HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-24 6May 16, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
i
phone: NOTICE OF MEETING
V 141962-2411
mvlleyayymar BOARD OF DIRECTORS
27
Fountan Valley CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
9272e-9127
sul add.:
100"Ellis Amnue WEDNESDAY, May 24, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
Nun[ain Valley.CA
92709-7018
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Member Fountain Valley, California 92708
Allied.
•
titles The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Perk
Cypress
Faun[ u Va
lley
�
Fullertonrton Zia
Garden Grove BC rd .Secre{�
Huntington Beech
ne
La Habra
to Palma
Loa Alamitos
Newport Batch
Orangenge
Placentia Tentatively - Scheduled Uocomina Meetinas
Bents An
Beal Beach
Brenton
r sun OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 7,2000 at 5:00 p.m.
Nile Park
lbrbe Linda
PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,June 1,2000 at 5:00 p.m.
County or Orange
FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 14,2000 at 5:00 p.m.
sanleary Districts
Coate Ms. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT
Midway city SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,June 19,2000 at 5:00 p.m.QOCWD
Water Districts STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m.
Irvine Rench
'To Protect the Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Myteweter Systems'
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meetina
June June 28, 2000
July *July 19, 2000
August August23, 2000
September September 27, 2000
October October 25, 2000
November *November 15, 2000
December *December20, 2000
January January 24, 2001
February February 28, 2001
March March 28, 2001
April April 25, 2001
May May 23, 2001
*Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month
H1wp.dtalatlmin%BVAgendaU000 Meeting Nofim MN5.2.do
j •, ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: May 24. 2000 TIME: 00 im.
(SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................... —
(FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD..................._� ✓ —
(SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................ v i —
(CRANDALL) ................... CARROZZO.................
(MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER.....................
� C� —
(THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................
� ✓ —
(DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... C —
(MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. ✓ _� —
(PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN...................
_ t —
(GAROFALO)................... GREEN.........................
�G ✓ —
(RYAN)............................. GULLIXSON....................... ✓ —
(BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ry —
(DALY)............................. MC CRACKEN............... . —
(LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. JG ✓ —
(SPURGE ................. MURPHY...................... —
(RIC VAN .. .......... Nam.............. i ✓ —
(FRES ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ ✓
(KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ —
(POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ ✓ —
(SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ ✓ —
(MAULLER)...................... SIGLER......................... ✓ �G —
(SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... �✓ _� —
(MILLER).......................... SWAN...........................
_tL —
(BATES) ........................... SYLVIA..........................
rC �G —
(BLAKE)............................ WALKER.......................
�� —
STAFF: G �
Anderson ✓ ��� /. �, rr.
Ghirelli
Kyle lcbr/X44'r-
Ludwin ✓ .L
Ilens ✓ 0 �4�"" —
Ooten ✓
Tomko ✓
Streed ✓
Tuchman
OTHERS:
Woodruff
Andrus
05/24/00
WadmWstal\wp.dta\admin\BSIDIRECTOR\Dirwtom Roll Call.dw
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
lb e I1!&D BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
�c 1w PF
e� C S
H:%WP.DTAUWlN %FORM=lGN-IN FORW.
Summary of Little Hoover Commission Report on
Special District Operations
a
C.7 p
May 22, 2000
OCSD!P.O.Box 6127!Founlaln Valley,CA 9272841127!(714)962d411
Introduction
The following white paper provides the Orange County Sanitation District staff s
interpretation of the Little Hoover Commission's report on Special Districts:Relics of the
Past or Resources for the Future? This report,published in May 2000,details the
Commission's findings on Special District operations. The report delineates information
under five separate findings.
The attached report duplicates the Little Hoover Commission's findings and provides our
summary discussion. The report is formatted as follows:
• Finding
• Recommendation
• OCSD Interpretation of Finding
• Impact of Findings/Recommendations on OCSD
We hope the information provided herein proves useful. If you wish to obtain the full
Little Hoover Commission Report please contact the Communications Department or
access the document via the Internet at www.ihc.ca.gov/lhc.html.
' Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts— White Paper Summary
Finding 1: Special districts are often invisible to the public and policy-makers,
compromising oversight and accountability.
Recommendation 1: The Governor and Legislature should enact legislation that would
make special districts more visible and accountable. Specifically,the legislation should:
• Require special districts to actively make their activities visible to the public.
• Require special districts to submit information to other local governments.
• Encourage special district elections to be held as part of even year general elections.
OCSD Interpretation of Findings
The Commission believes that because special districts are of a single purpose,providing
one specific service such as water, sanitation or fire protection, much of the public
doesn't realize that these entities are indeed "governments." As such, the traditional
oversight and accountability mechanisms, including public meetings and financial
reporting,have not been effective in promoting the kind of"rigorous examination
required of democratic institutions." This results, according to the Commission, in a lack
of public participation, local-govemment oversight and agency accountability.
Impact of LHC Findings/Recommendation on OCSD
One of the recommendations of this Finding is to"require special districts to submit
information to other local governments." This recommendation has no impact on the
Sanitation District, which is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of 25 elected
officials representing the 21 cities in our service area,two local sanitary districts,one
water district, and a representative of the County's Board of Supervisors. In addition, the
Sanitation District has been praised for its longstanding outreach program to local and
state elected officials, the general public, as well as specific target audiences including
environmentalists, regulators,city public works staffs, and educators. The following is a
list of the outreach programs conducted during the past five-year period:
• The Rate Advisory Committee(RAC)and the Planning Advisory Committee
(PAC)—Comprised of representatives from homeowners associations,
environmental groups,regulators,city government, and business and industry,
the RAC and PAC played a major role in our three-year Strategic Planning
effort. Their recommendations for a more "fair and equitable rate structure"
and for wastewater treatment options to meet the growing needs of Orange
County were brought before our Board of Directors. The Board carefully
considered those recommendations,incorporating them into the 1999
Strategic Plan.
• Legislators Day—This special event has been held biannually to keep federal,
state and local elected officials apprised of the latest Sanitation District
programs and developments.
• Special Programs for City Managers and Public Works Staff—At least once
annually the Sanitation District holds a meeting for this specific group to
Little Hoover Commissian Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary
discuss infrastructure issues, including best management practices and
associated costs for maintaining the County's 12,000 miles of sewer lines.
• Outreach to the Media—In addition to personal telephone calls made to the
media to apprise them of District developments, both of the County's major
newspapers receive all Board committee and regular meeting agenda
packages.
• Tours and Special Presentations—More than 1,000 visitors tour the Sanitation
District annually. Each of these individuals receives an information packet
that includes financial data. In addition,the Sanitation District has made its
facilities available to the Council of Governments and to LAFCO for their
meetings.
• Orange County Fair—For nearly a decade the Sanitation District has
maintained a booth at the Orange County Fair, which is attended by hundreds
of thousands of guests annually. Employees staffing the booth are specially
trained and available to answer the public's questions.District financial data is
also distributed.
• Internet web site—The Sanitation District maintains a comprehensive Web
site that includes extensive financial data. In the past nine months, nearly
7,000 individuals have visited the site.
In addition to the above,the District receives hundreds of calls annually from the public
requesting general information. Staff is always available to answer those questions.
Finding 2: Local Agency Formation Commissions, by not aggressively scrutinizing the
organization of specific districts, have failed to promote the efficient and effective
evolution of local government.
Recommendation 2: The State should provide LAFCOs with the direction and
resources necessary to make them a catalyst for the effective and efficient evolution of
independent special districts. Specifically, the Governor and Legislature should:
• Require periodic and specific reviews of independent special districts.
• Enhance the independence of LAFCOs.
• Require shared funding of LAFCOs (e.g. special district and city participation).
• Require special districts subject to study to pay for the study.
OCSD Interpretation of Findings
The Little Hoover Commission was forthcoming in their review of LAFCOs and their
widespread failure to accomplish specific elements of their Mission—specifically the
examination of special district agencies and reorganization or consolidation related
thereto. In a three-year period,LAFCOs throughout the state initiated only 18
reorganization studies of special districts of which only one resulted in actual elimination
of a special district. The Commission recognized that external factors were significant
contributors to LAFCO's failures in the special district area. These included: 1)
Permissive and vague State policy, 2)Lack of LAFCO independence from county
2
Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Disuicts—White Paper Summary
influence,3)Inadequate funding of LAFCOs,and 4)The organizational/political
structure of many LAFCOs. By resolving these problems through the recommendations
noted above, the Commission believed LAFCOs could be efficient,effective and
independent bodies capable of accomplishing its mission. Interestingly,the Commission
on Local Governance in the 21'Century had very similar observations relative to
LAFCOs. They too believed that LAFCOs needed to be re-engineered to be effective
participants in government reform. Although the various recommendations should bring
about desired changes,it will be difficult, as implied in the little Hoover Commission's
report, to implement them without state mandate. The recommendations noted require
both fiscal sacrifice and shifts in political power. Because of this,implementation
without state legislation will only occur on a sporadic basis.
Impact of LAC FindingsMocommendation on OCSD
The impact on OCSD is uncertain,though likely not detrimental,if the recommendations
above are implemented. Orange County LAFCO and the District have cooperated in the
past in consolidation of our various districts into one organization. The District fairs well
in comparison to most special district organizations and very likely would not be the
target of dissolution based on the Commission's proposed guidelines for organizational
review. Rather,if consolidation efforts were undertaken by Orange County LAFCO,it
is quite probable OCSD would be considered a parent agency able to absorb the
responsibilities of other smaller districts with similar missions.
What is more likely in the shorter term is a requirement for the Sanitation District to pay
annual fees to support the LAFCO organization.Special districts throughout Orange
County could be obligated to fund one-third of OCLAFCO's net operating budget
(approximately$500,000 in FY M99). OCSD's share would be a small proportion of
that one-third. This would be calculated as the percentage our operating budget
represents compared to the sum total of all operating budgets for the special districts in
Orange County(of which there are 29). Note that this formula is just a preliminary
suggestion by the Commission on Local Governance in the 20 Century and is certainly
subject to modification. Other,though improbable,fiscal impacts that may transpire are
associated with LAFCO auditing OCSD. If the recommendations above are mandated,
then the District would be obligated to pay for such an audit with costs ranging from
$50,000 to$100,000 dependent upon scope of work.
Finding 3: Policy-makers and community leaders lack the analytical tools necessary to
assess the benefits of consolidation,impeding their ability to advocate effectively for
change and overcome the tenacity of the status quo.
Recommendation 3: To equip policy-makers and the public with the tools necessary to
assess and guide the organization of independent special districts,the Governor and
Legislature should establish a program at the California Policy Research Center,or
similar institute,to do the following:
• Develop guidelines and protocols for special district consolidations.
3
Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary
• Study the long-term outcomes of consolidations and reorganizations.
• Establish a cadre of trainers to assist LAFCOs and their staff.
• Develop performance measures at the special district level that are meaningful to
constituents.
OCSD Interpretation of Findings
According to the Commission's report, policy-makers and community leaders need the
appropriate analytical tools to be able to assess local government performance and
identify opportunities for reorganizations based on this empirical evidence. It was
indicated that LAFCOs are generally lacking in such expertise—both in guidelines and
protocols establishing WHEN and HOW special district consolidation audits should take
place as well as WHAT is the outcome,based on sound analysis,of consolidations once
they occur. In brief, many LAFCOs apparently lack either the technical expertise and/or
analytical staff to perform these functions. According to the Commission's report,
"Lacking reliable data to support reorganization proposals,LAFCOs and community
leaders find themselves at a disadvantage to the politically and emotionally charged
forces that often align in defense of the status quo." Without the capability to conduct
thorough analysis, and absent a robust set of metrics to measure efficiency, effectiveness
and service quality, LAFCOs will continue to struggle to accomplish their core mission.
Impact of LHC Findings%ecommendation on OCSD
There is no impact to our District related to these particular issues. As previously stated,
LAFCO was provided more than sufficient analytical data,developed by District staff,to
support consolidation of our various districts. Furthermore, OCSD is widely recognized
as having some of the best financial,operational and administrative data that allows us to
be benchmarked against other special districts.
Finding 4: Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi-million dollar
reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional or statewide
infrastructure planning.
Recommendation 4: The Governor and Legislature should enact policies that will
ensure prudent management of special district reserve funds and incorporate these
resources into regional and statewide infrastructure planning. Specifically, the State
should require:
• Districts to publicize their reserves.
• Policymakers to integrate enterprise district reserve information into infrastructure
planning.
• Guidelines for pmdent reserves.
4
Link Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts- vatte paper Summary
OCSD Interpretation of Findings
The LHC Report categorizes special districts as dependent or independent and as
enterprise or non-enterprise. Generally, independent special districts have elected boards
or are not governed by a city council or county. Enterprise special districts are those that
can levy fees for service. Thus,OCSD is an independent enterprise special district. The
LHC reports that at June 30, 1997,enterprise special districts held retained earnings of
$18.2 billion,while non-enterprise special districts held fund balances totaling$1.2
billion. Thus the focus of the report is upon enterprise special districts.
The LHC Report makes the terms retained earnings,fund balance and reserves equal,and
then implies that all three are synonymous with cash. This is incorrect. The report
correctly states that retained earnings are the difference between revenue and
expenditures. However, it fails to consider that purchases or construction of assets are
not considered an expenditure under the rules of accounting. Clearly revenues applied to
asset accumulation also increase retained earnings, but they do not increase cash. It is
safe to assume that the actual cash balances of enterprise special districts are much less
than the$18.2 billion retained earnings reported. This accounting error should not
distract us from the sense of the report's findings and recommendations,but it is an
important technicality that must be addressed and kept in mind while reviewing the
report. For example, the report states that"reserves of many enterprise special districts
are growing, indicating that revenue may be exceeding the cost of providing service."
Whether reserves means cash or retained earnings may make this statement acceptable or
just plain wrong. Even if cash and retained earnings were the same,this statement
reflects a very short-term view of the"cost of providing service."
Commission Conclusions
Some reserves appear unreasonably Iarae. This conclusion seems to be based upon poor
understanding of the existence and purpose of reserves. Of course,this observation could
have been tempered if they had reviewed the actual cash balances.
District resources are not integrated into infrastructure planning. The LHC observed that
special districts are not required to participate in the development of county or city
general plans or to cooperate and coordinate their activities with neighboring local
governments. They concluded that special district finances and activities are thus often
unknown to other policymakers and not integrated in local,regional or state infrastructure
planning and financing. While acknowledging that special districts play an impartial role
in providing infrastructure, the LHC asks if they should ever be eligible for State help
considering their large financial resources.
Special district reserves are obscure. Financial reporting rules do not require information
to be presented in ways that provide for the public or policymakers to understand or
scrutinize how districts use public funds in general, and reserves in particular. The report
itself proves this point.
5
Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts- a to Paper Summary
There are no guidelines for prudent reserves. The LHC talked to 10 enterprise districts
that rank in their top 25 among enterprise districts for retained earnings. Five reported
they had reserve policies and 5 reported they did not. Among those that had policies,
there is a wide variation in what is considered appropriate.
Implementing the Recommendation
Develop solutions to particular problems. Where abuses or excesses are identified,the
first and preferable alternative is for community leaders and district officials to work
together to resolve problems. Solutions should include implementation of policies for the
prudent accumulation and use of reserves.
Determining and reauirine prudent reserves. The LHC reviewed guidelines from the
Government Finance Officers Association,the League of California Cities, the
International City Managers Association,several cities and special districts,and found no
consistent principles. They suggest a complete survey of reserve policies and practices in
order to develop benchmarks and to facilitate discussions.
Making reserves variable. The biggest problem with reserves is that the public and
policymakers do not know about them. Information should be easily accessible, and
routinely provided. Reserve purposes and amounts should be clearly identified and
explained in financial reports tailored to the needs of the public and policymakers.
Integrating reserve information in infrastructure planning. Some districts have been
criticized for impeding effective regional planning and have exempted themselves
fiscally and programmatically from the process. It may be possible to apply some district
reserves to regional infrastructure needs if all parties involved are knowledgeable and
communicating. This cooperation may be enhanced by boundary changes,consolidations
or reassigning responsibilities.
Existing OCSD Policy(Practice/Experience/Plans
In 1997, the OCSD retained Public Financial Management to review our long-standing
reserve policy and to propose revisions as appropriate. A part of this work involved a
survey of 24 public wastewater,water and utility agencies. The results were summarized
and benchmarks were developed. The result was a revised reserves policy which was
reviewed and approved by the FAHR Committee in May of 1998. Since adoption, this
policy has been included in every budget document,comprehensive annual report,and
budget presentation. It was also presented to the RAC and PAC during the Strategic Plan
preparation process.
The policy establishes 5 categories of reserves:
• Insurance/Liability Reserve is intended to address the full range of general and
extraordinary liabilities,as well as earthquake, Flood and fire damage. The District
6
Leak Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary
has fairly high deductibles and only moderate amounts of insurance in order to
contain costs. The probable maximum total loss to the Plants from a 7.5 earthquake
is estimated at$495 million. The target amount for this reserve category is $57
million.
• Cash flow/Contingency Reserve is made up of the sum of 1)six months of total
operating costs,plus 2) 10%of operating costs,plus 3)the August COP service
payments. Because the District's user fees and taxes are collected on the property tax
bill, we receive very little income during the first six months of the year. Funds must
be on hand at the beginning of the year to meet requirements during this funding dry-
period.
• Capital Projects Reserve are to pay for additions, improvements and rehabilitation to
the$1.4 billion sewerage system. The District has implemented a 50:50 mix of pay-
as-you-go and debt financing for capital improvements. The average annual capital
improvement budget for 1998 to 2020 was$82 million, so a reserve level of$41
million was targeted.
• Short-term Specific Capital Projects Reserves was established for projects that would
be in progress before the next COP issue. Even though we have a 50:50 pay-as-you-
go policy, the last new money COP issue was in 1992. The next new money issue is
scheduled for 2000. All projects in the intervening years were paid for from reserves.
The LHC reports that the League of California Cities does not include these types of
accumulated funds as reserves. A target of$122 million was established for this
category,equal at the time to our estimated share of the GWRS.
• Renewal/Replacement Reserve was a new category established after a consultant's
review of our existing fixed assets and development of a rehabilitation and
replacement schedule and computer model. The FAHR Committee reviewed the
model and adopted a policy in May 1998. Basically,30%of annual
renewal/replacement needs will be funded from these reserves. The initial balance in
this reserve was established at$50 million,to be augmented annually from user fees.
• Rate Stabilization Reserves account for the balance of accumulated funds. No target
was established for this category. All funds in this reserve are available for use in the
subsequent year and are used to reduce fluctuations in the annual user fee rates caused
mainly by changing capital program needs.
• Debt Service Reserves are sometimes required for long-term borrowing. Typically
these are funded in an amount equal to 10%of the amount borrowed. These funds
are controlled by Trustee Banks for the issue and are intended to assure the lenders
that at least one annual payment would be made while a new financial plan was
developed in case of a fiscal crises. The current requirement for these reserves is$33
million.
7
Little Hooper Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary
Impact of LHC Findings/Recommendation on OCSD
The OCSD seems to have complied with all of the requirements or facets of"prudent
management of special district reserve funds."
We have publicized our reserves and policy through the budget,the CAFR,our website
and the Strategic Plan process. We have shared our policy and reserve balances with
each of the cities,the county and several special districts in our service area through the
Directors,through meetings with staff,through the cooperative projects program,and
through the Strategic Plan process. We have adopted a simple,easy to understand
reserves policy, and we repeat it in nearly every publication.
One of the factors not considered,or included,in the LHC report is the use of cash and
investment reserves to offset the interest rate risk associated with variable rate borrowing.
The District has been very successful in reducing long-term borrowing costs through this
practice. Because most of our investments are required to be relatively short-term,our
interest earnings increase when our interest expense increase. In this way we also always
have funds available for principal and interest payments. Additionally,the rating
agencies have been very impressed with our financial stability and management, and our
ability to retire the variable rate COPs, if needed,and have rewarded us with a high credit
rating, which will also reduce the cost of borrowing. Our outstanding variable rate debt
balance is $174 million.
Finding 5: Property tax allocations to some enterprise districts create inequities among
districts and distort the true costs of services. A significant portion of the property tax
allocated to all enterprise districts subsidizes districts with the highest reserves.
Recommendation 5: Policymakers should scrutinize the appropriateness of maintaining
property tax allocations to enterprise districts. Among the alternatives are:
• Annually review the level of property tax support.
• Examine all allocations to enterprise districts.
• Require a State audit of some districts(those with high reserves who receive
property taxes).
• Allow counties to reclaim and reallocate property tax revenues.
• Enhance public understanding of property tax allocation.
OCSD Interpretation of Findings
According to the LHC report,enterprise special districts like us received$421 trillion in
property tax revenues in 1996-97. Of that amount 36%or$103 million went to 15
districts that also had some of the largest reserves. Our property tax receipts for that year
were$28 million. To the LHC there are two problems: first,enterprise districts can levy
fees for service while other districts cannot; second,districts that may have considerable
resources are"subsidized"by property taxes.
8
Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary
Prior to the 1978 passage of Proposition 13, special districts like other agencies
established annual property tax rates to meet their needs and philosophies. Subsequent to
Proposition 13, they can no longer do that; a share of the 1%basic levy is allocated by
law based upon actual tax levies for 1975-78. Current need does not affect this allocation
and the district cannot change it. About half of the enterprise special districts receive
some share of the property tax allocation,while 78%of the wastewater special districts
receive property taxes. The OCSD average allocation is 2.8% of the 1% basic levy,but it
varies by tax rate area and by city.
Many studies of state and local government finance have considered property tax
allocations,but consensus on solutions has been elusive.
• California Constitution Revision Commission recommended each county form a
citizen charter commission to allocate the non-school portion of the property tax.
• Commission on Governance for the 21st Century suggested that"future government
reformers may wish to consider reallocating a portion of property tax revenues
currently accruing to enterprise districts . . "
• Speaker's Commission on State and Local Government Finance recommended that
property tax revenues be reported to the public by a state agency or by county
auditors.
• Senate Committee on Local Government identified property tax allocations to
enterprise special districts as one of four policy issues for 2000.
• Legislative Analyst was directed by the Legislature to identify alternatives for
restructuring the property tax allocation. The Legislative Analyst noted that the
current allocations are based on 25-year old formulas that do not reflect today's
needs, that there is a tension between special purpose agencies and general purpose
governments, and that allocating taxes to enterprise special districts may have
discouraged them from evolving to user fees.
Existing OCSD Policy/PracticelExpenence/Future Plans
Except in Revenue Areas 13 and 14, the OCSD receives a share of the 1%basic levy
property tax. This percentage averages approximately 2.8%but varies considerably. We
have no taxes for GO Bonds.
The total property tax budget for 1999-2000 was$32 million. In 1991,the Board
adopted a policy of dedicating property tax receipts to COP service. The budgeted COP
service for 1999-2000, excluding a proposed new issue,was$31 million.
9
Little Hoover Commission Report on Special Districts—White Paper Summary j
Impact of LHC Recommendation on OCSD
While the recommendation calls for property taxes to be "scrutinized,"the intent seems
to be to reduce or eliminate property tax allocations to enterprise special districts,
especially those with large reserves.
There is a current Legislative effort,AB 1396,directed at property tax revenue. Our
understanding is that the chair of the conference committee, Senator Peace,has opened
the discussion with a call for a"blank piece of paper" approach.
If property taxes are diverted from the District, it would take a$38 increase in the annual
SFR user fee to replace the lost revenues.
If the lost property taxes were not replaced, the reserve balances would eventually be
reduced to unsafe levels,perhaps to zero. In that case,the interest income would
correspondingly decrease. In order to replace the lost interest income, the Single-Family
Resident(SRF) user fee would need to be increased an additional $32 per year.
The combined annual fee increase to recover lost property taxes and interest would be an
87% increase,or$70 per year.
10
i
4_
Orange I I^^
y
Pacteding the public health and the er
While Professional Secretaries Day was
celebrated in April,we just couldn't let the
occasion go by without honoring one of
our own hardworking, behind-the-
scenes individuals. And so,the May
E m I o e e Spotlight shines on Laurie von
V Winckelmann, secretary for the w V,
p / Source Control division of the ,,.{
Technical Services Department.
Spotlight - =
Laurie, a native Californian, was born t'."�
at St. Joseph's Hospital in the City of I
Laurie von Orange. She was raised in Fountain tl
Valley and attended Los Amigos High
School. After graduation, she decided to
Winckelmann attend court-reporting college. While there,
Administrative afriend(Ron Wade's wife, Alison)told her
about a job opening at the District. Laurie decided
Assistant to toss her stenograph machine in favor of a steno pad and apply for the position.
Division 640 She was hired in August 1985 as a clerk in the Industrial Waste division(now
Source Control). In 1988, she was promoted to secretary and currently reports to
Mahin Talebi. Laurie's lob duties include supporting our NPDES reporting require-
ment efforts such as the annual report,the semi-annual report and local limits,
which go to the EPA and to the Regional Board. She also supports the 35 staff
members in her division.
inside:
Laurie is married and has two children-Trevor, 6 and Ashley, 2. Laurie met her
Huntington Beach husband, Mike von Winckelmann, right here at the District in May 1990. Mike
Dye Study continued on page 6
Security Survey How Do 1 Love Thee?
Results So far,we've had 42 attempts and it some element of luck enabled us to
Bob Oaten shows no sign of stopping. ride this one out.
CWEA President 2000
Staving on Thursday, May 4,the According to Patrick Miles, "Security
Injection Well Internet virus ILOVEYOU started to is a constantly moving target. We all
Project at Plant No. t replicate around the world. It is need to do our part." Remember the
acknowledged as the fastest-spreading following rules-of-thumb:
Information Technology virus ever. It spreads using Outlook
Road Map addresses with an enticing subject. • If you receive any suspicious attach-
How can you resist a love letter? Click, ments, delete them. Don't take a
First Annual bang you're infected and spreading it to chance.
OC Trash Bash the people in your address book. • Do not download any executables.
You could be asking for trouble.
CWEA "Best Engineering The District was unaffected. Anti-virus • When in doubt, call the IT Help Desk
9 g software is in place that screens every for assistance.
Wastewater Project" e-mail attachment for infection. If any
is found, the attachment is cleaned or If you have any questions, please
OC Fair Update removed and the involved people are contact any member of the Information
notified. Good planning, execution and Technology Team. NP
Diego(41/2 years of service) Michelle accepted
a position as vice president of NCG
Porter Novell,a large public affairs firm
with an offlice in Orange County(Irvine).
They also have offices in San
in Sacramento.
Spotlight-continued from page We're Spicin' it up!
works in the Microbiology section of _ _ t
00 `c'cz F
the Lab. "During a Department meet-
ing,
we were all asked to stand up and - � ` L � p O
introduce the person next to us," t' ig
recalled Laurie. "Mike was sitting
behind me and had to introduce Mad E Volunteer to Work
Kogan. After he finished the introduc-
tion and sat down, I turned around, ��flll at the Fair
boldly grabbed his notebook, and wrote Things are really heating up as the
'nice job.' Then, I turned sideways in date draws nearer for this ear's
my chair to get his attention." _ _ Orange County Fair,which starts July
Laurie went so far as to assign scouts `-' 14 and runs till July 30. Be on the
to inform her of Mike's whereabouts, lookout for volunteer sign-up sheets
so she could "accidentally" bump into that will be sent to everyone by e-mail.
him. "I just thought he was s0000 The whole von Winkelmann family Christmas If you'd like to volunteer for one or
cute,"she admitted. Well, Mike finally 1999-Laurie,Trevor,Ashley and M a. more shifts to help staff the District's
booth at the fair,fill out the form and
got the hint and asked her to have
Laurie and Mike are currently remod- submit it to Rosa McArthur
lunch with him. After dating for two eling and re-landscaping their house in (McArthurrl@aol.comi, who is in
years, Mike proposed. "One day in Huntington Beach. For relaxation, they charge of scheduling OCSD employee
January after we had dinner, Mike love to go camping in their travel trailer. work shifts at the fair. If you do not
asked me to go for a walk along the One of their favorite camping vacations receive a sign-up sheet or have any
Balboa boardwalk. He was walking was a two-week trip to Yellowstone other questions, you can also contact
very fast and was almost dragging me National Parkin Wyoming. Ingrid Hellebrand at ext.7115.
along behind him. I was wearing high
heels and couldn't figure out why he "It's nice to have a job where you can There are plenty of benefits for
was in such a hurry,"said Laurie. "He still spend quality time with your representing the District at the fair.
finally stopped on the right side of the family,"said Laurie. "The people make All employees that work at least one
pier next to(where else?(one of the the lob. I really love working here." shift at the fair will receive a free
District's sampling points. He pulled a
box out of his pocket and said, 'Oh, Laurie von Winckelmann...u beat. T-shirt designed especially for this
what's this? Why don't you open it?'" p year's fair. You will also be invited
positive, and with a smile that could to the post-fair luncheon party at the
When she did, she found a ring inside. brighten anyone's day. You're right, Claim Jumper restaurant on August 8.
They have been married for nearly eight Laurie. It is the people who make the
years and are still having fun, even job. You area shining example to us all And there's more... employees who
though their jobs and family keep them and you have truly learned the meaning work during their non-working hours
extremely busy. of teamwork-for you practice it every will receive one raffle ticket for each
day. NP non-working hour worked. Increase
your chances of winning some of the
over thirty fabulous prizes that will be
IDEA AWARDS` raffled off at the post-fair party by
C would _ to recognize the volunteering for more non-working
recipients of_ aEA Awards ... Congratulations! hour shifts.
Look for more details on bulletin
Bill Aldridge Pedestrian Crosswalk Safety 03/30/00 boards in your area. A fair entertain-
Tracey Murphy Primary Basins 3,4 8 5 Launder Level Alarms/Indicators 04/03/00 ment schedule and a sample of the
William Wallin Belt Press Fail Safe Rewiring 04/19/00 T-shirt design will also be posted.
Additional T-shirts will be available
for purchase at a great price! NP
h Mv/1WJ 1The News P,hm wnv,CCSasem _ _
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District to be held on d y 24 was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on.(7 _ /� , 2U��.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this "day of
zodd.
Penny M. Kyle, Secrete
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
11RADOWDATA7\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC
a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
Board Secretary
May 17, 2000
Phan.:
(714)962-2411
awaw.w .aa; To the Chair and Members
Po. Box B127 of the Board of Directors
Fountain Valley.G
92728-8127 Subject: Board Letter
sense add.:
18644 Elbs Avenue
Faunae,Valle,CA
92708-7018 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
information on any of the items, please call me.
Annual Financial Report and Julie Matsumoto Win Awards!
Mamter
Agencies
• The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been
cities awarded to the Orange County Sanitation District by the Government Finance
Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive
Anona;m annual financial report (CAFR) published for the year ended June 30, 1999. The
ere.
euene Park Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of
Cypress governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a
Fountain money significant accomplishment b a government and its management. This is the sixth
Fullerton Valley
9 P Y 9 9
Gordan G.ra consecutive year the District has received this award. An Award of Financial
Handngron Beach lrwne Reporting Achievement has also been awarded by GFOA to Julie Matsumoto as the
L.Habra primary staff person responsible for preparing the District's award-winning CAFR.
L. Palma
Los rr acon B
Newport
Greacn
anga CASA Meets in San Diego
A.canub
$.ea A.
seal tease CASA(California Association of Sanitation Agencies) held its spring conference in
st,nan San Diego May 4-6. A highlight of the meeting was a presentation by Mr. Richard
Van Perk Terzian, Chairman of the Little Hoover Commission, on the findings contained in the
roroe Linda Commission's May 2000 Report titled Special Districts: Relics of the Past or
count, or orange Resources for the Future? The report calls for improved public involvement and
scrutiny in the operations of special districts and more vigorous review of the
sanitary Districts resources and reserves held by special districts. The report will be considered next
by the joint legislative Conference Committee on AB 1936 (Villaraigosa)that is
costa mesa considering local government finance reform. CASA, along with other association
midway cry lobbyists, are engaged in the discussions surrounding this effort, and we will keep
Water Districts you informed as the committee deliberations progress. Further information about the
trine Raneh report and other CASA happenings are contained in the CASA Executive Director's
Report by Mike Dillon (copy attached).
'To Protect the Pudic Heats end the Eneironmen,txwtgh Excellence in ULNeteweter Syareme"
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 2
May 17, 2000
Composition and Distribution of Beach Debris in Orange Court
For decades, beach debris has been recognized as both an aesthetic and ecological
problem. In response, local environmental and civic groups conduct organized beach
clean-up days. In addition, beach cities actively carry out routine beach clean-up
activities using large mechanized equipment. However, these clean-up efforts
usually focus on larger debris and trash. The Southern California Coastal Research
Project (SCCW RP) recently conducted the first systematic study of Orange County
beach debris. Using a statistically rigorous sampling protocol, SCCW RP analyzed 43
sites from Seal Beach to San Clemente during August and September 1998.
SCCW RP found:
♦ More than 106 million items, weighing approximately 13 tons.
♦ This amount exceeded the amount of debris collected for the entire state
during the 1998 California Coastal Cleanup Day and was 50 times more than
the debris collected in Orange County. This difference was attributed to the
focus on large debris items during these coastal clean-up efforts.
Plastic was the most abundant debris found. "Nerdles"(pre-production plastic
used to manufacture finished plastic products)was the most abundant item
found overall. Nerdles were found after sieving the sand and are believed to
get to the beach from stormwater runoff and offshore shipping sources.
• Remote low-use rocky shorelines, in general, had more debris than high-use
sandy beaches. This indicates that waterbome sources, boats for example,
are the primary source of this debris.
♦ SCCW RP identified four major pathways: (1) littering by beach goers; (2)wind
transport from inland areas; (3)water transport from inland areas; and (4)
overboard disposal from boating activities.
Both federal and state water quality agencies have been evaluating regulations
related to trash and debris. The results of SCCW RP's study are already finding their
way into this regulatory arena. The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control
Board, for example, has proposed "trash TMDLs" in 11 water bodies to control the
amount of trash and debris entering the region's waterways and coastal waters. It is
uncertain at this time whether other regional boards, including the Santa Ana region,
will adopt trash TMDLs.
oq..
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 3
May 17. 2000
Biosolids Update
On March 28, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance that
banned the use of all forms of biosolids, including Exceptional Quality biosolids
compost. On May 5, the first reading of the biosolids ordinance was delayed for 60
days. Apparently the delay was caused by Imperial County counsel not providing the
requested changes to the language in the ordinance in time to be heard at the May 5
Board of Supervisors' meeting. Increased pressure and threats of litigation from
producers of Exceptional Quality biosolids may also be contributing to this delay.
On April 24, Senate Bill 1956 was scheduled to be voted on by the Senate
Environmental Quality Committee. Unfortunately, the bill was pulled at the author's
request due to the fact that the State Water Resources Control Board's (SW RCB)
Statewide General Order biosolids regulation had not been finalized prior to the
Committee meeting. This bill, being based on the SW RCB Statewide General Order,
was determined to be premature for the purpose of proceeding through the legislative
process. Senate Bill 1956 would have resulted in the adoption of a statewide,
science-based, uniform regulation for the land application of biosolids in California.
The bill would have preempted local control over biosolids recycling unless the local
regulation is based on substantial, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence that shows an
unreasonable adverse effect would exist on the environment or public health within
the local jurisdiction. The bill generated outrage in the agricultural community and
was actively opposed by numerous agricultural interests. The author has requested
that a hearing on the science related to biosolids recycling be scheduled this fall for
the Senate Environmental Quality Committee.
In Kern County, the Yakima Company has decided to rescind its application for a
Conditional Use Permit for a proposed composting facility in western Kern County.
After several community meetings and numerous discussions with Kern County
officials, the Yakima Company believes that relocating the facility to another site in
the San Joaquin valley would be prudent. The District's contract with the Yakima
Company for biosolids composting specifically at the previously proposed composting
site is in the process of being rescinded.Attached for your review is an article that
recently appeared in the Bakersfield Californian on this subject along with several
other biosolids-related articles.
On May 1. Synagro Technologies, Inc. (one of the District's four biosolids
management contractors)announced that it has entered into a stock purchase
agreement to acquire the Bid Gro business from Waste Management, Inc. (another
of the District's biosolids management contractors). Synagro will maintain Bid Gro's
status as a leader in providing biosolids management services. Synagro is the fastest
growing company focused on biosolids management services, and has operations
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 4
May 17, 2000
located throughout the country.The acquisition should be completed by June 30,
2000. This acquisition will reduce the diversity of the District's biosolids management
program only in the number of service providers.
On May 10, Blake Anderson and Mike Moore met with Kings County Supervisor Jon
Ratchford to discuss biosolids issues in Kings County. Blake made a commitment
that the District will be strong environmental stewards of the land that the District just
purchased in Kings County. Blake also stated that the District will comply with not
only the letter but also the spirit of the Kings County biosolids ordinance that is
expected to be adopted in the next few months.
Blake Anderson was a guest speaker at the Great Valley Center's annual regional
conference, "Our Place in the World 3 -Central Valley Mosaic" held in Sacramento
on May 11. He was a panelist discussing"Biosolids: Local Bane or Boon?" Blake's
presentation entitled 'The Case for Biosolids in Agriculture"presented a holistic
approach on biosolids recycling from agricultural products, to markets, to consumers,
and back to agriculture. He highlighted biosolids issues related to product quality,
public policy, business sense, crop productivity, regulatory requirements, and public
perception concerns.
Santa Ana River Watershed Group Annual Meeting
In the event you missed the hard copy, attached is the Program and Registration
Form for the 2ntl Annual Santa Ana River Watershed Planning Meeting scheduled for
Thursday-Friday, June 1-2 at the Ontario DoubleTree Hotel (the meeting is being
managed by the Urban Water Institute). Thursday afternoon will focus on a scoping
of efforts in the Watershed (the Organics Center, Water Supply and Quality,
Conservation and Urban Transition, and Watershed Partnerships). Dinner Thursday
night will celebrate the progress that has been made on a number of initiatives in the
watershed. The Friday session is for the Group to report to the broader constituency
of people in the watershed. If you are interested in attending the meeting, please
contact Jean Tappan at 714 593-7101 and she will make the arrangements for you.
Proposed/Pending Legislation: Directors Compensation—SB 1559
At the request and urging of the Board of Directors and with the support and
assistance of CASA, legislation was introduced last year to provide for an
authorization to increase director's fees/compensation. The bill proceeded through
the committees and both houses of the legislature without any meaningful opposition.
The bill was passed but vetoed by Governor Davis.
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 5
May 17, 2000
The proposal has been resubmitted during the current session of the Legislature and
again is proceeding through committees without opposition. The bill is slightly
different than last year to address the Governor's objections to the rate of pay per
meeting.
The CASA Legislative lobbyist advises me that the author(Senator David Kelley, San
Diego) is now very confident of enactment with approval of the Governor signing in
into law.
The bill does not have the Legislature increase the rate of pay for District Directors,
but rather delegates authority to the Board of Directors of each local agency to
establish the amount of fees to be paid for days of service.
OCSD City and Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey for FV `98-99
The Collection Facilities O&M Division is responsible for the daily operation and
maintenance of the regional wastewater conveyance system upstream of the two
Treatment Facilities, in accordance with our NPDES Permit. OCSD is not
responsible, however, for the daily operation, maintenance, planning, and
rehabilitation of the regional "satellite systems"owned and operated by the OCSD
Member Cities and Sewering Agencies.
In the fall of 1997, District staff created a strategic goal to develop a Collection
System O&M Outreach Program with the Member Cities and Agencies. The outreach
effort uses survey forms and focused meetings to interface with each member's staff.
The goals were to become more knowledgeable of the assets managed by others,
leverage expertise, and promote improved networking among system
owner/operators. Annually, OCSD staff develops a questionnaire in the fall,
schedules and conducts meetings with the Member Cities and Sewering Agencies
thru the winter, and produces a final report in the spring. Meeting times range from
forty-five minutes to three hours plus travel time for the OCSD team.
Each Director will receive a copy of the report. Copies will also be sent to the
participating satellite system operators and the city or agency manager. We are also
developing an electronic version of the database that should be up and running in the
next twelve months. Our goal is to provide all participants the capability to sort,
compile and utilize the data in a paperless format.
We expect to distribute the first copies at the June OMTS Committee Meeting.
We thank the city and agency staffs for participating. Feedback we receive continues
to support the fact that time is well spent on this value added effort.
Members of the Board of Directors
Page 6
May 17, 2000
Any questions: contact Nick Amontes at 714 593-7210 or by e-mail at
narhontesCocsd.com
Monthly Odor Complaints Report
The monthly report on odor complaints is included in the attachments. It breaks
down the calls received by location—Plant 1, Plant 2 or Collections System.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Blake P. Anderson
General Manager
BPA:jt
N:1WP OTAU MIMAMLLETTERS TO THE BOPA09T-0521 DCC
Attachments
CASA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
May 5, 2000
By Mike Dillon
I. IT'S"WATCH AND WAIT"IN AN ELECTION YEAR
Sacramento lobbyists and the Capitol press corps spent the fast few months of the new
millennium waiting for work to commence for the 2000 legislative session. A few measures
were hold-overs from the previous session,which needed to adhere to legislative deadlines at the
end of January. However,for the most part,the legislature grinded to a halt during the month of
February, as the candidates prepared for a highly contentious March Primary,on March 7. Of
note was a race in Senate District 21 where Assemblyman Jack Scott defeated Assemblyman
Scott Wildman for the Democratic nomination. Vying for the seat in Senate District 23,
Assemblywoman Sheila Kuehl defeated Assemblyman Wally Knox for the Democrat
nomination. Lastly,Assemblyman Ed Vincent defeated Assemblyman Dick Floyd for the Senate
District 25 seat.
11. LEADERSHIP CHANGES IN THE ASSEMBLY AND SENATE
With Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa(D-Los Angeles)termed out at the end of this
year's session,the Assembly Democrats began grooming a new heir apparent in the fall to
succeed Speaker Villaraigosa. On April 13, 2000 Assemblyman Robert Hertzberg(D-Van
Nuys) was officially swom in as Speaker. Hertzberg,the former Chair of the powerful
Assembly Rules Committee,immediately named a successor to his position on Assembly Rules,
in Assemblyman Dennis Cardoza. The Speaker's office has confirmed that the rest of Speaker
Hertzberg's new leadership team is still under negotiation.
Meanwhile Senator Ross Johnson has stepped down as Senate Republican Leader,citing the
poor health of his mother, wife, and his daughter, who is recovering from surgery. He noted that
he was unable to commit the necessary time needed to the position, in light of these important
family issues. His successor, Senator Jim Brulte will now assume the role of Republican Leader,
effective immediately.
111. LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE REFORM EFFORTS CONTINUE
In March,the Speaker's Commission on State and Local Government Finance released its final
report,and recommendations identifying"appropriate and viable fiscal reform measures for
California." In the overview of the report, entitled"Message from the Chair,"Commission
Chairman, David Abel states, "In the unanimous opinion of the Commission,more than two
1
decades of neglect and band-aid responses to the unintended consequences of Proposition 13
need to end quickly. We must shift gears and return to our long held tradition of community
independence and authority if the California we treasure is to be passed along to future
generations..." Specifically,the Commission's Final Recommendations are as follows:
"1) Within each county, the county and each city would swap a portion of their locally levied
sales tax with the State far an equal amount of the property tax. The locally levied 1%sales tax
rate would be reduced to.5%and the State rate would be raised by.5a/o. An equal amount of
property tax would be shied from K-14 entities. The State, using the new revenue from the.5%
of the sales tax, would baclfill educational programs through the State Aid system.
2)Return $1 billion of property taxes to counties, cities and special districts from the
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF)in each county or other State sources over
time in annual installments of not less than$100 million, provided the t the grototh in any year
of per capita non-proposition 98 general fund revenue exceeds the statewide consumer price
index for the prior year.
3) Existing lary requires the State to replace the reduced fee revenue unth other State resources.
Create a constitutional obligation on the part of the State to maintain the per capita subvention
and replace the revenue lost due to the reduction in the Vehicle License Fee.
4) The existing.5% 'transactions and use'taxing authority mould be moved into the
Constitution so that voters, upon their approval of this proposal, would have the assurance that
the resultant revenues could not be used to supplant State spending. The allocation of those
revenues nrould be based on local agreement."
In the section entitled"Increased Accountability,"the Commission has recommended that the
state adopt: 1) State and Local Performance Measures,2) Adopt a State/County Service Compact
spelling out roles,responsibilities,duties,etc.3)Encourage counties to implement county
budgets that distinguish the role of the county in providing countywide services from its"urban
service"responsibilities for unincorporated areas of the county, and 4)"Requires the county
auditor or appropriate State agency to report annually the amount and relative share of the
property tax revenues for each agency in a manner that facilitates understanding and
comparability among cities and counties about how the property tax funds municipal services.
It should indicate the rates levied by special districts providing services commonly provided by a
full service city such as parks and recreation services, library services,fire services in a way
which compares them to those levied by a full service city and should portray allocations for
redevelopment.county,and educational iurisdictions."
The report will now be incorporated into legislation that is pending before a joint legislative
Conference Committee on the issue: AB 1396-Villwaigosa. The Conference Committee has not
yet held a meeting on the issue.
2
Meanwhile,the legislature is also gearing up for an intensive series of hearings on state
and local government financing, led by Budget Conference Committee Chair, Senator
Steve Peace. The additional Conferees include Senator Chuck Poochigian, Senator Don
Perata, Assemblyman John Longville(Chair,Assembly Local Government),
Assemblymember Dion Aroner,and Assemblyman George Runner. The hearings will
commence on Tuesday, May 2 and will continue for several weeks. Senate President pro
Tem,John Burton,has assigned his Chief of Staff,Diane Cummins,to organize and
direct the Conference Committee. Ms Cummins has divided the first hearing to allow
cities,counties,and special districts to testify in proportionate segments. CASA,AC WA,
and CSDA have been asked to testify within the segment on special districts. We will
keep you posted as to the developments of this group as well as the former Speaker's
Conference Committee.
IV. LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION REPORT
On Wednesday,May 3, the Little Hoover Commission released its report on special
districts. While the report contains some positive comments, i.e. special districts
"provide important services to virtually every community in the State,"it will also
present us with a number of challenges in the months to come. The report,which was
based on a survey of more than 500 special districts,makes five significant
recommendations. They are:
I. The Governor and the Legislature should enact legislation that makes
special districts more visible and accountable.
2. LAFCOs,by not being aggressive,have failed to promote the effective
evolution of special districts—the State should provide LAFCO with
direction and resources.
3. Equip policy makers with tools to guide organization of independent
special districts—the Governor and the Legislature should establish a
program at the California Policy Research Center or similar institute.
4. Hundreds of independent special districts have banked multi-million dollar
reserves that are not well publicized and often not considered in regional
or statewide infrastructure planning—the Governor and the Legislature
should enact policies that will ensure prudent management of special
district's reserve funds and incorporate these resources into regional and
statewide infrastructure planning.
5. Policy makers should scrutinize the appropriateness of maintaining
property tax allocations to enterprise special districts. The State Auditor
should examine enterprise districts that receive property taxes and also
have the highest reserves. The Legislature could then reduce or eliminate
the property taxes with the possibility of counties reclaiming and
reallocating the property tax revenues.
3
The report notes that"some reserves appear to be unreasonably large"and lists in chart
form,the"top 25"districts with large reserves as a percentage of gross to retained
earnings. Benefits and compensation to elected officials is also covered in the report with
the notation that the majority of the special district elected officials receive less than
$5,000 annually,with 78%of sanitary districts being in this category.
On a positive note,the Commission report,in the section dealing with reserves, states,
"Enterprise special districts play an important role in providing infrastructure to their
communities. The issue is, given their financial resources,they could play an even
larger role and whether they should ever turn to the State for financial help." Regarding
special districts,the report notes "the vast majority we successful,"and"bigger is not
always better." We will keep you informed as future developments occur.
V. COMMISSION ON REORGANIZATION FOR 21"CENTURY
As we reported at the August Conference and then again in January,the Commission on
Governance for the 21"Century,known as the "Hertzberg Commission,"was formed to
complete a"study of potential revisions to the laws that govem city, county and special
district boundary changes (the local agency formation section of the Government Code,
also known as the"Cortese Knox Act"). CASA monitored the activity of the
Commission and had the opportunity to present testimony during one hearing in Fresno.
The provisions of the study have now been incorporated in AB 2838 by Assemblyman
Hertzberg,the new Speaker of the Assembly. While much of the bill deals with the areas
of annexations, land use, and LAFCO independence, it does not appear to pose any major
threats to special districts. In fact,one provision of the bill deals with"the reinforcement
of the legitimacy of special districts,including representation on LAFCO's." The one
concern of a few of our CASA agencies related to the"conducting authority"of special
districts. Thanks to the efforts of Bob Reeb,ACWA lobbyist and former Assembly
consultant,we were able to get a favorable compromise on this issue. In essence, if all
goes well, language will be incorporated in the bill that provides when a petition for
district annexation is filed with LAFCO,LAFCO will notify the affected agency's
governing board,which will have a certain amount of time,e.g. 30 days,to adopt a
resolution opposing the action, in effect, stopping it. If the agency does not exercise this
authority, later in the process the agency can still adopt a resolution to which LAFCO has
to give"great weight."
VI. SENATOR POLANCO REQUESTS AN INTERIM HEARING ON
BIOSOLIDS
As an alternative to proceeding with his SB 1956, Senator Richard Polanco has requested
that the Senate Environmental Quality Committee hold an interim hearing on biosolids
land application. In a letter to Senator Byron Sher,Chair of the Committee, Senator
Polanco noted that"the issue of proper management of biosolids is extremely important
for the environment and for the infrastructure of the state"and"cannot be ignored or
dismissed lightly."
4
Senator Polanco had introduced SB 1956 on behalf of the City of Los Angeles and the
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. The legislation was prompted by concern over
the number of counties that have adopted,or are considering,bans or severe restrictions
on land application. SB 1956 would have allowed local agencies to adopt ordinances
regulating biosolids land application that are more stringent than federal and state
requirements only where supported by sound science,and would have allowed interested
parties to appeal local ordinances to the State Water Resources Control Board. CASA
and the League of California Cities were in strong support of the measure. Opponents
included the Sierra Club,AC WA,the agricultural community and a number of individual
counties,all of which raised concerns about restricting local control. Given the
controversy surrounding the bill, Senator Polanco and the sponsors decided not to
proceed with SB 1956 this year.
VH. MANDATORY PENALTY CLEAN-UP BILL STILL IN DEVELOPMENT
Discussions with interested parties continue in an effort to draft clean-up legislation to
ease the mandatory penalty burden on small communities and small business. SB 709,
signed by the Governor last summer,imposes mandatory minimum penalties of$3,000
for specified violations of an NPDES permit. Many of the implementation issues have
been resolved by interpretive guidance issued by the State Water Resources Control
Board's Office of General Counsel. The legislation will focus on providing an exemption
from mandatory penalties for entities discharging pursuant to a Cease and Desist Order or
Time Schedule Order. The vehicle for the clean-up language will be SB 2165 by Senator
Byron Sher, which is still in preliminary form pending the outcome of the working group
discussions.
VIII. BILL TO BAN LINDANE PASSES FIRST HURDLE
AB 2318 by Assemblymember Alan Lowenthal would prohibit the use of lindane for the
treatment of head lice and scabies,effective January 1,2002. CASA is supporting the
bill and working closely with the author. The bill was approved by the Assembly
Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials and now moves to the
Appropriations Committee. Lindane shampoos and creams are rinsed off after use in the
sink or shower, and make their way to the sewers. Lindane is not removed well in the
wastewater treatment process,and passes through to downstream creeks, rivers and the
ocean. Since a single treatment of lindane pollutes 6 million gallons of water,it is very
difficult for POTWs to meet the freshwater standard of 19 parts per trillion. Not only is
lindane highly toxic, but safer and more effective substitutes are widely available. At this
time,AB 2318 is supported by POTWs,health organizations and the Sierra Club. There
is no opposition to the bill.
5
IX. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
AB 2799 by Assemblyman Kevin Shelley would allow,among other things, a court to
order disclosure of documents without regard to whether the documents are protected
from disclosure by a privilege. Current law recognizes that there are valid reasons to
withhold documents, such as employee privacy,attorney-client privilege or deliberative
process privilege. AB 2799 would allow a court to override these considerations and
order disclosure. This would effectively nullify the public's right to claim these
privileges. Moreover,because the payment of attorney's fees is mandatory under the
Public Records Act,a public entity would be obligated to pay a plaintiffs attomy's fees
even where a record was properly withheld, if the judge decides to override that decision
pursuant to the bill.
Ruthann Ziegler,one of our CASA attorneys on the Legislative Committee,volunteered
to attend a meeting of the sponsors,the California Newspaper Publishers Association,
and the First Amendment Coalition,and other opponents to the measures,and was
effective in making key arguments as to why this would negatively impact local
governmental agencies. Ultimately,before the policy committee,Assemblyman Shelley
acknowledged problems with the bill,particularly the so-called"reverse balancing test"
which he agreed to remove at the committee's request. In the end, the bill still did not
have sufficient votes for passage and was granted reconsideration. Special thanks to
Ruthann Ziegler for her assistance.
X. DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
Senator Dave Kelley, at the request of CASA, agreed to author legislation to increase
directors compensation in an amount not to exceed 5%per year,since the last adjustment
in 1986. Senator Kelley's measure, SB 1559, has passed the Senate and is awaiting
hearing in the Assembly.
XI. CHUCK CARRY ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT AS CHIEF ENGINEER
AND GENERAL MANAGER OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Charles"Chuck" Carry has been with the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles
County for 39 years, having served as a Chief Engineer and General Manager for the last
16 years. He will be succeeded by Jim Stahl, who most of you know has been Assistant
Chief Engineer and Assistant General Manager since 1984.
6
Chuck graduated from Loyola University (which is now Loyola Marymount)with a
Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering,and in 1961 received his Masters in Sanitary
Engineering from the California Institute of Technology(Cal Tech). He has received
many awards over the years,and last fall was inducted into the Loyola Marymount
School of Engineering"Alumni Wall of Fame"for his professional achievements. Chuck
has been active in CASA for many,many years,having served as Chair of the Legislative
Committee,a member of the Executive Board, and he served as CASA's President in
1987. While Chuck's golf handicap may have been suspect at times,his hard work and
dedication on behalf of CASA and the Sanitation Districts has never been questioned.
You may recall that the Executive Board at the January meeting granted Chuck Carry
honorary membership. We hope that he and Ginger will come back and visit us often.
XIL LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY ATTACHED
Attached is a list of the bills that have been reviewed,to date during the 1999-2000
Legislative Session,by the CASA Legislative Committee, chaired by First Vice
President,Rich Luthy.
7
i
local news ffiUe'FlikcrsfrclD P.aktaraian ..n�
Company flushes plans for
sludge site
Filed: 05iO4/2000
By CHRISTINE BEFELL
Caltfomian staff water
e mail:cbedeII@bakemfiield.com
The Yakima Co. has pulled the plug on plans to build a sludge-
composting facility in western Kern County, ending a six-month
public controversy.
The company has decided to seek a "larger, more suitable" site in
another jurisdiction, Yakima President Jim Willett said Thursday.
Willett said he needs 1,000 acres, far more than the Kem site
encompasses, better access to highways and a location farther
away from incompatible development.
The frigid response his project received from residents near the
original spot — on 320 acres at 7th Standard Road and Magnolia
Avenue northwest of Bakersfield—also affected the decision
making, he said. .
"Ideally, you'd like to be someplace where you're welcome as
well," Willett said. "It's definitely not Magnolia and 7th Standard."
The boards of at least three area srhnnl r istrirh had vntprt to
oppose the Yakima project, also referred to as Valley
Composting, Inc.: Maple School District; Wasco Union High
School District; and Rio-Bravo Greeley Union School District.
They feared the Class B biosolids to be processed—including a
mix of treated human and industrial waste used as fertilizer on
non-edible crops—would generate bad odors and flies and
pollute the groundwater.
The facility would have operated about six miles from Maple
School. The school's buses would have traveled within a half-mile
of it, raising additional concerns, said Lynn Joiner, administrative
assistant to the Maple district superintendent.
"It's encouraging that the efforts of so many people who would be
affected (by Yakima's project) have been recognized," Joiner
said.
Yakima would have produced at the site "exceptional quality'
biosolids —the only kind Kern County will allow on cropland
effective 2003.
It would have been capable of receiving 600,000 wet tons of
organic waste, including 360,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids.
The waste would have come from eight waste agencies, most of
them in Southern California but also from the North of the River
Sanitary District.
Yakima's pullout won't affect North of the River much, officials
there said.
Yakima already applies Class B biosolids from those agencies on
Kern County farms, about 200,000 wet tons a year.
-
It has operated here since 1994.
Yakima began working to secure the composting facility in Kern
County about a year ago. When the public started hearing about
it six months ago, Yakima organized or spoke at numerous
community meetings to explain its intentions.
Company officials and supporters never mustered much
community backing, however.
Although he no longer wants to build in Kern County, Willett said
he'd still like to locate somewhere in the San Joaquin Valley.
Once Yakima completes construction and permitting —which he
expects to take one year— it will move its land-application
business out of Kern County as well, he said.
This year, Yakima has applied about one-third of all biosolids
applied in Kern County, according to the county Environmental
Health Services Department. Last year it spread 24 percent of the
total.
Kern County Supervisor Ken Peterson, whose district would have
housed the operation, was opposed to the project and called the
relocation announcement good news.
Even though Yakima would have produced the kind of material
the county eventually wants applied, Peterson said he had to side
with his very concerned constituents.
"There could be a place to do this," Peterson said of the project's
siting, "but this was the wrong place."
m ® GGs
W<k back W lop kome
CoppgM W PI Th Bak fi IA G4M I P.[,lyhe w mbmJ er
As da tl P C kl M' I Ptrraw Pollcv Statement
Cpunty declares victory after sludge bill rescinded Page 1 of 3
NewWlats7 ?' V[✓1
news CIN Wakr Adis cdibrnimt
County declares victory after
sludge bill rescinded
Filed: 04242000
By CHRISTINE BEDELL
Californian staff'writer
e-mail:cbedell@bakenfleld.a,
Kem County officials declared a legislative victory Monday after a bill
that could have blocked them from regulating sewage sludge was pulled
from consideration by its author.
State Sen. Richard Polanco, D-Los Angeles, asked that "interim
hearings" first be held on his legislation so lawmakers can study it in
greater detail.
Such hearings are held, but referring a bill to one often is a way of
killing it for that legislative session.
Members of a large Kern County contingent that traveled to Sacramento
Monday for the bill's first hearing, before the Environmental Quality
Committee, declared victory.
"All of our hard work paid off," said Kern County Counsel Bernard
Barmann.
Polanco's Senate Bill 1956 sought to prohibit local governments from
enacting or enforcing biosolids ordinances more restrictive than federal
and state standards except under limited circumstances.
Sludge, or biosolids, is a mix of industrial and human waste used as
fertilizer on non-edible crops.
The Kern County Board of Supervisors, concerned about the material's
environmental impacts, banned in October the land application of all but
highly treated "exceptional quality" biosolids effective 2003.
Several Southern California waste agencies that send sludge to Kem
County, including those for the city of Los Angeles and the counties of
http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--125550878Lasp 11 04/25/2000
County declares victory after sludge bill rescinded Page 2 of 3
Los Angeles and Orange, are suing Kem to set aside the ordinance.
They backed Polanco's bill, which would have required that
municipalities show the land application of sewage sludge "will result in
unreasonable adverse effects on the environment or public health" before
substantially restricting its use.
In recent weeks,Kem County officials,farmers and others lobbied
Environmental Quality Committee members in Sacramento against SB
1956.
Several did so again Monday morning, including Barman, Grimmway
Farms attorney Jeff Green,Jim Crettol, former president of the Kem
County Farm Bureau, and grower Howard Frick.
Polanco requested the pulling of his bill through a letter to committee
Chairman Byron Sher, D-Palo Alto. While his legislation "appropriately
addresses" the sludge issue,Polanco wrote, people have raised "many
concerns" about it.
"It is both a scientific and a political issue, and it is important we have
the proper forum to discuss the matter in detail," Polanco wrote.
Interim hearings are held after the end of the current legislative session
and before the beginning of the next one, a period of a few months in the
fall and winter.
Such hearings sometimes are scheduled and held, but often they aren't
and the bill dies.
Mike Moore, manager of environmental compliance and monitoring for
the Orange County Sanitation District, one of the agencies suing Kern
County, said his agency supported Polanco's move.
It's better that the bill be taken up after a statewide Environmental
Impact Report on the use of sewage sludge is completed, he said.
"The timing was just not right," Moore said. "We originally thought that
the statewide EIR would have been certified by this time, and since it
was not, we support the senator's decision to pull the bill."
Californian reporter Vic Pollard contributed to this report.
back baekft%p Iwrrla
Copyhghl®20 ,The aakemtleld Calllomian I Emall the Webmasler
A sedated Press Comnaht Notice I Pdh "PoMv Statement
Sludge facility issue decided Page I of 2
news Mr lgah pm SaliI== .h.,,..
Sludge facility issue decided
Filed: 0412712000
By CHRISTME BEDELL
Californian staff writer
email:cbedellCabakersfiekl.com
Kem County has lost Round 1 of its fight to block permits for a sludge-
composting facility near Bakersfield until a potential user takes over the
project's environmental study.
The Governor's Office of Planning and Research ruled this week that
Kem County—not the Orange County Sanitation District—should be
"lead agency" for The Yakima Co. project and see the studies through.
But the ruling may not settle the issue. Kern County officials say that
despite the decision, they will not immediately resume processing
Yakima's plans.
They want to wait until the court acts on separate but related lawsuits
between Kern County and several sanitation agencies and companies,
including Orange County Sanitation, over Kem's new sludge ordinance.
Thomas Nixon,an attorney for Orange County Sanitation, said Kern's
decision seems retaliatory.
"It sounds like somebody's a little miffed over the separate litigation,"
Nixon said.
The disputed facility would produce "exceptional quality" biosolids, also
known as sewage sludge,on a 320-acre site north of 7th Standard Road
and five miles east of Interstate 5.
It's partly being built in anticipation of a Kem County ban on the
cropland application of all but highly treated, "exceptional quality"
biosolids.That goes into effect in 2003.
The facility would be capable of receiving up to 600,000 wet tons of
organic waste, including 360,000 wet tons of Class B biosolids.
http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--I255250153.asp I 17) 04/28/2000
Sludge facility issue decided Page 2 of 2
Residents and school officials in the area have actively opposed the
project, saying the material processed there could harm the environment.
Kern County planners suspended processing of Yakima's permit
applications in March, after teaming that Orange County contracted to
supply Yakima with at least 100,000 wet tons of biosolids a year and had
secured an option to purchase the site.
Kern officials inferred that Orange County Sanitation District really was
carrying out the project and so should be lead agency.
Yakima, which says it has contracted to take biosolids from eight
additional public agencies, asked the Governor's Office of Planning and
Research to weigh in. It did.
"(Kern County)has the greatest governmental authority and
responsibility for approving the project," said Steven Nissen,acting
office director.
Kern County hasn't decided whether to appeal the ruling in Superior
Court, said Deputy County Counsel James Thebeau.
Kern might let the Tulare County courts resolve the matter as part of
rival lawsuits being heard there over the appropriateness of Kern
County's biosolids ordinance, he said.
"One way or another, it's going to be a subject of court action," Thebeau
said.
The Yakima Co. also could turn to the courts if Kern County fails to
process the composting facility permits,Nixon said.
Nixon said he was "surprised" by Kern's position since the facility would
produce the kind of material Kern says it wants applied here.
Jim Willett, president of The Yakima Co., said he hadn't heard about
Kern County's unwillingness to proceed with permitting and so he hasn't
yet weighed his legal options.
"We'll have to huddle on that, I guess," Willett said.
® ® 4
back back b top home
CopYtl9hM 2000,ma eekers0eltl Cellfornlen 1 Email the➢ oMagl1pr
ALS9giated I[Py1rlvacv Policv Statement
1
b,..•//•..•.•. 6..Lemr:eld �.....N..../:_ 1 OGMGl11 G'! ..e ��•�" ����
Ashburn takes sludge fight to Assembly Page 1 of 2
\\�� i ti ► 4 � le'7 �
news II[bc Baketatiem d.'alitomten
Ashburn takes sludge fight to
Assembly
Filed: 05IV312000
By CHRISTINE BEDELL
Californian staff writer
e-mail:cbedeBCPbakersfield.corn
An Assembly committee on Wednesday took a"first step"toward
assuring Kern County's right to regulate the spreading of sewage-sludge
within its borders.
The Committee on Local Government unanimously approved legislation
blocking government agencies doing business in other jurisdictions from
overriding the policies of the host jurisdiction.
Assemblyman Roy Ashburn,R-Bakersfield,wrote the bill at the request
of the Kern County Board of Supervisors.
The supervisors hope the legislation will help stave off attacks by several
Southern California waste generators and handlers opposed to the
county's new sludge ordinance.
The ordinance, which will ban the land application of all but
"exceptional quality" biosolids effective in 2003, is the subject of a
lawsuit in Tulare County Superior Court.
Wednesday's hearing was the first test for Assembly Bill 2495.
"This is a great victory, and a first step toward increased local control
where the law's been uncertain," said County Counsel Bernard Barmann,
one of several local officials who went to Sacramento for the hearing.
The one-sentence legislation would extend far beyond the regulation of
land-applied sludge used as fertilizer on nonedible crops.
It would block governments from claiming immunity from all sorts of
building, zoning and health and safety regulations
i
http://www.bakersfi'eld.com/top/i--1254730788.asp h 05/04/2000
Ashburn takes sludge fight to Assembly Page 2 of 2
Ashburn's legislation would close a loophole created by an attorney
general's legal opinion issued in the 1960s.
Some members of the committee represent areas of Southern California
that export biosolids to Kern County,but Ashburn said no one spoke in
opposition to AB 2495.
The Los Angeles and[range county boards of supervisors, two of the
entities suing to set aside Kern County's sludge ordinance, have not
taken formal positions on the bill.
Since it would not impact the state budget,the measure probably will go
directly to the Assembly floor for consideration,Ashburn said.
The lawmaker said he's not sure what kind of reception it will receive.
"Because one aspect of it involves the disposal of sewage sludge by
Orange and Los Angeles counties in Kern County and other areas ...
there are big players that might have an interest in it," Ashburn said. "At
some point, we'll hear from them."
® 0
back backte Wp baps
CoWght02000,The 9akers0ekl Q411omlen I Emer the Webmaster
AssodateE Press CeMAght Notice I P eev P.11 &awment
httn://www.bakersfield.com/too/i--1254730788.asn nsrnar)nnn
2"D ANNUAL
SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED PLANNING MEETING
For further information: Lindell L.Marsh 949-752-1538; email: Imarsh®worldnet.attnet
THURSDAY-FRIDAY,JUNE 1-2,2000
DOUBLETREE HOTEL
222 N. VINEYARD AVENUE, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91765
A One and one-half day coming-together of local, state and federal agencies and
interests to address the future of the Santa Ana River Watershed
Sponsored by: the Urban Water Institute, the Growth Management Institute and the Santa
Ana River Watershed Group,with financial support from the Orange County Water and
Sanitation Districts and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Thursday afternoon: small group sessions
Thursday evening dinner: Mary Jane Forster, State Water Board Member to address:
"An Urbanizing Watershed of National Signiftcance"
Friday: plenary sessions
The Meeting is open to the interested public and will provide local and regional leaders
with a chance to learn about the area's potential and to be involved in planning for its
future. REGISTRATION FORMS ARE ATTACHED.
WHY THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED?
• The Largest river is Southern California draining to the Pacific Ocean
• The fastest growing watershed in the nation (4.7 to 6.8 people in 2020)
• The two largest groundwater basins in Southern California available for
conjunctive use
• The largest freshwater wetlands in Southern California; the most important
stop in Southern California on the Pacific Flyway
• Responsible for one-fifth of the State's economic production
• Elects one-sixth of the State Legislation and 11 members of Congress
An economic and political powerhouse
TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED include: water quality and supply; land use development,
transition and conservation; the future of the Chino Basin; the Chino Basin Organics
Center; and partnerships in the watershed. See the following conference program.
THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2000
SMALL GROUP PLANNING SESSIONS
1:00 p.m.: REGISTRATION
1:30 p.m.: SMALL GROUP SESSIONS
Purpose of the Small Group Sessions is to review and refine the program elements,
involving local,state and federal agencies and interests, as well as experts for
presentation to the plenary sessions on Friday.
A. Chino Basin Organics Center(part of a national network of centers)
Discussion Leaders:Richard Atwater,General Manager,Inland Empire
Utilities Agency; Robert Feenstra,Executive Director,Milk Producers Council
B. Conservation and Transition Planning
Discussion Leaders:Jerry Blum,City Planner,City of Ontario;
(Invited) Charles Coe,Director, Community Development,City of Chino
C. Water Supply and Quality
Discussion Leaders: William Mills,General Manager,Orange County Water
District;Jerry Thibeault,Executive Officer,Water Quality Control Board,Santa
Ana Region;Joe Grindstaff, General Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Project
—Authority; Traci Stewart,Chief of Watermaster Services, Chino Basin
Watermaster
D. Watershed Agenda/Partnerships
Discussion Leaders: Ronald Loveridge,Mayor,City of Riverside;
Lindell Marsh,Facilitator/Counsel, Santa Ana River Watershed Group
6:30 p.m.Dinner--Celebrating the Grove Avenue Basin and Dairy Pilot Washwater
Project.
Speaker: Mary Jane Forster,Member, California Water Resources Control Board
"Urbanizing Watersheds of National Significance"
JUNE 2- PLENARY SESSION
7:30 a.m. Richard Atwater,General Manager
Registration-Continental Breakfast Inland Empire Utilities Agency
8:30 a.m. Robert permits,Executive Director
Welcome Milk Producers Council
Wayne Clark,Executive Director
Urban Water Institute,Inc. Response and Discussion:
Blake Anderson,Co-Chair
Santa Ana River Watershed Group Jeff Vonk,National Resources
General Manager Conservation
Orange County Sanitation District United States Department of Agriculture
9:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m.
THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED,A Break
CHALLENGED WATERSHED:THE
ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR,LOCAL, 11:15 a.m
STATE,FEDERAL PARTNERSHIPS THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED,
WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY
REPORT FROM THE WATERSHED
AGENDA/PARTNERSHIPS GROUP REPORT FROM THE WATER QUALITY
AND SUPPLY GROUP
Ron Loveridge,Mayor
City of Riverside William Mills.General Manager
Orange County Water District
Lindell Marsh,Facilitator/Counsel
Santa Ana River Watershed Group Jerry Thibeault,General Manager
Water Quality Control Board,
Response and Discussion: Santa Ana Region
Philip Oshida,Chief Joe GrindstaH,General Manager
Wetlands Strategies and State Programs Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency
• Traci Stewart,Chief of Watermaster
• Maria Rea,Assistant Secretary, Services,Chino Basin Watermester
Watersheds and Salmon Restoration
California Resources Agency Response and Discussion:
• Dan Young,Assc Chief,Planning Bob Joe,Executive Legislative Manager
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California
Burnell Cavender,General Manager
San Bernardino Valley Water Mary Jane Forster,Board Member
Conservation District State Water Resources Control Board
Bob Fisher,Executive Director Steve Kasower.Regional Planning Officer
Friends of Orange County Harbors, U.S.Bureau of Reclamation,Southern Calif.
Beaches and Parks
12 noon Luncheon
10:00 a.m.
Break 1:00 p.m
A VISION FOR THE SMART GROWTH OF
10:15 a.m. THE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED
CHINO BASIN ORGANICS
MANAGEMENT CENTER:PART OF A Clayton Record,Director
NATIONAL NETWORK OF CENTERS: Eastern Municipal Water District
OPPORTUNITIES;CONCEPT,STRATEGY Metropolitan Water District of So.Calif.
AND IMPLEMENTATION
Supervisor John Tavaglione,Second
REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL District,Riverside County(invited)
ORGANICS CENTER GROUP
Supervisor Charles Smith,First District Kenneth Coresio,Managing Director
Orange County(invited) O'Connor and Company,Securities
3:00 p.m.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE:THE
1:30 p.m. SANTA ANA WATERSHED GROUP
Break
Blake Anderson,General Manager
2:00 p.m. Orange County Sanitation District
CHINO BASIN CONSERVATION AND
TRANSITION PLANNING Lindell Marsh,Esq.,Consultant,
Siemon,Larsen&Marsh
REPORT FROM THE CONSERVATION
AND TRANSITION GROUP Robert Feenstra,Executive Director
Milk Producers Council
Jerry Blum,City Planner
City of Ontario 3:30 p.m.
Adjourn
Charles Coe
Director of Community Development
City of Chino
Response and Discussion:
• John Withers,Governmental Relations
Lewis Homes
• Dan Silver,Coordinator
Endangered Habitats League
Program and Registration Information
REGISTRATION DEADLINE-MAY 26,2000
Complete the form below and mail your check,credit card(Visa and Master Card)authorization
or purchase order(payable to the Urban Water Institute)to the Urban Water Institute,3 Civic
Plaza,Suite#100,Newport Beach CA 92660,fax to 949/760-6073. Space is limited and will not
be held without advance payment.Registration after May 26will be accepted by fax only with
advance credit card payment on a space available basis. An additional charge of$25 will apply to
registrations at the door. Call in advance to determine whether space is available.
LOCATION AND LODGING
Site of the program is the DoubleTree Hotel,222 N.Vineyard Avenue,Ontario CA 91765.Hotel
overnight reservations must be made directly with the hotel by calling 909/937-0900.Be sure to
mention that you are attending the Urban Water/Santa Ana River Watershed Group, 2nd Annual
Planning Meeting.Government rates apply.
CONFERENCE INFORMATION
URBAN WATER INSTITUTE,INC.,3 Civic Plaza,Suite 100,Newport Beach CA 92660
Tel. 949/760.6071,FAX 949/760-6073,E-mail urbanwaterl 0aol.com
(tax ID#33-0578523)
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Registration includes continental breakfast and luncheon,and information packets. Visa and
Master Cards accepted.No registration held without full payment. An additional charge of$35 is
required for dinner on Thursday evening,June 1.
CANCELLATION POLICY
Cancellations must be received in writing by May 26. (Faxes accepted).Enrollment fees will be
returned, less a$25 administrative charge. No refunds will be granted after May 26.No-shows
will be invoiced. Substitutes are acceptable.The Institute reserves the right to cancel any
program,to substitute announced speakers and assumes no responsibility for personal expenses.
Please tear off said mail to the Urban Water Institute,Inc.
0 YES.Register the following person for the Second Annual Santa Am River Watershed Planning Meeting,
Double Trec Hotel,Ontario.
0 Conference Registration:$12-1
0 Emeritus,academic and student registration,$50.(with proof)
C 3 Dinner,Thursday evening.June I:$35
Check Enclosed$ or P.O.R for invoice
Credit Card a 0 Vtm,0 Master Card Expiration Date:
Signature
Name: —'title
Agency/Firm Telephone( )
Address FAX( )
City State_ Zip Code
e-mail address
Make hotel reservations directly with hotel at(909)937-0900.Call early for limited government rotes.
Use photo copies for each additional registration.
CATEMP\PLANNING MEETING SUMMARY.doc
Foocv400
RanoF counT Y 15
-� WATER FUTURE
Vol. 1, No.4 =r, , e )l
Spring 1 J
PINANC,
PARrNeRS For Orange County,
County of Orange Water is the Constant in an Era of Change
Municipal
Water District
of Orange County ater ploys a central mle in Orange daa,while the ccinferencc theme.`looking
Metropolitan Cmunh11 pact,present,and—quite Fomarl Together:\foster and Orange Count%s
11.1,District of certaink—future.That message,among others. Future."pnnided a unifiing note.
southern California came through loud and clear for the nude 150
Orange County attendees at the first Orange County Water The Past Is Prologue
Rater Di tics Conference on October 29. 1999 at the Beckman Conference attendees listened to a presents-
Orange County Center in Inine.California. lion on the importance of water in Orange
Sanitation District Just as important was a consensus among the Cnnnh's past firma Mrs.Jmm Inine Smith,who is
City of.Anaheim speakers and the participants that Orange Counh amsidered to Ira"the first lade of water in Orange
civic,business,and water industry leaders need to Courac"For Mrs. Smith,looking into the future
City of Santa Ana better caardinate their projects,programs•and requires understanding the past.
C.S.Rurrou approaches to regional,state,and federal regda- Mrs.Smith were together the histon.of water
Of Reclamation furs•administrators.and political leaders. development and management in Orange Counh•
National Thee conference—the first of its kind in Orange with the histon of her,mu fiumhl who founded
Rater Research Comm —served as a the]nine Ranch more
Institute
fitting enhnination of thorn a century ago.
Coa riat Municipal the first rear of"Focus Front the IM. to the
stater District on Orange Counh•'s '91'hen l tea..Initing up. I slienl my srhtsd 19%,droughts and
City of Fullerton \Passer Future."The raralian.I kiling nut grandfather al the Ranch. narcls punctuated ents
Ain. o, ,all goal of-Focus" ruin 1 eery nffen accompanied lit,,, in hoop rl his of agricultural cl rvlop-
Rater Management is to integrate technical it-tiler system, u.hidr included the urlls.the turns in Cringe Count)
Agency information from multi- irrigalion lines.she dihdtex.and she elan'.. And,since the 19U,
South last Regional ple crater planning the need to secure an
Re Iturin oo projects into a regional Fnnn rhildhoml. This rrin rirun•drrphl iuynrssrd adequate and reliable
Authority picture of current mud upon nu•that no problem m,mhadaired the water supply has been
firhtre water demands. Ranh nunr than the snplrly of uvrlen.. pivotal to Orange
water supple options• Countr's residential and
mid water gtalih,chal- — 1hu.Jorc On nr Srn'rm connnrec al develop-
lenges for Orange _ ment.helping to make it
Cuunh'. In keeping with raw of the must drratmic
those goals,the conference brought together economics in the world.
people of dire it interests to disc iss water issues For Mrs.Smith's hnnilr.:w well as for the entire
that then have in common. Both the audience:cod comnh,securing an adetloate water supply and
speakers included individuals fmm academia, assuring its qualih'and reliability h:we been essenfi:d
business.mid local and state ginemntent as well to gnnvih and the qualih'of life in Orange Counh'.
as from water agencies at the local. regional state. Therefore•in order m>mmiamn these standards.
and national levels. we raced to Ice tnur• Farsi0aml in the development
Thee purpose of the conference eras to prmide, of mew technologies for waaer quahh Implore-
share.and reflect upon information about the stem,the attention to mnsen:miom mud the
importance of water to Orange Cmunh'as a protection of cmimnmcnl:d surroundings.
whole. Mann perspeclires on that topic fulled the Cnnllnned on Pmr•2
r f`
Conelnuerlfmm Page 1
b"'r, "Meeting the ever-growing demand for
water,protecting it,and replenishing
s ;y depleted supplies are very formidable and
n expensive challenges;'concluded Mrs.
f Smith."We can reasonably expect another
S - 18 million people to call California home
by the year 2025,and we can reasonably
expect most of the population increase to
S take place in Southern California. Now is a
time to take a very hard look at reality." j
Water's Role in r/{
Orange County Today
Moderated by Stan Sprague,General
Manager of the Municipal Water Distict of Rnnalrl Linsk�.National 1Vatm Ha,vnrch hrrtinrte(\'ll itil.
Orange Cmmht a four-person panel and Al..Joan Irvine Smith,NIVRI founder.
discussed the current relationship
between water and business, [Dent government. Santa Ana River Mainstem Project,which is a
and the environment in Orange County. series of improvements to Rood control,to water
Robert Bein,Chairman of the Infrastructure conservation,and to the river channel facilities in
Committee of the Orange County Business Orange County and upstream.In addition,she
Council, posed a series of questions regarding aim)noted the county's initiative as lead local
.. business and economic development:"Is there a agency in partnership with the U.S.Army Corps
relationship between agriculture and water?is of Engineers on planning studies of Orange
there it relationship between high-tech County watersheds, including Aliso Creek,San
production end water?Is there it relationship be. Diego Creek,and San Juan Creek,
hveen the wastewater Janet Huston, Execu-
dis,llart o•and the water live Director for the
supph?Is there a relation- ^I believe lit,,biggest stakeholder., Orange County Division
ship wn%een residential
development and water? —Ihose icho have the most to lose— of the League of California
Is them a relationship not,the husine,s rnnunnnit/in Cities,noted that while
most cities and towns in
pall, •cu r¢'rter?I and (b,mgv<:ount/." Orange depend on
pal and water'?Is them a K IY 1
,t I I nrhip lwt veen —Rumari' lbam water districts and regional
hmri.m and mate'?Ifthe Rvxhlrul. IiRP v.%marinles agencies to assure their
uisVr 1'11 q(, to am,of ,a,/Cmiram it nflhr lnfpplmrrov Ceason,,' residentswater and
Ihm, it makes it real eat' rf the Orvmge County Rosiness Coetril wastewater services,there
u,s, win wc, all should is growing recognition
" 'J" dims time vvorking — among municipal officials
mi t6, i.me of miner. Because the economy of that fisr-away changes conceming the Delta in
(hvncr C...mh is d,'pendent on these Northern California or the Colorado River
iuduair.." watershed are relevant to Orange Countys water
M, 15,•ni added that further improvements to future. She added that the coordination of
th, r hwhilih it quality,of the water supply in services provided Itv,vater and sanitation
Ormw, Cumdw ore critical to maintaining districts with the services provided by
economic pnnperih'. For instance,he knew of at municipalities and the county is essential to
least three businesses that bad hesitated over assuring development that achieves the high
[twitting in Orange Court'because of concems expectations of living in Orange Couny.
about the adequach,and reliability of Orange Ms. Huston also stated that several munici-
CuunKs water supply. polities along Orange County's boundary with
Janice Mitenmeier.County Executive Officer I.os Angeles Count'—from Brea to Seal Beach
for the County of Orange,emphasized the —lave become actively Involved in the forms-
importance of outer in the coon rls efforts to tion of at new conservancy district for the San
plan cooperatively with local governments and Gabriel River watershed,The California legisla-
the business community in accommodating tore established the conservancy'in 1999,and
development while maintaining high quality of Orange Count•municipalities orguniwd to
life. She highlighted the county's work on the assure two seats on the conservancy hoard.The
o_
conseimum rill damlop a plan for consc•nrdion Colorado River to the South6md.Including
and restoration of open space and deal with Orange Couutf.
srateished mfmkgnnent issues along the Still Due to cb:ntges in State:nfl federal legislation
Gil)d,l Ricer and its tributaries that afkTt as well;is rcgulatnlr Iwlicirs.:uul in respnnso to
Onow,Claim,% cltauges being rerplestetl be its weuiber gGeneicc
Thoth, Brick a director in the Board of the throughout Suuthem Cnlifi nlia, \I\\'D rees:uu-
Metropolitan Water District of Southent ined both its role and its gocenuuur and mun-
Califontia(A'I\\'D), noted that one cannot talk agement structures dining IOJO. Bur instance.
about water arthout talking about the emimn- \I\YD's hoard of disc tom is decreasing in size
meat. tie said Ihat."\1'e lurce to de%elnp u,;d(-r from ail memIteis to IS, If.addition, \I\\'1) burs
resources in a%c;m that been rcorgaidwil intent-
loiII111117RS danr,prz•to alk.from 10 dhisions
the natrnal dmcn to three,which
emirouwent."Portlier- -Th, waterways of Orange Counbl an•ml tic+u on die care finxilous
non•.he fnuph:uslaxl hulmornit asperl ofourgaalLry ,J'li/i% of water system opero
that.%%hrne%x•r pasihlr. and we Irani In be,,'fire parlleipo...1, tiow'.Water vvquisition
wr need to[Ind W;ms to in ensaming Iheir Irrll-Lring." and mammew, it,and
combine water don,- mppun n 1,
(Drool eRurt+witL J s\Ice: \In II I uu'ara;.
(oanly liner.,It, 061 rr. (',not// (Urn r„e \u ha to\II.
eumm�nsntal C.a I III I.a. \I\\1)
protection grstls. loulo ahead to Ih, linln'e
Mn Brick also stated of Soot hen, California
that the mnneei ions Ia-h%cca rode,domlupmew \Cartel supplies. secwul imPorl:sot te.wsilions arc
fall emimnmental protoctiou :m. no%f more nn the horizon:
apparent to lbe Water furl ln.....it, It became • Quantifying and sertu iu;;%Ill Dh allocation
clear.se%en l rrov:e_I thud %%:der m:fw�,,emrnt ofCololvaln Rir,, .e,,pou,. "rhi,process
\flat](]hare w'hill m o, I'I'no. 'nap .,tifq w.ire wvplires not unl\cmo Ill,, ninth-Male
and mole v';dcl't..f led de%,In nuel,I undo.uud negohatiouS, hot also iaha-sLde ue"oliatiof9
leluusntucborlilac orrrtb,."'iqument of Caffi,ruias Shure.
Iron.Irolannatiun.:oat .wr.I_r- w nopm IL,IIs,' ho ,,j.or,lim;tic• C:ILTED prylem In
and rouse nl'rfistiu¢.nppli, .. \t I I h IlnIt d ,11, u„ iugnrrr uvuer quality and rnrtrmunental
rrcrn;nizvd Ihal 1111dreti1r;I.1,.d o.11, r n Inros prow,1iou in the S,arnuu'alo-Son Joaquin
—,Iola:u riy,rs nod .tr.:I nlnuh%ate r Dell". TLi,pc roe w ss- Ili, bur tal:en In ngel'
haVIln.. and with... - i.n L� % In iwl....... g ad prodneed I. ..corm,...... th:ol Luprd.
%odor n li:ah1111% :Ind �pr.dlh ill nor ngion. o a."II o...jol lc "thin."%uhi,o It , the lots
ul'a huile golf'hk a "A'r. \x o restd" there
The hater Indn8lry ►n 711vtnsitiml will probabh Iit 'until calb ins of %%:der
resource pl,umiop ad n .n ,,onwl in the
'I I" ondve, dim d I 'p,Aem. Sonthl:md In dread, . lu rune.
Th,' lied Was Iron:Ili] (;.LIB I..... .d \I m v-1, • IrnplrmrWho, .3111'D'x bargraled Resourres
0M\\'1).Who "It...1,.1 nli lh, 1. itl, Plan Thiscl
lot'I imuh o.elueor(vur(linatinn
alfocllnq tbe(li.ahi(L Lich plmnL uoporl,', ol'I„o:d %can,'n:anm'ce.%dlll imported
,,a(,-, ImIllboth Sinlhiuv t '..dd...... ,old l he supplies uud ioereused n., of storage mpacit,
;lad.nose..thou to 11P1wrt
reli.nhibl% w ithin Ibe
h;%en rue nl Ibe...demlolr
of al.iuvd%,> nrgaliuliuu.
ruurdilunlli w.:md cuulitinu
w\ bl Iildim,'I'n Ili y.nceossf ll In
51't'i l l'l l lg ill, I',jinn I c anoe
\� lidnre. Oraucrol'.if,1,
r e un III:uI sunnd 1rrIlir;d
_ nr.,(Iuurit,to snpp i,t wv
_ 1 plans.\\ It d Ill, Ili,
•'I ra:J and r nilcdca 011"
(% lo.Igtpnt Ira Il'artstl
/rnlheax of Ili,panel im Ita i0ionlepl Janrl i bwnu.moire Will rrnn,if,: rejoin a rogion:d %iaion :Ind
liolxui Ikin.TnI...My Rr Irk.aarl.titan S'prm ne. Coolioard nn P J
_3_
C.nttnued fmrn Page 3
�n s
regional cooperation."In the final analysis.
B no one entity can do it all," Mr.Gastelum ,r+cf Y'lls
concluded."We need to come together."
The second keynote speaker was George
Campbell,a member of the Board of
Directors of the Central Arizona Water I
Conservancy District(which operates the
1 i' Central Arizona Project)and of the
Colorado River Water Users Association
Mr.Campbell regaled the audience with a
trde both humorous and cautionary,abort
the changing priorities and policies govern-
ing water resources in the Southaestem
_ United States.
Although Arizona,in some wars, George Campbell,Cenevel Arizona Water Conservancy,and
competes with California when it comes to Don Alartinson,San Juan Basin Authority,
the allocation of Colorado River Neater, Mr.
Campbell observed that Arizona has its own than rely on the promised flow of Central
concems. Arizona now has the physical capacity Arizona Project(CAP)water.Southern California
to receive its total allocation of 1.5 million acre- communities mar also need to respond to changes
heel per year from the Colorado River-that is, in the management of water from the Delta and
indeed,one of the reasons why California has the allocation of water from the Colorado,and
been under increased pressure to reduce its find alternative means of shoring up the relia-
, ^ bility and quality of their water supplies.
yt annual take-6u[the allocation of that water y h' pp
. - within Arizona has undergone dramatic changes. Raymond Hart,Deputy Director of the Call-
The1980 division of Arizona's water from the fomia Department of Water Resources,rein-
kT' Central Arizona Pmject for urban(municipal and forced the messages of both keynote speakers by
t r . industrial),agri- providing infortme
,w cultural,and Indian turn about the
p, M tribe usage has been status of the
E __ revised by the Interior CALFED negotia-
- 'By cbYta•of die esMnsion of muter and ae¢er.wecicev,
times.Depa urreent several buns regarding the
•� times.Currently,half nuuul.err r mm�umitien ore being hilt,aornetina°v Delta region.A
g��g�. of Arizona's allocation oith I danaghi try,hi it-lit) aril pr.rede polire verrices, report is due in
m� ,, —'- of Coloado liver left. roll pu oride the brae pmYatmn sercaev. A better June 2000 and,
water has been shift- coordination of those the full range of services—that although it will not
ed to tribal and emi- .development ueould offer acould be helpfud to the he final,it will be
mninent.d usageand continued viability.fOrange Counly in the longem," instructive about
+e^ away,from municipal the options con-
and industrial usage. j%XET Ht vT(A, cerning the Delta
This shift has the Evocative Director, and the potential
League of Cali,(naia Cities,O"age Ginty Division
potential serious
ro create Califefiveornia
Southern
serious difficulties Cali( mu Califor-
y k $ within the state, nia is also a key
. where the growth in water demand is almost participant in the Colorado River negotiations,
entirely for urban usage. which could reduce—but make more certain—
w" Mr.Campbell's story carried two important the state's share in the river's Row. In addition,
lessons.First,fit this time of transition,even the Department of Water Resources will develop
y'yy- jo arrangements once thought to be sound and the latest update of the California Water Plan,
unchanging can shift with new times and new, which will provide projections of total water
priorities. Secrond,the challenges that Arizona's supply and demand as well as identffy am
- -,a metropolitan areas are facing may be faced deficits in average or dry-year supplies for each
a•' d' ' elsewhere in the U.S.Arizona's cities and towns region of the state.
e ' will now have to pay greater attention to
capturing and staring surplus water when it is State-of-the-Art on Display
available.They will also have to rely on other Santa Am River Supplies
self-sufficiency options,such as reclamation and Several conference presenters provided
conservation,to meet growing demands rather updates on the latest deyelnpments in watershed
le -4-
management,water conservation,water transfers, just upstream from Prado Data,has negatively
and desalination as they affect—or might affect affected Orange County's water supply for many
—Orange County years now.Through Orange County's participa-
1Aglliam Mills,General Manager of the Orange tion on the Santa Ana Watershed Project
County Water District,discussed the vital role Authority—and with vital regulatory help from
that the Santa Ana River plays in Orange County's the Regional Water Quality Control Board—
water supplies.The river provides 60 percent of serious efforts are now being made to address
the water that is re- and remediate the
charged into the Orange contamination problems
County groundwater "A lot of enrirmunnuulists would say That generated by the tons of
basin,which is the wul'e not loin"cnnugh in terms of water dairy waste deposited in
Primary drinking water - the Chino Basin since
source for most of rnneercalinn nn(I rrrlmm�limr and water
reamn'crs. But uric.loin„nun..than anyone
the 1900s.
county's population. J
Therefore,developments else iu the country. 11 a r III .la more,and we Water Use Efciermy
throughout the Santa will(In more in III(fimor... li'e enn plraect in Orange County
Ana River+vatershed— the encirnnmeul nn.l provide the water to feed Edward Agbjayan,
including events that that econonul cord prnlect Nw lifestyle to General Manager of the
take place far upstream, City of Anaheim Public
from orange which we're all become accustomed." Utilities,provided an
Count)•—have impacts -Timuntiv BNCA, update on die Water Use
upon the supply,quality, f ERiciev Steering
Bn(ll'(10 DIlCeI01'M. nc hi
and rest of water in ,tle6'opolintu Wat" Dielrict of Southern California Committee"efforts to
Orange County. support and expand water
The allocation of _ conservation in Orange
water between the lower(Orange County)and County.The committee is composed of rcpresen-
upper(Riverside and San Bernardino counties) tath2s from cities and water districts in die county,
areas of the Santa Ana River watershed bas been including Orange County Water District,
governed by a court judgment among water Municipal Water District of Orange County.and
agencies since 1969. Recent changes in the Orange County Sanitation District. Its principal
upper area—increased Bows from treated purpose is to develop a multi-agency approach to
wastewater discharges as the area urbanizes and water conservation,such as creating joint studies
the completion of Seven Oaks Dam—have or using combined purchasing power to get better
stimulated reconsideration of the allocation of deals on retrofit equipment and the like.
rights to water Rows. Some of this activity has The committee is composing it White Paper
found its way to the State Water Resources on Water Use Efficiency in
Control Board in the form of new applications Orange County for publica-
for water rights. tion.The committee is advo- '-
A cooperative agreement has been reached eating for local agencies to
between the Orange County Water District and enter the California Urban
the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Water Conservation Council
District to alleviate a high groundwater table in Memorandum of Under-
San Bernardino by pumping water out and standing,which outlines 14
sending it down the river to Orange County.This water conservation measures
agreement began with a transfer of 10,000 as Best Management Practices
acre-feet this rear and may increase to as nine], (BMPs).The committee is
as 25,000 acre-feet next Year and beyond. now trying to get the 30 water
Mr. Mills also described some of the bene6- agencies in the county to sign
vial effects of the Santa Ana River Madnstmn on to these BMPIV 13 have
Project,which includes enlargement of Prado already done ur.
Dam as well as the reservoir and wetlands areas Mr.Aghjayan translated the
behind it.These improvements will inerease the concept of"water conserva-
amount of storm flow that can be gathered tion"into a"water supply"for
behind the dam for controlled release into Orange County using the example of the Willis.Mills,
Orange County,allowing mare of the local Steering Committee's most ambitious program to Orange County
resource to be captured in the Orange County date.l7irough the action of Use committees
Water District.
basin and used,and less to be lost to the ocean. member agencies,55,000 toilets per year for 5
Water quality degradation in the upper area of years—275,000 total—will be replaced in
the watershed.especially in the Chino Basin area Continued oil Page 6
-5-
Continued from Page 5 For water transfers to become a significant
Orange County with free,ultra low Rush models. component of water resource management in
The resulting water savings would free up enough California,a multitude of institutional and policy
water to supply 20,000 additional Orange County considerations must be addressed including:
households. s Protecting the communities in the area-of-
orfgfn of a water transfer.
Water Tmrufere s Ensuring that opportunities to use transfers to
Matthew Stone,Associate General Manager take advantage of inexpensive water when it is
of the Municipal Water District of Orange County, available do not displace water agencies'
followed with an update on water transfers. maintenance of effort in conservation,
Water transfers—or,exchanges or sales of water reclamation,and desalination programs.
or water rights among those who have them and ♦ Water rights implications and complications,
those who want or need them—are part of an such as how,those who obtain rights to water
integrated resources planning approach(as through transfers,have adequate assurance
contrasted with a more traditional,dam-and- that they will actually be able to retrieve and
divert approach). Mr. Stone emphasized that use it.
transfers are likely to • Variations in water
he needed in addition quality,which affect
to all of the efforts the usability of a
described by the other water supply for the
u r presenters, '9 want to congratulate you rah this conference. purposes intended by
succhh as a
- such storage, It's ualliImportantm someone opportunity fa ,take sure that someone who
conservation.reclama- Orange Counly continues to he at the table on acquired it.
than,etc. the aaja'decisions that we're about to make s Water"wheeling"
Water touters could here fit California and certainly of the arrangements—or,
be especialh'useful and Metropolitan Water District. Change is here, how water is physi-
appnprriale fur Sonthem clange is fry the air; Metropolitan is going to be °ally moved from the
seller's location to the
California because ready,and I sense that Orange County is going buverc—will have to
largr-eapacih convey- to be ready, tor." be worked out in
:nee p"Mc.Such as, order for the water
the California A ue- —RoNATM CAST LVM,
I market in California
duct and Ibc Colorado Cencml Manager, to really open up
Riser Aqueduct, could Atef epolitan Water District of'Sonf cirri California beyond local basin
by used m gti water borders. Mr. Stone
front Inc:aions adjacent mentioned that the
to thing pmlc(N And,wdthin Sodhem Cali- California legislature carried over brain 1999 it
fornia t tr;war Counh'is particularly well suited hill—S.B.506—intended to address issues of
to tu6, :a l.:u a:w_•of slater transfers.The counh hov the owners and operators of water camec-
has cud, con rand storage ellpacity,which is ance facilities should be compensated for use
y:Juabb in 1111 water transfer arena because of their facilities,and on what terns thev
w:uer i.ohrup, 't to acquire when it is the most should have to make those facilities available
pleutibil.Tho eomuumities that can take greatest for conveyance of water by others.
adcan�mi ..I v.itor hans(ers will be the ones[hat Ocean and Brackish Desalination
cxu argoirr ILr w�drr when it is nsdlable and
inexpensisv and store it somewhere until it is Ronald Unsky, Director of the National
most needed. Water Research Institute,discussed the latest
deselopments in desalination.
Progress in the implementation of desalina-
than has been much greater in the Middle East
and in island nations than in California. Never-
theless,improvenhents fit the technology and
More then r„p economics of desalination have significmt
160 attended it for widening its potential here.
tlw conference, i'• '
represenKng During the 1990s,the production of reverse
bastnc.sea. osmosis membranes used in a desalination plant
cities,end lutes improved.The frequency with which
water Infematr membranes have to be replaced has decreased,
throughout and so has the amount of pressure required to
Orange fnunfy farce water through the membranes.In addition,
—6—
the actual membrane cost has dropped from communities of interest to _—
approximately$1,000 to about$200 per reverse communicate with their state.
osmosis element. level policy makers.
But in addition to—and. Mn Linsky empha- Itis essential,said Assembly,
sized,just as important as—de advances that arm Ackerman,that people in A
have reduced the costs of membranes,there Orange County pay attention 4 •-
have been innovations in the financing and not only to local concerns,but
management of desalination facilities. lie told also to statewide matters. j:...
the story of the development of the neu, Failure to do so can lead to
desalination facility that will supply the Tampa unwanted state policies or to
Bay area of Florida.There,a private contractor missed opportunities for state
is building the facility and selling the water to assistance. He also eneaur-
the city water utility at a guaranteed price per aged the attendees to pw
gallon—a process known as Build Own, attention to matters that aim
Operate,and Transfer(BOOT).The Tampa not mention the word water"
project allowed the contractor to lower its costs but,nevertheless,are closely
of raising capital by taking advantage of tax- related.As an example,he discussed the Professor William
exempt financing.The combination of financing legislative and gubernatorial hsftiadws currently Blomgrdst is
:and management innovations has the price of being promoted to support"infrastructure" Chair of the
desaltedl outer for Tampa dance NWBI Knowledge to about 5560 improvements. Since water supply,wastewater Managemna
per acre-foot,which,in Southern California. treatment,Laid so on are parts of the states infra- Comminee and
would make it a very competitive option. structure,local communities need to think about serves oa fruit!.
Although most people Larry think of the paten- lace`'to cormnuticate their infrastructure needs tatorfor 4Toom
tia l for desalination in terms of coastal communi_ and concerns in Sacramento. on Orange
ties. Mn Linsky pointed out illcundusion that Former Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle, now CoantylL Wager
not Only near water can be rendered usable by President of Pringle&Associates Consulting, Future."
desalination.Areas vdth highly mineralized followed with advice on Imw to communicate
groundwater,land even inland sh'e:uns and rivers effectiveb with legislators. Based on his experi-
with excessive salt content,could gain usable ence as:a legislator;and now as an individual who
water supplies through desalting wchnolOgy, represents various interests befinc the.legisla-
lure,he addressed the following points:
Making Ourselves Heard 6 Communicate clearly who you are. Don't
While there is much M be done to enhance just identity vonrself and lour organization;
water reliability and yualit'at the local level, rather,explain what connection von and your
state and federal Fars. regulations,funding,and organizntion have to that legislator and his or
programs all affect Orange Counh�and can do her district. Each Assembly member has more
so even more in\aces than 90g000 people in
to come. Several the district to listen to,
conference presenters each state senator has
stressed the import- "We in Orange Countyy are as lied to the Santa nearly a trillion people
ante of organizing and Ana Bit er ns all of.Southern California is tied to to listen to,and each
maintaining a Netter Blebopnlitrm and file renter importation system. county official in
South
coordinated and more represents
Californiandr
lli•eruh hwk nI our renter finhux midm°t represents hundreds of
effective approach to Iaaking at Ihis watershed.- thousands Or even
communicating Orange millions of people.
COuntys needs and -R ILLIAM \I ELLS,
concems in those state Therefore,that des
!k•nrrnl:1lnnnger Ormgr Gunny Al tiler Olsb'tvl
and federal forums. makeell to than decision
maker with that context
The audience and in mind,
Participants received some valuable advice from 6 Explain clearly and concisely what you are
state legislators.Assembhumn Richard talking about. State legislators vote on 5,000
Ackerman,who represents the,2nd Assembly bills a vem,and are constantly having to shift
District,encompassing the Orange Count from one subject to another.They have limit-
communities of Brea,Fullerton. Placentia,and ell time to listen,and they almost certainly do
Yorba Linda,spoke to the conference about the not share your expertise or fascination with
developments that led to the legislatures passage the subject matter you are bringing to them.
You have to find a way to explain your issues
in 1999 0l'Proposition 13,a major bond issue and ideas as simply and as appropriately as
that appeared on the March 1,2000 dadlot. He possible.Tell them exactiv what it means,but
also emphasized the importance for local Continued on Page 6
Conflnued from Nge 7 Comprehensive Water Reclamation and
not with the detail or in the jargon with which you Reuse Study,for which he is resporuibk:,
are familiar.Furthermore,you may have to do this Mr.Kacnwer stated that the study had
more than once,since time passes between stages established that a regional coalition can
of the legislative process and that legislator will be very effective if it assembles and
have dealt with many other matters in between. marshals support for an entire array of
a Understand when you need to reach(hem. projects,rather than fighting a zero-sum
Make your first approach to them eadp on in an battle in which one community's gain is -'y'A"�• `
issue,before party lines and caucus positions perceived to be its neighbors loss.
solidify. For instance,once legislators decide On a more local scale.Stan OPelie,
upon a party caucus position on a bill,your Chief Executive Officer of the Orange
ability to change a legislator's mind has been County Business Council.encouraged
greatly diminished. Orange County water agencies to develop
a Don forget to convey why your issue and your a unified message and promote that Steven Just.",
point of view is important to them. Know the message among the business cominuniN as way U.S.Buraaa of
legislator's philosophy and frame your issue in a of building more effective coalitions. Reclamation.
wm that the legislator can understand why they With a coordinated message, Mr. ORelie
should vote for it and continued,the water
how they can explain agent'community
their vote(to would find a very nespon-
Ibemselves as well as `Hou• important ix toner In the Lushness size partner in the
others). Let them voi a maitg and to the general puLlh•P Orange County business
know,for example, I'm enarinred that if nv if....I'd du•(inter(and fit, comnumih'.Two of the
why your position is a Irawr didn't cams•out. or if tre flashed the toilet largest businesses In
worthwhile cause for
a conservative rail it rlirin'I frorA. if fit l our water systennx and Orange County have
Republican unit our sru,, syWemx Larked up the fray our f i"ca!p told him that water is as
liberal Democrat. Lark up, dun,' i uld fir peoplr.elandbng out fit important to them in
rant u t our house 1,ill, loe,hrs'. rleruruulin r that elechicity.Turning to
At the federal level, f f./ R Steven er.Plan- you cam e our sitfhcy ouuld lynch yu° the water a•envy
P representatives at the
ning Offfiicerver far the conference,be said.
Lmver Colorado Region -5t'ws Oi�n:i.u;,
lCdr ren Orange Cnnnn ,ss Caunrit your mess;�ige—with
of the U.S. Bureau of f Execulfre O O
>� g J B,Wn legislators and other
Reclamation,under- decision makers—
to be the advantages s would be much room
that gained to Washbuild or join
be local communities effective if ou had people like that convewing your
that are able to build urjnin regional coalitions' inessage on soar behalf.
IJesaihing the 13un•:ms Sauthem Cal(louiu For further
Mr. Oftelie added that there is an effective, inf.em.tion about
important,and successful water community in Fouts al+
Orange Connh% but it has not been part of the Orange County',.
general business community. Nate,Future.
Agreeing. Rupert Bein,Chairman of the Infrn-
please contact:
: structure Committee of the Orange Couny'
Business Council,encouraged his colleagues in the•
William Rlomquist,
wvterbusiness to overcome their tendency Indiana University-
to Purdue University
communicate primarily with one another. "You all at Indianapolis
about Colorado River, B:n'/Delta.and
fn groundwater, lie
to said,"but many you have (317) 274-7547
token the time to speak at Kiwniwa mis or Potxnt visit Fax:(317)275-3250E-mail:
�• �� � your city council member or side legislator'?We blomquitaiupui.edu
• need to ge(the word out."Water.be concluded,is
•i probable the primary issue v e face for the eco- or
nomic health of Southern California. m Karl Seekel,
f Municipal
x_ Nato District of
The Orange County Water.Cnrrfemnce,sponxoned Orange County
by a dozen public and private organizations.wen (714) 593-5024
the f rst r fan annual series. Watch this neimletter Fax:(714)964-9359
_ fin-Infommtion about the see, nd conference,to be Eanailt
held late in 2000, kseckelOmwdoc.com
Daily Pilot Page 1 of 3
1 . r NEWS News z co
a , I want my new day
camera TODAY! Pick a category ZJ
Thursday, May 11, 2000
The nerdle connoisseur
■ Recently identified source of beach pollution has
been part of lifeguard's quirky collection for
decades.
ByALEX COOLMAN
They were a big surprise in a report released lost
month about beach pollution: hundreds of
thousands of tiny plastic pellets, scattered across the
sands of the Orange County coastline in for greater
numbers than anyone had suspected.
But to Eric Bauer, they were no surprise at all.
Bauer, who worked as a junior lifeguard in
Huntington Beach in the 1970s and is today a
lifeguard lieutenant with the Newport Beach Fire
and Marine Department, says he's been collecting
the plastic pellets for decades.
Among those who know about them, Bauer says,
the objects even have a name, a term with a
diminutive tone perfectly fitting to their tiny size.
Nerdles.
If you've never heard of nerdles, it's not because
they're rare.
The pinhead-size pellets, which are the raw
material for industrial production of a wide variety of
plastic products, end up on beaches after they
become trapped in urban runoff, Bauer said.
And they show up in very large quantities.
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project,
which last month released a study detailing the
types of garbage found on Orange County's
beaches, collected 105 million of them in just two
http://www,latimes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000
Daily Pilot Page 2 of 3
months.
The sheer volume of these plastic pebbles was in
fact one of the most remarkable findings of the
report, said Shelly Moore, a marine biologist with the
group.
But because nerdles are so small, Moore said,
they have a way of escaping the attention of the
average beachgoer.
"Most people aren't looking for them, and they're
not real easy to see."she said. "They blend in real
well with the sand° because they tend to be white
or clear in color and not much larger than the grains
of sand themselves.
Fortunately for the progress of science, Bauer has
been paying very close attention.
In a special jar he keeps at home, Bauer has
amassed a prize nerdle collection. He's got dozens
of the run-of-the-mill clear, black or white nerdles,
but he also has a select few in hard-to-find colors
like blue, green and the extremely elusive red.
The jar also houses a small plastic doll, another
artifact from his beach scouring. The icon keeps
watch over the collection.
"She's 'Nerdle Spice,' " Bauer noted.
For a long time, Bauer said, the origin of the
pellets was shrouded in mystery.
Some people thought they were bits of
coagulated wax from surfboards, he said. Others
thought they were used on container ships as a sort
of ball bearing-style device to help move heavy
loads.
The most arcane theory, Bauer said, held that
they were the tears of squid.
A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report
released in 1992 cleared up some of the ambiguity
about where exactly nerdles came from. The report
also noted that nerdles, far from being a problem
limited to California, are found on beaches all over
the world.
There are nerdles in Costa Rica. There are nerdles
in the Sargasso Sea. Nerdles wash up in Alaska and
they pepper the coast of Lebanon.
But Newport Beach, especially around the Santa
Ana River mouth, is a particularly rich hunting
ground, Bauer says.
And while that's not really anything to be proud
of—the pellets are pollution, after all — It does make
http://www.lahmes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000
Daily Pilot Page 3 of 3
this area fertile ground for a nerdle obsession.
Just don't go expecting to find a red one unless
you've got a lot of time to look.
Feedback to dailvoiloK_?latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/tcn/pilot/news/20000511/tdp0008268.html 05/11/2000
• 1 � � 1 � 1
aim �mmmsg
~►��.tREM—v7:liaiy't�wl ..-I
ay f a.
M' sawr . W�IY T�'7•J....^in:�xq ri•.° Sr'n' im
r \r:N
Oki
AF
`� �! ,4�L"i•�:: 7rC,.,e:u %�y:~ra'.•`'.-'+a�T;'�.i ~;Y.`;I
eX.
q.
.ii.�or{e w��l .��•'N: 1 Rid_•°
,,r •p�,il':i.�Yi1 il%11""nl-���U:..��9� 1
lia Mil,
1♦ ..I���i tiN 4ra.i.au• ♦• .•�•
udYr��r♦s1 5,4.��i
Y -
.11
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,IRVINE
i
BERI(ELET . DAVIS . IRVINE . LOS ANGELES , RIVERSIDE $AN DIEDD SAN FlIANCISCO 1 • SAMABA0.BARA $.VfIA C0.UZ
t
School of Social Ecology 300 Social Ecology I
Irvine,CA 92697-7050
April 5,2000
Board of Directors
Jan Debay, Chair
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Dear Ms. Debay:
Thank you for your gift of the lab equipment to support the work being done at
Environmental Analysis and Design. On behalf of the School of Social Ecology at the
University of California, Irvine, we would like to thank you for your generosity. We
apologize for not acknowledging your contribution sooner.
We appreciate the recognition of the importance of our research, for it can only be
achieved through gifts and support such as yours.
Sincerely,
ppi
Kelley Lun&&
Director, External Relations
School of Social Ecology
Date: April 13, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District
Monthly Log of Odor Complaints
PLANT N0. 1 2000 yy p
5i �a s fck
Nava" Dec §� Jan a s Feb �e Mar a A r May Jun Jul a n Au Sao las Oct a
11/15 no 12111 yes 1/6 no 3121 no 4/6 yes
12125 n0 3/21 ❑o 4/25 e5
4/zs es
plant
related
Total: 0 1 0 0 0 3
PLANT NO. 2 2000
Nov u Dec € ° Jan 3° Feb a z Mar s° A r a' May a c Jun 1.2 Jul & Auga a See a a Oct
11/13 n0 12/7 no 2/3 no 3/4 as 4/20 no 5/3 BS
12 no 2/10 es 3/17 no 4/27 es A3
12/29 no 2/13 es 4/29 no
2/19 no
plant
related 2/20 no
Total: PPO 0 0 2 1 1 1
Collection Systems 2000
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct
11/5 12114 1/3 218 312 4113
11/9 12123 1/3 2/15 3/6 4114
11/15 12/28 1/6 2/28 3115 4/18
11/15 12/28 1/10 4/26
11/15 125 4/28
11/15 1/27
1/23
Coll.: Total 7 Total 4 Total 6 Total 3 Total 3 Total 5 Total Total Tatal Total Total M-t-I
RJO:YSH:ctll
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
May 24, 2000 —7:00 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for
discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
05/24100
Page 2
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular
June Board Meeting).
8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on
April 26, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/00 04/30/00
Totals $5.694,661.78 $5,794,492.22
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon
recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent
Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
a. Receive and file summons and complaint, Mladen Buntich Construction
Company v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 000005719, for breach of contract in connection with Improvements to
Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, and refer to General
Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
05/24/00
Page 3
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 24, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on April 26, 2000 to be filed.
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee re May 3, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 3, 2000 to be filed.
C. Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for Purchase
of Storage Area Network, Specification No. E-277, in connection with the
Computerized Facility Atias and Document Management Project,
Job No. J-25-1, to upgrade a portion of the District's networking infrastructure,
for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85.
d. Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the
operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all
sales, maintenance costs of$900 per month, and $90 per hour for emergency
maintenance services, effective July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in a forth
approved by General Counsel.
e. 1) Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty repair
on eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a total project
budget cost not to exceed$150,000; and 2)Authorize staff to award a sole
source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services, Inc. for warranty repair work
to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total amount not to exceed
$150,000.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
May 4, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—
NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
May 4, 2000 to be fled.
C. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, for a total revised project budget of$3,475,762;
(2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-41.1, with Advanco Constructors, Inc, authorizing an addition of$92,891
and 85 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,390,547; and
(3)Accept Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41,1, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final
Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
05/24/00
Page 4
d. (1)Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to Electrical and
Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, to
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444
(Rebid), for a total revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1444
(Rebid); (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444 (Rebid), with Ark Construction
Company, authorizing an addition of$47,289, and a time extension of 40
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $954,229; and (3)Accept
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444
(Rebid), with Ark Construction Company as complete, authorizing execution of
the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science,
Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2,
Job No. J-35-2, for an amount not to exceed $2,255,680.
f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch for design of
Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for a total amount not to exceed
$2,208,810.
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re May 10, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 10, 2000 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000.
d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2000.
e. Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the
period ending March 31, 2000.
f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-09, Amending Resolution
No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures
Manual.
g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-10, Amending Resolution
No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures
Manual, providing for. (1) Create Accounting Supervisor classification at pay
range Ell ($60,828-$86,064); (2) Create Human Resources Supervisor
classification at pay range Ell ($50,828-$86-064); (3) Create Lead Pump
Power Operator at pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883); and, (4) Change the title
of Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator.
h. Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities Capacity Charge
rate and structure until the Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Program is
modified.
05/24/00
Page 5
i. Approve an increase for the Temporary Employment Services contracts total
amount from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for FY 99-00, and approve funding in
the amount of$1,900,000 for FY 00-01.
16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee re May 15, 2000 meeting.
b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The
Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 17, 2000 to be filed.
17. Actions re Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 2-41:
a. Verbal report by Director of Engineering
b. Verbal report by General Counsel
C. Receive and file written comments, if any
d. Open public hearing
e. Close public hearing
f. Discussion by Board
g. Continue to July 19, 2000 regular Board Meeting for consideration of the final
EIR.
18. Actions re approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of the
Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46:
a. Verbal report by Director of Engineering
b. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-11, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less
than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 5-46; Approving Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project;
Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project; and Adopting
a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
19. Ordinance No. OCSD-13, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County
Sanitation District Amending Ordinance No. OCSD-05 Re Continuing and Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Amending Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06
re Class I and Class II Industrial Waste Discharger Permittee Charges for Use, and
Repealing Ordinance No, OCSO-10:
a. (1) Implement Sewer Service Charge rates for 2000-01 equal to those
previously adopted for Revenue Area 3. These rates will be based upon
05/24/00
Page 6
the single-family residential rate of$78 per year and the percentages
adopted in Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Previously adopted higher rates in
other Revenue Areas may be implemented as needed in the future.
(2) Implement previously adopted Sewer Service Charge rates in Revenue
Area 7. The base single-family residential rate to be $73 per year.
(3) Change flow parameters for non-residential users.
(4) Set flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Suspended Solids
(SS) rates for Source Control Permit Users.
b. Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 2, 2000.
C. Make finding that adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-13 is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines
Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the
revenues to be received will be used to meet operational and maintenance
expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined
service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
d. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-13 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be
adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.)
e. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-13, and pass to second reading and
public hearing on June 28, 2000.
20.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed
session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board
takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
05/24/00
a Page 7
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development
Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)).
2. Confer with General Counsel and District's designated representative
(Chair Jan DeBay) re salary, compensation and benefits to be paid to
the new General Manager, Blake P. Anderson (Government Code
Section 54957.6).
3. Confer with District's Labor Negotiators (Human Resources
Representative and General Manager) re salaries, benefits, terms and
conditions of employment for employees represented by IUOE- Local
501 and SPMT Unit (Government Code Section 54957.6)
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
21. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
22. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
23. Adjournment
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of
business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the
agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all
formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411,.ext. 7130
H:bry.dtMager VBmrd Agendas�2000 Swrd Agendas\0524 .do
BOARD OF DIRECTORS n ngoBeB Tn Btl.afgr.
gS/29/B0
AGENDA REPORT RM Number I 1f MMWr
7
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary
SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board
Meeting)
SUMMARY
As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at
the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June
meeting.
Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular
meeting.
For new Directors' information, we have included below an excerpt from the current
Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of
the Joint Administrative Organization.
"G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A
Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of
Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1 st.
The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of
each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications
for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board
of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting.
The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular
Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the
election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st.
The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority
of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to
resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the
Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall
continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by
action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson
becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election
of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board
Mby.EUYp"M"1BerN•exN"R�N I .R"pNa�].0
Rw e¢BAB Page 1
meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term
unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors.
Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the
Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms
for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson."
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Hby.�A�R"p.Mc\lpb RwN Ag RlpMb�)0%
R. °'m'°° Page 2
' tl
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
APRIL 26, 2000
v�Ja�v AHITgI�oy
FCr,HQ HT EN�����
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 2
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on April 26, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
A Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson
Peer Swan,Vice Chair X Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow
X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall
X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore
A Brian Donahue Harry Dotson
X Norman Z. Eckenrode Michael L Maertzweiler
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Peter Green Dave Garofalo
X John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon
X Joy Neugebauer Margie L. Rice
X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi
A Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
X Christina Shea Greg Smith
X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller
X Jim Silva Chuck Smith
X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates
X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob
Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Mike Moore; Mark Esquer; Catherine
Biele; Paula Zeller, Kent C. Nelson; Jim Elo; Emilio Ariston
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Ralph Bauer, Nancy Donavan;
Sandra L. Genis; Phil Stone; Terry Lane; James Thurber; Walid Koram
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 3
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
In the absence of the Chair and Vice Chair, a motion was made, seconded and adopted
unanimously to appoint Director Pat McGuigan as Chair pro tem.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Emilio Ariston, a District's employee, handed out a written statement addressed to the Board
and spoke to the Directors by reading the letter. He stated his objection to the staff and
management handling of a"grievance" he had filed against the District on December 28, 1999.
The letter, with attachments,were made part of the record of this meeting. The basic issue
concerned a problem-solving action and not a grievance as defined in the District's Human
Resources policies. As a non-agenda item, no action was taken.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
Chair pro tem McGuigan recognized Ralph Bauer, councilmember of the City of Huntington
Beach. Mr. Bauer informed the Directors that Chair Jan Debay, while attending a meeting of
SCAG in Los Angeles today, became ill and was transported to a hospital in the area. Chair
Debay was resting comfortably and would be transported to Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach
the following day.
Director McGuigan referred the Directors to a supplemental agenda item that was placed in the
meeting folders, as well as a letter from the City of Garden Grove in opposition of rate
consolidation.
It was then announced that the OMITS Committee members would be meeting in the lobby of
the administration building on May 3p and take a walking tour of the District's Laboratory prior to
the meeting. The PDC Committee members will meet at Plant 2 in Huntington Beach on May
4"for a tour of several proposed projects prior to their meeting.
The Distrito received an award from the California Water Environment Association's (CWEA)
Engineering and Research Committee. They selected the District's "Peak Flow Management
Plan" as the 1999 Best Engineering Wastewater Project in the State of California. Staff
members Jim Herberg, Larry Kraemer, Mark Esquer, Ron Wade, Jim Elo, Angie Anderson and
Dan Tunnicliff were recognized for their efforts in the development of this plan, as well as
consultants Paul Gustafson of Camp Dresser McGee, Duane Jensen and Walid Karam of
Carollo Engineers and Jack Campbell of CPG, Inc.
Chair pro tem McGuigan then reported that Chair Debay has appointed Directors Steve
Anderson, Russell Patterson and Shawn Boyd as aftemate directors to the Joint Groundwater
Replenishment System Cooperative Committee.
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution
of Commendation expressing appreciation to General Manager Donald F. McIntyre for his
contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 4
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Mr. McIntyre reported that Supplemental Agenda Item No. (21)(a), (b) and (c) , which is the
approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Orange and City of Huntington
Beach regarding on-going investigations on the beach closures,was a coordinated effort to
address urban run-off and any monies to be spent on the investigations would be brought to the
Board for approval.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel reported that the District received a favorable court ruling regarding a District's
employee who, after voluntary termination, requested to return to work. The court ruled that the
Human Resources Department followed proper procedures and upheld management's decision
to not allow the employee to return.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 22, 2000 is deemed
approved, as corrected.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/00 03/31/00
Totals $5,300,788.21 $3,946,010.00
CONSENT CALENDAR
9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to
execute a quitclaim deed for a 15-foot wide by 213.77-foot long sewer easement
to Plantero Drive LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, in a form
acceptable to General Counsel.
b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the
Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment
System with the Orange County Water District, providing for appointment of
alternate Directors in lieu of the General Manager to the Joint Cooperative
Committee.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Amend Board Minutes of
December 15, 1999 relative to approving a project with Ashbrook Corporation to
evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit at no cost to the District, and the
subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an approximate cost of
$125,000 contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4%improvement in cake
solids.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 5
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director
Pat McGuigan, Chair pro tem of the Steering Committee, re the April 26, 2000 meeting.
The Chair pro tem then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meetings
held on March 22, 2000 and April 3,2000 to be filed.
C. Item removed from agenda
12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the April 5, 2000
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 5, 2000 to be fled.
C. Garry Brown of the Orange County Coastkeepers, spoke to the Directors in
support of the proposed policy. Sandra Genis of the Boise Chica Land Trust also
spoke to the Directors in support of the polity, and encouraged the Board to
consider extending the policy as the District's capacity expands.
Directors then entered into a brief discussion regarding procedures, costs, and
the protection of the District's NPDES permit.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-04, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-05, Declaring Support for Biosolids Application, and Repealing
Resolution No. OCSD 99-03.
13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A
verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee, re the April 6, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions
taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes
for the meeting held April 6, 2000 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment
increase of$84,931 to Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job
No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,166,205; (2) Ratify Change
Order No.4 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job
No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of$1,034 and 69
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $717,866; and (3)Accept
Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with
Systems Integrated as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 6
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract
No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$130,622
and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,593,409.
e. - MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 2 to
Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39,
with Margate Construction, for an addition of$552,000, increasing the total
contract amount to $10,057,256.
f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve sole source Professional
Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for on-call computer
services necessary to update and maintain computer models developed under
the 1999 Strategic Plan, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.
Director Mark Murphy abstained.
g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for design and study of Peak Flow
Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-67, for a total amount not to
exceed $283,280.
h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services
for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4,for an amount not to
exceed $845,300.
I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers for professional
engineering services for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job
No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $308,212; and (2)Approve a budget
amendment of$2,594,000 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment,
Job No. P2-82, for a total project budget of$3,394,000.
j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services
for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, and Atwood
Subtrunk Improvements, Contract No. 2-50, for a total amount not to exceed
$504,685.
k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C.
for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1,
providing for additional consulting services in the amount of$459,703 for a total
amount not to exceed $2,788,384.
Director Mark Murphy abstained.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 7
I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 5 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for
Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional
engineering services, for an additional amount of$420,000, increasing the total
amount not to exceed$5,516,830.
14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the
Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 12, 2000
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 12, 2000 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of March 2000.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-06,Authorizing Formation of the Orange County Sanitation District
Financing Corporation and Authorizing Certain Related Actions.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-07, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human
Resources and Policies Procedures Manual.
15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE
COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, a
member of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re
the meetings held on March 20 and April 17,2000.
The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 20, 2000, to be filed.
16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve License Agreement with the
Orange County Water District for the construction and operation of Water Factory 21
Groundwater Injection Well and Conveyance Facilities from the Orange County Water
District, at no cost to the District, in form approved by General Counsel.
17. FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION OF REVENUE AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A
SINGLE USER FEE RATE
Director Mark Leyes referred the Directors to a copy of a letter from the City of Garden
Grove that was included in their meeting folders. He expressed concern regarding the
economic issues surrounded by the rate consolidation and diminished accountability.
After discussion among the Directors a substitute motion was made to delay
consideration of the rate consolidation until May 24, 2000. The motion failed by a vote of
6 ayes to 13 nays.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 8
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve consolidation of Revenue Areas
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 for fiscal year 2000-01, including the postponement of portions of
user fee increases previously adopted through 2001-02, as set forth in detail in the staff
agenda report of April 26,2000.
The motion passed by a vote of 18 ayes to 4 nays.
18. CEQA ACTIONS RE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41
A brief report was given by Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering regarding the CEQA
process and proposed alternatives re the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and
Protection, Contract No.2-41.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish May 24, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. at
the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time, and place, for the public hearing on
the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation
And Protection, Contract No. 2-41; and (2) Establish May 31, 2000, as the final date for
which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the
Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No.241.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: The Chair requested that Item 21 be considered
at this time.
21. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize consideration of Item
21(b) and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda
and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code
Section 54954.2(b)(2).
b. Director of Technical Services reported that the proposed Memorandum of
Understanding with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach
defines the roles in the investigations into the beach closures and does not
obligate the District in any way.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Memorandum of
Understanding with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach re
future procedures and continuing beach closure investigations as originally
authorized by Board action of January 26, 2000.
19. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government
Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item
Nos. 19(a)(1) and (2).
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
54956.9 AND 54957: The Board convened in closed session at 9:10 p.m., pursuant to
Govemment Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session
held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government
Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken
re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(1). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 19a)(3), and no
report was given.
Minutes for Board Meeting
04/26/00
Page 9
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:17 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session.
19. a. 2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-08, Amending General Manager's Contract of Employment.
Directors Gullixson and Bankhead opposed.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m.
Secretary jjhe Board irectors of
Orange County Sanita ion District
H:Wwp.Aa1agendaSm,d MinthsUG00 Burd M1nWm%042000.d=
Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on
Accounts Payable-Warrants
25950 Court Order $ 741.50 Wage Garnishment
25951 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
25952 Duthie Penner Services 81,691.74 Generator Supplies
25953 Orange County Sanitation District 420.253.14 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
25954 OII 5th Partial Consent Decree Escrow Account 95.799.00 Operating Industries,Inc.Landfill,Superfund Site Settlement
25955 Southern California Edison 60,081.26 Power
25956 Allied PacMng 8 Rubber,Inc. 187.72 Mechanical Supplies
25957 American Airlines 7,670.07 Travel Services
25958 American Express 12,523.82 Purchasing Card Program
25959 ARKTechnologies 5,285.00 Data Processing
259W American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 12.03 Telephone Service
25961 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
25962 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
259W Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
25964 Compu Master 895.00 Registration
25965 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 502.23 Plumbing Supplies
25988 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 225.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
p 25987 CWEA Annual Conference 200.00 Conference Registration
25968 D.R.McNatty B Associates 2.190,00 Registration-Software Training
H. 25969 The Delphi Group 1.080.00 Registration
rt 25970 Employment Development Dept. 4,251.92 Reimbursable Unemployment Costs
25971 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
25972 ESRI,Inc. 800,00 Training Registration
25973 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment
25974 Ganahl Lumber Company 165.63 Lumber/Hardware
25976 GTE California 2,203.98 Telephone Services
25976 Hach Company 351.53 Chemicals
25977 Industrial Metal Supply 1,321.09 Metal
25978 Industrial Plastic Supply, Inc 693.88 Plastic Window for Scrubbers
25979 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc 88.17 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
25980 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.46 Dues Deduction
25981 ICOM Amedca,Ina 92.15 Lab Supplies
25902 Alrgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div, 2,739.30 Safely Supplies
25983 J.D. Edwards 400.011 FIS 1099 Processing Training
25984 League of Ca.Cities,Orange County Div. 40.00 Meeting Expense
25M McMaster-Can Supply Co. 3,381.95 Tools
25986 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 5,915.00 Training Registration
25987 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 6,445.97 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies
25988 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
25989 Orange County Marshall 110.00 Wage Garnishment
26990 OCFA 686.20 Dues Deduction
25991 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
25992 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
25993 Peace Officers Council of CA 765.00 Dues Deduction
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 311100 to 3116100
Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description
25994 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 156.55 Paint Supplies
25995 So.Cal.Gas Company 7,424.39 Natural Gas
25996 SoftView Computer Products 1,044.21 Computer Supplies
25997 SoftChoice 2,753.32 Software
25995 Southern California Air Cond.Dist. 60.22 Electrical Supplies
25999 Southern California Academy of Sciences 90.00 Registration
26000 State of Califomia 149.82 Wage Garnishment
26001 Summit Steel 620.33 Metal
26002 Mark A.Tomko 253.53 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
26003 United Way 432.60 Employee Contributions
26004 Nicholas J.Amontes 237.18 Meetingrl-ralning Expense Reimb.
26005 Bradley H.Cagle 1,556.39 Copying/Duplicating Expense Reimb.
26006 Andrel loan 255.28 Meeting?reining Expense Reimb.
26007 Turn L.Josway 528.05 Meeting/Treining Expense Reimb.
26000 Julie A.Matsumoto 357.44 MeetingRraining Expense Reimb.
26009 Michael D.White 408.47 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26010 In-N-Out 6W.00 Catering Services-Y2K Celebration
26011 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage
26012 RPI/Blo Gro 112,058.89 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
26013 Blue Cross of California 172,208.64 Medical Insurance Premium
26014 Calif Centrifugal Pump 34,806.62 Pump Supplies
26015 City of Newport Beach 247,359.75 Construction Reimbursement Agreement 5.41
26016 City of Santa Ana 30,916.00 Connection Fee Refund
26017 Canputerized Facility Integration 174,689.90 Engineering Service J-25-1
26018 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying,Inc. 32,577.28 Engineering Services P-183
28019 K.S.Dunbar 8 Associates 28,375.00 Engineering Services 241
26020 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium
26021 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 37,644.81 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
26022 Moo Analytical System 41,830.80 Professional Services-Hunt.Beach Closure
26023 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 27,202.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99
26024 Nat West Markets 64,207.57 COP Letter of Credit Fees
26025 Pro Logis Trust 60,899.00 Connection Fee Refund
20026 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 258,903.04 Ocean Monilodng MO 6.8-94
26027 Tula Ranch/Megan Farms 66,171.01 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
26025 Woodru8,Spradlin&Smart 44.432.90 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
26029 Ark Construction Company 198,688.00 Construction P1444
26030 Margate Construction,Inc. 650,447.64 Construction P2-39
26031 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 37,874.00 Construction P2-61
26032 S.S.Mechanical Corp 228,7a2.60 Construction P1 48.2 8 J-53
26033 Soulhem Contracting Company 84,522.00 Construction P2-47-1&J-33-1
26034 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 146,109.20 Construction 7.7.1
26035 Union Bank of California 25,420.31 Construction P146-2 8 J-53
26036 A-Plus Systems 5,302.45 Notices 6 Ads
26037 Air Cold Supply 44.32 Air CondSioner Supplies
26038 Airborne Express 202.12 Air Freight
Pepe 2 of r. -
Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
28039 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 2,800.00 Human Resources Service
28040 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 712.00 Lab Supplies
26041 Appleone Employment Service 3.450.05 Temporary Employment Services
26042 Applied Industrial Technology 1.182.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies
28043 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste Oil Removal
26044 Aspen Publishers, Inn 137.18 Publication
28045 Atlantis Pool Care 180.00 Service Agreement
26046 Awards&Trophies By Bea 83.03 Plaques
2e047 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 156.36 Office Supplies
26048 AMAI/Keye Productivity Center 229.00 Registration
26049 APEX Communicetlons 1,300.00 Security Equipment
26050 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 43.82 Telephone Service
26051 AT&T Wireless Services 34346 Cellular Telephone Service
26052 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service
26053 Battery Specialties 498.45 Batteries
26054 Ban Meadows Company,Inc. 96.21 Lab Supplies
26055 Bloomberg L.P. 5.301.30 Financial Monitoring M04.14-93
26056 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,228.26 Engineering Services 3-38-1
26057 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,846.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
26058 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 125.00 Membership
26059 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 9,709.00 Engineering Service J40-3
26060 Center for Watershed Protection 7.00 Publication
26061 Century Paint 367.56 Paint Supplies
26062 Charles P.Crowley Co. 436.96 Instrument Parts
26063 Compressor Components Of California 2.370.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
26064 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 899.97 Registration
26065 Connell GM Parts 105.07 Tmck Supplies
26M Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4,083.20 Electrical Supplies
26067 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 182.79 Plumbing Supplies
26068 Converse Consultants 264.00 Consulting Services 3-38-3
26069 Cooper Energy Services 181.15 Engine Supplies
26070 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,740.35 Copier Lease
26071 Corporate Express Imaging 350.19 Computer Supplies
26072 Corporate Express 254.39 Office Supplies
26073 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 981.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
26074 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 112.00 Communication Service Agreement
26075 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,419.67 Electrical Supplies
26076 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Conference Registration
26077 CWEA Membership $5.00 Membership
26078 David Rosenblatt 3511.011 Expert Panelist Raimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue
25079 David's Tree Service 5,040.D0 Tree Meint.Service
26080 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 10,547.85 3 Notebook Computers
26081 Da2udk C/O Misce/SouthWest 995.54 Valves
26082 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 164.43 Paint Supplies
26083 DOB Engineering,Inc. 11,844.00 Temporary Employment Services
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 311100 to 3115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26064 DGA Consultants,Inc. 144.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94
26085 Eberhard Equipment 214.78 Tractor Repair
26086 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 299.00 Medical Screening
26057 Electra-Bond 23,424.85 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
26088 Employers Group Service Corp. 585.00 Registration
26089 Enchanter,Inc. 2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
20D90 Environmental Express 1,643.72 Lab Supplies
26091 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 2,000.00 Training Registration
26092 FedEx Corporation 230.69 Air Freight
26093 Filter Supply Company 100.27 Filters
26094 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 454.85 Lab Supplies
28095 Flo-Systems,Inc 441.90 Pump Supplies
26096 Fountain Valley Camera 56.86 Photo Supplies
26097 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 211.00 Tmdr Wash Tickets
2BD98 Fountain Valley Points,Inc. 83.73 Point Supplies
26099 Foxboro Company 417.49 Instrument Supplies
26100 Pryer Seminars 195.00 Training Registration
26101 Fry's Electronics 501.B0 Computer Supplies
25102 FM International,Inc. 8.212.29 Professional Services J-25-1
28103 Garrett-Callahan Company 42.03 Chemicals
26104 GTE California 5,979.80 Telephone Services
28105 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 10.862.95 Belt,Filter Press Supplies
28106 Government Finance Officers Association 49.95 Publication
26107 WIN Grainger,Inc. 225.06 Compressor Supplies
20108 GBC(General Binding Corp) 226.04 Printing Service
26109 Hach Company 775AS Chemicals
26110 Herrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 424.07 Plumbing Supplies
26111 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 77.89 Catering Services
26112 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 1.573.43 Engineering Services 241
26113 Home Depot 225.13 Small Hardware
26114 Hub Auto Supply 294.45 Truck Parts
28115 lotus Consulting,L.L.C. 7.850.00 Records Management Program
25116 Imaging Plus,Inc. 8.00 Printing Service
26117 Industrial Metal Supply 312.78 Metal
26118 Informatics Corporation 6,000.00 Consultant Service-Final Effluent Quality
26119 Irvine Photo Graphics 28.49 Photographic Services
26120 IBM Corporation 6,060.D0 IBM AS/400 Y2K Hotsile
28121 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safely Div. 1,205.35 Safety Supplies
26122 J 8 B Auto Pens 9.83 Auto Pans 8 Supplies
26123 J B W Scientific 1,560.97 Lab Supplies
26124 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 6,320.96 Instrument Supplies
20125 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 1,991.22 Misc.Construction Services-Bubbler System Repair W Bay Badge P.S.
26126 Jay's Catering 700.47 Catering Services
26127 Johnstone Supply 329.13 Electrical Supplies
28128 Kamen Industrial Technologies 2.935.15 Mechanical Supplies
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26129 Knox 1.616.75 Tools
26130 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 224.37 Safety Supplies
26131 Lab Support 744.00 Temporary Employment Services
26132 Lee&Ro, Inc. 3,549.23 Engineering Consulting Services;-J47
26133 Liebert Cassidy 2.620.00 Professional Service-Human Resources
25134 LucGi's 47.50 Meeting Expense
26135 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc 13,140.00 Engineering Services Pl62
26135 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2.519.21 Mechanical Supplies
28137 The Marketing Group,Inc. 849.37 Lab Supplies
26138 MawVac Electronics 70.32 Instrument Supplies
26139 Akico Systems, Inc. 2,264.42 Communication Equipment Upgrade
26140 Me Junkin Corporation 609.07 Plumbing Supplies
26141 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,110.41 Tools
25142 Measurement Vanables,Inc. 436.T7 Filters
25143 Mid-West Associates 1,128.83 Pump Supplies
26144 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5.872.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
28145 Milknonica,Inc. 489.51 Electrical Supplies
26146 Mission Uniform Service 3.381.20 Uniform Rentals
26147 MotoPhoto 69.65 Photographic Services
26148 Mulliquip Z13 Freight Adjustment
26149 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association 50.00 Membership
26150 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,252.90 Instrument Supplies
26151 Neal Supply Co. 352.12 Plumbing Supplies
26152 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 2.511.93 Lubrirant'Diesel Fuel
26153 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 477.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO e-2498
26154 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
26155 Norrell Services,Inc. 224.06 Temporary Employment Service
26156 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,027.55 Office Supplies
26157 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 4.310-00 Electrical Parts&Supplies
26158 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 10.61 Plumbing Supplies
26159 Oxygen Service Company 919.39 Specialty Gases
26160 OCB Reprographics 5,459.64 Printing Service-Spec P-173
26161 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 453.71 Electrical Supplies
26162 Pacft Mechanical Supply 41.M.86 Plumbing Supplies
26163 Pagenet 2,037.63 Paging Services
26164 Polydyne,Inc. 22,884.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
26165 Port Supply 218.70 Rope
26186 Power Measurement Limited 13.025.00 Computer Supplies
28167 Praxair,Inc. 191.34 Welding Supplies
26168 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,189.82 Server Cleaning-Revenue Areal
25169 Pryor Resources,Inc 5,800.OD Training Registration
26170 Pump Engineering 2,748.35 Pump Supplies
28171 Pump Engineering Wor O Air 1,572.01 Compressor Supplies
26172 Quality Building Supply 210.55 Landscaping Supplies
26173 Ouanterta Environmental Services 2,328.00 Analytical Service
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 311100 to 3/15100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26174 Quickdeaning Janitorial Service 200.00 Groundskeeping Service
26175 Quidtstart Technologies 3,325.00 Professional Service-Software
26176 Rachel Noble 56.16 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt.Beach Issue
26177 Raney Industries 1,360.00 Contract Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification
26178 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1,412.00 Office Supplies
26179 Roto Rooter-N.O.C.4111 7,500.00 Sewer Line Repair
26180 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services-Tunnel Valve Access Platform
26131 RPM Electric Motors 19,908.94 Electric Motor Repair
26182 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 104.63 Paint Supplies
26183 Salety-Meen 4,193.00 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste
26184 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 1,920.13 Mechanical Supplies
26186 Saratoga Institute,Inc. 2.490.68 Publications
26186 Schwing America,Inc 74.72 Pump Supplies
26187 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 161.63 Specialty Gases
26188 Sears Industrial Sales 404.45 Mechanical Supplies
26189 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 6,212.76 Professional Services-Ocean Ou6all lnstmmentation
26190 Second-Sun 156.20 Light Fixtures
26191 Sencotec, Inc. 537.46 Electrical Supplies
26192 Shade Concepts 6.890.00 Awning Installation-Admin. Bldg.
26193 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,456.05 Tools/Hardware
26194 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.911.96 Natural Gas
26195 Southern California Edison 1,685,34 Power
28196 Southern Christian Leadership Conference 495.00 Notices&Ads
26197 Spading Instruments,Inc. 221.08 Instrument Supplies
26198 Spex Ceriprep,Inc. 251.31 Lab Supplies
26199 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 3,063.40 Pump Supplies
26200 Starbudc Tmdc Refinishing,Inc. 404.00 Painting Service
26201 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annex.Processing Fee
26202 Sunset Industrial Parts 812.15 Mechanical Supplies
26203 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
26204 Textile Engineering Associates 230.00 Belt Press Supplies
26205 The Orange County Register 847.80 Notices&Ads
26206 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,747.99 Mechanical Supplies
26207 Time Motion Tools 1493.48 Tools
26208 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services
26209 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 36.00 Lacks&Keys
26210 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,380.62 Truck Supplies
26211 Trueadeil Laboratories,Inc. 2,370.00 Lab Services
26212 Teksystems 2,295.20 Temporary Employment Services
26213 United Parcel Service 36.57 Parcel Services
25214 The University of Texas at Austin 450.00 Meeting Expense
26215 Unocal 76 58.22 Fuel for Vehicles-Conrad 3-38-1
26216 11-Line 234.63 Office Supplies
28217 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,409.83 Plumbing Supplies
26218 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 11,400.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Computer Programming
Page 6 of 7 a,
Claims Paid From 311100 to 3115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26219 Vortex Industries,Inc 1,422.00 Door Repair
28220 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.415.84 Lab Supplies
26221 Waters Corporation 149.68 Lab Supplies
26222 Western States Chemical,Ina. 283.13 Caustic Soda MO a-23-95
26223 Xerox Corporation 2,790.71 Copier Leases
26224 Blake Anderson 199.00 Meelingrfraining Expense Reimb.
26225 Layne T.Baroldi 756.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26226 Danny L.Dillon 498.47 Meelingrimining Expense Reimb.
26227 Michael D.Moore 863.75 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb.
26228 Addana Renescu&Gateway,Inc. 2,939.22 Employee Computer Loan Program
26229 Jerry F.Evangelista 2,650.05 Employee Computer Loan Program
26230 Orange County Sanitation District 22,117.68 Workers Comp.Reimb.
26231 Orange County Sanitation District 29.83 Petty Cash Reimb.
26232 CSMFO 140.00 Seminar Registration
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.036.970.81
Payroll Disbursements
18412-18554 Employee Paychecks $ 166.726.62 Biweekly Payroll 31=0
18555-18555 Employee Paycheck 2,078.78 Termination
46969-47417 Direct Deposit Statements 687,794.84 Biweekly Payroll 3/8/00.
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 836,60D.24
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148,301.49 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 128,819.11 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificata of Participation
State Street Bank&Trust Co.of Ca. 105,801.31 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 44,295.25 1211199-22MO Ouarterly Liquidity Fee on Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 427.217.16
Total Claims Paid 3/1/00-3/16/00 $ 5.300.788.21
Page 7 of 7
Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
26233 Orange County Sanitation District $ 401,047.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
26234 Southern California Edison 45,919.54 Power
26235 Aidoo Systems, Inc. 24,733.00 Professional Services-Network Labeling 8 Documentation
26236 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing 19.95 Publication
26237 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,600.09 Training Materials
26238 ABB Instrumentation 495.40 Instrument Supplies
26239 APEX Communications 10.458.33 Security Equipment
28240 ASTD 150.00 Membership
26241 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.43 Telephone Service
26242 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
28243 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
26244 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1,594.70 Rope
26245 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 4,289.51 Security System Electrical Supplies
26246 City of Buena Park 638.37 Water Line Damage Reimb.
26247 Clemson University 4,425.00 Training Registration
26248 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 14.54 Office Supplies
26249 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
26250 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 889.57 Electrical Supplies
26251 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 406.0& Plumbing Supplies
26252 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,148.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training
tD 26253 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,718.18 Electrical Supplies
26254 CSUS Foundation, Inc. 21.45 Publication
26255 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
26256 Fluid Dynamics 1,092.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental
26257 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment
26258 G.F.O.A. 590.00 Registration
26259 Voided Check - -
26260 GTE California 946.45 Telephone Services
26261 Getinge Castle 332.79 Lab Supplies
26262 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359.45 Dues Deduction
26263 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 9,9W.32 Safety Supplies
26264 J.D.Edwards So.Calif. Users Group 300.00 Membership
26265 Johnstone Supply 199.85 Electrical Supplies
26266 Law/Crandall 2,694.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182
26267 McGraw-Hill,Inc. 144.24 Publication
26268 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 605.41 Tools
26269 Mesa Consolidated Water Dist. 764.00 Hydrant Meter Deposit
26270 Mobile Mini, Inc. 183.61 Storage Bins Rental
26271 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 169.00 Training Registration
26272 Office Depot Business Services Div. 138.35 Office Supplies
26273 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment
Page 1 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3/31100 a
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26274 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
26275 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction
26276 Pacific Bell 1,131.24 Telephone Services
28277 Pacific Industrial Supply 30.71 Fum0ure
26278 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
26279 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
26280 Peace O01cers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction
26281 Pinnacle One 16,866.00 Mediation Service 11-17-1 8 5.37-3
26282 Port Supply 17.78 Rope
26283 QuadetOvonin 193.40 Office Equipment Repair
26284 Rain for Rent 3,132.97 Plumbing Supplies
26265 R.A. Reed Electric 6.369.41 Motor Overhaul
26286 Saddle Island Institute 8.075.00 Training Registration-Analyzing Construction Schedules
26287 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 1.317.14 Mechanical Supplies
26288 Sceptre Advanced Business Solutions 4,126.00 Software Maint.
26289 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 447.78 Specialty Gases
26290 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,174.88 Tools
26291 So.California SLA Users Association 75.00 Membership
26292 State of California 133.04 Wage Garnishment
26293 Stephen Weisberg 811.45 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue
28294 Summit Steel 346.48 Metal
26295 Super Power Products 334.03 Janitorial Supplies
26206 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,439.68 Mechanical Supplies
26297 The Unisource Corporation 7,074.56 Office Supplies
26296 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions
26299 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 3.134.56 Engineering Service-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase II
26300 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 12.288.00 Consulting Service-Parametric Emissions Monitoring Program
26301 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.418.82 Lob Supplies
26302 Wdeg Scientific 404.08 Lab Supplies
26303 Blake Anderson 686.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26304 Robert S.Dumity 734.08 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimb.
28305 Peter M.Morrison 222.81 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimb.
26306 Hai Nguyen 835.80 Meefing/rmining Expense Reimb.
26307 Charles F.Wnsor 249.28 Meeling?raming Expense Reimb.
26308 Carollo Engineers 44,040.04 Engineering Service J-254
26309 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 43,685.88 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process
26310 Cytec Industries 28,411.05 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18
26311 Delta Dental 41,674.68 Dental Insurance Plan
28312 Holmes 8 Narver, Inc. 31,149.19 Engineering Services 241
26313 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 114,577.58 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95
28314 Rellester 27.522.29 Employee Medical Health Premium
28315 Tran Consulting Engineers 38,469.00 Consulting Service 546
Page 2 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26316 Tran Consulting Engineers 27,850.00 Consulting Service Pl-65
26317 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 97,625.03 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95
26318 V&A Consulting Engineers 34.390.86 Engineering Service-Evaluating Sulfide Removal
26319 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 204,31425 Generator Repair J-33-1
26320 Vulcan 46,396.22 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
26321 Barnard Construction Company,Inc. 227,160.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11 R
26322 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 121,611.70 Construction M8-1
26323 Ken Thompson, Inc. 89,088.13 Construction 11-17-3
26324 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 241,555.38 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
26325 NCCI Enterprises,Inc. 26.594.65 Engineering Services 240
26326 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 281.931.80 Construction 7-7-1
26327 Union Bank of California 25,240.00 Construction 3-35R
26328 A-Plus Systems 3,050.45 Notices&Ads
26329 AccuStandard,Inc. 739.01 Lab Supplies
26330 Action Instruments 1.285.65 Electrical Supplies
26331 Great American Printing Co. 552.10 Office Supplies
26332 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 6,000.23 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems
26333 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 538.75 Registration
26334 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co., Inc. 2,DD2.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
-26335 Air Uquide America Corp. 664.43 Specialty Gasses
26336 Air Products&Chemicals 317.69 Lab Supplies
26337 Airborne Express 132.86 Air Freight
26338 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 1.057.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
26339 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 104.09 Mechanical Supplies
26340 Altemative Dispute Resolution Design Group 4,400.00 Human Resources Service
26341 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
26342 Appleone Employment Service 10,443.47 Temporary Employment Services
26343 Applied Industrial Technology 53.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies
26344 Arms Data Security 106.80 Oesite Back-Up Tape Storage
26345 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 2,099.00 Vacuum Truck Services
26346 Artistic Blinds 486.66 Office Supplies
26347 Ares Disposal Service, Inc. 926.72 Waste Removal
20348 Atlantis Pool Care 300.00 Service Agreement
26349 American Air Filter International 1,391.99 Filler
26350 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 999.59 Ceiling Tile
26351 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 40129 Telephone Service
26352 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 191.51 Telephone Service
26353 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2.416.76 Long Distance Telephone Service
26354 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
26355 Bailey, Fisher&Porter 354.95 Instrument Maint.
26355 Barton Instruments,L.L.C. 2,173.56 Instrument Supplies
26357 Battery Specialties 522.89 Batteries
Page 3 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26442 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use
26443 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
26W Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,139.42 Safety Supplies
26445 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 5,242.30 Instrument Supplies
26446 J.D.Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration -
26447 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation
26448 Jays Catering 32.33 Catering Services
26449 Jobtrak 95.00 Notices&Ads
26450 Johnson Power Ltd. 832.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
26451 Johnstone Supply 112.67 Electrical Supplies
26452 Kabbara Engineering 3,545.66 Professional Services-TraMic Control
26453 Kaman Industrial Technologies 572.16 Mechanical Supplies
26454 Karen Monaco&Associates 11,937.50 FIS Support Services
26455 Kensington Electronics 760.18 Electrical Supplies
26456 Knox Industrial Supplies 4,136.91 Tools
26457 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 2,197.55 Safety Supplies
26458 Lab Support 3.534.00 Temporary Employment Services
26459 La Molts Chemical Products 1,091.38 Chemicals
26460 Lee&Ro, Inc. 2,602.47 Engineering Consulting Services J-46
26461 Lexis-Nexis 112.99 Books B Publications
26462 Gerald R.Jones 8,853.73 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99
26463 Liquid Handling Systems 3.889.78 Pumping Supplies
26464 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 897.80 Professional Services-Corrosion
26465 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,794.08 Tools
26466 Measurement Variables, Inc. 1,070.20 Air Dryer
26467 Medlin Controls Co. 2,867.95 Instrument Supplies
26468 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch Site Study
26469 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 605.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
26470 Mission Uniform Service 3,314.26 Uniform Rentals
26471 Montgomery Watson 2,445.30 Professional Service-Emission Modeling
26472 Management Action Programs,Inc. 4,400.00 Training Registration
26473 MCR Technologies, Inc. - 720.21 Instrument Supplies
26474 National Institue of Business Mgnt. 48.00 Construction 11-17.3
26475 National Microcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
26478 National Plant Services,Inc. 2.332.50 Vacuum Truck Services
26477 Neal Supply Co. 626.35 Plumbing Supplies
26478 Newark Electronics 666.24 Instrument Supplies
26479 Nicholas Natty 4,800.00 Legal Service-INS Processing
26480 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 14,587.07 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
26481 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 732.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
28482 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service
26483 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,874.94 Office Supplies
Page 6 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131/00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
2e484 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 793.13 Electrical Pans&Supplies
26485 Orange County Water District 4,D88.66 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
26486 Orange Valve&Filling Company 1,193.88 Fittings
26487 Oxygen Service Company 361.98 Specialty Gases
26488 OCB Reprographics 11.885.12 Printing Service-Spec P-173
26489 OCE-USA, Inc. 375.44 Computer Equipment Maint.
26490 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 651.11 Electrical Supplies
20491 Pacific Bell 30.60 Telephone Services
26492 Padfic Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
26493 Pacific Mechanical Supply 145.10 Plumbing Supplies
26494 Padre Janitorial Supplies 289.76 Janitorial Supplies
26495 Parker Supply Company 8.394.00 Electrical Supplies
26498 Parkhouse Tire Co. 176.93 Time
26497 Pans Unlimited 142.85 Truck Supplies
26498 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 808.40 Lab Supplies
26499 Philip J.W.Roberts,PHO, PE 1.997.50 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue
26600 Pickens Fuel Corp. 495.14 Professional Service-CNG Program
26501 Polydyne, Inc. 23.394.29 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
26502 Ponton Industries 2,337.02 Instrument Supplies
26503 Power Design 3,356.41 Electrical Supplies
26504 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 80.23 Electrical Supplies
26505 Power Lift Corporation 3,750.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training
26506 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental
26507 Presentation Products,Inc. 329.17 Office Supplies
26508 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp. Claims Admin.
26509 Process Software Corp. 2.264.87 Software Maint.
26510 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 9,027.69 Sewer Cleaning-Revenue Area 7
26511 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,102.05 Mechanical Supplies
26512 DOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service
20513 R. L.Abbott 8 Associates 12.000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services
26514 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal
26515 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,386.28 Life Insurance Premium
26516 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1.776.86 Office Supplies
26517 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 13.95 Training Supplies
26518 RPM Electric Motors 647.04 Electric Motor Repair
26519 S.S. Mechanical Corp 19,578.00 Construction Pl-36-2
26520 Safety-Kleen 225.47 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste
26521 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2,724.53 4 Motors
26522 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 435.85 Mechanical Supplies
25523 Schwing America,Inc. 76.80 Pump Supplies
26524 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 19,562.34 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
26525 Scientific Refrigeration 3,245.16 Refrigerator Repair
Page 7 of 9
Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3/31100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26526 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,284.37 Specialty Gases
26527 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 2,432.30 Lab Equipment Repair&Supplies
26528 Sears Industrial Sales 375.20 Mechanical Supplies
26529 Seaventures 4,650.D0 Ocean Monitoring Vessel
26530 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 4.927.50 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
26531 Second-Sun 457.70 Light Fixtures
26532 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 103.44 Tools
26533 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,912.53 Tools/Hardware
26534 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Service-Santa Ana River Watershed Group
26535 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration
26536 Soco-Lynch Corp. 1,766.75 Janitorial Supplies
26537 SoflChoice 444.62 Software
26538 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 417.88 Emission Fees
26539 South Coast Environmental Co. 6,447.00 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service
26640 Southern California Edison 66.33 Power
26541 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 631.25 Janitorial Supplies
26542 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 5D0.00 COP Trustee Services
26543 Statoil Energy,Inc. 160.00 Registration
26544 Stewarrs De-Rooting&Plumbing 660.00 Plumbing Service
26545 Strata International,Inc. 926.98 Chemicals
26546 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint.
26647 Sunset Industrial Parts 280.39 Mechanical Supplies
26548 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 235.19 Electric Cart Parts
26549 Tekmar-Dohmian 182.37 Lab Supplies
26550 The Mertiwood Corporation 3,149.64 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection
26551 Forma Scientific Division 1,782.59 Lab Supplies
26552 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 539.59 Mechanical Supplies
26553 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance
26554 Time Warner Communications 42.49 Cable Services
26555 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 465.59 Locks&Keys
26556 The Trans Company 685.89 Electrical Supplies
26567 Transcat - 862.38 Electrical Supplies
26558 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc 2.550.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
26559 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 323.97 Truck Supplies
26560 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 170.00 Lab Services
26561 Teksystems 3,567.80 Temporary Employment Services
26582 Ultra Scientific 376.03 Lab Supplies
26563 United Parcel Service 680.35 Parcel Services
26564 University of Washington 70.00 Registration
26565 USFilter Westates 1,414.41 Instrument Supplies
26566 Valley Cities Supply Company 27.03 Plumbing Supplies
26567 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 17,508.00 Consulting Services-Ocean&Emissions Monitoring Computer Programming
Page B of 9
Claims Paid From 3/16100 to 3131100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26588 Vapex, Inc. 8,500.86 Pump Supplies
26569 Veme's Plumbing 15.684.97 Plumbing Equipment Repair
26570 Vertex, Inc. 943.89 Software Maint.
26571 Village Nurseries 76.42 Landscaping Supplies
26572 VCI Mechanical 275.00 Fuel Tank Certification Service
26573 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 9,135.72 Lab Supplies
26574 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,069.09 Security Guards
26575 Western States Chemical, Inc. 18.331.66 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
26576 Westem Switches 8 Controls, Inc. 67.77 Electrical Supplies
26577 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 1,958.51 Instrument Maird.
26578 Xemx Corporation 14,382.27 Copier Leases
26579 Union Bank of California 13,501.30 Construction 3-38-1
26680 Union Bank of California 11,136.02 Construction 11-17-3
26581 Thomas M.Flanagan 118.44 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimb.
26582 Chuck M. Forman 1,122.29 Meelingrrraining Expense Reimb.
26583 Charles G.Lee 210.85 Meeting?mining Expense Reimb.
26584 James D. Niswonger 127.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26585 John W. Swindler W7.64 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb.
26586 Frankle J.Woodside 633.64 Meetingrimining Expense Reimb.
26587 Moyasar T.Yell 977.85 Meelingfrmining Expense Reimb.
26588 Tyler T. Hoang 2,031.57 Employee Computer Loan Program
26589 Frank A. Leong 2,016.07 Employee Computer Loan Program
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3.086.612.83
Payroll Disbursements
18556-18674 Employee Paychecks $ 159.034.04 Biweekly Payroll 322/00
18675- 18677 Employee Paycheck 22,723.66 Termination
47418-47862 Direct Deposit Statements 677,639.47 Biweekly Payroll 322100
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 869.397.17
Total Claims Paid 3/16/00-3/31100 $ 3,946,010.00
Page 9 of 9 -
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To6tl.ofDir.
5/24/00
AGENDA REPORT nem NUMW 1em IpMW
Orange County Sanitation District 7
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CECIA FINDINGS
N/A
"m aizumaoubENNrrREstlrn.oaaoc
x—a sno9e Page 1
ATTACHMENTS
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 4/1100 — 4/15/00 & 4/16/00 —4/30/00. .
BA
A%v W n�LhW WFILESYbmap d
^� vxise Page 2
i AGENDA REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM
As soon as the review of the Agenda Report is complete, call the contact person for
pickup.
Subject of Agenda Report: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts
Contact: Name: Bill Aldridge Telephone Ext.: 7562
REVISION DATE
TO S REVIEWED COMMENTS
REQUIRED
5 8 Gib
ivision an g
J 8 �
e
General Manager
Hdp.meYSAIIQabtlpNW9f6EStl®nWLLOx
Page 3
Claims Paid From 4H/9D to 4111if00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
26590 Orange County Sanitation District $ 425,279.14 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
26591 Southern California Edison 61,232.76 Power
26592 American Airlines 13,203.82 Travel Services
26593 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.44 Telephone Service
26594 AT&T Wireless Services 3.855.20 Cellular Telephone Service
28695 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
26596 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
26597 Carollo Engineers 13,979.31 Professional Services-Kem County Biosolids Ordinance
26598 Coastal Conservancy 18.00 Publication
26599 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
26600 CASA 200.00 Conference Registration
26601 Environmental Law Institute 42.95 Publication
26602 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment
26603 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Gamishment
26604 GTE California 40.51 Telephone Services
26605 Industrial Metal Supply 794.49 Metal
26606 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction
26607 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 547.63 Safety Supplies
26608 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 2,550.00 Training Registration
26609 Lumi's 80.00 Meeting Expense
2661D McMaster-Can Supply Co. 790.65 Tools
26611 Motion Industries 228.79 Pump Supplies
26612 Orange County Family Support 498.60 Wage Garnishment
26613 Orange County Forum 35.00 Meeting Expenses
26614 Orange County Marshal 586.48 Wage Garnishment
26615 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction
26616 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
26617 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
26618 Peace Officers Council of CA 792.00 Dues Deduction
26619 Postmaster 550.00 Post Office Box Rental
26620 State of California 393.28 Wage Gamishment
26821 Summit Steel 185.32 Metal
26622 The Unisource Corporation 590.87 Office Supplies
26623 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions
26624 Norbert Gala 878.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26625 Charles F.Wrisor 910.52 Meeting Expense Reimb.
26626 Carrillo Engineers 82.144.53 Engineering Services-J-254
26627 City of Buena Park 58,758.50 Cooperative Projects Program Reimb.J-73
26628 Computerized Facility Integration 156,642.58 Engineering Service J-25-1
26629 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 31,923.09 (1)Dell Poweredge 6300 Server
26630 Robert F.Driver Associates 26,051.00 Boiler&Machinery&Crime Insurance
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 411100 to 4111
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26631 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 45,671.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98
26632 DukeSolutions, Inc. 161,826.48 Natural Gas-Spec#170
26633 K.S.Dunbar&Associates 29,000.00 Engineering Services 2-41
26634 Kemlmn Pacific, Inc. 93,930.60 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
26635 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 55,732.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99
26636 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 168,696.24 Engineering Services J42
26637 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 71.816.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
26638 Polydyne, Inc. 26.667.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92
26639 Projeds Partners 83,387.78 Temporary Employment Services
26640 Statoil Energy, Inc. 151,962.70 Can Gen Engines Overhaul&Mechanical Supplies
26641 Textile Engineering Associates 31,045.08 Belt Press Supplies
26642 Tule Ranch/Magan Fanns 68.206.24 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
26643 The Yakima Company 38.647.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
26644 Ark Construction Company 79.999.92 Construction J-55
26645 Brandall Modular Corp 91,894.14 Construction J-75
26646 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,163,556.00 Construction P2-39
26647 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 98,671.00 Construction P2-61
26648 S.S.Mechanical Corp 228,621.76 Construction P-46-2&J-53
26649 Southern Contracting Company 148,684.00 Construction P247-1 &J-33-1
26650 Union Bank of California 25,402A2 Construction PI46-2
26651 Orange County Sanitation District 41,362.39 Workers Comp. Reimb.
26652 A-1 All American Roofing 875.00 Roof Drains Repair
26653 Great American Printing Co. 297.17 Office Supplies
26654 Advanced Drainage System 200.00 Drain Pipe
26655 Air Products&Chemicals 23,445.13 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89
26656 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 244.28 Mechanical Supplies
26657 Altemative Dispute Resolution Design Group 2,800.00 Human Resources Service
26658 American Express 9,968.48 Purchasing Card Program
26659 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,600.D9 Training Materials
26660 Appleone Employment Service 4.495.06 Temporary Employment Services
26661 Artistic Blinds 640.80 Office Supplies
26662 Asbury Environmental Services 265.00 Waste Oil Removal
26663 Audio VkJw Reporting Services 38.00 Audio Video Services
26664 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. 121.11 Auto Shop Supplies
26665 Awards&Trophies By Bea 43.37 Plaques
26666 AKM Consulting Engineers 12,693.21 Consulting Services 11-17-3
26667 AMSA 625.OD Meeting Registration
26668 APEX Communications 12,355.07 Computer Security Equipment&Maint.
26669 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 50.90 Telephone Service
26670 AT&T Wireless Services 467.30 Cellular Telephone Service
26671 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program
26672 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 71.91 Valve Supplies
Page 2 of 7 E
G �
Claims Paid From 4/1100 to 4116100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26673 Blaze Out 401.55 Hydrostatic Testing
26674 Boyle Engineering Corporation 3,398.39 Engineering Services 3.38.1
26675 Brian Villigan 150.00 Claim Settlement-Vehicle
26676 Brilhinee Electric 882.78 Electrical Supplies
26677 California Automatic Gate 450.85 Service Agreement
26676 Calttomia Relocation Services, Inc. 303.75 Office Moving Services
26679 Calhol,Inc. 608.69 Electrical Pans&Supplies
26680 Cad R.Nelson, P.E. 940.00 Engineering Consultant 2-41
26681 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 3.925.00 Engineering Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension
26682 Charles Industries 1,405.33 Electrical Supplies
26683 Charles P.Crowley Co. 71.96 Instrument Parts
26684 ClarkLift of California.lnc. 895.00 Training Registration
26685 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 16.74 Office Supplies
26686 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 87.53 Electrical Supplies
26687 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 242.D6 Plumbing Supplies
26688 Cooper Energy Services 9,245.74 Engine Supplies
26689 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing
26690 Corporate Express 1,304.18 Office Supplies
26691 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12,335.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.989M9
26692 Cost Containment Solutions 956.80 Workers Comp.Services
26693 Coslco Wholesale Membership 35.00 Membership
26694 County of Orange 157.50 Permit Fees
26695 County Wholesale Electric Co. 240.06 Electrical Supplies
26696 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service
26697 CASA 800.00 Conference Registration
26698 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Conference Registration
26699 David's Tree Service 475.00 Tree Malnt.Service
26700 Diamond H Recognition 19.25 Employee Service Awards
26701 DOB Engineering,Inc. 7,072.00 Temporary Employment Services
26702 DGA Consultants,Inc. 720.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
26703 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,330.D0 Medical Screening
26704 Enchanter, Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
26705 Environmental Resources Associates 1,421.40 Lab Supplies
267D6 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1,068.73 Software
26707 ESRI,Inc. 800.00 Training Registration
26708 FedEx Corporation 157.94 Air Freight
26709 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 151.84 Lab Supplies
26710 Fountain Valley Camera 97.23 Photo Supplies
26711 Franklin Covey 57.75 Office Supplies
26712 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 203.54 Paint Supplies
26713 Fry's Electronics 303.66 Computer Supplies
26714 FLW, Inc. 289.41 Electrical Supplies
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 411100 to 4115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
28715 FM International, Inc. 10,191.42 Professional Services J-25-1
26716 Gates Fiberglass Installers 2.305.85 Fiberglass Repair
26717 GTE California 3.175.35 Telephone Services
26718 George Yardley Co. 795.38 Lab Supplies
26719 WVV Grainger, Inc. 441.46 Compressor Supplies
26720 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 99.13 Janitorial Supplies
26721 Harbour Engineering Group 13.700.81 Mechanical Supplies
26722 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 877.70 Plumbing Supplies
26723 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 6 Deli 409.54 Catering Services
26724 HIM, Inc. 530.13 Tools
26725 Home Depot 422.23 Small Hardware
26726 Hopkins Technical Products 1,613.46 Pump Supplies
26727 Hunts'Final Phase 1,783.78 Construction Services-Admin. Bldg.Acoustic Modgn.
26728 I.D.Industries, Inc. 207.47 Electrical Supplies
26729 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 15.155.00 Records Management Program
26730 Imaging Plus,Inc. 3.871.40 Printing Service
28731 Industrial Metal Supply 790.21 Metal
28732 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 303.04 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies
26733 Irvine Photo Graphics 20.11 Photographic Services
26734 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS1400 Upgrade
26735 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 125.54 Safety Supplies
28736 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 303.07 Instrument Supplies
26737 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 17,181.25 Construction Services-Gas Line Replacement
28738 Jays Catering 1,525.90 Catering Services
28739 Johnstone Supply 366.29 Electrical Supplies
26740 Kaman Industrial Technologies 220.90 Mechanical Supplies
26741 Kars Advance Materials, Inc. 3.857.50 Can Gen Engine No.2 Evaluation
26742 Keenan Supply 12.946.16 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
26743 Kelly Paper 899.43 Paper
28744 Knox 3,302.51 Tools
26745 Lab Support 930.00 Temporary Employment Services
26746 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 24,827.82 Engineering Consulting Services P2-39 8 P2-47-1
26747 Gerald R.Jones 4,492.87 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99
26748 Line-X Protective Coatings 612.38 Tmok Supplies
26749 Makesense Utility Bill Auditors 183.96 Utility Cost Saving Service
28760 MarVac Electronics 12.81 Instrument Supplies
26751 McMaster-Cam Supply Cm 417.14 Tools
26752 Michael's Stores, Inc. 49.13 Printing Supplies
26753 Mid Cities Honda 807.05 Portable Generator
26754 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 19,785.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies
26755 Mission Abrasive 8 Janitorial Supplies 165.05 Tools 6 Supplies
28756 Mission Uniform Service 3,650.68 Uniform Rentals
Page 4 of 7 c
Claims Paid From 411100 to 4/16100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26757 Mitchell Instrument Co. 415.00 Instruments
26758 Mobile Mini, Inc. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental
26759 Monster.Com 275.00 Notices 8 Ads
26760 Michael D.Moore 344.74 Meeting Expense Reimb.
26761 Nautical Software 4,507.00 Software
26762 Neal Supply Co. 228.61 Plumbing Supplies
26763 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,837.00 Training Registration
26764 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 8.076.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98
26765 North American Crane Bureau, Inc. 770.00 Equipment Training Course
26766 National Environmental Balancing Bureau 98.60 Publication
26767 NETSOL/Network Solution 3.980.00 Engineering Services-Security System Improvements
26768 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,580.46 Office Supplies
26769 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 2.278.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies
26770 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 174.37 Plumbing Supplies
26771 Oxygen Service Company 1,553.16 Specialty Gases
26772 OCE-USA, Inc. 279.00 Computer Equipment Maint.
26773 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 784.33 Electrical Supplies
26774 Pacific Mechanical Supply 146.71 Plumbing Supplies
26775 Patriot Video Productions 822.43 Video Taping Services
26776 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,700.41 Lab Supplies
26777 Pemia Pure,Inc. 206.67 Flfter
26778 Pinnacle One 16.698.50 Legal Service 11-17-1
26779 Ponton Industries 266.58 Instrument Supplies
26780 Power Eleclro Supply Co.,Inc. 28.73 Electrical Supplies
26781 Power Lift Corporation 1,250.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training
26782 Power Systems 9.245.07 Power Bldg.3 Generator Repair
26783 Praxalr,Inc. 221.21 Lab Supplies
26784 Primary Source 4.976.72 Office Furniture
26785 Process Software Corp. 380.00 Software Maint.
26786 Quanle ra Laboratories 1,000.00 Lab Services
26787 R. L.Abbott 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services
26788 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 50.00 Trash Removal
26789 Registrar,Air&Waste Management Assoc. 689.00 Meeting Registration
26790 Reliastar 9,485.63 Employee Medical Health Premium
26791 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 139.OD Registration
26792 Rosemount Analytical, Inc. 3,211.41 Instrument Supplies
26793 RPM Electric Motors 7,316.36 Electric Motor Repair
26794 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 3,650.00 Construction-Manhole Repair
26795 Scientific Refrigeration 350.00 Refrigerator Repair
26796 Scott Specially Gases, Inc. 529.20 Specialty Gases
26797 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 1,275.00 Lab Repairs
26798 City of Seal Beech 150.19 Water Use
Page 5 of
Claims Paid From 4/1100 to 4115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26799 Seoond-Sun 673.57 Light Fixtures
26800 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 70.D4 Tools/Hardware
26801 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer
26802 Supeloo,Inc. 498.31 Lab Supplies
26803 Skater,Inc. 2,882.26 Lab Supplies
26804 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration
26805 Skylights Unlimited 1,650.00 Skylights Replacement&Removal
26806 So.Cal.Gas Company 11.182.89 Natural Gas
26807 Soce-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Supplies
26808 SoftVew Computer Products 140.87 Computer Supplies
26809 SoftChoice 1.492.35 Software
26810 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1.929.10 Permit Fees
26811 Southern California Academy of Sciences 50.00 Registration
26812 Southern California Edison 7.768.61 Power
26813 Southern California Gas Company 1,812.60 Gas Dispenser Calibration
26814 Sparklefts 1,850.48 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
26815 Special Plastic Systems, Inc. 2,739.35 Accumulators
26816 Super Chem Corporation 340.76 Chemicals
26817 The Orange County Register 885.60 Notices&Ads
26818 ThermoQuest Corporation 23.57 Lab Supplies
26819 ThermoQuesl Institute 2,495.00 Training Registration
26820 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,183.02 Mechanical Supplies
26821 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1.331.10 Elevator Maintenance
26822 Daily Pilot 225.00 Notices&Ads
28823 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 4.31 Looks&Keys
26824 Toshiba International Corporation 1,802.78 Electrical Supplies
26825 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 157.38 Truck Supplies
26826 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 510.00 Lab Services
26827 Two Wheels One Planet 478.93 Bicycle Supplies
26828 Teksystems 1,197.80 Temporary Employment Services
26829 U.S. Filler Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement
26830 U.S.Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage
26831 United Asset Coverage, Inc. 24,820.00 Phone System Maint.
26832 United Parcel Service 87.20 Parcel Services
26833 Utilities Division,Nat'l Safety Council 175.00 Registration
26834 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,433.10 Plumbing Supplies
26835 Village Nurseries 48.49 Landscaping Supplies
26836 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.388.32 Vision Service Premium
26837 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,649.84 Lab Supplies
26838 The Wackenhut Corporation 3.075.78 Security Guards
26839 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 29.98 Electrical Supplies
26840 Western Business Systems 358.40 Office Supplies
Page 6 of 7 0
G
Claims Paid From 411/00 to 4115100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26841 Western States Chemical, Inc. 15,648.81 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
26842 Xerox Corporation 5,010.53 Copier Leases
26843 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 21324 Publication
26844 Mleden Gmavac Construction Co. 17,961.00 Construction 7-28
26845 Robert P.Ghirelli 541.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26846 LKevin Hadden 472.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb,
26847 Deborah L. Lindel 1.348.03 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26848 Donald F. McIntyre 1,171.06 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26849 Douglas M.Stewart 513.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
28850 Daniel R.Tremblay 1,286.96 MeetingRraining Expense Reimb.
26851 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 510.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
26852 Janice Debay 775.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
28853 Orange County Sanitation District 541.86 Petty Cash Reimb.
26854 Robert C.Thompson 1.815.38 Employee Computer Loan Program
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,303,771.56
Payroll Disbursements
18678- 18817 Employee Paychecks $ 157,923.86 Biweekly Payroll 4/5/00
18818- 18822 Employee Paychecks 12,003.43 Termination&Adjustment
47863-48307 Direct Deposit Statements 656,437.82 Biweekly Payroll 415/00
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 826.365.11
Wire Transfer Payments
Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148.532.50 March Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation
Chase Bank of Texas National Association 225,547.28 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation
State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 190,445.33 March Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 564.525.11
Total Claims Paid 411/00-4115100 S 5,694,661.78
Page 7 of 7
Claims Paid From 4116/00 to 4130100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
26855 Orange County Sanitation District $ 417,990.88 Payroll EFT Retrnbursement
26856 Woodruff,Spredlin 8 Smart 47,070.98 Legal Services MO 7-26.95
26857 Air Products 8 Chemicals 21,441,13 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 11-8-89
26858 American Society of Safety Engineers I 1.444.82 Training Registration 8 Supplies
26859 Voided Check - -
26860 AIHI 1,221.50 Training Supplies
26861 The Assoc.of Records Managers 8 Admin. 645.00 Registration
26862 American Telephone 6 Telegraph Corp. 48.91 Telephone Service
26863 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment
26864 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment
26865 Court Order 587.W Wage Garnishment
26866 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 190.57 Electrical Supplies
26867 CASA 200.00 Conference Registration
26868 Court Older 741.50 Wage Garnishment
26869 Franchise Tax Board 278.27 Wage Garnishment
26870 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment
26871 Fry's Electronics 16.15 Computer Supplies
26872 GTE California 1.261.13 Telephone Services
26873 Graseby S.T.I. 2.219.19 Engine Supplies
28874 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 118.65 Compressor Parts
26076 Information Resources 435.00 Human Resources Service
26876 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1,369.45 Dues Deduction
26877 Wine Ranch Water District 1.981.14 Water Use
26878 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease
26879 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade
26880 Line-X Protective Coatings 337.38 Truck Supplies
26881 Luccfs 55.00 Meeting Expense
26882 Matthew And Stewart Co.,Inc. 11,835.32 Construction 11-23
26883 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 130.71 Tools
28884 Millennium Associates 345.85 Training Supplies
26885 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
26886 National Fire Protection Association 878.59 Safety Supplies
26887 National Seminars Group 139.00 Training Registration
26888 Voided Check - -
26889 Office Depot Business Services Div. 27.35 Office Supplies
26890 Orange County Family Support 473.50 Wage Garnishment
26891 Orange County Marshal 622.12 Wage Garnishment
26892 OCEA 576.95 Dues Deduction
26893 Pacific Bell 30.68 Telephone Services
26894 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 800.00 Electrical Supplies
26895 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment
2689E Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
26897 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction
26898 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1.641.91 Tools/Hardware
Page 1 of 7
Claims Paid From 4/16100 to 4130100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26899 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 4,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group&Transfer$1,000
26900 So.Cal.Gas Company 12,563.67 Natural Gas
26901 State of California 46,43 Wage Garnishment
26902 State Board of Equalization 479.87 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee
26903 Summit Steel 744.51 Metal
26904 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies
26905 Superintendent of Documents 1Z00 Software
2690E Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,041.24 Mechanical Supplies
26907 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,509.29 Truck Supplies
26908 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions
26909 Layne T.Baroldi 253.22 Publication Reimb.
26910 Jeffrey L. Petersen 163A2 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
26911 WEF-Registration Dept. 565.00 Registration
26912 Alden,Systems,Inc. 56,480.00 Professional Services-Network Labeling&Documentation
26913 Commercial Resources Taz Group 250,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin.
26914 Computational Systems,Inc.(CSU 63.442.62 Video Data Collector Computer System
26915 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42.351.76 4 Dell Servers
26916 Delta Dental 41,178.64 Dental Insurance Plan
26917 Kemiron Pacific,Inc 73,673.00 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
26918 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 25,449.29 Lubricant/Diesal Fuel
26919 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 84,658.57 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
26920 Southern California Edison 45,883.54 Power
26921 Tute Ranch/Magan Farms 96,130.80 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
26922 Vulcan 127.104.18 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
26923 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 148,680.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R
26924 Fleming Engineering,Inc 464,965.30 Construction 3J8.1
26925 Ken Thompson, Inc. 588,676.88 Construction 11-17-3
26926 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 142,916.00 Consbuclion 2-34
26927 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 1,289,233.21 Construction PI-38S, P2-35-3,P2-46&P2.55
26928 Union Bank of California 64,171.20 Construction 11-17-3
26929 Union Bank of California 51.662.81 Construction 3-38-1
26930 West-Tech Contracting, Inc 44,280.00 Construction SP19990065
26931 Aceugte Fasteners 57.07 Tool Supplies
26932 Great American Printing Co. 199.69 Office Supplies
269W Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,389.32 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
26934 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies
28935 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 3,578.38 Manhole Frames&Covers
26936 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
26937 Appleone Employment Service 7,728.85 Temporary Employment Services
26938 Applied Industrial Technology 149.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies
26939 Arous Data Security 106.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage
26940 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 507.00 Vacuum Truck Services
26941 Asbury Environmental Services 120.00 Waste Oil Removal
26942 Awards It Trophies By Bea 335.48 Plaques
26943 Accent Awnings 85.00 Service Agreement
Page 2 of 7 0 ..
Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26944 ACGIH Woddvnde 984.00 Safety Publications
26945 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 3,600.00 Professional Services-Flow Monitoring Project
26946 American Industrial Hygiene Conference 1.300.00 Training Registration
26947 American Telephone 5 Telegraph Corp. 394.51 Telephone Service
26948 American Telephone 5 Telegraph Corp. 152.63 Telephone Service
26949 AWSI 33.00 Department ofTrensportation Training Program
26950 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 3,189.38 Telephone Equipment Service
26951 Battery Specialties 603.52 Batteries
26952 Boyle Engineering Corporation 6,193.88 Engineering Services 7-23-1
26953 Brady Corporation 325.21 Tools
26954 Brinderson Corp. 7,500.00 Fuel Management Maint.Service
26955 California Auto Refrigeration Dist.,Inc. 252.70 Service Agreement
26956 Caltrol,Inc. 387.90 Electrical Parts 5 Supplies
26957 Carollo Engineers 170.10 Professional Services-Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study
26958 Clayton Group Services,Ina 3,328.96 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene
26959 Coast Fire Equipment 1.402.14 Service Agreement
26960 Voided Chock - -
26961 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 8,800.0D Professional Services- Operational Response Procedures for Plants
26962 Consolidated Elect- Distributors, Inc. 6,878.07 Electrical Supplies
26963 Cooper Energy Services 4,410,23 Engine Supplies
26964 Corporate Express 455.02 Office Supplies
28965 Cost Containment Solutions 2.539.05 Worker's Comp.Services
26966 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,355.53 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies
26967 County Wholesale Electric Co. 9,730.57 Electrical Supplies
26968 Crane America Services,Ina 6.981.14 Crane Services
26969 Culligan of Orange County 95.70 Soft Water Service
26970 CRM Films 21&00 Training Video
26971 CWFA Membership 110.00 Membership
26972 CWEA-20DO California Bioeolids Training 77.00 Registration
26973 Del Met Analytical 1.326.00 Blosollds Analysis
26974 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1.211.18 Paint Supplies
26975 DOB Engineering, Ina 4,400.00 Temporary Employment Services
26976 DGA Consultants.Inc. 1,005.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94
26977 DMG-Maximus 3,800.00 Professional Services-Cost Allocation Plan
26978 E.G.Hollers Son,Inc. 68.24 Electrical Supplies
26979 Emergency Management Network, Inc 6,500.00 Training Registration
26980 Enchanter, Inc. 2.100.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
26981 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 1,880.16 Consulting Services-FIS Support
26982 Excel Visual Communications 459.76 Training Supplies
26983 Faxpress,Inc. 914.15 Office Supplies
26984 Filter Supply Company 443.73 Filters
26985 First American Real Estate Solutions 148.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription
26986 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 2,778A7 Lab Supplies
26987 Flo-Systems,Inc. 8,668.73 Pump Supplies
26988 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,982.02 Lap Term Disability Ins.Premium
Page 3 of 7
Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4/30100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
26989 Fountain Valley Camara 81.34 Photo Supplies
26990 Franklin Covey 130.63 Office Supplies
26991 Frys Electronics 389.84 Computer Supplies
26992 FOCUS 2000 Registration 945.00 Training Registration
26993 G.E.Supply 2,479.10 Electric Parts
26994 Genad-Callahan Company 150.85 Chemicals
26995 GTE California 3,308.22 Telephone Services
26998 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Supplies
26997 Goldenwest Window Service 1,844.D0 Window Cleaning Service
26998 WJJ Grainger,Inc. 492.23 Compressor Supplies
26998 GTE 6,449.50 Telephone Services
27000 Hanker Equipment Company 195.06 Truck Supplies
27001 Harper&Associates Engineering,Inc. 500.OD Electrical Supplies
27002 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 5,388.22 Engine Generator Control Supplies
27003 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 11,909.04 Engineering Service P1-44-4
27004 Home Appliance 428.85 Electrical Supplies
270D5 Home Depot 389.07 Small Hardware
27006 Horizon High Reach 7,696.01 Forklift Transmission Repair
27007 City of Huntington Beach 14,450.73 Water Use
27008 Hunts'Final Phase 7,626.00 Miw.Construction Services-Hwks"B"Enclosure
27009 HI Standard Automotive 1,686.12 Automotive Supplies
27010 Ictus Consulting,L.L.C. 11,160.00 Records Management Program
27011 Industrial Metal Supply 646.12 Metal
27012 Interstate Battery Systems 740.56 Batteries
27013 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.40 Water Use
27014 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade
27015 Airline Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 440.60 Safety Supplies
27016 J.O'Brien Company, Inc. 998.10 Computer Supplies
27017 J.P.Morgan Sewnties,Inc. 21,432.24 ' COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
27018 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3,190.40 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation&Manhole Repair
27019 K.P. Undstrom,Inc. 15,250.00 Environmental Committing Services MO 12-9-90
27020 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 24,987.96 Medical Insurance Premium
27021 Karen Monaca&Associates 6,062.50 FIS Support Services
27022 Kelly Paper 1.562.09 Paper
27023 Kerry Consulting Group 1,85728 Professional Services MO 11-15-95
27024 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,768.88 Tools
27025 Lee&Ro, Inc 14,539.54 Engineering Consulting Services J47
27026 Liebert Cassidy 2,092.60 Professional Service-Human Resources
27027 Mine Safety Appliances 1,744.90 Elecilml Supplies
27028 Maintenance Technology Corp. 81.19 Mechanical Supplies
27029 Mamw International 138.70 Janitorial Supplies
27030 Management Action Programs,Inc. 1,100.01) Training Registration
27031 Mail Chlor,Inc. 3,020.81 Electrical Supplies
27032 Me Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 1,140.11 Plumbing Supplies
27033 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,239.62 Tools
Page 4 of 7
Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130100
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
27034 Medlin Controls Co. 2.766.62 Instrument Supplies
27035 Microwave Specialties 142.00 Microwave Oven Supplies
27036 Mid-West Associates 24,802.14 Pump Supplies
27037 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 17.622.45 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
27038 Millimmics GO RMB Engineering 1,470.79 Electrical Supplies
27039 Mission Uniform Service 3,382.73 Uniform Rentals
27040 Moffatt&Nichol Engineers 270.03 Engineering Service 541-1
27041 National Institute of Bids&Technology 743.00 Lab Supplies
27042 National Meorocemp Services 1,258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation
27043 National Plant Services,Inc. 7,700.00 Vacuum Truck Services
27044 National Safety Council 716.40 Safety Supplies
27045 Neal Supply Co. 512.14 Plumbing Supplies
27046 Network Construction Services 1,148.90 Construction Services-Voice/Data Bldg Rewiring Project
27047 Network Generations, Inc. 2.337.40 Computer Supplies
27048 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,866.00 Training Registration
27049 City of Newport Beach 46.61 Water Use
27050 The Norco Companies 144.76 Mail Delivery Service
27051 North American Crane Bureau 1,485.00 Training Registration
27052 Office Of County Counsel,County of Kem 6.557.10 Legal Service-LACSDM 2 v. County of Kam
27063 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,020.03 Office Supplies
27054 Oxygen Service Company 2,880.10 Specialty Gases
27055 OCB Reprographics 3,495.30 Printing Service-Spec P-173
27056 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 49.78 Electrical Supplies
27057 Pacific Bell 1.108.14 Telephone Services
27058 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service
27059 Pacific Mechanical Supply 16.79 Plumbing Supplies
27060 Pacific Pads and Controls, Inc. 1,428.10 Electrical Supplies
27061 Pagenet 1,920.82 Paging Services
27062 Parker Supply Company 7.988.96 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
27063 Parts Unlimited 359.67 Truck Supplies
27064 Pickens Fuel Corp. 4,495.78 Professional Service-CNG Program
27065 Polydyne,Inc. 15,133.50 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
27065 Precise Sensor,Inc. 1,003.08 Can Gen Engine Supplies
27067 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admen.
27068 Process Equipment Company 1,397.55 Pump Supplies
27069 Pryor Resources, Inc. 2,900.00 Training Registration
27070 Pump Engineering&/or O Air 678.39 Compressor Supplies
27071 Ouanlems Environmental Services 1.378.00 Lab Analytical Service
27072 R&R Instrumentation.Inc. 883.91 Instrument Supplies
27073 Randolph Austin Co. 646.39 Plumbing Supplies
27074 Red Wing Shoes 164.64 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
27075 Reliestar 22.505.56 Employee Medical Health Premium
27076 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,309.46 Life Insurance Premium
27077 Robert's Auto Trim Shop 657.71 Auto Repair
27078 Rosemount Analytical,Inc. 1,361.81 Instrument Supplies
Page 5 of 7
Claims Paid From 4116100 to 4130I00
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
27079 Rosemount Measurement, Inc. 401.90 Instrument Supplies
27080 RJN Group,Inc. 5,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services
27081 RMS Engineering&Design,Ina 1,000.00 Engineering Services-Crane System Support
27082 RPM Electric Motors 1,039.87 Elecric Motor Repair
27083 Safety-Meen 11,805.50 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste
27084 Safetycare,Inc. 474.10 Safety Supplies
27085 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 6,450.00 Construction-Wet Well&Manhole Repair
27086 Santa Fe Indusrial Products,Inc. 661.35 Mechanical Supplies
27087 Schwing America,Inc. 7,953.32 Pump Supplies
27088 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 7,693.42 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
27089 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 5,807.86 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation
27090 Second-Sun 395.87 Light Fixtures
27091 Shamrock Supply Co.,Ina 83.25 Tools
27092 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,323.19 Tools/Hardware
27093 Supelce,Inc. 2,861.00 Lab Supplies
27094 SoftView Computer Products 127.55 Computer Supplies
27095 SoftChoice 1,030.78 Software
27096 Southern California Gas Company 750.00 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
27097 Sparkle8s 2,020.46 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
27098 Spex Cedprep,Inc. 451.20 Lab Supplies
27099 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 79.95 Pump Supplies
27100 Staloil Energy, Inc. 3,355.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
27101 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 205.25 Office Supplies
27102 Subscription Services,AOMD 215.54 Publication
27103 Summit Steel 498.49 Metal
27104 Sunset Ford 302.16 Vehicle Supplies
27105 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,348.68 Mechanical Supplies
27106 Super Chem Corporation 668.05 Chemicals
27107 Saft America 2,250.00 Batteries
27108 SKC-West, Inc. 860.08 Safety Supplies
27109 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 68.71 Electric Can Parts
27110 ThermoOuest Corporation 1,296.84 Lab Supplies
27111 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 450.00 Biosolids Analysis
27112 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 483.51 Mechanical Supplies
27113 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 20.24 Locks&Keys
27114 Traffic Control Service,Ina 25.64 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental
27116 Trident Data Systems 20,300.00 Computer Service&Supplies
27116 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 135.66 Truck Supplies
27117 Teksystems 1.097.00 Temporary Employment Services
27118 U.S.Filter Corporation 1.262.75 Service Agreement
27119 Ultra Scientific a20.50 Lab Supplies
27120 Undersea Graphics, Inc. 19,250.00 Contract Service-Outfall Inspection
27121 Union Bank of Califomla 1,414.32 Banking Services
27122 United Parcel Service 379.90 Parcel Services
27123 University of Southern California 6,500.00 Professional Service Reimb.-Huntington Beach Closure Investigation
Page 6 of 7 `
Claims Paid From 4/16/00 to 4130/00 F
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
27124 UC Riverside 5.000.00 Professional Service-Biotdckling Filter Teat
27125 V 8 A Consulting Engineers 4.235.66 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection
27126 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,134,58 Plumbing Supplies
27127 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5.120.00 Consulting Services-Parametric Emissions Monitoring System
27128 Veme's Plumbing I 1,030.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair
27129 VCI Mechanical 41.20 Office Supplies
27130 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8,360.00 Lab Supplies
27131 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,230.34 Security Guards
27132 Wayne Electric Co. 96.92 Electrical Supplies
27133 Western States Chemical,Inc. 7.805.83 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
27134 Weston Pringle 4,705.00 Professional Services-Kem County Traffic
27135 Wastrux International 49.05 Truck Supplies
27138 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc. 315.74 Electrical Equipment Repair
27137 Wordware Publishing,Inc. 64.90 Publication '
27138 Wyatt Data Services 299.00 Publication
27139 Xerox Corporation 2,596.75 Copier Leases
27140 The Yakima Company 15,082.63 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00
27141 201h Century Plastics, Inc. 98.07 Office Supplies
27142 Mladen Grbavac Construction Co. 20,402.00 Construction 7.28
27143 Union Bank of California 16,520.00 Construction 3-35R
27144 Liss Arosneguy 513.89 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb.
27145 Layne T. Baroldi 101.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb.
27146 Penick B.Carnahan 874.63 Masting/7raining Expense Reimb.
27147 Samuel L. Mowbrsy 512.35 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb.
27148 Simon L.Watson 516.92 MeetingRroining Expense Reimb.
27149 Michael J.McCusker 2,029.60 Employee Computer Loan Program
27150 Orange County Sanitation District 54.85 Petty Cash Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4.952.251.98
Payroll Disbursements
18a23-18943 Employee Paychecks $ 160,259.88 Biweekly Payroll 4/19/00
18944-18947 Employee Paychecks 2,613.24 Termination 8 Adjustments
48308.48746 Direct Deposit Statements W9,357.16 Biveekly Payroll 4119100
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 832,230.26
Total Claims Paid 4/16100-4130100 $ 5,794,492.22
Page 7 of 7
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dace I TOBA.Dr DIr.
05/24/00
AGENDA REPORT RemNumbe Iem (al
mur
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT RE MLADEN
BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V. ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract, filed by Mladen
Buntich Construction Company (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000005719)
in connection with Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No.
3-38-3, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District.
SUMMARY
Please see attached memo from General Counsel dated May 17, 2000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memo from General Counsel dated May 17, 2000.
\lntlanWblMq.ElalapenEalSoand IgeMa Redonda V BaN Agenda R@Wft NIwn t0(a).E¢
RMW. dM08
i
DRAFT
INUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETIN
Wednesday, April 26, 2000 '
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT:
Pat McGuigan, Chair pro tem and Chair, OMTS Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Committee Ryal Wheeler
Norm Eckenrode, Chair, PDC Committee
Tom Saltarelli, Chair, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT:
Jim Silva, County Supervisor Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Peer Swan, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
Pet McGuigan was appointed Chair pro tern because of the absence of Directors Debay and Swan.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the Regular March 22 and Adjourned April 3, 2000 meetings of the Steering were
approved as drafted. Director McGuigan abstained.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
Minutes of the Steering Committee K,..
Page 2
April 26, 2000
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the negotiations with the City of Brea on connection fee
waivers for Bexley Neighborhood properties currently on septic tanks. Director Daucher has now
suggested a compromise of a loan, or lien, against the property in the amount of$3,000. Staff will
prepare several alternatives for terms and conditions for the loans for presentation to the FAHR
Committee. Supervisor Silva asked that some type of interest be assessed. General Counsel Tom
Woodruff indicated that a loan program is allowed by the Special District Act. Mr. McIntyre will notify
Brea and the County that this will be presented to our Directors for consideration.
Agenda Item (9)A.will be removed from the agenda. Senator Polanco has pulled his bill from
consideration; however, he has committed to reintroduce the bill next session after the state-wide
EIR has been adopted.
Jim Herberg discussed the most recent meeting with the City of Huntington Beach and the State Fish
and Game Department regarding landscaping at Plant 2. A go-ahead was given to begin design with
an advisory committee formed to review it.
Mr. McIntyre indicated that an item would be added to the Board agenda, requesting approval of the
MOU with the County of Orange on urban runoff, which outlines the District's responsibilities and fair
share of costs.
(n REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson reported on the activities of the Little Hoover Commission, which is currently looking
at special districts' governance,public authority, reserves and revenues. A report is due this week
and staff will analyze the findings and report to the Directors. The Rebuild America program is also
working with public agencies, but is looking at the longer view of Infrastructure needs. One may
balance the other.
(8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff Indicated that the Court has denied a writ filed by an employee. He
updated the members on the activities regarding the Kern County biosolids lawsuit. The State's
office of Planning and Research has determined that Kern County shall be the lead agency for the
CEOA documentation related to Yakima's Class A biosolids processing facilities. However, he also
mentioned that Yakima has withdrawn its application for the facilities for a number of reasons.
Emilio Ariston, an employee who is challenging a problem solving decision, may address the Board.
Blake Anderson met with him, and Indicated that he is free to address the Board, but that there is no
administrative recourse at this point in the process.
(9) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-F)
A. Resolution in Support of Senate Bill 1956 (Polanco). This item was pulled from
the agenda.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
April 26, 2000
B. Urban Runoff/Coastal Remediation Action Plan. Robert Ghirelli reported that this
item is on the Board agenda. A request for an additional $160,000 of funding for
the District's share of Phase 2 studies has been received from Huntington Beach.
Staff is in the process of evaluating this request to verity the District's share.
The status of the diversion of urban runoff flows from Huntington Beach was
discussed. There are now nine pump stations diverting flow to the District. So far
our ocean discharge permit limits have not been exceeded by this practice. Staff
will continue to monitor the early affects of this practice.
Director Eckenrode expressed concern about making sure all of the affected
parties are involved in the discussions. At a presentation put on by the County,
there was no mention of the Sanitation District's role. Director Silva indicated that
he would be asking one County staffer to be assigned as lead for this program.
The first stage is to determine the source and the second stage will be a
cooperative program to remedy the problem.
Staff will present Its recommendations on the request for additional funding to the
OMTS and FAHR Committees.
C. Changes to Standard Agreement Form for Cooperative Projects Program, Job
No. J-73. Jim Herberg discussed proposed changes to the form of agreement for
these projects as a result of a letter request from the City of Huntington Beach for
verification that all of the District's funding is from local sources. The City may be
requesting matching funds from the federal government.
It was moved, seconded and approved to incorporate the following into the
Cooperative Projects Program agreements:
(1) Require the local agencies to reimburse the District for costs incurred by the
District, including costs for financial audits, resulting from local agency
participation in state and federal matching fund programs; and
(2) Require local agency project funding to match that of the District's,dollar-
for-dollar, regardless of state and federal grant or loan participation.
D. US Bureau of Reclamatlon/Southem California Recycling Projects Initiative. Jim
Herberg reported on the District's participation in this program. The Bureau is
seeking interested agencies as partners to share in the costs and by doing so
would allow the District membership on the Executive Management Team, which
is responsible for the overall direction of the program. Costs would depend on
the number of partners and should be known by June. Staff was directed to
forward the information to the GW RS Joint Coordinating Committee at its next
meeting and report back to the Steering Committee in May.
E. What has the EMT done since its January Retreat? Transition Plan
Blake Anderson, in an effort to make an orderly transition,described where the
EMT is,where it wants to be and how it plans to get there. He described the
steps taken to date, including the management training (conducted by a firm
called MAP)for all EMT members and division managers and the EMT retreat in
January. Management has been establishing expectations for the next budget,
a
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4
April 26, 2000
achieving alignment through the vision and mission statements for departments
and divisions, developing operating philosophies using the basic MAP tools for
setting goals. Staff is working on a five-year staffing plan, which will consider
each division as a separate business unit, developing goals and objectives and
staffing requirements to meet those goals. Macro issues that may impact all
departments are being developed so that they may be considered during the
development of the five-year staffing plan and work plans. An issues list that was
a result of the EMT Retreat will be considered by an Operational Organization
Committee in attempt to prioritize the items and fix those things that need fixing.
F. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in May .
The OMTS Committee agenda will include a tour of the lab and the PDC
Committee will meet at Plant 2 to tour several of the sites of future projects.
Several items listed for review by the OMTS Committee have been removed from
the agenda.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
Don McIntyre reported that representatives from Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch were at the
District last week for presentations prior to their determining a rating for our finance offerings.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May 24,2000 at 5 p.m.
The next Board Meeting is scheduled for May 24, 2000 at 7 p.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 5
April 26, 2000
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
S bmitted by,
V a
J a appan
ring Committee Secretary
N Iry OBIdMyISrEFRING COMMt2600$L NnufBtOx
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 5
April 26, 2000
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
S bmitted by;
Q
J a appan
Stebring Committee Secretary
NIq.ObNppgaISTEE/1/N000MNIITEEVpIM,WIOIMW SL NiwluWv'
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2000—5 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on May 3, 2000, in the Districts Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake P. Anderson, General Manager
James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services
Jan Debay, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance
Peter Green Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Joy Neugebauer Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Anna Piercy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Kenneth Blake Barbara Collins, Senior Analyst
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Directors Absent: Jim Colston, Regulatory Specialist
Richard Castillon, IT Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Mike White, Controller
Simon Watson, O&M Maintenance Manager
Others Present: Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance
Manager
Toby Weissert Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the April 5, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed.
Directors Jan Debay and Kenneth Blake abstained.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
May 3, 2000
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair gave no report
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson reported on the Little Hoover Commission's report that was released earlier that
day. The report discusses special districts within the state of California, citing excessive
reserves and inefficiencies. An executive summary of the report was distributed to the
Directors. Some of the generalized findings of the Commission's report, which deal with
observations of over 4000 special districts in California, are of concern to this District, even
though they don't apply to our policies and practices. Namely the invisibility of some special
districts to the public, policymakers lack the analytical tools to overcome the status quo, some
special districts having banked multi-million dollar reserves without supporting the practice with
a well thought-out policy, and property tax allocations to some districts distort the true cost of
services. Obviously, generalizations like these cannot be equally applied to every special
district, and in particular, ours. For this reason, staff will respond to the Commission's report in
the form of a white paper that will be provided to the Board at a future meefing.
Mr. Anderson stated the chairman of the Little Hoover Commission would be making a
presentation on this report at the CASA meeting, which is being held in Rancho Bemardo May 4
to May 6.
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, was recognized. She received a phone call
from the Orange County Registers correspondent in Sacramento. The reporter asked about
excessive reserves in Revenue Areas 2 and 3. The reporter had incorrect data stating each of
the revenue areas had in excess of$200 million in reserves each. One of the reporters
questions was why OCSD wasn't doing more to inform the public of the District's finances.
Michelle directed the reporter to the District's web site, which has the executive summary of this
years budget.
(7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
The Director of Information Technology had no report.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
The Director of Operations and Maintenance had no report
(9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, updated the Directors on the investigation of last
years beach closures in Huntington Beach. A series of tests began recently which will include
two dye studies. The city of Huntington Beach is the lead agency for this testing program, with
support from the County of Orange and OCSD. Approximately$500,000 will be spent on these
and other studies to improve our understanding about how the water moves through the
drainage channels into the ocean.
` Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
_ and Technical Services Committee
o Page 3
May 3, 2000
Mike Moore, Environmental Compliance &Monitoring Manager, gave a brief update on
biosolids issues. The potential purchase of the Yakima composting site in Kern County has
been cancelled. The Tule Ranch purchase in Kings County is still in escrow and should be
closed by the end of the month. Upon the close of escrow staff will be looking at some site
improvements at the front portion of the site to make this facility a showcase; the plans will be
brought back before the Directors for review.
Mr. Moore also reported that Senator Polance pulled SB 1956 because it was thought there
would not be sufficient votes to get the bill through the Senate Environment committee. This bill
limits the discretionary authority counties can exercise in establishing ordinance requirements
on biosolids that are more restrictive than state or federal requirements. Senator Polanco has
committed to the sponsors (City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sanitation District)that
the bill would be reintroduced after the November election.
(10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not in attendance.
(11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a- d)
a. OMTSOO-08: Award a sole source purchase order to Villa Ford of Orange for a 36-
month closed-end lease for three EV Ranger compact pickup trucks for a
total amount not to exceed $47,136.32 including all taxes and fees.
Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Manager, gave a brief
report on the lease of three electrical-powered vehicles.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
b. OMTSOO.09: Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for
Purchase of Storage Area Network, Specification No. E-277, in
connection with the Computerized Facility Atlas and Document
Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, to upgrade a portion of the District's
networking infrastructure, for a total amount not to exceed$281,643.85.
Rich Castillon, IT Manager, gave a brief report on the proposed upgrading
of the District's networking infrastructure.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
C. OMTSOO-10: Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment
for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per
gallon for all sales, maintenance costs of$900 per month, and$90 per
hour for emergency maintenance services, effective July 1, 2000 to June
30, 2001, in a form approved by General Counsel.
Mark Esquer gave a detailed report on the current agreement with
Pickens Fuel Corporation.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
4 Page 4
May 3, 2000
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
d. OMTSOO-11: 1)Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty
repair on eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a
total project budget cost not to exceed $150,000; and 2)Authorize staff to
award a sole source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services, Inc. for
warranty repair work to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total
amount not to exceed $150,000.
Simon Watson updated the Directors on the repair of central generation
engines.
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs
recommendation.
(12) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-c)
a. OMTSOO-12 Legislative Update
Jim Colston updated the Directors on current legislation affecting the
District.
b. OMTSOO-13 Tour of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory and Laboratory
Information Management System (LIMS)
Sam Mowbray gave a tour of the District's laboratory prior to the
commencement of the OMTS Committee Meeting.
C. OMTSOO-14 2000-2001 Budget Summaries
Gary Streed gave a brief overview of the 2000-20001 budget summaries.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF
ANY
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
Directors requested to receive a monthly update on the Huntington Beach investigations.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
{ Page 5
May 3, 2000
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
June 7, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
Submitted by:
Penny M. M e
Operations, aintena and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
H:\wp.dta\aBenda\OMTS\20WWinu w\05030o Minutes Eoc
OMTSCOMMITTEE Meenn90a[e TueG.orgr.
05103/7A00 05/34/00
AGENDA REPORT I"Numbc Rem Nu)mber
Orange County Sanitation District OMr500-09 13(
FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology
Originator: Richard Castillon, Manager
SUBJECT: E-277 PURCHASE DELL STORAGE AREA NETWORK
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Award a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation for Purchase of Storage
Area Network(Specification No. E-277) to upgrade a portion of the District's networking
infrastructure in connection with Computerized Facility Atlas and Document Management
Project, Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85
SUMMARY
The Information Technology(IT) Department has evaluated specific District needs for ongoing
server and storage requirements. New technology projects such as the Electronic Document
Management System (EDMS) and the Facilities Atlas require the purchase of several servers,
based on our current standard. The extremely high computing demands of these applications
require computing systems that are both flexible and expandable. As a result, IT has
determined that the Dell Computer Storage Area Network (SAN) is the best solution for the
District's growing needs.
This purchase will be the initial step to resolve disk management issues and is the beginning of
an agency-wide plan to re-invent our server architecture strategy. A shift in the use of
technology to address business needs is resulting in an exponential growth in data processing
and storage requirements. This shift in our business process results in a move from our current
multiple application server strategy to a data center strategy. The Dell SAN solution makes all
this possible and ensures that the systems we purchase today are not inadequate tomorrow.
Dell is the current OCSD standard for all desktop computers, laptop computers and servers, and
a member of the California Mutual Awards Schedule (CMAS) program. The CMAS program
establishes agreements with those manufacturers/suppliers that offer products and/or services
which are currently on an existing multiple award schedule with the Federal General Services
Administration (GSA) or other approved multiple award contract. Contractors, such as Dell,
offer products and/or services and prices from an already existing competitively assessed, cost
compared, multiple award contract. The CMAS program then adds California contract terms
and conditions, ordering procedures, and California procurement codes, policies and guidelines.
All items will be purchased through the CMAS program to take advantage of Dell's aggressively
priced solutions.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff recommends awarding a sole source purchase order to Dell Computer Corporation, for the
purchase of a Storage Area Network (Specification No. E-277) to upgrade a portion of the
District's networking infrastructure in connection with Computerized Facility Atlas and Document
Management Project, Job No. J-25-1, for a total amount not to exceed $281,643.85.
RM. Warn MN
n«r.s¢ w Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Various)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Dell SAN solution was selected for the following reasons:
♦ The Dell Server is the current OCSD standard
♦ Dell is part of the California Mutual Awards Agreement(CMAS) program with aggressively
priced solutions (CMAS# 3-99-00-0167C)
♦ Dell is a direct seller(no middle man)
♦ The SAN solution allows disk spare to be configured to individual server and system
requirements.
♦ Up to six servers can be backed up from a single source using the identical tape resources.
♦ According to the Gartner Group, Dell is one of only four Enterprise Tier 1 vendors (Major
corporations with proven resources and longevity to support major networks)
♦ Dell has a history of providing support, service, and longevity
♦ There are currently Dell SAN/Fiber Channel deployments at
♦ Orange County Sheriff Department(mission critical 911 system)
♦ Maricopa County
♦ Nevada Department of Transportation (GIS database)
• Dell offers a single source major Support Vendor in IBM Global Solutions with
• A guaranteed 4 hour response time
• Local spare parts stocking
• Dell offers manufacture's on-line remote support and troubleshooting
• Five year maintenance plans are available guaranteeing non-obsolescence
♦ Pre and Post sales configuration consulting is available free of charge
♦ This solution provides better management of rapidly changing data expansion requirements
and system resources usage
♦ The fiber channel solution allows a central data backup source that saves dramatically on
backup tapes and resource efforts
♦ The SAN solution addresses concerns for space constraints. Purchasing six conventional
servers would take the space of 3 full size server cabinets. There is no space available for a
conventional plan. The SAN solution takes 1-%cabinets and will use existing space.
ALTERNATIVES
Continue purchasing and managing multiple single servers for each project or as resource
needs change. Locate an additional computer room and peripherals to house additional
servers.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
FM UIDb 1074
R. waoao Page 2
OMTS COMMITTEE M22S6/na C TOB 'D".
05�03/OB BB/29/OB
AGENDA REPORT IDem Number Ihm Number
_ orals oB-lo 13 rm
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Originator: Barbara Collins, Senior Analyst
SUBJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, CONTRACT RENEWAL
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the
operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales,
maintenance costs of$900 per month, and $90 per hour for emergency maintenance
services, effective July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, in a form approved by General
Counsel.
SUMMARY
The District's CNG facilities were operational in April 1999. The CNG facilities consist
of two fueling islands, one compressor facility and appurtenances. The District
contracted with Pickens Fuel Corporation in January 1999 to perform maintenance as
well as to operate/administer the retail business on behalf of the District. (This work also
includes issuing of fuel cards, invoicing and collection.) The OMTS Committee
recommended, and the District Board of Directors approved, an extension of this
contract in November 1999 until June 30, 2000. Staff is proposing to continue the
relationship with Pickens and award a one-year contract.
The scope of services contained in this contract include scheduled preventive
maintenance, call out service for emergency maintenance (24 hour on-call), and
administration of the station as a retail outlet. In addition, the contract has provisions for
conducting repairs and major maintenance in accordance with a fee schedule. The
scope of work is the same as the previous agreement except emergency maintenance
has increased from $75 to $90 per hour.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Under the terms of the contract for the operation and maintenance of the station, the
payment fees for services provided are:
Service Cost
Monthly scheduled maintenance $900/ Month
Emergency call-out maintenance Labor $901 Hour
Ma'or maintenance and repairs As Needed
Administrative/0 rational fee $0.101 Gallon
Labor per hour based on fee schedule
M:MmdWw�Aq�R�M Agmda Rwub�tslm.aoc
emue Page 1
Pickens Fuel Corporation is currently the only provider of inclusive services to CNG
stations in the Southern California area. District staff is also talking with the Southern
California Gas Company in order to develop a second option for providing these
services.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Staff recommends hiring Pickens Fuel Corporation for one year under the terms of
service listed in the table above.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem:se)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The CNG station was built with two grants from the AOMD at a cost of approximately
$1.4 million.The public CNG station has been operational since April 1999. The station
received limited use until December 1999. In December 1999, the volume of fuel sold
increased to approximately 1,800 gallons, and proceeds offset the expenses for routine
maintenance of the station and OCSD received its first payment from Pickens. Since
December, sales have steadily increased.
The largest increase resulted when the John Wayne Airport awarded American Taxi an
exclusive contract for the airport facilities. American Taxi uses compressed natural gas
vehicles and is OCSD's largest customer. Sales following the change in contracts
escalated during March to 8,543 gallons. (See table below.)
Month Gallons Dispensed Total sales Operating Costs
December 1795 $1654.68 $2093.71
January 2,505 $2330.60 $2643.73
February 3,928 $3898.52 $3770.08
March 8 543 $9447.80 $7056.66
The proforma completed in November 1998 indicated that when average monthly sales
equaled 25,000 gallons in approximately six to seven years, the station would pay for
itself. The biosolids hauling trucks, behind schedule because of project delays, are
projected to begin fueling at OCSD in May. According to proforma analysis, sales
should double when this occurs. CNG usage from biosolids hauling trucks will increase
sales faster than the original proforma analysis projected.
M ww nasal.a.wd.vmo eo.ie ac..e.aewavfwan.m itm eon
R«tea ermAa Page 2
ALTERNATIVES
v
None
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
Chart — CNG Sales and Operating Costs
BAC:pjm
R.��M Home Rew+euawseem Ao a ReoemmaoRe.+xm.ae�
R. ermm Page 3
K r
� r
CNG Sales and Operating Costs
$25,000.00
$23,200
When sales equal $23,200, the station will recover capital costs. According to the original proforma,
$20,000.00 this will occur in six to seven years.
$15,000.00
Total Sales
$10,000.00 $9,447.80
10,
11,
/ $7,056.66
$5,000.00 $3,770.08 /
$2,643.73 / Total Operating Costs
$2,093.71 898.52
30.60
$1,654.68
December January February March
Note: Facility cost excludes depreciation of capital assets.
OMTS COMMITTEE MWing Date Tosd.ofar.
05/03/2000 05/29/00
AGENDA REPORT Item Number IMMNumber
orats0g-tt t3rl
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
Originator: Simon Watson, 0 & M Maintenance Manager
SUBJECT: CONNECTING ROD WARRANTY REPAIR ON THE CENTRAL
GENERATION ENGINES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Approve a budget amendment increase from $114,000 for the warranty repair on
eight Central Generation Engines over the next two years, for a total project budget
cost not to exceed $150,000; and
2) Authorize staff to award a sole source purchase order to Cooper Energy Services,
Inc. for warranty repair work to the eight Central Generation Engines, for a total
amount not to exceed $150,000.
SUMMARY
The District is faced with a decision on the long-term maintenance of the eight Center
Power Generation Engines. In 1997 the engine supplier notified the District that the
rods in the engines the same model used by the District were experiencing rod failures.
Cooper Energy Services, the engine supplier, recommended the District immediately
reduce the rod inspection frequency from every 1000 hours of engine runtime to 500
hours and for the long term either recondition or replace the fifty-eight engine rods.
District staff is confident that the delay has not put the engines at risk of failure.
In 1997 Cooper Energy Services sent the District a Warranty-Repair agreement
recommending a rod-reconditioning program. The Agreement was based on a pro-
rating of materials based on actual engine hours at time of repair. Staff negotiated a
cost for Cooper to remove rods, ship to the factory, recondition, return and install, plus
District labor oversight and a contingency to develop a budget cost of$114,000. El
Nino and a delay in the supplier schedule kept the project from starting until now.
Cooper proposed, and staff concurs, that the re-conditioning the engine rods is the
satisfactory and cost-effective long-term solution
District Maintenance staff recommend using either new or our own rods in the re-
conditioning program. In order to reduce the down time of the engines, District staff
recommends the purchase of the use of seven new rods and use of one District-owned
rod to start the project. Staff negotiated a reduced cost for the use of the seven new
rods based on the return of seven used rods at the end of the program. The total cost
of the use of seven new rods is $34,265. The rod purchase will allow Cooper to install
our own reconditioned rods or new rods back in all of the engines. Staff has negotiated
Page 1
the Cooper recondition program at a cost of $101,164.36 plus the use of seven new '
rods at $34,265 for a total of $135,428,36. Staff recommends a contingency including
District staff oversight of $14,570.64 for a total project cost not to exceed $150,000.00.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff recommends awarding a contract to Cooper Energy Services, for the warranty
repair work on eight Central Power Generation engines for $135,429.36 and a
contingency amount of$14,570.64 (District staff support and estimated engine hour
increase) for a total amount not to exceed $150,000.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The District operates and maintains central generation facilities at Plant No. 1 and Plant
No. 2. The primary role of the Central Generation plants is to satisfy the requirements
in the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit requirement for
the reliable supply of electricity for plant equipment. The Central Generation plants are
the primary source of electricity and thermal energy for the treatment plants, while
Southern California Edison provides the backup source of electricity. Certain mission-
critical equipment also has standby emergency power generation. The reliable
operation of the Central Generation plants is key to assuring smooth operation of the
process plants and to the prevention of sewage spills.
ALTERNATIVES
Purchase 58 new rods at an approximate cost of$290,000 plus labor.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Master Connecting Rod Reconditioning Proposal
Page 2
150 Lincoln Avenue
Groh Cny.PA 161'7.1898
Mlt Tel ya 58 8000
fax 412:58 3574
• Co .e
axO
COOPER Cobe. m
ope
ENERGY SERVICES Enterpmeexemen9
ot En.Tronia
Penn""
Sup 60i
July 25, 1997
Orange County Sanitation District
Power Plant Maintenance Supervisor
P.O. Box 8127, Plant k2 Located at Huntington Beach, CA
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
USA
Subject: Master Connecting Rod Reconditioning Proposal
Gentlemen:
The following information provides historical background and the reconditioning proposal terms
and conditions for the LSV-4-6A master connecting rod.
t• Background
Since 1989, there have been sixteen (16) incidents of cracked or broken master connecting rods in
Cooper-Bessemer® LSVB engines rated at 400 RPM. Five (5) of these failures resulted in
significant engine damage. All failed rods were manufactured since 1984 and were characterized
by a crack, originating in the main crank pin bore and propagating through the narrow section of the
rod between the crank pin bore and the articulated rod pin bore. Since early last year, an ultrasonic
inspection method has been used successfully to inspect connecting rods in-situ at 500-hour
intervals. Since the first failures, Cooper Energy Services (CES) has conducted extensive
investigations and analyses to identify the root cause of this problem and an appropriate corrective
action strategy. The following paragraphs provide a brief overview of the analyses and outline CES'
reconditioning offer to owners of LSVB engines shipped after January 1, 1985.
Over the course of the investigation, CES has employed several respected consultants, including
Battelle, Southwest Research Institute and Structural Reliability Technology. This group of experts
assisted CES' in-house design engineering, quality assurance, metallurgical, solid mechanics and
manufacturing engineering technical resources, along with the support of bearing manufacturers,
connecting rod forgers, customers and others. Until early 1996, restricted access to failed
connecting rods limited CES' ability to analyze the failures and determine root cause.
Page One of Five
Page 2 of 5
July 25, 1997
Extensive analysis and testing has determined that the and failures start from microcracks in the
main pin bore, eventually propagating through the thinnest section of rod. Microcracks have
typically developed after more than 7,500 hours of operation and propagate from an
undetectable size to critical size in the range of 500 to 700 hours. Material tests have
consistently showed that the rod material meets or exceeds design specifications. Finite
element stress analyses of the rod design showed that the bulk safety factor was greater than
4.0 under even the worst conceivable operating environment, confirming that the basic design
was sound. Logically then, the failures had to be caused by some other factor. A review of the
operating conditions at the failure sites could not confirm any unacceptable operating
conditions, even though nine (9) of the sixteen (16) failures occurred at one site. Some, but not
all, of the rods showed evidence of fretting, or adhesive wear, between the rod bore and the
bearing shell outer diameter. Attention then focused on the manufacturing process. Even
though the LSVB connecting rods are manufactured according to detailed engineering
specifications with processes that meet the most stringent quality standards, the investigations
revealed subtle differences in some of the connecting rods manufactured since 1984.
The manufacturing history of the LSVB rods was found to be an important factor in the failure
tendency. Prior to 1985, rods were manufactured in-house using a process of turning with
conventional tooling, followed by honing to establish accurate bore size and surface finish. In
1985, wear in the turning machines made it necessary to add a bore grinding operation before
honing to adequately control the bore size. Eventually, the rod machining was subcontracted to
an outside source. This source used newer CNC turning machines with high speed carbide
tooling, which were able to meet bore size and surface finish specifications without grinding or
honing operations. During the period that the rods were out-sourced, CES invested in similar
CNC machinery that essentially replicated the process used by the subcontractor. This
machinery continues in use at this time, although the finish honing process has been restored in
the past year. Also, for a period of time, shot peening was added as a final finishing step to
produce a residual compressive stress layer in the master rod bore.
Essentially, it has been determined that the honing process provided some beneficial
characteristics that were not well understood prior to completion of the recent investigations.
The high-speed carbide turning machinery, although very precise and accurate, has a tendency
to leave a very thin layer of residual tensile stress caused by local work hardening of the
surface. Honing after turning both removes the thin tensile layer and creates a thin compressive
residual stress layer. Of course, compressive stresses are beneficial to the prevention of crack
Initiation and propagation. Further, the honing process creates a crosshatched surface pattern
that aids in oil retention on the surface of the bore. It is believed that this oil retention helps
reduce the risk of adhesive wear, often referred to as fretting, between the rod bore and the
bearing shell outer diameter. In reviewing the surface finishes of the rod bore and the mating
bearing shell, the smoother rod bore surface finish after honing appears to be more compatible
with the shell surface, reducing the tendency for adhesive wear between the rod bore and the
shell. The short-lived attempt to use final shot peening as a protective measure was
unsuccessful because it created small Imperfections in the hardened as-tumed bore.
Statistically, some of these imperfections were located in areas that may have led to crack
Initiation in the critical area close to the thinnest section of the rod bore.
Page 3 of 5
July 25. 1997
An extensive review, with the assistance of the bearing shell supplier, has concluded that an
increase in bearing shell crush, or preload, would be beneficial. New bearing shells having
0.0055/0.0065" crush (current shells have 0.003/0.004") will provide increased contact pressure
with the back of the bearing shell. This will have a beneficial effect on adhesive wear.
:• Reconditioning Process
Based on Its extensive analyses, CES has determined that existing connecting rods can be
reworked to eliminate the risk of premature failure from the factors that are discussed above.
The reconditioning process requires removal of the master connecting rods from the engine.
Using special tooling, the rods can be removed from the engine without disturbing the top end of
the engine. Once outside the engine, the rods will be shipped to CES' Grove City, Pennsylvania
factory for a reconditioning procedure involving the following steps:
• The rod will be carefully inspected using non-destructive methods to verity surface
condition in the rod bore.
• The faces of the joint between the rod and rap will be milled to reduce the bore diameter
of the rod and cap assembly after it is bolted together again.
• The bore will be turned to a size that is approximately 0.002" smaller than the final
finished bore size.
• After turning, the bore will be carefully honed to final size, removing at least 0.002" from
the bore to remove any residual tensile stresses from the turning process.
• After honing, the rods will be nitrocarburized to increase surface hardness, strength and
adhesive wear resistance.
• As a final quality measure, the rods will be inspected to assure conformance to design
specifications.
• The rods will then be reinstalled in another engine; downtime will be reduced by
installing previously reconditioned rods that will be traded for the customer's original rods
from the engine.
:• Reconditioning Proposal
Cooper Energy Services offers the following:
• While the warranties on most of the connecting rods in service today have long since
expired, we realize that our customers have been subjected to considerable
inconvenience as a result of the rod inspection program. As an accommodation to our
customers, and to induce them to take the important safety step of obtaining
reconditioned rods, we are prepared to bear a significant portion of the cost of acquiring
and installing reconditioned rods. We want to establish a program that will treat all
customers equally and yet still take into account differences in their operating
experiences. To accomplish this, we will provide parts and labor at a cost to the
Page 4 of 5
July 25, 1997
customer that will be based on a calculated beneficial life of the engines. The customer
will be offered a fixed price package that includes reconditioning the connecting rods,
labor to remove/replace, plus all associated components, 1. e. new set of connecting rod
bearing shells, articulated rod bushing, gaskets and necessary fasteners.
• This offer is made contingent upon CES labor being performed utilizing proprietary
tooling to remove/replace connecting rods which eliminates the need to remove power
cylinder heads, pistons and top side fuel, water and Intake air headers. All customers
have the option to perform the connecting rod removaltreplacement providing their own
labor. Should any customer wish to perform additional engine maintenance, i.e. power
cylinder liner, piston and rings, or power cylinder head reconditioning at this opportunity,
CES will provide a competitive quote for such additional labor and/or parts.
• However, for any connecting rod that is still covered under the original warranty of
purchase, the reconditioning of the connecting rod will be performed in accordance with
the applicable warranty.
• The following constitutes the beneficial life formula to determine the cost to customers.
No. of Encine Hours x Customer Cost = Net Customer Cost 200,000
(a) Beneficial life of connecting rod at 200,000 hours
(b) Customer cost per each rod reconditioning includes a new set of Conn rod
bearing shells, articulated rod bushing, side cover door gaskets and necessary
fasteners at a price of$7,228.00 per Conn rod
(c) CES labor to remove/replace conn rods per engine at the following:
12-cylinder engine at$12,341.00
16-cylinder engine at$15,197.00
20-cylinder engine at$18.073.00
Example
The following example calculates a 12-cylinder engine (6 rods) having attained 20,000
hours of operation:
Conn rod reconditioning per(b) above:
20,000 hrs x $7,228 =$722.80 each x 6 rods or$4,336.80 total
200,000 hrs.
Labor.
12-cylinder engine from (c) above$12,341.00
Page 5 of 5
July 25. 1997
20,000 hrs. x $12,341.00 =$1,234.10 total
200,000 hrs.
Thus the 12-cylinder engine customer cost at 20,000 operation hours would equal:
Rod reconditioning (6 rods) $4,336.80
Labor to removetreplace 1,234.10
Total $5 570 CO
• All work performed by Cooper Energy Services is per standard terns and conditions
attached.
• Until the connecting rods are replaced or reconditioned, CES strongly recommends that
the ultrasonic inspection be continued at 500-hour intervals. CES is confident of its
reconditioning program, but does recommend an ongoing ultrasonic inspection program
at 1000-hour intervals following the reconditioning or replacement of the connecting
rods.
• We realize that this formula will not precisely measure the operational life of each rod in
service. However, it is based on numbers that are readily available to us for all customers.
This offers ease of administration that will be critical if we are to schedule and implement this
program as quickly and effectively as possible for all customers. We promise you an all out
effort on our part, but will need a large degree of cooperation and understanding from our
customers if we are to get this problem fixed in a way that is fair to everyone. We will attempt
to accommodate each customer's needs when it comes to scheduling service and delivery,
but obviously we will be limited in the number of customers we can serve at any one time.
Please contact Mike Marks as follows to discuss scheduling or any other questions you may have:
Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating Products Division
150 Lincoln Avenue
Grove City, PA 16127
Telephone: 412.458-3537
FAX:412-458-3525
E-mail: memarks®cooper-energy-services.com
Sincerely,
�v
Mi6hae &44
Senior Field Engineer
MEM:mis
Copy: R. M. Cote
K. M. Rapp
S
x
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT[MN
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, May 4, 2000, at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County
Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 4, 1999, at 6 p.m., in the District's Operations
Center at Plant 2.
After a tour of several projects at Plant 2, Chair Eckenrode called the meeting to
order at 6 p.m.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Norm Eckenrode, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations &
Steve Anderson Maintenance
Guy Carrozzo Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Lynn Daucher John Linder, Construction Manager
Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor
Gerald Sigler Jon Thomsic, Project Manager
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Mike White, Controller
Terri Josway, Safety Manager
Directors Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Jan Debay, Board Chair
Russell Patterson OTHERS PRESENT:
Christina Shea Bill Knopf, Carollo Engineers
Lee Badertscher, Lee and Ro
Dennis Kasper, Parsons
Phil Peterson, Spec Services
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
7
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 2
July 1, 1999
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the April 6, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
(7) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Director of Engineering David Ludwin indicated that an agenda Hem was being presented to the
FAHR Committee regarding a$200,000 increase in temporary contract employee services budget for
the remainder of FY 1999-00, and an increase in the budget for FY 2000-01 to$2.4 million. It is
anticipated that an additional engineer and several construction managers and inspectors will be
required for the increase in the capital improvement program.
(6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
(9) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Mr. Ludwin reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and Construction Manager John Linder
reviewed the report on Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%).
There were two change orders that required PDC Committee approval.
(10) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT
Mr. Ludwin reported that there was one Professional Services Agreement (PSA)approved by the
General Manager during the past month.
(11) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT
Mr. Ludwin reported that one task contract was awarded.
a
PDC Committee Minutes
Page 3
July 1, 1999
(12) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM(GWRS)STATUS REPORT
Jim Herberg updated the members on the GW RS activities. The federal EIS record of determination
is expected in mid-May. This approval is necessary if federal funds are requested. Of the 32 Design
Memoranda, 22 should be finalized by August. A Board Workshop is scheduled for July 15 to review
the project and to discuss the framework for the governance of the project. The Organization
Implementation Plan will be presented to the Joint Coordinating Committee in August or September.
(13) ACTION ITEMS(Items a-d)
a. POCOO-35 (1)Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido
Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1,for a total revised project
budget of$3,475,762; (2) Ratify Change Order No.5 to Relocation
of Lido Pump Station, Contract No.5.41-1,with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$92,891 and 85
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,390,547;
and (3)Accept Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-41,1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Complefion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with
Advanoo Constructors, Inc.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
b. PDCOO.36 (1)Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to
Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant
No. 1,Job No. P1-40-1,to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at
Reclamation Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid),for a total
revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid);
(2) Ratify Change Order No.4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four
Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4(Rebid),
with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of
$47,289, and a time extension of 40 calendar days, increasing the
total contract amount to$954,229;and (3) Accept Seismic Retrofit
of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1,Job No. Pt-44-4
(Rebid), with Ark Construction Company as complete, authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final
Closeout Agreement.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
C. PDCOO-37 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons
Engineering Science, Inc.for Area Classification Study
Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No. J-35-2,for an
amount not to exceed$2,255,680.
PDC Committee Minutes d
Page 4
July 1, 1999
Jon Thomsic reviewed the process leading to the recommendation
under consideration and explained the reasons for the
recommendation of other than the low bidder. He indicated that
consultant recommended variances from the standards of
NFPA820 will be submitted to OSHA for review before any
changes are made.
It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
d. PDC00-38 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for
design of Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No.J-77,for a total
amount not to exceed$2,208,810.
Matt Smith explained the reasons for the staff recommendation.
After the initial proposal evaluations, and Black&Veatch was
chosen based on the strengths exhibited during interviews with the
two top proposers.
It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval.
(14) INFORMATIONAL ITEM
a. PDC00-39 Proposed FY 2000-01 Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets.
Information only item.
Mike White presented the draft FY 2000.01 Joint Works Operating
and Capital budgets for comment and discussed the changes from
the FY 1999-00 budget. Staff will address the reserves in light of
the Little Hoover Commission report that was just released. David
Ludwin discussed the Capital Improvement Budget and the types
of projects that are Included. Each project will be detailed in the
final budget.
(15) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
(17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
y PDC Committee Minutes
Page 5
July 1, 1999
(18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
June 1, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(20) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Submitted by:
J a Tappan
Committee Secretary
N:Nq.Me�aMeNMt. W]JAlnule5N504CO POC MInutm.Ea
PDCCOMMITTEE Meesioanngr000ett r s Ra xea6
AGENDA REPORT 1a Number Item Numiw
POCo 35 15(c)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve a budget amendment of$80,562 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-41-1, for a total revised project budget of$3,475,762; (2) Ratify Change
Order No. 5 to Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. authorizing an addition of$92,891 and 85 calendar days, increasing
the total contract amount to $2,390,547. and (3) Accept Relocation of Lido Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors,
Inc.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 5 includes 12 items of added work and 6 credit items including an
item for liquidated damages in the amount of$22,000 to Contract No. 5-41-1. There is a
85 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages
are $1000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The budget for this project is
increased from $3,395,200 to $3,475,762 to provide additional funds for the change
order and construction staff costs.
Contract Start Date April 13, 1998
Original Contract Completion Date June 6, 1999
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 5
Current Contract Completion Date August 30, 1999
Actual Completion Date September 21, 1999
Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 22
Liquidated Damages Assessment $22,000
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $2,196,376.00
Previous Authorized Change $ 101,280.00
This Change Order (add) $ 92,891.00
Change Orders to Date $ 194,171.00
Percentage Increase 8.84%
Amended Contract Price $2,390,547.00
These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered
in the design phase. The City of Newport Beach will reimburse the District for Items 11
and 16. r
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
Negative Declaration No. 97111079 approved on 1-26-98 by City of Newport Beach
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Table
3. Change Order History
4. Change Order
TH:MB:Ic
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Project Development $ $
Design Staff $ 56,000 $ 134,600 $ 134.600 $ 134.600 $ 134,600 $ 134,600 100%
Consultant PSA $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25.000 $ 24,608 98%
Construction Contract 5 699.600 $ 2.297.656 $ 92,891 $ 2.390.547 $ 2.297,656 $ 92,891 $ 2.390.547 $ 2,338,876 98%
Construction(Other)** $ 49,400 $ 66,086 $ 66,086 $ 66,086 $ 66,086
Construction Staff $ 90,000 $ 807.855 $ 26,674 $ 834,529 $ 807,855 $ 26,674 $ 834.529 $ 812,807 97%
Contingency $ 39,003 $ (39,003) $ - $
TOTAL $ 895.000 $ 3.395.200 $ 80.562 $ 3,475,762 $ 3,331,197 $ 119.565 $ 3,450,762 $ 3,310.891 96%
Includes Reimbursement to City of Newport Beach for Design.Purchase of Easement.Contribution from City of Newport Beach,and Reimbursement to CSDS for City Sewers
&41-1 outlyetoLrad
Revisetl OWWOo0
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
CONTRACT NO. 5-41-1
ITEM
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 04/13/98 $ 2,196,376.00 $ 2,196,376.00 420 420
CO NO, 1' 03/04/99 $ 15,496.00 $ 2,211,872.00 0.71% 0 420
CO NO. 2' 08/02/99 $ 15,918.00 $ 2,227,790.00 1.48% 0 420
CO NO. 3' 12/22/99 $ 31,490.00 $ 2,259,280.00 2.86% 0 420
CO NO. 4" 02/03/00 $ 38,376.00 $ 2,297,656.00 4.61% 0 420
CO NO. 5 Pending $ 92,891.00 $ 2,390,547.00 8.84% 85 505
'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23
Approved by the PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23
541-1 COSTATc.S
O '
0
CHANGE ORDER HISTORY
Relocation of Lido Pump Station
Contract No. 5-41-1
Change Order No. 1 —GM Approval 03/04/99
Item No. Description Amount Da s Type
1 Conduit Schedule Revisions $ 9,233.00 0 Omission
2 PLC Revisions 8,088.00 0 Omission
3 Miscellaneous Control Revs 3,810.00 0 Omission
4 Revise Central Processors (2,216.00) 0 Design Change
5 Delete Computer 7 853.00 0 Design Change
6 Revise Waterproofing 3,546.00 0 Omission
7 HVAC Coil Coaling 889.00 0 Design Change
Total Change Order No. 1 $ 15 496.00 0
Change Order No. 2—GM Approval 08/02/99
Item No. Description Amount Days Type
1 Remove Undisclosed Asphalt $ 1,781.00 0 Changed Condition
2 Conduit Penetrations 883.00 0 Design Change
3 Control Building Stucco 2388.00 0 Design Change
4 Driveway Reinforcing Steel 891.00 0 Design Change
5 Relocate Power Feed 1,847.00 0 Changed Condition
6 Rotate Manhole 828.00 0 Design Change
7 Relocate Panel 778.00 0 Design Change
8 Piping Modifications 810.00 0 Design Change
9 Revise Bleeder Line 2,253.00 0 1 Design Change
10 Revise Force Main B Drain 2,039.00 0 Desi n Change
11 Delete Wetwell Liner (1,700.00) 0 Desi n Change
12 Reroute Air Duct 3120.00 0 Desi n Change
Total Change Order No. 2 $ 15 918.00 0
Change Order No. 3—GM Approval 12/22/99
Item No. Description Amount Days Type
1 Revised Traffic Control $ 15 418.00 0 Design Change
2 Warning Signs $230.00 0 Design Change
3 Repair Existing Force Main $8 031.00 0 Changed Condition
4 Pump Bleeder Lines $ 1 731.00 0 Design Change
5 MCC Revisions $ 8 080.00 0 Omission
8 Reduce Retention 0.00 0 Other
Total Change Order No. 3 $ 31 400.00 0
v
Change Order History
Contract No. 5-41-4
Change Order No. 4—PDC Approval 02/03100
item No. I Description Amount Days Type
1 Adjustment of Engineers $38,376.00 0 Other
Quantifies
Total Change Order No.4 1 $38 376.00 1 0
Change Order No. 5—Board Approval 04/24/00
Item No. Description Amount No's
Type
1 Temporary SCE Conduit $26 023.00 Changed Condition
2 Revise Manhole No. 23 780.00Design Change
3 Undisclosed Utilities 30,897.00Changed Condition
4 Post Installation Videos 1,986.00Design Change
5 Misc. Control Upgrades 13 876 .00 Desi n Chan e
6 Relocate Jobsile Materials 5,765.00Other
7 Outside Lights 1 145.0DDesign Change
8 Delete Deck Coating3,604.00Design Change
9 Revised Demolition 4 000.00 0 Design Change
10 Factory Test Reimbursement (1,690.00) 0 Other
11 Additional Traffic Striping 8,174.00 0 Work Not Related
12 Security Cage 180400 0 Desl n Change
13 Revised Mix Desi n (6,482.00) 0 Design Change
14 Revised Equipment Tags 16 607.00 21 Design Change
'IS Revised Shorina 2,854.00 0 Changed Condition
16 Paving Coordination 9 872.00 0 Work Not Related
17 Resolution of Dis ute 12 444.00 0 Design Change
18 Liquidated Dama es 22 000.00 0 Other
TOTAL $ 92 891.00 85
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 1 —5 $194,171.00 85 DAYS
Page 1 of 10
Y
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Dale: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
Amount of this Change Order(Add) (9eduet) $ 92,891.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONDUIT FOR OVERHEAD POWER LINES
This item is for labor, materials, and equipment to install a temporary conduit for Southern
California Edison high voltage power lines serving the area around the jobsite. These power
lines were originally routed overhead on poles and were scheduled to be relocated by Southern
California Edison prior to the Notice to Proceed for this project. The Edison project did not
complete the work on schedule, preventing the start of shoring operations for the pump station.
The power lines had to be temporarily rerouted below grade in conduits to allow construction to
proceed. This item provided the conduit. Southern California Edison rerouted the power lines.
This item includes $ 18,798 for Contractor extended overhead associated with the time
extension. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(6)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $26,023.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 39 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 —REDUCE DIAMETER OF MANHOLE 23
This item is to reduce the diameter of Manhole No. 23 to the City of Newport Beach standard
diameter of 60 inches. The City owns this manhole. The contract drawings required 72" diameter
manholes. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-3)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (780.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
_ Page 2 of 10
y
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Dale: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 3— UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES
This item is for removing undisclosed utilities and structures interfering with the installation of
Sewer Lines B, C and D. The undisclosed utilities included an abandoned storm sewer,
abandoned timbers, steel pipe, clay pipe, and manhole structures. This item also includes
rerouting service laterals serving adjacent homes on Line C. None of the utilities were shown on
the contract documents. This item includes $2.892 for Contractor extended overhead
associated with the time extension. This Rem was accomplished by the Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 30,897.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days
ITEM 4—POST INSTALLATION 'VIDEOS
This item is for providing videotapes of the interior of the completed Sewer Lines C and D as
requested by the City of Newport Beach. The contract documents reference a City of Newport
Beach standard specification specifying that the City is responsible for providing the videos. This
item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411.11)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1.986.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 10
e
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24. 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 5—MISCELLANEOUS CONTROL UPGRADES
This item is for providing labor, materials, and equipment to install control features required for
the station. The features include:
a) Wiring for control relays R6 and R7 to provide a jog switch function for pumps
b) Replacement of generator receptacle compatible with District Generator
c) Thermostat switch for Control Room Temperature Alarm
d) Current switches for air conditioner fail signal
e) Current switch for Exhaust Fan No. 3
f) Revisions in programmable logic controller program
g) Control logic revisions
h) Installation of feeder cables for MCC A
i) Hinges for explosion proof panel
j) Applicable record drawing revisions
These features upgraded the controls to District control standards and were not required by the
contract documents. There is no Contractor extended overhead associated with this item. This
item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-17)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 13,876.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 19 Calendar Days
ITEM 6— RELOCATE JOBSITE MATERIALS
This item is for additional cost to move pipe, backfill, and equipment stored onsite to Plant No. 2.
The City of Newport Beach requested the pump station yard be vacated to allow a landscaping
contractor to begin landscaping the area for a City project. The materials were brought back to
the site when needed for installation. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 1 D-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-18)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $5.765.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 10
a
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 7—OUTSIDE LIGHTS
This item is for additional labor and materials to revise one exterior light to an architectural
downlight and to provide a switch for other exterior lights. The downlight, which minimizes glare
to the neighborhood, is located at the front door and is always on to provide access lighting for
crews called out at night. The other exterior lights can be switched on as needed for emergency
work. The contract documents called for exterior lights that come on automatically at night.
However, the lights are bright and could be a nuisance to adjacent residents. This item was
accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,145.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8—DELETE ELASOTMERIC DECK COATING
This item is a credit to eliminate an elastomeric coating of the concrete top of the pump station.
The coating is not necessary and would require periodic maintenance. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO 5411-22)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (3,604.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 9—REVISED DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PUMP STATION
The item is a credit to reduce the depth of demolition of the existing pump station concrete
structure. The existing station is adjacent to several homes. The reduced depth allowed for a
smaller and shallower excavation to minimize impact on homeowners during demolition. This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-23)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $(4,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 10
d
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5.41-1
ITEM 10— FACTORY TEST REIMBURSEMENT
This item provides reimbursement for travel cost for District personnel to attend factory testing of
the sewage pumps. The contract specifies that the Contractor shall reimburse the District for
the cost to attend factory tests. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-26)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (1,690.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 —ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC STRIPING
This item is for additional traffic striping at the intersection of Newport Boulevard and Via Lido.
The majority of this additional striping is to finish striping scheduled to be completed as part of an
adjacent Caltrans project at the intersection of the Pacific Coast Highway and Newport
Boulevard. The striping scheduled to be completed as part of the Caltrans project could not be
accomplished until street work on this project was finished. The City of Newport Beach
requested that work be completed at the same time as final traffic striping for this project to
minimize traffic disruption. This item also includes the replacement of wom out striping and
crosswalks at the intersection that were not included in the scope of this contract, but requested
by the City to provide all new striping at the intersection. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-27)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 8,174.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 12 —SECURITY CAGE
This item is to install a security cage around the back0ow preventor on the potable water supply
and the receptacle for standby generators. This equipment is located outside in a public area.
The cage protects the equipment from vandalism and was not required by the contract. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO 5411-28)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,804.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 6 of 10
° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Dale: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 13—REVISED CONCRETE MIX DESIGN FOR CLASS A CONCRETE
This item is a credit item to revise the concrete mix design for 246 cubic yards of Class A
concrete. The concrete for the pump station walls, deck, and control building was affected by
this change. These revisions provide a mix design similar to the District standard mix design
providing more workable concrete. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 5411-9)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (6,482.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 14—REVISED EQUIPMENT TAGS AND WIRE NUMBERS
This item is to revise loop tag numbers to comply with latest District standards for equipment and
wire identification. The additional costs include revisions to equipment tags, wire tags, loop
drawings, panel drawings, and record drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 5411-18)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 16,607.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 21 Calendar Days
ITEM 15— REVISED TRENCH SHORING
This item is for additional labor and materials to revise the shoring for the excavation of Sewer
Line A. The existing sewer that Manhole No. 15 was to be constructed on was found to be two
feet west of the location shown on the drawings. This shortened the length of Sewer Line A that
routed to the new pump station wet well. The Contractor was unable to utilize the trench shield
designed for the sewer as it did not fit between the wet well and the manhole. This item was
accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5411-6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $2,854.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 7 of 10
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT °
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 16—PAVING COORDINATION WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
This item is for additional base paving, paving overlays, paving subcontractor move-ins, and curb
subcontractor move-ins requested by the City of Newport Beach as described below:
a) Additional paving move-in and overlay on Newport Boulevard, south of Short Street, to
provide finish paving prior to the summer tourist season.
b) Additional base paving, paving overlay, paving move-in, and curb and gutter move-in to
coordinate the completion of the work with another contract associated with the City of
Newport Beach, which was also scheduled to pave on Newport Boulevard. The paving was
completed on this project to minimize impact to the public traveling on Newport Boulevard.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 9,872.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 17— RESOLUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DISPUTE
This item is a settlement of a request for equitable adjustment for electrical engineering services
performed by the electrical subcontractor during the construction of the work as detailed below:
a) Design of the motor control center. This item is no additional cost to the District.
b) Cost for miscellaneous control revisions not included in previous changes.
c) Cost to complete record drawings to reflect District plan changes and field change orders
where reimbursement was not previously requested.
d) Cost to assist in defining the scope of Plan Change 13, revising conduit layout and routing.
e) Cost to design the final layout of electrical equipment in the Pump Station Control Room.
The size of the room was limited.
f) Additional start up cost for troubleshooting of modem communication between the Pump
Station Control Room and Plant No. 1 Control Room and troubleshooting of the reactive air
level monitor. Other troubleshooting is at no additional cost to the District.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(a) of the General
Provisions,
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 12.444.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 8 of 10
' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24. 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
ITEM 18—LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
The Revised Final Completion Du--a Date is August 30, 1999, including all time extensions to
date. The Actual Contract Completion Date is September 21, 1999. This item is to withhold
Liquidated Damages or$ 1000Iday for a total of 22 calendar days in accordance with the
Contract Special Provision 50-8. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions,
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (22,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $92,891.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 85 Calendar Days
Page 9 of 10
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Date: May 24, 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime
work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time
made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 85-
day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or
indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be
incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: April 13, 1998
Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: June 6, 1999
Time Extension this C.O. 85 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 85 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 505 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 30, 1999
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 22 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date: September 21, 1999
Original Contract Price $ 2,196,376.00
Prey. Authorized Changes $ 101,280.00
This Change (Add) $ 92,891.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,390,547.00
Page 10 of 10
w
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: Five (5)
Dale: Mav 24. 2000
Job: Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1
Board Authorization Date: May 24, 2000
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Submitted by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Date
Accepted by:
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS
Contractor Date
,I PDC COMMITTEE Weing ! TO -24-W .
s-aoo szam
AGENDA REPORT '10 36 "�14(d)�
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager
SUBJECT: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. 131 44 4 (REBID)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Authorize a budget transfer of$200,000 from Modifications to Electrical and Control
Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, to Seismic Retrofit
of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid), for a total
revised project budget of$1,529,000 for Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid); (2) Ratify Change
Order No. 4 to Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. Pt-44-4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, authorizing an addition of
$47,289, and a time extension of 40 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount
to $954,229; and (3) Accept Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1 44 4 (Rebid), with Ark Construction Company, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement.
SUMMARY
Change Order No. 4 includes two items of added work and a time extension to Job
No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). There is a 40 calendar day time extension associated with this
change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no
bonus provisions. A portion of the work performed under Job No. P1-34-4 (Rebid) was
budgeted under Job No. P1-40-1. A transfer of$200,000 from Job No. P1-40-1 is
required to pay for additional work performed under Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid).
Contract Start Date April 14, 1999
Original Contract Completion Date October 10, 1999
Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4
Current Contract Completion Date April 1, 2000
Actual Completion Date April 1, 2000
Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0
Liquidated Damage Assessment 0
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Original Contract Price $ 618,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 288,940.00
This Change (CO No. 4, Add) $ 47,289.00
Change Orders To Date $ 336,229.00
Percentage Increase To Date 54.41 %
Final Contract Price $ 954,229.00
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (CIP: Section 8—Page 77) ,
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
A transfer$200,000 is requested to be made to Job No. P1-444 (Rebid) budget from
Job No. P1-40-1 budget. A portion of the scope of work, Waterproofing and Sealing of
the Administration Building, originally planned under Job No. P140-1 was
accomplished under Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). This budget transfer will provide funding
for this work. Budget tables for both jobs are attached.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Job No. P1 A4-4 (Rebid), Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, provides for additional structural supports for the Blower Building, Dewatering
Building "C", Belt Press Building "M", and the Administration Building to bring these
structures up to current seismic code requirements. The work also includes sealing
and waterproofing the exterior of the Administration Building. Holmes and Narver
prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Ark Construction
Company on January 27, 1999. The contract is 100% complete.
The following summarizes Change Order No. 4:
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Shear Wall Additions to the $33,480 40 Design Change
Administration Building
2 Construct New Perimeter Foundation and $13,809 0 Design Change
Reseal Bottom of Storefront Window
System on the Administration Building
Total —Change Order No. 4 $47,289 40
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEOA FINDINGS
This project is included in a previously approved master Plan/EIR. The Final EIR was
approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989.
Page 2
ATTACHMENTS
p
r 1. Budget Information Table— Job No. Pt-44-7(Rebid)
2. Budget Information Table — Job No. P1-40-1
3. Change Order Status Report
4. Change Order History
5. Change Order
H1wp.dla%agendWBoard Agenda Reports12000 Board Agenda ReporlsV) Vtera 14(d).doc
JF:lc
Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1
JOB NO. P1-44-4 (Rebid)
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETETO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%)
Project Development
Design Staff $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 100%
Consultant PSA $ 180.000 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,000 1 $ 180,OD0 1 $ 180.000 100%
Construction Contract $ 900,000 $ 906,940 47,289 $ 954.229 S 906,940 $ 47,289 $ 954,229 $ 906.940 95%
Construction(Other)
Construction Staff $ 129,000 $ 129,000 245.771 $ 374,771 $ 129,000 245771 $ 374.771 $ 348,839 93%
Contingency $ 93,060 (93,060)
TOTAL $ 1,229,000 $ 1,329,000 200,000 1 $ 1.529.000 $ 1,235.940 $ 293,060 $ 1.529,000 $ 7455,779 118%
NOTE: A transfer of$200.000 is requested to be made from Job No. P1-40-1 budget to Job No. P7-44-4(rebid)budget.
H:1wp.dt.Wr,g obsmnt,MsW1J4iReb418ud9e1.InI.M.on.Table
Remsed 4/1312000
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-40-1
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
Consultant PSA $ 300.000 $ 163,500 $ (19.200) $ 144,300 5 152.050 $ - $ 152,050 $ 142.928 94%
District-Design Phase $ 200.000 $ 103.600 $ (5,000) $ 98,600 v' $ 82.000 $ - $ 82.000 $ 72.000 88%
Construction Contract $ 2,298,000 1 $ 25.800 $ (25,800) $ - ,*�.', $ - 0%
District-Construction
Phase $ 250.000 $ - $ - $ - r $ 161,000 $ 161,000 $ 29,224 18%
_Contingency $ $ - $ - $ 0%
Other $ 12.000 $ 150.000 $ (150.000) $ - ;.j $ 11,000 $ 11.000 $ 0%
TOTAL $ 3.060.000 $ 442.900 $ (200,000) $ 242,900 $ 406,050 $ - $ 406,050 $ 244,152 29%
NOTE: A transfer of$200,000 is requested to be made from Job No. Pt-40.1 budget to Job No. P7-44-4(rebid)budget.
H%"dlaWW%budge0eudaeroLrevis 000413
Revised 411W200o
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-44-4 (REBID)
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE
(CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)
CONTRACT 04/14/1999 $ 618,000.00 $ 618,000.00 0.00% 180 180
CO NO. 1' 11/08/1999 $ 14,032.00 $ 632,032.00 2.27% 0 180
CO NO. 2 12/02/1999 $ 56,368.00 $ 688,400,00 1 11.39% 1 14 194
CO NO, 3 02/23/2000 $ 218,540.00 $ 906,940.00 46.75% 120 314
CO NO. 4 Pending $ 47,289.00 $ 954,229.00 54.41% 40 354
*Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23
H.WactatengYoba and wnlractaWl 44-4 REBID\Change Otdete=Aatatus nls
CHANGE ORDER HISTORY
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. Pt-444 (Rebid)
Change Order No. 1 —GM Approval 11/08/99
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Repair Existing Wood Window $ 1,080.00 0 Design Change
Frames
2 Seal Vertical Expansion Joint in 4,680.00 0 Design Change
Aluminum Plaster Screed
3 Rout and Seal Edges of Aluminum 8,272.00 0 Omission
Plaster Screed
Total Change Order No. 1 $14,032.00 0
Change Order No. 2—PDC Approval 12/02/99
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Removal and Disposal of Asbestos $56,368.00 0 Changed Condition
Contaminated Ceiling in the
Administration Building Engineering
De artment
Total—Change Order No. 2 $56 368.00 0
Change Order No. 3 —BD Approval 02/23/00
Item Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade $ 5796.00 0 Omission
of the Blower Buildin
2 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade 39,780.00 0 Omission
of Belt Press Buildin M
3 Modifications to the Seismic Upgrade 23,012.00 60 Changed Condition
of the Administration Buildin
4 Repainting Existing Wood Windows 20,152.00 0 Design Change
on the Administration Building I
5 Recaulking Storefront Window 51,284.00 0 Design Change
System on the Administration
Buildin
6 Reseal Parapet Cap on the 30,516.00 0 Design Change
Administration Buildin
7 Seismic Investigation and Repair of 48,000.00 60 Changed Condition
the Administration Buildin
Total—Change Order No. 3 $218 540.00 120
Change Order History
Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid)
Change Order No. 4—Board Approval 05124M
KIM Description Amount Days Type
No.
1 Shear Wall Additions to the $33,480.00 40 Design Change
Administration Building
2 Constrict New Perimeter Foundation 13,809.00 0 Design Change
and Reseal Bottom of Storefront
Window System
on the Adminstration Building
Total—Change Order No. 4 $47,289.00 40
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 1 —4 $336,229.00 160 DAYS
Page 1 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-9127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: May 4. 2000
Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid)
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduet) $47,289.00
In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 —SHEAR WALL ADDITIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
The Contractor was directed to construct or modify the fallowing shear walls in the Administration
Building as required by the Design Engineer.
A. Add new shear wall along gridline 2.2 between gridlines D and E.
B. Reconstruct existing shear wall along gridline 6 between gridlines C and D.
C. Reconstruct existing shear wall along gridline E between gridlines 1.2 and 2.
D. Add new shear wall along gridline J between gridlines 9 and 10.
This additional work on the above shear walls was added during the opening up and checking of
existing walls in the Administration Building under Change Order No. 3, item 7. It was discovered that
two shear walls required upgrading to current seismic standards and two shear walls were not installed
per plan during construction of the original building. This work was not included in the original contract
and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Ref. Plan Change No. 10)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $33,480.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 40 Calendar Days
ITEM 2—CONSTRUCT NEW PERIMETER FOUNDATION AND RESEAL BOTTOM OF
STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM ON THE ADMINSTRATION BUILDING
The Contractor was directed to construct a new foundation at the base of the existing aluminum
storefront window system on the Administration Building in the landscaped areas near the front
entrance and interior courtyard. The work included excavation, formwork, installation of reinforcing
steel, placement of concrete and removal and replacement of the existing irrigation system where it
interfered with the new foundation. The existing aluminum storefront window system was then
resealed to the new perimeter foundation. During resealing of the existing storefront window system, it
was found that water had been leaking into the building under the bottom window mullions. This was
due to an inadequate extension of the existing foundation past the storefront window system on the
original building. This work was not included in the original contract and was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) of the General Provisions. (Ref. FCO No. 5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,809.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $47,289.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 40 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4)
Date: Mav 4. 2000
Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. P7-44-4 (Ret id
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 40-calendar day
extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect,
incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Dale: April 14, 1999
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: October 10, 1999
Time Extension this C.O.: 40 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 174 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 354 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 1, 2000
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: April 1, 2000
Original Contract Price $ 618,000.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 288,940.00
This Change (Add) (Bedeel) $ 47,289.00
Amended Contract Price $ 954,229.00
Page 3 of 3
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
1011" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Ark Construction Company C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: May 4, 2000
Job: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. Pt-44-4 (Rabid
Board Authorization Date: May 24. 2000
ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT
Submitted by:
Construction Manager Date
Approved by:
Director of Engineering Dale
Accepted by:
ARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Contractor Date
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dx To Ba•
5/4/00 5/24/00
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
PD000-37 14(e)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AREA
CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PLANT
NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35-2
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION'
Approve Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and No. 2, Job
No. J-35-2, for an amount not to exceed $2,255,680.
SUMMARY
The recently completed Area Classification Study of both plants has provided the
District with a uniform documentation system showing potential fire and explosion
hazard locations throughout the plants. The study identified many conditions that met
code requirements at the time of construction, but are in violation of current code
requirements. The study evaluated various options to bring all facilities into compliance
with the latest OSHA/code standards.
Compliance with hazardous location installation requirements is mandated for all
facilities by the National Electric Code (NEC). Electrical hazardous area requirements
under the NEC are retroactive and therefore must be applied to existing facilities.
Potentially hazardous areas must be built using special methods and materials.
Implementation of these projects will provide the District with full National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) compliance identified in the Area Classification Study.
The next step is to generate detailed construction documents based on the study
recommendations. Staff has solicited proposals from four firms. Based on the proposal
evaluation and interviews, Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services
Agreement (PSA) for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for both Plant
Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, to Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total amount of the agreement will not exceed $2,255,680. Please refer to the
attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The Board approved an initial budget amendment of$6,069.664 for two projects: J-35-2 r
and J-35-3 on October 27, 1999. The Board approved an additional budget amendment
of$22,405,756 for three projects: J-35-4; J-35-5; and J-35-6 on December 15, 1999,
Funds for these projects are to be consolidated in project J-35-2 for a total of
$28,475,420.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
Area classification is defined as establishing boundaries between areas with varying risk
for potential explosion. A hazardous location is normally defined as a location where
fire or explosion hazards exist due to the potential presence of flammable gases or
vapors, flammable liquids, etc. Class 1, Division 1 is a location where an explosive
mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist under normal operating conditions. Class 1,
Division 2 is a location in which an explosive mixture of gas, vapor, etc., may exist
under abnormal conditions such as accidental rupture of a vessel or container, or failure
of a ventilating system.
Documentation of area classification for hazardous locations is required for all existing
facilities by the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70), 1999 Edition. The National Electric
Code requires that the District follow standards for Fire Protection in Wastewater
Treatment and Collection Facilities (NFPA 820), 1995 Edition. The National Electric
Code also requires all hazardous areas be upgraded to current standards. The purpose
for this project, J-35-3, is to comply with NFPA 820 and reduce the potential for
explosion by reducing the area classification from Class 1, Division 1, to Class 1,
Division 2; or Class 1, Division 2 to non-hazardous area.
The Area Classification Study, Job No. J-35-1, was initiated and approved by the Board
on September 23, 1998. The study identified and documented the hazardous locations
by creating area classification drawings. Code deficiencies in the plants were noted.
Alternative solutions to code violations were examined and the most cost-effective
designs were selected for implementation. The recommended course of action for the
full compliance with NFPA 820 is tabulated in the Final Report of the Area Classification
Study.
Purpose
The purpose of this PSA is to take the study recommendations through the design
process and produce construction documents. Implementation of the design will bring
the District into full compliance with NFPA 820.
Budget History
The Board approved budgets for Job No. J-35-2, Gas Piping Relocation/Physical
Separation, and Job No. J-35-3, Administrative Control Program on October 27, 1999.
As directed by the Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee, Staff is
accelerating the remaining projects. Consequently, five projects are recommended for
implementation.
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan
JOB NO.J-35 Summary
'ORIGINAL 'CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED 'PROJECT BUDGET REVISED' ' AUTHORZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATEI%1
J46.1 Pm'ect Devel ment $ 1.000.000 $ 1145000 $ 1145000 $ 1145000 $ 1,145000 S 706,000 62%
J-35-2 Dssl nSUIT $ $78440 876,140 6 876440 $ 878440
1362 ConsulMnt PSA S 3353599 It 3.387599 $ 2265.680 S 2.255680
l35.2 Construction Concoct S 17 241892 1 11117.241.992 S
J-35.2 construction(Other) $ 47441 $ 43"1 $
J-35.2 Construction Stan It 2226463 $ 2225463 $
J-35-2 contingency $ 4.704.486 It 4.704 486 $
TOTAL $ 1,000.000 S 29,620,420 $29,620.420 $ 1,145,000 $ 3,132.12D $ 4,277,120 $ 706A00 17%
Notes:J-35-1 is the Area Classification Study and J-35-2 is the Implementatlon Plan.
The current project budget for J-35-1 is$ 1,145,000.
The current project budget for J-35-2 is$28,475,420.
The project budget total is$29,620,420.
N:",ft BS a CONTMCMU Zu 3s2&AWWd =Tewe.Wsp'35 Cm e
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan
Job No. J-35-2
Total Project Budget: $28,475,420
Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
Start Date of Project: May 24. 2000
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
Proposed Original Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for $2,255,680 $0
PSA Plant Nos. 1 and 2
H:1wp.dtaten9UOBS 8 CONTRACTSU-35-2U-35-2 PSA Status Report doc 03I2WO
ReWsed O5/14/98
1
AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
AT PLANT NOS. 1 &2
JOB NO. J-35-2
Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services
The following interested consulting fines received Requests for Proposals:
• Brown and Caldwell
• Lee & Ro, Inc.
• Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
• Spec Services
Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. partnered with Lee& Ro, Inc. for this project. As
a result, three responsive proposals were received on February 8, 2000. Formal
interviews were conducted on February 16, 2000. The review panel consisted of
four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in the six
categories described below:
1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the
team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their
approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown.
2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rate the team's project
management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the
tasks.
3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total
number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it
relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates
the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the
design and construction support for this project.
4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational
background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of
Work for this project.
5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the
appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to
consultant teams.
6. Proposed Schedule —Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and
can the Consultant meet the schedule.
After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the three '
consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following
summarizes the attached ranking results for the three fines:
1. Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 1349 Points
2. Brown and Caldwell 1196 Points
3. Spec Services 1180 Points
The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms:
Parsons Engineerina Science. Inc. (Parsons)
1. Parsons has proposed an "integrated approach"which allows for optimization
of the design between the project elements to reduce the construction costs
to the District. All four project elements will be addressed simultaneously
which allows for identification of the most cost effective solution. The
approach will closely coordinate with Operations to minimize operational
disruptions to the facilities during the construction.
2. Parsons' Integrated approach will identify the complete solution for a given
area. This will facilitate and reduce the costs of review by the District. In
addition, the potential for change orders will be significantly reduced when
field conditions have changed or are otherwise not as presented in the Study
Report.
3. The Parsons approach incorporates several Improvements identified in the J-
42 Plant Reinvention Project. These improvements can be incorporated into
J-35-2 with little or no increased construction cost. A good example of this is
the use of pipe bridges between digesters, which allow for pedestrian traffic.
This improves access to the digester domes and eliminates loss of ground
access associated with pipe racks.
4. In accordance with the District's as-built document requirements, Parsons will
prepare the design documents to allow cost effective updating to reflect the
constructed as-built conditions.
5. Design details, guidelines and specifications prepared for J-35-2 will be
generalized and formatted for their inclusion in the District's standards for
design and construction. This provides consistency and uniformity
throughout the Districts' numerous ongoing projects within 6 months after
contract Initiation.
6. In existing facilities, NFPA recognizes that It is not always practical to strictly
apply all provisions of their standards. Physical limitations can necessitate
disproportionate effort and expense with little or no Increase in fire protection.
Parsons has over forty years of experience in the application of NFPA codes
" and OSHA Title 8 since its existence to provide cost effective compliance
without Increased risk to their clients.
7. The Parsons approach provides a "fresh look", which results in cost savings
to the District. For example, Parsons will re-evaluate and declassify the
sludge drying beds at Plant No. 2. This will be accomplished by simple
modification of our procedures to eliminate the addition of primary sludge to
the beds which is not practice. Declassification will reduce the costs of
removing dried sludge from the beds and will facilitate operation by having
consistency between Plant Nos. 1 and 2.
Brown and Caldwell
Brown & Caldwell presented a good solid engineering approach to this project based
on the previous Brown and Caldwell Area Classification Study. However, their
approach was not innovative enough to seek alternative economical solutions.
Spec Services
Spec Services also has the comprehensive understanding of the requirements of
this project. However, excessive man-hours are required to accomplish the Scope
of Work project elements. Consequently, they proposed the highest fees for this
project.
Summary
Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the
Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. team as their first choice of the three responsive
consultants.
After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee
proposals submitted by the three candidates.
The top-ranked consultant team of Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. submitted the
second lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Staff negotiated with
Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for a reduction in fee of$223,211 from the
proposed amount of$2,478,891 to the negotiated amount of$2,255,580. Though
their fees remained the second lowest of the three proposals, OCSD staff felt that
their thoroughness of the Scope warranted the additional proposed expense. Staff
recommends Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. be awarded the Professional
Services Agreement for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan at Plant Nos.
1 &2, Job No. J-35-2 for a total fee not to exceed $2,255,680.
MY.,jak
Hft p.dWengWBS&CONTRACTSU-35-2U-35-2 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALAM
AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
AT PLANT NOS. 1 & 2
JOB NO. J-35-2
STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Firm Parsons Eng. Science Brown and Caldwell Spec Services
Reviewer A 394 378 342
Reviewer B 304 238 278
Reviewer C 270 208 194
Reviewer D 381 372 366
Total Score 1349 1196 1180
1680 Points Maximum
Average Score 337 299 295
420 Points Maximum
Workforce Estimate 20343 13247 35388
Man-hours
100% Design Completion Proposed 52 52 52
Weeks
Proposed Not to Exceed Fee '$2,255,680 $1,599.483 $2,486,684
• The revised figures reflect negotiated revised amount.
PDC COMMITTEE We gDa TOBO.of Dir.
0'1L 00 Os/29/00
AGENDA REPORT fl> Number Item MMW
cocoo-3e 19rn
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR EFFLUENT PUMP
STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for design of the
Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for a total amount not to exceed
$2,208,810.
SUMMARY
The objective of the Effluent Pump Station Annex Project, Job No. J-77, is to replace
the existing Foster Pump Station with a new expandable facility that is capable of
providing adequate backup for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS) during excess
flow events and routine maintenance.
Originally, Project No. J-59, was to rehabilitate the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS).
Carollo Engineers performed a preliminary evaluation study to determine the feasibility
of the renovation of the FPS. The study concluded that for comparable cost, the District
could design and build a new structure (Effluent Pump Station Annex) which would far
exceed the capabilities that a renovated Foster Pump Station facility could provide. In
March, the Board approved a revision of the project from the renovation of the existing
FPS to the construction of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77. The new
project will use the funds originally slated for Job No. J-59.
A Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued to seven firms for the design of this new
Effluent Pump Station (EPS)Annex. Three consultants submitted proposals on
April 10, 2000: Black&Veatch, Brown and Caldwell, and Carollo Engineers. Staff
recommends the approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Black &
Veatch for a total amount not to exceed $2,208,810.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Authorization is being requested for the Consultant PSA and supporting OCSD design
staff costs.
See the attached Budget Information Table.
R. c Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 1999/2000 Budget Section 8,Page 178 and
Page 107, Contract No.J-59, $28.200,000) •
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
A request is made to move $320,000 from "Project Development" to the "Contingency
phase. These funds are not needed for the completion of the Project Development
phase, as this phase is essentially complete. Also, unneeded funds in the amount of
$2,433,210 are being moved from the"Consultant PSA" task to "Contingency".
The funds for this project are from Treatment Plant No. 2 Capital Improvement Budget
under Project Number J-59. The job name and number were changed under PDC item
number PDC00-02, with final approval from the Board of Directors on March 22, 2000.
A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this
contract.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Background
The original Foster Pump Station (FPS) structure is over 40 years old. Several minor
upgrades have been performed over the years. However, the age and overall condition
of the structure warrant major renovations to include structural and seismic upgrade,
electrical redesign, and mechanical replacements/repairs were the District to continue
use of this facility. The magnitude of these renovations prompted the District to perform
a preliminary study regarding the feasibility of upgrade versus replacement of the
existing facility. The cost of upgrading the FPS is comparable to that of building a new
annex facility. Therefore, it was decided to construct a new EPS Annex.
Proposal Evaluation
Seven engineering consulting firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the
required scope of services. Of these seven, three firms submitted proposals on April 10.
2000: Black & Veatch; Brown and Caldwell; and Carollo Engineers. Interviews for each
of these firms were held on April 18, 2000.
After the first round of interviews with the above firms, the review panel had additional
questions for two of the three firms, Carollo Engineers and Black and Veatch. The
members of the panel felt they needed additional information prior to the final rating of
the firms for selection. A second round of interviews was held on April 19, 2000. After
completion of these supplementary interviews, the proposals were evaluated and
ranked by Staff in accordance with District policy.
Black & Veatch had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach,
thorough understanding of the Scope of Work, similar large pump station experience,
innovative project management tools, and project team/subconsultant selection. See
R. SOH° Page 2
the attached "Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services" for more
information.
+� ALTERNATIVES
The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) may be awarded to another engineering
firm that submitted a proposal.
CEQA FINDINGS
The rehabilitation of Foster Pump Station (FPS) is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan
EIR. The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was
filed on October 29, 1999. A supplemental EIR will be processed to update the
Program EIR to reflect replacement of the FPS rather than the rehabilitation indicated in
the Strategic Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Budget Information Table
2. PSA Status Report (Black & Veatch)
3. PSA Status Report (Carollo Engineers)
4. Summary of Staff Evaluation of Proposals & Staff Recommendation
RW:jak:jo
H:1wp.dla%agenda%Board Agenda RepodsQDOO Board Agenda RepoAMOMOUIem Nq.doe
aee. Page 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX
JOB NO. J-77
1�+ ''h +DRIbIDIAI` t OttRiiEN�ltt' PRbP08ED 'PROhOSED a 'FttNdB + PRbPO$)_D l$ . f(IA7ED t ,
P111 OTRR$Ife ?I1 O ISB �y PRO��IE 't1*t 6U0'bETidl @4"r it E gb� r� „'AUTHORI�'ED :AUfiNO ATIOI) ,Tfjl'AL
a ,n: l of °. 1 Dbel' 41 M BUDd to kr ,tfniftEABE h'ed � ', +1 ^) 10 DATE" N AUTROItIZATM111
tA.!kt,
Project Development $ 370,000 $ 370,000 $ 320.000 $ 50.000 $ 370,000 $ 320.000 $ 50.000 $ 37,057 10%
Design Staff $ 1,861,000 $ 1.851,000 $ 1,851.000 $ - $ 1,851,000 $ 1,851,000
Consultant PSA' $ 4,676.000 $ 4.676,000 $ 2,433,210 $ 2,242,790 $ 33,980 $ 2208.810 $ 2,242,790 $ 33,980 2%
Construction Contract $ 19,077,000 $ 19,077,000 $ 19,077,000 $ $
Construction Other $ $
Construction Staff $ 2,170.000 $ 2,170,000 $ 2,170,000 $ $
Contin ency* I $ 56,000 1 $ 56,000 $ 2.753,210 $ 2.809,210 $
TOTAL 1 $ 28.200,000 1 $ 28,200,000 1 $ - $ 2B,200,000 1 $ 403,980 Is 3,739,810 $ 4,143,790 $ 71,037 2%
$33,980 authorized for Carollo Engineers--Preliminary Design Study
H: v, lalanBUOBS 4 CONTR CTSU.77 Effluent Pump Station AnnexlJ-77 Buget Table.xleiDisuicu,
KN Pd meneVonnatbudmn table
Fmm Wvteed MT96
a
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Effluent Pump Station Annex
Job No. J-77
Total Project Budget: $ 28,200,000
Consultant: Black & Veatch
Start Date of Project: May 25, 2000
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
Pending — Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 $2,208,810 $2,208,810
HAwp.otatengUOBS S CONTRACTSU-77 Effluent Pump Stal on AnnaxV 77-PSA Status Report doe 04/27/00
E - .
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Effluent Pump Station Annex
Job No. J-77
Total Project Budget: $ 33,980
Consultant: Carollo Engineers
Start Date of Project: August 16, 1999
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
8/16/99 — Effluent Pump Station, Job No. J-59 $24,980 $24,980
Preliminary Design Study/Report
11/22/99 Addendum Provide additional analysis and detailed cost $6,000 $33,980
#1 estimate to compare Foster Rehabilitation with
new Effluent Pump Station.
H:b p.dtabnpUOBS&CONTF ACTSU-77 Effluent Pump Station Annew-77-PSA 2-status Report.dw 04/27/00
ReVwd OVUM
w
EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX
JOB NO. J-77
Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services
The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals:
• Black & Veatch
• Brown and Caldwell
• Carollo Engineers
• Boyle Engineering
• CH2M HILL
• Malcolm Pirnie
• Montgomery Watson
Boyle, CH2M HILL, Malcolm Pimie, and Montgomery Watson opted to not submit
a proposal. The remaining three firms; Black & Veatch, Brown and Caldwell, and
Carollo submitted responsive proposals on April 10, 2000. Proposals were
reviewed in-house by a selected panel. Formal interviews were held with all
three responsive firms and the review panel on April 18, 2000. The review panel
consisted of six members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 It being
best) in six categories described below:
1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates
the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and
their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown.
2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work—Rates the team's project
management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the
tasks.
3. Applicable Related Project Experience—Rates the team's overall total
number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as
it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also
rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates
directly to the design and construction support for this project.
4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's
educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to
the Scope of Work for this project.
5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants —Addresses the
appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants
to consultant teams.
a
V
8. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs
and can the Consultant meet the schedule.
After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the
three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The
following summarizes the attached ranking results for the three firms:
Black & Veatch 2958 Points
• Brown and Caldwell 2437 Points
• Carollo Engineers 2806 Points
The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the
firms:
Black & Veatch
Collective scores placed Black&Veatch (B&V) as the first choice in the overall
rankings. Four of the six District panel members ranked B&V first in their
rankings. Two placed them second in their rankings.
District Staff were impressed with B&V's top in-house project management,
hydraulic specialist, overall project team, use of SPEC Services as
electrical/instrumentation subconsultant, document accessibility through
Cybemet document management system for all project team members, relative
large Pump Station experience, and excellently written and presented proposal.
Minor concerns included B&V's limited experience with the District staff and
policies. However, with the strengths listed above, the panel felt that their overall
approach would facilitate the design and subsequent construction of the Effluent
Pump Station Annex.
Brown and Caldwell
Overall panel ranking of Brown & Caldwell placed them third out of the three
proposals received. This Consultant did not offer an alternative to their technical
selection of a vertical can pumping system. The panel felt that by limiting their
"solution"to this one technology, they did not show much initiative or creativity in
providing the "best" solution to our specific project needs.
Carollo Engineers
Carollo placed second overall in the overall rankings by the District panel. Two
of the four panel members placed them first in their individual rankings.
However, the margin between Carollo and their second choice of B&V was
minimal.
4
The project team had a tough time after the initial interviews choosing either
Carollo or B&V as a dear frontrunner. Carollo's proposal and presentation were
well written and presented. Their project team and overall approach appeared
strong. However, questions were raised as to Carollo's perception of the
limitations of the scope. It was not clear in the first interview whether or not
operational "upgrades"to the existing COBS facility to provide seamless
interaction between COBS and this proposed EPS Annex were part of this
project. Upon further discussion, it was determined that their scope excluded
interaction with the OOBS facility other than to make recommendation(s)for
upgrades to be made under a subsequent project. Their level of effort proposed
for the instrumentation and control work was underestimated.
Summary
After initial interviews were concluded with the Consultants, Staff had additional
questions for both Black&Veatch and Carollo Engineers. The interview panel
met with each ffrm's representatives a second time. After completion of these
second round interviews, the panel collectively selected Black & Veatch team as
their first choice of the three responsive consultants.
After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed
fee proposals as submitted by the three candidates.
Carollo was the apparent low base fee proposal at $1,959,410. However, they
had provided "optional" services fees of an additional $250,000 for a total fee
proposal of$2,209,410. Black&Veatch provided an initial fee proposal of
$2,246,533. Brown & Caldwell's fees were the highest proposed at$2,435,000.
Both B&V and B&C proposals included the "optional"services that Carollo had
proposed as part of their total fees.
As Staff had selected Black&Veatch prior to opening of the fee proposals as
their consultant of choice, the nominal difference in cost between B&V and
Carollo (coupled with Carollo's scope limitation)was not great enough to warrant
a change in the panel's choice of Consultant. Therefore, the panel chose to
recommend award of the project to Black & Veatch at their original proposed fee.
Concurrently, the District chose to award another somewhat related District
project (J-71-1)to Black &Veatch. As Jim Clark is the Project Manager for both
of these projects, B&V reduced their proposed fee by$37,723 for this project to
account for any duplication in efforts between these two projects. The J-71-1
project fee was also reduced.
Therefore, the selection panel recommends the award of this project to Black &
Veatch for a total proposed fee of$2,208,810.
RW.,jak:jo
H-. vP.db%e VNJOBS&CONTRACTSV-A EfRuanl Pump Station AnnaxU-T7 Staff Ev Iuation.dw
TABLE 1.0
Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77
STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Firm Black & Veatch Brown and Caldwell Carollo Engineers
Reviewer A 499 493 522
Reviewer B 561 465 507
Reviewer C 462 314 454
Reviewer D 554 476 534
Reviewer E 515 428 543
Reviewer F 367 261 246
Total Score 2958 2437 2806
3480 Points Maximum
Average Score 493 406 468
580 Points Maximum
Workforce Estimate 16,519 20,525 17,202
Man-hours + 5,951 electlinstr sub
100% Design Completion Proposed 83 82 60
Weeks
Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $2.208,810 $2,435,000 $1,959,410
+ $250.000 "Options"
$2,209,410 Total Fee
c _
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 3
May 10, 2000
(7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Director of Finance Gary Streed reported that the District has again received an award for its
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and that Julie Matsamoto also received an award for
leading this effort.
As reported at last month's FAHR Committee meeting, the District's short-term portfolio holds
two FINOVA Capital notes ($475,000)which were downgraded to BBB+ on the last day of the
month. Both securities met the District's credit quality requirements when PIMCO purchased
them in October 1999, and January 2000. However, the current downgraded securities are
technically non-compliant with respect to credit quality. Staff has monitored and evaluated
PIMCO's position in these securities with both PIMCO and Callan Associates, the District's
investment advisor. Both firms recommend that the FINOVA securities continue to be held and
monitored, as the notes are due to mature in October(less than six months), and the District
would receive full payment of principal at maturity. The Committee members agreed with staffs
recommendation.
(8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources, reported that the first negotiating meeting with
the SPMT group is scheduled for Thursday, May 11, 2000. Additional details will be discussed in
closed session.
(10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that both Orange County and the City
of Huntington Beach have scheduled meetings to discuss the development of a media action
plan that will address beach closures for the summer.
Blake Anderson announced that Ms. Tuchman has submitted, and he has accepted with regret,
her resignation as Director of Communications. She will be leaving the District at the end of the
month to join Nelson Communications.
(10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff had no report.
(11) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-g)
a. FAHR00-32: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000.
b. FAHROD-33: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report.
C. FAHR00-34: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of May 1, 2000.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting v'
Page 4
May 10, 2000
d. FAHROD-35: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in
amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing
policies.
e. FAHR00-36: Recommend that the Board of Directors receive and file Quarterly
Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1,
2000 through March 31, 2000.
f. FAHR00-37: Recommend that the Board of Directors receive and file the Third
Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ending
March 31, 2000.
g. FAHROD-38: Recommend that the Board of Directors adopt Resolution
No. OCSD 00-_, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98.33,
Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions
for items specified as 11(a)through (g) under Consent Calendar.
(12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-g)
a. FAHR00-39: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Amending Resolution
No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies
Procedures Manual, providing for. (1) Create Accounting
Supervisor classification at pay range El ($60,828-$86,064); (2)
Create Human Resources Supervisor classification at pay range
El ($60,828-$86-064); (3) Create Lead Pump Power Operator at
pay range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883); and, (4) Change the title of
Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors. Director Gullixson opposed.
b. FAHROO-40: Direct staff to work with member agencies to evaluate the potential
to collect Capital Facilities Capacity Charges(CFCC) for high-
demand users in two phases: when building permits are issued,
and when tenant improvement permits are issued.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve.
C. FAHROO-41: Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities
Capacity Charge rate and structure until the Strategic Plan Capital
Improvement Program is modified.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
y Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 5
May 10, 2000
d. FAHROO-42: (1) Implement Sewer Service Charge rates for 2000-01 equal to
those previously adopted for Revenue Area 3. These rates will be
based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year and
the percentages adopted in Ordinance No. OCSD-05. Previously
adopted higher rates in other Revenue Areas may be implemented
as needed in the future; and,
(2) Implement previously adopted Sewer Service Charge rates in
Revenue Area 7. The base single-family residential rate will be
$73 per year.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors. Directors Gullixson and Leyes opposed.
e. FAHROO-43: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD Amending Table C of Ordinance
No. OCSD-06, Relating to Source Control Permit User Fees,
setting the rates for 2000-01.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors. Director Gullixson voted no.
I. FAHROO-44: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-_, Amending Table B of Ordinance
No. OCSD-05, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
g. FAHROO-45: Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total
contracts by$200,000, from $1,000,000 to$1,200,000 for
remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and approve funding in the amount
of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board
of Directors.
(13) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS
a. FAHROO-46: 2000-01 Budget Status
Controller Mike White presented the proposed 2000-01 Joint Operating Budget
and explained the changes. David Ludwin presented the proposed Capital
Improvement Program budget for the coming year. The final documents will be
presented to the FAHR Committee at its June meeting and submitted to the Board
for approval at its June 28 regular meeting.
b. FAHROO47: Update on COP Restructuring
Financial Manager Steve Kozak updated the members on the status and
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting �
Page 6
May 10, 2000
development of the approved two-phase financing plan to restructure and
modernize the District's existing COP long-term debt. He also reported that all
three municipal bond rating agencies, Moody's, S&P and Fitch, awarded "Aa"
category credit ratings to the District. This allows the District to move forward with
final structuring and issuance of the Series 2000 COPS, and with substitution of
modernized bond documents for the 1992 and 1993 COPS.
Mr. Kozak also reported that Director Swan had contacted staff and requested
that his support for issuing the Series 2000 Refunding COPS as variable rate debt,
and including the issuance of an additional $150 million reimbursement financing
piece with the Series 2000 Refunding COPS. Director Boyd expressed concern
about the competitive bidding process for underwriters. Staff will review its
practices and consider bidding all issues.
Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the report; to
recommend a financing of the $150 million reimbursement but as an issue
separate from the current refunding issue.
(14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 14, 2000 at 5 p.m.
(17) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported that the Committee would meet in Closed Session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider labor negotiations with Local 501
and SPMT Units.
The Committee convened in dosed session at 7:40 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda
Item No. 17(a)(1).
At 8:30 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
Page 7
May 10, 2000
(19) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jea appan
FA Committee Assistant Secretary
IYcb,WbiMp.MWmnl951�N9lLl5ILm Ov.4 FNfA MWOz
FAHR COMMITTEE MeeDngDdte I Toed.ofl)
05/10/00 1 05/24/0D
AGENDA REPORT h�eem Numbe ,tam Numbr
r P!l Nt UMW
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2000
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2000,
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional
external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian
bank for the investment program.
The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements
as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the
"Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The
District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of
the District's Investment Policy, The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase
agreements.
Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and
Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the
last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor
variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
%V dWM nll ,dWNn2labane`FAHRWahQ000% lTmasmafs Repml-Mey.dw
Re . MM Page i
i .
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
i
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term
investment portfolios forthe reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of
posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield
analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,
yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual
holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the
source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may
not be reflected.
These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with
California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy.
Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted
expenditures for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Amounts Apr0 30,2000 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAIF $ 29,921,844 6.0
Union Bank Checking Account 462,327 —
Union Bank Overnight Repumhase Agreement 7,883,000 5.4
PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 19,786,778 5.9
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 349,150,617 3.9
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,038 5.8
Debt Service Reserves Q Trustees 32,157,809 6.7
Petty Cash 8,000 —
TOTAL $439,372,413
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Report
%WdO WaUlW. dlMnVIO0 anoTAHRTah Wa MaavelS ReNd-Wy m
R..d: 6/M Page 2
Prepared by Finance, 0
ReportMonthly Treasurer's
District Fund Balances
$450,000,001
, , , , , , , , muimi muuui IIIIIIIIII
$350,000,000 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ����� iiiii-iiiii�
:�:�:•:�i :❖:•:�i i❖:❖i :�:;:;:;:; ❖:❖:•i ❖:❖:•i
Nov, 99
Dec, 99 Jan, 11 Feb, 11 Mar, 11 Apr, 11
s Debt Service Reserves EGLAIF
u
3 Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash
0 . GO Bond
MONTHLY REPORT ��-
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 April 1000)
Liquid Operating Mottles(603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $19,796,609
• Mellon $19,786,778
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO $19,813,174
• Mellon $19,812,946
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23
Of Index:
0.20
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $45,966
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 63%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": See Note
15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" See Note
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
I Month: 0.50 0.47
3 Months: 1.59 1.38
12 Months: 5.60 5.10
Year-to-Date: 2.04 1.82
Commentary
• Interest rates athe shorvend of the yield curve fell slightly in April(three-month T-Bills down 7 basis points to 5.81%),while the lonji posted increases.
• The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 3 basis points in April.
• PIMCO's emphats on commercial paper slightly enhanced resume.
• NOTE: On March 31",S&P downgraded Finvva Capital Corp.from A-to BBB+with a Stable Outlook,due to the parent company's(Finova Group,Inc.)announcement ofa special accounting chase to
comings. A Finova Capital Corporate Note,$475,000 par amount.6.375%coupon,maturing on October 15.2000,1s held in the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio. Thenotecomprisesabout2A%ofthe
newly$20 million portfolio. PIMCO's credit teem hm analysed the Finova credit and reported on April 27e: "Our credit seem is satisfied to a large degree th s there is not a systemic problem with the
Company's low book. Our recommendation is that we continue to hold this security."
x:t..vmexre_.wcvisco u0oaw wr
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7NVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 30 April 2000)
Lang-Term Operating Montes(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• PIMCO $349,252,256
• Mellon $349,150,617
Historical Cost: $351,492,689
• PIMCO $352,445,006
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.10
Of Index: 2.29
15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact( ain/loss)oft%Change: $7,402,254
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repot:
(gee attached schedule) O°A
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 37%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
n
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index
Period:
1 Month: 0.27 0.07
3 Months: 1.89 1.57
12 Months: 3.46 2.79
Year-to-Date: 1.90 1.34
Commentary
While short< d yields(one-year and less)fell slightly in March(three-month T-Bills down 7 basis points to 5.81%),yields on longer maturities incte°sed(fiveyear Tttasury Notes up 22 basis points W
6.54%),posting the U.S.Treasury market's Brst negative mW mtum of the year.
The Lons-Team portfolio outperformed in benchmark by 20 basis points In April.
PIMCO's decision to maintain a below index duration added to portfolio returns a rates reset.
PIMCO's emphasis on mortgage securities added to ttler"rcmms as mortgages outperformed all other sectors.
N.�...IFlHAM'.E\°Ial,.I efl'ISFD LIWW aPT
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE I
BASE. USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07511102 30-APR-2000 FINAL
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 7,663,330.50 2,663,350.50 13.33% 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 2,476,569.44 4476,569.44 12.39% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS TUN IYR 2,672,046.25 2,672,046.25 13.37% 0.00
FED RM LOAN BNE.-LESS THN IYR 1,791,76&00 1,791,768.00 8.97% 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 113,668.42 113,66&42 0.57% 0.00
TOTAL UNTIED STATES 9,717,402.61 9,717,402.61 48.63% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS �,7 M 9,7 , 02. 48.63% OW
FIRED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 3,493,457.03 3,496,315.00 17.45% 2,857.97
U.S.AGENCIES 999,200.00 1,000,000.00 5.00% 800.00
ADS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 900,738.00 4.51% -5,175.00
BANKING&FINANCE 1,670,528.50 1,665,982.00 8.34% 4,546.50
INDUSTRIAL 2,028,520.00 2,013,500.00 10.08% -15,020.00
UTILITY-GAS 495,945.00 496,275.00 2.49% 430.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 512,080.00 506,565.00 2.54% -5,515.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,095,543.53 10,069,375.00 50.39% -26,169.53
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 10,095,543.53 10,069,375.00 50.39%
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 195,881.05 195,881.05 0.99% 0.00
TOTAL 195,881.05 195,881.05 0.98% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 195,881.05 195$81.05 0.98% 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 20,009,927.19 19,982,658.66 I011.00% -26,168M
09-May2000 9.3S.14 E,,W,w Nanlbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-APR-2000 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
%OF UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH -1,049,225.94 -1,049,225.94 -0.30% 0.00
RECEIVABLES 10,422,001.91 10,422,001.91 2.96% 0.00
PAYABLES -46,243,762.42 .46,243,762.42 -13.12% 0.00
TOTAL -36,970,986.45 -36,870,986.45 -10.46% 0.00
UNITED STATES
COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 51,769,148.61 51,769,149.61 14.69% 0.00
FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 12,659,241.77 12,659,241.77 3.59% 0.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 64.428.390.38 64,428,390.38 18.29% 0.00
TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 27,557,403.93 27,557,403.93 7.82% 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
UNITED STATES
U.S.GOVERNMENTS 98,637,928.17 99,372,486.57 27.92% -265,441.60
U.S.AGENCIES 60,156,088.60 59,135,849.84 16.78% .1,020,238.76
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 35,227,462.99 34,996,869.15 9.93% -230,593.83
ONMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,432,290.48 3,391,990.45 0.96% 40,400.03
FHLMC POOLS 9,100,791.20 8,899,844.14 2.53% -200,947.06
FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,857,023.28 7,594,089.62 2.160/a -262.933.66
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 37,234.75 37,176.30 0.01% -58.45
ABS:HOME EQUITY 353,512.05 351,854.09 0.100/0 -1,657.97
OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 2,667,495.38 2,665,640.% 0.76% -1,844.42
MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 986,720.00 0.28% .13,280.00
BANKING&FINANCE 76,398,260.81 75,896,334.43 21.54% -501,926.38
INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,786,344.35 1.93% -339,844.65
UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,096,090.00 7,883,680.00 2.24% -212,400.00
UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,294,233.00 2.07% -5,767.00
UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,300,200.00 2.07% -197,055.00
TOTAL UNITED STATES 324,887,601.70 321,593,212.89 91.27% -3,294,388.81
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 324,887,601.70 32 1,593,212.89 91.27% -3�294,399.8I
09-Map2000 9:38:10 Executive Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2
BASE: USD
NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY
OCSF07522202 30-APR-2000 FINAL
LONG TERM OPER-PLMCO
% UNREALIZED
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,205,885.89 3,205,995.89 0.91% 0.00
TOTAL 3,205,885.89 3,205,895.89 0.91% 0.00
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,205,885.89 3,205,89: $ 0.91% 0.06
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 355,650,891.52 352,356,502.71 100.00% -3,294,388.81
09-May-1000 9:38.l0 Emcuftw Wm*bemh
YI.DANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t I
OCSF03511302 2000/04/30 RON DATE t 05/04/00
DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RON TINE , 13.12.55
PAN VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARXET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HARNEY VALUE E TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
113,668.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE NGHT .000 5.353 AAA 100.000 113,668.42 1.16
996085247 AAA 113,669.42 .57
2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.092 .000 P-1 98.947 2,077,894.58 21.38
31358OWSO HAT 05/11/2000 A-1+ 2,077,894.58 10.50
1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR CONS DISC N 5.907 .000 P-1 99.543 1,791,768.00 10.43
313384XFI HAT 05/24/2000 A-1+ 1,791,768.00 9.06
900,000.00 GOLDHAN SACHS GROUP L P DISC 6.008 .000 P-1 98.699 880,200.25 9.14
38142TE04 05/24/2000 088,288.25 4.49
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN RIG CORP DISC 6.082 .000 P-1 99.D63 2,476,569.44 25.48
313396YJ6 HAT 06/20/200D A-l♦ 2,476,569.44 12.52
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.109 .000 P-1 98.710 888,392.25 9.14
36959HPU6 06/28/2000 888,392.25 4.49
600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIG ASSN DISC NTS 6.210 .000 P-1 99.025 594,151.67 6.11
3135BOYDI HAT 06/15/99 A-1+ 594,151.67 3.00
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 6.293 .000 P-1 98.519 006,670.00 9.12
63743CG56 07/05/2000 006,670.00 4.40
________ _______ _________________ _________
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.957 .107 9,717,402.61 100.00
9,717,402.61 49.11
FIXED INCURS SECURITIES
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN HIG CORD DEES .000 4.705 AAA 100.000 999,200.00 9.93
3134A3RT5 PUTS AT 05/16/2000 DD 05/18/99 AAA 1,000,000.00 5.05
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.112 5.145 AAA 99.609 3,493,457.03 34.62
9120274Q2 05.1258 00/31/2000 DO 08/31/90 AAA 3,486,315.00 13.62
475,000.00 ASSOC IATE3 CORP NORTH AMER 6.296 6.006 AA3 99.895 474,273.25 4.71
046003EL9 6.000% 06/15/2000 A+ 474,501.25 2.40
900,000.00 FOND HIS CR HIN 4 TR 00538 6.312 7.014 A2 100.O82 905,913.00 8.94
345402YKI 3.020% 10/10/2000 DO 10/10/95 A 900,738.00 4.55
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2
MSF07511102 2000/04/30 RUN DATE , 05/04/00
DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
400,000.00 LERMAN BROS NLDGS MTN TR 00252 6.353 6.416 A3 99.745 400,216.00 3.96
52510PLMI 6.400% O9/30/200D DO 09/26/97 A 398,980.00 2.02
900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORD NTS 6.425 9.458 A2 101.339 922,860.00 9.05
370442ANB 9.625% 12/01/2000 DD 12/01/90 A 912,051.00 4.61
150,000.00 MORGAN G P 6 CO MTN SR 00043 6.430 6.146 Al 99.656 149,625.00 1.40
61687YBU0 6.125% 10/02/2000 DO 10/02/97 AA 149,484.00 .36
600,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 6.534 6.502 A3 99.964 599,760.00 5.95
812404MI 6.500% 06/15/2000 OD O6/13/95 A- 599,784.00 3.03
SOOoOOO.00 BURLINGTON ME INC NT 6.538 9.593 A3 100.333 505,900.00 4.98
122014AB9 9.625% 06/15/2000 DO 06/28/90 A- 501,665.00 2.54
500,000.00 GTE CORD DEB 6.669 9.254 BAA1 1U1.313 512,080.00 5.03
362320A06 9.335% 12/01/200D A 506,565.00 2.56
475,000.00 FIRMA CAP CORD 6.820 6.441 BAA1 98.969 473,031.25 4.66
318024AF8 6.305% 30/15/2U00 DO 10/11/95 BBB. 470,102.75 2.38
175,000.00 CIT GROUP SLUGS MTV 0 SR 00010 6.862 5.693 Al 98.808 173,303.00 1.01
12560QAK5 5.6258 02/02/2001 DO 02/02/96 A. 112,914.00 .87
500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 4TR OD006 6.999 6.216 A3 99.255 495,045.00 4.92
90269QAF6 6.170% 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/90 A- 496,275.00 2.51
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.332 6.019 10,095,543.53 100.00
10,069,375.00 50.90
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 5.533 4.060 19,812,946.14 100.00
19,786,000.61 100.00
a
m
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OcSr07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00
DISTRICT: LOHG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RABBET TDTAL COST/ 8 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00
996085247 AAA .00 .00
5,900,ODO.00 FEDERAL NATL RIG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.859 .000 P-1 99,001 5,041,065.55 9.06
313588NA3 NATURES 05/04/2000 A-1♦ 5,841,065.55 1.51
7,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.009 .000 P-1 90.682 6,907,055.56 10.72
36959HER9 05/19/2000 6,902,255.56 1.09
4,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISC NTS 6.029 .000 P-1 98.858 4,349,737.33 6.35
313588YD1 NAT 06/15/99 A-1+ 4,349,737.33 1.13
2,700,000.00 EASTHAN RODAA CO DISC 6.041 .000 P-1 98.823 2,668,209.75 4.14
22746AEJ4 05/18/2000 2,668,209.75 .69
600,000.00 USAA CAP CORD DISC 6.054 .000 P-1 99.607 591,642.00 .91
90328AF65 06/06/2000 591,642.00 .15
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DISCOUNT 6.056 .000 P-1 98.338 2,468,438.89 3.03
313588YL3 HAT 06122/200D A-1+ 2,468,438.89 .64
5,300,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 6.070 .000 P-1 99.043 5,249,482.17 8.14
02225AEC2 05/12/2000 5,249,482.17 1.36
4,7OO,000.DO USAA CAP CORP DISC 6.086 .000 P-1 99.079 4,656,701.25 3.22
90328AEF6 05/15/2000 4,656,701.25 1.21
3,300,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 6.OB6 .000 P-1 98.913 3,264,130.83 5.06
74231RFE2 06/14/2000 3,264,130.03 .85
3,500,ODO.DO BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.082 .000 P-1 99.062 7,429,650.00 11.53
O1588RF26 06/02/2000 7,429,650.00 1.92
5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 6.100 .000 P-1 99.177 5,157,179.44 8.00
00SOOMNI 05/22/2000 5,157,179.44 1.34
10,400,000.00 HEINS R J CO DISC 6.101 .000 P-I 99.160 10,312,611.11 16.00
42307JF62 06/06/2000 10,312,612.11 2.69
400,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 6.153 .000 P-1 98.584 394,334.61 .61
61166AFE4 06/14/2000 394,334.67 .10
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 4
OCSF07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE S 05/04/00
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME S 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARRY VALUE % TOTAL
5,200,000.00 GNAC DISC 6.261 .000 P-1 98.393 5,137,451.03 3.97
37042DFU2 06/20/2000 5,137,451.83 1.33
________ _______ _________________ ---------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.024 .000 64,428,390.30 100.00
64,428,390.39 16.69
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS IN HE CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.736 Al 100.339 1,992,000.00 .62
066365DN4 FLED RT D5/1112003 DD 05/11/90 A- 2,006,79O.DO .52
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC NTN #TR00615 .000 6.143 Al 100.015 3,498,635.00 1.08
171200EBO FLTG AT O8/09/2002 DO 04/08/98 A. 3,500,525.00 .91
3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEER .000 6.179 Al 100.043 2,994,300.00 .93
2D9111CU5 FLED RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 3,001,290.00 .78
330,573.95 FULMC GROUP #78-6064 .ODD 6.443 AAA 99.016 322,516.21 .10
31348SNK3 6.3841 01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA 327,321.10 .08
2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL ME .000 6.242 A2 99.303 1,992,580.00 .62
345397RV FITS RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/90 A 1,994,060.00 .52
2,000,000.DO FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 6.215 A2 99.921 1,990,613.60 .62
345397WB FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 A 1,999,420.00 .52
3,000,OOD.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL LAN GHANA .000 6.362 A2 99.812 3,OOD,000.00 .93
345397SRS FLTG RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,994,360.00 .DB
3,ODO,000.00 GMAC MIN FLTG RT .000 6.523 A2 100.312 3,010,830.00 .93
32042NVR9 12/17/2001 DD 12/15/98 A 3,009,36D.DD .38
3,000,000.00 GENERAL MEN ACCEP 4TR 00562 .000 6.270 A2 99.828 2,996,43D.OD .93
37042WZKO FLTG AT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 2,994,84D.00 .38
3,950,000.00 GNAC ME FLIG RT .000 5.560 A2 10D.132 3,918,768.50 1.22
30042SOVS 08/18/2003 DO O0/17/98 A 3,955,214.00 1.02
2,702,019.71 GNHA DID REMIC TR 2000-9 FR .000 6.403 AAA 98.642 2,702,019.71 .82
3633H4NX9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,665,326.29 .69
2,000,0OO.OD HELLER FINANCIAL INC ME .000 6.487 A3 100.314 2,000,000.00 .62
423328BX8 MEG RT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/99 A- 2,006,280.00 .52
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSM7522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE 05/04/00
DISTRICT: SANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ R TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTN OTR 00246 .000 6.338 A3 99.406 3,000,000.00 .92
42333BLFI FLTG AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/27/99 A- 2,982,180.00 .II
4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO HTN .000 6.390 A2 100.663 4,000,000.00 1.25
44191KEAS FLTG AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 A 4,026,520.00 1.04
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 000520 .000 5.322 A2 100.3I5 999,190.90 .31
44181M8T4 FLTG AT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,003.I50.00 .26
2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00333 .000 7.127 A3 100.879 2,322,379.00 .02
52517PPWS FLTG AT 04/01/2D02 DO 03/29/99 A 2,320,217.00 .60
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS SLOGS MTN .000 6.666 A3 100.109 5,000,000.00 1.55
52517PQQ3 FLTG AT 12/12/2002 DO 12/07/99 A 5,005,450.00 1.30
1.700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN 4TR 00311 .000 6.166 AA3 99.984 1,699,517.20 .52
61745ENY3 FLTG AT 01/28/2002 DO O1127100 A4 1,699.320.00 .44
I.000,000.00 OLD SENT BM MTN SB 00001 .000 3.084 100.000 7,000,000.00 2.17
6I982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 1,DDD,DOO.00 1.81
3.300,000.00 CHECK INC NEW HT .000 6.966 A2 99.921 7,300,000.00 2.26
682680102 FLTG AT 04/24/2D02 DO 04/24/00 A 7.294,233.00 1.89
2,673,220.65 STUDENT IN NEW ASSN 98-2 Al .000 6.006 AAA 99.716 2,667,485.38 .82
I8442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 AAA 2,665,640.96 .69
8,686,998.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.702 3.632 AAA 99.797 8.65].5]8.19 2.69
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 AAA 8,669,363.39 2.25
24,630,470.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.029 3.503 AAA 95.344 23,793,646.16 7.37
9129212M3 3.3758 01115/2DOI DD 01/15/97 AAA 23.329,980.02 6.15
1,008,450.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 4.337 4.162 AAA 102.125 1,001,370.00 .32
9128275WO 4.2508001/15/2010 DO 01/15/00 AAA 1,029,879.56 .23
1,950.I19.40 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY SLOGS IMF 4.696 3.709 RAI 98.405 1,816,818.61 .56
79549BMI 3.650% 02/14/2002 DD D2/14/97 A 1,821,200.43 .47
4.GOD.000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN IM 00299 5.170 5.467 RAI 99.875 3,997,780.00 1.24
61745ENLI FLTG RT 04/15/2002 DO 04/15/99 Af 3,995,000.00 1.03
2.100.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.405 AAA 99.531 2,167,321.15 .64
912823854 D6.3354 09/3D/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,090,151.00 .54
YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 6
O SM7522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIM t 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARIRT VALUE 6 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR SYS 5.650 6.643 AA3 97.043 1,543,215.00 .45
046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DD 07/11/97 A- 1,467,645.00 .38
11000,000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.I60 5.095 A3 93.548 999,730.00 .30
42333HEJO 5.7501 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/99 A- 015,480.00 .25
2,005,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HTN 5.604 6.364 A3 96.687 2,060,739.00 .60
812400GM6 6.5401 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 A- 1,938,574.35 .50
23,430,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.807 5.303 AAA 90.562 23,351,209.95 7.18
912027501 05.625% 09/30/2001 DD 09/30/11 AAA 23,093,076.60 5.98
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.011 6.299 AAA 99.219 5,096,4D2.25 1.54
9128222L5 06.250E 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 AAA 4,960,950.00 1.29
3,000,000.00 SEARS RORBUCN ACCEP CORP MTN 5.049 6.803 A3 97.453 3,O73,170.00 .90
B12400JAI 6.6301 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 2,923,590.00 .76
421,531.00 FSLMC MULTICL HTG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.933 99.437 420,939.01 .13
3133T02D5 5.900E 06/15/2017 419,150.59 .11
25,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSM ME 5.991 5.900 AAA 9B.516 14,955,300.00 4.59
31364G2V0 5.8201 07/19/2001 DD 07/19/99 AAA 14,III,400.00 3.03
2,500,000.00 NERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.463 AA3 90.630 2,526,725.00 .06
59018SXP4 6.3751 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 AA- 2,465,925.00 .64
7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.164 AA2 97.336 7,497,255.00 2.27
079067MS 6.000E 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 ARA 7,300,200.00 1.89
12,500,000.00 PTDENAL HOHB LH HTG CORD DEES 6.062 6.061 AAA 99.000 12,405,625.00 3.B4
3134A32M1 6.0001 0I/20/2DOI DD 07/20/99 AAA 12,375,000.00 3.21
2,OOO,OOO.00 SANRBOSTON CORP SR SYS 6.133 6.286 A2 97.436 11999,600.00 .60
06605TAL6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,948,720.00 .50
37,234.76 FIFTH THIRD BE AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.210 AAA 99.843 37,234.75 .01
31633EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 3I,3I6.30 .01
1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC HTH BTR 00004 6.201 6.283 A3 98.632 1,000,000.00 .30
73317PAD1 6.200% 04/30/2001 DD 04/21/99 BBB. 906,720.00 .26
2,443,550.75 PHUNC HULTICLASS CTF 2146 OT 6.20I 6.202 AAA 96.750 2,400,414.67 .73
3133TNRU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 AAA 2,364,143.09 .61
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I
OCSF07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/04/00
DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMC 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE NARRET VALUE 6 TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________
353,512.D5 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 6.290 6.320 AAA 99.531 3S3,S12.05 .10
3935052Y3 6.2906 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/99 AAA 351,054.08 .09
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MIN 6.291 6.329 AAA 99.453 4,488,I05.00 1.33
31364CZV5 6.230% 03/01/2D02 DO 03/03/97 AAA 4,430,385.00 1.15
3,031,466.18 FRLMC MILTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.339 AAA 96.192 3,034,761.60 .90
3133ME95 VAR AT 00/15/2032 AAA 2,916,027.95 .76
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.929 A2 93.411 2,031,960.00 .60
073902MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 1,948,220.00 .SO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN GNMA I SF 6.371 6.606 AAA 90.793 5,755,059.38 1.76
OIN0606SO 6.000% 05/15/2029 AAA 5,674,012.50 1.47
2,000,000.00 PNLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.961 AAA 94.730 2,000,888.00 .58
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2010 AAA 1,094,760.00 .49
11,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN GNMA II ARM 6.501 6.559 AAA 99.094 11,13I,1U9.38 3.46
16HO62651 6.500% 05/20/2030 AAA 11,140,075.00 2.09
2,422,538.43 FNLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.523 7.291 AAA 82.295 2,266,399.49 .61
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 1,993,619.04 .52
21,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.603 6.514 AAA 99.281 21,276,109.37 6.63
912027Z62 06.500% 10/15/2006 DO 10/15/96 AAA 21,353,134.OD 5.53
5,000,000.00 SALONON 6B RIDGE NTN 6.625 6.625 AA3 100.000 5,000,000.00 1.55
7954SEEES FLTG RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 5,000,000.00 1.30
0,643,224.62 FRLMC GROUP 405-0476 6.628 3.050 AAA 99.182 8,330,274.99 2.66
312ODDQSS 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 8,572,523.04 2.22
1,931,053.73 GNMA II POOL 4080088N 6.705 6.329 AAA 100.734 1,973,295.53 .60
36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 UD 06/01/97 AAA 2,945,227.66 .50
10,500,000.00 FEDERAL MOW LN RIG CORP DEW 6.711 6.556 AAA 96.094 10,323,075.00 3.13
3134A3TC0 6.300% 06/01/2004 DO 06/02/99 AAA 10,099,970.00 2.61
2,000,000.00 RARER 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.086 A2 96.209 1,992,280.00 .59
531748A08 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 1,924,190.00 .50
3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CN CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.969 A2 96.172 2,995,D80.00 .89
345397SJS 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 A+ 2,885,160.00 .75
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8
OCSP07522202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE S 05/0410D
DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 1 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL
900,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BE CONS BDS 6.777 6.789 AAA 99.422 099,550.00 .27
3133MAQJ1 6.750E 02/01/2002 DO 02/01/00 AAA 894,798.00 .23
2,500,OOD.00 COUNTRYWIDE ROM LNS INC NT 6.866 7.165 A3 95.604 2,498,400.00 .74
22237UMS 6.850E 06/15/2004 DO O6/24/99 A 2,390,100.00 .62
21,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 6.985 6.937 AAA 93.703 20,367,968.75 6.26
OIN062656 6.500E 05/15/2030 AAA 20,146,171.80 5.22
1,435,224.05 GNRA II POOL 40080023 6.992 7.069 AAA 200.797 1,450,994.95 .44
36225CAE9 7.125E 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,446,662.79 .37
2,000,000.00 GNNA GIG REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 7.075 AAA 98.944 1,996,075.00 .61
3937N3C70 7.ODOE 12/20/2022 AAA 1,978,880.00 .51
2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASSN DENS 7.113 6.945 AAA 95.391 2,030,133.00 .62
31359MEYS 6.625E 09/15/2D09 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,003,211.00 .52
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF HIS 7.262 7.904 ASK 100.203 2,823,125.00 .62
OIN080658 8.000E 05/15/2030 RAN 2,004,060.00 .52
2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.635 BAA3 94.961 2,151,250.OD .SR
542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD D3/28/93 A- 1,899,220.00 .49
1,337,791.05 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FRA 995-7 9.564 7.540 AAA 98.539 1,298,538.95 .40
398109AE4 7.430E O6/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 1,290,538.95 .34
I,ODO,DOO.00 FORD MOTOR CA CO NT 7.582 7.062 A2 95.576 965,170.00 .29
345397GV9 6.750E 05/15/2005 A 955,760.00 .25
975,189.95 WNP/MUNTOON PAIGE 0000-1I150 7.684 7.667 AAA 97.828 954,009.07 .29
302998GE3 7.500E 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 954,009.07 .25
3,000,OD0.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN CTR 00115 7.709 7.341 A2 99.439 2,950,530.OD .92
69512BRUS 7.300E 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 2,983,170.00 .77
9,600,OOO.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 7.966 8.925 AAA 140.062 13,314,211.20 4.18
912RIDDL9 12.500E O0/15/2014 DO O8/15/84 AAA 13,445,952.00 3.48
1,600,000.OD ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 8.253 Al 96.590 1,594,032.00 .48
020002AL5 7.875E OS/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,545,440.00 .40
288,590.00 GNMA POOL #0479288 7.968 7.971 AAA 100.359 209,627.12 .09
36209MDI 8.000E 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/OD AAA 289,627.12 .00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9
MSPOIS22202 2000/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/04/00
DIETRICTf LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 1 13.12.55
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY HARNET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARRET VALUE S TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -- ----------
338,310.00 GNMA FCOL #0479289 7.966 7.971 AAA 100.359 339,525.80 .10
36209RNE9 8.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 339,525.80 .09
335,990.00 GNNA POOL #0522128 7.960 7.971 AAA IDO.359 337,197.46 .10
3621LU54 0.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 337,197.46 .09
404,685.00 GNNA POOL #0524743 7.968 7.905 AAA 100.187 406,139.34 .12
36211VSCO B.0008 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 405,441.76 .11
325,600.00 GNNA POOL #0528728 7.969 7.571 AAA 100.359 326,770.13 .10
362128LR4 0.000% 04/15/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 326,770.13 .09
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCONE SECURITIES 3.007 5.954 324,987,601.70 IDD.DD
321,593,212.89 03.33
-- ---- ------- ----------- ---------
TOTAL 3.907 5.739 389,315,992.08 100.00
386,021,603.27 100.00
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000 -30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINB.OSS
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 MAR WIRE FEES 05-Apr-2000 -5.95
NA9123459 0.00
CW 05-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 MAR WIRE FEES 05-Apr-2000 -11.05
NA9123459 0.00
C W 05-Apr-2000 0.00
PURCHASES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 03-Apr-2000 -5,157,179.44
0758BRENI 0522r2000 03-Apr-2000 5,157,179.44
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 03-Apr-2000 5,157,179.44
07588RENi 0522/2000 03-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
247.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 -247.13
9%085247 04-Apr-2000 247.13
B 0.00
09-May-1000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 2
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETEL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINBAWS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
247.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 -247.13
9%085247 04-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 04-Apr-20D0 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Apr.2000 -800,000.00
9936SA600 05.950%04/05/2000 DD 04/041 04-Apr-2000 800,000.00
B LEHMAN BROS ING NEW YORK 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Apr-2000 -800,000.0D
99368A600 05.950%04/052000 DO 04/0// 04-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 04-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,209.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr.2000 -8,209.50
996095247 05-Apr-2000 8,209.50
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,209.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 -8,209.50
996095247 05-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 05-Apr-2000 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
227,673.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Apr-2000 -227,673.78
996085247 07-Apr-2000 227,673.78
B 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
227,673.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Apr-2000 -227,673.79
996085247 07-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 07-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8.53:59 Executive lyorkbe h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3
PORTFOLIO DETAQ,
OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Apr-2000 -4,349,737.33
313588YD1 MAT 06/15199 07-Apr-2000 4,349,73733
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,400,OW.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Apr-2000 4,349,737.33
313588YDI MAT06/IS/99 07-Apr-2000 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 07-Apr-2000 0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Apr-2000 -2,468,438.89
313588YL3 MAT 061MODO 07-Apr-2000 2,468,438.89
B HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Apr-2000 -2,468,438.89
313588YL3 MAT 06/=000 07-Apr-20W 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC.NEW YORK 07-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,500,000.W BECTON DICKINSON DISC 07-Apr-2000 -7,429,650.00
07588RF26 06/022000 07-Apr-2000 7,429,650.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,500,000.00 BECfON DICKINSON DISC 07-Apr-2000 -7,429,650.00
07588RF26 0607J20W 07-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
44,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-2000 -44,920.00
996085247 10-Apr-2000 44,920.00
B 0.00
09-May-20W 8:53:59 Fs cuff a Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS600010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
44,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr.2000 44,920.00
996085247 10-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 10-Apr-2000 -886,670.00
63743CG56 07/052000 10-Apr-2000 886,670.00
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURALDISC 10-Apr.2000 -886,670.00
63743CG56 07/052000 10-Apr.2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 10-Apr-2000 -3,264,130.83
74271RFE2 06/142000 10-Apr-2000 3,264,130.83
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,300,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE DISC 10-Apr-2000 -3,264,130.83
74271RFE2 06/142000 10-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
11,607.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2000 -11,607.75
996085247 12-Apr-2000 11,607.75
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
11,607.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2000 -11,607.75
996085247 12-Apr.2000 0.00
FC 12-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Moy-1000 8.53:59 &s curiw tf'wkb..4
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEr COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Apr-2000 -899.392.25
36959HFU6 06282000 12-Apr-2000 $88,392.25
B GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12-Apr-2000 498,392.25
36959HFU6 062Y1000 12-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPTIAL COR 12-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,407.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Apr.2000 -12,407.72
996085247 13-Apr-2000 12,407.72
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
I2,407.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Apr-2000 -12,407.72
996085247 13-Apr-2000 OAO
FC 13-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,907.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2000 -1,807.60
996095247 14-Apr-2000 1,807.60
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,807.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2000 -1,307.60
996085247 14-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 14-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
15,14063 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -15,140.63
996085247 17-Apr-2000 15,140.63
B 0.00
09-My-2000 8:53:59 Ewcurim w&4Uwh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OcsG0ool0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
15,140.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -15,140.63
996085247 17-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,181,503.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -1,181,503.67
996085247 17-Apr-2000 1,181,503.67
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,181,503.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2000 -1,181,503.67
996085247 17-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,785.29 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Apr-2000 -7,785.29
996087094 17-Apr-2000 7,785,29
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,400,000.00 HEINZ H 1 CO DISC 17-Apr-2000 -10,312,611.11
42,307JF62 06/062000 17-Apr-2000 10,312,611.11
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,400,000.00 HEINZ H 1 CO DISC 17-Apr-2000 -10,312,611.11
42307JF62 06/062000 17-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 -3,655,156.00
37042DFU2 06282000 17-Apr-2000 3,655,156.00
B GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE,D 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Eremim Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOGDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 17-Apo-2000 -3,655,156.00
37042DFU2 0628200D 17-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE,D 17-Apr-2000 0.D0
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
73,806.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apo-2000 -73.806.49
996085247 18-Apr2000 73,806.49
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
73,806.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-200D -73,8D6.49
996095247 18-Apr-200D 0.00
FC 18-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N I8-Apr-2000 -594,131.67
313599YDI MAT 06/15/99 18-Apr-2000 594,151.67
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISC N 18-Apr.2000 -594,ISI.67
31359SYDI MAT 06t15N9 18-Apr-2000 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES NEW YORK 18-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
I,500,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 19-Apr-2000 -1,482,295.83
37042DFU2 06/282000 19-Apr-2000 1,482,295.83
B GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 GENERAL MTRS CORP DISC 19-Apr-2000 -1,482.295.93
37042DFU2 06282000 19-Apr.2000 0.00
FC GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CO 19-Apr-2000 0.00
09-M,0,2000 8:53:59 Executive Wmkbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 8
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,666.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 20-Apr-2000 -11,666.41
996097094 20-Apr-2000 11,666.41
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 20-Apr-2000 .2,100,000.00
99369PS81 05-770%04242000 DD 04120/ 20-Apr-2000 2,100,000.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 20-Apr-2000 -2,100,000.00
99368P581 05.770%0424/2000 DO 04/20/ 20-Apr-2000 0.00
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Apr.2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
510.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 -510.22
996095247 24-Apr-2000 510.22
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
510.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 -510.22
996095247 24-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 24-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 -3,199,489.78
313384WA3 MAT 04252000 24-Apr-200 3,199,499.78
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 -3,199,489.79
313384WA3 MAT04252000 24-Apr-2000 0.00
- PC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 24-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Ereom4ve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 9
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
249,578.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 -249,578.83
996095247 25-Apr-2000 249,578.83
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
48,064.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03
996085247 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03
B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
249,579.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 -249,579.83
996095247 25-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
48,064.03 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2000 48,064.03
996085247 25-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 -2,476,569.44
313396Y16 MAT 06/20/2000 25-Apr-2000 2,476,569.44
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 -2,476,569.44
313396Y16 MAT 0620/2000 25-Apr-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00
313384WBI MAT 04/26/2000 25-Apr-2000 1,799,714.00
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
09-M4y2000 8:53:59 Fsecudw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 10
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00
313384WRI MAT 04/26CM 25-Apr.2000 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PBNCO
8,232.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2000 .8,232.00
996085247 26-Apr-2000 9,232.00
B 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
8,232.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2000 .8,232.00
996085247 26-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 26-Apr.2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 -1,791,768.00
313384XFI MAT 05242000 26-Apr-2000 1,791,768.00
B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr.2000 -1,791,768.00
313384XF1 MAT 05242000 26-Apr.2000 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 26-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,665.10 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 27-Apr-2000 -6,665.10
996087094 27-Apr.2000 6,665.10
B 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 15-Feb-2000 1,302,163.94
398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 03-Mer-2000 -1,302,163.94
BC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
09-Mrry-2000 8:53:59 Emcuriw Wwkbexh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.' ;I
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG60010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 545.47
39810NAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00
IBC 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 1,302,709.41
39810NAE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00
FCC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 03-Mar-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 15-Feb-2000 -1,300,357.09
39810NAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/2910 03-Mar-2000 1,300,357.09
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 -544.72
39810NAE4 7.4300/.06/012003 DO 022910 03-Mar-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,319,636.15 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA N95 15-Feb-2000 -1,300,901.81
39810NAE4 7.4309/o 06(012003 DO 0229/0 03-Mar-2000 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 14-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Mu-2000 -10,240,312.50
OIN062649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2000 -9,774,943.75
OING62649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Maj4 90 8:53:39 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 12
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-My-2000 -5,662,109.38
OIN060643 6.000%04/15/2029 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
600.000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 29-Mu-2000 -611,460.00
812404AEI 6.500%06/152000 DO 06113/9 03-Apr-2000 0.00
FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 29-Mar-2000 2,007,187.50
OINOB0641 8.000%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 .2,007,187.50
BC SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
404,685.00 GNMA POOL80524743 29-M"-2000 ,406,139.34
36211V5CO 8.000°h04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 406,139.34
B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
404,685.00 GNMA POOL80524743 29-MV-2000 -1,618.74
36211 V5CO 8.000%04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
404,685.00 GNMA POOLM0524743 29-Mar-2000 407,758.08
3621IV5CO 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
325,600.00 GNMA POOL 80528728 29-Mar-2000 -326,770.13
36212BLH4 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/011 19-Apr-2000 326,770.13
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
09-May2000 8:53:59 Ecacuti.WorkbcrrcA
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
325,600.00 GNMA POOL#0528728 29-Mar-2000 -1,302.40
36212BLH4 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
1B 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
325,600.00 GNMA POOLW0528728 29-Mu-2000 -328,072.53
36212BLH4 8.0000/o04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
338,310.00 GNMA POOL80479289 29-Mar-2000 -339,525.80
36209RNE9 8.000%04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 339,525.80
B- SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
338,310.00 GNMA POOL#0479289 29-Mar-2000 -1,353.24
36209RNE9 8.0001.04/15/2030 DO 04101/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
338.310.00 GNMA POOL 80479289 29-Mar-2000 -340,879.04
36209RNE9 8.000%04/152030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
335,990.00 GNMA POOLA0522128 29-Mar-2000 -337,197.46
3621 ITA54 8.000%04/152030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 337,197.46
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
335,990.00 GNMA POOLp0522128 29-Mar-2000 -1,343.96
3621 ITA54 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
09-Map2100 8:53:59 Eaecudve Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
335,990.00 GNMA POOL#0522129 29-Mar-2000 -338,541.42
36211 TA54 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 04/01/ 19-Apr.2000 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
289,590.00 GNMA POOL80479288 29-Mar-2000 -289,627.12
36209PNDI 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 289,627.12
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
298,590.00 GNMA POOL80479288 29-Mar-2000 .1,154.36
36209RNDI 8.000°/a 04/15/2030 DD 04/011 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
288,590.00 GNMA POOL#0479288 29-Mer-2000 -290,781.48
36209RNDI 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
306,625.00 GNMA POOL 80499734 29-Mer-2000 -307,726.93
36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030DD04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 307,726.93
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 29-Mar-2000 -1,226.50
36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
306,625.00 GNMA PGOL 80499734 29-Mar-2000 -308,953.43
36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030 DO 041011 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Moy-2000 8.53:59 Erecuriw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 15
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 31-Mar-2000 -991,420.00
345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 05-Apr-2000 0.00
FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,843,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 05-Apr-2000 -1,909,535.31
79549BB01 3.650%02114/2002 DO 02/141 10-Apr-2000 1,809,535.31
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,343,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 05-Apr-2000 -10,466.62
79549BBGI 3.650°A02/142002 DD 02/14/ 10-Apr-2000 0.00
111 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,843,436.10 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 05-Apr-2000 -1,820,001.93
79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 10-Apr-2000 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -3,082,64529
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 3,082,645.29
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -25,813.59
9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/ 11-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,200,670.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -3,108,463.89
9128272M3 3,375%01/152007 DO 011151 1I-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I I-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Map2000 8.53:59 &ecutim Wo kbeac6
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 16
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,133,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr-2000 -2,053.763.24
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 1I-Apr-2000 2,053,763.24
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,133,790.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 10-Apr.2000 -17,212.40
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 0.00
IB D.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,133,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX IO-Apr-2000 -2,070,975.64
9128272M3 3.375%0111 5/2 0 0 7 DO 011151 11-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 11-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr-2000 -2,950,530.00
69512EEU5 7.300%1022/2004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 2,950,530.00
B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr.2000 -25,549.99
69512EEU5 7.300%10222004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN NTR 0011 10-Apr-2000 -2,976,079.99
69512EEU5 7.300%101=004 DO 1022/9 13-Apr-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 13-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO
10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 .9,945,469.75
OIN062656 6.500%051152030 22-May-2000 9,945,468.75
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00
09-McP-2000 8.53:59 aec fm W kbe.h
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: l7
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 -10,422,500.00
OIN062656 6.500%05/15/2030 22-May-2000 10,422,500.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 13-Apr-2000 -2,023,125.00
OINOS0658 8.0000/005/15/2030 22-May-2000 2,023,125.00
B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA I SF 13-Apr-2000 -5,755,859.38
OIN060650 6.000%05/15/2029 22-May-2000 5,755,859.38
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT I8-Apr-2000 -7,300,000.00
682680A32 FLTG RT 04242002 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2000 7,300,000.00
B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,300,0*00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 18-Apr-2000 -7,300,000.00
682680A32 FLTG RT 04242002 DO 0424/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00
FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 24-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN N SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -173,383.00
12560QAK5 5.625%02/022001 DO 02/0219 25-Apr-2000 173,383.00
B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
175,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS MTN N SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -2,269.53
12560QAK5 5,625%021022001 DO 0210219 25-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Erecuriw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 18
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
175,000.00 CIT GROUP FLOGS MTN h SR 000 19-Apr-2000 -175,652.53
12560QAK5 5.625%02/02/2001 DO 02/02/9 25-Apr-2000 0.00
FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDOS MTN 25-Apr-2000 -5,000,000.00
79548EEE8 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2000 5,000,000.00
B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 25-Apr-2000 .5,000,000.00
79548EEE8 FLTG RT 04/282003 DO 0428/ 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 25-Apr.2000 .7,000,000.00
67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/012005 DD 0428/0 28-Apr-2000 7,000,000.00
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS MC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 25-Apr.2000 .7,000,000.00
67982XAA6 VAR RT 1 110 1/2 0 0 5 DO 0428/0 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 26-Apr-2000 -1,594,032.00
020002AL5 T875%05/012005 DO 0510110 01-May-2000 1,594,032.00
B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -3,392,828.12
912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DD 101151 28-Apr-2000 3,392,828.12
B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00
09-May-1000 8.53:59 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 19
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEr AMOUNT]
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAR4/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,400,OW.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -7,949.73
912827Z62 06.500%10/152006DD 10/151 28-Apr-2000 0.00
IB 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 -3,400,677.85
912827Z62 06.500Ye 10/15/2006 DO 101151 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 28-Apr-2000 0.00
PAY UPS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,820.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -5,920.00
9128275W8 4.250-/a001/152010 DO 011151 15-Jan-2000 5,820.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,820.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -5,820.00
9128275W8 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 15-Ian-2000 0.00
FC 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
131,240.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan.2000 -131,240.00
9128272M3 3.375%01115/2D07 DD 01/15/ 15-Ian-2000 131,240.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
131,240.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.1an-2000 -131,240.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jan-20W 0.00
FC 28-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Maj 2 00 8:53:59 Ereearro Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 20
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
50,102.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 154m-2000 -50,102.00
9128273A8 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 071I5/ 15-Jen-2000 50,102.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
50,102.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.Jen-2000 -50,102.00
9129273AS 3.625%07/15/2002 DO 071I3/ 15-len-2000 0.00
PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,283.30 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -7,293.30
79549BBOI 3.650%02/142D02 DO 02/141 14-Feb-2000 7,293.30
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,283.30 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2000 -7,283.30
79349BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2000 0.00
PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Apr2000 -9.00
3133TCE95 VARRTOB/152032 01-Apr-200D 9.00
PU 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Apr-2000 -9.00
3133TCE95 VARRTOS/15/=2 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 13-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2000 -12,052.43
3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11101/9 01-Apr.2000 12,052.43
PU 0.00
09-Map2000 8:53:59 Emaf/w Wakbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE L
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2000 -12,052.43
3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 19-Apr-2000 0.00
SALES
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-8,941.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr.2000 8,941.75
996085247 03-Apr-2000 -8,941.75
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-8,941.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr.2000 8,941.75
996085247 03-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-162,212.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2000 162,212.85
996035247 03-Apr-2000 -162,212.85
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-162,212.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2000 162.212.85
996085247 03-AM2000 0.00
FC 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 594,780.00
313384VZ9 MAT 04/24/2000 03-Apr.2000 -594,780.00
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
09-Ma 2 00 8:53:59 Erecotiw Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE..- 22
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GARWLOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 3,144.50
313384VZ9 MAT 04242000 03-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Apr-2000 597,924.50
313384VZ9 MAT 04242000 03-Apr-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-797.161.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 797,161.93
996085247 04-Apr-2000 -797,161.93
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-797,161.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 797,161.93
996095247 04-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 04-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-5.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 5.95
996085247 05-Apr-2000 -5.95
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
.5.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Apr-2000 5.95
996085247 05-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 05-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 800,000.00
9936RA600 05.950%04/052000 DO 041041 05-Apr-2000 -800,000.00
S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
09-May-2000 8.53:59 Eremliw Worlrbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSCr00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-800000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 132.22
9936BA600 05.9509/.04/05/2000 DO 04/04/ 05-Apr-20DO 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-M,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Apr-2000 900,132.22
9936SA600 05.950%04/05/2000 DO 04/04/ 05-Apr-2000 0.00
FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 197,938.20
313588VV4 MAT 0420/2000 05-Apr-2000 -197,938.06
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.14
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-200,OOD.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 1,570.13
313588VV4 MAT 04202000 05-Apr2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Apr-2000 199,509.33
313588VV4 MAT 04202000 05-Apr-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS MC,NEW YORK 05-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-94,132.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-20DO 94,132.76
996095247 10-Apr-2000 44,132.76
s 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-84,132.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I O-Apr-2000 84,132.76
996085247 10-Apr-2000 0,00
FC 10-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wokberrch
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 14
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS000010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSO-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,197,299.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 11-Apr-2000 197,299.23
996085247 1I-Apr-2000 -197,299.25
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-197,299.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Apr-2000 197,299.25
996085247 11-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 11-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I I-Apr-2000 4,954,500.00
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 -4,954,694.45
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK -194.45
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I I-Apr-2000 28,320.83
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I i-Apr-2000 4,992,820.83
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 11-Apr-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK I I-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 2,972,816.66
3133%WH2 MATURES 03/072000 13-Apr-2000 .2,972,816.67
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK .0.01
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 17,873.34
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 13-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
09-Ma)4000 8:53:59 Erecudw Workbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 13-Apr-2000 2,990,690.00
313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 13-Apo-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 13-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,785.29 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCp 18-Apr-2000 7,785.29
9%087094 18-Apr.2000 -7,785.29
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-89,091.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-2000 99,091.57
996085247 18-Apr.2000 -89,091.57
S 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-99,091.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Apr-2000 89,091.57
996095247 18-Apr.2000 0.00
FC I B-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-972,270.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CAST I MGMT 19-Apr-2000 972,270.78
996095247 19-Apr-2000 -972,270.78
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-972,270.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2000 972,270.78
996085247 19-Apr.2000 0,00
FC 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-85,860.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2000 85,90.23
996085247 20-Apr-2000 -85,860.25
S 0.00
09-May1000 8:53:59 Executive Workbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATP1 COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-85,860.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Apr-2000 85,860.25
996085247 20-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.11,666.41 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 21-Apr.2000 11,666.41
996087094 21-Apr-2000 -11,666.41
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-93,628.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 93,628.59
996085247 24-Apr-2000 .93,629.59
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-93,628.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2000 93,628.59
996085247 24-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 24-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr-2000 2,100,000.00
9936SP581 05.770%04/24/2000 DD 04/20/ 24-Apr-2000 -Z100,000m
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr-2000 1,346.33
9936SP581 05.770%04/242000 DO 04/20/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 24-Apr.2000 2,101,346.33
99368P581 05.770%0424/2000 DO 0420/ 24-Apr-2000 0.00
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8.53:59 Exwwiv ft kbeae8
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCEG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD.CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 5,053,7U.33
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 -5,053,788.33
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 39.570.34
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-51100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 24-Apr-2000 5,093,358.67
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 24-Apr-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 24-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,665.10 ESDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 28-Apr.2000 6,665.10
996087094 28-Apr.2000 -k665.10
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
A74,773.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67
996085247 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67
S 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,474,773.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2000 474,773.67
996085247 28-Apr-2000 0.00
PC 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 5,053,788.33
313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 28-Apr-2000 -5,053,788.33
S MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 E..tie Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28
PORTFOLIO DETAIL.
OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 42,896.67
313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 28-Apr-2000 5,096,685.00
313396WH2 MATURES 03/07/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 4,059,045.56
313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 -4,059,045.56
S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 36.922.77
333588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
4,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Apr-2000 4,095,969.33
313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Mer-2000 2,075,581.44
912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DD IM51 03-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GREEN WICH CAP MKTS INC,GREE 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 10,431,953.13
OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2030 19-Apr-2000 -10,240,312.50
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 191.640.63
09-Map1000 8:53:59 Executive Wokbeac8
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 29
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
ocsGOoo/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 10,431,953.13
OIN062649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 9,954,492.19
OIM62649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 -9,774,943.75
S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 179,648.44
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 12-Apr-2000 9,954,492.19
OIN062649 6.500%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 310,745.27
36210REF3 8.000%04/152030 DD 04/01/ 19-Apr-2000 -307,726.93
S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 3,019.34
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
,306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 1,226.50
36210REF3 8.000%04/1 512 0 3 0 DO 04/011 19-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-306,625.00 GNMA POOL#0499734 13-Apr-2000 311,971.77
36210REF3 8.000%04/15/2030DD041OI/ 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY - 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Apr-2000 5,760,253.91
OIN060643 6.000%04/152029 19.Apr-2000 -5,662,109.38
S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 98,14C53
O9-May-2000 8:53:59 Fsmmive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Apr-2000 5,760,253.91
OIN060643 6.000-/.04/152029 19-Apr-2000 0.00
FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 4,998,43750
912827Z62 06.500%10/15/2006 DO 101151 01-May-2000 -4,967,578.13
S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 30,959.37
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Apr-2000 14,207.65
912827Z62 06.500%10/152006 DO 101151 01-May-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 6,045,609.38
912810DG0 11.875%11/152003 DO 101051 28-Apr-2000 -6,698,250.00
S DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR -652,640.62
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 279,910.71
912810DG0 11.875% 11/152003 DO 101051 28-Apr-2000 0.00
IS 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 27-Apr-2000 6,325,520.09
912810DG0 11.875%11/152003 DO 10/05/ 28-Apr-2000 0.00
FC DEUTSCHE BK SEC INC,NEW YOR 28-Apr-2000 0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
09-May-2000 8.53:59 &cmilm Wo kbeneb
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 31
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,748.75 FHLMC GROUP M78-6064 01-Mar-2000 5,748.75
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/011 01-Mar-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,976.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 -43,976.50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 01-Mar-2000 44,024-60
PDC 48.10
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,984.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 43,98450
3133TCE95 VARRT081152032 01-Mar-2000 -44,032.60
PD -48.I0
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,984.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 43,994-50
3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 01-Mar-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Apr-2000 40,315.65
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Apr-2000 40,258.%
PD 56.69
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Apr-2000 40,315.65
3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34,577.00 FRLMC MULTICLASS CFF 2146 QT 01-Apr-2000 34,577.00
3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Apr-2000 -33,966.50
PD 610.50
09-Map2000 8:53:59 Executive Wvwkbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 32
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNTI
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34,577.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Apr-2000 34,577.00
3133TKKU3 6.000%11/15/2011 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Apr-2000 38,567.02
3128DDQ55 7,000%02/01/2003 DO 02/011 01-Apr-2000 -39,169.63
PD -602.61
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP SG5-0476 01-Apr-2000 38,567.02
3128DDQ55 7.0005602/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2000 46,069.54
36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/01/9 01-Apr-2000 47,077.31
PD -1,007.77
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 8080088M 01-Apr-2000 46,069.54
36225CC20 VAR RT 06202027 DO 06/0119 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
4,489.10 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-Apr-2000 4,489.10
31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2000 4,379.68
PD 109.42
LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO
48,755.45 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Apr-2000 48,755.45
36225CAZ9 7.125%17J20/2026 DO 12101/ 01-Apr-2000 49,562.96
PI) -807.51
09-May-2000 8.53:59 Ex .aw Wo kbomh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 33
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
Ocscoo0/oo9a 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSDCONSOLIDATED
SHARESIVAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SEITL DATFI COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4$755.45 GNMA II POOL 40080023 01-Apr-2000 48.755.45
36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 12/011 01-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-34,076.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Apr.2000 34,076.00
3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 01-Apr-2000 -34,113.27
PD -37.27
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,845.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 995 01-Apr-2000 1.845.10
39810#AE4 7.430°h06/012003 DO 022910 01-Apr.2000 .1,818.14
PD 26.96
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,945.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP F14A#95 01-Apr-2000 1,845.10
39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 01.Apr-2000 0.00
FC 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.566.63 WMP/HUNIOON PAIGE#000.11150 01-Apr-2000 566.63
302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Apt-2000 -554.32
PD 12.31
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-566.63 WMPIHUNTOON PAIGE 9000-11150 01-Apr-2000 566.63
302998GE3 7.500%1 2/012 0 3 0 DO 102119 01-Apr.2000 0.00
FC 27-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Apr-2000 24,064.04
3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 082619 15-Apr-2000 .24,064.04
PD 0.00
09-May-2000 8.'53:59 &ec m Workbench
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 34
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOL/DATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-I 15-Apr-2000 24,064.04
3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DO 08/26/9 15-Apr.2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK.AUTO TR 96A C 15-Apr-2000 7,786.30
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03/1519 15-Apr-2000 .7,786.30
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Apr-2000 7.796.30
31677EAA4 6-200%09/012001 DO 03/1519 15-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.51,068.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2000 51,068.50
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2000 .51,069.50
PD 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-51,068.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Apo-2000 51,068.50
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-192,690.06 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN 98-2 AI 25-Apr-2000 182,690.06
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 25-Apr.2000 ,192,297.56
PD 392.50
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-192,690.06 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 AI 25-Apr-2000 182,690.06
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 25-Apr-2000 0.00
FC 25-Apr•2000 0.00
MATURITIES
09-May-2000 8:53:59 &ecutim WorkbewA,
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: i5
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITYH/ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,800,000.00 CBA(DELAWAR)DISC 03-Apr-200D 2,769,970.00
1247SID37 04/03/2000 03-Apr-2000 -2,769,970.00
MT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
A300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Apr-2000 8,222,307.39
36959HD79 04/072000 07-Apr-200D -8,222,307.39
MT 07-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
,900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 892,343.00
2338EODA1 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 -892,343.00
MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 694,776.44
233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 ,694,776.44
MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
.4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 10-Apr-20D0 4,256,973.72
44922ADA5 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 4,256,973.72
MT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 12-Apr-2000 891,546.50
98412CDC0 04/122000 12-Apr-2000 -891,546.50
MT 12-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 13,861,699.45
98412CDH9 04/172000 17-Apr-2000 -13,861,699.45
MT 17-Apo2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wwkbertrh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 36
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I9-Apr-2000 497,223.33
3133%VT7 MAT04/18/2000 18-Apr-2000 497,223.33
MT IS-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Apr-2000 1,890,411.32
313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 20-Apr-2000 -1,880,411.52
MT 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 3,172,160.00
313384VZ9 MAT 04/242000 24-Apr-2000 -3,172,160.00
MT 24-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 3,199,499.78
313384WA3 MAT 04252000 25-Apr-2000 -3,199,499.79
MT 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 1,299,261.00
313396WA7 MAT 04252000 INCOME AT MAT 25-Apr-2000 -1,288,261.00
MT 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 1,799,714.00
313384WBI MAT 0426/2000 26-Apr-2000 -1,799,714.00
MT 26-Apr-2000 0.00
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Apr-2000 6,000,000.00
63858IDE6 5.850%04/07/2000 DD 04/07/9 07-Apr-2000 -5,996,400.00
MT 07-Apr-2000 3,600.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 37
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATF/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
INTEREST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 29-De 1999 -32,046.25
42332SBK8 FLTG RT 0&7517001 DO 0625/ 25-Dec-l"9 0.00
TIC 29-De 1999 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 15-Mar-2000 -61,930.56
06605TAL6 6.125%03/15/2002 DD 03/12/9 15-Ma 2000 0.00
ITC I5-Mar-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS 15-MW-2000 61,250.00
06605TAL6 6.125%03/IS/2002 DO 0311219 15-Mar-2000 0.00
IT 15-Mar-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
150,000.00 MORGAN I P&CO MTN SR 00043 03-Apr-2000 4,593.75
61687YBU0 6.125%10/02/2000 DD 10102/9 02-Apr2000 0.00
IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Apr-2000 1.09
996087094 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 03-Apr-2000 79,697.50
59018SXP4 6.375%10101/2001 DO 1010319 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Map-1000 8.53:59 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 03-Apr-2000 39,696.56
52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DO 03/29/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,800,000.00 CBA(DELAWAR)DISC 03-Apr-2000 30,030.00
12478JD37 04/03/2000 03-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 03-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 247.13
996095247 01-Apr-2000 0.00
1T 04-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2000 2,838.07
996085247 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 04-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MT 07-Apr-2000 175,500.00
638581DE6 5.850Y 0 4/0 720 0 0 DO 04/0719 07-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 07-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,300,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07-Apr-2000 77,692.61
36959HD79 04/07/2000 07-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 07-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN 8 TR 00538 10-Apr-2000 31,590.00
345402YKI 7.0200/.10/10/2000 DO 10/10/9 10-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Map2000 8:53:59 Ereculive Workbewh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 7,657.00
233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 10-Apr-2000 5,223.56
233SEODAI 04/102000 10-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 10-Apr-2000 43,026.28
44922ADAS 04/10/2000 10-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 10-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 12-Apr-2000 8,453.50
98412CDCO 04/122000 12-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 12-Apr-2000 0.00
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 13-Apr-2000 29,843.96
423328BK8 FLTG RT 06/252001 DO 06/25/ 25-Dec-1999 0.00
IT 13-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 13-Apr-2000 8.00
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Mer-2000 0.00
IT 13-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
475,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORP 17-Apr-2000 15,140.63
318074AFS 6.375%10/152000 DD 10111/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8:53:59 Executive Wwkbemh
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLMATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
23,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-Apr-2000 747,500.00
912827ZE2 06.500%10/15/2006DD 10/15/ 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 17-Apr-2000 67,500.00
073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN WTR 00299 17-Apr-2000 61,900.00
61745ENLI FLTG FIT 04/152002 DO 04/15/ 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
38,567.02 FHLMC GROUP kG5-0476 17-Apr-2000 50,643.79
3128DDQ55 7.0000/h 02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,000,000.00 XEROX CORP DISC 17-Apr-2000 138,300.55
98412CDH9 04/172000 17-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
34,577.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 17-Apr-2000 12,390.69
3133TKKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Apr2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
40,315.65 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 17-Apr-2000 2,270.75
3133T02D5 5.900%06/1512017 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May 2000 8:53:59 Exemim T kbewc ,
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 41
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCS0000/0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,748.75 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 17-Apr-2000 1,802.33
31348SWZ3 6.3840/o01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,994.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CPF E3 A 17-Apr-2000 15,793.54
3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Mar-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,064.04 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 17-Apr-2000 1.979.13
3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 08/26/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,786.30 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 17-Apr-2000 232.60
31677EAA4 6.200%09/01/2001 DO 03115/9 15-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
51,069.50 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 17-Apr-2000 14,952.70
3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16t203O 16-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 17-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB IS-Apr-2000 5,060.10
3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/192000 DD 051181 18-Apr-2000 0.00
IT I8-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 1 B-Apr-2000 2,776.67
3133%VT7 MAT 04/182000 1B-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 18-Apr-2000 0.00
09-Mak2000 8:53:59 Executive Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 42
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
GCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO
12,052.43 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 19-Apr-2000 12,052.43
3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 19-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 20-Apr-2000 11,666,67
3837H3C70 7.000%12/20/2022 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Apr-2000 19,589.48
313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 20-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
46,069.54 GNMA 11 POOL 0090088M 20-Apr-2000 10,503.47
36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 DO 0610119 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2000 O.OD
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
48,755.45 GNMA H POOL#0080023 20-Apr-2000 8,811.13
36225CAZ9 7.125%1220/2026 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN STRO06 20-Apr-2000 20,905.82
17120QEBO FLTG RT 08/082002 DO 04/08/ 20-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 20-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Apr-2000 27,840.00
313384VZ9 MAT 04/24/2000 24-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 24-Apr-2000 0.00
09-M,0,2000 8:53:59 Erec.11w Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
OCSG00010000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDAM
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Apr-2000 10,833.33
3133TDPVZ 6.500°/h09252018 25-Mar-2000 0.00
1T 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 25-Apr-2000 510.22
313384WA3 MAT04/25/2000 25-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2000 11,739.00
313396WA7 MAT 04/25P2000 INCOME AT MAT 25.Apr-2000 0.00
IT 25-Apr2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,845.10 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 495 25-Apr-2000 8,170.75
39810®AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 25-Apn2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
182,690.06 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 At 25-Apr-2000 46,039.59
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 061181 25-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 25-Apr-2000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-Apr-2000 286.00
313394WBI MAT 0426/2000 26-Apo-2000 0.00
IT 26-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
566.63 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 27-Apr-2000 6,098.47
302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 27-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-2000 8.'53:59 &ec.&i Workbench
Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 44
PORTFOLIO DETAIL
0CSG000I0000 01-APR-2000-30-APR-2000
OCSD-CONSOLIDATED
SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/
SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/
TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 5,820.00
9128275W8 4.250%001/15/2010 DO 011151 0.00
CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 28-Apr-2000 -19.04
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 28-Apr-2000 0.00
C W 28-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN#TR 00246 28-Apr.2000 47,775.00
42333HLF7 FLTG RT 0428/2003 DO 041271 28-Apr-2000 0.00
IT 28-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY MTN#TR 00311 28-Apr.2000 26,783.50
61745ENY3 FLTG RT 01/28/2002 DO 11127/ 2&Apr-2000 0.00
IT 28-Apr.2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 28-Apr.2000 7,283.30
79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 0.00
CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 131,240.00
9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00
CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Apr-2000 50,102.00
9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 0.00
CD 28-Apr-2000 0.00
09-May-1000 8:53:59 &x cwr WmkbencF,
FAHR COMMITTEE Meetlng Da a T. Id,
05/10/m OS/24100
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Ite.Wu ber
FAHR00-36 1Hrn
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH
MARCH 31, 2000
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2000.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly
reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two
funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,"
are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the
District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment
Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has
tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated
revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next
six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase
agreements or derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
X Yxp.tlM1WpeMa�aE ApeMa 0.aytlaW]IBwN Apentla Pepah'A:A.11eT 15�t�.pcc
a�ve., i�ee Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports
The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment
Measurement Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for
reference. Also attached are four comparative bar charts which depict the sector
diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of
December 31, 1999 and March 31, 2000. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio,
with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent
investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios
as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through
March 31, 2000.
Portfolio Pa ormance summary
Quarter Ended March 31,2000
Liquid Operating Monies Long-Term Operating Monies(%)
(%)
Trial as Total Rate of
of Return Benchmark"' Return Benchmark',
3 Months is 1.4 1.6 1.
6 Months 2.0 2.6 2.3 1.7
9 Months 4.3 3.8 3. .a
12 Monhs 5.5 5.0 3.5 3.1
since Inception 30 Sept.95 5.5 5.1 6.1 5.a
Market Value per PIMCO 31 Mar.00 919.91A $351.6M
Average Qualay 'AA. 'AAA'
Current Yield(%) 6.2 8.2
Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) a 0.9
Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) 3.5M
Estimated Annual Income $1.1M 321.111M
(1) Benchmarks:
• Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index
• Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt 1-5 Year Bond Index
Market Recap
Interest rates diverged at both the short and long ends of the Treasury yield
curve, as the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates twice during the quarter to
prevent the economy from overheating.
At their February 2 meeting, the Federal Reserve raised the fed funds rate by 25
basis points, from 5.50%to 5.75%. The Fed announced another 25 basis point
increase to 6.00% at their March 21 meeting, and suggested future rate hikes
because "...increases in demand will continue to exceed the growth in potential
HM dasIsnili/.good•p•pracK00 eyy A,-.Rapeasevol 15,so
R•'Yii : 1AV95 Page 2
J'
supply, which could foster inflationary imbalances that would undermine the
record economic expansion."
Short-term interest rates rose as much as 57 basis points for the 3-month
Treasury Bill (from 5.30% to 5.87%), fueled largely by the belief of investors that
the Fed would again raise interest rates. On the other hand, long-term rates fell
as investors grew concerned that the Federal government's debt buyback
program would create a scarcity of long-dated Treasuries.
As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the Historical Yield Curve, the
yield on the 30-year Treasury benchmark fell 64 basis points, closing the first
quarter at 5.84% when compared to the end of the fourth quarter 1999 at 6.47%.
Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds ended the quarter at 6.00%, a decline of 40
basis points from the end of the fourth quarter(6.40%).
For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a slightly
below index weighted maturity or duration (2.2 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing
holdings in mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporate notes, and
real return bonds. The performance of the portfolio outperformed its benchmark
by 36 basis points for the first quarter 2000 (1.63% vs. 1.27%).
For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO continued to use an "at index'
duration (approximately 73 days vs. 90 days), emphasizing investment grade
corporate securities and high-quality commercial paper. This added returns to
the portfolio, which outperformed its benchmark by 35 basis points for the first
quarter (1.54% vs. 1.19%).
Market Outlook
Forecasts from PIMCO report that U.S. economic expansion will slow as higher
interest rates curb growth in the housing market and investment spending.
PIMCO expects the Fed to tighten the federal funds rate with at least two more
25 basis point rate hikes this year amid concern that rapid growth could outstrip
the economy's capacity and fuel inflation.
The PIMCO investment strategy targets portfolio duration near the benchmarks
to take advantage of higher yields provided by longer maturity securities, while
limiting overall interest rate risk. PIMCO indicates that they will continue to hold
short maturity corporate and U.S. government agency debt issues; concentrate
on high quality commercial paper for liquidity; and emphasize asset-backed
securities and mortgages, especially GNMA's which are backed by the"full faith
and credit" of the U.S. government, to capture higher relative yields.
The attached letter from PIMCO provides a more detailed description of first-
quarter market conditions, portfolio returns, future market outlook, and their
recommended investment strategy for the District's Liquid and Long-Term
Operating Monies portfolios.
Ht ftmg d"1 WAVe Ra Wooe M 'skit a"c
neae.d.1e Page 3
Portfolio Market Values
On February 24, 2000, the District received approximately $63.5 million from the
Orange County Investment Pool bankruptcy settlement distributions. With
settlement of the Orange County bankruptcy claims, the District has recovered
94% of the amount the District had on deposit with the Orange County
Investment Pool at the time of the County's bankruptcy. The funds were
deposited in the District's Long-Term portfolio for investment.
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the
table below, and in the attached bar chart.
Liquid Long-Term
Quarter Operating Operating
Ending Monies(fM) Monies(fM)
31 March 99 18.8 305.8
30 Jm1e 99 19.0 305.g
30 Sept.99 19.3 271.1
31 Dee.09 19.8 282.8
31 Mamh W 19.9 351.fi
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart
4. Four Comparative Bar Charts
5. Historical Yield Curve Graph
6. PIMCO Letter dated April 27. 2000
SVK:Ic
NM A�RA,en*00008-N RB^^4a R.eonz WMem 15,'EI.Oz
Rezea. 15
Page 4
e
Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:31 PM
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification
100
90
80
,^ 70
60 ❑ 12/31/99
c 50 ® 3/31/00
N 40 4039
3
°" 30
20 11 9
10 0 0 0 0
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dtaVint22201geggitFinancetPortfolio long term graph
Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:36 PM
OCSD Liquid
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Credit Quality
100
90
80
70
60
52 ❑ 12/31 /99
CD 50I— -
43 ® 3/31/00
a`) 40d
3024 20 21
20
10 3 3
0
A11P1 AAA AA A
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio short term
E.�
4
Prepared by Finance, 05101/2000, 1:37 PM
OCSD Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Credit Quality
100
90
80
70
60 ❑ 12/31/99
50 la3/31/00
2, 40
a 30
20 19 23 20
17
10
0
AU] I E-1=
A1/P1 AAA AA A
G1excel.dta\lnt2220tgegg[TinanceXPortfollo long term graph
Prepared by Finance, 05/01/2000, 1:12 PM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
7.00
6.75
6.50
6.25
6.00
; 5.75
c
w 5.50
i
5.25
5.00
4.75
4.50
4.26
4.00
E E 5 >` 5 a` 5 5 S 5 `a, .
P! N M V N n O N M
- 30-Sep-99 -6 31-1)ea99 f31-Mar-00
G:\excel.dta\On12220\geggi\Finance\HlstodcalTREASURYyleldcuive
P I M C O
PACIFIC INV65TNeNi MANAGEMENT COMYANT
a40New;,MCenter Drive
SWte 300
NewpER Beech,CA 92660
Tel: 949.720.6000
April 27, 2000 F.:949.720.1376
Mr. Steve Kozak
Finance Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Re: 1st Quarter 2000 Report
Dear Steve:
What follows is a description of events in the bond markets during the 1st Quarter 2000 and an
analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and
Liquid portfolios over the period. I have also included a section on strategies to be pursued in
your portfolio during the coming months.
Bond Market Recaa:
U.S. Yield Curve Inverts Amid Government Debt Buyback
The short and long ends of the Treasury market diverged during the first quarter. Short-term
Treasury yields rose as much as 57 basis points in anticipation of more tightening by the
Federal Reserve. The 30-year yield fell 64 basis points, closing the quarter at 5.84 percent, as
investors grew concerned that the government's debt buyback would create a scarcity of long-
term Treasuries. Yields on mortgages and corporate bonds did not fall in line with Treasuries,
which caused yield premiums on non-Treasury bonds to widen.
The market correctly anticipated the Fed's intentions, as the central bank raised the federal
funds' rate twice in 25 basis point increments during the quarter. The Fed suggested that
more rate hikes are in the offering because "increases in demand will continue to exceed the
growth in potential supply, which could foster inflationary imbalances that would undermine
the record economic expansion."
Those imbalances include the record U.S. trade deficit, high corporate and individual debt
levels and tight labor markets. Strong equity and housing markets also represent a potential
threat because they create a wealth effect that fuels consumer demand. Still, actual inflation
remained relatively subdued during the quarter. While effects of increased energy prices
showed up in higher headline consumer price inflation, the core rate outside of energy and
food costs was little changed.
v
Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Two
ECB Tightens to Check Inflation; Japan Remains Sluggish
The European Central Bank also tightened twice in the first quarter. Faster economic growth
in the 11-nation euro zone pushed inflation above the ECB's two percent limit in several
countries, prompting the rate hikes. ECB tightening was also designed to bolster the euro,
which weakened in recent months amid capital outflows to the U.S. Japan moved in the
opposite direction from Europe and the U.S. The government announced a 1.4 percent
contraction in fourth quarter GDP, the second consecutive quarterly decline, as consumer
confidence remained weak despite substantial fiscal stimulus.
Yield Curve Shift, Credit Concerns Benefit Treasuries
Treasuries generally outperformed during the first quarter. Falling 10- and 30-year Treasury
yields and concern about credit deterioration in the midst of Fed tightening lured investors
away from other bond market sectors. The following summarizes relative sector performance:
• Mortgages lagged Treasuries as higher interest rate volatility and concern about
government agency credit quality caused yield premiums to widen.
• Corporate bonds fared even worse than mortgages, especially the non-investment grade
sector. Supply pressures were a negative early in the quarter, coupled with concern about
rising corporate debt levels associated with share repurchases and heightened LBO activity.
• By contrast, emerging market bonds, led by lower-quality credits in Russia and Ecuador,
continued to outperform Treasuries. Stronger global growth and higher commodity prices
also supported upper-tier credits such as Mexico, whose credit rating was raised to
investment grade.
• Currency-hedged European and Japanese bonds also underperformed, unable to keep pace
with the Treasury rally despite lower levels of economic growth than the U.S.
Performance Attribution:
Long Term Portfolio
The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District
turned in a 1.63 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year
Government Corporate Index by 36 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part
to the following factors:
• Our below-index duration positively impacted returns as short-term interest rates rose.
• A broader-than-index maturity structure was modestly positive as short maturity rates
rose most.
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Three
Performance Attribution: (Continued)
• A mortgage emphasis added to returns slightly as our concentration in GNMA's
benefited from investor demand for government guaranteed securities.
• Investment-grade corporates were neutral as relatively high yields offset the 'impact of
widening credit spreads.
• Asset-backed securities helped returns because yield premiums continued to narrow as
issuance declined.
• Real return bonds outperformed like-duration Treasuries, adding to performance, as
real yields fell.
Liquid Portfolio
The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District
turned in a 1.54 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill
Index by 35 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following
factors:
• Our index-like portfolio duration was neutral.
• Investment-grade corporates added to returns as higher yields more than offset the
impact of widening spreads.
• High quality commercial paper added to returns due to their yield advantage over
Treasuries.
Economic Outlook:
U.S. and European Economic Growth To Converge
U.S. expansion will decelerate as higher interest rates curb growth in the housing market and
investment spending. European growth will pick up and approach that of the U.S. due to a
relatively accommodative monetary policy and a weak euro. Japan's economy will remain
weak as a highly stimulative fiscal policy shows few signs of sparking sustainable growth.
The following points elaborate our outlook:
• U.S. mortgage rates well above 8 percent will discourage new home sales and slow
consumer spending through reductions in durable goods' purchases that typically
accompany home purchases.
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
d
Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Four
Economic Outlook: (Continued)
• U.S. investment spending growth has already started to turn down as a percentage of total
GDP growth and will continue to moderate as higher rates raise the cost of capital
investment.
• Monetary policy in the U.S. will be restrictive, with at least two more 25 basis point rate
hikes this year, amid concern that rapid growth could outstrip the economy's capacity and
fuel inflation.
• Interest rates in the U.S. will remain relatively stable, with some upward pressure given
the direction of Fed policy.
• In Europe, consumer confidence should continue to rise and enhance growth prospects now
that average unemployment has fallen into single digits and is nearing a seven-year low.
• Japan's growing debt burden and deteriorating credit fundamentals threaten to push interest
rates higher and limit any resurgence in the economy.
European Inflation Will Continue to Lag That of U.S.
U.S. inflation will remain above last year's relatively low levels following recent increases in
commodity and import prices, but will moderate later this year after the impact of higher oil
prices has been realized. European inflation will increase but remain below that of the U.S.
because Europe's expansion is at an earlier stage and its unused capacity is greater, especially
in the labor market.
Financial Imbalances Make Portfolio Quality Critical
Japan is not the only country where mounting debt poses risks. The U.S. is also vulnerable to
higher interest rates and/or declining asset prices because of financial imbalances. Non-U.S.
investors may eventually require higher rates to finance the record U.S. current account
deficit. Current high levels of consumer and corporate debt will be hard to sustain if the assets
backing the debt (stocks, for example) fall in value.
Avoiding adverse price performance arising from credit deterioration will be critical for
earning superior returns in this environment.
Longer maturity Treasuries, which will benefit from U.S. budget surpluses and debt buybacks,
are one alternative. Mortgages are another because they offer attractive yields relative to
Treasuries with little or no credit risk. GNMA mortgages, for example, are backed by the
"full faith and credit" of the U.S. government. Corporate and emerging market bonds are
most vulnerable to declines in credit quality, though their attractive yields may compensate for
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
i
Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Five
Avoiding adverse price performance arising from credit deterioration will be critical for
earning superior returns in this environment. (Continued)
the added risk. Among developed non-U.S. markets, European and Japanese government
bonds are likely to lag Treasuries as European growth converges with the U.S. and concerns
about Japan's credit standing increase.
Strateev:
The following lists highlight the strategies that will be used in the Long Term portfolio in the
coming months:
• While continuing to emphasize yield, position portfolios for an overall "flight to
quality" in the bond market.
• Target duration near the benchmark to take advantage of higher yields on longer-
maturity securities without increasing interest rate risk.
• Maintain a broader-than-index maturity structure in order to capture value across the
yield curve.
• Emphasize mortgages to earn attractive yields, especially GNMA's, which should
benefit from investors' search for "full faith and credit" government securities.
• Concentrate investment-grade corporate holdings on shorter-maturity bonds that are
less vulnerable to widening yield premiums.
• Continue to favor adjustable-rate mortgages as higher yielding, short-term holdings.
• Hold high quality asset-backed securities with a focus on home equity and other higher
yielding market segments.
The following lists highlights the strategies that will be used in the Liquid portfolio in the
coming months:
• Target duration near the index to capture yield while limiting overall interest rate
sensitivity.
• Continue to hold select short-duration corporate issues to take advantage of high yields
given minimal added risk.
• Emphasize high quality commercial paper and shorter-terns agency debt issues due to
strong liquidity, attractive yields and limited credit risk.
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Mr. Steve Kozak April 27, 2000
Orange County Sanitation District Page Six
Steve, we hope this information proves useful. We look forward to discussing these and other
issues with you in the near future.
Sincerely,
'^ I 'L' R. Doti
Rita J. Seymour Joseph A. Fournier
Vice President Account Manager
RJS/JAF:ci
PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
FAIiRCOMMITTEE MeebRgDere To6,oror.
s(1o/o0 5Ra/ao
AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Bean Number
FAHROO-37 15(e)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report prepared by staff
for the period ended March 31, 2000.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the
period ending March 31, 2000.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial
and Operational Report for the period ended March 31, 2000. This report is a
consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the
District through the third quarter of the 1999-00 fiscal year.
Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of
the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program,
individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within
this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan
milestones identified in the 1999-00 Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 74.57 percent, or
$32,810,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has been
expended. Net costs have increased 3.50 percent in comparison with the same
period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2000 is $495.41 based on flows of
66.2 billion gallons, or 243 million gallons per day. This is $13.17, or 2.73
percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is
due to the shortfall in flows which are 3.7 percent below the budgeted amount of
250 million gallons per day.
Capital improvement outlays through March 31 were 45.12 percent of budget, or
$41,691,800.
X:txp.pYLynnY3mN Agenda ReppM*=0epeld Agenda Rerdaft TBem 1510dee
Renee: 1W Page 1
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $141.37 million, or 75.42
percent of budget through March 31. Costs related to capital improvement
projects are only at $41.69 million, or 45.12 percent of budget. This capital
outlay shortage is offset by the excess costs incurred in Revenue Area Operating
and Other Expenses totaling $29.4 million, or 314.0 percent of the $9.4 million
budget. Of this total amount, $22,782,400 was a write-off of investments
previously held in the Orange County Investment Pool.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ATTACHMENTS
District's Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended
March 31. 2000.
H kAp Agenda Re,gdnaQ 0&unC Agenda RepoaeVI neon lstel dde
R-. 1� Page 2
Y
FAHRCOMMITTEE MeedngDrt ToXads.
5/10/00 5/24/00
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem NumE
Faraoo-sa lstn
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources
Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources
SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY
RESOLUTION 98-33
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,
Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual.
SUMMARY
The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent
language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation
or to explain procedures more clearly.
Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in
gray; deleted language is lined through.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ , This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
M\ry.MeYDeMaeb.re nv.^e. 9 ,d Ay.^tla Rapa4VAWJlem tsln da
Page 1
T
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Policy Number From To Reason
And Subject For Change
clo.o0—classlfo.tions.Position, Current'Map'Language Pay for Performance Charges per the OCEA
Salary Ranges and wages and pay ranges. language&pay ranges for negotiations and updates
OCEA.Removal of needed to clarify the policy.
probationary Increases For
OCEA.clarification on
timing of reclassirrtatiaru.
Clarify'pronUon'of meant
increases.
CM.00—Compensation Current'Mep language Pay for Performance Changes per the OCEA
and pay ranges, language 8 pay ranges for negotiations and updates
OCEA.Removal of needed to clarify the policy.
probationary fricassee for
OCEA.Clarification on
timing of reclassifications.
Clarity'proration'of merit
increases.
C30.00-Appraisal of Performance Cunenl'step'language Pay for Performance Changesperthe OCEA
and pay ranges. language&pay ranges For negotiations.
OCEA.
D90.OD-Tullion Reimbursement Current language. Define eligible employees. Clarity policy and increase
Program Streamline reimbursement accountability of staff.
process.Make employee
more accountable for
subrntting request for
reimbursement.
Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated
to reflect the changes outlined above and is attached for review and acceptance.
Exhibit A can be found in Attachment 1.
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Policy C10.00 Classifications, Positions, Salary Ranges and Wages
2. Policy C20.00 Compensation
3. Policy C30.00 Appraisal of Performance
4. Policy D90.00 Tuition Reimbursement Program
XYgeY\pme�akoN 1petla aeWmlMOP dAWMa aepwaYxMaM�15a).e%
Page 2
g
V
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-09
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN
RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
M�MM��f1f�111Y1�1�
The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby
amended by amending Policy No. C10.00, Classifications, Positions, Salary
Ranges and Wages, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby
amended by amending Policy No. C20.00, Compensation, set forth in
Attachment No. 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby
amended by amending Policy No. C30.00, Appraisal of Performance, set forth in
Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby
amended by amending Policy No. D90.00, Tuition Reimbursement Program, set
forth in Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 5: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD
98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33
be made by Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
H:\wp.dlaWminkB5V m0U10ns=000009.dw
ATTACHMENT 1
V,
Orange County Policy Number: C10.00 s 0
Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000
Subject: CLASSIFICATIONS, Supersedes: November 17, 1999
POSITIONS, SALARY
RANGES AND WAGES
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
use in the administration of the District's compensation programs.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 All District employees.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
Classifications are groups of positions, regardless of location,which are alike enough in
duties and responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title,to be given the same
pay scale under similar conditions, and to require substantially the same qualifications.
Salary Ranges are the range of pay rates,from minimum to maximum, set for a pay
grade or class.
4.0 POLICY
4.1 The District Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a wage
and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that allows
employees to effectively compete in the labor market and to retain present
employees through an internally consistent measure of relative job worth and
personal merit. Every position is assigned to a salary grade based upon the
duties and responsibilities of that position and the comparative market value of
that job function. Comparisons are most generally made with organizations of
similar size and engaged in similar occupational pursuits within the geographic
area of potential recruitment. The basic salary ranges are set forth on Exhibit A.
4.2 Non-management employees are awarded merit increases based upon their
performance, as determined by the performance evaluation program, and the
position of their salary within the pay range. The Merit Matrix is the tool used to
determine the actual amount of merit increase. In addition,employees ia4pe
who at least meet expectations receive
annual Cost of Living Adjustments(COLA)to keep employees'salaries at
market. The amount of the COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index(CPI,
All-Urban Consumers-LA, Riverside, Orange County)for the month of May and is
distributed as a base-building increase.
4.3 Employees in the Executive Management and Management Groups are awarded
merit increases based upon their performance, as determined by the
Page 1
performance evaluation program and the position of their salary relative to the
external market. External market rates are determined through the use of salary
surveys. The merit increase may be distributed as base building or non-base
building.
4.4 The General Manager is authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to
occupy budgeted positions and to exercise supervision over all persons in
accordance with the provisions of this policy and to terminate, for cause, the
employment of any regular full time employee employed under these provisions.
All other employees, e.g., probationary, part-time, and limited termftemporary
and contract may be terminated at the District's sole discretion.
4.5 The General Manager is also authorized to employ Executive Management
employees on an"at-will" basis. Such status shall be memorialized by a written
agreement signed by the General Manager and the Executive Manager,
acknowledging that the Executive Manager shall serve at the pleasure of the
General Manager. Any Executive Management employee so employed on the
date of adoption of this policy,who has not signed an"at-will"agreement may
voluntarily elect to do so, but may not be required to do so.
4.6 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this policy or any prior Board action, the
General Manager is authorized to periodically adjust the rate of compensation of
Executive Management employees who have signed"at-will"agreements so long
as no adjustment exceeds the compensation permitted by the applicable salary
range established by the Joint Boards of Directors.
4.7 Employees who believe their position is not properly classified may request a
classification study of their positron through their Department Head.
Classification studies shall only be conducted
during the budget planning process in accordance with a schedule that is
announced annually by the General Manager. Reclassifications approved in the
budget may be made effective any time during the new fiscal year. Classification
studies may also'be considered one other time during the year in November.
Classification study requests must be submitted to Human Resources no later
than October 1 P for the November cycle.
�u
3010.iec lde-May-ryGe.
4.7.2 All classification study findings regarding existing classifications are
subject to approval by the General Manager;findings recommending
new job classification titles are subject to approval by the District's
Boards of Directors.
4.8 The District shall provide an investment incentive salary to the employees within
the classifications and in the amounts,as set forth in Section 4.8.1, which
amounts are based on a percentage of salary equal to the amount previously
paid to designated employees pursuant to District Policy No.C150.00, Section
7.1, effective October 22, 1997,and repealed April 22, 1998.
4.8.1 The percentage of base salary amounts are as follows:
Executive management—6%(up to a maximum IRS amount)
Division management and supervisor—4%
Professional and confidential—3%
Page 2
v 5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Executive Management, Management,Supervisory, Professional and OCEA
Group Employees
5.1.1 New Employees. Employees
1axempt=-c2laFy ;aages shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum
of the range unless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings
result In a requirement for a salary greater than the minimum. The
determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships
to other employees in the same classification and to employees
supervised, if any.
5.1.1.1 Employees' serve
Probationary Period of six months and receive a
comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that
period. Employees who successfully conclude their
probation are eligible for a salary adjustment the subsequent
July in accordance with the provisions of the Management
Performance Review Program established by separate
action of the Boards of Directors as amended from time to
time.
5.1.2 Annual Management Performance Review Program. An annual
performance review is completed for all employees ire=exempt-range
alassiGsatierre in accordance with the provisions of the performance
evaluation Program. Performance based salary adjustments occur on the
first day of the first pay period in July, and may be prorated based upon
the date of hire,or promotion,aclacRirwreaae In those instances where
the individual has not concluded probation as of July 1,
5.1.3 Promotional Increases. Employees in"exempt" range classifications
who earn promotions to a new"exempt" range classification will normally
be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate
with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings, and in an
appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification
and to employees supervised. The new salary will normally represent an
increase of at least 5.5 percent. Employees A "exempt" e
alaesifisate"are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of
the Promotional Probationary Period. If the employee's probation period
has not concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary
adjustment is deferred unfil such time as probation is successfully
concluded.
5.2 Local 501 Employees on the Five-Step Pay Plan
5.2.1 New Employees. Employees who successfully complete their Initial
Probationary Period and are recommended for continued employment
are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step
(5.5%)effective on the first day of the pay period following completion of
the Initial Probationary Period. The Salary Review date for subsequent
annual reviews is established on the first day of a pay period following 25
weeks of continuous service and satisfactory complefion of probation.
Page 3
5.2.2 Annual Merit Increase. Employees who are not at the top of the salary
range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual
salary adjustment of up to one step(5.5%)on their Salary Review date,
provided their performance fully meets expectations.
5.2.3 Promotional Increase. Employees who earn a promotion are entilled to a
promotional increase of 5.5%, or to the base of the new range,
whichever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an
employee has not successfully completed their Promotional Probationary
Period on their Salary Review date,any adjustment resulting from that
annual review will be delayed unfit such time as the probationary period
is completed.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6A Sections 5.2.1, 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 do not apply to At-will Executive Management
Employees.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
8.1 Exhibit A
8.2 Fair Labor Standards Act
Page 4
Y m,m
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Administrative and Clerical
Exhibit A
Pry
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
NEB 44,809 58,182 Information Services Technician III Non-Exempt
NE7 42,301 55,195 Financial Technician Non-Exempt
NE7 42,301 55,195 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Senior Stomskeeper Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Information Services Technician II Non-Exempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Information Services Technician l Non-Exempl
NE4 33,800 4 ,027 Secretary Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Accounting Clark Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Office Aide Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Storeskeeper Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,750 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,750 Office Ape Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,750 Once Specialist Non-Exempt
NEi 23,250 30,164 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt
NE7 23,250 30,164 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt
vaee Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Engineering
Pey
Range Minimum Maximum ClassiReaBom FLEA SfaWe
NE9 49,001 63,611 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt
NE9 49.001 63,611 Engineering Associate Non-Exempt
NEB 44,809 58,182 Constmction Inspector Non-Exempt
NE7 42,301 55,195 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt
NE5 36,200 47,066 Engineering Aide 11 Non-Exempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Engineering Aide I Non-Exempt
V serxo
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Technical Services
P+Y
Range Minimun WWnun Classifications JFLSA Status
NE8 aa,809 58.182 Ei irunmental Specialist ll Nor-Exempt
NEB aa,809 58,182 Source Conirel Inspector ll Non-Exempt
NE8 aa,809 58.182 Senior laboratory Analyst NomExempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Environmental Specialist l Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50J55 Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Source Control Inspector I Non-Exempt
NEa 33,8D0 ",027 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt
a
Orange County Sanitation Cisbiet
Classifications By Employee Group
Confidential
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA SbWe
NE7 42,301 55,195 Executive Assistant It Non-Exempt
NEB 38,501 M,m Atlminisuative Assistant Nan-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Principal Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,750 O6ioe specialist Non-Exempt
V n"
Orange County Sanitation District
Classl0cations By Employee Group
Operations and Maintenance S01)
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Clasai0cations FLEA Stetrn
2015 47,285 58.883 Lead Electrical Technician Non-Exempt
2015 47.265 58.863 Lead lnslmme talion Technician Non-Exempt
2015_ 47,285 58.883 Lego Pump Pointer Operator NorvEzempt
2014 44,778 55,748 ElecWeal Technician II No Exempt
2014 44,TB 55,748 Instrumentation Technician ll Non-Exempt
2013 43.258 53,868 Lead Mechanic Non-Exempt
2013 43.258 53.868 Pump Power Operatof Non-Exempt
2013 43.258 53,888 Ledo Plant Operator Non-Exempt
a= 40d48 50.898 c-P9, -OF-- Non,Ewmpt
2012 41.812 52.060 Lead Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41.812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Machinist NortExempt
2011 39,304 48.949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt
2011 39,304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt
2010 39.040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt
2009 37.W9 47.285 Builder Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47.285 Elacm.1 Technician l Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt
2008 37.737 46,973 Plant Operator No Exempt
2007 34.505 42.969 Eleancal Maintenance Worker NonExempt
2007 34.505 42.969 Insbumentalion Maintenance Worker Non-Exempl
20W 34.505 42.969 Painter Non-Exempt
2007 34.505 42,969 Senior Maintenance Worker NonExempt
2007 34.505 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt
2006 33.590 41,812 Mechanic No Exempt
2005 31,348 39.040 Colledbn Facilities Worker II Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39,040 Maintenance Worker NonExempt
2004 30,938 38.509 Operator In Training Non-Exempt
2003 29,876 37,207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt
2002 29.490 30.700 Control Center Clark Non-Exempt
2001 24.184 30,093 Collection Facilities Worker l Non-Exempt
2000 22.882 21l Helper Non-Exempt
9
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Professional
R4R9e Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Sbtw
E14 $70.380 $99,600 Chief Scientist Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 Assistant to the General Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Senior Engineer Exempt
E12 $63.948 $90,468 Senior Scientist Exempt
E12 $63.948 $90,468 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt
Ell 560,828 SB6.064 Engineer Exempt
Ell $60.828 $86.064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt
E70 $57.852 $81.948 Seaetary to the Board of Directors Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt
E9 555,212 $78,156 Project Specialist Exempt
E9 555,212 $78,156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt
E9 $0.212 $78,158 Saenlist Exempt
E9 565.212 $78.156 Principal Accountant Exempt
E9 555,212 $78.156 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt
E9 555.212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt
Elf 552.500 $74.292 Associate Engineer 111 Exempt
ES $52,501) $74.292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt
EB $52.500 $74,292 Safety 8 Emergency Response Spedalist Exempt
E7 $50.054 $70.848 Programmer Analyst Exempt
E7 550.064 $70.848 Computer Hardware Specialist Exempt
E7 550.084 $70.848 Telecommunications Specialist Exempt
E7 $50.064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt
E7 $50.054 570,848 Contracts Administrator Exempt
ES $47,640 $07.392 Principal Laboratory B Research Analyst Exempt
ES $47.640 $67.392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt
E5 $45,395 $64.212 Associate Engineer 11 Exempt
ES $45.396 $64.212 Senior Accountant Exempt
E5 $45.396 564,212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt
ES $45,395 $64,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt
E5 $45,396 $64.212 Senior Emironmenbl Specialist Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61,236 Safety Representative Exempt
E4 543,248 $61.236 Programmer Exempt
E4 $43.248 $61,236 Senior Buyer Exempt
E3 541,136 $58.260 Associate Engineer I Exempt
E2 $39.252 $55,488 Contracts Specialist Exempt
E1 $37.294 $52,908 Accountant Exempt
E1 $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt
E1 $37.284 $52.908 Financial Analyst Exempt
E1 $37,284 $52.908 Management Analyst Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Supervisory
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Status
E14 $70,380 $99,600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt
E12 $63.948 $90,466 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,06l Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Contracts 8 Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Accounting Supeivisor Exempt
Eli $60,828 $86.064 Human Resources Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78,156 Operations Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 578,156 Source Control Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt
4ZW0 g
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Management
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA Stall
E16 677,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt
E16 $771688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt
E16 $77,668 $109,812 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Manager Exempt
E16 $77.688 $109.812 Laboratory Manager Exempt
US $77.688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt
E15 $73.956 $104.616 Controller Exempt
E15 $73,956 $104,616 Financial Manager Exempt
E75 573,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt
E75 $73.956 $104.616 Contracts&Purchasing Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt
E13 $57,128 594.932 Safety/Emergency Response Manager Exempt
E13 $57,128 $94.932 Maintenance Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Human Resources Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Operators Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technology Manager Exempt
v
Orange County Sanitation District
Clasal9callons By Employee Group
Executive Management
Pay
Rang. Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
E27 $154,596 $164.596 General Manager Exempt
E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Engineerirg Exempt
E19 $67,160 $139.980 Director of Operations&Maintenance Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Technical Services Exempt
E78 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt
E18 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Information Technology Exempt
E17 $75.876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Director of Communications Exempt
m.mo 9
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
"Non•ReoutaP Part Time
Pey
Range Mlnlmum Maximum Claeslfieatlona FLSA Statue
NEO 9.000 16.000 Intern Non-Exempt
Attachment 2
v
Orange County Policy Number: C20.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000
Subject: COMPENSATION Supersedes: November 17, 1999
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish and maintain uniform
compensation standards for all District employees.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 This policy applies to all District employees, as specified herein.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
4.0 POLICY
4.1 It is the policy of the District to apply uniform compensation standards.
The District Compensation Program provides for the establishment of a
wage and benefit structure through the Meet and Confer process that
allows District management to effectively compete in the labor market and
to retain present employees through an internally consistent measure of
relative job worth and personal merit.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 Exempt Employees
5.1.1 Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within
the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are
employed.
5.2 Non-exempt Employees
5.2.1 Non-exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate
within the salary range authorized for the classification in which
they are employed.
5.3
Y�•• @€.ii:iage-C�aesifisatieac
Page 1 of 5
9
5.3.1 e _ o.e'reS
5.3.1.1 An employee
shall be offered a salary at or
near the minimum of the range unless their level of
background, expertise or prior earnings indicates a need
for a salary greater than the minimum.
5.341.1.1 The determination of an appropriate salary
should also consider the relationship of the
employee's proposed salary to that of other
employees in the same classification and to
employees supervised, if any.
5.3.2 Probation
5.3.2.1 Except for"at-will" Executive Management employees,
employees ' serve a
Probationary Period of six months and receive a
comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that
period unless otherwise provided in an individual, written
employment agreement.
5.342.1.1 An employee who successfully completes
probation is eligible for a salary adjustment
according to the provisions of the Management
Performance Review Program which is in force
at the time of the review.
5.3.3 Reviews
5.3.3.1 An annual performance review is completed for all
according to
the provisions of the Management Performance Review
Program.
563.3.1.1 Performance-based salary adjustments for
these employees occur on the first day of the
first pay period in July.
5.3.3.1.2 If the employee's probation period has not
concluded as of July 1, the performance based
salary adjustment is deferred until the feNewipg
dulyapd�nill b�
ho � tnaec i ssY..� eTe
prorated based on date
of hire or promotion.
Page 2 of 5
V 5.3.4. Promotions
5.3.4.1. An employee ' who is
promoted will
normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the
range that is commensurate with their level of training
and expertise, prior earnings.
5.3.4.1.1. The promoted employee's salary should be in
an appropriate relationship to other employees
in the same classification and to employees
supervised.
5.3.4.1.2. The new salary will normally represent an
increase of least 5.5 percent.
5.3.4.1.3. If the employee's probation period has not
concluded as of July 1, the performance based
salary adjustment is deferred until the.feAewin
'Wy apd w.•"' employee.successfully,completes
probation i nd may be prorated based on date
of hire or promotion.
5.3.4.1.4. This section does not apply to"at-will"
Executive Management employees.
5.4 New Local 501 Employees
5.4.1 Probation
5.4.1.1 New employees
baF@@:AIR@ UR46 9th F thaR the 1404..AR An+l eU��na�nr"
Who
.successfully complete their Probationary Period and are
recommended for continued employment as regular
employees, are eligible for consideration of a salary
adjustment of up to one step(5.5%).
5.4.1.1.1 This adjustment is effective on the first day of
the pay period that follows the date of
completion of the Probationary Period (normally
26 weeks). The salary review date for
subsequent annual reviews is the first day of
the first pay period following 26 weeks of
continuous service and satisfactory completion
of probation.
5.4.1.1.2 The Salary Review date for subsequent annual
reviews is the first day of that pay period
following the date when probation was
successfully completed.
Page 3 of 5
5.4.2 Reviews o
5.4.2.1 An employee
who is not at the top of the salary range for their position is
eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of
up to one step (5.5%) on their Salary Review date,
provided their performance satisfactorily meets
expectations.
5.4.2.2 Annual performance reviews shall be completed on a form
provided by the Director of Human Resources.
5.4.3 Promotions
5.4.3.1 An employee who earns a promotion is entitled to a
promotional increase of at least 5.5%, or to the base of the
new range, which ever is greater, upon the effective date
of the promotion.
5.4.3.1.1 If an employee has not successfully completed
the promotional probationary period on their
salary review date, any adjustment resulting
from that annual review will be delayed until
such time as the probationary period is
completed.
5.4.3.1.2 A new salary review date is established for any
promotion to a classification not in the
Professional, Supervisory, Executive
Management and Management Group.
—55 Y-Rating
5.5.1 If the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a
lower paid classification as a result of a classification study, the
salary of the of the employee in that position shall remain
unchanged (Y-rated) according to the following table:
Years of Service Term of Y-rate
0- 3 One Year
4- 5 Two Years
6- 10 Three Years
11 -20 Four Years
21 or More Five Years
5.5.2 The Y-rate remains in effect until the salary range for the new
classification equals or exceeds the employee's Y-rated salary, or
until the tens of the Y-rate expires.
Page 4 of 5
u 5.5.2.1 If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls
within the range of the new classification, the employee
shall be placed ea-Nhe siep._ abm�Fn of the new
range nearest but not more than the Y-rated salary.
5.5.2.2 Employees become eligible for merit increases and range
adjustments when the Y-rate is no longer in effect.
5.5.2.3 An employee who requests a voluntary reduction is not
entitled to a Y-rate.
5.5.2.4 This section does not apply to "at-will" Executive
Management employees.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
6.1 The General Manager is authorized to offer up to three (3)weeks of
annual paid vacation to any prospective Executive Management
employee if, in the judgment of the General Manager, such offer is
necessary to attract the most qualified candidate.
6.1.1 The General Manager shall annually report all such appointments
to the Board Subcommittee having responsibility for personnel
matters.
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
(Attach salary range exhibits when available)
Page 5 of 5
Attachment 3
Orange County Policy Number: C30.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000
Subject: APPRAISAL OF Supersedes: October 22, 1997
PERFORMANCE
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for
the appraisal of employee performance.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
2.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational
unit.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
4.0 POLICY
4.1 It is the District's policy and the District's management philosophy that
establishing an effective level of communication that offers consistent and
continuing feedback on performance expectations and achievements will provide
an environment in which our employees can perform to the best of their abilities.
A performance appraisal program has been developed to provide a structure that
will support the accomplishment of that goal. Important principles of the program
include:
4.1.1 The District's overall mission is enhanced by establishing a connection
between that mission and individual employees'responsibilities and
objectives.
4.1.2 Recognizing employee strengths and identifying areas that may
represent opportunities for improvement will affect current performance
as well as enhance career potential.
4.1.3 Every individual has primary responsibility for their own performance and
development.
4.1.4 The key role of the supervisor is to support an employee's efforts to
maximize their own contribution and potential.
Page I oft
a
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 New employees will receive a performance appraisal at the close of their initial
Probationary period to determine their suitability for continued employment with
the District. An evaluation should also occur midway through the probationary
period to ensure that performance expectations have been property
communicated and established. This will also offer an opportunity,for both the
employee and the supervisor to more effectively evaluate the desirability of
continuing the employment relationship.
5.2 Employees who earn promotions should similarly receive a performance
appraisal at the conclusion of the promotional probationary period.
5.3 An annual performance appraisal will be completed with each employee prior to
their anniversary date. OCEA, Professional, Supervisory, Management and
Executive Management employees will receive a performance appraisal prior to
any salary adjustment or merit bonus.
6.0 EXCEPTIONS
7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
7.1 Supervisors and managers will be notified by the Human Resources Department
of all evaluations that must be completed at least 45 days in advance of the due
date
8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 2
ATTACHNEHT 4 -
Orange County Policy Number: D90.00
Sanitation District Effective Date: May 24, 2000 a
Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Supersedes: October 22, 1997
PROGRAM
Approved by:
1.0 PURPOSE
This program is designed to encourage self-development of District's employees by
providing qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational
courses at accredited colleges, universities, or other approved institutions approvw_by
the Huiium Resources and,Employge.1309elopment(HR.&ED)Division,provided that
such courses are primarily for the purpose of:
• increasing capabilities in Weis the employee's'.present positionsavithin the District
• preparing for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to
advance within the District
• updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to
the District
2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED
This policy applies to all.
District employees who have oompleted their Initial probationary period of employment
and work more than 19 hours per week This policy_does not apply to temporary
employees.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1- Qualifying Employees: mill 12F,4 11 t mo All Disbict employees who have
completed their initial probationary period of employment and work more than 19,
hours-per week
hgw. biweakly-pay paned.
34 Tuition Reimbursement:a program in which qualifying employees who
successfully complete District-approved courses,on their own time, at
accredited colleges, universities or other appreued Institutions approved.by the
HR,&ED DlQisiogf within the guidelines of this policy, can be reimbursed for
eligible expenses incurred.
chnnsips,
4.0 POLICY
The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete educationatcourses
that serve the mission and goals of the District at the sole determination ofthe District aP
liance with
aesreditetlJastitutieae in eom
P Sesues-1.C=RURRAS€k-MiA a11
t tha ded WI
Page I of 5
based upon the number of hours worked per
week as follows.
HOURS OF WORK PER WEEK PERCENT OF REIMBURSEMENT
0-19 NOTEUGIBLE-0%
20-29 50%
30-39 75%
40 100%
5.0 REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Employees can be reimbursed for the following:
• Specific,job-related associate, baccalaureate,and graduate degree
programs-courses,
• Specific,job-related courses through accredited colleges or universities
• Specific,job-related courses offered through an appreved institution of study
approved by the HR&ED Division
The Division Manager is responsible for determining whether or not the course is
'job-related.'
5.2 When an employee successfully completes a
course with a grade of "C"or better
S;2d2lQo44-and within the guidelines of this policy. the District will reimburse
the employee We cost o. for eligible expenses incurred, based on the number of
hours worked per week not to exceed$5,250
per calendar year.
Examples of eligible and ineligible expenses are:
Eligible Expenses Ineligible Expenses
• Tuition •---pplisatiGA fees
Mataria"Oes
• Registration fees Travel
• Laboratory fees Optional student fees
• Parking fees Doctoral dissertation fees
• Health fees • Masters thesis fees
• Application fees Supplemental textbook costs
• Required textbooks and Supplies and materials used
materials per the.course for the course and retained by
syllabus the employee after course
• Supplies required per the complefion(i.e., paper,
course syllabus not to pencils,notebooks,diskettes,
exceed$100.00 per etc.)
course Graduation or diploma fees
6.0 PROCEDURE
6.1 To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program,employees must submit a
completed Tuition Reimbursement Application(attachment A)and a copy of the
course description which includes the course cost, course start/end date,and number
of units for each course to.the HR&ED Division NO LATER THAN one dayprior
to the course start date:
• Tuition Reimbursement Applications received in the HR&ED Division on or
after the course start date will not be approved.
Page 2 of 5
6.2 'The HR&ED DiiedWeloodesignee)will sign completed applications. A'copy of the
approved application wilibe mailed interoffice to the employee to be re,,su6n eed._
upon cour5.e_Co_mpletion:
6.3 Incomplete applications will be returned to the'emptoyee'with explanatipn(s)
attached.
6A We Appwva4psecess
6.4.1
6.4.1.2
6.4.2
8 v gimp.
6.4.2.4
men apppqval'
6.5
6.5.1 Upon oourselcorripletion,the dmployee must complete and submit a
Requestfor Tuition Reimbursement(attachment B)along with(1)an
official record of the final grade,(2)Itemized receipts for eligible
expenses,(3)a copy of the course syllabus.(if requesting reimbursement
for required-textbooks, materials and/or supplies)and(4)a copy of the
original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to
the HR&,ED.Division wffhie 60 calendar days following the course end
date.
6.5.2
Page 3 of 5
ej. ig; 6 —
• Requests for Tuition Reimbursement received in the HR&ED
Division more than 60 days after the course end date will not be
approved.
6.5.3 The HR&.ED Manager(or designee)will sign completed requests.
Copies of the approved request will be mailed interoffice to the employee
and submitted to the Accounting Division for reimbursement.
6.5.4 Incomplete requests willbe returned to the employee with explanabon(s)
attached,
6.5.5
9e60aneatahi
Aivisierw
amplWYAR Ad gat All Pe MhwR@MAAt stat-A
6.5.5.4
AGR apl;FG-21,
7.0 EXCEPTIONS
--7-1 If an employee terminates employment or gives notice of termination prior to the
completion of a course, no reimbursement will be made.
7.2 This policy does not apply to temporary employees..
7.3 EmployAns will Ant ba
7.3 Reimbursement may be authorized whenever the employee's manager and HR
& ED Manager(or designee)determine that there is substantial benefit to be
derived by the District when an employee takes a course nc pre8carw that does
not meet the requirements of
s policy.
8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.1
Page 4 of 5
8.2 Tuition.Reimbu-3ementApplications received in the HR 8;ED Division on or ,
alter Me course start date all/not be approved.
8.3 Requests fohTuition Reimbursement received in the HR&ED Division more !
than 60 daysa/terthe course end deter-will not be approved,
8.4 All funds'received by an employee under this program within a twelve-month'
period prior to the date of voluntary_ termination of employment with the District
shall be,repaid by,the employee;
8.2 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee
meets the criteria specified in this policy.
9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS
9.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended.
9.2 Sections 127 and 132-J8 of the Internal Revenue Code.
9.3 Tuition Reimbursement Application.(attachrnem A)
9.4 Request for Tuition Reimbursement(aysphment B)
Page 5 of
Orange County Sanitation District
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATION
To participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program,the employee must complete and submit a Tuition Reimbursement Application(Nis
form)and a copy of the course description which Includes the come cost,course starllend date and number of units for each course to
the Human Resources and Employee Development(HR g ED)Division NO LATER THAN ore day prior to the course start date.
REQUESTS RECEIVED ON OR AFTER THE COURSE START DATE WILL NOT BE APPROVED.
I. Employee Name: Division: Extension:
2. Employment Status: ❑ Regular,full-time ❑ Part-time(fl of hours per week: )
❑ Temporary ❑ Probationary(probation ends[monthlyew]:_)
❑ Contract
3. Nativist Work Schedule(indicate days of week and hours ojwork):
4. Name and location(city,state)of College,University or Institution of Study:
5. Do you expect to receive any other type of Tuition Assistance? ❑YES ❑ NO
S. COURSE INFORMATION:
COURSE ESTIMATED START END START END
COURSE TITLE UNITS
NUMBER cons DATE DATE TIME TIME
7. Degree Program? ❑YES If yes,indicate type of degree and field of study
❑ NO If no,indicate reason for taking course
By signing this application, I understand that upon successful completion of the course indicated above, the District will
reimburse the associated costs in accordance with Policy D90.00 of the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual.
Should 1 voluntarily terminate my employment with the District, I agree to repay the District any funds received under this
program within the twelve-month period prior to the date of my voluntary termination. 1 expressly agree to repay the District one-
twelfth(1/12)of the amount owed every month for a total period of twelve(12)months commencing on the month following the
month of my voluntary termination. If the amount owed is less than $200.00, 1 expressly authorize the District to deduct the
entire amount due from my final paycheck.
Employee Signature: Date:
By signing this application,I agree that the course indicated above is mission specific and/or job related.
Division Manager's Approval Signature: Date:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
❑ Your application for reimbursement has NOT been approved. Explanation(s)attached.
❑ Your application for reimbursement has been APPROVED. A blank Request for Tuition Reimbursement form is attached.
HR g ED Director(or designee)Signature: Date:
ATTACHMENT A
Orange County Sanitation District
REQUEST FOR TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
Upon course completion, the employee must complete and submit a.Request for Tuition Reimbursement (this r
form) along with an official record of the final grade, itemized receipts for eligible expenses, a copy of the
course syllabus(if requesting reimbursement for required textbooks, materials or supplies) and a copy of the
original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application for each course to the Human Resources Employee
Development(HR& ED)Division within 60 calendar days following the course end date. LATE REQUESTS
WILL NOT BE APPROVED.
1. Employee Name: Division: Extension:
2. COURSE INFORMATION:
COURSE COURSE TITLE ACTUAL START END
NUMBER COSTS DATE DATE
3. ALL of the following eligible expense documents are attached:
❑Official Record of final grade(s)
❑ Receipt(s) for tuition and eligible fees
❑ A copy of the course syllabus(ifrequesting reimbursement for required textbooks,materials and/or supplies)
❑A copy of the original approved Tuition Reimbursement Application
4. 1 request reimbursement in the amount of$
By signing this request, I understand that the District will reimburse the associated costs for the course indicated
above in accordance with Policy D90.00 of the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual.
Should I voluntarily terminate my employment with the District, I agree to repay the District any funds received
under this program within the twelve-month period prior to the date of my voluntary termination. 1 expressly
agree to repay the District one-twelfth (1/12)of the amount owed every month for a total period of twelve(12)
months commencing on the month following the month of my voluntary termination. If the amount owed is
less than S200.00,I expressly authorize the District to deduct the entire amount due from my final paycheck.
Employee Signature: Date:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
❑ Your Tuition Reimbursement Request has NOT been approved. Explanation(s)allached.
❑ Your Tuition Reimbursement Request been APPROVED in the amount of$ and
forwarded to the Accounting Division on .reference#:
HR&ED Director(or designee)Signature: Date:
ATTACHMENT B
r
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ea.al Dtr.
SI10/00 5r14100
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number
FAHR003g 15fa1
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources
Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst
SUBJECT: CREATE THREE NEW CLASSIFICATIONS AND CHANGE THE
TITLE OF ONE CLASSIFICATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-10, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,
Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for:
(1) Create Accounting Supervisor classification at pay range El
($60,828-$86,064);
(2) Create Human Resources Supervisor classification at pay range
El ($60,828-$86-064);
(3) Create Lead Pump Power Operator at pay range 2015 ($47,285-
$58,883); and,
(4) Change the title of Senior Plant Operator to Lead Plant Operator.
SUMMARY
Frorn time to time, adjustments need to be made to a classification structure. As
new duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the
organization, new classifications must be added or titles must be changed. Staff
has identified four adjustments that need to be made to the classification
structure. The proposed structure adjustments will not result in any individual
salary increases. The recommended modifications are as follows:
1. An Accounting Supervisor classification be created at pay range
E11 ($60,828-$86,064). A supervisory level classification is
needed to supervise the day-to-day activities of the Accounts
Receivable staff. The average market rate for an Accounting
Supervisor, according to the 1999/2000 Watson Wyatt Data
Services Salary Survey, is $71,800. The midpoint, or market
reference point, of pay range El is $73,452. The El midpoint
is 2.3% above market, however, the El pay range midpoint is
$69,900 which is 2.7% below market. The El pay range was
chosen because it is closer to the actual market rate. Please
see the attached classification description, Attachment 1.
N w enuv •aa�a ne•.aa ae,nmv000emm�wM.Frwmnsao+i<m Nol.a:
a�i.a. a-xiHe Page 1
2. A Human Resources Supervisor classification be created at pay
range El ($60,828-$86,064). Currently, the Director of Human
Resources is the only supervisory/management level
classification in the Human Resources department. A
supervisory level classification is needed to supervise the day-
to-day activities of the Human Resources staff and to provide
technical support to other departments. The average market
rate for a Human Resources Supervisor, according to the
1999/2000 Watson Wyatt Data Services Salary Survey, is
$73,500. The midpoint, or market reference point, of pay range
El is $73,452. Please see the attached classification
description, Attachment 2.
3. A Lead Pump Power Operator classification be created at pay
range 2015 ($47,285-$58,883). The Senior Operations
Supervisor position in the Pump Power division was eliminated
earlier this year. The Pump Power division will move from
Operations to Maintenance later this year. A Lead level
classification is needed to ensure that an effective reporting
structure is maintained as the Central Generation division is
moved from Operations to Maintenance. The incumbent of the
Senior Operations Supervisor position earned an annual salary
of$74,836. This Lead position, therefore, reduces the payroll
cost from $74,836 to approximately$53,084 resulting in an
annual savings of$21,752. This classification is comparable in
duties and pay level to the Lead Electrical Technician and Lead
Instrumentation Technician classifications at pay range 2015
($47,285-$58,883). Please see the attached classification
description, Attachment 3.
4. Change the title of the Senior Plant Operator classification to
Lead Plant Operator to maintain consistency between the Plant
Operators Series and the Pump Power Operators Series (see
recommendation number 3 above). A pay range adjustment is
not requested as the duties and responsibilities of the
classification will remain the same. This action will change the
title only.
Human Resources Policy C10.00, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated
to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance
as Attachment 4.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
H\vry Ugendal& AgeMa Repft1 B 'd ggen aRlp ft .ryem 15W)tlx
Reis � Page 2
v
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-10
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN
RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That Exhibit "A° of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby
amended by amending Policy No. C10.00, Classifications, Positions, Salary
Ranges and Wages, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD
98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33
be made by Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
H:\wp.oa`ad min%B SVRe Ia ons\2000V'610.doo
No. 1205
Date: 5/24/00
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Accounting Supervisor
Distinguishing Characteristics
Under general supervision, provides specialized or general analysis support while supervising the
activities of various accounting functions such as Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Payroll,
General Ledger, etc. Performs accounting duties of a complex nature requiring advanced professional
experience, knowledge and competency in accounting theory and principles. Prepares difficult journal
entries and reconciliations. May be responsible for the maintenance of a complete set of accounting
records for a functional area. Provides interpretation of accounts, methods and records for
management.
Example of Duties
Supervises professional accounting staff and/or support staff involved in various accounting functions
such as AP, AR, Payroll, and General Ledger. Plans, schedules and reviews work of staff. Establishes
performance criteria and production requirements. Hires, trains, evaluates and disciplines staff.
Compiles data for and prepares budget estimates for the current year and recommendations for the
next year for the Joint Operating budget and the individual Revenue Area Operating budgets, taking
into consideration actual and estimated expenses.
Performs general ledger analyses, including analyses of quarterly expenses and explaining variance
from budget and prior year figures. Reconciles various asset, liability and expense accounts in the
General Ledger.
Oversees and administers the Revenue functions of the District including invoicing, collections, daily
cash deposits, the User Fee/Reconciliation Program and the Sewer Service Fee Program. Reviews
and approves any adjustments to original invoices. Oversees the reconciliation of Accounts
Receivable. Invoices Wastehauler charges, Industrial Use charges and Retiree Premium charges.
Administers the collections of delinquent accounts and administers permit violations.
Oversees and administers the Accounts Payable function ensuring that all invoices are paid in
accordance with board authority, policies and procedures.
Administers invoice reimbursement agreements to ensure that local agencies and others are billed for
the share of work completed in accordance with contracts.
Oversees the activities of the Payroll function, ensuring accuracy and timeliness of processing the
District's payroll.
Page 1 of 2
No. 1205
Date: 5/24100
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Accounting Supervisor
Minimum Qualifications
Bachelors Degree in Accounting or related field. Five years of experience in Accounting, including
accounts receivable, accounts payable, and payroll, preferably in a government environment. Must be
able to demonstrate the ability to supervise professional and support staff. Knowledge of accepted
governmental accounting theory, principles, and practices. Strong verbal and written communication
skills. Excellent analytical and computer skills, including proficiency with PC spreadsheet, database and
word processing software. Experience with JDEdwards World or OneWorld financial information system
is a plus.
License or Certificate Required
None
\badonWatallwp.dfa h IOlmckinleylClassDesmptionsTINANCE�Wgsupv.jD.doc
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 2
No. 8110
Date: 5/24100
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Human Resources Supervisor
Distinguishing Characteristics
This is the supervisory classification in the Human Resources Series. Incumbent assists the Director of
Human Resources in determining division objectives, supervises staff involved in Human Resources
administration, and provides technical support to other departments. Incumbent receives administrative
direction from the Director of Human Resources. Work is reviewed at the completion of assigned
projects to determine if overall results and objectives have been achieved.
Example of Duties
Supervises professional and support staff involved in the administration of Human Resources activities
including benefits, employee relations, human resources information system, employment and
employee services. Plans, schedules and reviews work of staff; establishes performance criteria and
production requirements; and hires, trains, evaluates and disciplines staff.
Develops, implements and administers Human Resources policies and procedures. Assists in the
development of short and long range Human Resources plans. Participates in the development of the
Human Resources department budget.
Develops and administers programs designed to establish and maintain effective employee relations
through the uniform and equitable application of District's policies and procedures. Investigates
employee relations issues and recommends appropriate actions to address and resolve these issues.
Counsels with and advises employees of available assistance in the treatment and resolution of job
related or personal problems. Participates in exit interviews and grievance procedures.
Supervises the administration activities, including maintenance of employee records; processing
employee status change forms; preparing reports and statistical summaries; and responding to credit
and reference inquiries on active and terminated employees.
Prepares reports, memorandum and correspondence and makes presentations to District employees,
including management, regarding Human Resources administration.
Page 1 of 2
No. B110
Date: 5/24/00
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Human Resources Supervisor
Minimum Qualifications
Bachelors Degree in Human Resources, related field, or equivalent experience. Five years of
experience designing, implementing and administering policies and procedures in the areas of
employee relations, employment and employee benefits. Must be able to demonstrate the ability to
supervise staff involved in the administration of Human Resources activities as well as the ability to
analyze and interpret Federal and State laws and regulations regarding Human Resources
management. Ability to prepare clear and concise documents regarding training programs and
communicate effectively, both orally and in writing.
License or Certificate Required
None.
H:\wp.dtaNMl OVnckinleytClaeBDeaenpuona W R%Mupv.ID.doo
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 3
n
No. 5120
Date: 524/00
' mm
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Lead Pump Power Operator
Distinguishing Characteristics
This is the senior level classification in the Pump Power Operator series. Incumbents report directly to
the Supervisor of Central Generation facilities. Incumbents are assigned to larger and more complex
duties and provide technical direction and training to less experienced personnel involved in the
operations, light maintenance and repair of the power plants and associated equipment and systems.
Includes responsibility for the generation of electrical power, light maintenance activities, and inspection
of the methane gas engine generator sets and auxiliary equipment. This position is also a floater
position and as such is subject to assignment to cover vacant shifts at both plants as needed. Work is
reviewed periodically for soundness of technical judgment and to determine if overall facility objectives
have been achieved.
Example of Duties
Provides technical direction including assessment of performance of Pump Power Operators involved in
the operation, inspection and light maintenance of power plant equipment and associated systems.
Reviews work orders for work to be performed, coordinates work among less experienced personnel
and provides technical and safety training to Pump Power Operators.
Generates and distributes 12,000 volt power throughout the wastewater treatment plant by operating
and maintaining internal combustion engines, steam turbine generators, chiller refrigeration and air
conditioning systems, energy steam systems and auxiliary support and safety equipment such as
pumps, compressors, fans, valves, filters, equipment drives and motors. Operates standby generators
to generate electrical power in emergency situations according to utility power.
Monitors and controls distribution of electrical power throughout the plant by either making manual
adjustments to equipment or by operating computer control systems designed to monitor trends and
start and stop engines, pumps and electrical switchgears. Monitors the M-SCADA software program
designed to control and monitor the electrical system.
Performs routine preventative maintenance on power generation equipment such as cleaning air filters,
adjustment packings, scheduling repairs and monitoring vibrations, chemicals and oil. May perform
emergency repairs on power generation equipment, as directed, or assist other divisions with repairs.
Operates switchgears and performs isolations, shut-downs, tag out and start-ups of power generation
equipment before and after testing, maintenance and emergency repairs.
Page 1 of 2
No. 5120
D
Date: 5/24/00
Revised:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Approved:
CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION
Title: Lead Pump Power Operator
Example of Duties (cont.)
Monitors, controls and records water, oil and air pressures, temperatures, flows, gas levels and test
results by reading meters, gauges, charts and instruments. Completes daily operating logs of routine
and unusual operating or maintenance conditions encountered and any repair work performed. Initiates
work orders, memos and requests for maintenance repairs. Gathers power and heat data for Monthly
Summary of Operations and prepares special reports as required.
Maintains work area to ensure safety and order, picks up , receives, stores and inventories supplies,
may operate electric crane to lift equipment and supplies.
Minimum Qualifications
Four years of experience in the operation and maintenance of electrical power generation equipment
such as gas engines, pumps and compressors, with at least two of those years at the Pump Power
Operator level. An advanced knowledge of electrical power generation principles, methods, tools and
equipment, safety procedures, testing procedures, chemicals and regulatory requirements. Know how
to perform basic mathematical calculations sufficient to record daily readings and know how to operate
test equipment such as computer combustion analyzer, computer vibration analyzer, dial indicator and
flow balance indicator. Ability to record data regarding power generation performance and
communicate, both orally and in writing. Must be willing to work shifts, weekends and holidays.
License or Certificate Required
Possession of a valid California class C driver's license.
H:Vwp.dtalhf5l0Mokinley0assDescdptonslOPSUead pump opemlor.jD.dcc
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 4
v snore
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Administrative and Clerical
ExhaltA
FPay
Range Minimum Maximum Classificatlons FLSA Statue
NE8 44,809 58,182 Information Services Technician 111 Non-Exempt
NE7 42,301 55,195 Financial Technician Non-Exempt
NE7 42,301 55,195 Graphics Coordinator Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Senior Sloreskeeper Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Graphics Services Assistant Non-Exempt
NEB 38.501 50,155 Information Services Technician II Non-Exempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Information Services Technician I Non-Exempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Secretary Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Senior OMcs Aide Non-Exempt
NE3 31,651 41,001 Stcreskeeper Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38.750 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
NE2 29.800 38,750 Office Aide Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,780 Office Specialist Non-Exempt
NE7 23,250 30.184 Storeskeeper Assistant Non-Exempt
NE7 23,250 30,164 Technical Services Assistant Non-Exempt
Orange County Sanitation Olatrict
Classification By Employee Group
Engineering
pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
NE9 49,001 63,611 Senior Construction Inspector Non-Exempt
NE9 49,001 63,611 Engineering Associate Non-Exempt
NES 44,809 88,182 Construction Inspector Nan-Exempt
NE7 42,301 65,195 Engineer Aide 111 Non-Exempt
NE5 38,200 47,066 Engineering Aide 11 Non-Exempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Engineering Aide l Nan-Exempt
r
Oconee County Sanitation Oistrict
Classifications By Employee Group
Technical Services
pay
Renee MInImYm Maximum Classifications FLSA Statue
NE8 44.808 58,182 Environmental Specialist II Non-Exempt
NE8 d4,808 58,102 Source Control Inspector ll Non-Exempt
NE8 44,808 58,182 Senior Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
NEB 36,501 50,155 Environmental Specialist I Non-Exempt
NEB 38,501 50,155 Laboratory Analyst Non-Exempt
NEB 38,501 50,155 Source Control Inspector l NomExempt
NE4 33,800 44,027 Source Control Technician Non-Exempt
Q
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Confidential
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Claselficatlone FLSA Status
NE7 42,301 55,195 Examine Assistant ll Nan-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,156 Administrative Assistant Non-Exempt
NEB 38.501 60,155 Human Resources Assistant Non-Exempt
NE6 38,501 50,155 Principal Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
NE2 29,800 38,750 Office Specialist Non-Exempt
tl sxm
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Operations and Maintenance(501(
Pay
Rartpe Mlnlmum Maximum Claeelficadons FLSA Status
2015 47.286 58,883 Lead Electrical Technician Nan-Exempt
2015 47,285 58.883 Lead Instrumentation Technician Non-Exempt
.... _.._ .
'201b _ 47,285 58,683 Lead Pump..Pointer Oparalor _ � Nor Exempt
2014 44778 55,749 Electrcal Technician It Non-Exempt
2014 44,778 55,748 Instrumentation Technician ll Non-Exempt
2013 43,258 53,868 Lead Mechanic Non-Exempt
2013 43.258 53,868 Pump Power Operator Non-Exempt
2013 43,258 53,888 Load Plant Operator Non-Exempt
9043 43,769 57,9ba SaabcPloaLOpawWr Moe-Bxaayl
2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52,060 Lead Worker Non-Exempt
2012 41,812 52.080 Machinist Non-Exempt
2011 39.304 48,949 Senior Mechanic Non-Exempt
2011 39.304 48,949 Welder Non-Exempt
2010 39.040 48,612 Equipment Operator Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Builder Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Electrical Technician l Non-Exempt
2009 37,979 47,285 Instrumentation Technician l Non-Exempt
2008 37,737 46,973 Plant Operator Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Electrical Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Instrumentation Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
2007 34,505 42,969 Painter Non-Exempt
2007 34.505 42,989 Senior Maintenance Worker Non-Exempt
20117 34,605 42,969 Senior Collection Facilities Worker Non-Exempt
2008 33.590 41,812 Mechanic Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39,040 Collection Facilities Worker ll Non-Exempt
2005 31,348 39.040 Maintenance Worker Non-
Exempt
2004 30,938 38,509 Operator In Training NonExsmpt
2003 29,875 37,207 Groundskeeper Non-Exempt
2002 29,490 38,700 Control Center Clark Non-Exempt
2001 24,184 30,093 Collection Facilities Worker I Non.Exempt
2000 22,882 28,502 Helper Non-Exempt
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Professional
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLSA Status
E14 $70.380 $99.600 Chief Scientist Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 Assistant to the General Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Senior Engineer Exempt
E12 $63.%B $90,468 Senior Scientist Exempt
E12 $63,946 $90,468 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86.064 Engineer Exempt
Ell 560,828 $86.064 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt
E10 $57.852 $81,948 Secretary to the Board of Directors Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt
E9 $65.212 $78,156 Principal Engineering Associate Exempt
E9 $55,212 $78.156 Project Specialist Exempt
E9 555,212 $78,156 Regulatory Specialist Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Scientist Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Principal Acccunlanl Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78,156 Senior Human Resources Analyst Exempt
Ell $52.500 $74.292 Associate Engineer III Exempt
Ell $52,600 $74,292 Principal Environmental Specialist Exempt
Ell $52.500 $74,292 Safety&Emergency Response Specialist Exempt
E7 $50,064 $70,848 Programmer Analyst Exempt
E7 550,064 $70.848 Computer Hardware Specialist Exempt
E7 550,064 $70.848 Telecommunications Specialist Exempt
E7 550,064 $70,848 Maintenance Planner Exempt
E7 $50.064 $70,848 Contracts Administrator Exempt
ES 547,640 $67,392 Principal Laboratory&Research Analyst Exempt
E6 $47,640 $67,392 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt
E5 $46,396 $64,212 Associate Engineer II Exempt
E5 545,396 $64.212 $enlor Accountant Exempt
E5 $45.396 $64.212 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt
E5 $45,396 $64,212 Human Resources Analyst Exempt
E5 545,396 $64,212 Senior Environmental Specialist Exempt
E4 $43,248 $61,236 Safety Representative Exempt
E4 $43,248 $61,236 Programmer Exempt
E4 $43,248 $61,236 Senior Buyer Exempt
E3 $41.136 558,260 Associate Engineer l Exempt
E2 $39.252 $55,486 contracts Specialist Exempt
El $37,294 $52,908 Accountant Exempt
E1 $37,284 $52,908 Buyer Exempt
E1 $37.284 $52,908 Financial Analyst Exempt
E1 $37,284 $52,908 Management Analyst Exempt
P zxum
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Supervisory
vay
Range Minimum Maximum Classifications FLEA SIatus
E14 $70,380 $99,600 Engineering Supervisor Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94.932 En ironmental Management Supervisor Exempt
E12 563,90 $90.468 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt
E71 S60,828 $86,a64 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt
E71 $60,828 $56,064 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
Ell $60,828 $86,064 Information Technology Supervisor Exempt
E71 $80,828 586,054 Contracts&Purchasing Supervisor Exempt
Ell 560,828 $116.064 Accounting Supervisor Exempt
E71 _ $60.828 $86.0_64 Human Resources Supernsar Exempt
_
Eg $55.212 $78,156 Maintenance Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $78.156 Operations Supervisor Exempt
E9 555.212 $78.156 Source Control Supervisor Exempt
E9 $55.212 $7$156 Supervising Construction Inspector Exempt
E9 555.212 $78,156 Warehouse Supervisor Exempt
e
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Management
Pay
Range Minimum Maximum Classigca0ons FLSA Sbtus
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Construction Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Engineering Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring Manager Exempt
E16 $77.688 $109,812 Laboratory Manager Exempt
E16 $77,688 $109,812 Source Control Manager Exempt
E15 $73,956 $104,616 Controller Exempt
E15 $73.956 $104.616 Financial Manager Exempt
EIS $73,956 $104,616 Plant Automation Manager Exempt
EIS $73.956 $104,616 Contracts 6 Purchasing Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Accounting Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Safety/Emergency Response Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94,932 Maintenance Manager Exempt
E13 $67.128 $94.932 Human Resources Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Operations Manager Exempt
E13 $67,128 $94,932 Information Technobgy Manager Exempt
m�
1
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
Executive Management
PoY
Rarga Minimum Maximum Clasai0ea8oru FLEA Status
E27 $154,596 $154,596 General Manager Exempt
E20 $95,676 $148,836 Assistant General Manager Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139.980 Director of Engineering Exempt
E19 $07,180 $139,980 Director of Operations B Maintenance Exempt
E19 $87,180 $139,980 Director of General Services Administration Exempt
E79 $87,180 $139,980 Director of Technical Services Exempt
E18 $85.992 $139,464 Director of Finance Exempt
E18 $85,992 $139.464 Director of Information Technology Exempt
E17 $76,876 $119,784 Director of Human Resources Exempt
E13 367,128 $94,932 Director of Communications Exempt
I
n�
Orange County Sanitation District
Classifications By Employee Group
"Nonitegular"Part Time
Pay
Range I Minimum Maximum Classifications IFLSA Status
NEO 9,000 16-000 Intem Non-Exempt
FAHRCOMMITTEE Mee0ngDate ToW.ofDir.
05/10/00 05/24/00
AGENDA REPORT hem Numtw Item Numh
FARR 41 15(h)
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE POLICY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy of maintaining the adopted Capital Facilities Capacity Charge rate and
structure until the Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Program is modified.
SUMMARY
The current Capital Facilities Capacity Charge structure was adopted as the culmination
of the Strategic Plan Rate Advisory Committee work in 1999. The structure is based
upon the Capital Investment Equalization Method of computing the rates. This method
has been used at the District since 1989 and uses the historical cost of facilities, the
projected additions to 2020, and the number of projected users at 2020.
Because two of the three factors used in this calculation are only officially updated
during Strategic Plan or Master Plan updates, staff is proposing that the Capital
Facilities Capacity Charge remain constant between Master Plan updates. These
updates have historically been completed every five years.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
Recompute the CFCC annually based upon the budgeted Capital Improvement
Program and follow the Proposition 218 notification and hearing process.
x�.ren Pd Ag. R@Wft Ca rd�a.wbm M15(h)�m
e«,wa._ aiase Page 1
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
None.
GGSAc
M AW. A.-I.newmnsoaxm 151n1 me
na,,.n arna9a Page 2
FAHR COMMITTEE NeeongDM Toga.urolr.
5/10/00 5/I4/W
AGENDA REPORT IMm Mmb 1tr NumbC
FAHRg K 15ri1
Orange County Sanitapon District
FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources
Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total contracts by
$200,000, from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and
approve funding in the amount of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01.
SUMMARY
Temporary services for the District are comprised of both capital and non-capital
projects. 15% of the temp needs are non-capital and 85% are capital. Additional
temporary staffing is required as a result of a peak in capital improvement projects
outlay during the five-year period through fiscal year 2004. This need for capital-related
temporary services is in addition to the need for services for daily operations at the
District. The need for temporary services to support the projected future capital
improvement program was discussed with and approved by the PDC Committee in April
1999 (see attached). The Temporary Employment Services Agenda Item, FAHR99-50,
approved by the FAHR Committee, estimated $1,000,000 per year cap on all temporary
employment services for the District, included capital as well as non-capital related
temporary services. We anticipate a $200,000 shortfall for this fiscal year. As the
capital improvement program continues to increase over the next four years, capital-
related temporary services for engineering, inspection, and support services will need to
be increased.
Based on the current capital-improvement programfoutlay schedule, the District will
need an additional $200,000 in temporary employment services for FY 99-00, including
non-capital related temporary employment services. For FY 00-01 this amount is
anticipated to increase to $2,402,000 and may reach a high of$3,870,000 FY 02-03.
The increase in capital-related resource needs is a result of capital projects that will
move from the design process to the construction phase. As the design work moves to
the construction phase, additional staff will be needed.
The cost of the capital-related temporary services will be paid by the capital project
budget. These costs do not impact the cost per million gallons. Staff is recommending
the above-described increases in Temporary Employment Services.
Staff recognizes that the degree of escalating costs associated with temporary contract
service-workers are unexpected, and previously not forecasted. For this reason, we will
NWgM�vpaMVNmN NpnG Aspem�mooewm Apsnp�RapabbyAUbm lfini da
Page 1
be conducting a cost analysis during the first half of FY 00-01 to accurately address the
advantage of regular employees verses contract service workers. _
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Year Capital I Non-Capital I Total
99—00 $ 970.000 $230 000 S7 200,000
00—01 2125 000 277,000 $2,402,000
01 —02 3.095 000 275,000 $3,370 000
02—03 3,595,000 275 000 $3 870 000
03—04 2,475,000 275,1300 $2 750,000
For information only, funding amounts to be proposed and approved in
subsequent Fiscal Years.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Discussion
The District's staff has recognized a significant need for contract-service workers due to
an increase in capital projects for the next five years. Our capital improvement project
budget is expected to increase from $70,000,000 today to $198,700,000 by fiscal year
2005. As information, this capital outlay represents over 180 various projects
throughout the treatment and collections facility. Most of these projects were identified
in the Strategic Plan adopted by the Board in 1999. Other projects are added to the CIP
that have been identified by staff and recommended by the EMT and the General
Manager. The projected capital outlay for fiscal year 2000-01 is $83,007,000.
In April 1999, the Engineering Department presented a program to the PDC Committee
that would provide contract-service worker resources to conduct the capital project
work. The proposed program consisted of hiring contract-engineering services during
the associated five-year peak capital outlay period. FAHR Item 99-50, in June 1999,
requested $1,000,000 in funding for temporary employment services which included the
proposed capital improvement contract engineering staff. Due to the fact that the staff
recommendation to FAHR included the contract engineering services staff for the
capital-related program, as well as non-capital related temporary services, the
$1.000,000 did not accurately reflect the needs of the District. The purpose of this
agenda item is to request additional funding to cover the shortage during the current
fiscal year for temporary services supporting the CIP, and to provide a forecast for
additional funds for the next three years. (These amounts will be subject to approval by
the board when the budget for each of those three years are adopted each June.)
M ny wupenearBnra Aeewa Pepoiuvom mare•geNa Pegxbb5[Mem•XI�
A...� , Page 2
As the capital improvement program activities ramp up, additional contract-services will
be required for project management, design, reviews, coordination, and inspection. For
example, as the current design projects move into construction, additional construction
engineers and inspectors must be obtained. Staff has estimated that additional contract
service-workers will ultimately be required for capital-related activities. These additional
temporary resources will be required in the Design, Process Engineering, Construction,
Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems and the Process
Control Integration Divisions.
The increase in capital outlay has impacted the 0&M Department as a result of
coordinating capital activities with the Engineering Department, reviewing construction
plans and specifications, developing facility process-control strategy for the new
projects, planning for construction sequencing and connections to existing facilities,
assisting with plant start-ups and shut-downs, visiting various collection and treatment
plant sites with consultants, attending meetings, arranging for sewer flow monitoring
and/or video taping as required by capital project needs, and coordination between
capital activities and ongoing treatment plant operations. In addition, the temporary
engineering resources will be used to ensure field staff safety, for locating utilities, and
for reviewing designs for operability and maintenance friendliness. The O&M
Department currently has one contract-engineer in the Process Engineering Division to
support the treatment plant capital improvement program and requires a second to
provide support for the collections system capital program.
The requirements for Information Technology related services and support continue to
rise above the Departments current resource level. Many of these requirements are
short-term or project oriented and can be met by augmenting permanent staff with
temporary contract support. This strategy gives Information Technology the flexibility to
manage its peak workloads associated with programming, analysis, project
management, and hardware/software support. Further, this strategy will provide
Information Technology with the temporary staff required to support the increased
volume of capital project work now going into design.
Funding
Funding for capital improvement contract service-workers is already recognized through
the particular capital project being worked on, and is budgeted by the particular capital
budget process. The temporary service-worker contracts for operating requirements
are budgeted within the Operating Fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Deny the request and put certain projects on hold.
2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Term Contracts to support a Division
through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees
placed on contracts with a speck end dale. These employees, during the duration
of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time
employees.
HM'V-SaOgnMa�BVN,�ppMa ReW'h1YJLV&vN�9e^4+ReW�GSNhm I'vn.trc
Page 3
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50
PDC Item Number PDC99-20
H My EhYp�ApS ReWr61]IW MAgm ReGuhNY0.Mm 150dw
R.. woes Page 4
FAHIRCOMMITTEE Meeting Dae I To Be.ofDtr.
s/s/9s wzwss
AGENDA REPORT hem Number Item Number
FAMRsyso
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-1 86) to
the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of
four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million:
General Agency
• Apple One
Technical Agencies
• Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel
• EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel
• DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel
• Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel
• Project Partners - Engineering Personnel
• Tek Systems - IT Personnel
• Lab Support - Laboratory personnel
2. Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary fines as they
become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines.
SUMMARY
The District has typically had short-term, low-volume temporary staffing needs and has
contracted with one or two agencies to fulfill them. However, temporary staffing
utilization is increasing with additional Engineering and IT projects. Since the increase
in temporary costs exceeds $100,000, Board approval is needed.
Three-quarters of the District's temporary labor needs are due to the increase in capital
projects for the next five years. The Engineering department has already obtained
approval from the Planning and Design Committee for the increase in the temporary
staffing budget and will continue to provide the PDC with regular updates.
Human Resources has interviewed each company listed in the recommendation and is
satisfied that they can meet administrative requirements of doing business with the
District. In the General Agency category, Apple One has agreed to a 40-50% markup
rate for general, clerical, and light industrial staffing. Other companies have been used
N lny.GhlaynM•�rW FFJ�nF/.Xgtp•A.•ol
•.;,.,. eim•e Page 1
in the past, but only Apple One has been able to consistently supply the District with
high quality temporary employees.
The technical firms work a little differently than the general temporary agencies. Instead
of negotiating a markup rate up front, the Engineering and IT departments plan to put
temporary staffing opportunities out to all of the qualified firms above and have them
compete against each other for each assignment. Those companies who find the most
qualified candidate at the lowest price will be selected on a case-by-case basis.
Instead of listing out all of the requirements that the temporary staffing firms need in
order to do business with the District, a copy of the Districts generic temporary services
contract is attached. Each company will need to sign it, or one like it, and agree to the
proper insurance and employment practices.
Because there may be other technical agencies we wish to use, and because the
posting of the jobs will be an openly competitive process, staff is asking for the authority
to enter into similar agreements with other agencies without having to return to the
Board to approve each agency.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not to exceed $1 million
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: J.O. Contractual Services and Capital
Improvement Budgets)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
Hire additional regular, full-time employees for an indefinite period or on a contractual
basis.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Sample generic Temporary Services Contract
X�ft, px�4'A a� MRUA
R. ear Page 2
PDC COMMITTEE "eomr Toee.orar.
oo/ar/es oeru ss
AGENDA REPORT eem Numbs ][Imn Numn
wcssm
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: Temporary Staffing Plan for Engineering Department
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
(1) Approve temporary staffing plan for the Engineering Department;
(2)Authorize staff to negotiate contracts with staffing firms for temporary staffing;
and (3) Delegate authority for temporary staffing contract oversight to the PDC
Committee.
SUMMARY
As an outcome of the Strategic Plan, a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
has been developed. The new CIP establishes a program of capital
improvements in the collection system and treatment plants to meet the needs of
the District through the year 2020, totaling $1.5 billion. The CIP includes
treatment plant capacity and improvement projects, collection system capacity
and relief projects, and rehabilitation projects in both the treatment plants and
collection system. The CIP also includes participation in Phase 1 of the
Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District, and
cooperative programs with our member cities and sanitary agencies including
projects to address inflow and infiltration reduction and water conservation.
Based on the planning assumptions used in the Strategic Plan and the projected
population and flow projections developed, a preliminary project implementation
schedule has been developed to meet those future needs of the District's service
area. The schedule calls for a substantial increase in the number of projects and
associated capital expenditures over the next four to six years.
The Engineering Department staffing levels have remained relatively stable over
the past few years, varying between 61 and 74 full-time equivalents (FTEs). The
CIP annual expenditures for collections system and treatment plant projects in
that same time frame have varied between $30 and $50 million. In comparison,
the annual expenditures associated with the new CIP for collections system and
treatment plant projects are expected to be between $75 and $100 million over
the next four to six years. Beyond six years, the projected levels of capital
expenditures will reduce to current levels. Due to this projected increase in the
number of projects and expenditures over the next four to six years, the current
staffing level in the Engineering Department will not be sufficient to allow the
planning, design, and implementation of the new CIP. To be able to address the
short-term staffing needs in the Engineering Department, a plan has been drafted
H:ao.aw.w,a.wocwoceeeennsw.m.a.mo w .ow,ac.�
w.a.,. Page 1
that will use temporary technical staffing. Contract project managers, engineers,
and construction inspectors will be used to supplement full-time staff on an as-
needed basis. The plan will be flexible, in that temporary staff with the necessary
skills can be brought on at the appropriate time, and can be released when the
assignment is over. It also provides management the ability to easily release
personnel that are not performing to expectations at any time. This will assure
that the program will remain cost-efficient and effective in getting the work
accomplished.
The proposed CIP project budgets include the costs for engineering,
administration, construction, and contingencies. All of the proposed project
budgets include estimates for engineering consultants, as well as the staff costs
to oversee the project design and construction, which would include the costs for
the temporary staff.
Several temporary staffing firms have been contacted to discuss the availability
of temporary technical staff and the expected costs. It appears that sufficient
resources with the required skills are available in the market place to meet our
needs. The temporary staffing firms attract people by offering a competitive
salary and a full benefit package, including dental and medical health coverage,
insurance, holiday pay, sick and vacation pay, as well as 401 K retirement saving
plans. The cost to the District to employ temporary staff approaches the cost of
hiring full-time employees. The Human Resources Department has begun
preliminary discussions with these firms to establish contract terms, salary
markups, and profit margins.
Staff is recommending that a program be established that would allow temporary
staffing to meet the needs of the Engineering Department in implementing the
new CIP. For the purpose of monitoring the program, Staff would bring to the
PDC Committee on a quarterly basis, and for the duration of the program, a
request-for expected staffing needs for the upcoming quarter, including required
technical disciplines, project assignments and budgets, as well as a history of the
past quarters.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
All budgets for proposed capital projects include estimated staff costs for project
management and support through design, construction, and startup, which would
cover the costs of temporary staff.
Haw s ,vim.NDIN c
a�: ermae Page 2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NIA
ALTERNATIVES
Hire permanent, full-time staff to support the proposed CIP or significantly cut
back the proposed CIP to match the existing staff capacity to do the work.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Treatment Plant and Collection System Graph
X M.haHOe^dVIX.V IXBxWPRS�B&$J.AI6nB Rdn.Ol01 W 0¢
Page 3
V
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
April 17, 2000, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on
April 17, 2000. Members of the Committee present were:
Director Norm Eckenrode Director Iry Pickier, Chair
Director Peer Swan -Absent Director Philip L. Anthony
Director Jan Debay Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr.
Staff and others in attendance were:
OCSD OCWD Others
Donald F. McIntyre Director Kelly Rowe Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
Blake Anderson William Mills Jr. Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
Dave Halverson Jill Everhart Bob Getter, Brown & Caldwell
Jim Harris Cindy Gehman Dave Murray, Brown & Caldwell
Wendy Sevenandl John Kennedy Rick Davis, NCG Porter Novell)
Michelle Tuchman Greg Leslie Fred Soroushian, CH2M Hill
Julia Norman Mary McDaniel, McDaniel Lambert
Ron Wldennuth John Collins, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley
1. Minutes of Previous Meeting
Upon motion by Director Debay, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, with
Director Pickier abstaining, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held March 20,
2000 were approved as mailed.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Report on Proiect Development Phase Issues: Development Information
Memorandum No. 5, Ultraviolet Disinfection
Senior engineer Greg Leslie introduced Bob Getter and Dave Murray of Brown and
Caldwell who gave a presentation on design information memorandum (DIM) 5,
Ultraviolet Disinfection. Dr. Leslie noted that the presentation gave information on
Brown & Caldwell's efforts so far in obtaining the best ultraviolet (UV) disinfection
system available for the GWR System. Issues that will be coming to Committee at a
later date will be procurement of the UV equipment and obtaining certification of the
equipment from the Department of Health Services.
GWR System Minutes
April 17, 2000
Page 2 of 4
It was noted that UV is a proven technology. Four experienced UV manufacturers have
been identified and prequalification of vendors is recommended. Recommendations of
in-vessel UV configuration and two options for lamp types were made.
Director Anthony requested a UV schematic. Dr. Leslie responded that a schematic
would be provided along with the Executive Summary of DIM #5.
2. Electrical Power Studies
OCSD Project Manager Wendy Sevenandt introduced Mr. Jim Harris from OCSD, as
the Power Study Project Manager for the electrical power studies. It was reported that
proposals for the electrical power studies were received from three consultants. Staff
ranked the proposals based upon technical merit and cost. The study includes two
parts, 1) cost of power evaluation and 2) power co-generation study. The power co-
generation project would require a supplement to the EIR. Both studies will be
complete in about 90 days after issuance of a task order. Staff recommends that Black
&Veatch be awarded a task order in an amount not to exceed $54,560.
Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried,
the Committee recommended issuance of a task order to Black & Veatch in an
amount not to exceed $54,560 for to complete the electrical power studies,
composed of: 1) a cost of power evaluation and 2) a power co-generation study.
3. Financial Study
Staff recommended that an independent financial study be sought to look at funding
options and that a Request for Proposals and Scope of Work be prepared with a final
review by the Committee.
Upon motion by Director Debay, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the
Committee authorized preparation by staff of a proposal and scope of work for a
financial study, cost estimate and recommendation(s) to complete the work and
return to the Committee for final consideration.
4. Selection of Vice-Chair
No Discussion.
Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried,
Director Eckenrode was selected as Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater
Replenishment System Cooperative Committee.
GWR System Minutes
` Apri117, 2000
Page 3 of 4
5. Status Report
Dr. Leslie reported on the following items:
1. Several things have occurred in the past month for the Bureau of Reclamation's
Record of Decision to be issued and allow federal funding to be released:
- The Final Availability of the EIS was published in the Federal Register on
March 23, 2000 and after 30 days the Record of Decision could be issued.
- Upon State review and concurrence with the Bureau of Reclamation, findings
of no adverse effect to the historic properties as result of the GWR System
construction, the EIS could be approved, which is necessary for the Record
of Decision to be issued.
- Staff was notified by Dennis Wolfe of the Bureau of Reclamation office in
Temecula, CA that the Feasibility Study, a requirement to receive federal
funds, also was approved.
2. The only monies received at this time have been $75,000 from the State Water
Resources Control Board for the planning grant and approximately 75% of the
research grant from the California Energy Commission.
3. OCWD Board of Directors will select their JCC alternate directors at their
April 19, 2000 meeting. Mr. McIntyre reported that the OCSD Chair would select
their alternates sometime this week.
4. Staff received a letter from the Regional Water Quality Control Board concerning
discharges into the Santa Ana River during storm events and has directed us to
submit an application for the discharge permit (NPDES). It will be a GWR
System application, but it has not been determined who will hold the permit
because of governance issues. It will require a future supplement to the EIR.
A video was shown by Rick Davis of NCG Porter Novelli from a CBS newscast
regarding "toilet to tap" from the DWP area of San Fernando Valley. Articles from the
Los Angeles Daily News were also distributed. Mr. Davis noted that the focus of the
public relations program would now be towards individual businesses and individual
elected officials as most civic and city groups have been covered.
Kellene Bum-Lucht of CDM reported that the following would come back to the
Committee for their review in the next few months:
1. Results of the loading rate and efficiency of the microfiltration units with
parameters and performance of the vendors in the Microfiltration Demonstration
Project.
2. Groundwater modeling is completed using both steady-state and dynamic
models with final locations of the wells.
3. Sizing for barrier pipeline from AWT to well sites.
GWR System Minutes
April 17,2000
Page 4 of 4
4. Report of optimization study of the GWR pipeline on the sizing of each of the
reaches to Kraemer basin. Options will be brought back to the Committee.
6. Directors Comments
Director Pickier reported that this would be Mr. McIntyre's last JCC meeting due to his
retirement from OCSD and also would be Dr. Leslie's last meeting as he is leaving
OCWD and returning to Australia.
7. General Managers Comments
Mr. Mills reported that the $37 million funding from the State Water Bond for the GWR
System would be received through SAWPA. SAWPA has worked out an agreement
with the State Board whereby SAWPA will administer to local agencies, which will
eliminate the need to return to the legislature for individual project approval and avoid
dealing with State Board staff for approval of projects. The governor's budget this year
has outlined $133 million to SAWPA to be spent over the next three years.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for May 15, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain
Valley.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS n ngDm T°ad.°fDin
s/z4M
AGENDA REPORT roam Numha Rem Numx
v
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Andrei loan, Project Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING OF DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND
PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 241
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Actions regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41:
a) Verbal report by Director of Engineering;
b) Verbal report of General Counsel;
c) Authorize Staff to receive and file written comments, if any, by the close of the
review period, May 31, 2000;
d) Open public hearing;
e) Close public hearing;
f) Discussion by Board; and
g) Continue to July 19, 2000 Regular Board Meeting for consideration of the final EIR.
SUMMARY
At the April 26, 2000 Board Meeting, the Board of Directors established the public
review period for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) between April 12, 2000 to
May 31, 2000, with a public hearing on May 24, 2000 at
7:00 p.m. The Draft EIR provides the public with complete disclosure of the project
environmental effects. The Draft EIR was mailed on April 12. 2000, to responsible
agencies, organizations and individuals that expressed an interest in the project. A total
of 130 draft EIR's were mailed. The public hearing was advertised in the Orange
County Register.
At the public hearing, Staff will present an overview of the project. K.S. Dunbar, our
environmental consultant, will discuss the EIR and the CEQA process. All comments
a«:.e: eaaae Page 1
received at the public hearing will be recorded and addressed in the Final EIR, along
with written comments received during the review period. The Final EIR is scheduled
for certification by the Board of Directors on July 19, 2000.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
R Page 2
6
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In September 1999, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)for the project was circulated for public review. Staff contacted individual
public agencies throughout Orange County by letter to inform them of the project.
Written comments were received from several agencies expressing concerns. All
verbal and written comments received were considered during the development of the
Administrative Draft EIR.
The Administrative Draft EIR was reviewed by Staff, and all comments were
incorporated in the Draft EIR, which was submitted for public review on
April 12, 2000.
ALTERNATIVES
None at this time.
CEOA FINDINGS
Board certification of the EIR is scheduled for July 19, 2000.
ATTACHMENTS
None
Al:jak
HAwp.@a�agenda\Board Agenda RepodsUWD Board Agenda Repods9 WDg1em 17.doc
Ra,+ , aWea Page 3
BOARD OF DIRECTORS PMetlngDare To BA.ofW
OS/29/gg
AGENDA REPORT IMM uumEo- imm
iefambr
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Mark Tomko, Project Manager
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 5-46
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Actions regarding approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of
the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46:
(a) Verbal report by Director of Engineering;
(b) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-11, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less than
Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46; Approving
Mitigation Measures; Adopting the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; Authorizing the Filing of a Notice
of Determination re said project; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program.
SUMMARY
The majority of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer replacement project is located in the Upper
Newport Bay Ecological Reserve and Nature Preserve. A Mitigated Negative
Declaration addressing the environmental impacts and mitigation measures for the
project was prepared and mailed to public agencies and other entities known to have an
interest in the project. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared
that describes the actions the District will take to minimize environmental impacts of the
project.
Staff recommends the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable.
R. � Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Back Bay Trunk Sewer consists of approximately 9,500 feet of 24-inch ductile iron
pipe located in Newport Beach near Jamboree Boulevard, primarily in Back Bay Drive
between the Newport Dunes Resort to a point that cuts through Big Canyon. In
September 1998, the pipe experienced small leaks due to corrosion of a portion of the
pipe, and approximately 300 feet of pipe was repaired. After further investigation, it was
determined that the pipeline needed to be rehabilitated and/or replaced to maintain the
structural integrity of the pipe.
Tran Consulting Engineers was awarded the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to
prepare the design and construction documents, and to assist the District in the process
of obtaining the necessary permits from the governing agencies such as California
Department of Fish and Game (Section 1601 Agreement); California Coastal
Commission; City of Newport Beach; and the Orange County Department of Public
Works.
Mr. Kris Lindstrom, a consultant for the Orange County Sanitation District, prepared an
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration according to the CEQA requirements.
The document was mailed to public agencies, and individuals or groups known to have
an interest in the environmental issues in the area. Recipients were invited to submit
their comments on or before May 15, 2000. Mr. Lindstrom reviewed all comments and
the Mitigated Negative Declaration was revised to address all concerns. Mr. Lindstrom
also developed a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that explains the actions
the District will take to minimize environmental impacts.
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEQA FINDINGS
An Initial Study and Environmental Assessment indicate that there are only a few
potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction.
Mitigation measures have been proposed to minimize identified potential environmental
impacts to an insignificant level. A list of mitigated measures is attached to the
Negative Declaration. The list of mitigated measures will be made part of the project
specifications. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was also prepared to
implement the mitigation measures.
Page 2
i
V
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. OCSD 00-11.
MT:jak:jo
\YadonWatal lwp.Ma\agendalBoard Agenda Reports@Ogg Board Agenda ReportiA MOWem IB.dot
R-tee: oMa Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-11
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE
REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT:
APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES: ADOPTING THE FINAL
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE
REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
RE SAID PROJECT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY
TRUNK SEWER PROJECT; APPROVING MITIGATION
MEASURES; ADOPTING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BACK BAY
TRUNK SEWER PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT; AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District
("District") is presently considering the adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project, and
WHEREAS, District is the Lead Agency for the preparation and
consideration of environmental documents for a Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the Project, which is consistent with the 1999 Strategic Plan Program
Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines,
and District's CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer
Project environmental impacts objectively, District prepared an Initial Study to
assess the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and
alternatives associated with the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer
Project; and,
WSBS-BRH:p1:0`W15=:p120752 1
WHEREAS, the Initial Study resulted in a determination that there
were less than significant impacts associated with the proposed project if
certain mitigation measures were implemented, therefore a Mitigated
Negative Declaration was prepared; and,
WHEREAS, District has consulted with other public agencies and the
general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration, as required by CEQA; and,
WHEREAS, District has objectively evaluated, received, and filed
comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, either in full or in summary, together
with the District's responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the
review, have been included in the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, said Final Mitigated Negative Declaration has been presented
to the members of the District's Board of Directors for review and consideration
prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Final Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Replacement of the Back Bay Trunk Sewer Project; and,
WHEREAS, District has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, designed to ensure that the approved mitigation measures are
implemented during project construction and operation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER:
Section 1: That changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the proposed project, before the proposed Negative
Declaration and Initial Study were released for public review, which avoid or
mitigate significant environmental effects to a point where clearly no significant
effect on the environment would occur, all identified in the Final Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
Section 2: That there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant impact on the environment.
Section 3: That the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects District's
independent judgment and analysis.
W585-BRKpi:05115M01120762 2
V
Section 4: The documents and other materials that constitute the
record of proceedings upon which the District's decision is based are located at
the Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California, 92708. The Custodian of these documents and other materials is
Mark Tomko, Project Manager.
Section 5: That the proposed project alternative consists of the
rehabilitation of a section of pipeline in Big Canyon (by use of a cured-in-place
liner) and two new parallel pipelines in Back Bay Drive. The proposed alternative
will create a number of potentially significant environmental effects that have
been identified in the Initial Study and were taken into account in selecting the
best alternative for achieving project objectives with minimal environmental
impacts.
Section 6: Potentially significant impacts identified in the Initial Study
and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration that will be mitigated to less-than-
significant levels by District are as follows:
A. That construction in environmentally sensitive areas will take
place between August 1, 2000 and February 15, 2001, to avoid the nesting
season of certain birds, including the Least Bell's Vireo and California Light-
Footed Clapper Rail.
B. That the existing pipeline in Big Canyon will be rehabilitated
in place by use of a liner, rather than replacing the pipeline to avoid disturbing
sensitive habitat.
C. That sewage spills will be avoided during construction by
implementation of a Spill Prevention Plan. The Plan will include use of temporary
by-pass pipelines, elevated risers, and stand-by emergency equipment, including
a tank truck and pumps.
D. That a Traffic Control Plan will be developed and included as
part of the District's Standard Plans and Specifications. Emergency vehicle
access will be provided via a locked gate accessible to all emergency service
agencies. Automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the area will be
temporarily prohibited to protect public safety and facilitate a more rapid
completion of the project via fencing and detour signs.
E. Temporary loss of use of a bicycle trail along the Back Bay
Drive during construction will be mitigated by relocating the bicycle trail during
construction on alternate routes.
F. Temporary visual impacts during pipeline construction will be
mitigated by minimizing construction time and post-construction restoration.
WSBS-BRR:pl:0511 5/0 011 20 76 2 3
4
G. Temporary construction noise will be mitigated by limiting
construction hours and informing the neighbors of construction activities.
H. Air emissions from equipment and vehicles will be mitigated
by continued compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District
requirements.
1. Disruption of roadways and bikeways during construction will
be mitigated through preparation of traffic control plans that maintain maximum
safe traffic access.
J. Disruption of utility service during excavation activities will be
mitigated by coordinating with the Underground Service Alert and local utilities,
developing plans for alternative services where needed, and re-routing of
facilities where necessary and at District's expense if a utility purveyor has prior
rights.
K. Increased emergency response times during project
construction will be mitigated by preparing traffic control plans prior to
construction and by notifying emergency services before construction schedules
are implemented.
L. Any disturbance of drainage facilities during project
construction and groundwater infiltration into open trenches and tunnels, will be
mitigated by scheduling sewer construction during dry months, coordinating with
the City of Newport Beach to protect underground facilities, and discharging
groundwater pursuant to the sewer collection system rather than surface waters
as allowed by District's NPDES Permit.
M. Disturbance of cultural or paleontological resources during
construction will be mitigated by halting work if unusual materials are found, and
then consulting qualified professionals to examine the materials, record findings,
and properly curate any significant artifacts discovered.
N. Dust generation and air pollutant emissions from
construction vehicles will be mitigated by using watering trucks, as necessary, to
control dust and keep streets free of dust and dirt, covering trucks and dirt piles,
using properly maintained construction equipment, and discontinuing
construction during first and second stage smog alerts to the extent feasible.
Section 7: That the Board of Directors adopts the Final Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
Section B: That the Board of Directors adopts the Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program.
WSSS-8RH:pJ:O5115/OO:p120762 4
v
Section 9: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file
the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the
requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 24, 2000.
Chair
ATTEST:
Board Secretary
WSBS-8RH:pj.M15=11 W762 5
BOARD OF DIRECTORSnRs om To aa.aGr.
o
AGENDA REPORT r��9m� IbRR srzarooNumb
9
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-13, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, Amending Ordinances OCSD-05 and OCSD-06, and Replacing Ordinance
No. OCSD-10.
SUMMARY
The FAHR Committee reviewed and recommended changes to the Ordinances
governing sanitary sewer service charges at their May meeting. These changes are
required to complete the April Board action to complete the consolidation of OCSD
Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, to adjust the rates for Source Control Permit
Users; and to correct the wastewater discharge parameters for nine categories of non-
residential users.
Because these charges are set by Ordinance, there is a two-step process to adoption.
Tonight's action is the first reading and introduction. The second reading and adoption
will take place at the June Board meeting.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The combined effect of all of the recommended changes will be to reduce annual
revenues by approximately $4.8 million. The reduction will be made up from "reserves."
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In 1997, the individual District Boards of Directors adopted multi-year Sewer Service
User Fee Rates. These rate schedules were confirmed during the consolidation
process through 2001-02. In April, the Directors voted to complete the consolidation by
combining the books of account for the various Revenue Areas, except RA7 and RA14,
and implementing a single sewer service charge.
X MpOC� WAYMCY Rgv .&uN/peMa R�`d`WMn I..
R. v Page 1
r
In order not to raise annual fees for any user above those previously adopted, the w
appropriate rates for 2000-01 are those previously adopted by RA3. These rates are r
based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year. (Rates for other types of
users are based upon flow and strength average assumptions are set forth in Ordinance
No. OCSD-5, and are discussed below.)
It is important to note that this action does not replace those higher rates that were
adopted in 1997; they are only set aside until they become appropriate rates for that
area. Setting aside, rather than rescinding these higher rates, will allow the District to
implement them at a later date, if appropriate, without repeating the Proposition 218
notification and hearing process that was conducted when the rate structure was
revised subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee process.
Because of other governance and service issues that remain unresolved, the Board
decided not to include Revenue Area 7 in this rate consolidation. Therefore, the
2000-01 rates for RA7 will be those that were previously adopted by District 7 and
confirmed by the 1998 consolidation. The base rate, the single family-residential rate
for 2000-01 will be $73 per year.
In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user
fee rate structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates
become based upon wastewater flow and strength per 1,000 square feet of
development, rather than the same flat rate for all non-residential users.
Since this rate structure was adopted, staff and consultants have been working together
to refine the quantity assumptions for the various non-residential use types. We have
also reviewed the user fee refund requests for accurate water use information.
The results of these efforts are shown in the attached exhibit. Wastewater generation
rates per 1,000 square feet are proposed to be decreased for financial buildings, office
buildings, stand-alone stores, industrial parks, steel buildings and mini warehouses.
These decreases would affect approximately 11,000 parcels.
Shopping centers are proposed to be divided into three major categories based upon
actual site visits. A low flow center would have a higher ratio of low end water users
such as stores, big box retailers and offices. The flow rate for this category would be
unchanged. An average flow shopping center would be a typical center with a well
diversified mix of tenants. A high flow center would include those with high ratios of
laundromats, grocery stores, restaurants, fitness centers, etc. Approximately 31% of
the shopping centers will be classified in each of the low and average categories, while
38% will be categorized as high flow. General Counsel has ruled these changes do not
require a Proposition 218 notice.
These proposed changes would affect approximately 12,000 of the non-residential
parcels in the District, or 35%. The net impact is a reduction of annual user fees of
approximately $3.7 million, or approximately .5% of total user fees. They are also
expected to reduce the refund requests to a trickle.
H wM .ft��W M1p1,W NaKblMOeeu!Ai F�VGOaIMn 10.
R« veove Page 2
General User Fees, those collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill, have
t been adopted through 2001-02. The fees collected from Class I and Class 11 Permit
users were not included in that action, nor are they included in the action described
above.
This action revises the rates (Flow, BOD, and SS) for these permit users so that they
are consistent with the rates used for the general user. The proposed rates are based
upon the single-family residential sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat
Flow, BOD and SS follows:
Domestic
Revenue Area Flow Per MG 'BOD Per 1 000# SS per 10009 Equivalent
1,2 3 5 6 11, 13 219.31 180.45 172.65 78.00
7 205.26 168.88 161.58 73.00
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. OCSD-13
2. Impact of Revised Flow Recommendations
H My MOH•R.00mriscwm,,.10Cx
Re eruae Page 3
.y
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-05 RE: CONTINUING AND
ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND
AMENDING TABLE C OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-06 RE: CLASS
I AND CLASS II INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGER
PERMITTEE CHARGES FOR USE, AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-10
The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby
FIND:
A. The District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-05,
effective September 25, 1996, which established sanitary sewer service charges
following Consolidation of former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California into the Orange County Sanitation
District, a single consolidated entity.
B. The Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinance
No. OCSD-06, as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-10, established charges for
use by Class I and Class It Permittees for discharge of industrial waste, as
authorized by law.
C. That Ordinance No. OCSD-05 adopted a schedule of annual sewer
services charges through Fiscal Year 2001-02 for all uses.
D. That the basic single family residential rate is an accurate reflection
of the cost to provide the service of wastewater collection, treatment, and
disposal.
E. The maximum rates adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-05 for 1999-
00, were based upon the best available financial and operational data. Recent
operational and financial data reaffirmed the basis for the establishment of the
rates and methodology for the charges at the time of enactment of Ordnance No.
OCSD-05, with certain exceptions for designated commercial and industrial
users, as described in Paragraph F below. The 1999-00 rates are reaffirmed as
the rate that does not exceed the actual cost to the District to provide the service,
and shall continue to serve as the maximum rate until such time as it is
determined that the cost of providing service exceeds those amounts which
would require an amending Ordinance to be adopted in accordance with all
requirements of law.
1
F. That records and data of operations confirm that the total discharge ➢
from convenience, neighborhood, and community shopping centers has
intensified and is of greater volume and density than originally calculated at the
time of adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, thus necessitating a change in the
percentage of the single family residential rate upon which the users in these
categories will be charged, in order to reflect a charge that is equal to the cost of
providing the service.
G. In furtherance of the adoption of a program to consolidate all
Revenue Areas and all fees to a uniform amount, District has determined it is in
the best interests of District and its users for the forthcoming year to use reserve
funds designated for other purposes to meet necessary operational expenses,
and to allow for setting of a lower rate for Fiscal Years 2000-01 and 2001-02.
H. That charges for use adopted by this Ordinance revise the rates for
each component factor(Flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD"), and
Suspended Solids ("SS")) for Class I and Class 11 industrial waste permit users, in
order to be consistent with the rates charged to non-industrial users.
I. That Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05 and OCSD-06 made numerous
findings of fact relative to the basis for the enactment of the annual sewer service
charges for residential, industrial, and commercial properties and uses.
J. That the findings set forth in Ordinance Nos. OCSD-05 and OCSD-
06 are reaffirmed, as applicable, and readopted herein.
K. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment
pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section
21080(b)(8), and the California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation
District does hereby ORDAIN.
Section 1: Ordinance No. OCSD-05 is hereby amended, as follows:
'Tables A and B of Ordinance No. OCSD-05 are hereby repealed
and replaced by Tables A.1.00 and B.1.00, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference."
Section 2: Table C of Ordinance No. OCSD-06 is hereby amended as
follows:
2
V
"TABLE C.1.00
Domestic
Revenue Ama Flow Per MG SOD Per 1,0000 SS Per 1,000# E uivalem
1,2,3,5,6,11,13 219.31 1 180.45 172.65 75.00
7 205.26 1 168.88 161.58 73.00"
Section 3: Ordinance No. OCSDA 0 is hereby repealed.
Section 4: If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the
Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or
circumstances, shall not be affected.
Section 5: The rates established by this Ordinance shall become
effective July 1, 2000.
Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation, as required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-
thirds of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District at a regular
meeting held June 28, 2000.
Chair, Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
Thomas L. Woodruff
District Counsel
3
TABLE A.1.00
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS
Single Family Residential Rates
1998.89 1999-2000 200D-01 2001-02
Adapted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR Adopted SFR
Revenue Area No. 1 $98.41 $110.04 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No.2 $74.00 $ T7.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No.3 $75.50 $ 77.00 $78.00 $00.00
Revenue Area No.5 $84.50 $ 96.75 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No.6 $79.00 $ 82.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No.7 $60.00 $ 66.00 $73.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 11 $80.00 $ 90.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 13 $100.00 $100.00 $78.00 $80.00
Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the
Irvine Ranch Water District
Multi-Family Residential Rates Per Unit
1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02
Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR Adopted MFR
Revenue Area No. 1 $67.49 $77.03 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No.2 $51.80 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No.3 $52.85 $53.90 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 5 $59.15 $67.73 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No.6 $55.30 $57.40 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No.7 $42.00 $46.20 $51.10 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 11 $56.00 $63.00 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 13 $70.00 $70.00 $54.60 $56.00
Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the
Irvine Ranch Water District
4
0
TABLE 8.1.00
ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit
1 Vacant Land Parcel 0%
5 Common Area Parcel 0%
6 'Hold' Parcel 0%
8 Equivalent to Vacant 0%
121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0%
122 Subsurface Parcels 0%
124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0%
125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0%
126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0%
201 Homeowners Exemption Add'm. 0%
666 Unassigned Vacant 0%
112 Steel Building 7%
113 Mini-Warehouse 7%
58 Nurseries (Plants) 10%
100 Drive-In Theater 10%
44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17%
71 Parking Garage 17%
72 Paved Parking Lot 17%
110 Warehouse—Single Tenant 17%
111 Warehouse—Multi Tenant 17%
115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17%
116 Truck Terminal 17%
33 Church Buildings 20%
94 Department Store 23%
95 Discount Store 23%
96 Unattached Single Store 23%
97 Strip Store 23%
74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27%
36 Financial Buildings 27%
40 Health Club 29%
107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 30%
108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 30%
109 Research and Development 30%
114 Industrial Park 30%
21 Automobile Dealership 41%
22 Auto Repair Shop 41%
5
TABLE B.1.00(Continued)
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit
23 Automotive Service 41%
24 Used Car Lot 41%
39 Golf Course 41%
57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41%
83 Automotive Service Station 41%
84 Marine Service Station 41%
86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41%
65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41%
66 Small Office Center 41%
67 Office Complex 41%
68 High Rise Office 41%
69 Converted Residence to Office 41%
7 Mobile Home 50%
55 Mobile Home Park 50%
37 Fraternal Buildings 51%
101 Unattached Theater 51%
26 Airport and Related Buildings 53%
45 Marinas 53%
89 Low Flow Shopping Center 53%
3 Two or More Residences 70%
10 Duplex Only 70%
11 Triplex Only 70%
12 04-Units Only 70%
13 5 to 16 Units 70%
14 17 to 25 Units 70%
15 - 26 to 40 Units Only 70%
16 41-99 Units Only 70%
17 100 or More Units 70%
18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70%
81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82%
82 Private Schools 82%
98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82%
99 Store with Office Upstairs 82%
118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82%
34 Dormitory 97%
42 Hospital 97%
43 Hotel 97%
56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97%
63 Low Rise Retirement Building 97%
64 High Rise Retirement Building 97%
0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100%
2 One Residence 100%
4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100%
85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100%
103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100%
104 Food Processing Plant 100%
6
b
TABLE B.1.00(Continued)
Percentage of SFR
Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit
105 Cold Storage Plant 100%
106 Factory 100%
119 Public Utility 100%
120 Water Mutual or Company 100%
888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100%
32 Cemetery & Related Buildings 101%
38 Funeral Home 101%
60 Nursing Home 102%
61 Convalescent Hospitals 102%
62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102%
28 Bowling Alleys 112%
92 Skating Rinks 112%
50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stores 124%
51 Small Medical Center 124%
52 Medical Center Complex 124%
53 High Rise Medical 124%
54 Converted Residence to Medical 124%
91 Regional Shopping Center 138%
20 Amusement Parks 144%
35 Entertainment Center 144%
73 Recreation 144%
30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151%
47 Supermarket 151%
48 Convenience Market 151%
19 SFR with 1 or 2 Rental Units 170%
88 High Flow Shopping Center 226%
Percentage of SFR Per 1,000 SF or Unit
Assessor
Use Effective Effective Effective
Code Description FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01
76 Restaurant—Take Out 148% 224% 300%
77 Restaurant—Coffee Shop 248% 424% 600%
78 Restaurant— Dinner House 248% 424% 600%
79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 248% 424% 600%
29 Conventional Car Wash 313% 555% 796.%
NOTE: Multiply the applicable percentage figure by the Table A.1.00 Single
Family Residential Rate for the applicable Revenue Area, in order to
determine the annual sewer service charge for the commercial or
industrial user.
7
05/16/2000 5:21 PM
Impact of CRTG Flow Recommendations
Code Description Ong Flow CRTG Flow Ong % CRTG% Ong $ CRTG $ Increase Parcels
MGD MGD To SFR To SFR $ 80.00 $ 80.00 (Decrease)
36 Financial Buildings 99 65 41% 27% $80,882 $53,264 ($27,618) 309
65,66.67,68,69 Otfce Buildings 198 100 82% 41% 3.894,846 1,947,423 (1,947.423) 4,354
94,95,96,97 Stores 99 55 41% 23% 592,792 332,542 (260,250) 2,666
107,108,109,114 Industrial Parks 253 75 100% 30% 5,531,341 1,659,402 (3,871,939) 3,330
112 Steel Buildings 25 10 17% 7% 17,974 7,401 (10,573) 149
113 Mini Warehouses 25 10 17% 7% 32,220 13,267 (18,953) 138
88 Low Flow Shop Ctr 79 79 53% 53% 409,123 409,123 0 333
89 Avg Flow Shop Ctr 79 200 53% 139% 441,704 1,239,281 797,577 327
90 High Flow Shop Ctr 79 325 53% 226% 475,914 2,144,759 1,668,845 420
Total $11,476,796 $7.806,462 ($3,670,334) 12,026
G?exce1.dtaV1n12101aUeed141tl d mpytSTRATPLNUIse Fee CRTG CRTG Cale
FINANCIAL &
OPERATIONAL
REPORT
a f1
Third Quarter
Ended
March 31 , 2000
os
� h 4 � •1
N
XF
Orange County Sanitation District, California
Table of Contents
" Section 1 - Overview........................................................................................................1
r Financial Report-
Section 2 - Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department.......................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge............................................................2
., Comparison of Expenses by Department...................................................................3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category.................................................................4
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item.................................................5
Summary of Expenses by Line Item...........................................................................6
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process ...........................................................8
Chartof Staffing Trends .............................................................................................9
r
Section 3 -Capital Improvement Program Review
r Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source........................1
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year..........2
r Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life.............7
Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Area
r
Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas ........................................................1
Revenue Area No. 1 Budget Review..........................................................................2
.. Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review..........................................................................3
Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review..........................................................................4
Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review..........................................................................5
Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review..........................................................................6
Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review..........................................................................7
Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review .......................................................................8
Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review........................................................................9
Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review......................................................................10
Section 5 - Self Insurance Budget Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review .......................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review...........................................................2
r Operational Report
Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1
r
r
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report L
L
i �
u .
L
11 �
r
J
This Page Left Intentionally Blank L
L
I :
u
L
ii
4
II
111
I
L.
L
L
L
u
r
Overview
Third Ouarter Financial & Operational Report
March 31,2000
r
The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1999-00 third quarter
` comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial
and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the
Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial
condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and
providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1999-00 performance
objectives as established in the 1999-00 adopted budget. A summary of the sections
contained within this report is provided below.
Joint Operating& Working Capital Budget Review.At March 31, 2000, 74.57
r percent, or$32,810,000 of the 1999-00 net joint operating budget of$44.0 million has
been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 3.50 percent, or$1,109,000 from the
same period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2000 is $495.41 based on flows of 66.2
r billion gallons, or 240.83 million gallons per day. This is$13.17, or 2.73 percent above
the budgeted cost per million gallons of$482.24. This overage is due to the shortfall in
flows which are 3.7 percent below the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day.
This is offset slightly by net expenses being .57 percent, or$190,000 lower than budget
through March 31.
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 2000 include:
• Salaries. Wages and Benefits— Net Joint Operating personnel costs were at 77.33
percent of budget through the third quarter while staffing was 21 full-time
equivalents (FTE's), or 4.0 percent below the total 519 FTE's approved in the 1999-
00 budget. Personnel costs were higher than anticipated through the third quarter
r due to (1) the distribution of annual bonuses for department heads and managers in
the first quarter, (2)the early retirement and associated accrual leave payoff for
several employees, (3) overtime costs associated with the Huntington Beach
Closure Project, and (4)the distribution of annual leave payoffs. Net joint operating
personnel costs are expected to be near budget by year-end.
�+ • Retirement—Through the third quarter, costs for retirement were at 81.27 percent,
or$1,575,400 of the $1,938,600 budget due to the fact that bonuses, benefit option
plan payments, and leave payoffs are now subject to the Orange County
Employees' Retirement System employer and employee contributions. This was not
taken into consideration at the time the budget was submitted.
r
r
Section 1 - Page 1
r
L
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
• Notices & Ads— Expenses for notices and ads were at $30,800, or 125.15 percent 6'
of the $24,600 budget, due to searches to fill several vacant positions.
• Lab Chemicals & Supplies—Through the third quarter, lab chemical and supplies
costs totaled $348,800, or 104.42 percent of the $334,000 budget. These costs are
high because of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the first
quarter due to the Huntington Beach Closure Project. "r
• Groundskeeping & Janitorial—Groundskeeping and janitorial costs totaled
$270,900, or 103.38 percent of budget through March 31, due to unanticipated costs
of $44,700 in tree pruning, $41,400 in weed abatement, and $10,600 in repair of —
asphalt at Plant Number 2. L
• Solids Removal — During the third quarter, Kern County implemented a road tax,
and Tule Ranch increased rates by $2 per wet ton. Consequently, costs for solids 6W
removal are at 85.36 percent of the $4,293,500 budget through March 31.
• Outside Lab Services—Through March 31, costs for outside lab services totaled ,
$140,900, or 94.76 percent of the $148,700 budget. These costs are high because
of additional testing performed on ocean samples during the first quarter due to the
Huntington Beach Closure Project. L
• Professional Services—Audit &Accounting—Through the third quarter, audit and
accounting expenses of$45,100 are at 96.37 percent of the $46,800 budget due to
the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs during the first and
second quarters of each year.
r
• Research —At March 31, research costs of$337,500 are only at 51.49 percent of
the $655,500 budget due to the cancellation of a$40,000 W ERF grant project and
to the timing of when annual fees for participation in research organizations are 6'
paid. The majority of these fees are paid in the fourth quarter of each year.
• Service Maintenance Agreements— Expenses of $511,400, or 28.08 percent of the
service maintenance agreement budget of$1,821,300, are low due to the timing of
when these agreements are renewed. Staff expects to approximate budget by year-
end.
• Diesel for Generators—Through March 31, diesel costs for running generators L
equal the amount budgeted for the year of$10,000. This is due to the use of diesel
fuel for pumps at the beach during the Huntington Beach Closure Project.
• Natural Gas—At March 31, natural gas expense totaled $959,500, or 92.93 percent
of the $1,032,500 budget, primarily as a result of an increase in the cost per unit of
usage since the budget was adopted.
V
Section 1 - Page 2
u
Overview
• Other Non-operating Expense —At March 31, other non-operating expenses of
$50,100 was at 105.65 percent of the $47,400 budget. This overage is due to costs
of $14,000 incurred during the third quarter for an expert panel review of the
Huntington Beach Closure issue.
Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results
With Year-End Actuals (Budget)
s
Last Five Years
550
r
501.00 502.13
093.65 403.65 4bb.41
500 461.1 p6.56
� 465.]5
_ 1
450
4011-'
350 '
oc.oF 9aSZ e]-Ga OA.00 o0.nn
3rd Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Year 3rtl Annual
01, end Otr end at, end Otr end Orr audcet
As demonstrated in the graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the third quarter
has been within three percent of the year-end actual for the past four years. The cost
comparison for 1999-00 is consistent with this trend as staff projects the year-end cost
per million gallons to approximate $492.25. This projected amount exceeds budget by
two percent due to lower than anticipated flows.
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter, as budgeted for 1999-00, and
as actually incurred through the third quarter of 1998-99. All three charts are quite
similar showing little change among the current year third quarter actual, current year
budget, and prior year third quarter actual.
Section 1 - Page 3
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
I
More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 r
provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third
quarter for the last five years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses
by department for March 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000; Section 2 — Page 4 provides a
summary of expenses by major category through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2
— Page 5 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through March
31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2— pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line r
item through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of
expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2000 and 1999; Section 2 — Page 9
provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, Y°
actual positions filled, and vacant positions.
Capital Outlay Review. as
r
S700,000,000
S90,000,000
$80.000,000 r
570,000,000 —
Sao,DOD,a00
r
$so,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000 L,
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
so itt Na
03/31/00 Actual Projected 1999-00 Originally Estimated
Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- 1999-00 Capital
$41,691,800 $60,853,400 Outlay- $92,401,500 ♦m
As depicted by the chart above, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $41,691,800,
or 45.12 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1999-00 as of March 31, "
2000. Costs are low through the third quarter as many projects for 1999-00 are still in
the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are
expected to be $60.9 million or 65.9 percent of budget at year-end.
Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital r
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each Revenue Area's share of the total amount of capital outlay
requirements incurred through March 31.
For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 6 provide a summary of the
construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 7
through 11 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over
the project life.
r
Section 1 - Page 4
r
Overview
`+ Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At March 31, 2000, revenues from all Revenue
Areas totaled $90.67 million, or 65.08 percent of budget. Tax allocations and
subvention revenues, budgeted at$32.86 million, are at 68.38 percent of budget, or
$22.5 million, and Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual
Revenue Areas, budgeted at$74.3 million, is at 67.24 percent of budget, or$49.96
million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter
because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts
that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the
District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. Interest revenues, budgeted at $26.78
million, are only at $12.88 million, or 48.11 percent, due to lower than expected interest
rates on investments and the impact of"marking to market" in this environment.
Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at$5.2 million, are at 103.3 percent, or$5.4
million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities.
Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $141.37 million, or 75.42 percent of
budget through March 31, 2000. The costs related to capital improvement projects
(share of Joint Works Treatment Plant and Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction)
are only at $41.69 million, or 45.12 percent of budget, because many projects are still in
the design phase or have experienced various delays, as was previously explained in
r
the Capital Outlay Section.
Conversely, revenue area operating and other expenses, budgeted at $9.4 million, are
r at 314.0 percent of budget, or$29.4 million, due to the one-time write-off of Orange
County Investment Pool losses of $22,782,400. COP/Bond Retirement and Interest
expense, budgeted at $41.7 million, are high at $37.5 million, or 89.9 percent of budget,
because the majority of principal debt service payments are made at the beginning of
the fiscal year.
Self-Insurance Budget Reviews:The District is self-insured for Workers'
Compensation and for General Liability claims in excess of $25 million. Separate fund
accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing
these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area
contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid,
claims administration, and excess loss policies.
r
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $725,200, or 63.9 percent of budget, at
March 31, while total expenses were $1,203,500, or 107.3 percent of budget due to
higher than anticipated claim payments and the one-time write-off of Orange County
Investment Pool losses of$212,300.
.. operational Review:The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) pertains
to the status of Performance Objectives as of March 31, 2000.
r
r
Section 1 - Page 5
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and �
incorporated into the 1999-00 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance
measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured,
achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to
further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's
critical goals for 1999-00, workplans were also developed at the Division level.
At March 31, 2000, 75 percent of the District's performance objectives and 63 percent -
of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end.
u
4,1
V
u
u
L
i
�i
u
w
Section 1 - Page 6 -
v'
ass
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
r Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
O&M
r Engineerng 56%
-1%
GSA
r 10%
Finance
5%
r
Comm.
1%
ass Into.Tech
6%
Exec,Mgmt. Tech.Svcs. HIR
2% 17% 2%
r
Departmental Gallonage Charges
1999-00 Budget
r
Engineering
0% O 8 M
569e
see GSA
i(Ylx
sr Finance
6%
Comm
1%
r
Into.Tech.
5%
Exec.Mgmt
r 3% Tech.Svc,. HIR
17% 2%
r Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1999
Engineerng
r 1% OSM
GSA 59%
10%
r
Finance
6%
r Comm.
1%
Into.Tech.
4%
r Exec.Mgmt.
2% Tech.Svc,. HIR
15% 2%
Section 2— Page 1
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, L
03131/96 W131197 03131/98 ON31199 1999-00 0131= V
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual
Flow In Million Gallons 65,075.42- 67.13e 69,582,72 66,521.09 91,240.89 88.22800 1-I
Flow In Mllllon Gellona oar Dev 237 W 246.03 253.95 242.76 2W.00 240.83 Yal
General Manager's Department $ 848 a 11.55 8 9.59 It 9.33 S 13.08 $ 12.18
Communications 5.41 0,16 5.33 5.10 6.27 6.61 1
Human Resources Department 6.29 11.61 10.76 9.03 9.44 10.16 v
Finance Department
Finance Administration 20.09 18.52 18.23 14.71 18.29 111.44
Accounting 9.29 10.25 10.01 10.87 8.24 Ilse
Purchsaing&Warehousing 647 6.78 5.46 6.56 6.91 8.93
Total 35.85 35.55 31.70 32.13 31.44 30.25
General Services Department I j
General Services Administration 5.61 6.38 4.35 4.64 3.31 3.89 I�
Collection Facilities Maintenance 1.68 1.38 1.80 5.07 3.82 7.78
Plerd Fatllfties Meammance 35.34 38.38 35.96 45.89 43.93 41.69
Total 43.61 48.12 4211 55.80 51.06 53.W
Information Technology Department
1.T.Administration - 1.91 6.19 7.51 -
Customer&Network Support 15.34 10.69 14.00 8.72 11.76 17.91 j
Programing&Database - 2.94 3.10 5.65 1a1
Process Cbl Integration 3.33 &82 4.92 3.89 0.97
Total 1534 14.02 17.82 18.49 24.76 32.04
operations&Maintenance Department list
Opns&Maim. Administration 2.82 1.95 l38 2.08 3.33 2.60
O&M Process Engineering 7.95 7.99 6.92 4.17 6.17 9.39 Plant No.No. 1 Operations 79.43 75.85 67.95 72.27 63.62 72.88
Plant No.2 Operations 124.16 100.93 93.84 98.21 94.91 103.55 �(
Mechanics]Maintenance 54.04 45.59 49.04 60.59 48.06 48.46
Electrical&Instrumenta l=Maintenance 41.57 41.74 40.62 47.62 49.42 47.33 }
Mr Quality&Special Projects 0.22 4.14 6.55 6.13 28.82 11.28 Ild!
Central Generation 24.06 25.78 28.55 27.65 7.46 20.23
Total 340.55 203.97 303.86 308.72 300.58 324.71
Technical services Department V Technical Services Administration 5.53 6.56 7.36 7.11 7.29 Ve
Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 40.18 41.39 35.86 31.14 40.76 42.41
Emironmemal Sciences Laboratory 37.10 31.03 30.35 31.37 34.49 38.97
Source Control 3.41 4.13 4.88 2.70 2.75 (1.18) LI
Solely&Emergency Response 2.76 5.12 3.93 3.60 6.53 also
Total 89.28 55.23 83.37 75.92 91.82 8212 _
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 0.02 0.01 - 0.20 0.05 (0.99) 'w1
Planning B Design 1.10 1.06 1.21 0.60 0.03 (1.64)
Construction Management 0.49 1.20 4.19 1.07 (6.06)
Total 1.12 1.58 2.41 4.90 2.08 (7.88) I
Total Joint Operating Expenses 50.93 518 L
.99 508.95 519.31 630.41 553.45
Less: Revenues (44.13) (37.82) (5880) (4276) (48.17) (58.04) -
NO Joint Operating Expenses $ 501.80 a 481.17 S 450.15 $ 476.88 9 482.24 $ 495.41 60
hs
Section 2-Page 2
U
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses by Department
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
1999-00
r
(IMM8 03131199 year to Data Budge%
Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 0I131/00 Real'vetl
General Managefs Daparhnent $ 667,489 $ 620,562 $ 1275,300 $ 8D6,833 63.27%
„ry Communifatlons 371,178 339,032 481,000 430,840 8&57%
Human Resources DeparNrent 748.481 501,007 881,700 673.104 78.11%
Finance Department
Finance Administration 1.129,348 978,585 1.486,500 558,797 37.59%
Accounting 696,197 722,793 751,700 852.958 113,17%
Purchasing&Warehousing 380.197 435.859 630,400 591.396 93.81%
Total 2,205,742 2.137,237 2,868,600 2,003.151 6983%
r General Services Depamnent
General Services Administraion 302,408 308,582 301.900 257,854 85.34%
Collection Facilities Maintenance 125.170 337257 348,400 515.152 147.86%
Plant Facilities Maintenance 2,502,271 3,052,546 41,008,911 2,761.123 66.87%
r Total 2,929,849 3,698,385 4,659200 3,533,929 75.85%
Information Technology Department
I.T.Administration - 126.963 565,000 497,104 87.96%
r Customer&Network Support 974.195 5a0,134 1,075,OD0 1.186252 110.35%
Programing&Database - 196247 282,400 374292 132.54%
Process CM Integration 265.512 327550 336,400 64,408 19.15%
r Total 1239,707 1229,894 2,268,800 2,122,056 93.95%
Operations&Maintenance Depannumt
Dons&Maim Adminisnetiun 165,639 138257 303,750 171,952 55.61%
O&M Process Engineering 481,502 277,191 562,550 621.802 110.53%
Plant No.l Operations 4,728,187 4,807,491 5,804,800 4,826,374 83.14%
Plant No.2 Operations 6,530,107 6.534268 8,659.300 6.858,676 792D%
Mechanical Maintenance 3,412,608 3,366.660 4,467,300 3208,488 71.98%
s Ekrkical&Instrumentation Mtce. 3,383,044 3,167.873 4.509.100 3,134,313 69.51%
Air Quality&Special Projects 455.825 407,656 2.446,700 746,828 30.62%
Central Generation 1,987,054 1,839236 680,900 1.935,981 284,33%
Total 21,143,974 20,537.532 27,424,400 21.504.313 78.41%
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 511.118 472.715 665,DD0 211,016 31.73%
Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 2.564,947 2,071.193 3,719,30D 2,810,905 75.68%
r Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,111,587 2.086,463 3,147,300 2.574.594 81.80%
Source Control 339.453 179.745 250.700 (78,141) .(31.17%)
So"&Emergency Response 273210 239.761 695,600 582A43 9T87%
Total 5,800,315 5.049,877 8,377,000 6,101217 72.83%
r Engineering Deparlmem
Engineering Administration 101 13278 5,600 (65276) (116584%)
Planning&Design 84.425 39,633 3,100 (121.889) (3931.90%)
r Construetton Management 83.472 278476 179,500 (334286) (18623%)
Total 167,998 331587 188.200 (521,451) (2T7.07%)
Total Joint Operating Expenses 35274.733 34,545,103 48.395,000 35.653.992 75.74%
Less:Revenues (3,952,169) (2,843.734) (4,395,000) (3,843,725) 87.46%
Net Joint Operating Fspenses $ 31.322.554 S 31.701,369 $ 44,000,000 $ 32.810267 74.67%
r
Section 2-Page 3
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report J
Summary of Expenses by Major Category For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 L
Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent i
Budget 7hru 7hru (Deaease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining 4>J
Description 1999-W 03/31/00 03/31/99 $ % Realbed Bud9ei
Salary,Wages&Benefits $37,655,800 $29.117,697 $28,943,230 $ 174,467 0.60% 77.33% $ 8.538.103 j
ldninismerve Expenses BD4,10D 467.527 520,209 (52.682) -10.13% 58.14% 336,573 Y.1
Pinning&Publicetlon 393,300 246,9W 245,755 1.205 0.49% 62.790/6 146,340 `I
Training&Meetings 991,000 552,471 387,345 165,126 4263% 55.75% 438,529 -
I
Operating Expenses 4,887,200 3.847.241 3.569,133 279,108 7.8r/a 78.72% 1,039,959 69
Contractual Services 6,822,700 5.241,375 4,290,614 950,761 22-16% 76.82°.5 1,581,325
V
Professional Services 2,420,900 1.374,906 941,802 433.094 45.99% 56.79% 1,046,0D4
Research&Moinaring 2,428,SDD 1,574,142 1,301,076 273,068 20.99% 64.82% 854458
Repairs&Maimerwxe 5.630,400 3.383,681 3.079,221 304,460 9.89% 60.10% Z246,719 _
Utilaies 3,58QDD0 z717.9/8 2512,370 295.608 8.18% 75.92% 85ZO22 W
Other Materials,Supplies, _
and Senics 2,513,600 1.341.881 1.389,516 (Z7,635) -2.02% SUM 1,171,719
L
Net Cast Alocetion (19,73ZWM (13,211.857) (12.614,168) (697,609) 4.74% 66.0% (6.520743)
Total Jam Operating Expose 48,395,000 36,653,992 34,545,103 Z108,889 6109A 75.74% 11,741,008 J
Revenues&Offsets (4,395,000) (3,843,725) (Z843.734) (999.991) 35.16% 97.46% (551,275) I
Net Jam Operating Expense $44,000.000 U$3Z810,26% $31.701.389 It 1,108,898 3.5D% 74.57% $11,189.733
Gallonage Flow(MG) 91,240.89 66,228.00 66,521.09 (293) -0.44%
� i
Galloage Rm(MGD) 250.00 240.83 24278 (1.95) -0.80% f..l
Gallonage Flaw($*s(MG) $ 48224 $ 495A1 $ 476.56 $ 18.85 3.96%
L
J
u
V
L
Section 2—Page 4
61
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
r Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase
1111 Thor Thru Rennnng thru (Decree) (Dacha e)
Description 1999M ON31100 03131100 B-kit 03r3V99 $ %
r
Inter District Sewer Use $1,500,000 $1,853,199 123.55% $ (353,199) $ 935,368 $ 917,831 96.13%
Wastehauler 425.000 302546 71.19% 122,454 327,973 (25,427) -7.75%
Sludge Disposal 900.000 613,450 68.16% 286,550 511.625 101,825 19.9D%
Scrap Sales 25,000 3239 12,96% 21,761 67 3,172 4734.33%
Other Sales 200.000 11.796 5.90% 198.204 7.736 4,060 52.48%
Rents&Leases 120,000 121,659 101.38% (1,659) 119.156 2,503 2.10%
.+ General Non-Operating 50,000 63,237 126.47% (13.237) 33,928 29.309 86.39%
Vehicle&Equipment 300,000 226,860 75.62% 73,140 223.695 3,165 1.41%
r PoM rSales 550,DD0 391 72.55% 150,957 439.724 (40.681) -9.25%
Sampling Charges 325,000 248,696 76.52% 76.304 244,462 4234 1.73%
Total Joint Operating
Revenues $4,395.000 $3,843,725 87.46% $ 551275 $2.843.734 $ 999.991 35.16%
Section 2-Page 5
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 V
Expense %Expanse Expo o Inveaee Irnaease V✓
Budget muu This Reasinillg Thm (osasae) (Qeaease)
Deeolptlen 199►00 0713110) 03131100 Budgt 03131M 9 % . .
Selerimt w4m.8 Bdft
u
selalesa 1111s9se 9 M.123,300 $ 24,B%,248 77.38% $ 7.255,052 9 24.388.831 8 489,417 1.82%
Enpblee BaneBlc 1
Raft a 1,9mem 1,575.422 81.27% 353,173 2,009,737 (434.315) -21.61% bell
Gmp lmaarsm 3,177,000 Z337.885 73.511% 838704 2,255,5W M,388 320%
Tutxn RamWeanrt - 58,1W WA (SQ19r) 62,550 (6,362) -1Q17%
Unlfann Remel 67,200 50,301 74.85% lemg 482134 Z007 4.35% J
Wakes Canpc setim 237,40D 232,500 97.94% 4,90D 164,249 6a.mi 41,55%
Unanpb/ns reu. 11Z30D 7.133 8.35% 105,187 4,142 2,991 7221%
Total Bmnelits 5,63ZSOD 4,250,,449 78.99% 1,273051 4,554.399 (2941950) 448% LI
Maas,Wage:,B Benefits 37,W5,800 29,117.1197 77.33% 8,538t® 26,943230 174,467 Q80%
861er1a1a supWl�85aNr®
U
Albninlebetiva Expenses
MenhoreWps 182,100 131.143 7202% SQ957 109,393 21,750 11i
Office Exp-Supplies 155,200 90,093 SSAS% 6511W 113,389 (23,293) -20.59%
OIAca use-dna 109,000 57,412 5267% 51,588 69.105 (11,693) -1alli
ski ConWer Senn 250.001) 134,301 9.72% 115,699 2 ,123 (Ml= -34.53%
Slim Fumtiee,Fatam,etc 107,80) U.578 9363% 53.222 23,199 31.379 1352616
Mntin9 8 Publiceffm iu
Repalnllaso 285= 181,326 63.56% 103874 188,448 (5,122) -ZM%
PnirEn9Oulatls 73,3m 30.768 41.13% 4Z534 35.923 (5,157) -143 ' I
Nokms BAEs 24,6M 30,788 125.15% MISS) 17,134 13.654 7918% M
Phdo Rscae m 1Q20B 4,W0 40.00% 8,12D 6250 (2,170) 3472%
Training B llbe6ngs
Mari M6,OOD IS2,873 64AD% 83,077 142091 10,832 T6M Y4
Tmrv, 755.000 399,518 5292% MSS 245.254 154,2114 6291%
OpaAing ExOases
C moe Csd}leis 1,307,300 M032 7435% 335,268 9 .nil 48,811 SW% 6J
Suffice CaNd 1,255,8M 1,m1,254 62a2% 214,5% 9I5.M 125,475 1370%
Odx Cand 1,424,2M 1,051,4W 74.53% 36279i 1,057,101 3.555 Q34%
Claucais-Cagen.Oper. 29,700 S,W4 17.08% 24,626 7.0a7 (ZM3) -2851% U
MareOama Clericals 28.300 72. 0 79.17% 5,895 4277 18,127 42389%
Gmdim.Deed B Oil 158,600 136,556 85.10% Z{OM 185,ST2 (40.016) -2841%
Tole 172,33C) 113.734 65.82% MOOS 65.923 47.811 7253% I
SW.Pair .BJan Supplies 41,600 31.478 75.W% 1Q1M Is4 (14,974) -224% �e
l Chadcals B Supplies 334.000 30.8,771 104.42% (14,TTi) Z .%l 113,620 4844%
W Omeei,suppiks 134,9M 114,519 84.89% Man 125,027 (10,5m) 440% 1
(Camruaf)
ii
M
Section 2—Page 6
L'
J.O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line than
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
r Ermmna %Fxpe. Expose Increase Increase
Budget Thru Thru Remaining Thru (Decrere) (Dsenae)
t a4ription 1098419 801311110 037311N Budget 03131199 $ %
r Confinuad
contractual swim
3,Ids Removal 4,293,500 3,09003 85.38% (128,597 3.031,9W 832,971 20.N%
Other Waite Disposal 490,70D 318264 84.88% 172,436 Me29 (17.365) 3.17%
r GreurdsheepingB newlel 282,000 270.857 103,38% (8,857) 147,789 123,068 83.27%
Ou ude tab Servlas la rm 140,902 94.76% 7,798 512W 89,852 174.93%
Oxygen Rent Open 331.5W 210,116 0.38% 121,384 206,551 3,565 1.73%
Weer 1,296,,300 638.333 49.09% 869,907 517,483 11%670 22.97%
Roiasharel ser nim
19981 390,000 302,737 n1m 87,283 234,170 WN7 29.20%
Audit s Acaun6ng aa00 45.100 08.37% 1,700 46.765 (1,665) 4.68%
r Engineering 440,500 262,242 69.53% 178,258 111.700 1%642 134.77%
Wren 1.543,800 784817 49.55% 778,783 549.197 215,650 392M
Raeuv ch a Monitoring
6Mronmenal Monitoring 1,678,100 1,236.657 TJ.89% "1."3 970,637 258,120 25.30%
r Air Quality MmibRg 95,000 - 0.00% 96.000 16,477 (16.477) -100.00%
Research 955,500 337,485 51.49% 318,015 306.062 31,423 10.27%
Relative sI alnlerence
wl Matedab B Smviae 3,809,100 2.872,329 75.41% 936,1`71 2,50D,638 371,691 14.58%
Sic Mb.Agremants 1.821,300 511,382 28.D8% 1,309,948 578.583 (67231) -11.82%
U0e0a
Teiephme 249,200 1588N 62.96% 92,310 151,528 5864 3.54%
v� Desel For Generam 10,000 10,311 109.11% (311) - 10.311 WA
Nature[Gue 1,032,50D NSA85 92.93% 73,015 738,320 221,165 29,98%
Power 1,411,400 1.011.546 71.67% 399.854 1.014,042 (2,496) -0.25%
Water 876,90D 679,746 66.11% 297.154 608,462 (28.735) 4.72%
r od r Operating SuppON
Oubide Equip Renal 179,800 99,490 55.40% 80110 M783 3.707 3.87%
District Equip Rental 319,400 228,682 70.97% 92,718 222,011 4.671 2.10%
r Iaureae 1,1511,1100 719266 80.54% U18,734 791,320 (72,054) .9.11%
Freight 58,600 41.708 73.e9% 14.892 41.701 7 0.02%
Mbc.Operating Expense 185,000 100.840 59.37% 75.160 113.710 (3,870) 3.40%
AOa1D Operaling Fees 142,0DO 94,617 66.77% 47,183 86.093 8,724 10.13%
r General Mama"
Contingency 129,900 - 0.0D% 129,900 - - WA
Ricryearreapplop8etia 265,700 - 0.0D% 285,700 - - WA
Other Non4)par Expense 47.400 50078 105.65% (2,678) ie'aw 31,180 164.99%
MeN,supp,a serv. 30,471,800 20,748,152 68.09% 9,723.848 ISZ6,,041 2,532,111 13.90%
TOM J.O.Regninraenia 88,127,800 49,865.849 73.19% 18,251.751 47.159271 2.706,578 5.74%
Not Cost A[loca8en (19,732,e00) (13,21I.W7) W.95% (8,520,743) (12.014.168) (597.689) 4.74%
r
Net J.O.Rpuireania 48,395,000 30,853.992 7524% 11.741,008 34845,103 2,108,8119 8.10%
Lase: Revenue (4.395.000) (3,e43,725) 87.46% (551.275) (3,843,734) (909,991) WAS%
r Net J.O.Expendeuree $ 44,000,000 $ 32,810,257 74.57% $ 11,189,733 $ 31,701,389 $ 1.108,698 3,50%
r
Section 2-Page 7
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process Lj
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
I
v
Increase Increase
Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease)
03/31/00 03/31/99 $ %
Treatment Process: v
Preliminary Treatment $ 3,893,142 $ 3,300,270 $ 592,872 17.96% --
� I
Primary Treatment 3,573,913 3,727,936 (154,023) -0.13%
Secondary Treatment 2,532,670 3,105,231 (572,561) -18.44% 1 I
Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 440,148 270.667 189,491 62.62% L1
E10uent Disposal 476,707 444,573 32,134 7.23%
Solids Handling 15,051,067 10.950,977 4,100,090 37.44%
U
Cogeneration 3,133,581 3,000,519 133,062 4.43%
Utilities 568,490 826,886 (258,396) -31.25%
Electrical Distribution 461,142 473.001 (11,859) -2.51% _ .
Miscellaneous Buildings 3,378,997 4,811,145 (1,432,148) -29.77% fV
Air Quality 758,314 736,652 21,662 2.94%
1w
Laboratory 2,385.821 2,897,257 (511,436) -17.65%
Total Joint Operating Requirements 36,653,992 34,545,104 2.108,888 6.10% V
Less: Revenues (3,843,725) (2,843,734) (999.991) WAS%
I (
Net Joint Operating Expenditures $ 32,810,267 $ 31,701,370 $ 1,108,897 3.50% J
V
u
L
Section 2—Page 8
I
L
- - — - - - - - - CIP Review
Capital Improvement Program — FY 1999-00
For the Nine Months Ended March 31. 2000
Plant 1
Collection Projects S5,12],m0
S13A52.003 12
320
Plant 2
56.123]02
1V.
Equipment Items
51A]2.584
4'.
Special Projects Interplant 8 Joint
S3.487,408 Facilities
64: S12,029.042
29°°
Total Capital Improvement Expenditure- S41.691.809
Revenue Revenue
Revenue Area]
Area 53.6W.056 Area 11 Revenue
Revenue S3.359,768 Area 13
51.480.522 9%
Area 5 4°a 8'° $336,054 Revenue
51.963.159 1'e Area 14
5°° 59fi3.241
2
Revenue
Area 1
$3,152.387
8%
Revenue
Area 2
S9.639.523
23°.
Revenue
Area 3
S17.110.099
40%
Total Capital Improvement Funding - S41.691.809
Section 3— Page 1
1999-00 Third Quarter Report u'
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 V
1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected u
Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay
Collection System Improvement Projects
Revenue Area 1
a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1.17 $ 17.000 $ 20,593 $ (3,693) S 24.650 N
b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 15,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 32,000 20,593 11,407 24,551)
Revenue Area 2
a Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment 3 Protection,241 423,800 381.583 42,217 390.917
b Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer,2.31 210.600 23.544 167.055 51,722
c Atwood Subbunk Improvements,2-50 214.000 18.522 195.478 45,665
d Eucid Manhole Rehabilitation,2-34R 1,256,000 730.017 525.983 934,637
e Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump San.Abandonment,2-24-1 1,253.300 9,651 1,243,649 15,644 Sri
f Euclid Relief Improvements-Reach"A",2-52 1.700 8,138 (6,438) a,138
a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 47.700 12,300 47,700
It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 80.400 - 80,400 5,000 4
1 Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer,2-21-1 263,000 8,366 255.234 24,269
j Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 63.800 13.484 50,316 16,855
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 3.827.200 1,241.005 2.586.195 1,540,547
Revenue Area 3 1 .
a Miller-Folder Trunk Sewer System,Reach 1,3-38-1 4,825.900 3.355.394 1,470.506 5,082,T79
b Moils.To Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Ave.,3-9-1 76,000 5,517 70,483 5,517
c Seel Beach Blvd. Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,3.11R 219,500 389,746 (170,246) 389,746 I
d Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer,3-35R 3.437,600 4,555,646 (1,118,246) 7,633,891 Irsl
e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 81,209 (21,209) 239.294
I Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 89,400 16.878 70,522 23,697
9 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 101.900 - 101,900 5,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 3 8,810,300 8.406,590 403.710 13,379,824
Revenue Area 5
I Ralooatkm of Lido Pump Station,641A 332.600 490.804 (168,204) 490,804
b Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer,546 950,400 173,359 777,041 208,972 I
c Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60,000 120,362 (60,352) 120,352 yl
d Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 80,500 80,500 20,000
e Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2.37 178,500 37,756 140,744 47,194 --
f Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 13,400 - 13,400 2,500 I
Sub-Total-Revenue Areas 1,615,400 822,271 793,129 889,822 Lu
Revenue Area 6
a Fairview Relief Sewer,6-12 $68,900 233,763 625,137 233,763 ..I
b Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 15,000 193.795 (178,795) 193,795
c Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,2-37 38,200 6.091 30,109 10,113 6.1
d Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 10,700 10,700 2,500
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 6 922,800 435,649 487.151 440,171 1
Revenue Area 7
u
a Rehabilitation of Gullying Pump Stations,2-37 208,300 44,497 163,803 55,822
b Racquet Hill Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 204,600 38,884 165.716 63,986
c Tustin Airbase-Armstrong SubWnk Sewer,7.27 140,900 89,813 51.087 125 358 I
d Gisler-RedhillTrvnkftelocaton,7-32 129,900 4.897 125.003 4,897 L .
e Orange Trunk Improvements,7-39 55.200 19.830 35,370 29,100
f Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach"A•,7-36 366,800 19,469 346,331 28.578 -
9 RA-6"B"Street and Mitchell Ave.Sewer Rept,7-28 367,700 255,741 101.959 255,741
h Gisler-Redhill/Nanh Trunk Improvements,741 350,700 27,053 323,637 36,129 I.I
i Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 220.878 (160.878) 220,878
I Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab.,7.21 188,600 34.692 153,908 39.551
k Pumpstation SCADA Communications Study 78.100 - 78.100 5,000
1 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 16.100 16,100 5,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Areal 2,155,900 755.764 1,400,136 870,840
Isrl
Section 3-Page 2
II
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
we For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
1999430 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00
Estimafad Actual at Remaining Projocted
wa Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay
Revenue Area 11
a Huntington Beach Sewer and Abandonment,11-23 446,200 144,677 301,523 146,677
r b Goldenwest Trunk Sewer Replacement,11-17-3 2,579,300 239,583 2,339,717 2,454.971
c Hell Avenue Interceptor,11-20 2,565,800 114,371 2,451,429 502,050
d Warner Avenue Relief Sawer,11-22 446,000 26,464 419,536 26.464
e Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 60.000 984.126 (924,126) 984.126
r f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,237 57.400 12,136 45,264 15,170
g Pumpatation SCADA Communications Study 78.100 - 78,100 2,500
It Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 26,800 25,800 5,000
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 11 6,259,600 1,521,357 4.738,243 4,134,958
.r Revenue Area 14
a Miscellaneous Capital Improvements 6.000 248,774 (242,774) 248,774
Sub-Total-Revenue Area 14 6,000 248.774 (242.774) 248.774
r Total Collection System
Improvement Projects 23,629,200 13,452,003 10,177,197 21,529,486
r Treatment&Disposal Prole
Reclamation Plant No.1
1. Preliminary Treatment
a Headwarks No.2 Pump IMP.&Overhaul 2002M - 200,200 200,200
r b Sunflower P.S.Drive Replacement,P1-62 389,BW 36,952 353.838 75,052
c Grit Chamber Modifications,P"9 107,800 100 107,700 100
2. Primary Treatment
r a Primary TMatment 72 MGD Expansion,PI37 2,440,000 1.479.621 980.379 1,679,503
b Primary Effluent Pumping Automation 171,800 24.289 147.611 25,000
3. Secondary Treatment
a Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,Pl-36-2 687,200 289,838 397,362 380,451
ma b Rehabilitate Four Trickling Filters,Pt-76 10,600 8,601 1,899 8,601
c Five Trickling Fiiter Clarifiers,Pi-77 10,500 91 10,409 91
4. Solids Handling&Digestion
a Meehanicel Seals on High Rate Digester Mu,SP-30 425,000 93,641 331,359 100,000
r Is Dewaleang Bak Press Rebuild 173,800 145,573 28,222 150.000
5. Utility Systems
a Chemical Facility Modkns,P146.2 2,531,600 1,766,481 765,110 2,231.411
b Electl.Facility Modkns&Safety Upgrades,P140-1 57,100 12.229 44,871 190,492
Transfer to Project Below (12,600) - (12,600) -
Alarm Beacons for Venting of Gas Holder 12.500 30 12,470 12.400
6. Safety&Security Improvements
a Seismic Retum of Four Structures, P144-4 934.700 813,641 121,159 813,541
7. Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-PI 1,000,000 402,005 597.995 705,728
Sub-Totrl -Reclamation Plant 1 9,140,000 5,072.007 4,067,993 6,572,570
r Treatment Plant No.2
1. Preliminary Treatment
a Headworks PUMP IMPrvmt&overhaul,SP-32 216.500 88.549 127,951 100,000
r b Rehab of Main Sewage Pump Motors 209,000 19,957 189.043 175,000
c Headworka Improvements @ Plant 2,P2.66 527.400 44,973 482,427 106,046
Transfer to Project Below - - -
Replacement of Barscreen Influent Gate,P2.63 - - -
aw 2. Primary Treatment
a Rehab D&E Clarifler SWeeP Arms 88,200 - 68.200 68,200
m4 Section 3-Page 3
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year i
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 V
1999-00 1999-00 199"0 1999-00 I� _i
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected Irrl
Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay
3. Secondary Treatment
a DA.F.Support Rail Replacement 65,000 - 65.000 65,000
4. Solids Handling&De,,nia ing LJ
a Dewalering Batt Press Rebuild,SP-37 252.300 192,802 59,498 260,W0
b Sludge Grinder ReplacemenVRehab,SP-36 55.600 7.440 48,060 10,000
G Rehab of Digesters at Plant 2,P2-39 6.441,200 3.015,105 3,426,094 4,011,042
of G1,G-2 Conveyor Bait Rehab 41.800 - 41,800 41,800 61
e Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P260 4,481,500 199,145 4,282,355 225,779
S. Utility Systems
a High Pressure Compressed Air System,P261 489,600 208.819 279.781 370,679
In ModBns to Elec.&Control Systems,P2J7-1 1,546,800 1,072.486 474.314 1,326,09 LI
c Gas Compressor Redundancy.P2-79 439.200 15.995 423.205 28,516
d Utilities Rehab&Refurbishment 13,000 32,969 (19,%9) 65,847
6. Flow Management&Reliability
a Peak Flow Management,J67 57,700 32,930 24,770 57,M9 lid
7. Process Related Special Projects
a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacement 33,400 5,358 2fl 33.400
8. Information Management
a DAFT Hardware and Software Upgrade,SP-21 109,600 - 109,600
9. Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a Warehouse@Plant No.2,P265 $61.000 699,599 161,401 899,599
to Facilities Engineavig Projects,FE-P2 1,000,000 "0'006 569,994 710.880
c Tunnel Ughbrg&Monitoring Rehab.,J65 312,400 2,383 310,017 2.383
Sub-Total -Treahnent Plant 17,220,100 6.078.517 11,141, 883 8,347,529
Interplant and Joint Facilities
1. Collection Facilities V
a Collection Facilities Depot,J-60.1 1,524.300 5.032 1,519,268 5,032
b Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-24 59,700 41.187 15,513 60,523
c SSG Training Facility 20,400 - 20,400 20400
d Co-Op Projects,InBmillnfift.Reduction,J-73 3,475.400 121,222 3.354.178 326:737 Lai
Transfer to Projects Below (140.284) - (140,264) -
Nuisance Flow Diversion Fee at Newport Dunes 40,000 18,522 21.478 25,0010
SSES for Three Collection Areas,J- l 100.284 1,594 98.690 92.290
a Rehab&Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station,1-10 61.100 576 60.524 1,5W L
2. Headworks
a New Grit Augers,J-52 1.073.600 16,882 1,056,718 79,690
3. Secondary Treatment i
a Sec.Treatment Mond.&CUI System Upgrade,J-31-4 34,000 6,074 27,WS 34,000
4. Ocean Outfall Systems
a Investigation and Repaid of Ocean Outrall,J-39 235.400 141,842 93,568 151.50
to Foster Rehab.&Refurbishment J-59 150,am 71,037 79.763 93.429 U
5. Utility Systems
a Gen Gen Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 431,600 629,240 (197.640) 630000
b Cen Gen Air Compressor Controller Upgrade 25.100 - 25.100 250110 Lill
c Impry to Car l Generation Starting Air System,J63 122,7W 5,854 116,846 109.679 Yrtl
d Mcdff s of Can Gen Waste Heal Boilers,J64 195,000 - 1195.001) -
6. Electrical Power Systems
a Area Classifications Studies,Plants 1 8 2,J-35-1 465.300 121,876 343.424 124.110
b Cable Tray Improvements,J47 999.700 344,013 655,687 344,013 V
c Electrical Power System Single-line Diagrams,J-25-5 12.900 3 12,897 100
d Electrical Power System Studies,J-25-4 717,400 561.579 155,821 673.634
a Standby Power Reliability Motlilns,J-33-1 4.049,700 3,820.929 228.771 4.720,429
7. Flow Management Reliability 69
a Ouffall Fiew Meter Replacement,J66 852,501) 87.915 764,585 162.116
II
Section 3—Page 4 Lr
V
aw CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Current Year
as For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
1999-00 1999-00 1999-00 1999-00
Estimated Actual at Remaining Projected
Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay.
8. Salety,8 Security Improvements
a Confined Space Personnel Retrieval System,J-49 292.500 - 292.600 -
b Fire Alarm 8 Security System Upgrade,J-57 40.300 5.105 N,195 15,352
we 9. Information Management 8 Computerization
a Warehouse Bar Code Evaluation 112,000 16.139 95,861 20.000
b Computerized Fee.Records and Dwg.Sys.,J-25-1 732,600 1,413,976 (681,376) 2.438.707
c Internet Application Development 147,100 73,360 73.740 100.000
aw d Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 625,200 168,190 457,010 200,000
e Fiber Optic Upgrades 512.100 4,672 507,428 3D,000
10.Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects
a Modifns to Existing Mechanical System,J-02 1,082.400 27.244 11055.156 37,728
we I Facilities Engineering Projects,FE-J 100,000 631,640 368.360 1,35D,080
c Odor Control Prec.Rehab/Refmt,.,J-71 105,000 67.070 37.930 67,070
Transfer to Projects Below (103.000) - (103.000) -
_ Facilities Modifications for Odor Control.J-71-1 5,000 2,127 2,873 27.145
Facilities Modifications for Odor Control,J-71-2 4,D00 1.400 2,600 22,617
Facilities Modifications for Odor Control,J-71-3 25,000 146 24,864 20,098
Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 89.0D0 5,556 63,444 5.566
aw d Tunnels Structural lntegnty and Cover Rehab.,J-55 378,800 115.597 263.203 304,781
e Chlonne Bldg Much Equip Demolition,J40 176,100 2,587 172,513 2,557
f Information Technology Trailers Addition,J-01 369,900 1,653 368,247 1.653
g Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 160.= 69.204 70,796 130.000
aw 11.Water Management Projects
a Groundwater Replenishment System.J-36 2.767.400 648,025 2.119,375 1,214,256
12.Plant Automation
a Plant Ramwntion/ANomation Project,J42 5,492p00 2,417,293 3,074,707 3,497,397
se b Power Monitoring and Control Systems,J-33-3 $17,600 15.D41 $02.559 17,084
Sub-Total -Interplant B Joint 29,325.700 11.701,402 17.624,298 17.171.371
Sub-Total - Major Projecte 55.685.600 22,851,926 32,633.874 32,091,470
Special Projects
r 1. Primary Treatment
a Emulsion Poyment Make-down Unit Upgrade 100.000 - 100,000 100.000
2. Solids Handling 8 Digestion
a Beg Press Automation 173,000 7.952 165,048 MAN
.,. b Biosolids Class A Si ing Assessment 110.000 - 110,000 110.000
c Biosolids Management Site Acquisition 50,100 - 50,100 50,10D
3. Safety 6 Security Improvements
a Security System Improvements 405,800 84,718 321.082 110.000
we 4. Process Related Special Projects
a Effluent Sampler Improvements 100.000 - 100.000 100.000
5. Information Management
a Automation Report Publishing 58,000 23,367 34.633 45,000
aw b CMMS Programming 198,700 2,652 196,048 10.000
c Document Management 264,90D 106.550 158,350 160.000
d Data Integration 1,251,2D0 341,464 909,736 450.000
e Source Conbol Programming 206,200 29.504 176.6% 75,000
we f Strategic Information Architeolore(SIA) 378.700 48,014 330,656 70,000
g Geographic lnforration System 187,60D 28,754 158.846 60.000
h Intranet Application Development 58.100 4,305 53,795 25,000
i SCADA Communications-Ethermel Study 161,900 141 161,759 1.=
we j VoicefDaba Building Rewiring 142,100 108,670 33,430 120.000
k Networ Test Facility 31,600 2,182 29.618 31.800
1 Year 2000 Data Change 1,365,400 1,250,105 115,295 1,300.000
m Windows 2000 Ops.System Upgrade Pilot IMAGO 25,894 129.006 164,900
we
we
Section 3-Page 5
we
1999-00 Third Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
199940 1999-00 199940 199940
Estimated Actual at Remaining Protected
Outlay March 31,2000 Outlay Outlay
n Field Fiber Optic Terminal Standardization 258.600 27,197 241,403 50,000
o Replacement of Intemplant Fiber Optics 75.400 - 75,400 50.000
p Financial Information System 509,800 60,151 449,649 61,000
q Records Management Program 224,800 7,880 216,220 50,000
5. Miscellaneous&Support Projects
a Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 446,200 29.864 416,335 200,000
b Revision of Standard Specifications,J44 262,200 172,375 89,825 172,375 y
c Shelving/Archiving 30,000 24,560 5,450 30,000
it Office Equipment 7,500 - 7.600 7,51D0
e Portable Storage Building 91500 6.357 4.133 9,500
f Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase l 70.100 - 70,100 70.100 V
g Ocean Monitoring Database-Phase ll 50,100 - 50.100 50,100
7. Strategic&Master Planning
a Strategic Plan-Phase 3,J40-3 222.600 133.111 89.489 133,111
b Strategic Plan Program EIR,J404 409,500 252,423 157,077 253,4eo
c Plant O&M Manual&S.O.P.Project,Phase 1 220.000 1,126 218,875 2.000
8, Water Management Projects
a Water Conservation Coop-Toilet Retrofit Pgm,J-72 400,000 465,869 (65.869) 537,980
b Watershed Consultant Services 150,000 - 150.000
9. Research&Development
a Special Projects for FY 1999-2000 1,367,600 - 1,367,600 -
Transfer to Projects Below (550,090) - (650.090) -
.Anoxic Gas Flotation(AGF)Pilot Test 364,500 77,696 286,804 325.000 V
Ultrasonic Processing for Digestion Improvement 105.900 20,808 85.092 90.000
G-1,G-2 Conveyor Belt Rehab 41.800 296 41,604 41.800
Testing of Chlorine Sen is r/Monilor at Plant 2 37,890 7,088 30,802 37.890
Sub-Total-Special Projects 10,122,300 3,350,072 6,T72,228 5,194,596
Equipment Items 2,964,200 1,472,684 1,491,618 1,472.584
Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 68,772,300 27,674,582 41,D97,718 38,755,650
Construction In Progress Completed at SUMS 565,224 (565,224) 565,224
Total collections,Treatment
and Disposal Projects S 92,401,500 $ 41.691.809 $ 50,709.691 g 60,853.360
Iu
6w
L
1�
v
I.+
Section 3-Page 6 u
U
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Currant Total
Apemed June 30.1999 Year Projected Remaining
r Project Accumulated Projected coatat FUWm
ended Coat Cost June 30,2000 Budget
Collection$V8mIil lmmovemml Proll
Revenue Am 1
.r a Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.,1-17 $ 7,494,000 $ 63.503 $ 24.550 $ 78.053 $ 7.415.947
b Msrellaneoue Capital lmprwena is 500,000 500,000
Sub•Totel-Revenue Arm1 7,994.000 53,503 24,550 78.063 7.915.947
Remnm Aim 2
r a same Ana Rim lnlemeplar Reallymni Raledhn,2-41 31,438,41)) 318.348 300,917 709,265 30,729,135
b Senate Am River Interceptor Relief Sever.231 11,853,600 - 51,722 51,722 11,801,878
c Abood Subtnmk Impravemenls,2-50 1,890,100 - 45.865 45,6115 1,844,435
d Eud d Memtde Rehabilitation,234R 1,964,700 612.006 934,637 1,5/8,643 418,057
e Carton Cram Stuns and Pump Sm.Abandonmcrd,2-241 2,604,900 52,149 15,544 67,793 2,617,107
f Eudkl Relief lmpovmetis-Reach-9,2-52 12,213,0DD - 8,138 8,135 12,PW,8W
g Maoellaome a Capital lmpmvemenle 2,01)(3,0011, - 47,700 47,700 1,9M.300
h T=k Sever Mapping PrgW 124,700 - 5,000 5,0011, 119,700
ey i Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor parallel Sewer.2-21-1 6.OW,800 - 24,269 24.269 4,984,531
J Rehabilca0on of Outlying Pump Slatere,237 2,834,500 87.131 16,855 103,9106 2,630,514
SaMTotal-Revenue Ame2 71.812,700 1.089634 1,540,547 2,610,181 69,202,519
Revenue Am 3
r a holler-Holder Tmmc Sever System,Reach 1.3361 11.536.6W 1.389.965 5.01 6.472.744 5.067.g88
b Mode.TO Magnolia Relief Sever In Wooden Ave.,30-1 212,3W 138,252 5,517 143,769 65,531
c Seal Beach Blvd.Interceptor Moved-Rehab.,3.11R 480,OW 25.277 389.746 416.023 43,977
d Rahebli8alion of M Magnolia Twlk Serer,3-35R 10,352,OOD 117,833 7,633,881 7,751,724 2,600,276
r e Meoellarggra Capita Imlemme la 2.g00.000 - 239.294 239,294 1,760,709
f Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations.237 3,685,301) 121,983 23,597 145,500 3.542.720
9 Trunk Sa aw Mapping Prgecl 151 5,001) 5.000 152,900
Sub-Total-Rworm Ama3 28,407,100 1,794,310 13.M.624 15,174,134 13,mi'af6
r Ravenm ArmS
a Relocation of Lmo Pulp Sham,541-1 3,395,200 2,825.786 490.804 3,317,589 T7,611
b Replaoerrlem of Be&Bay Trask Server,546 8,093,81Dg 16.278 208.972 225,250 7,8%.55D
c Mscellaneau Capita Impmmrmnla ZODO,WD - 120.352 120= 1,879,648
r d PumpswUm SCADA Communicabom Study 80,500 75.550 20,000 95,550 (15,050)
e Rehabilitation of ONy7ng Pump Statiare,237 7.376.700 243,965 47,194 291,159 7,085,641
f Truck Sewer Mapping proled 20,BW - 2,500 2.6W 18,3W
Sub-Toml-Revenue Arms 20,967,000 3,162,578 W9,822 4,052,40D 16, 14,BW
r Ravonm A.6
a Fairview Relief Samer,6.12 3.594,90D 2,789.702 233,763 3,023,465 571.435
b Mscellaneoue Cepilallmplwememe 500,0100 - 193.795 193.795 306,213
c Rehabilitation of Outlying pump Slatiom.2-37 1,5W,70D 52,279 10,113 62392 1,518.306
�+ d TWk Seger Mapping Prciad 16,600 Z500 2,500 14,100
Sub-Tofal-Bananas Am 6 6692,200 2,841,981 440,171 3,282.152 2,410,048
Revonm Ama]
a Rehabllte0on of Ou"ng Pomp Stall-.237 8.693,91DID 297,530 55,612 343.152 8,350,748
r b Raclue1 MII pure,Siatlm AEatdommm,7-143 204,6W - 63,996 63,986 140,614
c Tudin A TbaseNrtmborg Subbtmk Saner,7-27 9.654,400 198,471 126,3511 324,829 9.329.571
d CiderRedNll Tnmk Relocation,732 5,906,5W 5,934 4,897 10.631 5189516M
e Orange Trunk lmpmvemems,739 3,942.600 - 29.100 29,100 3,913,400
r f GlslerRedhlll Tmm lmi manneme,Rmtl1"A",738 4.01 - 28.578 28,578 3,997.122
g RA4t'9"Sped arcl Michell Ana.Same Repl.,7-28 417,400 39,361 255,741 295,1W 122.298
h GislerRedMNNalh Truck lmpmvenente,741 5.704,100 - W,129 36,129 5,W7,971
1 Mscellaneam Capital lmprmOmms 2WD.WD - 220,878 220,878 1,779.122
r I &rnoeer interceptor Mammte Rehab.,7-21 5,412,700 77,1)86 39.551 117.517 5205.183
k Pumpladon SCAIDA Cormrarkenrt SWty WOW - 5,W0 S,OW 73.100
1 Tmnk Saver Mapping project 24,900 - 5,000 5,000 19,900
Sub-Tohl-Ravmuo Arm] 48,g84,800 OW 262 770,840 1148Q102 ,R584.898
r
Section 3-Page 7
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements—Project Life I
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 L!
cprerd Taal
Appoved J.A 1999 year Projected ftanairi g
Pro)ect Ac atad Projected Costa Fuhao u
Budget c et cost Jum 3D,]DOD Baker
Ravawe Area 11
a Hmbrgtoa Beads Sewer artl Abandoment 11-23 538.70D 54,028 1M,677 198.705 3.19,995
b Golder wst Talc Sever Reyaamad,11-17.3 3,920.400 105771 Z45g971 Z56D,742 1,359,658 y
c Hal Avenue Intercept".l l-M 4,072,900 99,565 SUZO50 6M.615 3,471,285
d via Avenue Relgf Satyr,I I-M 4,027,70D - 28.464 25.454 4,001,235
e Msallarears Capital brymemarda 2,o0D.M) - gB4,128 954.125 1,015.874
f RehabiWon of Outlyug Purrp Sfatbom,2-37 2.371,100 78,417 15.170 93,587 2277,513 Ld
g Rmptatim SGADA Ca mcallans Story 78,100 - 2,50D 215DD 75,6M
h Tau k Sewer Mapping Project 41,600 - 5,000 5.000 35,6110
Sub-Tolal-Revenue Area 11 17,050.500 337.781 4,134,998 4,47Z739 12,577,761
Revemre Area 14 Li
a fJ6sa41armus CapfallrtprwmenC 200,ODD 24&774 M774 (48.774)
Sub-Total-Revave Area 200,ODD - 248,774 248,774 (46774) 1
Total Collection System L
irnw nee Projects 198,188,300 9,869,049 21,529,486 31,398535 166.789.766
Treabrerd 8 Disposal Prpieas
R anvtlm Mare W.1
1. P mrary Tre at
a Fkadwhs No.2 Pimp Inp.B OerhatA 200,210 - 20D.200 2DQ210 -
b SLIaP.S.DM Raplaosrart Plfi2 407.400 18.654 75,052 93.706 313694 J
c Ca Chenber Modiriatiom,P169 141,800 - 100 100 141:700
2 Binary Treatmart
a PMeryTnetr*ad 72 MC8 EMansion,P1-37 75,450.100 1,012.186 1,679,503 Z691,689 7Z758,411
b Pnnmry Effi MP.piigAtaraboa 171,800 11,628 25,000 36,6211 135,272 L
3. Sa ary Treatrrenf
a Sraamary Treebrenf EWareionto60MGD,Plafi-2 40,BOQ000 39.322,28E 380,451 39.7CZ739 1.097,261
b Rahwilita'a Four Tdtlding RBere,P1-M 9,SDg00D - 8.601 saw 9,491.399
c Fite Tdddkg FBer Claifias,P1-77 11,500,OOD - 91 91 11,499,909 U
4. So&ffi Hardliig a Dgestim
a Mectiardal Seals on tbgh Rafe D'geaa Mw,SPJO 517,000 130.127 IOQODO 23QI27 2B6873
b Oewetedrg Bell Puss Rebdld 526,80D - 150,o00 15QODO 376,800 I
5. 1150y sysmirs u
a Cterrial Factlily Moddm,P146-2 4215,300 685.308 Z231,411 Z916,719 1.318,581
b Bad.Fadlify MDVm 8 Safety llpgrades,P1461 44Z9DO 231,921 IM422 422.415 20.485
Trerderb PmjadB (1ZS00) - - - (IZ500)
Alarm geaam Inventing ofGs l-bb r 1ZsD0 2,573 IZ40D 14.M (4473) V
6. Safety B Smarty lnprevarms
a SeW=Rsbada Fan Sb XUae;, M1 1,329,000 ZOM.014 813,541 3.486.555 (2,157,555)
7. Msanareas B Suppot Projects
a Facilities Engiree"Preface,FE-Pi 2D,ODQ000 604,362 7M72B 1 IOADD 18,S89,910
Sub-Toms -Ivrdarnafbn Rand 165,22Z30D 4g691,9m 6,57Z570 51264,533 113,957,767
Treabrerd Plard R 2 i
1. Prebmmry Trestrmnf
a 1Yad rks Punpinp"&Owdaul,SP-32 30D,000 93,90E 100,000 193.9DB 106,092
b Rehab of Main Sewage Purrp Motes 2D9,000 - 17SOD0 175,000 M.ODO
c H9w&AWkS1rrV a @Pmol2,P266 14,708,000 42792 106.046 14B.Me 14,559,162
Tramfer to Project Below - - - y
Replaairent of Baaaeea lMWat Gale.P263 5.032 - 5.032 (S.M2)
2 PmrwyTreaanag
a RetebDBEClarifia SwapAms 68,210 - 68,200 682DO
V
Section 3—Page 8
u
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
- For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Cw Trial
Appr J.W,1999 Year Pmtecled P rring
_ Protect A=Mdared PrtieCed cortffi Future
Budget cost Cost June 311,2000 OWOd
3. SemMary Treabrett
a OAF.Sppon Rat Replacwwd 65.000 - 65,000 MOOD -
- 4. Sorids HardMg&Digestion
a De sterirg Be0 Press P�fld,SP-37 82600D 55.970 250,OOD 306,970 519.030
b Sludge Gnnder Replamme R ahab,SP-W 224AW - 10,000 10.000 214.000
c Rehab of D*sters at Fad Z P2-39 2205&5W 1=114 4.011,042 6247,166 16811,344
- d G1,G2 Comryor Beft Rehab 41.SDO - 41.80D 41AM -
e Solidq Storage FacRy 0 Plad Z P2b0 18.32/,911D 693.352 225.779 _ 91%141 17AGS.759
5. lJtility Systers
a Kgh Pressure Cmrpressetl Air Syslkrn P24s1 MMODD 61.841 370.679 43Z57D 127.460
r It ModRre to Eke&CWbd Systerrs,P2<7-1 Z637.gOD 701,005 1,326009 2027)DU emm
c Cks corrpreaem Rad dancy,P2-79 496800 6D 2016 26576 471,224
d 17dfities Rehab&Refurbishnard 1.000.000 - 65,847 65,847 934.153
6. 19m fJ®ugmenl&Reliability
- a RackHmatmagerneMJ67 3.640.000 3.994 57,349 ww 3.618,657
7. th Related Spedal Projects
a LCI Surge Suppressor Replacererd 3&40D - 33.40D 33,400 B. Irdwrretion Managenerd
a DAFr Hardeare and So%aare Upgrade,SPL21 180.000 17,920 - 17,920 16Z0OD
9. kftscelialmrs&Suppdt Projects
a tA6rehouse @ Pard No.Z P265 159&WD 91Z411 699199 1.612010 (14,010)
b Faal3ies Fng, e m Projads,F -P2 20.000.OW 575268 710.880 1=148 18.763.a62
- c TunrmJ Ugh rg&Mnnitomg Rehab.,J65 459500 Z303 Z383 457,117
SubtrTotal -Trea6mnd Plard2 97,483,OOD 4.3496T/ &342529 IZ697206 74,765,794
h oeplerd and Jdrd Fad li8es
1. Cdler0on Facilities
a Collection FaaOtws Depot J541 1,534,100 - 5.032 5.032 1X9,086
b &shard Tw&Send Rehab.,I-24 3Z863AM 43,798 60.523 104,321 3Z699.179
c SSO TramM FepldY 63,800 - 20.40D 20.400 43.400
_ d CoOp Prgeds,HROWI fOt Reduc8m.173 isuoto OOg - 325,737 326.737 149,61026E
TrBsferto ProjectsBew (40.00O) - - - (4(t000)
Nuaama Flow DNecsm Facal Newpot Dines 40.000 - 25.000 25,001) 1&006
SSES1or Three Cdk'dim A183S. p761 10UM - 92290 9229D 7.991
e Rehab&Upgrade of Ella Ave.Pure StattM 1-10 1.799e%D - 1,5M 1,600 1,79a,17W
2 11eadworla
a Nex68Augers,J52 1,210,000 4ZO97 79,690 121,757 1,088213
3. Semndary Treabrend
ey a Sec Trea0lerdl%D t&Chi SystrntA+gro0e.J314 4,315,000 450644 34,OW 493,644 3.871}56
4. Oman OWa0 Systars
a Imesb9atimerd Repaidof Ooosn Odfal,J39 1,274,60D 91Z454 151.548 1,OK012 210568
b Foetec Rdnb.&RtlwbsWmKJ&9 28203,000 - 93,429 93.429 28.106.57E
5. t101fly Systers
a Car Can EAghvaAir Enw;aNlmdtadn9Sys 563,20D 1%185 630.00O 7KI85 (231.985)
It Can Gen AirCurpmswrCa&dW 11139r2de 25,100 - 25.OM 25ADD 100
c IntrvroCermal Generator Starting Air System J63 140,700 72a3 f0&679 116,902 23.798
- d Modfrscf Can Cm WaNettssl Bdkrs J64 200,000 5,979 - 5.879 IK121
6 Ehedrirsl Poner Systerns
a Area Claaaifimema Sundae.Parts 1&2,J35-1 1 146000 594.198 124.110 718,308 426M
b Cable Tray lcpaiarerYa,J47 1Z750,000 40&711 3M,013 75Z724 11,9972ZM
c Eleemiiml Pone,Syetan Sr9le-6re Dugrars,J-25-5 3,367,500 - 100 100 3.367.400
d BecbKW Pacer Syslen SSkI,.L254 3215.500 957.796 673.634 1.641.430 1,574.070
e Stadby Pacer Relabilfty Maas,3331 17,370,1W 1559,666 4,7211.429 6280.294 11,009.805
7. FIM Managen,att&Whibifdy
a Offs]Fav Mater Replaamnt J66 924.000 7.639 162116 16&755 754245
- Secflon 3-Page 9
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report L
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life I I
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 L
Qarent Total
Approved[ June M,1999 Year Projected Remaining L
Project Ac Itded Prolechad Coma Future
Budget cost Cost June 30,2000 Budget
a. Salary&Seamy lrrpmvarema
a Confined Spare Personnel Retrieval System,J49 423.000 23.04 - 23.994 399AM
It Rm Almon&6eoviy SMrar UpWado J S21,000 612.64 15= 627,416 (416) ij
9. Information Management&CampuleNrstion
a W ralhose Bar Code Evaluation 112J6D 16.139 20AM X139 75,1161
b Carqulaired Fac Reo udc end pg.Sys,12 I 4,95S300 SK462 2436,707 3.331180 1,821,111
c Internet Appti000n De Aopment 382,200 96,579 10D,00D 196579 185AM L
d Nee ark Baddeone Upgrade CoMmstion 1,4'9,M0 SM125 200,000 W125 573.876
e Fiber Optic Upgrades 680,000 241,120 301OW 271,120 389,980
10. Miscellaneous&Support Pmjeds
a Mortars to Erbsting Medraapl System,J62 26942M 217,653 37,728. 255,391 Z43MM Vj
b Facades Fsgineedrg Rejects,FEJ 20.OMAW 750,10 1,3W.080 2,1ODXI3 17,889.767
c Ode Cordial Pmn ReluM2efob.,J-71 5,337.0110 - 67.070 U7,070 5AMM
Trsrsterto Projects Below (103,W0) - - W1- (103.0
Fadities Modifications for Odor Cordml,J-71-1 5,000 - 27.145 27.10.5 (22,14.5) Lai
FaolNes Mocifastiers for Odor Cmmd,J-714 4,W0 - 22,617 22.617 (18,617)
Footless ModifipOms for Odor Cddrd,J-71-3 25,000 - 20.096 20.098 4902
Comprehensive Odor COMB A5ses"B'd 69,00D - 5,556 5,555 63,4M I
d Tumels Sn Baal lmegmy and Rehab.,J65 428,3M 43,W1 3D4,781 347,782 78.518 L
e CMaine Bldg Meth EmdP DerreStiat J 210,70D V.241 25e7 29,82E 180'm
f bdom mTedvMogy Trailer Add[NCAJ61 397.100 27,416 1.60 29,W9 388,M7
g Small CapBal E>T.dpmem Repa¢srrn Prejed 240,000 99.728 130.OW 229,728 10.272 L
11. Wmer Maregenenl Projects
a GmaWstef RepsnshnsJd Slslean,J-36 121,9N1. M 79 AU 1,214285 2011,948 119MZ752
12. Plem Autoratioi
a F7amReimentia/AtdmutlonPmojed,J42 25,76D,4W 2215.888 3,487,397 6.703,085 20,05 =b L'
Prier MOMartrg artl CmNd Srylens,J333 4.047.300 692 17,M 17.776 4029.620
Sub-Tobd -Intarplent&Joim 450,651,084 11,904227 17,171,371 29,075,9% 421X5A86
Sub-Total - Major Projects 7W,356.384 W,945,857 3ZO91.470 93,037.337 610,319.047
Special P-)ecb I I
1. Pnnoy Treataard L
a Emrdaon Polymenl Makedown the Upgrade 1 W.000 - 1M,I100 1W,W0 -
2. Solids Nar&ng&DigesSon
a Bed Bess Automation 175,000 8.502 SQOM 58.502 116ASB I
b BiosOttis ClassaASUng As�sncm 110.000 - 110,000 110,OM - L
c Biomlids&laiagenmam Stu Atqusidon 5D,100 - W,iW W,100 -
3. Surety&Seaaiy1mpmao%ar1s
a See-ty System Orlaxvaaads 1,3328OD 363,499 110.WD 4TJ,499 aWdM I
4. Process Raised Special Projects L
a FJfiuem Senator lrgmvarenfs 100.000 - 100,000 100,000 -
5. Infonretiw Managemend
a Automation Report Publishing 195,00D 58.579 45,00D 103,579 91,421
It CMMS Progrzmrang 490,000 271A30 10,001) 251,430 M570 L.I
c DcaaneM Management 800= 296,Z79 160,001) 456,279 343,721
d Data lmegmdon 4,334,000 1,651.848 450.000 2,101,848 2232152
e Source Coned Programmvng 576,M0 3D4,378 75.000 379,378 198,622 I
f Sbmegk Inlmration Mhhedme(SIA) 724,000 221,807 70.000 291.8D7 43ZI93 Yrl
9 Geographic lmomution System 874.000 49,867 W,WO 109,857 764,143
h Intranet Appfi b.Developmard 235,600 74,322 25,000 99.322 136278
i SCItOA Conmwioliors-Elennet Study 161,9110 - 1,DW 1,M0 1609W u
1 Vdoe7Data Bulding Revming 6WAOD 486,9W 120,000 606,903 73,197
k Ne rlt Teal Faa5ty 125,00D 81.4W 31,WO 113259 11.741
I Year 2000 Data Charge 3,465,4W 1,W9,889 1,300,000 3209,8811 255,512
m Wtrtlove 20DO Ops.System Upgrade not 154,900 - 154.900 154,9W -
Section 3-Page 10 IL.1
CJ
CIP Review
Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
ammt Total
Approved June W.19% Year Projected Roealning
Project Accumulated Projected 3 L Future
ne
Budget Cost Coal Ju0.2060 Budget
o Flapsoa OPBCTeminal StandeColes n 324, 82,030 50,000 -32 150.030 192,670
o Financsrtenteflflon Syste , Oplb 498,500 - 61,000 50,000 448,500
�.+ p Fwndalllanage on Syslem 2,958,000 2,307,522 50,000 2,368,522 569,478
q Recerds e&Su pee Program 255,000 - 50,000 50,000 205,000
6. tAzoellenears 8 Supped Projects
a Scrubber Cherdcal Feed S/dem Mad. 81R200 113,601 200" 313,601 498,599
r b Revision of Standard Spedfira0one,J-04 439.70D 251.425 172.375 423,800 15,900
c SheNingrAichMnu 30,000 - 30,000 30,000 -
d Office Equipment 7.500 - 7,500 7,500 -
a Potable Storage Building %600 - 9,500 9,500 -
r f Oceen Monitotrg Detainees-Phase 1 70.100 - 70,101) 70,100 -
g Ocean Montodng Database-Phase ll 50,100 - 50,101) 50,100 -
7. Sbategic&Mader Rannirg
a Strategiclil.,Maso3,J-40.3 2,163.700 1,857,101 133,111 1.990,212 203,488
b Strategic Ran Progmen FJRJ-404 1,120,100 541,714 253,460 795,174 324,926
c Rant O&MManual&S.O.P.Project.Phase 1 230,000 - 2.000 2,000 228,000
8. Wzler Management Projects
a Wafer Conservation Coop-Toilet Retrofit PgAJ-72 4,840,000 252,102 637,960 790,062 3,853,938
b Watershed Conwhent Services 150,000 - - - 150,000
9. Research B Developrrem
a Special"ees/or R'1999-2000 1,387,80D -
r Trerider to Projects Be. (62SOM - - - Si
Arlodc Gas Flclabon(AGP)Mot Test 419,000 - 325,000 325,000 94,000
Ultrai Pmoessing for Digestion lrrprovemeM 128,230 - 90,000 KODO 38,230
G1,G2 Conveyor Bee Rehab 41,800 - 41,800 41.800 -
,�, Testing of Chlonm Sonsoilklondor at Read 2 37,890 37,89D 37,890
Sub-Total-Special Projects 29,844,500 11,114.246 5,194,596 16,378,842 13,466658
Equlpi end))rare 4819tuilm 1,472,S84 1,472,SB9 47,491,616
Total Treabnom&Deposed Projects 7M,165,084 72.130,113 3&758,6W 110,888,763 671,276.321
r Consm¢gon In Progmss Completod al 6130199 551509,490 565,224 56,07g714 (56,074,714)
Total collections,Tree rleM
and Mai l Projects $980,353,384 S 137,508.652 $ 60=.360 $19836z012 $781,991,372
r
r
r
` Section 3-Page 11
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
L
I �
L+
IV
L�
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
L
V
u
V
L
L
'V
U
Section 3—Page 12 IU
U
Budget Review by Revenue Area
All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Operatinta BWaet Review
r
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Data
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax Nlocations/SuWenlims(Sham of 1%) $ 32,861,000 $ 22.470.712 $ 10,390,288 68.38%
Connection Fees 5,187.000 5,357,402 (170,402) 103.29%
Other Fees 74,3D1,ODD 49,958,710 24,342,290 67.24%
Sale of Capacity Rights 198.000 - 19SD00 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 26,778,000 12,854,129 13,893,871 48.11%
r Total Revenues $ 139,323,000 $ 90.670,953 $ 48,652,D47 65.08%
OUTLAYS:
r Share of Joint Works Treabrent Plant CIP $ 68.771,000 $ 28239,806 $ 40,531,194 41.08%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Consdu*on 23.629,200 13,45{O03 10.177,197 56.93%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 41,690,000 37.487.320 4202,680 89.92%
v„ Share of Joint Vdaks Operating Expense.; 44,D00,000 32,810287 11,189,733 74.57%
Revenue Prey Operating&Other Expenses 9,355,500 29,384212 (20,027,712) 314.05%
Total Outlays $ 187,446,700 $141,373,608 $ 46.073,092 75.42%
r
Capital Facilities Budcet Review
.. Balance Adjsorcrds Trarsferto Balance
07/01199 &AddNons Fixed Assets 03/31/00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Anal'Constniction in Progress $ 41,359.189 $ 13,452,003 $ - $ 54.811,192
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 68,714,703 28.239.805 - 96,954,509
Sub-Total 110,073,892 41,691,809 - 151,765,701
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 2.675257 - - 2,875257
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3OZ933274 - - 302933274
Treatmerd Facilities 19,112 - - 19,922
Disposal Fadlities 101,528 - - 101,528
General Plant and Adnunishative Facilities 885,732 _ _ 886,732
Equity in Jdnt Tmatrrem Facilities 783.840,058 - - 783,840.058
Other Assets at Cost Less Am rtvzUon 44,434 - - 44.434
Sub-Total 1,090,50D215 - - 1,090,500,215
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $12D0,574,107 $ 41,091.809 $ - $1242,265,916
`+ Section 4-Page 1
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
iiRevenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Operating Budget Review
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Data Budget %of Budget I l
REVENUES:
U
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) $ 1.859,000 E 1,522,520 $ 336,480 81.90°/<
Connection Fees 455.000 189,843 255,157 41.72%
Other Fees 8,410,000 5,153,980 3,256,020 61.28% ha
of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interesl&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,549,000 599,135 949,865 38.68%
Total Revenues $ 12,273,000 $ 7,465.478 $ 4,807,522 60.83% V
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 7,661,000 $ 3,131,794 $ 4,529,206 40.88%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 32,000 20,593 11.407 64.35%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 5,848,000 4,887,390 960,610 83.57% 11
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,699,000 3.392.582 1,306,418 7220% V
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 599,000 2,003,530 (1,404,530) 334.48%
Total Outlays $ 18,839,000 $ 13.435,889 $ 5,403,111 71.32% I
Capital Facilities Budget Review L
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101199 &Additions Fixed Assets 03Y31100 if
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: `,(
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 53.575 $ 20,593 $ _ $ 74,168
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 7,620,461 3,131,794 - 10,752,255
Sub-Total 7.674,036 3,152,387 - 10,826,423 IL11
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: j
Land and Pmperty Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 LJ
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 6,903,001) - 6,903,000
Treatment Facilities - _
Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 L,I
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 58.241 - _ W241
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 86.894.517 - - 86,894,517 I
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - _ _ J
Sub-Total 93,948.749 - - 93,948,749
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $101,622,785 $ 3,152,387 $ - $ 104,775,172
L
Section 4-Page 2 Iy
U
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Operating Budget Review
r
1999-00 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Data Budget %of Budget
r
REVENUES:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 10,064,000 $ 6.805,257 $ 3,258,743 67.62
Connection Fees 2,002.000 2,013,086 (11,086) 10D.55%
Other Fees 23,910,000 16,357,9W 7,552,070 68.41%
r Sale of Capacity Rights 148,000 - 148,000 -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 8,181,000 3.940,997 4,240,003 48.17%
,r Total Revenues $ 44,305,DD0 $ 29,117.270 $15.187,730 65.72%
OUTLAYS:
r Shan:of Joint Works Treatment Plana CIP $ 20,150,000 $ 8.398,518 $11,751,482 41.68%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 3,827.200 1,241,005 2,586,195 32.43°A
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 13,188.000 12,798.605 389,395 97.05°A
r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,737,000 10,489,442 3,247,558 76.36%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,688,000 8,576,214 (5,888,214) 319-06%
Total Outlays $ 63,590,200 $ 41,503,784 $12,088,416 77.45%
r
r
Capital Facilities Buddat Review
Balance Adjustments Trensferto Balance
07/01/99 &Additions Rxed Assets 03131/00
r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 2,484,196 $ 1,241,005 $ - $ 3,725,201
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 20,435,753 8,398,518 - 28,634,271
Sub-Total 22,919,949 9,639,623 - 32,559,472
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 517.694 - - 517,094
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 96.923.040 - - 95,923,040
Treatment Facilities - - - -
r Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 218.649 - 218,549
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 233,024.296 - - 233,024,296
r Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 1,125 - - 1.125
Sub-Total 330,717.876 - - 330,717,876
r Total Property,Plant 8,Equipment&CIP $353,637,825 $ 9.639.523 $ - $363,277,348
r
r
Section 4-Page 3
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Revenue Area No.3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 L
Operating Budget Review � j
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Data �J
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: L
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 10,902,000 $ 7,453.095 $ 3,448,905 68.36%
Connection Fees 1,274,000 1,103,097 170,903 86.59%
Other Fees 23,013,000 15,194.923 7,818,077 66.03% 1
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
IMerest B Miscellaneous Revenue 8,447,000 4,269,789 4,187,211 50.43%
Total Revenues $ 43,638,000 $ 28.010.904 $15,825,096 64.19% V
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 21,282,OW $ 8.703,509 $12,58S491 40.88% �+
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 8,810,300 8,406,590 403,710 95.42%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 12,393,000 11,610,424 782,576 93.695%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 13,198,000 9,784.022 3,411,978 74.14% 64
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,349,O00 7,983,107 (5,614,107) 339.00
Total Outlays $ 58,040,300 $ 46,467,652 $ 11,572,648 80.06%
Capital Facilities Budget Review J
Balance Ad)ushnents Transfer to Balance _
07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131100
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: LI
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 12,323,104 $ 8,408,590 $ - $ 20,729,694
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 21,177,871 8.703,509 - 29,881,380
Sub-Total 33,500,975 17.110,099 - 50,611,074
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: L;
Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 70,577.818 - - 70,577.818
Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 11
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28.419 4r�
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 320,153 - - 320.153
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 241.486.220 - - 241,486,220
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - - wl
Sub-Total 312,702,763 - - 312,702,763
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP $346,203,738 $ 17,110,099 $ - $ 363.313,837 IuI
L
li
L
Section 4-Page 4
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No. 5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Operating Budget Review
r
1999-00 Year To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ 3,014.000 $ 2,091,224 $ 922,776 69.38%
Connection Fees 364.000 29,870 334,130 8.21%
Other Fees 2,462,000 1,872,819 589,181 76.07%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,724,000 982,819 741,181 57.01%
r Total Revenues $ 7,564,000 $ 4,976,732 $2,587,268 65.79%
OUTLAYS:
r Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 2,785,000 $ 1,140,888 $1.644.112 40.97%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 1,615,400 822,271 793.129 50.90%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,820,000 2,273,771 (453,771) 124.93%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,734,000 1,250,071 483,929 72.09%
Revenue Area Opereting&Other Expenses 890.500 1,049,619 (959.119) 207.71%
Total Outlays $ 8.844,900 $ 7,336.620 $1,508,280 82.959/6
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
H
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31/00
r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 4,907,830 $ 822,271 $ - $ 5,730,101
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,776,074 1.140,888 - 3,916,962
Sub-Total 7,683.904 1,963,159 - 9,647,083
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
r Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69,740
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 34,299.567 - - 34.299.567
Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347
r Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 39.402 - - 39,402
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 31.655,177 - 31,655.177
r Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - -
Sub-Total 66,078,348 - - 66,078,348
r Total Preperty,Plant&Equipment&CIP $73.762,252 $ 1,963.159 $ - $75,725,411
r
r
Section 4-Page 5
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report Iof
Revenue Area No.6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review I I
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Operating Budget Review I d
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES: �bd
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 1,382,000 $ 872,064 $ 509.936 63.10%
Connection Fees 91,000 23,525 67,475 25.85%
Other Fees 3,593,000 2,556,401 1,036,599 71.15% 1 ,
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interesl&Miscellaneous Revenue 1,481.000 713.478 767.522 48.18%
Total Revenues $ 6.547,000 $ 4,165.468 $2,381,532 63,62% J
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 2,558,000 $ 1,044,873 $ 1.513,127 40.85% u
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 922,800 435,649 487.151 47.21%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,457,D00 1.364.121 92,879 93.63%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.742,000 1.335.378 406,622 76.66% 6.i
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 262,500 1.263,996 (1,001,498) 481.52%
Total Outlays $ 6.942,300 $ 5,444,017 $ 1,498,283 78.42% V
Capital Facilities Budget Review )�
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131100
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: J
Revenue Area Construction In Progress $ 6.603.872 $ 435,649 $ - $ 7.039,521
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,542,444 1,044,873 - 3,587.317
Sub-Total 9,146,316 1.480.522 - 10,628,838
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT: j
Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 5,153,761 - - 5,153,761
Treatment Facilities 2,653 - 216M
Disposal Facilities 7,394 - - 7,31M �r
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 113.761 - - 113,761 _
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 28,991.098 - - 28,901,098 '
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - - - jJ
Sub-Total 34.269,229 - - 34,269.229
Total Property,Plent 8 Equipment&CIP $43,415,545 $ 1,480,522 $ $44,898,067 y
V
J
Section 4-Page 6
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000
Operating Budget Review
r
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) $ 3,293.000 $ 2.139,580 $ 1,153.420 64.97%
Connection Fees 364.000 884,405 (520.405) 242.97%
Otter Fees 7,367.000 4,874.225 2,492,775 66.16%
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 2,170,0DD 1.021,061 1,148,939 47,05%
Total Revenues $ 13,194,000 $ 8,919.271 $ 4,274,729 67.60%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 7,180,000 $ 2,931,292 $ 4,248,708 40.83%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 2,155,900 755,764 1,400,136 35.06%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,677,000 2,436.001 1,140,999 68.10%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,488,000 3,235.092 1,252,908 72.08%
Revenue Area Operating&Otter Expenses 1,422,5W 3,578,023 (2,155,523) 251,53
Total Outlays $ 18,823,400 $ 12.936,172 $ 5.887,228 68.72%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
h
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 6.940,555 $ 755.764 $ - $ 7,696,319
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 7,132,586 2,931,292 - 10.053.878
Sub-Total 14,073,141 3,687.056 - 17,760.197
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
r Land and Property Rights 1,578,655 - - 1,578,656
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 41,248.462 - 41248,462
Treatment Facilities - - -
r+ Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10.782
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 98,197 - - 98,197
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 81.331,301 - - 81,331,301
.+ Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization 43,309 - - 43,3D9
Sub-Total 124,310,707 - - 124,310,707
r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 138,383,848 $ 3,687,056 $ - $ 142,070,904
.r Section 4-Page 7
r
1999-00 Third Quarter Report L
Revenue Area No.11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Operating Budget Review j
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dats y
Budget Date Budget %of Budget --
REVENUES: II
V .
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 2,347,000 $ 1,585,794 $ 761.208 67.57%
Connection Fees 364,000 693,698 (229.698) 163.10% -
Other Fees 4,693,000 3,288,873 1,404,127 70.08
Sale of Capacity Rights 48,000 - 48,000 - Ir
Interest B Misoellaneous Revenue 1,810,000 786,170 1,023,830 43.43%
Total Revenues $ 9,262,OW $ 6,254.535 $ 3.007.465 67.53%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 4,539,000 $ 1,838,411 $ 2.700,589 40.50%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,259.600 1,521,357 4,738,243 24.30%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3.220,000 1,964,086 1,255,934 61.00%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,688,000 1,880,028 807,972 69.94% Ls
Revenue Area Operating 8 Other Expenses 904.500 3,064,858 (2,160,358) 338.85%
Total Outlays $ 17,611,100 $ 10,268,720 $ 7,342,380 58.31% I I
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 7,996,081 $ 1,521,357 $ - $ 9,517,438
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 4,473,327 1,838,411 - 6,311.738
Sub-Total 12,469,408 3,359,768 - 15,829,176 L11
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 19,050,027 - - 19,050,027
Treatment Facilities - - - - I
Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 L
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 30,882 - - 30,682
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 51,008.485 - - 51,008,486 1
Other Assets at Cost Less Amorfization - - - - u
Sub-Total 70,239,233 - - 70.239.233
Total Property,Plant&Equipment 8 CIP $82,708,697 $ 3,359,788 $ - $86,068.409 �
V
L
Section 4-Page 8
L
Budget Review by Revenue Area
Revenue Area No.13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
r For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Operatina Budget Review
r
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-0ate
Budget Data Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
r Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) $ - $ 1,178 $ (1,178) -
Connection Fees 273,000 519,878 (246,878) 190.43%
Other Fees 853,000 655,518 197,482 76.85%
r Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 732,000 362,830 369,170 49.57%
^, Total Revenues $ 1,858,OOD $ 1,539,404 $ 318.598 82.85%
OUTLAYS:
r Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 818.000 $ 336,054 $ 481,946 41.08%
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction - - - -
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 22.222 4.778 82.30%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 532,000 462,625 69,375 86.96%
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expanses 27,000 616,780 (589,780) 2284.37%
Total Outlays $ 1,404,000 $ 1,437,681 $ (33,681) 102.40%
r
Capital Facilities Budget Review
.i
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07/01/99 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31/00
r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ - $ - $ - $ -
ShamofJointWorksTreatmentPlantClP 817,705 336,054 - 1,153,759
^' Sub-Total 817,705 336,054 - 1.153,759
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT:
`+ Land and Property Rights - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 3,175,032 - - 3,175,032
Treatment Facilities - -
r'� Disposal Facilities
General Plant and Administrative Facilities - - -
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 9,324.069 - - 9,324,069
r Other Assets at Cast Less Amortvation - - - -
Sub-Total 12,499,101 - - 12,499,101
r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 13.316,806 $ 336,054 $ - $ 13,652,860
r
Section 4-Page 9
r
I ',
1999-00 Third Quarter Report w
Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000 �•i
Operating Budget Review I
1999-00 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Li
Budget Date Budget %of Budget
REVENUES:
�+
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - 8 - $ - -
Connection Fees - -Other Fees - 4,041 (4,041) - V
Sale of Capacity Rights - - - -
Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 684,000 217,850 466,150 31.85% -
Total Revenues $ 684,000 $ 221,891 $ 462,109 32.44%
Y4
OUTLAYS:
Shan;of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP $ 1.788.000 $ 714.467 $1,073.533 39.96% W
Revenue Area Trunk Sewer Construction 6,00D 248.774 (242,774) 4146.23% _
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 160,000 130,720 29.280 81.70% 1
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.184,000 981,027 202,973 82.86% 1.1
Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 213,500 468,085 (254.685) 219.24%
Total Outlays $ 3,351.600 $ 2.543,073 $ 808,427 75.88% I I
Capital Facilities Budget Review
1601
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
07101199 &Additions Fixed Assets 03/31100
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Revenue Area Construction in Progress $ 49,976 $ 248,774 $ - $ 298,750
Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 1,738,482 714.467 - 2.452,949 1
Sub-Total 1,788,458 963,241 - 2,751,699
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT: '
Land and Property Rights - - _ _ �I
Collection Lines and Pump Stations 25,602,567 - - 25,602,567
Treatment Facilities -
Disposal Facilities - _ _ -
General Plant and Administrative Facilities 6,747 - - 6,747
Equity in Joint Treatment Facilities 20,124,895 - = 20,124,895
Other Assets at Cost Less Amortization - _
Sub-Total 45,734,209 - - 45.734.209
Total Properly,Plant&Equipment&CIP $47,522,667 $ 963.241 $ - $48,485,908 y�
I
V
Section 4-Page 10 ICI
u
Self Insurance Review
General Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
r Pena
Acted of Budget Retaining Aeod
1999-N Thmgh Through 1999.00 Thmgh h eme
r Budget 03r."/00 0331N0 Budget OY31M (Deaeme)
1. Beginning Reserves $1.981,193 $1,592,701 WA WA $2.059,473 $ (466.772)
r Revenues
2. In-Lieu Preiiunn - - WA - -
r 3. lift t&h$soell m 100,000 40,438 40.44% 59,562 76,274 (35,8W)
4. Allocation hom OOwr Funds 700,000 437,629 6262% 2BZ371 306= 131,346
r
5. TOW Revenues 800,000 478,067 59.76% 321,933 382,557 95,510
r
r 6. Salaries.Wages and BemBls - - WA - - -
7. gemfi6A7aim 166,000 179,232 108.63% (14,232) 149,084 30.148
r 8. Contractual Services 3,500 981 28.03% Z519 1,394 (413)
9. Legal Services 500,000 395,712 79.14% 104,288 440,454 (44,742)
m' 10. Professional Services 3.OD0 Z130 71.OD% 970 1,068 1,052
11. %ppbw&UJ er 500 177,614 3552280% (177,114) (16) 177,630
r 12 Sub-TOW Expems 67ZODO 755.669 112.45% (83,889) 591,964 163,685
13. Beese Loss Pormy 120,000 83,619 69.66% 36,381 63,619
r
14, Total Expenses 79ZODO a39,288 105.97% (47288) 675,603 163,605
r
15. Eaeses Revemm(Elgtemes) 8,000 (381,221) 4515.26% 369,221 (293,046) (68,175)
r 16. Ending Reserves $1,989,193 $1.231.480 61.91% WA $1,766.427 $ (534,9471
r
r
r Section 5-Page 1
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2000
Percent Ld
Actual of Budget Rerroirting Actual
1999-00 Through Through 19".00 Through Increase
Budget CY31M 03131/00 Budget CY31M (Decrease)
u
1. Beginning Reserves $ 520,052 $ 812,383 WA WA $ 563,272 $ 249.111
Revenues
2. In-Lieu Pnmuums 310,000 232,496 75.00% 77,504 164,250 68,246 -
3. Interest BMiscellaneous 25.000 14.957 59,83% 10,043 19,923 (4,9W W
4, Total Revemlas 335,000 247,453 73.87% 87.547 184,173 63,280
11�1
Expenses
4i
5. Salaries.Wages and Bereft - _ NIA _ _ _
6. BenditaCia ms 225,000 240,062 106.69% (15,062) 147,453 92,609 l
7. Contractual Services 25,000 18.750 75.00% 6,250 - 18,760
8. Legal Services 27.000 22.218 8229% 4,782 9,671 12,547 64
9. Professional Services 30,000 32,505 108.35% (2,506) 12,023 20,483
10. Supplies&Otter 34.677 WA (34,677) 34,677 V
11. Sub-Total Expenses 307,000 348,213 113.42% (41,213) 169,147 179,066
12. Excess Loss Policy 22,500 16,023 7121% 6,477 116,290 (267) v
13. Total Expenses 329,500 364.236 110.54% (34,736) 185,437 178,799 l
L.I
14. Excess Revenue(Expanded) 5,500 (116.783) -2123.33% 122.283 (1,264) (115,519) -
W
15. Ending Reserves $ 525.552 $ 695,600 132.35% WA $ 562.008 $ 133,592
V
Ir
v
Li
Section 5-Page 2
i
tJ
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
General Management Administration (Division 110)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure treatment cost does $482/MG 5495/MG Costs slightly above Gallonage charge due
not exceed target by end of to flows being lower by 3.7%compared to
fiscal year original budget projections.
Ensure District meets 517.26 FTEs by 506.75 FTEs As of 3130/00.
adopted 3-year staffing end of fiscal year
plan
Maintain 1 D3%Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
with Permit Compliance
Deliver 80%of Engineering 80% 44% Expenditures well under target through mid-
(capital projects)CORF year. $34.3M spent versus$78.5M
Budget by end of year CORF/Collections system budget.
Expenditures are anticipated to increase
during latter half of fiscal year as significant
construction gets underway.
Ensure District Performance 80% 75%Performance Performance objectives have neatly been met
Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives during the first six months. Workplan
milestones met within Objectives 63%Workplan milestone tasks are behind in some areas,
targets 80%Workplan Milestones(see largely due to prior Y2K efforts and the
Milestones Summary) Huntington Beach Closure Project. Note that
with GM approval,a few scheduled workplan
tasks were delayed to next fiscal year given
appropriate justification.
Total District-Wide Not
Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
Tracked
Through 9 Months
246 155 68 23 63%of Workplan tasks that were scheduled
through 9 months of FY 99/00 were
completed. A few of these tasks were
deferred per the General Manager. Please
see individual division sections for additional
details on activities behind schedule.
Section 6- Page 1
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Administration (Division 210)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data —�
Average Rate of Return 5.1% 5.8% The portfolios outperformed their respective
on Liquid Portfolio Index benchmarks.
Average Rate of Return 3.8% 4.7% The portfolios outperformed their respective
on Long-term Portfolio benchmarks.
Index
Average Interest Rate 2.75% 2.73% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met.
Paid on variable(COP)
Borrowing
r
General liability cost:% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met.
Premiums compared to .60% .25% -
Operating Budget
Workers Comp insurance
cost: %premiums 1.50% 1.03% Lower than target is desirable. Benchmark met,
compared to Payroll
r
Remain at or under the $44.0 Million by $32.8 Million over 9 Expenses below 75%"9 month target"
net Joint Operating (J.O.) end of fiscal months(74.6%total)
year
Workplan Tasks
Not
3f°Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 4 0 Delays due to consultants'work slightly
behind schedule and slight delays obtaining
Board approvals.
Section 6 - Page 2
Performance Objectives
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Accounting (Division 220)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Issue monthly financial First month(July)missed which is typical
reports within 10 working 92% 78% due to end-0I-year processing. Delay in
days Jan.due to Y2K-related work. We expect
remaining months to be on schedule.
Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end 90% This work to be completed in 4th quarter.
study
Complete Policy and 100%by year end 60% 60%progress with expectation of
Procedures Manual completion by years end.
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 3 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
Section 6- Page 3
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 9 Months
Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 97.91% 9-month cycle counting program met
program Rating benchmark target.
Complete by Completed Completed successfully.
Implement Outreach 4/00
Program
Implement Procurement Complete by Pilot Program Pilot program still underway.
Card Program 2100
Develop Master Contracts Complete by Completed Completed
for consultants/services 3/00
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data —
5 4 1 0 One training program slightly behind
schedule.
Section 6 - Page 4
Performance Objectives
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT
Communications(Division 310)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Target achieved.
Turnaround Time 100%of time
Board Minute Preparation 10 day 91% Target missed due to vacation during one
Turnaround Time turnaround month.
100%of time
Photowpying Services 93%+ 93% Target achieved.
Satisfaction
Graphics Services 95%+ 96% Target achieved.
Satisfaction
Visitor Tour Satisfaction 65%+ 95% Target achieved.
Rating
Workplan Tasks. - Not
3i0 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks wmpleled.
Section 6-Page 5
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
HR & EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 510) —
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Address employee 90%within 3 100%within 1.4 days Target exceeded.
development requests days
HR Department managed 90-100%of 71%expended through Target met,
within budget budget 9 months
Achieve 3-year staffing plan 517.25 FTE's by 506.75 FTE's through 9 This is well below our end-of-year target.
projections years end months
Ensure Department 90% 98% Target met.
achieves 90%+of budget r
performance objectives
r
Workplan Tasks Not
310 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data —
7 5 2 0 Completion of 501 negotiations behind
desired schedule.
r
r
Section 6- Page 6
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Technical Services Administration (Division 610)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Ensure divisions' 85%, 87.5% Exceeds benchmark target.
performance objectives are
met.
Ensure divisions'budget 90-100%of budget 97.1%(annualized) Target met through 9 months.
expenditures are managed
Workplan Tasks - Not
30 Quarter Complete - Behind Started .Summary of Data
1 0 1 0
Internal operations study of department
slightly behind schedule.
.. Section 6-Page 7
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Conduct NPDES-related 100%of time 100% Target met.
core ocean monitoring
sampling
Ensure workplan project 95%of Deadlines 100% Target met.
milestones completed on rr
time.
Ensure NPDES required 100% 100% Target met.
reports/data submitted on
time
Ensure spill incidents 100% 100% Target met.
reported on time. r
Workplan Tasks Not
3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
7 3 4 0 V
Tasks behind related to information
technology implementations and dairy
project issues.
r
r
Section 6 - Page 8
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
_ Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Maintain monthly sample 90%+of norm 90% Target met.
testing productivity at/above
Multi-agency benchmark
parameters.
Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 90% Target met
testing productivity within norm
10%of FY 98/99 in-house
productivity standard.
Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 100%on 1st analysis Target met.
on laboratory samples tat analysis;
100%on 2nd
Turnaround time on 90%to 110%of 90% Internal standards established in November,
analyses established '98. Turnaround times standard met.
none
Workplan Tasks Not
Yd Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed.
r
Section 6 - Page 9
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source Control (Division 640)
Performance Objective 199mo Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Maintain field inspection 2.6 monitoring 2.8 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note,
productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods
data is for 2nd quarter of FV 99100.
Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal.
actions within 30 days of
non-compliance event
Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal.
permits prior to expiration _
Implement Technical Complete 90+% 100%completed Milestone targets met.
Resource Program of milestones on
time
Workplan Tasks Not
3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
6 2 4 0 Detailed review of draft ordinance behind
schedule due to EPA delays.
Section 6-Page 10 ..
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Safety & Emergency Response (Division 650)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 97% Customer Service remains a division
wRhin 2 work days priority.
Ensure Injury Incidence is 6.5 incidence 9.3 This target has not been met due to an
24%below industry rate increase in frequency of accidents
average requiring time off. Additional emphasis
being provided on"safe work practices.'
Lost Work Day Case 3.5 incidence 5.6 This target has not been met due to an
Incidence Rate 42%below rate increase in frequency of accidents
industry average requiring time off. Additional emphasis
being provided on'safe work practices'
Workers Compensation $403 $271 Costs were negligible due to type of
Cost Factor 30%below accidents that did occur requiring limited
industry average medical cost payments.
Workplan Tasks Not
3i0 Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
0 0 0 1 0 Not applicable this quarter.
Section 6-Page 11
1999-00 Third Quarter Report
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
(Division 7101720')
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Manage Capital Projects 80%. 44% Expenditures well under target through 9
CORF Budget expended by months. $34.3 spent versus$78SM
year's end CORF/Collections system budget.
Expenditures are anticipated to increase
during latter half of fiscal year as significant
construction gets underway. Final target for
CIP may be 67%of initial budget.
Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 85% 677 projects bid on schedule.
established Capital
Improvement Program
schedule
Meet design project 80%.of time 71% Approaches target benchmark as 63/89
milestones project milestones completed.
Meet Division 710/720/730 Less than 74% Target met for 9-month expenditure trend.
JO budgets 100%
expended
Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% Target met.
correspondence within 30
working days
Workplan Tasks Not
3' Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data w
5 3 0 2 Some training and sections of policies and
procedures manual delayed.
'Note that Engineering Admin. and Planning&Design Division have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 12
Performance Objectives
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Construction Management (Division 730)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 9 Months
Target Change Order costs 5% 4.54% Change order costs are always based on a
at no greater than 5%of running average of the preceding four
original contract amount quarters. Target has been met.
(industry standard=7.25%)
Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 45%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on a
Occupancy in facilities days 55%-240 days running average of the preceding four
within targets 40%-within 240 quarters.The target was not achieved
days based on the rolling average utilizing 9
projects.
Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 4% Target has been met based on OC
Inspections and average no inspections.
more 10%correctable
deficiencies
Conduct submittal reviews 80%of time or 97% Target has been exceeded.
within 20 days greater
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
2 1 1 0 Training task completed one month behind
schedule.
Section 6- Page 13
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Administration (Division 810) ..
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure Operations $308/million $325/million gallons Exceedence due to lower than anticipated
treatment cost per million gallons treated treated flows partially due to dryer winter
gallons does not exceed conditions. r
target
Ensure O&M division 96.100Mo 104.55% (annualized) Annualized target near budgeted
budget's managed within expenditures.
appropriated expenditures
Ensure Total Injury 16.3 11.4 Target met.
Frequency Rate 25%or (or less)
more below industry
average
Ensure three-year staffing 206.25 FTEs by 202 FTEs Target met.
plan figures are met end of year
Workplan Tasks Not
3" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data —
0 0 0 0
Not applicable this quarter.
Section 6 - Page 14
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Operations& Maintenance Processing Support (Divisions 8201870')
Performance Objective 199mo Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100% Total contracts Natural gas and biosolids hauling expenses
biosolids and oxygen within budget managed at 107.3%for increased contracts slightly above target.
contracts are managed 9-month period
within budget (annualized).
Ensure milestones are 80%+of Nine 100% Project milestones met.
completed on assigned
projects
Respond to Engineering 90%within 95% Target met.
Capital Project Review deadline
Requests
Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.05 Target met.
kilowatt hour($/kWh)
Maintain therms/kWh at .111 therms/kWh .106 therms/kWh- Within targeted parameters.
Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1
(kilowatt hour)within .106 therms/kWh .102 therms/kWh-
targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2
Maintain FERC efficiency at 42%or greater 66% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit
Central Generation plants requirements.
within targeted limits
Workplan Tasks Not
3m Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
4 2 2 0 Project delays due to Y2K effort and RFP
requirements.
*Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 15
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Plant Operations (Divisions 8301840) —
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 73% Plant 1 Target met.
Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 72%Plant 2
Process
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 44%Plant 1 Problems related to P1 trickling
(BOD) Removal Targets in Primary 43%>at Plant 2 43%Plant 2 filter process areas impacting
Treatment Process performance.
Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 20%at Plant 1 (1 21% Plant 1 Higher than expected due to
total leave hours taken does not exceed hour overtime per 27% Plant 2 lower than authorized staffing
targets 5 hours leave levels.
taken)
25%at Plant 2
Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 3%Plant 1 See above.
does not exceed targets salary 3.3%Plant 2
Workplan Tasks Not _
3" Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 1 1 1 Delays pending negotiations
resolution and the impact of V21K
program preparation.
Section 6 - Page 16
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 850/860)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Months Summary of Data
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 43.1% Commitment to project-related activities,
Time in Mechanical particularly J-42, reinvention and capital
Maintenance Division project support, reduces direct wrench time
percentages.
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 42.6% Commitment to project-related activities,
Time in Electrical& particularly J-42,reinvention and capital
Instrumentation Division project support,reduces direct wrench time
percentages.
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 53.3%
Time/Direct Support Time See above.
in Mechanical Maintenance
Division
Ensure 60%Wrench 60% 54.4% See above.
Time/Direct Support Time
in Electrical&
Instrumentation Division
Ensure preventive <90% 74.3% Target met.
maintenance backlog in
Mechanical Maintenance is
less than 100
Ensure preventive <90% 42.2% Target met.
maintenance backlog in
Electrical&Instrumentation
is less than 100%
Workplan Tasks Not
3w Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
9 2 3 4 Internal projects related to mapping
operational systems have been delayed.
Section 6 - Page 17
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Air Quality & Special Projects (Division 880)
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance Through
Target 9 Months Summary of Data —
Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target.
deadlines
Ensure wllections sulfide 80-100% 77%projected for 12 Performance objective is slightly below
control managed within months target.
budget
Ensure PSA/contractual 80-100% 73%projected for 12 Performance objective is slightly below
services managed within months target.
budget
Workplan Tasks Not —
V Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. —
Section 6- Page 18
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Facilities/Collections Divisions (420/430')
Performance Objective 1999-00 Target Performance
Through 9 Summary of Data
Months
Ensure contractor performs 80%-100%of 66%(458.272 linear Contractor has improved since last quarter
within contract guidelines for Zone 7 line cleaning desired linear ft. fl) although still below target.
Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 83% Target met.
Pump Stations meets or
exceeds target
Ensure that collections 90%+spots 88% Approaches targeted parameter.
trouble spots are cleaned on
maintained on schedule schedule
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 75% Target exceeded.
Fleet Maintenance Division
meets or exceeds target
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 73o Target exceeded.
Rebuild Shop meets or
exceeds target
Ensure planned/preventive 75% Planned 8 68%Preventive Corrective work higher than expected
maintenance to corrective Preventive 32%Corrective although improvement noted since last
maintenance ratios meets Maintenance quarter.
targets 25%Corrective
Maintenance
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter Complete i Behind Started Summary of Data
6 3 3 0 Delays on tasks project complications related
to J-02 needs and CMMS improvement
requirements.
*Note that Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 19
1999-00 Third Quarter Report -
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 910193019401950')
Performance Objective 1999-00 Performance
Target Through 9 Months Summary of Data —
Resolve all help desk calls 75%within 3 62% Y2K focus resulted in delays.
days
Plant radio,PBX and 98%+ 99.97%Radio Target met.
Network"Up-time 1000/0 PBX
99.25%Network
Database 'Up-time 95%+ 99.86% Target met.
Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100%=Plant 1 Target met.Lms -
'Up-lime plants 100%=Plant 2
Workplan Tasks Not
V Quarter complete Behind Started Summary of Data
6 4 1 1 GIS and seventy console projects slightly
behind.
`Note that Information Technology divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. —
Section 6-Page 20
Orange County Sanitation District
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
OCSD 3/31/00