Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-04-26 toApril 19, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT phone: NOTICE OF MEETING :IZt a]9s ph mailing address: BOARD OF DIRECTORS P.O. Box 8127 rcunteln Valley.CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9272E-B127 alls a10 EliAve WEDNESDAY, April 26, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. Pountain Valley,CA 92708-7016 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies • Cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Pountain Valley Fullerton Gordan Grora Bo I Secrete Hundnpan Beech Irvine La Habra Le Palma Las Alamitos Newport Beech Oran, Placenta Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Sena Ana Seal Beach saanan Tustin OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, May 3,2000 at 5:00 p.m. Villa Perk YONra Linda County or Orange PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, May 4,2000 at 5:00 p.m. FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, May 10,2000 at 5:00 p.m. sanitary Districts Costa Mee. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Midway city SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE . Monday, May 15,2000 at 5:00 p.m.@OCWD Water Oistritts STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, May 24,2000 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch "ro Pr°tact the Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Wastewater Sysams" BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting May May 24, 2000 June June 28, 2000 July *July 19, 2000 August August 23, 2000 September September 27, 2000 October October 25, 2000 November *November 15, 2000 December *December20, 2000 January January 24, 2001 February February 28, 2001 March March 28, 2001 April April 25, 2001 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:Iw .dW\admin%BSUgenda\2000 Meeting No0ms1MN4.2.dm AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING APRIL 26, 2000— 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 04/26/00 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on March 22, 2000 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/00 03/31/00 Totals $5,300.788.21 $3,946,010.00 CONSENTCALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Authorize the General Counsel to execute a quitclaim deed for a 15-foot wide by 213.77-foot long sewer easement to Plantero Drive LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, in a form acceptable to General Counsel. b. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District, providing for appointment of alternate Directors in lieu of the General Manager to the Joint Cooperative Committee. 04/26/00 Page 3 C. Amend Board Minutes of December 15, 1999 relative to approving a project with Ashbrook Corporation to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit at no cost to the District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an approximate cost of$125,000 contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4% improvement in cake solids. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 26, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meetings held on March 22, 2000 and April 3, 2000 to be filed. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-03, Declaring Support for Senate Bill 1956 (Polanco) Uniform Statewide Regulation of Biosolids Land Application. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re April 5, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 5, 2000 to be filed. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-04, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-05, Declaring Support for Biosolids Application, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-03. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re April 6, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 6, 2000 to be filed. 04/26/00 Page 4 c. (1) Approve a budget amendment increase of$84,931 to Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,166,205; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of$1,034 and 69 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $717.866; and (3) Accept Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1,with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of$130,622 and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,593,409. e. Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, for an addition of $552,000, increasing the total contract amount to $10,057,256. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for on-call computer services necessary to update and maintain computer models developed under the 1999 Strategic Plan, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000. g. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for design and study of Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-67, for a total amount not to exceed $283,280. h. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4, for an amount not to exceed $845,300. 1. (1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers for professional engineering services for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $308,212; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$2,594,000 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for a total project budget of$3,394,000. j. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements, Contract No. 2-50, for a total amount not to exceed $504,685. k. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C. for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25.1, providing for additional consulting services in the amount of$459,703 for a total amount not to exceed $2,788,384. 04/26/00 Page 5 I. Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$420,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $5,516,830. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re April 12, 2000 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION,AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 12, 2000 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of March 2000. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-06, Authorizing Formation of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation and Authorizing Certain Related Actions. e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-07, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33. Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re March 20 and April 17, 2000 meetings. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment system Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 20, 2000 to be filed. 16, Approve License Agreement with the Orange County Water District for the construction and operation of Water Factory 21 Groundwater Injection Well and Conveyance Facilities from the Orange County Water District, at no cost to the District, in form approved by General Counsel. 17. Approve consolidation of Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 for fiscal year 2001-01, including the postponement of portions of user fee increases previously adopted through 2001-02. 18. (1) Verbal staff report; (2) Establish May 24. 2000 at 7:00 P.M. at the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time, and place, for the public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 241; and (3) Establish May 31, 2000, as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 241. 04/26foo Page 6 19. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(c)). 2. Evaluation of General Manager's performance (Government Code Section 54957). 3. Confer with General Counsel and District's designated representative (Chair Jan DeBay) re salary, compensation and benefits to be paid to the new General Manager, Blake P. Anderson (Government Code Section 54957.6). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Adjournment 04/26/00 Page 7 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 H.\ pall gei a%Baard Age dasr Board Aqe as`Bi2 .dm Speech before the Board of Directors April 26, 2000 Introduction: 1.) Good evening everyone, Members of the Board, Council. 2.) My name is Emilio Ariston, I am a Senior Mechanic in Dept. 850 and I've been employed by the District's for 11 1/2 years. Statement of Business: L)* I'm here before you this evening to address the Grievance that I filed against the Acting Human Resource Director, Lisa Tomko and the Maintenance Manager, Simon Watson on December 28, 1999 (for the Unfair Problem Solving Procedure) which Ms. Tomko denied and returned to me. 2.)* I fimily believe that my grievance is legitimate and this to be another blatant act of Retaliation against me because of my challenging of the October 1998, recruitment procedure. Discrimination (backg of und): la.)* In October of 1998 I challenged a recruitment procedure in which I believe I was discriminated against by a panel that included Simon Watson, Chuck Forman, Patty Steeves, Larry Kramer and Jim Harris. lb.)* When one of the interview panelists, Chuck Forman deviated from the written questions, this aroused my suspicions and I requested an investigation be conducted. le.)* Mike Peterman the former Human Resource Director suggested that Jeff Reed (one of his Human Resource Staff) conduct this investigation. I agreed with the stipulation that Bernie DeAnda (a 501 Shop Steward) be present during all questioning. Mr. Peterman agreed. Mr. DeAnda was unable to be present during Mr. Watson's questioning so Alan Dumlao; (another 501 Shop Steward) stood in for him. 2a.)* Mr. Peterman stated that in the investigation, it was discovered that the test scores in which I scored approximately 25% higher than the selected incumbent were thrown out. 2b.)* Upon my request Mr. Peterman provided me with the test and interview scores from the first interview along with his signature. 3.)* I filed a Complaint with the E.E.O.C. that is still on going. 4.)* Since than I have experienced Retaliation, Harassment and Work place Violence which are All Clearly Defined in the District's Policies and Procedures to be Punishable up to and including Termination. Retaliation: la.)* On February 10, 1999 I was denied by Mr. Watson the opportunity to work scheduled overtime while on Standby, on a job that I had been working on during that day. Another Mechanic from a different assigned area was offered the overtime instead. lb.) In past practice the Standby Mechanic has been allowed to work scheduled over-time up until me being denied. It has also been allowed after me. Harassment: la.)* On February 19, 1999 at approximately 9:OOam I was approached by Mr. Watson and Harassed. Mr. Watson stated that for the three hours that we've been here it appears that nothing has been done in the Dewatering area and he didn't know the details but, it appears that we're not getting our jobs done and that he has been out in our area and knows where we were. lb.) He also told Roy Hendy that he needed to be more focused. Written Warning Issued: la.)* On November 12, 1999 the day in question, Mr. Watson alleges he found me to sleeping on duty. He issued me a Written Warning (dated November 16, 1999) on November 18, 1999. lb.) As I tried to explain my innocence, Mr. Watson stated that I would have to take it up with Human Resources through the Problem Solving Procedure. He did not even care to discuss this matter. lc.) He just kept on insisting that I sign this memorandum, persistently shoving it in front of me. I explained to Mr. Watson that I didn't think it was in my best interest to sign anything at this time. Id.) This appeared to frustrate him as he stated, "you have to sign it" once again shoving the memorandum in front of me. I told Mr. Watson that I was feeling harassed by his actions. le.) He then asked John Radka (my Supervisor) and Karl Nordgren (my Lead man) to sign as witnesses and they did. Problem Solving Procedure: 1a.)* During the Problem Solving Procedure when I requested to present my witnesses, Ms. Tomko stated that she didn't think that we would have to go that far. lb.)* As I maintained my innocence and pointed out to Ms. Tomko that Mr. Watson had proven nothing by presenting only his subjective allegations, his opinion and a blank note pad. lc.)* Ms. Tomko stated that Mr. Watson's charges against me were very hard to prove, but since I chose to dispute his charges that the "Burden of proof' was on me. Id.)* I truly believe that even with Ms. Tomko's prejudicial bias against me, that I still presented a preponderance of evidence substantiating my innocence and discrediting Mr. Watson's subjective allegations. Grievance Procedure: la.)* According to ARTICLE 11 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE (first paragraph), a Grievance Is Any Complaint that Management has Violated a Specific Provision of This Agreement, except that in accordance with Article 10 above, discipline which requires a Notice of Intent may not be reviewed under this Grievance Procedure. lb.)* Contrary to the District General Counsel's interpretation of the District and 501 Agreement and advice to Ms. Tomko and the General Manager, Donald F. McIntyre, since the Discipline issued to me by Mr. Watson did not require a Notice of Intent and Ms.Tomko's Violation of ARTICLE 12 PROBLEM SOLVING PROCEDURE, (as She Clearly Did Not Encourage and Facilitate the Resolution of my Concerns in a Responsive or Fair Manner), in Accordance with the MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING between the District and the LOCAL 501, this is a LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCE. Acceptable Resolution: 1.) I Afforded Everyone an Equal Opportunity to Provide Acceptable Resolution, from Mr. Watson, Mr. Peterman, Ms. Tomko, Mr. Ooten Mr. Anderson and Mr. McIntyre but to no avail. Councilwoman Pat McGuigan: la.)* I even contacted Board Member, Councilwoman Pat McGuigan by Telephone and then by Certified Mail. At first she seemed Genuinely Concerned with my Situation. I asked her for written response to my letter and she said yes, but she wanted to speak with Blake Anderson first. lb.)* The last contact I received from Councilwoman McGuigan was when she called my home and told me that she had been advised by General Counsel "Not To Get Involved". lc.) I then asked her if she would still provide me with a written response regarding this matter. She stated that Counsel had also advised her, Not to Give Me Anymore Documentation Because I Already Have Enough. I was Flattered. She did however, suggest that I attend the next Board Meeting to address you with this Matter. Id.) I don't believe that "Do not get involved" was the best advice to give, after all the Board of Directors are the fifth step of the Grievance Procedure. Blake Anderson's Request to Meet: la.)* On April 4, 2000 I received a phone message from Jean Tappan requesting for me to meet with Blake Anderson the following week. lb.) That afternoon I e-mailed her requesting more information regarding this meeting so I could prepare for it. ic.) Ms. Tappan stated in her response, that Blake wanted to talk with me regarding my request for a hearing before the Board of Directors. Id.)* On April 11, 20001 followed up with an e-mail to Mr. Anderson. I informed him that I would be in training until 4:OOpm and planned to check my e-mail before the end of the day. He did not respond. Closing Statement: 1.)* At this time I am Requesting a Written Response as to How You the Board of Directors, a Governing Body, Intend to Hold Everyone Involved, Accountable for Their Actions of Retaliation, Harassment, Workplace Violence, Gross Misconduct, Lack of Due Diligence, Negligent Intervention and Prejudicial Bias Against Me. 2.)* Members of the Board, I strongly urge that you make a recommendation to Management to Reconsider Their Decision (only to Reduce from a Written Warning to a Verbal Warning), to completely Exonerating me from Any and All Charges made Against me by Mr. Watson. ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 04/26/00 TIME: 7:00 gm. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... f✓ / — (FLORY) .......................... BANrHFAD..................._ ✓� ✓ _ (SNOW) ........................... BOYD............................✓ — (CRANDALL) ................... CARR07ZO................. ✓ 7 _ (MOORE) ......................... DAUCHER..................... ✓ — (THOMSON) .................... DEBAY..........................1` ai — (DOTSON) ....................... DONAHUE..................... Ot-� 0L.- — (MAERTZWEILER)........... ECKENRODE................. ✓ �/ — (PERRY)........................... FERRYMAN................... — (GAROFALO)................... GREEN......................... — (SCHWING)...................... GULLIXSON................... ✓ _,L — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................r✓ J[ — (DALY)............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ ✓ — (LUTZ).............................. MC GUIGAN.................. ✓ — (SPURGEON)................... MURPHY...................... ✓ ✓ (RICE)............................... NEUGEBAUER.............. (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. I/ ✓ — (KEENAN)......................... PIERCY........................ (POTTS)........................... SALTARELLI.................. ✓ �- — (SMITH, GREG) ............... SHEA........................... ✓ (MAULLER)...................... SIGLER......................... ✓ — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... ✓ 7 — (MILLER).......................... ........................... 7 7 — (BATES) ........................... SYLVIA......................... 77- 17 — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... 7` — STAFF: Anderson / Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin McIntyre / Miles Ooten Tomko Streed Tuchman OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus 03/22/00 H1wp.dtaladndn$SM)IRECTORMtraotora Roll Call.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 4 Z © AGENDA ITEM NO. _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ,� /0 HOME ADDRESS: �b /v ' DLL/ )/`'; S + (number/street) Sa y 4z? APA, (2270 3 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: JL'� (selflname of organization) H:Wvp.Ela\admin\BS\FORMS\Requeat to Spmk.eeo REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. �j DATE: �f}32Y '/ AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) S a rI GC r. L HOME ADDRESS: (g 9(p (number/street) `kes-�?' (cit//fyylzip code) / c TELEPHONE: 17/(/ ) 7S/Y — 0 o �� REPRESENTING: Zek9h-, 6,1,4. Ca- C (selftname of organization) H:\wo.dta`admK8ST0RMS\R"uest to Smk.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: A1107'G /moo AGENDA ITEM NO.. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) % L /�%GFf'C-.CSC HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) ( 'ty/zip cod ) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) HAwp.dtMadmJMBST0RMSVPequW W Speek.dx REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION. REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: .412 AGENDA ITEM NO. 'Z _ G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ("4R.\2 HOME ADDRESS: 4-11 mL!:) (number/street) NlcswPma-C �ae a E ,a (city/zip code) ty �( TELEPHONE: l'A l —I2—> REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) H:Wp.dta%admin\8ST0RMSRequeet to Speak.doc SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT /9�(Rr b BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) �A�1E eiNE �iELE CX� So � �•� r.. E LO a 12D Vj Cs lio/rn ANT C. �/ o,✓ c �I;� I�arv�^ Carol l e5 {tUrhff Fifo {e Su NIA H 9WP.DTAWDMIN\BSIFORMSZIGN-IN FORM.DOO STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on April 26, 2000, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on April 20, 2000. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2& day of April, 2000. 4,�(A Penny M. K , Secrets Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HAWRDMADMINIBSWORMSIAGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA �4a p9G o 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 3010, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92842 Bm<e A.B.Wd .w .... Afvyor William 1.Dallon h/%or?-T— (714) 741-5100 No Chung C Ku.—' Mark U,y April 25. 2000 Coy '&'— Mark Rosen The Honorable Jan DeBay. Chair C-11 1 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: Financial Consolidation of and Development of a SinGle User Fee Rate for Revenue Areas 1. 2. 3. 5. 6,11, and 13 Dear Chairwoman DeBay: After careful consideration. Garden Grove continues to be concerned about the negative financial impact to residents in Revenue Area 3 caused by the single user fee proposal . In an effort to avoid these impacts, and as an alternative to pursing a uniform rate at this time, Garden Grove proposes the following alternatives for consideration: • Apply all identifiable savings generated by the consolidations of the districts to keep rates lower in Districts 1 and 7. • Allow the poorer revenue areas to borrow funds with OCSD acting as the banker. The funds could be paid back at a lower interest rate. • Investigate payment of a user fee for governmental facilities who presently receive services without charge. • Establish a uniform operating rate and separate capital rate related directly to the capital need in each area. As there has been no discussion of these alternatives. I am requesting that staff prepare an analysis of the feasibility and impacts of each of the above alternatives for Board review. Further. I am requesting that this item be continued to allow for further discussion regarding this highly complicated Issue. Sincerer Mares Councilmember SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108"ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING April 26, 2000-7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event.any.matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, if will be done in compliance with Section 549542(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: a. Authorizing consideration of Item 21(b) and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. Verbal report of Director of Technical Services C. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Orange and the City of Huntington Beach re future procedures and continuing beach closure investigations as originally authorized by Board action of January 26,2000. Wwp.dra\agendMBoard Agendas\2000 Board Agendas 2600supplerrerdal.doc sent by: PFHD DIH. 714 834 2395; 04/25/00 4:19PM;JgIF1ax k327;Page 215 e 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG COUNTY OF ORANGE,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 25,2000 Problem Statement Bacterial contamination of local coastal waters from known and unknown sources. Purpose Statement The purpose of this document is to clarify roles and responsibilities of the County of Orange, the City of Huntington Beach and the Orange County Sanitation District with regard to coastal water quality and urban runoff management studies. Ongoing Studies The County of Orange,City of Huntington Beach,and Orange County Sanitation District,together with the National Water Research Institute,coutmcled with UCI to perform sampling studies to determine whether urban runoff from the Talbert Marsh is a predominant source of contamination to local coastal waters. In addition, the three agencies have jointly contractod with two consulting firms in a cooperative study to expand on the work accomplished by others,investigate further the experiences of the summer beach postingsiclosures of 1999 and develop specific corrective actions. Action Plan The County of Orange will take the lead role in the development of watershed study groups,and in securing partnerships and financial commitments from cities,the state and federal government. The County of Orange will review and coordinate the ongoing study efforts. All agencies will work to gamer legislative and focal support from the State and Federal governments to further local efforts. Roles Solutions to coastal water quality problems are regional in nature,and require action from a variety of entities. Therefore,the three parties to this memorandum agree to the following roles: COUNTY Subject to the approval of the Board of Supervisors.the County of Orange will provide its fair share of financial support. DO_'ON010R7 AMCiTEMK%JE%tOR,%NDL:M OF rNDEa5TANDINn.J-c aerr uy: rrnu uin. 714 834 2395; 04/25/00 4:19PM;)atfjr_-g327;Page 3/5 W i • The County of Orange will continue in the lead role in coordinating with its NPOES co-permittees on urban runoff issues. • The County of Orange will assume the lead role in the development of a remediation action plan to provide recommendations for any regional measures to address needed coastal protection enhancements identified as a result of direct urban runoff or due to unique geophysical factors contributing to beach closures and/or postings caused by excessive bacteria levels. • The County of Orange will take the lead in working cooperatively with other agencies to support additional methods for educating the public about the impacts of urban runoff. • The County of Orange will participate in urban runoff educational sessions for city and special district staff members. • The County of Orange will host urban rurmff education sessions for elected - _. ..._ officials. CITY • Subject to the approval of the City Council, the City of Huntington Beach will provide its fair share of financial support • The City of Huntington Beach will assume the lead role in the development of remediation actions required for maintenance and modification of City sewer and local drainage infrastructure. • The City of Huntington Beach will assume the lead role by hosting urban runoffeducational sessions for city and special district staff members. • The City of Hundngton Beach will work cooperatively with other agencies to support watershed planning and additional methods for educating the public about the impacts of urban runoff. SANITATION DISTRICT • Subject to the approval of its Board of Directors,the Orange County Sanitation District will provide its fair share of financial support. • The Sanitation District will coordinate with its member agencies,including the City of Huntington Beach and the County,and with other agencies on urban runoff issues and work cooperatively to support requests for diverting dry season runoff to the sanitary sewer system. • The Sanitation District will participate in and work cooperatively with other agencies to support watershed planning and additional methods for educating the public about the impacts of urban runoff. This document is intended as a Program Level Memorandum of Understanding. More formal and technical agreemems will be developed for specific projects. W-OM lae)AMC'TEMMMEMORANOUM OF UNDERSTANDInGAW • � ••�� , uaieoiuu a:eut'N;/arFu N327;Page 4/5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING to be executed by their officers thereunto duly authorized on the date fast above written. COUNTY OF ORANGE Dare: By: Vicki L. Wilson,Director Public Facilities&Resources Deparunent APPROVED AS TO FORM: LAURENCE M.WATSON, COUNTY COUNSEL/ By: I 4I do u Deputy Date CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation Date: By: Ray Silver,City Administrator Dam: By: Dave Garofalo,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: GAIL HUTTON. CITY ATTORNEY By: Date e4llOMIQ:l7.WCiTEMK%tEAIORANDU?IOFUNDERSTANM.%G.4 c Sent by: PFRD DIR. 714 934 2395; 04/25/00 4:2DPM;jAIrzL—g327;Page 515 I� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ' Date: By Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager Date: By: Penny Kyle,Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, GENERAL COUNSEL By: Date OU26'00I0,17 AMC.ATMWME.% R NOUNI OF MDERSFANDINO.b K_ Look, up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a r plane! No, it's an Orange County San- itation District employee. That's right, it's our very own Joe Park,Jr. and sky- g' diving has become the No. 1 life- tt changing passion for him. - E m p I oye a About seven months ago,when Joe's life took an unexpected turn, he began to take skydiving lessons. "It was some- S p of l i g h t thing I always wanted to do. I needed a good kick in the pants to inspire me to live, rather than to just exist. So, I Joe Park jumped out of an airplane at 12,500 feet...and it worked!" remembers Joe. Mechanic It was very surprising to hear Joe's description of the feeling you get the moment Division 850 you JUMP OUTOFAN AIRPLANEAT 12,500 FEED! "There is no sensation of falling whatsoever when you step out of the plane," he explains. "You are moving forward at the same speed as the aircraft. You don't just fall straight down...you travel forward and down. It's a surreal experience. Jumping is the only thing you can do in your life that you have complete control of. It is 100% my choice. When I am in the door and ready to go, nothing can stop me." Through his skydiving lessons,Joe has learned to perform many airborne maneuvers such as the belly-first, delta-ing, 180s,360s, back flips and rolls using air friction. (If you want an explanation of all these things, you'll have to ask Joe.) "My ultimate goal is to learn to sky surf," says Joe, who just received his solo permit continued on page 6 Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Examined by Technical Experts by Bob Ghirelli,Director of Technical services Under the auspices of the USC Sea presentations from agencies involved inside: Grant Program, a nationwide panel of in the investigation. Sanitation District Y2K Co-Project microbiology, experts in the areas of presenters included Bob Ghirelli, microbiology, hydrodynamics, oceanog- Charlie McGee,Jeff Armstrong, George Leaders Recognized raphy. outfall design, and coastal water Robertson, Deirdre Hunter, Mark quality was convened in late February Esquer, and Nick Arhontes. Remote Control to conduct a technical review of the Plant Automation summer 1999 Huntington Beach The panel presented its preliminary closure investigations. The panel findings on the final day. New Warehouse was chaired by Dr. Steven Weisberg, at Plant No. 2 executive director of the Southern The panel's charge was to critique the California Water Research Project work that was done during the sum- Security Committee (SCWRP), mer. provide recommendations for Update improving the response to future The panel met for 2 'h days(Feb. 28, 29 events, and to suggest planning and and March 1). Initially, the panel was research priorities. taken on a tour of the affected area. On subsequent days, they heard continued on page 2 ww.a —l The Ne... eJ rnortn 2001 1it I years of service) Margarita Wl be moving to Chula Vista to be 1 closer 1 ing more doingthe N119S Joe Rycraw, (720) urrily. There she also runs a dry likes to 11 like going toVIO&BY 18 cleaning business with her brother. An Alaskan cruise is on the itinerary to take it easy and enjoy his hobbies. for her and her husband John. He'll definitely be out shooting hoops with his basketball buddies. We sure Nona Green,(Almost 25 years of service) Joe plans her it hope he has time to drop by and visit Service) Nona is now working as US. accounting coordinator for B/T Western Corporation. Easter Raffle on April 20 April 22 Marks the 3Oth First prize wins 6o%of net proceeds. Anniversary of Earth Day There are also two other great prize �,t Renewable energy is the \`11� to win. Purchase your candy -r - focus of this year's activities filled eggs containing raffle :��.y.. _- nationwide. Look for more ^` g tickets from any Employee details coming soon on how 1�� Activity Committee rep- the District plans to cele- resentative for$1 a piece, brace this event. You can earth day or$10 a dozen. Good Luck1 also visit www.earthday.net. 2000 Spotlight-continued from page 1 'Jumping is the best thing you'll ever He was hired on January 2, 1990 and medical team, said, 'Joe is the kind of do and it's simple to learn. It doesn't later promoted to his current position person who is always there to back take brains to jump out of a plane. In of senior mechanic. you up-either in or out of work. He my case, it took faith not courage." would literally give you the shirt off of His personal motto is "Soule Fidelis" Joe is a member of the odor control his back." or "Safe Through Faith." team and is also a search and rescue medical unit leader for the ICS medical Joe's dedication to helping others is "Everything you do in life is a risk. You team. He is one of two medical team not limited to his work at the plant. just need to put the odds in your favor members assigned to Plant No. 2. He would be more than willing to help as much as possible."says Joe. "If you About 18 months ago, the District sent others learn to skydive. If anyone at are feeling stressed out or depressed, Joe and several others to medical the District is interested,Joe is looking if thing's aren't going your way, or if training courses as part of the Hazmat for a partner not only to jump with, you lust need a new and different way search and rescue program for the but also to enter competitions with. of looking at things, take a dive out of purpose of providing interim medical While the cost of skydiving is high at an airplane. It is really beautiful up treatment in emergency situations until first,once you have completed the there." the paramedics arrive on the scene. lessons and purchased the equipment, the cost is very low-around$14 per Joe, a California native who spent "We were very well trained and we jump. Joe has already designed a the first 16 years of his life in Poway want to use our training to help custom helmet and is currently having (a small town near San Diego),cur- others,"said Joe, who spoke very a jump suit custom-made. Did you rently lives in Anaheim. After doing a highly of his fellow team members and know that 40%of those who jump on tour in the Navy,Joe began searching of their dedication to this assignment. the weekends are women? for something to do with his life. "We run toward a problem-not away from it. We don't want anyone to get Joe confided that, "One of my goals is Coincidentally, he had attended high hurt, but if that happens we are ready to get Blake Anderson to go up there school with Richard Pigmon's son and and willing to help," he added. with me. We have talked about it a had heard a lot about the District over lot" (Keep reading Pipeline...we'll be the years. When Richard told him that Dave Usher,who has worked with Joe the first to tell you whether Blake takes there was a job opening for a for six years and is a co-member of the up the challenge!) NP mechanic.Joe applied for the position. 1 i.. ..\ 7 .. 1. I b I Mer1A fop ITh M nN n P�_i m1wO W.wm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ) April 19, 2000 phone: To the Chair and Members (]14)982-2411 of the Board of Directors mailing add..: RU Bw 8127 Subject: Board Letter fb.,tar Valley.CA 92]2a-B12] .be. add.: The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional i o844 EllieVol.,.enae faunnformation on any of the items, please call me. 92 wh]B8-]B1818 Farewell Letter Mem ber I have included a letter to you in the attachments that describes the many issues we have addressed together since I first joined the District in March 1995, and to thank Agenda. 0 you for your support. cities Anaheim Orange County Survey Finds Support for Cleaning Up Coastal Waters Brae Buena Perk Cypress Cal State Fullerton's Center for Public Policy found Orange County voters are willing i .hta;n Way to pay more for cleaning up coastal waters but are less willing than the national PuOertaa surveygroup to a increased taxes for infrastructure improvements. The CSF Barden Grove 9 P pay P Huntington Beech survey, conducted in February-March of this year, found that, while cleaning up the 1'.ina coast mattered the most, Orange County voters were less interested than the Le Habra La Palm. national sample in spending money to guarantee safe and efficient sewage and Lou Alamitos water treatment systems. Orange County voters were generally pleased about ryewport Beach each airport service quality,the quality of drinking water, and the overall quality of Orange A.a.nde County infrastructure. The standout appears to be on water quality, where nearly half B.1 B oth of Orange Count survey respondents thought this aspect of their environment was steal aehch 9 Y Y P 9 P Stanton worsening over recent years, and 62%were willing to say they would support about w11a P rk 10/ extra in taxes to tackle the problem. Mcrbe Linde A copy of the press release announcing the survey results is attached. County of ar.nda Bank., pl...let. EPA Sludge Rule: Closed Minds or Open Debate?" Cctm Mae. Md.,sty On March 22, 2000, members of the House of Representatives Science Committee Water pl.erlcta held a hearing entitled "Sludge Rule: Closed Minds or Open Debate?"The hearing focused on allegations that the U.S. EPA has not only ignored some scientific Irvine Ranch findings that have questioned the adequacy of the Part 503 biosolids regulations, but also that some agency employees have been overly antagonistic toward critics of the rule. During the committee meeting, a report prepared by the Office of Inspector General for EPA titled Biosolids Management and Enforcement, was made public. The audit concluded that federal regulators cannot assure that biosolids applied to land under -To Protect the Public H..hh and the Environment through Excellence 11 Wasou—ar By-tame- Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 April 19, 2000 existing regulations is protective of human health and the environment. Specifically the report states that EPA does not"have an effective program' to ensure compliance with federal requirements. "EPA performs few biosolids related inspections of POTW operations, virtually no inspections of land application sites". The report does not address the scientific underpinnings of the Part 503 regulations; rather it criticizes the agency's oversight of the program. The executive summary of the report is attached for your review. Drawing the strongest protest from the committee was the alleged intimidation of a concerned citizen carried out by a senior scientist at EPA. A California dairy farmer testified that she received 10 unsolicited letters from Alan Rubin, a senior scientist in the EPA Office of Water. The dairy farmer perceived the letters to contain threats of increased regulation and federal inspections of her dairy farm. The Committee noted that Rubin's actions are a symptom of the EPA's increasingly defensive stance on the use of biosolids fertilizer. According to testimony given before the committee, EPA administrators have suppressed the opinions of EPA scientists and independent researchers and tried to discredit science that did not agree with the agency's safety assessments. Some committee members questioned whether EPA had a conflict of interest in both trying to promote the safe use of biosolids while also trying to regulate activities that could contaminate ground water and surface water. EPA is now faced with an internal investigation by the Office of the Investigator General, the agency's own policing office, into whether Dr. Rubin acted improperly in sending those letters. Bob Ooten Inaugurated as CWEA President Bob Ooten became president of the California Water Environment Association (CW EA)for a one-year term on April 16. CW EA is a non-profit association with 7000 members. The organization's mission is to enhance the education and effectiveness of California's wastewater professionals through training, certification, dissemination of technical information, and promotion of sound policies to benefit society through protection and enhancement of the water environment. Paul Simon's Book. "Tapped Out" As a result of the March Board Workshop on the Groundwater Replenishment System, several Directors have requested copies of Paul Simon's book, "Tapped Out,"for distribution to their cities' libraries. If you would like copies for similar distribution, please contact Michelle Tuchman, 593-7120, by Friday, April 28. Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 April 19, 2000 EPA and AMSA Achieve Important Victory in TMDL Litigation The federal district court for Northern California has ruled in favor of EPA and AMSA in defending the agency's authority to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waterbodies impaired solely by nonpoint sources. If upheld on appeal, it also confirms EPA's authority to develop TMDLs for waterbodies jointly impaired by point and nonpoint sources. Logging and farming interests, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, challenged EPA's development of load allocations for logging businesses along the Garcia River in Northern California. The primary pollutant causing impairment along the river is sediment. The load allocations were implemented through the California Department of Forestry and Agriculture. EPA had threatened to withhold grant funding to the State of California if it did not implement the TMDL loading numbers. The plaintiffs argued that EPA was indirectly implementing the loading numbers, and therefore it was regulating nonpoint sources beyond its authority. The court ruled that EPA has the authority to both develop the loading numbers and to withhold funding from the State it it doesn't implement the numbers. AMSA intervened in the lawsuit to protect point sources from bearing sole responsibility for cleaning-up impaired waters. Recent data suggest the nonpoint sources are solely or jointly responsible for most impaired waterbodies. Nonpoint sources have been seeking a federal legislative "fix"for the Clean Water Act to prevent further controls over nonpoint sources, and it appears likely that they will appeal this decision. The decision may be downloaded from the AMSA Internet site at www.amsa-cleanwater.org. Results of Utilities Audit In March 1999, the FAHR Committee and Board approved a professional services agreement with Makesense, Inc., for utility and telecommunications auditing services. This audit was designed to identify utility overcharges, resulting from both utility billing errors and less than ideal payment plans/structures for all District utilities. The study was conducted on a contingency fee basis with any payment to Makesense based solely on the discovery of the aforementioned billing errors. The District fared extremely well in this audit; only one very minor error was discovered resulting in a total payment to the auditing firth for$183.96. According to Roger Barlow, principal of Makesense, Inc., "Believe me, this has been the largest number of clean billings I have ever encountered. OCSD should be commended for its management of telecommunications and utility services and bills." Attached for your reference is a letter from Makesense, Inc. describing the audit results in more detail. Congratulations to District staff for a job well done. Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 April 19, 2000 Biosolids Update During the past month, the following biosolids-related developments have occurred throughout California: In Sacramento, Senate Bill 1956 has been amended to require the adoption of a statewide, science-based, uniform regulation for the land application of biosolids in California. The bill allows for local control over biosolids recycling when the local regulation is based on substantial, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence that shows that an unreasonable adverse effect would exist on the environment or public health within the local jurisdiction. The bill will be discussed at the Senate Environmental Quality Committee on April 24. A resolution supporting this bill has been prepared for the Board's April 26 meeting. Also in Sacramento, Blake Anderson has been invited to be a speaker for the Great Valley Center's annual regional conference, "Our Place in the World 3- Central Valley Mosaic"being held on May 10. Specifically, Blake will be a panelist discussing "Biosolids: Local Bane or Boon?" In El Centro, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors has adopted an ordinance that bans the use of all forms of biosolids, including Exceptional Quality biosolids compost. The first reading of the biosolids ordinance will occur on May 5, 2000. In Buttonwillow, a public meeting was held on April 5 to address local concerns over the proposed development of the Yakima Composting site. Approximately 40 people attended, including supervisorial candidate Cathy Palls and several members from the radio and television media. Strong local opposition to the Yakima Composting project exists within the community. Comments from the public included concerns over increased truck traffic, pathogen and heavy metal contamination, and the perception of Buttonwillow as being a dumping ground considering the existing Laidlaw and Safety Clean disposal sites. In Lancaster, Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich announced a "Sludge Summit"to be held on April 19. The summit will discuss the environmental and human impact of land application of biosolids in the Antelope Valley. Assemblyman George Runner, State Senator William Knight and Kern County Supervisor Steve Perez are expected to attend. Scientist with expertise in biosolids from the U.S. EPA, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the University of Arizona will provide testimony. In Bakersfield, KERN radio hosted two programs on the Kern County biosolids ordinance. In the first day's program, a staff member from the City of Los Angeles, an agency consultant and a biosolids opponent from the National Sludge Alliance in New York debated the "science"on both sides of the biosolids issue. The second Members of the Board of Directors Page 5 April 19,2000 day's program had counsel from the City of Los Angeles, Kern County and Grimmway Farms debated issues related to the lawsuit and Senate Bill 1956. Both programs were well balanced and the biosolids supporters did an excellent job. Audiotapes of the programs are available for review by contacting Mike Moore at 714 593-7450. Several biosolids related articles have appeared in local newspapers. Attached for your review are two articles that recently appeared in the Bakersfield Californian. Water Infrastructure Caucus Formed A bipartisan water infrastructure caucus has been formed by members of the US Congress to work to educate 'policy makers in Washington on the status and future of our nation's water systems." According to the EPA, there will be an estimated $20 billion annual funding gap for needed water infrastructure improvements over the next 20 years. The Water Infrastructure Network (WIN), a coalition of drinking water and wastewater associations; local elected officials; state government and environmental organizations; and associations representing engineers, contractors, fabricators, and water and wastewater equipment manufacturers, has released a WIN-produced report entitled "Clean Safe Water for the 21"Century. A Renewed National Commitment to Water and Wastewater Infrastructure. The report can be found at the following web address: www.amsa-cleanwater.org/advocacy/WiNreport.htm. Out of the Office I will be taking a two-week vacation, as mentioned in my farewell letter, beginning on April 29, prior to my retirement on May 13. During that time, Blake Anderson will be interim General Manager. If you would /like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donail McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt HAWP.OTAWMINN3 MLLETTER3 TO THE BOMMM426W,DX Attachments ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 19, 2000 tn.: 17141962-2411 Chair Jan Debay and nieiin °112 a, Be.BBtff7 Members of the Board B rountain valley ca Orange County Sanitation District 92728-8127 Post Office Box 8127 .tra.t.m,1.s: Fountain Valley, CA 92728 10Bg Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,cA 92708-0018 Dear Chair Debay and Members: As you know, my retirement date is to be effective May 13, 2000. However, as you may not know, my last day on the job will be April 28 since I will be taking the last two weeks as vacation. Ilgen.IM • As I leave the District I want to take this opportunity to thank you for the support and Cities the cooperation your have shown during my five-year tenure as your General anaZ Manager. Brea Buene rick During this period, I have learned a great deal about the specifics of wastewater press F^unwnl vale, management and believe I have provided the leadership to help move a very Fullerton professional and technically effective agency toward the goal of becoming a more Garder nan eava ch efficient) managed and disciplined organization. Hvnungmn Beach Y 9 P 9 Irvine La Habra As some of the Board members will recall, I arrived at a time when the agency had La Palma one through a difficult period, which was compounded b the County bankruptcy. Las aa,nlma 9 9 P P Y ty P cY Newv^rt Beach While the specific charge to me from the Board was to re-engineer the agency (i.e. °range change the corporate culture m first major effort was the unhappy task of ridding ale=env. 9 )� Y 1 PPY 9 Sanw A. the agency of drug and alcohol users and dealers, which proved to be a difficult and Seal Beach time-consumin task. And while successful in removing 33 employees and swell 9 9 r.un disciplining several others, this left a cloud over our efforts to convince employees of ✓a.Perk our intentions to effect lasting change through their cooperation. Y^rba Linea County of orange Nevertheless, we have persevered in our re-engineering efforts and have,through the District Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) initiatives, made some major Sanitary Districts strides in increasing efficiencies and reducing costs, particularly in operations and Geow Mesa maintenance. Mieway Dry water Districts While major staff reductions have been made (18%to date), more may be accomplished with the implementation of the J-42 project, the Plant lrv;ne Haath Reinvention/Automation Project. This is an estimated$25 million plant automation effort that will make it possible to reduce the need for the present level of operators, and will also reduce the amount of chemical and electrical energy required for normal operations. Between DART and J-42, there is potential for further staff reductions; however, the results of these programs will not be realized for another year or more. 'To Protect the Pvbhc Health and Me Environment through Excellence n Wastewater Systems- y q, Chair Debay and Members of the Board Page 2 April 19, 2000 Perhaps the most interesting work in the past five years has been the preparation of the Strategic Plan. This was designed to be a policy-driven plan in contrast to the 1989 Master Plan that was more brick and mortar-based. This planning exercise proved to be an important opportunity for the Board and staff alike to become more educated on the short- and long-range policy issues that guide the agency. As a result of the Strategic Plan study, several new initiatives have been started. Perhaps most important is the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS), a joint effort with the Orange County Water District to reclaim up to 100 mgd of wastewater for groundwater recharge. If ultimately approved by both boards, it would be the largest project of its type in the country and it would be a major statement about this area's intention to become more independent of outside water supplies. Ultimately, the GW RS would supply about 15%of the potable water needs of the Orange County Water District's service area and would essentially negate the District's need for a new or modified ocean outfall. The Strategic Plan also focused our attention on inflow and infiltration (1/1) problems that plague any system of this type. We Teamed that during storms the system's peaking factor increased from 1.7 in 1990 to 2.2 in 1998 and without mitigation of some sort this trend will continue. Since our member agencies maintain most of the collection system, it was important to gain their interest in helping to solve this problem. The Cooperative Projects program was established to encourage member agencies to more aggressively address 1/1 problems in their individual sewer systems. The goal by 2020 is a 40 mgd reduction (in rate of flow) during storm events. This was to be accomplished by matching grants for projects that would directly or indirectly reduce 1/1. A related aspect of the Cooperative Projects program is in the area of water conservation. Obviously, the less water used the less we have to treat. In 1998 a Water Efficiency Committee became active in assisting MWDOC in their conservation program by focusing on a toilet retrofit program. The goal of this program is a reduction in flow of 13 mgd by 2020. Very recently, this program has been given a boost by members of the OCW D Board, who have committed to a more aggressive program of conservation from that agency. Districts'consolidation has been an important improvement to the Board's governance process. In 1998. through special State legislation, the nine independent districts were combined into a single legal entity with the same representation for its member agencies but with only one rather than nine governing bodies. The second step in this process is to consolidate the rate structure, which is oq, Chair Debay and Members of the Board Page 3 April 19, 2000 now somewhat different for each of the revenue areas (formerly Districts). This step will simplify and streamline the accounting and financial processes and will essentially complete the process of moving the agency from an aggregation of separate governments to a single regional agency. A new issue on the horizon is urban runoff and the agency's appropriate role in this complex matter. The beach closure in Huntington Beach last summer has focused that city's leadership on how to prevent future episodes. The County has taken on this issue because of the Huntington Beach experience and because of the frequent beach closures in South County. Moreover, the matter has taken on statewide attention and there are at least two bills in Sacramento that would strengthen the regulators' hands in this matter. Although this agency's responsibilities remain unclear in the proposed legislation, what is clear is that there will be growing political pressure to divert dry season flow through our plants, just as we did last summer to assist Huntington Beach and the County during the beach closure. While this has never been part of the mission of this agency, it appears that it may soon become a new responsibility if, indeed, it is not already! The issue is not so much capacity if it is truly dry season flow; the issue will be whether it jeopardizes our NPDES permit and/or waiver. As I leave the agency, I have the satisfaction of knowing that the agency is in good hands. Under Blake's leadership it will be well managed and it will have the support of an interested and cooperative Board of Directors. Of the eight people in the top management team, three have long tenure with the agency and five have less than five years here, but have valuable and appropriate experience elsewhere. This provides a healthy balance of experience and expertise. It is a professional team that will move the agency forward. In closing, I again want to thank the members of the Board for their continued support and compliment them for the leadership they provide for the important work of this agency. Your continued leadership and vision will ensure that this agency continues to enjoy best in class standing in this industry. Sincerely, r!� Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt rr `C A L S T A T E ORANGE COUNTY FULLERTON BUSMESSCOUNCn. Centerfor Public Policy FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 22, 2000 For Further Information: Stan Oftelie, President & CEO, Orange County Business Council (949) 794-7213 Alan Saltzstein, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science and Coordinator, Masters of Public Administration Program, CSUF (714) 278-3771 Phillip Gianos, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science and Acting Chair, Political Science& Criminal Justice, CSUF (714) 278-4713 Keith Boyum, Ph.D., Acting Associate Vice President, Academic Programs and Professor of Political Science, CSUF (714) 278-4831 Richard Rocke, Ph.D., Acting Dean, Engineering & Computer Science, CSUF: Host for SRRS2 Conference (714) 278-3362 Ayman Mosallem, Ph.D., Adjunct Professor, Civil Engineering, CSUF: Chair of SRRS2 Conference (714) 278-2297 QUARTERLY PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY PROGRAM RESULTS RELEASED March 22, 2000 Infrastructure: Latest Survey Finds Orange County Voters Broadly Similar to National Survey Re- spondents on the Priority of Cleaning up Coastal Waters. However, Orange County Registered Voters Lag National Survey Respondents in Other Areas of Possible Tax-Supported Infrastructure Development. [Attachments: Survey Results and Analysis, SRRS2 Conference] Fullerton, CA - A survey released today finds that -- except for a willingness to see taxes and spending rise for cleaning up coastal waters -- Orange County registered voters are noticeably less willing than respondents to a January 1999 national survey to pay in- creased taxes for infrastructure improvements. The February-March telephone survey of Orange County registered voters was done for Cal State Fullerton's Center for Public Policy (CPP). The survey is the product of a continuing partnership with the Orange County Busi- ness Council, designed to build knowledge about local public policy issues. Page 1 of 8 `C A L S T A T E ORANGE COUNTY FULLERTON 'tam HUSINESSCOUNCII, Centerjor Public Policy In the latest results from the quarterly public opinion survey program, a remarkable 39% of Orange County registered voters said that the quality of life in their own neighbor- hood had either greatly improved or somewhat improved in the last four or five years. An- other 43% said that the quality of life had not changed in that time period. The Orange County survey respondents also named the quality of infrastructure as important to the overall quality of life: some 78% said that infrastructure quality was either"extremely" or "very' important, while only 21% said that it was only"somewhat" or"a little" important. The Center for Public Policy/OCBC—sponsored survey asked the same questions that were posed in a study based on the January 1999 survey, done for the Rebuild Amer- ica Coalition. (See the report at hftp://www.rebuildamerica.org/reports/survey.htmi ) The Orange County survey was done for the Center for Public Policy and the Busi- ness Council by Cal State Fullerton's Social Science Research Center. The Social Science Research Center surveys by telephone in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Director of the Social Science Research Center is Dr. Gregory Robinson. The results were released in conjunction with SRRS2, the second annual Conference on Seismic Repair& Rehabilitation of Structures, held March 21-22, 2000 at California State University, Fullerton. Further information about the conference, which features technical papers read by presenters from around the world, may be found at: http:/Avww.SRRS2.com Responding to the survey findings, CSUF Political Science Professor Phillip Gianos said that "translating a broad sense that the infrastructure needs improvement into specific, politically acceptable projects is an achievable but tough task. The airport/ Measure F saga teaches us that," said Gianos. Page 2 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY FULLERTON BUSNEss cooNCIL Cemerfor PuGlio Pofiry "The responses on coastal water quality also brings to mind what happened in Huntington Beach last year," continued Gianos. "We see that specific events can catalyze voters into thinking about infrastructure matters." "Orange County will grow by more than 20% -- more than half a million people -- be- tween now and 2020," said Stan Oftelie, President & CEO of the Orange County Business Council. "A key question for us is how to maintain our quality of life within the context of this projected growth. Understanding the voters' sentiments as we begin this debate will help us understand what county leadership must do." "The nation and certainly Orange County need much more attention, and much more spending, frankly, on public infrastructure if we are to keep up with population growth and spread," said Cal State Fullerton's Engineering and Computer Science Acting Dean Richard Rocke. 'We also urgently need to maintain our guard on seismic upgrades of infrastructure. Schools, hospitals, bridges, roads, and public and private buildings of all types, need to be maintained at high standards in this earthquake-prone area;' said Rocke. Alan Saltzstein, Professor of Political Science and Coordinator of the Masters of Pub- lic Administration program at CSUF commented that "the survey speaks well generally for public services, and indirectly for public employees in the County. It is particularly signifi- cant that much of the Orange County public perceives that community infrastructure has "stayed the same" or "gotten better" than do those in the national sample (76% to 72%). It is only recently that significant funds were made available for new streets and roads. Thus the positive response occurs in spite of a backlog of projects that are now under construc- tion." Page 3 of 8 FULLERTON N•�\J ORANGE COUNTY \ susnvssscouNcu Cenenfor Pubfio Polity "Forty eight percent also perceive that the quality of roads, highways and bridges as getting better, as opposed to 38% in the national sample," noted Saltzstein. Saltzstein continued, "The survey suggests that Orange County citizens support in- creased funding to clean up coastal waters and guarantee save and efficiently sewage and water systems. Strong majorities support a tax increase for both areas. "However, the support falls short of the needed 2/3 votes for tax increases, and of course, the voting public is different than those who are randomly contacted. Thus the cur- rent complexity of our taxing system may be getting in the way of public needs as articulated by the citizens." These data are from the second in a series of quarterly surveys to be undertaken jointly by Cal State Fullerton's Center for Public Policy and the Orange County Business Council on public policy issues impacting Orange County's economic and social life. # # # Attachments: Survey Results and Analysis SRRS2 Conference Sponsors Page 4 of 8 '�' `C A L S T A T E ORANGE COUNTY FULLERTON :° BUSINESS COUNCIL c�N�,�,r„anorwrry SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Percentage of Respondents "Very" or "Somewhat" Willing to Spend 1% More Per Year in Taxes for: Feb/Mar2000 Jan. 1999 Orange Counri Nat'l Survev Registered Voters Respondents Clean Up Coastal Waters *' 62 62 " National sample was asked, "Have fish return to most local waterways." Guarantee Safe & Efficient Sewage & Water Treatment System 58 74 Eliminate Most Road Congestion 53 62 Removing Litter and Graffiti from Roads and Bridges, and Keep it 50 56 Off Permanently Improve Public Transit Service Levels 44 56 Analysis Cleaning up the coast, for these Orange County registered voters, mattered the most. However, by a 16-point margin, Orange County registered voters were less interested than the national sample in spending tax money to guarantee sewage and water treatment sys- tems. By a nine point margin Orange County registered voters were less interested in doing away with road congestion, and by a twelve point margin, Orange County survey respon- dents trailed the national group in willingness to support public transit service. All of this arises in a context of substantial satisfaction with the way things presently are in Orange County—apart from coastal waters quality. Here are the relevant numbers, compared to the national survey released in January, 1999. Page 5 of 8 'C A L S T A T E �: ORANGE COUNTY E�&V� _ FULLERTON BUSIMSSCOUNcn. Cm,,fb,P it Policy Respondent Estimates of Quality of Infrastructure Feb/Mar 2000 Jan. 1999 Orange County Nat'l Survey Registered Voters Respondents Quality of Airport Service Gotten Better: 33 39 Stayed Same: 45 36 Gotten Worse: 11 11 Quality of Drinking Water Gotten Better: 9 13 Stayed Same: 58 57 Gotten Worse: 19 25 Water Quality of Rivers. Lakes, Coastal Gotten Better: 7 26 Stayed Same: 30 36 Gotten Worse: 47 30 Quality of Roads. Bridges, Highways Gotten Better: 48 38 Stayed Same: 21 31 Gotten Worse: 26 30 On the Whole. Community Infrastructure Gotten Better: 30 32 Stayed Same: 46 40 Gotten Worse: 18 24 Analysis Orange County registered voters seem at ease about airport service quality, and largely at ease about the quality of drinking water—though more see it worsening than get- ting better. Meanwhile, the quality of roads, bridges and highways is seen to be increasing, and the overall quality of Orange County infrastructure is largely seen as satisfying the sur- vey respondents. The standout appears to be on water quality, where the question read, "compared to five years ago, would you say that the water quality of rivers, lakes, and coastal waters near you has gotten better, worse, or stayed about the same?" Nearly half of Orange County survey respondents thought this aspect of their environment was worsening over recent years, and a remarkable 62%were willing to say they would support about 1% extra in taxes to tackle the problem. Orange County survey respondents differed in certain of their views about infra- structure as between northern and southern county communities. Excluding "don't know" from the analysis, some 60% of south Orange County respondents thought that the quality of roads, bridges and highways had improved over the last four or five years, but only 49% of north Orange County respondents took the same position. When it came to assessing the overall quality of the infrastructure in Orange County, survey respondents did not significantly differ by political party, political ideology, race/eth- Page 6 of 8 '1r.W C A L S T A T e ORANGE COUNTY WPM SHIFULLERTON '11&_ BUSINESS col IL CM,,for P.N,CPu@ry nicity, or home owner/ renter. Neither was income significantly associated with respon- dents' overall judgments about Orange County infrastructure quality. However, self-described liberals were much readier to pay more in taxes to eliminate road congestion than were self-described conservatives. Some 64% of liberals in our sur- vey were either very or somewhat willing to see their taxes raised to battle road congestion, while half of self-described conservatives were either somewhat or very unwilling to see their taxes rise for this purpose. Meanwhile, renters were much less inclined to support tax increases for better transit services than were home-owners. Some 57% of renters were either very or somewhat un- willing to pay about 1% more in taxes to see improvements in transit service. Yet home- owners registered at 58% in being either very or somewhat willing to pay for the hypothetical tax to support transit service. When it came to transit, Democrats and self-described liber- als supported the possibility of a tax increase to improve service, while Republicans and self-described conservatives opposed the idea. Democrats were similarly more likely than Republicans to support a possible 1% rise in taxes to support "safe and efficient" water and sewage systems. "We see some familiar patterns in these data, especially the data on taxes; said Dr. Keith Boyum, a political scientist holding the post of Acting Associate Vice President, Aca- demic Programs. "That Democrats and liberals might be somewhat more supportive of government programs such as infrastructure is certainly no surprise." "However," said Boyum, 'we may also see in the Orange County data some support for those who may wish to propose infrastructure improvements. Half of more of the county's registered voters profess to be at least somewhat willing to raise taxes to support needed projects." The survey reached by telephone a random sample of 511 registered voters in Orange County, during the period February 15—21, and March 1 — 19, 2000. The survey has an error rate of+/- 3.85%. Cal State Fullerton's Social Science Research Center conducted the interviews on behalf of the Center for Public Policy and the Orange County Business Council. The Director of the Social Science Research Center is Dr. Gregory Robinson. These results are from the second in a series of quarterly surveys undertaken jointly by Cal State Fullerton's Center for Public Policy and the Orange County Business Council on public policy issues impacting Orange County's economic and social life. Page 7 of 8 r `C A L S T A T E ORANGE COUNTY FULLERTON :'•� BUSINESSCOUNCIL Ce "jb'Public Polity SRRS2 CONFERENCE ON SEISMIC REPAIR & REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES 2 PURPOSES: Conference provides an opportunity for direct contacts between aca- demia, industry, state and federal organizations, creating awareness of new methods for repair and retrofit of structures. THEMES: • Design Aspects and Field Applications • Advanced Composites For The 3'" Millennium • Seismic Retrofit of Bridges • Composite Repair and Rehabilitation Systems for Reinforced • Concrete, Steel &Wood Structures • Durability& Long-Term Performance • Design Codes & Performance Standards KEY PERSONNEL: • Dr. Richard Rocks is Acting Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Sci- ence at Cal State Fullerton, and conference host. • Conference Chairman and organizer is Dr. Ayman Mosallam, of Cal State Fullerton. • Dr. Chandrasekhar Putcha, Cal State Fullerton Professor of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering, is Conference Co-Chairman. • James Roberts of the California Department of Transportation is the Honorary Conference Chairman. • Co-sponsors of SRRS2 include Cal State Fullerton CalTrans The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration The American Concrete Institute The American Society of Civil Engineers The City Engineers Association of Orange County The Earthquake Engineering Research Institute The International Conference of Building Officials The International Concrete Repair Institute The Mid-America Earthquake Center The South Coast Air Quality Management District The Southern Califomia Earthquake Center Page 8 of 8 - , u uE r-Wu $IWIKIIN CNiIYXm uwKF df NgQY enlla InNWMI nMou SOAP ALERT REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE March 17.2000 TO: SCAP Member Agouties& Interested Paves FROM: Raymond C. Killer,Executive Director U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE HEARING ON MARCH 22, 2000 "EPA'a SLUDGE RULE: CLOSED MINDS OR OPEN DEBATE?" Scheduled for earlier this mouth and then postponed, the hearing will take place before the House Committee oa Science in Washington A.C.on Wednesday,Mach 22,2000. '"This hearing will address whether FPA, in its development and enforcement of the Pan 503 Sludge Rule, is failing to foster sound science with an open exchange of ideas and information between scientists, FPA officials, and private citizens. The hearing will explore allegations that EPA scientists who disagree with EPA's science associated with the sludge Wile were ignored or, worse, subjected to harassment Even more disturbing are documented reports of intimidation directed at private citizens who express concerns about FPA sludge policies and the science behind those policies (quote from U.S. House of Representatives, Hearing Charter)." Full information on the hearing, a list of the Science Committee members and of those invited to mstify,etc.,may be found at the following Imemet address: www: house.gov.eo alscience; click on Hearings and Markups; scroll and click on FLU Committee Hearings; scroll to EPA's Sludge Pule: Closed Minds or Open Debate? -March 22, 2000, then click on Hearing Charter and Witness List. We encourage our member agencies to write letters supporting FPA's approach in the development of the Part 503 rules. To assist you in this endeavor, attached is a letter from OCSD and a draft of a letter from SCAP prepared by Biosolids Co-Chair, Amre Briggs. Please address your letter to your Califomia Congressman represented on the Science Committee (a list of these members is attached) with copies sent to other California Committee members...and we[hank yor foryour help! 3a295 ftwo Vern fluo.Sere 113 S4..1W a Capimam.CA92675 Fa. 954/999-0150 To 949499-7676 ^` " •• �•� P—NUP/RATIND C HILLER, PE 9494111101150 T-175 P.02/05 F-630 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Honorable Cana Rnoraoaeher united States House of Representatives Committee on Silence ma SSIN2411 2238 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-0545 ua®ng moos �;M SUBJECT: Hearing an'EPA's Sludge Rule. Closed Minds or Open Debate?' ex��-stx� awxaabcss: It is my understanding that the U.S. House of Representatives Comminee an Science m a will meet on Thursday. March 2,2000 to discuss'EPKs Sludge Rule" Closed Minds or Open Debate?- We also understand that this meeting is not intended to focus on the specific merits of the Pan 503 Rules- This rule was promulgated in 1993 after extensive research and scientific pear reviews by the foremost independem room researchers on the environment, agriculture,and public health. Thousands of pages of ,gmda. comments were addressed and responded to during the rule-making process ci. In my opinion the best available scientific information was incorporated into these standards. While scientific opinion encompasses a broad range of viewpoints, EPA received and addressed all aspects of those viewpoints. Since the promulgation of the awa Pr. Rule,some Individuals have expressed concerns about the scientific validity of the eon� standards. Most of those concerns have been addressed by the peer review Aarrmn committee and have been thoroughly and openly discussed_ C8'aeo Eae The implications of a firming by the comrnlhee that casts doubt on this rule-making �+ process could be devastating to public confidence in biosofids management programs conducted by thousands of municipal facilities mat treat wastewater throughout the Ne+w B= country. D-ango s w ar�ie While there is always room for improvement in terms of additional information sow aY gathering and operational practices,it makes no sense to abandon a regutadon that rests on firm scientific and process grounds. I believe my comments reflect the vast majority of opinion of those involved in the management of biosolids. 1 urge you to base your conclusions on the overwhelming facts and not on rhetoric and innuendoes. mavq m C.wpo Should you have any questions please feel free to call me at(774)593-7110. taivrt daaias _ � womP o"`"`s �-Blake P.Anderson rws na.ro, - Assistant General Manager BPAIMDM'mcm K� DTAtTS alddlsJFTTE=S REPS doc TO P2((LTme ouRVC HYIN Ella TP 6mvMI.YY1[]YGlpf11'6HY(ICB M WYyyfP]PV!/,�5" - ••• • ..era ua r oau DRAFT The Honorable F. James Scasenbrenner Jr. Chair,House Science Committee 2320 RHOB Washington,DC 203515 The Honorable Ken Calvert 2201 RHOS Untied States House of Representatives Washington,DS 20515 Dear W. Chaff tman: Dear Representative Calvert: The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works(SCAP)is a coalition of fifty four(54)sanitarian agencies in Southern California whose mission is improve the overall effectiveness of euvi onnremal programs and ensure that regulations affecW publicly owned treatment works are reasonable and in the public's best interest. SCAP supports the beneficial use of biosolids for agricultural reclamation purposes. SCAP takes great interest in the U.S.House Science Commince's Hearing eatided"EPA's Sludge Rule: Closed Minds or Open Debate?". We are particularly concerned about the overall tone of the bearing. The tone of this hearing is such that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA)support of land application of biosmlids is viewed as the"cheapest disposal" alternative rather than support of the recycling of a product that benefits the environment. Thete is implication dwt the USEPA supports the land application of biosolids as a last resort because it has been banned for ocean disposal. Further,it is implied that the US EPA's regulations did not receive widespread academic and scientific peer review,as well as formal public notification. It is on behalf of 54 public agencies serving all of Soudern California that we request that you consider the unheard voice in the hearing-that of public agenics supporting proper use of a valuable product for beneficial purposes including agriculture and restoration of environmentally damaged land SCAP strongly believes that sound-science exists to support the proper use of hiosolids to benefit the environment and not compromise public health. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. SH d Ell/J. saJnSnl>tf3 2lt 113NN31if3N35N35 I 3 '>tfutWR asp of uol*dnwed ina a P1p+ug -loot t mwbm mm aiepowumme m=mu=mpe WMI rl spaau oaoufnuoO MU 'IM-smZ-ME 14(1138 lamp"»eium asgld 'sanmgedsa a!paw!rymu malt tle Jo XW a:ryun a anvP IRIA pPwuS utm ryl m aO!I!rysdtr�aq1 an uowlpxap a$edwti,f a pug assa(d paf(aaoy suoMW*=d efpzwopun,(o ague:Penal it amt.mg of AlgezW Suw papaMn uaaq"4(at EL)moos Snupy aafnunuo,am-L S ap•Rllauumppv -5856 RZ•-M m aaUwmRO MUMS 4+P30 l WwJ 14g!sWAO VVS nalnm asaald'=uac S uo aaflf ntulrj aryl ampq mmamadde mob Su!ufaaum suou=b Sue aeay flog 11 slaoflnlnnbal asagf;o uopu!mv aged atw papvoa aryl*Auto pue.tlosola Pea+astald 6u=om Seau1!�a SnnfeaS safnpaaufd antasgo lshw aauaag ua aaflnuufb,aqf alopq Supc}!ssal sassaof!M 'P�Ru!1�4 lebg�rp om.Palnsof aq n!n..gfamnrn uaourn moA •R1ww?aal mat;o ub!lnuwu pug u}masvd a S=nWm any anau(t!&=A �n a"S E05 2+P30 umleSpnuofd aryl pUn aanans you* ma-w an Vm aauooadm m"azunnums ppufrys Sunw!7sa1 mot •spilm"uo.u"Idde poet ]a saaauf aryl lnoge suabanb 9nmlu spgamapi m aoaoeu sn on 3aa!4ns aql uo an+oas!p agpo a asauuado S,Vd3 SS71PPa IVm pml mry-alnf UD5 ag13a"w*gmds m uo s1n1g fou titm ku=4 n4L vooq!w!,�fanal plrolgo mn6 sa sanfa saffal vu 'JPl.mo my=MfWH unqKra-pp and wov11+R•yu'e mot 'OWE i uasepu uo imu4ap WdO m'�7fY�+*8J:� {Y�Pap!Pti Suueaq mo ne�gsal a nu+t ofuu!aoffuwuo,aaoa��S'41 %utm-wl-So aeap oa000'n'�m!�u 13"m ooPw7u5 tpmm 10(o M3 6ptr avMS Sum r"1 Lm9"sO rr aw ttl9.91z talc rw.r,.��w� +wns+w lnn?if5lL7uf101'lfaHSYM �yvr�s..o'e �`s n�a�r gletfanf137FW 3SfIQllntlAgAYd NT2311ffY �dt.. 33N31O8NO33LUWWO3 —w> + nuvw r-OiU CALIFORNIA REPRESENTATIVES ON THE HOUSE SCIENCE COMMITTEE Honorable Dana Rhombacher United States House of Representatives Committee on Science M8 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0545 Honorable Joe Baca United States House of Representatives Committee on Science 2300 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0542 Honorable Ken Calvert United States House of Representatives Commuee on Science 2201 Rayburn House Office Building Wasbington DC 20515-0543 Honorable Cary S. Miller United States House of Represcamrives Committee on Science 1037 Longworth House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0541 Honorable Steven T. Kuuykendall United States House of Representatives Committee oa Science 512 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0536 Honorable Lynn C. Woolsey United States House of Representatives 439 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0506 Honorable Zoe Lofgren United States House of Representatives 378 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0516 r� MAKESENSE Utility Bill Auditors ` 395 Rolling Hills Drive,Conroe,Texas 77304 phone: 409.856.2405 • fax 409.858.5199 internet: htplNnvw.makesen inc.00m • 03/31/2000 Greg Mathews Assistant to the General Manager Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Greg, There were only a few possibilities for savings and I found no refunds. it is very unusual for us to find someone not being taken advantage of by at least one of the normal utilities. I've heard California had really cracked down on error causing billing practices. I've listed below the services audited to the extent feasible. I had hoped to work with AT&T on your wireless phones, but since AT&T was not Cooperating with me and since Bill was already evaluating those accounts,there's no sense in duplicating efforts. Bill and I spoke and he was in a better position to aim the cellular costs to management's target than I could ever be. I will not invoice for any cost reductions Bill may achieve, in spite of our contract. As for the pagers, someone "in the know" needs to call each one and evaluate the responses. It may take several attempts to eliminate those that are not being used, without cf�sconnecting someone. Since OCSD will have to supply the laborto work this out, I will not invoice for any cost reduction realized from disconnecting pagers. Regarding the land-lines, all proved to be in use and properly billed. There are several GTE circuits that do not match service addresses, but they are terminated for OCSD's convenience at properfies other than OCSD. Regarding Southern California Edison accounts, there were several that appeared to be bogus. SCE advised the accounts I questioned were phantom account numbers,differing only in the last 2 digits. Of all those suspect, only the Racquet Hill pump station (AM 70-29-133-4460-01) appears to have been used until January '99, at which time the next billing dropped to the basic minimum charge. Since OCSD did not request account dosure In writing or can otherwise substantiate communication to SCE of the desire for closure, some minimum monthly charge refunds are not due. Closing the account saves$15.33 per month or$183.96 per year. As of 03/02/00 thLs account was still open. Believe me,this has been the largest number of dean billings I have ever encountered. OCSD should be commended for its management of telecommunications and utility services and bills. Thank you for the opportunity to audit your bills and best of luck keeping them so"dean". B ardds, R rBadow End: Invoice BOARD OF SUPERVISORS D1ra15a Pwtaett SUPERVISORS a QMLK 0r BO RI)OF SUPEKVWM )on McQubmn._..,.___.Dinsict l Kern County Administrative Center Steve A. P<ra....__.._.,..District 2 Ills Truxtun Avcnue,Sth Hoot Barbara Patrick......_.__.District 3 tic Bakersfield,California 93301 Keaneda W. Pearson__.District 4 Telephone 661-968-3585 Pere H.Pam.___._.__..District 5 TIY Relay 800-735.2929 April 12,2000 The Honorable Byron D. Sher,Chairman Senate Committee on Environmental Quality State Capitol,Room 2203 Sacramento,CP.95814 RE: Opposition to SB 1956(Polaaco) Dear Mr. Chairman: The Kenn County Board of Supervisors opposes SB 1956(Polanco),which would effectively prohibit local jurisdictions from adopting or enforcing sewage sludge ordinances that are stronger than the State or federal standard In our view,neither the federal Part503 Sludge Rule nor the State sludge regulations now under dcvelop rent by the State Water Resources Control Board, which ere based on the federal rule, adequately ensure the health, safety, and welfare of Kcra County citizens. The Inspector General of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently raised serious questions about whether the EPA can effectively enforce compliance with its sludge rule. In addition,House Science Committee bearings have questioned whether the EPA encouraged the open exchange of scientific information and worse,whether dissenters within the agency on this issue were ignored or harassed. Supporters of SB 1956 cite the need ro recycle sludge as sufficient justification alone for overriding local land use decisions,but the fact mmains that sludge is a pollutant under the federal Clean Water Ace Sludge can contain PCBs,dioxins,furans,carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons,toxic metals,asbestos, bacteria,parasitic protozoa and worms,and fungi.These substances are subject to stringent regulation when they occur in air emissions and in water,yet sludge generators are spreadingunteated sludge on land in Kenn, County and elsewhere without reviewing the possible adverse impacts on human health,soil,and water. Such review is required under the rah mia Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Given theserious questions thatterrain about the(mown andtmknownrisks oflandspreading sewagesludge. the Kern County Board of Supervisors recently acted to place reasonable environmental restrictions on this practice in Kem County. The County's ordinance sets minimum depth to water tables beneath sludge spreading operations and requires that agronomic spreading rates be followed. By January 1. 2003, the ordinance allows only Class A."exceptimal quality"sludge that has been heated to remove most remaining pathogens to be spread in Kern County. Thus,the County's sludge ordinance promotes wise and sensible use of treated sludge as a fertilizer while prohibiting the application of excess sludge and phasing out the use of hmmeamd sludge. Our ordinance is being challenged in court by the City of Los Angeles and by sanitation districts in Orange and Los Angeles counties. At the same time, these agencies are sponsoring SB 1956 in an effort in effectively invalidate Kern County's ordinance.In our view,local citizens should retain control over sludge spreading. Local government is positioned and equipped through a conditional use permit(CUP)process to take local conditions into account in deciding if,where,and how sludge should be applied to land. When the EPA issued its sludge rule.the agency stated clearly that it expected many localjurisdictions to add their own restrictions.Furthermore,the CalifomiaHealth and Safety code requires county government to take any action necessary to preserve and protect the health,safety,and welfare of local inhabitants. Local jurisdictions should not be required by the State to shoulder any public health liability that a neighboringjerisdiction may wish to shovel onto them The people of Kem County deserve every protection against unsafe contactwidt paEhogens and othersludge-bome conmrainanm.OurBoardalsodesires to protect valuable agricultural lands which provide an abundant supply of food for Californians and for consumers throughout the nation and the world. For drese reasons,the County of Kern opposes the prohibitions in SB 1956 against local control of sludge spreading. Moreover, if sludge recycling is a matter of statewide concern as stared in SB 1956,then the bill should require sludge generators to comply with CEQA by serving as lead agencies in performing site- specific environmental review for sludge land application projects. Also,generators and their contractors for hauling and land application of sludge should be required to obtain a CUP from a local government for landapplicatienofsludge within thatjurisdicdon's boundaries.Finally,local governmentmnstbe authorized by the bill to collect reasonable and necessary fees from CUP applicants to cover the cost of regulatory activities and the costs of other impacts of sludge spreading on local government. To protect the health of our local citizens and preserve local control over land use decisions,the County of Kent asks the members of the Senate Committee on Environmental Quality not to approve this legislation in its current form Sincerely, Kenneth W.Peterson,Chairman Ken County Board of Supervisors I KP:ADKii:kmteribiosolidsltb1956sh.er cc: Environmental Health Services Planning Resource Management Agency Kern County Farm Bureau Richard Ritts I y vul FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION KERN COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 1115 TRUXTUN AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 (805) 868-3155 fax (805) 868-3190 TO: Bob Garda DATE: April 12,2000 (916) 443-7633 FROM: Allan Kraute Legislative Analyst SUBJECT: SB 1956 ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL Attached is a copy of the County's alternative proposal for SB 1956 together with a copy of a letter from our Board of Supervisors to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environmental Quality. Essentially,it is our view that sludge poses sufficient risks to health,water,and soil so as to warrant regulation under the CEQA process as well as locally imposed conditions governing its land application and the collection of local fees to offset the cost of this regulatory oversight. Sludge contains many substances that are heavily regulated when they occur in air emissions and in water;yet sludge generators and their contractors are spreading unknown quantities of sludge with unknown content on unlmown areas of land. CEQA now requires sludge generators to study and inform the public regarding possible adverse impacts of their projects before carrying them out. We propose that generators be required by law to comply with CEQA by serving as lead agencies responsible for conducting thorough site-specific environmental review for sludge land application;that generators,contractors and haulers of sludge be required by law to obtain conditional use permits under CEQA for land application within local jurisdictions;and that the collection of reasonable and necessary local fees to cover regulatory costs and local impacts of sludge land application be authorized by law. The County of Kern believes that SB 1956 must include the above changes in order to fully protect the health and safety of local citizens. o.min 10002 . I • I Alternative to SS 1956 Whereas: 1. Sewage sludge is a "pollutant" under the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1362(6)) and its land application carries known and unknown risks to health, sail, and water. 2. The ocean disposal of sewage sludge was banned under the Clean Water Act as of January 1, 1992, due to the destruction inflicted by sludge on the marine ecology. In 1993 the EPA adopted regulations, known as Part 503, allowing the application of sewage sludge to agricultural land. 3. The EPA Inspector General has concluded, in a March 20, 2000, audit entitled "Biosolids Management and Enforcement," that the "EPA does not have an effective program for ensuring compliance with the land application requirements of Part 503" and "cannot assure the public that current land application practices are protective of human health and the environment' 4. The United States Congressional House Science Committee has convened hearings the purpose of which is to "address whether the EPA, in its development and enforcement of the Part 503 Sludge Rule, is failing to foster sound science with an open exchange of ideas and information between scientists, EPA officials, and private citizens" and to explore whether EPA scientists who have questioned the adequacy of the science and standards of the Sludge Rule have been ignored, or worse, harassed. 5. In a study conducted at the suggestion of the EPA, the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences concluded that reduction of the short-term threats to the environment from sludge land application depend entirely on proper agronomic management based on site-specific soil and climatic conditions, that local government officials should have early involvement in the land application of sludge and that additional study of the long-term impacts of land application is needed. 6. Sewage sludge contains pollutants such as PCBs,dioxins,furans,carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons,heavy toxic metals(arsenic,mercury, lead,selenium, cadmium, chromium, etc.), asbestos, bacteria (salmonella, staphylococcus, E. Coll and tuberculosis,etc.),viruses(Hepat tusA,etc.),parasitic protozoa(cyclosporacayetanensis) and worms, and fungi. 503 is extremely controversial in that it allows land application of these pollutants to agricultural land at levels that have been generally regarded and regulated as destructive of human health and the environment wherever they occur. Arsenic and chromium for example,which are carcinogens, may be land applied in sludge as a soil amendment at levels that would not be allowed in a surface landfill site regulated by 503. 7. The EPA acknowledges that 503 establishes only minimum standards for sludge land application, that 503 does 'not regulate all pollutants in sewage sludge that may be present in concentrations that adversely affect public health and the environment'and that "intense public scrutiny" of the site selection for sludge application is needed. 8. The economics of sewage sludge use and disposal provide no incentive for proper land application practices in that there is little or no demand by farmers for use of bulk sewage sludge as a soil amendment. The land application of sewage sludge is driven by the need of sludge generators to dispose of sewage sludge, and by the business interests of haulers and appliers who are paid by the sludge generators to haul and land apply sewage sludge. Consequently, the owners of the land upon which sewage sludge is applied are frequently the sludge generators themselves or private entities whose primary business is the hauling and land application of sludge, rather than farmers with a primary interest In proper use of sewage sludge for their farming operations. 9. Federal and state law provide that sewage sludge use and disposal is a matter of local determination and expressly authorize local government to provide more stringent regulation of the land application of sewage sludge than is contained in federal or state law. 10. Neither the EPA nor the State Regional Water Quality Control Boards have an effective program or mechanism for management, monitoring or control of sewage sludge land application practices. 11. SB 1956 directly conflicts with the letter and purpose of the California Environmental Quality Act(CECA),which requires that the generators of sludge study and inform the public concerning the possible adverse environmental impacts of their projects for sludge land application, before carrying out those projects. 12. The State Legislature statutorily requires county government to take any action necessary to preserve and protect the health, safety and welfare of local inhabitants (California Health and Safety Code § 101025). 13. Local government is the only government positioned and equipped, through a conditional use permit (CUP) process, to ensure, based on local conditions such as soil, water, climate and air and local growth management considerations, that sludge land application practices are not destructive of the health, safety and welfare of local inhabitants. State Legislation should provide: 1. That sludge generators must comply with CEQA by serving as lead agencies for the performance of site-specific environmental review for their projects for sludge land application, so as to take into account and study possible adverse impacts on local soil, water and air conditions and local growth management considerations, such as school siting and traffic, etc., and so as to fully inform the public concerning those local, site- specific impacts; 2. As a means of ensuring compliance with CEQA and that local environmental conditions are evaluated and studied before land application of sludge commences, local government would be specifically authorized to require that sludge generators and their contractors for hauling and land application of sludge obtain a CUP forthe land application of sludge on sites within the boundaries of the local government. Through the CUP 'I process, local government would be authorized, as a responsible agency under CEQA,to exercise reasonable discretion to attach,monitor and enforce conditions and requirements for sludge land application which are equal to or more stringent than the minimum requirements contained in 503 or state law. 3. Local governments should be authorized by the legislation to collect reasonable I and necessary fees from CUP applicants for sludge spreading activities in order to cover the cost of regulatory oversight and the cost of other impacts to local government from land application of sludge. BCB:dt #47a55v2 Local farmers field legal help in Kern's biosolids fight Page I of 3 ' e Nin r some extra cash? local news 1Wrr#MkrrAdbUitonn= Local farmers field legal help in Kern's biosolids fight Filed: 0313112000 By CHRISTINE BEDELL Californian staff writer e-mail: cbedell C bakersfield David is getting help slaying Goliath in the legal war that's broken out between Kern County and several Southern California waste agencies over biosolids. Attorneys for a large group of prominent local farmers filed court papers Friday seeking to help Kern County defend its right to regulate sludge spreading here. They're offering legal and technical expertise Kern County might need tc fight the lawsuit of six public and private agencies seeking to set aside its impending Class B biosolids ban. "(The sludge generators) are well-aligned and bring a lot to bear on Kern County," said Bob Joyce,the farmers' attorney. "Maybe we can level the playing field a bit." "Bring 'em on," Los Angeles Assistant City Attorney Christopher Westhoff said in response. "What they're trying to do is crowd the playing field, but that's not going to throw us." The farming companies that have joined the defense are among Kern County's best known: Grimmway Enterprises Inc.;A. Caratan & Son; D.M. Camp& Sons; Giumarra Vineyards Corp.; Jasmine Vineyards Inc.; M. Caratan Inc.; Pandol & Sons Farming Co.; Sun World Inc.; and Marko Zaninovich. Their attorneys argue that waste generators and handlers violated due- process rules under state and federal constitutions and state environmental law when they began trucking sludge to Kern County without first notifying or seeking input from Kern citizens. http://www.bakersfield.com/bakti--i 257581643.asp 04/12/2000 Local farmers field legal help in Kern's biosolids fight Page 2 of 3 The arguments are similar to those the Kern County Counsel's Office has asserted in response to the sludge generators' November lawsuit,as well as a cross-complaint Kern recently filed. Kern County Counsel Bernard Barman gave the farmers his blessing to attempt to join the suit, which is being handled in Tulare County Superior Court to help ensure a fair outcome. Barman said Friday that local water-district officials are pondering a similar move of symbolic and technical support. Currently, Barman said, Kern's legal resources in this case include its in-house staff and one outside environmental attorney. "We're very pleased to have help ... protecting the water and the soil of this county," Barman said. Biosolids,or sludge, are a mix of human and industrial waste used as fertilizer on nonedible crops. Concerned the material is polluting or could pollute local groundwater and soil,the Kern County Board of Supervisors in October approved a three-year phaseout of the land application of all but highly treated "exceptional quality" biosolids. One month later, sanitation districts in Los Angeles and Orange counties,as well as private biosolids handlers,filed suit, contending Kern should have completed an environmental impact report before approving the ordinance. The ban, they said,would result in a loss of farmland enriched by biosolids and that other means of sludge disposal would be more harmful to the environment. "The ordinance was adopted in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act,"Thomas Nixon, attorney for the Orange County Sanitation District, said again Friday. Another argument was that Class B biosolids are safe and that the federal Environmental Protection Agency adequately regulates their use under what's referred to as 503 regulations. Joyce,countering the notion sludge use is safe,noted congressional hearings held last week on an inspector general's report critical of EPA and its biosolids regulations. That audit,among other things, said: "EPA cannot assure the public that current land application practices are protective of human health and the http://www.bakersfield.comtbak/i--1257581643.asp 04/12/2000 Local farmers field legal help in Kem's biosolids fight Page 3 of 3 environment." "This screams loud and clear... as to why we need an ordinance and the right to control locally what happens in Kern County," Joyce said. Westhoff, on the other hand, said the inspector general's report hasn't changed his mind about the safety of land-applied biosolids. "I'm totally comfortable with the process the EPA went through to develop the 503 regulations and I'm comfortable with the product they came up with," he said. "As I think I told you before, I spread this stuff on my lawn." Staff writer James Burger contributed to this report. ® ® O beak b¢kaobp bonne CopyrlghtO 21M.The Sakersaeld Celltomian 1 Email the Webmaster Al acalated Emma Coovdght 4090A I Privacy Pelm Statement http://www.bakersfield.com/bak/i--1257581643.asp 04/12/2000 Sludge battle pits Kern County against powerful opponents Page I of 3 do you kno}jj ¢e t Bakeers iefd 20�00 .. the s wilth the rest ,0° Robert Price Search Sludge battle pits Kern County against i F— powerful opponents News Links Filed: 03/ISR000 AP ire BusinesInes The Bakersfield Californian s California& Bevond Election 2000 3/18100 Features Herb Benham In this corner, the office of Kern County y counsel, with its 23 Lottery Results staff attorneys,40 support employees and a budget of less than Milestones $4 million. Newcomer's GuidObituade OilIndust ry In this comer, the Los Angeles city attomy's office, with its 44` Opinion staff attorneys, 423 support employees and a $67 million budget. Parentwise Snarling from the same corner: the legal-department resources Read For Life of five other Southern California groups.They're all trying to gel Robert B beet Price a judge to throw out a Kern County ordinance,effective in 2003, Special reports that limits the type of processed human waste the county will School allow sludge-spreaders to spread on Kern County land. Sla= Weather If courtroom battles were decided on the same basis as shooting Entertainment wars—vastly superior amounts of money and people tend to Around town today mean the difference—the great Kern County Sludge War ODi In9 would be a rout. Movies On Stan Fortunately, the respective sides still need to convince a judge. TV Listings And in this respect Kern County still has the backing of law and Press Pass logic. Services Attorneys for the Sludge Six—the city of Los Angeles; County Find a iob Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County; Orange County Real Estate Source Sanitation District; California Association of Sanitation Autoassiffirm Cl ed Agencies; Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Kern Yellow Pages Treatment Works; and Responsible Biosolids Management Inc., Community a hauler of sludge—made that obvious enough when they sued Soeakout Kern County under the state environmental protection law bakersfield.orp known as CEQA. The side whose actions would affect, and potentially detract, from the environment—in this case,L.A. and its allies—is the side that normally would be considered http://www.bakersfield.conVprc/i--1258712606.asp 04/12/2000 Sludge battle pits Kern County against powerful opponents Page 2 of 3 responsible for proving those actions safe. L.A. has turned that upside down in an attempt to put the onus on Kern County.Try to follow this logic as I recap: Los Arrogance,et a1, is using an environmental protection statute, the California Environmental Quality Act, to attack an ordinance enacted to protect the environment. A talented lawyer,and L.A. presumably has many, can spin anything in any direction he or she wants, so it is comforting to hear James Thebeau, Kern County's deputy county counsel, point out that the federal Clean Water Act specifies that local governments are the final authority on the use and disposal of sewage sludge within their own boundaries. Which brings us to the next ring in this circus: the Legislature. Assemblyman Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield) is Floating a bill, AB 2495, that would close a possible loophole in the law by specifying that city and county governments, and not just government agencies, must abide by the local ordinances and zoning laws of neighboring cities and counties. State Sen. Richard Polanco(D-Los Angeles) appears to be moving in the opposite direction with SB 1956, which would promote "cooperation among local governments" on "the recycling of biosolids inherently involving the interaction of urban and rural areas." Polanco's most recent draft of the bill calls decisions on biosolids management "matters of statewide concern," which some in the Kern County camp believe might pave the way for a rewrite that specifically takes sludge- spreading permits out of the hands of local governments—or, worse,exempt cities and counties altogether from the ordinances and zoning practices of neighboring jurisdictions. With all this grappling for strategic advantage in the courts and state legislatures, the only branch of government yet to square off publicly is the executive. Anybody for a wrestling match between Richard Riordan and Ken Peterson? Sports fans might be under the impression that the primary regional rivalry in California is north vs. south. Fans of the Giants drink chardonnay and bring sweaters to the game, fans of the Dodgers beat the traffic by leaving in the sixth inning,and they make fun of each other because of it. But decades of wrangling over water, waste and regional autonomy have proven time and again that the deepest-seated rivalries in the state are not north vs. south but west vs. east, coastal vs. inland, urban vs. rural. This is just one more example. http://www.bakersfield.con✓prc/i--I258712606.asp 04/12/2000 Sludge battle pits Kern County against powerful opponents Page 3 of 3 • File this under Useless: If you're fascinated by that list of similarities between the Kennedy and Lincoln assassinations, or the stock market prediction system that's based on the outcome of the Super Bowl,you'll want to make a note of this. Five straight former or current vice presidents, running as the presidential nominees of their respective parties,have been defeated at eight-year intervals over the past 40 years: Richard Nixon, vice president under Dwight Eisenhower,lost to John F. Kennedy in 1960; Hubert H. Humphrey, vice president under Lyndon Johnson, lost to Nixon in 1968; Gerald Ford, vice president under Nixon,lost to Jimmy Carter in 1976;Walter Mondale, vice president under Carter, lost to Ronald Reagan in 1984;and George Bush,vice president under Reagan, lost to Bill Clinton in 1992. The superstitious forecaster would point to this trend and predict that Al Gore,vice president under Clinton, will lose to George W.Bush in November 2000. In case you're wondering, I have nt idea where Dan Quayle fits in all this. Copydghl®2DDO.The 9allemAeld Calilendan I Email the webmacler Associalad Press Cooydghl Mce I Pdvaev Policy Slelemenl httpJ/www.bakersfield.com/prc/i—W8712606.asp 04/12/2000 4"Oso STq)s o� Office of Inspector General Audit Report WATER Biosolids Management and Enforcement 2000-P-10 March 20,2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Domestic sewage sludge is the solid, semi-solid, or liquid by-product generated during the treatment of wastewater at municipal wastewater treatment plants. These sewage treatment plants are referred to as "publicly owned treatment works,"or POTWs. Domestic septage is the liquid or solid material removed from a septic tank, cesspool, portable toilet, type III marine sanitation device, or similar treatment works that receives only domestic septage. Sewage sludge includes domestic septage. The term "biosolids" refers to sewage sludge that has been treated and can be beneficially recycled. EPA encourages land application of biosollds rather than landfllling or incineration, and if applied properly, biosolids help condition soil and provide a beneficial use of waste. Land application means spraying or spreading the material on the surface of the land, injecting it below the surface, or incorporating it into the soil. Section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act required EPA to establish regulations for the use and disposal of sewage sludge. EPA issued the final rule, 40 CFR Part 503, Standards For The Use Or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, on February 19, 1993. The biosolids program is delegated to Texas, Oklahoma and Utah. In all other states, EPA is responsible for biosolids oversight. OBJECTIVES We conducted this review in response to an Office of Water(OW) request for an audit. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether(1) EPA oversight of biosollds land application can be more effective, and (2) the Government Performance and Results Act goal for biosolids is appropriate and readily reportable. In this audit we did not review the science and risk assessments related to Part 503. Report No.1000-P-10 RESULTS IN BRIEF EPA does not have an effective program for ensuring compliance with the land application requirements of Part 503. Accordingly,while EPA promotes land application, EPA cannot assure the public that current land application practices are protective of human health and the environment. Under Part 503, about 3,700 of the nation's 16,000 POTWs must annually report to EPA regions: information describing the concentration of pollutants, the presence of pathogens (e.g., bacteria, viruses, parasites), and the sludge's attractiveness to vectors (e.g., rodents, flies, mosquitoes) that could transmit pathogenic organisms to humans. In FY1998, EPA reviewed only about 38% of the Part 503 reports submitted by POTWs. EPA performs few biosolids related inspections of POTW operations, virtually no inspections of land application sites, and few records inspections at POTWs or land appliers. EPA regions do not maintain data on the cumulative amounts of pollutants at land application sites, even though Part 503 requires maintaining this data. There is no regional oversight of septage land application. The biosolids program has been delegated to only three states, and there is virtually no federal oversight of state biosolids programs in nondelegated states. Therefore, EPA does not have sufficient Information to determine compliance levels with the Part 503 regulatory requirements. This almost complete absence of a federal presence in the biosolids program results from the low priority given to biosolids management by EPA's Office of Water (OW), and the decision of EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) not to commit enforcement resources to biosolids. This may result in increased risks to the environment and human health, and cause a loss of public confidence in the biosolids program. EPA is required by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) to set long-term and annual goals, and to measure the results of its programs in annual reports to Congress. EPA 11 Report No.1000-P40 established a FY1999 annual performance goal that 50% of biosolids be beneficially reused. However, OW's Clean Water Action Plan does not reflect the priority to be given to biosolids land application even though OW has established a GPRA land application goal. EPA established this goal without defining "beneficial reuse." The goal also does not measure reductions in point source pollution,the subobjective under which the goal was established. Further, the goal was established without identifying the resources needed to achieve the goal, without clear guidance to the regions on what data to gather, and without describing verification and validation procedures. Consequently, EPA regions are measuring progress in different ways. Totaling these inconsistent measurements does not provide a meaningful picture of the national state of biosolids use and disposal practices, and is not a useful decision making tool for the biosolids program. FINAL REPORT Although we believe our draft report RECOMMENDATION recommendations best address the concerns raised in this report, recognizing the realities of competing priorities and limited resources, we provide revised recommendations for Chapter 2 of this report. These recommendations are preliminary steps which will improve the biosolids program. We recommend that the Assistant Administrators for OW and OECA provide, by the end of fiscal 2001, an analysis of whether the Agency's proposed actions provide a sufficient basis for assessing compliance with Part 503 and assuring the public of the protectiveness of land application practices. Our suggested scope for this analysis, when completed, will provide a basis for determining additional steps that might be required to ensure that management of blosolids is protective of human health and the environment. We may conduct a follow-up review of biosolids land application practices which would focus on the effectiveness of the Agency's actions and the quality of its analysis. iv Report No.2000-P-10 BUSINESS quito missile,that were previously for - —"_- Reviving Russia's military indus- the use of its own armed forces only. tries would require huge political This worries Russian military plan- determination. Even with the latest ners,especially as they fear China's a boost,Russia's procurement budget is supposed long-term designs on Rus- only aboutq%ofAmerim's.Oneof(he sia's thinly populated and mineral- country's best-known military fac- rich fart m asteregions t tories, Arsenal in St Petersburg, Indeed,the next time Russia raids 5 y =;mac foundedbyPetertheGreatim7u,isju- thecupboard,it will be selling its most r;" ' bilant bemuse its foreign sales rose advanced and nastiest non-nuclear alk I t sharply last year—to all of a6om mu. weapons:the quietest submarines,for 1 i A `911 j 1 .� tiles.Admittedly, in a country where example,or the missiles being used, -I;j�' average monthly wages are only with mixed results,alongside the tanks sound$5%money goes a lot further. and guns in Chechnya.One such,the Arsenal is taking on Son extra staff to 7bchka-u, can blast a seven-hectare help meet this year's order-book and area with cluster bombs.Another,the �' ffimd more than doubling salaries.Ty doing ros-1,is a rocketthaideliversaclouc: that at Raytheon. exploding fuel vapour,creating an ef- Buy while stocks last Barringadrastic,and probably im- fect like a smallnuclearweapon. possible,remilitansation of the emn. The new defence spending—if it ever creptoutof(befog and killed at leastaoRus- omy,Russia will restore its arms industries materialises—will do nothing to restore Rus- sian paramilitary police,underlined Russian only with outside help.India is one candi. sian military research.Rather than going on forces need for equipment that works de- date;China,which seems to want enough new high-tech aircraft and ships,the money spitepoorvisibility, muscle to deter America fromdefending7ai- willbe spent keeping Russia's nuclear arse- Eventually,Russia's arms catalogues will wan,another.But both countries really want net safe and usable,and upgrading basic in- start To look distinctly skimpy.There is no to build their own defence industries,not to fanny kit such as radios and body amour.A sign that Russia can develop a new genera- subsidisethoseofadecliningempim with an recent ambush,in which Chechen fighters tion ofconventional weapons. uncertaintemper. Water from ordinary people.The key ato price wa- ter Nor any drop to drink ernments dohetruecoswill hviean.incen- emmenis do this,firms will have an incen- tive to invest,and consumers to conserve Although private provision of water is a controversial notion,it is not a radical one Most governments do a poor job of delivering water and sewerage services. France has allowed firms in manage water Can the private sector do any better? through long-tens concessions for more thana century.Adecade ago,Britain handed CHERRAPUNJIisoneof the wettest spots to the middle and upper classes.The poor control of its water assets over to private on earth.A typical year sees more than rarely have access to sewerage or piped wa- firms.C6tcd'lvoire gave control ofwaterser- 37 feet(it metres)ofainfall.In another part ter.Out of desperation,they endure open vice for its capital to the privamsectorseveral ofindia lies Gopalpura,which receives only sewers and have to buy water,often of du- decades ag%Abidjan is one of the few Aid- a few inches of min a year.Guess which has bious quality,from private vendors from the can cities with reliable supplies. Even so, thewatershortage? backs of lorries.Even in Haiti,the poorest private investment in water lags behind that The answer reveals much about what is placein the Americas,slumdwellers pay too in other infrastructure(see chan). wrong with how the world treats water. __..___.__ _ _ _ _ _ The world's few water multinationals Chemapunji in north-eastern India fritters Blocked pipes are looking abroad partly because their away its fresh watepand suffers from short- mvem,nert in iMr.n.mm Proiecawah private home markets are maws Bill Alexander, ages.In Gopalpum,a drought-prone village omtnipation in rlevewi,muntne, head of Britain's Thames Water,now wants 1990 sit fM o so atl 1. :W xsa v Rajasthan, local people have learnt to hdereguoeama third ofitbeand from out- valuadly,freshwater of the wouscommodity. 7CIEEEimnry s � 1 side opportunities, es But be and re govems Sadly, most of the world is more like sresv �---1 see opportunities,especiallywheregovem- Cherrapunji. Most governments have so nM Mq [::: 1 ' I ments havebegun to price water property. mismanaged supplies that much of the watraneunaaroa Lj From Jakarta to Mexico city, private world's fresh water is wasted. That is the firms are helping governments to improve main reason nearly one in five ofthe world's '----"- -'- -'- ' '-""- -"- - bill collections,reduce leakage and upgrade peoplelackswmsstosafe,reliablewater. times what the"morally repugnant elites" infrastructure. Only about 36om people This ismostvisible inthesprawlingcities (as they take perverse pride in calling them. now receive their water from private firms. of the developing world.With the encour- selves)pay for water piped to the hillside But France's Sun Lyonnaise reckons that fig- agement of international donors, govern- mansions that rise above Pon-au-Prince. ure will rise by to%a year over the next five mens have invested in urban water infra- Reversing this by=25,reckons William years. Already, the fine boasts of serving smicmre,and they provide water at rates Cosgrove,one of the water"pens who or- worn customers;Gerard Payen,the boss of well below the cost of provision,Unfortu- ganised a big water summit this week in the its water division,sees revenue from water nately,this strategy born of good intentions Hague,will need the current investment in increasing from CH billion ($7.7 billion)to has in practice created a morass ofbureauc- water infrastructure to be more than dou. C13 billion within five years. racy and corruption. I bled,to$i8o billion a year.where will the Such ambition fuels the suspicions of Though govemmenuspendafonuneon money come from?The answer is chiefly those who fear that the poor will be the for urban water utilities,the main benefits flow from the private sector, with much help victims.But the early experience of reform •„E ECONOMIST Ma.Ca as'n,2000 69 BUSINESS suggests that the opposite is true. Buenos Aires was one of the first cities to award wa- ter concessions.Sun Lyonnaise inherited an unpopular state utility with murky finances and limited reach. The firm has since in- vested si billion to upgrade equipment and expanded its reach by rbm people,without raising water rates.In Santiago,Chile,offi- cials have introduced a means-tested"water stamps'scheme that covers pan of the cost r, for the poorest citizens;the private firm run- ning the city's water now has a clear incen- tive to serve the poor,who are paying cus- tomerEjust like the fat catsdown the road `sr_51 Benefits are to be had in rich countries too.America accounted for roughly a quar t cry, ter of the Sgco billion or so in revenues 1`1_ earned globally by water companies both public and private,last year.Yet its market is not only heavily regulated, but also frag ayf. mented: tens of thousands of municipal— w monopolies provide nearly all of its water Better than Coca-Cola and sewerage The municipalities are now looking for private help as the Environmen- poor ends up in agriculture.And most of it month faradam and irrigation project tothe tal Protection Agency imposes standards on ends up with relatively wellofffarners. fine that requires the smallest subsidy. water quality that municipalities cannot sat- Take the capital city of India's Tamil The hest evidence that big changes are isfy without outside financing and expertise. Nadu, Chennai, a festering, overgrown afoot comes from Victoria,Australia.A fiscal The French multinationals have again metropolis that is often hit by water short- crisis there ledofficials toslash thesubsidies been especially successful here In the few ages.Mindful that the city's residents grew that were provided to farmers for water. years since Atlanta let Suez Lyonnaise take ever unhappier,politicians have cooked up When unhappy farmers were confronted over its water concession,the Jinn has re- various schemes to bring water in from far- with bills that reflected the true cost of pro- duced costs considerably.it capped a wave away places. Yet the state still gives water viding water,they started asking uncomfort. of acquisitions last year by spending$4 bil. away free to farmers,who grow such thirsty able questions.They organised themselves Jim on Nalco Chemical, a water-services crops as sugar cane.In California,well-con- intoa water-umn'wllective,anddemanded company.its compatriot and arch-rival,Y- netted farmers grow rice in the desert,even reforms in the irrigation agency.Although vendi,spent S6 billion last year on us Filter, as Los Angeles begs for water. the agency remained in government hands, America's biggest water-equipmcnt busi. such unprecedented scrutiny led to a qo% nests.Even if municipal contracts are slow in liquidassem dropincons. coming,these firms reckon they can make However,although all agree that agriculture Indeed,although consumers have com- money by helping towns and industries to is panof the water puzzle,not everybody ac- plained about water privatisation in such satisfy the EPA. cepts that privatisation is the answer.Patrick countries as Britain,private management is In future,private firms might introduce McCully of the International Rivers Net. not always unpopular.InLa Paz,Bolivia,of. other innovations.Rebecca Mark,the head work, an activist group that campaigns ficials and Suez Lyonnaise involved local of Azurix,an offshoot of Enron,an energy against big dams,detects a"global hydro-aid poor people in deciding what water services company,believes that the increased varia- complex",composed of international ages- they needed.After people voluntarily can- bilityintemperatures.the rising intensity of Gies such as the World Bank and private wa- tributed their time and labour,they reduced stoma and especially falling water levels ter multinationals,that is behind initiatives the costs by two-thirds.Sunita Narain,of In- across the country am prompting Americans such as this week's summit.But this is surely dia's Centre for Science and Environment, topress their politicians torefonm water sub- an exaggeration.For the foreseeable furore, believes that empowering users often turns sidies. Th speed this along, her firm has many of the world's poor farmers must rely up inexpensive ideas,such as age-old tech- launched an himmet-based scheme for trad- on subsidised irrigation monopolies for wa- niques ofminwater harvesting,that govem- inglarge quantities of water among towns, ter.Political pressure means that thoseiniga- ments and firms dismiss as old-fashioned. fanners and others with water rights."We tion monopolies will probably go on being These successes suggest that the rich waste enornousquarmitiesof water because runbythegovemmem. world and the poor may yet son out the no market exists;'she says.She boasts that Even then, private-sector panicipation witch's brew,ofpolitics,subsidies and opac- by acting up a market her firm has"created can make a difference.In setting up a con- ity that bedevils their water. After all, something completely different,unlike the tract argues the World Bank's John Briscoe, whether it is Australia or Rajasthan,once French who have piddled around with this "issues that have long been submerged will peopleunderstandthetmecostofwaterser- industry forthe Past u5nyearsP be brought into the glare of public scrutiny: vices, they will conserve water, and even The private sector's impact on urban wa- what is the service level tobe provided?How help to dig ditches if necessary. in return, ter services on thus be dramatic But wen- will it be monitored?what will be paid for they will want transparent prices and better parties will not be able to satisfy surging ur- the service by whom?"This makes the subsi- service from both governments and private ban demand unless rural supplies of water dies explicit,the first crucial step to ensuring firms.Economic development has brought are also properly managed.The countryside that they end up with the neediest. developing countries such wonders asmIc- is where 85%of all water is used in Africa, And subsidies are not incompatible vision and Coca-Cola.By coupling markets Asia and Central America.Across theworld, with private-sector management.The mar- with people power,refotmers may yet bring most of the Sao billion-qo billion in water ket-minded authorities in Chile are prepar- them fresh watertoo. subsidies spent by governments to help the ing to award a long-term concession next 70 1.....uwur w..cx s+x aaoo 03/21/2000 21:27 7509447952 STEVE ACETI CALCOAST PAGE 01/03 � e— I at California Coastal Coalition J - � 1133 Second Street Suite G Encinitas, CA 92024 STEVEN 9.CETI,J.D. 760.944.3564 telephone Psecative Director 760944.7852 fax steveaeeG@amnet March 21, 2000 VIA TELECOPY(202)778-0214 Howard Marlowe, President American Coastal Coalition 1667 K Street NW Suite 480 Washington, DC 20006 Re: Legislation Needed to Reform ACOE Funding Process Dear Howard: As you know, the Army Corps of Engineers has from time-to-time declined to recommend some beach nourishment projects in California because they"do not meet Federal budget priorities.' These priorities, which have been set by the White House Office of Management and Budget and by the Corps of Engineers, essentially require that the value of the property protected by a proposed beach nourishment project exceed the 50-year cost of the project. This method of calculating a Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) is not mandated by statute. It was apparently developed on the theory that the primary purpose of a 'shore protection" project (to use the Corps' terminology) is storm damage reduction. For example, a recent Army Corps of Engineers Reconnaissance Report on a segment of California's coastline contains the following statement of policy: 'Federal participation in measures to provide separable recreation opportunities at shore protection projects is not permitted by current budget policies. However, the Corps of Engineers can participate in shore protection plans that result in recreation benefits if those benefis are incidental to Calcaast is an advocacy organimdon comprised of coastal mmmonium and intalaat gloaps w .calcoast.org 03/21/2000 21:27 7609447852 STEVE ACETI CALCOAST PAGE 02/03 storm damage reduction features and not the primary output." (emphasis added) The "current budget policies" referred to above are contradictory to the underlying federal statute that gives the Corps authority to participate in beach nourishment projects. That law states— "With the purpose of preventing damage to the shores and beaches of the United States, its Territories and possessions and promoting and encouraging the healthful recreation of the people, it is declared to be the policy of the United States.... to promote shore protection projects and related research that encourage the protection, restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach restoration and periodic beach nourishment, on a comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Government, Stales, localities, and private enterprises." (33 USC 426e(a)) Healthy beaches provide recreation areas, storm damage reduction, and environmental habitat enhancement; all of which are important benefits_ We see no reason to devaluate the recreational benefits of beaches vis-a-vis storm protection. Accordingly, we ask the American Coastal Coalition to sponsor legislation during this session of Congress that requires the Army Corps of Engineers to count recreational benefits on the same basis as other types of quantifiable benefits that are derived from renourishing a beach. Furthermore, we are requesting members of the California congressional delegation to co-sponsor and support such legislation and to seek the assistance of their colleagues from other coastal states in enacting this proposal into law. Thank you for considering this request and for all your efforts on behalf of the nation's coastal communities. Sincerely, t5 eve Aceti co: California Congressional Delegation (via telecopy) CalCoast Members (via telecopy) (list attached) CalCoa¢t is an advocacy organimtfon rompnsad of coastal communidrs and interact groups www.catcoast.org 03/21/2000 21:27 7609447852 U®es: CALCOAST * Caglmrda Coascd Caaftm,Advocacy for Castle!Commander 760.94 356 (ftvmaeeti@Mm) www.cdeovcorg County of Los Angeles American Coastal Cashion County Of Orange American Share and Batch Preservation Association Caunty of San Diego Sayurekh Producbons Orange County Sandadon Oist" Bettencaun&Associates City of Carlsbad Cardiff-By-The Sea Chamber of Commerce City of Carporaer® Carlsbad Convention and Vadars Bureau City of Cosmetic Coastal Frontiers Corpo ice City of Dana Point - Concept Marine Assaeiatea City of Del Mar Cal'domia Shore and Beach Preservation Association City of Encinitas Downtasn Encinitas MaMSbeel Association City of Eureka Ec.-Systems Management Assocation,Inc. City of Hermosa Beach Enemb s;Chamber of Commerce of Huntington Huntington South Faria Beech HOmece nM Association roper Beach Gmup Ueda Consultants ry d :agtma Beach Headlands Reserve,LLC Ay of Lung Beach a th.da Homan City of MaBbu MEC Anabyecal System City of Mttm Say Moffatt&Nichol Engineers City of Navport ch Noble Consultants Oceanside Ogden Envamtmental&Energy Services City of Pacific Grove Playa Vista City of Pismo Beach Resmanua Raw Business Amocialim CRY of Part Huenone ReSmre the Share City of Redondo Beach San Clegg Gas&Elecroic City of San Buenaventura San Diego NoM Convention&Vadors Bureau CRY Of San Clemente Seacoast Presentation Association City of Sand City ,Self Reelcelion Fellowship Church City of Seal Beach Skman,Lamm&Marsh City of Solana Beach Skelly Engineering AM13AG Southwest Community Bank BEACON TEG International SANDAL -Portal odog ofmmrbos(01-00) National , Research VOLUME 9 NUMBER 1 WINTER 2000 UV 2000 Symposium Focuses on Revising 1993 UV Guidelines Ihaviolet (UV) technology is used through In late January 2000, NWRI convened a 2-day out the United States in the treatment of symposium that focused on the technical, wastewater and red.im d water, but has financial, and regulatory challenges facing water ] never developed as a mainstream technology for and wastewater utilities that are interested in using the treatment of drinking water. UV disinfection for drinking water treatment. Previously, UV had beat considered as less Over 170 people attended UV 2000:A Technical potent than the conventional disinfectants, Symposium, which was sponsored by the NWRI chlorine dioxide and ozone, in inactivating micro- organisms. However, it has been found that low doses of UV can sterilize certain microorganisms, t effectively eliminating the spread of future popu- Sp CH4.M E)dr. ion, P.E. I lations in drinking water. Consequently, UV may lCH2M.getscvssed the j be more cost-effective and efficient than either krioskdge�m reh� j chlorine or ozone in purifying drinking water. hY &vixahirr w 0ho The immediate advantages of using UV ds- TxMkd Rogrom Chou 01 infection as either a supplement or replacement of UV 2000 chlorine or ozone include: Corporate AsorJates and hell in collaboration A significant level of microbial disinfection, with the California Deparbnent of Health Services. including the inactivation of Cryptosporidium There were 24 symposium speakers. who and Giardia at low doses. presented on subjects rarigng from'The Status of Low operating costs. UV Technology in Europe' to'Standardizing UV Minimal formation of disinfection by-products. Continued on Page 8 Call for Nominations: Utility LeadershipCentury...r The 2000 Clarke Prize the Next Century......2 Riverbank Frltmtion...4 Califomio MTBE he Athalie Richardson Irvine Ciarke Prize is presented Research Partnership..5 annually for demonstrated excellence in the fields of Focus on water science and technology. Nomination packets are Orange County's now available by contacting NWRI or by visiting the NWRI Water Future._.--._..6 web site at www.ocwd.com/NWRI. -ter The Vision and the Visionary: Utility Leadership for the Next Century blic expectation of both water and waste- investors) to meet future needs and expectations. In water utilities Is changing.These expectations other words, the visionary plan will "empower' all re now focusing on public health, those involved. environmental protection, and cost efficiency. To Therefore, the visionary plan will be compre- meet these expectations, utilities in the 21st Century hensive and adaptable, with clear and measurable will need to be flexible and customer-oriented. They long-term goals. In addition, the plan will have a will need to be more open and sophisticated. Most leader or leadership team that will be responsible for importantly, they will need to encourage a new style of utility leadership that is inclusive and business-oriented as well as farsighted. However, in most instances, existing utility leadership is ill prepared to meet these growing expectations. In October 1999, NWRI held an intense, 2-day Nominal Group Technique (NGT) " workshop to examine the organizational issues — from planning processes to employee welfare — associated with utility leadership. To do this, the Utility leadership NGT workshop invited 21 recognized leaders _ from across the nation to focus on the single `s I question: What are the most Important strategic and operational leadership skills - needed throughout utilities in the 21st Century? Wniel Fhnagan,Jr.IUnisersiy d SoWM1ern Cdilanml empMsimd As a result, the workshop participants identified the aporiarxe of enimperieaml and(namial leadership skills, and prioritized the basic leadership principles that are such as using asaire.os o linororg pal. essential in a well-inn utility as well as obstacles to those principals. They determined that the top Its continual review, modification, and implemen- priority of utility leadership is the development of a tction. Finally, the leadership team will collaborate global, visionary plan that will incorporate the with the stakeholders so that everyone—leaders and interests, cooperation, and feedback of all stake- stakeholders alike — will "own" and be responsible holders (including customers, employees, and for the development and implementation of the Visionary plan. Workshop participant Cynthia Jones, Director of the Dublin San Ramon Services District (California), noted that, "As leaders,we all learned that to achieve :+. success on a long-term basis, others must be invited to participate—to buy-in and help the leader succeed. y� Therefore, the buy-in, with the right stakeholders, allows and insures the leader's visionary success." Integral to the visionary plan is a 10-year vision statement, which defines the strategic direction that - the utility will follow. "A vision statement identifies strategic goals," said Robert Carnahan, Associate _ Dean of Research at the College of Engineering at 1 the University of South Florida. "It forces the development and implementation of a plan that includes alternative courses of action." I Workshop participant Paul Thormodsgard, (Fran left)I.,Mons f0i,d Aiken, 5ourh CordimJ, empho, Executive Director of Green Bay Metropolitan sized riegot o m and m ifi lxa while Peter Dab," Pii,of Sewerage District (Wisconsin), emphasized that Houston, Terns)and Ronald Yourg, PE (Mokdm Pirnie, tri developing consensus around the vision statement Page 2 1 discussed canmunicoiion as a sualegic kmisaftip sk 1, was, perhaps, the most important element of the inclusive,visionary plan. He "Visionary leadership is a 'strategic' retirees and those approach- said, "Consensus helps ability...the ability to anticipate .aig retirement age to act as assure the continuity of mentors or apprenticeship problems before they happen." programs and reduces mis- instructors. "The retiring understanding" as well as —ROBFRr BROnliMON long-term employees will "provides for plans that can Director of Public Works and Utilities, have greater value as be broadly supported by the City of Dunedin(Florida) teachers rather than doers," governing board and staff' added Knipple. Now, behind that visionary plan, of course, Is Altogether, these priorities emphasized insight, visionary leadership. The workshop participants had teamwork, communication, and flexibility. Detailed several definitions of utility leadership: discussions of each priority can be found in the • Utility leaders champion applied technologies. Utility Leadership Workshop Report(1999),which • Utility leaders build customer loyalty that goes is available by contacting NWRI. beyond satisfaction. Held at the Kellogg West Conference Center & • Utility leaders support,educate,and communicate Lodge in Pomona, California, the Utility Leadership with the public. - NGT workshop was sponsored by the University of • Utility leaders train employees to look for solutions. Southern Florida, University of Southern California, • Utility leaders are"user-friendly." - Malcolm Purim, Inc., and NWRI. The workshop was However, visionary leadership includes all these the first activity organized by NWRI's Center for elements and more. Visionary leaders must possess Fxcetieroe in Utility leadership,which was established two critical skills: the ability to see the issues and in 1998 to distribute and integrate data as well as solutions at hand, and the ability to convince others discern research needs in the area of utility leadership. of the importance of these issues and solutions. - 'Visionary leadership is a 'strategic' ability," said Robert Brotherton, Director of Public Works and Utilities for the City of Dunedin(Florida). "This is the ability to see into the future and to make adjustments now; the ability to recognize and to understand synergistic opportunities. It includes the ability to anticipate problems before they happen." Accordingly, there are several ways to develop Visionary leadership skills.These include participating in professional organizations, community functions, .a . and networking opportunities; reading technical journals;and knowing and communicating with local and state legislators. While visionary planning was the top priority, the workshop participants also identified nine other Y . important strategic and operational skills needed for well-run water and wastewater utilities. These fFran kA) Widbm Knecht IClnclnros Watt' W doh deceased priorities ranged from upgrading entrepreneurial and .wotaglc pkmmtg passes while Gr.Jd r ppd Kry of fake financial leadership skills to providing for the welfare Oswego, Osegon)and Reru Khobr, PhD fllni swirl of-%A of all utility employees. Florida)encaxoged wihwn b"emp—'employees. For instance, Gerald Knipple, Field Maintenance Manager for the City of Oswego(Oregon),suggested Overall,the importance of the workshop lay in the that utility leaders should prepare in advance for the fact that it brought together leaders from throughout retirement of the "Baby Boomer" generation by the United States to reach consensus on the essential transferring the wisdom and experience of "Baby and fundamental qualities that define utility Boomers"to entry-level employees. "Though we find 1. leadership for the next century. As noted by Peter that entrants into today's job market have a higher Dobrolskd, Senior Assistant Director of the City of level of formal education,"he noted,"they often lack Houston Public Works and Engineering Department the physical skills and 'real world experience' to best (Texas). "Leadership of this capacity cannot be apply their knowledge and education." defined by one person alone. It must be put together Therefore, utility leaders might consider using by groups like this." i Page 3 Riverbank Filtration: A Low-Cost Water Treatment Technology n November 1999, NWRI invited American and alternative to filtration systems for microbial European experts to the International Riverbank pathogen control. Rltration Conference in Louisville, Kentucky to "With rising concerns about the quality of river promote the benefits and potential of using riverbank water and that of water from recovery wells for drink- filtration, a low-cost— and, potentially, efficient — ing, riverbank filtration research more recently has alternative water treatment,within the United States. There are two immediate benefits to the increased use of riverbank filtration within the United States. 'Bank filtration is able to replace 1) Minimized needs for adding chemicals like ,,,treatment steps[which]leads to a - disinfectants and coagulants to surface water to decrease of water treatment residuals." control pathogens. 2) Decreased costs to the community without —PROF. DR. WOI.FGANG KOM increased risk to human health. DVG Water Technology Center(Germany) But what, exactly, is riverbank filtration? River water naturally percolates through the ground and into aquifers,or layers of sand and gravel increased Iwillim the United Stated,"said conference that contain water. During the percolation process, speaker Herman Bouwer of the U.S. Deparonent of potential contaminants are filtered from the water. Agriculture, Water Conservation Laboratory Consequently, aquifers retain water of a higher (Arizona). quality than found in the river. Water utilities then Riverbank filtration has proven to be invaluable in pump the groundwater from the aquifers through treating drinking water in Europe. Studies have production wells,treat it,and deliver it to consumers. shown that riverbank filtration can remove a In riverbank filtration, production wells, which are substantial percentage of organic compounds found located near the river,continuously pump groundwater in raw river water — including harmful pathogens such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Production Well "Riverbank filtration is the River Channel most important pretreatment low Permeable step in drinking water t Water Table Minimal Streambed production from polluted river Sand and Gravel Head Differential water,"said conference speaker Prof.Dr.Eckhard Worch,of the Dresden University of Pumping Water Minimal Surfac Water Technology, Institute of Water Table' / Mixing with Groundwater Chemistry (Germany). "During infiltration and underground transport, processes such as filtration, adsorption, and Regional Groundwater biological degradation produce a significant improvement in raw water quality." A simplified graphic According to conference represenrotlon of a from aquifers. Because of differential pressure, river speaker Prof.Dr.Wolfgang Kuhn,of the DVG Water riverbank filtration system water Flows underground and refills the aquifers at a Technology Center (Germany), riverbank filtration with o produaim well faster rate than normal. In effect,the filtration process has multiple advantages. These include "the acts as a pretreatment step by removing certain protection against shock loads and the removal of contaminants. nearly SO percent of all biodegradable For more than 75 years, riverbank filtration has compounds...moreover, bank filtration is able to been used in Europe, most notably along the Rhine, replace or support treatment steps in the waterworks. Elbe, and Danube Rivers, to produce drinking water. This leads to a decrease of water treatment Although nverbmk filtration is not commonly utilized residuals." in the United States, interest is increasing in using NWRI organized this conference to bring together Page 4 1 riverbank filtration as a low-cost complement or Continued on Page 5 The California MTBE Research ParFnership Cracks Down on MTBE After 2 years of research and review, the Completed Reports: California MTBE Research Partnership has • Executive Summary:Treatment completed several projects and released a Technologies for Removal of Tmrmmr Terluwlopa fm number of significant reports that investigate treat- Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether aaa of MMyl Tcni. ment technologies for methyl tertiary butyl ether Hvg1 Era ihrrBE)avm A Stripping. Air S (MTBE). MTBE is a gasoline additive that has (MTBE) from Drinking Water: aiwax w.wr. contaminated various surface and groundwater Apping. Advanced Oxi- .uamer�s dal supplies throughout California. bn Processes, Granular Acti- Since 1997, the California MTBE Research valed Carbon' Synthetic Resin •c..wsm..w u.ev. Partnership has directed a statewide research Sorbents,Second Edition ' �ii°"""�°s°'°'"• program to investigate and develop MTBE treatment • Treatment Technologies for technology and source protection issues. It is a Removal of Methyl Tertiary cooperative program formed by the Western States Butyl Ether (MTBE) from Petroleum Association (WSPA), Oxygenated Fuels prinking Water: Air Stopping, 7TBE Association (OFA), and Association of CaliforniaAdvanced Oxidation PrWater Agencies (ACWA). NWRI acts as programmanager to organize and implement MTBE researchGranular Activated Carbon, needs. Please contact NWRI for a copy of the Synthetic Resin Sorbents, completed research reports. Second Edition Completed Projects: • Evaluation of Synthetic Resin Sorbents forM • Survey of Current UST Management and Removal from Water Opem0w Practices • Distribution of Ethanol in Shallow Groundwater at Survey of UST Management and Selected Sites OOperationn Practices • In Situ Treatment of MTBE at Vandenberg Air • Trace Analysis of Ethanol and MTBE in Water Force Base Using Solid Phase Miaoextraction and GC/MS Preliminary Evaluation of Activated Carbon Technology Using Rapid Small Scale Column • Modeling the Impact of Ethanol on the Persistence Tests(RSSCfs) of BTEX Compounds in Gasolfneconlaminated • Evaluation of Synthetic Resin Sorbents for MTBE Gmourdwaler(available in March). Removal from Water • Accelerated Courtin Testing (ACT) to Determine Copies of the reports are also available on Feasibility of MTBE Removal NWRI's website: www.ocud.com/NWRI Riverbank Filtration Continued Imm Page g leading experts to discuss riverbank filtration and to Conference participants also visited two local determine research needs. Among these research riverbank-filtration facflities: the Louisville Water needs, said Peter Literathy of the VI'fUKI RT Company and the Cincinnati Water Works. Institute for Water Pollution Control (Hungary), was Currently, the Louisville Water Company is studying the need to "understand both the short and long- the effectiveness of riverbank filtration processes on term late and effects of the pollutants in water the bank of the Ohio River,and the Cincinnati Water resources." Works is completing an extensive flowpath study at "The quality of the bank-filtered water depends on the Charles M. Bolton Well Field, adjacent to the that of the surface water and varies according to the Great Miami River. composition of the river bed, the filtration efficiency, The International Riverbank Filtration Conference and whether there are aerobic or anaerobic was sponsored in cooperation with the LouisvNe conditions." he said. "All of these affect the concert- Water Company, Cincinnati Water Works, and U.S. (ration of the different pollutants in the bank-filtered &Mronmental Protection Agency.To receive a copy water,and the water treatment technologies have to I of the abstracts presented at the conference, which 6e adjusted accordingly." are available for$15.00, please contact NWRI. Page 5 Looking Forward Together: Water and Orange County's Future By WILLIAM BLOhIQUIST, PhD, Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at Indiana University, Indianapolis Water plays a central role in Orange between recreation and parks and water? Is there a County's past, present, and — certainly relationship between tourism and water? If the Its future. That message, among answer is yes to any of those,it makes it real easy to others, came through loud and clear for the nearly we why we all should be spending time working on 150 attendees at the first Orange County Water the issue of water. Because the economy of Orange Conference on October 29, 1999 at the Beckman County is dependent on these industries." Center in Irvine, California. From a local government perspective,Janet Huston The setting for this important event — of the League of California Cities, Orange County Orange County, California — contains Division said that it is essential to coordinate the nearly three million people,and an economy services provided by water and sanitation districts with that would rank among the world's largest if other public services provided by municipalities and the compared with other nations. This dynamic county is not only growing rapidly but also witnessing remarkable transformations in The purpose of the conference was the composition of Its population,land uses, to provide, share, and reflect upon and key economic sectors. the importance of water .1 Orange County also contains part of one major watershed — that of the Santa Ana to the County as a whole. River—and all of three smaller ones.There are more than 30 public and private water county in order to assure development that achieves the suppliers, ranging in size from a few high expectations of living in Orange County. Pr1ae111, wen:,„N thousand to hundreds of thousands of Orange County's County Executive Officer Janice Blo.ngmsr s Ch." customers,and there are separate public agencies for Mittermeier shared a similar viewpoint: "Our water of the NWRI groundwater management, imported water supply, agencies have been very successful. We want to Knowledge and flood control. continue to develop partnerships with them in our Monog.enr role as the regional planning agency for the county." Commlllee and Diverse Interests Come Together Timothy Brick from the Board of Directors of the eob,a hcilirabr for The Orange County Water Conference—the lust Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Tocw an Orange of its kind in the county—brought together people of continued the theme of water's connection to quality Ccyrvys Wo er diverse interests to discuss water issues that they have of life with a perspective on the environment. He Fusee.' said, "We have to develop water resources in a way in common.Both the audience and speakers included individuals from business,local and state government, that minimizes damage to the natural environment" and academia as well as from water agencies at the He later added that whenever possible, we need to local, regional, state,and national levels. find ways to combine water development efforts with As a project under a multi-agency effort called environmental protection goals. "Focus on Orange County's Water Future," the purpose of the conference was to provide,share,and "Focus" Highlights Future Needs reflect upon Information about the importance of Altogether, the conference served as a fitting water to Orange County as a whole.The conference culmination of the first year of "Focus on Orange theme, "Looking Forward Together: Water and County's Water Future." It brought many important Orange County's Future," provided a unifying note. issues to light, including the need for communication Speaking from an economic development and cooperation among the public and private perspective, Robert Bein, CEO of REIF&Associates sectors,water utilities,and the government. as well as chair of the Infrastructure Committee of In the year ahead, "Focus"will develop further as the Orange County Business Council, posed a series an energetic and constructive partnership to promote of questions: a fuller and more useful knowledge base on a "Is there a relationship between agriculture and regional scale for water resource planning. This will water? Is there a relationship behmen high-tech occur through the integration of information from production and water? Is there a relationship the many planning activities and the involvement of between the wastewater elimination and the water water agency policy makers and managers as well as I supply? Is there a relationship between residential the many other interested citizens outside the water Page 6 1 development and water? Is there a relationship agency community. JIJJI1JJtJJ ��'l�tJf� , Conference 1 Workshop Registration ' Innovations in Classic and "Salt Content in Brine Streams: Conventional Water Treatment New Concerns for Processes: A Conference Water Treatment and Reuse" September 26-29, 2000 March 29, 2000 Amsterdam, The Netherlands Phoenix,Arizona This conference will bring together representatives This program will provide information on the most from industry,government,academia,and the public cament activities in water recycling at the local, and private sector to explore water treatment regional, and national level. The information is processes in drinking,domestic,and industrial water geared to provide immediately useful tools for production. It includes the treatment of groundwater, professionals involved in developing,expanding and bankfiltered water, rainwater, river and lake water, managing recycling water programs. filterbackwash water, and industrial wastewater, with classic and conventional treatment processes. Sponsored by: Sponsored by: WateReuse Association International Water Association In conjunction with: Biwa N.V. Research and Consultancy City of Phoenix,Water Services Department Rhenish-Westphalian Institute for Water Research For further information,please contact: In conjunction with: WateReuse Association Aquatech Amsterdam 2000 915 L Street,Suite 1000 For further information,please contact: Sacramento,California 95814 Phone: (916)442-2746 P.V. Reser.arch J.C.and Goers Fax: (916)442-0382 Kiwa N.V. Research and Consultancy The Netherlands Website:www.watereuse.org Phone: +31 30 60 69 532 — Fax: +31 30 60 61 165 Request for Proposals Email:)schippe®kiwaoa.nl Water Environment Prof.Dcing. R. Gimbel Research Foundation MW/,Rhenish-Westphalian hrstibt a for Water Germany The Water Environment Research Foundation Phone: +49 208 40 30 3301 manages a basic and applied research program seek- Fax: +49 208 40 30 383 ing scientifically sound solutions to existing and Email: Gimbel®uni-duisburg.de emerging challenges to the environment and human health. Board Meeting _---- Proposals are due: National Water Research Institute March 17, 2000 Semi-Annual Far a detailed description of the Request for Proposals Research Advisory Board Meeting (RFPs),we the Water Environment Research Founda- tion's websile at www.weriorg. For a complete RFP April 28.30, 2000 package,please contact: DWstFTxEE HOTEL Water Environment Research Foundation Costa Mesa, California 601 Wythe Street The NWRI Research Advisory Board (RAB) will Alexandria.VA 22314-1994 j meet to prepare NWRI research agenda for the Phone: (703)684-2470 upcoming year and to review current research Fax:(703) 299-0742 projects. Website: www.werf.org Page 7 NWRI Office News Congratulations to Stephen Re Lyon, Ph.D. Recently, Stephen R. Lyon satisfied all the degree in Biology at San doctoral requirements and will receive a Ph.D. Diego State University. L from the University of California, Irvine, I With a background that where he studied microbial biollims in chemically ranges from oceanography strewed soil. He is now a microbiologist at the to molecular biology, Dr. Biotechnology Research Department at the Orange Lyon is interested in studying County Water District and is working on the micro- environmental problems on a bial ecology of recharge-basin sediments. variety of levels. He has Dr. Lyon completed his undergraduate studies in lectured throughout the Oceanography and Umnology at Humboldt State United States and abroad on University (California) and Uppsala University various topics In micro- (Sweden). Throughout most of the 1980s, he was a biology, applied ecology, and multivadate statistics. staff scientist with the San Diego Region Water When he 6 not in the laboratory,then it is almost Reclamation Agency, where he co-authored a certain that Dr. Lyon — NWRI's Technical number of articles on alternative water-treatment Information Specialist — Is updating NWRI's web processes..During that time, he received a Masters i page, "World of Water." W 2000: A Technical Symposium Connlnued from Page I Equipment Performance Validation." There was also UV disinfection facilities throughout[California)."But, a review of national W research programs, such as It is now time to revise the guidelines so that they the Electric Power Research Institute's 3-year reflect the"current state of the knowledge,"including program to develop a pulsed-UV unit for the expanded discussions on topics such as closed pipe disinfection of drinking water. systems, pWsed-UV, low-Pressure high intensity UV, However, the symposium quickly focused on the and medium-pressure UV technology. overall need to update and revise the UV The revision process will include organizing a Disinfection Guidelines for Wastewater Reclama. working group of experts that will revise and update the tion in California and UV Disinfection Research 1993 Guidelines, bringing it into line with research National Water Needs, published by NWRI in 1993. Presently, the results, field experiences, performance, and reliability, Research Institute 1993 Guidelines have been adopted by more than 20 as well as Include consideration of drinking water issues. U.S. slates and by Australia. The revised guidelines will be available in fall 2000. 10500 Ellis Avenue According to Richard Sakaji, Ph.D. of the • Further information about the symposium P.O.Box 20865 California Department of Health Services, the 1993 presentations can be found in the UV 2000: A Guidelines have, in the past 6 years, "served as a Technfcal Symposium Abstracts,which are available Fountain Valley,EA template for the design and construction of several for $15.00. Please contact NWRI for a copy. 92728-0865 (714)3783278 UV-2000 panahm inclvded (!tam lehl'Robed HAciv r ` Fax:(714) 378.3375 lCodanm Depanmentof u Heollh Se,vlces); www.acwd.com/NWRI I Richrnd 5okaji, Ph.D. (California Depo,eranv of i Health semces):Moderator Editor:Gina Melin ! 7emes Crack, AD f (Block&Va nch); E-mail: Eho Pons, P.E. nwri ina®hotmaiLmm IPlwido Deponmem of Ir B Environmental Rorecoon); Daniel&hmelling IUniad Srcna EnWronmental Protection Agency);and Dr, Olul Hoye, IDVGW testing laborarory, Ge myl Page 8 ' � � VWIW� IIV VV�' Rebuild America Coalition names new chairman Organization's goals in step with APWA objectives ANN MCCULLOCH MANAGER, REBUILD AMERICA COALITION, AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 5 preading the word on the spurred its revitalization. In 1998, "We will continue to Importance of Infrastructure Toledo received national recognition point out the issues to economic competi- for its achievements when it was tiveness and overall quality of life awarded the National Civic League's tremendous public Issues will be the primary focus of the All-America City Award, one of only benefits we receive Rebuild America Coalition's public 10 cities to receive such an honor. from our awareness efforts this year. Managed out of APWA's transportation Washington office, the coalition systems, water includes 50 public and private organizations as well as 15 active infrastructure, and state and local Rebuild efforts. other public facilities." Led by a new chairman, Mayor Carleton S. (Carty) Finkbeiner of Toledo, Ohio, the organization for the Rebuild America Coalition. will continue to promote its mes. "Mayor Finkbeiner shares that sage among lawmakers, the media, vision and is eager to work with and the general public. us to raise the priority of infra- structure issues at all levels of gov- 'lt Is an honor to serve as ernment. We are very pleased to chairman of this coalition. The have him In a leadership position." nation's Infrastructure needs to continue to grow year after year, The coalition will continue and that includes the nation's to document the nation's trans. school infrastructure," Mayor portation, water Infrastructure, Finkbeiner said. "We will continue and school construction needs, to point out the tremendous public but will also promote the public benefits we receive from our trans- benefits our infrastructure pro. portation systems, water infrastruc. vides and how much we as a ture, and other public facilities. nation depend upon our Infra- We will also demonstrate how structure system. "APWA's involve. vitally important it is that we Invest Carleton S. Finkbeiner, Mayor of ment in Rebuild gives us the chance In these areas now or risk chipping Toledo, Ohio, and Chairman of the to promote the substantial work of away at our economic prosperity and Rebuild America Coalition public works programs across the overall quality of life." country," King noted. "We encourage our APWA members to learn more Mayor Finkbeiner was first elect. Mayor Finkbeiner replaces for- about and participate in Rebuild's ed mayor of Toledo in November of met Philadelphia Mayor Edward G. activities." 1993 and re-elected to a second term Rendell who served as Rebuild's chair- in 1997. Prior to that, he served on man for two years. "Mayor Randall Additional Information on the Toledo's city council for eight years brought tremendous leadership and Rebuild America Coalition is available and as vice-mayor for two years. In vision to the coalition," said Peter B. at www.rebuildamerica.org or by his years of service, he has capitalized King, executive director of the American contacting Ann McCulloch at (202) on the clty's many resources and Public Works Association and spokeran 408-1325. 6 APWA Reporter MARCH 2O00 �bAreb Lf-TY-UL CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES tl 0 MIDYEAR CONFERENCE Hilton Palm Springs Resort -January 20-22,20W Thursdav,January 20,200 The midyear conference opened with registration beginning at 8:00 am. on Thursday,January 20. The morning session began with the Air, Land and Water Meetings. The Executive Board met from 12:00 to 1:30 p.m. for a Special Business Meeting. Thursday's afternoon session led off with presentations of the 1999 CASA Award Winning Projects. Public Service Award Winners: Small Agency Winner was Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency for "Big Bear Valley Endangered Species/Wetlands Enhancement Project" Large Agency Winner was Orange County Sanitation District for "Santa Ana River Watershed Protection Project" Innovation Award Winners: Small Agency Winner was Stege Sanitary District for "Video Inspection Enhancement and Predictive Failure Model". Large Agency Winner was Dublin San Ramon Services District for "Clean Water Revival Project" Paul Causey was moderator for a panel on "Legal Jeopardy-Personal Liability of Managers and Directors", which featured three keynote speakers;Jeff Willis, Esq.,of Burke, Williams, Sorensen,Mark Adelson, Chief of Surveillance and Enforcement-Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and Herbert G. Johnson, Senior Assistant U.S. Attorney,Northern California. The Federal Legislative Committee met at 4:00 pm. The first day concluded with the President's Reception hosted by the Hilton Palm Springs Resort from 6:00-7:00 p.m. Friday.January 21.2000 On Friday,registration continued. The morning began with the State Legislative Committee and the Associates Committee meetings held from 7:30—9:00 am. The Directors and Managers Meetings were held separately at 9:00 am. The Manager's program included a panel discussion of SB709, followed by a presentation on the Government Accounting Standards Statement 34,and ending with Consensus Reconunendations of the SSO Federal Advisory Committee. The Managers Meeting concluded with a discussion of issues of general interest. The Directors program included a panel discussion on the Brown Act, Conflicts of Interest and the FPPC Regulations. Attorney,David Schricker, gave a presentation on Directors Compensation. Mary Gordon of the Dublin San Ramon Services District, presented the"Compensation Surveys and Philosophy of Compensation Issues and Bob Beebe of the Dublin San Ramon Services District, presented"Pay for Performance"Incentives Compensation Plan for Senior Managers. The morning ended with a brainstorming discussion for future Directors Meetings. The Attorneys Committee met from Noon-4 :00 pm and the New Member Orientation was held from 11:30 am to Noon. After a poolside Luncheon,the Friday Session began with featured speakers, Author _ G. Baggett Jr.,member State Water Control Resources Control Board and Craig S. Johns, former Chair S.F. Regional Water Quality Control Board. Their presentation was titled Influencing Decision-Makers How to Make Your Case. After a short break,Bob Rauch, of Rauch Communications energized the delegates by giving an enlightening presentation on"Understanding Roles and Responsibilities of Managers and Directors". The Program Planning Meeting was held after the close of Friday's General Session. The Associates Recognition Reception ended the evening with all in attendance receiving a CASA lapel pin. SATURDAY,JANUARY 22,2000 The Executive Board met from 7:30- 8:55 am. President Steve Majoewsky called the General Session to order at 9:10 am. Roll Call —President Majoewsky proclaimed a quorum was present. Approval of Minutes--President Mojoewsky asked for additions or corrections to the minutes of the August 14,1999 General Session Meeting. It was moved to approve by Alfred Cabral,West County Wastewater District. The motion was carried. Mr. Aftab Dada, General Manager of the Hilton Palm Springs Resort was introduced to the General Session by President Majoewsky and recognized for hosting the President's Reception. On behalf of CASA,President Majoesky thanked Mr.Dada and his staff for their hard work in making the CASA Conference a success. - Associates Committee- Lora Stovall reported no action items. On behalf of the Associates Committee,Lora thanked everyone who attended the Associates Recognition Reception and hoped they all received their lapel pins. Attorney's Committee—Dave O'Hara reported 43 attorneys were in attendance Friday.No action items. Budeet&Audit Committee-No report. Federal Liaison & Legislative Committee -Eric Sapirstein reported the committee met Thursday to review prospects for congressional activity in the final session of Congress this year. The committee discussed the fact that no broad ranging legislation was likely to pass Congress this year. The congressional election cycle made overhaul of the Clean Water Act unlikely given the fact that Congress would not be receptive to tackling controversial issues that lack a consensus on how to rewrite the law. Instead, it appears that a targeted rewrite of the Clean Water Act's SRF funding and estuary protection provisions will occur. The committee was informed that it appears that House and Senate hearings into the TMDL development process are expected sometime later this year. It was also informed that the Senate and House clean water committees would probably markup legislation to grant 2 the State of California an MT13E waiver to protect surface and groundwater supplies within the next few weeks. Superf ind represents the other area of activity that the committee has dedicated time to over the past year. It was reported that the Superfund reauthorization legislation includes CASA's provisions to clarify that POTWs would not be held liable for Superfund cleanups in cases where a POTW acted only as a good Samaritan,for example,or was carrying out its wastewater treatment responsibilities properly. Given the fact that this year marks the final session of the 1061h Congress,the committee agrees to pursue a number of issues in the event that last minute congressional activities provided opportunities to secure legislative changes. The committee plans to initiate the following actions: I. Draft an interim TMDL limits amendment. 2. Support efforts to address the CSO/SSO funding needs. 3. Write letters of support to California delegations on behalf of a waiver of the Clean Air Act requiring use of MTBE that have been found to contaminate drinking&reclaimed water supplies. 4. Seek to testify before Congress on how TMDLs are being developed in California and CASA's recommendations to improve the process. 5. Heighten the knowledge of Members and their congressional staff on the issues surrounding the development and implementation of TMDLs to ensure CASA's goals and objectives. 6. Write in support of legislative initiatives that would expand the commitment of federal funding for wastewater and reclamation infrastructure needs in California. State Legislative Committee— Chair,Rich Luthy deferred to Mike Dillon's report. Manager's—Kamil Azoury reported the committee had a lively discussion on SB 709 and thanked the distinguished panel for their presentation. He urged CASA members to contact Bobbi Larson, Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs, if they have any questions. Director's -Georgean Vonheeder Leopold reported no action items. However,the Directors may try a round table format for a future meeting at the May or August conferences. Program Committee—Jean Mariani, requested that all complete the Conference Evaluation Forms,as they have become a valuable tool in formulating program interests. Public Relations—Chair, Joyce Gwidt, announced a record attendance for the January 2000 Mid-Year Conference. She reminded everyone the Spring Conference will be held at the Rancho Bernardo Inn, San Diego on May 4-6, 2000, Regulatory Committee—Bobbi Larson reported that each of the three technical subcommittees met during the conference. Each committee had a full agenda,and the report focuses on issues where CASA agencies may need to take some action. Air Subcommittee: Kevin Hadden presided over the Air issues meeting. The new POTW MACT standard will not require any actions of existing POTWs,though new and significantly 3 expanded facilities will be required to cover their processes. New RMP requirements,under S. 880,dealing with propane and digester gas,require POTWs subject to the Wile to hold a public meeting in February,2000 and certify to the FBI by June,2000 that the meeting was conducted. A representative of the South Coast Air Quality Management District discussed a new proposed rule that would require public agencies purchasing new or replacement vehicles to buy low-or no-emission vehicles. Land Subcommittee: Layne Baroldi presided over the Land Issues meeting,which included a presentation from Michael Rushton of Jones&Stokes regarding the EIR schedule. The Final EIR will be released to the public in March of 2000 with final SWRCB action on both the General Order and the EIR in May of 2000. Annual biosolids reports pursuant to 40 CFR Par 503 are due to EPA on February 19,2000. New dioxin ndes proposed by U.S. EPA should not pose compliance problems for California POTWs. Water Subcommittee: Chair, Wendell Kido presided over the Water Issues meeting. Jim Colston gave a report regarding the CASAlfrl-TAC comments on the proposed federal TMDL regulations. CASA will be preparing detailed comments on the Third Draft of the State Implementation Policy by the February 16,2000 deadline;the SWRCB will consider adoption of the policy at its March 2, 2000 meeting. Bobbi indicated that this is a very important regulation and that all CASA members that discharge into inland surface waters or enclosed bays and estuaries should have their technical staff carefully review the document. Finally, CASA members should be aware of a proposed change to the State Operator Certification regulations that will limit the amount of time an operator may spend on maintenance functions to 15 percent of work hours. Tri-Tac Activities—Bobbi Larson gave the Tri-TAC report on behalf of Vice Chair Sharon Green. She reported that the three Tri-TAC technical committees continue to meet monthly, and that Tri-TAC met jointly in Ontario on January 19,2000 with CASA and SCAP. Tri-TAC played a major role in the preparation of POTW comments on the TMDL regulations and the State Implementation Policy. Treasurer's Report—Secretary/Treasurer Paul Causey distributed copies of the Treasurer's Report for the period ending January 18,2000. This represented 50%of the fiscal year. Paul Causey noted two corrections to"Expenditures". Code 203 Legislative Advocate, contract should be $267,910. and Code 204 Legislative Advocate office should be$24,066. in"Actual Year To Date Dollars". Executive Board Report--President Steve Majoewsky,on behalf of CASA thanked Jay lames from Stege Sanitary District for all of his volunteer time and energy in creating the CASAWEB.org website. In the near future,CASA will explore the feasibility of having the day to day maintenance of the website managed at the CASA Office. The CASA Executive Board voted to return$37,500 from the Litigation Fund to SCAP. CASA has been ask to join the"Partnership for Sound Science In Environmental Policy"for the purpose of education regarding dioxins and good science to gather data and present it in lay terns to facilitate public understanding. CASA's participation in the "Partnership for Sound Science in Environmental Policy"will consist of Bobbi Larson,Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs,attending a monthly steering committee meeting of the Partnership. President Majoewsky reported that the Executive Board approved a membership contribution of$5,000.00 and that the CASA office will mail to the membership public information materials on the Partnership for Sound Science In Environmental Policy as they became available. 4 Executive Director's Report--Mike Dillon presented a written report,of which a copy was handed out with the agenda He discussed issues relating to the Governor's Water Quality Initiative,the Republican Spending Proposals, the Directors Compensation Legislation, SB 739(Solis)—Collective Bargaining Bill,the Capital Facilities Fees: change upon Public Agencies, the Mandatory Penalty Law, S WRCB AB 982 TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group,the Speakers Commission and the Commission on Reorganization for the 21"Century. He also acknowledged new CASA staff. President's Report—President Majoewsky awarded Dr. Joe Brown of the Cupertino Sanitary District,a plaque in recognition for over 40 years of dedicated service to CASA. He also announced the Executive Board had extended Honorary Membership to Chuck Carry of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and Larry Rugaard of the Stege Sanitary District,who will be retiring. Finn Halbo was also extended a CASA Honorary Membership,as he was the West Bay Sanitary District representative until November 1999. The meeting adjourned 9:50 a.m. 5 M/17/811 11:86 916-148-2196-Mrange County Sanitatio✓Xclnbim,ponild 802 MAR-17-00 FRI 11:04 P.02 — GOVF.RNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBER TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CO.. Page 1 of 1 AWL OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR A00:093 FOR 1NtMED4TF,j1FLEASE Match 16,2000 GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBER TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD SACRAMENTO--Governor Gray Davis today annou=d the appointment of Peter S.Silva as a member of the State Water Resources Control Board. Mr.Silva,47,of El Paso,Texas,is deputy general manager for the Border Environment Cooperation Commission in Ciudad Juarez,Mexico,a position he has held since 1997.From 1992 to 1997,he was deputy director of the Public Water Utility for the City of San Diego's Water Department.From 1987 to 1992,Mr.Silva was assistamt deputy director for the San Diego Clean Water Program.Be is a licensed California civil en&eer,a member of the American Water Works Associatinn,and a member of the American Society of Civil Enginar Mr.Silva earned a bachelor of science degree from California Polytechnic University,Pomona The State Water Resources Control Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources and assure their proper allocation and effective use.Mr.Silva will receive a salary of$109,799.This position inquires Senate wnfirmativa GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS • SACRANI MD,CALIFORNIA 95814 , (916)445.2841 hup://www.90vem0r.ca.90V/Slbriefing(pressrelums/a00D93316 html. 3/17/00 03/17/BB 11:07 916-448-21%+->lrange County Sanitation/BclntyreAnnald 003 MAR-17-00 FRI 11:04 P.03 GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEIvtBERS TO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONT.. Page 1 of2 AWL OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR A00:092 FORIN31FD7A rr RRLEM March 16,2000 GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBERS TO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS SACRAMENTO-Governor fhay Davis today announced the folio—S appointments to California Regional Water Quality Control%at&; Jason D.Liles to the North Coastal Region—Mr.Liles,33,ofHealdsbmg is currently serving as City Councilman for the City of Healdsburg,a position he has held since 1998.In 1993,he became owner and administrator of the Heart to Heart Medical Center in Santa Rosa.From 1987 to 1991,Mr. Liles served as legislative director for Congressman Douglas Bosco is Washington D.C.,handling issues before environmental,public works,and foreign affairs committees.He camed bachelor and master of arts degrees from Georgetown University. William R.Maascy to the North Coastal Region—Mr.Massey,56,of Forestville,is currently chair of the Social Science Department at Santa Rosa Junior College,a position he has held since 1998.He is also president of the board of directors for the Forestville Comity Water District,a position he has held since 1990.Mr.Massey was chairman for Region 1 of the Association of California Water Agencies from 1996 to 1998 and was vice chairman from 1994 to 1995.He is also a member of the Association of California Water Agency,Board of Directors,and a member of the Board of Directors of Joint Powers Insurance Authority.Mr.Massey earned a bachelor of arts degree from the University of Cafifomia,Berkeley and a master of arts degrcc from San Francisco State University. Irving Pickier to the Santa Ana Region -Mr.Fickler,78,of Anaheim,is currently president of the Orange County Water Board,a position he has held since 1996.During his tenure,he chnirW the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System and has been president of the board of directors for two years.Mr.Pickier was on the Water District Board of Directors from 1992 to 1994,serving as the Water issues Committee chairman.Mr.Pickier served more than 12 years as Councilman on the Anaheim City Cc mciL He earned an associate of arts degree from Los Angeles City College. CWerd C.Waldeck to the San Francisco Bay Region—Mr.Waldeck,41,of Mill Valley,has bran the president and owner of Waldeck's Office Supplies in San Francisco since 1981.He was elected to the Mill Valley City Council where he currently serves as Vim Mayor.As a small business owner, Mr.Waldeck has been active with the San Francisco and Mill Valley Chamber of Commerce.He earned a bachelor of arts degree from the University of California,Berkeley. http://www,govemor.cagov/s/briefinp)pucssmleascs/d00092316.htm1 3117/00 03/17/11H 11:07 911, 1 e-21%->Dramle County Sanitat ion/McIntyre,Donald 004 IIAR-17-00 FRI 11:04 P. 04 GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES MEMBERS TO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONT.. Page 2 of 2 Nancy S.Wright to the Colorado River Basin Region—Ms. Wright,49,of Whitewmer,has been self-employed for 23 years as co-owner of Pete Wright General Contractor.Shc has been instrumental in putting together programs and plans for the Mission Springs Water District since 1988. Ms.Wright is a founding member of the Desert Hot Springs Groundwater Guardian Team and has served as past president for the Desert Hot Springs Women's Club from 1997 to 1999. Since 1995,she bas been a member of the Groundwater Guardian Council for the Groundwater Fouorlaz on. Members of the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards have the task of protecting and enforcing the many uses of water,including the needs of industry,agriculture,municipal dstict%and the environment Members do not receive a salary.These positions require Senate confirmation. G011MWORGRAYDAVIS • SACRAMMrrO,CALIFORNIA 95914 • (916)445-2841 http://www.governor.caEov/s/ltriefino/mmsRl�rP�/9nnnmz t c t,....t �......- Date: April 13,2000 Orange County Sanitation District Odor Complaint Log PLANT N0. 1 2000 Nov ° Dec a° Jan Feb " Mar a$ Apr aL May 'a, $' Jul If AugIf Sep ae Oct I 1 t/15 no 12111 yes 1/6 no 3/21 n0 1225 no 3121 joplant related Total: 0 1 0 0 •— NT NO.2 -----------------------------------------_ _---. ---- PLANT N0.2 2000 Nov se Dec a, Jan a Feb s' Mar a, A r aV, may of Jun If Jul s$ Auga$ Se a" Oct a 11/13 no 1 1217 122 2/3 no 3/4 as 1 y13 no y10 es 1229 no y13 es y18 no plant slated y20 n0 Total: 0 0 0 2 1 Collection Systems 2000 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSep Oct 11/5 1 12114 113 218 3/2 11/8 1223 113 2/15 316 11/15 1228 1/6 228 3115 11/15 12128 1/10 11/15 125 11/15 1W 11/23 Coll.: Total 7 Total 4 Total 6 Total 3 Total 3 Total Total MT't' Total Total Total Total gAexcel.dtabm\Odor Complaint Log.xls T3oAo'fi L.4rir1>_ SCAPMONTHLY UPDATE SOUFHERN CAUFORNIA ALLME OF PUBUCLY OMM TREATMENT WOM April, 2000 A Message from the Executive Director... The swallows came back to San Juan Capistrano. Again. And while this is not necessarily news, for the first time I paused to reflect on the fact that I am a"day" kind of person. I really enjoy Swallows Day. I like the fact that every year we celebrate the timeless tradition and unerring accuracy of the small birds that make the 7,500 mile trip from Goya, Argentina to San Juan Capistrano; setting out on February W and arriving each year on March 19t. I like the parade, the food, the kids running around, the horses, all the people and especially, the faithful Tittle birds. There are other"days" I like too. It's not just because I'm a vet that I like Memorial Day and Veteran's Day, SEE YOU THERE! although perhaps I pause and see the unlined faces of a few young men that will always stay that way in my April 5-6 Joint SCAP/Urban memory. No, I kind of like it that for so many people these Water Institute Conference: days have come to mean the beginning of summer or a "Total Water Management" Four holiday in the middle of the week in early November. You Points Sheraton Hotel, Ventura see, I know that it's not that people don't care about the Harbor sacrifices made by those veterans—they do; they just June 3 Chuck Carry's understand that we live in a time of relative peace and Retirement Party: The Grand in prosperity and that life is for living. Those veterans won't Long Beach will be the setting for be forgotten, they are just part of the background, the this au revoir to Chuck. milieu, of America and are only called to the forefront when there is trouble. Air Quality Committee— Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 10:00 — And now we come to Earth Day. A new "day"to enjoy Noon, LACSD. and to recognize that we humans have a visceral Board of Directors Meeting — connection between the life-sustaining properties of the Thursday, May 16, 2000, 10 am — environment and the incredible beauty that sustains our 12 noon, LACSD soul. A"day" in which I must admit, I have had mixed feelings about for some time. Arguably, it was that first Earth Day, April 22, 1970, that started the modern environmental movement in America and led to the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Clean Water and Air Acts. We have seen a significant improvement in the quality of our water and air environments, but then we have spent billions and billions and billions of dollars to do so. And everyday, many of us work in obscurity and anonymity to ensure that those billions weren't spent in vain, and that the environment is able to sustain the burden of the 16 million souls that inhabit Southern California. And yet, I've often wondered why Earth Day holds no recognition for those of us that toil in a field in which the environment is such an integral part. No"Thank You Sewer Workers!" banners, no human interest stories in the newspapers, no TV crews down at the plant to film the men and women who brave W29D RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE 113 . SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO.CA 92675 . PHONE:(949)489-7676 . FAX:(949)469-0150 Monthly Update 2 April, 2000 insect-infested sewer pipes and confined spaces filled with toxic gases, work with hazardous chemicals, and generally work on a site that mirrors a combined petroleum refinery/biological weapons plant. No, more often than not, on Earth Day, we are just forgotten —or worse, we are perceived as the bad guy. But then I remember Memorial Day and Veteran's Day and I realize that it isn't that people don't care about what we do, they just take it for granted that we do it; after all we are paid to do it. But in my mind, I see the faces of operators who make unending rounds of their plants, taking readings, checking with their eyes and their hands the fitness of all of those things that instrumentation and electronics can never sense until they are broken. I see the lab personnel running endless process tests; I see maintenance personnel repacking endless pumps and listening for the faintest of vibrations from a thousand motors. And, while to some it may seem almost sacrilegious to those outside of our industry, on this Earth Day I will think about the men and women of the City of San Diego's Metro Wastewater Division. SCAP Director Alan Langworthy reports that in late February, the City experienced the situation that will probably befall all of our agencies at some time or another: a large raw sewage spill. Since that time they have been under a barrage of criticism, much of it coming as they voluntarily initiated frequent meetings with residents and environmental groups to update them on the status of repairs and long-term corrections. This break comes after the City has spent over$1 billion dollars during the !ate 90's on system improvements, including over $100 million at their Point Loma Treatment Plant. (Editor's Note: Alan will be providing more detailed information on their situation for the May Monthly Update). To the Metro Wastewater Team: The demoralizing effects of this situation must be affecting everyone there, and may seem to diminish the excellent things you do every day. But like the other professionals in our field, I know that you will continue to perform your jobs in an exceptional way, and because of your experience, others in our industry will learn and improve our reliability. On this Earth Day you have as much cause to celebrate your contributions to the health and well being of this Earth — and in particular the human inhabitants —as any other environmental organization. Finally, my hat is off to the Encina Wastewater Authority,which is sponsoring the Earth Day celebration in the Carlsbad area. On Thursday, April 20, they will open their treatment plant up for a day of energy and water conservation presentations,contests, games and activities. On Saturday, they are sponsoring a beach clean-up and providing t-shirts to the first 50 volunteers. General Manager Mike Hogan and Environmental Compliance Manager Nancy Anson are spearheading an effort that I hope will catch on with other POTWs. Earth Day events are happening all over the Southland —check out htto://www.earthdayla.org. Add another"day"to your life! La Terra es muy buena! Ray Miller Monthly Update 3 April, 2000 Air CARB Architectural Coatings Control Measures Draft EIR Released The California Air Resources Board is preparing a model Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for architectural coatings for local air pollution control districts that mimics —or in some cases is more stringent—than SCAQMD's Rule 1113. Architectural coatings include industrial maintenance coatings, waterproofing sealers, floor coatings, primers, bituminous roof coatings and flat and non-flat coatings. For industrial maintenance coatings, Rule 1113 provides a higher VOC limit(340 g/L) via a six-year exemption (until 2006) to essential public services (like wastewater/water agencies). The CARB proposal doesn't have essential public services provision, but requires these coatings to meet a 250 g/L limit by 2002, the same time that the non-essential services provisions of Rule 1113 take effect. The CARB is conducting a cost analysis of the proposed rule; however, they are only addressing the manufacturers' costs, not the cost to industry (including ours) for testing or the added maintenance costs if these products are significantly inferior to those coatings available today. A Draft Program Environmental Impact Report(Draft Program EIR) for the proposed SCM has been released for comments. The comment period for the Draft Program EIR began on February 22, 2000, and ends on April 7, 2000. The Draft Program EIR is available at the CARB website at: hftp://www.arb.ca.gov/arch/recent.htm. Status of Joint Coatings Testing Program The POTWs Coating Assessment Team has met several times to discuss testing protocols and to hear proposals from agencies having testing laboratories. After being apprised by Judy Wilson (City of Los Angeles) of the City's internal testing lab, the group heard about their capabilities at their March 13 meeting. The City's lab has performed laboratory and field coatings tests for over 30 years, has a staff of ten and has performed testing for all coatings currently applied at the Hyperion Treatment Plant. At this time, both MWD's lab and the City's lab are under consideration to perform the testing. At their March 28' meeting, the group firmed up testing protocols and will be picking which coatings they will test at their next meeting. The team is planning on making a full recommendation on proceeding with the testing program to the Board at the next Board meeting. SCAQMD Splits "Clean Fleet Initiative" Into Separate Rules Earlier this year, SCAQMD staff unveiled Proposed Rule 1190, Clean Fuel On-Road Vehicles for Government and Airport Operations. At the request of cities and counties, AQMD staff broke down the proposal into separate rules and outlined a schedule that provides time to tailor the requirements to individual fleet operations and is holding additional public workshops to receive input from fleet operators. When public fleet operators with 15 or more vehicles replace or purchase new vehicles, they must either be low-emission or alternative-fueled. ` Monthly Update 4 April, 2000 The six proposed rules are: Rule 1191 —Clean On-Road Light and Medium-Duty Public Fleet Vehicles Rule 1192 —Clean On-Road Transit Buses . Rule 1193 —Clean On-Road Residential and Commercial Refuse Collection Vehicles Rule 1194— Commercial Airport Ground Access Rule 1195— Clean On-Road School Buses Rule 1196— Clean On-Road Heavy-Duty Public Fleet Vehicle Rules 1191, 1192 and 1193 are available now at the air district's website: http://www.agmd.gov. A public hearing for Rule 1191 has been set for June 16. LACSD Wins WERF Odor Assessment Grant LACSD (with consultant CH2M Hill) will be conducting a two-year, two phased research program that will: ♦ Provide a working definition of odors ♦ Determine POTW odor sources ♦ List known odor compounds of concern ♦ Provide odor assessment approaches ♦ Provide modeling techniques for estimating odor emissions and odor dispersion A literature search will be conducted in the first year and a research agenda will be developed for second year studies. Included in the analysis will be an examination of successful odor control techniques used at industrial and agricultural sites. Greg Adams of LACSD and Jay Witherspoon of CH2M Hill are heading up this study and are looking for information developed by other agencies regarding this topic. Please contact Greg at (562) 699-7411, ex 2113 if you can help. Water Issues TMDL-Related Items From Water Chair Bob Ghirelii: Several federal TMDL bills were recently introduced that would deny EPA the authority to regulate nonpoint source pollution under the CWA. S. 2041 (Lincoln D-AR) would exempt silvicultural activities from NPDES permits for stormwater discharges. H.R. 3625 (Dickey R-AL) would exempt all nonpoint source runoff from silviculture and agriculture operations. These bills would effectively remove important sources of pollution from the balancing act that must occur when allocating pollutant loads to an impaired water body. The national debate on TMDLs is heating up and these bills are just another example of how sides are being drawn up: nonpoint sources vs. point sources. Should these bills become law, POTWs and other point sources would likely have to bear a larger share of the pollutant reduction burden. Monthly Update 5 April, 2000 AB 982 (Ducheny) — Signed by the Governor last September, this bill requires the SWRCB to convene an advisory group to assist in the evaluation of program structure and effectiveness as it relates to the implementation of the Section 303(d) requirements (TMDLs). This group has held two organizational meetings and appointed 12 discharger representatives and 12 environmental representatives: Bobbi Larson of CASA will be the POTW member and Vicki Conway of LACSD will be the alternate. A scientific advisory group will be appointed to review technical issues regarding the monitoring program. According to SWRC Board Member Mary Jane Forster, the Advisory Group will be asked to reassess or confirm the monitoring approaches that have been undertaken to determine 303(d) listings, and then to examine the state's approach to the TMDL process itself. This includes examining the state's development of the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Among other things the SWAMP will specify the management objectives for ambient monitoring, define monitoring strategies and indicators that address specific monitoring objectives, develop sampling designs, develop costs and schedules and develop a mechanism to fund the program. SCAP/CASA/Tri-TAC Submit Third Draft Comment Letter on California Toxics Rule The Third Draft of the Proposed Policy for Implementation of Toxics Standards for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries (Cal Toxics Rule) has SCAP, CASA and Tri-TAC submitting their most forthrightly worded comment letter to-date. The letter reflects the three associations' concern that the state has not addressed the key issues identified in the previous two letters, particularly those addressing the following: ♦ Allowing only five years to develop a site specific objective (monitor, develop the objective, amend the Basin Plan) and then comply with it(if necessary, facility upgrading). ♦ No consideration of dilution for any point source discharge. ♦ Setting effluent pollutant limits based upon ambient values, even though the pollutant is undetected in the effluent. ♦ A single sample result will trigger the requirement to prepare a Pollutant Minimization Program (PMP). Additionally, the three associations commented on the state's conclusion that the Rule will save dischargers $32 million annually. The state used only one POTW(Delta-Diablo Sanitation District) as representative of all POTW dischargers and failed to include the cost of monitoring for TCDD equivalents (estimated to be a minimum of$3.9 million annually). Reporting Short-Term Chlorine Residual Excursions Under SB 709 (Mandatory Minimum Penalties) The SWRCB has replied to Tri-TACs concern regarding the reporting of short-term chlorine residual excursions above NPDES permit limits. The Executive Director, Walt Petit, stated that his staff will look into the issue, but in the meantime, agencies experiencing this situation should attach a letter explaining why the apparent violation shouldn't be considered a violation subject to mandatory minimum penalties. Monthly Update 6 April, 2000 Stormwater Phase II Regulations—Final Rule EPA's Stormwater Phase II regulations (final rule Dec 1999) will regulate stormwater discharges from small communities (less than 100,000 people) and small construction sites (less than 5 acres). Small urban municipalities will be required to apply for NPDES permit coverage by March 2003 and carry out BMPs to reduce pollutant discharges in stormwater and improve water quality to the maximum extent practicable. Many of our urban SCAP members are probably already covered under the countywide municipal stormwater permits issued by the RWQCBs, but there may be some out there for whom this program will be a new requirement. Biosolids U.S. House Science Committee Holds Hearing on Biosolids On March 22, the House held a hearing entitled "Sludge Rule: Closed Minds or Open Debate?" This hearing was called to address concerns that EPA not only has ignored some scientific findings that have questioned the adequacy of the Part 503 regulations, but also that some agency employees have intimidated critics of the rule. Researchers from Cornell University and Michigan have raised concerns about ground-water leaching of sludge-bom contaminants and charged that EPA tried to discredit their science and ignore the issues raised. Representatives from the National Biosolids Management Partnership spoke in rebuttal and pointed out that the regulations have endured extensive research and have consistently been shown to be based on sound science. Significant discussion focused on allegations that an EPA senior scientist threatened or intimidated those opposed to the use of biosolids. A California dairy farmer who is opposed to biosolids use and who has been asked to speak at public events about concerns she has, presented letters from EPA officials that she took as threats against her dairy farm and herself. Also at the hearing, the inspector general (IG) for the Environmental Protection Agency reported to Congress that EPA does not"have an effective program"to ensure compliance with those requirements. The report states that EPA doesn't adequately review the annual reports, and rarely inspects land application sites or POTW facilities—undermining public confidence in whether the rules are being met. The IG also advised that EPA should do better risk assessment on the use of biosolids and to fund research that is independent and objective. Some committee members questioned whether the EPA Office of Water had a conflict of interest in both trying to promote the safe use and recycling of biosolids while also trying to regulate activities that could contaminate ground water and surface water. The EPA has 90 days to respond to the report (June 22). (Environment Reporter, Volume 31, Number 12). California Biosolids Legislation SB 1956 (Polanco) is a spot bill that encourages statewide oversight for land application and would limit cities and counties ability to enact biosolids legislation, which is more restrictive than the state's regulations. Monthly Update 6 April, 2000 Stormwater Phase II Regulations —Final Rule EPA's Stormwater Phase II regulations (final rule Dec 1999) will regulate stormwater discharges from small communities (less than 100,000 people) and small construction sites (less than 5 acres). Small urban municipalities will be required to apply for NPDES permit coverage by March 2003 and carry out BMPs to reduce pollutant discharges in stormwater and improve water quality to the maximum extent practicable. Many of our urban SCAP members are probably already covered under the countywide municipal stormwater permits issued by the RWQCBs, but there may be some out there for whom this program will be a new requirement. Biosolids U.S. House Science Committee Holds Hearing on Biosolids On March 22, the House held a hearing entitled "Sludge Rule: Closed Minds or Open Debate?" This hearing was called to address concerns that EPA not only has ignored some scientific findings that have questioned the adequacy of the Part 503 regulations, but also that some agency employees have intimidated critics of the rule. Researchers from Cornell University and Michigan have raised concerns about ground-water leaching of sludge-born contaminants and charged that EPA tried to discredit their science and ignore the issues raised. Representatives from the National Biosolids Management Partnership spoke in rebuttal and pointed out that the regulations have endured extensive research and have consistently been shown to be based on sound science. Significant discussion focused on allegations that an EPA senior scientist threatened or intimidated those opposed to the use of biosolids. A California dairy farmer who is opposed to biosolids use and who has been asked to speak at public events about concerns she has, presented letters from EPA officials that she took as threats against her dairy farm and herself. Also at the hearing, the inspector general (IG)for the Environmental Protection Agency reported to Congress that EPA does not "have an effective program" to ensure compliance with those requirements. The report states that EPA doesn't adequately review the annual reports, and rarely inspects land application sites or POTW facilities— undermining public confidence in whether the rules are being met. The IG also advised that EPA should do better risk assessment on the use of biosolids and to fund research that is independent and objective. Some committee members questioned whether the EPA Office of Water had a conflict of interest in both trying to promote the safe use and recycling of biosolids while also trying to regulate activities that could contaminate ground water and surface water. The EPA has 90 days to respond to the report (June 22). (Environment Reporter, Volume 31, Number 12). California Biosolids Leaislation SB 1956 (Polanco) is a spot bill that encourages statewide oversight for land application and would limit cities and counties ability to enact biosolids legislation, which is more restrictive than the state's regulations. Monthly Update 7 April, 2000 FHA/HUD May Limit Loan Eligibility if Home is Near Sludge Composting Site On September 10, 1999, the Federal Housing Administration/Housing and Urban Development department issued new guidelines stating that any home that is either within sight of a sewage sludge composting site, or that is impacted by noxious odors, may be ineligible for an FHA/HUD loan. Sludge Disposal Rates on the Rise? Impacted by rising fuel costs and limited disposal sites, PONY members are reporting that biosolids contractors are proposing sharp increases to existing contracted disposal prices. Agencies experiencing cost increases are encouraged to report this information to Anne Briggs, Biosolids Co-Chair, who is collecting this information (909-928-3777, ext. 6327). Non Sequitur I listen to critics because often they're a good source of information for what you have to do differently. - John Chambers President of Cisco Systems Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MARCH 22, 2000 ANITgT� 2 � Q � o � Fcr'yQ N ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting e 03/22/00 Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on March 22, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Jan Debay, Chair Tom Thomson X Peer Swan,Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd Paul Snow X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Lynn Daucher Roy Moore A I Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z Eckenrode Michael L. Maertzweiler X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Peter Green Dave Garofalo A John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly Pat McGuigan X Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Mike Spurgeon X Joy Neugebauer Margie L. Rice X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Greg Smith X Jerry Sigler Jack Mauller A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates Paul Walker X Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Lisa Tomko; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Ryal Wheeler, Terry Josway; Rich Caigin; Jim Herberg; Rob Thompson; Catherine Biele; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Nixon, General Counsel; Craig Farrington;Adana Schafer; Richard Comeille Minutes for Board Meeting 03/22/00 t Page 3 ' REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Debay reminded the Directors of the March 2e Groundwater Replenishment System Workshop that would be held at the District The workshop was designed to bring the Directors up to date on the progress and policy issues that will be facing the District's board in the future. Those Directors interested in attending the CASA Spring Conference, scheduled for May 0 through the a in the San Diego area, were requested to contact the General Manager. The Steering Committee allows five reservations, and if those committee members are unable to attend, other Directors are encouraged to participate. Chair Debay then announced that the Steering Committee would be holding an adjourned meeting on Monday, April 3, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss issues pertaining to the appointment of Blake Anderson as the General Manager. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the Orange County Engineering Council recently presented David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, with a Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award. The award is presented annually to those engineers who have significantly contributed to the engineering profession, their community and the environment. Mr. Ludwin was also conferred the title of"Fellow" by the Institute for the Advancement of Engineering for outstanding service to his organization and the engineering community. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, then presented awards to key staff members for their Y2K efforts: Terri Josway, Safety and Emergency Response Manager, Larry Kraemer, Senior Engineer—Operations and Maintenance; Rich Castillon, Information Technology Manager, and Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Nixon, General Counsel, reported that there was a correction necessary to Board Agenda Item 15 (c), which would require a two-thirds vote to add the corrected item to the agenda. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That Item No. 15(c) as corrected, be added to the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held February 23, 2000 is deemed approved, as corrected. Directors Kenneth Blake, Lynn Daucher, Tom Lutz, and Mark Murphy abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting 03/22/00 Page 4 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/00 02/29/00 Totals $5.249,497.97 $8,616,540.73 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file complaint for injunctive relief and damages, Norman Parsons v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 000000844, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Disbrict. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of Steering Committee, re the March 22,2000 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 23,2000 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jim Ferryman, Vice Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the March 1, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held March 1, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to 1) reallocate funds for the biosolids management contracts with Pima Gro, Bic,Gro, Tule Ranch and the Yakima Company, into one account; and 2) move funds from one contract to another, as deemed necessary, due to unanticipated changes in climate, regulations and contractor performance. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director North Eckenrode, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the March 2, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Constriction Committee Minutes for the meeting held March 2, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to RA 6"B" Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company, authorizing an addition of$19,957, Minutes for Board Meeting 03/22/00 r Page 5 increasing the total contract amount to $211,561; 2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 authorizing a deduction of$7,545, decreasing the total contract amount to a total contract amount of$204,016; and; 3)Accept RA 6"B° Street and Mitchell Avenue Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 7-28, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Mladen Grbavac Construction Company. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for the development for a Long-Term Sewer Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total budget of$3,479,000; 2) Establish a budget for the Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, for a total budget of$4,124,000; 3) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, for a total budget of$2,210,000;4) Establish a budget for the Rehabilitation of the "A° Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total budget of$2,248,000; 5)Approve a budget deduction of$12,061,000 for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation to Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for a total budget of$14,284,200; and 6)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc.to provide engineering services for the design and construction support for Contract Nos. 5-49, 5-50, 5-51, and 5-52 for an amount not to exceed$1,149,801. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the rehabilitation of the Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for a total amount not to exceed $175,261. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11- 22, for a total amount not to exceed$224,800. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for a total amount not to exceed $811,958. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to proceed with design of a new Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, to replace the Foster Pump Station. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Tom Saltarelli, Chair of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the March 8, 2000 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. Minutes for Board Meeting 03/22/00 Page 6 The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes forthe meeting held March 8, 2000 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to appoint Moreland&Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 1999.00 for an amount not to exceed $42,600, with an option of auditing the fiscal years 2000-01 and 2001-02 upon staff approval, and an option of auditing fiscal years 2002-03 and 2003-04 upon Board approval. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Peer Swan, a member of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. The Chair then ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 24, 2000, to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for the Project Development Phase of the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$172,649 for a total amount not to exceed$4,982,950. Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District have equal shares for the addendum in the amount of$86,324.50 and for the Professional Services Agreement in the total amount of$2,491,475. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve the plans and specifications for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 4)Award a contract to JW Contracting Corporation for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to exceed$10,428,440. 17. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, gave a presentation on Consolidation of Revenue Area Financial Plans and Rates, except Revenue Areas 7 and 14. Various alternatives were presented. Alternative No. Four is stairs recommendation, which will equalize all rates in fiscal year 2000/01. This Rem will be placed on the April 20h agenda for action. Minutes for Board Meeting 03/22/00 Page 7 CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in dosed session at 8:36 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. Agenda Item No. 18(a)(1) was not discussed. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(2). No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:47 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.J ! /s/ Secretary of the Eyard of Dir ors of Orange County Sanitation s 'ct \Vadon\daat Wp.d Vgenda\aoard Mirudm\2000 Board Mffi tmW32200.dw Claims Paid From 211/00 to 2116100 ` Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 25140 Voided Check $ - 25141 Computerized Facility Integration 252.003.57 Engineering Service J-25-1 25142 County of Orange 200,481.22 Construction 11-17-2 25143 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 31,715.00 Painting Maint Services MO 4-22-98 25144 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 88.620.04 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 25145 Municipal Water Dist of Orange County 33,457.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 25148 Parsons Engineering Science.Inc. 208.077.70 Engineering Services J42 25147 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 32.629.65 Consimction-Revenue Area No.7 Pipe Repairs 25148 South Coast Environmental Co. 91.630.00 Plant 2 Gen Gan Emissions Testing Service 25149 Southern California Gas Company 32.424.00 Natural Gas 25160 Voided Check - - 25151 Taylor-Dunn 31.580.67 Electric Cart Parts 25152 Tule Rench/Magan Farms 78.131.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25163 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 25,544.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Computer Programming 25154 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 704,250.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R 25155 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 477,508.19 Construction 3-38-1 25156 Union Bank of Calfromia 53,056.46 Construction 338-1 25157 Union Bank of California 78.250.00 Construction 3-35 25158 Colich Bros. Inc.,DBA Colich&Sons 311,600.00 Construction 11-17-1 Litigation Settlement f,. 25159 A-Plus Systems 2,289.36 Notices&Ads r1 25160 Great American Printing Co. 23214 Office Supplies yj 25161 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 1.000.00 Training Registration 26162 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies 25163 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 1.200.00 Human Resources Service 25164 American Industrial Supply,Inc. 509.98 Building Supplies 25165 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 25166 Appleone Employment Service 5.730.67 Temporary Employment Services 25167 Arcus Data Security,Inc. 106.80 Otfsite Back-Up Tape Storage 25168 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 552.00 Vacuum Truck Services 25169 Allantis Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 25170 Aztec Supply Company 8,332.00 Construction Maintenance Mezzanine 25171 ABBE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 2,355.00 Registration 25172 AT&T Wireless Services 3,725.32 Cellular Telephone Service 25173 AT&T Wireless Services 681.17 Cellular Telephone Supplies 25174 Battery Specialties 1,959.29 Batteries 25175 Best Towing Service 464.00 Towing Services 25176 Boyle Engineering Corporation 5,474.65 Engineering Services 3-38-1&7-7-1 25177 Brown&Caldwell 22,365.94 Engineering Service Pl37&P2-35-3 25178 Calif Centrifugal Pump 1,490.00 Pump Repair 25179 Carollo Engineers 937.12 Professional Service-User Fees Analysis 25180 Carollo Engineers 5.844.14 Engineering Services-J-59 25181 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 1,570.00 Engineering Servlces-Reclaimed Water Line Extension 25182 Charles P.Crowley Co. 24.24 Instrument Parts Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 211100 to 2115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25183 ClarkLift of California, Inc. 103.95 Forklift Rental 25184 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 231.34 Office Supplies 25185 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3.638.28 Electrical Supplies 25186 Contractors License Exam Center, Inc. 2,225.00 Training Registration 25187 Cooper Energy Services 438.27 Engine Supplies 26188 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 25189 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 8 MAP Training 25190 Corporate Express 652.58 Office Supplies 25191 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 50.84 Truck Parts 25192 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 819.76 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25193 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 134.20 Communication Service Agreement 25194 County of Orange 86.00 Permit Fees 25195 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4,926.97 Electrical Supplies 25196 CASA 11.000.00 Membership 25197 CDSMEDCO 129.15 Electrical Supplies 25190 CSMFO 2000 Annual Conference 135.00 Registration 25199 David Wood Associates, Inc. 1,19D.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 8 MAP Training 25200 Del Mar Analytical 1.188.00 Siosolids Analysis 25201 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 105.00 Paint Supplies 25202 DDB Engineering, Ina 9.256.50 Temporary Employment Services N, 25203 DGA Consultants,Inc 6.157.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 r* 25204 Ebemard Equipment 657.28 Tractor Repair >' 252D5 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 3.909.00 Medical Screening ry 25206 Electra-Bond 90.69 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25207 ENS Resources,Ina 4,156.93 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 25208 Faxpress,Inc. 134.15 Printing Service 25209 FedEx Corporation 9920 Air Freight 25210 Filter Supply Company 255.74 Filters 25211 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 1.995.24 Lab Supplies 25212 Foothill Engineering 8 Dewatering, Inc. 12.777.50 Bypass Pump System-Beach Closure 25213 Forkert Engineering 8 Surveying, Inc. 16.827.58 Engineering Services P-183 25214 Fountain Valley Camera 213.04 Photo Supplies 25215 Fred Pryor Seminars 3,000.00 Training Registration 25216 Fry's Electronics 2,423.82 Computer Supplies 25217 Full Spectrum Analytics,Inc. 420.00 Lab Instrument Service 25218 FM International, Inc. 17,414.26 Professional Services J-25-1 26219 Ganahl Lumber Company 370.75 LumbedHardmns 25220 George Yardley Co. 6.99 Lab Supplies 25221 Getinge Castle 487.00 Lab Supplies 25222 Gledich-Mitchell, Inc. 632.51 Bel,Fitter Press Supplies 25223 Goldenwest Window Service 25D.00 Wndow Cleaning Service 25224 WW Grainger, Inc. 215.31 Compressor Supplies 25225 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 78.69 Janitorial Supplies 25225 Hach Company 1,039.06 Lab Supplies Page 2 of 7 a Claims Paid From 211/00 to 2/15100 , Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26227 Heiman Fire Equipment, Inc. 3,682.43 Safety Equipment 25226 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 144.00 Catering Services 25229 Home Depot 2.188.63 Smell Hardware 25230 Hopkins Technical Products 1,272.04 Pump Supplies 25231 Hub Auto Supply 407.75 Truck Parts 25232 HI Standard Automotive 345.33 Automotive Supplies 25233 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,474.73 Printing Service 25234 Immigra ion&Naturalization Service 810.00 Filing Fees 25235 Industrial Motor&Control, Inc. 2,801.00 Instrument Supplies 25236 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 287.25 Lab Supplies 25237 International Time Recorder 305.00 Safety Supplies 25238 Interstate Battery Systems 186.25 Batteries 25239 Irvine Photo Graphics 23.56 Photographic Services 25240 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 25241 IBM Corporation 359.89 IBM AS/400 Upgrade 25242 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,582.57 Safety Supplies 25243 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 5.355.75 Instrument Supplies 25244 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 7,944.45 Misc.Constr.Sew,-Clean Junction Box, Install Safety Shower&Manhole Repair 25245 Jays Catering 8,419.15 Directors Meeting Expenses 25246 Jensen Instruments Co. 351.27 Instrument Supplies 25247 Jim's Suspension Service 111.72 Truck Repairs N 25248 Johnstone Supply 104.10 Electrical Supplies 7 25249 Karen Monaco&Associates 4,875.00 J.D.Edwards Service Agreement w 25260 Kensington Electronics 813.53 Electrical Supplies 25251 Ken Companles/ExecuProv, Inc. 375.00 Registration 25252 Knowledge Point 130.50 Software Maint 25253 Knoxmndusoial Distribution Group 2,337.29 Tools 25254 Line-X Protective Coatings 337.38 Vehicle Mainl. 25255 Gerald R.Jones 0,174.47 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 25258 Lorman Education Services 189.00 Registration 25257 Luccis 06.00 Meeting Expense 25258 Mamco International 835.33 Janitorial Supplies 25259 Mandic Motors 45.00 Towing Services 25260 MarVac Electronics 30.17 Instrument Supplies 25281 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 588.04 Tools 25262 McMurray-Stem 240.00 Office Supplies 25263 Mac Analytical System 10,076.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 25264 Medlin Controls Co. 1.697.77 Instrument Supplies 25265 Mesa Muller 308.69 Truck Supplies 25266 Mettler-Toledo 10.678.41 WlnBridge Standard Software Update 25267 Midway City Sanitary District 18,887.69 Construction J-73 Cooperative Prooect Program 25268 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 10,927.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25269 Mission Uniform Service 2,098.86 Uniform Rentals 25270 Motorola Communications&Electronics 21,800.63 Communication Equipment Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 211/00 to 2116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Deseriptlon 25271 N.Glantz&Son 53.88 Tools 25272 Neal Supply Co. 108.61 Plumbing Supplies 25273 Network Generations, Inc. 437.20 Computer Supplies 25274 Nicholas Chevrolet 154.29 Truck Repairs 25275 Nlnyo 6 Moore Corporate Accounting 7,147.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing M06-24-98 25276 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 25277 Office Depot Business Services Div. 367.91 Office Supplies 25278 Opto Software 1,800.00 Optio Form Implementation 25279 Orange County Sanitation Dlshict 126.81 Petty Cash Reimb. 25280 Oxygen Service Company 1,898.15 Specialty Gases 25281 OCB Reprographics 183,37 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25282 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 58.19 Electrical Supplies 25283 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,248.90 Plumbing Supplies 25284 Parkhouse Tire Co. 211.55 Tires 25285 Parts Unlimited 365.68 Truck Supplies 25286 Pennell Company 12,OOD.00 Construction-Plant 2 Warehouse Removal 25287 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,398.29 Lab Supplies 25288 Pennaseal 609.00 Lube Oil 25289 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 18.252.88 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25290 Pitney Bowes 355.04 Postage Machine Service Agreement 25291 Pool Supply of Orange County 832.61 Operating Supplies rt 25292 Primary Source 10,023.17 Office Furniture 25293 PSI 951.61 Hardware 25294 0 Air-Calb. Div.Pump Engineering 307.60 Air Compressor Repair 25295 GOB,LLC. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 25296 Rick Buck 456.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25287 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 566.81 Auto Repair 26298 George L. Robertson 325.42 Meeting/7raining Expense Reimb. 25299 Rulan B Tucker L.L.P. 203.25 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 25300 RMS Systems Inc. 339.00 Software Maint. 25301 RPM Electric Motors 1,875.25 Electric Motor Repair 25302 Santa Ana Electric Motors 540.91 Motor Repair 25303 Santa Fe Indushial Products, Inc. 122.48 Mechanical Supplies 25304 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,OOD.59 Specialty Gases 25305 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 1.935.75 Lab Repairs 253W Second-Sun 2,584.98 Light Fixtures 25307 Self-Insurance Plans 948.51 State Workers'Compensation User Funding s Fraud Assessment 25308 Sheen Megan 10D.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land 25309 Sheen Megan,Inc. 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land 25310 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 32.87 Tools 25311 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 5,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 25312 Sievers Instruments 320.00 Lab Supplies 25313 Society for HR Management 280.00 Notices&Ads 25314 Sperling Instruments, Inc. 4,566.54 Flowmeters Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 2/1/00 to 2115100 , Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25315 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton,L.P. 1,282.46 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25316 Summit Steel 2,128.05 Metal 25317 Sunset Ford 42.58 Truck Supplies 25318 Sunset Industrial Parts 290.53 Mechanical Supplies 25319 Thomas Gray A Assoc. 330.00 Biosolids Analysis 25320 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 993.43 Mechanical Supplies 25321 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,334.93 Elevator Maintenance 25322 Time Warner Communications 40A7 Cable Services 25323 Lisa L Tomko 50D.07 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimb. 25324 The Trans Company 5.474.09 Electrical Equipment Maint Service 8 Supplies 25325 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 381.23 Truck Supplies 25326 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 290.00 Lab Services 26327 Taksystems 3,975.00 Temporary Employment Services 25328 V BA Consulting Engineers 1,171.17 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 25329 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,945.95 Plumbing Supplies 25330 Veme's Plumbing 140.00 Plumbing Equipment Testing 25331 VCI Mechanical 690.00 Electrical Service 25332 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,742.00 Lab Supplies 25333 The Wackenhut Corporation 5.906.72 Security Guards 25334 Wayne Electric Co. 599.00 Electrcal Supplies r 25335 WEF-Registration Dept. 1,D80.00 Registration e 25336 Xerox Corporation 4,798.04 Copier Leases Y 25337 The Yakima Company 100.00 Option Agreement to Purchase Land kn 25338 Mladen Gmavac Construction Co. 864.00 Construction 7-28 25339 Marcus D. Dubois 363.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25340 Donald F.McIntyre 1,675.62 Meefing/Traming Expense Reimb. 25341 Edwin D.Ra0edge 474.80 Meeting/Fraining Expense Reimb. 25342 Efran G. Lucene 8 COMP USA 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 25343 Norma C-Leopando 1,342.55 Employee Computer Loan Program 25344 Orange County Sanitation District 678.12 Petty Cash Reimb. 26345 John W.Weingarden 1,414.85 Employee Computer Loan Program 25346 Barclays Bank PLC 90.667.39 COP Letter of Credit 25347 California Dept of Fish and Game 5.00 Publication 25348 Orange County Sanitation District 71,357.10 Workers Comp. Reimb. 25349 Orange County Sanitation District 409.224,92 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25350 Southern California Edison 72,169.91 Power 25351 American Chemical Society 845.00 Training Registration 25352 American Express 12.289.52 Purchasing Card Program 25353 American Management Association 149.00 Registration 25354 AMP Incorporated 1.485.00 Training Registration 25355 ASMS Conference 1,500,00 Training Registration 26356 ABBE American Sm.of Safety Engineers 495,00 Registration 25357 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 247.67 Valve Supplies 25358 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 2/1/00 to 2/16/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25359 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 25360 Leandre P. Catecutan 343A0 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25361 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25362 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 808.77 Plumbing Supplies 25363 Contractors License Exam Center, Inc. 1,485.00 Training Registration 25364 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210,00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25365 Employers Group 365.00 Registration 25M Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25367 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25368 Expertune 598.00 Software Maintenance 25369 ESRI Inc. 1,600.00 Training Registration 25370 Anne Made Feery 274.59 Meeling/Training Expense Reimb. 25371 Franchise Tax Board 76.76 Wage Garnishment 25372 Robert P.Ghirelli 757.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25373 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership 25374 GIB 200D 749.00 Registration 25375 Hassled Methods 2,680.00 Training Registration 3 Maint. Software 25376 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.345.14 Dues Deduction 25377 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,459.74 Safety Supplies 25378 ISA 120.00 Membership h 25379 Jobtrak 85.00 Notices 6 Ads rr 25380 Law Journal Press 65.78 Publication 0+ 26381 Lonnan Education Services 189.00 Registration a 25382 Chns Maher 33329 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 25383 Donald F.McIntyre 180.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25384 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 295.55 Tools 25385 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,013.69 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 253M Business Training 8 Development Services 99.00 Training Registration 25387 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 2,548.00 Training Registration 25388 OhmarWEGA Corp. 495.00 Registration 25389 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25390 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25391 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 306.98 Fittings 25392 OCFA 576.95 Dues Deduction 25393 MWDOC 30.00 Training Registration 26394 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25395 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25396 Peace Officers Council of CA 783.00 Dues Deduction 25397 Pryor Resources,Inc. 149.00 Training Registration 25398 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 577.63 Paint Supplies 25399 Schenck Trebel 1,700.00 Training Registration 25400 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 25401 SkIIIPath On-Site 199.00 On-Sfte Training 25402 State of California 126.25 Wage Garnishment Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 211100 to 2/15100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25403 Summit Steel 1,541.77 Metal 25404 SARBS-PDC 750.00 Training Registration 25405 SWOTF-Stonnwater Quality Task Force 10.00 Publication 25406 The Pittsburgh Conference 60.00 Registration 25407 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.992.33 Mechanical Supplies 25408 Robert C.Thompson 181.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25409 Mark A.Tomko 402.65 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimb. 25410 The Training Masters 695.00 Training Registration 25411 Trident Data Systems 1,600.00 Training Registration 25412 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 125.00 Registration 25413 WEF-Registration Dept. 450.00 Registration 25414 3 Com Corporation 3,300.00 Training Registration 25415 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,890,782.65 Payroll Disbursements 18120-18283 Employee Paychecks It 161,676.77 Biweekly Payroll 219/00 18284-18286 Employee Paychecks 722.79 Adjustments 46076-46523 Direct Deposit Statements 664,653.81 Biweekly Payroll 2/9100 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 827,053.37 r rt Wire Transfer Payments b Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 1 .WS.10 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 177,297.01 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 149,301.95 January Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Societe Generale 56,456.89 811/99-1/31/00 Standby Letter of Credit Payment on 1993 COP Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 531,651.95 Total Claims Paid 211100-2/1 6100 $ 5,249,497.97 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Wamant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Wamants 25416 Air Products&Chemicals $ 70,335.39 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 25417 Blue Cross of California 172,078A2 Medical Insurance Premium 25418 Carollo Engineers 47,321.55 Engineering Services J-254 25419 Commercial Resources Tax Group 250,000.00 Professional Service-User Fees Admin. 25420 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 42,576.36 5 Notebook Computers,9 HP Printers&5 Dell Monitors 25421 Delta Dental 41,663.17 Dental Insurance Plan 25422 DukeSolutions,Inc. 70,323.36 Natural Gas-Spec#170 25423 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium 25424 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 96,027.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 25425 Lee&Ro. Inc. 34,022.79 Engineering Consulting Services-P2 39&P247-1 25426 Orange County Water District 176,421.98 Consulting Services J-36 25427 Polydyne,Inc. 43.866.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 25428 Voided Check - - 25429 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 37,479.47 Construction 1`1-37 26430 Tule RanchlMagan Fans 69,73425 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25431 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 36,457.20 Construction 541-1 E1 25432 Fleming Engineering,Inc. 27,748.62 Construction 3-38-1 �j 25433 Margate Construction,Inc. 393,990.36 Construction P2-39 25434 S.S.Mechanical Carp 350,847.40 Construction P146-2&J-53 rrV 26435 Southern Contracting Company 97,632.00 Construction P2-47-1 &J-33-1 if 25436 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,742.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 25437 Aearo Company 348.00 Safety Supplies 25438 Airborne Express 133.90 Air Freight 25439 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 630.34 Manhole Frames&Covers 25440 Allina Medical Center 245.00 Employment Medical Services 25441 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Gr 1,200.00 Human Resources Service 25442 American Airlines 2,321.50 Travel Services 25443 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,066.72 Training Materials 26444 Appleone Employment Service 6,905.18 Temporary Employment Services 26445 Applied Industrial Technology 3,403.70 Electrical Parts&Supplies 25446 Aurora Data Systems 144.80 Software Maint.Agreement 25447 APEX Communications 1.300.00 Security Equipment Maint. 25448 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines Registration-Ignition Timing 25449 ASR Analysis 640.00 Vibration Analysis 7-7-1 25450 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 35.15 Telephone Service 25451 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,848.14 Long Distance Telephone Service 25452 AT&T Wireless Services 123.40 Cellular Telephone Service 25453 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 25454 Battery Specialties 735.40 Batteries 25455 Bauer Compressors 3,990.05 Tools&Supplies 25456 Black&Veatch L.L.P. 15,868.58 Engineering Services-Can Gen Operating Philosophy Study Page 1 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 25457 Bush&Associates,Inc. 2.382.00 Surveying Services NO 6-25-97 26458 California Urban Water Consent.Council 250.00 Membership 26459 Caltrol, Inc. 2.570.93 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 25460 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,058.68 Instrument Parts 25461 Compressor Components Of California 4.697.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25462 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 1.769.79 Computer Maint.Agreement 25463 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 302.78 Electrical Supplies 25464 Consolidated Reprographics 21.60 Printing Services 25465 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 109.98 Plumbing Supplies 25466 Converse Consultants 433.70 Consulting Services-3-38-3 25467 Core Laboratories, Inc. 500.00 Lab Testing 25468 Corporate Express 525.09 Office Supplies 25469 Cotelligent 2,047.60 Software Maint. 25470 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 374.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee 25471 County of Orange 285.50 Permit Fees 26472 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,978.68 Electrical Supplies 25473 Cytec Industries 12.836.65 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 25474 CEPA Company 1.121.44 Lab Equipment Maim.Service 25475 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 401.00 CCTV Inspection of Revenue Area 7 Sewers 26476 CWFA Annual Conference 295.00 Conference Registration 25477 David's Tree Service 650.00 Tree Maint.Service 25478 Del Mar Analytical 1,280.00 Biosolids Analysis N 25479 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 208.52 Paint Supplies 25480 DAE Instruments 320.75 Elecuic tl Supplies 25481 DGA Consultants, Inc. 5,112.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 26482 Eberhard Equipment 712.64 Tractor Repair 25483 Enchanter,Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25484 Enviro Enterprises 2,193.91 Engineering Service-Trickling Filters Evaluation 25485 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 1,469.68 Software 25486 Faxpress,Inc. 719.23 Office Supplies 26487 FedEx Corporation 168.68 Air Freight 26488 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 317.87 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26489 Filter Supply Company 432.87 Filters 25490 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 64.46 Lab Supplies 26491 Thomas M. Flanagan 567.94 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 25492 Flo-Systems,Inc. 133.52 Pump Supplies 26493 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,994.37 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 25494 Fountain Valley Camera 90.32 Photo Supplies 25495 Franklin Covey 59.91 Office Supplies 25498 Fry's Electronics 556.78 Computer Supplies 25497 Full Spectrum Analytic, Inc. 539.71 Lab Instrument Service 25498 City of Fullerton 111.30 Water Use Page 2 of 13 Claims Paid From?J16100 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25499 Genahl Lumber Company 168.46 Lumber/Hardware 25500 Ganaff-Callahan Company 4.844.77 Investment Advisor Service 25501 General Process Controls 3,449.03 Electrical Supplies 25502 GTE California 8,405.61 Telephone Services 25503 Getinge Castle 600.77 Lab Supplies 25504 Glerlich-Mitchell,Inc. 2,721.64 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 25505 Golden Bell Products 15,295.50 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 25508 VAN Grainger, Inc. 1,417.67 Compressor Supplies 25507 Greseby S.T.I. 5,688.68 Engine Supplies 25608 GE Multilin,Inc. 2,864.00 Consulting Services-Electrical Supplies 25509 Heaker Equipment Company 370.35 Truck Supplies 25510 Hach Company 93.37 Lab Supplies 25511 David P.Halverson 169.71 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimb. 25512 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 916.18 Plumbing Supplies 25513 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 192.70 Catering Services 25514 Hilti, Inc. 275.04 Tools 25515 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 2,250.00 Maint-Services-Sewer Cleaning 25516 The Holman Group 705.74 Employee Assistance Program Premium 25517 Home Depot 681.03 Small Hardware 25518 City of Huntington Beach 48.00 Water Use 25519 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,953.04 Printing Service 25520 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 414.95 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26621 StateNet 200.00 Online Service 25522 Information Resources 100.00 Human Resources Service 25523 Interim Personnel 2,219.18 Temporary Employment Service 25524 ISCO C/O MRC Technology 549.53 Lab Supplies 25525 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 298.82 Safety Supplies 25526 IN GrammTech, Ina 15,000.00 Software Maim.Agreement 25527 J&B Auto Parts 327.37 Auto Parts&Supplies 25528 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 378.75 Instrument Supplies 25529 James Martin 8 Co. 17.366.56 Software Maim.Agreement 25530 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-If 6 MSP Motor Removal 26531 Jay's Catering 210.11 Catering Services 26532 Jansen Instruments Co. 193.51 Instrument Supplies 25533 K.S.Dunbar 8 Associates 8,750.00 Engineering Services 241 25534 K.P.Undsbom, Inc. 1,370.134 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 25535 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 5,687.50 FIS Support Services 25536 Kelly Paper 416.23 Paper 25637 Knox 2,019.88 Tools 255M Lab Support 930.00 Temporary Employment Services 25539 Lexis-Nexis 68.27 Books&Publications 25540 Gerald R.Jones 4.505.15 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 Page 3 of 13 �. Claims Paid From 7J16100 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25541 Mine Safety Appliances 271.88 Electrical Supplies 25542 MarVac Electronics 10.52 Electrical Supplies 25543 MasTec Network Services 595.86 Communication Equipment Upgrade 25544 Donald F.McIntyre 297.67 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25545 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 319.75 Tools 25546 Mellon Trust 15.815.10 Investment Custodian Bank 25547 Mid-West Associates 43.10 Pump Supplies 25548 Mission Uniform Service 5,274.47 Uniform Rentals 25649 Moffatt 8 Nichol Engineers 5,230.94 Engineering Service 5-41-1 25550 MotoPhoto 48.22 Photographic Services 25551 Nasco 285.54 Instrument Supplies 25552 National Plant Services, Inc. 1,250.00 Vacuum Truck Services 25553 National Safety Council/Western Region 290.00 Registration 25554 Neal Supply Co. 3,168.15 Plumbing Supplies 25555 NetManage, Inc. 3,313.31 AS/400 Software Maint. 25556 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 17,630.22 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 25557 Network Solutions,lnc, 11,870.00 Engineering Services-Voice/Data Cable Upgrade ly 25658 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3.964.12 Office Supplies �`- 25559 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 318.21 Plumbing Supplies bG' 25580 Orange County Chapter-ISCEBS 25.00 Training Registration N 25661 Orange County Sanitation District 22.W Petty Cash Reimb. 25562 Oxygen Service Company 2.408.83 Specialty Gases 25563 OCS Reprographics 182.96 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25564 OCE-USA,Ina 678.90 Computer Equipment Maim. 25555 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 120.66 Electrical Supplies 25566 Pacific Bell 16.71 Telephone Services 25567 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 25568 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,281.94 Plumbing Supplies 25569 Parker Hannifin Corporation 46.62 Mechanical Supplies 25570 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 19,450.27 Engineering Services J42 25671 Peak Technologies 2,680.09 Lab Supplies 26572 Pernaseal 411.77 Luba Oil 25573 Pro Source Integrated Solutions 2,002.24 Temporary Employment Services 25574 Projects Partners 24.107.20 Temporary Employment Services 25575 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 2,030.48 Mechanical Supplies 25576 R.L.Abbott 8 Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 25577 Rain for Rent 2,798.15 Pump Rental 26578 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2.393.48 Trash Removal 25579 Reliastar 7,760.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 25580 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 177.88 Electrical Supplies 25581 Russelectric, Inc. 428.41 Electrical Supplies 25582 RMS Engineering 8 Design, Inc. 10,914.00 Engineering Services-2 Lunchrrmining Rooms Page 4 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116/00 to 2/29/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25583 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 871.68 Mechanical Supplies 25684 Schwing America, Inc. 5,377.77 Pump Supplies 25585 City of Seal Beach 342.70 Water Use 25586 Second-Sun 670.01 Light Fixtures 25587 ShowCase Corporation 2,993.75 Software Maint. 25588 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 558.64 Tools/Hardware 25689 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 25590 So.Cal. Gas Company 22,161.34 Natural Gas 25591 SofiCholce 1,477.2e Software 25592 Southern California Water CommiOee, Inc. 750.00 Membership 25593 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 260.00 Flowmeler Calibration 25594 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 671.40 Janitorial Supplies 25595 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 506.16 Office Supplies 25596 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 26597 Summit Steel 194.11 Metal 25598 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 25599 Sunset Industrial Parts 136.97 Mechanical Supplies 25600 SARBS-CWEA 20.00 Membership 25601 Teledyne Analytical 164.56 Instrument Parts 25602 The Foxboro Company 112.23 Instrument Supplies 25603 The Menlwood Corporation 2.500.39 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 25604 The Orange County Register 880.20 Notices&Ads 25005 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 286,49 Mechanical Supplies 25606 Daily Pilot 112.50 Notices 8 Ads 25607 Trade Service Corporation 2.068.15 Software Maint. 25608 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 1,024.65 Truck Supplies 25609 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 110.00 Lab Services 25810 7eksystems 2,400.00 Temporary Employment Services 25611 United Parcel Service 286.74 Parcel Services 25612 Unocal Corporation 48.36 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-3 25613 Valley Cities Supply Company 3.545.56 Plumbing Supplies 25614 Vector Resources 4,413.18 Voloe/Data Communication Services 25615 VemWs Plumbing 635.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 25816 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,312.62 Vision Service Premium 25617 Vortex Corp. 213.55 Door Repair 25618 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,258.90 Lab Supplies 25619 Weigh-Tronix, Inc. 732.66 Scale Repair 25620 Western Stales Chemical, Inc. 17,604.88 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 25621 Westnar International 325.11 Truck Supplies 26622 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 872.78 Instrument Supplies 25623 Witeg Scientific 1,646.42 Lab Supplies 26624 WCT Products,Inc. 586.68 Instrument Supplies Page 5 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26625 WS Atkins Water 19,500.00 Siosollds Testing Agreement 25628 Xerox Corporation 5,403.17 Copier Leases 25627 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 108.61 Office Supplies 25628 Yokogawa Corp.of America 191.93 Instrument Supplies 25629 CNA Trust 1,918.80 Construction 5h1-1 25630 Union Bank of California 3,083.19 Construction 3-38-1 25631 Coring Chaudhry and Best Buy 2,352.20 Employee Computer Loan Program 25632 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 195.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25633 Darrell Ennis and MASS Microsystems,Inc. 2,398.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 25634 Emilio Adston and Circuit City 2,589.28 Employee Computer Loan Program 25635 Orange County Sanitation District 219.78 Petty Cash Reimb. 25636 Mahin Telebi 1,216.54 Employee Computer Loan Program 25637 Orange County Sanitation District 408,375.15 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25838 Southern California Edison 45.422.21 Power 25639 South Coast AOMD 18.054.32 Emissions Fee-Plant No.2 25640 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 148.20 Instrument Supplies 25641 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 3 Portable Engines-Catalytic Conveners p} 25642 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 23.79 Telephone Service 26643 Court Order 479.00 Wage Garnishment 25644 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment H. 25645 Cleuglis Rhubarb 2,536.69 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25646 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment o, 25647 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 10,286.27 Computer Maim.Agreement 25648 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 128.28 Electrical Supplies 25649 CHMIA 30.00 Registration 25660 CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership 25661 Carla D.Dillon 350.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25652 DWG Associates 500.00 Professional Services-Plant Automation Project 25853 Court Order 741.60 Wage Garnishment 25654 Chris Kdebel/Fashion Fair Laundry 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25656 Ferguson-Allied Supply Division 5,921.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 25656 Thomas M.Flanagan 248.74 Meetingfrmining Expense Reimb. 25657 Fluke Electronics Corporation 628.00 Electrical Supplies 25658 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 25659 GTE Califomia 1,000.38 Telephone Services 25680 Ing Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 25661 Irvine Ranch Water District 53.22 Water Use 25662 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 13,508.76 Safety Supplies 25663 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 512.34 Safety Supplies 25664 Gregory R.Mathews 522.38 Meeting Expense Reimb. 25665 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,599.48 Tools 25666 Monster.Com 275.00 Notices&Ads Page 6 of 13 Claims Paid From 2/16/00 to 2/29100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25667 Multiquip 139.10 Pump Supplies 25668 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 1,014.00 Training Registration 25669 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 12.69 Lubdcant(Diesel Fuel 25670 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 74.19 Electrical Parts&Supplies 25671 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25672 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25673 Oxygen Service Company 254.90 Specialty Gases 25674 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction 25575 Pacific Bell 1.119.32 Telephone Services 25678 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25677 Parkhouse Tire Co. 665.59 Tires 25678 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25679 Peace Officers Council of CA 766.00 Dues Deduction 25680 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 43.31 Mechanical Supplies 25681 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 092.39 Tools 25682 Sheraton Newport Beach 12,000.00 Hunt. Bch. Issue Meeting Expense 25683 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2D8.16 Tools/Hardware 256114 South Coast AQMD 12.012.71 Emissions Fee-Plant No. 1 25685 State of California 141.09 Wage Garnishment 25686 United Way 432.60 Employee Contributions 25887 University of Washington 525.00 Training Registration 25M Water Education Foundation 115.00 Membership to 25689 Donald F. McIntyre 679.50 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimb. 25690 Michael D.Moore 180.83 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimb. 25691 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 105.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25692 RPI/Bio Gro 154.959.97 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 25693 Brown&Caldwell 437,417.60 Engineering Service P7-37 25694 Carollo Engineers 26,595.76 Engineering Service J-39 25695 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 103.661.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 25696 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 72.236.25 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 25697 Orange County Water District 30.925.92 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 26698 Pacific Investment Management Co. 111,011.00 Investment Management Service Res. 95-97 25699 Painewebber Incorporated 59.521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 25700 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 246.299.33 Engineering Services J♦2 25701 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 390,548.74 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 25702 Projects Partners 31,692.10 Temporary Employment Services 25703 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 34,701.30 Contract Services-Sewer Cleaning 25704 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72,958.61 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 25705 SPEC Services,Inc. 76.602.65 Engineering Services J-33-1 25706 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 59,539.89 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 25707 Woodruff,Spmdlin&Smart 81,106.91 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 25708 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 1,248,300.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R Page 7 of 13 Claims Paid From 2/16/00 to 2/29100 warmrtt No. Vendor Amount Description 25709 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 416,981.72 Construction 3-38-1 25710 KPRS Construction Services,Inc. 28,347.05 Construction P2-65 25711 Union Bank of California 46,331.30 Construction 3.38.1 25712 Union Bank of California 138,700.00 Construction 3-35 25713 Union Bank of California 121,546.07 Construction Pi-46-2 8 J-53 25714 Adamson Industries 1,753.31 Lab Supplies 25715 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 4,235.00 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 25716 Aearo Company 4W-00 Safety Supplies 25717 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 330.80 Lab Supplies 25718 Air Cold Supply 70.16 Air Conditioner Repairs 26719 Air Products&Chemicals 6.82 Lab Supplies 25720 Airborne Express 117.00 Air Freight 25721 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 885.00 Service Agreement-Peat Control 25722 Appleone Employment Service 11.054.97 Temporary Employment Services 25723 Applied Industrial Technology 1.478.59 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 25724 Anus Data Security 186.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 25726 Asbury Environmental Services 82.60 Waste Oil Removal {{{yyy 25728 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea 2424 Plaques 25727 Voided Check - - 25728 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 380.99 Telephone Service rHi 25728 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 183.01 Telephone Service 25730 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,152.28 Long Distance Telephone Service m 25731 AT 8 T Wireless Services 4,140.36 Cellular Telephone Service 26732 Bailey,Fisher 8 Porter 432.21 Electrical Supplies 25733 Battery Specialties 145.46 Batteries 25734 Bentley Systems,Inc. 5,387.50 Software Maintenance Agreement 26735 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,566.96 Engineering Services 3-38-1 8 6-13 25736 Bureau Of Business Practice 158.95 Publication 25737 Bush 8 Associates, Inc. 7,276.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 25738 BNI Building News 1.089.43 Publication 25739 C&H Distributions, Inc. 233.10 Tool Cabinet 25740 Cal-Glass,Inc. 140.08 Lab Equipment Service 25741 Calif Centrifugal Pump 7,376.21 Pump Supplies 25742 Southern California Marine Institute 7,245.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 25743 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 4,568.61 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 25744 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg, 16.16 Office Supplies 25745 Compressor Components Of California 14,548.26 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 25746 Compu Master 895.00 Registration 25747 Computers America, Inc. 272.79 Computer Supplies 25748 Connell GM Parts 245.67 Truck Supplies 25749 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1.576.31 Electrical Supplies 25750 Consolidated Freighhvays 602.15 Freight Page 8 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warted No. Vendor Amount Description 25751 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 748.71 Plumbing Supplies 25752 Controloo 177.02 Electrical Supplies 25753 Converse Consultants 5.274.48 Consulting Services-P2-60&J-33A 25754 Cooper Energy Services 9,378.46 Engine Supplies 25755 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5,000.00 Consulting Services-EMT Retreat 25756 Corporate Express 358.49 Office Supplies 25757 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 12.110.00 Custodial Services Spec. No. 989M9 25758 Cost Containment Solutions 2,86720 Worker's Comp.Services 25759 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 405.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 25750 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 70.00 Underground Storage Health Service Fee 25761 Cydus Envirosystems, Inc. 11.928.16 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 25762 CA Emissions Program 17.70 Emissions Testing Program 25783 CASA 260.00 Conference Registration 26764 CEPA Company 616.25 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 25766 CHEMeuics, Inc. 94.17 Lab Supplies 25756 CH2MHig 4,886.75 Engineering Services-Microfiltration Demonstration Project 25767 CR&R, Inc. 1,260.00 Container Rentals 25768 CWEA Annual Conference 1,945.00 Conference Registration 21. 257e9 CWEA Membership 160.00 Membership FF 25770 David's Tree Service 150.00 Tree Maint.Service A 25771 Del Mar Analytical 585.00 Biosolids Analysis 25772 Della Packaging Products, Inc. 165.76 Lab Supplies 25773 Diamond H Recognition 42.79 Employee Service Awards No 25774 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 362.88 Paint Supplies 25775 DOB Engineering, Inc. 22,228.00 Temporary Employment Services 25776 DGA Consultants,Inc. 2,808.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 25777 Electra-Bond 2,2D0.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 25778 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 25779 Enterprise Technology Services, L.L.C. 11.849.62 Consulting Services-FIS Support 25780 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 943.70 Lab Supplies 25781 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 8,864.78 Professional Services J40-4 25782 Equipment Life Technology 287.64 Mechanical Supplies 25783 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,013.27 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 25784 Faxpress, Inc. 3,313.27 Office Supplies 25786 FedEx Corporation 74.15 Air Freight 25786 Filter Supply Company 806.92 Fibers 25787 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.25 Orange County Property Information Subscription 25788 First Metro Appraisals 1,875.00 Selloke Easement Appraisal 25789 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 601.05 Lab Supplies 2579D Flo-Systems,Inc. 14,324.65 Pump Supplies 25791 Fountain Valley Camera 51.36 Photo Supplies 25792 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 242.00 Truk Wash Tickets Page 9 of 13 Claims Paid From 2/16I00 to 2/29100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25793 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 1,629.49 Paint Supplies 25794 Fred Pryor Seminars 89.00 Training Registration 25795 Fry's Electronics 1,180.25 Computer Supplies 25796 General Electric Supply Company 5,487.17 Electric Parts 25797 Ganahl Lumber Company 1,656.48 Lumber/Hardware 25798 Callan Associates, Inc. 1,440.08 Investment Advisor Service 25799 Gates Fiberglass Installers 3,564.82 Fiberglass Repair 25800 GTE California 93.58 Telephone Services 25801 George Yardley Co. 515.63 Lab Supplies 26802 Gibson, Dunn&Crutcher,L.L.P. 7,200.00 Legal Services -Burge Claim 25803 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 23.526.36 Belt, Filter Press Supplies 25804 Governing 15.00 Publication 25805 Government Finance Officers Association 410.00 Membership 26808 W W Grainger, Inc. 3.630.72 Compressor Supplies 25807 Graseby S.T.I. 785.44 Engine Supplies 25808 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 1,181.75 Janitorial Supplies 25809 GBC(General Binding Corp) 633.03 Printing Service 25810 Edwards Systems Technology 2,125.00 Safety Service Agrement 25811 Harold Primrose Ice 112.00 Ice For Samples 25812 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 908.99 Plumbing Supplies 25813 Heiman Fire Equipment,Inc. 6,132.03 Safety Equipment 25814 Herb's Blacirforest Bakery 8 Deli 673.08 Catering Services mr 25815 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1,020.76 Compressor Parts 0 25816 Home Depot 857.21 Small Hardware 26817 Hopkins Technical Products 421.06 Pump Supplies 25818 Hub Auto Supply 301.69 Truck Parts 26819 City of Huntington Beach 14,451.57 Water Use 25820 Hunts'Final Phase 3,636.83 Misc.Construction Services-Admin. Bldg.Acoustic Modifn. 25821 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,163.70 Printing Service 25822 Industrial Air Compressor 2,590.83 Air Compressor 25823 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 915.74 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 26824 StateNet 200.00 Online Service 25825 Interim Personnel 688.15 Temporary Employment Service 26826 Interstate Battery Systems 242.17 Batteries 25827 Irvine Photo Graphics 15.13 Photographic Services 25828 IBM Corp. 6,075.37 IBM AS1400 Lease 25829 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 171.40 Safety Supplies 25830 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 734.10 Instrument Supplies 25831 Jay's Catering 1.766.28 Catering Services 25832 Jim's Suspension Service 35.00 Truck Repairs 25833 Johnstone Supply 463.26 Electrical Supplies 25834 JLM Contracting 259.73 Construction Service-Pipe Repair Page 10 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 26835 K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 4,290.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 25836 Karen Monaco&Associates 6.437.50 FIS Support Services 25837 Knox 7,873.95 Tools 25838 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 79.61 Safety Supplies 25839 Lab Support 2,522.62 Temporary Employment Services 25840 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 6,112.52 Engineering Service-Plant No. 1 Dust Collection System 25841 Lexls-Nexis 6.27 Books 8 Publications 25842 Liebert Cassidy 1,695.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 26843 Gerald R.Jones 4,487.95 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 25844 Lucci's 100,00 Meeting Expense 25846 Maintenance Products, Inc 3,066.87 Mechanical Supplies 25846 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 212.58 Tools 25847 Mc Welce Rack-N-Box Company 1,020.66 Boxes 25848 Mec Analytical System 750.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Testing 25849 Medlin Controls Co. 600.39 Instrument Supplies 25850 Mesa Muffler 280.12 Truck Supplies 25851 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 3,737.71 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25152 Miller Equipment Co. 574.99 Pump Repair 26863 Mission Uniform Service 3.697.31 Uniform Rentals 25854 Mitchell Repair Informallon Co. 188.87 Publications 25855 Monarch Instrument 11,335.91 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25856 Monitor Labs, Inc. 978.93 Instrument Maint. 26857 Monterey Mechanical Co. 10.00 Mailing Fee Refund 25858 Moody's Invesloea Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 25859 Neal Supply Co. 385.20 Plumbing Supplies 25860 New Pig 1,225.94 Split Absorbent Materials 25861 City of Newport Beach 56.35 Water Use 25862 Nlckey Petroleum Co., Inc. 13,128.17 Lubricant/Dlesel Fuel 25863 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 9,028.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 25864 NAS Associates,Inc. 1,597.35 Lab Services 26865 Northwestern Carbon 2.761.87 Filters 25866 Nuclear Source and Services(NSSI) 516.00 Lab Services 25867 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,736.80 Office Supplies 25868 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment, Inc. 1,129.45 Grease Pump 25869 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 159.18 Plumbing Supplies 25870 Orange County Forum 35.00 Registration 25871 Orange County Sanitation District 90.00 Petty Cash Relmb. 25872 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1,339.07 Fittings 25873 Oxygen Service Company 1,887.80 Specialty Gases 25874 OC8 Reprographics 4,953.78 Printing Service-Spec P-173 25875 Pacific Bell 34.52 Telephone Services 25876 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,765.62 Plumbing Supplies Page 11 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 , Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25877 Pagenet 2,195.03 Paging Services 25878 Palmieri,Tyler,Wiener,W Ihelm 8 Waldron 546.00 Legal Service-Sakioka Easement,Contract 7-1 E 25879 Parts Unlimited 725.45 Truck Supplies 25880 Patriot Video Productions 390.83 Video Taping Services 25881 Polydyne,Inc. 12,923.20 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 25882 Power Design 3,356.41 Electrical Supplies 25883 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,D83.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 25884 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 437.54 Mechanical Supplies 25885 Pump Engineering Wor O-Air 1,988.45 Pump Supplies 25886 OOS,L.L.C. 258.62 Investment Management Program Service 25887 Red W ng Shoes 164.64 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 25888 R.A. Reed Electric 5,339.41 Motor Overhaul 25889 Rick Arbour&Associates 3,108.43 Consulting Service-O 8 M Worker Competency 8 Training Project 25890 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 568.52 Auto Repair 26891 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 995.00 Engineering Service-Laboratory Seismic Evaluation 25892 RPM Electric Motors 4,908.01 Reliance Motor 8 Pump 25893 RPS Industries 1,148.97 Electrical Supplies 25894 Safety-Wean 5,526.50 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 25885 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 4.22 Mechanical Supplies 25896 Schwing America, Inc. 1,282.00 Pump Supplies H. 25897 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 123.64 Specialty Gases 25898 Second-Sun 861.56 Light Fixtures 25899 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,522.25 Tools/Hardware 25900 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 2,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group Transfer 25901 Sievers Instruments 460.00 Lab Supplies 25902 Solder Station One Inc.-West 474.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 25903 South Coast Environmental Co. 7,609.17 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 25904 Southern California Edison 16.10 Power 25905 Southern California Water 67.49 Water Use 25906 Sparkleds 1.863.78 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 25907 Standard&Poore 1.000.00 Analytical Services 25908 Statoil Energy Power/Paxton, L.P. 635.45 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25909 Successimes, Inc. 341.44 Pictures for New Plant 2 Maim. Bldg. 25910 Summit Steel 379.46 Metal 25911 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.00 Landscape Maint. 25912 Sunset Ford 385.84 Truck Supplies 25913 SARBS-PDC 2,000.00 Training Registration 25914 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1,079.91 Electric Cart Parts 25915 Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. 264.90 Publication 25916 Teledyne Analytical 75.00 Instrument Parts 25917 The Foxboro Company 1,733.72 Instrument Supplies 25918 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,741.12 Mechanical Supplies Page 12 of 13 Claims Paid From 2116100 to 2129100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25919 Time Motion Tools 57.03 Tools 25920 Transcat 751.95 Electrical Supplies 25921 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 329.44 Truck Supplies 25922 Teksysiems 4,180.30 Temporary Employment Services 25923 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement 25924 Ultra Scientific 130.94 Lab Supplies 25925 Undersea Graphics Inc. 19,250.00 Contract Service-Outlet Inspection 25926 United Parcel Service 629.82 Parcel Services 25927 V&A Consulting Engineers 10,372.90 Engineering Services-Evaluating H2S Odor Treatment for Collection 25928 Valley Cities Supply Company 10.99 Plumbing Supplies 25929 Veme's Plumbing 290.00 Plumbing Equipment Repair 25930 Vortex Industries. Inc. 104.00 Door Repair 25931 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,963.89 Lab Supplies 25932 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,277.37 Security Guards 25933 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 236.03 Electrical Supplies 25934 Western States Chemical, Inc. 18,9W.89 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 25935 Xerox Corporation 15,213.71 Copier Leases 25936 Matthew And Stewart Co., Inc. 8.813.00 Construction 11-23 25937 Systems Integrated 16.410.40 Construction Services J-31-3 25938 American Management Association 159.00 Registration rr 25939 Tend L.Josway 102.38 Office Supplies Reimb. t`e 25940 Donald F.McIntyre 100.77 Cellular Expense Reimb. 25941 Robert Dolan 624.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. r" 25942 George L. Robertson 184.98 Meeting/1-raining Expense Reimb. 25943 Gary G.Streed 485.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 25944 Ernest N.Veboah 819.17 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimb. 25945 Albert E. Simpson 8 Willow Data Systems 1.895.11 Employee Computer Loan Program 25946 Albert E.Simpson 8 Micro Center 330.31 Employee Computer Loan Program 25947 Orange County Sanitation District 352.68 Petty Cash Reimb. 25948 Thomas E. Gaworski 3 MASS Microsystems 2,714.33 Employee Computer Loan Program 25949 Wanda Hagerty&Gateway,Inc. 2,989.74 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,776,474.19 Payroll Disbursements 18287-18411 Employee Paychecks $ 162,862.07 Biweekly Payroll 2/23100 46524-46968 Direct Deposit Statements 677.214A7 Biweekly Payroll 2123/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 840,068.54 Total Claims Paid 2/16100-2129100 $ 8,616,540.73 Page 13 of 13 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetmg Date I To BA.of Dir. 9/24 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number ' Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A mmoe.mnw m.vnvaannno.vaissry...pw eon qg„i� y�ya Page 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 3/1/00 -- 3/15/00 & 3/16/00 — 3/31/00. BA \YeEmVe l%1 p ftQ2P y kY FIIESNamapad.Cx Re,,W enmva Page 2 Claims Paid From 3111100 to 3115100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 25950 Court Omer $ 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25951 Court Omer 581,00 Wage Garnishment 25952 Duthie Power Services 81.691.74 Generator Supplies 25953 Orange County Sanitation District 420,253.14 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 25954 Oil 5th Partial Consent Decree Escrow Account 95,799.00 Operating Industries,Inc landfill,Superfund Site Settlement 25955 Southern California Edison 60,081.25 Power 25956 Allied Packing 8 Rubber,Inc. 167.72 Mechanical Supplies 25957 American Airlines 7.579.07 Travel Services 25958 American Express 12,523.62 Purchasing Cam Program 25959 ARK Technologies 5,288.00 Data Processing 25960 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 12.03 Telephone Service 25961 Court Omer 479.00 Wage Garnishment 25962 Court Omer 200.00 Wage Garnishment 25963 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 25964 Compu Master 895.00 Registration 25965 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 502.23 Plumbing Supplies 25986 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 225.00 Sewer Service Face Admin. 25967 CWEA Annual Conference 2D0.00 Conference Registration 25968 D.R.MCNatly 8 Associates 2.190.00 Registration-Software Training 25969 The Delphi Group 1.9130.00 Registration 25970 Employment Development Dept. 4,251.92 Reimbursable Unemployment Costs 25971 Court Omer 741.50 Wage Garnishment 25972 ESRI,Inc 800.00 Training Registration 25973 Friend of the Court 299.50 Wage Garnishment 25974 Ganahl Lumber Company 165.83 Lumber/Hardware 25975 GTE California 2,203.98 Telephone Services 25976 Hach Company 351.53 Chemicals 25977 Industrial Metal Supply 1,321.09 Metal 25978 Industrial Plastic Supply, Inc 693.88 Plastic Window for Scrubbers 25979 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 88.17 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 25980 Intl Union of Oper Erg AFL-CIO Local 501 1,359A5 Dues Deduction 25981 ICOM America,Inc. 92.15 Lab Supplies 25982 Aigas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 2,739.30 Safety Supplies 25983 J.D. Edwards 400.00 FIS 1099 Processing Training 25984 League of Ca.Cities,Orange County Div. 40.00 Meeting Expense 25985 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 3,381.95 Tools 25986 New Horizons Computer Looming Center 5,915.00 Training Registration 25987 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 6.445.97 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 25988 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment 25989 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 25990 OCEA 686.20 Dues Deduction 26991 Court Omer 40.00 Wage Garnishment 25992 Court Omer 296.00 Wage Garnishment 25993 Peace Officers Council of CA 765.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 3MI00 to 3I75I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 25994 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 156,55 Paint Supplies 25995 So.Cal.Gas Company 7,424.39 Natural Gas 25996 SofMm Computer Products 1,044.21 Computer Supplies 25997 SoftCholce 2,753.32 Software 25998 Southern California Air Cond.Dist. 60.22 Electrical Supplies 25999 Southern California Academy of Sciences 90.00 Registration 26000 State of California 149.82 Wage Garnishment 260DI Summit Steel 620.33 Metal 26002 Mark A.Tomko 253.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26003 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 26004 Nicholas J.Amontes 237.18 Meefingff-raining Expense Reimb. 260D5 Bradley H.Cagle 1.566.39 Copying/Duplicating Expense Reimb. 260D6 Andrei Ivan 255.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 260D7 Terri L.Josway 528.05 Meating/Tralning Expense Reimb. 26WO Julie A. Matsumoto 357.44 MeetingrTreming Expense Reimb. 26009 Michael D.White 408.47 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 26010 In-N-Out 6DD.00 Catering Services-V2K Celebration 25011 U.S.Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 26012 RPI/Bio Gro 112,068.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 26013 Blue Cross of California 172,208.64 Medical Insurance Premium 26014 Calif Centrifugal Pump 34,W6.62 Pump Supplies 26015 City of Newport Beach 247,359.75 Construction Reimbursement Agreement 541 26016 City of Santa Ana 30.916.00 Connection Fee Refund 26017 Computerized Facility Integration 174,689.90 Engineering Service J-25-1 26018 Forkert Engineering It Surveying,Inc. 32,577.28 Engineering Services P-183 26019 K S.Dunbar&Associates 26,375.00 Engineering Services 241 26020 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,255.35 Medical Insurance Premium 26021 Kemkon Pacific,Inc. 37,644.81 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 26022 Mec Analytical System 41,830.Bo Professional Services-Hunt. Beech Closure 26023 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 27,202.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 26024 Nat West Markets 64.207.57 COP Letter of Credit Fees 26025 Pro Logls Trust 50,899.00 Connection Fee Refund 26026 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 258,903.04 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94 26027 Tula Ranch/Magan Fames 66,171.01 Residuals Removal MO3-2945 26028 Woodruff,Spmdfin&Smart 44,432.90 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 20029 Ark Construction Company 198,686.00 Construction P144-4 26030 Margate Constriction,Ina 650,447.64 Construction P2-39 26031 R.Fox Construction,Ina 37,674.W Construction P2-61 26032 S.S.Mechanical Corp 228,782.W Construction P148-2&J-53 26033 Southern Contracting Company 84,522.00 Construction P247-1&J-33.1 26034 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 148,109.20 Construction 7-7-1 26035 Union Bank of California 25,420.31 Construction P146-2&J-53 26036 A-Plus Systems 5,302.45 Notices&Ads 26031 Alr Cold Supply 44.32 Air Conditioner Supplies 20WO Airborne Express 202.12 Air Freight Page 2 of ®� �1 " Clslme Pold From 3/1/00 to 3116100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26039 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 2,800.00 Human Resources Service 2SWD Analytical Products Group, Inc. 712.00 Lab Supplies 28041 Appleone Employment Service 3.450.05 Temporary Employment Services 26042 Applied Industrial Technology 1,182.88 Electrical Pads&Supplies 26043 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste OII Removal 26044 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 137.18 Publication 26045 Atlantis Pool Care 180.00 Service Agreement 26046 Awards&Trophies By Bea 63.03 Plaques 28047 ABM Business Machines, Inc. 156.36 Office Supplies 26048 AMAI/Keye Productivity Center 220.00 Registration 26049 APEX Communications 1,300.00 Security Equipment 26050 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 43.82 Telephone Service 26051 AT&T Wireless Services 343.46 Cellular Telephone Service 26052 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service 26053 Battery Specialties 498.45 Batteries 26054 Ben Meadows Company,Inc. 96.21 Lab Supplies 26055 Bloomberg L.P. 5,301.30 Financial Monitoring MO4-14-93 26056 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,226.25 Engineering Services 3-38-1 26057 Bush&Associates,Inc. 1.848.00 Surveying Services MO 5.25.97 26058 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 125.00 Membership 26059 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 9,709.00 Engineering Service J40-3 26060 Center for Watershed Protection 7.00 Publication 26061 Century Paint 367.58 Point Supplies 28062 Charles P.Crowley Co. 436.90 Instrument Pads 26D63 Compressor Components Of California 2,370.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26064 Computational Systems, Inc.(CSI) 899.07 Registration 26065 Connell GM Parts 105.87 Truck Supplies 26066 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 4.083.20 Electrical Supplies 26067 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 182.79 Plumbing Supplies 26068 Converse Consultants 204.00 Consulting Services 3-38-3 26069 Cooper Energy Services 181.15 Engine Supplies 26070 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,740.35 Copier Lease 26071 Corporate Express Imaging 350.19 Computer Supplies 26072 Corporate Express 254.39 Office Supplies 26073 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 981.07 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 25074 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 112.00 Communication Service Agreement 26075 County Wholesale Elaclric Co. 4.419.87 Electrical Supplies 26076 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Conference Registration 26077 CWEA Membership 55.00 Membership 26078 David Rosenblatt 386.00 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beech Issue 26079 David's Tree Service 5,040.00 Tree Meint.Service 26080 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 10,547.65 3 Notebook Computers 26081 DeZurik C/O Mtscn/SoulhWest 995.64 Valves 26082 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 164.43 Paint Supplies 26083 DOE;Engineering,Inc. 11,844.00 Temporary Employment Services Papa 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 311100 to 3/15/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26084 DGA Consultants,Inc. 144.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 26D85 Eberhard Equipment 214.78 Tractor Repair 26086 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 299.00 Medical Screening 26087 Electra-Bond 23.424.85 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 26088 Employers Group Service Corp. 585.00 Registration 26089 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 26090 Environmental Express 1,643.72 Lab Supplies 26091 Environmental Systems Research Inslilute,Inc. 2,000.00 Training Registration 26092 FedEx Corporation 230.69 Air Freight 26093 Filler Supply Company 100.27 Filters 26094 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 454.85 Lab Supplies 2W95 Flo-Systems,Inc. 441.90 Pump Supplies 26M Fountain Valley Camera 56.85 Photo Supplies 26097 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 211.00 Truck Wash Tickets 26098 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 83.73 Paint Supplies 26099 Foxbom Company 417.49 Instrument Supplies 2610D Pryor Seminars 195.00 Training Registration 26101 Fry's Electronics 501.80 Computer Supplies 26102 FM International, Inc. 0,212.29 Professional Services J-25-1 25103 GartaB-Callahan Company 42.03 Chemicals 25104 GTE California 5,979.80 Telephone Services 26105 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 10.862.95 Belt.Filter Press Supplies 26106 Government Finance Officers Association 49.95 Publication 26107 WW Grainger,Inc. 225.06 Compressor Supplies 26108 GBC(General Binding Corp) 226.04 Printing Service 25109 Hach Company 775.88 Chemicals 26110 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 424,07 Plumbing Supplies 26111 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 77.89 Catering Services 28112 Holmes 8 Narver,Inc. 1,573,43 Engineering Services 241 28113 Home Depot 225.13 Small Hardware 26114 Hub Auto Supply 294.45 Truck Parts 26115 Ictus Consulting,LL.C. 7,880.00 Records Management Program 28116 Imaging Plus, Inc. 8.00 Prinfing Service 26117 Industrial Metal Supply 312.78 Metal 26118 Infermatica Corporation 6,000.00 Consultant Service-Final Effluent Quality 26119 Irvine Photo Graphics 28.49 Photographic Services 26120 IBM Corporation 6,060.00 IBM AS/400 Y2K Hotsite 26121 Airgas Direct Intl.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,205.35 Safety Supplies 28122 J 5 B Auto Pads 9.83 Auto Parts 8 Supplies 26123 J 6 W Scienfific 1,550.97 Lab Supplies 26124 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5,329.95 Instrument Supplies 26725 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 1,991.22 Misc.Construction Services-Bubbler System Repair Bay Bridge P.S. 26126 Jay's Catering 70D.47 Catering Services 28127 Johnstone Supply 329.13 Electrical Supplies 26128 Kaman Industrial Technologies 2,935.15 Mechanical Supplies Page 4 of 7 0" Claims Paid From 3/1100 to 3115/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28129 Knox 1,616.75 Tools 26130 Lab Safety Supply,Ina 224.37 Safety Supplies 26131 Lab Support 744.00 Temporary Employment Services 26132 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 3.549.23 Engineering Consulting Services-J-47 26133 Liebert Cassidy 2,620.00 Professional Service-Human Resources 26134 Lumrs 47.50 Meeting Expense 28135 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 13,140.D0 Engineering Services PI-62 26136 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,519.21 Mechanical Supplies 26137 The Marketing Group,(ma 849.37 Lab Supplies 26135 MarVac Electronics 70.32 Instrument Supplies 26139 Adoo Systems, Inc. 2,264.42 Communication Equipment Upgrade 25140 Mc Junkin Corporation 609.07 Plumbing Supplies 26141 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,110.41 Tools 26142 Measurement Variables, Inc. 436.77 Fibers 26143 Mid-West Associates 1,126.83 Pump Supplies 26144 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 5,872.38 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 2e145 Milltronics,Inc. 489.51 Electrical Supplies 26146 Mission Uniform Service 3,381.20 Uniform Rentals 26147 MotoPhoto 69.65 Photographic Services 28148 Multiquip 2.13 Freight Adjustment 26149 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Association 50.00 Membership 26150 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1.252.90 Instrument Supplies 26151 Neal Supply Co. 352.12 Plumbing Supplies 25152 Nickey Petroleum Co., Ina 2,511.93 LubncanUDiesel Fuel 26153 Ninyo 6 Moore Corporate Accounting 477.75 Professional Services-Materials Tasting MO 6.24-98 26154 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 26155 Norrell Services,Inc. 224.06 Temporary Employment Service 26156 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2.027.55 Office Supplies 26157 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. 4,310.00 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 28158 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 10.61 Plumbing Supplies 28159 Oxygen Service Company 919.39 Specialty Gases 25160 OCB Reprographics 5,459.64 Printing Service-Spec P-173 26161 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 453.71 Electrical Supplies 28162 Pacific Mechanical Supply - 4,026.86 Plumbing Supplies 26163 Pagenet 2,037.63 Paging Services 26164 Polydyne, Inc. 22,884.96 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 26165 Port Supply 218.70 Rope 28166 Power Measurement Limited 13,025.00 Computer Supplies 26167 Prexair, Inc. 191.34 Welding Supplies 28168 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,789.82 Sevier Cleaning-Revenue Area 7 26169 Pryor Resources,Inc. 5,800.00 Training Registration 26170 Pump Engineering 2,748.35 Pump Supplies 26171 Pump Engineering Wor Q Air 1,572.01 Compressor Supplies 28172 Quality Building Supply 210.55 Landscaping Supplies 26173 Quanlera Environmental Services 2,328.00 Analytical Service Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 311/00 to 3116100 Werrent No. Vendor Amount Description 25174 Quickdeaning Janitorial Service 200.00 Groundskeeping Service 26175 Quickstan Technologies 3,325.00 Professional Service-Software 26176 Rachel Noble 56.16 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue 26177 Raney Industries 1.360.00 Contract Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification 26178 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1,412.00 Office Supplies 26179 Roto Rooter-N.O.C.011 7,500.00 Sewer Line Repair 26180 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 995.00 Engineering Services-Tunnel Valve Access Platform 26181 RPM Electric Motors 19,908.94 Electric Motor Repair 25182 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 104.63 Paint Supplies 26183 Safety-Kleen 4.193.00 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 26184 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 1,920.13 Mechanical Supplies 26185 Saratoga Institute,Inc. 2,490.68 Publications 26186 Sc wing Americo, Inc. 74.72 Pump Supplies 28187 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 161.63 Specially Gases 26188 Sears Industrial Sales 404.45 Mechanical Supplies 28189 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 8.212.76 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 26190 Second-Sun 156.20 Light Fixtures 26191 Sensotec,Inc. 537.46 Electrical Supplies 26192 Shade Concepts 6,890.00 Awning Installation-Admin.Bldg. 26193 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1.456.05 Tools/Hardware 28194 So.Cal.Gas Company 16,911.95 Natural Gas 28195 Southern California Edison 1,685.34 Power 28196 Southern Christian Leadership Conference 495.00 Notices 8 Ads 26197 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 221,08 Instrument Supplies 26198 Spex Certprep,Inc, 251.31 Lab Supplies 26199 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co.,Inc. 3,063.40 Pump Supplies 26200 Starbuck Truck Refinishing, Inc 404.00 Painting Service 26201 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annex.Processing Fee 26202 Sunset Industrial Parts 812.15 Mechanical Supplies 26203 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 26204 Textile Engineering Associates 230.00 Bell Press Supplies 26205 The Orange County Register 647,80 Notices 8 Ads 28206 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1.747.09 Mechanical Supplies 28207 Time Motion Tools 493.48 Tools 28208 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 26209 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 38.00 Locks 8 Keys 26210 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 1.300.02 Truck Supplies 26211 Truesdail Laboratories,Inc. 2,370.00 Lab Services 26212 Teksystems 2,295.20 Temporary Employment Services 26213 United Fermi Service 36.57 Parcel Services 26214 The University of Texas at Austin 450.00 Meeting Expense 26215 Unocal 76 58.22 Fuel for Vehicles-Contract 3-38-1 26216 U-Line 234.63 Office Supplies 26217 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,409.83 Plumbing Supplies 26218 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 11,400.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Computer Programming Page 6 of '� r , - Claim Paid From 311100 to 3115/00 Wemom No. Vendor Amount Description 26219 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1.422.00 Door Repair 26220 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,415.84 Lab Supplies 26221 Waters Corporation 149.58 Lab Supplies 26222 Western States Chemical,Inc. 203.13 Caustic Soda NO 8-23-95 26223 Xerox Corporation 2.790.71 Copier Leases 26224 Blake Anderson 199.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26225 Layne T. Baroldi 756.65 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimb. 26226 Danny L.Dillon 498.47 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimb. 26227 Michael D. Moore 863.75 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimb. 26228 Admire Renesou 8 Gateway,Inc. 2,939.22 Employee Computer Loan Program 26229 Jerry F.Evangelista 2.650.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 28230 Orange County Sanitation District 22,117.58 Workees Comp.Reimb. 26231 Orange County Sanitation District 29.63 Petty Cash Reimb. 26232 CSMFO 140.00 Seminar Registration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,036,970.31 Payroll Disbursements 18412-18554 Employee Paychecks $ 166,726.62 Biweekly Payroll 318/00 18555-18555 Employee Paycheck 2,078.78 Termination 46969-47417 Direct Deposit Statements 687,794.84 Biweekly Payroll 3r8/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 836.6W.24 Mm Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 148.301.49 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificele of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 128,819.11 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Participation State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of Ca. 105,801.31 February Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Participation Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. 44,295.25 12/1199-229/00 Ouarterly Liquidity Fee on Series C Certificate of Participation Total Wlre Transfer Payments It 427.217.16 Total Claims Paid 311100-3116/00 $ 5,30D,788.21 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 26233 Orange County Sanitation District 3 401.047.46 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 26234 Southern California Edison 45,919.54 Power 26235 Aidco Systems,Inc. 24,733.00 Professional Services-Network Labeling& Documentation 26236 Alliance for Marine Remote Sensing 19.05 Publication 26237 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,600.09 Training Materials 26238 ABB Instrumentation 495.40 Instrument Supplies 26239 APEX Communications 10,458.33 Security Equipment 26240 ASTD 150.00 Membership 26241 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 12.43 Telephone Service 26242 Court Order 479.DD Wage Garnishment 26243 Court Order 200.00 Wage Garnishment 26244 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1,594.70 Rope 26245 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 4.289.51 Security System Electrical Supplies 26246 City of Buena Park 638.37 Water Line Damage Reimb. 26247 Clemson University 4,425.00 Training Registration 26248 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 14.54 Office Supplies 26249 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 26250 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 889.57 Electrical Supplies 26251 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 406.08 Plumbing Supplies 26252 Cornerstone Management Consulting 5.148.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 26253 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.718.18 Electrical Supplies 26254 CSUS Foundation, Inc. 21.46 Publication 26255 Court Order 741.50 Wage Garnishment 26255 Fluid Dynamics 1,092.00 Primary Process Equipment Rental 26257 Friend of the Court 299.60 Wage Garnishment 26258 G.F.OA. 590.00 Registration 26259 Voided Check - - 26260 GTE California 946.45 Telephone Services 26261 Getinge Castle 332.79 Lab Supplies 26262 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 1.359.45 Dues Deduction 26263 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 9.966.32 Safety Supplies 26264 J.D. Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.00 Membership 26265 Johnstone Supply 199.85 Electrical Supplies 26266 Law/Crandall 2,694.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 26267 McGraw-Hill,Inc 144.24 Publication 26288 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 605.41 Tools 26269 Mesa Consolidated Water Dist. 764.00 Hydrant Meter Deposit 26270 Mobile Mini, Inc. 183.61 Storage Bins Rental 26271 New Horizons Computer Learning Center 169.00 Training Registration 26272 Office Depot Business Services Div. 138.35 Office Supplies 26273 Orange County Family Support 498.50 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 9 �. - Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrip0on 26274 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 26275 OCEA 586.20 Dues Deduction 26276 Pacific Bell 1.131.24 Telephone Services 26277 Pacific Industrial Supply 30.71 Furniture 26278 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 26279 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 26280 Peace Officers Council of CA 801.00 Dues Deduction 26281 Pinnacle One 16,866.00 Mediation Service 11-17-1 8 5-37-3 26282 Port Supply 17.78 Rope 26283 OuanetOvonics 193.40 Office Equipment Repair 26284 Rain for Rent 3,132.97 Plumbing Supplies 26285 R.A. Reed Electric 6,369.41 Motor Overhaul 26286 Saddle Island Institute 6,075.00 Training Registration-Analyzing Construction Schedules 26287 Santa Fe Industrial Products, Inc. 1,317.14 Mechanical Supplies 26288 Sceptre Advanced Business Solutions 4,128.00 Software Maint. 26289 $=it Specialty Gases, Inc. 447.78 Specialty Gases 26290 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,174.88 Tools 26291 So.CalBomis SLA Users Association 75.00 Membership 26292 State of California 133.04 Wage Garnishment 26293 Stephen Weisberg 811.45 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt. Beach Issue 26294 Summit Steel 346.48 Metal 26295 Super Power Products 334.03 Janitorial Supplies 26296 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,439.68 Mechanical Supplies 26297 The Unisource Corporation 7,074.56 Office Supplies 26298 United Way 432.50 Employee Contributions 26299 V&A Consulting Engineers 3,134.66 Engineering Service-Corrosion Assessment Study Phase it 26300 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 12.288.00 Consulting Service-Parametric Emissions Monitoring Program 26301 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.418.82 Lab Supplies 26302 Witeg Scientific 404.06 Lab Supplies 26303 Blake Anderson 685.00 Meelingrl"reining Expense Reimb. 26304 Robert S. Dumily 734.08 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimb. 26305 Peter M.Morrison 222.81 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimb. 26306 Hai Nguyen 835.60 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimb. 26307 Charles F.Winsor 249.28 Meetingrimining Expense Reimb. 26308 Carollo Engineers 44.040.04 Engineering Service J-254 26309 Cyclus Envirosyslems,Inc. 43,665.88 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 26310 Cytec Industries 28.411.05 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 26311 Delta Dental 41,874.68 Dental Insurance Plan 26312 Holmes 6 Narver, Inc. 31,149.19 Engineering Services 241 26813 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 114,677.58 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 26314 Reliastar 27,522.29 Employee Medical Health Premium 26315 Tren Consulting Engineers 38,469.00 Consulting Service 546 Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116100 to W31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26316 Tran Consulting Engineers 27,860.00 Consulting Service P1-65 26317 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 97.625.03 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 26318 V&A Consulting Engineers 34.390.86 Engineering Service-Evaluating Sulfide Removal 26319 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 204,314.26 Generator Repair J-33-1 26320 Vulcan 46,396.22 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 26321 Barnard Construction Company, Inc. 227,160.00 Construction 3-35R&3-11R 26322 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 121.511.70 Construction 3-38-1 26323 Ken Thompson, Inc. 89,088.13 Construction 11-17-3 26324 Mladen Buntich Construction Company 241.555.38 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 26325 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 26,594.66 Engineering Services 240 26326 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 281.931.80 Construction 7-7-1 26327 Union Bank of California 25,240.00 Construction 3-35R 26328 A-Plus Systems 3.050.45 Notices&Ads 26329 AcouStandard, Inc. 739.01 Lab Supplies 26330 Action Instruments 1,285.65 Electrical Supplies 26331 Great American Printing Co. 562.10 Office Supplies 26332 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 5,000.23 Engineering Services-Emissions Monitoring Systems 26333 Advanced Enterprise Solutions 638.75 Registration 26334 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,002.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26335 Air Liquids America Corp. 664.43 Specialty Gasses 26338 Air Products&Chemicals 317.69 Lab Supplies 26337 Airborne Express 132.86 Air Freight 26338 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 1,057.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26339 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 104.09 Mechanical Supplies 26340 Alternative Dispute Resolution Design Group 4,400.00 Human Resources Service 26341 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 26342 Appleone Employment Service 10.443.47 Temporary Employment Services 26343 Applied Industrial Technology 53.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 26344 Arms Data Security 106.80 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 26345 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 2,D99.00 Vacuum Truck Services 26346 Artistic Blinds 486.66 Office Supplies 26347 Arts Disposal Service, Inc. 926.72 Waste Removal 26348 Atlantis Pool Care 360.00 Service Agreement 26349 American Air Filter International 1,391.99 Filter 26350 AMS(Acoustical Material Service) 999.59 Ceiling Tile 26351 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 401.29 Telephone Service 26352 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 191.51 Telephone Service 26353 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,416.75 Long Distance Telephone Service 26354 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 26355 Bailey,Fisher&Porter 354.95 Instrument Maint. 26356 Barton Instruments,L.L.C. 2,173.56 Instrument Supplies 26357 Battery Specialties 522.89 Batteries Page 3 of 9 �c Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26358 Baudville 1,043.06 Office Supplies 26359 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 2.384.70 Lab Supplies 26360 Berkel 8 Company Contractors, Inc. 7,882.00 Constmcton Pl-37 26361 Burlington Safety Laboratory of CA,Inc. 1,161.46 Safety Supplies 26382 Cal-Glass, Inc. 167.12 Lab Equipment Service 26363 California Automatic Gate 85.00 Service Agreement 26364 Callan Associates,Inc. 3.550.00 Investment Advisor 26365 Caltrol, Inc. 813.16 Electrical Pads 8 Supplies 28368 Camp Dresser 8 McKee,Inc. 15,432.68 Engineering Service-Computer Modeling Program 26367 Cathcart Garda von Langen Engineers 1,570.00 Engineering Services-Reclaimed Water Line Extension 26366 City of Fountain Valley 15,369.18 Water Use 26369 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 2,504.37 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 25370 Coast Fire Equipment 438.13 Service Agreement 26371 Color Arts,Inc. 2.339.04 Vehicle Decals 26372 Compressor Components Of California 975.14 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 28373 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 9,882.50 Computer Maint.Agreement 26374 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 1.416.32 Electical Supplies 28375 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.363.11 Plumbing Supplies 26376 Converse Consultants 1,439.75 Consulting Services P2-60 26377 Cooper Energy Services 462.12 Engine Supplies 26378 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,282.20 Copier Lease 26379 Corporate Express Imaging 3,006.23 Computer Supplies 26380 Corporate Express 675.54 Office Supplies 26361 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 562.50 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 26382 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 491.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26383 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4.741.62 Electrical Supplies 26384 Crane America Services,Inc. 7.390.00 Crane Services 26385 Culligan of Orange County 30.00 Soft Water Service 26386 CEPA Company 85.00 Lab Equipment Maim. Service 26387 OR 8 R, Inc. 1,324.20 Container Rentals 26368 Dapper Tire Co. 3,470.03 Truck Time 26389 Davey's Locker 2,400.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 26390 Del Mar Analytical 2.375.00 Blosolids Analysis 26391 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 18,625.68 9 Computers 81 Tape Backup 26392 Diamond H Recognition 667.29 Employee Service Awards 26393 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 455.17 Paint Supplies 26394 DDS Engineering, Inc. 14,992.13 Temporary Employment Services 26395 DGA Consultants, Inc. 2,376.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 26396 E.G.Heller's Son,Inc. 58.24 Tools 26397 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 980.00 Medical Screening 26398 Edwin M.Perkins 7,242.09 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 26399 Eldridge Products 1,610.61 Instrument Maint.Service Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid From 3I16100 to 3I31I00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26400 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 900.00 Training Registration 28401 Empire Scales,Inc. 250.00 Scale Repair 26402 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 26403 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 943.70 Lab Supplies 26404 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,003.44 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 26405 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 516.22 Mainl.Service Agreement 26406 Favpress,Inc. 3,085.39 Office Supplies 26407 FedEx Corporation 99.45 Air Freight 26408 Filter Supply Company 162.47 Filters 26409 First American Real Estate Solutions 146.26 Orange County Property Information Subscription 26410 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 834.24 Lab Supplies 26411 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 357.00 Concrete Cutting 26412 Flo-Systems, Inc. 98.74 Pump Supplies 28413 Fomaciad Corp. 145.95 Plumbing Supplies 26414 Fountain Valley Camera 89.24 Photo Supplies 26415 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 123.27 Point Supplies 26416 Pryor Seminars 195.00 Training Registration 28417 Fry's Electronics 51.14 Computer Supplies 26418 Full Spectrum Analyfics, Inc. 673.14 Lab Instrument Service 26419 City of Fullerton 74.61 Water Use 26420 Gardner-Denver clo Misco 220.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26421 Gates Fiberglass Installers 600.00 Fiberglass Repair 26422 GTE California 106.50 Telephone Services 26423 George Yardley Co. 408.87 Lab Supplies 26424 Glerlirh-Mitchell, Inc. 1,587.26 Belt, Filler Press Supplies 28425 Glenn Lukos&Associates 6,786.67 Engineering Service 241 26426 Glenn's Tackle Shop 93.69 Lab Supplies 26427 WIN Grainger, Inc. 225.42 Compressor Supplies 26428 Hach Company 2,205.62 Chemicals 26429 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,648.04 Plumbing Supplies 26430 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 5,109.99 Engine Generator Control Supplies 26431 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 29.00 Catering Services 26432 HIM, Inc. 803.78 Tools 26433 Home Depot 1.323.83 Small Hardware 26434 City of Huntington Beach 14,427.84 Water Use 28435 Hyspan Precision Products,Inc. 1,791.14 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26436 Ida= 3,358.39 Lab Supplies 26437 Industrial Metal Supply 2,333.44 Metal 28438 StateNet 200.00 Online Service 26439 Information Resources 270.00 Human Resources Service 26440 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 152.50 Lab Supplies 26441 Irvine Photo Graphics 5.92 Photographic Services Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 28442 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use 26443 IBM Corp. 8,076.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 26444 Airgas Direct Ind.-IPCO Safety Div. 1,139.42 Safety Supplies 26445 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5242.30 Instrument Supplies 28446 J.D.Edwards 1,020.00 Training Registration 26447 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 900.00 Misc.Construction Services-Motor Installation 26448 Jay's Catering 32.33 Catering Services 26449 Jobtrak 95.00 Notices&Ads 26450 Johnson Power Ltd. 832.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 26451 Johnstone Supply 112.07 Electrical Supplies 26452 Kabbera Engineering 3,545.66 Professional Services-Traffic Control 26453 Kaman Industrial Technologies 572.16 Mechanical Supplies 26454 Karen Monaco&Associates 11,937.50 FIS Support Services 26455 Kensington Electronics 760.18 Electrical Supplies 26456 Knox Industrial Supplies 4,138.91 Tools 26457 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 2,197.65 Safety Supplies 26458 Lab Support 3,534.00 Temporary Employment Services 26459 La MoBe Chemical Products 1,091.38 Chemicals 26460 Lee&Ro, Inc. 2,802.47 Engineering Consulting Services J-46 26461 Lexis-Nazis 112.99 Books&Publications 26462 Gerald R.Jones 8.883.73 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 28463 Liquid Handling Systems 3.889.78 Pumping Supplies 26464 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 897.80 Professional Services-Corrosion 26465 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,794.08 Tools 26486 Measurement Variables,Inc. 1,070.20 Air Dryer 26467 Medlin Controls Co. 2,887.95 Instrument Supplies 28468 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch Site Study 26469 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 606.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 28470 Mission Uniform Service 3,314.2e Uniform Rentals 26471 Montgomery Watson 2,445.30 Professional Service-Emission Modeling 26472 Management Action Programs,Inc. 4,400.00 Training Registration 26473 MCR Technologies, Inc. 720.21 Instrument Supplies 26474 National Institue of Business Mgnt. 48.00 Construction 11-17.3 26475 National Microcomp Services 1.258.50 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 26476 National Plant Services, Inc. 2,332.50 Vacuum Truck Services 26477 Neal Supply Co. 826.36 Plumbing Supplies 26478 Newark Electronics 858.24 Instrument Supplies 26479 Nicholas Netty 4.800.00 Legal Service-INS Processing 26480 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 14.687.07 LubricantlDiesel Fuel 26481 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 732.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 26482 The Norco Companies 140.00 Mail Delivery Service 26483 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.874.94 Office Supplies Page 0 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3/31100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26484 Orange County Wholesale Electric, Inc. 793.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 26485 Orange County Water District 4,068.66 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 26486 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 1,193.88 Fittings 26487 Oxygen Service Company 361.98 Specialty Gases 26488 OCB Reprographics 11,885.12 Printing Service-Spec P-173 26489 OCE-USA,Inc. 375.44 Computer Equipment Maint. 26490 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 651.11 Electrical Supplies 26491 Pacific Bell 30.60 Telephone Services 26492 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 26493 Pacific Mechanical Supply 145.10 Plumbing Supplies 26494 Padre Janitorial Supplies 289.76 Janitorial Supplies 26495 Parker Supply Company 8,394.00 Electrical Supplies 26496 Parkhouse Tire Co. 176.93 Tires 26497 Pads Unlimited 142.85 Truck Supplies 26498 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 808.40 Lab Supplies 26499 Philip J.W.Roberts,PHD, PE 1,997.50 Expert Panelist Reimb.-Hunt.Beach Issue 26500 Pickens Fuel Corp. 496.14 Professional Service-CNG Program 26501 Polydyne,Inc. 23,394.29 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 26502 Ponlon Industries 2.337.02 Instrument Supplies 26503 Power Design 3,356.41 Electrical Supplies 265D4 Power Electra Supply Co., Inc. 80.23 Electrical Supplies 26505 Power Lift Corporation 3,750.00 On-Site Forklift Safety Training 26506 Precision Backhoe 995.00 Equipment Rental 26507 Presentation Products,Inc. 329.17 Office Supplies 26506 Cambridge Integrated Service 2,083.33 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 26509 Process Software Corp. 2,264.87 Software Maint. 26510 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 9.027.69 Sewer Cleaning-Revenue Area 7 26511 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3.102.05 Mechanical Supplies 26512 COS,L.L.C. 268.62 Investment Management Program Service 26613 R.L Abbott 8 Associates 12,ODD.00 Kem County 8iosolids Consulting Services 26514 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,393.48 Trash Removal 26515 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5.386.28 Life Insurance Premium 26516 The Richardson Company-Training Media 1,775.66 Office Supplies 26517 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 13.95 Training Supplies 26518 RPM Electric Motors 647.04 Electric Motor Repair 26519 S.S.Mechanical Corp 19,578.00 Construction P1-36-2 26520 Safety-Kleen 225.47 Service Agreement-Hazardous Waste 26521 Santa Ana Electric Motors 2.724.53 4 Motors 26522 Santa Fe Industrial Products,Inc. 436.85 Mechanical Supplies 26523 Schwing America,Inc. 76.80 Pump Supplies 26524 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 19,562.34 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 26525 Scientific Refrigeration 3,245.16 Refrigerator Repair Page 7 of 9 ,.. Claims Paid From 3116100 to 3131100 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26526 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,284.37 Specialty Gases 26527 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 2.432.30 Lab Equipment Repair&Supplies 26528 Sears Industrial Sales 375.20 Mechanical Supplies 26529 Seaventures 4,650.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 26530 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 4.927.50 Professional Services-Ocean Oudall Instrumentation 26531 Second-Sun 467.70 Light Fixtures 26532 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 103.44 Tools 26633 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,912.53 ToolsMardware 26534 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Service-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 20535 Sk11IPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration 26536 Soto-Lynch Corp. 1,768.75 Janitorial Supplies 26537 SoBChoice 444.62 Software 26538 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 417.88 Emission Fees 26539 South Coast Environmental Co. 6.447.00 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 26540 Southern California Edison 66.33 Power 26541 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 831.25 Janitorial Supplies 25542 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 500.00 COP Trustee Services 26543 Statoil Energy,Inc. 150.00 Registration 28544 Stewarrs De-Rooting&Plumbing 660.00 Plumbing Service 26545 Strata International,Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 26546 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 4,420.D0 Landscape Mainl. 26547 Sunset Industrial Parts 280.39 Mechanical Supplies 26548 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 235.19 Electric Cart Parts 26549 Tekmar-Dohrman 182.37 Lab Supplies 26550 The Meniwood Corporation 3,149.64 Professional Services-Biosolids Land Inspection 26551 Forma Scientific Division 1.782.59 Lab Supplies 26552 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 639.59 Mechanical Supplies 26553 Thyssen Dover Elevator Corporation 1,331.10 Elevator Maintenance 265U Time Warner Communications 42.49 Cable Services 26555 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 465.59 Locks&Keys 26556 The Trans Company 685.89 Electrical Supplies 28557 Transcat 862.38 Electdcei Supplies 26568 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 2.550.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 26569 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 323.97 Truck Supplies 26560 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 170.00 Lab Services 26561 Teksystems 3.587.80 Temporary Employment Services 26562 Ultra Scientific 378.03 Lab Supplies 28563 United Parcel Service 860.35 Parcel Services 26564 University of Washington 70.00 Registration 26565 USFIlter Westales 1,414.41 Instrument Supplies 26566 Valley Cities Supply Company 27.03 Plumbing Supplies 26567 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 17,508.00 Consulting Services-Ocean&Emissions Monitoring Computer Programming Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid From 3116/00 to 3/31/00 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 26568 Vapex, Inc. 8,506.66 Pump Supplies 26669 Veme's Plumbing 15.684.97 Plumbing Equipment Repair 26670 Vertex,Inc. 943.89 Software Maint. 26571 Village Nurseries 76.42 Landscaping Supplies 26572 VCI Mechanical 275.00 Fuel Tank Certification Service 26573 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 9,135.72 Lab Supplies 26574 The Wackenhut Corporation 12.069.01) Security Guards 26575 Western States Chemical,Inc. 18,331.68 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 26576 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 67.77 Electrical Supplies 26577 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 1.958.51 Instrument Maint. 26578 Xerox Corporation 14,382.27 Copier Leases 26579 Union Bank of California 13,501.30 Construction 3-38-1 26580 Union Bank of California 11,136.02 Construction 11.17.3 26581 Thomas M.Flanagan 118.44 Mee0ng/Training Expense Reimb. 26582 Chuck M. Forman 1.122.29 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimb. 26583 Charles G. Lee 210.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb, 26584 James D.Niswonger 127.50 Meefing/rmining Expense Reimb. 26585 John W.Swindler 687.64 Meeting?raining Expense Reimb. 26586 Frankie J.Woodside 633.64 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26507 Moyasar T.Vahya 977.85 Meeting/Training Expense Reimb. 26588 Tyler T. Hoang 2,D31.57 Employee Computer Loan Program 28689 Frank A.Leong 2,016.07 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,080,812.83 Payroll Disbursements 18556-18074 Employee Paychecks $ 159.034.04 Biweekly Payroll 3/22/00 18675- 18677 Employee Paycheck 22.723.66 Termination 47418.47862 Direct Deposit Statements 677,639A7 Biweekly Payroll 3/22/00 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 859,397.17 Total Claims Paid 3116/00-3131/00 $ 3,946,010.00 Page 9 019 r BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/26/DD AGENDA REPORT em NumEe Hem 9Numbu a1(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: QUITCLAIM A 15-FOOT WIDE BY 213.77-FOOT LONG ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT EASEMENT TO CURRENT LANDOWNER, PLANTERO DRIVE LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 12332 CINNABAR ROAD, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to execute a quitclaim deed for a 15-foot wide by 213.77-foot long sewer easement to Plantero Drive LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, in a form acceptable to General Counsel. SUMMARY Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) currently owns a 15-foot wide easement, which crosses in the center of a parcel, located in between Foothill Blvd. and Plantero Drive. This parcel is located in the unincorporated area of Orange County. The current owner of this parcel, Plantero Drive LLC, would like to subdivide this parcel into three parcels and build three homes. The current owner has granted OCSD a 14-foot wide by 242.85-foot long easement located on the northwesterly property line of the same parcel, in exchange for our existing easement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Hbq.IXaYpmM M lgenN RepaY\2YeP, ApeMa Rep.MaNlOMem B(a)M Rewq. ,rmna Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The existing easement has an 8-inch VCP sewer that runs from Foothill Blvd. to Plantero Drive which is owned by OCSD. The current owner will abandon the existing sewer line and install a new 8-inch sewer line according to our standards in the new easement. The District did not pay any money for the original easement. Staff requests approval to quitclaim the15-foot wide by 213.77 foot long easement to Plantero Drive LLC, in a form acceptable to General Counsel. ALTERNATIVES Deny the quitclaim request. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit"A"-Legal Description of Easement to be Quitclaimed 2. Exhibit"B"-Sketch of Easement to be Quitclaimed CFW:RLC:jak HAwp.dta�agendatBoard Agenda Repodst2000 Boats Agenda RepodsV"Wem 9(a)dot H Ms.CbWwWusu,E Ap�W Re0ub30roeum/genaRppWMmMn ePI M AeA move Page 2 'r v Pagel of 2 Exhibit `A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Orange County Sanitation District Revenue Area No. 7 That portion of Lot 42 and Lot X both in Tract No. 670 recorded in Book 10 Page 5 of Miscellaneous maps, records of Orange cowry and that portion of Lot 42 in Tract No. 670 recorded in Book 20 pages 40 and 41 of Miscellaneous Maps,,Records of said County,all in the County of Orange, State of California described as follows: The Northwesterly 14.00 feet of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 98-181, said Parcel Map recording concurrently herewith. oQQ,OFEaB/O,Yq PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION: qe� t 8Tgh`FyP f✓' /%Cwr 4LD(7/L(j Z/2 8 0 0 a G. Bart Stryker RCE 13195 Date *r CIVI\. �* �rFCF CAUE�� EXHIBI T 'B' SHEET 2 of 2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIP77ON ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT REVENUE AREA No. 7 I � 1 1 , , 1 � 1 + 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 u 1 11 Il � 5 2p 20% PARCEL 2t 1 OF PARCEL MAP 1 98-181 51 t 11 N22'J4'00'W 31.55' N137245W 242.85' 29.50' 11 P\ \ N8P41'�'E t \ st 1 11 \ \ PARCEL J 1 1 t\ zt OF PARCEL MAP \ 4 __ ------- ------------ jj � h 1 \ \ \ t \ \ . BART $TNYK i.. 'r} °NL tF G. BART SMWER F BOARD OF DIRECTORS MealngD� To! awr. e.U000 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbs Item Numbs 9 bl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, GWR Project Team Leader SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT PLANNING FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District, providing for appointment of alternate Directors in lieu of the General Manager to the Joint Cooperative Committee. SUMMARY Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Joint Cooperative Committee has asked that the Agreement be changed so that three alternate Directors, one for each Director, are appointed from each of the two Districts' Boards in lieu of the General Managers. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:GWR System,J38, Section 8, Page 214) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District entered into a cooperative agreement in 1997 for project planning for what is now the GWRS. In March 1998, that Agreement was amended by Amendment No. 1 to create a Joint Cooperative Committee consisting of three Directors from each District and alternate Directors consisting of the General Managers of the two Districts. A subsequent, unrelated Amendment No. 2, was made in Page 1 December of 1998. The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) has now requested that the Agreement be amended to substitute Board Members from each of the two Districts as alternates in place of the General Managers. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost-effective alternatives. CEOA FINDINGS Environmental Impact Report for Groundwater Replenishment System was certified on March 24, 1999. ATTACHMENTS March 20, 2000, JCC Agenda Report WS:jo Hiwp.dla\agenda\Board Agenda RepodaU9gO Board Agenda RepodaVWOWem 9(E)AW Page 2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: March 20, 2000 Budgeted: N/A Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Cost Estimate: N/A System Cooperative Committee General Counsel Approval: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. Project Report Approved: Yes Donald F. McIntyre CEOA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: CHANGE TO JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP SUMMARY A change adding alternates directors to the Committee is recommended for consideration. RECOMMENDATION Consideration a change in Alternate Director Membership and Amendment No. 3 to Cooperative Agreement. BACKGROUND The GWR System is governed under a Cooperative Agreement authorized by the OCWD and OCSD Boards of Directors in the Spring of 1997. Your Committee (JCC), appointed prior to the Cooperative Agreement, has managed the project since the December 1996/January 1997 official start-up. In March 1998, the JCC was formally authorized by Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement. A second amendment was approved in December 1998. Under current authority, three Directors are appointed, each from OCSD and OCWD, in accordance with each agency's rules. The General Managers, at the discretion of their respective Boards, serve as alternates. In order to provide for timely succession of members, consideration of appointing other Directors as alternates is suggested. Coming to the meetings as an alternate would provide valuable background for replacing members who leave the Committee. If Directors were added as alternates from each agency, there would no longer be a need for the General Managers to serve in that role to meet quorum requirements. JCC Membership Change March 20, 2000 Page 2 of 2 It is suggested that you consider up to three alternate Directors from each agency. If your Committee decides to utilize Directors as alternates, the appointments can be made for OCWD by the President of the Board of Directors and for OCSD by the Chair of the Board of Directors, upon approval of an authorizing amendment. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS Cooperative Agreement approved in February/April 1997 and amended in March 1998 and December 1998. BOARD OF DIRECTORS n non Taaea.��siooau.. AGENDA REPORT Iem NumGv I Ittm Cc) xu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mark Esquer, O&M Process Engineering Manager SUBJECT: Belt Filter Press Retrofit Unit Trial GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Amend Board Minutes of December 15, 1999 relative to approving a project with Ashbrook Corporation to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit at no cost to the District, and the subsequent purchase of that unit in FY 2000-01 at an approximate cost of$125,000 contingent upon the achievement of at least a 4% improvement in cake solids. SUMMARY At the December 15, 1999 Board Meeting, the Board approved a six-month trial to evaluate a dewatering belt press retrofit unit to enhance the solids content of dewatered biosolids. Additionally, this project stipulates that the District purchase the trial retrofit unit at a cast of approximately $125,000 only if the unit is successful in enhancing the cake solids by at least 4%. Staff reported in the Board Action that the Board approved the belt press retrofit unit trial project with Gierlich Mitchell, Inc. Staff should have reported Ashbrook Corporation, the original equipment manufacturer of this trial unit as the contractual party. Gierlich Mitchell, Inc. is Ashbrook Corporation's representative for this equipment. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. tune item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS R wy�H Rwu a WHam•�b101wno C)M R. e W Page 1 w DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, March 22, 2000 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, March 22, 2000 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Tom Nixon, Counsel Peer Swan,Vice Chair Craig Farrington, Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Director Jim Ferryman Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Bill Mahoney, County CAD's Representative Director Lynn Daucher Directors Absent: Ryal Wheeler Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Gary Streed, Director of Finance Andre loan, Engineering Project Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 23, 2000 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair welcomed Director Ferryman to the meeting. r Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 March 22, 2000 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre reported that there was a correction necessary to Board Agenda Item 15.(c), which he would announce at the Board meeting. There is a need to address a personnel matter at both the Steering Committee and Board meetings that surfaced after the agenda was prepared. Mr. McIntyre also congratulated David Ludwin, Director of Engineering,for receiving the Orange County Engineering Council's Distinguished Engineering Achievement Award. Andre loan, Engineering Department Project Manager, provided a recap on the issues pertaining to the continued integrity of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. About five miles of this line are considered at risk and staff is looking at five alternatives to protect or relocate this trunkline. The Draft EIR is being finalized and will be distributed. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2004, however, mitigation measures will be significant and could be costly. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D) A. Request for Contribution for Sewer Line Construction to Serve Bexley Neichborhood Annexation to the City of Brea Director Lynn Daucher discussed the issue of financial assistance to homeowners for sewer connections from the City of Brea's standpoint, and Bill Mahoney, County CAO's representative, expressed the concerns of Orange County Supervisor Smith. There are two public policy issues that should be considered: 1)getting rid of county islands within the service area, and 2)protecting the groundwater supply. District-wide,there are about 3,000 properties that are still on septic systems. Director Swan expressed concern about equity for those property owners that bought into the system. Director Saltarelli mentioned that a connection to a sewer increases the value of the property, and suggested that a lien be placed on those annexing parcels that would be paid when the property sold. Mr. McIntyre will meet with the Brea City Manager to obtain the formula that was used to develop each agency's portion of the annexation costs. Staff was directed to proceed with negotiations to include installment payment agreements or liens. B. Development of Five-year Staffino Plan Greg Mathews described the approach staff will be taking in developing the new report, which will be presented to the Directors in the fall. He indicated that the reductions experienced in the last five years were relatively easy and further reductions will come with more difficulty. The Committee requested that a bi-monthly progress report be made to the FAHR Committee during the development phase. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 March 22,2000 C. Increase $3000 Cap for IDEAs The IDEA program awards proven cost savings or safety suggestions. At this time the Board approved cap is 10%of the savings up to$3,000. Staff has requested that the cap be increased if an IDEA was submitted that could save the District over$500,000. The Committee members expressed support for the program and directed staff to develop several recommendations that might be considered by the Steering Committee at a future meeting. D. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees was reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY General Counsel's representative,Tom Nixon, reported that it would be necessary to vote on adding a personnel matter to the closed session agenda. The members unanimously agreed that there was a need to add the item to the closed session agenda. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEOUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION ANDIOR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:04 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9,to confer with General Counsel re: A. Michael Rozengurt v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 808544, and Worker's Compensation Appeals Board Case No. AHM 0062970. B. General Manager's Performance Evaluation. The members voted to convene a special closed session to discuss the General Manager performance and compensation. W Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 March 22, 2000 C. Employee request for a Board hearing on disciplinary action. D. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of the Joint Board will report on the actions when they are approved. At 6:36 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session to discuss Item B.A. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. to a special meeting on Monday, April 3 at 2 p.m. bmilted by^ J Tappan e ring Committee Secretary HMpNelepageLSM,np CwmwerNOAIeNO'A4lW SLMmmbx DRAFT MINUTES OF ADJOURNED STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, April 3, 2000 An adjourned meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Monday, April 3,2000 at 2 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Jan Debay, Chair of the Board Peer Swan, Vice Chair STAFF PRESENT: Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee None Norm Eckenrode, Chairman, PDC Committee Directors Absent: Tom Saltarelli, Chairman, FAHR Committee Jim Silva, Supervisor, County of Orange (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 2:05 p.m. in Closed Session to discuss two personnel matters, as follows: 1) Reviewed and approved General Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and Compensation. The objectives for the next year will be developed at future meetings. 2) The Steering Committee appointed Chair Debay Labor Negotiator and provided direction re salary, benefits, terms and conditions of employment for Blake P.Anderson, General Manager. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of the Joint Board will report on the actions when they are approved. At 2:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 April 3, 2000 (5) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. bmitted by. MwTappan St Bring Committee Secretary �'Mv.deraw,a�s«n,a a,,,.n«woua�+uvw u:,wu w�mow,w ueema ac STEERING COMMITTEE neennpodte TOBd.of Dir. 9/M/00 4/16/00 u AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Teem Nmbe r Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D. Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne T. Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF SENATE BILL 1956 (POLANCO) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-03, Declaring Support for Senate Bill 1956 (Polanco) Uniform Statewide Regulation of Biosolids Land Application SUMMARY Biosolids management programs throughout California have been experiencing increased local opposition to land application of Class B biosolids. Much of the opposition is based on unsupported public perception concerns over the risks posed by pathogens in biosolids. Several counties in California have adopted ordinances that are prohibitively restrictive or ban the land application of Class B biosolids. Senate Bill 1956 (Polanco) would prohibit local governments from enacting or enforcing an ordinance more restrictive than state and federal requirements unless there is substantial peer- reviewed scientific evidence to support more restrictive standards. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Two classes of biosolids were created with respect to pathogen reduction, Class A and Class B. Biosolids achieving the Class B designation typically undergo treatment to significantly reduce, but not eliminate pathogens. Class B biosolids can only be used in conjunction with specific federal and state regulations for land application. These Class B regulations have been proven to be protective of human health and the environment. Class A biosolids typically undergo further treatment that reduces pathogens to below detectable levels. Typically, no site restrictions are required after land application of Class A biosolids. The District produces approximately 190,000 tons of Class B biosolids annually. In 1999, 66% of our biosolids went to counties that are either considering restrictions or have already adopted bans on biosolids land application. 1wdmw.etwp.mv d. MNenU Ropc R MNa ReRw�tt(c)dw R...m, v Page 1 Unfortunately, opposition to biosolids recycling based on public perception has resulted in politicizing the biosolids controversy at the local level. As such, several counties in California have adopted ordinances that are prohibitively restrictive or ban the land application of Class B biosolids. Several other local governments are under increasing pressure to follow suit due to fear that biosolids will be forced into their jurisdictions in a short time frame that is not conducive to proper management and oversight. Recently, Kern County adopted an ordinance that will ban Class B biosolids land application on January 1, 2003. To support the District's biosolids management efforts, staff requests the Steering Committee recommend the Board of Directors adopt the attached Resolution supporting Senate Bill 1956 at their April 26, 2000 meeting. Senate Bill 1956 will require the adoption of a statewide, science-based, uniform regulation for the land application of Class B biosolids in California. Senate Bill 1956 will continue to allow local control when the regulation is based on substantial, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence and it can be shown that unreasonable adverse effects on the environment or public health within the local jurisdiction would exist. Such a resolution of support from a body representing more than 2.2 million people will be a valuable document for the District's biosolids management program's advocacy efforts. Several stakeholders have stated their position on this bill co-sponsored by the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. In support of this bill are League of Cities, the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, and the East Bay Municipal Utilities District. The only entity on record in opposition to the bill is Kern County. Interested stakeholders that have yet to take position are the Farm Bureau, Western Growers Association, and the California State Association of Counties. This resolution of support will be instrumental in assisting working with the author and other stakeholders to craft an acceptable bill that puts in place a uniform, statewide program that protects the interests of all stakeholders, including POTWs, local government, and the farming community. ALTERNATIVES • Oppose and see similar bans like that placed on land application of Class B biosolids in Kern County replicated in other counties • Stay neutral on the bill and allow other agencies to take the lead CECA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS • Resolution No. OCSD 00-03 • Senate Bill 1956, March 28, 2000 Amended Version 1ga]Jnba e1M9 dbtagm aN and agenda RanaftV B dd Agenda FagoNgN ddaae 111q M Penfed Page 2 i RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTDECLARING SUPPORT OF SENATE BILL 1956 (POLANCO) WHEREAS, biosolids are the residuals from municipal wastewater processing which have been properly treated so that they may be safely recycled to amend soil through direct land application; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) produce biosolids at their wastewater treatment plants and desire to continue to recycle their biosolids in this environmentally responsible manner; and WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency conducted a comprehensive review of the risks associated with reuse of biosolids via application to the land and established standards for such reuse under 40 CFR Part 503 in 1993. The National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences reviewed these standards and judged them to be protective of human health and the environment; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) declared state policy to maximize the recycling of materials that might otherwise be disposed of in landfills. Since the adoption of standards to assure the safety of this practice, biosolids have been increasingly recycled via application to agricultural land. In 1998, 100% of the District's biosolids and 65% of the biosolids produced in California were recycled in this method. Continuation of this recycling will preserve space in landfills for wastes that cannot be recycled; and WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board is preparing an Environmental Impact Report for a statewide General Order for General Waste Discharge Requirements for the Discharge of Biosolids to Land for Use in Agricultural, Silvicultural, Horticultural, and Land Reclamation Activities in California. Through this process, scientifically defensible standards will be established that will address California's unique circumstances, using a uniform approach to the issues; and WHEREAS, a piecemeal approach to the regulation of biosolids has been developing in the State of California, with some local governments establishing prohibitively restrictive requirements or bans on biosolids reuse. Other local governments are under increasing pressure to follow suit due to fear that biosolids will be forced into their jurisdictions in a short time frame which is not conducive to proper management and oversight; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1956 will assure that any local government ordinances adopted that are more restrictive than the federal or state requirements must be based on substantial, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence and a showing of unreasonable adverse effects on the environment or public health within the local jurisdiction. This legislation was B 4 introduced at the urging of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and other publicly owned treatment works because of the proliferation of biosolids ordinances based on perceptions rather than sound science. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby declare its support of Senate Bill 1956, which will promote the continued recycling of biosolids in accordance with state and federal regulations and cooperation between rural and urban counties of the state of California in managing biosolids in an environmentally responsible manner. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on the 2e day of April, 2000. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H:ap.dt WMWB5V2esdNbnSMW'00-03.dac Shirley McCmokm Lynn Daucha Director from the City ofAnaheim Director fin.the City ofl3. Gerald N.Sigla Anne L.Piacy Dimtw from the City of Be.Park Director from the City ofCyp= Guy Camenzo Don Bankhead Director fmm the City of Fountain Valley Director fmm the City of Fullerton Mark Leyes Pets Green Director fmm the City of Garden(hove Dinneen fmm the City of Huntington Beach Christina Shea Steve Anderson Director fmm the City of Wm Ditector from the City of la Habra Paul Walker Charles E. Silva Direetm from the City of L.Palma Director Item the City ofI.os Alamitos Jan Debay Mmk A.Murphy Di ectm from the City ofNewpod Beach Director from the City ofOange Norman Z.Eckenrodc Pet McGuigan Director from the City of Placentia Director from the City of Santa Ana She"Boyd Brien Donahue Director from the City of Seal Borah Director fmm the City of Stanton Thomas R. Saltarelli Russell Patterson Duector from the City of Tustin Dimcer fmm the City of Ville Park John M.Gullocson Jams M.Ferryman Director from the City of Yorba Unda Director from the Costa Mesa Sanitary Diahict Joy L.Neugebaucf Pea A.Swan Director fmm the Midway City Sanitary District Director from the Irvine Ranch Water District Jim Silva Director from the Board of Supervisors AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 28, 2000 SENATE BILL No. 1956 Introduced by Senator Polanco February 24, 2000 An act to add Article 9 (commencing with Section 53160) to Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Govermment Code,relating to water. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1956,as amended,Polanco. Water:biosolids. Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board or a California regional water quality control board to prescribe general waste discharge requirements for the discharge of dewatered, treated, or chemically fixed sewage sludge or other biological solids upon the receipt of a specified application, as prescribed. Existing law requires the state board and regional boards to replace individual waste discharge requirements with general waste discharge requirements for sewage sludge and other biological solids. This bill would prohibit a local government from enacting, maintaining, or enforcing an ordinance, regulation, or resolution that prescribes standards in addition to, or more restrictive than, certain federal regulations or general waste discharge requirements for biosolids land application adopted by the state board, but would authorize a local government to adopt standards in addition to, or more restrictive than, those certain federal regulations or general waste discharge requirements under specified circumstances. The bill would authorize any interested person to petition the state board for 98 r I SB 1956 review of the action of the local government, as prescribed. The bill would make related legislative findings and declarations govern on matters relating to-e feeyeling of bieselids. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: ne yes. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Article 9 (commencing with Section 2 53160) is added to Chapter I of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 3 5 of the Government Code,to read: 4 5 Article 9. Biosolids 6 7 53160. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all 8 of the following: 10 (a) In order to protect the quality of the waters of the 11 state, publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) have 12 been subjected to increasingly stringent regulations and 13 standards. POTWs have increased their level of 14 treatment to reduce discharge of conventional pollutants 15 and have adopted strict industrial source control 16 programs to limit the discharge of toxic materials to the 17 sewers. 18 (b) POTWs produce solid or semisolid residuals as a 19 result of wastewater treatment that must be disposed of, 20 reused on land, or incinerated. When these residuals have 21 low concentrations of pollutants and are treated to 22 reduce pathogens so that they may be safely recycled, 23 they are called biosolids. 24 (W 25 (c) The federal Environmental Protection Agency 26 conducted a comprehensive review of the risks associated 27 with the reuse of biosolids via application to the land and 28 established standards for reuse under Part 503 29 (commencing with Section 503.1 of Title 40 of the Code 30 of Federal Regulations. The National Research Council of 31 the National Academy of Sciences reviewed these 98 r -3— SB 1956 1 standards and judged them to be protective of human 2 health and the environment. 3 (d) This state declared in the California Integrated 4 Waste Management Act of 1989 (Division 30 5 (commencing with Section 40000) of the Public 6 Resources Code) its polley to maximi2e the recycling of 7 materials that might otherwise be disposed of in landfills. 8 Biosolids are a significant waste stream that, in the past, 9 generally have been disposed of in landfills. Recently, 10 since the adoption of standards to assure the safety of the 11 practice, biosolids have been increasingly recycled via 12 application to agricultural land. Continuation of this 13 recycling will preserve space in landfills for wastes that 14 cannot be recycled, and is important to the people of the 15 state. 16 (e) The State Water Resources Control Board is 17 preparing an environmental impact report for a 18 statewide general order for general waste discharge 19 requirements for the discharge of btosolids to land, for use 20 in agricultural, silvicultural, horticultural, and land 21 reclamation activities in this state. Through this process, 22 scientifically defensible standards will be established that 23 will address California§ unique circumstances, using a 24 uniform approach to the issues. 25 M A piecemeal approach to the regulation of biosolids 26 has been developing in this state, with some local 27 governments establishing prohibitively restrictive 28 requirements or bans on btosolids reuse. Other local 29 governments are under increasing pressure to follow suit 30 due to fear that biosolids will be forced into their 31 jurisdictions in a short time frame that is not conducive 32 to proper management and oversight. 33 (g) Promoting cooperation among local governments 34 on matters relating to the recycling of biosolids, 35 inherently involving the interaction of urban and rural 36 areas, as well as efforts that provide for the state's 37 wastewater treatment needs in an orderly fashion to 38 protect public health and the environment, are matters 39 of statewide concern. 99 SB 1956 —4— I 53161. (a) Except as spe©fied in subdivision (b), a 2 local government may not enact, maintain, or enforce an 3 ordinance, regulation, or resolution that prescribes 4 standards in addition to, or more restrictive than, Part 503 5 (commencing with Section 503.1) of Title 40 of the Code 6 of Federal Regulations or general waste discharge 7 requirements for bimolids land application adopted by 8 the State Water Resources Control Board. Nothing in this 9 section restricts the authority of a local government to 10 regulate land application of biasolids within the 11 jurisdiction of the Delta protection Commission. 12 (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local 13 government may enact an ordinance, regulation, or 14 resolution after a noticed public hearing prescribing 15 standards in addition to, or more restrictive than, those 16 standards contained in Part 503 (commencing with 17 Section 503.1) of 71de 40 of the Code of Federal 18 Regulations or general waste discharge requirements for 19 biasolids land application adopted by the State Water 20 Resources Control Board under either or both of the 21 following circumstances: 22 (1) The local government determines that the 23 operation of a biasolids land application site within that 24 local jurisdwaim will result in unreasonable adverse 25 effects on the environment or public health within the 26 local jurisdiction. The determination that unreasonable 27 adverse effects on the environment or public health will 28 exist shall be based on substantial peer-reviewed. 29 scientific evidence in the record of the proceedings, and 30 shall take into consideration spec populations whose 31 health may be adversely affected within the local 32 jurisdiction. 33 (2) The local government determines that the 34 operation of a biosoGds land application site within that 35 local jurisdiction has resulted or will result in the local 36 government being in violation of other applicable state or 37 federal laws. 38 (c) (1) mthin 30 days of the date of adoption by a 39 local government of any ordinance, regulation, or 40 resolution pursuant to this section, any interested person w r -5— SB 1956 1 may petition the State Water Resources Control Board for 2 review of the action of the local government. At the time 3 the petition is filed, the petitioner shall file with the local 4 government a request to prepare the record of 5 proceedings relating to the challenged action. 6 (2) The local government shall prepare, certify, and 7 submit the record to the State Water Resources Control - 8 Board within 60 days of the date of receipt of a request to 9 prepare the record and may recover from the petitioner 10 the reasonable cost of compiling the record. 11 (3) (A) The State Water Resources Control Board 12 shall conduct a hearing on a petition for review within 60 13 days following the date of certocation of the record by 14 the local government if9thin 30 days following the date 15 of the close of the hearing, the State Water Resources 16 Control Board shall issue a written decision on the 17 petition. 18 (B) The evidence before the State Water Resources 19 Control Board shall consist of the record before the local 20 government, and any other relevant evidence which, in 21 the judgment of the State Water Resources Control 22 Board, should be considered in determining tf the 23 requirements of subdivision (b)have been satisfied. 24 (C) If the State Water Resources Control Board finds 25 that the action of the local government is consistent with 26 the standards set forth in subdivision (b), it shall affirm 27 the action of the local government. 28 (D) If the State Water Resources Control Board finds 29 that the action of the local government is not consistent 30 with the standards set forth in subdivision (b), it shall 31 invalidate the action of the local government. 32 (4) The filing of a petition for review pursuant to 33 paragraph (1) shall stay the implementation of the local 34 government ordinance, regulation, or resolution until the 35 State Water Resources Control Board issues a written 36 decision pursuant to paragraph (3). 37 (5) Not later than 30 days from the date of service of 38 a copy of a decision issued by the State Water Resources 39 Control Board pursuant to paragraph (3), any aggrieved 99 SB 1956 —6- 1 parry may file with the superior court a petition for writ 2 ofmandatefor review thereof. 3 (6) Any interested person filing a petition with the 4 State Water Resources Control Board for review of an 5 ordinance, regulation. or - resolution pursuant to this 6 section shall reimburse the State Water Resources 7 Control Board for reasonable costs that the State Water 8 Resources Control Board actually incurs in performing 9 duties pursuant to this section. The amount of 10 reimbursement shall be equal to, but may not exceed, the 11 State Water Resources Control Boardk actual costs. An 12 invoice for reimbursement shall be submitted to the 13 person fling the petition subsequent to Issuance of the 14 written decision on the petition, specifying the hours 15 spent by State Water Resources Control Board staff, tasks 16 performed, and costs actually incurred. O 99 a DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 2000-5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 5, 2000, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Peer Swan, Vice Board Chair Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Don Bankhead Mike Moore, ECM Manager Peter Green Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Anna Piercy Simon Watson, O&M Maintenance Manager Margie Rice Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Maintenance Charles E. Sylvia Manager Paul Walker Ted Vitko, Associate Engineer II Dierdre Hunter, Senior Environmental Specialist Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Jan Debay, Board Chair Others Present: (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the March 1, 2000 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. 1 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 April 5, 2000 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair gave no report (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not in attendance. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles reported the Information Technology Department has begun work on a technology development utilization road map for the agency, which is an expansion on the strategic information plan that was developed in 1997. The plan outlines the technology direction that the agency will be going. Staff will be working on this through the end of the fiscal year and reporting back to the committee on this matter. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager, reported that staff is working on a report for the compressed natural gas fueling station for next month. Since December 1999 through March 2000,the station has had a 375% increase in sales. (10) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Mr. Ghirelli requested to schedule a tour of the laboratory prior to the May OMTS Committee meeting. He then reported on SB 1956, sponsored by Senator Polanco. This bill would prohibit local government from enacting or enforcing an ordinance that is more restrictive than either the Federal 503 regulations or any state requirements that may emerge that regulates biosolids unless local government can show there is a public health or environmental need. Staff will be requesting the Board at the April 261h meeting to consider adopting a resolution in support of SB1956. AB 1835, sponsored Assemblyman Baugh, would provide grants to local government for building runoff diversions into the sewer system. The City of Huntington Beach has taken the lead on this legislation and has asked for the District's support. A letter of support is being prepared for the General Manager's signature. Assemblyman Baugh has requested the District to provide him information on cost estimates for diverting the high-priority storm drains in the area. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. w Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 April 5, 2000 (12) ACTION ITEMS (Items a- b) a. OMTSOO-04: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy. Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, gave a brief presentation on the recommended policy for Dry Season Runoff Policy. Following discussion among the Directors, it was requested the proposed resolution be revised to delete any reference to significant commercial-industrial user. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly canted to approve staffs recommendation, as amended. It was further moved that the FAHR Committee review the fee structure for accepting urban runoff. b. OMTSOO-05: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-_, Declaring Support for Biosolids Application, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-03. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carved to approve staffs recommendation. (13) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-b) a. OMTSOO-06 Dairy Washwater Pilot Project Update Ted Vitko, Associate Engineer II, gave a brief update on the Dairy Washwater Pilot Project. b. OMTSOO-07 District Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) Update Simon Watson updated the Directors on DART's achievements to date. The Directors commended Simon on the achievements and presentation. (14) CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for May 3, 2000 at 5 p.m. A tour of the lab will precede the meeting. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 April 5, 2000 (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M e Operations, aintenan and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\wp.dta\agenda\OMTS\2000\Minutm\040500 Minutes.doc OMTSCOMMITTEE n nqo[ To9R.ofu 4/5/W 4/26/W AGENDA REPORT 1OG i N1 It m N Mbv OF4TS0 12(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager SUBJECT: POLICY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DRY WEATHER URBAN RUNOFF INTO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWERAGE SYSTEM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-04, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy. SUMMARY At the December 15, 1999 regular meeting, the Board of Directors approved the interim policy for acceptance of dry weather urban runoff into the Districts sewerage system. Staff has revised the interim policy to produce a permanent policy to handle dry weather runoff diversions to the District's sewerage system that will address regional needs while protecting the District's investment in improving the environment and its capital facilities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report on Proposed Policy for Acceptance of Dry Weather Urban Runoff into the Orange County Sanitation District Sewerage System. 2. Resolution No. OCSD OD-04, Establishing Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy 1�1W W1 .T R�1 .A R4>a.1Z.). March 27, 2000 STAFF REPORT POLICY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DRY SEASON URBAN RUNOFF INTO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWERAGE SYSTEM BACKGROUND Results of the Huntington Beach closure investigation suggested that the dry season urban runoff discharging to the Pacific Ocean through the Talbert Channel may have caused or contributed to the cause of the shoreline contamination that occurred in the summer of 1999. As a result, the District agreed to reroute the dry weather urban runoff from four pump stations in the City of Huntington Beach to the sewer system in August 1999. Historically, the District has managed its facilities to prevent the discharge of dry season urban runoff and storm water to the sewer system. Therefore, it has never been included in the Districts mission nor practice to accept discharge of this type of waste into the sewerage facilities. The events of last summer at Huntington Beach are leading us in a new direction. The District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations regulates all discharges into the District's sewerage facilities. These regulations do not currently include a provision to authorize any dry season urban runoff to the sewer system. On December 15, 1999, the Board of Directors approved an interim policy for acceptance and discharge of dry season urban runoff to the sewer system on a temporary basis. Since the adoption of the interim policy,the District has received requests from The Irvine Company and Hearthside Homes, Inc. to discharge dry season urban runoff to the sewer system from proposed housing developments in Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. These requests were prompted based on discharge requirements of the California Coastal Commission and Regional Water Quality Control Board due to potential water quality impacts and beach closures that could result from the direct discharge of this runoff. Since the District's interim policy was adopted for a period of only one year, regulatory agencies questioned the developers about the time period during which the District would accept the dry season urban runoff. The California Coastal Commission has indicated that without a permanent policy in place to accept the dry season urban runoff in lieu of direct discharge into the ocean, permission to construct will not be granted. Based on the available testing results and information, the bacteria counts in dry season urban runoff have the potential to exceed Ocean Water Protection Standards by 10-20 times. The total dry season urban runoff from each developer is estimated at 0.1 million gallons per day(MGD), and the levels of known toxics such as heavy metals are similar to those found in domestic sewage. Moreover, the bacteria counts in the runoff are significantly lower than the typical influent bacteria counts we now receive in the District's influent. District's staff proposes to revise the interim policy and establish a long-term resolution for disposal of dry season urban runoff to the sewer system because: 1)the acceptance of the dry season urban runoff is fundamentally appropriate to minimize the possible adverse environmental impact, and 2)there is an immediate need to adopt a long-term policy to accommodate the public needs. Policy for Acceptance of Dry Weather Urban Runoff o Page 2 of 3 March 27, 2000 r OTHER AGENCIES' PRACTICES The District has contacted six neighboring wastewater agencies to research their practice of accepting urban runoff discharges to their sewer facilities. Based on the information obtained, none of the agencies has established any written policy, fees or characteristic requirements regarding dry season urban runoff. They are accepting urban runoff or storm water when it is contaminated, on an occasional, case-by-case basis. The City of Los Angeles is already accepting dry season urban runoff from two areas (Malibu and Santa Monica)without any policy, discharge requirements or fees in place. PROPOSED POLICY The District's staff believes that the acceptance of the dry season urban runoff to the sewer system will reduce the levels of contaminants along the Southern California shoreline and enhance public health and environmental quality. The revised policy includes many of the same provisions contained in the interim policy and new provisions to protect the District's primary function of collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer discharges to the sewer system. Under the proposed policy, the District will only accept certain types of dry season urban runoff during the period of April 15 to October 31 of each year. In summary, the proposed policy includes the following provisions to: • Require the applicant to exclude storm runoff during wet weather events; • Require the applicant to evaluate other disposal options and implement pollution prevention measures; • Require the applicant to guarantee that the District receives payment of all monies due for the collection, treatment and disposal of dry season urban runoff; • Authorize staff to deny the request and to not issue a discharge permit if such issuance adversely affects the District's operations; • Require the applicant to indemnify and hold the District harmless from all liabilities; and • Authorize staff to take enforcement actions, including termination of the discharge if full compliance with the conditions of the District's Ordinance and discharge permit are not met. CONCERNS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED POLICY Although the proposed policy contains provisions to protect the District's operations and enable the District to ensure compliance with all the regulatory requirements, there are concerns the staff has encountered which, due to lack of information at this time, cannot be fully addressed. • Concern: The types and levels of all pollutants of concern such as pesticides contained in urban run off are unknown at this time. Therefore, the possible impact of accepting the dry season urban runoff discharge to sewer and on the District's effluent is not fully known. Response: There are provisions in the proposed policy to require the discharger to periodically monitor its discharge into the sewer system and to take corrective measures to control or eliminate the pollutants of concern or to reduce the loading to the sewer system. The proposed policy also includes provisions authorizing staff to take enforcement actions including termination of the discharge. Policy for Acceptance of Dry Weather Urban Runoff Page 3 of 3 March 27, 2000 • Concern: At this time, the District cannot accurately project the future collective volume of the dry season urban runoff discharges to the sewer system. The District also has limited existing and future system capacity in the collection, treatment and disposal facilities. Therefore, depending upon the future collective volume of these types of discharges, the District may not have an adequate system capacity to accommodate the future volume of the urban runoff discharged to the District's sewerage facilities without substantial expansion of sewerage facilities. Response: Today, the estimated total flow from Huntington Beach and the two developers is about 1.2 MGD. Future runoff volume may increase to 10 MGD from the potential applicants in the District's jurisdiction. This volume is about 4 percent of the District's total influent of 245 MGD. The District believes that there is adequate overall system capacity to accommodate this volume. Moreover,there are provisions in the proposed policy to require the discharger to implement pollution prevention including recycling, reuse and reduction in the volume of the discharge. In addition, the proposed policy authorizes the staff to deny the issuance of a permit and terminate the discharge or require additional waste management facilities to be installed by the discharger if the discharge threatens to adversely impact the District's facilities. FUTURE MANAGEMENT OF THE POLICY If this policy is adopted, to ensure that there would not be any recognizable adverse impact on the District's sewerage facilities, staff will commence close monitoring of the urban runoff discharges to the sewer system and accumulate quality and quantity data currently not available. After sufficient information is obtained over the next few years, staff will revisit the provisions of the policy and will recommend necessary adjustments to conform to the findings. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the attached Resolution No. OCSD 00-_ which includes the proposed Policy for Acceptance of Dry Season Urban Runoff Into the Orange County Sanitation District Sewerage System. If the Board of Directors adopts this policy, staff further recommends that the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations,which is currently under review by staff, include in the next revision the elements of the policy adopted by the Board of Directors. MTL:lm H:\w0.dte\ts\3590\1a1ebMgenda for runoff.dm RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-04 ESTABLISHING DRY SEASON URBAN RUNOFF POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING DRY SEASON URBAN RUNOFF POLICY WHEREAS, certain types of dry season urban runoff create public health and/or environmental problems which are infeasible to economically or practically control, and, WHEREAS, THE Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has available limited system capacity in its collection, treatment and disposal facilities which may allow the District to accept certain dry season urban runoff discharges without adversely affecting the District's primary function of collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer discharges; and WHEREAS, the District does not have system capacity available to allow wet season discharges to the District's facilities; and WHEREAS, District has developed a Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy to address certain environmental concerns associated with dry season runoff; and, WHEREAS, District may accept dry season urban runoff, on a permanent basis, provided that the discharge occurs in full and complete compliance with the terms of the District's Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the following Dry Season Urban Runoff Policy is established as a District Policy: POLICY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DRY SEASON URBAN RUNOFF INTO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWERAGE SYSTEM The Orange County Sanitation District ("District") may accept surface urban runoff into the sewerage system only during the period of April 15 through October 31 of each year ("dry season urban runoff) and only if the following requirements are met: r wo��2oaoea A. Requirements for Obtaining Permission to Discharge 1. The dry season urban runoff diversion to the sewerage system shall address a public health or environmental problem associated with the runoff discharge that cannot be otherwise economically or practically controlled; 2. The dry season urban runoff diversion structure shall be designed and other necessary provisions shall be implemented to exclude storm runoff during wet weather. The diversion structure shall be equipped with a lockable shutoff device, satisfactory to the District, and to which the District shall be provided access at all times; 3. The permit applicant shall consider and evaluate the feasibility of other disposal alternatives (i.e., discharging into storm drains, reuse and reclamation of the runoff, etc.) for the discharge of the dry season urban runoff. The permit applicant shall submit to the District a report, satisfactory to the District describing the evaluation of each disposal alternative, and demonstrating why each alternative is not economically or practically feasible to dispose of the proposed dry season urban runoff in lieu of sewer discharge; 4. The permit applicant's proposed diversion system shall prevent debris or any other pollutants of concern from entering the District's sewerage system. The permit applicant shall submit design drawings and an operations and maintenance plan for the proposed dry season diversion structure which shall be sufficient to establish that all District requirements will be met to prevent pass through of and/or interference with the District's sewerage facilities. The diversion system shall be capable of measuring and recording on a daily basis the flow discharged to the sewerage system; 5. The permit applicant shall submit best management practices and pollution prevention strategies designed to minimize or eliminate dry season urban runoff. More stringent practices and strategies may be required depending on the nature of the anticipated discharge; 6. The permit applicant shall submit to the District a proposed method to guarantee the existence of an enforceable mechanism to ensure that the District receives payment for all monies due pursuant to this policy for as long as the permit exists. No permit application shall be complete without such an enforceable mechanism, satisfactory to the District in its sole discretion. This mechanism shall be designed to limit any administrative burden on the District; 7. The General Manager, or his designee, may impose additional requirements as may be appropriate to reduce the burden on the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; a. Collection, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer discharges remain the unorm�mwea z OMTS COMMITTEE HeTngMe TOBld r. 5,0 9/7s/Og AGENDA REPORT OMTsoo WO Iem Numbe os u(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Michael D. Moore Manager ECM SUBJECT: Resolution for Biosolids Recycling GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-05, Declaring Support for Biosolids Recycling, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-03. SUMMARY Staff is requesting that the Board adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-05, Declaring Support for Biosolids Recycling, and repeal Resolution No. OCSD 99-03. The new resolution will state the District's intent to use compost made from District biosolids at its facilities and to encourage its member cities and agencies to do the same. Resolution No. OCSD 99-03 emphasized the District's support for the recycling of biosolids. The proposed revision takes that support one step further to state that compost products made from biosolids produced in Orange County will be used in Orange County. A copy of the proposed resolution with the new added language is attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS Proposed Resolution HM .ftAagendaWca,dAgenda Re,cns�Bnro Agenda Rap, WCftem 120)dot Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-05 SUPPORTING BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IN SUPPORT OF BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 99-03 WHEREAS, biosolids are the residual product of municipal wastewater processing which have been extensively and properly treated so that they may be safely recycled to amend soil rather than take up limited landfill space; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("District°) produces biosolids at its two wastewater treatment plants; and WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has adopted detailed and scientifically sound rules regulafing the production and use of biosolids [40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (Part 503 Rule)]. These Regulations assure the safe and beneficial use of biosolids when properly managed in accordance with the rules; and WHEREAS, the District supports and implements the biosolids management practices found in the California Water Environmental Association's ("CWEA") Manual of Good Practice for Agricultural Land Application of Biosolids, in order to promote a standard of excellence for applying biosolids to agricultural land, and to assure for the proper oversight of this practice; and WHEREAS, the application of high quality biosolids on nonfood products is safe, provides beneficial nutrients to the soil when applied at agronomic rates, and is consistent with the environmental application of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on agricultural lands, and WHEREAS, it is the law of the State of California that municipalities divert recyclable materials from disposal in landfills in order to achieve a 50% waste diversion by Year 2000 (Assembly Bill 939); and WHEREAS, in order to maintain the highest quality biosolids for beneficial use, the District maintains a comprehensive Industrial Waste Pretreatment and Source Control Program, which has received the United States Environmental Protection Agency's award for excellence, and 1 I WHEREAS, the District maintains a diverse program of biosolids management, including the application to nontable-food crop agricultural land in Southern California, consistent with the District's mission to protect public health and the environment through excellence in wastewater systems; and WHEREAS, the District desires to promote the continuance of the recycling of biosolids to nontable-food crop agricultural land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and is sensitive to the needs of the communities involved. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: The District declares its full support for the recycling of biosolids. Section 2: The District will use on its site, and encourage its Member Agencies to use at their facilities, compost made using District biosolids. Section 3: The District supports the proper management and oversight of this practice in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Part 503 Rule and the CWEA Manual of Good Practice. Section 4: Resolution No. OCSD 99-03 is hereby repealed. Section 5: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on the 26th day of April, 2000. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary H:Nwp.Aa�admIMBSURa lubonsU WO"S.dw 2 e DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTIO COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, April 6, 2000, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday,April 6, 1999, at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMnTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Directorof Engineering Norm Eckenrode,Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Steve Anderson John Linder, Construction Manager Guy Carrozzo Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Lynn Daucher Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Brian Donahue, Vice Chair Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Gerald Sigler John Swindler, IT Manager Russell Patterson Peter Hass, Programmer Jan Debay, Board Chair Dennis May, Project Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jon Thomsic, Project Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Directors Absent: Terri Josway, Safety Manager Christina Shea Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: John Cavanaugh, Counsel Dennis Kasper, Parsons-Engineering Science (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 April 6, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the March 2, 2000 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering did not make a report. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel representative John Cavanaugh did not make a report. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Mr. Ludwin reviewed the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over 5%. (11) PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Mr. Ludwin reported that there were no PSAs and two addenda approved by the General Manager from February 24 through March 29, 2000. (12) FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Mr. Ludwin reviewed the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. (13) QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT Mr. Ludwin reviewed the Contract Staffing Assignments Report. Two corrections in the project amounts were identified. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 April 6, 2000 (14) GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Mr. Ludwin provided a status report on the work In progress. Demonstration projects are underway on several microfiltration processes. The results will be evaluated and could be used in the design of the project. The structure of the Joint Coordination Committee was changed to include three active directors and three alternate directors from each agency. The general managers will no longer be Included as committee members. The project is on schedule. Dr. Greg Leslie,the OCW D Senior Engineer on the project, will be returning to his native Australia. Final approval on the project is scheduled for January 2001. (15) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-j) a. PDC00-23 (1)Approve a budget amendment Increase of$84,931 to Plant 1 Headworks No.2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of$2,166,205; (2) Ratify Change Order No.4 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade,Job No. J-31-3,with Systems Integrated, authorizing an addition of$1,034 and 69 calendar days, Increasing the total contract amount to$717,866; (3) Accept Plant No. 1 Headworks No.2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend approval. b. PDC00-24 Ratify Change Order No.4 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc. authorizing an addition of$130,622 and 26 calendar days, Increasing the total contract amount to$8,593,409. Director Anderson expressed concern about the quality of the field verification work. John Linder and Chuck Winsor reviewed the steps that are usually taken to avoid as many interferences as possible during the design phase and before construction, including job walks by OCSD staff. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to approve. C. PDC00.25 Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L. M, N and O at Plant No.2, Job No. 122-39,with Margate Construction,for an addition of$552,000, increasing the total contract amount to$10,057,256. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. PDC Committee Minutes " Page 4 April 6, 2000 d. PDC00-26 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for on-call computer services necessary to update and maintain computer models developed under the 1999 Strategic Plan, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. e. PDCOO.27 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for design and study of Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No.J-67, for a total amount not to exceed $283,280. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. I. PDC00-28 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4, for an amount not to exceed$845,300. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. g. PDC00-29 Approve Professional Services Agreement with CGVL Engineers for professional engineering services for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment,Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $308,212; and (2)Approve a budget amendment of $2,594,000 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82,for a total project budget of$3,394,000. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. h. PDC00-30 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements, Contract No. 2-50, for a total amount not to exceed$504,685. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. 1. PDC00-31 Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C. (CFI)for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, providing additional consulting services in the amount of$459,703 for a total amount not to exceed$2,788,384. Director Patterson asked staff to consider different evaluation processes on future jobs to ensure that one member of an interview panel does not skew the results. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 April 6, 2000 j. PDC00-32 Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Plant Automation & Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$420,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$5,516,830. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval. (16) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS(items a-b) a. PDC00.33 John Cavanaugh, General Counsel's office, reported from the legal perspective how liquidated damages are established for construction contracts. The philosophy and rationale behind determining the amount were described. Before determining or assessing liquidated damages, each project Is evaluated individually; cities are requested to help determine their costs in the event of a delay; all parties involved in a project are considered; as well as how the contractor performed the work. Mr. Cavanaugh will provide Director Anderson with examples of case law cited in the agenda report. b. PDCOO-34 Terri Josway, Safety Manager, provided a status report on the Interim Administrative Control Plan for Hazardous Location Classification Project, Job No. J-35. The elements of the plan and training needs were discussed. Field audits will be performed by Safety staff to ensure compliance. Staff was directed to document the meeting with the insurance carder. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Anderson suggested that for future projects in the collection system staff consider contacting cities, communication and utility companies to see it conduits for future use could be installed in the same trench during construction. This might prevent future disruptions in the same area and avoid some of the undisclosed utility problems that are constantly encountered by contractors. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 April 6, 2000 (20) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (21) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000 at 5 p.m. A tour of several of the proposed projects at Plant 2 will precede the meeting. (22) ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Submitted by. ,• l �-- a-6�J y4R n Tappan P C Committee Secretary H�RpM<OP�>�PD4V WM9nuMablOBW PX W WMn PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dote To ads. 4u6-00 426-0O AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number • �23 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE, JOB NO. J-31-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment increase of$84,931 to Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, for a total revised project budget of $2,166,205; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated authorizing an addition of $1,034 and 69 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $717,866; and (3) Accept Plant No. 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3, with Systems Integrated as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Change Order No. 4 includes three items for Job No. J-31-3. Items 1 and 2 are design changes. Item 3 is a final resolution of contract disputes. There is a 69 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The budget for this job increased from $2,081,274 to $2,166,205 to provide additional funds for programming, staff support, and the change order. Contract Date December 16, 1997 Original Contract Completion Date October 11, 1998 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date January 19, 2000 Projected Completion Date March 28, 2000 Projected Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 694,000 Previous Authorized Change $ 22,832 This Change Order (add) $ 1,034 Change Orders to Date $ 23,866 Percentage Increase 3.44% Amended Contract Price $ 717,866 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.(Line nem:la, not in this FY Budget) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The costs for the construction contract task have exceeded the current budget. Programming being performed by District staff is only partially complete. The program currently provides for remote operation of the Headworks equipment. However, the completed program will also automate the flow of raw sewage through the Headworks. The construction contract is complete. Staff will complete the programming and perform the related start up testing at a later date. Additional Construction Staff funds are being requested to finish this work. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, consists of the installation of new controls and control panels necessary to implement a new Headworks process control and monitoring computer system at Plant No. 1. The plans and specifications for this contract were prepared by CH2M Hill Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Systems Integrated in July 1998. The job is complete. The following table summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Start Up Assistance $4,034 0 Other 2 Credit for Coupling Install. $ 3,000 0 Other 3 Resolve Contract Time $0 69 Other Total $1,034.00 69 These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order TH:k BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE JOB NO. J-31-3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTfTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development Design Staff $ 43.320 $ 43.320 $ 43.320 $ 43.320 $ 43,320 $ 43.320 100% Consultant PSA $ 343,130 $ 343,130 $ 343.130 $ 343.130 $ 343.130 $ 343.130 100% Construction Contract $ 694,000 $ 716.832 $ 1.034 $ 717.866 $ 716,832 $ 1,034 $ 717,868 $ 701,976 98% Construction(Other) Construction Staff $ 367,550 $ 977.992 $ 83,897 $ 1,061,889 $ 977,992 $ 83,897 $ 1.061.889 $ 876.389 83% Contingency $ 98.000 $ TOTAL $ 1.546.000 $ 2,081,274 $ 84,931 $ 2.166.205 $ 2,081.274 $ 84.931 $ 2.166.205 $ 1,964.815 91% J-313 C04 8Wge1 TsWe.Revised 0312H2Ogd C � CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE JOB NO. J-31.3 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 12/16/1997 $ 694,000.00 $ 694.000.00 300 300 CO NO. 1' 03/04/1999 $ (354.00) $ 693,646.00 (0.02) 127 427 CO NO, 2' 0 8104/1 9 9 9 $ 2,912.00 $ 696,558.00 0.40 0 427 CO NO. 3-1 02/23/2000 1 $ 20,274.00 1 $ 716,832.00 1 3.29 339 766 CO NO.4 1 Pending $ 1,034.00 Is 717,866.00 3.44 69 835 -Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99.23 "Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99.23 J313,COSTAT C04 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927288127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Systems Integrated C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: Apol 26, 2000 Job: Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control Systems Upgrade Job No. J-31-3 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $ 1,034.00 In accordance with contract provis"ons, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1—FLOW METER START UP ASSISTANCE This item is for additional costs to provide a Sow meter manufacturer technician to diagnose and troubleshoot Sow meter transmitter signal noise that was experienced during start up tests. The source of the signal noise was found to be from existing equipment inside the plant. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,034.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—CREDIT FOR COUPLING INSTALLATION This item is a credit for installation costs for fifteen flexible shaft coupling that are part of the Splitter Box Weir Gale Assemblies. Thes. Couplings were not installed within the alignment tolerances defined by the flexible coupling manufacturer. The gate actuator subcontractor asserted that the alignment of the couplings was suitable for the application. This credit is for the installation cost of the couplings installed out of the manufacturer's allowable tolerances. The alignment of the couplings will be corrected on a separate contract. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 of the General Provisions. (FCO J313-36) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 d ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Systems Integrated _ C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control Systems Upgrade, Job No.J-31-3 ITEM 3— RESOLUTION OF CONTRACT TIME This is a no cost Rem extending the Final Contract Completion Due Date to March 24, 2000. The contract completion has been extended by concurrent Contractor and District delays. District computer programming, submittal reviews, and staffing shortages have caused delays. Contractor performance on installation of splitter box actuators and submittal of correct loop drawings has also contributed to the delay. There are no liquidated damages or Contractor Extended overhead charges associated with this time extension. The Contract Warranty Period is also cancelled as part of this agreement. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 69 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $1,034.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 69 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Systems Integrated C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control Systems Upgrade Job No J-31-3 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 69 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: December 16, 1997 Original Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 11, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 69 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 535 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 835 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 28, 2000 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: March 28, 2000 Original Contract Price $ 694,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 22,832.00 This Change (Add) (8eduet) $ 1,034.00 Amended Contract Price $717,866.00 Page 4 of 4 Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Systems Integrated C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Plant 1 Headworks No, 2 Control Systems Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3 Board Approval Date:April 26, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Systems Integrated Contractor Date H:1 P.fta engUOBS&CONTRACTSU-3131C04.. o PDC COMMITTEE M Ong � I To Bd.of fir. _ alb/a0 M76/oo AGENDA REPORT 10vinNuin teniNin°' vomda4 iMr Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1, CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 GENERAL MANAGERS RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1, with Fleming Engineering, Inc., authorizing an addition of $130,622 and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,593,409. SUMMARY Change Order No. 4 includes nine items of added work to Contract No. 3-38-1. Items 1 through 6, and 8 and 9 are changed conditions. Item 7 is a design change. There is a 26 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages are $750 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date May 18, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date November 27, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date January 3, 2001 Projected Completion Date January 4, 2001 Projected Days Subject To Liquidated Damages N/A Projected Liquidated Damage Assessment N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.D0 Previously Authorized Changes $ 96,991.00 This Change (Add) $ 130,622.00 Change Orders To Date $ 229,613.00 Percentage Increase To Date 2.75% Amended Contract Price $ 8,593,409.00 \YMMWWIM9CbWM�' ,E KabP�h1RON BmN/OMAM�WRbICQX�n t�(E�.J01 ate.. move Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT r ® This item has been budgeted. (CiP: section a-Page 27) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The contingency fund of the project budget will provide for the increased construction contract costs and design support costs. Refer to the budget information table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 3-38-1, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1, includes the installation of 15,933 feet of sewer pipe, manholes, and appurtenant facilities in the City of Buena Park, and along the CALTRANS right-of-away in Beach Boulevard. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Fleming Engineering, Inc. on May 16, 1999. The contract is 41% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 4 Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Relocation of PacBell cable $ 1,224 0 Changed Condition 2 Water valve vault interference 3,185 1 Changed Condition 3 Design profile conflict with sewer 50,409 10 Changed laterals along Kingman Avenue Condition 4 Remove, bypass and reconnect 724 0 Changed existing 6-inch VCP sewer lateral Condition 5 Repair and cleanup of worksite at 3,363 1 Changed Dodds Avenue Condition 6 Trench cave-ins along Artesia 15,972 0 Changed Boulevard Condition 7 Traffic Control modifications at La 4,787 0 Design Change Mirada Boulevard and Beach Boulevard 8 Additional potholing and downtime 10,338 4 Changed for utility elevation verification Condition 9 Addition of a 96-inch manhole at 40,620 10 Changed Station 49+06 1Condition Total Change Order No. 4 1 $130,622 26 wamm.on y dm`+dme.�o.m 1.1d. Ae,nd.RepodCMpMen 1�(d)da R,wd. Page 2 V ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1998, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order No. 4 BP:ba:lc 1YetlmWemlMy.�Age RKah B W APMQ Re�`➢9COlbm 1NC1.ticl w ermAe Page 3 R BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 20,000 $ 11000 $ 1,019 $ 2.019 $ 1,000 $ 1,019 $ 2,019 $ 2,019 100% Design Staff $ 153.000 $ 300,000 $ 24,070 $ 324,070 $ 300,000 $ 24,070 $ 324,070 $ 324,070 100% Consultant PSA $ 300,000 $ 171,500 $ 171,500 $ 171,500 $ 171,500 $ 74,230 43°% Construction Contract $ 4,308,000 $ 8,462,787 $ 130.622 $ 8,693,409 $ 8,462,787 $ 130,622 $ 8,593,409 $ 3,703,275 43% Construction(Other) $ 30,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Construction Staff $ 200.000 $ 1,468,900 $ 1,468,900 $ 1,468,900 $ 1,468,900 $ 339,466 23% Contingency $ 914,000 $ 1,035,088 $ (155.711) $ 879,377 $ TOTAL $ 5,925.000 $ 11,439.275 $ - $ 11.439.275 $ 10,404,187 $ 155,711 $ 10,569,898 $ 4,443,060 42% Budget Tame C0#4 C CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 1 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM APPROVAL COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 05/18/1999 $ 8,363,796.00 $ 8.363.796.00 580 560 CO NO. 1' 1020/1999 $ 21,475.00 $ 8,385,271.00 0.26 0 560 CO.NO.2' 1220/1999 $ 46,685.00 $ 8,431,956.00 0.81 7 567 CO. NO.3' 01262000 Is 30,831.00 1 $ 8,462,787.00 1.18 4 571 CO.NO.41 Pending 1 $ 130.622.00 1 $ 8,593,409.00 2.75 26 597 -Approved by GM per delegated authority cy Board Resolution 99-23 chngstat.c04 y Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Enaineerina, Inc. C.O No. Four(4) Date: April 26. 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Amount of this Change Order (Add) $130,622.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —RELOCATION OF PACIFIC BELL (PACBELL) CABLE This item is for delay costs associated with the excavation and relocation of a PacBell cable at a bore pit. An existing PacBell cable interfered with the layout and construction of a bore pit at Station No. 43+60, located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Dodds Avenue. The contract drawings showed this cable at a location, which would not require the cable to be relocated. The Contractor incurred extra costs for delays to trace and verify the utility. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,224.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—WATER VALVE VAULT INTERFERENCE This item is for labor and equipment costs necessary to remove the interfering portion of an existing water valve vault structure located at Station No. 41+50 on Tulare Street. The contract drawings, which were based on water agency as—builts, did not show any conflict. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,185.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE OVER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Fleming Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Four(41 Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Reach 1, Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Bovle Engineering ITEM 3—DESIGN PROFILE CONFLICT WITH SEWER LATERALS ALONG KINGMAN AVENUE This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to reconnect 12 sewer house laterals along Kingman Avenue. The location of the existing sewer house laterals was in conflict with the profile of the new trunk sewer. As a result, the elevation of the laterals had to be raised to accommodate the installation of the new sewer. The change in condition consisted of three types of work elements: (1) Delay time for labor and equipment required for the removal of concrete encased laterals; (2) Reconstruction and reconnection of laterals outside the trench limits, including re-encasement of the 4-inch laterals over the new 39-inch sewer and into the adjacent 8-inch sewer line trench; and (3) Restoration work on private property (e.g., re-planting, replacement of concrete driveways, etc.). The contact drawings did not require the reconstruction and reconnection of the laterals beyond the trench excavation limits. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 50,409.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days ITEM 4— REMOVE, BYPASS, AND RECONNECT EXISTING 6-INCH VCP SEWER LATERAL This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to remove and reconnect an existing 6-inch VCP service lateral to an existing 8-inch VCP wye connection. This connection was located adjacent to a new manhole at Station No. 47+60. The existing 6-inch service lateral was not shown on the contract plans and service had to be maintained. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 12). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 724.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 4 Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Fleming Engineering Inc. C.O No. Four(4) Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering ITEM 5 - REPAIR AND CLEANUP OF WORK SITE AT DODDS AVENUE This item is for labor, equipment, and materials to remove mud and debris from inside the new 39-inch trunk sewer and from manhole excavation area. An existing 6-inch fire hydrant lateral located outside the Contractor's trench limits (Station No. 44+20) ruptured overnight causing extensive flooding. This work was accomplished by Contractors farce account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 7). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,363.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days ITEM 6—TRENCH CAVE-INS ALONG ARTESIA BLVD. This item is for additional materials (e.g., 1.5 sack slurry, base and cap paving) and haul or dumping charges required to backfill an area outside the trench for the new 39-inch trunk sewer. During construction of the new sewer line in Artesia Boulevard (Station Nos. 3+25 to 6+00, 8+50 to 8+80, 10+25 to 10+75, and 11+30 to 12+00) the north side of the trench had numerous cave-ins attributed to a poorly compacted existing parallel 10-inch trunk sewer trench, located three to four feel outside the new trench zone. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Impact Notice No. 2). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,972.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—TRAFFIC CONTROL MODIFICATONS AT LA MIRADA BLVD. AND BEACH BLVD. This item is for labor, material, and equipment necessary to modify the traffic control configuration and to set up a traffic detour for the boring operation at the intersection of LaMirada Boulevard and Beach Boulevard. Due to the space limitations caused by the proximity of an existing parallel trunk sewer, the bore and receiving pit locations as shown on the contract drawing had to be reversed. The Eyisting sewer line was found to be closer to the new sewer location than shown on the drawings. As a result the traffic control plans had to be changed to accommodate revised traffic flow patterns and to provide sufficient working space. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Previsions. (Reference FCO No. 13 and Plan Change No. 5). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,787.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor Fleming Engineering Inc. C.O No. Four(4) Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System. Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering ITEM 8—ADDITIONAL POTHOLING AND DOWN TIME FOR UTILITY ELEVATION VERIFICATION This item is for delays and extra costs associated with the verification of the depth of two existing gas line crossings. The State of California, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, stopped the boring operation between Station Nos. 50+81 to 1+57 near Stage Road and Beach Boulevard until the elevation of the two existing gas line crossings could be confirmed. The extra work consisted of four days of standby time for the boring subcontractor and additional labor and equipment to locate the gas line(s). The elevation of the gas line crossings in the design drawings could not be verified by the Gas Company's as-built records. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 6). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,338.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 9—ADDITION OF 96-INCH MANHOLE AT STATION 49+06 This item is for labor, material and equipment required to construct a non-standard 96-inch manhole on the new trunk sewer at the cross-over point with existing parallel District sewers at Station 49+06. One of the existing sewers interfered with the installation of the new line. The work consisted of the construction of a special manhole base to allow the crossing of the new and existing sewers, the installation of the manhole shaft, installation of temporary flow diversions, maintenance of the flow diversion facilities, and traffic control. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH No. 2). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 40,620.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 130,622.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 26 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Flemina Engineering, Inc. C.O No. Four(4) Date: April 26. 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 26 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: May 18, 1999 Original Contract Time: 560 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 27 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 26 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 37 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 597 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Data: January 3, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damage:: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 8,363,796.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 98,991.00 This Change (Add) (PedwGt) $ 130,622.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,593,409.OD Page 6 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92723-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Flemina Enaineerina. Inc. C.O No. Four f41 Date: April 26. 2000 Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 1. Contract No. 3-38-1 Consultant Boyle Enaineerina Board Acceptance Date: April 26, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT R m ended byj 52. -00 onstruction Manager Date App6�,rofTnagmee g Date Accepted by: FLEMING ENGINEERING, INC. 00 Contractor D to PDC COMMITTEE McWng Drt rnB Dr. 4/6/00 4/26/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number VDN0.25 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABLITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L. M, N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K. L, M. N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, for an addition of$552,000, increasing the total contract amount to $10,057,256. SUMMARY Change Order No. 2 includes one item of added work to Job No. P2-39. There are no errors or omissions associated with this Change Order. There is no time extension associated with this Change Order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Start Date October 26, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 24, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date January 4, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject To Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ (142,344.00) This Change $ 552,000.00 Change Orders to Date $ 409.656.00 Percentage Increase to Date $ 4.25% Amended Contract Price $ 10,057,256.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section e. Page se) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H:bvp.ftWWMO& WAps ReMftN BUN Ape,4e RepxhpMW.bT tale). RSAeg9 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P2-39 includes the rehabilitation of seven digesters at Plant No. 2. The rehabilitation includes cleaning accumulated grit from digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heat loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester's domes, and upgrading digester control systems. Lee and Ro, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. on August 25, 1999. The contract is 15% complete. The following summarizes Change Order No. 2. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Digester Cleaning and $552,000 0 Design Change Biosolids Disposal Total —Change Order No. 2 $652 000 0 Item No. 1 includes additional work for the Contractor to take responsibility of the disposal of biosolids from the seven digesters being cleaned and rehabilitated under this contract. The contract documents required the contractor to clean the digesters, move the contents to the drying beds, and allow the biosolids to dry. After the biosolids were dried, the District under a separate contract would haul and dispose the biosolids. On August 25, 1999, staff obtained authorization from the Board for$663,180 to haul and dispose the dried biosolids obtained during the cleaning process. After this contract was awarded, the Contractor, Margate Construction, submitted a cost savings proposal for cleaning the digesters and disposing of the biosolids. The Contractor proposed prescreening the biosolids to a quality acceptable for land application in lieu of the District hauling the material to a landfill. The details of the proposal are as follows: • In addition to cleaning the digesters, the Contractor would also prescreen the biosolids and dispose of the material off site by a land application method. The proposal includes compensation to the Contractor in the amount of$104,000 per digester(total of$728,000.00 for seven digesters). This additional cost would also include the disposal of all plastics and grit obtained during the prescreening process. • The engineer's estimate is 2000 tons of biosolids per digester. For quantities over 2000 tons of biosolids, per digester, the cost of disposal would be an additional $52 per ton and would be included in a future Change Order. • The Contractor would perform tests on the dried biosolids prior to hauling to ensure that they are suitable for land application. Staff evaluated the Contractor's proposal and determined that land application of biosolids is a more cost-effective method of disposing biosolids than landfill disposal, even considering the additional costs associated with prescreening. Several samples were obtained from the District's digesters and laboratory tests concluded that the NMPft% nga WAp R•pnhl B Wft.M RepwbNlO011sn 13(s1 ft R^va°'"Op Page 2 - screened material was suitable for land application. The net savings to the project, based on 14,000 tons, are shown below. e Project Budget $839,180• $59.94/ton Contractor's Proposal $728.000 $52.00/ton Net Savings $111,180 *$839,180 includes $663,180 for hauling and disposal under a separate contract and $176,000 for bid items 4 and 5. Bid items 4 and 5 are labor and material costs for cleaning digesters. Total cost for disposal of biosolids per the contractors proposal $728,000 Deletion of bid items 4 & 5 $176,000 Net Change Order amount $552,000 ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District's Guidelines, Section 15301(B). The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 2 H Mq ftWpnW MAgm Rryw4\ B MHO R�biW➢em IXO)," n�a Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ Design Staff $ 130,000 $ 343,800 $ 343,800 $ 343,800 $ 343.800 $ 343,800 100% Consultant PSA $ 1,045,000 1 $ 1,210.000 $ 1,210,000 $ 854,810 $ 854,810 $ 335,383 39% Construction Contract $ 9.875,000 $ 14,713,020 E - $ 14,713,020 $ 9,505.256 $ 562.000 It 10.057.256 $ 1,445,796 14% Construction(Other) $ - $ 23.300 $ 23,300 Hauling and Disposal $ 663,180 $ - $ 663,180 $ 603,180 $ (663.180 Construction Staff $ 50,000 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 1,636,600 $ 174,613 11% Contingency $ 3.468,600 $ 3.468.600 TOTAL $ 11.100,000 $ 22,068,500 $ - $ 22,058,500 $ 13,003,646 $ (111,180) $ 12.892,466 $ 2,299,592 189/6 " On 8125/99 Board authorized $663,180 for biosolids hauling and disposal costs h:lwp.dtebng9obsendwntm0s%P2-3fthangeoNers\Co2 bit CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 Job Number P2-39 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 0812511999 $ 9,647,600 $ 9,647,600 730 730 CO NO. 1' 04/0 312 0 0 0 $ (142,344) $ 9,505,256 -1.48% 72 802 CO NO. 2 1 04/26/2000 $ 552,000 $ 10,057,256 5.72a/ 0 802 -Approval by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 Hiwpdta`engyobsondcontraclsW2-39\CO2 Statue Report V Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I J. K. L M. N and O at Plant No 2 Job Number P2-39 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $552,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — DIGESTER CLEANING AND BIOSOLIDS DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVE This item is for extra work associated with the cleaning of seven digesters (I, J, K, L, M, N, and O). The extra work includes a prescreening process that improves the quality of the biosolids from each digester and allows for a land application disposal method in lieu of the planned landfill method at a considerable cost savings to the District. The original contract included work involved with cleaning the digesters, moving the contents to the drying beds and time to allow the biosolids to dry. It did not include costs for biosolids disposal. The District was responsible for hauling and disposal of the dried biosolids obtained during the cleaning process to an approved landfill. This change order item would include all costs for biosolids disposal. The extra work includes prescreening biosolids, disposal of prescreened materials, performing biosolids tests in a state certified laboratory prior to hauling (moisture content, metals, coliforms, and toxicology tests), transporting biosolids (after drying)for land application, and taking the necessary steps to prevent excessive odors during loading and transporting. The contractor shall follow all Local, State, and Federal rules and regulations to perform the cleaning and hauling process regarding the usage of biosolids obtained during the cleaning process for land application. During the construction phase, the Contractor proposed prescreening the biosolids to a quality acceptable for land application in lieu of hauling to a landfill. The details of the proposal are as follows: • Delete bid hems 4 and 5 in the amounts of$168,000.00 and$8,000.00 from the contract amount. • Include$104,000.00 per digester(total of$728,000.00 for seven digesters)for cleaning and land application of biosolids. The engineer's estimate is 2000 tons of biosolids per digester. For quantities over 2000 tons of biosolids the cost of disposal would be an additional $52.00 per ton and would be included in a future Change Order. The cost of$104,000.00 also includes disposal of all plastics and grit obtained during the prescreening process. • The Contractor would perform tests on the dried biosolids prior to hauling to ensure that they are suitable for land application. Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I. J, K, L, M, N. and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 COST SAVINGS SUMMARY Project Budget Contractor's Proposal Land Fill Land Applied) Cost Per Ton $59.94 $52.00 Total Cost for 14,000 tons $839,180.00 ' $728,000.00 Net Savings $111,180.00 'These funds were not included in the construction contract. Funds were included in the total project budget to be performed by the District under separate contract. Total cost for disposal of biosolids per the Contractor's proposal $728,000 Deletion of bid items 4 & 5 $176,000 Net Change Order amount $552,000 This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10.6(121)(2)(a)of the General Provisions. Reference District's Letter Dated November 18, 1999, November 23, 1999, and November 29, 1999 and Margate's Letter Dated October 11, 1999, November 9, 1999 and Fax Dated November 8, 1999. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $552,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $552,000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. } Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: Aori126. 2000 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I J. K L M N. and O at Plant No 2.Job Number P2-39 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 72 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 802 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 4, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price 3 9,647,600.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (142,344.00) This Change (Add) (Deduet) 3 552,000.00 Amended Contract Price S 10.057.256.00 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 26, 2000 Job: Rehablitation of Digesters I. J. K. L. M. N. and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Board Authorization Date: April 26, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date H\wp a� ,U0e5&CO NTRACTSP2-n\Change Orders\CO2da PDCCOMMITTEE MeetlRgDa[e To BE.of Din 4/6100 4126100 AGENDA REPORT RnmNumb Rem Numbs PD000-26 13(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Angie Anderson, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: ON-CALL SERVICES FOR THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPUTER MODELS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. for on-call computer services necessary to update and maintain computer models developed under the 1999 Strategic Plan, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000. SUMMARY Computer modeling was performed for the District's Strategic Plan to determine deficiencies in the collection system and to analyze treatment scenarios. Staff recommends that the Strategic Plan consultant, Camp Dresser and McKee (CDM), be retained to perform ongoing computer modeling services through an on-call (blanket) Professional Services Agreement (PSA). The proposed on-call services will allow Engineering to "fine tune" the implementation of the 20 year Capital Improvement Program, and to incorporate updated information that was not available in the initial Strategic Plan analysis. The on-call services will also be used for updating the model as new collection system projects are designed and built, and to reflect changes in land use designations adopted by cities. In addition, the District frequently is required to respond to development proposals in our service area to determine impacts on the collection system from increased flows. Specialized computer hardware, software, training, and commitment of staff will be necessary for the District to perform these services in-house. The Engineering Department has determined that an interim contract with CDM for 18 months is the best approach for maintaining and using the model, until the computerized records and drawing system, and collection system GIS are substantially complete. The proposed PSA allows the District to utilize and update the Strategic Plan computer models while the District's internal capabilities are being developed. CDM is being proposed as a sole source due to their expertise and experience with the District's 1999 Strategic Plan computer models. The models are complex and require specialized training, hardware and software. Engineering is also not aware of another firm capable of executing the work in a manner consistent with the detailed assumptions used to develop the Strategic Plan models. \YWnWad1M9 GUWYSMv1BwN be"4"RryvN R MMe^4°RRob' 1W" . arm Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The on-call services will be performed on a time-and-material basis using an hourly billing rate. CDM will provide an estimate of the level of effort for staff review in advance of all work. CDM will not begin work until an authorized notice-to-proceed is received from the District. The on-call service agreement would have a cumulative total not to exceed $125,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: Strategic Plan, J-40-3) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The attached Budget Information Table is for the Strategic Plan Phase 2, Job No. J-40-3. Consultant fees of$40,000 for updating the model will be charged against Job No. J-40-3. Model runs for specific collection system projects will be charged against those individual project budgets. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Models developed for the Strategic Plan analysis include the EXTRAN model for the collection system, the STORM model for wet-weather flow projections, and a facilities model to project future process needs at the treatment plants. Under the proposed blanket Professional Services Agreement (PSA), Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM) will perform modeling of the collection system and treatment and disposal facilities on an as-needed basis. District staff will develop a Scope of Work and for each model run that is to be completed by the Consultant. The Consultant will submit a brief proposal addressing the model configuration, schedule, and estimated fee to complete the work for each task. Upon agreement on the Scope of Work, model configuration and estimated cost, the Consultant will be issued a task order to proceed with the work. Tasks to be performed under the proposed blanket PSA include: • Performing model runs to identify and evaluate impacts of increased flows from new developments in the District's service area • Performing model runs to evaluate alternatives for sewer system improvements and expansion projects • Evaluating impacts of operational changes such as diversion of flow between trunk sewer systems • Revising land use and drainage area information from City General Plans • Incorporating future collection system projects into the model NedmNeplMy.dh\ep•Ne�W/panda Repe,h�YJCd BUN•peMa RepbblpTXsn 1J�I�.dol R. � Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Do not approve PSA Should the PSA not be approved, the computer models developed under the Strategic Plan will become outdated. The District would not have the ability to use the models to fine tune the 20 year, $220 million collection system Capital Improvement Program as changes occur in the service area that were not considered in the initial Strategic Plan effort. CEQA FINDINGS None required ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report AA:jak AY donWMal\wp.dta%agendaV3oard Agenda Repoha\2000 Board Agenda Repo&0400Vlem 13(0.dot \Ymbn`Yah1Y.9 E2WvNaVISN IpeMa fleM'a�31'a AYeM NWwhW W.4n 1]IntrR a� Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STRATEGIC PLAN JOB NO. J-40-3 I ss .,I PR3OJECTrFASKM p 11 b0s*PKQ IN R"I.— SE A" , f 4, A,Project Development 0% Desion Staff $ 700.000 $ 614.598 . $ 614.598 $ 614,598 $ 614,598 . $ 411,612 67% Consultant PSA $ 233,000 $ 1.457.044 $ 1.457.0441 $ 1,457,044 $ 1,457,041 $ 1.432,000 98% Construction Contract $ 90,000 $ 90.000 40,000 $ 40,000 0% Construction(Other) $ 11,818 $ 11,818 i 0% Construction Staff 0% [Contingency 1 1 $ 20,2401 $ 20,240 0% ITOTAL' 1 $ 933.000 1$ 2,193,700 1 $ $ 2.193,700 $ 2,071,642 $ 40.000 $ 2,111642 $ 1,843,6121 87% Of the$125,000 blanket PSA.$40,000 will be charged to Job No.J-40-3.The remainder will be charged to various collection system projects as model runs are required. h*p.dui ,Vo. *vt WW. F.Re 1V1798 Professional Services Agreement Status Report On-call Computer Services for 1999 Strategic Plan Models Total Project Budget: $ 125,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 1, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costa Proposed Original PSA Blanket Purchase Order for On-call Computer Not to Exceed Services for 1999 Strategic Plan Models $125,000 H1wp.dtMengV0BS&CONTRACTSGSTRAT PIANV-00-3tY000\Oncall Computer Services PSA Status Report.doc PDC COMMITTEE M"Ung Date To BE.or qr. 4106/00 4/26/OD AGENDA REPORT Irem r.MW mem WMI)a PDCOO-27 IN) y Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-67 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Water 3 Engineering for design and study of Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-67, for a total amount not to exceed $283,280. SUMMARY The objective of the Peak Flow Management Project, Job No. J-67, is to update the District's peak flow emergency operational procedures to make them consistent with the recent Strategic Plan. The Consultant shall provide an in-depth evaluation of proposed improvements and integrate on-going projects into the planning process for peak flow management. The options presented in the Strategic Plan will be thoroughly evaluated, resulting in recommendations to proceed with the most beneficial and cost effective projects. The Preliminary Design Report (PDR) which includes these recommendations and cost/benefit analyses will be complete by September 2000. This report and information will be available to the Board as they make decisions on the GWRS Project in early 2001. Emphasis is being placed on maximum use of existing facilities whenever possible and cooperative projects with member agencies. Two specific design tasks as recommended in the Strategic Plan are also included in this project. The primary goals and objectives for this project have been defined as follows: • Reduce the risk of sanitary sewer overflows during wet weather events • Provide hydraulic relief to the existing Ocean Outfall with flow equalization • Maximize the use of existing tank volume for peak flow shaving • Obtain capital cost estimates to construct proposed storage facilities • Develop an accurate hydraulic model of the treatment facilities suitable for use by District staff • Upgrades to the Santa Ana Emergency Overflow Structures including: Raising of weirs at termination structure SAR discharge points, and Modification of 84-inch interplant pipeline at junction box at Plant No. 1. • Modifications to Primary Clarifiers A, B & C at Plant No. 2 for use as flow equalization structures. Three consultants submitted proposals on January 31, 2000: Water 3 Engineering; Camp Dresser& McKee; and ASL Consulting Engineers. Staff recommends the approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to Water 3 Engineering for a total amount not to exceed $283,280. n,e„n.. v Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The amounts requested for authorization are as follows and as shown in the attached Budget Information Table: An initial authorization for$283,280 is being requested to cover the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Water 3 Consultants. This proposed total authorization for the PSA is a conglomerate of$227,200 of previously budgeted Consultant PSA funds and an additional $56,080 from "Contingency". See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: 1999/2000 Budget Section 8, Page 215 and Page 93, Contract No. J-67, $3,640,000) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The funds for this project are from Treatment Plant No. 2 Capital Improvement Budget under Project Number J-67. $20,000 is being requested for "Project Development". This $20,000 will moved from "Contingency" and be added to the previously authorized$17,000 request for a total proposed total authorization amount of$37,000. This $37,000 shall adequately cover additional and existing expenditures to "Project Development". An initial request for$144,500 is being requested for"Design Staff" as this project has progressed to this phase of design. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this contract. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background As the combination of dry weather flows and severe storm-related inflow/infiltration increases each year, the collection system, the treatment plants and the outfalls are now reaching their maximum hydraulic capacity. Among other alternatives, the 1999 Strategic Plan discusses the construction of a second ouffall structure as a means of handling projected peak flows. As installation costs for a second ocean outall would be extremely high, District staff(with direction from the Board of Directors) have opted to continue on-going studies and investigations to evaluate lower-cost alternatives. The Strategic Plan offers several suggestions to reduce or alleviate discharge of peak flow. However, most of these recommendations must be more thoroughly investigated. This project, Job No. J-67, will encompass investigation and/or improvements that could be implemented at Plant No. 1, R« a'"°° Page 2 Plant No. 2, and the piping that connects the two facilities. Investigation and recommended improvements to collection system components will be handled under other projects. Close coordination of all relevant projects will ensure that the District will v identify and implement the most feasible alternatives to effectively manage peak Flows for the entire system. Proposal Evaluation Four engineering consulting firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required scope of services. Cathcart Garcia Von Langan opted not to submit a proposal. The remaining three firms submitted proposals on January 31, 2000: ASL Consulting Engineers; Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.; and Water 3 Engineering. Interviews for each of these firms were held on February 23, 2000. The proposals were evaluated and ranked by Staff. Water 3 Engineering (W3) had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach, thorough understanding of the Scope of Work, and similar project experience. See the attached "Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services" for more information. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS Peak Flow Management was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Summary of Staff Evaluation of Proposals & Staff Recommendation RW:jak H:Nvp.dla%agendMBoard Agenda RepoRe2000 Boanl Agenda Repa ts'0400Utem 13(g).dw n� erpea Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO.J-67 ORIOINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED- PROPOSEO THIS AUTHORI2ATIOH PROPOSED TOTAL PROJECTRASK AUTHORED PROTECT BUDGET REVISED BUDGET AUTHORREDTO REQUEST- AUTHORIMIRON EXPENDRUPETO EXPEIIOED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE DATE DATE DATEI%) . P Io De nl S 17000 $ 1I000 $ 20000 $ 37000 S 17,000 $ 20UDD $ 37000 $ 27,600 162% Des n StO S 14 500 $ 1M 500 S 1M 600 $ 1"'im Consultant PGA s 227200 S 227200 S 58080 $ 283280 1 $ 28 280 $ 283280 Condrudlon Conned $ 1761000 $ 1761000 S - S - $ CdaDUdim(OW S - $ CondnxBon Ste6 It 650300 $ 650300 s - S - $ Corti en S W000 S mo,ow S 7608p S TS3,9W $ TOTAL $ 3,890.000 S 3.600000 S - $ 1,084,200 S 17,000 $ U7,780 $ 4es,780 $ 27.600 162% H:\wp.dtaMngUOSS B CONTRACTSU-674,1-67 Budget Table.xls]DIslDcls C Professional Services Agreement Status Report Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Job No. J-67 Total Project Budget: $283,280 Consultant: Water 3 Engineering Start Date of Project: April 27, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original PSA Studies and Design of Peak Flow Management at $283,280 $283,280 Plants No. 1 and No. 2 Facilities H:W,p.dl ngUOBS&CONTRACTSU-87U467 PSA SUWs Remrtdoc 03/15/00 Revised 05/14/98 J PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO. J-67 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting fines received Requests for Proposals: • ASL Consulting Engineers • Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. (CDM) • Cathcart Garcia Von Langen (CGVL) • Water 3 Engineering, Inc. (W3) Cathcart Garcia Von Langen declined to submit a proposal. Water 3 Engineering, Inc. partnered with Carollo Engineers for this project As a result, there were three responsive proposals received on February 1, 2000. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel from February 1 to February 23, 2000. Formal interviews with all three responsive firms and an OCSD review panel on February 23, 2000. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience — Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule - Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. The three proposals were evaluated and all three teams were interviewed on February 23, 2000. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results for the three firms: 1. Water 3 Engineering, Inc. (W3) 1472 Points 2. ASL Consulting Engineers 1327 Points 3. Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. (CDM) 1153 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Water 3 Engineering (Water 3)/Carollo Engineers (Carollo) Water 3 Engineering has the most comprehensive understanding of the requirements for this project. As they are new to the District process, they choose to partner with Carollo, whom has extensive background and knowledge of the OCSD plants and system. They present the most thorough approach— touching on all of the key questions and raising some that were not covered in the RFP (i.e. risk analysis/feasibility comparison). Their team is comprised of a solid staff with direct experience on six similar Peak Flow Management projects in the last three years. Of the firms who proposed, they were the only one to have this first hand experience. The Project Manager is one of the principals of the company. The Lead Project Engineer has direct experience with the hydraulic modeling done for the District's Peak Hydraulic Discharge and the Investigation and Repair of Ocean Ouffall projects. The team chosen by Carollo is well established with numerous projects performed for the District and a firm knowledge of OCSD facilities. The software proposed for this project provided the easiest interface and flexibility toward achieving the goals set for in this project, expansion and benefit to District staff for future design projects. ASL Consulting (ASL) ASL presented a good solid engineering approach to this project. However, as they have no direct experience with comparable projects, their approach was not overly creative. They proposed the use of a spreadsheet program for the modeling of the hydraulic grades for both plants and the connector piping. Though accurate, OCSD Staff didn't feel that the proposed software offered the necessary user interface that we had hoped for. This would preclude the hydraulic model from being upgraded easily by OCSD staff as plant improvements are completed over the next few years. Y Camp. Dresser& McKee (CDM) The approach that CDM presented was the most limited of the three proposals. It appeared that CDM relied heavily on its recommendations proposed in the Strategic Plan and did not plan any other further investigation of more efficient means of peak flow "shaving"for this project. As OCSD staff is not convinced that construction of a large equalization basin is "a given", CDM's proposal that this facility should be built, led District staff to believe that CDM's overall view of the project's needs was rather limited. CDM proposed use of a new software package named Plant-It STOAT for the modeling portion of this project. This is currently the only commercially available software that is capable of performing this function. However, OCSD staff is not convinced that this is the best software for this modeling application and was more impressed with the potential capabilities and user ease of other proposed software. Summary Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the Water 3 Engineering/Carollo Engineers team as their first choice of the three responsive consultants. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the four candidates. The top-ranked consultant team of Water 3 Engineering and Carollo Engineers submitted the highest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Though their fees were the highest of the three proposals, OCSD staff felt that their thoroughness of the scope warranted the additional proposed expense. W3E/Carollo also attached an optional risk assessment analysis for a cost of $29,250 that the other proposals did not address. Upon review of this option, staff recommends that the PSA be written without inclusion of this additional item at this time. Staff recommends Water 3 Engineering/Carollo Engineers be awarded the PSA for Peak Flow Management at Plant Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-67 for a total fee not to exceed $283,280. RW.,jak HAwp.dtMengUOBS&CONTRACTSU67U.67 Staff Ev Iualion.dw ' PDCCOMMMEE "�"npDie TOB°'af° ' +sao 4:_A AGENDA REPORT 1eiiNuin1w 10eiiNiin°' voao-m rsrm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry A. Rein, Project Manager SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. I-2A GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4, for an amount not to exceed $845,300. SUMMARY The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Bushard Trunk Sewer as hydraulically deficient and proposed that improvements to the Bushard Trunk Sewer include provisions for wet weather flow storage and diversion of flows from the Knott Interceptor Sewer. The Bushard Trunk sewer was recently inspected and found to be structurally deficient. The polyurethane coating has peeled away from the inside sewer walls. Up to 66% of the concrete sewer wall has corroded away, and the steel reinforcing has corroded. This project will provide engineering services needed to alleviate the deficiencies and provide for wet weather flow storage and diverted flows. The Professional Service Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report(PDR), utility research, geotechnical investigation, aerial and field surveying, permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support services. Four firms submitted proposals on January 25, 2000: AKM Consulting Engineers, Boyle Engineering Corporation; Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc.; and Carollo Engineers. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for an amount not to exceed $845,300. Consultants were ranked following the evaluation of their proposals and an interview. Boyle Engineering Corporation achieved the highest staff ranking based upon Boyle's understanding of the Scope of Work. The design work will take eleven to twelve months to complete and will begin within one month of approval of the PSA. The completion of construction work is estimated to be March of 2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Previously, a PSA was awarded to DGA Consultants, Inc. in the amount of$47,479, to inspect and evaluate condition of the Bushard Trunk Sewer. The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. n.a.a. m Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT - ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, 1-24) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests that a budget increase for Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) be taken from the contingency, with no change to the overall budget. The funds for this project are taken from the Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities Project portion of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the sewer as hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. The purpose of this project is to provide consulting services to implement the replacement of approximately 21,000 feet of trunk sewer. Proiect Scooe This PSA will provide a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) and preparation of construction documents for the contract. Elements of the PSA include: • Engineering design services • Preparation of a PDR • Geotechnicai investigation • Utility research • Aerial and field surveying • Potholing of existing facilities • Permit acquisition • Design work, including preparation of final construction documents • Construction support services The project will present unique engineering challenges, including the following: • The adequacy of the right-of-way in the Cape May Lane Area • The impact on vehicle traffic and neighborhood access • Construction nuisance impacts such as noise • Meeting the concerns of the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley and the neighborhood associations such as Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association • Prevention of odor generation in the completed project R .t � Page The Consultants Scope of Work includes provisions to ensure these challenges are addressed. The Scope of Work requirements include the following: • Address the environmental impacts and the mitigation means noted in the Program Environmental Impact Statement. Incorporate the mitigation means into the construction contract documents. Impacts noted include construction noise, dirt, and neighborhood disruption. • Address the vehicular traffic impacts in Preliminary Design Report (PDR) and prepare traffic control plans. • Look at alternatives to using Cape May Lane right-of-way including Banning Drive and other local streets. • Develop and review plans with local agencies and meet with the agencies as necessary. • Address odors in the PDR and incorporate odor mitigation measures in the project design. Evaluation and Selection Process Five engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. Four proposals were received on January 25, 2000: AKM Consulting Engineers; Boyle Engineering Corporation; Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.; and Carollo Engineers. One of the invited firms, DGA Consultants, decided to be on the Carollo team as a sub-consultant. The proposals were evaluated and all four teams were interviewed on February 9, 2000. Boyle Engineering Corporation had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach and understanding of the Scope of Work. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27,1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. Under this PSA, the selected Consultant will verify the adequacy of these documents and will alert the District if additional CEQA documentation is required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services LAR:jak H1wp.d1a\9genda1Board Agenda RepodaUM Board Agenda Reports\04000tem 13(h).dw ReAeM: aaaae Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2.4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS:_ THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ,ESTIS%TEB- PROJECTII'ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT .BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION .TOTAL EXP9NDRURE itookkOEO' BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO bAYtH+Yq.- Project Development $ 7,800 $ $ $ Design Staff $ 726.062 $ 606,700 1 $ 606,700 $ 606,700 $ - $ 606.700 $ 43,533 7% Consultant PSA $ 260,900 $ 260,900 $ 631,900 $ 892,800 $ 47,479 $ 845300 $ 892.779 $ 43,314 5% Construction Contract $ 21,010,873 $ 21,010.900 $ - $ 21,010,900 $ - $ - $ Construction Other) $ - $ $ $ Construction Staff $ 3,248,942 $ 3,284,600 $ - $ 3.284,600 $ - $ Contingency $ 7.548,9241 $ 7,548,900 1 $ 631.900 $ 6,917,000 $ - $ TOTAL $ 32,803,501 1 $ 32,712.000 1$ - $ 32,712,000 $ 654,179 $ 846,300 $ 1,499,479 $ 86,847 H1"pftbn,VOBS a CONTR CTSL24gl-24 Budgm T.WAsJDletd 5:twp.�Wofonnsftdget table Form Re w1211TIga Professional Services Agreement Status Report Bushard Trunk Sewer Contract No 1-2.4 Total Project Budget: $32,712,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Date of Project: Project Development began in late 1998, Design expected to start May 2000. Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to $845,300 $845,300 PSA provide engineering services for the Bushard Trunk Sewer rehabilitation. Services include preparation of a preliminary design report, geotechnical investigation, utility research, surveying, design work, and construction support services. HAwp.dblengWO85&CONTRACTS4.2411.24 PSA SWIus RepoN.doc 03120/00 ReAs DW14/98 BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested firms received Request for Proposal: • AKM Consulting Engineers • Boyle Engineering Corporation • Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. • Carollo Engineers • DGA Consultants, Inc. DGA Consultants declined to submit a proposal and instead teamed with Carollo Engineers as a sub-consultant. As a result, four consulting firms submitted proposals on January 25, 2000. Proposals were then reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel from January 25, 2000 until February 16, 2000. The review panel consisted of six members. The review panel also interviewed each consultant on February 9, 2000. The Consultants were evaluated based upon the interviews and proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work. Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work. Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Proiect Experience. Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to design of sewers. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design of sewers. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to design of sewers. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team. 6. Proposed Schedule. Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule? Each consultant's "List of Assumptions and Exceptions to the Scope of Work" were evaluated as to whether the assumptions and exceptions were acceptable. The four consulting firms were then ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the four fines: 1. Boyle Engineering Corporation 1774 points 2. AKM Consulting Engineers 1669 points 3. Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. 1630 points 4. Carollo Engineers 1630 points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) Boyle Engineering had the highest ranked proposal based on project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. Boyle's understanding of right-of-way issues, head-works concerns, and traffic considerations was better than other consultants' understanding. Several good ideas were expressed in Boyle's proposal and at the interview. The staffs' qualifications presented by Boyle were good and the Boyle staff had similar project experience. The proposed project teams, including the sub-consultants, were well organized based upon specialties and division of work. AKM Consulting Engineers (AKM) AKM had a good understanding of the Scope of Work and their project approach was good except that AKM proposed a greater level of effort in reviewing sewer flows than the District staff believed was necessary. AKM's plan for managing and performing the work was rated slightly higher than Boyle's was. AKM was rated lower than Boyle in applicable related project experience, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization and use of sub-consultants. AKM and Boyle tied in proposed schedule ratings. Camp Dresser& McKee. Inc. (CDM) Although the District Staff felt CDM had a fair understanding of the Scope of Work, CDM's proposal and interview preparation did not demonstrate as thorough of an understanding as Boyle and AKM. CDM proposed a level of effort that was almost double that of Boyle without adequately explaining the need for such a level of effort. Carollo Engineers (Carollo) Carollo based their project approach upon what they called an "enhanced approach'. Carollo's"enhanced approach" differed from the Scope of Work requested in the RFP in that Carollo was proposing to route flows using the Ellis Pump Station and other existing sewers rather than increasing the capacity of the Bushard Trunk Sewer system. The District Staff found Carollo's approach interesting and worth considering, but after considering the approach, the District Staff felt the approach was probably not workable. The District Staff ranked Carollo's project approach and understanding of the work lower than the other three consultants' rank since Carollo's proposal was based upon their"enhanced approach"only. In the other categories, except for the proposed schedule, Carollo did not rank as high as the other firms. Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the four candidates. The top ranked consultant, Boyle Engineering Corporation, submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Boyle Engineering Corporation's fee proposal is 34% lower than the fee proposal submitted by AKM Consulting Engineers, the second ranked consultant. Staff recommends Boyle Engineering Corporation be awarded the PSA for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation,for a total fee not to exceed $845,300. LRJak H.1wp.dWengUOBS&COHrR CTSV-24g-24 staff e"Iuaton. o TABLE 1.0 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Boyle AKM CDM Carollo Reviewer A 236 247 263 233 Reviewer B 299 258 262 282 Reviewer C 296 279 299 315 Reviewer D 258 268 269 248 Reviewer 350 311 270 274 Reviewer F 335 306 267 278 Total Score 1774 1669 1630 1630 2100 Points Maximum Average Score 295.7 278.2 271.7 271.7 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 7,339 12,545 13,060 9,367 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 51.0 49.2 47.4 49.0 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $845,300 $1,296,094 $1,745,014 $995,760 PDC COMMITTEE Meeft Date to ad.aDir. o�asao oasaoo AGENDA REPORT RomNinbef Item NinW PD00(1•29 130) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Michael Sarullo, Project Manager SUBJECT: PLANT UTILITIES REHABILITATION AND REFURBISHMENT JOB NO. P2.82 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers for professional engineering services for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $308,212; and (2) Approve a budget amendment of$2,594,000 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2- 82, for a total project budget of$3,394,000. SUMMARY Several of the existing Plant Nos. 1 and 2 utility systems are in need of rehabilitation and replacement as identified by a 1997 Corrosion Assessment Study. Additionally, the District's Operation and Maintenance (0&M) Division has requested that modifications be made to various facilities to minimize safety concems and potential disruptions to plant operations. The original project budget was established without having a detailed Scope of Work. After conducting a field survey and meeting with Operations and Maintenance staff, a more complete Scope was identified, which required that the project budget be increased. The rehabilitation work under this project is part of the$665 million included in Strategic Plan 20 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Professional Services Agreement(PSA) includes the preparation of a Project Report, design services and construction support Staff received proposals from three firms: CGVL Engineers, Lee &Ro, Inc., and MSEBeck. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with CGVL Engineers for an amount not to exceed $308,212. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section 6, Page 92) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The original budget was based on a rough estimate that was established without having a detailed Scope of Work developed. The project budget has been revised to reflect the detailed Scope of Work resulting from the facility survey. This revision increases the project budget from $1,000,000 to $3,394,000 as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Backaround In 1997, a Corrosion Assessment Study was performed to review the condition of facilities at Plant Nos.1 and 2 and to present a long tens view of the District's overall corrosion control management program. The conclusion of the study was that several of the existing utility systems have been in service beyond their expected useful lives and are in need of rehabilitation, refurbishment or replacement. Additionally, the study made recommendations to extend the useful life of the facilities and to reduce operation and maintenance costs. Since this study was performed three years ago, a field survey was done by the District's Engineering Department to determine the current condition of the existing facilities. Further, the District's Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Staff has requested that modifications be made to various utility systems to minimize safety concerns and potential disruptions to plant operations that were not identified in the 1997 Study. It is critical that the utilities identified by 0&M are operable and reliable to support treatment plant operations. This project addresses the critical utility work items based on field investigation work, information contained in the Corrosion Assessment Study, and several meefings with O&M personnel. Scope of Professional Services Agreement (PSA) The PSA will include preparation of a Project Report, design services, O&M Manuals, and construction support for the following items: 1. Replacement of corroded portions of existing Steam Line at Plant No. 1 2. Modifications to the Plant Water and Reclaimed Water System at Plant No. 1 3. Rehabilitation and replacement of equipment and utilities in the Plant Water Pump Station at Plant 2 4. Replacement of pumps and piping at the Old Chlorine Pump Station at Plant No. 2 5. Installation of a motor operated isolation gate in the Activated Sludge Effluent Channel at Plant No. 2 6. Investigation and replacement of corroded Plant Water Lines in tunnels at Plant No. 2 7. Recoating of Digester Gas Holder exterior and modification to the flame arrestor at Plant No. 2 8. Preparation of a Design Memorandum for installation of chemically resistant aprons and sump drains for chemical stations at Plant No. 2 9. Completion of Reclaimed Water loop and connections to various facilities at Plant No. 2 Consultant Evaluation and Selection Process The proposals were evaluated in accordance with District policy. Of the three firms submitting proposals, Lee& Ro had the highest ranking based on their applicable staff qualifications, understanding of the Scope of Work and previous experience. CGVL Engineers had the second highest ranked proposal and their fee was approximately 35% less than Lee & Ro. CGVL's proposal confirmed an understanding of the job and included a solid project approach and a realistic budget. CGVL has experience on similar jobs and has worked successfully on other projects with the District. MSEBeck was ranked second by one member of the selection committee however, the overall average of the scores ranked MSEBeck third. The majority of the committee members believed that MSE/Beck's proposal did not contain adequate detail and did not propose an adequate number of hours to perform a complete design. Although they had the second ranked proposal, staff recommends that CGVL Engineers be selected for this project based on their combined proposal evaluation and fee. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals MJS:jak H:1wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repods12000 Board Agenda ReWsQ4 Tem 13(i.doc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT UTILTIES REHABILITATION JOB NO. P2-82 ,ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTSUITED ESTIINA PROPOSEDTOTAL PROJECTRABK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BU INCREASE REVISED 'AVTIIOIOZEO ',AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION EXTO DATE, OOAT ED. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET ' TO DATE t. REQUEST '• TO DATE, DA7E(SZj PmIect Deve eM $ 13ODO S 13000 $ 380D0 $ 51.000 $ 13000 $ 38.000 E 57000 E 51000 100% Design Staff S 39000 $ 39000 S 48000 $ 87000 $ 390D0 E 48.000 S 87000 0% CanwBaM PSA $ - $ - $ 310000 $ 310.000 $ $308212 S 308212 0% cwswctw CAn9Ht1 S 202000 $ 20200D $ i.79B.DOO $ 2000000 $ S 0% Com coon OWar $ 746000 $ 746000 E 5550D0 $ 191000 $ $ 0% Construction Slab $ - $ - $ 155,000 S 155,000 $ $ 0% ConOn S - $ - $ 800000 $ 600000 $ $ 0% TOTAL E 1,000,000 1$ 1,000,000 $ 2,394,000 $ 3,394.000 $ 52.000 $ 394,212 $ 446,212 $ 51,000 11% Professional Services Agreement Status Report Plant Utility Rehabilitation and Refurbishment Job No. P2-82 Total Project Budget: $3,394,000 Consultant: CGVL Engineers Start Date of Project: 5/1/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original PSA Design of Rehabilitation of Plant Utilities $308,212 $308,212 \lradonldatal%w .dtalengUOBS&CONT CTSW2-82 Planl Utilities Re8a811tiatienWSW2-82 PSA States Reporl.dw 03/27/00 Revised 05114/98 Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment. Job No. 132-82 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Black and Veatch • CGVL Engineers • Lee & Ro, Inc. • MSE/RW Beck Black and Veatch declined to submit a proposal. As a result, three fines submitted proposals on March 15, 2000. Proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of five members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10, 10 being best, in seven categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work — Rates the company's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rates the company's ability to perform project management services and to interface with the District. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience—A comparison of the company's experience and expertise in the assessment of plant utility work and the design and preparation of related construction documents. 4. Applicable Recent Projects — Recent projects performed at the District or other facilities that relate to the items in the Scope of Work. 5. Applicable Staff Qualifications —A comparison of the company's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to study and design of plant utility work. 6. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments of consultant staff and/or subconsultants to the work. 7. Proposed Schedule — Understanding of tasks to be performed and completed to meet the schedule per the Scope of Work. The in-house selection committee evaluated and discussed the three proposals on March 17, 2000. The three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached results of the three firms (See Table 1.0): 1. Lee& Ro, Inc. 304 points 2. CGVL Engineers 292 points 3. MSE / Beck 287 points After evaluating the proposals, the selection committee opened the sealed cost proposals submitted. The top ranked consultant, Lee& Ro, Inc. submitted a fee proposal of$469,432 for the requested Scope of Work. CGVL Engineers submitted a fee proposal of$308,212 and MSE/Beck submitted a fee proposal of$174,135. The following is a firm-by-fine description of how the selection committee collectively viewed the firms: Lee & Ro. Inc. Lee & Ro, Inc. displayed strength in their applicable recent projects and applicable staff qualifications. Compared to the other two Consultants, the hours proposed by Lee& Ro, Inc. were much higher for many of the tasks included in the Scope of Work. A meeting was held between Staff and Lee & Ro, Inc. to clarify the design effort required as well as the District's expectations. CGVL Engineers CGVL displayed a good understanding of the project elements and applicable related project experience. They provided a well-balanced approach, which included the necessary resources for preliminary engineering efforts and final design. CGVL proposed utilizing various specialized subconsultants, which will provide the necessary expertise to generate a thorough, complete design. CGVL has also proposed a well-qualified and experienced project management team, which are familiar with the utility systems and other facilities at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. MSE/Beck MSE/Beck demonstrated an average understanding of the Scope of Work. The proposal was brief and did not address the project elements in detail. Their estimate of the man- hours and number of drawings required for the project appeared to be too low to adequately complete the design. Based on the proposal evaluations and proposed fee, Staff recommends selecting CGVL Engineers for award of the contract. Even though MSE/Beck submitted the lowest fee, their proposal did not contain confine a complete understanding of the job. The selection committee agreed that CGVL Engineers submitted a more complete proposal, higher level of detail and more project related experience. Staff recommends CGVL Engineers to be awarded the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for the Plant Utility Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for a total fee not to exceed $308,212. TABLE 1.0 Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Lee & Ro, Inc. CGVL Engineers MSE/ Beck Reviewer A 289 338 318 Reviewer B 294 295 255 Reviewer C 299 297 253 Reviewer D 310 283 284 Reviewer E 330 248 326 Total Score 1522 1461 1436 1750 Points Maximum Average Score 304.4 292.2 287.2 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 5192 3538 1672 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 40 40 40 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $469,432 $308,212 $174,135 HAwp.dtatengVOBS&CONTR CTST2-82 Plant Utilities RehabllibllonN2-82 Staff Evaluation.doc PDC COMMITTEE Meen�y Date TU 4 Bd.of Nr. 9/O6/00 /36/00 AGENDA REPORT Item O-30 Iem Number PmCNumb 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-31, AND ATWOOD SUBTRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 2-50 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide engineering services for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements, Contract No. 2-50, for a total amount not to exceed $504,685. SUMMARY The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Santa Ana River Interceptor and Atwood Subtrunk Sewers in the cities of Anaheim and Placentia, to be hydraulically deficient. The Consultant will analyze and evaluate approximately 12,900 feet of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and approximately 3500 feet of the Atwood Subtrunk Sewers and recommend improvements. The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR), utility research, geotechnical investigation, aerial and field surveying, permit acquisition, preparation of final construction documents, and construction support services for each individual contract. Five firms submitted proposals on February 17, 2000: Montgomery Watson; Boyle Engineering Corporation; Camp Dresser & McKee; Brown & Caldwell; and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates. Staff reviewed and ranked the proposals between February 17, 2000 and March 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for a total amount not to exceed $504,685. The design work will take ten to eleven months to complete and will begin within one month of approval of the PSA. The completion of construction work is estimated to be August of 20D4. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. See the attached Budget Information Tables for more information. a,.,., ,7u,a Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: 1999/00 Budget Section 8, Page 208, Contract No. 2-31, $11.853,600 and Section 8, Page 208 Contract No.2-50, $1,890,100) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The funds for this project are from Revenue Area No. 2 Capital Improvement Budget under two separate Contract Nos. 2-31, and 2-50. The budget for Contract No. 2-31 is $11,853,600 and for Contract No. 2-50 is $1,890,100. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Tables for these two contracts. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's 1999 Strategic Plan identified the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements to be hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement or capacity enhancement. The purpose of this project is to provide consulting services to design improvements to approximately 16,400 feet of trunk sewers. Proposal Evaluation Five engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. All five firms submitted proposals on February 17, 2000: Montgomery Watson; Boyle Engineering Corporation; Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc.; Brown & Caldwell; and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates. The proposals were evaluated and ranked by Staff. Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) had the highest ranked proposal based on their project approach, solid understanding of the Scope of Work and similar project experience. Boyle researched the project and demonstrated their understanding expressed in their analyses of the project issues and cos( considerations. Boyle identified potential construction impacts in the cities of Anaheim and Placentia. They recommended traffic control alternatives to mitigate potential difficulties during construction. Boyle emphasized the importance of traffic and safety and compared this project to their recent involvement with similar District project issues. Boyle's proposed fee was the second lowest, however, their proposal was rated significantly higher than the lowest cost proposal. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals for additional information. ALTERNATIVES The PSA may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. R. erewe Page 2 CEOA FINDINGS r These projects were included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 2-31) 2. Budget Information Table (Contract No. 2-50) 3. PSA Status Report 4. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services HKjak HAwp.&a%gendarBaerd Agenda RepoftQODO Boats Agenda Repoft\U 0 tem 13(P.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2-31 0 Ky TTT Project Development $ 25,000 $ 25,000 40,441 $ 65,441 $ 25,000 $ 40,441 $ 65,441 66,441 100% Design Staff $ 504,000 $ 504.000 $ 504,000 $ 504,000 $ 504.000 0% Consultant PSA $ 1,115,000 $ 1.118,000 $ 1.115,000 $ 348.533 $ 348,533 0% Construction Contract $ 6.029.900 $ 6,029.900 $ 6,029,900 $ - tit Construction(Other) $ $ Construction Staff $ 1,459,000 1 $ 1,459,000 $ 1.459,000 $ Contngency $ 2.720,700 1 $ 2,720.700 1 $ (40,441)1 $ 2.680,259 ti $ ,TOTAL $ 11.853.600 , $ 11.853,600 , $ $ 11.853,600 25,000 , $ 892,9741 $ 917.974 , 5441 4 17V CATEMP12-31 BudgMnl..xls1D13tM BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ATWOOD SUBTRUNK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 2-50 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED -ESTIMATED ESTIMATEtS PROJECTITASK :AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED_ 'AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPANDED", BUDGET BUDGET, INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TD DATE TO DATEliq Proect Development $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 404 4% Design Staff $ 108,900 $ 108,900 $ 108,900 $ 108,900 $ 108,900 0% [Consultant PSA $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 156.152 $ 156,152 0% struction Contract $ 904,400 $ 9D4,400 $ 904,400 $ struction Other $ $ struction Staff $ 230,200 $ 230,200 $ 230,200 $ Contingency $ 436,200 $ 436.200 1 $ 436,200 1 Is TOTAL $ 1,890,100 $ 1,890,100 1 $ - 1 $ 1,890,100 1 $ 10,400 1 $ 265,052 $ 275,452 Is 404 1 0% HA"Ata\enaUDeS a CONTR CTW-01-50combine011250 Most Table.>tlelDletricte Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer—Contract No. 2-31 Atwood Subtrunk Improvements— Contract No. 2.50 Total Project Budget: $13,743,700 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Dale of Project: 511/00 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Design Improvements to the Santa Ana River $504,685 $504,685 PSA Interceptor, Contract No. 2-31 and Atwood Subtrunk, Contract No. 2-50 H:MxP.dle gWBS&CONTRACTSQ-31-50c bh*dtl -31-50 PSA Status Rep d.dm 03/14100 ReAs MUM SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-31 AND ATWOOD SUBTRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 2-50 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested firms received a Request for Proposals sent out on January 13, 2000: • Montgomery Watson Boyle Engineering Corporation • Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. • Brown and Caldwell • Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates Proposals were received from all five consulting firms on February 17, 2000. Proposals were then distributed for review and ranking by an in-house review panel. The review panel consisted of four members. The review panel met on March 9, 2000 and discussed the results of the evaluation. The Consultants were evaluated based upon the proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work. Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work. Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Proiect Experience. Rates the team's overall total number of year's experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to design of sewers. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design of sewers. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to design of sewers. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team. 6. Proposed Schedule. Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule? Each Consultant's "List of Assumptions and Exceptions to the Scope of Work" were evaluated as to whether the assumptions and exceptions were acceptable. The five consulting firms were then ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the five firms (See Table 1.0): 1. Boyle Engineering Corporation 1237.5 Points 2. Montgomery Watson 1216.5 Points 3. Robert Bein, William Frost&Associates 1165.5 Points 4. Brown & Caldwell 1147 Points 5. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. 1127 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) Boyle Engineering had the highest ranking proposal based on project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. Boyle's understanding and analyses of the project issues and cost considerations presented was the best compared to all of the other consultants. Several good ideas highlighted in Boyle's proposal included traffic and safety impacts, parallel relief sewers, other recent similar District project issue comparisons and sheet index of plans. The staffs' qualifications presented by Boyle were good and the Boyle staff had the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project teams, including the sub-consultants, were well organized based upon specialties and division of work. Montgomery Watson (Montgomery) Montgomery had the second highest ranking proposal based on project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable staff qualifications, and team organization. Montgomery's understanding of the project concerns, and traffic considerations was very good compared to most other consultants. Several good ideas were expressed in Montgomery's proposal including project website, availability of master specifications, resources for checking of CDM's hydraulic model and a public outreach program. The staffs' qualifications presented were good, but local experience were lacking. The proposed project team included a lot of sub-consultants. Robert Bein. William Frost & Associates (RBF) RBF had a good understanding of the Scope of Work as expressed in the project approach. Detailed considerations were expressed as it relates to alignment alternatives, utility relocations, permitting and community coordination. Very little details were provided regarding traffic concerns and Impacts which is considered a major issue for these projects. The staffs experience, were good but similar large diameter pipeline design experience were lacking. RBF provided a well- organized project team with very few sub-consultants which is good for these projects. Brown & Caldwell (B & C) B & C had a good understanding of the scope of work as expressed in the approach. Good alignment options were detailed as well as good knowledge of traffic control, community impacts and utilities in the Anaheim area. B & C expressed the need to conduct a CCTV inspection as part of their preliminary work, although not part of the District's Scope of Work. Plans for managing and accomplishing the preparation of plans and specifications were not detailed. B & C outlined very detailed microtunneling as an option to consider, this may be very expensive and may not work. The staffs experience presented were good, however, local large diameter pipeline design experience was very limited. B & C project team consisted of lots of sub-consultants. Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM) CDM recognized the extensive utility congestion of the SARI line and provided several alignment alternatives most of which were not feasible. CDM understood some of the project concerns including pipe joint design, manhole spacing considerations, corrosion resistant linings, permit processing and public outreach program but did not provide good details of the major issues. The staffs qualification presented by CDM were good, however local large diameter pipeline design experience were limited. The proposed project team, although well organized, consisted of lots of sub-consultants. 1 Fee Proposals After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the five firms. The top ranked consultant, Boyle Engineering Corporation, submitted the second lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Boyle Engineering Corporation's fee proposal is 6% higher than the lowest fee proposal submitted by CDM, the fifth ranking consultant. Staff recommends Boyle Engineering Corporation be awarded the PSA for the combined Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer and Atwood Subtrunk Improvements, for a total fee not to exceed $504,685. HK:jak HAwpAta%engWM 8 CAMRACTS%2-31-50c bir*02-3150 staff a wfimdx TABLE 1.0 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer— Contract No. 2-31 And Atwood Subtrunk Improvements —Contract No. 2-50 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Boyle Montgomery RBF B&C CDM Reviewer A 308 314 247 293 266 Reviewer B 292.5 280 315.5 278.5 277 Reviewer C 325 314.5 300 295.5 304 Reviewer D 312 308 303 280 280 Total Score 1237.5 1216.5 1165.5 1147 1127 1400 Points Maximum Average Score 309.4 304.1 291.4 286.8 281.8 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 4,278 4,813 6,476 6,389 6,433 Man-hours 100% Design Completion Proposed 46.0 57.0 50.0 52.0 39.0 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $504,685 $833,686 $783,488 $716,135 $476,490 PDC COMMITTEE �y qRe TO BG.Mgr. a+iowoo 09/36/00 AGENDA REPORT lm^ m^� l�13fkm1n� PD000-31 Orange County Sanitation D6tnd FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dennis May, Project Manager SUBJECT: COMPUTERIZED FACILITY RECORD AND DRAWING SYSTEM JOB NO. J-25-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C. (CFI)for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, providing additional consulting services in the amount of $459,703 for a total amount not to exceed $2,788,384. SUMMARY In July 1999, the District issued a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Computerized Facility Integration, L.L.C. (CFI)to provide consulting, data collection, and scanning services for the Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, in the amount of$2,303,683 The Computerized Facility Record and Drawing System is being designed to increase District staff productivity and to improve delivery of capital projects. These improvements are made possible by providing an automated means of storing and accessing accurate engineering information and by computerizing workflow. The project includes: development of a computerized facilities atlas; an electronic document management system (EDMS), and implementation of automated (paperless) engineering workflows. The original Scope of Work included: estimates of computer-aided drafting; document scanning and data collection requirements; as well as an assumption of existing data quality. As the project has progressed, additional tasks have been identified that are needed to complete the system and ensure that it will function as intended. Proposed Addendum No. 2 includes additional work to: 1. Increase the number of utility tunnel cross section drawings to be developed and verified for the treatment plant facility atlas. 2. Increase the number of documents to be included in the EDMS database and the amount of detail required to index them. 3. Improve integration with other business office software and improve the capability to view and manipulate files. X Mp®Wpvtl.lBa,O Ate.RW+tiVON BWC Ap.M.Rpa¢tlWF.m 1�.M R..u.¢ eaove Page 1 The proposed cost for Addendum No. 2 is $459,703 for a total Professional Services Agreement (PSA) amount of$2,768,384. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The addendum amount and budget necessary for Addendum No. 2 are presented in the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: sec 8, page 121) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Sufficient funds are available in the project budget to cover the proposed Addendum No. 2. The attached Budget Information Table shows $459,703 moving from the contingency phase to the implementation contract phase to cover the cost of Addendum No. 2, with no change to the overall project budget amount. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following is an explanation of the proposed work for Addendum No. 2. Utility Tunnel Piping Cross Section Drawings The original Scope of Work required the Consultant to prepare computer aided drafting for 500 tunnel cross sections. These cross section drawings depict the plant piping and utilities running throughout both plants. A cross section drawing is required at each utility tunnel segment where there is a change in piping configuration. Operations, Maintenance and Engineering designers will rely on these drawings for accurate "as- built° information. During development of the Facilities Atlas, it became apparent that 480 additional cross section drawings are required to accurately depict the utility tunnels at both plants. The proposed cost for additional utility tunnel drawings is $252,483. Document Scanninq and Indexing The original Scope of Work included scanning and indexing an estimated 100,000 8 'h -inch by 11-inch ("A" size) documents and 12,000 24-inch by 36-inch ("D" size) drawings and adding them to the document database. To complete the database, an additional 126,000 "A" size documents will need to be scanned, indexed and added to the document database. The original PSA also provided for indexing documents based on four categories (attributes). During testing of the document retrieval system, Staff and Consultants also determined that additional index attributes are required to more efficiently access information. The proposed cost for scanning additional documents and using more attributes is $169,720. \Y.NntlablMy.Eh\apeNalBmlE/.peM.Rryv¢ �M M1peM.ReprdpM' Ilan 19R�.6Y R....e: ermm Page 2 Data Integration " The original Scope of Work required the project to use the latest version of the FileNET Document Management System. The latest release (January 2000), does not include the product integration capabilities that were expected when the project started. Additionally, the FileNET document viewer will not accommodate editing (mark-ups) in the District's document formats. Staff recommends replacing the FileNET viewer with a third party viewer that provides the ability to mark-up documents in District's format. Without these capabilities, added steps will be necessary to save documents in the system, preventing the District from realizing the productivity improvement goals of the project. In addition, the automated Board Agenda Report (CBAS) process requires modification in order to be integrated with the new document management system. Additional minor customization of the FileNET application is required to provide consistency for users to aid in acceptance and uniform use of the system by Staff. The proposed cost for additional data integration work is $37,500. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve Addendum No. 2. If the additional work is not authorized, the facility atlas drawings would be incomplete, the document management system functions would not be fully integrated, and the District would not fully realize the potential productivity and quality improvements from the project. CEQA FINDINGS None Required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal letter dated Feb 7, 2000 from CFI DLM:jak:jo:jak ,wmms,�w.aaay.b.�ap�e.n�nuom e®a n�m nepwa�wmx +a(y m n. „ Page 3 f BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COMPUTERIZED FACILITY RECORDS AND DRAWING SYSTEM JOB NO. J-25-1 _ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED --FUNDS ' ' THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED . PROJECT .BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL ,EXPENDITURE EXPENDED.. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE .BUDGET '- TO.DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TODATE - TO DATE(%) Pro ect Development $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 126.000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 100% SUS $ 605.000 $ 1.154,750 $ 1.154,750 111 1.154,750 $ 1.154,750 $ 572,743 50% Consultant PSA $ 288,500 $ 288.500 $ 288,500 $ 288,500 $ 98,000 34% Implementation Contract $ 2,200,000 $ 2,328.681 $ 459,703 $ 2788.384 $ 2328,681 $459703 $ 2,788,384 $ 1,005,585 36% Implementation Other $ 150,000 $ 478.000 $ 478,000 $ 478,000 $ 478,000 $ 69.403 15% Conlin an $ 581,319 $459,703 $ 121,616 TOTAL $ 3,080,000 1 $ 4,956,250 1 1 $ 4.956,250 $ 4,374,931 $ 459,703 $ 4.834,634 $ 1,870,731 39% H.\a .alalea4UOBS a CONTR CTSII-2&IU-2&1 CFKJ251 udPla 1ixi,J 2xIsID1s1dds Professional Services Agreement Status Report COMPUTERIZED FACILITY RECORDS AND DRAWING SYSTEM Job No. J-25.1 Total Project Budget: $4,956,300 Consultant: Computerized Facility Intergration Start Date of Project: 10/04/90 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 5/26/99 Original PSA Design and Implement EDMS, Workflows, $2,303,683 $2,303,683 Facility Atlas 3/00 'Addendum Additional Scanning and Indexing $24,998 $2,328,681 No. 1 4/00 Proposed Tunnel Sections, Scanning & Indexing, and $459,703 $2,788,384 Integration GM Approved H*p.dlalengUOBS&CONTRACTSU-25-1U-25-1 CFIU.2&1 PSA Shills RepoMadd k2.doo 03/20/00 ReWs 05/14/98 Job J-25-1 Project J-25-1 Addendum No. 2 February 7, 2000 Dennis May; Project Manager - Peter Haas, Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Computerized Facility Data Management System Job No. J-25-1, Addendum No. 2 Gentlemen: As discussed, we are requesting a contract addendum to include additional scope items in Job No. J-25-1. These items result from Staff interviews and meetings held between August 1999 and February 2000, covering system functionality, or from discovery of higher data quantities than specified in the J-25-1 Request for Proposal. The following three sections provide a brief of the original scope intent and the requirements discovered todate: 1. Facility Atlas Tunnel Cross Section Quantity 2. Document Scanning and Indexing for EDMS: 2.1. Increase required attributes of Project files located in Engineering and Construction areas. 2.2. Inclusion of Connection Permits in the scanning and indexing process. 2.3. Inclusion of Shop Drawings in the scanning and indexing process. 2.4. Inclusion of Tunnel Sections in the scanning and indexing process. 3. System Integration of EDMS Tools: 3.1. Internet Explorer integration enhancement to FileNET EDMS. 3.2. Replacement of the FileNET Viewer with an alternate product. 3.3. Agenda Process Modifications 3.4. Modification to FileNET The recommendations, following review of various options, depends partially on whether the learning curve of the Staff should be considered early in the adoption phase of this newer technology. In other words, change management is made less difficult by providing more functionality to the user community, to offset the effort to learn new procedures. The options selected will provide major usability enhancements early in the roll out of the technology, even though at some point in the future the vendor may choose to incorporate these features. The changes to the scope also include the actual quantities of items that will support early adoption by the Staff. For example, if only half of the tunnel cross sections are created and stored in the EDMS and available via the Facility Atlas, then the Staff will likely not use the new tool, but continue operating in a paper-based approach. OCSD J-254 Letter Addendum a02 vi 1 March B.2000-0CSD-0RA100 J-25.1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 Page 2 of 7 W item* a egory escnp ion unne Cross e c ion to tala canning Projectes nning PermitFiles canning op ravngs canning unne Sections Web-basedice integration Replacement or a viewer Agenda ProcessModifications er mo ca Sysint ions o une i e client $ 7,500 eeommen Addendum Table 1 : Summary of Addendum Items Please contact us at your earliest convenience to review or discuss these items in more detail. Sincerely, 4-4111� Kendall Alton TeamCFl J-25-1 Project Manager Cc: TeamCFl File: /OCSD J-25-1 Letter Addendum #02.doc J-25-1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 Page 3 of 7 V 1 Facility Atlas Tunnel Cross Section Quantity: The Facility Atlas (FA) data collection effort, as described in the Contract Scope of Work, was based on an estimated 10 sections per tunnel for 50 tunnels at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, or 500 cross section.As we previously discussed, additional cross sections are required to fully document the piping configuration within the tunnels. After review of the District provided cross sections, TeamCFl has determined that 720 sections were sketched by the District to document changes in piping configuration for only 45 of a total of 53 tunnels (Average of 16 Sections per tunnel). This is 220 sketches more than specified in the scope of work. Additionally, 26 tunnels or tunnel segments have no cross sections documenting the piping configuration. If we assume that we will capture and verify an average of 10 Sections per tunnel for the remaining 26 undocumented tunnel segments, sufficient to represent all configuration changes for tunnels specified by Dennis May, then that adds 260 more, for a total number of 980 sections. Therefore, this scope of work should show that TeamCFl will field verify the 220 additional, existing sketches provided by the District; and will field inspect, create field sketches, create CAD drawings, and incorporate into the Facility Atlas, approximately 260 tunnel sections. The associated costs for these tasks are presented below: unnel Cross bectionsi Acaeoa or UIR vec Costs i-Wilto Fielden Fj—eFdZFeTcV— AdffTo roec anagemen - 0 It is expected that the data collection effort would begin on May 1, 2000 and be completed by February 28, 2001. J-25.1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 Page 4 of 7 2 Document Scanning and Indexing for EDMS Discussion: After evaluating the way in which documents are typically located and referred to by District Staff, it was found that more attributes (cross-indexing information)than included in the original scanning cost estimate were necessary. Increasing the number of attributes speeds document retrieval, but increases the initial scanning effort for legacy documents. In addition, the number of A-size (8'F,x 11) documents originally provided in the Black&Veatch 1994 report was below current quantities. The cost shown below allows TeamCF1 to provide the attributes that District Staff typically use when currently retrieving paper documents and to include the additional quantity of documents. Document Scanning Item Descriptions: Item 1 thru 6—Project files contain documents pertinent to active Engineering projects. Most of the files reside in the Design Engineering area in the Administration building, but files for projects currently under construction reside in the Construction trailers. Item 7 thru 8 —Connection Permits are trunk connection permits issued and maintained by Construction. The District 7 Sewer Connection Permits have been completed. Items 9 thru 10—Shop Drawings are detail drawings for fabrication of construction components, usually prepared by the construction contractor, subcontractor, or fabricator. Items 11 thru 12—Tunnel Sections are elevation drawings showing piping configurations at various locations along a tunnel. _ J-25-1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 Page 5 of 7 c J-25-1 Estimate to Complete ASize Scanning m cumen t Qtv Scan$ n ex 7.�771, soeux ^nY Y 6,: r .77,:. a:ey gmeo n9 an as cannugimages ;..; indexing multipage en s: 2 7 atldbulm, 180 cherectem;Filename(12), Projecta(8),OwTYpe(20),Classification(48), Date(12),Amlwr(32),Tela(48) 15,000 1.80 27,000 FORIffir p u comitnetson Location Filoux scanning images 8 und"ing mu ipage documents: 7 aflribules, 150 chamclem 3,000 1.801 5,400 FOOff Pep a ng u eet es e arm - na em canning images 8 e an , i Perm110(6),Tmnk(17),Contmebali).Slalion(8) E2,5DD 0.50 I.M) PWIM t es oP unevings u i-sae, sae, a n nue , c Filename(12),Ioeallon(16).Paijactp(8), 18 Specificalien No.(16),Desctlplim(48), Menufaclum(24),Supplier(26),Ama Number(8), Dale(12),Hard Copy lucelbn(16) 3,000 1.64 5,620 Shop ngs o - unne,bections sae,singe s 12 rg. a n Tunnel Clltla(3),Stalian(5) 977 0.78 756 unn ona o Gmntl Total b Complete AShe Scanning= $ 169,456 J-25-1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 _ Page 6 of 7 W 3 System Integration of EDMS Tools Discussion: 3.1. Desktop/MS Office Integration with FileNet The original scope stipulated that the EDMS be the latest version of the FileNET Document Management System. Additional stipulations were that the final system be based on off-the- shelf software, and that it be web-based to the greatest extent possible. Final selection of the EDMS product was based on a review of marketing materials for the latest FileNET version (Jan'00), which had not been released at the time of the original bid process (Feb'99). In Feb'99, the vendor claimed integration between the product's thin (web)-client and the MS Office suite; however, when the product was finally released in Jan '00, it did not include the product integration expected. Although the EDMS will allow users to store and access MS Office documents in the EDMS, there are limitations, including: • Users cannot save documents directly into the EDMS from an MS Office application using a menu option. Instead, they must save the document to the local disk drive, exit the application, and then use the EDMS web-based interface to add the document to the EDMS. • Users cannot link EDMS attributes (cross-indexing information) into an MS Office document. This means that document headers and footers cannot automatically include EDMS attributes, as is currently done with MS Office document templates. This then requires additional effort for the user to find the document at a later date. Although the product's standard desktop version does support these operations, the current web-based version does not. Based on information from the vendor on February 19, 2000, some of these capabilities will be provided in the next release of the product's web-based version (expected in 3-6 months), with additional enhancements being offered in subsequent releases (typical release cycles are 3-6 months). At this time, TeamCFl recommends that we implement a temporary custom integration between the FileNET web-client and the MS Office application suite. TeamCFl believes that this integration can be implemented pending resolution of two technical issues currently preventing it. We are working with FileNET to determine a limited, near-term solution that will, at minimum, allow users to easily save documents directly into the FileNET EDMS without having to implement a procedural workaround, and at best, allow linking document attributes to document headers and footers. 3.2. FileNet Viewer Replacement The off-the-shelf viewer software that is provided with the FileNET EDMS provides viewing support for all of the file formats in use at the District. It also includes the ability to markup TIFF images which make up the majority of the documents that will be in use for the near-term. It does not allow mark up of other document formats, which is contrary to what the vendor's product documentation indicated. Although the current viewer features and format support is adequate for the District's basic needs, as users review the system and realize its potential, additional features will be required. To provide these features, TeamCFl proposes replacing the off-the-shelf viewer, with a third-party viewer that provides these additional features. TeamCFl believes that doing so will provide the District users with additional productivity enhancements. To replace the existing viewer will require custom integration between FileNET and the third- party viewer so that users will be able to easily open EDMS documents, create markups, and save these markups to the EDMS. J-25-1 Addendum No. 02 February 7, 2000 Page 7 of 7 3.3. Agenda Process Modifications The existing CBAS Agenda Process uses a custom meeting-planning database and several customized document templates. For these to work with the EDMS some modifications to the templates and the database are necessary. 3.4. Modification to FileNET Minor refinements or modifications to the off-the-shelf FileNET application are recommended, such as multiple file selection and tool-tip labeling. This provides consistency or clarity for users which aids in system acceptance and use. Let REMM ption Nrs RetalHr Total Comment t iceProvide i eve-o- ie an ie pen-rom- ie menu selections forward end Excel. = viewer e a n a win vewer oes no prov a ma ups or non- image files.Panizoom features am not effective. cess en a rep e s an a seam necessarys integmm with the EDMS. a s o mu ip e a se ec;prow a consis en u on a e ing annt funciton,etc. PDCCOMMITTEE Neetlngoae ToW.ofDr. 04/O6/00 4/76/0o AGENDA REPORT z r IbemNumbe Rem Number axoo-sxn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jonathan K. Thomsic, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PLANT AUTOMATION & REINVENTION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-42 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science Inc. for Plant Automation & Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services, for an additional amount of$420,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $5,516,830. SUMMARY Virtual tags: An earlier J-42 Addendum, No. 3, provided permanent, physical tagging of instrumentation and equipment for the treatment plants, but did not address the tags used by the computerized control systems. The computerized control system tags are commonly known as "virtual tags". A virtual tag is used in the plant-wide computer program to hold data and make decisions on how process equipment is to be operated. This Addendum allocates $390,000 for the following: • Establish a virtual tag naming convention for all drawings • Review and update all drawings to the new standard • Develop a system that allows universal viewing of the drawings • Provide systems documentation and training The virtual tag effort is the last link needed to make a coordinated, easily accessed, plant-wide system of identification. Additional tagging funds: Addendum No. 2 provided funds to purchase 37,000 instrument and equipment tags. The proposed tags were examined by Staff during the initial tagging workshops and the tag construction was deemed inadequate for the harsh plant environment. Addendum No. 5 provides an additional $30,000 to upgrade the quality of the instrument and equipment tags. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This Addendum transfers $420,000 from the contingency budget to the Consultant PSA budget, and authorizes an increase of the Consultant PSA funds from $5,096,830 to $5,516,830. See the attached Budget Information Table. Y" BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CAd) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, was created to: (1) develop documentation for the existing automation and controls systems; (2) provide a workshop format for the reinvention of plant operation and automation; and (3) develop and implement plant automation to an optimum level. Through this project, the operation and maintenance of the District's two treatment plants will be reinvented to: • Provide Operations with data that is currently not available, which will allow optimal process control and operation. • Provide Maintenance with information to better manage and maintain plant equipment and controls. • Reduce operating costs through more efficient chemical usage and reduced staffing levels by application of automation and centralized monitoring and control. • Provide for a more efficient and cost-effective design process because of the development of accurate and up-to-date information about existing conditions. Virtual tags: An essential element of the documentation system as well as the asset management system is consistent, unique instrument and equipment identification. Currently several independent identification schemes coexist in the plants. Many instruments and equipment items are not identified in the field. The need for consistent tags was recognized during the contract negotiations with Parsons and was added to the Scope of Work subsequent to the receipt of proposals. The Scope and cost for tagging was initially negotiated into the contract. The tagging clauses were removed from the contract when Parsons and the Board reverted to the original contract price and Scope of Work during the award of the original contract. Additional funds were required to allow instrument and equipment tagging to proceed. Addendum No. 3 was approved by the Board in August 1999, and addressed the physical tagging of instruments and equipment. Addendum No. 3 to the J-42 contract started synchronizing all the identification databases by creating a single, permanent identification number. Addendum No. 3 will mark approximately 37,000 field items with the new identification number. The computer control system side of tagging was not addressed by Addendum No. 3. This Addendum No. 5 provides $390,000 for Consultant costs to support the standardization of the computer tags used within the control system. These computer tags are commonly referred to as "virtual tags" because they exist in the computer system and not necessarily in the plant. Virtual tags are used within the computer control system to hold the data and make the calculations for controlling the process equipment. This Addendum will complete the universal, permanent tagging effort described and initiated in Addendum No. 3. This effort will synchronize the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Process Controls Integration (PC I) database to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) database and to the Engineering database/drawing set. The development of an easy system for finding and viewing the intelligent drawings created by J-42, as well as associated documentation, such as CMMS equipment records and PC[ database entries will be completed. The documentation used to understand and troubleshoot the new and modified software programs will also be developed. Finally, training and training documentation for the software systems will be developed. Additional tagging funds: Addendum No. 2 provided $65,490 for the purchase of 37,000 identification tags to be mounted on field equipment. Addendum No. 2 also funded a series of workshops to develop methods and procedures for tagging process instruments and equipment. Workshop participants examined the tag materials as well as the depth of the etched characters. The participants decided the tag would not be rugged enough for the harsh environment of the plant and selected an identification tag material and engraving procedure that has proved more durable in the plant environment. The selected tag is more costly than the tag proposed in Addendum No. 2. This Addendum No. 5 will provide the additional $30,000 required to upgrade the physical tags. ALTERNATIVES No other alternatives have been identified as this project represents the recommendations of the DART process. CEOA FINDINGS This addendum is exempt from CEQA requirements per CEQA Section 15262. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report JT:jo:jak H:Mxp.dtMagenda%Soard Agenda Reporta1R000 Board Agenda RepMs`0400Vtem 130).doc K BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Addendum No. 5 JOB NO. J-42 I G ORIQIf�'AL CUM 1 � PttO11� P P0`�EO FUNDS PROJECTRASI( AUTRORDY+O DUOD �H/ISED AUTHdR D •KyTo11 (ONs Ai. PX� �, BUDGET PROJECT elIF7ORT INCR SE gtI1fOET •'•S'O DA ,� + AUItTIPtN e � " , a I - �.'� r; u-• 'I '.1' �o,: `,i:.o . .fit 11N'.� Project Development $ 185,180 $ 185,180 $ 185,180 $ 185,180 $ 185.180 $ 185.000 100% Design Staff $ 2,961,531 $ 3,333,531 1 $ 3,333,531 $ 3,333,531 $ 3,333,631 1$ 722,000 22% Consultant PSA $ 4,383,400 $ 5,096,830 $ 420,000 $ 5.516.830 $ 5,096,830 $ 420.000 $ 5,516.830 $ 2,940,125 53% Construction Contract $ 8,696,472 $ 8,696,472 $ 8,696,472 - $ 0% Construction Other $ 600,000 $ 000.000 $ 600.000 $ 0% Construction Staff $ 4,030,000 $ 4,030,000 $ 4,030,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 4,903.417 $ 3,817,987 1 $ (420,000)1 $ 3.397,987 1 $ 0% TOTAL $ 25,760,000 1 $ 25.760.000 1 $ - 1 $ 25,760,000 $ 8,615,541 1 $ 420.000 $ 9,035.541 1$ 3.847,125 HM poftaWgVOSS a COWMCTBV42 Pleet Rela"rdl %cdendum 5-Phase 2Ams 10 a 20gBudget Table Add 05.xispsded, F"RNIW I V17188 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Plant Reinvention/Automation Project Job/Contract No. J-42 Total Project Budget: $25,760,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 27, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs J-42 is the Plant Reinvention and Automation Project that will increase plant automation to an 5/27/1998 Original optimum level. It is a capital project that will $4,383,400 $4,383,400 PSA implement physical changes to the plant process control systems and equipment to support both Operations and Maintenance 4/1/1999 1` Provide facilitator for Area 10/20 Workshop 1 $16,500 $4 399,900 7/21/1999 2 Additional Miscellaneous Services $80 537 $4 480 437 7/21/1999 3 Plant Tagging Services $616 393 $5,096 830 10/26/1999 1 4' Correction to Agreement Language $0 $5,096,830 Pending 5 1 Phase 2 Preliminary and Virtual Tags $420 000 $5,516,830 ' GM Approval o:aiyensivy.ms w.n wywuocwz,w waeoo.em wwwa Page 4 Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 12. 2000. 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 12, 2000 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Directors Absent: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair Mark A. Murphy Mark Leyes, Vice Chair Jan Debay, Board Chair Shawn Boyd Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair John M. Gullixson Shirley McCracken STAFF PRESENT: James W. Silva Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager OTHERS PRESENT: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Don Hughes Maintenance Toby Weissen - Gary Streed, Director of Finance Ryal Wheeler Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Mike White, Controller Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Jim Burror, Project Manager Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Ryal Wheeler, a District employee, voiced concern with the Distrcl's mediator, ADR, and possible conflicts with grievance procedures contained within the memorandum of understandings. He was also concerned with solicitations by ADR to District employees for mediation services. He requested that the FAHR Committee provide oversight on the contract with ADR. Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources, stated that staff has taken steps to make sure that ADR does not initiate or solicit mediation with employees. e Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting V Page 2 April 12, 2000 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the minutes of the March 8, 2000 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Director John Gullixson abstained. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported on SB 1956, sponsored by Senator Polanco. This bill would prohibit local government from enacting or enforcing an ordinance that is more restrictive than either the Federal 503 regulations or any state requirements that may emerge that regulates biosolids unless local government can show there is a public health or environmental need. Staff will be requesting the Board at the April 261" meeting to consider adopting a resolution in support of SB1956. Mr. McIntyre then stated that several bills are being developed for urban runoff and watershed management. Staff will keep the Directors apprised as these bills develop. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, reported that escrow should close the end of April for the purchase of property in Kings County for biosolids application. A multiple-year composting contract is currently moving through the conditional use permit process in Kern County. Mr. Anderson also reported the Little Hoover Commission, comprised of 13 members appointed by the Governor, Assembly and Senate, was preparing a report on all special districts within California. Hearings are scheduled to be held on June 14 and August 26. The report is expected to contain findings that special districts are not accountable to their communities, reserves are excessive, not well planned or justified, and property tax allocations need to be adjusted. Blake stated that he spoke at length to the Commission recently regarding the District's strategic future planning. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed reported that the District's short-term portfolio had a technical non-compliance of about$475,000. A fund was downgraded from A-to BBB+on the last day of the month, thus PIMCO had no opportunity to get out of that fund before the report was published. PIMCO has an analyst at Finova Capital going over the books. It was special accounting charges and expenses that put the fund in this situation. Staff is satisfied that PIMCO is taking the appropriate steps. Technically, however, this is a violation of the District's investment policy. It was further reported that the Operations and Maintenance budget is in draft forth and will be discussed next month. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 April 12, 2000 Mr. Streed fuller reported that a letter had been received from the mayor of Garden Grove, addressed to the District's Chair, urging the Directors not to vote for the consolidation of the user fees. The consolidation of rates issue will be placed on the agenda for the April 21P regular board meeting. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications reported that the Orange County Register has a mobile newsroom that travels around the county. Jeff Kramer, a humor columnist, will be staffing the newsroom and has requested a visit to the District. Ms. Tuchman then reported on the formation of a Community Advisory Committee on Odor Control. Letters of invitation to be a member of the committee were sent to numerous residents and businesses in the four cities most impacted by odors generated by the plants: Huntington Beach; Fountain Valley; Costa Mesa; and Newport Beach. The first meeting was held on April 1 P. Two residents attended from the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association and the West Newport Beach Association. Because the response to the formation of the Committee was limited, a contingency plan has been developed to reach more of the impacted residents, such as an open house and specialty meetings with those associations. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items a-c) a. FAHR00-26: Receive and file Treasurees Report for the month of March 2000. The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance with the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. b. FAHR00-27: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR00-28: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 21, 2000. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for Hems specified as 12(a) through (c) under Consent Calendar. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting f Page 4 April 12, 2000 (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-b) a. FAHR0O-29: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD OD--, Authorizing Formation of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation and Authorizing Certain Related Actions. Steve Kozak gave a progress report on the restructure of the District's certificates of participation and a brief overview of the formation of the District's financing corporation. Directors then entered into discussion regarding possible conflict of interest and the bylaws of the District and the financing corporation. Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to approve staffs recommendation. b. FAHR00-30: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00._, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Updating Human Resources Policies and Procedures. Lisa Tomko gave a brief overview of the policy sections being updated, and minor clarifications in addition to what was included in the Directors' package. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (14) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR00-31: Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73 Jim Herberg gave an update on the District's cooperative projects program. (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none (17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for May 10, 2000 at 5 p.m. (18) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 18(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:38 p.m. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 April 12, 2000 Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(1). At 7:10 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (19) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: v 0/1 - J Penny M. 1 FAHR Committee Se t ry H.l p.dtalagendaVAHRIFAHR200012000 Mtn 3041200 FANR M/N.d FAHR COMMITTEE MeeUng Date I To ea.ofDir. 04/12/00 N/26/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number /sruC'co 212 1 iu/c 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O00 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2000. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) �nm�me rwv m.u"¢+mv,�wrwmr,naaao,+pmmmmr.nmm w..a: nrn+.e:arzasa Page 1 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ,• Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts March 31,2000 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAID $ 21,775.271 5.8 Union Bank Checking Account 387.204 — Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,130,000 5.2 PIMCO—Short-tens Portfolio 19,675,168 5.6 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 347,848,151 4.1 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2.010 5.8 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,155,893 6.2 Petty Cash 8,000 — TOTAL $423,981.697 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report .d.�...11.mau�¢rOe neTAnRuanaaoOuo Trea:Urar:Radon roardd ft�.. &29e Page 2 District Fund Balances II'llllll 1. IMEM �O'000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ !i i i�/ *32*32•1 FORM,?. &NZ WK 'i'i�i'i i�i�i'i i �i'i'i'i' 'i�i�i'i �i i i i�i !��•������ / 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 lj����0�0� i����44� ♦•••� •••�� i..♦♦ �i�i�i'O� i�i�i�i�i1 iii���i1 �•iiii, ii•�ii, .........1 ♦�•�•••�•/ • � - 11 - . 11 11 F 1 . MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 March 2000) Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $19,671,956 • Mellon $19,675,168 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $19,695,733 • Mellon $19,696,183 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.25 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impart(gainfloss)of l%Change: S49,715 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 66% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio CreditQuality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": See Note 15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE ..In Compliance" See Note 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.50 0.47 3 Months: 1.54 1.35 12 Months: 5.51 4.99 Year-to-Date: 1.54 1.35 Commentary • Internet rates ar the shoacnd ofthe yield curve rose slightly in March(thme-month T-Bills up 9 basis points to 5.88%).while the longend posted positive tend returns. • The Liquid portfolio outperformed its benchmark by 3 beat points in March. • PIMCO's emphasis on corporates end commercial paper slightly enhanced am=. • NOSE: On March 31,2000,S&P doumgreded Pinson Capitol Corp.from A-so BBB+with a stable Outlook,due to the parent company's(Finova Group,Inc.)announcement ofa special accounting charge m earnings. A Finova Capiol Corporates Note,S475,000 per amount.6.375%coupon,mmudng on October 15,2000,Is held in the Liquid Opuming Monies portfolio. The note sound.about 2.4%ofthe marly$20mil11anportmBo. PIMCO has undertakenappmpdam steps to analyse Necredit end will advise the District as to disposition ofine security in compliance with the District's Investment Policy. N:L.£)NAAC6I...NEn/SfD[/Qa)aaMT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ending 31 March 2000) Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $347,943,513 • Mellon $347,848,151 Historical Cost: $349,466,057 • PIMCO $350,233,364 • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.17 Of Index: 2.29 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,629,724 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 40% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance- Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.99 0.78 3 Months: 1.63 127 12 Months: 3.52 3.07 Year-to-Date: 1.63 1.27 CO--Iary • While rhea od yields(one-year and less)cos,slightly in March Qhreamonth T-Bills up 9 basis point m 5.89%).yields on longer melmWes declined(five-yeaTreasury Now down 28 basis points 632%),porting positive toW that. • The Long-Term portfolio outperfomed it benchmark by 21 basis point in March. • PIMCO's mnphasis on imemeAtte memrirks(2 so 5 Years)added m mums as long-lono inmrest mess declined. • PIMCO's corporate,seariry selemWm,and decision to hold mortgage securities,added to relative morn. H:L..IFMAACn1/a...aTl'ISFD Lm)W APT Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-MAR-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS PAYABLES -611,460.00 -611,460.00 -3.07-A 0.00 TOTAL -611,460.00 -611,460.00 -3.07% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,672,177.75 2,672,177.75 13.44% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 1,785,494.33 1,785,494.33 8.98% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 2,077,894.59 2,077,894.58 10.45% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THN IYR 3,766,940.00 3,766,940.00 18.94% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 82,985.93 82,985.93 0.42% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 10,385,482.59 10,385,482.59 52.220A 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,774,022.59 9,774,022S9 49.14% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 3,493,457.03 3,484,145.00 17.52% 687.97 U.S.AGENCIES 999,200.00 1,000,000.00 5.03% 800.00 ABS:CAR LOAN 905,913.00 901,701.00 4.53% -4,212.00 BANKING&FINANCE 1,497,145-50 1,495,420.25 7.52% .1,725.25 INDUSTRIAL 2,028,520.00 2,016,004.00 10.14% -12,516.00 UTILITY-GAS 495,845.00 496,515.00 - 2.50% 670.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 512,080.00 507,360.00 2.55% -4,720.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,922,160.53 9,901,145.25 49.78% -21,015.28 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES �9. 22.1605 9,901,145.23 49.78% -21,015.28 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 213,381.78 213,381.78 1.07% 0.00 TOTAL 213,381.78 213,381.78 1.07% 0.00 10-Apr-2000 9:11:07 Erecullm Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-MAR-2000 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAMLOSS TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 213,381.78 213M1.78 1.07% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 191909.SN.90 19,0 SXF9.02 100.00% -21,01538 10-Aprv2000 9.11:07 Eeew&l Wo kbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE., i BASE' USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2000 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 7,496,098.35 7,496,09835 2.13% 0.00 PAYABLES 45,173,650.42 45,179,650.42 .12.86% 0.00 TOTAL -37,682,552.07 -37,68Z552.07 -10,72% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 50,273,952.40 50,273,852.40 14.31% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 18,035,097.78 18,035,087.78 5.13% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THN IYR 11,978,460.69 11,978,460.69 3.41% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,112,352.49 1.1 I2,352.49 0.32% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES $1,399,753.36 91,399,753.36 23.16% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 43,717,20129 T 12.44% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 101,587,357.65 101,173,314.69 29.79% 413,942.96 U.S.AGENCIES 76,465,768.35 75,981,579.61 21.62% 494,198.74 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,799,219.76 16,866,925.00 4.80% 67,606.24 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,528,930.75 3,490,167.26 0.99% -33,763.49 FHLMC POOLS 9,144,340.51 8,938,695.74 2.54% -205,644.77 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,965,362.01 7,717,962.20 220% -247,999.91 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 45.021.05 44,936.42 0.01% -94.63 ADS:HOME EQUITY 377,576.09 376,511.33 0.11% -1,064.76 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 2,849,782.94 2,851,999.29 0.81% 2,116.35 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,000,000.00 986,460.00 0.28% -13,540.00 BANKING&FINANCE 66,983,810.20 66,627,940.50 18.96% -355,869.70 INDUSTRIAL 7,126,189.00 6,815,542.30 1.94% -310,646.70 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 5,145,550.00 4,945,290.00 1.41% -200,260.00 U77LITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,314,225.00 708% -193,030.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 306,516,162.31 304,130,949.34 86.55% -2,385,212.97 TOTAL FRIED INCOME SECURITIES 306.516,16231 304,130,94934 86.55% -2,385,212.9E 10-Apr 2000 9:12:57 Executive Wa Abemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2000 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,558,671.68 3,558,671.68 1.01% 0.00 TOTAL 3,558,671.68 3,558,671.68 1.01% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,558,671.68 3,558,671.68 1.01% wm NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 353,792,035.28 351,406,822.31 100.00% -2XS,21L97 10-Apr-2000 9.12.57 Eve lm Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE x 1 OCSF01511102 2000/03/31 RUN DATE x 04/06/00 DISTRICTx LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIMC x 13.20.16 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MAMMET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 6-P PRICE ERHART VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 92,995.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NO" .000 5.629 AM 100.000 3 ]95.93 19960B52tl AM B2r90 .3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOW LN BE CONE DISC H 5.851 .000 P-1 99.130 3,766,940.00 36.27 313384VE9 HAT 04/24/2000 A-11 3,766,940.00 18.57 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC 5.858 .000 P-1 99.097 1,208,261.00 12.40 313396MA7 MAT 04/25/2000 INCOME AT HAT A-14 1,286,261.00 6.35 900,000.00 XEROX CORD DISC 5.BB5 .000 P-1 99.061 891,546.50 B.58 90412CDCO 04/12/2000 891,546.50 4.39 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.892 .000 P-1 98.947 2,0]],694.58 20.00 313580M80 MAT 05/11/2000 A-I+ 2,0]],894.58 10.24 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTC CORP DISC 5.913 .000 P-1 99.445 497,223.33 4.18 313396VT7 MAT 04/18/2000 A-14 457,223.33 2.45 900,000.00 DAINLERCHRYLSER DISC 5.941 .000 99.149 892,343.00 8.59 233020M1 04/10/2000 992,343.00 4.40 900,000.00 GOLDNAN SACHS GROUP L P DISC 6.008 .000 P-1 98.699 880,288.25 8.55 38242TEQ4 05/24/2000 888,288.25 4.30 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.794 .072 10,385,492.59 100.00 10,385,492.59 $1.19 FILED INCOME SECURITIES 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN MSG CORP DEW .000 4.705 AAA 100.000 999,200.00 10.09 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/18/2000 DO 05/18/99 AAA 11000,000.00 4.93 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.112 5.149 AAA 99.547 3,493,457.03 35.18 912B274Q2 05.1251 00/31/2000 DO 06/31/98 AAA 3,484,145.00 17.17 475,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AVER 6.296 6.009 AA] 99.050 4]4,2]3.25 4.79 046001BL9 6.0006 06/15/2000 A4 474,325.50 2.34 900,000.00 FORD MTR CA MIN 9 TR 00538 6.312 ].00] Al IOO.1B9 505,913.00 9.10 345402YXI 7.020% 10/10/2000 DO 10/10/95 A 901,701.00 4.44 YLDAGtL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 2 MSF0751IL02 2000/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/00 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.20.16 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY RAMET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S—P PRICE RAREST VALUE S TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 400,000.00 LENNAN REDS NLU03 NTN TR 00252 6.353 6.416 A3 99.758 400,216.00 4.03 52517PLMI 1.4001 09/30/2000 OD 09/26/17 A 399,032.00 1.97 900,000.00 GBNEEAL RATES CORD NTS 6.425 9.480 A2 101.534 922,860.00 9.22 370442ANS 9.625% 12/01/2000 DD 12/01/90 A 913,806.00 4.50 150,000.00 MORGAN J P 6 CO NTN SR 00043 6.430 6.153 Al 99.546 149,625.00 1.50 61681YBUO 6.1251 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/97 AS 149,319.00 .74 600,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD HT 6.574 6.505 A3 99.920 599.760.00 6.05 812404MI 6.5001 06/15/2000 DD 06/13/95 A— 599,560.00 2.96 500,000.00 SUELINGTON RES INC MT 6.SI8 9.575 A3 100.526 505,900.00 5.07 122014AB9 9.6259 06/15/2000 DD 06/20/90 A— 502,630.00 2.40 500,000.00 WE CORP DES 6.669 9.239 BAAI 101.472 512,000.00 5.12 362320AD6 9.3350 12/01/2000 A 507,360.00 2.50 435,000.00 FINOVA CAP CORD 6.020 6.405 BAA1 99.525 473,031.25 4.77 318034AP8 6.335% 10/15/2000 DD 10/11/95 A— 472,743.75 2.33 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC SITS 4TR 00006 6.899 6.213 A3 99.303 495,045.00 5.03 90269DAF6 6.1301 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/98 A— 496,515.00 2.45 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.333 5.914 9,122,160.53 100.00 9o901.145.25 48.81 TOTAL S.S12 3.686 20,303,643.12 100.00 20,296,621.04 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 3 MSF07522202 2000/03/31 RUM DATE 04/06/00 DISMICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 1 13.20.16 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION HOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,112,352.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH WHY •DUD 5.629 AAA 100.000 1,112,352.49 1.36 996085143 AM 1,112,352.41 .29 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN DISCOUNT 5.859 .ODD P-1 99.001 91900,111.11 12.26 31358BNR3 HAWRES 05/04/2000 A-I♦ 91900,111.11 2.53 8.300,000.00 GENERAL BLEC CAP DISC 5.965 .ODD P-1 19.064 9,222,307.39 10.10 36959UD39 04/07/2000 81222,303.39 2.13 4,300,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 5.069 .000 P-1 98.999 4,256,973.72 5.22 44922ADA5 04/10/2000 4,256,973.72 1.10 10,200,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORD DISC 5.838 .000 P-1 99.094 18,035,083.38 22.15 313396MN2 HATURAS 03/09/2000 A-1♦ 18,035,087.78 4.60 700,000.00 DAIMLERCHRYLSER DISC 5.894 .000 99.254 694,336.44 .85 233DEODAI 04/10/2000 694,336.44 .18 14,000,000.00 XEROX CORD DISC 5.606 .000 P-1 99.012 13,061,699.45 13.02 98412COH9 04/17/2000 13,861,699.45 3.60 2,800,000.00 CIA (DELANM) DISC 5.913 .000 90.927 2,769,970.00 3.40 12470JD37 04/03/2000 2,769,970.00 .32 7,000,DDQ.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 6.009 .000 P-1 98.682 6,907,755.56 9.48 36959HEK9 05/19/2000 6,907,755.56 1.39 2,700,000.00 EASTMAN KODAK CO DISC 6.041 .000 P-1 98.B23 2,666,209.75 3.23 23346MJ4 05/18/2000 2,668,209.75 .69 600,000.00 USAA CAP CC" DISC 6.054 .000 P-1 98.107 591.642.00 .72 90320M65 06/06/2000 591,642.00 .15 5.300,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMR DISC 6.D7B .000 P-1 99.043 5,249,482.13 6.44 02225MC2 05/12/2000 5,249,482.17 1.36 4,700,000.00 USAA CM CORP DISC 6.OB6 .000 P-1 99.039 4,656,301.25 5.32 90328MF6 05/15/2000 4,656,701.25 1.21 400,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 6.157 .000 P-1 90.584 394,334.67 .48 61166AFE4 06/14/2000 394,334.67 .10 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF01522202 2000/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/06/00 DISTRICT[ LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 13.20.16 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 3 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD B-P PRICE HARAST VALUE 3 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- - ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DISCOUNT 13.393 .000 P-1 98.969 2,078,349.58 2.55 313588W4 MAT 04/20/2000 A-1. 2,038,349.58 .54 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.790 .122 81,399,751.36 100.00 01,399,753.36 21.11 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.DD BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.380 Al 100.130 1,992,800.00 .65 066365DM4 FLTG AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/99 A- 2,002,600.00 .52 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC HIS 9TR0061S .000 6.142 Al 100.031 3,498,635.00 1.15 17120QESO MW AT 08/09/2002 DO 04/09/9B A4 3,501,085.00 .91 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS .000 6.130 Al 100.049 2,994,300.00 .90 209111CUS MW AT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A4 3,001,470.00 .38 335,063.05 FHLMC GROUP 478-60i4 .000 6.475 AAA 98.594 326,B95.99 .10 313480NX3 6.3841 01/01/2020 W 12/01/97 AAA 330,352.06 .09 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CA CO GLOBAL HIS .000 6.243 Al 99.687 1,992,580.00 .65 345393RV3 FLTG AT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/58 A 1,993,740.00 .52 2,000,000.00 FORD MTT CA CO THAN ENHANCED .000 6.215 Al 99.921 1,998,613.60 .65 345397SCB PLTO AT O9/27/2006 DO O6/27/98 A9 1,998,420.00 .52 3,000,000.00 FORD NTH Cot CO GLOBAL LAmSmAm .000 6.356 Al 99.306 3,000,000.00 .98 345397ORS FLTG AT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A4 2,991,180.00 .38 3,000,000.00 GMAC NTH MEN AT .000 6.525 A2 100.343 3,010,830.00 .90 33042MV119 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/98 A 3,010,290.00 .78 3,000,000.00 GENERAL RUSH ACCEP 4TR 00562 .000 6.264 A2 99.921 2,996,430.DO .90 37042NKX0 FLTG AT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 2,997,630.00 .3B 3,950,000.00 GMAC HIS FLTG AT .000 5.513 A2 99.903 3,918,760.50 1.29 370425OVS 08/19/2003 DO O8/17/98 A 3,946,168.50 1.02 2,353,O98.21 GNM GTD RMMIC TR 2000-9 PB .000 6.333 AAA 99.8D1 2,353,08E.21 .10 383784NX9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 2,747,609.56 .71 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS .000 6.415 A3 100.196 2,000,000.00 .65 423328BKB MIS RT 06/25/2001 DO 06/25/19 A- 2,003,920.D0 .52 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 5 OCSFO7522202 2000/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/00 DISTRICTi LONG-TERM OPERATINO RUN TIME 23.20.11 PRO VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY M MET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MONEY VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL ME ITS. 00246 .000 6.306 A3 99.903 3,000,000.00 .00 42333HLF3 PLTG M 04/28/2003 US 04/27/91 A- 2,997,090.00 .78 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CO ME .000 6.410 A2 100.463 4,000,000.00 1.32 44181XXA5 MID RT 06/24/2003 ON 06/24/98 A 4,018,520.00 1.04 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN NTH SR 000570 .000 5.730 A2 100.234 999,188.90 .32 44181KST4 MW RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 A 1,002,340.00 .26 21300,000.00 LEUMAN NEW HLOGS MY, IN 00333 .000 6.056 A3 100.702 2,322,379.00 .76 52512PPN5 PLTG M 04/01/2002 US 03/29/99 A 2,316,146.00 .60 5,000,000.00 LEHMAS ERGS SLURS HIS .000 6.659 A3 100.218 5,000,000.00 1.64 52517PDO7 MID M 12/12/2002 ON, 12/07/99 A 5,010,900.00 1.30 1,700,000.00 MEGAN STMLEY ME #TR 00311 .000 6.167 AA 99.968 1,699,517.20 .55 61145BNY3 PLTO RT O1/2B/2002 DO O1/27/00 A4 11499,456.00 .44 2,855,918.71 STUDENT LN MKTR ARM 98-2 Al .000 5.997 AAA 99.059 2,849,702.94 .93 76442GNA3 MID RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/16/99 AAA 2,851,899.29 .74 9,636,896.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX M 3.703 3.636 AAA 99.303 0,607,476.19 2.93 9128233A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 AM 8,611,244.42 2.23 19,164,780.00 08 TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.821 3.504 AAA 96.312 10,515,997.63 6.06 912B212M3 3.335% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 AM 10,457,902.91 4.79 1,002,630.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 4.338 4.169 AAA 101.953 995,550.00 .33 9128275MB 4.2501001/15/2010 DO 01/15/00 AAA 1,022,211.31 .23 4,000,000.00 HORGAN STMLEY ME BTR 00299 5.170 5.463 M3 99.015 3,997,788.00 1.31 6174SCHLI MW M 04/15/2002 DD 04/15/99 A4 3,995,000.00 1.04 2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.294 6.389 AAA 99.793 2,167,321.15 .68 912821X54 06.3751 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 AAA 2,095,737.00 .54 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.613 10.165 AAA 116.02E 6,698,250.00 1.99 912010WO 11.8751 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 AM 6,075,056.00 1.58 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.599 M3 90.493 1,543,215.00 .49 046003HY0 6.5006 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 A4 1,432,395.00 .38 1,000,000.00 SELLER FINANCIAL INC HIS 5.760 5.990 A3 93.630 999,730.00 .32 42333HXJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 A- 976,300.00 .25 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 2000/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/00 DISTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 1 13.20.16 vvvevvvvevvevnevveuvnuevvvenen:vevvvvvvvvevvvvvevvvevuvuvvvuvnvvmvvvvcvvvvvveeeveevvvvvv ....nuvvvvvevevvvvavvvvvvvvvvevvvv PAR VALUE YTM AT CONSIST MOODY MEANT TOTAL C0ST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE EMERY VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ -----__--_ 2,005,000.00 ALMS ROEBUCK ACCEP COUP EYE 5.804 6.739 A3 97.046 2,060,739.00 .63 812400ON6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,945,772.30 .50 23,430,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.807 5.696 AAA 98.750 23,351,289.85 7.60 91202750/ 05.625% 01/30/2001 DO 09/30/99 AM 23,137,125.00 6.00 5,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.279 AAA 99.531 5,006,402.25 1.63 9128272LS 06.2501 02/20/2002 DD 02/28/97 AM 4,976,550.00 1.29 3,000,000.00 SIMS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP HTH 5.849 6.782 A3 97.765 3,073,170.00 .96 81240QJA1 6.630% 07/09/2002 DD 07/D9/97 A- 2,932,950.00 .76 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBARR CBNRECT2E N C HIS 5.002 5.050 M1 100.000 5,996,400.00 1.97 63850JD26 5.8501 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/90 M- 6,000,000.00 1.56 461,B47.45 FBLMC NULTICL RTC P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.937 99.375 461,197.97 .15 3133T02D5 5.9004 06/15/2017 458,960.90 .12 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTV ASSN HER 5.9B1 5.902 AAA 90.609 14,955,300.00 4.86 31364G2V0 5.9201 07/19/2001 DD 07/19/99 HAS 14,791,350.00 3.84 2,500,000.00 MMILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.453 BAY 99.704 2,526,725.00 .B1 59018SEP4 6.3751 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 M- 2,469,600.00 .64 7,500,000.00 BELLSOOTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 6.152 M2 97.523 7,497,255.00 2.40 079867AA5 6.000% 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 MA 7,314,225.00 1.90 12,500,000.00 FEDERAL BONS LN AM COUP DEAN 6.062 6.064 AAA 90.940 12,485,625.00 4.06 3134A32M1 6.000% 07/20/2001 DO 07/20/99 MA 12,367,500.00 3.21 2,000,000.00 HANUMOSTON COUP SR HTS 6.133 6.269 A2 97.698 1,999,600.00 .64 06605TM6 6.125% 03/15/2002 DD 03/12/99 A 1,953,960.00 .51 45,021.06 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 6.200 6.212 AM 99.e12 45,021.05 .01 316778M4 6.2001 09/01/2001 AD 03/15/96 44,936.42 .01 1,000,000.00 POPULAR INC NTH 4TR 00004 6.201 6.285 A3 98.646 1,000,000.00 .32 73317PADI 6.2001 04/30/2001 DO 04/21/99 BBB+ 996,460.00 .26 2,470,135.75 FRIAR! NULTICLAM CTP 2146 QT 6.207 6.170 AM 97.250 2,434,301.17 .79 3133TMO3 6.0001 11/15/2011 MA 2,409,987.02 .63 377,576.09 OMEN TIRE CORE 99-D Cl, A-1 6.290 6.309 AAA 99.718 377,576.09 .12 3935052Y7 6.290% 10/15/2013 DO 08/26/19 AM 376,511.33 .10 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSFO7522202 2000/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/00 DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 13.20.16 .........................................v...................................®.............................................. PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MONET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MOORE VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ASSN MTN 6.212 6.316 AAA 18.641 4,460,705.00 1.45 3I364CNV5 6.230E 03/01/2002 US 03/03/97 AAA 4,438r B45.00 1.15 3,065,542.18 FNLMC MULTICLABB CTF B3 A 6.316 6.355 AAA 95.960 3,060,094.87 .96 3133MR95 VAR AT OB/15/2032 AM 2,941,694.28 .76 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.899 A2 97.845 2,031,960.00 .64 073102MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 11956,900.00 .51 6o25O,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR OHM 8F MTO 6.492 6.557 AAA 91.500 5,662,109.38 1.08 01HO60643 6.000% 04/15/2029 ARA 5,716,750.00 1.4E 2,000,000.00 FBLNC MULTICDABS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.81B AAA 95.336 2,000,888.00 .62 3133TDPV2 6.500E 09/25/2018 AAA 1,906,720.00 .49 11,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMN 11 ARNS 6.501 6.559 AAA, 99.094 11,137,109.38 3.65 1600626SI 6.500E 05/20/2030 AAA 11,148,075.00 2.89 2r410,496.00 POW NULTICLASS CTF 86R 1620E 6.526 7.059 AAA 84.99E 2,254,346.06 .67 3133TI744 6.000E 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 3,040,862.72 .53 23,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTBB 6.621 6.446 AAA 100.944 22r050,859.38 7.62 912827262 06.500E 10/15/2006 DO 10/15/96 AAA 23,194,120.00 6.02 0,681,791.64 FEW GROUP IGS-0476 6.62E 7.060 AAA 99.154 9,917,444.62 2.83 312ODDOSS 7.000E 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/90 AAA 8,608,343.68 2.23 21r500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA BP HER 6.673 6.892 AAR 94.312 20,015,156.25 6.66 OINC62649 6.500E 04/15/2030 AAA 20,277,080.00 5.26 2,977,123.27 OHM 11 POOL 40808BBN 6.705 6.327 AAA 100.766 2,020,372.84 .65 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 1,992,260.03 .52 10,500,000.00 FEDERAL BONG LN MTN COMP DEAN 6.721 6.532 ARA 96.453 I0,323r075.00 3.33 3134AITCO 6.300E 06/01/2004 DO 06/01/91 AAA 10,127,565.00 2.63 2,000,000.00 MEAN 6 NCLBNNAM COB INC SR NT 6.717 6.841 A2 96.041 1,992,280.00 .63 571746AB8 6.625E 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 RA- 1,936,820.00 .50 3,000,000.00 FORD MIR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.894 Al 97.109 2,99S,080.00 .95 345397Bi3 6.700% 07/16/2004 US 07/16/19 _ A. 2,915,670.00 .76 900,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LN AN CONS BUD 6.777 6.772 AAA 99.672 899,550.00 .29 3133MAOJ1 6.7501 02/01/2002 US 02/01/00 AAA 897,048.00 .23 UNREAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 8 0CBF03522202 2000/03/31 RUN DATE 1 04/06/00 DISTRICT* LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 1 13.20.16 vvvvvvv=ee=ennun=nuu=nee..... vnnn=mn=v==mvucunn....nmucvuu==an=uuvunuum.....=c=unn=vun=nnm®......==nn=un........... PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE A TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE NONE US INC NT 6.066 J.OBO A3 96.15E 2,498,400.00 .39 22237UASB 6.8501 09/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,418,950.00 .63 1,483,979.50 GNNA I1,POOL 10080023 6.992 3.059 AAA 100.938 1,508,557.92 .49 36225CAE9 7.125% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 1,497,899.23 .39 2,000,000.00 GEM GTD REM1C TR 2000-2 PA 7.014 3.047 AAA 99.328 1,996,075.00 .65 3B33N3C30 3.000E 12/20/2022 AAA 1.986.560.00 .52 2,100,000.00 FIVERAL NAIL BIG ASSN DESS 3.113 6.989 AAA 96.132 2,030,133.00 .66 31359MYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 GO 01/01/99 BAR 2,019,612.00 .52 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO OUR OEM SP NIC 3.298 3.910 AM 101.141 2r003r1B7.50 .66 0INOD0641 8.000E 04/15/2030 AAA 2,022,620.00 .52 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.437 AM3 91.191 2,151,250.00 .63 542631CT3 0.200E 03/15/2023 DO 03/28/93 A- 1,943,820.00 .50 1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNO CORP FAA 095-7 7.564 7.540 AAA 98.539 1,302,163.94 .42 399101AC4 3.430E 06/el/2003 DD 02/29/00 AM 1,302,163.94 .34 1,000,000.00 FORD ROTOR CR CO HT 7.580 6.968 Al 96.869 965,170.00 .31 3453930V9 6.750% 05/15/2005 AI 960,660.00 .25 975.35S.59 NMP/NUNTODN PAIGE 4000-11150 2.684 7.667 AAA 93.828 954,563.39 .31 302998093 3.SDUB 12/01/2030 DD 10121/99 AM 954.563.39 .25 0,600,000.00 U B TREASURY BONDS 7.966 B.81/ AAA 141.703 13,314,211.20 4.43 912010DL9 12.5004 O8/15/2014 ON O9115184 AAA 13,603,408.00 3.53 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.951 5.905 306,516,162.31 100.00 304,130,949.34 09.91 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.O87 5.551 307,915,015.67 100.00 385,S301302.70 100.00 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 01-Mar-2000 -3.40 99366Y204 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 0.00 CW 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-Mar-2000 -1.70 99366YS32 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 03-Mar-2000 -1.70 99367AO80 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 03-Mar-2000 Oleo LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR FEB 06-Mar-2000 -20.40 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 06-Ma 2000 -1.70 99367BI79 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 06-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES FOR FEB 06-MU-2000 -11.05 NA9123459 0.00 CW 06-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Aprv2000 15:57'14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 07-Mar-2000 -1.70 99367C219 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 0.00 CW 07-Mar-2000 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-My-2000 -3,766,940.00 313384VZ9 MAT 0424/2000 01-Mar-2000 3,766,940.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Mar-2000 -3,766,940.00 313384VZ9 MAT 04/242000 01-Mar-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Mar-2000 -31,500,000.00 99366Y832 05.570-/.03/022000 DO 03101/ 01-Mar-2000 31,500,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Mar-2000 -31,500,000.00 99366Y832 05.570%0310 2 2 0 0 0 DO 031011 01-Mur-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 77,058.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Mar-2000 -77,058.20 996095247 02-Mar-2000 77,059.20 B 0.00 07-Apr4000 15:57:14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAUS/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 77,058.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Ma 2000 -77,058.20 996085247 02-My-2000 0.00 PC 02-MU-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Mar-2000 -2,499,617.36 313588TV7 MAT 03103/20DO 02-MU-2000 2,499,617.36 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 02-Ma-2000 -2,499,617.36 313588TV7 MAT 03/032000 02-MU-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-MU-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Mar-2000 -28,600,000.00 99367AOBO 05.600%03/032000 DO 03/02/ 02-MM-2000 28,60000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28 00,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-MU-2000 -28,600,000.00 99367AOSO 05.600%03/032000 DO 03/02/ 02-Me 2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 02-MU-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,404,336.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MW-2000 -1,404,336.09 9%085247 03-Mar-2000 1,404,336.08 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,404,336.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-MBo-2000 -1,404,336.08 996085247 03-MU-2000 0.00 PC 03-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Ayr-2000 15:57.14 Etemi"Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00GO0010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Mu-2000 .2,498,825.00 313589TYI MAT 03/06/2000 03-Mu-2000 2,498,825.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Mu-2000 -2,499,825.00 313588TY1 MAT 03/06/2000 03-Mu-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Mu-2000 -17,300,000.00 99367B179 05.650%03/06/2000 DO 03/03/ 03-Mu-2000 17,300,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Mu-2000 -17,300,000.00 99367B179 05.650%03/06/2000 DD 03/031 03-Mu-2000 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 03-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Mu-2000 -9,900.111.11 313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 03-Mar-2000 9,900,111.11 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Mu-2000 -9,900,111.11 313588WK7 MATURES 05/04/2000 03-Mu-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 03-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Mu-2000 -17,400,000.00 99367C219 05.630°/.03/07/2000 DD 031061 06-Mar-2000 17,400,000.00 B LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Ap,2000 15:57:14 Fx mlive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: S PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Mar-2000 -17,400,000.00 99367C219 05.630%03/07/2000 DD 03/06/ 06-Mar-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 06.Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP L P DISC 06-Mar-2000 -889,298.25 38142TEQ4 05242000 06-My-2000 989.28925 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP L P DISC 06-My-2000 -988,289.25 38142TEQ4 05242000 06-My-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 06-My-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 06-Mar-2000 -2,499,613.19 31358MB MATURES 03/072000 06-Mar.2000 2,499,613.19 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 06-Mar-2000 -2,499,613.19 313588TZ8 MATURES 03/072000 06-Mar-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 67,631.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Mar-2000 -67,631.69 9%085247 07-Mm-2000 67,631.69 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 67,631.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Mar-2000 -67,631.69 996085247 07-Mu-2000 0.00 FC 07-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Ap-2000 15:57:14 Eimuuw Wwkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIKWSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Mar-2000 -2,077,894.58 313588WSO MAT 05/112000 07-Mer-2000 2,077,894.58 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Mar-20D0 -2,077,894.58 313599WSO MAT 05/112000 07-Ma 2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,20000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2000 -18,035,087.78 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 07-Mar-2000 18,035,097.78 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2000 -18.035,087.78 313396WH2 MATURES 03/072000 07-Mar-2000 0.0D FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,700,0D0.00 EASTMAN KODAK CO DISC 08-Mar-2000 .2,668,209.75 27746AE14 05/19/2000 08-MBr-2000 2,668,209.75 B MORGAN 3 P SECS-FIXED NCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 EASTMAN KODAK CO DISC 08-Mar-2000 -2,668,209.75 27746AEI4 05/192000 08-MU-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN 1 P SECS-FIXED NCO 08-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 51,379.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Mu-20W -51,379.68 996095247 10-Mar-20D0 51,379.68 B 0.00 07-Apr 2000 15:57.14 Eeemfive Wa kbene6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 XEROX CR CORP DISC 15-Mar-2000 -1,299,786.% 98412MCGO 03/16/2000 15-Mar-2000 1,299,786.94 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 XEROX CR CORP DISC 15-Mar-2000 -1,299,786.94 98412MCGO 03/16/2000 15-Mar-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 79,0%.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Mar-2000 -79,096.99 9%085247 16-Mar-2000 79,096.99 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 79,096.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Mar-2000 .79,096.99 996085247 16-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 16-Mm-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61,658.46 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 16-Mar-2000 -61,658.46 996087094 16-Mar-2000 61,658.46 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,300,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Mar-2000 -5,249,482.17 02225AEC2 05/12/2000 16-Ma 2000 5,249,482.17 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,300,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 16-Mar-2000 -5,249,492.17 02225AEC2 05/12/2000 16-Mar-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 16-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGo0010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,579.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Met-2000 4,579.58 996095247 20-Mu-2000 4,579.58 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,579.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Mt 2000 4,579.58 996095247 20-My-2000 0.00 PC 20-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO $3,352.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Mu-2000 -93,352.16 996085247 20-Met-2000 83,352.16 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 83,352.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Mw-2000 -93,352.16 996085247 20-Mm-2000 0.00 PC 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 21-Mot-2000 -4,656,701.25 90328AEF6 05/15/2000 21-Mar-2000 4,656,701.25 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,700,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 21-My-2000 4,656,701.25 90328AEF6 05/15/2000 21-Mu-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 22-Mtu-2000 -394,334.67 61166AFE4 06/14/2000 22-My-2000 394,334.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-APn2000 15:57:14 Executive Wwkbewty Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. u PORTFOLIO DETAIL OGsGppOlpppp 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 MONSANTO CO DISC 22-Mer-2000 -394,334.67 61166AFE4 06/14/2000 22-Ma 2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Mar.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,103.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Mar-2000 -56,103.33 996085247 23-Mar-2000 56,103.33 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,103.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Mar-2000 -56,103.33 996085247 23-Ma-2000 0.00 FC 23-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,115.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mer-2000 -65,115.56 996095247 24-Mar-2000 65,115.56 B 0.0D LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,115.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mer-2000 -65,115.56 996095247 24-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 24-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 77,785.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Mar-2000 -77,785.94 996085247 27-Mar-2000 77,785.94 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 77,785.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Mar-2000 -77,785.94 996095247 27-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 27-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15.:57.14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE' 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATEO SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,664.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Mu-2000 -6,664.69 996095247 29-Mu-200D 6,664.69 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,664.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Mu-2000 -6,664.69 996085247 29-Mu-20DO 0.00 FC 29-Mu-20DO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 722,595.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Mu-2000 -722,585.09 996085247 31-Mu-2000 724583.09 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 722.595.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Mu-2000 722,585.09 996085247 31-Mu-2000 0.00 FC 31-Mu-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 -9,699,375.00 OIN062631 6.500%03/15/2029 22-Mu-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 02-Feb-2000 -10,161,250.00 OIN062631 6.300%03/15/2029 22-Mu-2000 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 22-Mu-2000 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Feb-2000 -5,593,750.00 OIN060635 6.000%03/15/2029 22-Mu-2000 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Mu-2000 0.00 07-Ap,2000 15:S7:14 Ese"tM Wmkb.k Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 15-Feb-2000 -1,302,163.94 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/29/0 03-Mu-2000 1,302,163.94 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 15-Feb-2000 -545A7 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02/2910 03-Mu-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,321,469.79 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 15-Feb-2000 .1,302,709.41 398104AE4 7.430^/606/OU2003 DO 0229/0 03-Ma 2000 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 03-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-Feb-2000 -25,450,595.55 912827Z62 06.500%10/152006 DO 10/151 01-Mu-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 01-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 29-F6-2000 -3,034,478.13 209111CU5 FLTG RT 06/152002 DO 0620/ 02-Mu-2000 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-Mu-2000 -3,483,457.03 9128274Q2 05.125%08/31/2000 DO 081311 02-Mu-2000 3,483,457.03 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-Mu-2000 -974.86 9128274Q2 05.125%08/312000 DO 08131/ 02-Mu-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Apr-1000 15:57.14 &x mfiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE, 14 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-Mm-2000 -3,484,431-99 9128274Q2 05.125%0012000 DO 08/31/ 02-Mar-2000 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 02-MU-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 8TR 00006 02-Mer-2000 495,945.00 90269QAF6 6.170%03/062001 DO 03/069 07-Mar-2000 495,845.00 B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 8TR 00OD6 02-Mar-2000 -9,597.78 90269QAF6 6.170%03/0620DI DO 03/069 07-My-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 UGI UTILS INC MTN 8TR DD006 02-Mar-2000 -505,442.78 90269QAF6 6.170%03/062001 DO 03/06/9 07-Mer-2000 0.00 FC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 07-Mor-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,955,918.71 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98.2 AI O&Mu-2000 -2,949.782.94 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 10-MW-2000 2,949,792.94 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,855,918.71 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 08-M4r-2000 -22,499.55 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 10-My-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,855,918.71 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 08-Mar-2000 -2,872,281.49 784420BA3 FLTG RT 04252007 DO 06/18/ 10-MU-20DO 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 10-My-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15.57.14 Fseeullm Work6eueh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1B PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATEr AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 09-Mar-2000 -3,000,000.00 345397SR5 FLTG RT 03/172003 DO 031161 16-Mu-2000 3,000,000.00 B MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED[NCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 09-Mer-2000 -3,000,000.00 345397SR5 FLTG RT 03/172003 DO 03/16/ 16-Mar-2000 0.00 PC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 16-Mu-200D 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP#TR 00562 09-Mar-2000 -2,996,430.00 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02IM003 DO 07J14/ 14-Mar-2000 2,996,430.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL WES ACCEP#TR 00562 09-Mu-2000 -15,125.31 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/142003 DD 02/14/ 14-Mu-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP#TR 00562 09-Mu-2000 -3,011,555.31 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02I412003 DO 02114/ 14-Mar-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 14-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Mu-2000 -10,240,312.50 OIN062649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 10,240,312.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 13-Mu-2000 -9,774.943.75 OIN062649 6.500%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 9,774,943.75 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:l4 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,262,590.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Mu-2000 -1,256,316.42 9128273AB 3.625%0 711 5 2 0 02 DD 07/151 17-Mu-2000 L256,316.42 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,262,580.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Mu-2000 .7,795.74 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DD 07/151 17-Mu-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,262,580.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Mar-2000 -1,264,112.16 9128273AS 3.625%0711 5/2 0 02 DO 07/15/ 17-Mu-2000 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 17-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA 11 ARMS 15-Mu-2000 -9,998,437.50 16HO62651 6.500%05202030 24-May-2000 9,899,437.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA II ARMS 15-Mu-2000 -1,238,671.88 16HO62651 6.500%05202030 24-May-2000 1,238,671.88 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Mu-2000 -5,662,109.38 OIN060643 6.000%04/152029 19-Apr-2000 5,662,109.38 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 21-Mu-2000 -2,952,187.50 OIN072655 7.500%05/152029 22-May-2000 2,952,187.50 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 &ecut,.Wo kberch Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Mee-2000 -Z030,133.00 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DO 09/01/9 22-Mu-2000 Z030,133.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DEBS 22-Mu-2000 -2,705.21 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DO 09101/9 22-Mar-2000 0.00 111 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 22-Mu-2000 -Z032,838.21 31359MEYS 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/0119 22-My-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Mee-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,512,400.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 22-Mar-2000 -8,142,642.63 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 01/1 S/ 23-Mee-2000 8,142,642.63 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,512,400.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 22-MU-2000 -53,670.21 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01115/ 23-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,512,400.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 22-Mu-2000 -8,196,312.84 9128272M3 3.375%011152007 DO 011151 23-Mu-2000 0.00 PC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 23-Mm-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 23-My-2000 -2,32Z379.00 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DD 0329/ 23-Mm-2000 Z32Z379.00 B PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Ap,2000 15:57:14 E=.th.Wo kbe¢h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: IS PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 003 23-Mu-2000 -35,285.83 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DO 03/29/ 23-Mu-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MT 4 TR 003 23-Mar-2000 -2,357,664.83 52517PPW5 FLTG RT 04/012002 DO 032W 23-Mu-2000 0.00 FC PRUDENTIAL SEC INC,NEW YORK 23-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 29-Mu-2000 -599,760.00 912404AEI 6.500%0 611 520 0 0 DO 06/1319 03-Apr-2000 599,760.00 B ADVEST CO,HART-FORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP NT 29-Mar-2000 -11,700.00 812404AE1 6.500%06/152000 DO 0611319 03-Apr-2000 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-Mu-2000 -2,007,187.50 OIN080641 8.000%04/152030 19-Apr-2000 2,007,187.50 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 31-Mar-2000 -965,170.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 05-Apr.2000 %5,170.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 31-Mar-2000 -26,250.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 05-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 PAY UPS 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 &wulAn Wwkbeaeh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,790.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 .29,780.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-J=.2000 29,790.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,780.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.Jam2000 -29,780.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/ 15-fen-2000 0.00 FC 31-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -2,300.00 9128275WS 4.250%001/152010 DD 01/151 15-1.-2000 2,300.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -2,300.00 9128275WS 4.250%001/152010 DO 011151 15-1an-2000 0.00 FC 31-Mer-2000 &00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,296.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 -18,2%.00 9128273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/15/ 15-Jan-2000 - 19,296.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,296.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2000 .18,296.00 9128273A8 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 15-Jan-2000 0.00 FC 31-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 -47.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-Mar-2000 47.00 PU 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY U3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Mu-2000 47.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/15/2032 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11.992.36 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Ma 2000 -11,992.36 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Mar-2000 11,992.36 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,992.36 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Mar-2000 -11,99136 3133T17A4 6.0009/.11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 16-My-2000 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -297,535.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Mar-2000 297,535.48 996085247 - 01-Mar-2000 -297,335.49 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,297,535.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Mar-2000 297,535.48 996095247 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 01-Mar-2000 56,500,000.00 99366YZ04 05.600%03/012000 DO 0229/ 01-Mar-2000 -56,500,000.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:10 Executive BTorkherrh-, Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1l PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOUDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 01-Mer-2000 8,788.89 99366Y204 05.600%03/01/2000 DD 02/29/ 01-My-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56,500,00D.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 01-Mar-2000 56,509,799.99 99366Y204 05.600%03/012000 DD 0229/ 01-Mu-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 01-Mm-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Mer-2000 31,500,000.00 99366YB32 05.570%03/022000 DD 03/01/ 02-Mee-2000 -31,500,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Mar-2000 4,873.75 99366Y832 05.570%03/02/2000 DD 03/01/ 02-Mer-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Mar-2000 31,504,873.75 99366Y832 05.570%03/022000 DD 03/01/ 02-My-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 02-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Ma 2000 28,600,000.00 99367AO90 05.600%03/032000 DO 03/02/ 03-Mm2000 -28,600,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Mtu-2000 4,448.89 99367AOBO 05.600%03/03/2000 DD 031021 03-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 Executive Wo kbeueh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Mu-2000 28,604,448.99 99367AOBO 05.600%03/03/2000 DO 03/02/ 03-Mu-2000 0.00 PC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 03-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,394,586.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Mu-2000 1,394,586.09 996085247 06-Mu-2000 -1,394,586.09 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,394,586.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Mu-2000 1,394,586.D9 996085247 06-Mu-2000 O.OD FC 06-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Mar-2000 17,300,000.00 99367BI79 05.650%03/06/2000 DO 03/03/ 06-Mu-2000 -17,300,000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Mu-2000 9,145.42 993678179 05.650%03/06/2000 DO 03/03/ 06-Mu-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO D6-Mu-2000 17,308,145.42 993678179 05.650%03/062000 DO 03/03/ 06-Mu-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 06-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Mar-2000 17,400,000.00 99367C219 05.630%03/072000 DO 031061 07-Mu-2000 -17,400.000.00 S LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15.57:14 Emend.W.,Oewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGi 23 PORTFOLIO DETAEL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OGSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIKILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .17,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Mar-2000 2,721A7 99367C219 05.630%03M7/2000 DO 03/ON 07-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Mar-2000 17,402,721.17 99367C219 05.630%03/07/2000 DO 031061 07-Mar-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN BROS INC,NEW YORK 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,209.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Mar-2000 68,209.75 996085247 08-Mar-2000 69,209.75 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -K209.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Mar.2000 68,209.75 996095247 08-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 08-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 10-Mu-2000 3,969,290.00 313396UP6 MAT 03/212000 10-Mar.2000 -3,969,280.00 S HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 10-Mar-2000 23,802.22 313396UP6 MAT 03212000 10-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 10-Mar-2000 3,993,082.22 313396UP6 MAT 03212000 10-Ma-2000 0.00 FC HSBC SECS INC,NEW YORK 13-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Aprv2000 15:57:14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,209,234.55 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Mar-2000 1,209,234.55 996085247 13-Mar-2000 -1,209,234.55 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,209,234.55 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Mer-2000 1,209,23C55 996085247 13-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 13-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,197.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Mar-2000 3,197.31 996085247 14-Mar-2000 -3,197.31 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,197.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Mar-2000 3,197.31 996095247 14-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 14-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .17,948.76 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT I6-Ma-2000 17,948.76 9%087094 16-Mar-2000 -17,949.76 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,658.46 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Mar-2000 61,658A6 996087094 17-Mer-2000 -61,658.46 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -653,351.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mar-2000 653,351.81 996085247 17-Mar-2000 -633,351.81 S 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 Eveculive Wprkbeneh,. Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -653,351.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mar-2000 653,351.81 996085247 17-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 17-Mar-2000 496,160.00 313396UP6 MAT 0321/200D 17-Me-2000 -496,160.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS WC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 17-Mar-2000 3,528.89 313396UP6 MAT 03/212000 17-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 17-Mu-2000 499,698.89 313396UP6 MAT 03212000 17-MU-2000 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS MG NY 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,034.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Mar-2000 45,034.58 996085247 21-MW-2000 45.034.58 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,034.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Mar-2000 45,034.58 996085247 21-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 21-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,192.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Mar-2000 152,182.22 996085247 22-Mar-2000 -152,192.22 S 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 E..t, a Warkbe.eh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY HI TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,182.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-MU-2000 152,182.22 996085247 22-Mm-2000 0.00 FC 22-Ma-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 23-Mar-2000 8,214,429.31 313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 23-MW-2000 -8,214,429.31 S MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED MCO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 23-Mu-2000 47,353.80 313588VV4 MAT 04202000 23-MU-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 23-Mm-2000 9,261,783.11 313588VV4 MAT 04/20/2000 23-Mu-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN I P SECS-FIXED INCO 23-Mu-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Mu-2000 9,793,457.03 OIN062631 6.500%03/152030 22-MU-2000 9,699,375.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 84,092.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Mw-2000 9,783,457.03 OIND62631 6.500%03/15/2030 22-Mm-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Mm-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,W0.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 13-Me 2000 10,249,335.94 OIN062631 6.500%03/152030 22-Mar-2000 -10,161,250.00 S BEAR STEARNS 8:CO INC,NY 88,085.94 07-Apr 2000 15:57.14 &emlim Wwkben<6. Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGi 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 1 SF MTG 13-Mar-2000 10,249,335.94 OIN062631 6.500%03/15/2030 22-Mar-2000 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-M"-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -974,577-64 FNMA POOLA0252703 15-Mm-2000 944,426.65 31371HU49 6.500%09/01/2006DD08PoI/ 23-Mar-2000 -954,324.69 S BEAR STEARNS&CO WC,NY -9,898.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -974,577.64 FNMA POOL80252703 15-Mar-2000 3,971.24 31371HU48 6.500%09/012006 DO 08/01/ 23-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -974,577.64 FNMA POOL 00252703 15-Mar-2000 949,297.99 31371HU48 6.500%09/012006 DO 08/01/ 23-Mar-2000 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 23-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Mar-2000 6,943,375.00 9128274V I 04.750%11/152009 DO 111151 16-Mar-2000 -6,761,244.70 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 92,130.30 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,700,000.00 USTREASURYNOTES 15-Mm-2000 122,596.54 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 11115/ 16-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Mar-2000 6,965,961.54 9128274V I 04.750%11/152008 DD 111151 16-Mar-2000 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 17-Mm-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 &,mt1w Wo kbera6 Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000loo00 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSDCONSOLIDATEO SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I6-Mm-2000 5,665,771.48 OIN060635 6.000%03/15/2029 22-Mar.2000 -5,593.750.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 72,021 AS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Mu-2000 5,665,771.48 OING60635 6.000-A 03/15/2029 22-Mar-2000 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DEBS 21-My-2000 2,029,096.00 31359MEY5 6.625%09/15/2009 DD 09/0" 22-Mar-2000 -2,009,440.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19,656.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 21-Mar-2000 Z705.21 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DO 09/0119 22-Mar-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEBS 21-Mar-20D0 2,030,901.21 31359MEYS 6.625%09/152009 DO 09/01/9 22-Ma-2000 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 22-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG 22-Mar-2000 2,953,593.75 OIN072655 7.500%05/15/2029 22-May-2000 -Z952,187.50 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 1,40625 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MW-2000 2,014,843.74 912827Z62 06.500%10/152006 DD 10/151 03-Apr-2000 -1,997,031.25 S GREEN WICH CAP MKTS INC,GREE 27,812.49 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 Erccullm Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Mar-2000 60,737.70 912827Z62 06.500%10/152006 DO 101151 03-Apr-2000 0.00 IS 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 46,853.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 46,853.50 3133TCE95 6.324%08/152032 01-Feb-2000 46,904.74 PDC 51.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -559.90 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE 0000.11150 01-Feb-2000 558.80 302998GE3 7.500%121012030 DD 1021/9 01-Feb-2000 0.00 FC 02-Me 2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,900.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CFF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 46,900.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-Feb-2000 46,951.79 PD -51.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,900.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 01-Feb-2000 46,900.50 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-1`eb-2000 0.00 PC 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -216,743.73 PHLMC GROUP#05-0476 01-Mar-2000 21C743.73 3128DDQ55 7.000%021012003 DO 02/011 01.Mar-2000 -220,130.35 PI) -3,386.62 07-Aprv2000 15:57:14 Frecutive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGoo010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,216,743.73 FHLMC GROUP#G5.0476 01-Mu-2000 216,743.73 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 02/011 01-Mar-2000 0.00 PC 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,736.00 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Mar-2000 32,736.00 3133T02D5 5.900%06/152017 01-Mar-2000 -32,689.96 PD 46.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,736.00 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 01-Mar-2000 32,736.00 3133T02D5 5.900%06/15/2017 01-Mar-2000 0.00 PC 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,864.25 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Mar-2000 21,864.25 3133TKKU3 6.000%11/15/2011 01-Mar-2000 .21,478.21 PD 396.04 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,864.25 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 01-Mar-2000 21,864.25 3133TKKU3 6.000% 11/15/2011 01-Mar-2000 0.00 PC 15-My-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,069.45 FNMA POOL#0252703 01-Mar-2000 1,069.45 31371HU48 6.500"/a09/01/2006 DO 08/01/ 01-Mar-2000 -1,047.23 PD 22.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,069.45 FNMA POOL 80252703 01-Mar-2000 1,069.45 31371HU48 6.500a/09/01/2006 DO 08/01/ 01-Mar-2000 0.00 PC 27-Mar-2000 0.00 07.Aprv2000 15:57.14 Eremdw Workbench. Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000i0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCREPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAPULOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,007.65 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Mar-2000 31,007.65 36225CC20 VAR RT 0620/2027 DO 06100 01-Mar-2000 -31,685.94 PD -67819 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.007.65 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Mar-2000 31,007.65 36225CC20 VAR RT 06/202027 DD 06/01/9 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,671.20 GNMAU POOL#0080023 01-Mar-2000 3Z67L20 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/202026 DO 12/01/ 01-Mar-2000 -33,212.32 PD -541.12 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO .32,671.20 GNMA II POOL 40080023 01-Mar-2000 3Z671.20 36225CAZ9 7.125%12/202026 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,748.75 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Me-2000 5,748.75 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Mar-2000 -5,608.62 PD 140.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -562.70 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE#000-11150 01-Mar-2000 562.70 302998GE3 7.500%1 210 12 03 0 DD 102119 01-Mar-2000 -550.48 PD 12.22 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -562.70 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE 9000-11150 01-Mar-2000 562.70 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 29-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Ap-1000 15.57:14 Er.ttw Wmkb..h Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROILER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,976.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-Mar-2000 43,976.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 01-Mar-2000 44,024.60 PD 48.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,604.76 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Mar-2000 7,604.76 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DD 03/1519 15-Mar-2000 -7,604.76 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .7,604.76 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Mar-2000 7,604.76 31677EAA4 6.200%091012001 DD 03115/9 15-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 15-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -27,601.52 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Mar-2000 27,601.52 3935052Y7 6.290%10/15/2013 DD 08/26/9 15-My-2000 -27,601.52 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,601.52 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL A-1 15-Mer-2000 27,601.52 3935052Y7 6.290%1 011 5/2 0 1 3 DD 08/26/9 15-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 15-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,911.79 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Mar-2000 46,911.79 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Ma-2000 46,911.79 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,911.79 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Mar4000 46,911.79 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Mar-2000 0.00 FC 16-Mar-2000 0.00 MATURITIES 07-Apr-2000 /5:57:I4 Execullve H*kbewh„ Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Ma-2000 3,799,396.22 313384TT6 MAT 03/01/2000 01-Mu-2000 .3,799,396.22 MT 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Ma-2000 2,489,916.67 313588TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 02-Mu-2000 -2,48%916.67 MT 02-Mw-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 02-Mar-2000 3,411,181.67 912795DK4 03/0212000 DO 03/04199 02-Mar-2000 -3,411,181.67 MT 02-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Mu-2000 199,528.33 31358STU9 MAT 03/02/2000 02-Mu-2000 -199,528.33 MT 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-MU-2000 2,499,617.36 313588TV7 MAT 03/03/2000 03-MU-2000 -2,499,617.36 MT 03-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Me-2000 2,498,825.00 31358MI MAT 03/062000 06-Mu-2000 -2,498,825.00 MT 06-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 06-Mu-2000 895,336.00 341 IOAC68 03/062000 06-Mar4000 -895,336.00 MT 06-Mu-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 Exsculive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCBD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Mer-2000 2,499,613.19 313588TZ8 MATURES 03/072000 07-Mer-2000 -2,499,613.19 MT 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2000 696,923.89 313396TZ6 MAT 03/072000 0744er-2000 -6%,923.89 MT 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 08-Mar-2000 2,585,831.44 34539TC86 03/082000 0&Mar-2000 -2,585,831.44 MT 08-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 14-Mar-2000 3,589,632.00 02225ACEO 03/142000 14-Mar-2000 -3,539,632.00 MT 14-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC IS-Mer-2000 1,299,582.56 2546ROCF5 03/152000 15-Me 2000 -1,299,582.56 MT 15-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 XEROX CR CORP DISC 16-Mer-2000 1,299,786.94 98412MCGO 03/162000 16-Mar-2000 -1,299,786.94 MT 16-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,00D.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTO CORP DI 21-Mer-2000 595,392.00 313396UP6 MAT 03212000 21-Mer-2000 -595,392.00 MT 21-Mm-2000 0.00 07-Apr-1000 15:57:14 Evecarive Wo kbewh-. Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010M 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Mar-2000 3,973,650.17 44922ACMO 03/21/2000 21-Mar-2000 -3,973,650.17 MT 21-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Mar-2000 1,393,526.56 13443ACP8 03232000 23-Mar-2000 .1,393,526.56 MT 23-Mar-2000 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 15-Mar-2000 500,000.00 460146A32 9.700%03/152000 DO 0321/9 15-Mar-2000 -506,445.00 MT 15-Mar-2000 -6,445.00 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSOT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Mar-2000 0.10 996087094 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Mm-2000 0.02 996087094 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 01-Mar-2000 140,175.00 31364CXVS 6.230%03/012002 DO 03103/9 01-Mm-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15.57.14 Encvriv Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Mu-2000 919.95 996085247 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Mu-2000 4,099.48 996085247 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Mu-2000 603.78 313384TT6 MAT 03/012000 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 01-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Mu-2000 11,083.33 313588TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 02-Mu-2000 0.00 1T 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Ma 2000 471.67 313588TU9 MAT 03/02/2000 02-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILLS 02-Mu-2000 89,818.33 912795DK4 03/022000 DO 03/04/99 02-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 02-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 559.80 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 02-Mu-2000 6,105.48 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 10/2119 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 02-Mu-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 &ecurlve Workbench, Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 03-Mm-2000 382.64 313588TY7 MAT 03/032000 03-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 03-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Mar-2000 1,175.00 31358MI MAT 03/062000 06-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 06-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900.000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 06-Mar-2000 4,664.00 341 IOAC68 03/062000 06-MU-2000 0.00 IT 06-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATI.MTG ASSN DISC N 07-Mar-2000 386.81 313588TZ8 MATURES 03/072000 07-Mm-2000 0.00 IT 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2000 3,076.11 313396T7.6 MAT03/072000 07-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 07-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 08-Mar-2000 14,168.56 34539TO86 03/082000 08-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 08-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 10-Mar-2000 5%.39 313384TSS MAT 02292000 29-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 10-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apr.2000 15:57:14 E[e"dw Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOWI0000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARFATAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 13-Mar-2000 89,910.25 52517PQQ7 FLTG RT 12/122002 DO 12/071 13-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 13-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 ALUMINUM CO AMER DISC 14-Mar-2000 10,368.00 02225ACEO 03/142000 14-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 14-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO NT 15-Mu-2000 24,250.00 460146AI2 9.700g 03/152000 DD 032119 15-MU-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DIES 15-Mar-2000 74,972.91 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DD 0910M 15-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mar.2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 15-Mar-2000 46,874.48 209111CU5 FLTG FIT 06/152002 DD 0620/ 15-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mer-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 15-My-2000 82,000.00 542671CT7 8,200%03/152023 DD 0328/9 15-Mer-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER.PIMCO 1,300,000.00 DISNEY WALT CO DISC I5-Mu-2000 417.44 2546ROCF5 03/152000 15-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mm-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 Executive WwkbeuM Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 216,743.73 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 15-Mu-2000 51,908.12 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02101/ 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,864.25 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF 2146 QT 15-Mu-2000 12,500.00 31337KKU3 6.000%11/152011 01-Mu-20DD 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,736.00 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-Mu-2000 2,431.70 3133T02D5 5.900%061152017 01-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,604.76 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A C 15-Mu-2000 271.90 31677EAA4 6.200%09/012001 DO 03/159 IS-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,900.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mu-20M 15,776.95 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Mu-2000 47.00 3133TCE95 VARRT08/152032 01-Feb-2000 0.00 IT I S-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 27,601.52 GREEN TREE CORP 99-D CL AA 15-Mu-2000 2,123.92 3935052Y7 6.290%10/152013 DO 08269 15-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 15-Mu-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 Ercculim Wwkbewh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGO6010M 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I,OSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKBOSTON CORP SR NTS I5-Mu-2000 61,930.56 06605TAL6 6.125%03/15/2002 DO 03112/9 15-Mu-2000 0.00 IT IS-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 XEROX CR CORP DISC 16-Mu-2000 213.06 98412MCGO 03/162000 16-My-2000 0.00 IT 16-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,992.36 FHLMC MULTICLASS LTF SER 162 16-Mu-2000 11,992.36 3133Tl7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO II101/9 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 16-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,911.79 GNMA GM REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Mu-2000 14,746.67 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 16-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 17-Mm-2000 49,413.00 37042WVR9 FLTG RT 12/17/2001 DO 12/15/ 17-Mer2000 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 20-Mar-2000 4,579.58 3134A3RT5 FLTG RT 05/182000 DD 05/18/ 18-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 20-Ma-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,671.20 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 20-Ma 2000 9,005.11 36225CAZ9 7.125%12202026 DO 121011 01-Mu-2000 0.00 1T 20-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Aprv2000 15:57.14 la cwm Wwkbexh Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY H/ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,007.65 GNMA If POOL R080088M 20-Mer-2000 10,668.20 36225CC20 VAR RT 0620,2027 DO 06/Ol/9 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 8TRO06 20-Ma-2000 16,387.77 17120QE90 FLTG RT 08/082002 DO 041081 20-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-2 PA 21-Mar-2000 11,666.67 3837H3C70 7.000-A 12202022 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 21-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME MTG MTG CORP DI 21-Mu-2000 4,608.00 313396UP6 MAT 03/2120DO 21-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 21-MW-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 4,000,000.00 IBM DISC 21-Mar-2000 26,349.83 44922ACMO 03212000 21-MW-2000 0.00 IT 21-Moe-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 CAMPBELL SOUP CO DISC 23-Mee-2000 6,473.44 13443ACP8 03232000 23-Mer-2000 0.00 IT 23-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN 24-Mu-2000 65,115.56 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06242003 DO 0624/ 24-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 24-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57.14 Executive Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocs000010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 27-Mar-2000 28,750.00 42333HK10 5.750%09252001 DO 0925/9 25-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 27-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF TI I A6 27-Mu-2000 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 25.Feb-2000 0.00 IT 27-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 27-My-2000 31,848,40 423328BK8 FLTG RT 06252001 DD 06251 25-MW-2000 0.00 IT 27-MU-2000 0.00 _ LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 1,069.45 FNMA POOL 90252703 27-Mar2000 5,294.76 31371HU48 6.500°A 09/01IM6 DD 08/011 01-Mar-2000 0.00 IT 27-MW-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 562.70 V"/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 29-My-2000 6,101.99 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-My-2000 0.00 IT 29-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Mar-2000 2,300.00 9128275W8 4.2509M01/152010 DO 011151 0.00 CD 31-Mar-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT AD) 31-Mar-2000 -3,321.16 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-Mar-2000 0.00 CW 31-Mar-2000 0.00 07-Apn2000 15:57:14 Executire Workbench Q ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2000-31-MAR-2000 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,430,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Mu-2000 658,968.75 9128275Q1 05.625%0913012001 DO 09/301 31-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 31-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-Mu-2000 66,937.50 912827Z54 06.375%0913 02 0 01 DO 09/30/ 31-Mu-2000 0.00 IT 31-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Mu-2000 29,780.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 31-Mu-2000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Mu-2000 18,2%.00 9129273AS 3.625%07/152002 DO 07/151 0.00 CD 31-Mu-2000 0.00 07-Apr-2000 15:57:14 aemlO Workbench _ FAHRCOMMUEEE M" ngD T°Bd.ofoir. 4/WOO4/26/00 AGENDA REPORT 1OB11N1inw 10onNin°g r-amoaz9 farm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: RESTRUCTURING OF THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, STATUS REPORT AND FORMATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-06, Authorizing Formation of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation and Authorizing Certain Related Actions. SUMMARY In November 1999, the Board of Directors approved a plan to restructure and modernize the District's existing Certificates of Participation (COP) long-term borrowings. In February, staff reported on the progress made by the financing team to develop and implement a comprehensive COP restructuring and refinancing plan. In March, staff presented an overview of COP financing methods, and provided details about the financial structure and the legal documents associated with the Series 2000 COP refinancing. Staff also discussed the need to form the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation in order to issue the Series 2000 COPS. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The modernization of the District's existing COP program is based on a comprehensive refunding and restructuring strategy to re-align the COP legal documents to reflect the District's consolidated organization structure as a single Sanitation District. �wmnwunyw�yeaaa�e ro.�.aew,ewmmn M�+awusnwoxen iym arc R. vione Pagel Under this approach, the rating agencies would view the District as a single credit structure, and the District's ability to obtain formal "Aa" category ratings is strengthened. In addition, streamlining the legal structure for the District's existing COPS will also facilitate issuance of any future debt. Overall, we estimate that present value cost savings of more than $1.4 million would be generated over the life of the Refunding COPS from a combination of a lower cost liquidity facility and elimination of annual Letter of Credit fees. Additional savings may also be realized on future District debt financings. Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation The Series 2000 Refunding COPS will be issued as Installment Purchase COPs. The COPS will be secured by an Installment Purchase Agreement between the District and the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation, which will be the not-for- profit corporation required for the District to issue the Series 2000 COPS. The OCSD Financing Corporation, will be created and controlled by the District for the sole purpose of facilitating current and future COP financings, and will have no powers unto itself. As illustrated in the chart below, the Financing Corporation is an integral component of the Installment Purchase COP financing structure. O D Financing Corporation ♦ Not-for-Profit Corporation Created and Controlled by OCSD ♦ Required by Installment Purchase COP Financing Method wm�n.nt Pwchue A,..t COP P...& P&I Prymenu The District's Board of Directors will serve as the Board of Directors for the Financing Corporation. The Chair and Vice Chair of the District Board will be the President and Vice President of the Corporation. \NCUWM1My.ChlpsNWinN pxge RepwLLVCO]BUN Appn4 geGob�sn 1 (01lU RwIM: Page 2 As depicted in the above chart, the Series 2000 COPS will be secured by an Installment Purchase Agreement between the District and the Financing Corporation, which assigns the right to receive the installment payments to a bank or a trust company which executes and delivers the COPS to investors. The bank or trust company then delivers the purchase price paid by the investors for the COPS to the District to fund or refund its projects. By contrast, the District's existing COPS were issued by agreements among one or more of the then nine separate County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, with Sanitation District No. 1 serving as agent. Therefore, there was no need for a not-for- profit financing corporation for the existing COPs. Bond Counsel has drafted the attached Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for the Financing Corporation, together with a Board Resolution authorizing formation of the Corporation. General Counsel has reviewed the incorporation documents and approves them as to form. Financina Plan and Bond Documents Progress continues with preparation of the documents and agreements required for issuance of the Series 2000 COPS. The Installment Purchase Agreement, or master indenture, is in final review by the financing team, as is the Official Statement. Drafts of the Certificate Purchase and Remarketing Agreements, which will be executed by the District and the underwriter, are under review. Likewise, a Trust Agreement and a Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement have been drafted in anticipation of selecting a Trustee Bank and a Liquidity Bank next month. RFD's are being finalized for solicitation of competitive quotes from selected banks. Additionally, staff and PaineWebber are nearing completion of the briefing booklets for the rating agency presentations scheduled for April 18 and 19. The visits by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch will include a tour of Plant No. 1. Series 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS The financing team has continued to work on the proposed plan to substitute modernized legal documents with the long-term swap providers and credit enhancement providers for the Series 1992 and 1993 Refunding COPS. Several key financial and legal issues have been analyzed, but require additional review. Work on these issues will continue, but are not expected to impede the scheduled issuance of the Series 2000 Refunding COPs. Reimbursement of Capital Reserve Funds In March, the Committee discussed the possibility of adding a "new money" portion to the proposed Series 2000 Refunding COPS, for the purpose of reimbursing the District for previous capital expenditures funded from the District's reserve funds. ,weo„u.mi`.nenm��`�.p ate.Aw��ema/.w+.n.00awowm.ium� q,,;,, ermse Page 3 The financing team has completed an initial review of applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, the Reimbursement Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, and CIP expenditure records to determine what capital costs are eligible for reimbursement. Under the IRS Code, the absolute outside parameter for determining the period for reimbursement eligibility is that the capital expenditures were paid no more than three years before the issuance of the new COPS. Therefore, if the"new money' COPs are issued in May or June, the maximum recapture period would begin in May/June 1997. Approximately $150 million in reserves were expended for capital projects during this recapture period, and are eligible for reimbursement. Further analysis of a proposal to issue COPS for reimbursement will cover several considerations, including competitive selection of a financing team; rating agency evaluation of the proposed mix of the District's variable vs. fixed rate debt; and the impacts of debt service and coverage ratio requirements on user fees. One alternative for issuance of the COPS in the near-term would be to structure some or all of the $150 million as fixed rate COPS, offered via competitive sale. Another alternative would be to solicit proposals from underwriters to serve as Co-Managers with PaineWebber for the new COPS. Staff will review these and other related issues, and report back to the Committee. Financing Schedule A detailed financing schedule for issuance of the Series 2000 Refunding CON is attached for your Committee's review. The following is a summary of upcoming project milestones: Aoril • FAHR and Board approve formation of OCSD Financing Corporation • Finalize legal documents and POS for Series 2000 COPS • Complete plans for Series 92 and 93 Refunding COPS • Finalize rating agency presentation materials • Conduct rating agency presentations and tours hLay • Receive"Aa" category stand-alone credit rating for District • Select liquidity facility provider • Select trustee bank • FAHR and Board approve legal documents • Mail Official Statements June • Price and market securities • Close Series 2000 Refunding COPS \YVEmbvic1Y 4bWpmtivlBwNK R"WbWa'1 WAg" R•pp•�141•I.JW R. aaR,• Page 4 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Resolution No. OCSD 00-06 2. Articles of Incorporation for Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation 3. Bylaws of Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation 4. Financing Schedule NtlaWo41Yq Ao\opeMa\RooN IyeMo 0.epaY�llO BmN PperAv RepaG`dOMen 1<(�Erc Ren t: emee Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00-06 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE FORMATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (the "District") previously financed the acquisition, construction and installation of certain improvements to its wastewater system (the "Project") through the incurrence of certain obligations; WHEREAS, in order to refinance such obligations, the District desires to cause the formation of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation, a nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Corporation"); WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District (the "Board") has been presented with the form of the Articles of Incorporation for the Corporation (the "Articles of Incorporation") and the Bylaws for the Corporation (the "Bylaws"), and the Board has examined and approved such documents and desires to authorize and direct the execution and filing thereof; WHEREAS, all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of California to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with the actions authorized hereby do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as required by law, and the District is now duly authorized and empowered, pursuant to each and every requirement of law, to consummate such actions for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms herein provided; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, as follows: Section 1. All of the recitals herein contained are true and correct and the Board so finds. Section 2. The formation of the Corporation is hereby approved, and the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, in substantially the form presented to this meeting, are hereby approved. Section 3. The Director of Finance/Treasurer of the District (the "Director of Financerrreasuref) is hereby authorized and directed to act as sole incorporator of the Corporation and, in so acting, is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and file or cause to be filed with the California Secretary of State, the Articles of Incorporation in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the Director of Finance/Treasurer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and filing thereof. Section 4. The Director of Finance/Treasurer, acting as sole incorporator of the Corporation, is hereby authorized and directed to adopt as the bylaws of the Corporation the Bylaws in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the Director of Financerrreasurer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the adoption thereof. Section 5. The Director of Finance/Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file, or cause to be filed, such documents and forms with such governmental authorities as are necessary to complete the formation of the Corporation and to establish its status as a tax-exempt entity, including an Exemption Application to the State Franchise Tax Board (Form FTB 3500) and Power of Attorney relating thereto (Form FTB 3520), Federal Forms Nos. 1024 (Application for Recognition of Exemption under Section 501(c)(4), 2W (Power of Attorney) and SS-4 (Application for Employer identification Number). Section 6. The officers and employees of the District are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things which they may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the actions herein authorized and otherwise to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution. Section 7. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the District with respect to the transactions set forth above are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of April, 2000. Chair of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District [Seal] Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District 2 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE I, Penny Kyle, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said District duly and regularly held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 26th day of April, 2000, of which meeting all of the members of said Board of Directors had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present; and that at said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: An agenda of said meeting was posted at least 72 hours before said meeting at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California 92708, a location freely accessible to members of the public,and a brief general description of said resolution appeared on said agenda. I further certify that I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office;that the foregoing resolution is a full,true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and that said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect. Dated: 2000 Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District oasurauosss ursra 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OFINCORPORATOR The undersigned, as sole incorporator of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, hereby takes the following action by written consent pursuant to Section 5134 of the California Corporations Code: RESOLVED, that the Bylaws of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation, in the form hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted and approved and shall stand as the Bylaws of this Corporation until valid amendment thereof. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the undersigned sole incorporator has taken this action by written consent as of ,2000. Gary G. Streed Incorporator Dotsul:saersss snsso • ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION ARTICLE I The name of this corporation is Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation. ARTICLE II This corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public purposes. The specific and primary purposes for which this corporation is formed are: (a) To render financial assistance to the Orange County Sanitation District (the"District"), by the financing, refinancing,acquiring,constructing, improving, leasing and selling of public facilities and real and personal property for the use and benefit of the District. (b) To acquire by lease, purchase or otherwise, real or personal property or any interest therein; to construct, reconstruct, modify, add to, improve or otherwise acquire or equip buildings, structures or improvements and (by sale, lease, sublease, lease-back, gift or otherwise) make any part or all of any such real or personal property available to or for the benefit of the District. (c) To borrow the necessary funds to pay the cost of financing, refinancing, acquiring, constructing, replacing, establishing, improving, maintaining, equipping and operating such properties, and facilities for the herein described purposes, the indebtedness for which borrowed money may, but need not,be evidenced by securities of this corporation of any kind or character issued at any one or more times, which may be either unsecured or secured by any mortgage, trust deed, pledge, encumbrance or other lien upon any part or all of the properties and assets at any time then or thereafter owned or acquired by this corporation. (d) To receive limited or conditional gifts or grants in trust, inter vivos, or by way of testamentary devises, bequests or grants in trust, or otherwise, funds of all kinds including property, both real, personal and mixed, whether principal or income, tangible or intangible,present or future, vested or contingent, in order to carry on the purposes of this corporation. DOCSLAWM465.2 a195s-9 Incidental to and in order to carry out the foregoing purposes, this corporation shall have and possess, subject to the provisions of these Articles of Incorporation, all powers now or hereafter conferred upon nonprofit public benefit corporations by the laws of the State of California,with the following limitation: this corporation shall never engage in any activity other than such activities as may be incidental to and for the purpose of carrying out the primary purposes for which this corporation is formed as set forth above. ARTICLE III The name and address in the State of California of this corporation's initial agent for service of process is: Gary G. Streed Director of Finance/Treasurer Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 ARTICLE IV This corporation is organized as a nonprofit public benefit corporation, without capital stock and without members. This corporation is organized and operated exclusively for social welfare purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(4)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. No gains, profits or dividends shall be distributed to any of the directors or officers of this corporation, and no part of the net earnings, funds or assets of this corporation shall inure to the benefit of any director, officer or individual, or any other person, firm or corporation excepting only the United States of America, the State of California, or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof,or to a nonprofit fund,foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable or social welfare purposes and which has established its tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. No part of the activities of this corporation shall consist of carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, nor shall it participate in, or intervene in, or publish or distribute statements concerning, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated to the United States of America, the State of California, or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof, or to a nonprofit fund, foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable or social welfare purposes and which has established its tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; provided, however, that until all debts and obligations of this corporation shall have been paid,such property and any net revenues therefrom may be used for the purpose of paying and retiring the debts and obligations of this corporation. ARTICLE V During the continuance of this corporation, it may distribute any of its assets to the United States of America, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof, to a nonprofit fund, foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for oorsrw1:338465.2 4vssa 2 charitable or social welfare purposes and which has established its tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3)or 501(c)(4)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Upon the dissolution or winding up of this corporation, its assets remaining after payment of, or provision made for the payment of, all debts and liabilities of this corporation, shall be distributed to the United States of America, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof, or to a nonprofit fund, foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable or social welfare purposes and which has established its tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3)or 501(c)(4)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole incorporator of this corporation,has executed these Articles of Incorporation, as of the_day of ,2000. Gary G. Streed Incorporator nocsr.ar:338465.2 av5&7 3 BYLAWS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION ARTICLE I OFFICES AND SEAL Section 1.01 Offices. The principal office of the Corporation for the transaction of business shall be 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Board of Directors may, however, change from time to time the principal office from one location to another by noting the change of address in the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors at which the address was changed. The changing of such address shall not be deemed an amendment to these Bylaws. Section 1.02 Seal. The Corporation shall have a seal, consisting of two (2) concentric circles with the words "Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation," with the date of incorporation of the Corporation. ARTICLE 1I DIRECTORS Section 2.01 Powers. Subject to the limitations of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation,the terms of these Bylaws, and the laws of the State of California,the powers of the Corporation shall be vested in and exercised by and its property controlled and its affairs conducted by the Board of Directors. Section 2.02 Number. The Corporation shall have same number of directors as the number of directors on the District Board. Directors are collectively to be known as the Board of Directors. The number of Directors may be changed by a Bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted by the Board of Directors. Section 2.03 Selection,Tenure of Office and Vacancies. The individuals who act as the members of the Board of Directors (the "District Board") of the (range County Sanitation District (the "District') shall constitute the Board of Directors of the Corporation, and each member of the District Board shall be and remain a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for so long as such member remains a member of the District Board. Section 2.04 Compensation. Directors shall serve without compensation, but each Director may be reimbursed his or her necessary and actual expenses, including travel incident to his or her services as Director, pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors. Any Director may elect,however,to decline said reimbursement. nOrsw1:333465s 4rrssa new member of the District Board is elected to fill such Director's position on the District Board. Such resignation shall take effect at the time specified therein, and, unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. Section 2.10 Nonliability for Debts. The private property of the Directors shall be exempt from execution or other liability for any debts, liabilities or obligations of the Corporation and no Director shall be liable or responsible for any debts, liabilities or obligations of the Corporation. Section 2.11 Indemnity by Corporation for Litigation Expenses of Officers, Directors and Employees. (a) For the purposes of this section, "agent" shall mean any person who is or was a director, officer or employee of the Corporation. (b) For the purposes of this section,"proceeding"shall mean any threatened,pending or completed action or proceeding, whether civil,criminal,administrative or investigative. (c) For the purposes of this section, "expenses" shall mean, without limitation, attorney fees and any expenses incurred in the defense of the proceeding. (d) In the event of any proceeding brought against an agent of the Corporation, either alone or with others (other than an action by or in the name of the Corporation, an action brought under section 5233 of the California Corporations Code, or an action brought by the California Attorney General for any breach of duty relating to assets held in charitable trust) by reason of the fact that person was an agent of the Corporation,the Corporation shall indemnify that person against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such proceeding, if that person acted in good faith and in a manner that person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the Corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding,had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of that person was unlawful. (e) In the event of a proceeding brought against an agent of the Corporation, either alone or with others, is brought by or in the right of the Corporation, or brought under section 5233 of the California Corporations Code, or brought by the California Attorney General for breach of any duty for any breach of duty relating to assets held in charitable trust, by reason of the fact that person was an agent of the Corporation,the Corporation shall indemnify that person against expenses actually and reasonably incurred if that person acted in good faith, in a manner that person believed to be in the best interest of the Corporation and with such care, including reasonably inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. (f) Expenses incurred in defending any proceeding may be advanced by the Corporation prior to the final disposition of such proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the agent to repay such amount if it shall be determined ultimately that the agent is not entitled to be indemnified. The agent's obligation to reimburse may be unsecured and no interest shall be charged thereon. DOCRAW36665.2 41758.7 3 ' Section 3.06 Vice President. In the absence or disability of the President, the Vice President, or the Vice Presidents in order of their ranks as fixed by the Board of Directors, or if not ranked, the Vice President designated by the Board of Directors, shall perform all the duties of the President and when so acting shall have all the powers of and be subject to all of the restrictions upon the President. The Vice Presidents shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may from time to time be prescribed for them, respectively, by the Board of Directors or by these Bylaws. Section 3.07 Secretary. The Secretary shall keep or cause to be kept a book of minutes at the principal office or at such other place as the Board of Directors may order, of all meetings of the Directors, with the time and place of holding, whether regular or special, and if special, how authorized, the notice thereof given, the names of those present at Directors' meetings and the proceedings thereof. The Secretary shall give or cause to be given notice of all meetings of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, shall keep the corporate records in safe custody and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or these Bylaws. Section 3.08 Treasurer. The Treasurer shall keep and maintain or cause to be kept and maintained adequate and correct amounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses. The books of account shall at all times be open to inspection by any Director. The Treasurer shall deposit all moneys and other valuables in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Directors. He or she shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as shall be ordered by the Board of Directors, shall render to the President and the Directors whenever they shall request it, an account of all of his or her transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation, shall take proper vouchers for all disbursements of the funds of the Corporation, and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by these Bylaws. Section 3.09 Assistant Secretaries and Assistant Treasurers. The Assistant Secretaries and the Assistant Treasurers in the order of their seniority as specified by the Directors shall, in the absence or disability of the Secretary or the Treasurer, respectively, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Secretary or Treasurer and shall perform such duties as the Board of Directors shall prescribe. ARTICLE IV OBJECTS AND PURPOSES Section 4.01 Nature of Objects and Purposes. The business of the Corporation is to be operated and conducted in the promotion of its objects and purposes as set forth in Article II of its Articles of Incorporation. Section 4.02 Dissolution. The Corporation may be dissolved by vote of the Directors, or by the action of the Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of California law. Upon the dissolution of the Corporation, and after payment or provision for payment, all debts and liabilities, the assets of the Corporation shall be distributed to the District. If for any reason DOCSI.A1:338"S.2 4vss-7 5 the District is unable or unwilling to accept the assets of the Corporation, said assets will be ` distributed to the Federal Government,to a state or local government for public purposes, or to a nonprofit fund, foundation, or corporation which is organized and operated for charitable purposes and which has established its tax-exempt status under section 501(cx3)or 501(cx4)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Section 4.03 Merger. The Corporation may merge with other corporations organized solely for nonprofit purposes, qualified and exempt from Federal taxation pursuant to section 501(cx3) or 501(cx4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and from State taxation, upon compliance with the provisions of California law relating to merger and consolidation. ARTICLE V GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 5.01 Payment of Money, Signatures. All checks, drafts or other orders for payment of money, notes or other evidences of indebtedness issued in the name of or payable to the Corporation and any and all securities owned by or held by the Corporation requiring signature for transfer shall be signed or endorsed by such person or persons and in such manner as from time to time shall be determined by the Board of Directors. Section 5.02 Execution of Contracts. The Board of Directors,except as in the Bylaws otherwise provided, may authorize any officer or officers, agent or agents, to enter into any contract or execute any contract or execute any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation and such authority may be general or confined to specific instances and unless so authorized by the Board of Directors, no officer, agent or employee shall have any power or authority to bind the Corporation by any contract or engagement or to pledge its credit or to render it liable for any purpose or in any amount. Section 5.03 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Corporation shall commence on the 1st day of July of each year and shall end on the 30th day of June of the next succeeding year. ARTICLE VI EXEMPT ACTIVITIES Notwithstanding any other provisions of these Bylaws, no Director, officer, employee or representative of the Corporation shall take any action or carry on any activity by or on behalf of the Corporation not permitted to be taken or carried on by an organization exempt under section 501(cx3) or 501(cx4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1996, as amended, and the Regulations promulgated thereunder as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended. oorstwnasauss uosw 6 } ARTICLE VII AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS These Bylaws may be amended by majority vote of the Board of Directors. ADOPTED by the Incorporator of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation on 2000. Gary G. Streed Incorporator nocst.nl:atasss.z u7s8-7 7 ` April 5,2000 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Series 2000 Refunding COPS Financing Schedule S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 9 10 I l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 27 28 29 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 Date Activity Responsibility Jan 14 x I"draft of Installment Purchase Agreement distributed BC Jan 20 x Kick-off meeting to discuss legal stricture All-Hands Feb 3 x Review 1"draft of ratings presentation and revised cashflows OCSD,PW (9:00 am. at District) Feb. 9 x FAHR Committee meeting(5:00 p.m.) OCSD x Financing progress report OCSD,PW Feb 10 x 1"draft of P.O.S.distributed UC Feb 14 It I"draft of Trust Agreement distributed BC Feb 17 x Meeting to review legal documents and P.O.S. All-Hands (10:00 a.m.at OH&S) Feb 21 x Market Holiday(President's Day) Mar 8 It FAHR Committee meeting(5:00 p.m.) OCSD x Financing progress report OCSD,PW Mar 9 x 21d draft of legal documents distributed BC x 2n°draft of P.O.S distributed UC PaineWebber April 5,2000 Mar 14 x Meeting to review legal documents and P.O.S. All-Hands (10:00 am.at OH&S) Week of3120x Begin preparing package for liquidity banks PW Mar 22 x District Board meeting OCSD,PW Mar24 x 3i°draft of P.O.S distributed UC Week of327x Commence discussions with Ambac and swap providers Ply x Continue revising rating agency presentation OCSD,PW Mar 28 x Meeting to review legal documents and P.O.S. All-Hands (10:30 am.at OH&S) Mar 30 x Meeting to review cashflows ratings presentation OCSD,PW (1:00 pm.m District) Apr 5 x Agendize non-profit corporation formation materials BC,OCSD Apr 6 Meeting to review rating agency presentation(tentative) OCSD,PW Apr 12 • FAHR Committee meeting(5:00 pm.) OCSD Approval of non-profit Financing Corporation OCSD,BC • Financmg progress report OCSD,PW Apr 13 • Rebearsal for rating agency presentations(tentative) OCSD,PW Apr 18119 • Rating agency presentations(at District) OCSD,PW Apr 21 Market Holiday(GoodFriday) Apr 26 • District Board meeting OCSD Approval of non-profit Financing Corporation OCSD,BC May 3 Receipt of ratings(tentative) OCSD,PW May 10 • FAHR Committee mating(5:00 p.m.) OCSD • Approval of bond documents OCSD,BC,PW May 14 • District Board/Financing Corporation meetings OCSD Approval of bond documents OCSD,BC,PW May 25 • Print Official Statement UC,PW Begin pre-marketing COPS PW May 26 • Mail Official Statement OCSD,PW PaineWebber ` April 5,2000 May 29 Market Holiday(Memorial Day) May 30 . Price advance refunding of Series B OCSD,PW (Establish faed rate through August 2001) June 13 . Price current refunding of Series A&C OCSD,PW (Daily VRDOs,Sold no less than 15 days aJkr Series B) June 14 . Close all refunding components All-Hands 8/1/01 . Series B CON called with escrow funds X — Denorescompleredacrivity. Rey Role Participants OCSD Issuer Oanae Cou Sunlusion Didritt B on Dome Omck mnglon um r rw undcr mr PaincWebberinm med UC ndcrwnler's Comael Ilesvaim,Deldfreld&Woad PaineWebber FAHR COMMITTEE 11Tn' ate TOX6& ,I12/00 4/26/00 AGENDA REPORT )tam WrnE Rem Number FANROM130 14(U Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 00-07, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. SUMMARY The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) HM CbYewW�, R��pMW RNdV'pIXAMn1 ��).Os Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy Number From To Reason And Subject For Change CI I0.00-Travel and Suelness current language. Proposed language. To reduce potetal abuse Expense; and increase accountabllry of staff. D10.O Lsava of Absence WM Pay Currant language. Proposed language. AB109 compliance and MOU reference. D20.004Leave or Absence Wehout Pay Current language. Proposed language. ABI 09 complorace,FMIA compliance and clarification on'Nmr for leaves of absence. DMOD-Hoklsys Current language. Proposed language. Clarificabon on eligibility for employees on disability leave and holiday calendar. 040.00-Confe ri of Leave Current language. Proposed language. Chang.'one-time' donation of leave time to a 'case4oy<aae'basis for donation. D60.00-Bene6b Option Plan(BOP) Current language. Proposed language. Language added to clarify when employees are eligible for BOP. DID0.M Technical and Professional Current The:Technical Proposed Tile: Title change only. Liceme,Registration and Certification and Professional Certification Reimbursement Program License,Reglatration Reimbursement Program. and Cedif¢ation Reimbursement Program. E60.041mernet Usage Current language. Proposed language. To reflect and incorporate the changes In technology with regard to the use of the Internet. E70.00-E-mail Usage No Policy. New Poll y. To formalize the administration of E-mail usage. F21D.00-Houra of Work-NoreEaampt Current language. Proposed language. FLSA compliance and Employees management designee may process other employees*time sheets. F20.16Houra of Work-Exempt Cunem language. Proposed language. FLSA compliance and Employees management designee may process other amployeeetime sheets. F70.00-Dleclpllne Current language. Proposed language. Changes make policy congruent weh MOU's and practice. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A H 4ry eGOpe,d, rd Agenda Rep'15 avrd Agenda nepawsM ern 1e(e)he Page 2 • o. v ATTACHMENTS 1. Policy C110.00 Travel and Business Expenses 2. Policy D10.00 Leave-of-Absence With Pay 3. Policy D20.00 Leave-of-Absence Without Pay 4. Policy D30.00 Holidays 5. Policy D40.00 Conferral of Leave 6. Policy D60.00 Benefits Option Plan 7. Policy D100.00 Technical and Professional License, Registration and Certification Reimbursement Program 8. Policy E60.00 Internet Usage 9. Policy E70.00 E-mail Usage 10.Policy F20.00 Hours of Work-Non-Exempt Employees 11.Policy F20.10 Hours of Work-Exempt Employees 12.Policy F70.00 Discipline H N.y.EbIYUMaHVN�9^be ReN d\1PLRmN/peMv ReRMtlMWlten 1Ne)We Page 3 9 Orange County Policy Number: C110.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: TRAVEL AND BUSINESS Supersedes: May 13, 1998 EXPENSES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for reimbursing employees for travel and business expenses. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.9---DEFINLT40NS 3.1 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the DistneYSse policy to reimburse employees for travel and business expenses in accordance with the procedures of this policy. &0 PROCEDURE 5.1 The Districts will reimburse employees for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in the course of representing the Districts on official business provided that approval is obtained in advance. All reimbursement claims for such expenses must be submitted on a Requectigc Travel AWperiaatieaaad Expense Reimbursement form; dpe'n�Se`;8`r+eafr't10 h [oigi[ rFa1[e_"j�fnTr�iyJ aa@5— Y iir ""iSCs. d. lgAll 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6 1 �tp e'IG�b�7r'Z'd e?' 1' �peH e3EZCRilbet.�YRe1 )lird8$dr'an 0 {W. 0 ditil:{ " ' taae'd;h" ieSEle a"'f H&HcadS t,g'uP-ll fa J! ort cued;`a�`th,' PP9e± 62 Bus - - it eds561 izose ,m u�`�pago�aT,irrcyp'afs!. ceeci Page 1 of M Act -P ,r,... .o b{ISSCr�a�c: IflrnJ4YPr ,Btt2a _ .. dir10 anfount,�Ul ad} idLhadrbg'en deed]. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 Gam' NERIf'C,'If�7sf' 71T/QA] 7.1.1 -r+T, e'FA'1F�"6r a't m fdl ntS,__milFed;�ndl laset_v"gG' i�da�SI°_F�as�G21 ' dvahse�3� o take advantage of discounted or reduced fares, etc. 7.1.2 o-b;-TsTfes io sl��JJ,,eiforge6;i p"Tadn9`'it!,i bi 3e� �bT,�? .,el eimb`yrsert�len�+'yfolrp, i'A?is responsi`� fora mitbniN ��2Lt 7.1.3 b inafj 1i ts�are.!rFg„qui j a"Iftreimb-uir�8le;e s�"s aldfe�ss_or Lava "'PIL 7fi bA aa�-`fie"�1�eimESr�emeFli io`dJd[be' sdb jWIIhnY3WbY, ' after'the9relmbifri,Nusin>3ss'e $nse;N" 7.1.5 Employees are to exercise every effort to minimize travel and meeting expenditures. When alternatives are available,the employee will utilize the least expensive alternative. 77M6 r I a.,, : r- o�natonv_rilfraSdtEa' ¢®,�,,; R&y'"ue�FYo2 T_F�a_ae_ � .pe,,nse e, tfseme°r�iC,�'fo�5in Isignry- m IsK+rL �-- {Tr '�f"' 6ng.`: wit°OryPPrIP._ ' 7.1.7 The]aeelyf�IIhed3olrMhe'ReytYesfio1rF[,a §ltbc{Jense Reimtiy dt Tartu nrtdtal"ns@bc4n*d,�segnlpidy'ees Pedrh�t xm B- +;gym oo 7.1.8 Of Mn FwanA p, 1 Rtls ayel e8ff?�ead fin "G`T^Li wb N ?P met�nyltOPappear on a panel or to give a presentation on behalf of the Districts pF OP IMF#aR appFgval must haw . Failure to do so may preclude attendance. based OR-Pdoc app evak MRMl;QP�9;64atigA fee, 7.2 494-G—IN Page 2 of 8 7.2.1 Lodging shall be in a hotel, motel or lodge. otelfmotel rooms must be standard (single occupancy) rather than deluxe accommodations. The employee must pay lodging expenses directly and include the original detailed hotel receipt with the'Travel Expense Reimbursement'form before reimbursement will be made. Direct billings to the District for employee lodging will not be accepted unless the circumstances are unavoidable and written authorization from the General Manager's office is obtained in advance. Meals or other reimbursable charges on the hotel bill will be applied towards the daily reimbursement maximum 29awrt36o-per d am aWwaasa 7.2.2 Making Reservations -When making hotel reservations, always ask for the lowest available rate the hotel is offering(e.g.,government,season special),which may be lower than the convention/conference rate. 7.2.3 Canceling Reservations-A traveler canceling the reservation must do so according to the hotel's policy in order to avoid charges. The District does not reimburse for non-canceled reservations, early departure, or late cancellation charges unless approved by the Department Head via an "Exceptions-Unauthorized Expenditures"memo. 7.3 GROUND TRANSPORTATION 7.3.1 Employees must select the most economical, practical means of ground transportation that is appropriate for the particular site. The reimbursable distance for departures is the distance between the last stop(e.g., District or employee's residence)and the terminal, and for arrivals is the distance between the terminal and the first stop(e.g., District or employee residence).Automobile mileage reimbursement is given if an employee is required to use a personal vehicle for travel within the District's general geographical area, which includes Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, Imperial and Kern Counties. aYewanceF The District shall pay local transportation costs from the employee=s residence to the departure airport. If the employee uses their personal vehicle,then mileage will be paid at the current IRS-approved rate. Alternate travel to a departing airport shall be by bus, shuttle or taxi only. 7.3.2 Reimbursement for personal auto usage for business will be calculated per the current Internal Revenue Service Guideline. This rate is subject to change. 7.3.3 Round-trip mileage expenses can be reimbursed when family chauffeuring is the most economical alternative. 7.3.4 District vehicles may not be used to transport non-District employees. 7.3.5 Page 3 of 8 7.3.6 Travel while at the local destination sh"may be by shuttle, bus or taxi, r as needed. A rental car may be allowed. 7.3.7 Parking at the departure airport s reimbursable with receipts. T4 AUTORENTALS 7A.1 Rented autos should only be used when no other means of transportation is economically feasible. Use of airport or hotel shuttles is encouraged. 7.4.2 Class size-Intermediate or standard model, mid-size car(Class C), or the smallest size compatible with the specific need, are to be used. Exceptions must be explained on an'Exceptions-Unauthorized Expenditures" memo signed by the Department Head. The original copy of the car rental contract and receipt must be attached to the"Travel Expense Reimbursement"form. 7.4.3 Insurance—The District is insured or self-insured for damage to rental cars used on company business. ONLYthe "Loss Damage Waiver Fee"Is to be accepted and is reimbursable. Any additional insurance purchased for the rental car is not reimbursable. 7.4.4 Rental Contract-When completing the rental agency contract,sign for the District, not as an individual (i.e. Orange County Sanitation District, CA, by(your name). 7.4.5 Gas Surcharge—The District will not pay fuel surcharges. 7.4.6 Damage-In the event of damage to rental cars, all details of the event reported to the police and/or the rental fimr must also be provided to the District Safety Manager within 24 hours of the incident 7.5 AIR TRAVEL 7.5.1 The District centralizes airline and rental car reservations for business travel through Worldview Travel in order to gain efficiency and obtain cost savings. Numbers to call for reservations and ticket delivery are: Business Worldview Travel Contact Person Cherie Lowe Address District Travel Consultant 535 Anton Blvd., Suite 160 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Business Phone (714) 540-7400 Business Phone 2 1-800-627-8726 Business FAX (714)979.6040 E-mail cherie@worldview.com Page 4 of 8 Web Page hftp://www.worldviewtmvel.com The Worldview Travel Agency will determine air travel routes,class of service, carriers, and auto rentals according to company policy. The lowest practical airfare including discounts and non-refundable fares shall be selected. An employee will not be reimbursed for airline tickets obtained from an unauthorized source unless it is an emergency. 7.5.2 Airline Reservations-Employees must not make company business arrangements directly with airlines, other travel agencies, or use an Internet service for business travel. Such transactions must go through designated travel coordination staff for the District to claim its negotiated rebates on volume purchases. Ticketing must occur within 24 hours of making the reservation to preserve the quoted airfare price. 7.5.3 Frequent Flyer Miles-Employees who belong to frequent flyer programs are entitled to personally use all bonuses accrued by them on company business. Under no circumstances, however, may employees purchase more expensive tickets in order to accumulate frequent flier mileage or upgrade the class of service. First or Business Class upgrades maybe used as long as the ticket still represents the lowest practical airfare. 7.5.4 Excess Baggage Fees—The District will not reimburse for excess baggage fees if not related to company business. This includes sporting equipment. 7.5.5 Alternative Airports-Altemative airports within close proximity(Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Ontario)must be used if the savings exceed$150. 7.5.6 Lost Ticket Application—Once an employee accepts a District paid ticket, he or she is responsible for it. If an employee loses a ticket, the replacement of the District-paid ticket and all related fees are the employee's responsibility. Worldview Travel may not be used for this purpose; however, employees must contact Worldview Travel immediately, requesting them to file a Lost Ticket Application with the airline. If and when the District is reimbursed, the employee will be entitled to the cost of the original ticket less any fees incurred. Employees must take extra precautions to avoid losing ticket(s),which result in extra fees and delays for refunds. 7.5.7 Unused Flight Tickets—Unused flight tickets must be returned to division clerical staff within seven days of issuance. Clerical staff will retain the unused flight ticket for future District air travel by the same person. 7.5.8 Ticket Changes—The District will pay the additional fee to change a ticketed flight only if the travel is required by the traveler's supervisor and an"Exceptions- Unauthorized Expenditures" memo is completed, signed by the Department Head and submitted with the"Travel Expense Reimbursement"form. If the change is for the convenience of the traveler, no reimbursement will be allowed. 7.5.9 Flight Limitations—There should be no more than 4 District Employees total per flight. This will be monitored by the travel agency. T5.10 Saturday Night Stay-over—The District may require a Saturday night stay-over if the stay-over results in significant cost savings to the District In general, it is expected that business meetings that start on Tuesday or end on Thursday wilt Page 5 of 8 SaTrlilf�ay?3� bs"6'�`;per �is'esar' ieuFi6ursa`3e, n eumoftheafrtar pius'+t�e`fi' s �es1o„ IGe�ai6o`�'e(dod3 8 r5�e?�SI�1rtpdentalsresulbhg�irum then ,�mreyr� -� �� `- ���ile;a dare-v_,intlroutfifle stayover. 7.6 IpEA17. 1 fddEN'6 7.6.1 btexnpoe�vi^Es m s` y-wsb P a2' 3: 6' m `'a. ap s oodeo yDepeg �edpub e - c Leumineu0srA5iPm a a'llowance�i't�Ifor mGderi�ls i 7.62 Wfienla+Winilln nn nor� sr_noCmw"'-lye:o_ve'rtm.;glit'stay;lta he pop diem r4 reiirl6irrsegient willke-prorated-based-ea Sha'-1I.'a'oEexr dthefollowing tiiaimiium5; -40 00-pec day.(Breakfast $6.00; Lunch:$10.00; Dinner: $18.0%. R_i are�re`gSG r`"ieTm�ur;emeiii ?Fwempreyse.shall not bo Coupty mq AUagea-fea• 7.6.3 •_. _ .�IL..,.......,.. r...b.w :.. e....a.... -i v .....d:..... :u..�L..�ew.:�F..du ,... 7fit4—'P.W%4MWdaa7s?.fiAealaxpens�esnotreirtifiucsabTerfi�iumaheil parCo ereven� riifiiled+byb8r"ors,or indud41-_ -_' -;As. 77.r�. UP_}7CP_EfJSEt2E/AIBURSEMENT; ---v p^eegPoo --v 1=1@i�✓;y- too not p`r (as7oriie'm i er�of' r9m_u�'may shad cia A a� drvid fcr�w�iogi,ih ns-'--ti,&n ,fumed '�iR1nt>,>b�tces�7'moN� O,f,,�11HICprCr10Y, dihtl_•-.dUBt—•.. _II'1&.OIYBR aw��e_f�Rl�l�o'yee9�'a`sia 7: >v'�r'T.,C B/N1NG` !fSIN�S'8%dAD,'PERSOHAL IN (VEL Page 6 of`8 7.8.1 If an employee combines business and personal travel, the personal travel expenses will be paid directly by the employee. For trips in which the primary purpose is personal, the District pays only that portion of the trip directly related to business. 7.8.2 Business travel is based on actual business expenses incurred. Therefore, no adjustment is permitted between expense categories(e.g.. funding extra airfare expense in exchange for reduced lodging in a private home on a personal side trip). 7.8.3 In general, it is not appropriate for family members to accompany employees on business trips. Any costs incurred on behalf of family members are not reimbursable. 7.9 FOREIGN TRAVEL 7.9.1 Regardless of when expense reports are submitted,the exchange rate for converting foreign currency expenses into U.S. dollars will be the rate in effect at the time the U.S.dollars are convened to foreign currency and supported by receipts. 7.10 TELEPHONECALLS 7.10.1 Business telephone calls and modem services are reimbursable with receipt. On overnight stays, a$4.25 per day allowance is provided for personal telephone calls. Prwuaterl 7.11 CASH ADVANCE 7.11.1 Cash advances may be requested for overnight stays only FOR EMERGENCY PURPOSES ONLY. The minimum request amount per trip is$100. The maximum request amount is$250 per trip. To receive a cash advance,the traveler is required to complete a'Request for Emergency Cash Advance'form, obtain proper signatures and submit the completed form to the Accounting Division. 7.12 NON-REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 7.12.1 Expenses that are personal(not directly connected with District business) are not reimbursable unless there are extenuating circumstances approved by the General Manager. These include, but are not limited to the following:Fxpeaesec aad-Parseaa4ifems- • Clothing and toiletries • Personal side trips, personal entertainment and personal trip insurance Fees for use of recreational, health and gym facilities • Home maintenance, baby sitting and pet boarding expenses Po_c 7 of 8 v �Le i [ne td'Qerisonal properly such�sl�g�geJ a-. �dent�Ce �t rresul6ng from�n�mpTo�_e_'s •`^4 '�"`�to 'T5� •� ecliol 713_�f0�5��NfND�R-R�J141�Ui2S7_'D EXBENSES "Imp a�te�R n, urg p a 's',ar So der�eimbu t3Z 6y ah e`0"do74a9,4 do�s� ronde'a�letterlo.fhe �r � reunbW,4seds. ,' cco n the po @ s��utsementadragew"fha v It Mr sr .. 0 e� s alen�e�or�pas.,agreed� �tnb` e os'4ea`a`co � --z We " ,endo�WtOnra�on,l �nd;eeple's „ �- ,��letteats'�a.A r��IoemPloyee;and`1o,lheAoc,�r� RP��.. '�"u"nt�rbnen�so�hat ,�meM eanbe crgdded'to_tfie, 771 LIMB(lRSE6fE_ ;FO1tNO7Kb/STRICT'EMPGOYEE'S 7.14.1 ,N .° thsQ,...ctireq iersftav ;e"'1„'MaSot„F�`,eii;B�ctoa onybe �e I�ftose oes' n�Heatl.�S�all prepe`�" �auNoe-", 'avo lip 9'ftreiel5yhe e1aY„iE,< erlt'.IBQI� Y000FOf 'OirL�iPayable'�='forajp,�ess'icng� �f»�of°tlieauM�r¢a11Qn_(elter shalffa'"��.�'��PhaYmenfljeiji est��vo�cfier�_ 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8A "Ragaestlec Travel Autheriaatiea.aaA Expense Reimbursement" form 8.2 aiJy it ens_e B�kWo�-: rm 8.3 '7RRR� n".iof rm 8.4 L eyVOn§=.Una' p' Ra .$M i. 8.6 8.6 CSOOG OPS9 Administrative Standards and Procedures Guidelines, Section III-22, Travel and Training Page 8 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT REQUEST FOR TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Aherapproval,submit this form,a complored Daily Expense Bmakdown Form and rece/pis to Tmining or Accounts Payable. Recelprs are w be v taped to 6-1/2xll white sheets. If expense metals are missing,an approved`*Exceptions Memo-mustalso be attached to the package. Eml > _ .;. a's�N'e'Ar�. �.GtX:,4�`iP Emp. Name: No. Date: Meeting: Training:El Purpose: Duration: From: To: Site/Location: ISO a ' PION $T'"'EL�e $Nk .�REC'ATE t EIRJS EQfll 03M., I N Amount DESCRIPTION Pre-Paid Actual Due Automobile: Co. Car: Personal Car; Miles: x$0.325 $ $ - Air Fare: $ $ Transportation: Car RentallShuttle/Taxi-including tips $ $ Parking Fees: $ - $ - Registration Fees: _OCSD Check or_Procard $ - $ - Meals: (receipts required—from Daily Expense Breakdown Form) $ - $ - Incidentals: ($6 per day allowance for overnight travel) $ - $ - Lodging Fees: (From Travel Detail Record) $ $ - Telephone Calls: Personal: P.25 per day Plus Business Calls and Faxr $ $ - Other Expenses_(Must attach"Exceptions Memo" �F,S�" §7. t�'$p'�i. �:? $ $ Emergency Cash Advance: (Subtract from Amount Due) $ $ Is $ 31�i3' NOTE: Attach explanation for any expense(s)to be reimbursed by an outside Agency/Vendor AMOUNT DUE: $ - uSk �3'°�` r��� r&kJ Division Manager: (To $2000) Data: Department Head: (Over$2000) Date: If for Training: Training Manager: Date: Preparer's Signature: Date: Ext. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the above expenses were incurred by me in connection with business for the District in accordance with the Policies set forth that said expenditures are true and just,and that payment thereof has not been received. Submission of fraudulent expenses shall be grounds for Immediate dismissal. NOTE:Costs incurred within the final 90 days of service will not be reimbursed unless specifically authorized. Employee Signature: Date: Ext. T.1 Eip aeYnd .M amVr2rel UW.11 m11 From F.q. 1 cfRevised TTTr3199 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DAILY EXPENSE BREAKDOWN RECORD (Totals are to be entered in Section II of Travel Expense Reimbursement Form. Attach this sheet and receipts ' that have been taped onto 8-112 x 11 white sheet(s) to Travel Expense Reimbursement Form and submit to Accounts Payable) OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES: Breakfast Lunch Dinner Daily ($34.00/day maximum) Date Weekday $ 6.00 $ 10.00 $ 18.00 Totals Include tax and tip. Receipts are $ - requiredfornambursement. NOTE: $6 per day is allowed for incidentals $ - for overnight travel only. This is to $ - be noted separately on Travel _ $ Expense Reimbursement form. $ $ 4TOTALJ$� LODGING Arrival Departure Room No.of Room Lodging Amount ACCOMMODATIONS: Date Date Type Nights Rate (#Nights x Rate) Hotel: $ Phone No: I $ - Confirmation No: TOTAL: $ - Detailed receipt required. AIRLINE INFORMATION: Date From To Depart Arrival Airfare Time Time Amount Airline Name: Departure Flight No.: Connection Flight No.: Return Flight No.: Connection Flight No.: Attach copy of itinerary and ticket receipt. TOTAL: $ - TRANSPORTATION: Term x Rental Fee Rate No. Days Rate x Tenn Car Rental Agency: $ - Confirmation No.: TRANSPORTATION GRAND TOTAL: $ - Attach detailed receipt A receipt must be provided for each expense for which reimbursement is requested. If for any reason a receipt cannot be provided, an "Exceptions Memo"to the Accounts Payable Dept. must accompany the Expense Reimbursement package that explains why a receipt has not been provided (e.g., lost, not issued,etc.). Otherwise, reimbursement will not be paid for the item(s) in questions. The Exceptions Memo shall be signed by the Department Head. Page 2 of 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION REQUEST Note:This form must be fully completed and submitted as an email attachment when requesting authorization from your immediate Supervisor to travel on OCSD business. SECTION I-EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Name: Empl.# 1 Date:I Meeting: ❑ Training: ❑ Purpose: Duration: I From: To: Location: SECTION II-BUDGET INFORMATION Subledger#or Fund Budget Div.# Object# Attendee Div.# Capital Project# Subsidiary#or Phase# SECTION III-ESTIMATED EXPENSES (LIST ALL BUSINESS-RELATED EXPENSES) Estimated Costs Comments Mileage: District Vehicle: ❑ Personal Vehicle: ❑ Miles: x$0.325 $ - Air Fare: Reg: $ Saturday Stay: $ $ Transportation: Car Rental/Shuttle/Taxi(including tips) $ Parking Fees: $ Meals: (Guideline:$6 Breakfast.$10 Lunch,$18 Dinner,$6 Incidentals) $ Registration Fees: $ Lodging Fees: $ Telephone Personal - $4.25 per day Calls: Plus Business Calls and Fax $ - EMERGENCY Cash Advance ($100 minimum. Overnight only) (Emergency Cash Advance Form required) $ TOTAL: $ Note: If any portion of the above expenses will be paid by an outside agency,written confirmation from the hosting agency must be submitted with this request. Mileage Information Trip will originate from: ❑OCSD ❑come ❑Other Departure Address: Destination Address: SECTION IV-How will this support the goals of the Division or the District? CERTIFICATION: By submitting this request, 1 agree to abide by current OCSD Policy and Procedures, understand that I must provide a receipt for each item for each reimbursement item and that failure to attend may impact my performance review. Revisea MOM April 4. 2000 MEMORANDUM TO: Accounts Payable FROM: SUBJECT: Training/Meeting Expense Reimbursement—Lost/Unavailable Receipts The following receipt(s) have been lost or are unavailable: 1. 2. Other expenses not pre-authorized: I incurred the following unforeseen expenses: 1. 2. Contact me at Ext._if you have questions. (Employee Signature) (Department Head Signature) REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY CASH ADVANCE EMPLOYEE NAME: AMOUNT: DATE DUEIPAYABLE: Employee ID No.: PREPARED BY: DATE: EMPLOYEE: DATE: SUPERVISOR: DATE: MANAGER: DATE: DEPARTMENT HEAD: DATE: FINANCE APPROVAL: DATE: PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION ITEM FUND# DIV# OBJ# NO' SUBLEDGER# CITY UNITPRICE TOTALAMOUNT 99 10538 $ Attach signed Justification Memo before submitting to Accounting. Emergency Cash Advances may only be used for overnight travel. Minimum Cash Advance amount: $100 Maximum Cash Advance amount:$250 ""'GRAYAREA FOR ACCOUNTING DIVISION USE ONLY SUPPLIER NUMBER INVOICE NUMBER SPECIAL HANDLING BATCH NUMBER VOUCHER NUMBER SECTION III 22.0 OFF-SITE MEETINGS AND TRAINING The District is committed to the standards of a "high-performance work place." In order to achieve this goal the District has made funds available, through the Annual Budget, to provide support in the development, implementation, and delivery of training programs, whether local or out of state. Forms for travel-meeting authorizations and expenses can be found in Ntglobal/Forms in the Travel and Meetings —Authorizations and Expenses folder. I. PRE-TRAVEL The following guidelines are in accordance with the District's Human Resources Policies and Guidelines, Policy C110, "Travel and Business Expenses." Please refer to this policy for specific provisions and conditions associated with this topic. A. AUTHORIZATION • District employees participating in off-site training functions or meetings must complete a "Request for Travel Authorization" form at least 21 days before the training function or meeting are to take place. This form is available in Outlook under Tools/Forms. • Upon completing the "Request for Travel Authorization" form, the form shall be forwarded to the employee's Department Head for approval. A copy of the approved form shall be forwarded to the Employee Development Division for budget tracking purposes. • The "Request for Travel Authorization"form shall remain in the employee's division, filed according to their divisional filing structure. This form does NOT need to accompany reimbursement packages or payment requests. B. REGISTRATION The designated division travel coordinators are responsible for registering division employees for training functions or meetings. Payment for registration is usually required before the date of the training function or meeting. To process registration payment the division travel coordinator shall: 4. Prepare a "Registration Payment Request Voucher" form Revision Date: 120100 Section III 22-1 4. Attach a copy of the registration form or supporting documentation to the "Registration Payment Request Voucher" form 4. Obtain proper division signatures 4. Forward the paperwork to the HR Employee Development Division (Training) for training events or the Accounting Division for meetings/conferences. NOTE: If the function is charged to 51520, 51530 or 51540, the paperwork must be submitted to the HR Employee Development Division (Training); if the function is being charged to 51420, 51430, 51440, the paperwork should be submitted directly to the Accounting Division. C. AIR TRAVEL 1. OCSD centralizes airline and rental car reservations for business travel through Worldview Travel in order to gain efficiency and obtain cost savings. Numbers to call for reservations and ticket delivery are: Business Worldview Travel Contact Person Cherie Lowe Address OCSD Travel Consultant 535 Anton Blvd., Suite 160 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Business Phone (714) 540-7400 Business Phone 2 1-800-627-8726 Business FAX (714) 979-6040 E-mail cherie@worldview.com Web Page http://www.worldviewtravel.com 2. Worldview Travel -The Worldview Travel Agency will determine air travel routes, class of service, carriers, and auto rentals according to company policy. The lowest practical airfare including discounts and non- refundable fares shall be selected. An employee will not be reimbursed for airline tickets obtained from an unauthorized source unless it is an emergency. 3. Airline Reservations - Employees must not make company business Revision Date: 1/20100 Section III 22-2 arrangements directly with airlines, other travel agencies, or use an on- line service for business travel. Such transactions must go through designated travel coordination staff for OCSD to claim its negotiated rebates on volume purchases. Ticketing must occur within 24 hours of making the reservation to preserve the airfare price quoted. 4. The Division Travel Coordinator is responsible for preparing the Airfare Blanket Purchase Order Request form as soon as a Flight is booked with the travel agent. This form is found in Ntglobal/Forms in the Travel and Meeting - Authorizations and Expenses folder. 5. Obtain proper division signatures on the Airfare Blanket Purchase Order Request form. 4. Forward the paperwork to the HR Employee Development Division (Training) for training events or the Accounting Division for meetings/conferences. NOTE: If the function is charged to 51520, 51530 or 51540, the paperwork must be submitted to the HR Employee Development Division (Training); if the function is being charged to 51420, 51430, 51440, the paperwork should be submitted directly to the Accounting Division. II. POST-TRAVEL A. Completing the Expense Reimbursement Form (step-by-Step Instructions) Before preparing the expense report, make sure all receipts are taped to 8-1/2x11 white sheets. If any are missing, an exceptions memo must be prepared detailing the date, the expense and the amount and why the lack of a receipt. The memo must be signed by the Department Head and attached to the Expense Reimbursement package. 1. Open Excel and g:\Ntglobai\forms\Travel and Meeting Expense folder. 2. Click on and open the Travel Expense Reimbursement Form document. 3. Click on the tab at the bottom of the screen named Daily Expense Breakdown worksheet. If completing the package by hand, print the form and complete in ink. If completing it on the computer, fill in the required information: A. Out-of-Pocket Expenses: Using either meal or hotel receipts, complete the daily expense form by noting actual expenses for meals including tax Revision Date: IM100 Section III 22-3 and tip. There is a $34/day maximum reimbursement for meal expenses. If meals are provided by airlines or included in registration additional reimbursement for that meal will not be allowed. B. Lodging Accommodations: Fill in requested information. This may be done prior to travel. A copy of the hotel/motel bill must be attached to the package. C. Airline Information: Fill in requested information. This may be done prior to travel. A copy of the itinerary and the ticket receipt are to be attached to the package. D. Transportation: If a rental car is used, complete this section. A copy of the receipt must be attached with the package. A copy of this form shall be included in the Travel Expense Package. 4. Click the tab at the bottom of the first worksheet entitled Travel Expense Reimbursement Form worksheet SECTION I — EMPLOYEE AND BUDGET INFORMATION Use the Tab key to move through the document. Fill in: Name Employee Number Today's Date Check whether a Meeting or Training Purpose Duration — From: To: Site/Location Complete the Accounting Information: Budget Div. # is the Division number the travel is charged to (either 520-Training or traveler's Division number. Object#- If travel is for Training, use 51530, if for meeting, use 51430. Attendee Div. # is the traveler's Division number. Subledger#or Capital Project# is for charging to specific projects. Subsidiary# or Phase # is for charging to specific projects. SECTION II — ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES Automobile: Check if using Company Car(mileage will not be reimbursed). If using Personal Car, figure mileage using Yahoo! Maps on the Internet. Mileage is reimbursed at current IRS rate. Air Fare: Insert fare from itinerary or ticket receipt. Revision Date: 1=100 Section III 22-4 Transportation: Insert total from Transportation section of Daily Expense Breakdown worksheet, or the total of expenses paid for taxis, shuttles, buses, etc. as evidenced by receipts. If receipts are missing or unavailable, then an Exceptions memo must be prepared and approved by Department head and submitted with the Expense package. Parking Fees: Total of all parking (hotel, event, airport) fees paid, evidenced by receipts. If receipts are missing or unavailable, then an Exceptions memo must be prepared and approved by Department head and submitted with the Expense package. Registration Fees: Place an 'x' before either OCSD Check or Procard to indicate how the registration was paid. Insert the amount in the prepaid section. If registration was paid on site, insert that amount in the "Actual" column, and attach a receipt as proof of expenditure. Meals: Insert total from Out-of-Pocket Expense section of Daily Expense Breakdown form. Incidentals: A $6 per day allowance is provided to cover incidentals. No receipts are required. Multiply the number of days of travel (overnight is 2) by $6 and insert that total. Lodging Fees: From the hotel/motel bill, insert the total charge for the room, including any taxes. Deduct other charges and include in the proper category, i.e. meals, telephone calls, parking, etc. Telephone Calls: A $4.25 per day allowance is provided for a personal call. All business calls and faxes, as evidenced by receipts, are reimbursable. If calls are made from a hotel/motel, the charges will appear on that bill. A 'P' (personal) or 'D' (District business) shall identify each call. If the traveler has a District-paid cellular phone, the $4.25 per day allowance may not be paid. Other Expenses: For expenses that can not be included in any of the above sections, prepare an Exceptions Memo detailing the expense and attach the receipt. Insert the total in the "Actual" box. Emergency Cash Advance: If the traveler has received an Emergency Cash Advance, insert the amount in the "(A) Pre-Paid) column. It will automatically be subtracted from the total amount due. At this point, save the document according to your division computer fling structure, Revision 0ate: 120100 Section III 22-5 using 'SAVE AS.' Print both worksheets. Staple the receipt sheets behind the forms and obtain signatures. NOTE: TAKE FIVE MINUTES BEFORE SIGNING THE FORMS TO REVIEW THE INFORMATION FOR ACCURACY. If Accounts Payable finds errors in a Travel Expense Reimbursement form, the package will not be processed and will be returned to the travelers Department Head for review. Preparer's Signature: Whoever completes the form for signature approvals must sign and date it. Signing the form acknowledges that the information submitted is accurate and in accordance with District policy as evidenced by the information provided by the traveling employee. Employee Signature: The person requesting reimbursement shall sign the form before submitting for approval. Signing the form acknowledges that the information submitted is accurate and in accordance with District policy. SECTION III — EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT APPROVAL SECTION Depending on the total of the incurred expenses, signatures are required per the Delegation of Authority Resolution, No. 99-23. After approvals are received, the Reimbursement package is submitted to: A. Training first, if the travel was required to attend a training session, or B. Accounts Payable if the travel was necessary to attend a meeting or conference. Reimbursement is usually received within two weeks. Revision Date: 120I00 Section III 22-6 SECTION III 22.1 ON-SITE TRAINING The Human Resources Employee Development Division handles the coordination of all on-site training except safety and compliance training. Safety and compliance training is coordinated through the Safety and Emergency Response Division. The mission statement of the Human Resources Employee Development Division is as follows: 7hmugh cost effective, well-coordinated training and development activities, the Employee Development Division provides peryormance improvement support and learning programs to meet individual, departmental and organizational goals." A. TRAINING CALENDAR A schedule of upcoming training Gasses is currently accessible through the District's Intranet webs@e. The Training Schedule lists all on-site training scheduled by the Human Resources and Employee Development Division based on training requirements and the approved budget for the fiscal year. This calendar provides managers and supervisors with information to assist in planning and scheduling training for the employees within their division(s) and employees with information regarding training classes for which they are scheduled. B. ENROLLMENT All District training is scheduled through the employee's Division Supervisor and/or Manager. Contact your Supervisor and/or Manager if you would like to enroll in training. C. CENTRALIZED RECORDKEEPING SYSTEM The Human Resources and Employee Development Division utilizes Training ServerTM, a database management system, to track District training information. Training ServerTM is a training records management system; however, it does much more than simply manage records. It provides a comprehensive link between employees present training records and their future training requirements. It allows training to be scheduled in advance, and detects various conflicts, such as individual schedules,training locations and training times. D. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM This program is designed to encourage self-development of District employees. It provides qualifying employees with tuition reimbursement for job-related educational courses at accredited colleges, universities, or other approved institutions. The program requires that such courses are primarily for the purpose of increasing capabilities in present positions, prepare employees for positions to which the employee could be reasonably expected to advance or update professional andlor technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District E. CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM The purpose of this program is to encourage employees to attain District approved certification that verify levels of competency. To meet this goal, the District will provide qualifying employees with financial reimbursement for the fees associated with acquiring and maintaining District approved technical and professional licenses, certifications and registrations. This policy is also designed to cover the certification/license expenses for employees who participate in voluntary certification Revision Date: 1120r00 Section III 22-1 programs either required or preferred by the Districts. F. COMPUTER BASED TRAINING(CBT) Computer-based software training is an interactive training tool that helps you learn a computer application right at your desktop PC. Information is delivered to your screen,questions are posed, and you receive feedback on your responses.You navigate your way through the training process in a graphically enhanced environment,and finish with an exam that measures how much you have retained.This training gives you flexibility, by letting you take each course at your own pace,at your own workstation, and at a time that is best for you. For computer based software training, the Education and Training Division utilizes a system called SkilfVantageTM Manager 2.3, a trademark of NETg. G. RESOURCES The Human Resources Employee Development Division has a library of various videos, books, audiotapes, magazines and periodicals that are available to District employees. Employees wishing to check out material should contact the staff of the Human Resources and Employee Development Division for assistance. Revision Date'. 120/00 Section III 22-2 -- Orange County Policy Number: D10.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: LEAVE-OF-ABSENCE WITH PAY Supersedes: April 22, 1998 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's leave-of-absence with pay program. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District's employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Vacation Leave. Except as otherwise provided,regular full-time employees accrue vacation leave, in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Hours-Biweekly Hours-Annually In years 0 through 1 3.08 80 In years 2 through 4 3.08 80 In years 5 through 10 4.62 120 In year 11 4.93 128 In year 12 5.24 136 In year 13 5.54 144 In year 14 5.85 152 In year 15 and over 6.16 160 4.1.1 Vacation leave begins to accrue after a new employee has completed six months of continuous service. After the first six months of service, the employee's account will be credited with 40 hours. After that time,the employee will accrue vacation hours consistent with the above chart.Vacation leave may only be utilized in increments of one-half hour or more. Vacation leave is accrued for all paid hours,including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status. A full-time, regular employee will be granted pro rate vacation leave credit during any pay period in which he/she is absent without pay for one(1)full working day. A part-time, regular employee will not be granted vacation leave credit during any period he/she is absent without pay on his/her regular working day. Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, it must be used prior to said December date,all other remaining hours in excess of 200 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. 4.2 Sick Leave. Sick leave is an insurance or protection provided by the District to be granted to employees in circumstances of adversity to promote the health and welfare of the individual employee. It is not an earned right to take time off from work. Sick leave is defined as the absence from duty of an employee because of a bona fide illness, injury, or pregnancy,or to attend to the Illness or injury of a family member as hereinafter defined. Temporary employees are not entitled to sick leave benefits. 4.2.1 Sick-Leave Accrual. Full-time employees hired prior to November 27, 1981,accrue paid sick leave at the rate of three and one-half(3.5)hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service(ninety-one(91)hours per year). Full-time employees hired on or after November 27, 1981. accrue paid sick leave at the rate of three(3.0) hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service(seventy-eight 178]hours per year),beginning with the first day of employment. 4.2.2 Sick-Leave Credit. A full-time, regular employee shall be granted pro rate sick-leave credit during any pay period in which he/she is absent without pay. A part-time, regular employee shall not be granted sick-leave credit during any period he/she is absent without pay on his/her regular working day. In the event an employee is required to work part-time by direction of histner physician,sick-leave credit shall be prorated,except that sick leave shall continue to accrue if an employee is absent due to an injury arising out of or in the course of his/her employment and is entitled to Workers'Compensation benefits. 4.2.3 Annual Payoff. Employees may elect annually to be paid for any unused sick leave hours accrued through the end of October at their current hourly rate according to the following payoff schedule or as specified in a Memoranda of Understanding. Accrued Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0-100 0% 101-240 25% 241-560 35% Over 560(mandatory) 50% 4.2.4 Sick Leave Incentive Plan. The Sick Leave Incentive Plan applies to Executive Management,Management,Supervisory and Professional and the Confidential Groups. The Plan will be administered on an Individual Group basis. If the average sick leave usage of employees in a Group is under 40 hours per year,calculated on annualized actual time off during the period from January 1 to December 31 exclusive of catastrophic illness or injury requiring absence in excess of 200 hours or industrial Injury leave in excess of 80 hours,the annual payoff for unused sick leave will be as follows: Accrued Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0-100 10% 101.240 40% 241-560 50% Over 560(mandatory) 60% 4.2.5 Employees who separate for any reason other than retirement or death shall be compensated for any accrued and unused sick leave according to the above schedule. Employees who retire or decease shall be paid at the fifty percent(50%) rate for all accrued and unused sick leave. 4.2.6 Permissible Uses. Sick leave may be applied only tewhen: a. The employee is physically or mentally unable to perform his or her normal functions due to illness, injury,or a medical condition. b. The absence is for the purpose of obtaining professional diagnosis Or treatment for a medical condition of the employee or the absence is due to medical and dental office appointments of an employee when approved by the employee's supervisor. c. The absence is for other medical reasons of the employee, such as pregnancy or obtaining a physical examination. d. The absence is for the care of the employee's parent,fathec,father-in-law, methec,-mother-in-law, brother, sister, husbagd,-,a spouse,child, step-child, grandchild,grandparent, legal guardian, or any family member with whom the employee resides. e. The absence is due to a job-related injury. f. In accordance with Labor Code Section 233,the absence is because the employee's presence is neededto attend to an illness of aparent(biological, foster or adoptive),step parent,legal guardian, spouse, child (biological,foster or adopted),step child, legal ward or a child of a person standing in loco parends, provided that no more than the amount of sick leave that would accrue to the employee during six(6)months at the employee's then current rate of accrual shall be.applicable.to this type of sick leave in each calendar year. 4.2.7 General Provisions. To qualify for sick-leave pay,the employee must notify the District at or in advance of the time the employee is scheduled to report for duty. Minimum charge to the employee's sick-leave account shall be one-half(.5)hour and thereafter in one-half(.5) hour increments. 4.2.8 4;h, D eGacaf Human Resources shall be responsible for control of abuse of the sick-leave privilege. If notified in advance by a manager or supervisor, the employee may be required, at any time, to furnish a certificate issued by a licensed physician or nurse,or other satisfactory evidence of illness; however,for absences of ten (10) consecutive working days or more, a request for leave and a medical statement, on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. Upon return to work,a written doctor's release must be submitted to Human Resources. For absences of one or more working days in an unpaid status, a request for leave and a medical statement,on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. 4.2.9 If the need for leave Is due to the employee's serious health condition,as defined in the Family and Medical Leave Act("FMLA")or the California Family Rights Act ("CFR4"),the certification requirement shall comply with provisions of these Acts. 4.3 Personal Leave. Personal leave is provided to allow employees time off with pay for vacation,personal business and non-job-related Illness or injury. Personal leave is accrued by full-0me employees for all paid hours,including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status,on a biweekly basis as follows: Personal Leave Hours Biweekly Annual Years of Service 0 through 1 2.31 80* 2 through 4 5.38 140 5 through 10 6.92 180 11 7.23 188 12 7.54 196 13 7.85 204 14 8.15 212 15 and over 8.46 220 *Only 60 hours may be taken in the first year,the 20 additional hours shall be credited to the accrual balance following successful completion of one year's service. 4.3.1 Scheduled Time Off. Management shall make a reasonable effort, considering the operational needs of the District,to accommodate all employee requests for time off. Scheduled time off should normally be requested at least two weeks in advance to increase the likelihood of Besse dates being approved. However, in the event unforeseen circumstances prevent such advance notification,employees may request scheduled time off with as little as one day's notice. Employees with at least one year's service must request at least 40 hours off each year. Preference among employees who request time off at least six months in advance shall be based on seniority. Requests received less than six months in advance shall be scheduled in the order received. Personal leave may only be reported in iasremeat"one-half- hour or m 0_n -:oprnn e 4?�•_"Unscheduled Time Off. Personal leave that is classified as unscheduled time off provides income protection to an employee who is unable to work due the following: e§! �loyee'Ws`'p"fi"ys� y rmenwaliy;un'ab7e: p hfs'wrh@rnorrrlal, functions tldeYo'j)Ilness"in'u �' rze medal conrlitlbnt b. Thabsen a rfo'r e`"`(r 'o`se` oufei'jn df nosfs�q�GeaLFrehN fora m�ilibal�pon dron;oKtfie Bmlilpyee`oath'elabsence is due to medical and dental office appointments of an employee when approved by the employee's supervisor. c. se,� ti-sffoidtfi'�1:medida'Tiraasons�yo e,erg mui _;pr.egnanyo�j _n �!p cal iih'�tlorca " d. a a same f for the care of the employee's fiar@01,-fafpeq father-in-law, mother'mother-in-law,brother,sister, hwsbo-d,-wife owe,child, s tld g grandparent, legal guardian,or any family member with whom the employee resides. e��� tlue to alob-related mlury. gmplo4ee,�sp�� Il`nerss�a{� na 6 b2oj` foot. fo�;fadp°� ssfe � ou�e� ii dd,,d ro r' � tec;on sb"alk I�pbt i ',erne; dh `5eh ar,�rl Unscheduled time off must be accounted for by filing ibm abo an Unscheduled Time Off Report ferm(seeattastaed)upon die" p'�oyge�return to work.,-axaoplihat G—Pleyes's total Employees maybe required to submit medical documentation of for their injury or illness. It is the responsibility of District's management to control the potential abuse of unscheduled time off privileges. Tardiness uadec fes _a'n115 minutes shall not be deducted from the employee's pay,but numerous occurrences will be addressed through the progressive discipline procedures.IWilin655 5f.o,g„ourlor gre, fialf ,�e?. ns d4`f�i3ia�nsdh�'dul mange# 4.3.3 An employee's attendance record shall be reviewed with an employee after five separate occurrences of unscheduled time off to provide an opportunity to assess problems that could potentially lead to disciplinary action. The accumulation of the sixth and seventh occurrence within a calendar year shall result in a verbal warning. The eighth occurrence shall result in a written warning. Employees who are charged with ten occurrences of absence within a twelve-month period shall be subject to termination. Absences of multiple consecutive days involving the same injury or illness shall be considered a single occurrence. The District also has the right to discipline employees on the basis of total absences away from work. Employees must notify their supervisor prior to the start time of their shift when they are unable to report for work. Employees returning from an extended leave should notify their supervisor as soon as possible to facilitate personnel scheduling. 4.3.4 33ieBkestec.et Human Resources shall be responsible for control of abuse of the unscheduled leave privilege. The employee may be required,at any time,to furnish a certificate issued by a licensed physician or nurse, or other satisfactory evidence of illness;however,for unscheduled absences of ten(10)consecutive working days or more,a request for leave and a medical statement,on prescribed forms, staling expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. Upon return to work, a written doctors release must be submitted to Human Resources. For absences of one or more working days in an unpaid status, a request for leave and a medical statement on prescribed forms, stating expected date of return must be submitted to Human Resources. 4.3.5 Personal Leave and Workers'Compensation Leave. Employees who are injured in the course of their employment are placed on Workers'Compensation Leave, and receive wage loss benefits to which they are entitled under the Workers' Compensation Act. Employees may request to receive prorated Personal Leave pay to supplement their Workers'Compensation payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay. 4.3.6 Personal Leave Payoff. Employees(or their estate)who separate, retire or die shall be paid in full at their current rate of pay for all Personal Leave hours accrued. 4.3.7 Maximum Accrual. Employees may only accrue up to 400 hours of Personal Leave as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. Employees may request to be paid in full for up to 40 such hours in excess of the 400 limit; any remaining time shall be scheduled off by the District. 4.3.8 Sick Leave Bank. Employees who elect to bank sick leave accrued prior to the implementation of Personal Leave provisions may elect to use such time off for absence due to illness or injury once 40 continuous hours of Personal Leave have been used. Employees who retire or die shall be paid at the 50 percent rate for all Banked Sick Leave hours; an employee who separates shall be compensated for Banked Sick Leave as follows. Banked Sick Leave Hours Rate of Payoff 0- 100 0 percent 101 -240 25 percent 241 -560 35 percent Over 560 50 percent 4.3.9 If the need for leave is due to the employee's serious health condition, as defined in the Family and Medical Leave Act CFMLA")or the California Family Rights Act CCFFW),the certification requirement shall comply with the provisions of these Acts. 4.4 Jury Duty Leave. Any full-time,including probationary,employee who is called for jury duty shall,upon request on prescribed forms approved by the-Birestecef Human Resources, be entitled to his/her regular pay for those hours of absence due to performance of the jury duty for a period up to twenty-two(22)working days,provided that his/her fees for such service,exclusive of mileage,are submitted to the District for deposit in the General Fund of the District. 4.4.1 Prior to jury duty service,each employee must complete the District's Leave-of- Absence Form and turn it in to Human Resources with a copy of the summons. To be entitled to receive regular pay for such jury leave,the f nployees,must report for work during their regularly scheduled work shift when they are relieved from jury duty service,unless there is less than one-half(Yz)of their regular shift remaining at the Employees are not compensated for jury duty occurring on scheduled days off. 4.4.2 An employee serving jury duty must obtain an attendance slip from the court to be submitted to Payroll with his/her time sheet in order to be eligible for regular pay for those hours of absence due to jury duty. 4.5 Witness Leave. Any full-time, including probationary,employee,who is required to be absent from work by a subpoena properly issued by a court, agency or commission legally empowered to subpoena witnesses,which subpoena compels his/her presence as a witness,except in a matter wherein he/she is named as a defendant or plaintiff or as an expert witness,shall, upon request on Leave-of-Absence Forms approved by Ohm Direatec ei Human Resources,be entitled to the time necessary to comply with such subpoena, provided any fees received for such service, exclusive of mileage,are submitted to the District for deposit in the General Fund of the District. 4.5.1 An employee so subpoenaed must submit a copy of the subpoena with his/her time sheet in order to be eligible for pay for such absence. To be entitled to receive regular pay for such witness leave,the employee must report for work at the District for time not actually retained on witness service of one(1)hour or more prior to and/or upon completion of each day's service,exclusive of travel time. 4.6 Military Leave. A request for military leave shall be made upon Leave-of-Absence Forms approved by ipe-9iresteFeE Human Resource and shall state the date when it is desired to begin the leave-of-absence and the date of anticipated return. A copy of the orders requiring such military service shall be submitted with the request. 4.6.1 Provisions of the Military and Veterans Code of the State of California, Sections 395- 395.5 shall govern military leave. In general,current law provides that an employee having one year or more service with a public entity is entitled to military leave with pay not exceeding thirty(30)days per year if the employee is engaged in military duty ordered for purposes of active military training or encampment. An employee who is required to attend scheduled service drill periods or perform other inactive duty reserve obligations is entitled to military leave without pay, not exceeding seventeen (17)calendar days per year, although the employee may, at his or her option, elect to use vacation or personal leave time to attend the scheduled reserve drill periods or to perform other inactive drill period obligations. Employees who participate in weekend military drill duty are not eligible for leave with pay for such activity,but may have their regular work schedule changed to accommodate the required time off. 4.7 Bereavement Leave. Using the prescribed forms,approved by the-Piwaiw a Human Resources,any full-time employee,whether probationary or regular, shall receive a maximum of three(3)days off with pay for the death or funeral of an immediate family member. Immediate family member is defined as the employee's father,father-in-law, mother, mother-in-law, brother,sister, husband,wife, child, step-child,g_g'I'arenP, grandchild,grandparent, legal guardian,or any family member with whom the employee resides br'gx�ig7s.Trl'en ;m eLee:9,W naum_ gun„dff"FsY"s;ndl F(OTIf,' 5.0 PROCEDURE 6.0 EXCEPTIONS Section 4.1,Vacation, including Subsections 4.11 and 4.12,of this policy does not apply to employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance (Including General Services Administration employees)Memorandum of Understanding. Section 4.2, Sick Leave, including Subsections 4.21 through 4.28, of this policy does not apply to employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance(including General Services Administration employees)Memorandum of Understanding. Section 4.3, Personal Leave, including Subsections 4.31 through 4.39, of this policy applies only to those employees covered under the provisions of Personal Leave in the Operations and Maintenance(including General Services Administration employees)Memorandum of Understanding. Vacation leave is not accrued for overtime hours worked. Accrued balances of vacation leave,compensatory leave, and personal leave may be cashed out at the employee's request on an annual basis in December of each calendar year. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours of vacation as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. 7.2 In the event an employee accrues vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, it must be used prior to the December date, all other remaining hours in excess of 200 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. 7.3 Employees are not eligible to schedule vacation leave until the completion of six months continuous service. 7.4 Employees may not maintain a negative balance on vacation, sick, compensatory, or personal leave accruals. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Operations and Maintenance MOU 8.2 Administrative and Clerical MOU 8.3 Engineering MOU 8.4 Technical Services MOU 8.5 Supervisory and Professional MOU 8.6 Personal Leave Unscheduled Time Off Report Form Orange County Policy Number: D20.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: LEAVE-OF-ABSENCE Supersedes: October 22, 1997 WITHOUT PAY Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's leave-of-absence without pay program. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District's employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the policy of the District to grant employees extended leaveof-absences under certain circumstances. Except as stated below,employees shall not receive compensation during an extended leave-of-absence. 4.1.1 Family and Medical Leave Act and California Family Rights Act Leave. Using the prescribed farms, approved by i;a Wastecaf Human Resources, any full-time,including probationary,or part-time employee with at least fifty-two(52)weeks of service and at least one thousand two hundred fifty(1,250)hours of service,may be granted an FMLA or CFRA leave-of-absence without pay,not to exceed twelve(12)weeks in a twelve(12)month calendar period. A request for leave-of-absence without pay must be made upon prescribed forms in all instances where an employee is absent without pay for more than five(5)consecutive working days,or for absences of ten(10)consecutive working days or more when using paid sick leave accruals. 01 Substitutlon of Paid Leave. Employees who request FMLA or CFRA leave for qualifying purposes other than the employee's own"serious health condition"shall be required to use all vacation and other leave accruals,except sick leave accruals,before unpaid leave is granted. Vacation,personal leave and sick leave credit shall not accrue during any pay period that an employee Is absent without pay for more than one day.EiiT ,S . su s� fe"3ieTc�Iraire,.wintfiDs —0 va'1', d such leave., �ppursuani%to seekoni4.26 ennrsst¢fe.Via of Policy;�Q1A'60`� e_of"A£seneaytdh Pay; 40;- "�... iu.�ny"9A-9�ex,..,,i.....,..... y be Page 1 Ira � ,w d9i�Fl{ei9� 8 *lop aP Fg gFQPdn...Qn, legal n...... lap GF apy family 9 � 4.2 Permissible Uses. The following are FMLA and CFRA leave permissible uses: 4.2.1 FMLA Leave. Unpaid FMLA leave may be used for 1)child care following the birth or placement of a child,2)the care of a paw, Sather* father-in-law,-w,o#w ,*,-mother-in-law,brother, sister,pusb2md, wife, child, step-child,grandchild,grandparent, legal guardian,or any family member with whom the employee resides who has a"serious health condition,as defined in the Act or 3)for the employee's own "serious health condition"that renders the employee unable to perform the essential functions of his or her position,including incapacity due to pregnancy. 4.2.2 CFRA Leave. Unpaid CFRA leave may be used for the same purposes as FMLA Leave,and shall run concurrently except that an employee's incapacity due to pregnancy is not eligible for CFRA leave. However, such incapacity may entitle an employee to up to four(4)months of pregnancy disability leave,with medical approval, plus another twelve (12)weeks of FMLA leave,to care for the child, in a twelve(12)month period. 4.3 General Provisions. The following general provisions shall apply: 4.3.1 Requests for FMLA and CFRA Leave. Where the need for leave is foreseeable,the District requests thirty(30)days advance notice. 4.3.2 Medical Certification.As a condition of FMLA or CFRA leave because of a"serious health condition,'the District may require certification by a health care provider, 4.3.3 Medical and Dental Premiums. During FMLA and CFRA leave,the District shall pay for medical and dental benefits at the same level as coverage would have been provided if the employee was not on leave. The employee shall be required to pay his or her share of medical and dental premiums. 4.3.4 Reinstatement. Upon expiration of FMLA or CFRA leave, the employee shall be reinstated to the same or a comparable position unless the employee would not otherwise have been entitled to that position for reasons unrelated to such leave(e.g., lay-offs), in which case the Districts obligation to continue health and dental or other benefits shall cease. Page 2 4.3.5 Failure to Return to Work. If, upon the expiration of FMLA or CFRA Leave, or any District-approved extension thereof,an employee fails to return to work,the employee shall be considered to have automatically resigned from his/her position. The District shall review vacancies to determine whether or not a vacant position exists that the employee is qualified to perform with or without reasonable accommodation. If the employee is still unable to perform the essential duties of his/her position,the employee shall be considered to have automatically resigned from his/her position, unless eligible for disability retirement. 4.3.6 Bridge of Service. If an employee automatically resigns from his/her position as a result of a'bona-fide"injury or illness,and then is rehired to a position within the District within one year,the District shall bridge the employees'service date. "Bridging of service"means adding the total number of days away from work to the employees'original date of hire. 44 Married Employees. Employees of the District wFia"-aie married to each other shall be limited to a corn i total of twelve(12)weeks FMLA or CFRA Leave in a twelve(12)month calendar period #wcow faparaat ew p ssgn ors, u ter p o ear o� .�d� r" LL`Z`for`Ieca-men a+s,o�roed"a a ,ipjo�y'- 'rXadggtiombrafof`sFrg COrB 8y'f06fh �ll lace (3) carefo%the emp of ye8'!rent _�a gV5-n3"'f�, Wfi ,fhe--"fiii's6'ana"'7r e. o eauk�p o'nof°9»'tfe -.FMI�`Teave �rn�;�u-- enUtiementfordneeoE e5atiov`�pugrosest�i and oultlCrl epeuedtolihe`fer eRn � e�yr` he�mo"d a AaC 'd�'maaa i`�..-. and"12wee`"7isfo7zEML�Y�aveka' "tftose`su m'r'�1@''"t�wonenou li'eaffii'ibn$iGom 4.5 siz-MeWk Limit on Uap"Leavesof-Absence. of Authorized leaveof-absences,whether paid or unpaid, exceed six(6) months in a twenty-four(24)month period, unless required by the FMLA, CFRA or other law. 4.6 General Leave. Subject to Section 4.5,"SW Mealk Limit on Uapaid Leaves of Absence,"employees may be granted a general leave-of-absence to attend to personal matters,or for FMLA or CFRA qualifying events,after the expirations of previously authorized leave, if the-0irestec of Human Resources determines that an extended period of time away from the job shall be in the best interests of the employee and the District. 4.6.1 During a general leave-of-absence,the employee shall be required to pay both the District's and the employee's share of medical and dental premiums. 4.7 Return to Work Policy for Non-Work-Related Leave. An employee who has been absent from work due to a medical,non-work-related reason shall be subject to a Retum-to-Work medical evaluation. 4.7.1 If it is determined that the job demands of the position last held by the employee are not compatible with the employee's restrictions(with reasonable accommodation if the employee is disabled within the Page 3 meaning of the ADA)and the employee is willing to return to work, placement in an alternative position,if available,shall be considered. The employee shall be re-classified as"medically disqualified"while alternative positions are being considered. Such time off shall be without pay; however,the employee may elect to use accrued leave hours, such as vacation,sick or personal,to receive compensation. Placement of an employee in an alternative position requires a pre-placement medical evaluation for the alternative job. 4.7.2 If it is determined that the job demands of the position last held by the employee are not compatible with the employee's restrictions(and cannot be reasonably accommodated if the employee is disabled within the meaning of American with Disabilities Act)and there is not an alternative position,or the employee's restrictions are not compatible with an alternative position,or the employee is not willing to return to work,the employee shall be re-classed as"medically disqualified"and not permitted to work. Thereafter,the employee shall be retired for disability,if eligible,or dismissed. Such dismissal shall not constitute disciplinary action for cause. If requested,the employee's file will indicate the employee left for personal reasons. 4.8 Compliance with Law. These Leave-of-Absence provisions shall be interpreted and applied in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of FIALA,CFRA, ADA and all other laws. In the event there is a direct conflict between these provisions,as written or applied,the provisions of law shall govern. 5.0 PROCEDURE 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Operations and Maintenance MOU 8.2 Administrative and Clericel MOU 8.3 Engineering MOU 8.4 Technical Services MOU 8.5 Supervisory and Professional MOU 86- --ltc' 6.fDM-M°e BgeriiT.e'w"idiPWj Page 4 Orange County Policy Number: D30.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: HOLIDAYS Supersedes: May 13, 1998 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for holidays. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all current employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4A It is the District's policy to grant employees 12 paid holidays per year in accordance with this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Full-time employees shall receive holiday pay g their entire scheduled work shift immediately preceding and following the holiday is in a paid payroll status.When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday, the employee shall be paid at the employee's regular rate of pay for the holiday or receive an equivalent amount of holiday compensatory time off, and shall also receive overtime pay at the rate of one-and-one-haH times their regular hourly rate for all hours actually worked. 5.2 Holiday pay for part-time employees is based on a nine(9) hour workday. It is paid on the following prorated basis: NORMALLY SCHEDULED HOURS OF WORK PERCENT BENEFIT/SuesIDY PER WEEK 0—under 19 None 20—under.29 50%• 4. hours 30-39 75%- 6.75 hours 5.3 When a holiday occurs on an employee's regularly scheduled day off,the employee will accrue compensatory time off for those hours. In no case may an employee accumulate more than 50 hours holiday compensatory time off. 5.4 The days listed below are observed by the District as holidays for 2000,2001 and 2002. SCHEDULE A HOLIDAY 2000 2001 2002 New Years Day Fffdo ,a emti 41 w ay,Januwyl nrs&Y;aanuery4 Linco rl's Birthday Fed".February ll M.fty.FOn ary 12 Tuesdty,Feb 12 President's Day MOMtl Y,Februayz Manft.Rarvaryla MWNay,fehn 18 Memorial Day M.dW,M:yU Mond",MayU MufdWMay2/ Independence Day Tuestlay JWy4 Wetlna.tlny.JWY4 TMnft,JWy4 Labor Day MW Y,Sepff e 4 Montlay,S:premwr a MOntlry,Smp%Mn 2 Veteran's Day FIft Novemn.rl0 Mon&y,Nov b:r 12 Meijdry;pe7iortir ll Thanksgiving Day Thmft.MovamwrM rnnr.my.N..emwr 2a Tnuretlay,INo.emnrM Day after Thanksgiving Nft woWmw u FftW.Mowmn.rao FrM:y,Newme.i22 Day before Christmas M.WDa:aii M raver.oewmnaru Tw9dW:Dkw6wU Christmas Day Tt.sa.naeeannerm TrNatlry.oGunwars vretlrmeay,OeoeM'Da26 Floating Holiday •• •• SCHEDULE 8 HOLIDAY 2000 2001 2002 New Years Day s: W"."e I MonetY.J.nuuyl T.atlay,aMr:®y1 Lincoln's Birthday sYaNgJPebu 12 Monday.February 12 TuGWW.F.nn®ry12 Presidents Day M.ndW,FebrrwrY21 Monfty,Febhn 19 w fty,FWa Yls Memprlal Day Monday.My M Montlay,May 2a Montlay;M"V Independence Day Tupday,3Wy4 Wadn.atl",JWY4 ThurSft ory4 Labor Day Meatl W,: pwmna4 Nandy.aeptemwra MaMay,Septimher2 Veteran's Day s:mMaY,NWmnwrlt Sun&Y.Noyomwrll MWft Nowinbrll Thanksgiving Day ThWetlay,Navanwr2l Tliuntlay,Ne.emwr2a Thuntlq.Xayw= Day after Thanksgiving FMd.Y.Noyemwr24 FMay.Noy.mN Firry.No4einwr22 Day before Christmas eMNwy ak."we24 wood", oao WU Tuesft D"Gvm 24 Christmas Day M.Nwr,oec®nwr25 Tueadq.Okw Wz W:tlre9day,Useslnwr2S Floating Holiday •• •• Employees may elect one day during each year as a"Floating Holiday'. The"Floating Holiday"must be used within the year it is accrued. Every effort shall be made to grant an employee's request for a"Floating Holiday'off providing an employee gives sufficient notice to their supervisor. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Whan an employee is on medical or pregnancy leave, holidays will be paid only during disability waiting period I employee is in a continuous paid status. All other holidays that occur outside the waiting period will not be paid,regardless if employee is in paid status or not. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 If a regularly scheduled holiday occurs on a Saturday,the previous Friday shall be taken off as the"holiday'for pay purposes. If a regularly scheduled holiday occurs on a Sunday,then the following Monday shall be taken off as the"holiday' for pay purposes. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Orange County Policy Number: D40.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: CONFERRAUDONATION Supersedes: October 22, 1997 OF LEAVE Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the Districts=conferral of leave program. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All Districts=employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Employees may on occasion face catastrophic medical conditions involving either themselves or their immediate family that result in their exhausting all of their accrued sick,vacation, personal or other paid leave. Such employees may request,or be nominated for,conferral of certain fortes of paid leave by other employees. 4.2 Employees may,on a eae-time case-by-case basis and in accordance with the provisions of the DistricW's policy regarding Conferral of Paid Leave,elect to donate accrued and unused Personal Leave,Vacation Leave or Compensatory Time Off to an individual employee who has depleted his or her own paid leave as a direct result of a catastrophic medical condition. 4.3 All donations shall be volunteered on a form provided by the Director of Human Resources. Employees may donate vacation,compensatory or personal leave time to the eligible employee. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Upon receipt of a request or nomination for donation of paid leave, the Director of Human Resources shall request approval by the General Manager to implement the provisions of the Conferral of Leave Policy. 5.2 Upon such approval, all employees shall be notified of the program. Page 1 5.3 The vacation,compensatory or personal leave time donated to an employee shall be converted to a dollar value based on the hourly rate of the donor. 5.4 Those dollars shall then be converted into sick leave at the hourly rate of the recipient of the donation,and added to their account. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Employees who have not exhausted their paid leave-vacation, sick, personal and compensatory time off-are not eligible to participate in the Conferral of Leave Program. 6.2 6.3 Sick leave may not be donated by one employee to another. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 To be eligible to participate in the Donation of Leave Program,employees must have exhausted all of their paid leave, including vacation,sick,personal and compensatory time off. 7.2 Employees may be requested to provide medical documentation of a catastrophic health condition involving their child,parent or spouse,or involving the employee's own catastrophic health condition. 7.3 All such time must be conferred on a form provided by the Director of Human Resources. 7.4 Donations must be made in whole hour increments,and are irrevocable. 7.4.1 Any such hours that remain at the conclusion of the leave period shall remain available for the use of the recipient and shall be treated as regularly accrued sick leave. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Donation of Leave Donation Form, Page 2 Orange County Policy Number: D60.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: BENEFITS OPTION PLAN Supersedes: October 27, 1999 (BOP) Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for administering the Benefits Option Plans (BOP). 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management Groups. 3.0 DEFINITIONS The Benefits Option Plan is a provision in the District's policies that provides employees in the Professional, Supervisory,Management and Executive Management groups with supplemental income that can be used for a variety of purposes as specified herein. k e 'bursemenfperiodi'� e'so xt--thi s''crwe ;. elmmn niwtir e Bo,"ar WMPCPAVTA 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to allow employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups to participate in the BOP in accordance with this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management group who have successfully completed their probationary period are entitled to participate in the BOP p m wp a n q 1 WV*n—IEn _ gi � °°_ .Under the provisions of the BOP, Professional employees will receive$1,000 annually, and Supervisors, Management and Executive Management employees will receive$1250 annually to offset the cost of professional licenses, memberships, subscriptions, tuition reimbursement and medical expenses. The Benefits Option Plan will be distributed semi-annually in January and July of each year. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Employees who are within their initial six-month probationary period are not eligible for BOP. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Orange County Policy Number: D100.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: T4GWNlCALAND Supersedes: November 17, 1999 &F..c1ssRAzwa-AND CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this program is to encourage employees to broaden and further develop their job skills. To meet this goal, the District will provide qualifying employees with financial reimbursement for the fees associated with acquiring and maintaining District-approved city,county, state and federal technical and professional licenses, certifications and registrations. This policy is also designed to cover the certification/license expenses for employees who participate in voluntary certification programs either required or preferred by the District for the purpose of. 1.1.1 Increasing capabilities in their present positions within the District. 1.1.2 Updating professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District'regular, full-time employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualifying Employees: regular, full-time employees who have completed their initial probationary period. 3.2 Regular Full-time Employees: employees who regularly work an 80-hour, biweekly,full benefit pay period. 3.3 Certification Reimbursement: a program of eligible expense reimbursement for qualifying employees who acquire and maintain District-approved city, county, state and federal technical and professional licenses, certifications and registrations on their own time. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District will reimburse employees who successfully complete approved required or preferred licenses, certification and/or registration requirements in Page 1 of 3 compliance with section 1.0 PURPOSE, that are in an effort to increase technical proficiency or promote cross-training for other positions approved by the General Manager. 5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Employees who need training to prepare for a license, certification, registration or examination, required as a condition of employment, is considered job-essential and will normally be covered through regular training procedures. 5.2 Employees who pursue training to prepare for license, certification or registration solely for the purpose of advancement or access to promotional opportunities can be reimbursed under the Tuition Assistance Program as part of career development. 5.3 Organization and Association Membership Fees are not eligible for reimbursement. 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Pre-Approval Process 6.1.1 Prior to applying for an original License, Registration or Certification, the Human Resources and Employee Development Division must receive a LICENSE, REGISTRATION or CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT PRE-APPROVAL APPLICATION form from the employee, with sections 1, 2 and 3(manager's review and pre-approval) completed. 6.1.1.1 For a renewal or upgrade of a license, registration or certification, omit Section 6.1.1 of the Pre Approval Process and proceed to Section 6.2.1 of the Reimbursement Process. 6.1.2 The Human Resources and Employee Development Division Manager will review the application for approval. 6.1.2.1 Upon approval,the application will be signed and a copy will be forwarded back to the employee with a LICENSE, REGISTRATION or CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATION torte. 6.1.2.2. Upon non-approval, the application will be forwarded back to the employee with a status form indicating the reason(s)for non-approval. 6.1.2.2.1 Non-approved applications that are incomplete must be corrected and returned to the Human Resources and Employee Development Division by the date indicated on the status form. Page 2 of 3 6.2 Reimbursement Process 6.2.1 Within 60 calendar days of obtaining License, registration or certification, the employee will submit the LICENSE, REGISTRATION or CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATION form,with Section 1 completed,to the Human Resources and Employee Development Division with the following documents attached: 6.2.1.1 Proof of payment, such as: copy of both sides of cancelled checks or copy of monthly credit card statement(blackout non applicable transactions) NOTE: a photocopy of the front side of a personal check does not qualify as valid proof. 6.2.1.2 Printout of fees paid from issuing body 6.2.1.3 Proof of license, registration or certification i.e. photocopy of certificate,card or license 6.2.1A Official transcript or photocopy of final grade(for original certification, hoensure or registration) 6.2.2 The Human Resources and Employee Development Division Manager will review the LICENSE, REGISTRATION or CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATION form for approval. 6.2.2.1 Upon approval,the Human Resources and Employee Development Division Manager will sign the application and forward it to the Accounting Division and a copy indicating their reimbursement status will be sent to the employee. 6.2.2.2 Upon non-approval, a copy of the application will be forwarded back to the employee with a status form indicating the reason(s)for non-approval. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.1 Because they are provided compensation under the Districts Benefits Option Plan to pay for their certifications, licenses or registrations, employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management Groups are ineligible for participation in this program. 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee meets the criteria specified in this policy. Page 3 of 3 Orange County Policy Number: E60.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: INTERNET USAGE Supersedes: October 22, 1997 Approved by: 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 To establish uniform guidelines for Internet usage. 1.2 The District makes every effort to provide its employees with technology-based resources in order to conduct official business more effectively. In this regard,the District has installed personal computers, local area networks(LANs), electronic mail (e-mail)and access to the Internet. 2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This policy statement applies to all District employees, senimelem and GORGUMPAS. Additionally, all personnel who perform any services for the bistnct and Wo-%1ve.�aecess to the Internet, regardless of their employment status,are covered by this policy; 3.0 DEFINITIONS Attachment: An application specific file,such as a Word or Excel document that is transported with an e-mail message. The recipient must have suitable software for viewing the attachment. E-mail: A message, possibly with attachments,composed on a computer and received by a computer. A network, potentially including the Internet, is the transmission medium. Internet: A worldwide network of computers,adhering to universal standards that are capable of exchanging data with each other. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 DepaFtmem Heads must a ill;AOpe Internet ---e GORReat an a initiated by ill ng out an 4.6 Relevant, e)#+6t+R@ P SIFIGIpol ses apply te Intemet usage. In part Gula;;. 4,5.4 kVPmPt researses shall Set be-usod-to-14WR GFdlssemiRate any sexually Page 1 of 3 ffevided by they !he District unless you are-AhAF-Ad to do As. 4.1 Access to the Internet is designed to facilitate communication among-users aodbhe . business associates for Information,messages,or memoranda. Access tothis resource'ie provided to facilitate communication with other govemmentantitfes,companles;'and individuals for the benefit of the District. 4.2 Internet access is intended primarily for District business. The system is nbit-i-o be iik r personal gain or to support or advocate non-District-related business or pumCses= 4'F to and other electronic messages within this system are the property of the Da computer systems are not completely secure,the Internet is not imendedibi afi srp sensitise material. Public agency transmittals are found to be public record and maybestS toabe right-to-know laws, depending upon their content. 4.3 The Districts Information Technology Department purchases,owns,and administers the necessary software and licenses to provide accessto Intemet services. Users.may.be held responsible for any damages caused by unauthorized software or viruses they Introduce into the system. 4.4 Management reserves the right to monitor and access all IntemetUlesrcreated sMced i received on all District systems,at any time,with no pnor notioet iThereflsrNQ` acladofrj of personal privacy in the use of the Internet The District mayirevLevrthegprnetlts ofsp transmitted communications over its systems at any time. 4.5 The District is not tresponsible for items originating from the Internet: 4.6 The District reserves the right to restrict employee access to the Internet or to certain Internet content. 4.7 Prohibited Uses 4.7.1 Internet resources shall not be used to obtain or disseminate any sesually oriented material, images or massages: 4.7.2 The use of the Internet to send threatening,slanderous,racially angler§ekually, harassing messages is prohibited. 4.7.3 The use of Internet resources for personal gain,solicitation of commercial ventures,religious or pDlitical.causes,or other non-job-related sol,Wde ions is prohibited. 4.7.4 Copyrighted software shall not be downloaded unless it is,a"demo`pao0ge provided by the vendor and must be scanned for viruses. 4.7.5 Unencrypted,confidential documents must never beseht via sae Inginet 4.7.6 Any other use that may compromise the integrityof the Dt*triot and ifs business.:in any way is strictly prohibited. Page 2 of 3 4.7.7 When using the Internet, remember that each employee represaitte(the piety Do not speak for the Disidct unless you.are authorized to'dos% SM PROCEDURES 5.1 Intemet-Messages The Internet provides the District with significant accessand dissemina8bb 4111.onal4orno_ _ individuals outside of the District. Like all e-mail messages, Internet messagesiare eroo being forwarded without the express permission of the original author. Users rpust caution in the transmission and dissemination of messages outside of the District;arrrl}jttQ comply with all state and federal laws. 5.2 Signature Block All correspondence using the Internet system should include asignature block afthe endpl all transmitted messages. This usually consists of the sender's name,trtle,land,compary name,direct telephone number,fax number,and e-mail address. 6.0 ENFORCEMENT 6.1 A violation of standards,procedures or guidelines established pursuant to this policy shall be presented to the District's Management for appropriate action and may result In disciplinary action including termination. If,based on the District's audit and review of an employee's Internet usage, the District has reason to believe that an employee's use of the Internet violates the law in any manner,the District may refer to matter to the proper authorities for prosecution. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8-1 This POGY Wall We FOYiswed by each empleyes and hieffie;Immediate supewisw pOeF Is the 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 9.1 E-mail Usage Policy E70.00 Page 3 of 3 Orange County Policy Number: E70.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: E-mail Usage Supersedes: November 4, 1999 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To establish uniform guidelines for electronic mail usage. 1.2 This administrative regulation sets forth the Districts policy with regard to access to and disclosure of electronic mail messages sent or received by District employees with the use of the Districts electronic mail system. It also sets forth policies and procedures on the proper use of the electronic mail system provided by the District. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District employees. Additionally,all personnel who perform any services for the District and who have access to the network,regardless of their employment status,are covered by this policy. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Attachment: An application specific file, such as a Word or Excel document,which is transported with an e-mail message. The recipient must have suitable software for viewing the attachment. E-mail: A message, possibly with attachments,composed on a computer and received by a computer. A network, potentially including the Internet, is the transmission medium. Internet: A worldwide network of computers,adhering to universal standards that are capable of exchanging data with each other. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District's electronic mail system(e-mall)is designed to facilitate communication among users and other business associates for messages or memoranda. Access to these resources is provided to facilitate communication with each other,other government entities, companies,and individuals for the benefit of the District. 4.2 The e-mail system is District property and intended for District business. The system is not to be used for personal gain or to support or advocate non-District-related business or purposes. All data and other electronic messages within this system are the property of the District. Since computer systems are not completely secure,the e-mail system is not intended to transmit sensitive material. 4.3 Employees should be aware that all records,whether on paper or computerized,are subject to the mandatory public disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act, subject to the exceptions provided under the Act. 4.4 The District's Information Technology Department purchases,and administers the necessary software and licenses to provide access to e-mail and Internet services. Users may not rent, copy or loan the software or its documentation, nor provide Page 1 alternative software to access the system. Users may be held responsible for any damages caused by unauthorized software or viruses they Introduce Into the system. Department Heads are responsible for the implementation and adherence of this policy within their departments. 4.5 Management reserves the right to monitor and access all e-mail accounts and e-mail messages that are created, transmitted or received on District systems,at any time, with no prior notice. There is NO expectation of personal privacy in the use of the e- mail system. The District may review the contents of all transmitted communication over its electronic systems at any time. 5.0 PROCEDURES 5.1 Passwords Users will define their own confidential password, but should be aware that this does not mean that the system is for personal confidential communication, nor does it suggest that e-mail is the property of the user. To ensure the security of the e-mail system, the system will prompt the user to change their password every six months and requires that passwords contain a minimum of 10 characters. The system will not let the user reuse their last 24 passwords. Should the user forget their password and attempt to input a password they are not sure of,the system will lock them out after three failed attempts. Users should not share their passwords with anyone else. 5.2 Internet Messages The Internet provides the District with significant access and dissemination of information to individuals outside of the District. Like all e-mail messages,Internet messages are capable of being forwarded without the express permission of the original author. Users must use caution in the transmission and dissemination of messages outside of the District,and must comply with all stale and federal laws. 5.3 Signature Block E-mail should Include a signature block at the end of all transmitted messages. This usually consists of the sander's name, titre,company name,direct telephone number, fax number and email address. 5.4 Prohibited Uses E-mail messages should be sent with appropriateness and good judgement at all times. The following are examples of e-mail uses that are prohibited: 5.4.1 Communication that in any way may be construed as disruptive, offensive, abusive or threatening; 5A.2 Communication of sexually explicit Images or messages; 5.4.3 Communications that contain ethnic slurs,racial epithets or anything that may be construed as harassment of others based on race,color, national origin, sex,age,disability or religious beliefs. 5A.4 Solicitation of commercial ventures, religious or political causes,outside organizations, chain-letters or other non-jab-related solicitations;and 5.4.5 Any other use that may compromise the integrity of the District and its business in any way. Page 2 5.5 Electronic Mail Is Not Archived And Shall Not Be Used As A Permanent Storage Medium 5.5.1 Electronic mail Is not backed-up on a permanent basis. The District stores electronic mail only to the degree that allows the District to restore current electronic mail in the event of a systems failure. 5.5.2 Electronic mail is not a permanent storage medium and staff is expressly forbidden to use it as such. Electronic mail in-trays and out-treys shall be purged on a regular basis,and upon implementation of the appropriate technology, the District may, in its discretion, purge any such mail on an automatic basis. 5.5.3 If employees wish to maintain any electronic mail as a permanent record,they must save the electronic mail as a disk file or print it out in hard copy form for permanent filing. The Information Technology Department recommends that users exit Outlook and log off the computer every evening and reboot at least once a week. DO NOT shut down the computer. To ensure that deleted messages are not automatically backed up: • Before leaving each evening, right-click on the"Deleted Items"icon and select"Empty 'Deleted Items'Folder"or, • Configure Outlook,upon exit,to automatically delete the deleted Items. Select Tools, Options,Other and click on the"Empty the Deleted Items Folder Upon Exiting"checkbox. 6.6 "Everyone"E-mails The primary purpose of sending"Everyone"e-mail is to communicate District-wide related Information. This Information should be of a high-priority nature and pertain to all users. This information can be routed to all users utilizing the"Everyone"e-mail distribution list that has been created in Outlook. Contact the Communications Department if clarification is required prior to sending an "Everyone"e-mail. To send a non-District-related message to"everyone",such as items for sale,discussion items,etc.,a"Bulletin Board"folder has been created in Outlook, located in the Public Folders section. The following guidelines should apply when sending this type of e-mail: • User's name is recorded on the posting • The time of day is recorded. • User is responsible for using District's time and facilities prudently These e-mail messages are similar to printed communication and the user should exercise good judgement when utilizing the e-mail system. If further clarification is required prior to sending an "Everyone"e-mail, please contact the Communications Department. 6.0 ENFORCEMENT 6.1 A violation of standards,procedures, or guidelines established pursuant to this policy shall be presented to District's Management for appropriate action and may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. If, based on the Districts audit and review of user's e-mail and Internet usage,the District has reason to believe that the user has violated the law in any manner,the District may refer this matter to the proper authorities for prosecution. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS Page 3 b a6ed 00 093 ON A0110d a6esn lauaiul l 6 1N3vynoou 031V13H 06 SNOLLIONOO ONV SNOISIAO2ld 0'a Orange County Policy Number: F20.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: HOURS OF WORK— Supersedes: December 9, 1998 NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's work hours. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District non-exempt employees in all organizational units and departments unless otherwise specified. 3.0 DEFINITIONS The Day Shift is an assigned work shift of at least seven consecutive hours between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The Night Shift is an assigned work shift of at least seven consecutive hours between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Flextime is the option of employees to choose the starting and finishing times of their shift,with supervisory pre�a­ppmval. Overtime is the number of hours in paid status in excess of 40 during a workweek unless-assigned-teas Nonexempt Employees are employees who are covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended. Such employees, because of the type of work that they perform and their earnings level,are subject to receiving overtime pay in addition to any entitlement otherwise provided for in applicable Memoranda of Understanding or other policies. Core Hours are the hours between 8:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.on any given day. Payday is the Wednesday before the end of the subsequent pay period. Pay Periods tlecur . nor- a .. om e• asi6' i""s "-ri-ourswo_r r,^O;_. Workweek �rsCay meaner�0-�ioSrs ofwo pert`cl^"r��fiourpenod�w��ee�s:TFe iyo}ke4eek rs a fixed anl: iecumng,penodrof]fib!hours-,grmeven.00na�,cu'Uve24hoyrp'anode}Ui$trletfem�layeeiworkweeKs are strubutreClon,�n,�ndmdual and(or�aroUp basis�hati40-hdtus oYwork regularl,�oceurs#durmgihefiiCerTari_A' regularlyrrec"urrmg period o{Yfitl`#tours`J�eispeafibFwo[�;vreek'foaea�em�(oyse IsfiKad by the General Mi,�arjer;�; 1�a,¢r rtee aitC.smai meE�q�Nte±gccarnting 'Ifbifice.; Page 1 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the policy of the District to establish the time and duration of working hours as required by work load,operations flow, customer service needs,the efficient management of human resources,and any applicable law. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Normal Business Hours. Administrative and business functions are normally performed between the hours of 7:30 a.m.and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday,and between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.on Friday. However, the District allows flextime for employees to choose their starting and finishing times as long as employees whose jabs involve contact with the public or outside organizations are present between the core hours of 8:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m. In addition,department heads may deny flextime to certain employees for reasons of business necessity,work flow,or customer service needs. 5.2 Core Hours. Individual divisions may schedule work beyond the core hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., subject to approval by the department head, to meet specific operating or service requirements in the most cost-effective and efficient manner. Actual starting and ending times of an employee's shift may vary depending on the operational requirements of each department. 5.3 Shift Schedules. each wool, (11(89 Agh-dwis) ac'Co`un$ligpptirposesjr8res �o�I �ma �@sasa4,Osto du paTq�n,a)��;'�ayrolr�st�oti;e�ihdb n e tbral}wo�ipenods � ch shdTr,&:Tour&RtouJ�+days nawe4lo hviwkweek, 5v/80�a;. "esFfiodr` aystea"c�� Nrorkv ee1���0/80)�au�1,6hour'da�sfeach+�"vo 8�8'0)�aihree� e a d one'y o71i dey�+.�'f��� The slarling_andending��" me'tv�"uu ovaesa'a«+2Y�f�' y@ry� Day shifts typically begin between 5:00 a.m.and 8:00 a.m. 5.4 Overtime. Supervisors may schedule overtime or extra shifts as necessary. Supervisors will assign overtime to nonexempt employees in the particular job for which overtime is required. Non-exempt employees are not permitted to work overtime without the prior written or verbal approval of their supervisor,division manager,or department head. 5.5 Meeting Attendance. Employee attendance at lectures, meetings, and training programs will be considered as part of an employee's work hours if attendance is requested by management. Overtime or compensatory time may be allowed for such attendance only in unusual circumstances and must be approved by the department head in advance of the meeting. 5.6 Make-up Time. Al their discretion,supervisors may allow nonexempt employees to make-up lost time during a given workweek. However, make-up time may not be allowed if the lost time results from conditions the employee could control, if there is no work the employee is qualified to do,or if adequate supervision is not available. 5.7 Time Sheets-Nonexempt Employees. All employees are required to complete an individual lime record, hereinafter referred to as a"time sheet"showing the daily hours worked. The following points should be considered by employees in filling out time sheets: 5.7.1 Employees should record their total hours worked for each workday on their time sheets and sign their own time sheets at the and of the pay period. 5.7.2 Employees are not permitted to begin work before their normal starting time or work after their normal quitting time without the prior approval of their supervisor. Page 2 5.7.3 Employees are required to take scheduled lunch breaks and are required to take scheduled morning and afternoon breaks. 5.7.4 Employee time sheets should be checked and signed by the supervisor involved. 5.7.5 Unapproved absences am not considered as hours worked for pay purposes. Supervisors should inform employees if they will not be paid for certain hours in which they are or were absent from work. 5.7.6 Filling out another employee's lime sheet-Nf.msoaa9menCaa�lul to'" pnil or falsifying any time sheet is prohibited and may be grounds for disciplinary action,up to and including termination. 5.7.7 Time sheets must be completed in ink. Time worked should be charged to the appropriate work order category,and time sheets must be signed by both the employee and supervisor. If an employee is unable to complete their time sheet due to absence,the timesheet must be completed by the supervisor or designee(e:d.'`drn 'aiMonzed�y-:ifiteM-to pio�sssssky, §s rmes ee e�'-'"Pteaf6e' �and submitted to timekeeping. When the employee returns to work,another copy of the timesheet should be signed by both the employee and the supervisor and sent to timekeeping. 5.7.8 An employee must record all time taken as paid or unpaid leave. Any day with less than the typical amount of time for that shift recorded,usually 8,9, 10 or 12 hours, must be supported by an explanation of the missing hours in an appropriate space on the sheet. Total hours recorded for each day or shift must agree with the total time for the pay period. 5.7.9 Time sheets will be distributed and collected by supervisors or other designated individuals and submitted to Timekeeping in the Accounting Office no later than Friday noon each week. Time sheets may vary depending upon the operational needs of each department,but will conform to the above requirements. Supervisors are responsible for ensuring that time sheets are submitted in a timely manner. Corrections to a time sheet entry may only be made by supervisors drawing a single line through the incorrect entry,writing the correct entry in the margin,and initialing the change. 5.8 Payday. Paychecks are distributed on the Wednesday immediately preceding the close of a pay period. Checks received on Wednesday cover the period worked during the previous pay period. if a payday falls on a holiday, checks will normally be distributed on the last working day preceding the holiday. Employees who will not be at work on payday may request that their checks be held, forwarded to their supervisor,or mailed directly to them. Unclaimed checks will be held in the Payroll Office. Checks of individuals who terminate their employment with the District, or are separated,will be mailed directly to them on the next regular payday subsequent to the separation date unless other arrangements are made to hold the check. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Flextime does not apply to the Operations and Maintenance Department and General Services Administration Department. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended. Page 3 Orange County Policy Number: F20.10 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: HOURS OF WORK— EXEMPT Supersedes: December 9, 1996 EMPLOYEES Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of the District's working hours. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District exempt employees in all organizational units and departments unless otherwise specified. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Exempt Employees are employees who are not covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Such employees are considered exempt by virtue of their duties in conformance with the Act's definition of Executive,Administrative and Professional employees. Flextime is the option of employees to choose the starting and finishing times of their shift. Overtime is the number of hours in paid status in excess of 40 during a workweek. Memo time is the number of hours in excess or short of the normal working hours for an employee in a single workday. The normal working hours could be 8,9, 10 or 12 depending on the employee's assigned schedule. Make-up time is time worked in the second week of the pay period to make-up for a shortage of time in the first week of the pay period. Core Hours are the hours between 8:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.on any given day. Payday is the Wednesday before the end of the subsequent pay period. Pay Periods .f. �Cp a - 81�8.0°�1�09.11•pllr$LWe'f0. �n �}s1p-44�dit��rb�i`fdrt1�16a1�8a`�-o;h"titO ioSurrsa Or�onlBr�epy'e'rn""snF CiO_3an8 seU�aw1a ttW?�B0.�"52ti4o-uf`i o �eaods<,DiH'1s�atrit�l.cn.7Go�earapaapihrs(l�o�'�"rtehen`�fwngko.i,9tlae fella rstrd in eice_�d, ngp`' orf�"f�168=5� spclwo x j�Tea'"`Z:h#employeela;flxed�fiy7lhe•Generl Ivlanagsu�. �n�e'aand�is mein ineil_tiyE, 1egtounl�ingEo11_offje' 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the policy of the District to require exempt employees to complete weekly timesheets. Exempt employees must use sick time,vacation time or compensatory time for any partial-day absences. Page t 4.2 In certain situations employees may not be required to use leave time for partial-day absences and may be eligible to use"make up lime"or"memo time if they will be working more than eighty(80) hours in the same pay period. (Please refer to the sample timesheet.) , 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Normal Business Hours. Administrative and business functions are normally performed between the hours of 7:30 a.m.and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday,and between the hours of 7:30 a.m.and 4:30 p.m.on Friday. However,the District allows flextime for employees to choose their starting and finishing times as long as employees whose jobs involve contact with the public or outside organizations are present between the core hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. In addition,department heads may deny flextime to certain employees for reasons of business necessity,workflow,or customer service needs. 5.2 Core Hours. Individual divisions may schedule work beyond the core hours of 8:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m., subject to approval by the department head,to meet specific operating or service requirements in the most cost-effective and efficient manner. Actual starting and ending times of an employee's shift may vary depending on the operational requirements of each department. 5.31Shift Schedules. pure 7Ulesr pr eelCefor`fit�Yrr),tae th �8&!dour io�a b��pamlflbasis+'oTs80 �rw - ch7al..v3or1�'fia�3SersLjre' uJe�nur.. 9-hoY+r2'ays)and`pne ro�if da`y+ea�r> `r Cw 97 tscfLed r)e)��ive,8 -ay (10180� -l�ouq ad"ys�eachworkwee,- 8/�2e�2_fio n on oa tn-daj d e>•d�rrrd yeach wgrlcw�ek r!/¢0)'at the�Cistaehon of�'die'Super4isor 5.4 Meeting Attendance. Employee attendance at lectures,meetings,and training programs will be considered as part of an employee's work hours if attendance is requested by management. Overtime or compensatory time may be allowed for such attendance only in unusual circumstances and must be approved by the department head in advance of the meeting. 5.5 Time Sheets-Exempt Employees. Personnel, as defined by the exempt job classifications generally of the Fair Labor Standards Act,are not eligible to receive overtime pay;however,exempt employees must account for daily attendance. 5.5.1 Time sheets for exempt employees should indicate the days worked during the pay period and include all time taken as paid or unpaid leave. Timesheets should report a total of eighty (80)hours per pay period plus any applicable memo time. 5.5.2 Hours in excess or short of the daily total should be accounted for in the work description line titled"Memo Time". (Please see the attached timesheet example). The appropriate subledger number should be entered,and the time sheet signed by the appropriate management level. When using subledger numbers time should be recorded in blocks of half hours or more. 5.5.3 Employees may be able to draw hours from their"memo time in certain situations. Memo time is NOT compensatory time and will NOT be granted on an hour for hour basis. It is to be used on an exception basis and must be approved In advance by the supervisor. For example,if Employee works 48.5 total hours in week one and needs to use 2.5 hours to go to a doctor's appointment in week two,the supervisor may approve using memo time.(Please refer to the attached sample timesheets). Memo time, in some occurrences, may be allowed for an entire day. 5.5.4 Make-up time may be used tt the employee will need to use the 2.5 hours in the first week of the pay period and will work an extra hours(of a least 2.5 hours)in the second week of the Page 2 pay period to"make up"for the shortage of hours. Again, it is to be used on an exception basis and must be approved in advance by the supervisor. 5.5.5 Exempt personnel time sheets should be submitted to Timekeeping in the Accounting office no later than Friday of each week. In addition,exempt employees will not receive overtime compensation (except as specifically agreed to in an applicable bargaining unit MOU)but occasionally may be eligible for time-off after working abnormally long hours. 5.5.6 Time sheets must be completed in. Time worked should be charged to the appropriate work order category,and time sheets must be signed by both the employee and supervisor. If an employee is unable to complete their time sheet due to absence,the timesheet must be completed by the supervisor or designee(e'g 7 T� esu�Yfi_o. 6y`mana„gefig �rogess@rnpl, �s tive.s 8 nSfilTe _n a;leBV f-aD98rlce)and submitted to timekeeping. When the employee returns to work,another copy of the timesheet should be signed by both the employee and the supervisor and sent to timekeeping. 5.5.7 Coworkers gufm�nage"'r�r�e �, "or 'floe completing another Coworkers time sheet or employee's falsifying any timesheet is prohibited and may be grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended. 8.2 Professional and Supervisory M.O.U. Page 3 Orange County Policy Number: F70.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: April 26, 2000 Subject: DISCIPLINE Supersedes: October 22, 1997 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for use in the administration of fair and consistent discipline in instances where employees have exceeded the limits of acceptable behavior or performance. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 All District employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS Discipline is the occurrence of any of the following actions taken for just cause with respect to any €employee:oral reprimand,counseling memo,written warning,suspension with n without pay, reduction in pay,demotion to a classification with a lower tap step maximum rate of pay, or dismissal. Dismissal is the separation from District employment of a non-probationary employee initiated by Tthe District for proper cause. "Termination"means dismissal,and the terms are used interchangeably throughout this policy manual. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District is committed to practicing supervisory and management practices and procedures which support effective operations in the interest of the District and of our employees. Such procedures include the administration of fair and consistent discipline in instances where employees have exceeded the limits of acceptable behavior or performance. Employment with the District is voluntarily entered into,and employees have the right to resign at any time to pursue other interests. Similarly,the District has the right to conclude an employment relationship for proper cause when it is believed to be in the Districts best interests. 4.2 The General Manager is authorized and directed to exercise supervision over all employees and to impose discipline,for just cause, upon any person employed under the provisions of this Policy for both general and serious violations. 4.3 The General Manager shall establish rules and guidelines pertaining to the procedures governing such actions. Page 1 4.4 The General Manager is authorized to delegate his authority herein to the Department Heads,Division Mangers, Director of Human Resources and other management and supervisory employees,as the General Manager deems appropriate. Notwithstanding the foregoing,'at-will"Executive Management employees may be dismissed at any time, without notice or just cause. 4.5 Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive Management and contract employees who have signed an agreement to serve at the pleasure of the Joint Boards or General Manager are "at-will"and may be dismissed at any time,without notice or just cause. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Discipline occurs when any of the following actions are taken for just cause with respect to any employee:oral reprimand, counseling memo,written warning,suspension with without pay, , reduction in pay,demotion to a classification with a lower tap ate maximum rate of pay, or dismissal. Dismissal is the termination from District employment, of a non-probationary employee, initiated by the District for proper cause. Employees exempt from overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, however,shall not be subject to suspension without pay for less than one week except for major safety violations. 5.2 A Notice of Intent to impose disciplinary action is not required when the disciplinary action involves an oral reprimand,seuaseling memo,written warning or suspension without pay for five or fewer working days . 5.3 A Notice of Intent to impose disciplinary action is required and will be given to an employee whenever the disciplinary action involves suspension without pay for more than five working days, reduction in pay,demotion to a classification with a lower top step maximum late of pay or dismissal. The Notice of Intent shall be given to the affected employee either by delivery in person or by Certified Mail sent to the employee's last know address. The Notice of Intent shall indicate the date on which 4 was personally delivered or deposited in the mail, which shall be the date of issuance. 5.3.1 The Notice of Intent shall contain a description of the disciplinary action intended,the effective date of the action,the reasons for the proposed action,and a copy of the charges and materials upon which the action is based. The Notice shall also provide a statement of the employee's right to respond, either orally or in writing to the authority initially imposing the discipline,the person to whom any response must be directed,and the fact that such response must be received within ten business days of the date of issuance of the notice. The Notice will also advise the employee of their right to representation. 5.4 Prior to the effective date of any proposed disciplinary action requiring a Notice of Intent,the employee will be given an opportunity to respond either orally or In writing to a management representative with authority to make an effective recommendation on a proposed action. After review of an employee's response,the District will notify the employee in writing of any action to be taken. Such action may not involve discipline more severe than that described in the Notice of Intent; however,the District may reduce discipline without further notice. 5.5 Dismissal shall be proceeded by at least one written warning,except in those situations in which the employee knows or reasonably should have known that the performance or conduct was unsatisfactory. Such performance or conduct may involve, but is not limited to: dishonesty,possession, use, sale or being under the influence or drugs or alcohol,theft or misappropriation of District's property,talsification of District' records,fighting on the job, Insubordination, acts endangering people or property,or other serious misconduct. The Page 2 District may also substitute a documented suspension,with or without pay, in lieu of the written warning requirement herein. 5.6 If a Notice of Intent is upheld and the disciplinary action is imposed,the employee may request a post-disciplinary hearing. The request must be submitted to the Director of Human Resources within ten business days after the date of issuance of the notice of disciplinary action. The Director of Human Resources shall schedule a post-disciplinary hearing with the General Manager or his designee. The General Manager,or his designee, may uphold the disciplinary action,which has been taken or may reduce such discipline without the issuance of further notice. The decision of the General Manager or his designee shall be final. 5.7 The above procedure, including the right to post disciplinary hearing,shall apply to the discipline and dismissal of Executive Management employees,who have not signed an at-will employment agreement and who are not governed by a memorandum of understanding. 5.8 The District may place an employee on iavestigateq administrative leave without prior notice in order to review or investigate allegations of conduct which,in the District's view,would warrant relieving the employee immediately from all work duties. If, upon conclusion of the investigation, neither suspension without pay nor dismissal is determined by the District to be appropriate,.the employee shall be paid for the leave. Although an iavestigateq administrative,leave may exceed fifteen business days,if a suspension without pay is determined to be the appropriate discipline,a maximum of fifteen business days of the investigatey administrative leave period maybe applied to such suspension without pay. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Policy 8100.00 Employee Separation. Page 3 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT March 20, 2000, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint OCSD/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on March 20, 2000. Members of the Committee present were: Director Norm Eckenrode Director Iry Pickier, Chair -Absent Director Peer Swan Director Philip L. Anthony Director Jan Debay Director Lawrence P. Kraemer Jr. General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, Alt. General Manager William Mills Jr., Alt. Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Director Russell Patterson Debbie Burris Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Blake Anderson Steve Conklin Dick Comeille, Camp Dresser McKee Inc. Bob Ghirelli Thomas M. Dawes Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. David Ludwin Jill Everhart Brenda Deeley, NCG Porter Novelli Bob Oolen Cindy Gehman Johnny Perkins, NCG Porter Novelli Michelle Tuchman John Kennedy Rick Davis, NCG Porter Novelli Greg Leslie Ron Linsky, NWRI Julia Norman Mary McDaniel, McDaniel Lambert Graham Juby, Carollo Engineers Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers John Collins, Councilman, City of Fountain Valley Upon motion by Norm Eckenrode, seconded by Larry Kraemer, Jr. and carried the Committee appointed Director Swan to act as vice-chair in Director Pickler's absence. Since Director Collins' departure, no vice-chair has been selected. Director Swan introduced Russell Patterson, an OCSD Director, who will serve as an alternate committee member. 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Minutes of the Joint Committee meeting held February 24, 2000 were approved as mailed. GWR System Minutes r March 20, 2000 Page 2 of 3 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Report on Proiect Development Phase Issues: Development Information Memorandum No. 3, Microfiltration Project Manager Tom Dawes introduced Senior Engineer Greg Leslie and Bruce Chalmers of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) who gave a presentation on design information memoranda (DIM) 3, Microfiltration. It was noted that microfiltration provides the best pre-treatment for the GWR System. There are four manufacturers being evaluated, two of which provide units that are 'above grade' and two that are 'in basin'. A new round of demonstration tests to verify performance criteria will be completed by September 1, 2000. The Committee engaged in considerable exchange on the subject and discussed contracting options. It was noted that no action will be necessary until late summer. 2. Change to Joint Cooperative Committee Membership No discussion. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee recommended that a recommendation be made to both the OCSD and OCWD Boards to 1) make a change in Alternate Director membership, selecting three directors from each agency and 2) to relieve the general managers from their duties as alternates. 3. Report on Project Development Phase: Status of Develooment Information Memoranda (DIM) Staff reported on the status of the Technical Program Development Information Memoranda (DIM). Status books were presented to the Committee members for the 32 separate DIMS being prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Staff reported that the project work is on schedule. 4. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following items: 1. Carl Nelson would be asked to review the barrier well sites that are on public property. An appraiser will be engaged to give direction on sites located on private property. 2. Responses to OCSD questions were sent March 9 to the Committee. No discussion. v GWR System Minutes March 20, 2000 Page 3 of 3 3. Expiration of his employee contract on April 22, 2000 and his request for salary of$92.50 per hour for the new contract. 4. Dr. Leslie's resignation and departure from OCWD at the end of April 2000. 5. Mr. McIntyre and Mr. Dawes met with Hawkins, Delafield and Wood, attorneys from New York, that have offered to give the Committee a presentation in June or July regarding legal requirements on design-build specifications. Staff will schedule a presentation. Brenda Deeley from NCG Porter Novelli, reported the following: 1. This quarter's newsletter will be mailed out by the end of this week. 2. Announced that she would be leaving NCG at the end of this month and that Johhnie Perkins will fill her position on the project. 3. Introduced Rick Davis, Vice-President of NCG, who replaced Larry Tenney who left NCG. 5. General Managers Comments Mr. Mills gave a report on the ACWA conference he attended in Washington D.C. Mr. McIntyre announced that Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez would be attending the March 25, 2000 Board Workshop at OCSD. 6. Directors Comments Director Debay requested that Mr. Mills compose a funding priority list for her to give to Congressman Ron Packard, who is not running for reelection. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Committee meeting is scheduled for April 17, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeedngDare ToBa.ofar. a 6/ AGENDA REPORT Item Number Hem Numbe 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dennis May, Project Manager SUBJECT: LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF WATER FACTORY 21 GROUNDWATER INJECTION WELL AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES FROM ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve License Agreement with the Orange County Water District for the construction and operation of Water Factory 21 Groundwater Injection Well and Conveyance Facilities from the Orange County Water District, in form approved by General Counsel, at no cost to the District. SUMMARY The Orange County Water District (OCWD) is expanding its Water Factory 21 groundwater injection barrier facilities to satisfy increases in demand for reclaimed water. The project consists of construction of groundwater injection well, pipelines, and appurtenances on the Sanitation District's property at the northeast comer of Plant No. 1. The project site is approximately 9,900 square feet in size. An agreement is required to provide OCWD with access to the project site. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY OCWD is responsible for all design, construction, surveying, inspection, and ongoing operational costs. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) R .;..a: ar Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Under the proposed Agreement, the Orange County Water District (OCWD) will own the injection well, pipelines, and appurtenances. The Orange County Sanitation District will retain ownership of its property. The Agreement gives OCWD rights of access to their facilities at all times for inspection, operation, maintenance, or other purposes. Under the Agreement, OCWD will require their construction contractors to maintain liability insurance naming the Orange County Sanitation District, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds. ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS OCWD is the lead agency and is responsible for full CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS None DM:jo:jak \YadorNdata I Wp.dla%gendMBoard Agenda Repoft=00 Board Agenda Reporls\04001lem 16.doe R. exiea Page 2 Meenq Die To BOARD OF DIRECTORS 8e' oaizsioo AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ieem NumMr v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATION OF, AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE USER FEE RATE FOR, REVENUE AREAS 1, 2, 3. 5. 6, 11 AND 13 (REVENUE AREAS 7 AND 14 TO CONTINUE CURRENT REVENUE PROGRAM) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION The General Manager recommends rate and financial consolidation of Revenue Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 for fiscal year 2001-01, including the postponement of portions of user fee increases previously adopted through 2001-02. SUMMARY At the last Board meeting the Directors agreed informally that the proposal had merit and should be pursued. They directed staff to present a recommendation to the Board in April. This action will reduce annual user fees for approximately two-thirds of the District's users, while maintaining previously approved increases only for the balance over the next two years. A letter of opposition has been received from the Mayor of Garden Grove, and is included in this package with staff comments. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Minimal costs, other than staff time. Financial and rate consolidation results in overall lower average user fees. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our service paradigm to a regional focus and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a basic change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically, this change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate .M ftW.^��RN7u a .A .R..ombNW 17,. R....e: nmve Page 1 Revenue Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one user fee rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee structure, and Revenue Area 14 would continue to be funded by the existing contracts with the Irvine Ranch Water District. There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy. • Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified • Auditing is simplified and the cost is reduced • Issuing long-term financing is simplified • Staffing and financing costs are reduced • Establishing sewer service fees is simplified • Explaining sewer service fees is simplified There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into consideration. • Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers • Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users • Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRWD and receives no property tax or user fees directly from property owners • Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid "cash" for most of their share of facilities • Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets Each of these advantages, disadvantages, and special situations are described in the attached Staff Report. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing, continue to adopt eight separate rates. 2. Find another method to compensate RA 1 for tax-exempt parcels. 3. Maintain current rates in higher-rate RAs until others are raised. 4. Implement rate increases approved in 1997, then same as above. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report with exhibits. 2. Letter from Mayor of Garden Grove with staff comments. MMydd•GeMBB ,a Ap da RepY{511CCLBl AP R,p M M17 am R..e.a arose Page 2 t April 26, 2000 STAFF REPORT Proposed Rate Structure In 1947 a blue-ribbon panel recommended the creation of individual Sanitation Districts to serve all of Orange County. In 1954 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 joined together to own and operate treatment and disposal facilities. Between 1954 and 1979 these Districts established annual budgets and property tax rates in order to provide necessary sewage collection treatment and disposal services. The individual property tax rates were a function of both financial need and property assessed valuation. The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 changed the funding process. No longer were the Districts able to establish property tax rates sufficient to meet their needs. In fact, the Districts had no control over property tax rates. Additionally, assessed values were reduced for many parcels and future assessed value growth was limited. In 1979, in an effort to develop a permanent tax allocation method to implement Proposition 13, the State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 8. Basically, AB 8 allocates the total "1% basic levy" collected within the County, adjusted first for redevelopment agencies, to each of the taxing agencies in the same ratios as those agencies received property taxes in 1979-80. Since both the ratios and the 1% rate are fixed county-wide, the only property tax variable within the service areas is assessed value. Because the various Sanitation Districts had a pay-as-you-go philosophy and differing capital and operating funding needs in the late 1970's, they had differing property tax rates. The result of all of this is differing "effective tax rates" in each of the current Revenue Areas today as follows: R/A 1998-99 AV Effective Tax Rate Tax Allocation 1 $ 6.513.664,662 .00027596 $1 797.414 2 35.082.620 856 .00028162 9,879,842 3 33 838,165.681 .00031991 10 825,321 5 10 871 149.227 .00026484 2,879 152 6 5,934,887167 .00022281 1,322,326 7 16.034,002,091 .00019568 3,137,591 11 9,021,892,230 .00024819 2,239,175 13 2 796.831.476 0 0 14 14:495,514,969 0 1 0 OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Proposed Rate Structure Page 2 , April 26, 2000 "Supplemental" User Fees In 1979 the Board of Directors adopted a Revenue Program. Such a program was a requirement of the Federal Clean Water Act and of the Districts' participation in the Clean Water Grant program. The Revenue Program provided that property taxes would continue to be the basic revenue source for the Districts. All industrial users and large commercial users would pay an additional charge based upon their actual quantity and strength of sewage discharged to our system. Finally, as property tax and other revenues became insufficient to fund the casts of operating, maintaining, rehabilitating and constructing necessary sewerage facilities, a "supplemental" user fee was authorized for all users. The need for these supplemental user fees did not arise in each of the Districts at the same time or in the same magnitude. The following schedule indicates the initiation date and rate, the current rate, and the 1999-2000 rate, if the proposal had been in effect. The amounts shown are the annual rates for a single-family residence; different rates are charged for multi-family and for non-residential users, based upon their waste flow and strength assumptions. District or Proposed Revenue Implementation Initial 11999.2000 1999-2000 Area Date SFR Rate SFR Rats Rate 1 1984 $26.40 $110.04 $76.00 2 1990 55.00 76.00 76.00 3 1989 30.38 76.00 76.00 5 1982 26.40 87.50 76.00 6 1983 26.40 80.00 76.00 7 1991 40.00 66.00 76.00 11 1888 28.42 90.00 76.00 13 1985 70.00 100.00 76.00 14 NIA NIA I NIA I WA Because of the variance in rates and abilities to pay among the Revenue Areas, the recent consolidation of the individual Districts into one District, and a shift in our focus to a regional viewpoint and mission, some Directors and staff have considered a basic change in the bookkeeping and rate-setting practices for the District. Basically, this change would combine the assets and liabilities for several of the separate Revenue Areas into one Revenue Area and then adopt one financial plan, including one user fee rate. Revenue Area 7 would continue to be funded through the adopted fee structure while other issues are resolved over the next year or two. Revenue Area 14 would continue to be funded by existing contracts with the Irvine Ranch Water District. Proposed Rate Structure Page 3 ' April 26, 2000 There are certain advantages to a one District, one rate policy. • Bookkeeping and accounting are simplified • Auditing is simplified and the cost is reduced • Issuing long-term financing is simplified • Staffing and financing costs are reduced • Establishing sewer service fees is simplified • Explaining sewer service fees is simplified There are also disadvantages and special situations that must be taken into consideration. • Revenue Area 7 is uniquely responsible for approximately 200 miles of local sewers. • Revenue Area 13 receives none of the property taxes paid by users. • Revenue Area 14 is funded by the IRWD and receives no property tax or user fees directly from property owners. • Revenue Areas 13 and 14 have very little debt and have paid "cash" for most of their share of facilities. • Each of the Revenue Areas has different levels of cash reserves and net assets. Issues Outstanding Debt All of the Revenue Areas have issued some certificates of participation (COPs)to pay for collection and treatment facilities. The annual principal and interest payments are made from property taxes. User fees are used for some of the COP service in Revenue Area 1, and for all of it in Revenue Areas 13 and 14. The outstanding COPs in Revenue Areas 13 and 14 amount to $1,998,245. This debt could be sold to the District thereby taking it off the books of RA 13 and 14, along with an equal amount of cash, and putting it on the looks of the District. In this manner the current debt service of the District would continue to be paid from property taxes. Since Revenue Areas 13 and 14 receive no property taxes and would have no outstanding COPS, they would not be participating. Future COPs would be issued by the District, and principal and interest payments would be made from future user fees. Cash Reserves and Net Assets While we all prefer to measure our economic or financial position by considering our cash and other assets, a more proper measure for the District would be net assets. In our case, net assets is the sum of our cash reserves and fixed assets, less the sum of accumulated depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities. The distribution of net assets, what is left over after all our obligations are met, is shown in the following table: Proposed Rate Structure r Page 4 April 26. 2000 RIA NET ASSETS ffttAssets l Per Per$100 RIA effi tta Per MGD Per EDU AV 1 871 $ 159 $10 494 $55 2 403 426 26 am 75 3 909 371 27 94554068 79 51 509 i 264 53 2 361 61 63 875 403 33 993 73 77 794 614 30 953 61 113 871 532 31 1 32 70 13 474 758 65 2,673 2 AVG $422 $E7 $1 001 $3 865 $72 Property Taxes We have previously discussed the differing shares of the property tax basic levy allocated to the individual Revenue Areas. One additional consideration is the total amount of the 1% basic levy. This tax levy is a result of Proposition 13, which limited the total basic property tax within the State to 1% of the assessed value. The base year assessed value was established as the value in 1975, thus removing four years of increased value from the tax roll. The District's service area includes a wide variety of property development, use, and value. There are very high value properties and very low value properties. There are properties with the 1975 value and there are properties developing and selling today. There are even properties with no assessed value. Whatever the assessed value, the District receives an average of 2.7% of the 1% basic levy. That is $27 a year for an assessed value of$100,000. Revenue Area 1 has the majority of the parcels with no assessed valuation, and which pay no property taxes. This is because the County seat and several State and Federal facilities are located in that area. It also has a concentration of some of the older homes and businesses in the County. The average assessed value in RA 1 is less than half of the average value per capita in RA 2-13, and only 64%of the average value per EDU. Clearly RA 1 receives a disproportionately low share of the property tax, because of this low assessed value, while providing a disproportionately large share of regional services such as courts,jails and county administration for our service area. The future availability of property tax revenues to special districts is uncertain at this time. A loss of property taxes would result in increased user fees that would be more uniform than current fees. Proposed Rate Structure Page 5 Apol 26, 2000 Revenue Area 7 This is really a separate issue to be addressed later. It is included here only to explain why RA7 is excluded from the recommendation Revenue Area 7 includes parts of the cities of Tustin, Irvine, Orange, Newport Beach and Santa Ana, as well as some major unincorporated areas. In 1986, the District took over the responsibility for local sewer service from the Seventh and Seventieth Sewer Maintenance Districts which were administered by the County. This action made then District 7 unique amongst the Sanitation Districts; it became the only District(Revenue Area) that is responsible for maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of local sewers. Local sewers are generally owned and operated by a city, sanitary district or water district. This is the case in all of the other Revenue Areas and in some parts of Revenue Area 7. The areas generally and loosely described as City of Tustin, Irvine Business Center, and unincorporated areas comprise the former Sewer Maintenance Districts. In these area,which includes the Tustin Air Base, Revenue Area 7 is responsible for approximately 200 miles of local, small-diameter sewers. There are several issues to be resolved involving these local sewers. Ultimately these local sewers will need to be rehabilitated or repaired. A 1998 review by RW Beck, an engineering fine, projected costs of$40 million between 2038 and 2040 without regard for inflation. Currently, these projected costs have not been included in the adopted annual sewer service user fees. In order to have these funds available when needed, an additional $9 would need to be added to the current annual SFR user fee. The impact on fees, if the funds are not accumulated in advance, would be an additional $185 per SFR in the first year, decreasing to$117 and $78 in the following years. Much of these former Sewer Maintenance Districts receive water service from the Irvine Ranch Water District. This includes all of the Irvine Business Center, parts of Tustin, and unincorporated areas. Additionally, the Tustin Air Base is scheduled to be served by the IRWD. The IRWD has proposed that local sewer service responsibilities be transferred from Revenue Area 7 to the IRWD wherever IRWD provides water service. This would be consistent with the rest of the IRWD service area and with Revenue Area 14. One of the reasons the Sanitation Districts assumed this local service responsibility in 1986 was to protect the property taxes. Approximately 48% and 67% of the property taxes would have been diverted to the Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF), if the Sewer Maintenance Districts remained intact or if responsibilities were transferred to the cities. Staff has been able to reconstruct the property tax, user fee, and local sewer maintenance costs since 1986, but is still researching the allocation of joint works treatment operations and capital improvements. Preliminary estimates indicate there Proposed Rate Structure Page 6 April 26, 2000 may be some residual funds available to begin to fund the rehabilitation and replacement needs discussed earlier. Of course, if the local sewer responsibilities were transferred to IRW D, then the accumulated funds and future taxes would be transferred along with the fixed assets. While these local sewer related issues are being discussed, negotiated and resolved, staff recommends that Revenue Area 7 be excluded from the proposed consolidation of assets, liabilities and user fees. Once these issues are resolved and Revenue Area 7 is like the rest of the District, or there is a method to fund and account for local sewer rehabilitation and replacement, it will be appropriate to reconsider the final step of consolidation. Many believe that recent actions and current proposals at the USEPA will ultimately require the OCSD to assume responsibility for all local sewers. Revenue Area 14 The Irvine Ranch Water District provides local sewer service to all of Revenue Area 14. There are several agreements and contracts dating back to 1985 that contain the details of the IRWD connection to the District. In the simplest of terms, the IRW D is billed directly for the Revenue Area 14 share of operating, maintenance, capital improvement, and certificate of participation costs. Treatment plant 0&M and capital costs are based upon actual flows. Neither the alternative nor the proposal is expected to change any of the provisions of the existing agreements. Neither the alternative nor the proposal includes collecting Revenue Area 14 user fees on the property tax bill. Alternative Proposal Some Directors may agree that the annual sewer service user fee in RA 1 is higher than may be appropriate, but are not yet willing to consolidate the fees. A potential alternative is for the other RA's to compensate RA 1 for the assessed value and property tax lost to regional state and federal governmental tax-exempt properties. In order for the average assessed value per EDU in RA 1 to equal the average, $3,563,463,200 would need to be added to the RA 1 assessed value. At the equivalent tax rate in RA 1, that additional value would generate $983,337. Using the assessed value per capita method, the additional property taxes would be $1,861,197. If RA 1 had additional revenues of this amount, the SFR annual user fee could be reduced from $110.04 to $84.70 as shown in the following table. Proposed Rate Structure Page 7 April 26, 2000 1999.2000 Prop Tax Revised RANEDUSFR Rate ReimblEDU SFR RATE 1 $110.04 $25.64 $84.70 2 76.00 2.13 78.13 3 76.00 2.13 78.13 5 87.50 2.13 89.63 6 80.00 2.13 82.13 7 66.00 2.13 68.13 11 90.00 2.13 92.13 13 100.00 2.13 102.13 14• 23.800 84.03 2.13 88.16 'RA 14 EDU and Rate are w0mated from average daily flow and$2 million per year contribution. Attachments Several worksheets and graphs are enclosed with this report. They are intended to provide background information, and to answer questions that may have been unanswered in the body of the report. Each is briefly described with bullet points in the following sections. Exhibit A: Revenue Area Representation • When current fees were established the vote was by District. Each Director voted only on the fees in the District which included the Director's city. • Since the 1998 consolidation, all of the Directors vote for all of the Revenue Areas, whether or not that Director's city is included in the Revenue Area. • A vote to change fees now requires a two-thirds vote of all of the Directors, or 17 votes. • This schedule provides an idea of how many people and cities are affected by rate decisions. The shading is only to facilitate reading; it has no meaning. Exhibit B: Analysis of Net Assets • Net assets is a better measure of current economic health than simply "reserves" or cash balances. Net assets is the sum of current cash balances and fixed assets, less the sum of depreciation, outstanding debt and other liabilities. • The ranking of Revenue Areas by net assets can be based on several variables. Using just the total is too simplistic and misleading because of the vastly varying sizes of the Revenue Areas. • The chart shows net assets for each Revenue Area on the basis of per capita, per flow in million gallons a day, per acre of land and per $100 of assessed value. Proposed Rate Structure Page 8 April 26, 2000 • The highlights show that ranking by each of the variables produces a different Revenue Area with the highest value. This indicates that the relationship between net assets and user fees may not be a good decision criteria as selecting the variable alters the result. Exhibit C: Previously Adopted Supplemental User Fees • The first user fee was adopted in 1982 in District 5. Other Districts adopted fees as their financial situations required, until all had user fees in 1991. • Regular, routine and required fee increases were a part of the Financial Plan adopted in 1990. • Rate increases were deferred from 1991 to 1997 because of the poor economy. • In 1992-93 fees were increased as an urgency measure to replace property taxes anticipated to be confiscated by the State. District 11 did not increase fees at this time. • In 1997 Districts 1 and 11 adopted 10-year rate increases and Districts 2 through 7 adopted 5-year rate increases after considerable study and evaluation of alternatives. • When the Districts consolidated on July 1, 1998, the new District adopted the previously approved rate increases through 2001-02 for each of the Revenue Areas. The remaining 5 years of adjustments for Revenue Areas 1 and 11 were not adopted. • The adoption of a revised rate structure for 1998-1999 after the Rate Advisory Committee and Strategic Plan process allowed for some minor rate decreases in order for the program to be "revenue neutral." The shaded rates are somewhat lower than the maximum authorized in 1997 because of the structure change. • No Board actions are required to implement the previously adopted rates or slightly reduced rates for 2000-01 and/or 2001-02. Exhibit D: SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown • Many factors affect user fee calculations, including costs and revenues. • All current revenue streams are projected to continue. • User fees are for three main categories of costs: Operations & Maintenance, Capital Improvements and Rehabilitation, and Debt Service. Proposed Rate Structure Page 9 April 26, 2000 • New debt financing requires increased fees, but not as soon as pay-as-you-go. • Summary schedule for 1999-2000, 2003-04 and 2008-09 shows that the majority of increased user fees will be used for the capital improvement program and debt service. • New fees must be adopted in 2003-04 unless no increases are needed. Exhibit E: Projected SFR User Fees Charts • There are individual graphics for four alternatives. • Alternative 1 is the status quo. Each Revenue Area adopts its own fees based upon its own needs. This alternative raises the most fees. • Alternative 2 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years. Fees above the average are then maintained until the average reaches their level. By 2013-14, all Revenue Areas will have the same fee. This alternative avoids fee increases for several years after 2002-03 in Revenue Areas 1, 5, 11 and 13. • Alternative 3 implements the previously adopted fees for the next two years also. In 2002-03 all Revenue Areas adopt the same fee. This alternative results in reduced fees for users in Revenue Areas 1, 3, 5, 11 and 13; approximately 1.2 million people. • Alternative 4 maintains the 1999-2000 rates for most RAs. These rates do not decrease. Instead, they are maintained above the average until the average reaches their level. This alternative avoids previously adopted increases in 2000-01 for about 576,000 users. All users would be on the same rate schedule in 2010-11. • Alternative 5, the proposal, implements the unified consolidated rate immediately in 2000-01, unless the previously adopted rate is lower. In that case, the previously adopted rates are implemented until they reach the average. All Revenue Areas are paying the same rate in 2001-02. This alternative results in rate decreases in 2000- 01 for Revenue Areas 1, 2, 5, 6, 11 and 13, approximately 1.3 million people. Exhibit F: One District Excluding 7 & 14 One Rate Cash Flow Projections • Provides "detail" to support earlier summary of User Fee Breakdown. • Schedule assumes property taxes, line 3, will continue to be allocated to District. • 0&M Expense, line 9, is based on current cost per mg and projected flows. • Capital Outlay, line 10, is from Strategic Plan and current budget. Proposed Rate Structure Page 10 April 26, 2000 • COP Services, line 11, assumes 25-year debt shown on line 4 at 6.5%. Repaying $100,000,000 adds approximately $11.00 to the annual user fee. • Annual SFR User Fees are shown on line 17 and calculate the amounts on line 1. • Schedule shows constant connection fee rate, line 20, pending periodic revisions of the Strategic Plan. • Schedule reflects Alternative 5, the lowest rates. Other alternatives would raise more fees. • Projected ending reserves. GGS:lc H\wp.Eta\fin@10\acne\FAHR\Fah2000\ApftSRAprB mCansRAs.dx 04/1512000 2:10 PM Revenue Area Representation Population Description 1 2 3 5 6 7 it 13 Jan 1, 1999 Est Population,2000 228,965 656,434 749,953 61.119 111.470 169,146 128,774 46,072 Anaheim X X X 306,298 Brea X X X 36,388 Buena Park X - 75869 Costa Mesa X X X 105.608 Cypress X 48,517 Fountain Valley X X 66,445 Fullerton X X 126,757 Garden Grove X X 156.534 Huntington Beach X X 196,660 Irvine X 136,577 La Habra X X 55,805 La Palma X 16,395 Los Alamitos X 12,031 Newport Beach X X X 73,965 Orange X X X X 127,603 Placentia X 49,127 Santa Ana X X X X 314,990 Seal Beach X _ 27,192 Stanton X 33,853 Tustin X X . 66.834 Villa Park X 6,630 Westminster X 86,248 m Yorba Linda X X 61,839 = W 1 D_ G:bztal.INa1Rn12/alsbeetl191acY VeNeh Sunray 2e0e 04/15/2000 2:12 PM Analysis of Net Assets Assets Minus Liabilities Including COPS Shading Indicates Highest Value Net Assets Per RA Total Capita MGD Acre $100 AV 1 35,927,871 159 10 2,983 55 2 263,057.403 426 26 3,874 75 3 265,754,909 371 27 4,068 5 65,881,509 ;1,153„ 53 5,600 61 6 43,303,875 403 33 4,414 73 7 97,507,794 614 30 4,362 61 11 62,853.871 533 31 _ 70 13 21,614,474 758 947 2 Wtd Avg 422 27 3,865 72 m x x a =t GAexcel.dWfin121 e1.atreeMMO budgehTrue consolidation Net Assets W Use_hlst Previously Adopted Supplemental User Fees 8485• 86-86 86_87 87_88 88_89 ag-9 9"1 JtR 9 93-9 $9$5 $ 96- 7 97_98 98_99 i5;� .'S 99-00 D 7 01_02 ANNUAL SFR FEES 1 26.40 26.40 28.40 26.40 34.32 45.00 55.00 76.00 83.24 83.24 53.24 83.24 83.24 91.36 100.27 - i'q1 110.04 120.77 132.55 s 2 55.00 60.00 71.52 71.52 71.52 71.52 71.52 73.00 75.00 +7q'b( ,t ?(� 00.00 82.00 3 30.36 50.00 60.00 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 73.89 75.00 76.00 '��,� 78.00 80.00 5 26.40 26.40 25.40 26.40 28.40 46.00 55.00 75.00 96.75 96.76 98.75 96.75 95.75 96.75 96.75 87;60 4tr u 6 25.40 26.40 29.04 31.68 38.02 49.00 55.00 65.00 76.47 76.47 76.47 76.47 76.47 76.00 80.00 ,.,•.(� y ,1 �00.. 84.00 86.00 7 40.00 50.09 50.09 50.09 50.09 50.09 55.00 60.00 66.00 73.00 80.00 11 28.40 40.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 80.0D 60.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.OD 101.25 113.91 13 70.00 70.00 70.00 7e.40 76.40 95.00 toD.ao 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1oD.00 ..,�� � 100.00 100.00 100.00 Rates Unchanged from year of Implementation: 'Rates were originally adopted equal to 1991.92 *RAC rate stuclure Dist 1:1984,Dist 5: 1982,Dist 6: 1983,Dist 13: 1985 but increased in response to State tax confiscation allowed decrease for SFR W a Uee_hIM t 2:17 PM 1C.) "1512000 Page 1 of 1 SFR Sewer User Fee Breakdown All Revenue Areas Except 7 and 14 1999-20DO Estimates 2003-04 Estimates 2008-09 Estimates 10 Year Ref Total Per EDU Told Par EDU Total Per EDU Total 1 Operations&Maintenance 2 Collecilen System OBM 7,720,500 10.26 8,359,000 10.98 9.231,000 11.89 84,560.500 3 Treatment Plant OBM 38.329.000 50.96 40,641,000 63.27 45.276,000 68.33 412.430.000 4 Total OBM Expense 46,048,500 61.21 49,000.000 54.23 54.607.000 70.23 496,990,500 5 Permitted User Fees (5,591,000) (7.43) (6,176,000) (8.10) (6,987.000) (9.00) (82.675.000) 6 Interest Income (20,164,000) (26,80 (17.301,000) (22.68 (16,368.000) (21.09) (184,609.000) 7 Net OBM Expense 20.293,500 26.97 25,523.000 33.45 31,152,000 40.14 249.706,500 8 Capital lmomvemanls 9 Collection System CIP 21.467.100 28.53 26,793,100 35.12 12,812,000 16.51 171,44D,000 10 Treatment Plant CIP 59.803,000 79.49 65,641,100 86.04 59,101.000 78.14 704.045,10D 11 Total Capital lmprovemt 81.270,100 108.03 92,434,200 121.16 71,913,000 92.65 875,495,10D 12 Cormse9on Fees (4,823.000) (6.41) (4,847,000) (6.35) (4,877.000) (6.28) (48.500,000) 13 Capacity Sales,SAWPA 0 0.00 (6.045,000) (7,92) 0.00 (17,591,000) 14 From Savings or New COPS (42,238,000) (56.14) (63,190,000) 82.83) (52,690,000) (67.88) (597,542.000) 15 Net Capital Outlay 34,209,100 45.47 18.352.200 24.06 14,346,000 18,48 211,852,10D 16 Debt Service 17 COP Service 32.238,000 42.85 52,976.000 69.44 70.560.000 90.91 533.865,D00 18 Property Tapes 29,668,OOD) (39.30) (32,004,000) (41.95) (35.337.000) (45.53) (323,757,000) 19 Net COP Service 2,670,000 3,55 20.972,000 27.49 35,223,000 46.38 210,108,000 20 Raised by General User Fees 57,172,600 75.D0 64,647,200 85.01) 80,721,000 104.00 671.SSE600 21 No.of Equiv Dwelling Units 752,320 762.920 776,170 22 Average Daily Flow(mgd) 240 0.000319 203 0.000345 293 0.000377 23 New Borrowing 72,000,000 92.78 495,000,000 m X W 4 Revwtue Area 99-00 Budget x7&1/ Use Fee Analysis 1:50 PM Q . � :. ;; � ; ■ �In � l I � � I � .� . � I 1 I 1 I , I � . �I s,�� �I�a ��� . � • il.�l � I � �'! ii, P,I Ili ll�i ��� �M � � � �, : � � , I�ap..� �I��1 III`'' � q 66 I � C� �i '. . 1 h '� � , . �� , . , . 1 � � � � ® • _ - � . Projected SFR User Fees - Alt 2 $180 - $160 - - - _ - - - $140 -- - $120 - - - c $80 Q $60 i $40 $20 $0 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 W 1 1= 1 =2 = 3 ® 5 M6 07 M11 M13 - One Rate n! N 04/15/2000 Rate Chart(3)Chart 1 1:59 PM Projected SFR User Fees - Alt 3 $180 $ 160 $ 140 — $120 m LL $ 100 _ I c $80 i $60 t f e f $40 $20 � r $0 r 7 � x 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07.08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 pp 1 O1 t=2 =3 i5 =6 M7 = 11 = 13 One Rate n411 v20M Rate Ched(4)Chart 1 1:55 PM Projected '1 : 1 -F - - - $160 141 . 1 1 • .. '1 1 I ff 6 t 1 41 tl $1 1 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 •• 1 . 1 1 1. 0 1 1 1: 0 1' 19 1 1 Projected SFR User Fees - Proposed Alt 5 $180 $ 160 -- - -- - - - - - $ 140 - --- - -- $ 120 Li $ 100 c $80 c Q $60 i $40 $20 $O x 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 1 O1 02 =3 i5 =6 07 = 11 = 13 - One Rate] m 0a/1Yi= Rate chin(5)Chan 1 1:57 PM 04H72000 10:41 AM Orange County Sanitation District One District Excluding 7 & 14, One Rate Cash Flow Projections No Adopted Neles Moped in 1997 Rate Proposea PnaHminary Pmwmq pre0mpial, PreRWM, PrelimOmry Pregminary Prelhnhvuy RefunMery Prelimhmry tOVeer Ed ill. 2gffi'Fl 2W14Y2 gm:.. 03A4 0� `41 OR07 2MI 011,02 Intl Revenues: 1 G.,W User Fees 57,176,3W 68,887.880 60.609,600 .Gzly d Bg848,2W M.907,375 69,908,020 73,232,650 76,RBAW W.721,680 671.RZM 2 PanMed User Fees 5,591,000 5,732,090 5,877.oW 4.*,JOC. 8.176,000 B,=.= 6,489,000 e,01.000 6,817,000 6,987,000 82,6]5,000 3 Property Tares 28.568,000 W.169.000 3D,781,000 31AY7.01) 32.004,WD 32,844,000 33,288,000 33,965,000 34,SN,004, W.M7,000 323,757,000 4 New COP Issues - 128,000,00o - 197;Obdd00- - 1W,OW,OW - 7D.000,M - 72,000,000 4BS.M.0go 5 Interest Revenues M'Ilm.0o0 21,666,000 M.250.000 -:19,360;000 17,301,000 17,2B2,000 18,073,000 17,NB.m 17,2W,000 16,3081000 104,mal 6 Connection Fees 4.823.000 4,82B,= 4,835.000 4,8'd}. �.: 4.841.000 4,853A00 4.858,= 4,865.000 4,871,000 4,en.000 i0,500,000 7 Olhor Ravenuea(Ind IRM) 57,181000 6.840,oW J112,OW 7190.W0 1.155.M 1158,000 7,200.000 1.167.000 1,187,WD 89,182,000 6 Revenues 174,503,320 255,913,6W 125,4740 " ,462 A' 132.372.200 229.251,375 10a,788,020 213,809,650 141.4 .4W 217,457600 1,875,375.280 Reeuiremante. 9 Oper B Mtce EV 46.M.5W 45,735,000 46,418,0111) - ..47,11055,1, 19,WO,OW 50,094,W W 5;283 0 51,192,O ,000 53,398.000 5/,50],000 486,880,500 1D Capital OuOeys.Ind GVJRS 81,270.0W 12Q088,000 125,018.000 1"T 4,0d 92.433,000 55,474,000 55,231,00D 67,062.0110 69.623.000 71.913.MD 875,489,000 11 COP Smvi®(8.5%,25 n) 32,236.000 37,375,000 42,263,OW I]ABlAGe.. 62,976,W0 57,178,OW 61,684,OW 64.467,000 67,M.M 70,58g000 538,005,m 12 Oorer Reeuhementa 6,975, 0D 2,B75,OW 2,8750W875,0W 975.000 975,000 975,oW 975.000 W5oW 197W,OW 13 RaeuiremenN 168,531,5W 212,1T4,OW 21),B]I,OW "'. ? 185A .m 168,722.0W 168,992,000 1N 7870W 191,525,M 197.M.0011 1828,091,600 14 Revenues-Reammmems 7.971.820 43,740,660 (92.199.4001',.i7,14q, (9J,011A00) 02.529.375 (36.205,880) 28,012.650 (5D,160,5M) 19. 02.680 (M.716.240) A rnulated F.odw 15 Be9lnning of Yeer 344.853,0110 35;924.820 396,BBS.OW .'9p148d0W 331.590,355 288578555 3J1,107830 285,901.BW 32I,B14,BW 274J34,OW 344,853,W0 16 EMel Year M2,924,620 396,665,480 30/A80.090 .931[69D.055': 288.578,555 331.107.930 28590111W 324.814,8W 274,734,000 M.236,760 284,23G 780 Baser Servire Usor Fees: 17 A,SFR Mnuel User Fee $76A0 $78.00 $80D0 SB2.69:. 385.00 $87.50 $01.00 $95.00 899.00 5104.W 18 Percentage Change (3.25%) 2.63% 2.56% a191/1 3.03% 2.%% 4.00% 4.40% 4.21% 5.05% 19 EpumaleM Dwelling Wile 752.320 754970 757.620 78d L0'; 7M.920 765.570 M.2M A0,870 773.520 776,170 2D SFR CanneoBpn Fee $1.820 $1.62D $1,820 Sf,B20 Stella 61,620 61,820 $1,820 $1,620 S1AW Prq An Deity Flow(mad) 250 245 251 257 263 As 275 281 287 293 COP Coverage Rallis 21 Senior Uen,Min 1.25 6.59 3.61 2a7 2.0 2,36 2.21 2.18 2.M 2.13 Val 22 Janur Liar,Min 1.00 3.19 172 1,36 1.17 1.18 1.W 0.97 1.02 093 0.92 23 Sr Additional Dend0.1.25 6.59 3.61 297 2.56 2,W 2.23 2.18 234 2.13 2.13 N Jr Motional goods,l.W 5.26 2.M 1.72 1.32 1.29 an 0.94 1.04 0,87 oas G',lescel.tlte15n121019B-0O SudgNlRevenue Nee 98-00 BudBal X7B14 One DISIX 7814,one mla - CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY. P.O. BOX 3070. GARDEN GROVE. CALIFORNIA 92842 .B..A BIOBLWeICf B William).Damon Mann Pm Trm (714) 741=1 Mm ley. March 22. 2000 Gvuibnn� Mwk Ra rn The Honorable Jan DeBay. Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis St. Fountain Valley. CA 92708 Dear Chairwoman DeBay: When the Orange County Sanitation Districts consolidated into the Orange County Sanitation District in 1998. the old district boundaries were maintained for financial purposes because of the significant financial disparities between the districts. and the necessity for higher rates in some districts to pay for District services. These separate rate areas were necessary to ensure that persons within relatively stable and efficient pre-consolidation districts, such as the second and third. would not be forced. through District-wide fees. to subsidize more expensive districts. such as the first and the eleventh. Now, in the name of bureaucratic convenience. and in defiance of the fairness upon which the current system is structured, the FAHR committee has brought forward three plans to implement a semi-district-wide fee system (excluding district 7 and the Irvine Company's district 14). This new fee system shows a district-wide cash-flow shortfall of-$50 million over 10 years. We firmly believe that the district should maintain separate accounting and fees for each of the fee areas at least until all of the former districts are brought to financial parity so that a uniform fee can be adopted without eitherrobbing Peter to pay Paul, or eroding reserves. On behalf of the City of Garden Grove, I encourage you to oppose the FAHR-proposed inequitable redistribution among fee districts. Thank you for your consideration of our position on this important matter. Sincerely. BRUCE A. BROADWATER Mayor Y& '.au4G • April 26, 2000 STAFF COMMENTS Re March 22, 2000 Letter from Mayor of Garden Grove The topic of user fee rate consolidation was broached during the Directors' deliberations regarding consolidation. At that time, the Directors wisely agreed to put the issue aside while they dealt with the political realities of changing State statute, changing Board representation, and changing voting procedures. They agreed that they needed more information before they could consider a consolidated sewer user fee program. During the intervening two years, staff and Directors' committees have had many discussions about consolidating the user fee rates. The Directors have asked questions and raised many issues. Staff has done more research, provided answers and developed alternatives. In fact, a brief workshop including questions and answers was conducted at the March Board meeting, the same day the Mayor was writing his letter. The consolidated user fee rates proposed by the General Manager and the FAHR Committee for 2000-01 and 2001-02 are equal to the lowest rates adopted in 1997 for any of the then Districts. In fact, these rates will provide a small annual decrease to most of the Garden Grove residents, who are currently served by Revenue Area 2. The proposed program is a movement away from one based upon historic local agricultural land uses and a desire to move wastewater away from development to modem regional urban and suburban uses and a need for highly efficient, highly sophisticated wastewater treatment. The focus has changed from sewers to treatment, reuse, and protection of the environment. Certainly a regional approach to funding is appropriate for our regional approach to environmental stewardship. The cash flow proposals included in the agenda package are only estimates,just like those used in the budget and for other planning purposes. It is true that the proposal indicates a reduction of ending reserves of$50 million by 2008-09. It also indicates a weighted average SFR user fee of$104 per year in the place of an annual fee of$117.95 in the 1999-2000 budget. Staff Comments Page 2 of 2 " April 26, 2000 The current reserve policy includes an amount set aside for"Short-term Specific Capital Projects." This amount was $118 million when the current budget was prepared, and is intended for the Ground Water Replenishment System. Current projections are for that project to be completed within the next five years, and for those "reserves"to be spent. If nothing else were changing, this could result in a reserve reduction exceeding that shown in the proposal. Although money is involved, and although we have described this proposal as a rate consolidation, it is not really a financial issue. This is the next logical step in mending a political process. Orange County today, and for the foreseeable future, is fundamentally different than that of 1954. Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal is a regional service. It provides an enormous environmental benefit to the region and it should be funded on a regional basis. If we were to form a district today, knowing what we know, and serving the area and population we serve, we would form one large regional district with a single user fee program. GGS:lc \\radon\datal\wp.dta\fiM210\crane\FAHR\Fah20001Apr\StaffComments-GGLtr.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeegngDete To8d.ofgr. oizsroo AGENDA REPORT namNunwr nemNunDe 18 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Andrei loan, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish May 24, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. at the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time, and place, for the public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 2-41; and (2) Establish May 31, 2000, as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Relocation and/or Protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41. SUMMARY A focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was necessary to address environmental issues associated with the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation And Protection, Contract No. 241. The EIR preparation was based on the findings of a biological survey of the project area and on a geotechnical study. The EIR addresses all realignment1protection alternatives included in the project realignment study. The EIR was mailed out for public comment and review on April 12, 2000. The Notice of Completion was filed on the same date. Staff recommends that a public hearing be held on May 24, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., at the regularly scheduled Board meeting. The review period will end on May 31, 2000, when all comments must be submitted to District staff. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) SAWPA will pay between 50 percent and 76 percent of the project costs depending upon the selected construction alternative. ...e.e: SM00 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following is an overview of the project EIR process: • File Notice of Preparation (NOP) 9/21/1999 • File Notice of Completion and circulate Draft EIR 4/12/2000 • Draft EIR Public review period 4/12/2000-5/31/2000 • Public Hearing 5/24/2000 • Final EIR Publication 7/14/2000 • Final EIR Certification 7/19/2000 • Resolution of Findings 7/1 912 0 0 0 • File Notice of Determination 7/20/2000 • Appeal Period Ends 8/25/2000 In September 1999, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial study were distributed to interested agencies and private parties for review and comment. All comments received were reviewed by Staff and the District's EIR Consultant, K.S. Dunbar and Associates. These comments were incorporated and addressed in the Draft EIR, with other information necessary to comply with CEQA. Pending the Board's authorization, the EIR review period will end on May 31, 2000, a week after the public hearings scheduled for May 24, 2000. The comments to written and verbal comments will be published in the final EIR. The Board will have the opportunity to review the public comments prior to certification of the EIR at its May 24, 2000 regular meeting. ALTERNATIVES Not approving the public hearing date and/or the end of the EIR review period. If these milestones are not approved, the project may not proceed, thus allowing the SARI line to become vulnerable to damage due to high flows in the Santa Ana River. CEQA FINDINGS Board certification of the EIR is scheduled for July 19, 2000. ATTACHMENTS None AI:jo PradonWatal%wp.dtalagenda\Board Agenda Reports@000 Board Agenda RepoftZ400Ylem 1B.dm x.i..a: arms• Page 2