft, px�4'A a� MRUA R. ear Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE "eomr Toee.orar. oo/ar/es oeru ss AGENDA REPORT eem Numbs ][Imn Numn wcssm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: Temporary Staffing Plan for Engineering Department GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve temporary staffing plan for the Engineering Department; (2)Authorize staff to negotiate contracts with staffing firms for temporary staffing; and (3) Delegate authority for temporary staffing contract oversight to the PDC Committee. SUMMARY As an outcome of the Strategic Plan, a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been developed. The new CIP establishes a program of capital improvements in the collection system and treatment plants to meet the needs of the District through the year 2020, totaling $1.5 billion. The CIP includes treatment plant capacity and improvement projects, collection system capacity and relief projects, and rehabilitation projects in both the treatment plants and collection system. The CIP also includes participation in Phase 1 of the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District, and cooperative programs with our member cities and sanitary agencies including projects to address inflow and infiltration reduction and water conservation. Based on the planning assumptions used in the Strategic Plan and the projected population and flow projections developed, a preliminary project implementation schedule has been developed to meet those future needs of the District's service area. The schedule calls for a substantial increase in the number of projects and associated capital expenditures over the next four to six years. The Engineering Department staffing levels have remained relatively stable over the past few years, varying between 61 and 74 full-time equivalents (FTEs). The CIP annual expenditures for collections system and treatment plant projects in that same time frame have varied between $30 and $50 million. In comparison, the annual expenditures associated with the new CIP for collections system and treatment plant projects are expected to be between $75 and $100 million over the next four to six years. Beyond six years, the projected levels of capital expenditures will reduce to current levels. Due to this projected increase in the number of projects and expenditures over the next four to six years, the current staffing level in the Engineering Department will not be sufficient to allow the planning, design, and implementation of the new CIP. To be able to address the short-term staffing needs in the Engineering Department, a plan has been drafted H:ao.aw.w,a.wocwoceeeennsw.m.a.mo w .ow,ac.� w.a.,. Page 1 that will use temporary technical staffing. Contract project managers, engineers, and construction inspectors will be used to supplement full-time staff on an as- needed basis. The plan will be flexible, in that temporary staff with the necessary skills can be brought on at the appropriate time, and can be released when the assignment is over. It also provides management the ability to easily release personnel that are not performing to expectations at any time. This will assure that the program will remain cost-efficient and effective in getting the work accomplished. The proposed CIP project budgets include the costs for engineering, administration, construction, and contingencies. All of the proposed project budgets include estimates for engineering consultants, as well as the staff costs to oversee the project design and construction, which would include the costs for the temporary staff. Several temporary staffing firms have been contacted to discuss the availability of temporary technical staff and the expected costs. It appears that sufficient resources with the required skills are available in the market place to meet our needs. The temporary staffing firms attract people by offering a competitive salary and a full benefit package, including dental and medical health coverage, insurance, holiday pay, sick and vacation pay, as well as 401 K retirement saving plans. The cost to the District to employ temporary staff approaches the cost of hiring full-time employees. The Human Resources Department has begun preliminary discussions with these firms to establish contract terms, salary markups, and profit margins. Staff is recommending that a program be established that would allow temporary staffing to meet the needs of the Engineering Department in implementing the new CIP. For the purpose of monitoring the program, Staff would bring to the PDC Committee on a quarterly basis, and for the duration of the program, a request-for expected staffing needs for the upcoming quarter, including required technical disciplines, project assignments and budgets, as well as a history of the past quarters. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) All budgets for proposed capital projects include estimated staff costs for project management and support through design, construction, and startup, which would cover the costs of temporary staff. Haw s ,vim.NDIN c a�: ermae Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NIA ALTERNATIVES Hire permanent, full-time staff to support the proposed CIP or significantly cut back the proposed CIP to match the existing staff capacity to do the work. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Treatment Plant and Collection System Graph X M.haHOe^dVIX.V IXBxWPRS�B&$J.AI6nB Rdn.Ol01 W 0¢ Page 3 V MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT April 17, 2000, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on April 17, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: Director Norm Eckenrode Director Iry Pickier, Chair Director Peer Swan -Absent Director Philip L. Anthony Director Jan Debay Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Donald F. McIntyre Director Kelly Rowe Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Blake Anderson William Mills Jr. Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Dave Halverson Jill Everhart Bob Getter, Brown & Caldwell Jim Harris Cindy Gehman Dave Murray, Brown & Caldwell Wendy Sevenandl John Kennedy Rick Davis, NCG Porter Novell) Michelle Tuchman Greg Leslie Fred Soroushian, CH2M Hill Julia Norman Mary McDaniel, McDaniel Lambert Ron Wldennuth John Collins, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion by Director Debay, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, with Director Pickier abstaining, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held March 20, 2000 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Report on Proiect Development Phase Issues: Development Information Memorandum No. 5, Ultraviolet Disinfection Senior engineer Greg Leslie introduced Bob Getter and Dave Murray of Brown and Caldwell who gave a presentation on design information memorandum (DIM) 5, Ultraviolet Disinfection. Dr. Leslie noted that the presentation gave information on Brown & Caldwell's efforts so far in obtaining the best ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system available for the GWR System. Issues that will be coming to Committee at a later date will be procurement of the UV equipment and obtaining certification of the equipment from the Department of Health Services. GWR System Minutes April 17, 2000 Page 2 of 4 It was noted that UV is a proven technology. Four experienced UV manufacturers have been identified and prequalification of vendors is recommended. Recommendations of in-vessel UV configuration and two options for lamp types were made. Director Anthony requested a UV schematic. Dr. Leslie responded that a schematic would be provided along with the Executive Summary of DIM #5. 2. Electrical Power Studies OCSD Project Manager Wendy Sevenandt introduced Mr. Jim Harris from OCSD, as the Power Study Project Manager for the electrical power studies. It was reported that proposals for the electrical power studies were received from three consultants. Staff ranked the proposals based upon technical merit and cost. The study includes two parts, 1) cost of power evaluation and 2) power co-generation study. The power co- generation project would require a supplement to the EIR. Both studies will be complete in about 90 days after issuance of a task order. Staff recommends that Black &Veatch be awarded a task order in an amount not to exceed $54,560. Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the Committee recommended issuance of a task order to Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed $54,560 for to complete the electrical power studies, composed of: 1) a cost of power evaluation and 2) a power co-generation study. 3. Financial Study Staff recommended that an independent financial study be sought to look at funding options and that a Request for Proposals and Scope of Work be prepared with a final review by the Committee. Upon motion by Director Debay, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee authorized preparation by staff of a proposal and scope of work for a financial study, cost estimate and recommendation(s) to complete the work and return to the Committee for final consideration. 4. Selection of Vice-Chair No Discussion. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, Director Eckenrode was selected as Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. GWR System Minutes ` Apri117, 2000 Page 3 of 4 5. Status Report Dr. Leslie reported on the following items: 1. Several things have occurred in the past month for the Bureau of Reclamation's Record of Decision to be issued and allow federal funding to be released: - The Final Availability of the EIS was published in the Federal Register on March 23, 2000 and after 30 days the Record of Decision could be issued. - Upon State review and concurrence with the Bureau of Reclamation, findings of no adverse effect to the historic properties as result of the GWR System construction, the EIS could be approved, which is necessary for the Record of Decision to be issued. - Staff was notified by Dennis Wolfe of the Bureau of Reclamation office in Temecula, CA that the Feasibility Study, a requirement to receive federal funds, also was approved. 2. The only monies received at this time have been $75,000 from the State Water Resources Control Board for the planning grant and approximately 75% of the research grant from the California Energy Commission. 3. OCWD Board of Directors will select their JCC alternate directors at their April 19, 2000 meeting. Mr. McIntyre reported that the OCSD Chair would select their alternates sometime this week. 4. Staff received a letter from the Regional Water Quality Control Board concerning discharges into the Santa Ana River during storm events and has directed us to submit an application for the discharge permit (NPDES). It will be a GWR System application, but it has not been determined who will hold the permit because of governance issues. It will require a future supplement to the EIR. A video was shown by Rick Davis of NCG Porter Novelli from a CBS newscast regarding "toilet to tap" from the DWP area of San Fernando Valley. Articles from the Los Angeles Daily News were also distributed. Mr. Davis noted that the focus of the public relations program would now be towards individual businesses and individual elected officials as most civic and city groups have been covered. Kellene Bum-Lucht of CDM reported that the following would come back to the Committee for their review in the next few months: 1. Results of the loading rate and efficiency of the microfiltration units with parameters and performance of the vendors in the Microfiltration Demonstration Project. 2. Groundwater modeling is completed using both steady-state and dynamic models with final locations of the wells. 3. Sizing for barrier pipeline from AWT to well sites. GWR System Minutes April 17,2000 Page 4 of 4 4. Report of optimization study of the GWR pipeline on the sizing of each of the reaches to Kraemer basin. Options will be brought back to the Committee. 6. Directors Comments Director Pickier reported that this would be Mr. McIntyre's last JCC meeting due to his retirement from OCSD and also would be Dr. Leslie's last meeting as he is leaving OCWD and returning to Australia. 7. General Managers Comments Mr. Mills reported that the $37 million funding from the State Water Bond for the GWR System would be received through SAWPA. SAWPA has worked out an agreement with the State Board whereby SAWPA will administer to local agencies, which will eliminate the need to return to the legislature for individual project approval and avoid dealing with State Board staff for approval of projects. The governor's budget this year has outlined $133 million to SAWPA to be spent over the next three years. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for May 15, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS n ngDm T°ad.°fDin s/z4M AGENDA REPORT roam Numha Rem Numx v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Andrei loan, Project Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING OF DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 241 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Actions regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41: a) Verbal report by Director of Engineering; b) Verbal report of General Counsel; c) Authorize Staff to receive and file written comments, if any, by the close of the review period, May 31, 2000; d) Open public hearing; e) Close public hearing; f) Discussion by Board; and g) Continue to July 19, 2000 Regular Board Meeting for consideration of the final EIR. SUMMARY At the April 26, 2000 Board Meeting, the Board of Directors established the public review period for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) between April 12, 2000 to May 31, 2000, with a public hearing on May 24, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. The Draft EIR provides the public with complete disclosure of the project environmental effects. The Draft EIR was mailed on April 12. 2000, to responsible agencies, organizations and individuals that expressed an interest in the project. A total of 130 draft EIR's were mailed. The public hearing was advertised in the Orange County Register. At the public hearing, Staff will present an overview of the project. K.S. Dunbar, our environmental consultant, will discuss the EIR and the CEQA process. All comments a«:.e: eaaae Page 1 received at the public hearing will be recorded and addressed in the Final EIR, along with written comments received during the review period. The Final EIR is scheduled for certification by the Board of Directors on July 19, 2000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A R Page 2 6 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In September 1999, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the project was circulated for public review. Staff contacted individual public agencies throughout Orange County by letter to inform them of the project. Written comments were received from several agencies expressing concerns. All verbal and written comments received were considered during the development of the Administrative Draft EIR. The Administrative Draft EIR was reviewed by Staff, and all comments were incorporated in the Draft EIR, which was submitted for public review on April 12, 2000. ALTERNATIVES None at this time. CEOA FINDINGS Board certification of the EIR is scheduled for July 19, 2000. ATTACHMENTS None Al:jak HAwp.@a�agenda\Board Agenda RepodsUWD Board Agenda Repods9 WDg1em 17.doc Ra,+ , aWea Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PMetlngDare To BA.ofW OS/29/gg AGENDA REPORT IMM uumEo- imm iefambr Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mark Tomko, Project Manager SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-46 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Actions regarding approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46: (a) Verbal report by Director of Engineering; (b) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-11, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46; Approving Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. SUMMARY The majority of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer replacement project is located in the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve and Nature Preserve. A Mitigated Negative Declaration addressing the environmental impacts and mitigation measures for the project was prepared and mailed to public agencies and other entities known to have an interest in the project. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared that describes the actions the District will take to minimize environmental impacts of the project. Staff recommends the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. R. � Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Back Bay Trunk Sewer consists of approximately 9,500 feet of 24-inch ductile iron pipe located in Newport Beach near Jamboree Boulevard, primarily in Back Bay Drive between the Newport Dunes Resort to a point that cuts through Big Canyon. In September 1998, the pipe experienced small leaks due to corrosion of a portion of the pipe, and approximately 300 feet of pipe was repaired. After further investigation, it was determined that the pipeline needed to be rehabilitated and/or replaced to maintain the structural integrity of the pipe. Tran Consulting Engineers was awarded the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to prepare the design and construction documents, and to assist the District in the process of obtaining the necessary permits from the governing agencies such as California Department of Fish and Game (Section 1601 Agreement); California Coastal Commission; City of Newport Beach; and the Orange County Department of Public Works. Mr. Kris Lindstrom, a consultant for the Orange County Sanitation District, prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration according to the CEQA requirements. The document was mailed to public agencies, and individuals or groups known to have an interest in the environmental issues in the area. Recipients were invited to submit their comments on or before May 15, 2000. Mr. Lindstrom reviewed all comments and the Mitigated Negative Declaration was revised to address all concerns. Mr. Lindstrom also developed a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that explains the actions the District will take to minimize environmental impacts. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS An Initial Study and Environmental Assessment indicate that there are only a few potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction. Mitigation measures have been proposed to minimize identified potential environmental impacts to an insignificant level. A list of mitigated measures is attached to the Negative Declaration. The list of mitigated measures will be made part of the project specifications. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was also prepared to implement the mitigation measures. Page 2 i V ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 00-11. MT:jak:jo \YadonWatal lwp.Ma\agendalBoard Agenda Reports@Ogg Board Agenda ReportiA MOWem IB.dot R-tee: oMa Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-11 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT: APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES: ADOPTING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT; APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES; ADOPTING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District ("District") is presently considering the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project, and WHEREAS, District is the Lead Agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, which is consistent with the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines, and District's CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, to assess the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project environmental impacts objectively, District prepared an Initial Study to assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; and, WSBS-BRH:p1:0`W15=:p120752 1 WHEREAS, the Initial Study resulted in a determination that there were less than significant impacts associated with the proposed project if certain mitigation measures were implemented, therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared; and, WHEREAS, District has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, as required by CEQA; and, WHEREAS, District has objectively evaluated, received, and filed comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, either in full or in summary, together with the District's responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review, have been included in the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, said Final Mitigated Negative Declaration has been presented to the members of the District's Board of Directors for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; and, WHEREAS, District has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, designed to ensure that the approved mitigation measures are implemented during project construction and operation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER: Section 1: That changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, before the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study were released for public review, which avoid or mitigate significant environmental effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, all identified in the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 2: That there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. Section 3: That the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects District's independent judgment and analysis. W585-BRKpi:05115M01120762 2 V Section 4: The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the District's decision is based are located at the Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, 92708. The Custodian of these documents and other materials is Mark Tomko, Project Manager. Section 5: That the proposed project alternative consists of the rehabilitation of a section of pipeline in Big Canyon (by use of a cured-in-place liner) and two new parallel pipelines in Back Bay Drive. The proposed alternative will create a number of potentially significant environmental effects that have been identified in the Initial Study and were taken into account in selecting the best alternative for achieving project objectives with minimal environmental impacts. Section 6: Potentially significant impacts identified in the Initial Study and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration that will be mitigated to less-than- significant levels by District are as follows: A. That construction in environmentally sensitive areas will take place between August 1, 2000 and February 15, 2001, to avoid the nesting season of certain birds, including the Least Bell's Vireo and California Light- Footed Clapper Rail. B. That the existing pipeline in Big Canyon will be rehabilitated in place by use of a liner, rather than replacing the pipeline to avoid disturbing sensitive habitat. C. That sewage spills will be avoided during construction by implementation of a Spill Prevention Plan. The Plan will include use of temporary by-pass pipelines, elevated risers, and stand-by emergency equipment, including a tank truck and pumps. D. That a Traffic Control Plan will be developed and included as part of the District's Standard Plans and Specifications. Emergency vehicle access will be provided via a locked gate accessible to all emergency service agencies. Automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the area will be temporarily prohibited to protect public safety and facilitate a more rapid completion of the project via fencing and detour signs. E. Temporary loss of use of a bicycle trail along the Back Bay Drive during construction will be mitigated by relocating the bicycle trail during construction on alternate routes. F. Temporary visual impacts during pipeline construction will be mitigated by minimizing construction time and post-construction restoration. WSBS-BRR:pl:0511 5/0 011 20 76 2 3 4 G. Temporary construction noise will be mitigated by limiting construction hours and informing the neighbors of construction activities. H. Air emissions from equipment and vehicles will be mitigated by continued compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. 1. Disruption of roadways and bikeways during construction will be mitigated through preparation of traffic control plans that maintain maximum safe traffic access. J. Disruption of utility service during excavation activities will be mitigated by coordinating with the Underground Service Alert and local utilities, developing plans for alternative services where needed, and re-routing of facilities where necessary and at District's expense if a utility purveyor has prior rights. K. Increased emergency response times during project construction will be mitigated by preparing traffic control plans prior to construction and by notifying emergency services before construction schedules are implemented. L. Any disturbance of drainage facilities during project construction and groundwater infiltration into open trenches and tunnels, will be mitigated by scheduling sewer construction during dry months, coordinating with the City of Newport Beach to protect underground facilities, and discharging groundwater pursuant to the sewer collection system rather than surface waters as allowed by District's NPDES Permit. M. Disturbance of cultural or paleontological resources during construction will be mitigated by halting work if unusual materials are found, and then consulting qualified professionals to examine the materials, record findings, and properly curate any significant artifacts discovered. N. Dust generation and air pollutant emissions from construction vehicles will be mitigated by using watering trucks, as necessary, to control dust and keep streets free of dust and dirt, covering trucks and dirt piles, using properly maintained construction equipment, and discontinuing construction during first and second stage smog alerts to the extent feasible. Section 7: That the Board of Directors adopts the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section B: That the Board of Directors adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. WSSS-8RH:pJ:O5115/OO:p120762 4 v Section 9: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary WSBS-8RH:pj.M15=11 W762 5 BOARD OF DIRECTORSnRs om To aa.aGr. o AGENDA REPORT r��9m� IbRR srzarooNumb 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-13, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, Amending Ordinances OCSD-05 and OCSD-06, and Replacing Ordinance No. OCSD-10. SUMMARY The FAHR Committee reviewed and recommended changes to the Ordinances governing sanitary sewer service charges at their May meeting. These changes are required to complete the April Board action to complete the consolidation of OCSD Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, to adjust the rates for Source Control Permit Users; and to correct the wastewater discharge parameters for nine categories of non- residential users. Because these charges are set by Ordinance, there is a two-step process to adoption. Tonight's action is the first reading and introduction. The second reading and adoption will take place at the June Board meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The combined effect of all of the recommended changes will be to reduce annual revenues by approximately $4.8 million. The reduction will be made up from "reserves." BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In 1997, the individual District Boards of Directors adopted multi-year Sewer Service User Fee Rates. These rate schedules were confirmed during the consolidation process through 2001-02. In April, the Directors voted to complete the consolidation by combining the books of account for the various Revenue Areas, except RA7 and RA14, and implementing a single sewer service charge. X MpOC� WAYMCY Rgv .&uN/peMa R�`d`WMn I.. R. v Page 1 r In order not to raise annual fees for any user above those previously adopted, the w appropriate rates for 2000-01 are those previously adopted by RA3. These rates are r based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year. (Rates for other types of users are based upon flow and strength average assumptions are set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-5, and are discussed below.) It is important to note that this action does not replace those higher rates that were adopted in 1997; they are only set aside until they become appropriate rates for that area. Setting aside, rather than rescinding these higher rates, will allow the District to implement them at a later date, if appropriate, without repeating the Proposition 218 notification and hearing process that was conducted when the rate structure was revised subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee process. Because of other governance and service issues that remain unresolved, the Board decided not to include Revenue Area 7 in this rate consolidation. Therefore, the 2000-01 rates for RA7 will be those that were previously adopted by District 7 and confirmed by the 1998 consolidation. The base rate, the single family-residential rate for 2000-01 will be $73 per year. In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates become based upon wastewater flow and strength per 1,000 square feet of development, rather than the same flat rate for all non-residential users. Since this rate structure was adopted, staff and consultants have been working together to refine the quantity assumptions for the various non-residential use types. We have also reviewed the user fee refund requests for accurate water use information. The results of these efforts are shown in the attached exhibit. Wastewater generation rates per 1,000 square feet are proposed to be decreased for financial buildings, office buildings, stand-alone stores, industrial parks, steel buildings and mini warehouses. These decreases would affect approximately 11,000 parcels. Shopping centers are proposed to be divided into three major categories based upon actual site visits. A low flow center would have a higher ratio of low end water users such as stores, big box retailers and offices. The flow rate for this category would be unchanged. An average flow shopping center would be a typical center with a well diversified mix of tenants. A high flow center would include those with high ratios of laundromats, grocery stores, restaurants, fitness centers, etc. Approximately 31% of the shopping centers will be classified in each of the low and average categories, while 38% will be categorized as high flow. General Counsel has ruled these changes do not require a Proposition 218 notice. These proposed changes would affect approximately 12,000 of the non-residential parcels in the District, or 35%. The net impact is a reduction of annual user fees of approximately $3.7 million, or approximately .5% of total user fees. They are also expected to reduce the refund requests to a trickle. H wM .ft��W M1p1,W NaKblMOeeu!Ai F�VGOaIMn 10. R« veove Page 2 General User Fees, those collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill, have t been adopted through 2001-02. The fees collected from Class I and Class 11 Permit users were not included in that action, nor are they included in the action described above. This action revises the rates (Flow, BOD, and SS) for these permit users so that they are consistent with the rates used for the general user. The proposed rates are based upon the single-family residential sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat Flow, BOD and SS follows: Domestic Revenue Area Flow Per MG 'BOD Per 1 000# SS per 10009 Equivalent 1,2 3 5 6 11, 13 219.31 180.45 172.65 78.00 7 205.26 168.88 161.58 73.00 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. OCSD-13 2. Impact of Revised Flow Recommendations H My MOH•R.00mriscwm,,.10Cx Re eruae Page 3 .y ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-05 RE: CONTINUING AND ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND AMENDING TABLE C OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-06 RE: CLASS I AND CLASS II INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGER PERMITTEE CHARGES FOR USE, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-10 The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. The District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-05, effective September 25, 1996, which established sanitary sewer service charges following Consolidation of former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California into the Orange County Sanitation District, a single consolidated entity. B. The Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-06, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-10, established charges for use by Class I and Class It Permittees for discharge of industrial waste, as authorized by law. C. That Ordinance No. OCSD-05 adopted a schedule of annual sewer services charges through Fiscal Year 2001-02 for all uses. D. That the basic single family residential rate is an accurate reflection of the cost to provide the service of wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. E. The maximum rates adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-05 for 1999- 00, were based upon the best available financial and operational data. Recent operational and financial data reaffirmed the basis for the establishment of the rates and methodology for the charges at the time of enactment of Ordnance No. OCSD-05, with certain exceptions for designated commercial and industrial users, as described in Paragraph F below. The 1999-00 rates are reaffirmed as the rate that does not exceed the actual cost to the District to provide the service, and shall continue to serve as the maximum rate until such time as it is determined that the cost of providing service exceeds those amounts which would require an amending Ordinance to be adopted in accordance with all requirements of law. 1 F. That records and data of operations confirm that the total discharge ➢ from convenience, neighborhood, and community shopping centers has intensified and is of greater volume and density than originally calculated at the time of adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, thus necessitating a change in the percentage of the single family residential rate upon which the users in these categories will be charged, in order to reflect a charge that is equal to the cost of providing the service. G. In furtherance of the adoption of a program to consolidate all Revenue Areas and all fees to a uniform amount, District has determined it is in the best interests of District and its users for the forthcoming year to use reserve funds designated for other purposes to meet necessary operational expenses, and to allow for setting of a lower rate for Fiscal Years 2000-01 and 2001-02. H. That charges for use adopted by this Ordinance revise the rates for each component factor(Flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD"), and Suspended Solids ("SS")) for Class I and Class 11 industrial waste permit users, in order to be consistent with the rates charged to non-industrial users. I. That Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05 and OCSD-06 made numerous findings of fact relative to the basis for the enactment of the annual sewer service charges for residential, industrial, and commercial properties and uses. J. That the findings set forth in Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05 and OCSD- 06 are reaffirmed, as applicable, and readopted herein. K. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and the California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN. Section 1: Ordinance No. OCSD-05 is hereby amended, as follows: 'Tables A and B of Ordinance No. OCSD-05 are hereby repealed and replaced by Tables A.1.00 and B.1.00, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference." Section 2: Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06 is hereby amended as follows: 2 V "TABLE C.1.00 Domestic Revenue Ama Flow Per MG SOD Per 1,0000 SS Per 1,000# E uivalem 1,2,3,5,6,11,13 219.31 1 180.45 172.65 75.00 7 205.26 1 168.88 161.58 73.00" Section 3: Ordinance No. OCSDA 0 is hereby repealed. Section 4: If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 5: The rates established by this Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 2000. Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two- thirds of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District at a regular meeting held June 28, 2000. Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff District Counsel 3 TABLE A.1.00 ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS Single Family Residential Rates 1998.89 1999-2000 200D-01 2001-02 Adapted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Revenue Area No. 1 $98.41 $110.04 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No.2 $74.00 $ T7.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No.3 $75.50 $ 77.00 $78.00 $00.00 Revenue Area No.5 $84.50 $ 96.75 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No.6 $79.00 $ 82.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No.7 $60.00 $ 66.00 $73.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 11 $80.00 $ 90.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 13 $100.00 $100.00 $78.00 $80.00 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District Multi-Family Residential Rates Per Unit 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Revenue Area No. 1 $67.49 $77.03 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No.2 $51.80 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No.3 $52.85 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 5 $59.15 $67.73 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No.6 $55.30 $57.40 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No.7 $42.00 $46.20 $51.10 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 11 $56.00 $63.00 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 13 $70.00 $70.00 $54.60 $56.00 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District 4 0 TABLE 8.1.00 ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 'Hold' Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption Add'm. 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse—Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse—Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 30% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 30% 109 Research and Development 30% 114 Industrial Park 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 5 TABLE B.1.00(Continued) Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 68 High Rise Office 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 89 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 - 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 97% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 97% 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 6 b TABLE B.1.00(Continued) Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery & Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stores 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 91 Regional Shopping Center 138% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 19 SFR with 1 or 2 Rental Units 170% 88 High Flow Shopping Center 226% Percentage of SFR Per 1,000 SF or Unit Assessor Use Effective Effective Effective Code Description FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 76 Restaurant—Take Out 148% 224% 300% 77 Restaurant—Coffee Shop 248% 424% 600% 78 Restaurant— Dinner House 248% 424% 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 248% 424% 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 313% 555% 796.% NOTE: Multiply the applicable percentage figure by the Table A.1.00 Single Family Residential Rate for the applicable Revenue Area, in order to determine the annual sewer service charge for the commercial or industrial user. 7 05/16/2000 5:21 PM Impact of CRTG Flow Recommendations Code Description Ong Flow CRTG Flow Ong % CRTG% Ong $ CRTG $ Increase Parcels MGD MGD To SFR To SFR $ 80.00 $ 80.00 (Decrease) 36 Financial Buildings 99 65 41% 27% $80,882 $53,264 ($27,618) 309 65,66.67,68,69 Otfce Buildings 198 100 82% 41% 3.894,846 1,947,423 (1,947.423) 4,354 94,95,96,97 Stores 99 55 41% 23% 592,792 332,542 (260,250) 2,666 107,108,109,114 Industrial Parks 253 75 100% 30% 5,531,341 1,659,402 (3,871,939) 3,330 112 Steel Buildings 25 10 17% 7% 17,974 7,401 (10,573) 149 113 Mini Warehouses 25 10 17% 7% 32,220 13,267 (18,953) 138 88 Low Flow Shop Ctr 79 79 53% 53% 409,123 409,123 0 333 89 Avg Flow Shop Ctr 79 200 53% 139% 441,704 1,239,281 797,577 327 90 High Flow Shop Ctr 79 325 53% 226% 475,914 2,144,759 1,668,845 420 Total $11,476,796 $7.806,462 ($3,670,334) 12,026 G?exce1.dtaV1n12101aUeed141tl d mpytSTRATPLNUIse Fee CRTG CRTG Cale FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT a f1 Third Quarter Ended March 31 , 2000 os � h 4 � •1 N XF Orange County Sanitation District, California Table of Contents " Section 1 - Overview........................................................................................................1 r Financial Report- Section 2 - Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge............................................................2 ., Comparison of Expenses by Department...................................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category.................................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item.................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process ...........................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends .............................................................................................9 r Section 3 -Capital Improvement Program Review r Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year..........2 r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life.............7 Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Area r Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas ........................................................1 Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2 .. Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review..........................................................................4 Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5 Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6 Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7 Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8 Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10 Section 5 - Self Insurance Budget Review General Liability Fund Budget Review .......................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review...........................................................2 r Operational Report Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1 r r r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report L L i � u . L 11 � r J This Page Left Intentionally Blank L L I : u L ii 4 II 111 I L. L L L u r Overview Third Ouarter Financial & Operational Report March 31,2000 r The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1999-00 third quarter ` comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1999-00 performance objectives as established in the 1999-00 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating& Working Capital Budget Review.At March 31, 2000, 74.57 r percent, or$32,810,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 3.50 percent, or$1,109,000 from the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2000 is $495.41 based on flows of 66.2 r billion gallons, or 240.83 million gallons per day. This is$13.17, or 2.73 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due to the shortfall in flows which are 3.7 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. This is offset slightly by net expenses being .57 percent, or$190,000 lower than budget through March 31. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 2000 include: • Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 77.33 percent of budget through the third quarter while staffing was 21 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 4.0 percent below the total 519 FTE's approved in the 1999- 00 budget. Personnel costs were higher than anticipated through the third quarter r due to (1) the distribution of annual bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter, (2)the early retirement and associated accrual leave payoff for several employees, (3) overtime costs associated with the Huntington Beach Closure Project, and (4)the distribution of annual leave payoffs. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be near budget by year-end. �+ • Retirement—Through the third quarter, costs for retirement were at 81.27 percent, or$1,575,400 of the $1,938,600 budget due to the fact that bonuses, benefit option plan payments, and leave payoffs are now subject to the Orange County Employees' Retirement System employer and employee contributions. This was not taken into consideration at the time the budget was submitted. r r Section 1 - Page 1 r L 1999-00 Third Quarter Report • Notices & Ads— Expenses for notices and ads were at $30,800, or 125.15 percent 6' of the $24,600 budget, due to searches to fill several vacant positions. • Lab Chemicals & Supplies—Through the third quarter, lab chemical and supplies costs totaled $348,800, or 104.42 percent of the $334,000 budget. These costs are high because of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the first quarter due to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. "r • Groundskeeping & Janitorial—Groundskeeping and janitorial costs totaled $270,900, or 103.38 percent of budget through March 31, due to unanticipated costs of $44,700 in tree pruning, $41,400 in weed abatement, and $10,600 in repair of — asphalt at Plant Number 2. L • Solids Removal — During the third quarter, Kern County implemented a road tax, and Tule Ranch increased rates by $2 per wet ton. Consequently, costs for solids 6W removal are at 85.36 percent of the $4,293,500 budget through March 31. • Outside Lab Services—Through March 31, costs for outside lab services totaled , $140,900, or 94.76 percent of the $148,700 budget. These costs are high because of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the first quarter due to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. L • Professional Services—Audit &Accounting—Through the third quarter, audit and accounting expenses of$45,100 are at 96.37 percent of the $46,800 budget due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and second quarters of each year. r • Research —At March 31, research costs of$337,500 are only at 51.49 percent of the $655,500 budget due to the cancellation of a$40,000 W ERF grant project and to the timing of when annual fees for participation in research organizations are 6' paid. The majority of these fees are paid in the fourth quarter of each year. • Service Maintenance Agreements— Expenses of $511,400, or 28.08 percent of the service maintenance agreement budget of$1,821,300, are low due to the timing of when these agreements are renewed. Staff expects to approximate budget by year- end. • Diesel for Generators—Through March 31, diesel costs for running generators L equal the amount budgeted for the year of$10,000. This is due to the use of diesel fuel for pumps at the beach during the Huntington Beach Closure Project. • Natural Gas—At March 31, natural gas expense totaled $959,500, or 92.93 percent of the $1,032,500 budget, primarily as a result of an increase in the cost per unit of usage since the budget was adopted. V Section 1 - Page 2 u Overview • Other Non-operating Expense —At March 31, other non-operating expenses of $50,100 was at 105.65 percent of the $47,400 budget. This overage is due to costs of $14,000 incurred during the third quarter for an expert panel review of the Huntington Beach Closure issue. Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) s Last Five Years 550 r 501.00 502.13 093.65 403.65 4bb.41 500 461.1 p6.56 � 465.]5 _ 1 450 4011-' 350 ' oc.oF 9aSZ e]-Ga OA.00 o0.nn 3rd Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Annual 01, end Otr end at, end Otr end Orr audcet As demonstrated in the graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the third quarter has been within three percent of the year-end actual for the past four years. The cost comparison for 1999-00 is consistent with this trend as staff projects the year-end cost per million gallons to approximate $492.25. This projected amount exceeds budget by two percent due to lower than anticipated flows. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter, as budgeted for 1999-00, and as actually incurred through the third quarter of 1998-99. All three charts are quite similar showing little change among the current year third quarter actual, current year budget, and prior year third quarter actual. Section 1 - Page 3 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report I More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 r provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third quarter for the last five years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for March 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000; Section 2 — Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2— pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line r item through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, Y° actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Capital Outlay Review. as r S700,000,000 S90,000,000 $80.000,000 r 570,000,000 — Sao,DOD,a00 r $so,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 L, $20,000,000 $10,000,000 so itt Na 03/31/00 Actual Projected 1999-00 Originally Estimated Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 1999-00 Capital $41,691,800 $60,853,400 Outlay- $92,401,500 ♦m As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $41,691,800, or 45.12 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1999-00 as of March 31, " 2000. Costs are low through the third quarter as many projects for 1999-00 are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are expected to be $60.9 million or 65.9 percent of budget at year-end. Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital r expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay requirements incurred through March 31. For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 6 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 7 through 11 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. r Section 1 - Page 4 r Overview `+ Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At March 31, 2000, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $90.67 million, or 65.08 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at$32.86 million, are at 68.38 percent of budget, or $22.5 million, and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas, budgeted at$74.3 million, is at 67.24 percent of budget, or$49.96 million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. Interest revenues, budgeted at $26.78 million, are only at $12.88 million, or 48.11 percent, due to lower than expected interest rates on investments and the impact of"marking to market" in this environment. Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at$5.2 million, are at 103.3 percent, or$5.4 million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $141.37 million, or 75.42 percent of budget through March 31, 2000. The costs related to capital improvement projects (share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction) are only at $41.69 million, or 45.12 percent of budget, because many projects are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays, as was previously explained in r the Capital Outlay Section. Conversely, revenue area operating and other expenses, budgeted at $9.4 million, are r at 314.0 percent of budget, or$29.4 million, due to the one-time write-off of Orange County Investment Pool losses of $22,782,400. COP/Bond Retirement and Interest expense, budgeted at $41.7 million, are high at $37.5 million, or 89.9 percent of budget, because the majority of principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of the fiscal year. Self-Insurance Budget Reviews:The District is self-insured for Workers' Compensation and for General Liability claims in excess of $25 million. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. r The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $725,200, or 63.9 percent of budget, at March 31, while total expenses were $1,203,500, or 107.3 percent of budget due to higher than anticipated claim payments and the one-time write-off of Orange County Investment Pool losses of$212,300. .. operational Review:The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of March 31, 2000. r r Section 1 - Page 5 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and � incorporated into the 1999-00 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 1999-00, workplans were also developed at the Division level. At March 31, 2000, 75 percent of the District's performance objectives and 63 percent - of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. u 4,1 V u u L i �i u w Section 1 - Page 6 - v' ass J.O. & W. C. Budget Review r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 O&M r Engineerng 56% -1% GSA r 10% Finance 5% r Comm. 1% ass Into.Tech 6% Exec,Mgmt. Tech.Svcs. HIR 2% 17% 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges 1999-00 Budget r Engineering 0% O 8 M 569e see GSA i(Ylx sr Finance 6% Comm 1% r Into.Tech. 5% Exec.Mgmt r 3% Tech.Svc,. HIR 17% 2% r Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999 Engineerng r 1% OSM GSA 59% 10% r Finance 6% r Comm. 1% Into.Tech. 4% r Exec.Mgmt. 2% Tech.Svc,. HIR 15% 2% Section 2— Page 1 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Nine Months Ended March 31, L 03131/96 W131197 03131/98 ON31199 1999-00 0131= V Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow In Million Gallons 65,075.42- 67.13e 69,582,72 66,521.09 91,240.89 88.22800 1-I Flow In Mllllon Gellona oar Dev 237 W 246.03 253.95 242.76 2W.00 240.83 Yal General Manager's Department $ 848 a 11.55 8 9.59 It 9.33 S 13.08 $ 12.18 Communications 5.41 0,16 5.33 5.10 6.27 6.61 1 Human Resources Department 6.29 11.61 10.76 9.03 9.44 10.16 v Finance Department Finance Administration 20.09 18.52 18.23 14.71 18.29 111.44 Accounting 9.29 10.25 10.01 10.87 8.24 Ilse Purchsaing&Warehousing 647 6.78 5.46 6.56 6.91 8.93 Total 35.85 35.55 31.70 32.13 31.44 30.25 General Services Department I j General Services Administration 5.61 6.38 4.35 4.64 3.31 3.89 I� Collection Facilities Maintenance 1.68 1.38 1.80 5.07 3.82 7.78 Plerd Fatllfties Meammance 35.34 38.38 35.96 45.89 43.93 41.69 Total 43.61 48.12 4211 55.80 51.06 53.W Information Technology Department 1.T.Administration - 1.91 6.19 7.51 - Customer&Network Support 15.34 10.69 14.00 8.72 11.76 17.91 j Programing&Database - 2.94 3.10 5.65 1a1 Process Cbl Integration 3.33 &82 4.92 3.89 0.97 Total 1534 14.02 17.82 18.49 24.76 32.04 operations&Maintenance Department list Opns&Maim. Administration 2.82 1.95 l38 2.08 3.33 2.60 O&M Process Engineering 7.95 7.99 6.92 4.17 6.17 9.39 Plant No.No. 1 Operations 79.43 75.85 67.95 72.27 63.62 72.88 Plant No.2 Operations 124.16 100.93 93.84 98.21 94.91 103.55 �( Mechanics]Maintenance 54.04 45.59 49.04 60.59 48.06 48.46 Electrical&Instrumenta l=Maintenance 41.57 41.74 40.62 47.62 49.42 47.33 } Mr Quality&Special Projects 0.22 4.14 6.55 6.13 28.82 11.28 Ild! Central Generation 24.06 25.78 28.55 27.65 7.46 20.23 Total 340.55 203.97 303.86 308.72 300.58 324.71 Technical services Department V Technical Services Administration 5.53 6.56 7.36 7.11 7.29 Ve Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 40.18 41.39 35.86 31.14 40.76 42.41 Emironmemal Sciences Laboratory 37.10 31.03 30.35 31.37 34.49 38.97 Source Control 3.41 4.13 4.88 2.70 2.75 (1.18) LI Solely&Emergency Response 2.76 5.12 3.93 3.60 6.53 also Total 89.28 55.23 83.37 75.92 91.82 8212 _ Engineering Department Engineering Administration 0.02 0.01 - 0.20 0.05 (0.99) 'w1 Planning B Design 1.10 1.06 1.21 0.60 0.03 (1.64) Construction Management 0.49 1.20 4.19 1.07 (6.06) Total 1.12 1.58 2.41 4.90 2.08 (7.88) I Total Joint Operating Expenses 50.93 518 L .99 508.95 519.31 630.41 553.45 Less: Revenues (44.13) (37.82) (5880) (4276) (48.17) (58.04) - NO Joint Operating Expenses $ 501.80 a 481.17 S 450.15 $ 476.88 9 482.24 $ 495.41 60 hs Section 2-Page 2 U J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999-00 r (IMM8 03131199 year to Data Budge% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 0I131/00 Real'vetl General Managefs Daparhnent $ 667,489 $ 620,562 $ 1275,300 $ 8D6,833 63.27% „ry Communifatlons 371,178 339,032 481,000 430,840 8&57% Human Resources DeparNrent 748.481 501,007 881,700 673.104 78.11% Finance Department Finance Administration 1.129,348 978,585 1.486,500 558,797 37.59% Accounting 696,197 722,793 751,700 852.958 113,17% Purchasing&Warehousing 380.197 435.859 630,400 591.396 93.81% Total 2,205,742 2.137,237 2,868,600 2,003.151 6983% r General Services Depamnent General Services Administraion 302,408 308,582 301.900 257,854 85.34% Collection Facilities Maintenance 125.170 337257 348,400 515.152 147.86% Plant Facilities Maintenance 2,502,271 3,052,546 41,008,911 2,761.123 66.87% r Total 2,929,849 3,698,385 4,659200 3,533,929 75.85% Information Technology Department I.T.Administration - 126.963 565,000 497,104 87.96% r Customer&Network Support 974.195 5a0,134 1,075,OD0 1.186252 110.35% Programing&Database - 196247 282,400 374292 132.54% Process CM Integration 265.512 327550 336,400 64,408 19.15% r Total 1239,707 1229,894 2,268,800 2,122,056 93.95% Operations&Maintenance Depannumt Dons&Maim Adminisnetiun 165,639 138257 303,750 171,952 55.61% O&M Process Engineering 481,502 277,191 562,550 621.802 110.53% Plant No.l Operations 4,728,187 4,807,491 5,804,800 4,826,374 83.14% Plant No.2 Operations 6,530,107 6.534268 8,659.300 6.858,676 792D% Mechanical Maintenance 3,412,608 3,366.660 4,467,300 3208,488 71.98% s Ekrkical&Instrumentation Mtce. 3,383,044 3,167.873 4.509.100 3,134,313 69.51% Air Quality&Special Projects 455.825 407,656 2.446,700 746,828 30.62% Central Generation 1,987,054 1,839236 680,900 1.935,981 284,33% Total 21,143,974 20,537.532 27,424,400 21.504.313 78.41% Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 511.118 472.715 665,DD0 211,016 31.73% Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 2.564,947 2,071.193 3,719,30D 2,810,905 75.68% r Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,111,587 2.086,463 3,147,300 2.574.594 81.80% Source Control 339.453 179.745 250.700 (78,141) .(31.17%) So"&Emergency Response 273210 239.761 695,600 582A43 9T87% Total 5,800,315 5.049,877 8,377,000 6,101217 72.83% r Engineering Deparlmem Engineering Administration 101 13278 5,600 (65276) (116584%) Planning&Design 84.425 39,633 3,100 (121.889) (3931.90%) r Construetton Management 83.472 278476 179,500 (334286) (18623%) Total 167,998 331587 188.200 (521,451) (2T7.07%) Total Joint Operating Expenses 35274.733 34,545,103 48.395,000 35.653.992 75.74% Less:Revenues (3,952,169) (2,843.734) (4,395,000) (3,843,725) 87.46% Net Joint Operating Fspenses $ 31.322.554 S 31.701,369 $ 44,000,000 $ 32.810267 74.67% r Section 2-Page 3 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report J Summary of Expenses by Major Category For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 L Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent i Budget 7hru 7hru (Deaease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining 4>J Description 1999-W 03/31/00 03/31/99 $ % Realbed Bud9ei Salary,Wages&Benefits $37,655,800 $29.117,697 $28,943,230 $ 174,467 0.60% 77.33% $ 8.538.103 j ldninismerve Expenses BD4,10D 467.527 520,209 (52.682) -10.13% 58.14% 336,573 Y.1 Pinning&Publicetlon 393,300 246,9W 245,755 1.205 0.49% 62.790/6 146,340 `I Training&Meetings 991,000 552,471 387,345 165,126 4263% 55.75% 438,529 - I Operating Expenses 4,887,200 3.847.241 3.569,133 279,108 7.8r/a 78.72% 1,039,959 69 Contractual Services 6,822,700 5.241,375 4,290,614 950,761 22-16% 76.82°.5 1,581,325 V Professional Services 2,420,900 1.374,906 941,802 433.094 45.99% 56.79% 1,046,0D4 Research&Moinaring 2,428,SDD 1,574,142 1,301,076 273,068 20.99% 64.82% 854458 Repairs&Maimerwxe 5.630,400 3.383,681 3.079,221 304,460 9.89% 60.10% Z246,719 _ Utilaies 3,58QDD0 z717.9/8 2512,370 295.608 8.18% 75.92% 85ZO22 W Other Materials,Supplies, _ and Senics 2,513,600 1.341.881 1.389,516 (Z7,635) -2.02% SUM 1,171,719 L Net Cast Alocetion (19,73ZWM (13,211.857) (12.614,168) (697,609) 4.74% 66.0% (6.520743) Total Jam Operating Expose 48,395,000 36,653,992 34,545,103 Z108,889 6109A 75.74% 11,741,008 J Revenues&Offsets (4,395,000) (3,843,725) (Z843.734) (999.991) 35.16% 97.46% (551,275) I Net Jam Operating Expense $44,000.000 U$3Z810,26% $31.701.389 It 1,108,898 3.5D% 74.57% $11,189.733 Gallonage Flow(MG) 91,240.89 66,228.00 66,521.09 (293) -0.44% � i Galloage Rm(MGD) 250.00 240.83 24278 (1.95) -0.80% f..l Gallonage Flaw($*s(MG) $ 48224 $ 495A1 $ 476.56 $ 18.85 3.96% L J u V L Section 2—Page 4 61 J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 r Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase 1111 Thor Thru Rennnng thru (Decree) (Dacha e) Description 1999M ON31100 03131100 B-kit 03r3V99 $ % r Inter District Sewer Use $1,500,000 $1,853,199 123.55% $ (353,199) $ 935,368 $ 917,831 96.13% Wastehauler 425.000 302546 71.19% 122,454 327,973 (25,427) -7.75% Sludge Disposal 900.000 613,450 68.16% 286,550 511.625 101,825 19.9D% Scrap Sales 25,000 3239 12,96% 21,761 67 3,172 4734.33% Other Sales 200.000 11.796 5.90% 198.204 7.736 4,060 52.48% Rents&Leases 120,000 121,659 101.38% (1,659) 119.156 2,503 2.10% .+ General Non-Operating 50,000 63,237 126.47% (13.237) 33,928 29.309 86.39% Vehicle&Equipment 300,000 226,860 75.62% 73,140 223.695 3,165 1.41% r PoM rSales 550,DD0 391 72.55% 150,957 439.724 (40.681) -9.25% Sampling Charges 325,000 248,696 76.52% 76.304 244,462 4234 1.73% Total Joint Operating Revenues $4,395.000 $3,843,725 87.46% $ 551275 $2.843.734 $ 999.991 35.16% Section 2-Page 5 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 V Expense %Expanse Expo o Inveaee Irnaease V✓ Budget muu This Reasinillg Thm (osasae) (Qeaease) Deeolptlen 199►00 0713110) 03131100 Budgt 03131M 9 % . . Selerimt w4m.8 Bdft u selalesa 1111s9se 9 M.123,300 $ 24,B%,248 77.38% $ 7.255,052 9 24.388.831 8 489,417 1.82% Enpblee BaneBlc 1 Raft a 1,9mem 1,575.422 81.27% 353,173 2,009,737 (434.315) -21.61% bell Gmp lmaarsm 3,177,000 Z337.885 73.511% 838704 2,255,5W M,388 320% Tutxn RamWeanrt - 58,1W WA (SQ19r) 62,550 (6,362) -1Q17% Unlfann Remel 67,200 50,301 74.85% lemg 482134 Z007 4.35% J Wakes Canpc setim 237,40D 232,500 97.94% 4,90D 164,249 6a.mi 41,55% Unanpb/ns reu. 11Z30D 7.133 8.35% 105,187 4,142 2,991 7221% Total Bmnelits 5,63ZSOD 4,250,,449 78.99% 1,273051 4,554.399 (2941950) 448% LI Maas,Wage:,B Benefits 37,W5,800 29,117.1197 77.33% 8,538t® 26,943230 174,467 Q80% 861er1a1a supWl�85aNr® U Albninlebetiva Expenses MenhoreWps 182,100 131.143 7202% SQ957 109,393 21,750 11i Office Exp-Supplies 155,200 90,093 SSAS% 6511W 113,389 (23,293) -20.59% OIAca use-dna 109,000 57,412 5267% 51,588 69.105 (11,693) -1alli ski ConWer Senn 250.001) 134,301 9.72% 115,699 2 ,123 (Ml= -34.53% Slim Fumtiee,Fatam,etc 107,80) U.578 9363% 53.222 23,199 31.379 1352616 Mntin9 8 Publiceffm iu Repalnllaso 285= 181,326 63.56% 103874 188,448 (5,122) -ZM% PnirEn9Oulatls 73,3m 30.768 41.13% 4Z534 35.923 (5,157) -143 ' I Nokms BAEs 24,6M 30,788 125.15% MISS) 17,134 13.654 7918% M Phdo Rscae m 1Q20B 4,W0 40.00% 8,12D 6250 (2,170) 3472% Training B llbe6ngs Mari M6,OOD IS2,873 64AD% 83,077 142091 10,832 T6M Y4 Tmrv, 755.000 399,518 5292% MSS 245.254 154,2114 6291% OpaAing ExOases C moe Csd}leis 1,307,300 M032 7435% 335,268 9 .nil 48,811 SW% 6J Suffice CaNd 1,255,8M 1,m1,254 62a2% 214,5% 9I5.M 125,475 1370% Odx Cand 1,424,2M 1,051,4W 74.53% 36279i 1,057,101 3.555 Q34% Claucais-Cagen.Oper. 29,700 S,W4 17.08% 24,626 7.0a7 (ZM3) -2851% U MareOama Clericals 28.300 72. 0 79.17% 5,895 4277 18,127 42389% Gmdim.Deed B Oil 158,600 136,556 85.10% Z{OM 185,ST2 (40.016) -2841% Tole 172,33C) 113.734 65.82% MOOS 65.923 47.811 7253% I SW.Pair .BJan Supplies 41,600 31.478 75.W% 1Q1M Is4 (14,974) -224% �e l Chadcals B Supplies 334.000 30.8,771 104.42% (14,TTi) Z .%l 113,620 4844% W Omeei,suppiks 134,9M 114,519 84.89% Man 125,027 (10,5m) 440% 1 (Camruaf) ii M Section 2—Page 6 L' J.O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line than r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 r Ermmna %Fxpe. Expose Increase Increase Budget Thru Thru Remaining Thru (Decrere) (Dsenae) t a4ription 1098419 801311110 037311N Budget 03131199 $ % r Confinuad contractual swim 3,Ids Removal 4,293,500 3,09003 85.38% (128,597 3.031,9W 832,971 20.N% Other Waite Disposal 490,70D 318264 84.88% 172,436 Me29 (17.365) 3.17% r GreurdsheepingB newlel 282,000 270.857 103,38% (8,857) 147,789 123,068 83.27% Ou ude tab Servlas la rm 140,902 94.76% 7,798 512W 89,852 174.93% Oxygen Rent Open 331.5W 210,116 0.38% 121,384 206,551 3,565 1.73% Weer 1,296,,300 638.333 49.09% 869,907 517,483 11%670 22.97% Roiasharel ser nim 19981 390,000 302,737 n1m 87,283 234,170 WN7 29.20% Audit s Acaun6ng aa00 45.100 08.37% 1,700 46.765 (1,665) 4.68% r Engineering 440,500 262,242 69.53% 178,258 111.700 1%642 134.77% Wren 1.543,800 784817 49.55% 778,783 549.197 215,650 392M Raeuv ch a Monitoring 6Mronmenal Monitoring 1,678,100 1,236.657 TJ.89% "1."3 970,637 258,120 25.30% r Air Quality MmibRg 95,000 - 0.00% 96.000 16,477 (16.477) -100.00% Research 955,500 337,485 51.49% 318,015 306.062 31,423 10.27% Relative sI alnlerence wl Matedab B Smviae 3,809,100 2.872,329 75.41% 936,1`71 2,50D,638 371,691 14.58% Sic Mb.Agremants 1.821,300 511,382 28.D8% 1,309,948 578.583 (67231) -11.82% U0e0a Teiephme 249,200 1588N 62.96% 92,310 151,528 5864 3.54% v� Desel For Generam 10,000 10,311 109.11% (311) - 10.311 WA Nature[Gue 1,032,50D NSA85 92.93% 73,015 738,320 221,165 29,98% Power 1,411,400 1.011.546 71.67% 399.854 1.014,042 (2,496) -0.25% Water 876,90D 679,746 66.11% 297.154 608,462 (28.735) 4.72% r od r Operating SuppON Oubide Equip Renal 179,800 99,490 55.40% 80110 M783 3.707 3.87% District Equip Rental 319,400 228,682 70.97% 92,718 222,011 4.671 2.10% r Iaureae 1,1511,1100 719266 80.54% U18,734 791,320 (72,054) .9.11% Freight 58,600 41.708 73.e9% 14.892 41.701 7 0.02% Mbc.Operating Expense 185,000 100.840 59.37% 75.160 113.710 (3,870) 3.40% AOa1D Operaling Fees 142,0DO 94,617 66.77% 47,183 86.093 8,724 10.13% r General Mama" Contingency 129,900 - 0.0D% 129,900 - - WA Ricryearreapplop8etia 265,700 - 0.0D% 285,700 - - WA Other Non4)par Expense 47.400 50078 105.65% (2,678) ie'aw 31,180 164.99% MeN,supp,a serv. 30,471,800 20,748,152 68.09% 9,723.848 ISZ6,,041 2,532,111 13.90% TOM J.O.Regninraenia 88,127,800 49,865.849 73.19% 18,251.751 47.159271 2.706,578 5.74% Not Cost A[loca8en (19,732,e00) (13,21I.W7) W.95% (8,520,743) (12.014.168) (597.689) 4.74% r Net J.O.Rpuireania 48,395,000 30,853.992 7524% 11.741,008 34845,103 2,108,8119 8.10% Lase: Revenue (4.395.000) (3,e43,725) 87.46% (551.275) (3,843,734) (909,991) WAS% r Net J.O.Expendeuree $ 44,000,000 $ 32,810,257 74.57% $ 11,189,733 $ 31,701,389 $ 1.108,698 3,50% r Section 2-Page 7 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process Lj For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 I v Increase Increase Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 03/31/00 03/31/99 $ % Treatment Process: v Preliminary Treatment $ 3,893,142 $ 3,300,270 $ 592,872 17.96% -- � I Primary Treatment 3,573,913 3,727,936 (154,023) -0.13% Secondary Treatment 2,532,670 3,105,231 (572,561) -18.44% 1 I Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 440,148 270.667 189,491 62.62% L1 E10uent Disposal 476,707 444,573 32,134 7.23% Solids Handling 15,051,067 10.950,977 4,100,090 37.44% U Cogeneration 3,133,581 3,000,519 133,062 4.43% Utilities 568,490 826,886 (258,396) -31.25% Electrical Distribution 461,142 473.001 (11,859) -2.51% _ . Miscellaneous Buildings 3,378,997 4,811,145 (1,432,148) -29.77% fV Air Quality 758,314 736,652 21,662 2.94% 1w Laboratory 2,385.821 2,897,257 (511,436) -17.65% Total Joint Operating Requirements 36,653,992 34,545,104 2.108,888 6.10% V Less: Revenues (3,843,725) (2,843,734) (999.991) WAS% I ( Net Joint Operating Expenditures $ 32,810,267 $ 31,701,370 $ 1,108,897 3.50% J V u L Section 2—Page 8 I L - - — - - - - - - CIP Review Capital Improvement Program — FY 1999-00 For the Nine Months Ended March 31. 2000 Plant 1 Collection Projects S5,12],m0 S13A52.003 12 320 Plant 2 56.123]02 1V. Equipment Items 51A]2.584 4'. Special Projects Interplant 8 Joint S3.487,408 Facilities 64: S12,029.042 29°° Total Capital Improvement Expenditure- S41.691.809 Revenue Revenue Revenue Area] Area 53.6W.056 Area 11 Revenue Revenue S3.359,768 Area 13 51.480.522 9% Area 5 4°a 8'° $336,054 Revenue 51.963.159 1'e Area 14 5°° 59fi3.241 2 Revenue Area 1 $3,152.387 8% Revenue Area 2 S9.639.523 23°. Revenue Area 3 S17.110.099 40% Total Capital Improvement Funding - S41.691.809 Section 3— Page 1 1999-00 Third Quarter Report u' Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 V 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected u Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay Collection System Improvement Projects Revenue Area 1 a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1.17 $ 17.000 $ 20,593 $ (3,693) S 24.650 N b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 15,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 32,000 20,593 11,407 24,551) Revenue Area 2 a Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment 3 Protection,241 423,800 381.583 42,217 390.917 b Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210.600 23.544 167.055 51,722 c Atwood Subbunk Improvements,2-50 214.000 18.522 195.478 45,665 d Eucid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,256,000 730.017 525.983 934,637 e Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump San.Abandonment,2-24-1 1,253.300 9,651 1,243,649 15,644 Sri f Euclid Relief Improvements-Reach"A",2-52 1.700 8,138 (6,438) a,138 a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 47.700 12,300 47,700 It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 80.400 - 80,400 5,000 4 1 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2-21-1 263,000 8,366 255.234 24,269 j Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 63.800 13.484 50,316 16,855 Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 3.827.200 1,241.005 2.586.195 1,540,547 Revenue Area 3 1 . a Miller-Folder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,3-38-1 4,825.900 3.355.394 1,470.506 5,082,T79 b Moils.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave.,3-9-1 76,000 5,517 70,483 5,517 c Seel Beach Blvd. Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3.11R 219,500 389,746 (170,246) 389,746 I d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,3-35R 3.437,600 4,555,646 (1,118,246) 7,633,891 Irsl e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 81,209 (21,209) 239.294 I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 89,400 16.878 70,522 23,697 9 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101.900 - 101,900 5,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3 8,810,300 8.406,590 403.710 13,379,824 Revenue Area 5 I Ralooatkm of Lido Pump Station,641A 332.600 490.804 (168,204) 490,804 b Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer,546 950,400 173,359 777,041 208,972 I c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 120,362 (60,352) 120,352 yl d Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 80,500 80,500 20,000 e Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,500 37,756 140,744 47,194 -- f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 13,400 - 13,400 2,500 I Sub-Total-Revenue Areas 1,615,400 822,271 793,129 889,822 Lu Revenue Area 6 a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 $68,900 233,763 625,137 233,763 ..I b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 193.795 (178,795) 193,795 c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 38,200 6.091 30,109 10,113 6.1 d Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 10,700 10,700 2,500 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 6 922,800 435,649 487.151 440,171 1 Revenue Area 7 u a Rehabilitation of Gullying Pump Stations,2-37 208,300 44,497 163,803 55,822 b Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,600 38,884 165.716 63,986 c Tustin Airbase-Armstrong SubWnk Sewer,7.27 140,900 89,813 51.087 125 358 I d Gisler-RedhillTrvnkftelocaton,7-32 129,900 4.897 125.003 4,897 L . e Orange Trunk Improvements,7-39 55.200 19.830 35,370 29,100 f Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach"A•,7-36 366,800 19,469 346,331 28.578 - 9 RA-6"B"Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7-28 367,700 255,741 101.959 255,741 h Gisler-Redhill/Nanh Trunk Improvements,741 350,700 27,053 323,637 36,129 I.I i Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 220.878 (160.878) 220,878 I Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7.21 188,600 34.692 153,908 39.551 k Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 78.100 - 78.100 5,000 1 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 16.100 16,100 5,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 2,155,900 755.764 1,400,136 870,840 Isrl Section 3-Page 2 II CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year we For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 1999430 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 Estimafad Actual at Remaining Projocted wa Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay Revenue Area 11 a Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment,11-23 446,200 144,677 301,523 146,677 r b Goldenwest Trunk Sewer Replacement,11-17-3 2,579,300 239,583 2,339,717 2,454.971 c Hell Avenue Interceptor,11-20 2,565,800 114,371 2,451,429 502,050 d Warner Avenue Relief Sawer,11-22 446,000 26,464 419,536 26.464 e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 984.126 (924,126) 984.126 r f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 57.400 12,136 45,264 15,170 g Pumpatation SCADA Communications Study 78.100 - 78,100 2,500 It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 26,800 25,800 5,000 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 11 6,259,600 1,521,357 4.738,243 4,134,958 .r Revenue Area 14 a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 6.000 248,774 (242,774) 248,774 Sub-Total-Revenue Area 14 6,000 248.774 (242.774) 248.774 r Total Collection System Improvement Projects 23,629,200 13,452,003 10,177,197 21,529,486 r Treatment&Disposal Prole Reclamation Plant No.1 1. Preliminary Treatment a Headwarks No.2 Pump IMP.&Overhaul 2002M - 200,200 200,200 r b Sunflower P.S.Drive Replacement,P1-62 389,BW 36,952 353.838 75,052 c Grit Chamber Modifications,P"9 107,800 100 107,700 100 2. Primary Treatment r a Primary TMatment 72 MGD Expansion,PI37 2,440,000 1.479.621 980.379 1,679,503 b Primary Effluent Pumping Automation 171,800 24.289 147.611 25,000 3. Secondary Treatment a Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,Pl-36-2 687,200 289,838 397,362 380,451 ma b Rehabilitate Four Trickling Filters,Pt-76 10,600 8,601 1,899 8,601 c Five Trickling Fiiter Clarifiers,Pi-77 10,500 91 10,409 91 4. Solids Handling&Digestion a Meehanicel Seals on High Rate Digester Mu,SP-30 425,000 93,641 331,359 100,000 r Is Dewaleang Bak Press Rebuild 173,800 145,573 28,222 150.000 5. Utility Systems a Chemical Facility Modkns,P146.2 2,531,600 1,766,481 765,110 2,231.411 b Electl.Facility Modkns&Safety Upgrades,P140-1 57,100 12.229 44,871 190,492 Transfer to Project Below (12,600) - (12,600) - Alarm Beacons for Venting of Gas Holder 12.500 30 12,470 12.400 6. Safety&Security Improvements a Seismic Retum of Four Structures, P144-4 934.700 813,641 121,159 813,541 7. Miscellaneous&Support Projects a Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-PI 1,000,000 402,005 597.995 705,728 Sub-Totrl -Reclamation Plant 1 9,140,000 5,072.007 4,067,993 6,572,570 r Treatment Plant No.2 1. Preliminary Treatment a Headworks PUMP IMPrvmt&overhaul,SP-32 216.500 88.549 127,951 100,000 r b Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,000 19,957 189.043 175,000 c Headworka Improvements @ Plant 2,P2.66 527.400 44,973 482,427 106,046 Transfer to Project Below - - - Replacement of Barscreen Influent Gate,P2.63 - - - aw 2. Primary Treatment a Rehab D&E Clarifler SWeeP Arms 88,200 - 68.200 68,200 m4 Section 3-Page 3 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year i For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 V 1999-00 1999-00 199"0 1999-00 I� _i Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Irrl Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay 3. Secondary Treatment a DA.F.Support Rail Replacement 65,000 - 65.000 65,000 4. Solids Handling&De,,nia ing LJ a Dewalering Batt Press Rebuild,SP-37 252.300 192,802 59,498 260,W0 b Sludge Grinder ReplacemenVRehab,SP-36 55.600 7.440 48,060 10,000 G Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 6.441,200 3.015,105 3,426,094 4,011,042 of G1,G-2 Conveyor Bait Rehab 41.800 - 41,800 41,800 61 e Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P260 4,481,500 199,145 4,282,355 225,779 S. Utility Systems a High Pressure Compressed Air System,P261 489,600 208.819 279.781 370,679 In ModBns to Elec.&Control Systems,P2J7-1 1,546,800 1,072.486 474.314 1,326,09 LI c Gas Compressor Redundancy.P2-79 439.200 15.995 423.205 28,516 d Utilities Rehab&Refurbishment 13,000 32,969 (19,%9) 65,847 6. Flow Management&Reliability a Peak Flow Management,J67 57,700 32,930 24,770 57,M9 lid 7. Process Related Special Projects a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33,400 5,358 2fl 33.400 8. Information Management a DAFT Hardware and Software Upgrade,SP-21 109,600 - 109,600 9. Miscellaneous&Support Projects a Warehouse@Plant No.2,P265 $61.000 699,599 161,401 899,599 to Facilities Engineavig Projects,FE-P2 1,000,000 "0'006 569,994 710.880 c Tunnel Ughbrg&Monitoring Rehab.,J65 312,400 2,383 310,017 2.383 Sub-Total -Treahnent Plant 17,220,100 6.078.517 11,141, 883 8,347,529 Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Collection Facilities V a Collection Facilities Depot,J-60.1 1,524.300 5.032 1,519,268 5,032 b Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-24 59,700 41.187 15,513 60,523 c SSG Training Facility 20,400 - 20,400 20400 d Co-Op Projects,InBmillnfift.Reduction,J-73 3,475.400 121,222 3.354.178 326:737 Lai Transfer to Projects Below (140.284) - (140,264) - Nuisance Flow Diversion Fee at Newport Dunes 40,000 18,522 21.478 25,0010 SSES for Three Collection Areas,J- l 100.284 1,594 98.690 92.290 a Rehab&Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station,1-10 61.100 576 60.524 1,5W L 2. Headworks a New Grit Augers,J-52 1.073.600 16,882 1,056,718 79,690 3. Secondary Treatment i a Sec.Treatment Mond.&CUI System Upgrade,J-31-4 34,000 6,074 27,WS 34,000 4. Ocean Outfall Systems a Investigation and Repaid of Ocean Outrall,J-39 235.400 141,842 93,568 151.50 to Foster Rehab.&Refurbishment J-59 150,am 71,037 79.763 93.429 U 5. Utility Systems a Gen Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 431,600 629,240 (197.640) 630000 b Cen Gen Air Compressor Controller Upgrade 25.100 - 25.100 250110 Lill c Impry to Car l Generation Starting Air System,J63 122,7W 5,854 116,846 109.679 Yrtl d Mcdff s of Can Gen Waste Heal Boilers,J64 195,000 - 1195.001) - 6. Electrical Power Systems a Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1 8 2,J-35-1 465.300 121,876 343.424 124.110 b Cable Tray Improvements,J47 999.700 344,013 655,687 344,013 V c Electrical Power System Single-line Diagrams,J-25-5 12.900 3 12,897 100 d Electrical Power System Studies,J-25-4 717,400 561.579 155,821 673.634 a Standby Power Reliability Motlilns,J-33-1 4.049,700 3,820.929 228.771 4.720,429 7. Flow Management Reliability 69 a Ouffall Fiew Meter Replacement,J66 852,501) 87.915 764,585 162.116 II Section 3—Page 4 Lr V aw CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year as For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay. 8. Salety,8 Security Improvements a Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J-49 292.500 - 292.600 - b Fire Alarm 8 Security System Upgrade,J-57 40.300 5.105 N,195 15,352 we 9. Information Management 8 Computerization a Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 112,000 16.139 95,861 20.000 b Computerized Fee.Records and Dwg.Sys.,J-25-1 732,600 1,413,976 (681,376) 2.438.707 c Internet Application Development 147,100 73,360 73.740 100.000 aw d Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 625,200 168,190 457,010 200,000 e Fiber Optic Upgrades 512.100 4,672 507,428 3D,000 10.Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects a Modifns to Existing Mechanical System,J-02 1,082.400 27.244 11055.156 37,728 we I Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-J 100,000 631,640 368.360 1,35D,080 c Odor Control Prec.Rehab/Refmt,.,J-71 105,000 67.070 37.930 67,070 Transfer to Projects Below (103.000) - (103.000) - _ Facilities Modifications for Odor Control.J-71-1 5,000 2,127 2,873 27.145 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control,J-71-2 4,D00 1.400 2,600 22,617 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control,J-71-3 25,000 146 24,864 20,098 Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 89.0D0 5,556 63,444 5.566 aw d Tunnels Structural lntegnty and Cover Rehab.,J-55 378,800 115.597 263.203 304,781 e Chlonne Bldg Much Equip Demolition,J40 176,100 2,587 172,513 2,557 f Information Technology Trailers Addition,J-01 369,900 1,653 368,247 1.653 g Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 160.= 69.204 70,796 130.000 aw 11.Water Management Projects a Groundwater Replenishment System.J-36 2.767.400 648,025 2.119,375 1,214,256 12.Plant Automation a Plant Ramwntion/ANomation Project,J42 5,492p00 2,417,293 3,074,707 3,497,397 se b Power Monitoring and Control Systems,J-33-3 $17,600 15.D41 $02.559 17,084 Sub-Total -Interplant B Joint 29,325.700 11.701,402 17.624,298 17.171.371 Sub-Total - Major Projecte 55.685.600 22,851,926 32,633.874 32,091,470 Special Projects r 1. Primary Treatment a Emulsion Poyment Make-down Unit Upgrade 100.000 - 100,000 100.000 2. Solids Handling 8 Digestion a Beg Press Automation 173,000 7.952 165,048 MAN .,. b Biosolids Class A Si ing Assessment 110.000 - 110,000 110.000 c Biosolids Management Site Acquisition 50,100 - 50,100 50,10D 3. Safety 6 Security Improvements a Security System Improvements 405,800 84,718 321.082 110.000 we 4. Process Related Special Projects a Effluent Sampler Improvements 100.000 - 100.000 100.000 5. Information Management a Automation Report Publishing 58,000 23,367 34.633 45,000 aw b CMMS Programming 198,700 2,652 196,048 10.000 c Document Management 264,90D 106.550 158,350 160.000 d Data Integration 1,251,2D0 341,464 909,736 450.000 e Source Conbol Programming 206,200 29.504 176.6% 75,000 we f Strategic Information Architeolore(SIA) 378.700 48,014 330,656 70,000 g Geographic lnforration System 187,60D 28,754 158.846 60.000 h Intranet Application Development 58.100 4,305 53,795 25,000 i SCADA Communications-Ethermel Study 161,900 141 161,759 1.= we j VoicefDaba Building Rewiring 142,100 108,670 33,430 120.000 k Networ Test Facility 31,600 2,182 29.618 31.800 1 Year 2000 Data Change 1,365,400 1,250,105 115,295 1,300.000 m Windows 2000 Ops.System Upgrade Pilot IMAGO 25,894 129.006 164,900 we we Section 3-Page 5 we 1999-00 Third Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 199940 1999-00 199940 199940 Estimated Actual at Remaining Protected Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay n Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 258.600 27,197 241,403 50,000 o Replacement of Intemplant Fiber Optics 75.400 - 75,400 50.000 p Financial Information System 509,800 60,151 449,649 61,000 q Records Management Program 224,800 7,880 216,220 50,000 5. Miscellaneous&Support Projects a Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 446,200 29.864 416,335 200,000 b Revision of Standard Specifications,J44 262,200 172,375 89,825 172,375 y c Shelving/Archiving 30,000 24,560 5,450 30,000 it Office Equipment 7,500 - 7.600 7,51D0 e Portable Storage Building 91500 6.357 4.133 9,500 f Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase l 70.100 - 70,100 70.100 V g Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase ll 50,100 - 50.100 50,100 7. Strategic&Master Planning a Strategic Plan-Phase 3,J40-3 222.600 133.111 89.489 133,111 b Strategic Plan Program EIR,J404 409,500 252,423 157,077 253,4eo c Plant O&M Manual&S.O.P.Project,Phase 1 220.000 1,126 218,875 2.000 8, Water Management Projects a Water Conservation Coop-Toilet Retrofit Pgm,J-72 400,000 465,869 (65.869) 537,980 b Watershed Consultant Services 150,000 - 150.000 9. Research&Development a Special Projects for FY 1999-2000 1,367,600 - 1,367,600 - Transfer to Projects Below (550,090) - (650.090) - .Anoxic Gas Flotation(AGF)Pilot Test 364,500 77,696 286,804 325.000 V Ultrasonic Processing for Digestion Improvement 105.900 20,808 85.092 90.000 G-1,G-2 Conveyor Belt Rehab 41.800 296 41,604 41.800 Testing of Chlorine Sen is r/Monilor at Plant 2 37,890 7,088 30,802 37.890 Sub-Total-Special Projects 10,122,300 3,350,072 6,T72,228 5,194,596 Equipment Items 2,964,200 1,472,684 1,491,618 1,472.584 Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 68,772,300 27,674,582 41,D97,718 38,755,650 Construction In Progress Completed at SUMS 565,224 (565,224) 565,224 Total collections,Treatment and Disposal Projects S 92,401,500 $ 41.691.809 $ 50,709.691 g 60,853.360 Iu 6w L 1� v I.+ Section 3-Page 6 u U CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Currant Total Apemed June 30.1999 Year Projected Remaining r Project Accumulated Projected coatat FUWm ended Coat Cost June 30,2000 Budget Collection$V8mIil lmmovemml Proll Revenue Am 1 .r a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-17 $ 7,494,000 $ 63.503 $ 24.550 $ 78.053 $ 7.415.947 b Msrellaneoue Capital lmprwena is 500,000 500,000 Sub•Totel-Revenue Arm1 7,994.000 53,503 24,550 78.063 7.915.947 Remnm Aim 2 r a same Ana Rim lnlemeplar Reallymni Raledhn,2-41 31,438,41)) 318.348 300,917 709,265 30,729,135 b Senate Am River Interceptor Relief Sever.231 11,853,600 - 51,722 51,722 11,801,878 c Abood Subtnmk Impravemenls,2-50 1,890,100 - 45.865 45,6115 1,844,435 d Eud d Memtde Rehabilitation,234R 1,964,700 612.006 934,637 1,5/8,643 418,057 e Carton Cram Stuns and Pump Sm.Abandonmcrd,2-241 2,604,900 52,149 15,544 67,793 2,617,107 f Eudkl Relief lmpovmetis-Reach-9,2-52 12,213,0DD - 8,138 8,135 12,PW,8W g Maoellaome a Capital lmpmvemenle 2,01)(3,0011, - 47,700 47,700 1,9M.300 h T=k Sever Mapping PrgW 124,700 - 5,000 5,0011, 119,700 ey i Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor parallel Sewer.2-21-1 6.OW,800 - 24,269 24.269 4,984,531 J Rehabilca0on of Outlying Pump Slatere,237 2,834,500 87.131 16,855 103,9106 2,630,514 SaMTotal-Revenue Ame2 71.812,700 1.089634 1,540,547 2,610,181 69,202,519 Revenue Am 3 r a holler-Holder Tmmc Sever System,Reach 1.3361 11.536.6W 1.389.965 5.01 6.472.744 5.067.g88 b Mode.TO Magnolia Relief Sever In Wooden Ave.,30-1 212,3W 138,252 5,517 143,769 65,531 c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Moved-Rehab.,3.11R 480,OW 25.277 389.746 416.023 43,977 d Rahebli8alion of M Magnolia Twlk Serer,3-35R 10,352,OOD 117,833 7,633,881 7,751,724 2,600,276 r e Meoellarggra Capita Imlemme la 2.g00.000 - 239.294 239,294 1,760,709 f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations.237 3,685,301) 121,983 23,597 145,500 3.542.720 9 Trunk Sa aw Mapping Prgecl 151 5,001) 5.000 152,900 Sub-Total-Rworm Ama3 28,407,100 1,794,310 13.M.624 15,174,134 13,mi'af6 r Ravenm ArmS a Relocation of Lmo Pulp Sham,541-1 3,395,200 2,825.786 490.804 3,317,589 T7,611 b Replaoerrlem of Be&Bay Trask Server,546 8,093,81Dg 16.278 208.972 225,250 7,8%.55D c Mscellaneau Capita Impmmrmnla ZODO,WD - 120.352 120= 1,879,648 r d PumpswUm SCADA Communicabom Study 80,500 75.550 20,000 95,550 (15,050) e Rehabilitation of ONy7ng Pump Statiare,237 7.376.700 243,965 47,194 291,159 7,085,641 f Truck Sewer Mapping proled 20,BW - 2,500 2.6W 18,3W Sub-Toml-Revenue Arms 20,967,000 3,162,578 W9,822 4,052,40D 16, 14,BW r Ravonm A.6 a Fairview Relief Samer,6.12 3.594,90D 2,789.702 233,763 3,023,465 571.435 b Mscellaneoue Cepilallmplwememe 500,0100 - 193.795 193.795 306,213 c Rehabilitation of Outlying pump Slatiom.2-37 1,5W,70D 52,279 10,113 62392 1,518.306 �+ d TWk Seger Mapping Prciad 16,600 Z500 2,500 14,100 Sub-Tofal-Bananas Am 6 6692,200 2,841,981 440,171 3,282.152 2,410,048 Revonm Ama] a Rehabllte0on of Ou"ng Pomp Stall-.237 8.693,91DID 297,530 55,612 343.152 8,350,748 r b Raclue1 MII pure,Siatlm AEatdommm,7-143 204,6W - 63,996 63,986 140,614 c Tudin A TbaseNrtmborg Subbtmk Saner,7-27 9.654,400 198,471 126,3511 324,829 9.329.571 d CiderRedNll Tnmk Relocation,732 5,906,5W 5,934 4,897 10.631 5189516M e Orange Trunk lmpmvemems,739 3,942.600 - 29.100 29,100 3,913,400 r f GlslerRedhlll Tmm lmi manneme,Rmtl1"A",738 4.01 - 28.578 28,578 3,997.122 g RA4t'9"Sped arcl Michell Ana.Same Repl.,7-28 417,400 39,361 255,741 295,1W 122.298 h GislerRedMNNalh Truck lmpmvenente,741 5.704,100 - W,129 36,129 5,W7,971 1 Mscellaneam Capital lmprmOmms 2WD.WD - 220,878 220,878 1,779.122 r I &rnoeer interceptor Mammte Rehab.,7-21 5,412,700 77,1)86 39.551 117.517 5205.183 k Pumpladon SCAIDA Cormrarkenrt SWty WOW - 5,W0 S,OW 73.100 1 Tmnk Saver Mapping project 24,900 - 5,000 5,000 19,900 Sub-Tohl-Ravmuo Arm] 48,g84,800 OW 262 770,840 1148Q102 ,R584.898 r Section 3-Page 7 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life I For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 L! cprerd Taal Appoved J.A 1999 year Projected ftanairi g Pro)ect Ac atad Projected Costa Fuhao u Budget c et cost Jum 3D,]DOD Baker Ravawe Area 11 a Hmbrgtoa Beads Sewer artl Abandoment 11-23 538.70D 54,028 1M,677 198.705 3.19,995 b Golder wst Talc Sever Reyaamad,11-17.3 3,920.400 105771 Z45g971 Z56D,742 1,359,658 y c Hal Avenue Intercept".l l-M 4,072,900 99,565 SUZO50 6M.615 3,471,285 d via Avenue Relgf Satyr,I I-M 4,027,70D - 28.464 25.454 4,001,235 e Msallarears Capital brymemarda 2,o0D.M) - gB4,128 954.125 1,015.874 f RehabiWon of Outlyug Purrp Sfatbom,2-37 2.371,100 78,417 15.170 93,587 2277,513 Ld g Rmptatim SGADA Ca mcallans Story 78,100 - 2,50D 215DD 75,6M h Tau k Sewer Mapping Project 41,600 - 5,000 5.000 35,6110 Sub-Tolal-Revenue Area 11 17,050.500 337.781 4,134,998 4,47Z739 12,577,761 Revemre Area 14 Li a fJ6sa41armus CapfallrtprwmenC 200,ODD 24&774 M774 (48.774) Sub-Total-Revave Area 200,ODD - 248,774 248,774 (46774) 1 Total Collection System L irnw nee Projects 198,188,300 9,869,049 21,529,486 31,398535 166.789.766 Treabrerd 8 Disposal Prpieas R anvtlm Mare W.1 1. P mrary Tre at a Fkadwhs No.2 Pimp Inp.B OerhatA 200,210 - 20D.200 2DQ210 - b SLIaP.S.DM Raplaosrart Plfi2 407.400 18.654 75,052 93.706 313694 J c Ca Chenber Modiriatiom,P169 141,800 - 100 100 141:700 2 Binary Treatmart a PMeryTnetr*ad 72 MC8 EMansion,P1-37 75,450.100 1,012.186 1,679,503 Z691,689 7Z758,411 b Pnnmry Effi MP.piigAtaraboa 171,800 11,628 25,000 36,6211 135,272 L 3. Sa ary Treatrrenf a Sraamary Treebrenf EWareionto60MGD,Plafi-2 40,BOQ000 39.322,28E 380,451 39.7CZ739 1.097,261 b Rahwilita'a Four Tdtlding RBere,P1-M 9,SDg00D - 8.601 saw 9,491.399 c Fite Tdddkg FBer Claifias,P1-77 11,500,OOD - 91 91 11,499,909 U 4. So&ffi Hardliig a Dgestim a Mectiardal Seals on tbgh Rafe D'geaa Mw,SPJO 517,000 130.127 IOQODO 23QI27 2B6873 b Oewetedrg Bell Puss Rebdld 526,80D - 150,o00 15QODO 376,800 I 5. 1150y sysmirs u a Cterrial Factlily Moddm,P146-2 4215,300 685.308 Z231,411 Z916,719 1.318,581 b Bad.Fadlify MDVm 8 Safety llpgrades,P1461 44Z9DO 231,921 IM422 422.415 20.485 Trerderb PmjadB (1ZS00) - - - (IZ500) Alarm geaam Inventing ofGs l-bb r 1ZsD0 2,573 IZ40D 14.M (4473) V 6. Safety B Smarty lnprevarms a SeW=Rsbada Fan Sb XUae;, M1 1,329,000 ZOM.014 813,541 3.486.555 (2,157,555) 7. Msanareas B Suppot Projects a Facilities Engiree"Preface,FE-Pi 2D,ODQ000 604,362 7M72B 1 IOADD 18,S89,910 Sub-Toms -Ivrdarnafbn Rand 165,22Z30D 4g691,9m 6,57Z570 51264,533 113,957,767 Treabrerd Plard R 2 i 1. Prebmmry Trestrmnf a 1Yad rks Punpinp"&Owdaul,SP-32 30D,000 93,90E 100,000 193.9DB 106,092 b Rehab of Main Sewage Purrp Motes 2D9,000 - 17SOD0 175,000 M.ODO c H9w&AWkS1rrV a @Pmol2,P266 14,708,000 42792 106.046 14B.Me 14,559,162 Tramfer to Project Below - - - y Replaairent of Baaaeea lMWat Gale.P263 5.032 - 5.032 (S.M2) 2 PmrwyTreaanag a RetebDBEClarifia SwapAms 68,210 - 68,200 682DO V Section 3—Page 8 u CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life - For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Cw Trial Appr J.W,1999 Year Pmtecled P rring _ Protect A=Mdared PrtieCed cortffi Future Budget cost Cost June 311,2000 OWOd 3. SemMary Treabrett a OAF.Sppon Rat Replacwwd 65.000 - 65,000 MOOD - - 4. Sorids HardMg&Digestion a De sterirg Be0 Press P�fld,SP-37 82600D 55.970 250,OOD 306,970 519.030 b Sludge Gnnder Replamme R ahab,SP-W 224AW - 10,000 10.000 214.000 c Rehab of D*sters at Fad Z P2-39 2205&5W 1=114 4.011,042 6247,166 16811,344 - d G1,G2 Comryor Beft Rehab 41.SDO - 41.80D 41AM - e Solidq Storage FacRy 0 Plad Z P2b0 18.32/,911D 693.352 225.779 _ 91%141 17AGS.759 5. lJtility Systers a Kgh Pressure Cmrpressetl Air Syslkrn P24s1 MMODD 61.841 370.679 43Z57D 127.460 r It ModRre to Eke&CWbd Systerrs,P2<7-1 Z637.gOD 701,005 1,326009 2027)DU emm c Cks corrpreaem Rad dancy,P2-79 496800 6D 2016 26576 471,224 d 17dfities Rehab&Refurbishnard 1.000.000 - 65,847 65,847 934.153 6. 19m fJ®ugmenl&Reliability - a RackHmatmagerneMJ67 3.640.000 3.994 57,349 ww 3.618,657 7. th Related Spedal Projects a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacererd 3&40D - 33.40D 33,400 B. Irdwrretion Managenerd a DAFr Hardeare and So%aare Upgrade,SPL21 180.000 17,920 - 17,920 16Z0OD 9. kftscelialmrs&Suppdt Projects a tA6rehouse @ Pard No.Z P265 159&WD 91Z411 699199 1.612010 (14,010) b Faal3ies Fng, e m Projads,F -P2 20.000.OW 575268 710.880 1=148 18.763.a62 - c TunrmJ Ugh rg&Mnnitomg Rehab.,J65 459500 Z303 Z383 457,117 SubtrTotal -Trea6mnd Plard2 97,483,OOD 4.3496T/ &342529 IZ697206 74,765,794 h oeplerd and Jdrd Fad li8es 1. Cdler0on Facilities a Collection FaaOtws Depot J541 1,534,100 - 5.032 5.032 1X9,086 b &shard Tw&Send Rehab.,I-24 3Z863AM 43,798 60.523 104,321 3Z699.179 c SSO TramM FepldY 63,800 - 20.40D 20.400 43.400 _ d CoOp Prgeds,HROWI fOt Reduc8m.173 isuoto OOg - 325,737 326.737 149,61026E TrBsferto ProjectsBew (40.00O) - - - (4(t000) Nuaama Flow DNecsm Facal Newpot Dines 40.000 - 25.000 25,001) 1&006 SSES1or Three Cdk'dim A183S. p761 10UM - 92290 9229D 7.991 e Rehab&Upgrade of Ella Ave.Pure StattM 1-10 1.799e%D - 1,5M 1,600 1,79a,17W 2 11eadworla a Nex68Augers,J52 1,210,000 4ZO97 79,690 121,757 1,088213 3. Semndary Treabrend ey a Sec Trea0lerdl%D t&Chi SystrntA+gro0e.J314 4,315,000 450644 34,OW 493,644 3.871}56 4. Oman OWa0 Systars a Imesb9atimerd Repaidof Ooosn Odfal,J39 1,274,60D 91Z454 151.548 1,OK012 210568 b Foetec Rdnb.&RtlwbsWmKJ&9 28203,000 - 93,429 93.429 28.106.57E 5. t101fly Systers a Car Can EAghvaAir Enw;aNlmdtadn9Sys 563,20D 1%185 630.00O 7KI85 (231.985) It Can Gen AirCurpmswrCa&dW 11139r2de 25,100 - 25.OM 25ADD 100 c IntrvroCermal Generator Starting Air System J63 140,700 72a3 f0&679 116,902 23.798 - d Modfrscf Can Cm WaNettssl Bdkrs J64 200,000 5,979 - 5.879 IK121 6 Ehedrirsl Poner Systerns a Area Claaaifimema Sundae.Parts 1&2,J35-1 1 146000 594.198 124.110 718,308 426M b Cable Tray lcpaiarerYa,J47 1Z750,000 40&711 3M,013 75Z724 11,9972ZM c Eleemiiml Pone,Syetan Sr9le-6re Dugrars,J-25-5 3,367,500 - 100 100 3.367.400 d BecbKW Pacer Syslen SSkI,.L254 3215.500 957.796 673.634 1.641.430 1,574.070 e Stadby Pacer Relabilfty Maas,3331 17,370,1W 1559,666 4,7211.429 6280.294 11,009.805 7. FIM Managen,att&Whibifdy a Offs]Fav Mater Replaamnt J66 924.000 7.639 162116 16&755 754245 - Secflon 3-Page 9 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report L Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life I I For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 L Qarent Total Approved[ June M,1999 Year Projected Remaining L Project Ac Itded Prolechad Coma Future Budget cost Cost June 30,2000 Budget a. Salary&Seamy lrrpmvarema a Confined Spare Personnel Retrieval System,J49 423.000 23.04 - 23.994 399AM It Rm Almon&6eoviy SMrar UpWado J S21,000 612.64 15= 627,416 (416) ij 9. Information Management&CampuleNrstion a W ralhose Bar Code Evaluation 112J6D 16.139 20AM X139 75,1161 b Carqulaired Fac Reo udc end pg.Sys,12 I 4,95S300 SK462 2436,707 3.331180 1,821,111 c Internet Appti000n De Aopment 382,200 96,579 10D,00D 196579 185AM L d Nee ark Baddeone Upgrade CoMmstion 1,4'9,M0 SM125 200,000 W125 573.876 e Fiber Optic Upgrades 680,000 241,120 301OW 271,120 389,980 10. Miscellaneous&Support Pmjeds a Mortars to Erbsting Medraapl System,J62 26942M 217,653 37,728. 255,391 Z43MM Vj b Facades Fsgineedrg Rejects,FEJ 20.OMAW 750,10 1,3W.080 2,1ODXI3 17,889.767 c Ode Cordial Pmn ReluM2efob.,J-71 5,337.0110 - 67.070 U7,070 5AMM Trsrsterto Projects Below (103,W0) - - W1- (103.0 Fadities Modifications for Odor Cordml,J-71-1 5,000 - 27.145 27.10.5 (22,14.5) Lai FaolNes Mocifastiers for Odor Cmmd,J-714 4,W0 - 22,617 22.617 (18,617) Footless ModifipOms for Odor Cddrd,J-71-3 25,000 - 20.096 20.098 4902 Comprehensive Odor COMB A5ses"B'd 69,00D - 5,556 5,555 63,4M I d Tumels Sn Baal lmegmy and Rehab.,J65 428,3M 43,W1 3D4,781 347,782 78.518 L e CMaine Bldg Meth EmdP DerreStiat J 210,70D V.241 25e7 29,82E 180'm f bdom mTedvMogy Trailer Add[NCAJ61 397.100 27,416 1.60 29,W9 388,M7 g Small CapBal E>T.dpmem Repa¢srrn Prejed 240,000 99.728 130.OW 229,728 10.272 L 11. Wmer Maregenenl Projects a GmaWstef RepsnshnsJd Slslean,J-36 121,9N1. M 79 AU 1,214285 2011,948 119MZ752 12. Plem Autoratioi a F7amReimentia/AtdmutlonPmojed,J42 25,76D,4W 2215.888 3,487,397 6.703,085 20,05 =b L' Prier MOMartrg artl CmNd Srylens,J333 4.047.300 692 17,M 17.776 4029.620 Sub-Tobd -Intarplent&Joim 450,651,084 11,904227 17,171,371 29,075,9% 421X5A86 Sub-Total - Major Projects 7W,356.384 W,945,857 3ZO91.470 93,037.337 610,319.047 Special P-)ecb I I 1. Pnnoy Treataard L a Emrdaon Polymenl Makedown the Upgrade 1 W.000 - 1M,I100 1W,W0 - 2. Solids Nar&ng&DigesSon a Bed Bess Automation 175,000 8.502 SQOM 58.502 116ASB I b BiosOttis ClassaASUng As�sncm 110.000 - 110,000 110,OM - L c Biomlids&laiagenmam Stu Atqusidon 5D,100 - W,iW W,100 - 3. Surety&Seaaiy1mpmao%ar1s a See-ty System Orlaxvaaads 1,3328OD 363,499 110.WD 4TJ,499 aWdM I 4. Process Raised Special Projects L a FJfiuem Senator lrgmvarenfs 100.000 - 100,000 100,000 - 5. Infonretiw Managemend a Automation Report Publishing 195,00D 58.579 45,00D 103,579 91,421 It CMMS Progrzmrang 490,000 271A30 10,001) 251,430 M570 L.I c DcaaneM Management 800= 296,Z79 160,001) 456,279 343,721 d Data lmegmdon 4,334,000 1,651.848 450.000 2,101,848 2232152 e Source Coned Programmvng 576,M0 3D4,378 75.000 379,378 198,622 I f Sbmegk Inlmration Mhhedme(SIA) 724,000 221,807 70.000 291.8D7 43ZI93 Yrl 9 Geographic lmomution System 874.000 49,867 W,WO 109,857 764,143 h Intranet Appfi b.Developmard 235,600 74,322 25,000 99.322 136278 i SCItOA Conmwioliors-Elennet Study 161,9110 - 1,DW 1,M0 1609W u 1 Vdoe7Data Bulding Revming 6WAOD 486,9W 120,000 606,903 73,197 k Ne rlt Teal Faa5ty 125,00D 81.4W 31,WO 113259 11.741 I Year 2000 Data Charge 3,465,4W 1,W9,889 1,300,000 3209,8811 255,512 m Wtrtlove 20DO Ops.System Upgrade not 154,900 - 154.900 154,9W - Section 3-Page 10 IL.1 CJ CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 ammt Total Approved June W.19% Year Projected Roealning Project Accumulated Projected 3 L Future ne Budget Cost Coal Ju0.2060 Budget o Flapsoa OPBCTeminal StandeColes n 324, 82,030 50,000 -32 150.030 192,670 o Financsrtenteflflon Syste , Oplb 498,500 - 61,000 50,000 448,500 �.+ p Fwndalllanage on Syslem 2,958,000 2,307,522 50,000 2,368,522 569,478 q Recerds e&Su pee Program 255,000 - 50,000 50,000 205,000 6. tAzoellenears 8 Supped Projects a Scrubber Cherdcal Feed S/dem Mad. 81R200 113,601 200" 313,601 498,599 r b Revision of Standard Spedfira0one,J-04 439.70D 251.425 172.375 423,800 15,900 c SheNingrAichMnu 30,000 - 30,000 30,000 - d Office Equipment 7.500 - 7,500 7,500 - a Potable Storage Building %600 - 9,500 9,500 - r f Oceen Monitotrg Detainees-Phase 1 70.100 - 70,101) 70,100 - g Ocean Montodng Database-Phase ll 50,100 - 50,101) 50,100 - 7. Sbategic&Mader Rannirg a Strategiclil.,Maso3,J-40.3 2,163.700 1,857,101 133,111 1.990,212 203,488 b Strategic Ran Progmen FJRJ-404 1,120,100 541,714 253,460 795,174 324,926 c Rant O&MManual&S.O.P.Project.Phase 1 230,000 - 2.000 2,000 228,000 8. Wzler Management Projects a Wafer Conservation Coop-Toilet Retrofit PgAJ-72 4,840,000 252,102 637,960 790,062 3,853,938 b Watershed Conwhent Services 150,000 - - - 150,000 9. Research B Developrrem a Special"ees/or R'1999-2000 1,387,80D - r Trerider to Projects Be. (62SOM - - - Si Arlodc Gas Flclabon(AGP)Mot Test 419,000 - 325,000 325,000 94,000 Ultrai Pmoessing for Digestion lrrprovemeM 128,230 - 90,000 KODO 38,230 G1,G2 Conveyor Bee Rehab 41,800 - 41,800 41.800 - ,�, Testing of Chlonm Sonsoilklondor at Read 2 37,890 37,89D 37,890 Sub-Total-Special Projects 29,844,500 11,114.246 5,194,596 16,378,842 13,466658 Equlpi end))rare 4819tuilm 1,472,S84 1,472,SB9 47,491,616 Total Treabnom&Deposed Projects 7M,165,084 72.130,113 3&758,6W 110,888,763 671,276.321 r Consm¢gon In Progmss Completod al 6130199 551509,490 565,224 56,07g714 (56,074,714) Total collections,Tree rleM and Mai l Projects $980,353,384 S 137,508.652 $ 60=.360 $19836z012 $781,991,372 r r r ` Section 3-Page 11 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report L I � L+ IV L� This Page Left Intentionally Blank L V u V L L 'V U Section 3—Page 12 IU U Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Operatinta BWaet Review r 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Data Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Nlocations/SuWenlims(Sham of 1%) $ 32,861,000 $ 22.470.712 $ 10,390,288 68.38% Connection Fees 5,187.000 5,357,402 (170,402) 103.29% Other Fees 74,3D1,ODD 49,958,710 24,342,290 67.24% Sale of Capacity Rights 198.000 - 19SD00 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 26,778,000 12,854,129 13,893,871 48.11% r Total Revenues $ 139,323,000 $ 90.670,953 $ 48,652,D47 65.08% OUTLAYS: r Share of Joint Works Treabrent Plant CIP $ 68.771,000 $ 28239,806 $ 40,531,194 41.08% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Consdu*on 23.629,200 13,45{O03 10.177,197 56.93% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 41,690,000 37.487.320 4202,680 89.92% v„ Share of Joint Vdaks Operating Expense.; 44,D00,000 32,810287 11,189,733 74.57% Revenue Prey Operating&Other Expenses 9,355,500 29,384212 (20,027,712) 314.05% Total Outlays $ 187,446,700 $141,373,608 $ 46.073,092 75.42% r Capital Facilities Budcet Review .. Balance Adjsorcrds Trarsferto Balance 07/01199 &AddNons Fixed Assets 03/31/00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Anal'Constniction in Progress $ 41,359.189 $ 13,452,003 $ - $ 54.811,192 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 68,714,703 28.239.805 - 96,954,509 Sub-Total 110,073,892 41,691,809 - 151,765,701 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 2.675257 - - 2,875257 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3OZ933274 - - 302933274 Treatmerd Facilities 19,112 - - 19,922 Disposal Fadlities 101,528 - - 101,528 General Plant and Adnunishative Facilities 885,732 _ _ 886,732 Equity in Jdnt Tmatrrem Facilities 783.840,058 - - 783,840.058 Other Assets at Cost Less Am rtvzUon 44,434 - - 44.434 Sub-Total 1,090,50D215 - - 1,090,500,215 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $12D0,574,107 $ 41,091.809 $ - $1242,265,916 `+ Section 4-Page 1 1999-00 Third Quarter Report iiRevenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Operating Budget Review 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Data Budget %of Budget I l REVENUES: U Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) $ 1.859,000 E 1,522,520 $ 336,480 81.90°/< Connection Fees 455.000 189,843 255,157 41.72% Other Fees 8,410,000 5,153,980 3,256,020 61.28% ha of Capacity Rights - - - - Interesl&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,549,000 599,135 949,865 38.68% Total Revenues $ 12,273,000 $ 7,465.478 $ 4,807,522 60.83% V OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 7,661,000 $ 3,131,794 $ 4,529,206 40.88% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 32,000 20,593 11.407 64.35% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 5,848,000 4,887,390 960,610 83.57% 11 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,699,000 3.392.582 1,306,418 7220% V Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 599,000 2,003,530 (1,404,530) 334.48% Total Outlays $ 18,839,000 $ 13.435,889 $ 5,403,111 71.32% I Capital Facilities Budget Review L Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101199 &Additions Fixed Assets 03Y31100 if CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: `,( Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 53.575 $ 20,593 $ _ $ 74,168 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 7,620,461 3,131,794 - 10,752,255 Sub-Total 7.674,036 3,152,387 - 10,826,423 IL11 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: j Land and Pmperty Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 LJ Collection Lines and Pump Stations 6,903,001) - 6,903,000 Treatment Facilities - _ Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 L,I General Plant and Administrative Facilities 58.241 - _ W241 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 86.894.517 - - 86,894,517 I Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - _ _ J Sub-Total 93,948.749 - - 93,948,749 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $101,622,785 $ 3,152,387 $ - $ 104,775,172 L Section 4-Page 2 Iy U Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Operating Budget Review r 1999-00 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Data Budget %of Budget r REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 10,064,000 $ 6.805,257 $ 3,258,743 67.62 Connection Fees 2,002.000 2,013,086 (11,086) 10D.55% Other Fees 23,910,000 16,357,9W 7,552,070 68.41% r Sale of Capacity Rights 148,000 - 148,000 - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 8,181,000 3.940,997 4,240,003 48.17% ,r Total Revenues $ 44,305,DD0 $ 29,117.270 $15.187,730 65.72% OUTLAYS: r Shan:of Joint Works Treatment Plana CIP $ 20,150,000 $ 8.398,518 $11,751,482 41.68% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 3,827.200 1,241,005 2,586,195 32.43°A COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 13,188.000 12,798.605 389,395 97.05°A r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,737,000 10,489,442 3,247,558 76.36% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,688,000 8,576,214 (5,888,214) 319-06% Total Outlays $ 63,590,200 $ 41,503,784 $12,088,416 77.45% r r Capital Facilities Buddat Review Balance Adjustments Trensferto Balance 07/01/99 &Additions Rxed Assets 03131/00 r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 2,484,196 $ 1,241,005 $ - $ 3,725,201 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 20,435,753 8,398,518 - 28,634,271 Sub-Total 22,919,949 9,639,623 - 32,559,472 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 517.694 - - 517,094 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 96.923.040 - - 95,923,040 Treatment Facilities - - - - r Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 218.649 - 218,549 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 233,024.296 - - 233,024,296 r Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 1,125 - - 1.125 Sub-Total 330,717.876 - - 330,717,876 r Total Property,Plant 8,Equipment&CIP $353,637,825 $ 9.639.523 $ - $363,277,348 r r Section 4-Page 3 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Revenue Area No.3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 L Operating Budget Review � j 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Data �J Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: L Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 10,902,000 $ 7,453.095 $ 3,448,905 68.36% Connection Fees 1,274,000 1,103,097 170,903 86.59% Other Fees 23,013,000 15,194.923 7,818,077 66.03% 1 Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - IMerest B Miscellaneous Revenue 8,447,000 4,269,789 4,187,211 50.43% Total Revenues $ 43,638,000 $ 28.010.904 $15,825,096 64.19% V OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 21,282,OW $ 8.703,509 $12,58S491 40.88% �+ Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 8,810,300 8,406,590 403,710 95.42% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 12,393,000 11,610,424 782,576 93.695% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,198,000 9,784.022 3,411,978 74.14% 64 Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,349,O00 7,983,107 (5,614,107) 339.00 Total Outlays $ 58,040,300 $ 46,467,652 $ 11,572,648 80.06% Capital Facilities Budget Review J Balance Ad)ushnents Transfer to Balance _ 07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: LI Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 12,323,104 $ 8,408,590 $ - $ 20,729,694 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 21,177,871 8.703,509 - 29,881,380 Sub-Total 33,500,975 17.110,099 - 50,611,074 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: L; Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 70,577.818 - - 70,577.818 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 11 Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28.419 4r� General Plant and Administrative Facilities 320,153 - - 320.153 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 241.486.220 - - 241,486,220 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - - wl Sub-Total 312,702,763 - - 312,702,763 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP $346,203,738 $ 17,110,099 $ - $ 363.313,837 IuI L li L Section 4-Page 4 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Operating Budget Review r 1999-00 Year To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ 3,014.000 $ 2,091,224 $ 922,776 69.38% Connection Fees 364.000 29,870 334,130 8.21% Other Fees 2,462,000 1,872,819 589,181 76.07% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,724,000 982,819 741,181 57.01% r Total Revenues $ 7,564,000 $ 4,976,732 $2,587,268 65.79% OUTLAYS: r Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 2,785,000 $ 1,140,888 $1.644.112 40.97% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 1,615,400 822,271 793.129 50.90% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,820,000 2,273,771 (453,771) 124.93% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,734,000 1,250,071 483,929 72.09% Revenue Area Opereting&Other Expenses 890.500 1,049,619 (959.119) 207.71% Total Outlays $ 8.844,900 $ 7,336.620 $1,508,280 82.959/6 r Capital Facilities Budget Review H Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31/00 r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 4,907,830 $ 822,271 $ - $ 5,730,101 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,776,074 1.140,888 - 3,916,962 Sub-Total 7,683.904 1,963,159 - 9,647,083 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: r Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69,740 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 34,299.567 - - 34.299.567 Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347 r Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 39.402 - - 39,402 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 31.655,177 - 31,655.177 r Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - - Sub-Total 66,078,348 - - 66,078,348 r Total Preperty,Plant&Equipment&CIP $73.762,252 $ 1,963.159 $ - $75,725,411 r r Section 4-Page 5 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Iof Revenue Area No.6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review I I For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Operating Budget Review I d 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: �bd Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 1,382,000 $ 872,064 $ 509.936 63.10% Connection Fees 91,000 23,525 67,475 25.85% Other Fees 3,593,000 2,556,401 1,036,599 71.15% 1 , Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interesl&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,481.000 713.478 767.522 48.18% Total Revenues $ 6.547,000 $ 4,165.468 $2,381,532 63,62% J OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 2,558,000 $ 1,044,873 $ 1.513,127 40.85% u Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 922,800 435,649 487.151 47.21% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,457,D00 1.364.121 92,879 93.63% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.742,000 1.335.378 406,622 76.66% 6.i Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 262,500 1.263,996 (1,001,498) 481.52% Total Outlays $ 6.942,300 $ 5,444,017 $ 1,498,283 78.42% V Capital Facilities Budget Review )� Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: J Revenue Area Construction In Progress $ 6.603.872 $ 435,649 $ - $ 7.039,521 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,542,444 1,044,873 - 3,587.317 Sub-Total 9,146,316 1.480.522 - 10,628,838 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT: j Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 5,153,761 - - 5,153,761 Treatment Facilities 2,653 - 216M Disposal Facilities 7,394 - - 7,31M �r General Plant and Administrative Facilities 113.761 - - 113,761 _ Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 28,991.098 - - 28,901,098 ' Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - jJ Sub-Total 34.269,229 - - 34,269.229 Total Property,Plent 8 Equipment&CIP $43,415,545 $ 1,480,522 $ $44,898,067 y V J Section 4-Page 6 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 Operating Budget Review r 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) $ 3,293.000 $ 2.139,580 $ 1,153.420 64.97% Connection Fees 364.000 884,405 (520.405) 242.97% Otter Fees 7,367.000 4,874.225 2,492,775 66.16% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2,170,0DD 1.021,061 1,148,939 47,05% Total Revenues $ 13,194,000 $ 8,919.271 $ 4,274,729 67.60% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 7,180,000 $ 2,931,292 $ 4,248,708 40.83% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 2,155,900 755,764 1,400,136 35.06% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,677,000 2,436.001 1,140,999 68.10% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,488,000 3,235.092 1,252,908 72.08% Revenue Area Operating&Otter Expenses 1,422,5W 3,578,023 (2,155,523) 251,53 Total Outlays $ 18,823,400 $ 12.936,172 $ 5.887,228 68.72% r Capital Facilities Budget Review h Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 6.940,555 $ 755.764 $ - $ 7,696,319 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 7,132,586 2,931,292 - 10.053.878 Sub-Total 14,073,141 3,687.056 - 17,760.197 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: r Land and Property Rights 1,578,655 - - 1,578,656 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 41,248.462 - 41248,462 Treatment Facilities - - - r+ Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10.782 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 98,197 - - 98,197 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 81.331,301 - - 81,331,301 .+ Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 43,309 - - 43,3D9 Sub-Total 124,310,707 - - 124,310,707 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 138,383,848 $ 3,687,056 $ - $ 142,070,904 .r Section 4-Page 7 r 1999-00 Third Quarter Report L Revenue Area No.11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Operating Budget Review j 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dats y Budget Date Budget %of Budget -- REVENUES: II V . Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 2,347,000 $ 1,585,794 $ 761.208 67.57% Connection Fees 364,000 693,698 (229.698) 163.10% - Other Fees 4,693,000 3,288,873 1,404,127 70.08 Sale of Capacity Rights 48,000 - 48,000 - Ir Interest B Misoellaneous Revenue 1,810,000 786,170 1,023,830 43.43% Total Revenues $ 9,262,OW $ 6,254.535 $ 3.007.465 67.53% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 4,539,000 $ 1,838,411 $ 2.700,589 40.50% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,259.600 1,521,357 4,738,243 24.30% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3.220,000 1,964,086 1,255,934 61.00% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,688,000 1,880,028 807,972 69.94% Ls Revenue Area Operating 8 Other Expenses 904.500 3,064,858 (2,160,358) 338.85% Total Outlays $ 17,611,100 $ 10,268,720 $ 7,342,380 58.31% I I Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 7,996,081 $ 1,521,357 $ - $ 9,517,438 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 4,473,327 1,838,411 - 6,311.738 Sub-Total 12,469,408 3,359,768 - 15,829,176 L11 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT: Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 19,050,027 - - 19,050,027 Treatment Facilities - - - - I Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 L General Plant and Administrative Facilities 30,882 - - 30,682 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 51,008.485 - - 51,008,486 1 Other Assets at Cost Less Amorfization - - - - u Sub-Total 70,239,233 - - 70.239.233 Total Property,Plant&Equipment 8 CIP $82,708,697 $ 3,359,788 $ - $86,068.409 � V L Section 4-Page 8 L Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No.13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Operatina Budget Review r 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-0ate Budget Data Budget %of Budget REVENUES: r Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ - $ 1,178 $ (1,178) - Connection Fees 273,000 519,878 (246,878) 190.43% Other Fees 853,000 655,518 197,482 76.85% r Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 732,000 362,830 369,170 49.57% ^, Total Revenues $ 1,858,OOD $ 1,539,404 $ 318.598 82.85% OUTLAYS: r Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 818.000 $ 336,054 $ 481,946 41.08% Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction - - - - COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 22.222 4.778 82.30% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 532,000 462,625 69,375 86.96% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expanses 27,000 616,780 (589,780) 2284.37% Total Outlays $ 1,404,000 $ 1,437,681 $ (33,681) 102.40% r Capital Facilities Budget Review .i Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31/00 r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ - $ - $ - $ - ShamofJointWorksTreatmentPlantClP 817,705 336,054 - 1,153,759 ^' Sub-Total 817,705 336,054 - 1.153,759 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: `+ Land and Property Rights - - - Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3,175,032 - - 3,175,032 Treatment Facilities - - r'� Disposal Facilities General Plant and Administrative Facilities - - - Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 9,324.069 - - 9,324,069 r Other Assets at Cast Less Amortvation - - - - Sub-Total 12,499,101 - - 12,499,101 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 13.316,806 $ 336,054 $ - $ 13,652,860 r Section 4-Page 9 r I ', 1999-00 Third Quarter Report w Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 �•i Operating Budget Review I 1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Li Budget Date Budget %of Budget REVENUES: �+ Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - 8 - $ - - Connection Fees - -Other Fees - 4,041 (4,041) - V Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 684,000 217,850 466,150 31.85% - Total Revenues $ 684,000 $ 221,891 $ 462,109 32.44% Y4 OUTLAYS: Shan;of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 1.788.000 $ 714.467 $1,073.533 39.96% W Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,00D 248.774 (242,774) 4146.23% _ COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 160,000 130,720 29.280 81.70% 1 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.184,000 981,027 202,973 82.86% 1.1 Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 213,500 468,085 (254.685) 219.24% Total Outlays $ 3,351.600 $ 2.543,073 $ 808,427 75.88% I I Capital Facilities Budget Review 1601 Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101199 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 49,976 $ 248,774 $ - $ 298,750 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 1,738,482 714.467 - 2.452,949 1 Sub-Total 1,788,458 963,241 - 2,751,699 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: ' Land and Property Rights - - _ _ �I Collection Lines and Pump Stations 25,602,567 - - 25,602,567 Treatment Facilities - Disposal Facilities - _ _ - General Plant and Administrative Facilities 6,747 - - 6,747 Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 20,124,895 - = 20,124,895 Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - _ Sub-Total 45,734,209 - - 45.734.209 Total Properly,Plant&Equipment&CIP $47,522,667 $ 963.241 $ - $48,485,908 y� I V Section 4-Page 10 ICI u Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 r Pena Acted of Budget Retaining Aeod 1999-N Thmgh Through 1999.00 Thmgh h eme r Budget 03r."/00 0331N0 Budget OY31M (Deaeme) 1. Beginning Reserves $1.981,193 $1,592,701 WA WA $2.059,473 $ (466.772) r Revenues 2. In-Lieu Preiiunn - - WA - - r 3. lift t&h$soell m 100,000 40,438 40.44% 59,562 76,274 (35,8W) 4. Allocation hom OOwr Funds 700,000 437,629 6262% 2BZ371 306= 131,346 r 5. TOW Revenues 800,000 478,067 59.76% 321,933 382,557 95,510 r r 6. Salaries.Wages and BemBls - - WA - - - 7. gemfi6A7aim 166,000 179,232 108.63% (14,232) 149,084 30.148 r 8. Contractual Services 3,500 981 28.03% Z519 1,394 (413) 9. Legal Services 500,000 395,712 79.14% 104,288 440,454 (44,742) m' 10. Professional Services 3.OD0 Z130 71.OD% 970 1,068 1,052 11. %ppbw&UJ er 500 177,614 3552280% (177,114) (16) 177,630 r 12 Sub-TOW Expems 67ZODO 755.669 112.45% (83,889) 591,964 163,685 13. Beese Loss Pormy 120,000 83,619 69.66% 36,381 63,619 r 14, Total Expenses 79ZODO a39,288 105.97% (47288) 675,603 163,605 r 15. Eaeses Revemm(Elgtemes) 8,000 (381,221) 4515.26% 369,221 (293,046) (68,175) r 16. Ending Reserves $1,989,193 $1.231.480 61.91% WA $1,766.427 $ (534,9471 r r r Section 5-Page 1 1999-00 Third Quarter Report Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 Percent Ld Actual of Budget Rerroirting Actual 1999-00 Through Through 19".00 Through Increase Budget CY31M 03131/00 Budget CY31M (Decrease) u 1. Beginning Reserves $ 520,052 $ 812,383 WA WA $ 563,272 $ 249.111 Revenues 2. In-Lieu Pnmuums 310,000 232,496 75.00% 77,504 164,250 68,246 - 3. Interest BMiscellaneous 25.000 14.957 59,83% 10,043 19,923 (4,9W W 4, Total Revemlas 335,000 247,453 73.87% 87.547 184,173 63,280 11�1 Expenses 4i 5. Salaries.Wages and Bereft - _ NIA _ _ _ 6. BenditaCia ms 225,000 240,062 106.69% (15,062) 147,453 92,609 l 7. Contractual Services 25,000 18.750 75.00% 6,250 - 18,760 8. Legal Services 27.000 22.218 8229% 4,782 9,671 12,547 64 9. Professional Services 30,000 32,505 108.35% (2,506) 12,023 20,483 10. Supplies&Otter 34.677 WA (34,677) 34,677 V 11. Sub-Total Expenses 307,000 348,213 113.42% (41,213) 169,147 179,066 12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 16,023 7121% 6,477 116,290 (267) v 13. Total Expenses 329,500 364.236 110.54% (34,736) 185,437 178,799 l L.I 14. Excess Revenue(Expanded) 5,500 (116.783) -2123.33% 122.283 (1,264) (115,519) - W 15. Ending Reserves $ 525.552 $ 695,600 132.35% WA $ 562.008 $ 133,592 V Ir v Li Section 5-Page 2 i tJ Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE General Management Administration (Division 110) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Ensure treatment cost does $482/MG 5495/MG Costs slightly above Gallonage charge due not exceed target by end of to flows being lower by 3.7%compared to fiscal year original budget projections. Ensure District meets 517.26 FTEs by 506.75 FTEs As of 3130/00. adopted 3-year staffing end of fiscal year plan Maintain 1 D3%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. with Permit Compliance Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 44% Expenditures well under target through mid- (capital projects)CORF year. $34.3M spent versus$78.5M Budget by end of year CORF/Collections system budget. Expenditures are anticipated to increase during latter half of fiscal year as significant construction gets underway. Ensure District Performance 80% 75%Performance Performance objectives have neatly been met Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives during the first six months. Workplan milestones met within Objectives 63%Workplan milestone tasks are behind in some areas, targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see largely due to prior Y2K efforts and the Milestones Summary) Huntington Beach Closure Project. Note that with GM approval,a few scheduled workplan tasks were delayed to next fiscal year given appropriate justification. Total District-Wide Not Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data Tracked Through 9 Months 246 155 68 23 63%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled through 9 months of FY 99/00 were completed. A few of these tasks were deferred per the General Manager. Please see individual division sections for additional details on activities behind schedule. Section 6- Page 1 1999-00 Third Quarter Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Administration (Division 210) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data —� Average Rate of Return 5.1% 5.8% The portfolios outperformed their respective on Liquid Portfolio Index benchmarks. Average Rate of Return 3.8% 4.7% The portfolios outperformed their respective on Long-term Portfolio benchmarks. Index Average Interest Rate 2.75% 2.73% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. Paid on variable(COP) Borrowing r General liability cost:% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met. Premiums compared to .60% .25% - Operating Budget Workers Comp insurance cost: %premiums 1.50% 1.03% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met, compared to Payroll r Remain at or under the $44.0 Million by $32.8 Million over 9 Expenses below 75%"9 month target" net Joint Operating (J.O.) end of fiscal months(74.6%total) year Workplan Tasks Not 3f°Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 3 4 0 Delays due to consultants'work slightly behind schedule and slight delays obtaining Board approvals. Section 6 - Page 2 Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting (Division 220) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Months Summary of Data Issue monthly financial First month(July)missed which is typical reports within 10 working 92% 78% due to end-0I-year processing. Delay in days Jan.due to Y2K-related work. We expect remaining months to be on schedule. Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 90% This work to be completed in 4th quarter. study Complete Policy and 100%by year end 60% 60%progress with expectation of Procedures Manual completion by years end. Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 3 3 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Section 6- Page 3 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data Target Through 9 Months Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 97.91% 9-month cycle counting program met program Rating benchmark target. Complete by Completed Completed successfully. Implement Outreach 4/00 Program Implement Procurement Complete by Pilot Program Pilot program still underway. Card Program 2100 Develop Master Contracts Complete by Completed Completed for consultants/services 3/00 Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data — 5 4 1 0 One training program slightly behind schedule. Section 6 - Page 4 Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications(Division 310) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target achieved. Turnaround Time 100%of time Board Minute Preparation 10 day 91% Target missed due to vacation during one Turnaround Time turnaround month. 100%of time Photowpying Services 93%+ 93% Target achieved. Satisfaction Graphics Services 95%+ 96% Target achieved. Satisfaction Visitor Tour Satisfaction 65%+ 95% Target achieved. Rating Workplan Tasks. - Not 3i0 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks wmpleled. Section 6-Page 5 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - HR & EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Divisions 510) — Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Address employee 90%within 3 100%within 1.4 days Target exceeded. development requests days HR Department managed 90-100%of 71%expended through Target met, within budget budget 9 months Achieve 3-year staffing plan 517.25 FTE's by 506.75 FTE's through 9 This is well below our end-of-year target. projections years end months Ensure Department 90% 98% Target met. achieves 90%+of budget r performance objectives r Workplan Tasks Not 310 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data — 7 5 2 0 Completion of 501 negotiations behind desired schedule. r r Section 6- Page 6 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Technical Services Administration (Division 610) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Summary of Data Months Ensure divisions' 85%, 87.5% Exceeds benchmark target. performance objectives are met. Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 97.1%(annualized) Target met through 9 months. expenditures are managed Workplan Tasks - Not 30 Quarter Complete - Behind Started .Summary of Data 1 0 1 0 Internal operations study of department slightly behind schedule. .. Section 6-Page 7 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Summary of Data Months Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target met. core ocean monitoring sampling Ensure workplan project 95%of Deadlines 100% Target met. milestones completed on rr time. Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met. reports/data submitted on time Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met. reported on time. r Workplan Tasks Not 3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 7 3 4 0 V Tasks behind related to information technology implementations and dairy project issues. r r Section 6 - Page 8 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance _ Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 90% Target met. testing productivity at/above Multi-agency benchmark parameters. Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 90% Target met testing productivity within norm 10%of FY 98/99 in-house productivity standard. Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 100%on 1st analysis Target met. on laboratory samples tat analysis; 100%on 2nd Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 90% Internal standards established in November, analyses established '98. Turnaround times standard met. none Workplan Tasks Not Yd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. r Section 6 - Page 9 1999-00 Third Quarter Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control (Division 640) Performance Objective 199mo Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Maintain field inspection 2.6 monitoring 2.8 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods data is for 2nd quarter of FV 99100. Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. actions within 30 days of non-compliance event Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prior to expiration _ Implement Technical Complete 90+% 100%completed Milestone targets met. Resource Program of milestones on time Workplan Tasks Not 3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 2 4 0 Detailed review of draft ordinance behind schedule due to EPA delays. Section 6-Page 10 .. Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Safety & Emergency Response (Division 650) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 97% Customer Service remains a division wRhin 2 work days priority. Ensure Injury Incidence is 6.5 incidence 9.3 This target has not been met due to an 24%below industry rate increase in frequency of accidents average requiring time off. Additional emphasis being provided on"safe work practices.' Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 5.6 This target has not been met due to an Incidence Rate 42%below rate increase in frequency of accidents industry average requiring time off. Additional emphasis being provided on'safe work practices' Workers Compensation $403 $271 Costs were negligible due to type of Cost Factor 30%below accidents that did occur requiring limited industry average medical cost payments. Workplan Tasks Not 3i0 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 0 0 0 1 0 Not applicable this quarter. Section 6-Page 11 1999-00 Third Quarter Report ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Division 7101720') Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Manage Capital Projects 80%. 44% Expenditures well under target through 9 CORF Budget expended by months. $34.3 spent versus$78SM year's end CORF/Collections system budget. Expenditures are anticipated to increase during latter half of fiscal year as significant construction gets underway. Final target for CIP may be 67%of initial budget. Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 85% 677 projects bid on schedule. established Capital Improvement Program schedule Meet design project 80%.of time 71% Approaches target benchmark as 63/89 milestones project milestones completed. Meet Division 710/720/730 Less than 74% Target met for 9-month expenditure trend. JO budgets 100% expended Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% Target met. correspondence within 30 working days Workplan Tasks Not 3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data w 5 3 0 2 Some training and sections of policies and procedures manual delayed. 'Note that Engineering Admin. and Planning&Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6- Page 12 Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Construction Management (Division 730) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data Target Through 9 Months Target Change Order costs 5% 4.54% Change order costs are always based on a at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four original contract amount quarters. Target has been met. (industry standard=7.25%) Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 45%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a Occupancy in facilities days 55%-240 days running average of the preceding four within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target was not achieved days based on the rolling average utilizing 9 projects. Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 4% Target has been met based on OC Inspections and average no inspections. more 10%correctable deficiencies Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 97% Target has been exceeded. within 20 days greater Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 2 1 1 0 Training task completed one month behind schedule. Section 6- Page 13 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Administration (Division 810) .. Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Ensure Operations $308/million $325/million gallons Exceedence due to lower than anticipated treatment cost per million gallons treated treated flows partially due to dryer winter gallons does not exceed conditions. r target Ensure O&M division 96.100Mo 104.55% (annualized) Annualized target near budgeted budget's managed within expenditures. appropriated expenditures Ensure Total Injury 16.3 11.4 Target met. Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) more below industry average Ensure three-year staffing 206.25 FTEs by 202 FTEs Target met. plan figures are met end of year Workplan Tasks Not 3" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data — 0 0 0 0 Not applicable this quarter. Section 6 - Page 14 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Operations& Maintenance Processing Support (Divisions 8201870') Performance Objective 199mo Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100% Total contracts Natural gas and biosolids hauling expenses biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 107.3%for increased contracts slightly above target. contracts are managed 9-month period within budget (annualized). Ensure milestones are 80%+of Nine 100% Project milestones met. completed on assigned projects Respond to Engineering 90%within 95% Target met. Capital Project Review deadline Requests Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.05 Target met. kilowatt hour($/kWh) Maintain therms/kWh at .111 therms/kWh .106 therms/kWh- Within targeted parameters. Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 (kilowatt hour)within .106 therms/kWh .102 therms/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2 Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 66% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit Central Generation plants requirements. within targeted limits Workplan Tasks Not 3m Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 4 2 2 0 Project delays due to Y2K effort and RFP requirements. *Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6- Page 15 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations (Divisions 8301840) — Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Summary of Data Months Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 73% Plant 1 Target met. Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 72%Plant 2 Process Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 44%Plant 1 Problems related to P1 trickling (BOD) Removal Targets in Primary 43%>at Plant 2 43%Plant 2 filter process areas impacting Treatment Process performance. Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 21% Plant 1 Higher than expected due to total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 27% Plant 2 lower than authorized staffing targets 5 hours leave levels. taken) 25%at Plant 2 Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 3%Plant 1 See above. does not exceed targets salary 3.3%Plant 2 Workplan Tasks Not _ 3" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 3 1 1 1 Delays pending negotiations resolution and the impact of V21K program preparation. Section 6 - Page 16 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 850/860) Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Months Summary of Data Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 43.1% Commitment to project-related activities, Time in Mechanical particularly J-42, reinvention and capital Maintenance Division project support, reduces direct wrench time percentages. Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 42.6% Commitment to project-related activities, Time in Electrical& particularly J-42,reinvention and capital Instrumentation Division project support,reduces direct wrench time percentages. Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 53.3% Time/Direct Support Time See above. in Mechanical Maintenance Division Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54.4% See above. Time/Direct Support Time in Electrical& Instrumentation Division Ensure preventive <90% 74.3% Target met. maintenance backlog in Mechanical Maintenance is less than 100 Ensure preventive <90% 42.2% Target met. maintenance backlog in Electrical&Instrumentation is less than 100% Workplan Tasks Not 3w Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 9 2 3 4 Internal projects related to mapping operational systems have been delayed. Section 6 - Page 17 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Air Quality & Special Projects (Division 880) Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Through Target 9 Months Summary of Data — Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target. deadlines Ensure wllections sulfide 80-100% 77%projected for 12 Performance objective is slightly below control managed within months target. budget Ensure PSA/contractual 80-100% 73%projected for 12 Performance objective is slightly below services managed within months target. budget Workplan Tasks Not — V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. — Section 6- Page 18 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Facilities/Collections Divisions (420/430') Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance Through 9 Summary of Data Months Ensure contractor performs 80%-100%of 66%(458.272 linear Contractor has improved since last quarter within contract guidelines for Zone 7 line cleaning desired linear ft. fl) although still below target. Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 83% Target met. Pump Stations meets or exceeds target Ensure that collections 90%+spots 88% Approaches targeted parameter. trouble spots are cleaned on maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 75% Target exceeded. Fleet Maintenance Division meets or exceeds target Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 73o Target exceeded. Rebuild Shop meets or exceeds target Ensure planned/preventive 75% Planned 8 68%Preventive Corrective work higher than expected maintenance to corrective Preventive 32%Corrective although improvement noted since last maintenance ratios meets Maintenance quarter. targets 25%Corrective Maintenance Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter Complete i Behind Started Summary of Data 6 3 3 0 Delays on tasks project complications related to J-02 needs and CMMS improvement requirements. *Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 6- Page 19 1999-00 Third Quarter Report - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT (Divisions 910193019401950') Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data — Resolve all help desk calls 75%within 3 62% Y2K focus resulted in delays. days Plant radio,PBX and 98%+ 99.97%Radio Target met. Network"Up-time 1000/0 PBX 99.25%Network Database 'Up-time 95%+ 99.86% Target met. Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met.Lms - 'Up-lime plants 100%=Plant 2 Workplan Tasks Not V Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 4 1 1 GIS and seventy console projects slightly behind. `Note that Information Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. — Section 6-Page 20 Orange County Sanitation District (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 3/31/00